The URL can be used to link to this page

7380 SW BONITA ROAD x 5ECTION / T2 ,� R I VM , MAP 2 13) 112 A U!✓ 7"r I x I t , `. ? /-//?1' AlY.0RAN7 { 500 2Mtruction Notes-: 400 ( 1 . Notify Tigard Water District prior to commencing construction . 2 . All work shall be in accordance with h .W .W.A _ standards . E Xi s T i N G �. ''� T1. L A K O J �/'✓�r C7 M., VAI Ifs _ �. I 3 . All work shall. 1)e inspected and approved by TWD 23 01VI T ROAD _._ 4. Fire hydrant assembly consists of . MJ x FIg tee , FIg _ � -.. _.__,� ._ � , _ ~ _____ _- _,- .- -------__._ --- _•___ - _.. ____. ------ _ .----- _.__.-,y_... ._. .. MVO, 3 t - 7. N"T hese connections , 1 - . x Flc� gate valve E ' Fig x Flg sf��l and Pac3 f is Sts.�-ea fire hydrant, 514 O, 3-port t2 Y s , QY, �x,s T,,�6 h poor. f a xv 4 f N P R a..'E c r . `:, ` ? c!' �6 D,i. /. a, pumper) . 6" r Ig oannectims , 114" Pent Opr Nut , open left , color: CO/Y/t/f CT TO f.0ST/N6 lw,. red , traffic model . - 0/ `�` 5 . Poured concrete thrustblocks at least R square feet of bearing g.L1xIa� e at all cross , .ee . bend , and blow-off 1ncai # 7ng 1 6" 6 . 3E " of 3/4 " minus gravel cover for all ma3ns in streets or goo driveways ; a++herwise 36 " of earth cover . f ! 1 1400 7 . All sanitary sewer lines 10 ' `I-kt:erally or 3 ' vertically of �- 4 ` © water main shall- be encased iy, concrete E " thick 10 ' from i�VJ r A Z 1- !'SENDS, � ` - � C Where crossings are necessary they must be rade �� X'ossing a !t „ � � at approximately 90 with at least 18 separation below water Line . 8 . Mains shall be tested at 150 psi for 1 hour . 'T j 1100 t >• 9. O. 8 .B. x. bacteriological tests required . 1900 10. TW shall install all copper services prior to blacktopping of streets . Meters will be insUilled by the district upon l f200 f igp,p 1 n q individual request for samc . IVsrAtc r2" C9 V. 11. Upon completion of installation , contractor will advise TWD c� of totAI construction costs to Which will be added 10% for t i distrf dt inspections , water loss , overhead , administration , 3 etc . , and 8% for 4 sampling , a ineering including pwmits , j as-built drawings , updating of master map , intersection maps, etc . /IVs 7't L C F. hl, / 700 1 j300 i e10 ._ ,. I 1 } 1 1400 { 1600 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 7149 � %. 8841 S.W. COMMERCIAL STREET * TIGARD, OREGON 972.23 !A/S7A41 Cpl' G.V. `l G � TELEPHONE (503) 6391554 lullvG '�� ✓ WATER PROJECT tN0 PRO J!' C' T. 1-4 -r'q A Vf Allliox- t 41600 5. W .50U /H 01,c 3c,)NITA ,,671, .jAD � t I 4 70�) r` ..,�.rB �.1 19W r:(Orte I �rA ROAD' 2900 lobert E Santee, P.E Administrator Vjl ; ti Scale / = 200 14 ,,,1 tilt/ 19 76 n � � � ,l � �r - . ,..... .-_,. t ._� _. i � �� 1 �,r1. 1.�..1-,.1 �1�11 111_ 1 ►✓ 1 �� I �II''>I, ." .. . . . .r.a.' .r, . T, ... .. -,...t, -. .. ..•.«w+......-...- I � ��'i1'i 1 � 1i1(1 I �1��1 1 � 1 � 1�1 I�'��III f � f� l �� lll � ll III � III Ilf ` r� I � I � I � I 111 � 1 � 1 III � 111 III � III I11 � 111 tll � lll Tif , �ll 111 , 111 111 � 111It11it11 � ..n.� � „� ..�..a..y.... ..;�,�,,, � � 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 1�0 11 12 . NOTE : IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOT IC;E `IT IS DUE TO THF QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ...•-fi'rDRAW I NG, _..._.. _�— -_ -__�-----------z----•-i awasw t1E 62 B2 12 92 S2., h2 E2 22 12 0 6.1 81 L I 91 S1 t, I F I 21 11 01 6 9 1 9 S �,►�''"'� r��1�1II1�IIII�IIII�1111IItIIIItIIllllt�llt�lllll�illllt111�1111111ttitalt�tittltttl�cttt�llll�llll�tllilli,11lliillllllll+litll'�i1fit�1111�1Ifllltll�yll�lllf�llfllllll,11111111I�IIUIIIIL�Iiltlll!l�IIIIIUII�IJJII11��l111�1111�IIIIIIIU�IIII�IIII�Ill1�Ei1llIUI�I111�1111�1�11.11�ilil�lllllllll�Nll V ,1 p i { M i 77. 7777 r� "/:180 SW WNI'TA ROAD 0 A 1 C17Y OF TIFA RD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON April 15, 1980 John Skourtes National Safety Route 1, Box 575H Beaverton, OR 97005 Dear Mr. Skourtes: RE: 7380 SW Bonita Sewer Service Account We reviewed your file regarding the beginning billing date for the sewer service fee. According to the sewer permit (1118761) you purchased on March 27, 1979, the billing date would, and did, begin on August 1, 1979, per the conditions of the permit outlined in red (see enclosed copy). Due to the unique circumstances concerning this property, Ed Walden, the Building Department Official, has decided to give you the extension date you requested. The charges on the account from August 1, 1979 through January 31, 1980 will be cleared and your new charges for sewer service will begin effective February 1, 1.980 in conjunction with the water hookup in February. Your revised billing is enclosed. We do hope this is agreeable with you. Sincerely, "Ed Walden Building Official Enc. rs -- 12420 S.W. MAIN P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 6,19 4171 — a v'�udD SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION COF TIGARD Data , 19 ..__ No._.._ f _, The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as sh-wn in the accompanying plans and specifications. SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: i 7 380 Sw 13orei t.;, APPLICANT: Owner Lessee —_ Authorized Representative NAME/COMPANY 1;Ur1x��ITL SIGH CO. Tel. -33-4999 PROPOSED SIGN: 3 fT1 handing x nnc9 Weld { � Projecting = Other SIGN DIMENSIONS ='.ISS! AREA i _ HEIGHT WALL AREA PROPERTY FRONTAGE _ COSTS ONING PISi.TW7,., ILLUMINATION EON['; MATEgIAL ALiit W ITM;XzM WD ax>ai:'YMI COLOR STdJ 71stb_1Wiii.3sx COPY ?'rii ARE: F1JV-U P1r.TVN DRB EXISTING SIGNS: Freestanding Well —_— Projecting Other COMMENTS: All sir;i permit% must be accompanied by a scale drawing and plot plan. If work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed PLANNING DEPARTMENT within ninety days after the issuance of the permit, the permit shall become null and void. I Permit Fee ria ( Y-- .J. .. �� Approved ► Applicant's ig�hature RA Receiptl�o__T I o .Jox 2 3U 36 Ti and 6 39-4999 Renewal Date Addren Telephone I 1 f ��';�c:L"'Cf l''/rl"�f'�""1"t� . r'yp-�/ . _y•�:� �7�i n► t s �'�.I X �7� ._.. ...w-xr•.rurwauv.+ra+w 1�I�ga.i�.a�.kris.grw�uws�rrr...ww.ua....wad..+..c:.. 1 j a �,r N ci p 1 w 0 dgel ccd � � 14 ?.:vYy .'¢'�q}''+t+' ', .,.,"�L u•ia' �- � n�'•.t`v r '.�,s 9 P ,apt .. ��'\� ^n+a •"`ems � �•'r NpS t+lb'`" �''. o�"e ::� �x �' 1+,'• � '11�. �+�, ,.� � �. `',.'"",`t'�' '�/ijy �I1�' tf hr. lt SIRS nt'irr` ?►:it'iI�r' �alA, �s. , ,1r�'1'i,`','�atill�•. yItA` dJn !. r4\ �',.�' 4 9"' � 7 �, �' "<^� 4j ,,; � ref'+.r''" 1 �� 11�+� ,a"•111 •�li�� ,� >.;�it. =1.'�n,,)►,� .�,�-•�.a( •lll ,7►;' "n�.:��- 111�'1., .�'.L ,111 .►1'�e'�:`al�il�,.�('�,� ;� k t. ` fir*-i,a�,:•,—^t�..,....^^^ _r,._ Cal /t• ,iAD 19 wk a CN `.. j1� N O b , ', �(A . ^'may^ N 'a ,1 r .5i177 a ro y VG a ^is3e r E-4 K ;..� f c ,Lj En L �i ••�:'�-•.�� ro as .., �. �� ',��, ,t't.. .'�:}!gay •` tq N C4.31 A C3 ITO =' z ji .0 �• it 3 "v '� v o y •� r q j CI .,:1iE� "� `� '�� " it`F'd �. ..�Ut<� �'•,�r t,, U�.. �., t; +t�x , I� 41 ¢j�1 fir '�i�7Y//r1u � ts�k ii�W ' �1 ILII V.r �. �'SL .,SQA. ,�„ �.'�.•,. � �t'•� �, ^%�{, _� ..�-'IYr � -►; �:,v o' Mh,•.ti�Y�A , tF�, /r#Ar � ;'• ~'��fir'" Y7R� a Thomas Consulting Engineers, Inc. Structural Engineers and Planners 10211 S.W. Barbur Blvd Suite 210 A Portland, Or. 97219 (503)2454055 February 14 , 1.980 City of Tigard P.O. Box 23557 12420 S.W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attention: Mr. Ed Walden Re• National Safety Co. Building at 7380 S.W. Bonita Rd. Gentlemen: Analysis of the Wind Shear Loading on the 100' and 150'-2" wall of the subject building shows a Shear of 84 PLF and 40 PLF respectively, This is less than the allowable of 140 PLF shown in the Stan-Steel Specifications. Sincerely, Ernest L. Preedy, P.E. c .c. Joe Wilson- Wilson Fire Protection ELP/ia a .. :or INSPECTION TIME : p _ PEHM! r NO. : DATE: DATE ISSUED:..-- L_L OWNERS NAME : ADDRESS : CONTRACTOR TEST. Air ❑, Water p , visua! ❑ , Laboratory ❑ R SULT. Approved ❑ , Disapproved ❑ Pending L] S a' 17 INSPECTOR DATE rNOTE : Attach supplemental test data heret] J GEARIN, LANDIS & ,AEBI LA.VYERS 1516 GEORGIA-PACIFIC BUILDING PORTLAND. OREGON 97204 TELEPHONE 15 0 31 224-C,532 JOHN GORDON OEARIN DAVID C LANDIS FRrO M AEBI JOE D.BAILEY JEf FREY M BATCHELOR FRANK A.MOSCATO JOHN C.MERCER 7� JAMES M.CALLAHAN August'- 17 , l 979 Ms. Raeldon Barker City A3m.init;trator P.U. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 He: National Safety Company Warehouse Sewer Our file : 1.2, 836-43 Dear Raeldon: I enclose some correspondence to you and say that I ani sending it in an attempt to help us get rid of. the Skourtes problem. The current one, at least. Ed Walden and I met with Fred Anderson, Skourtes, and Wilson on Thursday afternoon and a-reed on this as a course which might. end the problem with as little pain and expense as possible. Very truly yours , Joe D. Bailey JDB:pb Enclosures RECEIVE=D AU G U 1979 CITY OF TIGARD GEARIN, LANDIS & AEBI LAWYERS 151G GLORGIA-PACIFIC Lf UILDING PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 TELEPHONE 11,031224-6532 JOHN GORDON GEARIN DAVID C.LANDIS FRED M.AEB, JOE D.BAILEY JEFFREY M.BATCHELOR FRANK A.MOSCATO JOHN C.MERCER JAMES M.CALLAHAN August. 17 , 1979 Fred Anderson, Esq. 8865 SW Center Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: National Safety Company Warehouse Sewer Our file : 12 , 836-43 Dear Fred: I enclose a letter I have prepared for the Unified Sewerage Agency. Please send it on if it meets with your approval . I know that Mr . Skourtes is extremely anxious, and I offer you (without trying to be encouraging about it) my telephone number for the next week . It is 593-1186. Very truly yours, Joe D. Bailey J DB:ph Enclosure IMMAMMUL.. .. Gr-AKIN. LANDIS & AEL31 LAWYERS 1510 GEORGIA-PACIFIC BUILDING PORTLAND. OREGON 97204 TELEVHUNE 1502'224-6532 JOHN CORDON GEARIN DAVID C.LANDIS FRED M.AESI JOE D.BAILEY J!'FFREY M.BATCHELOR FRANK A MOt+CATO JOHN C.MERCER JAMES M.CALLA04AN August 17 , 1979 w Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County Washington County Courthouse Hillsboro, Oregon 9712:3 Re: National Safety Company Warehouse, 74th and Bonita , Tigard Our file: 12, 836-43 ,..._.l., Ut411 1 C1lILn: I represent Tigard as its city attorney. You will recall , I am sure, that the National Safety Company was given the right to connect directly to your interceptor at the location identified above. The City of Tigard has had responsibility, of course, for the private line connecting the warehouse to the stub you had constructed off your interceptor. . Although we recognize that it is Tigard ' s job to inspect that line , I am writing you now to ask for assist- ance from you in the nature of a favor. We have encountered enough misunderstanding and hard feeling in the course of the administration of this project to convince all of us involved that your making this inspection on behalf of the public agencies involved would be a great service to us all . Please be assured that we have made substantial efforts to accomplish this inspection and the completion of the project without your. involvement. We just haven' t been able to get it done. Both sides agree that if you would inspect the project, both sides will abide by the .results of your inspection and that will be the end of what has become an extremely wasteful. and damaging affair. One of the reasons for this request is that the developer faces an early September 1.979 financing deadline which concerns him a great deal . We are eager to provide a mechanism which will let him feel he has been fairly treated and he is eager to have someone other than personnel of the City of Tigard inspect the site. If you can perform this Unified Sewerage Agency of 0ashington County August 1.7 , 1979 p-ige 2 service, please make the approprateiinspection and of yinform me and Fred Anderson, the developer ' s , our conclusion. Mr. Anderson' s address is 8865 sW Center street, Tigard, Oregon 972.23. Very truly yours , Joe D. Bailey JDB:pb ADORE 35 PERMIT N0,_ I9UI PERMIT CHARGE none CONNECTION FEE - _ PAID BY TYPE Oi_r BUILDING �. 3 ID(4 DATE CONNECTED SEP.UICC RATE 4 _ INSPECTION FEE { CONTRACTOR PAID BY DATE SIZE OF CONNECTION - ASSESSMENT PAIQ .Mq- 5(, .�" g 2W 4IIIII! sMISS IRVIN A. C0071ER CIVIL ENGINEER May 59 1979 OFFICE 227.4123 171 r.i�11FnE 7 WILLAMETTE BUILDING IINI noN PORTLAND.OREGON 87204 �. FIRIGTON REB, 246-3473 Gity of TIG.AHU Ruilding 0epcartment 12420 S. W. Merin St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 ie f. : Plan Check #78-320 Attn. : Ed Walden NR T1 ONAL SAFETY Co. Warehouse 7350 S.W. Bonita Rd. Subject: Foun .ration -moil consulteltion. !Inspect placement of oteel reinforcement in footings and retaining wall at ramp. April 30 Examine soil condition in footings ( for steel Frame bantsj excavated 6 weeks prior: daterinrated by water accumulation. Direct excavation of soFt, aaturatud soil : 6" to 12" addi- tional depth to sound hearing. Outlined nlocement of crushed granular blanket and compaction In Footings. May q. At "itn: confirm footings For steel Frame bent" eh properly upgraded by excavation 6 rock FILL. Inspect mteel rod rainForcement in footings and truck ramp raetsininq wall : #.'PROVED Fnr concrete placement. MAY S Inspect footing., E, wall Plect:ionw: poured 14 c. y. , 30000 Mix: 5 Footing* at went side for steel frame" 5 Footings at east -mids for steel frames 2 interior footings on longitudinal centerline. SM corner f oo t i ncj. Wall sectionaa " NW corner: 9 Ft. W W. Ride; 16 Ft. * N. side x 4 ft. high. Umntilever retaining wall with Footing along truck ramp kel rvirth eridt 18 ft. long x 4 ft. high, 14 c. yde. , 3OOnS mix, placed. !O ao,Fn r9� 112 rat: ' c� I. A• �fi � t c. t 1 Conmulting Engineer STRUCTUHAL DAMAGE APPRAISAI A POIINDATiON sotL INSPECTIONS SUIT VG YS INVESTIOATioNS c�TY TIGARD DATE 3/27/ _,19 P� BUIL .DING PERMIT APPLICATION of ;•E r�c, �,: THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE __ OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHO LOT NO. OWNER 'ist UI7al_68 lot i.JOB ADDRESS'?3" `3'w L'Snits Road HOMEADDRESS SSr419xx OMMI'x1A ARCHITECT Eim7a ENGINEER ��C Thomas 4111111111119 ADDRESS _ DESIGNER STRUCTURE ©'NEW_ ❑RFMTIDEL ❑ADDITION ❑REPAIR ❑RENEWAL [:]FIRE DAMAGE GDEMOLITION ❑ RESIDENCE (3COMM ❑EDIICATIONAL ❑GOWT ❑RELIGIOLIS❑PATIO ❑CAR PORT ❑GARAGE ❑STORAGE❑SLAB ❑FENCE BOND ❑_MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USE ❑DESIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL .IPP90VED ❑SIGN'. OCCUPANCY :3"2 LAND USE ZONE_` BLDG.TYPE FIRE ZONE x PLAN CHECK BY I4 P fberker HEAT _ -.onseruct ramMa>rciel building, all per pllene prepared by L• Ve +mea, Or,sulTing Engineer. _ APPROVED BY RAELQON R• 60KIR 372-,179 ,ieww, _a;rmit 916761 �, 1J'�0*00 _ (� ----- 1 16 1 10,20 1V0•BEDROOMS - 7C GAD .__ ______FLQQR-4AC?__ HEIGHT !_NQ.STORIES AREA _. OMS ___VAI U _ BUILDING DEPARTMENT IT BACKS FROR~IrE PLANSREARLEFT SIDE � RIGHT SIDE Permit ill•sU THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING Plan Cffft Ii` (160*7:)) REGULATIONS AND ALI_ APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH Sub-total ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NO1WAIVE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRAC"IOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS State Taxi .la•S6 LICENSE. SEPAr/ATE`P.1}J41�TS REQUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total S-13A•36 By pl _ - -=� — - ----- ---------- __TT_ • f�r ��' 4� APPI 1(-ANT f)P A(:ENr Ap )I oved Receipt No. 2 re.NMu....1---_-`ir. /II�.arYI�A►.YM. XWi.Yi.uMik..�wN -1.'. ..u.'.....yrrw/IM __-_. -_. .....ti,._...._ t a. a air car yea � a� I DATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS , PLUMBING DAT! Q ci, Contractor _ PerrnitNo. Fixture _3e— .r i / Final HEATING �1Zb 21 Cu, . alVLa— AApKj v• � Contractor IL Permit No. 16 El ?1 �� Ges or Oil J 7 J �LZ�11. c I —/Aliv-1 Final — J l�.L _ 1 SEWER Final DRIVEWAY -- — -- ---- -- Final Storm Drainage I �- IRain Drain)Final Sidewalk Curb dr Street Final Approach BLDG. DEPT. IINAL TEMPORARY CERTI'ICAT6 OCCUPA14CY Flnel CHRTIFICAT6 OCCUPANCY Landscaping Zoning Final ''actR%I!'"'►R'�t"t7y��4S"'�'roR�'1',/gW:�a�riw114.a+rro''^�c'tq�— QU!I..DING PERMIT APPLICATION Co Y TIGARD DATE /Z% 19 7'y 1 H UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE - W OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING Pt ANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OWNFRPHONE_ LOT NO.- OWNER 1 La,i3��(31 `' p ot,y t-XXI ADDRESS 11'380 :/Aj f o,U HOME ADDRESS _ ARCHITECT ENGINEER BUILDER r<ll?1!^ i _ ADDRESS DESIGNER STRUCTURE ❑NEW ❑FIT MnDEL ❑_ADDITION ❑REPAIR ❑RENEWAL ❑FIRE DAMAGE _ ❑DEMOLITION ❑ RESIDENCE ❑COMM ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑GOV'T ❑RELIGIOUS❑PATIO ❑CAR PORT ❑GARAGE ❑STORAGE❑SLAB ❑FENCE ❑BOND ❑MOVING ❑CONDIT+DNAL.USE ❑DESIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL APPROVED ❑SIGNS — OCCU,'ANCY___,_.. LAND USE TONE _3LDG.TYPE FIRE ZONE` PLAN CHECK BY H r N•berker HEAT �— ;I>4E paving ;+fa[ L1tiZltb ------ -- - -'s-- -`----- - J----_----- -- QS&�LS2A�---F.1.4S?R LOAD _—_ _HLIGHL.__._______NO1__ BUILDING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REAR LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit E.,0 l)U THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING Plan Check REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES ANO ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE — WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TAF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH Sub-total ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAh E RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS State Tax 204U LICENSE, SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total By P1 -- — A P( WANT OR A G E N 1 '—"------- Approved rarUgl, H.�t Receipt No a m IrIIIEALJI�- _ a•. DATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS PLUMBING DP iE Contractor Permit No. Rough-In Fixture Final HEATING Contractor Permit No, Gas or Oil Rcugh-in Final ——� SEWER -- Final DRIVEWAY V Final S-om Drainage (Rein Dreln(Final Sidewalk Curb&Street Final Approach BLDG. DEPT. FINAL TtMPORARY CERTIFICATQ OCC Y CQRTIFICATQ OCCUPANCY Attt��C" p Pinel Landscaping Zoning Final Ct7.,L�T� MOAALPIRARP�11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILuNLAL MR t n r 1 �, I dli � t P R I] t t t I I] o � sl � cl P U BOX 127 0 TUALAI IN, ORf(:ON 97067 9 PHONE 687-7601 • RUSSr I.I. WASHBURN, CHIEF March 2.7 , 1979 National Safety Company Wilson Fire Protection 12003 Fourth Plain Road Vancouver, Washington 98662 Attention: Joe Wilson and John Skourtes Re: National Safety Company building, 14th & Bonita Road, Tigard Gentlemen: This letter will serve to confirm our conversation of March 27, 1979 at the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District headquarters regarding installing a fire sprinkler system in your building by July 1 , 1980 as outlined in letter of March 20, 1979. This built-in fire protection would be in place of installing an accessible fire hydrant within 250 feet of the building, with the following conditions : _ 1 . 'the fire sprinkler system be installed meeting the design of Central Sprinkler System's on and off system. 2. The sprinkler system have a minimum of 2" ID water connection or equivalent. 3. The sprinkler system have a minimum of a 2�" fire department connection on the building site located as per fire department specifications. 4. The sprinkler system shall have any necessary permits as required by the appropriate agencies. 5. Two sets of sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District for approval . 6. The sprinkler system shall be installed and operational by July 1 , 1980 as per your signed letter dated March 20, 1979. It is our understanding that a hydrant will be located by the Tigard Water District on the 74th Street side of the property and that in a letter dated 2 r1_5r the Tigard Water District agreed to install a hydrant between the tracks on Bonita Road at such a time as it becomes feasible for them to do so. These agreements with the Tigard Water District shall not be considered as a requirement of compliance by the National Safety Company. -2- This agreement between the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District and the (rational Safety Company officers shall be reviewed by the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District's attorney to ensure that the necessary built-in commitments to fulfill both parties ' obli- gations shall be included in the agreement. There shall be no addi- tional requirements placed upon the National Safety Company by the Tualatin Fire District upon consummation of this agreement. Upon approval by the fiie district's Attorney, this shall be the whole agreement between the parties. Tentatively agreed to: John Skourtes`�}} --�� Tentatively agreed to: floe Wilson Tentatively agreed t •_ 7 _ _ ,•h��_ — Asst. Ch of Doug Krebs dm A cI l ceipt #2422 EVVER ,E'ERM T:�' N° 18761 Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County TTY Tigard /DAT 3 27 '79 OWNER: National Safety Company PHONE : .89-9526 OWNER 'S ADDRESS: TYPE OF INSTALLATION : BUILDING SEWER Fl-'B'UILDING SEWER AND SIDE SEWER TYPE OF OCCUPANCY: El NEW ❑ SINGLE FAMILY COMMEfCIAL [; EXIST. (PRIOR TO 7- 1- 70 ) ❑ MULT. RES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL FIXTURE UNITS_,_______, ... DWELLING UNITS„_,_3 ADDRESS OF STRUCTURE : ?380 SW Borita Road PERMIT CONDITIONS: THE APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL RULES AND RECO II ATT(INS OF THE_UNIFIED. SEWERgGE - AGENCY. WHEN CALLING FOR INSPECTION , _.,PLEASE REFER TO THE PERMIT NUMBER. THIS APPLICATION EXPIRES IN ONE- PUNDRED AND TWENTY ( 120 ) D_AY_S. THE AMOUNT PAID WILL BE FORFEITED SHOULD EXPIRATION OCCUR. w — FEES: PERMIT FEE s 50. 00 CONNECTION CHARGE 1800.00 SIDE SEWER INSTALLATION Penny_ Liebertz IS-SLIED BY OTHER �-- TOTAL 1850. 00 3/2-7/79 _ } APPLrCAT DATE CAY$ OF TliE Am VU Ra TN,S SEvik P `RM IT nw � l�IT. N . 1�� 1 61 "-AbRESS OF STRUCTURF 7380 SW Bonita Road TAX MAP TAX LOT _ SYSTEM Fanno Creek LOT BLOCK _ OF _ lR . R .Barker �2"7 79 --- 3/2'7;79 APPROVED BY DATE T;�SUED BY DATE D . U . ' S 3 REMARKS Building Permit #2627 RECEIVED MAR 2 T 1979 I R V I N A. COOPER CITY OF TIGARO CIVIL ENGINEER N ;-ir r:t-+ P 1"J79 '" f OFFICE 227.4123 REGISTERED: WILLAMETTE BUILDING G REGON PORTLAND,OREGON 57204 WASHINGTON RE6. 246-3463 City of Tigard Building Dept. 12420 S. W. Main St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Flan Check 478-320 Attn. : Ed Walden HeF. : NATIONAL SAFETY Co. Proposed WAHEHOUSE 7350 S. W. Bonita Fid. ' TL' 4000, T2S, H1W, W.NI. Subject: (A ) Foundation soils appraisal and (bj inspection of footings excavation prior to concrete placement. (A ) An initial inspection/survey at the site, December 5 was reported under date of December 26. Six paragraphs delineate otserv-3i.luns tilos. 1 , 2 b 3; Nos. 4, 5 6 6 outline specific items to be imp: emented. LS) Property Owner John Skourtes has authorized supei-vision of the work, which will be reported to the Building Department on satisfactory completion. 7 / i" lA C:cc I . A C:9-6per Consufeing Engineer c. c. : J. Skourtes Soils - Foundation RTRUCTUR,4I, DAMAGE APPRAISALS FOUNDATION,Solt. INSPECTIONS INVENTIOATIONS LI�I��IJ. a,� MHN HE- HK f � DI � C � I � D D � SI � ICI P. P O BOX 127 0 TUALAI IN, OREGON 97062 • PHONE 6822601 • RUSSELL MASHBURN, CHIEF March 22, 1979 RECEIVED National Safety Company MAR 23 li/y !•lilson Fire Protection 12003 Fourth Plain Rd. CITY OF TIGANU Vancouver, Washington 98662 Attention: Mr. Joe Wilson and Mr. John Skourtes Re: National Safety Co. building, 74th & Bonita Rd, Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Wilson arid Mr. Skourtes: We are in receipt of your letter of March 20, 1979 regarding irv�talling a fire sprinkler system in your building by July 1 , 1980. This nuilt-in fire protection would be in place of installing a hydrant wiihin 250' of the building, with the following conditions: 1 . That the water line extension on 74th with one fire hydrant as per Tigard !later District plan be installed and operational before the building is occupied. 2. rhe fire sprinkler to be installed meet the design of "Central Spri,1'<ler Company's on and off sprinkler head sprinkler system" , or the sprinkler system meet the requirements of NFPA #13. 3. The sprinkler system have a minimum of 2" I .D. water connection. 4. The sprinkler system have a minimum of 21 " fire department connection on S.W. 74th within 100' of the fire hydrant. 5. The sprinkler system have all the permits as required by the City of Ti(jard Building Department, the State of Oregon, Department of Commerce Plans Review Division, & 2 sets of plans of the sprinkler system be sub- mitted to TRFPD for approval 5efore the system is installed. 6. The sprinkler system be approved, installed, and operating by July 1 , 1980. 7. The fire sprinkler system be completed before the building is sold. If ycu have any further questions , feel free to call me. Yours truly. Joseph A. ' jreulich Fire Marshal ,IA(;:dm cc: Fd llalden, Bldg. Official , City of Tigard March 20, 1079 Mr. Ed Walden Citv of Tigard Tigard, Oregon Reference: 7350 SW Bonita Rd. 10,200 Sq. Ft. warehouse year 1r. Walden: Letter of understanding on the following points: A. Nouse sewer line from USA's Interceptor sewer will be laved per state plumbing code. A "T" will he installed at the junction where the I � angle was installed by the USA's contractor. h.r `t� R. �s 14r. Cooper, soil engineer, confirmed to You in December 78 and re- confirmed, he will inspect the site prior to the pouring of the concrete for the footings and will notify You that the inspection was made and approved by him. Si cerely, T Joe Wilson National Safety Company tj A�'7 It -- ---- - -�__—_ C, J TIGARD WATER DISTRICT.-_ _ . _6841 W. COMM17*.RCIAL 5T. TIGARO, OREGON 97223 PHONE (503) 639-1554 February 28, 1979 Raeldon R. Banker City Administrator City of Tigard P. O. Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main St. Rc: Proposed Warehouse; Tigard, Oregon 97223 S. W . 74th & Bonita Rd. Dear Mr. Barker: Please be advised that Mr. John Skourtes has agreed to pay his Pair share to extend a 12-inch ductile iron water main 500 feet along S. W. 74th Avenue, south of Bonita Road, to serve the subject property. (See attached plan date 14 ,Tune 1976) . A fire hydrant will be installed at the terminus of this main extension. The main with fire hydrant will be installed prior to occupancy of the proposed warehouse. In view of the above, Mr. Skcurtes has met all requirements for domestic water. service. The installation of the main along S. W. 74th Avenue was requested by the Tigard Water District in lieu of a distribu- tion main along Bonita Road, between the railroad tracks, in accordance with the master water plan of the district. A 16- inch transmission main now exists on Bonita Road, but no fire hydrant installations are authorized on this pipeline because it may soon become a high pressure direct line from the city of hake Oswego, our primary source of water. Upon completion o.E the main extension along S. W. Gaarde Street this summer, the district will have a direct transmission (high pressure) line between Waluga reservoir in Lake Oswego and our 10-MG reservoir located at 125th and Bull Mountain Road. There are no domestic connections nor fire hydrants on this line. if and when a distribution pipeline is required along Bonita Road, between the railroad tracks, Tigard Water District will make the installation, at its expense, including a fire hydrant. Please advise if additional information is desired. Sincerely yours, Robr✓rt E. � ntee Administrator cc: TRFPD John Skourtes STHAAM ENIneers, Inc. 5505 S E Mtlwaukle Avenue Combines AF P O Box 02201 Stevens, Thompson b Runyon, Inc. FEQ C��D Portland, Oregon 97202 and l 1979 (503) 234-0721 A.A. Mathews, Inc. Clry I WX 910-464.8042 �F r/�q�� PT-0780-324 February 1, 1979 V I iIi Mr. John Skourtes FE l D National Safety Company, Inc. ` `' Pox 575 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 U. S. A. WASHINGTON Court Dear Mr. Skourtes: As you requested, we arc writing this letter to describe the work done by National Construction Company on the sewer service to your �)roperty and the reason for doing this work. As I understand it, the work was done by National under their contract with the Unified Sewerage Agency because U.S.A. included in your easement the agree- ment that they would have the connection to the interceptor made and the snr- vice pipe brought up to within ten feet of the surface of the ground as it existed at that t.iw e. This was a more difficult connection to make than the ordinary one because the interceptor had to be in a steel casi ,lq passing under the railroad tracks and was at a considerable depth. The con,:ractor had to cut a hole in the casino and one in the interceptor sewer, 'Install th,- sewer service pipe, place concrete around it, Extend it up to within ten feet of the ground and plug the end. This was the extent of National Construction Company work under their contract with II. S.A. and was inspected by Mark Braun, inspector for STRAAM Engineers , Inc . , under our agreement with U. S.A. to in- spect the work done under the U.S.A. contract with National Construction Com- pany. The excavation at the end of the pipe installed by National was '.eft open for your convenience and .you were advised by Mark Braun of the need for safeguard- ing it: because of the proximity to the travelled way. It was your responsi- bility from that point on to snake whatever arrangements were necessary to conv- plete your, sewer service installation. Sincerely, STRAAM Engineers, Inc. George C. Capelle, P.E. Senior Engloeer GCC:,j s ✓/• cc: Don Schut, Unified Sewerage Agency A CRS Design Associates. inc. Company Portland, Hrnrston, Rockville, Seattle, Milwaukee. New York. Los AnoPles, Phnerliv. Atlanta erw4a. Olnver. Washonplon, 0 C, ;a Cofal GahleS, Riyadh P,lt•rnw voll ;rwtrinn a MHM BURR Mt PflotHlffil MIMILP) t P. 0. BOX 127 • TUALATIN, IREGON 97062 • PHONE 638-6861 • RUSSELL WASHBURN. CHIEF January 22. , 1979 City of Tigard Raeldon Parker, City Administrator Mayor Alan Mickelson and -Tigard City Council members 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce letter "Fire Hydrant Locations" Dear Mr. Barker: This letter is being written after receipt of a copy of a letter that was given to you by the Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce regarding location of fire hydrants. In the meeting with yourself and the Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce on January 10th, 1 went over in more detail the reasons why we wanted Tigard City Ordinance #72-76 to remain as is. This Ordinance is similar to ordinances in the cities of King City, Sher- wood, Tualatin, Wilsonville, and Durham Although the eyact wording of each of the ot1.-r city ordinances reads slightly different, the general description of the hydrant spacing is the same. Washington County Ordi- nance #118 was adopted, adopting the Uniform Fire Code, with some requirements for either hydrants or on-site water and was put into effect. The 500 ft. spacing in the Washington County ordinance was all that could be obtained at the time. This has generally not been much of a problem because most of the commercial development has incurred inside the cities in Tualatin Fire District. There is one area between Sherwood and Tualatin where some commercial development has gone on and there have been considerable problems here because there's no public water available at all . NUmcrous on-site and private water systems have been started in this area and much time has been spent trying to get. the City of Tualatin and Washington County Planning Department together to solve this problem. However, at this time, this conflict is still in effect. Other than this area , all of the commercial and industrial development in the Tualatin Fire District has come under the requirement of hydrant spacing as laid out in the city ordinances. This has been a good tool for Tualatin Fire District to obtain good water main extensions and fire hydrant locations around commercial buildings by either private water systems or extending the public water systems, either on public right-of-way or un private property. -2- The National Fire Codes , as adopted by Tualatin Fire District, under NFPA #24, Chapter 4 , Hydrants, Para. 4201 in part states : "There shall be sufficient hydrants to concentrate the required flow about any impor- tant building with no hose line exceeding 500 ft. in length. " Most buildings, unless they are very small , in order to apply the required fire flow (fire flow is the amount of water needed to put out a fire in a building based on the type of construction, size, occuponv, and fuel load in the building) takes more than one fire hydrant. B,,• using this city ordinance requiring the fire hydrant location with the man- power and equipment that Tualatin Fire District has we are able to extend our hose lines from the hydrant to the building and further extend the line inside of the building and apply the fire flow. This city ordinance is deviated from but when deviations are allowed , it's because trade-offs are made for additional fire protection inside the building. Obviously, somebody builds a fire-resistive building or provides fire protection inside the building in a sprinkler system, the burden put on the fire department and the time involved in setting up to apply the fire flow in the event of a fire, is less. In these circumstances , the minimum standards established in the city ordinance are sometimes deviated from. However, when buildings that are built without fire-resistance built into them, then the burden of providing fire protection upon the fire department is greatest and this hydrant ordinance makes it an efficient way for the fire department to quickly apply the fire flow requirement into the building. The city ordinance as now written, is written to give the city and TRFPD maximum authority for placing the hydrants near the buildings. To change the ordinance to be less restrictive and then have the fire district require stricter requirements than necessary would only put the burden on the fire district each time hydrants are needed to be more than 500 ft. from the building would create, in my opinion , a more unfair situation. The amount of commercial and industrial new construction that is going on in this district has put a considerable burden on the Fire Prevention Divisi )n of Tualatin Fire District to make sure that gocd fire-safe buildings are heing built. Changing the ordinance to 500 ft. would only create additiinal burdens for us to ,justify each time a building without good built-in fire protection is built, to show the developer why hydrants would have to be placed stricter than the city ordinance. In no way is this City Ordinance intended to be unduly restrictive on any developer or create undue hardship or cost. In this time of tax revolt, etc. , Tualatin Fire District would like to see even more standards adopted as time goes on to provide more and more burden of fire protection to be built into the buildings, rather than the community be saddles with continuing costs of fire equipment and cost of manning this fire equipment. This Ordinance is only part of the overall program. Enclosed is a copy of the City of Beaverton' s Ordinance requiring fire hydrant placement. As you can see, it reads similar to the Tigard City Ordinanre requiring hydrants to be within 250 ft. of any part of a commercial building. In speaking with the Fire Marshal of Beaverton, he has used this city ordinance as a similar tool to provide on-site fire protection in the building or near '.he building. l -3- If you have any questions , feel free to call me and I would also be free before your Tigard City Council at any time to answer any questions and support the existing City Ordinance. Yours truly, Joseph A. Greulich Fire Marshal ,IAG:dm cc: Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce w w w w Tigard -Tualatin-King 04,-Sherwood-Metzger-Washiniiton Squdre TIGA RD AREACHAMBER CF C0MMEF:CE January 17 , 1979 City Administrator Rael.don Barker, Mayor Alan Mickelson and Tigard City Council members , City of Tigard 12420 SW Main Street TigaL: Chamber of Commerce - page 2 2 . Fire ratings, which are based on the calculation of risk to ;Iructur.•es, do not acknowledge any fire hydrant location standard which is more restrictive than the 500-foot standard. In other words, 500 feet is considered optimum; those who insure against fire loss recognize no difference in risk between 250 and 500 feet. 3 . Outside the incorporated city limits, builders are required to install hydrants at distances of .500 feet. It appears to bu;.lders, therefore, that Tigard ordinances are unduly restrictive. This creates an atmosphere of ill feeling toward the city. 4. Washington County Fire District No. 1 acknowledges 500 feet as its minimum standard. Here again, builders who have dealt wit',) that jurisdiction tend to see the City of Tigard's requirement as being unreasonable . 5 . TRF'PD Fire Marshal Joe Greulich agrees that 250 feet is a strict standard and he sincerely believes that this standard should be retained. Yet he acknowledges that. the standard is often relaxed---that variances are granted with some frequency---with no increased risk to life and property. We submit that this goes against the grain of :standard development procedures. In Tigard, for instance, you es'c.ablish minimum stand i.r.d- for development . You then rely upon provisions in your subdivision, design review and other ordinances to impose additional conditions and restrictions which serve the public welfare . In the case of the fire hydrant ordinance, however, fir . Greulich supports an optimum standard, forcing a number of developers to seek variances and exceptions because the standard is obviously too rigid for their particular situations. b . In any case, the City of Tigard and the TRFPD retain the right tc impose more stringent conditions upon any development which presents an unusual hazard to adjoining property or which places an excessive burden on fire service facilities. The city staff and fire marshal would, in no way, be prevented from using their authority to protect the public from definable threats. 7 . I` is not entirely true that.- "developers will pay" for the provision of additional hydrants. As always, developers ' costs are passed on to consumers . Development and regulatory expenses are absorbed eventually by home buyers, tenants, businesses and the patrons of. businesses. 8. Additional construction and installation requirements result in increased demands for finite energy and materia). resources. The trend should be away ;` -gym any unnecessary drain on resources. Chamber of Commerce page 3 9. It .is our understanding that each TRFPD engine carries two 600-foot hose beds, which should be sufficient to fight a fi -e from one or more water sources which are a _maximum_ of 500 feet away. The TRFPD must, in fact, be able to accommodate the more lenient 500-foot standard because this is the standard in effect in the unincorporated areas . Almost any firefighting factor is more crucial than the difference between 250 and 500 .feet : fire flow, the conditions and the overall quality of each piece of engine equipment, and the availability of sufficient manpower. In summary, we emphasize: the chamber of commerce does not seek a relaxation of those standards which are sewing to protect the public welfare. Obviously, we would support no proposal which would increase risk to life and property. We maintain that a 250-foot standard is not safer than a 500-foot standar— In our opinion, it has not :been demonstrated that a more lenient requirement would in any way diminish the quality of protection afforded Tigard citizens. Thank you again for your time and consideration in this matter . Sincerely, Ceryl A. Beshears Manager CC. Joe Greulich jA W JP RECEIVED 1 ro JAN I � 1979 i r tec CITY OF TIGARD e ti P.O.Box 4309 O 0�7801 N.E. 128 Ave. Vancouver, WA. 98662 NBus. 206-256-4094 Home 206-256-4519 January 13, 1979 Mr. Ed Walden Buildina Official for, Citv of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: your letter of January n, 107^ Item#2 Site work upgrading can not cormence until building permit is issued. We see no Problem in having engineer Cooper o'k site before footings a^e poured. Para#2 Not true. Please review letter of October 27, 1972 from National Safety Co. to Tualatin Fire District, Board of Directors toqether with supporting docuniants . 1FGrthermore review documents and minutes of City council meeting last September 1978 wherein city council approved project. Fire district ordinance requires every 500 feet. Please Ed tell us one logical reason why you would require us to spend $9,000.00 for a third hydrant to serve a 10,000 sq. ft. light hazard occupancy warehouse with no exposer to any neighbors building. You and I know that ordinances and rules are waived daily. We might remind you that if ,you review the City of Tigard budget not one cent is budgeted for fire protection. This means that the City of Tigard is not in the fire protection business. The public agency that has the authority by statute to provide the service, fire protection, sets the standard for the district. Our building site is inside the fire district. From a practical approach you can not have two sets of rules especially when the City limits of Tigard are of an extreme irregular shape and so fluid e.g. island annexations ; and the fire district along the Northern city limits of Tigard, Washington Fire District #1 use the National Standard 5nn feet distance of hydrants. page ] ParaF3 Our building site is inside the Tigard Water District. Of 1 course no permission is rPnuired to use public fire hydrants. On the notable water question vie have every legal right to drill a %,,ell if we so elect no permission is rewired. Of course no occunancy permit will he issurPd Until we have notable water. Para#5 No work can commence in the ditch until the weather improves and nermit issured. Question on Fees: Sewer 'ee regulations read as follows "one dwelling unit 1/4 acre - acre rounded to the nearest 1/4." Therefore .81 -icres rounded to the rarest 1/4 is .75 arses or three units. 1 cannot comment on the other fee discrepancies because I don 't know. If you show rr,e your support, in nerson for your conclusions we wi71 certainly agree to pay them. Please bring this to a rarid conclusion so we can receive a buildira permit. Sincerely, 1 / page 2 CITY OF TIGARD January 9, 1979 Wilson Fire Protection P.C. Box 6309 Vancouver, Washington 98662 Subject: October 27, 1978 Plan Check Review by Tigard and your letter of December 30, 1978 on National Safety Bldg. plans at 7380 SW Bonita Road, Tigard. Dear Joe: Per your letter you indicate ynu have complied with all items of Plan Check. After reviewing plans and your letter of December 30 we find the following items have not been complied with: Plan Check Item #2: Enclosed in your letter of December 30th was a letter from Irvin A . Cooper , Civil Engineer, to National Safety Company recommending procedure to upgrade foundation stratum and recommended concrete mix for footings and floor s_ abs. In order to preclude any future disagreement between owner and "ity Buildin Department we will require, under Sec. 305 (Special Inspections U. B.C. 1976, a written statement from Cooper Engineering, stating that you have complied with all items of their of December 28, 1978, before ;-iny concrete is placed. On your Par. #1 re structural steel plans I might remind you the National Steel Company plans and computer print-out are not stamped by any engineer. You did include a letter of certification from National Steel Company signed by a J. William Reuscher, P.E. for a certain type building with certain restrictions. Your Par. #2 with regard to the Fire Hydrant, plan does not meet the requirements of Tigard Rural Fire Protection District lettar of April 26th, 1978 which requires a hydrant within 250' of any part of the proposed building and accessible. Your Par. #3. - Before any building permit can be issued, City of Tigard will require evidence of statement by the Tigard Water District that arrangements have been made with them to furnish potable water and fire protection water to the si.t3. This has not been done to date by you or National Safety Company. Your Par. #5 - Before a permit will be issued the illegal tap at the sewer main is to be exposed and capped to prevent any infil- tration into the main sewer line. Please note: that Item #5 of October 27 plan check will require the existing house sewer now laid without a permit will be re-laid per State Plumbing Code. The permit for the house sewer is part of Sewer Hook-up and Inspection Perm-' t. I am returning your check #2448 in the amount of $2, 540. 00 for the following reasons : 1) No building permit will be issued from this office until all above items have been complied with. 2) Following is the correct breakdown for building permit when it can be issL,ed: / Sewer - Tax Lot, #4000 = . 81 acres X 4 = 3. 24, 1/4 acres or 5 DU ' s DU' s X $600. 00 each = SM00. 00 Inspection 50. 00 _ Total Sewer Fee !—n / 00 �Cz Building Permit = $321. 50 Plan Check = 160. 75 4W, State Surcharge 1.2. 86 495. 11 Less Pre-paid Plan Check - 160. 75 Total Permit Balance 334. 36 St:•eet Improvement Program & Assessment per Tigard Design Review of October 10, 1978 1 Parking Space requi^ed for each 1,000 sq. ft. of bldg. Building Area - 10, 200 sq. ft. = 10%4POlor 161 perking spaces required 5 $50. 00 each = SAD Site grading, paving & storm drainage permit - 60. 00 4% State Surcharge - 2. 40 TOTAL - - - - - - 6 orf G� .3 Sincerely , Edward T. Walden, Building Official FTW/pl W '�cE�P JA N .5 1979 Fir r°tecirr ofe C1/%g ti P.O.Box 4309 O °n 7904 N.E. 128 Ave. Vancouver, WA. 98662 N Bus. 206-256-4094 home 206-256-4519 December 30 1978 Mr. Ed Walden Building Official for City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: Reference plan check list prepared by you, dated October 27, 1978 National Safety Comnany for building permit, metal warehouse Tax Lot 4000 .81 acres Bonita Rd. Dear Ed: We have complied with Your checP list which was the reason you gave me for not issuino a building permit at the end of October 1978. Item #1 done: Method of anchoring guard rail furnished to you. Item#2 done: Pr;ginal footings desian rejected by You: redesigned footings for 1,8nO P.S.F. turned down again: we hired soil ennineer he nkay'd building site for 2,500 P.S.F. 10n� L .L. , D.L. which means orininal plans as submitted by V. Thomas our structural ennineer were correct because maximum weight of any one footing is under 2,50n f.S.F. Para #1 done: Structural steel plans together with engir.eerinq computer print out furni,'hed to you stamped by the third engineer which you requested us to retain. Para #2 done: Additional topo and site plan furnished: hydrant plan furnished as required by Tualatin ^ural Fire Protection District: additional drainage plan furnished: approval from B.N.R.R. furnished for drain ditch use. Para #3 done: Plan for driveway furnished: copy of County street bort', furnished: water for building will bp furnished by Tigard Water District. In lieu of we have the option to drill well ner State of Orevon law, no permit required. Tara #4 done: Not applicable, Unified Sevier Agency accepted Southwood Park Interceptor sewer and put it into operation in November, 1n7R. continued nage 2 RFCF/V 1�01 JAN - 51919 pane 2 �'��, Or TIG4RD Para ;15 done: We agree with you house sewer must he laid per 11)7P State !'lurching ^ode. Further clarification to be furnished when we apply for interior plumbing permit. We are confident you are in agreement with ahove. VIP would appreciate it if you will now issue a huildinq nermit so we car commence construction. Enclosed check for the followinu fees: Sewer fee $1 ,800. Development charge 5no. Metal whse valuation 80,nnn. hal . of permit fee 240. $2,540. If you are not in anreerrent, what item have we not complied with in regard to your October 27 , 1117S chr,., list �,ihich are reviewed ahove. 1�iith due respect to ,your position and our financial hardship because of the inordinate delays we would apnreciate a promnt written raply. "Psnectfully vv%urs, / Joe Wil son National Safety Company Ercls: checl, payable to City of Tigard for huildinn permit fees, $2,540. copy of building official , P. Malden plan check list, dated 27 Octoher ll i IRV'IN A. COOPER CIVIL ENGINEER December 25, 1978 OFFICE 2274123 REOIBTEPIED: WILLAMETTE BUILDING OREGON PORTLAND.OREGON 97204 WASHINGTON Recevro REs. 245.3453 NATIONAL SAFETY Co. .lAy - 5 i9i9 Route 1 Box 575 C"y Of TIGARD BeaVPiLon, OR 97005 Attn , : John Skourtes Plan Reviews 78-30 Res Proposed WAREHOUSE 7350 S.W. Bonita Rd. 'TL ' 4000 T259 R1 W, W.M. City of Tigard Subjects Fou•ldntion appraisal st lowland site to identify soil and outline procedure of upgrading building footing tearinq stratum. The property is a roughly triangular shape, extending southward from Bonita Road, straddled by two railroad .lines, situated or grades built up to elevation 151 .51 . A 144 ' contour traverses the 65n foot long x 1711%15' (1 .4 Ac . ) plot, the central sector proposed for a 109000 sq. ft. Warehouse# with finished floor at elevation 145 feet . An inspection at the site was conducted Decsmher 5 for the express purposes of Foundation Soil Appraisal . Preliminary excavation fnr perimeter footings had been made some weeks past and footing guide forms placed. Cessation of work and rovnges of wet weather were determined to have been factors causing_ appreciahle disintegration of the trenches . An earth fill with racked surface wag found to have sustained its initial sound placement, with minor exceptions . In assessment of the site status, with respect to suitability for the purpose intended, the following salient items are delineated for correction and implementations 1- Soil of the iron was identified as the typical unit of the Tualatin Vallsys CLAYEY-SILT, a fine-grained, dense, uniform stratum. 2- Fill material in place wag recognized as native soil, existing in an acceptable compacted state. 3- Excavation for perimeter footings had been made through the FILL to original firm so+.1 past weeks period of water accumulation from rinfa l have created a super- saturated condition in the trenches . PPge 1 STRUCTURAL DAMAGE APPRAISALS FOUNDATION SOIL INSPECTIONS Sf'RVEYS INVESTIGATIONS RECEIVED JAN m 5 1979 CITY OF TIGARD 4- Preparation for concrete placement will requires a- Extension of excavation to sound soil, & 6 inches wider. b- Backfill footing trenches with pit-run quarry rock (4" minus to include not less than 50% fines, 3/411 to Sand) -- up to Plan-designated elevation. 5- The FILL pad in place extends about three feet beyond perimeter footings = with ground slope at 10 considered to be less than stable. Notes Additional compacted FILL is recommended to be added at the perimeter, to redur_P the sur- face slope to 1 : 2 ( V!�A) 6- Existing drainage ditches outside the proposed building perimeter, currently vegetation lined, must be cleared to assure adequate runoff to the natural creek existing at the south sector of the plot (a tributary to Fenno Creek) . The procedure will upg, de the foundation stratum, permitting structural design to utilize soil load bearing capacity : 2500 Lbs . ier Sq. Ft . for 100'9 R.L.+L .L . It is recommended that concrete strength be specified by minimum cRment content of 51 sx. per cubic yard to assure a dense, high strength productf (30gp PSI ) for footings = 5 ax ( 7500 PSI ) for floor slnb. IACscc I. A. C666er c.c . s 2 Consulting 5nils/FnundAtion Engineer Page 2 of 7 •'i- l ' i' ,I FIRIDCK . .. �I1,»;.1.j ,' , I ►.In •, ,.• , I; "\7' r•als.• 1 . �a f. IfrOROr�:�'\`r :�•h� r: r ` W—�_. \ M�'^it, .. r'�+1 � •Y•,, �I•\ t►„ t � I -,� ,, f , \ -.I j,, .Tarx,lK,n.a�': •�� .� 1 r ! .; •( L INOM.NhtA Pi rwnon 9►a•' � m. I �r t 1 s. i u n�'• 1 _ ` s .••o^t�,.. �1 ��. �s , + .G'. .• •^ 8 ,;d p :a1'� ;: � •CHOMEN � � , • S d, i � .T,'. u•,o 1-i .�=-.+'`'i ,• -.i... .._ri1• y '•' +da+ All ►roams D-1 i'iii d• _ • �.+.�1 g r' •�i' _-. .M."j, :L+r� ^,�' rr• •• T. _ Municipol y .. ; �RI: I Y.� '�'. ..,r . - �► ' E PROGR " ' ' � %' ''wEsr-• �' ez,. 'I w. RE V D ESS `« 1rrd u K PORTLAND ^ ,•I..r. 5 S3 t" JAN All ( , , +• r+... . �F'- r rte; /J ��h . 1. IM. J ,r •ar;•S l; F P ' •'• �.. .�,�. " �� •E..l P •h �.. ,,, n •,,�,7 y uwwlr`1»,�., _ • fi �/ F-i'ulr., r :.F I"+r - CITYt e ^ ' IN era . wY+co L, ,I" iT Y,..rn•y OBINSON Ia „ Y.. •• ., nl �c. ",� .,z kr :�„ .+:Jn + , r. �i Y IN - r r n +nrtow•. n MET GER • ;'' 1;- .,;M+, - --1 ra=cw. r r -"— '�.!: 1, - t ,. m�nr t /r I 1 1 i 1 �� L� J7 + _•. f,.. �Y r.. _ _ _ ��1 ZIZ a ' • L _ �' ' i P � _ _ �?J 9'W �� __ 0"•n +. s• „ ' E 1 7 / 'c gra^ +��' _ 1.»»� , •� •, �• - SFr w .- , "i ,J; rm. '""a. i; 2 , •� VILLA dP. -'- - }'" llh_,. • ��(:;I r OREENB RO I e I i RIDQ Y I 'S1, r -�'�--_�• III!• io••or' •1 �II I : ' C f rorina f WEST PORTLAND 1 ,a. t n.•unt v a:.k y I " tn,.n kr PARK _U All EALIM ^ a rI, ,• alar 'Ih•o r.• 'UNTAINS '7 r• r, t ,�'• • a��•^nWs ,.;1 �blur., I ,r• 'Irl I � I Cl'AM�.S C� �RK �'4 •t�L.. va TIGARD .� r �' A,-_ ,�'�(`• 1 I r ?� .. tr � I i \�h+ia+ F �: ..��'+ rr +w � .�:r +"� �j '' � `� R+ a ✓I err,Iw r 4.. r. ,IMak • t-/� •Mat, 4" F •��Ntu—b 1�i Uwr , I I •o q.r,..• •a.� , ,• f• 1 I, ,N ,• �..I I „ N r L 1.M• r L • •• +a 1 ruM1. 15.x1 IT •+ j tr NN•# ' 1. N� 90.411A Mkllk r � '�•.1•Ir i�j.• ,1 .�' 'I's M _ 'u'nal� �1'n• 1 "•IsC Or.•te 6 •1 /// 1 1ZI._'IN oa• sI i, 6 w i i•♦ lI I ., ��;i... ....co•i r •..u., S n Mwr,Crut_..+ N�'/ . + 6 :L: fi •1 Il�•wrr. �_no_ ytwM�, r. re .J 1.•�rJ • •� .4 ^1 , .}III. �• ./'1• -^n.1� ql� " I, -Irtl +1»,r. �..�� I '1 ••OC•Yaoo a�•r+OM,�, m.�` � yl•nt ° v � �. I —� 1 I i ,.ap♦VI1. I,^ 1 I .y'' 1.Q f to •V i1. I '+ •• Y,._V! ,;• ` ••♦,V,• n �•..yi� +. V �N' / :fir• ROAD •a ine, Aj 1• s 1 .�.-. ..J (4LF,. s 'h ;,, = •.�a�.,� ans"I•Ir 7'7 `] •'+hrJ'+- ' I b Y•�W" f1() "' •'' j1�•1 °��,�•Y'„' "� ••-- W � p f c..IrT'..�` q„utnlin, ti., N rM `,4 t ,r j;," S.�6rw r. •�!t� sf.� JEAN 1 '•-kkri.• %' '`., ",(�A Ali•• .•11T1►'.." d t._�.rl _-•..I� I/ i � r +' / _ �� •07 �'.•�llts • "•°�' ;!�� ur rl tad'^! A 00 PURHAM �44 fi 1 ! Country Club i' "\ i•� = . i I� —\z• gLLr' c' i tvato UALATIN (pr vote) I .N ft + . sp n r ' .D •,� /r•I. 11 n�-�i•\ourL4�.J ° it r 1 I I t 1� '�I -_ i✓t -- i f i I:118500 d ;- iaMoo.• � ,��4`• 'P't.��• J:,,,_. : arN:;��i4� . i i l�� 0 - Ale"; t♦�,+„i rrw» i:�i �/°4� RIYERD •rh .^' a �y+o I C 0 �•, � y� / s w .ecpo to I r I j 1._ c„ f .',•,,� �a F7.x ' y .' r' h M's�� •Y�t�.NQlI�l.is f; ��1y�r� •.M1:!� r/t�9 ¢t` •i 7.. CLAI;KA11tA51 �•,,^�, � /. C- r" 43"\ A � -3�' s r0!��i'F wl«[�' I .�i� � y, :( .J � 1�•7 s�.;• .j I � n a;.'� � .�,� ,f., •� I ••'1 Igu� �� .l�r H9i: :r: ... f _ :17:�7 ? u !l� V D _ 217 'r4F.5 LI Aiith ny+'P y ,I:^� Qp` •E • #I P •wlu� •• •� I �• \\ J 1 Trete r� n re .:i •�:i I i';' +NA s»:iGi_ �;. ► • s ! / ,'•I w, •h:,h• % ••/ • �� e `� �``iar' r �"i:.:'• l D,I¢J}psRil•' - Y'" ` R� �, r�\/�;7,,/'�•'0�J�� aM , I t irr II•^� • .r / •i•/1 •\._�_r�rtw�' .. 'I) '� fiJ p, Jt. i \/ • ` / a•N Ila .I. Q• ilr 8W MELRL IE • .... N11, ..)Q •,�;'�..�'''•`••' ,��Va`�'�` \ 'r 11 I •`•I�'F".�1 _ r `!• _ II _ �ce.0 39 39 • r).•r r r_ •1.sltII r„ C� '� I rj l AIRV0�1 l I �, ��uy \ ✓r_ N r�' •• ::.��N. M•�SONALD•• "'P• •�•�,. -,�• `:'! �e " i / �' :I�� .•) � •' ,�S. •• �_.�a:�._ p -mak. - \�..r.,_. � � .� •u :�+� i!• - !L A 1 I' �• n :A01 i1$'�`� I - .��- �� I ] \' ... _ r� •II �;.•. .t , n ;'�.i� t ,� tl�• •II •r_• 81N"B�l1V/TA• • _Rb / _ 9i!oiN O lA• db' i • fi '�'�. � � ):ntia�. r• •I•s�a.11g! -3Pr"�"..—�� .� -S 'I. ,o �•� - rs `i- w tee WAII3. {`, •.' 41 _ '`• •�•• .i9W�• �AT�TLER R __ -- / � -"_ - r ....aQ� w e J_ .�' •• �J .:'II rlf"f' "._' - _ C L.r xa• ••..I,.i � • jo � •�• i. It jN IF � by • __"��'.➢_•I..,,�t�✓`J�.�/; • II n ^t`� I (�2�yi�� •• �I I�),c �1•h _ _ '.S, '�` _ / ;, ° 0 .• a m. 2 ,ITrAIIerP•ik N R ao �_. i t •• ' •� 12 •�� ' w 37 �� llt �, 66 NNN...fff... • h ^ �I 'gW, 7 viJRyA}vt � 10. ✓ROAD- �,I ° ^ ' war.' n ""✓ .� qM N93 �� I ._ .•• .I•, �• ° •� C. ree J f.1 , ikh Nch .• Durham. •. v, __ It Cook n cl �,..��. 3, � 2: / hof r� �••Gravel L Pitsl. n . ti/AI.ATIN - J�-Q�� : • I, e _ Pitr'. 1 `n: oe:`' .'�•: :s• v •" l-,.•"• ..1..=.. . ..! -,r, �j,�' / ;� 4y'E•' rev! O •��.. .11,.. It 6� 1g,� ' I D'' •Gravel ( W 1 • 1.��• £AN•. At ! \\ H//,Y \. TLi/'I•I 13u Pll _ II • •� �il, - , \J\ • 'I� II ,�— • � !�/Cis ,. •. I w. . •II ,AZEI°") -"'..►� / /O� a /9 �. ,ly�� l i KER/N1�.a-'.>;e• 2_•91 .,t._-ate �� Mlle 10\' - � I I � 1 =='v •;� Q'�,L[�'W� - - 71 Ill A T I N y ;• Cabo . ,d 1, y -7-1 e L ATtNi AD•;•� 'If • W.nuna E... � • ,1 C«nlC 0 U N - YC'L u 8 P •Mei• t=�jva ,` g .. '•• r yy '•: I 11 - y • - I ' it i • ,I,.,r�� a -- P CI ICI Perk,S\ 0 % BrMfle , •.. OW,,- H1,.•',H, r •i I• 'I. , d-% U4C�.Q I _•T.7 ;- RM 1 J 212 I z �. p —_:._~�--•��• if'UL 0�j, I I, ND U, I, / _ •- a'ts IV ';� ,. ! '•Tuttl:ltjhi! � �_ -n w � . _�' i-"'� cul. Nrfyrfi S •hLLCTh'!ttF •� ��+ r''� II u it M i December 4, 1,978 Mr. Clyde W. Centers State Fire Msrehal Dept. of Commerce :103 Laborj& Tndustries Bldg. Salem, Oregon 9"310 Oppr Mr. Centers; I have received your lstte7 of November 2,,4 , 1978 to D. Fisher of Fisher, Wallin & Long r9yarding Pacific Yard Service Bullrlingr Plan Nf:view 9-7( . We co nr.ur with your findlnos And interpretations, as noted in yuur letters, fur the Warehuu3e and OfficF sres. Sincerely, l � dwerd T. Walden Tigard Building official ETIJ/pl cc. to Mr. Devid D. F !sher, AIA Architricts 220 IJater Tower 5331 SW Macadam Avenue Portland, Orajon 97201 _E _ __ I Otto H.VanWalstijn, P.E. RECEIVED IJOV � r 1978 � VAN WALSTIJN CONSULTING ENGINEER C1TY 1 Civil/Structural TIGARD 610 S.W. Broadway Building, Room 602 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 222-3452 November 1'7,, 1978 711bi-nt: Proposed building for Netinnal Safety C0, 9 City of Tir-ard 1!'4PO S.W. Main Tip,erd , Oregon 97PP3 Att: ^4r. Ed Walden: .:ear Ed ; In November 10 I rpoeived a telephone call from the builder of Abivn nroject. In his telephone conversation he questioned my rnnnrt dated November 8, 1978 rezardinp the foundation. I PxnrPgsPd to him that he has shown no understanding of enrinee ring goience at all and recommended him that ant* verbal technical advice Phould ro through his erfrtneer ^ir. Th-mas. Tip nlapstioned the prn ject Dickenson where "OOn psf soil bearinc- vies '1sel 9nd that I was the project enr�inaer. I reminded him that his Dlans show n,) sntisfacto.ry technical information to substantiate a 7000 psf rnv.LsPd later to ?000 psf and no engineering calculations ws� rp furni^hr-d on the dQsirn of the footings or explanation on the benrtnp vatuA assumption. I Assume that the City and myself are not in business to give free Advise on the design of the project. I would be willing to direct mr. Thomas to U.B.C. chPpter P9 table P9-B and footnote 1. It is a pity to have to explain an engineer the code to that extend to obtain a soilbear. inp value of 1500 psf Der example. However to prevent- the City end myself to take responsibility on the design of the project the oroject engineer should document his design criteria and not blindly accept suap.estions we mitzht make. Also the conversation of the contractor was threatening and very unmannered that, I will refrain to have any direct conversations with him in th-, future and instead relate any technical advice directly to his drsipn enrinear. Sincerely o.ji. vP,' Walsti,jn. • VAN WALSTI.IN CONSULTING ENGINEER Cit'il/stl aural 610 S.W. Bruadwav Building, Suite 603 Portland, Orcgo n 97205 (503) 222-3452 Job _Pr�r� build inr,,_ for National Safety Co. _ Job Number _ __—` Date November S, 197" Subject; Telephone Call C7 With Conference with _ Field Observa!ion With Ed Walden of the Ci. ;y of Ti-:ird 9 1973 I hsve made an inspection trip to abave �-nt site and observed the following;: V-vv '^tion and bttildintr floor was excavated., leveled and form(-d fir finnrIntion and floor construction. The excavation at the �r ori footi•,r?s showed roots at bearing: level. The prepared i'1.,) ,r sitrf:-icP ghowel vegetation covered with an a.verere of one i.nn`i thick hroii-ht in granular material. Tt PnrP,,rs that site was never stripped.off for top soil and triton rmoh as rrrnss and weeds. }. is, n,v. ronnmmpndntton to require the following sitework before f'-,un ' pti on wnr!c cnn be permitted: i , ' Q'InvID fill nTrnnic material and top soil from Areas under 1);ai.7.di m, pnd, ngv-d areas. 1111 -steripl to consist of a free draining; granular material. ' 1.paPnr,rt of the fill to be done under the supervision of a ^oi. t onrin eAr. Soil onpineer shall also direct the method of 14 -u of Above fill rn iterial the soil engineer can rPcor-riend > rise in sitr' material if in his opinion suer is ncceptn h1e. T -1 ,--h to (1irect you to UDO chF ter 29 sect. �' p .(a) k soil investi-rtt nn and e report of r. attsfantory placement of fill, both ar.c �pt ;l lr t, thn 1111ildina Official , shall be submitted. n-irip is State level and should be enforced to 'Protect life nd :)r-,'•',rty. Ae nlso section 2905 ( a, 'b, a and f) r Distribution _(�- IV 4 - M I - - - - TO THE ELECTED OFFICIALS: City of Tigard UATEU: November 6, 1978 In answer to letter written by John Skourtes of November 4, 1978, to the elected Officials, City of Tigard, regarding building site at 7380 S.W. Bonita Road, TigF.rd. Plan Check Report on the National. Safety Built inp: Sate and Plans dated October 27, 1978. On October 19, plans given to City employed structural Engineer, Otto Van Walstijn; his report received on October 25th, which stated certain deficiencies in the plans. On October 31, Vic ThomaF and Joe Wilson came into the office. They informed me they were representinf.; John Skourtes for the National Safety project on. Bonita Road. I gave them each a copy of the Plan Check report and went over the plan deficiencies. Vic. Thomas has since supplied certain structural corrections which is now in the hands of the City's Structural Englneer Plan Cjtiecker. The Structural Engineer, Vic. Thomas, has now shown his footing design to he based on 2,000 1bs. per sq. ft. , for. which the C.tty will still require a soils test to verify the stability and value of the f'.11 area where the building is to be placed, as to whether the existing soils will <<ipport the 2,000 lbs. per sq, ft. Item 4b2 of the Plan Check has not beem complied with. The City has not received any new drawings showing Item lit request- or the second half of Item #3. Item 63 has not beem com;. li.ed with regardless of what Skourtes' letter of Nov. 4th says. Item #4 has not been complied with. Skourtes has made an illegal. connection to the Southwood Park Intercoupler sever without a permit. Now, in addition to all of the above, Skourtes has been served with three (3) citations, and is scheduled to appear in Municipal Court Tuesday, November 7, 1978, at 7:00 P.M. Page 2 - To the Elected Officials One is for grading and filling without a permit; one for starting construction without a permit, and one for conneLt.ing to the sewer main lateral as provided by U.S.A. without a permit. In addition, a Stop Work Order was legally posted at the job site - 7380 S.W. Bonita Rd., on October 24, 1978. Skourtes removed the Stop Work Order, as witnessed by Mr. Alan Mickelson, and has since been observed doing form work at the job site. (See attached Sections from U.B.C. regarding Stop Work Notices. CITY OF TIGARD Building Official E. T. Walden /br BURLINGTON NORTHERN 1101 N.W. Hoyt Street P. 0. Box 571 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT Portland, Oregon 97207 National Safety Company October 30 , 1978 Route 1 , Box 57 511 P,eaverton , Oregon 9700S Attention : Dir. john Sl.otirtes Gentlemen : I wish to confirm a conversation , review and agreement reached between your Mr . ,John Skourtes and Roadmaster John Espinosa this morning relative to a drainage situa- tion near rigard in Oregon. At that time , it was mutually agreed you have the right to deliver the surface runoff to the drainage ditch extending along the edge of our oper- ating right of way and that there would be no problem in handling the normal runoff. We also spoke about -. --,quest for an easement on railroad property upon which to construct , maintain and utilize a water line and we reviewed this matter with you. It is not the policy of this company to grant easements for util- ity lilies to private individuals . Very truly yours , L J . G ;(Iwards Sut rintendent INC/mbm National Steel Products Company Subsidiary of Shmn National Steel Corporation The other woy to build LETTER OF CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: DATE:_ October 27, 1978 This is to certify that the Stran basic components as indicated on Stron erection drawings incorporated in the building described below have been designed for the loads specified in accordance with good engineering practice utilizing the following recognized standards where appropriate: MBMAAIS.C,, A,I.S.I,, A.W.S. Additions and deletions of indi- vidual ports as well as the non-standard use of stan . . . ., , .dard components or ports is not covered by this certification and is the responsibility of the local builder. (Any exceptions ore rioted below.) - ohn Skourtes NA lUIE1]E:B 1ODRR6x 575 —._— AAII.. 1 BUILDER B CUSTOMERS ADDRESS - Beaverton, Oregon NA TE TO BE ER EC O AT _ _— Tigard, ara"'PTION Op BUILDI_ND SMT 60 - 16' EH, 150' length (6 @ 25') 1:12 SMW 24 - 14' EH, 50' length (2 ® 25') 1:12�-.— -_--v---_ -- BEAD LOAD"- 2.03 OAb2.03 ps_f_(to frames)_ _ 30 pef —_—'----�— LIVE LOAD TO FRAMER - WIND LOAD OTHER LOAD! 30 pef 20 pef _ _None LOAD COMB.NATIONB }li .-f- i'-TSL ;— -' BTRAN JOB OR QUOTE NUMBER - ---- DL+LL/2+WVLL;ITDLL+WIJLLJ/2+LL H8-23213-HX —ME AND TITLE NATIONAL STEEL PRODUCTS COMPANY - MANUFACTURER 00 pJ. William Reesch r e P.E. 1. Builder is responsible for providing for the lateral support of the inside and outside flange of the rigid frame column at standard girt and flange brace locations for the open-common wall condition. 2. The 1'-6 roof extension is to be attached to the load type 3 bearing end frame of the SM 60 and the load type 2 bearing end frame of the SMW 24. 3. Wing unit purlins must be erected lip-to-lip and lapped per 2T201. dPR 8678 *' r' ortirorr cc D M 9�h z M Zielinski 12 i P. o Box 40490 cHouston, Texas 1V1CC1»110ch_ �i<<%4M Wt'," Cable "Stran" Telex(40762-979 713 22I t B T. "I A PLAN CHECK REPORT - October 27, 1978 Re: National Safety Company Structural EnginEiur Thomas Proposed Building for John Skourtes at 721BO SW Bonita Rd. Tigard Plans as prepared by Thomas Consulting Engineers. Plans Review by City of Tigard Building Official : ( Item #1) Fire Life Safety Review was completed by Department of Commerce, Salem #78-320. Tigard Building Department agrees with these findings and that the plans be revised to show required, Roof Coverings, Guard Rails at Ramps and method of anchorage, and a statement that this is to be a B-2 occupancy only. Per Item "C" of the review. Copy enclosed of the Fire Life Safety Check. ( Item #2) Structural Safety Review was completed by 0. Van Walstijn Structural Engineer. City of Tigard Building Department agrees with the findings of Engineer. Therefore, the city will r-quire a Soils Engineers report to substantiate the use of the high value for allow- able soil bearing of 3000 P.S.F. Existing fill now indicated under the foundation was placed without a city building permit as required by Chapter 70 of U.B. trade. Following list of items required by City of Tigard Building Depart- ment per City ordinances. #1 The City will require 2 comple .e sets of drawings of the Steel Building. Each sheet to beer an �7dprjved professional Engineer' s stamp, and such drawings to be re iewEd by the City 's Consulting Engoneer. In addition the city w .11 require proof that the Struct- ural Steel items to be used at tFa job site are indeed manufactured by Strand Steel as drawings indi� ate. #2 Required that Site Plan draw ng Eiccura'ely shows the location of the potable water to be supplied and the location of piping and fire hydrants as required by Tualatin Fire Department, also all building and site drainage. Plans indicat.'.ng how stor,.i water will be deliv- ered to natural drain areas. If drainage is to be accomplished by using adjacent property some document showing approval by adjacent property owner , and how storm water will be drained from ramps. #3 Documents showing that water wil'. be furnis!;ed to building site for potable water and fire hydrant b;/ Tigard Wa `.er District. 'See attached letter from Water District. clans acceptable to the City of Tigard Public Works Department and '_'ashington County showing details of elevations, fill, concrete, asphalt, width, and any other requirement for entrance and exiting fr,.li! Bonita Road to property. An approved drawing by Washington r',ounty end copy of street bond is acceptable evidence. #4 Per attached letter from U.S.A. Sewer District : The existing lateral from Southwood Park Intercepter iL to be exposed and capped until sewer contractors work and tests are ;.,ccepted by U.S.A. agency. #5 That existing House Sewer now laid without a permit be relaid per State Plumbinq Code requirements. , Sec. 317, Sec. 315, Sec. 318 , Sec. 406, Sec. 407 and Chapter 11., SPc. 1106 (h) for bed material , City of Tigard approved material is not less than 4." depth of 3/4 minus - See U.S.A. agreement. Approved materials include asLestos cement , non-pressure pipe ASPM #428-74. See Table A Chapter 2, See Sec. 1104 for marking of all pipe and material. Edward T Walden Tigard Building Official ETW/pl Enclosures 1, October 27, 1978 National Safety Company Route 1 Box 57511 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Board of Dir.ctoss 1} Tualatin Fire Rural Protection District P.O. Box 284 Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Subject: Fire Protection Tax Lot 4000 (7750 S.14. Bonita) Vv Project: Construct 10,200 Sq. Ft. metal building, occupancy light hazard - no other structure within 140' . Gentlemen: Facts Existing h;drant:s (hose laying distance to building) Hydrant "A" 440' from buildings structure Hydrant "B" 460' from buildings structure Each hydrant at this location has the capacity to deliver 4,000 G.P.M. water flow- or total water flew 8,000 G.P.M. Requirements for building structure at this location 2,200 G.P.M. Each fire. truck in the district carries 1,200 Ft. of hose. 1) the above distance are within the standards set forth by N.F.P.A. which have been adopted by ordinance on January 1977 by the Board of Directors of the District to be "effective within the boundaries of the District." 2) To accommodate one of your employees in the fire District Mr. Greulich, we would be prepared to install a hydrant 100 Ft. closer if thiF - could be accomplished, However the Tigard Water District a separate governmental agency states that they will not tap their line at this location in order for another hydrant to be installed. 3) Insurance Rating Services of Oregon has rated the proposed strur' -ere the lowest rating_possible for, buildings within the fire District based or, the two hydrants currently in existence to service this location. For your information this is the body which sets fire risk standards for all commercial and industrial buildings in Oregon. The fire marshall has attempted to force the apolicant to adopt to standards that are legally untenable.. 'rhe authority that has the taxing power to provide the services sets the standard (gee point #1 above) . Because the fira hydrant standards enumerated above for the fire District have not been violated employee of District then atlt:Empts to throw another road block to applicant. He pulls out of tho N.F.P.A. standards a trick phrase, "fire marshall can demonstrate that fire fighting operations would be impaired." The pertainent wording in this phrase "can demonstrate" means the fire marshall must furnish absolutes rot theories or opinions where the preponderance of the evidence can support the "can demonstrate clause." Train will cut hose. Question how can .you demonstrate the following: 1) Tt,.o trains will simultaneously reach Bonita Rd. at the same time. 2) Building will be on fire at time both trains are passing Bonita Rd. 3) Fire district dispatcher cannot radio ahead. 4) When fire District dispatcher radios ahead to both train engineers neither of the train engineers receives the message. Remember alltrain engines today have two way radio communications. 5) Fire District personnel fighting fire wi"1 not be able to find 30 seconds to spare wherein they can trench between the ties to pull at least one of the hoses under the track. 6) No two trains cross this site simult;aneouly becp.use a mile North of this location S.P. and R.N. tracks merge into one single track. Therefore the railroads schedule accordingly. 7) Light traveled tracks (branch lines) . Four ;;rains daily two on each Wr track and switching engines. 8) Fire intensity will be such that pumper truck water supply will be inadequate. As you will note all of the aL)ve occurring simultaneously are at best improbable. No appeal board can rule on the "can demonstrate clause" because no mortal sole including fire marshall is qualified to compute gambling odds . Sumisation: We have spent months and hours and hours of time and monies on this natter attempting to show fire marshals the real world but to no avail . We must insist that the I Board of Directors either i0c truct fire rnarshall to lay off or sue us immediately in Circuit Court. In all of our dealings with the fire marshail he has been polite and we appreciate this, however enough is ennu5h. We are confident that the purpose of a Fire District i,, to work with the tax paying citizen within the District rather than obstruct citizenswith unrealistic der,ia. ds that serve no meaningful purpose. Sincerely yours, National Safety Company c.c. Editor - "iigard Times Community Press Mavor - City of Tigard CEI VEU _. , JAN - 5119 Cct.ober 27 , 1978 /9 PLAN CHECK REPORT - C� Re: National Safety ':ompany Structural Engineer ThomasOF I�akU ProposeH Building for John Skourtes at 7380 SlJ Bonita Rd. Tigard Plans as prepared by Thomas Consulting Engineers. Plans Review by City of Ti ;:jrd Building Official : uo�Item #1) Fire Life: Safety Review was completed by Department of Commerce, Salem #78- 20. Tigard Building Department agrees with O k-a these findings and that the plans be revised to show required, Roof Cove ings , Guard Rails at Ramps and method of anchorage, and �Ott a statement that this is to be a B occupancy only. Per Item "C" of the review. Copy enclosed of the Fire Life Safety Check., Item fir') Structural Safety Review was completed by 0. Van Walstijn Structural Engineer. City of Tigard Building Department agrees with the findings of Engineer. Therefore, the city Will require a Soils q ? S� Engineers report to substantiate the use of the high value for allCiLl- � p' able soil hearing of 3000 P.S.F . Existing fill now indicated under the Foundation was place jithout a city bu.i.ldinq permit as required Ly Chapter '70 of U .B. Cone. Following list of items required by City of Tigard Building Dep-,rt- �� meet per City ordinances. / #1 The City will require 2 complete sets or drawings of the Steel Eluilding. Each sheet to bear an approved professional Engineer' s stamp, and such drawings to be reviewed by the City ' Cons�.ltiny Engoneer. In addition the city will require proof that the Struct- ural Steel items to be used at the job site ere indeed manufactured by Strand S'..ael as drawings indicate. e I cqo #2 Required that Site Plari drawing accurately shows the location of the potable water to be supplied and the location of piping and fire " hydrants as required by Tualatin Faire Department , also all building !(Lh.N and site drainage. Plans indicating haw storm water will be deliv- ered to natural drain areas. If drainage is to be accoyllshed by using adjacent property some document showing approval. try adjacent property owner, and how storm uater will be drained from ramps. #3 Documents showing that water will be furnished to building site for potable water and fira hydrant by Tigard Water District. Sec attached letter from Water District. Plans acceptable to the City n of Tigard Public Works Dapartmpnt and Washington County showing details of elevations , fill , concrete, asphalt, width, and any other requirement for entrance and exiting from BonitaWRoadto property. =on County and copy of street bond is An approved drawing by Washingt acceptable evidence. #4 Per attached letter from U.S.A . Sewer District: The existing lateral from Southwood Park Intercepter is to be exposed acid capped "i until sewer cdntractors work and tests are accepted by U . S. A. agency. ul, , VEQ JAN _ ,5 5 19,9 CITE' OF tlf,,gkU #5 That existing House Sewer now laid without apermit per State Plumbing Code requirements. , Sec. X17 be relaid t vDINI>Iw(� Sec. 406, Sec. 407 and Chapter 1.1 , Sec. 1106 ' Sec. 3.15, Sec. 3181 No'f �G1u City of Tigard approver, material is not less b) for bed material , minus - See U.S.A . agreement. n than 4 depth nF 3�4 !^ o, L cement, non-pressure Approved materials include asbastos oP � See Sec. 1104 For masking of all. See Table A Chapter 2, P material . CIQ lot r l�N Edward T Walden ri Tigard Building Official E TI,!/p 1 Enclosures Unified Sewerage Agency of Washivgg ;tri County 150 N. First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 503 648--8621 October 24, 1.978 City of Tigard Y.U. Box .23557 1.2420 S .W. Main Tigard, OR 97223 Attention : Mr. . Ed Walden Gentlemen: According to the agreement between the city of Tigard and Unified Sewerage Agency , the city has the responsibility for issuing connection permits within its limits . The Agency has not issued a pei- mi.t or granted permission verbally to Mr. John Skourtes to connect to our Southwood Park trunk line tinder construction along S .W. Bonita Road near 74th Avenue . As a condition for acquisition of the easement from Mr. Skourtes , we were providing a shallow lateral for his future use . The Southwood P^r;c Interceptor has not been completed by the contractor or accepted by the Agency , and no connections should be allowed until it has been. Very truly yours , Donald E . Schut. Division Engineer. DESlcb CITATION TO APPEAR IN COURT IN THE Municipal Court of the City of Tigard, Oregon CDt ❑ District Court of the State of Oregon, O County of Washington z Justine Court of the State of Oragon, County of Washington City of Tigard, VS State of Oregon, VS �o 'J NAME � V I I 'b N /�C a o'r C �j wa _RES.ADD. ��_/�r �S'Ci�t ..'S �'� �� Mroe�e '�f►3 ,r� PHONE �{ CITU ��rS STATE 0- BUS.AGD. /ti"?� ✓ �.d•��( J"7 `.,` �y -�`� 1 1�7t / PHONE k-4/9 -A0 t CITY eta. STATE DOB _ ' HT. rlc� WT. T( , EYESi SEX HAIR RACE 4 OKR..LIG.OR SOC.SEC.No. -'i° ON T11Eflo- • b •� �) E 1197 RT7t'1g17C11" A N'LAWFULLV COMMIT THE OFFENSE OF: YOU HAVE BEEN ARRESTED BY POLICE OFFICER _ RIVATE CITIZEN A COMPLAINT OR INFOf 11ATION❑ BEEN HAS FILED AGAINST YOU IN THE ABOVE(NO. WN ILL AMED COURT. ❑I BE YOU nl?[CITED TO APPEAR IN COURT r-- DAY OF 197 LMUNICIPAL Community Center,Center, 8045 S. W. Commercial, —' COURT Tigard, Oregon - DISTRICT R°om - ----__�� COURTS Flf1Or, C°u►t youse,Sar ontl Main Streets, Hlllaboro, Oregort/rJ7' %t; pr`• JUSTICE COURT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 SERVED A CQPY OFTH NAMED DEFENDANT. IS CITATION ON THE ABOVE _:rR OFFICERDA ---- �E This citation Is not a complelrrt READ anInformation. nfo CAREFULLY One may be tiled and you will be pro• f vldad a copy thereof at the tlmP of your firstappearance.You MIDST appear In court at the time set In the citation. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AND A COMPLAINT On INFORMA- TION HAS BEEN FILED,THE COURT WILL IMMEDIATELY ISSUE A WARRANT'OR YOUR ARREST, IN ADDITION,YOU MAY BE CHARGED WITH THE CRIME OF WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR. POLICE COPY CITATION TO APPEAR IN COURT IN THE Municipal Court of the City of Tigard, Oregon n C> _J 0— District --•District Court of the State of Oregon, f ] County of Washington QO Justice Court of the State of Oregon, County of Washington City of Tigard, VS State of Oregon, VS I NAME `� _ ��//��,,e� (nm� (rroeLe RES.ADD. J`C. I C1X 1 PHONE U3 z CITY A STATE Q#j%----, z_ US.ADD(. �--�'t it PHON 6E B TY 4.WL1� LAV" STATE CI ^� 7 II DJB ( - )L -,}1 HT• ,c U WT. I�U EYES SEX x GUS,,,,(r—OR p HAIR RACE t-A_) SOC.SEC.No. 7S� ON T"e— ` 11 �C. 197OU DID AT� Q_ AhDID NLAWFULLV COMMI r OU s THE OFFENSE OF: I YOU HAVE BEE ARRESTED POLICE OFFICER '�—G� I PRIVATE CITIZEN A COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION B�gjy NAMED COURT, YOU IN THE ABOV WILL (NO. )Q BE r 1 YOU AR CITED TO APPEAR IN COURT AT 7 /� ' M ON THE +� (' 1'A C.)C.t P 6 C 1'c... 197 DAV OF MUNICIPAL Community Center, ,j"dA fftEi T>fr"' COURT Tigard, Oregon / Y� �C 1 �,rt J Z• DISTRICT RQ9}IT1 SXIu"IIBFffStlr, CourtJ�o useoi�/;/�� COURT Main Streets, Hillsboro, Oregon/�/�"r � / JUSTICE COURT 1 FIEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 SERVE A C V OF THIS CITATION ON THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT. DA. E FILER BADGE R4:AO CAREFULLY This citation is not a complauit or an mformatfoo.One may be filerl and you will be pro- vided a copy thereof of 111P tlrne of your fust apoearaoce.You MUST appear In tour: t the time set Iri the citalmo IF YOU FAIL.TO APPEAR AND A COMPLAINT OR INFORMA TION HAS BEEN FILED,THE COURT WILL IMMEDIATELY ISSUE A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST. IN ADDITION,YOU MAY BE CHARGED WITH THE CRIME Of WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR. rOLI('F ne a CITATION TO APPEAR IN COURT IN THE U Municipal Court of the City of Tigard, Oregon n p u C-tel Dia`rict Court of the State of Oregon, A County of Washington -1 Justice Court of the State of Oregon, Cour,*,, of t.ashington City of Tiga•'d, VS State of Oregon,VSt- NAME kuw*S ` o 4 �� io�Q.r1c 1 LAe (rlReT) (MIDbLe) RES.ADD. /��{ �{ , ,,,< 7S PHONE 6(f '-2.0 CITY sr 's1 STATE (} BUS.ADD. I G Ji If NE7Z77— CITY STATE 6 r`-ja(*j1-j DOB 7-_f.-2-3 HT. +lfU 11T. ~/() EYES SEX —QP.R.Lit-OR �a?.so9 X, HAIR RACE SOC.SEC.No. 197 7 A. moutrT *rr- 7 3 90 SICU G50�1•�. ja rdUNLAWFULLY COMMIT THE OFFENSE OF, / stilt r YOU HAVE SEEN ARRE L],11-�7 I, POLICE OFFICER ats PRIVATE CITIZEN A COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION n HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST YOU IN THE ABOVE WILL NAMED COURT. (NO. )❑ BE sl ,O J i YOU A CITED TO APPEAR IN COURT AT_ r / M. ON THE DAY OF --- LJ � r" h••-.• ,197 C7 MUNICIPAL Community Center, t %.21, COURT Tigard, Oregon �I�V ��77 d s, DISTRICT RQFim7t72;3ltOfKf,eerrCourtHousajgcon�'*I �d��• COURT Main Slreels, Hillsboro, Oregon, A (J 7J JUSTICE COURT I HEI4EBY CERTIFY THAT I SERV&P A COPY OF TfI S CITATION ON THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT. -- DATE OFFICER � BA E READ CAREFULLY This citation Is not a complaint or an Intormatlon.Onc may be flied and you will be pro- vided a copy thereof at the fling of your first app«arance.You MUST appear In court at the time set In the citation. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AND A COMPLAINT OR INFORMA- TION HAS BEEN FILED,THE COURT Wit L iMMEOIATELY ISSUE A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST. IN ADDITION,YOU MAY BE CHARGED WITH THE CRIME OF WILLFUL. FAILURE TO APPEAR. POLICE COPY October 23, 1976 Mrs, John Skourtas F;ationGI Safety Company `route 1 - box "7tih Ileaverton, CrLL;on :•700:, Lcar Sir: LnCIOSbd is copy 06 Plan Lhock for Structural !jijuty per U.G.C. ruquireme.-its. Us ars returning your plana and drawings for curruction. When curructud as requireci, plLuse, return fur r incl chork by Structural Lnyinser. Youre try.ly, Eduard To Us den Building Official r TL//p l Enclosures RECEIVED OCT 2 51978 'r,r,nced i,uildin- for NATIONAL SAr'r;P'f C.). _ CITY OF TIGARU City of Tirnrd ';trueturnl Plan Check 1 . Fiunr'At.ion r*en-n!rnl; r'.eneral notes call for nllowable soil henrinr of W)() ps f. W30 ? ')r1F; 'Provide Arta to substanti ntr: the use of higher vnlues sot firth in table no. ?9-B E,ri r!ti.nr- fill. apppnrs not to hp Placed in accordance 1,,Ath nocopted pnrvinpprtn orne"ttee. 9ubmitt i4fornotion on this fill in to rp^novnl or eo•npaction to ,iake it suitable for bParinfr. npsinn pnr,inPPr (L.Y. Thomas, shnll incorporatri on his plans the dpgir*r informntion for the steel suppr structure soch as; A. Tvnn of frAne end their loads and reactions. ( two types aLternatine* h. No infnrmntion is supplied on the 24' X 50' portion. c. 0hnrr' gtrPgg forces at east side is interrupted at the "4' X 10+ portion. ;how detail or explain. d . Unless ;trnn-Steel "shop drawinf-s" are. certified by an Oregon cPrtiftne nrofesgtonnl enrrine^r the plans shall contain ade_;u^tA infor!:ation to interpret the steel supersti ucture standard cn;-t- nperinr data. This includes calculation for vertical rand lntor•i1 lnn4tnr*. ( shear cnoncity to bre shown on plans) 7henr c»pncity information by St,ran-Steel is 140 plf whrn netual shnnr in higher at some walls and diaphrar-m ( 175 plf ) I VAN WAL.STIJN CONSULTING ENGINEER tr _ as?r• _._z___ ___OAT9!DDI,.__.23 -4 6JO _ 1 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL CLIKNTCity of i' Pry_—_ _ PORTLAND.OREGON 287.8401t National. Safet.y Co. i yf . ti!, �y' • � f_ttY r ,.. :rr +Ir*�/ v' ,LrAk. •e .r-L : C - ., 1�';",r't:"•�• :►,r _ - ��.' � '''plf�+�'��'+.,,,,,r " •' '•'' -74.t '+..`�y>'.'.M?y .E,..}'9'r�°' �"`r�,T'o'i`'•.Ir:a ,Ji�� .f",r++'��+ ,�,��`."S + -`>-Y:,O}„yV� ,� '7.'y.S+l='F �� ``� S�� , •Y - 'b'�v'•� err u,.,t�� i •l"i it �`" ^ .4 1 r •flT't,1y.+-,y, ME f • _ y J ti - K, 7•. �..�'a:.l�s'�r-.kyrT' vim..._ c•*�-!r: ..•ec-t,\.., fn i is yt�"i t r. t ns• 31 .• . , .!�' '.•r �'�T .,.�.xs ti �1 rye— ��j�• .� �5.� •t,. Y 1•. C Zi..r ''f41►�Z' � acr+.E �•&�•` 'fw4i.,fie�.-�'fy�,•w �`'��a •• � ;,� - �w t,x.•+••+^', -(;,�*»L''�'! y`' F �^+�1�+1�� YrI'X �� "�''y!'+„r' �3�; �;Ir •: ". ... r"AMM`LIe� ` d UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 29-0 ;"'✓�' '` 'r��`��' 1 LTABLE NO.29-B•—ALLOWABLE FOUNDATION AND LATERAL.1 ,,,".�:r , ► ' ..r r 1 + PRESSURE f .. I-:,t-.- ,;�-� ��yw y{�','"rWr+a."'�r; •�J► 1 LATERAL .•> 'A•'•drr:� '✓ ' F Al. REARiNO �.r-- '...::....t ,• '7' „�t �" .ley 't•,y; •��i' �1 :'>�f"r-w• i s ABLE LBSISO A • iOUNDA. FT.IFT OF RE-' - i �. :O^'7'Ir'fw"..aC. Z'+•i: ••s'1. f t TION nFUR TAN!'E _,C• ti• �.,,� ;_2-i. PRES5URE NATURAL COEFFI• LB5,50. Z•► �,�F✓"i1 ,, , CLASS OF MATERIALS' LOS SO.FT. cRAOE CIENT FF' • I "s" I. hlax+iveCry+lallinu dlxcl I-INI .71) v " ' '� Ii Bedrock Z, Sedimentary and 2000 Fohwcd Rt1�A �. �'F' I i ), Sandy Gravcl and;or 2000 I 21x) JS �' •f _ C;rasel((iW and GP) ` J 4, Sand.Silly Sand, ISf>n I30 5 ... ;T r Y , •� I1 s C'layry Sand,Silty -4: _ �; civ' I ' I Gra+cl and `.'.. It.�i Gravel(S%% SN. SSI, r Y '1 Ch1 and GC) SCI ' /�--1 1 • ' '� �•=' -+''� �I '; S. Clay.Sandy Clay,S111,v 1000 ! IU.1 I uI Clay and('layey Sill v (CL,ML,PIH and CHI -- t i I i i; 1 Lateral bearing enu lateral siid,aa resistance may be combined. 1, `+- a {t l r )� ill Il II 'For soil classifications OL,OH and Pl li.e.organic clays and Pest),a 10-In T T_ Rei ,..: tit f dation investigation shall be required. t1� rFlet'"^ :f !i iii I I IAq values of allowable foundation pressure are for fallings having a <' j� 1�; -t ,•"y Z E l minimum width of It inches and a minimum depth of I2 inchrs lino natural t grade, Except as in ' below, increase of 20 percem allowed for each tial' _' +' i dinonai Fool of width and/or depth to a masimum value of three times the a.. � rl..;. '' r drsignatedvalue. r �,r' +. '•'"s i I I X 'isolated poles, such as flagpoles or signs and poles used to suplsoll illicit- ; •• 't moi,j� �'� s ,',�•� r� 4 ,� I 'l'' � clmcd buildings or agricultu,at and light industry buildings which arc uW adversely affected by a !.inch motion at ground wrfaie berauve of ^"k:• �++ar. -'r }SII �l' he designed usin lateral bralin vulue+rgnal 4j short term lateral loads maya a _ ., '�• '" 'rA `�j'~�-:�' o-r` xl { I to two times the tabulated values. �..H'. `Coefficient to be multiplied by the dead load. Frictional value to be multiplied by he contract area.1n no rase 03111 he Iric- p tional resistance exceed one•half the dead load. +> '_. A, , r'd i 3• I t 'No increase for width is alto-ed. • 'fir ~'�'�2�+�..,;-,�� . �,. I' i f� nye M'wt tf.�''�..� ,' ;'�J:•j 1.12,`�V:)•'• ,�,i, I'-trt-try- .t'.a. ti• !;-� ,. '•.t •�, : J•t is.'1�1.r�,:�: T.� *`j �l + ti cr' c•:d1F�f 5�,( n }.f(.�^�•T'.Y."'M'sC `�.�:+ 1a�y�, r .?h 4 `tTY2^"+�c1� rw _+`'• ;,W t1 } '► is�'' �'' a . + r _ r - :d�Ttl' t•: +at" ,�t£C;••,rq,ssY'..hnh' -.r� ./� ��.,,�,.,..� 1•'^4� `J� '"P'.7��''��`�4t'��' �.•..1r- J-1,^_ -` rt ~� � '� ._�.�'•,�? lr t S e) ,y"$.r V r{:r.1'.t. t Vw`.h` ►_. •+ �r 4A / ,��...? �d,;,�•Jr'yr�-'`�•..};;L'', -+....."_•-_-•_•�...r'-..'w'�'�f^^••'',x+�,��i1r4�"IF� e4 I. -may - .�. •tip A.. .+.?� ,� 2305'2307 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE The Building Official may require submission 01'a written repurl ill'111V ur t{ vestigation which shall include, but hecvl t t ut t h. Get�trtt tt• the f,•�tvw; •f information- t•F ' �: �• •`^? 1, A plot showing the location of all test bori:t s,:nd/ur excavatium. ... 2, Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. "'''. ?' !;4 u t=` I Elevation of the water table if encountered ..may',.•,-_. :.- �..r . � ,'ai.+r�vp► �; 4. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria incluclmt, If * �s - i`' • bearing capacity, provisions to minimize the rl'I'crls of csl,;tntitc !r�"�� J,•.y�' :_, soils,and the effects of adjacent loads, I 3. Expected total and differential settlement, ti• (d) Expansive Soils. When expansive soils are present, the Building or. • ficial may require that special provi ions be made in tire foundmiun design and construction to safe guard against damage due to Htis expcur• siveness. He may require a special investigation and report to provide this J t ; design and construction criteria. ^,, I (e) Adjacent Loads. Where footings are placed at varying elevations the effect of ael.acent loads shall be included in the foundation design. C. it (f1 Druhntge. Provisions shall be made for the control and drainage of surface water around buildings. Allowable Foundation and Lateral Pressures See. 2906. The allowable foundation and lateral pressures shall not cx- ;+Il� ' ceed the values set forth in Table No. 29-B unless data to suhstan:ime the I II use of higher values is submitted. Table No. 29•B may be usevl fur design _ of foundations on rock or none.xpansivc soil for Types It.One-hour, 11•\ •ta:: I; acrd V buildings which do not exceed three stories in height or for siruc. tures which have continuous fsolings having a load of less thin Mitt ; pounds per lineal foot and iso!atcd footings w ith load,;of less thn SO,000 af,4+ .,...,� •, ��,- � tt pounds. .�... P,t t Footings Sec. 2907. (a) General. Footings and foundations, unless otherwise specifically provided, shall be constructed of masonry or concrete and in i , •�� I. w •I. all cases extend below the frost line. Footings shall be constructed of,solid ,,!" « • t t masonry or concrete. Foundations supporting wood shall extend aIcacl 6 . a +?.. .", . 3• inches above tile t e adjacent finish grade. Footings shall have a minimum �~ depth below finished grade as indicated in Table No. 29•A unless antther .;•t ; -};`�^.:, depth is recommended by a foundation investigation. (b) Bearing Walls. Bearing walls shall be supported on masonry ' r trete foundations or piles or othtr aor, or co shall be of sufficient sire to support all loads Where a rdt ignsis not%y I ch vided, the minimum fcundation requirements for stud hearing was shall be as set forth in all Table No. 29-A. ll _ .. Y..r F:X •war .,tt."' ,X CEPTIO\3: 1. .4 one-story wood or Merril frame huifding not used Rir human occupancy and not over 400 square feet in tAwr arca may be con" strurted with walls supported on it wood foundation plate%�hen approved by the Building Official. �. 468 tdt:..�•at"'.'1.t4 ,: �,• j >9 •_!hi .,.�`.il.'.gra""• ir' r _ ,y� '.; ',i "'�,f' 4 ':_>. .T. x.ff 4h .a<+�` fe3► ' S k •� .t��I� R +j N (�' t7 �er`L�} ..Z,4-ft.;�{�7 �%l.n• '�,�i� r :+ � �i�` .�f/`• '� :•,1'�` �+,`l "T`'•a�i�7' tTT++rr+tc- `tt .' '' y! �l afJ3�• ryr�}• ',� • 0ii 1 ! .y Y��.. ��.�1 t r't c� -r �" r'�t +'}�j• w. ' ;►. •'•'It. r•c, �r•>K�. ` }�i'Y�� r,,' � a!*r' f�.�-c�,•�;z-•.j�.5.r•'��-;,; ''M/' ••.••!F•i±t 'F�^�'��5�4• �I�t}I�w� F•�'r> •t„•.'!r•r...,.r►;.n ow! f► W. •rr.1,�: ' s� ''.l L..� ` Jy•„� .. '••{"'� � ,_..,�F, '`ti7�•`i.*�•'•'-%S•w,,N ,y.� r. ri.`.;...:yfid t.,, .r.. � r '�1 a. ,w1. . �• ,t�J:'`XR ✓ + i7 [ �lt,�� ; :..,il '•�_ Ittrf P yam+ 513 .t4• 'r, *�•. r•.-. , ' ice, ti,. ._ (. .•ria .KL 1"�'�+ ''t�ti+� � �'•q w_F''^. 1 y. b T' �•L,,_., t(ti�' y •t�jt � t,4 - a►�.ytF.. o^',i7 "'. t�•S}.��.F y;3 ��-,�1'ak�y' r rl +L�� sT , Nb�`:•A J_'_r. r � .. +'t +�� K ''K ti `r alt �`"!•l:%�'r•. f•e•>�'' .� N•�}t �•'Y �• �'' 1� �`{nA,''k•y- �a"Y c •lt��kyr y�,: �5" ,t�r� y�� , `,y,'`� 1. '�!••7� ' `• '!f' r'~TC'��} s•�4r'L + Y � t i.J cv_ K:�.+y`�ti 4 '?R}Ysai4�•+i!,ti3' t' ^F1 �.i•�„ �� ` •t.. y�, '"Y[.O P^ .sr �•y!!r n n.,^•�'"•'' * y{T 1 "�""+•}. �y�, '"_ •r��. `4 i c • 't ��j=��•ryji ; ati.>L'`i l.,1 • �t •�f+► y�i "Ta '4+I[�=5:. ;�•?!�1 'S t+-t. -""�j,-•;`��"�`x.•:>�t,•�;}��'`•.M..;lf,,�,•�]�' rv.4��t'it�:�'Y''�`��-„.�4+•'tZ�.::L�`'%' •-�hAPO71'i��'��r�1--. ' .'� + .Fa••i.'�!'�� ;4e.r-�+, aY .yrRRt'- t h e, '�.;�� g34•.`a. Y' - T} ._Y�~� �irs.� ��tY,��'+` ,� ,tni"_'`,?•a Sptrr7}',w•► �.t,2K .• •� <��}' � �'y - `^^ �. '�-„�•�.a -�Y !{``� ” '•ut^.._ � c t• w�.i.�,.' /;tri' 7 �:� L.ta� `'''E�sr- 'cs�Nd •'"`Y�ptiL'.��-�. 301 1976 EDITION •� Chapter 3 author-' . PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS ', .... -� ith Ant .. .�..4 Application for Permits erson, firm, or corporation shall = ' urs , rove, remove, convert, tri ► 'tt• . . tld pro- Sec. 301. (a) Permits Req'+ired. °� move, imp N enlarge, alter, rep or cause the sante to be tn�icate erect. construe'+, FDtov�! a se irate building P=rm{t for each such , . . of dcmrlish any builJing or structure in the city, pi ;UrLit+rl a done, without first obtaining P Official. !`y the or structure from the Building ! a �-`r building permit the apPlieaut shall first file an ap is 1lcant. i_.r cation•To obtain a p for that purpose. Every }' t -sl (b) APPIi furnished .';.o. plication therefor in writing on a form �•t, ', ,g`. •�rra #, by thu omit for which ,:* ,:' ^• .oval by •i such apPli�talion shall: the p• 1. Identify and describe the work to be courted by of �lte It" , , a. ::....,. 2•., ly r.Ille 4 application is made: y 2. Ucxribc the land on which the prop[i5erl work is to be dont,ri and street ru n etl hu Wing +!lnrizotl! > i black, tracts, and It fy and definitely locate the p ress, Or ill o,,!(l cr;puvn .. tif hat wi11 readily I• 'a;++ .. ,..: c to l:a a' or work: occupancy for which the proposed work is utr er c ). Indicate the use or Occup '• " : of o!'.1r ..�t; late tded; -.u.:.._;•';� latts and specifications a.. rcquireJ in ,, °' .tr ? the plin a. !tc accompanied by P ,•. .ze wIlh 1 ,ubsrction(c)of this Scclion; t;�i'�q„ .. , tihu mu). be s, State the valuation o f'n trice or`his,a t ltorited agent, • v the p I :'_'«..',,�..•-a4 ;i h. Be signed t, uireJ by the ` rcquirrd to submit evidence to indicate such maY be req l + ::.: •` i 1 trtattk . , + T Cii%,: such other information as reasonably in out !, i'tg per" t t• 'j>{�'� " •iew firs! Building Official. licit{on lbr a ,il 1 a pt.aay Ic; 1'luns Intl tipecificat{ans. \\'ith each app i 1 -� �,-- •►�--+-�— the Build Official for cnfurcentrnt [,f arty f • 01.81Ivituire'- C. Writ, unJ , hen require) by ions and.pccilication,>hall hesub* ,1 ..;, ._. the act- hrt,tisinnc of this Code.I' set.of P laws and specificatinn. to be e., C! plan!+ Official Wray require P v the Stine'It ntitted�i Itc Building an cng neer or architect hrensed b.' ilfeallatti prepared and designed by t fit ac, as such. v the Hailding UII'iciul plant Ind �t muted td t Zz ' It nece!• •".,- 1•:XCF P I It)�:when t�uh Wined lip Ihr t[,IluwlnF: t ..:' ;:a""" specification•nof Type eed nal he V convenlianu r acwLrly l ,[uud,u,�l eon,tructf"O f ,: s 1. (hte,tuty building• ptopt{ala' ,, \'cunvcutitutal NooJ,tuJ t �✓ `� ;, r =, . iy tCletrst Y c,ilhtut:ueanutrrcceding6ltlt,quar, 1'Cel. ` ed tttate• . (irnt+p M. 1)i,i,ion I nccup;utcic,[�f lyl ' F'+ - t~ dinsthat c,ai•nn.u,n. : 1. tim.1ll•sari un uttpntt;ntt aurk. 1 11.ve i p•;; puller ttr cloth un[i.hall he[,I ,ttf' �4. f s t m of such (cU Inh,tn,;,li„n un 1'lunx and �pecificut{nns. Flan, •tad • if{:ui[,n, A t•f the dr:ncn 1[„culc upon sub,tanli:tl [fit of the w[uk I'+"p11QJ .hall lx tont" at! �.,� licicnt cla,ity to Indicate the nalurt tut)t: ptovisions ul Ih+, ([,de anti ;til 11 contain 11c�an�la��t•! prtlinanco that it tes�ntics tan) rrt latiun,. fist I'it•l .beet ul'tuclt b.c+ Bern re- 29 �. t r fi -r_� ' ;tom+ ;�♦ s, ss'..- 4 J i '! �."� r�-• 'x �'C1i•=a.� .'� a�•a p�J'S.�y H.,��:i�••It�alfr t�,��wY ,�•, :at',[-}t' "ivr`•, 4ti� (,•�'," T+fit .1• ♦t ��'E 7 '.yam' .1t ` •. ,7- tr`' L�.0 .y,. '.'y,.?�,�,F S r'- ,'1''^7t�, ••'L•.r tiS y'�'"��'1 Fi +:f' G�'�u` .'tr"�J� [ • �� SMS A s ) t �C'�.1�•�.��-r-4 wn7�Jr;.� � :c�' :�►'��•[Se`f„� �i"�•�'. A)�ri'�'•�'�a�'?'ot��''f”" 9'rrr�'1'�"'•* h.:. "k.. .!� •r• �"` L��,�� ,yam' r u�, �. �,.,M,�,,' a:' �1• a.' f► ti �' �'"'r`` P. �+� ,r.rc ,f.,i • K c ,a ,. �,�,;;3•a, F.'�'-F. _ �, •,` .'�;•_ ' ��' `�Rt�"s t�!' '�'.rr�- �•�:�`,�I,�,s,a:`�`y'!t flu•, �{t.[•�, ,-� •�''�a ,pdot'�i STAFF REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIEty BOARD October .10, 1978 - 5 : 30 P.M . Tigard City Hall d 1?420 S .W. Main Street 0 ., Tigard , Oreuon Docket: SDR. 10-78 (War.ehous Request: For site dos ' and architectural review of a proposed 9 , 340 sq u.- foot warehouse. Location: 7385 S .W. Bonita Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 4000) . Applicant: National Safety Company 1. Basic Facts : 1. The site is zone M-3 "Light Industrial" zone. 2 . The site is a .wedged shaped parcel ; .85 acres) which is bordered by Bonita Road to the north, South Pacific Highway Railroad tracks to the east , Chicago Burlinaton Railroad track to the west and Ball Creek to the south. 3 . The site has a drainage flow to the south (approximately 2% overall grade) into Ball Creek . 4 . The vegetation of concern is located on the banks of Ball Creek and is comprised mainly of moderately sized deciduous trees. 5. The southern portion of the lot is located within the 100 year flood plain. II . City Council Action: 1 . Minor Land Partition MLP 5-78 - On September. 13, 1978 the. Tigard City Council upheld the appeal of the Bonita Road warehouse project with the following conditions: 1. . That the approach or access to Bonita be filled to an adequate hei.ght. '? e (2 . That Bonita be widened and improved at applicant's expense to provide adequate width and an apprcpr. iate access apror. That an access permit be obtained from Washington County and the Public Utility Commissi.onor for an adequate method of access and egress. 4 . That P.U.C. permission be obtained for an_y adjustment to the crossing-guardrails to provide appropriate access . 5. That the parcel be submitted to the Site Design Review Board for approvalof the site layout before any buil.ding Permits are issued . STAFF REPORT TIGA?D DESIGN REVIEW SOARD Oci.ober 10 , 1978 - 5 : 30 P.M. SDR 4?-78 Page 2 6 . That provision be made that additional right-of-way be dedicated for the necessary footage along the width of the property to bring Bonita Road to collector street standards for future widening . III . Staff Findings: The required parking is as follows : 1 parking space per 1000 sq. ft. (gross floor area) 9,840 sq. ft. (gross floor area of proposed warehouse) 9, 840 sq. ft./(1000 sq. ft./1 parkinq space) = 9 . 84 (10 required parking s[.aces) The applicant is proposing to build a 9 ,840 square foot prefabrica`_ed metal warehouse on a wedge shaped ( . 85 acre) site. The site has an awkward access/egress drive centrally located between the Southern Pacific tracks to the east and the Chicago-Burlington Northern tracks to the west. The railroad tracks are approximately 90 feet apart at the proposed site's entrance. The plans indica'--e a narrow access drive ( 12 ' -13 ' ) to the proposed warehouse. The Tigard Municipal Code (18 . 64 .030) establishes the minimum requirements for access/egress for a commercial site at 30 feet with a hard surface pavement over 80% of the required access width. This equates to a paved 24 foot access drive with 3 foot shoulders. Approximately 65 feet from the site entrance the lot is 27 feet wide and cannot physically accommodate the required 3 foot shoulders . This deficiency should not create a problem as long as the remaining access drives meets the specified code requirements. When the required access width is incorporated into the plans , parking spaces 7 & 8 will be directly affected and need to be repositioned. By placino parking spaces 7 , 8 ,9 & 10 perpendicular to the western property line additional maneuvering areas for the trucks utilizinq the down ramp can be gained . This new parking placement also creates a triangular landscape area directly to the north of the new location which will reduce the blanket effect of the asphalt on the site. The plans indicate a second loading docket in the southeast portion Of the proposed warehouse. The feasibility of trucks backing up (approximately 100 feet) into this docket by maneuvering around a parked car (space 3) is highly questionably. Thecefore, to lessen the congestion parking space 3 is to be eliminated. The applicant is proposing a limited landscape plan which must be modified tc incorporate the required access drive. Due to the nature of the site, the placement of the proposed warehouse and the required i i STAFF REPORT TU3ARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD October 10 , 1978 - 5 : 30 P.M. SDR 49-78 Pa -e 3 widening of the -access drive the remaining lana cape areas are small. Therefore, unless the remaining landscape areas utilize brighter planting materials the site will basically become an asphalt strip with a metal building on one end. The use of rhododendrons , azaleas and pieris would add color, create a pleasant work site and reduce the impact of the asphalt str.4_p. IV. Staff Actions: Staff recommends approval subject to Tigard City Council conditions and the foliowi.ng Design Review conditions : ty / zA r 1 . The access/egress drive shall be a minimum of 30 feet (.24 foot paved surface with thrse foot gravel shoulders) . 2 . Parking spaces 7, 8 , 9 & 1.0 shall be relocated perpendicular to the western property line as indicated on the plans. 3. Parking space three ( 3) shall be eliminated to reduce traffic congestion near the rear loading docket. 4 . The remaining landscape area shaLl incorporate brighter plantings to reduce the impact of the asphalt drive (rhododendrons, azaleas , pieris) . 5. A revised sit,? plan, landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for verification and approval of the .i.ncorporated c'-langes . 93 AF'F REPORT TIGARD DESIGN REVIE ,, BOARD October 10 , 1978 - 5 : 30 P .M. Ticiard City Hall 12420 S .W. main Street Tijard , Oregon Dr,Cket: SUR 49-78 Roiu�st : For site design and arch iter.tura1 review of a proposed 9 , 840 square foot warehouse. Location : 7380 S .W. Bonita Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 4000) . Applicant : National S fety Company T Basic Facts : 1 . The site is zone M-3 "Light. Industrial" zone. 2 . The site is a wedged shaped parcel • . 85 acres) which is bordered by Bonita Road to the north, South Pacific Highway Railroad tracks to the east. , Chicago Burlington Railroad track to the west and Ball Creek to the south . 3. The site has a drainage flow to the south (approximately 2 overall grade) into Ball. Creek . 4 . The vegetation oi: concern is located on the banks of Ball Creek and is comprised mainly of moderately sized deciduous trees . 5. The Southern portion of the lot is located within the 100 year flood plain. Tl . City Council action : 1 . Minor Land Partition MLP 5-78 - On September 13, 1978 the Tigard City Council upheld the appeal of the Boni '-a Road warehouse project with the following conditions : I . That the approach or access to Bonita be filled to an adequate height. 2 . That Bonita be widened and improved at applicant', expense to provide adequate width and an appropriate access apron. 3 . That an access permit be obtainied from Washington County and the Public Utility Commissioner for an adequate method of access and egress. 4 . That P. U.C. permission be obtained for any adjustment to the crossing-guardrails to provide appropriate access . 5 . That the parcel be submitted to the Site Design Review Board for approval of the site layout before any building permits are issued . STAFF REPORT TIGARD DFSIgN REVIEW BOARD October 10 , 1978 - 5 : 30 P.M. SDR 49-78 Pay e 2 6. That provision be made that additional right-of-way be dedicated for the necessary footage along the width of the property to bring Bonita Road to collector street standards for future widening. ] Ii . staff Findings: The required parking is as follows: 1 parking space per 1000 sq. ft. (gross floor area) 9 , 810 sq. ft . (gross floor area of proposed warehouse) 9 , 840 sq. ft./(1000 sq. ft./l parking space) = 9 . 84 (10 required parking spaces) The applicant is proposing to build a 9,840 square foot prefabricated metal warehouse on a wedge shaped ( . 85 acre) site. The site has an awkward access/egress drive centrally located between the Southern Pacific tracks to the east and the Chicago-Burlington Northern tracks to `_he west. The railroad tracks are approximately 90 feet apart at the proposed site' s entrance. The plans indicate a narrow access drive (121 -13 ' ) to the proposed warehouse. The Tigard Municipal Code (18 . 64.030) establishes the minimum requirements for access/egress for a commercial site at 30 feet with a hard surface pavement over 80% of the required access width. This equates to a paved 24 foot access drive with 3 foot shoulders. Approximately 65 feet from the site entrance the lot is 27 feet wide and cannot physically accommodate the required 3 foot shoulders. This deficiency should not create a problem as long as the remaining access drive meets the specified code requirements. When the required access width is incorporated into the plans , parking spaces 7 & 8 wi_11 be d3.rectly affected and need to be repositioned. By placing parking spaces 7 ,8 ,9 & 10 perpendicular to the western property line additional maneuvering areas for the trucks utilizing the down ramp can be gained . This new parking placement also creates a triangular landscape area directly to the north of the new location which will reduce the blanket effect of thc asphalt on the site. The dans indicate a second loading docket in the southeast portion of the proposed warehouse. The feasibility of trucks barking up (approximately 100 feet) into this docket by maneuvering around a parked car (space 3) is highly questionably. Therefore, ;o lessen the congestion parking space 3 is to be eliminated. The applicant is proposing a limited landscape plan which must be modified to incorporate the required access drive. hue to the nature of the site, the placement of the proposed warehouse and the 1-equired STUFF REPORT TIG:.RD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD October 10, 1978 - 5 : 3C P.M1. SDR 49-78 Pace 3 widening of the access drive the remaining landscape areas are small. Therefore, unless the remaining landscape areas utilize brighter planting materials the site will basically become an asphalt strip with a metal building on one encl . The use of rhododpndrorns, azaleas and pi.eris would add color, create a pleasant work site and reduce the impact of the asphalt strip. IV. Staff Actions : Staff recommends approval subject to Tigard City Council conditions and the following Design Review conditions : 1 . The access/egress drive shall be a minimum of 24 feet (20 foot paved surface with three foot gravel shoulders) . 2. . Parking spaces 7, 3 , 9 & 10 shall be relocated p2rpendicu.lar to the western property Line as indicated on the plans. 3. Parking space three (3) shall be eliminated to reduce traffic congestion near the rear loading docket. 4 . The remaining landscape area shall incorporate brighter plantings to .reduce the impact of the asphalt drive (rhododendrons, azaleas, p.ieris) . 5. A revised site plan, landscape and irrigation plan shall_ be submitted to the Planning Department for verification and approval of the incorporated changes . . 6. Applicant shall agto- to sign a non-remonstrance agreement for future IIID (Local Impro, cmLnt District ) on S.W. Bonita Road. v ,0 .nV PUBLIC UTIL17y CojiIIIIIISSIONLER OF OREGOI, .?0fiEpr W STRAUS LABC7; &, INDUS7RIES BULDING, SALEM OREGON 97310 PHONE (503) 378-61 91 September 21, 1976 1VJ45H CO JX106004'r PFfzm(r P 8048 John R. Skourtes Rt. 1, Box 575H Beaverton, OR 97005 Thank you for the opportunity to review your revised plans for the driveway access to your property and proposed ware- house between the grade crossings of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and the Oregon Electric Railway Company, at Bonita Road, Tigard. Each of these grade crossings are equipped with flashing lights and automatic ,,.gates. The PUC Staff has no objection to the constri.iction of the revised proposed driveway -ovidp,(-*]_a "No Left 5:uriLsign is inptalled at the driveway' s inters-ectinn Road. Tag--s-ion should -f"aQ6-Yaad api�lyl tg vehicl T`eaviur -w-gre AM I i ty. The "No Left Turn" tiign will insure '1'iat vehicles will always have an automatic gate aria in their driving lane. Without the "No Left Turn" sign, it is possible that a driver could turn "short" and drive on to the railroad tracks when the automatic gate arms are down. The sign will. aid the prudent driver . it is our understanding that the "No Left Turn" si4n be installed before any vehicular tT-affic mak new d ivewav— T-his- will inglude vehicles durin"Lg_.Q..n- TET--=tion phase of zhe project. This letter reconfirms our IeLter of March 2, 1978 , addressed to you on the same subject. Should conditions or larob_lems arise inthef"urej .., V P -H t7 i I-Ity Commissioner has the riqllt to innorp the sa ty of the mo :o aL-29-."ut ;-tomraiirp,�,d-hi�hway jrade crossIL19. This would include the proposed driveway. L/,.-, Transportation Sp6cialist Rail Rate and Service Division Im: 3305C CITY OF TIGARD P O Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main, Tigard, Oregon 97223 September 1.3, 1978 National Safety Company, Inc. Route 1, Box 575H Beaverton, Oregon 97005 ATTN: M,-. Join Skourtes Re: Appeal - MLP 5-78 Bonita Road Warehouse Project Dear Mr. Skourtes: The Tigard City Council, at their regular meeting of September 11, 1978, voted to uphold the appeal of the above mentioned matter with the following conditions: I. That the approach or access to Bonita be filled to an adequate height P '_. '=hat Bonita be widened and improved at applica` 's expense to prove. e adequate width and an appropriate access apron �du.!t.t0� 3. Thar an access permit be obtained from Washington County and the Public Util.i.ty Commis3ioner for an adequate method of access and egress. That. P.U.C. permission be obtained for any adjustmtint to the crossing-guardrails ti provide appropriate access. :i. Thil. the parcel be aubmitted to the Site Design Review Board for approval of th:- site layout before any building permits are issued. G. That provision be made that additional right-of-way be dedicated for the ne,.essary footage along the wiidth of tl:e property to bring Bonita Road to collector street standards for futu, widening. The full $100.00 which was deposited with the City for costs incurred during the appeal process has been spent in the following manner: Transcription Of Testimony - $86.00 and Public Notice Advertising - $14.00. If you nave any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or the Planning Department. Sincerely, 1 green Wilson 1w Recorder pro-tem CC: E.C. Edwards, Supt. BurliuNton Northern Railroad C.T. Babers, Supt. Southern Pacific Railroad Jorome Morris, Washington County Public Works Dept. Ro-er Campbell, Rail Rate S Service Division, Public Utility Commission FILd Anderson, Attorney Juan Hagman, City Engineer v" Ed Walden, City Building Official 11 c.ti 1 ,d u.,k Page 1 of 2 rage 1 of 2 9-13-78 John Skourtes NOTE: The following must he received by the City of Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this letter. . Failure to return Lhis acknowledgn,uc may result in action by the CiLy or Tigard . I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of Lhe Tigard City Council. . I have received and re.-.1d this letter and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/or condi' ions attached. Signatur- Date TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 8841 S. W. COMMERCIAL 9T. TIGARD, DREOON 97223 PHONE (5n3) 639-1554 August 9, 1978 i John R. Skourtes, President National Safety Company Route 1, Box 575H Re: T.L. 4000 , Map 2S 1 12A; Beaverton, Oregon 97005 7350 S. W. Bonita Road Dear Mr. Skourtes: After you departed from the meeting last night, the Board of Commissioners again discussed your situation and agreed upon a course of action to serve your property on the subject tax lot. As indicated in my letter of July 26 , 1978 there are no existing permanent distribution mains adjacent to your property to which you can connect. The existing 6-inch main to which you would like to connect, located between 72nd Avenue and the easterly right-of-way of the Southern Pacific Railroad, does not extend across any part of your property. Further, although Tigard temporarily uses this 6-inch main, it is owned by Metzger Water District and, at any time, could revert to their control. The only exist- ing distribution main to which you could connect is the 12-inch main located at the intersection of S. W. 74th and Bonita Road. In staying consistent with established procedures as defined in the rules and regulations of the district, it is believed fair and reasonable that you pay the cost to extend a 6-inch main (the minimum size) across the entire frontage of your property on Bonita Road. Further, that you bear the cost to extend a main to connect to the exist- ing 12-inch main located at 74th and Bonita Road, including a crossing of one set of railroad tracks. (See points "x" and "y" on the attached map) . Such installation would pro- vide you with a supply of water for the proposed warehouse. Costs to install this 6-inch main are estimated as follows: i h John R. Skourtes ' August 9, 1978 115 feet of 6" D.I. pipe @ $10/,ft. . . . . . . . $1,150 33 feet of 12" steel casing bored and installed under RR tracks, including casing @ $60/ft. . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 1980 Boring pit excavation, shoring, etc. . . . . 540 Total: $3 ,67n The requirements for a fire hydrant and fire sprinkler system would be as prescribed by the City of Tigard and/or Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. The above, costs do not include any of these items. The above notwithstanding and because of the diffi- culties in providing water service in this location, including the extreme depth of main between the tracks on Bonita Road, the Board of Commissioners will require that the main be installed, at an equivalent cost to you, southerly along S. W. 74th Avenue. Thus, a 12-inch main (8-inch chargeable to you) would be constructed along 74th Avenue at your identically same coat to install the 6-inch main on Bonita Road. An 8-inch main can be installed for $15 per lineal 400t. Therefore, with your capital invest- ment of $3,670 and the water district's contribution of $1,225 (difference in cost between 8-inch and 12-inch main) , 245 lineal feet of 12-inch pipeline will be installed along 74th Avenue. Your 1-inch meter connection ($800) will be on 74th Avenue at any point, at your convenience, laterally from this new main installation. Another valid reason for not actually installing the 6-inch main on Bonita Road is the fact that when and if the existing 6-inch main located between 72nd and the railroad tracks is returned to Metzger Water District, the proposed :Hain between the railroad tracks would become a dead-end line, an undesirable feature in providing good, dependable water service:. ' Installation of the water main will commence shortly after receipt. of. $3,670. -2- John R. Skourtes August 9, 1.978 Please advise if additional information is desired. Very truly yours, TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Robert #. Iaonter Admi.ni strator cc: Board of Commissioners Tigard Water District Mr. Fred Anderson Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District City of Tigard -3- 4n? \ AAAAr P'!'dor:' 402-Al % 23-�� P,) le"I'A MA 502 301 501 500 ,,:N TA#PNOA0 WIN. 4 7C`I g'r9go 1 \ t '1_ --------- ,ii., Id 51Z__�- NA 1�u in P BON11 A P S 10-946 Ind. —,4—,7. -3nvgr 1901 RSR 2000 �A^ l2P 1844c k 4AC oo ,�j 1900 .97'At "Ol-Al 800-AI �rvl-j 4 P 4 I'd .—Ioo.Ls V6_ 9 o c f SAI 4' 40 4 o-,(),o, Al IF 7 280? 1100 Jo 14, �Ai 4",54 ?Of) sm ccpI 45 Ac WuO A. JO'RtP4,r,.LG"lj uj 4", 09 > 21 ID 2710 t Ir 4 S'r 21(1( 34' VU ORA, IC Vu 112 If,) 1700 o JOAc ?300 ANIN 0 PIPA, 4 I 1 11 C!, 1.400P iC F�r-if,' Z400 0' 11 L 0 'RA, R 10;00 17 I I 94A, r ea AI 123ooe 1100 A rJ ARM11 To 3 A R mWAT E R DISTRICT TICIA RD, LIP EGON 9722_1 PHONE (Sna) 639-1554 July 26, 1978 John R. Skourtes, President National. Safety Company Route 1, Box 575H Pr,: T.L. 4000, Map 2S 1 12A; Beaverton, Oregon 97005 7350 S . W. Bonita Road Dear Mr. Skourtes: Your remittance cif $R00 for a 1" motor installation tc, ,,er.vu a proposed ,-arel►ousc on tlic suh.ject proporty cannot be accepted and is returned herewith. You have requested that you be allowed to connect a service lige to an existing main in front of General Chain Bar Company without incurring the liability of extenuinq a pipeline. TMs is certainly feasible, but I would not be a party to, nor would I approve, such a "jury-rigged" system. Such helter-skelter installation of waiter services degrades the water system, and invariably, results in an unjustifiable expense planed upon the other patrons of the district. As I have attempted to explain to both you and your attorney, Mr. Fred Anderson, all property owners are charged with the responsibility of paying the cost of a water main installation across their property. Thi only exception to this provision is when a main has been in- stalled for a period of ten years. (ORS 264. 320'1 . Historically, main extensions have been paid for by the benefited property owner(s) and the water district does not possess a special fund to accomodate new patrons. Present customers, who have previously made their contri- bution, do not bear the additional expense to extend mains for other property owners. The belief that one can connect to the water system for the price of a meter is erroneous. The meter charge is a relatively small portion of the total investment. John R. Skourtes July 26, 1978 The existing 16" and 6" ductile iron mains located within a 36" steel casing undc_r tri-- railroad tracks on S. W. Bonita Road adjacent tc, your property were installed and paid for by the patrons of the water district in 1973. 'rhose mains are temporary and will eventually be replaced with one 24" (high pressure) transmission main within the same 36" steel casing in accordance with the 1971 master water plan for the district. There is no existing permanent distribution main adjacent to your property to which you can connect. You will have to bear the cosL to extend either a parallel main (with casing under the railroad tracks) along S. W. Bonita Road or a main along S. W. 74th Avenin. Further, we would require that a fire hydrant be installed for adequate fire protection in accordance with OnS 264 .330. Costs for these main installations are estimaLcd as follows: S. W. Bonita Road: 200 feet of 0" D. I . pipe C $10/ft. . , . . . . $2 ,000 200 feet of 12" steel. casing bored and installed under RR tracks $32/ft.. . . . . . 6,400 1 fire hydrant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 1,000 Total: $90400 S. W. 74th Avenue: 65Q feet of 8" D.I. pipe @ $15/tt. . . . . . . $9,750 As I have indicated, we would prefer that the main be installed on 74th Avenue because it would be easier tc serve your property from that side. The mal.n on Bonita Road (under the railroad tracks) would be about 12 feet deep. (See attached map) . -2- a •a s � e John R. Skourtes July 26, 1978 Tt has been suggested that, perhaps, I have been discriminatory toward you in requiring that a main be extended to serve your property. I can assure you that this is not the case. Our files are open for public inspection and will reveal that hundreds of home owners and developers have paid thousands of dollars to acquire water service and fire protection . Por example, the owner of the new warehouse heincT constructed on S. W. ITunziker Avenue will. be required to extend a 12" main wiLh a fire hydrant at a cost estimated at $7,000. Also, it is noted that in 1964, Mr. Fred Anderson, your attorney, paid his pro-rata share Lo extend a main across the front of his property, including a fisc hydrant installation, on S. W. Bull Mountain Road. You are welcome to appeal my interpretation of the rules and regulations of the water district to the Board Of Commissioners who meet the second Tuesday of each month at 7: 30 p.m. Very truly yours, TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Robert R. Santee Administrator cc: Board of Commissioners Tigard Water District i Mr. Fred Anderson Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District City of Tigard -3- 1• � r, \ 402 i oN N,• e.B6 A c 402-AI lur \ z 1 \ V• 1.f R� 1115 - \ •+ \ 501 N 602 500 ;anAr _� 240 59Ac \ Z 3miTA 0400 91.Mn(L \ el Se ISO, \ r 1 /.04 Ac N G 9 vl 1314 ..,Jae"89 rr 48.6•.. .! �l' ty r _ S W BOWL A to9u r. 3g7.�• f a/til 1` \ _..950 P.O."1r +�4u 'ZOO—� 1 y H00 I5 �I "+' ` 1901 1 1,400 800-AIIt , _j 1 ..Iw, ` I'301 Al �I N L � � , SEE M '1 P 424W I \ Z 2S 1 128 1N89 52 1 1M900 \ Z $,?.90Ao 40 / its09°94'w 1000 � _ ,23._74 a0oo i.esA1. - 1902 � 6 4. in 1100 M' 499.94 1200 .. 1 )4,fi ,I N 31) 2101 � 3: 1800 � 3.53Ao • ZI .o W r2BAc N \ P,'Ac, on .t 2\/ bl Q � 21 N 4 aas T6' _ _ N f ;• 4 8 2101. N S3 A. 19 i ~ to e♦ s4' 9t♦Ar (C 1 Nu 11216) II 1700 \ _ 1300 ��`1 D 1..30Ae. ?`300 47 d °v -Cf '�r'' 24f►0 23 78 _e1020' (O \ �� 0 "NA r 31N t0' •1 1400 A e1A1. ✓— ...r 1600 N \ j!;no 17 +� 1.01 Ac N\ l se Ac, `-,M1CRlIN DLC. 4! r CS 110012 v,\ \1 23 ag 1504 I le Ac I S � t une 30, 1978 To: Mr. Ed Walden, building offici-il From% John Skourtea, National Safety Co. F Subject: Sewer fee, tex lot 4000, 10,200 s0. ft. whse R-fer.ence to our letter to you dated a,Iry 24, 1978 concerning payment of certain fees for the development of this property. No reply was received. We ere enclosing our check for $2,100.00 covering the sewer fee for this parcel as enumerated in the May 24, 1978 letter.. An agreement was made with the Unified Sewer Agency on May 18, 1978 wherein we will be taping into their new 21" interceptor line. A 4. " connection to this line will. occur within the next ten days es construction progresses at this site by the U.S.A%g. contractor.. The city will be notified when the connection occurs. It is our understanding that payment of the sewer fee does not gunrentee en issuance of a building permit at than time. Sin cerHly, rnc1 . , am MIkK UL 12/ �04/ a /r To: `Ar. Ed Welden� building offie.-iol Fro-s John Skourtes, National Safety Co. Su'Djert : Sewer fee, tax lot 4001), 100200 sq. ft. whAe Rl.f,-rence to ou^ letter to you dated " 240 1978 concerning payment of cart-i.n .Fees for the development of this property. No reply w'-js r"C;eived. We ere enclosing our check for. $2,100.00 covering the sewer fee for this parcel as enummrsted in thQ May V, TWO letter. An agreement was made with thn Uitif.ied Sewer Agency on May 18, 1978 wherein we will be toping into their new 21" interceptor line. A 4" connection to this line will occur within the nx',t ten days as construction progresses at this: Bite by th^ U.S.Als. contractor. The city will be notifi"_d ,th-n the connection occurs. It is our urderstending that payment of the sewer fee does not guarantee an iesuence of a building permit nt this time. Sincerely, V ------------ ITATIO,,A.L sAFe , COMpAr,-Y Route 1, Box 51511 Beaverton, Ore,?on 9(OC;; May 24, 1978 TU: Mr. FA Walden, building official q-r1 ra, ti.n,_. 'ty Manager when Bite in question. was reviewed by you last December 1978. SUBJE)CT: Issue building permit for 10,200 sq. .rt warehuuRe, tax lot 4000 We hereby ask you to review the building plans for National Safety Co. as submitted to the city on March .1, 197c.: fila issue a building perr.:lt for construction c,f 10,200 sq. ft. warehouse on tnx lit 4(',00. Tia* is of the essence. We would expect this to occur upoi, payment of the following fees: $�2,P00•00 Sewer 5u0.00 Facility charge =100.50 Plan chi ,c & building fee Plans have already b,�en approved by •Ise .hate Uep►rtment of Commerce. If you will carefully review our letter to Mr. Boleti, planning director dated May 15, 197P, tol;ether with the taped meeting of May 9, 1978, where you were present together with Messrs. -ikourtes and Harker, you will note that there are no areas of substa:,,--! whereir, plaiming can prevent applicant from building structure on this; site. All conclusionery pointrj i:) plaa;:i.ng str-aff report signed by Mr. Bolen, dated April 27, 197e have been proved wrong or favorably resolved. Therefore, we have been advised by our attorney that the City of Tigards position, specifically Mr. Bolen's on minor land petitioning is legally untenable. We will agree to go thru landscape review in conjunction with you issuing a building permit. Further delay in this mnniie-r r'erves -'o useful purpose to all parties concereed. Continued :a;:lerarceA will. only cause further economic hrar;lship to applicant and negative feelings fb^ sl; parties. If further clariftr.gtio, is required on any point, please call our counsel direct, Mr. Frei Anda dor., l,h•)ne No. 539-1121. :sincerely, NATIONAL jAFh1jy CO. INC. cc. Mayr);' r i UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING— 150 N. FIRST AVENUE �\ HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 `--�' 1503) 640-8621 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS h1ILLFH M GUR I S.Cha-rman Joel Wesselmal 83General Manager 1 L L BLOOM VIFGINiA DAGG Room RICHARD C HEISLER RAY M,LLER May 1(' , 1c,78 Mr. John R. Skourtes Route 1 , Dox 515 H Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Dear Mr. Skourtes: UDJECT: SOUfHWOOD PARI' 4 AND 14A EASEMENTS This is in reply to your letter, of May 10, 1918. The engineering construction cost estimates to provide a connection stub on Parcel i 14A is from $800 to $1 ,000. The Agency will provide this connection stub at no cost to your company provided the subject easements plus a temporary easement to install the connection stub are submitted at the presen'. Agency offer. The conditions in your letter related to paving an , landscaping are acceptable. Connection to the stub will be suhject to thf: rates and ordinances of the Unified Sewerage Agency. If you have An,, f,_lrther questions , please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Robert C. Ce 6'z Division Ehaineer RCC:vr � M r , i � I � 1, I�_RE P. S. �TAM jES & C©. ()f o,,eg0n Insurance Brokrrs and Qns dt �t �Since1858 ONE SOUTHWEST COLUMBIA • %RTLAND 97201 • (503) 248-6400 px. jim scimager Supervisor luAlio Protection Dept. Inatwance Services Office of Oreq+m 421 S. W. 6th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Dear Jimt I em writing cm behalf of our client who In contemplating construction of an all stool huiWing in the Tualatin MD. The building when com- pleted will be occupied by two light hazard %moamiga with each tenant occuping 5,000 94uare feet. T11is building will be located on the south side of S. W. Bonita load botween the Southern 1Pnoifie and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. Thew aro standard fire hydranta within 500` of the buildinr; but thaaa hydrants ars located on the opposits side of the railroad tracks from the building (see skstch below) . What will be the effoct, if any, on the fire invurancj rating and protection grading of this building caused by the ple:•em not of tjw3e hydrants 'p Thank you for your assistance in this matter. W ry truly pocvre, 0Ir'k_ Dick Shook Tec=h. Services Dept. psa c lgh r J J 2 LOGAIAGA,, 40 r �° i�ldc:t'k rt ty n � e t� MIORF THAN 80 OFF ICES Tu SERVE YOU THROUGHOUT THF W I-U Gia ROAM HIRR 11RI PROiME mm. Ll P. 0 BOX 127 • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 PHCNE 638-6861 • RUSSELL MASHAURN, CHIEF April 26, 1978 National Safety Company Rt- 1 , Box 575A Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Re: John Skourtes Building, Bonita Rd. at the railroad tracks Bear Mr. Skourtes: As prr our verbal discussion, a fire hydrant will be required on your site of the proposed building at Bonita Road between the railroad tracks. Tualatin Fire D.strict' s Fire Prevention Code as adopted reads in part under Section 3-5.5 - "Water supply and Fire Hydrants. The Fire Marshal may require that all premises where buildings or portions of buildings, other that) one- and two- family dwellings, are con,;tructf_d and located in such a manner that access to public fire hyurants is minirfral or of a distance such that the Fire Marshal can demonstrate that fire fighting op?ra- tions would be impaired, be provided with a water supply system ir)stalled it accordance with the provisions of Standard fur Out- side Protection, NFPA No. 24. " In enforcing this section of the Fire Code, the Fire District uses the gu4deline, the Tigard City Orlinance, which requires hydrants to be withii^ 250 ft. of all parts of the building. Additionally, the distance from the building to these hydrants to be an ac.ce3sible manner. A fire hydrant that is on the other side of a railroad track is not if an accessible location. Having tho railroad tracks between the hydrant and the building would produce unnecessary delay in utilizing the water to he used in case of fire. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Yours truly, n ' _eph A. Greulich Fire Marshal JAG:dm cc: Fred A. Anderson, Attorney 7-3.7 Beaverton Ordinances 7-3.7 (e) Fire chief. The chief of the fire department of the city of Beaverton or any other member of the fire depart- ment duly appointed by him to administer the provisiois of this section. (f) Judgment. The judgment of the fire chief based upon sound fire protection and engineering principes, which judgment shall be conclusive. (g) Land. Any lot, parcel, areage or building site, or any other land or portion thereof embraced within a common plan of development, whether improved or unimproved. (2) Review of plans. (a) Every application for a building permit and its accumpanying plans shall be reviewed by the fire chief and a determination made whether any building or structure on the land to be developed is or will by virtue of said de- velopment require the installation of on-site fire protection facilities. If.,upon such review, it is determined either that the fire prctectior facilities mentioned in Section 13. 301 (c) are not required or that they are adequately pro- vided for in the plans, the fire chief shall endorse his approval thereon. If adequate provision for such facilities is not made, the fire chief shall either disapprove said plans and indicate to the applicant in writing wherein they are deficient (in which case any revised plans shall be rf,- submi.tted to the fire chief fcr review) or approve said plans subject to conditions. (b) Applications for individual building pe~7nits relat- ing to a sub3ivision or conditional use permit need not be submitted for review and approval by the fire chief, 3.f the fire chief has reviewed and approved the subdivision plat or th conditional use plot plan; provided, however, the installation of on-site fire protection facilities is car- ried o-at in substantial accord with the approved subdivision Plat or the conditional use permit. (c) This section shall nct apply to "1" and ",I" occu- pan�:ies as classified by the city building code, if such occupancies are not subject to subdivision plat or conditional. use plot plan review and approval by the city. (3) Facilities required. (a) Fire hydrants shall be located so that no part of any commercial building becomes more than 250 feet from a I ire hydrant and no single family residential building be- comes more than 300 feet from a fire hydrant, as measured along an accessible route. Fire hydrants shall be located at least 40 feet from the building or buildings to be protected. For purposes of this subsect.ion, a "commercial building" means any building used for other than "I" or occupancy as defined in the city building code. 4/3/78 i■ria � ��crrsrftitest ve r urnmew4e-rLgNf REVIEW SECTION NCi> nCE OF PLANS RtVILW PAGE 1 - '1 pt yiM ,16-STAT! QWCE BUIEUING, POULAND 97201 •w ITHIS If NOT A BUILDING PEAMIT� _National_Safety Co_� 76Lh & Bonk! Road Tigard 78-320 Nn l!l Brildnq AcL1rr _Wa-1iir(gton Occupant B'2Const._ V-N 809000.00 9$ 80 y -- - ---. Sound Value _- - __. Plan fee ,. a_.. Thomas g n p � Dee Received _-_.-x-1"78 A' •- -•--E�'.�'.1t..V!_ ._...- New 61d Addition ,�leera+inn � _ Q-78 Ti�,�_-_.`_._ __ __ Addrea _._-___--NQS --- _•-- ogee Reviewed -_ _.One-- Area10,20Q/-1V-5-- Attic _ NIS Fire Wella -NIP- Fire Escapes _NIS Eci$ __2 �'_• ft. • Mo.,Fit, Basement Ht. stops Tv.SV son ,;tar•. ..._.�.1`I�rd__. _ Vert. Shafts /5 _ Sprinklers X., �/-�._ Man. Alarm Nls. SP. Cl.ted Closed No Yat Area Coveted Int. Si E Hr Dot, _� �5 /_-_� Floor COriC Ceiling �.N� _ Rpof�Larks. Sit. Memlls Ifetal/wood Glea No. Type Area Covd. **tt� Hor, rm. encl. �_ 11LS_ Type fluo __ ►1L S___. Type Hog. Syttern Ear Int. The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes arid regulations of Oregon ad-nin- istpeed by this office. Items No. —�llz 17s 36 c�+tehed on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially ncted provisions must be incorporate;! inta the project to meet current fire protection regulations. Approval of submitted plans i%..not an approval of om ssions or, r±i:r;ilh's by this office or of nincomplience with any applicable regulations of local government. » REMARKS: _.-This review is based on the project being located in Fire Zone #2. .A) -RQof_-covering shall- be fire_retar_danto _ I B)_Cu4rdrai.l_shalt be reg_u red for_both ramp Guardrails shall be not less than 4 inches, _in__height with nc_opening exceeding 9 inches. _—_ __. -�_ -- - - t\ C) geyices t:►a�enerate a Spark or giow�sh�ll not be-installed or used within T8'inc�ies D _The..uses_handlir end starage_of Flarrmtable Liquids in this build rig ai irt� Exam inNd by Copies to _ ApplicantsFities Deputy#SkTi?OL.rnersBldg.Dento9Fire UeptasElec`a t '+.: .. PACS: 2 of DEPARtMENT of GOMMiRCE-/!ANS REVIEW lECTIJN NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW I 0'. 176, STATE CFFI:E BUILMN0,PORTLA•.D 9'41 - w 7 ITHIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT. t•`' National SafEt Gc 74th & Bonita Road Ti and 9. -3itq -- --.- - .^-- _�-___- .-� __----.-n- -- -� — No. -78-. 20 B.Id-,q Add-% _ ac_ordarce_with _the-,provision-of t—he_ -UniJQm BuUd.i,nt; �ctdea �ti3nd�rdSIc�..1Qz1._._.. �A11lazinZ_s��b_Jeco_t�_i{uman_JmVL,1ck-AhAU_be_L.emperesL_glassoo.- ----___— F.L Plans are _ac�.ptahle a ubmitted- �ubjgc�_tQ,bh �,�etn�-aQted-�b-nye--an�thF -apprnvaL.__ of the authorities having_jurisdiction. - ........... --.--- �i ® I � flI. fllln HUI I & RHINE KIRIN -0 f ,� • E t�It-N`! • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF � F. 0. sOx.2sS a TUALATIM, OREGOtf 17052 FHON AN ORDINANCE ADOPT"NG THE FIRE PREVENTION CODA AS R.ECOHMENDED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, ALSO ADOPTING VOLUMES 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12„ 13,14,15, and 16 of the 1976 NATIONAL FIRE CODES AS PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION INTERRATIONAL OF BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS GOVERNING CONDITIONS HAT.ARDOUS TO LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE OR EXPLOSION. REPEALING PRE-EXISTING FIRE CODE, PFESCRING AN EFFECTIVI DATE \ AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. 7 4��n'JE'O U0 «7 \ - BE IT ENACTED by the Tue.latin Rural Fire protection District, Washington and Clackamas Counttes, Oregon: SECTION 1._ Pursuant to applicable provisions of Oregon Revised States, this ordinance is fog the purpose of providing the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District with rules and regulations to improve public safety by promoting the control of fire hsraTda; regulating the installation, use and maintenance of equipment; regulating the uoe of structures, premises, and open areas; providing for the abatcruent of fire hacarda; ectablis' A ng the responsibilities and procedures for code enforcement; and setting forth the standards for compliance and achievement I of these objectives. This shall be know-n as Fire Code of Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. ` THE ;SIRE PREVENTION CODE OF TFiE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, NFPA NO.1, ' 1 sad its incorporated standards and codes as published in the NATIONAL FIRE CODES of the National Fire Protection Association, Volume 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, 14,1:10 and 16 and being particularly the 1976 edition thereof, tof,ether with appendices designated by Section 17 of this o dinance, are hereby a417pted and incorporat:,td herein to the aame legal force and effect ,as if set out at length herein. One or m^r.e copies of the 1975 edition of the FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, N.F.P.A. No. 1, and adopted standards and codes of the NATIONAL FIRE CODES as hereby adopted shall be maintained on file in the offices of the Fire Marshal and the provisions thereof shall be effective wi.thin� tt��bo�nda>~,i,.tL.Qt� t��Ttia�atin Bur 1 Fire Protection.,Dl�tri�ct.r i . �.w.wA/..rr- _ -- �._ w.W ��.A:�' s�'TMLfi!'•.'ST•"'4T'?ls ._....��.�_Y .SF�i:$XXfT --. � -_� _^ M 1 w C-4 H C u 0— r.0 0. e000 � a L .0 cz • r•' u O 'U.� u A O b'IC ro a-• > .0 V w n T7 0` Q u itl 0, p-O 4 0 0 CL bt u CL O r W d V ° p Ci J '> L u il t7 O a. > w G acd ^J�C yi u pq O u FesF.. ° oG-C c� `"w :.;•�,. c`. L CO `�W ° v b > ro E a 1 -0 .Ly"nal G.,Ji rt+ U 0 �" V ° - c a° 3 c: 9 0 9 y u 3•el C'^w ^' amu. v C OD° a�. �. C t. O Gy •�• p, > -- 1.r A yy G C a J m M 0 a o O c\a. •ly Y.[ 10- ,a ,a�C�.i .0 b,.� v� .+•WwM�r,w+w.r+w.►�+w'+YF4rw�a•�.�+w�n/'ww..e-nr.Ma� w��w w+ __—_��MqF.w/F.M+oN►•..w.•w.w.^h.�FMIIM'Mwwr-A�....�,+�..1vN'?I-AI...wr '..'T: _r: � A y'•It.�.. 1 1 —V vLO u 0-ria r U T>] �mQocp� P>> O" N ro r a .y, Q'SO. A u e r O w A p.. G.•C n U V U > `I [ >.� ro O O N p >, l u,A1O C Cl r w ro "S. T7 i. u .O O 7 u >..4 Ll p E^' > H C iJ �^ L.O. U .L' — u F .L1... /y'n T1 °j u«. O �1<, U ro Z] U >A � °'n G M CO 7 u u v� UM V >Q I� u 0 CI 1 p 4u G -0 o a~Ci O O .°li bO E G O °L. V ,O O b v 4 q N 1 M ro ti h q u G Go C a C 0-0 u °ru a C W > ? 0 �• > C a O ,�, b p p m q A L u > u� °u b ~O V G•^� '27.r� rl„ rola.. _ x>-'•u � G o� �� 6x ° c'�•° XI ° ro oto 0 b a ° �^u ° > ; 0 M w ro t: q O ~ bn y u U > w u u •0 0. w 3 G F cA Id CL. u d }� ° u a� u o , ❑ a G " u a / G p bo o - ym' Ta ^ c O C.n y''- cocoL M 4 V ro 'b .u`"' p r q .c u .O g C C U c t7 'J. p a• � Cc4� "7 a E'" � }�! � > ��d� O �•,yx 7 T x O Mv D , '. . > O O Y 1 O .0 N U GO ^S. w n U V " d L•4,= t3 " roco � ° C4 u .: 2t7 0u r9 c3 •• '; C �jGon b l� w c� w.� � o.ro c n . IV m Am CITY OF TIGARD, OR]aon ORDINANCE No. 70- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING, RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING ',MLAPPLICA- / BILITY TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE FIRE PREVENTION CODE ADOPTED BY THE VOnRS OF THE TUALATIN RURAL FIRE: PROTECTION DISTRICT, INCLUDING 'THE CITY OF TIGARD, BY REF-LRENDUM OF May 26, 19Fs ; PRESCRIBING STANDARDS FOR ON-SITE FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF TIGARD; PROVIDING APPROVAL OF FIRE FACILITIES BY TILE TUALATIN RURAL I FIRE PRO'T'ECTION DISTRICT AS CONDIT:CON PRECEDENT TO ISSUANCE OF BUILD- ING PERMITS; PROHIBITING OBSTRUCTION OF ACCESS TO RISK AREAS: RE- QUIRING FIRE INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FACILITIES PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY; ESTA13LISHING RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENA14CE OF FACILITIES; PROHIBITING OBSTRUCTION OF FIRE HYDRANTS AND SIMILAR FIRE CONNECTIONS; PRESCRIBING EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS K r'OLLOWS: Section 1: The Council of the City- of Tigard does hereby lowk., rhr�t',d adopP the Fire Preventi p Code.,-of the Tu�,�,at Rural Fire Protection District as adoptW* try' the legal voters, of the District , including voters of the City Of Tigard,ndt a referendum election on the 26th day of May, 1966, sn' _ _��ti or_reCdd�.ficatf�rn '!"e=�iti�dtiie"• thereof. - 1 i �ra 3 r.. % 1. � r