Planning Commission Packet - 08/03/1976 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
„ ..,._�w,.. , ,_.. , _.. .... .,»_.... ._. ,... .�,. . ,. .... . ... _.� �.., .,..,_.w.,._., .�..e.... ,�,.,_ ,_,_.,. ._ .,... � _._..�., .c..,... r'.o
ti
� E` .�.
AGENDA
�i�,.: 'ri�ard Planning Commission
� August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 P.M.
Twality Junior Iiigh School - Lecutre Ftoom
14650 SW 97th Ave. , Tigard, Oregon
1 . CALL TO ORnEI�: ;
2. ROLL C�LL: �?
3. APPROVAL OF MITIUTES: �'
�
4. COivIb7UNICA.TIONS : i'
t;
I'
5, F'UBLIC HEARINGS: �4I
5. 1 L,ONE CHANGE ZC 4-73 (Farmers Insurance) #;:
��,
I':_
A request by Farmers Insurance Group for an a.rnendment to a,
p].anned devel.opment (signing program) 1oc�,ted �etween SW �
6Cth A,venue on tli� east and IIighway 217 on the west . '
(Wash. Co. Tax n7ap 2S1-1D, Tax lots 100, 200, 300, 400, �/''
500, 501, '701, 1100) . ''
i'
r
5. 2 ZONE CHANGE 2,C �-75 (Bunn) t�
�` A request by Ken Bunn for �enexal plan and pro�ram .review
�;ss� of a proposed residential Planned D�velopment locatecl at
109�h and Canterbury Lane. (TNash. Co. Ta.x Pvlap �5�. lOAD,
Tax lot 8800) . r�
�
�y
5. 3 ZON� CHANGE ZC 5-'T6 (Fletcher, Hansen & Parsonaj �.;
t;;
A request b,y Fletcher, Ii�.nsen & Parsons for �. genexal �lan �;'j
and pro�ram revi.ew of a prop�s�d commercial-office park �
Planned Development located at the southeast corner of �'
S .W. 72nc1 Avenize and S.GU. V�.rns P�ad. (Wash . Co. Tax 14a� ?;��
2S1-lv, 2'a� lot 9C10) . f;
� 5�
�:
5 .4 CONDITIOVAL UaE PERN�IT C�7-Zl-7Fi (Fa.bric World) �
A request by Norxis �C StevEns, R�altors to locate a,
fabric st�re in a C-3 zone (General Commercial) at �'
1.2740-12760 S.W. PaeiFic Highway. (Wash. Co. Tax Map �:
2S1-2BD, Tax lot 1503) . �
S
5 . 5 NON-CONFORMING USE NCU 1-�-76 (Nlarine Lumber) �
,
A rec�uest Y�y Mar:ine Lumber Com�any to res�;ore a non-� �
conforming use fox a lumber storage building in a C-3 z�n� ��ti
(General Commercial) at 11G75 S.W. 1?acif ic I�ighway. �
(Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36Cn, Tax lat 100) . �
� �
�
�
�
�
�.
'�.�. �-�L
�:�
,.,...
�'���:§�� Planning Commission
��' August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 P.IvI.
' Twality Jr. High School
Ti�ard, Oregon
6 . SUBDIVISION
5 . 1 Minor I,and Partition MLP 3-76 (Burnh�.m Tracts)
A request by J. W. Atwood to partition a 5-3 acre parcel
into 2 ,26 acres a.nd 3 .04 acres par.cel on S.W.�11 St . ,
east of S .��'. Ash St. (Wash Co . Tax Map 251. 2 , Tax lot
200) .
7. O'r1iER I3USINESS
8. ADJnUR�P�'�NT:
�..
I
�
I
�Cy' � � . .. �.
.. . . .. . ... .. .�� -'.!I
;,.�_ � ,� �
,., , . .,. � _ : , . , . , . .
,. ,,
� . : ,
_ . . , .:,. w . . . �. . . _.__ ,_ . _ . � .
� � ' ���,
�
� `� �MI�TUTES
Tigard Planning Commission
�.-°° August 3, 1976 - 7 : 30 P.M.
��, Twal ity Jr . High -- Lecture Room
14650 S�V 97th Ave - Tigarcl, Oregon
l . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to arder at 7: 30 by
Chairman Popp,
2. ROLL CALL: Present : Popp, Porter, Sakata, Krause, Tepedino,
Moore, Goldbach, Nicoli and l�hillips
Staff : Dani�lu, Edwards
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES : ivIinutes of 7-20-76 approved as submitted.
4 . COMPdUNICATIONS - Daniels read a lettex from Mr. J. D. Annand
concerning ZC 4-75.
5 . PUBL,IC HEARINGS :
I
�
5. 1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-73 (Farmers Tnsurance} !
I
A request by Farmers Insurance Group for ari ametidment �to � E
plailned development �signing pro�ram) locat�d i�etween S`V �
G6th Avenue on the east an� Highway 217 on the west . (Wash .
Co . Tax Map 2S1 1D, tax lots 100, 20�J, 3�0, 4D0, 500, 501 , �
701, 1100) .
�.
o Mr. :Phillips stated tliat he was a. farm�r emp�.oy�e o.f
Farm�rs Insurance and informed the Commission that he
felt there was no conflict of inte�ESt and colzld tairly
laear the case. No dissensic�n was voieed by the Camrnission.
� � � A. Sta�f N,�epor�t : Read by D�aniels . �,
Li. Applicant Presentation :
�'
�,:
� � �;
o I�4r. William Finley, project architect, explainad the (:
past history of the pro,ject . ,
�
�;
0 1�Ir. Byron Ferris of I+'�rris Design presented the pr�- '`
posed tower sign, stseet signs and directional signs �
and showed the C'ommission an alternative to what was �'
a�provecll�y the besign Review Board. �
�r.
C. Public Testimony �;'
�.;
,�.
None �y�
�'
D. Staff I�ecommendation; �:;
€�;
The si�ning pxog.ram is in compliance with the Genera:l.
Plan anci Pragram as approved, in that it is compatible `�fi
with the site azid recommends apr�roval as submztted.
� _
_ —A----,.- ,
. .._ �.�.
� , �iI I NUTE S ��_; �'��,,�:
� , Tigard Planning Commission
August 3, 19 76 - '7: 30 PM
�r�...
Page 2
�. _
E. Pebuttal
None
F. Comrnission Discussion and Action
Porter moved and Goldbach seconded t.hat the proposed
signs be accepted based on the findings in the staff
�report .
The motion passed by unanzmous voiae vate.
5.2 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-75 (Bunn)
A request by Ken Bunn for general plan and program review �f
a propo�ed residential planned develo�men.t locat�d at SW
10�th Ave and SW Canter•bury Lane, (Wasli. G�. Tax t�ap �S1
lOAll, tax lot 880�) .
A. Staff Rcport : Read by DaniPls
i
i
o Read applicant 's letter !
,
�
o ClarifiEd I'a_nc�in� 1 ta read that the west cuxb line
��,. of SW 109th Avenue be moved 1 ' from the west pr�-
pex�ty lin�.
Staff informed the Carnmission tlza� the staeet situation
is the only item that is not in compliance with the
�reliminar,y approval .
r�
�ross Examina.tion: �;
�',
� ���
o Kraizse st��,ted that the d�eveloper sl74uld ta.l�e fu11 i:
resp�nsibili�y for the road. impr�vement . �
k:
o St�,�f expla;ined t:he u�ual procedure for street (;
improvements anc� what was being rec�mmended. �
�
�
B. Applicant Presentation j
��
Joe Van Loom, project a�chitect �.
�:
o reviewed history and pr�sent stai;us of prpject `
�
o stated th�t tlley would do a� fu11 street �.mprc�vernent ,;
to the l�op and would dedicate the right of way an �`
��
the rem�.inin� lerigth o� th� stre�� . ,
�
� Kenneth B�unra �
�:
o Pxpla,ined propo�ed s�wex hook-up.
�
_ �
� �
�
• � ��,
!IIINUTES
Tigard Planning Commission
�. Augusi; 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PNI
Page 3 �
i
i
C. Public Testimon�
o Dale How� - Townhouse Associatian, and Dale I
Erik�on - adjacent homeowners expressed concern for �
the location oF sewer hook-up and traffic load.
i
o George Warner - Construction Services asked that a �
bufFer. be placed on the east property line.
�
D. Sta�r Recornmendations : �
Staff recommends approval with the �Lollowing conditions: �
�
s
1 . Storm and sanitary sewer s,ystem be approved by �
En�i.neering nepar.tment prior to submission to the ;
City Council :Eor. general lan and �
p pr.ogram review.
2. That S4V 109th Av�nue be improved to city standards t�
of 34 ' pavemenf: �vidth on a 50 ' ri�ht o�' way from �
its existing End point of the intersection with the ;'
souther�lp loop c�rive and a 25 ' ri�ht of way be pro- €'
vided along the rest o.f �;he parcel ' s west property '
� line. Street improvement as per Engineeri.n� Depart- '
ment propc�sa]. wi�;h the west curb 1 ' frnm west pro-
perty line.
3. That a str�et plug be attached along �che west side ;
of the f'ull improvement to SSV 109th Avenue until f
such �time as �Lhe remainder of. ln9th (adjacent �this °'
prop�rty) is developed. t'
4�
4 . The existin� street plug at the end oF 109th be ;i
vacated.
k;
5. The areas along the loop drive not shown for parking �
spaces be signed to prohibit parking along that � ('
street . �
!
- 6. All si.dewalk and trai7.s terminate in wtieelchair '
ramps . ��
�
7. A minimum o� six picnic areas be esl:ablished within
�:he forested area; de5ign and lacation subject to ;
approv�,l k�y P],anning llirector.
R. A��l�c�.tion to xect�.�y the partitioning• p,rr,>blems be
initiat�d prior to considex•ation of thE General P].an �
and Program �y the City Council. . ,
,
�
�F.
.�_. . _
. . .....r.�.:»s > �:,.. .... �.1- :..,�� �'>.rv+,...i.,.,,-.'��:.,.,..., .��..5......��A. 4-;:.�. .......,,..w....c. .v_.w...,..`�...�-.4._....,.rs .,>
�
b.� �.��� �.�,�
• {� .�. ��.�^� .
qV�
, MIIVUTES
Tigard Planning Commissian
„E August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PM
���, Page 4 ��
z
E . Commission Discussion anci Action:
o Phi.�.lips expressed concern over setbacka if the road ;
is shifted. �:
�;
R.
o Krause asked that the matter be tabled until the
sewer and street were resolved.
a
-;
o Bunn stateci he would be willing to place the entire '
street improvement on hi� praperty . `
�,
�
o Staf� re-read letter from Jack �.nnand to clarify
access problems.
o Krause moved and A400re seconded to ta;ble tYie motion '
unti7, the proposed st.reet s,ystem was aciec�uately �i
sllown ori the site plan . �`
�;
The moti.on carriecl 8 to 1 with Phillips dissenting.
5. 3 ZONE CHANGE 7C 5-7�i (Fletcher, Hansen R� Parsons)
� A request by Fletcher, Har�sen & P�,rsons for a general. p�an
�: and program review of a proposed commercia�-office park
planne� development located at the south�ast corner of SW
72nd �venue and SW Varns Road, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1D,
tax lat 90U) .
A. Staff Repart : �tPad by Dani.�ls �
�
o IIasic Fact #4 was corrected to read June 15, 1�76 . �
o Staff �res�nted applicants pro�;ram booklet to the
Commissi�i� .
B. Applicant 's Fresentation
� Rober�t Fletcher stated tl�.at he c�isagreed with concli-
tion #21 and asked �Chat the complex bF allowed to
set their ovrn restrictions on the proposed uses.
o Krause asked that the applicant clarify what uses
th�y w�u]_d permit.
o B�rry I�and, l�rchitect, stated that :
n g•round rules would preclude objectionable firms .
� � o divPrse r�aterials and styles would be permitted
in the development
,.,-
..,�,
, ��� ,.,�
- MINUT�S
Tigard Planning Commission
�.T August 3, 1976 -- 7: 30 PM
� : Page 5
o Fletcher stated that the sidewalk would be a 4. '
wide, meand�ring, and of �.splzalt .
o Mr . Hilton Smith - r�alt�r, stated that the mixed
uses were needed for econorr�ic stabilit,y.
C. Public Testimony
o Paul Warner - neighbor stated that 7Znd could not
handle an additional tra.�fic load.
o Staf:F read letter from Bloodworth and Peterson,
architects, which exp.ressed a desire for a common
architectural theme i.n the Planneci Development and
objected to any industrial uses.
v. Staff Recommendations
�.
Staf� recommends approval with the :Eollowing conditions :
1 . The signing program for the entire park be subject
to llesign Review Boarc� ap:proval .
2. That twenty feet alon� SW ?2nd �,venue be dedicated
for the fui;ure widening o� SW 72nd Avenue to
a.rterial standarcls.
3. An agrFement to participate in a ]_ocal im�rovement
district for the improvement �� SW 72nd to City
standards to an �,rterial. street and the same type of
agreement }ae attached to lots 9, 10 and 11 �o bring
Varns Street tzp to Cit;y local street sta.ndalds.
4 . � covenant to the de�ds for lots 1-8, 1.2 and 13 b�
executed prohibit�,ng access to SW 72r�c� a.nd SW Varns
Si: . Lots 9, 10 and ll which will have access to
SW Varns shall be x es�ricted from Yraving througk�
access to the internal stxee�; .
�. The setk�ack f�om SW 72,nd Avenue b� 40' with a 10 '
intrusion a�.lowable for no more than 1/3 of th�
lot widtlz, if no other feasible npti�n is available.
6 . A ;LO ' wide emex�;�ency v�hic:Le access k�e provided
along ei•ther lot lU or 11 on a pedestr.ian path or
to be constructed with 6 inches o� base rock aver-
laden with sod and si.gned at both SW Varns St , and
•the unnamed �nterior road,
� 7. The internal stree t with a 2.,0 ' pavernent wi.dth be
c�nst.ructed to city standard �or commercial streets
and signed for no parkYnga
. . ...�. .. .
- ,�- s .M_...�.—. ��.-_-
_ _
,...., ,.�. . _....�. t.�. �........ .� . . � ��.. _.. ,_. . ., , , ,.._..,� _.. . ,..�.. ._. . �,. �,.._.��, . . ._ .. ,__.,.�..,.�. �_,., ,�,.. . .. .,.. _.<_... .�..... .�x.,�.,_.�.,�,�, ,
tl � MINUTES
Tigard Planning Comniission
August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PM
�,:,- Page 6
f3. The bus tu•rn��t lane be dedicated and improved as
part of tl�e SW 72nd Avenue loca�. improvement district:
9 . WheelcYiair ramps be construc>�ed to city standards at
the northwesi; cornex of lot l.?,, sou�th;west and south-
east corn�r of Lot 13, tne northwest and northeast
co.rner o� L�t i aria the street median .
10. A �ive foot u.tilit,y easement be pr�vided �,long all
lot lines as deeded.
11 . Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be c�mbined with adjacent
lots and access to lot 9 be combined with lot 8.
Access to lots 7.4 and 15 be provided on the north and
south respectively aiid access to lots 7. and 13 be
fx•om the int�rna:l road, not the entran�� way,
12. The storm draina�;e and retenti�n system be approved
by th� Cit� Engineering Departm�n�, Washingtan Caunty
Department of Public Works and the Sta.te Iiighway
Department .
1.3. A street �p�ning permit onto SW 72nd be ar,quired from
�.' Washington County nepartment of Publie tiYarh�.
l�. A �treet lighting plan to citp sta.ndarc�s be a,pproved
by P.Cx,E.
15. All outright pe.rm�.tted uses allowed in th� co��merc�.al-
professiana�. zon� lae permitted and. srna'11-sca..le, Timited
.resear�li and developm�z�t t,ype of xion=polluting industry
in accordance with the conditional t�se chapter of the
Tigard �Iunicipa�. Cod�.
].6. .All remaining as�ects o;L tl�e r�eve�.opment b� con- i
st.ructed t� appli.cable health, subciivision and zoni.n� �
codes. i
�
E. Gommissa�on Discu,sion and Action
�
o Sta�� pointed out that the major unresol.ved is�ue is '
with the proposecl us�s and that the reduced size o� ;
the stree� to 20 ' pavement wid�th wou]:d limit the �
industri.al uses. _ i
�
o Staff cla,ri.�ied the intenl: of condition 15 statin.g
I
- that as proposed a limited number of sma11 scale non- i
��fic�e uses would be a1lr�wed on.l,y a:�ter. Planning �
, �; Ca:mmission reviPw tllrough thE conditiona7. use p.r.o-
visi6ns of the Tiga:rd Munici,pal Code, �nd �hat the ' �
Design Review Boarc� would' decide wh�l;her th� arc:hite�-
ture was corn,pa,tible. - �
�K...:..
.. _.,. ..��.��. �_�...�:�
; _ . _ _ , . , ,.: ,
: �� �. � . ��._ ..._ , , . _
_ .... . _ ._, _ . �. _,..,
� �.
� N1 I NUTE S �,,,,, �
• Tigard 'Planning Commission
August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PM
,.-. Page 7
�. ,
Goldbach moved and Phillip� sec�nded tl�.at the motion be
approved with the Staff Recommendations.
Th� motion was carried 8 to 1 with Nicoli dissenting.
5.4 CONDITIONAL USE P�RMIT CU Z1-76 (Fabric World)
A request by Norris & Stevens, I�ealtors, t� locate a fabric
store in a C-3 zone (General Commercia�.) at 12740-12760 SW
Pacific Highwayo (Wash . Co. Tax Ma� 2S1 2BU, tax lot 1503) .
A. Staff Repost : Read by Daniels.
B. Ap�licant 's Presentation:
o Fred Young �F Norris and Stevens Realtor. s expl�.ined
the pr.opos�d use, presenteci the landscape plan �.nd
asl�ed that traffic be directed on�to �4V Mckenzie S�tree�t;
by a Ieft turn lane :�rom SW Paci:fic Ha.gnway.
C . Public Testimony
None i
�.' D. Staff Recommendations:
�ta�� recommends app.roval with. the lollcswing conditions:
l . That a seven foot landscape strip be established
between the sidewalk and the paxking area.
ti�
2. That the southern most cuxb cut be cJ.�sed and re- �','
placed by sidewalk. This would leave a rentrall.y i,
placed curb cut on Pacif ic and oiie ori McKenzie St. �
which actualTy serves as a d.rivewa,y for the center. �
� � � f,
3. Tha�t the north �ront of the building not bein� usa� ��'
f�r parking or walkway (circled in red on the pla.n) ��
be landsraped, �,,
�:
4 . `Chat planting strips be established at apprc�ximatel:y ��.
70 ' on center eaclz way in �the parking lo� , : ?`
��,:
�'.
5 . That the tei�ar�ts of Village ;Square work tagether on �;
forming �ns sign that would satisfy their ex�:sting Ft'
and future needs. ?�f
i`.
6. That the illegal signs on site be removed. �
�� �{,I
7. That the proposed sign and landscape plan be subject R
to Design Review. �{
0 Statf noted that rec�mmendations 1 , 2," and 3 were �
shown on the landscape pZan, �'�
�. ,:ro ., _ _ _.:. �... _, T...,w,:.
• -- -- -- - ,�
. �,>
, ,
, ���: ����''
' ° MINUTES
Tigard Planning Commission
!^�` Augu�t 3, 19�l6 - 7: 30 PM
�.... Page 8
Cross Examination:
o Krause - asked that a right turn only out of the
paxking lot be considered.
o Young stated that landscape is-lands within the parking
ar�as would impose a hardship sa.nce there was alread,y
a shortage of parkirig places .
o IvloQr� moved �,nd Tepedino seconded to approve the sub--
mitted landscape plan and request with the staff
recommendations except #4.
� Nicoli stated that tne Commission shau�d be consistent
on demanding parking islands .
The mo�tion was carried in an $ to 1 vo�te with Nicole dis-
senting.
5.5 NON-CONFORMING USE NCU 1-75 (Marine Lumber)
A request by Ma�iiie Lumber Company 1:o restore a non-confarming
�s use .for a 1umbEr Utora,ge buil.ding in a C-� zone �General
`° Cotnrnercial at 116:75 SW Pacific Hi hwa
) � y. (Wash. Co . Ta.x Map
I51 36CD, tax lat 1.00) .
A. �ta.f� Report : Read by Daniels
o An adc�itional finding was �,dded that P�a�fle wtreet
lacks the lull right of' way required :for a collect�r
street .
B. A,pplicant ' s Presentation
o Mr. Whitman, store rnanager, aresented a lancisc:a:pe
plan and cammented that a row �� i;rees e�isteci �n
P;�ai'f.le Stre�t . ;
i
o tiVilliam Reynolds of Rose City Pr��Cut Buildings stated '
tha�: : I
J
o ther� woul:d b� a 15' setback an P.faffle ��
�
o thE buildiil� would be 3 ' lower than the fortner i
buildin� ' J
i
o the sou�;h side of the k�uildin� would bE screened �
r
�
�� C. Public Testimony i
�
a
o Oscar �tir. ie, adjoining neig.hbo.r stated that he had j
no objection to the proposed builc�i.ng. 'j
1
�
�
�
„r �� _�,. ... ,� .. ,.
I
. .,,;._., �
� , .
: , -
, ,; , . , ,., , �
� ;� ,,.:
MINUTES
. � �Pigard Planning Comrnission
August 3, 1976 - 7 : 30 PM
,:�
Page 9
�,^:
D. StaFf Recommendations
Staf:t recommends approval witl� the i'ollowing condit ions:
l . A landscape plan be submitted to Design Peview Board
which includes siglit obscuring plantings along the
north and west p.roperty lines and an attempt be
made to provide some landscaping in the front ol
the building adjacent Pfaf�le and Pacific where a
10 ' landscaped setback is required.
2, That five feet of right of wa,y be dedicated on StiV
P�aFfle for futtzre street widening.
Moore moved and Krause seconded t� a�prove i�he proposal
with the sta�Ef recomm�ndations .
The motion wa,s approved by unanimous voice vote.
6, SUBDIVISION
6 .1 MINnR LAiVD PARTITION MLP 3-76 (Burnham Tracts)
� A request by J. W. Atwood to p��.rtition a 5 . 3 acre parcel into
2 .26 acres and 3 .04 acres parcel on SW Hill St . , east o� SW
Ash St . (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2BD, tax lot 200) .
A. Staff Report : Read by Daniels
� o Staff. explain�d why this pro�osal had been r�manded �
back to the Planning Commis�ion.
B. Applican�t 's Prescntation: �
�
� ��
o Jim Atwnod, appla.cant , e�plainEd the proposed' lot�;ing #
pattern .
C. Pub].ic Tes�timt�ny ;
�
o Fred Anderson, ai,torizey, for 25 citizens in the �
surrounding neighborhood questioned the applicant on �
tne #ollowing:
o th� �urpose behind �the p�.rtitioning
o wheth:Pr the Neighborhood Plan hacl been i:aken into
corisider.at ion
�
!
� proposed entry and exit from the site �
� o Nx�. Bailey, at'torney �or the City o� Tigarcl, clarifie� j
t11e pa�t history of the minor land parti�ion and s�Gated !
�nly the parceling of the land �.�t;s�lf should be con- �
�
I
�
,.,._,. _:. ,� _ ,
�
.
� t, _ _ , _; ,
n r,�+,� ,�.�r
1V11 lY U 1 L`AJ ��'�.,_.�, �d��-�.
''W;F
, � "Pigard Planning Commission
August 3, 1976 - 7: 30 PM
Page 10
1���'
�.:'
sidered at this time not its future use.
o l�r. A.nderson requested that the matter be tabled
since his clients had not seen the proposed parti-
tionin� and had been mislead by seeing a map that
showed prior partitioning.
o Staff replied that the map sent ��ith tYie a�enda was
merely a vicinity map and was not intended to show the �
proposed paxtitioning.
o IVIr. Anderson cited Chapter 17. 34 of the Tigard �
Municipal Code and sev�ra,l sections of the Oregon �
I�evi.sed Statutes on minor land partitioning to �
support his case that the minor land parta.tion must ;
be consistPnt with the Tigarcl Conlmunity Plan. `�
,;
;�
D. Staf f Recon�m�ndat i_ans: t;
�
Staff recommends appx•oval since the request conforms to �:
r�,
tlze dimensional arid access requirements of the Tigard i;
Municipal Code and the Neighborhood Plan Organization. #';
�;
E . Commisszon Discussion and Rebuttal �?
�. ' i;
o Sta:ff explained that Design ReC�iew Board has the �
,.
proper autho.rity to address the land use problem. '`
�':
o Krause ask�d coian�el if the notificati�n wa;� lEgal �"'
S?"
o Bailey statecl that tlle notice was valid ���
i<:
o Sta.f.� inf<�rmEd Commissi�n that the actual partitioning ;;.',
line wauld be surveyed anc� would not depend on the ''!
�.-.
creek fluctuations. ;.:,
��,�
;}r
a Sa.kata moved and Moore second.ed �L-hat the proposa7. be �
tabled. -�.;
,�4
The motion was defeated in a 4 to � vote with Krause, +:�"
Tepedin�, Moore, Goldba�h and Phillips c�issenting, `
x,,,
Phillips moved and Goldbach seconded to approve the ;;:
mznor land partition }aased on its eonformance to the �:•;
Nei�hborhood Plan I . i;:-'
��;
The motion was passed Yay a voice vote 7 to 1 with Sakata ��;;
dissenting and Fopp ab�tainin�. �,:.;.
� 7. OTkiER BUSIVESS
�`;;
�`;;
,�
U'�
o Staff i.n�ormed the Commissi.on th�.t the conditiotial use approved �s�
�,
fox t:he Department o� b4oto.r Vehicles would be Izea.rd by the �`.���
_ � � � � � ��`�,
���
� � � � � � �;.
. . . .. . � � �3r
. tD
. . .. a _- .. ,. ., ,. , , ,
� —_ -- �y�
.
_. : . .
• :: - . , .._ _ ,
. . .._� �t�
' ry i�IINUTES �� k��� k;?'
� ; '7'igard Plannin� Commission �,�� '%
August 3, 1976-7: 30 PM �'
Page 1]. �'��I
��` �.,,
City Cauncil August 9th. �`;�I
o Staff noti:fied the Commission that a study session would be �:1�j
helci August 31st . �'''
�,I
8. ADJOURNI+IENT: 12 : 10 AM �;I
�'l;
�':
k'',
II'
!'
�,
�:{
�;,
!�
r;
`;i
�11
;`I
i?
c:r
t1
�,,�
i:.�
�ki
�> �,�i
p!'
.�
j:�i
1li
3�
�o
�;I
l'.
��
s�
a��
,,
�4'
�%�,
�ii
i
n
ti
�t�
�
�.e
�
� . .� f';'���.
�
. . .. . . . � . . � � . ��
�...._... _. . . ._. . �. . .. .. . . . . . ..... .: . .. .. ..... . . ... _., .. '' -. .. . .__...... . .,_�...... . .._ .,. ...,_...r.. ._,... .. .. ..�_.. .. ,. _ . .. .
r'?''�.
� �' �
��,_ �;�:;;
STAFF REPORT �
�
Tigard Planning Commission
� August 3, 197C �'
Agenda 5. 1 ;,;
i,
Y
C
DOCKET: ZC 4-73 t�
R�QUEST: F�eviev� of Signing Program ��
�'
r.
LOCATION: Triangle Pa.rk at Hwy 217, I-5 and S.W. GOth Parliway �'
4
AP�LICANT: Farmer 's Insu.rance E;
i;
BASIC FACTS :
i.
l . The site is designated "Residential Commercial" on the Tigaxd
Community Plan and zoned "C-P, Commercial Professional-
Planned Development" .
,,�
2. The CP-PD zone was app.roved September 9, 1974.
3. �ection 18.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code states :
"Signs in a planned development district (under provisions
af Chapter 18.56) for the spcific purpose of site idenitifica-
tian, building identification, tenant ident�fication and
traffic direction may be permitted in such planned development
� district as approved in the general plan (Section 18.56 .U30)
subject to de�ign .review board ap�roval , providing that an �?
integrated sign theme is car.ried out compa�tible with the �`�
overa.11 development and consistent witl�. the approved General (
Plan and Program. ��
��
�
4. 'rhe approved General Plan and I�rogr.am refexs to the signzng ;'
program in the following� manner: "Lighting, signing, bus i'
stops, seating areas, pedestrian walks, bridges, etc. , Will
be designed to camplement the natural wooded setting and
office campus atmosphere" (page E) .
4.
5. The Desi�n Review Board r�n June �2, 1�Ji6 ap�roved tYie request �:;
with the �ollowing condition,
"'1'he tempc�rary leasin.g sign be reduced in width so as to �
provide a 6" border along the sides of the sign'r '`1
�:�
CONCLUSIONARY FINDIIVG AND RECOMMENDATION: ''�
Staff finds that the Signing Program is in compliance with the
General Plan and Program as approved in that it is compal;ible with "�
the site and recommends approval as submitted. �'
�;;
;,.
��;
�;i��,
�. `!'�{�
�`'I
���
'.4�
�jv
i�
� . . . . . . . . . .dl .... .. ..... ... .. . .... . .... _ . .... . . . . .:�. ���.�
_ .
. I'
. � ,,
7 �::' A
` STAFF REPORT �
Agenda 5.2 �j
�'� Tigard Planning Commission t;
August 3, 1976 �- 7: 30 P.M. ��,
Twality Juni.or High School - Lecture Room ��
Ti�ard, Oregon
��:.
DOCKET: ZQNE CIiAVGE 7C �-75 i'';
r!
REQUEST: General plan and prugram review of proposed 76 unit residential ,'
plan developmetit . �'
LOCATION: Canterbury Hill and S .W. 109t1z Avenue (Was�i. Co . T�.x P�Iap �'
2S1 lOAD, tax lot 8800) . �`
Es''
APPLICANT: Ken Bunn �`'
�'';
BASIC FACTS: r''
1 . Tigard Community Plan clesigna,tes this area as a transitionary `�'
area from 41�,esiciential-Commer�ial" to "Urk�an Law Density �'
N,esid�ntial" .
Z . The Plaizning Commission an May 18, I976, approved a prelimina.r. ,y z;,!
plan and program for this praject with the following conditions:
;-;'-
1 . The ameniti�s specified on the site plan T�e located on the
G;
n it ea for eneral lan and ro ra.m >.�
site la subm. t p P �
P g
�., �,
review. ��-
�,';
€;,
2. The method _for pr�viding the z•igl�t of way an:d improvement �
of S .W. 1��tYi be specif i.ed in tYie general plan . ��
,�
3. Tl�e overall density be limited to 10 . 5 units per acre. ��
1:;
4 . The propased swinnming �ool and recreation building be ��:
moved to a locatiari more internal to tl�e developrrient . �-�
$:.
� FIiVllITJG� : r`
;
`;•°a
l . Al1 the conditi�ns attached to the preliminary a.pproval liave ;"�,
been incorporated in the General Flan except condition #2 , i
110 provisions for the rig.ht of way cledic�tion and improv�men�: ,.
of S�v 198th is s ecified. In reviewin this pr.ohlem, the y�
P
�
� f �;'
Enginee.rin� Departm�nt nas recomrnended full in�provement o ,�.
SW 109i;h to full right of wa;� to the southerl,y intersec�ion �;`�
of the loo drive . In addition one hal:� o�f , the right of ,�;;
p �
� � i h is ��'k�
for c:�ntinuation of the street qf �i;hat ortion wh c �;;
wa P
Y .
on the a licant ' s ro ert and a street plug along the entire 'p
P� P P Y>
��
' ' ' ' � onto that
length of the full improvement limiting acc ss �:.
street frorn the parcel to the west . The Engineering Departm�nt F;
axs
x-
• her r.ecommended that this street be built to cit stan a d
.f ur.t t;
Y ,�
� incluc�ing a 34 ' pavement width. The full improvemeni; U� SW ��
rA lU9th at this time as proposed should absolve the appl.icant ��
of participation in further improvements for SW 109t�i Avenue t3
to the south as that area develops, (F
1��.
�,
��f
,,. ., _ . e ,. . . .,.:
�
,._ ,� , .
.:
� ,
. � �';:��p
Staff F�port
Agenda 5. 2
Tigard Planning Commission
August 3, 1976
�' l�a e 2
�
2 . No curve; radius is shown for �the in�tersec�t;ion o� 109t1� .
3. All t.rails and sidewalks should terminate in. wl�.eelchair r.amps
to city sta,ndards.
4 . Parking in areas other than those sktown for that pur�ose would
inhibit the flow of tra:ffic and sl7ould be prohibited.
5. A 15 ' easement along the east proper.ty line is necessary for
public sewer.
6 . No provision for storm or sanitary sewer are shown nor ar�
there provisians for the extension for water service to the
site.
7. No str�et light program is shown.
� i
1
8 . The trails shown a�e of two differeiit types . The trail to �
the nor�th is to function as an alternative to a sidewalk ati� s
leading frc�m th� three lower buildin.gs ta the recxeation. build-- �
in�� and po�I . These would probably be heavily used and v;ould
neect to be blacl�top of five faot in wicith. The trail to �tai�
�.,, south ap�ears to be a recreation trail �.rid caulcl be develo��eci
at a lessez� standard.
9 . The applicant is proposing to loc�;te six (F) picnic tal�leU
of.f oi' the natural w�oded area,s and prov�de playgro�zncl, �
I.'
10. This parcel h�.s not been partitioned from the ori�inal p�,rcelo j`i
Tliis shoizld be done prior to f inal approval by the Planning �:;;
Di.rec,tor. Also it should be not�d th.�t thexe is a.n illegal �;!
minor land parti�tion on •the portian of .the lot tha.t extends �'�'
^;;
along SW l0�th Av�nue to SW Mu.rdoe.k S�; .
i`;;
11 . T17e applicant proposes i;o dedicate a 30,0•OO square �oot area f
:I'or pliblic parli. On July 27, 1976, the park board revic��vec1 �:
�t.nis �ro�osal and voted to preliminarily accept this of:�er. t>`
Problems clo arise a.s to tlle size, location, access, parr�ii�g ��'
�,nd future use of this park area. If, in furtlzer c�nsidering �'
this x•equPSt , the park board decides that it is not in the ��
bes�t> interest of the City to accept this into the city park n'
system :�or public maintenance, k�ua.lciix�g seven and �igtit could &z
be spaced samewhat great�r than shown an the site plan and the `=-;
trail shown on the site lan eaulci ori r"�
p ginate also from SW �
109tI1 l�venue.
� ���
12. The I7niform Builaing Code requir� �: minimum 4 ' high sa.fety �;�.
� fence arolznd the pe.rimeter of the pool . ��,;
�
�;f
�'
�ti.
��:
��a
�.
�:
,
�a _ , _ ...... .� s.
� �_� . .. , .. ,..
��_ �,�e . _ . _ ;
, ,,,. , , _ , . _.. f.
�r �J .
. S�;af�t R���or1; " '
A g en cl a 5.'�.
Tiga�cl Planning Caminission
'�; Aizgust�"�, 197G � .
Pa�� 3 �
CONCI�USIONARY FINllINGS
1 , The aparl;meTZt develo�ment at ]_0 . 5 units �i;o tt7e acre coni'ox�ms '
� to the Tiga.rd Communi_ty Pla.n. . �
^ - ' �1s from t17e Ti�-ard A�t�i�icipal Cod� a.re warranted ��
2. 111e devia.tso 5
in tZ�at large are�,s o.f tr�es are being maintain�d in a natural i
state and the site includes a swimming pool and r�creation �
Uuildin�. `
t'
3. The ��roposal is in 1�'armony .��ith t11e tS��e o� develo��ment that �'
zi
has occui red on Can�;erbury I3i11 and f its w�ll witl� tlze ��,
, develaZ�m�i1t 'potl� to the north and to �the east .
�
d�'
4. Tkie �a��rn�:rshi�a is proposecl to be maintained zri one single ';
�,
o«7zlership . This will a,ssure �Llae rnaa_r1l;enance of the o��en.
• space and amcni�;ies as de�icteci on the site �lan and llot�d ,-;
r'
on i;l�e pxogram.
��.
{r.
5. Tk7e de���1o���n�nt o� 1;3ze parcel in. the mann�r sl�own on 1:he sii;� C
plan will have a bene�'icia.l effect ois tll� ar•ea tk�at «�ould Iaot E';
noimally be achieved under standa.rd zoning, +'
,�
G . The applicai7t has stated �i.1�at t,he clevelo��rn�nt c�.i7 be x_ni�tiai;�d
within one yea.r .
7. The al�p7.icailt has establi.slzed a, public n��d �oi a mul�:i-i'amily �
pla.�zneci develol�i7��n�t on i;his tiite.
�i'�
, g , Tl�e site is unic�,.zely suit�d �or multi-:T�.mily r�sident.i�,l area }�
of the i;,yp� cl�l��.ct�d oi1 tl�� sii�e dcvelol�mez�t p1�.n .
;,
� � �
' �.
� , ���I
l;
l
�
�
�
�
�
ii
. �I
1
, i
, i
� _ _.. . . _��:. . ._.. .: .. x;: _._,..�_ . ,. .: �_ _ —
� , ,. ,.., ���, .� .�,_ . , ....,,
, �� ��.
�._.
Agenda 5.2 �
r�, Tigard Planning Commission '
August 3, 1976 ,
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS :
S1;aff recomn�ends approval with the following conditions : !i
l . Storm and sanitary sewer s�sten� be approved by Engineering I
Department prior to submission to the City Council for
general plan and program review. I
2. That �W 109th Avenue be im�roved to city standards of 34' I
pavement width on a 50 ' right of way �rom its existing end
point to the intersection with the southerly loop drive j
and a 25 ' right of way be provided along the rest of the I
parcel 's west property line.
3. Tha�t a street plug be attached along tlle wesi; side of the
full imp.rovement to SW 109th Avenue until such time as the
remaind.er o�f 109�h (adjacent �;his property) is devel�ped.
4. The existing street plug at the end of 1091;h be vac,ated.
�
5. The areas along the laop drive not shown for. parking spaces
� be signed to prohibit parking along that street . ;
'� �
�;�:
o . A 15 ' wicle �asement �or public sewers �ie established along
tk�e east property ].ine.
�
7. All sidewalk and tx•ails terminate iii whee3chair ramps.
� - 8. S�rreet lights approved by P.G.E . be submitted to Engineering j
Departmen�t for approval.
;
90 A minimum four foot safety fence be lacated around the peri- ;
meter of the poal area. (
�
10. The trail sh.own in the northern half of the development be ;
5 ' asphal� paths and the trail on the southern portion be '
left natural with minimal improvemen�ts of crushed gravel of
three to four inches of compacted barko ;
(
F
11 . A minimal of six picnic areas be esta.blish�d within the �
forested area; design and location subject to approval by �
Plannin� Director .
l2 . Application to rectify the partitioning problem� be initiated �
prior to consi.deration of the General Pla,n and T�rogram by the �
City Council .
� �
�
. � . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . , . ,... . -..i
. ,�+ 5`�+� ��;
� ST.AFF RFPVR�l'
, Agen.da 5. 3
�.P Tigard Planning Commission
August 3, 1�7F� - 7: 30 P.M.
Twality Junior High School - Lecture R,00m
Tigard, Oregan
DOCKET: ZnNE CHANGE ZC 5-76
REQUE�T: General Plan and Program F�eview of a Commercial Office Park
LOCATION: SE corner� of SW 72nd and SW Varns Rcl. (Wa�h, Co. tax map
2S1 1D, tax lot 500)
�
APPLICANT; Hanson-Fletcher-Parsons �
�
{
�
BAS�C FACTS : ;
�
l . The site is designated "General Indus�trial" on the Tigard �
Community Plan and zoned M-'�, Indt�strial Park P�ann�ci �
Develapment. j
;�
2. The site is pr.esently iii �orest cover of mainly first and 4
seconcl growth Douglas Fir, Oak, Spruce, Ash and Ald:�r, -trees �
with dense unc�erbrush, �ern� and moss. �'
�
�� 3. The surrounding land use is primarily undeveloped with pre�- �'
-� fessional offices to the east , single fami.ly homes an very
large lots ta tlae nor�th and sUUth, and residences alan� S`V
72nd Avenue to the west .
4. 'I':ne Planning Commi�sic�n on July 15, 1976, approvPd the
preliminary plan and program w�th the �ollowin� cr�ri�itions , ��;
�?
1 . Lot size, right-�f�way width, pavement width, setbacl�s, w�
curve radii be noted code c�eviations. �;,
E.
2 . Signing �rogram for entir� park be submitted to the �`
I7eszgn Revi�w BUa.rd. (;
r;
3. Tlzat an additional ZO feet of right-of-way on 72nd be �°
dedicateci, ancl the applicant file with the City Recorder �'
a non-xemonstiance agr.eement for fu11 street irnprovements �
to SW 72nd Street in accordance with Public Works
Stand.a�ds.
�
4, Deed Covenants be executed restr.icti.ng access from SW �;
Varns and SW 72nd Aveiiue. '"
C;
� 5. The cent�er li�ne� cta,rve ra�dii� be n��o� les�s th�an ���0 fe��et. � � � � �
. , . . .. . . . . . . � . 4
. . . .. . . . .. (;
. : . . . . . � .�g.
6 . The setback from S�V 72nd be 40 feet with a 10 foot ;
�; intrusion allowable for no more than 1/3 of �he lot �
width, if no other feasible op�ion i� available. Use af y
this setback area is nee:ded to site a proposed buiTding
and/or parking area. �
�. . . , . .
� � � � �. ,„ _..,,,,, ,. : ����
. . ,, �..� . .,
, , _
�. : --- -
—
, _ _ �
" ��;.
�" ��T � U
�taff Report �,� ��� �,
• Agenda 5. 3
� Tigard Planning Commission
�,;
August 3, 1976
. f;..
Page 2 �. ,
�.,:. �^•
���.,�'��
7. S�condary emer_gency vehicle access would be provided � :,j
from Varns Street as an addition to �the footpath system I
or be constructed with six foot base rock overladen with �,�
arns and the interior road. ���
sod and signed at both SW V �:;�
8. A street cross section be �ubmitted for Engineering �'�
Department review prior to General Plan and Program
Revie��. �:i
f;,
9 . The bus turnout lane be dedicated and improved as part �'
I.�_-`;
of the SW 72nd L, I .D. �;?
10 . Standard wheelchair ramps be provided at the noithwest � ''
f,
corner of Lot 12, S.W. and S .E. corner of Lot 13 and the `�;:
N.W. and N.E. corner of Lot l, cros� section of the � '
ramps anr_1 path be subject to Engineering Department j;�;;:
approval o [;;'
i:'
11 . A pa-th be provided along either the in.si.de or outside of �'-.
the interior road or internal to Lots 14 a,nd 15 and j;;
provision for crossing the traffic island be shown. �.
i'i;
;,.,
12. A five foot utility easemen.t be provided along all I'::
propert,y lines as deeded. �''
�.. �'�
I3 . Access to Lots �, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacent
�
lots and access to Lot 9 be combined wit� Lot 8. AccPSS ��'
to Lots 14 �,nd 15 be provided on the north and south �
respectively and a.ccess to Lot 1 anc� 13 be from tlae c;
internal road, not the entrance way. !;
�:�
14. All utilities serving this site be underground. {
�'
15. Locati�n and design of storm and sariitary sewer and �a
water lines and drainage retentic�n system be s�ubmitted };
to City Engineering Departmen�; �.nd Washington Cou.nty �'
Public �vorks Department for appro�val prior to General ��
,
Plan Review. • �
16. Landscaping plan for each. parcel be reviewed by the
Design l�eview Board prior to issuance of buildin.g permit
by City. �
17. Access street opening permit on SW 72nd be acquired from
Washington County Public Worhs Department . ti
18 . Road improvements and signing be constructed prior to �
issuance of building permits.
�' 19 . A �treet lighting plan be atzbrnitted for Ci.ty approval .
�__ _ ,. .. ...,.. . . ,..., . .. _
_. _ . _
,. . ..,. ... _. ... . a;, ��-
,.�-. __ ___ . �.
� , . . : _.
_ ,. , y
�
�vs, `�
�A .. �
..,, �`;✓, '!
Staff Report �;�
� Agenda 5. 3
Tiga.rd Planning Commission '
� Au�ust 3, 1976
. �'.
Pa�e 3 �?
�;;,
20 . Al1 remain.ing aspec�ts of the development be con:;tructed �:�i
to applicable health, subdivision and zoni.ng• codes. �'
�'�''�
21 . All uses �ermitted outrigh�t in the Community Plan zone }!
be permitted in the planned development . ;i�
�:.
r?
22 . Architectural compatability be defined before the '
General Plan is adopted. l`''
FINllINGS : �''`
l . The applicant is requesting appr.oval of a commercial office :'''
planned development to allow office uses and limited associated �<'
uses . `
;
2 . Except for t�3ose listed below, the eonditions o� the p.re- �
�� 1 iminary appxoval h�.ve been �.nc;orpoxa�ted into the General Plan s:�`
and Program or are satis:fied during construction and de�i�n ;;
review.
r:
i;!
(6) No mention is made in the program for the setback trom E !
�� SW 72nd Avenu�. �i
.t: E;
(7) The program mentions an er�ergency acc:,ess but no location 4;
� is established. ��:
�„
�.,
�.�
(11) The �,pplicant wishes to mai.ntain the i;rafficjpedestrian
separation by the provision of the perimeter patrY inste�.d ����;
of si�dEwalks along the in�ternal street. �
;;.
;
(13) No �ravision fcar acc�ss combin�.tion is shown.
(15) Drainage needs to b� provided onto the Highway 217 right- ; j
af-wa,y. ?;;
(21) The applzcant has provided a list of zndu�trial uses }!
that tlie� are proposing. ;
;.�,
3. A11 of the pronosed la.nd �zsPS 1i�ted in the pragram ax° not y`�
apprapriate for i;lzis site and can be m�re properly l�cated in 4..;
other areas already zoned. I�owever, for. their use, therE ;;:
are some small �cale, limited ass�mk�l� uses that could func�;ion �;;.
in the pro�osed development . This can be handled best by i+:
m�.king any use other tli�,n those all�Wed in tlle C-P zone a ''
conditional u�e. However, gen.eral i_nc�ustrial uses will not �"
be compatible with the a�cess provided or the s�tting of tkse �3
r.: office park.
�v
��.';.
���
i?;
�� � � �� � '�
�'�
�
,�.�.:. ��.;,
�taf f Report ��> �.
A�enda 5. 3
' Tigard Planning Commission
��,TAugust 3, 1976
` Pag� 4
4 . 7.'he applica,nt is proposirig the creat�,on of 15 1ots.
Subdivision appr.oval is necessary.
5 . �ccess could be provided o;ff SW Varns Str�et for lots 9,
10, and 11 but through access betwPen Varns and the interior
street should be restricted t� avoi.d the u,se of these parcels
' as informal access into and out of the project . I
I
�
CON(;LUSIONARY FINDINGS:
l � The proposal for a commercial o�fice park with associated
uses and dec�ication of addii;ional ri�ht;-of-way is consistent
witYi the Tigard Community Plan . �
i
2 . `1'he noted deviations to the Tigarcl ll�unicipal Code are �
wa.rranted by �the projeets design, amenities and l.imited type� �
u�es allowed. �
3. The proposal is in lzarmony with the surrounclir�g area with �
the adc3itional. setk��.ck f.rom SW 72nd Avenue and the retention i
o� mu�h of the existing vegetation. "
;.
�
4 . Altlnougli the development wil7. be in individual ownerships,
�� ' the open space will be guaranteed by the maximum lot coverage
(60%) proposed iri the General Pl�,n and Program.
5. Th� controll�d mixing o� uses with generous setbacks woul.d
not have been possible without the �arcel develnping as a ;4
planned dEVelopment . ��
F. The applicant has �tated their ability to sub�tantially ��
com lete the ublic im rovements ortion of the ro ect wi�hi.n °
� � � P � p p p� � J � ��r:
one year with the individual tenants building as the seperate
lats are sold. �
� � ���
'7. The applicant has demonstrated a, ��ublic need �o� a plannPd r'
development of srna11 , owner-occ,u�ied commercial officas and: `};:
associated uses. f'
a.
r.
;
,�
8 . There is a public benefit to have the� parcel in questian �
develop as a commercial affice p�.rk as oppased to �encral `'
�;.
iridustrial uses. t;
�
9. llue to i�he extPnsive natural vegetation, the si�e in question �
is u:niquely suited �or a comn�ercial of.fice park. �
�;
l
�'
:�:
� �;
,
�
i;
�
�
' �
�,.. . . .
, �� _ , .:.�„ . . . . _ .,.,... ,..::.�.:.�„ ,,:m. a....�,:�. ._.
� �:, �::..
�, Agenda 5. 3
t� August 3, 1976
STAFF RFCOMNtENDATIQNS:
Staff rec�mmends approval with the following conc�i.tions;
1. The signing program for the entire park be subject to
Design Review Eoard approval.
2 . That twenty feet along SW 72nd Avenue be dedicated for the
future widening of SW 72nd Av�nue to arterial starzdards,
3. An a�reement to participate in a local improvement district;
for the improvement o� SW 72nd to City sta,nda.rds to an
arterial street and the same type of agreement be attacYzed
to lots 9, 10 and 11 to bring Varns Street lzp to City local j
street standards. i
�
9: . A covenant to 1;he deed.s for lots 1-�3, 12 and 13 Ue execu�:ed �
prohibi�ing access to SW 72rid and SW Varns Streets. Lots }
9, 10 anci 11 which will haae access to S .W. Varris �h�,ll be
r�stricted from having thraugh access to the int�rnal str�et.
5. The setback from SW 72nd Avenue be �0 ' with a �0 ' intrusion
,�'_;
allowable for no more than 1/3 af the lot width, if no other
�easible option is available.
6. A 10 ' wide emergency vehicle access be pravided alorig either
lot 10 �r 11 on a pedestrian path or tc� Ue constructed with
6 inches o-� base rock overladen with ��d and signed at both
SW Varns Street and the unnamed interiar roac� .
7. The internal street with a 20 ' pavement width be constructed
to city standards for commercial streets and signed for no t
parking. �
8. The bus turnout lane k�� dedicat�d and improved as part o� �
the SW 72nd Av�enue local improvement district. �
�i
�
9 . Wheelchair. ramps be canstrLicted to cii;y standards at the �
northwest corner of lc�t 12, �outhwe�t and �au�kzeast cerr.Ar �
of Lot 13, the n�rthWest and northea,st .r.,orner. of I,nt 1 and �
the street median . �
�
10 . A �ive foot utility easement be provided along all lot lin.es �
�
as dPed�d. �
11 . Access to lots 2, �, an� 12 be combined. with adjat�ent lots '
and access to lot 9 be cornbined with lat 8. Access �o lots �
14 and 15 be provicled on the north and soutli xespectively
�, and acce�s to lots 1 and. 13 be f.r.�m the intearnal r�ad, not
�" the entrance way. ,
�
�
, . � .,.. ,
,. �
_.,,. ,:� , .� �.
� : , .,.. -
�. �k;.
._. �:....
Agenda 5, 3
' August 3, 1976
�� Page � ,
�
12 . The storm drainage and retention system be ap.proved by
the City Engineering vepartment, Washington County Depart-
ment of Fublic Works �,nd the State Highway Department .
13. A street opening permit onto SW 7�nd be acquir�d from
Washington (,ounty Depa.rtment of Publ��c Works.
14. A street lighting plan to city standards be approved by
P.G.E.
15. A11 autright permitted uses allowed in the commerc�ial-
professiona.l zone be permitted and small-scale, limited
resea,rch and development type of non-poll.uti�zg industry
i.n acc,ordanc� with th� conditional use chapter of the
Tigard Municipal Code.
l�i. All �emainimg aspec�s of the devel�pment be constructed
to applicable health, su'bdiviszon �,nd zoning codes.
�.�_�
i
';
�
�
,
�
i
� �� ;
i
}
i
I
i
I
�
�
,
,
i
l
r
���� . � . � . .. . . . � . � �.
. � . . . .. . . . . ;�
. � . � � �� � . � . � � . . � � �.. � � � � � . �. � �
� � � � , _. . - . � . . . � � � .. . � . . . .�.�{
� . . . � . �. . . _ � . � � . . . �. � 4
. � . . . . � . . . . . � . � . . . . . � . � . . �. �
�. . . . . . . . .... ..-��
��. . . � . . . � .. . . . . . � , . . '._'.R
. . .. . ..., .�. , . .,. . .,, , :�. ..... . .�,..... ., ... ,��,,,
, .. . . . , ,:�. �, �; .,
. .. j. , .... . ..
r
i� �
y �
STAFF REPOR,T �
Agenda 5.4
,_ Tigard Planning Commission
-� Au ust 13 197G
�,
g ,
Twalit Junior Hi h S -
Y �
chool Lecture Room
Ti ard �re on
g
, �'
DOCKET: CONDITIONAL USE CU-21-?6
REQU�ST: To locate a Fabric Store in a C-3 zone.
LOCATION: 1274G-12760 S .W. Pacific Highway in the Village Square
APPLICANT: Norris and Stevens, Realtors
BASIC FACTS :
' o The site is zoned C-3 (General Commercial) and designated
Commercial Highway in the Neighborhood Plan (NPO) I Plan.
0 18. 72.010 0� the Tigard Municipal Code states that in granting
approval o:C a conditional use the Planning C�mmission may
require, in addition to t,he regulations and standards expressly
speci�iecl in. this ti.tle, other conditions found necessary to
protect the best interest of the surrounding property or
nea.ghborhood or the city as a whole .
o NPO I findings on the Paci�ic Highway Commercial Ar�a state
�.� that businesses located on any strip highway are prima.rily
divided into two general catagories : those oriented to the
pass:ing traffic and those serving daily shopping needs of the
residential community. The Iatter type of business is poorly
located on the strip because it is a generator of shopping
tra�fic, drawing people to it from the surrounding communii�y
� for their every day shopping rieeds. Therefore, the highway
oriented businesses should have priority use of thorough
fare froz�.tag�e because tlzey rely on thE pa.ssing motorist and
affer service for thorough traffic while minimi.zing the
at�traction of additional neighborhood traffic„
o Policy 19 (NPO I) states that "In th� interest af sa:�ety and
ef�e�ti2ncy, the izumLer oF nighways access points must be
ke�t to a minimum. Whenever possible, bu�inesses on Pacific
Highway should be clustered and share common parking facilities
and d.riveways. "
0 18 .28 .040 of the Tigax•d 141unicipal Code item #1 - the minimum
front qard shall be 10 feet, landsca.ped and maintained.
0 18 .28.060 Tigard Municipal Code item #3 - a minimurn of 15%
of the total lot area shall be landscaped.
0 18.58.060 item #1 -� Tree and shrub plantings wathin parliing
areas shall be provided and maintained at approximately 70 '
on center each way.
L.... .. . ,,_._ _ �_..... ,., --- - _
r� .�.,
' �`�� �::,
Staff Report
Agenda 5.4
Tigard Planning Commission
� August 3, 197G
Page 2
FINDIr1GS :
o The proposed Fabric World will occupy a 14,400 square .foot
space pr�viously occupied by a Wigwam and a Plaid Pan�try '
store.
o 'i'he Village Square complex pre-existed thP code.
o The surrounding land uses are a drive-in restaurant to the
south, a medical/dental cliilic to the north, service station
and lumber yard directly across Pacific Highway.
o Heritage Village at the present time is occupied by offices,
beauty school, and a small bookstore, a �airy Queen is also
located on the site at thQ corner of Pacific and McKenzie.
o TYie site has 2 - 30 ' curb cuts on S.W. Pacific and 1 - 30 '
curb cut on D4cKenzie .
o The sit� has a 5 foot sidewalk _located along the cu.rb. There
is no landscape buffer along Pacific or McKenzie and no
landscaping in the pa.rking lot .
��..
o Signs on the site consist of :
0 one free �tanding sign which s�rves all the i;enants. There
is no uniformity to the signs and it presently contains
one illegal sign and one abandoned sign.
i
0 one prajective sign advertizing t17E Plaid Pantry. This
sign is illegal acc�rding 16.40.070 item 6 ( "No projecti.ng �
sign shal.l extend more than three feet above the roof line �
at tlze wall o� the top of a parapet wa7.l whichever is
higher. ") �
�
o AdequatE parking is available :for th� proposed use. �
o The intr�duction o:� a fabric store in this shopping area is /
com�atable with th� surroiznding Pxisting uses. �
t
o The site is we11 suited for the proposed use in that a �
.fabric stoz•e is a low traffic generator and it is nat locatec�
directly on Pacii'ic Hwy. Therefore the proposed use conforms
to the NP I .
�
� F
,.
� _ , . .. :.._ . , ._ .
, ,� � _�.,_
, , ,,. . . ,..:;�,. . .. . . , . .
. ,. . . . - .... _ . � . I,
� ��; ��
��,
r ��, �:
;:ii
Sta�f Report
F��
F�i
�.� Agenda 5.4
Ti�;arci Planning Commission
� ;.
August 3, 1976 �I;
i��°
�r:,;
��;
S�'AF:E' RECOMNIEPIDATIOI�TS; � `
� �,.
€: :
Staff recommends appraval with the �ollowing conditions; ( :�
t.;�;
o that a seven foot landscape strip be established k�etween {�i
t;
th� sidewalk and the parking area. `;:,',
�,:,:;
o that tile soutllern most curb cut be clased and replaced by E''
��.
sidewalk. This would leave a eentrally placed curb cut �'f�
on Pacific and one an McKenzie Street which actually� serves �°�
as a driveway for the center. � '
;;;`';;:
o tlzat �the north front of th.e k�uilding not being used far 1 �`
parking or walkway (eircled in red on the plan) be �.'��
landsc�.ped. �.'�
;;:1
a that planting str;_ps be estalalished at approxima�tel� 70 ' �.`'
orz center each way in the parking lot . �;`,�i
€�P-
,�� o that tlze tenants of Village Square work together on forming m ,
�, one sign that would satisfy their existing and future needs, r','
���
o that the illegal signs on site be removed. ;�;
�:"'i1
�:��
` a that tize pro�osed sign anct landscape �lan be subject to ,^ ;
Des�.gn Review. ��',',�
�: �i
�.,,y,;
� ;:.;.
�;��r:y
;:,_
i -_
i•.,`i
� . � � ii�l�,:1
;,„'�
� . . . � 1::.`:'i�i
. � � � �t.ii;,
� r,
u,,
c-r.i
, . . . . . ..��yp'f
�::
� . . . � . .Fi•::'.":
k�'
i!�?.
Y..
�'
s�
��.
. . . �`f.::::
fFy 1.
�t e
� . � .. . ����
.. . . .. . . ��r
�1,�6k
�.��� . � .. . ..Ai!
�
� � . � . . . . � t
� . � . � .. . � . . � . :f!�f.
. . . . . . . . ... . . . ' .'.t�k
� . � � . . . . . . . . . .:�I�:;'
. � � . .. � . .. �,�
� � . . . . . � . � .� . .. � . . � . . � .. .. �. �i
. . . .. . . � �+.
. � . . . . . . . .
� �� . .. . � � . . . . .. .. . . . . . '��
... . � � � . . .� � � . . . � . . � . . . . .
�� � ;;._. . ,�y �.,,�n.,..:.. ,� . ��.,.
� .� . _. ... . ., .. _,�. . . ,_ :�.,.�
.. . ,. , �,,. �.,.-� �C ,-. �
�".....:. . . . . . � . . . ..:. � ..'. '�-��� --- —
� i
�' �_..
H'
STAFF REPORT
�1` Agenda 5, 5
Tigard Planning Commission
August 3, 1y76
Twality Jr. High School
Tigard, Oxegon
' DOCKET: NCU 1.-76
REQUEST: To reinstate a lumber storage shed as a non-conforming use.
LOCA'i'ION: 11675 SW Pacific I-Iighway
APPLICANT: Marine Lumber Company
BASIC FACTS:
l . The site is designated General Indizstrial on the Tigard
Community Plan and zoned C-3, Gener.al Commercial .
2 . The proposed use is listed as a conditional use in the C-3
zone.
3. Section 1�306� .020 authorizes tYie Planning Commission t� re-
instate or resume a discontinued non-con�oxmi.ng use "if the
, non-conforming use �or structure� is destroyed or damaged by
' a cause of the extent requir.ing the discontinuanc� of the
� use while a�fecting repaix�s. The future structure or use
on the propex^ty shall con.form to the provisian of this title
unless reiri,�tatemezlt of the original structure as specifically
approved by the Plannin� Commission. " i
4. The proposed buildixlg is to be located one foot fr�m the �
adjoining residential zone (A-Z) where 10 fee�t of side yard ;
�etk�ack is required. Th� origin�,l building which Y�urned �
on June l, 1976 was located in the same locat:ian tlaat the �
applicant is proposing to place a lumbPr storage shed. �
;
�
FzNDINGS : ;
,
1 . Th� applicant is proposing to i�construct appraxim�:tely a �
4000 square .foot .lumiaPr storage shed to replace th� one
destroyed by �;n alleged a.rsonist on June l, 1,976. Tf '
allowed, the structure is to be located on the exiSting �
foundation oi' the building destroyed k�y fire. ;
2. The existin� use is a 7_umber yard and retail sales on a .85
acre parcel . �
�
,
3. The surrounc�ing land use is vacant land with single residential '
uses north acr.oss Pfaffle S� . and Pacific Hwy, to the south. }
'�' �. The app].icant has stated that the lumber storage shed woul.c� 1,
eonstitute approxirnately 9%o of �he total valuati�n at the I
site and that the inabil.ity �o .r,einstitute the storage shed �
would create a ha�^dship and be de�remental to the remaining �
�
i
,
;
�
: �
,.,,..N..... , .,, _: �W ,�
� , _,__n. ___�..�_�_._�.�
� . _ ..
�, �,,.., . , .
r? r`r"
_�� �;�.
� Staff Report
Agenda 5. 5
Tigard Planning Commission
� August 3, 1976
Page 2
91% investment on the site.
5 . Section 18 .28.040 of the Tigard Mun�cipal Code requires a I
side yard setback of 10 ' when abutting a residential zone.
The lot to the west is zonecl A-2, Multi-Family Residential .
The applicant has stated his intent to adjust the property
line so as to provide the �ire seperation required by the
Liniform Building Code for this type of structure.
6. The applicant has stated that the impact on public services
and the adjacent sites and immediate neighborhood will be
no more than the original building.
�;;;
i
. ;
,
�
i
�:
�
�. �
,�r
D
� ,..... _
I r (�; {���
`�'vr.. '�`.,.r��
e
Agenda 5.5
: �� Tigard Planning Commission
� August 3, 1976
STAFF ftECOMMEAIDATIONS
Staff recommends a;pproval with the following conditions:
]. . A landscape plan be submitted to Design Review Board which
includes sight obscuring plar�tings along the north and west
property lines ancl an attempt be made to provide some land-
sca,ping in the front of the building adjacent Ffaffle and
, Pacific where a lU foot landscaped setba.ck is required.
2. That five feet o� additional right of way be dedicated on
S.W. Pfaffle For future street widening.
�.
;
�•
, �. _ . _—
� � � ���
..,h �._ �.. �
' S'T'AF'F REPORT ��
� Agenda F. l ��t
Tigard Planning Commission ��
August 3, 1976 ��;;
Twality Junior Iiigh Schoal. �:;;
Tigard, Qregon �,
.;,
DOCKET; MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 3-76 �,;{
�;�.
_ REQUEST: To partition a 5. 3 acre parcel into a 3.04 �.nd a Z. 26 acre ���'-'
par�el with center line of Fanno Cr�ek as the common lot boundary. �°
r�8 �'
LOC,ATION: SW Hill St . east of SW Ash St . (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2�; �;
t.
tax lot 200) .
�.,:
�'.:;
;;,
APPLICANT: J. A. Atwood Cor.p. i<;
4:'.-;
]3AS IC FACTS: i+'
t�;
1 . The site is d�signated as Urban-Medium Dens:ity Residential- k;;'
Duplex oz� the iveighborh�od Plan I and zoned A-2, Multi- �;'
Family Residentia.l and M-4, Industrial Park. �;j;
Ei
k'�
2. The site is presently vacant . �:'
�':':;
i;;�,
FINDINGS : ��;;
;;::
�� 1 . This parcel has been sold and deeds recorded without receiving L'
approval from city of Ti�ard for the lotting pattern . When �`'
noti�ied of i;he problem the applicant �ubmitted a request �or ���
�, partitioning. A lotting pattern for, this parcel was denied �"�
by the Plaz��ning Commission on June l, 19r16, and �.ppealed to �:
the City Council . It was the conclusion of the City CounciZ �",
at the June 28, 1976 hearing that matters not o� ciir�ct impact ,,;
on the partitioning were c�nsidered by the Planning Commission �:;
and tnat it should be remanded back to the Planning Commi.ssi�n �'
f�i th�ir considerati�n revi�win� only the lotting si�e , access �'�
ancl its conformance to the Neigliborhood Pla,nning C�rganization I . Pa`'
The developm�nt being propased was deemed a zoning matter. �"'
3
,�
2, A :fill permit was �_ssu.ed by tlae city in February 1.976 to fi11 ��:
the area above 148 ' inean sea level. which has been determined �;,;
by the city to be the l0U year flo�cl plaiia on Fanno Creek. ,'
3. The loti;ing �attern as proposed pr�vides access to both parcel�; �;:
�: The mini�um lot size of each respect;ive z�ne is being adhered
�;
to in this request . ��
�Y�
5. Although the NPO #I plan prohibits construction �f multi-- ��
f.amily units in this area until such time as either Hill St . �;
ox A:sh St . is extended or SW Frewi�� St . is improved the �;
p�,rtition�.ng is a seperate matter. Legal counsel has advised ��
IXv
�.;; that devPlc�pment of the site and non-conformity with the ��
comprehensive p.lan regarding land use can be handl�d at the �'
time of c�evelopment request {primarily at the Design Review �
�
�
� ��{
, �_:
�- Sta.ff Report
Agenda 6. 1
�.~ Tigar.d Planning Commission
August 3, 1976
Page 2
step in the process) .
�
CONCLUSIONARY FINDING:
i
l. The request conforms to the dimensional r.equirements of j
the Ti�ard Municipal Code and Neighborhood Plan Organization I
I .
�
�
�
�
�
�
s
�
k
;�
�.
�
;` �
�- .
��..
���
�
��
;�
�
�� � �� �������
�
�;
i�
�'
�
�
�
�
�
t
�
�
[
�
�,
� ' i
{
4
;
I
- 1
i.
i
�
�
-----�.-._ , . ,
,.,.
�:, ti� ,
r 4ti„
a
��`� Agenda 6. 1
�-' Tigard Planni.ng Commission
Aizgust 3, 1976
STAFF F3,T�COio7MENDATIONS :
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
l . A pedestrian/bike pa,th easement be provided on both sides
of �,anno Creek.
2. That $4.00jlineal foot for future development of a bikE
path along Fanno C;reek be placed on accaunt with the City.
3. That the flooc� �l�.in area be clea:red and maintained as '
useable open space by rPSpective owners of the lots in
question.
,::
�
i
�
�
I
i
'i
i
i
i
;
�
�
'I
; i