Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Packet - 12/13/2016
IN " City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 13, 2016 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated;it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:•30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-718-2419, (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://live.tigard-or.gov CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 13,2016 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM •STUDY SESSION A. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS •EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss legal counsel consultation under ORS 192.660(2) (h).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please) A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Tigard High School Student Envoy C. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce D. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion.Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 7:40 p.m. estimated time A. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDER CONTRACT AWARD FOR PROSECUTORIAL ATTORNEY B. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDER CONTRACT AWARD FOR BANKING SERVICES C. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDER CONTRACT AWARD FOR VIRTUAL DESKTOP INFRASTRUCTURE (VDI) D. RECEIVE AND FILE: 1. Council Calendar 2. Council Tentative Agenda for Future Meeting Topics E. RECEIVE AND FILE - CANVASS OF VOTES FOR NOVEMBER 8, 2016 ELECTION •Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Sebarate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. APPOINTMENT OF BUDGET COMMITTEE MEMBERS 7:45 p.m. estimated time 5. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS 7:50 p.m. estimated time 6. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR TIGARD TRIANGLE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN 7:55 p.m. estimated time 7. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT 8:40 p.m. estimated time 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 10. ADJOURNMENT 9:10 p.m. estimated time City of Tigard Tigard City Council Meeting Agenda TIGARD December 13, 2016 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION A. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Per ORS 192.660(2)(h): For consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be filed. B. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS Administrative Items: 1. Assistant City Manager Newton has confirmed TVCTV can cover the 1st Tuesday meetings of the month at no additional charge. However, they will not be live streamed due to other live meetings happening at the same time. TVCTV will begin filming 1"Tuesday council meetings beginning on January 3 at 6:30 p.m. Council Meeting Calendar December 6 Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 13* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 15 Thursday Council Goal Setting—4-7 p.m.,TVF&R Headquarters, 11945 SW 7th Ave,Tigard 20* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 27* Tuesday Council Buaincas Meeting 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall Cancelled January 3 Tuesday Council Inauguration Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 10* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 17* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 24* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 31 Tuesday Council Outreach Event—6:00 p.m.—8:00 p.m.,Max's Fanon Creek Pub, 12562 SW Main St.,Tigard February 7 Tuesday Council Business meeting- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 14* Tuesday Council Business Meeting- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 21* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 28* Tuesday Council Business Meeting- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk(*). SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR /cl/)3)/( i ievn 213 (DATE OF MEETING) Tigard High School Update : December 13, 2016 • Recent o Football barely lost in the semifinals to CC o Our Give Back Drive is happening right now until Friday for the Caring Closet and St. Vincent De Paul Food Bank • Taking monetary, non perishable food, and gently used clothing donations o Theatre put on "Much Ado About Nothing" and it was a hit! o Choir had a performance last night, and another one this Thursday at 7pm ■ In the auditorium for free! o Yesterday we had an assembly recognizing our Sparrow this year o Tigerettes Placed first in 3 of the 4 categories they competed in at Fall Championships on Saturday • Coming Up o "Tigard's Got Talent" Winter talent show assembly is Friday o Many make up & regular season sporting events this week • Basketball on Wednesday and Friday (Girls are home both days) • Wrestling on Thursday at THS o FBLA business club is working on a giving tree encouraging students to help those in need in our community a Winter Break! AGENDA ITEM NO. 2D - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: December 13, 2016 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses ofpersons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: —% 4 M 1...‹)1\16.- Also, .--'QN6.Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address • ( 4 ) J 5 )244 A-- City (C Pte-(? State Zip a-222' Phone No. Name: MCP Z 19/ow/t/ if Also,please spell your name asi t sounds, it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address /3 2 53 ci,44 b Xe VZ City `' ,'Q State Ofi Zip 7 Z Phone No. (03— S L-9---/ 9 `7 Name: rt-e%ft�:PtL.LtJ---(j Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: erf Address C? / 12✓i o"s i 110.) City rV tra'rtn ( .>r State A- Zip 11-W Phone No. `7 ' D 9di C q CITIZEN COMMUNICATION I:\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\000 City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\citizen communication 161213.doc AIS-2932 3. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Contract Award - Prosecutorial Attorney Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - LCRB Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for Prosecutorial Attorney services to the Law Office of Larry J. Blake,Jr.? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the City's Prosecutorial Attorney service needs to the Law Office of Larry J. Blake,Jr. for an estimated $40,000 annually and a possible lifetime cost over five years of$200,000 and authorize the City Manager to take the necessary steps to execute the contract. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City issued a Request for Proposal for special legal services, including prosecutorial services, on September 23, 2016. Proposals for the services were due by October 18, 2016 and the city received one proposal, from the Law Office of Larry J. Blake,Jr. for prosecutorial services. Mr. Blake is the city's current prosecutor. Mr. Blake has been serving as the prosecutor for Municipal Court since 1994, the selection team felt his experience justified proceeding with the review process. The Selection Committee comprised of representatives from Court, Central Services, and City Management reviewed Mr. Blake's proposal and scored the response based on the following criteria: • Firm and Team Qualifications •Project Understanding and Approach •Cost Structure Based on the discussion the Committee unanimously endorsed recommending that the Local Contract Review Board award The Law Office of Larry J. Blake,Jr. the contract for prosecutorial services. The first year of the five-year contract Mr. Blake will bill the City at a rate of$150.00/hour and will total an estimated $40,000. The total over the possible five years is $200,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may reject this award recommendation and direct staff to resolicit for the service. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The Local Contract Review Board discussed this potential contract at their November 22, 2016 business meeting. Fiscal Impact Cost: $40,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: General Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: This service is budgeted in the Municipal Court's operating budget in the General Fund annually. The contract is estimated at $40,000 each year for a possible total of$200,000 over the possible life of the contract. Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-2933 3. B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Contract Award - Banking Services Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - LCRB Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for banking services to US Bank? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for banking services to US Bank utilizing permissive cooperative procurement, as authorized under ORS 279A.215, through a contract between the City of Salem and US Bank. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard currently has its primary banking services contract with US Bank. This contract provides a variety of services: •General checking •Merchant services •Lock box (automatic processing of check payments, primarily for utility billing) Every five years the city re-evaluates the contract. Our five years are up, and the city needs a new contract. The city has been pleased with the services from US Bank. The bank's staff responds quickly to questions from city staff. US Bank consistently receives high ratings from web services that rate banks for safety, such as Bankrate.com. Staff believes it to be in City's best interest to continue to contract with US Bank. Over the life of this contract, staff will explore future possibilities to maximize the City's banking service numbers to maximize the "buying power" for this service. This will include exploring the possibilities of joint solicitations with other municipalities through various organizations in the state. Staff is asking the Local Contract Review Board to allow the use of the City of Salem's Request for Proposal (RFP) and subsequent contract and approve new banking services agreement with US Bank. Staff is recommending the use of a permissive cooperative procurement, as authorized under ORS 279A.215 through the use of the existing Salem contract and solicitation. The permissive cooperative procurement method allows the city to save on both staff time and materials when compared to a traditional RFP. The City spends roughly $100,000 annually (with a $20,000 offsetting credit) on banking analysis fees and related services. The estimated total for these services is roughly $450,000 over the next five years. This money is allocated to the Financial Operations annual budget. In addition, the city pays roughly $300,000 annually in merchant transaction fees for credit and debit card payments. These are made either by phone, internet, or point of sale. Staff estimates that roughly $60,000 are via US Bank and the remainder via third party vendors. These fees continue to escalate due to multiple factors (e.g. higher use of credit/debit as a method of payment, increasing fees for service, and increase in activities in areas such as building permits) and staff is looking at negotiations for lower fees or other solutions. The total amount paid to US Bank under this agreement for the full five years could be as much as $750,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may reject the award recommendation and direct staff to solicit for the service. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The Local Contract Review Board discussed this potential contract at their November 22, 2016 business meeting. Fiscal Impact Cost: $150,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: Multiple Additional Fiscal Notes: The City anticipates a spend of an estimated $100,000 annually (with a $20,000 offsetting credit) on typical banking analysis fees and related services. The estimated total for these services is roughly $450,000 over the next five years. This money is allocated to the Financial Operations annual budget. In addition, the city pays roughly $300,000 annually in merchant transaction fees for credit and debit card payments. These are made either by phone, internet, or point of sale. Staff estimates that roughly $60,000 are via US Bank and the remainder via third party vendor. These fees continue to escalate and staff is looking at negotiations for lower fees or other solutions. The total amount paid to US Bank under this agreement is about $150,000 annually and roughly $750,000 for the full five years. Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-2934 3. C. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Contract Award - Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - LCRB Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for a Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) to Structured Communication. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for the Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) project to Structured Communication for an estimated $232,900 and authorize the City Manager to take the necessary steps to execute the contract. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY History The City of Tigard IT Department has been tasked with replacing 250+ computers that are 5 years old or older. A budget line item of$249,000 was added to the 2016-17 IT budget to accomplish this task. The history of Tigard IT has proven that the physical desktop replacement model is problematic with the current IT staffing and budget levels. The City of Tigard currently has nearly 500 desktops, laptops, and tablet (mobile) devices. Previous hardware and software practices has resulted in over 6109 types and versions of software spread across the previously mentioned devices. This hardware and software combination is managed by a 4.0 FTE staff of 1-Senior Network Administrator, 2- Network Administrators, and 1- Help Desk Technician. Additional support is provided by the IT Manager and Database Administrator as needed. The IT staff must manage, deploy, secure, repair, install, update, and inventory all of the software and hardware that is in use around the city. This has ultimately driven the IT environment to an unmanageable level with no standardization and aged / poorly performing hardware with low user satisfaction. Why VDI With the underlying goals of standardization, manageability,mobility,maintainability, and security the IT department is recommending a VDI program described below instead of recreating and intensifying the current desktop replacement model. With a VDI environment the computing horsepower lives in the datacenter and is delivered to the end user via the network to any device with a network connection. VDI turns the aging, poorly performing computer into a modern supercharged workstation without hardware replacement. This VDI project will allow IT to refresh all City of Tigard computers instead of limiting results to the 250 that were identified as aged. VDI is centrally managed in the datacenter allowing for faster and more flexible deployment and streamlined changes. Software is standardized and installed once in the datacenter and deployed instantly to users as license quantities allow and the end user request is approved. Software licensing can be on a full time, or as need basis depending on the need. Updates to operating systems and software are performed at the datacenter level and instantly available to all users simultaneously. VDI will standardize the operating systems, software packages, and versions in use across the city increasing consistency and standardization for the end user while increasing manageability to the IT staff. With VDI the full software and computing experience can be securely made available to any device with a network connection wired or wireless regardless of physical location. VDI will increase the mobility and efficiency of city employees and prepare the city for a distributed environment if ever needed. This can be beneficial in many ways, but specially in preparation for a civic center project, or major renovations to existing building where the possibility of entire departments needing to be relocated to alternate locations. The Plan IT staff has conducted an evaluation process and created proof of concept environments with the 2 major VDI vendors VMware and Citrix. Since proven and reliable competition in the VDI scope is limited to the two major vendors, under section 10.125 of the Tigard Public Contracting Rules which allows software to forgo the formal competitive process if little competition exists. With only 2 vendors in the field that meet the city's needs and requirements, staff contacted these firms directly and was able to evaluate them without the cost of a full RFP that would have resulted in no other viable options. After the analysis and testing of the two solutions staff is recommending the City move forward with the Citrix solution. As such, staff is recommending a contract be awarded to Structured Communication, the local Citrix provider, in the amount of$232,900. This total includes a $49,000 discount if the solution is purchased by the end of the calendar year. VDI and Disaster Resiliency Currently, the City has limited infrastructure for business continuity. A worst-case critical event, such as a fiber cut between the Niche and City Hall, would currently result in end users having no access to email, network files, printers, or internet until the fiber is repaired. They could only use the handful of files saved on their local computer but would have no way to send, share, or print them. In a Virtual Desktop environment, the outage would be very similar except the user wouldn't have local files to access. Where VDI does provide a potential benefit is with an event that renders a building such as the Permit Center uninhabitable, VDI would allow affected employees to remotely access all their files from any computer or tablet. The City currently keeps backup copies of critical servers in the Police Department's network room, so that we have some ability to restore limited services in case of a disaster. Unfortunately, there is no current location in the City that has the utilities, resources and space to allow for a complete replication of Niche Data Center services. In the future, we will need to dedicate resources to create a viable disaster recover location. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may reject the award recommendation and direct staff to solicit for the services and hardware. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The Local Contract Review Board discussed this potential contract at their November 22, 2016 business meeting. Fiscal Impact Cost: $232,900 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: Central Services Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: The contract is estimated at $232,900 including a $49,000 discount if the solution is purchased by the end of the calendar year. The Information Technology budget has $249,000 this year for replacement of 250 computers that would fund this project. Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-2939 3. D. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Receive and File: Council Calendar and Council Tentative Agenda Submitted By: Kelly Burgoyne, Central Services Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Consent - Receive and File Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Receive and file the Council Calendar and the Tentative Agenda for future council meetings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is requested; these are for information purposes. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are the Council Calendar and the Tentative agenda for future Council meetings. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A - Receive and File Items Attachments Council Calendar Tentative Agenda ■ MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Honorable Mayor&City Council FROM: Kelly Burgoyne,Deputy City Recorder RE: Three-Month Council/CCDA Meeting Calendar DATE: December 6,2016 December 6 Tuesday CCDA Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 13* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 15 Thursday City Council Goal Setting Meeting—4:00-7:00 p.m.,TVF&R Headquarters Boardroom, 11945 SW 7th Ave.,Tigard 20* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 27* Tue3day Council Bu3inc33 Mccting CANCELLED January 3 Tuesday CCDA Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 10* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 17* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 24* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 31 Tuesday City Council Outreach—6:30 p.m.-8:30 p.m.—Max's Fanno Creek Pub,12562 SW Main St.,Tigard February 7 Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 14* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 21* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 28* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk(*). is\adm\city council\council calendar\3-month calendar word format.doc Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session CI Special Meeting 0 Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting City Council Tentative Agenda 12/5/2016 11:12 AM - Updated Form Meeting Submitted Meeting Title Department 'Inbox or # Date By Type Finalized 2642 12/13/2016 Carol AAA December 13, 2016 Business Meeting Central 03/21/2016 Krager Services I 2689 12/13/2016 Carol ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Council Liaison Reports Central 04/15/2016 Krager Services 2902 12/13/2016 Carol ACCSTUDY 20 Minutes - Executive Session called under ORS City 11/09/2016 Krager 192.660 (2) (h) Management Total Time: 35 of 45 Minutes Scheduled I I 2932 12/13/2016 Joseph ACONSENT Consent Item - Contract Award - Prosecutorial Finance and 12/05/2016 Barrett Attorney Information Services 2933 12/13/2016 Joseph ACONSENT Consent Item - Contract Award - Banking Services Finance and 12/05/2016 Barrett Information Services 2934 12/13/2016 Joseph ACONSENT Consent Item - Contract Award - Virtual Desktop Finance and 12/05/2016 Barrett Infrastructure (VDI) Information Services 2936 12/13/2016 Carol Krager ACONSENT Consent Item - RECEIVE AND FILE - CANVASS OF Central Marty W, City VOTES FOR NOVEMBER 8, 2016 ELECTION Services Manager 2835 12/13/2016 Liz Lutz CCBSNS 1 5 Minutes - Appoint Budget Committee Members Finance and 11/23/2016 Information Services 2847 12/13/2016 Doreen CCBSNS 2 5 Minutes - Appoint Planning Commission Members Community 11/23/2016 Laughlin Development 2789 12/13/2016 Susan CCBSNS 3 45 Minutes - Public Hearing - Tigard Triangle Urban Community 12/05/2016 Shanks Renewal Plan Development 2860 12/13/2016 Sean Farrelly CCBSNS 4 30 Minutes - Public Hearing for City Center Urban Community 12/05/2016 Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Development 1 I Page is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 5, 2016.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session 0 Special Meeting Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting City Council Tentative Agenda 12/5/2016 11:12 AM - Updated Total Time: 85 of 100 Minutes Scheduled 12/15/2016 December 15, 2016 - City Council Goal Setting Meeting Location: TVF&R Headquarters Boardroom, 11945 SW 70th Ave, Tigard (4-7 pm) 2653 12/20/2016 Carol Krager AAA December 20, 2016 Workshop & Business - Combo Central 03/21/2016 Meeting - Councilor Goodhouse Absent Services 2900 12/20/2016 Marissa ACONSENT Consent Agenda - RECEIVE AND FILE: Public Works Public Works Rager B, PW Director Grass Annual Report 2848 12/20/2016 Joe Patton CCBSNS 1 5 Minutes - Appoint City Center Advisory Community Farrelly S, Redev Commission Members Development Project Manager 2846 12/20/2016 Joe Patton CCBSNS 2 5 Minutes - Appoint Tigard Transportation Advisory Community Brown B, Assoc Committee Members Development Transp Planner 2861 12/20/2016 Sean Farrelly CCBSNS 3 30 Minutes - Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan - Community Shanks S, Senior Adoption Hearing (if needed) Development Planner 2899 12/20/2016 Judy CCBSNS 4 10 Minutes - Consider an IGA Between the Cities of Public Works Rager B, PW Director Lawhead Tigard and Beaverton Covering Cooperative Maintenance for SW Barrows Road 2937 12/20/2016 Lloyd Purdy CCBSNS 5 10 Minutes - Hunziker Infrastructure Project: Right- Community Purdy L, Econ of-Way Resolution of Necessity Amendment Development Development Mgr 2862 12/20/2016 Hannah CWKSHOP 6 40 Minutes - Receive update on Tigard's Affordable Community Holloway H, Temp Holloway Housing Programs Development Planning Asst 2858 12/20/2016 Anna 'CWKSHOP 7 30 Minutes - Safe Routes to School Update Community Patton, J., Senior Dragovich Development Administrative Sp 2813 12/20/2016 Kelly CWKSHOP 8 30 Minutes - Discuss Non-Residential Tigard Finance and LaFrance T, Fin/Info Burgoyne Transportation SDC Information Svcs Director Services 2901 12/20/2016 Judy CWKSHOP 9 20 Minutes - Discuss Proposed IGA on Future Public Works Grass, M, Conf Exec Lawhead Governance Between Lake Oswego and Tigard Assistant Partnership 2 I Page is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 5, 2016.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session 0 Special Meeting 0 Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting City Council Tentative Agenda 12/5/2016 11:12 AM - Updated 2645 12/27/2016 Carol AAA December 27, 2016 Business Meeting - CANCELLED Central 03/21/2016 Krager Services I 2869 01/03/2017 Carol Krager AAA January 3, 2017 City Council Inaugurations - No CCDA Meeting 2871 01/10/2017 Carol Krager AAA January 10, 2017 Business Meeting 2921 01/10/2016 Carol Krager ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Council Liaison Reports Central 11/21/2016 Services 2903 01/10/2017 Carol Krager ACCSTUDY 30 Minutes - Executive Session called under ORS Central 11/09/2016 192.660 (2) (f) exempt public records Services 2928 01/10/2017 Kelly CCBSNS 1 20 Minutes - Second Quarter Supplemental Finance and Barrett 3, Sr Mgmt Burgoyne Information Analyst Services 2935 01/10/2017 Toby CCBSNS 2 15 Minutes - Public Hearing to Amend TMC 15.06.020 Finance and Krager C, City LaFrance Permitting the Franchise Agreements with Special Information Recorder Districts and County Service Districts Services 2555 01/10/2017 Lloyd Purdy CCBSNS 3 10 Minutes - Second Review: Development Community Purdy, L, Econ Agreement Hunziker Infrastructure (Hold for Development Development Mgr Scheduling) Total Time: 45 Minutes (0 Hours, 50 Minutes) 2872 01/17/2017 Carol Krager AAA January 17, 2017 Workshop Meeting Mayor Cook Absent 3 I Page is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 5, 2016.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session 0 Special Meeting 1■ Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting City Council Tentative Agenda 12/5/2016 11:12 AM - Updated 2868 01/17/2017 Tom McGuire CWKSHOP 1 30 Minutes - Receive Council Requested Training on Community Marty W, City Land Use and Quasi-Judicial Decisions Development Manager 2925 01/17/2017 Mike CWKSHOP 2 15 Minutes - Briefing on An Intergovernmental Public Works McCarthy Agreement with Metro and Tri-Met for Fund Exchange Between Fanno Creek Trail (RFFA) and Main Street Phase II Projects 2930 01/17/2017 Shauna CWKSHOP 3 45 Minutes - Civic Center Update Public Works McMillian K, Large Engineering Manager Total Time: 90 Minutes of 180 Minutes Scheduled 2873 01/24/2017 Carol Krager AAA January 24, 2017 Business Meeting 2922 01/24/2016 Carol Krager ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Council Liaison Reports Central 11/21/2016 Services 2882 01/24/2017 Lloyd Purdy ACCSTUDY 20 Minutes - Executive Session per ORS 192.510(6) Community Purdy L, Econ Property Negotiations - Hunziker ROW Development Development Mgr Total Time: 35 Minutes of 45 Minutes Scheduled 2884 01/24/2017 Sean Farrelly CCBSNS 1 10 Minutes - Review Ballot Measure Title for City Community Farrelly S, Redev ,Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Development Project Manager 2881 01/24/2017 Susan CCBSNS '2 25 Minutes - Review Ballot Measure Title for Tigard Community Shanks S, Senior Shanks Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Development Planner 2915 01/24/2017 Lloyd Purdy CCBSNS 3 10 Minutes - Tigard Street Heritage Trail: Community Purdy, L, Econ ConnectOregonVl IGA with ODOT Development Development Mgr 2828 01/24/2017 John CCBSNS 4 15 Minutes - Willamette Water Supply Project Intake Public Works Grass M, Conf Exec Goodrich Structure Allocation Assistant 2926 01/24/2017 Mike CCBSNS 5 5 Minutes - Consider Authorizing Signing an Public Works McCarthy M, St/Trans McCarthy Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro and TriMet Sr Proj Eng for Fund Exchange Between Fanno Creek Trail and Main Street Projects Total Time: 65 of 100 Minutes Scheduled 4 I Page is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 5, 2016.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session Special Meeting Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting City Council Tentative Agenda 12/5/2016 11:12 AM - Updated 01/31/2017 January 31, 2017 - City Council Outreach - Max's Fanno Creek Pub, 12562 SW Main St, Tigard (6-8 pm) 2875 02/07/2017 Carol Krager AAA February 7, 2017 Business Meeting f � 2889 02/07/2017 Sean Farrelly CCDA 1 40 Minutes - Joint Meeting with CCAC Community Farrelly S, Redev Development Project Manager 2888 02/07/2017 Sean Farrelly CCDA 2 20 Minutes - Discuss Downtown Redevelopment Community Farrelly S, Redev Development Project Manager 2880 02/07/2017 Susan CCBSNS 3 20 Minutes - Business Mtg - Refer Ballot Measure to Community Shanks S, Senior Shanks Voters for Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Development Planner 2885 '02/07/2017 Sean Farrelly CCBSNS 4 10 Minutes - Refer the Substantial Amendment to Community Farrelly S, Redev the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to the Voters Development Project Manager Total Time: 90 of 100 Minutes Scheduled 2874 02/14/2017 Carol Krager AAA February 14, 2017 Business Meeting 02/14/2016 Carol Krager ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Council Liaison Reports Central 11/21/2016 2923 Services 2906 02/14/2017 Carol Krager ACCSTUDY 30 Minutes - Metro Update from Councilor Dirksen Central Krager C, City Services Recorder 411.11! g ori 2904 02/14/2017 Carol Krager CCBSNS 20 Minutes - Informational Public Hearing - 74th Public Works Krager C, City Avenue Vacation Recorder Total Time: 20 of 100 Minutes Scheduled _ .-1 2908 02/21/2017 Carol Krager CCWKSHOP February 21, 2017 Workshop Meeting 2907 02/21/2017 Anna Mae CCWKSHOP 1 20 Minutes - 2017 Annual Court Report Central Gliebe, A, Court Gliebe Services Supervisor 5 I Page is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 5, 2016.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session giSpecial Meeting Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting City Council Tentative Agenda 12/5/2016 11:12 AM - Updated 2894 02/21/2017 Liz Lutz CCWKSHOP 2 30 Minutes - Moss Adams Auditor review and results Finance and Fitzpatrick C, Asst Fin Information Dir Services 2895 02/21/2017 Liz Lutz CCWKSHOP 3 30 Minutes - Second Quarter Budget Committee Finance and Lutz L, Conf Exec Meeting with City Council Information Asst Services 2917 02/21/2017 Cheryl CCWKSHOP 4 60 Minutes - Tigard Triangle Lean Code Update Community Caines C, Assoc Caines Development Planner i., Total Time: 140 Minutes of 180 Minutes Scheduled 2909 02/28/2017 Carol AAA February 28, 2017 Business Meeting Krager 02/28/2016 Carol ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Council Liaison Reports Central 11/21/2016 2924 Krager Services Total Time: 15 of 45 Minutes Scheduled 2905 02/28/2017 Carol CCBSNS 20 Minutes - PLACEHOLDER Informational Public Central Krager C, City Krager Hearing - 74th Avenue Vacation Services Recorder Total Time: 20 Minutes of 100 Minutes Scheduled 2910 03/07/2017 Carol AAA March 7, 2017 CCDA Meeting Krager 2911 03/14/2017 Carol AAA March 14, 2017 Business Meeting Krager 2912 03/21/2017 Carol AAA March 21, 2017 Workshop Meeting Krager 2918 03/21/2017 Cheryl CCWKSHOP 60 Minutes - Tigard Triangle Lean Code Update Community Caines C, Assoc Caines Development Planner Total Time: 60 Minutes (1 Hours, 0 Minutes) 6IPage is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 5, 2016.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session a Special Meeting 0 Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting City Council Tentative Agenda 12/5/2016 11:12 AM - Updated 2913 03/28/2017 Carol AAA March 28, 2017 Business Meeting Krager Council Confirmed Travel &Vacation Dates: Councilor Goodhouse: Dec. 20,Absent Mayor Cook: Jan. 17, Conference of Mayors 7IPage is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 5, 2016.docx AIS-2936 3. E. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: RECEIVE AND FILE - CANVASS OF VOTES FOR NOVEMBER 8, 2016 ELECTION Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Consent - Receive and File Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Receive and file the official election results for the November 8, 2016 City of Tigard election results for two city council positions and three measures: 34-255 City of Tigard Light Rail Extension, 34-256 Fuel Tax and 34-257 Marijuana Tax. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is requested. This is a receive and file summary for information purposes. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Recorder canvasses the votes as required by the Washington County Elections Division and a copy of filed with the City Council to officially "receive and file" the information. The Statement of Votes Cast attached shows: •Jason Snider with 35.50% and Tom Anderson with 31.09% of votes cast received the most votes and were elected to the office of city council. •Measure 34-155 Tigard Light Rail Extension was approved (50.30 % yes; 49.70% no). •Measure 34-256 Fuel Tax Increase failed (40.13% yes; 59,87% no). •Measure 34-257 Marijuana Tax was approved (74.08% yes; 25.92% no). Attached are the Abstract of Votes, Statement of Ballots Cast, Statement of Votes Cast and a Tigard precinct map. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Abstract of Votes Statement of Ballots Cast Statement of Votes Cast Tigard Precinct Map Aft WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON November 29, 2016 City Recorder City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 Enclosed you will find a copy of the Abstract of Votes for City of Tigard relating to the General Election held on November 8,2016. Sincerely, 0/4(,<A<Iae Mickie Kawai Elections Manager MK/tk Department of Assessment&Taxation,Elections Division 3700 SW Murrray Blvd.Suite 101 Beaverton OR 97005 Phone:503/846-5800 Fax:503/846-5810 Statement of Votes Cast by Contests Page:88 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:34:14 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702,Registered Voters:341315,Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total City of Tigard Council(Vote for 2) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Tristan Kira Tom Anderson Jason Snider Bret Lieuallen Write-in Write-in Over Under Cast Voters Votes Irvin Voted Votes Ballots Precinct400 3174 4043 3803 659 17.33% 1104 29.03% 1349 35.47% 650 17.09% 28 0.74% 13 0.34% 1 2543 Precinct 402 6781 8172 8582 1226 1429% 2804 32.67% 3001 34.97% 1433 16.70% 87 1.01% 31 0.36% 5 4970 Precinct 404 5134 8548 6455 1090 16.89% 1938 30.02% 2227 34.50% 1112 17.23% 70 1.08% 18 0.28% 2 3809 Precinct 405 7091 8481 8778 1380 15.72% 2728 31.05% 3208 36.55% 1384 15.77% 60 0.68% 20 0.23% 4 5396 Precinct 409 4084 5182 4939 803 16.26% 1547 31.32% 1774 35.92% 737 14.92% 58 1.17% 20 0.40% 3 3223 Precinct411 59 74 70 6 8.57% 26 37.14% 24 34.29% 14 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 48 Precinct427 26 34 36 8 22.22% 11 30.56% 12 33.33% 5 13.89% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 16 Total 26349 32534 32663 5172 15.83% 10158 31.09% 11595 35.50% 5335 16.33% 303 0.93% 102 0.31% 15 20005 _L E.i �.:; ��r..''',-;:,5:,'!..1--�j •' .; frt r Statement of Votes Cast by Contests Page:154 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:34:16 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702,Registered Voters:341315,Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total 34-255 City of Tigard Light Rail Extension(Vote for 1) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Yes No Over Under Cast Voters Votes Voted Votes Ballots Precinct 400 3174 4043 3017 1631 54.06% 1386 45.94% 1 156 Precinct 402 6781 8172 6533 3017 46.18% 3516 53.82% 1 247 Precinct 404 5134 6548 4937 2545 51.55% 2392 48.45% 0 197 Precinct 405 7091 8481 6767 3329 49.19% 3438 50.81% 0 324 Precinct 409 4084 5182 3881 2112 54.42% 1769 45.58% 1 202 Precinct 411 59 74 57 34 59.65% 23 40.35% 0 2 Precinct427 26 34 25 15 60.00% 10 40.00% 0 1 Total 26349 32534 25217 12683 50.30% 12534 49.70% 3 1129 „•}x'`'. . - t ::e01-01,?.:..), ,f r� , �L21 x:. Statement of Votes Cast by Contests Page: 155 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:34:16 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702,Registered Voters:341315,Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total 34-256 City of Tigard Fuel Tax(Vote for 1) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Yes No Over Under Cast Voters Votes Voted Votes Ballots Precinct400 3174 4043 3002 1213 40.41% 1789 59.59% 0 172 Precinct 402 6781 8172 6499 2479 38.14% 4020 61.86% 1 281 Precinct 404 5134 6548 4877 1979 40.58% 2898 59.42% 1 258 Precinct 405 7091 8481 6735 2830 42.02% 3905 5798% 0 356 Precinct 409 4084 5182 3860 1525 39.51% 2335 60.49% 0 224 Precinct 411 59 74 55 21 38.18% 34 61.82% 0 4 Precinct 427 26 34 26 8 30.77% 18 69.23% 0 0 Total 26349 32534 25054 10055 40.13% 14999 5987% 2 1293 viii'_ w ' .* 'tir(— ?CRs1. Statement of Votes Cast by Contests Page:156 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:34:16 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702,Registered Voters:341315,Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total 34-257 City of Tigard MJ Tax(Vote for 1) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Yes No Over Under Cast Voters Votes Voted Votes Ballots Precinct400 3174 4043 3042 2046 67.26% 996 32.74% 0 132 Precinct 402 6781 8172 6572 4934 75.08% 1638 24.92% 0 209 Precinct 404 5134 6548 4926 3486 70.36% 1460 2964% 0 208 Precinct405 7091 8481 6812 5306 77.89% 1506 22.11% 0 279 Precinct 409 4084 5182 3892 2939 75.51% 953 24.49% 0 192 Precinct 411 59 74 55 47 85.45% 8 14.55% 0 4 Precinct 427 26 34 26 24 92.31% 2 7.69% 0 0 Total 26349 32534 25325 18762 74.08% 6563 25.92% 0 1024 "-a-tis r: is • g�•� , •• v ,• • • ',kik,• v•. Statement of Ballots Cast Page: 1 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:16:08 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters:341315, Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Precinct Ballots Reg.Turnout Cast Voters Pct. Precinct 301 1579 1896 83.28% Precinct 302 1902 2561 74.27% Precinct 303 854 1083 78.86% Precinct 304 2570 3286 78.21% Precinct 305 814 1067 76.29% Precinct 306 619 777 79.67% Precinct 307 1531 1909 80.20% Precinct 308 141 168 83.93% Precinct 309 3006 3680 81.68% Precinct 310 1472 1772 83.07% Precinct 311 613 742 82.61% Precinct 312 701 839 83.55% Precinct 313 5 6 83.33% Precinct 314 300 335 89.55% Precinct 315 903 1029 87.76% Precinct 316 730 843 86.60% Precinct 317 906 1097 82.59% Precinct 318 2544 3192 79.70% Precinct 319 5911 7753 76.24% Precinct 320 2446 3195 76.56% Precinct 321 285 357 79.83% Precinct 322 231 281 82.21% Precinct 323 24 27 88.89% Precinct 324 445 544 81.80% Precinct 325 3 4 75.00% Precinct 326 1677 2036 82.37% Precinct 327 3277 4188 78.25% Precinct 328 1782 2178 81.82% Precinct 329 6721 8459 79.45% Precinct 330 1390 1677 82.89% Precinct 331 2186 2791 78.32% Precinct 332 2214 3193 69.34% Precinct 333 3192 4628 68.97% Precinct 334 139 158 87.97% Precinct 335 4171 4978 83.79% Precinct 336 2497 3229 77.33% Precinct 337 3513 4788 73.37% Precinct 338 4052 5620 72.10% Precinct 339 4573 6358 71.93% Prednd 340 5586 6900 80.96% Precinct 341 315 374 84.22% Precinct 342 57 66 86.36% Precinct 343 4007 5122 78.23% Precinct 344 3699 5034 73.48% Precinct 345 22 30 73.33% Precinct 346 267 318 83.96% Precinct 347 57 66 86.36% Precinct 348 23 32 71.88% Precinct 349 2300 3155 72.90% Precinct 350 2814 3724 75.56% Precinct 351 2245 3154 71.18% Precinct 352 767 1140 67.28% Precinct 353 1916 2319 82.62% Precinct 354 3585 4282 83.72% Precinct 355 2825 3621 78.02% Precinct 356 1581 2119 74.61% Precinct 357 1334 1758 75.88% Precinct 358 2469 3132 78.83% Precinct 359 2265 2907 77.92% Precinct 360 2748 3703 74.21% Precinct 361 1591 2193 72.55% Precinct 362 3352 3978 84.26% Precinct 363 3297 3961 83.24% Precinct 364 4142 4738 87.42% Statement of Ballots Cast Page:2 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:16:08 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Precinct Ballots Reg.Turnout Cast Voters Pct. Precinct 365 2814 3144 89.50% Precinct 366 2109 2556 82.51% Precinct 367 3675 4323 85.01% Precinct 368 3503 4343 80.66% Precinct 369 1676 2089 80.23% Precinct 370 2031 2428 83.65% Precinct 371 2083 2485 83.82% Precinct 372 1679 1910 87.91% Precinct 373 285 342 83.33% Precinct 374 12 13 92.31% Precinct 375 255 297 85.86% Precinct 376 1754 2140 81.96% Precinct 377 2178 2517 86.53% Precinct 378 1705 2015 84.62% Precinct 379 6012 7818 76.90% Precinct 380 6047 7239 83.53% Precinct 381 93 108 86.11% Precinct 382 1920 2731 70.30% Precinct 383 991 1156 85.73% Precinct 384 2965 3419 86.72% Precinct 385 2267 2691 84.24% Precinct 386 2707 3071 88.15% Precinct 387 1011 1256 80.49% Precinct 388 814 1038 78.42% Precinct 389 5358 6511 82.29% Precinct 390 2029 2435 83.33% Precinct 391 293 422 69.43% Precinct 392 188 245 76.73% Precinct 393 592 666 88.89% Precinct 394 249 322 77.33% Precinct 395 5937 7390 80.34% Precinct 396 875 1111 78.76% Precinct 397 2290 2776 82.49% Precinct 398 1532 1767 86.70% Precinct 399 2061 2554 80.70% Precinct 400 3177 4043 78.58% Precinct 401 1677 1902 88.17% Prednd 402 6795 8172 83.15% Precinct 403 1271 1515 83.89% Precinct 404 5139 6548 78.48% Precinct 405 7106 8481 83.79% Precinct 406 379 530 71.51% Precinct 407 1677 1888 88.82% Precinct 408 89 121 73.55% Precinct 409 4088 5182 78.89% Precinct 410 2720 3310 82.18% Precinct 411 59 74 79.73% Precinct 412 1717 2082 82.47% Precinct 413 913 1156 78.98% Precinct 414 540 664 81.33% Precinct 415 468 518 90.35% Precinct 416 21 35 60.00% Precinct 417 1225 1593 76.90% Precinct 418 1876 2232 84.05% Precinct 419 1632 1844 88.50% Precinct 420 3102 3882 79.91% Precinct 421 272 316 86.08% Precinct 422 20 24 83.33% Precinct 423 2958 3918 75.50% Precinct 424 4132 4868 84.88% Precinct 425 942 1137 82.85% Precinct 426 396 471 84.08% Precinct 427 26 34 76.47% Precinct 428 1416 1848 76.62% Statement of Ballots Cast Page: 3 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:16:08 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Precinct Ballots Reg.Turnout Cast Voters Pct. Precinct 429 2561 3283 78.01% Precinct 430 1251 1442 86.75% Precinct 431 1297 1478 87.75% Precinct 432 302 381 79.27% Precinct 433 2077 2470 84.09% Precinct 434 3293 4133 79.68% Precinct 435 3647 4335 84.13% Precinct 436 2095 2369 88.43% Precinct 437 51 59 86.44% Precinct 438 242 294 82.31% Precinct 439 409 513 79.73% Precinct 440 1176 1523 77.22% Precinct 441 66 76 86.84% Precinct 442 2221 2683 82.78% y" 1 Precinct 443 8 10 80.00% : Total 10 80.00% s �; ;+:r,; Statement of Votes Cast Page: 1 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% All District Categories All Districts United States President and Vice President(Vote for 1) 273696 ballots(91 over voted,4372 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.19% Trump/Pence 83197 30.90% Clinton/Kaine 153251 56.92% Stein/Baraka 6005 2.23% JohnsonNVeld 15266 5.67% Write-in 11513 4.28% Total 269232 100.00% US Senator(Vote for 1) 273696 ballots(48 over voted, 11405 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.19% Steven C Reynolds 7701 2.94% Ron Wyden 158685 60.51% Mark Callahan 78184 29.81% Eric Navickas 5501 2.10% Jim Lindsay 3650 1.39% Shanti S Lewallen 8215 3.13% Write-in 307 0.12% Total 262243 100.00% US Representative,1st District(Vote for 1) 273696 ballots(13 over voted, 18233 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.19% Brian J Heinrich 92442 36.19% Suzanne Bonamici 154293 60.40% Kyle Sheahan 8236 3.22% Write-in 479 0.19% Total 255450 100.00% Governor(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(39 over voted, 12577 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% James Foster 6965 2.67% Kate Brown 143278 54.99% Cliff Thomason 5798 2.23% Aaron Donald Auer 1800 0.69% Bud Pierce 102282 39.26% Write-in 424 0.16% Total 260547 100.00% Secretary of State(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(33 over voted,20313 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Sharon L Durbin 6795 2.69% Dennis Richardson 111234 44.00% Paul Damian Wells 8466 3.35% Brad Avakian 118895 47.03% Alan Zundel 5678 2.25% Michael Marsh 1380 0.55% Write-in 370 0.15% Total 252818 100.00% State Treasurer(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(11 over voted,24888 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Chris Henry 10404 4.19% Tobias Read 121328 48.87% Jeff Gudman 95334 38.40% Chris Telfer 20799 8.38% Write-in 402 0.16% Statement of Votes Cast Page:2 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast: 273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% Total 248267 100.00% Attorney General(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(9 over voted,26294 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Lars D H Hedbor 8401 3.40% Ellen Rosenblum 145583 58.97% Daniel Zene Crowe 92405 37.43% Write-In 472 0.19% Total 246861 100.00% State Senator,12th District(Vote for 1) 6886 ballots(0 over voted,713 blank voted),8503 registered voters,turnout 80.98% Brian J Boquist 3555 57.59% Ross Swartzendruber 2603 42.17% Write-in 15 024% Total 6173 100.00% State Senator,14th District(Vote for 1) 64828 ballots(3 over voted,20154 blank voted),81497 registered voters,turnout 79.55% Mark Hass 43415 97.19% Write-in 1256 2.81% Total 44671 100.00% State Senator,18th District(Vote for 1) 30915 ballots(0 over voted,10377 blank voted),38071 registered voters,turnout 81.20% Ginny Burdick 19841 96.61% Write-in 697 3.39% Total 20538 100.00% State Representative,24th District(Vote for 1) 6886 ballots(0 over voted,560 blank voted),8503 registered voters,turnout 80.98% Ron Noble 3359 53.10% Ken Moore 2952 46.66% Write-in 15 0.24% Total 6326 100.00% State Representative,25th District(Vote for 1) 1 ballots(0 over voted,0 blank voted),2 registered voters,turnout 50.00% Sharon P Freeman 1 100.00% Bill Post 0 0.00% Write-in 0 0.00% Total 1 100.00% State Representative,26th District(Vote for 1) 26922 ballots(2 over voted,2432 blank voted),32417 registered voters,turnout 83.05% Ray M Lister 10915 44.57% A Richard Vial 13547 55.32% Write-in 25 0.10% Total 24487 100.00% State Representative,27th District(Vote for 1) 34064 ballots(1 over voted, 11915 blank voted),41560 registered voters,turnout 81.96% Sheri Malstrom 21659 97.79% Write-in 489 2.21% Total 22148 100.00% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 3 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters:341315,Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% State Representative,28th District(Vote for 1) 30764 ballots(2 over voted,4062 blank voted),39937 registered voters,turnout 77.03% Jeff Barker 17107 64.07% Gary M Carlson 9481 35.51% Write-in 112 0.42% Total 26700 100.00% State Representative,29th District(Vote for 1) 26414 ballots(2 over voted,2241 blank voted),35021 registered voters,turnout 75.42% Juanita Lint 9633 40.68% Susan McLain 14248 58.95% Write-in 90 0.37% Total 24171 100.00% State Representative,30th District(Vote for 1) 32386 ballots(3 over voted,3015 blank voted),41665 registered voters,turnout 77.73% Janeen Sollman 15336 52.22% Kyle Markley 2498 8.51% Dan Mason 11473 39.07% Write-in 61 0.21% Total 29368 100.00% State Representative,31st District(Vote for 1) 5519 ballots(0 over voted, 1056 blank voted),6801 registered voters,turnout 81.15% Brad Witt 3664 82.10% Robert Miller 762 17.07% Write-in 37 0.83% Total 4463 100.00% State Representative,32nd District(Vote for 1) 5900 ballots(0 over voted,593 blank voted),7217 registered voters,turnout 81.75% Bruce L Bobek 2940 55.40% Deborah Boone 2343 44.15% Write-in 24 0.45% Total 5307 100.00% State Representative,33rd District(Vote for 1) 26186 ballots(1 over voted,2884 blank voted),31014 registered voters,turnout 84.43% Mitch Greenllck 14780 63.43% John Verbeek 8465 36.33% Write-in 56 0.24% Total 23301 100.00% State Representative,34th District(Vote for 1) 32915 ballots(1 over voted,4347 blank voted),41209 registered voters,turnout 79.87% Donald E Hershiser 9875 34.57% Ken Helm 18606 65.13% Write-in 86 0.30% Total 28567 100.00% State Representative,35th District(Vote for 1) 30915 ballots(0 over voted,4442 blank voted),38071 registered voters,turnout 81.20% Margaret Doherty 15895 60.04% Jessica L Cousineau 10480 39.59% Write-in 98 0.37% Total 26473 100.00% Statement of Votes Cast Page:4 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast: 273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% State Representative,37th District(Vote for 1) 14292 ballots(0 over voted, 1235 blank voted), 17898 registered voters,turnout 79.85% Ryan R Haffner 351 2.69% Paul Southwick 6023 46.13% Julie Parrish 6655 50.97% Write-in 28 0.21% Total 13057 100.00% Judge of the Supreme Court,Position 6(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(4 over voted, 113574 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Lynn R Nakamoto 156144 97.84% Write-in 3447 2.16% Total 159591 100.00% Judge of the Court of Appeals,Position 5(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(3 over voted, 116696 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Scott Shorr 153392 98.03% Write-in 3077 1.97% Total 156469 100.00% Judge of the Court of Appeals,Position 8(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(3 over voted,120274 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Roger J DeHoog 149849 98.01% Write-in 3043 1.99% Total 152892 100.00% Judge of the Circuit Court,20th District,Position 14(Vote for 1) 273165 ballots(3 over voted,119680 blank voted)c341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Ramon Pagan 150498 98.05% Write-in 2988 1.95% Total 153486 100.00% City of Banks Mayor(Vote for 1) 821 ballots(0 over voted,123 blank voted), 1077 registered voters,turnout 76.23% Brian Hughes 299 42.84% Peter C Edison 389 55.73% Write-in 10 1.43% Total 698 100.00% City of Banks Council-Position 2(Vote for 1) 821 ballots(0 over voted,301 blank voted),1077 registered voters,turnout 76.23% Michael Nelson 505 97.12% Write-In 15 2.88% Total 520 100.00% City of Banks Council-Position 4(Vote for 1) 821 ballots(1 over voted, 176 blank voted), 1077 registered voters,turnout 76.23% Dale A Wiita 55 8.54% Gene W Stout 282 43.79% Stephanie Jones 302 46.89% Write-in 5 0.78% Total 644 100.00% City of Banks Council-Position 6(Vote for 1) 821 ballots(0 over voted,204 blank voted), 1077 registered voters,turnout 76.23% Teri Branstitre 358 58.02% Scott T Nagler 252 40.84% Write-in 7 1.13% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 5 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% Total 617 100.00% City of Beaverton Mayor(Vote for 1) 44258 ballots(0 over voted,14315 blank voted),55412 registered voters,turnout 79.87% Denny Doyle 28892 96.49% Write-in 1051 3.51% Total 29943 100.00% City of Beaverton Council Pos 3(Vote for 1) 44258 ballots(0 over voted,17915 blank voted),55412 registered voters,turnout 79.87% Mark Fag In 25806 97.95% Write-in 539 2.05% Total 26345 100.00% City of Beaverton Council Pos 4(Vote for 1) 44258 ballots(0 over voted, 18401 blank voted),55412 registered voters,turnout 79.87% Cate Arnold 25348 98.02% Write-in 511 1.98% Total 25859 100.00% City of Cornelius Mayor(Vote for 1) 4050 ballots(1 over voted,1269 blank voted),5620 registered voters,turnout 72.06% Jeffrey C Dalin 2652 95.40% Write-In 128 4.60% Total 2780 100.00% City of Cornelius Council(Vote for 2) 4050 ballots(0 over voted,3485 undervotes),5620 registered voters,turnout 72.06% Steven Heinrich 2273 49.25% Dave Schamp 2194 47.54% Write-in 98 2.12% Write-in 50 1.08% Total 4615 100.00% City of Durham Council(Vote for 3) 873 ballots(1 over voted,802 undervotes), 1111 registered voters,turnout 78.58% Ron Willesen 272 14.99% Pete Bryant 265 14.61% Leslie J Gifford 427 23.54% Chuck Van Meter 430 23.70% Keith Jehnke 394 21.72% Write-in 18 0.99% Write-in 4 0.22% Write-In 4 0.22% Total 1814 100.00% City of Forest Grove Council(Vote for 3) 10133 ballots(22 over voted,9064 undervotes),13258 registered voters,turnout 76.43% Timothy Rippe 3968 18.66% Elena Uhing 4402 20.70% Richard G Kidd III 3522 16.56% Victoria Lowe 3575 16.81% Matt Vandehey 5474 25.74% Write-in 228 1.07% Write-in 64 0.30% Write-in 36 0.17% Total 21269 100.00% Statement of Votes Cast Page:6 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702,Registered Voters:341315,Overall Turnout:80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% City of Gaston Council Pos 1 (Vote for 1) 285 ballots(0 over voted,33 blank voted),357 registered voters,turnout 79.83% Don Richter 140 55.56% Margaret E Bell 108 42.86% Write-in 4 1.59% Total 252 100.00% City of Gaston Council Pos 2(Vote for 1) 285 ballots(0 over voted,43 blank voted),357 registered voters,turnout 79.83% Gail Y Lorenz 104 42.98% David Meeker 134 55.37% Write-in 4 1.65% Total 242 100.00% City of Gaston Council Pos 3(Vote for 1) 285 ballots(0 over voted,47 blank voted),357 registered voters,turnout 79.83% Rick Lorenz 103 43.28% Bill Martin 131 55.04% Write-in 4 1.68% Total 238 100.00% City of Hillsboro Mayor(Vote for 1) 41484 ballots(4 over voted,7464 blank voted),53940 registered voters,turnout 76.91% Aron Carleson 13988 41.12% Steve Callaway 19773 58.13% Write-in 255 0.75% Total 34016 100.00% City of Hillsboro Council Ward 1 Pos B(Vote for 1) 41484 ballots(5 over voted, 10632 blank voted),53940 registered voters,turnout 76.91% Rick Van Beveren 24156 78.31% Abell Muse 6494 21.05% Write-in 196 0.64% Total 30846 100.00% City of Hillsboro Council Ward 2 Pos B(Vote for 1) 41484 ballots(10 over voted,12413 blank voted),53940 registered voters,turnout 76.91% Brenda McCoy 12048 41.46% Anthony Martin 16806 57.83% Write-in 207 0.71% Total 29061 100.00% City of Hillsboro Council Ward 3 Pos B(Vote for 1) 41483 ballots(4 over voted,11096 blank voted),53940 registered voters,turnout 76.91% Fred C Nachtigal 20617 67.86% Sandra Jafarzadeh 9544 31.41% Write-In 222 0.73% Total 30383 100.00% City of King City Council(Vote for 3) 2647 ballots(2 over voted,2703 undervotes),3132 registered voters,turnout 84.51% Gretchen E Buehner 1382 26.41% John M Boylston 1368 26.15% Denny Gelfand 1105 21.12% Smart Ocholi 1281 24.48% Write-in 71 1.36% Write-in 16 0.31% Write-in 9 0.17% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 7 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast: 273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% Total 5232 100.00% City of Lake Oswego Mayor(Vote for 1) 2 ballots(0 over voted,0 blank voted),2 registered voters,turnout 100.00% Dave Berg 0 0.00% Jon Gustafson 0 0.00% Kent Studebaker 2 100.00% Write-in 0 0.00% Total 2 100.00% City of Lake Oswego Councilor(Vote for 3) 2 ballots (0 over voted,6 undervotes),2 registered voters,turnout 100.00% Theresa Kohlhoff 0 Charles Collins 0 Skip O'Neill 0 John LaMotte 0 Write-in 0 Write-in 0 Write-in 0 Total 0 City of North Plains Mayor(Vote for 1) 1385 ballots(0 over voted,263 blank voted),1677 registered voters,turnout 82.59% Teri K Lenahan 733 65.33% Write-In 389 34.67% Total 1122 100.00% City of North Plains Council(Vote for 3) 1385 ballots(0 over voted,1682 undervotes),1677 registered voters,turnout 82.59% Robert Kindel 880 35.58% Russ R Sheldon 754 30.49% Cameron Martinez 727 29.40% Write-in 79 3.19% Write-in 19 0.77% Write-in 14 0.57% Total 2473 100.00% City of Portland Commissioner, Pos 4(Vote for 1) 804 ballots(0 over voted,220 blank voted),1044 registered voters,turnout 77.01% Chloe Eudaly 274 46.92% Steve Novick 305 52.23% Write-in 5 0.86% Total 584 100.00% City of Rivergrove Councilor(Vote for 3) 21 ballots(0 over voted,30 undervotes),30 registered voters,turnout 70.00% Brenda Ruble 10 30.30% William Tuttle 10 30.30% Ame Nyberg 11 33.33% Write-in 1 3.03% Write-in 1 3.03% Write-in 0 0.00% Total 33 100.00% City of Sherwood Mayor(Vote for 1) 9990 ballots(2 over voted,898 blank voted),11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Gail Cutsforth 3933 43.27% Krisanna Clark 5104 56.15% Write-in 53 0.58% Statement of Votes Cast Page:8 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% Total 9090 100.00% City of Sherwood Councilor(Vote for 3) 9990 ballots(8 over voted,9408 undervotes),11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Kim Young 4265 20.76% Anthony Bevel 2783 13.55% Sean Garland 3720 18.11% Daniel C King 3645 17.74% Michael Meyer 2730 13.29% Alan H Pearson 3172 15.44% Write-in 138 0.67% Write-In 52 0.25% Write-in 36 0.18% Total 20541 100.00% City of Tigard Council(Vote for 2) 26349 ballots(15 over voted,20005 undervotes),32534 registered voters,turnout 80.99% Tristan Kira Irvin 5172 15.83% Tom Anderson 10156 31.09% Jason Snider 11595 35.50% Bret Lieuallen 5335 16.33% Write-in 303 0.93% Write-in 102 0.31% Total 32663 100.00% City of Tualatin Council Pos 2(Vote for 1) 11772 ballots(3 over voted,3237 blank voted),14677 registered voters,turnout 80.21% Sonya Ambuehl 2859 33.51% Paul Morrison 5589 65.51% Write-in 84 0.98% Total 8532 100.00% City of Tualatin Council Pos 4(Vote for 1) 11772 ballots(0 over voted,4819 blank voted),14677 registered voters,turnout 80.21% Robert E Kellogg 6813 97.99% Write-in 140 2.01% Total 6953 100.00% City of Tualatin Council Pos 6(Vote for 1) 11772 ballots(0 over voted,5068 blank voted), 14677 registered voters,turnout 80.21% Joelle Davis 6552 97.73% Write-in 152 2.27% Total 6704 100.00% City of Wilsonville Mayor(Vote for 1) 302 ballots(0 over voted,82 blank voted),381 registered voters,turnout 79.27% Tim Knapp 194 88.18% Write-in 26 11.82% Total 220 100.00% City of Wilsonville Councilor(Vote for 2) 302 ballots(0 over voted,259 undervotes),381 registered voters,turnout 79.27% Kristin Alcervall 173 50.14% Susie Stevens 168 48.70% Write-in 3 0.87% Write-In 1 0.29% Total 345 100.00% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 9 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast: 273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% West Multnomah SWCD Dir At Large 1 (Vote for 1) 93 ballots(0 over voted,88 blank voted), 108 registered voters,turnout 86.11% Write-in 5 100.00% Total 5 100.00% West Multnomah SWCD Dir Zone 1 (Vote for 1) 93 ballots(0 over voted,52 blank voted),108 registered voters,turnout 86.11% Kimberly Peterson 41 100.00% Write-in 0 0.00% Total 41 100.00% West Multnomah SWCD Dir Zone 2(Vote for 1) 93 ballots(0 over voted,54 blank voted), 108 registered voters,turnout 86.11% Jane Hartline 39 100.00% Write-in 0 0.00% Total 39 100.00% West Multnomah SWCD Dir Zone 3(Vote for 1) 93 ballots(0 over voted,55 blank voted),108 registered voters,turnout 86.11% George Sowder 38 100.00% Write-In 0 0.00% Total 38 100.00% Tualatin SWCD Dir At Large 1 (Vote for 1) 273072 ballots(4 over voted, 122878 blank voted),341207 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Steven Vangrunsven 147876 98.46% Write-in 2317 1.54% Total 150193 100.00% Tualatin SWCD Dir Zone 1 (Vote for 1) 273072 ballots(3 over voted,125937 blank voted),341207 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Jerry Ward 144893 98.48% Write-In 2242 1.52% Total 147135 100.00% Tualatin SWCD Dir Zone 2(Vote for 1) 273072 ballots(3 over voted, 126037 blank voted),341207 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Eldon Jossi 144751 98.45% Write-in 2284 1.55% Total 147035 100.00% Measure 94 State Judges Retirement Age(Vote for 1) 273164 ballots(49 over voted, 18485 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 95314 37.43% No 159315 62.57% Total 254629 100.00% Measure 95 Public University Equities(Vote for 1) 273163 ballots(18 over voted,23014 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 184088 73.60% No 66042 26.40% Total 250130 100.00% Measure 96 State Lottery Fund(Vote for 1) 273164 ballots(16 over voted,13870 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 212438 81.93% No 46839 18.07% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 10 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast: 273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% Total 259277 100.00% Measure 97 State Corporate Tax(Vote for 1) 273164 ballots(86 over voted,8315 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 108253 40.89% No 156510 59.11% Total 264763 100.00% Measure 98 State Career Funding(Vote for 1) 273164 ballots(30 over voted, 15628 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 174497 67 76% No 83009 32.24% Total 257506 100.00% Measure 99 State Outdoor School Fund(Vote for 1) 273164 ballots(24 over voted, 14600 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 175787 67.99% No 82753 32.01% Total 258540 100.00% Measure 100 State Wildlife(Vote for 1) 273164 ballots(30 over voted,20950 blank voted),341315 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 183987 72.96% No 68199 27.04% Total 252186 100.00% 34-250 City of Beaverton Bond(Vote for 1) 44258 ballots(2 over voted,3484 blank voted),55412 registered voters,turnout 79.87% Yes 20604 50.54% No 20167 49.46% Total 40771 100.00% 34-251 City of Beaverton MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 44258 ballots(1 over voted, 1991 blank voted),55412 registered voters,turnout 79.87% Yes 31005 73.36% No 11261 26.64% Total 42266 100.00% 34-266 City of Cornelius MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 4050 ballots(2 over voted,161 blank voted),5620 registered voters,turnout 72.06% Yes 2738 70.44% No 1149 29.56% Total 3887 100.00% 34-267 City of Cornelius Fuel Tax(Vote for 1) 4050 ballots(0 over voted, 187 blank voted),5620 registered voters,turnout 72.06% Yes 1105 28.60% No 2758 71.40% Total 3863 100.00% 34-249 City of Forest Grove MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 10133 ballots(0 over voted,318 blank voted), 13258 registered voters,turnout 76.43% Yes 7351 74.90% No 2464 25.10% Total 9815 100.00% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 11 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts, All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% 34-265 City of Gaston MJ Prohibit(Vote for 1) 285 ballots(0 over voted,3 blank voted),357 registered voters,turnout 79.83% Yes 145 51.42% No 137 46.58% Total 282 100.00% 34-252 City of Hillsboro MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 41483 ballots(3 over voted, 1725 blank voted),53940 registered voters,turnout 76.91% Yes 30021 75.52% No 9733 24.48% Total 39754 100.00% 34-270 King City MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 2647 ballots(0 over voted,90 blank voted),3132 registered voters,turnout 84.51% Yes 1992 77.90% No 565 22.10% Total 2557 100.00% 34-271 King City Fuel Tax(Vote for 1) 2647 ballots(0 over voted,104 blank voted),3132 registered voters,turnout 84.51% Yes 1078 42.39% No 1465 57.61% Total 2543 100.00% 34-258 City of Sherwood Charter Budget(Vote for 1) 9990 ballots(0 over voted, 1551 blank voted),11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Yes 3602 42.68% No 4837 57.32% Total 8439 100.00% 34-259 City of Sherwood Charter Recording(Vote for 1) 9990 ballots(1 over voted,1779 blank voted), 11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Yes 5135 62.55% No 3075 37.45% Total 8210 100.00% 34-260 City of Sherwood Charter Compensation(Vote for 1) 9990 ballots(1 over voted, 1371 blank voted),11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Yes 3160 36.67% No 5458 63.33% Total 8618 100.00% 34-261 City of Sherwood Charter Mayor Term(Vote for 1) 9990 ballots(2 over voted,907 blank voted),11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Yes 2711 29.85% No 6370 70.15% Total 9081 100.00% 34-262 City of Sherwood Charter Ordinance Revised(Vote for 1) 9980 ballots(1 over voted,2421 blank voted), 11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Yes 3894 51.45% No 3674 48.55% Total 7568 100.00% 34-263 City of Sherwood MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 9990 ballots(1 over voted,566 blank voted), 11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Yes 7714 81.86% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 12 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast: 273702, Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% No 1709 18.14% Total 9423 100.00% 34-264 City of Sherwood Prohibits MJ(Vote for 1) 9990 ballots(5 over voted,433 blank voted),11886 registered voters,turnout 84.05% Yes 5388 56.41% No 4164 43.59% Total 9552 100.00% 34-255 City of Tigard Light Rail Extension(Vote for 1) 26349 ballots(3 over voted, 1129 blank voted),32534 registered voters,turnout 80.99% Yes 12683 50.30% No 12534 49.70% Total 25217 100.00% 34-256 City of Tigard Fuel Tax(Vote for 1) 26349 ballots(2 over voted, 1293 blank voted),32534 registered voters,turnout 80.99% Yes 10055 40.13% No 14999 59.87% Total 25054 100.00% 34-257 City of Tigard MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 26349 ballots(0 over voted,1024 blank voted),32534 registered voters,turnout 80.99% Yes 18762 74.08% No 6563 25.92% Total 25325 100.00% 34-247 City of Tualatin Charter Term Limit(Vote for 1) 11772 ballots(1 over voted,730 blank voted),14677 registered voters,turnout 80.21% Yes 7377 66.81% No 3664 33.19% Total 11041 100.00% 34-253 City of Tualatin MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 11772 ballots(0 over voted,528 blank voted),14677 registered voters,turnout 80.21% Yes 8426 74.94% No 2818 25.06% Total 11244 100,00% 3-489 City of Lake Oswego Charter(Vote for 1) 2 ballots(0 over voted,0 blank voted),2 registered voters,turnout 100.00% Yes 2 100.00% No 0 0.00% Total 2 100.00% 3-490 City of Lake Oswego Prohibits MJ(Vote for 1) 2 ballots(0 over voted,0 blank voted),2 registered voters,turnout 100.00% Yes 2 100.00% No 0 0.00% Total 2 100.00% 3-491 City of Lake Oswego City Broadband(Vote for 1) 2 ballots(0 over voted,0 blank voted),2 registered voters,turnout 100.00% Yes 0 0.00% No 2 100.00% Total 2 100.00% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 13 November 8,2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast: 273702,Registered Voters: 341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% 26-179 PDX Housing Bond(Vote for 1) 804 ballots(0 over voted,77 blank voted),1044 registered voters,turnout 77.01% Yes 460 63.27% No 267 36.73% Total 727 100.00% 26-180 PDX MJ Tax(Vote for 1) 804 ballots(0 over voted,36 blank voted),1044 registered voters,turnout 77.01% Yes 604 78.65% No 164 21.35% Total 768 100.00% 3-485 Wilsonville Rec Center Bond(Vote for 1) 302 ballots(0 over voted,22 blank voted),381 registered voters,turnout 79.27% Yes 117 41.79% No 163 58.21% Total 280 100.00% 3-486 Wilsonville Prohibits MJ(Vote for 1) 302 ballots(0 over voted,15 blank voted),381 registered voters,turnout 79.27% Yes 151 52.61% No 136 47.39% Total 287 100.00% 26-178 Metro Renews LOL Nature(Vote for 1) 252855 ballots(36 over voted,22697 blank voted),316885 registered voters,turnout 79.79% Yes 163608 71.10% No 66512 28.90% Total 230120 100.00% 34-254 Sherwood School District Bond(Vote for 1) 12366 ballots(2 over voted,838 blank voted), 14670 registered voters,turnout 84.29% Yes 6346 55.06% No 5180 44.94% Total 11526 100.00% 34-248 Tigard-Tualatin School Bond(Vote for 1) 45041 ballots(3 over voted,2938 blank voted),55436 registered voters,turnout 81.25% Yes 25460 60.48% No 16640 39.52% Total 42100 100.00% 5-259 Vernonia School Dist Bond(Vote for 1) 23 ballots(0 over voted,0 blank voted),29 registered voters,turnout 79.31% Yes 10 43.48% No 13 56.52% Total 23 100.00% 34-269 Tualatin Soil&Water Perm Rate(Vote for 1) 273071 ballots(25 over voted,38830 blank voted),341207 registered voters,turnout 80.03% Yes 137985 58.91% No 96230 41.09% Total 234215 100.00% 34-268 Washington County Fire Dist#2 Dissolution(Vote for 1) 9488 ballots(3 over voted,740 blank voted),11412 registered voters,turnout 83.14% Yes 5486 62.73% Statement of Votes Cast Page: 14 November 8, 2016 General Election 2016-11-28 All Precincts,All Districts,All Contests 11:14:15 Official Final Total Ballots Cast:273702, Registered Voters:341315, Overall Turnout: 80.19% 143 precincts reported out of 143 total Choice Votes Vote% No 3259 37.27% Total 8745 100.00% �� - s' A .I,:f•'..,.• .- ) �: .r[:faY,y v, �J ' t.,' 1,glehir Ik HabriMit411. Moder ofAase I and Taxation end Ex-OfdOCouuty Clerk dor Washington County,do hereby cmrii y this to be a trae d o4�oigiaL � Acte: l !7D'1r {' f - 11/41 By '/ /., - oO _,"90.,,r,"_ ,f e f�� %S r7/77 NPR- "ripliiir ', 11,17104.15 -Ai ,,,,,„,_, _, 4,...,0F 'a / Elitippy..4 t ., stLor Precincts , = ,c 1 ., •--. i ..e.jt,:' i_ _A i _,,_ j_,_ , 0,,, --...1 ' ..--1 - 1„/__1_ 1 aria't fi_1-. --'1,2..,-,-)-7.... 1--:; __ ___, i 1 , c4,-1:.\\47.cri ;z r , , , ,,,..w.,.;....,L,...,._ Williall_ I I J—L--4--- -le - city of i A • lir 4.- l\-, .1 7 (-7.„'-"--1.". -- . --?., ' a; - .7.• ; . --'-"i I I 1 i ,1_ Tigard Oregon , i i 1 I rill., Tigard City Boundary ,.,.„ ___ ,\,r 1 *,,,-- Af , ,. _ .4 71 1 ,.,_,.) _i_ --4-0, oy,, ,..r. ...s% It .-11:-,Ii 11, r„.."':i .4-- 0 i--- l.,:r.,_,i,_ .,---(0.01.,r, f1-1 1 ••••,...D' i AMP .114711illt _trap. , ' 4 i /----- L -I-_..,-- ---g-,--: .,,--' 11-14 ,* :--T - ft(;1-1-71---, x..y) -1-E .--\. ',...,'14.4'''''44-1--",,i,. _.1 ipp P .....„.4,...._ , ._,-Ii 409 -',..-- , 1...-i _... _ 4/. ':-ci 4— i litr' ,...._.-1-, L!, I '----7 r:lil ,L., ..4.71:4_,__:top-:.51,,,;.,,, : ' 414"--r454 4.14_ ---,irrA...1 , , -..,- - - , i_, ;eartE - _ L .--,- , 1,, gill, ' 1 es'-'1\-1-:f7-;. 41-'-' ' '1 '''''''''''''''-'--6\-ri----'. -4's--; ,,---1-- , 'y Jvil-if.) 1.-d (---c- ' ‘-, '-„_ --r - , . . _ \ a ps...... ,._________.,_,:,-_:,-,..„..___4. , , ......,.....c.lc AT2.14,7:, - , . WWI X 1 , 6_„...,, , t ,, . ; Y -k 4-4-1 iy , /' L. ^ ' � ( / | / ^l / r/ i . / | .�-, ,. ` \ \ ,,,,39_6,'_,_-_1134.:5:---, 7 5;1 2,52:: ' 281. 21.14-, -- -, ,-rt-,,, ‘41 Map Created 5 21,2015 3 N . Ith * _____.f) \ „,,-, w '/ - -- °� / wn T'' � ` __i __ AIS-2835 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Appoint Budget Committee Members Prepared For: Toby LaFrance, Finance and Information Services Submitted By: Liz Lutz, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall the City Council appoint Stephanie Veal and Rajendra Patel to three-year terms, ending December 31, 2019 and Thomas Schweizer to finish Quinton Herald's term, ending December 31, 2018, and William Ludwig as an alternate for a one-year term beginning January 1, 2017? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve the recommended appointments to the Budget Committee. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Bill Bigcraft and Don Fisher's budget committee terms expire on December 31, 2016. Additionally, Quinton Herald moved outside of the City of Tigard and had to resign from the budget committee, which opened up his position, expiring on December 31, 2018. Thomas Schweizer's position as a non-voting alternate also expires on December 31.2016. As a result, the Appointments Advisory Committee (Mayor Cook and Councilor Snider), recently conducted interviews with several citizens who applied to become members of the budget Committee. The Appointments Advisory Committee interviewed 8 citizen candidates. The committee is recommending the City Council appoint Stephanie Veal and Rajendra Patel to a three-year term, ending December 31, 2019. The committee also recommends Thomas Schweizer to replace Quinton Herald, whose term expires on December 31, 2018. Lastly, the committee recommends the non-voting alternate be William Ludwig for a one-year term, ending December 31, 2017. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could decide to not approve some, or all of the recommendations. This would require reopening the recruitment. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS City will maximize the effectiveness of the volunteer spirit to accomplish the greatest good for our community. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION NA Attachments Resolution Member bio CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION APPOINTING STEPHANIE VEAL, RAJENDRA PATEL AND TOM SCHWEIZER TO THE BUDGET COMMITTEE AND APPOINTING WILLIAM LUDWIG AS AN ALTERNATE MEMBER. WHEREAS, two positions are open on the city's budget committee due to Bill Bigcraft and Don Fisher completing their established term,and Thomas Schweizer has completed his term as an alternate member; WHEREAS,an additional position is open to fill Quinton Harold's position,ending December 31,2018,as he moved outside of the city limts; WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee conducted interviews of several individuals on November 7,2016;and WHEREAS,the Appointments Advisory Committee has recommended that Stephanie Veal and Rajendra Patel be appointed to the city's Budget Committee. In addition, the committee has recommended that William Ludwig be appointed as an alternate member.Lastly,Thomas Schweizer has been recommended to fill Quinton Harold's vacant position. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Stephanie Veal is appointed to a three-year term on the City of Tigard's Budget Committee beginning January 1,2017. SECTION 2: Rajendra Patel is appointed to a three-year term on the City of Tigard's Budget Committee beginning January 1,2017. SECTION 2: Thomas Schweizer is appointed to the remainder of the term held by Quinton Harold on the City of Tigard's Budget Committee beginning January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2018. SECTION 3 : William Ludwig is appointed to a one-year term as an alternate member on the City of Tigard's Budget Committee beginning January 1,2017. SECTION 4: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2016. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 16- Page 1 Budget Committee 2017 Bio Stephanie Veal: She has lived in Tigard for 30 years. She is an accountant with local firm and is also a member of the city's Audit Committee. She loves Tigard and is eager to be more involved. Rajendra (Raj) Patel: Raj has lived in Tigard for over 16 years. He is a CFO of a hospitality company in Wilsonville. He has volunteered in sports clubs but is eager to provide value to the Budget Committee. Thomas (Tom) Schweizer: He has lived in Tigard for 17 years and for the past year,was the Budget Committee's alternate committee member. He is an Operations Manager for an IT company in Lake Oswego. William (Bill) Ludwig: Bill has lived in Tigard for only 6 short months. He has an MBA and works in financial services and mortgage banking. He has been a housing-consumer advocate and is very interested in serving the community in a financial capacity. AIS-2847 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Appointment of Planning Commission Members Prepared For: Tom McGuire, Community Development Submitted By: Doreen Laughlin, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council reappoint Brian Feeney and appoint Aaron Fahr as voting members of the Tigard Planning Commission; and appoint Nathan Jackson as a non-voting alternate member? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve a resolution reappointing Brian Feeney and appointing Aaron Fahr,whose terms will expire December 31, 2020; and appoint Nathan Jackson as an alternate member,whose term will expire December 31, 2018. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY There are two voting positions to be filled on the Tigard Planning Commission. The commission currently has two members, Brian Feeney and Matthew Muldoon,with terms due to expire December 31, 2016. Brian Feeney has served a four-year term and is eligible for reappointment; Matthew Muldoon has served two full terms and is ineligible to reapply at this time. Brian Feeney, Aaron Fahr, and Nathan Jackson were interviewed on November 9, 2016. Attachment 1 is a Resolution implementing these recommended appointees. Attachment 2 has biographical information on all recommended appointees. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could decide to not approve some or all of the recommendations. This would require reopening the recruitment. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS City of Tigard Vision Task Force: "The City will maximize the effectiveness of the volunteer spirit to accomplish the greatest good for our community." DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Resolution Biographical Information CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING BRIAN K. FEENEY AND APPOINTING AARON K. FAHR AS VOTING MEMBERS OF THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION,AND APPOINTING NATHAN C.JACKSON AS AN ALTERNATE,NON-VOTING MEMBER. WHEREAS,there are two vacancies for voting members and one vacancy for an alternate non-voting member on the Planning Commission;and WHEREAS,Brian K. Feeney was appointed as a Planning Commissioner in January,2013 to serve his first full term that expires December 31, 2016 and has applied and is eligible for reappointment to the Planning Commission;and WHEREAS, Aaron K. Fahr and Nathan C.Jackson applied for appointments to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council reappoint Brian K. Feeney as a voting member,and appoint Aaron K Fahr as a voting member with both having terms that expire December 31,2020;and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint Nathan C. Jackson as an alternate non-voting member for a term that expires December 31,2018. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Brian K. Feeney and Aaron K. Fahr are appointed to the Planning Commission as voting members to fill terms which will expire December 31,2020. SECTION 2: Nathan C.Jackson is reappointed to the Planning Commission as an alternate member to fill a term which will expire December 31,2018. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2016. Mayor-City of Tigard A'I'1'EST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 16- Page 1 Attachment 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPOINTEES BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION On December 13, 2016,Tigard City Council will consider a Resolution to reappoint Brian K. Feeney, and appoint Aaron K. Fahr as voting members of the Tigard Planning Commission, and to appoint Nathan C.Jackson as a non-voting alternate member. Brian K. Feeney has been a resident of the Tigard area for seventeen years. He is the current Vice President of the Planning Commission. He is a licensed Civil Engineering Project Manager and has over 18 years of experience with multi-discipline consulting and development expertise. Brian has volunteered in the Tigard Community for the past ten years coaching youth sports for his children—having been involved with Tigard Basketball Association (TBA),Tigard Little League (TLL), and Southside Soccer (SSC). He also volunteers at his children's schools—Mary Woodward on the Site Council, and Tigard High School. He holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering (BSCE) from Portland State University. Aaron K. Fahr recently relocated to the City of Tigard in March 2016. Growing up in southern Oregon, he has spent the last four years in the San Francisco Bay Area. Aaron has focused his career in the public accounting sector for over seventeen years and is currently employed as a Tax Director by Andersen Tax. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting and a Master's Degree in Taxation from the University of Utah, and is a licensed CPA. Aaron also serves as a current member of the Tigard Audit Committee. Nathan C.Jackson has lived in Tigard for seven years. He holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Philosophy, Economics, and Classical Studies from Willamette University. Nathan has worked as a software quality assurance analyst at Greater Giving— formerly Auctionpay—for eight years. In addition to playing music with local groups and participating in occasional volunteer projects,Nathan looks forward to expanding his service to the community as an alternate member of the Planning Commission. AIS-2789 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): 45 Minutes Agenda Title: Public Hearing for Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Prepared For: Susan Shanks Submitted By: Susan Shanks, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Business Informational Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Should the city adopt the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan and prepare a Ballot Title for the May 2017 election? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Review and discuss the proposed Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan (Plan) 2. Take testimony on the Plan 3. Vote to adopt the Plan by non-emergency Ordinance 4. Direct staff to prepare a Ballot Title for the May 2017 election pursuant to the City of Tigard Charter that requires voter approval for use of tax increment financing in an urban renewal plan KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Background The long range land use vision for the Tigard Triangle is outlined in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and further defined in the recently completed Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (TT Strategic Plan). The latter was developed with extensive public engagement and technical analysis in 2015. The TT Strategic Plan describes the desired scale and design of development and the need for pedestrian-oriented public spaces and certain kinds of uses, such as housing and neighborhood-scale goods and services. It also identifies barriers to development and various implementation strategies. Urban renewal is listed as one such strategy since, as a source of funding, it has the ability to remove barriers to development and build projects that implement the vision. As a result, the overall purpose of the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan (Plan) is to utilize tax increment financing (TIF) to support the transformation of the Triangle into an active, urban, multimodal and mixed-use district that is: •Attractive to new residents and businesses, • Connected to the city and the region, and •Built around its distinguishing natural features. The preparation of the Plan and Accompanying Report included input from a Citizen Advisory Council and a Technical Advisory Committee on the urban renewal area boundary, goals and objectives, projects, time frame, and maximum indebtedness. The public, affected taxing districts, and the Tigard Planning Commission had the opportunity to review and comment on the Plan. This report contains the following attachments for Council's review and consideration: 1. Ordinance A. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan (Exhibit A) B. Report Accompanying the Urban Renewal Plan (Exhibit B) C. Planning Commission Recommendation (Exhibit C) 2. Citizen Advisory Council Meeting Summary (Oct 24, 2016) 3. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Letter (Nov 21, 2016) Plan Summary The purpose of urban renewal is to improve specific areas of a city that are poorly developed, underdeveloped, and/or lacking in public infrastructure and amenities. All of these conditions are present in the Plan Area. The Plan proposes to remedy these problems by improving the area's transportation and utility infrastructure since these kinds of improvements can unlock an area's development potential. It also proposes to fund projects that will spur private investment that would otherwise not happen under normal market conditions. The Plan also includes projects for creating more public gathering and walking places to realize the community's vision for this area to become a more walkable and complete community with open spaces, trails, and parks. The Plan Area consists of approximately 547.9 total acres: 383.04 acres of land in tax lots and 165.16 acres of public rights-of-way. The proposed maximum indebtedness, the limit on the amount of funds that may be spent on administration, projects and programs in the Plan Area is $188,000,000. The maximum indebtedness does not include interest paid on any borrowing by the urban renewal agency. It is anticipated that the Plan will take 35 years of tax increment collections to implement. There is a proposed financing plan in the Report that shows that the Plan is financially feasible. It is understood that the city's urban renewal agency may make changes to the financing plan, as provided by statute and the Plan, as needs and opportunities arise, typically during the annual budgeting process. Plan Approval Process The process for development and approval of the Plan has included the following steps in accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 457 and the Tigard City Charter. 1. The Plan was developed with input from a Citizen Advisory Council and a Technical Advisory Committee, each of which met four times. The Plan was also presented at an Open House on October 20, 2016, and there was opportunity for public input at both Planning Commission and City Council hearings. 2. The Tigard City Center Development Agency met on October 4, 2016 and voted unanimously to formally initiate the public review process for the Plan and Accompanying Report. 3. All affected taxing districts were sent a formal consult and confer letter with the Plan and Accompanying Report on October 5, 2016. 4. City staff briefed the County Commissioners on the Plan and Accompanying Report on October 18, 2016. 5. The Planning Commission held a hearing on November 14, 2016 and found that the Plan conformed to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and voted unanimously to recommend that the Tigard City Council adopt the Plan and Accompanying Report. 6. A notice containing information about the December 13, 2016 City Council hearing on the Plan was mailed to all Tigard registered voters on or before November 29, 2016. Notice was also placed on the City of Tigard website. 7. The City Council held a hearing on December 13, 2016 and considered adoption of the Plan and Accompanying Report by a non-emergency Ordinance. 8. Vote by Tigard voters is currently anticipated to occur on May 16, 2017. Ordinance Adopting the Plan The Ordinance adopting the Plan requires the City Council to make certain findings,which are listed in Section 1 of the Ordinance. These findings are based on various documents and events, the bases for which are described below. 1. The process for the adoption of the proposed Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and by this reference incorporated herein, has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of ORS Chapter 457; As described above, the followed the procedures outlined by ORS 457. 2. The area designated in the Plan as the Area is blighted, as defined by ORS 457.010(1) and is eligible for inclusion within the Plan because of conditions described in Section II of the Accompanying Report, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, including inadequate sidewalks, open spaces and utilities, and a prevalence of depreciated values resulting from underdevelopment and underutilization of property within the Area; This is the basic justification for the Plan, and the Council's finding is meant to make that justification explicit. 3. The rehabilitation and redevelopment described in the Plan to be undertaken by the city's urban renewal agency is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the city because absent the completion of the urban renewal projects, the Area will fail to contribute its fair share of property tax revenue to support city services and will fail to develop and/or redevelop according to the goals of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan; This finding states the public purpose for the Plan, which is for the property in the Area to develop and redevelop according to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Properly which is not developed or not fully developed and occupied does not contribute as much property tax revenue as fully developed property. The improvement of propedy in the Area will add to the tax base in the Area and further support additional economic activity in the Area. 4. The Plan conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as a whole, and provides an outline for accomplishing the projects described in the Plan, as more fully described in Chapter X of the Plan; This finding is supported by Chapter X of the Plan, and the Planning Commission's conclusion that the Plan conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C 5. In connection with any residential displacement occurring as a result of the acquisition and disposition of land, provision has been made for displaced persons in the Relocation Section of the Accompanying Report as required under applicable state and federal law; The Plan does not contemplate acquisition of property that would displace residents or businesses. Should the Plan be amended to include such acquisition, the city's urban renewal agency would be obligated to provide relocation assistance. 6. The acquisition of real property provided for in the Plan is necessary for the development of infrastructure improvements (including parking improvements) and public spaces, and for assisting in private redevelopment of the Area; The Plan authorises acquisition of real propero for infrastructure improvements. No property is specifically identified for acquisition. 7. Adoption and carrying out the Plan is economically sound and feasible in that funds are available to complete the Plan projects using urban renewal tax increment revenues derived from a division of taxes pursuant to section 1c, Article IX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457.440, and other available funding as shown in Sections V, VI, VII, and VIII of the Accompanying Report; The Accompanying Report contains information on the projected revenues and projected expenditures under the Plan and supports a finding that the Plan is economically sound andfeasible. 8. The City of Tigard shall assume and complete activities prescribed to it by the Plan; The Plan does not prescribe any specific activities to the city. 9. The city's urban renewal agency consulted and conferred with affected overlapping taxing districts prior to the Plan being forwarded to the City Council. The city s urban renewal agency sent a copy of the Plan and Accompanying Report to all affected overlapping taxing districts on October 5, 2016. These taxing districts included the City of Tigard, Tigard Tualatin School District, Northwest Regional Education Service District, Portland Community College, Port of Portland, Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue, Metro, Washington County, and the Tigard Tualatin Aquatic District. The letter included an invitation to provide comments in writing on the Plan and Accompanying Report. As of the writing of this report, Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue is the only taxing district to provide written comments on the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment 3. Six of the nine taxing districts had a representative on the Technical Advisory Committee. The Ordinance also calls for publication of a notice that City Council has adopted the Ordinance, for the recording of the Plan by the Washington County Clerk, and for transmitting the Plan to the Washington County Assessor once approved by voters. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council has four decision-making options: 1. Adopt the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan as currently proposed; 2. Adopt the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan with minor revisions read into the record; 3. Direct staff to make substantial changes to the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan and continue the public hearing to December 20 or later for final review and approval; or 4. Do not adopt the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. This would result in the city failing to complete one of the tasks required by its intergovernmental agreement with Metro for grant funds and would also result in abandoning other aspects of this project, i.e. the urban renewal educational campaign. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS City Strategic Plan Goal 1 - Facilitate walking connections to develop an identity City Strategic Plan Goal 2 - Ensure development advances the vision City Council Goal 3 - Adopt and begin Implementation of Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (TTSP) DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION 2015 - Staff completed the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (TTSP) - March - Council directed staff to submit a CPDG application to Metro for funds to implement the TTSP -June 2016 - Council directed staff to enter into an IGA with Metro for CPDG funds - February - Council awarded a contract to MIG Inc. to implement the TTSP - March - Council approved the formation/membership of a Citizen Advisory Council (CAC) for the Plan - April - Council appointed an additional CAC member - August - Staff briefed Council and Planning Commission on the Plan - September - CCDA initiated public review of the Plan—October Fiscal Impact Cost: $47,469,708 Budgeted (yes or no): No Where Budgeted (department/program):NA Additional Fiscal Notes: The estimated impact to the city's general fund in foregone revenue is $47,469,708 between the years 2019 and 2053. Attachments ATT 1 -Ordinance&Exhibits ATT 2-CAC Meeting Summary ATT 3-TVFR Comments ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND FINDINGS RELATING TO AND APPROVING THE TIGARD TRIANGLE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF APPROVAL BE PUBLISHED WHEREAS, the Tigard City Center Development Agency (the "Agency"),as the duly authorized and acting urban renewal agency of the City of Tigard, Oregon,is proposing to undertake certain urban renewal activities in a designated area within the City pursuant to ORS Chapter 457;and WHEREAS,the Agency,pursuant to the requirements of ORS Chapter 457,has caused the preparation of the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Plan"). The Plan authorizes certain urban renewal activities within the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area(the"Area");and WHEREAS, the Agency has caused the preparation of a certain Urban Renewal Report dated December 13, 2016, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Report") to accompany the Plan as required under ORS 457.085(3); and WHEREAS, the Agency forwarded the Plan and Report to the City's Planning Commission (the "Commission") for review and recommendation. The Commission considered the Plan and Report on November 14, 2016 and made a recommendation that the Plan conformed with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,attached hereto as Exhibit C (the"Planning Commission Recommendation");and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2016, representatives of the City met with the Washington County Board of Commissioners to review the Plan,including proposed maximum indebtedness for the Plan;and WHEREAS, the Plan and the Report were forwarded on October 5, 2016 to the governing body of each taxing district affected by the Plan, and the Agency has therefore consulted and conferred with each taxing district;and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council (the "City Council") received a written recommendation from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue accepting a city-proposed change to the Plan to limit Plan duration as provided for in Section VIII (D) of the Plan and to require taxing district concurrence for certain kinds of Plan amendments as provided for in Section IX(B) of the Plan;and WHEREAS,on November 29,2016 the City caused notice of the hearing to be held before the Council on the Plan,including the required statements of ORS 457.120(3),to be mailed to all electors in the City;and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016 the City Council held a public hearing to review and consider the Plan, the Report, the Planning Commission Recommendation, and the public testimony received on or before that date and to receive additional public testimony;and WHEREAS, after consideration of the record presented through this date, the City Council does by this Ordinance desire to approve the Plan. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 1 SECTION 1: The Plan complies with all requirements of ORS Chapter 457 and the specific criteria of 457.095(1) through (7), in that, based on the information provided in the Report, the Planning Commission Recommendation,and the public testimony before the City Council: 1. The process for the adoption of the Plan, has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes; 2. The area designated in the Plan as the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area is blighted, as defined by ORS 457.010(1) and is eligible for inclusion within the Plan because of conditions described in the Report in the Section "Existing Physical, Social, and Economic Conditions and Impacts on Municipal Services," including the existence of inadequate streets and other rights-of-way, open spaces, and utilities and underdevelopment of property within the Area(ORS 457.010(1)(e) and(g)); 3. The rehabilitation and redevelopment described in the Plan to be undertaken by the Agency is necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare of the City because absent the completion of urban renewal projects, the Area will fail to contribute its fair share of property tax revenues to support City services and will fail to develop and/or redevelop according to the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 4. The Plan conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and documented ancillary documents and provides an outline for accomplishing the projects described in the Plan, as more fully described in the Plan and in the Planning Commission Recommendation; 5. No residential displacement will occur as a result of the acquisition and disposition of land and redevelopment activities proposed in the Plan and therefore the Plan does not include provisions to house displaced persons; 6. The acquisition of real property provided in the Plan is necessary for the development of transportation-related infrastructure improvements in the Area and for the development of public spaces because the Agency does not own all the real property interests (e.g., rights-of-way, easements, fee ownership, etc.) that will be required to undertake and complete these projects as described in Chapter IV of the Plan and Section V of the Report; 7. Adoption and carrying out the Plan is economically sound and feasible in that eligible projects and activities will be funded by urban renewal tax revenues derived from a division of taxes pursuant to section 1c, Article IX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457.440 and other available funding as more fully described in the Section "Financial Analysis of the Plan"of the Report; 8. The City shall assume and complete any activities prescribed it by the Plan;and 9. The Agency consulted and conferred with affected overlapping taxing districts prior to the Plan being forwarded to the City Council. SECTION 2: The Tigard Urban Renewal Plan is hereby approved based upon review and consideration by the Tigard City Council of the Plan and Report, the Tigard Planning Commission Recommendation,each of which is hereby accepted,and the public testimony in the record. ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 2 SECTION 3: The City Manager shall forward forthwith to the Agency a copy of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: The Agency shall thereafter cause a copy of the Plan to be recorded in the Records of Washington County,Oregon. SECTION 5: The City Manager,in accordance with ORS 457.115,shall publish notice of the adoption of the Ordinance approving the Plan,induding the provisions of ORS 457.135,in the Tigard Times no later than four days following adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 6: This ordinance shall be effective upon certification by the County Elections Official that it has received voter approval at an election conducted on May 16,2017. PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of ,2016. Carol A. Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2016. John L.Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 3 EXHIBIT A Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Adopted by the City of Tigard December 13, 2016 Ordinance No. 16- Approved by Voters [Date] If Amendments are made to the Plan,the Resolution or Ordinance Number and date will be listed here. The amendment will be incorporated into the Plan and noted through a footnote. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Mayor John L. Cook City Council Jason Snider, Council President John Goodhouse Marland Henderson Marc Woodward Planning Commission: Calista Fitzgerald, President Brian Feeney, Vice President Michael Enloe,Alternate Y-Kang Hu Gary Jelinek Bret Lieuallen Brian McDowell Chris Middaugh Matthew Muldoon Tom Mooney,Alternate Don Schmidt City Manager Marty Wine City Attorney(Jordan Ramis PC) Dan Olsen and Shelby Rihala Community Development Director Kenny Asher Finance Director Toby LaFrance Senior Planner Susan P Shanks Associate Planner Cheryl Caines Project Planning Assistant Hannah Holloway Citizen Advisory Council John Boren Calista Fitzgerald John Goodhouse Scott Hancock Gary Jelinek Jim Long Cathy Olson Katen Patel Elise Shearer Veronica Smith David Walsh Dustin White Technical Advisory Committee Celina Baguiao, PCC Kelly Betteridge, TriMet Joshua Brooking, ODOT Buff Brown, City of Tigard Planning Cheryl Caines, City of Tigard Planning Rachael Duke, CPAH Lori Faha, City of Tigard Engineering Sean Farrelly,City of Tigard Community Development Cara Fitzpatrick, City of Tigard Finance Chris Ford, Metro Steve Kelley, Washington County Allen Kennedy, TVFR Kate Lyman, TriMet Alternate Mike McCarthy, City of Tigard Engineering Debi Mollahan, Tigard Chamber of Commerce David Moore,TTSD Carrie Pak, TVWD Jeffrey Raker, Metro Alternate Damon Reische, CWS Ryan Smith, TVWD Alternate Cassandra Ulven, TVFR Alternate Phil Wentz, TTSD Alternate Shannon Wilson, CPAH Alternate Jessica Woodruff, REACH Consultant Team Elaine Howard and Scott Vanden Bos of Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC Nick Popenuk of Tiberius Solutions,LLC Ali Danko and Rob Wyman of ECONorthwest Alex Dupey and Jon Pheanis of MIG, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. DEFINITIONS I II. INTRODUCTION 3 III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 5 IV. URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT CATEGORIES 9 V. URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS 9 VI. PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION 13 VII. RELOCATION METHODS 14 VIII. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING OF PLAN 14 IX. AMENDMENTS TO PLAN 16 X. RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL OBJECTIVES 19 XI. APPENDIX A: LEGAL DESCRIPTION 28 I. DEFINITIONS "Agency"means the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency. This Agency is responsible for administration of the urban renewal plan. In Tigard,the Agency is the City Center Development Agency(CCDA). "Area"means the properties and rights-of-way located with the Tigard Triangle urban renewal boundary. "Blight" is defined in ORS 457.010(1)(A-E)and identified in the ordinance adopting the urban renewal plan. "Board of Commissioners"means the Washington County Board of Commissioners. "City"means the City of Tigard, Oregon. "City Council"or"Council"means the Tigard City Council. "Comprehensive Plan"means the City of Tigard comprehensive land use plan and its implementing ordinances,policies, and standards. "County"means Washington County, Oregon. "Fiscal year"means the year commencing on July 1 and closing on June 30. "Frozen base"means the total assessed value including all real,personal,manufactured, and utility values within an urban renewal area at the time of adoption. The county assessor certifies the assessed value after the adoption of an urban renewal plan. "Increment"means that part of the assessed value of a taxing district attributable to any increase in the assessed value of the property located in an urban renewal area,or portion thereof, over the assessed value specified in the certified statement. "Maximum indebtedness" means the amount of the principal of indebtedness included in a plan pursuant to ORS 457.190 and does not include indebtedness incurred to refund or refinance existing indebtedness. "ORS" means the Oregon revised statutes and specifically Chapter 457, which relates to urban renewal. "Planning Commission"means the Tigard Planning Commission. "Revenue sharing"means sharing tax increment proceeds as defined in ORS 457.470. "Tax increment financing(TIF)"means the funds that are associated with the division of taxes accomplished through the adoption of an urban renewal plan. "Tax increment revenues"means the funds allocated by the assessor to an urban renewal area due to increases in assessed value over the frozen base within the area. "Urban renewal area"means a blighted area included in an urban renewal plan or an area included in an urban renewal plan under ORS 457.160. "Urban renewal plan"or"Plan"means a plan, as it exists or is changed or modified from time to time, for one or more urban renewal areas,as provided in ORS 457.085,457.095, 457.105,457.115,457.120, 457.125,457.135 and 457.220. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 1 "Urban renewal project"or"Project"means any work or undertaking carried out under ORS 457.170 in an urban renewal area. "Urban renewal report"or"Report"means the official report that accompanies the urban renewal plan pursuant to ORS 457.085(3). "Tigard Park System Master Plan"means the Park System Master Plan adopted by the Tigard City Council. "Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP)"means the Transportation System Plan adopted by the Tigard City Council. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 2 II. INTRODUCTION The Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan (Plan)was developed for the Tigard City Council (City Council)with cooperative input from a Citizen Advisory Council (CAC)and Technical Advisory Committee(TAC)that were formed for this purpose. The Plan also includes input from the community received at a public open house and several public meetings and hearings before the Planning Commission, City Council, and Washington County Board of Commissioners. Pursuant to the Tigard City Charter,this Plan will go into effect when it has been adopted by City Council and approved by Tigard voters at a public election. A. Plan Overview The Tigard Triangle is located in the northeast corner of the city. Its triangular shape is the result of the three state highways that surround it, namely OR 99W, OR 217,and Interstate 5. The long range land use and development vision for the Tigard Triangle is outlined in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and further defined in the recently completed Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (TT Strategic Plan). The latter was developed with extensive public engagement and technical analysis in 2015. The TT Strategic Plan generally describes the desired scale and design of development for the Area. It also specifically identifies the need for pedestrian amenities, multimodal transportation improvements, public spaces, and certain kinds of uses, such as housing and neighborhood-scale goods and services. Additionally,the TT Strategic Plan identifies barriers to development and how they might be overcome through specific regulatory actions, public-private partnerships, and investment strategies. Urban renewal is listed as one such strategy because it has the ability to remove barriers to development and build projects that implement the vision by utilizing tax increment financing (TIF)as a source of funding. The purpose of this Plan,therefore, is to implement the land use and development vision for the Area and support its transformation into an active, urban,multimodal, and mixed-use district that is: • Attractive to new residents and businesses, • Connected to the city and the region, and • Built around its distinguishing natural features. The Plan Area, shown in Figure 1, consists of approximately 547.9 total acres: 383.04 acres of land in tax lots and 164.86 acres of public rights-of-way. It is anticipated that the Plan will take 35 years of tax increment collections to implement. The maximum amount of indebtedness(amount of TIF for projects and programs)that may be issued for the Plan is $188,000,000 (one hundred eighty-eight million dollars.) Detailed goals and objectives developed by the community for this Plan are intended to guide TIF investment in the Area over the life of the Plan. The project category descriptions and list of projects are similarly intended to aid future decision makers when considering how best to expend funds generated by TIF. The Plan is to be administered by the city's Urban Renewal Agency,which is currently the Tigard City Center Development Agency. Substantial amendments to the Plan must be approved by City Council as outlined in Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 3 Section IX. All amendments to the Plan are to be listed numerically in this section of the Plan and then incorporated into the Plan document and noted by footnote with an amendment number and adoption date. In summary,the Plan is designed to implement the goals and policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and the vision of the TT Strategic Plan; advance the city's mission to become the most walkable city in the Pacific Northwest; and, support the area's designation as a regional Town Center. B. Urban Renewal Overview Urban renewal allows for the use of TIF, a financing source that is unique to urban renewal, to fund its projects. Tax increment revenues—the amount of property taxes generated by the increase in total assessed values in the urban renewal area from the time the urban renewal area is first established—are used to repay borrowed funds. The borrowed funds are used to pay for urban renewal projects and cannot exceed the maximum indebtedness amount set by the urban renewal plan. In general,urban renewal projects can include construction or improvement of streets, utilities, and other public facilities; assistance for rehabilitation or redevelopment of property; acquisition and re-sale of property(site assembly) from willing sellers; and improvements to public spaces. The purpose of urban renewal is to improve specific areas of a city that are poorly developed or underdeveloped,called blighted areas in ORS 457. These areas can have old or deteriorated buildings,public spaces that need improvements, streets and utilities in poor condition, a complete lack of streets and utilities altogether,or other obstacles to development. The Tigard Triangle meets the definition of blight due to its infrastructure deficiencies and number of vacant and underdeveloped lots. These blighted conditions are specifically cited in the ordinance adopting the Plan and described in detail in the accompanying Urban Renewal Report(Report). The Report accompanying the Plan contains the information required by ORS 457.085. including: • A description of the physical, social, and economic conditions in the area; • Expected impact of the Plan, including fiscal impact in light of increased services; • Reasons for selection of the Plan Area; • The relationship between each project to be undertaken and the existing conditions; • The estimated total cost of each project and the source of funds to pay such costs; • The estimated completion date of each project; • The estimated amount of funds required in the Area and the anticipated year in which the debt will be retired; • A financial analysis of the Plan; • A fiscal impact statement that estimates the impact of tax increment financing upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the urban renewal area; and • A relocation report. • Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 4 III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goals of the Plan represent its basic intents and purposes.Accompanying each goal are objectives,which generally describe how the Agency intends to achieve each goal. The urban renewal projects identified in Sections IV and V of the Plan are the specific means of meeting the objectives. The goals relate to adopted plans, as detailed in Section X, and were developed with input from the CAC and TAC. The goals and objectives will be pursued as economically as is feasible and at the discretion of the Agency. The goals and objectives are not listed in any order of importance or priority. Goal 1 –Encourage meaningful involvement by citizens, interested parties,and affected agencies throughout the life of the urban renewal district to ensure that it reflects the community's values and priorities. Objectives: 1. Invite citizens both within and outside of the boundaries of the Area, interested parties, and affected agencies to participate on urban renewal advisory committees and task forces. 2. Invite public comment at all Agency meetings. 3. Hold a public vote as required by the City Charter to use tax increment financing as a method of funding projects in the Area. Goal 2–Provide a safe and effective multimodal transportation network that provides access to,from,and within the Area and supports mixed-use and pedestrian-oriented development. Objectives: 1. Develop comfortable, interesting, and attractive streetscapes—especially along designated pedestrian streets—that build upon the Area's existing assets, improve the pedestrian experience, and support a variety of commercial and social activities, e.g. cafe seating, outdoor displays,etc. 2. Create more connections within the Area by building new streets and trails so that people of all ages and abilities can enjoy healthy and interconnected lives. 3. Create more access points into and out of the Area by building new overpasses and/or undercrossings and modifying existing intersections and/or interchanges so that the Area is more connected to downtown Tigard, Portland Community College, and other neighboring areas and businesses. 4. Provide transportation choices for all modes of travel, as appropriate,and on-street parking and vegetative stormwater facilities,where feasible, when building new streets and extending and/or modifying existing streets, including but not limited to the following: a. Shared bicycle and vehicle travel lanes along low volume streets. b. Separate bicycle and vehicle travel lanes along high volume streets. c. Sidewalks and pedestrian crossings that connect to transit(e.g. bus) stops. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 5 5. Allow transitional street improvements(i.e.temporary or partial improvements)that further the Area's transportation goals and objectives and support small, incremental development when construction of all permanent street elements is not practicable at the time of development. 6. Provide a reliable transportation system that effectively manages vehicle congestion and safely moves people, goods, and services to, from, and through the Area, with special consideration for the following: a. Pedestrian crossings of high volume streets. b. Freight trucks to, from,and through the Area. c. Transit service (e.g. buses)to, from,and through the Area. 7. Build a multi-use trail for pedestrians and bicyclists along Red Rock Creek that provides an off-street east-west connection parallel to Highway 99W and facilitates the transformation of this natural corridor into a greenway. Identify and build other off-street multi-use trails and connections as opportunities arise. 8. Develop and implement a parking management plan for the Area that supports economic development efforts,the desired land use pattern, and a balanced transportation system, including but not limited to public-private partnerships,public parking facilities,and parking enforcement. 9. Periodically evaluate the functioning of the transportation system to refine project scope and inform project prioritization. Goal 3 –Provide public utility improvements to support desired development. Objectives: 1. Develop a stormwater master plan for the Triangle and a greenway plan for Red Rock Creek. Build regional stormwater facilities where practicable. 2. Extend the public sewer system to areas served by private septic systems. 3. Permanently fix compromised sewer lines in Red Rock Creek. 4. Ensure new water mains are constructed as needed and coordinate replacement of existing water mains. 5. Encourage sustainable utility and energy usage practices. Goal 4–Create a clear identity for the Area as a fun and diverse place to live,work, shop,eat,and play by building upon existing unique and desirable features. Objectives: 1. Build public facilities that support the Area's identity as a mixed-use, multimodal, and pedestrian-oriented district, including but not limited to parks,plazas,public restrooms, recreational facilities, and non-vehicular infrastructure, e.g. bike racks, bike lockers,pedestrian shelters, and wayfinding signage. 2. Use parks,trails, stormwater facilities,and existing natural features—such as wetlands,creeks,trees/tree groves, and view corridors to create focal points that reinforce the Area's identity as a unique and special place. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 6 3. Apply distinctive and consistent sign, art, gateway, and streetscape treatments to visually distinguish the Area from surrounding areas. 4. Relocate or underground existing utilities as practicable to provide a more aesthetically pleasing pedestrian environment. Goal 5—Provide financial and technical assistance to new and existing businesses and housing developments that contribute to the Area's diversity and vitality and help it transform into a mixed-use and pedestrian-oriented district. Objectives: 1. Support new and existing businesses by providing a variety of financial and technical assistance programs that increase the diversity of goods and services available in the Area and/or contribute to the Area's liveliness and upkeep, including but not limited to façade improvement grants, streetscape improvements, site preparation, permit fee assistance,private utility extensions/upgrades, and business development incentives. 2. Form public-private partnerships and use public investment in infrastructure and public spaces/facilities to spur private development. 3. Support the development of mixed-use buildings that provide a variety of housing types and storefront spaces for a range of community and commercial needs. 4. Assist in the development of affordable and workforce housing. 5. Assemble parcels to enhance development opportunities. 6. Encourage low impact and environmentally sustainable building practices wherever practicable. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 7 Figure 1 —Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Area Boundary Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area .■. ■ 5,14 ■ i : )11 .1 , ' I ■ tl ■ J ■ • • • me J// It • NI ,EID1:1,____,_ o • • ' • L i - •1111 Il. C� • • • • ■ i i • • • liii, 1/1/ j! 1 i •• ', naliiitII-. _A H L___L_J 2 .e• a� 1_ ( 11L1 • l ...4 • mem I I l'• - s ••• •• Li i 1 �HUh2iker Rd •• � 1P • _E s .til l�__. • 27, t a • iliuL- , „ to • ,.., • ,...) • .., • • Tigard Triangle URA ••�• sly •■■■• N • ?1. • • 0 500 1,000 feet a Ye Source:ECONorthwest Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 8 IV. URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT CATEGORIES As an outcome of the goals described in the previous section,the projects within the Area fall into the following categories: • Transportation(Goal 2) • Public Utilities(Goal 3) • Public Spaces, Facilities,and Installations(Goal 4) • Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships (Goal 5) • Finance Fees and Plan Administration V. URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS Urban renewal projects authorized by the Plan are described below. A. Transportation The following transportation projects are intended to provide a safe and effective multimodal transportation network in the Area that supports mixed-use and pedestrian-oriented development through improved internal connectivity, external access, and mobility; a variety of travel options; comfortable, interesting, and attractive streetscapes; and,well-managed parking options. Table 1 —Transportation Projects Project Project Ty pe Project Description Number 1 New Hwy 217 Overpass Extend Beveland Rd south over Hwy 217 to Hunziker (Beveland) Rd/Wall St area with car,ped,and bike facilities. 2 New Street Extend 74th Ave south from 99W to Hermoso Way or (74th Ave) Beveland Rd. 3 New Street Extend Atlanta St west from 69th Ave to Dartmouth St or (Atlanta) future 74th Ave. 4 New Hwy I-5 Overpass Provide ped/bike bridge across Hwy I-5 from Beveland Rd (Beveland) to Southwood Dr. New Hwy I-5 Overpass Provide ped/bike bridge across Hwy 1-5 between the 5 (Red Rock Creek) Triangle and PCC Sylvania around location of Red Rock Creek. 6 Modified Intersection Install traffic signal and turn lanes where needed at Atlanta (Atlanta/68th) St/68th Ave intersection. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 9 Project Project Type Project Description Number 7 Modified Intersection Add protected left turn and transit improvements on 68th (99W/68th) Pkwy at 99W. Develop comfortable,interesting,and attractive streetscapes 8 Modified Streets throughout the Area,especially along designated pedestrian streets. 9 New Trail Build a new trail along Red Rock Creek parallel to and (Red Rock Creek) south of 99W. 10 New Streets Improve connectivity,circulation,and access throughout the Area with new or extended local streets. Modified Street TBD. Improve 72nd Ave corridor,including 11 (72nd Ave) intersections/interchanges.Dependent on 72nd Ave Corridor Study recommendations. Modified Street Implement access management strategies and median 12 (99W) projects in Hwy 99W Plan,including additional pedestrian crossing locations. 13 Modified Interchange Add second left turn lane on Hwy 217 northbound ramp to (99W/Hwy 217) 99W. 14 Modified Signals Upgrade signals throughout the Area with adaptive signal coordination technology. 15 Parking Management Plan Develop a plan and implement strategies for managing parking. Periodically evaluate the functioning of the transportation 16 Transportation Study system to refine project scope and inform project prioritization. B. Public Utilities The following public utility projects are intended to address infrastructure deficiencies in the Area. This list includes the development of a stormwater master plan for the Area and a greenway plan for Red Rock Creek that addresses stormwater, sewer, and recreational needs. It also includes construction of new stormwater facilities,repair of existing sewer lines, and extension or enlargement of existing water and sewer lines as needed to support desired development. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 10 Table 2—Public Utility Projects Project Project 7'pc Project Description Number Develop a stormwater master plan for the Triangle and a 1 Stormwater/Sewer greenway plan for Red Rock Creek that addresses stormwater,sewer,and recreational needs. Construct approximately three regional stormwater facilities 2 Stormwater to meet new DEQ regulations for water quantity management. 3 Sewer Extend public sewer system to areas served by private septic systems. 4 Stormwater/Sewer Permanently fix compromised sewer lines in Red Rock Creek and restore creek channel and riparian buffer. 5 Water Install new water mains as needed. C. Public Spaces, Facilities, and Installations Projects within this category are intended to support the Area's new identity as a fun and diverse place to live and visit by building upon existing unique and desirable features. When considering whether to fund a specific project within this category, the Agency shall evaluate how it meets the goals and objectives of this Plan and whether it will encourage private investment in the Area and increase assessed value over time. The Agency shall also take the city's level of service standards for parks into consideration where applicable. Level of service standards are contained in the Tigard Park System Master Plan. Projects may include, but are not limited to,the following: • Parks, such as splash pads, nature play areas, skate parks,pocket parks, linear parks, and neighborhood parks • Greenways, such as along Red Rock Creek • Recreational facilities, such as those that serve the immediate needs of Area residents • Plazas • Public restrooms • Public art • Wayfinding • Gateway installations • District signage Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 11 As part of its evaluation,the Agency should consider consulting with the private development community to identify the kinds of amenities that would catalyze private sector development, particularly housing and mixed-use development. D. Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships Projects within this category are intended to contribute to the Area's diversity and vitality by providing assistance to new and existing businesses and housing developments. Projects include, but are not limited to,the following: • Facade improvement grants/loans • Streetscape improvements • Technical, code, and/or fee assistance • Site assembly • Site clean-up/preparation • Site acquisition • Partnerships that facilitate housing and mixed use developments E. Finance Fees and Plan Administration This category allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation of the Plan, including but not limited to ongoing administration and financing costs associated with issuing long-and short-term debt,relocation costs, and other administrative costs. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 12 VI. PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION The Plan authorizes the acquisition and disposition of property as described in this section. Property includes any and all interests in property, including fee simple ownership, lease, easements, licenses,or other rights to use. If property is acquired it will be identified in the Plan through a Minor Amendment, as described in Section IX. Identification of property to be acquired and its anticipated disposition is required by ORS 457.085(g). A. Property acquisition for public improvements The Agency may acquire any property within the Area for the public improvement projects undertaken pursuant to the Plan by all legal means, including use of eminent domain. Good faith negotiations for such acquisitions must occur prior to institution of eminent domain procedures. B. Property acquisition from willing sellers The Plan authorizes Agency acquisition of any interest in property within the Area that the Agency finds is necessary for private redevelopment,but only in those cases where the property owner wishes to convey such interest to the Agency. The Plan does not authorize the Agency to use the power of eminent domain to acquire property from a private party to transfer property to another private party for private redevelopment. Property acquisition from willing sellers may be required to support development of projects within the Area. C. Land disposition The Agency will dispose of property acquired for a public improvement project by conveyance to the appropriate public agency responsible for the construction and/or maintenance of the public improvement. The Agency may retain such property during the construction of the public improvement. The Agency may dispose of property acquired under Subsection B of this Section VI by conveying any interest in property acquired. Property shall be conveyed at its fair reuse value. Fair reuse value is the value,whether expressed in terms of rental or capital price, at which the urban renewal agency, in its discretion, determines such land should be made available in order that it may be developed, redeveloped,cleared, conserved, or rehabilitated for the purposes specified in the Plan.Because fair reuse value reflects limitations on the use of the property to those purposes specified in the Plan,the value may be lower than the property's fair market value. Where land is sold or leased,the purchaser or lessee must agree to use the land for the purposes designated in the Plan and to begin and complete the building of its improvements within a period of time that the Agency determines is reasonable. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 13 VII. RELOCATION METHODS When the Agency acquires occupied property under the Plan,residential or commercial occupants of such property shall be offered relocation assistance, as required under applicable state law. Prior to such acquisition,the Agency shall adopt rules and regulations, as necessary, for the administration of relocation assistance.No specific acquisitions that would result in relocation benefits have been identified;however,there are plans to acquire land for infrastructure which may trigger relocation benefits in the future in the Area. VIII. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING OF PLAN Tax increment financing consists of using annual tax increment revenues to make payments on debt, usually in the form of bank loans or revenue bonds. The proceeds of the bonds are used to finance the urban renewal projects authorized in the Plan. Bonds may be either long-term or short-term. Tax increment revenues equal most of the annual property taxes imposed on the cumulative increase in assessed value within an urban renewal area over the total assessed value at the time an urban renewal plan is adopted. (Under current law,the property taxes for general obligation (GO)bonds and local option levies approved after October 6, 2001 are not part of the tax increment revenues.) A. General description of the proposed financing methods The Plan will be financed using a combination of revenue sources. These include: • Tax increment revenues; • Advances, loans, grants, and any other form of financial assistance from federal, state, or local governments, or other public bodies; • Loans, grants, dedications, or other contributions from private developers and property owners, including,but not limited to,assessment districts; and • Any other public or private source. Revenues obtained by the Agency will be used to pay or repay the costs, expenses, advancements, and indebtedness incurred in(1)planning or undertaking project activities, or(2) otherwise exercising any of the powers granted by ORS Chapter 457 in connection with the implementation of this Plan. B. Tax increment financing and maximum indebtedness The Plan may be financed, in whole or in part,by tax increment revenues allocated to the Agency, as provided in ORS Chapter 457. The ad valorem taxes, if any, levied by a taxing district in which all or a portion of the Area is located, shall be divided as provided in Section 1 c, Article IX of the Oregon Constitution, and ORS 457.440. Amounts collected pursuant to ORS 457.440 shall be deposited into the unsegregated tax collections account and distributed to the Agency based upon the distribution schedule established under ORS 311.390. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 14 The maximum amount of indebtedness that may be issued or incurred under the Plan,based upon good faith estimates of the scope and costs of projects in the Plan and the schedule for their completion is $188,000,000 (one hundred and eighty-eight million dollars). This amount is the principal of such indebtedness and does not include interest or indebtedness incurred to refund or refinance existing indebtedness or interest earned on bond proceeds. It does include initial bond financing fees and interest earned on tax increment proceeds, separate from interest on bond proceeds. C. Plan Evaluation During the fifteenth (15th)year of the Plan, the Agency shall undertake a financial analysis of the Plan, including updated projections for tax increment finance revenues, and evaluate the ability of the Plan to achieve its maximum indebtedness by the anticipated expiration date in fiscal year 2052-53. The Agency shall consult and confer with affected taxing districts regarding the results of this financial update and will consider revenue sharing if revenues are exceeding projections. D. Plan Duration The Agency intends that it not collect tax increment revenues for the Area after FYE 2053. The Agency shall not initiate any urban renewal projects in the Area unless the Agency reasonably projects it will be able to pay for those projects from the proceeds of indebtedness issued on or before FYE 2053, and from other funds available to the Agency. Except as provided in the next sentence, all indebtedness that is secured by the tax increment revenues of the Area shall mature no later than FYE 2053, and the Agency shall structure all its indebtedness so that it can be paid in full from the tax increment revenues of the Area that the Agency reasonably projects it will receive on or before FYE 2053. The Agency may issue refunding indebtedness that matures after FYE 2053, only if issuing that refunding indebtedness is necessary to avoid a default on previously-issued indebtedness. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 15 IX. AMENDMENTS TO PLAN The Plan may be amended as described in this section. A. Substantial Amendments Substantial Amendments, in accordance with ORS 457.085(2)(i), shall require the same notice, hearing, and approval procedure required of the original Plan, under ORS 457.095, including public involvement, consultation with taxing districts,presentation to the Agency,the Planning Commission, and adoption by the City Council by non-emergency ordinance after a hearing. Notice of such hearing shall be provided to individuals or households within the City of Tigard, as required by ORS 457.120.Notice of adoption of a Substantial Amendment shall be provided in accordance with ORS 457.095 and 457.115. Substantial Amendments are amendments that:1 1. Add land to the urban renewal area, except for an addition of land that totals not more than 1%of the existing area of the urban renewal area; or 2. Increase the maximum amount of indebtedness that can be issued or incurred under the Plan. B. Amendments Requiring Concurrence Amendments requiring written concurrence of taxing districts imposing at least 75%of the amount of taxes imposed under permanent rate limits in the urban renewal area are amendments that: 1. Increase the maximum amount of indebtedness that can be issued or incurred under the Plan. Increasing the maximum indebtedness is also a substantial amendment, as defined above and must also meet the requirements of Section IX (A)of this Plan. 2. Extend the duration provision as defined in Section VIII (D)of the Plan. In addition to obtaining concurrence, extending the duration of the Plan requires approval of the Agency and City Council by resolution. C. Minor Amendments Minor Amendments are amendments that are not Substantial Amendments as defined in ORS 457 or Amendments Requiring Concurrence as defined in this Plan. Minor Amendments require approval of the Agency by resolution. I Unless otherwise permitted by state law,no land equal to more than 20 percent of the total land area of the original Plan shall be added to the urban renewal area by amendments,and the aggregate amount of all amendments increasing the maximum indebtedness may not exceed 20 percent of the Plan's initial maximum indebtedness,as adjusted,as provided by law. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 16 D. Amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and/or Tigard Community Development Code. Amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and/or Tigard Community Development Code that affect the Plan and/or the Area shall be incorporated automatically within the Plan without any separate action required by the Agency or City Council. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 17 Figure 2—Comprehensive Plan Designations Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area Comprehensive Plan Designations \5FeN •''moi 9)�aR r �.> '■■■�r Via` r f■d r �Nh ti a hall`yc)', tOt "tom t \•41.4illik S S4, 90' 'fir.s M ______i_ ._ I M •S 1 y4ry.11, ` "t Rd Comprehensive Plan \;:iiik General Commercial i fig Professional Commercial • • Medium Density Residential • Mixed Use Employmentsiiiiir' 1.1Light Industrial �� ti 0' Tigard Triangle URA W Source:ECONorthwest Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 18 X. RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL OBJECTIVES ORS 457.085 requires that the Plan conform to local objectives. This section provides that analysis.Relevant local planning and development objectives are contained within the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.500 Zoning Districts, Tigard Transportation System Plan, and Tigard Park System Master Plan. The following section describes the purpose and intent of these plans,the main applicable goals and policies within each plan, and an explanation of how the Plan relates to the applicable goals and policies. The numbering of the goals and policies within this section reflects the numbering that occurs in the original document.Italicized text is text that has been taken directly from an original document. Comprehensive Plan designations for all land in the Area are shown in Figure 2. All proposed land uses conform to Figure 2. Maximum densities and building requirements for all land in the Area are contained in the Tigard Community Development Code. A. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1: Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policies: 3. The City shall establish special citizen advisory boards and committees to provide input to the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff. 4. The City shall provide staff and financial support to the Committee for Citizen Involvement and any other appointed board or committee. 5. The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the community. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A) opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B) information on issues in an understandable form. Policies: 1. The City shall ensure pertinent information is readily accessible to the community and presented in such a manner that even technical information is easy to understand. 2. The City shall utilize such communication methods as mailings,posters, newsletters, the internet, and any other available media to promote citizen involvement and continue to evaluate the effectiveness of methods used. 3. The City shall work to maximize citizen involvement through education and accessibility. 4. The City shall ensure citizens receive a timely response from policy-makers regarding recommendations made through the citizen involvement program. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 19 S. The City shall seek citizen participation and input through collaboration with community organizations, interest groups, and individuals in addition to City sponsored boards and committees. 6. The City shall provide opportunities for citizens to communicate to Council, boards and commissions, and staff regarding issues that concern them. The Plan conforms to Citizen Involvement Goals 1.1 and 1.2, as a Citizen Advisory Council (CAC)was formed to help develop the Plan. The CAC included representatives from neighborhood organizations, the business and development community, and standing city advisory committees on land use,transportation, etc. They met four times to review the boundary, goals and objectives, finances,and draft Plan and Report. There was also an open house where citizens were given information on the proposed Plan and public meetings and hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council where citizens had the opportunity to comment on the proposed Plan. The Plan was voted on by the citizens of Tigard in May of 2017. Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space Goal 8.1: Provide a wide variety of high quality park and open spaces for all residents, including both: A) developed areas with facilities for active recreation; and B) undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. Policies: 1. Tigard shall acquire, develop, and maintain a diverse system of parks, trails, open space, and recreational facilities that are safe,functional, and accessible to all of its population. 2. The City shall preserve, and where appropriate, acquire and improve natural areas located within a half mile of every Tigard resident to provide passive recreational opportunities. 3. The City shall seek to achieve or exceed the ideal park service level standard of 11.0 acres of parkland per thousand population. 4. The City shall endeavor to develop neighborhood parks[or neighborhood park facilities within other parks, such as a linear park]located within a half mile of every resident to provide access to active and passive recreation opportunities for residents of all ages. S. The City shall develop other parks, including linear parks, special use facilities, urban plazas, skate parks, and pet arenas, consistent with the descriptions and standards contained in the park system master plan. 9. The City shall integrate green concepts into park and open space design, maintenance, and operations. 20. The City shall continue to improve access to neighborhood parks and other facilities in order to serve all citizens, regardless of ability. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 20 Goal 8.2: Create a Citywide network of interconnected on-and off-road pedestrian and bike trails. Policies: 1. The City shall create an interconnected regional and local system of on-and off-road trails and paths that link together neighborhoods,parks, open spaces, major urban activity centers, and regional recreational opportunities utilizing both public property and easements on private property. The Plan conforms to Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Goals 8.1 and 8.2, as there are projects in the Plan to develop plazas,parks,greenways, and public restrooms in the Area. There are also plans for the development of a trail system along Red Rock Creek parallel to and south of 99W. Economy Goal 9.1: Develop and maintain a strong, diversified, and sustainable local economy. Policies: S. The City shall promote well-designed and efficient development and redevelopment of vacant and underutilized industrial and commercial lands. Goal 9.2:Make Tigard a center and incubator for innovative businesses, including those that focus on environmental sustainability. 1. The City shall institute appropriate land use regulations to accommodate a contemporary mix of economic activities. Goal 9.3:Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business. Policies: 1. The City shall focus a significant portion of future employment growth and high-density housing development in its Metro-designated Town Center(Downtown);Regional Center (Washington Square); High Capacity Transit Corridor (Hwy 99W); and the Tigard Triangle. 3. The City shall commit to improving and maintaining the quality of community life (public safety, education, transportation, community design, housing,parks and recreation, etc.) to promote a vibrant and sustainable economy. The Plan conforms to Economy Goals 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3, as there are projects in the Plan to provide financial and technical assistance to new and existing businesses and housing developments to help with the development of vacant and underutilized lands in the Area. Development assistance will include,but is not limited to, façade improvement grants/loans, streetscape improvements,technical assistance, site assembly, site clean-up/preparation, site acquisition, and/or partnerships that facilitate housing and mixed-use developments. The Plan was developed with the guidance of a Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of partners from various organizations including the Tigard Chamber of Commerce. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 21 Housing Goal 10.1: Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. Policies: 1. The City shall adopt and maintain land use policies, codes, and standards that provide opportunities to develop a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences, and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. 3. The City shall support housing affordability, special-needs housing, ownership opportunities, and housing rehabilitation through programs administered by the state, Washington County, nonprofit agencies, and Metro. 5. The City shall provide for high and medium density housing in the areas such as town centers (Downtown), regional centers (Washington Square), and along transit corridors where employment opportunities, commercial services, transit, and other public services necessary to support higher population densities are either present or planned for in the future. Goal 10.2:Maintain a high level of residential livability. 1. The City shall adopt measures to protect and enhance the quality and integrity of its residential neighborhoods. 2. The City shall provide multi-modal transportation access from residential neighborhoods transit stops, commercial services, employment, and other activity centers. 5. The City shall encourage housing that supports sustainable development patterns by promoting the efficient use of land, conservation of natural resources, easy access to public transit and other efficient modes of transportation, easy access to services and parks, resource efficient design and construction, and the use of renewable energy resources. The Plan conforms to Housing Goals 10.1 and 10.2, as there are projects in the Plan to facilitate workforce and affordable housing and transit-oriented and mixed-use development. The Plan was developed with the guidance of a Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of partners from various organizations including Community Partners for Affordable Housing and REACH Community Development. Transportation Goal 12.1:Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livability of the community. 1. The City shall plan for a transportation system that meets current community needs and anticipated growth and development. 2. The City shall prioritize transportation projects according to community benefit, such as safety,performance, and accessibility, as well as the associated costs and impacts. 3. The City shall maintain and enhance transportation functionality by emphasizing multi- modal travel options for all types of land uses. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 22 4. The City shall promote land uses in transportation investments that promote balanced transportation options. 5. The City shall develop plans for major transportation corridors and provide appropriate land uses in and adjacent to those corridors. 6. The City shall support land use patterns that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and preserve the function of the transportation system. 9. The City shall coordinate with private and public developers to provide access via a safe, efficient, and balanced transportation system. 10. The City shall require all development to meet the adopted transportation standards or provide appropriate mitigations. Goal 12.2: Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of goods. 2. The City shall manage the transportation system to support desired economic development activities. 3. The City shall design streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by improving arterial, collector, and local street connections. 4. The City shall design arterial routes, highway access, and adjacent land uses in ways that facilitate the efficient movement of people, goods and services. 6. The City shall develop and maintain an efficient arterial grid system that provides access within the City, and searched through traffic in the City. 9. The City shall require the provision of appropriate parking in balance with other transportation modes. 11. The City shall design the transportation system to provide connectivity between Metro designated centers, corridors, employment and industrial areas. Goal 12.3:Provide an accessible, multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. 3. The City shall design and construct transportation facilities to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 4. The City shall support and prioritize bicycle,pedestrian, and transit improvements for transportation disadvantaged populations who may be dependent on travel modes other than private automobile. 5. The City shall develop and maintain neighborhood and local connections to provide efficient circulation in and out of the neighborhoods. 6. The City shall require development adjacent to transit routes to provide direct pedestrian accessibility. 7. The City shall develop and implement public street standards that recognize the multi- purpose nature of the street right-of-way. 8. The City shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 23 9. The City shall require sidewalks to be constructed in conjunction with private development and consistent with adopted plans. 10. The City shall require and/or facilitate the construction of off-street trails to develop pedestrian and bicycle connections that cannot be provided by a street. 11. The City shall require appropriate access to bicycle and pedestrian facilities for all schools,parks,public facilities, and commercial areas. Goal 12.4:Maintain and improve transportation system safety. 1. The City shall consider the intended uses of street during the design to promote safety, efficiency, and multi-modal needs. 2. The City shall ordinate with appropriate agencies to provide safe, secure, connected, and desirable pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit facilities. 3. The City shall require new development to provide safe access for all modes to and from a publicly dedicated street. 5. The City shall prioritize intersection improvements to address safety deficiencies. 9. The City shall require new transportation facilities to meet adopted lighting standards. Goal 12.6:Fund an equitable, balanced, and sustainable transportation system that promotes the well-being of the community. 2. The City shall seek to invest in capital projects that leverage other infrastructure investments. 3. The City shall seek opportunities for transportation investments that support transportation goals of efficiency, multi-modal access, and safety. The Plan conforms to Transportation Goals 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, and 12.4, as there are projects in the Plan to improve the transportation system for all modes of travel and to create better access to, from, and within the Area. The specific projects include modifying existing streets, constructing new streets,providing better pedestrian and bicycle access, intersection improvements, overpass connections,parking solutions for vehicles and bicycles, and trail development along Red Rock Creek. The Plan was developed with the guidance of a Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of partners from various agencies including Metro, TriMet, Washington County, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. B. Tigard Community Development Code The land uses in the Area will conform to the zoning designations in the community development code, including maximum densities and building requirements, and are incorporated by reference herein. The following zoning districts are present in the Area. C-G: General commercial district. The C-G zoning district applies to roughly half of the land in the Area. This zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail,office and civic uses with a citywide and regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences that are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 24 storage,mini-warehouses, utilities,heliports,medical centers,major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. MUE: Mixed-use employment. The MUE zoning district applies to roughly half of the land in the Area and is the city's only regional mixed-use employment district. This zoning district permits a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services,business/professional offices, civic uses and housing;the latter includes multi-family housing at a maximum density of 25 units/acre, equivalent to the R-25 zoning district. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to community recreation facilities,medical centers, schools,utilities and transit-related park-and-ride lots, are permitted conditionally. Although it is recognized that the automobile will accommodate the vast majority of trips to and within the Triangle, it is still important to: (1) support alternative modes of transportation to the greatest extent possible, and (2) encourage a mix of uses to facilitate intra-district pedestrian and transit trips even for those who drive. R-12: Medium-density residential district. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. C-P: Professional/administrative commercial district. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail,personal services, and restaurants in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Residential uses at a minimum density of 32 units/net acre, i.e., equivalent to the R-40 zoning district,are permitted in conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports, medical centers,religious institutions and utilities are permitted conditionally. Development in the C-P zoning district is intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. C. Tigard Transportation System Plan Goal 1:Land use and transportation coordination—develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livability of the community. The city shall plan for a transportation system that meets current community needs and anticipated growth and development. Goal 2: Transportation efficiency—develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Goal 3:Multi-modal transportation system—provide an accessible, multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. Goal 4:Safe transportation system—maintain and improve transportation system safety. Goal 5:Inter-agency coordination—coordinate planning, development, operation and maintenance of the transportation system with appropriate agencies. Goal 6: Transportation funding—fund and equitable, balanced and sustainable transportation system that promotes the well-being of the community. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 25 In addition to the above applicable goals,the Tigard Triangle is identified as one of three special areas within the city with significant growth opportunities and transportation challenges. The Tigard Triangle is a priority opportunity for community development and economic activity. The triangle has long been a retail and commercial hub within the city. Today, the triangle is zoned for commercial and mixed-use development and is identified as an area of significant future growth in housing and jobs. Although the area is bordered by three major regional roadways, in many ways those roadways function as barriers to access the triangle. Travel to and from the Tigard Triangle is funneled from Pacific Highway via 72nd Avenue, Dartmouth Street and 68th Parkway; the Highway 217/72nd Avenue interchange; the northbound 1-5 interchange with Haines Street; and the southbound 1-5 interchange with Dartmouth Street. Access to and from the Tigard Triangle area is, and will remain, a critical issue to the success of the Tigard Triangle area. The majority of employees and customers traveling to the area on city streets access the Tigard Triangle area off of Pacific Highway. There is considerable congestion on Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle and this congestion is forecast to worsen with future development and regional growth. A second issue with the Tigard Triangle relates to non-auto mobility/circulation to/from and within the area. The triangle area as a whole is generally sloping downward from Pacific Highway and 1-5 to Highway 217. The topography makes pedestrian and bicycle transportation more difficult. These conditions are worsened by incomplete bicycle and pedestrian systems within the Triangle. At the broadest level, options for improving access to the Tigard Triangle area fall into the following categories: • Provide additional intersection and roadway capacity improvements to improve traffic operations at the boundary streets. • Minimize additional roadway capacity infrastructure investment and focus on travel demand management(TDM)programs. • Provide better facilities for alternative modes (transit, bicycles,pedestrians, etc.). • Create a mix of critical additional capacity and implementing TDM programs. The Plan conforms to the Transportation System Plan goals and recommendations, as there are projects in the Plan to improve the transportation system for all modes of travel and to create better access to, from, and within the Area. The specific projects include modifying existing streets,constructing new streets,providing better pedestrian and bicycle access, intersection improvements,overpass connections,parking solutions for vehicles and bicycles, and trail development along Red Rock Creek. The Plan was developed with the guidance of a Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of partners from various agencies including Metro, TriMet, Washington County, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 26 D. Tigard Park System Master Plan Goal 1: Provide a wide variety of high quality park and open spaces for all residents, including both: 1)Developed areas with facilities for active recreation; and 2) Undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. Goal 2: Create a citywide network of interconnected on-and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Goal 3:Provide Tigard residents with a broad range of recreational, cultural and educational activities. The Plan conforms to the Park System Master Plan, as there are projects in the Plan to develop plazas,parks, greenways, and public restrooms in the Area. There are also plans for the development of a trail system along Red Rock Creek parallel to and south of 99W. Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 27 XI. APPENDIX A: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area Tigard, Oregon Area= 548 Acres A tract of land, including road rights-of-way, located in the Northeast One-Quarter,the Southeast One-Quarter, and the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South,Range 1 West and the Northwest One-Quarter,the Northeast One-Quarter, and the Southeast One-Quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 1 of the plat of"Villa Ridge No. 2", being on the Willamette Meridian,the easterly line of Washington County, in the Northeast One-Quarter of Section 31,Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD): 1. Thence along the Willamette Meridian,being the easterly line of Washington County, Southerly 8,592 feet, more or less,to its intersection with the easterly extension of the south line of Lot 2 of the plat of"Salem Freeway Subdivision"(Assessor's Map 2S 1 01 DD); 2. Thence along said easterly extension, Westerly 585 feet,more or less,to the southwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 217 (Assessor's Map 2S 1 01DD); 3. Thence along said southwesterly right-of-way line,Northwesterly 1,471 feet,more or less,to the west line of Lot 3 of the plat of"Varns Acres"(Assessor's Map 2S 1 01 DA); 4. Thence along said west line, Southerly 65 feet, more or less,to the southwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 217, also being the north line of Lot 9 of the plat of"72nd Business Center"(Assessor's Map 2S 1 01DA); 5. Thence along said southwesterly right-of-way line,Northwesterly 773 feet,more or less,to the easterly right-of-way line of SW 72nd Avenue (Assessor's Map 2S 1 01DB); 6. Thence crossing SW 72nd Avenue,Northwesterly 258 feet, more or less,to the intersection of the westerly right-of-way line of SW 72nd Avenue and the southwesterly right-of-way line of SW Hunziker Street(Assessor's Map 2S 1 01DB); 7. Thence along said southwesterly right-of-way line,Northwesterly 549 feet,more or less,to Engineers Station 'H' 453+50, 80 feet right,as shown on Washington County Survey Number 25355 (Assessor's Map 2S 1 01DB); 8. Thence Northwesterly 285 feet, more or less,to the intersection of the northeasterly right-of-way line of SW Hunziker Street and the southwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 217 (Assessor's Map 2S 1 01AC); 9. Thence along said southwesterly right-of-way line,Northwesterly 3,627 feet,more or less,to the intersection of the southeasterly right-of-way line of SW Pacific Highway and the southwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 217 (Assessor's Map 2S 1 01BB); 10. Thence crossing said SW Pacific Highway,Northwesterly 128 feet,more or less,to the intersection of the northwesterly right-of-way line of SW Pacific Highway and the southwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 217 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36CC); 11. Thence crossing said State Highway 217 along the northeasterly extension of the northwesterly right-of-way line of SW Pacific Highway,Northeasterly 505 feet,more Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 28 or less,to the intersection of the northwesterly right-of-way line of SW Pacific Highway and the northeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway 217 (Assessor's Map 1 S 1 36CC); 12. Thence along said northeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway 217, Northwesterly 155 feet, more or less,to the west line of Document Number 2016- 13886 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36CC); 13. Thence along said west line,Northwesterly 727 feet,more or less,to the southerly right-of-way line of SW Pfaffle Street(Assessor's Map 15 1 36CC); 14. Thence along said southerly right-of-way line, Easterly 1,609 feet, more or less,to the southerly extension of the east line of Document Number 2016-18082 (Assessor's Map 1 S 1 36CA); 15. Thence along said southerly extension and the east line thereof,Northerly 1,113 feet, more or less,to the south line of the plat of"Tigard Woods, A Condominium Community"(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36CA); 16. Thence along said south line, Easterly 296 feet,more or less,to the west line of the plat of"White Oak Village"(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36CA); 17. Thence along said west line, Southerly 198 feet, more or less,to the north line of Tract 'A' of said plat(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36CA); 18. Thence along said north line, Easterly 4 feet,more or less,to the northeast corner thereof(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36CA); 19. Thence along the east line of said Tract 'A', Southeasterly 304 feet,more or less,to the northwest corner of Lot 26 of said plat(Assessor's Map 1 S 1 36CA); 20. Thence along the west line of said Lot 26, Southerly 69 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner thereof(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36CA); 21. Thence along the south line of said Lot 26 and the south line of Lot 27, Easterly 58 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of said Lot 27 and the west line of Document Number 2001-29328 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36DB); 22. Thence along the west line of said Deed, Southerly 65 feet, more or less,to the south line of said Deed (Assessor's Map 15 1 36DB); 23. Thence along said south line, Easterly 160 feet,more or less,to the west line of Document Number 2000-00576 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36DB); 24. Thence along said west line and the west line of Document Number 2007-115624, Northerly 319 feet, more or less,to the south line of Partition Plat Number 2009-027 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36DB); 25. Thence along said south line,Easterly 192 feet,more or less,to the southeast corner thereof(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36DB); 26. Thence along the east line of said plat,Northerly 100 feet,more or less,to the south line of Document Number 2000-14791 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36DB); 27. Thence along said south line,Easterly 21 feet, more or less,to the west line of Document Number 2001-49756(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36DB); 28. Thence along said west line,Northerly 451 feet,more or less,to the south line of the plat of"Metzger Acre Tracts" (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AC); 29. Thence along said south line,Easterly 34 feet, more or less,to the west line of Document Number 2001-49756(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AC); 30. Thence along said west line,Northerly 126 feet, more or less,to the southerly rightof- way line of SW Spruce Street(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AC); Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 29 31. Thence along said southerly right-of-way line and the easterly extension thereof, Easterly 769 feet,more or less,to the easterly right-of-way line of SW 71st Avenue (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 32. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line,Northerly 58 feet,more or less,to the north line of Document Number 2016-75996 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 33. Thence along said north line, Easterly 380 feet,more or less,to the northwest corner of Document Number 2016-64828 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 34. Thence along the north line of said Deed and the northeasterly extension thereof, Northeasterly 258 feet, more or less,to the easterly right-of-way line of SW 69th Avenue (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 35. Thence along said easterly right-of-way line,Northerly 189 feet,more or less,to the south line of Document Number 2005-78796, being a line parallel to and 88 feet southerly of the north line of Lot 1, Block 1 of the plat of"Villa Ridge"(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 36. Thence along said parallel line,Easterly 190 feet, more or less, to the west line of Document Number 2008-19233 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 37. Thence along said west line,Northerly 88 feet,more or less,to the northwest corner thereof(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 38. Thence along the north line of said Deed and the north line of Document Number 2008-74471,Northeasterly 416 feet, more or less,to the west line of Document Number 85-51861 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 39. Thence along said west line, Southerly 110 feet,more or less,to the southwest corner of said Deed(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 40. Thence along the south line of said Deed and the south line of Deed Book 794,Page 602,Northeasterly 179 feet, more or less,to the west line of Document Number 93- 07010 (Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 41. Thence along said west line,Northerly 249 feet, more or less, to the south line of the plat of"Villa Ridge No. 2"(Assessor's Map 1S 1 36AD); 42. Thence along said south line,Northeasterly 194 feet, more or less,to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract of land contains 548 acres,more or less. 10/17/2016 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON JANUARY 12, 2016 MICHAEL S. KAUNA 89558PLS RENEWS: 6/30/17 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 30 SHEET 1 OF 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON POINT OF BEGINNING:Ei1i:,st= SE CORNER LOT 1,.?r 'a're ; �-.rtPLAT OF 'VILLA RIDGE NO. 2�■ r a ..1] t1 riiluin � milUI . ourame am nap r.rar■■��/ / a.= SII = 2�I1=0 4 ' _zi_ AA 1•ri : n1 _,0'i- St I ,4:1. Al laii LI leollii ID=II i II modirii i1 ',W�•►,t' Rig g ~ i:y -Iii _>MLLA�IETTE al ..■/®® ■•: �, !'Jlll®®aRt-N ERIDIAN 1► ', clllh r■3 giV11111110TOTAL AREA =_ „SII)r," 548 ARES± - u�4S :►:. L LJ� .: ..`io 1111,IIIIIIEl w:..:: 1.7c i 5 IF. .i. i Itl.„az ant No am:Li ',�� w ".N as la . ..•. j lin � 'IILI ri:2 1. Mil .NOT TO Avias...... Z '' SCALE TeMisilitik‘ :II:11 lin P ruITlrTr ■ Mil �Numm.L •so Milne sok . •rrI.-or a Ns NINON of -II. irogoirh spa% ...a: 10/17/2016 1110I"r- REGISTERED l PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR �� \ /---... . f r4 _ TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT -�"`" � URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGON PREPARED FOR AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC ORMN: MSK JANUARY 12, 20i8 CITY OF TIGARD ALSCa+Ko: NSW' MICHAEL S. KALINA 12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100 AKs : 69ssgp� /13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD, OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 aks-eng.com 5570 DMS 5570 COT UR-01 101 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 3 I SHEET 2 OF 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON POINT OF BEGINNING SE CORNER LOT 1, Rai I PLAT LLA RIDGE NO. Y Q N0. 2. 42-NORTHcASTERLY 19L't LOT 1 Z I LOT 11 LOT 6 F- (0 iii DN. 93-81775 > *_ o-- Q 1 415 ^g 77 ., p 37 NORTHERLY 88'± 10,5 . SW PINE STNS 1 "Str 10( U) I DOC 1 N0. 1 DN. SCO 0'• N �! 005-78796 HOZ 2008- DN. 19233 2008- P z N -35-NORTHERLY_ BL�I1 6 EASTERLY 74471 C N\GN� V 8 g 1 189 t "VILLA \F\ ygv r laa ' gVd P PG 14-NE g 2`�} WILLAMETTE--,, o. MERIDIAN 20<6� I T2s ii 1 71 SEE SHEET 03 10/17/2016 SCALE 1" = 200 FEET REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL iiiniNi III iii LAND SURVEYOR 200 0 80120160200 be..-e- _a--- TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGON PREPARED FOR AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, 11C onti: MSK JANUARY 12, 2016 CITY OF TIGARD 12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100 MICHAEL S. IWJNAoiKO: NSW 89558PL5 13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 NCS RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD, OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 oks-eng.comA5570 DMC:5570 COT UR-02 102 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 32 SHEET 3 OF 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SEE SHEET 02 - - - - - - 1Env rt�a ia I. °fi . I1 ��P MR ) F 51iV 6 Ei§zZ uiu Ln' I ■�� a (1 � cq mal cc SCALE 1" = 1000 FEET a u.w �� i■■Z — C ■ ■ == =i 1000 0 400 8008001000 -= i 13rT IIl 1 rr1 10/17/2016 NMI. MINK SEE SHEET 04 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR rl... 1— TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGON EPARm FQR AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLCAS� +: MSK uicwEL S. KAUNA niJANUARY 12, 2018 CITY OF p 12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100 Dilor: NSW MICHAEL 89558PLS 13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 AKS JOB: RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD, OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 aks—eng.cam 5570 DMC 5570 COT UR-03 I D3 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 33 SHEET 4 tT 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SEE SHEET 05 SEE SHEET 03 lk 4-SOUTHERLY 65'± LOT 9 N W Q 1- URNS RNS 1- co CC ACRES' 17 A LLI N S!, -MI LT 3 �., Z 03 `-<y s�t S c 6 a SCALE 1" = 200 FEET M MI IIII MI MI 200 0 60 120100200 LOT 2 10/17/2016 'SALEM FREEWAY r REGISTERED _ SUBDINSIOtt PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LOT 3 2-WESTERLY 585'± ./61-.rr.....e,L,-- TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGON PREPARED FOR MS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC 1A10 DRIN: MSKJANUARY12, 2016 ¶ 12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100 NS9VMICHAEL S. KAUNA d1�dl558PLS 13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 AKS JOB: RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD, OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 aks-eng.com5570 OK.5570 COT OR-04 104 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 34 SHEET 5 7 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SEE SHEET 06 SCALE 1" = 200 FEET - - - - \____ I 8—NORTHWESTERLY _MI El 285'± 200 0 80 120180200 11' STA 453+50, 80' RIGHT (AS SHOWN ON SN 25355) til G. 4,,, l\ F,p );-% \ `` . s.), DOC. NO. ,,d 2006-119310 ' `,v. \ �` _—1 1 1 1 fig(dVG HILLS' LOT 1 5—NORTHWESTERLY SW VARNS ST 773'± 6—NORTHWESTERLY W 258'± Q LOT 12 LOT 11 0 \ Z SW YARNS ST n 72ND�9N SS TER' I 3—NORTHWESTERLY 10/17/2016 (!1 4—SOUTHERLY 65'±- 1,471 I I LOT 9 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR \ V '± SEE SHEET 04 ti+.."--,/ TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGON PREPARED FOR AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC AOOM: YSKJANUARY t2, 2018 CITY012965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100ReyMICHAEL S. KAUNAOF 89558PLS ,13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 Ucs RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD, OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 oks—eng.com 5570 ow 5570 COT UR-65 105 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 35 SHEET 6 OF 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SEE SHEET 07 SCALE 1" = 200 FEET IN I. 200 0 80 120 180 200 `9• D9y SW yvN2/k 97-26693 'IT Sr 8—NORTHWESTERLY 1111 285'± 10/17/2016 'H' STA 453+50, 80' RIGHT REGISTERED (AS SHOWN ON SN 25355) PROFESSIONAL 7—NORTHWESTERLY LAND SURVEYOR 549'± SEE SHEET 05 TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGON PREPARm FOR AKS ENGINEERING do FORESTRY, LLC DRNN: USK JANUARY 12. 2018 CITY OF 11GARD 12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100 MICHAEL S. KALINAp00): � 69558PLS 13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 AKS RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD, OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 oks—eng.com 5570 CIT 5570 COT IR-06 106 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 36 SHEET 70119 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON � iiragd pliF MI6 U E -) SW PFAFFLE ST ' SHEETT 0- — .i ,,. ail 14—EASTERLY 1,609't li 15I NORTHERLY li j ♦ 1,113't r>'I-- � -1141141 DOC. NO. ,,�.0 i 81-34071 l�y b , �NO \,03. ;'s. Q PG\ G A SCALE 1" = 500 FEET MI ■ • 500 0 200 900 400 500 ti4. -m� Q 9, �� 417ate, s inn i. L. 10/17/2016 I� ,•••H REGISTERED •••�,� ' PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR SEE SHEET 06 J`^^b,+��-�a ,4__ TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT � URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGON PREPARED FOR AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC AS( DRIM: MSKUNUARY t2, 2otaCITY OF TIDD12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100MICHAELS KAUNA GilNSW89558PLS "13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 AKS loIRENEWS: 6/30/17 PGARO. OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 oks-eng.com5570 DWG.5570 c01 UR-07 107 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 37 SHEET 8 Cr 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS—OF—WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON /y'-+},- b SEE SHEET 09 E c -/-- .- "WARD WOODS A ! u' /, p cavoomNiuv=muffin'. ri "I' 11�y-y�-�-, _ rail DUTO R � IIIII_ dmti 4 _K 16-EASTERLY ''- _____ _ z zd r4.3 296'± TR. DOCDOc Q i - ,.: 2000-14791 >" iii 'MID PP Na — 18-EASTERLY U_ >- 2009-027 27,EASTERLY 4't � � 3 4. \21± — 19-5'EASER Y uj-, d i NC >- i0O'±26- ,ERLY . Immo 72 25-EASTERLY DOC. NO. v 192'± . H i 1:2 81-34071 TR .A. 8 - r, 2? 20-SOUTHERLY it - c4 g a g I �, 69'± CCC.INO. DCC. 0 8 X 21-EASTERLY 2000- 58+± EASTERLY 00576 . 22-SOUTHERLY 160'1 65'± y G`s P DOC. NO. 0 -- 81-34071 �' i 14-EASTERLY�609"t = 10/17/2016 0 I r-----'� SCALE 1" 200 FEET REGISTERED Mi_ PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR W 200 0 80120180200 111 i .m..:1,...-e_l_4,-- TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT URBAN RENEWAL AREA B OREGONJANUAPREPARED FOR AKS ENGINEERING & FORESTRY, LLC I DM: MISE( MICHAELY 12, 2016 CITY OF TIGARD 12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100 Oilm: NSW YN}iAEL S. KALINA 89 58PLS 13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, 97062 Acs J08. RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD. OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 aks-eng.com 5570 Dm 5570 COT UR-08 108 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 38 MEET 9 OF 9 MAP OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA A TRACT OF LAND, INCLUDING ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4, THE SE 1/4, AND THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 36, T1 S, R1W, AND THE NW 1/4, THE NE 1/4, AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 1 1 I I I I I Il I 1i I W W > > Q a a - Cl) N r: 34-NORTHEASTELRY ' 258'1 N DOC. NO. CO DOC. N0. I o 2001-49756 0OC. NO. 96-25810 IE 2012-64255 I .30-N'ERLY SW SPRUCE ST 33-EASTERLY 380'1 t42.1 •'t 31-EASTERLY 769'± "f"-32-NORTHERLY 58'± �2 $ I SOUTH UNE OF DOC. NO. IE7ZGER ACRE TRACTS' 2016-75996 29-EASTERLY 34'± 44' DOC. NO. G4 97-085245co �QP' i 5 N SEE SHEET 08 10/17/2016 SCALE 1" = 200 FEET PROFESSIONAL iMi•■• LAND SURVEYOR 200 0 80 120 180 200 /-t.rh TIGARD TRIANGLE EXHIBIT URBAN RENEWAL AREA B JANUARY 12,REGON2018 1. MICHAEL S. KAUNA PREPARED FOR AKS ENGINEERING lc FORESTRY, LLC ►+ MSKCITY Twp 12965 SW HERMAN RD, STE 100 AM CHKD: NSW 89sp� "13125 SW HALL BLVD TUALATIN, OR 97062 AKS RENEWS: 6/30/17 TIGARD, OR 97223 P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 aks-eng.com 5570 DK 5579 COT UR-09 109 Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan 39 EXHIBIT B Report Accompanying the Urban Renewal Plan Adopted by the City of Tigard December 13, 2016 Ordinance No. 16 - Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area Consultant Team Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC Elaine Howard Scott Vanden Bos Tiberius Solutions LLC Nick Popenuk Rob Wyman ECONorthwest Kate Macfarlane TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL,AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES 3 III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN 21 IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA 21 V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS 25 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT 28 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED 33 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN 38 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 40 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA 44 XI. RELOCATION REPORT 44 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area I. INTRODUCTION The Report on the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan(Report)contains background information and project details that pertain to the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan(Plan). The Report is not a legal part of the Plan,but is intended to provide public information and support the findings made by the City Council as part of the approval of the Plan. The Report provides the analysis required to meet the standards of ORS 457.085(3), including financial feasibility. The format of the Report is based on this statute. The Report documents the existing conditions in the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area(Area), shown on Figure 1, as they relate to the proposed projects in the Plan. The Report provides guidance on how the urban renewal plan might be implemented. As the Tigard City Center Development Agency(Agency)reviews revenues and potential projects each year, it has the authority to make adjustments to the implementation assumptions in this Report. The Agency may allocate budgets differently, adjust the timing of the projects, decide to incur debt at different timeframes than projected in this Report, and make other changes as allowed in the amendments section of the Plan. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 1 Figure 1 —Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Area Boundary Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area .•l ■ di r �■■■■■■!�Qadh`Hv+Y • S Hai . l2' t • il ■ • _A- ---1 1 \,:/,1.'' '''''4 )\.-,,---------)__- - \ a Hil4-1(' .7--.1 • ... (( trj( f ull1111P9 ' rT2IFFil • �. ( _ J- 1 t 11�1 x-7-1 In r- • SW Dartmouth St • • I • ; : ,l 1 1 t_]L..J H l' J• ,. ilivi .,:d kj 1 1 : ' L_ -L 11 Hill kl • Pnr 1 f - \\ rrfft1! • LineT' _i� • J _ rj . rl spy H 4hziker Rd • • •i <s •• 7, ■■.• _ • o, ti3O � : �J • • a : / 'is • •"'• Tigard Triangle URA •�43, • . .1) 0 500 1,000 feet a I I I 1,9,g4, e Source:ECONorthwest Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 2 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES This section of the Report describes existing conditions within the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area and documents the occurrence of"blighted areas," as defined by ORS 457.010(1). A. Physical Conditions 1. Land Use The Area measures 547.9 total acres in size, encompassing 383.04 acres included in 327 individual parcels, and an additional 164.86 acres in public rights-of-way. An analysis of FYE 2016 property classification data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation database was used to determine the land use designation of parcels in the Area. By acreage, commercial accounts for the largest land use within the area(83%). This is followed by vacant(9%), and exempt(6%). The total land uses in the Area, by acreage and number of parcels, are shown in Table 1. Table 1 —Existing Land Uses in Area Land Use Parcels Acres % Total Acres Commercial 263 321.15 83.84% Vacant 41 35.08 9.16% Exem.t 18 21.82 5.70% Multi-Famil Residential 5 4.99 1.30% Total 327 383.04 100% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 3 2. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations The zoning and comprehensive plan designations in the Area are the same. As illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 2,the majority(52%)of the Area by acreage is zoned and designated in the comprehensive plan as General Commercial. The second most prevalent zoning and comprehensive plan designation is Mixed-Use Employment, representing 45%of the Area. There are two lots that are split zoned/designated. The data uses the most prevalent category. Table 2—Existing Zoning/Comprehensive Plan Designations in Area Zoning/Comprehensive l'laul parcels Acres % Total Designation Acres General Commercial 113 200.98 52.47% Mixed Use Em.to ent 204 173.54 45.31% Medium Densit Residential 1 5.77 1.51% Professional Commercial 9 2.75 0.72% Total 327 383.04 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 4 Figure 2 —Area Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations \sF 1 aR _ / ,< aaaaa!•;a .r"�' • '? •▪ U "ll'r 1� t . _.•e y3 • Irip1, • :.,"di. • j �5, ,i i"if, ' 7- - ' ....,,,,, ‘• —.N N tizs„, � . , _.„...col-,.. t afro moo ,,.a R NIM ]( `�y( � .11 at rA i �N44y . ` e. . » ,.Y mouth.St ■ A�1 1 ca .i4 Fit. lk ►, }, Siviy ®r Rd 4` ilk h„ Zoning w`/ \ // ► ' . General Commercial ittl-4k'N't\ j� Professional Commercial �a� \� Mixed Use Employment \ Medium Density Residential(R-12) .. • � III Light Industrial 92- t �~r �,,,ti •• ■ Tigard Triangle URA 1. •a•a• co 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet I I I I Source:ECONorthwest with data from the City of Tigard and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 5 B. Infrastructure This section identifies the existing conditions in the Area to assist in establishing blight. There are projects listed in several City of Tigard infrastructure master plans and the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan that relate to these existing conditions. This does not mean that all of these projects are included in the Plan.The specific projects that are included in the Plan are listed in Sections IV and V of this Report. 1. Transportation The Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP) details the transportation needs within the Area. Streets and Intersections There are significant transportation needs within the Area: "The Tigard Triangle is a priority opportunity for community development and economic activity. The triangle has long been a retail and commercial hub within the city. Today,the triangle is zoned for commercial and mixed-use development and is identified as an area of significant future growth in housing and jobs. Although the area is bordered by three major regional roadways, in many ways those roadways function as barriers to access the triangle. Travel to and from the Tigard Triangle is funneled from Pacific Highway via 72nd Avenue, Dartmouth Street and 68th Parkway;the Highway 217/72nd Avenue interchange;the northbound 1-5 interchange with Haines Street; and the southbound 1-5 interchange with Dartmouth Street. Access to and from the Tigard Triangle area is, and will remain, a critical issue to the success of the Tigard Triangle area. The majority of employees and customers traveling to the area on city streets access the Tigard Triangle area off of Pacific Highway.There is considerable congestion on Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle and this congestion is forecast to worsen with future development and regional growth. A second issue with the Tigard Triangle relates to non-auto mobility/circulation to/from and within the area. The triangle area as a whole is generally sloping downward from Pacific Highway and 1-5 to Highway 217. The topography makes pedestrian and bicycle transportation more difficult. These conditions are worsened by incomplete bicycle and pedestrian systems within the Triangle. At the broadest level, options for improving access to the Tigard Triangle area fall into the following categories: • Provide additional intersection and roadway capacity improvements to improve traffic operations at the boundary streets. • Minimize additional roadway capacity infrastructure investment and focus on travel demand management(TDM)programs. • Provide better facilities for alternative modes(transit,bicycles,pedestrians,etc.). • Create a mix of critical additional capacity and implementing TDM programs."1 ' Tigard 2035 Transportation System Plan,November 23, 1010,p.5.73 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 6 Infrastructure Investments As identified in the Tigard TSP: "Within the Triangle,the improvement projects include several capacity enhancements to existing roadways, extension of Atlanta Street to connect 68th Avenue and Dartmouth, and a new Highway 217 overcrossing connecting Hunziker Street to Hampton Street. The Atlanta Street extension and Hunziker Street overcrossing would provide needed additional circulation options for auto and non-auto modes of transportation within the Tigard Triangle. In addition,the Hunziker Street overcrossing would provide an additional access to the Tigard Triangle area from the south and west. The plan also includes widening 72nd Avenue (arterial)and Dartmouth Street(collector)to five lanes. Without careful design of both facilities,these could end up functioning as a surrogate for I-5 travel and could become significant pedestrian and bicycle barriers within the Tigard Triangle. An initial step toward realizing these projects is a corridor study to review street cross sections and potential parallel routes."2 Specific project considerations from the TSP for the Area are listed in Table 3 on the following page. z Tigard 2035 Transportation System Plan,November 23, 1010,p.5.74 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 7 Table 3—Transportation Project Needs as Identified in the Tigard TSP Name Description Time Cost Frame Estimate OR 217/72nd Avenue Complete interchange reconstruction with Near-term $19,500,000 Interchange improvements additional ramps and overcrossings Atlanta Street extension Extend Atlanta Street west to Dartmouth Street Mid-term $3,300,000 68th Avenue Widen to 2/3 lanes between Dartmouth Mid-term $10,000,000 Street/I-5 Ramps and south end 72nd Avenue widening: Widen to 4/5 lanes Mid-term $8,000,000 ORE 99W to Dartmouth 72nd Avenue widening: Widen to 4/5 lanes,including bridge Mid-term $7,000,000 Dartmouth to Hunziker Complete 4/5-lane section from Costco to Dartmouth Street widening 72nd Avenue(small section missing in Near-term $320,000 eastbound direction only) Dartmouth Street widenin Widen to 4 lanes plus turn lanes and sidewalks Near-term $3,000,000 g between 72nd Avenue and 1-5(68th Avenue) 68th/Atlanta/Haines Traffic signal and turn lanes where necessary Near-term $500,000 68th Ave/Dartmouth Street Install traffic signal and turn lanes where Near-term $500,000 necessary 72nd Ave/Dartmouth Street Traffic signal and intersection widening Near-term $1,100,000 Intersection improvements such as dual Pacific Hwy/I-5 SB northbound through lanes on pacific highway Near-term $5,000,000 and dual lanes for I-5 ramps to reduce confusion,congestion and related accidents Pacific Hwy/68th Ave Intersection improvements such as added turn Near-term $1,000,000 lanes,protected left-turns at 68th Pacific Hwy/72nd Ave Intersection improvements such as added turn Near-term $2,000,000 lanes,a southbound right turn pocket Pacific Hwy/Dartmouth St Intersection improvements such as turn lanes Near-term $6,000,000 and auxiliary lanes Source:City of Tigard Transportation System Plan Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 8 2. Water Water is provided by the Tualatin Valley Water District(TVWD). The TVWD Capital Improvement Plan for the adopted 2015-17 budget lists one specific project in the Tigard Triangle Area.3 In general, improvements, such as replacement of aging infrastructure, are anticipated throughout the entire TVWD service area. The one specific project in the Area is an upgrade to the Metzger North-South Transmission Line. TVWD needs to make various fire flow improvements based on their recent 2014 Master Plan. The project will provide a resiliency function to Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue facilities and a key commercial area. It is estimated to include the installation of 6,000 feet of 18"transmission line. The area being served, which includes the Area and properties north of the Area in Metzger, expects further growth and development in future years.4 3. Stormwater The city maintains the stormwater system in the Area. There are two concentrations of stormwater mains with the Area, including one in the vicinity of SW Dartmouth Street/SW Clinton Street/SW 68th Avenue/SW 69th Avenue and another at the southern corner of the Area. Although there are no identified improvement projects for the Area in capital improvement plans, future development will need to consider stormwater improvements. The majority of stormwater runoff from the Area drains into Red Rock Creek. This runoff scours the creek bed and undermines the sanitary sewer line located in the stream corridor. More information concerning the blighting conditions concerning stormwater are detailed in a memo from the City Engineer as follows: "The city does not currently have a Stormwater Master Plan but is in the process of developing one, scheduled for completion summer of 2017. Initial work on the plan has included an identification of known issues,which are shown on the attached maps, Exhibits B and C respectively. [See Figures 3 and 4.] Issues are grouped into one of four categories, namely water quality, flooding, erosion, and maintainability. As the two maps show, issues in the Tigard Triangle are centered around Red Rock Creek,which serves as the main stormwater conveyance corridor for the area. In addition to the known issues discussed above,the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)recently issued a new National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) permit to Clean Water Services for storm water and sanitary sewer/treatment systems. The City of Tigard is a co-implementer of these permit requirements within city limits. As a result of the new permit, the city expects that the Stormwater Master Plan will need to include identification of capital projects and design standards that provide additional water quantity management throughout areas of the city, including the Triangle. The city currently plans to consider a regional approach to stormwater management in this area, similar to the approach used in River Terrace, which will require the acquisition of land or easements and construction of detention ponds and conveyance infrastructure. For the purposes of this 3 Tualatin Water District CIP Overview 2015-17 Budget,Section 17 4 Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015-17,pg. 17-35 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 9 memo,the city will assume that at least three regional detention ponds will be needed in the Triangle area."5 5 Memo Re:Existing Conditions in Tigard Triangle: Sewer and Stormwater,August 8,2016 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 10 Figure 3 —Stormwater Issues r. Stormwatcr Known Issues - Exhibit B I. !r tam t '''"" am.^ti IT a • ■ t. �� _1.... :: • 2 3 s m ®.w •r.. of .. i _i._.— i i�_ a N. a. Ili S� ama s= rr t, ' '4 •!+9 •• Pia:we:q®� .A � •a'414'. , i / �'. ....... a Q� �...� i 1t f i a• ' g .SLa �9 s.S��41 ."�•��tiin .r. 6 7 <, a w'sn 1*a t.,... "%,;‘,:i .a o a ar a e• •ga• 1107 V r a ryr• M+ : i,011 : : a a..veL weaaa est 2.alr.§ 11 12 _ le 78 i a 0 a ea f N.y i .< we•7■oWa ra W.0 .0.9a 36 a as o ao,e i .•i maw. fns unusual;.. .. ••• r._ ��f� ■ Ti sm. el.al■n•'r■r■'i•■1000 ••• i ._•' / STORNIWCTER ■ y� ! , ilia .. aen /if © ' , • e „I 1 • V:1 A . -_{ •i�-... --:,-, —__ •......... eta - '�` . N \\...\\2,..,_.,1 � I J 5 t 1 Legend ■n■11.111 R,•,•P Tigard City Boundary Stormwator Outfall •i, Stormwater Swill* 0 Water Quality Issue Point • Flooding Issue Point • Erosion Issue Point 0 Maintainability Issue Point 11••••• • •Study Area * Stormwater Vault MN Stormwater Detention Pipe Water Quality Issue Area see.. Flooding Issue Line m••••• Erosion Issue Line Maintalrmbiley Issue Line Trails II..4 Stormwater Culvert saes. Stormwater Water Quality Pipe Flooding Issue Area Erosion Issue Area Maintainability Issue Area w1•---Streams Stormwater Main GE Stormwater Water Quality Pond Dale 7(21201635130PM Source:City of Tigard memo on conditions 8/2016,Exhibit B Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area I 1 Figure 4—Stormwater Issues Stormwater Known Issues DRAFT Exhibit C ,c• � : Locator Map e i- . :♦' si 5106 ,4inifinas a 4./aai 1 6 7 E - 510S - , t\ ‘). , \ \ MOS '°' °' V z .... ,..e-J i 11 12 *� +s,ot mos - to p...a ' µsw, �e .1 I 16 17 ! 1/11 qe I I 1 6C :... icuy - of Ti.md STORMWQTER C .---r-------;-- , ' MAETEA Pt AN aae a : If. V ' N •.q� `'d,0•`.1,:: . f ► G Legend R■,,.-IT.Tigard City Boundary Stormwater Outtall i• it+ Stormwater Swale 0 Water Quality Issue Point • Flooding Issue Point • Erosion Issue Point 0 Maintainability Issue Point • •Study Area IM Stormwater Vault a= Stormwater Detention Pipe Water Quality Issue Area Flooding Issue Line * Erosion Issue Line Maintainability Issue Line _— Trails $ Stormwater Culvert iiiisi Stormwater Water Quality Pipe Flooding Issue Area Erosion Issue Area Maintainability Issue Area +l+^- Streams --- Stormwater Main 3i.TM Stormwater Water Quality Pond Date.7/212016 3:52:43 PM Source:City of Tigard memo on conditions 8/2016,Exhibit C Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 12 4. Sanitary Sewer The city maintains the sanitary sewer system in the Area. Although there are no projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan,there is acknowledgement that there are sanitary sewer needs in the Area. These needs have been documented in a memo from the City Engineer as follows: "There are two areas in the Tigard Triangle that are not currently served by the public sewer system. These areas contain single-family residential uses on private septic systems that pre- date the area's current zoning. Redevelopment of these areas would likely trigger the requirement to extend the nearby sewer mains and connect to the public sewer system. The city's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan does not identify these as capital sewer projects because they are generally considered the responsibility of the property owner(s). One of the unsewered areas is around 69th Avenue north of Dartmouth, and the other area is around Elmhurst Street east of 72nd Avenue. In addition to these unsewered areas,there is an existing sewer main that runs the length of Red Rock Creek corridor in the Tigard Triangle. This main has had two breaks in the recent past that have been caused by erosive storm water flows that have undercut the ground around the main. The city has completed emergency repairs but a permanent fix remains unfunded."6 Figures 3 and 4 on the previous pages show where the sewer line in Red Rock Creek has been compromised. Line 5201 identifies the general area of erosion, and Points 5106 and 5107 identify the location of the two breaks and subsequent repairs. Figure 5 on the following page shows the areas that are currently not served by the public sewer system. 6 Memo Re:Existing Conditions in Tigard Triangle:Sewer and Stormwater,August 8,2016 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 13 Figure 5 -Sanitary Sewer Deficiencies EXHIBIT A:Tigard 4 ATLANTA ST Triangle Sewer la -1 Y Infrastructure • F _ el Ir fir,. W. J a a' • BAYLOR'ST w w Iliw 15-"IliP.'i' il '--I - i ... 47 I! O ,TON_sir f- CI INT.N . i -Wm • :SW 11111W,' c. ' Unsewered Areas DARTMOU';TH'5T a o, _ a_, N i au 'u Q , w t W Wle a r ELIns bM.HURST ST LMHURST srof---. a Q ti -"Emu os owl-- 'fa r- i. f, i___, < .1.":=.-4.--:.:-.:=.:-„......., V 1' 'W.T ZT M I FRANKLIN-ST p. Sow ce:City of Tigard memo on conditions 8/20/6 5. Parks and Open Space The Tigard Park System Mater Plan provides the following information: The level of service standard for community and neighborhood parks is 3 acres and 1.5 acres per 1000 persons respectively in Tigard. The existing level of service in Tigard for community and neighborhood parks is 2.24 acres and .77 acres per 1000 persons respectively. Recommendations for park facilities in the Area are as follows: • Address park and recreation needs for this area in the final Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan; • Develop an on and off-street trail loop in the area with benches and other trail amenities; and • Explore the potential for a small plaza with seating for employee breaks.' 7 Tigard Park System Master Plan,p.59 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 14 The Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan augments the recommendations of the city's Park System Master Plan as follows: • Develop two neighborhood parks in the Area. Consider opportunities for incorporating regional stormwater facilities within park locations • Improve Red Rock Creek as both a natural and recreational amenity to make it a defining feature for the Triangle. A paved multi-use trail could connect this feature to the larger bicycle network. • Locate parks and plazas in the central and southern parts of the Triangle to take advantage of existing trees and vegetation.8 6. Other Utilities There is no fiber optic infrastructure in the Area. 8 Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan,p.33-34 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 15 C. Social Conditions Data from the US Census Bureau is used to identify social conditions in the Area. The geographies used by the Census Bureau to summarize data do not strictly conform to the Plan Area. As such,the Census Bureau geographies that most closely align to the Plan Area are used,which, in this case, is Block Group 1 of Census Tract 307. Within the Area,there are 14 tax lots shown as multifamily residential use. According to the US Census Bureau, American Community Survey(ACS)2010-14, the block group has 579 residents, 91%of whom are white. Table 4—Race in the Area Race 'umber Percent White Alone 529 91% Black or African American Alone 0 0% American Indian and Alaska Native Alone 0 0% Asian Alone 33 6% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone 6 1% Some Other Race Alone 6 1% Two or More races 5 1% l olal 579 I UO°„ Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 16 The largest percentage of residents in the block group is between 25-34 years of age (20%). Table 5—Age in the Area Ai4c Number Percent Under 5 Years 24 4% 5 to 9 Years 37 6% 10 to 14 Years 40 7% 15to17Years 19 3% 18 to 24 Years 51 9% 25 to 34 Years 114 20% 35 to 44 Years 87 15% 45 to 54 Years 85 15% 55 to 64 Years 55 9% 65 to 74 Years 55 9% 75 to 84 Years - 0% 85 Years and over 12 2% l oral 579 1(9) Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates In the block group, 33%of adult residents have earned a bachelor's degree or higher. Another 27%have some college education without a degree, and another 29%have graduated from high school with no college experience. Table 6—Educational Attainment in the Area Educational Attainment Number Percent Less Than High School 45 11% High School Graduate(includes equivalency) 117 29% Some college 112 27% Bachelor's degree 119 29% Master's degree 0 0% Professional school degree 0 0% Doctorate degree 15 4% I oral 408 100"0 Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 17 In the block group, 33%of commuters drove less than 10 minutes to work, and another 24% of commuters drove 10 to 19 minutes to work. Table 7—Travel Time to Work in the Area Travel Time to Work Number Percent Less than 10 minutes 111 36% 10 to 19 minutes 72 24% 20 to 29 minutes 55 18% 30 to 39 minutes 20 7% 40 to 59 minutes 15 5% 60 to 89 minutes 12 4% 90 or More minutes 5 2% Worked at home 15 5% Total 305 100°„ Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates Of the means of transportation used to travel to work,the majority, 64%, drove alone with another 21%carpooling. Table 8—Means of Transportation to Work in the Area Means of Transportation to Work Number Percent Drove Alone 194 64% Carpooled 65 21% Public transportation(Includes Taxicab) 11 4% Motorcycle 0 0% Bicycle 0 0% Walked 20 7% Other means 0 0% Worked at home 15 5% "I otal 305 I00°a Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 18 D. Economic Conditions 1. Taxable Value of Property within the Area The estimated total assessed value of the Area calculated with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation for FYE 2016, including all real,personal, manufactured, and utility properties, is estimated to be $413,798,185. 7. Building to Land Value Ratio An analysis of property values can be used to evaluate the economic condition of real estate investments in a given area. The relationship of a property's improvement value(the value of buildings and other improvements to the property)to its land value is generally an accurate indicator of the condition of real estate investments. This relationship is referred to as the "Improvement to Land Value Ratio,"or"I:L."The values used are real market values. In urban renewal areas,the I:L is often used to measure the intensity of development or the extent to which an area has achieved its short- and long-term development objectives. Table 9 below shows the improvement to land ratios for properties within the Tigard Triangle Area. The majority of parcels in the area(53%of the acreage)have I:L ratios of less than 1.0. In other words,the improvements on these properties are worth less than the land they sit on. A reasonable I:L ratio for properties in the Area is 2.0. Only 41 parcels in the Area,totaling 16.68%of the acreage have I:L ratios of 2.0 or more in FYE 2016. In summary, the Area is underdeveloped and not contributing significantly to the tax base in Tigard. Table 9-I:L Ratio of Parcels in the Area Improv ement/Land Percent of Ratio Parcels Acres Acres Exempt 18 21.82 5.70% Condos 14 2.94 0.77% No Improvement Value 47 41.09 10.73% 0.01-0.50 113 107.60 28.09% 0.51-1.00 43 55.51 14.49% 1.01-1.50 32 56.88 14.85% 1.51-2.00 19 33.28 8.69% 2.01-2.50 12 16.40 4.28% 2.51-3.00 13 30.41 7.94% 3.01-4.00 10 8.31 2.17% >4.00 6 8.79 2.29% Total 327 383.04 100.00% Source:Calculated by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 19 E. Impact on Municipal Services The fiscal impact of tax increment financing on taxing districts that levy taxes within the Area(affected taxing districts) is described in Section IX of this Report. This subsection discusses the fiscal impacts resulting from potential increases in demand for municipal services. The projects being considered for future use of urban renewal funding are transportation; public utilities;public spaces, facilities and installations; and re/development assistance and partnership projects. The use of urban renewal funding for these projects allows the city to match other funding sources to construct the improvements. It also allows the city to tap into different funding source besides the City of Tigard general fund or system development charges (SDC) funds. It is anticipated that these improvements will catalyze development on the undeveloped and underdeveloped parcels in the Area. This development would not occur were the infrastructure not upgraded. This development will require city services. However, since the property is within the city limits,the city has anticipated the need to provide services to the Area. As the development will be new construction or redevelopment, it will be up to current building code and will aid in any fire protection needs. An upgraded transportation system will also assist in fire prevention to the Area. The financial impacts from tax increment collections will be countered by providing future jobs in the Tigard Triangle Area and, in the future,placing property back on the property tax rolls with future increased tax bases for all taxing jurisdictions, including the city. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 20 III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN The reason for selecting the Area is to provide the ability to fund improvements necessary to cure blight within the Area. The Area has been the focus of significant planning efforts over the years with the goal of transforming it from an underdeveloped area with substantial infrastructure deficiencies into an active,urban,multimodal, and mixed-use district. The Plan Overview Section in the Introduction to the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan provides additional background on why urban renewal was selected for this Area. IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA The projects identified for the Area are described below, including how they relate to the existing conditions in the Area. A. Infrastructure Improvements 1. New Hwy 217 Overpass—Extend Beveland Rd south over Hwy 217 to Hunziker/Wall with car,ped, and bike facilities. Existing conditions: Currently Beveland Rd ends on the west side of 217 near Lowe's Home Improvement, and there is no overpass or ped/bike facilities. 2. New Street(74th Ave)—Extend 74th Ave south from 99W to Hermoso or Beveland. Existing conditions: Currently 74th Ave only exists between SW Spruce and SW Torchwood Streets,north of 99W; 74th Ave south of 99W does not exist. 3. New Street(Atlanta St)—Extend Atlanta St west from 69th Ave to Dartmouth or future 74th Ave. Existing conditions: Currently Atlanta St has a westward boundary of SW 69th Ave. 4. New Hwy I-5 Overpass(Beveland)—Provide ped/bike bridge across Hwy 1-5 from Beveland Rd to Southwood Dr. Existing conditions: Currently Beveland has an eastward boundary of 68th Pkwy. 5. New Hwy I-5 Overpass(Red Rock Creek)—Provide pedestrian/bike bridge across Hwy 1-5 between the Triangle and PCC Sylvania around location of Red Rock Creek. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 21 Existing conditions: Currently there is no bike/pedestrian overpass in this location. 6. Modified Intersection (Atlanta/68th)— Install traffic signal and turn lanes where needed. Existing conditions: Currently the Atlanta/68th intersection is a four way stop. 7. Modified Intersection (99W/68th)—Add protected left turn and transit improvements on 68th Pkwy at 99W. Existing conditions: Currently the left turn on 68th Pkwy yields to oncoming traffic. 8. Modified Streets (Various)—Develop comfortable, interesting, and attractive streetscapes, especially along designated pedestrian streets. Existing conditions: For the most part,the streets in the Area have limited or no pedestrian amenities and bike facilities. 9. New Trail (Red Rock Creek)—Build a trail along Red Rock Creek parallel to and south of 99W. Existing conditions: No trail currently exists. 10. New Streets(Various)—Improve connectivity, circulation, and access with new or extended local streets. Existing conditions: There is a lack of connectivity in the Area,with many parcels lacking internal local streets. Internally,the street network in the Triangle is somewhat of a grid,although some larger developments limit extending the street grid without impacts to either buildings or parking areas. The Triangle is also surrounded by highways, with primary access from OR 99W on the north side of the Triangle. The primary arterial through the Triangle is SW 72nd Avenue, linking OR 99W and OR 217. There is no direct access between downtown Tigard and the Triangle.9 11. Modified Street(72nd Ave)—Improve 72nd Ave corridor, including intersections/interchanges. Design dependent upon 72nd Ave Corridor Study recommendations. Existing conditions: 72nd Ave is the primary arterial through the Area, linking OR 99W and OR 217. 72nd Ave does not have bicycle lanes or sidewalks on the full length of the street. The street is congested And is not comfortable, interesting, or attractive to pedestrians. 9 Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan,p.6 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 22 12. Modified Street(99W)—Implement access management strategies and median projects in Hwy 99W Plan, including additional pedestrian crossing locations. Existing conditions: Highway 99W is an arterial on the northern edge of the Area. It is currently without bike lanes. The number of trips and speed of vehicles makes it difficult to develop a pedestrian oriented environment. 13. Modified Interchange(99W/Hwy 217)—Add second left turn lane on Hwy 217 northbound ramp to 99W. Existing conditions: Currently there is one left turn lane at this location. An additional turn lane would alleviate congestion at this interchange. 14. Modified Signals (Various)—Upgrade signals with adaptive signal coordination technology. Existing conditions: Currently the signals in the Area have not been upgraded with adaptive signal technology. 15. Parking Management Plan—Develop a plan and implement strategies for managing parking. Existing conditions: Currently there is no plan in place to manage or develop appropriate parking options to help facilitate the Area's transitions into a dense, pedestrian-oriented, and mixed-use district. 16. Transportation Study(Various)—Periodically evaluate the functioning of the transportation system to refine project scope and inform project prioritization. Existing conditions: Currently there is no study that provides this information. 17. Stormwater/Sewer—Develop a stormwater master plan for the Triangle and a greenway plan for Red Rock Creek that includes stormwater, sewer, and recreational needs. Existing conditions: The city does not currently have a Stormwater Master Plan but is in the process of developing one. Initial work on the plan has included an identification of known issues,which are shown on Figures 4 and 5. Issues are grouped into one of four categories,namely water quality, flooding, erosion, and maintainability.As the two maps show, issues in the Tigard Triangle are centered around Red Rock Creek,which serves as the main stormwater conveyance corridor for the area. 18. Stormwater—Construct approximately three regional stormwater facilities to meet new DEQ regulations for water quantity management. Existing conditions: The stormwater facilities in the Area are described in the physical conditions section of this Report and shown in Figures 4 and 5. They are presently deficient. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 23 19. Sewer—Extend public sewer system to areas served by private septic systems. Existing conditions: There are two areas in the Tigard Triangle that are not currently served by the public sewer system. These areas contain single-family residential uses on private septic systems that pre-date the area's current zoning. Redevelopment of these areas would likely trigger the requirement to extend the nearby sewer mains and connect to the public sewer system. The city's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan does not identify these as capital sewer projects because they are generally considered the responsibility of the property owner(s). See Figure 5 for a map showing the unsewered areas. One area is around 69th Ave north of Dartmouth, and the other area is around Elmhurst St. east of 72nd Ave. These are shown on Figure 6 of this Report. 20. Stormwater/Sewer—Permanently fix compromised sewer lines in Red Rock Creek and restore creek channel and riparian buffer. Existing conditions: There is an existing sewer main that runs the length of the Red Rock Creek corridor in the Tigard Triangle. This main has had two breaks in the recent past that have been caused by erosive stormwater flows that have undercut the ground around the main. The city has completed emergency repairs but a permanent fix remains unfunded. See Figures 3 and 4 for two maps showing the areas of concern. Line 5201 identifies the general area of erosion, and Points 5106 and 5107 identify the location of the two breaks and subsequent repairs. 21. Water—Install new water mains as needed. Existing conditions: The TVWD Capital Improvement Plan for the adopted 2015-17 budget lists one specific project in the Tigard Triangle Area10, which is to increase the pipe size of the Metzger North-South Transmission Line to improve fire flow and provide additional capacity for future development. In general, improvements, such as replacement of aging infrastructure, are anticipated throughout the entire TVWD service area. 22. Public Spaces,Facilities,and Installations—Create a clear identity for the Triangle as a fun and diverse place to live and visit through the development of parks,plazas, greenways,public restrooms, recreational facilities,public art, wayfinding, gateway installations, and/or district signage. Existing conditions: There is currently no funding to do these improvements. 23. Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships—Provides assistance to new and existing businesses and housing developments through façade improvement grants/loans, streetscape improvements,technical/code/fee assistance, site 10 Tualatin Water District CIP Overview 2015-17 Budget,Section 17 Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 24 assembly, site cleanup/preparation, site acquisition, and/or partnerships that facilitate housing and mixed-use developments. Existing conditions: There is currently no funding to do these activities. 24. Finance Fees and Administration - This project will allow for the repayment of costs associated with the implementation of the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. It also includes ongoing administration and any financing costs associated with issuing long- and short-term debt,relocation costs and other administrative costs. Existing Conditions: As there is currently no urban renewal program in this Area,these activities do not exist. V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS The total urban renewal fund expenditures for all proposed projects by category are shown in Table 10a. Individual projects and cost estimates are shown in Table 10b. All cost estimates shown are the most current figures available at the time of the preparation of the Plan. The Plan assumes that the city will seek out other funding sources to pay for many of the urban renewal projects listed and use urban renewal funds as leverage. These sources include City of Tigard general funds and system development charges. The city may also pursue regional, County, State, and federal funding and private developer contributions. The Agency will be able to review and update fund expenditures and allocations on an annual basis when the annual budget is prepared. Table l0a—Projects to be Completed Using Urban Renewal Funds by Category Project Funding Categories Expenditures Percent (nominal $) (constant$) Allocations Transportation ($87,803,000) ($40,000,000) 42% Public Utilities ($21,410,600) ($13,000,000) 14.25% Public Spaces,Facilities,and Installations ($30,369,400) ($15,000,000) 16% Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships ($39,211,300) ($22,000,000) 23% Project Administration ($6,607,100) ($3,500,000) 3.7% Finance Fees ($1,648,100) ($1,000,000) 1.05% Total Expenditures _ (5187,049,500) I594.5O0,0001 100% Source:City of Tigard,Tiberius Solutions LLC forecasts Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 25 Table 10b—Projects to be Completed Using Urban Renewal Funds Total Proposed Project URA Project I p v e Project Description Cost lumber Funding Estimate in S\1 1 New Hwy 217 Overpass Extend Beveland Rd south over Hwy 217 to Hunker Rd/Wall St area 50 5 (Beveland) with car,ped,and oke facilities. 2 New Street(74th Ave) Extend 74th Ave south from 99W to Hermoso Way or Beveland Rd. 5 5 Ext 3 New Street(Atlanta) Extend Atlanta St west from 69th Ave to Dartmouth St or future 74th 4 3 Ave. 4 New Hwy I-5 Overpass(Beveland) Provide ped/brke bridge across Hwy I-5 from Beveland Rd to 6 1 Southwood Dr. 5 New Hwy 1-5 Overpass(Red Rock Creek) Provide ped/brke bridge across Hwy I-5 between the Triangle and 6 1 PCC Sylvania around location of Red Rock Creek. 6 Modified Intersection(Atlanta/68th) Install traffic signal and turn lanes where needed at Atlanta St/68th Ave 0.5 0.5 intersection 7 Modified Intersection(99W/68th) Add protected left turn and transit improvements on 68th Pkwy at 4 1 99W. 8 Modified Streets Develop comfortable,interesting,and attractive streetscapes TBD 3.5 throughout the Area,especially along designated pedestrian streets. 9 New Trail(Red Rock Creek) Build a new trail along Red Rock Creek parallel to and south of 99W. 3 3 10 New Streets Improve connectivity,circulation,and access throughout the Area with 5 new or extended local streets. 4 TBD.Improve 72nd Ave corridor,including intersections/interchanges. 11 Modified Street(72nd Ave) Dependent on 72nd Ave Corridor Study recommendations. TBD 8 12 Modified Street(99W) Implement access nnanagenrent strategies and median projects in Hwy TBD 0.6 99W Plan,including additional pedestrian crossing locations. 13 Modified Interchange(99W/Hwy 217) Add second left turn lane on Hwy 217 northbound ramp to 99W. 3 0.6 14 Modified Signals Upgrade signals throughout the Area with adaptive signal coordination 1.2 0.3 technology. 15 Parking Management Plan Develop a plan and implement strategies for managing parking TBD 3 16 Transportation Study Periodically evaluate the fiurctioni g of the transportation system to 0.5 0.5 refine project scope and inform project prioritization Source:City of Tigard,Tiberius Solutions LLC forecasts Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 26 Table 10b—Projects to be Completed Using Urban Renewal Funds,page 2 Project Total Proposed 1 roject I pc Project Description Cost 1.RA =her Estimate Funding Develop a stormwater master plan for the Triangle and a 17 Stomiwater/Sewer greenway plan for Red Rock Creek that addresses 0.3 0.3 stormwater,sewer,and recreational needs. 18 Stormwater Construct approximately three regional stormwater facilities to TBD 8.2 meet new DEQ regulations for water quantity management. 19 Sewer Extend public sewer system to areas served by private septic 5 1 systems. • 20 Stommwater/Sewer Permanently fix compromised sewer lines in Red Rock Creek 3 3 and restore creek channel and riparian burr. 21 Water Install new water mains as needed. 4 0.5 Creates a clear identity for the Triangle as a fun and diverse place to live and visit through the development of parks, 22 Public Spaces,Facilities,and Installations plazas,greenways,public restrooms,recreational facilities, TBD 15 public an,wayfinding,gateway installations,and/or district signage. Provides assistance to new and existing businesses and housing developments through fagade improvement 23 Re/Development Assistance and grants/loans,streetscape improvements,technical/code/lee TBD 22 Partnerships assistance,site assembly,site clean-up/preparation,site acquistion,and/or partnerships that facilitate housing and mixed-use developments. Allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation ofthe Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan.Includes ongoing 24 Finance Fees and Plan Administration administration and any financing costs associated with issuing 4.5 4.5 long-and short-term debt,relocation costs,and other administrative costs. Total TBD $94.50 Source:City of Tigard,Tiberius Solutions LLC forecasts 1. Project Cost Estimate Notes Transportation project estimates(Projects 1 — 16)were developed by City of Tigard staff and utilized a number of relevant sources, including but not limited to cost estimates in the Tigard Transportation System Plan and Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan and itemized bids from recent capital improvement projects. The cost estimate for Project 17 came from the city's 2016-17 Capital Improvement Plan(CIP). Since the CIP estimate did not include a sewer component, the City Engineer advised increasing this estimate by$100,000. The cost estimate for Project 18 was extrapolated from regional stormwater facility estimates developed for the River Terrace Stormwater Master Plan. Since these estimates included land value assumptions for rural land,the city's Economic Development Manager advised doubling these land value assumptions in order to better reflect the cost of acquiring land in a more urbanized area. Cost estimates for Projects 19 and 21 came from the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan. These estimates were for general water and sewer system upgrades and did not contemplate any specific project. Lastly,the cost estimate for Project 20 was developed by the City Engineer after reviewing a number of similar stream restoration/sewer stabilization projects of varying scopes that were recently completed by the city. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 27 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT The schedule for construction of projects will be based on the availability of funding. The projects will be ongoing and will be completed as directed by the Agency. Rather than identify the specific timing and dollar amount of individual projects,the forecast for the allocation of funding over time is shown for four broad categories of projects: transportation; public utilities;public spaces, facilities, and installations; and re/development assistance and partnerships. Annual expenditures for project administration and finance fees are also shown. The Area is anticipated to complete all projects and have sufficient tax increment finance revenue to terminate the district in FYE 2053. The projections in the financial model assume 4.5%annual growth in the assessed value of real property in the urban renewal area, and no change in the value of personal, utility, or manufactured property value. Estimated annual expenditures by project category are shown in Table 11.All costs shown in Table 11 are in year-of-expenditure dollars,which are adjusted by 3%annually to account for inflation. The Agency may change the completion dates in their annual budgeting process or as project decisions are made in administering the Plan. The first year of tax increment collections is anticipated to be FYE 2019. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 28 Table 11 -Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 PROJECT FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance $0 $189 $9,051 $12,808 $18,545 $22,168 $21,306 $26,804 Pay-as-you-go(Transfer from TIF Fund) $167,538,676 $382,689 $195,861 $409,412 $632,573 $420,430 $664,127 $918,791 $671,361 Bond/Loan Proceeds $73,525,000 $0 $4,875,000 $0 $0 $5,550,000 $0 $0 $6,400,000 Interest Earnings $264,968 $0 $1 $45 $64 $93 $111 $107 $134 Total Resources $241,328,644 $382,689 $5,071,051 $418,508 $645,445 $5,989,068 $686,406 $940,204 $7,098,299 Expenditures(nominal$) Project Administration -$6,607,100 -$109,300 -$112,600 -$115,900 -$119,400 -$123,000 -$126,700 -$130,500 -$134,400 Transportation -$87,803,000 -$2,251,000 -$1,229,900 -$652,400 -$3,359,800 Utilities -$21,410,600 -$337,700 -$3,689,700 -$1,343,900 Public Spaces,Facilities,and Installations -$30,369,400 -$1,125,500 -$1,343,900 Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships -$39,211,300 -$273,200 -$1,125,500 -$289,800 -$507,500 -$799,400 -$538,400 -$130,500 -$739,100 Finance Fees -$1,648,100 -$109,700 -$124,900 -$144,000 Total Expenditures -$187,049,500 -$382,500 -$5,062,000 -$405,700 -$626,900 -$5,966,900 -$665,100 -$913,400 -$7,065,100 Fnding Fund Balance $189 $9,051 $12,808 $18,545 $22,168 $21,306 $26,804 $33,199 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 29 Table 11 - Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 2 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2 03 0-3 1 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 PROJECT FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance $33,199 $13,925 $6,569 $7,219 $4,829 $22,866 $34,766 $6,583 $8,013 Pay-as-you-go(Transfer from TIF Fund) $949,460 $1,240,074 $966,017 $1,283,374 $1,615,013 $1,303,586 $1,665,743 $2,044,197 $1,678,428 Bond/Loan Proceeds $0 $0 $7,200,000 $0 $0 $8,200,000 $0 $0 $9,200,000 Interest Earnings $166 $70 $33 $36 $24 $114 $174 $33 $40 Total Resources $982,825 $1,254,069 $8,172,619 $1,290,629 $1,619,866 $9,526,566 $1,700,683 $2,050,813 $10,886,481 Expenditures(nominal$) Project Administration -$138,400 -$142,600 -$146,900 -$151,300 -$155,800 -$160,500 -$165,300 -$170,200 -$175,400 Transportation -$779,000 48,023,500 Utilities -$2,937,000 -$5,260,500 Public Spaces,Facilities,and Installations -$2,716,700 -$3,507,000 Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships -$830,500 -$1,104,900 -$2,202,800 -$1,134,500 -$662,200 -$1,123,300 -$1,528,800 -$1,872,600 -$1,709,700 Finance Fees -$162,000 -$184,500 -$207,000 Total Expenditures -$968,900 -$1,247,500 -$8,165,400 -$1,285,800 -$1,597,000 -$9,491,800 -$1,694,100 -$2,042,800 -$10,859,600 Ending Fund Balance $13,925 $6,569 $7,219 $4,829 $22,866 $34,766 $6,583 $8,013 $26,881 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 30 Table 11 - Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 3 2035-36 2036-37 2037-38 2038-39 2039-40 2040-41 2041-42 2042-43 2043-44 PROJECT 1:1'\T) Resources Beginning Fund Balance $26,881 $41,724 $7,622 $5,952 $28,697 $41,240 $14,770 $5,568 $43,085 Pay-as-you-go(Transfer from TIF Fund) $2,091,709 $2,523,589 $2,116,792 $2,588,415 $2,442,000 $2,957,024 $3,495,224 $2,986,089 $3,573,817 Bond/Loan Proceeds $0 $0 $9,300,000 $0 $10,200,000 $0 $0 $12,600,000 $0 Interest Earnings $134 $209 $38 $30 $143 $206 $74 $28 $215 Total Resources $2,118,724 $2,565,522 $11,424,452 $2,594,397 $12,670,840 $2,998,470 $3,510,068 $15,591,685 $3,617,117 Expenditures(nominal$) Project Administration -$180,600 -$186,000 -$191,600 -$197,400 -$203,300 -$209,400 -$215,700 -$222.100 -$228,800 Transportation -$9,580,500 -$680,500 -$1,132,200 -$9,051,800 -$2,802,700 Utilities -$4,065,600 -$3,776,200 Public Spaces,Facilities,and Installations -$6,098,400 Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships -$1,896,400 -$2,371,900 -$1,437,100 -$2,368,300 -$2,032,800 -$2.093,800 -$2,156,600 -$2,221,300 -$572,000 Finance Fees -$209,300 -$229,500 -$277,200 Total Expenditures -$2,077,000 -$2,557,900 -$11,418,500 -$2,565,700 -$12,629,600 -$2,983,700 -$3,504,500 -$15,548,600 -$3,603,500 Ending Fund Balance $41,724 $7,622 $5,952 $28,697 $41,240 $14,770 $5,568 $43,085 $13,617 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 31 Table 1 1 - Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars. page 4 2044-45 2045-46 2046-47 204?-48 2 04 8-4 9 2049-50 2 05 0-5 1 20 51-5 2 2052-53 PROJECT FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance $13,617 $18,878 $22,531 $36,699 $56,713 $58,891 $39,254 $62,436 $60,831 Pay-as-you-go(Transfer from TIF Fund) $4,187,993 $5,343,359 $6,014,055 $6,714,931 $8,025,094 $8,790,469 $9,590,286 $11,084,083 $11,957,502 Bond/Loan Proceeds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Interest Earnings $68 $94 $113 $183 $284 $294 $196 $312 $304 Total Resources $4,201,678 $5,362,331 $6,036,699 $6,751,813 $8,082,091 $8,849,654 $9,629,736 $11,146,831 $12,018,637 Expenditures(nominal S) Project Administration -$235,700 -$242,700 -$250,000 -$257,500 -$265,200 -$273,200 -$281,400 -$289,800 -$298,500 Transportation -$4,490,300 -$5,793,800 -$7,990,800 -$8,723,100 -$10,216,500 -$11,045,200 Utilities Public Spaces,Facilities,and Installations -$3,358,000 -$5,125,000 -$7,094,900 Re/Development Assistance and Partnerships -$589,100 -$606,800 -$625,000 -$643,800 -$663,100 -$546,400 -$562,800 -$579,700 -$671,700 Finance Fees Total Expenditures -$4,182,800 -$5,339,800 -$6,000,000 -$6,695,100 -$8,023,200 -$8,810,400 -$9,567,300 -$11,086,000 -$12,015,400 Fining Fund Balance $18,878 $22,531 $36,699 $56,713 $58,891 $39,254 $62,436 $60,831 $3,237 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 32 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED Table 12 shows the allocation of tax increment revenues to debt service and transfers to the project fund. It is anticipated that all debt will be retired by FYE 2053 (any outstanding bonds will be defeased). The maximum indebtedness is $188,000,000(one hundred and eighty-eight million dollars). The estimated total amount of tax increment revenues required to service the maximum indebtedness of$188 million is$278,560,738 and is made up of tax increment revenues from permanent rate levies. The interest rate for the loans and bonds are estimated at 5%with varying terms. The assumed financing plan maintains a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.5 x total annual debt service payments. The time frame of urban renewal is not absolute; it may vary depending on the actual ability to meet the maximum indebtedness. If the economy is slower, it may take longer; if the economy is more robust than the projections, it may take a shorter time period. The Agency may decide to issue bonds or take on loans on a different schedule, and that will alter the financing assumptions. These assumptions show one scenario for financing and that this scenario is financially feasible. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 33 Table 12-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Total 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 DEBT SERVICE FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TIF for URA $278,560.738 $382.689 $587,044 $800,595 $1,023,756 $1,256,959 $1,500.656 $1,755,320 $2,021,443 Total Resources $278,560,738 $382,689 $587,044 $800,595 $1,023,756 $1,256,959 $1,500,656 $1,755,320 $2,021,443 Expenditures Debt Service New Loan 2020 -$7.823,660 -$391.183 -$391.183 -$391,183 -$391,183 4391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 New Loan 2023 -$8,906,920 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 New Loan 2026 -$10,271,060 -$513,553 New Loan 2029 -$11,554,940 New Loan 2032 -$13,159,780 New Loan 2035 -$14,463,826 New Loan 2038 -$13,729,760 New Loan 2040 -$14,426,216 New Loan 2043 -$16.685,900 Total Debt Service -$111,022,062 $0 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$836,529 -$836,529 -$836,529 -$1,350,082 Coverage Ratio $0 $2 $2 $3 $2 $2 $2 $1 Transfer to Project Fund -$167,538,676 -$382,689 -$195,861 -$409,412 -$632,573 -$420,430 -$664,127 -$918,791 -$671,361 Total Expenditures -$278,560,738 -$382,689 -$587,044 -$800,595 -$1,023,756 -$1,256,959 -$1,500,656 -$1,755,320 -$2,021,443 Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cumulative D/S Remaining -$111,022,062 -$110,630,879 -$110,239,696 -$109,848,513 -$109.011.984 -$108,175,455 -$107,338,926 -$105,988,844 TIF Sufficient to Pay Off D/S NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 34 Table 12-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service,page 2 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 DEBT SERVICE FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TIF for URA $2,299,542 $2,590,156 $2,893,846 $3,211,203 $3,542,842 $3,889,404 $4,251,561 $4,630,015 $5,025,500 Total Resources $2,299,542 $2,590,156 $2,893,846 $3,211,203 $3,542,842 $3,889,404 $4,251,561 $4,630,015 $5,025,500 Expenditures Debt Service New Loan 2020 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 New Loan 2023 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 New Loan 2026 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 New Loan 2029 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 New Loan 2032 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 New Loan 2035 -$761,254 New Loan 2038 New Loan 2040 New Loan 2043 Total Debt Service -$1,350,082 -$1,350,082 -$1,927,829 -$1,927,829 -$1,927,829 -$2,585,818 -$2,585,818 -$2,585,818 -$3,347,072 Coverage Ratio $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 Transfer to Project Fund -$949,460 -$1,240,074 -$966,017 -$1,283,374 -$1,615,013 -$1,303,586 -$1,665,743 -$2,044,197 -$1,678,428 Total Expenditures -$2,299,542 -$2,590,156 -$2,893,846 -$3,211,203 -$3,542,842 -$3,889,404 -$4,251,561 -$4,630,015 -$5,025,500 Ending Fund Balance $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cumulative D/S Remaining -$104,638,762 -$103,288,680 -$101,360,851 -$99,433,022 -$97,505,193 -$94,919,375 -$92,333,557 -$89,747,739 -$86,400,667 TIF Sufficient to Pay Off D/S NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 35 Table 12 -Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service, page 3 2035-36 2 036-3 7 2 03 7-3 8 2038-39 2039-40 2040-41 2041-42 2042-43 2043-44 DEBT SERVICE FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TIF for URA $5,438,781 $5,870,661 $6,321,974 $6,793,597 $7,286,443 $7,801,467 $8,339,667 $8,902,086 $9,489,814 Total Resources $5,438,781 $5,870,661 $6,321,974 $6,793,597 $7,286,443 $7,801,467 $8,339,667 $8,902,086 $9,489,814 Expenditures Debt Service New Loan 2020 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 -$391,183 New Loan 2023 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 -$445,346 New Loan 2026 -$513,553 4513.553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 -$513,553 New Loan 2029 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 New Loan 2032 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 New Loan 2035 -$761,254 -$761.254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 New Loan 2038 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 New Loan 2040 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 New Loan 2043 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 Total Debt Service -$3,347,072 -$3,347,072 -$4,205,182 -$4,205,182 -S4,844,443 -$4,844,443 -$4,844,443 -$5,915,997 -$5,915,997 Coverage Ratio $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 Transfer to Project Fund -$2,091,709 -$2,523,589 -$2,116,792 -$2,588,415 -$2,442,000 -$2,957,024 -$3,495,224 -$2.986,089 -$3,573,817 Total Expenditures -$5,438,781 -$5,870,661 -$6,321,974 -$6,793,597 -$7,286,443 -$7,801,467 -$8,339,667 -$8,902,086 -$9,489,814 Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cumulative D/S Remaining • -$83,053,595 -$79,706,523 -$75,501,341 -$71,296,159 -$66,451,716 -$61,607,273 -$56,762,830 -$50,846,833 -$44,930,836 TIF Sufficient to Pay Off D/S NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 36 Table 12 -Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service, page 4 21144-45 2045-46 2046-47 2047-48 2048-49 2049-50 2050-51 2051-52 2052-53 DV BT SERVICE FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TIF for URA $10,103,990 $10,745,803 $11,416,499 $12,117,375 $12,849,791 $13,615,166 $14,414,983 $15,250,791 $16,124,210 Total Resources $10,103,990 $10,745,803 $11,416,499 $12,117,375 $12,849,791 $13,615,166 $14,414,983 $15,250,791 $16,124,210 Expenditures Debt Service New Loan 2020 New Loan 2023 New Loan 2026 -$513,553 New Loan 2029 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 -$577,747 New Loan 2032 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 -$657,989 New Loan 2035 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 -$761,254 New Loan 2038 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 -$858,110 New Loan 2040 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 -$1,030,444 New Loan 2043 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 -$1,516,900 Total Debt Service -$5,915,997 -$5,402,444 -$5,402,444 -$5,402,444 -$4,824,697 -$4,824,697 -$4,824,697 -$4,166,708 -$4,166,708 Coverage Ratio $2 $2 $2 $2 $3 $3 $3 $4 $4 Transfer to Project Fund -$4,187,993 -$5,343,359 -$6,014,055 -$6,714,931 -$8,025,094 -$8,790,469 -$9,590,286 -$11,084,083 -$11,957,502 Total Expenditures -$10,103,990 -$10,745,803 -$11,416,499 -$12,117,375 -$12,849,791 -$13,615,166 -$14,414,983 -$15,250,791 -$16,124,210 Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Cumulative D/S Remaining -$39,014,839 -$33,612,395 -$28,209,951 -$22,807,507 -$17,982,810 -$13,158,113 -$8,333,416 -$4,166,708 $0 TIF Sufficient to Pay Off D/S NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC • Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 37 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN The estimated tax increment revenues through FYE 2053, as shown above, are based on projections of the assessed value of development within the Area and the consolidated tax rate that will apply in the Area. The assumptions include assumed growth in assessed value of 4.5%for real property, derived from a combination of appreciation of existing property values and new construction.No change in value for personal, utility, and manufactured property is assumed. Table 13 shows the projected incremental assessed value,tax rates and tax increment revenues each year, adjusted for discounts, delinquencies, and compression losses. These projections of increment are the basis for the projections in Tables 11 and 12. The first year of tax increment collections is FYE 2019. Gross TIF is calculated by multiplying the tax rate times the excess value.The tax rate is per thousand dollars of value, so the calculation is"tax rate times excess value divided by one thousand." The consolidated tax rate includes permanent tax rates only, and excludes general obligation bonds and local option levies which would not be impacted by this Plan. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 38 Table 13 —Projected Incremental Assessed Value, Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues Tax Increment Finance Revenue Cumulatixe INF, Assessed\al Ile Frozen Base Excess\aluc l ax Rate Gross 7 II. .Adjustments Net TIF TIF 2019 $463,541,305 $429,654,966 $33,886,339 11.8877 402,831 (20,142) 382,689 382,689 2020 $481,636,527 $429,654,966 $51,981,561 11.8877 617,941 (30,897) 587,044 969,733 2021 $500,546,034 $429,654,966 $70,891,068 11.8877 842,732 (42,137) 800,595 1,770,328 2022 $520,306,469 $429,654,966 $90,651,503 11.8877 1,077,638 (53,882) 1,023,756 2,794,084 2023 $540,956,123 $429,654,966 $111,301,157 11.8877 1,323,115 (66,156) 1,256,959 4,051,043 2024 $562,535,012 $429,654,966 $132,880,046 11.8877 1,579,638 (78,982) 1,500,656 5,551,699 2025 $585,084,951 $429,654,966 $155,429,985 11.8877 1,847,705 (92,385) 1,755,320 7,307,019 2026 $608,649,637 $429,654,966 $178,994,671 11.8877 2,127,835 (106,392) 2,021,443 9,328,462 2027 $633,274,734 $429,654,966 $203,619,768 11.8877 2,420,571 (121,029) 2,299,542 11,628,004 2028 $659,007,960 $429,654,966 $229,352,994 11.8877 2,726,480 (136,324) 2,590,156 14,218,160 2029 $685,899,181 $429,654,966 $256,244,215 11.8877 3,046,154 (152,308) 2,893,846 17,112,006 2030 $714,000,507 $429,654,966 $284,345,541 11.8877, 3,380,214 (169,011) 3,211,203 20,323,209 2031 $743,366,393 $429,654,966 $313,711,427 11.8877 3,729,307 (186,465) 3,542,842 23,866,051 2032 $774,053,744 $429,654,966 $344,398,778 11.8877, 4,094,109 (204,705) 3,889,404 27,755,455 2033 $806,122,026 $429,654,966 $376,467,060 11.8877 4,475.327 (223,766) 4,251,561 32,007,016 2034 $839,633,380 $429,654,966 $409,978,414 11.8877 4,873,700 (243,685) 4,630,015 36,637,031 2035 $874,652,745 $429,654,966 $444,997,779 11.8877 5,290,000 (264,500) 5,025,500 41,662,531 2036 $911,247,982 $429,654,966 $481,593,016 11.8877 5,725,033 (286,252) 5,438,781 47,101,312 2037 $949,490,004 $429,654,966 $519,835,038 11.8877 6,179,643 (308,982) 5,870,661 52,971,973 2038 $989,452,917 $429,654,966 $559,797,951 11.8877 6,654,710 (332,736), 6,321,974 59,293,947 2039 $1,031,214,161 $429,654,966 $601,559,195 11.8877 7,151,155 (357,558) 6,793,597 66,087,544 2040 $1,074,854,661 $429,654,966 $645,199,695 11.8877 7,669,940 (383,497) 7,286,443 73,373,987 2041 $1,120,458,984 $429,654,966 $690,804,018 11.8877 8,212,071 (410,604) 7,801,467 81,175,454 2042 $1,168,115,501 $429,654,966 $738,460,535 11.8877 8,778,597 (438,930) 8,339,667 89,515,121 2043 $1,217,916,562 $429,654,966 $788,261,596 11.8877 9,370,617 (468,531) 8,902,086 98,417,207 2044 $1,269,958,670 $429,654,966 $840,303,704 11.8877 9,989,278 (499,464) 9,489,814 107,907,021 2045 $1,324,342,673 $429,654,966 $894,687,707 11.8877 10,635,779 (531,789) 10,103,990 118,011,011 2046 $1,381,173,956 $429,654,966 $951,518,990 11.8877 11,311,372 (565,569) 10,745,803 128,756,814 2047 $1,440,562,647 $429,654,966 $1,010,907,681 11.8877 12,017,367 (600,868) 11,416,499 140,173,313 2048 $1,502,623,829 $429,654,966 $1,072,968,863 11.8877 12,755,132 (637,757) 12,117,375 152,290,688 2049 $1,567,477,764 $429,654,966 $1,137,822,798 11.8877 13,526.096 (676,305) 12,849,791 165,140,479 2050 $1,635,250,126 $429,654,966 $1,205,595,160 11.8877 14,331.754 (716,588) 13,615,166 178,755,645 2051 $1,706,072,245 $429,654,966 $1,276,417,279 11.8877 15,173,666 (758,683) 14,414,983 193,170,628 2052 $1,780,081,359 $429,654,966 $1,350,426,393 11.8877 16,053,464 (802,673) 15,250,791 208,421,419 2053 $1,857,420,883 $429,654,966 $1,427,765,917 11.8877 16,972,853 (848,643) 16,124,210 224,545,629 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes:TIF is tax increment revenues.Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Revenue sharing is part of the 2009 legislative changes to urban renewal and means that, at thresholds defined in ORS 457.470,the impacted taxing jurisdictions will receive a share of the incremental growth in the area. The share is a percentage basis dependent upon the tax rates of the taxing jurisdictions. The first threshold is 10%of the original maximum indebtedness. At the 10%threshold,the Agency will receive the full 10%of the initial maximum indebtedness plus 25%of the increment above the 10%threshold and the taxing jurisdictions will receive 75%of the increment above the 10%threshold. The second threshold is set at 12.5%of the maximum indebtedness. If this threshold is met,revenue for the district would be capped at 12.5%of the maximum indebtedness, with all additional tax revenue being shared with affected taxing districts. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 39 This 12.5%threshold is not anticipated to be reached prior to the termination of this district. Revenue sharing targets are not projected to be reached during the life of the Area. If assessed value in the Area grows more quickly than projected,the revenue sharing triggers could be reached. IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING This section describes the impact of tax increment financing of the maximum indebtedness, both until and after the indebtedness is repaid, upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the Area. The impact of tax increment financing on overlapping taxing districts consists primarily of the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in assessed value in the Area. These projections are for impacts estimated through FYE 2053, and are shown in Tables 14a and 14b. The Tigard-Tualatin School District and the Northwest Regional Education Service District are not directly affected by the tax increment financing,but the amounts of their taxes divided for the urban renewal plan are shown in the following tables. Under current school funding law,property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund revenues to achieve per-student funding targets. Under this system,property taxes foregone, due to the use of tax increment financing,may be replaced with State School Fund revenues, as determined by a funding formula at the State level. Local revenues, including property tax revenues, are an offset under the State School Fund formula. Tables 14a and 14b show the projected impacts to permanent rate levies of taxing districts as a result of this Plan. Table 14a shows the general government levies,and Table 14b shows the education levies. General obligation bonds and local option levies are impacted by urban renewal only if they were originally approved by voters in an election prior to October 6,2001. There are no local option levies or general obligation bonds approved prior to October 6,2001 that will still be in effect in the Area at the time that tax increment revenues begin to be collected. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 40 Table 14a-Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies - General Government General Government Tigard/Tualatin Washington County City of Tigard TVFR Port of Portland Metro Aquatic District I1 I. Perm Terni Perm Perm Perm Perm 'subtotal 2019 ($72,381) ($80,902) ($49,099) ($2,257) ($486) ($2,897) ($208,022) 2020 ($111,032) ($124,103) ($75,318) ($3,462) ($746) ($4,444) ($319,105) 2021 ($151,422) ($169,248) ($102,717) ($4,721) ($1,017) ($6,061) ($435,186) 2022 ($193,630) ($216,425) ($131,349) ($6,037) ($1,300) ($7,751) ($556,492) 2023 ($237,737) ($265,725) ($161,269) ($7,412) ($1,597) ($9,516) ($683,256) 2024 ($283,829) ($317,244) ($192,535) ($8,849) ($1,906) ($11,361) ($815,724) 2025 ($331,995) ($371,081) ($225,209) ($10,351) ($2,230) ($13,289) ($954,155) 2026 ($382,329) ($427,340) ($259,353) ($11,920) ($2,568) ($15,304) ($1,098,814) 2027 ($434,928) ($486,131) ($295,033) ($13,560) ($2,921) ($17,409) ($1,249,982) 2028 ($489,893) ($547,568) ($332,319) ($15,274) ($3,290) ($19,610) ($1,407,954) 2029 ($547,332) ($611,769) ($371,282) ($17,065) ($3,676) ($21,909) ($1,573,033) 2030 ($607,356) ($678,859) ($412,000) ($18,936) ($4,079) ($24,312) ($1,745,542) 2031 ($670,081) ($748,969) ($454,549) ($20,892) ($4,500) ($26,822) ($1,925,813) 2032 ($735,629) ($822,233) ($499,013) ($22,935) ($4,940) ($29,446) ($2,114,196) 2033 ($804,126) ($898,794) ($545,478) ($25,071) ($5,400) ($32,188) ($2,311,057) 2034 ($875,706) ($978,801) ($594,034) ($27,303) ($5,881) ($35,053) ($2,516,778) 2035 ($950,506) ($1,062,408) ($644,775) ($29,635) ($6,383) ($38,047) ($2,731,754) 2036 ($1,028,673) ($1,149,777) ($697,799) ($32,072) ($6,908) ($41,176) ($2,956,405) 2037 ($1,110,357) ($1,241,078) ($753,210) ($34,618) ($7,457) ($44,446) ($3,191,166) 2038 ($1,195,717) ($1,336,487) ($811,114) ($37,280) ($8,030) ($47,863) ($3,436,491) 2039 ($1,284,918) ($1,436,189) ($871,623) ($40,061) ($8,629) ($51,433) ($3,692,853) 2040 ($1,378,134) ($1,540,379) ($934,856) ($42,967) ($9,255) ($55,165) ($3,960,756) 2041 ($1,475,543) ($1,649,257) ($1,000,934) ($46,004) ($9,910) ($59,064) ($4,240,712) 2042 ($1,577,337) ($1,763,034) ($1,069,985) ($49,178) ($10,593) ($63,138) ($4,533,265) 2043 ($1,683,711) ($1,881,931) ($1,142,144) ($52,494) ($11,308) ($67,396) ($4,838,984) 2044 ($1,794,872) ($2,006,179) ($1,217,550) ($55,960) ($12,054) ($71,846) ($5,158,461) 2045 ($1,911,035) ($2,136,018) ($1,296,349) ($59,582) ($12,834) ($76,496) ($5,492,314) 2046 ($2,032,425) ($2,271,699) ($1,378,694) ($63,366) ($13,650) ($81,355) ($5,841,189) 2047 ($2,159,279) ($2,413,487) ($1,464,745) ($67,321) ($14,501) ($86,433) ($6,205,766) 2048 ($2,291,840) ($2,561,654) ($1,554,667) ($71,454) ($15,392) ($91,739) ($6,586,746) 2049 ($2,430,367) ($2,716,489) ($1,648,637) ($75,773) ($16,322) ($97,284) ($6,984,872) 2050 ($2,575,127) ($2,878,292) ($1,746,835) ($80,287) ($17,294) ($103,078) ($7,400,913) 2051 ($2,726,402) ($3,047,376) ($1,849,452) ($85,003) ($18,310) ($109,134) ($7,835,677) 2052 ($2,884,484) ($3,224,069) ($1,956,687) ($89,932) ($19,372) ($115,461) ($8,290,005) 2053 ($3,049,679) ($3,408,713_ ($2,068,747) ($95,082) ($20,481) ($122,074) ($8,764,776) Total ($42,469,812) ($47,469,708) ($28,809,360) ($1,324,114) ($285,220) ($1,700,000) ($122,058,214) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 41 Table 14b-Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies -Education Lclocation NW Regional Tigard- I'('(' ESD Tualatin SD FIE Perin Perm Perm Subtotal 'Total 2019 ($9,104) ($4,951) ($160,612) ($174,667) ($382,689) 2020 ($13,965) ($7,595) ($246,379) ($267,939) ($587,044) 2021 ($19,046) ($10,358) ($336,005) ($365,409) ($800,595) 2022 ($24,354) ($13,245) ($429,665) ($467,264) ($1,023,756) 2023 ($29,902) ($16,262) ($527,539) ($573,703) ($1,256,959) 2024 ($35,700) ($19,415) ($629,817) ($684,932) ($1,500,656) 2025 ($41,758) ($22,710) ($736,698) ($801,166) ($1,755,321) 2026 ($48,089) ($26,153) ($848,388) ($922,630) ($2,021,444) 2027 ($54,704) ($29,751) ($965,105) ($1,049,560) ($2,299,542) 2028 ($61,618) ($33,511) ($1,087,074) ($1,182,203) ($2,590,157) 2029 ($68,843) ($37,440) ($1,214,531) ($1,320,814) ($2,893,847) 2030 ($76,392) ($41,546) ($1,347,724) ($1,465,662) ($3,211,204) 2031 ($84,282) ($45,836) ($1,486,911) ($1,617,029) ($3,542,842) 2032 ($92,526) ($50,320) ($1,632,361) ($1,775,207) ($3,889,403) 2033 ($101,142) ($55,006) ($1,784,356) ($1,940,504) ($4,251,561) 2034 ($110,145) ($59,902) ($1,943,191) ($2,113,238) ($4,630,016) 2035 ($119,553) ($65,019) ($2,109,174) ($2,293,746) ($5,025,500) 2036 ($129,385) ($70,366) ($2'282'625) ($2,482,376) ($5,438,781) 2037 ($139,659) ($75,953) ($2,463,883) ($2,679,495) ($5,870,661) 2038 ($150,395) ($81,792) ($2,653,296) ($2,885,483) ($6,321,974) 2039 ($161,615) ($87,894) ($2,851,234) ($3,100,743) ($6,793,596) 2040 ($173,339) ($94,270) ($3,058,079) ($3,325,688) ($7,286,444) 2041 ($185,591) ($100,933) ($3,274,231) ($3,560,755) ($7,801,467) 2042 ($198,395) ($107,896) ($3,500,111) ($3,806,402) ($8,339,667) 2043 ($211,774) ($115,173) ($3,736,155) ($4,063,102) ($8,902,086) 2044 ($225,756) ($122,777) ($3,982,821) ($4,331,354) ($9,489,815) 2045 ($240,367) ($130,723) ($4,240,587) ($4,611,677) ($10,103,991) 2046 ($255,635) ($139,026) ($4,509,952) ($4,904,613) ($10,745,802) 2047 ($271,590) ($147,704) ($4,791,440) ($5,210,734) ($11,416,500) 2048 ($288,264) ($156,771) ($5,085,593) ($5,530,628) ($12,117,374) 2049 ($305,687) ($166,247) ($5,392,984) ($5,864,918) ($12,849,790) 2050 ($323,895) ($176,150) ($5,714,208) ($6,214,253) ($13,615,166) 2051 ($342,922) ($186,497) ($6,049,886) ($6,579,305) ($14,414,982) 2052 ($362,806) ($197,31 I) ($6,400,670) ($6,960,787) ($15,250,792) 2053 ($383,584) ($208,611) ($6,767,239) ($7,359,434) ($16,124,210) Total ($5,341,782) ($2,905,114) ($94,240,524) ($102,487,420) ($224,545,634) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 42 Table 15 shows the projected increased revenue to the taxing jurisdictions after tax increment proceeds are projected to be terminated. These projections are for FYE 2054. Table 15—Additional Revenues Obtained after Termination of Tax Increment Financing Tax ReNenue in FYE2054(year after expiration) From Frozen 'Faxing District Tax Rate Base From Excess Value Total General Government Washington County 2.2484 $ 966,036.00 $ 3,391,904.00 $ 4,357,940.00 City of Tigard 2.5131 $ 1,079,766.00 $ 3,791,227.00 $ 4,870,993.00 TVFR 1.5252 $ 655,310.00 $ 2,300,895.00 $ 2,956,205.00 Port of Portland 0.0701 $ 30,119.00 $ 105,752.00 $ 135,871.00 Metro 0.0151 $ 6,488.00 $ 22,780.00 $ 29,268.00 Tigard/Tualatin Aquatic District 0.0900 $ 38,669.00 $ 135,773.00 $ 174,442.00 Subtotal 6.4619 $ 2,776,387.00 $ 9,748,330.00 $ 12,524,719.00 Education PCC 0.2828 $ 121,506.00 $ 426,628.00 $ 548,134.00 NW Regional ESD 0.1538 $ 66,081.00 $ 232,020.00 $ 298,101.00 Tigard-Tualatin SD 4.9892 $ 2,143,635.00 $ 7,526,636.00 $ 9,670,271.00 Tigard-Tualatin SD(GO Bond) 0.0000 $ - $ - $ - Subtotal 5.4258 $ 2,331,222.00 $ 8,185,284.00 $ 10,516,506.00 Total 11.8877 $5,107,610.00 $ 17,933,615.00 $ 23,041,225.00 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 43 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA State law limits the percentage of both a municipality's total assessed value and the total land area that can be contained in an urban renewal area at the time of its establishment to 15%for municipalities over 50,000 in population.As noted below,the frozen base(assumed to be FYE 2017 values), including all real,personal,personal,manufactured, and utility properties in the Area, is projected to be$429,654,966. The total assessed value of the City of Tigard, minus excess value of the city's existing urban renewal area is $5,875,954,608. Excess value is the assessed value created above the frozen base in an urban renewal area. The total urban renewal assessed value of the two urban renewal areas is 8.49%of the total assessed value of the city, minus excess value,which is below the 15%statutory limitation. The Area contains 547.9 acres, including public rights-of-way, and the City of Tigard contains 8,129 acres. After accounting for the acreage in the city's other urban renewal area, 9.12 %of the city's acreage is in an urban renewal area, which is below the 15% statutory limitation. Table 16—Urban Renewal Area Conformance with Assessed Value and Acreage Limits \ssc,sed Value UR Excess Acreaec City of Tigard $5,907,591,736 8,129 City of Tigard minus Urban Renewal(UR)excess $5,875,954,608 Existing Tigard City Center UR Area $69,207,378 $31,637,128 193.71 Proposed Tigard Triangle UR Area $429,654,966 547.90 City Center and Tigard Triangle UR Areas $498,862,344 741.61 Percentage in UR Areas 8.49% 9.12% Source:Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting,LLC with data from City of Tigard and Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) XI. RELOCATION REPORT There is no relocation report required for the Plan.No specific acquisitions that would result in relocation benefits have been identified; however,there are plans to acquire land for infrastructure which may trigger relocation benefits in the future in the Area. Report on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area 44 EXHIBIT C City of Tigard • TIGARD Memorandum To: Mayor John Cook and Members of Council From: Calista Fitzgerald,President of Tigard Planning Commission Re: Planning Commission Recommendation on Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Date: November 15,2016 On November 14,2016, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan (Plan). After considering the staff report and public testimony, the Planning Commission made a unanimous recommendation that City Council approve the Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 457 governing urban renewal, the Planning Commission found that the Plan conforms to the city's goals and objectives as contained in the Comprehensive Plan and the community's vision for the area as described in the recently completed Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan. One member of the public,Jim Long, requested that the Planning Commission recommend that City Council expand the proposed Plan boundary to include property adjacent to and north of the proposed boundary for potential future development as a neighborhood park. The proposed expansion area includes three lots totaling 1.54 acres that are zoned Professional Commercial and contain single-family uses. See the attached map showing the proposed Plan boundary and the lots in question (Tax Lots 1S136ACO2200, 02400, and 02500 at the northwest corner of SW 72nd Ave and SW Spruce Street)). The Planning Commission made and passed a motion 5—4 in favor of asking City Council to consider Mr. Long's request during the City Council hearing on the Plan. Staff explained that Mr. Long served on the Citizen Advisory Council (CAC) for the development of the Plan and also made this request during the last CAC meeting in October. CAC members discussed the proposal at length and ultimately rejected it with a vote of 6 —2. Staff will provide a copy of the CAC meeting notes to City Council for their consideration. Page 1 I Planning Commission Recommendation Proposed Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Area Boundary Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area " . .0,01,41 04.1 . c.... - - ...... 2A." ir .$4? a ea a - a 3 e J * :■r- 1\ : lb_ a Lots Subject of Boundary - 1 i".!....!_..,......A. . 1JJJ 1 Expansion • • r„) ,,,,,r- Request • f_ : , _I 41/ 7 • H 1 1 ii-i-; El * i 1 , 1 • sal 18 Tf-_-_-1411 . . • . 1 J.1) 1. i . 1 .. _,, , , . ., , ),„ 1 L_J___ .• r----- Ns j, . ..• -- Vi' / ii111:717.4 2 ''''' 1----.' . MI' I FO F---, .• V III i NI L___ L_. i, , •. \-I _ mow mint ittii •., ] On am 4 Li LiJ L -0 I it 2 • ce •• \ IL_ '••• immL 11--Jr----: , szzt. ._ ,, A\ .. \ ker.R'd'.... \-j1 _ rep pii .1 , . ' ill• , / , ,____], , 1 , ------, , •. ii, , . . _, . .•. _ 'A -W*; ,,,j 1.464: l', \ • ij i'i-S • i Ifki, i • '\ i 4,, • oss* • • Tigard Triangle URA **Ix._ ••••• • • • I I 0 500 1,000 feet se43 14, e Page 2 I Planning Commission Recommendation ATTACHMENT 2 Tigard Triangle Citizen Advisory Council (CAC) Meeting 1011 Is T I c A R D Meeting #4 — Summary Monday,October 24,2016,6:00-8:OOPM Quality Inn,Tigard CAC Members Present:David Walsh,City Center Advisory Committee;Katen Patel,Triangle Property Owner;Cathy Olsen,Neighborhood Involvement Committee;Veronica Smith,Citizen-At-Large;Jim Long, Metzger East Tigard and Durham Citizen Participation Organization;Calista Fitzgerald,Planning Commission;Elise Shearer,Transportation Advisory Committee;Dustin White,Citizen-at-Large;John Goodhouse,City Council CAC Members Absent: Zack Dean,Youth Advisory Committee;John Boren,Citizen at Large;Scott Hancock,Library Board;Gary Jelinek,Planning Commission City Staff Present: Susan Shanks,Senior Planner;Sean Farrelly,Redevelopment Project Manager;Hannah Holloway,Project Planning Assistant Other Project Team Present: Elaine Howard,Elaine Howard Consulting LLC;Alex Dupey,MIG Inc. Members of the Public Present: DJ Heffernan,Specht Development;Nancy Tracy I. Welcome Overview of meeting agenda II. Open House Recap Susan Shanks gave an overview of the Tigard Triangle Open House meeting that took place on October 20, 2016. The event was well attended,and most members of the public were generally in favor of using urban renewal in the Triangle. III. Urban Renewal Plan Overview Elaine Howard reviewed the key components of the proposed draft plan. It was reviewed by the Tigard Development Agency on October 4,2016, and subsequently sent out for review and comment to the affected taxing districts. Since the last CAC meeting,the plan was revised as follows: o Parking projects moved to Transportation category o Transportation Project#4 removed per ODOT's request o Utilities category clarified for public,not private,utilities o Public Spaces projects described in more detail o Plan Evaluation language added o Near term project priorities modified to reflect CAC/TAC priorities Staff,at the request of TVFR,is considering some additional changes: o Limit plan to 35 years even if maximum indebtedness is not achieved o Require approval of 75%of taxing districts to amend the plan's duration or maximum indebtedness Page 1 of 3 CAC Meeting#4 Summary October 24,2016 IV. Tigard City Center Substantial Amendment Sean Farrelly,Redevelopment Project Manager with the City of Tigard,provided background on the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. The plan started two years before the recession and thus it is not on track to meet the original$22M maximum indebtedness within its 20-year timeline. Staff are now proposing to amend the plan to increase the original acreage by 20%. CAC members briefly discussed the importance of selecting a plan duration that can stand up to an unpredictable economy. Some members reaffirmed their support for the 35-year plan. V. Streetscape Design Plan Alex Dupey presented the Tigard Triangle Streetscape Design Plan. Dupey reviewed the proposed street design types in the Triangle,as well as ideas for improving safety,pedestrian and bike facilities,on-street parking,and stormwater management in the near and long term.The presentation highlighted how pedestrian,access,and transitional street designs support the vision for a more walkable urban district and complement draft Lean Code development standards and urban renewal funding priorities. VI. CAC Recommendation CAC Member Walsh made a motion to recommend that City Council adopt the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan as written and CAC Member Fitzgerald seconded the motion. 8 members voted on the motion as follows: o Support(7) o Support with reservations (1) When asked his reasons for supporting the plan with reservations,Jim Long explained that he would like City staff to evaluate amending the plan's northern boundary to include the commercially-zoned property on the north side of Spruce Street at 72nd Ave for future development as a neighborhood park. The property abuts the proposed urban renewal district boundary on its northern edge,is privately owned,and contains a single-family use.Long explained that this area is deficient in parks. Several area residents have been advocating for a park in this location and have signed a petition that Jim provided as an example of the neighborhood's support for a park. CAC Member Long made a motion to have city staff evaluate the feasibility of including this property in the urban renewal area boundary and CAC Member Shearer seconded the motion. 8 members voted on the motion as follows: o Support(2) o Oppose (6) Those opposed expressed concern about whether the addition of this property was in line with the goals and objectives developed for the plan by the CAC and TAC,which are about providing funding for projects within the Triangle and commercial properties adjacent to 99W. The latter specifically being for the purpose of facilitating facade and access improvements on both sides of the highway. Some members expressed support for parks in general, especially for areas deficient in parks,and asserted that the addition of this property could generate public support for the plan. However,others pointed out that many of these potential park supporters were not city residents,would not be able to vote for the plan, and that there was no guarantee that the city could acquire this property for park purposes. Still others wondered whether the amount of time and money needed to amend the plan at this stage in the process was a good use of resources. Page 2 of 3 CAC Meeting#4 Summary October 24,2016 VII. Questions and Comments Elise Shearer: Streetscape designations (pedestrian-oriented,auto-oriented,etc.) should be determined before development happens. Susan Shanks indicated that the Lean Code will have a fee-in-lieu-of- construction option for street improvements, so that development does not build something that later needs to be torn out if a final cross section for a specific street has not yet been determined at the time of development due to the need for additional analysis,e.g. 72nd Ave. DJ Heffernan: Development assistance should be prioritized toward the beginning of the plan. Susan Shanks indicated that CAC and TAC members came to the same conclusion at their last meeting and that the plan reflects these near term priorities. Jim Long:The educational campaign should be balanced and present both the benefits and impacts of urban renewal. VIII. Next Steps This is the last meeting for the Tigard Triangle CAC. Upcoming Urban Renewal Plan dates: o Planning Commission review—November 14,2016 o City Council hearing—December 13,2016 o Educational campaign [December 2016–March 2017] o Citywide vote—May 16,2017 There will be at least two meetings regarding the future of 72nd Ave,tentatively planned for April and June of 2017.Members interested in providing input on the future design of 72nd Ave should follow up with the City Engineer directly. Susan Shanks will provide the City Engineer's contact information by email. Meeting adjourned 7:30PM. Page 3 of 3 T vp ATTACHMENT 3 www.tvfr.com Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue November 21, 2016 City Manager Marty Wine City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re:Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Proposal Dear Ms. Wine and Members of the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency, Thank you for the opportunity to weigh in on the proposed Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. We've been pleased by the inclusive process you've conducted over the past several months. Susan Shanks has been particularly helpful,diligent and committed to a transparent community dialogue. As you know,Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue supports comprehensive planning and Tigard's economic vitality. We recognize that tax-increment financing is one tool that the city can use to spur economic development.As a fire district, however, we must safeguard the interests of our stakeholders who entrust us to be good stewards with their emergency service investments. If the proposed Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan is approved,TVF&R will lose at least $29million in foregone revenue over the next few decades. Currently,TVF&R already experiences a $1.7 million annual loss district-wide from existing municipal urban renewal areas. Based on those significant losses,we are keen to ensure that the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan consists primarily of projects such as transportation and utility infrastructure that spur private investment or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur under normal market conditions. We appreciate the revisions you've made to the plan thus far which limit projects such as city halls, fire stations, recreational centers or other public amenities which are not proven to encourage private investment, as well as increasing the threshold for amendments requiring consent versus just consultation. We approve the plan language changes the city submitted on October 13. Specifically, adding a section related to duration in Section VIII (D). -continued on page two- North Operating Center Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center 20665 SW Blanton Street and Central Operating Center 8445 SW Elligsen Road 12400 5W Tonquin Road Aloha,Oregon 11945 SW 70"'Avenue Wilsonville,Oregon Sherwood,Oregon 97078-1042 Tigard,Oregon 97223-8566 97070-9641 97140-9734 503-649-8577 503-649-8577 503-649-8577 503-259-1600 Proposed Addition to Section VIII (D): "The Agency intends to not collect tax-increment revenues for the Area after FYE 2053. The Agency shall not initiate any urban renewal projects in the Area unless the Agency reasonably projects it will be able to pay for those projects from the proceeds of indebtedness issued on or before FYE 2053, and from other funds available to the Agency. Except as provided in the next sentence, all indebtedness that is secured by the tax increment revenues of the Area shall mature no later than FYE 2053, and the Agency shall structure all its indebtedness so that it can be paid in full from the tax increment revenues of the Area that the Agency reasonably projects it will receive on or before FYE 2053. The Agency may issue refunding indebtedness that matures after FYE 2053, only if issuing that refunding indebtedness is necessary to avoid a default on previously-issued indebtedness." We also approve expanding approval requirements in Section IX(B) "Amendments to the Plan": Amendments requiring written concurrence of taxing districts imposing at least 75%of the amount of taxes imposed under permanent rate limits in the urban renewal area are amendments that: 1. Increase the maximum amount of indebtedness that can be issued or incurred under the Plan. Increasing the maximum indebtedness is also a substantial amendment, as defined above and must also meet the requirements of Section IX(A)of this Plan. 2. Extend the duration provision as defined in Section VIII(D)of the Plan. In addition to obtaining concurrence, extending the duration of the Plan requires approval of the Agency and City Council by resolution. Thank you for your efforts to address our concerns. We look forward to our continued partnership toward improving Tigard's safety and livability. Sincerely, kci,44 ---e. 1-,-;:t.k___ Chief Mike Duyck Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: December 13, 2016 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: Informational Public Hearing - AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND FINDINGS RELATING TO AND APPROVING THE TIGARD TRIANGLE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF APPROVAL BE PUBLISHED This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses ofpersons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: December 13, 2016 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses ofpersons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent-(Speaking In Favor) Opponent-(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Addres one No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Davie- (AG 60141. J� \ o0s .S i' t � jrE(gtf.(0,1, OA 71-i83 ,� t GF'4`0 So3, 310-A306 T/223 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. (im`s elm--1 K ih9-04WS PAW21' 952-9 5r /,DP1(0 1 ci NA), 012 orn23 503 lq-5409 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. SUPPL -NTA�CKE - 13 � �r EETING) I qtr 4' 00 • j+lira .., t• ri _ I • c + I , LL '"-- ).4 " 7 i . a..114. :. h '' • �+ # • 6 ,'` • ` t 1 / �T 1 .I 1 1,1 t�' .• A �" ' >$ M li • ' �, y h ` #1. %.4 Atii '1. • 4 n, - • +LI • ` Z.'14: ,',.,• ` C CZ • '... , •1, a ', 41 s/ • ! i I t�, uti .• . ‘ ,ii , , 4 \ \i, 4 JO ' ' /t •.' r • • Ik .0, o i le t. \ ,st i 1 ‘,..\ , , . tIr e. .11 ( . we; , .. vic 4, F + w / , t .I *. L' s.x �-.' . dF ,. semt ' Yv+ ' i � "b. `�` 4yjw� is lrFt yy �3' v nl , • .p -•. . ..... . ..." 12,-',... . ,k..1 ::'r-, ,. ......ft,.; k) . .:. •'..f S A. '• . OA..'"•i7 -. ~: 4. .' ,• e .. y N. o l• . , ' ',' • )* i '`:)• Mit. —` • •4i.., .,_,. .. xt` ' 'fa . ' Co - "F. •dr. . a i� �` V 0 ' . 1.• • f ,�... • ' . N •1 I !0 . s % . "1i�;ti,1 '11 ., t • ., s, J .-,43.-,43 • r •• a i. ►t •,x • 3.• 1 . .,rf,.4 - T. . , SW Gaarde ....._444116.MOMINP _ NI _ N. 11 4N 4111- 1 F 4 ,ri 6 lb v. j i IU „, 1 li. II Ili ' * Viltdo i 43 , 11111 . , , i I,- mal �.r r I 41 AMP'I 4 4. Ili r4411114. IMO .71V3110.1161--)14, t 11',A. OIL j • v , II" ir t t e r' 11260 SW Gaarde St. i hp WI,iatj r M VW t Reference Parcel #: 2S110AB 01400 s , Q 10564 1 r--- 107 05 i 74.00 f 7400 ' 7s: 261D5DD N 813DCI r 261030C p Tec , 26103DC 1S1030C 1700 .46 AC, 1300 9I 1100 ml 1500 r 1500 z 5 1 n 2 14 3 n 4 4 III 107.96 1400 7400 7400 74,00 _ _ 3K' - _ _ 8168 15x91 - EAST 24 RODS _ l4 CORNER 42802 0! 200319' 64 2001.27740 87$402 ,amu",.\\""\ \,.\\\amu \\,u\\\ G-A MI D ''.,.,\\„ \,.\» -1---R E ET ---L--- a, _ --(CR 22 2 5) -- (C \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\i : :\t\,,�\\\\\\\':':`.� ",53�: 2 -8 'q 2 2-80"486 __ _ 12.5411) 2002.68761�' 0-4-1 8i 'AA 138.70 177 ."tp li° 10671 - 10860 7 174 68.28 ;� 68.00 50.32 /9 11M 840 ---� _ 1177 N5 30.00 r ,J P=1550'i 0�1p a.'s N 400.00 . ,,) 20Ip 21 AC 4700 $' 4600 50' 4400 a 4500 - 6 AC • 111 • 12 2 1 R 1f ; 2 ^ a. k �- J7Jf' � I�a�� f 199 f 94 , r Cs 1 $ 1 ' J r p vvvv�vvv 2 LiAN j '''' 100 zpi 1600 1400 e8 7500 7000 5517 4.1. o .36 AG $ 1.82 AC n R 2.87 AC P° _ R � W z 100 �J 1 8+ 492 0(1 ,, 5000 ,, 5100 I f 2 A `- VI 4 162.60 76144 /- 2 :66,--.4-Ek?,.,Bfl70007500 ' i liFid �D RZ 3 ii8 6 a 5 ' ; 1:;-- fi6a2s-oow ss,,.. . IB �" �0s 55.82 G8.11 ,.-.- 303.70 r 20. ••688-37-30W 311100 D 4- - - -.. 11700 a o TR.A, SW JACKIE CT I 1300 , 85.71 75.00_-- 61.a-°$- S e 1700 .1e AC w; 8 1 m 5600 « 5700 21 5800 15 .55 AC 4 R // QI 9 10 pl 11 n 1200 76 p��p ;! 771 J . t .18 AC O o.,i I s \\\'-tk4'hY �� / 11700 E R cp,i 4f 1 F}� ,52.00 1100 40' 172.00 .23 AC�\ m; ryo1' IS 1800 ✓ 4/4') _. $ 28 A 3300 8 I.- .45AC 5 _$ 28AC 116 . 23-74 / ` e' ti = .23 AC 4- / rt 80.00 I 1 _. 152.60 I+ 3416 -- • P_ 215 DO-' -- - _ -. r- 14150 800 / (�� 3200 $ 0 .23 AC 000 / .63 AC -15 31008A d I a \ 1000 .248 AC 6 : n$; I 3.72 AC �� ^ S I .3B AC I� / 2 1 B00 ;; .23 AC a18 ZZ, 152.50 162.50 ' _ - • r§ /(�/ A Z 1 --I - 80E.45 1,, :q 6,100 -' 700 0 _- __ -- -�� -�- __ 1,, IX) ' ' g y i A 14 1 A 4 C � Property Information Department • First American 121 SW Morrison Street Suite 300 Portland,OR 97204 Phone:503.219.TRI0(8746) Fax:503.790.7872 -y e Title Company of Oregon Email:pid.portland@firstam.com THIS MAP IS PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE IN LOCATING PROPERTY. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF OREGON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACTUAL SURVEY SW Gaarde Street 1.92 Acres IN 1-1 1-1 S fD 3 CD CD fD 1407G 11260 11260 SW Gaarde Street Tigard, Oregon • ' 7. - Presented By: Peter Dillenburger Client Full --- rr Hasson Company illIf ' 1` } a Phone: 503 310-8194 E-mail: peterd@hasson.com q „ RESIDENTIAL Status: ACT 12/12/2016 2:55:26 PM ML#: 16684233 Area: 151 List Price: $495,000 • Addr:11260 SW GAARDE ST Unit#: `'- " s Yr i t City: Tigard Zip: 97224 Condo Loc: .s kr, w'._ „ Map Coord: Zoning: R4.5 County:Washington Tax ID:R0489420 �.,• ;. Elem: Alberta Rider Middle: + f .' `. High: Tigard PropType: DETACHD „ .' Nhood/Bldg: CC&Rs: �r�ay �` v t : `,.4 a Legal: COLE'S ACRES, LOT 1 &3, PLUS ACREAGE,ACRES 1.92 ' p° Home Energy Score: I ' a 'i Ilk '_. 55+w/Affidavit 0""=L•. t _ Home Wrnty: Y/N: N GENERAL INFORMATION Lot Size: 1-2.99AC #Acres: 1.92 Lot Dimensions: Wtfrnt: View: Lot Desc: CORNER,TREES Body Water: Seller Disc: DSCLOSUR RESIDENCE INFORMATION Upper SQFT: 0 SFSrc: Appraiser #Bdrms: 3 #Bath: 1 /1 #Lvl: 2 Year Built: 1963/ APPROX Main SQFT: 1292 TotUp/Mn: 1292 Roof: Style: DAYRNCH Green Cert: Energy Eff.: Lower SQFT: 1311 #Fireplaces: / INSERT,WOOD Parking:CARPORT,DRIVWAY Exterior: LAP Total SQFT: 2603 Addl.SQFT: #Gar: 2/ATTACHD,CARPORT Bsmt/Fnd: FULLBAS, PARTFIN REMARKS XSt/Dir: Hwy 99 to Gaarde(driveway access is on 112th) Public: Excellent development opportunity in the heart of Tigard.Almost 2 acres on the corner of SW Gaarde&112th-zoned R4.5. Also see Lots&Land listing#16646857. APPROXIMATE ROOM SIZES AND DESCRIPTIONS Living: M/24 X 13/FIREPL Mstr Bd: M/12 X 11 / Bths-Full/Part Kitchen: M/13 X 9 / 2nd Bd: M/11 X 11 / Upper Lvl: 0/0 Dining: M/10 X 9 / 3rd Bed: M/10 X 10/ Main Lvl: 1/1 Family: U 27 X 14/FIREPL SHOP: L/15 X 13/ Lower Lvl: 0/0 Total Bth: 1/1 FEATURES AND UTILITIES Kitchen: BI-MICO,DISHWAS, FS-RANG Interior: LAUNDRY,VNYL-FL,WW-CARP Exterior: TL-SHED,YARD Accessibility: MNBDBTH Cool: Heat: FOR-AIR Water: PUBLIC Sewer: PUBLIC Hot Water: Fuel: GAS FINANCIAL PTax/Yr: $4,145.66 Rent, If Rented: Short Sale:N Bank Owned/REO:N HOA:N Dues: Other Dues: HOA Incl: List Date 11/16/2016 COMPARABLE INFORMATION 0/Price: $495,000 ©RMLSTM 2016.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.-INFORMATION NOT GUARANTEED AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED. SQUARE FOOTAGE IS APPROXIMATE&MAY INCLUDE BOTH FINISHED&UNFINISHED AREAS-CONSULT BROKER FOR INFO. SCHOOL AVAILABILITY SUBJECT TO CHANGE. Jif ' .� ! j '• • 11= CU al 1 11It . _ 0 = o • mom ■ yam J- N a ■� '� - • .e 1 fI •4t ; CZ I , k _ L NI 600. ,.., _gum _ — cr.13L cgi WS }r, , ., �. .'� ' .'rni te■ CD= __ •.vim I , ' ' /� /t6 . t .. t , l F a z LT� z9 o N N.1.1 COQ cn Li., " ` �� H�T •�.._ GENEVA 5 ` - .._... I m c , Ns,...„.. \ I WI L ao I ) ANTON DR MANZANITA ST %\moi _� < Ilia mI Q cro t , t .1_:. 1 I I I I I AKOTA ST I • •- I L . .\,Q = < 3• W � [`\ ,QO Q UMFRW000 p0. I)1I r.0 VEI RCT ' ( I , I I h mP i• firpark V MILLVIEW CT B RLHEIGHT,F, > TDR c < < < F\E�R CIR au SUMMER ST P�t,P . ` �"y F = o s 11841 i IIIIII 3�"S DR L /; .`--�a 1,i I I TIGARD STI _ 1C� • C , 11'INT Ke DR\ r< . (..] r'_"�-.See Enlarged Map on Ba Dirksen ( PH"ST`. Nature \\. Tigard o Mary WoodwardPark Plaza 3o 'LOOP FALCON 0.\SE DR Elementary . _ T r� WILTON AV ,+. 1 �Cq ,Z ORNING N DR KATHERINE ST '0 +1910. \ , \ '- �THERINE ST ` OLN PJyc © f' o , (\ *I YNNs ,nc,mas j l p� Yl�l `C Tiir � FM', 20 Thi/ -Windmill 01 » 441\ _ ANN ST M�orl!� •• TL .0 44 DR N k Parr E .__J • • p" ."R. • \ KW)/ A BOUNE St', Pli'lP141 VY 4.7.41\ t TC •-14,4/ Lt c )0 WALNUT LN N I i ..nt • S •_n .,l '` —T W = ERROL STS _ >11 \ \' A'Shue ti < _ J• P3. Echo — * 7CJ' ��� © / • f o� \ 3 Q _ p2 L F e A�`` Par CARMEN 5T o \`L, P F.Si arfl 10, r 3 �' o _. FONNER•T?el Eleme(y,�ar yA`,• • ON ALBERTA ST EL ON ?� v R 'rT dirt �, r -sem , '- r '.,w,c0- f� '�Griff 88 4 Memo �� 2GtN' l JAMES ST ... •_ •/0 RY DELL CT CyO._ �s�7\1' \\� TIGARDCITY S kail WE E • (o .., moi _ / \ �•02 F OBJ % .H\� I�lSTRIDG o , MARION ST 0•`. ARS.C. m NES\Si p pd• 'HOLLOW LN �OO� '� OOr x > \ Pna •;. v ,3R N O I- COOK LN < tel' A OP , /GLENN O' .J i1 " „"+W PJ�EW WAY I I ;I� triiimm�L CRE O T Q 'f..e 00 PU I k IA F 'P 1 ---.• lit O `\,0P `e.'''." C,E -• FAIRHAVEN ST 3 � rP - F� • nMt TALI. s„� ^IW, • i ;C zEB ryl` S\'` ,F,P �\ .° r '(ERSL00 x FA\aNAVEN WAY 4 F. ,,s-,„.4 `�� `�.Nt 4 r c Ry W LN \ c y �� EDGEWOOD ST J\ \/ � t ” ES-•'''' / I GARDEN PARK PL OEO `s0a • '� L J Gaarde �� HILLVIEW ST l ( 1 l4� PLANTATION E • Christian\\ :ull W10Uflf :r�` I♦ S1 Anthony tft L -^� Park i, SIII•:■ - Cemetery .�, M. I •• B I )R DR tip MOS WILMINGT � �� ,MEM IlLr.x iv ,./ G _� [0 L IN S n < i O C) < JANZEN CT ELR $t ' „f‘ 3 -' 1 ,~i. ^ = • o'er 1FTl _ ij 6 LROSE CT J hDLER DR ' I or o F f MOUNTAIN VIEW L .e = DUCNILLY CT if • a a 74,.. CE 0 MCFARLAND BLVD pD L > -!h �. 0.oVO T < _ , GREEASWARD LH'- ' D _� la ' ` VIEW TER k I I ( . �, VIEW TER a < EI12; �5 _ WILDWpO� / INEZ ST I'J ( !m Pr - • �� r, _ T .� ® ANTERBURr L TWalit •�, I �r . Tigerd PEMBROOKST• vanelical ®© � feY I I I \I BgTTE .. ELEMAR CT /Cemetery -mage James PINEBRO K ST f / �''" WINTERY' DR _.�r<--r- I F �\ Templeton , ' a i i Elementary ;/ + ' i � I i ^k'DOD DR VIEWCREST CT o o : - e K DR O/ C ^ SPP I ASPEN RIP \ DEL MONTE DR' '.• LESLIE( RE �q.G > 1 r u ` ST 4 = CR" I„, I HAZEL T Y{I 1 //-�1 L ON Dft F HOME ST o F = AIS-2860 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Public Hearing for City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Business Informational Meeting - Main Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Should Council approve the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment and refer it to the voters for adoption? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Review and discuss the proposed City Center Urban Renewal Plan Fourth Amendment 2. Take testimony on the Plan Amendment 3. Vote to approve the Plan Amendment 4. Direct staff to prepare a ballot title for the May 2017 election KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Center Urban Renewal district does not have the financial capacity originally estimated when approved by voters in 2006. The urban renewal financial analysis, done prior to the Great Recession of 2008, projected that $22 million in tax increment would be generated by 2026. The recession greatly reduced growth in property values and development. Current estimates are that the current district will generate about $6 million less tax increment than originally projected. Without new resources, there will be insufficient funds for several City Center Urban Renewal Plan projects. At the direction of the City Center Development Agency Board, staff worked with consultants to prepare a draft Substantial Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to expand the boundary of the Area. The proposed expanded district would allow for the collection of tax increment revenue closer to the value envisioned for the urban renewal district over its life. State law ORS 457.220(3) limits increases to the size of an urban renewal district to 20% of its original size. The City Center Urban Renewal District is 191.22 acres. It can be increased 38.24 acres in size. This Plan Amendment adds 37.70 acres and increases its financial capacity by $2.8 million. The City Center Advisory Commission has been briefed on the Plan Amendment and voted to recommend approval at its October meeting. The Plan Amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Report on the Fourth Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (Report) is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Public Notice A notice for this meeting was sent to voters in Tigard on November 29, 2016, and was placed on the City of Tigard website. Process The process for approval has included the following steps, in accordance with ORS 457. 1. The Plan Amendment was reviewed by the City Center Advisory Commission, the Citizens Advisory Council and the Technical Advisory Committee during in October. The Plan Amendment was also presented at an open house held on October 20, 2016. 2. On October 4, 2016 the Tigard City Center Development Agency reviewed the proposed Plan Amendment and accompanying Report and recommended to forward it to City Council for adoption. 3. The Tigard Planning Commission reviewed the Plan Amendment on November 14, 2016 and voted unanimously that the Plan Amendment conformed to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, recommending that the City Council adopt the Plan Amendment and accompanying Report. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are attached hereto as Exhibit C. 4. Notice of the Council public hearing was provided by mailing to all voters on November 29, 2016. 5. A letter with the proposed Plan Amendment and the Report was sent to the governing body of each taxing district on October 5, 2016. 6. The Plan Amendment was presented to the Washington County Commission on October 18, 2016. 7. The hearing by City Council and adoption of the proposed Plan Amendment and accompanying Report by a non-emergency ordinance will be held on December 13, 2016 and the vote on the ordinance will be on the same date. 8. Vote by Tigard voters is currently anticipated to be held on May 16, 2017. Ordinance Adopting the Plan Amendment The ordinance adopting the Plan Amendment requires the City Council make certain findings, which are listed in Section 1 of the ordinance. These findings are based on various documents and events. The findings are as follows: 1. The process for the adoption of the proposed Plan Amendment, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and by this reference incorporated herein, has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes; As described in Section IV above, the City has followed the procedures as outlined by ORS 457. 2. The area designated in the Plan Amendment as the Area is blighted, as defined by ORS 457.010(1) and is eligible for inclusion within the Plan Amendment because of conditions described in Section II of the Report including inadequate streets, trails, sidewalks, parks, and utilities, and a prevalence of depreciated values resulting from underdevelopment and underutilization of property within the Area; This is the basic justification for the Plan Amendment and the Council's finding is meant to make that justification explicit. 3. The rehabilitation and redevelopment described in the Plan Amendment to be undertaken by the Agency is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the City because absent the completion of the urban renewal projects, the Area will fail to contribute its fair share of property tax revenues to support City services and will fail to develop and/or redevelop according to the goals of the comprehensive plan; This finding states the public purpose of the Plan Amendment which is for the property in the Area to develop and redevelop according to the Comprehensive Plan. Property which is not developed or not fully developed and occupied does not contribute as much propery taxes as fully developed property. The improvement of proper0 in the Area will add to the tax base in the Area and further support additional economic activity in the Area. 4. The Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as a whole, and provides an outline for accomplishing the projects described in the Plan Amendment, as more fully described in Section VI of the Plan Amendment; This finding is supported by Section VI of the Plan Amendment and the Planning Commission's conclusion that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are attached hereto as Exhibit C. 5. In connection with any residential displacement occurring as a result of the acquisition and disposition of land, provision has been made for displaced persons in the Relocation Section of the Report as required under applicable state and federal law; The Plan Amendment does not contemplate acquisition of propery that would displace residents or businesses. Should the Plan Amendment be amended to include such acquisition, the Agency would be obligated to provide relocation assistance. 6. The acquisition of real property provided for in the Plan, including real property in the area that is the subject of this Plan Amendment, is necessary for the development of infrastructure improvements including parking improvements in the Area, for the development of public spaces and for assisting in private redevelopment of the Area; The Plan authorizes acquisition of real propery for infrastructure improvements, including in the area that is the subject of this Plan Amendment. No propery is specifically identified for acquisition in this Plan Amendment. 7. Adoption and carrying out the Plan Amendment is economically sound and feasible in that funds are available to complete the Plan Amendment projects using urban renewal tax increment revenues derived from a division of taxes pursuant to section 1c, Article IX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457.440, and other available funding as shown in Sections V, VI, VII, and VIII of the Report; The Report contains information on the projected revenues and projected expenditures under the Plan Amendment and supports a finding that the Plan Amendment is economically sound and feasible. 8. The City of Tigard shall assume and complete activities prescribed to it by the Plan Amendment; The Plan Amendment does not prescribe any specific activities to the City. 9. The Agency consulted and conferred with affected overlapping taxing districts prior to the Plan Amendment being forwarded to the City Council. The Agency sent a copy of the Plan Amendment and the Report to the affected overlapping taxing districts on October 5, 2016. These taxing districts included the City of Tigard, Tigard Tualatin School District, Northwest Regional Education Service District, Portland Community College, Port of Portland, Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue, Metro, Washington County, and the Tigard Tualatin Aquatic District. The letter included an invitation to provide comments in writing on the Plan Amendment and Report on the Amendment. To date, the City has not received written recommendations from the affected taxing districts. If such recommendations are received, the Council will be required to `accept, r ject or mod "the recommendations and language to that effect will be added to the ordinance for its second reading and adoption The ordinance also calls for publication of a notice that the Council has adopted the ordinance, for the recording of the Plan Amendment by the Washington County Clerk and for transmitting the Plan Amendment to the Washington County Assessor. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council may suggest revisions to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment or could chose not to refer it to the voters. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Tigard City Council 2015-17 Goals and Milestones Goal #2. Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tigard Comprehensive Plan Special Planning Areas- Downtown Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village. City Strategic Plan Goal 1: Facilitate walking connections to develop an identity. City Strategic Plan Goal 2: Ensure development advances the vision. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION October 4, 2016: CCDA Initiate the public review process for the draft Substantial Amendment of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan and accompanying report. September 20, 2016: Discuss Adoption Process for Substantial Amendment to Downtown City Center Urban Renewal Plan May 3, 2016 : Discuss Potential Substantial Amendment to City Center Urban Renewal Plan. Fiscal Impact Cost: $557,528 Budgeted (yes or no): yes Where Budgeted (department/program): General Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: The estimated impact to the City of Tigard's general fund is $557,528 between the years 2019 and 2034. However this impact was anticipated by the adoption of the original City Center Urban Renewal Plan in 2006. Attachments Ordinance Exhbit A-Plan Amendment Exhibit B-Report Accompanying Plan Amendment Exhibit C-Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND FINDINGS RELATING TO AND APPROVING THE TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF APPROVAL BE PUBLISHED WHEREAS, the Tigard City Center Development Agency (the "Agency"), as the duly authorized and acting urban renewal agency of the City of Tigard,Oregon,is proposing to undertake certain urban renewal activities in a designated area within the City pursuant to ORS Chapter 457;and WHEREAS,the Agency,pursuant to the requirements of ORS Chapter 457,has caused the preparation of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Plan Amendment"). The Plan Amendment authorizes certain urban renewal activities within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area (the"Area");and WHEREAS, the Agency has caused the preparation of a certain Urban Renewal Report dated December 13, 2016,attached hereto as Exhibit B (the"Report") to accompany the Plan Amendment as required under ORS 457.085(3);and WHEREAS, the Agency forwarded the Plan Amendment and Report to the City's Planning Commission (the "Commission") for review and recommendation. The Commission considered the Plan Amendment and Report on November 14, 2016 and made a recommendation that the Plan Amendment conformed with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,attached hereto as Exhibit C (the"Planning Commission Minutes");and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2016, representatives of the City met with the Washington County Board of Commissioners to review the Plan Amendment, including proposed maximum indebtedness for the Plan Amendment;and WHEREAS,the Plan Amendment and the Report were forwarded on October 5,2016 to the governing body of each taxing district affected by the Plan Amendment,and the Agency has therefore consulted and conferred with each taxing district;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council (the"City Council") has not received written recommendations from the governing bodies of the affected taxing districts;and WHEREAS,on November 29,2016 the City caused notice of the hearing to be held before the Council on the Plan Amendment,including the required statements of ORS 457.120(3),to be mailed to registered voters within Tigard's incorporated limits;and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016 the City Council held a public hearing to review and consider the Plan Amendment, the Report, the recommendation of the Tigard Planning Commission, and the public testimony received on or before that date and to receive additional public testimony; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the record presented through this date, the City Council does by this Ordinance desire to approve the Plan Amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 1 SECTION 1: The Plan Amendment complies with all requirements of ORS Chapter 457 and the specific criteria of 457.095(1) through (7),in that,based on the information provided in the Report, the Planning Commission Recommendation, and the public testimony before the City Council: 1. The process for the adoption of the Plan Amendment, has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes; 2. The area designated in the Plan Amendment as the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area is blighted,as defined by ORS 457.010(1) and is eligible for inclusion within the Plan Amendment because of conditions described in the Report in the Section "Existing Physical, Social, and Economic Conditions and Impacts on Municipal Services",including the existence of inadequate streets,trails, sidewalks,parks, and utilities,and a prevalence of depreciated values resulting from underdevelopment and underutilization of property within the Area (ORS 457.010(1)(e)and(g); 3. The rehabilitation and redevelopment described in the Plan Amendment to be undertaken by the Agency is necessary to protect the public health,safety or welfare of the City because absent the completion of urban renewal projects, the Area will fail to contribute its fair share of property tax revenues to support City services and will fail to develop and/or redevelop according the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 4. The Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and documented ancillary documents and provides an outline for accomplishing the projects described in the Plan Amendment, as more fully described in the Plan Amendment and in the Planning Commission recommendation; 5. No residential displacement will occur as a result of the acquisition and disposition of land and redevelopment activities proposed in the Plan Amendment and therefore the Plan Amendment does not include provisions to house displaced persons; 6. The acquisition of real property provided in the Plan,including real property in the area that is the subject of this Plan Amendment, is necessary for the development of transportation-related infrastructure improvements in the Area and for the development of public spaces because the Agency does not own all the real property interests (e.g., rights- of-way, easements, fee ownership, etc.) that will be required to undertake and complete these projects as described in Chapter W of the Plan Amendment and Section V of the Report;and 7. Adoption and carrying out the Plan Amendment is economically sound and feasible in that eligible projects and activities will be funded by urban renewal tax revenues derived from a division of taxes pursuant to section ic,Article IX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457.440 and other available funding as more fully described in the Sections V,VI,VII, and VIII of the Report; 8. The City shall assume and complete any activities prescribed it by the Plan Amendment; and 9. The Agency consulted and conferred with affected overlapping taxing districts prior to the Plan Amendment being forwarded to the City Council. ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 2 SECTION 2: The Tigard Urban Renewal Plan Amendment is hereby approved based upon review and consideration by the Tigard City Council of the Plan Amendment and Report,the Tigard Planning Commission recommendations,each of which is hereby accepted,and the public testimony in the record. SECTION 3: The City Manager shall forward forthwith to the Agency a copy of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: The Agency shall thereafter cause a copy of the Plan Amendment to be recorded in the Records of Washington County,Oregon. SECTION 5: The City Manager,in accordance with ORS 457.115,shall publish notice of the adoption of the Ordinance approving the Plan Amendment induding the provisions of ORS 457.135,in the Tigard Times no later than four days following adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 6: This ordinance shall be effective upon certification by the County Elections Official that it has received voter approval at an election conducted on ,2017. PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of ,2016. Carol A. Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2016. John L.Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 3 Attachment A Proposed new text is shown in double-underline. Deleted text is shown in atrikcthrough. Explanatory language shown in italics. CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN Only changes shown, current plan can be viewed at: http://www.tigard-or.gov/document center/CommunityDevelopment/urban renewal plan.pdf I. Introduction The Plan has a duration of 20 years(see Chapter XI), meaning that no new debt will be incurred after Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The maximum amount of indebtedness(amount of tax increment financing for projects and programs)that may be issued for the Plan is Twenty- Two Million Dollars and No Cents($22,000,000). The first substantial amendment was developed in 2016 and went to voters in the May 2017 election. It amended the boundary and updated the plan as needed. II. Goals and Objectives No changes to this section III. Outline of projects No changes to this section IV. Map and Legal Description of Urban Renewal Area Map and Legal Description are replaced in their entirety. IV. MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL AREA FIGURE 1. SHOWS THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA BOUNDARIES. EXHIBIT A. IS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA. .... , . - — ,,,, , • .7r •• • • ..,.. ..., . . . _ . ., . ... , . I • •*., ' ' • — .,.- rt•-•• •t? • ' If -• `A... , i--.Lti . • i 00 it _.\\:::\N__ i 1.— - - ,--- -r & POINT OF BEGINNING 'a .,-0-• - lc-- - 0 ., —...,,,, , V " ., „. • 7..... ' .. • . * .. • 'C. -', • • ' . .— ,.-41.‘. , 4 '- ***....?- .,..'• - % ,,,'..) ia ' t ',1r- If r _ , ' 4t.' • z ''' A.4 r L. ..-'"- s e '7•4Wr1. , 4.,,•d., , 4, ot . ,A"W tie * -"•",. 4 : 'i,''''''',. . .:, ‘ Atilf- , . •' 'fr A '•>, , ;AA ,• ' /Irr*i• il• /ik • ' 8', 4• iote , . s • \ ,_7 ' 4.- ‘ la ? -.• .' ; ' • • . Nx. ,„ ' • ''." • • le A ' 4 • .• • s '' • N .,' .I% 's ...1 P. AWC‘ '''` 1' . 1 VP , . ,',• 'IR f'‘',., r . 14 ., ‘ ._,ew ... v.. \\\\ \. , IIIP it , .. .. , . . .. ..,, .• ,, _ s , . .., , ..„../..,...,.. . , i 4.. . , .. • ..,.. irk •,, • . 410,. ,...,, 's' ': A t N1110 4, • • 4%* • / ../ foxy .• ,X.0•.411. .4"40./- - '' i . A j • . s/' • • • '/le \\ \'‘" A NN„ 4°.;-... ' .;.•, N.. ,.., „,.. ......... ... , x, , t ,•• - ,- ...,,,, . • - • -;--• it- .• • . \ ,-...„ . , #4, , ,.1. ,- •- . ,-N.,-\\\,, :. \.„, ,.. .... .. ,- . ' ,,,s„,.. ia., .• \ ...„, 1, •,,, .4• , ... , del,... t 400,/ s: -,.a ,,,,,,,'"---1.1„:„ \_,:::::::. --/•.„4,,,,;,.,,:-...,:,-.,4,,, NoT, ,„..,... d • -t'7 e *4, IF ger ,i , .. . .4 al4* 0,..• •.., . 4,,,, \ , 44,- , • Ji , \* .i. - • t. s. 0. • 4' 111. .. \ s ' . • 1 , - ._ T ''', II 4r rt • - ' 1111.11 4/- ,,, •AmEts ,-, \ It ,, • IP , lit ' .• „ I . •• . • • 41' , - FIGURE 1. EXHIBIT A CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in Section 35 Township 1 South,Range 1 West and Sections 1 and 2 Township 2 South,Range 1 West Willamette Meridian City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly right-of-way of SW Greenburg Road with the southeast line of the John L. Hinklin DLC;thence N 07°41' 55" W a distance of 100.77 feet to the north right-of-way of SW Greenburg Road;thence N 10° 32' 02"E a distance of 419.98 feet; thence S 88° 04' 51"E a distance of 168.91 feet;thence N 46° 34' 35"E a distance of 73.95 feet; thence S 85°47' 11 E a distance of 190.07 feet; S 02° 45' 30" W a distance of 72.32 feet;thence N 75° 18' 06"E a distance of 36.45 feet;thence N 46° 48' 53"E a distance of 173.62 feet; thence N 64° 02" 12"E a distance of 177.40 feet to the westerly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd.; thence N 36° 35' 04"E a distance of 83.84 feet to the easterly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd.; thence N 64° 31' 19"E a distance of 148.06 feet;thence S 26° 03' 02"E a distance of 160.00 feet;thence N 64° 17' 30"E 148.04 feet to the southerly right-of-way of Highway 217;thence S 35° 21' 18"E, along said highway, a distance of 171.44 feet;thence S 42° 33' 04"E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 99.48 feet;thence S 26° 55' 45"E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 225.54 feet to the northerly right of way of Highway 99 W;thence S 33° 05' 43"E,to the southerly right-of-way of Highway 99 W and the west line of Highway 217 a distance of 127.63 feet;thence S 18° 46' 14"E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 157.53 feet; thence N 79° 41' 28"E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 57.29 feet to an angle point on an offset spiral curve;thence along said right-of-way, S 33°44' 44"E a distance of 221.73 feet(spiral curve chord);thence S 52° 02' 57"E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 315.25 feet;thence S 41° 09' 43"E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 302.54 feet;thence S 33° 34' 36"E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 703.90 feet to the north line of the Wm. Graham D.L.C. and the southeast corner of Lot 2 Crow Park 217; thence N 81° 39' 34"W, along the south line of Crow Park 217, a distance of 963.07 feet to the northwest corner of said Wm. Graham D.L.C. and an angle point in said Lot 2;thence N 79° 02' 14" W, along said south line of Crow Park 217, a distance of 506.40 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 1 Knoll Acres; thence S 00°42' 32"W, along the easterly line of Lots 1,2, 3, &4 Knoll Acres, a distance of 407.90 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 5 Knoll Acres; thence S 30° 16' 07" W, along the easterly line of said Lot 5, a distance of 149.08 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Hunziker Street;thence S 48°40' 12"W a distance of 85.64 feet to the intersection of the southerly right-of-way of SW Hunziker Street with the easterly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd.;thence N89° 25' 34"E, along the southerly right-of-way of SW Hunziker Street, 27.85 feet to an angle point;thence S 59° 29' 34" E a distance of 261.39 feet to the west line of Deed Doc.No. 89-14950, Washington County Deed Records (as depicted on SN 25,383);thence S 30° 30' 24" W,along last said west line a distance of 216.56 feet;thence N 59° 28' 54"W a distance of 120.00 feet; thence N 30° 27' 59" E a distance of 100.00 feet;thence N 59° 29' 34" W a distance of 133.60 feet; thence N 89° 17' 28" W a distance of 24.63 feet to the center line of SW Hall Blvd;thence along the center line of SW Hall Blvd.the following nine(9)courses;thence S 00°42' 32" W a distance of 35.34 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 163.70 feet, a central angle of 44° 01' 33" (a chord which bears S 22° 43' 19" W, 122.71 feet) and a length of 125.79 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 44° 44' 05"W a distance of 455.02 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the left;thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 179.05 feet, a central angle of 42° 08' 24"(a chord which bears S 23° 39' 53"W, 128.74 feet) and a length of 131.69 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 02° 35' 41" W a distance of 510.56 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the left;thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 190.99 feet, a central angle of 40° 59' 58" (a chord which bears S 17° 54' 18"E, 133.77 feet) and a length of 136.67 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 38° 24' 17"E a distance of 62.89 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the right;thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 190.99 feet, a central angle of 40° 07' 28" (a chord which bears S 18° 20' 33" W, 131.03 feet) and a length of 133.75 feet to a point of tangency;thence S 01°43' 11"W a distance of 704.79 feet;thence N 88° 16' 45" W a distance of 35.01 feet to the northeast corner of Parcel 1 Partition Plat 1992-069 on the westerly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd;thence along the northerly and westerly lines of said Partition Plat the following 7 courses;thence N 19° 59' 47" W a distance of 36.96 feet;thence N 77° 33' 03" W a distance of 39.55 feet;thence N 68° 35' 31" W a distance of 63.16 feet;thence S 89° 17' 05" W a distance of 56.25 feet; thence N 81° 13' 33"W a distance of 92.73 feet;thence S 36° 40' 28" W a distance of 116.84 feet;thence S 57° 58' 03" W a distance of 43.20 feet;thence N 77° 47' 58" W a distance of 110.95 feet;thence S 02° 30' 20" W a distance of 422.27 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Omara Street;thence N 87° 45' 14"W, along the northerly right-of-way, a distance of 19.65 feet; thence S 03° 57' 44"W, along the westerly right-of-way of SW Omara Street a distance of 24.61 feet and a point on a non-tangent curve to the right;thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 145.90, a central angle of 67° 12' 06" (a chord which bears N 28° 27' 10"W, 161.48 feet)and a length of 171.12 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 05° 09'15"E a distance of 10.48 feet;thence N 87° 56' 13"W a distance of 189.71 feet to the west line of Chelsea Hill;thence N 05° 09' 16"E, along the easterly line of Chelsea Hill a distance of 219.78 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 10 Chelsea Hill;thence N 64° 24' 41"W, along the northerly line of said Lot 10, a distance of 74.22 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 10;thence S 49° 33' 17" W, along the westerly line of said Lot 10, a distance of 89.36 feet to the south west corner of said Lot 10 and a point on a non- tangent curve to the left;thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 140.02,a central angle of 73° 14' 45" (a chord which bears N 77° 04' 28" W, 167.06 feet) and a length of 179.00 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 27 Chelsea Hill;thence N 60° 54' 15" W, along the easterly line of said Lot 27, a distance of 149.70 feet to the northeast corner;thence S 76° 32' 45" W, along the northerly line of Lots 27 and 28 Chelsea Hill, a distance of 90.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 27 being on the northerly line of Chelsea Hill No. 2;thence N 41°41' 53"W a distance of 365.61 feet to the southeasterly line of Duck Creek Homes;thence along the southeasterly and the northeasterly line of Duck Creek Homes the following 5 courses;thence N 44° 27' 43"E a distance of 50.76 feet;thence N 25° 06' 01"W a distance of 73.15 feet;thence N 05° 03' 58" E a distance of 40.00 feet;thence N 66° 13' 57"E a distance of 18.50 feet;thence N 42° 08' 14" W a distance of 112.77 feet to the northwest corner of Duck Creek Homes;thence N 44° 27' 43"E a distance of 20.57 feet;thence N 45° 36' 55"W a distance of 359.09 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way of SW Ash Avenue;thence S 44° 27' 43" W, along said northwesterly right-of-way of SW Ash Avenue,a distance of 258.18 feet to the southwest line of Lot 9 Burnham Tract;thence N 42° 08' 14" W a distance of 380.48 feet to the most westerly corner of said Lot 9;thence N 50° 24' 52"E, along the northwest line of said Lot 9, a distance of 143.90 feet;thence N 42° 59' 15"W a distance of 821.63 feet,more or less,to the southeasterly right-of-way of SW Main Street, being a point on a non-tangent curve to the right;thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 1,870.00 feet, a central angle of 6° 35' 46"(a chord which bears N 55° 58' 35"E,215.15 feet) and a length of 215.28 feet;thence N 59° 16' 28"E, along said southeasterly right-of-way, a distance of 202.32 feet to a point of non-tangent curve to the left;thence along said right-of-way and said curve to the left with a radius of 180.29 feet, a central angle of 19°44' 52"(a chord which bears N 78° 43' 27"E, 61.83 feet)and a length of 62.14 feet; thence N 52°43' 34" W a distance of 231.87 feet to the intersection point of the northwesterly right-of-way of HWY 99 W with the northerly right-of-way of SW Johnson Street; thence N 55° 27' 12"W,along said northerly right-of-way of SW Johnson Street, a distance of 219.79 feet to the northwest line of Lot 53,Amended Plat of North Tigardville Addition;thence N 42° 05' 45"E, along said northwest line of Lot 53, a distance of 645.17 feet to the westerly line of a Greenway Dedication as per Document No. 92014958, Washington County Deed Records;thence along said westerly line of Greenway Dedication the following four courses; thence S 32° 56' 44"E a distance of 40.58 feet;thence S 03° 52' 52"E a distance of 85.60 feet; thence S 0° 32' 56"E a distance of 59.64 feet; and thence S 07° 33' 33"E a distance of 151.19 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way of HWY 99 W; thence along said northwesterly right-of- way of HWY 99 W the following 5 courses;thence N 44° 08' 14"E a distance of 48.33 feet; thence N 07° 33' 33" W a distance of 27.78 feet;thence N 46° 23' 16"E a distance of 366.71 feet;thence N 49° 49' 08" E a distance of 29.37 feet;thence N 51°23' 28"E a distance of 295.46 feet to the southerly right-of-way of SW Tigard Street;thence N 62° 37' 00" W,along the southerly right of way of SW Tigard Street, a distance of 20.82 feet;thence N 46° 55' 01"E, along the southerly right of way of SW Tigard Street, a distance of 11.00 feet to a point 20.00 feet south of the center line of SW Tigard Street;thence N 49° 55' 59" W, parallel with and 20.00 feet from the center line of SW Tigard Street(when measured at right angles), a distance of 99.33 feet; thence N 62° 33' 24" W, parallel with and 20.00 feet from the center line of SW Tigard Street(when measured at right angles), a distance of 820.72 feet to a point at the extension of the westerly right-of-way; thence N 36° 24' 01"E a distance of 240.58 feet to the point of intersection of the northerly right-of-way of SW Commercial Street, 30.00 feet from the center line of SW Commercial Street(when measured at right angles),with the extension of the westerly right-of-way of SW 95th Ave;thence S 62° 32' 35"E,parallel with and 30.00 feet from the centerline of SW Commercial Street(when measured at right angles), a distance of 594.81 feet to the east right-of-way of SW Lincoln Avenue to a point on a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 9.49 feet, a central angle of 100° 21' 02"(a chord which bears S 14° 53' 25"E, 14.57 feet; and a length of 16.61 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Commercial Street;thence S 61°24' 10"E, along said northerly right-of-way, a distance of 187.19 feet;thence S 55° 11' 17"E, along said northerly right-of-way, a distance of 54.14 feet; thence S 51°43' 30"E, along said northerly right-of-way, a distance of 153.60 feet to the southeast line of the John L. Hinklin DLC;thence N 46° 44' 38"E, along said Hinklin DLC line, a distance of 1204.91 feet to point of beginning. Total area equals 231 acres, more or less. V. Urban Renewal Projects No changes to this section VI. Relationship to Local Objectives B. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies (Comprehensive Plan has been updated since original City Center Urban Renewal Plan adoption) Policy 3.1.2 The City Shall: a. Protect fish and wildlife habitat along stream corridors by managing the Policy 3.5.1 The City shall encourage private enterprise and intergovernmental agreements - • •.. .. . . . - , . - - . resources. Policy 3.5.3 The City has designated the 100 Year Floodplain of Fanno Creek, its tributaries, Pelicy 3.5.1 City. Policy 3.7.1 and culturally significant structure, site,objects and districts within Tigard. NATURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC AREAS. Goal 5.1:Protect natural resources and the environmental and ecological functions they provide,and to the extent feasible,restore natural resources to create naturally functioning .ystems and high levels of biodiversity. Policy 7: The City shall protect and restore riparian and upland habitats to the maximum extent feasible on public and private lands. Goal 5.2:Promote the preservation and protection of historically and culturally significant resources. The Plan identifies Parks, Public Spaces and Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities projects, including but not limited to the Fanno Park Improvements, Urban Creek/Green Corridor and Urban Green Spaces projects, which will further the Comprehensive Plan's Natural Areas policy objectives. In addition to preserving and upgrading existing parks and natural areas such as Fanno Creek Park,the Plan will facilitate the creation of"green" amenities and pedestrian/bicycle facilities that will provide new active and passive recreational opportunities for residents,downtown workers and visitors and improve connectivity between downtown and adjacent neighborhoods. Policy 5.1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. Policy 5.3 The City shall improve and enhance the portions of the central business district as the focal point for commercial,high density residential,business,civic and professional activity creating a diversified and economically viable core arm. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Goal 9.1:Develop and maintain a strong, diversified,and sustainahle local economy. Folic 1 Th• .4 •.t••lisp tr•te•ies t• retain •n• - •.r!'• • • o th • existing businesses. Policy 5: The City shall promote well-designed and efficient development and redevelopment of vacant and underutilized industrial and commercial lands. One of the Plan's stated goals is to"Promote high quality development of retail, office and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape,transportation, recreation and open space investments."The Plan identifies intersection improvements, such as the Hall Blvd/99 W Intersection Improvements project, road widening and realignment projects and other street projects that will improve circulation and access in and around downtown. In addition,the Plan authorizes streetscape projects and pedestrian/bicycle improvements that will make downtown safer and more accessible to pedestrians and bicyclists by filling in gaps in the existing sidewalk system, providing new or upgraded bike lanes, and establishing new multiuse trails and pedestrian crossings. Finally,the Plan includes parks, public spaces and public facilities projects that will make downtown a more appealing place to do business and facilitate the transition of existing industrial and auto-oriented uses to locations outside of the Central Business District. Policy 6.1.1 residential types at various prices and rent levels. HOUSING Goal 10.1:Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. Policy 1: The City shall adopt and maintain land use policies. codes. and standards that provide opportunities to develop a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences. and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. Policy 5: The City shall provide for high and medium density housing in areas such as town centers (Downtown). regional centers (Washington Square), and along transit corridors where employment opportunities, commercial services, transit, and other public services necessary to support higher population densities are either present or planned for in the In addition to financing the programs described in Section IV,the Plan includes public improvements projects that will make the Area a more attractive and viable location for new,high quality medium- and high-density residential development in downtown Tigard. Policy 8.1.1 the livability of Tigard by: pedestrian routes. Policy 8.1.2 modes)by: pedestrian,bicycle,transit,truck and auto use; arterial and collector streets in Tigard. Development adjacent to transit routes consistent with the Bicycle Master Plan. All schools, parks, public facilities and retail areas shall strive to have direct access to a bikeway; d. Construction of sidewalks on all streets within Tigard. All schools, parks, e. Development of bicycle and pedestrian plans which link to recreational trails; f. Design local streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by providing connectivity and limiting out of direction travel and provide connectivity to activity centers and destinations with a priority for bicycle and pedestrian ,.tind o o s; h. Tigard will support the development of a commuter rail system as part of the regional transit network. Policy 8.1.3 Strive to achieve a safe transportation system by the development of street standards,access management policies and speed controls when constructing program of engineering, education and enforcement. b. Design safe and secure pedestrian and bikeways between parks and other activity centers in Tigard. Policy 8.1.5 Develop transportation facilities which arc accessible to all members of the community and minimize out of direction travel by: a. The design and construction of transportation facilities to meet the b. The development of neighborhood and local connections to provide adequate circulation in and out of the neighborhoods. Policy 8.2.1 The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Policy 8.3.1 The City shall coordinate with Tri met to provide for a public transit system a. Meets the needs of both the current and projected, for the Tigard community; b. Addresses the special needs of a transit dependent population; c. Reduces pollution and traffic; and d. Reduces energy consumption. Policy 8.3.2 The City shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by: Locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways;and c. Supporting efforts by Tri met and other groups to provide for the needs of the Policy 8.5.1 The City shall locate bicycle/pedestrian corridors in a manner which provides for pedestrian and bicycle users, safe and convenient movement in all parts of the City,by developing the pathway system shown on the adopted TRANSPORTATION Goa112.3:Provide an accessible, multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. Policy 4: The City shall support and prioritize bicycle, pedestrian, and transit improvements for transportation disadvantaged populations who may be dependent on travel modes other than private automobile. Policy 6: The City shall require development adjacent to transit routes to provide direct pedestrian accessibility. Policy 8: The City shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel. Goal 12.4:Maintain and improve transportation system safety. Policy 2: The City shall coordinate with appropriate agencies to provide safe. secure, connected. and desirable pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit facilities. In conjunction with proposed street improvements,the Plan provides for new bike lanes and sidewalks as well as upgrades to inadequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities. These projects will increase multimodal access and circulation throughout the Area. Further,to improve neighborhood livability and create a visually appealing streetscape environment that draws residents and visitors to downtown and promotes more active commercial, recreation and entertainment uses, landscape improvements,street trees,street furniture and other streetscape improvements are identified as key components of the Plan. Policy 11.1.1 Policy 11.6.3 SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS-DOWNTOWN Goal 15.1: The Cia . ' . r ' ! 'I. if a vibrant and active urban villag• heart of the community that is pedestrian oriented. accessible by many modes of transportation,recognizes natural resources as an asset, and 'or ! uses that enable people to live, work,plgy, and shop in an environment that is uniquely Tigard Goal 15.2:Facilitate the development of an urban village. Policy 5:Downtown design, development and provision shall emphasize public safety, accessibility, and attractiveness as primary objectives. Goal 15.4:Develop comprehensive street and circulation improvements for pedestrians, automobiles, bicycles, and transit. Policy 1: The downtown shall be served by a complete array of multi-modal transportation services including auto, transit, bike, and pedestrian facilities. Policy 5: Streetscape and public area design shall focus on creating a pedestrian friendly environment without the visual dominance by automobile-oriented uses. Proposed pedestrian and bicycle improvements,such as the Commuter Rail Access and Tigard Street/Grant Pedestrian/Bicycle Crossing projects,will provide safe and convenient pedestrian access to local shops and transit. In addition,streetscape improvements along Main Street,Burnham Street,Commercial Street and other Area roadways will make downtown a more accommodating,pedestrian-oriented commercial district than it is today. Lastly,public facilities projects such as the Performing Arts Center and Public Market will generate support for new and existing businesses that provide entertainment and recreational options for downtown visitors. 6e • • • otherr edes) . • . . -- _ . . . . - Goal 3: Safety Policy 3 Safe and secure pedestrian and bikeways shall be designed between parks and other activity centers in Tigard. Goal 5: Accessibility - • . .• . . . ■ requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. ■ • Policy 1 Design arterial routes, highway access and adjacent land use:, C. Transportation System Plan Goals and Policies TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Goal 12.2: Transportation Efficiency—Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Policy 4: The city shall des'•n .rt'r'al routes hi!hwa access end a.'acent l.nd us-s in ways that facilitate the efficient movement of people. goods, and services. Goal 12.3:Multi-modal Transportation S ' — ' • '0 • ! ! • •/ • . •-��i r transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. Policy 5: The city shall require development adjacent to transit routes to provide direct pedestrian accessibility. Policy 7: The city shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel. Goal 12.4:Safe Transportation S •00 — u ' .1 r '1 !I, ',i I I I < 'I •II MIWA Policy 2: The city shall coordinate with appropriate agencies to provide safe,secure connected and desirable pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit facilities. The Plan includes streetscape improvements and bicycle/pedestrian system improvements designed to encourage alternative modes of transportation to the automobile. By filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system, installing new bike lanes and upgrading existing bikeways to standard,the Plan will help create a complete system of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that enables pedestrians and bicyclists to commute safely and efficiently to and within downtown. The Plan includes street improvements that will address motor vehicle needs in and around downtown Tigard. Projects such as the Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard/Hunziker Realignment and Highway 99W intersection improvements will reduce congestion and improve circulation while creating a safer environment for drivers,pedestrians and bicyclists. D. City of Tigard Park System Master Plan • Contributes to overall community livability and pride; greenspaces; greenways; the City; • Provides safe and well maintained parks and recreation facilities; and • Provides for effective and economically sound management of public resources." ..... . . . . . .. . . ... for people with disabilities;" • "Provide an interconnected pedestrian and bicycle system that links Tigard'& •-- - , .. ... , - . -- , .- , . . --• . centers;"and PARKS, RECREATION, TRAILS,AND OPEN SPACE Goal 8.2: Create a Citywide network of interconnected on-and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Policy 1: The City shall create and interconnected regional and local system of on-and off- road ffroad trails and paths that link together neighborhoods, parks, open spaces. major urban activity centers and regional recreational opportunities utilizing both public property and easements on private property. The Plan includes multiple projects that support the City's park system vision and recommendations. In particular,the Fanno Creek Park Improvements and Enhanced Pedestrian Bridge, Urban Creek/Green Corridor and Urban Green Spaces projects will upgrade and increase multimodal access to existing parks and open space areas and create new green space and recreational areas that will draw residents, shoppers and visitors to downtown Tigard. VII. Proposed Land Uses No changes to this section VIII. Property Acquisition and Disposition No changes to this section IX. Relocation Methods No changes to this section X. Tax Increment Financing of Plan No changes to this section XI. Duration of Plan No changes to this section XII. Future Amendments to Plan No changes to this section Exhibit B Report Accompanying the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Adopted by the City of Tigard December 13,2016 Ordinance No. 16- Approved by Voters DATE Consultant Team Elaine Howard Consulting,LLC Elaine Howard Scott Vanden Bos Tiberius Solutions LLC Nick Popenuk Rob Wyman ECONorthwest Ali Danko Kate Macfarlane TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL,AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES 4 III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN 15 IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA 15 V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS 16 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT 17 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED 20 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN 25 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 26 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA 29 XI. RELOCATION REPORT 29 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment I. INTRODUCTION The Report on the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment(Report)contains background information and project details that pertain to the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan(Plan)Amendment(Amendment). The Report is not a legal part of the Plan, but is intended to provide public information and support the findings made by the City Council as part of the approval of the Plan. The Report provides the analysis required to meet the standards of ORS 457.085(3), including financial feasibility. The format of the Report is based on this statute. The Report documents not only the proposed projects in the Plan,but also documents the existing conditions in the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area(Area). The Report provides only guidance on how the Plan might be implemented.As the Tigard City Center Development Agency(Agency)conducts its annual budget process each year, it has the authority to make adjustments to the assumptions in this Report,particularly in regards to forecast revenues and planned expenditures. The Agency may allocate budgets differently,adjust the timing of the projects,decide to incur debt at different timeframes than projected in this Report, and make other changes,as allowed in the amendments section of the Plan. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 1 Figure 1 —Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Area with Amendment Properties Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Boundary of Amendment Area SW i au • • •• a x • - a m • • co •• m •• T n • • • ' 5�c, •' ♦ • • % '•• •� �...••• •• •• '••. •0 •• d • •a "•r • • • ■ • • •• S\a •ii.■ �' a '. *••. •• • • `• •• Sill• tj•• •■ y6n i sy • Rd ■ `••• 'din St$ • •• • '•e••. • W•■ ••�' a• ♦ 1• • ■ ■ ■ Mill • S . A Boundary of Amendment Area 4■■■• ■ ■ Existing Tigard City Center URA •■■■• C 500 1,000 1,500 feet , I I I I Source:ECONorthwest Figure 2—Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Area After Amendment Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 2 Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Boundary as Amended S,,V,. -.„60 .9 ••+ • ••.. W ...••..�� • •• • • • • • • • S. • • w • • •• v •• Z y• n • S• •••+'• •• : • •• • • 1=11 •4�t •••• •• i • i• • •. •♦• ti •• • .• a`�S ••• •• w 5 • •• • • •N �. : t• a y, •• a• N._ •• B ■ a i dfi St 4• •: • ••t•••••• R .1 0 • •• • • Igo• •1 • a • ti.• ■ ♦■ M a■•■• ■ • Tigard City Center URA a...+ 500 1,000 1,500 feet I I I I Source: FCONorthwest Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 3 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES This section of the Report describes existing conditions within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area and the Amendment Area and documents the occurrence of"blighted areas," as defined by ORS 457.010(1). A. Physical Conditions 1. Land Use The existing Tigard City Center Area is 191.22 acres in size,containing 191 tax lots consisting of 147.91 acres. The Amendment area is 37.74 acres in size, containing 7 tax lots consisting of 37.69 acres. After the Amendment the total Area will be 228.96 acres, including 198 tax lots consisting of 185.60 acres and 43.36 acres of right of way for a total of 228.96 acres. An analysis of property classification data for FYE 2016 from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation was used to determine the land use designation of tax lots in the Area as amended. By acreage, commercial use accounts for the largest land use within the area(51.51%). This is followed by exempt(28.11%),and multifamily residential (11.73%). The total land uses of the Area, by acreage and parcel, are shown in Table 1. Table 1 -Existing Land Use of Area Land Use Existing Exisitng Amendment Amendment Total Total Percent of Taxlots Acres Tax lots Xeres Taxlots Acres Acres Commercial 120 73.16 5 22.45 125 95.61 51.51% 30 52.18 0 0.00 30 52.18 28.11% Industrial 1 6.41 0 0.00 1 6.41 3.45% Multi-fa Residential 10 6.68 1 15.10 11 21.78 11.73% Sin:• Fam Residential 18 5.45 0 0.00 18 5.45 2.94% Vacant 12 4.02 1 0.15 13 4.17 2.25% Total 191 147.90 7 37.70 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 4 2. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations As illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 2,the majority(67.56%)of the Area by acreage is zoned as Mixed Use Central Business District. Table 2-Existing Zoning Designations of Area Existing Existing Amendment Amendment Total Total Percent of /rmin'g Taxlots Acres Taxlots Acres Taxlots Acres acres Mixed Use Central Business District 187 125.40 0 0 187 125.40 67.56% M/U CBD-Planned Deveb.ment Overla 0 0.00 1 15.1 1 15.1 8.14% General Commercial 0 0.00 5 21.61 5 21.61 11.64% Parks and Recreation 4 22.50 0 0.00 4 22.50 12.12% Industrial Park 0 0.00 1 0.99 1 0.99 0.53% Total 191 147.90 7 37.70 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 QI. As illustrated in Table 3, 67.47%of the acreage is designated as Mixed Use Central Business District in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Table 3 -Existing Comprehensive Plan Designations of Area Comprehensive Plan Designation Existing Existing Amendment AmI -1 Anneocal ofal Percent of Tax Lots Acres Taxlots Acres Taxlots Acre. Acres Mixed Use Central Business District 179 110.12 1 15.10 180 125.22 67.47% General Commerical 0 0.00 5 21.61 5 21.61 11.64% O.-nS.:ce 12 37.78 0 0.00 12 37.78 20.36% L. t Industrial 0 0.00 1 0.99 1 0.99 0.53% Total 191 147.90 7 37.70 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 Ql. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 5 Figure 3 Area Zoning Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Zoning Designations (10 • • arae♦ir,h \ ` f1 •Z. 1 ■ Zoning ••. • ••••••••• •.• . Mixed Use CBD • Planned Development ••M; M - Mixed Use CBD General Commercial Industrial Park Parks and Recreation •• ■ City Center URA •■■■• 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet 1 I I I Source:ECONorthwest with data from the City of Tigard and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 6 Figure 4—Area Comprehensive Plan Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Comprehensive Plan Designations 04, •• • ♦ ' •• • illow ,iii , - . . 4,:tv .00,0,,,,A-Lirve. .,:: ••••...• ,..,,,„,. ,, .,.. ,.....,.,„ • ____, • • • ,`'/„ .__„ .. ; rrr•rrrrrrrrarrr s ,4.„. , . -ZA/.>./ '\ 4000 4 NNA:,, ) 141} 4 , :, '':,, ,,,\\:..->\4.---- ' • I. `1Y ` •o. • • Comprehensive Plan moil 4. Mixed Use CBD General Commercial Light Industrial Open Space • ■ City Center URA •rrr• , 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet I I I I Source: ECONorthwest with data from the City of Tigard and Metro RLIS 2016 Q I Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 7 B. Infrastructure This section identifies the existing conditions in the Area to assist in establishing blight. There are projects listed in City of Tigard master plans and Tigard Transportation Systems Plan that identify these existing conditions. This does not mean all of these projects are included in the urban renewal plan. The specific projects to be included in the urban renewal plan are not changed by this Amendment. They are listed in Table 11. 1. Transportation The Tigard Transportation Systems Plan details the transportation needs within the Area. Streets and Intersections There are significant transportation needs within the Area: Table 4—Transportation Needs in the Area Cost Name Description Time Frame Estimate Ash Ave railroad Extend Ash Avenue across the railroad crossing(Burnham tracks from Burnham to Commercial Near-term $3,000,000 to Commercial Street Hall Boulevard widening,Pacific Widen to up to 4/5 lanes,depending on Near-term $2,500,000 Highway to Fanno corridor plan Creek Install a traffic signal at Main Street/Tigard Street. Project need Main Street/Tigard should be reevaluated after Pacific Near-term $350,000 Street Highway/Greenburg Road/Hall Boulevard improvements and Main Street improvements are completed Source:City of Tigard Transportation Systems Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 8 Table 4 Continued—Transportation Needs in the Area ( ost Name Description Time Frame Estimate Provide 2 travel lanes,turn lanes where Main Street Green necessary,on-street parking,good Street(Phase II) sidewalks,and lots of pedestrian-friendly Near-term $2,000,000 amenities on Main Street from the railroad tracks south to Pacific Highway Tigard Transit Provide bicycle hub at Tigard Transit Near-term $50,000 Center bicycle hub Center Convert a segment of inactive railroad Tigard Street Trail right-of-way adjacent to Tigard Street Near-term $1,250,000 from Tiedeman Avenue to Main Street to a multiuse path Commercial Street Install sidewalks on both sides of the Near-term $400.000 street from Main Street to Lincoln Street Source:City of Tigard Transportation Systems Plan 2. Water There are no water needs in the Area. 3. Storm Water There are two storm water projects in the Area: a. 94028—Main Street Storm Rehabilitation (Fanno Creek) Project Need: Upgrade multiple stormwater outfalls in a way that promotes visual appeal in the downtown area. Project Description: The project will upgrade functional stormwater outfalls and abandon inactive stormwater outfalls along Fanno Creek in the vicinity of Main Street. The goal of the project will be to develop a plan for outfall design that improves the aesthetics of downtown Tigard and takes advantages of this well-used location to provide public education about the creek. The plan will develop a vision to be used to attract grant funding. Total Project Cost: $130,000(conceptual planning and grant application only) b. 95042—Commercial Street Sidewalk and Storm Detention Facility(Main to Lincoln) Project Need: Commercial Street currently lacks sidewalks west of Main Street. This project would connect a large residential neighborhood to downtown Tigard and the Tigard Transit Center. Rather high pedestrian volumes are observed despite the lack of adequate pedestrian facilities. Commercial Street is particularly narrow under this reach of the Pacific Highway overcrossing. There is also a lack of sidewalk along Pacific Highway between Naeve Street and Beef Bend Road. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 9 Project Description: This project will construct a sidewalk along one side of Commercial Street from Main Street under the Pacific Highway overcrossing to Lincoln Avenue. The railroad and ODOT may dictate the location of the sidewalk which could result in the roadway being shifted to the southwest so that the sidewalk can be added on the northeast side of the roadway. While the street is under construction, a stormwater facility will be added to treat the stormwater runoff from 47 acres that discharges into Fanno Creek. This project meets outfall retrofitting goals identified in the regional Healthy Streams Plan.A pedestrian path connecting Commercial Street to Center Street and sidewalk along east side of Pacific Highway from Naeve Street to Beef Bend Road will be constructed. This is part of a larger TriMet-managed project to improve access to transit along the Pacific Highway corridor. Total Project Cost: $1,975,000 4. Sewer There is one sanitary sewer project in the Area: 93056—Commercial Street Sanitary Sewer Line Project Need: The sanitary sewer line was constructed in the 1950s and after years of monthly and quarterly cleaning,the pipe walls have become thin. There is also a long sag within the line that requires frequent cleaning. This line is identified in the master plan to be upsized to 12". Project Description: Approximately 358 linear feet of new 12"line will be constructed. Total Project Cost: $135,000. S. Parks and Open Space Fanno Creek Park is the centerpiece of Tigard's downtown redevelopment and revitalization. The park is in the process of being expanded in multiple directions,toward downtown with the upland park and plaza projects and south along the creek past the library. The upland park and plaza area will feature developed gathering and play areas to be implemented along with major redevelopment projects. The floodplain area is a grassy, wooded wetland that provides habitat for a variety of wildlife. The Fanno Creek Park Extension will be developed as a "natural environment"park with open spaces,wetlands, flora and fauna, and limited bridges, boardwalks and soft trails. The new library is located here, as well as a large,meadow field where public gatherings and events can take place. Recommendations for this park include: • Upland Park and Plaza—Continue to follow the recommended "catalyst project"in the Downtown Improvement Plan to recognize and improve a central open space resource and gathering place adjacent to Fanno Creek, supporting a range of passive and active open space and public uses, including a farmers market. The projects and phasing of implementation are described in the Fanno Creek Park&Plaza Master Plan; • Lower Park—In addition to the trail and restoration improvements in the site master plan,the City should consider adding additional local park amenities (play area, picnic site)to serve the area south east of Highway 99 and north of McDonald. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 10 Consider a nature themed play area in this area. Potential locations include in the entrances to the park and Ash street or adjacent to the Senior center; • Park Gateway—The master plan also calls for an improved park gateway with a cantilevered deck and a pathway into the park; and C. Social Conditions Data from the US Census Bureau is used to identify social conditions. The geographies used by the Census Bureau to summarize data do not strictly conform to the boundary of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area. As such,the Census Bureau geographies that most closely align with the Urban Renewal Area boundary are used. The Area is situated at the intersection of seven different Census block groups, each of which extend a great distance beyond the boundary of the Area, including significant residential populations that live adjacent to, but outside of the Area. Within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area,there are 18 tax lots shown as single- family residential use, and another 11 tax lots with multifamily residential use. Only three of the seven overlapping Census block groups include a significant amount of residential land uses within the Area. Thus,we limit our demographic analysis to those three block groups: block groups 1 and 2 in Census Tract 307 and block group 4 in Census Tract 308.01. These block groups have a total residential population of 3,006 as depicted in Tables 5 and 6. Again, the majority of this population lives in areas adjacent to but outside of the Area. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment I 1 The majority of the Area, 78%, is White Alone, followed by Some Other Race Alone, 11%. Table 5—Race in the Area Race Number Percent White Alone 2,348 78% Black or African American Alone 59 2% American Indian and Alaska Native Alone 82 3% Asian Alone 67 2% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone 32 1% Some Other Race Alone 336 11% Two or More races 82 3% Total 3.006 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates The largest age group in the area is 25 to 34 years, 25%, followed by 18 to 24 years and 35 to 44 years, each at 13%. Table 6—Age in the Area Ace Number Percent Under 5 Years 240 8% 5to9Years 150 5% 10 to 14 Years 103 3% 15 to 17 Years 64 2% 18 to 24 Years 396 13% 25 to 34 Years 737 25% 35 to 44 Years 389 13% 45 to 54 Years 366 12% 55 to 64 Years 243 8% 65 to 74 Years 160 5% 75 to 84 Years 108 4% 85 Years and over 50 2% i ttal 3.006 100° , Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 12 A relatively large portion of the adult population in the Area has not achieved a high school diploma, 20%. However, 30%of adult residents in the area have earned a bachelor's degree or higher, another 28%have some college experience without a degree, and an additional 21%have graduated from high school with no college experience. Table 7—Educational Attainment in the Area Educational Attainment Number Percent Less Than High School 420 20% High School Graduate (includes equivalency) 429 21% Some college 584 28% Bachelor's degree 415 20% Master's degree 114 6% Professional school degree 51 2% Doctorate degree 40 2% Total 2.053 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates The majority of residents, 64%,travel less than 30 minutes to work, including those who worked at home. Table 8—Travel Time to Work in the Area Travel Time to Work Number Percent Less than 10 minutes 281 17% 10 to 19 minutes 525 31% 20 to 29 minutes 274 16% 30 to 39 minutes 230 14% 40 to 59 minutes 103 6% 60 to 89 minutes 142 8% 90 or More minutes 56 3% Worked at home 61 4% l otal 1.672 I UU Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer.American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 13 The majority of residents, 58%, drove alone to work. Table 9—Means of Transportation to Work in the Area Means of Transportation to Work Number Percent Drove Alone 971 58% Carpooled 285 17% Public transportation(Includes 206 12% Taxicab Motorcycle 0 0% Bicycle 66 4% Walked 83 5% Other means 0 0% Worked at home 61 4% Total 1.672 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2010-2014,5-Year Estimates D. Economic Conditions 1. Taxable Value of Property within the Area The estimated total assessed value of the Existing Area calculated with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation for FYE 2016, including all real,personal,manufactured, and utility properties, is estimated to be $100,844,506. The estimated total assessed value of the Amendment Area is estimated to be $46,413,073. 2. Building to Land Value Ratio An analysis of property values can be used to evaluate the economic condition of real estate investments in a given area. The relationship of a property's improvement value (the value of buildings and other improvements to the property)to its land value is generally an accurate indicator of the condition of real estate investments. This relationship is referred to as the "Improvement to Land Value Ratio," or"I:L."The values used are real market values. In urban renewal areas, the I:L is often used to measure the intensity of development or the extent to which an area has achieved its short-and long-term development objectives. Table 10 below shows the improvement to land ratios for properties within the Area. The majority of tax lots in the area that are not exempt(41.66%of the total acreage)have I:L ratios of less than 1.0. In other words,the improvements on these properties are worth less than the land they sit on. We identify a target I:L ratio of 2.0 for properties in this Area. Only 31 tax lots in the area, including 16.61%of the acreage have I:L ratios of 2.0 or more in FYE 2016. The Area as a whole, is underdeveloped and not contributing its full potential to the tax base in Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 14 Table 10-I:L Ratio of Parcels in the Area Existing Existing Amend Amendment Total Total Percent of Taxlots Acres ment Acres Taxlots Acres Acres Taxlots Exempt 30 52.18 0 0.00 30 52.18 28.11% No Improvement Value 13 7.96 1 0.15 14 8.11 4.37% 0.01-0.50 41 25.49 2 5.98 43 31.47 16.96% 0.51-1.00 29 22.25 2 15.48 31 37.73 20.33% 1.01-1.50 25 17.77 0 0.00 25 17.77 9.57% 1.51-2.00 22 7.51 0 0.00 22 7.51 4.05% 2.01-2.50 2 1.04 1 0.99 3 2.03 1.09% 2.51-3.00 9 4.32 0 0.00 9 4.32 2.33% 3.01-4.00 13 8.26 0 0.00 13 8.26 4.45% >4.00 7 1.12 1 15.10 8 16.22 8.74% Total 191 147.9 7 37.7 198 185.6 100.00% Calculated by Tiberius Solutions LLC with source data from Washington County Office of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016). E. Impact on Municipal Services The fiscal impact of tax increment financing on taxing districts that levy taxes within the Area(affected taxing districts) is described in Section IX Impact of Tax Increment Financing of this Report. This subsection discusses the fiscal impacts resulting from potential increases in demand for municipal services. Since the properties being added in the Amendment are all in the city limits and are now receiving municipal services,there will be no negative impact on municipal services as a result of bringing the properties into the urban renewal area. III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN The reason for selecting the Area is to provide additional revenue to enhance the ability to fund improvements necessary to cure blight within the Area. IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA This section does not change as there are no new projects. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 15 V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS The estimated allocation of funds to specific projects shown in this Report are the best estimates of future expenditures at the time of preparation of the Amendment. The Agency will be able to review and update the allocations on an annual basis when they prepare the annual budget.Nominal dollars are year of expenditure dollars inclusive of inflation,which is assumed to be 3.0%per year. Table 11 —Projects to be Completed Using Urban Renewal Area Funds Projects (nominal S) (constant 2016 5) Potential Saxony Purchase $515,000 $515,000 Saxony demo/clean/prep $525,600 $525,000 Other budgeted projects $223,000 $223,000 Tigard Street Trail Match $154,500 $150,000_ Street Improvements $1,800,000 $1,380,000 Streetscape Improvements $600,000 $533,000 Bike/Ped Facilities $400,000 $355,000 Parks $400,000 $355,000_ Public Spaces $2,100,000 $1,866,000 Public Facilities $3,090,000 $2,368,000_ Planning and Development Assistance $2,650,000 $2,278,000 Property Acquisition $4,500,000 $3,998,000 Finance Fees $262,000 $221,000_ Total Project Expenditures $17,220,100 $14,767,000_ Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 16 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT The projects will be ongoing and will be completed as directed by the Agency. The Area is anticipated to complete all projects on or before FYE 2026 and have sufficient tax increment finance revenue to terminate the district in FYE 2034. Changes in market conditions could affect the assumed development schedule. Anticipated project completion dates are shown in Table 12. The Agency may change the completion dates in their annual budgeting process or as project decisions are made in administering the urban renewal plan. The first year of tax increment collections for the property being added in the Amendment is FYE 2019. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 17 Table 12-Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars TOTAL, 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-211 2020-21 PROJECT FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance 140,333 66,311 299,306 244,584 44,395 Pay-as-you-go(Transfer from TIF Fund) $2,732,884 590,119 329,606 198,781 53,588 144,836 Bond/Loan Proceeds $13,100,000 0 0 0 0 8,300,000 Rental Income $741,314 78,157 78,157 95,000 95,000 95,000 Proceeds from Property Sales $0 0 0 0 0 0 Intergovernmental Revenues $500,000 500,000 Interest Earnings $5,569 702 332 1,497 1,223 222 Total Resources $17,079,767 1,309,311 474,406 594,584 394,395 8,584,453 Expenditures(nominal$) Potential Saxony Purchase ($515,000) -515,000 Saxony demo/clean/prep ($525,600) -505,000 -20,600 Other budgeted projects ($223,000) -223,000 Tigard Street Trail Match ($154,500) -154,500 Street Improvements ($1,800,000) Streetscape Improvements ($600,000) -600,000 Bike/Ped Facilities ($400,000) -400,000 Parks ($400,000) -400,000 Public Spaces ($2,100,000) -2,100,000 Public Facilities ($3,090,000) Planning and Development Assistance ($2,650,000) -350,000 -350,000 -350,000 Property Acquisition ($4,500,000) -4,500,000 Finance Fees ($262,000) -166,000 Total Expenditures ($17,220,100) -1,243,000 -175,100 -350,000 -350,000 -8,516,000 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 18 Table 12— Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 2 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 PROJECT FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance 68,453 35,958 28,431 98,915 86,882 Pay-as-you-go(Transfer from TIF Fund) 217,163 292,293 370,342 437,472 98,684 Bond/Loan Proceeds 0 0 0 0 4,800,000 Rental Income 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 Proceeds from Property Sales 0 0 0 0 0 Intergovernmental Revenues Interest Earnings 342 180 142 495 434 Total Resources 385,958 428,431 498,915 536,882 4,986,000 Expenditures(nominal$) Potential Saxony Purchase Saxony demo/clean/prep Other budgeted projects Tigard Street Trail Match Street Improvements -1,800,000 Streets cape Improvements Bike/Ped Facilities Parks Public Spaces Public Facilities -3.090.000 Planning and Development Assistance -350,000 -400,000 -400,000 -450,000 Property Acquisition Finance Fees -96,000 Total Expenditures -350,000 -400,000 -400,000 -450,000 -4,986,000 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 19 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED Table 13 shows the allocation of tax increment revenues to debt service and the debt service reserve fund. Table 13 shows no new debt being incurred after FYE 2026, as required by the Plan. It is anticipated that the Agency will have sufficient resources to retire all debt by FYE 2034,which would then allow the Agency to cease collecting tax increment revenues and close down the Area. The time frame for retiring all debt for the Area is not absolute; it may vary depending on the actual terms of the indebtedness incurred, and the actual tax increment revenues received. If the economy is slower, it may take longer to repay all debt; if the economy is more robust than the projections, it may take a shorter time period. The Agency may decide to issue bonds or take on loans on a different schedule, and that will alter the financing assumptions, however the existing Plan prohibits any new debt after FYE 2026. The maximum indebtedness of the Plan is $22,000,000(twenty-two million dollars), and is not being increased by this Amendment. The City of Tigard estimates that$3,244,382 of indebtedness has been incurred by the Agency for the Area to date,through the end of FYE 2016,resulting in $18,755,618 in remaining capacity for additional indebtedness for the Area. Information on scheduled debt service payments for all existing debt was provided by the City of Tigard Finance Department. Additionally,we assume the Agency will undertake two additional loans in future years to finance the costs of projects identified in the Plan. For speculative future borrowings,the amounts,timing, and terms of the debt are unknown. The assumptions used in this Report are for planning purposes only, and subject to change based on market conditions. These assumptions were developed by Tiberius Solutions LLC and informed by conversations with staff from the City of Tigard Finance Department. Specific key assumptions for the financial analysis include: • Debt Service Coverage Ratio: Payments for future indebtedness are structured so that annual tax increment revenues are projected to equal or exceed 1.25 x total annual debt service payments in all years,with one exception. In FYE 2026, final year allowed by the Plan to incur new debt,the projected debt service coverage ratio is reduced to 1.10 to maximize the borrowing potential of the Area. • New Loan FYE 2021: Assumes principal amount of$8,300,000 with 3.0% interest rate, 20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. • New Loan FYE 2026: Assumes principal amount of$4,800,000 with 5.0%interest rate,20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 20 Without the Amendment,the Area is forecast to be able to incur$16,300,000 in indebtedness through FYE 2026,which would be $5,700,000 less than the total maximum indebtedness of the Area. With the Amendment,the Area is forecast to be able to incur$19,100,000 in indebtedness through FYE 2026,which would be $2,900,000 less than the total maximum indebtedness of the Area. Thus,the increased tax increment revenue that will be generated due to the amendment is projected to increase the borrowing capacity of the Area by $2,800,000 through FYE 2026,helping the Agency fund more of the projects identified in the Plan. The assumptions used in this analysis present just one potential scenario for the long-term cash flow of the Area. If actual results differ from these assumptions, it could affect the ability of the Agency to achieve these projects at these dollar amounts on this schedule. Based on these assumptions, we find the Plan Amendment financially feasible. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 21 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service and Debt Service Reserve Fund Total 2016-17 201 7-1 8 201 8-1 9 2 01 9-2 0 2020-21 DEBT SERVICE FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance 359,791 0 0 212,169 0 TW for IJRA $106,092,176.00 397,103 492,519 570,001 637,033 706,659 Total Resources $106,664,136.00 756,894 492,519 570,001 849,202 706,659 Expenditures Debt Service 2014 US Bank Loan ($1,268,621.00) -162,842 -158,980 -155,118 -791,681 Loan#5 Sewer ($109,434.11) -512 -512 -512 -512 -512 Loan#5 General Fund ($42,904.56) -201 -201 -201 -201 -201 Loan#6 General Fund ($389,352.89) -1,949 -1,949 -1,949 -1,949 -1,949 Loan#7 General Fund ($273,737.25) -1,270 -1,270 -1,270 -1,270 -1,270 2021 New Loan ($11,157,807.46) -557,890 2026 New Loan ($3,466,479.77) $0.00 $0.00 Total Debt Service ($16,708,337.04) -166,775 -162,913 -159,051 -795,614 -561,823 Coverage Ratio 2.38 3.02 3.58 0.80 1.26 Transfer to D S Reserve Fund ($89,743,627.00) -590,119 -329,606 P -198,781 -53,588 -144,836 Total Expenditures ($106,451,964.04) -756,894 -492 519 -357,832 -849,202 -706,659 Fndin l Fund Balance $0.00 $0.00 $212 169.00 $0.00 $0.00 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Debt Service Reserve Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Interest Earnings 53,954,801.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer from D/S Fund S89,743,627.00 $590,119 $329,606 $198,781 $53,588 $144,836 Total Resources $93,698,428.00 $590,119 $329,606 $198,781 $53,588 8144,836 Expenditures Transfer to Project Fund For URA admin (52,732,884.00) -$590,119 -$329,606 -$198,781 -$53,588 -$144,836 Total Expenditures -$590,119 -$329,606 -$198,781 -$53,588 -$144,836 Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Cumulative D/S Remaining -$16,541,565 -$16,378,652 -$16,219,601 -$15,423,987 -$14,862,164 TIF Sufficient to Pay Off D/S NO NO NO NO NO Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 22 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service and Debt Service Reserve Fund,page 2 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 DEBT SERV/CE FUND Resources Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIF for URA 778,986 854,116 932,165 1,013,245 1,097,480 1,184,991 Total Resources 778,986 854,116 932,165 1,013,245 1,097,480 1,184,991 Expenditures Debt Service 2014 US Bank Loan Loan#5 Sewer -512 -512 -512 -10,533 -10,533 -10,533 Loan#5 General Fund -201 -201 -201 -4,130 -4,130 -4,130 Loan#6 General Fund -1,949 -1,949 -1,949 -1,949 P -37,181 -37,181 Loan#7 General Fund -1,270 -1,270 -1,270 -1,270 -1,270 -26,104 2021 New Loan -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 2026 New Loan -385,164 -385,164 Total Debt Service -561,823 -561,823 -561,823 -575,773 -996,169 -1,021,003 Coverage Ratio 1.39 1.52 1.66 1.76 1.10 1.16 Transfer to D/S Reserve Fund -217,163 -292,293 -370,342 -437,472 -101,311 -163,988 Total Expenditures -778,986 -854,116 -932,165 -1,013,245 -1,097,480 -1,184,991 Endin l Fund Balance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 21124-25 21125-26 2026-27 Debt Service Reserve Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,627 Interest Earnings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13 Transfer from D/S Fund $217,163 $292,293 $370,342 $437,472 $101,311 $163,988 Total Resources $217,163 $292,293 $370,342 $437,472 $101,311 $166,628 Expenditures Transfer to Project Fund For URA admin -$217,163 -$292,293 -$370,342 -$437,472 -$98,684 $0 Total Expenditures -$217,163 -$292,293 -$370,342 -$437,472 -$98,684 $0 Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,627 $166,628 Cumulative D/S Remaining -$14,300,341 -$13,738,518 -$13,176,695 -$12,600,922 -$11,604,753 -$10,583,750 TIF Sufficient to Pay Off D/S NO NO NO NO NO NO Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 23 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service and Debt Service Reserve Fund,page 3 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 DEBT SERVICE FUM) Resources Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIF for URA 1,386,954 1,485,861 1,588,629 1,695,414 1,806,374 1,921,676 469,458 Total Resources 1,386,954 1,485,861 1,588,629 1,695,414 1,806,374 1,921,676 469,458 Expenditures Debt Service 2014 US Bank Loan Loan#5 Sewer -10,533 -10,533 -10,533 -10,533 -10,533 -10,533 -10,533 Loan#5 General Fund -4,130 -4,130 -4,130 -4,130 -4,130 -4,130 -4,130 Loan#6 General Fund -37,181 -37,181 -37,181 -37,181 -37,181 -37,181 -37,181 Loan#7 Ceneral Fund -26,104 -26,104 -26,104 -26,104 -26,104 -26,104 -26,104 2021 New Loan -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 -557,890 2026 New Loan -385,164 -385,164 -385,164 -385,164 -385,164 -385,164 -385,164 Total Debt Service -1,021,003 -1,021,003 -1,021,003 -1,021,003 -1,021,003 -1,021,003 -1,021,003, Coverage Ratio 1.36 1.46 1.56 1.66 1.77 1.88 0.46 Transfer to D'S Reserve Fund -365,951 -464,858 -567,626 -674,411 -785,371 -900,673 551,545 Total Expenditures -1,386,954 -1,485,861 -1,588,629 -1,695,414 -1,806,374 -1,921,676 -469,458 Ending Fund Balance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 Debt Service Reserve Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $166,628 $533,412 $1,000,937 $1,573,568 $2,255,847 $3,052,497 $3,968,432 Interest Earnings $833 $2,667 $5,005 $7,868 $11,279 $15,262 $19,842 Transfer from las Fund $365,951 $464,858 $567,626 $674,411 $785,371 $900,673 -$551,545 Total Resources $533,412 $1,000,937 $1,573,568 $2,255,847 $3,052,497 $3,968,432 $3,436,729 Expenditures Transfer to Project Fund For URA admin $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenditures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Dicing Fund Balance $533,412 $1,000,937 $1,573,568 $2,255,847 $3,052,497 $3,968,432 $3,436,729 Cunulative 1)/S Remaining -$9,562,747 -$8,541,744 -$7,520,741 -$6,499,738 -$5,478,735 -$4,457,732 -$3,436,729 TIF Sufficient to Pay Off D/S NO NO NO NO NO NO YES Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 24 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN The estimated tax increment revenues through FYE 2034 as shown above, are based on projections of the assessed value of development within the Area and the consolidated tax rate that will apply in the Area. The analysis assumes average annual growth in assessed value of 4.0%for real property, 1.0%for personal and utility property, and 0.0%for manufactured property. These growth rates assume both the appreciation of existing property values and new construction activity in the Area. Additionally, in FYE 2018,the forecast includes an increase in assessed value of$4,877,582 for real property that would be the result of a new 165-unit mixed-use development in the Area that is currently under construction. This increase in value would be on top of the projected 4.0%background growth rate for assessed value of real property in the Area. This increase is based on information provided to the City of Tigard by the developer regarding the total anticipated construction cost of the project. These projections reflect the plans of the developer to take advantage of the State of Oregon Vertical Housing Tax abatement program, which results in 60%of the value of the project being tax exempt for a period of ten years. Table 14 shows the projected incremental assessed value,tax rates and tax increment revenues each year,adjusted for discounts, delinquencies, and compression losses. These projections of increment are the basis for the projections in Tables 12 and 13. The first year the impact of the Amendment would be reflected in the calculation of tax increment revenues is FYE 2019,with an increase in the frozen base value, as well as a corresponding increase in total assessed value of the Area. Gross TIF is calculated by multiplying the tax rate times the excess value. The tax rate is stated per thousand dollars of assessed value, so the calculation is"tax rate times excess value divided by one thousand". The consolidated tax rate includes only permanent rates and general obligation bonds rates approved by voters prior to October 6, 2001. In FYE 2017 and 2018 the tax rate is forecast to decrease, due to the expiration of those general obligation bonds. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 25 Table 14—Pro'ected Incremental Assessed Value, Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues Tax Increment Finance Revenue Pl F Assessed'alue Frozen Base Excess Value lax Rate Gross'17F Adjustments Net TIF ('umulatiw TIF 2016 $100,844,506 $69,207,378 $31,637,128 12.1668 384,923 (19,246) 365,677 365,677 2017 $104,326,036 $69,207,378 $35,118,658 11.9026 418,003 (20,900) 397,103 762,780 2018 $112,818,927 $69,207,378 $43,611,549 11.8877 518,441 (25,922) 492,519 1,255,299 2019 $167,485,234 $117,012,843 $50,472,391 11.8877 600,001 (30,000) 570,001 1,825,300 2020 $173,420,769 $117,012,843 $56,407,926 11.8877 670,561 (33,528) 637,033 2,462,333 2021 $179,586,127 $117,012,843 $62,573,284 11.8877 743,852 (37,193) 706,659 3,168,992 2022 $185,990,425 $117,012,843 $68,977,582 11.8877 819,985 (40,999) 778,986 3,947,978 2023 $192,643,144 $117,012,843 $75,630,301 11.8877 899,070 (44,954) 854,116 4,802,094 2024 $199,554,145 $117,012,843 $82,541,302 11.8877 981,226 (49,061) 932,165 5,734,259 2025 $206,733,679 $117,012,843 $89,720,836 11.8877 1,066,574 (53,329) 1,013,245 6,747,504 2026 $214,192,409 $117,012,843 $97,179,566 11.c+t77 1,155,242 . (57,762) 1,097,480 7,844,984 2027 $221,941,422 $117,012,843 $104,928,579 11.8877 1,247,359 (62,368) 1,184,991 9,029,975 2028 $239,824,845 $117,012,843 $122,812,002 11.8877 1,459,952 (72,998) 1,386,954 10,416,929 2029 $248,582,783 $117,012,843 $131,569,940 11.8877 1,564,064 (78,203) 1,485,861 11,902,790 2030 $257,682,729 $117,012,843 $140,669,886 11.8877 1,672,241 (83,612) 1,588,629 13,491,419_ 2031 $267,138,280 $117,012,843 $150,125.437 11.8877 1,784,646 (89.232) 1,695,414 15,186,833 2032 $276.963,577 $117,012,843 $159,950,734 11.8877 1,901,446 (95,072) 1,806,374 16,993,207_ 2033 $287,173,323 $117,012,843 $170,160,480 11.8877 2,022,817 (101,141) 1,921,676 18,914,883_ 2034 $297,782,813 $117,012,843 $180,769,970 11.8877 2148,939 (107,447) 2,041,492 20,956,375 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes: TIF is tax increment revenues Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Changes in total tax rates are due to general obligation bonds with variable rates.These bonds are scheduled to be retired in FYE 2017,after which the total tax rate for the area will stabilize as the sum total of all permanent rates for affected taxing districts. IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING This section describes the impact of tax increment financing of the Amendment(properties being added to the Area), both until and after the indebtedness is repaid, upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the urban renewal area. The impact of tax increment financing on overlapping taxing districts consists primarily of the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in assessed value in the Area. These projections are for impacts due to the addition of properties in this Amendment, and are shown in Tables 15a and 15b. This Amendment does not change the maximum indebtedness of the Plan, nor does it change the allowed duration of the Plan to incur indebtedness, and the date to pay off all indebtedness and cease collecting tax increment revenues is anticipated to be the same with and without the Amendment. Therefore,the impact of the Amendment on overlapping taxing districts is measured by the increase in annual tax increment revenues that would be foregone by those districts until all debt is repaid. The Tigard Tualatin School District and the Northwest Regional Education Service District are not directly affected by the tax increment financing,but the amounts of their taxes divided for the urban renewal plan are shown in the following tables. Under current school funding law,property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund revenues to achieve per-student funding targets. Under this system,property taxes foregone,due to the use of tax increment financing, are substantially replaced with State School Fund revenues,as determined by a funding formula at the State level. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 26 Tables 15a and 15b show the projected impacts to permanent rate levies of taxing districts as a result of this Amendment. Table 15a shows the general government levies and Table 15b shows the education levies. General obligation bonds will not be impacted by this Amendment,because only bonds approved by voters prior to October 6, 2001 are affected by this Plan, and those bonds will have all expired by the time the Amendment is reflected in the calculation of tax increment revenues by the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation, expected in FYE 2019. Table 15a-Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies - General Government General Government Washington City of Port of Tigard/Tualatin County Tigard TVFR Portland Metro Aquatic District Fl E: Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Subtotal 2019 ($6,219) ($6,951) ($4,219) ($194) ($42) ($249) ($17,874) 2020 ($10,135) ($11,329) ($6,876) ($316) ($68) ($406) ($29,130) 2021 ($14,204) ($15,877) ($9,636) ($443) ($96) ($569) ($40,825) 2022 ($18,432) ($20,602) ($12,503) ($575) ($123) ($738) ($52,973) 2023 ($22,825) ($25,512) ($15,483) ($712) ($153) ($913) ($65,598) 2024 ($27,389) ($30,613) ($18,579) ($854) ($184) ($1,096) ($78,715) 2025 IIMEM ($35,913 ($21,796) ($1,002) ($216 ($1,286 ($92,344 2026 $37,059 ($41,421 ($25,138 $1,156 ($249 ($1,484 $106,507 2027 ($42,178) ($47,144) ($28,612) ($1,315) ($283) ($1,688) ($121,220) 2028 ($47,499 ($53,091) ($32,221) ($1,481) ($319) ($1,901) ($136,512 2029 ($53,028) ($59,271) ($35,972) ($1,653) ($356) ($2,122) ($152,402) 2030 ($58,773) ($65,693) ($39,869) ($1,833) ($395) ($2,352) ($168,915) 2031 ($64,744 $72,366 ($43,919 $2,019) ($435 ($2,592) $186,075 2032 $70,949 $79,302 ($48,128 MEM ($476 $2,840 ($203,90 2033 ($77,397) ($86,509) ($52,502) ($2,413) ($520) ($3,098) ($222,439) 2034 .84,158 .94,066 '.57,089 '.2,624 .566 .3,369 .241,872 Total $498,804 «= $338,364 $3,349 $19,965 $1,433,564 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 27 Table 15b-Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies-Education Education Tigard-Tualatin PCC NW Regional ESD SD FVE Perm Perm Perm Subtotal Total 2019 ($782) ($426) ($13,799) ($15,007) ($32,881) 2020 IISEM ($694) ($22,490 ($24,459) $53,589 2021 ($1,787) ($972) $31,520 ($34,279) ($75,104 2022 ($2,319) ($1,261) ($40,901) ($44,481) ($97,454) 2023 ($2,871) ($1,561) $50,648) ($55,080) ($120,678) 2024 ($3,445) ($1,873) ($60,775) ($66,093) ($144,808) 2025 ($4,041) ($2,198) ($71,298 ($77,537) ($169,881) 2026 ($4,661 ($2,535) ($82,233 ($89,429) ($195,936 2027 ($5,305 ($2,885) ($93,594 ($101,784) ($223,004 2028 ($5,975) ($3,249) ($105,401 ($114,625) ($251,137) 2029 ($6,670) ($3,628) ($117,669) ($127,967) ($280,369) 2030 ($7,392) ($4,020) ($130,419 ($141,831) ($310,746) 2031 ($8,144) ($4,429) ($143,668 ($156,241) ($342,316) 2032 $8,923) ($4,853) ($157,436 IIMIGISMI ($375,119 2033 ($9,735) ($5,294) ($171,744) ($186,773) ($409,212) 2034 '.10,585 IIMMIESEN ',186,747 ',203,089 ,''',961 Total $62,740 Millianffn $1,106,848 $1,203,709 $2,637,273 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Table 16 shows the projected increased revenue to the taxing jurisdictions after tax increment proceeds are projected to be terminated. These projections are for FYE 2035. Table 16-Additional Revenues Obtained after Termination of Tax Increment Financing Tax Revenue in FYE 2035(year after expiration) From Frozen Taxing District Tax Rate Base From Excess Value Total General Government Washington County 2.2484 $155,606.00 $538,718.00 $694,324.00 City of Tigard 2.5131 $173,925.00 $602,140.00 $776,065.00 TVFR 1.5252 $105,555.00 $365,439.00 $470,994.00 Port of Portland 0.0701 $4,851.00 $16,796.00 $21,647.00 Metro 0.0151 $1,045.00 $3,618.00 $4,663.00 Tigard/Tualatin Aquatic District 0.0900 $6,229.00 $21,564.00 $27,793.00 Subtotal 6.4619 $447,211.00 $1,548,275.00 $1,995,486.00 Education PCC 0.2828 $19,572.00 $67,759.00 $87,331.00 NW Regional ESD 0.1538 $10,644.00 $36,851.00 $47,495.00 Tigard-Tualatin SD 4.9892 $345,289.00 $1,195,415.00 $1,540,704.00 Subtotal 5.4258 $375,505.00 $1,300,025.00 $1,675,530.00 Total 11.8877 $822,716.00 $2,848,300.00 $3,671,016.00 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 28 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA State law limits the percentage of both a municipality's total assessed value and the total land area that can be contained in an urban renewal area at the time of its establishment to 25%for municipalities under 50,000 in population. As noted below,the frozen base, including all real,personal,personal, manufactured,and utility properties in the Area after the Amendment, is projected to be $117,012,843. The total assessed value of the City of Tigard, minus excess value of the existing urban renewal areas is $5,875,954,608. Excess value is the assessed value created above the frozen base in the urban renewal area. The total urban renewal assessed value is 9.30%of the total assessed value of the City,minus excess value, below the 25%statutory limitation. The Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area contains 228.96 acres, including right-of-way, and the City of Tigard contains 8,129 acres.After accounting for the acreage in the potential Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area, 9.56 %of the City's acreage would be in an urban renewal area,below the 25% statutory limitation. Table 17—Urban Renewal Area Conformance with Assessed Value and Acreage Limits Assessed Value UR Excess Acreage City of Tigard $5,907,591,736 8,129 City of Tigard minus UR excess $5,875,954,608 Tigard City Center $117,012,843 $31,637,128 _ 228.96 Proposed Tigard Triangle $429,654,966 547.90 City Center Plus Tigard Triangle $546,667,809 776.86 Percentage in UR 9.30% 9.56% Source:Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting,LLC with data from City of Tigard and Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) XI. RELOCATION REPORT There is no relocation report required for the Plan.No specific acquisitions that would result in relocation benefits have been identified,however,there are plans to acquire land for infrastructure which may trigger relocation benefits in the future in the Area. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Amendment 29 Exhibit C CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes November 14,2016 CALL TO ORDER President Fitzgerald called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ROLL CALL Present: President Fitzgerald Vice President Feeney Alt. Commissioner Enloe Commissioner Hu Commissioner Jelinek Commissioner Lieuallen Commissioner McDowell Commissioner Middaugh Commissioner Muldoon Commissioner Schmidt Absent: Alt. Commissioner Mooney Staff Present: Tom McGuire,Assistant Community Development Director; Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner; Susan Shanks, Associate Planner; Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant; Lauren Scott, Community Engagement Coordinator COMMUNICATIONS —Since President Fitzgerald wasn't present for the original Triangle Medical Office Building PD hearing, it was decided that Vice President Feeney would preside over that portion of the meeting. CONSIDER MINUTES October 17, 2016 Meeting Minutes: President Fitzgerald asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the October 17 minutes; there being none, President Fitzgerald declared the minutes approved as submitted. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 17 TRIANGLE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT- PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (PDR) 2016-00011; SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2016-00007 November 14,2016 Page 1 of 11 REQUEST: The applicant requests concurrent Planned Development Concept Plan and Detailed Development Plan review for a 36,000 square foot medical office building on a 3.73- acre vacant parcel located southwest of SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue. Proposed site improvements include a single-story building with surface parking taking access from SW Dartmouth through the eastern access to the adjacent Walmart development. A pedestrian path is proposed through the site from SW 72nd to the Walmart parking lot. A vegetated corridor along the northern property line is protected and improved. LOCATION: SW of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street;Washington County Tax Map 2S101BA,Tax Lot 00300. ZONES: C-G: general commercial district,with planned development overlay. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.350, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Vice President Feeney opened the public hearing. QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING STATEMENTS Vice President Feeney read the required statements and procedural items from the quasi-judicial hearing guide. There were no abstentions; there were no challenges of the commissioners for bias or conflict of interest. Ex-parte contacts: None. Site visitations: Commissioners Jelinek, Muldoon, Feeney, McDowell, Schmidt, Hu, Middaugh,Lieuallen, and Fitzgerald. No one wished to challenge the jurisdiction of the commission. STAFF REPORT regarding the Concept Plan The staff report is available on-line at the City website one week prior to the hearing. Gary Pagenstecher, City of Tigard Associate Planner, went over the staff report. He recapped what had happened at the previous meeting and distributed a supplemental packet that the applicant had supplied for them (Exhibit A). Regarding process - Gary explained the applicant requests the Concept Plan and Detailed Plan votes be cast at the same hearing for purposes of appeal and noted that this is at the commission's discretion. He reminded them this hearing is a continuation of the Concept Plan and said the applicant requested a straw poll at the end of the Concept Plan deliberation to see whether the commission is comfortable with the applicant's proposal with respect to the 6th criteria. After that, the expectation for tonight would be that they would open the record for discussion of the detailed plan, close the record, and if they're comfortable with both plans they might be able to vote on both at the same hearing. If they're not ready to vote, they could provide direction to the applicant and continue the hearing to a time certain. Additionally, Gary said the representative of Mr. Martin had requested that there be a continuation from the evening's hearing to a time certain with a 7-day open record period- and Gary said he believes the applicant is amenable to that. Gary also noted that he had received electronic comment letters dated 11/14/16 (that will be attached to the next staff report). November 14, 2016 Page 2 of 11 PD purposes consider: weighing the amount of development on a site to balance interests of owner, developer, neighbors, and city; and relating the built environment to the natural environment. The 6 Concept Plan review approval criteria are guidelines, with discretion for the Planning Commission on how outcomes are achieved and even to what level the achievement is expected; This is how staffs CP recommendation to Approve - it comes with a caveat that the Planning Commission may find alternative approaches that better meet the approval criteria. In light of the detailed plan review, staff is asking the Commission to consider concept plan criteria 1 and 6. With respect to Criterion 1: Do the proposed open space areas adequately protect the natural features of the site, or should the applicant find ways to preserve additional vegetated corridor to the north, or step improvements with the grade to improve the project's relationship to SW 72nd Avenue on the east? With respect to Criterion 6: Does the proposed Concept Plan sufficiently protect natural features, or provide additional amenities that enhance the neighborhood that are not otherwise available?An example would be a pedestrian path. These Concept Plan criteria have corollaries with the Detailed Plan approval criteria, which we will discuss next with the applicant's presentation of revised materials in response to the PC's direction and staffs findings and recommended conditions of approval for the Detailed Plan. POINT OF ORDER Dana Krawzcuk, representing Base Camp I, LLC, made a point of order and clarification: Our understanding was the Concept Plan was being considered on its own and then once that was decided you would turn to the final development plan. Our understanding is the record was closed on the Concept Development Plan and that this evening the commission would first deliberate on only the Concept Plan and then make a tentative vote on that—not finalize that vote—because we are concerned about having dualing appeals proceeding. Once that tentative vote on what you heard last time, and the materials submitted two weeks ago, then we would have a staff report on the Detailed Plan and give our presentation, let anyone else testify and then deal with the Detailed Plan separately. DELIBERATION ON CONCEPT PLAN Vice President Feeney: What are our thoughts on the Concept Plan? We have the option of a tentative vote on the Concept Plan. • Fine with the concept plan but still concerned with the 20-foot retaining wall—safety risk and sounds like it may be an eyesore. • I have concerns with the natural features. This is the heart of the Triangle • Criteria 1 —I would like more natural vegetation,less parking lot—either under the building or partially under the building • Criteria 6 —Would like to see more done—maybe natural landscape. November 14, 2016 Page 3 of 11 • It's been disturbed already as part of Walmart's application. They meet the criteria for buffers. TENTATIVE VOTE Vice President Feeney asked, "Who would tentatively approve the Concept Plan?" Abstain: Lieuallen&Jelinek Yay: Yi, Muldoon, Feeney, Middaugh, & McDowell; Nay: Fitzgerald and Schmidt. VOTE TO TENTATIVELY APPROVE THE CONCEPT PLAN PASSES FIVE -TWO TWO ABSTENTIONS OPEN PUBLIC HEARING FOR DETAILED PLAN Vice President opened the public hearing for the Detailed Development Plan. DETAILED PLAN STAFF REPORT Gary Pagenstecher noted that prior to issuing the staff report, Staff discussed Detailed Plan issue areas with the applicant to better understand the circumstances and tradeoffs associated with the proposed design and to create an opportunity for the applicant to revise their plans to meet the standards and provide them for Commission review and consideration tonight. Gary went over the staff's findings from the staff report and noted that attention to the district standards is the focus of the staff report and a few other conditions as well, but the applicant feels that with the revised materials, that they have met most of those district standard conditions that were included in the staff report. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Brian Bennett, the developer on the site, on behalf of Compass Oncology to develop the comprehensive oncology cancer treatment center briefly stated that there were four various questions that the commission had at the end of the last session and addressed them. He noted they decided to prioritize the natural resource—the wetland, the buffer, the enhancement of the buffer over the site topography. He said they met with the adjacent property owners offering several different opportunities to work together. Mimi Doukas —AKS Engineering, representing Base Camp 1,LLC noted they had submitted additional material to the commissioners. They are treating the issues in a prioritized fashion with more priority on the wetlands. They'd sat down with adjacent property owners;it was a stalemate, but the conversation took place. Ms. Doukas believes they've come to a good November 14,2016 Page 4 of 11 solution. They've tried to address all the commission concerns and staff had good feedback in regards to the treatment along 72nd so they think the application has improved in that regard. Chuck Gregory,civil engineer with AKS Engineering—spoke about the sidewalk being pushed further away from the site. He also spoke about the retaining wall and how it actually opens up the view for the pedestrians as they come down 72nd. He noted other improvements such as adding many trees and that the pathway is concrete rather than asphalt. There are stone columns, benches— similar to the intersection of 72nd and Dartmouth. He spoke about safety, the required parking spaces,integration of a healing garden on the west side of the building,and improved streetscape. Scott Harris JRJ Architects went over the exhibits one by one that had been submitted in the supplemental material. Mimi Doukas added that they are comfortable with the conditions of approval with the exception of Condition 17—there's a little bit of wordsmithing requested by Dana Krawzcuk in the Perkins Koie memo. They want to make sure they are not exceeding rights that they don't have for adjacent property. The substance is there—just a little wordsmithing is needed. Dana Krawzcuk said the intent with clarifying Condition#17 —the access easement that the subject site has over Walmart is specified just to our property—it's not a public access easement —so while we are willing to grant others access over our property,we want it to be abundantly clear that if they want to keep going over Walmart's property, to the street, they have to independently negotiate with Walmart for that access right because Walmart wasn't conditioned to require public access easement. That appears in some of the other conditions—for example Condition 15 it's talking about site work that the city would like to see us do on Walmart's property but it says "If permitted by Walmart." Condition #7 talks about the pedestrian easement and it'd like us to continue the public easement over Walmart's property "if permitted by Walmart"—and that"if permitted by Walmart"language was missing from Condition 17— so we want it to be abundantly clear that we are not obligated to give rights that we don't have. Brad Perrigo,Executive Director—Compass Oncology spoke to parking and wayfinding. He noted they are trying to keep patients close to the building with easy access and a single story parking lot is very important to their patients. As for wayfinding—they provide a packet to their patients very carefully explaining how to get to the building. TESTIMONY IN FAVOR—None. TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION—None APPLICANT FINAL COMMENTS Dana Krawzcuk reiterated that they would like a continuation. She noted that they want to make sure that they've hit all of the issues that are of concern to the commission and how they'd addressed them in the material already provided. She went over the various ways they'd November 14, 2016 Page 5 of 11 addressed the known issues. She said they are very interested in anything the commissioners would like them to address in the upcoming written materials. The commissioners gave some suggestions as to what would be helpful for them to see when they come back while the applicant took notes. Some of the comments: • More discussion about is an oncology office actually going to happen—if not,would that matter for our consideration—legally speaking? From my point of view an oncologist office looks good but I'm not sure if it will be an oncology office. Please address that. • I would like more images—3D showing grading—the entire building • I'd like more thoughts going into that wetland on the n/e corner. MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING TO DECEMBER 5 Vice President Feeney moved - I move we continue the hearing, leave the public record open;written testimony is due within 7 days of today, that allows the applicant 7 days to respond to any additional information and then an additional 7 days for staff and planning commission to review that information for the December 5th hearing. President Fitzgerald seconded the motion. All in favor—none opposed. HEARING HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 5 PUBLIC HEARING TIGARD TRIANGLE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN PROPOSAL: Over the past six months, staff and an urban renewal consultant team worked with a Citizen Advisory Council and Technical Advisory Committee to develop a Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan (Plan). On October 4, the City Center Development Agency initiated public review of the proposed Plan, and the Planning Commission is required to hold a public hearing as part of this review process. On November 14, the Planning Commission will be asked to publicly review the proposed Plan for conformance to local goals and objectives and make a recommendation to City Council on its adoption. President Fitzgerald opened the public hearing. STAFF REPORT The staff report is available on-line at the City website one week prior to the hearing. Susan Shanks,Associate Planner, introduced herself and Consultant Elaine Howard of Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC. Susan explained the type of hearing this is and that it is not a land use hearing. It's a hearing required by the ORS457 rules pertaining to Urban Renewal Plans.The statute requires that the city come to the Planning Commission for this public hearing. It's a slightly different kind of hearing. Elaine Howard explained that it's similar to a regular in that staff makes a presentation, the commission asks questions, and then it's open to the public and then rebuttal,if needed —then the commission deliberates and hopefully then makes a motion. November 14,2016 Page 6 of 11 Susan Shanks briefly spoke to the commissioners providing them with a general overview of what"urban renewal" is. Elaine Howard went through a PowerPoint and spoke about how urban renewal works,what it is exactly, the plan background, the schedule, and the plan content. She explained how this goes along with the city's goals and strategic plan. QUESTIONS What do we see from the school district on this with the diversion of the tax revenue monies?They were part of our technical advisory committee and they have not submitted any official comments, they asked us to clarify one of our public handouts about how urban renewal may indirectly affect them. They helped wordsmith that language but they have not expressed any concern. Property taxes are one funding source to that state school fund but there are other funding sources to the state school fund and I think that's why the school districts feel like they can support urban renewal—because they're funding out of the state school fund—not directly from those property taxes. So it's your experience that school districts always support urban renewal districts? I've been doing urban renewal for 11 years and I've never had a school district oppose it during that time frame. What does the financing cost to the district? It depends on whatever the interest rate is when you are actually borrowing funds—so in the report there are assumptions for interest rates at 5%. What are TVF&R's concerns at this point?They are not opposed but don't want to wait 50 years to unfreeze the tax base. Why would someone not support an Urban Renewal district? People don't understand how it works. They think it's a new tax to them, and it's not. However,if you live in a city that has urban renewal,you'll see urban renewal on your tax bill and that helps perpetuate the thought that maybe it's an additional tax but what it shows them is the division of taxes and that you'd be paying that total amount regardless of whether or not there was urban renewal. Urban renewal is very complex and a lot of people just don't understand how it works. Additionally, people don't like the concept of taking money away from other taxing districts—because that's what urban renewal does? If it didn't exist that growth within that area—the taxes off that would go to all those taxing districts. Have there been studies done that Urban Renewal districts conclusively show a better rate of growth or a higher value return—let's say over a 35-year period? In every situation—or does it vary? It varies depending on the size of the cities. For instance, Coos Bay unfortunately is always in a state of recession so they have an urban renewal area—it's been going a long time—the citizens really support that but there just isn't a lot of growth in that city so it's hard for those property tax values to go us.The urban areas are more likely to get more growth in that area.Tigard is prime property—especially with the location of the freeways November 14, 2016 Page 7 of 11 around it. So if you provide the infrastructure there,you're going to get more growth in that area than you would have without. The payments on the debt would be from the incremental increases on the subject property? Yes. If Tigard borrows a bunch of money and ends up being wrong 10 —15 years later; that's not our growth rate and we basically over borrowed.What's the fall-back on that in terms of how we're going to make up that difference and still fund what we've already spent?We cannot place a bond unless we actually have the money coming in that shows you can pay that debt service with a debt service ratio— so you as a city would not go out and place a bond until you already have the amount of money coming in on an annual basis with a savings account—a debt service coverage ratio—to be able to cover those payments. So you don't issue that $188 million up front—you do it as you get enough money to actually make those bond payments. So that protects the city. TESTIMONY IN FAVOR—Jim Long—10730 SW 72"d Ave.,Tigard—turned in written testimony (Exhibit C). He made an argument to add from one to five contiguous commercially- zoned properties to the Tigard Triangle. He showed the commissioners a copy of a petition on which he had several signatures. The petition called for a walk-to residential park on the 1.54 acres behind the Tigard Fred Meyers. He said there were many comments from that petition that he'd included on pages three and four of his testimony. He said there are even more than that at this time. TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION —None. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED DELIBERATION President Fitzgerald noted that she knew Mr. Long had raised some issues and she would like Susan Shanks to revisit what was discussed at the CAC. Susan said Mr. Long had suggested this same idea of expanding the boundary to include those five properties that he spoke just recently about. There was a good discussion among the CAC members but Susan couldn't recall exactly what had been said. She said she did have notes from that meeting however that she would forward along to the commission.The notes describe the pros and the cons that were discussed but ultimately the count was 6 to 2 against expanding the area. So in honoring the CAC's input on that particular note,we did not expand the area to include those specific properties. MOTION Commissioner Muldoon moved: "I move that the Tigard Planning Commission finds that the proposed Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan based upon the information provided in and attached to the staff report and through public testimony, and further recommends that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan." Commissioner Hu seconded. A vote was taken. November 14,2016 Page 8 of 11 All in favor—none opposed. MOTION PASSES SECOND MOTION Commissioner Jelinek moved that the City Council consider expanding the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Boundary with property adjacent to and north of the proposed boundary that includes 1 —5 commercially-zoned lots on Spruce Street. The specific lots to be determined by staff upon consultation with Mr. Long. Commissioner McDowell seconded the motion and a vote was taken. Yay—Commissioners Lieuallen,Jelinek,Muldoon,Middaugh, and McDowell Nay—Commissioners Hu Fitzgerald, Feeney, and Schmidt Abstain—none. MOTION PASSES 5 TO 4 PUBLIC HEARING OPENED CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT PROPOSAL: The City of Tigard proposes a Substantial Amendment to the existing City Center Urban Renewal Plan in Downtown Tigard. The purpose of the Planning Commission hearing is to review the proposed Substantial Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan for its conformance with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, take public testimony,and make a recommendation to the Tigard City Council on adoption. STAFF REPORT The staf report is available on-line at the City website one week prior to the hearing. Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly Sean went over his staff report noting that at the direction of the City Center Development Agency Board, staff had worked with consultants to prepare a draft Substantial Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (Plan Amendment) to expand the boundary of the City Center Urban Renewal Area. On October 4, the CCDA initiated public review of the proposed Plan Amendment, and the Planning Commission is required to hold a public hearing as part of this review process. This evening the Planning Commission is asked to publicly review the proposed Plan Amendment for conformance to local goals and objectives and make a recommendation to City Council for its adoption. Sean went over a Power Point (Exhibit D) to help clarify. Elaine Howard explained that they have refreshed the Urban Renewal plan to conform to the existing Comprehensive Plan.There were also some Transportation System Plan goals that had been addressed and those were 12.2, 12.3, and 12.4. And there was a Tigard Park System Masterplan goal that was added in—and again,it was just refreshed to the current documents. Not adding new projects. She noted the adoption schedule is the same as the Tigard Triangle November 14, 2016 Page 9 of 11 Plan where you have the planning commission hearing tonight—it goes to City Council December 13 and then out for a citywide vote again in May of 2017. Sean Farrelly reported on an action that the City Center Advisory Commission took last week— even though they don't have a formal say in this—they did recommend that the Planning Commission recommend this to council. QUESTIONS What if the voters don't approve? There would be some projects that won't get done. We'd have to prioritize, strategize and focus on projects that could be completed. But the existing area would remain intact with the existing maximum indebtedness—they just wouldn't reach as much of that as they could have if they added in those other properties. TESTIMONY IN FAVOR - None TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION —None. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING DELIBERATION—None. MOTION (RECOMMENDATION) Commissioner Muldoon: "I move that the Tigard Planning Commission finds,based upon the information provided in the staff report, public testimony, and the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Fourth Amendment, that the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Fourth Amendment conforms with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and further recommend that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Fourth Amendment." Commissioner Feeney seconded. There was a vote. All in favor—none opposed. MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL PASSES BRIEFING—Tom McGuire introduced the new City of Tigard Community Engagement Coordinator,Lauren Scott. She was hired in early September and he is excited to have her come to talk about what she is doing for the city—and to basically talk about her program. Lauren spoke briefly to the Commission about how she has never worked in a government position before. Over the past two and a half months she's been immersing herself in the culture—trying to learn the jargon. She thinks of herself as a bridge between the Community Development Department to the citizens of Tigard. If she can't understand what the planners are saying, she knows the citizens can't understand what they're saying. She believes community engagement comes in many forms—events, messaging, and then open communication and November 14,2016 Page 10 of 11 dialog. She believes it's important to get the community engaged early and often. She tries to make things more understandable—more concise. Her job is to help the city in communicating to the public. She believes communication needs to be dynamic—not simply notices that are a piece of paper that just says what's going on—people get it—they throw it out. She tries to make things more interesting. She had worked on the open house—adding elements that make it more interesting to the public. She's on several committees regarding community involvement. She has a 2017 plan in how people can get involved in different events in the city and also how we can expand our opportunities to reach diverse communities. OTHER BUSINESS —Tom McGuire went over the Planning Commission calendar. ADJOURNMENT President Fitzgerald adjourned the meeting at 10:17 p.m. a • Lc2_2 Doreen Laughlin, Planning Commi ion Secretary ../..ztes.444 Al-FEST: President F gerald November 14,2016 Page 11 of 11 . • AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: December 13, 2016 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: Informational Public Hearing - AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND FINDINGS RELATING TO AND APPROVING THE TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF APPROVAL BE PUBLISED This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: December 13, 2016 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. CAti NV. fEe 9571 std DAY-0114C17 To a(2.41 012.Cl 2-2,..; rill foes Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinance(s) T I G A R D STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, if„PJ L(J g ury.9-L1 ,being first duly sworn,by oath, depose and say: I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) (76 /6 which were adopted at the City Council meeting of 1.) 1/3/a 0/ (o , on the 13'�``' day of pra_e_mt4.2✓ , 20 /(0 . 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 2.Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon Signature who Ptfor d Posting Subscribed and sworn before me this t 'J f'Clay of O-P C - , 20L by K t1,1 OFFICIAL STAMP ` CAROL ANN KRAGER �.. ;.. x NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON Notary Public—State of Oreg COMMISSION NO. 924954 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 10,2018 I:WDM\CITY RECORDERS\FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING-ORDINANCE.DOC