Loading...
07/23/1997 - Packet Book • INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD MEETING Serving Ti" >Kmg'Ei y,.Dur�lianz yard 'Unincorpozated Area A� 1�I�JA Wednesday, July 23, 1997 5:30 p.m. 1. :Call to Order 2. Roll:Catf-And Introductions 3''. Visitor.Comments 4: Approve May 14., 1.997 Meeting M-inutes 5. Director's Report 6. Non:-.A ei da Items ..g . 7. Executive Session 8. Ad�oirmnent Executive*:Session: The Intergovernmental Water Board may. go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192..660.(1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations; real property`transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. All discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing:from this meeting may.'be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend.:this session, but must not disclose any information discussed-during this session,. kathy\iwh\7-23.agn k i• • INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD MEETING MINUTES MA Y 14, 1997 Members present: Beverly Froude, Jan Drangsholt, Paul Hunt, Patrick Carroll, Bill Scheiderich Staff present: Ed Wegner, Mike Miller, John Early, Kathy Kaatz Visitors present: Jack Polans 1. Call,to Order The regular,scheduled, meeting of the Intergovernmental Water Board was called, to order at.5:35 p.m. 2. Roll Call and Introductions Roll was taken and all members were present. John.Early was introduced as the new Utility Manager,(Randy Volk's replacement) effective May 12. John came to • the City of Tigard from Georgetown, Texas. John has been living in the Beaverton area;since February. 3. Election of Officers Gomrnissioner Hunt motioned to re-elect Bill Scheiderich as Chairperson which was seconded by Commissioner Carroll. Commissioner Hunt motioned for .Beverly Froude as Vice Chairperson which was seconded by Commissioner Carroll and voted upon unanimously. 4. Visitor Comments Jack Polaris was present and requested that the Visitor Comments section of the agenda be moved.to the end of the agenda. Moving this agenda item would allow the visitor to comment and ask questions after Board and Staff members have spoken. Chair Scheiderich agreed to move this item to the end of the agenda to accommodate Mr. Polaris's request. S. Approval of Minutes Commissioner Hunt motioned to approve the minutes of the March 12, 1997 meeting.nunutes as presented. This was seconded by Commissioner Froude and passed unanimously_ 6. Consortium Update Commissioner Hunt stated the consortium held their last meeting at Clackamas. .There was no vice chair elected at that meeting since there was not a quorum and the newly elected chairperson is not interested in the position. The consortium group will be looking at the budget at their June 11 meeting. 7. Menlor Reservoir Update Mr. Wegner stated that the Menlor property was purchased in 19.89 and we are now ready to build the reservoir. Currently asking,City Council to approve the request for bids'for. coastruction on May 27. HopefUlly we will award the contract by July 15, with substantial completion by July 30, .199.8 with finishing work to be completed on landscape and fencing. Currently we are.negotiating construction easement on.Clute property and proposing removal of the existing garage. Since property owner has become ill, she has proposed to sell entire property (1.74 acres). 'If approval to purchase whole site, the residence will be left.vacant during construction and will sell after completion. In response to Commissioner Hunt's question, there will be a hard surface road which,will be maintained permanently. Mr. Wegner stated that Murray, Smith and Associates"will attend the next meeting to discuss construction. This project will probably extend to.approximately eighteen°months.. Mr. Wegner stated that Mike Miller is currently working with a property owner for°an additional site located at;a,higher elevation (510 level). 8. Water-Operations Budget 1997/98 Mr. Wegner stated that included in the Board packet was the highlights of the 1997/98 budget proposal. This proposed budget will be presented to the Budget Committee on May 23 and discussion will be held on any necessary changes which will be presented to City Council for adoption in June. Following are some of the highlights discussed: Water Operation's Supervisor's proposal to take traditional four summer temps and replace with one FTE year around, CIP program to replace 1-1/2 + with new meters (costs to cover installation). Tests have shown a 39% increase with new meters, these meters are read automatically with a remote read touchpad. These meters are primarily commercial and multi-family services. In response to Commissioner Carroll's question, new construction will comply r with installation of these new meters. Also proposed within this budget are the funds to purchase a new meter reading vehicle. Will work out meter reading/utility ® billing concerns and issues first. Commissioner Scheiderich questioned whether we,have considered contracting meter reading out of house? Mr. Wegner stated • that'Public works have considered that although the Finance Department is hesitant. Further discussion on the issue of contracting these services out outlined the possibility of placing more employees in the field. 'Commissioner Hunt stated that Mr. Wegner has done a good job in negotiating various contracts and he would like to have furnished at the next meeting, consumption and cost from one year ago in comparison with this year. Mr. Wegner stated that we were able to reduce the project budget due to participation on various regional groups. There was discussion held that no formal recommendation is necessary that the budget document will be presented to City Council and Budget Committee and at this time appears that it will pass as submitted. Commissioner Scheiderich questioned the effect of Measure 50 and the budget? Mr. Wegner stated that all departments within the organization were required to make a 10% reduction in the 600 accounts (Materials,and Services). 9. Director's Report. Mr.,Wegner stated that included in the packet;is a copy of the capital improvements projects for the next.seven years. Mike Miller stated that one of next years,-projects to construct the 3.5 milliongallon.reservoir at the Menlor Site as well as the installation of'a small pipeline on 135th. Mr. Miller stated that in looking at the overall system, some improvements are in the-unincorporated area and some are contingent upon County projects with MSTIP III. MSTIP III for Beef Bend, King Arthur to 135th, have been pulled and completion is unknown at this time. Mr. Wegner continued by discussing that we are currently transitioning from purchasing the. majority of water. from Lake_ :Oswego to Portland (as much as doubling) this July. One concern has been the quality of water and ensuring compliance with EPA rules and regulations'and the inclusion in Portland's testing and various programs. Mike Miller discussed the lead/copper rules through EPA and adopted by the State requires us to control lead/copper levels inside the homeowners plumbing. Mr. Miller continued by stating that there is not a problem within the distribution system with lead/copper levels, actually we are below level limits. The homes that may have concerns are ones that have lead soldier, copper pipes and brass fittings (homes built between 1983-85).. Compliance;date on dead/copper mandate is July 1, 1999. Mr. Miller continued by saying that Portland's water make up is different than Lake Oswego's and since we,are purchasing more water from Portland they are allowing us to participate i n their ' Lead/Copper Control Program. Portland is basically following the EPA program called XL; Instead of following stringent guidelines, this program allows Portland to bring the water via treatment to a pH level of 7.4. Mr. Wegner continued by stating that also including in the Board's packet was the executive summary on the Willamette River Raw Water Monitoring Program which was.a follow-up to the Tualatin Valley Water District pilot program in testing for drinking water at Wilsonville (2 year study). The results of this study have shown that the Willamette is a viable source for drinking water, if treated. Mr. Wegner stated that.the complete document is available in his office. This will conclude the study that Tualatin Valley Water District completed and they will meet next week to,see what the next stage will be. Mr. Wegner also.stated that we are involved with a subregional group on studies dealing with water rights. Tigard applied two years ago for water rights in the Wilsonville area(Wilsonville, TVWD, Newberg, Clackamas, Canby). At this time, Tigard is involved in forming an entity that would allow entities with junior rights to buy;into someone elses rights and place the junior rights aside for a later date when actually needed. Once a draft is developed, it will be brought back:before the Board for discussion. Also being discussed is the Washington County Supply Line (Tigard, TVWD, Tualatin, Sherwood and Wilsonville) which comes down through Beaverton;Tualatin Valley area to 72nd Street and into Tualatin. Tigard is looking jointly with other agencies if they need their water and if there is still water- available for Tigard. The source of this water is Powell Butte through Portland Water. During the winter months average demand was 4.1 or 4.2. Mr. Wegner continued • by saying that,the demand has continued to increase since May 1 up to the current demand of 7.3. Discussed the education process with irrigation techniques. The Conservation Coalition that Mike Miller is currently involved with will be taking on the issue of landscaping ordinances-with design and/or control of these concerns. We need to educate on using water wisely! Discussed that Cook Park is currently working on,irrigating with effluent system and both both Summerfield and King City golf courses already use USA effulent'-. 10. Facility Use Recommendation(TWD) Commissioner Froude stated that the Tigard Water District Board members discussed the facility needs issue and at this time it appears that this is not an issue since the City has purchased a modular building to eliviate some of the space needs. Ms. Foude stated that the TWD Board voted and asked that when changes come up and the uses of the Water facility are known that this facility become a Public Works building entirely. This would vacate the current Public Works building for other uses. Mr. Wegner stated at this time this would be very premature since we do not know what the future needs will be. Commissioner Hunt stated that.City Council and the IWB would need to take a look at what the facility needs are and how the space can be utilized the most efficiently. • y 11. Non Agenda.Items • There were no non-agenda items for discussion. Chairperson Scheiderich stated g p that Mr. Polaris could now speak. Mr. Polaris stated that he had three items for discussion: 1) Memo dated April 29 on Lead/Copper discussion and the Federal guidelines requirement to comply by July 1, 1999. Mr. Miller stated.that is the actual date for compliance. 2) City of Tigard agenda item in'estimation of the cost of developing in unincorporated area and future annexation situations. Mr. Polans stated he would talk to Mr. Monahan at a later date. 3) Status of the IGA with Willamette, Sherwood, Canby and other entities? Chair Scheiderich stated that we' do not have any further information at this time. Mr. Wegner stated that this was discussed earlier since this is a part of consortium group. 12. Adjournment The regular meeting of the Intergovernmental Water Board was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.. kathy\iwb5=14 MEMORANDUM T 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO.: Ed Wegner FROM: Mike Miller DATE: July 15, 1997 SUBJECT: Water Color and Quality A water color incident occurred Sunday,'July 13, 1997, in our distribution system. During the summer demand season we fill the 10 MG reservoir on the weekend directly from Portland. • We isolate the 24-inch transmission/distribution main so that we can flow water from Portland (Bull Run Supply System) directly to the 10 MG reservoir. By diverting Water directly to the 10 MG reservoir we can flow water. at 5,600 gpm as compared to purimpng water from our main reservoir zone at 2,000 gpm, thus saving time a,nd energy costs.. However, Sunday morning we had a failure with a 24-inch butterfly valve. The valve operator box/gear box, malfunctioned and we could not open the valve. Since the weather forecast for the week was for warm weather, the 10 MG reservoir was less than 69% full, and we can purchase as much Portland water as we want without penalty, I requested that the Water Duty person increase our flow from Portland to 4,000 gpm into our distribution system. This increase was necessary to not only maintain current levels in our main reservoir zone, but to cover for the additional burden that pumping to the. 10 MG reservoir can cause. I cannot stress enough the importance of refilling the 10 MG reservoir during summer supply operations. If we have an extended hot spell and the.10 MG reservoir does not start the week full, we run the risk of "peaking" off Portland which in turn can,cause our rates from Portland to increase the next fiscal year. One question you may ask is why didn't we just increase our purchases from Lake .Oswego to cover the additional demand? The.problem with purchasing the additional water from Lake Oswego and then pumping the free chlorinated water into the 10 MG reservoir is related to maintaining a chlorine residual on Bull Mountain. When free chlorinated water is mixed with chloraminated water (Bull Run), we experienced low chlorine residuals. Also, whenwe met with Mark Knudson, Portland Water Bureau, he highly recommended that we avoid mixing the two water supplies. Mark's concern was with nitrification of our water and . . the formation of tri-chloramines: Nitrification and tri-chloramines cause serious taste and • odor problems, which,.is why we have been filling the 10 MG reservoir exclusively with Bull Run water. When we increased the flow from Portland (we have been operating at 2,780 gpm since July 1, 1997) to 4,000 gpm, the higher water velocities in the 12-inch water main on SW North Dakota stirred-up some sedimentation. Sedimentation is a natural occurrence in .water mains due to low to normal operation. This disturbance occurred around 12:30 PM Sunday shortly after we started flowing more Portland water into the distribution system. At no time was there any foreign material introduced into the system and in no way did the disturbance indicate that the quality of our drinking water failed to meet Safe Drinking Water Act standards. It was not until 330 PM, that. I was notified by the Water Duty person that he had. received thirteen "dirty" water calls. When the first calls started coming in, the Water Duty person responded to them as isolated problems that could be attributed to unauthorized usage of a fire hydrant. After a few more calls, ;and realizing that the calls were not in just one localized,area, the.Water Duty person became concerned that we had a water main failure in our system. The complaints- were located on SW Anton Drive, SW Shore Drive, SW Chimney Ridge, SW Morning Hill, .and .SW 131 st Avenue and Katherine Street. When the Water Duty person advised me of the locations, I determined that the calls were a result of • increasing the flow from Portland. I then instructed the Water Duty person to reset the flow from Portland to 2,780 gpm. Since the Water Duty person was still receiving calls for "dirty," water, I told them-that they could notify the answering service of the situation and that they, the answering service, could reply as follows: "the Water Division is aware of the problem. Due to a increase in water demands, water flows into thesystem also increased, resulting:in a-disturbance in the water system. It will take a few hours for the coloration to settle out and that the water is safe. We apologize for any inconvenience that•this may have caused". The Water Duty person did check with the answering service on several .occasioris though out the evening. The Water Duty person reported that the answering service only received five to seven additional calls after 3:-30 PM Sunday. By early evening the disturbance dissipated and the calls had stopped. Although summer demands and the malfunctioning valve played a key role in causing the necessity of increasing water.flows from Portland. It was the 8.42 MG water demand that helped to quickly dissipate the "dirty" water. This morning I received only one call from a resident complaining about a load of laundry that did not come clean'in the wash. I referred that individual to Risk Management. • Since DEQ has revised its regulations on discharges of chlorinated water earlier this year; we have reestablished, our dead end line flushing program. Although this program is designed to only purge water from dead ended water mains, later this fall we are planning to.expand the program to,include a systematic approach to flushing.our distribution mains. Ideally, we should only flush the distribution system in the .late fall and winter months 'because of the large volumes of water that are needed to clean the pipes. With the water conservation messages that we distribute and support regionally, flushing of the distribution system during the high demand season would produce a negative public opinion regarding water conservation. Whereas flushing of the dead end mains uses very little water in comparison. With John Early's commitment to the flushing program and the additional staff that we are currently recruiting, I firmly believe that we will avoid this type of.problem in the future. • jT Aeneet 3 `2-00 21,M''seeks�mput on Portland e � lead out SWTRech �logies��z 3 ale EPA pondersplan EPA wiN.hold}apubl�c meeting Jul3to Lead levels in the water of Oregon's alternative strategy ... tailored to local gatheistakeholtlerinput�on g g meengltheSbWAmandate largest city have dropped significantly conditions [that] can deliver greater envi- to listsmal[ systemfcompu since the Portland Water Bureau last Jan- ronmental quality than uniform- `com- � � � S, ancetechnalagtesfor thee° wary began adding sodium hydroxide to mand and-confrol'approaches:" Surface Water Treatment Rule byFAugust a raise the pH level of the Bull Run supply. Portland's plan, the first Project XL ;u�Tuplst"doesnotlneedeto `eWl asedrU amu, affortlabtflt}I ertte�§a butwEPA will x196 M e a n w h i I e, proposal that deals directly with drinking beg[nseeking comment onapproaehes�� EPA is consid water treatment regulations, would sub- 'We Bring the city's stitute optimal corrosion control treat- MWOC,developing national Ieve'lTaffordability A amu a - �.. `, < CtiteCkaforfutUre rules y innovative plan ment and public education requirements skin a�June 25 Federal Regfsternotfce of that would alleviate the need for more of the Lead and Copper Rule with a four- le I I a �� thpl..'" ing;EPA notes that the,intfial list aggressive chemical treatment and tiered program. ofSWTR teehtit)iog esfOr theee 'em-hp, expensive pipe replacement. The four elements include the Stie ategories {salving tU,U0Q33Q1�, The corrosion control program, existing treatment scheme for corrosion 3,33U �1, and 5EM?25) wil[ besimtiarto, hick raised the water's pH from a control, expanded free water testing pro- . xaa �,. z` t CU�r6nt dtsinfecbon,1, d fitratton technolo '1Z engiesforSWTR coniphance,EPA,though, slightly acidic 6.8 to a slightly alkaline grams to determine elevated lead levels in says atuvatrtscanmentsanwhe#herpoint3 7.3, brought' lead Levels down to 1.2 homes; a.home lead hazard reduction tlf�ettryUntts tart be used and any spec - ug/L and copper levels to 0,..65 mg/L, program to prevent children from being ciflc$criteria that eanbe appited togsmall@ with the addition of just '3 mg/L of exposed_to hazards associated with lead_ ' system W1Rtechnologi6t NaOH, said Mark.Knudson, PWB water based paint and exposure-prevention edu- �" EPA&also notesthat if the nattanaf x � quality manager. cation targeted to those at greatest risk-to ieveiaaffordabtltty crr#erla are set uery In.the initial round of lead,and copper lead exposure. ���tigh, vartanaes wtlibeitintfed oreltmi f - natetl altd systems wilitbe farce{!in#ogthe monitoring in`1992, Portland recorded a Results of these components would compliancespathway;"and¢lf the critbdA 90th percentile lead level of 41 pg/L and be evaluated through tracking data, sam- r 'R are setWry[ow,the opposite ill happen`- copper levels of 1.6 mg/L. Because the pling, monitoring, surveys and noting t e a � �j .r� n.X For more information, ca[l ythe Safe EPA action level for lead is.15 pg/L and behavior•in targeted groups. �DrinkingWater Hotline at($00)4264791pp g �j pNrB PWB officials say their LHR program ���� the copper target level is 1.3 m (. TaCa CamBron-111#s{ZtI2)26U 3 02 at, cfaced compromising the high quality of will achieve better protection of public kA R ` � � its unfiltered surface water source by health at equal or lower cost than strict enc es announce Strategy � �" � � � boosting chemical treatment enough to adherence to the'lead rule,with an antici- ,for4assessiing�wetiM functions F�fedift, enctes have }oitttly, reaeh,a recommended pH of 93. gated capital cost savings of up to$2 mil- C announced aiewstrategy foiassesstng Fortunately; pilot tests;showed that a lion and an''additional $200,000 savings �1Net1aIldS functtons for Glean WaterAet k - lower level pH was just as effective, and .. in annual operating costs. seetinn40�4petmitpurposesDeueli)ped the recent monitoring results.support The ro osal was first a _ g pP proposal approved by sby���Vteam that tnClUdedrepreesof that conclusion.,."We're. real 'enthused the Portland City Council in September the R- of Engii ears,the hNatu ai 7 �Resourees C- 'ervatlon Service,the Fed about those:results. It's working, and it 1995, and several partners have since � � shows we made a wise choice," said signed on, including the Oregon Health eralHtghway Atlmints tratton;theErmron `YmentalProtee#ton Agency yank theFtsh Knudson. `In fact, the real world results Division; the Multnomah, Washington, artdW�IdlifeAServtte,the strategyrelies ons were more favorable than the pilot study and Clackamas County health depart- develnl?►nentafire9tat3al9U!tie600lcs� � indicated." m mes; the Oregon Childhood,Lead Poi - ��AdESCribed�inaJtine2Det/erat Portland must conduct another coning Prevention Program and the fr�Reg�ster�nottce,the nattona[planats basetl round of testing in the fall to determine water systems that purchase water from tm a hydrogeamorptic3approach dint on s sld0 s3$water,sources, landscape post if the results remain constant,given sea Portland, ttonir grand vuater,flowse and f1Uc#U8t § sonal temperature changes and other EPA is reviewing the input from the Regiortll gUidebooks�wtl;i ldapJ the , factors. affected federal departments and is {apps aCh to consider spectaleW,i?Charadtens � , working with Portland to obtain more tics�ofsome�25 30 SubClassEs of regM. tOnai LHR program information on health effects as it per- �w�etlantls Elie zrieFw�methodology�isa In March Portland submitted a Lead tains`to the LHR proposal. �expBCted1to increase the accuracy o,sUeh Hazard Reduction plan to EPA under the We think our proposal is entirely saessments, aliow"I 't F redueee,1683i.me requ�retl t0 c©nduetthem� � agency s Project XL, a multimedia pro- consistent with the Project XL's-multi- FO -more infix oration call Colleen gram that is intended to streamline com media approach," said Knudson. "We're Charles at the Corps ofjEn tree &Mt¢ pliance by giving "the regulated commu encouraged by EPA's careful evaluation of 761 0199orE Check F#helntemetat nity the flexibility to replace the require- the program. It shows they get the idea of /rwetiand usace mil F� �� " ments of the current system ... with an common-sense rulemaking. I MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO:, Bill Monahan, Jim Hendryx 'FROM: Ed Wegner DATE: July 15, 1997 SUBJECT: Regional Framework Plan,Draft Comments The attached draft letter was approved by the Consortium Technical Sub-Committee, which I am a member of, authorizing.day to day work on Consortium matters. This letter when finalized will be signed by the ten member committee. The committee.members feel very strongly that Metro was to have utilized more of the Regional Water ,Supply Plan than,they did - and the Committee has-concerns about their utilization. Considering all the money that water providers have spent over the last five years on studying water supply issues, these changes,are a concern to the Committee. Metro has been a active participant in the Regional Water Supply Plan. This is just to keep youinformed as to concerns the water providers in the region have as to the Regional Framework Plan Draft which involves Tigard and it's water partners: c:_ Intergovernmental Water Board kathy/reg" cTsC DRAFT July 2, 1-997 Ms. Rosemary Furfey Metro 600 NE Grand Portland, Oregon 972.32 Dear Rosemary: After having read through the Regional Framework Plan Draft of May 1997 the Regional Water Providers Consortium Technical Committee would like to offer the following comments on Chapter 4 - Water. Basically Part 1 of Chapter 4 on urban water supply is a good summary of the activities of Metro and the region's water providers over the last several years. The`basic.:tenants presented in this chapter are supported by the endorsed Regional Water Supply Plan. The following are a few specific comments related to the draft language in this chapter: Page 11.5 - in.the last paragraph the RPAG group is mentioned, this group started to meet in late 1989 and early 1990. Page 1 L6 - The first paragraph refers to the Phase 1,studies,,yet the citation only includes one of the three studies and misses the date.of;the one cited, the correct citations are: ' Water Source Options Study, 1992 Water System Der-and Study, 1992 City of Portland Conservation Study, 1992 In the second paragraph we would,prefer that you.add "regionally, significant" between'the words "six source" in.the first sentence.,Also the number of'" participants was 26 before Metro joined making the:total.27.' Page 118 In the first paragraph only one of;the Phase I studies is referenced and all three,of the above mentioned studies:comp-rised Phase I and they.were completed in 1992. ln..the third.paragraph there is reference:to ;the mid-level annual demand increases, it would also be useful to note the increase in the high demand forecast as well. In addition a.sentence could added such as "The Region's water providers also included low and high range water demand forecasts in their water supply planning process." Page 119 - Metro might waist to consider adding a bullet that says, "Identify a strategy for coordination with the.water providers and the Regional Water Providers Consortium,to foster the meeting of Regional Water Supply Plan and Regional Framework Plan objectives. Page 1,20 - In the first list of bullets the following changes would make more sense based on.the already completed work involved with. the RWSP: Bullet 1 "continue to refine the future resource needs of the,region for municipal and industrial water supply as the Regional Water.Supply Plan is updated." Bullet 3 - Use the word "implement" in place of"identify." Page 121 - We certainly agree with the policy directions stated on pages 121- 123 since they are out of the RWSP. We would like to encourage you to make reference of the fact that these policy objectives are verbatim from the RWSP and that they will be applied in any further revisions to that plan. In addition it would be advisable to note that these policies will require continuing weighing and balancing among these complementary, sometimes conflicting, objectives. Page 122 - The second policy statement under Impacts of Catastrophic Events belongs in the one below on Water Quality, at least this is how they are presented in the RWSP. Also the.,third policy statement under Economic.Costs and Cost Equity belongs in the one below on Environmental Stewardship. Page 123 - The second policy statement in Growth and Land Use Planning came from a different policy objective in the RWSP titled Operational Flexibility, we are not sure if this was intentional or not. We further note that the Framework Plan policies do not contain headings for Operational Flexibility or Ease of Implementation and that the policy statements contained in these headings, with the exception of the one noted above that is placed in Growth and Land.Use Planning in the Framework Plan draft, that the rest of the statements are not included_ . Again we are not sure if this was intentional or not, if it was-we would like to know`why these ones were specifically excluded. Page 240 Appendix E - It is in this section that we.find the most disturbing • language, which appears to not be referenced in any manner in the Water Chapter. We are not sure why the Metro Council would want to consider requirements related to conservation, since these strategies are well covered in the RWSP, and.are the subject of early implementation in the Consortium's first year work program, In addition, regulations concerning the sequencing of regionally significant-new supply and transmission lines is also of concern. Why, after the many years and.large resource expenditure developing the RWSP and forming the Consortium, would the Metro Council want to consider regulations that could be different from those in the RWSP which the Council has already,endorsed? This is, particularly of concern when the plan was conducted in an integrated fashion which looked at conservation, supplies; and transmission as packages.`Theonly rationale behind a different Metro track would be if there were some-linkage to the implementation of the other Metro growth management goals. We have established a collaborative process with the Consortium and Metro is a member of that group. Unless there is some significant reason given for why the Metro Council would want to.supersede this process to require different strategies than those contained in the RWSP there would seem to be no reason for such language, particularly since there is no,-mention of such requirements discussed in the main part of the Framework Plan. We would like to suggest that you consider language more along the lines of cooperation with the.Regional Water" Providers Consortium to ensure that strategies related to conservation,source options, and transmission are implemented in a timely manner so as to ensure proper timing and conformance with the Metro growth management policies as contained in the RUGGO's, the early • Implementation program, and the Framework Plan. 'If you would like to discuss any of these comments please feel free to call file at 923-7502. • Sincerely You"rs, Lorna Stickel Chief Planner cc Consortium Technical Committee Council Susan McLain, member of the Consortium Board } Yom_ l _-® Spnnt Sprint PCS- and Engineering 1 PrupertciP,lydand MTA June 30. 1997 VIA PERSONAL DELIVERY Ti,ard Water District Ciry of Tigard Attn. William Monahan 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard. Oregon 97223 R-E: 047C Tigard Site located at 377' SW Burnham Street,Tigard, Oregon. PCS Site Agreement executed on behalf of Tigard Water District on May 13, 1996 and on behalf of Sprint Spectrum L.P.("SSLP`)on klay 221, 1996 Dear:.Mr.;klonahan: Pursuantao Section 5 of a PCS Site Agreement(described above), SSLP hereby,, requests your consent to-allow SSLP to sublease the.PCS Site Agreement'to'U,S West,Communications Wireless Group ("US VtWES..T") for the purpose of allowing US WEST to install. operate and maintain a telecommunications facility at.the Site, in addition to SSLP's use. .Section 5 of that PCS Site :agreement provides that such consent-shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. We request your consent to such sublease for the term of the PCS Site Agreement and any, renewal thereof. .All terms of the PCS Site Aa zreement will remain unchan,ed. - Please execute the bottom of this letter to indicate vour asreement and consent to such sublease. .-ktter executin= this letter, please return one copy as soon as possible in the enclosed self addressed stamped envelope. .A second copy is provided for your records and convenience. If you have any questions..please contact me at X03=612-1003. Sincerely, William Castanares. Esq. Property Specialist cc: Don deBlanc. Property Manager Brenda Slavin . Property Specialist This consent to sublease is hereby given pursuant to Section S of the PCS Site Agreement. `,me: William Monahan Dated • Title: Tigard City .administrator Sheet2 Total Water Purchases/Production and Costs During FY 1995-96 Month LO. Total in PDX Total in TVWD Total Well#1 in Well#2 in Well#3 in Total MG Grand Total MG MG in MG MG MG MG Pur./Prod. Cost Cost/ccf 0.57 1.244 0.781 Jul. 95 177.83 42.68 14.76 2.9 18.88 0 257.05 Aug. 95 141.83 8.13 54.25 17.59 18.42 0 240.22 Sept. 95 111.38 4.67 46.38 17.41 17.55 0 197.39 Oct. 95 104.16 0 1.51 17.98 17.89 0 141.54 Nov. 95 90.22 0 1.6 17.32 16.94 0 126.08 Dec. 95 106.61 0 1.61 17.84 17.17 0 143.23 Jan. 96 92.34 0 1.71 17.46 17.33 0 128.84 Feb. 96 98.53 0 6.22 16.66 17.17 0138.58 Mar. 96 94.11 0.0037 1.47 17.79 16.84 0 130.2137 Apr. 96 109.29 0.26 1.56 17.23 15.93 0 144.27 May. 96 109.1 0 1.72 16.82 16.16 0 143.8 Jun. 96 158.22 27.19 2.9 3.45 ----3-.-27 -0 195.03 Total Pur.in MG 1393.62 82.9337 135.69 180.45 193.55 0 1986.244 Total Cost $1,061,972.70 $141,403.39 $141,674.18 $1,345,050.27 Total Water Purchases/Production and Costs During FY 1996-97 Month LO. Total in PDX Total in TVWD Total Well#1 in Well#2 in Well#3 in Total MG Grand Total MG MG in MG MG MG MG Pur./Prod. Cost Cost/ccf 0.63 0.87 0.823 Jul. 96 160.02 77.99 67.34 17.63 12.59 -4.06-3-39.63 Aug. 96 126.3 69.91 68.02 17.25 15.89 0 297.37 Sept. 96 62.79 58.63 33.47 16.53 14.88 3.78 190.08 Oct. 96 46.62 61.8 23.7 8.44 7.5 4.59 152.65 Nov. 96 34.63 63.94 31.06 0 0 4.44 134.07 Dec. 96 36.26 61.3 39.14 0 0 3.77 140.47 Jan. 97 34.36 67.58 12.92 0 0 0 114.86 Feb. 97 32.58 56.3 49.01 0 0 0 137.89 Mar. 97 33.68 51.87 32.58 0 00 118.13 Apr. 97 40.79 70.46 32.51 0 0 0 143.76 May. 97 77.04 77.78 43.75 0 0 0 198.57 Jun. 97 28.14 88.02 53.46 12.07 11.77 0 193.46 Total Pur. in MG 713.21 805.58 486.96 71.92 62.63 20.64 2160.94 Total Cost $576,083.10 $945,960.55 $535,777.94 $2,057,821.59 i Page 1 Comparison Chart 10 Comparison of Water Purchased/Produced vs Cost $2 500 000.00 00 >::.::: 22 M, 4 9tk:1111G ... A~ _ 1. 2150 $2,000,000.00 ... ........ . } 1,�.- .. M 2100 C $1,500,000.00 = t — . .: s .. 0 y . 2050 U' R o - o y Water Cost O p�� c t: S ,#;; o —0 Water in MG .. V :i i' -' ..... ..: : .. O N U - 2000 ,c $1,000,000.00 .. i..is?i. ::::: . .. ... .. ..:... >: .. .. w .:::::::: .::. .. R : . :.. : i.:..: :: ... :: 3 . 1950 ".::::: $500,000.00 >rr:<: 1900 $0.00 .. ......::. 1850 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 Fiscal Year Page 1