The URL can be used to link to this page

05/13/2015 - Packet Completeness Review for Boards, Commissions and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD CCAC - City Center Advisory Commission Name of Board, Commission or Committee May 13, 2015 Date of Meeting I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record. Joe Patton,Meeting Secretary Print Name (1'-'q XPVpl Signature June 11, 2015 Date City of Tigard ■ City Center Advisory Commission Agenda MEETING DATE/TIME: May 13, 2015 — 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Permit Center Lobby, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER Carine 6:30 Welcome and Introductions 2. CONSIDER MINUTES Carine 6:35 3. NON-AGENDA ITEMS/PUBLIC COMMENT Carine 6:40 4. SW CORRIDOR HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT Malu Wilkinson (Metro) Dave Unsworth (TriMet) 6:45 Review Downtown HCT alignments under consideration in STS Corridorplanning 5. BURNHAM/ASH MIXED USE PROJECT Sean 7:30 Review current design and open house 6. REVIEW URBAN RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTS STATUS Carine, Ravi 7:40 7. ART /GATEWAY PROJECT UPDATE Sean 8:05 8. STROLLING STREET PROGRAM UPDATE Sean 8:15 9. LIAISON REPORTS All 8:20 10. ADJOURNMENT Carine 8:30 *EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Center Advisory Commission may go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public. Upcoming meetings of note: Tuesday,June 2,6:30 p.m.CCDA Board Meeting,City Hall Wednesday,June 10,6:30 p.m.,Regular CCAC Meeting, Red Rock Creek Conference Room CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA— May 13, 2015 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGARD CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION Meeting Minutes May 13, 2015 Members Present: Carine Arendes (Chair),Linli Pao (Vice Chair), Deanie Bush,Joyce Casey, Laura Fisher, Lynn Scroggin, Sherrie Devaney, and Ravi Nagaraj (alternate) Members Absent: Paul Miller, and Richard Shavey Staff Present: Downtown Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly; Senior Administrative Specialist Joe Patton; and Economic Development Coordinator Emily Leuning Others Present: Councilor Marland Henderson, Council Liaison to the CCAC;Brian Harper, Metro; and Dave Unsworth,TriMet 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Arendes called the meeting to order at 6:35 pm. The meeting was held in the Tigard Permit Center Lobby, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Joe recorded the roll call. 2. CONSIDER MINUTES The April 8, 2015 CCAC Minutes were approved. 3. NON-AGENDA ITEMS/PUBLIC COMMENT A. The downtown Art Walk runs through Friday,May 15. B. Discussion on bringing the YMCA to Tigard,possibly downtown,is occurring. C. Metro has a new round of the Community Planning&Development Grants. An application for funds is planned to look at redeveloping the transit center and Frame Shop as a combined project. Chair Arendes called for public comment. There was none. 4. SW CORRIDOR HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT Brian Harper gave an overview of the project including projected future needs, demand through and across the corridor,lack of choices, safety problems, travel time, the timeline for major decisions and the continued outreach to Tigard residents. Dave Unsworth briefly discussed some of the options along the Southwest Corridor outside of Tigard. He then discussed the five Tigard options in depth. He also discussed the Southwest Service Enhancement Plan including frequent service,route changes,new bus lines and Community/Jobs Connector Shuttles for areas where a full size bus is not feasible such as the Bull Mountain area. 5. BURNHAM/ASH MIXED USE PROJECT Sean discussed some of the design changes made as a result of comments received at the open house including a fourth story (third floor townhouse) to building number one and a deck on the fourth floor looking out to Fanno Creek. They are looking at ways to treat the windows to prevent bird Page 1 of 2 CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION IvLaq 13,?U 15 strikes. The design will likely meet many LEER (Leadexsltip in. Energy and Environmental Design) standards, but it will not be LEEK certified due to the casts to do so. G. REVIEW URBAN RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTS STATUS Scam noted there are more projects on the list than the urban renewal funding will allow the completion of, even with funding from additional sources. +Canine led the CC_�C in a group exercise to determine the priorities of the projects. The tap three projects were Plazas, Rail to Trail and Public Restrooms. 7. ART /GATEWAY PROJECT UPDATE City Council reviewed the bids and decided to complete both Gateways. Council vv=ill formally-make the award at the contract at the end of the month. 8. STROLLING STREET PROGRAM UPRATE The two properry owners are working with the contractors and getting estimates. The completion of the projects is Scheduled for this summer. 9. LIAISON REPORTS A. The. City is considering increasing SDC fees while ado offering a reduced rate for downtown devrelopmeut creating an bicentive. B. The TDA is sponsoring a bus trip to Lake Oswego to learn about their art program on May 19. C. There are bikc racks, a bike repair station, benches and glass ball artwork downrown that were provided by the TDA through a grant from the Washington Count}-Visitors :'association. 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:47 pm. 000�1 Joe Patton,CCAC Meeting Secretary A "ES : axinc Arendes, Chair Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM#5 Burnham & Ash Mixed Use Development QhG V c 4� r r__ CCDA Board Presentation May 5, 2015 ' ?, , Cts r — City of Tigard Vicinity Map 11 � PitOJECT SITE L \ mol LEGEND ' - -- rwmrmr MCAPSTC7NE harmine �.,. PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE PERSPECTIVE-BUILDING 2 X007 1 L � I 17) if OCAPSTONE llarmens PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE PERSPECTIVE-BUILDING 1 FRONT X002 r - 1� f t rt cb k, OCAPSTC7NE harmine �.,. PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE PERSPECTIVE-BUILDING 1 FROM PATH X003 i„ _ • I - 11 FANNO CREEK BUILDING 2 i I L BUILDING 1 I - S i SITE PLAN �R LARUSCAPE ARCHITCCIS PC ® � MCAPSTQNE BURNHAM&ASH MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT i;c'1}1 Parrl7crs 04.22.2075 Pueuc OPEN House SITE PLAN X050 i PREVIOUS VERSION -- _ i / -I ,ex reA ren � ze xxea � I f _ - Y, aLL 12'L'i i zen,xen xenon+ - sexzsa -- rex xcx ren li li ,ex ,.ax IIffi¢fFF•wr �x 1 ® FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1 -LEVEL 1 \ r �r I�TTLL a�sx•-r-o^ � MCAPSTO L BURNHAM&ASH MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CC9�,1 Partners on.2z.zo15 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FLOOR KLAN•BLDG 1-LEVEL 1 X761 i UPDATED VERSION -- r srUca r.a,oa ,ea•oei ,eaovx ft t 1 zaa.zax - E-1 - I i % r E .— E i I 3BMi BA GOHImm WAt9, I airnwcs �: ..: cuaaxE ewe.eNu�aa aEc bvrE.w d�F-c �va�xew.asx aw�mxc I � FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1-LEVEL 1 a /��T 3132'-1'-0" I w�PSTONE BURN HAM&ASH APARTMENTS Partners 65.65.2015 CODA BOARD PRESENTATION FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1•LEVEL 1 X101 PREVIOUS VERSIONEf agaBe i I - I �ogb�q eqa en 1aP P I leq IMy I I I ' I I � aYiaxeq - r I lex ,eq — . -- �l I' u ET Tri U-1 rtT_ �.q I&I a FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1 LEVEL 2 3 f1 r A ATL ��•_,•� ® � MICAPSTIO 1� BURNHAM&ASH MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CCDA Partners - oa222oi5 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1-LEVEL 2.3 X102 UPDATED VERSION -- I o. .�.—A -- ri !'J [_7 I — I �rrT � __ rrmm�on• t I rl gas aox.®mw , 0 0 -- zaa.xen sruaro snmia s•uow eruaa eiuua ,sn ian ,tea iea ,u ,me xemx er, FLOOR PLAN-BLDGMp 1 -LEVEL 2-3 §CAPsi'ON1 BURNHAM&ASH APARTMENTS Partners 05.05.2015 CODA BOARD PRESENTATION FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1•LEVEL 2-3 %702 LJ PREVIOUS VERSION — — nem a 1 leW al I I aen.ana _ I I aeW.e� ,SW iap lee �\ xWR.xW4 — I — LLI see.f — aersloB, senyaea ven eee lee ten Pee a>NW,x s9essell I f I I l I Il I I U ® rl - e. wnn 077-7 - I I F = f ase.a eW - - ,s,aw,aE mnnioa, _� maWx I - I I I I I li rneb sxuoro ,en ml ,en ,WW ae'..ae. �e� nnen masa len I I FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1 -LEVEL 4 Jnr-r.o° I OCAPSTONE BURNHAM&ASH MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT I� Partners 04.22.2015 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FLOOR KLAN-BLDG t-LEVEL 4 X104 UPDATED VERSION -- _ TT -_ tL t - I 11 Tl z�.z a. ao mob Sao snore .sem ,� FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1-LEVEL A §CAPSTONE BURNHAM&ASH APARTMENTS Partners 05.05.2015 CCDA ROARD PRESENTATION FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 1-LEVEL 4 X104 PREVIOUS VERSION ws, L-=*11 11 L7�111----]7�—L=71*=�� 11 1 F-1 FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL_1 3:32'=14 IF7 I f I - I zensan s � _ 1 RM I zea ea luau mmiu cmuo mmw suoiu en epiz s. f I I FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 2-3 r A ITL 3132'=1'-0" G NCAPSTONE BURNHAM&ASH MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Partners 04.22.2015 ausuc OPEN House FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 1-3 X71 E UPDATED VERSION I ' , aim I 1 I 1 � n 1 ®CII�� el mea 1� FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 1 an 1I aex«au a,uao samao avow s,wio aw�� J om aNCI� 5 9R �� Sn 1 FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 2-3 OCAPSTONE BURNHAM&ASH APARTMENTS Partners ,..... FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 1-2 05.05.2015 CCDA BOARD PRESENTATION X177 UPDATED VERSION n�E I i L Idli IV,; FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 3 ® f j' i `-- ------- FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 4IROOF�� Baa^_a;p. c DCAPSTONE BURNHAM&ASH APARTMENTS Partners __ 05.05.2015 CCDA BOARD PRESENTATION FLOOR PLAN-BLDG 2-LEVEL 34 X112 AGENDA ITEM #5 Comments submitted by online survey from April 22 Burnham and Ash Mixed Use open house as of May 4. Promote the Downtown vision of an active, Promote transit Promote high quality, mixed use urban usage and pedestrian friendly urban Promote village? accessibility? design and architecture? walkability? Yes 6 5 6 6 Unsure 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 0 0 Comments: Unknown: More bike parking, and ways to encourage using trails, biking and walking Paula (Gpdiamond@comcast.net): I think this project will elevate community life. Brian Wegener (brian@tualatinriverkeepers.org): Please take the opportunity to make this project a showcase of sustainable stormwater green technology. Meeting pre-development hydrology for the site (DEQ's new standard) would require that all stormwater be retained on site. Please consider using urban renewal funds to take green infrastructure beyond the minimum required. The flat roof is ideal for a green roof (aka eco-roof). Additional trees can be planted in the parking lot without losing parking spaces using a linear well and structural soil in a design like that used at THPRD Sunset Swim Center. See http://www.parkingforest.org/ This would help Tigard achieve the overall goal of 40%tree canopy city-wide. Since the building exterior will have significant glass, and it is located adjacent to a natural areal, Fanno Creek Park, bird strike mortality is a risk that should be minimized. SEE www.portiandoregon.gov/bps/article/446308 AGENDA ITEM #6 DesiredNot Yet Started High=Most Urban Renewal Projects Project D• Desired Add'I Streets:Ash Ave extension including RR Crossing,Ash Ave auto crossing over A.Street Improvements Fanno Creek 2.Scoffins Street/Hall Connect Scoffins to Hunziker Road where they cross Hall Blvd. 1.75 Considered in SW Corridor Boulevard/Hunziker Re-Alignment Impact on existing apartment development Dependent on site redevelopment&negotiations with RR Comment on Project Type:Each of these streetscapes is awaiting an anchor property development. Comment on Project Type:Continue to lay groundwork for future investment B.Streetscape Improvements Add']Street:Ash Ave Addition of landscaping features,street trees,street furniture and 3.Commercial Street 2.5 other physical enhancements Could be part of SW Corridor 5.Scoffins Road Addition of landscaping features,street trees,street furniture and 2.25 other physical enhancements Could be part of SW Corridor Addition of landscaping features,street trees,street furniture and 6.Center Street 2 other physical enhancements C.Bike/Pedestrian Facilities Add'I Facilities added:Tigard St Trail by Rail,Commuter Rail Access 3.Scoffins Street Install bike lanes and sidewalks on Scoffins Street 1.75 Could be part of SW Corridor 4.Tigard Street bike lane 1 Install bike lane 2.25 Tigard St Trail may address 6.Center Street Provide sidewalks and bike lanes on Center Street 1.75 7.Enhanced Pedestrian Bridge over Facilitate access between residential neighborhoods west of Fanno Fanno Creek Connecting to Ash Creek and downtown,while minimizing impacts to sensitive areas 2.25 Avenue Z and preserving wetlands buffers. Bridge to be replaced as part of remeander New at-grade bike/pedestrian crossing extending from the 9.Tigard Street/Grant intersection of Tigard Street and Grant Street to the north side of 2 Bicycle/Pedestrian Crossing 1 the railroad tracks to facilitate circulation and access by non- motorized vehicles. E.Public Spaces Add'I Public Space:Parks-Fanno Creek work restoration Development of a green corridor/urban creek extending from the Z intersection of Hwy 99 and Hall Blvd through downtown to Fanno 1.Green Corridor/Urban Creek 1.75 Creek,with bio-swales,native vegetation,pervious pavement and other low impact stormwater conveyance features. Cost could be prohibitive 2.Plazas Public plazas and gathering spaces encouraging a broader range of 2.75 Original intent to provide plaza adjacent to Fanno Creek Park.New sites being active and passive recreational uses in downtown. evaluated Small gathering near Main&Burnham:Chamber Bldg.,Saxony Properties,Fanno Creek Park,Existing Post Office location 3.Urban Green Spaces Urban green spaces designed to promote the preservation of 2 Fanno Creek Park and Plaza Master Plan completed environmentally sensitive areas urban green spaces to protect green areas Not Yet Started High=Most Desired Urban Renewal Projects Project D• Desired F.Public Facilities Performing arts center to provide new entertainment and recreation 1.Performing Arts Center 1.75 opportunities to attract residents and visitors to downtown. Needs a champion to support 2.Public Parking Facilities 1 Design and construction of new parking facilities 2 Consider future parking needs. 20 space surface lot completed. Is there a location on the"fringe"that might be suitable in the future 3.Post Office Relocation Relocate the existing downtown post office. 2 Large property on main street that could bring money to city. Federal government to move this facility To be pursued with public space. It would be best to align these projects to the development of the new rental 4.Public Market Area Development of public market space in the public use area 1.75 property development,since these services affect the tenants Needed for convenience of new tenants downtown Farmers Market in Public Works parking lot;City may need to support better. To be pursued with public space 5.Public Restrooms Provision of public restrooms in public gathering spaces. 2.25 Could be incorporated into a variety of projects.For families with kids bathrooms are a necessity. G.Planning and Development Assistance Grant program instead 4.Commercial Fagade Improvement Diamond Housing Development,new Housing development,PO Relocation. Loans Fayade improvement loans 2 New Development Grant\Loan Program Rehabilitation\Restoration Grant\Loan program Technical Assistance Program H.Property Acquisition-From Willing Sellers 1.None planned at this time Future ownership opportunities may arise 2 Miller property,Crown Carpet,Dance Studio Ranked as a low priority for us because it will happen anyway. Ball is just starting roll,if we want momentum to con't we will need to work at it. I.Property Disposition- URP would need to be amended to extend time horizon 1.None planned at this time Ferguson property has lease in place until 2024 2 Other properties may become available-stay opportunistic NOTES-comment applies to more than one project 1.Tigard street walking trail associated projects:It would be ideal to align these projects with the walking trail,since they either affect the same areas or benefit the people who use the trail 2.Fanno Creek meander associated projects:It would be best to collaborate with PRAB and align these projects with the Fanno Creek meander since it affects that project Summary: The highest ranked projects in the UR Plan that have not yet been started are: Commercial St and Scoffins Rd streetscape improvements, The Tigard St bike lane, the pedestrian bridge over Fanno Creek, Plazas and Public Restrooms. Only 4 out of 9 CCAC members ranked and commented on projects, so this list is far from definitive. Compiled by Carine Arendes AGENDA ITEM #7 Tigard City Center Development Agency t The 0tv ty'Hgaril's, tlrbarr l r}rrc�rr ct�'31q �t+rrc.a. COAD V M TO: Chair Arendes and the City Center Advisory Commission FROM: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager RE: Agenda Item 7: Art/Gateway Project Update DATE: May 6, 2015 Art Public art was identified in the Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan (adopted by the City Council in 2006) as an important element "to bring more vitality to the downtown experience by creating a set of interconnected places and emphasizing the flow of people, history, and nature." The City Center Advisory Commission designated a Public Art Subcommittee in August 2011 to advise on integrating artwork into the Main Street Green Street project,which was then under design. The group met nine times between October 2011 and December 2013. The city contracted with art consultant Valerie Otani to advise the committee. The subcommittee provided the following preferences: • Mark gateways at Pacific Highway with sculptures to invite travelers onto Main Street • Art should be purchased rather than leased or borrowed for temporary display • The artwork funding level should about $75,000 or two percent of the estimated $3.7 million Main Street project cost The CCDA Board concurred with these recommendations in March 2012. In December 2012, the CCAC Public Art Committee, including CCAC liaison Director Henderson selected artist Brian Borrello, one of 80 artists who responded to an RFP. Borrello had completed public art projects in several cities, including Oregon City and Portland. On March 27, 2013 a Downtown Art visioning session was held with artist Brian Borrello and over 25 participants. Participants expressed a preference for art that was inspired by natural forms and had a connection to Tigard history. On July 8, 2013 presented the "Filberts" concept to the CCAC Public Art Subcommittee. The subcommittee and the City Center Advisory Commission both approved the concept. At their July 23, 2013 meeting, the City Center Development Agency Board expressed a preference for additional arts concepts. Borrello developed new gateway concepts based on the subcommittee review criteria of 1) Artistic quality 2) Scale (make an impact in an auto-oriented environment) 3)Audience engagement (remain interesting over repeated viewings) 4) Tigard themes(connection to natural environment) 5) Contribute to downtown vitality The three alternatives were presented to the subcommittee on December 12, 2013. The subcommittee expressed a strong preference for the "Petals" option. Comments expressed by the subcommittee included: o like the idea of"new life," downtown Tigard is evolving, developing, good symbol o really catches your eye day and night o simple and beautiful The City Center Advisory Commission concurred and at the January 7, 2014 CCDA Board meeting, the concept was approved. It was recognized that the original budget for the art project- $62,000 would need to be increased to $82,000 to reflect the additional costs of materials and fabrication of 16' pieces. This contract amount includes concept development,working with the committees, artist fee, design, engineering, fabrication and installation. Gateways In the 2011-12 CCDA budget $120,000 was allocated to build gateway walls at either end of Main Street, similar to the gateway wall that was built at the corner of Burnham and Hall. This was prior to the art subcommittee's recommendation to install art at these locations. It was assumed that the gateways would be integrated into the Green Street construction, as the plans had a "base" southern gateway (consisting of landscaping). There would be cost savings associated with the Main Street contractor constructing them as part of the larger project. Due to the delay in selecting an art concept, the gateway design was de-coupled from the Green Street project. In January 2014 the city contracted with Koch Landscape Architecture on a plan for the gateway areas that would complement the selected art concept. Their work scope included survey, schematic plans, construction drawings, grading plan, lighting plan, planting and irrigation plan, construction details, technical specifications, construction cost estimate. Before any design work had begun the landscape architect had provided a rough estimate of$150,000 to construct the gateways. The completed plans feature stone walls,including built-in seating made of rock, similar to the Hall Boulevard and Burnham Street gateway. It will feature the message "Welcome to Downtown Tigard." The artwork would rest on a mounded area behind the wall (approximately 8 feet above grade) to make the artwork highly visible,which was considered a priority by the CCAC Public Art Subcommittee, CCAC and CCDA. In November 2014, with the design at 70%, KLA provided a construction cost estimate of $369,937 (direct construction costs). The significantly higher cost estimate was attributed to 1) the length and height of wall and amount of stone veneer; 2) the fact that this stone wall is serving as a retaining wall for the mounded earth (unlike the Burnham Street and Hall Boulevard gateway); and 3) the cost to install electric utilities for lighting. 2 At their February 11, 2015 meeting, the CCAC recommended writing a letter to the CCDA Board advocating that both gateways be constructed. This letter was presented at the March 3 meeting. The city issued an Invitation to Bid (ITB) for the construction of the gateway improvements on March 23rd. Public Notice of the project ran in both the Daily Journal of Commerce and the Tigard Times. The work detailed under the ITB consisted of the following: 1. Mobilization, Traffic Control, Erosion Control, Clearing and Grubbing 2. Excavation, Embankment, and Grading 3. Installation of Gateway Walls with Natural Stone Veneer Finish 4. Installation of Wall Drainage 5. Installation of Concrete Hardscape and Sidewalk. 6. Installation of Landscaping and Irrigation 7. Electrical Work including: Monument Lighting, Circuits, and Conduit, etc. 8. Performance of additional and incidental work as called for by the specifications and plans. Three bid schedules in the Invitation to Bid: 1. A Base Bid—Build the South Gateway only. 2. Alternate 1 —Build the North Gateway concurrent with the South Gateway. 3. Alternate 2 —Build the North Gateway 12 to 18 months after the South Gateway. The city asked for these alternatives to give flexibility into the construction schedule to allow for any funding issues that may have arisen. The ITB was clear to bidders that the city would determine low bidder based either on the Base Bid or Alternative 1,whichever the city had budget appropriation to complete depending on CCDA and Local Contract Review Board decisions. The closing date for the ITB was April 7th and the city received bids from three firms. The results of those bids are as follows: Base Bid Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Firm South Entryway Concurrent Build Phased Build Lee Contractors $171,400 $349,000 $361,400 Subcom Excavation, LLC $226,447 $454,147 $474,147 Paul Brothers, Inc. $233,323 $480,162 $516,433 Staff vetted these bids and has determined that Lee Contractors has submitted the lowest responsible bid for both the Base Bid and Alternative 1 On April 28, the bids were presented to the Local Contract Review Board (City Council) to get feedback on whether to proceed with the south gateway, both gateways at once, or a phased build. Another alternative was to reject all bids and re-scope the project for a more economical design (estimated costs to re-design$25,000 - $40,000.) The LCRB preferred to proceed with both gateways with the present design. The contract is scheduled to be awarded to Lee Contractors on May 26th. Costs 3 Art Borrello contract: $82,000, expended $70,000 Otani contract: $13,250, expended $11,800 Gateway design KLA contract: $33,100, expended $33,100 Total expended as of May 7, 2015: $114,900 Gateway Construction Lee Contracting: $349,000 Public Works internal costs: $21,000 KLA - construction management and spec modifications: $19,500 Total: $389,500 Estimated completed art and gateway grand total: $520,850 Public art public input CCDA Board briefings/presentations March 3, 2015 September 2, 2014 January 7, 2014 October 1, 2013 July 23, 2013 May 7, 2013 March 6, 2012 CCAC Briefings/presentations February 11, 2015 December 10, 2014 October 8, 2014 September 10, 2014 August 13, 2014 October 9, 2013 August 14, 2013 July 10, 2013 April 10, 2013 September 12, 2012 In addition, there were regular Public art Subcommittee liaison reports to CCAC 2011-13 Public art subcommittee meetings: December 12, 2013 July 8, 2013 4 March 27, 2013 (Vision meeting) December 10, 2012 October 17, 2012 March 21, 2012 January 18, 2012 November 16, 2011 October 19, 2011 5 AGENDA ITEM #7 City of Tigard Bid Tabulation Form Project:Tigard Entryway Monuments(CIP 2015-97024) Opening Date:April 7,2015 2:00 PM 31 Subcom Excavation& Lee Contractors Utilities LLC Paul Brothers,Inc Description Qty Unit Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Base Bid (South Entryway Monument) Mobilization 1 LS 11,400 $ 11,400.00 15,000 $ 15,000.00 25,360.78 $ 25,360.78 Traffic Control 1 LS 10,000 $ 10,000.00 12,000 $ 12,000.00 9,601.33 $ 9,601.33 Concrete&Masonry&Thermal& Moisture Protection 1 LS 79,000 $ 79,000.00 99,500 $ 99,500.00 97,570.38 $ 97,570.38 Concrete Forming and Acessories Concrete Reinforcing Cast-In-Place Concrete Pre Cast Architectural Concrete Unit Masonry Stone Masonry Veneer Electrical Work 11.5 26,000 $ 26,000.00 33,730 $ 33,730.00 33,834.07 $ 33,834.07 Earthwork&Utilities 1 LS 30,)00 $ 30,N)(00 41,217 $ 41,217.00 44,903.92 $ 44,903.92 Site Clearing Grading Excavation Trenching Fill Subdrainage Exterior Improvements 11.5 15,000 $ 15,000.0o 25,000 $ 25,000.00 22,052.68 $ 22,052.68 Underground Sprinklers I Seeding Planting Soil Plants Base Bid Total $ 171,400.00 $ 226,447.00 $ 233,323.16 Base Bid + Alternate 1 (North Entryway Monument) Mobilization 1 LS 25,000 $ 25,000.00 10,000 $ 10,000.00 44,941.66 $ 44,941.66 Traffic Control 1 LS 20,000 $ 20,000.00 15,500 $ 15,500.00 21,713.43 $ 21,713.43 Concrete&Masonry&Thermal& Moisture Protection 1 LS 165,000 $165,000.00 112,200 ###### 207,029.23 ###### Concrete Forming and Acessories Concrete Reinforcing Cast-In-Place Concrete Pre Cast Architectural Concrete Unit Masonry Stone Masonry Veneer Electrical Work 1 I'S 50,000 $ 50,000.00 31,000 $ 31,000.00 67,522.09 $ 67,522.09 Earthwork&Utilities 1 I'S 59,000 $ 59,000.00 39,000 $ 39,000.00 97,433.00 $ 97,433.00 Site Clearing Grading Excavation Trenching Fill Subdrainage Exterior Improvements 1 1,S 30,000 $ 30,000.00 20,000 $ 20,000.00 41,522.75 $ 41,522.75 Underground Sprinklers Seeding Planting Soil Plants Base Bid +Alternate 1 Total $ 349,000.00 $ 454,147.00 $ 480,162.16 AGENDA ITEM #8 Tigard City Center Development Agency t The 0tv ty'Hgaril's, Vrbarr l r}rrc�rr ct�'3 �t+rrc.a. COAD V M TO: Chair Arendes and the City Center Advisory Commission FROM: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager RE: Agenda Item 8: Strolling Street DATE: May 7, 2015 In 2013, the City of Tigard announced a new strategic plan and vision to become the most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest where people of all ages and abilities enjoy healthy and interconnected lives. Main Street is one of the city's best opportunities to create a true "strolling street:" a street that attracts pedestrians with a comfortable and safe walking experience, buildings with attractive facades and window displays, and areas of visual delight. The completion of the Main Street Green Street Phase I project has vastly improved the public realm of the southern half of Main Street. Walkers of all ages and abilities benefit from the improved streetscape. A Strolling Street matching grant program was proposed to improve privately owned areas between the sidewalk and building facade. Some of these areas have dead or dying landscaping and damaged paving. These spaces continue to detract from the pedestrian experience. In March, 2014 the Board of the CCDA approved the creation of the Strolling Street program and funding was included in the 2014-15 CCDA Budget. In July 2014, the Urban Renewal Improvement Programs Joint Committee developed criteria to review the criteria for awarding the Strolling Street grants. Applications were Applications were solicited from Main Street property and business owners in July and August; six applications were received. At its September meeting, the joint committee selected two projects to fund: 12430-12442 SW Main (Maki Sushi, Tigard Wine Crafters, and Elvia's Studio) and 12405 SW Main (Tigard Chiropractic). Staff and landscaping consultants, Greenworks, met with the property owners to discuss their goals, preferences and potential budgets. The consultants then developed alternatives for the property owners to choose from. There was some delay in the grant awardees finalizing their preferred plans due to personal circumstances; however, both projects are slated to be built in the next 1-2 months. The 12430-12442 SW Main Street project will be a significant project, with it being an approximately 1,100 square foot site. The project includes new paving and landscaping, a new pergola, a water feature and a seat wall. Final bids are being obtained by the property owner, but it is likely a $45-50,000 project,with the CCDA reimbursing 80%. The Tigard Chiropractic project (12405 SW Main) comprises of new landscaping and an irrigation system. Final bids are being obtained by the property owner, but it is an approximately $5,000 project,with the CCDA reimbursing 80%. The second round of Strolling Street applications will begin in July 2015. 2 I � ` + Xx ■ X X + X Q + II i�r GREEn 1 GtaanWOMa.P.C. 1 1 �V ruunro �..mu.�e.mn II •I �\I -------- IX ______________ EXISTING DOWN SPOUT OF OVERHANG �d IIY/ EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN _ 1 • =NN EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE, • �{� N REPLACE WITH NEW AUTOMATIC VALVE + XX XX + + + U_ X �... + _ X --- + +, - -X X X, o00.. �- �U 010 20 NORTH L—'a a r PLANTING LEGEND z Q TREES SHRUBS/GRASSES/PERRENIALS/GROUNDCOVER a 0 ACER PALMATUM'BUTTERFLV' �� II,/ G • BUTTERFLY MAPLE;10 GAL,SPACE AS SHOWN i = e — z HYDRANGEAQUERCIFOLIA MAHONIA X MEDIA p Z —C.LEAF HYDRANGEA;5 GAL.CONT„SPACE AS SHOWN MANONIA X MEDIA;B GAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN � DAPHNE X EDI WGODII'CAROL MACKIE' /II \\\ NANDINA DOMESTICA'PURPUREA NANA' m ' a O VARIEGATED HYBRID DAPHNE;I GAL.CONT.,SPACEASSHOWN COMPACT HEAVENLY BAMBOO;3 GAL.C I.,SPACE AS SHOWN E m J DRIMVS LANCED- RISES SANGUINEUM , h a NOTES: (:13 DR01 INPEPPER,5 GAL,CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN ■ RED FLOWERING CURRANT;5 GAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN w � 1. CON TRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOPSOIL,SOIL AMENDMENTS AND ECHN'ACEA PURPUREA Date:m"`exwww.ad/8/15 MULCH IN ALL PLANTING AREAS.TOPSOIL TO BE A 50150 BLEND OF PURPLE CONE FLOWER;1 GAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN COMPOST AND NATIVE TOPSOIL TOA DEPTH OF 8', THYMUS PSEUDOLANUGINUSUS Revisions: ESCALLONIA FRADESWPINK PRINCESS' WUOOLVTHYME;4 POT,8°U.C: 2 DETAILS PROVIDTS LBEINSRTOFTALLED IN DESIGN DACCORDANOCUMENT THE ESCALLONIA;5 GAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN DETAILS PROVIDED AS PART OFTHE DESIGN DOCUMENT PACKAGE. EIRATACY ANDS S RRIGATIONNSYSTEMS CONTRACTORTO BE FULLY TO ROVI ERIGATED SNOP DRAWINGS AN AUTOMATICM PA NESE BLLOOO GRASS;B GAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN �� FROM EXIST NG ELAN WINDSWEPT BASALT BOULDERS AND SALVAGED BOULDERS INDICATING PIPE AND HEAD LAYOUT ALONG WITH A SUBMITTAL ON Drawn By: BI ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. LIRIOPE MUSCARI Checked By: O BIGBLUELIRIOPE;2 GAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN 12'HIGH LANDSCAPEMOUNO Job No. 114105,1 4.BEE SHEET L2.0 FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION DETAILS. J Aoorovetl: L1.0 sheetn= NOTES: LINE SIZED GATE VALVE 1.LOCATION OF QUICK COUPLER IN QUICK COUPLER ASSEMBLY. VALVE BOX IS SHOWN FOR INSTALL PER DETAIL CLARIFICATION ONLY.INSTALL OFF-SET FROM MAINLINE. STANDARD VALVE BOX WITH 2.EXACT FITTING REQUIREMENTS, GREEN CV LOCKING LID COMPONENT SHAPES AND 301NCH LENGTH-COILED WIRE - SEQUENCE MAY DIFFER FROM THAT —7—SPECIFIED WATERPROOF SHOWN. WIRE CONNECTION -TOP OF BOX FLUSH IN LAWN)IT ---((L SH III III-Ii' ABOVE MULCH IN PLANTING BEDS VALVE I.D.TAG GREEn — g SPECIFIED CONTROL VALVE GtaanWwka.P.C. n _ VC.IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE IF UNION-EACH SIDE OF VALVE 4"XB"X18"GONG.BLOCK — (4)REQUIRED TYPICAL 6"MIN.314'WASHED ROUND ROCK V.C.MAINLINE NOT_USED NOT-USED AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY 1 O 1 J /sccnas umrosulE NOT AND OR MAXIMUM AD BE A FROMMINIMUM FINISH GRADE TOP OfBARI(MULCH NOTES: G> OF W ANO MAXIMUM R 3°FROM EDGE 3"MIN.FROM EDGE OF TRENCH, O OF WALK,PAVING,CURB,OR EDGER FINISH GRADE TOP OFNRFILAWN SLEEVES 24!'BGATION �PAVIN60R FOOTING L- EACH SIDE OF L.� EACH SIDE OF PAVING -� =ILII��ILIIVJ PAVING V ILII III _ OP-UP ROTOR HEAD ASSEMBLY ROOFING NAIL TO MARK SLEEVE CL FINISH GRADE ILII I�1- C U 11A)VIIII ml II\LIN 11111111\11111 IIIN\IWI11 - III PAVING SUBGRADE z z .V.C.SCHEDULE 80 NIPPLEV-1 — III-III SPECIFIED PIPE BACKFI-I .VG SCHEDULE 40 STREET ELL _OIFIED BACKFILL - LATERALLINE U)MAINLINE_ SPECIFIEDSLEEVECOMMONANDCONTROLWIRE V.C.SCHEDULE BONIPPLE,7"%8'MIN. 'I - (BUNDLE AT IO'INTERVALS) L-G =1 SPECIFIED PIPE BEDDING NOTE: LATERAL LINE - -III- PVC.SCHEDULE 40 STREET ELL 1. CON TRACTOR SHALL REPAIR TRENCH SETTLEMENT AND RESTORE LL VC.SCHEDULE 40 ELBOW OR TEE FINISH GRADES PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLANTING AREAS. a r 4 ROTOR HEAD-PVC SWING JOINT ASSEMBLY O 5 IRRIGATION SLEEVES UNDER PAVEMENTy TRENCHING IN PLANTING AREA z T V 12° 24' 0° 5'12° 2' c Z O Z EDGE OF PLANT BED OR ADJACENT PLANT0 J d SPECIFlEDPGRANIFACING.SEE PLANT al MASSING O SPACING DIAGRAM FOR LAYOUT -E' gUgL REQUIREMENTS Q Q �IF'�Ih AREA FOR PLANT SPACING ADJUSTMENT PLANT SPACING 0 SPECIFIED GROUND COVER-SEE .a m W CC Z / CONTINUOUS-OFPLANTING BED OVER SPACIPLANTNG REQUIRPLAN EMENTS LEGEND FOR SPECIFIED PLANING y Q a BROW EDUN EDGE OFEATED NBED.FOLLOW SPACING REQUIREMENTS / e BEDLINE ASDELINEATEDON THE PLANING GRADESET CR WN OF ROOTBALL 1"ABOVE FINISH PLAN LOCATE PLANTS ONE HALF OF BET CROWN OF GROUND COVER 712° GRADE a OFSPECI BEDIEDSPACADJDISTANCECENTFROM EDGE ABOVE FINISH P,ADE OF BEDLINE,OR SPACING PLAN MULCH FIN DEEP,SHREDDED FIR OR MULCH,SHREDDED FIR OR HEMLOCK BARI( MASSING,UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ' �HEMLOCK BARK Date d/8/15 FINISH GRADE Revisions. L5 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL \ �� \ FINISH GRADE `•�l\ e TRIANGULAR ON CENTER SPACING AS JJ\/ / yy� /�/ AMENDED BOIL-50%COMPOSTANO50% = TAM ENDED SOIL 4'DEPTH MINIMUM. a SPECIFIED ON PLANING PLAN / \ �\\\/�, NATIVE TOPSOIL. = I- AMENDED SOIL TO BE S%COMPOST AND a ,y 50%NATIVE TOPSOIL LOCATE PLANTS ONE HALF OF SPECIFIED �\ �\ \��\�y \\� COMPOST TO BE TESTED AND COMPLY // �/ //%TT //%T/� WITH REQUIREMENTS OF U9 - =IISSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PMD PR SPACING DISTANCE FROM ANYCURe, -� III a SIDEWALK,OR OTHER HARD SURFACE, �� =1II COMPOSTING COUNCIL. Drewn BV: &I BACKFILL SOIL MIXTURE-50%COMPOST I UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. III-IIS=III=IIIIIIIIIIII ROOTBALL DIAM.«24" 50%NATIVE TOPSOIL. Checked By: FOpy� �pJPY' JII 'IiEji 11 1-1 UNDISTURBED NADVESOIL IS SIDES&BOTiOM JOE Na. 1141051 EDGE OF PAVEMENT,CURB OR OTHER - -I UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL Aoorove8: HARD SURFACE COMPOST TO HE TESTED AN O COMPLY NG PLANT SPACING DIAGRAM GROUND COVER PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING-CONTAINER LZ.O PIAN NOTTo SOUS O SECTDN NOTT.— 9 SECTION 0 6'12" 24' sheet no. 2 of 2 -------- ---- � s _ -- i ] -- j BW MAIN STREET - I — Gram Wake,P.C. 1 — �rkw nw�san 10'-4" 5-0-0172' 73 T` I PA PA Y I • a a w - ---- - 5 PERGOWPOSFCONNECTION --- COMPUTERSKILLS PLUS e o • - 12448 FA 2 WF • ae•O _ I FIRST BANK OF TIGARD g C 12420 v/ R PA - a 3:0 .� T FFE 157.59 Q V 3 \ 3 � 4 L ELWA'S STUDIO12442 SALON I FFE 75].87 FFE 158.08 CD I TIGARD WINE CRAFTERS MAKI JAPANESE 1 I 11436 11470 �I L 0 2' 4' S'. NORTH Z MATERIALS LEGEND LAYOUT AND GRADING LEGEND GENERAL NOTES KEY NOTES a Q d UjZa 1. DO NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWINGS.THE LOCATION OF FEATURES NOT SPECIFICALLY O CONTRACT OR TO VERIFY SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG BACK OF EXISTING WALK AND ALONG c J a CONCRETE PAVING- - {` pIMENSION FINISH I:MEDIUM BROOM FINISH L3.0 OIMENSIONEOMAY NOT BEDETERMINED RRESOLU IF CONFLICTS ARISE IN FIELD, BUILDING WITHOUT EXCEEDING DING2 SLOPES ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE ° Q CONTACTOWNER'RE FROM OUTSIDE FOR RESOLUTION. BUILDING WITHOUT EXCEEDING 2%CROSS SLOPE. G Z 2.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM OUTSIDE OF BUILDINGS,PAVING,WALLS,CURBS,ETC. O m m W O Q D CONCRETEPAVING- L3.0 SECTION I ELEVATION REF. 3.ALL CURVED WALLS AND WALKS SHALL HAVE SMOOTH,CONTINUOUS CURVES AS Z 120 SOVARE FOOT PERGOLA.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ENGINGEERING AND SHOP FINISH 2:INTEGRAL COLORED CONCRETE XX INDICATED. DRAWINGS OF PERGOLA STRUCTURE AND COMPONENTS FOR REVIEW BY CITY. - } SEAPNALL a ® 4 4.CONTRACTORTO STAKE PAVING,SEAT WALLS,AND POS TS AND HAVE OWNER'S € ` �\ REPRESENTATIVE APPROVE STAKING PRIOR TO INSTALLING FORMWORK. O EXISTING GAS METER-PRESERVE AND PROTECT. a C J L3.0 ♦/ \i ALIGN 5.OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE FORMWORK FOR WALLS AND PAVEMENT PRIOR 'a i TO CONTRACTOR PLACING CONCRETE. EXISTING GRAPE VINE-PRESERVE AND PROTECT. WF WATERFEATURE 3 g314 6.CONTRACTOR TO REPORT LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER'S REP PRIOR TO PLACING ® L3.0 k� RADIUS DIMENSION FORMWORK. O NEW PAVEMENTTO MATCH FLUSH TO EXISTING GRADE OF SIDEWALK. /�5-6• PLANTING AREA-SEE SHEET L2.0 © EXISTING CURB AND SIDEWALK-PRESERVE AND PROTECT. Dats� 5/06/15Revislona: ARC DIMENSION O ] EXISTING STREET TREE TO REMAIN-PRESERVE AND PROTECT, XX WMI SPOT ELEVATION 2%MAX> SLOPE Drawn Bv. DS ABBREVIATIONS Checked Bv: BJ Job No. 114105.1 EG=EXISTING GRADE FG=FINISH GRADE AGoroveG: FS=FINISH SURFACE GRADE FFE=FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION L 1. BW=BOTTOM OF WALL TW=TOP OF WALL Sheetno. EXISTING THE TYP EXISTINGCURB:// SWMAINSTREET /� \ EXISTING SIDEWLAK GREEn + + 2y 1 Be-.P.C. i COMPUTER SKILLS PILUS \ XXXI1 1 tza4e \\I X 1 X X = %f X m N ` 1 N / + \+ \ \ 1 FIRSTBANKOFTIGARD 2420 ^ + \ + + V/ + + \ + � X j EXISTING GRAPE VINE O TO REMAIN Q U EXISTING GAS METER- PRESERVE B PROTECT ELMS STUDIO SALON 12442 V! EXISTING PINE TREE TO REMAIN RGARD W1NEC 124302436 ETERS MAK/124M SE L C_ D 10 20 40 NORTH m LL�'CCR a r L Z Q `tn J - a .0 PLANTING LEGEND NOTES: c 0 1. CON TRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOPSOIL,SOIL AMENDMENTS AND 0 Z TREES MULCH IN ALL PLANTING AREAS.TOPSOIL TO BE A 50/50 BLEND OF a COMPOST AND NATIVE TOPSOIL TO A DEPTH OF B. — Z EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN Q PRESERVE AND PROTECT 2 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE E m J DETAILS PROVIDED AS PART OF THE DESIGN DOCUMENT PACKAGE. m a 3.ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE FULLY IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC RRGATION SYSTEM. TORTO SHOP DRAWINGS DE SHRUBS/GRASSES/PERRENIALS/GROUNDCOVER NDICATINGPIEAND HEAD LLAAYOUTAONGWIITHASUBMITTAL ON ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. Date: 5/06/15 O CISNS X DANSEREAUPDECUMBENS' 4.SEE SHEET L3.I FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION DETAILS, Revisions: �-^-� DEC UM BENS ROCKROSE;5 GAL.CONT„SPACE AS SHOWN j 7 CORNUS SERICEA'KELSEYI' KELBEV DOGWOOD',SGAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN O LIRIOPE MUSCARI Drewn Bv: DS BIG BL UE LIRIOPE;2GAL CONT.,SPACERS SHOWN Checked By: B,I IRR EC PURPUREA Job No. 114105,1 PURPLECONE FLOWER;i GAL.COM.,SPACE AS SHOWN Aooroved: • _ �MAHONIAX ME0IAMEDIA /� MAHONIA X MEDIA;S GAL.CONT.,SPACE AS SHOWN I -/.O sheet no. X of % MEDIUM BROOM FINISH EXPANSION JOINT TOOLED SCORE JOINT 112"RECESSED SEALANT , TOOLED CONCAVE AND TIGHT TO CONCRETE SLAB REINFORCED WI6X6X10 BACKER ROD. EWWM 1/3 DEPTH.SEE SPECIFICATIONS ROUNDED POLYMER BACKER ROD - FOR FINISHES AND COLORS FINISH GRADE(�SIDEWALK WITH N080ND TO SEALPNT. 12'IN LAWN 114"RADIUS Q EDGE,TYR 12'PRE-MOLDED JOINT FILLER 112'IN SHRUB I GROUNDCOVER VERTICAL RESTRICTION AREAS (CURBMlALLpETC.) `° a GREEn I' q4 BAR HORIZ.CONTINUOUS � "° a • UNDISTURBED SUBGRADEOR FILL —III m -Y "£ \\ - ° °O' G—.kc. L COMPACTED PER III- I �^'N"� �'; '� 4 M1 SPECIFI C A T I ONS III—III III III III III—III —III III I III —III III III=III III=III— EXPANSION JOINT(LOCATE PER PLANS AND THICKEN EDGE OF PAVEMENT - —1111 WHEREADJACENT TO SOIL OR 12 AT ALL VERTICAL RESTRICTIONS). EXISTING PAVING COMPACTED GRANULAR BASE SPECIFIED ROCK RASE. SPECIFIED SUBGRADE CONCRETE PAVING � EXPANSION JOINT _ \ I /SELTpN x Z 4. B, (:2:)Srhm V 1• ]" 4• �/ NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CITY WITH COMPLETE SHOPDRAWINGSOF .Pr WATERFEATURE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.SHOP DRAWNGSTO INLCUDE REBAR LAYOUT,WATERFEATURE EQUIPMENT,AND LIGHTING DETAILS FOR CONSTRUCTION, L L 4 B TOP WATER FEATURE BASIN (6 T CANTED CONCRETE WEIR CAMED CONCRETE WEIR-7//"RADIUS AT NOSE L 78" 41 76" 2"X2"IPE BENCH SLATi LEDSTRIP LIGHT SYSTEM 1 6' 0 4' — 0 OV ", fllli 61111111 ll�}IIII ITlllrlih a v 2a4" � ami CAST IN IPLACE CONCRETE SEATWALL WATER FEATURE$W ITCHMANUk <O C► I► BOTTOM WATER FEATURE BASIN SUBMERSIBLE HARDWARE IN,12'STEE PIPE WITH BRASS WATER FEATURE PUMP 314'PJC CON LED SUBMERSIBLE FOUNTAIN LIGHT a A.ELEVATION INTAKE HOSE B.SECTION BY HYDREL ORAPPROVED EQUAL WATER FEATURE 2"BRAS DRAIN COVER 3 BY ZURN OR APPROVED EQUAL W PE V 3'fi" 1Y � (� .0 O 1 NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CITY WITH COMPLETE SHOP NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDECITI OF TIGARD WNH G u) DRAWINGS OF SEATWALL FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ENGINEERED SHOP DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS OF p J LED STRIP LIGHT SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS TO INLCUDE REBAR LAYOUT AND DETAIL FOR WOOD PERGOLA FOR STRUCTURAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL. ATTACH TO BOTTOM OF WOOD 3. 2t" BENCH CONSTRUCTION. A m m Q PER MANDE SPECIFICATIONS 2"X2"IPE BENCH SLATS 4"X4"TUBE STEEL PORT, : W CONCRETE WALL BEYOND, 2"%2"IPE BENCH SLAT POWDER COATED-MATTE BLACK m D BOOKENDS BLOCKOUT AT BOTH ENDS OF WALL - 8"AT BOTH ENDS e"X LD C STEEL PLATE r° 714"THICK METAL BENCH FRAME OF SEAT WALL WELD CONT.TO PORT, 1/4"THICK METAL BENCH FRAME POWDER COATED-MATTE BLACK 3"TYP Date: 5/06/15 CONCRETE BI. LED STRIP LIGHT SYSTEM 112"X 12"STEEL BOLTS PAVING FINISH GRADE ATTACH TO BOT TOM OF WOOD FINISH Revisions: PER MANUF.SPECIFICATIONS GRADE CONCRETE SEATWALL,BOARDFORM FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED FACES. 714 BARQ12°O,C.HORIZ.EA,FACE ------- -- ---------- - Drawn By:Y CONCRETE WALL r' ° a �' _ _ _ CONCRETE SEATWALL,BOARDFORM Checked Bv: ??? BOARDFORM FINISH ON ALL - n. ° - --- --- -- -- -----J FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED FACES. 24 JOE Na. 114105,1 EXPOSED FACES N4 BAR Q 18"O.C.VERT.EA.FACE YE' CONCRETE FOO TING Aoorovetl: A.SECTION ITCRUSHED GRAVEL BASE B.ELEVATION SEATWALL � 1 J POPOST CONNECTION L3.0 Y 0 fi, 12 6 s,x, 12' sheet nElm NOTE:INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTOR PER TOP OF BOX FLUSH IN LAWN NOTES: LINE SIZED GATE VALVE CODE AND REQUIREMENTS OF PREVAILING GATE VALVE(LINE SIZE)EACH I.LOCATION OF QUICK COUPLER IN QUICK COUPLER ASSEMBLY. JURISDICTIONS. SIDE VALVE BOX IS SHOWN FOR INSTALL PER DETAIL CLARIFICATION ONLY.INSTPLL VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING OFF-SET FROM MAINLINE. STANDARD VALVE BOX WITH III-III C0VER.TOP OF BOX 112'ABOVE 2,EXACTFITTING REOUIREMEMS, GREEN CV LOCKING LID ? - - MULCH IN PLANTING BEDS EXISTING WATER METER - � = COMPONENT SHAPESAND 301NCH LENGTH-COILED WIRE - III=' SEQUENCE MAV DIFFER FR OM THAT SPEC IFIEDWATERPROOF LI HE BRED GATE VALVE TYPICAL SYMBOL _-III SPECIFIED BACKFLOW SHOWN. WIRE CONNECPON III PREVENTION ASSEMBLY BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVIDE-WATTS 007, _ _ -TOP OF BOX FLUSH IN LAWN I IP? FEBCO 850 SERIES,OR APPROVED EQUAL ID - SPECIFIED MAINLINE TO ZONES `17 ILIIIII-11 ABOVE MULCH IN PLANTING BEES n FROM III .l /q II - UNION EACH SIDE _ } - VALVEID.TAG GREEn I� SOURCE �GATION -III --BOX EXTENSION M SYSTEM = u, = SUPPORTBLOCKS gZim SPECIFIED CONTROL VALVE Graanwmke.P.C. WPLL MOUNTED HOSE BIB.PLACE RECESSED III n� BRICK OR CONCRETE BLOC( ON BACK OF SEATWALL ADJACENT TO WATER VC.IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE 8'MIN.314"ROUND WASHED ^ 7LD FEATURE.HARDWARE TO BE RATED FOR _ UNION-EACH SIDE OF VALVE ROCK FREEZE PROTECTION. - _ _ _ _ ___- - I� 4"X8"X18"CO C.BLOC I -III-� -I I N K FLOW _ _ CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK (4)REQUIRED TYPICAL IRRIGATION SUPPLY FROM - III VMIN.314'WASHED ROUND ROCK METER P VC.MAINLINE POINT OF CONNECTION DIAGRAM BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY A 7 7 � T /PIAN NOfio$GNE � L /SFLIEN 0, q, B, 1fi, ` J /SLCn0.4 NOiNSGLE NOTE:AND OR MAXIMUM SHALL FROEA M EDGE FINISH GRADE TOP OF BARI(MULCH NOTES: N OF W AND MAXIMUM R 3'FROM EDGE 3"MIN.FROM EDGE Of TRENCH, OF WALK,PAVING,CURB,OR EDGER. FINISH GRADE-TOP OFNRFILAWN SLEEVES 24!'BGATION PAVING OR FOOTING 11\ SLEEVESE OF L EACH SIDE OF PAVING. - = = -� PAVING _ OP-UP ROTOR HEAD ASSEMBLY ROOFING NAIL TO MARK SLEEVE STCL FINISH GRADE _ C j I II III\LIN 1111111\11111 IIIA\IZAI = O - III PAVING SUBGRADE z�t2_ V.C.SCHEDULE 80 NIPPLE _ SPECIFIED PIPE BACKFILL-I .V.G 6CHEOULE 40 STREET ELL ? =_ BPEOIFIED BAOKFILL - LATERAL LINE ,^ -_ - v! MAINLINE L TTI - - -IIISPECIFIED SLEEVE - COMMONDCONTROL WIRE -I .V.C.SCHEDULE 80 NIPPLE,1"XB'MIN. - - ,I-III III- (BUNDLE AANT I0'INTERVALS) L LATERAL LINE =III=III SPECIFIED PIPE BEDDING NOTE: P.C.SCHEDULE 40 STREET ELL 1. CON TRACTOR SHALL REPAIR TRENCH SETTLEMENT AND RESTORE LL CC� -1 I- M.C.SCHEDULE 40 ELBOW OR TEE FINISH GRADES PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLANTING AREAS. a r L ROTOR HEAD-PVC SWING JOINT ASSEMBLY IRRIGATION SLEEVES UNDER PAVEMENT TRENCHING IN PLANTING AREA 4 S[Hn NOiiO G E 5 '1 P 5'12° 24' 6 SECn N 5 6 12" 24' Z f Zz 0 EDGE OF PLANT BED OR ADJACENT PLANT0 J d SPECIFlEDPLANTSPACING.SEE PLANT al MASSING O SPACING DIAGRAM FOR LAYOUT -E' gUgL all REQUIREMENTS Q Q �IF'�Ih AREA FOR PLANT SPACING ADJUSTMENT PLANT SPACING 0 SPECIFIED GROUND COVER-SEE .a w W CC Z CONTINUOUS-EQUALLYSPACEDONER PLANTING PLAN AND LEGEND FOR SPECIFIED PLANING y N Q ix a ROW AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED.FOLLOW SPACING REQUIREMENTS ASPLANT ONEHALPLBET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1"ABOVE FINISH BEDLINE DE PLAN LEAS ELINEAT DO HALE F PLANTING SETCR0WN OF GROUND C0VER 112' GRADE " a OF BEDIEOSPACADJACENT PLANT EDGE OF ABOVE FINISH P,ADE w ` OF BEDLINE,OR SPACING DISTANCE IS A PLANT MULCH-2'DEEP,SHREDDED FIR OR MULCH,SHREDDED FIR OR HEMLOCK SARI( MASSING UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ' �HEMLOCK BARK Date: 5/06/15 FINISH GRADE Revisions. L 5 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL f�,{JLC `•�l JJAMENDED SOIL-4"DEPTH MINIMUM. \ \ AMENDED 50%COMPOST AND _ -j AMENDED SOIL TO BE 53%COMPOST AND TRIANGULAR ON CENTER SPACING A& \/ /yy yy = SPECIFIED ON PLANTING PLAN \ �\\\\ NATIVE TOPSOIL. -III- - a 50%NATIVE TOPSOIL LOCATE PLANTS ONE HALF OF SPECIFIED �y/ WITH COMPOST TO BE TESTED AND COMPLY SPACING DISTANCE FROM ANYCURe, // �/ //:/ �/ //%T/��/�}, WITH REQUIREMENTS OF U9 = � �SCAR!FYSIOES AND BOTTOM OF PRAM PR s a SIDEWALK,OR OTHER HARD SURFACE, -IIS =5 �_ �-IIIII -IIIIII= � -,? COMPOSTING COUNCIL. Drawn Bv: yt BACKFILL SOIL MIXTURE-50%COMPOST I UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IIIIII=III_III VIII ROOTBALL)AM.t2q^ 50%NATIVE TOPSOIL. Checked Bv: ??? Fpp� �OVPY JII II-III III-III=I UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL SCARIFY SIDES&BOTTOM JOE Na. 1??? a EDGE OF PAVEMENT,CURB OR OTHER - I-I I UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL Aoorovetl: HARD SURFACE COMPOST TO HE TESTED AN O COMPLY LNG PLANT SPACING DIAGRAM GROUND COVER PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING-CONTAINER L3.1 / F,Ax NCTTCscuE O sscTox NOTTo ., .7 SECTION 5 5.12, 24, sheet no. X of %