Loading...
07/15/2003 - Packet FILE COPY 5261 Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Serving Tigard, King City, Durham and Unincorporated Area AGENDA Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order Moll Call and Introductions Motion to call meeting to order, staff to take roll call. 2. Approval of Minutes—April 15,2003,and June 11,2003 Motion from Board for minute approval. 3. IWB Meeting Schedule Review 4. PW Director's Report— Ed Wegner(30 minutes) S. Informational Items—Ed Wegner Items will be discussed briefly if time allows—otherwise printed info will be distributed. 6. Public Comments Call for any comments from public. 7. Non Agenda Items Call for non-agenda items from Board. 8. Next meeting date— Wednesday,August 13, 2003 at 5:30 p.m. in the Water Auditorium 9. Adjournment—Approximate Time 7.00 p.m. Motion for adjournment. A light dinner will be provided. Executive Session: The Intergovernmental Water Board may go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660(1)(d), (e), (fl&(h)to discuss labor relations,real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues and to consider records that are exempt by law from public inspection. All discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting maybe disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Minutes April 15, 2003 Members Present: Jan Drangsholt, Patrick Carroll, Brian Moore, Norm Penner, (Bill Scheiderich asked to be excused) Staff Present. Ed Wegner, Dennis Koellermeier, Sally Mills, Tom Imdieke, and Twila Willson Visitors: Dick Winn, John Hector, and Damien Merrick 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions Commissioner Patrick Carroll called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes—February 18, 2003 Transcription of the minutes was incomplete and this will be moved to the next meeting for review and approval. 3. Requests for Credit from Leaks— Tom lmdieke The order of review of the credit for leaks was changed. Tigard Community Friends Church found a leak from the foundation, which they called a swimming pool. The credit under the existing credit relief policy amounted to$3,953.80. Their total bill from the leak was $7,682.49, which shows that the leak was substantial. The meter reader discovered the leak on March 3'd and the repair was made on March 5th The church is not asking for more than the usual credit. Code requires board approval for a reimbursement of this size. The board discussed the issue of whose accountability this was. Commissioner Brian Moore stated that it was not the responsibility of the Water District to go from house to house, building to building making sure the water system was in good operating order. Mr. Imdieke stated that research has found that some other water districts or water providers do not have a credit for leak policy at all. Staff has been discussing the possibility of coming back to the IWB and revising the Tigard credit for leak policy. There has recently been quite an increase in requests for credit from leaks. The current credit policy was taken from the old Tigard Water District policy. Commissioner Jan Drangsholt moved to approve the credit of$3,953.80 for the Tigard Community Friends Church and Commissioner Moore seconded the motion. The vote for approval was unanimous. Intergovernmental Water Board i April 15,2003 DRAFT COPY The board requested staff to research the credit for leak policy with the policies of other jurisdictions and how they handle these types of issues. Damien Merrick requested a credit for leak from a leaking toilet. The leak was discovered in January when a roommate heard running water and their water bill was very high. Tom Imdieke explained that the existing credit leak policy would provide a credit of$315.72 from a total bill of$659.80. A letter was submitted requesting consideration of a larger credit and explaining that they were college students and experiencing financial difficulties. Mr. Merrick explained further about the financial conditions he and his roommates were experiencing and that their landlord had repaired the running toilet. Commissioner Jan Drangsholt suggested they approach the landlord to help recover a portion of the bill, however, Mr. Merrick said the rental agency said their only recourse was with the water district. Commissioner Moore advised the Finance Department to arrange for installment plan options for payment of the outstanding billed amount. No action was taken to grant further credit, however, it was suggested that they try again with their landlord. 4. Assistant PW Director's Utility Report—Dennis Koellermeier Fluoride Issue— Mr. Koellermeier reported that information about the fluoride issue was previously distributed and a presentation had since been made to the City Council who referred the issue back to the IWB. Discussions with Beaverton indicate that their design of the system is continuing and the fluoridation process will begin around January. They will be performing another set of tests to study the impacts of fluoride on their ASR system, which may be the drawback for fluoridation. The board members and staff discussed the ASR and winter water purchases and costs from the JWC and the City of Portland. The board discussed the fluoride issue further with some of the following points of interest: • It would be too expensive, although feasible, to remove fluoride from the water system • Fluoride was not a bad thing • Should the fluoride issue be made as a board or by a vote of the people? • Staff has received no calls about fluoride • Could bring JWC water to Tigard by another pipeline and go around Beaverton • Fluoride would be diluted when mixed with other water supplies • Fluoride occurs naturally in many water systems • AWWA and Center for Disease Control and Prevention list 0.7 as the optimum level for fluoride • Parents with younger children in favor or fluoride • Dentists and doctors in favor and recommend to their patients • Tigard Times article generated no positive or negative calls to staff The IWB thought it was not necessary to take this issue to their various councils. It was concluded that a letter should be created stating the board's position regarding fluoride. Tigard Water_District Update—The TWD has had difficulty filling vacant seats and only one person has fled and is listed on the upcoming ballot where all five seats need to be filled. Legal options regarding dissolution will be presented to the TWD at their next meeting on April 28th. The results of the election may cause the TWD to cease to exist, which will also affect the IWB and restructuring will be necessary. Intergovernmental Water Board 2 April 15,2003 DRAFT COPY 5. Informational Items— Ed Wegner Ed Wegner distributed the informational items, which included such items as: • Portland water rate increases and correspondence in response to the proposed increases • media articles on the termination of the proposed Bull Run Drinking Water Agency During the combined IWB/City Council meeting, Mr.Wegner will be suggesting that joint meetings be held on a quarterly basis following the JWC meeting & Public Comments-None 7. Non Agenda Items The next meeting Wednesday, May 14, 2003, and is back to the regular meeting date schedule. & Adjournment Commissioner Drangsholt motioned to adjourn the meeting; Commissioner Penner seconded the motion, and all board members voted in favor of adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 6:28 p.m. Intergovernmental Water Board 3 April 15,2003 DRAFT COPY Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Minutes June 11, 2003 Members Present: Patrick Carroll, Brian Moore, Norm Penner, Bill Scheiderich Staff Present: Ed Wegner, Dennis Koellermeier, Richard Sattler, and Jaime Dumdi Visitors: Mike Stone, Jeff Bauman, Roel Lundquist, Paul Owen, Henrietta Cochran 1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions Commissioner Bill Scheiderich called the meeting to order. Ed Wegner called roll and introduced Jaime Dumdi, who would be taking minutes and recording the meeting while Twila Willson was on vacation. He also reported that Kathy Kaatz had recently resigned. 2. Approval of Minutes—February 18, 2003 Commissioner Brian Moore motioned to accept the minutes and Commissioner Norm Penner seconded the motion. The vote to accept the minutes of the February 18, 2003, meeting was unanirhous. 3. City of Wilsonville Treatment Plant Update—Jeff Bauman/Mike Stone Ed Wegner introduced Jeff Bauman, Public Works Director of Wilsonville, and Mike Stone, Wilsonville's City Engineer and the Project Manager for the Treatment Plant (also a resident of Tigard). Mike Stone presented information regarding construction of the Wilsonville Treatment Plant, which included the following items: • Wilsonville struggled for a solution to their long-term water supply • Groundwater sources previously were their water supply and the Water Resources Department said they could not have any more wells • They entered into an agreement with the design/build contractor, Montgomery Watson Harza • Groundbreaking for the plant was July 17, 2000 • Plant came online April 29, 2002 • 8 permits from state and federal agencies were acquired in 8 months, which was a remarkable achievement • Outside operating firm was involved during the design/build phase • Transition from the groundwater supply source to the treatment plant completed literally by flipping switches • Very few design/operational issues • Grand opening is on June 28, 2003 — Invited to attend that party. • Plant has capacity for 15 mgd Intergovernmental Water Board 1 June 11,2003 DRAFT COPY • Currently running 2 -4.5 mgd • Plant is fully expandable up to 120 mgd • Tualatin Valley Water District is their partner and they paid for the over-sizing costs • Transmission from the plant is 50 mgd capability Jeff Bauman distributed handouts. He explained that construction and operation of the plant has been very controversial and they have included precautions in the operational plans of the plant. • An RFP process to obtain a private company to operate the plant • The contract with U.S. Filter calls for stricter standards than the federal government's requirements for drinking water • There is an option to terminate the contract at any time for any reason • Monitoring practices exceed requirements— no organic particles have been detected in the water since coming on line • Notification process set up with the State in the event of a spill in the river • Ozone monitoring is part of the treatment process • Every step of the process is fully redundant including a back-up generator for power supply • Adjustments to operational standards were made after September 11th and now call for someone to be on site at all times for security purposes • There have been no operational problems to date • The cost for ccf is the most expensive in the region • Operational expenses are $1.3 million per year for a billion gallons of water • The aquifer recovery to the wells has increased • Local reaction to the water has been good from Wilsonville businesses and residents and negativity is strictly from parties outside of Wilsonville Commissioner Penner wanted to point out that with the higher requirement standards that Wilsonville demands from the plant, perhaps Wilsonville's water is purer than Portland's drinking water. The board discussed making the WilsonvilleMillamette River Treatment Plant a topic for publication in Tigard's Cityscape. Commissioner Scheiderich also made it clear that the Willamette River should remain an option to explore and investigate and this information should be shared to educate citizens. 4. Assistant PW Director's Utility Report—Dennis Koellermeier Dennis Koellermeier reported that the first heat wave of the summer brought water usage to just over 11 mgd for three consecutive days. During this time the Joint Water Commission (JWC)was cutting our water back while they brought on their new transmission lines, which created some complications, but the recovery has gone well since then. Dennis also reported that Tigard was recently approached by the City of Tualatin to furnish water to the Bridgeport Commercial Development located within their area. Tigard's pressure gradients are higher in that area than Tualatin. Further pursuit of this issue would be through an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). There would be no need for capital improvements as the mains are already there. Tigard would receive the connection charges and it could be a good step in reaping the benefits from additional water sales. Intergovernmental Water Board 2 3une 11,2003 DRAFT COPY ,T Richard Sattler distributed handouts and reported on the summer supply plan. Several changes to this year's plan include downplaying the reservoir storage to better meet typical operational capabilities and we have also confirmed some capacities from suppliers and flow tests. This is the first year that the ability to supply the system exceeds the projected customer demands. The Beaverton intertie now brings in an additional 2 mgd and the ASR project brings in 1 mgd,which brings some security to the system. The even/odd watering days have also been successful in managing water demands. Citizens applying for rebates to conservation measures has proven to be a successful program. 5. Long Term Water Supply Report— Ed Wegner Ed Wegner updated the board on the two major water supply options that are being investigated. The Portland wholesale contract negotiations have started. Meetings are schedules every other week and three preliminary meetings have been held so far. The ground rules are being set and they are now formulating the nomination of supply and pricing negotiations. With the JWC, three project studies are going on: • Feasibility study for raising Scoggins Dam or other alternatives • Raw water pipeline to bring water to the treatment plant • Tunnel project, with or without the dam raise Negotiations have taken place for a 4 mgd buy-in partnership with the JWC. The JWC will hear recommendations at their July board meeting and hopefully will have something to adopt at their October board meeting. Mr. Wegner asked for clarification on the board's previous discussion about the Wilsonville/Willamette River issue. The board said they wanted information reported about capacity, pipe sizing, amount of water, tracking the regions total assets, quality of the water, etc. A. Willamette River Water Coalition/IGA—Tigard still is a member of the Willamette Water Supply Agency (WWSA). Revisions for housekeeping purposes to the original IGA that was formed have been formulated and approved by the City Attorney and will be going before the City Council in July. • 180 day withdrawal period changed to be that notification be must be given by January 1 if pulling out by July 1 in order to set budgets • new funding formula; total budget cut in half and equally divided by the number of agencies, then the other half will be divided up based on the size of each agency 6. Informational Items—Ed Wegner Informational packet articles were briefly described. 7. Public Comments—None 8. Non-Agenda Items - None Intergovernmental Water Board 3 June 11,2003 DRAFT COPY 9. Next meeting date— Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 5:30 pm in the Water Auditorium There will also be a meeting held in conjunction with the Tigard City Council at 6:30 pm following the regular meeting. 10. Adjournment Commissioner Brian Moore motioned to adjourn the meeting, Commissioner Penner seconded the motion, and all board members voted in favor of adjournment. J Intergovernmental Water Board 4 ,lune 11,2003 DRAFT COPY A New Program Wash The City of Tigard is now offering a $50 ®� ® �4oeb ®9' ����$� rebate when you purchase an approved o Call e Citd at 503 718- Clothes energy efficient clothes washer and a l th y ( ) install it within the City of Tigard Water 2599, checkout site at Service Area. www•ci.tigard.or.us/water or email Wisely sara@ci.tigard.or.us for the rebate J �� ��®��� ������������ terms and conditions and an application �r form. So you can save.: ♦ Water ♦ Electricity p Complete the $50 rebate application ♦ Detergent 6 Time form and return it with proof of a n d ♦ Clothing wear Et tear ♦ And money! purchase for an approved machine. Upon approval, your water bill will be Receive Why are we doing this? credited within 4-6 weeks. We want to encourage water conservation o Prior to approval, an on-site whenever possible, so that we can always inspection may be required by City of meet our customer's needs. Tigard staff. Eligibility Requirements o Rebates are given on a first-come first ♦ You are a City of Tigard water cus- served basis. tomer in good standing and live in a sin- p A limited number of rebates are gle family residence. available. ti ♦ The washing machine is on the current Energy Star Qualifying Washers list. ♦ The washing machine is purchased be- t L tween July 1, 2003 and June 30, 2004 � . '`'i.'! and installed within the City of Tigard Water Service boundary. `�� City of Tigard Water Conservation Program Residential Water Efficient 13125 SW Hall Blvd Clothes WasherRebate • .. , Tigard, OR 97223 City of Tigard Water Conservation (503) 718-2599 Orgyeff'iient washers _ ,, r sage Q vrr, 1 Ius� ad , nco; teCilnot . en�ir�Y dna. rfiOney . : 1 RAPPLICATION �, �. Designed for Efficiency The results: Energy efficient washers use more than 1 Your Name: 35% less water and 55% less electricity than standard New energy efficient washing machines use machines. Better water extraction means less dryer 1 Installation Address: superior designs that require less time - for even more energy savings. 1 water to get clothes thoroughly Tigard Water Account No: clean. These machines use Choosing the Right Model 1 sensors to match the hot water Home Phone: needs to the load, preventing Energy efficient clothes washers come in a range of 1 water and energy waste. capacity from about 1.6 cubic feet to 2.9 cubic feet. 1 Mailing Address: Both top-loading and front- A typical large capacity washer is about 2.7 cubic 1 City/State/Zip: loading models will get clothes feet. Because washers are most efficient when they cleaner and take better care of your fabrics- are fully loaded, you should choose a size that most 1 l` �'�" i"- while using less water and energy than closely matches your laundry needs. 1 Manufactuter: standard washing machines. ' Some washer models can be stacked or mounted 1 Model: Front loading models are similar in design to washers used in Laundromats. These under a counter top, a useful feature for people with 1 Serial Number horizontal-axis or tumble action machines limited space. repeatedly lift and drop clothes instead of1 Dealer's Name: moving them around a central axis. Approved clothes washers are made by a number of 1 manufacturers and are carried by appliance retailers Dealers Phone Number: Top-loading energy efficient washers use nationwide. To see a list of approved washers, visit 1 sensor technology to closely control the the Energy Star web site: www.enereystar.gov. Date of Purchase: incoming water temperature. They reduce 1 water consumption by spraying clothes with More energy efficient washer and retailer information 1 You MUST attach proof of purchase to this application! repeated high-pressure rinses to remove soap can also be found on the State of Oregon Office of 1 I certify that the information I have provided is true and correct. I have residues rather than soaking them in a full Energy web site: www.enerey.state.or.us. purchased the washing machine described above for installation at the loca- tub of rinse water. tion indicated,and I have not previously received a rebate from the City of State Energy Tax Credits 1 Tigard for a low water use washing machine. I understand that Tigard re- Save Ener and Water serves the right to inspect the installation for conformity to program require- gy In addition to this rebate, the State of Oregon has a 1 ments,prior to payment of rebate. A typical household does nearly 400 loads of Residential Energy Tax Credit program for premium- 1 laund per year, usingabout 40 gallons of efficiency appliances. Qualified premium- laundry p y g ! - � : washing machines will result in a tax 1 Applicant Signature water for a full load with a con- ■—+, credit of $160 to $230, depending on ventional washer. the model. 1 Date In contrast, a full-size energy efficient 1 clothes washer uses 20-25 gallons per I fpm Most appliance dealers have tax credit applications and a list of qualifying Mail this rebate application, along with an load. You could save as much as 7,000 1 original sales receipt or purchase invoice to: gallons of water each year and also save , models. You may also call 1 the energy that would have been needed 1-800-221-8035 or visit the Oregon City of Tigard to heat the water. This adds up to savings Office of Energy web site: 1 www.enerey.state.or.us. Water Conservation Program Pram for you and is a big boost for the environ- 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd ment. Tigard, OR 97223 Lead and Copper Public Meeting Lead and copper can enter the water through corrosion within the747% 4 Announcement distribution system and/or in household plumbing systems. Tigard 0 participates in a joint monitoring program with the City of Portland and is a , Interested customers are responsible for collecting water samples from local sites representative of our ,_ � � �•°`� �• invited to attend the water sources, distribution system and homes with lead solder in the plumb- ing. lumb- d Intergovernmental Waterg f Elevated lead levels were NOT detected in Tigard's water sources. Board meeting held on the _"=#Yw. s=kap d However, in November 2002, 10%of the homes sampled contained lead levels second Wednesday of each exceeding the EPA's action level for lead of 15 parts per billion. Tigard'S Water Sources month at 5:30 pm. PROVIDING NOTE: Infants and children who drink water containing lead in excess of the action level could experienc delays in their physical or mental develop- CONSUMERS WITH In 2002 Tigard supplied over 2 billion gallons of water to the 47,000 residents The meeting is held at the of King City, Durham, two-thirds of Tigard and the unincorporated area of Bull ment. Children could show slight deficits in attention span and learning CLEANS SAFE Tigard Water Building abilities. Adults,who drink this water over many years, could develop kidneyMountain. In order to meet the current water demands of our customers,Tigard Auditorium, located at problems or high blood pressure. Infants and children are typically more DRINKING WATER purchases 90%of its water supply from two reliable high-quality sources—the Bull 8777 SW Burnham Street in vulnerable to lead in drinking water than the general population. Run Watershed and Trask-Tualatin River Watershed. _ The City ofTigard is Tigard, Oregon. 7 The Bull Run Watershed is managed by the City of Portland Water Bureau. A 90th #of Sites Maximum pleased to present its annual surface water supply, the watershed is located in the Mt. Hood National Forest. In i Contaminant Percentile Action Level Exceeding Contaminant Sources of water quality report for the year addition, Portland maintains groundwater wells to help meet the increase in water — --- — — — — — — — values (A L) Action Level Goal Contaminantdemand during the summer and fall months, as well as to provide a backup source Levels (MCLG) 2002. In order.to ensure that the during emergencies. The Trask-Tualatin River Watershed is also a surface water Este'iuforme contiene AL is exceeded'If water being,delivered is of the source. Located in the coast range, the watershed is managed by the Joint Water . . informaci6n muy importante more than Commission (IWC). No.samples Corrosion of highest itali Tigard stab sobre su agua para beber. 10%of the g q ty+ g Traduzcalo o hable con Copper 0.50 ppm homes tested exceeded � 1.3 ppm plumbing In 2002,Tigard'S demand ranged from 6.1 million gallons per day in winter AL systems members are routinely monitor- months and u to 12.3 million gallons of water during the summer. In order to alguien que to entienda bien. have levels P $ g greater than accommodate surges in water demand, Tigard is able to supplement the water 1.30 ppm ing the water throughout the (Translation: This report contains supply with water pumped from city-owned, operated and maintained ground water AL is distribution system and at our wells. important information about your corrosion of drinking water. Translate it,or exceeded if 19 of the more than f47(13%) household sources. This report outlines the Recognizing a need for ownership in a water supply capable of meeting speak with someone who and understands it.) Lead 17.0 ppb 10%of the samples Zero ppb commercial analysis of Tigard's drinking current and future water demands,Tigard is researching the feasibility and homes tested collected building affordability of becoming a partner with the Joint Water Commission. have levels exceeded plumbing water quality for the past year greater than the Al 15.0 ppb systems and compares that data to the Testing the Waters standards set by the United Drinking water sources(both tap and bottled) include rivers, lakes, streams, States Environmental Protection ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. Water travels over the surface of the land and/ Agency(EPA). The City of or through the ground, dissolving naturally occurring minerals which, in some cases, includes radioactive materials and other substances resulting from the presence of Tigard is happy to report that the animals or human activity. Contaminants that might be expected in untreated City of Tigard PRSRT-STD quality of our water continues to water include microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria; inorganic U.S. POSTAGE PAID contaminants such as salts and metals; pesticides and herbicides; organic chemicals 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PORTLAND,OR meet and/or surpass all Federal from industrial or petroleum use; and radioactive contaminants. Tigard, OR 97223 PERMIT NO. 2528 and State drinking water stan- Because of water's natural cycle, drinking water, including bottled water, may dards. We encourage you to reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. However, the presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that the water review the information provided. poses a health risk. To ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the Environmental If you have any questions or Protection Agency(EPA) prescribes regulations limiting the amount of certain ****** ECRWSScontaminants in water provided by public water systems. The EPA establishes test concerns please contact the City methods and monitoring requirements for contaminants and requires public water Postal Customer of Tigards Water Quality systems to give public notice in the event of a violation. Program Coordinator at 503-718- More information about contaminants and potential health effects are available from the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791 or on their website at 2604. www.epa.gov/ow. - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Water Youi i i i Important Definitions Drink... I ' Maximum Contaminant Level Goal(MCLG):The level of In addition to the 150 _ contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or ex- '. a pected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. different contaminants tested for . it ®Yl iCa1O Maximum Contaminant Level(MCL):The highest level of a by our-wbolesale waterpraviders, - tl ~ - a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLS are set as close to the City of Tigard monitors the - " ___ ` 5 _' ° ° - - ----_-...-- -.- -.__. -_------__ . - _.___-_-.'. ___ _. - --._.- - , est available treatment technology. �. - � `''� � the MCLGs as feasible using the b water quality through water 1bta1 Collform November samples �; Conform bacteria may be ' q ty b' Naturally present in Action Level(AL): The concentration of a contaminant, which, if samples collected throughout the I had detected 0:02% present in no more than Zero bacteria detected ! environment ' ' p g conform bacteria ! 5%.df monthly samples ° exceeded, triggers treatment, or other requirements that a water system water distribution system. Phe must follow. adjacent table outlines the lhrbidity (Range) ; Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTUs): Turbidity is a measure of contaminants found to be present Chi,faltered 0.24 - 2.20 NTUs 5.00 NTU Not Applicable Soil runoff how clear the water looks because it can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth. in Tigard's water supply. Filtered 0.03 -0.07 NTUs 0.5 NTU 0.3 NTU Parts r million(ppm), parts per billion (ppb) These units If yQu.. �Ye a ,gttesC ons,_ • . ',Giardia- 1 sample of 126- �j Treatment Technique II ji +, •• ,describe the levels of detected-contaminants. One-part,per million is 1• and/or concerns regarding this - j liters of water had j, required-Disinfection to Zero cysts Animal wastes ' equal to one minute in two years. One part per billion is equal to one 12 cysts Ii inactivate 99!"9%of cysts ' minute in 2,000 years. Mort, contact the City c "7��ard � _ _ �; _ � � Water Quality Program Coordi- Cryptosporidium" 1 sample of 126 Picocurries per Liter(pCi/1): A standard measurement of beta nator at 503-71,8-2604 or check liters of water had Not Applicable Not Applicable Animal wastes ; particles in water. the city's website at 3 oocysts www.ci.tigard.or.us/water. Barium! 0.012 ppm 2.00 ppm j 2.00 ppm Erosion of natural deposits Important Health Fluoride* 0.120 ppm 4.00 ppm 4.00 ppm Erosion of natural deposits 9 in groundwater Unregulated Contaminants ' Information - - --- - - - --- - ; Nitrate (Range) ! I CRYPTOSPORIDIUM is a microorganism(protozoan)naturally It is important to note that ! j Erosion of natural deposits; present in surface water supplies throughout the world. Surface water some people may be more vulner- UnjWered 0.03 - 0.60 ppm. 10.0 ppm 10.0 ppm animal wastes; farms; septic I supplies are particularly vulnerable if they receive runoff or pollution able to contaminants in drinking ! systems ' from human or animal wastes. Since wildlife inhabits both the Trask- ' Filtered ND- 1.00 ppm ' water than the general population. _--- --- _.- - . _ if _- . _ -.-_-_._.._-_. _.. .__.. __._ __ _______.___._- .-_ _-- _ .___ ___ Tualatin River Watershed and Bull Run Watershed, the managing agen- Specifically, immuno-compromised Sodium" Added to water during , cies regularly monitor for Cryptosporidium and have done so for more ; persons such as cancer patients 1.10 - 12.0 ppm Not Applicable Not Applicable treatment and erosion of than ten years. undergoing chemotherapy,.persons natural deposits ° who have undergone organ Occasionally, low levels of Cryptosporidium are found to be ° Gross Alpha* 1.71 pCi/1 15:0 pCi/1 0,00 pCi/1 Erosion of natural deposits present. New national standards have been established to further reduce transplants, persons with HIV/AIDS _-_s-,--_ -;�-•-- = :._ ,-,--- -- -- -__ _ . - . .. _- the nsks of illness from C ryptosporndium. Symptoms of infectioninclude or other immune system disorders, Gross Beta• 12.2 pCiA 50.0 pCi/1 ,� 0.00 PCi/1 in groundwater aquifers nausea, abdominal cramps and diarrhea. Most healthy individuals are or some elderly and infants; can be Total Haloacetic Acids 22.6-49.0 b able to overcome the disease within a few weeks. However, immuno- particularly at risk from infections. pp 60.0 b 0.00 b ° ' 30.0 avg. ppb pp pp ° compromised people have more difficulty and are at greater risk of These persons should seek advice - Byproducts of drinking n developing severe, life threatening illnesses. Immuno-compromised ' about drinking water from their water chlorination ' Total Trihalomethanes 18.2-36.3 ppb ° individuals are encouraged to consult their doctor regarding appropriate health care providers. The Envi- 26.5 av , b 80,0 ppb 0.00 ppb ° g PP ° precautions to avoid infection. Cryptosporidium must be ingested for it to � ronrnental Protection Agency and Disinfectant Residual - - o cause disease, and may be spread through means other than drinking o the Centers for Disease Control and ° water. ° Prevention provide guidelines on Unfiltered Chloramines ND- 1.9 ppm Water additive used,to o a the appropriate means to lessen the 4.00 ppm 4.00 ppm ° RADON is a naturally occurring, radioactive gas that you cannot n control microbes G see, taste, or smell. Radon is found all over the United States. Compared ° risk of infection by I Filtered Chlorine .19 - 1.02 ppm �,� Cryptosporidium and other micro- u to radon entering the home through soil, radon from tap water will bial contaminants. For more ' Oregon Department of Human Services-Drinking Water Program allows monitoring for some contaminants less than once per ® typically be a small source of radon in indoor air. Radon is a known e information can the Safe Drinking year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Some of the data,.though representative, is more ; human carcinogen. Breathing air containing radon can lead to lung ; Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791 or than one year old. o cancer. Drinking water containing radon may also cause increased risk of visit the EPA's web site at 's These are unregulated contaminants. Unreguatled contaminant monitoring helps the EPA to determine where certain e stomach cancer. For more information about radon, call the EPA's Radon www. a. ov/ow. ° Hotline (800-SOS-RADON). ep b' contaminants occure and wheatber it needs to reguadte those contaminants. ° � - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Year to Date Annual Totals Tualatin 1 % ASR Recovery 4% Well #2 2% COB ❑ COB 29% El TVW D ❑ Bull Run ❑ Well #2 TVWD 5% ASR Recovery Bull Run ❑ Tualatin 59% Intergovernmental Water Board Meeting Informational Items Supplement July 15, 2003 • Memo from Jane Turner, City Manager of King City, regarding Change in Water Board Appointees • June 20, 2003, memo- King City water fee will not go into effect on July 1; 2003 • Letter to Commissioner Dick Winn dated June 25, 2003 • Joint Water Commissioner New Rate Calculations • Proposed Unit Cost of Water to the City of Tigard, memo from Mary Gruss, City of Hillsboro, to the JWC • Notice of Expedited Withdrawal (Deannexation) Decision from City of Durham • Oregonian article, July 3, 2003, Change of name, laws for panel questioned • OregonLive.com, Talks flow toward a new agency for water, July 7, 2003 06/19/2005 09:41 FAX 500 639 6795 CITY OF TIGARD -+ Public Works IA002 06/19/2003 09:24 5036393771 CITY OF KING CITY PAGE 02/02 KING CITY 16300 aw.116th Aveam Ybg cft o„egm 9712j.M w�� Fbons;c�ae)s39.4o9z-�g ceoeD s�arn 6/19/2003 TO- TIGARD WATER MGOVERNMENTAL WAUM BOARD FROM- JAMIE n CITY MANA SUBJECT: Chaege is Water Board Appointees i Due to tate resignation of Jan Drangehoh,CouncHor Diw Wim will become the primary ve for ging City, i AHMU te: Gerry McReynolds i i Ed Wegner- FYI Fade From: Tom Imdieke To: Dennis Koellermeier; Ed Wegner Date: 6/20/03 7:47AM Subject: FYI Talked to Jane Turner from King City yesterday and.the water fee will not go into effect on July 1. There will be an election on September 16. ;.- V. r._u,.0 ,•t.7"xe a e? �st4axs, n., °n.n.:e• s.,,.,r,_ .. . .,ra ?, r,. ;, ate CITY OF TIGARD OREGON June 25, 2003 Commissioner Dick Winn 16270 SW King Charles King City, OR 97224 Dear Dick: On behalf of the Intergovernmental Water Board and City of Tigard staff, I want to take this opportunity to welcome you as the new representative from King City on the IWB. The Board of Commissioners regularly meets on the second Wednesday of each month at 5:30 pm. The fourth Wednesday of each month is also set aside in the event of a special meeting, but typically we only meet the one time each month. The meetings are held in the Tigard Water District Auditorium, which is located at 8777.SW Burnham Street, unless you are otherwise notified. A light dinner is served at these meetings. The next IWB meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 5:30 pm, and will be followed by a joint meeting with the Tigard City Council in Town Hall at 6:30 pm. Staff will be giving a presentation about long-term water supply options. Once again, welcome! If I can answer any questions you may have, please do not hesitate to call me.. I look forward to working with you in the future. Sincerely, Ed Wegner Director of Public Works EW:tw &tP 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)6842772 New Rate Eff July 1, 2003 Page 1 of I Attached is the new rate calculation for the City of Tigard. The intent is to update the Commission on the new rate during the July 11, 2003 JWC meeting. Using the previous rate of $.6674, the 3.5m9d anticipated to be purchased by Tigard would have cost $1,139,844. Using the proposed rate of $.6808 the cost is $1,162,690. This represents a 2% increase. I just wanted to let Tigard and Beaverton know prior to sending to the rest of the Commission members. I will be out of the office beginning_ on Thursday,July 3rd through Monday,July 7th, returning to the office on Tuesday,the 8th If you could let me know by the close of business tomorrow, Wednesday,July 2"d if you have any concerns/questions, I would appreciate it. I will then ask Joe's staff to circulate to the Commission members so they can review prior to the meeting on the 11th Thanks, Mary «20032004 Rate for Tigard.xls>> Joint Water Commission Ownership-based w/Combined Storage Unit Cost Reimbursement per Entity Annual Rate Hillsboro TVWD Forest Grove Beaverton Rate Element Annual CCF 2.0 rr 1,707,888 JWC Assets JWC Plant Depreciation $0.0307 $0.0138 $0.0061 $0.0031 $0.0077 Return on Invest 0.0838 0.0377 0.0168 0.0084 0.0209 JWC Tran;Depreciation $0.0033 $0.0018 $0.0004 $0.0012 Return on Invest 0.0074 0.0039 0.0008 0.0027 JWC Stora Depreciation $0.0312 $0.0123 $0.0065 $0.0046 $0.0077 Return on Invest 0.0907 0.0359 0.0189 0.0135 0.0224 JWC Wate Depreciation $0.0012 $0.0012 Return on Invest 0.0010 0.0010 JWC Total $0.2494 $0.1076 $0.0494 $0.0296 $0.0627 Beaverton (2) Transmission $0.0432 $0.0432 Storage 0.0342 0.0342 O&M-Pumping 0.0966 0.0966 Meter 0.0110 0.0110 Beaverton Total $0.1850 $0.1850 JWC O&M (3) JWC Transmission $0.0058 $0.0021 $0.0017 $0.0004 $0.0016 Treatment Plant 0.2195 0.0802 0.0642 0.0145 0.0606 Raw Water 0.02110.0077 0.0062 0.0014 0.0058 Total JWC O&M $0.2464 $0.0900 $0.0721 $0.0162 $0.0681 Total Proposed Rate $0.6808 $0.1976 $0.1216 $0.0458 $0.3158 (1) Storage includes combined ownership in Barney reservoir and Scoggins reservoir for each JWC member. (2) Provided by City of Beaverton. (3) Distributed by direct credit based on Annual Water Demand. C:\WIND0WS\TEMP\20032004 Rate for Tigard\Tigard Rate 7/1/03 2:33 PM Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HILLSBORO 13 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 8,2000 TO: Joint Water Commission FROM: Mary Gruss,City of Hillsboro SUBJECT: Proposed Unit Cost of Water to the City of Tigard During the regularly scheduled Joint Water Commission(JWC)meeting in April 2003, staff informed the Commission that the unit cost used to charge Tigard for water purchased would be revised to reflect current operations and maintenance costs. The attached worksheet shows the proposed unit cost of $.6922 compared to the current unit cost of $.6674. The proposed rate is a 3.71%increase over the current rate. If approved by the Commission, staff will bill Tigard for water purchased at$.6922, retroactive to July 1, 2003. History The Joint Water Commission began selling water to the City of Tigard in July 2000 and entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in May 2001. An interim unit cost of-$.4448 was used, as agreed upon by all JWC members and the City of Tigard, with the understanding that Economic and Engineering Services (EES)would develop a rate that included a return on investment as well as a.basis for allocating the revenue back to each partner. EES and JWC staff members worked together in developing the current $.6674 unit cost and revenue allocation model that was implemented July 1, 2002. The total unit cost consists of the following components — JWC Assets, Beaverton (for transmission and pumping), and JWC O&M (operations and maintenance). Staff updated the model for the 2003-2004 budgeted O&M costs, The City of Beaverton increased their O&M Pumping costs due to an increase in electricity costs. The annual depreciation expense and return on investment, included in the JWC Asset component, is a fixed cost. The unit cost is determined by dividing the annual depreciation expense and return on investment by each agency's pro-rata share of budgeted water production. The 2003-2004 JWC budget anticipated selling 3.5mgd to Tigard, a 1.5mgd increase over the 2.Omgd budgeted for in 2002-2003. This resulted in a decrease from$.2846 to$:2568 for the JWC Assets portion of the unit cost calculation. Randy Goff from EES will be present at the meeting to help answer any questions regarding the proposed unit rate. CAWINDOWSWEMPNemo on 20032004 Unit Rate for Tigard.doc Page 1 of 1 Joint Water Commission Ownership-based w/Combined Storage Unit Cost Reimbursement per Entity Annual Rate Rate Element Current Proposed Annual CCF 2.0m d 962,567 1,707,888 (3.5mgd) JWC Assets JWC Plant Depreciation $0.0333 $0.0307 Return on Invest 0.0939 0.0838 JWC Transmission Depreciation $0.0059 $0.0056 Return on Invest 0.0137 0.0125 JWC Storage (1) Depreciation $0.0338 $0.0312 Return on Invest 0.1015 0.0907 JWC Water Rights Depreciation $0.0013 $0.0012 Return on Invest 0.0012 0.0010 JWC Total $0.2846 $0.2568 -9.78% decrease Beaverton (2) Transmission $0.0432 $0.0432 Storage 0.0362 0.0342 O&M;Pumping 0.0500 0.0966 Meter 0.0110 0.0110 Beaverton Total $0.1404 $0.1850 31.77% increase JWC O&M (3) JWC Transmission $0.0029 $0.0098 Treatment Plant 0.2189 0.2195 Raw Water 0.0206- 0.0211 Total JWC O&M $0.24247 $0.2504 3.30% increase Total Proposed Rate $0.6674 $0.6922 3.711 increase Extended Using Projected Annual CCF $ 642,417 $1,182,129 (1) Storage includes combined ownership in Barney reservoir and Scoggins reservoir for each JWC member. (2) Provided by City of Beaverton. (3) Distributed by direct credit based on Annual Water Demand. I'-%WINn0WC\TFMP\9nn39004 Rata for Tinarrt\Comnarisnn to Currant Rata 7/9/03 4.28 PM Pana 1 of 1 City of Durham 17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road P.O. Box 23483 Durham, OR 97281-3483 NOTICE OF EXPEDITED WITHDRAWAL (DEANNEXATION) DECISION TO: X Bureau of the Census X Verizon X Qwest X Northwest Natural Gas (2) X PGE X Keller Drop Box X- Pride Disposal, Mike Leichner X Clean Water Services X Metro Area Communications Commission X Washington County Consolidated Comm. Agency X Comcast Cable, Melody Malone L_Tigard Water District, Ed Wegner Tigard/Tualatin School District, Maryann Escriva FROM: Roe[ Lundquist, City Administrator DATE: June 26, 2003 Enclosed is City of Durham Ordinance No. 214-03 passed on June 24, 2003 approving withdrawal (deannexation) of 6.01 acres from the City of Durham effective on July 24, 2003. The enclosure includes a legal description and map of the area withdrawn (deannexed). NOTE: This same property was annexed by Tualatin with an effective date of July 24, 2003 and that material will be sent to you under separate cover. Property withdrawn (deannexed) by this action: Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Assessor's Map 13CC, Tax Lot 1800. Address: 8515 SW Tualatin Road. Owner: City of Tualatin. The withdrawn territory is the northern portion of Tualatin's Community Park. If you have questions, please contact Roel Lundquist at 503 639-6851. forms%enn notice of decision(12102) ?&TLANNDKWam%Aw=ab=\20M\03 I W Ducham Deem m Comty Pk\Duduun Form Notice ofDoomm FvuMm CITY OF DURHAM ORDINANCE NO. 214-03 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING TERRITORY AT 8515 SW TUALATIN ROAD AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS TAX LOT 1800, WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP 2S 1 13CC, FROM THE CITY OF DURHAM EFFECTIVE JULY 24, 2003. Whereas, the City of Durham is authorized to withdraw territory by ORS 222 and has fulfilled the notice and hearings required by those statutes; and Whereas, the subject territory qualifies for withdrawal under ORS.222.460; and Whereas, the withdrawal of the territory has been requested by 100 percent of the property owners; and Whereas, there are no electors in the subject territory; and Whereas,the applicant has requested an Expedited Withdrawal process in accordance with . Metro Code Chapter 3.09.045; and Whereas, no necessary party as defined in Metro Code has opposed the withdrawal; and Whereas, the withdrawal is consistent with the regional urban growth goals and objectives, functional plans, and regional framework plan adopted by Metro; and Whereas, the withdrawal meets the criteria for decision set out in Metro Code Chapter 3.09.050 and the Council finds that the de-annexation is in the public interest; now therefore, The City of Durham, Oregon ordains as follows: Section 1. The territory described in Exhibit"A" is withdrawn from the City of Durham. Section 2. The withdrawal is effective July 24, 2003. Section 3. The City Administrator is directed to forward copies of this Ordinance to Metro within 5 days of the authentication date. Section 4. The City Administrator is directed to forward copies of this Ordinance and all other required materials to all public utilities and telecommunications utilities operating within the City in accordance with ORS 222.005. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Durham, Oregon this 24 h day of June 2003. First Reading: May 27, 2003 Second Reading: June 24, 2003 CITY O URHAM By: Gery'Schir do, Mayor ATTEST: Roel C. Lundquist, City Administrator/Recorder 214-03 Withdrawng Park Temtory.doc 1� 5 „� Y Er e l t �• r P N �1 .,•�, �•�, 1 iF��9�-a �;. ,�,,.5 r-� _ Mme.,. 42, 37 �nq�n' s(oh s._..s pYi,,7 d 1 7 .� 5"J-M1jV7' `ll k q S � t V� Y t j•.h &aye `C� j 31fMYtT '� Tel i '�'�1 ,•<, nr ,517, al v � FC' k ift All i 1 i • • . � I a r � , Legal Description For Territory To Be Withdrawn(deannexed)From the City of Durham. A tract of land situated in the SW '/e of the SW '/a of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1_West,of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington, and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the South line of Section 13 and the East'line for the Oregon Electric Railroad right of way,said point being East 40 more or less feet from the Southwest corner of Section 13; thence along the East right of way of said Railroad in a Northerly direction 1205 feet more or less to the middle channel of the Tualatin River;thence Southeasterly following the middle of the channel of said river, 1265 feet more or less to where the same intersects the South line of Section 13;thence West along the section line 390 feet more or less to the point of beginning.