The URL can be used to link to this page

CCDA Packet - 12/01/2015 m a CODA CITY OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 NOTICE OF TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) MEETING CCDA BUSINESS MEETING Town Hall • 6:30 pm • Public Welcome Forwarded to: ❑ Dana Tims, The Oregonian (dtims@oregonian.com) ❑ Editor, The Regal Courier (Editor@theregalcourier.com) ❑ Geoff Pursinger, Tigard Times (gpursinger@commnewspapers.com) The CCDA was reactivated by Resolution 05-32 on May 10, 2005, and will meet occasionally to address issues related to urban renewal. The CCDA,functioning as the city's urban renewal agency,will work on an urban renewal plan designed to facilitate the development and redevelopment of downtown Tigard and possibly other areas within the city. For further information, please contact Deputy City Recorder Norma Alley by calling (503) 718-2410 or by email at norma@tigard-or.gov. Norma I. Alley Deputy City Recorder November 25, 2015 Post: Tigard City Hall Tigard Permit Center Tigard Public Library City f Tigard City Center Development Agency Board - Agenda TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 1, 2015 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for City Center Development Agency Board meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the City Center Development Agency Board meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deao. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deao. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA City f Tigard City Center Development Agency Board - Agenda TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 1, 2015 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING A. Call to Order- City Center Development Agency B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Board and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. UPDATE ON THE FUTURE OF THE SAXONY SITE - 6:35 p.m. estimated time 3. UPDATE ON THE DOWNTOWN PARKING - 7:00 p.m. estimated time 4. UPDATE ON THE BROWNFIELD INITIATIVE - 7:25 p.m. estimated time 5. CONSIDER APPROVING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN EPA BROWNFIELD CLEANUP GRANT APPLICATION - 7:45 p.m. estimated time 6. ANNUAL REPORT ON THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT - 7:55 p.m. estimated time 7. NON AGENDA ITEMS S. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Center Development Agency Board may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT AIS-2127 2. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 12/01/2015 Length (in minutes): 25 Minutes Agenda Title: Future of Saxony Site - Update Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Future of Saxony Site - Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Board of the CCDA is requested to share their opinions and ideas on the design plans. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The city has engaged Resolve Architecture and Planning to prepare the Saxony site for development over the next twelve months. Their scope of work includes site and building design, economic feasibility, taking the design through land use approval, and public involvement. The first phase of the project will be to determine what type of development can be built on the site. The site has constraints in that all of the property is in the 100-year floodplain, with portions in the floodway and vegetated corridor. Resolve Architecture, working with staff, will determine what can be built within the limitations of Clean Water Services (CWS), Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA), Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of State Lands, and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) regulations and those of the Tigard Development Code. Resolve has studied the site and worked through a number of designs. On November 16, city staff and consultants met with staff from Clean Water Services to collaborate on a design for the potential public space. Resolve will revise their plans to reflect the direction of the discussion, likely a smaller public space to limit encroachment into the Fanno Creek vegetated corridor. At the December 1st CCDA meeting staff will present the latest design concepts and discuss issues related to site redevelopment. OTHER ALTERNATIVES No alternatives for consideration at this time. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard City Council 2015-17 Goals and Milestones Goal #2. Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be City Center Urban Renewal Plan Goal 1: Revitalization of the Downtown should recognize the value of natural resources as amenities and as contributing to the special sense of place. Goal 5: Promote high quality development of retail, office and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape, transportation, recreation and open space investments. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Special Planning Areas- Downtown Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village. Tigard Strategic Plan Goal 2: Ensure development advances the vision DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION August 18, 2015: Discussion on Saxony Property Redevelopment Study May 26, 2015, Authorize Purchase of Saxony Pacific Site May 5, 2015, Discussion of Prospective Purchaser Agreement April 8, 2014, Authorize CCDA Executive Director to negotiate voluntary property acquisitions The purchase of the Saxony property was discussed in a number of Executive Sessions including: 2014: December 2, October 28, September 2,January 7 2013: December 3, November 5, October 1, September 3, August 20 Attachments No file(s) attached �ry G f' o,R d r �j fr c / m�mV / qI oio 0 a V�IIIIII me, s.✓s a .„.. li............ 7 z 4i Ck� TI 07. ........... 2 C n C-D t - n, 73 .10 (ILI 3i L 31 1�4 U., I ............ E ............. ............ ....... X ............... < z a. ��aam»uouuuuuiu ,��a�pq�llaa¶Illlllllllllli ��Ilmo .�.F Allw I�UIIUI� a4 �I�iX S . mumouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu III i) � i �wluuuuuoi �Uthoumumiomu�� um �•� IIIA IIIA �� a,,...... IIIA C:Ln R�m�mmR aU„�h u�ua qq �9umumououp� '°” Cu mulRd �i�INuuuuuuuuumu E uaagl �ouuuum��uuumuuum 'N..... ��dU oPf�'ll� 4—J of RI� ... RI. Sa hi a� 91 HH III co ... u.................. 1,.i H, WO 76 PP IL':::: wnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn M U�q� wnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnn w„"' .27� Cl W w >� a O 1 \ u'o n U) LU X �� - '\ C1.7 � a LU U) C3 ...Nh x W Q W �. W J 'L........... a- � (55 o ; r / '� by��, ' ,� � ✓ ✓ � �"� V....IIIIII ` m C) mo �. - �. CL tz w ' ca `, �/ /' / UJ o — �� LU / m � W' v LU a c) U) li .. r as %i (D i, 17 j ` Cl LII U rte? OL x � as I / uuuuuuuuu � / i 6 'h � i�uuuuum°uuum � I i d t �� (.D 1. I� e r , �� > f/' tzl " a �`t � Am� � �" ' �////�"ofl%�r rim / ��,9r✓� /� �- — im � ��U o IV yI h Nip, r�� v � 1 iio r i ii 7 ' � vkl �� ,.,. �wJ � w, r,, �a��/ � ,t,,m ', v � W � �/j////w �% l�v r ) t�;��/"dirMYP rr��a, yy •I tZ 1 l/D444 4 kM w µ ,�" i o I yy t3�1Y1) lll O ? d vwk' �, ? µ rS ' ' y"• wµ �.„r.... P��' e1°4 III" )��"'`,Mw„F"� �`e, ^�' ; � a � r "1y u .r t {' �� '4mH � ,�o- r�. C ? � a „ , vl 214 WAU TI A, Ne OF/ s I r a.. (F A D /, OL x �� w , 4 u r iJet 4,I t F I � a�° C AIS-2393 3. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 12/01/2015 Length (in minutes): 25 Minutes Agenda Title: Update on Downtown Parking Prepared For: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Submitted By: Norma Alley, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Downtown Parking Plan Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Board is requested to provide feedback on the downtown parking management work to date. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY While the city has only a small piece of the Downtown parking supply (126 on-street spaces and 35 spaces in two public parking lots versus 877 private off-street parking spaces), staff recognizes the importance of parking management for an economically healthy downtown. Data collectors from Rick Williams Consulting completed a downtown parking inventory on Thursday,June 4, 2015. A supplemental survey on Burnham Street was completed on Wednesday,July 8, 2015. They surveyed on and off street parking in the survey area and compiled a report detailing the results. Key data: On-street parking utilization Tigard's downtown on-street supply totals just 126 stalls. At the peak hour (noon — 1:00 PM) 65.1% of these stalls are occupied, leaving 44 stalls empty and available. Parking turnover is healthy: stays in 2-Hour stalls average 1 hour and 50 minutes; average stays in "No Limit" on-street stalls are 2 hours and 24 minutes. Time stay violations are high by industry standards (10.7%). 13 of the 18 vehicles exceeding the 2-Hour time stay limit in on-street stalls were parked for 5 or more hours. In the smaller "nodal area" south of the railroad tracks (38 stalls), occupancies are much higher, reaching a constrained level of 89.5% in the peak hour. However, occupancies drop to unconstrained levels in all succeeding hours. Off-street parking utilization Overall, the off-street supply is underutilized. Peak hour occupancy for the off-street supply reaches 53.4% between noon and 1:00 PM. At the peak hour, there are 404 empty off-street stalls in the study zone. Burnham Street lot: Most of the cars parked in the city's Burnham lot are likely employees as their cars were observed in the stall or lot over several hours. 2010 survey versus 2015 Overall use of downtown's on and off-street systems has grown between 2010 and 2015. The growth in the on- and off-street system, for all stalls is 10.1 and 12.4 percentage points respectively. Consultant's Report Recommendations: 1. The findings of the report indicate that some level of parking enforcement is needed in the public Burnham lot as the majority of the spaces in the lot are occupied by the same cars for several hours of the day. 2. The report notes that the current parking supply is adequate for the volume of cars visiting downtown; however, efforts to increase the use of private lots (for short or long-term parking) should be considered, through shared parking agreements. 3. The current mix of 2 hour and no limit stalls along Burnham Street should be reviewed in light of the new Ash/Burnham apartment building being built. The TDA Parking subcommittee reviewed the report and gave comments on its contents. Staff will continue to work with the subcommittee and TDA members to address downtown parking needs. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The CCDA Board could direct staff to investigate additional parking management policies. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard Cit,: Council 2015-17 Goals and Milestones Goal #2. Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be Cit: Center Urban Renewal Plan Project F.2. Public Parking Facilities Tigard Comprehensive Plan Downtown Goal 15.4 Develop comprehensive street and circulation improvements for pedestrians, automobiles, bicycles, and transit. Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan Main Street and Burnham Street Design Plans DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Downtown Parking Updates: June 2, 2015 December 2, 2014 December 3, 2013 Attachments Parking Technical Memo RICK WILLIAMS, CONSULTING Pay. kiing & 'I`" rainslinou•t::1tic) i,i PO Box 12546 Portland,OR 97212 Phone:(503)459-7638 E-mail: rick@rickwilliamsconsulting.com MEMORANDUM TO: Sean Farrelly, City of Tigard FROM: Rick Williams, RWC Owen Ronchelli, RWC Pete Collins, RWC DATE: August 7, 2015, 2015 (3) RE: Technical Memorandum: Downtown Tigard Parking Occupancy/Utilization Study This Technical Memorandum summarizes the findings of the Downtown Parking Occupancy/Utilization Study, which evaluated parking activity in the on and off-street supply in downtown Tigard, Oregon. I. BACKGROUND The City of Tigard is interested in developing a clear and objective understanding of the dynamics of use within the downtown parking supply. Usage data related to occupancy,turnover, duration of stay and hourly patterns of activity are examples of industry"best practices" metrics used for evaluating municipal parking systems, both on and off-street. This type of data can assist the City in near-term decision-making relative to existing parking supplies; as a means to understand where parking constraints and surpluses exist, and whether factors such as abuse of time limits is an issue that might adversely affect access. Similarly, this type of data will aid in longer-term city planning efforts to meeting future parking needs related to growth and development in the downtown; providing insight into such issues such as shared parking opportunities and/or future absorption related to planned and future development. II. ELEMENTS OF THE PARKING INVENTORY ANALYSIS The purpose of a parking utilization study is to derive a comprehensive and detailed understanding of actual use dynamics and access characteristics associated with parking in the downtown. Important elements of the analysis include: (1) Development of a data template for all parking in the study area, denoting all parking stalls, by time stay type, for on and off-street facilities. (2) A complete survey of parking use on a "typical day" --a single Thursday on June 4, 2015.1 (3) Analysis of parking utilization and turnover that included: 1 This date was chosen in consultation with the City of Tigard. a. Quantification of total study area parking inventory. b. Hourly occupancy counts (9 AM—7 PM)for on and off-street inventory. c. Parking turnover analysis (on-street). d. Parking duration of stay analysis (on-street). (4) Identification of parking surpluses and constraints in the parking supply. In short, the purpose of the parking utilization study was to produce a succinct analysis of existing parking dynamics in downtown Tigard that can be employed over time to support and inform decision- making related to development and parking.' III. STUDY AREA The parking inventory study area was determined in the initial project scoping process and in consultation with the City of Tigard.The study zone represents the City's definition of the "downtown" and areas immediately adjacent that can serve as parking resources to the downtown. The limits of the study area includes SW Main Street from the intersection SW Pacific Hwy/SW Johnson Street to SW Pacific Hwy/SW Greenburg Road and includes up to 300 feet along the side streets.The study area includes on-street parking within the public right-of-way, off-street parking for properties that front SW Main Street, and the TriMet park and ride lot at the Tigard Transit Center. Figure A (page 3) illustrates the study area examined during the data collection process; the boundary is outlined in purple. IV. METHODOLOGY Rick Williams Consulting (RWC) conducted the capacity/utilization and turnover study for the on and off- street supply on Thursday,June 4, 2015.The survey day was selected in consultation with the City of Tigard and was reflective of the initial scoping process. Overall, the survey day was sunny and warm/hot (low 80s)with moderate to strong parking activity in all sectors of the downtown. The consultant team was able to inventory all on and off-street parking in the study zone. In total,there are 1,003 stalls within the study area. Our approach for each type of supply(on and off-street) is described below. 'Copies of all data templates will be provided to the City of Tigard for future use. The data templates incorporate hourly parking counts for every stall, by block face and public lot, in the study area. 2 Figure A Downtown Parking Study Area r v � V I I�,!�Ullllllliai,o 'n r n 1 ° � /r ;'%�� of /� ✓,'�' 1 a` Juane 2015 Stau+�y Area Bouiirnrtlary Tigard,Oregon Downtown 5$dPdy,4feCP Off-Street-(XX)Lot Stall Total r sr 190 M 170 -18D Oin-Street-XX Bllockfface Stall Total RICK WILLIAMS CONSULTING P"trIcliritg Sx 'Tr-,a.nvspr:.rii-ra,'tnon A. On-Street Supply The project team's methodological approach to gathering parking utilization/capacity/turnover data began with a physical compilation of all public on-street parking assets within the study area. This assessment was primarily facilitated through the City's provision of a detailed inventory map of the study area.All on-street stalls were identified by type of stall (i.e., time or use restriction), block number and block face. This information was used to create a data template necessary to conduct the capacity/utilization assessment. In total 126 on-street parking stalls are located within the study zone. A breakout of the on-street inventory is provided in Table 1 (page 4). The surveys involved hourly counts of each occupied on-street parking stall in the study area, recording the vehicle's license plate. Surveyors collected license plate data at each on-street parking stall located in the study area for every hour over a ten-hour period (9:00 AM—7:00 PM). All 126 on-street stalls were surveyed, representing a 100%sample size for the on-street inventory. 3 B. Off-street Supply As with the on-street system, a data collection template was developed for each off-street facility in advance of the June 4, 2015 survey day.The inventory of off-street stalls, both public and private,was categorized by block number and identified by tenant/operator. As Figure A above indicates, each off- street site is assigned a unique number. A total of 877 off-street stalls were documented in 38 off-street surface lots. Table 2 (page 5) provides a combined summary of the off-street supply. On the survey day all stalls in the off-street supply were physically surveyed in each of the 38 facilities. As with the on-street system, this represents a 100%sample size of off-street stalls. Similar to the on- street study, each lot was surveyed for occupancy every hour between 9:00 AM—7:00 PM. In all, a combined on/off-street sample size of 100%was completed,which provides an accurate and comprehensive picture for measuring the operation, performance and activity associated with parking in this area of Tigard. V. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INVENTORY-STUDY AREA A. Inventory: On-street parking A total of 126 on-street parking stalls were surveyed within the study area boundaries. Parking in the public supply is provided in the form of free parking. Table 1 presents a breakout of all the on-street parking surveyed in the Downtown Study Zone. As indicated the majority of on- street stalls (73%or 92 spaces) are 2-Hour time limited stalls.The remainder is formatted as No Limit stalls (25%or 32 stalls) or 15-Minute parking (1.6%or 2 stalls). In general, the number of on-street stalls downtown (126) is a small and finite supply. The high mix of 2-Hour parking is conducive to customer access and turnover. Nonetheless, the majority of parking in the overall supply is off-street (877 stalls); with on-street representing just 12.6% of the total supply of parking downtown. Table 1 2015 Downtown Parking Inventory: On-street NEEMENINIM om2 1.6% 92 73.0%32 25.4% In 126 100.0 4 B. Inventory: Off-street parking A total of 877 off-street parking stalls were surveyed on 38 lots within the study area boundaries. Parking in the off-street supply is provided in the form of free parking. Only two facilities (Lots 7 and 24) are time limited. Table 2 presents a breakout of all the off-street parking surveyed in the Downtown Study Zone. Lot sizes ranged from as low as 5 stalls (e.g., Lots 8 and 15)to a high of 103 (Lot 28—TriMet Park and Ride). Table 2 2015 Parking Inventory: Off-street OZONE EENE M, --M. 1 Tigard Cleaners 9 1.0% 2 Car Quest 6 0.7% 3 Smoke Shop/12215 SW Iain 16 1.8/ 4 Main Street Stamp&Stationery 12 1.4% 5 State Farre Insurance,Orient Pearl, PC Repair 26 3.0/ 6 Private Parking 9 1.0% 7 Symposium/Public Loi:(2 HR harking) 15 1.7/ 8 Attorney Office 5 0.6% 9 Tigard Chiropractic 9 1.0% 10 Sherrie's Jewelry Box 6 0.7% 11 Office; 9 1.0% 12 Tyler's Automotive/Kiss Car Wash 16 1.8% 13 Parking behind Tigard Cleaners/Keppler's 14 1.6% 14 Oregon Drive Axle 12 1.4% 15 Aves Laboratory 5 0.6% 16 Wei Li Acupuncture Clinic 11 1.3% 17 Karate on Main(Front lot) 5 0.6% 18 12564 SW Main/Diamond(Back lot) 7 0.8% 19 12564 SW Main/Diamond Gravel Lot 36 4.1% 20 Max's Fanno Creek Brew Pub 9 1.0% 21 Pacific Paint Supply/Fish Field 67 7.6% 22 Tigard Liquor Store 18 2.1% 23/24 2 HR. Public Parking 202.3% 5 „,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,............................ 25 Computer Skills/Salon 7 0.8% 26 Cafe Allegro 20 2.3% 27 Tigardville Station Pub&Grill 7 0.8% 28 TriMet Park and(tide: 103, 113% 29 Barber Shop 6 0.7% 30 12260 SW Main-vacant(former Frame Central) 16 1.8% 31 Transit Center TriMet Building 5 0.6% 32 Crown Carpet/Live Laugh Love Class 39 4.4% 33 Post Office 24 2.7% 34 Bead Bullies/LaFuente 39 ” 4.4% 35 U.S. Bank 25 2.9% 36 McDona lds 8 6.9% 37 Rite Aid 129 14.7% 38 Value Village 10712.2% rr r° VI. FINDINGS A. Hourly and Peak Occupancy: On-street The peak hour for the on-street public inventory is between noon and 1:00 PM. At this hour, 65.1%of the 126 parking stalls in the study area are occupied. Table 3 (page 7)summarizes occupancies by hour of day and parked vehicles versus empty spaces. Figure B (page 7) illustrates public and private occupancies for each hour of the ten-hour survey day. A "heat map"of the peak hour(for on and off-street parking)is provided in Attachment at the end of this document. The heat map displays occupancy using color to provide a visual illustration of how the combined occupancy of a parking system is distributed by on-street block face (and by lot for off-street supply).' Heat maps for each hour surveyed are available from the City of Tigard. 3Red indicates constrained parking with orange,yellow and green indicating, in descending order, lower levels of parking use. Heat maps for each hour of the survey day are available from the City of Tigard. 6 Table 3 On-Street: Occupancy by Hour of Day-Vehicles Parked versus Empty Stalls On-Street MIS= Vehicles 36 42 43 82 53 51 52 57 53 42 Parked Percentage 28.6% 33.3% 34.1% 65.1% 42.1% 40.5% 41.3% 45.2% 42.1% 33.3% Occupied Empty Stalls 90 84 83 44 73 75 74 69 73 84 As the table and figure illustrate,there is a surplus of on-street parking empty and available throughout the day. At the peak hour (noon— 1:00 PM) 82 vehicles are parked on-street, leaving 44 stalls unoccupied. Also, the peak hour is a very prominent and short lived spike lasting an hour. Occupancies in the hour preceding and following the peak are just 34.1% and 42.1%, respectively. All hours following the peak never exceed 46%. Occupancies drop again between 6:00 PM and 7:00 PM to 33.3%. Given this pattern, it is unlikely that patrons or employees accessing the downtown cannot find an on-street stall conveniently and within reasonable proximity to their destinations for most hours of the day. Figure B Tigard: Summary of Hourly Utilization On-Street(12+6 stalls) 70% 65.1% 60% 50% 45.2% 42.1% 40.5% 41.3% 42.1% 40% ° 34.1°� 33.3,E 33.3% 30% 28.6% 20% 10% 0° 9:30 AM 10:30 AM11:30 AM12:30 PM 1:30 PM 2:30 PM 3:30 PM 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 6:30 PM 7 B. On-street: General Characteristics of Use Because data was assembled through hourly recording of license plates (i.e., unique vehicle) a number of informative use metrics can be derived. Table 4 summarizes those metrics. The table is followed by a summary of several of the more important use factors. Table 4 General Characteristics of Use—On-Street Parking Stalls r All Stall Types 2 hours/0 minutes DURATION OF STAY per unique vehicle 2-Hour stalls 1 hour/50 minutes No Limit stalls 2 hours/24 minutes VOLUME Unique vehicles observed 255 Rate of cars able to use a parking TURNOVER 5.0 stall over a 10 hour operating day of vehicles violating the posted time stay 10.7% EXCEEDING TIME STAYS Vehicles parked S+hours in time 13(5.1%of unique limited stalls vehicles) Duration of Stay The average duration of stay at downtown on-street spaces is 2 hours exactly,which includes those using 2-Hour and No Limit stalls. Those using 2-Hour stalls average 1 hour and 50 minutes,those using No Limit stalls average 2 hours and 24 minutes.5 Overall, on-street stays in the downtown are relatively short stays. Similarly, the 2-Hour allowance in time limited stalls appears to provide adequate time for users of the downtown. 4A"unique vehicle" represents a distinct license plate number. 5 15-minute stalls are not tracked given that the circuit a surveyor makes to observe stalls is every hour. Given that there were only two 15-Minute stalls in the inventory, it is safe to assume that the use of these stalls has a marginal (if any) impact on the statistical findings presented here. 8 Volume On the survey day, 255 unique license plate numbers were recorded parking in the on-street system between the hours of 9 AM and 7 pM.6 At this level,the on-street system is accommodating an average of about 26 cars an hour. Turnover:Efficiency of the Parking System In most cities, the primary time limit will allow for calculation of an intended turnover rate. For example, if the intended use for a stall is two hours (which is a very"retail friendly' rate of turnover),then the stall should be expected to turn 5.0 times over a ten-hour period. As such, if turnover were demonstrated to be at a rate of less than 5.0,the system would be deemed inefficient. As rates exceed 5.0,the more efficient the system is operating and the more supportive of ground level retail/business activity. In the Tigard downtown the on-street parking system has an average turnover rate of 5.0 turns per stall over a 10 hour period. This indicates a system that is operating at the minimum standard the industry would recommend for an efficient system that is supportive of retail business. To this end, this is good news for the downtown. As land use begins to develop and diversify within this area --and as demand for access increases in the hours preceding and following the current peak hour--it will be important to initiate measures that support higher turnover rates to accommodate growing demand for parking.This may involve decreasing the current number of No Limit on-street stalls or creating more 2-Hour parking off-street. Nonetheless, at this time it appears that Tigard's on-street system meets the minimum standard for efficient for customer access. Exceeding time stays Approximately 11%of unique vehicles parked in 2-Hour stalls downtown exceed the posted time stay. On the survey day, 18 vehicles exceeded 2 hours of parking while parked in a 2-Hour stall. The industry"best practice" standard for time stay violations is between 4%and 9%. Tigard's total is above the high side of the standard, but should not be viewed as troublesome at this time as occupancies are so low. Enhanced enforcement would only be recommended in situations where the rate of violation exceeds the industry standard in a constrained parking environment, where high rates of violation result in less access for patrons. This is not the case at this time in Tigard. 6 It is important to note that this does not represent all vehicles in the downtown on June 4, 2015, as license plate numbers were not recorded in off-street facilities. The unique vehicle total allows us to calculate turnover for the on-street system. 9 Table 5 (next page) provides a breakout of the on-street block faces where the violations occurred. As the table indicates, 33.3%of all observed violations (6) occurred on the block face located on the north side of Main Street, between SW Electric and SW Maplewood Drive. The second most common location for violations of time limited stalls was four vehicles (22.2%) that were located on the west side of Burnham Street. Table 5 Location of Violations at 2 HR Stalls Cross-street(Location) #of Cars in Violation %of Total Of 2hr Time stay North side of Main St, 3 16.7% Between SW Scoff ins St and SW Commercial St North side of Main St, 6 33.3% Between SW Electric and SW Maplewood Drive South side of Main St, 2 11.1% Between SW Maplewood Drive and SW Burnham St West side of SW Burnham St, 4 22.2% South of Main St South side of Main St, 2 11.1% Between SW Burnham St and SW Commercial St South side of Main St, 1 5.5% Between SW Commercial St and SW Scoffins St Total#of Cars in Violation 18 100.0% Another interesting metric related to time stay violations include the fact that 13 of the 18 vehicles exceeding the 2-Hour time stay limit were parked for 5 or more hours. In most cases, vehicles parked for longer than 5 hours are employees. These vehicles were located on the same two block faces noted above,with four vehicles parked over 5 hours on each block face. Also, three vehicle license plates were documented to have moved their vehicles from one spot to another over the course of the day. C. Hourly and Peak Occupancy: Off-street The peak hour for the off-street inventory is between noon and 1:00 PM; the same as the on- street system. At this hour, 53.4%of the 877 parking stalls in the 38 lots within the study area are occupied. Table 6 summarizes occupancies by hour of day and parked vehicles versus empty spaces. Figure C(page 11) illustrates occupancies for each hour of the ten-hour survey 10 day for the combined supply. A detailed table of each of the 38 off-street lots, with its specific peak hour is provided in Attachment a at the end of this document. Table 6 Combined Off-street Supply: Occupancy by Hour of Day—Vehicles Parked versus Empty Stalls Off-street a ° Vehicles 288 356 402 468 425 396 386 390 316 251 Parked Percentage 32.8% 40.6% 45.8% 53.4% 48.5% 45.2% 44.0% 44.5% 36.0% 28.6% Occupied Empty Stalls 589 521 475 409 452 481 491 487 561 626 Key findings include: • The combined supply performs similarly to the on-street supply. • There is a one hour spike between noon and 1:00 PM. • Occupancies in the hour preceding and immediately after the peak are much lower. • Parking in all hours after the peak does not exceed 49%, dropping rapidly beginning at 5:00 PM. • At the peak hour, 468 vehicles are parked, leaving 409 stalls empty. • Individual lots maintain higher peak occupancies (see Attachment B), though many of those lots are smaller sized lots (e.g., Lots 2, 13, 15, and 17). Larger lots (excluding the TriMet Park& Ride Lot 28) are underutilized at the peak hour(e.g., Lots 5, 21, 32, 34, 35, 37 &38). • The initial data for the off-street system indicates that there is a significant supply of stalls that are unused throughout the day. Figure C Tigard Downtown Parking Utilization - June 2015 2015 off-street occupancies(877 stalls) 60% X73.4.% 48.5% 50% 8% �1) 15.2% 44.0%I 'ISI % 40 6 r 40% 316.0% 30/ 0 l 20% 10% 9:30 AM 10:30 AM 11:30 AM 12:30 PM 1:30 PM 2:30 PM 3:30 PM 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 6:30 PM 11 D. Nodal Analysis:Area of Highest Occupancy When evaluating the combined system in the larger study area, constraints in localized areas can often be understated. An evaluation of the peak hour heat map illustration located in Attachment A indicates that there is a clear divide between areas denoted in red (constrained) and those denoted in green (low occupancies). To this end, a "nodal analysis" was conducted for parking located in the parking area outlined in Figure D. The supply located in this area totals 255 stalls; with 38 located on street and 217 located in 12 off-street parking facilities. This is summarized in Table 7. Table 7 Area of Highest Occupancy: Inventory Summary r 1 2.6% r 14 36.8% ® 23 60.5% ® 38 100% Sub-Total: Off-Street Stalls 217 100% E . ® ® ® ® -• 255 100.0% Figure D Nodal Analysis:Area of Highest Occupancy(Main Street between Burnham and Rail) h i r G � Irl l Tigard,Oregon 185% >85 lune 2015' Downtown On-Street ancd Off-Street 84%-70% ® tN°dal Aaallysiis Study Area Parkin Occn anoes B44✓n-7t]00✓n o - 125 917:'fln 1:00 PM ,., 55% ] 69%-55% FLICK WILLIAMIS CONSULTING P..k Hilo., ............. No Parking ��U��U <55% f''a r Ic II rig M k Ir r a¢'u s IM o r ray r li n n 12 As Figure D illustrates, six of 12 lots have peak hour occupancies of 85%or more. On-street parking is also constrained on SW Burnham Street and along the majority of SW Main Street. As Figure E indicates, the peak hour for parking in this node reaches 83.9% between noon and 1:00 PM for the combined supply. During this hour,the on-street supply (38 stalls) reaches 89.5% and the off-street supply reaches 82.9%. Overall, parking in this area is constrained during this peak hour. As was demonstrated in the analysis of the larger study area, parking in this node is generally constrained for about an hour. During the hour following the peak (1:00—2:00 PM), the on- street supply drops significantly from 89.5%to 63.2%,gradually working back to 71.1% between 4:00 and 5:00 PM. The off-street supply drops in the hour following the peak from 82.9%to 77.9%; then staying in the mid 70% range until 5:00 PM. After 5:00 PM, both the on and off- street supplies drop rapidly. What the nodal analysis does provide us is insight into how the south end of downtown performs as contrasted to the north end. Parking in this area is constrained; at least for the one hour period between noon and 1:00 PM. Efforts to move employees currently parking in the node to other areas/lots where abundant parking is available should be explored to ensure that customer access is maintained. Figure E Combined Parking Supply: Summary of Hourly Utilization Tigard: Area of Highest Occupancy Onstreet, Offstreet, and Combined 'Supply (255 stalls) 01 On-Street p Off-Street RP Camlbined 100% coD 901r4 11 rn S0 [3 7MNN � 00P9 w 701 �r!q r� D 4Q7 4g9 � r1[i'9 rn Lr f� 60% , � L.Ln L i uwn dt 501 coq m �� 401 301 201 101 0% 9:30 AM 10:30 AMI 11:30 AMI 12:30 PM 1:30 PM 2:30 PM 3:30 PM 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 6:30 PM 13 E. Analysis:Areas North and South of the Railroad Data was sorted to provide a summary of parking performance for each of the areas that lie to north and south of the railroad. Tables 8 and 9 summarize the inventory break out for these two areas. Parking in these two areas is about evenly distributed,with the north inventory totaling 52.8% of all downtown parking (530 stalls) and the south 47.2% (473 stalls). The distribution of on- street stalls is different,with all stalls in the north area being comprised of 2-Hour stalls (54 total); the south area having a more diverse mix of 15-minute (2 stalls), 2-Hour stalls (38 stalls) and No-Limit stalls (32 stalls). Based on the inventory, the north area on-street system is more focused on customer stalls. Both areas have over 400 off-street stalls located on 16 sites (476 stalls) in the north area and 22 sites (401 stalls) in the south area. Table 8 2015 Tigard Downtown Parking Inventory—North of Railroad r 54 100.0 54 10.2 OEM 476 89.8% Emma530 52.8% Table 9 2015 Tigard Downtown Parking Inventory—South of Railroad 11MINIMMEM ONE 2 2.838 52.8%32 44.4% 72 15.2 EM 401 84.8% MEM473 47.2 14 As the nodal analysis of the area of highest occupancy intimates, the south end of the downtown operates at a higher level of occupancy than the north. Figures F and G (next page) provide hour by hour summaries of occupancy in each area for on-street, off-street and combined parking systems. Occupancies:North Area The highest combined occupancy achieved in the north area is less than forty percent,which is true for both the on-street system (37%) and off-street (36.3%).The peak occurs between noon and 1:00 PM. Interestingly, other than the peak hour, on-street parking in the north area never exceeds 15% in any other surveyed hour of the day. The off-street system does not see as significant occupancy drops in the hours preceding or following the peak, but remain underutilized in every hour of the survey day. Figure F North Area: Summary of Hourly Utilization ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Tigard Downtown Parking Utilization - June 2015 2015 on street,offstreet,and corn bin ed occupancies Noirtlhof railroad Oin-Street(54 stalls) 0 Off -Street(476 stalls) plcornlb'iired(530 stalls) 4 40% m br tS7'.m rn r l q 35° rn r D dtil fab L n 30% .9 0 C6 r)n DO r4 In Ln rr-4 25% ry rw Cc iXd f`: dd 20% a° 3°`"Co DoB 15% c-P 10% dr Ff r+ 5% g 9:30 AM 10:30 AM11:30 AM12:30 PM 1:30 PM 2:30 PM 3:30 PM 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 6:30 PM 15 Figure South Area: Summary mfHourly Utilization Tigard Downtown Parking Utilization - June 2015 2015 on street,off street,and combined occupancies South of railroad 10 Oin-Street(72 stalls) W Off-Street(401 sta I Is) NACoribined(473 stalls) 90% Co Ln Ln jr4Ln C4 Ci Occupancies:South Area The highest combined occupancy achieved in the south area is 75.5%.The peak hour occurs between noon and 1:UUPIVI. Atthe peak hour,the on-street system reaches O6.1Y6,which indicates aconstrained supply. |nthe same hour, off-street parking reaches 73.6Y6, which is robust and (when combined with the on-street supply) likely creates a situation that users find congested. Aswith the larger study area,the peak hour isshort'|ived. Occupancies drop significantly is the hours following the peak, averaging in the mid-60% range for the remainder ofthe day. V||. COK89ARS|ON 2010 TO 2016 In 2010, DKS &Associates conducted parking counts within the same study area as were recently completed inJune ZU1S. The following tables provide comparative summaries byhour ofoccupancy levels bysurvey year.r rHour|yooupancytota|sontheDK3datagraphsvverenot|abe|ed. RVVCestimatedtothebestofourabi|ities hourly occupancies. DKS's graphs were of high quality and we believe our estimates are accurate for purposes of comparing the two different survey years. 16 A. On-street: All Stalls In 2015 use of the on-street system is up in all but one surveyed hour when compared to data derived from the 2010 downtown parking study. At the peak hour(noon-1:00 PM) use is up 10.1 percentage points.This is summarized in Table 10. Table 10 2010 to 2015 Comparison: On-street(All Stalls) On-Street 2010 22% 27% 39% 55% 41% 29% 27% 32% 35% N/A Occupancies 2015 28.6% 33.3% 34.1% 65.1% 42.1% 40.5% 41.3% 45.2% 42.1% 33.3% Occupancies Change 6.6/0 o 6.3%0 X4.9/o0 > 10.1/0 1.1% 11.5% 13.3% 13.2% 7.1% N/A +or c-> B. Off-street: All Stalls In 2015 use of the off-street system is up in all surveyed hours when compared to data derived from the 2010 downtown parking study. At the peak hour (noon-1:00 PM) use is up 12.4 percentage points.This is summarized in Table 11. Table 11 2010 to 2015 Comparison: Off-street(All Stalls) Off-street MEIM 2010 25% 30% 34% 41% 39% 33% 30% 28% 21% N/A Occupancies 2015 32.8% 40.6% 45.8% 53.4% 48.5% 45.2% 44.0% 44.5% 36.0% 28.6% Occupancies Change 7.8% 10.6% 11.8% 12.4% 9.5% 12.2% 14% 16.5% 15% N/A +or c-> C: On-street: North of Railroad In 2015 use of the on-street system in the north area is down in all surveyed hours when compared to data derived from the 2010 downtown parking study. At the peak hour (noon- 1:00 PM) use is down 5 percentage points. This is summarized in Table 12. 17 Table 12 2010 to 2015 Comparison: On-street(North of Railroad) On-Street 2010 11% 12% 15% 42% 27% 15% 15% 15% 19% N/A Occupancies 2015 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 37°0 14.8% 9.3% 11.1% 13% 13% 14.8% Occupancies Change <3.6%> <4.6%> <4.9%> <5.0%> <12.2%> <5.7%> <4.9%> <2.0%> <6.0%> N/A +or<-> D: Off-street: North of Railroad In 2015 use of the off-street system in the north area is up in seven of the nine comparative hours when contrasted with 2010. At the peak hour(noon-1:00 PM) use is up 3.3 percentage points. This is summarized in Table 13. Table 13 2010 to 2015 Comparison: Off-street(North of Railroad) Off-street MZMM=M1M=== =MC= 2010 20% 25% 30% 33% 32% 30% 22% 23% 20% N/A Occupancies 2015 18.9% 25.8% 27.9% 36.3% 34% 31.1% 30.5% 29.2% 22.9% 18.9% Occupancies Change <1.1%> 0.8% <2.1%> 3.3% 2.0% 1.1% 8.5% 1.2% 22.9% N/A +or<-> E: On-street: South of Railroad In 2015 use of the on-street system in the south area is up in all nine comparative hours when contrasted to 2010. At the peak hour (noon- 1:00 PM) use is up 21.1 percentage points. All hours show significant growth. This is summarized in Table 14. Table 14 2010 to 2015 Comparison: On-street(South of Railroad) On-Street 2010 30% 35% 52% 65/ 49% 35% 32% 42% 48% N/A Occupancies 2015 44.4% 52.8% 54.2% 86.1% 62.5% 63.9% 63.9% 69.4% 63.9% 47.2% Occupancies Change 14.4/0 o 17.8/0 0 2.2/0 0 21.1/ 13.5% 28.9% 31.9% 27.4% 15.9% N/A +or<-> 18 D: Off-street: South of Railroad In 2015 use of the off-street system in the south area is up significantly in all nine comparative hours when contrasted to 2010. At the peak hour (noon—1:00 PM) use is up significantly by 21.6% percentage points. All survey hours show significant growth. This is summarized in Table 15. Table 15 2010 to 2015 Comparison: Off-street(South of Railroad) Off-street ' . 2010 33% 39% 43% 52/ 46% 40% 42% 33% 29% N/A Occupancies 2015 49.4% 58.1% 67.1% 73.6% 65.6% 61.8% 60.1% 62.6% 51.6% 40.1% Occupancies Change 16.4% 18.1% 24.1% 21.6% 19.6% 21.8% 18.1% 29.6% 22.6% N/A +or c-> VIII. SUPPLEMENTAL STUDY AREA Subsequent to the June 4, 2015 data collection effort summarized in Sections I—VII above,the City asked that Rick Williams Consulting gather data in a small study are located just to the south and west of the downtown study zone. This area is illustrated in Figure H and,for purposes of this analysis is called the Burnham Study area. Figure H Supplemental Data Collection: Burnham Study Area J July 2015 Tigard'Oregon Buirirnlnairnr Study Area Downtown ern-street and of;-street Parking Study Off-street-(XX yL©t St.II TptM Oin-Street-XXBloekface Stallll TotaV RICK WILLIAMS CONSULTING P'xrk11rg I&'Tr.ti iv s Ip n ii..to t T n ri 19 A. Inventory(Supplemental Burnham Study Area) The supplemental area is comprised of nine off-street parking sites and 15 on-street parking stalls located on SW Burnham Street. In addition,the 2HR Public Parking Lot(site 23/24 in Table 2, page 5)was reevaluated with license plate data to assess users. The entire inventory associated with the supplemental study area is summarized in Tables 16 and 17 below. Each off-street lot is assigned a lot number, lot descriptor and stall total to remain consistent with the larger downtown study method for data collection (Table 17). Overall, at total of 187 stalls were sampled; 15 on-street and 172 offs-street in 10 lots. Table 16 Burnham Study Area: Inventory of Stalls No Limit(on Burnham Street) 15 100.0% On-Street Parking Stalls 15 8.0% Off-Street Parking Stalls 172 92.0% (10 sites) Total Supply Surveyed 187 100.0% Table 17 Burnham Study Area: Inventory of Stalls 23/24 2 HR Public Parking(Burnham Lot) 20 11.6% 39 Stevens Marine 8 4.7% 40 Ferguson 12 7.0% 41 B&B Print Source 9 5.2% 42 Mannings Auto 14 8.1% 43 Henderson Auto 41 23.8% 44 Wyatt Fire Protection 9 5.2% 45 Tigard Vision Center(Visitor/Front Lot) 22 12.8% 46 Tigard Vision Center(Employee/Back Lot) 27 15.7% 47 Scott Hookland LLP 10 5.8% Total Off-Street Parking Stalls 172 100.0% (10 sites) 20 B. Methodology The Burnham Study Area was surveyed on Wednesday,July 8, 2015. The survey was conducted in four hourly counts taken between 11:30 AM and 2:30 PM. The hourly time increments were correlated to the larger Downtown study to assure that the peak hour for the downtown study zone was captured in the supplemental data update. The peak hour for the downtown was found to occur between noon and 1:00 PM (12:30PM). Occupancy counts were taken each hour over the four hour study period in all off-street lots. License plate data was collected each hour for all on-street parking on SW Burnham Street and in Lot 23/24, the Burnham Public Parking Lot where parking is limited to 2 hours. C. Findings: Occupancy Figure I summarizes peak occupancies for the on-street, off-street and combined study inventory. As the table indicates, combined occupancies are low, reaching 56.1%at 2:30 PM. On-street occupancies peak at 73.3%at 12:30 PM and 2:30 PM. Overall off-street occupancies are just over 50%, reaching a peak of 54.7%at 2:30 PM. Figure J (page 22) provides a "heat map" illustration of parking activity at the peak hour. Figure I Burnham Study Area—Supplemental Data Collection Tigard Downtown (Parking Utilization-2015 2015 oinstreet,off street,and combined occulpaincies-SW Burnham St.(1187 stalls) Qua-Street IIIIIIII Off-Street m cor Uned 90% 80% rq n � n n n 70% 60% cn 3° c s Ln a Ln 0 L a Ln Ln Ln 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 11:30 AM 12::30 PMI 1:30 PM 2:30 PM 21 Figure J Burnham Study Area—Peak Hour Occupancies(Heat Map) II. � � 0 r ai , r / � Ilfl�J�� r r f Tigard",Orl@goni >85 IX n51,54July 2015 Downtown-On �rll� e��q��aYa'A"'�'��mq':'�u', m�,^ 841% MIND a�ww��am« Orkin �,Pv a.:u Boa ur. 69%-a: ilro Two Re a OCQrwr Ido q"^wt�, g e 551-% r r ;u n g & p Table 18 provides a lot by lot summary of peak hour use in the off-street supply within the Burnham Study Area. As the table indicates, lot use varies but there are no parking "constraints" off-street, with the exception of Lot 23/24, which is at 90%occupied and intended for short-term customer use. These findings suggest that on-street parking in the study zone is operating moderately throughout the day, but the use of parking in off-street lots is low to moderate. 22 Table 18 Burnham Study Area—Occupancy and Peak Hour by Lot ll m i � m fflili� Mill. m W1�1111 III, WW ii il 23/24 2hr Public Parking 20 90.0% 12:00—3:00 PM 2 39 Stevens Marine 8 62.5% 2:00—3:00 PM 3 40 Ferguson 12 50.0% 11:00 AM—12:00 PM 6 1:00—3:00 PM 41 B&B Print Source 9 55.6% 1:00—2:00 PM 4 42 Mannings Auto 14 42.9% 11:00 AM—12:00 PM 8 1:00—3:00 PM 43 Henderson Auto 41 80.5% 2:00—3:00 PM 8 44 Wyatt Fire Protection 9 44.4% 11:00 AM—2:00 PM 5 45 Tigard Vision Center 22 13.6% 11:00 AM—12:00 PM 19 (Visitor/Front Lot) 46 Tigard Vision Center 27 70.4% 1:00—3:00 PM 8 (Employee/Back Lot) 47 Scott Hookland LLP 10 10.0% 11:00 AM—2:00 PM 9 TOTAL—Combined Lots 172 54.7% 12:00—1:00 PM 78 D. Findings: Utilization of Short-term Supply On-street As stated earlier, there are 15 on-street spaces located on SW Burnham Street in the supplemental study zone. All stalls are No Limit, which allows unlimited time stays. At the peak hour, 73.3%of these stalls are occupied (11), leaving 4 stalls empty. Based on license plate data, it is clear that the majority of users are likely employees as unique license plate numbers were recorded in all hours of the survey parked in a single stall. Table 19 (next page) illustrates this. For instance, stall numbers 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14 and 15 were fully parked by single vehicles over the course of the four hour survey. Stalls 2, 3, 5, 9 and 10 had cars returning to the street that were recorded earlier in the day or in another stall on the same street. Overall, it appears that vehicles parked on SW Burnham Street are employees. If additional short-term parking for the larger downtown is desired, the City should consider time-limiting this section of SW Burnham to 2 HR signed parking. 23 Table 19 Burnham Study Area-License Plate Data on SW Burnham Street8 1 West 2 West 377HC 377HC 3 West 438FW 438FW 4 West 5 West 718DV 718DV 438FW 438FW 6 West 95440 95440 95440 95440 7 West WWV2 WWV2 WWV2 WWV2 8 West AKD18 AKD18 AKD18 AKD18 9 West 970GC 970GC 718DV 718DV 10 West 970GC 970GC 11 East 038EY 038EY 038EY 038EY 12 East 13 East 189DK 189DK 189DK 189DK 14 East 06283 06283 06283 06283 15 East 255HE 255HE 255HE 255HE Off-Street(Lot 23/24 Public 2 HR Lot) A similar trend is in place at the City's 2HR Public Parking Lot on SW Burnham Street(Lot 23/24). License plate data was collected over the four hour survey period in each stall in this lot. There were a total of 20 stalls on the lot. The posted time stay in 2 hours. Table 20 summarizes the license plate date from Lot 23/24. It is clear that single vehicles are monopolizing the lot for long periods of the day. Only two stalls (# 19 and#20) showed use by more than one user throughout the data collection period. The handicap and EV stalls were not used during the data collection period. As with parking on Burnham Street, it appears that this parking area is being predominantly by employees. The City may want to consider increasing enforcement at this lot to move long-term users to other(private) off-street parking facilities. 8 During the study,complete license plate numbers were recorded. To assure the anonymity of the parked vehicles,only partial plate numbers are displayed in Tables 19&20. 24 Table 20 Burnham Study Area- License Plate Data on Lot 23/24(2 HR Public Parking) 1 , 1 . 1 . 1 e- 1 2.0 APZ549 APZ549 APZ549 APZ549 2 2.0 866GQ 866GQ 866GQ 866GQ 3 2.0 966DC 966DC 966DC 966DC 4 Handicap 5 2.0 369DS 369DS 369DS 6 2.0 ZQX92 ZQX92 ZQX92 ZQX92 7 2.0 627FY 627FY 627FY 627FY 8 2.0 ASN183 ASN183 ASN183 ASN183 9 2.0 832EW 832EW 832EW 832EW 10 2.0 936FY 936FY 936FY 936FY 11 2.0 961FD 961FD 961FD 961FD 12 EV 13 2.0 4671 4671 4671 4671 14 2.0 WQX05 WQX05 WQX05 WQX05 15 2.0 815DB 815DB 815DB 815DB 16 2.0 XEA65 XEA65 XEA65 XEA65 17 2.0 BRL17 BRL17 BRL17 BRL17 18 2.0 409EG 409EG 409EG 409EG 19 2.0 010HC 010HC 330HM 330HM 20 2.0 330HM MCHD MCHD MCHD IX. SUMMARY On-street Tigard's downtown on-street supply totals just 126 stalls. At the peak hour(noon—1:00 PM) 65.1%of these stalls are occupied, leaving 44 stalls empty and available. The peak hour lasts for about an hour, with occupancies dropping significantly is succeeding hours. In the smaller"nodal area" south of the railroad tracks (38 stalls), occupancies are much higher, reaching a constrained level of 89.5% in the peak hour. This pattern is replicated between the larger north and south areas separated by the railroad tracks (a peak hour of 86.1%), with the south area operating at about double the occupancy contrasted to the north area. However, as with the larger on-street supply, the peak lasts for an hour and occupancies drop to unconstrained levels in all succeeding hours.This is not to downplay the constraint in these south areas but rather to encourage exploration of opportunities to move users (particularly employees)to areas outside of this "node" where parking appears to be plentiful, especially off-street. This could quickly mitigate the constraint in this node. 25 Also, on-street parking is turning over at an efficient rate (5.0)which is supportive of ground level business. The 2-Hour time limit is very workable given that the average stay at a 2-hour stall is 1 hour/50 minutes. Time stay violations are high by industry standards (10.7%) but increased enforcement does not seem warranted at this time given the lower overall occupancies. Two block faces tend to have the most violators of posted time stays and the vehicles violating these time stays appear to be employees(see Table 5, page 10). A better approach would be to consider decreasing the number of No Limit stalls and finding off-street space for employees who might be parking on-street and/or in the high occupancy node. Off-street Overall, the off-street supply (as a combined system) is underutilized. Peak hour occupancy for the off- street supply reaches 53.4% between noon and 1:00 PM. At the peak hour,there are 404 empty off- street stalls in the study zone. The ability to capture these unused stalls more effectively to manage parking access for all users (visitors and employees) presents a challenge and significant opportunity. Trends between occupancies in the north and south areas of the downtown parallel those for the on- street system, with much higher utilizations in the south area. The challenge for the off-street system is that the vast majority of these stalls are in private ownership, which means working toward shared use agreements with owners of lots with stall capacity is a necessary first step. The summary of each lot's occupancy and stall capacity(Attachment B)can serve as a discussion piece to identify potential stall availability and initiate discussion between downtown stakeholders. The opportunity of course is that the stalls are already built and could become available quickly through shared partnerships. At 404 stalls, this supply actually equals a virtual parking garage. The same 404 stalls in a garage would cost in the range of$14 million to construct. Using portions of this supply as a shared resource for parking would create significant efficiencies and cost benefits to the downtown community. 2010 vs 2015 Overall use of downtown's on and off-street systems has grown between 2010 and 2015.The growth in the on-and off-street system, for all stalls is 10.1 and 12.4 percentage points respectively. Significantly higher occupancy growth has occurred in the area south of the railroad,with the on-and off-street systems up 21.1 and 21.6 percentage points respectively. The north area has shown moderate growth in the off-street system since 2010, but on-street occupancies have fallen in every surveyed hour since the 2010 study. 26 Supplemental Data Collection (Burnham Study Area) Off-street parking in the supplemental data collection area (Burnham Study Area) is only moderately used. At the peak hour, approximately 78 off-street stalls are empty. As with findings in the larger downtown study area,these stalls are on private properties and may not be "available" unless shared use arrangements were made to allow other users to access them. On-street parking on SW Burnham is currently No Limit parking. License plate data indicates that the parking is being used predominantly by employees. There is little turnover on this segment of SW Burnham. Moving forward the City may want to consider time limiting these 15 stalls to better meet customer need. License plate data at the 2HR Public Lot (Lot 23/24) is almost completely dominated by employee users. Only two stalls showed any turnover during the four hour data collection period. The City should consider increased enforcement of this lot to ensure that its short-term user intent is honored. 27 r Z 10 J n,ti En I Z a u �u J s, �'➢l C7 umd7 u Z /f h, u^y Q O ip Z w a j k v �k � Wto l � 4 Lna- 4- r � n / ,r1i' 4 C] ATTACHMENT B LOT BY LOT OCCUPANCIES AND PEAK HOUR e- e. 1 Tigard Cleaners 9 22.2% 9:00—1:00 PM 7 4:00—5:00 PM 2 Car Quest 6 83.3% 11:00 AM—1:00 PM 1 3 Smoke Shop/12215 SW Main 16 18.8% 5:00—6:00 PM 13 4 Main Street Stamp& 12 33.3% 12:00—2:00 PM 8 Stationery 5 State Farm Insurance,Orient 26 30.8% 12:00—1:00 PM 18 Pearl,PC Repair 6 Private Parking 9 22.2% 9:00—10:00 AM 7 Symposium/Public Lot(2 HR o 10:00—11:00 AM 2 7 parking) 15 86.7/ 4:00—5:00 PM 8 Attorney Office 5 80.0% 12:00—6:00 PM 1 9 Tigard Chiropractic 9 44.4% 10:00—11:00 AM 5 4:00—5:00 PM 10 Sherrie's Jewelry Box 6 66.7% 11:00 AM—1:00 PM 2 11 Office 9 44.4% 3:00—4:00 PM 5 12 Tyler's Automotive/Kiss Car 16 93.8% 11:00 AM—12:00 PM 1 Wash Parking behind Tigard o 0 13 Cleaners/Keppler's 14 100.0/ 9:00 AM—7:00 PM 14 Oregon Drive Axle 12 58.3% 10:00 AM—5:00 PM 5 15 Aves Laboratory 5 100.0% 9:OOAM—12:00 PM 0 16 Wei Li Acupuncture Clinic 11 27.3% 2:00—3:00 PM 8 17 Karate on Main(Front lot) 5 100.0% 5:00—6:00 PM 0 12564 SW Main/Diamond 2 18 (Back lot) 7 71.4% 4:00—6:00 PM 19 12564 SW Main/Diamond 36 97.2% 12:00—1:00 PM 1 Gravel Lot 20 Max's Fanno Creek Brew Pub 9 100.0% 12:00—1:00 PM 0 21 Pacific Paint Supply/Fish Field 67 50.8% 12:00—1:00 PM 33 22 Tigard Liquor Store 18 38.9% 12:00—1:00 PM 11 4:00—5:00 PM 23/24 2 HR Public Parking(Burnham) 20 95.0% 12:00—1:00 PM 1 25 Computer Skills/Salon 7 100.0% 11:00 AM—2:00 PM 0 26 Cafe Allegro 20 95.0% 12:00—1:00 PM 1 27 Tigardville Station Pub&Grill 7 42.9% 4:00—5:00 PM 4 28 TriMet Park and Ride 103 94.2% 12:00—1:00 PM 6 29 Barber Shop 6 50.0% 10:00—11:00 AM 3 12260 SW Main—vacant 11 30 (former Frame Central) 16 31.3% 1:00—2:00 PM 31 Tigard Transit Center Building 5 40.0% 9:00—10:00 AM 3 32 Crown Carpet/Live Laugh 39 46.2% 11:00 AM—12:00 PM 21 Love Glass 33 Post Office 24 79.2% 3:00—4:00 PM 5 5:00—6:00 PM 34 Bead Bullies/La Fuentes 39 61.5% 2:00—3:00 PM 15 35 U.S.Bank 25 56.0% 12:00—1:00 PM 11 36 McDonalds 8 62.5% 6:00—7:00 PM 3 37 Rite Aid 129 38.8% 4:00—5:00 PM 79 38 Value Village 107 33.6% 2:00—3:00 PM 71 30 Mama Ln alop N Ma aftaa ftftft a 4-j Mama CL CL U, Ln LLJ 4—J 4*j Lv 0 Ual 4—J 4—J LLI CL LM Ln ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4-J v 4-J M O 4Ln' Ul n ars ' Iiu ii 4—j I I � �j wm, o M 00 M M > o m rl m L N L (6 0 t� N O1 Lr) LA _V N M d' L Ln Lr) 4-J Lr) C a-0 f6 —_ c� m m 0 Lr) N µ a 0 ateJ Z 0 � oNo 4-Jko � � o V LU m m d 00 M o V r14 d M 00 V M O o 4-a �D O v M 00 O1 N �4-, m 4-1 .Q N t i i V a a 0 W CL cs a Vro C6 rL rL 0 V .F4ry) c, V C oCL CA a rL 14 0o L AM +-1 o a� i a 4—, i O C aa, (.0 r14 Lr) r14 06 r14 .-a, 0 rf) Q6 Lr) rf) 0 .-a, i Lr) i CY) 00 i rf) qt 00 0 CY) rf) qt r14 CY) 00 rf) qt r14 %ftmoo Lr) r14 Lr) Lr) 06 00 431 en Ln !-.000T> ca li i r14 Lr) CL LLI i i 0 O� i Lr) Lr) r14 rf) 0 Lr) CL 00 CY) CL 00 oq 00 r14 r14 Lr) rf) 4ma CL E a. ui ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... f ry Ln rr; �rrtwrmua ��l 3 c� C c , i% G7 41 CY) 00 a (ALr) '-Awltxo �r�Jrmarr�w�uF��UUU rr, m ar 41 c7 /� rl 0 C+7 Lr) - „� C � ii � ra�rrT�vu�r�rwa��uZwNd " ) rl a--j gym., 1,,wWMjj Aff f 4- _ 00 z .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. lw �r Wil a--j n w � �o Nye 'C mai ig n� W .... .... .... a ..: ...E ... .. ...E ... .. ...E ... .. ...E ... .. ..1:. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ON O X (3) 41 c13 cc -oob Lin "VI. Jill en LD % " i %6 WEI rn M Ln Jill IF'Ian'Ya� �i�h9,�Pyj�''�Iib�lu��swiV9��491�vpp�,Yjd�9CD WEI In �i ._ 0 6 % ' m u %6, CL LA %VU III Low CL t u Ln rn z C. M 0 " %O,zt "S bib %0, Ln ° ° rA , ' T rn ro r4 714 -C X0 0 co 4-J 0 (13 0 z (1) L- r--� CL C: -C 4-J V) 0 -C c "IR T =3 0 kJo c 0 W 0 0 L- -s" 00 0 o E 't7 %V0,17 0 %Z'LI7 Vi 2 % 0 0 %6"E9 %19"E CL Now* %,V'6,9 0 4W %L'09 CL 0 E �n 0 %T'09 c 0 %6'E9 4m# 19 m u %ZIZ9 O%A' )8'T9 c u -Fo 4PA u 4 %b t,9 r1l, —% 0 N mow -0 CD %T,s9 4-j %9"S9 9 mmm %s,z9 E 0 m CL M%T 98 %T'S9 %FLS [170111 T.F.R.", %T"85 %8"Z Ln H c N m m %VM7 111�11 tkC %17A 0") W T.- ko Ln �t im rq ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... to to = p Ln m _ c--1 V) 110 lop r PS to I I 1 Ill G l I 1 e / Y W. s�yy hl 4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. L O N to QJ N �, Nco 3 ct3 t� to Q -1- tt3 N Q Ln U Q N O co CU %T'9SMEMO= ii co ii `71 _ n M 4—j E %T'S S N co 5 A 1 0 %T'"VS `V 1 81 W v L.L aG 0 s �..L _ 1111111 '?1n6'TS 3 v ° a'as M 41 a) 0 a) %6'TS 4 %9'OS %/-,g9 a--J _O b.0a--+ O ate-+ Q CL U_ CL Q N c O on a--j E ' cu m c CL +-J V i O E E N .C: O {a CL m CL N O - CSA c 4-j O 4-j Q �` 3 N tLU U AIS-2133 4. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 12/01/2015 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Brownfield Initiative Update Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Brownfield Initiative Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Board is requested to provide feedback on the project. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In May 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Brownfields program funded the citywide Brownfields Grant proposal for Community-Wide Assessment. Two assessment grants were awarded in the amount of$400,000: $200,000 for hazardous substances contamination, and $200,000 for petroleum contamination. The grant funds are scheduled to be expended by July 6, 2017. This grant funds the city's Brownfield Initiative. Brownfield redevelopment is necessary for Tigard to become a more livable, walkable and economically resilient community with fewer environmental health risks. The EPA Community-Wide Assessment grant funding will accelerate Tigard's goal of working with business and property owners to clean up occupied, vacant, and/or underutilized brownfields for redevelopment. The city will focus this resource on its downtown urban renewal district, the Vertical Housing Development Zone, the Enterprise Zone, and sites within Tigard's approximately 1,100 acres of employment land (industrial, commercial, and mixed use zones). On February 10, 2015, the Local Contract Review Board awarded a $310,000 contract to a consultant team led by Amec Foster Wheeler (the balance of the grant was allocated for environmental assessments on the Saxony Properties prior to their purchase and for partial reimbursement to the city for staff time). City staff convened a Citizen Engagement Team (CET) for two meetings to provide public input in to the grant funded activities. Eleven members were recruited including representatives of Tigard immigrant communities, Tigard boards and committees (City Center Advisory Commission, Planning Commission, Neighborhood Involvement Committee) and members of the Tualatin Riverkeepers. Their main task was to determine the criteria which were used to prioritize potential brownfield sites within the city. Amec used the economic, environmental, and equity criteria to prioritize the approximately 200 "potential opportunity sites" into a ranked inventory Extensive communication and community outreach has occurred through the creation of a brownfields page on the city's website, business visits, and public meetings. A fact sheet was developed and translated into Spanish and Vietnamese. On July 21, staff and a consultant from Amec held a lunch meeting with bankers, real estate brokers and architects to discuss how the program could benefit their clients who are involved in various aspects of real estate transactions. Two public meetings were held in October. The October 7 meeting was a general overview of the brownfields program. A panel of guest speakers included representatives of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Washington County Health and Human Services, and 1000 Friends of Oregon. About 25 community members attended. Among the feedback received was that brownfield redevelopment should help achieve goals such as: • Community centers where diverse community members can gather (i.e. immigrant, refugees, people of color, low income community) •Affordable housing •Parks • Small business development •Protecting people who live around brownfields The second meeting on October 28 was tailored more specifically to business and property owners. It focused on the nuts and bolts of accessing grant funding. A panel of guest speakers included an environmental law attorney and representatives of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and Business Oregon. There were about 15 attendees. One direct outcome of the meeting was a downtown property owner submitting an application for a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in support of a potential future redevelopment. The application is currently being reviewed for eligibility by the EPA's project manager. Outreach will continue to market the assistance available from the grant funds to Tigard property owners, business owners and the community. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not applicable. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goal 9.1 Develop and maintain a strong, diversified, and sustainable local economy Goal 9.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business Tigard Strategic is Plan Goal 2: Ensure development advances the vision Cit: Council 2015-17 Goals and Milestones Make Downtown a Place Where People Want to Be DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION June 2, 2015: Brownfield Initiative Update February 10, 2015 Local Contract Review Board - Make contract award for Brownfields grant funded services January 27, 2015 Local Contract Review Board- Consider contract award for Brownfields grant funded services January 14, 2014 Consider a Resolution Approving an Application for an EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant Attachments Brownfields Fact Sheet PowerPoint U r ��~� ��Q��~� FACT" ~�" �=-"- " Brownfield redevelopment isanimportant strategy toimplement Tigard's vision to be "the most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest where people ofo0ages and abilities enjoy healthy and interconnected lives.' IN The Tigard Broxvnfie|dsInitiative isaprogram toidentify potentially contaminated sites iDthe city for development, cleanup and reuse. B[OxvDfieldS are properties that are underutilized due tOthe presence or potential presence of contamination that makes reuse of the property more complicated. Broxvnfie|dsmay make you think ofdirty, blighted, abandoned industrial property, but that image is too narrow.Though some broxvnfie|dsare old industrial sites, others are commercial buildings with little ornoobvious environmental contamination. Broxvnfie|ds could beformer service stations, warehouses, abandoned rail rights Ofway O[ residential properties. How can the Tigard 0rownfields Initiative assist me? If contamination is interfering with the property's reuse,an environmental site assessment(ESA)can provide information about the history and current condition ofthe property tohelp you make aninformed economic investment decision. City of�Tg#mrd The Tigard Brownfie|dsInitiative can potentially provide technical and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT financial assistance to private businesses and landowners, prospective buyerscommunity members,and/or community-based and nonprofit l9l�j SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 ' ' organizations. Financial include ESA� Low- interest � � interestloans for cleanup ofeligible properties may beavailable through the state ofOregon. SmmmFmrreDv Redevelopment Project MuxvDor This initiative is funded by grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection 509'718'2420 Agency and builds on the work of previous project funded by a grant uouo@bguzd'ocgov from Business Oregon. What is a brownfield? What are the benefits of brownfield redevelopment Contaminated sites,also known to Tigard property owners? as Brownfields,can harm the In addition to providing benefits to surrounding communities,Tigard environment,contribute to blight and property owners that clean up and reuse their brownfield properties hinder economic development.The may benefit directly by: Environmental Protection Agency defines brownfields as"abandoned, » Realizing an enhanced return from the property by making it idled or underused industrial and more valuable and marketable. commercial properties where expansion » Creating goodwill within the community. or redevelopment » Reducing the likelihood that contamination from the property is complicated by real or perceived will migrate off-site or into the groundwater. environmental contamination." » Reducing the potential need to address liabilities associated with the poperty. What does the Tigard A variety of private and public sector guidance and incentives have Brownfields Initiative do? been developed to encourage brownfield redevelopment. Brownfield redevelopment is seldom easy or risk-free. But if done right, redevelopment The Tigard Brownfields Initiative can bring rewards:jobs, peace of mind, income and a cleaner environment. provides assistance to qualified private individuals, businesses,and nonprofit organizations to assess and clean up How does a community benefit from contaminated sites or brownfields. brownfield redevelopment? Brownfield redevelopment can help Tigard residents and communities How long does it take for the in many ways. Cleanup and redevelopment of the sites can encourage process to be completed? higher property values and create jobs,as well as positively impact the local economy by creating a safer, healthier place for businesses and A full environmental assessment can residences. Community benefits include: take several months depending on the situation. However it is well worth the » More community facilities like parks,trails and open space. investment of your time compared » Bringing new jobs into the community. to the risk of buying a site with unknown contamination,or locating Bringing new investment into the community. contamination on your property after » Eliminating health and safety hazards. construction has started. » Eliminating eyesores. Enhanced public health. Improved property values and increased business investment. Increasing the productivity of the land. More productive use of existing infrastructure. When brownfields sit idle, everyone in Tigard loses. Neighbors face environmental worries and reduced property values. New businesses seek out pristine "greenfields" or undeveloped land, promoting sprawl, usually in less walkable areas. To learn more about the services provided by this initiative for your property, contact Tigard Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly at 503-718- 2420,sean@tigard-or.gov or visit http://www.tigard-or.gov/brownfields. e Ti* gard • • • Initiative Update City Center Development Agency Board a Dcccmbc -2015 oo� What is a Brownfield? • A brownfield is a property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Why did Tigard start a Brownfields initiative? • Low supply of employment and industrial land • Act as a problem-solver in readying private and public properties for redevelopment. • Encourage implementation of strategic plan for a more walkable and interconnected city • Create safer, healthier place for businesses and residences. �� I<d U. S. EPA Brownfields AGrant * Notified o f $400.,000 award May, 2014 * 3 Year Work Plan * $200K for hazardous SubStanseS, $200K f petroleum - � � � LU �/ 3{ ppbVe- Brownfields Assessment Process (mayor components • Program Setup & Team Coordination • Community Outreach Develop t r g & Rank Sites * Phase I ESA * Phase 2 ESA a Cleanup i i ,, _ , , , SAA -\� \\L\ \ \ Outreach activities : • Formed Community Engagement Team (CET) to develop n. ranking criteria for inventory • Economic Development lunch meeting with bankers, builders and brokers SAA -\� \\L\ \ \ October 7th Meeting • General overview • Feedback- BF redevelopment should help achieve goals such as: o Community centers where diverse community members can gather (i.e. immigrant, ti s o refugees, people of color, low income community) o Affordable housing o Parks o Small business development• o Protecting people who live around brownfields SAA -\� _ M \\L\ \ \ October 28th Meeting • Tailored more _ specifically to business andp ptY owners.ro er It focused on the nuts and � � bolts of accessing grant funding \\ • Onep ptY ro er owner _ applied for assistance Develop InventorY and Rank Sites • Develop Site Inventory • Recently Completed • (200 potential sites; a work in progress) • GIS Based • Source Data • Environmental Data Bases State: SCSI, Leaking UST, Landfills Federal: RCRA, CERCLIS • Ranking of Sites • City worked with Community Engagement Team (CET) • Attributes used in ranking sites • Three main categories: Economic, Environmental, and Equity • Relative weights applied. I.E. more critical = greater weight • Ranking is one tool for City to use in prioritizing sites Site InventorY of Opportunity Sites km - _ LEGEND .F ml All Al LArr rN Lm ig Jib IM -� 1 F � t z ,- Phase I ESA • Site Application from Interested Party • Determine • Inventory Ranking Score (high vs low) • Complete Phase I ESA • Complete All Appropriate Inquiry for CERCLA . Protection • Evaluate potential for significant contamination which may affect property value, occupational ; safety, ease of development • Required by most lenders - • Components Include: - - • Historical Review (Fire Insurance Maps, etc) • Interviews • Site Reconnaissance • Environmental Records Review • Results: • Determine whether Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with site Phase II E �� • Addresses Phase I RECs • Sample Collection/Testing • Soil, surface water, groundwater, sediment, soil gas • Prepare Project Plans for Regulatory Approval • Comply with Endangered Species Act (ESA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) • Laboratory Analysis • Report states if contamination exists, and if so, explains regulatory implications Cleanup Planning • Analysis of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA) • Identify cleanup goals RAOs - • Identify potential cleanup technologies/solutions • Based on exposure pathways y • Based on current/future land use E • Targeted cleanup levels (RBCs) a �... e • Media specific (e.g. soil vs MM® groundwater) -��-�- • Alternatives Analysis • Rank based on numerous factors such as: • effectiveness, • long-term reliability • implementability ' • implementation risk • sustainability EPA Cleanup Grant • Application for $400K to remediate the Saxony site on Main Street/Fanno Creek • Draft ABCA prepared • Public meeting to comment on December 9 Project Schedule 2015 2016 2017 Task Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Grant Administration Community Engagement Inventory Characterization Cleanup Planning AIS-2412 5. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 12/01/2015 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Resolution Authorizing EPA Brownfield Cleanup Grant Application Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Board of the City Center Development Agency adopt a resolution approving the submission of a grant application for an EPA Brownfields Cleanup grant? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Board adopt the resolution to demonstrate support for the grant application. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has grant funding available for local jurisdictions and non-profits to clean up contaminated properties whose redevelopment will benefit the community. The City Center Development Agency recently acquired the Saxony Pacific properties which are planned to be redeveloped into a combination of public space and private redevelopment to further the revitalization of downtown. If awarded, the funds will be used to clean up contamination on the property and prepare the site for redevelopment. EPA Cleanup grants awards are for $200,000 for a site. Because the Saxony property consists of two tax lots where contamination is present, the Agency is eligible to apply for two grants, for a total of $400,000. Grant guidelines require a cost share of 20% for the awardee. The cost share may be in the form of money, labor, material, or services. Prior to grant submittal the applicant must undertake a community notification where a draft Analysis of Brownfields Alternatives report is publically presented for comment. This public meeting is scheduled for December 9 at 6 pm in Town Hall (prior to a scheduled City Center Advisory Commission meeting.) The EPA Cleanup Grant program is highly competitive and sixty grants are expected to be awarded nationwide. The applications are due December 18. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Should the Board choose not to adopt this resolution, the grant application would not be submitted. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Tigard City Council 2015-17 Goals and Milestones Goal #2. Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be Increase walkable access to open space by advancing plans for new downtown open space, including the Tigard Street Trail plaza, the Fanno Creek Overlook and a Main Street plaza, including programming. City Center Urban Renewal Plan Goal 1: Revitalization of the Downtown should recognize the value of natural resources as amenities and as contributing to the special sense of place. Goal 5: Promote high quality development of retail, office and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape, transportation, recreation and open space investments. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goal 9.1 Develop and maintain a strong, diversified, and sustainable local economy Goal 9.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business Special Planning Areas- Downtown Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village. Goal 15.3 Develop and improve the open space system and integrate natural features into downtown. Tigard Strategic Plan Goal 2. Ensure development advances the vision DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION November 24, 2015 (CCDA authorization to acquire Saxony properties) Fiscal Impact Cost: 480,000 Budgeted (yes or no): no Where Budgeted (department/program): CCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: If successful,the grant would provide $400,000 in revenue.An 20%cost share is required. Estimated costs to clean up the property are $199,000 to $319,000. This does not include demolition of the structures. Attachments CCDA Resolution EPA Grant CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMITTAL OF AN EPA BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Brownfields program has funds available for communities to cleanup potentially contaminated sites; and WHEREAS, environmental contamination is a barrier to the redevelopment envisioned in the City Center Urban Renewal Plan; and WHEREAS, the grant will enable the City Center Development Agency to address contamination on the recently purchased Saxony-Pacific property to address the issue. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,by the Tigard City Center Development Agency that: SECTION 1: The City Center Development Agency approves submittal of an application for an EPA Brownfields Cleanup Grant SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 12015. Chair— City of Tigard City Center Development Agency ATTEST: Recorder— City of Tigard City Center Development Agency CCDA Resolution No. 15- Page 1 AIS-2136 6. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 12/01/2015 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Annual Report on the Urban Renewal District Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: City Center Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Annual Report on the Urban Renewal District STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Board is requested to provide feedback to the presentation. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY A PowerPoint presentation will be presented reviewing urban renewal projects in 2015. Among the topics will be: •The $31 million Burnham and Ash mixed use project, including activities that led to the November groundbreaking •Acquisition of the Saxony property and current redevelopment design planning • Completion of the Main Street gateways and public artwork • Successful Metro Community Plan and Development Grant application for pre-development activities on the Tigard Transit Center and the Main Street Nicoll properties OTHER ALTERNATIVES No alternative for consideration at this time. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard City Council 2015-17 Goals and Milestones Goal #2. Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be City Center Urban Renewal Plan DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION February 3, 2015:Joint meeting with the CCAC Attachments PowerPoint e Ti* gard Development Agency • • 2015 Year 1n Review City Center Development Agency Board ., Dcccmbe Tigard City Center Development Agency t � zDowntown URA Word Plan Bubble Chart Publics HIGH n TigardfitreetTrall Yard Rede;reEopment i —0- in Street Lofts Fanno Creek Ash Avenue � Joint oss�Devecipment �eande � €Loa�Cg� ill Property \ Ver tical Housing—� "i \� Acquisitions Bcrn rofields Dave DeelogmentZa€� ® Ivinil Irlain:Street Stralling St€ee>•_ Downtown Parking S � ..any Property Main street Management �` � ® � � an o\reek Redevelopment Green Street dcirticnafPub€€cSpace �� Phase If Lg cs .,m.. 10 & \vaanSt terrayPu61€c'\\ \ \ � \ \Redevelo mens end Public � Property °cq,ui €t€o: and Planning \ O \\ \\ \ \\ 1 LLI TDA Capacity TDA Ca aacity. Rede,rerapment and Building Building - Public Space Planning \ \ 0 Developer Engagement and Development � @ Public Works Yams 2nd Site �\ tC.7 Grant) Main Street Green Street SVV Corridor QJ Phase t TteO T I P_ , Projects h9a€r Street ff \, Parking.LID Burnham StreetA�� Parking Lot ■ S Completed 2 Completed 2 Completed Fa de Projects ,StroIlingstreet Strifling Street Main Street Trail Main Street ma=n Street Projects MainStreet Projects Street Fair Undercros€=ing Street Fair Street Fair' ( Street Fair LOW Ligh ng I t I l MAR 2013 SEPT 20713 MAR 2014 SEPT 201= MAR 2016 SEPT 201' MAR 2616 SEPT 2016 MAR 2017 FY 17-16 Time to Complete Crc e size represents a project's relative impact can achieving urban rene-wal plan goals. New=A Moved= Uncertaan T€ml ne=0 Completed= U PDA,TED SEPTEMBER 2015 Burnham and Ash Redevelopment y e c Burnham and Ash Redevelopment I'M \\ r_ Burnham and Ash Redevelopment Tasks that got us there OWNS\ v_ v r VA vv \\ Burnham and Ash Redevelopment �4 IM F s e � � _ Saxony PPurchase and Redevelopment Planning » « r T5� a Tigard Saxony Pirope .7e.. - De e o n= 3 ��t:.�� B,.-, .. e View €. - V Gateways and Art V n Main Street Lofts Joint Development Study 4 8 $100,000 Metro Community Planning and sDevelopment Grant - ; notification in September Ve y ka Stud 0.45 acre Nicoli site Tga� a-tQ ,e. and 0.81 Tigard Transit � Center for mixed use = redevelopment � Develop options for - transit center Rh Figure 1: Downtown Tigard Urban Lofts Development Site- reconfiguration Project Location 0 122 2a`0 3W F¢Eq Strolling Street Program t Strolling Street Program .... . ...... NOR, \ ` \ - , x Tigard Street Trail e Oak- OEM vA Y f � >r y q K T - Tigard Street Trail ve, S c- ommonc �o o- ge Za All B. C; C, n- to Fc-,-no CreeK 3 o ns f Panne connect Main Street Transformation NOr WNE _ \ = F u Fm e 201619s A Look Ahead • Saxony site finalized plans and permitting • Main/Fanno public space • Main Street Lofts joint development study start up • High Capacity Transit decisions- Downtown alignment and station location • Strolling Street projects • Burnham/Ash opens its doors