Ordinance No. 15-12 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 2015- Lc*a
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING THREE (3) PARCELS OF LAND TOTALLING
APPROXIMATELY 1.54 ACRES,APPROVING THE ROSACKER ANNEXATION (ZCA2015-
00001) AND WITHDRAWING PROPERTY FROM THE WASHINGTON COUNTY
ENHANCED SHERIFF'S PATROL DISTRICT AND WASHINGTON COUNTY URBAN
ROADS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT. A N D ?i 6 A R D WA-TE-P- J71 S T2/e-7
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is authorized by ORS 222.120(4)(b), ORS 222.125, and ORS
222.170(1) to annex contiguous territory upon receiving written consent from owners of land in the
territory proposed to be annexed;and
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is authorized by ORS 222.120(5) and 222.520 to withdraw property
which currently lies within the boundary of the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District
and Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District upon completion of the annexation; and
WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on July 14,2015,to consider the annexation
of three (3)parcel Washington County Tax Map (WCTM) 2S104BC,Tax Lots 300,400,& 500 of land
located on SW Fern Street, and withdrawal of said parcels from the Washington County Enhanced
Sheriffs Patrol District and Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District;and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Metro 3.09, ORS 222.120 and 222.524,notice was given and the City held a
public hearing on the issue of the annexation into the City and on July 14,2015;and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 222.524, the City must declare the withdrawal of the annexed property
from the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District and Washington County Urban Roads
Maintenance District;and
WHEREAS, the Tigard Development Code states that upon annexation, the zone is automatically
changed to the City zoning which most closely implements the City's comprehensive plan map
designation or to the City designations which are the most similar;and
WHEREAS, the annexation has been processed in accordance with the requirements of Metro 3.09
and has been reviewed for compliance with the Tigard Community Development Code and the
Comprehensive Plan and the annexation substantially addresses the standards in Metro 3.09 regulating
annexations;and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has carefully considered the testimony at the public hearing and
determined that withdrawal of the annexed property from the applicable service districts is in the best
interest of the City of Tigard.
NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE No. 15- //Z
Page 1
SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council hereby annexes the subject parcels as described and shown in
the attached Exhibits "A" and"B",and withdraws said parcels from the Washington
County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District and Washington County Urban Roads
Maintenance District.
SECTION 2: The Tigard City Council adopts the "Staff Report to the City Council' (ZCA20015-
00001) as findings in support of this decision; a copy of the staff report is attached
hereto as Exhibit"C"and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 3: City staff is directed to take all necessary measures to implement the annexation,
including filing certified copies of the Ordinance with Metro for administrative
processing, filing with state and county agencies as required by law, and providing
notice to utilities.
SECTION 4: Pursuant to ORS 222.120(5), the effective date of the withdrawal of the property from
Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District and Washington County
Urban Roads Maintenance District shall be the effective date of this annexation.
SECTION 5: In accordance with ORS 222.180, the annexation shall be effective upon filing with
the Secretary of State.
PASSED: By jl/fQ jA26KS vote of all Council members present after being read by number
and title only,this l�/'`� day of , 2015.
7��rrP ,�iias,
Carol A. Krager, City Recorde
APPROVED: By Tigard City Cound this Z`L day of ,2015.
%bT)i tl
P.1711 VAN"
Approved as to form: John0,(Y(X,Mayor
City Attorn
-:it-IIg I I
Date
ORDINANCE No. 15-
Page 2
cl�
�` 2S 1 04BC 2S 1 04BC
�� *s ``.7anrw rw ww w " Aw ,sv 9i1 i
r�� p ,ww Hr• OJQ` :�� t' ✓• •nry
WIND.40NG rwC;^.,a 42
r ,a•` a sw -M" +, „♦ ?tt s ° •t •.
srwr 'APR 7 2015 w. w rr ,a„ w,. •ti.w ww r. -"'••-n .ct ' 6 wr s. w'r ww
r �7j `by swr
+Ian a�R TM{= p I.p� e•: a"'r w.a "" ww ..a
' k*f l•�A tIIY C! TWRD "" •wt"r• •r+ wr w"wrrN . ww •u• ww •e w a I •�� r x t tl `
F�4ININGIENGINE�iflG i �t -
y'ti Vi b. NNe 3= 1 A I L rL r rr ,.11Ht..•:,..tw.i.-. .....lR'r a + L lar ■.,. ,.. ,rw
jj +��,,,,�� Nm 7ppp r11ia
~i so 'Ot'tr E i jNt `rl or.- 1 1 r
Q •• xN + J t4 700 rr rw r•r rw ^s,r mr
4p ! 3,�,w■ ww rr vw rr r ,.r rr
aa
• cv
°+ ig9p am + SW A �� WALNUT w. LANE t .r■e ..r wa.`ori'
� ` y �' ♦^ a C y 1 37 IN N 1 Iei '1
n DT1 7tu00� 7Noj 0"1$° j"tov
.� ww! 9 s "^ VWASHINGTON COUNTY ONEGONwr - re rw ow a i ! 1 .wSW174 i1W1/48ESTIDN 04T28 R1WWJe.
r- G+t tM �'+ ww ,c [ i ,ws 'WALK V-IW
n a"0 „ 111tH co ^+ 0 e isS ■ 7p0 r •:%. «w •nw ry ti, ■ 4 , .e
pj
71l.er C t s 9Nt•'4 -' 1 ° rr , fa v 77 a re a ra v
-1
-78_
�Z�ts.r.�
Q frrr�'�.■ leoco•t
�• t ''' •` - - ti` 4
xa
as x 27 x as ao
•l 46 4J 3 1„ ' r.. =1y G N f 10'70' , 1100 yu. a. x a/ u b a' x x of
C s
w
•;r t to
STREET -. w' ' ,,,• •••� ay - w•r roRAoar7oftictpfa■wouRwrwrrrA7
f 5 Np0 ■ A wwwaawrMlelwa«.w
a.
Lu
rr err :.r} J AD
fill 0
27 >t N M
'R' r a 1000 •I i -'•r
.F ,ww r.r 4 51-7a C✓ wr .?i ��r
wrH taco iia t« Be BD AC AD
•. u 3a $ t ` ; `:!` •c� 1100 low nr SECTION 04
r 1 �C rac t
UER
wr ~rw!�' a - %91 -78
CI d w M
��. CT �f • � 1 L y uoo i t ,.■.■ ,.0, ... .,,, e C o
20
• 51.7_ 'a : 51-78 �+ ..^ .; .rr 5,�
ft, of ':" ; 77
„ a 3 t a= a �r � 8'
• �' e _ V. ,�0 0 a -„ V V w r. .� a r� F ; C&%*WTs*MFw. as MW
2 � � ■ s a. 1f1 2t wa7wAea7e■A,pAaw.w■■arla7wlwla
w t ^ R • am ■ noc $ ra,ac f�/�1
. i M W F m Go ; '■0° ; •i°De j p'o E R ww ANNEXATION CERTIFIED BY
arm ».� i gw«H a, '- WASHINGTON COUNTY
L '�^1•t- '� I=- ti. CARTOGRAPHY
'•� /y1`t a pp ; 1 1�7 ' 4/2212015
tt �•-.a•�N r-rt CID �'r• w.. wn law e a*WIDN LC727
q00 • 7 t i pY00 V. .�-1 C7 aeu r.•r
N p00 b S• r .w _�
(Wa2 tf.c • 1 � � 9 Dr• r `rieo p{ '�'�.�frn��4«i tl ■ � � r aw a
+ �`,w�.r � • �� ltfbe ; ■ Ileo + ;r W ofwvwtAVr a �� C�AR7C�GRAP�IY
t •� t ' 1 9 Io o t $7 1 r i t�fes» am A �, y -S am
7t ,.w... :. .mow. _�`B � .. ..,r.!. ..-^✓ +'.: t �0 pm �1 e:� '', •OT DATE:June 18,2014 m
t s 09/tip t �1 ^- +p8� ^r� qa; . .... +ar.....,...r � rr n. _ O
rr - w gg +pg
L : H r< a ".wy..• w ww ORASY- NOTRELYrONts =
y J•�F 7wrerl■ • 1LS y 9 •• 7 `f .•. ... FOR OTHER USE
N 0�
1• w�.r ! a•ry a• � t ."a4 • 9 �-« N7 "..",� t AwMre,wr �'a+ i
err •'w-31 12^"r'-r 1 g Ot•( i' www„w c..rmr•.r.;-.rs,,..:-..ww..-..rr-..•....a..-...y•.u.a.ervwna.•�ro
-r n Q
f. 12siv V N Z
No a ' #1 -1
' t t .�.a � .. w ,.r N•.si � �
6 � � � 4��w�'+■�ti R la7ac +
CD :�� r3..t T••cn• 74 x ' TIGARD
2S 1 048C 2S 1 04BC
Exhibit B
Legal description for annexation
Lot 9, Handy Acres,a subdivision in the Northwest quarter of Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1
West,Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and the State of Oregon.
ANNEXATION CERTIFIED
BY
APR 2 2 2015
WASHINGTON COUNTY A& T
CARTOGRAPHY
Exhibit C
Hearin Date: JuLy 14 2015 Time: 7:30 PM
STAFF REPORT TO THE
CITY COUNCIL e
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
120 DAYS = N/A
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: ROSACKER ANNEXATION
CASE NO: Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) ZCA2015-00001
APPLICANT: William Rosacker
401 Kemper Crest Dr.
Newberg,OR 97132
OWNER 1: William&Rhonda Rosacker OWNER 2: Josh&Jennifer Loesche
401 Kemper Crest Dr. 14065 SW Fern St.
Newberg,OR 97132 Tigard,OR 97223
PROPOSAL: A request to annex appproximately three parcels totaling approximately 1.50 acres into
the city of Tigard. The site is located on the north side of S)X' Fern Street within a
7.79 acre island of unincorporated Washington County properties.
LOCATION: 14033 SAX'Fern Street;WCTM 2S104BC,Tax Lot 300
14047 SVX'Fern Street;W'CTM 2S104BC,Tax Lot 400
14065 SW Fern Street;WCI11I 2S104BC,Tax Lot 500
COUNTY ZONE: R6: Residential, 5 units/acre minimum density, 6 units/acre maximum density.
The purpose of the R-6 District is to implement the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan for areas designated for residential development at no more than six (6) units
per acre and no less than five (5) units per acre, except as specified by Section 300-
2, Section 300-5, or Section 303-6. The intent of the R-6 District is to provide the
opportunity for more flexibility in development than is allowed in the R-5 District.
EQUIVALENT
CITY ZONE: R-7: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-7 zoning district is designed to
accommodate attached single-family homes, detached single-family homes with or
without accessory residential units, at a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet, and
duplexes, at a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Mobile home parks and
subdivisions are also permitted outright. Some civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: The approval standards for annexations are described in Community Development
Code Chapters 18.320 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goal 1.1, Goal 11.1 Policy
4), Goal 11.3 (Policy 6), and Goal 14.2 (Policy 1-4); ORS Chapter 222; and Metro
Code Chapter 3.09.
ROSACKER ANNEXLMON
ZC N2015-00001 PAGE 1 OF 8
SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council find that the proposed annexation (ZCA2015-00001) meets all
the approval criteria as identified in ORS Chapter 222, Metro Code Chapter 3.09, Community
Development Code Chapters 18.320 and 18.390, and the following Comprehensive Plan Goals and
Policies: Goal 1.1; Goal 11.1, Policy 4; Goal 11.3, Policy 6; and Goal 14.2, Policy 1-4. Therefore,staff
recommends APPROVAL of ZCA2013-00002 by adoption of the attached ordinance.
SECTION III BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The 1.50 acre annexation site is made up of three parcels located on the north side of SW Fern Street.
Bordered by the City of Tigard on three sides, the site is within a 7.79 acre "island" of unincorporated
Washington County. The two northern parcels (tax lots 300 and 400) are vacant, and the
applicant/owners are requesting annexation for future development. That development is not part of this
proposal. The third parcel (tax lot 500) is developed with a single-family home on septic.
Utilities are available in the area and can be extended to serve the site. Current Washington County zoning
of the property is R-6; equivalent city zoning will be R-7. Properties to the east are zoned R-6. Properties
to the north, south and west are within the City of Tigard and are zoned R-12 (PD),R-7,& R-7(PD).
SECTION IV APPLICABLE CRITERIA, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
City: Community Development Code Chapters 18.320 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Goal 1.1; Goal
11.1 (Policy 4),and Goal 11.3 (Policy 6), Goal 14.2 (Policies 1-4).
State: ORS Chapter 222
Regional:Metro Code Chapter 3.09
A CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE(TITLE 18)
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent %ith the relevant portions of the Community
Development Code based on the following findings:
Chapter 18.320.020.B: Approval Process and Standards.
Approval Criteria. The decision to approve, approve with modification, or deny an application to
annex property to the City shall be based on the following criteria:
1.All services and facilities are available to the area and have sufficient capacity to provide service
for the proposed annexation area;
The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan's Public Facilities and Services Chapter states that for the
purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, public facilities and services refer to stormu*ater management,water
supply and distribution,wastewater management, community facilities, and private utilities. In addition the
comprehensive Plan Glossary includes public safety,parks, and transportation. All services are a�ailable to
the proposed annexation site and have adequate capacit} to serve existuig and future development.
Water—City of Tigard/Tigard Water District. The property lies within the Tigard Water Service Area.
The applicant states that the site can be served by an existing 6-inch water main in Fern Street. The
existing home on tax lot 500 is already served by this line. There is adequate capacity to serve future
homes on the vacant parcels.
Sewer—City of Tigard. City sanitary and storm is available at the property line of the two undeveloped
parcels (tax Tots 300 and 400) through a public easement that runs along the site's northwest boundary.
The applicant proposes to extend the public sewer lines 170 feet to the eastern boundary of the site and
Ferna sanitary lateral for tax lot 500 for future connection. The site slopes down to the north from
Fern Street. There is no sewer in Fern Street. Based on information supplied to the applicant by the City
of Tigard Public Works Department,there is adequate capacity to serve the future homes.
ROSACKER ANNEXATION
ZCA2015-00001 PAGE 2 OF 8
Streets—City of Tigard Engineering Division. The subject property-is located on SW Fern Street. The
pproposed annexation will not affect this access. Future homes will have access to SW Fern Street;
however, the applicant will plan for the possible future extension of SW Walnut Lane through the site.
The properties are within the Washington County- Urban Road Maintenance District andwill be removed
from the district upon annexation.
Police — City of Tigard Police Department. Police services are currently provided by the Washington
County Sheriff. If approved, the property will be withdrawn from the Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District.
Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposed annexation and has no objections.
Fire —Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R). The sub'ect property is in Tualatin Valley Fire and
Rescue's (I'VF&R's) service area. The TN'F&R District currenX provides services to site, which will not
change following annexation. The Fire District has personnel and equipment in the area that can respond
to an emergency incident and implement such actions as may be necessary for fire and/or rescue
operations.
Parks—City of Tigard. There is an existing public open space on Fern Street near the proposed
annexation site. The annexation and development of this property will not adversely impact the city's
ability or capacity, to provide parks. System Development Charges for Parks will be collected for any
future homes constructed on the site.
CONCLUSION: Based upon this review, staff finds that all public services and facilities (as defined by
the Comprehensive Plan) are available to the proposed annexation territory and have sufficient capacity to
provide service. The proposed annexation will not reduce the level of services within the City of Tigard.
This criterion is met.
2. The applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and implementing ordinance provisions have
been satisfied.
FINDINGS: The following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies apply to the proposed annexation:
Goal 1.1; Goal 11.1, Policy 4; Goal 11.3, Policy 6; and Goal 14, Policy 1- 4. Staff has determined that the
proposal has satisfied the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies based on the following findings:
Goal 1.1: Citizen Involvement. The City shall provide citizens, affected agencies and other
jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process.
The City maintains an ongoing citizen involvement program. To assure citizens x;U be provided an
opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process, the City provides notice for Type IV
land-use applications. The City posted, mailed and published notice of the public hearing as follows. The
City posted the hearing notice at four public places on June 23, 2015: Tigard Library, Tigard City Hall,
Tigard Permit Center, and at the sub)ject property on 14033/14047/14065 SW Fern Street. The City
published notice of the hearing in The Ti,gard Times for two successive weeks Quly 2 and July 9, 2015) prior
to the July 14, 2015, public hearing. The City- also mailed notice to all interested parties and surrounding
property owners within 500 feet on July 22,2015.
Goal 11.1: Public Facilities and Services.
Policy 4. The City shall require the property to be located within the city limits prior to receiving
City stormwater services.
Stormwater service will be provided by the City but lines will not be extended until the two northern
parcels are developed. Drainage will be directed to the north away from SW Fern Street. A downstream
analysis will be necessary as part of the subdivision application to determine what improvements must be
provided by the applicant to accommodate the increased stormwater.
Goal 11.3: Public Facilities and Services.
Policy 6. The City shall require the property to be located within the city limits prior to receiving
City wastewater services.
ROSACKER ANNEXr MN
ZCA2015-00001 PAGE 3 OF 8
City of Tigard sanitary service is available along the northwest boundary of the site and can be extended to
serve all three parcels. Future public sanitary lines within the proposed subdivision will be owned and
maintained by the City of Tigard. The applicant will not receive City services prior to annexation.
Goal• 14.2. Implement the Tigard Urban Services Agreement through all reasonable and necessary
steps,including the appropriate annexation of unincorporated properties.
Policy 1. The City shall assign a Tigard zoning district designation to annexed property that most
closely conforms to the existing Washington County zoning designation for that property.
The applicable Tigard zoning district designations are addressed below in the findings for Section
18.320.020.C.
Policy 2. The City shall ensure that capacity exists, or can be developed, to provide needed urban
level services to an area when approving annexation.
Capacity has been addressed above,consistent with this policy.
Policy 3. The City shall approve proposed annexations based on findings that the request:
A. can be accommodated by the City's public facilities and services; and
The availability of the City's public facilities and services has been addressed above, consistent with this
policy.
B. is consistent with applicable state statute.
As reviewed in this report, staff finds that the provisions of ORS 222 have been met, consistent with this
policy.
Policy 4. The City shall evaluate and may require that parcels adjacent to proposed annexations
be included to: A) avoid creating unincorporated islands within the City; B) enable public services
to be efficiently and effectively extended to the entire area; or C) implement a concept plan or
sub-area master plan that has been approved by the Planning Commission or City Council.
The subject site lies within a 7.79 acre island of unincorporated Washington County made up of seven (7)
parcels. The proposal will result in three of those parcels being annexed to the city. Prior to submittal the
applicant approached the property owners within the island to join the annexation. Only one neighboring
property owner joined the application. In addition, the Cite sent invitations to adjacent owners to loin the
annexation but did not receive an), responses. Elimination of the unincorporated island is not possible at
this time;however,the proposal does shrink the size of the island to 6.29 acres.
CONCLUSION: Annexation of additional parcels is not necessary- at this time. The city has coordinated
,%ith allJurisdictions and agencies within/near the annexation site. The City of Tigard has the
services/facilities available and at adequate capacity to serve the site. The proposed annexation is
consistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. This criterion is met.
Chapter 18.320.020.0
Assignment of comprehensive plan and zoning designations.
The comprehensive plan designation and the zoning designation placed on the property shall be
the City's zoning district which most closely implements the City's or County's comprehensive
plan map designation. The assignment of these designations shall occur automatically and
concurrently with the annexation. In the case of land which carries County designations, the City
shall convert the County's comprehensive plan map and zoning designations to the City
designations which are the most similar.
FINDINGS: All of the subject property is currently zoned R-6 (Washington County). This zone is
intended for residential development at no more than 6 units per acre and no less than 5 units per acre.
Table 18.320.1 in the TDC summarizes the conversion of the County's plan and zoning designations to
City designations which are most similar. According to this table, the City designation most similar to R-6
is R-7 zoning.
ROSACKER ANNEXATION
ZCA2015-00001 PAGE 4 OF 8
CONCLUSION: Upon annexation the property will be zoned R-7, which most closely implements
Washington County s comprehensive plan and zoning designations (R-6). This criterion is met.
Chapter 18.390.060• Type IV Procedure
Annexations are processed by means of a Type IVprocedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390 of the
Community Development Code (Title 18) using standards of approval contained to 18.390.020.B, which
were addressed in the previous section. Chapter 18.390 requires City Council to hold a heang on an
annexation. It also requires the City to provide notirice at least 20 days prior to the hearing by mail and to
publish notice at least 10 business days prior to the hearing; the City mailed notice on June 23, 2015, and
Y hshed public notice in The Tigard Times for two successive weeks Quly 2 &July 9, 2015) prior to the
14,2013 public hearing.
Additionally, Chapter 18.390.060 sets forth five factors for consideration when making a Type IV
decision:
1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter
197;
FINDINGS: The city's Compprehensive Plan has been acknowledged by the Land Conservation and
Development Commission to be in compliance with state planning goals and as reviewed above, the
annexation proposal is consistent with Tigard Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
CONCLUSION: Theproposal is consistent with the city's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan.
Therefore, the proposal complies with statewide planning goals,including citizen involvement,public
facilities,transportation, and urbanization.
2.Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable;
FINDINGS:
ORS 222:
State law (ORS 222.120(4)(b), ORS 222.125 and ORS 222.170(1)) allows for a city to annex contiguous
territory when owners of landd m the proposed annexation territory submit a petition to the legislative body of
the city. In addition, ORS 222.111(2) allows for a ci to act on its own motion to annex contiguous
territory. A city is not required to hold an election or such an annexation if it follows the noticing
procedures for a public hearing per ORS 222.120.
ORS 222.120 requires the city to hold a public hearing before its legislative body (City Council) and
provide public notice to be published once each week for two successive weeks prior to the da} of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, and shall cause notices of the hearing to be
posted in four public places in the city for the same two week period.
The owners of the subject parcels have signed a petition for annexation to the City. The site is contiguous
to the City's boundary. The City mailed notice on June 23, 2015,and published public notice in The Tigard
Times for two successive weeks Quly 2 &July 9, 2015) prior to theJuly 14, 2015 public hearing and posted
the hearing notice for public view on June 23, 2015 in the Tigard Library, Tigard City Hall, Tigard Permit
Center, and at the site on SAX/Fern Street.
CONCLUSION: Staff finds that the provisions of ORS 222 have been met.
3.Any applicable METRO regulations;
Chapter 3.09 of the Metro Code (Local Government Boundary Changes) includes standards to be
addressed in annexation decisions, in addition to local and state review standards. Staff has reviewed the
Metro regulations for Local Government Boundary Changes and addressed the applicable regulations
(Metro Code 3.09.045(d) & (e) and 3.09.050)below:
ROSACKER ANNEXATION
ZCA2015-00001 PAGE 5 OF 8
FINDINGS:
Metro 3,09.045 (d)and (_e))
The proposed annexation is not being reviewed through an expedited process, but subsections (d) of
Metro Code 3.09.050 requires that the standards of 3.09.045 (d) & (e) be addressed.
(d)To approve a boundary change through an expedited process,the city shall:
(1) Find that the change is consistent with expressly applicable provisions in:
(A)Any applicable urban service agreement adopted pursuant to ORS 195.065;
The Tigard Urban Service Agreement (TUSA) is between the City, County, Metro, and the service
Districts for water, sewer, transportation, parks and public safety. The agreement outlines the role,
provision, area, and planning/coordination responsibilities for service providers operating in the Tigard
Urban Services Area. These services are addressed above at the beginning of this report.
The Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) between the City and the County provides coordination of
comprehensive planning and development, defines the area of interest, and includes policies with respect
to the active planning area and annexation. The applicable annexation policies include the assignment of
comprehensive plan and zoning designations addressed earlier in this report and acknowledgements that
the City is the ultimate service provider of urban services within the Tigard Urban Service Area.
The City has followed all processing and notice requirements in the LIPAA providing notice to
Washington County. The agreement states that "so that all properties within the Tigard Urban Service
Area will be served by the City,the Count} and Cit} will be supportive of annexations to the City."
(B)Any applicable annexation plan adopted pursuant to ORS 195.205;
These statutes outline the process for annexations initiated by a city or district, including public hearings
and voting procedures. This statute is not applicable since the annexation was initiated by the property
owner. The applicant has submitted a petition to annex signed by both property owners. There are no
registered voters at the site.
(C) Any applicable cooperative planning agreement adopted pursuant to ORS 195.020(2) between
the affected entity and a necessary party;
ORS195.020(2) speaks to cooperative agreements between counties or Metro with each special district that
provides an urban service within the boundaries of the county or the metropolitan district. Special
districts would include fire, water, school, and sewer districts. These districts are the same within the
county and city with the exception of the sewer district, which will be the City of Tigard following
development of the subdivision. Planning for these areas will still be considered by the same special
districts upon annexation due to existing agreements with the City.
(D) Any applicable public facility plan adopted pursuant to a statewide planning goal on public
facilities and services; and
The City of Tigard Public Facility Plan was adopted in 1991 in compliance with statewide planning goals
and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-11. A revised plan is currently being developed as part ofperiodic
review. New Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for public facilities were adopted in 2008 (Goal 11),
and the applicable goals and policies were addressed previously in this report. The proposed annexation is
consistent with the Tigard Public Facility Plan.
(E)Any applicable comprehensive plan; and
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan applies in this case. Applicable policies are satisfied as addressed
previously in this report.
ROSACKER ANNEXAMN
ZCA2015-00001 PAGE 6 OF 8
(2) Consider whether the boundary change would: (A) Promote the timely, orderly and economic
provision of public facilities and services; (B) Affect the quality and quantity of urban services;
and (C) Eliminate or avoid unnecessary duplication of facilities or services.
The proposed annexation will allow urban services to be provided to the site for existing and future homes
and to future urban development on the sites to the east that may annex in the future. In addition,Tigard
Police will serve the site instead of Washington County Sherriff. TVF&R will continue to provide service
as it is a county-wide provider.
(e)A city may not annex territory that lies outside the UGB,except it may annex a lot or parcel
that lies partially within and outside the UGB. Neither a city nor a district may extend water or
sewer services from inside a UGB to territory that lies outside the UGB.
The property to be annexed is not outside the UGB. This criterion is not applicable.
Metro 3.09.050 (b)
(b) Not later than 15 days prior to the date set for a change decision, the approving entity shall
make available to the public a report that addresses the criteria in subsection (d) below, and that
includes at a minimum the following:
The staff report was available June 29, 2015,fifteen days prior to the public hearing.
(1) The extent to which urban services presently are available to serve the affected territory
including any extra territorial extensions of service;
As addressed previously in this report, urban services are available and can be extended to the affected
territory.
g2) Whether the proposed boundary change will result in the withdrawal of the affected territory
om the legal boundary of any necessary parry; and
The proposed territory will remain within Washington County but will be required to be withdrawn from
the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District and Urban Road Service District upon
completion of the annexation. This withdrawal is incorporated into the proposed ordinance.
(3)The proposed effective date of the boundary change.
The public hearing will take place July 14, 2015. If the Counciladopts findings to approve ZCA2015-
00001, the effective date of the annexation will be upon filing with the Secretary of State office per Oregon
Revised Statutes (ORS 222.180).
(c) The person or entity proposing the boundary change has the burden to demonstrate that the
proposed boundary change meets the applicable criteria.
The proposed boundary change meets the applicable criteria as demonstrated in this staff report.
(d) To approve a boundary change, the reviewing entity shall apply the criteria and consider the
factors set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of Section 3.0.045.
The criteria and factors outlined in subsections (d) and (e) of Section 3.09.045 have been previously
addressed in this report.
CONCLUSION: As shown in the above findings the proposed annexation satisfies the Metro Code
regulations related to Local Government Boundary Changes.This criterion is met.
ROSACKER ANNEXATION
ZCA2015-00001 PAGE 7 OF 8
(Tigard CDC 18.390.060 continued)
4.Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and
FINDINGS: Findings addressing the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies were provided previously in
this report.
CONCLLTSION: As previously demonstrated, the proposed annexation is consistent with all applicable
comprehensive plan policies.
5.Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances.
FINDINGS: Resolution 13-08 extended previously approved incentives for property owners that
voluntarily annex into the city limits for reasons that do not include the need for city services. These
incentives include waiver of the annexation application fee, assistance with paperwork and, phasing in of
increased property taxes. Because the annexation is needed to serve the site for future development, these
incentives cannot be extended to the applicant. As demonstrated in previous sections of this report, the
proposed annexation is consistent with all other applicable provisions of the Tigard Development Code.
CONCLUSION: Based upon the findings above, all applicable provisions of the city's implementing
ordinances are satisfied
SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Representatives of City of Tigard Police and Public Works reviewed the proposal and had no
objections.
SECTION VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
The City mailed notice to surrounding property owners within 500 feet. No written public comments
were received as of June 24, 2015.
June 24.2015
PREPARED BY: Cheryl Caines DATE
Associate Planner
i
June 24,2015
REVIEWED BY: Kenna-Asher DATE
Community Development Director
ROSACKER ANNFX-knON
ZCA2015-00001 PAGE 8 OF 8