Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2001-00012
SDR2001 - 00012 Learning Tree Day School 120 DAYS = 3/27/2002 CITY O TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community CITY OF TIGARD `Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00012 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2001-00027 Case Name: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL Name of Owner: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Name of Applicant: Jim Waddle - Waddle Design/Planning/Architecture Address of Applicant: 1927 NW Kearney Street Portland, OR 97209 Address of Property: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901 A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FAGS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW AND A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 14, 2002 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: Y The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. Zoning Designation: I-L: Light Industrial District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested 1 Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: CI Owners of Record Within the Required Distance LI Affected Government Agencies El The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator El The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 22, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 6, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.6.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 5, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. ' r BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Tri-County Industrial Park for ) FINAL ORDER Site.Development and Sensitive Lands reviews and a lot line ) SDR 2001-00012 adjustment for a Learning Tree day care center at the corner ) SLR 2001-00008 of SW Bonita Rd. and SW Milton Ct. in the City of Tigard ) MIS 2001-00027 A. SUMMARY 1. This final order concerns an application by Tri-County Industrial Park (the "applicant") for Site Development and Sensitive Lands reviews and a lot line adjustment for a Learning Tree day care center on a roughly 2.5-acre parcel north and east of the Bonita Community Church in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Bonita Road and Milton Court; also known as tax lots 01900, 01901 and 0200, WCTM 2S112AB (the "site"). a. The applicant proposes to adjust the between the two legal lots that constitute the site to create lots containing roughly 80,130 square feet and 29,600 (MIS 2001-00027). Both proposed adjusted lots will comply with dimensional requirements of the I-L(Light Industrial) zone and with the other applicable standards of the CDC. The applicant does not propose to develop the larger of the adjusted lots at this time. b. The applicant proposes to develop the smaller of the two adjusted lots for the day care center(SDR 2001-00012). The proposed structure and associated development will or can comply with applicable standards of the Tigard Community Development Code ("CDC"). c. A portion of the access for the day care center will cross a portion of the 100-year flood plain; therefore a sensitive lands review is required for that crossing(SLR 2001-00008). Although the applicant did not introduce substantial evidence that the proposed development of the flood plain will comply with applicable standards,the applicant argued that it is feasible to do so before development occurs. 2. At the public hearing in this matter, City staff recommended approval, subject to conditions. See the Staff Report dated January 3, 2002 (the Staff Report). The applicant accepted the staff recommendations as amended at the hearing and waived its right to have the record held open for final argument. Other than relevant service providers and public agency staff,no one testified orally or in writing with objections or concerns. The hearings officer closed the record at the conclusion of the hearing. 3. For the reasons provided and referenced in this final order, the hearings officer approves the applications, subject to the conditions recommended by City staff with certain changes described more herein. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing on January 14, 2002 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list, materials in the casefile as of the close of the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing,the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts,bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. a. City planner Brad Kilby summarized the proposed development,the applicable approval standards,the Staff Report and recommended conditions of approval. b. City engineer Brian Rager testified that the applicant did not agree to grant an easement to the church adjoining the site to allow the church to use the driveway on the site for access to the church, and the CDC does not authorize the City to require the applicant grant such an easement. Therefore he recommended the hearings officer delete recommended condition of approval 16, which required the applicant to grant such an easement. c. Jack Steiger testified for the applicant. He introduced a letter in which he responded to concerns by the City Property Manager that the proposed outdoor play area for the day care center is too close to the railroad tracks that adjoin the east edge of the site. Summarizing the letter,he testified there is a very small chance that a train would leave the tracks at the site frontage,because the speed limit for trains in that section of track is 25 miles per hour, the track is relatively straight,the track is a constructed of continuously welded rails and the rail crossing at Bonita Road is a recently improved, state-of-the-art crossing. If a train did leave the track,based on the history of such incidents, train cars are likely to remain within 20 feet of the track. The closest point of the proposed playground is 38 feet from the track and extends to 60 feet from the track. Therefore even if a train accident occurs abutting the site,there is a"very, very slim chance"that it would endanger children playing in the outdoor play area of the day care center. He testified the applicant accepts the Staff Report and the recommended conditions with the amendment proposed by Mr. Rager and that there is ample room to meet parking,pedestrian and landscaping requirements as provided in those conditions. He also waived the applicant's right to submit a closing written argument after the public hearing. Proposed day care center operator Jim Blackwell also appeared but did not offer any testimony. d. (Pastor)George Crisman of the adjoining church appeared and testified about concerns,including a concern about odors he believes emanate from the nearby CleanWaterServices ("CWS") sanitary sewer trunk line, a concern about increased storm water drainage toward the church building, and the relatively high volume of vehicular traffic on Bonita Road. He testified that traffic poses a safety hazard for the two to three dozen children who walk to the church for Wednesday and Saturday activities, and that the traffic will pose an obstacle for day care patrons, too. He discussed parking and access at the church, describing how access is provided to the church by means of a(nonconforming) driveway to Bonita Road, and that two or three vehicles can park on the concrete driveway behind the church. Other church-bound vehicles park on surrounding streets. Mr. Rager responded to the issue of the odor from the sewer trunk line to the effect that CWS can do little about the odor. 2. The hearings officer expressed concern about the lack of substantial evidence in the record to show that development of the proposed access across a portion of the flood plain would comply with the applicable provisions of CDC 18.775.070.B(1) or(3). Given that the application was subject to hearings officer review only because of development in the flood plain, the applicant should have been required to provide such evidence for the application to be complete. However,in this case,because only a small section of the flood plain is involved and the applicant does not propose any structures or fill in or adjoining the flood plain,the hearings officer concluded it was sufficient to delegate to the Director the responsibility for determining that the applicant will comply with CDC 18.775.070.B(1) or (3)before any site work. See proposed condition of approval 21. The hearings officer closed the public record at the end of the hearing and announced his intention to approve the applications subject to the conditions recommended by City staff with the amendment offered at the hearing. SDR 2001-00012, SLR 2001-00008 Hearings Officer Final Order and MIS 2001-00027(Learning Tree day care) Page 2 C. DISCUSSION City staff recommended approval of the application based on findings and conclusions and subject to conditions of approval recommended in the Staff Report with one amendment. The applicant accepted those conditions as amended. No one disputed the findings in the Staff Report. The hearings officer agrees with those findings, conclusions and conditions as amended by the discussion of testimony above, and adopts the affirmative findings in the Staff Report as support for this Final Order. D. CONCLUSION The hearings officer concludes that the Site Development Review, Sensitive Lands Review and Lot Line Adjustment applications do or can comply with the relevant standards and criteria of the Tigard CDC as provided in this Final Order, provided the application is subject to conditions of approval that ensure finals plans and certain other information are provided and found sufficient by the Director in a timely manner and that subsequent development will comply with applicable CDC standards and criteria. Therefore those applications should be approved subject to such conditions. E. DECISION Based on the findings and conclusions provided or referenced in this Final Order, the hearings officer hereby approves SDR 2001-00012, SLR 2001-00008 and MIS 2001- 00027 subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report with the following amendments: 1. Recommended condition of approval no. 16 is hereby deleted, although the hearings officer encourages the applicant to grant easement described therein. 2. Recommended condition of approval no. 21 is hereby amended to read as follows (added text is underlined): 21. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide certification from a registered professional engineer that the proposed encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and will not result in any increase in flood levels or water surface elevation during the base (100-year) flood. 3. Recommended condition of approval no. 22 is hereby amended to read as follows (added text is underlined): 22. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the Oregon Division of State Lands (ODSL) that indicates the proposal does not need their approval or that such approval has been granted. DATE this 21st d. - of .nuary, 2002. Larry Epstein, cif P City of Tigariiigs Officer SDR 2001-00012, SLR 2001-00008 Hearings Officer Final Order and MIS 2001-00027(Learning Tree day care) Page 3 • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: January 14,2002 1 ',!?'",!.7,1,7.Z :1„:"--1;;;;;; STAFF REPORT TO�THE {; uhr , 1,_ de :- HEARrINGS}OFFICER r ' 'r a,CITrOFTIOARD t rI r nax 4'a 1 x .Na s�rr y;,.f a €r r 7i.:jam,a1. 3+y.0 Ofl IIIUILity development ` FOR THE CITY"OFr TIGARD OREGON R S�Inn9f�PBetter.ommu,i1-v :6^d• _,< .. �:va,`�..s raw':'I^ssr ac;.�.,.a .£..�.er.A i sn.uw>v�`,ad'..�..n.mna��..5.a a ..ten o-��^�"z�'aAnite� �..� 120 DAYS = 03/27/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL CASE NOS: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00012 Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) SLR2001-00008 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS) MIS2001-00027 APPLICANT/ OWNER: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. ARCHITECT: Jim Waddle Attn: Jack Steiger 1927 NW Kearney St. 301 NW Murray_ Blvd. Portland, OR 97209 Portland, OR 97229 PROPOSAL: The!.applicant has proposed a Daycare Center within the Light Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompass a portion of the site. The applicant has also requested a lot line adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and Milton Court, and is described as: WCTM 2S112AB, Tax Lots 01900 ,01901, and 02000. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial: I-L Light Industrial District. . The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including • industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. Daycares are allowed in this zone subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment in accordance with TDC Section 18.530.050(C)(1). The design of the daycare must fully comply with the State of Oregon requirements for outdoor open space. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION :Staff recorn`rnends that they Hearings Officerrfind'that the proposedS.SiteipeveloRent Review, ;Lot Line Adjustment,' and Sensitive Lands Review will not,adverselyWfect the^health, safety, Viand welfare of the City and meets the Approval, Standar"ds kTher>efore, Stefrrecommends 1 ,APPROVAL, subject to theefollowing recommendedConditionsbfrApproval LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 1 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWIN,G feONDITIONS'S HAL L BE'SATISFIED PRIOR TOFISSUANCE°OF THE SITE AND/OR=BUILDINGgPERMITS Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 1. Prior to recording, a Lot Line Adjustment survey map and legal descriptions showing the existing and proposed lot lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. The survey map shall include all access and utility easements. 2. A copy of the recorded survey shall be submitted to the City of Tigard for record keeping. 3. Prior to recording the Lot Line Adjustment, the applicant shall clear title between tax lots 1900. and 1901 through the lot line consolidation process or by providing reciprocal access easements between all three lots. 4. The applicant shall provide a revised access plan that provides a safe pedestrian walkway extending from the entrance of the building to SW Milton Court. The walkway shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and signposts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The walkway shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if,appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. 5. The revised access plan shall show the access to Milton Court to be 30-feet in width with 24-feet of pavement, and shall be constructed to this standard. 6. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to show compliance with Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.745.040 size and spacing. 7. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan illustrating the placement of trees within the interior of the parking lot at a ratio of one tree for every seven parking spaces and located within islands that are three feet wide and protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb along the east slide of the parking lot. 8. The applicant shall provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage as established in TDC Chapter 18.755, and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. 9. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the site plan to reflect the dimensions of the parking areas in accordance with Table 18.765.1 and indicate bumper overhang areas on the plan. If the applicant proposes to split the spaces between compact and standard, the new plan must reflect the compact spaces and they must be marked as such prior to final occupancy. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 10. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the installation of the new concrete driveway on SW Milton Court, and any other work in the public ROW. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 2 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 11. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 13. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will plant street trees along the frontages of SW Milton Court and SW Bonita Road. The trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2 inches and the species and the City Engineer and City Forester shall approve location. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate how they will provide sanitary sewer service to the new building. Staffs preference would be for the applicant to utilize the existing 4-inch service line that serves the existing home, provided the line size will meet Uniform Plumbing Code standards. 15. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering. Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have granted an ingress/egress easement to the Bonita Community Church parcel (2S1 12AB, #1600), for access to SW Milton Court. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED „_, y.,. .:_ ..,PRIOR=TO A�F,INAL BUILDING I�NSPECTION Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 17. The applicant shall install vertical slats into the chain link fence to screen the enclosure that is shown on the site plan. 18. Prior to final occupancy, the parking lot shall be striped in accordance with the TDC Chapter 18.765. 19. Prior to final occupancy, wheel stops shall be provided for all parking areas as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. 20. Pursuant to TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall provide 8 bicycle parking spaces for the site prior to final occupancy. 21. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide certification from a registered professional engineer that the proposed encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will not result in any increase in flood levels or water surface elevation during the base flood discharge. 22. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) that indicates that the proposal does not need their approval. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 3 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 23. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the CWS service provider letter and submit verification of compliance from both CWS and the projects qualified consultant from Schott & Associates. 24. Prior to site work, the applicant shall supply the City arborist with a tree protection plan to protect those trees on site that will remain on the site, and insure that said measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. 25. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan, that shows no projection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 26. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 27. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. • 28. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment units. gTHE a FAILURE T;O SATISFYtCONDITIONS`OF APPROVAL WITHIN18fMONTH � S � ,� V'k V OF, THEE EFFECTIVE3DATE OF THErHEARINGSfiOFFICER'STIDECISIONht , ; fT,I' ` ' "SHALL RENDER TH.E HEARINGS OFFICERtSrDECISI0N VOID'a ', � � � FI> �� , z.?'�,d., ,J._.,.,.,„-... s.. ... r,_ ,_.. ix .rrs•_',ka.�a..'.,...w.. a .i.,vtl, #�1 . .n':' ....� ,M1 F,..3a. +°#1 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A single-family home and pole building currently occupy the site. Lot 01901 was platted over in the plat of Bonita Industrial Park, and will be referred to in this report as lot 1 in conjunction with lot 1 of the aforementioned subdivision. A search of city records shows that aside from the Bonita Industrial Park Subdivision, no major alterations have been made to the site. There is very little history on the property within city records. Vicinity Information: There is a wide range of uses adjacent to this site. Directly to the north, south, and east of the site, there are a number of heavy and light industrial uses. Directly to the west of the site there are a lot of multi-family developments and the Fanno Creek greenway. There is a railroad track that runs along the western edge of the property. The most unique characteristic of the site is its proximity to the Fanno Creek drainageway including some wetland areas that exist on site. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a single-family home and pole building. The proposal involves demolishingthe home and constructingu a daycare center in its place. The applicant has proposed a LotLineAdjustment to adjust the property lines such that the pole building will reside on a separate lot. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 4 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct a daycare center in the Light- Industrial Zoning district. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed daycare facility is typically subject to a Type II staff review provided an Environmental Impact Assessment is submitted in accordance with Section 18.530.050.C.1. However, because a portion of the site is located within the 100-year floodplain and the associated floodway, all approvals for this request are subject to review before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer as a Type III-HO review. The request will require site development review approval, sensitive landsyreview approval, and a ministerial review approval for the proposed lot line adjustment. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET The Tigard Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal and be given the opportunity to provide written comments prior to a decision being made. Staff received no correspondence from citizens regarding this application. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.360 Site Development Review) 18.410 Lot Line Adjustments) 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 isual Clearance) B. Additional Site Development Review Approval Standards (18.360) C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810} D. Impact Study (18.390) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 5 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Site Development Review (18.360) The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Lot Line Adjustments (18.410) Section 18.410.040 - Approval Criteria states that the Director shall approve or deny a request for a lot line adjustment in writing based on findings that the following criteria are satisfied: An additional parcel is not created by the lot line adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustments is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; The application states that the proposed lot line adjustment includes three different tax parcels. However, in review of the sites history, tax lot 1901 was platted over in the Bonita Industrial Park Subdivision in 1992. According to the Washington County Cartographer's office, the area is no longer a separate parcel, rather, it is an area of Lot 1 of the named subdivision that still has a tax number assigned. Therefore, no new lots will be created as part of this adjustment; two (2) lots exist and two (2) lots will remain after the proposed adjustment. The I-L zone has no minimum lot size requirement, however, the lots will be approximately 80,130 square feet and 29,600 square feet respectively. This standard is satisfied. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structures(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; As previously indicated, both lots as configured by the Lot Line Adjustment will still have the ability to accommodate development that complies with the requirements of the underlying zoning district. This criteria has been satisfied. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district, including: • The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district; • The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the access way may not be included in the lot area calculation; • Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement; and • Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. Both lots will still meet the minimum standards of the respective zone as they apply to width, frontage, and setbacks and are discussed later in this report. This criteria is satisfied. With regard to flag lots: • When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. • A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an access way is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Section 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 6 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The flag lot associated with this application will be addressed later in this report. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an access way would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Access is discussed later in this report and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has had the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Their comments have been included as a part of this report. This criterion has been satisfied. Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705: Access, Egress, and Circulation. Compliance with Chapter 18.705 is discussed later in this report. This standard can be satisfied. Exemptions from dedications: A lot line adjustment is not considered a development action for purposes of determining whether floodplain, greenway, or right-of-way dedication is required. Variances to development standards: An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applicant has not requested a variance or an adjustment with this application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Lot Line Adjustment criteria have been met, however, staff is concerned that there may be future confusion with reference to tax lot 1901, and would recommend that the Hearings Officer impose the following conditions. CONDITIONS: e Prior to recording, a Lot Line Adjustment survey map and legal descriptions showing the existing and proposed lot lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. The survey map shall include all access and utility easements. • A copy of the recorded survey shall be submitted to the City of Tigard for record keeping. • Prior to recording the Lot Line Adjustment, the applicant shall clear title between tax lots 1900 and 1901 through the lot line consolidation process or by providing reciprocal access easements between all three lots. Industrial Zoning Districts (18.530) The subject property is zoned I-L (Light Industrial). Daycare uses with over 5 children are permitted subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment in accordance with Section 18.530.050.C.1. Additionally, the design of the daycare must fully comply with State of Oregon requirements for outdoor open space setbacks. The applicant should note that schools are not a permitted use in the I-L zone. Although the proposal has the word "school" in its title, the applicant has stated in telephone conversations that the building is only a daycare. It is the applicant's burden to insure that the use falls within the use classifications for the Light Industrial zone. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 7 OF 25. 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Development standards in Industrial Zones are provided in the following table: TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD,, .sem, ': �a OZ. IWIM . dF: ( .. . , WVNoposed'lotlkot2 .. Minimum Lot Size None None Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 130/145+ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 30 ft. 80/150 ft. -Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. 40+/N/A ft. -Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] Met - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3] Met - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street -- -- Maximum Height 45 ft. 19/existing ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 56% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 26% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5]Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050.8 are satisfied. [6]Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. The proposed building is approximately 19 feet in height and is well below the 45 foot maximum allowed height. As noted above, approximately 56% of the site will be covered with impervious surface area, including the building andparking area. This is well below the 85% maximum allowed in I-L zones. The remaining 44% of the site will be landscaped or utilized as playground area. The building will be setback approximately 80 feet from SW Milton Court, which exceeds the 30-foot front yard setback requirement. There is no applicable rear or side yard setbacks since the properties to the north and south are also zoned for industrial development. FINDING: The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable development standards in industrial zones. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705) Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in, multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant is proposing a new sidewalk to SW Bonita Road from the building entrance, but no sidewalk to SW Milton Court. Because the project's access is from SW Milton Court, and in accordance with the above standard, the applicant should be required to extend a walkway to SW Milton Court. The applicant can still extend a walkway to SW Bonita Road, but it is not required. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: The proposal does not provide a walkway from the ground floor entrance to the street, which provides the required access and egress as required in TDC Section 18.705.030(F)(1). LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 8 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal ' separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and There is no proposed crossings of vehicle access driveways or parking lots associated with the current proposal, however, in the conditioned revision of the previousstandard, the applicant should be cognizant of pedestrian safety in the design of the walkway that is extended to SW Milton Court. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant indicates that the new curb, gutter, and sidewalks will be constructed with concrete. This criterion has been met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section_ 18.705.030.1rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 99 parking spaces is one 30-foot-wide access with a 24- foot pavement width. The applicant has proposed one access point of 25-feet in width with 24-feet of pavement. This criterion has not been met. FINDING: The proposal does not show a 30-foot-wide access with 24-feet of pavement as requiredinTDC Table 18.705.3. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall provide a revised access plan that provides a safe pedestrian walkway extending from the entrance of the building to SW Milton Court. The walkway shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and .signposts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The walkway shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. • The revised access plan shall .show the access to Milton Court to be 30- feet in width with 24-feet of pavement, and shall be constructed to this standard. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 9 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER An environmental noise impact assessment was required as part of the application in accordance with the Tigard Development Code as it relates to permitting daycare facilities within industrially zoned properties. The assessment must show that noise from industrial sources does not negatively impact the proposed daycare site. The applicant has provided such a report from Daly-Standlee & Associates, an engineering firm that conducted sound measurements on January 5, 2001. According to the report, 'The amount of noise at the proposed daycare center site caused by industrial sources is less than that allowed by the Oregon DEQ...and much less than that allowed at a noise sensitive land use...of the Tigard Municipal Code.. The report also stated that traffic from 1-5, Bonita Road, and air traffic contributed a lot of noise to the study that was not considered industrial. The noises that could potentially affect the operation of the daycare are not primarily generated from the industrial uses, but rather from the traffic. It should also be noted that the City of Tigard's Property Managerexpressed concerns in regards to the proximity and noise associated with the train traffic that occurs adjacent to this parcel in his comments. Specifically, the concerns were with the location of the play area, and the failure of the report from Daly-Standlee & Associates to address the noise generated from passing trains. In reviewing these concerns, staff has brought this to the attention of the applicant. The applicant is performing research that will presumably be addressed during the public hearing. It is questionable as to whether train traffic will negatively impact the operations of the daycare facility. Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I-P) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission ofure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rles for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be rely detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: As this is not a typical industrial use, there is not the typical. machinery, emission stacks, or sound creating devices that would potentially create problem environmental conditions that have been listed above. The above performance standards are met. These standards would be subject to code enforcement investigation if for some reason, the above standards were in question. Landscaping and Screening (18.745) Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 10 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that provides for `flowering cherry' trees along SW Bonita Road that would meet this standard, however, the TDC requires that the trees be spaced according to their size at maturity. For this species, the recommended spacing is no greater than 30-feet on center and 2 inch caliper trees. The submitted landscape plan shows forty-foot on center spacing and 1 inch caliper trees. FINDING: The proposal fails to meet the street tree size and spacing requirements of TDC Section 18.745.040(C)(2)(b). CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to show compliance with TDC Section 18.745.040 size and spacing. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. The proposed daycare center is a permitted use within a Light Industrial zone and abutting industrial zones on three sides and open space on the fourth. As such, it is not subject to any required screening standards of the TDC or the buffering requirements of Table 18.745.1. The applicant has provided a landscape plan that shows landscaping abutting the three industrial zones. This criterion has been satisfied. Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has proposed a landscape design that would achieve the required result of the above standards. However, the applicant has not fully complied with the need for trees within the interior of the parking area along theeast side of the parking lot. FINDING: The proposal does not meet the criteria set forth in TDC Section 18.745.050(E)(1)(a.)(4). CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan illustrating the placement of trees within the interior of the parking lot at a ratio of one tree for every seven parking spaces and located within islands that are three feet wide and protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb along the east side of the parking lot. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755) Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 11 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant-will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not indicated which of the. 4 methods will be used to demonstrate compliance with this chapter, but has shown an enclosure on the site plan. FINDING: The proposal does not specifically detail which option of the four options available within TDC Section 18.755.040. CONDITION: The applicant shall provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage as established in TDC Chapter 18.755, and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Ifndoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent-to a public or privatestreet; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C; design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The site plan shows a trash enclosure with a wall and fence surrounding it within an interior side yard. The applicant has also indicated in the accompanying narrative that the recycling storage area meeting the minimum requirement criteria for industrial uses has been proposed. The site plan indicates a 100 square-foot enclosure, dedicated to this purpose. According to the TDC the applicant is required to provide 48 square feet. This standard has been met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storagearea shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gateopenings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not indicated on the site plan what type of screening will be utilized for the refuse container. They have indicated that there will be a 5-foot high chain link fence surrounding the enclosure. The gate opening is 10 feet wide, and the applicant has indicated that a hasp and padlock will be used to secure the gate. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of complete compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 12 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • CONDITION:The applicant shall install vertical slats into the chain link fence to screen the enclosure that is shown on the site plan. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765) Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The parking area has accommodations for two ADA accessible parking spaces that will meet the requirements for a 21-space parking facility. This criteria has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The applicant is required to provide a 30-foot access with 24-feet of pavement and has identified the visual clearance areas as required by the TDC. Access was discussed previously in this report, and visual clearance will be addressed later in this report. This standard can be met. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. • The applicant has not indicated that the parking lot will be striped, but has illustrated striping on the plans. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: The applicant has not indicated that the parking lot will be striped as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. CONDITION:Prior to final occupancy, the parking lot shall be striped in accordance with the TDC Chapter 18.765. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has proposed 6-inch concrete curbs at the edges of paving adjacent to planting areas, but has not indicated within the narrative or site plan that wheel stops will be provided. This criterion has not been met. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 13 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FINDING: The proposal does not address the requirements for wheel stops as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. CONDITION:Prior to final occupancy, wheel stops shall be provided for all parking areas as • required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for angled parking. The proposal identifies 18 spaces with the following dimensions: v'a Minimums 's Avi - Compacta i,z . cStandard= . � Compact/Standard € Sps • (inFeet) �.i,(PSroapv3.pa.�o„°c,.sees d ) x-a2* ryMfi �� s- �* �6ak- 1=Tral u.5 Parking Angle 90 degrees 90 degrees 90 degrees Stall Width V 7.5-8.0/8.5-10.0 8.5' typical 8.5' typical Stall Depth 16.5/18.5 15.6' 15.6' Aisle Width 24-28/24-28 28' 28' Stall Width Parallel to Aisle 7.5-8.0/8.5-10 +8.5' +8.5' Module Width 58-61/61-65 59' 59' FINDING: As illustrated in the table, the proposed parking lot fails to meet the minimum standards of Table 18.765.1. If the proposal that the parking angle remain at 90 degrees and a stall width of 8.5 feet stands, then the stall depth, aisle width, stall width parallel to the aisle, and module width should reflect the minimum dimensions for the standards as they apply within Table 18.765.1 for compact spaces and standard spaces independently. The Table must be read directly across and not interchanged to ensure function of the parking areas. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the site plan to reflect the dimensions of the parking areas in accordance with Table 18.765.1 and indicate bumper overhang areas on the plan. • If the applicant proposes to split the spaces between compact and standard, the new plan must reflect the compact spaces and they must be marked as such prior to final occupancy. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. The minimum bicycle parking requirement for daycare facilities is 1.5 per classroom, and the applicant has proposed 6 ribbon type bicycle parking spaces. This criterion has not been met. FINDING: The applicant has proposed 5 classrooms which, according to Table 18.765.2 requires 7.5 bicycle parking spaces. CONDITION: Pursuant to TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall provide 8 bicycle parking spaces for the site prior to final occupancy. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The minimum off-street parking requirement for daycare facilities is 2.0 per classroom. Therefore, this use would require 10 parking spaces. The proposal shows 21 spaces including ADA accessible spaces. This criterion has been met. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 14 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF.REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Sensitive Lands (18.775) The Hearings Officer shall have the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the 100-year floodplain by means of a Type IIIA procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070 B-E A majority of the wetland areas and the floodplain associated with this site will be on lot 2 of the Bonita Industrial Park Subdivision upon completion of the Lot Line Adjustment. However, both a wetland and the 100-year floodplain encumber a portion of Lot 1 of the same subdivision, and the lot on which the daycare facility is proposed. Within the 100-year floodplain. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; A natural resources assessment was prepared and submitted to Clean Water Services for the wetland and presumably the development of the access within the 100-year floodplain, however, staff neverreceived the assessment and cannot be certain that it addressed this criterion. Therefore, this criterion has not been satisfied. FINDING: The applicant has not provided any certification from a registered professional engineer that the encroachment of the access into the 100 ear floodplain will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. CONDITION:Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide certification from a registered professional engineer that the proposed encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will not result in any increase in flood levels or water surface elevation during the base flood discharge. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; A portion of the access will encroach into the 100-year floodplain, and the area is designated as industrial on the Comprehensive Plan land use map. This criterion is satisfied. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood; The condition that was recommended previously in this report should provide the information needed to analyze the impact of the proposed land form alteration on the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The greenway in which the Fanno Creek Trail system would possibly follow is located to the west of Milton Court. This parcel is outside of the location of any potential pathway. This criterion is met LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 15 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and It has not been ascertained as to whether or not the applicant would need any approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of.Engineers or the Oregon DSL for work within the 100-year floodplain, nor has the applicant provided evidence that would indicate that they are not necessary. The applicant has obtained a concurrence letter from the Oregon DSL relative to the wetland delineation that was performed by Schott & Associates that will be addressed later in this report. This criterion has not been satisfied. FINDING: The applicant has not provided any .evidence that would indicate that no approval from the USACOE and the Oregon DSL is necessary for the work that is proposed within the 100-year floodplain. CONDITION:Priorto site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the USACOE and the Oregon DSL that indicates that the proposal does not need their approval. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. There is no need for additional open land area within and adjacent to this floodplain as the majority of the floodplain belongs to the City of Tigard already. This criterion is satisfied. Within wetlands. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: Theproposed land form alteration or development is neither on wetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within 25 feet of such a wetland; - The proposed land form alteration is not within an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor within 25-feet of such a wetland. The wetland that is located on this site is defined as an isolated wetland that has been degraded in earlier developments. Clean Water Services, and the Oregon Division of State Lands have reviewed and concurred with a delineation that was provided by Shott & Associates as part of this application. This criterion is satisfied. The extentand nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; The applicant has provided a wetland delineation prepared by Schott & Associates that has been affirmed by the Oregon Division of State Lands and Clean Water Services (CWS). There is no proposed disturbance of the wetland, but there is disturbance of the CWS vegetated corridor that has been characterized as degraded by Heidi Berg, Site Assessment Coordinator for CWS. The proposed alteration is for access purposes. The City Engineer's review official, Brian Rager, has stated that access for this site was allowed only off of Milton Court to mitigate possible traffic impacts, and the proposed access is the minimum disturbance necessary for the use. This criterion is met. Any encroachment or,change in on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated; As stated above, the applicant has provided a delineation of the wetland, and has gained approval of a mitigation plan from CWS. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 16 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • CONDITION:Prior to site work, the applicant shall supply the City arborist with a tree protection plan to protect those trees on site that will remain on the site, and insure that said measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795) Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. B. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional. standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 Prvision for the Disabled); 18.360.090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site bylocating the lot in a location that will incorporate a majority of the trees into buffering and screening. No buildings or structures are proposed that will hinder air circulation, natural lighting or prevent fire fighting apparatus from performing their jobs. This criteria has been met. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 18 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has not indicated concern or objection with the proposal. To ensure that the plan addresses crime prevention concerns, the applicant would need to provide a detailed lighting plan to the Tigard Police Department and the Tigard Planning Department. Additionally, the applicant has proposed vegetation that would allow easy observation of activities that are on-going on the site. The crime prevention standards have not been fully met. FINDING: The proposal fails to address lighting as required by the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan, that shows no projection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Bonita Road. The closest stops are located on SW Hall Blvd. and SW 72' Ave. Both stops are greater than 1/4 mile from the subject site, therefore, this standard does not apply. C. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion rtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the T Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local commercial industrial street to have a 50 right-of-way width and a 34-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 19 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER This site lies adjacent to SW Milton Court, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW along this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW Milton Court is improved adjacent to this site, except for street trees. The applicant's plan shows they will plant street trees as a part of their project. The site also lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, a major collector that was fully improved by the City in recent years. Street trees should also be added to the site frontage. The applicant's plan shows they will provide these trees as a part of their project. Access to this site will be provided via SW Milton Court, as direct access to SW Bonita Road is not permitted. Staff discussed with the applicant the need to provide access rights to the Bonita Community Church site so that eventually the existing driveway on SW Bonita Road could be eliminated. The applicant agreed that they should provide an ingress/egress easement to the church. Prior to construction, the applicant shall demonstrate that the ingress/egress easement is recorded. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Sidewalks are present on both SW Milton Court and SW Bonita Road. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Bonita Road with an existing 4-inch lateral provided to the existing house on this parcel. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how they plan to serve the new day school building. Prior to construction, the applicant shall resolve how sewer service will be provided. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage issues for this site to address. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 20 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction. Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows that they will treat the new stormwater onsite and provide 25-year storm detention in a large pipe, before discharging to the existing public stormwater system in SW Milton Court. The overall plan concept is acceptable to Staff, and the detention pipe appears to be adequately sized to accommodate the needs of this site. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of suchbikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. The proposal has frontage on SW Bonita Road, which has existing bike lanes on both sides. There is no need to require any additional right-of-way from this project. This criterion has been satisfied. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. As the bike lanes are already existing, there-is no need to construct additional right-of-way. This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. This criterion does not apply to this proposal. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication; lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 21 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception. to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighsthe benefit of under • - grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this.site. Therefore, this section does not apply. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is an existing 12-inch public water line in SW Milton Court that has plenty of capacity to serve this development. The applicant proposes to tap the main line to provide a domestic service line to the site. No additional public water main extensions are necessary. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to use two Stormwater Management catch basin units to treat the impervious area runoff from this site. The concept is acceptable, but the applicant will need to submit specific calculations to the Engineering Department to verify that two of these units will adequately serve this site. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design enineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 22 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed units from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS rulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the Building division as a part of the site permit review. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. D. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.390.040.B.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The use will be subject to a .Traffic Impact Fee to mitigate impacts to the transportation system. There is no need to require further dedication or improvements of right-of-way around the site as they are already improved to the designated standard. All other improvements are necessary for services to the site. All other impacts have been addressed elsewhere in this report. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division was sent this proposal for review but offered no comments at this time. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this report. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 23 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager/Water Department has reviewed this application and has indicated that a back flow device shall be installed behind the water meter. The project is required to connect to the storm water collection system. All utility work should be shown in drawings and coordinated with the City prior to site work. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has provided the following comments: • The minimum required fire flow is 2173 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) • A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this development. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. The two existing fire hydrants shown on the plans are acceptable to satisfy this requirement. (UFC 903.4) • Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) • Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) • A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) • A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance.99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. City of Tigard Arborist has reviewed this application and has requested that the applicant consider substituting some White Oak trees into the landscape plan in place of some of the Red Maples that have been proposed. City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: The site noise assessment does not address noise from passing trains on the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. It would seem prudent to require testing to know how often or the number of trains that are passing the site and the average duration of the noise from there engines, and horns. He also expressed concerns with the location of the play area with regard to the proximity of the tracks. He suggested that the parking lot be placed between the track and the building to act as a buffer. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and requested that an exterior lighting plan be submitted to the Police Department for review. Long Range Planning Division has reviewed this application, but offered no comments. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 24 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS.OFFICER SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and offered comments and conditions which have been incorporated into the body of this report as part of their preliminary review, and have been required as part of their approval. AT&T has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. Washington County has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. Tualatin Valley Water District, Portland General Electric, Tri-Met, Southern Pacific Railroad, Burlington Northern Railroad, Santa Fe Railroad, and Verizon were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. January 3,2002 PREPARED BY: Brad K Iby DATE Associate Planner 1 ` el4 January 3, 2002 APPROVED BYT Richard Bewers►•rff DATE Planning Man.ger • LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 25 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • I I I CITY of TIGARD Il 6OEOO RAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM \ . VICINITY MAP ....„--- ,Ik* SDR200I -00012 SLR200I -00008 ��� 0:1:0 clitqj o,, I'd s, Iv DNA • MIS200I -00021 n r• dun l t� d• A, — mu.-telials.0111 ��� � �°�0 ���y - LEARNING TREE � DAY SCHOOL 2 SUBJECT II • •, A✓ER � TAX LOTS ���(�� • WY • Ili -cmc \ — ;11111111‘‘ 'il3CIC' � -�, :e TA _ ,R. :11 BONITA RD MIMATt___\ / \ Mill • Lu 111711 rMin / I inc+2 N m •N NE II .•.: Q } c 0 H D c 0 400 800 Feet 1-=505 feet in. m A `— H I Ell > _t. CARDINAL LN 1 iJ1 '�II ci \J City of Tigard Information on this map Is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. „',�� tO 13125 Tigard,SWOR HallBlvd T}A1 , .J (503) 39 9171 1// (503)839-4171 http:/Iwww.ci.tigard.or.ua Community Development • Plot date: Nov 28,2001;C:\magicWIAGIC03.APR r . . . . • . . .J ,„(----- ..\ .. A \\\ I ^ \fir A \ 1 \ \\ Z 9 % \\ • \ o 'vete G \ LOT I \ Z IV GCMG 1191111,10.141061 NNW..1110/1 011 ... 13 f + tll,r/ t RAT Ntd Ioaw � ' \ 1.4,010 ,R1,Iow,CwOcRn is., NVVGV a'MAR YT,..A I / ' ►-vva pp./Li,/,o vn, MILL'own./1...1.11.Lti 1 woo \ 13 9 144•P MO PA04.004 TO 70'x! iii 1 CP •• s n r ,, ye , • iI1 9.. 14. i .o. 00.11i01 \ \ M j �� G woman,row ! '' � NcV 0•1111171 caOAT! ••1OM04LN LoNaC !C!r"I MULL tlT�TtTLwQ gun • RLi LO1oc$ 1 SSS it It di kr 07 • .^-';;.,i MP=Mill I ' - NIda iff . )( 4 IM i \ '\. ! 11 \ ! '111111PALIIIIIP2111\i1A I I I I gyp1,....CIJEAPIANCII .V/11111.0 tw.werowr w • I I I rb MO WV CNAN LNC MCC KV)/TWIT we. AT M•-o•OG net ' SW BONITA ROAD (COUNTY ROAD # 736) MR PRA11.11 m� •.� CITY OF TIGARD SDR2001-000121SLR2001.000081MIS2001.00027 c S1ItDOPMEW1REVEYISf1tPLAN N LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL (Map is not to scale) • \ •• ... % • I LOT 1 S / A A Ile As" • .,/ V.TY., i ) / II \., , PazcelSize: ExistingLot 1-43,546 S.F. Lot 2-66,184 S F. EProposed Lot 1-29,600 S.F. Lot 2•80,139 S.F. 3 Q I o Deed: R \• G RCStriCtlOns: None ,A/{„• O Lar n I t •\ e . C0)..... WPROP08E F AREA AF� AS e.O.% r0 \ AZ -T \ O •o LEGEND • LOT • \ Z9 II � oS :” Z ?to I • 13 TA CCNCRCIT 14• G,Tww / �� I �,J- II \ y • VDSSd YM1114[ / i *.......--• • v3 r 8 YAL Sm / I \ �O ■� IDIS / OO W TALK \ R- roclM • —ON— OAS U1[ - W I"Y J V.I ro�1A ru[ / i��iii.`yjp'��ii'ii!rLii _:_ Tri / ui` ..-.r.»» A a CATV ream IX.FM MAW ttl1rLL=;.. �' NEW ARE •.Fr..�ar ...oma. VGA ;'.: �.•rr +,.; v� .1yc:. '+tt - 4/111W/ /77 40/ SW BONITA ROAD R V R A A 11 q ?I 1 'A1 it SDR2001.00012/SLR2001.00008/MIS2001-00027 cm Of TIGARD • LOT UNADJULOTLINEADJUSNENTSETEPLAN N LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL (Map is not to scale) . JRN. 14.2002 2:30PM TRI COUNTY IND. PK. NO.627 P.2/5 TRY-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND, OREGON 97229 503-643-5756 FAX 503-626-0621 January 11, 2002 City Of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Bllvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 ATTN: Brad Kilby • RE: Comments of City Of Tigard Property Manager Dear Mr. Kilby: We have already addressed and complied with the issues raised by the Tigard Property Manager except as to the location of the playground in relation to the railroad track. Staff has assured us that there are no statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations that would require this to be addressed. Nonetheless,we researched the issue of a possible derailment which might effect the distance of the playground from the railroad track. We have done considerable research pertaining to this question and have concluded that a derailment at this specific location is almost impossible. We have spoken with Chuck Gilbert, head of the Engineering Department for the Portland& Western Railroad which owns the track adjacent to our property, HDR. Oregon, a railroad engineering firm, and the Federal Railroad Administration office in Vancouver, Washington. The result of our due diligence is the following: 1. The recently completed crossing is "state of the art" according to Mr, Gilbert as far as safety is concerned. 2. The track at that location is a continuous welded track with no switches anywhere in the vicinity (many derailments are a result of a malfunction of a switch). Page 1 of 2 JAN. 14.2002 2:30PM TRI COUNTY IND. PK. NO.627 P.3/5 Tigard Letter January 11, 2002 Page 2 of 2 3. A derailment almost never causes a component of the train leave the track more than a distance of 25 feet. 4. The speed limit for trains adjacent to the subject property is 25 miles per hour or less. If a derailment were to occur at that speed, the component of the train leaving the track would travel less than 25 feet from the track. However if there were such a derailment, it is highly doubtful that it would effect the play area on our property since the shortest distance from the play area to the track is 38 feet and the greatest distance from the track is 60 feet. The Federal Railroad Administration web site(enclosed) confirms that in the last 26 years there have been only 10 derailments,no personal injuries and no fatalities as a result of a derailment in Washington County. There was no information available as to any derailments prior to that time causing fatalities. Our present layout for the playground was designed to be in a location most desirable and efficient for construction and use by the Tenant. The location and design meet all the requirements of the City of Tigard as well. Yours truly, Tri-County Industrial Park,Inc, Jac c Steiger Property Administrator enc JSTEIGER WTNWORD\EONITA\TIGARD 1-I 1-a2.LTR JAN. 14.2002 2:30PM TRI COUNTY IND. PK. NO.627 P.4/5 Federal Railroad Administr'tion Page 1 of 2 TRAIN ACCIDENTS BY CAUSE FROM FORM FRA F 6180.54 Selections; Railroad -ALL State - OREGON, County- WASHINGTON Derailment/MAIN /ALL CAUSES Time Frame: Oct 1975 To Oct 2001 MAJOR CAUSE= Equipment Specific causes: Type of Acci- Total dent Reportable Damage Casualty Cnt % Der Amount % Kid Non ' E24C- Ctr plate disengaged from truck 1 10.0 1 47,275 4.3 0 0 E46C- Truck bolster stiff .0 10,0 1 6,000 0.6 0 0 E64C-Worn Flange NE 10,0 1 18,343 1.7I 0 -- Total 3 30.0 M, 71,618 6.6 0 0 MAJOR CAUSE= Human Specific causes: Type of Acci- Total dent Reportable Damage Casualty Cnt % Der _ Amount % Kld Nonf H017- Failure to secure engine- rr empl 10.0 1 700,000 64.3 0 0 -- Total 1 10.0 1 700,000 64.3 0 0 MAJOR CAUSE= Miscellaneous Specific Type of Acci- Total dent Reportable__ Damage Casualty (• M Amount _ % Kid Nonf M201- Load shifted 1.1 10.0 1 3,500 0.3 IEEE M405- Harmonic rock off, etc. 1 10.0 1 13,895 1.3 0 0 -- Total 2 20.0 2 17,395 1.6 0 0 .../broker.exe?_debug=0&_program-cary.inccaus,sas&_service=safety'&root=%2Fcary&rr 1=&rr—1/7/02 JAN. 14.20O2 2:31PM TRI COUNTY IND. PK. NO.627 P.5/5 Federal Railroad AdministrAtion Page 2 of 2 MAJOR CAUSE= Track Specific causes: Type of Acci- • Total dent Reportable Damage Casualt; Cnt % Der Amount % Kid Non T001- Roadbed settled or soft 1 10.0 1 _ 30,000 2.8 0 T102-Cross level track irreg.(not at oints)Ma 10,0 1 202,000 18,6 0 T202- Broken base of rail MB 10,0 1 37,800 J 0 T208- Engine burn fracture 1 10,0 1 _ 29,500 2,7 0 — Total 4 40.0 4 299,300 27,5 0 �,. .../broker.exe?debug=0&_pxogram=cary,inccaus.sas&_service=safety&root%2Fcary&rr1=&rr=1/7/02 (6) If there are four or fewer children of any age in care for 45 minutes or less directly after opening or directly before closing,OAR 414-300-0300(10) does not apply and infants and younger toddlers may be included with older children. The staff shall be teacher- qualified in one of the represented age groups and the staff/child ratio must be 1:4. (a) Each age group must have age appropriate activities,equipment and toys available for use;and (b) If infants or toddlers are part of the multiple age group,a diaper changing area must be located in the room being utilized for care. (7) Any time there are children in care, • (a) There shall be a staff person and one other adult on site. The other adult shall be enrolled in the Criminal History Registry and shall be physically available to be called on by staff,if needed;or (b) There shall be a written plan,approved by CCD,for a second caregiver to be available within 5 minutes for emergencies. The name and telephone number of the emergency back-up shall be known to all staff who work alone. PHYSICAL SETTING 414-300-0140 Indoor Space (1) There shall be a minimum of 35 square feet of indoor activity area per child. Space considered in determining the facility capacity shall be available for use by children at all times,shall be used exclusively for child care during the hours of operation and shall be determined on a room-by-room basis. The following shall not be counted as part of the 35 square feet per child requirement: heating units;storage areas;teachers' desks;large permanent equipment;any space not useable by children. Cribs will be counted as useable space if the space underneath the cribs is accessible to children. (2) A school-age program shall have a minimum of 50 square feet of indoor activity area per child or may have a minimum of 35 square feet of indoor activity area per child if: (a) The children in care have access to a larger gross motor area,either indoor or outdoor,on a daily basis;or (b) The center has a plan,approved by CCD,which addresses how the gross motor needs of children in care will be met. (3) In a room used by more than one group of children not yet attending kindergarten,the area occupied by each group shall be defined by use of portable or permanent room dividers or program equipment that stand above the eye level of the children who use the area. Rooms used only for large group activities (e.g.,eating,napping,large muscle activities)are exempt from this requirement. (4) Storage space shall be available for each child's clothing and personal possessions. (5) Storage space shall be available for play equipment,teaching equipment and supplies, records and files,cots,mats,and cleaning equipment and supplies. 31 414-300-0150 Outdoor Space (1) There shall be an outdoor activity area which the children can reach safely. If an outdoor activity area is not next to the center,or not under the control of the center during hours of operation,it cannot be used without the specific approval of CCD. (2) There shall be at least 75 square feet of outdoor space for each child using the area at one time. In centers where groups of children are scheduled at different times for outdoor play,there shall be 75 square feet times one-third of the center's capacity,if permitted by local zoning regulations. (3) The outside activity area shall: (a) Be suitably surfaced. All pieces of playground equipment shall be surrounded by a resilient surface of an acceptable depth or by rubber mats manufactured for such use,according to standards of the US Consumer Product Safety Commission; (b) Be well drained; (c) Be kept free of litter,solid waste and refuse,ditches,or other conditions presenting a potential hazard;and (d) Be equipped to provide age-appropriate activities for gross motor development. (4) The outdoor activity area of a center serving children not yet attending kindergarten shall be enclosed by a barrier (fence,wall,or building) at least four feet high. Centers with certification in effect on July 15,2001,must comply with a barrier at least three feet high until such time as the existing barrier is replaced. Spacing between vertical slats of a fence shall be no greater than 4 inches. Fences must meet applicable local codes. 414-300-0160 Fire Protection (1) The building,occupant load and means of egress,including the number of exits,exiting distances,doors and exit illumination and signs,shall meet the requirements of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. (2) Rooms used for child care shall not be located above or below the ground floor,except as allowed by the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. (3) Fire Extinguishers (a) There shall be at least one 2A-10BC-rated fire extinguisher in the center; (b) Fire extinguisher(s)shall be placed as recommended by the fire marshal. (4) Smoke Detectors: (a) Smoke detectors shall be installed in all areas where children nap; (b) When the center's capacity is 50 or more,an approved manual fire alarm system shall be provided,as required by the Oregon Structural Specialty Code; (c) Smoke detectors shall be tested each month. (5) Obstructions,including furniture,storage of supplies,or any other items shall not be placed in corridors,stairwells or exit ways. 32 BradleyBradley,,Kilby Learning_Tree Page 1 : From: Brian Rager To: Diane Parke; Kristie Peerman; Shirley Treat Date: 12/26/01 3:39PM Subject: SDR 2001-00012, Learning Tree We've got a little address tweek we need to take care of. Kit would normally resolve this a bit later in the game, but I happened upon it while preparing my comments for Planning. The SDR is currently tied to a wrong address (7455 SW Bonita Road). That address is presently attached to the Bonita Community Church parcel (2S1 12AB, #1600—see address map in Magic). According to P*P parcel info, it was apparently an old address that was at one time used for the Learning Tree site. If you look in P*P, under the parcel for Learning Tree, it shows that 7455 was indeed a "PREY" address. There is an active address for this site, 14422 SW Milton Court. BUT, that one should really not be used either for Learning Tree. Why? Because it is tied to an existing house on the site that will be demo'd. Therefore, we need to assign a NEW address number for Learning Tree. It should be from Milton Court, and it should be even. I propose 14440 SW Milton Court. I suggest the changes be made in P*P (Kristie, can you show Shirley how to do this?). And, we need to make a change to the address map electronically (Diane, did Kit show you how to do this? If so, can you show Shirley?). I believe Kit also would send out a notice for these SDR-type developments when we officially assign an address, but she would not send the notice until after the SDR approval is issued. Shirley, does that sound right to you? We will need to RETIRE the 14422 number in P*P. Let me know if you have questions. Brian D. Rager Development Review Engineer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171, ext. 318 e-mail: brianr@ci.tigard.or.us CC: - Bradley Kilby NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. 412 CITY OF TIGARD Community(DeveThpment j SfiapingA Better Community I CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY JANUARY 14, 2002 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00012 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2001-00027 FILE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL APPLICANT: Jim Waddle OWNER: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Waddle Design/Planning/Architecture Attn: Jack Steiger 1927 NW Kearney Street 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, OR 97209 Portland, OR 97229 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. } ANYONE WISHING TO PRESE WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS F 'OSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR • TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. • II I I I CITU of Ti6NRD nre fFNTF4 II\I1 fl I \//f VICINITY MAP SDR200I-00012 0200I-00008 U ���►�� ' MIS200I-00027 I °V oft � LEARNING TREE ,, 1 SUBJECTDAY SCHOOL I•�I•� „n xeuen Tj TAX LOTS INC; Iu .1.111 I 711 • Ciry fTigud 1 —re. :. tzt LC. uuol Z . TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND,OREGON 97229 OFFICE LINE 503-643-5757 VOICE MAIL 503-643-5756 FAX 503-626-0621 RECEIVED December 5, 2002 DEC 0 6 2002 CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DIVISION City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attn: Sherman Casper RE: Learning Tree Day School/SDR2001-00012/Project Status Report/November 15, 2002 Dear Mr. Casper: I have enclosed a copy of our stormwater maintenance agreement with Stormwater Maintenance, Inc. This satisfies Condition#28 on the Status Re ortreferenced above. Thank you Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. !/r'> Steiger k.6 02 Property Administrator enc JSTEIGER WIN WORD\BONITAICASPER 12-2-5-02.LTR 12/05/2002 09: 04 3 - PAGE 02 11/22/2002 13:07 3 PAGE 82 r_____�,161... ,� ' • _ 6:T Ge-ri• ..F , eOMe,CAIN,IV SHINE. Meviat Agreement raIWtrlrrNr 1228 NE Airport WAy Portland,OR 97220 SProiottrIbM: Tarot T:800.50.1667F:eoa561.1311 ISM Lasering Tree IFroni: 11/22/2002 To: 11/22/2003, Ownar_ - - a Nemo Ta County Industrial Park Inc • I Coma Jack Ste*er Meow I z A�ogs a'eeuel7ax FumOs+a _ (503)643-5757 1(503)626-0621 (City of Tigard sweet I Ma3le;Adttteog 301 NW Murray Blvd Portland,OR97229 sky Ade.= 14440 SW Milton Ct. Tigard,OR Sold Number. %ill Sim Caviares Medi Annul Mamma=Emanate: 2903.01 CO-SD 1 Perlite .250.00 Saw Numbs Vault Sista Cavidgee Med Type! Aaoval Mea<tenaaee ESemav: 2903.02 Ce-S I Pel1ite 25L.OQ • • Total Estimated Maintenance Cost 5500.00 -Seruntie fbrii ry =tor,=pas prreemacaws. Stormwater Management,lac.(SMI)does not establish credit accounts for contracts totsling$1,000 or less.SMI will require payment prior to preforming maintenance services SMI accepts Visa and Mastercard- Services provided by Stormwater Management,Inc: _ , 1.Mid-season inspection:test/evaluate the filter media for hazardous constituents, (regional composite annually) 2.Evaluate the condition of mechanical filter components. 3.Remove and replace exhausted cartridges and remove accumulated sediment from the vault as necessary. 4.Notify regulatory agency and owner,via written confirmation,that maintenance has been preformed. • Service not provided by Stormwater Management,Inc: I.Maintenance of other stormwater treatment devices or appurtenances,except as noted in Attachment A if applicable. NOTE:ti'be owner is encouraged to maintain these facilities as needed. • The services to be preformed and the related charges have been based upon the assumption of unrestricted access, reasonable sedimentation loading, dry conditions, non-hazardous materials and no inappropriate discharges. Work arising from the presence of regulated materials in excess of • permitted levels will he billed es extra services.Regulated materials include but are not limited to;Pesticides,Herbicides,Insecticides, Solvents, Fuels, Strong Acids or Bases, Free Oils and/or Greases.Maintenance services will be performed dining the dry months (typically July through September)_ This contact must be signed and returned no later than May 31st to guarantee lmintcnanec in the=Sent calendar year_Price not to exceed estimate without prior approval from owner. This agreement it subtm.,,to and includes the Service Agreement Terms and Carditions prig op 4lM reverse side of tiss she= ion �De tratcdtryaierrss • r .e Contact -_— o ...V.. ...---> SitePbane No _.........:1 _ fn isT r�a legally binding ceoieuer.Smrmnarer management lac.agrees to provide and Cummer agrees ao accept the specified services. CUSTOMER . -r.-;-"GO 4b� ,{ b2.4.141STO W.4T Ma Na GEM ,INC. TA-t LeirresentYave.Signature ' '-<-&. Ste, t 3fra- 124570 2. Meme .ante prig) Dm i A � c� 2t�e-D'� WI. .- Sipmeur: . Date . • • 12/5!2002 09:04 3 • PAGE 03 ;1/22/2002 13:07 3 mater ria H SERVICE AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS • tated herein. rprovisiont I 'S ces an SMI is ons hsslyave et been p viousl accepted by Buyer, Buyers receipt of services under thn OWNER's acceptance of stal'S terms and conditions as iss Agrees the Providedeerneht that SNIPS terms and es termsons have not been previously this quotation shall become the binding agreement constitutesaacceptancei of these and conditions. Upon asap s T, and that paNFR rties. OWNER certifies that it has examined, and is fully and conditions.farnalar with lAdditional or di�renttermterms and conditions of is of OWNER'S purcha e a der or enters into this agreement with full knowledge of said to other form of acceptance or any Other form of OWNER are rejected in advance and shall not become a part hereof. 1. Period of Service: Storrnwater Management, Inc_ (SMI)will commence work within the standard maintenance cycle outlined by the executed Agreement and will proceed with said work in a diligent manner until completion. SMI will not be responsible for delaysbfocauseen by factors beyond SMI's control and will not be responsible for delays caused by factors which could not reasonably have een rese at the time this Agreement was executed. ira6on of the initial term 2. Term of Agreement The term of Agreement shall be automatically renewed for like terms after the exp to initial n m hereof, unless eerier party gives written notice at least 60 days prior to date of termination via certified mail_ Upon of agreement,any outstanding invoices and/or unbilled balances for services actually performed will be immediately due and payable. 3. Terms of Payment: Fees for Services will be blied upon completion of work performed. If OWNER objects to any invoice submiied invoice. If ER by make ar a shall saedSMe•Sr in es andli,g pensesrs within refor,within fourteen days thirty days of the date on thethe invoice. the amounts not paid -vial lleee :o sid •d, due. 'due SMI fore P considered past due.A delinquency charge of 1.5°lo per month shall be added to the past due amount, or such lesser amount es.shall equal the maximum rate allowed by law, and in addition,SMS may suspend services under this Agreement tntiowi without n liability indr delpr for• remain result therefrom, upon delivery of written notice of pn landing p stor other adys, SWges mawhich may o�ltstanding past sixty days, SW may pursue all legal and equitable remedies to collect outstanding balances owned to SMI, OWNER agrees to pay all reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection incurred by SMI thereof,whether or not a lawsuit is instituted_ 4. a the rice annually to reflect Increases in the Federal Consumer Price In ex(C0). it is Changes and Cost Iasis in the: SMl may adjustp require an adjustment to the price and SMI reserves the d to is also possible that Increases in cost of media disposal may 1 e such increases i heosdteaperformed. that are not related to an he CPI or disposal costs.n -ce of which shall begve aaysdvapeVNER,are stthe approval of the aNER S. ' Payments in Event of Termination: In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to the expiration of the then current ren,SM�te will l be compensated for services performed under this Agreement to the date of termination in accordance with the above Term Ag and Terms of Payment provisions_ • 6. Standard of Performance:SMI shall perforin its services in accordance with generally accepted standards presently aintained by other practicing professionals engaged in the same type of work in the general location of the Project. SMI makes no o er warranty. expressed or implied, and SMI hereby disclaims ail other warranties,express or implied,including implied warranties of me • antabiltty or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall SMi be liable for cost of procurement of substitute services,goods,loss of profits,or for any other special, consequential,or incidental damages,however caused. ;1 7. Limitation of Liability: SMI'S total liability for any and all losses and damages arising out of any and all causes whatso-ver including, without limitation, defects in services supplied under this Agreement or on account of any injury or damage to persons •r property or arising out of any error,omission or professional negligence shall in no event exceed - =• .•j ..- rs _ a tai 1 I J tw,u.v a,,r,• e• f PotirAit. Tier *eyes. •S hal/ se, 1rss.amerseeef-aesfees-Isesesteeleetelsiesseser-Iseees.441 d a.3 cis iertsa-E, eb+suev[d u4. S . fec ft LPL ti eira- t ft. Attorney's Fees and Expenses: In the event suit or action is instituted to enforce any of the.terms or conditions of this Agreement the losing party shall pay to the prevailing party, in addition to the costs and disbursements allowed by statutes, such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees in such suit or action,in both trial court and appellate courts. 9. Waiver: No waiver of a breach of any covenant, term or condition of this Agreement shall be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach of the same or any other covenant,term or condition or a waiver of the covenant,term or condition itself. 10. Controlling Law, Jurisdiction and Venue: All disputes in any way relating to, arising under, connected with or incident tY this agreement shell be litigated, if at all, solely and exclusively in the State Circuit Court of Oregon for the County of Multnomah ar, if • _ppl'=c ble ,lase Federal District Court for the Disaiete O.e oet.and if., essaty.their respective corresporr ng annetieta rcfurts r=a h party agrees to forebear from filing a claim in any other county or jurisdiction and expressly submits itself to the parsonai ju ied;dui„iif'thc• . State of Oregon. The performance and construction of this Agreement shall be governed by the substantive laws of the State of Oregon without retard to conflict of law provisions. 11. Successors and Assigns: The covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the partners, heirs, personal representatives and assigns of the parties hereto. Neither OWNER !tor SW acral assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or irrtereat In this Agreement without the written consent of the other. Nothing contained in this. paragraph shall prevent SMI from employing such independent professional associates and consultants,as SMi may deem appropriate lc assist in the performance of services hereunder. , TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND, OREGON 97229 OFFICE LINE 503-643-5757 VOICE MAIL 503-643-5756 FAX 503- 626-0621 November 25, 2002 City of Tigard VIA FAX & US MAIL 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 503-598-1960 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attn: Sherman Casper RE: Learning Tree Day School/SDR2001-00012/Project Status Report/November 15, 2002 Dear Mr. Casper: I have enclosed a verification of compliance letter from Martin Schott of Schott & Associates for 23.0 CWS Condition Compliance. Heidi Berg of Cleanwater Services is in the process of preparing the same for her agency and I have requested that she send a copy to you and Brian Rager. Thank you Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. teiger Property Administrator enc JSTEIGER WINWORD\BONITA\CASPER 11-25-02 LTR 11/22/2002 19: 16 5038293874 SCHOTT AND ASSOC PAGE 01 •■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • a, SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES Ecologists & Wetland Specialists \ 11977.S. Toliver Rd. • Molalla,OR 97038• (503)829-6318 • FAX(503)829-3874 • S &A# 1520 November 22, 2002 Jack.Steiger. 301 NW Murry s'< Portland, OR.97229 Re: Buffer Enhancement Plan Dear Jack: I inspected the buffer.mitigation area yesterday. I found it was implemented properly, and the trees and shrubs were doing great. All the trees and shrubs had been staked and • - netted to protect them from beavers and nutria. Sincerely, • Martin R. Schott, Ph.D. • i:4 a Ir• l } S.. 1% NOV.25.2002 2:23PM TRI COUNTY IND. PK. NO.162 P. 1/3 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. INFORMATION PAGE FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION 1_ �Q TO: Sr 1 &Vv'1 Gig •l .q e FROM: Jack Steiger Q" $ p� c 301 N.W, MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97229 (503) 643-5757 (direct line) (503) 643-5756 (voice mail) (503) 626-0621 (FAX NUMBER) r RE: V' 't Ga�10t. C7 C0wt t 1�QM-� lG r vt 5 cC,a ff" - ,4 s/4 gre9 G. S NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: TRANSMISSION DATE: J IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES OF THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL THE SENDER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. TRANSMITTING FROM FAX NUMBER: 503/626-0621 TRANSMITTING TO FAX NUMBER: ‘05- This message is intended only for the use of the Individual or entity to which It Is addressed and may contain information that Is privileged,confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the Intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please not:fy us immediately by telephone,end return the original message to us at the above address via the U.5.Postal Service. Thank you. MRVII FORMS\ELAN K.FAX NOV.25.2002 2:24PM TRI COUNTY IND. PK. NO.162 P.2/3 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK,INC. 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND, OREGON 97229 OFFICE LINE 503-643-5757 VOICE MAIL 503-643-5756 FAX 503- 626-0621 November 25, 2002 City of Tigard VIA FAX&US MAIL 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 503-598-1960 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attn: Sherman Casper RE: Learning Tree Day School/SDR2001-00012/Project Status Report/November 15, 2002 Meati Mr. Casper: I I I have enclosed a verification of compliance letter from Martin Schott of Schott& Associates fo 23.0;CWS Condition Compliance. Heidi Berg of Cleanwater Services is in the process of preparing the same for her agency and I have(requested that she send a copy to you and Brian Rager. That you Tri-dounty Industrial Park, Inc. &33C.LL....#1 iger Property Administrator enc JSTEIOER WINWORDVIONITA\CASPER 11-25-02,LTR 11NOV.25._20029:_ :24PI 0382TRI COUNTY IND. PK. SCHOTT AND ASSOC N0.162 P.3i3 ®l SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES ' ' Ecologists &.Wetland,Speclalists ' 11977.8.Tolivar Rd. • ;Molalla,OR 97038• (503)819-6318 • FAX(503)8294814 , ' . ' . S &A## 1520' ' . ' November 22, 2002 )aek.Steiger , 301 NW Murry , ' o Portland,OR:97229 . Re: Buffer Enhancement Plan ' • Dear Tack: I inspected the buffer Mitigation area yesterday. I found it was implemented properly, . and the,trees and shrubs were doing great. All the trees and shrubs had been staked and ' • netted to protect-diem from beavers and nutria. • ' Sincerely, Martin R. Schott, Ph.D. ' 05/17/2002 Conditions I 'ociated with Case #: SDR2/1-00012 4:35:59 PM - Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0041 H2O QUAL FAC INSTALLED ON SITE 0 Met 03/06/200 BDR 03/06/2002 BDR 15.The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Brian Rager)for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 0001 CONDITION DELETED 0 Met 02/07/200 BDR 02/07/2002 BLW 16. Condition#16 deleted per Final Order of Hearings Officer dated January 21,2002. 0001 CHAIN LINK FENCE SLATS 0 Met 04/01/200 BMK 04/01/2002 BMK 17.The applicant shall install vertical slats into the chain link fence to screen the enclosure that is shown on the site plan. 0001 PARKING LOT STRIPING 0 Not Met BMK 02/07/2002 BLW 18. Prior to final occupancy,the parking lot shall be striped in accordance with the TDC Chapter 18.765. 0001 PARKING LOT WHEEL STOPS 0 Not Met BMK 02/07/2002 BLW 19. Prior to final occupancy,wheel stops shall be provided for all parking areas as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. 0001 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES 0 Not Met BMK 02/07/2002 BLW 20. Pursuant to TDC Chapter 18.765,the applicant shall provide 8 bicycle parking spaces for the site prior to final occupancy. 0001 100-YR FLOODPLAIN CERT 0 Not Met BMK 02/07/2002 BLW 21. Prior to any site work,the applicant shall provide certification from a registered professional engineer that the proposed encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and will not result in any increase in flood levels or water surface elevation during the base(100-year)flood. [Condition#21 amended per Final Order of Hearings Officer dated January 21,20021 • 0001 USACOE&DSL APPROVAL 0 Met 04/01/200 BMK 04/01/2002 BMK 22. Prior to site work,the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the US Army Corps of Engineers(USACOE)and the Oregon Division of State Lands(ODSL)that indicates the proposal does not need their approval or that such approval has been granted. [Condition#22 amended per Final Order of Hearings Officer dated January 21,20021 0001 CWS CONDITION COMPLIANCE 0 Not Met BMK 02/07/2002 BLW 23.The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the CWS service provider letter and submit verification of compliance from both CWS and the projects qualified consultant from Schott&Associates. 0100 TREE PROTECTION FOR PRESERVATION 0 Met BMK 05/17/2002 BMK 24. Prior to site work,the applicant shall supply the City arborist with a tree protection plan to protect those trees on site that will remain on the site, and insure that said measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction.NO LONGER NEEDED THE APPLICANT HAS DECIDED TO REMOVE THE LARGE TREE DUE TO ITS LOCATION WITHIN THE REQUIRED ACCESS. 0046 LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS: 0 Met 05/17/200 BMK 05/17/2002 BMK 25. Prior to site work,the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan,that shows no projection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). 0001 ROW WORK COMPLTN/APPRVL 0 Not Met BDR 02/07/2002 BLW 26. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way(or public easement)and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 0001 CWS COMP-H2O FACILITY INSPECTION 0 Not Met BDR 02/07/2002 BLW 27.To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection,the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 0001 STORMWATER MAINT AGRMNT REQRMNT 0 Not Met BDR 02/07/2002 BLW 28. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management,or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer,for the proposed onsite storm water treatment units. Page 2 of 2 }•, X ...------- 1 711 / - 1 • -- 1 ‘‹. ----- \ 1 • _ , \ 'A i \ '• Jo i \>>, ; s, ; ,^A:•: 3 i:,;' % ,. ,i,..... '.. t , ' ve•Wi..* tV. . ,t • > 1 s,s, ....,..-"1 . ,.,. • ','• 1 . ;;; • NS...) 1 i / i1 —„..a...—....-----.--- i ! f i NA ,---. o 9 2 9 2 S E. . . , ;f 74. • , , , ‘,! ...., ;.(,, . .•• i %., • , / ,. 7 i , • . . ,,,, , I i ‘ f o - • n . .1 . i 1 \ L .} ,•-z-', e" .; i . . • . 1• ? ;. * GAF \ v,,,,,,,,,/,‘ ra, . . • \ \',‘ . r• \ i ft. li ‘ • ; \ a : ,,.., •\ WETLANDS :BOUNDARY , i i 1 1 , ‹...1 / x , : ...„. . 1 \ \ . • • • i . 100 YEAR FL OD PLAIN! ELEVATION _. ,R. .4./' 7 IS EQUAL TO APPROXIMATELY 138,0D. ,, 8 =‘,..i. i •. ...., • I 1 , , . GRADING HA BEEN DESIGNED TO i PkESERVE , j THE FLOOD LAIN STORAGE FUNCTION OF I, x . • ..... 1. • 1 1/2'. • /THE SITE T PREVENTANCREASED FLOOD 1 '. \ \ ,,,•<, • \''' I I ELEVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DEVIATE FROM THE PLANS (BELOW 138.00 i k i . WITH 07 NOTIFYING/THE ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT • ., i , ' 7' ) l''' 07 " TwrENRDE \ -1 f 1 1„,k i orN 1 sHGRRETAININGADE1 sWABLELL(41 SIDEWALK SEE DETAIL 10/C4.0'k \ . • ; 4 , % .7 : , . il --- i1/2 1 t74, .„—.1.._ 1 - . . ,. 140.62 1 140.44 140.72 / i *- . 1 -z...„. - flzS9.12.TE. PROPERTY/LINE \---) 141.12 ...... i ? --- am "."." -1,tignoLEN:m 4m......m.am • a. .0..-.. ., im . . i 41.18 \ I i• s i ..MIMI: i ....... .', e i ...I--- ' 5% Nbc , 11 /i/ i 1140.30 ,..., \ MAX .... . ., ii 1 1 \ I 1 , 4 / e i ('..i% 136.75 '-, N ;b:b .L..1 \ ' 1 ' Is. 1/4; • .4---7_...L. I __,_.i v i 1136.47 i / -.‘ 'fa ,.:3 / 1 4 140.40 i ::•..• :.*....:14 F . . 7 \I I / ; , i 136.95 ../ 14044 I 4:. \ I I 136.58IIIIII Ili. 'X'f• • . . / - ibt.\ ' A 1::: • \-,-,, * .. ,.,-. .': .' , \ 'ili, 7'-'-'' 31 0 I .i. Nr, . : ..., : , • i 1141.46 i . 1 V7 ns ..,,., 5 ,s...77Th ,„2,1.-2., .,1 1 •'`'. ( i I . ..-:,/ 1'41 '. , r'D (CrIP , ' !.1, __ ------, = -------------- li. ' —111.1."111."1-MI ;A i L� i At RL 4 Q,.- n i ? O IE'AM' ' VA Lc/3 - n ° TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. � ff 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. Y�� ® VS PORTLAND, OREGON 91229 503-643-5151 DIRECT LINE v. 503-643-5156 VOICE MAIL 503-626-0621 FAX CONTACT: JACK STEIGER W WADDLE DESIGN-PLANNING-ARCHITECTURE CCCC 1921 N.W. KEARNEY STREET cNi 4=0U PORTLAND, OREGON 91209 503-221-2003 W F— o 1 503-221-1109 FAX *lilt _ CONTACT: JIM WADDLE U ..r6.31 CONLEE ENGINEERS, INC IX Q. 1308 SW BERTHA BLVD PORTLAND, OREGON 91219 503-244-0519liqsc....D --g z N 503-244-1023 FAX Z CONTACT: CHUCK CONLEE z Q v� GROUP MACKENZIE Y c� 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET r^ PORTLAND, OREGON 91201 z05 503-224-9510N 503-228-1285 FAX os CONTACT: BOB FRENTRESS CD W KAUFMAN HOMES, INC. D_ 1295 BAXTER RP. SE SALEM, OREGON 91306 I-503-310-8390 CITY OF TIGARD 1-503-310-2131 FAX Approved CONTACT: DEAN KAUFMAN Conditionally Approved ( ): O For only the w�o a described in: PERMIT NO..?�`/Z00 Z —0000!e See Letter to: Follow ( ): O Attach O Job ••• ,-'s' ' DRAWINGS Sy: • Date: ,ijZ/ate ° s" ti) f— o _L- ER SHEET - SITE PLAN {— co )R PLAN - SCHEDULES )1 ,.. _j EGT1=D CEILING PLAN t ER / TELEPHONE 4 DATA PLAN E 0 :RIOR ELEVATIONS 4 BUILDING SECTIONS 0 t. t..ntirn.ic, r‘ Hi April 1, 2002 Note to File: Kathryn Harris verified by telephone conversation on March 19, 2002 that since there was no physical encroachment into the Wetland, approval would not be required from the US Army Corps of Engineers. On March 19, 2002, Paul Kauffman, Senior Cartographer for Washington County, verified by telephone conversation that the lots were consolidated for this project pursuant to condition #3. Brad Kilby Mar-07-02 10 : 36A WADDLE DESIGN 503 221 1709 P .01 -, . Crda7e DESIGN / PLANNING / ARCHITECTURE. 1927 NW Kearney Street Portland, Oregon 97209 TEL: 503/221-2003 FAX: 503/221-1709 e-mail; wdpa 0 teleport.com FAX COVERSHEET TO: Jack Steiger COMPANY: Tri County Industrial Park, Inc. FAX: 503 626 0621 DATE: 3/07/2002 FROM: Jim Waddle RE: Learning Tree Day Care Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 Message: Jack: I discussed the parking layout with Brad Kilby and we agreed that the only adjustment to be made is to show the bumper overhang as 3 feet instead of 2 feet. The dimensions to the physical construction elements remain unchanged. I am sending Brad a copy of this fax to correct the issue for his records. Thanks! I i ' , f. H. Waddle, Architect COPIES: Brad Kilby, City of Tigard ORIGINALS: [ ] Will be sent via Regular Mail. [ ] Will be sent via [xx ] Will NOT be sent. OPERATOR: If this transmission does not come through properly or there are missing pages, please notify us immediately for re-transmission. If this fax was received in error, please notify us immediately. Thank you. Mar-07-02 10: 36A WADDLE DESIGN 503 221 1709 P . 02 / .ilii• ✓►�.v� ' °-' SLATS t0 PRC •PROPOSED PROPERTY L INE • SCREENING_ I t' d:7.5.7-.....: : I . . T�' -_ '-G `_ .-._ -.T. ---milMliii _ - - _ _ . 3E \.� 6" CURB--'-'1 L.. J e• 1 ' ‘ (WHEELSTOP) .1._ • . '-:":. •'f a Ir LIGI-R - .- l\ It.i_ - y _ _ t _ r LINE OF ---� . -- e a. -. BUMPER 1... --' • I ■ 1 . W OVERHANCs -4 I\ • 1 36" TYPA -- 7tudtkikk . . rs'j . .....6 II cuR5 .,---1. --: -.IR m 5 _ , „__• ' - tt! -LINE 01= Du / s?_E11riiip;11 -INSTAL DRNANG BIKE p Rab`--BITER I� Qr° ' -4.--Wil! 6 INK.? LABEL SPACE 2 i "RESERVED FOR '� '4 -6' WIC VAN ' -r • I PROVIDE PAVEMENT r_,- I I-IC R, STRIPING; 3" WIDE a•- t WHITE. IN PATTERN Iii..7... - i I1 122 MF AND LOCATIONS _ FLABvsLRllw SNOWN 1:1281 I• . s - .. .. .. ?8' 8' 1 i..j.v © _ L__.___.. b' i .•,...._ _ _. _. ________________ r ___ ___ ___ 7., .„ LEARNING TREE 019addi DAY SC4OOL R2_A __DESIGN��PLANNING ARCHITECTURE REVISION: BUMPER OVERHANG SCALE: 1"■20'- )' REFERENCE: ALI SITE PLAN DATE: 3/1/02 A CITY OF TIGARD Community Development MEMORANDUMShap �glu Better CoCITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 Fax 684-7297 TO: Daryl Jones FROM: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner DATE: March 6, 2002 SUBJECT: Learning Tree Day Care Center SLR 0061 2_ The Fanno Creek Watershed Flood Insurance Restudy map dated March 20, 2000 indicates that the Base Flood Elevation for the site is 138 feet. 3c aoo r — OCOV . (V -cs Can3i-1-',OK1 ginr .2/..yo; p *R *I *D * E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 (503)625-6177 City of Tigard I have reviewed the most recent designs for the solid waste and recycling enclosure for The Learning Tree, located on SW Milton Ct.,and feel that it will work for our needs of access. The drawings that are dated 2/13/2002 show sufficient room and clearance in the enclosure to enable our company to empty the dumpsters adequately. Thank you for allowing us to be a part of the review process. Sincerely, Mike Leichner Pride Disposal Company 4 Printed on 100%recycled paper. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN IT TO THE CITY AT THE ADDRESS BELOW, ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE SITE. City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 In the Matter of the Proposed Land Use Applications for: Land Use File Nos.: J D R dco l ode)iZ Land Use File Name: `eavrt,r?y, .%reE l Seco( I, Si�wles Nac kwe-a , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a land use proposal affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) IF no addre s(s) and/or n�¢ tax lot(s) currently registered) Cor ,v- Yh iii-, coal a,r,d [ion i �r-k {X oael , and did personally post notice of the Public Hearing on the proposed land use application(s) by means of weatherproof posting in the general vicinity of the affected territory, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 74'. day of f e.b ru dv 1 , 20 o 2-. RECEIVED FEB - 7 1001 v nature of Person Who Performed Posting CITY OF TIGARD (In the presence of the Notary) PLANNING/ENGINEERING (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF W`i° cn ) County of \ s livyt ) ss. tie. r Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of 41. , 20 6,2— . U �l , OFIICIALSEAL t , . WILLIAM NORMAN BERGER JR. 4, NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �ZG�-�--� `��'.� COMMISSION NO. 322554 I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 14,2003A-- 1T OTARY PUBLIC OF OR ON /- My Commission Expires: yAph� L 3 h:Uogin\patty\masters\affidavit of posting for a public hearing.doc Public Hearing regarding the proposed Learning Tree Day School Tigard City Hall January 14th, 2002 7 : 00 P . M . DEVELOPMEIE £ 339 W. Main St. . ' conitRuction Hillsboro, Oregon 97123-3947 �C�ViCE � inc. (503) 648-4959 FAX: (503) 640-9385 GETS Ccs(^, Loth RECEIVED PLANNING March 22, 2002 � r f'1A' 2 5 2002 Job# 0202020 Cl;Y Cr i iGARD Mr. Brad Kilby City Of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR. 97223 Re: Lot 1, Bonita Industrial Park Brad, Please be advised that I turned the record of survey in to the Washington County Surveyors office today. The surveys go through a review process before the are actually filed. The time frame for this can vary depending on their work load. Sincerely, /e/-le-1.- /1/ John M. Peterson P.L.S. cc Jack Steiger Subdivisions • Planning • Design • L.I.D.s • Surveying • Mapping MI% DEVELO?���` 339 W. Main St. C0n1,L1uCLo®n Hillsboro, Oregon 97123-3947 ,E ViCE,, 11f C. (503) 6484959 FAX: (503) 640-9385 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: FOR: TRI COUNTY DATE: MARCH 8, 2002 LOCATION: JOB NUMBER: 0202020 FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY TRACT A FOR USE ON LEGAL INSTRUMENT A PORTION OF LOT 1, "BONITA INDUSTRIAL PARK" A PLAT OF RECORD IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SAID PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE MOST WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, WHICH POINT BEARS NORTH 04°20'02" WEST 41.46 FEET FROM THE MOST WESTERLY SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SW MILTON DRIVE, AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 89°17'03" EAST 251.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 135.02 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 1736.73 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13°59'09" EAST 134.98 FEET), THENCE SOUTH 89°17'02" WEST 229.20 FEET, NORTH 01°09'54" WEST 90.00 FEET, SOUTH 89°17'03" WEST 50.00 FEET, SOUTH 01°09'54" EAST 7.20 FEET AND 48.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 505.00 FOOT RADIUS NONTANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 03°55'34" WEST 48.65 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 30369 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DESCRIPTION IS TO ACCOMPLISH A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. Subdivisions 0 Planning • Design • L.I.D.s • Surveying • Mapping January 30, 2002 Note to File: E-mail from Colin McClaren partially satisfies condition#22 of the approval, and may completely satisfy the condition according to a telephone conversation I had with Kathryn Harris from the US Army Corps of Engineers today. Brad Ki Bradley Kilby-Tri-Counties Project Page From: MACLAREN Colin <colin.maclaren@dsl.state.or.us> To: "bradley@ci.tigard.or.us- <bradley@ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 1/30/02 11:32AM Subject: Tri-Counties Project Hello Bradley, This email is to address wetland permit issues for the above referenced site, located on tax lots 1900, 1901, and 2000, Section 2S, Range 1W, Section 12. Based on my discussion with Jack Steiger this morning, and on DSL's concurrence with the wetland delineation prepared for the site, DSL would not require a Joint Removal/Fill permit application because no wetland resources are affected by the proposed project. Should changes to the project affect wetlands, a permit may be necessary. Let me know if you have any questions or wish for further information. Cheers, Colin cc. Jack Steiger CC: MACLAREN Colin <colin.maclaren@dsl.state.or.us>, "'murrayoffice3116@aol.com"' <murrayoffice3116@aol.com> Request For Comments REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ,,„A. Ali IIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Gary Tampella,Building Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JAN 1 5 200a STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x3881 CITY OF TiGARD Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR]2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT[MIS)2001-00027 LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses aortion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The -L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. — Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — "i•--;01,4 l,->% Lam..,X-eZ_ (Please provide the folThwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(s): I • �1 •1'1' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Sherman Casper,Permit Coordinator/Community Development Department HtCE D AN ING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division 0 3 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner[x3881 Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: [503)684-7291 Ci r u,itGjRO SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR)2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT[MIS)2001-00027 LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses aortion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PCease provide the folli wing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): •' DATE: Jan 2, 2002 PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT TITLE: Learning Tree Day School COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO.ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $226.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 57.00 OFFICE $207.00 This is an Estimate based on included calculations INDUSTRIAL $217.00 X INSTITUTIONAL $ 94.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY 565 Day Care Center TRIP RATE 67 WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE 6.15 BASIS: Applicant proposed construction of a new 6,480 Sq. Ft. Day Care CALCULATIONS: Wk day Wk end RATE . TIF = ( (Avq. trips X 5) + ( Avq. trips X 2) X T.G.S.F. ) — Credit X PER TRIP 7 $29,278 = (( 67 X 5) + (6.15 X 2) X 6.480) —10 X $94 7 TRANSIST AMT. $5,287 = 311 =TRIP GEN X$17 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 311 FEE: $29,278 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: 10 trip credits assumed for demo of one SF dwelling ROAD AMT. $23,991 • TRANSIT AMT. $5,287 PREPARED BY: S.S. Casper I:TI FWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: December 27, 2001 TO: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2001-00012, Learning Tree Day School Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local commercial industrial street to have a 50 right-of-way width and a 34- foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Milton Court, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW along this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW Milton Court is improved adjacent to this site, except for street trees. The applicant's plan shows they will plant street trees as a part of their project. The site also lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, a major collector that was fully improved by the City in recent years. Street trees should also be added to the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 1 site frontage. The applicant's plan shows they will provide these trees as a part of their project. Access to this site will be provided via SW Milton Court, as direct access to SW Bonita Road is not permitted. Staff discussed with the applicant the need to provide access rights to the Bonita Community Church site so that eventually the existing driveway on SW Bonita Road could be eliminated. The applicant agreed that they should provide an ingress/egress easement to the church. Prior to construction, the applicant shall demonstrate that the ingress/egress easement is recorded. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Sidewalks are present on both SW Milton Court and SW Bonita Road. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Bonita Road with an existing 4- inch lateral provided to the existing house on this parcel. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how they plan to serve the new day school building. Prior to construction, the applicant shall resolve how sewer service will be provided. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 2 outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage issues for this site to address. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an'existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows that they will treat the new stormwater onsite and provide 25-year storm detention in a large pipe, before discharging to the existing public stormwater system in SW Milton Court. The overall plan concept is acceptable to Staff, and the detention pipe appears to be adequately sized to accommodate the needs of this site. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. PLANNING Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 3 such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. PLANNING Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. PLANNING Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 4 There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site. Therefore, this section does not apply. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is an existing 12-inch public water line in SW Milton Court that has plenty of capacity to serve this development. The applicant proposes to tap the main line to provide a domestic service line to the site. No additional public water main extensions are necessary. Storm Water Quality: • The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65.percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from. newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to use two Stormwater Management catch basin units to treat the impervious area runoff from this site. The concept is acceptable, but the applicant will need to submit specific calculations to the Engineering Department to verify that two of these units will adequately serve this site. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 5 Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. The proposed units from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company 'that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the Building division as a part of the site permit review. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 6 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the installation of the new concrete driveway on SW Milton Court, and any other work in the public ROW. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the 'individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will plant street trees along the frontages of SW Milton Court and SW Bonita Road. The trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2 inches and the species and the City Engineer and City Forester shall approve location. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate how they will provide sanitary sewer service to the new building. Staffs preference would be for the applicant to utilize the existing 4-inch service line that serves the existing home, provided the line size will meet Uniform Plumbing Code standards. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services 'Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 7 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have granted an ingress/egress easement to the Bonita Community Church parcel (2S1 12AB, #1600), for access to SW Milton Court. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment units. \\1ig333\usr\depts\eng\brianr\comments\sdr\sdr2001-00012.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree PAGE 8 12/21/01 13:33 FAX 503 640 3525 CLEAN WATER SERVICES Z001 CleanWater Services Our commitment is clear. MEMORANDUM • DATE: Dece r 21, 01 FROM: e e , Clean Water Services (District) TO: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner • SUBJECT: Learning Tree Day Care STORM SEWER Engineer must verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent: properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O No. 00-7. . Site is within Fanno Creek Drainage Master Planned Area, on Site storniwater Detention is required. A hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary to justify release rate. WATER QUALITY Developer shall provide a water quality facility to treat the new :impervious;surface being constructed as part of this development. SENST'TTVE AREA Applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in Clean Water Services' Service Provider letter#888, dated October 15, 2001. Prior to any Occupancy Permit for any building on the site, the applicant's Environmental Consultant shall submit a "Compliance Rep a rt" (signed inspection notes)to the District verifying that the mitigation required has been comph:ted_ FLOODPLAIN Mitigation Site may contain flood plain/flood way designations. Grading within the flood plain/flood way shall be done in such a manner as to preserve the flood staiage and flood conveying area without effecting any upstream or downstream properties i,r. accordance with R&O No. 00-7 EROSION CONTROL A 1200-C Joint Erosion Control Permit may be required for theli mitigation,(lite. I I i Po -It"Fax Niote 76., I Cat Post-It" e 2-'L� Agest � To ^ 7.1 From � u CC comeo uiuk»ylg c, v , Phone# �5 � Phone#8 Fag ft VC/. aci I F.# %t.�/D 3SZ5 155 N First Avenue,Suite 270• Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 � Phone: (503)846-8621 • Fax: (503)846-3525•www.cltanwaterservices.org Bradley Kilby- Learning Tree Day Schou' '-+c Page 1 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION December 7,2001 Brad Kilby,Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: SDR 2001-00012 Learning Tree Day School Dear Brad, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 2173 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this development. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. The two existing fire hydrants shown on the plans are acceptable to satisfy this requirement. (UFC 903.4) 3. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line,then assume a centerline,and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 4. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec.8704) 5. A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) 6. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F,the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet,follow this link: httu://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/new construction.htm Please contact me at(503)612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court,Suite 101•Tualatin,Oregon f'iin•oTell.(503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com q. Y REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Department RECEIVED.PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division 0 3 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kiilby,Associate Planner[x388) CITY OF TIGARD Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLID 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT[MIS)2001-00021 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL Q REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12,2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECKj-rHEFOLLOWINGITEMSTHASAPPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. A Written comments provided below: 144- INV 141111g- 7' M I r( MME- Fat rtic rAe-E - f-f-►i w 1 L,, BE- Kovi vEb? a 11 19v ._ T i vi aid(D! 1704774 rP-E 3 0-7-HEE 7 hjfFd �E(� j� PLS o �MT o4l4 B P-C1L fr1 -rr Sri (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS OF �� CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: November 28,2001 TO: John Boy,Property Manager/Public Works Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division o 0 3 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x388) CITY pE f CARD Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax 15031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLRI 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT[MIST 2001-00021 LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses aortion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION:pThe project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The l-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the pr tacw an h no objections to it. P ase contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: u 5ilL Np LSt 6"655/V 3i--- iS -ALb`T rale-g-3"5 Ani16- F.P.erk 1 Pr i/ 7 4-1Q04704051 01 4' ,�.1,-, ,v 16ag � t 1. /• �AJ5io& 4,Zi*-- i t-a-cn.A I,t 'va3 e Po i) pi ,.' it Al s teop6a- 4 tivi& -(sc.c-C-hu? of tag hlk iiiiii) --t-Oci-:/e /le-6 st4tii /a/166, -. f---1- Wati140 14-140 .. ft-i petiDE-6-1- 4-t7 4t7v.) ?Apo oF403 a IL +4,,,t..,frk6.,,„ -- lL.11 S I 4 - u. S lk 'St/. . AV; ■Ail i/ D #17 API iAl /� Tease r. a the oltowi information)Nam- of Person(s)Commenting: ' >C--- .ib P .f n9 �f � �/ �.� Phone Number(s): ; --� ;£ �� 6j)6e 96 veA) 1A)E 41-0&-- /004- L41-3 /v7t) 474i- toeec-1 . 4(144--4- -E 14-itT A-Aiinee of m4e- Gomtu-idi-1-77 41/V 6/9-te- ct6z_ (45 4405-c 04 V-11 ,ex/e fgat'ci-"411 t9/1)c51:o-c--/e.e'iux (06-7 Q1-7044A)-5p4-71-- ka-g-Apov5 WtovV --e• /4 119 p,&pe—,d .)- 4 iveAa 4-Re. ffilef-1 A)ea -4-0(4,4dcv "7-- 4-4 V-4/616-A As +8LE. d-P5e2) 0iU G ,L)4�9 toG4� J 4-0 `i'4- C4.0�. I � ijovid i1J0-( /^)-1C - WIbeL TGA Glh.e'CL 6111 /4 l�� /1-/-e ,moo�� . ), l' il)4P/�s . SENT BY.; 12- 3- 1 ; 10:58 ;TCI OREGON STATE OFF-, 5036847297;# 2/ 2 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY o Ilnar►RD Community Development Shaping?t Better Community DATE November 212001 TO: Diana Carpenter,AT&T Cable FROM: . of Tijard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad IOIbLAssociate Planner 0x3881 R F C E i V F 1 i DEC 13 2001 Phone; (5031050.41711 Fax: MOM 684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CSORI 2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLID 2001-00008 LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT(MIS]2001-00027 > LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION:PThe project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18,790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12.2001. •You.may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. N 1!.9,.1.1:.'� {Ii p 41° Hv nv hooul2iIl] i r We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it, ✓ l riT Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (2'fease pwvide theft/Towing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 1,AreZiedwy....4A I Phone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIYOOF TIIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division • STAFF CONTACT: Brad IGlby,Associate Planner(x3881 NOV 3 0 2001 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1297 CITY OF TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT[MIS)2001-00027 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses aortion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION:pThe project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials.for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12,2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard. Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: X k' k) ( exo ) p o ' Suhrf• ed . -\4(' , crkkkCE, (TThase provide the folthwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 6.\1.14 'Phone Number(s): X titin I • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF IIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x3881p'� ® 2001 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 CITY OF i iGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR)2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(MIS]2001-00021 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Qja.a-6t e k d t et(AA!.‘behIo( EA /00,t(r& r 44444j , 4444 t1;LCPr��� c k( hc4 Str-4..)1 12.S164-1,4,- (t hekw • W ki/_��� `�5}v e • ��: �/ n/ i'1 // /cam(// '( LCA (Please provide the fotrowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I ot REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI OF IIGARD Community cDevetopment Shaping Better Community DATE: November 28,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby,Associate Planner(x3881 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2001-00012/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLRI 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(MIS)2001-00027 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL < REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION:pThe project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE.NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: DECEMBER 12, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. iPLErASE CHECK THEFOLLOWING ITEMS{THAT,APPLY ,-' ' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tease provide the follinving information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR COI ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: J • . 11A - 11...�r— . S R )60 I(",i 'IS ;Jar FILE NAME: LEhRt ,JG TkEE, bAt CtA(ZE CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ['Central ['East l South ['West 121Proposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES /LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. -POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer /BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official %ENGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer-NATER DEPT./Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder .[PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager y/SUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester ✓PLANNER–POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! _C.D./Sherman Casper,Permit Coord.(sDR/cuP re:TIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* rUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* J4UALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* /CLEANWATER SERVICES Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN t11 _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE .DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE — Irish Bunnell,Development services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM III 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 S lem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA2OA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) �R.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(lcwuRB) CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(IGANRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) eve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders ✓ `Sr.Cartographer tcPAacAIMS 14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES 'PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue /Albany,OR 97321 V_SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _AT&T CABLE /RI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within V.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 L PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY ,VV- RIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 j/AT&T CABLE(Aww.e.orHduMof99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 7-Nov-01) Planning Secretary Materials A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ` . OF CITY OF TI Community(Development Shaping,Better Community I, cPatncia L. Lunsford: being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of'Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropnae Box(s)Below) ❑x NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: 7 SDR200I-I2/51R200I-8/MIS2001-27 — LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL 1 1/14/2002 AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ® Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on January 22,2002, and deposited in the United States Mail on January 22,2002, postage prepaid. • , --- ,,,„frrs c'74- .--- -) __..%, 4/ N .//1 L (Person that Prepared Notic C STATE OE ORcON ) If County oWashington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day /Zlial' _ , 2002. (Y of ,�� '� OFFICIAL SEAL // ,K � ►-:;�14DIANE M JELDERKS `•,i, ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON L /'�� i ` _ /` COMMISSION NO.326578 I I I I `�I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Exp" tO EXHIBIT A dilik 120 DAYS = 3/27/2002 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Was fzington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Numbers: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00012 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2001-00027 Case Name: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL Name of Owner: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Name of Applicant: Jim Waddle - Waddle Design/Planning/Architecture Address of Applicant: 1927 NW Kearney Street Portland, OR 97209 Address of Property: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court • Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington County Tax Assessor's Map No. 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901 A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW AND A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS, NARRATIVE, MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PLANNING DIVISION'S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT. THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 14, 2002 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER. Request: ➢ The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. Zoning Designation: I-L: Light Industrial District. Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Action: y ❑ Approval as Requested Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: I] Owners of Record Within the Required Distance 0 Affected Government Agencies I] The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator LI The Applicants and Owners The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development Department at the City of Tigard City Hall. Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 22, 2002 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 6, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.6.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON FEBRUARY 5, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Tri-County Industrial Park for ) FINAL ORDER Site Development and Sensitive Lands reviews and a lot line ) SDR 2001-00012 adjustment for a Learning Tree day care center at the corner ) SLR 2001-00008 of SW Bonita Rd. and SW Milton Ct. in the City of Tigard ) MIS 2001-00027 A. SUMMARY 1. This final order concerns an application by Tri-County Industrial Park (the "applicant")for Site Development and Sensitive Lands reviews and a lot line adjustment for a Learning Tree day care center on a roughly 2.5-acre parcel north and east of the Bonita Community Church in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Bonita Road and Milton Court; also known as tax lots 01900, 01901 and 0200, WCTM 2S112AB (the "site"). a. The applicant proposes to adjust the between the two legal lots that constitute the site to create lots containing roughly 80,130 square feet and 29,600 (MIS 2001-00027). Both proposed adjusted lots will comply with dimensional requirements of the I-L(Light Industrial) zone and with the other applicable standards of the CDC. The applicant does not propose to develop the larger of the adjusted lots at this time. b. The applicant proposes to develop the smaller of the two adjusted lots for the day care center(SDR 2001-00012). The proposed structure and associated development will or can comply with applicable standards of the Tigard Community Development Code ("CDC"). c. A portion of the access for the day care center will cross a portion of the 100-year flood plain; therefore a sensitive lands review is required for that crossing (SLR 2001-00008). Although the applicant did not introduce substantial evidence that the proposed development of the flood plain will comply with applicable standards,the applicant argued that it is feasible to do so before development occurs. 2. At the public hearing in this matter, City staff recommended approval, subject to conditions. See the Staff Report dated January 3, 2002 (the Staff Report). The applicant accepted the staff recommendations as amended at the hearing and waived its right to have the record held open for final argument. Other than relevant service providers and public agency staff, no one testified orally or in writing with objections or concerns. The hearings officer closed the record at the conclusion of the hearing. 3. For the reasons provided and referenced in this final order, the hearings officer approves the applications, subject to the conditions recommended by City staff with certain changes described more herein. B. HEARING AND RECORD 1. Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed public hearing on January 14, 2002 to receive and consider public testimony in this matter. The record includes a witness list,materials in the casefile as of the close of the hearing, and an audio record of the hearing. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte contacts,bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing. a. City planner Brad Kilby summarized the proposed development,the applicable approval standards,the Staff Report and recommended conditions of approval. b. City engineer Brian Rager testified that the applicant did not agree to grant an easement to the church adjoining the site to allow the church to use the driveway on the site for access to the church, and the CDC does not authorize the City to require the applicant grant such an easement. Therefore he recommended the hearings officer delete recommended condition of approval 16, which required the applicant to grant such an easement. c. Jack Steiger testified for the applicant. He introduced a letter in which he responded to concerns by the City Property Manager that the proposed outdoor play area for the day care center is too close to the railroad tracks that adjoin the east edge of the site. Summarizing the letter,he testified there is a very small chance that a train would leave the tracks at the site frontage,because the speed limit for trains in that section of track is 25 miles per hour, the track is relatively straight,the track is a constructed of continuously welded rails and the rail crossing at Bonita Road is a recently improved, state-of-the-art crossing. If a train did leave the track,based on the history of such incidents, train cars are likely to remain within 20 feet of the track. The closest point of the-proposed playground is 38 feet from the track and extends to 60 feet from the track. Therefore even if a train accident occurs abutting the site,there is a"very, very slim chance" that it would endanger children playing in the outdoor play area of the day care center. He testified the applicant accepts the Staff Report and the recommended conditions with the amendment proposed by Mr. Rager and that there is ample room to meet parking,pedestrian and landscaping requirements as provided in those conditions. He also waived the applicant's right to submit a closing written argument after the public hearing. Proposed day care center operator Jim Blackwell also appeared but did not offer any testimony. d. (Pastor) George Crisman of the adjoining church appeared and testified about concerns,including a concern about odors he believes emanate from the nearby CleanWaterServices ("CWS") sanitary sewer trunk line, a concern about increased storm water drainage toward the church building,and the relatively high volume of vehicular traffic on Bonita Road. He testified that traffic poses a safety hazard for the two to three dozen children who walk to the church for Wednesday and Saturday activities, and that the traffic will pose an obstacle for day care patrons,too. He discussed parking and access at the church, describing how access is provided to the church by means of a (nonconforming) driveway to Bonita Road,and that two or three vehicles can park on the concrete driveway behind the church. Other church-bound vehicles park on surrounding streets. Mr. Rager responded to the issue of the odor from the sewer trunk line to the effect that CWS can do little about the odor. 2. The hearings officer expressed concern about the lack of substantial evidence in the record to show that development of the proposed access across a portion of the flood plain would comply with the applicable provisions of CDC 18.775.070.B(1) or(3). Given that the application was subject to hearings officer review only because of development in the flood plain,the applicant should have been required to provide such evidence for the application to be complete. However,in this case,because only a small section of the flood plain is involved and the applicant does not propose any structures or fill in or adjoining the flood plain,the hearings officer concluded it was sufficient to delegate to the Director the responsibility for determining that the applicant will comply with CDC 18.775.070.B(1) or (3)before any site work. See proposed condition of approval 21. The hearings officer closed the public record at the end of the hearing and announced his intention to approve the applications subject to the conditions recommended by City staff with the amendment offered at the hearing. SDR 2001-00012, SLR 2001-00008 Hearings Officer Final Order and MIS 2001-00027(Learning Tree day care) Page 2 C. DISCUSSION City staff recommended approval of the application based on findings and conclusions and subject to conditions of approval recommended in the Staff Report with one amendment. The applicant accepted those conditions as amended. No one disputed the findings in the Staff Report. The hearings officer agrees with those findings, conclusions and conditions as amended by the discussion of testimony above, and adopts the affirmative findings in the Staff Report as support for this Final Order. D. CONCLUSION The hearings officer concludes that the Site Development Review, Sensitive Lands Review and Lot Line Adjustment applications do or can comply with the relevant standards and criteria of the Tigard CDC as provided in this Final Order, provided the application is subject to conditions of approval that ensure finals plans and certain other information are provided and found sufficient by the Director in a timely manner and that subsequent development will comply with applicable CDC standards and criteria. Therefore those applications should be approved subject to such conditions. E. DECISION Based on the findings and conclusions provided or referenced in this Final Order, the hearings officer hereby approves SDR 2001-00012, SLR 2001-00008 and MIS 2001- 00027 subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report with the following amendments: 1. Recommended condition of approval no. 16 is hereby deleted, although the hearings officer encourages the applicant to grant easement described therein. 2. Recommended condition of approval no. 21 is hereby amended to read as follows (added text is underlined): 21. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide certification from a registered professional engineer that the proposed encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and will not result in any increase in flood levels or water surface elevation during the base (100-year) flood. 3. Recommended condition of approval no. 22 is hereby amended to read as follows (added text is underlined): 22. Prior to site work,the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the Oregon Division of State Lands (ODSL) that indicates the proposal does not need their approval or that such approval has been granted. DATED this 21st d. - of .nuary, 2002. 4111110KA • Larry Epstein,17 P/ City of Tigari e. ngs Officer SDR 2001-00012, SLR 2001-00008 Hearings Officer Final Order and MIS 2001-00027(Learning Tree day care) Page 3 • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: January 14.2002 n ,- STAFF REPORT TOTHE -* V • HEARINGS OFFICER • CITY OFTIGARD e CommuratI development s FOR THEt,t ITY-DEr TIGARD40 OREGON't s ABette �ommun= 120 DAYS = 03/27/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL CASE NOS: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00012 Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) SLR2001-00008 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS) MIS2001-00027 APPLICANT/ OWNER: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. ARCHITECT: Jim Waddle Attn: Jack Steiger 1927 NW Kearney St. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, OR 97209 Portland, OR 97229 PROPOSAL: The applicant has proposed a Daycare Center within the Light Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompass a portion of the site. The applicant has also requested a lot line adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and Milton Court, and is described as: WCTM 2S112AB, Tax Lots 01900 ,01901, and 02000. COMPREHENSIVE • PLAN and ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial: I-L Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses includin industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. Daycares are allowed in this zone subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment in accordance with TDC Section 18.530.050(C)(1). The design of the daycare must fully comply with the State of Oregon requirements for outdoor open space. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends3ithat the Hearings Officer find that the°proposed Site D'evelopment'Review� :Lot Line AdJustrnent fzand Sensitive Lands Review will not adversely:affect the health, ;safety and welfare of Aho;City and meets the'hAppYroval Standards Therefore, Staff recommends "APPROVAL, subjectNto the following recommended Conditions7of Approvals LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 1 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL t THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS-SHALL BE SATISFIED4 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR$BUILDINGkPERMITS � .. , Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 1. Prior to recording, a Lot Line Adjustment survey map and legal descriptions showing the existing and proposed lot lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. The survey map shall include all access and utility easements. 2. A copy of the recorded survey shall be submitted to the City of Tigard for record. keeping. 3. Prior to recording the Lot Line Adjustment, the applicant shall clear title between tax lots 1900 and 1901 through the lot line consolidation process or by providing reciprocal access easements between all three lots. 4. The applicant shall provide a revised access plan that provides a safe pedestrian walkway extending from the entrance of the building to SW Milton Court. The walkway shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and signposts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The walkway shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. 5. The revised access plan shall show the access to Milton Court to be 30-feet in width with 24-feet of pavement, and shall be constructed to this standard. 6. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to show compliance with Tigard Development Code (TDC) Section 18.745.040 size and spacing. 7. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan illustrating the placement of trees within the interior of the parking lot at a ratio of one tree for every seven parking spaces and located within islands that are three feet wide and protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb along the east slide of the parking lot. 8. The applicant shall provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage as established in TDC Chapter 18.755, and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. 9. Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the site plan to reflect the dimensions of the parking areas in accordance with Table 18.765.1 and indicate bumper overhang areas on the plan. If the applicant proposes to split the spaces between compact and standard, the new plan must reflect the compact spaces and they must be marked as such prior to final occupancy. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 10. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the installation of the new concrete driveway on SW Milton Court, and any other work in the public ROW. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 2 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 11. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Shirley Treat, Engineering). 13. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will plant street trees along the frontages of SW Milton Court and SW Bonita Road. The trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2 inches and the species and the City Engineer and City Forester shall approve location. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate how they will provide sanitary sewer service to the new building. Staffs preference would be for the applicant to utilize the existing 4-inch service line that serves the existing home, provided the line size will meet Uniform Plumbing Code standards. 15. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have granted an ingress/egress easement to the Bonita Community Church parcel (2S1 12AB, #1600), for access to SW Milton Court. THE FOLLOWING CTONDITIONS£SHALLBE SATISFIED , PRIOR TO A"FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION x ._ Submit to the Planning Department (Brad Kilby, 639-4171, ext. 388) for review and approval: 17. The applicant shall install vertical slats into the chain link fence to screen the enclosure that is shown on the site plan. 18. Prior to final occupancy, the parking lot shall be striped in accordance with the TDC Chapter 18.765. 19. Prior to final occupancy, wheel stops shall be provided for all parking areas as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. 20. Pursuant to TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall provide 8 bicycle parking spaces for the site prior to final occupancy. 21. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide certification from a registered professional engineer that the proposed encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will not result in any increase in flood levels or water surface elevation during the base flood discharge. 22. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) that indicates that the proposal does not need their approval. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 3 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER 23. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the CWS service provider letter and submit verification of compliance from both CWS and the projects qualified consultant from Schott & Associates. 24. Prior to site work, the applicant shall supply the City arborist with a tree protection plan to protect those trees on site that will remain on the site, and insure that said measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. 25. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan, that shows no projection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: • 26. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 27. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual • observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water qualityfacility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Wtkins, Building Division. • 28. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment units. FAILSFY`THE CONDITIONStOF APPROVAL •WITHIN h18 MONTH• S '' ' O_F'THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF TH.EfHEARINO,SrOFFICER'S DECISION r SHALL RENDER TH'E HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISIONVOID r¢ x :"� , AN . ,._., = .. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A single-family home and pole building currently occupy the site. Lot 01901 was platted over in the plat of Bonita Industrial Park, and will be referred to in this report as lot 1 in conjunction with lot 1 of the aforementioned subdivision. A search of city records shows that aside from the Bonita Industrial Park Subdivision, no major alterations have been made to the site. There is very little history on the property within city records. Vicinity Information: There is a wide range of uses adjacent to this site. Directly to.the north, south, and east of the site, there are a number of heavy and light industrial uses. Directly to the west of the site there are a lot of multi-family developments and the Fanno Creek greenway. There is a railroad track that runs along the western edge of the property. The most unique characteristic of the site is its proximity to the Fanno Creek drainageway including some wetland areas that exist on site. Site Information and Proposal Description: • The site is currently developed with a single-family home and pole building. The proposal involves demolishing the home and constructing a daycare center in its place. The-applicant has proposed a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the property lines such that the pole building will reside on a separate lot. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 4 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct a daycare center in the Light- Industrial Zoning district. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. The proposed daycare facility is typically subject to a Type II staff review provided an Environmental Impact Assessment is submitted in accordance with Section 18.530.050.C.1. However, because a portion of the site is located within the 100-year floodplain and the associated floodway, all approvals for this request are subject to review before the City of Tigard Hearings Officer as a Type III-HO review. The request will require site development review approval, sensitive lands review approval, and a ministerial review approval for the proposed lot line adjustment. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET The Tigard Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal and be given the opportunity to provide written comments prior to a decision being made. Staff received no correspondence from citizens regarding this application. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this report are as follows: A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.360 Site Development Review) 18.410 Lot Line Adjustments) 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.775 Sensitive Lands Review) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) B. Additional Site Development Review Approval Standards (18.360) C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810) D. Impact Study (18.390) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standard; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.780, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 5 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS Site Development Review (18.360) The Site Development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Lot Line Adjustments (18.410) Section 18.410.040 - Approval Criteria states that the Director shall approve or deny a request for a lot line adjustment in writing based on findings that the following criteria are satisfied: An additional parcel is not created by the lot line adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustments is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; The application states that the proposed lot line adjustment includes three different tax parcels. However, in review of the sites history, tax lot 1901 was platted over in the Bonita Industrial Park Subdivision in 1992. According to the Washington County Cartographer's office, the area is no longer a separate parcel, rather, it is an area of Lot 1 of the named subdivision that still has a tax number assigned. Therefore, no new lots will be created as part of this adjustment; two (2) lots exist and two (2) lots will remain after the proposed adjustment. The I-L zone has no minimum lot size requirement, however, the lots will be approximately 80,130 square feet and 29,600 square feet respectively. This standard is satisfied. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structures(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; As previously indicated, both lots as configured by the Lot Line Adjustment will still have the ability to accommodate development that complies with the requirements of the underlying zoning district. This criteria has been satisfied. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district, including: • The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district; • The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the access way may not be included in the lot area calculation; • Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement; and • Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. Both lots will still meet the minimum standards of the respective zone as they apply to width, frontage, and setbacks and are discussed later in this report. This criteria is satisfied. With regard to flag lots: • When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. • A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an access way is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Section 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 6 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The flag lot associated with this application will be addressed later in this report. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an access way would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Access is discussed later in this report and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District has had the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Their comments have been included as a part of this report. This criterion has been satisfied. Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705: Access, Egress, and Circulation. Compliance with Chapter 18.705 is discussed later in this report. This standard can be satisfied. Exemptions from dedications: A lot line adjustment is not considered a development action for purposes of determining whether floodplain, greenway, or right-of-way dedication is required. Variances to development standards: An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applicant has not requested a variance or an adjustment with this application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Lot Line Adjustment criteria have been met, however, staff is concerned that there may be future confusion with reference to tax lot 1901, and would recommend that the Hearings Officer impose the following conditions. CONDITIONS: • Prior to recording, a Lot Line Adjustment survey map and legal descriptions showing the existing and proposed lot lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. The survey map shall include all access and utility easements. • A copy of the recorded survey shall be submitted to the City of Tigard for record keeping. • Prior to recording the Lot Line Adjustment, the applicant shall clear title between tax lots 1900 and 1901 through the lot line consolidation process or by providing reciprocal access easements between all three lots. Industrial Zoning Districts (18.530) The subject property is zoned I-L (Light Industrial). Daycare uses with over 5 children are permitted subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment in accordance with Section 18.530.050.C.1. Additionally, the design of the daycare must fully comply with State of Oregon requirements for outdoor open space setbacks. The applicant should note that schools are not a permitted use in the I-L zone. Although the proposal has the word "school" in its title, the applicant has stated in telephone conversations that the building is only a daycare. It is the applicant's burden to insure that the use falls within the use classifications for the Light Industrial zone. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 7 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Development standards in Industrial Zones are provided in the following table: TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD ? NZ_rMNdgu� A-R i' Wt PrposedrLot1Lot2M • Minimum Lot Size None None Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 130/145+ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 30 ft. 80/150 ft. • -Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. 40+/N/A ft. -Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] • Met - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3] Met - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street -- -- Maximum Height 45 ft. 19/existing ft. • Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 56% • Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 26% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5]Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050.6 are satisfied. [6]Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. The proposed building is approximately 19 feet in height and is well below the 45 foot maximum allowed height. As noted above, approximately 56% of the site will be covered with - impervious surface area, including the building and. parking area. This is well below the 85% maximum allowed in I-L zones. The remaining 44% of the site will be landscaped or utilized as playground area. The building will be setback approximately 80 feet from SW Milton Court, which exceeds the 30-foot front yard setback requirement. There is no applicable rear or side yard setbacks since the properties to the north and south are also zoned for industrial development. FINDING: The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable development • standards in industrial zones. Access. Egress and Circulation (18.705) Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant is proposing a new sidewalk to SW Bonita Road from the building entrance, but no sidewalk to SW Milton Court. Because the project's access is from SW Milton Court, and in accordance with the above standard, the applicant should be required to extend a walkway to SW Milton Court. The applicant can still extend a walkway to SW Bonita Road, but it is not required. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: The proposal does not provide a walkway from the ground floor entrance to the street, which provides the required access and egress as required in TDC Section.18.705.030(F)(1). LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 8 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; and There is no proposed crossings of vehicle access driveways or parking lots associated with the current proposal, however, in the conditioned revision of the previous standard, the applicant should be cognizant of pedestrian safety in the design of the walkway that is extended to SW Milton Court. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant indicates that the new curb, gutter, and sidewalks will be constructed with concrete. This criterion has been met. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 99 parking spaces is one 30-foot-wide access with a 24- foot pavement width. The applicant has proposed one access point of 25-feet in width with 24-feet of pavement. This criterion has not been met. FINDING: The proposal does not show a 30-foot-wide access with 24-feet of pavement as requiredinTDC Table 18.705.3. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall provide a revised access plan that provides a safe pedestrian walkway extending from the entrance of the building to SW Milton Court. The walkway shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and .signposts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The walkway shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. • The revised access plan shall show the access to Milton Court to be 30- feet in width with 24-feet of pavement, and shall be constructed to this standard. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 9 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER An environmental noise impact assessment was required as part of the application in accordance with the Tigard Development Code as it relates to permitting daycare facilities within industrially zoned properties. The assessment must show that noise from industrial sources does not negatively impact the proposed daycare site. The applicant has provided such a report from Daly-Standlee & Associates, an engineering firm that conducted sound measurements on January 5, 2001. According to the report, "The amount of noise at the proposed daycare center site caused by industrial sources is less than that allowed by the Oregon DEQ...and much less than that allowed at a noise sensitive land use...of the Tigard Municipal Code.. The report also stated that traffic from 1-5, Bonita Road, and air traffic contributed a lot of noise to the study that was not considered industrial. The noises that could potentially affect the operation of the daycare are not primarily generated from the industrial uses, but rather from the traffic. It should also be noted that the City of Tigard's Property Manager expressed concerns in regards to the proximity and noise associated with the train traffic that occurs adjacent to this parcel in his comments. Specifically, the concerns were with the location of the play area, and the failure of the report from Daly-Standlee & Associates to address the noise generated from passing trains. In reviewing these concerns, staff has brought this to the attention of the applicant. The applicant is performing research that will presumably be addressed during the public hearing. It is questionable as to whether train traffic will negatively impact the operations of the daycare facility. Visible Emissions. Within the Commercial zoning districts and the Industrial Park (I-P) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission ofure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rles for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes.such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: As this is not a typical industrial use, there is not the typical machinery, emission stacks, or sound creating devices that would potentially create problem environmental conditions that have been listed above. The above performance standards are met. These standards would be subject to code enforcement investigation if for some reason, the above standards were in question. Landscaping and Screening (18.745) Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 10 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that provides for `flowering cherry' trees along SW Bonita Road that would meet this standard, however, the TDC requires that the trees be spaced according to their size at maturity. For this species, the recommended spacing is no greater than 30-feet on center and 2 inch caliper trees. The submitted landscape plan shows forty-foot on center spacing and 1 inch caliper trees. FINDING: The proposal fails to meet the street tree size and spacing requirements of TDC Section 18.745.040(C)(2)(b). CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to show compliance with TDC Section 18.745.040 size and spacing. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Buffering and Screening is required between different types of land uses. The proposed daycare center is a permitted use within a Light Industrial zone and abutting industrial zones on three sides and open space on the fourth. As such, it is not subject to any required screening standards of the TDC or the buffering requirements of Table 18.745.1. The applicant has provided a landscape plan that shows landscaping abutting the three industrial zones. This criterion has been satisfied. Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking of areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has proposed a landscape designthat would achieve the required result of the above standards. However, the applicant has not fully complied with the need for trees within the interior of the parking area along the.east side of the parking lot. FINDING: The proposal does not meet the criteria set forth in TDC Section 18.745.050(E)(1)(a.)(4). CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan illustrating the placement of trees within the interior.of the parking lot at a ratio of one tree for every seven parking spaces and located within islands that are three feet wide and protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb along the east side of the parking lot. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755) Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 11 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchisehauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not indicated which of the. 4 methods will be used to demonstrate compliance with this chapter, but has shown an enclosure on the site plan. FINDING: The proposal does not specifically detail which option of the four options available within TDC Section 18.755.040. CONDITION:The applicant shall provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage as established in TDC Chapter 18.755, and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Fndoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent-to aublic or privatestreet; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The sitelan shows a trash enclosure with a wall and fence surrounding it within an interior side yard. The applicant has also indicated in the accompanying narrative that the recycling storage area meeting the minimum requirement criteria for industrial uses has been proposed. The site plan indicates a 100 square-foot enclosure dedicated to this purpose. According to the TDC the applicant is required to provide 48 square feet. This standard has been met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not indicated on the site plan what type of screening will be utilized for the refuse container. They have indicated that there will be a 5-foot high chain link fence surrounding the enclosure. The gate opening is 10 feet wide, and the applicant has indicated that a hasp and padlock will be used to secure the gate. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of complete compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 12 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITION: The applicant shall install vertical slats into the chain link fence to screen the enclosure that is shown on the site plan. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765) Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The parking area has accommodations for two ADA accessible parking spaces that will meet the requirements for a 21-space parking facility. This criteria has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The applicant is required to provide a 30-foot access with 24-feet of pavement and has identified the visual clearance areas as required by the TDC. Access was discussed previously in this report, and visual clearance will be addressed later in this report. This standard can be met. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The applicant has not indicated that the parking lot will be striped, but has illustrated striping on the plans. This criterion is not satisfied. FINDING: The applicant has not indicated that the parking lot will be striped as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. CONDITION:Prior to final occupancy, the parking lot shall be striped in accordance with the TDC Chapter 18.765. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has proposed 6-inch concrete curbs at the edges of paving adjacent to planting areas, but has not indicated within the narrative or site plan that wheel stops will be provided. This criterion has not been met. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 13 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FINDING: The proposal does not address the requirements for wheel stops as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. CONDITION:Prior to final occupancy, wheel stops shall be provided for all parking areas as required by the TDC Chapter 18.765. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Table 18.765.1. outlines the minimum dimensions for angled parking. The proposal identifies 18 spaces with the following dimensions: `` `.; a µMnimumsuCompact , Standards ; � £` Compact/Standard� � �pace-t :tiSpaces 3$ 'anF,i e. et ? r, e - yy. .,`!(�P?3ro1:ap„; v'-swd)}M Parking Angle 90 degrees 90 degrees 90 degrees Stall Width 7.5-8.0/8.5-10.0 8.5' typical 8.5' typical Stall Depth 16.5/18.5 15.6' 15.6' Aisle Width 24-28/24-28 28' 28' Stall Width Parallel to Aisle 7.5-8.0/8.5-10 +8.5' +8.5' Module Width 58-61/61-65 59' 59' FINDING: As illustrated in the table, the proposed parking lot fails to meet the minimum standards of Table 18.765.1. If the proposal that the parking angle remain at 90 degrees and a stall width of 8.5 feet stands, then the stall depth, aisle width, stall width parallel to the aisle, and module width should reflect the minimum dimensions for the standards as they apply within Table 18.765.1 for compact spaces and standard spaces independently. The Table must be read directly across and not interchanged to ensure function of the parking areas. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the site plan to reflect the dimensions of the parking areas in accordance with Table 18.765.1 and indicate bumper overhang areas on the plan. • If the applicant proposes to split the spaces between compact and standard, the new plan must reflect the compact spaces and they must be marked as such prior to final occupancy. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. The minimum bicycle parking requirement for daycare facilities is 1.5 per classroom, and the applicant has proposed 6 ribbon type bicycle parking spaces. This criterion has not been met. FINDING: The applicant has proposed 5 classrooms which, according to Table 18.765.2 requires 7.5 bicycle parking spaces. CONDITION: Pursuant to TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall provide 8 bicycle parking spaces for the site prior to final occupancy. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The minimum off-street parking requirement for daycare facilities is 2.0 per classroom. Therefore, this use would require 10 parking spaces. The proposal shows 21 spaces including ADA accessible spaces. This criterion has been met. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 14 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER Sensitive Lands (18.775) The Hearings Officer shall have the authority to issue a sensitive landsermit in the 100-year floodplain by means of a Type IIIA procedure, as governedp by Section 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070 B-E A majority of the wetland areas and the floodplain associated with this site will be on lot 2 of the Bonita Industrial Park Subdivision upon completion of the Lot Line Adjustment. However, both a wetland and the 100-year floodplain encumber a portion of Lot 1 of the same subdivision, and the lot on which the daycare facility is proposed. Within the 100-year floodplain. The Hearings Officer shall approve,- approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; A natural resources assessment was prepared and submitted to Clean Water Services for the wetland and presumably the development of the access within the 100-year floodplain, however, staff never received the assessment and cannot be certain that it addressed this criterion. Therefore, this criterion has not been satisfied. FINDING: The applicant has not provided any certification from a registered professional engineer that the encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. CONDITION:Prior to any site work, the applicant shall provide certification from a registered professional engineer that the proposed encroachment of the access into the 100-year floodplain will not result in any increase in flood levels or water surface elevation during the base flood discharge. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; • A portion of the access will encroach into the 100-year floodplain, and the area is designated as industrial on the Comprehensive Plan land use map. This criterion is satisfied. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood; The condition that was recommended previously in this report should provide the information needed to analyze the impact of the proposed land form alteration on the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The greenway in which the Fanno Creek Trail system would possibly follow is located to the west of Milton Court. This parcel is outside of the location of any potential pathway. This criterion is met LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 15 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and It has not been ascertained as to whether or not the applicant would need any approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or the Oregon DSL for work within the 100-year floodplain, nor has the applicant provided evidence that would indicate that they are not necessary. The applicant has obtained a concurrence letter from the Oregon DSL relative to the wetland delineation that was performed by Schott & Associates that will be addressed later in this report. This criterion has not been satisfied. FINDING: The applicant has not provided any evidence that would indicate that no approval from the USACOE and the Oregon DSL is necessary for the work that is proposed within the 100-year floodplain. CONDITION:Prior_to site work, the applicant shall provide evidence in writing from the USACOE and the Oregon DSL that indicates that the proposal does not need their approval. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. There is no need for additional open land area within and adjacent to this floodplain as the majority of the floodplain belongs to the City of Tigard already. This criterion is satisfied. Within wetlands. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: The proposed land form alteration or development is neither on wetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within 25 feet of such a wetland; The proposed land form alteration is not within an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor within 25-feet of such a wetland. The wetland that is located on this site is defined as an isolated wetland that has been degraded in earlier developments. Clean Water Services, and the Oregon Division of State Lands have reviewed and concurred with a delineation that was provided by Shott & Associates as part of this application. This criterion is satisfied. The extentand nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; The applicant has provided a wetland delineation prepared by Schott & Associates that has been affirmed by the Oregon Division of State Lands and Clean Water Services (CWS). There is no proposed disturbance of the wetland, but there is disturbance of the CWS vegetated corridor that has been characterized as degraded by Heidi Berg, Site Assessment Coordinator for CWS. The proposed alteration is for access purposes. The City Engineer's review official, Brian Rager, has stated that access for this site was allowed only off of Milton Court to mitigate possible traffic impacts, and the proposed access is the minimum disturbance necessary for the use. This criterion is met. Any encroachment or change in, on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated; As stated above, the applicant has provided a delineation of the wetland, and has gained approval of a mitigation plan from CWS. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 16 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER FINDING: The applicant has been provided with several conditions from CWS to mitigate impacts from this development on the nearby wetland. CONDITION:The applicant shall comply with the conditions of the CWS service provider letter and submit verification of compliance from both CWS and the projects qualified consultant from Schott & Associates. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, erosion control provisions of the Surface Water Management program of Washington County must be met and areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted in like or similar species in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; The applicant-has provided an erosion control plan that addresses such measures that will be approved by CWS and the City of Tigard Engineering Department prior to site work. This criterion has been satisfied. All other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met; All sensitive lands requirements of the Sensitive Lands chapter can be. achieved with compliance of the Conditions of Approval for this project. This criterion has been satisfied. The provisions of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal, shall be met; These provisions are addressed later in this report. Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natural Areas, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. As indicated previously, this proposal can be conditioned such that it satisfies the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is satisfied. Signs (18.780) . No sign or sign structure shall hereafter be erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally altered or relocated within the City limits except as provided by this title, and a permit for the same sign or sign structure has been issued by the Director. The applicant has stated in the narrative that they will apply for sign permits separate from this application. This criterion is satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790) Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has indicated that the requirement for an arborist's report was waived, and has indicated that only one tree is to be removed in the development of the property. Staff visited the site on December 12, 2001 to ensure that no other trees would be impacted by the development of this site. The tree will essentially be mitigated for in the landscape design. This criterion has been met. However, the applicant is still responsible for protectingexisting trees during construction. FINDING: The applicant does not indicate how the existing trees that are to remain on site will be protected during construction as required by the TDC. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 17 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONDITION:Prior to site work, the applicant shall supply the City arborist with a tree protection plan to protect those trees on site that will remain on the site, and insure that said measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795) Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. There are no proposed structures inside of the vision clearance area, therefore, this standard is satisfied. B. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain) and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screeningand Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.3.60.090.14 (Landscping ); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 Provision for the Disabled); 18.360.090.15 (Provisions of the underlying zone). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extentossible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site bylocating the lot in a location that will incorporate a majority of the trees into buffering and screening. No buildings or structures are proposed that will hinder air circulation, natural lighting or prevent fire fighting apparatus from performing their jobs. This criteria has been met. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 18 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has not indicated concern or objection with the proposal. To ensure that the plan addresses crime prevention concerns, the applicant would need to provide a detailed lighting plan to the Tigard Police Department and the Tigard Planning Department. Additionally, the applicant has proposed vegetation that would allow easy observation of activities that are on-going on the site. The crime prevention standards have not been fully met. FINDING: The proposal fails to address lighting as required by the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). CONDITION: Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan, that shows no projection off site and complies with crime prevention requirements of the TDC Section 18.360.090(10). Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Bonita Road. The closest stops are located on SW Hall Blvd. and SW 72' Ave. Both stops are greater than 1/4 mile from the subject site, therefore, this standard does not apply. C. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS - CHAPTER 18.810: Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion rtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TMinimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local commercial industrial street to have a 50 right-of-way width and a 34-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 19 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER This site lies adjacent to SW Milton Court, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW along this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW Milton Court is improved adjacent to this site, except for street trees. The applicant's plan shows they will plant street trees as a part of their project. The site also lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, a major collector that was fully improved by the City in recent years. Street trees should also be added to the site frontage. The applicant's plan shows they will provide these trees as a part of their project. Access to this site will be provided via SW Milton Court, as direct access to SW Bonita Road is not permitted. Staff discussed with the applicant the need to provide access rights to the Bonita Community Church site so that eventually the existing driveway on SW Bonita Road could be eliminated. The applicant agreed that they should provide an ingress/egress easement to the church. Prior to construction, the applicant shall demonstrate that the ingress/egress easement is recorded. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Sidewalks are present on both SW Milton Court and SW Bonita Road. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Bonita Road with an existing 4-inch lateral provided to the existing house on this parcel. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how they plan to serve the new day school building. Prior to construction, the applicant shall resolve how sewer service will be provided. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage issues for this site to address. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 20 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows that they will treat the new stormwater onsite and provide 25-year storm detention in a large pipe, before discharging to the existing public stormwater system in SW Milton Court. The overall plan concept is acceptable to Staff, and the detention pipe appears to be adequately sized to accommodate the needs of this site. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. The proposal has frontage on SW Bonita, Road, which has existing bike lanes on both sides. There is no need to require any additional right-of-way from this project. This criterion has been satisfied. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. As the bike lanes.are already existing, there is no need to construct additional right-of-way. This criterion is satisfied. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. This criterion does not apply to this proposal. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication; lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: e The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 21 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site. Therefore, this section does not apply. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: There is an existing 12-inch public water line in SW Milton Court that has plenty of capacity to serve this development. The applicant proposes to tap the main line to provide a domestic service line to the site. No additional public water main extensions are necessary. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to use two Stormwater Management catch basin units to treat the impervious area runoff from this site. The concept is acceptable, but the applicant will need to submit specific calculations to the Engineering Department to verify that two of these units will adequately serve this site. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 22 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The proposed units from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water s stem resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per WS rgulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the Building division as a part of the site permit review. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. D. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.390.040.6.2.e states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The use will be subject to a Traffic Impact Fee to mitigate impacts to the transportation system. There is no need to require further dedication or improvements of right-of-way around the site as they are already improved to the designated standard. All other improvements are necessary for services to the site. All other impacts have been addressed elsewhere in this report. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division was sent this proposal for review but offered no comments at this time. The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent this proposal for review and the comments have been incorporated into this report. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 23 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager/Water Department has reviewed this application and has indicated that a back flow device shall be installed behind the water meter. The project is required to connect to the storm water collection system. All utility work should be shown in drawings and coordinated with the City prior to site work. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has provided the following comments: • The minimum required fire flow is 2173 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) • A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this development. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. The two existing fire hydrants shown on the plans are acceptable to satisfy this requirement. (UFC 903.4) • Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) • Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) • A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) • A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. City of Tigard Arborist has reviewed this application and has requested that the applicant consider substituting some White Oak trees into the landscape plan in place of some of the Red Maples that have been proposed. City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: The site noise assessment does not address noise from passing trains on the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. It would seem prudent to require testing to know how often or the number of trains that are passing the site and the average duration of the noise from there engines, and horns. He also expressed concerns with the location of the play area with regard to the proximity of the tracks. He suggested that the parking lot be placed between the track and the building to act as a buffer. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and requested that an exterior lighting plan be submitted to the Police Department for review. Long Range Planning Division has reviewed this application, but offered no comments. LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 24 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER • SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and offered comments and conditions which have been incorporated into the body of this report as part of their preliminary review, and have been required as part of their approval. AT&T has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. Washington County has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. Tualatin Valley Water District, Portland General Electric, Tri-Met, Southern Pacific Railroad, Burlington Northern Railroad, Santa Fe Railroad, and Verizon were given the opportunity to review this proposal and submitted no comments or objections. January 3,2002 PREPARED BY: Brad DATE Associate Planner 1r January 3, 2002 APPROVED Bl Richard Bewers'•rff DATE Planning Man.ger LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL PAGE 25 OF 25 1/14/2002 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER I I I CITY of TIGARD 4 Il OEOO RAPXIO INFORMATION SYSTEM • 6 \ . VICINITY MAP • SDR2001 -00012 4110.• SLR2001 -00008 11 /L,,,,,. s • LANDNARKLN MIS2001 00022 -11 °G D = ! Ii C= ClZb ��S. I �tiF P-o� ,..•� °�cT , LEARNING TREE w�: ►�� IP DAY SCHOOL � .. 2 SUBJECT II* . � : ERf, TAX LOTS r. . 4� \N i!IL mo a -e ITA„$DLI r J Th f / BONITA RD Mill ) . (-- ... . MA Miiii > a I o r D,1ECT S N • 1c m LL 0 • N ao I $ I- > 0 400 800 Feet 71: • { 1"=505 feet T M A a J CARDINAL LN ,.i IIII I r ... • �/ City of Tigard '—I Information on this map is for general location only and I - should be verified with the Development Services Division. 1_ N°2 13125 SW Hall Blvd tll a Tigard,OR 97223 ..\ > GF u 5 (503)639-4171 > \Fi -: Inc, http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Nov 28,2001;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR .. . • r------- •) . �,� \ . \ ..' 1\ ... 1 \ S y • 1 `\z 1 3 III 11 \\ o 1 / �...„ O , LOT 1 . \ S ' \ M'-Olt TRAMI erxo..I • .04.04 LW RAT AAA ePOOR aa0«a. \ '-11104• tillr . wr.4•co...nu rug. n.wlR s'sail er.ALATd O ACE /' 0Prevaoa OCL uan 0WM wTALl vrnt rwTS t1 A lloas_� r. Q INNP Aro PADLOCK I /MI Tor ; i� • ,}hP�� 1 1 I Il10YB 9• iN� I,� f� \ Q All 2 f VA illE VIA g , N• - ' v.M� )'e.ot OAT[ 7 .c* ;� - • t: 01.71 ,. , s .•WON ouh L.R rest ell q 5.y 3 \141 Lmn:"" T>.O rest IILATS ,. 4613 � a 1 11 il lit .' :W55#...01 rw 47.111':-illakm s't" i ----"": ;.:\ ittai 1 I I 1 I I Fl.ov�Ca ••.•••o.XA-Ar.. N.T/WPANPV14 j e' I I I Iovum Aro WIWrou.l LNC Pea= row.MIXT TTI<1 Ar aa-o•cc,eat ' SW BONITA ROAD (COUNTY ROAD # 736) "M1 • CI QF TIGARD SDR2001.00012/SLR2001.000081MIS2001.00027 CITY O.TIGARD S1IDEYELOPMEffREVJEY!S1IPLAN N LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL (Map is not to scale) • - \ , , . . .., ..A A I LOT 2 il I I . 2,1 lir A :..- • e ow 0',et. • ' .. '.,, *":1. • •-::, \ • ) \ / ......, Parcel Size: / Existing Lot 1—43,546 S.F. Lot 2—66,184 S.F. ' . \.4. 1 • t.fo 0 i \ Proposed Lot 1-29,600 S.F. Lot 2-80,139 S.F. i \ 03 0 Restrictions: None III/ I. tk / 1 i . • a C.1 11 •\ r... . 0_ I . . .... eel W. PRO1poee,NEUJ AMA, t4P191 GO.FT. 1 0 — • A •A LEGENDI;,3 • LOT I bc • '::::::::::::::::::::. • % T., 1 \ • .z. •,2 :::::: :i:i:::::i::::..:.. . \ 0 11 • ,T1' . :::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::::.:.:::::.:.,. 1 .1 0 \ n ii 2.0111.01 1.1.01916i :::::::::::::.X.:.X........-..:...:....'. COOKIE /;,‘,... VATOI 1C1131 II CAM SAM I • ...NCO r_. .--- \ 2 I ••••:'•:i:i::]:;:::::.,:]:x::K:i:i:i:K::: •„............................ — — IV4CE 4,/, 1 :... : A aws WL'oe ••-• RIC ..... PLC WC J4 ". '.-.::::K:::::::K::.:K:•::K:i::g:i:, 1 \ VP 1:1; • . X =Al= .- ....F*K:Egigii. .1 \ .13 =:=:= ""ur /•0110/ III 919.7."•KM .V.11:K:':%::e .1: • 0 II GIN,MM./ {=1 CIIM43. / PAL KM •.:•..:::::::::::::::::::::: • I.CliC9111' e . •.•••••••••••• - . .\ 0 • • .1.1111010t Wall UK NM - Ze.MC MOUNT i A.11A11:11104:4 • z:MON MK '' j 1 I LOT'S \ ' • 1 ...3..... % ,i, ,r PROPOSED NEUJ AREA, 1 \ • 4, .4/4" 29,600 SO.FT. I \ . \. •-0" _ , LA r,.... lmm...., ... _ .- . ;;•,,,,,, It E;11 6,..— wow,ammo..e.c.... amen ,..:::14111 1----. IMIllik4 ,.......... 11 /1 - - • ,di. tv-•••vonse.-Ftler . ...„.. H a a A . CITY OF TIGARD. At . SDR2001-00012/SLR2001-00008IMIS2001-00027 .....i.of...h. CITY OF TIOARO LOTLINEAI/JUSIIENTSRPLAN N LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL (Map is not to scale) . . .- • Jim Waddle EXHIBIT 13 Waddle Design/Planning/Architecture SDR2001-00012 1927 NW Kearney Street LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL Portland, OR 97209 FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Attn: Jack Steiger 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, OR 97229 Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. 2106 SE Ochoco Street Milwaukie, OR 97222 Jack Steiger 19201 Megan PI. Lake Oswego, OR 97034-7467 Jim Blackwell 2838 SW Orchard Hill Lane Lake Oswego, OR 97035 George Crisman 14940 SW 81st Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Ij AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITYOFTIGARD Community cDevelopment Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check APWopnate Box(s)Bebw) ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: I SDR2001-I2/SLR200I-8/MIS2001-27 – LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL (I/14/2002) File No/Name Reference) (Date of Punic Heanng) — City of Tigard Planning Director Z Tigard Hearings Officer — Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhlblt"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on December 24,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on December 24,2001, postage prepaid. c / �-- )��.0 -- _.L' \ n4 / '/ (Person that Prepared Notice) C STATE Of OpkEGow ) County of`Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 474clay of / 74,-cA- , 2001 44,z--,. OFFICIAL SEAL ':i."i' DIANE M JELDERKS '.# NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' ' COMM1 S)ON.4,, 325578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 . --.- : (C?/ / el NOTARY P ,LIC My Commissio pires: o MHIRa-A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, 4'0 IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. •I�I� CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY JANUARY 14, 2002 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00012 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2001-00027 FILE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL APPLICANT: Jim Waddle OWNER: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Waddle Design/Planning/Architecture Attn: Jack Steiger 1927 NW Kearney Street 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, OR 97209 Portland, OR 97229 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESET\ IRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PF, )SED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE FudLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MH 1 BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. , IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION LESS THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AN OPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER BRAD KILBY AT (503)639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. ' \.- rrrn 1teN.Fa 1 \t CITYof TiGARD VICINITY MAP ,4 SDR2001-00012 SLR2001-00008 V OM'= 0 .. _ MIS200I-00021 ����� `1 LEARNING TREE AN ppnL____DAY SCHOOL III 11, a SUBJECT N �� °. , R TAX LOTS j * eao III l 'r- --/ A II UM o ry iili _ II MEM imi !III ' 0 ADO .00 Fru ��_� err � '��a ...., \` __ y „ 3 EXIIIT. 2S112A6-01300 2S112AC-00200 r.7 BANK AMERICA LEASING&CAPITOL G NATIONAL SAFETY CO BY BONITA PACKING 17010 SW WEIR RD ATTN:DALE BEVAN VP BEAVERTON,OR 97007 7333 SW BONITA RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112AC-00600 2S112AC-00500 BHK PROPERTIES LLC N IONAL SA TY CO INC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 1701 EIR RD TIGARD,OR 97224 VERT ,OR 97007 2S 112AC-00700 2S 112AB-02300 B 'ROPE' S LLC SHEININ-MENDENHALL LLC I 14280 D AVE BY PARROTT PARTNERHIP RD,OR 9 "24 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00800 2S 112AC-00400 BH ROP IES LLC SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION 14280 72ND AVE BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO - T RD,0 97224 • 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH OMAHA,NE 68102 2S112BD-00100 2S112AB-01600 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP PO BOX 1890 PO BOX 324 GRESHAM,OR 97030 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S112BA-00300 2S112AC-02700 CREEKSIDE COMMONS-48 LLC T3 ENTERPRISES LLC BY THOMAS J ROGERS PO BOX 23962 PO BOX 231296TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S112BA-00200 2S112AB-01200 CR KSIDE CO MONS-48 LLC TENNANT INVESTORS BY TH ROGERS PO BOX 1658 PO B 23 6 PORTLAND,OR 97207 T RD,OR 97 81 2S112AC-02600 2S 112BA-06 EMPIRE BATTERIES INC TI TY OF PO BOX 23962 13 SW L TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97223 2S112AB-00800 2S112AB-01700 FOUGHT&COMPANY INC TI •:D OF PO BOX 23759 131 . '• ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97223 2S112AB-00700 2S112AC-008 FOU OMPANY INC TIGA ITY OF PO 2 9 131 S ALL T ARD,OR .97223 T ARD,OR 7223 2S112AB-01900 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 2S112AB-02000 T' OUNTY IUSTRIAL PARK I 210. E OCH0.• ST LWAUKIE,OR 9 222 2S 112AB-01901 I-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PAR• C 2106 -" b. OCO ST WAUKIE, •' 97222 2S112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST MS42 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 JIM WADDLE WADDLE DESIGN/PLANNING/ARCHITECTURE 1927 NW"KEARNEY STREET PORTLAND OR 97209 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. ATTN: JACK STEIGER 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND OR 97229 a Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs . 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 • Alexander Craghead V 12205 SW Hall Boulevard • Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: November 1, 2001 . CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED .11, ol . (500') 3 �, NDMARK LN \ 11111010,.<96 c�o� °G� ' FOR: Jim Blackwell 21021106/00O ti� RE: 25112AB, 1900, 1901 ^ mvuomoa ntauonno - ,0 Property owner information �. W is valid for 3 months from • '3 os 12- 11300aoo Q the date printed on this map. �^ z %187011110200T ,uouomoo mntnaoteno • �. I \� .t :m:ua= nn:aeataoo l mt:ew0000 • \ ' � 1. J BONITA RD f \ :�iti tcoaeoo im:uoaoa N as 11112AC0e 0,0 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 1"=273 feet mt:auoroo ' 71112u00700 mtmee:mo 4 numeonm' 711011001100 , rnxgcoaa• r "7i City of Tigard O Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. / 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Nov 2,2001;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S 11t2AB-01300 2S112AC-00200 BANK AMERICA LEASING&CAPITOL G NATIONAL SAFETY CO BY BONITA PACKING 17010 SW WEIR RD ATTN:DALE BEVAN VP BEAVERTON,OR 97007 7333 SW BONITA RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112AC-00600 2S 112AC-00500 BHK PROPERTIES LLC N IONAL SA TY CO INC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 1701 EIR RD TIGARD,OR 97224 VERT ,OR 97007 2S 112AC-00700 2S 112AB-02300 B ROPE S LLC SHEININ-MENDENHALL LLC I 14280 D AVE BY PARROTT PARTNERHIP RD,OR 9 24 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00800 2S 112AC-00400 BH ROP IES LLC SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION 14280 72ND AVE BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO T RD,0 97224 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH OMAHA, NE 68102 2S 112BD-00100 2S112AB-01600 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP PO BOX 1890 PO BOX 324 GRESHAM,OR 97030 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S112BA-00300 2S112AC-02700 CREEKSIDE COMMONS-48 LLC T3 ENTERPRISES LLC BY THOMAS J ROGERS PO BOX 23962 PO BOX 231296 TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 112BA-00200 2S 112AB-01200 CR KSIDE CO MONS-48 LLC TENNANT INVESTORS BY TH ROGERS PO BOX 1658 PO B 23 6 PORTLAND,OR 97207 T RD,OR 97 81 2S 112AC-02600 2S 112BA-06 EMPIRE BATTERIES INC TI TY OF PO BOX 23962 13 SW L TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97223 2S 112AB-00800 2S 112AB-01700 FOUGHT&COMPANY INC TI D OF PO BOX 23759 131 ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97223 2S 112AB-00700 2S 112AC-008 FOU OMPANY INC TIGA ITY OF PO 2 9 131 S ALL T ARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 7223 2S 112AB-01900 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 2S112AB-02000 T- OUNTY IUSTRIAL PARK I�l► 210. EOCH•.• ST LWAUKIE,OR 9 222 2S 112AB-01901 I-COUNTY IN USTRIAL PAR C 2106 OCO ST WAUKIE, 97222 2S 112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST MS42 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Crag head 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-6210 David Chapman 9840 SW Landau Place Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc) UPDATED: November 1, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,,,,�•�!!, PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping ABetterCommunity TIGARD, OREGON 91223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REQUEST FOR 10 ' 10T ' �. ' RTY` OWNEtill MPA LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. ISI34A8,Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): 5 1 a Idioc), llo/ S w Ba t+a a.,--et jM l fan INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTIN32 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting,you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: 1--1-m -3(a cI/ PHONE: So 3 - " a 64/7 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: • $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE * * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet = $8.00 x 2 sets = $16.00 sheets of labels x $2/sheet = $ '7 x sets = S_C .� sheet(s) 2 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets = $ 4.00 % sheet(s) of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area = $ x / sets = GENERATE LIST = S1 00 GENERATE UST = S TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = I Receipt #: 27200100000000004385 __,,,r,,.a�� Date: 11/02/2001 TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description • Revenue Account No. Amount Due MISC Miscellaneous Fees&Charges-21.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-451000 $21.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check WOLSONVILLE LEARNING TREE/JAMES BLACKWEL 0 3683 $21.00 . TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $21.00 •� � WILSONVILLE LEARNING TREE M t 1L JAMES D. BLACKWELL OR MAISIE CHIN 3683 PH.503-682-3647 2 _O 24-201/1230 (tp R 1tm- 29880 SW TOWN CENTER LOOP WESTDate WILSONVILLE,OR 97070A i Pay to the 4/0 $ �! Order of C) ' uye t G� Dollars 8 Err KeyBank ational Association , onir. Tualatin,National 97062 For -- -- r-— — - '_- .---,....,-....w..._ ....,..,,,,w_ ,....,,m. �,..,,„....- GUARDIAN®SAFETY YELLOW CARVE O�aike gmeAcan CITY of TIGARD 1‘0 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED T.....................\\\N\\\\ (500') <9G � G :� ���_�� FOR: JIM BLACKWELL �� so �, • G•), RE: 2S112AB, 01900&01901 unmans O�`" �� •, A8007o0 251126807300 ..% O: Property owner information LL is valid for 3 months from �� > the date printed on this map. 151120800800 Q a 257120600700 7,1.. `�1." C\ 251121..2000 i� N. mi 251126001000 \ , \ lle \ - r ..`41/4 � 251121001700 2520001200 251175600300 01 �,..kion. �� • I fT7TfIT11MX\ I BONITA RD • 2:1121101111111111N 2srrnla I 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 751178000100 tST12AC00700 291125800700 1-=295 feel 2526000001 791170000800 7' 280004 0 a 41, • - Q City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 T I \ (503)639-4171 http://www.ci tigard or US Community Development Plot date:Nov 21,2000;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR 2&1124C-00700, 2S 112AC-00200 BHK PROPERTIES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 14280 SW 72ND AVE 17010 SW WEIR RD TIGARD,OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 • 2S112AC-00 00 2S112AC-00500 BH R ERTIES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC 14280 W 72ND AVE 17010 SW WEIR RD TIG RD, R 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 • 2S112AC-008 0 2S112A8-02300 BI-IK O ERTIES LLC SHEININ-MENDENHALL LLC I 14280 72ND AVE BY PARROTT PARTNERHIP TIGA 97224 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S112130-00100 2S112AB-01600 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP PO BOX 1890 PO BOX 324 GRESHAM,OR 97030 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S 112AC-00300 2S 112AB-01300 EMPIRE BATTERIES INC TENNANT INVESTORS PO BOX 23962 PO BOX 1658 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97207 • 2S112AB-00700 2S112AB-01200 FOUGHT&COMPANY INC TEN N INVESTORS PO BOX 23759 PO BO 1658 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT ,OR 97207 2S112AB-008002S112BA-06200 XFOU T COMPANY INC TIG D TY OF PO BO 23759 • 1312 HALL TIG D, R 97223 TIG ,OR 97223 2S112BA-00200 2S112AB-01700 LURMANN LLC TIGA'p ITY OF PO BOX 1185 1312 HALL . LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TI ,RD, ►'R 97223 2S112BA-0 00 2S112AC-00801 L A LLC TIG D ITY OF . POB 1185 1312 W HALL • LAK OS EGO,OR 97035 TI RD, R 97223 2S 112AC-00400 2S 112AB-01900 NATIONAL SAFETY CO TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS PARK INC 14480 YORBA 2106 SE OCHOCO ST CHINO,CA 91710 • MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 2S1124B-02000 TRI- OU Y INDUSTRIAL PARK 2106 CHOCO ST MI. AUK ,OR 97222 2S 112AB-01901 TRI- OUN Y INDUSTRIAL PARK 2106 CHOCO ST MIL AUKI , OR 97222 2S112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN ' 111 SE WASHINGTON ST MS42 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 8 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 0 CITY OF TIGARD A . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION •CITY OFnOARo Community iDcvelopment 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD slurpingyl<BetterCommunity TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX 503-684-7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REQUEST 1 R. i3O.0= 001 ' RO ' f^TY OWNE:B, MA LING LINT Property owner information is valid.for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. IS134A8,Tax Lot oo100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): • h'tc ', 257/AA i mo I as / /44- INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit ar the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: 1T) G1t - ( PHONE: 6D 3 - 6 - 3-6 V 7 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus$2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * ..4._ sheets of labels x S2/sheet = $BAOO x sets = $16.00 sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet = $ `-r x v2 sets = S.Y-g sheets of labels x$2/sheet far CIT area x. sets = $4.00 sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = $ x sets = s a GENERATE LIST = $.1.1.00 GENERATE UST = I,LO_0 TOTAL = $31.00 \ TOTAL = $‘9_ WILL CALL/PIC '' Fill out this form completely and attached it securely to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL/ PICK UP area at the Front Counter and file in the appropriate alphabetical slot by last name/company. TO: )(lYv`- Net C°iCc,�-C aL 3(?‘-(7 COMPANY NAME: DOCUMENT NAME: ?S(1? � DIg6Ul (Ago( FROM: ( A/tA. A'1 DEPARTMENT: 1"(Ctrvt-vtcy-lc? DATE TO WILL CALL: /I/ ) /4� FEE: a'1-/ ( cep) If the document is not picked up within 5 working days of the "DATE TO WILL CALL", the document will be returned to the originator. RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: RECEIvi n r,n11 2: ?WI Receipt #: 27200000000000001354 Date: 11/22/2000 TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due RECEXP Recovered Expenditures(labels)-21.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-479000 $21.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check DURHAM LEARNING TREE 0 1372 $21.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $21.00 a :::....,.:....a,,.....:,.,w,......,,:�wa.....:,,..a,...sem_ �.. ., .. ,..,. .:......: .,,,,:...,.:� a,.......:.., ,E 011.6� DURHAM LEARNING TREE L'1l::.. JAMES D.BLACKWELL OR 1372 a MAISIE CHIN J 24-201/1230 A R©P." 18115 LOWER BOONES-FERRY RD.503-BM815 // ` 22-O( 74 �' �' DURHAM,OR 97224 t Pay to the7-1 ,, �� Order of • 1 e4 /TV),d 1 $ t-!cC.7 LtAA G�•-� t. - //D Dollars 8• l.a C � k ' KeyBank National Association y. CTualatin,Oregon 97082 3 h Tualatin, •1 Oregon 0 //' i , . For — — / _ – - a ,: M......:. M,,,....,,.. ..,.....:: ,:.:....:.�� .a.,.....:� ...,..... .., �::,...... ,.:.:,� �:.::...,T �,....,u,. _,G.GUARDIANS SAFETY BLUE• ©Clarke Amerlraa GUPADIAN®SAFEfY BLUE DflBBL CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSALDESC�RIPON y:. 2,A1 ,aam u. . 120 DAYS = 3/27/2002 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00012 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2001-00008 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2001-00027 FILE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL APPLICANT: Jim Waddle OWNER: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Waddle Design/Planning/Architecture Attn: Jack Steiger 1927 NW Kearney Street 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, OR 97209 Portland, OR 97229. PHONE/FAX: (503) 221-2003/503-221-1709 (503) 643-5757 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a Daycare Center within the Light-Industrial zoning district. The 100-year floodplain and floodway encompasses a portion of the site that is proposed to be developed. The applicant has also requested a Lot Line Adjustment between two lots to accommodate the use. LOCATION: The project is located at the corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Court. Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S112AB, Tax Lots 1900 and 1901. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Light-Industrial. ZONE: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales, activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.720, 18.725, 18/45, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II ® TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT:NOVEMBER 28, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: DECEMBER 12,2001 Z HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 14, 2002 TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ['CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ❑ ARBORIST REPORT ► SITE PLAN ® ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ❑ ' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® NOISE ASSESSMENT ® OTHER:MISC. STAFF CONTACT: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 388 r SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW -i�� TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: Julia Hajduk DATE OF PRE-APP.: 11-9-2000 Property Address/Location(s): SW Bonita Rd. & Milton Ct. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 25112AB-01900, 01901 Case No.(s):5 �jf--) I 0 Other Case No.(s):`Jl- te Receipt No.: + frt. Site Size:29,600 square feet • ij Applicatio Ac epted By:U' Applicant'`: Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Date: I �a` O I Address: 301 NW Murray Blvd. Date Determined Complete: City/State: Portland, Oregon Zip: 97229 Rev.8/21/2001 i.\curpin\masters\revised\sdra.doc Primary Contact: Jim Waddle(Waddle Design/Planning/Arch) Phone:503- 221-2003 Fax:503-221-1709 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) (Note: applications will not be accepted Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. (Contact: Jack Steiger) without the required submittal elements) Address: 301 NW Murray Blvd. Phone:503-643-5757 ❑ Application Form City/State: Portland,Oregon Zip: 97229 ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization El) Title Transfer Instrument or Deed * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Copy of Pre Acy1lcation Conf. Notes authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) DX Site/Plot Plan ;3) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this ..(#of copies based on pre-app check list) form or submit a written authorization with this application. E ' Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/7"x 11" S PROPOSAL SUMMARY ❑Applicant's Statement 17 (#of copies based on pre-app c eck list) The owners of record of the subject property request Site CWS Sewer Use Information Card Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): (Distributed/completed at application submittal) construction of 6,480 sq. ft. day care facility Ty CWS Service Provider Letter ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City [ Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits & Notes EL Filing Fee: (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 __ _{>>ng000-$999.999) $1,600.00 i ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000 over the first million) Urban: (See Washington County fee schedule) 1 , List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: Lot Line Adjustment Type 1 Application is being submitted with this application. Sensitive Lands are addressed in this application. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 31st day of October , 20 01 Tri-County Ind ri Park, Inc. By:���4/I4ecretary Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Nov- 14-01 02 : 08P WADD' DESIGN 50^ 721 1709 P . 02 Novi 1 �L11 09 �'y!i M�� vv ii,a� r`,. 5. 221 r4U J4� p. _E DESIGN17Q9 P,02 'r• •••••••••••• IJ u uL • , SENSITIVE LANDS TYPE II or TYPE HI APPLICATION CITY OP • 13135 swpole BOYO„ Nam, OR 07233(503)029-4t?t Ace(503)e$44,297 GENERAL.INFQRMATION PRE-rwp.HEW Wrrrl: ( DATA OF PRS-APF,: ,!-4'-oe, Property AddressILocat on(s): SW itaAct & M.12j.2 . ll ti� Tax Map&Tax Lotfi(s) B-01900301901 ;r.7 x „; y:, • .4 :29,600 square feet ,;; ^ r 'r,fr p;_ ?* z ° Iji,.. ;^•e'. •14.N .ti; .. • __—'-- '..9b. "�J7;;�r. •"-fr n••1 .; •lc�: _�, :. .�r�..y\.( �, .z' as '•;Z '.a.• i,... rte.•,. � Ey.,'a Appposrrr:Tri-County Industrial, Park, Inc. "` ern r', ''°7.4'4''1• + S•�•!F'. ,x44. Address: 301 NW Murray Blvd. • c �•,•• ). ` • •city�t Portland Oregon ED:972291 •, zr'si=� tom ,,, u' r;:.. J" '�'`4f; ,•. , pommy imWDesign/Planing/Arch) ' ,,,jc' 7'};��,y, ?..; i!T I`':�u•_a��•.n',,;rryr `•. Phone503-221-2003 F=503-221-1709 r : ;-•�:; • -:`';: 'n:,- ',,.,.�3:a Propertyarn.rlO�d Hold« � -111111110•1vtom •, valtsch rbt emcee than mai Ridatfiragjjakinaajawarilikal Tri-County Industrial Par, Inc. (Contact: Jack Steigez prole; opploadonewillggeb000tepited rheum the repelled subsilldt elsoll tit) Aadrsss: GtyIStatsPetci t 1,oregon Zip: 97229 © App$oadon Perm ❑ Owner's SignaturaWraten August:86m When the caner and the eporu:ant are different people,the applicant a Tido Transfer rnononont or Deed must be the purchaser of roma or i twee in possealtan with written authorization from the owner of so agent of the owner. TM owner(s) Cl Copy of PreAppHcmdon Conf..Notes must Sian this appreation in the epees provided on the back of this a SiteiPletPlatt kern or submit a voider,eu le(stion with this spotioetlon, pies swim tineas on map es*tet) PRIVINIALJUNIIIAM ❑ altattelot Plan(reauped 8%rc 111 ' The owners of record of the subject property request a Sensitive ' 0 Appfteenrs elaternent Lands Permit to allow(please be specific): t�ldaepia t►tssd on on►anp e construction of 6,480 sq. ft. day care facility �❑ Sew t CWS Sernfotmahon Card ? 411 _ Q CWS BeMee Provider Lefler -- --- - - "r Lj 2 Betz: of Pas drwsedlPnleaternbed tae Copy h C y AY • herList by .._�. 0 Neighborhood M .Altidewts i Notes 0 Filing Fee(*m iisfttiow) $ 7 A° (►learini'a OAiar) $1,240.00 1 Nov- 14-01 02 :09P WADED, DESIGN 507 '21 1709 P _03 Nov-13-O109- 37A WA _E DESIGN 5 221 1Aii;" ..•,; P_03 List tiny VARIANCE. CONDITIONAL USE,SENSITIVE LAMD , OR OTHER LAND 115E ACTIONS to be considered as put of this application: Sensitive Lands are addressed in this application. APPLICANTS:To oonslder an application complete, you win need to submit ALL of the QEQUIRtI SUIl1MMAELaMLNTS es described an the front of this .- in the"Re• lead Submittal Elements*bee. (Dstedod Submittal Ptequirement Intonation sheets can be Obtained.upon request for all types of Land Use Applications_) THE APPUCANT(S)SHALL CSRTIPYTHAt • Ibit.albete ..._ .. • • .,• .0 be . -• • 'J., .•1.1 ,•.•41, the sub OL S!'4t?ll�f. ' • If the application is®ranted.the applicant Will exercise the rights granted in ftcoeftaance with Pe terms N1d subject to all the concrtfiana and limitations Of the approve l • Ali of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhiaks tronmotted herewith, we We:and ftp applicants so acknovAiedge that my permit Issd.teased on this application, may be rerok•d If II is found that any such statements aro Value. • The applicant has reed Me entire contents of the appal+. indudh9 fne pandas end arlcria, and understands i+o requirements for approving or denying the appl$Cation. SIGNATURES elle owner of the$ubJaet property. • • DATED this 13th day of l ovtntbar ,20 01 Tri-C. . 7 Industrial 'ark, rem. 9 rotary ip '* �Owneet s it re Sandra ' . Poslick etert•S owner's Algrrature - Owner's Signature 2 .1.2/08/'4000 09: 59 FAX 5036647297 City 0r Tigard- LQjuu-t LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A dot L::;•I1i TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX(503) 684-7297 Ca-Q,-Q-ila' HI5a40I - OOo -- OENERAI,1N F0M M Oi-k9A. ; 5\ 2 OO (-oa4a 0k -�I —O©QO r4ri1i�Gj.�L,'1 PRE-APP. HELD WfTH: Julia Hajduk Property Address(s): NE Corner, SW Bonita Rd- & SW M;l tnn DATE OF PRE-APP,: 11-9-2000 Ct. , Lot 1 , Bonita Industrial Park j5 Tax Map 8 Tax Lot 112AB-01901 , 01900 ��,(•�.iti i�j c t Property Owner(s). Tri-County Industrial Perk, Jnc_ _ rCj' ,i';:7/.77.-:':,,...::::;---A 'JiF �� Address: 301 NW Murray Blvd. Phone5O3-643-5757 i 4 ~i�' M;. r,. b Portland, Oregon Zip: 97229 F ixiji) ii6ct'.-� i� ir..c,_t. _ — .,�.-•i City: - '- Property Address(s):i5W Mi 1 ton (-It_ • Lot/, Bonita Lndugrrial T,i ir:: i :ioCr`er c c1 170t J Park .:,•, i'-° ''� _. r, ': ...- , ,.l •"; `-4}' e Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2S 1 12AB-02000, 1901 , 1900 Property Owner(s): •- . • •• • - •. • Address: 301 NW Murray Blvd. Phone503-643-5752 -E• RED BM in •L E_ ME It s (Note: applications will not be accepted City: Portland, Oregon Zip: 97229 Jazit without the required submittal elements) Applicant*/Agent:Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Steiger Address: 301 NW Murray Blvd. Phone:503_643-5757 Application Form City: Portlandi0regon Zip: 111! - Owner's Signature/Written Authorization _ 97229 - I © Title Transfer lnstru • -nt or Deed 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant G reiiminary Map (- •ies) must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Arte/Plot Plan (6 copies) authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/�"x 11") must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. g" Applicants Statement(6 copies) El Filing Fee (City) o205).$100.0_0 PROPOSAL SUMMARYI (Urban) $236.00 The owners of record of the subject property request Lot Line Adjustment permission to adjust: - two parcels of43,546 sq nd 66, 184 sq ft (number) (acreage or square footage) into two parcels of 80, 130 sq end 29,600 sq f t (number) (acreage or square footage) 1 L208it000 09:59 FAX 50368.17297 City of Tigard X7005 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: This applicationbeing along is submitted with a Site Development Application. Applicant proposes to develop a Learning Tree Day Care Center on the site. Sensitive Lands are addressed in said a. .lication. • TAPPL1CANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRESU D BMfTTA LE ENTS as i described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. j (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ▪ The_above request does not viol to an •eed stri io s th, ma be at.che.. to or i .osed .on e su•'ect property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to a;l the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found tn : any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 8th _day of December , , 2000 Tri—County Industrial Park, Inc. Owner's Signature Milton 0. Brown, President Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Receipt #: 27200100000000004404 Date: 11!06/2001 TIDEMARK P1I.ECOPY COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MIS2001-00027 [LANDUS]Lot Line Adjustment 100-0000-438000 $20.00 SDR2001-00012 [LANDUS]Site Development Rev 100-0000-438000 $1,600.00 SLR2001-00008 [LANDUS]APPLICATION FEE 100-0000-438000 $250.80 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC. 0 4044 0 $1,870.80 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $1,870.80 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC US BANK 4044 2106 SE OCHOCO STREET MAIN OFFICE MILWAU OR 97222 PORTLAND,OR 97208 PHONE(503503)654-1136 24-22/10 a **** ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY AND 80/100 DOLLARS TO THE ORDER OF 10/23/01 $1, 870. 80*** City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 NOV. 2.2001 4:07PM SUNNYSIDE CUST SERV NO. 162 P.3/4 r POIM . f41.Y1aa111 AND LAW DIED llrtlrN..I H C.,,._,.I.I. .�.�nraap■., Waal. .. ,. r .■, , �,r ail' DAI OAiN ass lAtll P1W {'Jji 1 �w _ KNOW ALL MEN SY TRUE PRXSEN2S,Thet..,.,,.1.CPP,..gr-,AX4001,-.................._.,.-.,,.,.......,.,..,,.•,_- , '�� __... ...,hara(eteftar called grantor, =_ 4 /AI Ulu conaidaration herelnaiter elated,does hereby Grant,harden. ed(and Convey unto,. „ ,,,. Tri,Count:y_poduati al, isr,ka,.Tint f t harain11160 celled grandee, and unto franfee'I Mks,eueeourora and aeefjns all of that certain real properly;Oh the �a�N�• (anernartti, haredltemenfe Gild aPpurfnnencei !hereunto belonging or In anywise apperfalning,gloated in the Comity iluyhilgtot,••..-„,,,.•,,State of Oregon,deeorihadae follows,Iowa': - , 1 Vii!-,'�� _ Lots 1 through 8,BONITA INDUSTRIAL PARK,In the County of Waehington:end State of Oregon. e- L PARCEL II ;P• L L. � : NOV. 2.21 4:08PM SUNNYSIDE CUST SERV NO. 162 P.4/4 tafiaislirre•••.••••••••••••—•—•— •••••, .... • • I . ., . • — ,. .7.7.7... ,. .. • martiwesw • -.....____: ' . .. Hillilnallibe ---• . . .. . =.'•"---L ......... I . =... Ellift".. ;. Margaiffigr' ' - ...: ........=iir= 1......lingiar • • . .=7421PrInal : - 111111211?;, . fowl gem a'.—ACMNOVOLLIMPIENT STATE OP OREGON, } IITMIINII.N11111 Law OM CO.POIMANa.Oil IR •' ''.':.' '', •i . .0, 2.• L: Eh Washington ,„'lli•::;!..c !. County or„ ')1,-‘.:--i:,:'(•'" ,3•:;kr IV t•......., ' . BE IT REMEMBERED, That on!hie. — .5th day of ...„.. 4.t.Ifte..... ....... •-••••—..... 19...954 4"1,(•,,t1f. ' 1 briar° ma,the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for said County and State,personally appeared the within • 4,4;:„i, 1 ! named... .....,......0111tom.4....firgawn-......------.......—-,..—•.................—...........-----—.............."........' '''''' to C..-6...... .................•.........,,......,......................... ... ..•,.. .....r......... ...............,„........,.......,......,.,..........,............ ...........................t ''..4....' . . . . • known to me to be the identic,91 individual_ described in and who executed the within instrument and 3•:•.,,i)%1•: ' acknowledged to Ina that. . . 1!e. ,. .executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WNEREOP,I have hereunto eat My hand and ellised - ray °Wei I the day and year Iasi abort! Men. ?C :. 1 SAND) PkleK - ' •;e/ NOTARY R1JBLIC•OREogot Ortggh . UON COM4115510N NO. 02400 My Commlielon-Oldies •; • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 15,1927 .... ..... . ... _X_ .. ......__ ary:Pitblic l— —.tel.71 . ' -•I .1.V i 1 . rit • . . , . ..•1°‘.t •I . . ' . • V.. . ,. ...1) .. . . . ' . • , .., .. , - I 7 O 5 .. . • _ li.,•.:..• 77:1-7.1...... ..,...,Lo. ......7.77.77.77....... . ...".".%T.n..a..04.1.11,..111./1, .... 0 • .° -•°....-•............1/1.......1”...,•1••••••••40.1.0.....7...7..'..."‘r7.t."..rn.""r.,. . . ..... . •••.,1.•.11,,q.cs:Y!°''°' .'' .' • • . .. - . • "'' - • " .'' •... 'Z.',,° . . $ . •••.:A.*.'•;-,-,:',,,';'•i.:0,-....1: : • •-• •'.. ., •,. • 4 . • . • ' • • . .. ::•.4.%j:t;'.:`.;;;;:14..:_1.5::....:.;.%:......:_:..;—... •.....:)_.;..• .• • •(' . t: ••• , ! : '!•••,..' •_, , .'•',;',1,'....•.:"?. : f,I: ,.. , • , ... .. ,..,:'..4.•,.id4•••i'r:..;. "-• 1.. ,., .,' • -.J .. ' • • 47-1.,..1,,, , •:•.....-: : - ,. ,: ' • ., '' , • • - . • 4...:...•71', ••:-..,..•'.o'i.p.,,"•,..•,., , • •• -...;• • •,, . --•Cril?',a1., .•• , .•. ••,.. •. . . ,., • (I ' 1 'or 1 tft;Wil"Nr.'1)4.71 . te;2• .;••?1, 1••: •• . , I ,. ' ••:'1•;1'•`•.•,•E..•-• ';' 5..:•:*'",.:./e1-,d,:•:.:*".*:'-2•''•")"....!-'"*.-*;.!•:ri:,i*.L7';',.j.• •.4,„...1. ., .. .T__-....•!.....-. •r•..,,,•-,;•,;:1, -• --:,••••• •-••••• •••';••t-t•"....i...L.4-1...! ••.:,! L'1-sL2'.. ,,,;,.i.. ..45-11 •:!..:1••-k," - .1:-....r"' , : •- 17 7..• .., ' :', •• .. 7- , . • •...;_'I",...7..?1 :-.F t--": """."': .... .:•.-, r.,`•i•,;7..1! 7-:•,..Vlarx. • • CITY OF TIGARD November 27, 2001 OREGON Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Attn: Jack Steiger 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, OR 97229 RE: Learning Tree Day School SDR2001-00012, SLR2001-00008, and MIS2001-00027 Completeness Letter Dear Mr. Steiger, The City of Tigard received your application for a Site Development Review and Lot Line Adjustment on November 2, 2001 and the additional application for a Sensitive Lands Review on November 14, 2001. The application has been deemed complete on November 27, 2001. The subject property is identified as 2S112AB, Tax Lots 01900 and 01901. This letter is to inform you that your application has been scheduled for review. A tentative hearing date for the application is scheduled for January 14, 2002. Once the Hearings Officer renders his decision, the file is subject to a ten-day appeal period. Although your application is complete, additional materials may still be necessary in order for the Hearings Officer to make an informed decision. I would add that the Tigard Development Code prohibits schools within the Light Industrial zoning district. In order to avoid any confusion during the process, I would suggest changing the name of the project to the Learning Tree Day Care. In your current application materials, you reference off-site mitigation for the wetland on proposed lot 2. If you intend to fill the wetland and develop proposed lot 2, you will need to schedule a pre-application conference. Filling the wetland involves an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and you should be aware that an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan is subject to City Council review, and could take up to four months. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, contact me at (503) 639-4171, x388. Sincerely, Brad Kilby Associate Planner cc: Jim Waddle, 1927 NW Kearney St., Portland, OR 97209 Land use case file No. SDR2001-00012, MIS2001-00027, and SLR2001- 00008 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 1 PLANNER' IPPLICATION COMPLETE. .SS GUIDE PRIOR TO FORWARDING FOR SET-UP • Tidemark Project Data Entry (within 5 days of receipt) • Completeness/Incompleteness Letter (within 30 days of receipt) • When A Project Is Accepted As Complete And Forwarded To The Planning Secretary For File Set-Up, Please Verify That The Following Items Are Included: Land Use Proposal Description: (verify with check mark the materials submitted) ❑ File Number(s) u' Project Name ❑,.120 Days (Count the day accepted as day one) �f Applicant(s) Name and Address t Owner(s) Name and Address ❑ Any Additional Parties to the Application you Want to Receive Notice (Rep./Attorney, Engineer/Consultant, etc) Ir Description of the Proposed Project(s) ❑ Map(s) and Tax Lot(s) and their Corresponding Addresses o Applicable Review Criteria o CIT Area—not"Citywide" unless application is for a CPA or 10A(CIT area can be found in Permit* Plan-Parcel information) ❑ Date of Public Hearing or Projected Date to Issue the Decision (Planner to set date/confirm with Hearings Officer/Planning Commission/City Council, if applicable) Request For Staff/Agency Comments Notification Sheet: o Applicable (complete a check-off sheet to include agencies/staff you want to receive a notice) u N/A DLCD Notice (CPA's/ZOA's): u Applicable (complete Notice of"Proposed Amendment" NOW! Complete Notice of"Adoption" or"Withdrawal", as applicable) ❑ N/A Application Materials: (NOTE: this is a generic list only) cw"Signed Land Use Application air"Copy of Warranty or Deed to Verify Ownership -"Written Property Owner Authorization From ALL OWNERS if Applicant is NOT the Owner -Narrative ❑ Appropriate Number of Materials for Request for Comments for ALL Hearing Bodies IsrPlans Folded to Approximately 8.5" x I I" Le'8.5" x I I" Reproducible Site Plan o Revised Plans Clearly Marked as Revised, Including Revision Dates (applicant is responsible for pulling/replacing/folding plan sheets in all sets of revised plans prior to application acceptance) ❑ LIST IN REPRODUCIBLE MAILING LABEL FORMAT Containing the Names and Addresses of All Property Owners Within 500'. If the Property Owner list is Not City Generated, Certification that the List Reflects All Property Owners Within 500 Feet of the Subject Site(s) is Required From the Agency that Generated the List ❑ 2 Sets of Self-Addressed (no return address), $0.33 Stamped #I0 Envelopes. If Applicant is Using a Postage Meter, NO DATE is to be Printed on the Envelopes, Only Postage. u Additional Materials Required in Pre-Application Notes Pre-Application Conference Notes And Materials: u Applicable (Pull original from Planning Secretaries lateral file cabinet(bottom file drawer) by the Section Number) u N/A is\curpin\masters\application completeness checklist 2S-Aug-99 03/14/2001 15:15 9687492 DURHAM LEARNING TREE PAGE 01 Jt r. L. •• 11/22/00 `"i �- Re: Learning Tree Day School Dear Interested Party: I am representing the owner of the property at tax lot 01900 & 01901, Map#2S 112AB, located on Bonita Road bordering Southern Pacific Railroad on the east and SW Milton Way on the west. The owner of the property and I are proposing to develop a Learning Tree Day School at this location. Prior to applying to the city of Tigard for necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, December 7th,2000 Friends Church of Tigard 15800 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 6:30 P.M. Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-682-3647 if you have any questions. Sincerely, i Jim Blackwell Owner, Learning Tree Day School OCT.30.2001 1.58PM TRI COUNTY IND. PK. NO.318 P.18/27 MINUTES On December 7,2000, at 6:30 p.m.,a Neighborhood Meeting concerning the proposed Learning Tree Day School at Lot 1,Bonita Industrial Park was held at: Friends Church of Tigard 15800SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR Jack Steiger,representing the owner Tri-County Industrial Park,Inc., and Jim Blackwell, owner of the Learning Tree Day School,were present. No other parties arrived to attend the meeting. Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. Steiger Property Administrator t I'-'V. C'.2000 ?t F'!1 TP. _<7UrITI IND. F'I'. HO.S21. P. - -- , AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE iTknw .-fp-�T t;) E'•il60-\i-. .. 'S+r4I,•'a fl :i'� Ri, --,T:'�tC:47]-1-:`ti'rFcfs A-' vii.5.,..---- i " 'Wirtiit?pg.D i i 1.Nxt.. ' .'' !!.J SW:1- 0.1X1 1 , , var 'hp,1 rl; to t , i —�CwlieS BLQ-e1,a0 di (a ' . , - l–e w IZ i rz 1 it_P� . C a.j om- 5--. 6.-70/. _ i : is^ i orli.5;) if ,. .Z?;,< /els 69(goo O/70/ 7-11a/777,25-//,./V-/S , )- v,ct Al 0 o e- b_?r <',tae' . iii6b. e9-0- lrQ IkoQ . /I . / /;:.--Aef/ (' f;��• OFFICIAL SEAL f () : "w f".. DEBBY LISWCOQV ( ,,(0- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ) , ' (/ COMMISSION N0.063518 () MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AP�RIrL 0�2��() i � GL (t°200 1 (Apritcani, pi2ase ,;otr,;,! to ;,:formation below for 1:rcl�er placement with prol',o. 2d prujecl) ,N'AM( 01' PROJECT OI: PROPOSE ) tiAM1;: »--- ITYPI; Of"I'1tOI'OSI;I) DEVELOI'rjf N•C: - Nautc of�1;t% ca!t uUt7wncr: -- _ I +A.dd ress or Genera! Lo:atio (A-Subject.I'rohcrty: I LSut,ject hruperly 1'n>; f�4ait(s)and 1..a10i(s)'--- u __.,�-- W — _ ' — ti voq+.,Viaeerw:tc-sl,,y,e,st,“ .moi AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 1 - es kW�1 NouC c-,) . Jfl J�x /0715 v19ce, 0./.2'0/ l/y1c 2 -44 c //,Z • 0 presence of Notary Public) 0-1-4!,; CGt Fi(1': �C'.f.' 4 Cr 1 ',f ('PPrra1\! ,JC`!YArY P! 'f'r t, r r '".4 P!tYr!\': t-r 1 R!7€1 OFFICIAL SEAL DEBBY LIEW f) tor COMMISSIONLNO 063516 ()NOTARYfkb () MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL Oh,2001 (Applicant. pic3Se COs'I t iatOt'1 slRCip+l I,?Civw CO"propel placement with proposed rri acct.) NAME OE P tOJ6,C':'Olt I'ItOi'OSii1) NAME..,--- — ,TYPE OF PROPOSED !?!•'.'11?LOPMEN'r Nanto of ApplianiJOwncr: 1 Address or Cortez-Al Loo..-ttieis of-Subject()roomy! LSubject Property Tux Map(s)and 1.o;,u(s): • worm: 2S112AC-00700 2S112AC-00200 p. BHK PROPERTIES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO 14280 SW 72ND AVE 17010 SW WEIR RD TIGARD, OR 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112AC-00 00 2S112AC-00500 BH R ERTIES LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC 14280 W 72ND AVE 17010 SW WEIR RD TIG RD, R 97224 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112AC-008 0 2S112AB-02300 BHK O ERTIES LLC SHEININ-MENDENHALL LLC I 14280 72ND AVE BY PARROTT PARTNERHIP TIGA 97224 12725 SW 66TH AVE#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 1126 D-00100 2S112AB-01600 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA SUNDAY SCHOOL'FELLOWSHIP PO BOX 1890 PO BOX 324 GRESHAM,OR 97030 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S112AC-00300 2S112AB-01300 EMPIRE BATTERIES INC TENNANT INVESTORS PO BOX 23962 PO BOX 1658 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97207 2S112AB-00700 2S112AB-01200 FOUGHT&COMPANY INC TEN N INVESTORS PO BOX 23759 PO BO 1658 TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTA ,OR 97207 2S112AB-00800 2S112BA-06200 FOU T COMPANY INC FOU D TY OF PO BO 23759 13125 HALL TIG D, R 97223 TIG ,OR 97223 2S112BA-00200 2S112AB-01700 LURMANN LLC TIGA CITY OF PO BOX 1185 1312 HALL LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TI RD, R 97223 2S112BA-0 00 2S112AC-00801 L A LLC TIGA D ITY OF POB 1185 1312 W HALL LAK OS EGO,OR 97035 TI RD, R 97223 2S112AC-00400 2S112AB-01900 NATIONAL SAFETY CO TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS PARK INC 14480 YORBA 2106 SE OCHOCO ST CHINO,CA 91710 • MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 �• Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 • Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue • Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street • Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 1220.5 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 • Proposal/Narrative • 12a. Landscape materials are in accordance with 18.745. The development will have no less than 15% of the gross site area landscaped. 13. Drainage has been designed to appropriate standards by licensed Civil Engineer. 14.Accessibility requirements and facilities for the disabled will be in accordance with ORS chapter 447. 15. Provisions of the underlying zone are met. Chapter 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) A pre-application conference was conducted on November 9, 2000. Notes resulting from the conference have been complied with. A neighborhood meeting was held on December 7, 2000. Documents pertinent to the meeting are submitted as part of this submittal. The impact study required by this chapter is a part of this submittal. The required application formand fees accompany this submittal. Chapter 18.410 (Lot Line Adjustments) The required application and documentation is part of this submittal. Chapter 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) The current zoning is I-L (Light Industrial). Proposed development is in compliance with the Development Standards Table 18.530.2. Chapter 18.705 (Access/Egress/Circulation) The proposed design meets all requirements for vehicular access and maneuvering, fire department access and maneuvering, and public walkways. Chapter 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) The proposed development creates no environmental impacts addressed by the provisions of this chapter. Refer to comments in the Impact Study, below. Chapter 18.745 (Landscaping &Screening Standards) Landscape buffering to adjacent properties is not required. Street trees are provided along SW Bonita Road. Internal landscape trees and buffering of the parking areas is provided. Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) Enclosure for trash and mixed solid waste and recycling storage meeting the minimum requirement criteria for industrial uses are provided as depicted on the site development plan. Chapter 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) Required on-site parking is provided. Loading zone is not required. Access drive is designed in accordance with Chapter 18.705. Clear vision requirements of Chapter 18.795 are met. Chapter 18.775 (Sensitive Lands Review) A Natural Resources Assessment has been performed and submitted to Clean Water Services, which has resulted in their issuance of the required Service Provider Letter, attached to this submittal. Schott & Associates has completed a wetland delineation which is shown on the site plan. They have also made recommendations for mitigating the identified,wetland area. The Division of State Lands has reviewed the delineation report and issued a letter of concurrence, attached. Chapter 18.780 (Signs) Required signage permits will be applied for separately, and are not a part of this submittal. Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal) Only one existing large tree requires removal, due to it's location within the only permitted access to the site. The requirement of an Arborist's report was waived by the Planner at the Pre-Application Conference. A significant number of new trees are provided along SW Bonita Road and within the proposed parking area. Chapter 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas) Visual clearances are maintained at the access driveway intersection, and all on-site private vehicular circulation intersections. Brian Reger has observed the existing transformer located just South of the site access drive and has stated that it is not a problem for the vision triangle requirement. Chapter 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) The requirements of this chapter are met and documented on the Site Dimension Plan, the Grading Plan and the Utility Plans. Impact Study The proposed re-development of this site will result in a number of significant benefits and improvements to the environment and existing infrastructure: Traffic: The transportation system impact is improved by this project insofar as the access to the property is now proposed to be located off SW Milton Court, removing previous access off SW Bonita Road. Utilities: Water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems have been evaluated. Refer to the Civil Engineering drawings which are part of this submittal. Water Resources and Sensitive Lands: A wetland delineation has been completed for the affected portion of the property to the North of this site, and a mitigation plan developed. Clean Water Services and the • Division of State Lands have both reviewed the proposed course of action and issued their concurrence requirements. Solar Access: The building height is less than 20 feet in a zone that permits up to 45 feet, measured to the ridge of a low-slop roof. Site Pollution: The site will be re-developed as a children's day school and this proposed use poses no risks of pollution. Noise and Odor: The re-development of the site will result in reduction in odors characteristic of the original farm use. Off-site sources have been evaluated for impact on the site by Burton Engineering & Survey Co. and none found. A site noise assessment has been conducted by Daly/Standlee & Associates, Inc. and found off-site noise to be at an acceptable level. These reports are submitted as attachments to this submittal. Attached Materials: Lot Line Adjustment application and documentation Wetland Report: Schott and.Associates Offsite Landscape/Mitigation Plan: Schott and Associates DSL Concurrence Letter Site Noise Assessment Daly,.Standlee & Associates, Inc. Environmental Impact Assessment Burton Engineering & Survey Co. Clean Water Services Provider Letter • • TRY-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK;INC. 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND, OREGON 97229 RECEIVED PLANNING • 503-643-5756 FAX 503-626-0621. N O V Q 2 2001 CITY OF T GAR I . December 8, 2000 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Applicant is the owner of Lots 1 &2, Bonita Industrial Park. Lot 1 is-a 66,184 square foot parcel andLot2 is a 43,546 square foot parcel. Lot.1 has an older dwelling unit and barn and Lot 2 is undeveloped. To the north of Lot 2 on Lots 3, 4, and 5 there is a concrete tiltup office and distribution building which is approximately ' 4 years old. Under a separate application,Applicant is proposing to demolish the house and barn on Lot 1 and build a Learning,Tree Day School.The day school will only utilize 29,600 square feet of Lot 1, which will leave 35,584 square.feet•of Lot 1 available for further development. In order to better utilize the remainder of Lot 1 forindustrial development,Applicant proposes to • adjust the lot line between Lots 1 and 2 so that the remainder of Lot 1 is added to Lot 2.which will result in Lot2 being 80,130 square feet. Therefore Lot 1 will have one building rather than two. This will be beneficial to Tigard because it will allow a larger building on Lot 2 which will enhance Lot 2's potential for development, which will in turn increase the potential for getting a . new building on the tax rolls and creating new jobs. - . • • • 1. Owner: Tri-County Industrial Park,Inc. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland,Oregon 97229 / Contact: Jack Steiger 503-643-5757 %, 503-5756(voice mail) III / eLOT! 503-626 0621(fax)4I •/ Ie191 2. Land Su veyor: Development&Construction Services,Inc. ! 11 e� �!�+`• 339 W.Main St.ATjo7 Hillsboro,Oregon 97123-3947 4,. Contact: John Peterson S '� �� 503-648-4959 O `,���/ es 503-640-9385(fax) � \ „ 3. Parcel Size: Existing Lot 1-43,546 S.F. Lot 2-66,184 S.F. \�'% g Proposed Lot 1-29,600 S.F. Lot 2.80,139 S.F. k u-! / 111 4. Deed: i% '. \ Is Restrictions: None C�45*01•5• / • LOT I a \ q e 11045 5wn4[ ,.N.1] 141▪.. i3 52 ii••w] ..[ y( PROPOSED NEW AREA, \ a i5'0.au 1=• w J. C OS SO-FT. rQ O slaw YAAwolt u6x5 w. 15005 it• w L ilaa! IY w ,! I LOT I \• ® CA101 BASIN 150]6 Y 130.68 12'le w LEGEND • o ,10.]0 2.an 12. COHTRQ PONT I II \� e 03404 1 1.... ]160 ILL 1!150 IY 0117 GTOI BA9N ISt)! ]0..S ]•�T S• S.W. 12151 Ir WT .ltt{ I O ASwW YANNOIE II� x I .\, I W O UNWARY YANNOLL ASPHALTE EIEVATIONs eAan 04 rA9uNOTM COUNTY eENa PARR Na 444 CONCRE■ GIFN BASH 1 �1_ � ' \` DEsWPTOM: ELEV.-,.... •• €011 Roo 1� Tom I II 1 \ 0910 BRAS!0194 w W1(NEIE 9055 4-AT DIE NOIITNI0 (MCA $ �Wz.YANHO E OF THE 1440 04 564]3 ROAD 01Q I-5.1 FOOT GST 15 INC NEST - 1 ,D / I .\ EM K ME BIIUOF,1 I/1 FEET NORTH or 01E HORiN CURa • A OAS VAAL r F -PQ- POC INE I/ Y 035 LINE-GAS m I OlA fuw I • a Po0fl""pc. I ' ::'14' :'':14':14'. -.-.- 0001 LE %/ ��� A:'::::::.:::::.> I \ CURVE DATA 0 GN PEO STK OUVLL / Y W .:.:.:'...':..':.' I • \ CURVE DELTA RApY! MC CNaRn CNDRD BEARING -�„y �¢ :::: !!:' I CI 00•1000• 17]6.]5 Iain 10.s s 11,5'Ir C CO lev's0• 50100 66.57 60.11 •10]7x•W ®-APPLE 8 :�:.: �1 ! \ CO 105a3!• 1756.75 51151 51265 51705'54•C ®_NA10111101E -VIII--VEA2O1 LM Eill 1 �� \ • T-FIRE HYDRANT• Fiji 04 vK�c • i, ,-,. I f 717. ■��/� COnfT1UCTI0t1°9 FM PIPE =IMOE FJ%% .! to LOT 4I Gv-. fe�vlcealne. \ ."Tian amVila 114n...-.146 anI! Mg ��r, PIBOP08ED NEW 41FE 4 \ I xf8_DEaouaxi /�; 2%600 SGL FT. I \ \ m !Oooe66 %� 18 Ras 14�.m>RT 0.001. // "r -- 04.x•.64. ARR \ 4)44 A =��-��_ 1JiY7t 1414 s :BE. •--.--PGE'. . 1414.1414 14... � � - _ O�� ', '.•:... we • ... 1414...: 6 1417.75 fill MITA 0000 t1101017 ado.735) 0 q ■q s yup q //� A A 5 A 11 1 O I ' e' ��O O 02 ate'I� 4 A1.1 CITY oF a luARD • • \ TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY \ FOR rRI CWNTY INDUSTRIAL PARR INC IN THE N LOT 1.%• IONITA 110u51121.PARK. fir. OTT.110.00 10 4DIN THE N.L 03CCTd 12,res.R,W,W.N. WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON • \ �r SCALE r-20• SEPT.27.2000 NOTE TABLE \ NOTE DESCRIPTION RIM REV LE.EL. NTE ROW ■py �,,, gf LOT 2 / .11.12. la 20 b O STORY YANHCE 1520 L 1.0.1 4'OUII T 0 eR /i' ° ` ' • 5L 140.0 I]' i,/� I a o SMITHY MANHOLE ,52..1 Y 137.61 12• U I 131..1 2• IN A 281 1 v1 12' w • I CONTROL POINT TABLE 0 SANITARTCHY BAN" 0345 E. ;":59 12•"T Di' N1Ne iMVAUMHOIE '.1aa • 13.0 15•' 'TSS`D•Y I EnPK SCMPndNATER m2e1>•Nr 5 ,�5 u•o STERN Y TINGLE 0.75 ID'o„Ty66gp 1r o NPui AIL 136.67 r8 9 SUMTd aesx 1110. ,2:oNr p , 4 �'� 2 • 8 TMT uMMOLE ,37.68 N.W."M 13,0.98 12.OUT DPI 1�i� - ` X00 RED CONTROL CM t15.e� O SANITARY MANHOLE ;b.w PLC 122.86 . a�.; 442 RED CONTROL CM 139.98 .56 Y NT Q SMITHY NANHOE 136.]7 N.w 12107 I /� NOTES: .5T IV Our ��, �•��wr 9L NOWLN EwGtEN GOOP GOWNED VDT ® 9TONiARY xHOIE S L 100 1'_ouT pi 1... LLrr [NeERRIE3 N 1:'45 Ey +' g \\ ,,, PIPES- 3 To E®q.Evcco Ed ® 10110 NMxOL£xOE 1]81. Nw: Ana 13366•INT E7uV� Are INE 1 PES-Yru 1Ea1AL noNNc TH ® s 1„ i0xae 1z. 329 I•OUT li _ _ , -BWNOMr PER Pur OR'BdPTA6 S 133.21)9 1]• w / y 3 wWSTxAL PARK' CATER BASIN 13566 L 0x36 12'OUT F NI ���Jll § SICRRLI MANHOLE 133•56.31 N. iii18 ii•OuT �>/'eJ-..1. R1 �. A S 1311.,' 13: �lL. 1 Y w• iPACT 9' 130. QAI I,` 0 STORY Y NH0.E ,36.2] E 1 .03 12• INE 1]0.1] 12'11: v UT 130.13 12' wirO ` 11 O STERN u6NHOLE 116.25 N.L 130.05 1i• rwiV 130.05 12. Pi +2.70 12'NT Lar 1 1111.. 03 CATER BASIN I3S.70 N 1293. Ir V&I t LEGEND CATER TI0575W1111: �z.Nr/ SM TM ANNOLE +1338 N E. ,219 2' $p CONTROL PONT ,/ � I 6.W. 12154 12'OUT 9 F hl b SAHTARY 0 STORM MANHOLE "ANN0.E i 1 1 E1CA 1 I I \ ELEVATIONS BASED d WASHINGTON COUNTY Bdd NARK NO.b. -Y • Mrd BANK // •J • �� DESCRIPTION: ELEV..119484 Q • Rd RCO i/,'/ .�•� 1 0.0 BRASS NW IN CdCAETE NOERAUN AT THE"dT1.EST CORNEA 2 NEA12ON uAHHOE • OR THE BRIDGE ON BONITA ROAD 01011-5 1 TWT EAST OP DIE PEST ,,,,11 p NAA.BON i END OE THE BRIDGE.I I/2 FEET NORTH d'THE NCR.WRO. Hai ]o /� i b GAS F1NN - P0P`"A'i°i %f"/ � r 1.::::::::::::::::;:,4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: CURVE DATA F:-:-._.- OEADNAN �' -• CATV P ETER ' •I ® 1 •-.- 1 CURVE DELTA RAMS MC dOR0 .CRO BEARING ▪ POLL NETEII ;; i I ' .- Ii 1, C2 18•5559' 50500 186.67 66.12 N 10'35. W• 1 C3 1098'59' 1716.7] 32]32 12x45 5,711531'E• K HAY/TITRE. i • 1 1+ ININ _ WF = Jj- rORWT I 11'1POLE 90ED- C�V�LOr.�nT'L '�/tb-INA ALAE N. LAND&YR.,. con)T9UCrI on a �' 1 uIwce).inc.wd APE X61 CAS NE OON 0631 00-056® ces MErEn y/ �� 1 °a '"`�°'°or9o1 WR© RIM0�1 / `�// `' '1 JOHN YiesPETERSON Sd ` U-0E000cus II �} ,E��4'ill . L RENEWAL 12/31/CO JOB 1 000.016 1i1 11 II ;��v.>t ,6.o.N D„N.,AE�N.s_.� s � j/ �w`."�� ,a,�..,�,<A,PAa.a o aaa • A -A `� '/� I_/ % �i.�/� j/// //I i�j/� /:%/��i46, %%% __ °m-- ¢ Wp -------' ll BMT.WAD (03,6.1"'2✓d0/15EI E N{ a anT 1 A Al R T A R A A \ 1i 1 O I 1`. °1 1\ A1.1 • PROJECT TEAM 2.PIM PANTO,m.! WILL — Cll. m-aL.nT.QLTOIAL 1,41.(INC. YR WI PI AT MSCPORT-40,MM..41. I PANTAtR -eCeSt DIRECT LN •03-64...1146 nAu. ^��� -w-n..wIa nee. •011-62.-0•21C \•-•..L 1 rNne imam.W rort.�T,.uoc.nblla sue sNPuwPAo AO�w.CT, WOOL!0fla4 rLAn.O-a 2fl1cnn IQ P.1111.301.TO RC nen mie taeamerr mart i ACE TRAFFIC .CROWN IV. CCICACT.Al WOOL! ,.w. 1111141.C.IAL COMAS IKSARIPPC PC gym. De1 o...W R1LA 00/0C I lu-w1. C7 7•— 1M.1..))AN=RUC,WYK COMM in 2 DN . MYANpMC1K. MINOR sig M16]W ROM rPw4•1010 - a eel.r..ois PAN O HG SIGN ORO/CT..Cenelaa. v� OW DANCOR RC NI 1-110S-TIO-P111 PAR LOCAL,ORAN I(AIRIAN \r...< -- • \ \ CO G INDEX OR ORAWRJ69 • \ \ \ �� AI. MVO.&CR.Y1.RAN 6 \ ASI 11.0.MAX..Omlll. l' • \ Av 1®llC1ID C.LM PLAN >'-_J 1•04Kt/t6enbre.PATA RMI T \ / \ Y. IDOIOROR R[N11 d)LDM.eCiKN) L g (12 \ C� A«//yy�� \\ / \\\ �� C. MALS 111.AMW rL,W (� • \ l�rlLAloT \ �2 CIS .MT I t'M WNL CPIADINO W OL PLAN/w11.4 MAIL/ Qjt �1 I / / \ .p C.. W.Tt"MO OM CIL,onwle MAX Q' g Z \ LCT I \ 7 LI. LAlD.1JI4 rLAN 7C 1 z~ �: . 04ANLN MON \\ V OC ,,max TO.WI"` RAT.AIIADCIOY)! CC !�-)ye.-�. 1.NO TEM.)•OAn A 1H LATCH m i / IMI mu vent.un au A.D.._� W _—_—_L9dww.,. —Slit_ _. ___ _____ \ —I _ Z memo cowaw ,1•1"i ' \ ltroD! h Vw Qv.ID ; P � ak1ffi111. ��! \ / f�t�a' \ fltaJECT PATA "),V a is TALL .- IL 'Il 0,- ai: DK! � CPt•1lMW SWM 1{LIMIT.p.l1.AL LOCATION .atwew DDirtA ICAO I ON COURT Yllem .1241 0) erect •.__4,,,.. ......1...li N 0.KM..An *n�.all wl L. IiMON ��� ~-• ^ _ V \ •,..• LYNI A.M MD TA%l01 MO.wW,APO S.I.b OMR 14045 �p CNAM L.K r 7 ..! OATCYC .0 M T AIl.A DCIG.II! I��� ALL v.ITL 1LAn Ofa1rMCT O.MI !.) S `IEXI (( RLL LDtlTI Q IH'CE UI [ PCLYIrYT.!' .... IIC1! 0.---- �� CQYl1.ICTXM TOM V-N .,,,,..,h, �1'NI � , 4-1... Yte.St' 1 DRPM AAA. .AI.bR. \IN aIt®1�iQ. I1dLd�A .Irw^w1 ` •qs w. 4aN�4a \ Ot _a \ wTl,w hsv �rt. m 'QQa �/ I MH•\IL�9 ak f MA' �� OR M1LV11"IOIt AY rt.' "1I n I I �b _ \ FAH.AMA bp1 art. .I. L Jr®AMA t11I .2 n. )Y.++ / T.lulw AICA .AA. q rt. �I .4 a _ Sa � 1 rI 1 1 I .wIP...-.CL ARA++a I.. I IPADAro rlwTouu LISII AT 40..0.CC,AK PLANA O8 I"M FLAN ' S.W. BONITA ROAD (COUNTY ROAD # 736) "` LI A1.O • ,.E:001103ALO.l1 5 A Impact Study i • , P - I. • .1 BURTON ENGINEERING & SURVEY CO. 10121 NE GLISAN ST. PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 PH. (503)251-2947 FAX(503)251-3714 February 27,2001 Tri County Industrial Park 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97229 RE: Environmental Impact Assessment Proposed Learning Tree Daycare Center Lot 1,Bonita Industrial Park City of Tigard Washington County, Oregon Introduction Pursuant to City of Tigard Municipal Code, Section 18.350.050 C.1.,Burton Engineering& Survey Co.has completed an Environmental Impact Assessment documenting,visible emissions, vibration, odor glare and heat from uses within on quarter mile of the proposed daycare center. Assessment Procedure Burton Engineering&Survey Co. conducted inspections of the thirty two(32)uses, which consisted of residential, office, sales, warehouse, auto repair shops, and light manufacturing,that were located within one quarter mile of the subject site. Each location is numbered on the enclosed map and a detailed description and impact rating is shown on the enclosed assessment sheets. Findings and Recommendations There were no on-site impacts from visible emissions,vibration, odor, glare and heat generated by any off-site uses within one quarter mile of the proposed daycare center site and thus there are • no on-site impacts to be mitigated. - ®arae Alt.,-a,A ,gyp CX p weft(-.7-173// / • BURT 4' ENGINEERING & SUR`. .Y CO. 1012.1 NE GLISAN ST. "' PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 PH. (503)251-2947 SAN D B U R GFAX(503)251-3714 CNERRYBRLOT 1, BONITA PARK . +�� ' • \PROPOSED DAY CARE CENTER SITE ST , SlAi TECH ER t._., PROPOSED DAY CARE CENTER ,. CENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ~ .D AREA WITHIN %MILE OF SITE 2/5/01 (y U J COL.) /ate G . • .c-'2,\ ®, , . i -T -I Ft\'\ . p\ li 1..i '''' :r- f---._A\/[ R wi,,/\ , ., - ' . - ii --,I‘)„, ..N .1 ., .. ..-.,..'""-').} \A (....) 1 I i ., . _,,,, a UrBONITA ►()CATION ON �' '®8000 -...i MAit\ 0 Q-Ci 4.10.0) C) Lo SW t r ® O Cr sw igf-- ` r� VIOLAn A /". YIl`LA / MI imi ST v) PAIS ,---i _ 0j:::/// ST ��,Y. sw C00 �• � � / `zt . . .. r---i - o CD 1 N DR ,,,,.,.. G "' S W . ," i .5 I 12 .. _ w . SW ��.i. S1 �....., hw. KABLE L E " cit yon, � ct I �hr:....t . c_ h0fll�IYf1/T'(J February 5, 2001 / BURTON ENGINEERING& SURVEY CO. 10121 NE GLISAN ST. PORTLAND,OR 97220 PH. (503)251-2947 PAGE 1 OF 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR FACILITES WITHIN 1/4 MILE OF PROPOSED DAY CARE FACILITY ON LOT 1,BONITA PARK, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON NAME ADDRESS VISIBLE EMISSIONS VIBRATION ODOR GLARE HEAT 1. WEST TECH 14058 SW MILTON COURT NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE 'T ECRONICS SUPPLY 2. ESCHELON NEC 14NONE5NONE SW MILTON COURT NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE AMERICA ELECTRONICS 3. AMERICAN IDENTY 14150 SW MILTON COURT NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE WAREHOUSE—OFFICE 4. CHURCH(OLD) NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE 5. RESIDENTIAL _ NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE SINGLE&MULTI FANILY 6. RESIDENTIAL NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE SINGLE&MULTI FAMILY ? HUNTAIR NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE GHT MANUFACURING AND WAREHOUSE 8. LAKESIDE MOTORS 7390 SW BONITA RD. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE AUTO REPAIR 9. HARRINGTON PLASTICS 7380 SW BONITA RD. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE DISTRIBUTOR&WAREHOUSE 10. NELSON BUSINESS CENTER NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE COMPLEX February 5,2001 BURTON ENGINEERING& SURVEY CO. 10121 NE GLISAN ST. PORTLAND,OR 97220 PH.(503)251-2947 PAGE 2 OF 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR FACILITES WITHIN 1/4 MILE OF PROPOSED DAY CARE FACILITY ON LOT 1,BONITA PARK,CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON NAME ADDRESS VISIBLE EMISSIONS VIBRATION ODOR GLARE HEAT 11. FOUGHT STEEL NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE WAREHOUSE&FABRICATION 12. NORTHWEST STAPLE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE SUPPLIES, SALES,WAREHOUSE. 13. SELECTRON NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE 14. PGE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE TRUCK PARKING, SUPPLIES, OFFICE 15. ROGERS MACHINERY CO. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE EQUIPMENT SALES 16. RYDER TRANSPORTATION 14795 SW 72ND.AVE. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE 17. DELTA FIRE,INC. 14795 SW 72ND. AVE. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE , SALES&WAREHOUSE 18. NORTHWEST ENGINEER 14835 SW 72ND. AVE. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE 19. UNITED PIPE, INC. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE SALES,WAREHOUSE, STORAGE YARD • 20. HADCO SUPPLIES NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE HEATING AND COOLING SALES—WAREHOUSE February 5,2001 BURTON ENGINEERING& SURVEY CO. 10121 NE GLISAN ST. PORTLAND,OR 97220 PAGE 3 OF 4 PH. (503)251-2947 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR FACILITES WITHIN Vs MILE OF PROPOSED DAY CARE FACILITY ON LOT 1,BONITA PARK,CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON NAME ADDRESS VISIBLE EMISSIONS VIBRATION ODOR GLARE HEAT 21. IMAGE MAX 14915 SW 72ND. AVE. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE 22. H&A CONSTRUCTION 14945 SW 72ND. AVE. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE—WAREHOUSE EQUIPMNET PARKING 23. LARGE OFFICE COMPLEX 7N07 SEQUOIA PARKWAY NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE 24. HUNT AIR 14280 SW 72ND. AVE. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE-WAREHOUSE 25. FISKARS-GERBER 142N0 SW 72ND. AVE. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE-WAREHOUSE 26. HUNTAIR NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE-WAREHOUSE 27. MAYFLOWER NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE LARGE COMPLEX TRUCK PARKING&WAREHOUSE 28. SABRE CONSTRUCTION 7235 SW BONITA RD. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE EQUIPMENT PARKING-OFFICE 29. LEIFS AUTO BODY 7325 SW BONITA RD. *NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE OFFICE-BODY SHOP 30. ROSE CITY BLDG. 7220 SW BONITA RD. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE MATERIALS WAREHOUSE-SALES *DOWNDRAFT PAINT BOOTH FILTERED AIR DISCHARGE COMPLIES WITH OAR 340-208-0670 • February 5, 2001 BURTON ENGINEERING& SURVEY CO. 101121 NE GLISAN ST. PORTLAND, OR 97220 PH.(503)251-2947 PAGE 4 OF 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR FACILITES WITHIN 1/4 MILE OF PROPOSED DAY CARE FACILITY ON LOT 1,BONITA PARK,CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON NAME ADDRESS VISIBLE EMISSIONS VIBRATION ODOR GLARE HEAT 31. EMPIRE BATTERIES NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE SALES&INSTALLATION 32. BONITA PIONEER 7333 SW BONITA RD. NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE WAREHOUSE at PROF si z4,�1' #5373 j �� Nis H. 8\19; P;✓e5 2;-/3//`9( r t File Number CleanWater Services SV Our cominitmcnt is clear. Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter Jurisdiction Tigard Date October 15, 2001 Map & Tax Lot 2S112AB 1900, 1901 Owner Tri-County Industrial Park Contact Martin Schott Site Address SW Bonita and Milton Ct Schott and Associates Tigard, OR Address 11977 S. Tolliver Rd Proposed Activity Day School Molalla, OR 970.38 Phone 503-829-6318 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 007). YES I NO 1 YES I NO ;......Natural Resources— .... Alternatives Analysis._..... —......_.._i_.._._....__..__._._._.._....__.....— ._...'..... I I Assessment(NRA) X Required X I Submitted (Section 3.02.5) District Site Visit X Date: Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis • Concur with NRA/or submitted information X Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis I • Sensitive Area Present �/ - Concur with Alternatives �/ On-Site /� ; Analysis i /� Sensitive Area Present X Vegetated Corridor \/ Off-Site I Mitigation Required /� Vegetated Corridor X On-Sitei Present On-Site Mitigation X Width of Vegetated Off-Site Mitigation \/ • • 25 Feet ; X Corridor(feet) (16,000sf) Condition of Vegetated 1Degraded Corridor X ! I Planting Attached ----- -- ---------------....,.._..---.._..__...------ —; 'n Plan Enhancement Required Encroachment into IEquivalent i ; Vegetated Corridor X RSAT,equi or �/ (Section 3.02.4(3)) ' Required /� Type and Square Footage 1 I Concur with RSAT, or of Encroachment 13,875Sf Equivalent I Allowed Use (Section 3:02.4(b)) Conditions Attached X This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 3 - File Number In order to comply with Clean Water Services (the District) water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3 (1), (2), or(3). Applicant intends to apply for fee-in-lieu wetland fill permit for future development(see Attachment 3). 2. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4 (a through h). Applicant shall mitigate for proposed vegetated corridor impacts at an off-site location (see attachments 4-6). 3. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.0.4.a and per approved plans. 4. The applicant shall provide the District with concurrence of wetland boundaries from DSL and/or USACE prior to conducting any land disturbance. (Rec'd 7/31/01; indicated fill has already occurred in Wetland 1, fill shall be addressed in Removal/Fill permit application) 5. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide the District with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. 6. Enhancement/restoration of the off-site vegetated corridor shall be conducted either concurrent with or prior to development of the site. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Appendix E: Landscape Requirements (R&0 007: Appendix E). No enhancement is required for on-site vegetated corridors, enhancement requirement fulfilled through off-site mitigation, due to pending application for wetland fill with fee-in-lieu mitigation. 7. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. 8. Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with the attached planting plan (Attachments 5-6). 9. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 007. 10. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with USA's Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 11. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the District or its designee is required pursuant Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. Page 2 of 3 File Number Nu FVe 12. The applicant shall notify the District within 72 hours following completion of the vegetated corridor enhancement/restoration activities. 13. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with Section 3.13 of R&O 00-7. 14. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the wetland and the vegetated corridor(indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition —see attachment 1). Wetland boundaries shall be marked in the field. 15. Final construction plans shall include off-site landscape/mitigation plans. Plans shall include in the details a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, dates (at least twice yearly) and responsible party contact information. 16. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the District, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. Please call (503) 846-3613 with any questions. ( (i 1/ Heidi K. Berg Site Assessment Coordinator • • Page 3 of 3 / , Wetland 2: 0.02 acres , `. L0,34p �@1 6£Pr�'2 �•it7S7 f:xT1'R3 filf Water Quality \ Sensitive Area R0,1. \ 4 ► \\ Boundaries be abed \ •egraded 4 •ROT, 110: ;LOT6 \ lil vosea, R°,.� 5�$ q Wetland 3: 0.004 acres ' Plo,!(/� PLO Y A • .... V \ 1 Alh,1 / \ ROTii/✓ R°"°0 , 0019Vegetated Corridor Boundaries R0,,,0/ iFl 0,3 \ \ R0,1/i ce \ . Wetland 1: 0.21 acres • Schott&Associates Figure 2: Water Quality Sensitive Areas and 11977 5 Toliver Rd. Vegetated Corridor Conditions Malaita,Oregon 97038 g 503-829-6318 Coy d 4 . ,,1,t-11,r,, t / 7 j../-\ -r)e,/ti-2- ../.4iy aril.. 14”••=iirraZAZI="ra •,,,,..nsr•Iso....1•IMO.90.1 CODE• .-- NYld KW° Orb.Vs•se POSsts.0 "ilirl0Tal IS 0 P ; v aro NNW ...sews.•••••or:... ............,se P4093210 VtiVDLL , 1:1,)1Jvr4 . /00438 AVa 33411.ONNIV71 ine 5 V 910010 t gr,* 0 • J.. • g i . • t 0.41 i :1 1 !I, • ! ; B 1 .:'III ; 0111 i „e g i .thi ; nal 1 1 ... , • . • i . I",1; lig,9 41:101F 1.,s,..101 . . ; fP.Eleareaciceicona--PP.an.,i......4•17r5 :WV.41.6n.A..Y14:14.1.??,?..1.4...11'.c-..,•.........,... ...s..•.; 1 I. I • .1":. 'id el Ma " V e.0_i- 2 II i 1 „,,5 g1-4.....,r44-ermt,n=13:-,4.-izif.mg:', 1 l i• -inic r-41 i t .m . lig . . ..5 ; ; r•I 1;;;; ;; ; P; ; ; ;I;.; I' .,,,,„.....h 1 ) 0., ,, ,, ,,„, ., . ,,, , . ,., ,,,.. .L • . . a.. . .t ...pi.'.. :54:T: :...- ;... z 6 ii NI pig -i_ ; .: .1;il !; .:. • , :.; 1,..•-• ,0 • . ;,-.... ;• ; OPP • 0 se 00 .,sil .......1 ...,.........•••"" s.. . :...'. .. • ....•-•". ....*'*•'. ...•.:::* 1...*:: .1 ..•..."....'•• .• I I .. .......-.... .....••**. . •-... ......***• ..-**-.. t:',%....* .i.s „s!,:!.:.7.2::..::!;:.'.'''.•... . ;:':ii i .••••• ._ .....•-• „.,-*''.:F'27:::?'‘:*..... • • .... !. :t* ..*...; 1. Li.,._ .:ix. .,.:: .:..,,..-4:. .4.......„ I ::• „.•.!.:*. ..'...'''....' 74,. ., ---.':7---1.4,;;. .1 " ..-1.. _....:;5*--.e.C:..; - . 1 :,.. ' ',2... . ;*':". 1' • ........•-• i . • i.••• -•!: . ....- • .: • ...... • •t. ............--••••..--.•• ' .x......„•.: 7....... ....: ....,...J., . .- ..: i . '' .• .• ••• S, I i • Ift....:.: : . • . .— ... .. . . . . . ....—• '" , ' • '.' '..' (,(: tt\ ,• \'''''' .•. ." • , .I.,. I :.. i • ,..2. C.- !I .' .8 .' ••••'.,', \. . ....i..:.: • - . A-:., i.*..,.., I•.:-. I:: ... _ ...... . . . \ —.... .1 ::.: I' - ' - r'''' : 'P '.i ...••••• -2 : .. : • • • '' \''''.....'' '••.. .. .„. .. . •..... ._ :,:i • . .,..1 :.,. . • • .... • .,..... .... .,; . •...• ._ - ,.r ..3 ,:,..-- ..,•‘.., .,,, \ .,, • • • ,...:4 / ,.„... ..,,. ....... _t _ . . 1 : -, . . ... , . _ •-•-• il:;• ••• :.1 ,it , ''' ,,,.:s•.4-1 ., :. •,,,, :•,. - .-.11 I r•il,' ;•!‘• - -,* e':2!•-•,,.,:''. _...,..,„,.. ,.„ ..,,,....,....... .-----'r''' 1,..;',.'• ".....'''''''''''.W'f.,' ,:, i. /. .....:.;'....\,,..,...... '' '...-... :.:'.'.2 • -....:„...----- .'..).,___, ..-.••••••••• • ••• '''• .:-.?, ....-zo,. -,.. . .,....>,...,--- .,......--- 1 ______-•---•—• ) ,, - -.....;...; .,.. .....-,..._ .. , 11/ii/ PI 5 ..,:.,.. — ::., I ihr. .. .••••--/... ' . , ..—..—...--.7 1 i• . ... . •• • __--• •• . _.....- .,..,,..., . ... .......- • 1 I ......-- , . . . . ., .. .- ....,... ...----. ;...:.. 1 1 / .. .....,.!.:;:,.,.1!:!:tr:!1•..:::4'. ,:' !'i , '.','.,; i " '. . :..: ., ....„.,„..,..... . • •.•• . ..•••.. . . ' : ...- :::, '" ; ' "''F'' '..':',:''.i:::',5'..', IS : ,,;•., Ir',,:;, I 1 • . • : . • . : .. .. .. .....,...... .. _a ., • :.........: C/E a5ed!889# XPIFIr !60:0l l0/60/Z0 !qR?LP7.?PnQ T71\17\I'vt-il...1 —I nnun 7 An itic-s • • I 0 • not Ocala \ Q O \ - . PROJECT AM `O I MAI" i. " CaNIi.'aar'fansw . ."C. 11 0. as-+0-11757 Coon at : fol-10-5711 VMS Ism `\ •Or- , ` 1 \ •awromaoo. ns,: . C -ia tlanIC-a•o•rtcnn �/ / \ WV MA awl[ sora, y////%'` ,en}-775n - o.,u Moat,..Cat 1 in;10i .\ a�o[R. Old ra 191•110.1:0•03 eyw„lo..,f.a.rt we In x>-s»-rns 4 Q : • O m. an .n�a n Pasty r. Pan'�t \ , PROJECT DATA • 1.4 I `\ \ • I• .u•nes,••Lai Hila t Art1M•a Man•nal ` 141, � I \ \ • • ia men inn•uil•rns 4 \ ''•••�I i \•110. O .* 1 •Nome N Vaal••MW,CM V•TtA\ 77 1 11 I ,. fit MU men 1sv/. Orl". 0 j • MUMS I wranswO1VR .N,••VC.f. 411.02 SI Mat IS C:::./ - \1 / OQ • Tt I SIKV4R VD•[ia,/•i.L Minarir ...Mate ma 11.0741. ` L 00 t Oa P -- Pr.':.•.••,. -)._.,i._._._. • I 1 . _L�7 .n. 6RAPSIIC 9L:AL! 1, .---3 . r�.,= -- - --. _- ---'- \-Z.s. • • 1 - i . / . il ..-.... ..:-7-::=:-L07-lit-ileLfg-Q_-.--....- 1 • --- ..t.,.M•n 1.OitNTY CO-'!` C 730.• I PE CEIVCC • 1i \ 1 i \ r;.0"1K PRELIMINARY t °O`°" =`•r°um'"a '"'°® BONITA INDUSTRIAL PARK 754 13.10 S.Mat."d• sun tes a"" "" • Um..e , INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Ii.11� SITE PLAN '°„°°°1Q mm ."m»:•naanlfe neem ,Qmi,,.r PREPARED FOR: ��nt7F. TIGARD OREGON Wan..r•'OM � D _ 1 E L E — F G L__ H ' , J 100 ,.ry,,"[,,,?: .1y1t �• St , ,_yam a �I 4B 'K..fD SN $IU(f FR S ' \4 I_rjp..: -SV.._ \� i:' ' . I I - " I5 =i1LR `\��/+grosy fi � - ,. �/. ••C';,,,' `I t Ira,. yatl d y� ' r10a 61ftC ,''I �I 0 r ' I _ r �- .a 9 l (u 4 *.i .jr..: "I Sy v.rtan�° —I 1 r . r rr<lac00 __} � .. _ t - - ilA7 ' _ _ _,3 1 O L / Sf I/.'J - 1 z i ti r' v _ _ -ya is '„t _ �P 1• H , , ,;_l ii--._ ---_.-a E'L•F in•L'-_____ I1• - Dlh <_ ` 4 + 4� •< � 5:. _ i�,e 14 y r.,a. ..• ,� _ - I"''_ m I �� �� z. • _o( -=a:,firt:e ..t. 1. • ,,..54.•.,,, _,•"',I , 1?t•••,c:/:I _ ='`' L�� rl Is• '•1•. I' a'on -; :-�:d SW \��'� `^`. / r I ll Y ,,<tFC�:r '�' Itf1 to $. // t 1. it e= W .✓/ • >� „ •�I 'f •f �. SN LL lur l'I d I' � 8, .lkb _ i :o.Nrar sN" !..rras _w _ SW.��).�.A.�/ , �r> J �,j . lIIALA�It' • I� o. • --.1r r� I t to ro RUQ . , % 1UAL:.1(N Rp, cry t.0 •rr rt �Is�NEc.. - a . �..:. RD _ - = - -�' _ -.7-_ [ I Sw SW MIL4S o` �3 ..lirul Gl I ` ` _ ri ;NI,a.-ua'n` g:' tIES:::8,9 Y CN 7[l /f -e : . I• _ f. }r rtu P !(I6 'VILJ r r, -; _ t 'I k '_; 1 ,I,oW A NYBERG S1I F}W aav .,. I JL'I a,1i ru+ul. .:_ NFFf 1 ) IL.- -Ir ' I _.__ t N ! rnl5 ��. ,..H.-,. rWtr _ A ,"r••--I. 7 lye. .I 4,77 EE / .. ERICA J4 _ _• IIIRICIJN 4rl 11I ).FI ` Jfa�` O\ _ sr ,�/�`' t !° ' _ 5,,;,u - r/ • * e 4 r.1Rk i t DR Sr G @ SN li t_ LrC6ri r.IL _ I • ' r 5 `9 .' •.. ^^' y''. . srewcs$c // ,STONE aa. - : yr,. ! ... I ... t. I '• I IN 1(� _ l !`. '1,1'-"b ET R. _ r - JWmr., :I r- _ / o::: IIC• ` : bwjLAl CCI sr S SAGERI ST SW L 3' i s gt1 �I- 1 ssu.\:-. L • AGERT SE or AW �- • a �� I - SM fiat Si o!'3..,,,,i fiy —_- '-±,,,:-,j.,!4 t� 1! --_--//---9---::.iun'.IL:,; '-'---,!,-,..,-7 \\ no k'1.Sr;I• 4 fl• - // , +\'.itL 1 I t,l .'.. 3 I• IIFI rFa 1S e1'11 ' .^� f! l l Au'"ArfA AT1 __EORTLAND—FRCF Cr I [r.. SN :<ny 51 Ir[� -I /', 3! dl 0 RK i.�-3 AL CRY •$I // _ uj...I,�S+lqe�" i'ii , aau �• e. - :� I , • �-- -t 3 ` ,?g� 33 ! 1 s, Y 9 t t r f r ,/ C / �', g SN PRO<.PFRIY \� Y '� a / R- ._. T..- l'I,n,.N,,opy•• IDR ,,,,L,,,„,_ S,,,.,, _ _P;.It'I +I 2?.! - _ / RG68!IIS t I - ` _, �• v f 142 LI}4 .`* --__-_— . - .. •i. / I tl JFK �� I f .!Lal 5 .1 I (.L r5 ' ti\S / .. fri 16,0 —'— p/ (� ra+ 3 I 6�'„i t/ ''I q a II- I / as<.I I I k i --I I - - r p� l.+ 51 j, II J" / ___r_ ,I `\ c r•.Rrtr .'e _sl -<11 �c—c----- --- Q-\:._..:. /I I,/Ltr C:` CY �Iu�t Jr,ry 7. �, X;/ 'T a,on Jam_ Ti • _ i, - � eat,, fS.• �- - NS Ic:_. I-: SN R RS_E'' MALL 'N DDF!E _ _ �III. ''',-IRI Ll I, rs: ' _ '`'<;'\./..,''----- I: 2i_o= 5 I RD MALL P. Ilr •0. _<o f-r J u ri.L\,:<a NILnEUI RD - -'I J . t' 4".,'-' I Co ... ._ = i I $1og -.I.CRN I i _ 'I - J OG - I L E LC�I'J��I 1N JUDye _ ';'/,:-S\ J�_\ . } N .. • . . ) \ N - t, . 7\ ,------ .------ <_._-•IT, -•., ''' '.,-,4,.. I / -, . _ _ _ . \ I /--- , , - ._ ,_ ..,,,,-' ___-------_____ ,i ----, --//' ., ., .. .... .1.10! -'.. ...., , s .- =1.."4„Atii • i 7.,. ./ , ------ '1:7 7----,:::-:.-- -11-2—___T__:12-4---__--- --- ---- —••-(--9._‘,.._ ,/ (ed..././, ',///. 'I/ _. ---- 4 ___..---- -----•*1 .//7 / ".' /--, S e . i, -*-- ., ,‘/ / • -I ./..c- • Z .. ---__0"."--_____.;----:-.%.• ',.. ----.... . .. --,,S.,.. e,,,...7,./ ;`-.7 --• .*V _ _....- ••• _- • -- , _..--- --CA----...,, ---:...-.----:- -- r -....._ ......._ / An• ,-,p • 1-0 ' ( ( f •1....1/iii,- •.` ,.. ."'fl-- ,s.4.3 \ \ \ \ _ ,‘ ._. .___- .,,_. ‘_. _._•._._ ,,,___ \_i . R.iji a..:. „..;,._7 ! .\ \ • 1_ .4114 eV .. , •:, ••.-2':-.:::j:r--.- -."'-.-.4._‘'.-----/(/,,,>••••••••••••••••0000000----.., r.1\\,.) ,.;;.0e•--'-: _„. \\ Nob ob&* t .•. ., ''..-----..-s'L..,......:,b• ,•.".'.... i(1) ••••••-.'•-.-.(,'L)-T-• \ ';••••-'e . - . - \ TON QUI N ..•••„ .. i • .. - I a ,4,44 •-•-_____ ......!..., _ 11) t•-;-)/(36 • , - /7-<..4 I --- 1 i ,. /• •- ---.? /7 Tp.c:fT.,....-k ,---•::z.------_---- ft. --- ."/ Li ni i ' 1 , N .- .- ; ! i , • ( 1 ' ----:__-- --- ----- / i -, LL:.0 it .41 , \ - ,,.. i .k \ \ ••••0 - \ 1 i ',Z; t,Id\ 1 , i • _\.‘ \ \ 1-' ' ,---- • ' \ ` „ \ \ik. --__ __ I (/\ • • .1 - ... ,.• \ \ I /-- , • .• ' --- \ ' \ \I\ ' i •- \ I /1 '-' • , __i ---' !--..... i N ..,,• ._).\ ii - \f, :3 '101\ D . --...... •, ---1 .-•''''' 1 i - 7,_ . ''\ \ 4 )// \ ) , i , , , ‘, ,. . f/ ,,, , ; , , i• , .r.. ' sii:.__ 1'. ,; 1 i , - • . ' i/A //,) '3 ,, S t I i ( • . . , , \\ t 11 ‘. . • ' , ' \• i 1 ; '. / • ; ;\, - s .....-...,.. dssrai.,,vw-,:,__;,.......,.. _.,..,,Latir.v,,,,,, 03 • , /, ,, , ; , , , .-.,,---4.04,4:0-,•- --04.-r4)..6. 410"igh ei,--... /- ... • ...,..; i, _••,.._ . P.,A..,...4,6-,... r,..4,0.4, .,.__ NW 1_27.1)1 iniava al Up ..,...,.; -- i%\i-\i %.; ..... vgievri4-061i:vo. wiir wrAwyGra0060-045,00,0'‘' 'aw•__-7-=- , ._:...----. .• • ....-- . '\--'-'---.1,•_. le.0-.1S1 .0-eisaw A.---A1' . ‹...._ ( ,--.,. _. •• . - •—•—•----- \ 1, i :..--- .. • \ I •______, / _....-- • ----:--:-- ----- , ' I----- /-1----- i , / • . ; ". •. \ Ei •:•-•, . 0. SCHEMATIC MASTER PI_AN l' , in!iiiitriloilpii?, , 1.0vi,„i4„3f,,D:11,0,:iiii,iohrift,01:w. 1 LANTING PLAN wni: si. o .11,;:., ,., ------''''"''''"''"'i'"""':'1-- LEARNING TREE DA).' SCHOOL .„... ,.. .. ..— „,..... .......... _... ... „,„.......... ..,...... :),?; ::M:,!:'..1 :''',;; VFNii:.4.' TRI-COUNTY 1.N )tISTRIA 1, PA Rh. ....:.: . . .. ....7,.:.. .. .. ....... , . .. .... .,. ..,, .,...... ...... . ... , .... . - , .... . .... ........ ...... Schott & Assoctales. ., 60' 0' 60' 120' 180' ... .. • . .. .... ..,.:. .. ,.., :..• .. ' ' .•;;:...11..'.:',',: .. . . September 7. •:,:,•:. ..]- ,; , -.,. • 2001 1- )t-oi /.1 1520 . . ,.HOTT.& ASSOCIATE 41. 4Ecologists & Wetland Specialists \. 11977 S. Toliver Rd. • Molalla,OR 97038• (503) 829-6318 • FAX (503) 829-3874 S & A #: 1520 September 7, 2001 PLANTING LEGEND Common Name Scientific Name Size Quantity F Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga mensiesii bare root, 24" 4 10-15' o.c. ® Ponderosa Pine Pinus ponderosa bare root, 24" 5 10-15' o.c. OWestern Red Cedar Thuja Plicata cuttings, 5 12-18' o.c. Red Alder Alnus rubra bare root, 36" 15 6-10' o.c. 0 Pacific Willow Salix sp. cuttings, 13 3-5' o.c. Oceanspray Holodiscus discolor 1 gal. 15 9' o.c. OServiceberry Amelanchier alnifolia 36" 27 5' o.c. QTall Oregon Grape Mahonia aquifolium 36" 24 4-6' o.c. Pia"`q- Lf5 t' LEARNING TREE DAY SCHOOL `,-t - (p TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK Schott & Associates, proj. # 1520 September 7, 2001 . • • of �o fOregon Division of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 Salem,OR 97301-1279 John - itraer. ., overnor le s�� AKhhM.DG (503)378-3805 FAX (503)378-4844 http://statelands.dsl.state.or.us July 25, 2001 State Land Board John A. Kitzhaber Jack Steiger Governor Tri-County Industrial Park Bill Bradbury Secretary of State 301 Murray Blvd. Portland, OR 97229 Randall Edwards State Treasurer Re: Wetland Delineation for Learning Tree Day School located in T2S R1 W Section 12, Tax Lot 1900, 2000 in City; WD #2001-0231 Dear Mr. Steiger: I have reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared by Schott and Associates, Inc. for the project referenced above. Based on the information presented in the report and my July 23, 2001 site visit, I concur with the wetland and waterway boundaries as mapped in Figure 3 of the report. These wetlands are subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. A state permit is required for fill or excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in a wetland area or below the top of bank of a waterway. Ground alteration has already occurred within Wetland 1; therefore, this volume should be included in the calculations of wetland impacts for this site. This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law only. Federal or local permit requirements may apply as well. The Army Corps of Engineers will review the report and make a determination of jurisdiction for purposes of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit application is submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to both copies of any subsequent joint permit application to speed application review. In evaluating a permit application, our agency will first consider whether there is an analysis of alternatives that avoid or minimize wetland or waterway impacts. State law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Division staff on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. k:\wetlands\jennifer\wd letters\wd01-02311earningtree.doc This concurrence is based on information provided to the agency. Should additional information be brought to our attention or should site conditions change, we would consider the new information and re-evaluate the site and our jurisdictional determination, as needed. Thank you for your report. The Tigard Local Wetland Inventory should now be revised to document the location of these wetlands. Sincerely, falt Jennifer Goodridge Wetland Specialist cc: Martin Schott, Schott and Associates Duane Roberts, City of Tigard Planning Dept. Rich Gebhart, Corps of Engineers k:\wetlands\jennifer\wd letters\wd01-02311eamingtree.doc .• " O - 6 2 / VA' PLOT14 Wetland 2: 0.02 acres LI:RU(1 WV15.11. 1.1MMI 91.67)12A Wetland Boundaries irtOr> PLOT9A 91.019 Wetland 3: 1.004 acres PLOT5 191090 N PLOT], V \ PLOT‘i P1012 PLOT,0 PLOT9 Kon, .;Komip10,3 PLOTIly Wetland 1: 0.21 acres _ )c1O0 Schott a Associates 11977 S Toliver Rd Figure 3: Wetland Boundaries and Sample Plot Locations molalla,Oregon 97038 503-829-6318 'ac'e 10 (-k. I l52() .111 ENGINEERS January 16, 2000 Daly • Standlee & Associates, Inc. 4900 SW Griffith Drive Suite 216 Beaverton.Oregon 97005 (503)646 4420 Fox (503) 646-3385 Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. 301 N.W. Murray Boulevardl PRO `ff Portland, Oregon 97229 1��ED C7 IN r ,e°, �� Fes\ `L' 11,962 Attn: Mr. Jack Stieger From: Daly-Standlee& Associates, Inc. OREGON , f °Pii) 3,��� GV 1F G. SSP Kerrie G. Standlee, P.E. l XP1RES: (,,/ /U,?. j Re: Bonita Industrial Park Daycare Center Site Noise Assessment DSA File: 194001 Introduction Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc. is proposing to construct a daycare center in Lot 1 of the Bonita Industrial Park located in Tigard, Oregon. The proposed site for the daycare center is located in an industrial zone of the City and according to Section 18.530.050, "Additional Development Standards", of the Tigard Municipal Code, an environmental noise impact assessment must be made for a daycare facility site proposed within an industrial zone of the City. According to City staff reviewing the site application, before the site can be approved, the noise impact assessment must show that noise from industrial sources in the area does not negatively impact the proposed daycare site. At the request of Tri-County Industrial Park, Inc., Daly-Standlee& Associates, Inc. conducted sound measurements at the proposed daycare center site to determine if the amount of industrially generated noise reaching that location would be considered acceptable for a daycare facility. This report presents the results of the measurements and the conclusions drawn from those results. Measurement Procedures Sound measurements were made at the site on January 5, 2001 for one hour between 10:12 a.m. and 11 :12 a.m. It was known prior to the measurements that the environmental noise at the site was a result of noise from industrial sources in the area and the result of noise from traffic on Bonita and other roads in the area. The measurement time was selected because the noise assessment was supposed to only include industrial noise and because traffic noise was expected to be lowest at the site during the mid morning hours. 194001-1.rep A' January 16, 2001 Tri-County Industrial Park Daycare Center Site Noise Assessment The sound measurements were made with a Larson Davis Model 700 Sound Level Meter. The Larson Davis meter is a Type 2 meter which has the ability to continuously monitor the sound at a location and determine and store specific data about the sound for later review. The meter was programmed to monitor the sound at a rate of 32 times per second and then determine and store the maximum level present during the one hour measurement, the minimum level present during the one hour measurement and the hourly L01, L10, L50 and L90 sound levels (the sound levels exceeded 1% of the hour(36 seconds), 10%of the hour(6 minutes), 50% of the hour (30 minutes) and 90% of the hour (54 minutes) respectively). The meter was field calibrated before and after the measurement with a Larson Davis Model CA250 Calibrator to insure the data was as accurate as possible. Observations were made during the one hour measurement to help identify how much of the measured sound was a result of industrial noise and how much was a result of other noise sources. Notes were made about the different noise sources that influenced the measured noise levels during the measurement period. Measurement Results and Discussion of Results The following noise level data was obtained from a one hour measurement at the daycare center site: Table 1 Results of One Hour Measurement Made on January 5, 2001 at Proposed Bonita Industrial Park Daycare Center Site L,,,,x Hourly L01 Hourly L,,, Hourly L5„ Hourly L<,,, 52 dBA 72 dBA 65 dBA 59 dBA 57 dBA 55 dBA To help understand the meaning of the data, 10 percent of the hour (6 minutes) the noise level at the site was below 55 dBA but at no time did it ever drop below 52 dBA; 40 percent of the hour (24 minutes)the noise level was between 55 dBA and 57 dBA; 40 percent of the hour (24 minutes) the noise level was between 57 dBA and 59 dBA; and only 10% of the hour (6 minutes of the hour) the noise level was above 59 dBA. Of the 6 minutes of total time in the hour when the noise level was above 59 dBA, the level was between 59 dBA and 65 dBA for a total of 5.4 minutes and it was between 65 dBA and 72 dBA for only 36 seconds. Even though the measurement period was selected in an effort to minimize the influence of traffic noise on the measured level, traffic was the main source of the noise at the site during the measurement period. In general, traffic on SW Bonita Road, SW 72 Street and even I-5 caused the noise level during the measurement site to be around 56 dBA. Noise from industrial sources during the measurement period was generally below the minimum 52 dBA level and did not contribute much to the overall noise level during a majority of the time. However, at times, industrial noise from the Fought & Company shop influenced the measured noise level at the daycare center site. 194001-I.rep 2 January 16, 2001 Tri-County Industrial Park Daycare Center Site Noise Assessment During the measurement period, an overhead crane at the Fought & Company shop was being used to lift steel material and move it around the outside yard. When the crane was in the western end of the yard, noise from an electric winch could be heard at times when traffic noise was lower. The noise from the electric winch on the crane was determined to be around 54 dBA when during one instance, the noise level at the daycare center site dropped from level of 57 dBA to a level of 54 dBA after the winch was turned off in the west end of the yard. A reduction of 3 dB in the overall noise level when the winch was turned off can only occur when the contribution from the winch was equal to the contribution from the noise left without the winch; 54 dBA. Therefore, when the crane was in the west end of the yard, and when the winch was in use, the over all noise level at the daycare center site was influenced a little by the electric winch but the contribution ranged between 1 and 3 dB, depending on the amount of noise from traffic at the time. Because the crane was working in the west end of Fought's yard for approximately 10 minutes total time during the one hour period, there was very little contribution by the winch to the overall noise at the daycare center. In addition to the crane winch noise from the Fought & Company facility, air was released from pneumatic valves located on the south side of the shop and the release of air was audible. The noise caused by air release from pneumatic valves at the Fought Company was noted to range between 60 dBA and 68 dBA when it occurred. However, the air release noise was present for such short period of time when it occurred that it alone could not have been the cause of the measured hourly L„) noise level of 59 dBA. The hourly L„) noise level was mainly a result of noise generated by trucks on Bonita Road, commercial jet aircraft and two military aircraft flying over the site. When the crane was in use in the east end of the yard, when the crane was in the west end of the yard without the use of the electric winch, and when the crane was not in use at all, the noise at the daycare center was totally a result of traffic noise and any noise from other sources such as commercial jet aircraft flying overhead. Other than noise from the Fought & Company shop, noise from other industrial operations in the area was not even audible during the measurement. If no outdoor activities had been occurring at the Fought & Company site during the measurement period, we believe the noise levels measured at the daycare center site would have been the same as those presented in Table 1. That is because it appeared that the noise radiating to the site from the industrial sources was generally less than that reaching the site from roadway traffic. Assessment of the Industrial Noise Found at Proposed Daycare Center Site The amount of noise at the proposed daycare center site caused by industrial sources is much less than that allowed by the Oregon DEQ noise regulation at a noise sensitive receiver (hourly L,„ of 75 dBA, L„)of 60 dBA and L5,) of 55 dBA) and much less than that allowed at a noise sensitive land use by section 7.40.170 of the Tigard Municipal Code (maximum level of 75 dBA). A noise sensitive receiver is defined in the DEQ noise regulation as property where sleeping normally occurs or as property used as a church, school, library or hospital. The Tigard Code defines noise sensitive land use as any portion of a church, children's daycare, hospital, residential group care, school, single or multifamily dwelling unit and mobile home that is intended for living, sleeping or eating. Since the amount of industrial noise reaching the proposed daycare center site is below both state and city noise codes, it is concluded that the amount of industrially generated noise reaching the daycare center site would be considered acceptable under the City of Tigard Development Code. 194001-I.rep 3 • CITY OF TI4 • PRE-APPLICATION CONF (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Val NON-RESIDENTIA WADDLE DESIGN PLANNING ARCHITECTURE PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: !/— `7"L� k,.uti !. n, . STAFF AT PRE-APP.: J 7.eA APPLICANT: AGENT: :)-71 u1/q c/ire Phone: ( - ) Phone: ( ) 22-/ 2oe0 3 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: . TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): Z57 /2 f O/5700 0/c o% NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: S/- Develop-e,11-, 't- ,� 'k/, �� ,7 cs e %/yds- r,v,[l✓ i �v_ /") /or /(6;le c G?�j�Sf1itG 9�" (f ci f7or4i A �� 1' r /,14/ % PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: a^S->trE.�l y 6-5 1'0 Sy, city c4r— •' l COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 7/44 1'77d ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: L C.I.T. AREA: 45/- FACILITATOR PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: ,. - sq. ft. Average lot width: So ft. Maximum building height: ft. Setbacks: Front J ft. Side ?Cft. Rear c) ft. Corner - ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: FS % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /•`> %. (Refer to Code Section 18.$ 3o. 7-1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 9 X011-Aaldtmiil Appi uiion/Phnnmt Dnnion S twn SPECIAL SETBACKS • STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half ('/2) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ PARKING AND - E0 $ -ED parking for this type of use: 51e966s Agfe - 41%7 3,219ez wCa Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 's Sq-aye_ "Qe-,< ~1\ SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 Handicapped Parking: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: J Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: a y All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Chapters 18.165 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NDN-Ce idem]Appliauon/Plnnine D,,is on Section AMWAY REQUIREM TS AYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030] LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. space_siz-e—gid location shall be as--915-proved bythe City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.080] CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.795] BUFF NGAND SCREE NB' '"/4 l 4 . /1°F�a j'9��� ' r'4 's In NCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745] The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: NDSCAPIN REET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.105] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Appi twn/PI nning Division Seaton • SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SENSITIVELANDS6.e(A`� " , oo4((a'n -Gude provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25-P RCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVE)t; the responsibility\to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submittedivjth the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulationsLfor the use, pr6 ection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS-PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7751 STEEP SLOPES ___Whet-ST€EELOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order,-a-geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of tTtgard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be ba zt poiF geld exploration and investigati n and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 z"-"sl-°.4-42';) (64 i n4&--t- A4'd T /c LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of th7effsitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has een granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is anted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the o ace water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minirr�tlm of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowe in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the deyelopment or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, N, 'f EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed"as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and Y WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of tye Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corr or: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON Aesden oil Appliahon/Planning Denim Section WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and co ervation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Titard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of operty while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands an streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: / The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetla4ls and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: / Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" ' the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet p r second (cfs). D. Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREE , ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of t e Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALL FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the s e as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). Y The standard TUALATIN RIV RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. / D. The MAJOR STREAMS RIP RIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.791.030) Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY/APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STR M RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or imperplilous surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of/riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: D Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; D The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; D That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-ResdennA Appluuion/Plmnin`Diruion Section ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.100) 4EE REMOVAL PLAN REQUI EMEN A-TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ ITIGAn011; PLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E1 PITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NDN-Resdentiil OppLa6on/Plmn n Dnision Section The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.390] CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) / - 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directuis Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) _ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Gradation) - 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) fr 18.310(Variances/Adjustments)i 4?-0,; .-` 18.115(Density computations) __- 18.790(Tree Removal) .(fc�sL,a 18.380(boning Map/Text Amendments) P4'1`''N 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permit) 18.430(Subdivisions) f 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) �I8.155 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial boning Districts) -__ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) PACT STUD part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 (THrlii-IBORHOOD MEETING HE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with--thq City of Tigard, applicants are required tQcomplete and-file a subdivision plat namin_g request with the- ashington County Surveyor's. Office in order to obtaig approval/reservation for any subdivision--name. Applications ' not be accepted as complete ntil the City receives the faxed confirmation of approv m the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884] CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Andcntiil Apphotion/Phnning Dnision Section BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). *MING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.155) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS/ OR COMMENTS: / �`` / �J /� ofr1q/n �r�/rte �r 1 c/(/'/�f �iio✓i .c(i m,f-c/ o A/4 S7ck "P Ory -, 4,7,/ ave ribr r4-01' 9i h avc /1,1-7 r'et4.€ . (41, T V/lon,rtc-rf(4l s S,- 4 // 7c PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. QTY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Aesdenwl App6ation/Phoning Dnulon Seam The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard /44 r-/'9$ OFR . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. 'PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: JD/<j 4- ',/,4 CITY OF TIGARD PI7lNNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-1297 E MAIL (staff;first name)@ci.tigard.or.us H:Ipatty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc (Engineering section:preapp.eng) Updated: 28-Feb-2000 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Apptiution/Planint Num Semon • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan - Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Iig— Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan 8-- Site Development Plan ID-- Architectural Drawings ▪ Landscape Plan 0 Sign Drawings Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /cP COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis tr--- Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map l ` 60Xes i �Q /%'G✓/�'1/e J S S-an„gi Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditio71,p1 Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area _ ❑ • Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ • Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ • Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ • Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor a e designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining par s of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10°/0-grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within a adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements �/ ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ! ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines X0;000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, oper),.spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with p46meter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structi and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after pl- ing ❑ Supplemental inform. in including: • Proposed de-. restrictions (if any) ❑ • A propos-.'plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing n- ral features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The pr..osed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purp.ses other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If _ y of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ ?-retiminary Partition/Lot Line Adjust --- ------------------------ The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ Themap scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines _ ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • • ite Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ candscape P Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials _ ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ TPubl_ is Improvements/Streets PI Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 radingl�rosion Control P� The locations and extent to which grading will take place Existing and proposed contour lines Slope ratios Utilities Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants urinary Stmt-n Drainage P The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways LI Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines 111 Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility eVee_PLeservaiiiiniMitigation Plat Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction -Architectural Drawings gs ,, Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use LJ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height (i is\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 t 48', c'$`. K �' x � d, * rt:Ai, it � , '.,• s `. " 4_ : ,� �mss. v°.,...a k , 5 Y 'a',A,S4• sJ b PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCEH_ OTES4 „4: ,+ a *`Ya�'� - a + x � ,x �i `y, �' III5 `•`r,. z J,Atif ENGINEERING FSECTION 4 �£C�141ofTlgardgreg0o ° ,2 %� G a 3 r Shapi rig 4A Butte 4.® .s x^ 4 x r � ,� �E t .., � a• <- �<„-: u.. ...:v. �� � �� � ,:,� �e� � ���Community,=;> PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maids): 2S112AB Tax Latish 1900&1901 Use Type: Day Care Facility The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:. ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW Bonita Road, to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ® street trees planted behind the sidewalk, spaced per TDC standards. ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD.Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section • w . ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement (l concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk f l street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section Agreement for Future Street 'rovements: . IfTsome cases, where street ,.,oprovements or other necessary put,— improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In.such cases, a condition' of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) • Overhead Utility Lines: ❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located adjacent to SW Milton Court. Also, there is an 8-inch main line in SW Bonita Road with a 4-inch service lateral that likely serves the existing house. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to connect the new building to the public sewer. The existing 4-inch lateral from SW Bonita Road may be suitable to serve the new building. Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503).639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section drainage plan for the site, a may be required to prepare a sub in drainage analysis to ensure • tITat the proposed system will u,;commodate runoff from upstream p,.,perties when fully developed. Onsite detention is required. Submit preliminary sizing calculations of the proposed detention facility with the site development review plans. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All• proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. The City will require the applicant to provide a joint ingress/egress easement to the Bonita Community Church parcel (2S1 12AB, TL 1600) for the proposed driveway on SW Milton Court. The easement must be configured so that any future redevelopment of the church site can gain access to SW Milton Court via the day care driveway. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes • Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section • Pay TIF. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. • Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section • cases where the lc 94 are working on has slopes excess of 20% and foundation • excavation material is .Jt to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. • Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: 1! I ( co E GINEERING DE''I RTMENT AFF Phone: 15031639-4171 Fax: 15031684-7297 is\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng.dot.doc Revised: April 21,2000 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section N_Gc9-c-ooa _ Nov, c- tk- CITY OF TIGARD 4 .00 LAND USE APPLICATIONS p TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE CHECKLIST Shaping/4(Be�Community PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BROM 8E:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY PERSON THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER 1. All of the items identified within this check list are required to be submitted and received by the Planning Division alfmum date/timee to af one 1)11oweek Staffrior to ample time Ito cially scheduling a pre-application conference prepare for the meeting. A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11 :00 AM. initia 2. The application process for requesting rdaaP - ll (sulbm t 2on ference copies iseach)eacth), by the applicant in the form of a le plan containing the following pertinent information: v� Name, address and telephone number of the applicant and agent if applicable. y A brief description have Staff research h pr or to thesmeetinecific questions/issues that you would like ►�, 'Site plan showing the proposed lots and/or building layouts, drawn to scale. Show the location of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property„ and across the street (this is beneficial in providing a more accurate assessment of possible issues concerning development). 'The proposed uses. ►�, Tax maps and lot numbers for all subject properties. iv Current owners of the subject property, if other than the applicant. . Topographic information (include contour lines if possible). ,y If the pre-application conference is for a MONOPOLE project, the applicant must attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation Protocol was completed (see Section 18.798.080). t $240 pre-application conference fee. IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE PRE-APPLICATION CE PLEASE ONFERENCE IN YOUR gRRANGEMENTSINFORM CAN BE MADE CITY IN AP O THAT ALTERNATE ROOM i:\curpinlmasters\revisedlPre-app Chdcklist.doc Revised: 11-May-2000 Pre-Apps (CD-Meetings) - November 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Thursday, November 09, 2000 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app Pre-app Jim Waddel So3 -22j-aoo3:;� 9:30 10:00 Pre-App 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 8:39AM Friday,October 27,2000 Receipt #: 27200000000000001057 h—'" --"� Date: 10/26/2000 TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due PRE2000-00005 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 $240.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL 0 2977 $240.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $240.00 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC N' -2977,',' • • . -- , US BANK ._ a . t - • `; 2106. SE OCHOCO.STREET MAIN OFFICE MILWAUKIE,OR' 7222 PORTLAND,OR 97206,-:' ; . - PHONE(503):654-1136' • x24-22/10 o *** TWO .HUNDRED FORTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS ,, TO THE • ORDER OF 10/23/00 $240 . 00***** City of Tigard w 13125 SW Hall Blvd . 2 Tigard, OR 97223 8 . I City of Tigard Re: Day School Project at SW Bonita Road and SW Milton Drive Pre Application Project Description: This project includes the site and building development for a 6,480 sq. ft. day school, fenced play areas and parking lot. Pre Application Questions to be Answered: Can the entries to the project be located as shown on the proposed site plan. Will fire department access be required onto the site itself, given the building location? Are any additional fire hydrants required? c.2: Which street determines the front yard, SW Bonita Road o SW Milton Dr_tyd What is side yard requirement at other street? Can parking extend into either yard? What is maximum and minimum parking permitted on this site for this use? _4:— Can the play area for the day school extend into the yard along SW Bonita Rd? Up to the slope easement?? yes R „,:(,,,s 4.5 5/11v ,.c c.g) s: Are there any traffic impact fees or other surcharges for the development of the site? 161 What other fees are required and how much are they? 7. Will a submittal to The City Building Department for site plan review and permit be automatically routed to all agencies requiring review and approval of the proposed work, i.e. Fire Marshall, Sewer and Water districts, etc.? 8. Explain the complete process of submittals and approvals, how long each stage is likely to take, and how they relate to one another. / Ai"L" For purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment, what are acceptable e is of noise, si le emissions, vibration, odor, glare and heat? DEQ /8 7zs L1-0(- What are the qualifications necessary for the person conducting the assessment? 11. 12. OCT.20.2000 4:22PM TR t COUNTY IND. PK. NO.508 P.1/1 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK,INC. 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND, OREGON 97229 503-643-5757(direct line) 503-643-5756(voice mail) FAX 503-626-0621 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION October 17, 2000 TRANSMITTING TO FAX NUMBER: 503-221-1709 NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: NONE TO: Jim Waddle Waddle Design 1927 NW Kearney St. Portland, OR 97209 FROM: Jack Steiger Hi Jim: The owner of the property is: Tri-County Industrial Park,Inc. 301 NW Murray Blvd/ Portland, OR 97229 503-643-5756 The tax map numbers are 2S 112AB 01900,and 2S 112AB 01901 My questions, in addition to the set back on Bonita Rd., are as follows: 1. For purposes of the Environmental Impact Assessment, what are acceptable levels of noise, visible emissions,vibration, odor,glare and heat? 2. What are the qualifications necessary for the person conducting the assessment? If you need anything else,let me know. Thank you. Tri-County Industrial Park,Inc. Jac Steiger Property Administrator This message is intended only for the use of the Individual or entity to which It Is addressed and may contain information that Is privileged,confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,or copying of this communication Is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication In error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 11/01/2001 14: 08 5038293874 SCHOTT AND ASSOC PAGE 01 • ■' '■ SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES 4. Ecologists & Wetlands Specialists •_11` • \ 11977 S.Toliver Rd. • Molalla,OR 99038 • (503) 829-6318 e FAX: (503) 829-3874 LEARNING TREE OFF-SITE MITIGATION AREA MAINTAINANCE AND PLANTING PLAN Planting Plan: The location and plant size and type are shown on the mitigation plan. A two foot diameter circle will be scalped for each plant location. The plant will be installed in the middle of the scalped area. A 2 inch thick layer of bark mulch will be spread over the scalped area. A 2"X2" stake will be installed at each woody plant location The stake is intended to help located planted woody species, and to protect the plants from mechanical damage, which can occur during maintenance. Maintenance Plan Irrigation: Irrigation will only be used if the summer after the implementation of the mitigation proves to be hotter and drier than average. Tri-County Industrial Park has water rights from Tonquin Lake. xotic Species Control: Currently,the proposed mitigation site has been kept mowed, and there are very few undesirable exotic species on-site. Only two exotic species have significant potential to become problems on the site;Himalayan blackberry and Scots broom. Neither of these species are currently a problem. The site will be inspected by the existing grounds crew for the presence of these species. Jack Steiger will be responsible for insuring these inspections occur. If these species are found they will be grubbed out at the time of the inspection. The inspection will occur in mid-May and again in mid-August. .417 ..s,Sit.0).048.0CS) 11/bl/2bbl 15: 4.1 5b3:12'JdUf4 SC;HUI I AND A55UC; rant b1 SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES Ecologists & Wetlands Specialists 11977 S. Toliver Rd. • Molalla, OR 97038 • (503) 829-6318 • FAX: (503)829-3874 WETLAND SPECIFICATIONS PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION: Furnish all materials, equipment, and labor necessary for the completion of planting as indicated on drawings and specified hereinafter. Work includes, but is not limited to site preparation, planting and seeding, fertilizing, mulching, maintenance and guarantee of planted areas. 1.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE/GUARANTEE: All plant material and planting locations are to be approved by a wetland biologist or mitigation specialist from Scjott & Associates(herinafter referred to as Schott) prior to planting. During planting, Schott is to be on-site. Plant substitution may be permitted based on plant availablity, but only with the approval of Schott and the permitting agency. The seed mix specified in the plant schedule is to be adhered to and used for all areas designated_ All plant material is to be guaranteed for a full year from the date of planting. Any planted material (woody, herbaceous, or seeded)which proves to be other then specified or is not in vigorous condition within a period of one year from acceptance of the work will be replaced by the Contractor without cost to the Owner. An 80% minimum survival rate is expected after three years. Furnish certificate of compliance with indicated seed mixture and any certificates of inspection and compliance as required by Federal and State laws and regulation for plant and soil additives. 1.03 SITE CONDITIONS/DAMAGE/CLEANUP: A filter funic fence is also to be placed between the existing wetland the utility construction easements (restored wetland area). The fence will remain in place until planted vegetation is established as determined by Schott and/or the permitting agency. Locate all underground utilities prior to digging or driving stakes. Any existing buildings, equipment, underground utilities, walks, roads, and/or forms damaged by the Contractor are to be replaced and/or repaired at the Contractor's expense, in a manner satisfactory to the Owner's Representative before final payment is made. The Contractor is to be responsible for keeping planted areas free of debris, rock, and sand throughout the course of the work. Upon completion of the contract, the Contractor's to remove all surplus material, equipment, and debris from the site. All planted areas are to be rake-clean. 11/ U1! LUU1 1J. 4J JUJOL730f4 I I HIVU 1.04 MAINTENANCE: Manintenance is to include regular visits at least monthly to the project site for the purpose of weeding, supplemental watering, and other items necessary to maintain planted areas in a healthy condition. Weeding is to consist only of cleared and mulched areas maintained around each woody plant, and removal of exotic species such as blackberries, Scot's Broom, or others as determined from the resorted or created wetland areas_ No spraying of herbicides or other chemicals, or application of fertilizer(other than noted on the plan), is to occur within the mitigation wetland areas. No pruning is to occur unless authorized by Schott and/or the permitting agency. The maintenance period shall be for two years following the completion date of planting as determined by Schott and/or the permitting agency. 1.05 SCHEDULE: Any earthwork must be approved by the project representative prior to commencement of such work. At that time, it will be determined what extra measures, if any, should be taken to prevent damage due to earthwork in saturated soils. Planting is to occur during the cool season months (November to March) to take advantage of seasonal rains and the greater availability of plant material. Other planting time, if authorized, may require plant substitutions and supplemental irrigation. 1,06 EXISTING VEGETATION: Protect all existing vegetation designated to remain. Any existing vegetation damaged by Contractor will be replaced with plants of equal or better size and condition at contractor's expense. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 PLANT MATERIALS: Plant materials are to conform to Standards and Regulations as specified. Rooted plants are to be first quality, well-foliated, with well-developed root systems, and normal well-shaped trunks, limbs, stems, and heads. Schott will approve for quality conformance_ All rooted plant material is to be labeled by genus, species and variety. Plants deemed unsuitable may be rejected before or after delivery. All plant material is to be free from damage, disease, insects, insect eggs and larvae. 2,02 WILLOW CUTTINGS' Willow cuttings are to be only native species (i.e. Salix fluvictillis or S. lasiandra) and not weeping willow, corkscrew willow or other horticultural species or cultivars. 2.02 SOIL AMENDMENTS: Soil amendment is to consist of screened mill-run fir and/or hemlock sawdust blended with composted manure or air digested sewage sludge. The blended ingredients are to be composted to a minimum of one year. Bassett Western Fertil -Mulch or approved equal, Mulch is to consist of shredded wood and/or bark. Fertilizer for tree and shrub plantings is to be in 21 - gram tablet form and contain 20% nitrogen, 10% phosphoric acid and 5% potash. 11/ G1/ LGG1 13: 4,3 Ot7-ib.eidd/4 5C.;HUI I (NU 4455UL Wa(±. b4 2.04 SEEDING MATERIALS: If hydroseeding, use seedmix as indicated in specifications, wood cellulose fiber from Douglas Fir or Western hemlock dyed to facilitate placement, and non- toxic, biodegradable J-TAC or approved equal. If broadcast seeding, use seed mix as directed. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION FOR PLANTING: Remove topsoil to 8-inch depth from upland and wetland areas to be disturbed by wetland mitigation. Stockpile the topsoil, which does not have reed canary grass, and remove the reed canary grass contaminated topsoil from the wetland area. 3.02 EARTHWORK: Perform earthwork as necessary to achieve elevations as described, with sufficient excavation to allow placement of 8 inches of stockpiles topsoil. Topsoil from the adjacent uplands will be needed to meet the 8 inches. Following major earthwork, confirm with Schott the subgrades are approved before redistributing stockpiled soils over the restored wetland area. Rototill or use other approved means, thorougly blending topsoil and subsoil to reduce interface, to a minimum depth of six inches into subgrade. Compact soils to 75-85% density. Remove all surface rocks over 6 inches in any dimension. Grades must be even and smooth, and relate to adjacent surfaces as indicated. 3.03 PLANT INSTALLATION: Plant per specified scheduling and after all major construction is complete. Oreint plants as directed for best appearance. Plant as shown on detail drawings. 3.04 WILLOW INSTALLATION: Rooted willow cuttings will be used if available. However, if rooted material is not available, unrooted cuttings of willow are to be placed in damp to wet soil in the early spring while the plants are still dormant (leafless). The end of the cutting placed in the soil (the lowest portion of the cutting as it grew on the parent tree or shrub) is to be dipped into a rooting hormone (i.e. "Rootone" TM) prior to placement into the soil. For each designated willow location on the planting plan, three rooted plant or five unrooted cuttings will be planted in a clumped group. The rooted willows will be spaced of three foot centers, and the unrooted cutting will be spaced at 18 - inch centers. 3.05 SEEDING: For hydroseeding of the wetland mitigation areas, use 100 pounds of the upland seed mix per acre. 3,05 IRRIGATION: The woody plants within the mitigation area shall be irrigated for the first growing season following planting. The irrigation can be by hand, drip or sprinklers. 3.06 FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND INSPECTION: Following completion of all the above items and with Schott's approval, a pre-warranty acceptance of the project will be granted. From this date forward, for a period of one year, the landscape planting warranty will be in effect. 11/ I/ 1 lb: 4J 5bJblyJ8(4 5UHUI I ANL) A5U(. All maintenance as indicated of seeded and planted areas during the guarantee period will be by the contractor and will include items as indicated to fully establish all seeded and planted areas to a healthy vigorous state.