The URL can be used to link to this page

Metro ~ IG166001 ~ Dirksen Nature Park Natural Areas Bond Grant CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 Project: Natural Areas Capital Grants Program Contract No. 932931 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Natural Areas Bond Measure Capital Grant Award This Intergovernmental Agreement (this "Agreement"), entered into under the provisions of ORS chapter 190 and effective on the date the Agreement is fully executed (the "Effective Date"), is by and between Metro, a metropolitan service district organized under the laws of the state of Oregon and the Metro Charter, located at 600 N.E. Grand Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232-2736, and the City of Tigard, located at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97233 ("Grant Recipient"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the electors of Metro approved Ballot Measure 26-80 on November 7, 2006, authorizing Metro to issue $227.4 million in bonds to preserve natural areas, clean water, and protect fish and wildlife (the "Measure"); WHEREAS, the Measure allocated $15 million from bond proceeds to the Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program to complement the regional and local share portions of the Measure by providing opportunities for the community to actively protect fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in areas where people live and work; WHEREAS, Metro has determined to make a grant award to Grant Recipient to fund Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems (the "Project") as more specifically identified within the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Work"); WHEREAS, this Agreement between Metro and Grant Recipient is now needed to satisfy the terms and conditions of the Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program as provided for in the Measure; and WHEREAS, except as specifically provided in this Agreement, including the scope of work attached hereto as Exhibit A, and otherwise notwithstanding any statements or inferences Page 1 — Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 to the contrary, Metro neither intends nor accepts any(1) direct involvement in the Project (2) sponsorship benefits or supervisory responsibility with respect to the Project; or (3) ownership or responsibility for care and custody of the tangible products which result from the Project; NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purpose; Scope of Work; Limitations The purpose of this Agreement is to implement the Measure and facilitate the funding of a Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program project. Grant Recipient shall perform all activities described in the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Work"). As a condition precedent to Metro's agreement to fund the Project, Grant Recipient hereby approves the Project and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable provisions of the Measure. At no time will Metro have any supervisory responsibility regarding any aspect of the Work. Any indirect or direct involvement by Metro in the Work shall not be construed or interpreted by Grant Recipient as Metro's assumption of a supervisory role. 2. Declaration of Capital Project In accordance with the Measure, Metro may only provide funds to Grant Recipient for the Project so long as such funds are exclusively used for capital expenses. Grant Recipient hereby confirms that the Project will result in the creation of a capital asset to be owned by Grant Recipient. The monetary value of the Project that is recorded as a capital asset shall be no less than the amount of the grant award that is actually provided to the Grant Recipient. Until June 30, 2027 or the date upon which all Bond debt related to Project is retired, whichever occurs earlier, Grant Recipient covenants that it will (a) own and hold all such capital improvements and real property interests acquired pursuant to this Agreement, and (b) record the asset created by the Project as a fixed, capital asset in Grant Recipient's audited financial statement, consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") and with Grant Recipient's financial bookkeeping of other similar assets. Page 2— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 3. Contract Sum and Terms of Payment Metro shall compensate Grant Recipient for performance of the Work as described in Exhibit A. Metro shall not be responsible for payment of any materials, expenses or costs other than those that are specifically described in Exhibit A. 4. Limitations on Use of the Capital Asset That Results from the Project Throughout the term of this Agreement, Grant Recipient shall maintain and operate the capital asset that results from the Project in a manner consistent with one or more of the following intended and stated purposes of the Measure (the "Nature in Neighborhood Approved Purposes"): • To safeguard water quality in local rivers and streams; • To protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; • To promote partnerships that protect and enhance nature in neighborhoods; and • To increase the presence of ecological systems and plant and animal communities in nature deficient and other disadvantaged neighborhoods; Grant Recipient may not sell, use, or authorize others to use such capital asset in a manner inconsistent with such purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, secondary uses that arise as a result of such capital asset being used primarily in accordance with the Nature in Neighborhood Approved Purposes will be permitted, but only to the extent such secondary uses affect a de minimis portion of such capital asset or are necessary in order to facilitate the primary Nature in Neighborhood Approved Purposes. For example, if, as part of a land use review proceeding initiated to obtain the necessary approvals to operate such capital asset consistent with the Nature in Neighborhood Approved Purposes, a portion of such capital asset was required to be dedicated as a road, such road dedication would be a permitted secondary use. If the Work is the acquisition of real property, then Grant Recipient shall satisfy the requirements in this section of the Agreement by granting to Metro a conservation easement Page 3 — Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 substantially comparable to the form of conservation easement approved by the Metro Council at the time the Metro Council approved the grant award to Grant Recipient. 5. Funding Recognition Grant Recipient shall recognize in any publications, media presentations, or other presentations referencing the Project produced by or at the direction of Grant Recipient, including, without limitation, any on-site signage, that funding for the Project came from the Metro Natural Areas Bond Measure's Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program. Such recognition shall comply with the recognition guidelines detailed in the Measure. The Grant Recipient shall place at or near the Project's location signage that communicates that funding for the Project came from the Metro Natural Areas Bond Measure's Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program. 6. Term It is the intent of the parties for the Project to have been completed, and for all Metro funding to have been provided to Grant Recipient prior to September 30, 2018. Notwithstanding the forgoing, all provisions set forth in this Agreement, and the obligations of Grant Recipient hereunder, shall continue in effect after the completion of the Project until June 30, 2027. 7. Termination for Cause A. Subject to the notice provisions set forth in Section 7.13 below, Metro may terminate this Agreement, in full or in part, at any time during the term of the Agreement if Metro reasonably determines that Grant Recipient has failed to comply with any provision of this Agreement and is therefore in default. B. Prior to terminating this Agreement in accordance with Section 7.A above, Metro shall provide Grant Recipient with written notice that describes the reason(s) that Metro has concluded that Grant Recipient is in default and includes a description of the steps that Grant Recipient shall take to cure the default. From the date that such notice of default is received by Grant Recipient, Grant Recipient shall have 30 days to cure the default. If the Page 4— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 default is of such a nature that it cannot reasonably be cured within 30 days, Grant Recipient shall have such additional time as required to cure the default, as long as it is acting in a reasonable manner and in good faith to cure the default. In the event Grant Recipient does not cure the default within the 30-day period, Metro may terminate all or any part of this Agreement, effective on any date that Metro chooses following the 30-day period. Metro shall notify Grant Recipient in writing of the effective date of the termination. C. Grant Recipient shall be liable to Metro for all reasonable costs and damages incurred by Metro as a result of and in documentation of the default. Following such termination, should Metro later determine or a court find that Grant Recipient was not in default or that the default was excusable (e.g. due to a labor strike, fire, flood, or other event that was not the fault of, or was beyond the control of, Grant Recipient) this Agreement shall be reinstated or the parties may agree to treat the termination as a joint termination for convenience whereby the rights of Grant Recipient shall be as set forth below in Section 8. 8. Joint Termination for Convenience Metro and Grant Recipient may jointly terminate all or part of this Agreement based upon a determination that such action is in the public interest. Termination under this provision shall be effective only upon the mutual, written termination agreement signed by both Metro and Grant Recipient. 9. Oregon Constitution and Tax Exempt Bond Covenants Grant Recipient acknowledges that Metro's source of funds for the Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program is from the sale of voter-approved general obligation bonds that are to be repaid using ad valorem property taxes exempt from the limitations of Article XI, sections 11, l lb, 11 c, 11 d, and 11 e of the Oregon Constitution, and that the interest paid by Metro to bond holders is currently exempt from federal and Oregon income taxes. Grant Recipient covenants that it will take no actions that would cause Metro not to be able to maintain the current status of the real property taxes imposed to repay these bonds as exempt from Oregon's constitutional property tax limitations or the income tax exempt status of the bond interest under IRS rules. In the event Grant Recipient breaches this covenant, Grant Page 5 — Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 Recipient shall undertake whatever remedies are necessary to cure the default and to compensate Metro for any loss it may suffer as a result thereof, including, without limitation, reimbursing Metro for any Projects funded under this Agreement that resulted in Grant Recipient's breach of its covenant described in this Section. 10. Liability and Indemnification As between Metro and Grant Recipient, Grant Recipient assumes full responsibility for the performance and content of the Work; provided, however, that this provision is not intended to, and does not, create any rights by third parties. To the extent permitted by Oregon law, and subject to the limitations and conditions of the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS chapter 30, and the Oregon Constitution, Grant Recipient shall indemnify, defend, and hold Metro and Metro's agents, employees, and elected officials harmless from any and all claims, demands, damages, actions, losses, and expenses, including attorney's fees, arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of this Agreement by Grant Recipient or Grant Recipient's officers, agents, or employees. Grant Recipient is solely responsible for paying Grant Recipient's contractors and subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between Metro and any such contractor or subcontractor. Page 6— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 11. Contractors' Insurance A. Grant Recipient shall require all contractors performing any of the Work to purchase and maintain at each contractor's expense, the following types of insurance covering the contractor, its employees and agents: 1. Commercial general liability insurance covering personal injury, property damage, and bodily injury with automatic coverage for premises and operation and product liability shall be a minimum of$1,000,000 per occurrence. The policy must be endorsed with contractual liability coverage. Grant Recipient and Metro, and their elected officials, departments, employees and agents, shall be named as additional insureds. 2. Automobile bodily injury and property damage liability insurance. Insurance coverage shall be a minimum of$1,000,000 per occurrence. Grant Recipient and Metro, and their elected officials, departments, employees, and agents, shall be named as additional insureds. Notice of any material change or policy cancellation shall be provided to Grant Recipient thirty(30) days prior to the change. B. This insurance required by Grant Recipient, as well as all workers' compensation coverage for compliance with ORS 656.017, must cover all contractors' operations under this Agreement, whether such operations are by a contractor, by any subcontractor, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any contractor or subcontractor. C. Grant Recipient shall require all contractors performing any of the Work to provide Grant Recipient with a certificate of insurance complying with this section and naming Grant Recipient and Metro as additional insureds within fifteen(15) days of execution of a contract between Grant Recipient and any contractor or twenty-four(24) hours before services such contract commence, whichever date is earlier. D. In lieu of the insurance requirements in Sections I LA through I I.D, above, Grant Recipient may accept evidence of a self-insurance program from any contractor. Such contractor shall name Grant Recipient and Metro as additional insureds within fifteen(15) days of execution of a contract between Grant Recipient and any contractor or twenty-four(24) hours before services such contract commence,whichever date is earlier. 12. Safety Page 7— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 Grant Recipient shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of employees, volunteers and others in the vicinity of the Work and the Project, and shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and local safety laws and building codes, including the acquisition of any required permits. 13. Metro's Right to Withhold Payments Metro shall have the right to withhold from payments due Grant Recipient such sums as necessary, in Metro's sole opinion, to protect Metro against any loss, damage or claim which may result from Grant Recipient's performance or failure to perform under this Agreement or the failure of Grant Recipient to make proper payment to any suppliers, contractors or subcontractors. All sums withheld by Metro under this Section shall become the property of Metro and Grant Recipient shall have no right to such sums to the extent that Grant Recipient has breached this Agreement. 14. Project Records, Audits, and Inspections A. For the term of this Agreement, Grant Recipient shall maintain comprehensive records and documentation relating to the Project and Grant Recipient's performance of this Agreement(hereinafter"Project Records"). Project Records shall include all records, reports, data, documents, systems, and concepts, whether in the form of writings, figures, graphs, or models, that are prepared or developed in connection with any Project. B. In accordance with Section 2 above, Grant Recipient shall maintain all fiscal Project Records in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Grant Recipient shall maintain any other records necessary to clearly document: (i) Grant Recipient's performance of its obligations under this Agreement, its compliance with fair contracting and employment programs, and its compliance with Oregon law on the payment of wages and accelerated payment provisions; (ii) Any claims arising from or relating to (a) Grant Recipient's performance of this Agreement, or(b) any other contract entered into by Grant Recipient that relates to this Agreement or the Project; Page 8— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 (iii) Any cost and pricing data relating to this Agreement; and (iv) Payments made to all suppliers, contractors, and subcontractors engaged in any work for Grant Recipient related to this Agreement or the Project. C. Grant Recipient shall maintain Project Records for the longer period of either (a) six years from the date the Project is completed, or(b)until the conclusion of any audit, controversy, or litigation that arises out of or is related to this Agreement or the Project and that commences within six years from the date the Project is completed. D. Grant Recipient shall make Project Records available to Metro and its authorized representatives, including, without limitation, the staff of any Metro department and the Metro Auditor,within the boundaries of the Metro region, at reasonable times and places, regardless of whether litigation has been filed on any claims. If the Project Records are not made available within the boundaries of Metro, Grant Recipient agrees to bear all of the costs incurred by Metro to send its employees, agents, or consultants outside the region to examine, audit, inspect, or copy such records, including, without limitation, the expense of travel,per diem sums, and salary. Such costs paid by Grant Recipient to Metro pursuant to this Section shall not be recoverable costs in any legal proceeding. E. Grant Recipient authorizes and permits Metro and its authorized representatives, including,without limitation, the staff of any Metro department and the Metro Auditor, to inspect, examine, copy, and audit the books and Project Records of Grant Recipient, including tax returns, financial statements, other financial documents relating to this Agreement or the Project. Metro shall keep any such documents confidential to the extent permitted by Oregon law, subject to the provision of Section 12(F)below. F. Grant Recipient agrees to disclose Project Records requested by Metro and agrees to the admission of such records as evidence in any proceeding between Metro and Grant Recipient, including, but not limited to, a court proceeding, arbitration, mediation or other alternative dispute resolution process. G. In the event the Project Records establish that Grant Recipient owes Metro any sum of money or that any portion of any claim made by Grant Recipient against Metro is not Page 9— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 warranted, Grant Recipient shall pay all costs incurred by Metro in conducting the audit and inspection. 15. Public Records All Project Records shall be public records subject to the Oregon Public Records Law, ORS 192.410 to 192.505. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting Grant Recipient's ability to consider real property transactions in executive session pursuant to ORS 192.660(1)(e) or as requiring disclosure of records that are otherwise exempt from disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Law (ORS 192.410 to 192.505) or Public Meetings Law (ORS 192.610 to 192.690). 16. Law of Oregon; Public Contracting Provisions The laws of the state of Oregon shall govern this Agreement and the parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the state of Oregon. All applicable provisions of ORS chapters 187, 279A, 279B, and 279C, and all other terms and conditions necessary to be inserted into public contracts in the state of Oregon, are hereby incorporated as if such provisions were a part of this Agreement. Specifically, it is a condition of this Agreement that Grant Recipient and all employers working under this Agreement are subject to and will comply with ORS 656.017 and that, for public works subject to ORS 279C.800 to 279C.870 pertaining to the payment of prevailing wages as regulated by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, Grant Recipient and every contractor and subcontractor shall comply with all such provisions, including ORS 279C.836 by filing a public works bond with the Construction Contractors Board before starting work on the project, unless exempt under that statute. 17.Notices and Parties' Representatives Any notices permitted or required by this Agreement shall be addressed to the other party's representative(s) as set forth below and shall be deemed received (a) on the date they are personally delivered, (b) on the date they are sent via facsimile, or (c) on the third day after they are deposited in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, by certified mail return receipt requested. Either party may change its representative(s) and the contact information for its representative(s) by providing notice in compliance with this Section of this Agreement. Page 10— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 Grant Recipient's Designated Representatives: Steve Martin 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97233 Email: steve@tigard-or.gov Metro's Designated Representatives: Natural Areas Bond Program Manager Metro Regional Center 600 N.E. Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97223 Fax (503)-797-1849 with copy to: Metro Attorney 600 N.E. Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97223 Fax (503) 797-1792 18. Assi ng ment Grant Recipient may not assign any of its responsibilities under this Agreement without prior written consent from Metro, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 19. Severability If any term or provision in this Agreement shall be adjudged invalid or unenforceable, such adjudication shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of the Agreement, which remaining terms and provisions shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 20.No Waiver of Claims; Modifications Metro's failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver by Metro of that or any other provision of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended Page 11 — Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Por NE Grand Ave. Portland,OR 97232-2736 (503)797-1700 only by written instrument signed by both Metro and Grant Recipient and no waiver, consent, or change of terms of this Agreement shall bind either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. 21. Intejration of Agreement Documents All of the provisions of any proposal documents including, but not limited to, Requests for Proposals, Grant Proposals and Scopes of Work that were utilized in conjunction with the award of this Grant are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference; provided, however, that the terms described in Sections 1 through 21 of this Agreement and in Exhibit A shall control in the event of any conflict between such terms and such other incorporated documents. Otherwise, this Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between Metro and Grant Recipient and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. The law of the state of Oregon shall govern the construction and interpretation of this Agreement. The Parties, by the signatures below of their authorized representatives, hereby acknowledge that they have read this Agreement, understand it, and agree to be bound by its terms and conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on the day and year indicated below. CITY OF TIGARD�Q METRO Signature ha Be ett etro Chief Operating Officer Print Name: Ma�-`�^a L' W'►� Title: �► Ma"�°I Date: 1 q 2 Date: Page 12— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems CMETRO nd Ave. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT 60ONPortlanndd,,OR R 9772323 2-2736 (503)797-1700 ATVE AS TO FORM BY: ! � lgnature Hope Whitney Print Name: 0-4nSeniorAssistant Metro Attorney ��/`��/�'' Title: C C T Y Date: /h�2e�� Date: Page 13 — Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems i METRO d Ave. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT 60o"Portlanndd,,OOR R 9772323 2-2736 (503)797-1700 APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Signature Hope Whitney Senior Assistant Metro Attorney Print Name: Title: Date: Date: Page 13— Capital Grants Award IGA/Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems METRO? 600 NE Grand Ave. Scope Of Work — Exhibit A (03)7n9?OR0907232-2736 503 Metro Contract No. 932931 CAPITAL GRANTS PROGRAM GRANTS AGREEMENT I. Project Title/Project Number: Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems II. Grant Recipient contact: Jeff Peck Senior Engineering Technician City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 jeffp@tigard-or.gov 503-718-2466 III. Budget Total cost of project: $ 1,300,869 Grant award $ 390,000 Financial match $ 806,869 In-kind match $ 104,000 IV. Project location Behind Fowler Middle School in Tigard, OR (10865 SW Walnut Tigard, OR 97223) V. Scope of Work This scope of work sets forth the work and requirements the Grant Recipient shall undertake as part of Metro's Nature in Neighborhood Capital Grants program grant award. The original grant application (see attached Attachment 1) sets forth the scope of work except as modified or added to herein in accordance with the description of park elements and funding in Attachment 2: • Phase 1 scope of work will include improvements to the education center, resurfacing of trails, and oak savanna restoration. These improvements, with the exception of the oak savanna restoration, will be completed in 2016. • Phase 2 scope of work will be changed to include the installation of a wetland boardwalk (Fanno Creek Boardwalk),forested wetland boardwalk, oak savanna and forested wetland restoration, oak savanna overlook, and one nature play area. One nature play area (not two) will be constructed.The play area will be located in the lower portion of the site by the restroom and picnic shelter location and will be larger than was originally planned. Phase 2 will be completed 2016—2018. • The Project budget is revised as indicated in Attachment 3. With Metro's approval, funds that are not needed as projected in a budget line item may be applied toward other budget line items described on Attachment 3. • Future phases are not included in this scope of work. Revised November 2005 Form 3301 METRO? 600 NE Grand Ave. Scope Of Work — Exhibit A (03)7n9?OR0907232-2736 503 • Expenditures associated with design consultants, permits and bid documentation incurred after December 6, 2013 can be counted toward the matching requirements of the grant program, but will not be reimbursed. • Update the management plan for Dirksen Nature Park to include monitoring the impact of the proposed soccer field on the emergent wetland and address impacts accordingly. Project Benchmarks and Deliverables Benchmark 1: Pre-construction • Complete design documents • Acquire permits • Complete bid documents • Contractor selection Deliverable 1: Grant Recipient will notify Metro as these benchmarks are met. Benchmark 2: Installation of improvements Deliverable 2: Invoices documented expenses incurred that will be reimbursed by Metro as well as expenses to be used for financial and in-kind match. Benchmark 3: Update management plan for Dirksen Nature Park Deliverable 3: Grant Recipient will submit a copy of the management plan. Benchmark 4: Youth and community engagement activities Deliverable 4: Include a summary of Northwest Youth Corps, Fowler Middle School staff and students,the Tualatin Riverkeepers and other community participation in the project, including non-native plant removal, trail restoration, and planting. Publicity As provided in Section 5 of the Intergovernmental Agreement, Grant Recipient shall place at the Project's location signage that communicates that funding for the Project came from Metro's Voter-approved Nature in Neighborhoods Grant Program. Metro may withhold final reimbursement payment until such signage has been placed. In addition, Grant Recipient shall recognize in any publications, media presentations, or other presentations referencing the Project, produced by or at the direction of Grant Recipient, that funding for the Project came from Metro's Voter-approved Nature in Neighborhoods Grant Program. Revised November 2005 Form 3301 METRO? 600 NE Grand Ave. Scope Of Work — Exhibit A (03)7n9?OR0907232-2736 503 VI. Reporting Requirements: a. Bi-Annual Progress Reports: In addition to the Benchmarks and Deliverables set forth above, once work has begun, Grant Recipient shall provide to Metro a progress report, documenting the status of the Project at least every six months. A progress report shall be included with every reimbursement request submitted by Grant Recipient and when the Project benchmarks identified above are met. b. All progress reports shall provide the following details: an account of the work accomplished to date, a statement regarding Grant Recipient's progress on meeting benchmarks, the percentage of the Project completed, a statement as to whether the Project is on schedule or behind schedule, a description of any unanticipated events, and data regarding success indicators. All progress reports submitted by Grant Recipient shall be in the Progress Report Form provided by Metro unless Metro approves another reporting method in order to provide consistency with other project funders. c. Final Report: Grant Recipient must submit a final report and final reimbursement request within 60 days of the earlier of(a)the Project completion date or (b)the expiration date of the Intergovernmental Agreement. The final report shall include full and final accounting of all expenditures,the value and source of matching funds, a description of work accomplished,volunteer hours and participation, Project photos (including a photo of the signage acknowledging the Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program participation), and data on success indicators.The final report submitted by Grant Recipient shall be in the Final Report Form provided by Metro unless Metro approves another reporting method in order to provide consistency with other project funders. I. Project Payment and Reimbursement a. Metro will reimburse Grant Recipient$1.00 for every$3.00 of out-of-pocket costs expended after the effective date of the Intergovernmental Agreement to complete the project, consistent with the original grant application, up to but not exceeding Metro's total grant award of three hundred ninety thousand and 00/100 dollars ($390,000). In no event shall Grant Recipient request or expect reimbursement from Metro in excess of that amount. b. Payments will be processed as reimbursement for costs incurred and paid by the Grant Recipient. c. RETAINAGE: Metro will reserve as retainage from any reimbursement payment an amount equal to five (5%) percent of the requested reimbursement amount. The retainage will not be disbursed to Grant Recipient until the Project is fully completed and finally approved by Metro. Following completion of the Project and approval by Metro, Metro will deliver to Grant Recipient the entire retainage as part of the final reimbursement payment. d. To request the reimbursement of allowable expenses, Grant Recipient will complete Metro's Reimbursement Request Form and submit an itemized statement of work Revised November 2005 Form 3301 METRO? 600 NE Grand Ave. Scope Of Work — Exhibit A (03)7n9?OR0907232-2736 503 completed and an accounting of all expenses incurred during the current reimbursement period. A progress report shall accompany all reimbursement requests. The form, statement, and report shall be sent to: M ETRO ATTN: ORIANA QUACKENBUSH 600 NE GRAND AVE PORTLAND OR 97232-2736 e. Metro will make a reimbursement payment for those items identified in the Scope of Work or subsequent amendments to the Intergovernmental Agreement. Substitutions or changes of elements of the Project that have not been approved by Metro are not eligible for reimbursement. f. Payment shall be made by Metro on a Net Fifteen (15) day basis upon approval of reimbursement request. II. Success Indicators Grant Sponsor agrees to monitor the Project for three consecutive years following the completion of the Project and Grant Recipient agrees to report the following information to Metro upon completion of the Project. • Success Indicator 1 Demonstrate commitment to the long-term maintenance of this investment. The Grant Recipient shall provide data from monitoring efforts associated with plantings survival, control of invasive vegetation and oak habitat enhancement as well as a description of how the monitoring results contribute to on-going maintenance activities. • Success Indicator 2 Demonstrate that the site is being used for conservation education. The Grant Recipient shall provide data regarding the use of the site by Fowler Middle School and the Tualatin River Keepers. Revised November 2005 Form 3301 METRO? 600 NE Grand Ave. Scope Of Work — Exhibit A (03)7n9?OR0907232-2736 503 ATTACHMENT 1 GRANT APPLICATION Revised November 2005 Form 3301 ok9f) �t O Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Check one: F-1 Cover Sleet Contract 932931 ❑ Letter of interest ATTACHMENT X Final Pr000sal Project Name Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk Through Northwest Ecosystems Applicant Organization City of Tigard Contact Name Steve Martin Address L13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 Email steve@tigard-or.gov Is the applicant organization a registered 501(c)(3)? ❑ Yes x No If Yes,what is the EIN? Public Agency (if different from applicant) Same as above. Contact name E Phone Address Email —7i] Site Address or Across the street from 10835 SW Tigard Street and Name Dirksen Mature Park Location behind Fowler Middle School. Evaluation criteria: ❑ ReNature ❑ ReGreen X Both Project Summary(50 words or less) Tigard,TRK, Fowler School, CWS and Northwest Youth Corps will improve Dirksen Nature Park to enhance visitors' experiences of northwest ecosystems including; (1) restoring forested wetland/installing a boardwalk to view the bayou setting(2) restoring savannah/installing an overlook to view meadow and oaks(3) building two nature play areas. Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grant funding $390,000.00 1 If submitting more than one proposal, NIA Recuest please rank this proposal in order of priority. Total project cost $ $2,939,943.00 We, the undersigned, attest that to the best of our knowledge the information in this application is true and that all signatories have authorization to submit this grant application to Metro's Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program. Applicant Organization Name City of Tigard Printed Name St ve Martin —Parks Director Signature pate Januar�23, 014 Public Agency Organization Name Same as above. Printed Name Signature Date s� w January 23, 2014 City of Tigard Metro Natural Areas Program Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232 Re: Dirksen Nature Park—A Walk through Northwest Ecosystems Dear Capital Grants Review Committee: Saving the site now known as Dirksen Nature Park began as a community effort of support and love for this beautiful natural area. Owned by the local school district and used for decades as an outdoor classroom, the district was forced to declare the site surplus in 2008. With acres of developable land, the community feared losing their outdoor classroom forever. Multiple local, regional, and state partners came together to raise funds to purchase the property and the City of Tigard successfully gained ownership in 2010. Dirksen Nature Park's first few years have been full of participation. Tualatin Riverkeepers hosts summer nature camps and classrooms of children from around the Tualatin Basin. Fowler Middle School staff and students working with Clean Water Services continue to work on restoration of Summer Creek and enhance the habitat on site. This participation has created ownership and pride in the park and very little vandalism despite the extensive use of the site. City staff have removed debris and have contracted to remove acres of Himalayan blackberry from the site. Tigard is currently working to develop its second largest park and first nature park. Finding funding for such a large undertaking would be very difficult without the support of multiple partners. Tigard would be pleased to have Metro as an active partner and is seeping the investment of a Nature in Neighborhood Capital Grant. Sincerely, Steve Martin City of Tigard Parks Director Enclosure 13125 SW Hall Blvd. * Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov 4111111111111111111 Ranh.— PROJECT DESCRIPTION Introduction and Project Overview Dirksen Nature Park houses a number of distinctly different ecosystems all within close proximity to each other. This mix of ecosystems makes the Park a very rich habitat for native plants and animals and much of the park is protected by a METRO Conservation Easement. See Figure 1 and 2. The site is located in the heart of a well-developed urban area and is beloved by the community. The City of Tigard, together with its partners, proposes to complete native area restoration and to develop facilities for park visitors to experience these unique settings. The goal is to provide enhanced experiences of these areas by playing up the most unique qualities of each. These facilities will be designed to significantly limit the impacts on the park-s natural resources. Restoration at Dirksen Nature Park has been a team effort since its purchase in 2010 and is a requirement under some of the funding sources used to secure the property. The site has proven to be a rich resource for environmental education programs. The pictures above shows children enjoying tours and camps at the park. With no formal recreation program in place at the city, environmental education programs are possible because of Tigard's valued partners. They include Tualatin Riverkeepers (TRK) who bring many diverse visitors to the park through their tours and camps; Fowler Middle School staff/students who continue to use the site for education and restoration plantings, and Clean Water Services (CWS)who continues to provide needed native plants and staff to serve as interpreters for tour groups and middle school kids. The proposed grant project will provide ongoing opportunity for both residents of Tigard and our regional nature park visitors to explore and restore. The project will also provide job skill development as our new partner Northwest Youth Corp joins the team! Site History and Project Background The 48-acre Dirksen Nature Park is designated as a community park in the City's 2009 Park System Master Plan. The City purchased the 5.3 million property through multiple transactions beginning in December of 2010. Over 2.5 million in grant support for the project came from state, regional, and local agencies eager to support the acquisition and development of this nature park in Tigard. Key steps in the acquisition and planning of the park include; (1) in 1974 the Tigard-Tualatin School District acquires 100-acres and develops Fowler Middle School. Since this time, the school district uses the open areas of the site for playfields and physical education and uses the creeks, wetlands, and wooded areas for outdoor learning; (2) in 2001,the City develops the Fanno Creek Trail which extends through the site along the eastern boundary next to Fanno Creek's riparian zones; (3) in 2006,the school district declares the open space portion of the property surplus and the community becomes worried about loss of this valued natural area; (3) In 2007, with urging from community members and with regional concerns about losing the site to development, the Trust for Public Land negotiates an exclusive option-to- purchase agreement to protect the property until it can be placed in public ownership; (5) In 2010,the City purchases the first 42-acres of the park with Parks Bond funds, grant awards from METRO and Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), and public agency contributions from Clean Water Services (CWS) and Washington County; (6)As part of the grant process, a conservation easement was finalized between the City and Metro protecting 35-acres of significant woodlands and wetlands, and the City agrees to provide environmental education on the site; (7)ln January 2011,a draft Natural Resource & Management Plan is completed and provided to Metro outlining how different habitat areas will be managed on site; (8) In April 2011, the City acquires three adjacent parcels located along Tigard Street,totaling 5 acres; (9) In August 2011, a draft Environmental Education Plan for the park is submitted to OWEB; and (10) In June of 2012 a master plan is competed for the park. See Figure 3 and Attachment 1 to review the master plan and its associated report. (11)The Park goes through the permit process that allows the site to become Tigard's second largest park and finalize the draft management and education plans. With significant input from key stakeholders and the public, the master plan is designed to achieve balance between resource protection and public access, which is required to meet the requirements of Metro and OWEB acquisition grants. Scope of Work As mentioned previously, the city has under gone an extensive public input process and developed a corresponding master plan for Dirksen Nature Park. See Figure 3 to view the Final Master Plan. The proposed grant project includes the development of three major components of the master plan; 1. Forested Wetland Restoration and Development of a Boardwalk 2. Oak Savanna Restoration and Development of an Overlook 3. Two Nature Play Areas Forested Wetland Restoration and Boardwalk. Nestled in the heart of the Natural Resource Easement, in the center of Dirksen Nature Park, is a forested wetland. It houses a wide variety of wildlife attracted to the area by the water,tree canopy, and plentiful food sources. See attached photos.This wetland has an ever changing character. In the winter up to two feet of water stands in a "bayou-like"forest of ash, oak, and alder. As spring arrives,the site's native perennial plants come to life and thigh high vegetation of arching false Salomon's seal along with the blue blossoms of camas make a showy display. As summer arrives the standing water slowly evaporates and the shade tolerant slough sedge rustles under the dappled light of summer's mature tree canopy. Unfortunately the health of this wetland is threatened by numerous demand trails and the presence of non-native plants like English Ivy, Himalayan Blackberry, and Old Man's beard. The project will restore and protect the forested wetland by: (1) Removing non-native vegetation and abandoning old demand trails. This work will be completed by trained youth corps working on gaining experience in land management and basic employment skills. Approximately 1500 feet of old demand trails will be removed along with non- native plants within the forested wetland. (2)Replanting with native emergent vegetation. This work will be completed by Fowler Middle School students and children attending TRK's field trips. Clean Water Services and the city will provide plants and technical assistance for these projects. TRK's volunteer naturalists will provide the young planters with training and leadership. Summer camp kids will monitor the plantings and provide water as needed through the dry summer months to raise plant survivorship. (3)Establishing a new trail and boardwalk . The new trail, approximately 720 feet long, will be sited outside of the wetland and will lead to a single access point into the wetland. This single access point will be served by an elevated boardwalk to minimize impacts to this wetland. The boardwalk will lift users just above the standing water,jog around trees at the edge of the wetland, and will provide windows through the decking for visitors to have a clear view of the plants below. All aspects of the boardwalk will be designed to allow people to experience this unique bayou-like ecosystem but to keep them separated to minimize impacts to the area. The boardwalk will be designed to be extremely interesting so that park users will want to access the area in this single location. This complete reworking of site access, including providing a boardwalk, will be the single most important component to long term protection of the forested wetland. Oak Savannah Restoration and Overlook . A remnant oak savanna runs along the northern boundary of the site. The area has been impacted by past farming and is currently covered in non-native grasses, English Hawthorn trees, lawn grasses, Himalayan Blackberry, and English ivy. The project will allow park users to once again feel the open nature of flowing grassland dotted with statuesque Oregon White Oak. The goal is to develop an open expansive view of this majestic ecosystem that will show off native grasses flowing in the wind and brightly colored wildflowers announcing the arrival of spring and providing color through fall. The project will restore and protect the oak savanna by: (1) Removal of invasive trees, shrubs, and grass species. This work will be completed by experienced native restoration specialists. All but the largest English Hawthorn have been removed from the site to date leaving large hawthorn trees for removed. Removal of non-native grasses will require experts in plant identification, timing of removal, and careful decisions about how to manage existing seed stocks in the soil. The City intends to secure a company with extensive experience in Oregon Oak Savanna restoration and will consult with Metro restoration staff to develop a final plan for restoration. (2) Planting of a native meadow, wet meadow, and oak trees. Oak savanna restoration will be carried out by experienced restoration specialist. It is expected to take approximately 2 to 3 years to establish native grass species at the site. (Irrigation stub outs have been designed into the park to assist with establishment of these species.) Volunteers will be used for shrub planting along the far southern edge of the savanna. In this area native black hawthorn will be installed to replace the existing wildlife values of the non-native hawthorn. Volunteers will also be used to install a dense native shrub hedge along Tigard Street to lower the long-term influx of lawn seed from the roadway into the savanna. Native Oaks will be planted throughout the savanna. Our volunteer resources with come primarily from four sources including TRK's tour kids, Fowler Middle School students, Washington County Juvenile Crews, and "Tree for All" volunteers. Volunteers will be organized and supervised by TRK staff, Fowler Middle School Teachers, Clean Water Services staff, and Tigard environmental coordinators. (3) Installation of an Oak Savanna Overlook. A unique overlook will be constructed at the highest elevation of the savannah. The overlook will include a simple widened walkway sunken slightly into the hill that will house a thick 18" tall glass "retaining" wall that will allow park user to peer into the secret underground world of grassland plant roots. This simple design will also enhance the very open feel of an oak savanna by allowing visitors to stand in this very open location. Nature Play Areas.The project will construct two play areas designed to provide park users with opportunities to climb, run,jump and build with rocks, logs, and other natural features. The larger nature play area will be sited on the outer edge of the park's mowed playfield to limit impacts to the more sensitive natural areas in the park. It will be sited between the mowed play area and the edge of the forest. The play area will include stacked log and rock climbing areas and will have logs and other natural materials available for park users to build with. The area will be covered in play chips and will be near the new restroom and picnic tables. It will be designed to allow nature park users to linger and to play outside of the most sensitive areas of the park, adjacent to the Fanno Creek Trail. The second, smaller nature play area will be located near the future parking area on Tigard Street. This small play area is intended to provide an area for small children to freely play without disturbing the natural features of the park. Located near parking, it won't require a long walk for small children and will be located in the buffer area between the parking lot and the nature park. All facilities developed under this project will provide universal access to the public and will meet the Americans with Disabilities Act. EVALUATION CRITERIA With both Key components of the proposal being ecological restoration and the enrichment of people's experience with nature, the project meets both "Re-Nature" and "Re-Green" criteria. "Re-Nature" "The project improves how ecological processes contribute to overall ecosystem health...Restores diverse riparian vegetative structure or stream character...........Increases fish passage and/or wildlife crossings" As described above, the project will restore both a forested wetland and a remnant oak savanna, each of these ecosystems are considered the highest value habitats per the Regional Conservation Strategy. These habitats are considered to be dwindling in the region and their locations next to the Fanno and Summer creek riparian forests make them even more valuable. Abandoning demand trails in these habitat areas will strengthen wildlife corridor connections between the park and the stream corridors to the east, north, and south of the park. By eliminating trail crossings and consolidating trails, wildlife will have easier access to 34.5 acres of restored riparian corridor between Fowler Middle School and the developed portions of Summerlake Park. They will also have easier access to 156 acres of publicly owned riparian corridor running downstream along Fanno Creek to Bonita Avenue and 56.5 acres of restored riparian corridor running upstream along Fanno Creek from the Nature Park to Scholls Ferry Road. See Figure 4 for the locations of these connections overlayed on the Regional Conservation Strategy Habitat Map. "Re-Green" (1)The project should enrich people's experience of nature and strengthen a physical connection to the region's ecology......the project will serve a group of people that do not currently have strong access to nature. As described above, the over-riding intent of this capital project is to develop infrastructure that will allow Dirksen Nature Park users to feel the full openness and beauty of an oak savannah, to see the canopy and watery nature of the forested wetland, and to be able to move natural objects around, climb rocks and logs and get down in the dirt at the natural play areas. The City of Tigard Park's Department currently offers no recreation programs and under the requirements of grants used to the purchase the property is required to provide rich education experiences at Dirksen Nature park. To fulfill this requirement,Tigard contracts with our valued partner Tualatin Riverkeeper's (TRK). TRK provides nature education tours, programs, and summer camps at the park. TRK places a specific focus on outreach to under-served populations across the Tualatin River watershed. TRK currently brings 10 to 15 classrooms of children from across the basin to Dirksen Nature Park every year. The goal for tour recruitment is 75%Title 1 schools. TRK has been successful in reaching this goal. When bus funding became an issue to reach underserved groups Tigard and TRK were able to partner with Tualatin River Partners for Clean Water who now offer bus grants to teachers who want to plan a trip to Dirksen Nature Park but have no way to get to the park. TRK also implements site visits with groups from Community Partners for Affordable Housing, a local non-profit group that develops low income housing in Washington County. TRK will continue to provide site tours and interpretation to Greenburg Oaks, Olsen Woods, and Spencer House, low income projects that house a high number of children. In 2013,TRK developed a relationship with the Good Neighbor Center; a family homeless shelter located within walking distance to Dirksen Nature Park, and has begun tours with the children attending the shelter's after-school program. Although it is sometimes the perception that all western suburbs are wealthy, 6 of the 10 elementary schools that serve Tigard are Title 1 Schools. Fowler Middle School, located immediately adjacent to the park has 37% of its population qualifying for reduced or free lunch. (2) The project should demonstrate ecological design solutions that are both effective and cost- efficient....leverages public dollars beyond the 2:1 match.. The city will be putting up over a 2:1 match for this project. Tigard passed a parks bond in 2010 and working with their citizen Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, placed a high value on the purchase of parks land while land prices were down during the recent recession. The city has been able to leverage these park bond dollars very effectively but does not have adequate funding to complete the entire development desired at Dirksen Nature Park. With concerns for impacts to natural resources at the park as it becomes more and more popular,the city would like to be able to develop the facilities that will control access of the public to the most sensitive habitats. However, at this time more funding will be required. See the budget narrative for a detailed description of our funding. (3) The project benefits beyond the project itself. This could be demonstrated in the following ways..........the project brings together individuals and organizations to address community concerns beyond the environmental or ecological benefits....... This project provides multiple benefits. Northwest Youth Corp will be working at the site together with City,TRK, and CWS staff. This program is a career building program for youth ages 18-24 with barriers to employment. The grant project will allow these young adults to receive career training, earn a living allowance, achieve an AmeriCorps education award, and develop professional references within the community. The project also provides progress toward Tigard's new vision of developing the most walkable city in the region and increasing the health of local citizens. Expansion and improvement of the Tigard Park ecosystems will improve the value and marketability of Tigard as both a destination for business was well as an attractant for visitors. Increased property values and increased visitor traffic benefit the Tigard business economy and tax base, in turn stimulating investment in Tigard. The project progresses Metro's 2040 Growth Concept, as well as implementing important components of Tigard's Parks and Trail Plans. The project is consistent with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife urban wildlife corridors vision for the area. As mentioned above, the environmental education tours provide affordable opportunities for school field trips and recreational opportunities for struggling schools and low income youth programs. The project will also provide Washington County Juvenile division opportunities to work with their kids at the park, providing meaningful chances to work and give back to the community. The project will also support the continued us of the site as an outdoor classroom for science study. Proiect Feasibility The project will require final design, engineering, construction document preparation, construction, and long-term management of the forested wetland boardwalk,the oak savannah overlook, and the natural play areas. Below is a description of how each of these project stages will be completed. Master Planning As described in the project history section above, much work has already taken place to bring the project to where it is today. Extensive public input was gathered during property and master planning phase of the project and a list of participants in this process can be found in the Attached Master Plan. For a log of public meetings and responses to public input, please visit www.tigardor.gov/community/parks/dirksen nature park.asp. The master plan was completed in 2012 working with the consulting firm Vigil Agrimis. Key staff for the master planning effort were Paul Agrimis and Maureen Raad. Paul,vice President with the firm, is a professional wetland scientist, registered landscape architect, and civil engineer with over 30 years of experience in environmental planning and design. His work covers a broad range of water resources and natural resources projects including public input, site and regional analyses, conceptualization, feasibility studies, regulatory guidance, design, construction assistance, and monitoring. Maureen, a senior-level project manager, has 15 years of experience in planning, design, and natural resources restoration. She has expertise in restoration ecology,fluvial and tidal geomorphology, and in integrating human use of the landscape into sensitive natural settings. Our consultant team worked closely with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife biologist and other natural resource professionals including Metro and CWS biologists. Construction Document Preparation The construction document preparation phase of the project is in progress at the writing of this application and is being completed by WHPacific. Key WHPacific staff include Mark Hadley. As a registered landscape architect and studio director, with over 30 years of experience, Mark provides seasoned design services leading teams of diverse professionals. He specializes in the design of parks and public spaces. He has won numerous design awards including a Sustainable Design Award for the Burlington Bottoms Management Plan and is a regular speaker at park conferences. Mark 's list of successfully completed nature park projects includes Wallace Marine Park Boat Ramp and Bank Stabilization, in Salem; Bethany Lake Park Water Quality Enhancement, for Washington County; MCormick Nature park Trails and Master Plan, St Helens, OR; Wyeth Bench Environmental Education Center and Rustic Retreat Complex, Mt. Hood National Forest. He is supported by Casey Storey biologist and environmental coordinator. Casey specializes in wetland and fisheries biology,fish passage design, water quality monitoring, wetland delineation, Endangered Species Act compliance, aquatic entomology and environmental permitting. Also supporting the team is Phil Quarterman, an award winning wetland scientist and natural resources planner with 34 years of experience. Phil's training includes wetland work (functional assessments/delineations), planting plans specifications, construction, and natural resource monitoring. Further qualifications include stream bank and riparian zone restoration, plant community mapping, and Endangered Species Act documentation. The project civil engineer is Ken Rehms PE,with over 19 years of experience, his primary responsibilities are serving as lead project engineer, design expertise, construction engineering, field support, and scheduling project staff to ensure that project timelines are met. Construction and Long-term Management City of Tigard Department of Public Works will manage the design, construction, and long-term management of the project. The department has expertise in capital construction, park and natural area restoration and management. The design and construction of park infra-structure will be managed by Kim McMillian, the city's Assistant City Engineer. Kim has 30 years of experience in project management and has been with the city for 10 years. She oversees the team that implements all parks development for the city. This team includes engineers, consultants, and construction inspectors. They have recently completed East Butte Park; Fanno Creek Trail at Grant Avenue; and won the 2012 National Engineering Award for Burnham Greenstreet. All Tigard construction inspectors are certified erosion control specialists and work closely with Carla Staedter,Tigard's environmental coordinator. Carla will manage the development of the oak savannah and forested wetland. She has 5 years of experience in park and recreation planning, design, and construction. She has 25 years of experience with native area restoration and management. Carla is the 2011 recipient of the Professional Award for Outstanding Efforts to Enhance Oregon's Urban Forests. Steve Martin, the city's parks and streets manager,will oversee the team of professionals that will provide long-term management of Dirksen Nature Park. Steve has been with the city for 14 years, and has experience as a professional research forester and with landscape design, installation, and maintenance as well as management of landscape professionals. He oversees a staff of 9,which include park maintenance staff and a designated greenspace coordinator. Northwest Youth Corps as mentioned above will complete non-native removal, and will prepare abandoned trails for restoration. Fowler Middle School staff and kids will complete replanting of the demand trails at the forested wetland. Middle school students will also provide brainstorming and input on the design and location of interpretive elements for the forested wetland boardwalk and the oak savanna overlook. Riverkeepers will continue to plan,train tour volunteers, and run tours and summer camps from the park. As part of their programs they will work with Tigard and CWS to plant the forested wetland and the scrub edges of the oak savanna. Partnerships Tualatin Riverkeepers 11675 SW Hazelbrook Road Tualatin, OR 97062 (503) 218-2580 Contact: Isabel LaCourse, Environmental Education Coordinator Isabel@TualatinRiverkeepers.org Project Role: Environmental Education,Trail Building, Planting, Serving Tualatin Basin Folks without Strong Access to Nature, Interpretive Assistance Fowler Middle School 10865 SW Walnut Tigard, OR 97223 (503)431-5000 Contact: Sue Manning, Science Teacher smanning@ttsd.kl2.or.us Project Role: Environmental Education, Planting, Building Site Stewardship in the Students, Interpretive Assistance Clean Water Services 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Hillsboro, OR 97123 (503) 681-3600 Contact: Rich Hunter, Water Resources Program Manager hunterr@cleanwaterservices.org Project Role: Provide Native Plants to Support Volunteer Plantings,Technical Advisors for Restoration of Oak Savanna Northwest Youth Corps 2621 Augusta Street Eugene, OR 97403 (503) 743-8590 Contact: Tom Helmer, Program Director—Community Conservation Corps &OutDoor Oregon tom@nwyouthcorps.org Project Role: Non-native removal at the forested wetland, site preparation of abandoned demand trails, Project Evaluation and/or Monitoring The project will be monitored by Tigard staff,Tualatin Riverkeepers, and Fowler Middle School. One of the goals will be to document changes in the oak savanna and forested wetland. The site will be followed by Tigard's Environmental Coordinator, for a period of five years. The Coordinator will establish photo points and collect photos four times per year at the Forested Wetland and the Oak Savanna. Twice per year the site will be photographed from the City's bucket truck to track changes over time.The team will watch to ensure that park users are choosing the new circulation routes through the park. If demand trails re-appear they will be blocked to encourage the use of the new circulation systems. These restoration areas will also be monitored to see if additional planting is required and will be watched through the first 2 summers to see if watering will be required to help young plants become established. The Nature Play Areas and the new boardwalk will be monitored by parks maintenance staff to ensure they stay in good condition. The play areas will have components changed as needed by parks staff. Parks staff and Riverkeepers will watch for the popularity of items provided in the play areas and will use that information to continue to provide a rich natural play environment. Tigard intends to develop detailed management plans for both the forested wetland and the oak savannas to be incorporated in the existing natural resource plans for the Park. We will do outreach to Clean Water Services, Metro staff,TRK, and local community groups to provide needed technical input into the long-term management of these resources. The plans will be completed 3 years after project completion to allow for time to see how the site responds to the changes. Tigard and its project partners will work with other agencies and non-profit groups who have experience in the restoration of oak savanna habitat. We will contact Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to see if wildlife surveys could be completed to document usage of the site and to assess if any actions are required to improve habitat. Budget Documents The city completed preliminary master planning of Dirksen Nature Park in 2012. At the preparation of this grant application, the city has construction documents for the project at 70%completion. Funding is not available to construct all elements of the park. Currently the City has funding to complete restroom construction, education center improvements, paved and soft trails,the site parking lot, and the required street improvements. The city intends to develop the property over four phases. The project timeline for completion of the four phases is: • Phase I—slated for summer 2014 includes (1)the restroom/shelter; (2) improvements to the education center; and, (3) some resurfacing of soft trails that will be completed in partnership with TRK. • Phase II—slated for 2015 includes (1) required street improvements; (2) parking lot; and, (3)road access to the nature center. • Phase III—slated for 2016 includes (1)boardwalks; (2)the nature play areas; and (3)the oak savanna and forested wetland restoration • Phase IV—slated for 2017 will be the sportsfield improvements. (Costs for these improvements is not included in the budget.) See revised budget in Attachment 3 NATURE IN NEIGHBORHOODS CAPITAL GRANT (F3) PROJECT BUDGET WORKSHEET PROFESSIONALSERVICES COSTS • Estimate the hours of work directly related to your project for non-profit personnel, agency personnel, volunteers and consultants. You can delete rows that do not apply and/or add more specific descriptors. • Explain the tasks each is expected to complete in the budget narrative (i.e. surveys, design development, contruction documents,plan review, construction management). Pre-Agreement costs must occur AFTER the Invitation to Submit a Full Application and are not reimbursable. Agency&non-profit personnel time cannot exceed 10%of the grant request. Volunteers specifically doing project installation should be included in this section. financial match in-kind match grant request TOTAL A. Pre-Agreement 1. Non-profit staff $0.00 2. Agency staff $0.00 3. Consultants $0.00 4. Volunteers $0.00 B. Post-Agreement Costs $0.00 1. Non-profit staff $0.00 2. Agency staff $0.00 3. Consultants $100,000.00 $100,000.00 4. Volunteers $75,343.00 $75,343.00 Total for Professional Services 1 $100,000.001 $75,343.001 $0.001 $175,343.00 CONSTRUCTION COSTS Estimate the cost for all work elements of your project. Feel free to change the list. Specify in the budget narrative which work elements will be completed by volunteers and how you calculated the budget figure. financial match in-kind match grant request TOTAL A. Site Preparation $0.00 1. Mobilization & Bonding $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2. Clea rin /Demolition/Eros.Control $38,000.00 $38,000.00 3. Staking & Surveying $13,800.00 $13,800.00 B. Utilities $309,600.00 $309,600.00 C. Improvements/Materials $0.00 1. Restroom/Shelter $151,200.00 $151,200.00 2. Educaton Center Improvements $44,300.00 $44,300.00 3. Trails paved $50,500.00 $50,500.00 4. Trails soft surfaced $10,200.00 $3,000.00 $13,200.00 5. Nature Play Areas $100,000.00 $100,000.00 6 Wetland Boardwalks/Overlooks $117,000.00 $210,000.00 $327,000.00 7 Required Street Improvements $823,000.00 $823,000.00 8 Multi-Use Ballfield Renovation $0.00 9 Parkin Lots $77,800.00 $77,800.00 10 Community Gardens $30,000.00 $30,000.00 D. Permits $10,000.00 $10,000.00 E. Others, please list 1. Furnishings $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2. Interpretive Signage $60,000.00 $60,000.00 3. CWS Veg. Corridor Plantings $71,750.00 $71,750.00 4. Parking Lot Trees/Planting $27,700.00 $27,700.00 5. Oak Savanna Restoration $2,000.00 $50,000.00 $52,000.00 6. Forested Wetland Restoration $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $40,000.00 7. Irrigation $154,250.00 $154,250.00 8. Restroom Enclosure $4,500.00 $4,500.00 9. Contingency $218,000.00 Total for Construction Costs $2,756,6MOUJ ACQUISITION COSTS Please estimate the cost for all work elements. Please feel free to change the list. financial match in-kind match grant request TOTAL A. Purchase Price $0.00 B. Option Purchase $0.00 C. Option Reimbursement $0.00 D. Appraisal &Appraisal Review* $0.00 E. Title Report, insurance & documents $0.00 F. Phase I Enviro Assessment $0.00 G. Stewardship endowment $0.00 H. Management Plan Development $0.00 1. Baseline Documentation $0.00 Total for Acquisition Costs OTHER COSTS A. Travel (use current State of Oregon rates) $0.00 B. Overhead/Indirect costs -these can only be used as match. $0.00 $0.00 Totals for Other Costs TOTAL PROJECT COSTS c 0 \ B u m § t = % 0 -0 _0 ° ° ° = ) s3 o \ _0 \ > = S 0 g ¥■ o o = _ 0 k 0 \ f G E £ 2 = z > \ \ / 0 04 cu 0 � � � £ E 7 = o x \ 0 $ s § [ \ r ± % § 0 2 0 c ¥ 0 2 0 § / ± = s= = f � \ r co / _0 » ° > > = a $ _ = o / / I \ f o 0 E _ / f q - 0 2 G \ \ \ \ ■ I \ / � / \ / § G/ 2 e = G = o _ > I CD- LU 7 / y e R » 2 t = = c % _ = o •E E § 0 b } Oo ƒ / f ° § § \ \ 0-/ \ 0 / 5 \ / \ / / \ / / f _m / 2 \ C C \ m 7 It / ƒ \ 9 co � 2 \ q $ \ ( § \ � C: £ � E § / $ \ C2 « 2 E \ 2 \ cu / % E / \ § o � U X20 m ■ e CU ° @ q .00 0 5m7 \ 2 2 / \ / E o \ \ / D (D 2LL a 0 a\ § \ ) ƒ @ § \ 2 .+ = I / 2 ° � a ± - -z c- 0 § .§ E x x X X X ƒ 7 \ / \ / § 3 / \ r 2 § % E \ \ 0 a $ o / o « .0 0 E ) £ / / / d o / ± @ J o \ \ \ / \ \ / \ -0 £ 0.§ \ o ° � = o = £ 3 7 2 0 / » m 0 a G < a = 0 E § § 0 ® _ = o o ° ■ o / \ \ / ƒ m / G ° > / Via) a) L) £ ƒ = m « > _ « o = CO m 7 k E\ k G \ 2 = "-0 =3 E § \ \ & = CL 0 \ LLJ _0 - / = w ) w a $ w $ k O U / 0 IT �4�, hal � ,,I � �,•,=a !� � �`r �� ,�•Z • � �a •�.�, Ha t ,ice `h 3w�,e� s y ; - Aw b o� J H31 �' t 213ONnH1 05 IH 1 214 H190L 3AV-Aiio rIF411d-H1L06 }} ,1S r ti ]]AV �H180 L 3 AV' � rr H1r60L LLI W .. r ld r j. T VT dIF r�T �NjI Mt1r s ry .. ,L: . .. 3^` T.ERyr 113TH G LLO I— y A . AVE z q . e # ald HlEl4 `p, kf t +� JI LU 1 Le Y. Q - .7d H1bLL O r3AtJ H1SLL 2131 H t7AL aj r .�C 34A'VH-19`Lt AM14 YN 2131jH`l-LLL v> � Ste. r w ,SQA- LZ''q L tN AVE d , �"` .. �} Y ip 2131H18L4 a } F. �* As �. W �1 Z ,,... Z. T x.-� r , 7 '�'�:.' - w J Z 3T'V H 18 L 6, 5. W3� '<!! s¢" s�i ¢4 •� Qom• f��•f J t , e w s e f q bA P W •H UJ P � � I I deal a u j41.0 F d Mp J _ ! 1 � 1 a anti �I I s W bob � d•t 1 � i C + . .6 �,. uj C 03 An did Faaai za � I CL i �P� - -- ,. a.. — 76 M _ cu C) c�C r% a Q r-I +r M 4— ddb; LL- O �V31 L!'y M m Z L.) W Gr , CC i _ �, -ice �`''• � � � s "I' A � ..... --� pa1�s + L nu LLJ l m c m - LU -' -� pejj paa)ouuel _ I cu Ln Y M i rte+ m LZJ W �n \ F � tan in CD ` a _ I Ln U CL ECL a d � LU L LJ o 0 - `i Ch it z �•.� If o � � � o j rv000 L. `U a I ar O V ii �+ alruaAV OJIL19 MS d ..---------_..r4 a R Tv O VWLJ. ' LL m * x [1 d6 4J o , a ca od N m 75 > �'� - Q D Q3 44ij p co (6 C C1 Z 0- p c U c cn -0a i pip. © - Co -sc Pi 4 A iP U) 0 co � a a S yia.� fee 0 ca b sop IL L �r�r�u.rt► Ms ��a�,,��, � .a,+etr.e �71ri�M A j � � ana cPMI. THS a � lk N O rN — — 00 ti x a. N N JJ - ~ -- i 0 R `J U U CL i O G Qru y ,ld oo inn� M CD m Z vii wvs o s WLM o — � -Cev a° p a� '� 4- i m deal joei)ouuej - ---- -- -- �- ^ `� 1 a .M QI L.LJ i o �i %A oCLO ra I O % i N ai O I ai W �H � O 1 c 'I` rvoo -6. V �. M . y C. mU@AV 011eg MS WK Lod N O N Lp, 00 ra owl 7 - r :> r �,y ccO LL- 00 V1 V'1 M m z V) W z DC W x r LM O J v rz 01I C , cn ap y; N 4— Beal�laaa�ouue� v, — - _: _ � - -- ---- -�-- —r r /� IIS _ � I� II yI � f i •R Oo o cn o ~ > ar44 TIOL t vY O R-0 , v+ i N C LU u_ A. `J �+ PT N O anuan'd 011e �p . MS Ik jowl _ _ rN !— t— O r— rcs V OJ CD AP CD Baa :I I � z r14oo � , �, v I LU LU L/0) o y , v O , > ru CD cm k � a deal jaw)ouuei + J ICU IM i r p H LA a y lot SII Z C W = Ij y = bm ICU ++ i r n_c � Cu \/ a+ ♦ L C i W43. + a s � W �- Ali •� -' ' �I CL CL LU i .21 �\ anuantl 01111I MS Summer Creek Park Master Plan Key Stakeholder Meeting Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Meeting Notes Summer Creek Park Master Plan Key Stakeholder Meeting Thursday, February 8th, 2012 Summer Creek Park Education Building and Site 2:00 - 4:30 pm Attendees: City of Tigard: Steve Martin, Carla Staedter, Tom McGuire and Greg Stout City of Tigard Parks and Recreation Advisory Board: Troy Mears Conservation Technix: Steve Duh Vigil-Agrimis, Inc.: Paul Agrimis, Maureen Raad and Susie Mattke-Robinson Clean Water Services: Rich Hunter Tualatin Riverkeepers: Lori Kruz and Brian Wegener Friends of Fanno Creek: Sue Beilke Metro: Elaine Stewart and Robert Spurlock Fowler Middle School: Sue Manning Community Member: John Frewing Ash Creek Forest Management: John Goetz These notes focus on the group discussion that took place in the field and reflect the comments and opinions of the stakeholders in attendance. The project design team will balance these remarks with other public input in preparing the conceptual master plan design. The agenda and handouts (that follow these notes) summarize the project overview provided in the Education Center. These notes are organized by location to make them easier to follow. For example, a comment made about trails in coniferous upland forest was included in the discussion of that location even if the comment was made at a different location. Comments from phone interviews conducted prior to the meeting were added in a couple of locations to supplement the field notes. Summary of Key Stakeholder Input "High quality trails and high quality habitat will create a high quality experience" by Carla Staedter Habitat Types NW Native Ecosystems and species of note on the site include: ■ Oak Savannah (restored) ■ Ponderosas pine ■ Coniferous Northwest Forest ■ Camas ■ Riparian Floodplain Forest ■ Sunny South Facing Slopes ■ Emergent Wetland ■ Madrone ■ Forested Wetland ■ Reptiles ■ Scrub-Scrub Wetland ■ Birds • Minimize habitat fragmentation caused by trails. Consider habitat patches and wildlife migration corridors (ie. wetland to upland) when selecting alignments. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 1 March 21,2012 Summer Creek Park Master Plan Key Stakeholder Meeting Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division • Consider boardwalks, culverts, etc. to maintain habitat connectivity. • Decommission excess trail. • Take advantage of on-site wetland mitigation and upland restoration opportunities. Restore plant communities on-site. Environmental Education Education programs being supported include: ■ Tualatin Riverkeepers, field ■ Fowler Middle School trips (all Tigard and many ■ Recreation Users Washington County schools) ■ Tualatin Riverkeepers, summer camps • Learning is experiential: seeing, hearing, touching. Design should heighten the experience. • Provide access to habitats for education but do so in a way that limits impact to and degradation of the resource. For education, quiet surfaces (not gravel) are important so wildlife can be heard over foot fall. • Identify and enhance 5 to 6 major educational experiences for NW Native Ecosystems. • Maintain fewer, but higher-quality trails • Provide viewpoints for visual access to habitats to minimize habitat penetration by trails in sensitive areas (e.g., forested wetland). • Provide controlled access to Summer Creek for sampling in a degraded area so other areas can be restored. Recreation Recreation uses being considered include: ■ Education Center, drop off ■ Nature Play Area ■ Education Center, curb appeal ■ Baseball (1 field) ■ Parking for Trailhead and Park ■ Soccer (1 field) ■ Summer Creek Community Trail ■ Restroom ■ Trails ■ Shelter • Provide an accessible loop-trail alternative to the busy Fanno Creek Trail. • Community Trail alignment is most appropriate along SW Tigard Street. • Design trail system to discourage off-trail exploration by people and pets. • Designed elements should be integrated into the site • Consider incorporating interpretive elements into the design. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 2 March 21,2012 Summer Creek Park Master Plan Key Stakeholder Meeting Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Location-Specific Notes Site 1. Education Center on SW Tigard Street Proposed Activities: Enhance building curb appeal, add garden area, provide outdoor gathering area and provide bus drop-off/turnaround. Discussion Synopsis: There were no concerns raised by the group about the building, garden or gathering area elements. Bus drop-off is needed at the Education Center to reduce walking time and provide safe conditions for students. Dropping students at Fowler Middle School is not an option because the walk is too far. The education goal is for students to spend 95% of their time experiencing the site. A drop off at the Education Center provides for this and will also reduce conflicts between Middle School and Environmental Education students. Summer camp students are currently dropped off at the Education center by parents. Because the wetland boundary is close to the building consider roadside pull-off in lieu of turnaround to reduce site impact. Garden spaces uses could include: community gardens, native plant nursery (perhaps pollinator focused), eatables for summer camp and field trips. The function of the Education Center building is to provide restrooms, lunch location in rainy weather, and storage for supplies and student gear. Curb appeal improvements do not need to be elaborate and could include adding native vegetation, expanding the deck and replacing doors. Site 2. Nature Play Area on SW Tigard Street in Restored Oak Savanna Proposed Activities: Nature play area and oak savanna restoration. Discussion Synopsis: There some concerns raised by the group about including a nature play area in this location. Nature play was supported but this location (near traffic on SW Tigard Street and away from parking, park entry, and public services) were seen as problematic for safety reasons. Distributing play experiences around the site in different "ecosystems" was suggested though this might not provide children with the opportunity to meet and play with others in a designated nature play area. Consolidating play and environmental education uses would concentrate disturbance and reduce impacts to wildlife. Would a nature play area at the Education Center distract from education activities? If nature play is located along SW Tigard the design should provide a vegetated buffer/separation between the play area and street traffic. A dense native vegetation buffer along SW Tigard St will also protect oak savannah restoration site from weed seed. Traffic is loud when cars are present. Locating activity area away from street will help. Half-street improvements may be required. A continuous sidewalk will probably be needed in addition to the Community trail for local traffic. Try to integrate infrastructure into site. Runoff currently flows off SW Tigard St into the site. Consider Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 3 March 21,2012 Summer Creek Park Master Plan Key Stakeholder Meeting Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division using low impact development techniques (no curb and gutter, vegetated filter strip) to keep this water on-site. Design trails to discourage roaming off-leash dogs and desire-line trails. Seasonal closures could protect habitat during breeding season but would be difficult to enforce. Fencing could be used to keep users out of sensitive areas. Preserve open reptile basking habitats on south-facing slopes. Jackson Bottoms has good examples. Consider integrating habitat elements into the design of the developed locations along SW Tigard St. Since non-native English hawthorn are being removed, consider planting native hawthorn (these may hybridize with the non-native species) or other fruit-bearing trees like Serviceberry and Cascara to provide bird habitat. A covered bird watching location could be a nice amenity. Site 2.5/3.5. Forested Wetland Boardwalk Proposed Activities:Trails and environmental education. Discussion Synopsis: There were no concerns raised by the group about environmental education in this location. Habitat fragmentation and uncontrolled access were big concerns in this area. Creating a spur trail instead of a through trail was preferred. An elevated boardwalk would keep people on the trail and out of sensitive areas while allowing a unique user experience. Boardwalk nodes would need to accommodate 10 students. Design elements could include blind-like handrails and decking that allows the user to see open water below them. Accessing the forested wetland from the south will be the least impactful to wetlands. If access is provided from this location, upland forest fragmentation should be limited. Site 4. Skills Area in Coniferous Northwest Forest Proposed Activities:Trails, environmental education and skills course. Discussion Synopsis: There were no concerns raised by the group about environmental education in this location. Site currently vandalized (graffiti and fort building) and is devoid of understory vegetation. The hope is that vandalism will decrease with increased foot traffic. The size of the gathering area could be constrained by adding large wood at the perimeter. This would provide a nature play opportunity and would allow for education about the role of large wood. Replanting under the dense canopy would likely be challenging in the deep shade of this location. Summer Creek Park is an important habitat site for ponderosa pines. These will be replaced by Douglas fir and cedar over time without management these species. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 4 March 21,2012 Summer Creek Park Master Plan Key Stakeholder Meeting Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Selectively thinning them in this area could benefit ponderosa pine and provide a source of large wood. Is it appropriate to keep skills activity here? The existing trail network includes a through trail to SW Gallo and 113th Avenues. This trail should remain as it is an established site accesses. A nice loop is possible in this area but trail decommissioning is needed. Impacts to the riparian forest should be minimized when selecting trail alignments. Site 5. Water Quality Sampling Area in Summer Creek Riparian Floodplain Forest Proposed Activities: Paved trail, environmental education (water quality sampling), restroom and shelter (outside the 100-year floodplain). Discussion Synopsis: There were no major concerns raised by the group about the activities proposed in this area. The existing platform does not function for water quality sampling as it is too high. Currently the banks on either side of the creek are degraded due to uncontrolled access. A defined access for education is needed either on the north or south side of the creek to reduce habitat degradation. Adding to the existing stair and platform would consolidate impacts in one location. Water surface elevation fluctuates and should be factored into platform design. Incorporating historic flood elevations in to the design could be used as a teaching tool in this area. Asphalt and concrete paving surfaces were discussed for a trail connecting the Fanno Creek Trail with the bridge to Fowler Middle School. Maintenance currently accesses the Park from Fowler Middle School. Concrete is more expensive but longer lived, while asphalt is less expensive and consistent with other paved surfaces in the Park. National Marine Fisheries Service may object to asphalt in the 100-year floodplain. Site 3. Playing Field Proposed Activities: Remove northwest baseball backstop, add a soccer overlay in the outfield area of the southeast baseball field and provide a trail. Discussion Synopsis: There were some concerns raised by the group about the proposed activities in this area. There was some opposition to adding a soccer overlay as this would extend the recreational use season. The reconfigured playing fields will leave much of the northwest corner available for native plantings. The small wetland in this area would not be impacted by proposed activities and provides a good opportunity for on-site mitigation. Walkers use the west and north edges of the field to create a loop off of the Fanno Creek Trail. Developing a paved loop trail in this area would take advantage of sunny southern aspect and serve the active recreation areas and restroom. This trail alignment passes the riparian floodplain forest of Summer Creek, coniferous northwest forest, forested wetland, camas, quaking aspen, and ponderosa pine forest and so provides good interpretive opportunities. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 5 March 21,2012 Summer Creek Park Master Plan Key Stakeholder Meeting Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Site 6. Parking on SW Tigard Street Proposed Activities: Parking lot for Fanno Creek Trail and Community Park. Discussion Synopsis: It was after 4:00 by the time we reached this location so discussion was brief. No major concerns were raised by the group about the activities proposed in this area though adding paving to the site was a concern. Summer Creek Park will function as a Community Park and so will serve people from across Tigard. During acquisition, this parcel was targeted specifically to provide parking in order to limit the impact of additional cars on the surrounding neighborhood. Concentrating parking will allow for controlled access to the Park using designated trails. Low impact development techniques could be used in the parking lot design to limit impacts and provide an educational opportunity. There is a desire line trail used by children living north of SW Tigard St when accessing the Park and walking to school. A paved path connecting the parking lot to the Fanno Creek Trail in this area would formalize this route. An overlook of the Fanno Creek wetland could be incorporated to add an interpretive element. Summer Creek Community Trail Proposed Activities: Provide trail alignment in the park. Two alignments are proposed for this trail in the Tigard Greenway System Master Plan. One alignment follows SW Tigard St and one crosses the south side of Summer Creek Park connecting SW Gallo Ave to the Fanno Creek Trail. This trail was discussed at several sites. Discussion Synopsis: Habitat fragmentation and increased traffic (bike and ped) were concerns for the southern alignment. Paving the southern alignment was not favored. Integrating the trail into the area along the northern alignment was preferred. A vegetated buffer between the trail and SW Tigard would increase the sense of separation from the road. Modifications to the Fanno Creek Trail alignment and design could reduce wetland impacts and barriers to species migration. END Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 6 March 21,2012 Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting No. 1 Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Meeting Notes Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting Wednesday March 28, 2012 Tigard PW Building - 8777 SW Burnham Street 7:00 - 8:30 pm Attendees: See Sign in Sheet Project Overview: Following brief introductions and welcoming remarks, a presentation was given to share information about the site's conditions, constraints and current use, with special focus toward the extent of wetlands and the variety of habitat types. A range of potential park amenities was noted that include the upgrade and re-configuration of existing sports fields and the construction of a restroom, interpretive shelter, natural play area and trails. The majority of the park, approximately 35 acres, will remain as open space - a significant portion of which will undergo restoration. Two master plan concepts were discussed and review, and special attention was directed toward enhancements at the education center and a potential parking area off Tigard Street. These concepts were used during the group break-out sessions to elicit public feedback. Break-Out Exercise - Group 1 (10 people: 5 men and 5 women) Education Center The group was generally in favor of the proposed improvements at the Education Center. Environmental Education perspective preferred the bus drop-off to be located near the education center, with forty days annual usage. Some parents do not want children to have long walk through the site to education center from a drop- off at Fowler Middle School. The curb appeal improvements proposed for the existing double-wide structure were well supported. Walking Trails The group was interested in providing some accessible trails (strollers, etc.). Paved trails could be pervious pavement. Some members of the Group really liked the notion of a loop trail using the sidewalk along SW Tigard Street and a Community Trail offset from SW Tigard in a serpentine pattern. Others mentioned that the area along SW Tigard Street is a sensitive habitat area. Need to be aware of that when considering a busy trail. Maintaining access from the neighborhood southwest of the park is important. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 1 April 3,2012 Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting No. 1 Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Nature Play Area The Nature Play Area was supported but concerns were raised about not making it too brushy or wild so that parents can easily observe children at play and keep them safe. There were folks in favor of both proposed locations (near parking) but there was some concern that the play area might be a distraction if located near the education center. Locating the play area near parking and restrooms was recommended. Playing Field The group supported the proposed baseball field and soccer field overlay. Parking on SW Tigard Street This group was split on parking on SW Tigard. Some prefer looking at the education center location as an alternative to keep development away from habitat, and would like upland scrub/shrub habitat enhancements within the proposed parking area. Others expressed a need to improve safety along SW Tigard and saw an opportunity to provide needed parking adjacent to the Fanno Creek Trail. Summer Creek Community Trail A paved sidewalk/trail along SW Tigard Street is needed for safety of children and others moving along the corridor. Some voiced a desire for a planted buffer along this trail to separate it from SW Tigard Street. Traffic moves quickly on SW Tigard, often exceeding the 25 mph poster speed limit. Traffic calming and cross walks or crossing signal could be helpful for pedestrians and bikes crossing on the Fanno Creek Trail. A raised crossing for the Fanno Creek Trail was offered as one potential means to improve safety. (See comments under walking trails) Safety The group discussed vandalism of existing site (plantings and tree tagging) and had concerns about future facilities (restrooms). Prior homeless camps and prior use of the environmental education parking lot for parties and other activities were a concern. A park ranger or patrol program like THPRD's could help. Other A park sign should be installed. A phased development approach was discussed. This would allow for a simple start and slow growth in to the site. Break-Out Exercise - Group 2 (8 people: 7 men and 1 woman) Summer Creek Community Trail The group felt that it was redundant to have both a sidewalk and paved trail parallel to SW Tigard Street. Something in between Concept A and Concept B was preferred. A wider meandering sidewalk set further off the street with a planted screen Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 2 April 3,2012 Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting No. 1 Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division separating it from the road was preferred. Access points for people crossing the street should be incorporated into the design (could swoop back to curb rather than have spur sidewalks). If there is a bike lane on SW Tigard do we need a multi-modal trail in the park? From an Environmental Education perspective there was concern about having student's first nature experience be on a paved path as this is more of an Urban Park than Nature experience. Nature Play Area The preferred location for this activity was adjacent to both parking and restrooms. No designated park parking lot location is available near the ball fields (the proposed restroom location), though limited on-street spaces are available. There is parking at Fowler Middle School but only on SW Walnut Street. There are restrooms at the Education Center, but they are only available when the building is unlocked. A port-a-potty could be provided at either the Education Center or at the proposed parking lot location to serve the play area. From an Environmental Education perspective there was concern about locating the Nature Play Area at the Education Center because parking is needed at that facility when it is in use. Walking Trails Unpaved walking trails were the preferred amenity for the group. They favored the more extensive trail network in the southwest part of the site and liked the boardwalk elements that were proposed. They liked trails that follow existing alignments (where people want to go). Questions were asked about if providing accessible trails was required. But the group did not advocate for this. Parking on SW Tigard Street Given the amount of use that the proposed soccer and baseball fields will attract, the group felt that more parking might be needed. There was a desire to look more closely at the Education center to see if additional spaces could be provided there. Education Center The group was generally in favor of the proposed improvements at the Education Center. Water Quality Sampling Area Improvements are needed here to make sampling possible. Playing Field The neighborhood already had a lot of night- lighting and noise from the playing fields at Fowler Middle School. Not having lit fields at the park was a preference that is in keeping with habitat conservation goals for the property. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 3 April 3,2012 Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting No. 1 Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Safety There was a question about security lighting in the park. Steve Martin responded that the only place it might be appropriate was on the Fanno Creek Trail because it is considered a transportation corridor. The group supported this limited approach and did not advocate for including lighting in the plan. The biggest concern relative to lighting was for children walking to school. Off-Leash Dogs/Cats There was concern voiced about the amount of damage done to habitat and species by uncontrolled pets. Providing an off-leash area was briefly discussed but didn't seem to solve the real problem. It also seemed inconsistent with Habitat Conservation goals and would require a considerable amount of land. END Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 4 April 3,2012 Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting No.2 Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Meeting Notes Summer Creek Property Master Plan, Public Meeting Number 2 Thursday May 17, 2012 Tigard PW Building - 8777 SW Burnham Street 7:00 - 8:30 pm Attendees: See Sign in Sheet Project Overview: The meeting began with brief introductions, welcoming remarks, and an update on where the Summer Creek Property is in the master planning process. This was followed by a presentation that reviewed existing site conditions, constraints and uses, with special focus on the variety of habitat types, including wetlands found on the site. The Concepts presented at Public Meeting Number 1 were reviewed and the presentation summarized the feedback received from stakeholders and the public thus far. The presentation then reviewed the modification made to the earlier concepts to create the Concept Master Plan. The Concept Master Plan presentation and discussion was followed by a more detailed discussion of the education center improvements and the two nature play areas. Following the presentation there was an informal group discussion of the Concept Master Plan followed by a brief open house that allowed for more one-on-one discussion. Feedback received at the meeting is summarized below by topic. Discussion During the Presentation: Parking The Concept Master Plan shows parking for 10 to 15 cars near the Fanno Creek Trail and an additional 8 to 10 car overflow parking area at the Education Center. There was concern that additional parking may be required. The City will likely require parking along SW Tigard Street but a resident suggested that off-street parking would be preferable due to the high traffic speeds on SW Tigard Street and unsightliness of parked cars. The overflow parking spaces at the environmental education center were discussed briefly. The proposed paving material is a pervious pavement like grasscrete. There was support for this but traditional asphalt was also suggested as a better choice. Expanding parking in this area and/or the flexible use area was also discussed. Playing Field The location and orientation of the ballfields was generally supported. It was suggested that drainage be carefully considered in the baseball backstop area as well as on the soccer field. Soil amendments and drainage improvements may be required to improve playability. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 1 May 18,2012 Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting No.2 Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Restrooms Restroom location should consider the cost of providing water and sewer to the location. There was support for the proposed location form a use point-of-view (central, near the ballfields, away from Fowler Middle School, near parking lot). Education Center The proposed curb appeal improvements to the education center were generally favored and were not discussed at length. Community Garden Community garden space proposed near the education center will be used by both the education center (to grow native plants) and the public (as community garden space). There was concern that 15 beds would not be enough to satisfy demand. Adding more beds at the education center and/or expanding the garden in the flexible use area were discussed as options. Bird Watching A covered bird viewing area (like the amenity at Jackson Bottoms Wetland Preserve) would be appealing. Adding a cover to the proposed education center deck was discussed. Providing for this in the flexible use area farther from the road was also discussed and was preferred. Nature Play Area Nature play materials choice with regard to maintenance was discussed. Maintenance staff raised concerns about sand and seasonal water (mud) near restroom and parking lot. Maintenance has experienced difficulties with these materials and keeping public restroom facilities clean and in working order. Restrooms will likely be open year round. Wood chip materials are preferred to sand in play areas. Maintenance staff was also concerned that moveable parts would make park maintenance more difficult. The group generally favored nature play. One participant voiced a preference for play elements with a rustic look. Another felt the vertical logs were reminiscent of cut trees. Concerns were raised about the longevity of wood structures, such as the log pile, with natural material breaking down over time. Swings and rocks with engraved animal characters were supported. Both nature play and traditional play structures were acceptable. Rock features were favored. Trails There was support for the trail network on the site and for the proposed boardwalk and forested wetland overlook which provides views into the wetland while protecting habitat. It was suggested that the proposed 6-foot sidewalk/community trail along the SW Tigard Street be widened to 8 feet to better serve as a community trail. Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 2 May 18,2012 Summer Creek Property Master Plan Public Meeting No.2 Notes City of Tigard-Public Works Department Parks Division Restoration and Mitigation Restoration efforts will be focused on the Oak Savanna area in the north and west part of the site, as it includes many slow-growing species. Restoration east of the Fanno Creek Trail is not included in the master plan. Protection of the wetland mitigation area near the ballfield was discussed. Fencing was discussed as was using signing and education in lieu of fencing. Water Quality Sampling Area The need to improve the water quality testing area was mentioned as an important component to support environmental education. Phased Development It was suggested that construction be phased such that heavy construction is completed early in the phasing to avoid impacts to restored areas of the site. END Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. 3 May 18,2012 Estimate of probable Construction Costs -- Master Plan June 30,2012 Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Cost Cost Plus 20% Mobilization Mobilization (7%of Construction Cost) 1 LS $30,119.00 $30,119 $36,143 Subtotal: $30,119 $36,143 Construction Survey&Staking 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 $12,000 Subtotal: $10,000 $12,000 Clearing&Grubbing Clearing &Grubbing 43,970 SF $0.25 $10,993 $13,191 Misc.Tree Removal 10 EA $400.00 $4,000 $4,800 $14,993 $17,991 Porta-potty Concrete Pad (for unisex accessable porta-potty) 300 SF $5.00 $1,500 $1,800 Screening (for porta-potty) 65 LF $45.00 $2,925 $3,510 $4,425 $5,310 Restrooms/Interpretive Shelter Water Meter 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 $6,000 Water Line-3/4 inch 500 LF $25.00 $12,500 $15,000 Sanitary Line-4 inch 500 LF $35.00 $17,500 $21,000 Electric Connection(for restroom) 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 $12,000 Restroom/Interpretive Shelter(4 seats) 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000 $96,000 $125,000 $150,000 Site Furnishings Bench (6 foot) 7 EA $1,800.00 $12,600 $15,120 Picnic Table 6 EA $4,000.00 $24,000 $28,800 Litter Receptacle 6 EA $1,500.00 $9,000 $10,800 Entry Signage 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000 $18,000 Interpretive Signage 10 EA $6,000.00 $60,000 $72,000 Bollards 2 EA $500.00 $1,000 $1,200 Loop Bike Rack 4 EA $500.00 $2,000 $2,400 $123,600 $148,320 Nature Play Areas Toddler Area(at parking lot) 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000 $48,000 Age 5-12 Area(at playing field) 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 $60,000 $90,000 $108,000 Playing Fields Soccer Field (Partial Overlay) 1 LS $70,000.00 $70,000 $84,000 Baseball Field Improvements 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000 $108,000 Baseball Field Backstop Removal (2) 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 $6,000 $165,000 $198,000 Boardwalks Boardwalk(Fanno Creek Trail) 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 $180,000 Handrail for Fanno Creek Boardwalk 800 LF $115.00 $92,000 $110,400 Boardwalk(Soft Surface Trails) 1,200 SF $118.00 $141,600 $169,920 Water Quality Sampleling Improvements 1 LS $14,000.00 $14,000 $16,800 $397,600 $477,120 Parking Lot Driveway Apron 2 EA $1,500.00 $3,000 $3,600 Asphalt Paving (with base) 10,500 SF $6.00 $63,000 $75,600 Parking Lot Signage 4 EA $500.00 $2,000 $2,400 Concrete Wheel Stops 12 EA $100.00 $1,200 $1,440 Striping 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 $3,000 $71,700 $86,040 Concrete Abutments 6 EA $400.00 $2,400 $2,880 $2,400 $2,880 Summer Creek MP-Cost Estimate.xls/Master Plan 6-30-2012 VIGIL-AGRIMIS, INC Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Cost Cost Plus 20% Trails Paved (8-foot asphalt-Maintenance Access) 4,160 SF $6.00 $24,960 $29,952 Paved (8-foot asphalt-Community Trail) 11,600 SF $6.00 $69,600 $83,520 Paved (6-foot concrete-Sidewalk) 5,000 SF $5.00 $25,000 $30,000 Soft Surface(5-foot chip-SW Tigard St to Fields) 520 LF $3.00 $1,560 $1,872 Soft Surface(5-foot chip-Around Fields) 1,140 LF $3.00 $3,420 $4,104 Soft Surface(5-foot chip-Southwest) 2,130 LF $3.00 $6,390 $7,668 Soft Surface(3-foot chip-North) 660 LF $2.00 $1,320 $1,584 Soft Surface(3-foot chip-Southwest) 1,230 LF $2.00 $2,460 $2,952 $134,710 $161,652 Half Street Improvememts Half Street Improvements 1 LS $472,000.00 $472,000 $566,400 $472,000 $566,400 Education Center Improvements Paint 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 $18,000 Deck 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 $18,000 Screening Vegetation &Fence 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 $30,000 Community Garden 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000 $36,000 Overflow Parking 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 $18,000 $100,000 $120,000 Permanent Fencing Split Rail Fence 350 LF $40.00 $14,000 $16,800 $14,000 $16,800 Erosion &Sediment Controls Erosion&Sediment Controls 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 $30,000 $25,000 $30,000 Planting Required Screening&Trees(new lot) 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 $30,000 Replanting (baseball field) 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000 $48,000 Wetland&Buffer Mitigation 1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000 $72,000 $125,000 $150,000 Miscellaneous Parking Lot Lighting (2 lights) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 $18,000 $15,000 $18,000 Subtotal: $1,880,428 $2,256,513 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,920,547 $2,304,656 OVERHEAD AND PROFFIT(7%) $134,438 $161,326 BONDING AND INSURANCE(2%) $38,411 $46,093 TOTAL $2,093,396 $2,512,075 DESIGN SERVICES(10%) $209,340 $251,207 PERMITTING SERVICES(4%) $83,736 $100,483 INFLATION (3%) $62,802 $75,362 (assume summer 2013 construction) GRAND TOTAL $2,449,273 $2,939,128 Summer Creek MP-Cost Estimate.xls/Master Plan 6-30-2012 VIGIL-AGRIMIS, INC CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 14- � 1 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A METRO NATURE IN NEIGHBORHOODS CAPITAL GRANT TO FUND DE'V'ELOPMENT OF DIRKSEN NATURE PARI{ WHEREAS, the 2009 Park System Master Plan identified the properties—now known as Dirksen Nature Park---as a future community park;and WHEREAS,the citizens of Tigard supported the acquisition and development of parks through passage of the $17 million park and open space bond measure in 2010;and WHEREAS,the city, using funds from the 2010 park and open space bond measure,was able to purchase the properties that now form Dirksen Nature Park;and WHEREAS,the development of the park is planned in four phases;and V714EREAS, the city has not identified funding for phases 3 and 4 which includes construction of two nature play areas,trails and boardwalks,and restoration of the oak savanna at the northern section of the park;and WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Advisory Board and City Council have asked staff to seek additional funding to augment the park bond funds; and WHEREAS,Dietro has invited Tigard to submit a Nature in Neighborhoods grant application for phases 3 and 4 of the park developments and WHEREAS, if the grant is awarded, the city would be able to complete the development of Dirksen Nature Park. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard Cit).Council that: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council supports the submission of an application for a Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grant to partially fund the development of Dirksen Nature Park. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This ' day of 014. I, ATTEST: Mayor-City of Tigard try Recorder- City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 14-(,} Page 1 Contract 932931 Attachment 2A of City of Tigard Memorandum To: Diary Rose Navarro From: Jeff Peck Re: Dirksen Nature Park - Park Element Descriptions & Costing Date: September 30, 2015 Mary Rose, The City is proposing a change to the Dirksen Nature Park scope of work and funding. Two master plan exhibits highlighting park elements to be constructed are attached for reference. One exhibit shows proposed park elements, and the second exhibit captures city and Metro funding of park elements. We were not able to secure funding for the proposed restroom/interpretive shelter and associated utilities. As a result, the facility is being removed from our scope of work. To meet our financial match we have added the Fanno Creek wetland boardwalk, complete restoration of the Oak Savanna, and support funding for the nature play area and the Oak Savanna overlook. Renovations to the Environmental Education building, parking t—ri-4 *��s4 A� fLa will remain the same. Metro funding will no longer pay for the Oak Savanna Restoration. Metro urill continue to fund the forested wetland boardwalk and restoration area, nature play area, and the oak savanna overlook. The City is requesting Metro to partially fund the Fanno Creek boardwalk. Park Elements & Funding: Oak Savanna Restoration Oak Savanna restoration was previously shown as a Metro grant obligation with minor financial contribution from the city. Since then, we have determined the restoration can be fully funded by one of our revenue programs. As a result, we have entered into a contract a th Ash Creek Forest Management, LLC to restore the oak savanna. The city and Ash Creek are participating in cooperative agreement pricing established in Metro RFP-2788 Natural Areas Habitat Restoration The general scope of the work as follows: • Removal of trees that are currently crowding the areas oak trees • Replanting of native grasses,wildflowers, and shrubs associated with a healthy oak savanna. • Maintenance services for the areas through 2019. The projected cost for the oak savanna restoration is $272,000. This estimate included the contract price, contingency, shrub and tree plantings, and irrigation as needed. Oak Savanna Overlook The city anticipates receiving money to expand upon the Oak Savanna Overlook. The funding ($33,000) will pay for interpretive/educational features to be in-laid into the overlook. Wetland Boardwalks The city is proposing to add the Fanno Creek-wetland boardwalk to the project and $67,300 in support funding. Metro funding will also be used to cover funding of the added boardwalk. Drawings of each boardwalk are included for reference. Nature Play Area The city is proposing to add funding to the Nature Play park elements. Estimated support funding in the amount of$89,720 will be used to pay for playground equipment. Drawings of the nature play area are included for reference. In summary,we have made minor changes to the Nature in Neighborhoods grant request, and we ask for your consideration and approval of the changes. We look forward to your continued support. Thank you. c °' Sa CL 'Lou CL a.+ dfy � '•,; �'da CJ 4-1 a •9LA " P_ cn � UZ .ae'` � m ` 40 a P '= a C o i € Q: ca _.._ Q� W c. vi 4 «J ~ c _ Lu CL W C Ac o x o p C � MOM LLJ anuaav aupg Mc 1 v Ln :i—tA,41 7ow 1� - I qp c-, t--jry -- � . tg a c o t-•4r, .far`..: -'11'Rw"j 0 3: d 'a W m 4-0 Q I [j `'' C to W CL ( -�c a cr �° s• c _ ® G GJ J _ � G. 4 � LLJ y Lu Q d O b eUjC to ■ w 4.0 ' cu J 4c p O EV Ca +� anuaav nlle9 MS �+ 11 JO Al IV'3SVHd-mva mniVN Nn IC OW0 2ULFURAk 01*0 NV'1d 3.11S rT ——————— RAI ia z z 4 RIO �Mi IT fill, AND oil. R'4 Ll 10 C4 13 HO 13W 338 IMIHOLLYed Z .,:., NNANS SY LMS•�i.fi«�.�u o.r� w.��aww, �{ A�1M+ 1135YNd•NWd�31'Y11R•!iijS]R}la E% NYM MIS ll ki I � I -1 r Wiley � II s � 1 I,P all r I f I r Q I t � a J 1 l r � 1 Sir �� xs casaaa ■ r�jr I o9 +� S Tt Cn C E C R Rr F fi!Me R 5 low 4 Y�sj L'J % Gras "se A a m a z a fen ■■ �Z— Wru as ess-irc��+'y�_�u�.el Fwd n� �tiwna[�n�ia4�i ivel _ CI'.t IOdH'JSi�an.w MS RVA!` _ a 1138Y1d•NHd lYN SI 1� WYOU 50 pis 'dIvN ) F�AmoNV"Id 095VN-i IMH M33�0 ONW4 Y — f a d HAII {$ € �rr 1 000 oC�b 13 moo° � �n��$�� ?st$�r�� Y � I � m x 6 1 l- au se 7 . 0 Y fg 4 Q $PY � Jill � S 1 J 1133MN9-XWVO 311aa11v"BiN�aoS)�MO j Wr tlaa AdId 3kn1aNJy�Cdu U 511v130 htlld 2Un1aN I 4H '20 o_ "1st ` eY ya e Y w m gh5p.x IT g e .11 IN V.R p 3g {` a+ a99 �a 114 $ ,. NOR �x a I3 �� e. SS � � 3�d gb6sq r� If 88 d ee t6r rV � 3e + > AIV GO{` T f�r.v ury awrrm trot fn sf�+�M1t��vcwrsa�C�tpe autr�iit I^'v^a eY Iti s�ei eeztve vi� y7,] 113SWd-NNVS=N01VN NgVx10 Q a:m�at ao Aai:) i SIlVJ.3G'AOO1H3AO GNV_U3M INISAHOA i 1 r � 1 1 f ti U ri Ifi 3: It �q�w w CL cr 1 P --_ IN, i Elow �6.3` is N'9ei7 $ !l!ea i!$I! $ l..1.. $fir$ '. H , !r � � �� t �ii1 y _ ! 4! b..�.. - �i.»�.•��ri�,i M..M. 9"!;`p=�,"d.Erol -- zio-asisdv__._ Msis000e aaw - 13SVHd-MdWd 3HnlvN PsdSNtllq aaa�ufaura 511t+13a]i001�3�4 Ohit1�13M g f I i l 9 I w In 5 _ i g �5 w I O 0o p d 4 M cc U . n f''ell ozza lw I J� i .i I �9 .,.��„a”.=..,arc.��.�,�•,-F.:.v,:'i'u:.'o..,..�«�""."Qmi` �'°`,.1'��.,ti1�,.ol ami o L �� 0O E (6 O (6 O 7 0 LO Y =° N a) c to .-.. y +� O E fo (n L (L6 0 0 C N O Q W W .N _ � 6)O E U m m 3 rn E ° M O Q Q m d a) ° LO I-_ U) m C7 O C9 a ° Ec ° > aXi g o g c°i c`o cn ° Xq EU — ° -J U Cl) cn -0m U) 4i O O Q O W W L co �n cn CO N � Y y m cZ m co° ° to W y W O a) L L O O Q W Q W ° ° a) .D a) O N °a >, ° rn fn° W U co to M E Q ° ° co -070 - c cn Q 0) Q (3) t� U O Q cn s= Q Q -0 W W W LU to to c , , c Oa ~ Oa � Q-c ° O > H H E zcn U zcn U . °U ° . 5 —cc: U) 3 U CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o O O O 000000000 o t\i o rl- o 000 K3 00 1 f H3 UR O O O O LO O O N O O O Q J O O O O O O J a0 O N O N Q L O d• O tD to N Q O It It O LO 0 — M ~ — V) N O r-- toH M ti I,- — (0 It 6q EP Q N U!.* N N V> N to e4 Vs �FA 5 ~ Q4 6q ER FA m U N co O O O O O O O O O d O O d O O O O U a E!) ER CD CD CD CD Q U ZS O O O C/) i .- ti O M Q) C ff} Efl Rzi y (� ` EF? 60- z Q = H O O O W V O O +O' O O Q = O O O O H cn -a O O = -a N O FL Y c rl- � v o G Q V3- 66- 0 gO Y 2 cn c m c a0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o 0 O W u 0 0 0 0 0 (3) u o O O O O O O O C9 �' O O O O O tU U N O r- O O O O = Q O O O O O z LO O O N O V=? O D E cc O O O Z3 E 00 O O r- co N Q mLO O It O to _ 0 C6 N vi to r� m f0 � LO N O 00 U co ti co 00 CO 6q .O 6q E!} e=} T" u N 61, 60- Gq 0 W «s w c 4 c z Z a o W M O O WW "W 'Z� N 06 Q Cl) � � z O � a� o U io U) to Wm cn ° °' o g o 0 (nH in 0 J w E 'N z o yLU 0 W O a) tL M c Q a a v ' ayi O o ami3 c c Q m ° U) ZO °' c o ~ " " E 0 - c°o t°a co a� Q U N � m E n3 > > d En -0 Mn d) ZQU > inZQU > a W o ° cq cn OY W L ° 1 a) N L to cn t! ' Q. LL n N M n N M .4 "' C) (o ' to > to c6 N C L a) O Q m $ z I aW c O O zUi NU c HUe ma W U c, cei 4 � tor- = 2 '§ W § = k s \ � \ / § \ � \ _ \ \ 3 \ co � \ cu E \ � « § \p E /\ � \ -E @ E m E U) k o 2 % o \ 2 0 ± 5 m > 0 5 / g / > 0 0 0 0 0000000 00 0 000 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0000000 og o CD CD o m 6 6 6 a 6 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 ® 6 6 6 ® a = 2 / / / 2 � mmmmmmm m m mm / G & LO « o § n 6q7 O m ° / � . (D 2 § S 2 $ 8 \ \ \ CD o d c CL m CD $ 60- / oCL m m k \ ® 2 f 0 km _ / / k \ = 8 8 / k 6 6 a £ ° CD CD 6 = 2 0 0 0 = « tq 60 o = 0 0 0 > E o 2 K ƒ 7 / ' 2 o &60 C > / k / / / S / \ $ 8 / § Cl p > g \ CD ea \ \ ƒ k 0') § q CN 692 \ \ 7 \ r a Co \ _ » (D 0 \ - \ \ / \ k 2 $ o E O e c E 2 \ ƒ 2J 5 _ E / ƒ k / 2 \ _ § _ \ - \ § Q « _ = m = > / o k m o s e n e m E 0 2 6 # m c = O 2 Q m o 2 o CO o E .- n « o _ ° U m ® � { o ± \ 5 \ \ m _ § \ « § w Lu 2 J f \ o a e m y = / 2 ) E E 2 § F Q U r 2 + U o © f ® � e 2 e £ m e \ 3 w � o = 2 2 e .E q t 3 - o o = e = e =_ — / \ § 0 \ 2 = a _ o 7 E 2 m m 3 [ O O t a ± = m O . « 1 3 3 0 — 2 0 = k o e < R 2 = a — \ n = _ - c.g = a ® ƒ k k / \ ® ® � j E \ k ƒ \ \ k w 2 m = a c k/ f e n — w@ > $ « 0 n w 0 / o $ E O O < G 12 5 12 = R § _ ® a a m 0 < r % a d 6 6 2 d ¥ O % \ 5 ± CO