The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP2013-00003 EXPIRED CUP2O13 - 00003 Senn Park I BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Steve Martin on behalf of the ) F I N A L O R D E R City of Tigard Parks Division for a conditional use permit ) to develop a new pocket park on a 0.25-acre parcel at ) CUP2013-00003 9868 SW 74th Avenue in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Senn Park) A. SUMMARY 1. Steve Martin, City of Tigard Parks &Facilities Manager, filed the application on behalf of the City of Tigard Parks Division (the "applicant"). The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to develop a new pocket park on a 0.25-acre parcel located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue in the City of Tigard; also known as Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1 S 125DC, Tax Lots 09500 and 19600 (the "site"). The site and surrounding properties are zoned R-4.5 (Low Density Residential, 4.5 units per acre). The site is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The site contains a small open area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk, and planter strip. The proposal also includes an entry sign. Additional basic facts about the site and surrounding land and applicable approval standards are provided in the Amended Staff Report to the Hearings Officer dated December 9, 2013 (the "Amended Staff Report"), incorporated herein by reference. 2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer")conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in this matter. At the public hearing, City staff recommended approval of the application, subject to conditions of approval in the Amended Staff Report. A representative of the applicant testified in support of the application. One person testified with questions and concerns about the application. Disputed issues in this case include: a. Whether the proposed development will cause prohibited impacts to sensitive lands on or near the site; b. Whether the Code prohibits development within the mapped habitat areas on the site; c. Whether the applicant is required to include copies of the City's sensitive lands maps in the application; and d. Whether the application complies with the approval criteria for a Conditional Use Permit. 3. The hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed development complies with the applicable approval criteria for a conditional use permit based on the findings and conclusions included and incorporated herein and subject to conditions at the end of this final order. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this application on December 9, 2013. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing,the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts,bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter. 2. City planner Agnes Kowacz summarized the Amended Staff Report and the proposed development. She noted that the applicant proposes to develop the site with a trailhead,hard and soft surfaced trails, playground equipment, and bike racks. No buildings are proposed. a. She testified that there are no vegetated corridors on this site. The proposed trail alignment avoids the steep sloped areas on the site. 3. Steve Duh testified for the applicant and summarized the proposed park development. a. He noted that the City adopted a Parks Master Plan in 2009. The Master Plan was developed with substantial community involvement, including multiple public meetings to guide the design of parks development in the City. In November 2010 the City passed a bond measure to fund park improvements consistent with the Master Plan. This site was included as a high priority project in the Master Plan. The Metzger area is deficient in park lands. This 0.25-acre site is the only area available for park development. b. The applicant will develop the site as a pocket park, containing a play area on the upper shelf of the site and a trail leading down the slope to the adjacent city owned open space. The trail will primarily be used by City staff for maintenance access to the open space tract. The park will not emphasize the trail. No signs or parking will be provided. The applicant will construct a two-foot wide wood chip surfaced trail down the slope, extending to the north boundary of the site. There is an existing fence along the north boundary of the site,between the site and the adjacent open space tract. The applicant will provide a gateway in the existing fence to provide access to the open space tract. No pathway or other development is proposed on the adjacent parcel. He agreed to a condition of approval requiring a locked gate in the fence to limit public access to the adjacent open space tract. c. There are two existing street trees on the site. However the existing trees are designated nuisance trees. Therefore the applicant will remove the existing trees and CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 2 replace them with four trees from the City's current street tree list. The applicant will remove a total of five trees and plant 13 new trees on the site. d. The steep sloped areas of the site are located in the north central portion of the site. No development is proposed in these areas. e. There are no vegetated corridors on the site. Ash Creek is located approximately 100 feet north of the site. CWS regulations require a 50-foot vegetated corridor. Therefore the nearest vegetated corridor is located approximately 50 feet north of the north boundary of the site. f. There are no wetlands on the site. g. The majority of the site is mapped "lower value" wildlife habitat. The site consists of Lots 28 and 29 of Ash Creek Estates subdivision. The City approved the subdivision, even though the majority of the subdivision site was mapped as wildlife habitat. 4. Sue Beilke testified on behalf of Fans of Fanno Creek ("Fans") and summarized her written testimony, Hearing Exhibit 1. a. She expressed concerns with the proposed trailhead and pathway. The pathway appears to go down a steep slope and through the vegetated corridor and possibly entering the wetlands. CDC 18.775.020.B(3) prohibits pathways within the vegetated corridor. The applicant should be required to provide maps of the sensitive lands on and near this site to facilitate the public's review of the application. b. Much of the site contains mapped habitat areas. TDC 18.775.020.H prohibits any development on such sensitive lands. The Staff Report does not address sensitive lands, including mapped habitat areas. c. The adjacent property contains sensitive lands, including: a stream, wetlands, vegetated corridors, wildlife habitat, and steep slopes. CWS required installation of the existing fence to protect these sensitive lands and limit public access. The proposed trail will encourage public access. d. She questioned whether the application complies with TDC 18.330.030.A(2). 5. At the end of the hearing, the hearings officer held the record open for two days, until 5:00 p.m. December 11, 2013, to allow the applicant an opportunity to submit maps of the sensitive lands on and near the site and to submit argument and evidence addressing the wildlife habitat regulations. The hearings officer held the record open for an additional week, until December 18, 2013, for the public to respond to the new evidence submitted by the applicant. The hearings officer held the record open for a third CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 3 week, until December 26, 2013, for the applicant to submit a final argument, without any new evidence. The record in this case closed at 5:00 p.m. December 23, 2013. 6. The following evidence was submitted during the open record period: a. The City submitted a memorandum dated December 10, 2013 and copies of Ordinance 06-20. b. Ms. Beilke submitted a letter dated December 12, 2013 on behalf of Fans. c. No new testimony or evidence was submitted during the second week of the open record period. The applicant submitted its closing argument on December 23, 2013 and requested the hearings officer close the record on that date. 7. Pursuant to the applicant's request the record in this case closed at 5:00 p.m. on December 23, 2013. C. DISCUSSION 1. City staff recommended that the hearings officer approve the application,based on the affirmative findings and subject to conditions of approval in the Amended Staff Report. The applicant accepted those findings and conditions without exceptions. The hearings officer adopts the findings and conclusions in the Amended Staff Report as his own except to the extent they are inconsistent with the findings and discussion in this final order. 2. There are no wetlands, vegetated corridors, floodplains, or drainageways on the site. The vegetated corridor associated with Ash Creek is located on the adjacent property and extends to the north boundary of the site. However the vegetated corridor does not extend onto this site. No development is proposed on the adjacent property and it is not part of the site. Therefore the adjacent property is irrelevant to this application. a. The proposed trail, which will extend to the north boundary of the site, could facilitate public access to the adjacent property. There is an existing fence separating this site from the adjacent property. The hearings officer finds the fence will clearly demarcate the boundaries of the site and discourage trespass onto the adjacent property. b. The applicant proposed to create a gateway in the existing fence to facilitate maintenance access by City workers. The hearings officer finds that the applicant should be required to provide a locked gate to prevent unauthorized public access to the adjacent property. A condition of approval is warranted to that effect. CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 4 3. The site contains areas of slope in excess of 25-percent. See the "Existing Condition Topographic Survey, Plan Sheet 1. However the proposed development will largely avoid these steep sloped areas. The applicant will construct the majority of the playground in the relatively flat area in the southwest corner of the site. See the, "Site Development Plan." The applicant designed the trail alignment to avoid the majority of the steep sloped areas. A very short section, near the center of the trail, will pass through the steep sloped area. See the, "Site Development Plan."However this type of community recreation use is an outright permitted use in steep sloped areas. TDC 18.775.020.B(3). 4. The majority of the site is designated lower value habitat. The northwest corner of the site extends into areas designated moderate value habitat. See the City of Tigard Significant Habitat Areas map. However the hearings officer finds that the Code does not prohibit development in the mapped habitat areas on this site. a. The plain language of TDC 18.775.020.14 appears to prohibit any uses or development within mapped wildlife habitat areas that are outside of floodplains, drainageways, wetlands, vegetated corridors, steep slopes, and unstable ground. i. TDC 18.775 regulates development on"sensitive lands." "Sensitive lands" as defined by TDC 18.775.010.G include significant fish and wildlife habitat areas designated on the City of Tigard"Significant Habitat Areas Map." ii. TDC 18.775.020.H provides, "Except as explicitly authorized by other provisions of this chapter, all other uses are prohibited on sensitive land areas." TDC 18.775.020.A through .G. allow certain types of development and uses within floodplains, drainageways, wetlands, steep slopes, and unstable ground. TDC 18.775.090.B(5) allows certain types of development within vegetated corridors.' Mapped wildlife habitat areas are not listed in TDC 18.775 as areas where development or uses are permitted.Therefore the plain language of TDC 18.775.020.H appears to prohibit any uses or development within mapped wildlife habitat areas that are outside of floodplains, drainageways, wetlands, vegetated corridors, steep slopes, and unstable ground. b. However TDC 18.775.100.B and 18.715.020.A(1)(e) conflict with the plain language of TDC 18.775.020.H by expressly allowing development within certain mapped wildlife habitat areas. i. TDC 18.775.100.B authorizes the director to approve adjustments to the standards in the underlying zoning district, "[w]hen development is i Vegetated corridors are not listed as"sensitive lands"in TDC 18.775.G. However certain vegetated corridors are identified as"significant wetlands"on the City's Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map."See the City of Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors map. Therefore the vegetated corridors are"sensitive lands"as defined by TDC 18.775.G. CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 5 proposed ... within or adjacent to areas designated as `strictly limit' or `moderately limit' on the City of Tigard `Significant Habitat Areas Map."'2 (Emphasis added). ii. TDC 18.715.020.A(1)(e) allows the option of deducting mapped wildlife habitat areas when determining net development area. All other sensitive lands are required to be deducted. iii. If TDC 18.775.020.H prohibits any uses or development within mapped wildlife habitat areas, than TDC 18.775.100.B and 18.715.020.A(1)(e) are redundant. There is no need to adjust development standards for development within mapped habitat areas or make the inclusion of habitat areas optional if TDC 18.775.020.H prohibits any development within such areas. c. In addition, the Significant Habitat Areas Map identifies three levels of habitat: highest value,moderate value and lowest value habitat. The Code does not include these distinctions; TDC 18.775.020.H appears to prohibit uses and development within even the lowest value habitat areas. Floodplains, drainageways, wetlands and vegetated corridors are frequently contained within areas designated highest or moderate value habitat. (Compare the City's "Significant Habitat Areas Map"with the "100-year Floodplain"and"Wetlands & Stream Corridors"map. However the Code expressly allows certain types of development within these sensitive land areas. It would be inconsistent to allow development within the most sensitive/highest value habitat areas (floodplains, drainageways, wetlands, and vegetated corridors), while prohibiting all uses and development within the lowest value habitat areas. d. Moreover,this interpretation of TDC 18.775.020.H would restrict or prohibit certain road and trail connections. The Code allows roads and trails within certain sensitive lands. However such roads and trails must cross areas mapped as lowest value habitat in order to access the vegetated corridors, floodplains, and other sensitive lands areas where these uses are expressly allowed. e. The hearings officer must interpret the Code to resolve these conflicts. When interpreting the City's ordinances the hearings officer is required to follow the rules of statutory construction set out in ORS 174.020 and the Oregon Supreme Court's decisions in Portland General Electric v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or. 606, 859 P2d 1143 (1993) (PGE v. BOLI) and State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-173, 206 P3d 1042 (2009). The hearings officer must attempt to discern the intent of the City Council from the text and context of the ordinance and related ordinances. The hearings officer must construe the Code to give effect to all provisions and avoid redundancies. ORS 174.010. The hearings officer may also consider legislative history offered by a party. ORS 174.020(1)(b). The hearings officer"shall give the weight to the legislative history that the [hearings officer] considers to be appropriate." ORS 174.020(3). 2 The applicant has not,and is not,requesting an adjustment pursuant to TDC 18.775.100.B. CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 6 f. In this case, the hearings officer finds that the legislative history clearly resolves the conflict. i. TDC 18.775.020.H was adopted by Ordinance 06-20. Ordinance 06-20 included and adopted by reference' a Staff Report dated October 16, 2006 (the "Ordinance Staff Report"),which provides, "The proposed amendments will not result in increased development restrictions but will give property owners and developers the option to take advantage of greater regulatory flexibility in exchange for the use of habitat friendly practices."p. 3 of the Ordinance Staff Report. ii. A strict reading of TDC 18.775.020.H conflicts with this statement in the Ordinance Staff Report,by significantly increasing development restrictions. However TDC 18.775.100.B and 18.715.020.A(1)(e) are consistent with this statement in the Ordinance Staff Report,because these provisions provide incentives to reduce or avoid impacts to habitat areas. iii. The hearings officer finds that, in order to give any meaning to the Ordinance Staff Report, TDC 18.775 must be read to not impose any restrictions on development in mapped habitat areas that do not include other sensitive lands. The Code only includes incentives to encourage protection of habitat areas. This is consistent with the actual code language adopted by the City Council, which contains very few references to wildlife habitat. If the City Council had intended to prohibit all development in all levels of mapped habitat it would have said so explicitly, not by omission. This is also consistent with the remainder of the legislative history associated with Ordinance 06-20, which makes no mention of any intent to prohibit development in mapped habitat. 5. The applicant did not include copies of the City's sensitive lands maps in the application. Inclusion of such maps would have facilitated review of this application. However the failure to include these maps does not warrant denial of the application. Nothing in the Code requires the inclusion of such maps. The maps are available for review at the City and online through the City's website. Sensitive lands on this site are limited to the steep sloped areas on the northern portion of the site. The applicant's topographic survey map (Sheet 1) clearly illustrates the slopes on the site. 6. The hearings officer finds,based on the findings in the Staff Report,that the application complies with the approval criteria for a Conditional Use Permit, TDC 18.330.030.A. The hearings officer adopts those findings as his own. a. Contrary to Fans' statements,the Code does not require that the applicant"minimize"impacts of the use. The code only requires that the applicant demonstrate that, "The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features." The hearings officer 3 Section 3 of Ordinance 06-20 provides, in relevant part,"The findings and conclusions contained in the Staff Report dated October 16,2006...are adopted by reference..." CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 7 finds that it is feasible to accommodate the impacts of the park improvements proposed in this case. D. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the proposed conditional use permit, do or will comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. E. DECISION In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter,the hearings officer hereby approves CUP2013-00003 (Senn Park), subject to the following conditions of approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz, 503- 718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. 2. The project arborist shall perform twice monthly site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide an erosion control plan in conformance with the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates), for approval by Public Works Engineering. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 8 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements,to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz 503-718- 2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 4. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall provide the inventory data collected for the urban forestry plan. 5. Prior to final building inspection, the city to show that funds have been budgeted for the planting and establishment of the proposed trees. 6. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall install a locked gate in the fence at the north boundary of the site to allow City workers access to the adjacent property while preventing unauthorized access. 7. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall call for a final planning inspection to ensure the project was completed as shown on the approved plan. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 8. Prior to final inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure systems shall be in place and operation and have maintenance plans approved by Public Works and certified by an engineer with expertise in the relevant system. 9. All new utilities serving the site shall be placed underground. DATED this_day of January 2014. 1,‘" Joe Turner, Esq., AICP City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer CUP2013-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order (Senn Park) Page 9 Agenda Item: 1 Hearing Date:December 9,2013 Time:7:00PM AMENDED STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = 7 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SENN POCKET PARK CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2013-00003 APPLICANT/ City of Tigard Parks Division APPLICANT'S Conservation Technix OWNER: Steve Martin REP: Steven Duh 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PO Box 12736 Tigard,OR 97223 Portland,OR 97212 PROPOSAL: The City is requesting approval for development of a new pocket park and trailhead at 9868 SW 74th Avenue.The .25 acre site consists of two parcels and is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk,and planter strip. The proposal also includes an entry sign. LOCATION: The property is located at 9868 SW 74`''Avenue;Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S125DC,Tax Lots 09500, 19600. ZONING: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780,18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use and Sign will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the applicable approval standards as outlined in Section VI of this report. Therefore,Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 1 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz, 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. 2. The project arborist shall perform twice monthly site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non- compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide an erosion control plan in conformance with the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates), for approval by Public Works Engineering. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 4. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the inventory data collected for the urban forestry plan. 5. Prior to final building inspection, the city to show that funds have been budgeted for the planting and establishment of the proposed trees. 6. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall call for a final planning inspection to ensure the project was completed as shown on the approved plan. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 7. Prior to final inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure systems shall be in place and operation and have maintenance plans approvedby Public Works and certified by an engineer with expertise in the relevant system. 8. All new utilities serving the site shall be placed underground. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION. SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 2 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The City is requesting approval for development of a new pocket park and trailhead at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The proposal includes a trailhead with hard and soft trails, a playground area, benches and bike racks. The property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk, and planter strip. The proposal also includes an entry sign. Site History: The subject site had previously been approved as part of the Ash Creek Estates subdivision, as Lot 28 and Lot 29. In July 2007, site was acquired by the City of Tigard for development of a pocket park. A search of city records for previous land use reviews on the subject property found land use case files ZON2003- 00003, SUB2003-00010, PDR2003-00004,VAR2003-00036 &VAR2013-00037. These permits were for a rezone to allow a Planned Development Overlay, an approval to subdivide 9.3 acres into 29 lots, sensitive lands review for drainage ways, and adjustments related to cul-de-sacs. Vicinity Information: The site is located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The site is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The property is otherwise zoned R-4.5,low density residential and is surrounded on all sides by the same zone. Neighbor Comments: The applicant held a formal neighborhood meeting on August 1, 2013 with 5 neighbors in attendance. There was general consensus from participants in favor of the park design. The City did not receive any public comments. SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification Chapter 18.130 lists the Use Categories used in the Development Code. The proposed park is considered a Community Recreation use and is permitted as a conditional use in the R-4.5 zone. Summary of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type IIIA procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A. Type IIIA procedures apply to quasi-judicial actions that predominantly apply discretionary approval criteria. Type IIIA actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Findings for these code sections are in Section VI of this report. A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.705 -Access Egress and Circulation 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.780 - Signs 18.790 - Urban Forestry Plan 18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW AND APPROVAL CRITERIA AND FINDINGS SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 3 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS AND APPROVAL CRITERIA Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. The applicant requests approval of a new park use on the subject site. The following standards in this chapter ensure the proposed development will not adversely impact surrounding uses and public facilities. 18.330.030.A Approval Standards The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; As described in the applicant's narrative, the .25 acre site is adequately sized to accommodate the needs of the proposed park. While the City of Tigard does not maintain minimum park size criteria, pocket parks similar to the one proposed are typically sited on properties ranging from .25 ot1.0 acres in size. This approval standard is met. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; The site contains a flat, upper shelf along the south side of the property near SW 74th Avenue. This flat area will provide sufficient space for the proposed small playground. A proposed wood chip pathway will lead down the slope to the city-owned open space at the adjacent parcel to the north. The property's size and shape are suitable for a pocket park. The minimal impacts from the proposed improvements to the site can be accommodated by the site's size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. This standard is met. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and As described in the applicant's impact study in Section 3 of their submittal, there is adequate capacity in the public facilities that serve the site. The frontage improvements along SW 74th Avenue and storm water facilities have already been constructed. The proposal does not require any sewer and/or water connections. This standard is met. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The proposed site is zoned R-4.5(PD). Table 18.510.2 includes development standards in residential zones related to lot size, width, coverage, and building setbacks, height, and landscape requirements. The table below compares the proposed dimensions with the applicable standards in the base zone and those standards for community recreation and park use in 18.330.050.B.5.. TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-4.3 Proposed Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 7,500 sq.fl. 10,890 sq.11. -Duplexes -Attached unit SENN POCKET PARK PAG1 4 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 50 tt 160 ft. -Duplex lots 90 tt. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - - Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. N/A -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. N/A -Side yard 5 ft. N/A -Rear yard 15 ft. N/A -Side or rear yard abutting more N/A restrictive zoning district -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. N/A Maximum Height 30 ft. N/A Minimum Landscape Requirement - - FINDING: As shown in the applicant's submittal and in the comparative table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying zoning district. Table 18.510 includes development standards in residential zones related to lot size, width, coverage, setbacks,height,and landscape requirements. As shown in the applicant's submittal and in the comparison table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying zoning district.This standard is met. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and Section 18.330.050.B.5 contains the following standards for Community Recreation and Parks: a. All building setbacks shall be a minimum of 30 feet from any property line; No buildings are proposed. This standard does not apply. b. There are no off-street parking requirements, except that five automobile parking spaces are required for a dog park or off-leash area with a fenced area of one acre or more, along with an approved parking plan for anticipated peak use periods. Off-site peak use or overspill parking shall require a signed agreement with the landowner providing the additional parking. Three automobile parking spaces are required for a dog park or off-leash area with a fenced area of less than one acre, along with an approved parking plan for anticipated peak use periods. Offsite peak use or overspill parking shall require a signed agreement with the landowner providing the additional parking. The proposed park is not a dog park; therefore, this standard does not apply. . 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. FINDING: The supplementary requirements that are applicable in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Site Parking and Loading; 18.780, Signs; 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and-18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. As reviewed below in this report, all supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of the code are either met or conditioned to be met. Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments. SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 5 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed park use is new development. Therefore, the applicable site development review criteria apply. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Section 18.360.090 provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following approval criteria are not applicable to the proposed park use: 18.360.090.0 (Exterior Elevations of residential buildings); 18.360.090.E (Privacy and Noise); 18.360.090.F (Shared outdoor area-Multifamily use); 18.360.090.G (Landfills adjacent to 100-year Floodplain); 18.360.090.H (Demarcation of public, semi- public and private spaces for crime prevention): 18.360.090.J (Public Transit); and 18.360.090.M (Provision for the Disabled). Approval criteria 18.360.090.A. (Street and Utility Standards); 18.360.090.D (Buffering, Screeningand Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.K (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.L (Drainage); are discussed elsewhere in this decision. The following are the applicable approval criteria of this section that are relevant to the proposed project: 090.A Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; The proposed project will be in compliance, or conditioned to comply,with all of the applicable requirements of Title 18 as reviewed in this report. 090.B.1. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. . The proposal does not include construction of any buildings. This standard does not apply. 090.B.2. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3. and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); (2) Pervious pavement; (3) Soil amendment; (4) Roof runoff controls; (5) Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; (6) Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; (7) Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. According to the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map," the subject site does include low value habitat areas. Surface water drainage patterns, identified in Section 18.810.100.A.3, are shown on the Existing Conditions Plan. According to the City Development Review Engineer, the subject site does not have any upstream drainage flows that pass through the site. Except for the small segment of concrete pathway and concrete edging around the playground, improvements are all pervious materials including woodchip surfaces. Stormwater will be allowed to sheet flow across the site. The proposal is designed to take advantage of the existing trees and vegetation resulting in approximately 92% of the site remaining pervious.This standard is met. 090.I. Crime prevention and safety: a.Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 6 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The proposed development plans were submitted to the Tigard Police Department for review. The Department commented on the proposal and had no objections. Most of the crime and safety standards relate to residential uses and areas having heavy pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The proposed park use is restricted to daytime activity and lighting is not applicable in this case. This standard is met. FINDING: According the analysis above, all of the applicable site development review standards have been satisfied. Access, Egress and Circulation (Chapter 18.705) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The applicant proposes a new park on the subject site. Therefore, the provisions of this chapter apply. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The applicant submitted a Site Development Plan, which shows the proposed pedestrian circulation. No streets, off-street parking or auto accessways are proposed. This standard is met. Required walkway location (18.705.030.F): On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed park use is a civic use. The applicant's Site Development Plan shows walkway connections between the street, SW 74th Avenue, the playground equipment area and the natural area located to the north and west of the proposed park. This standard is met. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. As described in the applicant's submittal, required walkways have already been constructed of concrete along SW 74th Avenue. Interior wood chip paths, which are designed to drain, are proposed to provide access to the natural area. These are not required paths. The park will be closed at dusk and therefore lighting is not provided on the interior. This standard is met. FINDING: According the analysis above, all of the applicable access, egress and circulation standards have been satisfied. Landscaping and Screening (18.745) SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 7 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,medium or large). The proposed Golden Desert Ash trees along SW 74th Avenue as shown on the Tree Canopy and Planting Plan of the submittal meet the street tree requirements. 18.745.050.A Buffering and Screening General provisions. 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. The proposed park improvements would enhance the pedestrian experience with improved trails through the park and landscaping to provide enhanced separation from surrounding uses including a residence to the south. No fences or hedges are proposed that would interfere with views from neighboring properties. This standard is met. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right- of-way,buffering,but not screening,shall be required as specified in the matrix. The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1.Therefore, the buffering and screening standards do not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable landscaping and screening standards have been satisfied. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765) Section 18.330.050.5.b for conditional uses includes the following parking standards for Community Recreation and Parks: There are no off-street parking requirements... The proposed use is a park which does not include a dog park. Therefore, no off-street parking is required. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. As shown in the Site Development Plan the location of the two proposed bicycle parking spaces would be visible from the street. This standard is met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 8 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and,when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. As shown in the Site Development Plan, the proposed bicycle parking will be located within a hard-surfaced area, approximately 6 feet by7 feet,near the entrance to the park along SW 74th Avenue. The U-shaped racks will be secured to the ground with concrete anchors. No structures or buildings proposed; therefore, bicycle parking will be uncovered. This standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Pursuant to Table 18.765.2, bicycle parking for parks is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet, or a minimum of two spaces. The applicant proposes two bicycle parking spaces. This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking standards have been satisfied. Signs (18.780) 18.780.130.A.4 includes Zoning District Regulations for the R-4.5 zone and stipulates that for nonresidential uses, one illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding six feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved under the site development review or conditional use process will be permitted. F'INDING: The subject zone is R-4.5 and the proposed use, Community Recreation/Park, is non- residential. As shown on the Site Development Plan, the applicant proposes a non- illuminated,wood, three-foot high freestanding sign eight square feet in size (2 feet by 4 feet). Therefore,the proposed sign meets the applicable sign regulations. Urban Forestry Plan (18.790): Urban Forestry Plan Requirements (18.790.030) A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; An Urban Forestry Plan prepared/approved by a certified arborist and tree risk assessor has been provided. 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual (UFM); The existing development site is being developed to accommodate a new public park. A tree preservation and removal plan was submitted identifying all trees proposed for preservation and five for removal. The plan meets the tree preservation and removal standards; this standard is met. SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 9 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and A Tree Canopy Site Plan was provided that identifies the canopy of existing and newly planted open grown trees and existing stands of trees. According to the supplemental report,no tree growth limiting soils were found on the site; so no limiting soils are identified-on the plan. The applicant's Urban Forestry Plan shows that the site meets the minimum effective canopy requirements. The project arborist has signed the Urban Forestry site plan and attested that the plan meets the tree canopy site plan standards. 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. A supplemental report was prepared by the project arborist,Morgan E. Holen;Morgan Holen& Associates, LLC. The report includes the required inventory data for the existing open grown trees and the existing stands of trees (UFM Section 10,Part 3,and Subsection D & E). Protection measures, consisting of a 5 foot metal fence secured to the ground located along the dripline of preserved trees shall be in place prior to any site work. Soil characteristics for the site are native soils that support the existing stands of primarily native trees and vegetation. The project arborist states that soil samples will be taken in the newly planted areas and used to determine the proper balance of soil amendments. The table below demonstrates the effective tree canopy in accordance with UFM Section 10,Part 3, and Subsection M). Because the site is zoned R-4.5, the required effective tree canopy is 40% for the entire site. According to the supplemental report, the effective canopy is as outlined below: Square feet of Percent of Canopy Canopy Lot 28 Existing canopy 0 0% Newly Planted Trees 7,245 149% Lot 29 Existing canopy 12,234 196% Newly Planted Trees 2,995 48% TOTAL CANOPY FOR 22,474 2020/o SITE The required canopy for the entire site is met. B. Tree canopy fee. If the supplemental report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets) or that the 15% effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for any individual lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent effective tree canopy cover), then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the tree canopy fee calculation requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. The site meets the canopy requirements; therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based upon the facts above, the Urban Forestry Plan standards have been satisfied. Urban Forestry Plan Implementation (18.790.060) C. Tree Establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030 A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of the previously approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the tree establishment requirements in Section 11, part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The applicant's proposal does not address tree establishment. However, as this is a City project, the condition of approval is added for the city to show that funds have been budgeted for the planting and establishment of the proposed trees. SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 10 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per Section 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per Section 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Section 11, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual states that prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. As this is a City project, the City's Public Works department will go out to collect and process the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. A condition of approval is added to provide the inventory data that meets the requirements of Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 3 prior to final building inspection. FINDING: Standards to implement the Urban Forestry Plan have not been fully satisfied but can be met as conditioned. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Chapter 18.810) Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Storm water runoff from the proposed park will drain to the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of the adjacent Ash Creek Estates project. The project will created less new impervious surface area (approximately 956 square feet) than the two houses originally planned for this site and for what the detention pipe was designed. Additional storm water detention is not required. This standard is met. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. SINN POCKET PARK PAGE 11 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC I TEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Stormwater treatment will occur as water flows down the vegetated slope from the project to the existing detention pipe. As proposed by the applicant, this standard is met. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control. An erosion control plan will be submitted with the site plans for the project. Site Permit Required: A site permit from the Building Division is required before any work begins on the site. An erosion control plan will be submitted as part of the application for the site permit. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and provided findings which are incorporated in this report. Recommended conditions are included in the conditions of approval. SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 12 OF 13 CUP20I3-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING SI'AFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services (CWS) has reviewed the proposal and submitted a Sensitive Area and Pre- Screening Site Assessment stating that the proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2); No site assessment or service provider letter is required. In addition, CWS provided a comment letter dated October 23, 2013, requiring a sewer and storm water connection permit prior to any work on site. This requirement is ensured through addition of conditions of approval to this decision. Tualatin Valley Water District reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Attachments Exhibit A: Development Review Engineering Comments, November 20, 2013 Exhibit B: Vicinity Map Exhibit C: Site Plan PREPARED BY: es Kowacz DATE Associate Planner -2/rl/3 REVIEWED BY: Tom McGuire DATE Assistant Community Development Director SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 13 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER EXHIBIT A 111 ' City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Agnes Kowacz, Associate Planner From: Mike McCarthy, Senior Project Enginee* Re: CUP 2013-03; Senn Park; 9868 SW 74th Ave Date: November 20, 2013 Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance, and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and/or AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility). The proposed site is accessed via SW 74th Ave at a location on the outside of the north end of a gentle horizontal curve where the roadway slopes to the north without any significant vertical curves. Buildings or other obstructions are set back far enough to be out of a driver's line of sight. The site access will only be used by maintenance vehicles, and a fence will physically prohibit private vehicle access. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 74th Ave is classified in the Tigard Transportation System Plan as a Neighborhood Route, and is not an Arterial or Collector. No access to the park will be provided for private vehicles. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. No accesses are proposed to arterial or collector streets, nor are any new local streets proposed. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.J includes minimum width requirements for accesses. No new accesses will be constructed, and the site will only be accessed by maintenance vehicles. This standard is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E, requires Neighborhood Routes to have a minimum 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot minimum paved section. Other improvements required include underground utilities, street lighting, and storm drainage. This site lies adjacent to SW 74th Ave, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The required right-of-way half-width is 27 feet. The application shows an existing right-of-way half-width of 27 feet, which exceeds the standard. The right-of-way width standard appears to be met. The existing paved street width is 32 feet plus curb, planter strip, street trees, and sidewalk in accordance with city standards. This standard is met. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Street connections through the subject property would need to cross existing wetlands, slopes, and/or conservation easements that would prohibit construction, so they are precluded by environmental constraints. Any street connection would need to cross existing creeks and wetlands or existing developed properties, and would be inconsistent with adopted city plans. This standard is met. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The proposed development would not generate a level of traffic that would justify considering revisions to the grade of 74th Ave. The city is not aware of any grade- related safety issues on 74th Ave along the frontage of the subject property. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The proposal does not include residences adjacent to an Arterial or Major Collector and does not include access to an Arterial or Major Collector. Traffic Study— Section 18.810.030.CC requires a traffic study if a development with primary access to a street with an average daily traffic volume of less than 3,000 would generate more than 2,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed development would not generate a level of traffic that would justify a traffic study. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.6.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. The block formed by 74th Ave, Barbara Ln, Ventura Dr/Ct, Locust St, 75th Ave, and Landau St does exceed 2,000 feet in length. Provision of smaller blocks is precluded by Ash Creek to the north of the site, wetlands, slopes, and pre-existing development south of the site. Section 18.810.040.6.2 states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connections are exempted by subsection 6.1. A pedestrian connection is proposed across the subject property. This standard is met. Utility Easements: 18.810.050.A states that easements for sewers, drainage, mater mains, electric lines, or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions. No easements are necessary because no new utilities are proposed with this application or necessary to serve the proposed development. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets, and on one side of local streets in commercial and industrial areas. There is an existing sidewalk that meets these standards along 74th Ave. The applicant proposes connecting this sidewalk to the street with an ADA-compliant ramp in accordance with city standards. It appears this standard will met with the applicant's proposal. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Sewer Plan approval: Section 18.810.090.6 requires that the applicant obtain City Engineer approval of all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is not proposing any restrooms, buildings, or anything else that would need sanitary sewer service. This requirement is not applicable. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. The majority of the park site is proposed to remain as pervious landscaping, resulting in very little additional stormwater leaving the site. Stormwater runoff from the proposed park will drain to the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of the adjacent Ash Creek Estates project. The proposed Senn Park will have less impervious area than the two houses originally proposed for this site. It appears this standard will be met with the applicant's planned stormwater provisions. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no known upstream drainage flows or issues that would necessitate provisions on this site. This standard appears to be met. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2007 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Stormwater runoff from the site will drain into the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of the adjacent Ash Creek Estates Project. The Senn Park project will create less new impervious surface (956sf) than the two houses originally planned for this site, and for which the detention pipe was designed. It appears this standard will be met with the applicant's planned stormwater provisions. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not I underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. The existing utility lines along 74th Ave are under ground. Any utilities serving the proposed park will be placed underground. It appears this standard will be met. Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant placement prior to issuance of the site permit. Public Water System: The Tualatin Valley Water District provides water service in this area. No water connections are proposed to this site, so no water-related issues are anticipated. If water service is needed, the applicant will need to meet TVWD's requirements for this service. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on- site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed in accordance with the CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management and shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Stormwater treatment will occur as water flows down the vegetated slope from the project to the existing detention pipe. It appears this standard will be met with construction of the proposed storm drainage system. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that may be needed for this project. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as applicable. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of permits. Survey Requirements The applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462 or mikem@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: The applicant shall provide approval from TVF&R for access and hydrant placement. An erosion control plan shall be provided. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION OF THE STREET OR STRUCTURES: Submit to the Engineering Department (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462 or mikem@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: All elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as transportation, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water, etc.) systems shall be in place and operational with accepted maintenance plans and certified by an engineer with expertise in that area prior to a final inspection of the street or structures. All new utilities serving the subject property shall be constructed underground. I \___i ►� Exhibit iMap BARBAp4 lb j CU P2013-00003 � Senn Park tho ...._p_...._..._._._.___________ ______ r__„...._, SHADY PL I ______ 4 u., \----\\\____, ASH CREEK CT d \ x I .,:,,... • 6: .. ••._______________ RED CEDAR WAY ••.•.•.' mi -IMF-111-1111F-t-I ir 1ir i VENTURA DR i i -MVO AIM i LANDAU ST ."�. .. .r. = - - Xa x IP 675a wli z 2 CNQI I i '� �' iil ----1/ y / 9 . � - 1I I, • • am ...uaa,a�"'w�•-�nean.o'.'Mr.+aa..` �ria� \ kk - --._ 1 ....s.; .i . V311V ar3H7w1L \ \ ,. / — x + F' � isi30VIp16 3NL3tldx311� `\ T• 1 / \ N. \ N. / } t `` ' "�Y'� ^ ' C AI m 44614OMI LIaGN _ , ':,7~tS.ili?N=fP�ilal1K}! ,i/ / / _ U .111, r3W 7N14M1 d00n1 117YV f,f. 13 • \ r .3DOi�etraw ,Nvareo,��. 1 '1 TMU,LW ' \ — 71kM oNww3li 3u�woo.oma __�` _ _. AVM/ 00 r \A':'""'-.- -7s ,.., ..... , •.... \11 �- 1 •.s �.s roe' .\ \ \\ \\ �p \ ''•,��: :ltr ...f.:. ��`l�Ei6A��.1l�1 �'_.DNIDr W0 \ \ \ :F t.?. iti:1:: :S:.t. bNrw \\\ `\ , 'A ::•: •�..i i i i i !I ': w ,,•f -` 03gi05' N7rIB,f \ \. ^sem` ^\\ \\ .;, 1°_ ..::tiJ:•::.....:r..:•::.e.1 �� • �� \\\\�-.- \. / -...,,,....:-.r...,/ ~\\ \ � • \\♦ , \ �y'v �' •0�. J( •* Q.�i�� (Old ll$tel.<.e. t • i}.� ' \ \ ...\ .t. • - (t)LY3QY10Q 3N�15 vc a v.....v......'(tf. • .. 11 li. J N. \ • y,_..,...-.........-...;‘,'- N01l3Y� L. \ .� i a �.� L.. m;m 1I ' r 110. N. \ \\--� \\ " /� /'�`\\ .• \\ \ —'--�\- VIII r �\ ` \ \ 1x1. _ \ / / /\\� \ \\ = \\\� li-, tf�F�[ . / /...../ \\ • \•••.'-';'•-• \ Yd31V c. OAbM 1 vaao Tp41Y33 I ‘\ ,:>„. \...... ......_... ...........tit_ ..?„4.(„.........,,,.,...;\ \• \ \\ .....,..t.,:..2.,..... . ••••••,...`,...,.....7...............,.....Z...L .., ci,,, .. i_ _............,_ . _p ___ , _ 6,,,,,..:: Ns, ,,,.... ,..,s,....,.....„. ...........-'" ....._, .....":„e'...:..'".,..."''4131;s7 .4.,,_, --.44.4..6,44,tz'.....„..,"":.„ N. \\i "..., • !3Nn sro TAMA%aNnoNoNaonn —D— \�• , — _ -- 1 \ \ -— �'`�, \ bt{ 11 I awn AL 3817 oa1011O330Nn — \` { 1 a j 303 x3U5M a0rwNaa3oHn =M\ �. _ •.— .,..— -- •� l \..-.. - — _ \, 1`,`+ �`�' 11 t ; 3041 3NOHd3'Ui QNn0tlOd3O111 —1— —_--- /1_ —• --S = -� .. )l H !`. 51\ \ ': _ r �} x I L 3Nn x3433 AW114VS awnoNceaann —1s— _w --._\ \ \ \ ( 1 \\ (__ — T ► rcatIm 3141 NMuo y 110JS o.n01K4130Nn —11— ^ \\\\ 1 .M3 3141 01113333 oNnoeoNaaMn —3— -—_ - \ \ \ \ 1 y 1 ! \ \ ,i + (TT NOLL1/Jal 0.001!111 al'1/00 3041 2— \ \\ \ \ \I!I i I! \\ \ '� ••�� — I Nni i 31000,114 Nivea mals 0 \\ \ \,\, I 1 �� t I 1 # ; 1 31ONM71 r3M3s AW1J NS `} N3S x3171 i13LM11 \ \ \ \{ `t ' `1\ \ _• _• �. NISVIa xva w� \\\\ \ 111111 1111, a I .1. 4 ta'3"' _ _s3unun oNtrsoo \ S. i\ \ 1111 11 1\ _^.� �;_ 101610114 e t if -"\- \ eU avow iNn A1x3taae ---- \\C\ \ \\ 1\�1\\\\1\11 1\\ l k :i; 4_,,ili +"1Mcnu1 sana3NOO norvll a3soda0d 3NfiUtL3'non mama \ \\\11\\ i‘, \\ \1 \ \\ \ _ • _g" ,3,,3 (3)sar1aw00 mil pi --—— N3011033M/UL oNaSM3 ® \`1 1\\\\0 301101/100 VONII1 11350d001 ` \ - —L I` a01M 34 IMO MUMS --nol avow \ \\\1 \ 1 \ -- / �� f � NISYB Na1V3 VAN Arid 0 HO0L3e oOOM wD1SnO I 430V 01001VId rd 1 \,1\\\1\\\\\`\\-- 1 ,,,I i *5. \\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\ I. 1 do, DNwdans AL33Vs saw aooM sroas dnlus 3301 06 0 \\\\\\\ '+`� ,}", T1VMlr33 3L3d:13DO 3dK150NY1 3401S \\ \\x\\\ \ \ \ \ 1I 1 A maeu HMI 313110003 HOIL313%Md ,,-,0 \``\; \ \\\\`\_ . _ '' - M 30033 VC (M .e HON3e d01d e \\\\\\,, ',V s`\,\ ,' I.' 115341 3144 0301341 1 �3 /r ,tea s 3TTV14303a /€4i . \1\ \\\\ \\\\ ._ '1..----1-----14 fx ON3031 NY1d 311s • Agenda Item: 1 Hearing Date: December 9,2013 Time:7:00PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = 7 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SENN POCKET PARK CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2013-00003 APPLICANT/ City of Tigard Parks Division APPLICANT'S Conservation Technix OWNER: Steve Martin REP: Steven Duh 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PO Box 12736 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland,OR 97212 PROPOSAL: The City is requesting approval for development of a new pocket park and trailhead at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The .25 acre site consists of two parcels and is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk, and planter strip. The proposal also includes an entry sign. LOCATION: The property is located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue;Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S125DC,Tax Lots 09500, 19600. ZONING: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780,18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use and Sign will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the applicable approval standards as outlined in Section VI of this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL,subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 1 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz, 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. 2. The project arborist shall perform twice monthly site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non- compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. 3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard the current Inventory Data Collection fee for urban forestry plan implementation. 4. Prior to final inspection, the application shall provide a tree establishment bond that meets the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11,Part 2. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 5. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue for access and hydrant placement. 6. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide an erosion control plan in conformance with the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates), for approval by Public Works Engineering. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Theapplicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 7. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall call for a final planning inspection to ensure the project was completed as shown on the approved plan. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements, to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 8. Prior to final inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure systems shall be in place and operation and have maintenance plans approved by Public Works and certified by an engineer with expertise in the relevant system. 9. All new utilities serving the site shall be placed underground. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 2 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The City is requesting approval for development of a new pocket park and trailhead at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The proposal includes a trailhead with hard and soft trails, a playground area, benches and bike racks. The property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk, and planter strip. The proposal also includes an entry sign. Site History: The subject site had previously been approved as part of the Ash Creek Estates subdivision, as Lot 28 and Lot 29. In July 2007, site was acquired by the City of Tigard for development of a pocket park.A search of city records for previous land use reviews on the subject property found land use case files ZON2003- 00003, SUB2003-00010, PDR2003-00004,VAR2003-00036 &VAR2013-00037. These permits were for a rezone to allow a Planned Development Overlay, an approval to subdivide 9.3 acres into 29 lots, sensitive lands review for drainage ways, and adjustments related to cul-de-sacs. Vicinity Information: The site is located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The site is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The property is otherwise zoned R-4.5,low density residential and is surrounded on all sides by the same zone. Neighbor Comments: The applicant held a formal neighborhood meeting on August 1, 2013 with 5 neighbors in attendance. There was general consensus from participants in favor of the park design. The City did not receive any public comments. SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification Chapter 18.130 lists the Use Categories used in the Development Code. The proposed park is considered a Community Recreation use and is permitted as a conditional use in the R-4.5 zone. Summary of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type IIIA procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A. Type IIIA procedures apply to quasi-judicial actions that predominantly apply discretionary approval criteria. Type IIIA actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Findings for these code sections are in Section VI of this report. A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.705 -Access Egress and Circulation 18.745 -Landscaping and Screening 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.780 - Signs 18.790 - Urban Forestry Plan 18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW AND APPROVAL CRITERIA AND SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 3 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FINDINGS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS AND APPROVAL CRITERIA Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. The applicant requests approval of a new park use on the subject site. The following standards in this chapter ensure the proposed development will not adversely impact surrounding uses and public facilities. 18.330.030.A Approval Standards The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; As described in the applicant's narrative, the .25 acre site is adequately sized to accommodate the needs of the proposed park. While the City of Tigard does not maintain minimum park size criteria, pocket parks similar to the one proposed are typically sited on properties ranging from .25 ot1.0 acres in size. This approval standard is met. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; The site contains a flat, upper shelf along the south side of the property near SW 74th Avenue. This flat area will provide sufficient space for the proposed small playground. A proposed wood chip pathway will lead down the slope to the city-owned open space at the adjacent parcel to the north. The property's size and shape are suitable for a pocket park. The minimal impacts from the proposed improvements to the site can be accommodated by the site's size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. This standard is met. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and As described in the applicant's impact study in Section 3 of their submittal, there is adequate capacity in the public facilities that serve the site. The frontage improvements along SW 74th Avenue and storm water facilities have already been constructed. The proposal does not require any sewer and/or water connections. This standard is met. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. The proposed site is zoned R-4.5(PD). Table 18.510.2 includes development standards in residential zones related to lot size, width, coverage, and building setbacks, height, and landscape requirements. The table below compares the proposed dimensions with the applicable standards in the base zone and those standards for community recreation and park use in 18.330.050.B.5.. TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-4.5 Proposed SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 4 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO'I'IIE I IEARINGS OFFICER Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 10,890 sq.ft. -Duplexes -Attached unit Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 50 ft. 160 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - - Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. N/A -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. N/A -Side yard 5 ft. N/A -Rear yard 15 ft. N/A -Side or rear yard abutting more N/A restrictive zoning district -Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. N/A Maximum Height 30 ft. N/A Minimum Landscape Requirement - - FINDING: As shown in the applicant's submittal and in the comparative table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying zoning district. Table 18.510 includes development standards in residential zones related to lot size, width, coverage, setbacks,height, and landscape requirements. As shown in the applicant's submittal and in the comparison table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying zoning district. This standard is met. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and Section 18.330.050.B.5 contains the following standards for Community Recreation and Parks: a.All building setbacks shall be a minimum of 30 feet from any property line; No buildings are proposed. This standard does not apply. b. There are no off-street parking requirements, except that five automobile parking spaces are required for a dog park or off-leash area with a fenced area of one acre or more, along with an approved parking plan for anticipated peak use periods. Off-site peak use or overspill parking shall require a signed agreement with the landowner providing the additional parking. Three automobile parking spaces are required for a dog park or off-leash area with a fenced area of less than one acre, along with an approved parking plan for anticipated peak use periods. Offsite peak use or overspill parking shall require a signed agreement with the landowner providing the additional parking. The proposed park is not a dog park; therefore, this standard does not apply. . 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. FINDING: The supplementary requirements that are applicable in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Site Parking and Loading; 18.780, Signs; 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. As reviewed below in this report, all supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of the code are either met or conditioned to be met. SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 5 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments. The proposed park use is new development. 'Therefore, the applicable site development review criteria apply. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Section 18.360.090 provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following approval criteria are not applicable to the proposed park use: 18.360.090.0 (Exterior Elevations of residential buildings); 18.360.090.E (Privacy and Noise); 18.360.090.F (Shared outdoor area-Multifamily use); 18.360.090.G (Landfills adjacent to 100-year Floodplain); 18.360.090.H (Demarcation of public, semi- public and private spaces for crime prevention): 18.360.090.1 (Public Transit); and 18.360.090.M (Provision for the Disabled). Approval criteria 18.360.090.A. (Street and Utility Standards); 18.360.090.D (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.K (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.L (Drainage); are discussed elsewhere in this decision. The following are the applicable approval criteria of this section that arc relevant to the proposed project: 090.A Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; The proposed project will be in compliance, or conditioned to comply,with all of the applicable requirements of Title 18 as reviewed in this report. 090.B.1. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. . The proposal does not include construction of any buildings. This standard does not apply. 090.B.2. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3. and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); (2) Pervious pavement; (3) Soil amendment; (4) Roof runoff controls; (5) Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; (6) Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; (7) Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. According to the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map," the subject site does include low value habitat areas. Surface water drainage patterns, identified in Section 18.810.100.A.3, are shown on the Existing Conditions Plan. According to the City Development Review Engineer, the subject site does not have any upstream drainage flows that pass through the site. Except for the small segment of concrete pathway and concrete edging around the playground, improvements are all pervious materials including woodchip surfaces. Stormwater will be allowed to sheet flow across the site. The proposal is designed to take advantage of the existing trees and vegetation resulting in approximately 92°% of the site remaining pervious. This standard is met. 090.I. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 6 OF 13 CU P2013-00003 12/9/203 PUBLIC HEARING Sl'.AFF REPORT TO'HIE I II _ARINGS OFFICER b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The proposed development plans were submitted to the Tigard Police Department for review. The Department commented on the proposal and had no objections. Most of the crime and safety standards relate to residential uses and areas having heavy pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The proposed park use is restricted to daytime activity and lighting is not applicable in this case.This standard is met. FINDING: According the analysis above, all of the applicable site development review standards have been satisfied. Access, Egress and Circulation (Chapter 18.705) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The applicant proposes a new park on the subject site. Therefore, the provisions of this chapter apply. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The applicant submitted a Site Development Plan, which shows the proposed pedestrian circulation. No streets, off-street parking or auto accessways are proposed. This standard is met. Required walkway location (18.705.030.F): On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The proposed park use is a civic use. The applicant's Site Development Plan shows walkway connections between the street, SW 74`h Avenue, the playground equipment area and the natural area located to the north and west of the proposed park. This standard is met. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. As described in the applicant's submittal, required walkways have already been constructed of concrete along SW 74th Avenue. Interior wood chip paths, which are designed to drain, are proposed to provide access to the natural area. These are not required paths. The park will be closed at dusk and therefore lighting is not provided on the interior. This standard is met. FINDING: According the analysis above, all of the applicable access, egress and circulation standards have been satisfied. SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 7 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Landscaping and Screening (18.745) Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small,medium or large). The proposed Golden Desert Ash trees along SW 74th Avenue as shown on the Tree Canopy and Planting Plan of the submittal meet the street tree requirements. 18.745.050.A Buffering and Screening General provisions. 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. The proposed park improvements would enhance the pedestrian experience with improved trails through the park and landscaping to provide enhanced separation from surrounding uses including a residence to the south. No fences or hedges are proposed that would interfere with views from neighboring properties. This standard is met. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right- of-way,buffering,but not screening,shall be required as specified in the matrix. The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1. Therefore, the buffering and screening standards do not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable landscaping and screening standards have been satisfied. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765) Section 18.330.050.5.b for conditional uses includes the following parking standards for Community Recreation and Parks: There are no off-street parking requirements... The proposed use is a park which does not include a dog park. Therefore, no off-street parking is required. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. As shown in the Site Development Plan the location of the two proposed bicycle parking spaces would be visible from the street. This standard is met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 8 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and,when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. As shown in the Site Development Plan, the proposed bicycle parking will belocated within a hard-surfaced area,approximately 6 feet by7 feet,near the entrance to the park along SW 74i Avenue. The U-shaped racks will be secured to the ground with concrete anchors. No structures or buildings proposed; therefore, bicycle parking will be uncovered. This standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Pursuant to Table 18.765.2, bicycle parking for parks is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet, or a minimum of two spaces. The applicant proposes two bicycle parking spaces. This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking standards have been satisfied. Signs (18.780) 18.780.130.A.4 includes Zoning District Regulations for the R-4.5 zone and stipulates that for nonresidential uses, one illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding six feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved under the site development review or conditional use process will be permitted. FINDING: The subject zone is R-4.5 and the proposed use, Community Recreation/Park, is non- residential. As shown on the Site Development Plan, the applicant proposes a non- illuminated,wood, three-foot high freestanding sign eight square feet in size (2 feet by 4 feet). Therefore, the proposed sign meets the applicable sign regulations. Urban Forestry Plan (18.790): Urban Forestry Plan Requirements (18.790.030) A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; :1n Urban Forestry Plan prepared/approved by a certified arborist and tree risk assessor has been provided. 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual (UFM); SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 9 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORrl'()THE HEARINGS OFFICER approval is added for the applicant to provide a tree establishment bond that meets the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 2. D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per Section 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per Section 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Section 11, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual states that prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. A condition of approval is added to provide an inventory fee that meets the requirements of Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 3. FINDING: Standards to implement the Urban Forestry Plan have not been fully satisfied but can be met as conditioned. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Chapter 18.810) Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Storm water runoff from the proposed park will drain to the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of the adjacent Ash Creek Estates project. The project will created less new impervious surface area (approximately 956 square feet) than the two houses originally planned for this site and for what the detention pipe was designed. Additional storm water detention is not required. This standard is met. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 11 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING ST. FF REPOR'1"1'0'1'HE HEARINGS OFFICER with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Stormwater treatment will occur as water flows down the vegetated slope from the project to the existing detention pipe. As proposed by the applicant, this standard is met. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control. An erosion control plan will be submitted with the site plans for the project. Site Permit Required: A site permit from the Building Division is required before any work begins on the site. An erosion control plan will be submitted as part of the application for the site permit. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and provided findings which are incorporated in this report. Recommended conditions are included in the conditions of approval. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services (CWS) has reviewed the proposal and submitted a Sensitive Area and Pre- Screening Site Assessment stating that the proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2); No site assessment or service provider letter is SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 12 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO TI IE HEARINGS OFFICER required. In addition, CWS provided a comment letter dated October 23, 2013, requiring a sewer and storm water connection permit prior to any work on site. This requirement is ensured through addition of conditions of approval to this decision. Tualatin Valley Water District reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Attachments Exhibit A: Development Review Engineering Comments,November 20,2013 Exhibit B: Vicinity Map Exhibit C: Site Plan 12-121 21)1� PREPARED BY: es Kowacz DATE • ssociate Planner /21/3 REVIEWED BY:- Tom Guire DATE Assistant Community Development Director SENN POCKET PARK PAGE 13 OF 13 CUP2013-00003 12/9/2013 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER MEETING RECORDS Depending on the number of people wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Hearing's Officer may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Hearing's Officer to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO.: 1 of 1 DATE: December 9, 2013 PAGE 1 OF 1 FILE NAME: SENN POCKET PARK CASE NOS.: CUP 2013-00003 IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE PROPONENT OF APPLICATION OPPONENT OF APPLICATION - (Speaking In Favor or Neutral)- - (Speaking Against)- Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. O 3 bs �� 5o3 boa ; 1k ►lam l9P` _ _ R7_ a3 I ►, � s� SO11 � 3� `I Name',Addres ,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. rs L2,74- 1e4(6 St) , C119ce rWa� 2q 11 Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,`Zip Code and Phone No. 1 - Name,Address,Zip nd Code aPhone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. � I December 8, 2013 City of Tigard Planning Division c/o Agnes Kowacz 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Conditional Use Permit(CUP)Application for Senn Pocket Park—CUP2013-00003 Dear Ms. Kowacz, We are writing to comment on the proposed Senn Pocket Park near Ash Creek off 74 Avenue. Fans of Fanno Creek is a local non-profit environmental organization with many members in the Tigard community. We have for many years, worked to protect and conserve our local natural resources including fish and wildlife and their habitats along Fanno Creek and its tributaries. Ash Creek is extremely important for a number of reasons including the diversity of habitats along its banks. The wetlands and steep forested slopes on either side of Ash Creek which makes up the greenspace in this area is extremely important for wildlife, including migratory songbirds, deer, beaver, and many other wildlife species. Our comments are as follows: • Proposal—page 3 of the Staff Report states at the top that the city is requesting approval for development of a pocket park and trailhead. However, under 18.330.030A2, it states that"A proposed wood chip pathway will lead down the slope to the city-owned open space at the adjacent parcel to the north". Looking through the application it is not clear if a trail is to be developed under this application,yet this "trail" is also depicted on the drawing on file, (see Site Development Plan drawing, dated 9/20/2013 in file). On this drawing it shows the trail going all the way down a steep slope through the vegetated corridor and possibly into the wetlands. Since there are no drawings in the application that depict where the vegetated corridor or wetlands or steep slopes are located, it is not possible to adequately comment on this application. Trails or pathways proposed to be built in any "Sensitive Lands" area need to be approved and thus need to be part of this application, need to be addressed under the correct development code, which is 18.790. • Sensitive Lands Review 18.775.020.B.3—Under this section of the code, the proposed trail or pathway would not be allowed, since it is within the vegetated corridor as defined by CWS design and construction standards. Unfortunately the application does not depict on any maps in the file where the vegetated corridor is located near Ash Creek, but we argue here that the public has a right to know where the trail is going to go through and hence a map depicting the stream, vegetated corridor, etc. should have been provided in the application for an an adequate review by the public. • 18.775.020.H—This section of the code prohibits any uses or development within mapped wildlife habitat areas(Tigard's significant habitat map)and hence that includes the proposed"path". Under TDC 18.775, mapped wildlife habitat areas are not listed as areas where development or uses are permitted. We argue here that the proposed pathway is located within a"Significant Habitat Area"on Tigard's significant habitat map. However, since again, there is no map, drawing, etc. that is included in the application that shows the significant habitat areas, it is impossible for the public to review this application adequately and the application should be denied. We do however, attach a copy of the Significant Habitat Areas Map that we printed from the city's website, which we believe does show that the location of the proposed pathway is in a Significant Habitat Area(see attached SHA map). In conclusion, while we support the proposed pocket park and play area, etc., we do not support the proposed trailhead and pathway that would severely compromise the natural area and create unneeded disturbance to the wildlife in this natural area. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application. Sincerely, Sue Beilke, Board member, Fans of Fanno Creek • - q TIGARD City of Tigard Date: December 10, 2013 To: Joe Turner, Hearings Officer From: Agnes Kowacz,Associate Planner Tom McGuire,Assistant Community Development Director RE: Significant Habitat Areas Code Interpretation The City of Tigard does not agree with the strict interpretation by the Hearings Officer of the sensitive lands regulations relating to the Significant Habitat Areas Map. The City disagrees based on the following two reasons: 1. The Significant Habitat Areas Map and amendments (CPA2006-00001 and DCA2006- 00004) were adopted to provide regulatory flexibly through the provision of incentives for developers that utilize habitat friendly practices in their development proposals. It was not the City's intention to adopt additional regulatory requirements for these areas. The staff report to Planning Commission in support of the amendments states (emphasis added): "The primary intent of the proposed changes is to encourage habitat-friendly development by implementing recommendations of the Tualatin Basin Fish&Wildlife Habitat Program in compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 5 and Metro's Nature in Neighborhoods Program (Title 13). Amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan (Volume I) and Community Development Code (Sections 18.360, 18.370, 18.705, 18.715, 18.765, 18.775, 18.810) in compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 5 and Metro Title 13 (Nature in Neighborhoods) to adopt the proposed Significant Habitat Areas Map and to implement the recommendations of the Tualatin Basin Fish &Wildlife Habitat Program aimed at encouraging the use of habitat-friendly development practices. The proposed amendments will not result in increased development restrictions but will give developers the option to take advantage of greater regulatory flexibility in exchange for the use of habitat- friendly practices. Amendments will remove barriers to, and provide code flexibility for, development that incorporates habitat-friendly techniques" (Page 3). "The proposed amendments will offer greater regulator flexibility to encourage developers to preserve significant habitat areas" located on their properties to the maximum extent possible. Habitat-friendly provisions would encourage the preservation of fish and wildlife habitat (including along stream corridors) by allowing reduction of minimum density requirements, adjustment to site dimensional and street improvement standards,and low impact development techniques" (Page 8). 2. Such a strict interpretation results in inconsistency with Metro's Title 13 and Statewide Goal 5. As stated above, the City's intent is to provide regulatory flexibility, and not additional 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov development restrictions. The City adopted an alternative approach that provides comparable protection measures for habitat areas as outlined in Metro's Title 13 requirements. This alternative approach,the Tualatin Basin Fish and Wildlife Habitat Program,was acknowledged by Metro as being consistent with Title 13.Applying the strict interpretation under Section 18.775.020.H to the Significant Habitat Areas results in a much greater level of development restriction than even the full implementation of Metro's Title 13 regulations would allow.The Metro Title 13 program was adopted as regional compliance with State Goal 5,Natural Resources. In accordance with the State Goal 5 Administrative Rules, Metro completed an inventory of regionally significant fish and wildlife habitat resources and completed an Economic,Social,Environmental, and Energy Analysis (ESEE) on these significant resources to determine the desired levels of resource protection and development restriction to carry out their regulatory program. Metro also created a Model Ordinance as one option for local jurisdictions to use to achieve compliance with Title 13. The significantly higher level of regulation required by this strict interpretation would likely put the City in violation of State Goal 5 because it is a much higher level of protection than Metro's program and model ordinance established. In order to enforce this level of protection under Goal 5 the city would have had to complete an ESEE analysis to justify that higher level of protection. If the City's intent was to provide more restrictive regulations, then an ESEE would have had to be completed to avoid being in violation of State Goal 5 requirements. In conclusion,it is evident by the legislative intent in the staff report and the potential for inconsistency with Metro's Title 13 and State Goal 5, that the adopted amendments and legislative intent relating to protection of the significant wildlife habitat areas was voluntary and incentive based only. City of Tigard Senn Park - Sensitive Lands - Habitat Map 7540 �� 7618 7600 7580/570 9635 707 7059 w 9640 9615.4 9620 7173 7151 7129 .." BARBARA LN 9655 7105 /t 7083, 9645 w 97Q0 9640 71 7162 a > 9651ral _______________j Q ., 0 9670 9720 9663 7130 7108r 7090 7072 7048 9711 7063718 - j 7261 SHADY PL 7556 7183 9134 7169 7157 1 1 72847272 7258 7230 77011 0417023 7143 71317105 7069 7206 7194 ASN CREEK C T 700! r 71727158 7136 7120 7094 7070 701; 9750 7540 9777 7144 7530 70567034 9810 _. p r 1 9840 752 Project Area M RED CEDAR WAY 9880 1 7516 986: "",012 7498 7466 7438 9887 1 w. 9900 1ii, 9895 .'4a 7185 I. CI- 9903 7225 _"J� 7165 7145 7125 7105_1 708517065 70.42/ ' 7025 700`. 9950 ......4 da 7505 VENTURA DR 15 Q 999 749117469 74339911 7 _j � 1 76a J w 7130 7100 7080 7050 '_ ` ' aNOAU ST > --- 7020 VASHIt,tt_ . :111111116.---1 � N� 100b5 75 75.817520 Q 7485 7453 N I in 10008 "til - ,4„2' i 74.31 ii r 732 "' Highest Value Habitat F ect 7280 1,;; 100 C 29C 31 1003 Moderate Value Habitat Ir 1'i' ' "` Lower Value Habitat Source: TigardMaps.com REQUEST FOR COMMENTS e City of Tigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 17.2013 TO: PD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz.Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: agneskatigard-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2013-00003 - SENN PARK - REQUEST: The City is requesting a Type III-Hearing Officer (HO) Conditional Use to approve development of a new pocket park. Senn Park is located on 2 parcels consisting of.25 acres located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. Bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east,SW 74th Avenue to the west,and a single family home to the south,the property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk and street trees. The intent of the proposed project is to develop Senn Park as a pocket park and trailhead. Public recreation improvements to this property will be limited to the southwest portion of the site. Improvements include the installation of a small playground and a wood chip trail to an adjacent 4.5 acre city-owned greenspace along Ash Creek. LOCATION: The property is located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S125DC, Lots 9500, 9600. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390,Procedures; 18.510,Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705,Access Egress and Circulation; 18.725,Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading; 18.775, Sensitive Lands Review;18.780,Signs;18.790,Urban Forestry;18.795,Visual Clearance;18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY OCTOBER 31, 2013. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLFASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: J1M \ Dlc 50-5 Name&Number of Person(s) Commenting: a � s www.tvfr.com Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue November 19, 2013 Agnes Kowacz 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR, 97223 Re: Senn Park CUP2013-00003 Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue has no objections to this proposal. If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at 503-259-1504. Sincerely, d.fLyt fatY, John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal Copy: TVF&R File North Operating Center Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center 20665 SW Blanton Street and Central Operating Center 7401 SW Washo Court 12400 SW Tonquin Road Aloha,Oregon 97007-1042 11945 SW 70th Avenue Tualatin,Oregon 97062-8350 Sherwood,Oregon 97140-9734 503-259-1400 Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196 503-259-1500 503-259-1600 503-649-8577 10/23/2013 06:11 FAX 5035910986 TVWD Engineering Z001/001 To RECEIVED ' OCT 1 8 2013 City of T'./and TUALATIN VALLEY REQUEST FOR OMMENTS T I G A R D WATER DISTRICT rieatOt DA 1E.: October 17,2013 ' 5714 VA 'S TO: TVWD ?Ve.) FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: N.•es Kow.cz • '. - . 11 Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (5031 718-2748 Email:ascsk cytiQard-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2013-00003 - SENN PARK - REQUEST: The City is requesting a Type III-Hearing Officer (HO) Conditional Use to approve development of a new pocket park. Senn Park is located on 2 parcels consisting of.25 acres located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. Bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east,SW 74th Avenue to the west,and a single family home to the south,the property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk and street trees. The intent of the proposed project is to develop Senn Park as a pocket park and trailhead. Public recreation improvements to this property will be limited to the southwest portion of the site. Improvements include the installation of a small playground and a wood chip trail to an adjacent 4.5 acre city-owned greenspace along Ash Creek. LOCATION: The property is located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue;Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S125DC, Lots 9500, 9600. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review;18.390,Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705,Access Egress and Circulation;18.725,Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755,Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading; 18.775, Sensitive Lands Review;18.780,Signs; 18.790,Urban Forestry;18.795,Visual Clearance;18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY OCTOBER 31‘2013. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PSE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 1// We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter. — Written comments provided below — :- 1-'14.4-4- 1Le*c c-�/ t >✓' (( :tC.e�/ !072.2-2�! S Name&Number of Person(g) Commentin�j /( -_ CleanWWater Services MEMORANDUM Date: October 23,2013 To: Agnes Kowacz, Associate Planner, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphreys,�Clean Water Services(the District) Subject: Senn Park, CUP 2013-00003, 1S125DC09500, 09600 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE A Clean Water Services (the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed one-acre of disturbance,project will require a 1200-CN Erosion Control Permit. c. Detailed plans showing the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4. e. If use of an existing offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District, prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. " City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Agnes Kowacz, Associate Planner From: Mike McCarthy, Senior Project Enginee* Re: CUP 2013-03; Senn Park; 9868 SW 74th Ave Date: November 20, 2013 Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance, and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and/or AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility). The proposed site is accessed via SW 74th Ave at a location on the outside of the north end of a gentle horizontal curve where the roadway slopes to the north without any significant vertical curves. Buildings or other obstructions are set back far enough to be out of a driver's line of sight. The site access will only be used by maintenance vehicles, and a fence will physically prohibit private vehicle access. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 74th Ave is classified in the Tigard Transportation System Plan as a Neighborhood Route, and is not an Arterial or Collector. No access to the park will be provided for private vehicles. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. No accesses are proposed to arterial or collector streets, nor are any new local streets proposed. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.J includes minimum width requirements for accesses. No new accesses will be constructed, and the site will only be accessed by maintenance vehicles. This standard is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E, requires Neighborhood Routes to have a minimum 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot minimum paved section. Other improvements required include underground utilities, street lighting, and storm drainage. This site lies adjacent to SW 74th Ave, which is classified as a Neighborhood Route in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The required right-of-way half-width is 27 feet. The application shows an existing right-of-way half-width of 27 feet, which exceeds the standard. The right-of-way width standard appears to be met. The existing paved street width is 32 feet plus curb, planter strip, street trees, and sidewalk in accordance with city standards. This standard is met. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Street connections through the subject property would need to cross existing wetlands, slopes, and/or conservation easements that would prohibit construction, so they are precluded by environmental constraints. Any street connection would need to cross existing creeks and wetlands or existing developed properties, and would be inconsistent with adopted city plans. This standard is met. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The proposed development would not generate a level of traffic that would justify considering revisions to the grade of 74th Ave. The city is not aware of any grade- related safety issues on 74th Ave along the frontage of the subject property. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The proposal does not include residences adjacent to an Arterial or Major Collector and does not include access to an Arterial or Major Collector. Traffic Study — Section 18.810.030.CC requires a traffic study if a development with primary access to a street with an average daily traffic volume of less than 3,000 would generate more than 2,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed development would not generate a level of traffic that would justify a traffic study. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.6.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. The block formed by 74th Ave, Barbara Ln, Ventura Dr/Ct, Locust St, 75th Ave, and Landau St does exceed 2,000 feet in length. Provision of smaller blocks is precluded by Ash Creek to the north of the site, wetlands, slopes, and pre-existing development south of the site. Section 18.810.040.6.2 states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connections are exempted by subsection B.1. A pedestrian connection is proposed across the subject property. This standard is met. Utility Easements: 18.810.050.A states that easements for sewers, drainage, mater mains, electric lines, or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions. No easements are necessary because no new utilities are proposed with this application or necessary to serve the proposed development. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets, and on one side of local streets in commercial and industrial areas. There is an existing sidewalk that meets these standards along 74th Ave. The applicant proposes connecting this sidewalk to the street with an ADA-compliant ramp in accordance with city standards. It appears this standard will met with the applicant's proposal. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Sewer Plan approval: Section 18.810.090.6 requires that the applicant obtain City Engineer approval of all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is not proposing any restrooms, buildings, or anything else that would need sanitary sewer service. This requirement is not applicable. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. The majority of the park site is proposed to remain as pervious landscaping, resulting in very little additional stormwater leaving the site. Stormwater runoff from the proposed park will drain to the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of the adjacent Ash Creek Estates project. The proposed Senn Park will have less impervious area than the two houses originally proposed for this site. It appears this standard will be met with the applicant's planned stormwater provisions. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no known upstream drainage flows or issues that would necessitate provisions on this site. This standard appears to be met. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2007 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Stormwater runoff from the site will drain into the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of the adjacent Ash Creek Estates Project. The Senn Park project will create less new impervious surface (956sf) than the two houses originally planned for this site, and for which the detention pipe was designed. It appears this standard will be met with the applicant's planned stormwater provisions. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. The existing utility lines along 74th Ave are under ground. Any utilities serving the proposed park will be placed underground. It appears this standard will be met. Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant placement prior to issuance of the site permit. Public Water System: The Tualatin Valley Water District provides water service in this area. No water connections are proposed to this site, so no water-related issues are anticipated. If water service is needed, the applicant will need to meet TVWD's requirements for this service. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on- site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed in accordance with the CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management and shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Stormwater treatment will occur as water flows down the vegetated slope from the project to the existing detention pipe. It appears this standard will be met with construction of the proposed storm drainage system. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that may be needed for this project. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as applicable. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of permits. Survey Requirements The applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462 or mikem@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: The applicant shall provide approval from TVF&R for access and hydrant placement. An erosion control plan shall be provided. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION OF THE STREET OR STRUCTURES: Submit to the Engineering Department (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462 or mikem@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: All elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as transportation, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water, etc.) systems shall be in place and operational with accepted maintenance plans and certified by an engineer with expertise in that area prior to a final inspection of the street or structures. All new utilities serving the subject property shall be constructed underground. City of Tigard T I GAR D REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 17,2013 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: agnesk(a,tigard-or.gov CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2013-00003 - SENN PARK - REQUEST: The City is requesting a Type III-Hearing Officer (HO) Conditional Use to approve development of a new pocket park. Senn Park is located on 2 parcels consisting of.25 acres located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. Bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east,SW 74th Avenue to the west,and a single family home to the south,the property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk and street trees. The intent of the proposed project is to develop Senn Park as a pocket park and trailhead. Public recreation improvements to this property will be limited to the southwest portion of the site. Improvements include the installation of a small playground and a wood chip trail to an adjacent 4.5 acre city-owned greenspace along Ash Creek. LOCATION: The property is located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S125DC, Lots 9500, 9600. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390,Procedures;18.510,Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705,Access Egress and Circulation; 18.725,Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading; 18.775, Sensitive Lands Review;18.780,Signs;18.790,Urban Forestry;18.795,Visual Clearance;18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY OCTOBER 31, 2013. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person(s) Commenting: CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4 NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS: cupx)(3-occo3 FILE NAME: hn Pir le-- ✓Place a checkmark in the block to the left of the name of each person or organization that needs to be notified. CITY OFFICES C.D.Administration/Kenny Asher,CD Director C.D.Administration/Tom McGuire,Asst CD Director City Administration/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder Development Services/Planning-Engineering Techs. ‘./ Development Services/Development Eng.Mike McCarthy(Copy on all Notices of Decision) Development Services/Arborist ✓ Building Division/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official V Police Department/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer ✓ Public Works/Brian Rager,Asst PW Director Public Works/Karleen Aichele,Engineer Tech 1 Hearings Officer(2 sets) Planning Commission(12 sets) City Attorney File/Reference(2 sets) LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS City of Beaverton,Planning Manager,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Beaverton,Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Mgr,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Durham City Manager,17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd,Durham OR 97224* City of King City City Manager,15300 SW 116th Ave,King City OR 97224* City of Lake Oswego,Planning Director,POB 369,Lake Oswego OR 97034* City of Portland,Planning Bureau Director,1900 SW 4th Ave,Suite 4100,Portland OR 97201 City of Tualatin Planning Manager,18880 SW Martinazzi Ave,Tualatin OR 97062* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(ZCA-Adopted)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Only)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,0.Gerald Uba,PhD,(CPA/DCA/ZON)* ODOT,Rail Division,Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing Safety Specialist,555 13th Street NE,Suite 3,Salem OR 97301-4179(Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing is only access to land) ODOT,Region 1-Development Review Coordinator Carl Torland,Right-of-Way Section,123 NE Flanders,Portland OR 97209-4037(Vacations)* ODOT Region 1 Development Review Program,123 NW Flanders St,Portland OR 97209 OR Dept of Energy,Bonneville Power Administration,Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera,POB 3621,Portland OR 97208-3621(powerlines in area) OR Dept of Aviation,Tom Highland,Planning,3040 25th Street,SE,Salem OR 97310(monopole towers) OR Dept of Environmental Quality(DEQ),Regional Administrator,2020 SW Fourth Ave,Suite 400,Portland OR 97201-4987 (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) OR Dept of Fish&Wildlife,Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist,North Willamette Watershed District,18330 NW Sauvie Island Road,Portland OR 97231 OR Dept of Geo.&Mineral Ind.,800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5,Portland OR 97232 OR Dept of Land Conservation&Dev.,Mara Ulloa,635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150,Salem OR 97301-2540(Comp Plan Amendments&Measure 37) OR Division of State Lands,Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required),775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100,Salem OR 97301-1279 OR Parks and Rec Dept State Historic Preservation Office,725 Sumner St NE,Suite C,Salem OR 97301(Notify if property has HD overlay) OR Public Utilities Commission,550 Capitol Street NE,Salem OR 97310-1380 US Army Corps of Engineers,Kathryn Harris,Routing CENWP-OP-G,POB 2946,Portland OR 97208-2946(Maps and CWS letter only) Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency(WCCCA)"911",Dave Austin,POB 6375,Beaverton OR 97007-0375(monopole towers) Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Naomi Vogel-Beattie,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124(general apps)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Brent Curtis,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124(CPA)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Assessment&Taxation,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 9,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Doria Mateja,Cartography,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 14,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)* UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES Beaverton School District#48,Jennifer Garland,Demographics,16550 SW Merlo Rd,Beaverton OR 97006-5152 Century Link,Lynn Smith,Right-of-Way Manager,OR and SW WA,8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Portland OR 97219 Century Link,Attn: John Pfeifer,1600 7th Ave,4th Floor,Seattle,WA 98191-0000(proposed and approved Annexation notices) Century Link,Karen Stewart,Local Government Affairs Director,310 SW Park Ave,Portland OR 97205(proposed and approved Annexation notices) Clean Water Services,Development Services Department,David Schweitzer/SWM Program,2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy,Hillsboro OR 97123* Comcast Cable Corp.,Gerald Backhaus,14200 SW Brigadoon Court,Beaverton OR 97005(See map for area contact) IICURPLN/MASTERSIREQ FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 0813 13) Page 1 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES(continued) Comcast Cable Corp.,Alex Silantiev,9605 SW Nimbus Ave,Bldg 12,Beaverton OR 97008(See map for area contact) Metro Area Communications Commission(MACC),Fred Christ,15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1,Beaverton OR 97006-4886(annexations only) NW Natural Gas Company,Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord.,220 SW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-3991 Portland General Electric,Mike Hieb,Svc Design Consultant,9480 SW Boeckman Rd,Wilsonville OR 97070 Portland Western R/R,Burlington Northern/Sante Fe R/R,Oregon Electric R/R,(Burlington,Northern/Sante Fe R/R predecessor),Bruce Carswell,President and GM,200 Hawthorne Ave SE,Suite C320,Salem OR 97301-5294 Union Pacific Railroad,Director of Public Affairs,301 NE 2nd Ave,Portland OR 97232(currently the PA Dir is Brock Nelson,503-249-3079) Tigard/Tualatin School District#23J,Teri Brady,Administrative Offices,6960 SW Sandburg St,Tigard OR 97223-8039 Tigard Water District,POB 230281,Portland OR 97281-0281 Tualatin Hills Parks and Rec District,Planning Mgr,15707 SW Walker Rd,Beaverton OR 97006* X Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue,John Wolff,DeputyFire Marshall,11945 SW 70th Ave,Tigard OR 97223-9196* '< Tualatin Valley Water District,Administrative Office,1850 SW 170th Ave,Beaverton OR 97006* Tri-Met Transit Development,Ben Baldwin,Project Planner,710 NE Holladay St,Portland Or 97232(If project is within 1/4 mile of a transit route) Verizon,John Cousineau,OSP Network,4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd,Beaverton OR 97005 *Indicates automatic notification in compliance with intergovernmental agreement if within 500'of the subject property for any/all city projects(Porject Planner is Responsible for Indicating Parties to Notify) This document is password protected. Please see Chris or Doreen if you need updates.Thank you. If this roster is updated,please update the corresponding mailing labels at I/CURPLN/Request for Comments Notification Labels I/CURPLN/MASTERSIREO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 08 13 13) Page 2 of 2 PT ANNING SECRETARY MATERIALS • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Agnes Kowacz, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: {fleck Apprtrymam Box(s)Ikdcm i El NOTICE OF a TYPE IIIA Conditional Use Review FOR: CUP2013-00003, Senn Park ❑ AMENDED NOTICE— ▪ City of Tigard Planning Director x Tigard Hearings Officer Monday, December 9, 2013 ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,on November 14.2013,and deposited in the United States Mail on November 14,2013 postage prepaid. f// ud kg/04- i:: es Kowacz STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the�� day of tiKcv" ,2013. �++�•,� OFFICIAL SEAL � r CHRISTINE L.WILEY } (); `i NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ( ( COMMISSION NO.475306 ) NOTA P BLIC OF ORE ON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 03.20•17() My Commission Expires: • III ,1111 Notice of a Public Hearing — Type IIIA e Conditional Use Review TIGARD SENN PARK - Case ID: CUP2013-00003 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Thursday, November 14, 2013 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427 agnesk@tigard-or.gov Development is proposed in your neighborhood that requires a land use review. The Hearings Officer will conduct a public hearing beginning at 7:00 pm on Monday, December 09, 2013 in the Town Hall of the Tigard Civic Center at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Anyone wishing to present written testimony on this proposed action may do so by sending it in writing to Agnes Kowacz. We need to receive your written comments by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 28, 2013. Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: CUP2013-00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Agnes Kowacz.Anyone wishing to present oral testimony may do so at the hearing. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The City is requesting Type III-Hearings Officer (HO) Conditional Use approval for development of a new pocket park and trailhead at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The .25 acre site consists of two parcels and is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk,and street trees. Applicant: City of Tigard Steve Martin 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Owner 1: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Proposal Address: 9868 SW 74th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Legal WCTM 1S125DC Tax lots 09500,09600 Description: Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District (PD) City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 1 I/CURPLN/FORMS/Q1 Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12 EXHIBIT A • • Approval Criteria: Tigard Development Code 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705,Access Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745,Landscaping and Screening; 18.755,Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading; 18.775, Sensitive Lands Review; 18.780, Signs; 18.790, Urban Forestry; 18.795, Visual Clearance; 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. What You Should Know About This Type IIIA Proposal This proposal requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period or through oral testimony at the public hearing. The Community Development Department will be making a recommendation to the Hearings Officer on this proposal; our staff report and recommendation will be available for review at least seven days before the hearing. The final decision will be made by the Hearings Officer after consideration of the staff recommendation, relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period and at the hearing. The Hearings Officer's decision will be mailed to the applicant and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. Public Information Requests: A copy of the application, documents and evidence considered will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material at no cost, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Public Comment and Hearing Process Information The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Development Code, Chapter 18.390 and rules of procedure adopted by the Tigard City Council which are available online or by request at City Hall. At the hearing, the Hearings Officer will receive a staff report presentation from the city planner, open the public hearing and invite both oral and written testimony. The Hearings Officer may continue the public hearing into an additional meeting in order to obtain more information or may close the public hearing and take action on the application. If evidence in support of the application is submitted less than seven days prior to the public hearing, any party is entitled to request a continuance of the hearing. If there is no continuance granted at the hearing, any participant in attendance may request that the record remain for at least seven additional days after the hearing. Appeal Information Failure to raise any issue regarding this proposal, either in person or in writing prior to the close of the public hearing, or failure to provide testimony or sufficient evidence to allow the hearings officer to respond to the issue,precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.2 I/CURPLN/FORMS/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12 • • Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. Final Comment Deadline at 5 pm: Thursday, November 28, 2013 120 days = Friday, February 07,2014 Assistive Listening Devices and Interpreters: Assistive listening devices are available by request. The city will also endeavor to arrange for a qualified sign language and bilingual interpreters upon request. Please call 503-639-4171, extension 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD —Telecommunications Device for the Deaf). Please make these arrangements at least one week prior to the public hearing. Zoning Map BABA LN Zoning Map - ---- Cr mag I �-- __ -.. r' - ®Sublett Sete Jrump" Zang ClaR-I 3O abons R-1 30,000 Sq Ft Mn Lot Size SHADY PL C':l// J SJR-2 20.000 Sq Ft Mn Lot Sae i I 1R-3 5 10,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size 17777;:r7/17/72� •//�4'/'Y,// ,./ �//i•/// L_J R-4.57,500Sq Ft Mn Lot Size i __ - Min 5,000 Sq Ft n Lot See ASH CREEK CT 0-12 3050SgFtMin Lot Sae W --- R.25 1400Sq Ft Mn lot Sae > M e R-40 40 Us Per Acre Q R-4•5 NUR-1 Mood Use Resoonlod 1 R-4.5 F (PD) / NUR-2 Mo.Use Residentd 2 7 '--_, - MU-CBD Mn.d Use Central Bus Dal ---"--- ,.._-1 y -J CC Community Commercial —C-G Genn.Commercial iei.. C-N Neighborhood COMM RED CEDAR WAY ••••••4** MI C- Prolesuonal Commerce! eV.** V.ee.** i` C-17• eafe! *We-obeli:4i NUC NuW Use Commercial i e-e-e a 00000IIIMI MUC-t Mired Use C0000ercol 1 .ry MUE Meted Use Enpoloynent mss__ t\ Slued ood Use Employment 1 \ EM MUE-2 Memed Use Employment 2 .. \ 1 I \ I + al.Light lnduslral \ '-\-J L_- \\\111 I _ LP Induslnel Part VENTURA DR um 1-H Heavy Indufe.I _ 1 NAshngmn County I 1 - - 1 Overlay Ions r� ----I—_ / �- I V,../Historic District Overlay I LANDAU STr_-1_ Planned Development Overlay -- - MarN� I I �,. :o :Me:: 7. DATA a ow,.n.eou....n,.wc.s.le c.7.w„o..0 4 -__ N •0440,fCCIA CVarl.111 Of Wrc.,.« __ cernnrRocrnN xseaccsnam0nwunv�rr _- _ - A ! J \-',„ 40041707.FORAM[MOM we a w•c:uucu w.ie r^ - .— i r7. _-____ ... �- + ma dRgwtl e I Beet Hi repo ,91E salT. 9.s 0 125 2w Tema OR MO SO 6304171 .....11....11., City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13123 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 3 I/CURPLN/FORMS/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12 • • Site Map 41 gella k 1111 I , - : - ii I = E 8i is z� i3 :P� 11 § ii .11ili 11111.iiiii yli = i� eS t® I Film ! .''/'i i'i i i' --,--------<-:, .1- Fa l 1 1 1 i.F �////////' / / j I f / / '/////////l l�—J'/ / i / rl /l / / / 1 sfi '111//,/t/ / %//% / I 1 / / / / ' / / / 111 l� // /I I f / / / IIticI l 1 i 1 1 I1 1 1- //' ;_h`.1 t,J// J //J e i I ,, l`` _ I I 1 I 1111 , 1 11 1\ \1 \ r -"�'`� 1;i;+ I i ri /I i// // a g. / I i i\k \11 1 1 I//7 II Jfii 11,111 1 jiiiivi I � / � I11 ) \ \\\\\Art t y/ �:t`' 1 ;1; ' / i r r + \'\` `�\\\\\,%,._-__., i I . -i / l ill I \ \� \\ \� �\ �\\\�� I / / ; ro�iJ / ! ' I / I iii \ , \\ ��_ , \`11 i tJf'f, / �''t, / aM1 I ' ,- j /� 1 1111 IIIII \l' -.4.','71/1///// 'Ie l .'�.' + z i( I /I 1 1 1\0(..--4„...-",:////// :_ : - > / [rr4/ // / 1 till tl\(0.-:'� // // - , �/ / �iiiiii11. / ' sii / // 3 I 2- / �, �/�1 1'1 li'� I / / //civ . !n° /' j/ i'-' i'i,�1 r/I 1 t 1.ml l 1///// / r vf/ ` ' 1/ /' �� / J,/iii //I ///! 1: • / / ii��i'a��%! �'`_— i ---",.. //// J// �" .1111 . r II I /i i i /,,- �� _-— __.1� /! / s ., t \ 1 \ ,\ is i iii-ice% � it / a :i„ T 1 �1 --5--,--------;----- / z / 'f's.C.. ' ra, .1 0°. ridi \_ 11 f ,,A j i i , / j l 1 1 a Y. $ \I 1\ _ _ =_'�--1+--7. Oyu 1 ►iff.moi.�rll� r • 1 t 1 tt1 — — f'___�aic_ : — ic�ri■iiiiliiL�1iwommumil.=iiR�'-h. 1 'a —� I I t 1 �a r f L . 11� l! h w�w�r ri •o 1 nj II / 1! '! '-�-v --__�._ t t f d if I4 / 1 / ---*----...T.,___. Ij3 , -- • uu ,/ ' ; s \ • City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.4 I/CURPLN/FORMS/OJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12 • i 1 S125DC06500 1S125DC06400 ADAMS, KIM L CHANG, ROBERT HYUN 9670 SW SHADY PL 9663 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125D•�198.0 1S125CD06000 ASH CR STATES HOMEOWNERS ASS CHAPMAN, DAVID S FAMILY TRUST& 0000: CHAPMAN, MARICA L FAMILY TRUST 9840 SW LANDAU PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC09900 1S125DC01100 ASH CREEK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASS CLARK,WAYNE L 00000 7225 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC06600 1S125DC07000 ASH CREED GATES, THE OWNERS OF L CORYELL, TERRY P & DEBBIE D FAMI THROUGH 7 7157 SW ASH CREEK CT 00000 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125D606700 1S125DC05400 ASH CREEK GATES, THE OWNERS OF L COUVEAU, SUSAN 00000 7469 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD04200 1S125DCO2700 BACKARDJIEV,ALEXANDER& CRAWFORD, TERRY N LIVING TRUST& RUMIANA CRAWFORD, MARGARET K LIVING TRUST 7505 SW LANDAU 7100 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB00500 1S125DC07100 BOUDREAU, PETER& DARBY, CECELIA M BROWN-BOUDREAU, GRETCHEN BURROUGHS, DUANE A 7320 SW LANDAU 7143 SW ASHCREEK CT PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC08900 1S136AB04100 BURRY, MICHAEL C &JESSICA A DODSON, JEREMIAH A&ANGELA M 13643 SW 62ND AVE 10088 SW 72ND AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC05900 1S125DC06000 BUSH, CHRIS& BRENDA M DUFFY,ANGELICA V&SHAWN P 9640 SW SHADY PL 9651 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC00600 1S125C TO CHAMBERLIN,ALLEN LINLEY ELM ARK OWNERS OF LOTS 9777 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 EXHIBIT B • • 1S125DC09400 1S136AB00701 EUBANKS, DAVID & LESLIE HOPEWELL, ROBERT J JR &HELENA 7284 SW SHADY PL 10095 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136AB06100 1S125DC09000 FITZGERALD, NEAL J &CALISTA L HOUCK, JAMES MICHAEL&GAIL M 7453 SW GORDANA CT 7206 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CD08900 1S125DC05500 GILMORE, BRUCE J &CATHERINE HRISTESCU, GEORGE& OANA 7524 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7491 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC01500 1S136AB00401 GONDEK, CORY R IRVIN, DARRELL B& PATSY S 7145 SW VENTURA DR 7280 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC05300 1S125CD08800 GURRY, MICHAEL J & SHARON E JACKSON WOODS LLC 7433 SW LANDAU ST 7501 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DC09300 1S125CD09200 HANEY, FRED W JACKSON WOODS, THE OWNERS OF LOT CAMPAGNA, REGINA R 00000 7272 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB06000 1S125DC00500 HARDINGE LIVING TRUST JEFFS, JERRY L& PAUL I BY HAL W& KRISTEN J HARDINGE TRS 9655 SW 74TH AVE 7431 SW GORDANA CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB00200 1S125DC06900 HARRINGTON, CLAYTON&TERESA JOERGER, JAMES H &CATHY J 10006 SW 72ND AVE 7169 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB00700 1S125DCO2900 HARRIS, CRAIG W JOHNSTON, MICHAEL R& MARY ELLEN REED, TARA M 7160 SW VENTURA DR 7211 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DC01200 1S125DC04700 HOBBS, RONALD E AND JUNE E JOHNSTON,MICHAEL R& MARY ELLEN 7205 SW VENTURA DR 7160 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 • 1S136AB00600 1S125DC08400 KOHLMAN, BRIAN H & SHAUNNA L NAGY, BRENT J & CHRIS 7307 SW LOCUST ST 15877 SW CENTURY DR PORTLAND OR 97223 SHERWOOD OR 97140 1S125DC05200 1S136AB00201 LEAHY, BRIAN W&AMY NEWELL, CHRISTOPHER T&RHONDA E 9911 SW 74TH AVE 10060 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC05600 1S125DC08800 LEET, BRIAN L&ANGELA K PATTON,ANDREW & MELINDA 7498 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7172 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 1S136AB06300 1S125DC01700 MAJESTIC WOODS OWNERS OF PETERSON, TRENT LOTS 4-8 CULBERTSON, SHERI 00000 7105 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD04105 1S125DC06300 MANDAVILLE, JON E &DIANE M PHILLIPS, VALI REVOCABLE LIVING 9880 SW LANDAU PL KWAK REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST TIGARD OR 97223 7261 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC04900 1S125 10100 MINNICK, STEVEN A PHILLIP VA EVOCABLE LIVING BRAATEN, JANE L KWAK RE CABLE LIVING TRUST 9887 SW 74TH AVE 7261 SW SH Y PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC09100 1S125DC05000 MONTANG,JOHN & LYNN PODD, KYLE A& JESSI K 7230 SW SHADY PL 9895 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136AB05900 1S125DC05100 MORAN,ANDREAS J POSNER,JACK LIVING TRUST 7440 SW GORDANA CT 19550 MONTAUK DR TIGARD OR 97223 SARATOGA CA 95070 1S125DC01800 1S125DC08600 MORSE, WILLIAM J & LOURENE J PRIEBE, DIANE WELTY& THOMAS A M 7085 SW VENTURA DR 7497 SW ALOMA WAY,#5 TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136AB00400 1S125DC08700 MULHEARN, FRANCIS X& CHERYL A RASMUSSEN, JANEL R A & BEN D 10055 SW 72ND AVE 7158 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 • • 1S125CD08600 1S125DCO2800 REMMICK, DELTON D SHERMAN, PATRICK J 7556 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7130 SW VENTURA DR PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC08500 1S136AB03700 RETZLAFF, DARYL &JULIE SILCOX, RICHARD L &BECKY A 7136 SW ASH CREEK CT 10005 SW 71ST PL TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DC05700 1S136AB06200 RICCI, JOHN CHRIS& DEANNA L SMITH, JEFFREY W & 7466 SW RED CEDAR WAY HUNNICUTT, GEOFFREY D TIGARD OR 97223 7485 SW GORDANA CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC06100 1S125DC09700 RIDGECREST CONSTRUCTION CO INC TIGARD, CITY OF 13565 SW TUALATIN-SHERWOOD RD 13125 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD09100 1S125DC09500 ROLAND, LAYNE D & STEFANIE L TIGARD, CITY OF 7502 SW RED CEDAR WAY 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DCO2600 1S125DC09600 RUSS, BRIAN N TIGARD, CITY OF 7080 SW VENTURA DR 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC06800 1S125DC05800 RYAN, DAIN M WALKER, MICHAEL&ALICIA GINDER, JULIE D 7438 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7183 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB03701 1S125DC09200 SANDER, LEO ROBERT REVOCABLE WALTHERS, KELLY K LIVING TRUST 7258 SW SHADY PL 10031 SW 71ST PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC00201 1S125DC01000 SCHMITT, PATRICK D& PATRICIA J WASHINGTON SQUARE ESTATES 9720 SW 74TH AVE LOT OWNERS TIGARD OR 97223 00000 • 1S125DC0 1S125DC00900 SCHMITT TRICK D&PATRICIA J WEBSTER, DENNIS R& PHYLLIS ANN 9720 SW 74TH AVE PO BOX 11229 TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97211 • • 1S125DCO1600 WHITFORD, ELEANOR A TRUST 7125 SW VENTURA DR PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CD08700 WILLIAMS, KEVIN C&AMY L 7548 SW RED CEDAR WAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC01900 WILLIAMS, KEVIN C &AMY L 7065 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC01300 WILSON, LEE 7185 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC10200 WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD09000 WITT, TARA M &TROY E 7516 SW RED CEDAR WAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC06200 YOUNGBLOOD, RYAN L YOUNGBLOOD, JENNIFER N 9700 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC01400 ZIEGLER, FREDERICK W AND BARBARA G 7165 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 • DON & DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list interested persons who requested notice 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE re:ANY development ANYWHERE in Tigaro. See Memo for File re: TIGARD OR 97223 Interested Parties Update,August 2012 BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER CPO 46 MAILING ADDRESS 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY, STE H, BOX 242 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND,CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS NOT* Don't mail the City of Tigard label 12195 SW 121ST AVE if there is already a label for City of Tigard TIGARD OR 97223 printed from the GIS labels list. /CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 • • ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL, CPO 4B CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST,STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING&BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 10300 SW 92ND AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 DAVID WALSH 10236 SW STUART COURT TIGARD OR 97223 SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON, CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD-WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OSU EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 DAVID KIMMEL VICTOR DEFILIPPIS 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201 13892 SW BRAYDON CT PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97224 /CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 ra -1 ._J .. SHADY Lh4 . J 0 x .,_J�M -1 LOLA t_N ,,i f �(<, 0 . all III 4 ER Ti M r I r -i _ �g ills 1m ►n -I--I -' J L.I J i J i an / PIZ 1111110411111=raj �.. J IIIINqiit J. -I —11 } � I�161 ......A.: „-. _..., , J ` --z-J .__,,=. 111eA Le —110 ! iIJftfl • '..� ..r d _ T I ;®pial _, _1 >L.,w.' ,• Q -� J 70 rFt P L 4 •N J - J ,I, a F L 0CIJ S T- S c �'-'i ^- _! J J J-Ij _ -,f ;A 2 Map printed at 10:50 AM on 17-Oct-13 ' y� -`S -A 3 I �.-I �_� i �' "'� J .- MAKES NO WARRANTY..REPRESENTATIOND FROM IMATIPLE COR GUARANTEE AS ES.THE CITY OF TO TIE ty a� 'ME CONATA PROVIDDEDHERES.11.1 WTR'COMPLETENESS TRSM ASSUMEOF NO '�^ ^^" ; 1 UASIUTY FOR ANY ERRORS OIRSSIONS.OR INACCURACIES IN IRE J "INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF NOW CAUSED. _ _I J JCity of Tigard J J -j C Feet 5CD r-t ,., �, J J ' I tIGARMgPs 'T a 9 i23d IN e . t www.IQardor.gov • TIL ARf • • a • wi • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE TIGARD City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 In the Matter of the Proposed Annexation of: Land Use File No.: CUP 2013-00003 Land Use File Name: SENN PARK I, Agnes Kowacz, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of'Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I personally posted notice of Public Hearing on the proposed Conditional Use Permit at the Tigard Public Library.Tigard City Hall and the Tigard Permit Center, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 20th day of November,2013. •/��. i1c Signature to Person Who Performed Posting (In the presence of the Notary) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the a\s day of C W(1-Mtr20 �fz' OFFICIAL SEAL O Ms s B L.W 306 /) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 03,2017 9 NOTARY PUBLIC OF 0 ON My Commission Expires:' Ij(1)_AI)AI/Sr Adin Spcci l iinplatcs...;Af6davii of Posting NOTICEF O PUBLIC HEARING The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday December 9, 2013 at 7:00 PM at the TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and the rules of procedure adopted by the Council and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.390. "'Testimony may be submitted in writing prior to or at the public hearing or verbally at the public hearing only. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter at some point prior to the close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision-maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeal based on that issue. Failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. A copy of the application and all documents and evidence submitted by or on behalf of the applicant and the applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing, and copies for all items can also be provided at a reasonable cost. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division (staff contact: Agnes Kowacz, Associate WPlanner) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223, by calling 503-718-2427, or by email to agnesk@tigard-or.gov. CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2013-00003 - SENN PARK — REQUEST: The City is requesting approval for development of a new pocket park and trailhead at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The .25 acre site consists of two parcels and is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk, and street trees. LOCATION: 9868 SW 74`h Avenue; WCTM 1S125DC Tax lots 09500, 09600. ZONE: R-4.5 (PD) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765, Off- Street Parking and Loading; 18.775, Sensitive Lands Review; 18.780, Signs; 18.790, Urban Forestry; 18.795, Visual Clearance; 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. ■BARBgRq 7� Exhibit Map • • I <y CUP2013 00003 II, Senn Park • 111111111111111111 SHADY PL 411111.11111111 NM > • d liftirtQljaaell1111114; 2 H RED CEDAR WAY Oi•Oi i'�. • VENTURA DR LANDAU ST ►�.a• 111 w ik a w O Q N 2 A J f a I __ ___ I 11.01441,*MEP 40 . ' , p lei f 4$ V 11141104.- . . 10 .,. ...,,..,,, IR 8'4 .E*E11 ria E*411104** E I i E If fir 11114ftirst t a 01 6. A if'-------1::-.•=.— i 4 110 1 ., .•:040074712,i1,1 ,,,,',.-,. z rnt. 416 , Publish 11/14/2013. TT1 1 868 • • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING !PI TIGARD I, Agnes Kowacz, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: pied Appnryinam liox(s)Wow) ❑X NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 2013-00003,Senn Park 0 AMENDED NOTICE A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,on January 2,2014,and deposited in the United States Mail on January 2,2014 postage prepaid. AIA V1/.14- gnes Kowacz STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on theday ofV.....4,1L-s--CLJ‘.._A-A ,2014. ._.--- --........---;-_,:-.,-, -..,-,--,--,.-,-_-_------,...:7 Qs ..0 ?JJ OFFICIAL SEAL rt .(r- CHRISTINE L WILEY /1 NOTAR PUBLIC OF GON 1/44:# NOTARY SION OREGON 1 My Commission Expires:o a Q3-az� 1 COMMISSION N0.475306 (( 4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 03,20171 120 DAYS: 2/7/204 • • DATE OF FILING: 12/30/2013 44 DATE MAILED: 1/2/2014 _ CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2013-00003 Case Name: SENN PARK Applicant's Name/Address: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard OR 97223 Owner's Name/Address: Same Address of Property: 9868 SW 74th Avenue.Tigard OR Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington Co.Tax Assessor's Map No. 1S125DC,Tax Lot 09500,09600. A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE. THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE,MA1'ERIAIS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES,THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 9, 2013 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: > The City is requesting a Conditional Use approval for development of a new pocket park and trailhead at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. The .25 acre site consists of two parcels and is bordered by a city-owned greenspace and Ash Creek to the north and east, SW 74th Avenue to the west, and a single-family home to the south. The property contains a small open space area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk, and planter strip. At the duly noticed public hearing on December 9, 2013 the Hearings Officer approved the Conditional Use subject to conditions of approval. Zones: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Action: > 0 Approval as Requested ❑x Approval Subject to Conditions 0 Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: ❑x Owners of Record within the Required Distance O Affected Government Agencies ❑x Interested Parties O The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard Permit Center at City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 2, 2014 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 17, 2014 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. �— THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 16,-201 -1 Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at 503.718.2421. EXHIBIT A \ I 1 rI l Exhibit Map r BARBA/i.4 <4, / C U P2013-00003 Senn Park 1 ` Ab- SHADY PL I •im__ ASH CREEK CT Y/' Q \ r v N. ' J • / • •RED CEDAR WAY k1 Li N�►'� 41, . VENTURA DR • LANDAU ST 1 .U • w > Q w z > z Q N = N. J F- a1 / in n. 1 ,moi ! 'Z) I f I ! l , r7 lift 'ON BENS Y3aY a131ilYYl - — \ \'\/ `\ \\\ \..../... ..r / / / — — 1 _N I ---� NYId 3oIMo6S 3N1321d217Y` \ / — �+c++ ••+�^ "w.�S--� I ^w+• ^+�rl. S'�NVA L313YM0 OMf 111�iN \ 9Z..01 30..1143 NUd \\ \\ '/ // 1 i• , 30 311S (>a)staou dwnu 3113 SY3 S5 \ N3w3 " \ ,31y11B ONUYNS, NYd +/ 3L0133NS Y3tM TS)LLsi of NOM vu \ \ 11Ytl1 1 �. \_- '' T •ONINfvl3a 3131101p0,AI ( 1— _J _ • AVM3AIi - - f iii..�a.� 4 ^ corm NYdwoN ypadp3l �' •YAolwt3dls NVdllp� i t .1 ams \ \ \ \1 \ �\ . L \ \\ \\ �— N'mow= - „ \ 'ma'��. cc__ �'� •'` ;ON OM _ :••rr...: - x,44' :...: ��L1 oa3Na3tu \\\ �� \� IN 9--— \\\\ ; ■na�� •a■ ;„....,-40 i�Milli Ionto MNone i , IO 1103 I0N I \ \ \ ` `�`:_-——. -_ ^\\ r\\ \\ ..:..::...‘.; ,5, `"do- ••.,,,- .• .... .....'• •.r imiuk (3)HDN0 Y XI CINY1 \\\ — .�_.�,1-_ \\ "•. .•:• - n Ai ,� :�N M1�1 Noun.9 \ —— —— —— �•::: .v:::::•:�?"• fol)�s 11313 ' CIO ill �... \\ \--—••-.. \. = �� —-- �\ ."" w' \ `_ 4` �' • J • ky IW_fllFm,ll \ • • \\\ _\i i //�, 'siaro 31010N.•� \\�` �., �'"��idll nen] �z (i • ce ,� �• iii, 1.11 \ \�— \ `lI/�`ti___i f/ \14 .�' N. \`'Ml `�\v.ym,zrnr.i:.rncn+�w+vxor. �II XNN3•• oNI \ \ \ 11 \ i - i\\� \ \ =\ ▪ \ 1\ ,••• 41 3�#a jt ( } 1 • - _/ i �.\ \ — —._ L 1 v3aY "AVM Vd J &WIC \ \\ \ / (-- - '��.``, / // / \\\ - \1 -—Mr f I I ! — ..c , 31 M �- \ \ \ ^� 1, ,iii —\\��ti� 1 , - b MS \\` \\' ---i'~\� jam\ \ \ \\_�''.' ��\\ L\ -- / \\\\\ ��— _-- iii \ \\ \.` -▪``� '\ \\ �', ~r OIOISLV3 �.\ \\�\ i -- -- .-- i`\ i' -_,...,`.'.. -44.44.... s. \ 1i 11 f j 3Kl SYJ L MIND ONfl021O33aEfl —o.I.— .... `_ — �, , \`- —_"--- --.... ."::*----V L\ l.,t l..4e e.', r `` , 1 3Nf1 AL 3leYO aN00210330ln —AL— \ _-/ 1- t \ i 3Nn 2131W3 aNn0002flaNn —M— \ _—----—_- /.1 t `:� �: \-C .i 1 I 1 r� \ ('1 I —_ 1 .- 3Nn 3NOHd3B1 ONna11od30Nf1 —1— — ——--— — \ )l I 3N'I 331435 LIV11NV5 ONfloaDa3ONn —es-- -- - _ — —.-s-`\ \\\\\ 1 ' a I 3fil NNW mos ONOONOW30Nn —IN— j kms 3Nn 01=313 ONOONotOONn —3— 1 -—^ l ^\ \\ \\\\ I i 1{ t\ }\ \ • ,.I I ff It NO1IY)O1 wpwxn OL-LIDO 3Nn 2— \ \ \ \ 1 t t 1 I i \ \ — Val. 3IOHNYw NVaa NLO15 0 - �- ^- \\ \ \ \ t i� ` \ R-111 1 1 f 310141 VA 331435 unL1Ns 13 \ \\\ \ } 1 1`1 C \ \ 1 �` �I,� —�_y I -J. N3S 1131311 2131Y14 . \ 1 1 l \\` \ I 3A1VA 3121WA 0 % \ \ \ ,111\\\141\\ a '• ! i 31�0dAJJ1Wl .a, \ } 4\ \1 \ \\\ I a! 111V 53NOW1 oNLLSOG \ \ \ 11 \\\\ ,1 1 1 \ I _W— /i .o"c 3NnLclrosv3 \\\141\\\\11\141 1\11 \i! ��1 JII V i 3NI1 kLl 3dOtld ---- \ \1\`y\ \ \ }} w • I A a I 0011 S11nO1NO3 210141 W80dOtld— — \ \\ \\\ \\ \ \\ II MI 0611. 521nolNoo 2101VIN m9Dd0ad 3NILIX1d lion DNus7a - \ .••`1 \ \ \ \' y I oN1aa (3)slvlolrao NON% ® \\\\\\1\,\\\\\\ \ 11 —i�`� (3) iilnOlNOO 110NIN———.... L ONIISDC3 i.. cMSSIt 3dk1 WHO Rd=———— Y3W1 DNONYId Yd \ \ \\ \\\\`\ \ -� : ``1 ,A01 luoviy1 (MOW NI5V9 HaLYJ MY AYId 0 HaN3e 00014 woun 1 \\,\\\\\ ``\�\\ \\ _ i VQ7 oNIOVlaf1s A13lrs 21391! a00rN S'1oOls LI MILLS 33111 00�°0 \\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ r AY Arai] 11 .LY3s 31333NOO �'•� 3drJSOI v1�3 cnnoe '�% \�\\\\\\\\\\\ `\ I\ --.----1—4 T fl i _ liNd 313NON0, ED HON38 11Wd = \\\ ,\\\\\\ \\\ \\ \ ' r� his LLLO 3ONii win NNH3€ HaN3e dole \\\\\\\\\\\\\1 1.154 y ID H5331 33131 a�13r L130321 \\\ \\ \ \ \ I } •T /14 3013N lM21 Lids 37aV H5Y111 c \\\\�}!`\\1 1 1\` f { NLYd lq5 MIs'd0.IWI — ' — — 1 CN3031 NYId 311S • • 1 S125DC06500 1S125DC06400 ADAMS, KIM L CHANG, ROBERT HYUN 9670 SW SHADY PL 9663 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DG09800 1 S 12 5C D06000 ASH CREEk•ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASS CHAPMAN, DAVID S FAMILY TRUST& 0000 CHAPMAN, MARICA L FAMILY TRUST 9840 SW LANDAU PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S125 09900 1S125DC01100 ASHD (ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASS CLARK,WAYNE L 00 0 7225 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC06600 1S125DC07000 ASH CREED GATES, THE OWNERS OF L CORYELL, TERRY P& DEBBIE D FAMI THROUGH 7 7157 SW ASH CREEK CT 00000 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC 700 1S125DC05400 ASH CRE GATES, THE OWNERS OF L COUVEAU, SUSAN 0000 7469 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD04200 1S125DCO2700 BACKARDJIEV,ALEXANDER& CRAWFORD, TERRY N LIVING TRUST& RUMIANA CRAWFORD, MARGARET K LIVING TRUST 7505 SW LANDAU 7100 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB00500 1S125DC07100 BOUDREAU, PETER& DARBY, CECELIA M BROWN-BOUDREAU, GRETCHEN BURROUGHS, DUANE A 7320 SW LANDAU 7143 SW ASHCREEK CT PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC08900 1S136AB04100 BURRY, MICHAEL C&JESSICA A DODSON, JEREMIAH A&ANGELA M 13643 SW 62ND AVE 10088 SW 72ND AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC05900 1S125DC06000 BUSH, CHRIS& BRENDA M DUFFY,ANGELICA V& SHAWN P 9640 SW SHADY PL 9651 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC00600 1S125CD07400 CHAMBERLIN,ALLEN LINLEY ELMWOOb PARK OWNERS OF LOTS 9777 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 EXHIBIT B • • 1S125DC09400 1S136AB00701 EUBANKS, DAVID& LESLIE HOPEWELL, ROBERT J JR&HELENA 7284 SW SHADY PL 10095 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136AB06100 1S125DC09000 FITZGERALD, NEAL J &CALISTA L HOUCK, JAMES MICHAEL& GAIL M 7453 SW GORDANA CT 7206 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CD08900 1S125DC05500 GILMORE, BRUCE J &CATHERINE HRISTESCU, GEORGE &OANA 7524 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7491 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC01500 1S136AB00401 GONDEK, CORY R IRVIN, DARRELL B&PATSY S 7145 SW VENTURA DR 7280 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S1250005300 1S125CD08800 GURRY, MICHAEL J & SHARON E JACKSON WOODS LLC 7433 SW LANDAU ST 7501 SW LANDAU ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DC09300 1S125C1309200 HANEY, FRED W JACKSON WOODS, THE OWNERS OF LOT CAMPAGNA, REGINA R 00000 7272 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB06000 1S125DC00500 HARDINGE LIVING TRUST JEFFS, JERRY L& PAUL I BY HAL W& KRISTEN J HARDINGE TRS 9655 SW 74TH AVE 7431 SW GORDANA CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB00200 1S125DC06900 HARRINGTON, CLAYTON &TERESA JOERGER, JAMES H &CATHY J 10006 SW 72ND AVE 7169 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB00700 1S125DCO2900 HARRIS, CRAIG W JOHNSTON, MICHAEL R& MARY ELLEN REED, TARA M 7160 SW VENTURA DR 7211 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DC01200 1S125DC04700 HOBBS, RONALD E AND JUNE E JOHNSTON, MICHAEL R& MARY ELLEN 7205 SW VENTURA DR 7160 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 . • 1S136AB00600 1S125DC08400 KOHLMAN, BRIAN H & SHAUNNA L NAGY, BRENT J & CHRIS 7307 SW LOCUST ST 15877 SW CENTURY DR PORTLAND OR 97223 SHERWOOD OR 97140 1S125DC05200 1S136AB00201 LEAHY, BRIAN W&AMY NEWELL, CHRISTOPHER T& RHONDA E 9911 SW 74TH AVE 10060 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC05600 1S125DC08800 LEET, BRIAN L&ANGELA K PATTON, ANDREW& MELINDA 7498 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7172 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 1S136AB06300 1S125DC01700 MAJESTIC WOODS OWNERS OF PETERSON, TRENT LOTS 4-8 CULBERTSON, SHERI 00000 7105 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD04105 1S125DC06300 MANDAVILLE, JON E& DIANE M PHILLIPS, VALI REVOCABLE LIVING 9880 SW LANDAU PL KWAK REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST TIGARD OR 97223 7261 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC04900 1 S125DC10100 MINNICK, STEVEN A PHILLIP VA) REVOCABLE LIVING BRAATEN,JANE L KWAK RE CABLE LIVING TRUST 9887 SW 74TH AVE 7261 SW SHADY PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC09100 1S125DC05000 MONTANG,JOHN & LYNN PODD, KYLE A&JESSI K 7230 SW SHADY PL 9895 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136AB05900 1S125DC05100 MORAN, ANDREAS J POSNER,JACK LIVING TRUST 7440 SW GORDANA CT 19550 MONTAUK DR TIGARD OR 97223 SARATOGA CA 95070 1S125DC01800 1S125DC08600 MORSE, WILLIAM J & LOURENE J PRIEBE, DIANE WELTY&THOMAS A M 7085 SW VENTURA DR 7497 SW ALOMA WAY,#5 TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136AB00400 1S125DC08700 MULHEARN, FRANCIS X& CHERYL A RASMUSSEN, JANEL R A&BEN D 10055 SW 72ND AVE 7158 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 i • 1S125CD08600 1S125DCO2800 REMMICK, DELTON D SHERMAN, PATRICK J 7556 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7130 SW VENTURA DR PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC08500 1S136AB03700 RETZLAFF, DARYL&JULIE SILCOX, RICHARD L &BECKY A 7136 SW ASH CREEK CT 10005 SW 71ST PL TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DC05700 1S136AB06200 RICCI, JOHN CHRIS& DEANNA L SMITH,JEFFREY W & 7466 SW RED CEDAR WAY HUNNICUTT, GEOFFREY D TIGARD OR 97223 7485 SW GORDANA CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC06100 1S125DC09700 RIDGECREST CONSTRUCTION CO INC TIGARD, CITY OF 13565 SW TUALATIN-SHERWOOD RD 13125 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD09100 1S125DC09500 ROLAND, LAYNE D& STEFANIE L TIGARD, CITY OF 7502 SW RED CEDAR WAY 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DCO2600 1S125DC09600 RUSS, BRIAN N TIGARD, CITY OF 7080 SW VENTURA DR 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S1250006800 1S125DC05800 RYAN, DAIN M WALKER, MICHAEL&ALICIA GINDER, JULIE D 7438 SW RED CEDAR WAY 7183 SW ASH CREEK CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136AB03701 1S125DC09200 SANDER, LEO ROBERT REVOCABLE WALTHERS, KELLY K LIVING TRUST 7258 SW SHADY PL 10031 SW 71ST PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC00201 1S125DC01000 SCHMITT, PATRICK D& PATRICIA J WASHINGTON SQUARE ESTATES 9720 SW 74TH AVE LOT OWNERS TIGARD OR 97223 00000 1S125DC 0 0 1S125DC00900 SCHMITT TRICK D&PATRICIA J WEBSTER, DENNIS R& PHYLLIS ANN 9720 SW 4TH AVE PO BOX 11229 TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97211 s 0 1S125DC01600 WHITFORD, ELEANOR A TRUST 7125 SW VENTURA DR PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CD08700 WILLIAMS, KEVIN C&AMY L 7548 SW RED CEDAR WAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC01900 WILLIAMS, KEVIN C &AMY L 7065 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC01300 WILSON, LEE 7185 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 IS125DC10200 WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CD09000 WITT, TARA M & TROY E 7516 SW RED CEDAR WAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DC06200 YOUNGBLOOD, RYAN L YOUNGBLOOD, JENNIFER N 9700 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1 S125DC01400 ZIEGLER, FREDERICK W AND BARBARA G 7165 SW VENTURA DR TIGARD OR 97223 • • DON & DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list interested persons who requested notice 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE re:ANY development ANYWHERE in Tigaro. See Memo for File re: TIGARD OR 97223 Interested Parties Update,August 2012 BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER CPO 4B MAILING ADDRESS 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY, STE H, BOX 242 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND,CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS NOT* Don't mail the City of Tigard label 12195 SW 12157 AVE if there is already a label for City of Tigard TIGARD OR 97223 printed from the GIS labels list. /CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 • • ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL, CPO 48 CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST,STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING& BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 10300 SW 92ND AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 DAVID WALSH 10236 SW STUART COURT TIGARD OR 97223 SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON, CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OSU EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 DAVID KIMMEL VICTOR DEFILIPPIS 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201 13892 SW BRAYDON CT PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97224 /CURPI N/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 APPLICANT MATERIALS RE VED III SEP 252013 CITY OF TIGARD lig q City of Tigard PLANNING/ENGINEERING e Land Use Permit Application PRE APP.HELD BY: TIGARD File# (UP2O Ij—[ �O?j Other Case# Date q(2s �p - I3 By P Receipt# - Fee 5 c'I 5')• "1 Date Complete 10I I v 113 TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(H) 0 Historic Overlay(II or III) 0 Site Development Review(II) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Home Occupation(II) 0 Subdivision(II or III) ®Conditional Use(III) 0 Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑Planned Development(III) 0 Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Downtown Design Review(II,III) 0 Sensitive Lands Review(II or III) NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if available) Senn Park-9868 SW 74th Avenue TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. 1S125DC, Lot s 09500&09600 •TOTAL SITE SIZE. ZONING CLASSIFICATION 0.25 ac R-4.5 APPLICANT* City of Tigard Parks Division MAILING ADDRESS/CrIY/STATE:/ZIP 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 503-718-2591 503-684-8840 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE.NO. Steve Martin, Parks&Street Manager 503-718-2583 E-MATT. Steve@tigard-or.gov PROPERTY OWNER,)DEI{D HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) City of Tigard MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 503-639-4171 503-684-7297 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL.SUMMARY(Please be specific) Conditional Use to approve development of a new pocket park and serving residents of north Tigard.Site improvements will include the installation of a playground and landscaping. • City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 • THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Prc� /4c . Owner's Signature D e Owner's Signature Date • Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date • City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT _- q 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 193609 - 10/22/2013 CASE NO, FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID CUP2013-00003 Conditional Use Permit-LRP 100-0000-43117 $765.00 CUP2013-00003 Conditional Use Permit 100-0000-43116 $5,186.00 Total: $5,951.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Journal Entry 310-04-2014 AKOWACZ 10/22/2013 $5,951.00 Payor: City of Tigard Total Payments: $5,951.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 tri Y • TIGARD City of Tigard October 10, 2013 Conservation Technix Attn: Steve Duh PO Box 12736 Portland, OR 97212 RE: Completeness—9868 SW 74th Avenue Case File No. CUP2013-00003 Senn Park Dear Mr. Duh: The City has received your application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP2013-00003) to construct site improvements to accommodate a new park, known as Senn Park. The development site is located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that your application was complete as of October 10th for the purpose of beginning the 120-day review period for a final decision. The formal comment and review process typically takes 4 to 6 weeks. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718- 2427. Sincerely, 1 .itria Agnes Kowacz Associate Planner cc: Steve Martin, City of Tigard Parks CUP20013-00003 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov CONSERVATION TECHNIX 16 October 2013 City of Tigard Planning Division c/o Agnes Krowacz 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Response to Completeness Letter dated 10/10/13: Semi Park Conditional Use Permit (CUP2013-00003) Dear Ms. Krowacz The applicant and the project team reviewed the Completeness Letter for the above stated project. The application materials have been modified slightly to address the comments you offered when we spoke, and the following edits have been made: Section 2: Proposed Development summary • The content of the fifth paragraph was revised to delete the reference to a picnic shelter.A shelter is not part of the current proposal,but may be added in a future phase. "Proposed Site Plan& Improvements:As noted above and as illustrated on the Site Development Plan, the planned future development of the site includes a trailhead for pedestrians, ahcltcr and a playground." Site Development Plan • A detail for the proposed pair of bike racks has been added to this drawing sheet. Urban Forestry Requirements • The Arborist Report, the Tree Removal Plan and the Planting/Canopy Plan include signature blocks from the certified arborist for the project.These did not come through on the initial printing due to an electronic file transfer error. • Although the proposed vine maples are not included in the City's list,the list is not intended to be all- inclusive. It is the professional opinion of the project arborist that they are the most appropriate species for the chosen locations.The vine maples will be understory trees dominated by the existing red cedars and will not impede the available growing space for the proposed bigleaf maple. The required sets of application materials and the addressed envelopes have also been provided as requested. Please contact me at 503-989-9345 with any questions. Sincerely 11)//fit` S e;a uh,Principal Conservation Technix, Inc. On behalf of City of Tigard Steve Martin,Parks and Facilities Manager PO Box 12736 • Portland,OR 97212 • 503.989.9345 (p) www.conservationtechnix.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 . Summary of Proposal 1-1 Section 2. Proposed Development 2-1 Section 3. Current Conditions & Impact Study 3-1 Section 4. Application Narrative 4-1 Appendix A. Pre-Application Conference Notes A-1 Appendix B. Neighborhood Meeting Notes B-1 Appendix C. Service Provider Letter C-1 Appendix D. Arborist Report & Tree Canopy Study D-1 Appendix E. Deed & Encumbrances E-1 Appendix F. Storm Water Calculations F-1 FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Zoning Map Figure 3. Aerial Parcel Map Figure 4. Site Photos • PLANSET DRAWINGS Cover Sheet& Vicinity Map Existing Conditions Plan Tree Preservation & Removal Plan Tree Canopy & Planting Plan Site Development Plan Grading, Erosion Control & Storm Drainage Plan REC8VED SEP 252013 • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING • Section 1 . Summary Proposal Pro osal Applicant: Steve Martin, Parks& Facilities Manager City of Tigard Parks Division 8777 SW Burnham Street Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 718-2583 Fax: (503) 684-8840 Email: steve(uAigard-or.gov Applicant's Representative: Steve Duh Conservation Technix PO Box 12736 Portland, OR 97212 Phone: (503) 989-9345 Email: steve(q conservationtechnix.com Project Request: Type III-Hearing Officer(1-10) Conditional Use Permit to approve development of a new pocket park on City owned land. The review will also demonstrate • compliance with provisions of Chapter 18.360 (Site Development Review). A copy of the May 9, 2013 Pre- Application Conference notes is included in Appendix A. The required neighborhood meeting was held on August 1, 2013 and documentation to which is provided in Appendix B. Location: 9868 SW 74th Avenue Site Size: 0.25 acres Tax Lot Description: 1 S 125DC, Lots 09500 & 09600 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Current Zoning: R-4.5 Applications Submitted For: Type-III Conditional Use Neighborhood: North Tigard Summary: The City adopted its Park System Master Plan in 2009. The plan outlines the need to acquire park property and • construct park improvements to preserve open spaces, Section 1 1-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • enhance water quality and provide recreational • opportunities. On November 2, 2010, Tigard voters passed a $17 million general obligation bond to fund the purchase of real property for parks and to fund a limited amount of park development. The City of Tigard Parks Division intends to develop Senn Park as a pocket park. This park project was identified as a priority project in the Park System Master Plan,the adopted City of Tigard CIP and the Notice of City Measure Election provided to voters regarding the 2010 parks bond. The City purchased Senn Park in July 2007. The presently undeveloped property contains a small open area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk and street trees. This site will be designated as a pocket park and trailhead. The City desires to proceed with a first phase of site development to enhance the usability of the site. Anticipated improvements include the installation of a small playground and wood chip trail to an adjacent 4.5-acre City-owned greenspace along Ash Creek. • • Section 1 1-2 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • Design Team for City of Tigard Senn Park Land Use Planner: Conservation Technix PO Box 12736 Portland, OR 97212 Phone: (503) 989-9345 Landscape Architect: MIG, Inc. 815 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Phone: (503) 297-1005 Arborist: Morgan Nolen & Associates, Inc. 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P 220 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Phone: (971) 409-9354 • Survey & Civil Engineer: CES 1 NW 13190 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 150 Tigard, Oregon, 97223 Phone: (503) 968-6655 • Section 1 1-3 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • Section 2. Proposed Development Summary of Proposed Project: Senn Park is comprised of two lots consisting of 0.25 acres located along the 9868 SW 74th Avenue (see Vicinity Map—Figure 1). The City purchased Senn Park in July 2007. The presently undeveloped property contains a small open area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk and street trees. The intent of the proposed project is to develop Senn Park as a small pocket park for the use and benefit of residents in the immediate neighborhood. To facilitate park development for the proposed project,the Applicant is requesting an initial Conditional Use Permit to allow "Community Recreation" as an allowed use for the property. The application also includes responses to Site Development Review and Sensitive Lands Review requirements. The site is zoned R-4.5, and "Community Recreation" is permitted as a conditional use according to Table 18.510.1 of the Tigard Development Code. All of the adjacent parcels have R-4.5 zoning. Ash Creek flows through the adjacent open space to the north, but the Senn Park property does not include any mapped CWS vegetative corridors. The City adopted its Park System Master Plan in 2009. The plan outlines the need to acquire park property and construct park improvements to preserve open spaces, enhance water quality and provide recreational opportunities. On November 2, 2010, Tigard voters passed a$17 million general obligation bond to fund the purchase of real property for parks and to fund a • limited amount of park development. The passage of the 2010 Parks Bond provides funding to enable the planning, design and development of Senn Park. This park project was identified as a priority project in the Park System Master Plan, the adopted City of Tigard CIP and the Notice of City Measure Election provided to voters regarding the parks bond. The Senn Park is designated as a linear park in the City of Tigard's 2009 Park System Master Plan. The Park System Master Plan is the guiding document of the overall parks bond program, and it describes, by example, the characteristics of different city park classifications. Linear parks are primarily corridors for natural features or trails, but providing basic park amenities, such as play areas and picnic facilities, in a linear park is an opportunity to meet local park needs throughout Tigard. In the attached project narrative, the term pocket park is used because it more aptly describes the site's size and function within the context of a typical amenity within the classification of linear park. In either case, this application requests a use change to allow "Community Recreation" on site, to which either park term is related. Proposed Site Plan & Improvements: As noted above and as illustrated on the Site Development Plan, the planned future development of the site includes a trailhead for pedestrians and a playground. • Section 2 2-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • • • • n cn T C. n Q655 7105 G4 0 0 7083, Senn Park-Vicinity D i 9(0 l'- N +»oo - "---IfD 9640071 7190 716: Map 4651 La„ �. W 9720 967Q3 7130 7108 7090 7.. > 1663 or Q 7 761 1 I SHADY PL TS '� �j 3 t- `7 /183 7169 7157 A wr_ 728472 723D - J X1 3 77105 7069 70411 ASH CREEK r; r 9 .. 72 1191 71727158 7144 __.1 _j----7136 7120709417070 1 —3 -- « _. 1i0S6 r�®� •.,-.1 v R E d1i .N.114 - CEDAR WAY - fir4r,�s 911611 •1 71981 7466 7438 7 ,/ —. —} 7205 g895/ I 7185 3 j 1 j `-I 7165] 71451 7125 71051 7085J 7065 7045 702`, 9903 VE ; kA ;R 7491 7469 7433991i' 7345' _I __I _..-1 ."- - ._. 71601 _j __3 _ 71 111 7100 —7.08) 7050 ,AN: /48S 7453 111005 10008 10006 } Mepxmseaat+usoFnno, PAug1a 74 31 u` 7120 7180 10055 NO xu P•NILL 5 (n Q 10031 .. �L EKE a36PC CJFi I*5 SA",!' ro ! ' l OD 3 i 7025 10060 _B. 0. ��r -...,. Z N 10061 cMd aro Cr 100E6 p 13'21aAtta e1, *eet 10095 /II 17 T16ARMgPS r ,ra. ,?i+' NJ C L.C 1 U 0130 10097 vw.w teirao•ca 7i1ARD N O n.r N W NJ ll T rte^. 9655 7105di 0 0 7083 Senn Park -Zoning ri -I 1.,..) 9700 9645 Ma o v 9640 7190 7162 P N N R-4.5 9651NJ r0 7108 S. 9720 9663 9670 7130 7090 7072 ao w 13 Q 7261 3 77 SHADY PL -Ca 't 718 3 7169 7157 7284 7272 7258 7230 7143 7131 7105 7069 7041 9777 7206 ASH CREEK CT II 1194 71727158 7144 R-4.5 (PD) 7136 7120 7094 7070 7056 RED CEDAR WAY 9868 7498 7466 7438 9887 7205 9895 7185 7225 7165 7145 7125 7105 7085 7065 7045 9903 7025 VENTURA DR 7491 7469 743399u 7345 7160 7130 7100 7080 7050 LANDAU ST 10005 10008 Map anntea at 10 78 ARA co,J-Aug 1 s 7485 7453 7431 W10006 "-' _. -r..1 - . 7320 j 7280 10055 I Q 1°631 -J 10031 7025 crl 10060 d g . 7.1" N 10061 I- Cmeot'satl NJ a Feet 2S0 • 1006ti 7041 tICAR�Maps �a tl oR9 2.J . 00 10095 10088 ^ "'' A 197 wnw trartl-oco, trAatl N O N 1--, i W W 1110 III • . . • Figure 3 -Aerial Parcel Map 1 " g (71j me - O qp : O Y QA. ' " $yam sr CU _- E c n 0 1 ;' _ ♦ ..,. • • ogit r f • (s. III , _. .... r 3. , 1 .---4r7 NWaii. is• +a mi — _ ,t 1.. ..irk, . -V* • NO *. I I 4 • aIt .e 1111 Section 2 2-4 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 w • Section 3 . Current Conditions Et Impact Study Vicinity: Senn Park is comprised of 2 parcels (Tax Map: 2S125DC, Lots 09500 and 09600) consisting of 0.25 acres located at 9868 SW 74th Avenue, immediately south of an adjacent 4.5 acre green space along Ash Creek. The project site is located in the North Tigard neighborhood. Zoning: The site is zoned R-4.5, and "Community Recreation" is permitted as a conditional use according to Table 18.510.1 of the Tigard Development Code. Nearby parcels on the north side of SW 74th Avenue have R-4.5 zoning. Site History: The City purchased Senn Park in July 2007. The presently undeveloped property contains a small open area and a mix of trees. The street frontage has been improved to include curb, sidewalk and street trees. Senn Park is designated as a linear park in the City of Tigard's 2009 Park System Master Plan. Linear parks are primarily corridors for natural features or trails, but providing basic park amenities, such as play areas and picnic facilities, in a linear park is an opportunity to meet local park needs throughout Tigard. Site Characteristics: Senn Park is located near Ash Creek within the Fanno Creek watershed • sub basin. The park has fencing along its northern perimeter to define the property edge and provide protection of the vegetated corridor of Ash Creek within the adjacent parcel to the north. The site topography is sloped toward the creek and contains a small upper shelf near SW 74th Avenue. Existing vegetation includes trees, grasses and ground covers. The property does not include sensitive lands, and the project will not intrude into a floodplain, wetland, drainageway or vegetated corridor. Figure 4: Site Photos 1.1_10 4," 1 it IF, . ,, 'i. *v 1 r . , ..,, .•, sr... ii,f-, '1' 't '. 4, ..... 051 ., ;c a -,..,•-m, %`fir '44=,'' „ow,. ,ai "„` 4 ` _iR�i d ...• " 6,7%, � - , - .•r Figure 4A—Upper shelf along SW 74th Ave Figure 4B—Fenced boundary at adjacent open space III Section 3 3-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Impact Study 111 Parks System: The 2009 Tigard Park System Master Plan identifies acquisition, expansion, and/or development of neighborhood parks, community parks and open space adequate to serve the current and projected population of Tigard at the service standards established in the plan. The proposed improvements to Senn Park will enhance and create additional recreational opportunities for residents of the North Tigard neighborhood. The proposed pocket park will provide public recreation facilities in the form of a playground and wood chip pathway that will help meet the community's need for recreation and social interaction. Transportation System: Half-street improvements for SW 74th Avenue had been completed previously, and no additional street frontage improvements are proposed. The proposed pocket park is not adjacent to or within 500 feet of an existing or proposed transit route. The nearest transit routes are over 1,800 feet from the park entrance.The nearest bus stop is located at Landau Street and SW 80th Avenue.No impacts affecting transit ridership are anticipated from the proposed project. Bikeways: At the present, no bike lanes exist along SW 74th Avenue, which is classified as a Neighborhood Street.No bike lanes are identified along this roadway in the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan. The proposed improvements to Senn Park will not attract additional cyclists to the pocket park and will have no impact on the broader demand for bikeways in this area of the city. Drainage System: Surface water runoff from the proposed park will be detained on site. A • significant majority (92%)of the park will remain as pervious landscaping and open space. Half street improvements to SW 74th Avenue are completed and include storm water inlets that connect to an existing 12" main line within the right-of-way. The amount of storm water runoff generated by new imperious areas within the park interior is minimal and is limited to the concrete edging to the playground and a small segment of concrete pathway. Water quality treatment of runoff generated by the concrete pathway will be provided by sheet flow across vegetation within the vegetated corridor, similar to a filter strip. The required CWS service letter is contained in Appendix C. Water System: Water service to the site is provided by the City of Tigard Water Division. Two water lines exist within SW 74th Avenue. The proposed project will not require water service at this time, although sufficient flow and capacity exists within the existing water mains to support the potential need for future, limited landscape irrigation. Sewer System: An 8" sewer mains exist within the SW 74th right-of-way. The proposed project does not include the installation of any structures or facilities that will require a connection to the sewer system.No impact to the capacity of the sanitary sewer is anticipated. Fire Suppression: Fire protection is provided by the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Department(TVF&R),and the project site is approximately 2 miles from Station 53.Two fire hydrants exist near the project site and are located in the following areas: the north side of Shady Place at SW 74th Avenue and along the frontage of 7466 SW Red Cedar Way.No structures are • Section 3 3-2 City of Tigard Semi Park September 24,2013 • proposed with the project. All proposed amenities for the park will fall within State Fire Prevention Codes and Guidelines. Noise Impacts: Minimal temporary noise would be created at the time of park construction, during normal working hours. Low-level construction noise would be generated from vehicles and equipment used in park construction. Once the park is built and open to the public, low- level,pedestrian type noise is anticipated from the use of the walking paths and playground. The type of noise would be in the same category found in any area frequented by walkers, hikers and bicycle riders. Any anticipated level of noise associated with the park use will be within acceptable limits. During the period of park construction, work hours will be restricted per City standards, and the use of muffled equipment will be enforced by an on-site construction manager. In the event that unforeseen noise impacts become known during the construction and future use of the park, the applicant will coordinate directly with affected neighbors for enhanced site management and other improvements as appropriate. • • Section 3 3-3 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Section 4. Application Narrative lication , The purpose of this section is to demonstrate that the proposed park project meets all the applicable standards and requirements of the Tigard Development Code, Title 18. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS As a result of the Pre-Application Conference, City staff directed the applicant to the following applicable Development Code chapters. 18.330—Conditional Use 18.360—Site Development Review 18.390—Decision Making Procedures 18.510—Residential Zones 18.705 —Access, Egress and Circulation 18.725—Environmental Performance Standards 18.745—Landscaping and Screening 18.755 —Recycling 18.765 —Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.775 —Sensitive Lands 18.780—Signs 18.790— Urban Forestry Plan • 18.795 —Visual Clearance 18.810—Street and Utility Improvement Standards Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) Section 18.330.020 Approval Process A. Initial applications.A request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030.A and subject to other requirements in this chapter. Finding: This is a new conditional use;therefore, it will be processed as a Type III-HO application. Section 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. Approval standards. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use. Finding: The 0.25-acre site is adequately sized to accommodate the proposed park development. While the City of Tigard does not maintain minimum park size criteria, pocket parks similar to the one proposed are typically sited on properties ranging from 0.25 - 1 acres in size. This approval provision is met. i Section 4 4-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. Finding: The site contains a flat, upper shelf along the south side of the property near SW 74th Avenue. This flat area will provide sufficient space for the proposed small playground. A proposed wood chip pathway will lead down the slope to the city-owned open space at the adjacent parcel to the north. The property's size and shape are suitable for a pocket park. All proposed improvements are intended to be designed, constructed, and maintained in a low impact/sustainable manner. This approval provision is met. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. Finding: As described in the Impact Study in Section 3, there are adequate public facilities and services to serve the site subject. This approval provision is met. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. Finding: In this chapter, the applicant is demonstrating compliance with applicable design, development and performance standards. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050. Finding: The provisions of Section 18.330.050(B) related to community recreation and parks apply in this case. As demonstrated below, the additional standards pertaining to the proposed use are met. • 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable/are met. Finding: This chapter includes all of the applicable regulations that apply to this site as detailed in the Pre-Application Conference notes (Appendix A). Section 18.330.050(B) Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types 5.) Community Recreation and Parks a. All building setbacks shall be a minimum of 30 feet from any property line Finding: No new structures are proposed on site. This approval provision does not apply. b. There are no off-street parking requirements, except ...for a dog park or off-leash area Finding: The proposed park will not be a designated dog park, and there will not be any sort of fenced enclosure where dogs are allowed off-leash. This approval provision does not apply to the project. Site Development Review (Chapter 33.360) Section 18.360.030 Approval Process A. New developments and major modifications. Site development review for a new development or major modification of an approved plan or existing development, as defined in Section • Section 4 4-2 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 18.360.020.A1 shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section • 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.090. Finding: The SDR for this project is being reviewed in conjunction with the Type-III Conditional Use application. Section 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Finding: Documentation of compliance with all applicable provisions of Chapter 18,as identified in the Pre-Application Conference notes, is provided in the remainder of this section. This provision will be met. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: a. Buildings shall be... (1)Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2)Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3)Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Finding: The proposed project is a public park; a strong relationship between the built and natural environment is a guiding principle to park planning and design.No buildings are • proposed with this application, only the installation of a small playground and pathway. This provision does not apply. b. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3. and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map. "Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); (2)Pervious pavement; (3)Soil amendment; (4) Roof runoff controls; (5)Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; (6)Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; (7)Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. Finding: The proposed project is a public park, and approximately 92%of the total site consists of pervious or landscaped area. A significant majority of existing trees and other vegetation will remain intact upon project completion, and new landscape plantings will be added. This provision will be met. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following... • Section 4 4-3 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 IIIFinding: The proposed project is a public park; no residential structures are proposed. This provision does not apply. 4. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses,for example, between single-family and multiple family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer... Finding: As a public park,the proposed design takes full advantage of the existing trees and smaller vegetation on site, and approximately 92%of the total site will remain as pervious, natural open space.New landscape plantings are proposed in the park to add native vegetation and to enhance screening and buffering from the surrounding residential lots. This provision will be met. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas,parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3)How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. ID Finding: New landscape plantings are proposed throughout the park to add native vegetation and to enhance screening and buffering from the surrounding residential lots. In addition to the existing vegetation and trees that will remain be preserved on site,the new landscaping will enhance screening from adjoining properties.No storage areas, parking lots or mechanical devices atop structures will be provided. This provision will be met. 5. Privacy and noise—Multifamily or group living uses: Finding: The proposed project is a public park. This provision does not apply. 6. Private outdoor area—Multifamily use: Finding: The proposed project is a public park. This provision does not apply. 7. Shared outdoor recreation areas—Multifamily use: Finding: The proposed project is a public park. This provision does not apply. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100 year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Finding: The proposed project is a public park, and none of the proposed recreational amenities are within or and adjacent to a 100-year floodplain. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-4 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 9. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: • a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and Finding: The proposed project is a public park. This provision does not apply. 10. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; Finding: The proposed project is a public park. This provision does not apply. b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; Finding: The proposed project is a public park. This provision does not apply. c. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; Finding: The proposed project is a public park.No mailboxes are proposed. This provision does not apply. d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and Finding: The proposed project is a public park, and as per City code the park will close • at dusk.No exterior lighting is proposed with this application. This provision does not apply. e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Finding: The proposed project is a public park, and the City of Tigard regulates park hours by ordinance with park closure at dusk.No exterior lighting is proposed with this application. This provision does not apply. 11. Public transit: a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; Finding: The proposed public park is not adjacent to or within 500 feet of an existing or proposed transit route. The nearest transit routes are over 1,800 feet from the proposed park entrance. This project is not anticipated to add demand for transit ridership. This provision does not apply. S Section 4 4-5 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • 12. Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 and 18.790; Finding: As described in detail below,the proposed project meets the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 and 18.790. This provision is met. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of Subsections A.5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20%of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and Finding: The proposed project is the development of a public pocket park. Loading, service areas and parking lots will not be provided. Approximately 92%of the site will remain as pervious surface with landscaping and native tree vegetation. This provision is met. c. A minimum of 15%of the gross site area shall be landscaped Finding: The proposed project is the development of a public pocket park. Excluding the impervious walkway and playground border(approximately 956 square feet),the landscaped area will exceed 92%of the gross site area, with the effective tree canopy exceeding 200%. This provision is met. 13. Drainage:All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Finding: Surface water runoff from the proposed park will be detained on site. A significant 411 majority (92%) of the park will remain as pervious landscaping and open space. Half street improvements to SW 74th Avenue are completed and include storm water inlets that connect to an existing 12" main line within the right-of-way. The amount of storm water runoff generated by new imperious areas within the park interior is minimal and is limited to the concrete edging to the playground and a small segment of concrete pathway. Water quality treatment of runoff generated by the concrete pathway will be provided by sheet flow across vegetation within the vegetated corridor, similar to a filter strip. The required CWS service letter is contained in Appendix C. 14. Provision for the disabled:All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Finding: All new construction is required to meet applicable standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act as integrated into the Uniform Building Code. The new 2010 Accessibility Standards will be met. Playground surfaces will conform to ASTM F 1951-99. ADA routes, including hard-surfaced walking paths,will not exceed the 5% longitudinal slope standards. This provision will be met. 15. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Finding: As noted in this narrative,the Applicant has shown compliance with the applicable provisions of the underlying zone, and no variances or adjustments are requested. This provision is met. Section 4 4-6 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Decision-Making Procedures (Chapter 18.390) • Section 18.390.050 Type III Procedures A. Pre-application conference. A pre-application conference is required for all Type III actions. Finding: The PAC notes for this application are contained in Appendix A. B. Application requirements 1. Application forms. Type III applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080.E.1. Finding: The appropriate application materials have been submitted. 2. Content. Type III applications shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form. Finding: Compliance has been achieved as demonstrated by the completeness letter. b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action. Finding: All of the relevant approval criteria are addressed. Documentation of compliance has been achieved as demonstrated by the completeness letter. c. Be accompanied by the required fee. Finding: The required fee has been submitted. d. Include two sets of pre-stamped,pre-addressed envelopes for all persons who are property III owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.050.C. Finding: The two sets of envelopes will be submitted. e. Include an impact study. Finding: The impact study is provided in Section 3. The study addresses the transportation, drainage, parks, water, sewer systems, as well as bikeway and noise impacts of the proposed park development. This provision is met. Residential Zoning Districts(Chapter 18.510) Section 18.510.050 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370. 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. Finding: As demonstrated in the remainder of this narrative and impact study, all applicable standards and requirements are shown to be met. B. Development standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. • Section 4 4-7 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • Criteria from Table 18.510.2 Standard(R-4.5) Subject Property Minimum Lot Size 7,500 s,f: 10,890 s.f. Average Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 160 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage — — Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft. NA-no structures Side facing street on corner& through lots 15 ft. NA Side yard 5 ft. NA-no structures Rear yard 15 ft. NA-no structures Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning — — district Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. NA—no garage Maximum Height 30 ft. NA-no structures Minimum Landscape Requirement — — Finding: As shown in the applicant's narrative,planset and in the comparative table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying R-4.5 zoning district. This approval provision is met. Access, Egress And Circulation (Chapter 18.705) • 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Finding: As illustrated on the proposed Site Development Plan, no vehicular access is planned in the future development of the pocket park,which will serve the residents of the immediate neighborhood vicinity. This requirement does not apply. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Finding: No vehicular access or egress is planned, and no structures are proposed. This requirement does not apply. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title... Finding: This proposal pertains to a single parcel and single owner. Joint access provisions do not apply. • Section 4 4-8 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030.H 11111 and 18.705.030.1 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Finding: As illustrated on the proposed Site Development Plan, no vehicular access and egress to a public or private street approved by the City for public use is planned in the future development of the park. This requirement does not apply. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N Finding: As illustrated on the proposed Site Development Plan,no vehicular access and egress is planned for the park, and no curb cuts are proposed. This requirement does not apply. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Finding: This application is not regarding a commercial, institutional,or industrial use;the proposed pocket park development is a civic use. The proposed design includes a pathway and a small playground. Pathways are designed to provide access to and between this public amenity. This requirement does not apply. 2. Within all attached housing(except two-family dwellings)and multi family developments, • each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Finding: The proposed park development is a civic use. This requirement does not apply. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping,pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; Finding: No vehicular access,egress or parking lots are planned for the park. This requirement does not apply. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. III Section 4 4-9 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • Finding: Although no new walkways as described in 18.705.030.F(1)& F(2) above are required for this project, the proposed design includes a hard-surfaced walkway at the playground and a wood chip pathway. These pathways are designed to drain to adjacent park land and surrounding landscape. Per the City municipal code, Senn Park will close at dusk; therefore, additional safety lighting is not required. However, low-level, solar powered lighting may be installed for added safety and surveillance if the future operation of the park warrants it. This requirement will be met. G. Inadequate or hazardous access. 1. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, the access proposed: a. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or b. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or c. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Finding: Advisory.No vehicular access and egress to a public or private street approved by the City for public use is planned in the future development of the park. This requirement does not apply. 2. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. If direct access is permitted by the City, the applicant will be required to mitigate for any safety or neighborhood traffic management(NTM) impacts deemed applicable by the City Engineer. This may include, but will not be limited to, the construction of a vehicle turnaround on the site to eliminate the need for a vehicle to back out onto the roadway. Finding: No direct access to an arterial or collector street is proposed. SW 74th Avenue is classified as a neighborhood street. This provision does not apply. 3. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single- family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. Finding: No vehicular access and egress to a public or private street approved by the City for public use is planned in the future development of the park. This provision does not apply. H. Access management. 1.An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility.) 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic • Section 4 4-10 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less Ill than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Finding: This project does not propose the construction of any new local streets, driveway, curb cuts or accessways. These provision do not apply. I Minimum access requirements for residential use. (1 -6) Finding: The proposed project is for a small pocket park; it is not a residential use. These provisions do not apply. I Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. (1 -3) Finding: The proposed project is for a small pocket park; it is not a residential use. These provisions do not apply. K. One-way vehicular access points. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. Finding: No vehicular access points are planned in the future development of the park. This requirement does not apply. III L. Director's authority to restrict access. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions... Finding: Advisory. Environmental Performance Standards (Chapter 18.725) Section 18.725.020 General Provisions A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the regulations adopted in this chapter, each use, activity or operation within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission pertaining to non point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a part of this chapter. Finding: The only additional regulations that apply to the proposed project are related to stormwater management that is the province of Clean Water Services (CWS), which enforces its storm water manual across much of the county. Compliance with CWS regulations is demonstrated via receipt of the Service Provider Letter(Appendix A). Generally,this provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-11 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • B. Evidence of compliance. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Director may require submission of evidence demonstrating compliance with state,federal and local environmental regulations and receipt of necessary permits; these include Air Contaminant Discharge Permits (ACDP) or Indirect Source Construction Permits (ISCP). Finding: Except for on-site stormwater,this provision does not apply. C. Continuing obligation. Compliance with state,federal and local environmental regulations is the continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. Finding: Advisory. This provision generally does not apply. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Finding: As a public park, low-level,pedestrian type noise is anticipated from the use of the site as a dog park. Any anticipated level of noise associated with the park use will be within acceptable limits. In the event that unforeseen noise impacts become known during the construction and future use of the park, the applicant will coordinate directly with affected neighbors for enhanced site management and other improvements as appropriate. B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park(IP)zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules IIII for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Finding: The proposed project is a public park, which will have no activities that would result in visible emissions. This provision does not apply. C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in vibration. This provision does not apply. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Finding: The proposed project is a public park, which will have no activities that would result in odors. This provision does not apply. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. • Section 4 4-12 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in • undue glare and heat. This provision does not apply. F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Finding: As per standard city park maintenance practices,the waste containers will be accessible for collection by maintenance staff daily. Park maintenance staff will manage the disposal of refuse and other"wet" garbage in the industrially-acceptable manner that prevents any potential vector infestation. This provision will be met. Landscaping and Screening(Chapter 18.745) Section 18.745.030 General Provisions Maintenance Responsibility. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the ongoing maintenance of all landscaping and screening used to meet the requirements of this chapter according to applicable industry standards. Finding: As a City facility,the City of Tigard parks maintenance staff will maintain the subject site as required by this regulation. This provision is met. B. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping and screening required by this chapter shall be as follows: • 1. All landscaping and screening shall be installed according to applicable industry standards. Finding: The Tree Canopy&Planting Plan for the proposed park includes standard installation guidelines used by the industry to which the applicant will adhere during installation. 2. All plants shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nursery Stock(ANSI Z60, 1-2004, and any future revisions); and Finding: Plant materials will be obtained from a certified landscaping purveyor to meet the size and grade standards for each specimen, in compliance with these requirements. 3. All landscaping and screening shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Finding: See below for further information. C. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the requirements of this chapter have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Finding: The applicant understands that the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be granted until the required landscaping is installed, inspected and approved by the City. D. Protection of existing plants. Existing plants on a site shall be protected as follows: II/ Section 4 4-13 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing plants to remain during the construction process; 2. The plants to remain shall be noted on the landscape plans (i.e.,plants to remain can be shown as protected with fencing); 3. The tree protection provisions outlined in Chapter 18.790 and the Urban Forestry Manual shall apply to the land use review types identified in Section 18.790.020.A. Finding: The Tree Preservation and Removal Plan includes information that illustrates the measures taken to protect existing plants, in compliance with this requirement. The Tree Preservation and Removal Plan notes the existing plants to be preserved,except for 5 trees identified for removal due to poor tree health or nuisance species. Tree protection provisions are addressed below in findings pertaining to Chapter 18.790. This requirement is met. E. Ongoing tree related rules and regulations. Any trees used to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be subject to all applicable tree related rules and regulations in other chapters and titles of the Tigard Municipal Code and Tigard Development Code. Finding: Advisory. This provision will be met. Section 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Street Tree Standards. 1. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for Conditional Use (Type III), Downtown Design Review (Type II and III), Minor Land Partition (Type II), Planned Development(Type III), Site Development Review (Type II) and Subdivision (Type II and III) permits. 111 Finding: This application is for a Type-III Conditional Use to establish the land use of this site as Community Recreation; therefore,the provisions related to street trees apply to this project. This requirement is met. 2. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by rounding to the nearest whole number. Finding: As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan,the linear footage of the frontage along SW 74th Avenue is 160 feet,which requires 4 street trees as defined by the calculation within this provision. As illustrated on the Tree Canopy& Planting Plan, a total of 4 street trees will be provided with this project. This requirement is met. 3. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Finding: As illustrated in the Tree Canopy& Planting Plan, the street trees will be planted according to the standards defined in the Urban Forestry Manual. The plans and supplemental Arborist Report outline the planting standards and requirements for the project. This requirement is met. 4. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to the Street Tree Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Section 4 4-14 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Finding: As illustrated in Tree Canopy& Planting Plan, sufficient soil volumes will be • available for new street trees planted as part of this project. This requirement is met. 5. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the right of way whenever practicable according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Street trees may be planted no more than 6 feet from the right of way according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the right of way is not practicable. Finding: As illustrated in the Tree Canopy& Planting Plan,the proposed street trees will be planted within the existing right of way for 74th Avenue. This requirement is met. 6. An existing tree may be used to meet the street tree standards provided that: a. The largest percentage of the tree trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses is either within the subject site or within the right of way immediately adjacent to the subject site; b. The tree would be permitted as a street tree according to the Street Tree Planting and Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual if it were newly planted; and c. The tree is shown as preserved in the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan (per 18.790.030.A.2), Tree Canopy Cover Site Plan (per 18.790.030.A.3)and Supplemental Report(per 18.790.030.A.4) of a concurrent urban forestry plan and is eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Finding: As illustrated in the Tree Canopy& Planting Plan, no existing tree is proposed for use as a street tree. All new trees will be planted to satisfy the requirements of this section. This requirement does not apply. • 7. In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees, the Director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the Urban Forestry Fund for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the City's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three (3)years(per the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual)for each tree below the minimum required. Finding: As noted in the response to section 18.745.040.A.(2),the minimum number of required street trees is provided with this application. This provision does not apply. Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. Finding: The proposed park improvements would enhance the pedestrian experience with improved trail access through the park and perimeter landscaping to provide enhanced separation from surrounding uses.No solid fences or hedges are proposed that would interfere with views from neighboring properties. This provision is met. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). • Section 4 4-15 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix. Finding: The proposed use is Community Recreation, which is not a listed use in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2. This provision does not apply. 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards,provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. Finding: The proposed use is Community Recreation, which is not a listed use in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2. This provision does not apply. B. Buffering and screening requirements (1-9) Finding: The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1 or 18.745.2. The underlying residential zoning classification is the same on the subject parcel as it is on the adjacent parcels to the north and south. Therefore,the buffering and screening requirements do not apply. C. Setbacks for fences or walls (1-4) Finding: The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1 or 18.745.2. No fences or walls used for buffering or screening are proposed for this park project. Therefore,these requirements do not apply. • D. Height restrictions (1-2) Finding: The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1 or 18.745.2.No fences, walls or landscaping are required for buffering and screening for the proposed park project. Therefore, these requirements do not apply. E. Screening:special provisions 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas (i.e. nonconforming situation) be permitted to become any less conforming. Nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas shall be brought into conformance with the provisions of this chapter as part of the approval process for Condition Use (Type III), Downtown Design Review (Type II and III), Planned Development(Type III), and Site Development Review (Type II)permits only. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1)Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; (2)Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3)Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; • Section 4 4-16 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 (4)All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30%tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with the Parking Lot Tree Canopy Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Finding: This application does not include parking and loading areas. This provision does not apply. 2. Screening of service facilities. Except for one family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. Finding: This application does not include refuse disposal areas or service facilities. This provision does not apply. 3. Screening of swimming pools. All swimming pools shall be enclosed as required by the State Building Code. Finding: This application does not include a swimming pool. This provision does not apply. 4. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one-and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street,parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. • Finding: This application does not include commercial refuse containers or refuse collection areas. This provision does not apply. F. Buffer matrix (1-2) Finding: The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1 or 18.745.2. Therefore, the buffering and screening requirements do not apply. Screening for the proposed parking lot is addressed above in response to section 18.745.050.E. Section 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping and screening requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Finding: The proposed Tree Canopy& Planting Plan illustrates all proposed landscaped areas, including those re-planted following construction, in compliance with this requirement. This provision is met. B. Preparation for re-vegetation. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway, and • Section 4 4-17 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • 1. Such storage shall be located consistent with an approved urban forestry plan per Chapter 18.790 or outside the tree canopy driplines of trees intended to be preserved in cases when there this is no approved urban forestry plan; and 2. After completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. Finding: As part of the instructions by the applicant's consulting landscape architect,the measures governing re-vegetation will be undertaken in compliance with these requirements. C. Methods of re-vegetation 1. Acceptable methods of re-vegetation include hydro-mulching or the planting of rye grass, barley, or other seed with equivalent germination rates, and: a. Where lawn or turf grass is to be established, lawn grass seed or other appropriate landscape cover is to be sown at not less than four pounds to each 1,000 square feet of land area; b. Other re-vegetation methods offering equivalent protection may be approved by the approval authority; c. Plant materials are to be watered at intervals sufficient to ensure survival and growth; and d. The use of native plant materials is encouraged to reduce irrigation and maintenance demands. Finding: As part of the instructions by the applicant's consulting landscape architect,these measures governing re-vegetation will be undertaken in compliance with these requirements. • Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage(Chapter 18.755) Section 18.755.010 Purpose and Applicability A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that certain new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source-separated recyclable materials prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. B. Applicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full Site Plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition,for such uses. Finding: The mixed solid waste and recyclables storage standards apply to facilities subject to pick up by commercial haulers. Therefore,these standards do not apply to the proposed park use where City of Tigard Public Works provides the service. The remaining provisions of this Section do not apply, although responses to the various requirements are provided to demonstrate compliance in general. Section 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance A Alternative methods of compliance.An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards. Finding: The applicant is selecting this option. • Section 4 4-18 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 B. Provisions. The following provisions apply to all four methods of demonstrating compliance: 1. Section 18.755.050, Location, Design and Access Standards, except as provided in 18.755.040 G. Finding: These requirements will be met; see below. 2. The floor area of an interior or exterior storage area required by this chapter shall be excluded from the calculation of lot coverage and from the calculation of building floor area for purposes of determining minimum storage requirements. Finding: This provision is advisory. C. Minimum standards method 4. General requirements: a. The storage area requirement is based on the predominant use(s) of the building(i.e. residential, office, retail wholesale/warehouse/manufacturing, educational/institutional, or other). If a building has more than one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies 20 percent or less of the floor area of the building, the floor area occupied by that use shall be counted toward the floor area of the predominant use(s). If a building has more than one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies more than 20%of the floor area of the building, then the storage area requirement for the whole building shall be the sum of the requirement for the area of each use. Finding: In the proposed park development,the predominant use is civic in nature, and no buildings are proposed with the application. This provision does not apply. h. Storage areas for multiple uses on a single site may be combined and shared. • Finding: Only one use (civic)will exist on site. This provision does not apply. c. The specific requirements are based on an assumed storage height of 4 feet for solid waste/recyclable. Vertical storage higher than 4 feet but no higher than 7 feet may be used to accommodate the same volume of storage in a reduced floor space (potential reduction of 43%of specific requirements). Where vertical or stacked storage is proposed, the Site Plan shall include drawings to illustrate the layout of the storage area and dimensions of containers. Finding: The proposed pocket park will include one standard waste receptacle, which is 3 feet in height.No vertical or stacked storage containers or storage areas are proposed. 5. Specific requirements: a. Non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet,plus: (5) Other: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. Finding: No buildings are proposed with this application;therefore,the square foot calculation does not apply. This provision does not apply. Section 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas B. Location standards 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; • Section 4 4-19 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • Finding: No vertical or stacked storage containers or storage areas are proposed;therefore, no co-located recyclable waste storage is provided. This provision does not apply. As per current standard city park maintenance practices, the separation of recyclable material in city parks and open space is not provided. Refuse is collected daily. 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Finding: No interior or exterior storage areas are proposed with this application. The waste receptacle at the park entrance will be constructed of steel and will meet Uniform Fire Code standards. This requirement does not apply. 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Finding: Advisory. The applicant will provide a waste receptacle near the park entrance. This requirement will be met. 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Finding: No exterior storage areas are proposed with this application. This requirement does not apply. • 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Finding: As illustrated on the Site Development Plan, the proposed exterior waste receptacle is located at the park entrance and is in central and visible location. This requirement will be met. 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; Finding: No exterior storage areas are proposed, and no parking is included with this application. This requirement does not apply. 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Finding: The waste receptacle will be located near the main entrance and playground activity node. The location of the container will not obstruct pedestrian movement on the site or on public street adjacent to the site. The waste containers will be accessible to City maintenance staff for collection. This requirement will be met. C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; • Section 4 4-20 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Finding: The applicant proposes the placement of a waste container on site that is of • standard material,dimension and location typical to a city-owned, public park. This requirement will be met. 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Finding: The waste receptacle will be constructed of steel and will meet Uniform Fire Code standards and are made of waterproof materials. This requirement will be met. 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Finding: No exterior storage areas are included in this application. A waste receptacle will be located near the park entrance for use by park patrons. This requirement does not apply. 4. Storage area(s)and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. Finding: This is standard procedure for city parks. This requirement will be met. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; Finding: The waste container provided on site will not have limited/restricted access; it will be available to park patrons during park hours regulated by the city's municipal code and accessible by maintenance staff for daily collection. 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; Finding: Waste containers will be emptied by hand, and vehicles will not access the park interior. This provision does not apply. 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Finding: As per standard city park maintenance practices,the waste container will be accessible for collection by maintenance staff daily. Commercial hauler collection vehicles will not be utilized or allowed access to the park interior. The container will be emptied by hand by parks maintenance staff, and vehicles will not access the park interior. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-21 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • Off-Street Parking and Loading (Chapter 18.765) Section 18.765.030 General Provisions (A-H) A. Vehicle parking plan requirements B. Location of vehicle parking C. Joint parking D. Parking in mixed-use projects E. Visitor parking in multifamily residential developments F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking G. Disabled-accessible parking H. DEQ indirect source construction permit Finding: This application is to request approval of a Community Recreation use for a city- owned pocket park. Chapter 18.330.050.B(5) directs that there are no off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed project is not, and does not contain,a dog park. These provisions (A-H)regarding vehicular parking do not apply. Section 18.765.040 General Design Standards(A-N) A. Maintenance of parking areas B. Access drives C. Loading/unloading driveways D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use E. Curb cuts F. Pedestrian access • G. Parking lot landscaping H. Parking space surfacing I. Parking lot striping J. Wheel stops K Drainage L. Lighting M Signs N. Space and aisle dimensions Finding: Chapter 18.330.050.B(5)directs that there are no off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed project is not, and does not contain, a dog park. These provisions (A-N)regarding parking lot design standards do not apply. Section 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Finding: As illustrated on the Site Development Plan, bicycle parking is provided near the main entrance to the pocket park. Two bike racks are located near the entrance and playground.This provision is met. 2. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; • Section 4 4-22 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Finding: As illustrated on the Site Development Plan,the proposed bicycle parking area is • not located within a parking aisle, landscape area or pedestrian way. This provision is met. 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; Finding: The bicycle parking is located near the street frontage and playground and will be visible from 74th Avenue. This provision is met. 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Finding: No enclosed buildings are proposed in which bicycle parking could be located. This provision does not apply. B. Covered parking spaces. 1. When possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. Finding: Advisory. The proposed bicycle parking is located outdoors in the central open space of a future city park. Covered bicycle parking is not practicable for this location or use. 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the411 building entrance. Finding: No parking structure is proposed. This provision does not apply. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long- term (employee)parking is encouraged but not required; Finding: The applicant has selected a bicycle rack system that meets this requirement. 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; Finding: The proposed bike racks will be installed with concrete footings to securely anchor them to the site. This provision will be met. 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2'/_�feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area is 6 feet wide by 7 feet long. A single row of bike racks is proposed. This provision is met. 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; • Section 4 4-23 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 410 Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area has been designed to meet this requirement as illustrated on the Site Development Plan. 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; Finding: As a future city park,there are no plans to rent or lease the required bicycle racks. This requirement will be met. 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area is reserved for this parking function only, in compliance with this provision. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e.,pavers, asphalt, concrete, other pervious paving surfaces, or similar material. This surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Finding: The proposed bike racks will be installed with concrete footings and set into a concrete or asphalt pad. This provision will be met. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the • bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Finding: According to Table 18.768.2,the minimum bicycle parking for Community Recreation is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of floor area, or 2 spaces. There are no structures proposed for this site. Two racks are proposed as noted on the Site Development Plan. This standard is met. Section 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards(A-D) A. Ground floor windows/wall openings B. Exit warning bell C. Other standards D. Parking layout and internal circulation Finding: No parking structure is proposed. The provisions of 18.765.060 A-D do not apply. Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. 1. The Director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in Section 18.765.070.H, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the Director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a Director's Interpretation, as governed by Section 18.340. Finding: Minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation are identified in Table 18.765.2. However, Chapter 18.330.050.B(5) directs that there are no off- street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed • Section 4 4-24 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 project is not, and does not contain,a dog park. This provision and the remaining provisions(B- • I) of this subsection do not apply. 2. The Director shall maintain a list of approved unlisted use parking requirements which shall have the same effect as an amendment to this chapter. Finding: Advisory. This provision does not apply. Section 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements A. Off-street loading spaces. Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: B. Off-street loading dimensions. Finding: The proposed project is a civic use and does not include the construction of any commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures. This provision does not apply. Sensitive Lands (Chapter 18.775) Section 18.775.020 Applicability of Uses: Permitted, Prohibited,and Nonconforming A. CWS Stormwater Connection Permit. All proposed "development", must obtain a Stormwater Connection Permit from CWS pursuant to its "Design and Construction Standards". As used in this chapter, the meaning of the word "development"shall be as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards":All human-induced changes to improved or unimproved real property including: • 1. Construction of structures requiring a building permit, if such structures are external to existing structures; 2. Land division; 3. Drilling; 4. Site alterations resulting from surface mining or dredging; 5. Grading; 6. Construction of earthen berms; 7. Paving; 8. Excavation; or 9. Clearing when it results in the removal of trees or vegetation which would require a permit from the local jurisdiction or an Oregon Department of Forestry tree removal permit. 10. The following activities are not included in the definition of development: a. Farming activities when conducted in accordance with accepted farming practices as defined in ORS 30.930 and under a Senate Bill 1010 water quality management plan; b. Construction, reconstruction, or modification of a single-family residence on an existing lot of record within a subdivision that was approved by the City or County after September 9, 1995 (from ORS 92.040(2)); and c. Any development activity for which land use approvals have been issued pursuant to a land use application submitted to the City or County on or before February 4, 2000, and deemed complete or before March 15, 2000. Finding: Development as defined by Clean Water Services includes all human-induced changes to improved or unimproved real property. Based on this definition, the proposed project includes • Section 4 4-25 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 IIIdevelopment in the form of minor grading and the installation of a small playground at Senn Park. The proposed earthwork does not encroach into sensitive lands, vegetated corridors, floodplains or habitats. All construction, grading, excavation and paving activities will be done in conformance with City of Tigard and CWS Standards. The CWS Service Provider Letter (Appendix A)noted that no site assessment is required since the property was platted after 9/9/95. Therefore, the remaining provisions of this chapter do not apply. B. Outright permitted uses with no permit required. Except as provided below and by Sections 18.775.020.D, 18.775.020.F, and 18.775.020.G, the following uses are outright permitted uses within the 100 year floodplain, drainageways, slopes that are 25%or greater, and unstable ground when the use does not involve paving. For the purposes of this chapter, the word "structure"shall exclude: children's play equipment,picnic tables, sand boxes, grills, basketball hoops and similar recreational equipment. 1. Accessory uses such as lawns, gardens, or play areas; except in (a) a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetated Corridor, as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards", or(b) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. 2. Farm uses conducted without locating a structure within the sensitive land area; except in (a) a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetative Corridor, as defined in CWS "Design and Construction Standards", or (b) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. 3. Community recreation uses, excluding structures; except in (a) a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetated Corridor, as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards", IIIor(b) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. 4. Public and private conservation areas for water, soil, open space,forest, and wildlife resources. 5. Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, blackberry, English ivy, or other noxious vegetation. 6. Maintenance of floodway excluding re-channeling; except in (a)a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetated Corridor, as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards", or(b) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. 7. Fences; except in (a) the floodway area, (b)a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetated Corridor, as defined in the CSW "Design and Construction Standards", or(c) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. 8. Accessory structures which are less than 120 square feet in size; except in (a) the floodway area, (b)a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetative Corridor, as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards", or (c) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. 9. Land form alterations involving up to 10 cubic yards of material; except in (a) the floodway area, (b) a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetative Corridor, as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards", or (c) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. Finding: The installation of the proposed playground is an outright permitted Community • Section 4 4-26 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Recreation use.No structures are proposed, and no sensitive areas or vegetated corridors will be II impacted by the project. This project is not subject to the provisions of this chapter, and it is an outright permitted use. C. Exemptions. When performed under the direction of the City, and in compliance with the provisions of the City of Tigard Standards and Specifications for Riparian Area Management, on file in the Engineering Division, the following shall be exempt from the provisions of this section: 1. Responses to public emergencies, including emergency repairs to public facilities; 2. Stream and wetlands restoration and enhancement programs; 3. Non-native vegetation removal 4. Planting of native plant species; and 5. Routine maintenance or replacement of existing public facilities projects. Finding: No sensitive areas or vegetated corridors will be impacted by the project. This project is not subject to the provisions of this chapter. D. Jurisdictional wetlands. Landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, CWS, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies, and are not designated as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map", do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100 year floodplain, slopes of 25%or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands which are not under state or • federal jurisdiction. Finding: No wetlands exist on site. The proposed development is located outside of the areas designated as significant wetlands on the City's"Wetland and Streams Corridor" map. This provision does not apply. E. Administrative sensitive lands review. 1. Administrative sensitive lands permits in the 100 year floodplain, drainageway, slopes that are 25%or greater, and unstable ground shall be obtained from the appropriate community development division for the following: 2. The responsible community development division shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a development permit, as described above, based on the standards set forth in Sections 18.775.050, 18.775.070, and 18.775.080. Finding: : No sensitive areas or vegetated corridors meeting the criteria outlined above exist on site or will be impacted by the project. This project is not subject to the provisions of this chapter. This provision does not apply. F. Sensitive lands permits issued by the Director. 1. The Director shall have the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the following areas by means of a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070: 2. Sensitive lands permits shall be required for the areas in Section 18.775.020.F.1 above when any of the following circumstances apply: Ill Section 4 4.27 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 IIIa. Ground disturbance(s) or land form alterations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; b. Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50%of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction; c. Residential and nonresidential structures intended for human habitation; and d. Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside floodway areas. Finding: :No sensitive areas or vegetated corridors meeting the criteria outlined above exist on site or will be impacted by the project. This project is not subject to the provisions of this chapter. This provision does not apply. G. Sensitive lands permits issued by the Hearings Officer. 1. The Hearings Officer shall have the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the 100- year floodplain by means of a Type IIIA procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070. 2. Sensitive lands permits shall be required in the 100 year floodplain when any of the following circumstances apply: a. Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in all floodway areas; b. Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in floodway fringe locations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; c. Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50%of the market value of the structure prior to the • improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway; d. Structures intended for human habitation; and e.Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside of floodway areas. Finding: : No sensitive areas or vegetated corridors meeting the criteria outlined above exist on site or will be impacted by the project. This project is not subject to the provisions of this chapter. This provision does not apply. H. Other uses. Except as explicitly authorized by other provisions of this chapter, all other uses are prohibited on sensitive land areas. Finding: The applicant is not proposing any additional uses other than those previously addressed. I. Nonconforming uses. A use established prior to the adoption of this title, which would be prohibited by this Chapter or which would be subject to the limitations and controls imposed by this Chapter, shall be considered a nonconforming use. Nonconforming uses shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.760. (Ord. 09-13; Ord. 06-20) Finding: There are no known, non-conforming uses that would be prohibited from this site. • Section 4 4-28 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Signs (Chapter 18.780) • 18.780.080 Sign Illumination A. Surface brightness. The surface brightness of any sign shall not exceed that produced by the diffused output obtained from 800 milliampere fluorescent light sources spaced not closer than eight inches, center on center. Finding: The proposed park entry sign will be non-illuminated. This provision does not apply. B. No exposed incandescent lamps. Any exposed incandescent lamp which exceeds 25 watts shall not be used on the exterior surface of any sign so as to expose the face of such bulb or lamp to any public street or public right-of-way with the exception of electronic information signs. Finding: The proposed park entry sign will be non-illuminated. This provision does not apply. 18.780.085 Sign Measurement A. Projecting and freestanding signs. 1. The area of a freestanding or projecting sign shall include all sign faces counted in calculating its area. Regardless of the number of sign cabinets or sign faces, the total allowable area shall not be exceeded. Finding: As illustrated on the Sign Development Plan,the area of the proposed directional sign face is 8 square feet,which is less than the maximum allowable. This provision will be met. 2. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows if the sign is composed of one or more individual cabinets or sides: IIII a. The area around and enclosing the perimeter of each cabinet, sign face or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area. The perimeter of measurable area shall not include embellishments such as pole covers,framing and decorative roofing,provided there is no written advertising copy, symbols or logos on such embellishments; Finding: Advisory. The area of the proposed directional sign face is 8 square feet,which is less than the maximum allowable and excludes the dimensions of the framing. b. If the sign is composed of more than two sign cabinets, sign facia or modules, the area enclosing the entire perimeter of all cabinets and/or modules within a single, continuous geometric figure shall be the area of the sign. Pole covers and other embellishments shall not be included in the area of the sign measurement if they do not bear written advertising copy, symbols or logos;and Finding: Advisory. The proposed sign is a single panel, sign face. This provision does not apply. c. The overall height of a freestanding sign or sign structure is measured from the grade directly below the sign to the highest point of the sign or sign structure and shall include architectural and structural embellishments. Finding: Advisory. The proposed sign measures 3 feet from the grade directly below the sign. III Section 4 4.29 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • 18.780.130 Zoning District Regulations A. In the R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 and R-1 zones. No sign of any character shall be permitted in an R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 or R-1 zone except the following: 4. For nonresidential uses, one illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding six feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved under the site development review or conditional use process will be permitted. Wall signs may not exceed five percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted; Finding: One non-illuminated freestanding, directional sign is proposed as a park entry sign. As illustrated on the Sign Development Plan,the proposed sign will be 3 feet in height with an area of 8 square feet for the sign face. This provision will be met. 18.780.140 Sign Code Adjustments A. Adjustments. The Director may grant an adjustment to the requirements of this chapter by means of a Type I or Type II procedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.8. Finding: No adjustments to the provisions of the Sign Development Code are requested. This provision does not apply. B. If an adjustment is granted, the rights thereby given to the applicant shall continue to exist and to belong to the applicant or any other owner of the land for a period of 1-1/2 years from the date of final approval: Finding: Advisory. • Urban Forestry Plan (Chapter 18.790) 18.790.020 Applicability The requirements of this chapter apply to the following situations: A. The following land use reviews: 1. Conditional Use (Type III); 2. Downtown Design Review (Type II and III); 3. Minor Land Partition (Type II); 4. Planned Development(Type III); 5. Sensitive Lands Review (Type II and III); 6. Site Development Review (Type II); and 7. Subdivision (Type II and III). B.All Type I modifications to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use permit as required by Section 18.790.070. C. For land use projects limited to an existing right of way or easement, the development site shall be considered the existing right of way or easement and the urban forestry plan requirements shall be limited to the existing right of way or easement. Finding: This application is for the development of a community park that requires a Type-III Conditional Use Permit review. The provisions of this section will apply to the project. 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban Forestry Plan Requirements. An urban forestry plan shall: • Section 4 4-30 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect(the project landscape architect)or0 a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for Minor Land Partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the Tree Canopy Site Plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the Supplemental Report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Finding: This application, including the narrative, exhibits and plan drawings, demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the Urban Forestry Plan. The Tree Preservation and Removal Plan and the Tree Canopy & Planting Plan were prepared in coordination between the project landscape architect and a certified arborist. The supporting Arborist Report(Appendix D) was prepared by a certified arborist and meets standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. The Tree Canopy Plan and the Arborist Report clearly identify tree canopy coverage and soil volume calculations, in conformance with the Urban Forestry Manual. The Tree Preservation and Removal Plan was prepared to specifically meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan defined in the Urban Forestry Manual. The Tree Canopy & Planting Plan was prepared to specifically meet the requirements of the Tree Canopy Site Plan defined in the Urban Forestry Manual. As noted on the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan, individual trees near the development impact area were individually inventoried to include the location, size and species of the trees. The Tree Canopy& Planting Plan shows all trees to be preserved, as well as those to be planted within the development impact area of the project site. The Tree Canopy& Planting Plan • illustrates the application of the tree canopy requirements and includes specifications regarding the spacing and placement of trees, along with identification of tree stature and measurement. The Tree Preservation and Removal Plan identifies the trees to be removed as part of this development project. In all, five trees are proposed for removal to accommodate the proposed pocket park development. Four trees are invasive/nuisance species, and one is in decline and will be impacted by the proposed site development. In total, thirteen new trees are proposed for planting on the site to compensate for the tree removals, as well as increase canopy coverage. The two proposed vine maples will be understory trees dominated by the existing red cedars and will not impede the available growing space for the proposed bigleaf maple. It is the professional opinion of the project arborist that the vine maples are the most appropriate species for the chosen locations. See the Arborist Report and development drawings for specific details. These provisions are met. B. Tree Canopy Fee. If the Supplemental Report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets) or that the 15 percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for any individual lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 • Section 4 4-31 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent effective tree canopy cover), then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the Tree Canopy Fee Calculation Requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. Finding: As noted in the supplemental Arborist Report and Tree Canopy Study(Appendix D), the project as designed meets and exceeds the tree canopy coverage requirements as outlined in the Urban Forestry Manual. The provision does not apply, and no Tree Canopy Fee will be required of this application. C. Tree Canopy Fee Use. Tree canopy fees provided to the city shall be deposited into the Urban Forestry Fund and used as approved by council through a resolution. Finding: Advisory. 18.790.040 Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option (A-D) A. General Provisions. In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. B. Application Procedures. Discretionary urban forestry plan reviews shall be processed through a Type III procedure using approval criteria contained in Section 18.790.040.0 below. When a discretionary urban forestry plan review is submitted for concurrent Type III land use • review with one of the land use reviews types listed in Section 18.790.020, the review body will be the one designated for the land use review type listed in Section 18.790.020. If the discretionary urban forestry plan review is not concurrent with any other Type III land use review, then the review body shall be the hearings officer. C. Approval Criteria. A discretionary urban forestry plan review application will be approved if the review body finds that the applicant has shown that all of the applicable approval criteria are met... D. Decision. The discretionary urban forestry plan review decision shall be incorporated into the land use review decision types in Section 18.790.020. The discretionary urban forestry plan approved in this section shall supersede and replace any conflicting requirements in this chapter. However, all of the non-conflicting requirements in this chapter shall continue to apply. Finding: As noted above,this application demonstrates compliance with the provisions of Chapter 18.790 and the Urban Forestry Manual, as well as provides for the required tree canopy coverage. The Applicant does not request a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The provisions of this section do not apply. 18.790.050 Flexible Standards for Tree Planting and Preservation A. General Provisions. To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. To the extent that the standards in this section conflict with the standards in other sections of this title, the standards in this section shall apply except in cases where the director determines there would be an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or welfare. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part • Section 4 4-32 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are III eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Finding: The Applicant does not request the application of flexible standards for tree planting and preservation. The provisions of this section do not apply. B. Approval Provision for use of Flexible Standards. The review body may consider modifications for lot dimension standards or site-related development standards as part of the urban forestry plan review process. These modifications are done as part of the urban forestry plan review process and are not required to go through the adjustment process. In order to approve these modifications, the review body must find that the modification request is the least required to preserve and/or plant trees, that the modification will result in the preservation of or an addition to tree canopy on the lot, and that the modification will not impede adequate emergency access to the site. Finding: Advisory. C. Flexible Standards to Preserve or Plant Trees. The following flexible standards are available to applicants in order to preserve or plant trees on a development site. 1. Lot size averaging. To preserve existing trees in the development plan for any land partition under Chapter 18.420, lot size may be averaged to allow lots less than the minimum lot size required in the underlying zone as long as the average lot area is not less than that allowed by the underlying zone. No lot area shall be less than 80 percent of the minimum lot size allowed in the zone. Finding: The application is for a small pocket park,and the Applicant does not request the use of lot size averaging for the project. This provision does not apply. 11110 2. Adjustments to Setbacks. The following setback reductions will be allowed for lots preserving existing trees using the criteria in subsection a below. a. Reductions allowed: (i) Front yard—up to a 25 percent reduction of the dimensional standard for a front yard setback required in the base zone. Setback of garages may not be reduced by this provision. (ii) Other setbacks- up to a 20 percent reduction of the dimensional standards for other setbacks required in the base zone. Finding: The Applicant does not request an adjustment to setbacks. This provision does not apply. 3.Adjustments to Sidewalks. Location of a public sidewalk may be flexible in order to preserve existing trees or to plant new large stature street trees. Sidewalk location and design must be approved by the Development Engineer. For preservation, this flexibility shall be the minimum required to achieve the desired effect. For planting,preference shall be given to retaining the planter strip and separation between the curb and sidewalk wherever practicable. If a preserved tree is to be utilized as a street tree, it must meet the criteria found in the Landscaping and Screening Section 18.745.040.A.6. Finding: The Applicant does not request an adjustment to the location of the sidewalk for the project. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-33 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • 4. Adjustments to Commercial/Industrial/Civic Use Parking. For each 2 percent of effective canopy cover provided by preserved or planted trees incorporated into a development plan for commercial, industrial or civic uses listed in Section 18.765.080, Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements, a 1 percent reduction in the amount of required parking may be granted. No more than a 20 percent reduction in the required amount of parking may be granted for any one development. Finding: The Applicant does not request an adjustment to the amount of parking for the project. This provision does not apply. 5. Adjustments to Commercial/Industrial/Civic Use Landscaping. For each 2 percent of effective canopy cover provided by preserved trees incorporated into a development plan, a 1 percent reduction in the minimum landscape requirement may be granted No more than 20 percent of the minimum landscape requirement may be reduced for any one development. Finding: The Applicant does not request a landscaping adjustment. This provision does not apply. D. Flexible Standards and Incentives for the Preservation of Significant Tree Groves. A Significant Tree Grove Map is maintained by the director. The following additional flexible standards and incentives are available when a development site contains at least 10,000 square feet of tree canopy that is part of a significant tree grove and is not also within sensitive lands identified in Section 18.775.010.G.1-3. If any of these flexible standards and incentives are requested, the project arborist or landscape architect shall clearly demonstrate in the urban forestry plan consistency with the following provisions: • 1. Reduction of Minimum Density. The minimum density required by Section 18.510.040.B may be reduced to preserve a significant tree grove. The amount of reduction in minimum density shall be calculated as described in Chapter 18.715. Reduction of minimum density is permitted provided that: (a-c)... Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park and does not include residential development. The Applicant does not request a reduction in minimum density. These provisions do not apply. 2. Residential Density Transfer. Up to 100 percent density transfer is permitted from the preserved portion of a significant tree grove within a development site to the buildable area of the development site. (a-b)... Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park and does not include residential development. The Applicant does not request a density transfer. These provisions do not apply. 3. Adjustments to Commercial Development Standards. Adjustments to Commercial Development Standards (Table 18.520.2) of up to 50 percent reduction in minimum setbacks and up to 20 feet additional building height are permitted provided: (a-g)... Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park and does not include commercial development. These provisions do not apply. . Section 4 4-34 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 I 4. Adjustments to Industrial Development Standards. Adjustments to Development Standards in Industrial Zones (Table 18.530.2) of up to 50 percent reduction in minimum setbacks and up to 20 feet additional building height are permitted provided: (a-f)... Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park and does not include industrial development. These provisions do not apply. 5. Adjustment to Minimum Effective Tree Canopy Cover Requirement. The requirement for 15 percent effective tree canopy cover per lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R- 3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts is not required when: a. At least 50 percent of a significant tree grove's canopy within a development site (and not also within the sensitive lands types in Section 18.775.010.G.1-3) is preserved; b. The project arborist or landscape architect certifies the preservation is such that the connectivity and viability of the remaining significant tree grove is maximized while balancing the Significant Tree Grove Preservation Considerations in the Urban Forestry Manual; c. The applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover in Section 10,part 3, item N of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided for the overall development site (excluding streets); d. The significant tree grove is protected through an instrument or action subject to approval by the director that demonstrates it will be permanently preserved such as: (i)A conservation easement; (ii)An open space tract; (iii)A deed restriction; or (iv) Through dedication and acceptance by the city. • Finding: The Applicant does not request an adjustment to the minimum effective tree canopy coverage requirements. These provisions do not apply. 6. Adjustment to Street and Utility Standards. If requested, the director shall use his or her discretion when considering adjustments to Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards and Section 18.745.040, Street Trees provided: (a-b)... Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park, which does not include street improvements. The Applicant does not request an adjustment to Street and Utility Standards. These provisions do not apply. 18.790.060 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation A. General Provisions. An urban forestry plan shall be in effect from the point of land use approval until the director determines all applicable urban forestry plan conditions of approval and code requirements have been met. For subdivisions and partitions, the urban forestry plan shall remain in effect for each resulting lot or tract separately until the director determines all applicable urban forestry plan conditions of approval and code requirements have been met. Prior and subsequent permitting decisions regarding the planting, maintenance, removal and replacement of trees when not associated with one of the land use review types in Section 18.790.020.A shall be administered through Title 8(Urban Forestry) of the Tigard Municipal Code. • Section 4 4-35 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 Finding: The Applicant acknowledges that the urban forestry plan will be in effect from land use approval until the conditions of approval and code requirements have been met. This provision will be met. B. Inspections. Implementation of the urban forestry plan shall be inspected, documented and reported by the project arborist or landscape architect whenever an urban forestry plan is in effect. In addition, no person may refuse entry or access to the director for the purpose of monitoring the urban forestry plan on any site with an effective urban forestry plan. The Inspection Requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual shall apply to sites with an effective urban forestry plan. Finding: The Applicant acknowledges that the implementation of the urban forestry plan will be inspected,documented and reported by the project arborist. This provision will be met. C. Tree Establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the Tree Canopy Site Plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report(per 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the Tree Establishment Requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park via an initial Conditional Use Permit. The project is not include a previously approved urban forestry plan. The provision of this subsection does not apply. D. Urban Forest Inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the Urban Forestry Inventory Requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree • and area of stand grown trees in the Tree Canopy Site Plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report(per 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park via an initial Conditional Use Permit. The project is not include a previously approved urban forestry plan. The provision of this subsection does not apply. However,the Tree Canopy& Planting Plan and the Arborist Report(Appendix D)document and inventory existing and planned trees for the site. 18.790.070 Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of an Approved Land Use Permit A. General Provisions. Except as exempted in Section 18.790.070.8 below, any modification to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use permit shall be processed as a Type I land use decision as described below. B. Exemptions. The following activities shall be exempt from the Type I Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of an Approved Land Use Permit process: C. Application Procedures. Modifications to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use permit that are not exempted by 18.790.070.B shall be processed as a Type I procedure, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.790.070.D below. D. Approval Criteria. The director shall approve the modification to the urban forestry plan component of an approved land use permit upon determining: Finding: This application is for the development of a small pocket park via an initial Conditional Use Permit. The project is not part of a previously approved land use permit. The provisions of this subsection do not apply. Section 4 4-36 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • Visual Clearance Area (Chapter 18.795) 18.795.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Finding: This application is to request a change in use to Community Recreation and for the installation of a small playground at a city-owned pocket park.No structures exist or are proposed. As noted in this narrative,the proposed project does not anticipate an increase in parking or loading requirements, and Community Recreation uses(except dog parks)are not required to have parking. The half street frontage improvements exist and include sidewalk, planter strip and street trees.No curb cuts or vehicular access is proposed. Therefore,the standards of this chapter do not apply. • Street and Utility Improvement Standards (Chapter 18.810) 18.810.020 General Provisions A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs and other public improvements shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title... Finding: As per the Pre-application Conference Notes, street improvements are not required for this project. The development of this site does not trigger the need for additional improvements to SW 74th Avenue. D. Adjustments. Adjustments to the provisions in this chapter related to street improvements may be granted by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.030.C.9. Finding: The applicant is not requesting any Special Adjustment for the proposed project. 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. Finding: The site fronts onto SW 74th Avenue,which is a public street in compliance with this requirement. S Section 4 4-37 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. Finding: Demonstration of compliance is provided below. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter,provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. Finding: SW 74th Avenue has been previously improved to meet the standards of this chapter. There are no street improvements proposed or required with this project. This provision does not apply. 4 Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter; Finding: There are no street improvements proposed with this project. This provision does not apply. 5. If the City could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: Finding: This provision is not required,as the applicant is not proposing any improvements that would trigger a need for street improvements. • 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specifications adopted by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 18.810.020.B. Finding: This is advisory. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, bodies of water, significant habitat areas, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval authority may also approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approval authority shall balance the benefit of the adjustment with the impact on the public interest represented by the standards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030.E.1. An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Finding: There are no street improvements proposed or required with this project. This provision does not apply. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final subdivision plat or major partition; however, the Council may approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed,provided that such street is deemed essential by the Council for the purpose of general traffic circulation. • Section 4 4-38 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Finding: The proposed park project abuts existing public right-of-way,and neither a subdivision • plat nor major partition are proposed for the subject property.No new rights-of-way are proposed with this application. This standard does not apply. C. Creation of access easements. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this title... Finding: No new access easements are proposed. These standards do not apply. Sections D-I--related to development of new streets. Finding: No new streets are proposed with this application. These standards do not apply. J. Existing rights-of-way. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall be provided at the time of subdivision or development. Finding: The applicant has included an impact study (Section 3)as required and has demonstrated that there will be no increased impact upon the transportation, sewer, stormwater or water systems, and it will positively improve the City's level of service with regard to the provision of developed park land. As per the Pre-application Conference Notes, no additional right-of-way dedications are required of this project, and therefore,there is no mitigated or unmitigated impact on the street system. K Partial street improvements. Partial street improvements resulting in a pavement width of less than 20 feet; while generally not acceptable, may be approved where essential to reasonable development when in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, and when it IP will be practical to require the improvement of the other half when the adjoining property developed. Finding: No partial street improvements are proposed. This provision does not apply. L. Culs-de-sacs. A cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: Finding: No cul-de-sacs are proposed. This provision does not apply. M Street names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets in Washington County, except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the surrounding area and as approved by the City Engineer. Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. N. Grades and curves. Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. 0. Curbs, curb cuts, ramps, and driveway approaches. Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080... II Section 4 4-39 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • Finding: No new streets, curbs or curb ramps are proposed. This provision does not apply. P. Streets adjacent to railroad right-of-way. Wherever the proposed development contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way,provision shall be made for a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land Finding: The proposed project is not adjacent to a railroad right-of-way. This provision does not apply. Q. Access to arterials and collectors. Where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. Finding: The proposed project is not a residential development. This provision does not apply. R. Alleys,public or private. Finding: No alleys are proposed. This provision does not apply. S. Survey monuments. Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by the City, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to provide certification to the City that all boundary and interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. • T. Private streets. Finding: No private streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. U. Railroad crossings. Where an adjacent development results in a need to install or improve a railroad crossing, the cost for such improvements may be a condition of development approval, or another equitable means of cost distribution shall be determined by the public works Director and approved by the Commission. Finding: The proposed project is not adjacent to a railroad,and no railroad crossings are required. This provision does not apply. V. Street signs. The City shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. Finding: No new streets or street signs are proposed. This provision does not apply. W. Mailboxes. Joint mailbox facilities shall be provided in all residential developments, with each joint mailbox serving at least two dwelling units. Finding: The proposed project is not a residential development. This provision does not apply. X Traffic signals. The location of traffic signals shall be noted on approved street plans. Finding: No new streets or traffic signals are proposed. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-40 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 Y. Street light standards. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with regulations adopted II by the City's direction. Finding: No new street lights are proposed. A street light currently stands along the frontage of the completed half street adjacent to the subject parcel. This provision does not apply. Z. Street name signs. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required Finding: No new streets are proposed. Street name signs exist at intersections adjacent to the subject property. This provision does not apply. AA. Street cross-sections. The final lift of asphalt concrete pavement shall be placed on all new constructed public roadways prior to final City acceptance of the roadway and within one year of the conditional acceptance of the roadway unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Finding: No newly constructed public roadways are proposed. This provision does not apply. AB. Traffic calming. When, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the proposed development will create a negative traffic condition on existing neighborhood streets, such as excessive speeding, the developer may be required to provide traffic calming measures. Finding: The proposed project is for the development of a pocket park.No new street development or parking are proposed. The proposed park development is not anticipated to create negative traffic conditions on the existing streets. This provision does not apply. AC. Traffic study. Subsections 1 & 2... Finding: The proposed pocket park is not anticipated to attract users from outside the immediate II neighborhood. The ITE Trip Generation Manual has limited information given for parks, especially small pocket parks. This project is designed to encourage increased pedestrian activity. Based upon previous trip generation studies conducted within the greater Portland metro region, average peak hour trip end rates have been estimated at approximately 1.65 per acre of neighborhood parkland. The proposed development is a 0.25-acre neighborhood park,and the anticipated peak trips generated is less than one. 18.810.040 Blocks(A-B) --related to creation of new blocks Finding: These provisions do not apply, as the creation of new blocks is not part of this proposal. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development traversed by a watercourse, or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. Finding: No easements are required, since no new utilities are proposed with this application. This standard does not apply. B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the City, the applicable district and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The City's standard width Section 4 4-41 • City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 1111 for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. Finding: All utilities necessary to service the site are available without the need to create new easements. Section 18.810.060 Lots(A-E) --related to the creation of new lots Finding: These provisions do not apply as the subject lot is pre-existing, and no new lots are being created as part of this proposal. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. Finding: A sidewalk exists along the site's frontage with SW 74th Avenue in compliance with this provision. This provision is met. B. Requirement of developers. 1. As part of any development proposal, or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day, an applicant shall be required to idents direct, safe (1.25 x the straight line distance)pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to all transit facilities and Neighborhood Activity Centers (schools,parks, libraries, etc.). In addition, the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-site if justified by the development. Finding: As discussed in this narrative, the proposed site improvements to add a wood chip pathway and playground is anticipated to have minimal additional traffic generation (and far below the 1,000 vehicle trip threshold). As no development is proposed other than minor site improvements,the proportionality to require frontage improvements with this approval is not met. This standard does not apply. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk, on the same side of the street as the development, within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). Finding: Half street improvements, including a sidewalk,were previously installed along the frontage of the subject property. The sidewalk is continuous on the east side of 74th Avenue north of the project site.No sidewalk exists on the east side of 74th Avenue south of the project site. There is no existing sidewalk south of the project site within 300 feet,and no opportunity exists to extend a sidewalk to meet an existing sidewalk. This provision does not apply. C. Planter strip requirements. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; it would conflict with the utilities, there are significant natural features • Section 4 4-42 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 (large trees, water features, significant habitat areas, etc) that would be destroyed if the • sidewalk were located as required, or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street(15 feet or less). Additional consideration for exempting the planter strip requirement may be given on a case-by-case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. Finding: As shown on the Site Development Plan,a 5 foot wide planter strip exists along the site's frontage of 74th Avenue in compliance with this provision. This provision is met. D. Sidewalks in central business district. Finding: This project is not located within the central business district. This provision does not apply. E. Maintenance. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. Finding: This is a standard provision that property owners are responsible for the maintenance of the public sidewalk along their respective street frontages. The applicant will comply by this requirement. F. Application for permit and inspection. If the construction of a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person,firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering Department to so build or construct: 1. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. • Finding: The applicant does not propose any street or sidewalk improvements. This provision does not apply. 2. The City Engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor... Finding: The applicant does not intend to request for delay of the construction of the public sidewalk. This provision does not apply. 3. The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. Finding: This provision is advisory. G. Council initiation of construction. In the event one or more of the following situations are found by the Council to exist, the Council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with City ordinances. Finding: None of these situations exist. This provision does not apply. 18.810.080 Public Use Areas (A-B) --related to the dedication and acquisition of parkland Finding: The proposed project is for a community recreation use on a city park property. This application does not include the development of a subdivision,a land division, or public use areas. These standards do not apply. S Section 4 4-43 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments)and the adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: Sanitary sewer exists within SW 74th Avenue along the frontage, and no modifications regarding sanitary sewer service are proposed. This standard is met. B. Sewer plan approval. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. Finding: No new sewer lines are proposed. This provision does not apply. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: No new sewer lines are proposed with this application, and there is adequate sewer service to accommodate the site. This provision does not apply. D. Permits denied. Development permits may be restricted by the Commission or Hearings Officer where a deficiency exists in the existing sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will result in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of state or federal standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatment system. IIFinding: No new sewer lines are proposed with this application, and there is no known deficiency in the existing sewer system. This provision does not apply. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff have been made, and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. Finding: The majority of the park site will remain as pervious landscaping, resulting in very little storm water from the proposed trails leaving the site. The water quality and quantity requirements for the two parcels comprising Senn Park were addressed previously as part of the construction of the Ash Creek Estates subdivision. Storm water runoff from the proposed park project will drain to the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of the Ash Creek Estates project. The proposed Senn Park will create less new impervious surfaces(956 sf)than would have been created if two homes had been constructed on these lots. Refer to the Storm Water calculations in Appendix F for the water quality and quantity measures that were constructed for the two parcels. This provision is met. B. Easements. Where a development is traversed by a watercourse, drainageway, channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming 0 Section 4 4-44 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 substantially with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for • conveyance and maintenance. Finding: The proposed improvements do not traverse a water course,and no additional storm water easements or drainage rights-of-way should be required. This provision does not apply. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runofffrom its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, and: 1. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Finding: There is no known upstream drainage that would impact this site. This provision does not apply. D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Finding: There should be no additional runoff from the site. The minor pathway and playground improvements will produce very little additional drainage. This provisions of this section do not • apply. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all arterial and collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. 2. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or rights-of-way,provided such dedication is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. 3. Any new street improvement project shall include bicycle lanes as required in this document and on the adopted bicycle plan. Finding: The adjacent frontage of SW 74th Avenue is classified as Neighborhood Street, and no bike lanes are identified along this roadway in the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan. The provisions of this section (18.810.110.A - C)do not apply. 18.810.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground... S Section 4 4.45 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 1111 Finding: There are no new utilities proposed for this site,and utilities have been previously undergrounded with past improvements to SW 74th Avenue. This provision does not apply. B. Information on development plans. The applicant for a development shall show on the development plan or in the explanatory information, easements for all underground utility facilities... Finding: There are no new utilities proposed for this site. This provision does not apply. C. Exception to undergrounding requirement Finding: There are no new utilities proposed for this site. This provision does not apply. D. Fee in-lieu of undergrounding Finding: There will be no utility work done on this site. This provision does not apply. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required A. Guarantee. All improvements installed by the developer shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City Council. B. Cash deposit or bond. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. C. Compliance requirements. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.430.090. Finding: No public improvements are proposed that warrant a cash or bond payment. These standards do not apply. III18.810.140 Monuments A. Replacement required. Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the subdivider shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the improvements. Finding: A land division is not proposed, however any monuments disturbed during the construction of the proposed site modifications will be replaced. This standard is met. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite A. Approval required. No public improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the City,permit fee paid, and permit issued. Finding: The building permit process is the vehicle by which such permits are issued by the City Engineer. This requirement will be met. B. Permit fee. The permit fee is required to defray the cost and expenses incurred by the City for construction and other services in connection with the improvement. The permit fee shall be set by Council resolution Finding: The applicant will pay all applicable fees related to the submission of the building permit package in compliance with this requirement. 18.810.160 Installation Conformation A. Conformance required. In addition to other requirements, improvements installed by the developer either as a requirement of these regulations or at his/her own option, shall conform to 111 Section 4 4-46 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 the requirements of this chapter and to improvement standards and specifications followed byIV the City. Finding: Compliance to this requirement will be demonstrated in the final inspection prior to the issuing of the occupancy permit. This requirement will be met. B. Adopted installation standards. The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Oregon Chapter A.P.W.A., and Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments)shall be a part of the City's adopted installation standard(s); other standards may also be required upon recommendation of the City Engineer. Finding: The applicant's civil engineer has designed all improvements to meet the city's standards, per this requirement. 18.810.170 Plan Check A. Submittal requirements. Work shall not begin until construction plans and construction estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the City Engineer in writing. The developer can obtain detailed information about submittal requirements from the City Engineer. Finding: The building permit submission is the vehicle by which the City Engineer approves all proposed improvements. B. Compliance. All such plans shall be prepared in accordance with requirements of the City. Finding: This is advisory. 18.810.180 Notice to City III A. Commencement. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. Finding: This is advisory. B. Resumption. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. Finding: This is advisory. 18.810.190 City Inspection A. Inspection of improvements. Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City. The City may require changes in typical sections and details if unusual conditions arising during construction warrant such changes in the public interest. Finding: This is advisory. 18.810.200 Engineer's Certification A. Written certification required. The developer's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade,prior to City acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereoffor operation and maintenance. Finding: This is advisory. • Section 4 4-47 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24, 2013 • Appendix B. Neighborhood Meeting Notes • • Appendix B B-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 MEETING NOTES TIGARD PROJECT NUMBER: #92045 ISSUE DATE: August 1,2013 PROJECT NAME: Senn Park RECORDED BY: Steve Duh TO: FILE PRESENT: Members of the public Steve Martin—City of Tigard Steve Duh—Conservation Technix SUBJECT: Public Meeting Notes(08/01/13) INFORMATION ITEMS 1. Steve Duh opened the meeting,welcomed the attendees and read the city-required Statement of Purpose to acknowledge this meeting as the public meeting related to a pending land use application. He offered a summary of the park master plan,noted the pending land use review process and recognized the passage of • the 2010 Parks Bond,which is funding the design and permitting for the Senn Park project. 2. Program elements include but are not limited to: a. Playground—along the upper shelf on the south side of the site;specific play fixtures have not yet been selected.The City is asking for feedback on the desired types of equipment. b. Pathway—a wood chip path connection down the slope into the adjacent City-owned open space 3. Updated information will be posted to the City's website as the project progresses. PARTICIPANT COMMENTS/QUESTIONS Responses are italicized. 1. Comment: I like the more kinesthetic play equipment. The traditional equipment (slides, swings) are at Metzger Park and other nearby parks. 2. Have you considered making the site a dog park instead?1 hisproperry was specifically purchased to serve as a small pocket park for neighbors of the immediate area,since there are few other parks nearby.Also, the City's development code requires a minimum of five parking stalls for any dog park location, and this site could not accommodate that. 3. Comment:Novelty and variety is nice for the playground. 4. Comment:SW 74th Avenue is a busy street with some speeding down the hill.I am concerned that having a playground on a busy street will result in limited usability of the site. Have you considered user safety? The City has other parks along bury streets(i.e.,Bull Mountain Road),and safety is always a design consideration.At this location, the City will consider black vinyl fencing along 74th Avenue to enhance user safety. 5. Is lighting from the street light the only light for the park? Yes,no additional lighting is proposed with the project. • Public Meeting Notes(08/01/13) • Senn Park Project Number#92045 Page 2 6. Comment:The newer kinesthetic equipment is fun and different.Metzger Park has a good,tall slide.Don't place a slide at this park;do something a little different with the equipment. 7. I am concerned about the bright colors for play equipment. How about adding more natural looking elements,such as the stepping stones or boulders? Me design options include some natural play elements such as steppingstones and small boulders. Specific play equipment types and color schemes have not yet been selected. 8. How often will maintenance staff be at the park? Once a property is developed as a park,City maintenance staff will visit it daily,in addition to monthly playground inspections. 9. Does this development include the adjacent open space? This project is only for the 0.25-acre pocket park. The adjacent open space, while City owned,is not part of the development proposal.A small wood chip trail is proposed from the pocket park to provide access into the open space, but not improvements to the open space are planned. 10. What is the project budget? The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has earmarked,$50,000for thisproject,which includes the site design and land use process. 11. What are the next steps in the process and for the development?This neighborhood meeting is the primary venue for comments until the land use application is submitted Once it is submitted, the City will inform nearby residents of the application and seek additional comment.Alio, the project requires review and approval by the Hearings Officer,so another opportunity exists for comment at the public hearing for the project.Following the land use review process,the City anticipates starting construction on this site this coming fall/winter. 12. Comment: I live across the street and have a clear view of the park. I would like to see some screening or plantings to block the view of the play equipment. Consider shifting the location of the play elements further east. 13. Comment:Tot lots can be hard to get them activated.Be sure to pick a good selection of play equipment • that fit the space and will be interesting/used by the kids. At the close of the meeting,there was general consensus from participants in favor of the proposed park design. Every effort has been made to accurately record this meeting. If any errors or omissions are noted,please provide written response within five days of receipt. cc: Steve Martin Project File • I • • 6,..." Pra Senn Park: Neighborhood Meeting -„ , : August 1,2013 CONTACT SHEET NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS '')C' i 0r �' .3,37 i)ao 00TH /D2..3 ,. ZrZa-,q- /„ ''j 0/e/ .7ritk S'I City of Tigard Public Works Department Parks Division TIGARD Notice of Community Meeting July 15, 2013 RE: An Invitation to Shape the Future of Senn Park When: Thursday,August 1, 2013 — 6:30 p.m. Where: Tigard Public Works Building—Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham Street In 2007, the City of Tigard purchased two adjoining residential lots in your neighborhood; the city planned to develop a pocket park. The .25-acre Senn Park is located at 9852 SW 74th Avenue, opposite Red Cedar Way and adjacent to a 4.5-acre greenspace along Ash • Creek. In 2009, community meetings were held to discuss design concepts for this park. The city now is ready to begin developing the park and is preparing to submit a land use application to change the property's use classification from residential to community recreation. A vicinity map—showing the park and surrounding area—can be found on the back of this notice. At the upcoming August 1 meeting, city staff will be on hand to discuss the park design and land use permitting process. Initial park improvements may include the installation of playground equipment, landscaping and a trail connection to the adjacent greenspace. Neighboring property owners and residents are invited to share their ideas for the park at this meeting. The original park design concepts are posted on the city's website: www.tigard-or.gov/community/parks/senn park.asp In November 2010, Tigard voters passed a $17 million park and open space bond measure. Money from the bond will be used to finalize the park design, obtain land use permits and make initial park improvements. If you have questions, or if you cannot attend the meeting and would like to comment, contact Public Works Manager Steve Martin at 503.718.2583 or stove@tigard-or.gov. • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov City of Tigard Senn Park-Vicinity Map _a .-.r .1J `� --t _ -1 - .r-' J ._-.1 s.:a J .r� - I�t{A D Y L N } CHESINLIF ST 1 j J .,_1 s;--a ---I.r-I_....1 J f J 1 J" .J' LnL_ A LN ,,' � - f J -- .'` ,' -' LLMWooD Sr ' � ✓ fi J J__.1 J -I J .` j J z J -J_,J f . j J .r" J j 'r .t 3 ` —.1 J� .J J J J•J 4 S f (-7.R E E FC C T --a J J -' 1 J Project Area -J `'� ) J—J _� _•{c. .� RED CEDAR W J, Vf N� URA �; r _}-° a -- .0".:.77.„ JJJ --' J �J-J' JJJJ J z •J .. _J VLNTURA L) : - LANDAU S T- -IJ J i 1 _ J -a ,-1 _J .� J .r -J J _1 J 7CITH �'L''� J _i < _J J w J `` J •i J J J J J ..fl '--1-.1,n1-- J�fi d a '.17,-; , � ""'! J J Cr J J J J�1rJ L. ()CUST SI z - _, J J1 _1 J J _! r.4 1 r1 J j IA.,-�J ®! r- .1 . ___I .J J .J J -•-J -J 4 J J -J J I -,1 J 1j J .-, 1- J I , I 1 • • • Typical Questions to HelpEnsure Common Yp T[GAR II Neighborhood Concerns are Considered The following is a list of questions intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for proposed development in your area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to address your own unique concerns and interests. PROCESS ► What applications are you(the developer) applying for?When do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it?What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal? ► Will the decision on the application be made by city staff,hearings officer,Tigard Planning Commission or City Council? How long is the process? (timing) ► At what point in the process are citizens given notice and the opportunity to provide input? ► Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard staff? • Have any preliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? • What city planner did you speak with regarding this project? (This person is generally the planner assigned to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information). STREETS • ► Will there be a traffic study done?What are the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? ► What street improvements (including sidewalks) are proposed?What connections to existing streets are proposed? ► Are streets proposed to be public or private?What are the proposed street and sidewalk widths? ► What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements? ZONING AND DENSITY ► What is the current zoning?What uses are allowed under this zoning? ► Will there be a re-zone requested by the developer?If yes,to what zone? ► How many units are proposed for the development and what is the minimum and maximum number of units allowed in the zone? DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ► What is your erosion control and drainage plan?What is the natural slope of the property?What are the grading plans? ► Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located?Who will own and maintain the facility? TREES AND LANDSCAPING ► What are the tree removal plans and what is proposed to mitigate for trees removed? ► What are the landscaping plans?What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • ► How do I request more information or a follow-up meeting from/with the applicant? �' TIGARD Neighborhood Meeting Information • The City of Tigard requires developers to hold a neighborhood meeting to notify affected property owners about their proposed development. This is done as part of the development review process for most land use applications. Below are some frequently asked questions about the neighborhood meeting process. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they are planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of their proposed development and to let them know what issues or concerns you have in regard to their proposal. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? After the neighborhood meeting,the prospective developer finalizes their submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the city. Sometimes it takes awhile before the developer's application is ready to submit, so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the city, staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed complete,the formal application review begins. It takes approximately six to eight weeks from the time the 41) application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications require a public hearing at which citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concerns. Property owners within 500 feet will be notified after a complete application is submitted. They will be provided an opportunity to comment. Any appeals are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. WHAT IF THE PROPOSAL PRESENTED AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IS NOT WHAT IS ACTUALLY SUBMITTED? Applicants are not required to submit exactly what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is significantly different,a new neighborhood meeting would be required as determined by staff. HOW DO I KNOW WHAT ISSUES ARE VALID? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code (also known as the Community Development Code).Review the city's development code to familiarize yourself with what is permitted and what may not be permitted. A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigard Public Library,on the city's web site at www.tigard-or.gov,or a copy may be purchased by contacting our records division www.tigard-or.gov/city_hall/services/public_records/. You may also contact city planning staff by calling 503-718-2421 and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. If a development meets the code standards,it can proceed. For your assistance, attached is a list of questions that may assist you in determining your position on a particular proposal. • 1111 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE W'ORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT TIIE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: / �� I, 5¢ o.,4r/'1�/°r�7/.� being duly sworn,depose and say that on the /(� day of . r , 20/_,I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed develol mens at (or near) ?Sa8 s...) 7y v.¢__ ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at /f ,4-,,..4c2_t_c)ie with postage prepaid thereon. ______. -- friat...- Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: • I.,_ -, .4-7...x,.._.) ,do affirm that I am(represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for �5.e.v...) PA-2K affecting the land located at(state the approximate location(s)IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currendy registered) 78 av S ,S' 7 i/�`'• ,and did on the t4 day of _ ! of/ 20_a___ personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Fri;.A../G land use application,and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. / The sign was posted a?farig S !.J ? TJ Gil/-/j o,tR ,) (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the presence of a Notaty Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF 1)QFCz(3,tl i ) County of W/t3r11A1G7)LJ ) ss. • Subscribed and swom/affin ned before me on the i I day of -�tbd ,20 /3 . I''w. OFFICIAL SEAL 4[c"r NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON �, TON NO.461407 -77,}74.---�l ':47 ,,,� COMMISSION _ 7":") MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBER 10,2015 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: //)-/(.)-/S" • i\avpin\n ste oeighboth od mating\of id,vic of moifr-posting neighbor ood"etingdoc Page 5 • Appendix C. Service Provider Letter • 0 Appendix C C-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 JUL 0 8 2013 Clean Water Services File Number • CleanWateer Services 13 - 00 8(o3 By — t Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment 1. Jurisdiction: Tigard 2. Property Information(example 1S234A801400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): Name: Steve Martin,Parks and Facilities Manager 1S125DC,Lots 09500&09600(Senn Park) Company: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd Site Address: 9868 SW 74th Ave City, State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223 City, State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223 Phone/Fax: 503-718-2583 Nearest Cross Street: Red Cedar Way E-Mail: steve@tigard-or.gov 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Steve Martin f,] Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company: City of Tigard U Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd U Residential Subdivision 1:jCommercial Subdivision ❑ Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial City, State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223 Other Phone/Fax: 503-718-2583 minor improvement to install playground on propert E-Mail: steve@tigard-or.gov 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? U Yes XI No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work • 7. Additional comments or Information that may be needed to understand your project Senn Park is comprised of 2 parcels platted in 2007;fenced along south side as setback from Ash Ck This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law, "t By signing this form,the Owner or Owners authorized agent or representative,admowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Print/Type Name Steve Martin Print/Type Title Parks and Streets Manager ONLINE SUBMITTAL Date 7/6/2013 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and •approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law. • ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially • sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. �7, Li This Service Provider Letter Is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. /\S h Greek vw�� A+eS f TAThe proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot wasrlatted after 9/9195 ORS 92.040( NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVI =R LETTER IS REQUIRED. � ,(p • Reviewed by Date v !/v 0/3 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • Phone.(503)681-5100 • Fax:(503)681-4439 • www.cleanwaterservices.org 1110 Appendix D. Arborist Report Et Tree Canopy Study • • Appendix D D-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • 971.409.9354 Morgan Nolen 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 Alf OCIATEf Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net Urban Forestry Plan Supplemental Report September 20, 2013 • Senn Park Tigard, Oregon • • 971.409.9354 • Morgan Nolen 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 6'w &IJOCIAT Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net Table of Contents— Purpose 1 General Description 1 Effective Tree Canopy Cover 1 Specifications 2 A. Tree Protection Specifications 2 B.Soil Characteristics and Specifications for Improvement 2 C. Tree Planting Specifications 3 Signature of Approval 3 Enclosures — Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Attachment B: Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary • Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Attachment D:Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment E:Tree Canopy Site Plan Not Applicable— Existing Stand Inventory Data Planted Stand Inventory Stand Preservation Specifications Stand Planting Specifications Tree Canopy Fee Calculation III • 971.409.9354 Morgan Nolen 971.409.9354 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 AffOCIATLf Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net Urban Forestry Plan - Supplemental Report Senn Park, Tigard, Oregon September 20, 2013 M HA1318 Purpose This Urban Forestry Plan for the Senn Park project is for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)to improve a public park in an R-4.5 zoning district at 9868 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon, provided pursuant to the City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. This report describes the existing trees located on the project site, provides arborist recommendations for tree removal, retention and protection, and describes the effective tree canopy cover needed to meet City requirements.This report is based on observations made by International Society of Arboriculture (ISA)Certified Arborists Morgan Nolen (PN-6145A) and Todd Prager(WE-6723A) during site visits conducted in July 2013. General Description The existing site consists of two undeveloped lots (lots 28 and 29)that are not distinguished from each other. The western portion of the project site is without trees and is primarily flat and grassy at the southern end.There is an existing planting strip with small street trees located in the public right-of-way along 74th Avenue.The eastern portion of the project site is dominated by western redcedar(Thuja • plicata)trees, which connect to a remnant offsite grove. The northern portion of the site slopes steeply towards Ash Creek. In general,the western redcedars on the site have thin foliage and appear to be stressed and declining.This is likely the result of changes in site hydrology and exposure to increased light and heat when surrounding trees were removed with development less than a decade ago. Six existing trees are suitable for preservation with construction.A complete description of individual trees located on and adjacent to the project site is included in the enclosed existing tree inventory data (attachment A). Effective Tree Canopy Cover A summary of the effective tree canopy cover by lot and across the overall development site is included as attachment B. Lot 28 is 4,858 square feet and has 149%effective tree canopy cover. Lot 29 is 6,224 square feet and has 245%effective tree canopy cover.The minimum required effective tree canopy for lots 28 and 29 is 15% each;therefore,the effective tree canopy cover requirement is met for both lots. The overall development site is 11,082 square feet and has 203%effective tree canopy.The minimum required effective tree canopy for the overall development site is 40%;therefore, the effective tree canopy cover requirement for the overall development site is also met. The enclosed Planted Tree Inventory (attachment C) describes 13 trees proposed for planting, including nine new trees on and directly adjacent to lot 28 and four new trees on lot 29. The Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan are enclosed as attachments D • and E as required by Section 10 of the Urban Forestry Manual,which illustrate how the Urban Forestry Plan requirements are met. • Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Senn Park,Tigard,Oregon Page 2 • Specifications A. Tree Protection Specifications 1. Tree Protection Zone.The project arborist shall designate the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Where feasible,the TPZ shall be established at the dripline of protected trees as a minimum. If infrastructure must be installed closer to the trees,the TPZ may be established within the dripline area if the project arborist determines that the trees will not be unduly damaged. The location of the TPZ shall be shown on construction drawings. 2. Protection Fencing.All trees to be retained shall be protected by chain link or other fencing as approved by the project arborist. Protection fencing shall be secured to steel posts placed no further than 15 feet apart and shall be installed at the edge of the TPZ. 3. Preconstruction Conference.The project arborist shall be on site to discuss methods of tree removal and tree protection prior to any construction. 4. Pruning.The project arborist can help identify where pruning is necessary once trees recommended for removal have been removed and the site is staked and prepared for construction. Pruning shall be performed by a Qualified Tree Service. 5. Tree Protection Zone Maintenance.The protection fencing shall not be moved, removed, or entered by equipment except under direction of the project arborist. 6. Storage of Material or Equipment.The contractor shall not store materials or • equipment within the TPZ. 7. Excavation. Excavation within the TPZ shall be avoided if alternatives are available. If excavation within the TPZ in unavoidable, the project arborist shall evaluate the proposed excavation to determine methods to minimize impacts to trees. All construction within the TPZ shall be under the on-site technical supervision of the project arborist. 8. Tree Protection Inspection.The project arborist shall inspect and verify the location of protection measures prior to construction, monitor tree protection measures regularly, and provide biweekly written reports to the City during periods of active construction. 9. Final Report. After the project has been completed,the project arborist shall provide a final report that describes the measures needed to maintain and protect the remaining trees. B. Soil Characteristics and Specifications for Improvement Native soils at the project site consist of Helvetia silt loam, which are deep and moderately well-drained. They are capable of supporting healthy tree growth and no improvements are necessary or proposed.The soils in the planting strip consist of well drained, amended top soils that were installed with the improvement of 74th Avenue. No soil amendments are necessary or proposed for the planting strip. If soil compaction occurs during construction, the project arborist shall provide additional recommendations as needed. • Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Senn Park,Tigard,Oregon • Page 3 C. Tree Planting Specifications New trees that are planted to meet the effective canopy requirements shall conform to the applicable standards in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual.They shall be planted in accordance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards for tree planting (A300, Part 6) and additional standards adopted by the Oregon Landscape Contractors Board. Nursery stock shall meet the requirements of the American Association of Nurserymen for nursery stock(ANSI Z60.1)for Grade No.1 or better. Double stake trees if needed for stability. Signature of Approval We hereby attest that,to the best of our knowledge: ✓ The attached Tree Preservation and Removal site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; ✓ The attached Tree Canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual; and ✓ This Supplemental Report meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Thank you for choosing Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC,to provide consulting arborist services for the Senn Park project. Please contact us if you have questions or need any additional information. Thank you, • Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC: Morga E. Holen, Owner ISA Certified Arborist, PN-6145A ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Forest Biologist In association with Todd Prager&Associates, LLC: Todd Prager, Subconsultant ISA Certified Arborist, WE-6723A Enclosures: Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Attachment B: Effective Tree Cai.opy Cover Summary Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Attachment D:Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment E:Tree Canopy Site Plan • MHA1318 Senn Park-Tree Inventory Data 9-20-13 F� Morgan 1 IQienAttachment A:Existing Tree Inventory Data AffOCIATL/ I Page 1of2 No. Lot No. Type Common Name Species Name DBH1 C-Rad2 Canopy3 O/S° HTs Cond6 Pres' Comments Treatment 79 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 24 15 707 S N 2' 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 86 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 10 15 707 S N 1 1 declining protect adjacent tree 201 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 23 15 707 S N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 209 offsite con Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 38 25 1963 S N 2 2 protect adjacent tree 210 29 dec Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum 16 24 1809 S N 2 2 poor stem structure;some decay retain 211 29 con English holly Ilex aquifolium 7 7 154 S N 1 1 nuisance species remove 221, 29 con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 36 18 1017 S N 2 2 monitor condition retain 223 29 con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 23 18 1017 S N 2 2 thin canopy;monitor condition retain 235 29 con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 31 18 1017 S N 1 1 declining;monitor condition retain 302 29 con Western red cedar Thuja plicata l 20 18 1017 S N 2 2 monitor condition retain 621 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 30 20 1256 S N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 623 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 25 15 707 S N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 631 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 10 15 707 S N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 642 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicatai 24 10 314 5 N 2 2 conflict w/neighbor's retaining wall protect adjacent tree 649 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 30 15 707 S N 2 2 protect adjacent tree 659 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 24 10 314 S N 2 2 protect adjacent tree 662 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 27 20 1256 S N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 663 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 20 5 79 S N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 1261 offsite dec Norway maple Acer platanoides 4 9 254 0 N 3 3 nuisance species protect adjacent tree 1273 offsite dec Norway maple Acer platanoides 4 9 254 0 i N 3 3 nuisance species protect adjacent tree 1274 28 dec Norway maple Acer platanoides 4 8 201 0 N 3 3 nuisance species remove 1275 28 dec Norway maple Acer platanoides 3 5 79 0 N 3 3 nuisance species remove 1302 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 36 15 707 5 N 1 1 declining protect adjacent tree 1324 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 10 15 707 5 N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree 1325 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 1 11 15 707 5 N 1 1 top dieback protect adjacent tree 1326 offsite con Western red cedar Thuja plicata 19 15 707 S N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 • morgan.holen@coneet 1971.409.9354 • • • MHA1318 Senn Park-Tree Inventory Data 9-20-13 Morgan l�olen Attachment A:Existing Tree Inventory Data i- A/IIOCJATL Page2of2 No. Lot No. Type Common Name Species Name DBH1 C-Rad2 Canopy; 0/S4 HTs Gond Pres Comments Treatment 1328 offsite icon Western red cedar Thuja plicata 20 20 1256 S I N 2 2 thin canopy protect adjacent tree i 1337 294con English holly Ilex aquifolium 6' 10 314 S N 2 1 nuisance species I remove i 1342 29'con Western red cedar ,Thuja plicata 301 1411 6151 S N 1 1 old broken top,cavity in south stem remove 1349 291con Western red cedar Thuja plicata I 33 20 1256 S N 2' 2 thin canopy retain 1DBH is tree diameter measured at 4.5-feet above the ground level,in inches. 2C-Rad is the average crown radius measured in feet. 3Canopy is the average tree canopy area(in square feet)calculated as follows:Canopy=(Average Tree Canopy Spread/2)2 x it. 40/SG identies the trees as either Open Grown or Stand Grown the average crown radius measured in feet. sHT identifies whether or not the tree is a Heritage Tree(either Y for yes or N for no). 6Cond is the numerical condition rating(0-3)as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING VIGOR CANOPY DENSITY DEADWOOD FAILURE HISTORY PESTS DECAY 0 dead to severe decline <30% major scaffold branches >1 scaffold Infested major conks and cavities 1 declining 30-60% twig and branch dieback scaffold branches Infested one to a few conks;small cavities 2 average 60-90% small twigs small branches Minor present only at pruning wounds 3 good to excellent 90-100% little or none none None absent to present only at pruning wounds 'Pres is the numerical suitability for preservation rating(0-3)as defined in the Tigard Urban Foresty Manual: RATING CONSIDERATIONS The tree is a"hazard tree"as defined in chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code and"hazard tree abatement"as defined in Chapter 18.120 in the Tigard Development Code cannot be completed in a 0 manner that results in tree retention consistent with tree care industry standards. 1 The tree is dead,in severe decline,or declining but may still be retained if desirable for wildlife or other benefits because it is not considered a"hazard tree"or"hazard tree abatement"could be performed. The tree has average health and/or structural stability that could be alleviated with treatment;the tree will be less resilient to development impacts and will require more frequent management and 2 monitoring after development than a tree rated as a"3". The tree has good to excellent health and structural stability;the tree will be more resilient to development impacts,and will require less frequent management and monitoring after development than a 3 tree rated as a"2". Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 MHA1318 Senn Park-Tree Inventory Data 9-20-13 Morgan F�olenlit Attachment B:Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary 4;- AJJOCIATL( Page 1 of 1 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 1.25 x Mature Mature Canopy 1.25x Mature of Preserved Trees of Preserved Stands Canopy Area Area(sq.ft.)of Canopy Area Tree Canopy Effective% Lot Area (w/condition and (w/condition and (sq.ft.)of Native Non-Native (sq.ft.)of Area(sq.ft.) Canopy(Canopy Lot No. (sq.ft.) preservation rating>2) preservation rating>2) Planted Trees Planted Trees Planted Stands per Lot Area/Lot Area) 28 4858 0 0 5,989 ‘----- 1,256 0 7,245 149% 29 6224 12,234 ✓ 1 0 2,995 ✓ 0 0 15,229 245% Overall Development Site 11,082 12,234 0 8,984 1,256 � 0 22,474 203% Notes:Effective tree canopy cover is required to be calculated on a lot/tract by lot/tract basis only in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for each lot or tract in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts shall be at least 15 percent. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for the overall development site shall be at least: i.40%for R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7districts,except for schools(18.130.050(1)); ii.33%for R-12,R-25,R-40,C-N,C-C,C-G,C-P,MUE,MUE-1,MUE-2,MUC,MUR and I-P districts,except for schools(18.130.050(1));and iii.25%for MU-CBD,MUC-1,I-L and I-H districts,and for schools(18.130.050(1))in all districts. Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 • morgan.holen@comeet 1971.409.9354 Attachment D: Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan • • • III 1111 1.7 Il' pw'u �i I 1�, .Y SITE PLAN LEGEND M �" G W I t TREE PROTECTION NOTES: �Y>,; , I A w;I.1w'L9 Ralf W W IV MN.tlf91 Or K...ND AN 411.10,RM NMiR 00Ter a..Ai 1XF aN�6T 441.00 WO IF.WAIS! I- N w� LIMIT OF WORK I Lu R 00 oa0K 000 Was.N1.Ew Eu EAR 11101 iM¢ry)rwn;a m man ww.rax x K ort sxE I 1 I B �O1N:IX+�NI R MOLE WY 111 ap wade.X9oWeEf•TNI^.IFIPG ua>wxG AIR f61I 177 ---- PROPERTY UNE I K I I. 10�YW'WOKS 91.11 P103.M.Dr901 Mn 10400 011 OR0 MOH NE 004191E MBI 4f!Ih REE 045961®® W.R NWK M W WI6 W,rads: - - -. MANDE..,004c malls.Sawa 0111[NW.AM a ftsin RMIW.COMMIE.NOUr.rR 151114I.., EASEMENT UNE I 0) OWNER IS 0101'0.0 Rrmw:croW g IE.*Au.wuTF ARI P.amlwWm Ta Pt3F4mal. "' \\1,1, II/1' EXISTING TRANSFORMER City of Tgord 11� \ \�\ I ��// E WIFGI4[4•EOP.WOR M M a>F•o OEIUFf1ME x as oJaBwla R■R■ Publlc Woks Deportment I I \ I \ . /777 SW Burnham Sheet I j1 \ 900 PFCr A4 WMYM 01:100 vSHE100 Pf16A9N MSC 901 0 e0 GWd1 114flGF�IG TF WOWED F9 019 CO.C!41 WO=FRS F 1 k I .` % 05105:E RIM WNW/WES 3011 M u.sMICIEE.'X 51010 Pa MEM clam to 9M Pon 1Mt etre.I 4:1;GWl WI IC RAD NFl1EN NM EXISTING UCHT FIXTURE 116sd.OR 97223 I 1' 73 3 \ IRR at WWI e. a em m I _ tq sc.w A.awsa W OWN Wt....I.nE 1011 Xs*OF A Te<w ON.m X EXISTING TREE TO I k *.I = 01302 = PipFE�`POW+IMUE:E:'Fi C NfYn'tWflcf BE REMOVED __r I I - OWL'W19F 000411!ON 1*CFK x Wilk w 100 MOW,IYAIC1t+CMIES*TM 114 i0 K0E:IN0 CN[ D AY I d I •f 4RE* 0610 Ams oWUF n r a I WI,rl IxT nom'T*011 Al K me T n4 WE.+e4rna mis,la-sswr svW nE Noma.s p p CHNN UNN TREE CONSULTANTS II K //r.`/ \�\ 1.11 Pu 0 oRSM® PROTECTION FENCE(E) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE `` ` I 1�' ' {/`l I f l . \\\ N A®0I M�` ' ...PC VFORKO a al...PHS N aM.M 1000 0*00 Ma OCIWFN a•011710•11000 W"eE AWOK N M. UTILITY POLE Moore 100011 0 Golhmon.Inc 0n tF.m txnasavT 6•elwtlM 4049 t NM.Ma tFMINO 0 CATCH BASIN 815SW 2nd Suite 200 �•\ K I t SOU VW.RR R[001m1OM RKwt x AAI-.ARO.MET WERE.WDx 1Ei16r R31Blllf.,BEN Ri1ARil, 0 WATER VALVE Portland.OR 97201 I- , ® WATER METER CSURVEYOR 00(00 10 ROOM UMW.DM 04 4E 7R 00 0010 x J....al A ME 004*0 a K BNOFPG 51100 Z.444ErtMiG•16 U'X WICIInOF 0n I I I M, 4,1/4 WM A31k:5E brR MIFANS MN C➢W991 Mkt RaEw0E5 W RE TJ rE FR.2•MU MO 99¢1 WPV RUMBA ASM FM BUMS ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE kwy,SURA 150 FSN ` ' 'BEEF wet or S 1100010 w 0a0m 0116 nr l�MURm SAIF•I1a:T K+6 T walla 0106).00 1H 0012001001St 010 41140.000E 0 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 13190 SW 68th P Q I S M FO BR IMF 10106 ARM Y M RE)MOF.at Mh WR SAS 110�TO YE 110•04118,111,841.54,9 141111,1"ISWan w VM)C00:FME,R R 1I9ad OR 97223 I K I, '(�� mot ME 9 UNE CONT.TO UNKNOWN LOCATION I �]1� a rel R 0E 101E M"a1W WEB In E iERMD m 160.E K 00[4.50400_ ARBORIST �:��! a0 Nnm4 sa A 00Mm Mas Mos da FWT 4 GRAD saKo a w[E EM.WE MAME..Z.00,110 Feoenitr.radon 01 -E- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNE Mayon HRMn a 1000,01 s I gill �.i'"•I s_ roma V.A..1w TIE Mtn -ST- UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN UNE 3 Maros Pkwy,Sole P 220 moo` �� lake Oswego,OR 97035 I 11 N MVm6e y4.¢yYu.or d agytF7 MM0 qE ME gyHcip[Oa q sW 1qE r H VOW..N6,1'mE Tpgpne.r IK 01cT waNHI R -55- UNDERGROUND SANRARY SEWER UNE 1 9 G ••- mala.MUM W.101.6000 oMROro•01.05 N1>JI rE 6 calor Mtn 14 B..K ma'S:mMI kW m oma =ow.RA hUa -T- UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE 1 . Ms.P�ME lPte.4E SAME� - Kw N -V7- UNDERGROUND WATER UNE I I \\ , A TRE]HV61 REM NOGKA,41MIY 01•[16 l.W w:19:OFL tVfJ£a M TAH MEM*_']IE•s MID W Y[naSOMG.RF i4E' WOW w MUEE -TV- UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNE I Kra VIWIBaNa3. l= TONEMM ,ME WowM�nlaaW,11.T1....a�6 ROM MF:Ws� SENN PARK �_(�, t� G- UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS UNE a=ate i ME../MUM IN.st0e FRF OF 011 n.®10 ate Ow.14 MEE EW.50•aos ----PROPERTY UNE TRAI LH EAD ° i -1 ReuEVENN ME wroEn.Naas.TED.masa TEE 1101 W.A.'a.WE ax-sar em WIE.masa s.r..5 EASEMENT UNE K k ' - \ W 7417 A0enge I � ",•-'",-, Ogad.OR 97223 I j K 4G, # ;� / ems•of wase 4 r { lr EuslYSr ware I. -_.GUTTER 1 �. 8;1_ :>1328 `\\\\1,l i!t 1'(/ AV OWL d�N7ifiir�.M'-�` Pec.1l I¢mNNeE PAN I. , / I K E CURB I 'I "- I,, \\.` `-•-.,.....-..„...,,,„„„ `9-79_��\ 1G /f// \\�; \\�\ ,\\\`�sy li��//,/,/,„:„.,‘,..„.„..,,,,:...:.::._, /�� § �I. �i3riz ' REVISKxu DATE �... K LINE 1 e SIDEWALK 2 �V�\241"'/i----, al-��L A 7 X 621 li I .-� II . V'A cRr .1 -/ -.. 1\,1\,...„.'''\ j I''''''''..1\,.:7'..- T +6W®01(01 k i ///j\.\ - \ ./I \m. 0eii ♦ WKS Iowa. 7II ,, I,,,,,_,„ -� %/f I I I I ,T _ O ,,: . \\� ►r/" ice \\ \� 1010.1 peb.4 04 E 6.0411.W Ma M sd wow RE?) FST 8 \�!�\ti �� ('T[ �� nR a cue• .1.,.....• M STAMP F 4,858 SF .. " �' 0132 �� I/5 .Lb SW RE� I C 49 e y - EP" 01111 :r.. 00W..M*art... CEDA 'WAY E I rAxLOT:151 DBspD p _ � '� �c J '!/,g}-/13 • axE 2WASw ...0aropMees. : t i-4 1ST ��,,�� \ /� .. ,---,•.'''-'-'37,,,',;:/11.11-___\1\‘ \\Y/�� '�('\�...7/'4:...,,,,,., w` v'r1/ \ 1 MG,IEL I�kPTNFtsv E�vFE f-GIR•G ��• lil''�"" // V, �'�\ ° '�� CI\\Ilf �' MIG TREE PROTECTION NOTES DATE I 1 / LOT 2 \`"I.1 I\`1-I I I`,,, _ �' , 1.THIS PIAN IS BASED ON A SURVEY BY �q,� 1 i� 16149 ;� , Y E \ }1 I I 1i'. ¢t$$4`9�'" / rIj 1(1�., ,-,z,-,46,9‘ �� CESNW.INC.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL SEPTEMBER 210.4013 II I a d CbT{1412. .'•• i SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING 5101060101 .�-w ^�. I �'��/y, �4F•�\\ �/ L/TILff1E5 PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. w4\ � I--- �. /�i I\.,,,,,,,, � \ 1\diff �= PRIOR TO INSTALLATION,NOTIFY LAND USE REVIEW II \,,,. I 1 \\�\T, J\ \\ •\\\ 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY I , \ \\\ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION N. - _ �\\ {// \ �' 111 f I'\\ � _ SURVEY-RELATED DISCREPANCIES n \ ,/, �� \ �� IDENTIFIED ON SITE.ISC \ \ \ O . I____Big DRAWN BY: RE 11 IA 4 1 �\ e .�,� /j "L ''''/ - ��/7/G 13\\� 111 MIG No..BY: oeezoo 0 - ' I . :>/ ,arm'r/` !//f 1 t I, V�L�v Vvvv111 I�I{,aA CONSULT.140.: 1u ._ 1ji. Y SCALE: _ "'111___ It 134 < L / --- �/ � _.I -.. J/O ire -r�*' r +s� '0,2110, � r/'I�I§��\\2/�- �--WWI OF WORK " y y1 ._ SHEET TITLE_ ' �'n, \\C�� TREE PRESERVATION ¢ "� `.. //!III IIT\ I.MORGAN NOLEN,ATTEST THAT THIS t / RAY 1 t r TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL SITE /( �� ,A ac! 5 easc,E„,, PLAN MEETS ALL of THE REQUIREMENTS &REMOVAL SITE PLAN / \ ��JT 2A IN S 1 ,,// \\` =VFF N 10,PART 1,OF THE CITY -i( , \\. �\ J OF PGARD URBAN FORESTRY 16011011 SHEET NO. MARCEGA N FOLEN - -- �/'� -..... ISA SEED ARBORISTPN-81151 - DATE::SEPTEMBER 20,0.2013 Attachment E: Tree Canopy Site Plan ® • • • • 0 I i SITE PLAN LEGEND SITE PLAN PLANTING SCHEDULE A A M11 G aj,0 I PICNIC TABLE NW\/ - - - UNITOF WORK D CROUNCOVER 51160L BOTANICAL NAME/COMMON NAME SIZE/SPACING DIY !IA N • TRASH RECEPTACLE �ffSUNMARK'w0'WOODLANDS'SEED MIX 34%ROSA NUTKNOOTKA ROSE I 22%CORNUS STOLONIFERA/RED OSIER r. •.O • I . _ .SPLIT RAIL FENCE W/ 20%SYMPHOCJIRPUS ALBA/SNOWBE." FWUONUS EXCELSIOR/ 3•CAL/AS SHOWN 4 1 I 1 WELDED WIRE MESH 14%MUNCHER N.NIFOW/SERVIC'BERRY GOLDEN DESERT ASH OWNER I ■ 3'CHAIN LANK FENCE IX PHVSp'ARPUS GPTATI3 8%SA/MUCUS COERUIEA/BLUE E.ERBERRY Cry of Tpne /P• C NINE BARK Pubic world Deportment T I ®® STONE LANDSCAPE 1%HOUDISCUS DISCOLOR/OCEAN.PRAY 9777SW t.ento.n Street I II t s ® BOULDERS AM ACER 4ACROPIIYLLUM/ 3•CAL/AS SHOWN I %Koro.OR 911'13 • I I II 8008 TREE STUMP sroots PLANTING PLAN NOTES BIG LEAF MAPLE I V 1 CUSTOM WOOD BENCH _ I t ' I.THIS PLAN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PRONDE, BY 1 SOIL PATH CESNIY,INC. CONSULTANTS • AY I I • �� CORNUS NUTTALLII 1 1/2•CAL./AS SHOWN 8 LANDSCAPE ARCHIIECNRE 1 ) ® EXISTING TRANSFORMER 2.MIGE NOT LIABLE FOR THE EXACT LOCATION . , / 1 I ANT EXISTING LITOTES.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD PACIFIC DOGWOOD Moaro!acofono Gollvrwn,Inc. I VERIFY THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF OITIT SW 2nd Ave,Sults 1 I V EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY SITE PREPARATION, 815Portland.OR 9120/ 1 t `Y OEMOLI110N,OR CONSTRUCTION. \`\ I MI OPEN SOIL VOLUME AREA SURVEYOR \ I 6-10' 2 CERVINE YIc. \}I I L.1 n PROPERTY UNE 3.ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S ICER CIRCINATUM/ REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULTI-STEMMED/ 151903W MIM PAY.StrRa 150 VNE MAPLE EASEMENT LINE AS SHOWN Tl9dre.OR 97225 j I `O+ UTILITY POLE 4.ALLTREE LOGTOHS TO BE VERIFIED IN FiELO BY t ❑ CATCH BASIN OWNER'S REPRESENTATNE PRIOR TO PLANTING. ARNOROT IFWATER VALVE / MIX9pn Hobll&AModole! � t r' \I /A WATER METER 5.ALL PLANT SPECIES HAVE BEEN SELECTED FROM / IE) EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN VARIES 5 3Loke Oswego, Nome oORI97035 1 I NATNE SPECIES PNEIILS AND CONSIDER SOIL �I AR',46. ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TYPES.HYDROLOGIC CONDTIONS,AND SHADE THAT RECENES CANOPY CREDIT 01 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE REQUIREMENTS.THE 2013 TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY \ 4 f •�� —2 LINE COM.TO UNKNOWN LOCATION MANUAL WAS USED TO SELECT TREE SPECIES. 1 E— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE 6.PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN. `" ///SHRUBS&GRASSES SEN N PARK I I � ST— UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN LINE .4-1-4-1.---. 2 1` t— UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE 7.TREES TO BE REMOVES ARE NOTED IN THE TREE © TRAI LH EAD G PRESERVATION ANO REMOVAL PIAN.REUNNINC TREES SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA/ 5 GAL/AS SHOWN 2 I T— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE + I I I £l — SHALL BE PROTECTED PER THE TREE PROTECTIONSPEO RED ELDERBERRY SW 7AID Avenue / I • UNDERGROUND WATER LINE STING DRIPSHALLCAERULEA/TV AT LINE. GAL/ AS ‘...,....,K 7-G— UNDERGROUND NATURAL CAS UNE BLUE ELDERBERRY - I. j 8.HIND CLEAR AND GRUB WITHIN DRIPUNE UNDER TREES I III IIS/ `` TO ROAN. O OBUTHERN SHALLON/ 5 CAL./AS SHOWN 52 I A ..`` 9.PRUNING OF LOWER TREE BRANCHES TO BE M ,--:, #03 . DETERMINED ON SITE AT TIME OF PLANPNG BY ( NEPETA X FAASSENII'SIX HILLS MANY/ S GAL/AS SHOWN 22 I I I! I • IttlOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CATMINT 1 C 1 /111:1' rl ` ` O VACCINIUM X'SUNSHINE 5'GAL/3'OC 40 I!1096 I BLUE/SUNSHINE BLUE -227.x' I 1l / `` BLUEBERRY REVWON$ DATE I I ,5< I,MORGAN POLITE ATTEST THAT THIS O } 1/ /04 TREE CANOPY SITE PUN MEETS ALL PENNISETUM 1 GAL./2'OC 35 .I OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION ALOPECUROIDES 1 10.PART 2.OF THE CITY OF TTGARD I I ERI ,I I I- © �: •.� 'HAMELN'/FWMNN GRASS 1 FORESTRY MANUA t '�� Sty41I1V�� Ar Y.1.4.'-''' WOODLAND SHRUBS • I I 1� I. / " "Q' 302 GWLTHERN I DAL./2'OC 220 TAX LOT IS1250009500 4' A $HNlON/SALAL LSTANK I TE S -D 9tB PB 207 2013 61451 SW R I I 4,8585E /•`� 2015 SWORD FERN MUNRUM/ 1 GAL./3'OC 65 _ : ��1®!344{Ei `r �� SWORD FERN CEDA WAY I ''OOr,�IO.O�iLOO y' s: RISES FLOWERING 2 GAL/4'OC 30 • 47, Jv1 • �© , REO FLOWEPoNG CURRANT • I— I \ I I, a�O-O-O-OIO-O�O. '\'I/) 1 + 15% MOMPAC AQUIFOLIUM 2 GL/3'OC 50 .—t!' 1� /7,. 'COMPACTA'/COMPACT !Alit. OOO �.. OB .-:."4.,A OREGON GRAPE 4 I I II.2a�Cx�.001ILL Or • • I �OB 1 10t OEMELERN CERASIFORMIS/ 2 GAL/4'OC 20 DAIS O r �� INDIAN PLUM SEPTEMBER?tf.1015 00' `O )(13 IT1 �,_ V �OOOO SF4\ IOt SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS/ 2 GAL/3'OC 30 -�i�-e •�_ 0.,::••.� `tO /' 7 INOWEIERU SUtMRiM I00) •' N wooDIANO uNOERsroRY PLANnNc LAND USE REVIEW i \ 'i31 O ' NOT O CONSTRUCTION \ I 9�7 O O 0 'e''�� ` ` O II/;d 20t FRACARN CNJFORNICA/ 4•POT/PLANE IN }75 !>21 \ ♦O TAXLQT:-151 WOOD STRAWBERRY DRAWN 5Y: RE I OO1 �� y r 1 1 20% OXALIS OREGANA/ 4•POT/PLANT IN 375 4. OUI e/• 1 TOC •��/ \ tO I REDWOOD SORREL CHECKED BY: n1 '1134 . 10% 1 / OC 105 CONSUL. 01887.00 - Z21( �! ADIANTUM PFR UM/ GAL 2' . I ��,�OtJ 41aS�1 AAAA.. .,O 10% MBLECHAM AIDENHAIR CANT/ 1 GAL/2'OC 105 CONSULT.NO.: XX • I l .mQ DEER FERN SCALE: ED♦ r' iWtl - �.yy rr c.l 1 GAL PLANT IN 105 .___.-- 1 i ©Ca°, 0O00`i OOO •iAC9 •00.4 -- ' •210�EI A 10% VANILLLHEM M RACEMOSUM/ 1 / OC 105 �� OO120t. _..__. A.'I.A A _ t•A {... ... .. ...•sth•J. .. .. � .. � GAL/2' � UNIT OF WORT( I FALSE SOLOMON'S SEK SHEET MIF 11; a PLANTING PLAN NOTE can't); -� 5% ASARUM CAUDATUM/ 1 GAL./PUNT IN 75 TREE CANOPY S. NAY I , d • 10.LAYOUT OF FUMING MIXES T..: 13.OBSERVE BLIPS FOR=ION CONTROL PER CWS WESTERN WILD GINGER 1 / ROW WIDTH:10'-0 FIELD BYO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE' • . AND CITY OF TIGARD bEVELOPMENT STANDNNS.USE 5t CIMIFUGA RACEMOSA/ 1 GAL./2'OC 50 PLANTING PLAN SIDEY/MK WIDTH:5'-0• PLANTING. INLET PROTECTION/*FILTER BAGS AT CATCH BUCK COHOSH ' / I OPEN SOIL VOLUME IN NORTH PLANTER STRIP: RESINS,PLASTIC EATING FOR STOCKPILED SOIL, 5% TRILLIUM OVATUM/ 1 GAL/PLANT IN 75 SHEET NO. ---'- /I 230 5F•3-690 CF(TREE/01) 11.PLANT COUNTS FOR SMRUBS ARE SUPPLIED SEDIMENT C.SEE G1.D. WESTERN WHITE TRILLIUM j 1 THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE CONTRACTOR _ 5% VACCINIUM PARVIFODUM/ 1 GAL./3'OC 25 /; OPEN SOIL VOLUME IN SOUTH PLANTER STRIP: RESPONSIBLE AND QQUANTITIESNSHOWN..ALL PLANTS IN 14 AREAS DURING IRRIGATION EN WILL BE BEE USED PERIOD.FLAMING RED HUCKLEBERRY 1 370 SF•3-1110 CF(TREES ftI-f 13,OVERLAP ALLOWED) 12.SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION 15.SPLIT RAIL FENCE AND TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO PLANTING PLAN. UNDER ARBORIST SUPERVISION. • Appendix E. Deed Et Encumbrances • • Appendix E E-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 ngton County,Oregon 2007-081393 ./2007 03:25:24 PM 411" D-OW Crit=1 Btna22 I REED $15.00$5.00$11.00-Total=$31.00 t e: k THIS SPACE RESERV 111111 III 11111 I 1 iii ii III iiui11 III ` 'r ..'4!'.1/4. `01145053200700813930030036 -, 4. 'f• L Richard Hobe mlch[.Director or of ment.rtd and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington ' . .p. County,Oregon,do hereby certify that the within -.., ..,-4,0%•,•,:, •, 404...• Instrument of writing was received and recorded Ir her'-i` s.: . ' LL book of records of sold coupty n 1 Richard Nobamicht.Director of A meat and j t+O'. Taxation,Ex-Officio County Clark After recording return to: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 k*.'.'", Until a change is requested all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: City of Tigard J 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 File No.: 7034-1073204 (nt) Date: July 23, 2007 O STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED _ Ash Creek Properties LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Grantor, conveys and warrants to City of Tigard , Grantee, the following described real property free of liens and encumbrances, Z except as specifically set forth herein: 0 C) See Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein. Q. Subject to: 1. The Taxes, a lien not yet payable. 2. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements, if any, affecting title, which may appear in the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey. The true consideration for this conveyance is $345,000.00. (Here comply with requirements of ORS 93.030) Page 1 of 3 0 • • APN: R0231920 Statutory Warranty Deed File No.: 7034-1073204(nt) -continued Date:07/23/2007 BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INS I FRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. Dated this day of , 20 'T Ash Creek Properties LLC By: M. Dale Richards, Managing Member • STATE OF Oregon )ss. County of Washington This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20 by M. Dale Richards as Managing Member of Ash Creek Properties LLC on behalf of the . OFFICIAL SEAL • COW T.TIMM ,,,, , , �L N ; I,Zuur+tj Notary Public for Oregon X 6 MYCON,?:_f..:- ._-- My commission expires: Nh- COMM . gOAJ (JO. 1,A f pt2.r-5 Page 2 of 3 • • Preliminary Report Order No.:7034-1073204 Page 6 of 6 Exhibit "A" Real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows: Lots 28 and 29, ASH CREEK ESTATES, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon; Tax Parcel Number: R0231920 • First American Title • Washl County,Oregon 2008-028468 03/31,, 03:01:20 PM D-R16AM Cnt4,1 Ytn■16 DHOFFMAN $45.00$5.00$11.00-Total■$61.00 11111111 11111IJUJILI1[]liioiiJjl111II III AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: I,Richard Hob.micht,Director of Assess merit and :•,.nut Ti Jordan Schrader Ramis PC Tassdon and Ealfof o County Clerk for W,.Mngton County,Oregon,do h.raby urtlfy that th•within PO Box 230669 Instrument or writing WWI received and re orchid In the.y book of records of said cou Portland OR 97281 Richard Hobemicht,Director of Asssamord and 4*<z.:c4JF'' (50014-36792 —JLD) Taxation,Ex-Officio County Clerk This space is reserved for recorder's use. FIRST AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS APPLICABLE TO ASH CREEK ESTATES This FIRST AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS APPLICABLE TO ASH CREEK ESTATES (the"First Amendment"), • dated this I day of Mo4let-td , 2008 (the "Effective Date");is entered into by and between ASH CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company ("Declarant") and the undersigned owners(collectively,the"Owners") of Lots in Ash Creek Estates. The legal description for Ash Creek Estates is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Z RECITALS ICJ A. Declarant executed and recorded on June 28, 2007 as Document No. 2007- 'Q 072138 in the records of Washington County, Oregon, that certain Declaration of 4■ Restrictions, Conditions and Covenants Applicable to Ash Creek Estates (the "Declaration"). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Declaration. B. Declarant and the Owners have agreed to release Lots 28 and 29 from the Declaration,and to convey Tract A to the City of Tigard, Oregon. C. As of the Effective Date, Declarant and the Owners own 29 Lots in Ash Creek Estates,and Declarant owns Tract A. D. Declarant and the Owners wish to amend the Declaration as set forth in this First Amendment. Page 1 —FIRST AMENDMENT 50014-36792 Ash Creek CCR Amenddce.G/3'11'1008 11111 • AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Declarant and the Owners hereby agree to amend the Declaration as set forth below: 1. Lots 28 and 29. Lots 28 and 29 are hereby fully released from the Declaration. There are no unpaid assessments against Lots 28 and 29 as of the Effective Date, and no assessments shall hereafter be levied against such Lots. All references to Lots 28 and 29 in the Declaration are hereby deleted. All calculations for assessments made pursuant to the Declaration shall be made as if Lots 28 and 29 were never included in the Declaration. 2. Tract A. The Owners and Declarant hereby acknowledge and consent to the conveyance of Tract A by Declarant to the City of Tigard, Oregon. While consent or approval of the Owners is not required for any such conveyance, the Owners in this case wished to document their approval. 3. Amendment. Owners and Declarant represent that, as of the Effective Date, they collectively hold at least seventy-five percent (75%)of the total votes in Ash Creek Estates. • 4. Full Force and Effect. The Declaration, as modified by this First Amendment, is hereby ratified and affirmed and shall continue in full force and effect. [Signature page follows] Page 2—FIRST AMENDMENT 50014-36792 127863(2).dodkG'3.'11i2008 • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to be effective as of the Effective Date. DECLARANT: OWNERS: ASH CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC, an LOTS 1,4, 5, 9. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 22,23,26 Oregon limited liability company and 27 _ASH CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC By: Name: „- 1 By: Its: /),re /G.,:., I Name: , '7! :'J—/r .e./4‘ Its: ,174 9 /7Yra7 �j•� LOTS 3, 7, 8, 16, 17 and 25 WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION, INC. By' Name: /27 4Z, , ,e2ef • /j Its: ,};rS�G��., LOT 24 • VERDE ASH CREEK, LLC By: Name: ,-;'1 / f /2, ' Its: /)7 c-i71 J el"' • LOTS 28 and 29 CITY OF TIG: • 111110 Name: roaic-r Its: [Notary Blocks on following pages] Page 3 -FIRST AMENDMENT 50014-36792 127863(2).doc,G,3'11/2008 • III STATE OF OREGON ) / ) ss. County of i'I/ s1 l iit:) ) This instrumentJJwas acknowledged before me on 1Ni fJ1 I/ , 2008, by ff�� Magic Left i'lC.f- M del i2te%4r t1S , as Mur)l /4 of Ash Creek Properties, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company. 5/ / i' (`yeP5sc -- (.w./,,rl, NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON MyCommission Expires: /L`-.G -.,2C / -21. OREERA GASTON p `, :-4).NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.421286 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT 10,2011 STATE OF OREGON ) County of j if/.15/1//2e // )) ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on /ha/C/) // , 2008, by 1)) .Ja.. rCt111nc/5 ,as Ife.�1GLt,ri' of Windwood Construction, Inc., an Oregon IIIcompany. =!' OFFICIAL SEAL `//>fit/>/C. _ t L- .j jZ,L __•. ;,-"'•-: - EERIt OFIA NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON GASTON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: I C-/C -...11-1 1 �'' COMMISSION NO.421266 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT.10,2011 STATE OF OREGON ) 1 /- ) ss. County of i eL.sit)ii/ft 7Li ) ) / This instrument was acknowledged before me on /' Li1 i1 I ,,„ z z „, ,--- , 7 Z z , , 2008, by A,,3'Aras , as /vie' /Pi &i,. of Verde Ash Creek, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company. / ' 7A4 ./> h >/isi1•('-/ �:_. OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON a '- GREERA GASTON My Commission Expires: /C ,C .2 e i/ /NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON . ` `; COMMISSION NO.421286 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT.10,2011 Page 4—FIRST AMENDMENT 50014-36792 127863(2)doc%G'3.11,2008 1111 • STATE OF OREGON ) County of Ktof"iN611304 ) ss . This instrument was acknowledged before me on jt1AKC14 12- , 2008, by CAN& T('.L°G.X 1z- , as (!t1 �,iI4N & of the City of Tigard, an Oregon municipal corporation. , _ NOT RY PUBL FOR OREQON My Commission Expires .27 /J OFFICIAL SEAL J J BEF1GTSON 1J NOTARY PUr31 JC-OREGON O ( COMMIS5"t1\i NO.413772 MY COMMISSION D,Pli-LS APR.27.2011 9 •t��-` tiff �-.-`-``-�.. • Page 5—FIRST AMENDMENT 50014-36792 127863(2).dac.G,3%112008 • • EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Ash Creek Estates PLAT OF ASH CREEK ESTATES, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2007072138, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, AS CORRECTED BY AFFIDAVIT OF CORRECTION, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2007-094547, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. • Page 6—FIRST AMENDMENT 50014-36792 127863(2).docG'3'11Q008 • • ASH CREEK ESTATES OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LOTS 1 —29 LOT NUMBER OWNER DATE OF PURCHASE Seller 1 ASH CREEK PROPERTIES,LLC 2 GOODLETT MARSHALL 8/14/2007 BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 3 WINDWOOD 7/27/2007 CONSTRUCTION,INC. ASH CREEK 4 PROPERTIES,LLC Seller 5 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 6 GOODLETT MARSHALL 08/14/2007 BUILDING AND • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 7 WINDWOOD 10/25/2007 CONSTRUCTION,INC. 8 WINDWOOD 07/27/2007 CONSTRUCTION,INC. 9 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 10 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 11 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 12 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 13 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 14 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 50014-36792127087(2).60c1r/3/11/2008 • • 15 JAMES O. LEET AND 7/18/07 SALLY CRAIG 16 WINDOOD 7/27/07 CONSTRUCTION,INC. 17 WINDOOD 7/27/07 CONSTRUCTION,INC. 18 DARYL& JULIE 07/12/2007 RETZLAFF 19 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 20 GOODLETT MARSHALL 11/15/07 BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 21 GOODLETT MARSHALL 11/15/07 BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 22 ASH CREEK Seller 110 PROPERTIES,LLC 23 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 24 VERDE ASH CREEK,LLC 11/01/2007 25 WINDWOOD200 7/ 7/ 7 0 2 CONSTRUCTION,INC. 26 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 27 ASH CREEK Seller PROPERTIES,LLC 28 CITY OF TIGARD 07/24/2007 29 CITY OF TIGARD 07/24/2007 • 50010-36797 127087(2).doc1G 3%1112008 • Notes: 1. Windwood Construction and Verde Ash Creek, LLC are owned by Ash Creek Properties, LLC, developer Dale Richards. Lots 1, 3-5, 7-14, 16, 17, 19, 22- 27, are all owned by Mr. Richards. 2. Each lot owns 3.45%of the total ownership. 3. Dale Richards Declarant owns 21 lots including all in the names referenced in Note 1 above. City of Tigard owns Lots 28 and 29. Declarant/owner and City of Tigard own 23 lots together, totaling 79.3%, enough to amend CCRs per the ORS. • 50014-36792 127087(7).docl(3/3/11/2008 • • Appendix F. Storm Water Calculations III • Appendix F F-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 CES NW • Memorandum TO: City of Tigard DATE: 09/05/13 FROM: John Jensen, PE PROJECT#: 2903 SUBJECT: Senn Park Preliminary Storm Report Enclosed please find the narrative addressing CWS' water quality and quantity standards for surface water management. EXISTING CONDITIONS The Senn Park project is located east of the intersection of SW 74`h Avenue and SW Red Cedar Way and includes tax lots 1S1W25DC 9500 and 9600. The two tax lots are part of the Ash Creek Estates Project constructed around 2006-2007. The site slopes to the northeast with elevations ranging from 235 to 212 feet. Storm water runoff from these tax lots currently flows to an open space tract containing Ash Creek. According to the Soil Conservation Service's soil survey of Washington County the site consists of • Helvetia Silt Loams at the upper portion of the lots and Wapato silty clay loans on the lower portions of the lots closer to Ash creek. Helvetia soils are classified as hydrologic group 'C' with slight erosion potential. Wapato soils are classified as hydrologic group CID with slight erosion potential. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed improvements consist of a new park with a wood chip play area, concrete walkway and benches. The two tax lots cover a total area of 0.25 acres. The new park will create 956SF of new impervious surfaces. WATER QUALITY/QUANTITY The water quality and quantity requirements for the two lots comprising the Senn Park project were addressed as part of the construction of the Ash Creek Estates Project. Storm water runoff from the project will drain to the existing detention pipe that was constructed as part of that project. The Senn Park project will create less new impervious surfaces than would have been created if two homes had been constructed on these lots. Attached is a copy of the Ash Creek Estates Storm Water Report detailing the water quality and quantity measures that were constructed for the two lots. P'• 1 01 / L. � i I7+A A�.� 'I /V r OVER • ERENEWAL DATE ./1±,—/,/,( 1 CESNW,Inc. • Storm Water Report Ash Creek Estates — 74th Avenue 42 v 6\-)'� Prepared For Dale Richards 12655 SW Dakota St, Tigard, Or. 97223 Ph (503) 625-6526 • 05/2005 Kurahashi and Associates 15580 SW Jay St. Suite 200 Beaverton, OR 97006 • • ASH CREEK ESTATES II—74th AVENUE STORM WATER REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CONTRIBUTING AREAS SITE HYDROLOGY EXISTING FLOWS PROPOSED FLOWS DETENTION SYSTEM WATER QUALITY TREATMENT • TABLE 1 Appendix A - Site Maps and Drainage Map Drainage Map Site Plan Utility Plan Grading Plan Landscape Plan Appendix B - Flow calculations Hydrograph Return Period Recap—Existing&Proposed Hydrograph Summary—Existing&Proposed Hydrograph Report—Existing&Proposed Appendix C - Stage Storage,Discharge Tables, and Detention Calculations Reservoir Report Appendix D -Water Quality Calculations Appendix E—Soils Data • Ash Creek Estates—74th Avenue • Stormwater Report 05/2005 Introduction Windwood Homes, LLC intends to construct a 29 lot residential subdivision called Ash Creek Estates at 9750 S.W. 74th Avenue, south of Barbara Lane, in Tigard. Historically this 6.42-acre parcel was residential timber zoning. Ash Creek, a tributary of Fanno Creek, crosses the site. The proposed subdivision involves adding streets, sidewalks, utilities,homes,and landscaping which increase the amount of impervious surface on the parcel. The project also includes an extension of 74th Avenue that requires a culvert crossing of Ash Creek. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of this culvert is not included in this stormwater report. Appendix A contains maps for the proposed facilities Table 1 summarizes the hydrology and hydraulic calculations for the site. the following information summarizes the design assumptions of the stormwater system. Contributing Areas The over all site contains 6.42 acres of which 5.26 acres are under development. Site Hydrology • Site hydrology was calculated for both the existing(Pre-developed)and post-developed conditions. Site flows were calculated using the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph(SBUH) methodology. The Washington County Soil Survey identifies the soils on the site as Woodburn with a classification C,and Ash Creek as having Wapato with a hydrologic classification C. Using this soil data the pervious areas were calculated with a CN of 81 and the impervious areas received a CN or 98. Table 1 summarizes the SBUH assumptions. Existing Flows Based upon a composite CN of 81 existing site runoff flows were calculated for the 2,5,10, and 25-year stormwater events. Appendix B contains the data and SBUH printouts for the pre- developed conditions. Table 1 summarizes the site flows. (Note: Hydroflow by Intellisolve was the software used to determine flows and make detention calculations.) Proposed Flows Based on a composite CN of 95 existing site runoff flows were calculated for the 2,5,10, and 25- year stormwater events. Appendix B contains the SBUH printouts for the post-developed conditions. (Note: Hydroflow by Intellisolve was the software used to determine flows and make detention calculations.) Detention System Since Clean Water Services ordinances require runoff control a 9' diameter x 192-foot long detention pipe was included on the site. This detention pipe uses a multiple orifice outlet(note • • preliminary pond sizing uses single orifice)to limit off-site flows. Appendix C contains the stage storage and stage discharge table for the detention system. Water Quality Treatment In order to meet the Clean Water Services water quality standards volume was added to the detention pond for water quality purposes. Based upon the standard 0.36-inch water quality storm, water quality treatment requires a 6-cartridge filter. Conveyance Actual site conveyance will be designed in accordance with City of Tigard and Clean Water Services standards. The conveyance system consists of mainline pipes,manholes, catch basins, house laterals and other normal storm drainage appurtenances. Appendix A shows drawings of the storm drainage system. Public System Impacts The stormwater from this site will discharge directly into Ash Creek. Since the detention pie maintains the runoff from the site at pre-development conditions,the development will not create any downstream impacts. • • Table 1 Ash Creek Estates Summary of Storm Drainage Criteria 05/2005 Pre Development Data Post Development Data Soil Type Woodburn Group C Woodburn Group C Total Area (ac) 6.42 6.42 Developed Area 5.26 5.26 Impervious Area (ac) 0.10 4.26 Pervious area (ac) 5.16 1.01 CN-pervious 81.00 81.00 CN-Impervious 98.00 98.00 CN-Composite 81.00 95.00 Tc (min) 12.00 5.00 Water Quality Volume (ft3) na 5567.00 Water Quality Flow (cfs) na 0.39 Pre Development Post Development Detention Flows (cfs) Flows (cfs) Release (cfs) Rainfall (inches) 2 year 0.83 2.66 nc 2.5 5 year 1.35 3.45 nc 3.1 10 Year 1.68 3.91 nc 3.45 25 Year 2.11 4.5 1.81 3.9 50 year na na na 4.2 100 year na 5.28 na 4.5 • • 0 • Appendix A — Site Plans and Drainage Map Drainage Map Site Plan Utility Plan Grading Plan Landscape Plan S pp 1:1.4'1.--/ ........."P : 7. I". - .mailti...., D. 1951198 04 iII I i • 1, \ \I r1?oa> $ GRAPHIC SCALE _ I 'f.', . �riI v�xn errs t �Icr PA .,w 4.0144 swop. 4,PIANTI.MP 1THE 1 2,116.11, 57 la____} 1 w>K lar�6MSS ESS W �nlmaan r Igor i j Ili, WIRY 1 38 37 35 Js 34 33 •' =a.... 6s• I • Z •�- • -�lm'1--, 1 36.1 �. 111 560Y 58.00' 3600' 56.00' Sloe' 5600' 63Jr 481E �° LLI 36•t 1"------------- +r ---� •.„ yr ��r ftue wmlir p l,r TI---� L''1 T- 11:�--5- i lA} LNE I'I III I �••'A• 'il �('r 1.1 I' I�1 I;, /. 56 1�5 Q w __�� r/ '6.67°S.F��I Iii +I.IISeIOI R+>• ' II III III III /� "� 0 r r I a I a I I 11 N!!!Lin S.P.•/ ii, .aaFwm�1•01 ,461'8 3,-38.- ,1 r. ra 'rarY•Ce•��uc .arrtoaiwrr �� C 1 Ill.fis225.F.g'II giI 4 I' S ^Ii 6 iI hilI , y �d�� I R�-- f� rn ` :12,-..-...:„...-- -1 r v 'r -1,g7.11 `� 1 I'1 6,071 S.F.1' 6,290 SF." 6'509 S.F.I, 11 7 q 15,714 S.F. i /./ I Ill 7 I I - I .,111 I' I'I 8.938 SF. // 1 I'I \\ { L--___J I I Li Qi 1RACt,c, ' I 9615.P I' $1'I o�Il i,l \ \\ 142Y __+SQ ll__;L_-__-�I --_I._---_-,I 111 IiYii 1 `.L`J,� 7.905 S.F.,.. N O LI aNv. , .I 4.385 S.F.1 11.5[9 S.F.^I'I 1'I , _'�72-- ¢are' --- 1, ii '_``ddww'' t5 i- 55 0 asr1. 55' r x III 113,3H SF'$I 1 • :�. \ -"12:- J$(j_ J'L-'----',T 1 ..\\ \0�% C'3 U O 6 + t'••4'1''''X31 4 z_61�in d1 i Ali, `.`s _____ _E$ ".'�'�.��.:......m...... .--.51" 4a.n_t;¢ ' `�w.�%' ' .__Ci ®s P. .V W - _,f7.BB'_J L s)bl_ -1;1 =ilL+ .10• ��3. .iF 1 \ Rr F-1 ,j ' 6 - --? �`7'q• III lTaa% — ---- _ _ `- 1�----_sr_5E-F.'T--..--------4 --_r i 5.+�6 s.F.I O 1 Qr, 0 E 17.413 S.F.1 ---- 117..' sell''- --- '�• j 1 a F Cz i 1VN 7 ' u l 2 'i,l I I =�;r a se=_ �.ir= r - \ ` 1 3 t as 's, ;ii•N• I 6,11 1 III 1'11-----li _ *yr, - 1 W :E„, I '1 -+; ��iI 4953 S.F.'�III 4.965 S.F.III nII' lir-__--1 -----,:r_--__ �,21.411:- 54 n n n _ at ri' T.: ��► 1 /ry�i'; 'p• I '1y,�Q,'' u y . I I I''5.122 SS's 1 In l�r(7S}L' \ 1 /'SIr --��1 M. N F' L.:(f.,,;:e., EI +w nl- -. III 51.20•__,i oIII 5.205 S.F.1'I 6. SII II '0494 ill 16 91 III \ ,: 1 < T2 p�p`�' Q = LOrX-u0oc Rr,_ 114, .,I ✓s ISI I,. SOOwtK 181'1 1 , -�, ��` 0,054 S.F.j IN (-)! AMON y �� 7r,1 '� ,�2.6��L Q• S). IlclI I!I ,' ..•tl0; ).♦�.+ ` `1 - 27A9�1364' .• •J.B� ' s JII6.659 S.F. 'IIIII `---\,{( \\`�' I �I ^ d6,6°1 S.F. l LIQ1.' S'D^, +�+1jlq % I� - 6.811 sF^iii "1;I 1'1 1�' o \��p4. ,� `�t \,_ I 6,662 ss.II 14 1' \ / 53 '/IU! ; 7y1 'I , { r \+--,.* ' .S,SF_, 1:,--------4 I hi I 11 1 - `� O i 1 pKE.I,` .1 + Irr•; TRACT A r.-•_._.-. Y:fF._.-.1'I Il1 1.1 .Z\\I I II1�� 1,rrrrTRACT EASEMENT) L_S60J�_-j��8•Z Ir1'- / .1 F a ?' \ i `~'� ♦�♦ ''''-'-'2.:::-....„ -�tO�I' iLW. 111:11 1 111r"� �i F> �` ♦ ♦ a ..,....,:ill 1\-♦ 1 .��, .� ♦ ♦ 4".., Ir 9,269 SF.1',1 / 1 CL {R �. r.Irin 1, -----,,,'44,5, '�• L._.J I.. CD IC .r,J ,� 6EtUYoSOrr v -'ll-•---'-11, 11.566 s-F. 1.6 �/�l,I O P r16p6�6 I r r.LLE wm.nvr ` 111111 \m III 1.3 I ay vill) ` N I doral �I I�• urinr MUCH p1w.r to\+.+ �.- ` +\`'urn \••- 1'I \'1 I • 52 3 1111 o rAsnurl I t Qs- ti. .a ;r,-,; ♦ 1111,.,,11„1„ \21srill 11!1 •F Q u) j •-.?O' 1 • I'I 6246' lls �' U T ii lrr\?>- °'y♦ �� "��i +�"�`��•n•"11,111, `--------��_=�—n'= N ,1 I Cr I 28 lil \" • .I I % 1 =_ IIr1�r T lj I I1.e0e SF.IIe �` \Ia $ tt�J .As-..k.1.,,' .... ...k. ..... \♦ it n� '6z,7j`•: • "1.•11111 01 i I �'�__JI 6.234 S.F. \\,16 gl} jr �it .,, .,,; : ; .+� �--- 51 N I 1 2 3 4 I 5 I 6 \ 789 ,4r ,yl•,I�" TRACT'E' 1' /T2 `'7�r KURAHASHI I 4 ASSOCIATES. INC. _E.-1i I' HEIGHTS I Q I jv>':® wWr mow,.r,. ..IlI .7;w wr nmlw-rm3 /i &TE0EVFIAQR7, PLAN v 'AS INGION SQUARE ESTATESyIa 20} D • • • • • • MAPCO 8 / a w s. 0'V. j Is .a:..—i 41' — .u"� BARBARA STREET 1 "� !ill ,0053 _'.Irr s 11 .i._ ..cI a g �` . n::: ' - $ 1i 1 _ GRAPHIC SCALE W _ u �J][R�/A18II� 1FffiCaHIT� /1 �p TTC 1e , � 10+00.00 Pp,a • I i HNEeII SS•NH (=r—tc I • 38 335 (N./.MANHOLSDIPE) z ms• sxNu SHADY LN. 0- .__, _.._. 3< 33 srora uNc-_y yiikiW 4i �.a� �. . ,��Ir--11 i'l fir--ir iY-1r---ri 1:I -- 1I----d/i i -'- 56 'OM l3 :1x1112-z-, C SIR epm I _. :_'�_,f r►,r 5"#'. I I III 19 pI'I I'I !' I I /'/ MJ sma Rme :i ,•,.• .....,.- - i moi.`��// I, i i i / x"12. v 6. Axr i�1x 10. re, �� r rhe u�N II 4 iii 3 11 ♦ 6 I 6 II it 6 iil y / 0 $6 N'� s, -r __, , 1..� . 1,1 III I III !I 7 m sAx.,.r uc j F77 r ,n \ a"41--_1 L_ i a-sn I PIS LAT. I I -+I_ ,, 1D 1 Q O n 1riNI�` ; . ,smer,.a r it 44 l'IM "�%L -`)'�PRIV 1k t* Id i1 (mew 1, --- ��( [g. E4 lD � 1 I OmcW III II \ �� _�ow��._.. '° , •,,ET--i' __J' �..',` \ 55 A 15 5�9 ca 4: 0-....►�� :�< e• sz 11 a e'�`;� �/�aseiAI � _/ 1 \;,.....„:Sr.'� 1 , • NE,. .ii: L _ � � ,�K � ` i�i•�._rtw_i■ �%I_�i/�,� _ I MJ R 'iA WORN UNE ,. ssrW t .................-7-----------.. ��• ` •`�,-�� 0 11 M 2 N $ ?S (n 2€V m I I CI- 4��x:S- �� s�i. Q ,f'i�;;��"�+ Ira.roax urt ., v II - 7 f Qo r-- ,,_ = '_ 6_._�� L NUJ 6 :12.,1 eoz w1.ur- 1 . ___ f-. 1 /', J 5. Y oho_ g' ill I'1 hi ti �' 1 i - ' .♦ MJ i? ra a f it , I, ,,.1.E , _— a,�� \ o it .,x ¢ j` ..' ,� \ LI I I lit I sea um 1, H I T7 Iii r �� /`��' a ❑ w :651� .7--?:".16"' s� .� I J� I < it IISI \ 2 1 Q [r 'i T E', ›*' - �-/I'"` \ III �1 ISI IL ll NII I, . 5l�r`- ‘12:7CI 0 a 2 Srou'u - 4- ,-`• (we a-�', , `J L—� \. :I 111.4911 , -. - _ II 111 v� I V�2 0 1. VAC(uA.crrw�16 1 ' � fA c I% •-'14.1,01 I \"4ik+ �% ft, _ J L. -14'-- -/F III /•'s,o�u¢ J 53 UIERAL )1� \ ai i. ~ !I� 1J soNx V7 'N /fid $'may! eM \e� 1 6%z I �� y�::�:, 1. --- - a SPAY WPM, ••••,011.9'67''''S .0er�' ., too:.) PEON yj Jo °x ` _ --0 4 51 Lol I ° rw. -a- ^' a �'1��,�& f�' ` - �s—vis—ons w I vacr 2 I ^I 3 J < I 5 1�6 '-"_-} 8"_..,a--N.s_,,,.stel.'` tr��ri _._I`' �� I RAHASHI I I I iG'' T; _TRACT"E' urs.. T I i( / 1'aei;�y �. �- tip_ TRACT'0' .ax�:�•.. IS /; HEIGHTS -._ :7-1.; .aN 4 1 I COAPOSITE PUN a. .. 3 0118 11 tA19 d' riEE iS 21s.dw 11 $ ■ \ \ /24/ 02: PM,e vin,Kurahash &Associates,Inc. 5. - ¢ 1\11 i I ! 4TH SIT AVENUE ifis 1q ill f Q 4 11 '\)), Q� / / q •C� �11 r �e0 ''''' •-Abbe ..,' ��i ms : _iikr - -a t\SIN d1 ,ra+r a^.!e ..iiA GReISt4I � 1 1 Illiqik:",:.0. 4.-14t.-'4---i + � � JSr, \� �,f� J � AttN044:tedlie... .1.4i11.,.114.4� \ `` 1 .. �a!!•� `NI[��N;.• t` , aI ,�,i' II 1 . prlifiliig,- lialvitir i , , ` , �� _ti it 4' `id L . ,, , �,��,►,13� �. N or' 4,'*; c' • ' x,44 4')/, „ iP; �$1.%, i • \ � •' i1 �\ -lag 0"---- P-r,..1"..---•;---'• I s „,, , ,, , , _., ,,,,. , ..4 ,I\... 1" 'N --,,._ \ 1111.. Q_,,-_-_,.,) i•i . ( 4,,,,, , .r, --.,-‘40,16,1 , ,...-::-......, , a6 R/r , ) Ila 1/�(��--!Y �,�\\( • r 11I ..41'Z' 111101•::'''''':" ...N�•� +' � \ � • / r ` 111 / �� / /qA. mai = i ii --' • • • 9_ OM. ILK01.11. mon Me Olt MIAS NIE Past RN* inw_umMO / SIMBOL BOGMGL/CONNOR NAME SIZE SPCINC A:En RUBM:Y'REO SUNSET-RFD SaNSFT MAPLE O POE STANDARD ACORN DECORATIVE FPTURES ON PRIVATE STREET O (DIRECT BURT)MTII PHOTO CELL M'PDST-TOP(39022)WHALEY DESC5_16-8L_3-N6/PGE(000036151) DR EQUAL 100 NATt LUspALRt(ALL CONPCNENTS ID BE PDE APPROVED CR APPROVED EQUAL) WNMAST ,yN irmAS \j PMsTSO1pSIi5n pNOUNTcARGOHT6EMECT BURY COBRA HEAD("INURE 2 )11215 GRAPHIC SCALE -e!,..04t. yL" t SEE,REE PRESERVAnpN PLAN FOR TREES TO BE PRESERVED UID REMDV£D) I . �8. L1 S SMUT TREES 91UL BE PLANTED NO O.DSER THAN 20 FEET TO...VG STANDARDS AND SMALL BE AACFD NO CLOSER ANANMO 2'FROM ANY PETNANFNT HUMD I I y S ECS PANNC OR wFMUMAT(PER OTT OF DE PLANTING AE CCOE ETITS. * I(p nye)N Lv�a cri.39M 3 3.SEE SNEERS!9 FPL STREET DETAILS FOR TREE PLANING REQUIREMENTS. •y*N AR }LEg�p qyl�, HEIGHTS/ T..T / 2a Q R 6 TIRE RAZE RTy PATCH F , — 77+30.89 Ad. . VA ul['➢JL' aV'D2.1D�"u'aLL�Y YAIL'E.ICll --p— i N 70+00.O0 PR95I l I, STREET TREES NT Oh-0P 0G.TYPICAL p � 57 1 TA)L°T:YD7 `J ii k7 I I I• SHADY LANE I i 11 • 38 37 36 35 34 33 Afl 0 z SPg� 56 I ��_��_727 A��1/ II__— Ir--�Ir 111 —�7(---'1r ,r--,r—__—��— lwul • __a�E� � II II Iq III III III II /'/ m W $ �1•�I—1 _� .L. — �% t �I� z III 3 III 4 III IIIsi II • I Io /�� Q U i ;I I r--7 `Ill it II II II II III �� j tDI Z 05a" q p I'I I, `....:11...;111P'4: L PRIV., E J L I'I I ✓ O 2S Da d d'11� �� „S� ST"EET �� 55 !� ►- 3 . ,,. ,CLE - II i N x lb I . •••••..,, oL ._- I a ill p ' '�!i' \ I ' r`=_� _^ € o 5I F °I I` ;� i 1 � I \ jil I'I j �I� is lil V lil is I, r�.i 11 10 `1_ Q ¢y a ) 111 I / � —- I I II III ' \`..,. I '° t} N et. m Fr J L 1,1 III I I III s 1 n i �'j� � � ,/e \ I III PI I,� ISI K 11 13 vv�v 53 ❑ N �� / d �, — II—.— to I'1 \ I ' / 1 % r-7°+\,�, �_, TAXLOT 300 `I L__ I'I Id \v n a� Lr. rs, o , ,;I� \` / \\,'f �0 �'\ III 1`I i_____ — o I� �.1� / a._ a. /�1d` _ "'L' III \1 I 52 \ \♦ / /\ -Z\` Iii Itl a a ') _I g l r� / A\ / / \ �� -,-",-----, �Ntr —��L_._� + i. �� III �1 `\ A /,// l 1` ��^♦+ --.;,. ..-..\--;---...N....., o sem— j I�4—JII ?D ,,,„..5.,... P. \ \/ / o+40- \\p , 1 A+ eAw I ,�� m _1 � E �.K I' , ATG.:_ O 1 ---- -,� -- N.:--Mrs —Mrs !■i■ --- - — —N96— ri, �. 4 , i` °--e s• ms--_nrs NT �'e.\ �� a,AssoCIAL.N.INC. KURAHASHI _ 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 s ,0Nv� TRACT.E. .'"._�=N.NI.....•- 155.0 ST lay St*Sutt•ROO /' NEIG S 2 Taj \` inrnsca ISIPLANTNG S g PLAN 'EETNQ 11 EHt 19 Appendix B - Flow Calculations , Hydrograph Return Period Recap — Existing & Proposed Hydrograph Summary — Existing & Proposed Hydrograph Report —Existing & Proposed • • Hydrograph Return Period Recap Page1 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow(cfs) Hydrograph No. type Hyd(s) description (origin) 1-Yr 2-Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1 SBUH Runoff — — 0.83 -- 1.35 1.68 2.11 — 2.74 74th Predevelopment 2 SBUH Runoff — --- 2.66 — 3.45 3.91 4.50 — 5.28 74th Post Development 3 Reservoir 2 0.81 — 1.31 1.67 2.11 --- 0.00 41111 • Proj. file: 74th Final Pond 3.gpw Run date: 05-25-2005 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve i Hydrograph Summary Report Page1 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph • No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SBUH Runofl 0.83 6 486 17,821 — -- -- 74th Predevelopment 2 SBUH Runoff 2.66 6 474 37,413 — -- — 74th Post Development 3 Reservoir 0.81 6 546 37,413 2 105.02 6,668 • I • Proj. file: 74th Final Pond 3.gpw Return Period: 2 yr Run date: 05-25-2005 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Pagel 411/ Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time lime to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cult) (ft) (cuft) 1 SBUH Runoff 1.35 6 486 26,322 — — — 74th Predevelopment 2 SBUH Runoff 3.45 6 474 48,542 — — — 74th Post Development 3 Reservoir 1.31 6 528 48,542 2 106.21 8,686 • • Proj. file: 74th Final Pond 3.gpw Return Period: 5 yr Run date: 05-25-2005 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Page1 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time I Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph • No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SBUH Runofl 1.68 6 486 31,582 — — — 74th Predevelopment 2 SBUH Runofl 3.91 6 474 55,079 — --- — 74th Post Development 1 3 Reservoir 1.67 6 510 55,079 2 106.95 9,842 • • Proj. file: 74th Final Pond 3.gpw Return Period: 10 yr Run date: 05-25-2005 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Summary Report Page 1 • Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (tuft) 1 SBUH Runoff 2.11 6 486 38,591 — ---- — 74th Predevelopment 2 SBUH Runof 4.50 6 474 63,515 — -- — 74th Post Development 3 Reservoir 2.11 6 504 63,515 2 108.10 11,364 • . I • • Proj. file: 74th Final Pond 3.gpw Return Period: 25 yr Run date: 05-25-2005 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve 1 Hydrograph Summary Report Page1 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph III No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SBUH Runoff 2.74 6 480 48,275 — --- -- 74th Predevelopment 2 SBUH Runoff 5.28 6 474 74,804 — -- ----- 74th Post Development 3 Reservoir 0.00 6 0 0 2 0.00 0 III • Proj. file: 74th Final Pond 3.gpw Return Period: 100 yr Run date: 05-25-2005 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph Report Pagel • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd, No. 3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.81 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 2 Reservoir name = preliminary pond Max. Elevation = 105.02 ft Max. Storage = 6,668 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=37,413 cuff Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 2.20 0.04 100.07 0.01 --- ---- --- -- ---- ---- 0.01 2.30 0.05 100.10 0.02 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.02 2.40 0.06 100.13 0.04 ---- ---- --- ---- 0.04 2.50 0.07 100.16 0.05 --- ---- ---- --- - ---- -- 0.05 2.60 0.08 100.18 0.07 ---- ---- --- ---- -- -- -- 0.07 2.70 0.09 100.19 0.08 --- --- ---- --- - -- ---- 0.08 2.80 0.10 100.21 0.09 - - -- --- -- ---- -- ---- 0.09 2.90 0.11 100.22 0.10 -- ---- --- -- -- ---- ---- 0.10 3.00 0.11 100.24 0.10 -- --- ---- --- ---- --- 0.10 • 3.10 0.12 100.25 0.11 ---- ---- --- ---- --- ---- --- 0.11 3.20 0.13 100.26 0.122 0.12 3.30 0.14 100.27 0.13 - - --- --- - ---- 0.13 3.40 0.14 100.29 0.13 - - - --- ---- 0.13 3.50 0.15 100.30 0.14 --- --- ---- 0.14 3.60 0.16 100.32 0.15 ---- -- 0.15 3.70 0.18 100.34 0.16 -- --- -- --- 0.16 3.80 0.19 100.37 0.17 --- ---- --- ---- -- 0.17 3.90 0.20 100.39 0.18 --- --- ---- --- ---- -- --- 0.18 4.00 0.21 100.42 0.19 ---- -- ---- ---- --- - - ---- 0.19 4.10 0.22 100.45 0.20 - -- ---- -- ---- --- 0.20 4.20 0.23 100.47 0.21 ---- -- -- ---- ---- --- 0.21 4.30 0.24 100.48 0.21 --- -- - ---- 0.21 4.40 0.25 100.50 0.21 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.21 4.50 0.26 100.51 0.22 --- ----- -- 0.22 4.60 0.27 100.53 0.23 -- -- ---- ---- 0.23 4.70 0.28 100.55 0.23 --- ----- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.23 4.80 0.29 100.58 0.24 ---- - - --- ---- -- --- 0.24 4.90 0.31 100.60 0.25 ---- --- ---- -- ---- 0.25 5.00 0.32 100.63 0.25 --- -- -- ---- ---- --- 0.25 5.10 0.34 100.67 0.26 ---- -- - ----- -- -- 0.26 5.20 0.36 100.70 0.27 --- --- --- - ---- 0.27 5.30 0.37 100.74 0.28 ----- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.28 5.40 0.39 100.79 0.29 --- -- --- ---- ---- --- -- 0.29 5.50 0.40 100.83 0.30 -- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.30 5.60 0.41 100.88 0.31 --- ---- --- -- --- ---- 0.31 5.70 0.42 100.93 0.32 --- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.32 5.80 0.44 100.96 ` 0.33 ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.33 5.90 0.46 101.00 0.34 --- ---- ---- 0.34 • Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table • Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 6.00 0.48 101.04 0.35 ---- ---- ---- --- 0.35 6.10 0.51 101.09 0.36 ---- 6.20 --6.20 0.54 101.15 0.37 6.30 0.57 101.21 0.38 -- --- ---- -- 0.38 6.40 0.59 101.27 0.39 ---- ----- ---- _-__ -__ ---- _-- ---- 0.39 6.50 0.60 101.34 0.40 ---- - - ---- -- ----- 0.40 6.60 0.60 101.40 0.41 6.70 0.58 101.45 0.42 --- --- --- - -- --- 0.42 6.80 0.59 101.50 0.43 --- --- ---- ---- -- ---- ---- 0.43 6.90 0.62 101.55 0.44 ---- ---- -- - --- 0.44 7.00 0.65 101.60 0.44 ---- -- - -- -- -- ---- 0.44 7.10 0.69 101.67 0.45 ---- --- --- --- --- ---- 0.45 7.20 0.75 101.74 0.46 ---- -- -- ---- 0.46 7.30 0.81 101.83 0.48 --- -- _-_ ___ ____ ____ 0.48 7.40 0.88 101.92 0.49 - - - - ---- --- 0.49 7.50 0.97 102.03 0.51 --- -- ---- ---- -- --- 0.51 7.60 1.50 102.22 0.53 --- ---- --- ---- 0.53 7.70 2.20 102.53 0.57 - --- --- --- --- ----- 0.57 7.80 2.52 102.94 0.62 -- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.62 7.90 2.66 << 103.38 0.66 ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- -- 0.66 8.00 2.65 103.80 0.70 ---- -- ---- - ---- --- 0.70 8.10 2.26 104.17 0.74 ---- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.74 8.20 1.73 104.43 0.76 --- -- __ _ • 8.30 1.44 104.60 0.78 ---- --- -- -- ---- --- ---- 0.78 8.40 1.24 104.71 0.79 -- --- --- ---- ---- 0.79 8.50 1.09 104.79 0.80 --- ---- -- ---- -- 0.80 8.60 1.06 104.85 0.80 -- --- -- -- --- ---- 0.80 8.70 1.06 104.90 0.80 --- ---- - -- ---- --- 0.80 8.80 1.00 104.95 0.81 --- -- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.81 8.90 0.94 104.98 0.81 ---- -- -- ---- ---- 0.81 9.00 0.89 105.01 0.81 - - - - - 0.81 9.10 0.83 105.02 0.81 ___ --- --- ____ _-__ 0.81 « 9.20 0.78 105.01 0.81 - -- - ---- - ---- 0.81 9.30 0.74 105.00 0.81 --- --- --- ---- --- 0.81 9.40 0.71 104.98 0.81 -- -- ---- --- -- -- 0.81 9.50 0.69 104.96 0.81 --- - --- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.81 9.60 0.67 104.93 0.81 --- -- --- -- --- 0.81 9.70 0.66 104.90 0.80 ---- -- ---- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.80 9.80 0.66 104.88 0.80 --- --- ---- - ---- ---- -- 0.80 9.90 0.65 104.85 0.80 ---- ---- - --- 0.80 10.00 0.64 104.81 0.80 -- -- --- --- --- 0.80 10.10 0.64 104.78 0.79 -- ---- --- --- ---- --- ---- 0.79 10.20 0.62 104.75 0.79 - --- -- --- ---- 0.79 10.30 0.60 104.71 0.79 ---- --- _- ____ --_ _-- 0.79 10.40 0.59 104.67 0.78 - - --- -- --- --- 0.78 10.50 0.58 104.63 0.78 --- - ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.78 10.60 0.58 104.59 0.78 ---- -- - ---- -- 0.78 10.70 0.58 104.54 0.77 -- --- -- -- ---- 0.77 10.80 0.57 104.50 0.77 --- --- -- -- 0.77 10.90 0.56 104.46 0.77 0.77 11.00 0.55 104.42 0.76 ---- ---- --- --- - 0.76 0 Continues on next page... Page 3 • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 11.10 0.55 104.38 0.76 ---- - ----- -- 0.76 11.20 0.54 104.33 0.75 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- 0.75 11.30 0.53 104.28 0.75 --- ---- ----- --- -- ---_ ---- ---- 0.75 11.40 0.52 104.24 0.75 ---- --- ----- -- --- --_ ---- - 0.75 11.50 0.51 104.19 0.74 ---- ----- - ---- 0.74 11.60 0.49 104.14 0.74 - ---- ---- --- ---- ----- 0.74 11.70 0.48 104.09 0.73 -- --- -- - --- ---- -- ___- 0.73 11.80 0.47 104.03 0.73 --- ---- - - ---- ---- 0.73 11.90 0.47 103.98 0.72 -- -- -- --- ---- - --- 0.72 12.00 0.47 103.93 0.72 --- -- --- ---_ _-- ---- 0.72 12.10 0.46 103.87 0.71 --- --- ---- --- 0.71 12.20 0.46 103.82 0.71 --- ---- ---- 0.71 12.30 0.47 103.77 0.70 ---- --- ---- --- --- 0.70 12.40 0.47 103.72 0.70 -- -- ----- --- 0.70 12.50 0.48 103.67 0.69 ---- -- ---- 0.69 12.60 0.47 103.63 0.69 -- -- _-- ___- -___ -- 0.69 12.70 0.46 103.58 0.68 --- ---- --- ---- ----- - 0.68 12.80 0.45 103.53 0.68 - ---- ---- --- --_- ---- --- 0.68 12.90 0.45 103.48 0.67 -- ---- --- -- ---- --- --- 0.67 13.00 0.45 103.43 0.67 ---- _-- --- _-_ --- --- --- 0.67 13.10 0.45 103.39 0.66 - --- ---- -- ---- ---- - 0.66 13.20 0.46 103.34 0.66 -- __-_ -__ -- --_ - - 0.66 • 13.30 0.45 103.30 0.65 -- __-- __ =-= -- __- 0.65 13.40 0.45 103.26 0.65 0.65 13.50 0.44 103.21 0.65 ---- ---- --- -- --- ---- 0.65 13.60 0.44 103.16 0.64 --- --- --- -- --- --- 0.64 13.70 0.43 103.12 0.64 - ---- - ---- --- --- O.64 13.80 0.43 103.07 0.63 ---- ----- --- -- ---- ---- 0.63 13.90 0.42 103.03 0.63 --- ---- ---- ---- 0.63 14.00 0.42 102.98 0.62 ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- 0.62 14.10 0.42 102.94 0.62 --- -- -- _-- ___- 0.62 14.20 0.42 102.90 0.61 ---- -- ---- -- --- ---- 0.61 14.30 0.42 102.85 0.61 ---- --- - --- --- 0.61 14.40 0.42 102.81 0.60 -- -- -- -- ---- 0.60 14.50 0.42 102.77 0.60 --- ----- ----- -- --- --- ---- 0.60 14.60 0.42 102.73 0.59 -- ---- -- - 0.59 14.70 0.42 102.69 0.59 --- ---- - -- ---_ -_- 0.59 14.80 0.41 102.65 0.58 --- --- ---- - --- ---- --- 0.58 14.90 0.41 102.61 0.58 -- - ---- -- ---- ---- ----- 0.58 15.00 0.41 102.57 0.57 --- --- ---- ---- --- 0.57 15.10 0.41 102.53 0.57 ---- -__ ____ 0.57 15.20 0.41 102.50 0.56 -- ---- ---- 0.56 15.30 0.41 102.46 0.56 ---- ---- ---- --- --- --- 0.56 15.40 0.40 102.42 0.56 -- --- --- -- --- ----- 0.56 15.50 0.40 102.39 0.55 - --- -- ---- ---- ---- -- 0.55 15.60 0.40 102.35 0.55 ---- -- ---- --- ---- -- 0.55 15.70 0.40 102.32 0.54 15.80 0.40 102.28 0.54 ---- --- --- ---- 0.54 15.90 0.40 102.24 0.53 ----- --- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.53 16.00 0.39 102.21 0.53 -- --- --- -- -- --- ---- 0.53 16.10 0.39 102.18 0.52 -- ---- -- ----- -- --- --- 0.52 • Continues on next page... Page 4 Hydrograph Discharge Table • Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ESI Outflow • (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 16.20 0.39 102.14 0.52 ---- -- ---- ---- ---- 0.52 16.30 0.39 102.11 0.52 --- --- - 0.52 16.40 0.39 102.08 0.51 --- - -- --- -- ---- 0.51 16.50 0.38 102.05 0.51 ---- ---- -- -- --- 0.51 16.60 0.38 102.01 0.50 ---- -- - ---- ---- --- -- 0.50 16.70 0.38 101.98 0.50 - ---- -- - -- --- -- 0.50 16.80 0.38 101.95 0.50 --- --- --- - -- --- ---- -- 0.50 16.90 0.38 101.93 0.49 --- --- --- --- -- - 0.49 17.00 0.38 101.90 0.49 -- ---- ---- ---- --- --- -- 0.49 17.10 0.37 101.87 0.48 ---- ---- ---- -- --- ---- 0.48 17.20 0.37 101.84 0.48 ----- --- -- -- - - --- 0.48 17.30 0.37 101.81 0.47 ---- --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 0.47 17.40 0.37 101.78 0.47 --- - ---- --- ---- -- 0.47 17.50 0.37 101.75 0.47 - - -- ---- 0.47 17.60 0.36 101.72 0.46 --- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.46 17.70 0.36 101.69 0.46 --- ---- ____ ____ _ 046 17.80 0.36 101.67 0.45 ---- --- ---- 0.45 17.90 0.36 101.64 0.45 --- 18.00 0.36 101.61 0.45 --- --- ---- ---- - 0.45 18.10 0.36 101.59 0.44 ---- ---- --- --__ 0.44 18.20 0.35 101.57 0.44 -- ---- ---- ___ ___ -__ ____ 0.44 18.30 0.35 101.54 0.43 ---- --- ---- --- ----- ---- 0.43 18.40 0.35 101.52 0.43 - ---- ---- --- 0.43 IP/18.50 0.35 101.50 0.43 --- --- --- ---- --- 0.43 18.60 0.35 101.47 0.42 ---- ___ ____ ____ -__ - 0.42 18.70 0.34 101.45 0.42 - - - --- ---- ---- --- 0.42 18.80 0.34 101.43 0.42 --- --- --- --- ----- -- - ---- ---- 0.42 18.90 0.34 101.41 0.41 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.41 19.00 0.34 101.38 0.41 ---- - - --- -- 0.41 19.10 0.34 101.36 0.41 ---- ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- 0.41 19.20 0.33 101.34 0.40 -- ---- -- --- _--_ _-- -- 0.40 19.30 0.33 101.32 0.40 - --- --- --- -- ---- 0.40 19.40 0.33 101.30 0.39 --- --- -- ---- - --- ---- 0.39 19.50 0.33 101.27 0.39 -- ----- - -- -- - - 0.39 19.60 0.33 101.25 0.39 -- -- - - -- --- --- 0.39 19.70 0.33 101.23 0.38 -- --- ---- ----- --- -- --- 0.38 19.80 0.32 101.21 0.38 --- ---- --- -_- ---- -- 0.38 19.90 0.32 101.20 0.38 -- ---- ---- --- --- ---- - 0.38 20.00 0.32 101.18 0.37 --- --- --- -- -- . ---- 0.37 20.10 0.32 101.16 0.37 - -- - -- ----- ---- ---- 0.37 20.20 0.32 101.14 0.37 ---- - -- ---- -- -- ---- ---- 0.37 20.30 0.31 101.13 0.36 --- --- ---- -- -- -- 0.36 20.40 0.31 101.11 0.36 -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.36 20.50 0.31 101.09 0.36 ---- ---- 0.36 20.60 0.31 101.08 0.35 ---- 0.35 20.70 0.31 101.06 0.35 -- ---- --- --- ----- ---- 0.35 20.80 0.30 101.05 0.35 --- -- --- --- --- 0.35 20.90 0.30 101.03 0.35 -- ---- ---- -- -- ---- 0.35 21.00 0.30 101.02 0.34 --- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.34 21.10 0.30 101.01 0.34 --- ---- - 0.34 21.20 0.30 100.99 0.34 ---- ---- - 0.34 • Continues on next page... Page 5 • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 21.30 0.30 100.98 0.33 --- ----- ---- -- ---- 0.33 21.40 0.29 100.96 0.33 ---- ---- --- ---- 0.33 21.50 0.29 100.95 0.33 ---- --- ---- ---- --- 0.33 21.60 0.29 100.94 0.33 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- 0.33 21.70 0.29 100.92 0.32 -- --- --- ----- 0.32 21.80 0.29 100.91 0.32 ---- --- -- --- - ---- ---- 0.32 21.90 0.28 100.89 0.32 ---- -- --- --- ---- - ---- 0.32 22.00 0.28 100.88 0.31 --- ---- --- -- --- 0.31 22.10 0.28 100.86 0.31 --- --- --- ---- -- ---- 0.31 22.20 0.28 100.85 0.31 ---- -- --- ---- --- --- 0.31 22.30 0.28 100.84 0.30 ---- -- ---- --- ---- 0.30 22.40 0.27 100.82 0.30 ---- ---- ---- --- ---- --- 0.30 22.50 0.27 100.81 0.30 - - -- _-_ ____ ___ __- 0.30 22.60 0.27 100.80 0.30 - -- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.30 22.70 0.27 100.79 0.29 -- --- --- ---- ----- 0.29 22.80 0.27 100.78 0.29 --- ---- ---- ---- 0.29 22.90 0.26 100.77 0.29 --- -- ---- - ---- 0.29 23.00 0.26 100.75 0.29 --- ----- --- --- ---- -- --- 0.29 23.10 0.26 100.74 0.28 ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- --- 0.28 23.20 0.26 100.73 0.28 ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- 028 23.30 0.26 100.72 0.28 - ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.28 23.40 0.26 100.71 0.28 ----- --- ---- --- -- --- --- 0.28 23.50 0.25 100.71 0.27 • _ - - --- -- �_ - 0.27 23.60 0.25 100.70 0.27 - - 0.27 23.70 0.25 100.69 0.27 ---- --- ---_ -__- --- --- 0.27 23.80 0.25 100.68 0.27 --- - --- --- -- -- 0.27 23.90 0.25 100.67 0.26 ----- ---- ---- --- --- ---- 0.26 24.00 0.24 100.66 0.26 --- -- ---- --- ---- 0.26 24.10 0.00 100.60 0.25 - ---- -- --- -- ---- 0.25 24.20 0.00 100.49 0.21 ---- -- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.21 24.30 0.00 100.30 0.14 --- --- -- --- ---- 0.14 24.40 0.00 100.17 0.06 24.50 --24.50 0.00 100.11 0.03 --- --- -- ---- 0.03 24.60 0.00 100.08 0.02 ---- --- - -- __-_ --_ 0.02 24.70 0.00 100.06 0.01 --- ---- -- ----- --- ----- --- 0.01 ...End • Hydrograph Report Page, Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.31 cfs Storm frequency = 5 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 2 Reservoir name = preliminary pond Max. Elevation = 106.21 ft Max. Storage = 8,686 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=48,542 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 1.90 0.05 100.09 0.02 --- --- --- - ---- --- 0.02 2.00 0.06 100.12 0.04 ---- -- -_- ----- --- 0.04 2.10 0.08 100.16 0.06 --- - - ---- ---- ---- 0.06 2.20 0.10 100.19 0.07 - --- --- ---- --- 0.07 2.30 0.11 100.22 0.09 ---- ---- --- ---- ---- 0.09 2.40 0.12 100.24 0.11 --- -- ---- --- -- 0.11 2.50 0.14 100.26 0.12 --- --- ---- --- --- 0.12 2.60 0.15 100.29 0.13 - --- ---- ---- --- ____ ____ -_ 0.13 2.70 0.16 100.31 0.14 --- --- -- 0.14 2.80 0.17 100.33 0.16 -- - ---- ---- ---- --- --- 0.16 • 2.90 0.18 100.36 0.17 ---- ---- ---- - - 0.17 3,00 0.19 100.38 0.18 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.18 3.10 0.20 100.41 0.18 3.20 --3.20 0.21 100.43 0.19 -- ---- --- - -- ---- 0.19 3.30 0.22 100.45 0.20 ---- --- ---- --- 0.20 3.40 0.23 100.47 0.21 --- --- ---- --- --- 0.21 3.50 0.24 100.48 0.21 - --- - ---- - 0.21 3.60 0.26 100.50 0.22 --- -- --- --- -- -- 0.22 3.70 0.27 100.52 0.22 ---- 3.80 --3.80 0.29 100.55 0.23 ---- --- -- - --- 0.23 3.90 0.30 100.58 0.24 ---- ---- --- -- --- --- -- 0.24 4.00 0.32 100.61 0.25 - --- -- -- ---- -- --- 0.25 4.10 0.33 100.64 0.26 ---- --- - --- --- - --- 0.26 4.20 0.34 100.67 0.27 ---- -- --- -- -- _- ___ 0.27 4.30 0.35 100.71 , 0.27 -- -- ---- --- ---- --- ---- 0.27 4.40 0.36 100.74 0.28 --- -- -- ---- 0.28 4.50 0.38 100.78 0.29 ---- ---- ---- ----- --- --- 0.29 4.60 0.39 100.82 0.30 --__ - __- ____ ___ - 0.30 4.70 0.41 100.86 0.31 -- - ---- - --- ---- 0.31 4.80 0.42 100.91 0.32 -- --- -- ---- --- -- 0.32 4.90 0.44 100.95 0.33 --- -- --- --- --- ---- ---- 0.33 5.00 0.46 100.99 0.34 --- ---- --- -- --- ---- --- 0.34 5.10 0.48 101.04 0.35 ---- --- --- -- 0.35 5.20 0.51 101.08 0.36 -- --- --- -- --- 0.36 5.30 0.53 101.14 0.37 - - - ---- ----- -- --- 0.37 5.40 0.55 101.19 0.38 --- ---- --- --- -- 0.38 5.50 0.56 101.25 0.39 -- --- --- ---- --- 0.39 5.60 0.58 101.31 0.40 ---- --- -- --- --- 0.40 • Continues on next page... Page 2 • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ESI Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 5.70 0.59 101.37 0.41 0.41 5.80 0.61 101.43 0.42 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.42 5.90 0.63 101.49 0.43 ---- --- ---- ---- 0.43 6.00 0.65 101.55 0.44 --- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.44 6.10 0.69 101.61 0.45 ----- ---- ---- 0.45 6.20 0.74 101.69 0.46 -- -- --- ---- - 0.46 6.30 0.77 101.77 0.47 --- ---- -- --- -- -- ---- --- 0.47 6.40 0.79 101.86 0.48 --- -- -- ---- ---- - 0.48 6.50 0.81 101.94 0.49 ---- ----- ---- ---- --- --- ---- 0.49 6.60 0.80 102.02 0.50 ----- ---- --- -- --- 0.50 6.70 0.78 102.09 0.51 ---- --- ---- --- -- -- 0.51 6.80 0.79 102.16 0.52 ---- --- ---- ---- - -___ --- 0.52 6.90 0.82 102.23 0.53 -- - --- --- -- ---- ---- -- 0.53 7.00 0.87 102.31 0.54 7.10 0.92 102.39 0.55 --- --- _-- -- - --- 0.55 7.20 0.99 102.49 0.56 -- -- ---- --- ---- 0.56 7.30 1.07 102.60 0.58 --- -- ---- -- ---- ---- 0.58 7.40 1.17 102.72 0.59 ---- ---- --- --- ---- ---- 0.59 7.50 1.28 102.87 0.61 ---- --- --- ---- ---- 0.61 7.60 1.97 103.09 0.63 ---- - ---- --- ---- 0.63 7.70 2.88 103.48 0.67 --- ---- --- 0.67 7.80 3.29 103.99 0.72 --- - ----- ---- --- 0.72 • 7.90 3.45 « 104.54 0.77 _ - --- ---- - ---- 0.77 8.00 3.43 105.09 0.82 0.82 8.10 2.92 105.56 0.86 0.22 ----- -- ---- -- ---- --- 1.08 8.20 2.23 105.87 0.88 0.32 ---- ---- ---- -- --- - -- 1.20 8.30 1.85 106.05 0.90 0.37 --- ---- --- --- ---- ---- ---- 1.26 8.40 1.59 106.15 0.90 0.39 ---- ---- -- ---- -- 1.29 8.50 1.40 106.19 0.91 0.40 - ____ ___ -__ 1.31 8.60 1.36 106.21 0.91 0.40 --- --- --- 1.31 8.70 1.35 106.21 0.91 0.40 --- ---- ---- --- -- ----- 1.31 8.80 1.28 106.22 0.91 0.40 -- ---- ---- -- 1.31 « 8.90 1.20 106.20 0.91 0.40 - ---- ---- -- --- 1.31 9.00 1.14 106.17 0.91 0.39 --- ---- ---- --- -- 1.30 9.10 1.06 106.13 0.90 0.38 - - - --- --- ---- 1.29 9.20 0.99 106.07 . 0.90 0.37 --- -- _-_- ____ ____ 1.27 9.30 0.95 106.01 0.89 0.36 - -- ---- -- ---- 1.25 9.40 0.91 105.94 0.89 0.34 --- ---- --- 123 9.50 0.88 105.87 0.88 0.32 ---- ---- 1.20 9.60 0.85 105.80 0.88 0.30 ---- --- ---- 1.18 9.70 0.84 105.73 0.87 0.28 -- -- --- 1.15 9.80 0.84 105.67 0.87 0.26 - ---- ---- 1.13 9.90 0.83 105.61 0.86 0.24 ---- ---- ---- -_-- 1.10 10.00 0.81 105.55 0.86 0.22 ---- -- ---- ---- --- --- 1.07 10.10 0.81 105.50 0.85 0.19 -- --- -- - 1.05 10.20 0.79 105.45 0.85 0.17 - -- --- ---- __-- - 1.02 10.30 0.76 105.40 0.85 0.14 --- -- --- 0.99 10.40 0.74 105.36 0.84 0.11 --- ----- ---- --- 0.95 10.50 0.73 105.31 0.84 0.08 --- -- --- ---- 0.92 10.60 0.73 105.28 0.84 0.06 --- --- -- ---- ---- 0.89 • 10.70 0.73 105.25 0.83 0.04 - --- ---- ---- --- 0.87 Continues on next page... Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table • Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 10.80 0.73 105.22 0.83 0.02 -- -- ---- --- ---- 0.86 10.90 0.72 105.19 0.83 0.01 ---- _--_ 11.00 0.70 105.16 0.83 0.01 ---- - -- ---- 0.83 11.10 0.69 105.14 0.82 0.00 - -- --- --- --- 0.83 11.20 0.68 105.11 0.82 ---- --- --- ---- -- 0.82 11.30 0.67 105.08 0.82 - - - - - - ---- 0.82 11.40 0.65 105.04 0.82 --- --- ____ ____ ___ 0.82 11.50 0.64 105.01 0.81 - -- -- ---- -- ---- 0.81 11.60 0.63 104.97 0.81 ---- - - - 0.81 11.70 0.61 104.93 0.81 - -- -- ---- ---- ---- 0.81 11.80 0.60 104.89 0.80 - -- -- --- -- --- ---- 0.80 11.90 0.59 104.85 0.80 -- -- ---- - - 0.80 12.00 0.59 104.80 0.80 --- -- ---- --- 0.80 12.10 0.59 104.76 0.79 --- --- ----- ---- 0.79 12.20 0.59 104.72 0.79 ----- --- --- 0.79 12.30 0.59 104.68 0.79 --- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.79 12.40 0.60 104.64 0.78 --- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.78 12.50 0.60 104.60 0.78 - - - - - --- 0.78 12.60 0.60 104.56 0.78 ---- -- -- --- --- ---- ---- 0.78 12.70 0.58 104.53 0.77 ---- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.77 12.80 0.57 104.48 0.77 - -- -- - --- 0.77 12.90 0.57 104.44 0.76 --- ---- --- ---- 0.76 13.00 0.56 104.40 0.76 - ---- ---- ---- 0.76 ID 13.10 0.57 104.36 0.76 ---- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.76 13.20 0.58 104.32 0.75 - --- --- --- 0.75 13.30 0.57 104.29 0.75 ---- ---- ----- --- --- ---- 0.75 13.40 0.57 104.25 0.75 --- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- 0.75 13.50 0.56 104.21 0.74 13.60 0.55 104.17 0.74 ---- -- ---- ---- ---- 0.74 13.70 0.54 104.13 0.74 ---- ---- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- 0.74 13.80 0.54 104.09 0.73 ---- ---- 0.73 13.90 0.54 104.05 0.73 ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.73 14.00 0.53 104.01 0.72 ---- --- --- --- 0.72 14.10 0.53 103.97 0.72 --- - - - 0.72 14.20 0.54 103.93 0.72 ----- --- -- ---- ---- 0.72 14.30 0.53 103.89 0.71 ---- ---- --- --- -- ---- --- 0.71 14.40 0.53 103.86 0.71 -- --- ---- - --- 0.71 14.50 0.53 103.82 0.71 --- ----- --- --- --- ---- 0.71 14.60 0.53 103.78 0.70 --- --- --- - -- -- --- 0.70 14.70 0.53 103.74 0.70 --- --- --- --- ---- ---- 0.70 14.80 0.52 103.71 0.70 -__ ___ ____ ___ --- 0.70 14.90 0.52 103.67 0.69 ---- ---- -- - -- --- ---- 0.69 15.00 0.52 103.63 0.69 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.69 15.10 0.52 103.59 0.68 -- --- --- --- -- ----- 0.68 15.20 0.51 103.56 0.68 -- --- ---- ---- ---- -- -- 0.68 15.30 0.51 103.52 0.68 -- --- 0.68 15.40 0.51 103.49 0.67 ---- -- --- -- ---- ---- 0.67 15.50 0.51 103.45 0.67 ---- -- --- --- -- ---- ---- 0.67 15.60 0.50 103.42 0.67 --- ---- -- ---- ---- ---- 0.67 15.70 0.50 103.38 0.66 --- --- --- --- 0.66 15.80 0.50 103.35 0.66 ---- ---- ---- --- -- 0.66 • Continues on next page... Page 4 • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 15.90 0.50 103.31 0.66 -- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.66 16.00 0.50 103.28 0.65 ---- ---- - - 0.65 16.10 0.49 103.24 0.65 - ---- ---- - ----- --- 0.65 16.20 0.49 103.21 0.65 ---- --- ----- -- 0.65 16.30 0.49 103.17 0.64 --- --- --- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.64 16.40 0.49 103.14 0.64 ---- - -- ---- -- -- 0.64 16.50 0.48 103.11 0.63 - ---- --- - --- -- 0.63 16.60 0.48 103.07 0.63 ---- ---- - --- -- --- 0.63 16.70 0.48 103.04 0.63 --- - -- --- ---- ---- 0.63 16.80 0.48 103.01 0.62 --- ----- ---- ---- -- --- 0.62 16.90 0.47 102.97 0.62 --- ---- ---- -- -- 0.62 17.00 0.47 102.94 0.62 ---- - - --- ---- 0.62 17.10 0.47 102.91 0.61 ---- --- -- ---- 0.61 17.20 0.47 102.88 0.61 - -- ---- - ----- --- --- 0.61 17.30 0.47 102.85 0.61 --- - --- ---- --- 0.61 17.40 0.46 102.81 0.60 --- -- ---- ---- -- 0.60 17.50 0.46 102.78 0.60 ---- ___ ____ __- _____ --- 0.60 17.60 0.46 102.75 0.59 -- - ---- ---- ---- --- 0.59 17.70 0.46 102.72 .0.59 -- -- ---- -- ---- 0.59 17.80 0.45 102.69 0.59 --- ---- --- -_ -- --- ---- 0.59 17.90 0.45 102.65 0.58 --- ---- -_-- --- ---- 0.58 18.00 0.45 102.62 0.58 ---- --- ----- _--- --- 0.58 • 18.10 0.45 ' 102.59 0.58 ---- - - - - -- - _-_- -_--• 0.58 18.20 0.44 102.56 0.57 0.57 18.30 0.44 102.53 0.57 ---- --_ 0.57 18.40 0.44 102.50 0.57 -- ---- --- ----- --- -- 0.57 18.50 0.44 102.47 0.56 - --- ---- - - ----- --- 0.56 18.60 0.43 102.44 0.56 --- ---- -- --- ---- --- --- 0.56 18.70 0.43 102.41 0.55 ---- -- ---- ----- ---- --- - 0.55 18.80 0.43 102.38 0.55 ---- -- --- ---- --- ---- 0.55 18.90 0.43 102.36 0.55 ---- --- -_-- --- ---- --- 0.55 19.00 0.43 102.33 0.54 ---- -- -- -- - -- 0.54 19.10 0.42 102.30 0.54 --- -- - -- -- - 0.54 19.20 0.42 102.27 0.54 --- -- - --- ---- - ---- 0.54 19.30 0.42 102.24 0.53 - --- --- --- --- --- ---- 0.53 19.40 0.42 102.21 19.50 0.41 102.18 0.53 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.53 19.60 0.41 102.15 0.52 --- ---- ---- -- 0.52 19.70 0.41 102.12 0.52 - ---- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.52 19.80 0.41 102.10 0.51 -- --- -- _-- - -- 0.51 19.90 0.40 102.07 0.51 -- - - --- --- --- --- 0.51 20.00 0.40 102.04 0.51 -- --- ---- -__ ____ ____ ____ 0.51 20.10 0.40 102.02 0.50 --- --- --- -- -- 0.50 .20.20 0.40 101.99 0.50 --- -- ---- 0.50 20.30 0.39 101.96 0.50 -_-- ---- ----- ---- 0.50 20.40 0.39 101.94 0.49 -- - - ---- - - --- ---- 0.49 20.50 0.39 101.91 0.49 ----- --- ---- ----- 0.49 20.60 0.39 101.89 0.49 - - --- ---- ---- ---- 0.49 20.70 0.38 101.86 0.48 -- ---- ---- 0.48 20.80 0.38 101.83 0.48 ---- ---- ---- 0.48 20.90 0.38 101.81 0.47 ---- 0.47 • Continues on next page... Page 5 Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 21.00 0.38 101.78 0.47 -- --- ---- --- - ---- -- 0.47 21.10 0.38 101.75 0.47 --- -- - ---- -- 0.47 21.20 0.37 101.73 0.46 ---- ____ --- -- 0.46 21.30 0.37 101.70 0.46 --- - --- --- 0.46 21.40 0.37 101.68 0.46 - - - ---- --- 0.46 21.50 0.37 101.65 0.45 --- ---- ---- - -- -- - -- --- 0.45 21.60 0.36 101.63 0.45 --- --- --- -- -- ---- --- 0.45 21.70 0.36 101.60 0.44 - -- - - - --- --- 0.44 21.80 0.36 101.58 0.44 --- ---- 0.44 21.90 0.36 101.56 0.44 --- ---- ---- 0.44 22.00 0.35 101.53 0.43 --- ---- - - - ---- ---- 0.43 22.10 0.35 101.51 0.43 -- -- - --- --- 0.43 22.20 0.35 101.49 0.43 -- -- --- - 0.43 22.30 0.35 101.47 0.42 ---- -- ____ ___ ___ 0.42 22.40 0.34 101.45 0.42 -- - --- --- -- -- - ---- - - 0.42 22.50 0.34 101.42 0.42 -- -- ---- --- - ---- -- 0.42 22.60 0.34 101.40 0.41 -- ---- - - 0.41 22.70 0.34 101.38 0.41 - --- --- ---- 0.41 22.80 0.33 101.35 0.40 --- - --- --- -- ---- 0.40 22.90 0.33 101.33 0.40 --- - - ---- - - 0.40 23.00 0.33 101.31 0.40 --- 23.10 0.33 101.29 0.39 --- --- - ---- ---- -- ---- 0.39 23.20 0.32 101.26 0.39 ---- ---- - ---- -- 0.39 • 23.30 0.32 101.24 0.38 --- -- ---- - - - 0.38 23.40 0.32 101.22 0.38 -- ---- -- ---- 0.38 23.50 0.32 101.20 0.38 ---- -- -- -- 0.38 23.60 0.32 101.18 0.37 -- - ---- - -- 0.37 23.70 0.31 101.16 0.37 --- -- ---- --- 0.37 23.80 0.31 101.14 0.37 --- - - ---- --- -- --- 0.37 23.90 0.31 101.12 0.36 --- ---- --- -- - -- ---- 0.36 24.00 0.31 101.11 0.36 - ----- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.36 24.10 0.00 101.04 0.35 --- --- -- -- ----- -- ---- 0.35 24.20 0.00 100.92 0.32 ---- ___ -__ ____ ____ __ 0.32 24.30 0.00 100.78 0.29 -- - -- -- --- ----- --- -- 0.29 24.40 0.00 100.65 0.26 ---- - ---- -- - --- 0.26 24.50 0.00 100.54 0.23 -- - ---- -- - -- --- 0.23 24.60 0.00 100.40 0.18 --- ---- --- - - 0.18 24.70 0.00 100.21 0.09 --- -- -- --- ---- --- 0.09 24.80 0.00 100.13 0.04 -- -- - --- ---- 0.04 24.90 0.00 100.09 0.02 _- ____ ___ ____ ___ ___ 0.02 ...End • Hydrograph Report Page 1 • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.67 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 2 Reservoir name = preliminary pond Max. Elevation = 106.95 ft Max. Storage = 9,842 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=55,079 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ESI Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 1.80 0.06 100.11 0.03 ---- --- -- ---- ---- 0.03 1.90 0.08 100.15 0.05 - --- ---- ---- ---- 0.05 2.00 0.10 100.19 0.07 --- -- -- ---- 0.07 2.10 0.12 100.22 0.09 --- ---- -- --- 0.09 2.20 0.13 100.25 0.11 -- ---- -- --- ----- 0.11 2.30 0.15 100.28 0.13 - -- -- ---- -- ---- 0.13 2.40 0.17 100.31 0.14 --- ---- ---- --- --- ---- ---- 0.14 2.50 0.18 100.34 0.16 - ---- --- -- 0.16 2.60 0.20 100.37 0.17 --- -- ---- ----- --- 0.17 • 2.70 0.21 100.414 0.18 ---- --- --- --- --- ---- - 0.18 2.80 0.22 100.44 0.20 0.20 2.90 0.23 100.47 0.21 --- ---- • ---- ---- 0.21 3.00 0.24 100.48 0.21 --- - ---- ---- --- ---- -- 0.21 3.10 0.25 100.50 0.22 ---- -- _-__ --_- -__ --- _- 0.22 3.20 0.26 100.52 0.22 ---- 3.30 --3.30 0.27 100.54 0.23 --- -- ---- ---- --- 0.23 3.40 0.28 100.56 0.23 -- ---- ---- -- 0.23 3.50 0.30 100.58 0.24 ---- -- _- ___ 0.24 3.60 0.31 100.61 0.25 --- ---- --- --- ---- - 0.25 3.70 0.34 100.64 0.26 --- --- --- -- ---- 0.26 3.80 0.35 100.68 0.27 --- ---- ---- --- --- ---- 0.27 3.90 0.37 100.72 0.28 -- --- -- --- ---- --- ---- 0.28 4.00 0.38 100.76 0.29 ---- ---- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.29 4.10 0.40 100.81 0.30 ---- ---- --- --- ---- 0.30 4.20 0.41 100.85 0.31 --- ---- --- --- ---- ---- 0.31 4.30 0.42 100.90 0.32 --- --- --- -- --- --- ---- 0.32 4.40 0.43 100.94 0.33 ---- --- --- ---- --- 0.33 4.50 0.45 100.98 0.34 -- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.34 4.60 0.46 101.02 0.34 --- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.34 4.70 0.48 101.06 0.35 ---- -- ---- ----- 0.35 4.80 0.50 101.11 0.36 ---- 0.36 4.90 0.52 101.16 0.37 ---- ----- --- 0.37 5.00 0.54 101.21 0.38 5.10 0.57 101.27 0.39 ---- -- ---- --- 0.39 5.20 0.59 101.33 0.40 ---- --- ---- ---- - 0.40 5.30 0.62 101.40 0.41 ---- --- -- -- ---- ----- ---- 0.41 5.40 0.64 101.46 0.42 ---- ---- --- ---- --- 0.42 5.50 0.66 101.52 0.43 -- --- --- ---- --- --- - 0.43 • Continues on next page... Page 2 Hydrograph Discharge Table • Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 5.60 0.67 101.59 0.44 --- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.44 5.70 0.68 101.65 0.45 ---- ---- ---- --- ----- ---- 0.45 5.80 0.70 101.72 0.46 ---- --- -- 0.46 5.90 0.73 101.79 0.47 -- ---- ---- --- 0.47 6.00 0.76 101.87 0.48 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- 0.48 6.10 0.80 101.94 0.49 ---- - - -- ----- - - 0.49 6.20 0.85 102.03 0.51 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- --- -- 0.51 6.30 0.89 102.12 0.52 --- --- --- ---- -- -- 0.52 6.40 0.92 102.22 0.53 ---- --- -- - --- --- -- 0.53 6.50 0.94 102.32 0.54 ---- ---- ---- ---- -- 0.54 6.60 0.92 102.41 0.55 --- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.55 6.70 0.90 102.49 0.56 -- ---- 6.80 ---6.80 0.91 102.57 0.57 -- ---- --- ---- ---- --- 0.57 6.90 0.94 102.65 0.58 ---- -- ---- --- --- 0.58 7.00 0.99 102.74 0.59 - - --- --- --- --- -- ---- 0.59 7.10 1.06 102.84 0.61 -- -- --- ---- --- ----- 0.61 7.20 1.13 102.95 0.62 - ---- --- --- 0.62 7.30 1.23 103.08 0.63 - - ---- ---- 0.63 7.40 1.33 103.22 0.65 ---- --- ---- 0.65 7.50 1.46 103.38 0.66 --- --- ---- ---- 0.66 7.60 2.24 103.64 0.69 --- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- 0.69 7.70 3.28 104.07 0.73 --- --- ---- -- ---- 0.73 7.80 3.73 104.65 0.78 -- --- --- - ---- 0.78 III 7.90 3.91 « 105.27 0.84 0.05 --- ---- - ---- --_ - 0.89 8.00 3.88 105.88 0.88 0.32 -- -- --- -- --- --- 1.21 8.10 3.30 106.39 0.92 0.44 0.01 ---- --- -- ---- --- 1.37 8.20 2.52 106.72 0.95 0.50 0.12 ---- - -- ---- 1.57 8.30 2.09 106.88 0.96 0.53 0.16 ---- ---- --- 1.64 8.40 1.80 106.95 0.96 0.54 0.17 --- --- --- 1.67 8.50 1.58 106.95 0.96 0.54 0.17 ---- -- -- -- 1.67« 8.60 1.53 106.93 0.96 0.54 0.16 --- ---- 1.66 8.70 1.52 106.90 0.96 0.53 0.16 ---- -- 1.65 8.80 1.44 106.86 0.96 0.53 0.15 ---- ---- ---- 1.63 8.90 1.36 106.81 0.95 0.52 0.14 --- --- -- - 1.61 9.00 1.28 106.74 0.95 0.51 0.13 ---- --- -- 1.58 9.10 1.19 106.66 0.94 0.49 0.11 - - ---- ---- ----- 1.54 9.20 1.11 106.57 0.94 0.48 0.08 ---- --- --- --- --- 1.50 9.30 1.07 106.49 0.93 0.46 0.05 --- --- -- --- --- 1.44 9.40 1.02 106.41 0.92 0.44 0.02 ---- --- --- --- --- 1.38 9.50 0.99 106.33 0.92 0.43 0.00 ---- ---- ---- -- 1.35 9.60 0.95 106.25 0.91 0.41 ----- ---- -- ----- -- _-_ 1.32 9.70 0.95 106.17 0.91 0.39 ---- --- -- --- ---- --- 1.30 9.80 0.95 106.09 0.90 0.38 --- -- -- --- 1.28 9.90 0.93 106.02 0.89 0.36 --- ---- -- ---- --- 1.25 10.00 0.92 105.95 0.89 0.34 ---- --- -- 1.23 10.10 0.91 105.88 0.88 0.32 --- ---- --- 1.21 10.20 0.89 105.82 0.88 0.31 ---- --- --- ---- --- 1.19 10.30 0.85 105.76 0.87 0.29 -- -- ---- 1.16 10.40 0.84 105.69 0.87 0.27 --- 1.14 10.50 0.82 105.63 0.86 0.25 ---- --- ---- --- 1.11 10.60 0.82 105.57 0.86 0.22 --- --- --- ---- 1.08 • Continues on next page... Page 3 II Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 10.70 0.82 105.52 0.85 0.20 --- ---- 1.06 10.80 0.82 105.47 0.85 0.18 --- --- --- ---- 1.03 10.90 0.80 105.43 0.85 0.16 --- ---- -- 1.01 11.00 0.79 105.39 0.84 0.13 ---- ---- -- _-_ ---- 0.98 11.10 0.78 105.35 0.84 0.10 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.95 11.20 0.76 105.31 0.84 0.08 ---- ---- -- -- ---- 0.92 11.30 0.75 105.28 0.84 0.06 --- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.90 11.40 0.74 105.25 0.83 0.04 ---- - ____ --_ ___ 0.87 11.50 0.72 105.22 0.83 0.03 -- ---- -- - --- 0.86 11.60 0.70 105.19 0.83 0.01 ---- ---- -- --- --_ 0.84 11.70 0.69 105.16 0.83 0.01 ---- ---- -- --- 0.83 11.80 0.67 105.13 0.82 0.00 --- --- --- 0.83 11.90 0.67 105.10 0.82 --- ---- --- ---- ----- --- 0.82 12.00 0.66 105.07 0.82 ---- --- --- --- ---- --- --- 0.82 12.10 0.66 105.03 0.82 --- ---- ____ -__ ____ 0.82 12.20 0.66 105.00 0.81 -__ _- ____ --- 0.81 12.30 0.66 104.97 0.81 - --- ---- 0.81 12.40 0.67 104.94 0.81 --- --- ----- ----- ---- ---- 0.81 12.50 0.68 104.91 0.81 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.81 12.60 0.67 104.88 0.80 ---- ----- --- --- 0.80 12.70 0.65 104.85 0.80 --- -_ ----- ---- ---- ---- 0.80 12.80 0.64 104.82 0.80 -- ---- - 0.80 12.90 0.63 104.79 0.79 --- ---- ---- --- 0.79 • 13.00 0.63 104.76 0.79 ---- --- ---- --- 0.79 13.10 0.64 104.72 0.79 - - ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.79 13.20 0.65 104.69 0.79 ---- --- -- --- ____ 0.79 13.30 0.64 104.66 0.78 --- ---- -- --- --- 0.78 13.40 0.63 104.63 0.78 ---- -- ---- -_ ____ 0.78 13.50 0.62 104.60 0.78 -- -_ --- -- --- --- 0.78 13.60 0.62 104.57 0.78 ---- -- --- _-_ __- -_-_ --- 0.78 13.70 0.61 104.54 0.77 --- --- --- ---- -- 0.77 13.80 0.60 104.50 0.77 --- --- ---- -- 0.77 13.90 0.60 104.47 0.77 ---- ---- --- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.77 14.00 0.60 104.43 0.76 -- -- ---- --- -- ---- 0.76 14.10 0.60 104.40 0.76 ---- -- --- -- --- ---- 0.76 14.20 0.60 104.37 0.76 ---- ---- - --- ----- - 0.76 14.30 0.60 104.33 0.75 ---- --- -- ---- -- ----- ---- 0.75 14.40 0.60 104.30 0.75 ____ -- _-_ 14.50 0.59 104.27 0.75 --- -- --- -__- _-_ _-__ --__ 0.75 14.60 0.59 104.24 0.75 -- _-__ ____ _- -___ ---- -_- 0.75 14.70 0.59 104.20 0.74 --- --- --- ---- ---- -- ----- 0.74 14.80 0.59 104.17 0.74 --- ____ ___ ____ 0.74 14.90 0.58 104.14 0.74 --- ---- ---- ---- 0.74 15.00 0.58 104.10 0.73 ---- --- -- --- 0.73 15.10 0.58 104.07 0.73 -- ---- -- --- ---- 0.73 15.20 0.58 104.04 0.73 --- ---- -- _-__ ---- -- 0.73 15.30 0.57 104.01 0.72 ---- - - --- ---- ----- 0.72 15.40 0.57 103.98 0.72 --- -- --- ----- --- 0.72 15.50 0.57 103.94 0.72 ---- --- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.72 15.60 0.56 103.91 0.72 - - --- --- ---- --- -- 0.72 15.70 0.56 103.88 0.71 ---- • Continues on next page... Page 4 Hydrograph Discharge Table • Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 15.80 0.56 103.85 0.71 ---- ---- ---- 0.71 15.90 0.56 103.82 0.71 ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.71 16.00 0.55 103.79 0.70 ---- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.70 16.10 0.55 103.75 0.70 -- --- ----- ---- ---- --- 0.70 16.20 0.55 103.72 0.70 --- --- ----• -- ---- - ---- 0.70 16.30 0.55 103.69 0.69 16.40 0.54 103.66 0.69 --- -- --- ---- -- ---- ---- 0.69 16.50 0.54 103.63 0.69 --- ---- - --- -- ----- -- --- 0.69 16.60 0.54 103.60 0.68 --- -- -- --- --- -- - 0.68 16.70 0.54 103.56 0.68 -- -- -- --- --- ---- -- 0.68 16.80 0.53 103.53 0.68 --- -- - - ---- --- ---- 0.68 16.90 0.53 103.50 0.68 ---- -- -- -- ---- - ---- 0.68 17.00 0.53 103.47 0.67 --- ----- -- ---- --- ---- 0.67 17.10 0.53 103.44 0.67 . - - -- - --- ----- -- --- 0.67 17.20 0.52 103.41 0.67 --- --- -- -- --- 0.67 17.30 0.52 103.38 0.66 ---- -- ---- -- --__ 0.66 17.40 0.52 103.35 0.66 --- --- - --- --- -- 0.66 17.50 0.52 103.32 0.66 ---- ---- --- ---- -- --- ---- 0.66 17.60 0.51 103.29 0.65 --- -- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.65 17.70 0.51 103.25 0.65 --- --- ---- --- --- ----- --- 0.65 17.80 0.51 103.22 0.65 ---- - ---- -- -- 0.65 17.90 0.50 103.19 0.64 --- ---- • -- -_- -_ --- - 0.64 18.00 0.50 103.16 0.64 --- ---- --- -- -- ---- --- 0.64 • 18.10 0.50 103.13 0.64 --- ---- -- --- -- 0.64 18.20 0.50 103.10 0.63 ---- ---- ---- -- --- _-__ 0.63 18.30 0.49 103.07 0.63 --- ---- --- _-__ -- _-- _- 0.63 18.40 0.49 103.04 0.63 ---- --- --- - ---- 0.63 18.50 0.49 103.01 0.62 ---- ---- --- ---- --- --- - 0.62 18.60 0.49 102.98 0.62 ---- ---- -- --- ----- --- --- 0.62 18.70 0.48 102.95 0.62 --- ---- -- ---- - --- 0.62 18.80 0.48 102.92 0.61 -- - ---- --- --- ---- --- 0.61 18.90 0.48 102.89 0.61 -- --- --- -- ---- ---- --- 0.61 19.00 0.48 102.86 0.61 ---- --- -- --- --- --- -- - 0.61 19.10 0.47 102.83 0.60 --- --- --- --- -- 0.60 19.20 0.47 102.80 0.60 - ---- ---- --- --- 0.60 19.30 0.47 102.77 0.60 -- --- ---- ----- --- ---- 0.60 19.40 0.46 102.74 0.59 --- --- ____ -__ 0.59 19.50 0.46 102.71 0.59 ---- ----- --- --- ---- 0.59 19.60 0.46 102.68 0.59 --- --- --- . --- ---- 0.59 19.70 0.46 102.65 0.58 -- --- ---- ---- 0.58 19.80 0.45 102.62 0.58 ---- --- ---- ----- 0.58 19.90 0.45 102.59 0.58 ---- ---- ---- ---- -- 0.58 20.00 0.45 102.56 0.57 - -- --- ---- 0.57 20.10 0.45 102.53 0.57 ---- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.57 20.20 0.44 102.50 0.57 -- -- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.57 20.30 0.44 102.47 0.56 20.40 --20.40 0.44 102.44 0.56 ---- ---- -__ ____ 0.56 20.50 0.44 102.42 0.56 20.60 0.43 102.39 0.55 20.70 0.43 102.36 0.55 ---- ---- --- --- --- --- --- 0.55 20.80 0.43 102.33 0.54 ---- --- -- --- -- -- -- 0.54 • Continues on next page... Page 5 • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 20.90 0.42 102.30 0.54 ---- ---- ----- ---- -- ---- --- 0.54 21.00 0.42 102.27 0.54 ____ 0.54 21.10 0.42 102.24 0.53 -- --- --- ---- ---- 0.53 21.20 0.42 102.21 0.53 ---- - - --- 0.53 21.30 0.41 102.19 0.53 ---- - -- --- ---- -- ---- 0.53 21.40 0.41 102.16 0.52 -- --- -- -- --- --- 0.52 21.50 0.41 102.13 0.52 ---- - - -- - -- --- ---- 0.52 21.60 0.41 102.10 0.52 ----- --- -- -- ---- 0.52 21.70 0.40 102.07 0.51 ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.51 21.80 0.40 102.05 0.51 - -- ---- - 0.51 21.90 0.40 102.02 0.50 ---- ---- ---- ____ ____ 0.50 22.00 0.40 101.99 0.50 ---- --- -- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.50 22.10 0.39 101.97 0.50 -- ---- -- ---- 0.50 22.20 0.39 101.94 0.49 ---- - - --- - -- -- 0.49 22.30 0.39 101.91 0.49 --- -- - ---- --- 0.49 22.40 0.38 101.89 0.49 ---- ---- ---- 0.49 22.50 0.38 101.86 0.48 --- --- ----- ---- --- ---- 0.48 22.60 0.38 101.83 0.48 -- --- ---- --- ---- 0.48 22.70 0.38 101.80 0.47 ---- --- -_ -- 0.47 22.80 0.37 101.78 0.47 ---- --- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.47 22.90 0.37 101.75 0.47 -- --- --- --- 0.47 23.00 0.37 101.72 0.46 - - ---- ---- 0.46 • 23.10 0.37 101.70 0.46 23.20 0.36 101.67 0.45 ---- ---- ---- 0.45 23.30 0.36 101.64 0.45 --- ---- ---- - -- 0.45 23.40 0.36 101.62 0.45 ---- --- --- --- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.45 23.50 0.35 101.59 0.44 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.44 23.60 0.35 101.57 0.44 ---- --- --- --- ---- 0.44 23.70 0.35 101.54 0.43 ---- - - ---- --- -- 0.43 23.80 0.35 101.52 0.43 --- -- ----- ---_ __ ____ ____ 0.43 23.90 0.34 101.50 0.43 ---- - - - ---- --- -- 0.43 24.00 0.34 101.47 0.42 ---- - --- --- --- --- 0.42 24.10 0.00 101.40 0.41 ---- --- ---- -- -- ---- 0.41 24.20 0.00 101.27 0.39 - -- ---- --- --- ---- 0.39 24.30 0.00 101.14 0.37 - - - - ---- ---- --- 0.37 24.40 0.00 101.02 0.34 --- ___ ____ __ ---- 0.34 24.50 0.00 100.90 0.32 -- -- - 0.32 24.60 0.00 100.76 0.29 ---- -- --- --- ---- --- 0.29 24.70 0.00 100.63 0.25 ---- --- --- --- -- ----- 0.25 24.80 0.00 100.52 0.22 -- -- -- -- -- 0.22 24.90 0.00 100.36 0.17 ---- -- ---- - ---- 0.17 25.00 0.00 100.20 0.08 ----- ---- --- --- ----- 0.08 25.10 0.00 100.12 0.03 --- -- - -- ---- ----- ----- 0.03 25.20 0.00 100.08 0.02 ---- --- --- ---- 0.02 ...End • Hydrograph Report Page 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.11 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 2 Reservoir name = preliminary pond Max. Elevation = 108.10 ft Max. Storage = 11,364 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=63,515 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 1.70 0.08 100.14 0.04 --- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- 0.04 1.80 0.10 100.19 0.07 ---- --- -- --- --- ---- 0.07 1.90 0.12 100.23 0.10 - -- - --- - 0.10 2.00 0.14 100.26 0.12 -- ---- --- ---- --- ----- 0.12 2.10 0.17 100.30 0.14 --- --- --- ---- ---- -- -- ---- 0.14 2.20 0.19 100.34 0.16 ---- ---- -- --- - --- --- 0.16 2.30 0.21 100.38 0.17 ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- ---- ---- 0.17 2.40 0.23 100.43 0.19 --- ---- --- ---- ---- 0.19 2.50 0.24 100.47 0.21 -- - - --- --- 0.21 2.60 0.26 100.49 0.21 --- --- --- -- ---- --- 0.21 • 2.70 0.27 100.51 0.22 --- ---- ---- --- ----_ -- --- 0.22 2.80 0.29 100.54 0.23 --- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- --- 0.23 2.90 0.30 100.57 0.24 - --_ -- -- --- ----- -__- 0.24 3.00 0.31 100.60 0.25 --- ____ ___ -_ ____ _- ---- 0.25 3.10 0.32 100.63 0.25 3.20 0.33 100.66 0.26 ---- - --- -- - - --- --- 0.26 3.30 0.34 100.69 0.27 -- --- -- -- -- ___ _- 0.27 3.40 0.36 100.73 0.28 ----- - --- -- -- - ---- 0.28 3.50 0.37 100.76 0.29 - --- -- ----- --- --- 0.29 3.60 0.39 100.80 0.30 - -- --- ---- --- 0.30 3.70 0.42 100.85 0.31 --- - - ---- - 0.31 3.80 0.44 100.90 0.32 --- - ---- --- -- --- --- 0.32 3.90 0.45 100.95 0.33 -- --- -- ---- --- --- ---- 0.33 4.00 0.47 101.00 0.34 --- -- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.34 4.10 0.48 101.04 0.35 --- - - ----- ---- -- ---- 0.35 4.20 0.49 101.09 0.36 -- -- ---- ---- --- --- --- 0.36 4.30 0.51 101.13 0.37 --- - -- -- ---- ---- ----- 0.37 4.40 0.53 101.18 0.37 -- ---- 0.37 4.50 0.54 101.24 0.38 -- --- --- --- ---- --- 0.38 4.60 0.56 101.29 0.39 ---- - --- -- -- -- --- 0.39 4.70 0.58 101.35 0.40 --- ____ ____ ____ -__ -_- 0.40 4.80 0.60 101.41 0.41 ---- -- --- --- --- --- ---- 0.41 4.90 0.63 101.47 0.42 ---- ---- ---- ---- ____ 0.42 5.00 0.65 101.53 0.43 - --- ---- ----- 0.43 5.10 0.68 101.59 0.44 ---- --- ---- - -- ---- 0.44 5.20 0.71 101.66 0.45 --- ---- -- ---- 0.45 5.30 0.74 101.74 0.46 --- - - -- 0.46 5.40 0.76 101.81 0.48 ---- --- --- --- --- ---- 0.48 411 Continues on next page... Page 2 • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 5.50 0.78 101.89 0.49 --- ----- --- ---- ---- 0.49 5.60 0.80 101.97 0.50 ---- - - -- ---- --- 0.50 5.70 0.81 102.05 0.51 -- - ---- ---- ---- --- --- 0.51 5.80 0.83 102.13 0.52 -- ---- --- ---- -- ---- -- --- 0.52 5.90 0.86 102.21 0.53 ---- --- ---- --- ---- -- --- 0.53 6.00 0.89 102.30 0.54 -- -_- -- ---- --- --- 0.54 6.10 0.95 102.39 0.55 - --- ---- -- -- -- ---- 0.55 6.20 1.00 102.49 0.56 --- __- --- -- -- ---- 0.56 6.30 1.05 102.59 0.58 ---- - --- ---- - 0.58 6.40 1.07 102.71 0.59 --- -- -- --- -- ---- 0.59 6.50 1.10 102.82 0.60 --- ---- ---- --- --- ----- 0.60 6.60 1.08 102.93 0.61 --- ---- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.61 6.70 1.05 103.03 0.63 ---- - - --- ---- -- -- 0.63 6.80 1.06 103.12 0.64 - ---- ---- -- -- - ---- 0.64 6.90 1.10 103.22 0.65 - - --_- - - --- --- 0.65 7.00 1.16 103.33 0.66 ---- -- -- -- 0.66 7.10 1.23 103.44 0.67 -- --- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.67 7.20 1.32 103.57 0.68 --- ---- - ---- 0.68 7.30 1.42 103.72 0.70 ---- ---- 0.70 7.40 1.55 103.88 0.71 ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.71 7.50 1.69 104.07 0.73 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.73 7.60 2.59 104.37 0.76 ---- ----- ---- --- 0.76 • 7.70 3.78 104.87 0.80 ---- -- ---- _-- --- 0.80 7.80 4.30 105.52 0.86 0.20 1.06 7.90 4.50<< 106.22 0.91 0.41 ---- ---- ---- --- -- --- 1.31 8.00 4.46 106.91 0.96 0.53 0.16 -- --- --- ---- --- 1.66 8.10 3.79 107.50 1.00 0.62 0.24 0.04 --- --- 1.90 8.20 2.89 107.88 1.03 0.68 0.28 0.05 ---- 2.04 8.30 2.40 108.06 1.04 0.70 0.30 0.06 2.10 8.40 2.06 108.10 1.04 0.71 0.30 0.06 ---- --- ---- 2.11 « 8.50 1.81 108.05 1.04 0.70 0.30 0.06 --_ -___ -_ ---- 2.09 8.60 1.75 107.95 1.03 0.69 0.29 0.05 -- --- -- 2.06 8.70 1.74 107.87 1.03 0.67 0.28 0.05 --- ---- --- 2.03 8.80 1.65 107.78 1.02 0.66 0.27 0.05 --- ---- ---- --- 2.00 8.90 1.55 107.67 1.01 0.65 0.26 0.04 -- ---- -- 1.97 9.00 1.46 107.54 1.00 0.63 0.25 0.04 --- -- -- - 1.92 9.10 1.36 107.41 0.99 0.61 0.23 0.03 ---- ---- -- 1.87 9.20 1.27 107.28 0.99 0.59 0.22 0.02 --- --- --- ---- 1.82 9.30 1.22 107.14 0.98 0.57 0.20 0.01 ---- -- -- 1.76 9.40 1.17 107.01 0.97 0.55 0.18 ---- --- - ---- 1.70 9.50 1.13 106.89 0.96 0.53 0.16 ---- --- --- - 1.65 9.60 1.09 106.76 0.95 0.51 0.13 --- -- ---- -- 1.59 9.70 1.08 106.65 0.94 0.49 0.11 -- ---- --- --- ---- 1.54 9.80 1.08 106.55 0.93 0.47 0.08 ---- ---- --- ---- 1.48 9.90 1.07 106.47 0.93 0.46 0.04 --- 1.42 10.00 1.04 106.39 0.92 0.44 0.01 --- --- --- ---- 1.37 10.10 1.04 106.32 0.92 0.43 0.00 - - ---- 1.34 10.20 1.02 106.25 0.91 0.41 --- --- --- ---- 1.32 10.30 0.98 106.18 0.91 0.40 -- ---- --- ---- 1.30 10.40 0.95 106.11 0.90 0.38 - - ---- --- -- ---- --- 1.28 • 10.50 0.94 106.04 0.90 0.36 --- -_- --__ 1.26 Continues on next page... Page 3 Hydrograph Discharge Table • Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 10.60 0.94 105.97 0.89 0.35 - - - ---- --- -- ---- 1.24 10.70 0.94 105.91 0.89 0.33 ---- ---- -- --- -- 1.22 10.80 0.93 105.85 0.88 0.31 ---- ---- -- ---- ---- -- 1.20 10.90 0.92 105.79 0.88 0.30 --- - -- ---- --- 1.17 11.00 0.90 105.74 0.87 0.28 - - ---- ---- ---- ---- --- 1.15 11.10 0.88 105.68 0.87 0.26 ---- --- ---- --- --- ---- 1.13 11.20 0.87 105.63 0.86 0.25 --- -- 1.11 11.30 0.85 105.58 0.86 0.23 - ---- --- 1.09 11.40 0.84 105.53 0.86 0.21 --- --- --- 1.06 11.50 0.82 105.48 0.85 0.19 -- ___ ---_ 1.04 11.60 0.80 105.44 0.85 0.16 --- -- ---- 1.01 11.70 0.78 105.39 0.85 0.14 ---- --- ----- --- 0.98 11.80 0.77 105.35 0.84 0.11 ---- -- -- --- 0.95 11.90 0.76 105.32 0.84 0.08 ---- -- --- -- ---- 0.92 12.00 0.75 105.28 0.84 0.06 ---- - --- ---- --- -- 0.90 12.10 0.75 105.26 0.83 0.04 - - - --- ---- ---- 0.88 12.20 0.75 105.23 0.83 0.03 -- -- ---- 0.86 12.30 0.75 105.21 0.83 0.02 -- -- ---- ---- ---- 0.85 12.40 0.76 105.19 0.83 0.01 ---- -- --- ---- 0.84 12.50 0.77 105.17 0.83 0.01 ---- --- --- 0.84 12.60 0.76 105.16 0.83 0.00 ---- --- --- - ---- ---- 0.83 12.70 0.74 105.14 0.82 0.00 --- --- --- --- 0.83 • 12.80 0.73 105.12 0.82 0.00 -- - --- --- -- ---- 0.82 12.90 0.72 105.10 0.82 -- ---- ---- --- --- 0.82 13.00 0.72 105.08 0.82 -- - - ---- - ---- 0.82 13.10 0.73 105.06 0.82 --- ---- -- -- 0.82 13.20 0.74 105.05 0.82 ---- ---- ---- ---- --- ---- 0.82 13.30 0.73 105.03 0.82 -- ---- ---- --- - ----- 0.82 13.40 0.72 105.01 0.81 ---- --- --- ---- --- 0.81 13.50 0.71 104.99 0.81 ---- ---- -- --- ---- ---- --- 0.81 13.60 0.70 104.97 0.81 ---- - --- -- -- ---- ---- 0.81 13.70 0.69 104.95 0.81 ---- ---- -- -- ---- -- 0.81 13.80 0.69 104.92 0.81 --- ----- - ---- ---- ---- 0.81 13.90 0.68 104.90 0.80 ---- ---- ---- --- ---- -- ---- 0.80 14.00 0.68 104.87 0.80 ---- ---- - 0.80 14.10 0.68 104.85 0.80 --- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.80 14.20 0.68 104.82 0.80 ---- - - ---- ---- ---- 0.80 14.30 0.68 104.80 0.80 -- -- -- --- --- 0.80 14.40 0.68 104.77 0.79 --- - --- -- -- ---- 0.79 14.50 0.67 104.75 0.79 ---- --- ---- --- ---- 0.79 14.60 0.67 104.72 0.79 --- -- 0.79 14.70 0.67 104.70 0.79 -- -- --- ----- --- ---- 0.79 14.80 0.67 104.67 0.78 - _- ____ -_ ____ --- 0.78 14.90 0.66 104.65 0.78 -- ---- ---- 0.78 15.00 0.66 104.62 0.78 --- ---- -- ---- 0.78 15.10 0.66 104.60 0.78 --- --- 0.78 15.20 0.65 104.57 0.78 ---- 0.78 15.30 0.65 104.55 0.77 --- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.77 15.40 0.65 104.52 0.77 --- ----- ---- --- ---- --- ---- 0.77 15.50 0.65 104.50 0.77 ---- -- -- ---- ---- --- --- 0.77 15.60 0.64 104.47 0.77 - ---- --- -- --- --- 0.77 • Continues on next page... Page 4 • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 15.70 0.64 104.44 0.76 ---- ---- -- - ---- --- --- 0.76 15.80 0.64 104.42 0.76 --- ---- --- ---- -- ----- --- 0.76 15.90 0.63 104.39 0.76 ---- ---- -- ---- 0.76 16.00 0.63 104.37 0.76 --- ---- - ---- 0.76 16.10 0.63 104.34 0.76 ---- ---- -- ---- 0.76 16.20 0.62 104.31 0.75 ---- 0.75 16.30 0.62 104.29 0.75 - -- - ---- 0.75 16.40 0.62 104.26 0.75 ---- ---- --- ---- ---- 0.75 16.50 0.62 104.23 0.75 --- ____ ___ ____ 0.75 16.60 0.61 104.20 0.74 --- - - - 0.74 16.70 0.61 104.18 0.74 --- --- -- ---- -- -- --- 0.74 16.80 0.61 104.15 0.74 ---- -- ---- ---_ -_ ___- 0.74 16.90 0.60 104.12 0.74 ---- - - -- --- -- ---- 0.74 17.00 0.60 104.09 0.73 --- ---- --- -- -- --- --- 0.73 17.10 0.60 104.06 0.73 ---- --- -- -- ---- 0.73 17.20 0.59 104.04 0.73 ----- --- ---- - --- 0.73 17.30 0.59 104.01 0.72 - --- ---- -- --- 0.72 17.40 0.59 103.98 0.72 -- ---- -- --- ----- --- 0.72 17.50 0.59 103.95 0.72 --- --- - -- -- -- -- 0.72 17.60 0.58 103.92 0.72 ---- ---- -- ---- --- -- ---- 0.72 17.70 0.58 103.90 0.71 --- -- --- -- ----- --- -- 0.71 17.80 0.58 103.87 0.71 ---- - - -- -- ---- 0.71 • 17.90 0.57 103.84 0.71 - ---- ---- --- --- ---- --- 0.71 18.00 0.57 103.81 0.71 ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.71 18.10 0.57 103.78 0.70 -- --- ---- --- --- 0.70 18.20 0.56 103.75 0.70 -- --_ ____ ____ 0.70 18.30 0.56 103.72 0.70 -- -- - -- ---- ---- 0.70 18.40 0.56 103.69 0.69 -- - - - ---- ---- 0.69 18.50 0.56 103.66 0.69 --- --- -- ---- --- --- 0.69 18.60 0.55 103.63 0.69 - -- - - -- ----- ---- -- 0.69 18.70 0.55 103.61 0.69 --- --- ---- --- -- --- ---- 0.69 18.80 0.55 103.58 0.68 - ---- --- --- ---- ----- 0.68 18.90 0.54 103.55 0.68 --- -- - --- -- ---- 0.68 19.00 0.54 103.52 0.68 ---- --- --- 0.68 19.10 0.54 103.49 0.67 _-_ ____ ____ - ____ 0.67 19.20 0.53 103.46 0.67 - ---- --- --- 0.67 19.30 0.53 103.43 0.67 --- -- -- ---- --- - --- 0.67 19.40 0.53 103.40 0.66 ---- --- ----- -- --- ---- 0.66 19.50 0.52 103.37 0.66 -__ _- -_ _-_ __- ___ -- 0.66 19.60 0.52 103.34 0.66 -- ---- -- -- --- 0.66 19.70 0.52 103.31 0.66 --- --- -- ---- ---- 0.66 19.80 0.52 103.28 0.65 ---- -- --- ---- --- 0.65 19.90 0.51 103.25 0.65 -- ---- ---- -- ---- --- 0.65 20.00 0.51 103.22 0.65 -- ---- ----- --- --- 0.65 20.10 0.51 103.19 0.64 -_-- ____ ____ ____ -__ ____ 0.64 20.20 0.50 103.16 0.64 ---- --- --- --- 0.64 20.30 0.50 103.13 0.64 -- ---- ---- ---- - -- 0.64 20.40 0.50 103.10 0.63 20.50 0.49 103.07 0.63 -- -- ---- -- - ---- 0.63 20.60 0.49 103.04 0.63 -- -- --- --- -- - 0.63 • 20.70 0.49 103.01 0.62 --- --- -- -- -- -- -- 0.62 Continues on next page... Page 5 Hydrograph Discharge Table • Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 20.80 0.49 102.98 0.62 ---- ---- ---- ----- 0.62 20.90 0.48 102.95 0.62 ---- --- --- ---- 0.62 21.00 0.48 102.91 0.61 ---- ---- ---- 0.61 21.10 0.48 102.88 0.61 ---- ---- --- ---- 0.61 21.20 0.47 102.85 0.61 --- --- -- --- ---- 0.61 21.30 0.47 102.82 0.60 --- -- - ---- - - -- 0.60 21.40 0.47 102.79 0.60 --- ---- --- ---- -- --- 0.60 21.50 0.46 102.76 0.60 -- --- ---- 0.60 21.60 0.46 102.73 0.59 ---- --- --- 0.59 21.70 0.46 102.70 0.59 ---- --- --- 0.59 21.80 0.45 102.67 0.59 --- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.59 21.90 0.45 102.64 0.58 ---- ---- -- 0.58 22.00 0.45 102.61 0.58 ----- ---- -- ---- -- --- -- 0.58 22.10 0.45 102.58 0.57 --- -- --- ---- ----- ---- 0.57 22.20 0.44 102.55 0.57 - --- ---- -- -- ---- -- 0.57 22.30 0.44 102.52 0.57 ---- --- --- -- - 0.57 22.40 0.44 102.49 0.56 -- ---- -- ---- --- --- ---- 0.56 22.50 0.43 102.46 0.56 - --- --- -- ---- ---- -- 0.56 22.60 0.43 102.43 0.56 --- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- 0.56 22.70 0.43 102.40 0.55 ---- --- -- -- 0.55 22.80 0.42 102.37 0.55 --- --- -- - -- ----- 0.55 22.90 0.42 102.34 0.55 ---- -- -- -- -- -- ---- 0.55 23.00 0.42 102.31 0.54 -- - ---- ---- 0.54 • 23.10 0.41 102.28 0.54 - --- -- ---- ---- ---- 0.54 23.20 0.41 102.24 0.53 --- --- -- --- ---- -- 0.53 23.30 0.41 102.21 0.53 --- --- --- ---- ---- 0.53 23.40 0.41 102.18 0.53 --- -- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.53 23.50 0.40 102.15 0.52 ---- -- -- ---- 0.52 23.60 0.40 102.12 0.52 ---- ---- --- ---- ---- -- ---- 0.52 23.70 0.40 102.09 0.51 ---- ---- - 0.51 23.80 0.39 102.06 0.51 ---- ---- ____ ____ 0.51 23.90 0.39 102.03 0.51 ---- ---- ---- 0.51 24.00 0.39 102.00 0.50 - --- ---- ---- ---- 0.50 24.10 0.00 101.93 0.49 - --- ---- ---- ---- --- 0.49 24.20 0.00 101.80 0.47 - ---- ---- ---- -- ---- --- 0.47 24.30 0.00 101.66 0.45 ---- ---- ----- --- ---- --- 0.45 24.40 0.00 101.54 0.43 -- ---- ---- - ---- ---- 0.43 24.50 0.00 101.42 0.41 -- --- 0.41 24.60 0.00 101.28 0.39 ---- - ----- ---- --- -- ---- 0.39 24.70 0.00 101.15 0.37 --- - - - ---- -- 0.37 24.80 0.00 101.03 0.35 --- --- ---- -- --- - 0.35 24.90 0.00 100.92 0.32 _- -__ -_ _-_ _- ___ 0.32 25.00 0.00 100.77 0.29 --- ---- ---- - ----- 0,29 25.10 0.00 100.65 0.26 ---- -- -- ---- - --- ---- 0.26 25.20 0.00 100.54 0.23 --- ---- - --- 0.23 25.30 0.00 100.39 0.18 --- -- - - - - ---- 0.18 25.40 0.00 100.21 0.09 ---- ---- - -- - ---- ---- 0.09 25.50 0.00 100.13 0.04 --- -- -- ----- ---- 0.04 ...End • Hydrograph Report Pagel • Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.00 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 2 Reservoir name = preliminary pond Max. Elevation = 0.00 ft Max. Storage = 0 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume=0 cuft ...End • • Appendix C — Stage Storage, Discharge Tables, • and Detention Calculations Reservoir Report • Reservoir Report Page 1 • Reservoir No. 1 - preliminary pond Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Pond Data d/ Pipe diameter = 9.00 ft Pipe length = 384ft Pipe slope = 0.10 % Invert elev. = 100.00 ft Stage/Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sqft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cuft) 0.00 100.00 00 0 0 0.47 100.47 00 125 125 0.94 100.94 00 366 491 1.41 101.41 00 502 993 1.88 101.88 00 594 1,586 2.35 102.35 00 664 2,250 2.82 102.82 00 716 2,966 3.28 103.28 00 753 3,719 3.75 103.75 00 782 4,501 4.22 104.22 00 800 5,301 4.69 104.69 00 810 6,111 5.16 105.16 00 807 6,919 5.63 105.63 00 800 7,718 6.10 106.10 00 782 8,500 6.57 106 57 00 756 9,256 . 7.04 107.04 00 713 9,969 7.51 107.51 00 663 10,632 7.98 107.98 00 594 11,227 8.45 108.45 00 501 11,728 //^ 8.91 108.91 00 365 12,093 L % 9.38 109.38 00 124 12,217 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] 3.14 ] [B] [C] [D] • Rise in = 3.8 4.0 3.0 1.5 Crest Len ft = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span in = 3.8 4.0 3.0 1.5 Crest El.ft = 108.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 1 1 1 1 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert El.ft = 100.00 105.12 106.32 107.05 Weir Type = Riser - Length ft = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope% = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N-Value = .013 .013 .013 .013 Orif.Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Multi-Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration Rate = 0.00 in/hr/sqft Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 ft Note:All outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage I Storage I Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.00 0 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - - -- -- 0.00 0.47 125 100.47 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - - -- --- 0.21 0.94 491 100.94 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- --- -- -- 0.33 1.41 993 101.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- -- -- --- 0.41 1.88 1,586 101.88 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- -- -- -- --- 0.48 2.35 2,250 102.35 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- --- - --- 0.55 2.82 2,966 102.82 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- -- -- - --- 0.60 3.28 3,719 103.28 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - -- - 0.65 3.75 4,501 103.75 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - --- - -- 0.70 4.22 5,301 104.22 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- --- -- -- - 0.74 4.69 6,111 104 69 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - -- --- 0.79 5.16 6,919 105.16 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - -- - --- 0.83 5.63 7,718 105.63 0.86 0.25 0.00 0.00 -- -- - --- --- 1.11 6.10 8,500 106.10 0.90 0.38 0 00 0.00 --- - -- -- -.- 1.28 6.57 9,256 106.57 0.94 0.48 0.08 0.00 -- - -- - - 1.49 7.04 9,969 107.04 0.97 0.56 0.18 0.00 - - - - -- 1.71 7.51 10,632 107.51 1.00 0.63 0.24 0.04 - - - - - 1.91 • 7.98 11,227 107.98 1.03 0.69 0.29 0.05 - - - - - 2.07 - 8.45 11,728 108.45 1.06 0.75 0.33 0.07 2.21 8.91 12,093 108.91 1.09 0.80 0.37 0.06 - - - - - - -- - 2.34 9.38 12,217 109.38 1.12 0.85 0.41 0.09 - - - - - 2.47 Appendix D — Water Quality Calculations • 1111 0 • Appendix E — Soils Data 0 0 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON — SHEET NUMBER 44 654 ,= w-^-aa) • • • 122 : y, SOIL SURVEY WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON 1`L3 1;I TABLE 13.—Soil and water features—Continued ,k Soil name and Hydro- Flooding - _ f -- High water table Bedrock mapsymbol Logic �q: -- ____ 1. Frequency Duration Monthsoup Depth Kind Mentha Depth Hardness z 3w 1 Rhckitat: 4 FY *. ! -----_ 40-50 Hard. I None ., X6,0 ___---___--__—_----_ Rnappa: 26 ___—_--_—_---- B None _ Labish: ',i*'' . __ Dec-Apr -- -- >60 ---______ 27 D Frequent----- -- Very lone----------- Deo-Apr----- ..£'�. 0.1.0 Perched--------- ----_—_ Laurelwood: i 28,28C,28D,28E,29E,29F B None ---_________—_ ___ �:T� >6.0 - ---- McBee: 30 ----- B Frequent___ Brief '• 2.0-8.0 A t Nav-Apr .-'--------- >60 --------- __ Nov.May---------- •n' PPSLBD ----- i ---------- Melbourne: ----- 319,31C,3ID,31E.3IF_ B Noce >6.0 _— ----_— --- ----- >60 Melby: 400 RiPpabla 32C,32D,32E,33E,33F,334__--- C None -^ >6.0 —_------------------_----- Olyic: 34C,34D,34E,35E,35E,356 B None ", —__—__—_____—_--_ —__--_— 40-60 Hard. , Pervi,3 ".1;ry" >60 Rippable. 36C,36D,36E,36F—__ C None Qv0 37A,7A.37 379 37 >80 ------ ,37C." D C 2.04.0 Perched-- ------- Deo-Apr —_ Saum: 388,38C,38D,38E,313E_ C None -- _—______—___—__—_---__--_ 4040 Hard. Tolke: 39E, 39F ___—______—_—_—_ B None ---- ,:, >6.0 -------"----- >60 Udlduvents: ---------- ---- B -- Nov-A r ..K, o-&0 Apparent _ Nov-Apr_-_-- >60 '----- Frequent---------- Very brief P -- ----- ----- Verboort: ", >60 42 ----------_,--- D Frequent_—_—_—_ Brief Dee-Apr _— 0-2.0 Perched__—, ---- Dec-Apr --_— P Wapato: ---C3 Fre9vent_--_—_ Brief --- Dec-Apr — ;i.. 0-1.0 Apparent DecApr__---- >60 — —. Willamette: ----- .� �— _ �_—____— >60 94A,448.44C,44D_--_—---, B None -----_-- ---- Woodburn: 45A,458,45C,45D—____—____— .. -� C / None ---------- -1 2.0-3.0 Perched---------^ Dec-Apr >� Xerochrepts: '46F: %eroehrepts part B N •..:'. __ one ----------- --..'•.; 3.0-4.0 Perched_—�_ _ Dec-Apr----___-- >� --' Hsploaerolls part —__----- --_ -__------ C None 8.0-4.0 Perched------------- Dec-Mar ----- >60 _----- --------------------- ----- '472: Xerochrepts part___--___ D None '" >6.0 ------------- --___------------ 0-16 Hard. -- Rock outcrop part. --------_—_- 'This mapping unit is made up of two or more dominant kinds of soil.See mapping unit description for the composition and behavior of the whole mapping wait. • `r:. When one considers data shown immediately below (imaged copied from the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington—Table 2.3): Cover type and hydrologic condition. A B C - D Curve Numbers for Pre-Development Conditions Pasture,grassland,or range-continuous forage for grazing: Fair condition(ground cover 50%to 75%and not heavily grazed). 49 69 79 34 Good condition(_wound cover>75%and lightly or only occasionally grazed) 39 61 74 80 Woods: Fair(Woods are grazed but not burned,and some forest litter covers the soil). 36 60 73 79 Good(Woods are protected from Qrazinz.and litter and brush aderEtately cover the soil). 30 55 70 77 Curve Numbers for Post-Development Conditions Open space(lawns,parks,golf courses,cemeteries,landscaping,etc.)1 Fair condition(grass cover on 50%- 75%of the area). 77 85 90 92 Good condition(grass cover on>75%of the area) 63 80 86 90 Impervious areas: Open water bodies: lakes,wetlands,ponds etc. 100 100 100 100 Paved parking lots,roofs=,driveways.etc. (excluding right-of-way) 98 98 98 98 Porous Pavers'and Permeable Interlocking Concrete(assumed as 85%impervious and 15%lawn) Fair lawn condition(weighted average CNs). 95 96 97 97 Good lawn condition(weighted average CNs). 94 95 96 97 Paved Gravel(including right-of-way) 98 98 98 98 76 85 89 911 Dirt(including right-of-way) 72 82 87 89 Pasture,grassland,or range-coutiuttotts forage for grazing: Poor condition(ground cover<50%or heavily grazed with no mulch). Fair condition(ground cover 50%to 75%`and not heavily68 79 86 89 Good condition(ground cover>75%and lightly or only occasionally grazed) 49 69 79 S4 39 61 74 SO Woods: Poor(Forest litter,small trees.and brush are destroyed by heavy grazing or regular burning). 45 66 77 83 Fair(Woods are grazed but not burned,and some forest litter covers the soil). 36 60 73 79 Good(Woods are protected from grazing,and litter and brush adequately cover the soil), 30 55 70 77 • • • O SENN PARK TRAILHEAD LAND USE REVIEW SEPTEMBER 2013 M 113 PREPARED BY:MIG,INC. PROJECT NO: 01887 CONTACTS OWNER SURVEYOR & ENGINEERING CITY OF TIGARD CESNW,INC. DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS 13190 SW 68TH PARKWAY,SUITE 150 STEVE MARTIN TIGARD,OR 97223 PARKS&FACILITIES MANAGER STEVE@TIGARD-OR GOV ARBORIST MORGAN HOLLEN&ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 3 MONROE PARKWAY,SUITE P 220 MOORE,IACOFANO,GOLTSMAN,INC LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 815 SW SECOND AVENUE,SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97204 0 T(503)297-1005 F(503)297-3195 RACHEL EDMONDS PROJECT MANAGER RACHELE@MIGCOM COM VICINITY MAPS SITE ADDRESS: INTERSECTION OF SW 74TH AVENUE AND SW RED CEDAR WAY,TIGARD,OR 97223 E!) VICINITY MAP Senn Put Ttmilvae . ; :;1:: ;`;; -"..." ' ;.*r. !NS,-, CREEK ESTATEI , ..__:,,N•"^s1/4.,. ; . ' ; `,,i ; •"rt, ..„1"14k.:"A;;.4 . '=••:2....;;;:r., —Mt—, i 1 , ;.; ;.., , ;1 ..,k• ;44.17.x..---'^';‘.7.—.." i .. 1 VA • - . mn A so, • zu.,./71.. • , •• _ . . M.-F.if- C .,) .• '-'• ' : , ',',. ' ' '--' 1•.--Mc:f--71,,, : '-.'_".',f.!:- , - ........, ) . ....., 7 i _....- ""' '‘'' ii.t.•:,"-•'n4'.-..r. -----.------, • • - ...'"-ii-; i•t-kt,•I J. 2. 2 .2. .2., r. - - ,---.,-,- J. -:. 0 It',-.7,-.4,-• - ! , I . --,0.,....tr?..,-,,,,—• 1-,,,r L_______ ,,,, NMI , L . • A- ,,,,-.. ..,. :, , ..,,, , st •g* 1 N^ i ^.... 0.4. tt- ',..4 •0 • s.........:... ".1.MSOW A ..... . — ''''' 4 si:MIM . .---• ;,..,-. -a L."3.. -3..... ...'" f ,---).. -, ; • : - ; . .1,...,,..„..,4 _...... . . — q r ,_ II. .. 0 .-...,-. IN . mut . 4. ay... pooc.A//olgeal gblealle pwort,s.pin*0..•WO 01110401.01,0p vt,....74)5 273 MAK Arliwi Fr aprai 4 a.. SIefOlgiIN...1 Sr' am reaty Olani•Oons a Vow, 'Areas,,IsAmsam comow war A home-•,*...^M(arm rev A.Matso -"Are AA^cra.M Om r^ArArvior.c.4'1 Wpm AA Acgs Alms NI Ben**and Sri•SPIR=WV.4 l REGISTERED 1 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEY() Fr �GON • ANTHONY R.WFLLER 2649 RENEWS 6/30114 r SRI 11103 1 otai l� RM.2L99' ,�IE(NIB-.195.2 IE(Sy'1195.. ; I 14- l( W 2.,:c 14-- r_ _ g" - 6,:), LI w • _ ..___ _ , . • RDI-31573' (If '' E��yy/ x tE(N112•.201.3r ® I li 11t � � o - ,4„1 ---r\ rcIS)IY-202.1r 3 _ 3 I s\ 1�5}l l U �f • \ \\ v\..\.,,,,,..\\\::::\.:4.. V� 11v\ \ " Z In :air Ln \ nEnt \\ ° z 3 z LEGEND �, i N— I-- — \ \ �411 )\ �� z y 5 :ii ' L • 0 CRTOYBASIN lI _pt-- •1\ � t -2o3.sL m a 0 -WATER VALVE VVVII N D - 'I{ 4%�� 3 ,a 2. ® •WATER PIETEL I I < R . V `' , ® -SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 1.110-4-1-5-- ` *1B7 \,,\`-` 0 •STORM DRAIN MAIWOLE I ^ 1E4. T \ .:L1 y • CLEAN OUT I ?khT �IRRIGATION CONTROLALVE i -- LTRI[YO 11L�5GAS SALVE IGAS METED .I ri. _MAu 60X -T; ,��I I1 N 0.15ER3. j/TELEPHONE RISER - 7 SXIW4 JUNCTION BOx8 -exTluc �� V�� 1JV tlt�"..+� `'h"r � �„' V11,41llJlE�� c. `i ,/® ELECTRIC 1UNCTION BOX II i 0 w ' ` \ -�•\`• -`\ / �J J F GUY AN[1KM Vim, x .rte J 1L.,4.4 L` •Rj• lac• /l�j_-__ .i •gr -DDNFIRE HYDRANT RIM.227.M' O ' t OJI (, ` \ "'ME\�` ` .. \' O� ,\\, 11 131.11/1' .y t 0624.-- -N,'• r 'r. i i`.0. --- PROPERTY UNE CB.1201 I__ - '1" EASEMENT UNE RIM.226.61 � I Sft�7.7^......"-...-^ \-^ 4r I/�, 4:-. / \ \\^'\4y�{ /�\ \ �-' r -_.ar EASEMENT OF FLOW \ \ets�I p4,--r-v5 V -F -t .UNE CONTINUES 7O UNKNOWN LOGTION ` \ '� _ .10•;!. 1 i ,� ` • SW RED CEDAR WAY • cP-- I. ` / ��• �} E- •UN06TGRDUND ELECTRIC LITE ~Z./ 55 :j --- ../ DM\I3.�1900`�a_t$6�j\ •`'� Q♦ ti/ \\tll //� \+2. \`� ,\�` -ST- -UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN LINE _ DMH 11201 F' • R1M.2�6..222� \ \ aT♦ \, / O 1 �� 1. \ • �,\i 1 -55- .UNDERGROUND SATRAPY SEWER UNE RIM. YI3'._ - - 'ERN)CC-0,1(C 12U �y ' ,•s' 1 .\` Q\ —— 22 ,.I�P.'�— J G I Q�1I �3T.,3„� \-3. -A '"/ .4-,• X64 \1V -T- UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE 2 ✓ �E(wAl2-PYtal�a2, ��" ,� f�L\\''"c/�/�! ”" 5 -:\;.:::' .:. \!$\ -TVA UNDERGROVND CABLE TV UNE �` 6 �\~�1T. \ y `♦."/ .\-� L`I♦ /T(),,l\ --Pi- UNDERGROUND WATER LINE ♦ / I "':'-,` �\ 4 ,t"/f///--•\''--1,C S s,\ 1}Y��\\ -G- UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS UNE - tom'..� REIT EEASH I \,,,,T.? ([��/,`(� ; i \l Y/ SOH- OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE RIM]226.1. J14� 5WN 7:-.----7.......7.'",,,,,-•••••T, \ '" +(�{,-T-T-1�\=1i'I -.�t�11l -, a '\ -p- FENCE UNE ONN P1201 x / � 1•t �� uP» >r 1 � -�' '-^�\ A\ SMN -SATRAPY SEWER f1A1•tOIE 77 t- i:T ' _ i ' .11/'111\ //% RISER\. .7'"41.-�, -CONCRETE CS•MS --�I ne ,�Y_' A.—_�i//�T I . \\V�t •r_4--++..15, ,sj2� \,\•Y‘'\'\ J''1�;o;\ 43 AREA WITH SLOPE EXCEEDING 2554 f f WN E„HA.. RISS•• •` • •\ \ .y.f\., // 0210\146\ \`- \ I \\ r' 1u.«' -•NI i DRIVEWAY - ( I /� tESRrf%.�. ,..,,,•••••-,,, 2!+'T ' ssewlst iii \ \ \ 7„, 'I'h`a�'` a ".w' DECIDUOUS TREE(DIRT WITH TAG NUMBED -- -` • I / \� \ FOR � M \ rc . \_ `NAI; iii l yr ll,\\ \ �$ 0 EVERGREEN TREE(ETR7 WITH LAG...TER �- 22yyy��//��'''''tt�. _ ` Z IL J1 N \ ; \ l --_ .. O ss r r N 0 to . z U_ A O U = Oa i7 a NOTES Z Ice 1 TIE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED DN THE PLAT OF ASH CREEK ESTATES AND FOUNO MONUMENTS CI)2.THIS SURVEY MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE UNDERGROUND UNITIES SHOWN AHE ALL THE - O UTILE TES IN THE AREA THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE RASED ON LOCATE PANT IAAIN9120 61 THE FIELD UTLITES SHOWN MAY NOT RE IN THE EXACT LOCATION AS NOTED ON FHS SURVEY.BUT ARE " 3 m X 0- LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM PANT MARKINGS ON THE GROUND 311 W 0 I SUBJECT PROPERTY LES WITHIN AN UFSHAOEO FERN FLOOD ZONE TT.DEEMED AS UVUAAS DETERMINED + 3 ',", u UR TO BE OUTSIDE TIE D 2%AAL CHANCE FLOODPLNN'AS NOTED ON FEMA FLOOD RLSLRNNCE RATE MAP NUMBER 11021606110.EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 16.2116 SHEET • VERTICAL DATUM I 1 ELEVATIONS,MITE ESTARLSHED BY GPS OBSERVATION DURING IRE SMH I I I95 OREGON REAL TBE GEODETIC NETWORK ON NAD EO 120111 EPOCH 201000 IJ RN.265.03' AND GEOID MODEL 12 NIA IB-.2M.1. 1 INCH-20 FEET OF IMS-010)11.-24862' IE(W H.-2.9.15' 20 10 0 20 VI { I / ail J SITE PLAN LEGEND M ' L.71 1 ( TREE PROTECTION NOTES: '3t, W! A r,:w4.s Awl£WR re on awl of 1E+.'°Aalm JIM/OIESTR"ilw smut 6wfTOi'a140e FM Tic�0.0'r MIY'.4r ei rr ++w*r.- I — -- En OMIT OF WORK N 1 3 111111E FOR p=N6►G.G7Y61+G et lanU.010R DF la PAPE 7101 0136..115 PORP.LL KM DM n.a 13)DEWS 3 x-T FF i♦'.iw..1 T 1E : PEE ! I K • P TFL it h15141E1 Ars to Me WEND oESnEEMPCE.w1C.=1E10a Ml1�7ea1c ILL K11A. — PROPERTY UNE I 1` Iii______ __. 1 vac MIEle1L5 RCS 40 reDSF1.N 01911[7 Me 4:11111"OM ME;AMID MIP OF MF TAH OESeAMB!ro rEwlk et-R. +7 NUT ME T:: Fowl. • EauW1E3X,*VOW SCUMS.Slate MIMIC Waft ARD S�IPOSOS.7AFw1 CO110EIE e1eell Ara IOCATIG N_LS EASEMENT LINE tOWNER l 0 A1TYo11E•fS N TAW 7u6G COMMUC117A-PO RRSOM peLL MAW Mfr*Ayr 10 Me TEE OF54MAIa Fa PIEsemz e. {�,`4 1 J Ex EXISTING TRANSFORMER City of ngard ! \\\\` ////// E XECM 3011EA MOW 10 Me aDIU10 ElSruT002 9!nE r17rC�t Public woha Department I \� / ' S4PU ERECT NO W M 1fJaU FISSE Ti oo Pmalas COCK ALM he OM"mu MID GaFtERlr ss. ee SI Paten 4110 a m 1I7ECOM MO lE 8777 SW Burnham Street 1 ., II !n e 73 ``. •-...- .._ ants x hal a A10.1.14[1'51 DOM 11E:O'a7VCE'o of s MGT 1YLL YEW.56am TA E/aF Pool LLL Wit POSES SNYI b1 EEE PEKES Prnf5 hoe EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE Tigard,OR 97223 I -. a FTET 0.4PYT1 ,'I ill — ' 1 .r E YEaY1F9 10 72461 am Yawl 10 A DEM OF a ars!Si,6)*Inn V AR4 PLnOaD A%MIR MEWL.140 111E AOOE DX OF a WEE w IMP 70EXISTING I o 1302 r Rena 4LCIS.- MICE 9•In'"1015111E X BE REMOVED TO G • I . -- 1 peel mown EXAM%a C01PAL'lra OF EAR171 0A 5546 a01E711R11:riIGFK AC'NIES 1511 11E 1Rg NIaEC1121 IIIE DRIV;y AY r I I • \ 4 MP E ROAMED 10 1.1011E Rom aM.CE er QCA1oo.Cf A iso;o FEET OUP MICK Al IE ala T TME sa 9cErna 119E 10 OIEN4+TAII he KOS T O OCHAIN LINK TREE CONSULTANTS Tis E ,, PROTECTION FENCE (E) I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE /,l,, � 11Mr E mew)19 M1E:DYIO M MOOD IR O OM PTE t*REEL M�eog A ego 1AWrt PAa ohlaerF 91 Wl7Ma FC11/0 Yn 9E taluPEG 10 `f uTIUTf POLE Maore lacotano GOMSman.Inc. ' ` Jjl ''�\ e'ON 111751 a"ni7OLT°DSI TEem e`sill%RTC T�UYt ❑ CATCH BASIN815 SW 2nd Ave,Suite 200 ``� ! 11 6 9WU NANILM IMETIES AAOIQIa FEICK N ALICE Jel nE P40+ECT A itict MC 311 MOST.KAIICOZES MIR EIOML 0 WATER VALVEPorllond,OR 97204 \\ 11E Altl MAK floc pr elAOSClifL OOM:.1E ME RICFEC7oA ZOE DAISEX1'On is III MOIL.OF a RIIiIM sWu.E ACC71/l6EE AFM Lae YCie$Xr A ® WATER METER SURVEYOR SSti1 n WC AM SE NMF w19Y&S Ill CORPMEf NE+1[RAeEKERS TO 011E10 1E PES�P NC 3I 1 AWT WNW ton fR7Y TWeui ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CESNW,Inc. I! 13190 SW 68th Pkwy,Suite 150 1 A > `� r x aea'Wu NIX E EU'L O,r cam NM 11[IQ A1aF[11024.0110 110T 1E maw McJitFS MT10g1I171 II>EOECT AR1pe5T Y1r Aug 7C01AFi ® STORM DRAIN MANHOLE Tigard,OR 97223 7 uP N 2E Itlf Cr TIFMG 7 ntc viers fah Of NM IENT Sas(Ra OAF;TO nE YIMM SPIN 01EGREW TD,+WRI OI,Y WO%a IMIISGAT7L HNA.F n 2 UNE CONT. TO UNKNOWN LDCATIDN! 11110AL I T RPM 14E 9Ava.OF lE AEE AEXe41 o01Ca Yp E a®JPG1 10 OFAIE IE WEE'S SJaMLARBORIST t^i'- - c F 1E GeOt 141106.n A 91aTMa TREE A AAm WI riww f 37117 5124104 a 007 wr0 IE PEE�AOIE'71a EOE 1 Slew E reerveau SDIdRG 10 — E— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNE Morgan Helen&Asocates 1 it P.D,gFFSIFFbr�TKw>F liE Fools —ST— UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN UNE 3 Monroe Pkwy,Suite P 220 � 1 I\ T ' rC UNDERGROUND SAN TARP SEWER UNE Lake Oswego.OR 97035 ! I s IAF \ H w MEIMo,S A:FasFas ter c e6cksinxMRM 6.i 171E PR,taFbn WE lFMFr TEE 10 BE'E'er AFb:T 1m tRPbMllTiar�F r E P'ADEfP uM0c6T 6.E —ss— ilrr�_ \ ow=ASF Yat 9EOJIE S N2 CpdFgUC1oN 1Eif10D5 MOMR E Y+Be104 00ACa 10 14171E lE EARS AAr'L YC 713 nMIZE 1FE PDIElF1K FOR iDOI K ow=twice 1FEYD6 SAKE —T— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE L —W— UNDERGROUND WATER UNE i I TO TIC 31611111 EYEST PROM Alto TEF[IES AWL I LXRED IXRA0E 3'TE TRE 46IC1T LOE 3r sus 10 TE AMC if ARMAU 1AtM WE AWE f F (n \III i �� IN S E IO1Rg10,MEA lit 70015 OF VIES 10 1 T51%540 F THE PROW WORST Zama 041161(0 a PADS IYM(LV Rmucr 6.E cwwEES EEE —TV— UNDERGROUND CABLE TV LINE $EN N PARK I t ; 0 1E WEB 51,4MrRl I I � � —�,— UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS LINE a J-4 1 G --�o._�+ B 7 1 maim.Ram a1gLTwL mac es 1Mil NIL le JSII 10 MX 311/GE M TREES OE970a FOR elESOM10w — PROPERTY UNE TRAI LH EAD # 4. AOCrla4t REWRIDEFa's NE PR'..ECI IMO re AWtwE 10707+01,111E*E500.00fa 11.09415 INCH M1E COmSiBn Lf4 111E WE 0E7.She 7110114.5. EASEMENT LINE f I G O SW 74th Avenue l I �' -^ \ // Tigard,OR 97723 I �' F/1 O # /i �E i eat*Sows UA0UIete x II ' \\1 11► 7 j l/ \ 1 1 1 I I/ 1..EU Y C11 a aIYRB. P104.1 MI 1 ` S 0-C.YA% ! _� a 3'/2.Ole MK a /IMAM ATTAOG TO PFS 1 �^ 1 far#624.F e 1001.4 e l elm Nhrs a. 4 p P NITER �`�\\ //� 01328 \\�\ 1 //, .,_ ., i I It r) ` \ , %� ` �/ 4Ill rKwuEwF r x.MFffn ,.; 1 1 � ,.. �' 0 79 �`\� % �� \\11't i��'' j 1/,f/ ! I.6......l III , �__ �� `.� � � // REVISIONS DATE LINER SIDEWAIX ` . \� \ I 1 'r'�' I `�i\ �! ��\0621 -'2 ~� u I I l// 1 lc../ ` — - t - w it wsrs r1s1 E 1 I t: OP v 1 ) „ T1II:\ i .\ ,I \`% ��s�„♦ ;'.�% f //� /l :1 i I r�// �~ ! O MS WA 13 HE 321- ENA OF POST I i 4 ��/ I'` ` \1,' A�Sr ° \�� / WM 1 Icct Foca Ft*TR¢wlrn¢roR ava.oe Z—i ,m„CciC ^T ?8 � ��..r - w�� •4� �JI/`�4II` �". z 02400efit 03 s .rt4.0 t tswce 111 liE m,0 a III namCeiStlualch STAMP C`'JI 4,858 SF _ E` O 3 �j(�' �j�'/'�� T,��\ 1 97PewLS a PpE1.Tnl MEA 5110240 E ALSO r6 nA1Lm Ar 7E uEOm F� _.. ` �Ydo► PgpR 1p eu+Lilc oF.11CaSW R I I // _ \ Q�{g fei� . =-I` 'P'E1 -- 1. ATO aRrx Rom mI1 oo R7 oir7aE a shd 1.4111E rOo1s wet I I TAXLDT; 1ST '.1:'SOD �, - N\ / 1".01' ' 1 Dna Sew)EE Yw0060 nocuonn WIR7RILWA CEDAWAY { . 111" \\N\ �� = F�� i, 'tJ�--� \ T eDi I \ �'i j /r-..ji,� {c:, \ \ (4ETAL TREE PROTECTION FENCE • _411./.2..../ '/ `/// / �\ Ate•-' •1 �'Al �\\� / . MIG TREE PROTECTION NOTES DATE LOT 2 I I 1 1 \ /110, - /\ _ // SEPTEMBER 20.2013 / 1. THIS PLAN IS BASED ON A SURVEY BY If '\4' i + \_w e 0 1 12 2.1 111 / t' { itI` AA\�\ CESNw, INC. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL $UBM(RAl SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING •41111111 J lJT1LiTIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. r �� //`' r\�% :-..------_,.. ... �\\,x711}1+/, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, NOTIFY LAND USE REVIEW \� �+'\\\ G\,�� {+ \\�� /LLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION \ \. - 1 /!/ -- __ _ - ! i{ \\ �� SURVEY-REIATED DISCREPANCIES f \ o //�e- i' \ F i 1 �' IDENTIFIED ON SiTE. DRAWN B RE a a �� ---h D.� 0 659 I \I '� i' ` CHECKED 8Y: iH I ., --- MIG NO.: 0188700- , i :..S„ 7� �\ ��=�� !� �221 ��lf , \\��1 e ......_ Al ' Jy1ti 14fy�fs �/ /�, /'Jn111``, y/1 11��1��1 �� /1Ii \\ \ \\�� t \ coNsuLl.No.: 1cxr j ( 1 \� i� SCALE--- -- 7 4_, _f___,_;; / 134 _ - 1210 \ / � ;- III - - r- > �u ti., _ / ` 0 642 J I fir--: / -�-i i a a zit 01 �� tiM1T Of WORK .� 1 M �� ` SHEET IITLE ( ¢ J �� f ////'J,llj(`\\\\�\ MORGAN HOLEN, AIFtSF THAT THISTTREEPRESERVAtION NAY i .� ,� to / N. PREE PRESERVATION AND LAN MEETS ALL OF THE REMOUIVREMAL SITE I E &REMOVAL SITE PLAN r1 � \� IN SECTION 10, PART 1, OF THE CITY / ///1 ( , 1 I \\�� OF TpIyGwARO{(U(��R�BA�N FORESTRY MANUAL. SHEEP NO. I / / IIED MORGAN HOLES I -1--- - `'-�_I+ �.- ` ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST PN-6145A DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 U I I 11! SITE PLAN LEGEND SITE PLAN PLANTING SCHEDULE WI M G LD ci I s i ER 1 7 I , m LIMIT OF WORK GROUNDCOVER SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/COMMON NAME SIZE/SPACING OTY .., • .;:❖: SUNMARK 'WOODLANDS' SEED MIX TRASH RECEPTACLE •„ p•. PICNIC TABLE 34% ROSH NUTKANA/NOOTKA ROSE 1 22% CORNUS STOLONIFERA/RED OSIER I. 000 • I ' y • _ _ SPLIT RAIL FENCE W/ 20% SYMPHOCARPUS ALBA/SNOWBER 41) FRAXI US EXCELSIOR/ 3” CAL/AS SHOWN 4 • WELDED WIRE MESH 14% AMELANCHIER ALNIFOUA/SERVIC BERRY GOLDEN DESERT ASH OWNER >x 3' CHAIN LINK FENCE 8% SAMBUCUS COERULEA/BLUE E •ERBERRY CIN orIlgord 1% PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS/PACI C NINE BARK Public Works Department 1 1% HOLIOISCUS DISCOLOR/OCEAN PRAY 8777 SW Burnham Street 1 ® ® STONE LANDSCAPE regard,OR 97223 siiiii, BOULDERS AM AGER MACROPHYLLUM/ ® 3• CAL/AS SHOWN 1 � 0 0° 00 O TREE STUMP STOOLS PLANTING PLAN NOTES BIG LEAF MAPLE j.t +I I G %1 6 1 CUSTOM WOOD BENCH 1 THIS PLAN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PROVIDat BY l 'To SOIL PATH CESNW, INC. DRIV= AY l : I CONSULTANTS iiiiir4 ' EXISTING TRANSFORMER 2. MIG IS NOT LIABLE FOR THE EXACT LOCATION • CORNUS NUTTAWI/ 1 1/Y CAL/AS SHOWN 6 UWDSCAPEARCHRECTl1RE • * . ® ANY EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD PACIFIC DOGWOOD _ , HI (' "� I' VERIFY THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF OTICRT Moore15 SW 2 d Ave,Suite XXI _ EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE 615 SW 2 d Ave,Suite 200 BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY SITE PREPARATION, Pot-Bond,OR 97204 N.N I1 e.. DEMOLITION, OR CONSTRUCTION. ' c } i rill OPEN SOIL VOLUME AREA SURVEYOR \� I I W ••• !1 ---- PROPERTY UNE CESNW.Inc. 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER'SNIS' AGER CIRCINATUM/ MULTI-STEMMED/ 2 13190 SW 66th Pkwy.Suite ISO 4 v REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. VINE MAPLE SHOWN Tigard,OR 97223 f'i EASEMENT UNE AS I `� UTILITY POLE 4. ALL TREE LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD BY I R I -C L ❑ CATCH BASIN OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO PLANTING. ARBORIST I 4•• • s•E.: 0 WATER VALVE Morgan Hobo Pkwy,Monroe Associates I I . 5. ALL PLANT SPECIES HAVE BEEN SELECTED FROME VARIES 5 3Lake Oswego.O�R 97035 J '�/ ® WATER METER I I I EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN IN, ,, NATIVE SPECIES PALETTES AND CONSIDER SOIL 1 qim, ri:. OIL 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLETYPES, HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS, AND SHADE THAT RECEIVES CANOPY CREDIT I + () STORM DRAIN MANHOLE REQUIREMENTS. THE 2013 TIGARO URBAN FORESTRY j Z UNE CONT. TO UNKNOWN LOCATION MANUAL WAS USED TO SELECT TREE SPECIES. II III E — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNE 6_ PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN. SHRUBS do GRASSES SENN PARK 1 I I ST— UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN UNE TRAILHEAD '4 ---G- ' 1 c1( SS— UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER UNE 7. TREES TO BE REMOVED ARE NOTED IN THE TREE 5 GAL/AS SHOWN 2 °i— •, G PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN. REMAINING TREES SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA/ Iia T— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE SHALL BE PROTECTED PER THE TREE PROTECTION RED ELDERBERRY UNDERGROUND WATER LINE SPECIFICATION AND TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE SW 74th Avenue 1 •( ) SAMBUCUS B ERULF�4/ 5 GAL/AS SHOWN 11 Tigard•OR97223 PLACED AT DRIP LINE. sc n 1 g : '., �� —TV— UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNE BLUE ELDERBERRY It� I I ��G— UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS UNE 8. HAND CLEAR AND GRUB WITHIN DRIPUNE UNDER TREES O � I I TO REMAIN. GAUTHERLA SHALLON/ 5 GAL/AS SHOWN 52 I cM-` 9. PRUNING OF LOWER TREE BRANCHES TO BE NEPETA X FAASSENII 'SIX HILLS Guwi' 5 GAL./AS SHOWN 22 I Ii� `\ DETERMINED ON SITE AT TIME OF PLANTING BY 0 CATMINT / i I II ` 1� ` OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. O e I 4 VACCINIUM X 'SUNSHINE 5' GAL/3' DC 40 I4 `` BLUE'/SUNSHINE BLUE • I #1096 BLUEBERRY REVISIONS DATE s< CH ,,, L MORGAN HOLEN, ATTEST THAT THIS =227.48' 4 t - J �O4 TREE CANOPY SITE PLAN MEETS ALL O PENNISETUM 1 GAL/2' OC 35 t i Of THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION ALOPECUROIOES ;0, PART 2, OF THE CITY OF T1GAR0 'HAMELN'/FOUNTAIN GRASS �!� t �� FORESTRY MANUAL. /t �. �+ • �' `\� 'iy?,,N,. (.4, WOODLAND SHRUBS IN n I I I I ,,,, �w�k •••'an •••6 • 30% GAULTHERIA I GAL/2' OC 220 I1AXIOT: 1St25DC09500 `-• SHALLON SAIAL ISACERTIFI•D ARBORISTPN-6145A 20% POLYSTN/SA A•UNRUM/ STAMP .11,119 /2- s L 1 P�28 M �� TESEBER202013 1 GAL./3' OC 65L ;4�g58 SF Ireel 1 f SWORD FERNSW REI.) 4 � 1 t ,�r:T s v t SX RISES SANGUINEUM/ 2 GAL./4' OC 30 CEDAI 'WAY 111'.,�,-, • RED FLOWERING CURRANT q �O�A�OO•�'OO .•A. .. / 2 GAL 3' OC 50 • r;if� + \ rel:, 1 15X MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM /w t :r3 � so_O�O.00:.• ..., -• . ill COMPACTA'/COMPACT I` O A A OREGON GRAPE 111111M O '+ p _ OOO lOX OEMELERIA CERASIFORMIS/ 2 GAl/4' OC 20 DATE I A 0-�r.�.Or — jO� 'OO -t t01 INDIAN PLUM SEPTEMBER 20.2013 ! '0, P jO. O Lv �) , 1I_ -- �� e a f \ ;�L' _ jO+O�O SF� l y ' 10% SNOWBERRY SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS/ 2 GAL/3' OC 30 II" SUBMITTAL LAND USE REVIEW O cP n WOODLAND UNOERSTORY PLANTING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DIOU a ` 20% FRAGARIA CALIFORNICA/ 4POT/PLANT IN 375 \ TAXQT: 1S123QC • DRAWN Bv: RE 0 / 'ems' 20% OXALIS OREGANA/ 4• POT/PLANT IN 375 ' • REDWOOD SORREL CHECEDfir: IN , 10% AD 1 GAL/2OC 105 MIGNO.: 01887.00 IANTUM PEDATU1 `O O• • MAIDENHAIR FERN CONSULT.NO.: XX • Q + -..`. lOX BLECHAM SPICANT/ 1 GAL../2' OC 105 N.] (( V O'4�{>I! ij _� �� . . DEER FERN SCALE: I 1 ►S►Q�100' I GAL/PLANT IN 105 1 NNN ♦ 7.V.•7.tiiV"'•:�"R."J�'Yvi� '�,r--.'vr�rw.r,....�.. .ar t lOX ACHLYS TRIPHYIIA/ * 1� •i•Pi i i �•i.••O•i di �i :•iii: !O • • • 21 Q{E�"' a P --- I -'I ©LIOG OOO.00 i%%%%O.OiOi'iiii••iOiO Oiiii••::• . .. • ~� .1 • VANILLA LEAF 0��01N .a.-.•�� ... .•.e..•.c.:•.�..�_._•_' mss*-•-•- 10% MAIANTHEMUM RACEMOSUM/ / SHEET iIILE, -- Wf Il I ... . :. "-SM..; �� .. _ • � •• - � � 1 GAL._ 2' OC 105 ! f LIMIT OF WORK FALSE SOLOMON'S SEAL i! PLANTING PLAN NOTE •• 't) 5% ASARUM CAUDATUM/ ' GAL/PuwT IN 75 TREE CANOPY & ROW a IT • L• .. • WESTERN WILD GINGER NAY I 10. LAYOUT OF PLANTING MIXES • :4-TIED I. 13. OBSERVE BIOS FOR a-•SION CONTROL PER CWS 4111 j WIDTH: 10' 0• FIELD BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE • AND CITY OF TIGARO;•EVELOPMENT STANDARDS. USE Sx CIMICUCA RACEMCSA/ 1 GAL./2' OC 50 PLANTING PLAN f j �/// SIDEWAUt WIDTH: 5'-0" BLACK COHOSH PLANTING. INLET PROTECTION0OFILTER BAGS AT CATCH 1 GAL./PLANT IN 75 ---- --` BASINS, PLASTIC, HELPING FOR STOCKPILED SOIL 5% TRILLIUM OVATUM/ SHEET NO. OPEN SOIL VOLUME IN NORTH PLANTER STRIP: 11. PLANT COUNTS FOR SHRUBS ARE SUPPLIED = SEDIMENT ETC. SEE C1.0. WESTERN WHITE TRILLIUM 230 SF • 3 690 CF (TREE /O1) THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR / 5% VACCINIUM PARVIFOLIUM/ 1 GAL/3' OC 25 1 RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTAWNG ALL PLANTS IN 14. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WILL BE USED IN PLANTING RED HUCKLEBERRY 1 OPEN SOIL VOLUME IN SOUTH PLANTER STRIP: LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES SHOWN. AREAS DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD- / t4' / II 370 SF • 3 = 1110 CF (TREES /11-/13, OVERLAP ALLOWED) 12. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION 15. SPLIT RAIL FENCE AND TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO PLANTING PLAN. UNDER ARBORIST SUPERVISION. I MIG SITE PLAN LEGEND LIMIT OF WORK SOIL PATH • __. I 1 \\\ \\\\\_ ,\\\\ ® SPLIT RAIL FENCE W/ OWNER \\ TRASH RECEPTACLE I \ \ \ \ WELDED WIRE MESH City of Tigard IT-II- \\\‘ ., 0 \\\ \\ - • Public Works Department I � \ 1 PLOP BENCH 3' CHAIN LINK FENCE 8777 SW Burnham Street 1 I \ `\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ •, PARK BENCH CONCRETE PATH Tigard,OR 97223 - ��/� g� - • t " \ \\ \\ \\\\\ \ ® ® STONE LANDSCAPE CONCRETE SEATWALL \ \\ \\ \\\\\\\\\A\ \\ ® BOULDERS DRIV: AY I .� \ \\ \\\\ \\ 0 00 TREE STUMP STOOLS WOOD FIBER SAFETY SURFACING CONSULTANTS 00 0 `• ---8- _ 1� I \\ \\ \\ \ \\ L. I CUSTOM WOOD BENCH 0 PLAY AREA CATCH BASIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE �•• I t 1 \ \\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\`\ PA PLANTING AREA - - - - STORM DRAIN PIPE M 815 SW 2nd Avore lacofano e,Suite c. �\ I I , \ \ \ \ Portland,OR 97204 I R \ \ \ \ \ \ X MINOR CONTOURS (E) \ \` EXISTING TRANSFORMER SURVEYOR I I -1]J- - I, 1 \ n \ \ \\ \\ \` \ MAJOR CONTOURS (E) 1,i tits ` \ \ ,{{� PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS CESNW,Inc. II s n L I \\ \(•,/\\ \�\\;\ \ \ \\ \\ -1$)- EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURS 13190 9aat OPkwy, to 150 3 -�� u \ \ 11 \ R 97223 I Nit \\ \ \ `\\ \ ---- PROPERTY LINE ARBORIST MorI N ;'g` l\\ \ \\\ 1\\1\\ \\ \ \\ \ \ EASEMENT LINE 3 Monroe Pkwy,n Nolen 8,5 Associates P 220 I I ` ` \ \ ` \ EXISTING UTILITIES Lake Oswego,OR 97035 I • t - ((j) - ; o\ 1 \ \ \ \ \\ `1 l \ \ \ 'LbUTILITY POLE !n I \ \ ` \ \` \ I \ \IL � 1 y \ \ 1 ,1 \\\\\\ ', ` ` , 11 I \ \ \ ❑ CATCH BASIN k 0 WATER VALVE Ir 1 © WATER METER SENN PARK o" -- -1-1.--- --- .G ` G — II, \\ \ ` 1`\ i1 ' lam` ` \ \ \ ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE r ! I I - �� \ \ \‘'Aa J�rFT�' II \\ \\ \\\\ \ J� STORM DRAIN MANHOLE TRAILHEAD I ' I Z LINE CONT. TO UNKNOWN LOCATION - I \ \\c ' I I I \ \ \ \ _ - _ - E - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE SW 74th Avenue I II T I r \AO I I ) I \ \ \\ \ _ _- - - - - - - -ST- UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN LINE Tigard,OR 97223 I II \ \ l \ \ \- -_ _ - - —SS= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE EN i )'a \ \ _ = - - \ \ --••• ........"— —T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE ----( ;--- li T- I t!) \\ LJ I ( I I \�` \ \\ - �. r_ )/— _ - -- N —W— UNDERGROUND WATER LINE C I f , ,,,\,,,,,,, 1 I I \\' - - \ _ _+ - - - �� \\\ —TV— UNDERGROUND CABLE TV LINE . , , „ ..., ..._ ___ _..... ...... I _ - - - - ` \\ -G— UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS LINE , , 1 I • 1 I U - OM1` \ \ \O - ... 44°; 1 \ / / \ \ \ \ \\ REVISIONS DATE • .--cr.- —_—12I_ +4I_ £ ++ , 1 \1\PU' \ ,-- R „ > eNr `\!v7 \ \ \ 4J/ / ‘/ / ` 'moi= 1\\\\\\\N ) ....,,,, _ ,,, -I-i - / 18" ONCR SEATWALL f \\ \\ \\ \ N. 1 \\ \�.. //T r �` STAMP �pSW RE TE ENT - III , I -PA— - \\ \\ \\\ \ _ ice/% / \� , - -� / \ \\\s ED ' ' SP�ENCF. TYP. Ivt - ` ,..,-.....z.2�\ . `\ \ \\\ J/ / / _ \�`/`. CE AIX WAYc c PL4zA AREA - \ N. �\ \\ // // /-�'' `` l _ \ / � � PAI( C T�1P. 1I�i'I�I, 11. \ \ -` 1 \ \i/ �/ --\ -r I -► \ - \ \ um I�tws �A- \\ itAtisi:\�\ /_ _ T ....... \ w S�NG EWALK o•.v::❖o.•. .••'•'•_ _- \ = \c \ �/ / ti - -/- - `-1 / BI E RACKS ` ` \ \ �Igi E / � \ \ \ \\/ �A ��I �I Go ` \ _ IICRETE Z`U ::\/ �\ •1 % \ _ \\ \ uxe "'ev DATE \� nN PARK ET ICE ��I�1� _ \ STS O�i NBout,DECkI — — �__—=_` — \` \ \ .Mvc SEPTEMBER 20.2013 P K SIGNA II��.�r� :a•,,' +� Nit , \ ` \ \ ♦`- i% ,\ \\\ t ,A0 et, H REC�E ACLE. TYP. 11 1_I,�., 0 0 9 ® AM, .\ \ \ \ - - -L - - - _ - - \ \ t- SUBMITTAL TREE 5TUME1 SIM (10) \ t \ GAS \Er �' CUSTOM f IIG.4=2,I .�° c1 •> � \\` \\ — `�=-T ` \ \ \°i LAND USE REVIEW RISER LO;.; BENCH (2) 1I�I11r .- �1 M \ \P� \ \ —�\� — *' \ \\ \ "ooE�w.G -- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION aism PAN, ` DER. • •' • ••••\ \ \ \ - _ 1 I \\ \ \\ wr.uuae IS 14 DRAWN BY: RE 6 Dim — __ \ CHECKED BY: TH LACK VL COATED �.� ,v 9 `� 'i®��. l��I�■��1�■► \ — A��_�n0 _�� \\ \\\ �-. Ck17UNttNFC CE - I �■i \— Cf_ _I� •• • \ \ \\ .o, 1 MIG NO.: 01887.00 W OD FlBE G_ / c �?. \ _ hl --'TcE/ � \\ \\ \ \\ \ .E.A,.C11,Ba _ CONSULT.NO.: XX S ALR NSION / w" 1! - - \ \ \\ \\ 9,.:"-- 1 SCALE: ----- - — - PA - PA - - I� - \ \ •�� \ I \ I�"" �t R OF WORK KOMPAN �SPICA' \ ` �� EcM 0' s10' zo I,nOMPAN SUPERNOVK i \ \ a DRIVEWAY — —r ` ` 18a CONCRETE NIN/G ANAL-/ \\ \ \ D1'RT TRAIL \ \ --2'�IRT PATH NATURAL AREA �• SHEETTITLE 1 �j U�IKOMPAN ,SLAYING EIRIDE' , \ TREE-STUMP STOOLS (8), y�,,,,,� ,,,`,� ,,, ,� ,,,�,,,, SITE DEVELOPMENT III _ _ �///"'111✓ / / / / \ \ HEIGHT AND DIAMETER VARIES ft,. 1 .i, I � +r t I / ---...„ \ \ �� \ \ \ INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE • PLAN -. t - \ / ' \ / / / N N N - - \ TR/11LH�F hD AREA MAY 11.011.1 '0 / — ter~ \�C— /— —i / N . \ — \ \ N ,Ux SHEET No. �v N t N _ i �J/ won rEOE.wEDuoww.ua�.muuo wa.0 T...� yyW1d -� _ - .. / I I_ - . — — / Ar... N �� _ _ �, Mfg.Co..IncgTnanm "Gu...».10..,romne.C.s -•.11-1772�.r OK wa. I I . Fr TR�pE (^ C t� ��` ♦♦♦ I r bRR1op X127.Dpi SNEEt r0 NORTH J • V V I I T E, MpVED.'cEE AR80R151'S - _ y� \ E 1 ER \ t . . - 11191 SC4 511th Mvkwat Stoic l IA) I � . IA. I I �. 1" . 'reward,: ; w 'r' nw �' • E%TG STORK FIII 81363_________,-1-__-,--, 1 �, 1' '! Fir 1I I 4. -` __ _... f RIM.222.89 I - '\ r ./o,, Ij \ y '� OWNER 1E IN 16•SI.216.39 r N• � • - ExTG IE OUT.204.39 - - �J! r ` `-` •p '�./�' �� City of Tigard • r �qRp TREE TO'AlTFAIn ITYP.) _ Pubtiic Works Deportment $ i, -� ` Ea I,;�, A>1 8777 SW Burnham Street 111 4 0r� `\ F'e4r �. 'ea - Tigard.OR 97223 > r STEEL w a I i d 4 !� r:.t W{f - -`* - moi. 'N.-, , Q i i \p FT.RUE rtt LTER•EABRIC ` ..,` n., --. __.__._. PER RT _ 1•. N 11 1t IPS.:'-.. :RCCN4'T KKdNS - • f ',--r- r.. c 0 A - tf IE OUT(61 so \�' CONSUL TAN IS 1 N i -- LOT 28 .-.. '`-- • -. a 2 S i ---.INSTALL SEDIMENT FtEEc� _ �, `. }s'.... • NOTE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AlE�l715 SHEET(TYP) t`\ 1t _. FSFINI511E0 SURFACE ELEVATION Moore Iocotano Goltsmon.Inc- ---- .__ f....�_ a r o 4 � - J I,\'' 4•• _. ,..> TW top of WALL ELEVATION 815 SW 2nd Ave,Suite 200 --7 1 +. S` - 11"°. 2T �. i Portland.OR 97204 �.J D :. r '� !1 \ 8w-BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION F 01 t 5� '7 ` . •.•_ t3#' TC-TOP OF CURB 1 Nr0,. .. A 'L' I y yet J T+N� ,. ` - FS PLAY AREA ERLEVA1TON OF ETE WALK ELEVATION SURVEYOR fyjC 4 's ` ..k 1'14 " '',, 1 1 CESNW.Inc. 1 ty .• +fxd .,,'S�yl1 , 'f ' t 1 Ir AREA AT THE BOTTOM OF 08000 CHIPS 13190 SW 68th Pkwy.Suite 150 ❑ rWl It -.. _ O \ .. f .\ - - T d.OR 97223 r. ��®I�� ( ` ARBOR45t 2%1 �: 'w 1 1 t -- �a Morgan Holm 6 ASYOCKItes SW RED CEDAR WAY Tj ��' �" \ - 3 Monroe Pkwy.Suite P 220 `23 ti y "¢P \ ~I 1 Loke Oswego,OR 97035 FS 230.92 IIIIII -- F C�`` ♦y\•1ti - i 1 135.0241 (��7 SlC q. . . M14O. , ,- `=�.�L,-",/ ,� 3��6111•.vilirr . ' � . <5'��'� ;`gig° y as `Y `� o�_ SENN PARK � INSTALL lNIET PRDTECTIUN 1 _ k. 4.? ,,,9 ��`• O... •6.. \, �L1 .L'S�1e�.. _ `+•♦ N A R K PER DETAIL THIS SHEET iTYP.) -`-----_ t b•� :• k ,� .•. N �e t•44�C, ,p4 �\\ ta7 �^{ - .. r) ,T,•F Ca •I PP r 4 i 1,•� V.' ` \oiP" ;. .. , , 1:,,, TRAILHEAD E A F sC' • r 4 ? P ~ I �,1'., 1`�, i .. - -___. ! SW 74th Avenue • .r '� 1 s '�'�D' , it� i - `I �i✓ -�- __ _�y,rpt ,�-- s\ Tigard.OR 97223 (r i FS COW 211.61 .l f �� I ❑ 1' u - I - - -- -- -- - --.1. - 111: 42.44:____-- 210 • ti^ yq TREE TO 8E REMOVED {R • PATH TO BE FIELD LOCATED' DRIVEWAY I ` g g' �- da 2s Fr 0810E ACCESS .ER 8 ( 'M-. . -'-r- oN REVISIONS DATE '4It > I TALL GRAVE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR THE e 1 1r "' "' -� BENEFIT OF LOT 28 • 'i ;c ANCE DETAIL THIS SHEET I 1,� 3 3 '4. . - m , , ( ; , 10 S 0 10 ROM STAMP 1 PRir .�n.h..n. ...... n..�....•,•1-at...ow.n.u..a w ao.o .x�i,,.om.u..rt..NJ* I ANGIE MIER TARIM 110.4400. 0.4 _-_ � • FENCE TO ASSURE Sal 6 TRAPPED o 11A,-14.t?' .. V•1111.1[111.• .....•.1w:: +... ••••:•••••`VCori...n.«eomemssonv1. .o..r��:.�o�:a: PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES • Appendix A. Pre-Application Conference Notes • • Appendix A A-1 City of Tigard Senn Park September 24,2013 • CITY OF TIGARD II PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) TIGARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 1 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: Steve Martin, City of Tigard AGENT: Phone: 503-718-2583 Phone: ( ) - PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 9868 SW 74th Avenue TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): IS125DC 09500&09600 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Conditional Use permit, Sensitive Lands Review(?) j PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Development of a pocket park and trailhead. Proposal includes: landscaping,walkways, picnic shelter, play structure, etc. • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: R-4.5 (PD) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.510& 18.330.050 B5) MINIMUM LOT SIZE:N/A sq. ft. Average Min.lot width: N/A ft. Max.building height.30' ft. Setbacks: Front: 30' ft Side: 30' ft. Rear: 30' ft. Corner:30'ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE:N/A%. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:N/A%. 18.330.050 B5-All building setbacks shall be a minimum of 30 feet from any property line. ® NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES,AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) • The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 I�<)N-Residential Application/Planning lln'vnn Section ED IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18390.050) • As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation system,induding bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. O ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:. Minimum access width:ft. Minimum pavement width: . All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas:ft. ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) • STREETS: feet from the centerline of • > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the sites boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. I I SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: M. A maximum building floor area to site area ratio(FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist, P. All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/2)of the building's height, and P. The structure will not abut a residential zoned district ❑ BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745 &18.620) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences,utilities,and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: ti/a feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. 7 feet along south boundary. n/a feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:N/A. • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 N(* Rcsidcnml Application/Planning Drvmon Sect.on • SCREENING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS- 18.745.050E Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E(1). In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming. In addition,screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one and two family dwellings. ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.620) STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet(if the number is a fraction,round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART 'OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III),AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II)All parking areas,including parking spaces and aisles,shall be required to achieve at least 30%tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. ❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a dear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's • Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040&18330.050B5) 18.330.050B5- There are no off-street parking requirements,except that five automobile parking spaces are required for a dog park or off-leash area with a fenced area of one acre or more,along with an approved parking plan for anticipated peak use periods.Off-site peak use or overspill parking shall require a signed agreement with the landowner providing the additional parking.Three automobile parking spaces are required for a dog park or off-leash area with a fenced area of less than one acre,along with an approved parking plan for anticipated peak use periods.Offsite peak use or overspill parking shall require a signed agreement with the landowner providing the additional parking. REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking. Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):. HANDICAPPED PARKING: OP All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ▪ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be • provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIG.ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ® BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) • BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of use:0.3 /1.000 gross floor area(of picnic shelter). ® SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries.is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1S PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ® STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ® CLEAN WATER SERVICES(CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-tester 3) LAND DEVFT OPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the • required widths: • TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA' CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25"-0 I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet 25 feet I >50 to<100 acres • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining. >25% 10 to<50 acres 30 feet 50 feet I >50 to<100 acres • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine° 4Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/m-crs,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection_ Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. t1'cgetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Applicatioin/Planning I)nision Section lois .-t rtc,- -- a,,+I bJ`r o' -- --fir:r • 6.m.vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. Jhc 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped a.... .. geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVFT OPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCFT.5 or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter. PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ® SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C. ® URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the"Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLWING TYPES OF DEVFT.OPMENT: • Conditional Use (Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development (Type III);Sensitive Lands Review(Type II and III);Site Development Review(Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover required: 40% (Refer to Appendix 2-6 in ( /pan Forestry Manualfirr a list of trees with mature canopy cover areas) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor(the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall rovide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. •® PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or • more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area.Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements. ❑ CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE(3)AND EIGHT(8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the dear vision area. I 1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ® 18.330(Conditional Use) n 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) n 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) D 18.340(Directors Interpretation) n 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) n 18.350(Planned Development) 1 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ® 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) • [I] 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ® 18.780(Signs) n 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) n 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) n 18.380(Zoning Maplrext Amendments) n 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan) U 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) n 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ® 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) I I 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) (1I 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) n 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) n 18.420(Land Partitions) Ti 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) [ I 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ® 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ® 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 7 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) n 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) n 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) n 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: PROCEDURE tiL Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. -�� Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS • All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8'/z" x 11". One,8'/2"x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional tune to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardHearings Officer. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or • modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as • unnecessary by the Planning Division). CITY OF TIG ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Aptlication/Plannins Division Scet.nt • PREPARED BY: Agnes Kowacz CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 DIRECT: 503-718-2427 EMAIL: @tigard-or.gov TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov • • CITY OF TIG.-kRD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Scction 1111 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ligDEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING TIGi a al r City r1tearil,erenen ('ommunity Development Sfiaping.i Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map(s): 1S125DC Senn Park Tax lofts): 9500.9600 Use Type: R4.5 The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. The lot to be improved is within a fully developed subdivision. Public improvements have been approved. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: • (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. No additional right-of-way is required. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (� SW to feet SW to feet n SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: (Subject to rough proportionality) ❑ Half street improvements will be necessary along SW Cascade Avenue to include: n _ feet of pavement from centerline to face of curb (11-foot travel lanes, 8-foot parking and bike lanes) [1 concrete curb ❑ 5-foot planter exclusive of curb • 7 storm sewers and other underground utilities CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Development Engineering _-foot concrete sidewalk street trees • street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: Pavement tapers as needed 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements: This section sets requirements for additional setback distance from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus one-half of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map. Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: I J Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines• adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. Sanitary Sewers: Proposed improvements do not require sewer service. Water Supply: The City of Tigard provides public water service in this area. This site is already connected to water. Coordinate with the City of Tigard for information regarding adequate water supply for the proposed development. Water service is proved by TVWD. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: John Wolff, 503-259-1504] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Development EngineeHng All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to • an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm drainage is provided. Storm Water Quality: Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: Construction of an on-site water quality facility. I Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: • TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX The Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single- family home. Pay TDT as required. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement(PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from Development Engineering. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit Center at City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The PFI permit application shall include any on-site water quality • and detention facilities that may be required as part of the land use approval. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Development Engineering The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer• Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. A PFI permit is required for this project. This permit must be obtained before any work begins on site. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It. covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. PREPARED BY: 5.11A. r �s, 8 �s DEVELOPMENT E GINEER DATE Phone: [5031718-2468 Fax: [5031718-2748 Revised: March 2012 I:\ENG\GREG\Development\For Mike\Preapp Senn Park 5-9-13.docx • CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Development Engineering • 777`7",?--FCit o Ti andY f g TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX I TIGARD Rate Calculation Worksheet APPLICANT � d� ,� , DATE '� / '5/ 3 MAILING ADDRESS / 3/ PREPARED BY / CITY/ZIP/PHONE---7-7-&•1.2.> 9 Z L PLANS CHECIO�-2e/3-QO[J I TAX MAP# / / 5 LQ 15-0 OO Q�G Q D PROJECT TITLE/ SITUS#ADDRESS gi/_C� ✓�� ry FORMER USE(S) 7 U#E CODE UNITS ITE X RATE = AM�UN I DESCRIPTION/NOTES / . 257x - _ 64/be v6_ e (iie `,t1P2ov�HEJ� ?S� x = • x- - TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) �J PROPOSED USE(S) U#E CODE UNITS ITE X RATE = AMpUNT DESCRIPTION/NOTES r 4/ 1 .�5 x moi, to S te iso sue_ P.e ,2 - x = X TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) /' -/ 74, LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) — TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) (INCREASE=TDT DUE) PAYMENT METHOD CASH/CHECK NOTES CREDIT BANCROFT AGREEMENT (PROMISSORY NOTE) • DEFER TO OCCUPANCY t/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09) ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS