OBEC Consulting Engineers ~ C170021 Ctty of Tigard
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER/ 13125.SW Hall Blvd
s Tigard,Oregon 223
AMENDMENT #1 SUMMARY -4171
Phone- (503) 639
FIELD CHANGE ORDER FORM Fax- (503) 684-7297
u-au tl mrd-oiov
Project Title:Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Project Manager: Carla Staedter
Greenway Trail Including a Pedestrian Bridge,
Boardwalk, and Trail Design
OBEC Consulting Engineers Ori ' al Contract#: C170021
Effective Dates: 9/28/16—6/30/19 Chan- e Order/Amendment Amount: $5,824
Accounting String: 420-8000-56005-92051 Amendment Percentage Running Total: 2.5%
AMENDMENT DETAILS
Add Dynamic Pile Testing Services
CHANGE ORDER DETAILS UNIT- QTY UNTT$ 'TOTAL$
Original Contract 229,000
Amendment#1 —change in date only
Amendment#2—Specialized Testing 5,824
TOTAL CONTRACT 234,824
REASONING FOR CHANGE ORDER/AMENDMENT
This specialized testing is required to ensure bridge piles meetspecifications.
BUDGET IMPACT AND REQUIRED ACTIONS
REQ T NG PROJE T MANAGER APPRONTING CITY STAFF
Sl ature Signature
)9 .2r--"
Date Date
Contractor is hereby authorized by the Cit;of Tigard to perform CONTRACTOR
the additional work described below in accordance with the terms
and conditions detailed in the original contract along with all
applicable rules,regulations,and laws that may be in effect for the Signature
work. The unit pricing in the original contract shall apply to all
additional work. A copy of this form, once completed,is to be
forwarded to the Purchasing Office to ensure all changes to the
encumbrances are met. Remember—the cumulative total of
Amendments cannot exceed the ro'eces FY budget. Date
CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
AMENDMENT TO ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
TIEDEMAN RE-ALIGNMENT OF FANNO GREENWAYTRAIL
INCLUDING A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE,BOARDWALK,AND TRAIL DESIGN
(C170021)
AMENDMENT #2
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 28'day of September, 2016, by and between the City of
Tigard,a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as the"City,"and OBEC Consulting Engineers,whose
authorized representative is Nick Robertson, and having a principal being a registered engineer of the State
of Oregon,hereinafter referred to as the"Engineer."
is hereby amended as follows:
3. Engineer's Fee
A. Basic Fee
1) As compensation for Basic Services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement, and for
services required in the fulfillment of Paragraph 1,the Engineer shall be paid on an hourly rate
based upon the"Schedule of Rates"in Exhibit B of this agreement,which shall constitute full
and complete payment for said services and all expenditures which may be made and expenses
incurred, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. The Basic Fee shall not
exceed the amount of
{$229;999,09} Two Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty and
No/100 Dollars ($234,820.00)-without prior written authorization.
Additional Scope
Add to Task 11 Construction Services
Dynamic Pile Testing (PDA Testing,
Shannon&Wilson will perform dynamic testing of 2 test piles (one per bent) during initial drive and also
during restrike after a 72 hour waiting period. The testing consists of attaching strain gages and
accelerometers to each test pile and recording dynamic measurements while the pile is being driven with
an impact hammer. The purpose of our proposal is to perform dynamic load testing (PDA) and signal
matching analysis (CAPVb AP) to compute the nominal resistance of the test piles, and to provide
additional pile driving information such as pile stresses,hammer stroke,and the hammer energy transfer.
PDA testing will be performed during initial drive and during restrike after a specified waiting period
unless waived by the Engineer.
Dynamic testing will be performed on the first pile as it is advanced to the plan tip elevation. Depending
on the results of the testing,the initial drive of the test pile at the second bent may be waved. If the piles
achieve the required nominal resistance during initial drive,the restrike may be waived by the Engineer.
Deliverables/Schedule: Consultant shall perform the PDA testing and CAPWAP analysis and compute
the pile nominal resistance within 72 hours of field testing. A formal report will be issued documenting
the test results at the completion of the testing.
Assumptions:
■ The contractor will be prepared for testing when Shannon &Wilson is requested to mobilize to
the site.
■ The initial drive testing can be performed in less than 8 hours and the restrike testing can be
performed in less than 4 hours.
■ The contractor .till provide access to the piles for installation of the PDA gages.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
undersigned officer and Contractor has executed this Amendment upon signature and date listed below.
CITY OF TIGARD OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Signature Signatur
Ma',--'-- L -
Printed Name Printed(',lame
H-19 -16
Date Date
I
aty
CONTRACT ��
" T.tgard,OvgpaI72
•
PI—MMACHANM ORDER. Fax- (50, 684-72-7
w �:ti rd-ars v
Project Title: Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Project Manager: Carla Staedter
Greenway Trail Including a Pedestrian Bridge,
Boardwalk,and Trail Design
OBEC Consulting Engineers Original Contract#: C170021
Effective Dates: 9/28/16—6/30/19 Chane Order/Amendment Amount:
Accountin Stria : 420-8000-56005-92051 Amendment Percentage Run nin Total:
AM'�� Alhs
Extend contract termination date to 6/30/2019
CHANGE ORDER DETAILS UNIT QTY UNIT$ TOTAL$
Original Contract 229,000
Amendment#1 —change in date only
TOTAL CONTRACT 229,000
Q� �NG£a � A1� l<'
Delayed construction hoping for a favorable bid. The design contract needs to remain open through bridge
fabrication, delivery and construction
AN 4Q AgpqNs
$' qtxW
4D d
PS
Dare
Contractor is hereby authorized by the City of Tigard to perform1 '
the additional work described below in accordance with the terms
and conditions detailed in the original contract along with all
applicable rules,regulations,and laws that may be in effect for the
work. The unit pricing in the original contract shall apply to all
additional work. A copy of this form, once completed,is to be
forwarded to the Purchasing Office to ensure all changes to the
encumbrances are met. Remember— the cumulative total of
Amendments cannot exceed theproject's FY budget. bath
CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
AMENDMENT TO ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
TIEDEMAN RE-ALIGNMENT OF FANNO GREENWAY TRAIL
INCLUDING A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE,BOARDWALK,AND TRAIL DESIGN
C170021
AMENDMENT #1
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 28`h day of September,2016, by and between the City of
Tigard,a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as the"City,"and OBEC Consulting Engineers,whose
authorized representative is Nick Robertson, and having a principal being a registered engineer of the State
of Oregon,hereinafter referred to as the"Engineer."
2. Effective Date and Duration
This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire, unless otherwise
terminated or extended, upon completion of the work or june 30, 2018-une 30, 2019, whichever
comes first. All work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
undersigned officer and Contractor has executed this Amendment upon signature and date listed below.
CITY OF TIGARD OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Signature Signatuo
LI -
Printed Name Printed Name
Date Date
CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON-CONTRACT SUMMARY FORM
THIS FORM MUS T ACCOMPANY EVERY CONTRACT
Contract Title: Tiedeman Re,khgnment of Fanno Greenway Trail Number:
Contractor: OBEC Contract Total: $229,000.00
Contract Overx-iew: This contract provides enguieering sen-ices to complete pathwa:.-relocation and
pedestrian bridge structural design for a relocation of the Fanno Greenway Trail at
Tie.deman Avenue_The protect upgrades a substandard section of dic regional Fanno
Gree.nw a� 'Trail. It is funded bj Metio and managed bs the ('it< of Tigard
Initial Risk Level: ❑ E xtieme. ❑ High []Moderate X Low
Risk Reduction Steps: The consultant,%ill proxide Tigaid's recommended lex el of insurance12er the
professional services contract.
Risk Comments: The project was discussed with Tigard Risk Manager who recommended no changes to
our standard insurance requirements.
Risk Signature: No Signature Required per Risk Manager.
Contract Manager: Carla Staedter Ext: 2788 Department: P)X'Engineering
Type: ❑ Purchase Agreement ❑ Personal Seivice ❑ General Semice k R:;Public Improvement
E] IGA3 "Other: 6� < , Start Date: 9 '28 16 End Date: 6/30/2018
Quotes/Bids,/Proposal. FIRM ORE/RANK
OBF,C 284/1
OT_ K 282/2
KPFF 282/2
Walhs 263/3
Cardno 250/4
Froelich 215/5
Account String: Fund-Division-Account Work Oidet—Actnntv'r fie Amount
FY 2016-17 420-8000-65Q0'5..<,i,. 92051-130 $202,000
FY 2017-18 420-8000-6,5.005<,,-10 92051-leH _ $ 7,000
FY
FY
FY
Ap2rovals - LCRB Date: September 27,2016
Department Comments:
Department Signature:
v
Purchasing Comments. f
Purchasing Signature:
C;itSr Manager ComumgL .
City Manager Signature:
City of Tigard
FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES
QUALIFICATION BASED REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (QBS)
TIEDEMAN RE-ALIGNMENT OF FANNO GREENWAY TRAIL
INCLUDING A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, BOARDWALK, AND
TRAIL DESIGN
Proposals Due: Thursday July 7, 2016 -2:00 p.m. local time
Proposer must include one (1) original hard copy and one (1) electronic copy on a portable USB
drive (thumb drive) of their submittal.
Submit Proposals To: City of Tigard— Contracts &Purchasing Office
Attn: Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Direct Questions To: Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst
Phone: (503) 718-2477
Email: iosephgtigard-or.gov
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 (503) 639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov
PUBLIC NOTICE
QUALIFICATION BASED REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
TIEDEMAN RE-ALIGNMENT OF THE FANNO GREENWAY TRAIL
The City of Tigard is seeking sealed proposals from qualified firms to provide professional services for the
City's Tiedeman Re-alignment of the Fanno Greenway Trail. Proposals will be received until 2:00 p.m. local
time,July 7,2016,at Tigard City Hall's Utility Billing Counter at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.
Proposals will be scored and ranked on a qualification basis and the City will enter into negotiations with the
top ranking firm.
No proposal will be considered unless fully completed in a manner provided in the RFP packet. Facsimile and
electronic (email) proposals will not be accepted nor will any proposal be accepted after the stated due date and
time. Any proposal received after the closing time will be returned to the submitting firm unopened after a
contract has been awarded for the required services.
RFP packets may be downloaded from www.tigard-or.gov/bids or obtained in person at Tigard City Hall's
Utility Billing Counter located at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Proposers are required to certify non-discrimination in employment practices, and identify resident status as
defined in ORS 279A.120. Pre-qualification of proposers is not required. All proposers are required to
comply with the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes and Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Policy.
The City may reject any proposal not in compliance with all prescribed public bidding procedures and
requirements,and may reject for good cause any or all proposals upon a finding of the City if it is in the public
interest to do so.
PUBLISHED: Daily Journal of Commerce
DATE: June 22,2016
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TitlePage--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
Public Notice 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents 3
SECTIONS
Section 1 Introduction 4
Section 2 Proposer's Special Instructions----------------------------------------------------------------------4
Section3 Background-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4 Scope and Schedule of Work-------------------------------------------------------------------------7
Section 5 Proposal Content and Format____ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________10
Section 6 Proposal Evaluation Procedures _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________11
Section 7 Proposal Certification-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------13
Section8 Signature Page----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A Acknowledgement of Addendum----------------------------------------------------------------15
Attachment B Statement of Proposal________________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________16
Attachment C Project Location Map...... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .........17
Attachment D City of Tigard Engineering Services Agreement------------------------------------------18
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 3
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The City of Tigard is seeking sealed proposals from qualified firms to provide Professional Services for the
City's Tiedeman Re-alignment of the Fanno Greenway Trail. Proposals will be received until 2:00 p.m. local
time, Thursday, July 7, 2016 at Tigard City Hall's Utility Billing Counter at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,
Oregon 97223. Proposals will be scored and ranked on a qualification basis and the City will enter into
negotiations with the top ranking firm.
No proposal will be considered unless fully completed in a manner provided in the RFP packet. Facsimile and
electronic (email) proposals will not be accepted nor will any proposal be accepted after the stated due date and
time. Any proposal received after the closing time will be returned to the submitting firm unopened after a
contract has been awarded for the required services.
Proposers are required to certify non-discrimination in employment practices, and identify resident status as
defined in ORS 279A.120. Pre-qualification of proposers is not required. All proposers are required to
comply with the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes and Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Policy.
The City may reject any proposal not in compliance with all prescribed public bidding procedures and
requirements,and may reject for good cause any or all proposals upon a finding of the City if it is in the public
interest to do so.
SECTION 2
PROPOSER'S SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
A. PROPOSED TIMELINES
Wednesday,June 22, 2016 Advertisement and Release of Project Packet
Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 p.m. Deadline for Submission of Proposals
Monday,July 11,2016-jWy 22,2016 Selection and Negotiations
Tuesday,August 23,2016 Award of Contract by LCRB
Thursday, September 1, 2016 Commencement of Services
NOTE: The City reserves the right to modify this schedule at the City's discretion
B. GENERAL
By submitting a proposal, the Proposer certifies that the Proposal has been arrived at independently
and has been submitted without any collusion designed to limit competition.
C. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
The Proposal and all amendments must be signed and submitted no later than 2:00 p.m.,Thursday,
July 7, 2016 to the address below. Each proposal must be submitted in a sealed envelope and
designated with proposal title. To assure that your proposal receives priority treatment, please mark
as follows.
QBS—TIEDEMAN RE-ALIGNMENT OF FANNO GREENWAY TRAIL
City of Tigard—Utility Billing Counter
Attn: Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Proposer shall put their name and address on the outside of the envelope. It is the Proposer's
responsibility to ensure that proposals are received prior to the stated closing time. The City shall not be
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 4
responsible for the proper identification and handling of any proposals submitted incorrectly. Late
proposals, late modification or late withdrawals shall not be considered accepted after the stated bid
opening date and time and shall be returned unopened. Facsimile and electronic (email) proposals will
not be accepted.
D. PROTEST OF SCOPE OF WORK OR TERMS
A Proposer who believes any details in the scope of work or terms detailed in the proposal packet and
sample contract are unnecessarily restrictive or limit competition may submit a protest in writing, to
the Purchasing Office. A protest may be submitted via facsimile. Any such protest shall include the
reasons for the protest and shall detail any proposed changes to the scope of work or terms. The
Purchasing Office shall respond to any protest and,if necessary, shall issue any appropriate revisions,
substitutions, or clarification via addenda to all interested Proposers.
To be considered, protests must be received at least five (5) days before the proposal closing date.
The City shall not consider any protest against award due to the content of proposal scope of work
or contract terms submitted after the established protest deadline. All protests should be directed to
the attention of Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst,and be marked as follows:
RFP Specification/Term Protest
City of Tigard—Contracts and Purchasing Office
Attn: Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
If a protest is received in accordance with section above, the proposal opening date may be extended if
necessary to allow consideration of the protest and issuance of any necessary addenda to the proposal
documents.
E. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND SIGNING
All requested forms and attachments (Signature Page, Acknowledgment Addendum, Statement of
Proposal, etc.) must be submitted with the Proposal and in the required format. The submission and
signing of a proposal shall indicate the intention of the firm to adhere to the provisions described in
this RFP.
F. COST OF PREPARING A PROPOSAL
The RFP does not commit the City to paying any costs incurred by Proposer in the submission or
presentation of a proposal, or in making the necessary studies for the preparation thereof.
G. INTERPRETATIONS AND ADDENDA
All questions regarding this project proposal shall be directed to Joe Barrett,Sr.Management Analyst.
If necessary, interpretations or clarifications in response to such questions will be made by issuance
of an "Addendum" to all prospective Proposers within a reasonable time prior to proposal closing,
but in no case less than 72 hours before the proposal closing. If an addendum is necessary after that
time, the City, at its discretion, can extend the closing date.
Any Addendum issued, as a result of any change in the RFP, must be acknowledged by submitting the
"Acknowledgment of Addendum"with proposal. Only questions answered by formal written addenda
will be binding. Oral and other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect.
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 5
H. BUSINESS LICENSE/FEDERAL TAX ID REQUIRED
The City of Tigard Business License is required. Chapter 5.4 of the Tigard Municipal Code states any
business doing business in the City of Tigard shall pay a City of Tigard Business License. Successful
Contract will be required to present a copy of their City of Tigard Business License at the time of
contract execution. Successful Contractor shall also complete a W-9 form for the City at the time of
contract execution.
I. CITY'S PROJECT MANAGER
The City's Project Manager for this work will be Carla Staedter,who can be reached by phone at(503)
718-2788 or by email at carlagtigard-or.gov.
J. PROPOSAL VALIDITY PERIOD
Each proposal shall be irrevocable for a period of sixty(60) days from the Proposal Opening Date.
K. FORM OF CONTRACT
A copy of the City's standard engineering services agreement, which the City expects the successful
firm or individual to execute, is included as Attachment D. The contract will incorporate the terms
and conditions from this QBS document and the successful proposer's response documents. Firms
taking exception to any of the contract terms shall submit a protest or request for change in accordance
with Section 2.1) "Protest of Scope of Work or Terms"or their exceptions will be deemed immaterial
and waived.
L. TERM OF CONTRACT
The contract for this work is anticipated to commence on or around September 1, 2016. All work
stemming from the contract is anticipated to be completed no later than June 1, 2018.
M. TERMINATION
The contract may be terminated by mutual consent of both parties or by the City at its discretion with
a 30 days' written notice. If the agreement is so terminated, Contractor shall be paid in accordance
with the terms of the agreement.
N. NON-COLLUSION
Proposer certifies that this proposal had been arrived at independently and has been submitted without
collusion designed to limit independent bidding or competition.
P. PUBLIC RECORD
All bid material submitted by bidder shall become the property of the City and is public record unless
otherwise specified. A bid that contains any information that is considered trade secret under ORS
192.501(2) should be segregated and clearly identified as such. This information will be kept
confidential and shall not be disclosed except in accordance with the Oregon Public Records Law,
ORS 192. The above restrictions may not include cost or price information,which must be open to
the public.
SECTION 3
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The City of Tigard has a population of just over 50,000 people and covers an area of 13 square miles. It is
located in southeast Washington County, 15 minutes from downtown Portland. Metro, a metropolitan
planning organization for the Portland region,has provided funding to the City of Tigard to upgrade a segment
of the Fanno Greenway Trail. The Fanno Greenway Trail is a regional trail and the main north-south walking
and cycling route through Tigard. Over 500,000 people use the trail yearly for recreation and transportation.
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 6
Its effectiveness as a transportation facility is significantly reduced by the many gaps and substandard sections
throughout Tigard. This project will resolve a substandard trail issue at SW Tiedeman Avenue. Currently the
Fanno Trail comes to an abrupt end into the SW Tiedeman sidewalk. At this location, site lines of oncoming
traffic are very difficult. Trail users have to find their way to a school crosswalk 500 feet to the south. There
have been safety problems with bikes attempting to make the turn onto the sidewalk and falling into the street
and with trail users trying to cross Tiedeman at this less than safe trail terminus.
The project will re-align the Fanno Greenway Trail so that it crosses Tiedeman Avenue at the existing school
crosswalk. This location provides significantly greater visibility for both trail users and cars traveling along
Tiedeman. The trail realignment will require a new pedestrian bridge over Fanno Creek (a salmon id listed
stream) and a new boardwalk section over wetlands associate with the creek. The trail will also be widened
to the full 10 foot width to meet desired standards for multi-use trails in the region and will meet all ADA
requirements. See Attachment C. for a vicinity map and a conceptual plan for this trail improvement.
The scope below assumes that the bridge and boardwalk will be constructed though design-build after
preliminary design is developed by the selected Consultant. The City has limited experience with the design
to construction delivery process for pedestrian bridges. Consultant may elect to provide an alternative
approach to design and construction that meets the City's specific site and schedule needs.
SECTION 4
SCOPE AND SCHEDULE OF WORK
The following general overview describes items the City has identified are necessary for this project. This is
not intended to be a full list of the services that the Consultant may deem necessary to complete this project
but is offered as a guideline in developing a scope for the project.
Engineering Design, Land Use,Environmental, and Survey_
Task 1. Project Research/Data Collection
• Survey Research. Obtain existing utility and as-built information from the City and Clean Water Services.
Set up the base map of the project area.
• Prepare and confirm preliminary project schedule
• Project Kick-off Meeting. Meet with project team, review project schedule and deliverables.
• Geotechnical Investigation. Evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical
recommendations for the bridge and boardwalk. The investigation will provide conclusions and
recommendations regarding: geology and seismicity, subsurface conditions, groundwater, anticipated
dewatering requirements,excavating conditions, and trench backfill requirements.
Task 2. Design Survey
• Establish Horizontal and Vertical Survey Control. Setup conventional and GPS control and tie existing
monumentation necessary to establish the existing right-of-ways, property lines, and easement locations
within the project limits. Run vertical control from nearest City/County bench mark. Datum will be
based on City of Tigard state plain coordinates.
• Complete topographic design survey including existing topographic features,trees,utilities,etc.within the
project area.
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 7
Task 3. Wetland Delineation,Wildlife Assessment,and Permitting
• Conduct wetland delineation, prepare delineation report, and solicit concurrence from applicable State
Agencies.
• Prepare onsite or offsite wetland mitigation plans. If offsite, the project location will be provided to you
by City staff Purchasing of mitigation banking credits may also be evaluated.
• Determine the Vegetated Corridor condition based on the Natural Resource Assessment guidelines
contained in the Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards. Prepare and submit a
Standard Site Assessment to CWS. Prepare and submit a Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis for buffer
encroachment meeting Design and Construction Standards if applicable. Prepare and provide vegetated
corridor enhancement plans meeting CWS requirements. Solicit Service Provider Letter(SPL) from Clean
Water Services.
• Provide planting specifications for bidding purposes. If required coordinate with the project Engineer to
prepare any grading plans if needed for wetland, stream, or vegetated corridor mitigation.
• Conduct Wildlife Habitat Assessment meeting the requirements the Sensitive Lands Review Criteria as
stated in Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code, Section 18.775- Sensitive Lands. The assessment is
required to show the proposed trail alignment minimizes impacts to significant wildlife habitat while
balancing the community's recreation and environmental educational goals.
• Develop Wetland/Stream Mitigation Plan.
• Prepare a Joint Permit Application QPA) for submittal to the Oregon DSL and USACE. Quantify the
volume of removal/fill resulting from the project and the types of habitat impacted.Hold a pre-application
meeting with the City and jurisdictional agencies at the beginning stages of the project to discuss agency
requirements and approximate timelines for the project. Coordinate with other state and federal agencies,
including the State Historic Preservation Office, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service during informal or formal consultation, to obtain necessary approvals and
authorizations for the project.Provide permit application forms to the City in draft format for review and
comment. Comments received from the City will be incorporated in the final version for submittal to
DSL and USACE.
• Conduct a Biological Assessment to address Threatened and Endangered (T&E) species known to be
located in the vicinity of the project construction area. Prepare any necessary assessment to identify
potential project impacts to Endangered Species Act(ESA)—listed species and their critical habitat.The
analysis will be based on the 60% design and proposed conservation/mitigation measures identified for
the project.The Biological Assessment must include both short-and long-term mitigation measures to be
implemented during the project and must address any National Marine Fisheries Service requirements for
the project.
• Prepare an historic and archaeologic resources report if required by permitting agencies.
• Note: All fees for permitting will be paid by the City of Tigard.
Task 4. Preliminary Geometry and Layout
• Provide preliminary bridge and geometry through the project with regard to bridge clearance,bridge
length,boardwalk length,and bridge type for one bridge alternative and suitable to prepare bridge
documents for fabricator (design/build process)
Task 5. Engineering Design, Construction Plans and Coordination with Fabricator
• Prepare 60% construction documents: Preliminary drawings to include: Title sheet; existing conditions
plans,bridge and boardwalk plan and profile sheets,and foundation plans to supported bridge fabrication.
Include hard surface pathway design,water quality design, grading and erosion control plans and details
as needed. Vegetated corridor, stream, and wetland mitigation plans and details as required.
• Prepare 90% construction documents, and specifications: Include revisions to the 60% plans based on
comments received from the City.
RFP–Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close–Thursday,July 7, 2016–2:00 pm Page 8
• Prepare 100% construction documents, and specifications. Include revisions to the 90% plans based on
comments received from the City.
• Coordinate with bridge fabricator throughout process to ensure proper coordination of design/build
process.
Task 6. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling/Zero-Foot Rise Analysis
• Review and verify the regulatory model.
• Prepare a hydrologic model for the Fanno Greenway Trail Re-alignment at Tiedeman
• Perform hydraulic modeling to evaluate proposed City trail improvements and its potential impact to the
Fanno Creek floodplain.
• Prepare a zero-foot rise certification.
• Provide project coordination with City staff to ensure the pathway alignment meets the zero-foot rise
criteria within the regulatory floodplain.
Task 7. Stormwater Design and Anals
Prepare Stormwater Alternatives Analysis and Report. Complete Stormwater Management Report
Task 8. Bidding Assistance
• Conduct a Pre-bid meeting at the City of Tigard. Respond to bidder inquiries. Prepare Addenda during
the bidding process as necessary. Review bid pricing with City project manager during the protest
period.
Construction Services
• Provide submittal review, comments, and approval to the City within 3 business days of receipt of
submittal.
• Respond to RFI's during construction process and provide responses to RFI's within 3 business days
of submittal.
• Construction Administration/Site Observation:
➢ Review contractor pay requests, quantity verification, and provide recommendations to the City
project manager.
➢ Review change orders and provide recommendations to the City project manager.
➢ Provide periodic construction consultation on an on-call basis.
• Record Drawings: Prepare record drawings showing the as constructed facilities and incorporating
drawings from the bridge/boardwalk fabricator. Base record drawings on construction observation,
contractor provided notes, and survey verification. Survey verification to include the following:
➢ Provide horizontal locations of bridge boardwalk and new trail segments.
➢ Provide vertical data including of bridge boardwalk and new trail segments.
➢ Provide drawings in PDF and AutoCAD format.
• Project Closeout: Final walk through with City staff and contractor. Provide project files as required
by City.
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 9
Project Schedule
Contract Award LCRB August 23,2016
Notice to Proceed September 1, 2016
Planning and Predesign September 6, 2016 to November 15, 2016
Wetland Delineation/Survey September 6, 2016 to September 26, 2016
60%Design December 15,2016
90%Design January 30, 2017
Contracting with Bridge Fabricator February 15,2017 to February 30, 2017
Issue Permit Documents to Regulatory Agencies January 3, 2017
100%Project Design March 15,2017
Bridge and Boardwalk Fabrication March 29,2017 to June 30, 2017
Final Design,Plans, Specs, Estimate April 17,2017
Advertise for Construction Services May 18,2017
Permits Back from Regulatory Agencies May 18,2017
Bid and Award July 6, 2017
Pre-Construction July 10, 2017
Construction within Sensitive Area July 15,2017 to Sept. 30,2017
Construction outside of Sensitive Areas June 15, 2017 to October 30,2017
Re-Open Fanno Greenway Trail November 13,2017
Final Planting in Mitigation Areas (if needed) March 1, 2018
Project Completion June 1, 2018
The schedule above is for reference only and may be subject to change by the City.
SECTION 5
PROPOSAL CONTENT AND FORMAT
A. FORMAT
To provide a degree of consistency in review of the written proposals, firms are requested to prepare
their proposals in the standard format specified below. Proposals are to be limited to 15 pages (not
including title page, transmittal letter, table of contents, or appendices),with each side counting as a
page, 8-1/2 x 11 paper size, 11 point minimum font.
1. Title Page
Proposer should identify the QBS Title,name and title of contact person, address, telephone
number, fax number, email address and date of submission.
2. Transmittal Letter
The transmittal letter should be no more than two (2) pages long and should include as a
minimum the following:
a. A brief statement of the Proposer's understanding of the project and services to be
performed;
b. A positive commitment to perform the services within the time period specified, starting
and completing the project within the deadlines stated in this QBS; and the names of
persons authorized to represent the Proposer, their title, address and telephone number
(if different from the individual who signs the transmittal letter.)
3. Table of Contents
The table of contents should include a clear and complete identification by section and page
number of the materials submitted.
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 10
4. Consultant Project Team
Describe the proposed project team, including subconsultants. Provide a proposed project
team organization chart and clearly delineate areas of work responsibility. Explain why this
team and organization is well-suited to this work.
5. Project Understanding,Approach, and Interest
Describe in narrative form,with tables or other figures as desired,the Proposers understanding
of the type of work required for this project. Discuss approach/process to construct a
pedestrian bridge/boardwalk and path re-alignment in this location. Discuss your plan to
meet the project schedule shown above in Section 4. Explain why the project team is
interested in this work.
B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Provide a brief description of any other services that your firm could provide the City such services
would be contracted for on an "as needed"basis likely via an amendment to the contract so long a
not drastically altering the scope of work.
C. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please provide any other information you feel would help the Selection Committee evaluate your
firm for this project.
D. DISPUTES
Should any doubt or difference of opinion arise between the City and a Proposer as to the items to be
furnished hereunder or the interpretation of the provisions of this QBS,the decision of the City shall
be final and binding upon all parties.
E. CITY PERSONNEL
No Officer, agent, consultant or employee of the City shall be permitted any interest in the contract.
SECTION 6
PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES
A. SELECTION AND EVALUATION PROCESS
A Selection Committee assembled by the City will review the written proposals. Proposals will be
evaluated to determine which ones best meet the needs of the City. After meeting the mandatory
requirements, the proposals will be evaluated on technical qualifications. The Selection Committee
will select the Proposer which best meets the City's needs based upon its evaluation of a firm's
proposal. Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the following:
1. Completed Proposal submitted on time Pass Fail
2. An original hard copy and one electronic copy on USB drive Pass Fail
3. Transmittal letter Pass Fail
4. Consultant Team and Project Manager 30 points
5. Project Understanding and Approach 40 points
6. Consultant Team Past Experience 30 points
TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS 100 POINTS
B. PRESENTATION/INTERVIEW
At the option of the City, the top scoring proposers (based on the criteria points) may be asked to
make a presentation of their proposal. This will provide an opportunity to clarify or elaborate on the
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 11
proposal, but will not, in any way provide an opportunity to change any fee amount originally
proposed. The City's Project Manager will schedule the time and location of these presentations and
notify the selected firms. If the City elects to conduct a presentation/interview process, 25 criteria
points will be assigned to the process and will be added to the participating Proposers'total points.
C. INVESTIGATION OF REFERENCES
The City reserves the right to investigate references and the past performance of any Proposer with
respect to its successful performance of similar projects, compliance with specifications and contractual
obligations,its completion or delivery of a project on schedule and its lawful payment of employees and
workers.
D. CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSALS
The City reserves the right to obtain clarification of any point in regards to a proposal or to obtain
additional information necessary to properly evaluate or particular proposal. Failure of a Proposer to
respond to such a request for additional information or clarification could result in rejection of their
proposal.
E. INTENT OF AWARD
Upon review of the proposals submitted,the City may negotiate a scope of work and a general services
agreement with one firm,or may select one or more firms for further consideration.
F. PROTEST OF AWARD
In accordance with Tigard Public Contracting Rule 30.135,any adversely affected Proposer has seven
(7) calendar days from the date of the written notice of award to file a written protest.
G. PROPOSAL REJECTION
The City reserves the right to:
1. Reject any or all proposals not in compliance with all public procedures and requirements;
2. Reject any proposal not meeting the specifications set forth herein;
3. Waive any or all irregularities in proposals submitted;
4. Reject all proposals;
5. Award any or all parts of any proposal;and
6. Request references and other data to determine responsiveness.
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7, 2016—2:00 pm Page 12
SECTION 7
PROPOSAL CERTIFICATIONS
Non-discrimination Clause
The Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for
services, because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap or age with regard to,but not limited
to,the following:employment upgrading,demotion or transfer;recruitment or recruitment advertising;layoffs
or termination;rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training;rendition of services. It
is further understood that any contractor who is in violation of this clause shall be barred from receiving
awards of any purchase order from the City,unless a satisfactory showing is made that discriminatory practices
have terminated and that a recurrence of such acts is unlikely.
Agreed by: Larry Fox, PE
Firm Name: OBEC Consulting Engineers
Address: 5000 Meadows Road, Suite 420
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
Resident Certificate
Please Check One:
® Resident Vendor: Vendor has paid unemployment taxes and income taxes in this state during the last
twelve calendar months immediately preceding the submission of this proposal.
Or
❑ Non-resident Vendor:Vendor does not qualify under requirement stated above.
(Please specify your state of residence: )
Officer's signa e:
Type or print officer's name: Larry Fox,PE
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7,2016—2:00 pm Page 13
SECTION 8
SIGNATURE PAGE
The undersigned proposes to perform all work as listed in the Specification section and that all articles supplied
under any resultant contract will conform to the specifications herein,
The undersigned agrees to be bound by all applicable laws and regulations, the accompanying specifications
and by City policies and regulations.
The undersigned,by submitting a proposal,represents that:
A) The Proposer has read and understands the specifications.
B) Failure to comply with the specifications or any terms of the Request for Proposal may disqualify
the Proposer as being non-responsive.
The undersigned certifies that the proposal has been arrived at independently and has been submitted without
any collusion designed to limit competition.
The undersigned certifies that all addenda to the specifications has been received and duly considered and
with all addenda have been included in this proposal:
Addenda: No. through No. inclusive.
We therefore offer and make this proposal to furnish services at the price(s)indicated herein in fulfillment of
the attached requirements and specifications of the City.
Name of firm: OBEC Consulting Engineers
Address: 5000 Meadows Road,Suite 420
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
Telephone Nu v 503.620.6103 Fax Number: 503.620.8416
By: �, Date: 7/7/2016
11 gq ture of Authorize-661 If partnership,signature of one partner.)
Typed Name/Title: Larry Fox,PE, President
If corporation,attest: Larry Fox, PE, President
(Corporate Officer)
❑X Corporation ❑ Partnership ❑ Individual
Federal Tax Identification Number(TIN): 93-0552628
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7,2016—2:00 pm Page 14
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA
Project Title:_Tiedemen Re-Alignment of the Fanno Greenway Trail
Close: Thursday�uly 7.2016-2:00 p.m.
I/WE HAVE RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING ADDENDA (Z{none received. write `None Received'):
1. /VovE /zEGE/UrD 3.
2. 4.
7/7/2016
41a,eureof Proposer
ident
Tide
OBEC Consulting Engineers
Corporate Name
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7,2016—2:00 pm Page 15
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL
Name of Consultant: OBEC Consulting Engineers
Mailing Address: 5000 Meadows Road,Suite 420
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
Contact Person: Nick Robertson,PE, SE
Telephone: 971.634.2020 Fax: 503.620.8416 Email: nrobertson@obec.com
accepts all the terms and conditions contained in the City of Tigard's Request for Proposal for engineering
services on the Tiedeman Re-alignment of Fanno Creek Trail project and the attached engineering services
agreement(.,1 chment D):
7/7/2016
at e of authorized reprealive Date
Larry Fox,PE 971.634.2021
Type or print name of authorized representative Telephone Number
Larry Fox,PE 971.634.2021
Type or print name of person(s) authorized to negotiate contracts Telephone Number
REFERENCES
City of Eugene 541.505.4703
Reference#1 Telephone Number
Commerce Street Pedestrian Bridge Kerry Werner
Project Title Contact Individual
City of Tualatin 503.691.3036
Reference#2 Telephone Number
Myslony Bridge Dominique Huffman
Project Title Contact Individual
Jackson County 541.774.6231
Reference#3 Telephone Number
Bear Creek Greenway Trail Jenna Marmon
Project Title Contact Individual
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7,2016—2:00 pm Page 16
ATTACHMENT C
RN:ON t'•R' .
yYf C.M -
NORTH p4w,p�R ss
flNtl
RlM1Mk S 9i = m. .
Y
kik il.Riy Ly4rfR[a(c:OR' P J = _ _
4S
lq
k LrtiVE xi 3t f ��tiR
Gp ,FG
s M1 cry v*y Rkr.Y
n n :y
S.W� _ ysP4 'Yrs d]✓� 5
r'ONrvER 5r mHp�R 'k �
Rt 9E Rfw
RYLS s i
♦1 4 y
d' YRRIQ*3T
-
R�L
Tei R�ieyEk So OR0lq♦sT ARt
EC�cEW EjOO St E
MI
fR�E 6R
ELROS E'
_ Y4iRR£y4
Vicinity Map
SAME�3 afie ++
� FMWG GREfK
.T
AS✓HAFT FERE
H_` •.r RFCON57RlMFiY1Af:
• r.cryo sr
Rte'` ,
Exrsrnvc R r
d4C�'S]'IJC � ,'�.'u1RQwrit,K � • � ^/�P
PEUEYMO
-
4�+ f_'BP'OCE
�.
t0'W7PE PA VEn i%?Rk
Pu".�.,.QDOAq,MfNi TIEDEMAN TRAIL REALIGNMENT
tlb�
""'L`"" *.
&� AT FANNO CREEK
131",CREuN+
fAi': sPS-8Pa-0352
ATTACHMENT 1
Conceptual Plan Tiedeman Re-Alignment of the Fanno Creek Trail
RFP—Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail
Close—Thursday,July 7,2016—2:00 pm Page 17
C I -?00a
1
ATTACHMENT D
CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
TIEDEMAN RE-ALIGNMENT OF FANNO GREENWAY TRAIL
INCLUDING A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE,BOARDWALS,AND TRAIL DESIGN
THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this 28d day of September,2016,by and between the
City of Tigard, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and OBEC Consulting
Engineers, whose authorized representative is Nick Robertson, and having a principal being a
registered engineer of the State of Oregon,hereinafter referred to as the "Engineer."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City's 2016-2017 fiscal year budget provides for Engineering services for the
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Greenway Trail project;and
WHEREAS,the accomplishment of the work and services described in this Agreement is necessary
and essential to the public works improvement program of the City;and
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Engineer to render professional engineering services for
the project described in this Agreement, and the Engineer is willing and qualified to perform such
services;
THEREFORE,in consideration of the promises and covenants contained herein,the parties hereby
agree as follows:
1. Engineer's Scope of Services
The Engineer shall perform professional engineering services relevant to the Project in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein,and as provided in Exhibit A,which
is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this Agreement.
2. Effective Date and Duration
This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire, unless
otherwise terminated or extended,upon completion of the work or June 30,2018,whichever
comes first.All work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this
Agreement.
3. Engineer's Fee
A. Basic Fee
1) As compensation for Basic Services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement,and
for services required in the fulfillment of Paragraph 1, the Engineer shall be paid on
an hourly rate based upon the "Schedule of Rates" in Exhibit B of this agreement,
which shall constitute full and complete payment for said services and all expenditures
which may be made and expenses incurred,except as otherwise expressly provided in
this Agreement.The Basic Fee shall not exceed the amount of Two Hundred Twenty-
nine Thousand and No/100 Dollars($229,000.00)without prior written authorization.
2) The parties hereto do expressly agree that the Basic Fee is based upon the Scope of
Services to be provided by the Engineer and is not necessarily related to the estimated
construction cost of the Project. In the event that the actual construction cost differs
City of Tigard J 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 (503) 639-41711 www.tigard-
or.gov
from the estimated construction cost, the Engineer's compensation will not be
adjusted unless the Scope of Services to be provided by the Engineer changes and is
authorized and accepted by the City.
B. Payment Schedule for Basic Fee
Payments shall be made upon receipt of billings based on the work completed. Billings
shall be submitted by the Engineer periodically, but not more frequently than monthly.
Payment by the City shall release the City from any further obligation for payment to the
engineer for service or services performed or expenses incurred as of the date of the
statement of services. Payment shall be made only for work actually completed as of the
date of invoice. Payment shall not be considered acceptance or approval of any work or
waiver of any defects therein.
C. Payment for Special Services
Only when directed in writing by the City, the Engineer shall furnish or acquire for the
City the professional and technical services based on the hourly rate schedule as described
in Exhibit B of this contract for minor project additions and/or alterations.
D. Certified Cost Records
The Engineer shall furnish certified cost records for all billings pertaining to other than
lump sum fees to substantiate all charges. For such purposes,the books of account of the
Engineer shall be subject to audit by the City.The Engineer shall complete work and cost
records for all billings on such forms and in such manner as will be satisfactory to the City.
E. Contract Identification
The Engineer shall furnish to the City its employer identification number, as designated
by the Internal Revenue Service, or social security number, as the City deems applicable.
F. Payment—General
1) Engineer shall pay to the Department of Revenue all sums withheld from employees
pursuant to ORS 316.167.
2) Engineer shall pay employees at least time and a half pay for all overtime worked in
excess of 40 hours in any one week except for individuals under the contract who are
excluded under ORS 653.010 to 653.261 or under 29 USC sections 201 to 209 from
receiving overtime.
3) Engineer shall promptly, as due, make payment to any person, co-partnership,
association or corporation, furnishing mtdical, surgical and hospital care or other
needed care and attention incident to sickness or injury to the employees of Engineer
or all sutras which Engineer agrees to pay for such services and all moneys and sums
which Engineer collected or deducted from the wages of employees pursuant to any
law, contract or agreement for the purpose of providing or paying for such service.
4) The City certifies that sufficient funds are available and authorized for expenditure to
finance costs of this contract.
5) Engineer shall make payments promptly, as due, to all persons supplying services or
materials for work covered under this contract. Engineer shall not permit any lien or
claim to be filed or prosecuted against the City on any account of any service or
materials furnished.
6) If Engineer fails, neglects or refuses to make prompt payment of any claim for labor,
materials, or services furnished to Engineer, sub-consultant or subcontractor by any
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 2
person as such claim becomes due,City may pay such claim and charge the amount of
the payment against funds due or to become due to the Engineer.The payment of the
claim in this manner shall not relieve Engineer or their surety from obligation with
respect to any unpaid claims.
4. Ownership of Plans and Documents: Records
A. The field notes, design notes, and original drawings of the construction plans, as
instruments of service, are and shall remain, the property of the Engineer; however, the
City shall be furnished,at no additional cost,one set of previously approved reproducible
drawings as well as storage device such as thumb drive or sd card in "DW-G" or "DXF"
format, of the original drawings of the work. The City shall have unlimited authority to
use the materials received from the Engineer in any way the City deems necessary.
B. The City shall make copies, for the use of and without cost to the Engineer, of all of its
maps, records, laboratory tests, or other data pertinent to the work to be performed by
the Engineer pursuant to this Agreement,and also make available any other maps,records,
or other materials available to the City from any other public agency or body.
C. The Engineer shall furnish to the City, copies of all maps, records, field notes, and soil
tests which were developed in the course of work for the City and for which compensation
has been received by the Engineer at no additional expense to the City except as provided
elsewhere in this Agreement.
5. Assignment/Delegation
Neither party shall assign,sublet or transfer any interest in or duty under this Agreement without
the written consent of the other and no assignment shall be of any force or effect whatsoever
unless and until the other party has so consented. If City agrees to assignment of tasks to a
subcontract,Engineer shall be fully responsible for the acts or omissions of any subcontractors
and of all persons employed by them,and neither the approval by City of any subcontractor nor
anything contained herein shall be deemed to create any contractual relation between the
subcontractor and City.
6. Engineer is Independent Contractor
A. The City's project director, or designee, shall be responsible for determining whether
Engineer's work product is satisfactory and consistent with this agreement,but Engineer
is not subject to the direction and control of the City. Engineer shall be an independent
contractor for all purposes and shall be entitled to no compensation other than the
compensation provided for under Section 3 of this Agreement.
B. Engineer is an independent contractor and not an employee of City. Engineer
acknowledges Engineer's status as an independent contractor and acknowledges that
Engineer is not an employee of the City for purposes of workers compensation law,public
emplovee benefits law, or any other lav-. All persons retained by Engineer to provide
services under this contract are employees of Engineer and not of City. Engineer
acknowledges that it is not entitled to benefits of an; kind to which a City employee is
entitled and that it shall be solely responsible for workers compensation coverage for its
employees and all other payments and taxes required by law. Furthermore, in the event
that Engineer is found by a court of law or an administrative agency to be an employee of
the City for any purpose,City shall be entitled to offset compensation due,or to demand
repayment of any amounts paid to Engineer under the terms of the agreement,to the full
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 3
extent of any benefits or other remuneration Engineer receives (from City or third party)
as a result of said finding and to the full extent of any payments that City is required to
make (to Engineer or to a third party) as a result of said finding.
C. The undersigned Engineer hereby represents that no employee of the City or any
partnership or corporation in which a City employee has an interest, has or will receive
any remuneration of any description from the Engineer, either directly or indirectly, in
connection with the letting or performance of this Agreement, except as specifically
declared in writing.
D. If this payment is to be charged against Federal funds, Engineer certifies that he/she is
not currently employed by the Federal Government and the amount charged does not
exceed his/her normal charge for the type of service provided.
E. Engineer and its employees, if any, are not active members of the Oregon Public
Employees Retirement System and are not employed for a total of 600 hours or more in
the calendar year by any public employer participating in the Retirement System.
F. Engineer shall obtain,prior to the execution of any performance under this Agreement,a
City of Tigard Business License. The Tigard Business License is based on a calendar year
v-ith a December 31st expiration date.New businesses operating in Tigard after June 30th
of the current year will pay a pro-rated fee though the end of the calendar year.
G. Engineer is not an officer, employee, or agent of the City as those terms are used in ORS
30.265.
7. Indemnity
A. The City has relied upon the professional ability and training of the Engineer as a material
inducement to enter into this Agreement. Engineer represents to the City that the work
under this contract will be performed in accordance with the professional standards of
skill and care ordinarily exercised by members of the engineering profession under similar
conditions and circumstances as well as the requirements of applicable federal, state and
local laws,it being understood that acceptance of an Engineer's work by the City shall not
operate as a waiver or release.Acceptance of documents by City does not relieve Engineer l
of any responsibility for design deficiencies,errors or omissions.
B. Claims for other than Professional Liability. Engineer agrees and shall indemnify,defend, n
save and hold harmless the City of Tigard, its officers, employees, agents, and r
representatives from all claims, suits, or actions and all expenses incidental to the
investigation and defense thereof, of whatsoever nature, including intentional acts
resulting from or arising out of the activities of Engineer or its subcontractors, sub-
consultants, agents or employees in er ormance of this contract at both to -and appeal
level,whether or not a trial or appeal ever takes place including any hearing before federal
or state administrative agencies.. If any aspect of this indemnity shall be found to be illegal
or invalid for any reason whatsoever,such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validit
of the remainder of this indemnification.
C. Claims for Professional Liability. Engineer agrees and shall indemnify, defend, save and
hold harmless the City of Tigard,its officers, employees,agents,and representatives from
all claims, suits, or actions and all expenses incidental to the investigation and defense
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 4
thereof, arising out of the professional negligent acts, errors or omissions of Engineer or
its subcontractors, sub-consultants, agents or employees in performance of professional
services under this agreement. Any work by Engineer that results in a design of a facility
that is not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities shall be
considered a professionally negligent act, error or omission.
D. As used in subsections B and C of this section,a claim for professional responsibility is a
claim made against the City in which the City's alleged liability results directly or indirectly,
in whole or in part, from the quality of the professional services provided by Engineer,
regardless of the type of claim made against the City in performance of this contract. A
claim for other than professional responsibility is a claim made against the City in which
the City's alleged liability results from an act or omission by Engineer unrelated to the
quality of professional services provided by Engineer in performance of this contract.
8. Insurance
Engineer and its subcontractors shall maintain insurance acceptable to City in full force and effect
throughout the term of this contract.Such insurance shall cover risks arising directly or indirectly
out of Engineer's activities or work hereunder,including the operations of its subcontractors of
any tier. Such insurance shall include provisions that such insurance is primary insurance with
respect to the interests of City and that any other insurance maintained by City is excess and not
contributory insurance with the insurance required hereunder.
The policy or policies of insurance maintained by the Engineer and its subcontractors shall
provide at least the following limits and coverages:
A. Commercial General Liability Insurance
Engineer shall obtain, at Engineer's expense, and keep in effect during the term of this
contract, Comprehensive General Liability Insurance covering Bodily Injury and Property
Damage on an"occurrence"form(CG 20101185 or equivalent).This coverage shall include
Contractual Liability insurance for the indemnity provided under this contract.The following
insurance will be carried:
Coverage Limit
General Aggregate $3,000,000
Products-Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000
Personal&Advertising Injury $1,000,000
Each Occurrence $2,000,000
Fire Damage (Any one fire) $50,000
B. Professional Liability
Engineer shall obtain, at Engineer's expense, and keep in effect during the term of this
contract, Professional Liability Insurance covering any damages caused by any actual or
alleged negligent act, error or omission in the rendering of or failure to render Professional
Services. Combined single limit per claim shall not be less than$2,000,000,or the equivalent.
Annual aggregate limit shall not be less than$3,000,000 and filed on a"claims-made" form.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 5
C. Commercial Automobile Insurance
Engineer shall also obtain,at Engineer's expense,and keep in effect during the term of the
contract (Symbol 1 or Symbols 8 and 9 as applicable) Commercial Automobile Liability
coverage on an"occurrence" form including coverage for all owned,hired,and non-owned
vehicles.The Combined Single Limit per occurrence shall not be less than$2,000,000.
If Contractor operates a personally-owned vehicle for business use under this contract, the
Contractor shall obtain, at Contractor's expense, and keep in effect during the term of the
contract, business automobile liability coverage for all owned vehicles on an "occurrence"
form.The Combined Single Limit per occurrence shall not be less than$2,000,000.
D. Workers' Compensation Insurance
The Engineer,its subcontractors,if any,and all employers providing work,labor or materials
under this Contract are subject employers under the Oregon Workers' Compensation Law
and shall comply with ORS 656.017,which requires them to provide workers'compensation
coverage that satisfies Oregon law for all their subject workers.Out-of-state employers must
provide Oregon workers' compensation coverage for their workers who work at a single
location within Oregon for more than 30 days in a calendar year. Engineers who perform
work without the assistance or labor of any employee need not obtain such coverage. This
shall include Employer's Liability Insurance with coverage limits of not less than$1,000,000
each accident.
E. Additional Insured Provision
All policies aforementioned, other than Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability,
shall include the City its officers,employees,agents and representatives as additional insureds
with respect to this contract.Coverage will be endorsed to provide a"per project"aggregate.
F. Extended Reporting Coverga
If any of the aforementioned liability insurance is arranged on a "claims-made" basis,
Extended Reporting coverage will be required at the completion of this contract to a duration
of 24 months or the maximum time period the Engineer's insurer will provide such if less
than 24 months. Engineer will be responsible for furnishing certification of Extended
Reporting coverage as described or continuous "claims-made" liability coverage for 24
months following contract completion. Continuous "claims-made" coverage will be
acceptable in lieu of Extended Reporting coverage, provided its retroactive date is on or
before the effective date of this contract.Coverage will be endorsed to provide a"per project"
aggregate.
G. Insurance Carrier Rating
Coverage provided by the Engineer must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed
acceptable by the City.All policies of insurance must be written by companies having an A.M.
Best rating of"A-VII" or better,or equivalent.The City reserves the right to reject all or any
insurance carrier(s)with an unacceptable financial rating.
H. Self-Insurance
The City understands that some Contractors may self-insure for business risks and the City
will consider whether such self-insurance is acceptable if it meets the minimum insurance
requirements for the type of coverage required. If the Contractor is self-insured for
commercial general liability or automobile liability insurance the Contractor must provide
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 6
evidence of such self-insurance. The Contractor must provide a Certificate of Insurance
showing evidence of the coverage amounts on a form acceptable to the City. The City
reserves the right in its sole discretion to determine whether self-insurance is adequate.
I. Certificates of Insurance
As evidence of the insurance coverage required by the contract, the Engineer shall furnish a
Certificate of Insurance to the City. No contract shall be effective until the required
Certificates of Insurance have been received and approved by the City. The certificate will
specify and document all provisions within this contract and include a copy of Additional
Insured Endorsement. A renewal certificate will be sent to the address below prior to
coverage expiration.
J. Independent Contractor Status
The service or services to be rendered under this contract are those of an independent
contractor.Contractor is not an officer,employee or agent of the City as those terms are used
in ORS 30.265.
K. PrimM PrimaCoverage Clarification
The parties agree that Engineer's coverage shall be primary to the extent permitted by law.
The parties further agree that other insurance maintained by the City is excess and not
contributory insurance with the insurance required in this section.
L. Cross-Liability Clause
A cross-liability clause or separation of insureds clause will be included in all general liability
and commercial automobile policies required by this contract.
A certificate in form satisfactory to the City certifying to the issuance of such insurance will be
forwarded to:
City of Tigard
Attn:Contracts and Purchasing Office
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard,Oregon 97223
At the discretion of the City-, a copy of each insurance policy, certified as a true copy by an
authorized representative of the issuing insurance company may be required to be forwarded to
the above address.
Such policies or certificates must be delivered prior to commencement of the work.
The procuring of such required insurance shall not be construed to limit Engineer's liability
hereunder. Notwithstanding said insurance,Engineer shall be obligated for the total amount of
any damage,injury,or loss caused by negligence or neglect connected with this contract.
9. Termination Without Cause
At any time and without cause, City shall have the right in its sole discretion, to terminate this
Agreement by giving notice to Engineer. If City terminates the contract pursuant to this
paragraph,it shall pay Engineer for services rendered to the date of termination.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 7
10. Termination With Cause
A. City may terminate this Agreement effective upon delivery of written notice to Engineer,
or at such later date as may be established by City,under any of the following conditions:
C.
1) If City funding from federal, state, local, or other sources is not obtained and
continued at levels sufficient to allow for the purchase of the indicated quantity of
services.This Agreement may be modified to accommodate a reduction in funds.
2) If Federal or State regulations or guidelines are modified, changed, or interpreted in
such a way that the services are no longer allowable or appropriate for purchase under
this Agreement.
3) If any license or certificate required by law or regulation to be held by Engineer, its
subcontractors, agents, and employees to provide the services required by this
Agreement is for any reason denied,revoked,or not renewed.
4) If Engineer becomes insolvent, if voluntary or involuntary petition in bankruptcy is
filed by or against Engineer, if a receiver or trustee is appointed for Engineer, or if
there is an assignment for the benefit of creditors of Engineer.
Any such termination of this agreement under paragraph(A) shall be without prejudice to
any obligations or liabilities of either party already accrued prior to such termination.
B. City,by written notice of default(including breach of contract)to Engineer,may terminate
the whole or any part of this Agreement:
1) If Engineer fails to provide services called for by this agreement within the time
specified herein or any extension thereof, or
2) If Engineer fails to perform any of the other provisions of this Agreement, or so fails
to pursue the work as to endanger performance of this agreement in accordance with
its terms, and after receipt of written notice from City, fails to correct such failures
within ten days or such other period as City may authorize.
3) If Engineer fails to eliminate a conflict as described in Section 14 of this agreement.
The rights and remedies of City provided in the above clause related to defaults (including
breach of contract)by Engineer shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights
and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement. If City terminates this Agreement
under paragraph (B), Engineer shall be entitled to receive as full payment for all services
satisfactorily rendered and expenses incurred, an amount which bears the same ratio to
the total fees specified in this Agreement as the services satisfactorily rendered by Engineer
bear to the total services otherwise required to be performed for such total fee;provided,
that there shall be deducted from such amount the amount of damages,if any, sustained
by City due to breach of contract by Engineer. Damages for breach of contract shall be
those allowed by Oregon lave-, reasonable and necessary attorney fees, and other costs of
litigation at trial and upon appeal.
11. Non-Waiver
The failure of City to insist upon or enforce strict performance by Engineer of any of the terms
of this Agreement or to exercise any rights hereunder, should not be construed as a waiver or
relinquishment to any extent of its rights to assert or rely upon such terms or rights on any future
occasion.
Tiedeman Re—Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 8
12. Method and Place of Giving Notice, Submitting Bills and MaldngPg'yrnents
All notices,bills and payments shall be made in writing and may be given by personal delivery,
mail, or by fax. Payments may be made by personal delivery, mail, or electronic transfer. The
following addresses shall be used to transmit notices,bills,payments,and other information:
CITY OF TIGARD OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Attn: Carla Staedter Attn: Nick Robertson,Project Manager
Address: 13125 SVC'Hall Blvd. Address: 5000 Meadows Rd Ste 420
Tigard,Oregon 97223 Lake Oswego,OR 97035
Phone: (503) 718-2788 Phone: (503)620-6103
Email: carlaQtigard-or.g_ov Email: nrobertson@obec.com
and when so addressed, shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States mail,postage
prepaid, or when so faxed, shall be deemed given upon successful fax. In all other instances,
notices,bills and payments shall be deemed given at the time of actual delivery.Changes may be
made in the names and addresses of the person to whom notices,bills and payments are to be
given by giving written notice pursuant to this paragraph.
13. Merger
This writing is intended both as a final expression of the Agreement between the parties with
respect to the included terms and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the
Agreement. No modification of this Agreement shall be effective unless and until it is made in
writing and signed by both parties.
14. Professional Services
The City requires that services provided pursuant to this agreement shall be provided to the City
by an Engineer,which does not represent clients on matters contrary to City interests. Further,
Engineer shall not engage services of an engineer and/or other professional who individually,
or through members of his/her same firm, represents clients on matters contrary- to City
interests.
Should the Engineer represent clients on matters contrary to City interests or engage the services
of an engineer and/or other professional who individually,or through members of his/her same
firm, represents clients on matters contrary to City interests, Engineer shall consult with the
appropriate City representative regarding the conflict.
After such consultation, the Engineer shall have seven (7) days to eliminate the conflict to the
satisfaction of the City. If such conflict is not eliminated within the specified time period, the
agreement may be terminated pursuant to Section 10 (B-3) of this agreement.
15. Force Majeure
Neither City not Engineer shall be considered in default because of any delays in completion
and responsibilities hereunder due to causes beyond the control and without fault or negligence
on the part of the parties so disenabled,including but not restricted to, an act of God or of a
public enemy,civil unrest,volcano,earthquake,fire,flood,epidemic,quarantine restriction,area-
wide strike,freight embargo,unusually severe weather or delay of subcontractor or supplies due
to such cause;provided that the parties so disenabled shall within ten days from the beginning
of such delay,notify the other party in writing of the cause of delay and its probable extent.Such
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenu ay Trail Page 9
notification shall not be the basis for a claim for additional compensation. Each party shall,
however,make all reasonable efforts to remove or eliminate such a cause of delay or default and
shall, upon cessation of the cause, diligently pursue performance of its obligation under the
Agreement.
16. Non-Discrimination
Engineer agrees to comply,%ith all applicable requirements of federal and state civil rights and
rehabilitation statues,rules,and regulations.Engineer also shall comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990,ORS 659A.142,and all regulations and administrative rules established
pursuant to those laws.
17. Errors
Engineer shall perform such additional work as may be necessary to correct errors in the work
required under this Agreement without undue delays and without additional cost.
18. Extra (Changes)Work
Only the City's Project Manager may authorize extra(and/or change)work.Failure of Engineer
to secure authorization for extra work shall constitute a waiver of all right to adjustment in the
contract price or contract time due to such unauthorized extra work and Engineer thereafter
shall be entitled to no compensation whatsoever for the performance of such work.
19. Governing Law
The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the provisions of the
laws of the State of Oregon. Any action or suits involving any question arising under this
Agreement must be brought in the appropriate court of the State of Oregon.
20. Compliance With AVplicable Law
Engineer shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
work under this Agreement,including those set forth in ORS 279A,279B,and 279C.
21. Conflict Between Terms
It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict
between the terms of this instrument in the proposal of the contract, this instrument shall
control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the said terms of said
proposal conflicting herewith.
22. Access to Records
City shall have access to such books,documents,papers and records of Engineer as are directly
pertinent to this Agreement for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and
transcripts.
23. Audit
Engineer shall maintain records to assure conformance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement,and to assure adequate performance and accurate expenditures within the contract
period. Engineer agrees to permit City, the State of Oregon, the federal government, or their
duly authorized representatives to audit all records pertaining to this Agreement to assure the
accurate expenditure of funds.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 10
24. Severability
In the event any provision or portion of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable or invalid
by any court of competent jurisdiction,the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall
not be affected to the extent that it did not materially affect the intent of the parties when they
entered into the agreement.
25. Representations and Warranties
Engineer represents and warrants to the City that:
A. Engineer has the power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement.
B. This Agreement, when executed and delivered, is a valid and binding obligation of
Engineer,enforceable in accordance with its terms.
C. Engineer(to the best of Engineer's knowledge,after due inquiry), for a period of no fewer
than six calendar years (or since the firm's inception if less than that) preceding the
effective date of this Agreement, faithfully has complied with:
1) All tax laws of this state,including but not limited to ORS 305.620 and ORS chapters
316, 317,and 318;
2) Any tax provisions imposed by a political subdivision of this state that applied to
Engineer, to Engineer's property, operations, receipts, or income, or to Engineer's
performance of or compensation for any work performed by Engineer;
3) Any tax provisions imposed by a political subdivision of this state that applied to
Engineer, or to goods, services, or property,whether tangible or intangible,provided
by Engineer;and
4) Any rules,regulations,charter provisions,or ordinances that implemented or enforced
any of the foregoing tax laws or provisions.
D. Any intellectual property rights or such delivered to the City under this Agreement, and
Engineer's services rendered in the performance of Engineer's obligations under this
Agreement, shall be provided to the City free and clear of any and all restrictions on or
conditions of use,transfer,modification,or assignment,and shall be free and clear of any
and all liens,claims,mortgages,security interests,liabilities,charges,and encumbrances of
any kind.
26. Compliance with Tax Laws
A. Engineer must,throughout the duration of this Agreement and any extensions,comply with
all tax laws of this state and all applicable tax laws of any political subdivision of the State of
Oregon.For the purposes of this Section,"tax laws"includes all the provisions described in
subsection 25.C. 1) through 4) of this Agreement.
B. Any violation of subsection A of this section shall constitute a material breach of this
Agreement. Further, any violation of Engineer's warranty, in subsection 25.0 of this
Agreement,that the Engineer has complied with the tax laws of the State of Oregon and the
applicable tax laws of any political subdivision of this state also shall constitute a material
breach of this Agreement. Any violation shall entitle the City to terminate this Agreement,
to pursue and recover any and all damages that arise from the breach and the termination of
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 11
this Agreement,and to pursue any or all of the remedies available under this Agreement,at
law,or in equity,including but not limited to:
1) Termination of this Agreement,in whole or in part;
2) Exercise of the right of setoff,and withholding of amounts otherwise due and owing
to Engineer,in an amount equal to State's setoff right,without penalty;and
3) Initiation of an action or proceeding for damages, specific performance, declaratory
or injunctive relief. The City shall be entitled to recover any and all damages suffered
as the result of Engineer's breach of this Agreement,including but not limited to direct,
indirect, incidental and consequential damages, costs of cure, and costs incurred in
securing a replacement Engineer.
These remedies are cumulative to the extent the remedies are not inconsistent, and the City
may pursue any remedy or remedies singly, collectively, successively, or in any order
whatsoever.
27. Complete Agreement
This Agreement,including the exhibits,is intended both as a final expression of the Agreement
between the Parties and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms. In the event of an
inconsistency between a provision in the main body of the Agreement and a provision in the
Exhibits, the provision in the main body of the Agreement shall control. In the event of an
inconsistency between Exhibit A and Exhibit B,Exhibit A shall control.
No waiver,consent,modification,or change of terms of this Agreement shall bind either party
unless in writing and signed by both parties. Such waiver, consent, modification, or change if
made, shall be effective only in specific instances and for the specific purpose given.There are
no understandings,agreements,or representations,oral or written,not specified herein regarding
this Agreement.Engineer,by the signature of its authorized representative,hereby acknowledges
that he/she has read this Agreement, understands it and agrees to be bound by its terms and
conditions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized
undersigned officer and Engineer has executed this Agreement on the date hereinabove first written.
Awarded by Tigard's Local Contract Review Board at their September 27,2016 meeting.
CITY OF TIGARD OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS
r
By: Marty Wine, City Manager By:Autho ed Contractor Representative
/0 /9 12-01 (.o
Date Date
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 12
Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Background:
The Fanno Creek Trail is a regional trail and the main north-south walking and cycling route
through Tigard. Its effectiveness as a transportation facility is significantly reduced by the many gaps
and substandard sections throughout Tigard.This project will resolve a substandard trail issue at SV'
Tiedeman Avenue. Currently the Fanno Trail comes to an abrupt end into the SW Tiedemann
sidewalk.At this location, site lines of oncoming traffic are very difficult.Trail users have to find
their way to a school crosswalk 500 feet to the south.There have been safety problems with bikes
attempting to make the turn onto the sidewalk and falling into the street and with trail users trying to
cross Tiedeman at this less than safe trail terminus.
The project will re-align the Fanno Greenway Trail so that it crosses Tiedeman Avenue in order to
align with the existing school crosswalk at Tiedeman Avenue.This location provides significantly
greater visibility for both trail users and cars traveling along Tiedeman. The trail realignment u.-ill
require a new pedestrian bridge over Fanno Creek and a new boardwalk section over sensitive
habitat associated with the creek.The trail will also be widened to the full 10 foot width to meet
desired standards for multi-use trails in the region and will meet all ADA requirements.
Organization of Work Tasks:
The follow work tasks are provided to develop an effective and comprehensive project delivery plan
and provide a basis for the level of effort and design fee required for successful project delivery.
Task 1 Project Management
Provide management and coordination for all tasks included in this Scope.Manage Services
performed by Consultant's staff and sub-consultants and coordinate with the City as needed on
work tasks performed by others.
Subtask 1.1 Overall Project Management
Provide project management and design oversight for the consultant team.Prepare and maintain a
milestone delivery schedule in Microsoft Project format.Plan and direct Quality processes in
accordance with Consultant's existing Quality Program,including the development of a project
specific Project Quality Plan (PQP). The PQP shall document the required quality assurance reviews
that must be undertaken by the Consultant for each project deliverable. Collect and respond to City
review comments. Keep the cit; informed of work progress,project issues,resolutions and changes
affecting the design, schedule or project budget by providing a monthly progress report with each
monthly invoice. Submit project invoices monthly,including a breakdown of hours spent by each
individual on the project.
Assumptions
• Project Management tasks are assumed to be nine months in duration to match the overall
design schedule.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 13
Deliverables
• Invoices and progress reports (monthly)
• Milestone Delivery Schedule (v-ithin 10 working days of NTP, and modifications as required
by the City)
Schedule
Task shall be continuous throughout project design phase duration.
Subtask 1.2 Project Meetings
Prepare and lead the targeted production meetings listed below as an integral part of Project
delivery.The purpose of these meetings is to clearly identify and document the City's Project goals,
objectives and design preferences;to establish a high level of efficiency and design quality;and to
promote accurate communications between the City and the consultant team at key Project
milestones.Meetings shall take place at the City's Engineering Office or by conference call,as
appropriate.
Assumptions
• Effort includes preparation of meeting materials,agendas, travel time and
meeting minutes.
• Project Kickoff Meeting—up to two (2) Consultant team members shall meet
with City design staff for up to two (2) hours at the City's offices to discuss the
overall work plan,project schedule,design criteria,alternatives analysis and
stakeholder concerns.
• Predesign Meeting—up to two (2) Consultant team members shall meet with
City design staff for up to two (2) hours at the City's offices to review comments
to the predesign report.This meeting shall take place following the delivery of
the predesign report,and a two week review period.Review comments shall be
provided by the City in an excel worksheet at least two days before the predesign
review meeting.
• 90% design review meeting—up to two (2) Consultant team members shall meet
with City design staff for up to two (2) hours at the City's offices to discuss plan
review comments.This meeting shall take place following the delivery of the
90%PS&E Package and a two week review period. Review comments shall be
provided by the City in an excel worksheet at least two days before the design
review meeting.
• Pre-bid meeting—up to two (2) Consultant team members shall meet with City
design staff and potential bidders for up to one (1) hour at the City's offices to
discuss the project bid.
• Project Coordination Phone Calls—Consultant project manager shall participate
in biweekly 30 minute project coordination calls,on an as needed basis, for up to
nine (9) months.
Deliverables
• Meeting agendas will be delivered electronically 48 hours prior to each meeting
• Meeting minutes will be delivered electronically vE-ithin one (1) week of meeting date
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 14
•
Task 2 Survey
Provide labor,equipment and materials to complete the surveying needs for the project. Surveying
on this project includes establishing a control network,performing topographic mapping within the
defined topographic limits,and filing a Pre-Construction Survey with the Washington County
Surveyors Office.
All deliverables must be reviewed and stamped by Consultant's Professional Surveyor (PLS)
registered in the State of Oregon.
The limits of topographic surveying and right-of-wap resolution for this project are as follows:
• Tiedeman Avenue from center line 200 feet southeasterly, from a point 50 feet south of the
trail connection on the west side of Tiedeman Avenue to a point 50 feet north of the Fanno
Creek trail connection on the east side of Tiedeman Avenue. Fanno Creek Trail from the
centerline 20 feet northerly and 20 feet southerly from the intersection with SW Tiedeman
Avenue extending easterly along the trail 300-ft.
• Hydraulic Cross-sections 300-ft upstream and 500—ft downstream at 100-ft intervals from
the eastern edge of the existing Tiedeman Avenue bridge
sem+
Figmre 1:Approximate Project Smrvey Limits
Subtask 2.1 Horizontal and Vertical Control
Establish horizontal and vertical survey control for the project using the Oregon Coordinate
Reference System (OCRS)Portland Zone,NAD 83(2011) Epoch 2010. International Survey Feet
units will be used. The vertical datum for this project will be NAVD 88 Datum.
Deliverables
• ASCII File containing the OCRS coordinates for all network control points.
• One scanned copy of the original field notes in*.pdf format.
• City of Tigard benchmark datasheets for benchmark(s) used.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 15
Subtask 2.2 Right-of-way and Property line resolution
Perform right-of-way research (surveys,plats,deeds, etc.) to locate existing monuments and to
resolve existing pathway centerlines and right-of-way lines within the project limits.
Obtain Lot Book Reports for each of the properties adjoining trail.Perform a field survey of
existing monuments subject to disturbance by the project or needed to resolve existing right-of-way
lines. If the initial search is inconclusive,a second search will be made utilizing coordinates
calculated from nearby found monuments and/or additional measurements. Survey at least one
Public Land Survey System(PLSS) corner tie for ROW descriptions and future filing of the survey.
Resolve the existing property lines for Woodard City Park in the vicinity of the work.Parcel tax lot
ID numbers, owner names,property addresses (if applicable),existing property lines (entire
property), and existing right-of-way lines will be compiled on a right-of-way map.
It is assumed that the consultant v•ill not impact any existing moments and shall not need to prepare
a pre-construction record of survey to show the existing property lines as resolved in Task 2.2 to
document the factors pertaining to this resolution,and to show control established in Task 2.1
Assumptions:
• 4 existing properties adjoin the project limits.
Deliverables
• One scanned copy of the original field notes in*.pdf format.
• One pdf file for each of the 4 Lot Book Reports.
Subtask 2.3 Topographic Survey and Base Mapping
Prepare and submit survey notification letter to the City Project Manager for review. Distribute
approved letter by mail to distribution list provided by City of Tigard,if requested.
Coordinate and attend a pre-survey meeting with City engineering and survey staff.
Provide all labor,equipment,and materials to perform a topographic survey for the project.Tie all
topographic features,man-made or natural within the topographic survey limits described in this
SOV('. This will include,but not be limited to,edge of pavement,curb, existing utilities, fences,
lights,wells,storm drainage structures,culverts,roof drains,valves,landscaping, driveways, fences,
buildings,walks, signs,and striping.Any other affected utilities or features will be tied as required
for design. Locate all trees,including size and species of trees 6 inches (DBH) or greater.Tie grade
breaks to create an accurate terrain model.
Gather the field data necessary to show utility locations in the base mapping for pathway design.
Request underground utilities to be marked in the field within the topographic survey limits as
identified above. Use the statewide utility notification system(OUNC) to submit a pre-survey locate
request.A private utility locator will be used to identify utilities within the park property. Record in
the field notes the utility ownerships.All storm and sewer manholes,cleanouts and inlets invert
elevations,v ill be measured and recorded. Elevations will be recorded on rims of manholes and
inlets. Invert elevations of culverts will be obtained as well as size and material type.
Measure the elevation of the lowest wires that cross street or path intersections on all overhead
utilities within the topographic survey limits.
Tie wedand delineation and geotechnical borings and show them in the survey base map.
Reduce field survey data and prepare a topographic base map compatible with A icrostation (version
to be determined by client),v-ith 1 foot minor and 5 feet major contour intervals.A InRoads V8i
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 16
DTM will be created using a combination of survey data including breaklines, features, and spot
elevations.
Deliverables
• Survey Notification Letter.
• 1"=50' scale topographic survey Base map in Microstation compatible Format
• DTM compatible with Inroads V8i
• OUNC locate request
• Copy of original survey field notes
Task 3 Environmental Documentation and Permits
Pro--ide the City with professional consultation services to complete the environmental compliance
documentation for the proposed Tiedeman Re-Alignment project in Tigard, OR. It is assumed that
there will be no cultural resources (archaeological or historical)impacts and no cultural resources
documentation will be prepared as part of this contract.
Subtask 3.1 Review Data and On-going Communication
Consultant Environmental Specialist shall obtain and review existing information. Coordinate and
communicate with City regarding environmental tasks and assumptions,verify schedule, and
estimate impacts of proposed alternatives. Participate in two (2) environmental meetings for the
Project including an environmental kick-off meeting with the City and Project Team to discuss
Project design;potential areas of impacts;and avoidance,minimization,and conservation measures.
Consult with the City,NMFS,USF%X'S,and ODFW to obtain the most current information on the
presence of all proposed, threatened and endangered species.
Summarize the information review results,progress of environmental tasks,and estimated project
impacts in the environmental section of the preliminary report.
Assumptions
• City will assist in obtaining any existing background information prepared for the project
Deliverables
Provide a summary of the information collected in this task as part of Task 13.1,Predesign
Report.
Subtask 3.2 Wetland Delineation& Report
Complete a wetland field delineation and OHWM demarcation for the project study area (PSA). The
PSA is defined as the area within the topographic survey limits described in Task 2. Use available
data (including but not limited to: soil surveys,aerial photos,National Wetland Inventory maps) as
well as data gathered in the field to document the presence or absence of wetlands within the project
study area. Consultant shall:
• Place flags in the field to show wetland and upland sample plot locations and the wetland
boundaries.
• Place flags in the field to show the OHWM elevation of all jurisdictional surface raters.
Assess the OHWM elevation using accepted field indicators within 50 feet upstream and
downstream of the PSA.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 17
• Appropriately label and number the flags to identify their function and prepare sketch maps
of approximate wetland boundaries with numbering of flags or stakes to be provided prior
to site surveys for Project base mapping.
• Determine the average active channel width (ACVD for inclusion in the subsequent
permitting documentation tasks.
Prepare a Wetland/Waters of the U.S.Delineation Report (Wetland Delineation Report) in
accordance with DSL standards. Consultant's report shall include all wetland data sheets obtained in
the field. Prepare appropriate graphics to accompany the report and shall include a site location map,
NV11 map,Local Wetland Inventory(LV I) map (if available), soil survey map,and representative
photographs. Consultant's Wedand Delineation Report shall also include wetland delineation
boundary mapping(figures) as finalized by Consultant.
Determine wetland/waters boundaries in accordance with the criteria and methods described in the
1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(Environmental Laboratory Technical Report
Y-87-1) and appropriate Regional Supplements.
Assumptions
• PSA will include only City right-of-way or City owned properties. If private properties are
added to the PSA,rights-of-entry for completing all necessary field work will be obtained by
the City prior to wetland field work.
• DSL will require a fee for review of the Wetland Delineation Report. City is responsible for
payment of this fee and for all mitigation costs.
• City will review the draft Wetland Delineation Report and provide comments to Consultant
within two (2)weeks of receipt of the draft.
Deliverables
Flag the boundaries of wetlands and waters inside the Project Study Area.
Draft and Final Wetland Delineation Report.
Schedule
Wetland field work will be completed within four (4)weeks of receiving NTP or whenever ROEs
for affected properties are received.The Draft wetland delineation report will be completed within
four (4)weeks of completing field work.
Subtask 3.3 Clean Water Services (CWS) Site Assessment
Prepare a CWS Standard Site Assessment Report to obtain a Service Provider Letter for the Project.
The CWS Standard Site Assessment Report shall outline the result of the field evaluation and
document the Project's compliance with the current CMTS Design and Construction Standards
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 18
(R&O 07-20) Chapter 3. The CWS Standard Site Assessment Report willrequire,at a minimum,the
following information and documentation:
• Review and analysis of all data obtained during Task 3.1.
• Assessment of the vegetated corridors within the PSA
• Analysis of R&O 07-20 criteria and applicability to the proposed development.
• Completion of the Sensitive Areas Certification Form.
• Preparation of the Standard Site Assessment Report,to include:
o A description of the PSA and adjacent properties,including a discussion of any off-
site wetlands and waters.
o A discussion of the existing vegetated corridor width,plant communities identified,
and the overall condition of the vegetated corridor area.
o A brief discussion of the proposed Project and the buffer enhancement
opportunities identified during Task 3.1 field work.
o Copies of all required site figures including a Project Vicinity Map,and the Existing
Conditions,Proposed Development,and Final Conditions Figures (if necessary).
o Copies of all completed data sheets prepared under Task 3.1 (if necessary).
o A color photographic record documenting existing site conditions.
Once submitted, the Consultant shall track the application and respond to CWS requests for
additional information in a timely manner.
Assumptions
• CWS will not require any on-site visits or personal meetings.All follow-up communication
will be accomplished through telephone and/or email correspondence.
• All Service Provider Letter fees are the responsibility of the City.
Deliverables
• One(1) draft Standard Site.assessment in Word format electronically via email
• One (1) final Standard Site Assessment as a hard copy
Schedule
The draft Standard Site Assessment will be provided to the City within three (3)weeks following
acceptance of the Predesign.The final version will be provided within three (3)weeks following
receipt of City comments on draft.
Subtask 3.4 Joint Permit Application
Prepare a Joint Permit Application (JPA) and Functional Assessment for a USACE Section 404
Nationwide Permit,DEQ Section 401 '%X'ater Quality Certification and a DSL permit,to authorize
work within jurisdictional waters and wetlands within the PSA.
Provide pre-submittal coordination with representatives of the USACE and DSL to confirm
permitting requirements and application procedures. If necessary, conduct a pre-application meeting
at the offices of the USACE and DSL(or on-site) to review the Project plans and to assess initial
Agency comments on the Project. Prepare drawings,maps,photographs,project descriptions,and
additional information for inclusion in the JPA. Provide engineering plans, concept drawings, site
plan details,and project description information as required to quantify and document wetland and
waters impacts for the JPA. Prepare permitting documents for City signature and shall submit
required application materials directly to Agencies.
_Xddress comments and questions from the DSL,USAGE,DEQ,and NRTFS to facilitate the
permitting process.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 19
Assumptions
• City is responsible for obtaining City Land Use Department signatures on the permit
application
• One round of revisions to the JPA based on City comments.
• The potential wetland and water impacts will be minimal and will be authorized according to
the Nationwide Permit Program administered by the USACE.This scope of work does not
include preparation for an Individual Permit(IP) application to the USACE.
• Due to the varied nature of post-submittal coordination,Consultant time is limited to 8
hours of office review and coordination time for post-submittal coordination.
• Geotechnical drilling will not be required below-jurisdictional waters or wetlands.
• Wetland mitigation will be satisfied by bu)ing credits at a wetland mitigation bank.
• City will be responsible for payment of mitigation payment and DSL submittal fees.
• Consultant's best professional judgment,based upon the functions and values presented in
the Judgmental Method in the Guidebook for Hydrogeomorphic (HGM)-based Assessment
of Oregon Wetland and Riparian Sites (Adamus 2001),will be used for evaluating wetlands
within the project study area (PSA).
Deliverables
• Draft and final JPA.
• Wetland Functional Assessment
Schedule
The draft JPA will be submitted to City for review within four(4)weeks of receiving approval of
Predesign.
Subtask 3.5 ESA Compliance Documentation
Consultant shall use the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) SLOPES programmatic biological
opinion (BO) to evaluate the effects of the project on Endangered Species Act(ESA) listed fish
species that may be impacted by the project.Prepare programmatic SLOPES V documentation to
obtain the Section 404 permit from the USACE. Coordinate with the USACE, the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS),Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL), Oregon Department of Fish
and Wildlife (ODFV),and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to obtain the
information required by the USACE and NMFS to complete the programmatic documentation. It is
anticipated that one on-site visit with NMFS and the USACE will be required for this task.
Assumptions
• IXUe new bridges are typically not covered,NbiFS will allow the use of SLOPES for the
proposed bridge.The project will meet all other programmatic biological opinion conditions
thus requiring no compensatory mitigation.
• Project will not require geotechnical drilling within wetlands or waters.
• ESA/SLOPES mitigation design and coordination is excluded from this scope.
Deliverables
Draft and final programmatic BO documentation.
Schedule
Programmatic BO documentation will be submitted with Task 3.4
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 20
Subtask 3.6 ODFW Fish Passage Plan
It is assumed that all work will occur above ordinary high water and that an ODFW Fish Passage
Plan will not be required.
Subtask 3.7 NPDES 1200-C Permit Application
It is assumed that total ground disturbance for the project will be less than 0.5 Acres and as a result
the 1200-C Permit will not be required.
Task 3.8 Prepare Preliminary Site Restoration Plans
Construction of the proposed bridge and path will result in temporarily disturbed areas requiring site
rehabilitation. Consultant shall prepare a Preliminary Site Restoration Plan for the site.Preliminary
plans shall be designed based on existing conditions as observed from site reconnaissance,provided
site assessments, surveys,and shall adhere to all permit requirements. Consultant shall make one site
visit to review native species and anticipated areas of impact. Preliminary plans shall include the
following:
Table providing proposed species, size,and estimated quantities of plant materials required
for appropriate re-vegetation within the bridge replacement site,
■ Plan graphic depicting the location and identification of plant materials to be used within all
areas proposed for rehabilitation.
■ Preliminary estimated cost for site rehabilitation.
■ Planting outlined in any required Urban Forestry Plan and/or tree removal permit
Deliverables/Schedule:
Consultant shall:
■ Include Preliminary Site Restoration Plans vith the deliverables for JPA Task.
Task 3.9 Prepare 90%and Final Site Restoration Plans
Consultant shall develop site rehabilitation planting plans, cost estimate,and specifications for
construction. Site rehabilitation shall be limited to areas vithin the PSA. Final plans shall be stamped
by a Landscape Architect registered in Oregon. Rehabilitation planting plans shall be designed based
upon the Preliminary Site Restoration Plan,and shall adhere to all permit requirements. Consultant
shall incorporate corrections into 90%and 100%plans as required based on comments received
from the preliminary review. 90%and 100%plans shall include the following:
■ Table providing proposed species,size, and estimated quantities of plant materials required
for appropriate re-vegetation within the bridge replacement site,
■ Drawings and details that identify the type,location,and density of proposed plantings
within all areas proposed for rehabilitation.Two plan sheets are anticipated.
■ Construction notes and details depicting appropriate installation of restoration materials.
■ Develop Special Provisions
Deliverables/Schedule:
Consultant shall:
■ Include 90%Site Restoration PS&E in the Advance PS&E Package
■ Include Final Site Restoration PS&E in the Final PS&E Package
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 21
Task 3.10 Land Use and Other Local Permits
The project is anticipated to require several City or other local permits or approvals,including:
■ Stormwater Connection Permit (CWS approval)
■ Limited Development Review(CWS review)
■ Tree Removal Permit for tree impacts in sensitive lands
■ The city is expected to handle the Sensitive Lands Review(Type III) for impacts to the
Fanno Creek drainage way, floodplain,and Goal 5 Safe Harbor riparian area.
■ All Building Permits are assumed to be handled by the city
Consultant shall prepare application forms and supporting documents necessary to obtain the above
listed permits. Supporting documents may include:
- Urban Forestry Plan
- CWS Site Development Application
- Tree Removal Application
- Wildlife Habitat Assessment
All applications and documentation will meet the requirements outlined in the applicable sections of
the City of Tigard Development Code and/or CWS Design and Construction Standards. It is
assumed that alls support applications will be completed and turned over to the city to submit and
coordinate with the appropriate review agencies.Any modifications to the applications will be
completed by the city.
City shall coordinate with CWS to determine which applications and approvals are necessary.
Applications or documentation identified as required by CWS or City but not listed above and
additional level of coordination may require an amendment to this contract.
Assumptions
The proposed project has been adopted as part of the City's TSP and/or bicycle and pedestrian
pathways plan.
No variances to Section 18.775.090 shall be required.
No Plan amendments shall be required.
The habitat areas map is accurate and no detailed delineation shall be required.
All permit application and review fees are the responsibility of the City.
Deliverables
Draft and Final local permit applications and supporting documents,as outlined above and
required by reviewing agencies.
Schedule
Draft land use permit applications and supporting documents shall be submitted within four(4)
weeks of receiving the CWS Service Provider Letter from the city. Final applications and supporting
documents shall be submitted within 2 weeks of receiving City review-comments.
Task 4 Geotechnical Investigation
This phase of work will provide a subsurface investigation to support the design of the proposed
pedestrian bridge and boardwalk.Consultant work shall include site subsurface investigation,development
of geotechnical design parameters and engineering recommendations for the proposed bridge
foundations,and development of geotechnical construction considerations.Consultant shall summarize
geotechnical findings in a geotechnical engineering report.The geotechnical scope of services will consist
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenw•ay Trail Page 22
of review of existing data and site reconnaissance,subsurface explorations and laboratory testing,
geotechnical engineering analysis,geotechnical report preparation,review of geotechnical related plans and
specifications.
Subtask 4.1 Data Review and Site Reconnaissance
Consultant shall review available existing data provided by agency including,but not limited to,
bridge as-built drawings,previous geotechnical reports,and available in-house borings in the project
vicinity. Consultant shall conduct a geologic reconnaissance of the site. Consultant shall identify the
geologic conditions at the project site,any geologic hazards present and their impacts to the
proposed project elements. Proposed boring locations will be staked or painted on the ground.
Deliverables
• Include site reconnaissance notes with task 4.4
Subtask 4.2 Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing
Consultant shall conduct one drilled borings with a small drill rig that v.ill be transported by a four
wheeler and by hand at the approximately location of the north bridge abutment. Disturbed and
undisturbed samples will be collected at 2.5-foot intervals to a depth of 15 feet and at 5-foot
intervals between 15 and 30 feet.All field work shall be observed and recorded by a geologist or
geotechnical engineer. Consultant shall drill two hand auger borings up to 15 feet at the south bridge
abutment and the proposed boardwalk location to verify the soil conditions.
Consultant shall perform laboratory tests on disturbed and undisturbed soil samples obtained from
the explorations to characterize the subgrade soils and to develop soil parameters for slope stability
analysis and the trail embankment and bridge foundation design.The laboratory testing may consist
of up to three (3) moisture content measurements,one (1) particle size distribution analyses,and one
(1)Atterberg Limit determination.
Assumptions:
• Site access will be arranged by Agency no permits are required.
• Drilling can be completed during the day with a small drill rig.
• No soil or groundwater contamination is present on or near the site.
• All drilling permits will be paid by agency if required.
Deliverables:
• Include boring logs,locations,and site conditions with Task 4.4.
• Include laboratory test results with Task 4.4.
Subtask 4.3 Geotechnical Engineering Analysis
Consultant shall complete a geotechnical analysis,provide design parameters and provide design and
construction recommendations based upon the field investigation and laboratory test results.The
engineering evaluation and analyses will be performed in accordance with the ODOT Geotechnical
Design Manual(April 2012).The geotechnical analysis shall include the following:
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 23
• A site-specific seismic hazard evaluation will be performed including the peak horizontal
acceleration on rock for 475-year and 975-year return period ground motions,applicable Seismic
Performance Category,and site hazards due to potential liquefaction and lateral spreading;
• Evaluation and development of recommendations for bridge foundation design;
• Design and construction recommendations for fills and approach embankments including global
stability,settlement,and bearing capacities.
• Design and construction recommendations for the proposed boardwalk.
Deliverables
• Include geotechnical analysis results and all design and construction recommendations with Task
4.4
Subtask 4.4 Geotechnical Engineering Report
The Geotechnical Engineering Report shall be prepared in accordance with the most current version of
the ODOT foundation design and report writing guidelines.Consultant will develop one Foundation
Data Sheet for the project.
Deliverables
• Submit a revised Draft Geotechnical Engineering Report that includes a summary of field
investigations,analysis results,and recommendations for support of the proposed pedestrian
bridge and boardwalk design.
• Submit a Final Geotechnical Engineering Report,%ithin two(2)weeks upon receipt of comments.
Subtask 4.5 Review of Plans and Specifications
Consultant shall review geotechnical-related plans and specifications. Consultant shall review the
incorporation of geotechnical data and recommendations from the Final Geotechnical Engineering Report
into the 100%PS&E.
Deliverables
• Provide review comments by email and notes in the design plans
Task 5 Hydraulic and Stormwater Studies
Subtask 5.1 Hydraulic Analysis and Report
Provide a hydraulic analysis for the Project site. Perform the following tasks for the bridge site as
necessary to complete the preparation of the Hydraulic deliverables.
Review Existing Data/Site Inspection
Obtain and review available data and models related to hydraulics at the Project site.Visit and
inspect the Project site.Assess stream channel,scour conditions,identify sections for the hydraulic
model,and estimate hydraulic model parameters. Review existing soil conditions,existing drainage
patterns,potential locations for storm water infiltration and drainage conditions for stormwater
runoff analysis.
Hydraulic Analysis
Develop the 2-year, 10-year,50-year, 100-pear and 500-year flows for Fanno Creek in the vicinity of
the new bridge crossing.Develop one (1) site specific hydraulic model for the Project.The site
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 24
specific hydraulic model must contain three (3) conveyance alternatives: (1) the "natural" channel,
(2) the proposed structure,and (3) a floodway analysis.
A no-rise analysis will be performed for the Project site.The no-rise analysis will be documented
within the Hydraulic Report.
Scour Analysis and Abutment Protection Design
Perform scour analyses for the hydraulic conditions resulting from the design alternative in
accordance with the current ODOT Hydraulics Manual.The analysis will include combinations of
scour types to determine what scour potential exists. Using Agency,HEC-18,and HEC-23 criteria,
select and size abutment protection for the bridge.Protection measures shall be included in the final
design and documented in the Hydraulic Report.
Hydraulic Report
Prepare a Hydraulic Report summarizing the findings and recommendations from the review of
existing data, site inspection, hydraulic analysis and scour analysis and abutment protection design.
Consultant's Hydraulic Report must include:
Site hydrology, flood history (if known from Project information), flood flows,velocities and water
surface elevations,and summary and output from the HEC-RAS hydraulic analysis.
A description of the impacts of the recommended bridge opening and mitigation design on
hydrology and hydraulics of the project site including design recommendations for abutment
protection.
Submit the Draft Hydraulic Report with the Predesign Report review b;the City. Respond to review
comments, and revised or amended Hydraulic Report as required.
Deliverables:
• One (1) electronic copy in PDF format of Draft Hydraulics Report to be delivered as part of
the Predesign Report as described in Task 8.1.
• One (1) electronic copy in PDF format of Final Hydraulics Report.
Task 5.2 Floodway Mitigation Predesign
Provide preliminary design of mitigation measures on site to ensure no-rise due to project impacts
within the Fanno Creek floodway. Preliminary mitigation design shall be included within the HEC
RAS hydraulic model for the project and documented within the Draft Hydraulic Report.
Deliverables:
• One (1) electronic copy in PDF format of Floodway Mitigation Predesign to be delivered as
part of the Draft Hydraulic Report as described in Task 5.1.
Task 5.3 Floodway Mitigation 90%and Final design
Provide 90% and Final design of mitigation measures on site to ensure no-rise due to project
impacts within the Fanno Creek floodway. The 90%and Final mitigation design shall be included
within the HEC RAS hydraulic model for the project and documented within the Hydraulic Report
and 90%and Final PS&E.
Deliverables:
• One (1) electronic cop;in PDF format of Floodway Mitigation 90% design to be delivered
as part of the Final Hydraulic Report as described in Task 5.1.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 25
• Engineer shall provide 90% copies of all mitigation measure plan sheets and estimate with
900/6 PS&E Package. Up to two plan sheets are assumed for this task.
• Engineer shall provide a completed comment log addressing Mitigation Predesign comments
• Engineer shall provide Final copies of all mitigation measure plan sheets and estimate. Up to
two plan sheets are assumed for this task.
• Engineer shall provide a completed comment log on 90%PS&E comments
• Quality Control documentation shall be maintained in files located at Engineer's corporate
office and be available for inspection by the City upon request.
Task 5.4 Stormwater Design
The new impervious surface created with the project are non-pollutant generating and therefore
water quality will not be required.Approved CWS LIDA approaches will be used for infiltration.
Deliverables:
• 1 plan sheet with stormwater LIDA facility details
Assumptions:
• No formal stormwater management report will be required for CWS or permitting
• Stormwater quality management will not be required
Task 6 Pathway Design
Subtask 6.1 Pathway Predesign
Investigate pathway design alternatives with regard to geometric design standards, staging issues,and
enxironmental impacts. In conjunction with structural and hydraulic design,investigate up to two
alternatives during predesign. Determine a preferred alternative based on constructability,access
control, environmental impacts and mitigation,utilities, stormwater control,and construction cost.
Prepare preliminary pathway dray Ings for the preferred alternative.The pathway drawings for the
preferred alternative shall be included in the 30°,o Plans and Estimate.The preliminary pathway
drawings shall be on 11"x17" sheets and shall include:
• Title Sheet (1 sheet)
• Typical sections (2 sheets)
• Plan and profile drawings (2 sheets)
Deliverables
• Results of the pathway alternatives analysis will be summarized in the predesign report
• One (1) 11" x 17" hard copy and one (1) electronic copy of preliminary pathway drawings to
the City.
Schedule
• Predesign shall be completed within 11 weeks following the kickoff meeting
Subtask 6.2 Prepare 90% Pathway PS&E
Engineer shall prepare and submit the following plan drawings for submittal to the City for review
as applicable.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 26
• Title Sheet (1 sheet)
• Index of sheets (1 sheet)
• Typical Sections (2 sheets)
• Detail Sheets (2 sheets)
• Plan&Profile Sheets (2 sheets)
• Erosion Control Details (2 sheets)
• Erosion Control Plans (2 sheets)
OBEC shall perform an independent design check and Quality Control/Quality Assurance
(QC/QA) review of drawings, specifications and quantities in conformance with Engineer's written
Quality Program.
Traffic control shall be handled by the contractor in compliance with ODOT Standard
Specifications and will not be designed by Engineer.
Engineer shall prepare and submit engineer's construction cost estimate of pathway construction
quantities and costs for 90%Plans.
Deliverables
• Engineer shall provide 90% copies of all pathway plan sheets and estimate with 90%PS&E
Package
• Quality Control documentation shall be maintained in files located at Engineer's corporate
office and be available for inspection by the City upon request.
• Engineer shall provide a completed comment log addressing 30%PS&E comments
Schedule
90%Design shall be completed within 8 weeks following the 30% design meeting
Subtask 6.3 Prepare Final Pathway PS&E
Engineer shall prepare and submit the Final plan drawings as described in Task 6.2 for submittal to
the City for bidding as applicable. Engineer shall perform an independent design check and Quality
Control/Quality Assurance (QC/QA) review of drawings,specifications and quantities in
conformance with Engineer's written Quality Program. Engineer shall prepare and submit engineer's
construction cost estimate of pathway construction quantities and costs for Final Plans. Engineer
shall make corrections as required following County review of 909/'0 Plans,Estimates,and
Specifications. Responses to comments shall be documented in a comment log spreadsheet.
Deliverables
• Engineer shall provide Final copies of all pathway plan sheets and estimate
• Quality Control documentation shall be maintained in files located at Engineer's corporate
office and be available for inspection by the County upon request.
• Engineer shall provide a completed comment log on 90%PS&E comments
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 27
Schedule
• Final design shall be completed within four(4)weeks of the 90% design review meeting
Task 7 Structure Design
Task shall include the alternatives analysis, final design,and production of plans,specifications and
estimates associated with the proposed structures.
Subtask 7.1 Structures Predesign
Prepare preliminary analysis and cost estimate for the proposed bridge. The analysis shall include
preliminary engineering,and feasibility and fatal flaw analysis associated with the identified bridge
alternatives.Analysis will include consideration of bridge type, foundation design,and boardwalk
structures. Prepare 30%bridge plans, and cost estimate based on the direction received following
the predesign meeting.Task shall include design,independent checking,and drafting associated with
the proposed bridge.
Assumptions
• Predesign shall assume design of a metal truss bridge.
• Predesign shall consider a timber boardwalk with a wooden rail.
• The preferred design alternative will be presented in the predesign report.
• The total number of 30% structural sheets is assumed not to exceed 6 sheets
• Design shall be in accordance with City design standards,AASHTO Design Specifications,
and the ODOT BDDNI
• Drawings shall be half-size (11"x17' produced in microstation format to Consultant
Standards
Deliverables
• Results of the Alternatives analysis shall be included in the predesign report
• 30%Design drawings will be delivered electronically(PDF) as part of 30%Plans and
Estimate design package
• Cost estimate for bridge quantities will be included with the project estimate
Schedule
• Predesign will be completed within 11 weeks of the project kickoff meeting
Subtask 7.2 Prepare 90% Structural PS&E
Prepare 901/0 structural plans, specifications and cost estimate based on the direction received
following the predesign review meeting. Task shall include design,independent checking,and
drafting associated with the proposed bridge. Engineer shall prepare complete plans,details,and
specifications for the bridge structure so that the city can procure a prefabricated bridge structure
following 90% design submittal. Bridge plans shall include general layout, structure type,and loading
criteria for the bridge superstructure. Engineer shall also provide full foundation design plans for the
bridge.
Assumptions
• Level of effort is based on the assumption that no changes to the bridge type or cross
section will be required following 30% design.
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 28
• The total number of structural sheets is assumed not to exceed 12 sheets.
• Design shall be in accordance with City design standards,AASHTO Design Specifications,
and the ODOT BDDM
• Drawings shall be half-size (11"x17") produced in microstation format to Consultant
Standards
Deliverables
• 90%Design drawings will be delivered electronically (PDF) as part of 90%PS&E design
package
• Cost estimate for structural quantities will be included with the project estimate
• 90%Bridge superstructure drawings,specifications,and cost estimates will be submitted
electronically (PDF) as a separate design submittal for use by the city in procuring a
prefabricated bridge structure.
Schedule
• 90%Design shall be completed within 8 weeks following the predesign review meeting
Subtask 7.3 Prepare Final Structural PS&E
Prepare final stamped and signed plans, specifications and cost estimate. Plans and Specifications
shall be signed by a qualified professional engineer licensed to practice in the state of Oregon. Final
deliverables shall address all outstanding review comments to the satisfaction of the city. Submit
final structural computations in a calculation book,stamped by the design engineer after submittal of
the signed construction plans.
Assumptions
• Level of effort is based on the assumption that no changes to the bridge type or cross
section will be required following 30% design meeting.
• The total number of bridge sheets is assumed not to exceed 12 sheets
Deliverables
• One hard copy of half sized (11"x17" paper) Final Stamped Structural Plans
• One scanned electronic .pdf copy of half size (11"x17") Final Stamped Structural Plans
Schedule
• Final design shall be completed within four(4)weeks of the 90% design review meeting
Task 8 Reports and Specifications
Subtask 8.1 Predesign Report
Prepare and compile a predesign report outlining the results of the preliminary analysis. The design
report will provide narrative descriptions of project concerns,and discipline specific design
considerations.The purpose of the report is to identify a preferred solution, and identify the
environmental and hydraulic impacts so that permitting tasks can be completed in parallel with final
design.
Prepare and compile an estimate of construction costs broken down in standard ODOT bid items
utilizing applicable until prices. Quantities for each item shall be calculated and independently
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 29
checked by the consultant.The cost estimate will based on the preferred design alternative.Prepare
an outline of the necessary special provisions.
Assumptions
• The results of the alternatives analysis and predesign tasks listed above will be summarized in
the predesign report
• The predesign report will be finalized following the predesign meeting
• Any design options the city wishes to be considered for the predesign report will be
identified at the conclusion of the project kickoff meeting
• Cost estimate will be completed with a target accuracy of+/-20%with a construction
contingency of 20%of the total construction costs
• Cost estimate will include all external construction costs including construction engineering
costs
Deliverables
• The predesign report will be delivered electronically in .pdf format
• Cost estimate will be completed in a Dlicrosoft excel format and delivered electronically.
Schedule
• The draft predesign report will be completed within 8 weeks of the project kickoff meeting
• A final stamped predesign report will be submitted within 2 weeks following the predesign
review meeting
Subtask 8.2 Compile 90% Specifications and Cost Estimate
Compile 900/'0 specifications and cost estimate for all technical disciplines associated with the project.
Prepare Special Provisions utilizing ODOT standard specifications and boiler plate special
provisions.Write any additional special provisions needed and prepare construction cost estimates
based on the 90% design drawings. Review the city's boiler plate general conditions and bid
documents and provide edits,as necessary.
Assumptions
• Cost estimate will be completed with a target accuracy of+/- 10%with a construction
contingency of 150/'0 of the total construction costs
• Cost estimate will include all external construction costs including construction engineering
costs
• Bridge Superstructure Specifications and Cost Estimates will be provided separately as
defined in task 7.2
• City shall provide all non-technical specifications and general conditions in.doc format for
review by the consultant
Deliverables
•
900/0 Specifications delivered electronically in .doc format
• Cost estimate delivered electronically in .xls format
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 30
Scbedule
• 90°'o Cost estimate and specifications will be completed within 8 weeks of the predesign
review meeting
Subtask 8.3 Compile Final Specifications and Cost Estimate
Compile final specifications and cost estimate for all technical disciplines associated with the project.
Prepare final stamped special provisions and cost estimate based on direction obtained at the 90%
review meeting.Address all city comments received at the 90% submittal in preparing the final
specifications and cost estimate.
Assumptions
• Cost estimate will be completed with a target accuracy of+/- 10%with a construction
contingency of 10% of the total construction costs
• Cost estimate will include all external construction costs including construction engineering
costs
• City shall be responsible for producing all non-technical specifications and general
conditions; consultant shall provide an overall review of non-technical specifications and
general conditions and will provide feedback regarding potential sources of conflict with
technical specifications.
Deliverables
• One set of review comments on non-technical specifications and general conditions
• One paper copy of the stamped final specifications and cost estimate
Schedule
• City shall provide non-technical specifications for review 4 weeks prior to Final PS&E
Submittal. Consultant shall return review comments 2 weeks prior to Final PS&E Submittal
Task 9 Quality Assurance
Provide senior level quality assurance (QA) of all major deliverables in accordance with Consultant's
Quality Management Plan(QNfP) and project specific Project Quality Plan (PQP).All major
deliverables shall be reviewed internally by the project manager,and a principal level engineer.
Assumptions
• Complete a formal internal QA process for the following deliverables:
o Predesign Report
0 90%PS&E
o Final QA
• All QA related comments shall be reviewed and verified to the satisfaction of the reviewer
Deliverables
• The QA comment logs, and PQP documentation shall be available to the cite,at any time,in
electronic format within 5 days of request.
Schedule
QA will be completed prior to submitting all deliverables listed above for city re-lew.
Task 10 Bidding Support
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 31
Provide engineering services necessary to facilitate bidding the final PS&E documents for
construction.
Subtask 10.1 Bridge Superstructure Procurement Support
Provide engineering services necessary to support the city's procurement of a bridge superstructure
that includes answering questions,identifying manufacturers,and assisting the city with evaluating
estimates and selecting a prospective bridge manufacturer. Consultant shall review bridge shop
drauwings for general compliance with bridge geometry,type, and conformance with specifications.
Assumptions
• Anticipated level of effort is limited to 30 hours of total engineering services.
• Final engineering design of bridge superstructure shall be completed and stamped by others
Deliverables
• None
Schedule
• Respond to any requests for service during the procurement process within seven (7) days of
request
Subtask 10.2 Pre-bid Services
Provide engineering services necessary to support the bidding that includes answering questions,
attending the pre-bid meeting,and assisting the city with evaluating estimates and selecting a
prospective bidder
Assumptions
• Anticipated level of effort is limited to 12 hours of total engineering services.
Deliverables
• None
Schedule
• Respond to any requests for service during the bidding process within two (2) days of
request
Subtask 10.3 Prepare Technical Addenda
Prepare technical addenda,as required,to address contractor questions and resolve documented
inconsistencies in the plans and specifications.
Assumptions
• Effort assumes up to 1 technical addenda
• Each addenda will require modifications of up to 2 plan sheets and 2 technical specifications
Deliverables
• Addenda shall be submitted,as required,to the city electronically in.pdf format
Schedule
• Addenda will be provided to city within five (5) days of request
Tiedeman Re_alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 32
Task 11 Construction Services
Consultant shall provide construction support including submittal review, RFI responses, Site
observation,and construction administration. Consultant shall prepare record drawings showing the
as constructed facilities based on contractor provided notes. Consultant shall attend a final
walkthrough of the project with City staff and contractor.
Assumptions
• Effort assumes up to 4 submittals and 4 resubmittals
• .Effort assumes up to 6 RFIs
• Construction duration shall be limited to 4 months
• Scope assumes up to 16 site visits each lasting up to two hours
• Record drawings shall be provided in .pdf and AutoCAD format
• Contractor shall be responsible for providing own construction survey and final horizontal
and vertical datum support.
• Final walkthrough shall be up to two hours with up to 2 Engineer employees
• Review contractor pay requests, quantity verification, and provide recommendations to the
City project manager—assume effort to align with scoped site visits.
• City to provide overall project management of construction
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 33
Exhibit B
Engineers Schedule of Rates
Tiedeman Re-Alignment of Fanno Freenway Trail Page 34
City of Tigard Tiedeman Realignment August S,2016
ESTIMATED COST
OBEC Consulting Engineers EXHIBIT A OBEC Joh No.P360-0017.00
Droaran M-Sw ingutxr6 FnBmxrS Enginxre En-ti mdnl Sr 11-nm•nlal Dmfhng Pnaapnl/Vrn DrvraanlEanogn P.vprd Sunoyar- Frapd TOTAL Mor,anr Ztoko, Shannon a
1 ad TASK
TASK Eneinxr8 CADDndkr4 $arv•y AahI Surxy Txh3 A-dnd/
SP-1w 1 Sp_bv. 4_11Pnssdad I TLxd P.I d Conh•Itar HOURS LA Wdaen BUDGET
N Robds•4 A He1•e A Jonas A Bu k./A E 0•rmnndsan B Whdeh-0 J Sk pfel R&buR L Ddox G.Hakonson J Wy A PM D Wrk• B.Don A Malt"
Fodna
_TAM!PROJECT MANAOEMFNT
1.1 Ovnol Proi•n Manaq•ndnt 36
-•_-•_-- 13.Prolen Mxtk:gs Z5 24
3. _ _- __-, S11,254,
Task Sk;" 61 24 0 0 -- - v-0 0 0 0 "O 0 0 0 0 0 24 107 -•---r- -----ZO.00. ;0.00 ;16,
TASK 2 SURVEI 1 i 1 i.
4.1 Horaomal nd V•rlkal Cemrol I 2 9 T 9 I 20 S',616.00
2.20 -Condruction R•cord of Su y 24 16 16 56 - ---- 35,S92TO
!.3Tapra$ra�hk Survey and Base MaPPinq - - -_ - -_I - - •• ,•• _ ._------- - - fi 32 I 38 7B I --••---••;6,404,4
Task Sukt•MI O 0 O O C 0 0 O 0 0 O a6 57 w 0 134 ;D.00r ;0.00, - COAD'•• - 18,61
TASK J ENVMONM@RAL DOCUMENTATION AND PERMITS -_W__.�_,..___._-- __.___. -•____�... �..� •__� _.W._2_ _ - -
9.1 Ravi•w Dara and OnCrotng Cammunkattan _ 4 _ ��_ 12 10 I- 26
nd __ --- .• S24BOBAO
3.2 WorlaD•11-atien and R•pan 2 -� 8 16 _I I I 90 _- $7,948,40
8.3 Clean Warr 5•rvk•s(CWS)Sit.Asseaa:eM i! 11
28 84
9A JoM PermB AppOcdran 2 SO F. 24 90 -S8,216,00
3.5 ESA Compilanot Daanaantmkn 2 32 a _ _ I 42 _ - S3,86aAO
8.6 ODFW Fid:Petaag•Plan 0 $0.00
3.7 NPDES 1200-CP•rn1 Appkation 0 _ $0.00
8.1 ProRminary SBM Reslormton Plan, B 8 53,00003 $3,656 oo 9.9 Pnparo 90%and Final SRe Realarafon Plan B __ I 8 $3,210.00 �33,866.00
3.10 Land U.and Other heal Permhs 2 20 8 8 38 53,000.0.." $6,620.00
.�_. -.---
Taskfu I2 O 0 0 0 244 Sb 76 0 ! 0 0 0 0 9 0 T66 ;9,410.
;D. ;44,68
n4 OTECIEaCALEIVFS7WAT10N 1 __ _ _ _ _
1 Dara R-1and Sit.Racomoksonca 2 i7"-- 5575.00. _ _--_ _5907.00
4.4 B•Id Explamtlon and Wborarory Tedinq 1 0 $4,790.0054,790.00
a3 Gserodmicol rmglneerinq Analysis I o $2,966.00 •-js,9ss-oa
4A Gse dtnieal EVI..rkp R•pon 2 4 - - - -- --- --- 6 _ $3,695.00 ----- _•-_--$.6 43.00
.... 4.5 ReviewdPlan and SPaeificatiom Task Srrkrold 7 4 O 0 s O 0 0 ._0. __-_O O____ �_. _.-O _. ._a .. =••O O - q R - ;O.ar 50.00' 514,685.00. ;0 14,165.00
1 f
TASKS HYDRAULIC AND STORMWATER STUDIES j e
5.1 4 - - - - - _.• 2 94
5.2 Flaodway Will tion Pmdesgn 2 20 2- _
_59,788.0
_ _ _ $2,306.00
5.3 F6odway MOigorian 90%and R-I Des1 n 4 24 I 16 i 44 $4,420.00
SA Slaaa a r AR•mwM•s Ana"and Dedgn4 20 B 32 $2,29200
r
-_53 St-.~ W nPion y __ -- 0 _ 5000
__ ._ - .,. _ - - - __ ._._ _. __ __ - ._. _ ,.----
r
_--_.- _ ..y, .. - .._, ,._
TukSahlold 0 O 16 194 ! 40 0 1 0 ,28 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 --• J - - .. -.192- $0A6 ;0.00•.. _- 0:06�_. "All $19,.
TASK 6 rA7XWAY DHiGN
at Pn6 way
al Preparo 90•h Psffirny P56E .I -- 79 -1
_....__'_ I- .I -by (•• --37.17L00
10 40 24 4 I 1 I _ 75 57,70300
a8 Prpan Fkwl Pdlnvay P58E 12 h 24 I 21 I II 61 _ $6,777_00
SuMa
Ta ___._....,_..__o.- . .. B 1 0 + 0 0 0 405 ;I -•541,211.Sokoto! 4 0 82 0 92 0 0 76 r S r --I
TASI( STRUCTURE DESIGN s
7.1 S1s+M+irer Prededgn B I 44 60 1 � , 137 � I I S16Att5.00
-
_ 7.Y Pnpan 90%Stradural P56E 2d 120 w 1 - 108 4 --�_--� _ 2i6 112600
7.7 Proparo Final Stram,ral P58E �- 12 ib -- -• _ _ •• ..�- -1 _ - - - 53 - .0
...T ik Su14,,d -• ! - -- 1 . . -m. _....0 160 0- .•, 0 0 " 194 6 .- 0 .-_. _0 .. --; -0 -i. O O 0 446 .50 . 50.00• _SO:aC: ';OJiOTASK B REPORTS AND SPECIFICATIONS6.1 Pnd•d nR• n 81 8 B 8 , 12u � ••-
g Pat3 Compile 90%SPedHoatlwss and Cod EOmor• 2 2 2 12 18 1 2 2 j 2 12 -B_ - _46 I .sTaskSbond 12 I9 14 8 O 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 JII 6i �.ao aoo.TASK! UAYTt' MNCEa 1135114 � � ,x•_ _ .- -- --. - _ - - -- - - -- I - -
0 0 0 0 o t o o r- o 0 4 66 ;oao, sD.0o7• "�-oat ;o :6,344
rASK1oNDaldGsluroeT « _ __
r
10.1 Brdge Su emrvdurc Prowromam 8 8 13 + "r�� r- � �- �• - I--- i 2 30 I - I� �- $3,988
10.1 Pre-61d S•rvlces B 4 I '__ ��- I - 12 _I 1 51,544.00
- -
103 Proparo T•dmkal Addenda _ 4 j B ! �-"I 6 � I 2 22 1_ �- -_ 52,820.
4.drwLt6w:1 so � -..� o li . .. ,. o o 0 6 -o--- - .., .o _ .,o . a.. ..4_ �.. ..S6.00s fo.6oi_ S0.�t.. � -•56�-.
TASK i I 10E .
ProlenMonagemeM
__t4 Cardrue0en Suhminoh •v 12 �_ 16 I_ � � _I 4_ 32 _6:,688.
q RFk _16 16 I I 4 -�36 55,408.00
IReeard Drawings - 8 8 2A I 40 _ •-_••.•Sti,?SEAO
_.--;Penadk Inspection;Quantity and OualRy VerB'icadan 4 _ 64 16 I 16 100 - ;I1,i80.W
Task S"041 14 36 24 , 16 M .a -0 24 -i0 - -0 •0 0 32 214 -; 400. •$0.OD. _.$0.00',., ,.$0. $26,968.010
176 ,--�' l6--_. .='9�--'--1 176 ___-�• 242 _-,66•-... _�.--461 _- I 9 .� -_12_ ,-'� ..___- . _NA.
AVERAGENOURLYRATL3 $166.00 $154.00 $133.00 $102.00 $102.00 $8200 $116001 $90.001 $133.00 $245.00 $166.001 $133.00 560.00 $90.00 $102.00 _
_ ._ .. _--___.___._ �-
TOTAL LABOR ESTIMATE $2274200 $27,104-00 $11,438.00 $72p40.00 $17,952.00 $19,844.00 $6,49 00
(36,360.00 $1,197AD $2,940.00 54,648,48 $4,522.00 $3,420.00 55,670.00 f9,792.00 $9,210.00 $OAO Si2,8B5.00 50.00 5228,660.
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES= $140.ar
TOTAL OBEC PROJECT ESTIMATE= ;229,000,ar
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS= 229,000 00
EXPENSES
Company and Expxse Dartgn Condndion
M6aag•(2009575 p•r mg.) $115.00
MkoaOanxn Expxns 525
Totals= $0 $140.00
OBEC Bahia of Coat
Last Printed:9/28.2016--11:24 AM Page 1 of 1 OBEC final COST TIEDEM:,N
BddgeySfrurxwea.Roedway/Cly➢.Speciecall Renn."ing d Utilities
Survey/Georml ice Conahruction Engineering Management
' � fYA'S"111A6
� !AvlY1fYS
2016 Salary Grade#Hourly Rates
Personnel Classification Personnel Classification
Principal/President $255 Princlpal,rViea President $245
Deshon Construction
Division Manager 3 $215 Division Manager 3 $215 Principal/PresWent
_ $255
Division Manager 2 $198 Division Manager 2 $198 PrinclpaINlce President _ $245
Project Manager 3 $198 Construction Project Manager 3 $198 Division Manager_3
Engineer $198 Division Manager $166 DNklonManager 2 $198
Division Manager l $166 Construction Project Manager 2 $166 Project Manager _
$198
Project Manager 2 $166 Construction Project Manager l $154 Engineer _ _
Engineer 7 $166 Assitant Project Manager 1 _$196
j g $133 Division Manager 1 $166
Project Managed $154 Construction Engineer 5 $154 Project Manager
Engineer 6 $154 Construction Engineer 4 $133 Engineer? $166
Utility Coordinator 3 $133 Construction Engineer 3 $116 Project Manager 1 $154
Transportation Planner $133 Construction Engineer 2 $102 Engineer __$154
Engineer 5 $133 Engineering Tech 4 $116 ugllty Coordinator 3 $133
Designer 4 $116 Engineering Tech 3 $90 Transportation Planner _ $133
Engineer 4 $116 Engineering Tech 2 $72 Engineer $133
Sr.Environmental Specialist $116 Engineering Tech 1 $66 Designer $116
Utility Coordinator $116 CECOP $60Errgineer4 _
_ $116
Utility Coordinator 1 $102 Sr.Environmental Specialist $116
Designer $102 Administration Utility Coordinator 2 _$116
Engineer 3 $102 IT Manager/HR Manager/Marketing Manager $166 Utility Coordinator 1 $102
Environmental Specialist 3 $102 Proposal Manager $116 D_esigner3 _ $102
Designer $90 Contract Administrator $116 Engineer $102
Engineer $90 Database Controller $102 Environmental Specialist $_102
Environmental Specialist 2 $90 Sr.Proposal Coordinator $102 Designer $90
Designer 1 $82 Project Accountant/Project Controller $102 .Engineer2 $90
Engineer 1 $82 Proposal Coordinator/Sr.Graphic Artist $90IEnvlronr a tal Specialist _ __ $g0
Environmental Specialist 1 $82 Network Administrator 1 $90 (Designer 1 $82
Drafting Supervisor $133 Administrative Assistant 4/Sr.Billing Clerk $82 1 Engineer 1 $82
Sr.CAD Drafter $102 Marketing Coordinator 1/Graphic Artists $82 _Drafting gupervlsor_ _ $133
CAD Drafter 4 $90 Administrative Assistant 3 'Sr.Accounting Clerk $72 Sr.CAD Drafter _ _ _ $102
CAD Drafter 3 $82 Administrative Assistant 2/Accounting Clerk 2 $66 CAD Drafter 3 __ $82
CAD Drafter 2 $72 HS Interns/File Clerks $40 CAD Drafter 2
$72
CAD Drafter 1 $60 CAD Drager 1 $60
jDivubn Maneger l __$166
rve 1
Y�---X-.fl Project Surveyor-Teem Lead $1�
Division Manager 1 $166 Project Surveyor __ _ $116
Project Surveyor-Team Lead $133 (Survey Tech 3 - __ _ $90
Project Surveyor $116 Survey Tech _ _ _ $72
Survey Tech 3 $90 yDMsbn Manager $215
Survey Tech $72 (Division Manager 2
Survey Tech 1 $60 ,Construction Project Manager 2 $166
rConstruction Project Manager 1
rAsitant Project Manager 1 I $133
Construction Engil_ __— �_ $1541
Construction Engineer 4
Construction Engineer 3 i $1161
Construction Engineer 2 _ 1 _ $1021
Engt,mill rg Tech 4 _ 7 $11611
Engineering Tech 3 ' $gpl
'Engineering Tech 2 ��_ 1 $72;
'Engneerinq Tech 1 $661
CECOP_ _ _ _ $60�
IT Manaol Managsrli arketinp Manager 1_ $166
Proposal Manager _t $116
'Contract Administrator _ _ $1161
Database_Controller _ $102:
Sr.Proposal Coordinator _ _ $1021
Protect Accountant l Project Controller - $1021
:ProposalCoordinatoriSr-Graphic Artist I _$901
,Network Administrator l _ T $g0�
Administrative Assistant4�Sr.Billing Clerk_ $62
Marketing Coordinator 1 lxr lric Art'ets _ Ii+-- $8_21
Administrative Assistant3/Sr.Accounting Clerk I `$721
IAdministrative Aaeistant2/_Accounting Clerk 2 _L _$6�61
H8 Interns:File Clerks _$401
CAD Drafter 4 $90
'Survey Tech - $60
Travel/Reimbursable Expenses: EnNronmental Specialist 1 $82
Mileage: ODOT Current Rate Equipment Charges: �—
Reimbursable job costs will be invoiced at cast. Special equipment @ direct rental cost L