13643 SW ASHBURY LANE 1
W
w
r,
G
ti
r
I w
I �
13643 SW ASHBURY LANE
`44 i��4 ey w� },: 1 r�qy�44:r4 �'.+ � �''•';r:a "�Y ► + 1 fY��Grl
` iI �P�«~ � � �'�rt+ 9�•'AA"jig � It M1" gyp` lP't54C "r �7 +lglir Iy, �tL:i,
R+ !j"�I t SI•
00
a 0� I co 4, F
14
tj
cu �20
cn
En
w
�1 3 0a
o fn cd b
,+',• V �,.� G u �o +y� d gay I � � 1�
+ M •r4 I or 4H }r 4J
co 1-4
11
4
Aff
mw
a,���k"��t 9 '` -- ,� - -- -�-ver,. •� - — � ;' �
��..J _ - _�-".. �Jae y ' "•." ,;A..:. r�
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
VARIANCE V 10-86
APPLICATION: Request by Qual.ico Inc. for a variance to allow an 18 foot front
yard w back for the garage where 20 flet is required on property zoned R-25
(Residential 25 units/acre) and located at 13643 SW Asnbury Lane (Wash. Co.
Tax Map ISI 33CD, Tax Lot 3100) .
DECISION: Notice is hereby given that. the Planniig Director for the City of
Tigard has APPROVED the above described application subject to certain conditions.
The Findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as
rioted below.
A. FINDING OF FACT
1 . Background
The property is one of the lots created by Cotswald Subdivision which
was approved by the City in 1985 (S 3-85).
2. Vicinity Information
The surrounding land iF, also zoned R-25 and contains a combination of
developed and vacant lots.
3. Site Information and Proposal Description
The lot contains a home that is under construction. When the footings
were inspected by the contractor, it appeared that the house had a 20
foot setback in the front yard. When a survey check was done later,
it was discovered that the garage only has a 18 foot setback.
a . Agency and NPO Comments
The Engineering Division and Building Inspection Office have no
objection to the request .
B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The following criteria in the Community Development Code apply to variance
requests:
I . The proposed variance will not be mat-rially detrimental to the purposes
of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other
properties in the same zoning district or vicinity;
2 . There are special circumstanceN that exist which are peculiar to
the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which
the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other
properties in the same zoning district ;
NOTICE OF DECISION - V10-86 - PAGE I
3. The use proposed will he the same as permitted under this Code and
City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent t'iat is
reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land;
4. Existing physical and natural systema, sucl. ar but not limited to
traffic, drainage, dranatic land forms or parks will not be adversely
affected any more than would occur if the development were loacted
as specified in the Code; and
5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the
minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship.
Tile primary purpose of the setback standards for thr it-25 zone is to allow
for adequate spacing, air, light, and privacy for resi.dential structures.
The variance will not have an appreciable effect upon the existing or
proposed residences in the area. The 18 foot distance between the garage
and front property line will provide adequate spac: for parking vehicles
on the driveway without blocking the public sidewalk.
The lot is relatively small and if all setback requirements from the
property lines and the house were enforced, the applicant would have to
move the building or adjust the property line. The City has no objection
to the 19 foot setback.
D. DECISION
The Planning Director approves V 10-86.
D. PROCEDURE
1 . Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall
and mailed to:
XX The ,applicant 6 owners
XX_ Owners of record within the required distance
XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
XX Affected governmental agencies
2. Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHAIA BE FINAL. ON I�a 19, 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL
IS FILED.
3. Appeal :
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with
Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development
Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY
RECORDER within '0 days after notice is given and sent .
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4 :30 P.M. May 19, 1986
NOTICE OF DECISION - V 10-86 - PACE 2
i
______�_._aa., •,q,.;��:,;:' ?"''"c`r.^�«,rr-...... r,+s-.•��*"T-.......,+.•--•—T..-..n-•___._.'^'_-.__---� III
i I
! INSPECTION NO-I ICE
City of Tigard Building Department
P.U. Box 23297
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Phone-
639-4175
Type of Inspection C=-, - -------
Date Requested_- 41 f O - rE' Time A.M. P.M.
Address _ 1 6�-� =-ar/ . , ��=�� ilC / Permit
Owner ___ / Lot #_
BuilderThe following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected:
t —
f
Presented to Approved
Inspector El Disapproved
Date -- `� / C;, ._ 471
CALL FOR REINSPECTION
❑ YES /0 NO
INSPECTION NOTICE
City of Tigard Building Department
P O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Phone: 639-4175
Type of Inspection --< � —
Date Requested_ — `�Gz---- Time__� A.M. P.M.
Address _.
Lot
z' �'S `� '1� "� Permit
--
Owner _ -- — —
# _—
Builder -__—_--
The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected:
i
t �� JinF
�r
�' a ►Z �!�" 11.7 '� .��' —
i
� � I
r -
Presented to Approved
Inspector __ I �'�— —— L-� Disapproved
Date
CALL FOR REINSPECTION I
C l YES 1-1 NO
5888
CITY OF TIGARD 639.4171 DATE ,Irci,
BUILDING PERMIT a
. TAX MAP _f j�o'�3 l_OT N0. �—.--SUBDIVISIUNIf{�.SLISLd.-
1*,. IY Ashbury I+rine ..raciQwe l
OWNER JOB ADDRESS --- -'--- — -
BUILDER -jV ri d.-i�' �uttt l►l bTATE REG.NO.l�� EXP.DAYS -_t__-L_ -----
BUILDER'S PHONE -
ARCHITECT - - - PHONE --OTHER .-- ---- - -- --
-, i !
STRUCTURE I NEW ❑ REMODEL Ll ADDITION C I REPAIR V MOVE ! OTHER DEMOLITION
IACCESSORY GARAGE 01HER r1 FENCE_—
RESIDENCE I l COMM f ' EDUCATION IND f RELIGIOUS f
_PLAN CHECK BY HEAT_ ,i,4
OCCUPANCY _LAND USE ZONE BLDG.TYPE �" FIRE ZONE _.-
Con,struct sillhle iau,ily dwellitir; w,attaCIltd ,arage, all per a, yroved plans.
;K��ject to &-aarL j WedlRW00 t j6U.uo F. Lerun heights ;;15U.(,u sewer ellary'u:s.
SEWER PERMIT M A.
OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD 1,11 HEIGHT ]-i, NO.STORIES 1
AREA L2tt4A NU.BFDROOMS 3 VALUE _
BUILDING DEPARTMENT SETBACKS FRONT_ REAR LEFT SIDE ;,y RIGHT SIDEr_��
Permit ZJZ.i/U -_THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING
REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE
Plan Check 1✓9.01 WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE
"WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE
PI.Ck.Fire RESTRICTIVE CCVFNANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS
TAX PERMITS.SEPARATE PERMITS REOVIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEATING.
State Tax a:ioc 1.51/.4U (✓. ../l ,ly-�t....,,,. ,..,
493.4f1 SDC- 51 to.U0 NT
-- ----- - --
Total APPLICAON AQ N1
luu,uU PDctl i k5u.ulr —__--
Prepd. --- —_-.___--- -- —---- —
- Receipt No. ,+ .1 '� ADDRESN PHONE
Bal.Due
-_ Issued By- Apprrered
I
f
6
• I
I
DATE INSP, TYPE INSPECTION RE ARKS PLUMING DATE
n _ Contractor
Permit No. r c�t3 -
'L Rough in
Fixture
Final
HEATING / r�
t Contractor
6
PermitNo,
Gas orOil
Rough-in
_ Final -�—
SEWER -
Final
DRIVEWAY
— Final
Storm Drainage
(Rain Drain)Final
Sidewalk
Curb 6 Street sinal
Approach
BLDG.DEPT,FINAL TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Final
CERTFICATE OCCUPANCY _.
Landscaping
Zoning Final