The URL can be used to link to this page

CCDA Packet - 06/07/2016 City of Tigard City Center Development Agency Board CCDAand Tigard City Council - Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Revised 6/7/2016:Agenda Items have been reordered. MEETING DATE AND TIME: June 7,2016 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for City Center Development Agency Board meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the City Center Development Agency Board meeting. Please call 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deao. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deao. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA " City of Tigard City Center Development pment Agency Board CCDAand Tigard City Council - Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING Revised 6/7/2016:Agenda Items have been reordered. MEETING DATE AND TIME: June 7, 2016 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Call to Order- City Center Development Agency& City Council B. Roll Call C. Call to Board and Staff for Non-Agenda Items •EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss exempt public records litigation,under ORS 192.660(2) (0. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 6:35 p.m. estimated time CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2. APPOINT CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS 7:05 p.m. estimated time 3. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSS SW CORRIDOR BALLOT MEASURE 7:10 p.m. estimated time 4. RECEIVE BROWNFIELD INITIATIVE UPDATE 8:10 p.m. estimated time 5. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING: FISCAL YEAR 2016 CCDA FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET HEARING 8:25 p.m. estimated time CITY COUNCIL 6. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER RECREATION PROGRAM FEE ORDINANCE 8:35 p.m. estimated time LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD 7. BRIEFING ON PROCESS FOR CIVIC CENTER CONTRACT 8:55 p.m. estimated time 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS •EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss pending litigation or litigation likely to be filed, and property negotiations,under ORS 192.660(2) (h) and (e).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:10 p.m. estimated time 9. ADJOURNMENT 9:40 p.m. estimated time AIS-2709 2. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 06/07/2016 Length (in minutes):60 Minutes Agenda Title: INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSS SW CORRIDOR BALLOT MEASURE Submitted By: Sean Farrelly,Community Development Item Type: Public Hearing- Informational Meeting Type: City Center Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Discuss compliance with Section 53 of the City of Tigard Charter related to the Southwest Corridor High Capacity Transit project and a proposed November 2016 ballot measure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Board of the CCDA is requested to share their opinions and ideas on complying with section 53 of the Tigard Charter and SW Corridor planning,including the value of having light rail directly serve Downtown Tigard. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard Charter Section 53 states that the City of Tigard,as a matter of public policy,opposes construction of a new high capacity transit corridor within the city boundary unless voter approval is first obtained. The Southwest Corridor High Capacity Transit project is proceeding under regional direction to plan for a light rail line that would directly interconnect Tualatin,downtown Tigard,and Portland. The project will improve mobility in the corridor for thousands of regional employees and residents,and will lay the groundwork for communities in the corridor to achieve their land use visions. In Tigard,planning aspirations for the Downtown and Triangle districts are especially related to the future of high capacity transit. A light rail transit project in the Southwest Corridor is needed to address the following issues: •Transit service to places where people need or want to go is limited,and demand for transit is increasing due to growth. •Limited street connectivity and gaps in pedestrian and bicycle networks create barriers and unsafe conditions for transit access and active transportation. •Travel is slow and is not reliable on congested roadways. •There is a limited supply and range of housing options with good access to multimodal transportation networks. •The road and transit network needs to maximize the ability of future development to meet local and regional goals The corridor is rich in natural resources that need to be protected or enhanced. •Areas of the corridor lack access to parks, trails,and natural areas. All of the light rail alignments under consideration include a Downtown Tigard station.Two of the alignments feature direct service to Tualatin and Portland and one would have"branch" service (every other train serving downtown Tigard).A light rail station presents a significant revitalization opportunity that will build on the public and private investments in downtown.The presence of high quality, frequent transit service will attract new mixed-use and residential development,the type of development that was envisioned in the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. New residents will invigorate the potential customer base for downtown businesses. To comply with Section 53 of the City Charter, the City Attorney has prepared two ordinances and a draft ballot title. The ordinances are written to follow the legislative direction provided by Section 53. The draft ballot title is offered for CCDA discussion. OTHER ALTERNATIVES This is an informational presentation only. No action is being requested,but CCDA discussion is desired. CCAC members are expected to be on hand to share views on the Southwest Corridor project as it relates to downtown growth and development. Staff intends to brief the City Council on the same matter on June 28. Staff recommends council act on the ordinances and ballot title on June 28,assuming the CCDA discussion does not raise any significant issues with the draft documents. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard Strategic Plan: Vision "To be the most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest where people of all ages and abilities enjoy health and interconnected lives." Goal 1• "Facilitate walking connections to develop an identity." Objective 2. "The trail system is used for all kinds of trips." - "The walking/transit connection is creatively engaged." - "The transit waiting experience is improved." - "Sidewalks are part of the plan,especially in relation to connections to transit stops." Goal 2• "Ensure development advances the vision." Tigard City Council Goals and Milestones 2015-17 Goal 2• "Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be" Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan: Goal 3. "Downtown's transportation system should be multi-modal,connecting people, places and activities safely and conveniently." Goal 5. "Promote high quality development of retail,office and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape, transportation, recreation,and open space investments." Tigard Comprehensive Plan: Special Planning Areas: Downtown Goal 15.1. "The City will promote the creation of a vibrant and active urban village at the heart of the community that is pedestrian oriented,accessible by many modes of transportation,recognizes natural resources as an asset,and features a combination of uses that enable people to live,work, play,and shop in an environment that is uniquely Tigard." Goal 15.4. "Develop comprehensive street and circulation improvements for pedestrians,automobiles, bicycles,and transit." Policy 1. "The downtown shall be served by a complete array of multi-modal transportation services including auto, transit,bike,and pedestrian facilities." Policy 2. "The downtown shall be Tigard's primary transit center for rail and bus transit service and supporting land uses." Economic Development Goal 9.1. "Develop and maintain a strong, diversified, and sustainable local economy." Policy 10: "The City shall strongly support,as essential to the region's economic future, the development of efficient regional multi-modal transportation systems throughout the Portland Metropolitan area." Housing Goal 10.1. "Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents." Policy 5. "The City shall provide for high and medium density housing in the areas such as town centers (Downtown),regional centers (Washington Square),and along transit corridors where employment opportunities, commercial services, transit,and other public services necessary to support higher population densities are either present or planned for in the future." Transportation Goal 12.1. "Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livability of the community." Policy 3. "The City shall maintain and enhance transportation functionality by emphasizing multi-modal travel options for all types of land uses." Policy 4. "The City shall promote land uses and transportation investments that promote balanced transportation options." Policy 5. "The City shall develop plans for major transportation corridors and provide appropriate land uses in and adjacent to those corridors." Tigard Transportation System Plan: Goal 3. Multi-modal Transportation System "Provide an accessible,multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community." Policy 2. "The city shall engage with regional partners to support development of high capacity transit serving the Tigard area." Tigard High Capacity Transit Land Use Plan: Serves as a tool for implementing Tigard's vision for HCT stations DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION September 1, 2015: Southwest Corridor/Downtown Zoom-in July 21, 2015 : Presentation of Southwest Corridor Planning Progress Resolution No. 15-05 on February 10,2015,authorizing an IGA to fund ongoing planning and public involvement activities related to the Southwest Corridor Plan. Resolution No. 14-11 on February 11,2014,opposing ballot measure 34-210,a measure to adopt Tigard policy opposing new HCT projects. Resolution No. 13-43 on October 8,2013, endorsing the Southwest Corridor Plan and shared investment strategy. Resolution No. 13-42 on September 24,2013, submitting to the voters a proposed charter amendment to be considered at the March 11,2014 special election. Resolution No. 12-33 on August 21,2012, submitting to the voters a proposed charter amendment which would require a public vote prior to imposing new local taxes or fees to fund light rail construction. Attachments Procedural Ordinance Authorization Ordinance Ballot Title Enacting Ordinance Procedural Ordinance Ordinance establishing clarifying definitions and procedures for determining if the proposed authorizing ordinance complies with the Charter. Page 1 — Ordinance No. 16- 50014-74648 Ordinance no Procedural Ordiiumce re clarifying Charier definitions mid procedures(1).DOCX ORFS 31,2016 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.16- AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PROCEDURE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TIGARD CITY CHARTER SECTION 53C. RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARY. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard City Council has authority to adopt definitions for terms left undefined or otherwise ambiguous in the Tigard City Charter;and WHEREAS, Tigard City Council has authority and responsibility to implement provisions of the Tigard City Charter;and WHEREAS, Tigard City Charter Section 53 contains ambiguous or undefined terms and lacks procedures for implementation of some of its requirements;and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council intends to adopt definitions and procedures for the purpose of implementing Tigard City Charter Section 53;and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a public process to determine if an authorization ordinance proposed under Charter Section 53 complies with the requirements of the Charter. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. An Ordinance of the City of Tigard is hereby created as follows: Charter Section 53 Implementation Ordinance SECTION A. Purpose. Definitions are created and a procedure is imposed for the purpose of interpretation and implementation of Tigard City Charter Section 53 relating to the construction of a new high-capacity transit corridor project within the City boundary. The purpose of the implementation procedure is to assure that any authorization ordinance referred to the voters under Charter Section 53 is in conformance with the requirements of that Section. The purpose of the definitions is to clarify any ambiguities that may exist regarding the words and phrases within Tigard City Charter Section 53. SECTION B. Definitions. As used in Tigard City Charter Section 53,the following definitions shall apply: 1. "Accurately summarizes the information required"means that the ballot title approved by the City Council shall: a. Contain a link to a website where Charter required information is available. b. Provide the maximum total amount of road capacity that would be reduced by the new high-capacity transit corridor,as that phrase is defined in Section 9 of this Ordinance. Page 1 —Ordinance No. 16- 50014_74648 ordinance no_ Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charter definitions and procedures(2).DOCXIDRF1513112016 C. Describe in general terms the subjects of the changes to land use regulations that will be proposed to site or otherwise accommodate the new high-capacity transit corridor. d. Provide projected public cost of the entire high-capacity transit corridor project based upon information from the government responsible for constructing the project. 2. "Authorization Ordinance"means the authorization ordinance described in Section 53 of the City of Tigard Charter. 3. "Changes to land use regulations within the City that will be proposed to site or otherwise accommodate the new high-capacity transit corridor"means to describe the specific uses of land that will require amendments to the City comprehensive plan,zoning map,or development code in order to be lawfully allowed under applicable City standards. 4. "Increases in housing density"means changes to zoning maps,comprehensive plan maps, zoning district text or comprehensive plan text,which have the effect of authorizing a greater number of housing units than were permitted previously. 5. "New high-capacity transit corridor project"means the proposal to extend light rail transit service from Portland toBridgeport,including to downtown Tigard. 6. "Projected public cost of the entire high-capacity transit corridor project"means the cost estimate for the Southwest Corridor Light Rail project,as estimated by TriMet,at the time of City Council adoption of the Authorization Ordinance. 7. "Public rights of way that could otherwise provide additional road capacity at a future date" means any public right of way within five miles of the Tigard city boundary line which does not permit motor vehicle traffic at the time the Authorization Ordinance is approved by the Tigard City Council,but could lawfully provide additional road capacity for motor vehicle traffic at a future date and which is influenced by an alignment option. This does not include required sidewalks,bike paths,or other non-automobile facilities. 8. "Roadway within five miles of the City that currently permits public motor vehicle traffic" means any public right of way within five miles of the City boundary line which permits motor vehicle traffic at the time the Authorization Ordinance is approved by the Tigard City Council and which is influenced by an alignment option. 9. "Total amount of road capacity that would be reduced by the new high-capacity transit corridor"means: a. For roadways that currently permits public motor vehicle traffic: the net percentage change in vehicles per hour from vehicles per hour at the time the authorization ordinance is adopted,on roadways identified in each alignment option, to vehicles per hour should the given alignment option be constructed. The net change shall take into account any reductions and gains in the number of vehicles per hour;or b. For public rights of way that could otherwise provide additional road capacity at a future date:The net percentage change in acreage of public right of way that,at the time of adoption of the authorization ordinance,could provide additional road capacity at a future date,after construction of the high-capacity transit corridor, for each alignment option. SECTION C. General Provisions. Page 2—Ordinance No. 16- 50014-746480rdinance no Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charier definitions and procedures(2).DOCXiDRF/5/31/1016 1. The information required by Section 53 of the City's Charter to meet the requirements for the Authorization Ordinance and the ballot title shall be based on information available and presented to the City Council on the date of its decisions on the Authorization Ordinance and the ballot tide. All roadway capacity information required for the Authorization Ordinance shall be provided for all alignment options. 2. All roadway capacity information required for the Authorization Ordinance and ballot measure shall be based on the methodology of Section D. of this ordinance as determined by a qualified traffic engineer and contained in a written report of the results of application of Section D. SECTION D. Methodology to determine roadway capacity impacts. The roadway capacity determinations required by this Ordinance and Tigard City Charter Section 53 shall be based on the methodology described in Appendix A (Roadway Capacity Methodology,May_,2016) which is attached and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION E. Authorization Ordinance Approval Procedure. Before referring an authorization ordinance to the voters, the City Council shall determine whether the proposed ordinance satisfies the requirements of Tigard City Charter Section 53 and the definitions of this ordinance. The decision to refer may be made at a regular or special meeting of the City of Tigard City Council and the public will be permitted the opportunity to present written or oral testimony on the proposed ordinance. SECTION 2. The sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses of this ordinance are severable. The invalidity of one section, subsection,paragraph,or clause shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections,subsections,paragraphs and clauses. SECTION 3. The City Council finds that the immediate availability of the procedure provided in this Ordinance is necessary to assure that the Authorization Ordinance required by Charter Section 53C.can be considered by voters in November,2016. SECTION 4. For the reasons set forth in Section 3,an emergency is declared to exist and this Ordinance takes effect upon adoption by the City Council and signature of the Mayor. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of 92016. Carol A.Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2016. John L.Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Page 3 —Ordinance No. 16— 500/4-746480rdimnceno_ Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charter definitions and procedures(2).DOCXIDRF/5/31/1016 Page 4—Ordinance No. 16- 50014-74648Ordinanceno Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charier definitions and procedures(2).DOCXIDRF/513112016 APPENDIX A CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO SECTION 53 OF TIGARD CHARTER 5-31-16 APPENDIX A—ROADWAY CAPACITY METHODOLOGY,MAY 31,2016 1. Purpose The provisions in this Code Section shall be used to comply with the requirement for an Authorization Ordinance set forth in Subsection C of Section 53 of the City of Tigard Charter to include an estimate of the impact of a Light Rail Transit on the vehicular capacity of roadways and unused public rights-of-way within five miles of the City. 2. Definitions: A. Added Motor Vehicle Capacity means the additional amount of Motor Vehicle Capacity for a Segment of a Planned Roadway that results from a Planned Roadway incorporated in an Alignment Option. B. Alignment Option means a light rail alignment option, including any ancillary facilities included in the conceptual design for such alignment option, approved for further analysis by the Southwest Corridor Project Steering Committee at the time the Authorization Ordinance is submitted to the voters. C. Motor Vehicle Capacity means: a. Motor Vehicle Capacity on a signalized roadway is defined as the maximum number of motor vehicles that can pass through a Critical Intersection. b. For Unused Public ROW: the reasonably estimated potential area of future roadway area, excluding surface area dedicated to bicycle and pedestrian and other facilities such as water quality treatment,and buildable on Unused Public ROW. c. The Motor Vehicle Capacity of Existing or Added Roadways and of Unused Public ROW is separate and distinct amounts and,as such,are not addable. D. Critical Direction means the direction of the roadway that most limits the Auto Capacity at a specific Critical Intersection in the Peak Hour. E. Critical Intersection means an intersection or other specific capacity-limiting feature (e.g.; lane reduction) on an Existing Roadway that has a Volume-to-Capacity Ratio of greater than 0,90 that limits the through automobile capacity of the Existing Roadway at such intersection,as identified by a Traffic Engineering using Standard Practices F. Existing Roadway means any roadway within five miles of the City that permits public automobile traffic at the time of the Authorization Ordinance is submitted to the voters that are influenced by an Alignment Option. These are roadways defined in Metro's Mobility Corridor#2 (Portland-Tigard-Tualatin), which includes the following four auto routes: 99W/Barbur, I-5, Boone's Ferry/Macadam Avenue, and Terwilliger/Capitol Highway/Bridgeport Village and are shown in appendix A-1. 1 ) Appendix A, Page 1 of 5 50014-74648 Ordinance no Procedural Ordinmtce re clarifying Charier definitions and procedures(2).DOCAIDHF/5/31/20/6 CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO SECTION 53 OF TIGARD CHARTER 5-31-16 G. Lane Mile means the number of lanes times the length of the lanes expressed in miles. H. Metro Transportation Model means the suite of transportation computer models operated by Metro to forecast regional travel and to prepare the Regional Transportation Plan, including without limitations the digitized road network showing the general capacity of highway links,and the traffic volume forecast for the year 2035. I. Net Motor Vehicle Capacity Reduction means for a subject Alignment Option the net change in motor Vehicle capacity of roadways resulting from the Alignment Option, taking into account any capacity reductions and capacity gains associated with the Alignment Option. J. Peak-Hour means the 60 minute period that has the highest volume of traffic at an intersection. The term AM peak hour is the 60 minute period in the morning with the highest traffic volume and the PM peak hour is the 60 minute period in the afternoon with the highest traffic volume. K. Percentage Reduction in Corridor Motor Vehicle Capacity means the fraction estimated as the Net Motor Vehicle Capacity Reduction for the Alignment Option divided by the Total Corridor Motor Vehicle Capacity. L. Light Rail Transit Corridor means Metro's Mobility Corridor #2 (Portland-Tigard- Tualatin), which includes the following four auto routes: 99W/Barbur, 1-5, Boone's Ferry/Macadam Avenue, and Terwilliger/Capitol Highway/Bridgeport Village. The capacity of the Corridor was estimated using a combination of the Regional Land Information System(RLIS),and the Metro Transportation Model. M. Reduced Motor Vehicle Capacity means for a Critical Intersection the amount that the Motor Vehicle Capacity of the Critical Intersection is reduced when an Alignment Option is introduced,and for an Existing Roadway means the maximum Reduced Motor Vehicle Capacity among all the Critical Intersections for such Existing Roadway that were analyzed by the Traffic Engineer, N. Reduced Future Motor Vehicle Capacity of Unused Public ROW shall be the area of Unused Public ROW that could reasonably be used for a future roadway, excluding any required sidewalks or a bicycle facility that is otherwise used for an Alignment Option. 0. Roadway Conversion Map means one or more maps reasonably portraying each Alignment Option the general location and vehicular lanes on Existing Roadways that would no longer be available or added for general public traffic if such Alignment Option was constructed. P. Standard Practices means the use of assumptions, data,and methodologies to estimate the factors described in this Section, taking into account the definitions and provisions described in this Section and the conceptual designs and available information at the time the Authorization Ordinance is submitted to the voters, as reasonably determined by a Traffic Engineer. Revisions to the Alignment Options or other data or assumptions subsequent to voter approval of an Authorization Ordinance shall not nullify the 2 � r Appendix A, Page 2 of 5 50014-74648 Ordinance no_Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charter definitions and procedures(2).D0CXiDRF/5/31/2016 CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO SECTION 53 OF TIGARD CHARTER 5-31-16 reasonableness of the Standard Practices or the conclusions in the Traffic Engineer's Report prepared for the Authorization Ordinance. Q. Total Corridor Motor Vehicle Capacity means the aggregate total Motor Vehicle Capacity of the routes comprising the Corridor as defined by Metro's Mobility Corridor fit (Portland-Tigard-Tualatin), which includes the following four auto routes: 99W/Barbur, 1-5, Boones Ferry/Macadam Avenue, and Terwilliger/Capitol Highway/Bridgeport Village. R. Traffic Engineer means a Professional Engineer licensed in Oregon and specializing in traffic engineering. S. Traffic Engineer Report means a report signed and sealed by a Traffic Engineer in conformance with this Section. The estimates in the Report shall be based on Standard Practices. Any revisions subsequent to an approval of an Authorization Ordinance to alignments, designs, data, assumptions, or any other information used to prepare the Report following approval of an Authorization Ordinance shall not invalidate the approval of the Authorization Ordinance. The Report shall be posted on a website prepared or caused to be prepared by the City of Tigard. T. Unused Public ROW Map means one or more maps reasonably portraying for each Alignment Option the general location and extent of ROW that potentially could be used to add Motor Vehicle Capacity that adds system capacity that may be influenced by the Alignment Option, 3. General Provisions A. The factors described in this Code Section shall be based on information available at the time the Authorization Ordinance is submitted to the voters, and shall be estimated for all Alignment Options. B. If approved,the Authorization Ordinance shall not be invalidated by any future changes to the Alignment Options,data,assumptions or other pertinent information. 4. Traffic Engineer's Report A. No later than 90 days prior to an election date for an Authorization Ordinance, a Traffic Engineer's Report shall be prepared by a Traffic Engineer documenting the following for each Alignment Option: a. A Roadway Conversion Map based on the conceptual design for Alignment Option at the time the Authorization Ordinance is submitted to the voters. The Conversion Map shall portray for Existing Roadways the general location and extent of vehicular through lanes and vehicular turn lanes that are converted or added for use by Light Rail Transit. b. An Unused Public ROW Map, based on the conceptual design for Alignment Option at the time the Authorization Ordinance is submitted to the voters, portraying the general location and extent of Unused Public ROW used for Light Rail Transit that 3 ) Appendix A, Page 3 of 5 50014-74648 Ordinance no_Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charter definitions and procedures(1).DOCXIDRF/5/3111016 CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO SECTION 53 OF TIGARD CHARTER 5-31-16 otherwise potentially could provide additional Motor Vehicle Capacity at a future date. c. For each Existing Roadway having its Motor Vehicle Capacity reduced by the Alignment Option the following will be estimated: i. Motor Vehicle Capacity at each Critical Intersection without the Alignment Option; ii. Motor Vehicle Capacity at each Critical Intersection with the Alignment Option; d. The following will be estimated: i. Net Motor Vehicle Capacity Reduction; ii. Percentage Reduction in Total Corridor Motor Vehicle Capacity; iii. Reduced Future lane miles that would result in added Motor Vehicle Capacity using Unused Public ROW; B. In preparing the Traffic Engineer's Report, the Traffic Engineer shall employ the methodologies described herein and shall use Standard Practices for identifying other assumptions, data, and methodologies as the Traffic Engineer reasonably determines are necessary or desirable for the required analyses. C. The Traffic Engineer's Report shall be signed and sealed by a Traffic Engineer. D. The Traffic Engineer's Report shall be posted on a website hosted by the City of Tigard. S. Methodology to Estimate Motor Vehicle Capacity Impacts A. For each Alignment Option, the Traffic Engineer shall estimate the Motor Vehicle Capacity and Reduced Motor Vehicle Capacity of an Existing Roadway as follows: a. The Traffic Engineer shall identify Critical Intersections in the Corridor that have a potential for capacity to be reduced by Light Rail Transit. b. The Motor Vehicle Capacity of a Critical Intersection shall be estimated in the Critical Direction during the Peak Hour on an average weekday under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions; as reasonably estimated by a Traffic Engineer using Standard Practice, c. For each Critical Intersection, the Traffic Engineer shall reasonably estimate the Motor Vehicle Capacity under No-Build condition (i.e.; without the Alignment Option) and under Build conditions (i.e.; with the Alignment Option), Motor Vehicle Capacity estimated for the future Build (with the Alignment Option) shall take into consideration the capacity made available for auto travel by the removal of on- street buses in favor of the Light Rail Transit Vehicles that would operate on separated rights-of-way with the Alignment Option. 4 Appendix A, Page 4 of 5 50014-74648 Ordinance no_Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charter definitions and procedures(2).DOCXIDRF15/3//10/6 CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO SECTION 53 OF TIGARD CHARTER 5-31-16 d. The Reduced Motor Vehicle Capacity of a Critical Intersection shall be estimated as the difference between the Motor Vehicle Capacity of the critical movement at the Critical Intersection without the Alignment Option and the Motor Vehicle Capacity of the critical movement at the Critical Intersection with the Alignment Option. e. The Reduced Motor Vehicle Capacity of an Existing Roadway shall be estimated as the range of Reduced Motor Vehicle Capacity at the Critical Intersections for such Existing Roadway analyzed by the Traffic Engineer. These are not additive. B. The Traffic Engineer shall estimate the Percentage Reduction in Roadway Capacity for each Alignment Option as follows: a. The Traffic Engineer shall estimate Total Corridor Motor Vehicle Capacity as follows:The distinct parallel continuous roadway routes within Metro's Mobility Corridor #2 will be identified and their capacity will be estimated using the Metro Transportation Model. For routes where more specific traffic analysis is available, this information will be used. The Total Capacity will be the sum of the motor vehicle capacities of the Corridor roadway routes in Exhibit A-1. b. The Traffic Engineer shall estimate Percentage Reduction in Corridor Motor Vehicle Capacity as the fraction resulting from dividing the Net Motor Vehicle Capacity Reduction for the Alignment Option by the Total Motor Vehicle Corridor Capacity. 6. Methodology to Estimate Unused Public ROW Impacts A. Unused Public ROW Conversion Map shall be provided by the Traffic Engineer. The map and data shall also show the general location and extent of Unused Public ROW that could be used for additional Motor Vehicle Capacity, based on the conceptual designs and available information at the time the Authorization Ordinance is submitted to the voters. B. For each Alignment Option, the Traffic Engineer, using reasonable professional judgment in the absence of any available roadway plans or designs for such Unused Public ROW, shall identify the Unused Public ROW that potentially can be used for future Motor Vehicle Capacity improvement given any upstream or downstream capacity constraints, environmental concerns, or unreasonable financial constraints that may be physically or functionally related to the Unused Public ROW. C. In addition,the Traffic Engineer shall create a table describing the potential lane miles of Unused Public ROW excluding any sidewalks, bicycle or other code related facilities that is otherwise used by an Alignment Option. The table shall report the percent change in lane miles of Unused Public ROW, compared to the existing Metro Mobility#2 Corridor lane miles, Unused Public ROW that is identified to not be reasonably utilizable for a future roadway by a Traffic Engineer, using Standard Practices, shall be deemed to have no future motor vehicle capacity. 5Page Appendix A, Page 5 of 5 5001!-74648 Ordinance no_Procedural Ordinance re clarifying Charter definitions and procedures(1).DOCXIDRF15/31/1016 Authorization Ordinance This ordinance allows support for light rail transit service along the SW Corridor,including downtown Tigard,expressly authorizes changes to land use regulations to accommodate siting and includes the information required by the City's Charter. Page 1 —Ordinance No. 16- 50014-74648 Ordiruntce no 16- Authorization Ordinance re supportfor light rail transtt service to downtown.DOCXiDRF/5/3//1016 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN AUHORZATION ORDINANCE TO ALLOW SUPPORT FOR SITING OF A NEW HIGH- CAPACITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR FOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SERVICE WHICH INCLUDES DOWNTOWN TIGARD, RELATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND USE REGULATIONS, PROVIDING REQUIRED INFORMATION AND OTHER ACTIONS. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard City Charter, Section 53A.requires the City to oppose the construction of a new high-capacity transit corridor within the City boundary unless voter approval is first obtained; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard City Charter Section 53C. provides that the City may not amend its comprehensive plan or land use regulations to accommodate the siting of a new high-capacity transit corridor project, if the project has not first received voter approval at an election on an authorization ordinance;and WHEREAS,a new high-capacity light rail transit service corridor is being considered by the region;and WHEREAS, changes to land use regulations will be proposed to site and otherwise accommodate the new high-capacity transit corridor project to extend light rail service from Portland to Bridgeport, including to downtown Tigard;and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council desires to refer the authorization ordinance required under Charter Section 53C. to the voters of the City of Tigard for voter approval on November 8, 2016. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: A City of Tigard ordinance is hereby created as provided as follows: NEW HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR AUTHORIZATION ORDINANCE SECTION A. City of Tigard support for a new high-capacity transit corridor in the City of Tigard boundary is allowed. SECTION B. The City of Tigard is authorized to make changes to the comprehensive plan and land use regulations to allow light rail to cross wetlands with proper mitigation, site a light rail maintenance facility in all industrial zones, and add housing density. SECTION C. The following describes aspects of the new high-capacity transit corridor project, which would extend light rail service from Portland to Bridgeport, including downtown Tigard ("Project") as required by City of Tigard City Charter, Section 53C.: Page 2—Ordinance No. 16— 50014-74648Ordhumce no 16- Authorization OrAtnance re support for light rail transit service to downtown.DOCXIDRF/5/3112016 1. Road Capacity: The total change in road capacity as a result of the new high-capacity transit corridor as described in the attached Appendix A ("Roadway Capacity Reduction Analysis, May 31, 2016) and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Housing Density: Related to the Project, housing density will be increased within the Tigard downtown area. 3. Land Use Regulations and Comprehensive Plan: Changes are proposed to land use regulations or the comprehensive plan to site or otherwise accommodate the Project. Those changes include provisions to allow light rail to cross wetlands with proper mitigation, siting of a maintenance facility in any industrial zone, and increases in housing density in the Tigard downtown area. 4. Projected Public Cost: the current projected public cost of the entire Project is $2.0-2.4 billion. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Tigard finds that this Authorization Ordinance satisfies the requirements of Tigard City Charter Section 53 and Ordinance SECTION 3: The sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses of this ordinance are severable. The invalidity of one section, subsection,paragraph or clause shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective upon certification by the County Elections official that it has received voter approval at a referendum election conducted on November 8,2016. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of ,2016. Carol A.Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 52016. John Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Page 3 —Ordinance No. 16— 50014-74648 Ordinance no 16-_Authorization Ordinance re support for light rail transit service to downtown.DOCXIDRF1513112016 APPENDIX A Roadway Capacity Reduction Analysis May 31, 2016 ME MEMORANDUM 720 SW Washington St. Suite 500 Portland,OR 97205 DATE: May 31, 2016 503.243.3500 www.dksassociates.corn TO: City of Tigard FROM: Peter L.Coffey,PE SUBJECT: Southwest Corridor Motor Vehicle Capacity Reduction Analysis Pp15038-003 This memorandum presents the results of a traffic analysis regarding the potential reduction in motor vehicle capacity with the Southwest Corridor Plan and its associated Light Rail transit project in southwest Portland that extends into Tigard and Tualatin.This memorandum addresses the motor vehicle capacity methodology adopted by Tigard Ordinance and its associated Appendix A including determining the total amount of motor vehicle capacity that would be reduced by the new Light Rail transit corridor within five miles of the City of Tigard. Southwest Corridor Plan The Southwest Corridor Plan aims to provide a range of Light Rail transit,bicycle,roadway and pedestrian improvements to communities in southwest Portland and southeast Washington County.Light Rail Alternatives in the Southwest Corridor include options that extend roughly frorn downtown Portland along Barbur Boulevard and/or Interstate 5 to the Tigard City line,through the Tigard Triangle Area with a terminus near Bridgeport Village in Tualatin.Specifics about the particular alignment options can be found at http://www.oregonmetro.goy/public-projects/southwest-corridor-plan. Motor Vehicle Capacity Definition Motor vehicle capacity on a signalized roadway is defined as the maximum number of motor vehicles that can pass through critical Intersections. Many factors affect motor vehicle capacity including lane width, number of lanes,lateral clearance(and rights-of-way),driver characteristics,vehicle types(cars,trucks,buses,etc), roadway alignment and geometry(curves,grades,super elevation,etc),existence of intersections(traffic signals,roundabouts,stop signs),green time allocation at traffic signals, flow speed,weather conditions,the presence of pedestrians, bicycles,on-street parking and other factors. A major consideration in motor vehicle capacity is the design of intersections along arterial roadways(such as traffic signals)and interchanges along freeway segments(where weaving and merging conditions exist). Intersections and interchanges are typically the controlling bottlenecks of traffic flow and the ability of a roadway system to carry traffic efficiently(capacity)is generally diminished in their vicinities.The main consequence of a bottleneck is an immediate reduction in capacity of the roadway. System Bottlenecks There are several roadway system bottlenecks that constrains vehicle traffic along the Barbur Boulevard and Interstate 5 corridor between Tigard and downtown Portland including: Appendix A 50014-74648 Ordinance no 16- __Authorization Ordinance re support for light rail transit service to downtown.DOCX DRF 5 312016 Southwest Corridor Motor vehicle capacity Reduction Analysis May 31,2016 Page 2 • Interstate 5 northbound between Interstate 205 and OR 217 • Interstate 5 northbound at the Terwilliger Boulevard Interchange and the Terwilliger Curves • Interstate 5 northbound at the Marquam Bridge/1-84 interchange/1-405 interchange with US 26 • Interstate 5 southbound at the Hood Avenue on-ramp • Interstate 5 southbound between Interstate 205 and OR 217 • Barbur Boulevard at Terwilliger Boulevard • Barbur Boulevard at Capitol Highway • Barbur Boulevard at Hamilton Street The identification of multiple bottlenecks is important along the freeway section as there are periods of time when vehicle queuing and congestion from a downstream bottleneck,such as the Marquam Bridge(and areas to the north),extends to and through another bottleneck,such as the Terwilliger Curves section. In these cases multiple bottlenecks may link together on top of each other.Therefore it is difficult to quantify a motor vehicle capacity or maximum traffic flow obtainable for sections of the freeway without considering downstream, system influences.The system motor vehicle capacity and downstream bottlenecks must be considered in these situations.The identification and evaluation of these bottlenecks are key as additional capacity at these location influences system capacity. On the other hand,travel lanes could be added at"non-bottleneck"locations along the corridor,yet additional travel lanes in these locations would increase storage for back-ups,but they would not increase the system motor vehicle capacity along the corridor.This is true for both the arterial section of Barbur Boulevard and the Interstate 5 freeway section.Therefore,adding travel lanes or"theoretical capacity" at non-bottleneck locations does not increase the capacity of the corridor roadways. Adding Motor Vehicle Capacity to Interstate 5 or Barbur Boulevard There are many constraints to adding motor vehicle capacity to either Interstate 5 or Barbur Boulevard and the most significant constraint is a lack of right-of-way.Adding a travel lane along Interstate 5 would require widening the roadway for an additional travel lane,widening the shoulders on both sides of the roadway to bring them up to ODOT/US DOT standards,reconstruction of all interchanges,and possibly an adjustment to the roadway alignment to straighten out some of the curved sections to provide adequate sight distance meeting current standards.This would require ODOT to obtain additional right-of-way that they do not currently own. Simply adding another travel lane for short segments would not increase the corridor motor vehicle capacity. Along Barbur Boulevard,improving capacity from today's conditions requires not only additional travel lanes at bottleneck locations,but the addition of standard-width sidewalks,bicycle facilities,ADA treatments,water quality facilities and other improvements to bring the roadway"up to standards".This level of improvement would again require additional right-of-way that is not available. There are locations along both Interstate 5 and Barbur Boulevard where additional travel lanes could be provided within the public rights-of-way.However,simply adding travel lanes does not mean that motor vehicle capacity or system motor vehicle capacity is Increased,because in order to do so,the additional travel lanes need to be provided at bottleneck locations.Even if additional travel lanes are provided at traffic signals,to Appendix A 50014-74648 Ordinance no 16-_Authorization Ordinance re support for light rail transit service to downtown.DOCXDRF59!-2016 Southwest Corridor Motor vehicle capacity Reduction Analysis May 31, 2016 Page 3 improve motor vehicle capacity at a traffic signal,the additional lanes need to be designed in a way that ensure they are effectively used by motor vehicles on order to increase the capacity. Background Traffic Analysis of Barbur Boulevard Corridor TriMet and Metro have undertaken several traffic analysis of the Southwest Corridor based on current assumptions of Light Rail transit' These analyses evaluate the corridor from downtown Portland to Tigard and Tualatin. The traffic analysis prepared for TriMet and Metro demonstrate that based on current project assumptions,the intersection operations analysis showed that with the addition of LRT along Barbar Boulevard,the intersections would either continue to operate within mobility targets'or would not significantly worsen from the No-build conditions.The analysis also demonstrates that the removal of a portion of a travel lane does not necessarily reduce motor vehicle capacity when intersections and traffic signals are involved.If intersections and traffic signals can be designed and operated In a more efficient manner,improved operations and even increased capacity can result. This is demonstrated by the analysis of the Barbur Boulevard/Hamilton Street intersection3. There is also documented evidence that reducing access points on arterials and consolidating access points (including eliminating center left turn lanes)can not only result in improved safety but increased motor vehicle capacity. Current concepts for Light Rail transit for the Southwest Corridor do not significantly reduce or increase the number of motor vehicle lanes along Barbur Boulevard or Interstate 54. However,to accommodate multi-modal access of a transit corridor,some additional traffic signal green time needs to be reallocated from north-south Barbur Boulevard through movements to other minor movements or cross-streets to address pedestrian access needs resulting in a decrease in motor vehicle capacity along Barbur Boulevard.Even without a Light Rail Transit project along the corridor, planned improvements(i.e.Barbur Concept Plan)to accommodate multi-modal access will have an impact to motor vehicle capacity along the corridor. ' SW Corridor Supplemental Refinement Trak Impact Analysis Executive Summary Trak Report, DKS Associates, March 16, 2016 and Final SW Corridor Traffic Analysis and Operations Memorandum,DKS Associates,July 29, 2014. Mobility targets measured through a volume to capacity ratio(v/c ratio). 3 SW Corridor Supplemental Refinement Traffic Impact Analysis Executive Summary Traffic Report, DKS Associates, March 16,2016, Table 2.1 and 2.2 documents that a four-lane Barbur Boulevard between Naito Parkway and Hamilton Street can operate with a lower volume to capacity ratio than the existing configuration with six lanes. 4 Along Interstate 5, three through lanes remain in each direction and along Barbur Boulevard two through lanes remain in each direction. Appendix A 50014-74648 Ordinance no 16- Authorization Ordinance re support for light rail irmusit service to downtown.DOCA1DRh"5 312016 Southwest Corridor Motor vehicle capacity Reduction Analysis May 31,2016 Page 4 Motor vehicle capacity Analysis of Barbur Boulevard Corridor To determine key bottleneck locations along the Barbur Boulevard corridor,recent traffic analysis for the SW Corridor Plan were revieweds with the intention of identifying bottleneck or critical intersections along the currently proposed Light Rail alignment with a future year(2035)volume to capacity ratio of greater than 0.90. The intersections that meet these criteria are: • Barbur Boulevard and 60M Avenue(AM peak) • Barbur Boulevard and CapitolHighway(AM and PM peak) • Barbur Boulevard and 24" Avenue/1-5 SB Off-Ramp(AM peak) • Barbur Boulevard and 19"'Avenue/Capitol Hill Road(AM and PM peak) • Barbur Boulevard and Terwilliger(AM and PM peak) • Barbur Boulevard and Hamilton Street(AM peak) • 4`"Avenue and Caruthers/Broadway(AM peak) Using the Highway Capacity Manual6 analysis at the above identified signalized intersections,the 2035 No-Build and 2035 with Light Rail transit scenarios results in changes in motor vehicle capacity along Barbur Boulevard and are shown in Attachment 1.During the AM peak hour(future year conditions)traffic volumes are very directional on Barbur Boulevard with northbound volumes approximately two to four times greater than southbound traffic volumes.Volume to capacity ratios for the northbound through movements are also significantly higher than the southbound movements as well(see Attachment 1).Therefore,during the AM peak hour,capacity reductions were only considered in the northbound direction.During the PM peak hour(future year conditions)traffic volumes are very balanced in both directions and therefore capacity reductions were considered in both directions on Barbur Boulevard. The 4"'Avenue/Caruthers/Broadway intersection in downtown Portland is controlled by downstream congestion at the 6"'Avenue/Broadway intersection,the on-ramp to 1-405 and other downstream congestion locations.The reconfiguration of this intersection does not impact the motor vehicle capacity of the roadway system in this area of closely spaced traffic signals. Metro has defined a series of Mobility Corridors-for the region and for the Portland Central City to Tigard/Tualatin corridor(Mobility Corridor 2)which includes four parallel routes(including Barbur Boulevard) that would be considered part of the Mobility Corridor.The four routes are all contained within Metro's defined corridor and are listed below(see Attachment 2): • Interstate 5(blue in Attachment 2) 'SW Corridor Supplemental Refinement Traffic Impact Analysis Executive Summary Traffic Report, DKS Associates, March 16,2016 and Final SW Corridor Traffic Analysis and Operations Memorandum, DKS Associates,July 29, 2014. 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,Transportation Research Board,Washington DC, 2000. http://www.oregonmetro.gov/mobility-corridors-atlas Appendix A 500/4-74648 Ordinance no 16- Authorization Ordinance re support for light rail traluil service to do%town.DOCXIDPF/5/3!/20/6 Southwest Corridor Motor vehicle capacity Reduction Analysis May 31,2016 Page 5 • SW Barbur Boulevard(99W),then along Pacific Highway and 72n°Avenue(red in Attachment 2) • SW Macadam Avenue/OR 43/Boones Ferry Road(yellow in Attachment 2) • SW Terwilliger Boulevard/Capitol Highway/Kerr Parkway/Forsberg Road/Carman Drive(green in Attachment 2) Using Metro's Regional Transportation Model,corridor motor vehicle capacity was identified for different segments for each of the four routes(see Table 1). Each corridor's capacity is defined as the most constrained segment along its route. Table 1—Approximate Peak-Hour Directional Motor Vehicle Capacity for Portland Central City to Tigard/Tualatin Mobility Corridor(Based on Metro's Transportation Model and Highway Capacity Manual analysis) Mid- Barbur North segment: Tigard South segment: segment: Terwilliger segment: OR217/Kruse- Corridor Capacity(vehicles per hour)of routes as Portland- - Crossroads- Bridgeport described(peak-hour directional vph) Terwilliger Crossroads OR217/Kruse Village Red route Barbur Blvd-Pacific Hwy- 72nd 1,6001,700' 900 900 Blue route Interstate 5 6,300 6,300 6,300 7,200 Yellow route Macadam/OR 43-Boones Ferry 1,200 700 1,400 1,400 Terwil liger-C.apitol-Kerr-Forsberg Green route 700 700 700 700 Carman Total Corridor Capacity 9,800 9,400 9,300 10,200 Note:'Capacity based on Highway Capacity Manual analysis of corridor signalized intersections There are portions of the corridor that experience no motor vehicle capacity reductions while other portions of the corridor experience slight reductions in motor vehicle capacity. Based on the corridor motor vehicle capacities shown in Table 1 and the motor vehicle capacity reductions shown in Attachment 1,the Project results In a zero to two percent reduction in motor vehicle capacity for the corridor. Appendix A 50014-74648 Ordinance no 16- Authorization Ordinance re support for light rail transit service to downtown.DOCXIDRF15/3//1016 Southwest Corridor Motor vehicle capacity Reduction Analysis May 31,2016 Page 6 Estimate of Unused Public ROW Impacts The project expects to make use of unused public ROW in a number of locations along the various potential alignments. An analysis has been undertaken to determine if the public ROW currently not in use might be useful in the future to increase motor vehicle capacity in the potential Light Rail corridors under consideration. As described earlier in this document, intersections and interchanges are typically the controlling bottlenecks of traffic flow and the ability of a motor vehicle system to carry traffic efficiently(capacity)is generally diminished in their vicinities. In order for the unused ROW to be useful for adding future motor vehicle capacity the unused ROW in question must be in the vicinity(leading up to and through)of existing bottlenecks and be physically accessible to motor vehicles in addition to accommodating other code required facilities. Unused Public ROW available for additional auto capacity is defined as a segment of unused public ROW potentially constrained by a future Light Rail alignment which could otherwise provide adequate width for a travel lane in at least one direction leading up to and through a Critical intersection or bottleneck while also meeting State and City requirements for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This analysis shows that the bottlenecks(critical intersections)are already constrained by a lack of available ROW. The available ROW that is between the critical bottlenecks would not significantly contribute to increasing motor vehicle capacity without first fixing the bottlenecks. The Table in Attachment 3 describes the percent change in lane miles of unused public right of way,excluding any sidewalks,bicycle or other code related facilities,compared to the existing Metro Mobility#2 Corridor lane miles. For all options the percentage reduction is 5%or less. Summary Motor vehicle capacity is defined as the maximum traffic flow obtainable on a given roadway.Many factors affect motor vehicle capacity and detailed analysis is required to consider all these factors.The identification of bottlenecks along both arterial roadways and freeways is important to determine the constraints of roadway system capacity.Simply adding or removing travel lanes on a roadway does not increase/decrease capacity unless it addresses a bottleneck location.For the Southwest Corridor,there are several bottlenecks that are constrained by existing right-of-way and could not deliver added system motor vehicle capacity without acquisition of additional right-of-way. Outside the City of Tigard,to accommodate for multi-modal access for the Southwest Corridor project,some additional traffic signal green time needs to be transferred from north-south Barbar Boulevard through movements to the cross-streets to address pedestrian access needs resulting in a potential reduction in intersection capacity. Even without a Light Rail Transit project along the corridor,improvements to accommodate multi-modal access will have an impact to motor vehicle capacity along Barbur Boulevard. Appendix A 30014-74648 Ordinance no 16- Authorization Ordinance re stippori jor light rail transit service to downtown.DOCXDRF1513111016 Southwest Corridor Motor vehicle capacity Reduction Analysis May 31,2016 Page 7 This detailed traffic analysis indicates that Southwest Corridor Alignment options would result in a zero to two percent reduction of motor vehicle capacity for the corridor. Along Pacific Highway in Tigard,the Southwest Corridor project does not impact facilities or motor vehicle capacity. In the Tigard Triangle area,the Southwest Corridor project adds Light Rail Transit without impacting current roadways while increasing motor vehicle capacity by building out several new connecting roads. The analysis of unused ROW shows that the bottlenecks(critical intersections)are already constrained by a lack of available ROW. The available ROW that is between the critical bottlenecks would not significantly contribute to increasing motor vehicle capacity without first fixing the bottlenecks. The analysis and findings presented herein does not supplant future additional traffic analysis that will be done for the Environmental Impact Statement and reviewed by local jurisdictions. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, DKS Associates A Corporation Peter L.Coffey,PE Principal Appendix A 50014-74648 Ordinance no 16- Authorization Ordinance re support for light rail transit service to downtown.DOCA�DRF15131.12016 Attachment 1 Attachment 1-Through Movement Capacity Reduction Along Barbur Boulevard at Critical Intersections Through Movement Capacity Reduction Including NB Thru Movement Capacity 55 Thru Mwensent Capacity Through Movernent Capacity Reductio[[ Reduction to,fewer buses No-Build fit"uild r LRT w LR`r/c No-Buiid NOBuildv c lRT w LRT v c w/Low ratio for Ng Modera[e ratlo 1m w/low ratio for!IB Moderst. ratio for MB Thru No8udd $8 Thm No-guild Minus e0 Thru Mo-Bued SB Thry No-"Id Minus Critical Intersections Peds Thr: Ped, Ng Thru hds Ihru Veda NB Thru Minus LRT LRT Minus LRT LRT PM Peak Hour 2035 SW Barbur Blvd(Hwv 99W)&SW Capitol Hwy 1 1638 Obl 1866 0.49 2692 0.641 2605 0.81 (228)1 87 i ;1511 �.j 5W Sarbur BIW(Mwv 99W)&SW Capitol Nip Rd/SW 19th Ave 1886 096 1694 0.97 1825 093 1642 0.93 192 183 :ba ts�i SW Sarbur BIW(Mwy 99W)6 SW TenviBiger Blvd 1334 lA) 1140 1.13 1661 0.76 1424 0.82 194 180 ::C 1.e AM Peek Now 2083 SW Barbur Blvd(Mwv 99,W1&60th 1 15341 30 6 SW Sarbur Blvd(Mwv 99W1 A SW Capital Hwv 1521 099 1501 0.90 0.70 0. 17 (7) SW Sarbur thud(Hwv 99WI&24th/1-5 Off-Ramp 2397 090 2410 0.90 0.43 0.41 (13) (37) SW Barbur Blvd(N 99WI&SW Capitol Moll Rd/SW 19th Are MIS 095 1656 1.05 0.45 0.48 210 186 W Barbar Bhrd(Mwy 99W:&SW TerwilMger Blvd 1657 LOO 1S92 0.86 0.30 0.32 6S 41 SW Barbur Blvd(Mwv 991N)&SW Mamihon Sreet 2616 122 2492 1021 025 034 124 100 Not.Capacrty redunons hom mu'nole intKfectW ns are not Nlditve. Noteassumes with LRI.there vnll be a reduct.on 3 12 Doses in eacn d:eawn along Isamu, Boulevard.1 is s equals aoproximately 2 motor veercles fmm a capanry perspective r, n Terwilliger r; Crossroads ' Tigarc` �M �a � _� •L Ooi i i p Attacrent 2 Attachment 3 Reduced Future Moto Vehicle Capacity of Unused Public Right of Way Table Secretary of State Elections Division 1255 Capitol St.NE,Suite 501,Salem,OR 97310 1 p.503.986.1518 1 f.503.373.7414 1 www.oregonvoles.org Notice of City Measure Election SEL 802 rev 01/10 ORS 250.035,250.041, 250.275,250.285,254.095.254.465 City and Notice Information Notice is hereby given on_ 20 16 ,that a measure election will be held in City of Tigard Oregon on November 8 ,2016. Name of City or Cities Date of Election The following shall be the ballot title of the measure to be submitted to the city's voters: Caption 10 words Approve authorization ordinance for light rail high capacity transit corridor. Question 20 words Shall Tigard enact authorization ordinance supporting new high capacity transit corridor extending MAX light rail service, to include downtown Tigard? Summary 175 words A yes vote approves an authorization ordinance allowing Tigard to support a new high capacity transit corridor extending light rail service to Bridgeport, including downtown Tigard (the"Project"). Voter approval is required to allow Tigard to support and accommodate siting of the Project. Amendments to Tigard's land use regulations would allow crossing wetlands with proper mitigation, siting a maintenance facility in all industrial zones, and adding downtown housing density. The Project will be built only if federal grants are secured. The Project is currently estimated to cost$2.0-2.4 billion; federal grants are planned to pay half this cost. No traffic lanes on Pacific Highway would be displaced. Light rail would add road capacity in Tigard, reduce road capacity in Portland, and use vacant public rights of way along roadways. The total amount of road capacity reduced by the Project, on existing roadways within five miles of the City, would be 2% and on unused rights of way would be 5%. Authorization ordinance and detailed Project description available at www. The following authorized city official hereby certifies the above ballot title is true and complete, which includes publication of notice and the completion of the ballot title challenge process. Signature of Authorized City Official not required to be notarized Date Signed mm/dd/yy Printed Name of Authorized City Official Title SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET :1 .. FOR �- 0/ 4 IEll t. .rrroa, U y SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PLAN .' ....•.•.,..•..••,•. (DATE OF MEETING I } High Capacity Transit(HCT} ' o E Options Proposed for Environmental Review `•• .nrrua ; _ 1 = 1 I awry Branch service or direct route HlMadde through Tigard r +^ 1 � m D,rert route Beano, a optiom �F:�ons I Multnomah I village t I x'.M1ds craw dov,nxow � y o.S.Q.r 'bur Barbur Boulevard t 1 Transit or adjacent to 1.5 1tt 1 t euoeu�+ u�aq.twn 1 t ro,�yQ, ,.,��9•. el S -I PCC M,k oowekwn I Sylvania �. Tgsd 1 I a, Clinton crossing, I , I , Ash Avenue,or - Knru - Wall Street Way Adjacent to freight q rail or adjacent to I-5 OPTIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION I L ght Rail DO—, oue,ae t � I 1 e.{ 1 EXISTING ,.... qua, MAX light Ra.l 1 1 � WES Commuter Rail roti atn _ c�., st-etra, fy 3 '-I •- Aonal Tram I� ---- Urt.n Growth R.Uld..y Dowlaoaan Tualatin 0 1 miles l7s '!'-,J�� -- �.4 ., S - I , -1. ]%�4k -2 r 7 jr r IV �, Portlanc SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PLAN z A i g- Proposed light rail alignment -a I_I A option for environmental review. too ' P Ash Avenue ATLANTA HAINES DRAF1 r 6/11/116 BAYLOR 1/16 A A� 7, 0 U M IL ki 1 -t, 0 CLINTON Y W. :,4"-0 0 4. LD z 0 X bike& NO i JP pedestrian < Tigard & I Downtown crossing Triangle 4 54, Tigard Aaj Jr 1W Ilk 0 1 X" OL ow i-17Uki ;004 .4, 4 not Mz 4% A 4n 17 _e_, ED-fit LRT alignment and stations 01 1001 New structure Major alignment-related projects (included In cost estimate) 'A Apt, P Park-and-ride lot: existing with LRT Note:This map is based on current design assumptions. WES Commuter Rail Station locations, structure5,and other characteristics of Bri rig P p n rt the alignment are in draft form and are subject to change through the environmental review process. Village 4'.mile -t,7 P- SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PLAN f +# �--, Portland' �. J�- Proposed light rail alignment option for environmental review: ` .'Alma& �` •, � `' E Clinton Crossing �.r �` " ' di �x_ ... s i•.gpay :: xr- .. - -,r-,ice' - ,� .� , �._ - j�►_ -� *`o....- .m ® �, i HAffJEs DRAFT 6/1/16 s, ,�{'` ti '-�� y ' ^: ,&A OR I ,y, c. a ix "lot 'y'r Il' �Y fyd 1� a � �9 11", zit %7 01M ,�+r`L s 1?, � n s,,v �► s r' bike& Z x .�♦ "A a °. :)--t�.�'l w P Tigard ^ ,.,a Q 1 *A.3o <. -I► ,,r _ pedestrian Triangle ■'" �1a ' -DOWntown 1 _ ° " crossing w �..,,. qua — 14 i~ni 3t �. / Tigard .'� o,� r� IJ ii AN v� eosy►,t, orf+.* a a c y'- "',L, 'r gyp _ '� f` •i j '�.' ,..� fi y . - �`' '�4- r..r: Aim IU .4�e �'t �r li ; . ©111°' IQ 1.11.11W ►+ a '6 1 _A46' .t= ms=s s9 LRT alignment and stations New structure , +,"� •, , $' 'r '' -,, "`�; •••• Major alignment-related projects ' (included in cost estimate) P Park-and-ride lot: existing/with LRT Note:This map is based on current design assumptions. 1,A r y i �•w �'' Station locations,structures, and other characteristics of Bridgeport, 0 0, WES Commuter Rail r the alignment are in draft form and are subject to w M1 '''+°�, Village` review change through the environmental review process ° '/o mile �y .. ., a ,�$ _ .ms's• �'��.m,� b:. "a C. .r r-a �' .4a.''.�h�.°�.� it:�r w SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PLAN - _ I � �� 0-- ' p / 16 LJ wwr t Portland; Proposed light rail alignment �' � ;?'� It -r '_', .W �option for environmental review: ' , +° � p3".. "� t Branch Service � v ATLANTA rgard Branch options :' t ; HAINfY , ' � 3 a Ir DRAFT 6/1/16 . . ;;; ,� , • Clinton Crossing IS 1,f CLINTON i'rs 1``g 40,1" ;, � I►f,. C� •N••••NNN•NNNN•••• 0� z I01 zr i —A WF ,,! "�of.,1�" �► 3r" bike& Tigard ^ a i 4-3, �'~ "A .* d pedestrian Triangle }} Downtown'* � •�•• - crossings �$ I. Tigard110 U .P &'�F9o9 :�� .Ash Avenue 15 '•••.. r ■11we 4 Yv ♦ � � r auto,bike •• "t - ■ � �c ,�� v rel► 1 � � I • y &pedestrian ••• BEVELANO � � � ■- + ' . *?! � .�y ! ' e9 crossing ��• o ''vW " j�•®eat �� ,' ,• '� �,';� •� " : `�. •••• -" ^^"r ■ ` Bridgeport Nl- • ,.� ,- `�y+ • ® Village t � ,. ' ' b� Wa I I Street LRT alignment and stations - ` s1 1 w♦ °.4• s� �vY New structure a► , �� °� . ; , �� '' ff ; •N• Major alignment-related projects Onc uded in cost estimate) P A.S.` P Q Park-and-ride lot:existing/with LRT Note:This map is based on current design assumptions. 1 Station locations,structures,and other characteristics of 4 "W, WES Commuter Rail s i . T the alignment are in draft form and are subject to ? change through the environments(review process. � o +ti mile 41. Y _M111- 1171_ a•rr1�j g4 i n7+i ' r• y� 'a" !_ 2, AIS-2735 3. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 06/07/2016 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: APPOINT CITY CENTER.ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Informational Business Meeting- Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council appoint Cameron Anderly as a voting member, Tim Myshak as a non-voting alternate and Sara Villanueva as a non-voting ex officio member to the City Center Advisory Commission? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of a resolution appointing Cameron Anderly as a voting member of the City Center Advisory Commission whose term will expire December 31, 2017; Tim Myshak as a non-voting alternate whose term will expire December 31, 2016; and Sara Villanueva as a non-voting ex officio member whose term will expire December 31, 2016, KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) is the advisory body to the City Center Development Agency on urban renewal issues. There is currently one vacant voting position on the City Center Advisory Commission with a term that expires on December 31, 2017, due to the resignation of Deanie Bush. There are also up to two non-voting alternate positions and up to two non-voting ex officio positions that are vacant. The Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommended that Cameron Anderly appointed as a voting member whose term will expire December 31, 2017; and Tim Myshak be appointed as a non-voting alternate whose term will expire December 31, 2016. In addition they recommended that Sara Villanueva be appointed as a non-voting ex officio member, as a non-resident who has expertise in affordable housing, whose term will expire December 31, 2016. Villanueva recently became ineligible for her alternate position when she moved out of Tigard city limits, but she meets the eligibility requirements for an ex officio member- a non-resident with expertise in affordable housing. Attachment 1 is a Resolution implementing these recommended appointees. Attachment 2 has biographical information on all three recommended appointees. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could decide to not approve some, or all, of the recommendations. This would necessitate reopening the recruitment. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION January 12, 2016, Appoint CCAC members Attachments Resolution CCAC Bios CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION APPOINTING CAMERON ANDERLY AS A VOTING MEMBER OF THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION, TIM MYSHAK AS A NON-VOTING ALTERNATE MEMBER AND SARA VII..LANUEVA AS A NON-VOTING EX OFFICIO MEMBER WHEREAS, there currently exists one vacancy for voting members, up to two vacancies for non-voting alternate members, and up to two vacancies for non-voting ex officio members on the City Center Advisory Commission;and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint Cameron Anderly as a voting member;and WHEREAS,the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint Tim Myshak as a non-voting alternate member. WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint Sara Villanueva as a non-voting ex officio member. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Cameron Anderly is appointed as voting member to fill a term that expires December 31, 2017. SECTION 2: Tim Myshak is appointed as an alternate member to fill a term that expires December 31,2016. SECTION 3: Sara Villanueva is appointed as an ex officio member to fill a term that expires December 31,2016. SECTION 4: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2016. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 16- Page 1 Attachment 2 CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPOINTEES BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION On June 7, 2016,Tigard City Council will consider a Resolution to appoint Cameron Anderly as a voting member,Tim Myshak as a non-voting alternate member and Sara Villanueva as a non-voting ex officio member of the City Center Advisory Commission. Cameron Anderly has been a Tigard resident since 2015. He is an attorney with Luby Daraee Law Group, PC. He also has a background in construction engineering. He has volunteer experience with the American Heart Association and the Oregon Food Bank. Tim Myshak has been a Tigard resident for thirty years. He is a controller for Complete Distribution Services, a freight brokerage company with an office on Main Street. He has been the treasurer or finance member of various non-profit organizations and a youth leader with the Tigard Recreation Association and St. Matthew Lutheran Church. Sara Villanueva was an alternate member of the CCAC until May 2016. She works as a Senior Community Manager with Princeton Property Management and has eight years experience managing multi-family properties utilizing a wide variety of affordable housing programs. She has previously volunteered with the Kiwanis Club and at Twality Middle School. AGENDA ITEM No. 3 Date: June 7, 2016 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: Informational Public Hearing — DISCUSS SW CORRIDOR BALLOT MEASURE This is a Cite of Tigard public meeting, subject to the state of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. _=_ll written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in Cite of'Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 3 Date: June 7, 2016 PLEASE PRINT This is a Cite of'Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. .ll written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in Cite of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Pro onent—(Speaking In Favor Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. -Tim (53M !l 3-71 -5,�A/ qnv.,Z 30(A4 (-4 ).SID--7077 �j " (��9 �(2� Name,address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone o. eft Itic— AO&AWS OtI4 r,4-f411. q57 � so r.Phzor,,4 Pven , 9�Z23 7d� �a d�Sd 6 C), n Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. NAddress&Phone N � M.1V I �J /-7Y Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. AIS-2700 4, CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 06/07/2016 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: RECEIVE BROWNFIELD PROGRAM UPDATE Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Update, Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Brownfield Program Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Board is requested to provide feedback on the program. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On May 20th, the City Center Development Agency was notified that it was awarded two $200,000 EPA Brownfield grants to clean up the Main Street/Fanno Creek (Saxony) properties. The Brownfield grant program is highly competitive- only five out of the twenty applications submitted in EPA Region 10 (Oregon, Washington,Alaska, and Idaho) were selected for funding this year. The EPA funding will play a critical role in developing these prominent underutilized properties. The funding lays the groundwork for a planned mixed-used project and public space overlooking Fanno Creek. The redevelopment will support the urban renewal plan's goal of making downtown the interconnected green heart of the community. EPA funds are typically available in October of the year granted. Agency staff will work with the EPA on developing a work plan, which will include community engagement, clean-up planning, completing clean-up activities (including testing, demolition and soil removal) and obtaining a No Further Action finding from Oregon DEQ. A Request for Proposals for an environmental clean-up firm would likely be issued in October. The clean-up grant builds on the City's Brownfield program, funded by the $400,000 EPA Brownfields assessment grant, awarded in July 2014. To date, approximately $128,000 has been expended on public outreach, developing an inventory of potential opportunity sites, and environmental site assessment work (including environmental investigations and testing that led to the Prospective Purchaser Agreement with which the Main Street/Fanno Creek property was purchased.) Several grant-funded Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments are currently underway: •Nicoli and Tigard Transit Center: pre-development work, funded by the Metro CET grant, is underway to redevelop these sites into mixed use urban lofts. Tigard's cash match for the grant will be provided by the grant funded environmental assessment reports. •Yoo property and Washington County owned land (corner of Hall Blvd. and Pacific Highway): A property owner on Hall Blvd. near Pacific Highway requested assistance to assess her property in anticipation of redevelopment. The neighboring property, the former site of an auto repair business purchased by Washington County for the Hall/Pacific Highway intersection widening, will also be assessed. •City acquisition of road right-of-way on Fields property: The City of Tigard is interested in extending SW Wall Street from its southern terminus, east to SW Tech Center Drive and the proposed extension will cross a property currently owned by the Fred W. Fields Revocable Living Trust. This is part of the Hunziker Industrial/Commercial Core project to catalyze commercial and industrial development and increase employment on 138 acres. The site assessment will be performed as part of the city's due diligence in acquiring land for the construction of the road. The EPA assessment grant runs through July 7, 2017,however the city will likely request a one year extension. Staff is currently developing outreach materials, including direct mail and an improved webpage, to communicate with property owners about the benefits of the program, particularly those who may have petroleum contamination. OTHER ALTERNATIVES This is an informational presentation only. No action is being requested. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goal 9.1 Develop and maintain a strong, diversified, and sustainable local economy Goal 9.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business Tigard Strategic Plan Goal 2: Ensure development advances the vision City Council 2015-17 Goals and Milestones Make Downtown a Place Where People Want to Be DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION December 1, 2015: Brownfield Initiative Update December 1, 2015: Resolution Authorizing EPA Brownfield Cleanup Grant Application June 2, 2015: Brownfield Initiative Update February 10, 2015 Local Contract Review Board - Make contract award for Brownfields grant funded services January 27, 2015 Local Contract Review Board- Consider contract award for Brownfields grant funded services January 14, 2014 Consider a Resolution Approving an Application for an EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant Attachments No files) attached. �• ,� F• � �k,�s , '� �i�tl�R' �T � Sl� O �T �'Z'; l*� lnw.� � t"aK, �'(%,�.t' j ��k,{ � 'a-+� .�= flan '• � 4 n JJI I� J- v f ti. +n. ^r,4 1' , ' `„ '\; IF,x� fi. `[-.,�� G..:. L TAY~• l e 1 .t�f�Y'1 4` - '-�`` L + t i y v- CAG rp T 64 r. Main Street /Fanno Creek properties RESOLVE A Tigard Mixed Use / Public Space Design ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING � tj �y. 4a 1. .`L',�`j r 4 •- i s+ �:.c 21, r' �` lilt Ak JI ISAQ Ir lip Ak Axo 1 I {4 , ESI ,r`t � y \ 'f3'��•- �' y,p�A`s, � ,r�� Y � �. N�'' �;. f xX r10.Y � w� „�.. + Ca +t 't'�?t'r i. #�� 4•t � �, art �.�� 7 � _ AIS-2716 5. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 06/07/2016 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING: FISCAL YEAR 2016 CCDA FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET HEARING Prepared For: Toby LaFrance Submitted By: Carissa Collins, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Business Informational Meeting - Main Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication 06/02/2016 Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE A fourth quarter budget adjustment is required for the FY 2016 City Center Development Agency (CCDA) adopted budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve the FY 2016 Fourth Quarter Supplemental KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY An additional appropriation in the amount of$25,360 is being requested resulting from the sale and purchase of properties by the CCDA. 1. A total of$15,360 is needed for payment of the FY 2015 property taxes for the Ferguson properties. The tenants have been invoiced by the city for the payment. 2. A total of$10,000 is required to pay the escrow and title fees from the sale of the Ash/Burnham site by the CCDA. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the amendment. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Revitalization of Downtown DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $25,360 Budgeted (yes or no): no Where Budgeted (department/program): CCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: A total of$25,360 of additional appropriations is required for payment of the FY 2015 property taxes for Ferguson {15,360}, and fees related to the escrow and title for the sale of the Ash/Burnham property {$10,000). Exhibit A has the details. Attachments Resolution Exhibit A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE FY 2016 ADOPTED BUDGET FOR THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY. WHEREAS,the city acknowledges those items that were unknown at the time the FY 2016 Budget was adopted;and WHEREAS, the CCDA recognizes a total of$25,360 in additional requirements that are offset by additional resources of equal amount. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the Tigard City Center Development Agency that: SECTION 1: The FY 2015-16 Budget is hereby amended as detailed in Exhibit A. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of ,2016. Chair—City of Tigard City Center Development Agency ATTEST: Recorder—City of Tigard City Center Development Agency CCDA Resolution No. 16- Page 1 FY 2016 Fourth Quarter Budget Supplemental Exhibit A CCDA_01. Property purchase/sale related tees An additional appropriation totaling$25,360 is needed for the folloNving: 1. A request in the amount of 815,360 is needed for the M'2015 property taxes for the Ferguson property. The tenants have been invoiced by the city for reimbursement of the payment. 2. A total of$10,000 is required to pay the escrow and title fees related to the sale of the Ash/Burnham property. As a result of this action,reserve for future expenditure within the Urban Renewal Debt Service Fund will decrease by$10,000 with an increase in transfers.In turn,Charges for Services will increase by$15,360 in the Urban Renewal Capital Improvement Fund.Community Development program expenditures will increase by 25,360. Fund 1 of 2 Q3 Q4 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Urban Renewal Debt Service Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 185,697 $ 185,697 Property Taxes S 397,792 S 397,792 Ir1I -t Farnings S I.nnn I p''11 Total Resources $ 584,489 $ $ 584,489 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ $ - DebtScraice S 219,198 S 219,198 Loans S - $ - Work-In-Progress S - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 190,300 S 10,000 S 200,300 Contingency S - Total Budget $ 409,498 $ 10,000 $ 419,498 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 174,991 $ (10,000) $ 164,991 Total Requirements $ 584,489 $ - $ 584,489 Fund 2 of 2 Q3 Q4 Revised Rc,ised Budget Amendment Budget Urban Renewal.Capital Improvement Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 445,700 $ 445,700 Charges for Services S 84,000 S 15,360 S 99,360 Transfers In from(hhcr Funds S 190,300 S 10,000 S 200,300 Total Resources $ 720,000 $ 252360 $ 745,360 Requirements Community Development S - S 25,360 S 25,360 Program Expenditures Total $ $ 25,360 $ 25,360 Debt Service S $ - Loans $ $ - Work-In-Progress $ 720,000 $ 720,0(N) "Transfers to Other Funds S - S Contingency S S Total Budget $ 720,000 $ 25,360 $ 745,360 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ - $ - $ Total Requirements S 7311,000 $ 25,360 $ 745,360 AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: June 7, 2016 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: Informational Public Hearing — FISCAL YEAR 2016 CCDA FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET This is a Cite of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. _.11 written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in Cite of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: June 7, 2016 PLEASE PRINT This is a Cite of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon'.public meeting and records laws. --'Il written and oral testimoni,become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in Cite of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent— S eakin Against) Neutral Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,.Address&Phone No. — lv� E Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phon�No. Name,address&Phone No. �} V �\VV Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. AIS-2608 6. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 06/07/2016 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Legislative Public Hearing: Consider Recreation Program Fee Ordinance Prepared For: Aaron Rivera Submitted By: Judy Lawhead, Public Works Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Legislative Business Meeting- Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall Council adopt an ordinance granting the Public Works Director authority to establish, reduce, and otherwise administer Recreation Program fees and charges? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends Council adopt the ordinance delegating authority to the Public Works Director to administer the Recreation Program fees and charges KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On May 17, 2016, Council directed staff to bring forward an ordinance delegating authority to the Public Works Director to administer Recreation Program fees and charges. The city's existing code (TMC 3.32 City Fees and Charges) does not allow the Recreation Program to grant scholarships to participants (i.e. Exemptions in code, 3.32.070), nor does it allow for the most efficient and effective means to quickly respond to dynamic public demand for recreation classes. The Recreation Program expects to establish a number of new program fees, and seeks a means to more rapidly navigate administrative processes. Overall, the proposed ordinance allows the Public Works Department to more efficiently and effectively implement Recreation programs and services. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Alternatives include the status quo, wherein the Recreation Program would not be allowed to grant fee reductions to participants, and ultimately require Council adoption of each fee before agreements can be finalized and schedules distributed publicly. Other alternatives will be explored if the ordinance is not passed by council. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Tigard City Council Goals, #1 Provide Recreation Opportunities for the People of Tigard, 2015. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION The council was briefed on this ordinance at its May 17, 2016, meeting. Fiscal Impact Cost: 0 Budgeted (yes or no): 0 Where Budgeted (department/program): 270/6150 Additional Fiscal Notes: If Council passes this ordinance it will result in additional fee revenue in the Park Utility Fund, although the magnitude and timing is indeterminate at this time. Revenue is likely to be proportionate to the volume, cost, and other factors associated with programmatic offerings. Attachments Ordinance Exhibit A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.32 CITY FEES AND CHARGES TO DELEGATE FEE SETTING FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR WHEREAS, the nature of providing recreation activities and coordinating program services with existing providers requires the ability of the Recreation Program Coordinator to quickly respond to customer demand;and WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.32 requires Council to review and adopt rates for fees, typically done in May for the upcoming year;and WHEREAS,the Code currently does not provide for an effective mechanism to adjust fees to target specific groups or lower income individuals;and WHEREAS,the Code currently restricts fee exemptions to nonprofit organizations,limiting the ability to offer scholarships and other reductions to fees/charges;and WHEREAS,the Code requires rates for fees and charges to be based solely upon the reasonably determined cost for service cost of service and does not allow for flexibility;and WHEREAS,the 2015-2017 Tigard City Council Goals include to"Provide Recreation Opportunities for the People of Tigard;"and WHEREAS,the MIG Recreation Program Study: Recommendations and Implementation Plan outlined a five year plan to start a recreation program including assumptions about demand-driven activities expanding yearly,coordination with existing service providers, and grants and scholarships for targeted groups;and WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to delegate its authority to set fees and charges for the Recreation Program to the Public Works Director in order to allow for greater flexibility and further the goal of promoting recreation opportunities. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Chapter 3.32, is amended as shown in Exhibit A, (added language is shown in italics and deleted language in sfiriketlrengh)- SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the mayor,and posting by the city recorder. PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of ,2016. ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 1 Carol A Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 52016. John L.Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 2 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 3.32 CITY FEES AND CHARGES. adoption of a City Council resolution. (Ord. 02- 06,Ord. 82-72 §2, 1982). Sections: 3.32.030 Method Of Determining Rates 3.32.010 Definitions. For Fees And Charges. 3.32.020 Authority. 3.32.030 Method Of Determining Rates 1. Rates shall be based upon the reasonably For Fees And Charges. determined costs for service and shall be based 3.32.040 Administration. upon estimates from the current or proposed 3.32.050 Fee Adjustments And municipal budget for the following categories, as Schedules. applicable: 3.32.060 Failure To Pay Fees And Charges. a. Materials and services; 3.32.070 Exemptions. 3.32.080 Ratification. b. Capital outlay; 3.32.010 Definitions. c. Indirect costs; For the purposes of this chapter, the singular d. Depreciation costs; and shall include the plural and the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter. As used in e. Personnel costs. this chapter,unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall apply: 2. In no case shall the rate for fees and charges exceed the reasonable costs for the service "Fees and charges"means the following: or services provided. (Ord. 82-72 §3, 1982). 1. Fees and charges established for City 3.32.040 Administration. services provided under this code; The City Finance Director, or designee, shall 2. Fees and charges for the dedication and be authorized to require a specific type of payment, vacation of streets and other public areas within the in the event of a prior history of nonpayment, City; returned checks,and incidence of delayed,reduced or unpaid fees and charges. For applications 3. Any other fee or charge established by which are subsequently withdrawn, the Finance the Council in which the Council specifically states Director,upon recommendation of the department that the fee or charge is to be subject to the head, may refund any or all of the fee amount not provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 82-72 §1, 1982). necessary to recover City costs incurred through the date of withdrawal. (Ord. 82-72 §4, 1982). 3.32.020 Authority. 3.32.050 Fee Adjustments And The Tigard City Council shall have the Schedules. authority to review and adopt by resolution rates for fees and charges reasonably related to the City's After January 1, 1983,adjustments in the rate cost of service. The City Manager shall have of fees and charges shall be reviewed by the authority to set interim fees and charges pending Council at least annually, on or before July 1st of 3-32-1 Code Update: 03116 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE any year. The Council shall consider the amount of the fee shall be doubled and the following in adjustments to fees and charges: (a) difference shall be deemed a penalty. (Ord. 82-72 the Portland Consumer Price Index; (b) the total §6, 1982). wage increase in relevant union contracts;(c)costs for services analyses; and (d) the provisions of 3.32.070 Exemptions. Section 3.32.030.(Ord. 82-72 §5, 1982). The City Council is authorized to waive or 3.32.060 Failure To Pay Fees And exempt the fee or charge imposed upon an Charges. application or for the use of City facilities and services, if a nonprofit organization requests such 1. All persons submitting applications or a waiver in writing and the Council determines that otherwise utilizing services or facilities of the City community benefit from the proposed activity shall pay the appropriate fee or charge imposed outweighs the financial burden on the City. The pursuant to this chapter. waiver or exemption shall not excuse the nonprofit organization from compliance with other 2. If the fee or charge for an application is requirements of this code. (Ord. 82-72 §7, 1982). governed by the provisions of this chapter, failure to pay the same in full shall prevent the submission 3.32.080 Ratification. of such application. If such application is accepted through mistake or inadvertance,the City The Council determines that fees previously Finance Director shall give a notice of the balance set by resolutions of the Council were set to recover due of such fee or charge, which balance shall be cost and are hereby ratified pursuant to the paid within ten days of the giving of such notice. ordinance codified in this chapter and shall remain The Finance Director may waive the penalty if the in effect until superseded pursuant to the ordinance failure to pay the full fee or charge was not the fault codified in this chapter. (Ord. 82-72 §8, 1982). of the applicant. An aggrieved applicant may appeal the penalty decision of the Director to the 3.32.090 Recreation Program Council. If the fee or charge is unpaid after the ten-day period has expired,the application shall be considered withdrawn. Where action or work for 1. For purposes of the Public Works which any permit is required under City code is Department Recreation Program, City Council started or proceeded with prior to obtaining said delegates its authority to adopt rates and charges, permit,the fees specified shall be doubled. pursuant to Section 3.32.020, to the Director of Public Works. 3. For all other fees and charges subject to this ordinance and not involving an application,the 2. Notwithstanding Section 3.32.070, the City Finance Director shall give notice of Public Works Director shall have the authority to delinquency in writing,if a fee or charge is unpaid. waive, exempt, or otherwise reduce recreation Such fee or charge shall be paid within ten days of program fees and charges. the sending of such notice and, in addition, a delinquency fee in an amount to be established by 3. The Public Works Director shall annually the Council by resolution and sufficient to cover report back to Council on the Recreation Program the cost of administration of such fee shall also be activities and revenues. imposed. If the fee or charge is unpaid at the end of the ten-day notification period, the initial 3-32-2 Code Update: 03116 AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: June 7, 2016 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: Legislative Public Hearing — CONSIDER RECREATION PROGRAM FEE ORDINANCE This is a Cite of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. _=_ll written and oral testimoni,become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of'persons who attend or participate in Cite of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: June 7, 2016 PLEASE PRINT This is a Cite of'Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. .:ll written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly, available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in Cite of'Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Pro onent— Speaking In Favor Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. AIS-2733 7. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 06/07/2016 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD BRIEFING ON PROCESS FOR CIVIC CENTER CONTRACT Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Meeting Type: Local Staff Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE A briefing on an upcoming contract for services related to the Civic Center Visioning project and the process that will be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff is seeking Council direction on any additional information or direction they would like to see in preparation of an award decision for the proposed contract or process. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The city needs a consultant team to study alternatives for growth, projected use of and placement of a City-owned Civic Center. The city owns and is a tenant on many properties, some adequate for their use, others inadequate in size or location for their function and operations to provide city services. This work will be used to determine what services and staff will be located on the proposed Civic Center site. The scope also includes studying the potential inclusion of a future recreation center and performing arts center. The planning process is intended to be comprehensive and lead to adoption of a Civic Center Visioning Plan that will provide the framework for a 2017 bond measure. The plan will also inform facilities planning for 20 years. The final report will incorporate cost estimates, including associated infrastructure, for recommended future Civic Center facilities. Work tasks under the proposed contract include: •Review and confirm existing data/reports •Recommendations to maximize city functions on the Civic Center site, given projected patterns of growth, best practices and anticipated changes in the way cities deliver services. Supportive information for a preferred alternative will include research, best practices precedents from other/like cities, survey feedback from existing residents and financial data to support findings and recommendations •Engage City staff for input on needs, standards, and priorities •Service Analysis: The city is looking to the selected consultant to research trends and anticipated changes in delivery of services related to future growth, citizen expectations, and technological advances •Incorporate issues identified with the Building Conditions Assessment (done under separate contract with Facilities) into the proposal. These will include long-term operational risks of maintaining City-owned facilities at their current locations (e.g. building deficiencies, hazards, seismic analysis, O&M, life cycle costs, accessibility, need and potential for expansion or renovation) •Identify any natural or man-made hazards of siting the proposed Civic Center facilities at the current location. (e.g. floodplain, seismic/liquefiable soils, hazardous material storage, steep slope/landslide, wild land fire, security risks •Identify strategies that will maximize the continuity of operations for City-owned facilities. (e.g. relocate outside of hazard areas, seismic retrofit, backup power, risk mitigation measures) •Include opportunities for purchase of adjacent properties •Provide phasing opportunities based on the findings of the visioning plan •Include opportunities for urban renewal efforts •Develop and implement a stakeholder engagement plan during the planning process (may include interaction with internal city stakeholder committee and citizens) •Once a preferred path forward is identified, assist with a public relations strategy for the city to achieve public support of a voter-approved bond measure •Presentation of proposed plan to City Council Under Tigard's Public Contracting Rule (PCR) 10.110, the Local Contract Review Board is able to exempt particular contracts from formal competitive process requirements. Due to the nature of this project and the lack of a successful proposer generated under a previous Request for Proposal, staff is recommending an exemption be declared for this work. Staff intends to bring a resolution for the exemption before the Local Contract Review Board in a public hearing during their meeting on June 14, 2016. The following are key facts regarding the proposed project and the exemption declaration as required under PCR 10.110: Project Name: Civic Center Visioning Project (CIP #91020 - Citywide Facilities Plan) Budget: FY 16 Adopted = $300,000 ($295,000 for design and engineering, $5,000 for internal project management). The city's Proposed FY 17 budget, as approved by Budget Committee, increases this amount to $350,000 with a split of$300,000 for design and engineering and $50,000 for internal project management, with the majority of work to occur in FY17. Previous Formal Competitive Process Efforts for the Project: A formal Qualification-based Request for Proposals (QBS) was issued in January of this year. A well attended pre-proposal meeting was held and staff fielded a multitude of questions from interested firms as well as provided additional information on the project. Upon closing, the city only received one proposal and that was deemed non-responsive as the approach was significantly different than the preferred city approach. The city heard from a number of consultants that were expected to submit proposals that the nature of this project did not lend itself to a formal QBS approach but rather a consulting team assembled directly. Time and the accelerated schedule was also provided as a reason that a few of the consultants chose not to respond to the original RFP. Proposed Alternative Contracting Practice to be Employed: Under an exemption from a formal competitive process, the City would contract directly with an architectural firm who would then build a team of consultants with the appropriate combination of skill and experience to best deliver this project to the city. Through the prior process, staff learned from a number of the prospective consultants that this is a more traditional approach to such a project. Cost Savings Anticipated from Exemption: Staff anticipates cost savings under this approach by not running a full QBS process a second time, and also by eliminating the possibility that such a process may once again lead to no contract. Time is of the extreme essence to complete this work. If the city is to have any chance of a November 2017 ballot for a facilities bond, the plan must be completed and information finalized before spring 2017. Entering into a contract under the exemption declaration will secure a contract with just enough time to complete the work. If a QBS was carried out and no consultant selected, the city would have little to no chance of meeting the required timeframe. Estimated Contract Execution Date: If the exemption is granted on June 14, 2016, staff anticipates a contract for the work will be executed no later than June 20, 2016. At this time, staff is seeking the Local Contract Review Board's input for to any additional information it needs to determine the validity of the exemption request. Due to the tight timeframe for this project, such information will likely be included in the Council Thursday packet or discussed during the meeting on June 14, 2016. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may reject the declaration of an exemption for this project and direct staff to issue a formal QBS solicitation for the work. Staff advises the Local Contract Review Board that such a process would likely result in failure to meeting a possible November 2017 ballot. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION This is the first time this contract has come before the Local Contract Review Board. Fiscal Impact Cost: $300,000 Budgeted (yes or no): yes Where budgeted?: Facilities Capital Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: The project is currently budgeted for FY16 (current budget year). The unsuccessful effort to contract with a consultant team has delayed project start. The Proposed FY17 budget, as approved by the Budget Committee, has $300,000 appropriated for external design and engineering work on this project in FY17. Attachments No files) attached. Ciry,f SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET Tigard,and� g mwa architects FOR Oregon R r �°l 6 M., , � _ (DA'C'E OF MEETING) PLAN SUMMARY - TIGARD CIVIC CENTER Alend-a-- He`7l 7 2016 2017 FebJune JLIIY Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Mar A. Phase 1: Information GathIM11 Phase 11: Planning/DesignI Develop Project Initial Decision- Start Conceptual Plans-All Facilities Renderings- Plan and 3D For Bond Framework by Tigard Re-use/New Buildings Initial Schedule Adjusted Schedule Phasing Plan Final-Schedule Engage Cost Consultant Draft-Cost Model Discuss/Decide- Final-Cost Model With Civic Center Facilities Project Delivery Model Project Delivery Model Programming/Need Assessments- Initial Decision- Draft-Facilities Plan Final- Facility Plan Draft-Civic Center Plan Final- Civic Center Plan Progressive Meeting Format Community Facilities (Narrative Only) Initial Decision-Program Distribution,Who Goes Where? Progressive Meeting Consultant Contracts Engage Futuring Engage Community Initial Findings- Data Collection and Analysis Recommendations Consultant(Fundraising) Stakeholders- Initial Program vs.Input From Progressive Meeting Futuring Consultant Asset Management Site Investigations- Review and Evaluate Site Engage remaining consultants:Mechanical, Electrical,Plumbing,Structural,Civil,and Specialty(As Needed)Consultants Consultant(Real Estate) Aquisition Strategies Investigation Findings Engage Land Land Use Strategy Start- Land Use Planning Use Consultant (Transportation) Engage Parking Parking Study Consultant Engage Public Workshops and Public Create- Public Involvement Plan Public Vetting Final Public Plan Involvement Firm Involvement Framework Engage Public Opinion Develop- Start-Bond Process and Schedule Ballot Drafting Final Ballot Consultant(Bond) Bond Process and Schedule City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting �� In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinance(s) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, kx ((L/ , being first duly sworn, by oath, depose and say: I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) which were adopted at the City Council meeting of -70 261 , with a copy(s) of said Ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the day of QLAA/Lg , 20 /ld. 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon Sig ature of ferson wh erf med Posting Subscribed and sworn before me this 53'+qday of Q)t4 vie , 20 16, by OFFICIAL STAMP } CAROL ANN K OREGON 2�C ;* NOTARY PUBLIC - COMMISSION NO.924954 :y\°(�iMM1SSI0N EXPIRES FEB 117 2019 No Public - State of Ore n I:\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING-ORDINANCE.DOC CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 16- 0q AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.32 CITY FEES AND CHARGES TO DELEGATE FEE SETTING FOR RECREATION PROGRAMS TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR WHEREAS, the nature of providing recreation activities and coordinating program services with existing providers requires the ability of the Recreation Program Coordinator to quickly respond to customer demand;and WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.32 requires Council to review and adopt rates for fees, typically done in May for the upcoming year;and WHEREAS,the Code currently does not provide for an effective mechanism to adjust fees to target specific groups or lower income individuals;and WHEREAS, the Code currently restricts fee exemptions to nonprofit organizations,limiting the ability to offer scholarships and other reductions to fees/charges;and WHEREAS,the Code requires rates for fees and charges to be based solely upon the reasonably determined cost for service cost of service and does not allow for flexibility;and WHEREAS,the 2015-2017 Tigard City Council Goals include to "Provide Recreation Opportunities for the People of Tigard;"and WHEREAS, the MIG Recreation Program Study: Recommendations and Implementation Plan outlined a five year plan to start a recreation program including assumptions about demand-driven activities expanding yearly,coordination with existing service providers,and grants and scholarships for targeted groups;and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to delegate its authority to set fees and charges for the Recreation Program to the Public Works Director in order to allow for greater flexibility and further the goal of promoting recreation opportunities. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Chapter 3.32, is amended as shown in Exhibit A, (added language is shown in italics and deleted language in sEjtlethreugh).. SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the mayor,and posting by the city recorder. PASSED: By L//)lj,Cj//Xtio.l vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only, this 7't'- day of 32016. ORDINANCE No. 16-0,1 Page 1 Carol A Krager,City RecorderU APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this -74~day of 2016. IV Jo L. Cook, ayor Apprgved as to form: �Attney 0 1-2 /P OlG Date ORDINANCE No. 16- U Page 2 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 3.32 CITY FEES AND CHARGES. adoption of a City Council resolution. (Ord. 02- 06,Ord. 82-72 §2, 1982). Sections: 3.32.030 Method Of Determining Rates 3.32.010 Definitions. For Fees And Charges. 3.32.020 Authority. 3.32.030 Method Of Determining Rates 1. Rates shall be based upon the reasonably For Fees And Charges. determined costs for service and shall be based 3.32.040 Administration. upon estimates from the current or proposed 3.32.050 Fee Adjustments And municipal budget for the following categories, as Schedules. applicable: 3.32.060 Failure To Pay Fees And Charges. a. Materials and services; 3.32.070 Exemptions. 3.32.080 Ratification. b. Capital outlay; 3.32.010 Definitions. c. Indirect costs; For the purposes of this chapter, the singular d. Depreciation costs; and shall include the plural and the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter. As used in e. Personnel costs. this chapter,unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall apply: 2. In no case shall the rate for fees and charges exceed the reasonable costs for the service "Fees and charges"means the following: or services provided. (Ord. 82-72 §3, 1982). 1. Fees and charges established for City 3.32.040 Administration. services provided under this code; The City Finance Director, or designee, shall 2. Fees and charges for the dedication and be authorized to require a specific type of payment, vacation of streets and other public areas within the in the event of a prior history of nonpayment, City; returned checks,and incidence of delayed,reduced or unpaid fees and charges. For applications 3. Any other fee or charge established by which are subsequently withdrawn, the Finance the Council in which the Council specifically states Director,upon recommendation of the department that the fee or charge is to be subject to the head, may refund any or all of the fee amount not provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 82-72 §1, 1982). necessary to recover City costs incurred through the date of withdrawal. (Ord. 82-72 §4, 1982). 3.32.020 Authority. 3.32.050 Fee Adjustments And The Tigard City Council shall have the Schedules. authority to review and adopt by resolution rates for fees and charges reasonably related to the City's After January 1, 1983,adjustments in the rate cost of service. The City Manager shall have of fees and charges shall be reviewed by the authority to set interim fees and charges pending Council at least annually, on or before July 1st of 3-32-1 Code Update: 03116 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE any year. The Council shall consider the amount of the fee shall be doubled and the following in adjustments to fees and charges: (a) difference shall be deemed a penalty. (Ord. 82-72 the Portland Consumer Price Index; (b) the total §6, 1982). wage increase in relevant union contracts;(c)costs for services analyses; and (d) the provisions of 3.32.070 Exemptions. Section 3.32.030.(Ord. 82-72 §5, 1982). The City Council is authorized to waive or 3.32.060 Failure To Pay Fees And exempt the fee or charge imposed upon an Charges. application or for the use of City facilities and services, if a nonprofit organization requests such 1. All persons submitting applications or a waiver in writing and the Council determines that otherwise utilizing services or facilities of the City community benefit from the proposed activity shall pay the appropriate fee or charge imposed outweighs the financial burden on the City. The pursuant to this chapter. waiver or exemption shall not excuse the nonprofit organization from compliance with other 2. If the fee or charge for an application is requirements of this code. (Ord. 82-72 §7, 1982). governed by the provisions of this chapter, failure to pay the same in full shall prevent the submission 3.32.080 Ratification. of such application. If such application is accepted through mistake or inadvertance,the City The Council determines that fees previously Finance Director shall give a notice of the balance set by resolutions of the Council were set to recover due of such fee or charge, which balance shall be cost and are hereby ratified pursuant to the paid within ten days of the giving of such notice. ordinance codified in this chapter and shall remain The Finance Director may waive the penalty if the in effect until superseded pursuant to the ordinance failure to pay the full fee or charge was not the fault codified in this chapter. (Ord. 82-72 §8, 1982). of the applicant. An aggrieved applicant may appeal the penalty decision of the Director to the 3.32.090 Recreation Program Council. If the fee or charge is unpaid after the ten-day period has expired,the application shall be considered withdrawn. Where action or work for 1. For purposes of the Public Works which any permit is required under City code is Department Recreation Program, City Council started or proceeded with prior to obtaining said delegates its authority to adopt rates and charges, permit,the fees specified shall be doubled. pursuant to Section 3.32.020, to the Director of Public Works. 3. For all other fees and charges subject to this ordinance and not involving an application,the 2. Notwithstanding Section 3.32.070, the City Finance Director shall give notice of Public Works Director shall have the authority to delinquency in writing,if a fee or charge is unpaid. waive, exempt, or otherwise reduce recreation Such fee or charge shall be paid within ten days of program fees and charges. the sending of such notice and, in addition, a delinquency fee in an amount to be established by 3. The Public Warks Director shall annually the Council by resolution and sufficient to cover report back to Council on the Recreation Program the cost of administration of such fee shall also be activities and revenues. imposed. If the fee or charge is unpaid at the end of the ten-day notification period, the initial 3-32-2 Code Update: 03116