Planning Commission Packet - 03/02/1976 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
' �� � ... . . � . � . .����^f �:� . ., . ...
�
�e
/
NOTICE UF PUBLIC kIEA12ING
AGENDA
Tigard Planning Gommission
March 2, 7.976 - 7;30 P.M,
Twality Junior High School - lecture room
14650 S.W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of Febr.uary 17, 1976, meeting
4. COI�MUNICATIONS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.1 CUNDITIONAL CJSE PERMIT - CU 10-76 (Scherr)
A request by Michael. Scherr for permi.ssion to aperate a
billiard parlor and equipment sales establishment at 1276Q
S.W. Paczfic Hi�hway (Washington County tax map 2S1 2BD, I
�y tax 1oL- 1503)
5.2 �ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT KENEWAL - CCJ 4-74 (Grahn)
A request by Roger Grahn for reinstatement of a previousl.y
granted permission to construct a duplc�x in an R-7 single
f�mily zone approximately 500 feet s�utheast of Ash Avenue. i
(Washington County tax map 2S1 2DB, tax lot 2300).
5.3 VARIANCE - V 1-76 (Beno1)
A request by Beno1, Inr, for a var.iance of t1�e front yard
setback requirements in a C-3 z�ne (general commercial) section �
18.28.1J40 of the Tigard Municipal Code, for addi.tions to the {
Safeway store (Tigard Shopping P1aza) at 250 Txgard P1aza i
(Washington County tax map 1S1 35DD, tax lot 2100) i
i
5.4 SIGN CODE APPEAL - SCA 1-76 (Lionel Co. )
An app�al to the Planning Commission of the denial tif a
ermit to construct a new xo'ectin and revolvin s,i n at
P P J g �
g
. .
- 12285 S.W. Ma�.n Street (Jahnson Building), ,
5.5 SIGN CODE REVISION ° SCR 1-7b '
;
A proposal to amend the Tigard Sign Code {Ch. 16, TMC) to
� establi.sh free-standing sign size standar.ds according to f
traffic speed and number of travel lanes and to eliminate
free-standing sign size restrictions based on lot fronY.age; '�
also to r.educe the maximum permissable height to 25' . ;
s
_ ;
i
_ _ J
,
... �,
, ° ,_ _ >
.,k . . . . . � � � .. . � � . . � � '-;:
! . . . �. . � . . .. . . . �,_ �. , .
page 2
PC Agenda �
, li
µ March 2, 1976
5.b ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMErdT - ZO.A 1-76 (Parking)
(Tabled from the February 17, 1976 meeting)
A pro,posed amendment to the Tigard Municipal Gode, C"hapter l$.60
(Paxking) t� reflect stand3rds and criter2:a for off-street parking.
, 5.7 SUBDIVISI�N PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCE - S 1-76 (Englewood EII)
' A request f.or preliminary pl.at approval and a variance of the
t subdivision: code pxavisions requira.ng sidewalks on both sides
i. of the street fox ENGLEWOOD III, a p�roposed third phase sub-
; division and develapment o£ the Englewood Planned DeveloPment,
� vininity of S.W. 115th and Springwovd Drive. (Washin:gton County
tax map 1S1 34B, tax .lots 6�0 and 602)
� °6. PRE�TM�NARY PLANNED �EV�LOF'MENT R�VZk�W
6.1 PRELIMINARY REV'IEW 2C 1-76 (Carpenter)
A request by Gordon Carpente•r for concept approval of a proposed
residenti.al planned development in the va.r..a.n.a.ty of I1535 S.W. 98ti1
(Washingtan County tax map 1S1 35C, �ax 1ot 900},
- 6.2 PRELZMINARY REVIEW ZC 2�76 (Kjelgaard)
A r.equest by Orland Kjelgaard far concept approval of a
proposed res'i_de�tial pl.anned deveLopment in the vicinity of
13778�1384� S.W. Ha11 Blvd. (Washington County tax map 2S1 2DD,
t�A lot 500j.
7, OTHE:R BUSINESS
I �
8. ADJOURNMENT
l
�
!
i
:r�
1
:I
`
i
;;
'; j
' ,
�
,�
- ;
;
- '.
i � � � � �
�.
'�
,
w. _ _ _ ��%�� �
;;
> �. , ,
� r,:,
{� Y�
��'
dl
MINUTES
Tigard Planning Commission �
�: March 2, 1976 - 7;30 p.m. �
Twality Junior High School - leeture room i
14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregorl 1
�
l. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by (
Commissi�ner Popp in the absence of Chairman �
Porter. �
�
2� ROLL CAI�L: Presen:t: F�ns, Moore, Nicoli, Popp, Sakata, Wakem, �
Goldbach; staff; Powell and Laws �
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of February 17, 1976, were �
approved as read. '
y ' on of Commissioner �
� 4. COMMUNIC,ATIONS: PowE11 reported the resi�nati s
Smelser and o� Mra 1'owell from the planning staff. �
5. PUBLIC HEARSNGS �
5.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU 10-76 (Sherr) �
i
A request by Michael Sherr for� per•mission to operate a
billiard p�.rlor and equipment sales establishment at 12760
SW Pacific Hwy. (Wash. Co. tax map 2S1 2BD, tax Iot 1503) ,
i
� ��
A. Staf� Report: read by P4well.
B. Applicant Presen.tation
o Mr. Sherr� stated that there v�as a n�ed in the commun.ity
, for �n. establish.ment of the nature he proposed; ��h�.t
his establishment wauld provide a servicP needed in
the c�mmunity, particu.larly to the youths. He stated
there were 18 parking spaces a.n �ront of his building
and tho�e spaces were ad.equate for their needs.
C. Public Testimony: n� on appeared.
D. Staff Recommendation:
DENIAL, based on findings that parking provided was.
not adequate for the proposed use and �hat permission
of the proposed use wotild require the Village Square
' development to fall below the number of spaaes re--
quired for each establishment.
E. Rebutta�
o Mr. Sherr contend�d that the 18- parking stalls he
had avail.able would be reserved �or the use of his
( establishment. I
� _ _ N
f',_ �
�a%.-. �
page 2
PC Minutes
� March 2, 1976 ��
��.
f
F. Gommission lliscussion an�. Action i'
�I
o Nicoli asked if the present parkin� would be adequate �
far the proposed use. �
o Staff sta�ted that it would, proba'�ly, but that week- �
end operation of the �'lea market would conflict with �
the proPosed billi�.rd parlor in. that their peak j
operation. hours would coincirle.
i
o Ems stat�d he was not aware af any parking problem on i
i that site as he had never se�n a de�'icit of parking �
availability.
o Sakata asked Sherr how much landscaping he was pro-- ;
poaing, what his hours of operation were, what '
signing he would use and if h.e had looked tor alter-
n.ativ�e sites o
�
o Chairman Papp directed Mr. Sherr to an��ver.
o Sherr z���pon.d�d that �.is hours o.f operation would
I be 12 noon to rnidnight! 7 daya a wee�i; that he would
�;, �y use the existin.g signs an th.e premises; that he had
anticipated provi�.ing Iandscaping a�ong the edge of
the sidewalk, between the sidewa.lk and the parking
areas and that he had looked for� ��her �reas to lo-
cate this �sta'blishznent.
i � Moore as.ked the applican� if he was �resently oper-
;
a�ting a similar typ� business.
a Sherr respanded that he was not presently operatin.g
this kind of business.
a Sakata stated she did not feel the site was suitable
for the estab7.ishment pr��osedy
o Goldbac�. aoncurred.
o Moore stat�d he felt the proposed occupancy load
would clearly excePd the av�ailak�ility of parkin�,
even if the sites menti_oned by the applicant were
reserved.
o EYns stated that the Commission, he �elt, was �eaching
beyond what the code required for parking; that there
was only a partial conflict o� hours of' operatiora and
�- the Commission ought to approve a conditional use
su.b ject to a,nnual. review.
_ . , _ .
�-=_-- - - --- _
�'r;,' �,,,,,
��
Pa�e 3 �a:,
PC Minutes
,.,. March ?_, 1976
z�
o Nicoli stated he would be in favor of the proposal
provided th� manager of the property allocated.
areas of parking for each tenan.�.
a Motion (Sakata) for denial based on. the inappropri�
a-teness of the site and the lack of sufficient parking.
o �econded (Moore) .
o Motion failed to carry for lack of � majority-- F�ns,
Nicoli and Popp, nays.
o Motion (Ems) for the matter to be mov�d to a .later
time on �tlze agenda so that the applicant could count
the number of par,king spaces on the si.te and the
i
num�er of cars therP at the present tim�.
o Mo-tion died for lack of a seconc�.
o Popp asked if there were near'by areas where parking ;
could be accommodated.
�
a
o Staff replied there wEre not, besides, it wouldnft
� make an,y dif.ference e �
� Popp sugges��d staff un.der�take a study of the par,k- �
� ing needs of the businesses in that arPa and x�� art
back to the Commissi.on.
P
'� o Nicoli concurred with Popp�s suggestiono
i
o Moore stated that he saw an addition.al possible }
, problem with respect to pedestrian traffic crossing �
Pacific Hwy. , particularly young people.
o Motion to table for fu.rther consideration (Sakata) , r�
i
o Seconded (Moore) . �
o Motion carried un.animously. t�
f
5.2 CONDTTIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL CU: 4-74 (Grahn) � �
47
A request by Roger Grahn for reinst�tement of a previously �'•
granted permission to construct a duplex in an R-7 (singl.e E:
family residential zane) approxima�tely 500 ft. sautheast �;
of Ash Avenue (Wash. Co. tax map 251. 2DB, �ax 1ot 2300) .
�
A. Staff Repor�t: read by Powell. Staf� read � letter fram
� homeowners in Burn.Yiam Park in opposition '
to the proposed use, into �che record. I{
6i;
�..
`�i
� . .. � . . I`;
�
i
� � f.'}
page 4
PC Minutes
March 2, 1976
�.,
B. Applicant Preseritation
o Mr. Grahn appeared and stated -that the le�,ter
from the px�ior own.er of the property, Mr. Pruitt,
explicitly states that a duplex was permitted pn
the site and that the proposal would not have an
advers� ef�ec�L on surroundin� properties.
o Staff asked Mr. Grahn a�aout the dimensions af the
lot and if those dimensions had been changsd after
the �JJr'@VlOL1S conditional use permit was granted.
� Staff pointed out that that action yvould have in-
valid�ted th.e conditional use anyway.
C. Publia Te�tianony
o Nlr. Dick Siever, SW Hill St. , .�tated �triat he was
aware �that a duplex was going to be built, but he
w�.s apposed ta it.
� Mr. William Hooper, SW Burnllam Cte , stated that he
was no� aware thdt a duplex was to be constructed
and he was opp�sed.
��_ '
o Mr. Kenneth �tewart, SW Burnham Ct. , stated he w�s
opposed ta the dupl�x.
� Mr. Pau1. Johnson opposed duplex �onstructi.on as being
detriin�ntal to �the neighborhaoci.
o L�an Feller, SW Fxewing St. , stated that he felt
duplex constructian was not necessarily detrim�n�al,
but that clevelopmen:t o� the area, wi.th only on�
access (Frewing) was und��irab]_e.
o Russ Au�tin, Building Official �or the City of Tigard,
stated that he was oppos�d to the Frapased duplex.
He felt that the condition.al use perm.i� had expired;
that t:h:e 1.ot had been altered since the nriginal
conditional use permit had been o'btained and. that
the pr�sent lot does not confox7m w�th the existing
l�t requireme,nts in an R-7 �one.
D� Staff Recommendatian: DENIAL
E. Rebuttal: none
, F, Comtnission Discussion an:d Action
� o Motion for denial (Sakata) on the basis of goints
raised by the �iuilding Official.
� ��;� � . � �
,
�:.
� �.,�,��,1_-
page 5
PC Minutes
March 2, 19�76 ���
�7 ;
�
o Seconded (Moore)
o Approved unanimously ,
,
�
5.3 VARIANCE V �-76 (Benol, Inc. ) F
c
A request by Benol, Inc. for a variance af -the front yard �
setback rec�uirements in a C�3 �one for addition� to a Safe- �
way Store at 250 Tigard P1aza. �
A. Staff Report: read by Powell. �
.�
B. Applicant Presentation: 'j
c� Mr. Oliver, property owner, gave a bri�f history ��
of �he ait�, the reasons fa�° requesting the variance
and stated the hardships th�.t woul.d be incurr�d were !
;�
th� variance denied.
��
�l
C;, Public Testimany: none ;;
D. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL, based on findings th�t �"
no �dditional adverse impact will result from -the t�
� variance; �that the variance wi.11 not contravene tka.e �'.
purposes of t�:e zonirlg ordinanc€ and that a hax�dsl�ip
would be created by strict application. o� the set-
back r�quirements, on th� conditions tha�:
l. LandsGaping and screenin.g required b�r code :�
adjacent resid�n.tial uses behind the shopping �=�
aenter be prQVic�.e�d. ��
�r
�. A 10 ft. front lan:dscape se�t:back be provided, per ;�'�
code, c�n SW Paci�ic Hwy� and SW Hall }31vd, , but !_
not including the areas of the existing or pro- `'?
�:_
posed buildingso �;:
3. That shad� -trees be provided zn the paa�king areas.
�}
i,
E. Rebuttal �.`
o Mr. Oliver s`tated that staff�s recommendatic�n would ���
resul-t in eliminat�on of some oF the existing parking ��?
and that wa�zld cr�ate problems for the tenan.ts. g�
�
o Powell 1skmake1landsca a�recon�tineent�ontDesign.dRev�ew ��
to simp y p g g
Board approval would. be more sat;isfactory to 'him. ' �;;
� � �� ���
�. o Mr. Oliver stated tha-L- that wou��. prob�.bly make no #.
�;
�
�
,
�
. u ., ,� . �.
� �...,:
�
.�..a . �:.
_ ,�,._�_ _
p���.:..��..�.
`�. page 6 �ay.,
PC Minta.tes
March 2, 1976
��'.
difference, that the staff conditions, i� they pro-
vided :�or preser-vation of parking, would be perfectly
acceptable.
o Moore asked NIr. Oliver how many of the existing
trees on the site to the rear would remain after
development.
o Nlr. Oliver responded by indicating the trees which
woulcl remain.
o Popp as.kecl Nrhere the px�oposed riew cur'b cuts would
be in the rear of_ the building.
o Mr. Oliver pointed out i;�ie loca�.io,� of the curb cu-l;s.
o Nicoli asked if 6 ft. of 1a?zdscaped arPa adjacent
Hall Blvcl. wauld all�w the parking to remai.n.
o Staff �esponded that -they felt that it wou.ld.
F. Commission Discussion and Action
o Popp stated he felt the parki.ng sta.11s that presently �
� exist should not be eliminated, but that �. landscape �
strip should be accommodated.
�
� o Moore said he felt landsca in and �
p' g parking should be
subject to Design Review Board approval.
�
i o Motion for approval (Sakata) with staff condition.s,
i but modifyin.g con.dition #2 to include the provision ;
that parking not be sacrificed for landscapi_n.�. ��
�
�
' o Seconded (Goldbach) . ;'
';
o Motion approved unan.imously. �
5.4 SIGN CODE APPE�L SCA 1-76 (Lionel Co. ) J
`;
A request by the applicant to leave this previousllr-tabled �I
item on the table until his return from vacation was �i
�ccepted by the chairman. �!
ij
5.5 SIGN CODE REVISION SCR 1-76 �'
�!
�.
A propnsal �i;a arnend °�he Tiga,i�cl Sign Cade, Chapter 16.36, �`�
4,
Tigard Municipal Code, to establish free-standing sign �:,
size standards according to traffic sp�ed and number of �'
travel lanes and to eliminate freP-standing sign size t�
�,
restrictions based on lot fron�tage; also reducing the +�
� maximum permissible height to 25 ft. an.d clarifyin� aize �;
k
�J
C'
�I
�
L
�.
�. . . . . .: � . . . . . . � � . . ..
page 7
�.�:,
PC Minutes
March 2, 1976
�,'
restric�tions of wall signs.
o Motion to table (Sakata)
o Seconded (Nicoli)
o Motion approved unanimously
o (The Commissiori��.^s indi.cated their intent to study
the matter further and tn place the sign code re--
vision on the next age�.da� .
5.5 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 1-76 (Parking)
(Tabled from F�bruary 17, 1976)
A proposed amendment �o the Ti.gard Nunicipal Code, Chapter
18.60 - Parking - -to reflect standards and cri-teria f�r
of�-street parking
A. Commissi,on T�iscussion and Action (continued)
o Motion for ap�roval (Goldbach)
�� � o Sea�rlded (Nicoli)
� Approved unanimously
� 5.7 SUBDIVISION YRELIMINkRY PLAT .AND VAI�IANCE S 1--76 (En,glewood III)
` . A request for prelimina.ry pl.at approv�.l and a variance of �
the subdivision code provisions xequirzng �idewalks on, both �
sides of the street fo� Englewood III, a proposed third !
�hase subd.ivision and develop.ment �f the En:glewood Planned �
Developrnent, vicinity of SW 115th and Springwo:od Dr. ;
�.. Staff Heport; reaa by Powell.
B. Applicant Presentation �
�
o Ernie Platt, Vice �'resident of Commonwealth pr�aented
testim�ny in support af the prelimi�.ary plat pro-
posal and stated he would be willing to participate �
in an I,�D far d�velopment of 115th, but wo�.la no +
assume the costs for full street im�rovements with-
out �ar�ti.cipation from the ot�,e� property owners.
t
o Dick Waker, en�gineer, gave testimony relata.�,g to th�
extension of i15th and explained the exclusion of
the park and school site westerly of 115th from the '
� plat. ,
�
��TT
� ' �^
`` page 8 ;�
PC Minutes
March 2, 1976
�
C. Pub]_ic Testimony: nane
D. Sta�� Reaornmen.dat:ion: APPROVAL o� the pxeliminary
plat on the condition that the developer assure
the developmEnt of 115th to No. Dakota as required
1ay the City's 1972 Planned Development approval for
En.glewood. Further, recommen.din.� APPROVAL 5f the
variance for �idewal_ks.
E. Re�uttal
o Mr. Waker, representing the applicant, suggested
that an alternat.ive would be to "�ureshort�n"
115th and provide for the developmen�t of that
portion, �f 115-th and the portion of 115th south
of the site in an LID.
F. Commission Discussio,n and Ac�tion
o Sakata asked staff abo�zt sidew�.l;k varian.c� proposal,
c� Stai'f expla.ined the proposal m�re cnmpletely.
o Moore stated that Commonweal�th should be involved
�' in the devel�pment of 115th, but that he �e1t
��- they should not bear. th� entire cast of the improv�-
men.t.
o Mation for approv�al (Ems) as requested, but "�ore�
shortening" 115th to allow the portion excluded from
the plat, as we11 as th�t portion o� 115th �outh of
the �lat, to be develnped under an LIL7.
o Seconded (Nicoli) .
o i�'lotion carried unanimouslyr
6. PRELTMTNARY PLAN DEV�EL' QPMENT RE'VIEW �
,
6.1 PFtELIMIl�T.AR�Y REVIEW ZC 1-76 (Carpent�r) �
�
Staff. point�d out that there was an error in the agenda and �
that thi� was not to be a preliminary review as is stated �
in -�1�e agenda, but was to be a request by Gorr�on Carpenter �
for a zone map amendment on a s,ite in the vicini-�y o� 11535 �
SW 98th Avenue from R-7' to .A-2 for an a artment development j
(Wa�h; Go. tax map 1S1 35C, t�� lnt 90a�. �
A. Staff Reportt read by Powell ,
!
� 13. Applicant Presentation i
o Gordnn Carpenter, applicant, described his project. I
1
1
I
j
�
'1
;
' ,.
r,�'; r..,-.,
�. �,
page 9
PC Minutes
� March 2_, 197h
o Goldbach asked about thP n�arness of the pr. oject I
to the rail line right-of-way. i
o Sakata asked about the buildin.g pattern and i� a Ii
plan.ned development wauld not be in order.
C. Pu.blic Testimony: none
D. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL on the candition that
10 ft. of right-of-way '�e dedicated on SW 98th Ave.
E. Rebuttal: none
F. Commission Discussion and Action
o Motzon for approval (Golclbach) subject to staff
condition based :on find:�ngs that the proposal
satisfies Comprehensisre Plan conditi�ns; t:hat it
will nat adversely impact the community; that it
wil1. provicle for commur�.ity n.eeds and that it ���its
in�� with the area.
� o Motion seconded (N1oor�)
o Motion approved, Sakata nay.
6.2 PRELIMINARY REVIEW ZC ?_-76 (KjElg�ard)
A request by Orlan.d Kjelgaard for concept approval of a
proposec�. residential planned d�velap�nent in the vicinit,,
of 13778-13840 SW Hall Blvd. (Wash. Co, tax map 2S1 2DD,
tax lot 500) .
A. Staff Report: read by Powel�. with a recommendation that
the matter be tablecl for one mon uh, as sta�ted in the
staff report, for further work by thP NPO.
B. Applicant Presentation
Mr. Stucky, speaking an 1aehalf of the applicant,
stated if a 60 ft. right-of-way were provided, the
resul.t would be a more pedestrian uriented planned
developmen�:. He also addresseci the staff findings
with respect to informational defieieneies and said
tha�t those would b� addressed in the presentatiori
tio the Pldn-riiizg Commission for approval,
C. Public Testimony
�
`
� _ : _. _ _ . . _.. _ .. .. .,..._... .�. . ___ .:_.._ .. ._ . .:�_ .... �:...._
' �
��;.. page 10 ���".
� PC Minutes �`"
March 2, 1976 'i
�. �I
�� John Avery, Chairman of NPO #5, addressed the •• I
Comm.ission �.nd asked for deferral un.til the question I
of acc�ss roads could be resolved by the NPO.
D. Staff Recommendation: given in the staff report. �!
I
E. Rebuttal: none I'I
F. Commission Discussion and Action
o Nicoli asked staff a�out the ex�,aense of retention
system on site.
o Staff responded that there was no intent �o require
a retention system, but t:hat it should be considered
by the applicant and possibly be r.equired, if appro-
priatee
o Motion to postpone for one month until NPO #5 has
had time to discuss the rnad system proposed far
this �rea (Ni.coli) ,
o Secorlded (Goldbach) .
o A.pproved unanimou�ly.
�` 7. OTHER BUSINESS: nan.e
I 8. ADJOURNMENT: 11:50 p.m.
I
i
�i
�
�;
1 -
��.
Staif Report
Tiga•r�3 Planning Commission
March Z, 1976
CU 10-76
Agenda Item 5.1
Conditional Use Permit
A request by Michae7. Scherr for permission to operate a billiard
parlor and eguipment sales establishcz�ent at 12760 S.W. Pacific Highway.
Staff Findings
l. The site of this proposal is the former plaid pantry convenience
grocery at the Village Square "Shoppzng Center" on S.W. Pacific Hwy.
?.. Land u�e nor. thea.st of the site wit�hirl the shopping center is a
fast foods restaurant, and professional offices adjacent. Most
of the "shopping center" is offices with a £�ea market for an
anchor tenar_t. The adjacent land use southwest of the site is
a restaurant (Davidsons' Frostop)
, 3. R�quired paricing under the p.resent code for Villa�e Square is
:�8 parking spaces plus 1 for each two empi_oyees and 1 f�r each
f�r e:ach establishment. The nuznber of spaces provided is 59,
according to the submitted site p1an. Staffs observati.on of the
site indicated that there were fewer spaces available than that,
due to a reorientatian of the parking in the center of the pa.rking
lot. Staff. also noticed that about 15 of the parking spaces
ava.ilable are illega2 because they overlap into the public
right-of-way of S.W. McKenzie St•reet� Gonfirmation of the lack
of ad�equate perking maybe seen in the fact that the adjacen�
parking lats of "Southwest Professional Cenker" are p��ted to
� prohibit "unauthorized" parking. Furthermo.re, during the hours
of operatzon of the Flea Mar.ket, there is little or no parking
available for any other use. This does not pose a problem for the
pxafessional offices but w�uld be a problem for the billiard �arlor.
�+. The planning commission has previously considerec3 a conditional
' txse permit app7.ication for the Flea Market adjacent thi:s proposed
establishment--at that time n� particulax c�nditions were placed
on the property owner with respect to brin�ing the parking lot or
ache
s into conf
ormance with Cit code.
s
treet a ro Y
PP
�. There a•re tz� curbs or sidEwa;i'�.s on S.W. rScKe�:zie �treet, in spite
0
f the fact that McKenzie Street is t'he o�.l.y access available to
the apartments behind the village square propertya
6. The "sidewalk" on Pacific Hi.ghway is simply a cox�tinuati�n of `
„� the parki,ng lot, without a bumger strip betw�en the, parking
spaces and the: „sidewalk'".
.. .. . . � . . . � � , . � .� �.1
� � \.. . ��i4...�.: . . . � ., �
�
page 2
Staff Report - CLl 10-7b
�,.
March 2, 197'6
';'I
7. There is litt'le concession given to si.te imgrovement or - �
land'scaping on the site.
8. Part of the "parking 1ot" shown on applicant's site plan an,d
presently in use is in the Gity street--as a result of w�.ich the
�ity is not only comznitted to maintenance, but also maybe liable '
for any damages resulting from misuse of that street.
- Staff Re�ommendations
' to be given following public testimony
�
� � � � � � ���i
��
,�
_.
i
�
1
�
(
I
`I
` ;;
. ,
>�
' �
.. _ ,
£
� _,, .�._.� . . . ,. ..:-
., .` .� .;��. .� .. �99.5��.. .. �... ,� ._ . .. . ._... � . . .._.... . ,: ..�. .�. ,.. .
:.�, .. . ,...... .., . ..... , . ...... ... , ..... . .. .._ '—.�.�-�"���.�---J`_��,_.^- � i'J� �,�'' 'i 5 �J�i.:.
� � ` • r�.! 'U' .ZS � . 7� \ .
� � � 3.,���. � .�J
P - -. i 61.1 � .�.�_ ---_""'"-- 139 � N 39°53° 6.73 CH C7 �
6 14 CH. r. �� /Q �j � /� � . Q � � � �
s ,/�,�
3�E �� U.�'i r 1 � � � r����� 1 �� � �� � 4" � �,.�
/ � � �� 1i F v �� . " ' '9n � Q �n
� � �C� r N
� •:��� �c' � t 3 ��, � �� �'�ri ,�� ' .�r � �/��°
���/ °i �i�/"''\(� � t 39 � f"���a�tiy. "�. � G� s
`V�^ 3�5�'Y".� � l�\� t, p -E C I E 5 p�U�� �� � �� ��, � � �
� ,�'���� 1�LJ�J V _�� o � at, �� � � � o
+:
L< i 3 � D � ' �✓.,, °-
�1.� �/ I I 6 5 �„P -� ����J ��'9r� � ���e' /� 4
\ �.!,a• -a . '� .�,�, ���� a�
V / CJ �t'y,"c'�S '�LJ , n i+ p ,.
�/ � 'NN�Jv � g,;, �r' �!r;. '" �
:C �
' � n o °' S39°5?;yy �?9 �,.
n�i ., �;�� 120.0 �/
M:i �'`a OO a 6.73CH. �n���"�� �,�-b o
N45° O�W 6.Z2CN, 1373 �� tQ 4�•' N39°53�E t� •
3.17GH � 16. i.76CH. ,�+�1 120.0 �5,1014� ��� ',
°�� ���0 I �CS�,O r„���� �'� 0 1.6 8� �3O �Q t�.
� A `" /
] �, hJ 39 S�Ej
���^ � � 4 0� � O i,,\ ,� �o �p ..,�/ �p y� �, ��oi.z '
�...J/.� � I �'9J f�, � �'�q Q U '�,�/�/ / A m� �".��
,/� I :. '� y .� ✓�/�. 9j �+�� `�a -�`,j
151.65 ¢� F'. " 01 \n° , ''\ � i�x f `,
��/�1� ��5 �� � ,w - , \r f�.A c+ � 94�
� ��.,../ rn � �n 6� 91.4 '� F ��y /' x o �
�� i I/s/,/' A��u� '�� N,��N�1,� .p D^ (�.� ✓�� q�'k'��.-. $4. d�
l!' \./ ,s y'
. _��1 9�/ ��1 �s o����N����Z., NN � � � //�'F � • •�J
cn �' � p � �.�/ � �
: • N Is�',,2J A I� 9 ' �� \ 1
l tp I
_ N
3.17GH. 16� mI 2Uti.86 �Q 1 �•a� �� �
• '�a� I.70CN. 1.70CH. 2251 � �.:�
20i.�6 � 53 �,t, t —
i / ii /�%///ii�� �,�.� �"� .:, �/%//%'///�'%�%///%/G/�i�%%%/%f///,/".%////.,�'�'%%//%/%J/./,'////�./'i/i�/�%%/%"//./,%%ii'%%%✓�,%!i./;%//;..,;��,��>'%./�,;��..;,,.,,.�, ' d.,.i,>>!
%//%%/%�%�i,%%l.,/.%/.,/,,//////�r.,////��//,�,/%��/i,//.////////.,,/ ` � � � i
� 3 0 --
:.;
--- � �._ ------- � � ����fi -�_ _o �.,���
� 3s2.o � a
,\ � �
�-'l 11 ' g ' ,, \ � . . L 6.6� � ,�
� \�— I 15 2.0 3 0�`- � 0 I � ` ,�
/
� /9 .�p ' S
\ .�C�0 � .�.�, 9 � ��,/ �,�3
\ �v �:,,: �°�: I " C s'�p
. � ��,77
. . � � N o �I IN � . �� � T � V
. ��• m a I� ��I � �� �
� "
" � I �
� � n ./� � \
�\ . � ( t � •/� ^ �
� . y/� � � � 1,vp' �
�` T�`' � j- � �/�.�'/
� i s z.o '-,�'. - i zo _�� ^ _- �a - � / � ti ;
, � � �� ' �n �f N �
\ � 1�/ /6� 5,�, �� �
� sT O °i
�\ ' �y � �� �'�' � ��'S � �;
� w\ i"'� I '9r !S`J �
a � u / 4a
�� d � �I
o��.. /`v ' ' �,.0 � `�•
f��
'�' � �f^ to ( fi
''�`,,,, ' `'�,�� 5`'916q��c I .."'`� ON,397/E50 •� /s Y �
�y� �+�. /�/'1 ` // '-a O/ G
\ ' � i f � '`' �"91,i� u �✓ ,� O$• � �
�,.� \ o N 4b°Sa'lo°E o
u � I I �� 2 0 w� °^.'� � �
` I i I � �, �,°� � ,j' .!�,l�j� "' �
� � ./`' u �
�; o � ( I �. , �' ,,•^ �
:� `_ � ,�. N 45°56'10'E �
� \ . � - _�, � -�- _.... l .n � � �� � ' 2C16.59�
' \ � � ° �vcntea 1 -� � •' `� � �S i
� �_. DV, 5161SJg -p �-- ; �, � r?pC� i
:\' '� T ^-- _,` ��
� � - .� --- ./� . "�, l
�. � �h �Z � y --- -- .� �'1 � i
,\ � �,�J l c i �, ;
� �
� s� W t �
� .,, , :.� �
t � , � ,��, �± _
. � �:� �
� � .. �
� v \ u
�,,,... ��'' ua� o�� ✓�� \_� ;. 0
.
i 4 '� �,, �,.J/ � U
� ° • � "" k',`��' �..� _ �� ... . ml ..J �1 .�.i� . . .. . ,. .:..,�
�`.c .«..-' . ' �w . . ' _ � . ... �� :.�
<.
. . ', .. ..,���.�.��.
------_ - � "---
'-
�a .. �� �
`�.:.,
Gi�ty of Tig�rd ,
Tigard Plaaining Dept.
Tigard, Oregon
PROJECT: Conditional Use Peranit Application
Existing Vaeant Plaid Pantry Market
Converted to Family Billiard And Reereati�n Genter
The present building vras former].y a convenience market. We pronose to use
the existing 2tE00 sq. ft. for both, a retail sales orgaxzization �ngaged in the
sale of billiard equipment and tables and a family billiard and recreataon
center.
�.'tle locatian, access, exposure, paz�king and nearby businesses ar�d multiple
rlw�lling units are a]_1 rea3ons for .requ�sting the conditional u�e permi�.
7'his conditional use of a C�3 zone sl;iould l�ave no conflict wi�h the �it�
c�f Tiga.rd adopted Comprehensive pla�.
�he total recreatianal facilitiea located withix� the Cii:y of Tigard are i
e�tremely limi�ecl. �hh.e graximity o� other �'orms o�' recreation sueh as the one
we propose ar� in Beaverton �nd Partland. �iaving a funetion 5L1CI1 a� �his a-� �
�his loeation wi11. not on1.y �e convenient but will reduce auto travel and j
�
congestiprx.
� Tha in and out traffic flow of -this proposed busines� shc�uld be of' mueh I
longer duration then the previous business thus reducing the volume. The
�eak activity ��ould be in the evening �.fte� rush haur �;raf�'ic and weekends.
Availabili.ty of this type of x�ecreation would be especi��ly bene=icial
to the yoizth of �ur aom�runity as �;he ground� wi11 be striet�y supervised and, i
easily accessihle, giving them a� opportus�ity to exper�,d their ener�y in a �
healthy atmosphere and in an aceep�table manner. i
AS the immediate neighbors are businesses of the type that would. benefit . �
�'rom out traffic flow, there vri11 be no adverse affect on them4 Other
slightly removed neighbors are high dens�.ty� apartments which wou�.d benefit �
from a elose anc� convez2ient recreation center. �
i
.A.11 necess�ry utilities are existing on the site. 'I'he�e w-i11 'be n� need �
to increase or change any of these utilitie3. Triere will be onl,y a nominal �
I i�!paet if any on public tran.sportatic�n as the type �f ��,9�.Yieys we �ropose is a y
local corrmlunity center. �
� l
In conclusion a "FAMILY BILLIARD AND �CR�',A.TION CF.�VTER" w:i11 great:Ly �
coz�tribute to the recrea�tional. needs af the Tigard eomQmznity providing wholesoma, '
ea9ily accessible, weli supervised recreational needs in a gro�nring cammunit�y �
in a climate that needs indoor recreational faca.liti�s. �
i
� �
r �
STAFF REPORT
Tigar.d Planning Commission �
�* March 2, 1976 I
s
�
CU 4-74 �
�lgenda Itern 5.2 �
�
CONDtTIONAL U5� PERMIT (Renewal) i
A request by Roger Grahn for reinstatement of a previausly
granted permission to construct a duplex in an R-7 single
famil.y zone approximai:ely 500 feet southeast of Ash Avenue.
(Washington C�unty tax map 2S1 2DF3, tax lot 2300) .
Staff Findin�s
1. In June 1972, the Planning Commission approved the Burnham P3rk
Subdivision Preliminary Plat with the conditian that two lots,
of minimum site size be made larger, and that iwo other lotsy
there by znade substandard, be combined into one "duplex" lot.
2. At that time the Tigard Community Plan--tha adopted comprehen�ive
plan for this area until adoption of the NPO ��]. plan--designated
the area as 'Urban Medium Densi.ty Residential, buk the zoning
was R�-7, single family residential. The NPO �kl plan redesignates
this si.te for Urban Low Density Residential.
� 3. Land use in the area is residential�-single family homes tn the ;
' west, and south. The vacant land to ttie north is designated '
duplex, but staff understands that there is a prnposal £or �'
apartments to he built there. South of the site is a large �
(several acre) residential 5ite which may be assumed to be �
�:`
subject to subdivision for home �ites.
4. The original (1974) approval of this condition.al use permit
for a dupl.ex provided that:
� � ,;
� �'�
a. access and egress to the subject site be only to and
from S.W. Burnham Court, and ;
b. the duplex development be subject to Site �evelopment ;.1
Plan and (A�chitectural Design Review. . . sl
5. That conditional use permit become void in March- 1975, but the r'
applicant claims to have been unaware th�t he was stzbject to a �
conditional use permit or that there was a time limit on the
permit. (Mr. Grahn purchased the lot in 1974 from Mr. Pruitt, ;:
the original applican�. ) j7'
�:
6. Mr. Grahn also wants .;the provisions requirin� access to and from
Burnham Ct. rescinded sa that he may put his driveway onto
�..;.
S.W. Hill St.
�5
�, . . - .. . . . � � . � .. . � � � . . .. �� � � � . ,r
S�taff Recommen,dations �� (�,';
t �.
t� be given after public testimony
�;
`"
r:,
��
#'�
�.,.. . _ _
, raa
_ .: _ _ , _ _ .. : -, i,
t
, {7.. ' I li
� � tt
.... . .. 1�:1
�(
�.
�i
� Roger P. Grahn �
�
Construction / Develapment �
9655 S.W. Cypr�ess Beavertn�, Oregon `�
646-6233 97��5 �
f
Feb., 9,1976
T3.g�rd Planning Comm3.ssion �
1�420 S.W. Main
Tig�rd, Ore�ore ;
Attn: Dick Bol�n Ne: Lot 1'�, Burr�ham Par-k
;'.
` Dear Sirs
In 1974 I purch�sed the bulk of the 1°Hurnham Park'� �„
plat from Mr. Pruitt, the dev�].opex. Thi� purcha�e ,, ,�;
;,
zncluded lot 17, suppo�edly a duplex �one�. 1ot. T� ;;
,. ,,
support the claim of duplex zox�ing T was given a letter }�
��: ��
regarding zon�.ng f"rom Mr. �rooks of th� city of Tigard '
{7�
� 1�
to Mr. Pr�.itt. Thi,s letter stated flatly th.at the land
,
ut�e was duplex. No men�ion was made of a time 1ir�it
nor of �� c onc�itional. use rul��g. ��
�.
� • � � � � �-.
� npw �3nd to my diemay that it was' in f�ct a condi- ''
r�
};
tioa�+l t�se permit which has expired. Accord3.ngly, T {j
he�ewith request a new h�aring to reinstate the duplex i�
land use for lat 17, Burnham Park, as sooM a� poss3.b1�. �
��
>�
Sincerl � '�
, �
/ i PY
Rages P. Grahn �
�
�
�
#i
� _
�
�
, E:
�'
� t�,.'"�.. �
�_, ,
��„„
�r�
I�,arcy�7, 1`-'174
Mr, Arthur J. Fr�sitt '
G339 S,17. Pe�ton Road
I'ortl,�nd, Ore�on 97219
Dear A�r. P�uitt:
�'he Ti�ard Planni.n� Cor�nission, �st a t�laxch 5' 1.974 p�ULic h�aring, took acki�
to �p�ruve yai�r request to �llow a duplex d.welling uni.t ix� an R-7� Sitngle T,�:.mi:1y
F�:sictc.ntia�. zane; ttie subject propexty descriLecl as aeing 'tax I,a� 23Q0 oax
47ashiXigt�on Gounty �Tax riap 2S1 2D3. 5aid Planx�ing Coruriis�iau action is sub,ject ta the
s��tisfacti�r.a o.f iche following conditians by the �pgLicant or .ubsequent property
".�`' o�:yn��rs.
. . .'tec;�:ss & e�reQS to the subject la� bc an.Iy to arzd from SW �
Ect�nh�m Cauxt
. Th� duple�c ciev�lop�nent be sut�jeet ta Site Development k�l�sn and
Design R�view Uy the 'figarci S�te Develo�meYZt 1'Ien and Design Review �
Bo�rd, ,
I.f you shou�:d wish clarification af the, aba*,re �3escribed actir�x� �lease call ou�
a�£ices at 639w4171,.
aincezely�
11�i15�0iy E• t3TOOlC$
Plr�nning bir�cto�c �
WCII:Iw
;� i
I
�I
. i
j
,.. ..w. ,._ .,:.. �_ -�--:;
..�...v. , . .,,., ..:�
�-M..�,,...,. .
_ . _
. ,. � .�_
�:�.:t ,�..:... . ..:.. ltlC!- 11�`i:'Ci ll "i�:_T i.:�::,�.o�a�,._r..t._.,.,_...,y... .��,. . ,,..:.. ,._.. .... � :.....
..._ ......,.
, ' � . prcposed o�onex'Sl�ip of the pxoperty during pliasES and� tlie riroicc}'ion �vui�.rurrs
!]�rt•ugh a h��r,c.r °" •rs ass��..i�ztian for c�,^c�rcn a�cas and impro��e�nents, on
tho�e ba=cs w° �,..,r�sess c�ur �pprc;va�e" FraLisr �i�- :^!�e� t.he motion and it
������iy u:,ani.rrlt�s vctP, .
.... ,,.
'T5. FUL'L�IC !iE.4RING = Ccndi ti cn�? Clse
601 Ccnditicr.al Uve CU 4=�4 (p�'��-��t.)
A TC.C]Lf:St by Ar.th�.�r J, Prl,it.t to a??��+�' � ���F��� d��el.l.ino as a condition3l i:se
ir_ � R=7, Sing?e Fam:ly R�sid-.;,c�a� z�ree T:�e site is 1a��tiFa Gri tlie souti�wYly
side of S�1d� Hill St�.et, ��?prao-:�m_,tc-.'_y 550 fe��t sGUCY:east �f 9sh Avenue snd ct:rr,Frizes
� . z�:x: n:�t_' �GGO �qLa�? f�=�t� tT.��±c �;�p 2S� '�:� ', T.x Lot 23�O�e
C1� ,� �Y
Aw Staff I'indings -
�
1� Rrccks p:e�c:nt�;d ;.'�e st3ff fi.�dings releva:�t to thi� c�se.
B� Test.imr_,r,y & Ctc�sS rxacr:;;Zticn
1, Fro��:r_ents
�, Ac+.� ►��t�it.�, the �PP�i:.a�t., E:�:p!ain�d his pre��nsa2 ca t:�s F?�::,�ia�g
G��ir_nissic� =ta±ing ih�.S, whEn he s��hdivfder.� the Burr.?��m P3xk Si�bdivisic�n
w'r!i�it in��Ii!des t�e ,�ubject parcel9 th�t the Planning Commission
,..
r�quested hfs cc�;cbir�in� twc sing?� faniiLy lots to fosm c:�e d�pl�x Lct.
`(`r�_e t�a� cc�.��bined lc�� :3TL t?ie >>�b'e�:t af his re u.st at this �i:r��
�. � �
._ IUY'
�'�'t�7Yr?: �3Fil1YGV8Z�
zp opgosician
a� Na an,: ,�pE.::zred in c�ppo?i *_ic•r. ;o Yi�� ?-e�uest,
i�
Go Siaff Recocrrnez�da4i�n
� 1� St,�ff rc:c�.;rs-:�ndc3 agprcval af tr,a �„�;p? �•L,a*tt�s r.�qYsest for ccrf�it�nn?1
u;n ���.�_c,v�l to ,1�;:•w th� ..�n�t.uLt.ioTz c�f a dv.�,le�c dwelling in :.r� Ro1�
Six��3e rimi?y P,=s���r�ti�l rcn.ep
�10 �orr;mi��siot� Di�:�;�c.>irn ar.d P�tfcn
Za E3�� :r;vcd to appF�c.vE th� r�.;��.E�st cn ti�¢ ba5is �£ th� applicant°s subr:�issicn
� a�?d ?h� s�aff fir.rii,�gs rtith tw�� �:�_,r:dit.icn,s�
° 7h3t 5�:'ESS �� prcvi3e�:j 4i�iQ c��Jo �.�?'ASi:'�[[I Cl�L2Z"t �?�l�yo
` T?�at t�,e d����elr,pme�-�t b� �,ttbjec.t f� �it� and architectur�l dMsign rcvic�wo
2, Frazier. �r?CC:l�,�<� it:e rr.,�tifz and � t �ass��d t�y un.�rA_;�,ovs •acte ef r.hE Ccrrniissi�n
7� 1E;f'! IC I:�rRZ?�G � �'ar.iarce
`� ?,1 V.3ri.a*;ce - V 7�i3 (Circic A�=W Pr�d�c�s Ccrnk��ny)
,'� z•�n.��st by Circ2� �=11 Prc�dt.:cts Ca*rin�ny to ca►�str,uck dn: a�ldition to thFir
�:xisti��g L��:i?.dir,g, �aid �d�3itic•n prapc:ed to h�ve � I2 faot rFar y�rd se!.back
tai�ere a 20 fcat s��th�,c:k is req�ire�. ?he prc�prrty is aaa_d M=2, Ger:er�l
?nd�.straal and �s locat.�� at 13885 S.W. 72�d Aver,.�eo (T�x t�i�p 2�1 1�C, Tax i.ot 1100)
..,. . 4 . .,..T.4t �—.�..1�• _.... _.... ...• a.7..�_ . � ' a. • . � .
�., . . . . . . . . ,. . . .. .., . . .... ... ..,,.�. . . . .. �. . . .
... . .�'• � u,.. ..,..
, _ ,
� • �.R
�� �.
� `
CQNDITIONAL USE
Duplex
� 20U
. .�j• " ♦ 1w�c
�7, .d 220 4� `' 8
/+ (�
+��� IE �.
� 701
• .�
1
Orr,���y. ,� ' v; 2t1 • �ra t
� �9 ��t
IS b/ t�'' � •. d,
r���,2�3 • � 1y � A,N222 �{� 7��r7s
°�.• .
, iy • ,�.
ro �
� + •,
'� • +r a..zae., '•' :� ' ��'
• �� " � � 7
z i;.,r�r� ,.� � , • �. •
,'�,�`227 0 /� �OOD
17 b�`e , � �
, / e
�/`� d I!1 i`Y Q�� N'� •'. i 4. � .
• 9 +
i�_�Ih•1 1 +�� •� '� ... O
� Cr� 9� • +, � �
�4t I� � �{ � J • � /�
s, �, , y. �. . .�, . ., 3 '* ,�uoo *�. ,s, � l_.
. .. �
� �9 .I ! f
�'•+22S�� �I VY y'� ;�2�. 'r '�! !-�T����J ,���. ,'Q•
�f• ` ei� � `,
�� � �' �T�n`y� r••/ s�.,. .W. °�n O"�s` � . .e`o�
� Kr '•rr1 �� V + � •
Q� , � .*� � ,`• ♦� �`� .�/ 1600 S�,
'a.... ��0 923 '� i� H��'e�J,,'' � . p �y �
� Z� 27 + / 6 ��au. >'`°��500r��''i' . .tt ��
•
.r ,� , {, 4 �
• ��' '� � 92� � � 1300IIad0:t 9 • ,I .
;` `� Z+ � 7 .�t � � 'j,P`, . yf700 �
� + ���.e� `� �s. e �', � °� �-, J� f� o�= 1� .L.
�; '�'90i �i �1 p • . 925 ♦ ��,. � � r" 19(�� �ti„1' �\
• � ♦ � �� P � � �� 'IGM� ._N� .::::..� 40d .
/� 'a o°. e• �� � ,J •a�'; i� •M � � ��r�c
902 ��•a. `° � - _.�, .� e� m .� !9C0 ��. ( �. ��.. � � � .
z , ,.,• ' zF � ia "'c��(�Q'' � .
� � 1 -�' 3�i �
�� .• Z 4.�� r~ ��v��►c 0*�d. . • .�� .
� 'oi•� �•�1- 9� �r�� ,► w+'�^��° � �'.+� '4� at �' �L '::R a . 241� . .
+ v{ 2p 9Q1 Zppp � s 72(1Q ' �... � • �\ ��
3 � ,' r ✓ .' � a 2� '• ` t 1� .f2U0:yx 16 �6� ��.A�����
e � .s • ,i 9 7 a � i. e �
�� `� ,921 ��;�. 919 ..a � � K..' •9 � ~} *.�31, 07'�� .�i
�
•��2 : n�, �9 �G� .s 20 '; � � • \
<< �'�l. �� � •' ,,, ` ,.w' 4 2e � f �
� •��i J� � •�r� `�am 1,�
� ' �•� �:'il �
•,'w`, �° �e � 929 . ,
°� �° 911 �Q � ' ��•a i . �
s ,��au s
S �/'T9i6 17 .+e � �, . � �� �.g
'3 't y f 5 ^^" l�_i v- .ti6 93D ,s \ ,
. n _,1 ,� 6 ��• ���' �.
:. , N� �, �,`,,,, .'
:��/1 �: � r � . .
�Li+��i' .�'�y V.�� . 9J2 \y� . .b a �S w Gi 10lG9Y �
\ z � �
PGE � 9as o':> � $� `� 4
� •' 33 4 ' � ;,�+9� ° '�
i e•�-i 936 :a: .,...\.�� �0 � J! � . . .
�939 0 :� 38 G +1kv'4��4y3� °�� '�•, � �
g �� ��e
+� �i i�l 34 ' �`
1 �� ,• r .
,�,,.�� 93) ..M i._�-'
�' •
�t „�, � "7�
' �
._ ._ , ._. �
� � � � � � �
Staft Report
_�,, Tigard i'lanning Coaunission
March 2, 1976
V 1-76
Agenda Item 5.3
VARIANCE
A request by Benol, Inc. for a variance of the front yard setback
requirements in a C-3 zone (general r,ommercial) section 18„28.040
of the Tigard Municipal Code, for addit;i.ons to tk�e Safeway store
(Tigard Shopping Plaza) at 250 Tigard Plaza (Washington County
tax map 1S1 35DD, tax lot 2100)
STAFF FINDINGS
l. Existing Safeway store is built on the property line along
Ha.l1 Boulevard and proposed addition would extend the building
an additional 56 feet from the present 128 feet to a length of
18�+ feet along Hal1.
2. The 10' froni: yard setback in, the C-3 zone, plus the 40' center-
line setback for Hal.1 B1vd. would make the �ninimum legal �etback
from the prc,perty line here 20' .
3. Parking ratio proposed is L.7/100� square feet gt.oss lease area
';�• for the whale project, assuming full occupancy (a portion of
the shopping center, a�out 20,(�00 square feet, ha� �.ever been
completed or occu�ied).
4. According to typical standards, Tigaxd Plaza Yias about the
minimum parking space that it can standy although it r<<�s
f�r more than Tigard's minimum staxi�iard� require. It is s�aff°s I
opinion that Benol could safely r.educe its number of parking �
` spaces by 10 to 15 percent without creating a parking p:rablem. I
Also, the pa•rking areas, as presently designed are wasteful �
of space and could be redesigned to aceomodate as many or mcre �
automobiles as well as landscaping. �
5. Minimum landscaping requirements are; 10° �andsca�e setback °
from fr.c�nt property 1ine, major landscape featizre (shade tree) �i
70 feet on center (both ways) in parking lo�, 2' landscape �
buffer and sight obscuring fence or hedge between parking and ;
adjacent residential areas, and, a minimum of 15% of tdtal : �;
lot area must be landscaped. �
6. Applicants statement of hardsh�.�p. is included with this staff report. (I
-7, ,C','�has r.ou,rc fta c�7r�,� �n t��,�>�'a�, v�'�r'�'�"l!�cr�t„�,Da�'K�Co, �t�M��t �C"',aua�td':Xkc.aar..r��i-��cwa��pu��.���;��, t��
STAFF RECOMMENDATION ��
to be provided �ollowit�,g public testimony ��
w
�
� �l
` !i
�
�
� . .. . . . . .. . . , . . . :KI
J?
��
f
#n
�,�__.�...�,,..�� _ _ __ _ _ _
_ _ ,_. , . .
_ _ _ _.
.__ .. . . R. ...� r ... .._-�.-.,, _.,._::�..< . . . .
. . � , . i v .. .��� O .. � � �J
r `oo �`�� o� � .� i� °� �- 1�,;,
�(1 � �a�• LJ � �(, � � � _ °"/'. �
�� � � � o L.c O o � ' �j C' \ � r r
' �e . �r n Q \r / 1 � ' ..�t✓ � � . . . - .
I � / - `� �O/ \,.� .r � 1� O � � t � L . . . .
. . �t ` .,-,�� �J � tiQ. � �� A .
Y ' . ` � ` `• J`N a9. �� / / 2 \. .` . .
c�=_ ` ' � go o \\ /� \ o ,� `y'C � �� a '..\ .�
. � \ O �� � �� /' \r � \ r ^ . . . .
�j O a � �/ 1/�- ��- ��'�4�1\ � `
�. � �
0� O \,Li � � �� a � ?� �' �J'� ` �
� �s �e� o � �+ • -�1��N �� �� � zsa., �::_ ,/�///%/�
\� �y� �5 �C Q m\f+. (7 � � -,� 5�....��„ `,n rir �
" \ D � . � , iii,r.� 1 ` ct
.:�u�g �� �• '% � � �/ ��. ,,.,:.,s-.,�.. ,a.,, o �S � Q
e a O ,��,.• ,� . �o \ cV
c� � � � ..8,3r.�`��.-..ivr.
- f�. 6> � , � u � �
n � � � O� \� �i �i ���/.� � �/� � �l � � .
v '� m• O °' , �, � ��' .,,..
�'' � �..� (J)
Q �;< :0 . �i � r" .. ;" ,rv:�•� �57•� <S ,n � ' N
�'� �`, � = v
.yr � 378 �Rh1ti't;,1P� `( �i � � 83.79 � �� �j 'LL
.Vl �' � �,ni':;�£T , 'f.,l � 1���° \ � � . � \ �✓', . C
G.J � _,�- ,$°�.7 '"�(� .�" �,�!�t 8�� / �c' ` y . . _
� � . � r � /,{,�J�;J/;i p,rc �I�• � S. / ` y,�°" '" .
�ri.... �� t y 9
; �.--�ti �-,.,��:, ;� a3.� � � �0 5° � o � �• '
� �
��— �,t�1.r,'��rc S�� . � \ � c-\� \/ . . .
-- �g.79 r � w
/
� o _� 3 T9 tJ � ��' 6 � � � ' (n
a / � \Q� H � �� `
� -Q- �s--s� 0/ ' � d �\ � � � ' � �
r � 8 9f �'_� 4 M � � ys j p �% � � �
� 0.) �
, �(!r � i \ ,r�� N� �s\ � \ g2 3� � � � �
�� � �� �\ ��' � � \ \ \ ;�
} � "\� ----''�,C. � �� c� �Z �(� p� �:
' 1 1 N •O % �,' V \�Q�• � lY �\O ��JO � �� \
' I � � \\ e� �'
�-r 6 �i�i� Z 07��s Q � c� \ � � a�+ � �
� -� N Fs — �' p � � a , � � �':'
N � C� e 2� \ � � /��-' 4 7
0 4' i/il// L!a /�
' �-�-, �n°z3E y ° 76�0`�„ •36 � \ . 8�.�a ��� a \ rQ� �522��%���i%!����ii/!I ��
I---� 82----���_ M J� __ \6 �' � \� � /•�s�/V'
� ,n o � ���- � e $,�a vF' ?;'.%/�1''��
cA ,y � � � �' �+��/i�rk 51't o a�,�26 Q /
� o i �D ,�1� _ s�C o 1 8,�s , �!/G��'� `°°
- � m vi '�s - z{ �� �\ �- ' 'f/��'%�'�' a � ° .
`D � �- °' s G�� �o �,. �C
� � ` �/f/////// '� C ;
� `rb SL a� 8� i / �/ \ ti � G� l . �,
tn i/�5+�/
�h y //����� � r '� `�• u� G�
�YO c�.-^ Q //!/ �'
dv W o yl� '°`�` ~I e��� //������/,/ A5 � o �, 4 0
" o f �'� _�/1�/ii%/�'// � �, " � in`�'
� � a
i- 3 � Q v �c2 �25
' � N;—� %,9 ���j„'/��//�//�///�� 29�, � � 3
�. "� U' C�Q r•.a� .
-•si,ii r�,, :. - ..,.,_ .. . .,..,ii � /j�,,k • x�'.� o�� ` °� �N o�y...' �'\�
/ - * i,/,/��/;iiii ,.. s�\ 4 i//�%���� �/ 5 � �;t✓• ��'c'a L �o � 2 o v
� L2'66v M,�toi� :LGi����� / �� �, 'r ��. � ��, \� 91,?6E
{ ��
- � � £L 5 (� �.��� �'�� ��� �� -
�.� s � ,1 _'D5` -n- �� t\,o� �%' ` � N
Z � ` ° ('�
� ,� oy �'�� 'Tr\o��� 6� �'� .9`/
�'f` 'o�.•� �3� n 4-�.Q' 2�"Lg/
� y � J. \ '� N 6� -(� .
�f] ��a '� ���`' r ��[' � NZ � £ . 0�
�. � +� � _ ��k/ J'., 6, \ `a.�A �r�,��v
._` ti c0 rn�o, V \ 1�5. �:; � e.� 6'n ` r� `
7 � o'- � q oNb ' `�':y 1 �� �`� ,C', � . �
� m� � �D �{'J t"��� . � 'h s5 Y 4 ��e '�Q 4. .�'<<?c
` �/% `n M � 'y ;,.. � i t �0 •'� e,� i1 ,� y�r
.7 'T , • r. �� � � • � • . �...�, •`� ` ' /�J. �� � 0� � <'
, d tv "�x� v U f M � � �� v!'a �W 4 �o �a\
M O � �
. . _ . . . . . ��dQa _ e:''`c�. . . . . �0'�
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
�
� . ` . , . I
�
, ' r � B1�LV�L� 11VC• 'l ���i�I
809, 837 W. Hastings St. � �,
� Vancouver, B. C. V6B 1B6
February 10, 1976
i
Planning Commission
;
CITY QF TTGARJ�
� P. 0. Box 23537 ''
12420 S. W. Ma.in Street
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Application for Variance to Zoning Code for Safeway Store
�Addition a.t our TTGARD SHOPPING PLAZA � ;
. �
Gentlemen: � �
We respectful.ly request your approval of �he above. T�e following are perti.z�ent '
facts and our reasons for this applica.tion:
;
1. Safeway Stores have been the prime tenant in our centre since it was completed �
in 1962. 1�ey find that their business has expanded to the point where they must I
increase the size of �heir store to handle their present and future rec{uixemerits.
T'ney therefore reQuested tllat we provide additional space of approximately 10,OOU
�y square feet, so we have arranged ta purchase sufficient additional property to
accormnodate their requiremen�s. The only way we can do this is to add a smal.l
addition at the front and a larger addition at the rea•r, an.d both additions are
rec{uired to be at the property line, tn line up witli their existing space which
is and has always b�en, on the pro��exty 1ine. The preserit zoning of both our pro�
pexty and the property we have purchased is C-3, which, a.f we were planning a new
project, would apparently requixe a, setback from Highway 217 (Ha.11 Boulevard) of_ ten
feet. �Vhi1e we consider this a "side yard", which would require no setback, techni-
ca11y it apparen�tly must be c�nsidered a "front yard", so we request tl�at you
gxant us a�proval to build the additions with no setback.
2. Conditi.ons of our application do not apply generally to other pro�erties i.n
th�e same vicinity.
3. We believe our v�ar�.ance rec�uest is necessary to protect our property, and is
reasonable. In fact, to involve a setback now, would create an unworkable building
for commercial purposeso
4. Authoxization of this variance will not be contrary to the purpose or intent
of the zonuig code; nc�r wi11 it cause or a11ow injury or detriment to other pxoperties
in the same zone or vicinity, because the completed addition wi11 be at the same
property line location as the existing building. Furthermore, after discussion
with the P1ann.ing Department, our vaxiance application seems reasonable and will
not be contrary or detramental to the intent or objective of an.y City plan or policy,
r� �
�
_, _ . _ .. .,�
..
, • -
� .. . . �._ � �
-2-
� Planning Corrunission February lU, 1976
5. We k�ave examined possible other alternatives but find th,a..t the variance req,uested
is the only deviation from the zaning code tha.t will meet our requirements.
Yours very txuly,
BFNOL, TNC. I
� � Cz , � . c�Lc �r�� �,
C, J. 0liver �� �i ''�
Pxesident
CJO:cab .
EnclA�ure '
cc: .7erolci M. Powell
Planning Departanent
�
� �..
,, ��
�'
C
��
- - �., _�r. V.� , �._ , ,..,��. .....w..
., r. _.u:: u� .�.��,,,._.w- .;e... ._ .��:. �.,; ._:. �:� .. .._...�.. ......�_ .,...,�. . _ ...,_.._. �.....__a�.�. . ,..�,,.._...,. .__...� ..__
� . ..�_ �... _. �..�_.. ..... ��_ .�..
,
�� �`� ��� :.
,����� VAT.,DE� DOCK CO. �"`°
f.,.
�y.- P. 0. Box 527
Valdez, P.laska
Febxuaxy 10, 1976
Mr. Jero�.d M. k'owe11, .Assoc. A.T�
Associ;a�e Plannex - Planning Depart-rnent
CrTY OF' TTGARD
P. 0. Box 23557
12420 S. W, Main Street
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Beno1, Tnc� Application �o� February 30, 197b :�'ox
Vari�nce �a 2oz�zn.�; Gc�d.e fox Tigard Shopping Plaza
Safeway Store Addi�ion
Dear Nir. Powe31:
We are th� own.ers of Tigarc� Shopping �la,za, which is under leaseback to Ben�1,
� �nco�porate3.
�
Benol haa fu1�. autho�city under fiheir leasebacic to make the al�ove application,
and we would g�ea�ly appreciate your P1a.nning ComQna.ssion approval.
Y'ours vexy truly,
VAT.DEZ �OCK CO3
,
�O�fCe.(.G�G� �c.:�<-�._,--.�
Wa7.1�,ce A�a.lcen � �'J�
WA:�ab
� `
. , , . . .
�,.�. ; _ __,. , :,.:..__� v ..
�' -= "=-- . , _ .� _ �.��
��,, �
[„"�. �;�,J,`
�,.
STAFF RE�C�RT
Tigard Planning Commission
��� March 2, 1976
'�''...
SCA 1-76 (I,ionel Co. }
A�enda Item 5�4
Mr. Dozn.reis} principal in the Linoel Co. , has
requested that this mat;ter be again postponed.
�
��
i
i
i
�
, �
i
� �
9
� _ : . _. .
v. . I,I
t.
��n.1 �.
STAFF REPORT � �'
��
Tigard Planning Cornmission i'.
Ma.rch 2, 1976 t'.
�. �,.
w �
SCR 7_-76
Agenda Item 5.5
SIGN CODE REVISIOI�T ;,
A proposal to amend the Tigard Sign Code (CYi. 16, TMC) ta establish
�ree-standing sign size standa.rds accord�ng to tra:£fic speed and
number of travel lanes and to eliminate free-standing sign size
restrictions based on lot frontage; a1so, to reduce the maximum
permissible height to 25' .
STAFF FINDTNGS
l. The criteria for advertising signs published by the American Society
of Zandscape Architects in a book titled StrEet Graphics by E�ald
and Mandelker have been considered the defini ive work ava.ilable
on the subject. The crit�ria attached are extracted from that
work directlyv
� :;
Ewald an.d Mandelker's criteria are ba.sed on the assumption. that th�
reason far a sign is to identify a location and, if agpropriate, �
to identi�y that location with the type of goods or services avail-
able tlzere. Obviously we common.ly accept a great deal of advertising
� of prodL�cts and services, as well as slogans, endorsements and o�ther '�
' ( ir�elevant in.�armation as "signin.g". E'wald and Manrl�lker's criteria �
wGU1d limit the in.formation cont�nt o� each sign to a message of
10 "mess�.�e items". (Ewald and. Man.de'lk�r c�efine a "mPSSage item"
as one sym'bol and./or one syllable of a word and/or on� graphic
shap� or plane; )
M
�
' 2. The present cade allows sign size to be cletermined as a function of �
the linear feet of street fron.tage of �the parcel. I� has been well
establishPd in numerous studies of sign.ing and. sign ef.fectiveness
that the length of the property frontage has nothi.ng whatsoever
to do wzth the n.eeds a business may have for place id�nti�'ication
and, in fact, frequently .r�sults in too many sign� that are too
small for safe readability.
3. T.he effective heigh-t of a si�.z, any sign, is similarly related to '
the viewex�'s position in relation to the sig�.. Th� �resent code �
allows signs ten fee�t �tal�er tha.n. any building such. sign could �:
p�rtain to. Ewald and Mandelker recc3mmend a maxim�um height that
is somewhat flexible �nd related to the partiaular situation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS �I
6 and 7} and re lace �I�
A. Rescind Section 16.36.040 (3) , (4) , (5) , O ( p
those sections wi�th a new section: ,,
��
�,�' (3) FR.EE-STANDING SYGNS. �I
�. ��
One singl�-faced or muZti-f�.ced free-standing sign per street �!
i�
€
��
�
�
�
, ,
�_, ,
, TM
a
page 2
PC Staff Report
3/�/7�
Item 5.5
��;P
fron�ta�e designating only �the name af the establishment or
premises to which the sign is appurtenant and/or the prin-
cipal goods, facilities or services availal�le on t�e premises
may be permitted an a street or highway ,frontage, providing
that the establ.ishment is accessible by automobile and provide�
off-street parkin� space and that any buildin� oc�upyirig the
same parcel of land is set back n.ot leas than 25 ft. frorn the
nearest curb line. All such signs shall be subjzct �to �the
foll.owing regulations:
e- tandin si s lar er than 10 s . ft, s
�all be lo-
a Fre s q
. g � g
cated at least 1�0 ft. apart.
`b. The maximum �.�.lowable hei�ht and size of a free-stan.dzn.g
sign ahall be determined from the following table:
Tr°a��i� Speed � of "lanes �:eigh•t irc�m gr�und sizE all.owabl.e
at edge ot pav�ment p�r sigx�. �ace
�0 mph 6 lanes 28 fto 1-90 sq. ft.
45 mph 6 lanes 24 ft. 100 sq. ft.
60 mph 4 1.anes 26 �t. 150 sq. ft.
�_ 45 n1p�i''. 4 la�.es 22 �t. 9(� sq. �t.
30 mph 4 lanes 18 ft. 40 sc�. �t.'
45 mph � lanes 20 ft. 50 sqa �t,:
3p mph 2 lanes 16 ft. 2'5 sq. ft.
15 mph 2 lane 12 ft. 3 sqa ft,
c. For the purpose of deterrnirizng: traffic speed, special
speed �ones including, but not necesaarily limi�ted to,
school zones� wi11 not be used, but thE usual control'led
speed or the state statutory spe�d, whichever is lower,
will be used.
tl. Na sign p�rmitted by this subseetion may be loaated
within 20 ft. of any intersection. of st�^eets.
B� Renumber 16.36.04Q (g) °to 1h.36.040 (8) arid amend to reads
16.�h.040 (�3} WALL SIGNS _
Wall signs may be perrnitted on any fac� o� any builc�ing
direc-�ly frontin� and adjacent to a public street. Such Sign.(s�
may not `exc�ed 40 perce��t of �k�:e net si�n.able �rea of tM,e 'front
of the buildin.g. The n.et signable area is -that u.n.interrupted
buil�.ing surface, all in one verta.cal glane anc� enc�.osed withzr�
�. 'a plane regular rectan�u.lar figure abave �he windowla.ne of the
;�
� . � - . " � . � � � � . -� - � . . � i:r...�. . . �� � � . � � ,
. � i:
��, pa�e 3 � �,
PC Staf� R.eport �'
3/2/76 �
�
item 5.5 ;i
;'
first (street) floor and be.low the sill line of the second �
floor windows or the top of the parapet w�.11, or the eavelin.e, �
or fourte�n feet in height fr�om ground le-vel at the edge nf !'
the pavement, whicY�.e�ver is less. N�o such sign. may display a.
in excess of ten (10) items of in.formation., but, in the event
of multiple tenan-L-s o�cupying;:_,establishment in one building
or ro 'ect each shall be permitted one wall sign. on any ;
P J �
street frontage, so long as the total area of such signs
nat exceed the total si are�. ermissible for that
does � P
building on that frontage. Tn th� event that a buildirig has
�
multiple street frontages, each ten.ant, or a tenant may sign ;
also the additional street elevation of the 'building, but the
maximum sign area permitted on that elevation shall be one
half the rnaxi.mum sign area permitted on the Front and no
individ.ual sign. may exceed one half the size o.£ that estab-
lishment'S individual sign (if any) on the buildiizg �'ront.
G. 1�enumber 16.36aU40 (8) to 16.36.C��+O (�) (d) and renumbEr
16v36.040 (11 to 16.36.040 9)
+� 12 " " 10
�
n �,3 n n 11
�
n 1[a. n r� �2 �
�► (15 i� n (13 ,
�� (16 �� �� (14�
i
�,.r �F ��7 �� �� (15
D. Add 16.36.040 (4) SHOPPING CENTERS .AND COMMERCIAL PLAZAS
Sh.oppin Centers and Commercial Plazas, where more than
five (5� separate establishments share a site af larger than
1 �cre and have a 1'r�oiltage �f nc� l�ss th�n 20� ft, on a major
arteri�l may be pPrmitted an oversized si�n. providing that
no two such si�n.s may be located within five hundred (500)
f�e1; of each other; no such sign may exceed 50Q sq. ft. per
sign face; aricl no such sign may exceed 35 ft. in height.
The clisplay of information on such sign shall not exceed 5
items, an.d an.y sign permitted under this subsection shall be
subject to design app•roval by the Design. Review Board.
E. l�dd 16.36.04� (5) WIiVDOW DISPLAY
No more than 25% of the windows facing an.y street may be used
fox sign purposes o� a permanent nature, eitlzer Y�y directly
applied lettering or graphics or by permanen.t signs mounted
withi.n one foot of said windows and designed to be viewed
from the street.
r. Add 16.36.040(6) AWNING, CANOPY �.ND MARQUEE SIGNS
� Awnin�s, canopys and inarquees may be used in any commercial
zone, providing, however, that a ver^tical clear�ance o�
_ ,. .�
�_ . _ _ .
�---_.� _===—,°- —=—
. . . _.i �iz�.. ...�:. -.
t
page 4 �'�'`
PC Staf� Rep�rt
3/2/7�
� item 5.5
�;.
�ight (8) �t. be allowed above any sidewalk and fourteen.
(14) ft, abavE any driveway an�d further providing that no such
awning, canopy or marquee may extPnd within, onP foot of the
curb face of a public street. No sign may extend beyond the
edges of the facia af such awning, marquee or canopy; and no
sign may be mounted an the top o�, or suspen:ded un.dern,eath,
such awning, marquee or canopy.
�. Rescina: 15.36.040(�0) �na. aaa i6.36.040(7) zNCZDENT.A.L SzGNs
Signs advertising in:cidental services of�ered on the premises,
including, but not limited to b�and�.ames, credit cards an.d
trading stamps, may no-t be display�d as, or affixed to, any '
sign permi-tted by this section, but may be only displayed as
, part of a winc��w display. '
;
� �
;
i
i
I
;
� {
i
�
�
� j
,
►
�
r �
,
h . . � . � � . � � � � ��. �
. . . . . .. . . . � . . �� . . . .
4
.. . . . . . . . . . .....1
I,:. . ' � � � . . . .. . .. . . .. ... ..: I
. � . � � . � � � . � . . � � � . -:�.�.i
� . � � .. � � . . . . . � .. .. :��.�
.. . . .. . . . . . . . � � ...� �
� . . . .. . . . . � . . . . � . . . .. � . . . � ....�.� �i
� � . .. . � . . � . � . � ... � :�. I
M ' .. . � �. . . . .. ' . . . . ' . . . . ' . .. . �,..�. :...:��
. . . � . . � .. . . ..� . . � � . . . .. �
�� �. � � . , .. . .. � .. .. .
. . . . . . . ... . . . � . .. ... . ._.
� . . . . . .. . . .
� � . . . . � � � - . ... .';..--
. � .. . . . ��. � :.
. . � . . .; �� . ..�. �
. . . .... , i�
. . . ._ .� ,� ... �, . . .
... ...... :... ._ . . � r v. . .: ..
� .._ . .... . . . . .. . , � .., �:. . ..': ..�.:. .. _"__"-.
_
� �
, ^� I
�� ti
� �y.
STAFF R�PORT
Tigard Planning Commission
, 1976
�. _��,
zoA i-76
Agen.d� Item 5.�
Zonin� Ordinance Amendmerlt ,
A �roposed amend.rrient to the Tigard zon.in.g ordinance of 1970
as codified iri Sections 18.60.010 (a) , 18.60.J20 and 18.60.160
S�La�f Findin�s
1. It has come to sta:ff's attention repeatedly that most
design standards and man� zon9_ng codes, particularly the
more recent ones, descri�e a parking stall as nineteen
feet in 1en.g-tho Tigard's zoning code requir�s a -t�nr�n�t;y
foot �arking stal.l. As little as this difference is, it
�requently requires that an a�ditional and usua7_ly un-
necess�ry two feet be al�ocai,ed to parking lot wi.dth.
In a 100 �oot long parking lot acc�mmoda-ting �0 cai^s,
this means an �xtra 200 square ��et of pavem�nt.
?_. The Zoning Ordinance of i97o, as adopted, included a
'�figure �#1" in section 190 (Section 18.1h.160 TMC) ;
however, no r�cord of that �'figure �1�� presently ex�_sts
� in -the Ci_ty fi�_es. 'I'].Ze purpose of tha� "figure �l" was
apparently to have be�n a gr�phic illu�tration of ��sufficient
width for parking and man.euvering��, whatever those wid�Lhs
may have been.
�. There is no men-tion in the code of al-t�r�ative parking
space co-rifigurations or aisle widths. One way aisles are
' apparen+lv required in oux° present code to be as wide
as -L�vo way aisles. Possible ne�ds �"or angl�c� parking
are not addressed, n.or are the dimensioris of a parallel
p�rka_ng stall!
4, The minimum space re�ui.remen.ts presently in th� code are
frequently inequitable in that they ratl�er arbitrari�y seem
to requi�e more space th�.n is aci;ually required in same
cases, yet in othe�s provides for clearly insuffici�nt
parking. For instance, Ti�ard code presently requires
less than 1/5 the number of parking spaces for a restaurant
as we i'inci the rPstaurant owners demandin�! But, on th�
other hand, a skating rink �s required. by code to provid�
3 �im�s as much parking as any rink surveyed uses. Few
adjustments of the parking required by cor.le were that
extreme, however.
. Further adjustments were suggested in the space re�uire-
m�nts to eliminate the "space per employee" st�ndard as
� much as was possible. Experience here, and in most of
our neighb�ring jurisdictions has been that a parkin�
» " � �
page 2
PC Staf� ueport
. 2/17/76 �
��. �
;
. �
space requi�.^ement based on the riumber of employees is �
bo�th impossi�le to estiinatP 'before -t�ie establishment is �
in operation and impossible to enforce aft�rwards. �
r
St�ff Recommendation � �
- �
Staff recommen.ds that the following amendments to the Ta.gard k
Zon�_ng Ordinance (Clza:pter 18, Tiga.rd Municipal Coae) Ue
appr.oved and recommended to �the City Council. �
�
18.60.010 ]�efinitions. (a) : as now reads: "Except �.s other- ¢;
wise defined in this code, 'ane h
space' means a m?nimum area available for parking nine feet wide and �
twenty f.eet 1ong. No area shall be con.sidered as a parking space �
unl�ss the plans submitted sha:11 show th�t the area is accessible ,�
and usable zar that purpose. " � ';
��
shall be amended to read: ''
"18.6U.010 Definitions (a) E�;.cept as atherwise de�ined in ;
th9_s code, 'on.e space ' means a ;
m.iniinLUn area availa'ble for �arking n.ine i'eet wide and nineteen �eet �;
� long. No area may be considered as a parking spac� unl�ss accessible
arid usable �or that purpose. "
i
18,6�.120 Minimur� space requirements: �.s now r�ads: "Off- ;
s-treet �aarking sYa.a11
be prov?dEd accordin� to the following stan.dards and regardless of
the zone in. which, the u.�e is located.
� � �
(1) RESIDENTT_1�,I., USFS: �:
�
(A) Single family resicl�nces, orie space for �ach dwelling ;y
w.zi t; f�
� � ;
(B) `1'v+�� family dwe_l_1in.gs, one space f�r each dwelling un.it; 4�
�;
(C) Apartment dwelling, thr�e spaces for each �wo d�Nelling �
units; i:
�.
(D) Residential hotel, roomin� �r boarding house, �ne spac� i
far e�ch guest �:ccornmoclation; �
1
(�) Fraterni�;y o.r soror?ty hauses, one s�ace far each t�,vo ` �
� occupants; f
(F) I-�otel, one space f�r �ach gues� room, plus one space j
for ea�h tw� employeea; '
� 1
;
� ;
..... , _ .
�. Page 3 p
PC Sta�f Repc�� �
�/17/l6
�.. .
(G) Motel or touris-l; court, one Space �or �ach guest
room or suite, �lus one sPac� for e�ch t�NO employees,
(H) C1ub, clubs sha11 be 'treated as combir.ia.+ions o� uses
such as hotel, restaurant, audi�orium, etc, and the
requireci spaces for each separate use shall be provi�.�d;
(I) Day nursery (cllild:ren) , one spac� �'�r ever,y four
children, plus one space for. eacl�. em�loyee
(2) 1NSTTTUTIONSs
• (A) C�nva_escent homes; institutions �or the aged; �n-
stitutions �or children; t�relfare or correct,ion �n-
stituti.�ns (full time care) , a minimum of four spae�s
per use; in addition, one space for each .fa_ve beds
� for patients, plus one adcl.itional space ior each
twa employees;
(B) Haspi�tals, a minimvm af six spaces p�r hosp�tal, in
addi�tion, o?�� space for eac� two bPds, incl.uding
, bassinettes, plus otle adclitional space �c�r each tw�
einployees;
(3) PUI3L IC ASSEMBLY:
(A) Churcn, a minimum o_f six �paces per church, in �
additian, one for each six seats or �vel�re �eet of
bez7ch length;
(l�) L�brary, one s�ace for each four hundred square _feet
o_f �ross floor area, plus one s�ace for each two
empl.oyees;
(C) Auditorium or meeting roornS, except schaols, a rnin�.-
murn of six spaces per assembly, ii� additi_c�n, nne
spac� for each six sea-ts �r twelve _feet of b�nch
].ez�gth;
(D) Colle�e, corrunercia�, one sp�ce for ea.ch six seats
in classrooms, plus ot�ae space for each �two employees;
� (E) Nursery schools, elementary� or high schoo3s, two spaces
per teacner; minimum of eight �paces per school, in
addition, one space for each twelve seats or twenty-
four feet of l�ench len,gth in: the auditorium or assembly
room or, if nane, �the sum o.f 'the 'c1�SSrooan seating �
: capacity, plus ora:� sp�ce for each two employees;
(�') Passeng�r terminal (�us, air ar rail),, one spac� �o�
� each five hundr. ed square �'eet of gr�ss floor area,
plus one space for each two employees;
i
. _ . _ �_ . . _, .... ,_: .. , „w�
,_. . _ i
� Pa�� 4 ��
PC Staff Report
2/�-7/76
�,.
(4) SPORTS 1-iND COI��IERCIAL AMUSEMFNT:
(A) Stadium or race �Lrack9 one space for each faur
seats or e�:.ght feet of bench len�th;
(B) Ind�or arena or �Lheater, one space for each four
seats or eight feet of bench length;
(C) Bovrling �11ey, five spaces for each alley, pl.us one
space for each two �mployees;
__
(D) �ance hall or ska�ting rink, one space for each one
hundred sc�uare �'eet of grosS flopr area, plus one
space for each two einployees,
�
(E) Amusement park, one sp�.ce for ea.ch one uhousand squar� ,
feet of gross area, plus orie space for each two
, enlploye�s; �
(5) COP�ERCIAL:
(A) Retail stores zn�lvd�..ng restauran.�L, cafe, iavern,
night c7.ub, but oth�r �than in sul�p�.ra�ra�7h (13) below, ,
minimum -L-hree s�dces per use and� in addition, one �
space .fo.r each five hundred squai^� feet �ross floor
area; plus one space for �ach two ern�lo�yees; .
(�) Service or repair shop and r�tiail store lzandling
� bulky rnerchanc�is�, such as automabiles �nd furniture, �
mii�im.um thr�e spaces per use arid, in addition, one �
spaee for each five hun:dred squax^e feet of gross �
floor area, plus one space :for each two employees, �
(C) Commercial or prof�,ss�_onal ot'fice space, one space �
�er five hundre�. square feet of' ilaor �r�a, '�lus one ;
��ace for. each �stablisrLment, plus ane spac� for �ach �
two employees; �
(6) INDUSTRIAL: �
;
(A) tiVho"lesale or freight terminal (wa�;�r, air, ra�.1 or �
t-ruckirlg) , one space for eac�i employee on thP 7_argest �
shift; �
�'
(B) Si;ora�e, one s�ace for each- employee on th� 1;argest f
shi�'t;
(C) Manufac�uring or processing, one space fo-r each
einployee on the lar�;es�t shift;
�' ('T) I�equir�m�nts for typ�s af buildin�s and uses not '
,
�.
- ;
,. ..:.,. � ,_:... ..� �., ..�,,.., .
.. ._. . . _ _ __
_. _ _._._
�,
. i,
� Rf
.+ 4�
• � �r
�.. PAGE 5 �..
PC Staff Report
2/�7/76 `'
�>'
�,,: � i?
�tr
�;
specifically lis�ted herein sh�ll be determined by tY�e �;
planning commission, basPd up�n the requirements of E,
comparable uses listed�� ��
4
sha11 �e amended i�o read: `'
�
;s
"18.60.120 Minimum S�.ace r� uirements: Off-str�et parking '
, ;�hall be provided �'
accordi.ng to the following standards, regardless of the zone in
which the use, building, establishment ar d�velopment is located. ;`!
Any building, �stablishmPn-t • or development nnay elect to def.ine __
separate use areas which together total the gros� floar area as �'
defined in this code and apply these standards separatel_y to those ;;
uses. ;�
TYPE OF USE PI�I�KSNCx SPACES k�LQUII3.ED �'
� (1) R�sidential s���
_____ �;
�
(a) one or two-family 2_ sp�ces per dwelling uni��; i;
dwel�ing (may be tandem) °c
j'i
(b) multi-family dwelling 1,5 spaces per dw�lling unit �'
;�
� (c) rooming or baardin.g 1 space ior each guest: rr�om plus .
house 1 space for the owner
(d) h�t�ls, mo-tels, moto� 1 space for each. guest room plus ,
hotels, etc. 1 spac� for the own�r `;.
�
(2) Institutional . k,
�,
- - �,�
(a) convalescent, nursing 1 s�ace per 2 beds 3
: azzd oth�r health homes, �i
sanitarium, rest home, �
� home for the aged a�zd ��
other resident care �
facilities � �
�;
X
(b) hospital 12 spaces per bed �'
��':
(3) Public and Semi--Public Buildings �
.�.__ - ------ �,
(a) auditoriUm or meetin.g 1 space for each� 60 sq. ft. o�' �
room (other than church gross floor area or where seating ��
or school) is fixed ta the f_loor, one space �u
, for each 4 s�ats or. 8 feet of bench l'
length. �.
� � �
t
;�
, � � �age 6 ;, .
PC Staff Fh;�ort
2/Z7/76
�^ .
(b) chux�ches, clubs, 1 space �'or every 6 fixed seats or
lodges every 12 ft. of l�ench length and/or ,
every 100 sq. ft. gross floor area '
� where no perrnanent seats are
main-L-ained.
(c) 7_iUraries, museLUns, 1 space for each 400 square feet
ar�t �;alleries of gross �'loor area
(d) pre-school, day nursery 5 spaces p�us 1 space per c1_assroom
kindergarten
(e) elementary, junior 7_0 spaces plus 1 space per class-
high school or equi
—r--.-�.-- , .. _
.
��� pa�e 7
� + PC Staff Report
2/17/76
,:,
�` (f) of��ice buildings 1 spac� for each 350 sq. ft. of
business arid pro- gross �'loor area
fessiona3 ofFices
(g) pharmacy 7_ sp�ce for each 300 sq. ft. of
gross floor area
(h) eating and drinking 1 space for each 100 sq. ft, of
establishments groas floar area
(i) mortuary 1 space �or each 4 s�ats or 8 ft.
of bench length in chapels
(5) �ommercial Recreation
(a) amusement park 1 space for each 1000 sq. �'t, of
patran serviz�ig area
(b} billiard ar pool 1 space for each 300 sq, ,ftp ot
hall �ross floor area
(c) Y�o�Nling alley 5 spaces tor each bowling Iane '.
i
;
(d) danc� hall, skating 1 space for each 300 sq. ft. of ;
rink, gymnasium gross 1'loor area
(e) indoor arena, th�ater 1 space For each 6 seats or 12 fte '
stadium of bench �_ength
(5) Industrial
(a) e:�cept as specifi- 1 space for �ach �mployee on �the n
� cal.ly mentianed l�ere- 1az gest shi�t ar 1 space for each �
in, industrial uses 100Q sq. ft. , �ahichev�r is lar��er �
list�d as permitted in �
M-2 an.d N!-3 zones =
• �
(b) storage operations, 1 space for each employee on the �
rail or trucking l.argest shi�t or 1 space f�r each ;
freight terminal 1500 sq. ft. , w,l�ichev�r is lar�er �
(c) laboratories and re- 1 space �'or �ach empl.oyee �n the
� search facility lar�est shif't or 1 space for each �
' S00 sq. �£t. , wh:ichever is 1.arger
(d) wholesale or reta5_1 1 s;pac� ,�or each 1000 sq. ft. of
(industrial) gross floo:r area, but not less than
sales & service� 10 spaces for each estab7_is�ment
C7) other Uses �
� Requirements for types of buildings arid es�a�lishments not '
specifica_lly listed herein s'�.a11 be detPrmined by the Pl,anning
• Commission, based on tr�e requir�ments of camparable usese
,_
, .. , , .
� . , , , .. . ,:
� � y
`� PAGE 8 �,__
PC Staff. Re�ort
��',
2 j 17/76
18o60.T60 Access. As now reads: "(b) Access aisZes shall be
' � of suffici_ent width for all
vehicles turning and marleuvering, and according to the minirnum stand-••
ard shown on f i�u.re �l. "
shall be amended to read:
18.60.160 Access. (b) Minirnum stand�rd� �or parking stall
length and width, aisle width and maneuve.ring
space shall be determined from the i'ollowing table and diagram.
ANGLE OVERALL
l�ROM STALL CHA�TNEL (P) AISLE CUR.B LENGTH
: CURB I+�IVTH�B� S�TIDTH WI�TH �c�_�PER STALL �X�
parallel 9'0" 9 'p�' 12 �p�► 23 t���
9i�n �_7r[�.i� 12. �p�► 1g�0o►
3�0 9 , �„ �7,9„ 12 �0�� 19,p��
10'0" 18��'� 12 �0'� 2Q ����
:�•, � '��� 19 �9�� 15 ���P ]_2o�ir
�° 450 9 �6�� 20 �2�� 14+0�► 13'�„
10 �U�� 20'6 i' 14'0'� 14'1"
9 '0'� 21'0" 20 '0" 10'5"
600 9'6" 21t�jri l�'��On 1].aOn
�
Z_0'U" 21'6" 18'0�' 11'F�° �
P
9 '0" 19'0'� 24'0" 9'0" '
t
��o g ,6„ l� ,0„ 24,0,� ��6,� �
l� '0" 19�0 0� 2�'0�� 10 9 0�� a
;
Aisles accommoda�l;ing two direction � '
traific, or a"llowing access fram
both ends shalZ be not l�ss �han C k
24' in wid�th (C) . Parking at '
oth,�r an�les pezmitted, provided �
that each space �onta�.ns a rec- �, : �
tangle of not l�ss than 9 ft.. in -` �;:•- -" � k
- widi:;h and 19 :�t, in 1�ngth and �
_
an apprapriat� aisle wi�.th as � �! � � �
�
de-Lermin�d by in-l;�i�po7 ation of the � \� �
� above table. �
d,, s
_� '� -
� X )� �
{
PAI�KTNG DIAGI�.AM �
- 4
`.� .. , , �. :. .. .__.;�.. ._.. .
� _
_ _ ;;
���.
� r � ��� ^ ,
. �� �.k:� �;
smAF�� r��oR� �
Tigard. Planning Gommission �`'�
M�rch 2, 197� I,
, �:
� S 1-76 �,i
,;
A�encla Item 5.7 ;'�,�I
�+I
SUBDTVISION PREI,IMINARY PT.�T AND VARIANCE j,
'���
A r�quest for preliminary plat approv�al �nd a variance r��' E
the subdivision. cod� provisions requirin.g sidewa�ks on
botYi sides of a str�et f_or ENGZEW�OT� III, a propnsed thi:rd
ph�se subdivision and development o� �he Eng�euroad Planned
Develapmen.t.
STAL'F FINDINGS
1 . The p .raposed subd.:ivisi�n is th.e thii�d phase of a Planned
Dev�lopment approy�d in 1�72 by the City af �'igard. '
�i
u
r':
2. Thc �ubdivisio�l con.forms to the general plan and program i�'
for �f;he planned Dev�lopment with th� ex:cep-�ions r��'; 1 ) �
development af S.W. 115�h. to Dlorth Dakota a c�ndition '�
�� �i;hP Planr�.ed DevelnpmEnt �.pprov�l; and L� sid�walks on
ba�th s?des of the streetso ;,
l;
3. VariancES far sidewalks have previously been granted
�'nr t3�F pr�eceeding two ph�s�s o However, the Planning �,
Commission granted those variances on the assumption �
�•_ tha� direct pedestrian acce�s was grovide�l to �those l.ots
noz s�z���d by sa.de��va:lks from a pedestra_an. trai�. to
th� rear of �:ach of_ •those 1ots, in the gr��nwaf.
�-. Construction. af those im�rovemen�ts (streets, sidewal_ks,
rain. a-r�ains, sewers, etc. ) ca.11ed �'or. by ordinance w:ill
' be to specif_ic�.txon o� �th� Public �'orks Dept. , un.less ,
specific var�.ances or Exceptions are �ranted by the �
Pl�r�ning Comma.ssion. Chapt�r 17.48 of the 7'igard Code ;
require.s certain find.ings to b� made in support o� the ,
reques� and requires th.� Commi,ssion to"adYiere sL�bstantial7.,y �
to th� abjectiv�s o.f. �the par�icular regulation" . . . sought
varied.
�
5. �hp p.rece�ding �two ph��e� of ErglPwood were in a configuation '
that alloweci rear acc�ss to lots nflt p .rovided sidewaik� -
this �h�s� in.ver. ts thn subdivisa.on pat�tern to put the i
cul--d�-sacs an the autside of the loop, mini�nizing the
number o�' buildin� sites having a�ce�ss to the greenway
and. path.
6. �taff r�otes �t�aa� the "�chool and �ark site�' shown an
�Ghe Engl.ewooca Pn �l.an is nat in.clud�d in thi� plat. �'h.is
seems ta b� � departtare :£rom the applicants prev�ous
�ra�;t3c� of platting publir, areas as he pr4c�eds.
� :
�. _ _ , :. __.
`�
' �... �V W�A,...i Report
�c'l�',B 2
T�em 5. 5 (S 1�76)
3/2/76
7. Several corner lots in th� proposed SLI�CI.,1V1SlOM will
ha�%e much rEduced backyarcis du� �o the Tigard req�ire-
ment for .front sE-L-backs adjacent any street. Perhaps
c;or.ner. lots ough�t ta be large� that usual.
8. The greenway adjacent phase �II mu��t be landscaped
as part of the project a�•r�ements �o be exect�t�d by
�he dEVeloper.
STAFF RFCOMI�'IEND�T�ON
To b� giv�n after publ.a.c t�stimony.
�
�
�
_ ,
� . . ,
__ _ _ _ _ _ ._ .�.. ..,�.�.._. �:��..._.._
u��`���Ja.�.� �t�.J�"-'
,���`5"'� �-'��- :�«ti""' '°,--;
�
• ,,�,
' �.� s °�%�
, �, ,,� ��. � .
, ���,��
�k`'.� f�� c-, �''c�� �'ft9'rf� �
._...-----,_,,.,---..-----°' ��,�`r i� .� � 3'�
S ,� ���'}` � 1t
� � � . 1 �v.�A I . t . . . .... ._ .- . , �
. . . . .. .. �� � 1�'� ( � �? t . � .
-a� -�•1',..-r � � � �`�'�
I
'� � T�,
: � �� ri p �:�G�J � T A7� l"�'� .
� .�
4♦ � 0
. s.;-:�- �' � ;,� � ���o� � �
, �,
,
. �` i - �
. • t `trM?� �^' o0
�,,,../ _ .�., ._..__... i �� 1C�����
� � �t �
/� ta�ta: �,� , _ ..� ' � ,T.
% �,/�At,�7 A.�J`'�/-� '.K , . fn . . t.o? L.. � � :
' (f) z- rJ...��� . ' '•�. '•' ' 7) . . .
, ..._._ , . . .I�a� \ oz� Q
. _....__._.__ ___._.,_..__.._ � �t � � �3,��f �;_ � ,
' � � � �x..' � i(i�. } � � � � .
^ t I � � . . . . �
i �� �_ � `
. �` ^ j � ' 1�-.. . . � . . � � .
,,�,� � � , �,-
t
� � ., i \3o t
t �L f ��,,�r � �. � i ,
-- i `i !
) . F
� 1 I ?
. � � j ,� i � �., - ,. � . 'll
j � ` � ' 'I
. � ;
: � � ' ; r
. � ; ; � i _
. { � :
. ; ` �
� � ��i � - � .
; ' �
- � � � j . ! , �_ �.__ -
� . ; �,��� �
r �, �... .
, -._ _ . .
; r. _Y..
______ __..�_
: � � .
� � � ,
Q� ,
_ ; .�
.
. �; . r .
� _ __ _�.. .�.� � . �
_.. ,���..�. .__.a�_._���.._ �. .
: ;
_ . ,
G .
,
_,
�
�,. � .
A K�1� S SO C 1 f�'T�: iiiiiiii f 1 C :� � iiiiiii�
� Ple�nnin f En9in�� ring ��Surveying
9 �
Febr.uary 10, 19 76
091G95Q
The Honorable Planning Commissiori
City, of Tigard
12420 S .W. Main �treet
Tigard, Oreaon 97223
�I R�: Pr�liminary plat approval, Englewood, Phase ITI for Conunon--
� weal�Lh Proper.tie�, Inc.
G�ntlemen:
On beha7.f of Commonwealth Properties, IZZC. , Vif�.ker Associates, Tnc.
�i�r.eby rec�uests that tl�e f_ollowi.ng variance be granted in con--
junction ��ith your consi�ex�.ta.on of Phase TII of tYie preliminary
plat af °1Eizc�lewood". Phase III consists of 76 sing�.� family lots
a.nd a "Common Greenway°' along the creelc on north portir�n �f p�.a•t.
The variance requested and evidence pertaining thereto are as
� foll.ows:
Variance .from the subdivisian orc�i.ixanc� wlzerein sidewa7.ks are
r�quired on both sides of street, as �ollows: (Section IX A.3)
Sid��aal,ks to be provided on Ieft side (outsid�) only on fu11
lengtY�. o:E S.T�I. Cottonwood Lane .
�'or evidence in favor of this request we hereby suYamit as fa,llows:
A. There are special circwms tances in the faat that a,ddztional
ped�stria.n circulation is }�ei.ng pruvid�d va.a the commozi gre�n-
way area with connection to residential street�.
B. Tlie variance pr�v�,de� -the n�cessary means for provi,si;on of
improvement (paths and landscaping) to t�e �oznmon gxeenway I,
area for public us�.
� .w�.; c �=u�; ar,rP will not b� detr,zmenta7, to '
C. The grant:iiiy c.� �.��.�� �. -
tlZe public health, safety^or welfare i.n that each ��s�,�.ent
W,ill have reasonable acc�ss to the pedestrian ca�rcula�ion
system without undue confli�t �vith velzicular traffic.
�,
10550 S.W. ALLEN BLVD., SUITE 223 7 BEAV'ERTON, OREGON 97005 / 603 -643-9410
_ .:_,. .., ...:,. ,..,..� ., ,... .,.zr ,:.�M ...__ . , y.
�� � � ��� � � � �
0910950
�,,,' Febz�x�ry 10, 1976
P age 2
A maximum of one str�et Crossirig wiXl be requ�,red �o gain
access to pedestrian Cl.rCLl�.c1t],011 system. Th�.s Woulc'� be the
case even a:f sidewalk was providecl on iruzer side of S .W.
Gottonwood LanE. Said proposed pedestrian cixculati,on sy�t�in
is shown on that exliibit submitted, enti,tl�d "Composi.te
Utility Plan" (sheet 9 of 10 sheets of improvement plans)
and on the preliminary plat fox Phase TII.
D. 2'he granti,n,g of this v�riance i,s in canformance with the ;
�xinc:i.ples c�f the P•-D plann�d district and assists �,n r�-
tention of the aesthetic qualiti,es of tl�e area. �his
variance is also in conformance w�.tk� similar conda.tions and
� pravisions irn�lem��nted in Constructa,on o� Engl�wQOd Phases
T �nd TI.
With this variance, we here.by xeque�t yaur cor�sideration and
approval nf Phase III of th� preliminary p].at for "Eng�ewood°
with app�c�pri�.te c�n.c�ition s.
Respectful.l;y Subm;itt�d,
�:'` GBARER I�,S S(�CIA7'ES, Ti`I�'.
E�
F
J ack A. Ritchie
�laizner/DesignFx
J1�R;a t
cc. Erni,e P1 a�t
�.
��
_ ,, ,����""� ^�.,^'� ,
� �
" � �
�- '
Jar_ua-ry 26, 1.;�76
^rr. Tom Sp��r
�,'ashin;ton Co�nty
Puhlic j�Iorks �partmEn.t
Co�znty Court Hou�e
z 50 r�o. 1st Ave{zu�
�IiZlsbaro, Oreoon 97�z3
Re�'erPnce s ��lc��rc�od P1.anned L�evelopm�nt �C 2--73
ncar Tom:
`i'.he C�,�y of `.1'i;�.rd, on July 9, l�'�`73, �PP�'oved a Pl�zned �7ev�elopmen�L
�or �in�1e ax?d �,zul.ti.-ia�n�ly resic��?�.•�;ial deve.lop;nent an a 100 a�re
pa•rce1. o� land at �ch� coi�l�r of Si'? 1_21�-t �?�d ��'Y•/ Sc1a.o��s �.��.r�y Road.
/�; �he fihird phas� of -l;his pro jec� extends �he existin� 115�1 Sti�eet
�` :ir�to -t;lze pro ject area. ��`h�s crea-tes a prob°!er.�, ha�v�ver, :i.a1 t1�at
115tr south of -L-h� P:La�;�t 1�ouzdary is una_rnproved an a ?_5 �t. ri�ht-- '
ot-tvay. To correc� -L'hi� maz-ter, concli�Uion nun�ber 12 0�' '-�'�,� zone ahan�e �
s-ta-te�a
�+That thc� �ortion of the I'lairyaaLd Zeveloprn�l�.t sou-�h �f �'��r �Z�:Le-
�•�ood Ftoad (rprin��a;ood Drive) shall not be ��1�aiv�_cted urtil
stzc��. t�.m� as S'��i 13.5�h i3 brough�c up to existing Ci�ty s�reet
standards. "
Conz�ianv��alth l�as sta�;nd tllat th� caunt�r has allow�ci �,��o homes to be
construc'ted an 17.5th wi-tho��L reqviriia� su?fic�ent �e`�back for future
�treet widenin�. In actdition, t,��ey state that tlze lack nf ri�,ht-af
trray p�ecluc�es th�m �rom providin� �he r�quired streei ii??provement.
They are `c�zerefore requesting tlza� this cpnc�.i-t�.on b� dropped.
Tam, I b�liev� it absolutely essential tha�� �his por�ion of 115th be
irnproved concurr�ntly vritlz Common����alth t s 1 hasc .iTI of the l�,l�waod
nrojec-�. Otherwise, v,re wil.l have a v�ry poor situa�ion ���it�i a lar��
��w�,�;zri �:ton oon:nect�d -Lo a coll�ctor s'�s^eet (Tto. Dakataj by a�proxi- ;
' ^�� - I �.m therefoz�e re uestin �,
mate:Ly 550 feet af c�irt and grdve�. r�,u�« Q g ,
that you Gon�aat �l�e properties 1.oca�ed in you:r jurisdi�tion -'tp see '
i;f ad.di-tional ri�ht-of-way �an be ob�;ained. Tiay I po�n� out tk�.�t
���hile an a�3.d.i.t�.ona1. 25 ��et of right-of--way is needed, the improv�-
ment could be provided ox� 1.ess ri�ht-of-t�,r�� to mi�;i�ate t�,e i�:�pacts ;
� of tlle wid�ning on the hauses built in ��Ze county. For 3.ns�t�nce, ��!'j
side;�;aLks aould b� placec� an t�ae City side only. ' •`;
�'?
ra
C?
i+
i:;;
.ri
T
�`.,
. . �
. � `
r �
����� � • . � . I
p�g0 2
N'1�'. �'OTil Sp�'cix' 1
Januax�y 26 9 197�i '
� �
� �
T taill apprecia�:e youx� ass�.s�nce an -�his matter and am sure �hat
you �oz��-ur with n1y conc�rn tha� this matter be re�n�.ved t�e�are
1'has� I�T of �. �le�rood comm�nces oonst�,�uction�
Sa.ncere�.�r,
cx� o� �r�.�r�
;
� �
� Dick Bolen
�lann�.ng D3.�ector �
�
DI3;pt . �
cc: Larry Frazier, ��1ash. Co. Plann3.ng Dir�ctox� i�
L�n.�le�vood File ��
,�, J'ohn H��an, �.n.�a.n�ering Dopt e ' �I;
�'" F3r�xGe C�ark, City Administrator .. i
Joe Gruela.ch, Fire P��arshal.l
..
� �
��
� ��
I�!
���
�i
;a
iy
,
fi
�
� »
f.
� f,:
,
�. ' . '
� .
� r, .. . .., , ; ,., ::.:
.. �` C
� .. �n, 9��"��{ .
rf
a� f-,
STAFF REPORT
�,A Tigard planning Commission
I�arch 2, i976
ZC 1-76
Agenda Ztem 6.1
ZDNE CHNNGE
A request by Gordon Carpenter for an amendment of the TigarcJ
7_one �Iap from R-7, single family residential to A-2, multi-
family residential locatec� in the vicinity of 11,535 S.W. 98th,
(Wash. Co. tax map 1S1, 35C, tax lot '90D) �
STAFF FINDINGS
l. Propased developmerit i� for 32 dWelling units on a single
2.83 acre parcel. The net densi�y is approximately 11
units per acre.
2a The site is designated a medium density r�sidential on
the NPCI #2 3.and use plan, which pertains.
3. The sit� is adjacerit an A-2 Plann�d Development zone
(Scott Court development) which is developed at a densa.ty
o� 7 unitu per acre.
�" 4o Right-of-way dedicatian on S.W. 9Eith Av�nue is nece5s.ar ta
Y
provide the add��tional 10 feet nc�ce;�sary for street Widehinc�.
(This dedication �iLl reduc� the rtutnber of units allowahle '
on the site)
5. 5etbacks of the builcJings from the Railro�d right-of-way
to the rear af thP site shauld be adequste to p�ovid� fo�
sound and sight screening, a.s w�Tl as to minimize
interference af vibratinns g�nerated on the railro�rJ
riyht-of-Way with adjacent reszdential usc�.
6. Applicant is �roviding anly one stree� �pp:roach for the
"private road" serving �he proposed dwel)i;ng units.
Tigar�i Cade r�qui�es access to be provic�ed accorciing to
street stahdards
where more t 6
han e
dw 1I.'i
n units are
9
ser�ed---and a].sa provides that `a ��street!�, if a cu1-de- {
sac, cannot be more than 600 feet in length. �
�
k:
7. The Scott Gourt devslopment, adjaeent was Prnposed and in �
being de�eloped as a, planned development in order to �
surmount similar problems to those seen Wi.th this de��lopment. ;�
A1'thQUgh the site is much smaller than genPrally co.nsidered ' . �
desirable for a planned development ap,proach, it 1�oks a �
fx
great deal as if a planned developm�ent wouid furnish the 1x
best vehicle to develop this parcel. �a
��� � � � � � � ��
�'
��
�
_ �.�.-�- - ,
� ,
�,� � ,��
� � '�� � . .. . . . ...t .��4�..
1,j
....�3w � . . ) . . . . .. � . .
. % . `^! . . ��� .
PC Staff Report
Pa9e 2
�^y ITE�1 6.1 (ZC 1-7`6)
3/2/76
a. Alternatively---or pezh�ps additionally, ennlarging the I
site by incorporating eithe'r �f the parcels adjacent
that fron't" Greenburg Road would be desirable.
STAfF RECO�II�ENDATION
to be made following publi.c testimony
�,,'
�:
, �
-. . _::...�.. ., ;._ . ...��__ _ _.,.� �....� �
�__,._ _._. —
__ ,_ ;
, ` _ S� I/4 S�11/�• i��`� f 0 i�`
� , {. W,ASHINGTON �
; ' ��w `�� F�
� I C I ��� , SCALE i
N MAP r
�..
� ;'
Z.C.�N � C�AN�'� �
�
.- -� � � ��
�,,__ � � �,��
. �;, , i ;�
. �r:�:.: y`
� ;� �•��"o:'-n:,��T�j�('�'�
; .�.'`, r,� .._n�q
..,,A,-
� � l2S.�`�._'. M
�
a� � ;.
��° S00 �
� .40 Ac. G�
z
� �
�i m ��
C,S. 8903 "'\ m o�
— o
N , � o
O ��
Q .
� � . . � � � . . . . . \�,.. �
0 9�� � �
fi9.0 "��.. �
5�
a 2 B3Ac. . i eg.00�
� 79v �zzo.���
�
\� .39Ac. !
.
� �
�� � :� � i e s rA'',
�, .� I 50 0 39flc.
�, _ _r.,� r
\ ' c zzoa
c
'` s ss�sa'w
��� '
�r� z 1600
V•O o l.3/Ac• �• - ���� � ��� I.O�Ac.
V `� u �
��.{ � ��
�
��
,� � 10 00 � I 7 Q 0
m � w l.l l Ac. /.00J,4c.
N p � \
(100 °' C.S. 2829 0� �
r —\
�
.36Ac. '
\ •o-
_� �
4 �o �.Z�O � \ � OQ� .Y .
N
Z � /.OO A C. O . O /.OO AC.
— � o
— 8
z
�iY�l�'�-'/1i��/���lll,l%ll/, %%i%%�//i /�%%%/,,% %s'l/.�.%l/�� �iaiiii�iiiiaiiaaiiaaaaai,�ili��ir5i�i • ���;� � ��•� �r - s � i aiia,�/.�/l!!��
�'s�.��s'��'��fl��.'���,��'�/�''/,llll `.i�////.
�89°58�W -� g a�C.h. 5 BJ'SB'W (414.27) �
523.2 '�" '�r.n ,
� � � � �� 633�� N Q /yy I�vQ
a \s✓
S�� MAP L.C. = S 2'7°57 E o m � /� 6D faC.
0
I S I 35C �Q Z °° `
r "
�� _._ .N-89°58�E D69.92...�_.�..__._.._ , ap N� .
� �4�0
� c'.4/!1 G.
�
d� �') �� �. � I�� . ,r'�,'�__ ,.�;,J ,,., �z , �) .,.ri , _,
__ ______ �
- _
.,
_ .. . . .. .. . _ - - " _ _' _ 5�,�'p
y '� _ - �F�� �� �
�;
. L� r ~ x ;�~ - ��; r4 f��I ��`J�,'�..
' �.�,��; _ �,
_ =� � �4 - r'�-�� �x�. � � �T s 3 -
. - - �2�:-..`�� _ -.- .�� � - ,
�. .. . . �. . ,, '` � , -:_ .4 T. . _ - _
� ���TNIS SKETCH !S i4ADE SOLELY FOR TNE�PIJRPOSE AF ASSISTINO . � fi i , g� Y� #� a��� � {s.�d- � *,_�J�� �. �
� IN LUCATIflG.�SpiO�PREtdISES A@�THE COMPAt�Y ASSUMES!CO LtA81LfTY . ,., � f � � �
� � FOR VARIATIOTIS,IF.FNY,�IN DIMc'NSiONS AND LOCATIONS ASCERtAINED � � . ' 2'� � `�Jr�C��" ' �:
� �� s
ev�cTUa�susver. TRANSAMERiCA TITLE F � ��� ' : < - .
; ���_
� � scAS:E lNSURANi,E COMPAMY
- � ' ` � . :�F��� j- c�i� � � �
. $
. c
t � . - . ..�,� . . . • � � � . � �'� � t - � �t,� . ' � � sF .-~��
; .� ��. F3�a.'.�s ra , � . ��� ! ,��.-'�tC �fi Z.�Y
> � - •• ` � +. a �n y { �/+V�
, �J
.'. . . . . .. .�, 4 I .� }-E1e .� a;i.. �� �. G�L,�+_ _
� �v N
�� �. �:. - . . . . ?. .,�
y " • ? t j' r:� �� r�
[t. _� _ .. ._... . __ . _ . ` � � i _�m ��i � "���x
?3-" y;8n"u ',� _9� = #s- :.�x Z r ta j' zr z
! � � ''�`al.;�..•�� . .. .. �. . � � . � ,M: ',�� E � �� � `` � � `�`` `)?y .a€ +7 ..� �F
�C . _c ,L'6.�..,:L, - . � . � � rr�. - '�'$3 OX5 ' r- .�. �' s..��'� . ..
5� 3 . =� a � .fy�'� , t�Eb' f}`.
. .. '� . - .. .. .. � . . v ` � � 1�.�L. .. y fw ��. . �
" j
��_i � N � . � � ' �_ ���,� , c:.7..'` . . ` - . � ' f - -
� . O . � � „� ����J'a� 3��.t., . . � � . . � �� � �--
i. . � ��
. � . .. . � �� ��. � ��� `���. � t�{ . � �.
....� �� .`_..�' ; .fi
•� .
- 7 ��6� .� , �� i - : � ���-=
. .. � . " } . UF ., . .��� _^K '_ _' ..{rt .. i3b � �'�r i,,,{.S a�`'9f,'�_-......�._�.y.....�. �...�-�.-� t �3� x 1-��
� �. _._._._, -^"^---°--'�
_ \ f� --- - x
� • � _ : � � -
�. . - -, ;�, �; i�,n _~ Lr�i �4 - `-`° - ,.��
-, .
�
} ii`.:7 a " /tr, zJ -. � _ �j1�`Vf
� - �'-� - . �r . "7 � w . ` .�>�6 _�„ � � • . . � ... �� - .
t �- .�-
� �.i . ��.J � S.� ���. - .�y w � ' . �w � � ,.. . � � . � -�
. ; � _ � ` f�� �'N � 'i �e �,Q ca.t`� ro i: . � �
� Ct^.;...: ' `' 4� `�c '!�� ±�. �/# 1 .1 . .. ��4 � � � � � t . _. { � a . :. .`-t...-e- '�'''?' �II
�
t,
. :;. �: ____ .. �"`'
�
{ �� � � " ��?H� i ` ti 'F ., ' j, ,,__. 35 . �" �j[ .-,i � N 4� T�' � _ �
� � . y �. � T. �...�� :' . .F..� . �Lr^K._ . .. , .ry�. +� � � �..�1 "�"'{.�'�
� — C ,.. ' . . . . -. . . . � � . .
. 'C; . . / , , ,'�.b8' .. � .. . _...
� . . ,=4'' t , -' '� a'S . . .,$,3 i¢ ..�; ' �� . .� ;_gri . .
r �y...�, ,..
.. �' � - � '.:. '" . �- � z fry�7tt.��¢ a :-jF�,` S� ; ,t. . .
.. � ,.�`� . �z,y _a `t._a t. �. Y .. a�: �:�� �� .a.rr , t � - ��„� .�_._.�-_ .. - . .- . _" .
�i � � ' fi �c,s yf ��. ° -r r �{��� [�J. � . � . � . � � � .
..* .. �. . SS - t {£ \ �. 1 °` ��. i�'f�
: � �,N' �� ���� .- ��,�.:.�.� .e�%.� :xv x�� ,�+� t -i ;� ! . 4,�C�'� . . . . I
� i
� - ��� � Sk.N`�c .�. - �'L �- �4y�ap�. ���y� - � � � ' .. :} �I.I
� iC� ..�t � .� F' Ay�..' L ^i�� .. �`� r. . . � �i.a. - . I
. a
� � t t t 4 ' u $ ` .. ty�'��~ _� �}e. � � .. ..�1�`�.CF-��S'- �`� '. — � . .. Y I.
t + �6 1 � .� ! ..��I)
�' L A �����
, - � rr'. �
; . ._�:: �� , , � _ . 3
-,::
. . , . �. �. ..T...-,� ���- . 'i�� " R.s �� , r . . . . . .'x .. - ,r._.
'
.
t 4.: � D3 _ - -� .w--'
i - ' -- — _ — �__ _ _ -
e� �L- �- -__ ____d�__..____� __. __. �'' � `� � �
� � � ��.: _ � .��. � � � ��'` � ��-� �
« •`� .r�.: ". t��=i s t,
+� ". . . y' '. • . .�L� _ `G�j f�`�::. ..� �`. � � M� � � . . . - ..
i k � 3- ,,y � q.�. � -v� `'�D`� x � a xt;'.,:;r,+, -3�'''. n 4��� 1 •r?�-
':'* ���� .-;,_.._.�.a,` ,. �.�`: . �� ,;� :..���....�_.s_,. �;r.�i� z, '; �%�:;�s.a,,.YC •,i�5f'�' `aY'�F9 �rs_ G' I ::r .,� �:-�,:s.::..::.,...+-."`--'�`' . .,.���..�.i . .
- t� � ` . �t __n . S o�:��[ a � �r'�i1�3 �j'_ "✓, � � ;t - .
_ � � L .,t�,� �, �,,� 5.;� -, V.�O V 0 ����' � �,�,L-��R i✓�i.s�i � a�� ��.
A ��` � ,��~ • r:.;t'tRAfl�SA�IERiGA TIT NSl}R�hi�E-CO �,�a�r ° ' ��`
� `r x� � �' � �; � ,_.�, �`��..,�
- , _ �,s- � ,e �;�-• _ :�'� _ � � �x
�
.:�
��
.,
, ... . . , . , _ ,
.,.
�
X, , ; . . .
� �M
�• ,. • '
. , . . :
s •
_ �. _._ _ ?- z _ ;:
, . _ � ' , . . _ . __
_ _ . .
�,_._. . / ,__ r;;i�.:_��-.' ,�� �,\\//� , __ jr �:I NNwi�o
` : .
.i'`-J � � �� � /�a . �_��__^� a
,f 7 �F.�£ ^ c� � . -r // ' .� ' � � '�.'" �
� ' S �_` � U 1
. 4 Q � � � I � / /
.�" � �f� p �� � . tAN. � -�_
� o / ` c o �
� � ia �,
�� ��/ \� _ c F F N e � (
, . o,�/ �, o , I URG
� � � x 788_8 , -�
� � � ,�– �,
�
.� � � �
i �
� —___._...._- —— -� � � � �' °0 5 � � . ,` �'
a` — � , t i
� � � � -- — — I ,
-�, _.-----X — _ � �� i
C.>,�-� - 1 C7 - —� ��' i
,
� . �1 _ � - �.� _ ;
� .� � �—` �
� � � +X�
___. � �
a � � �
�
� � --- � � I
� � _ � � -x --x
� �. �, �
X
�, . __ � _-�
, � . �. - �
_ � �
- . �
� __.�.�__�_ _�--.-__ __ ..--- _ --� -�------- - _ ��
-� ---x -- —x - �_ --J �Q- �-���-X "
\ .,� � �
`, 0 4 X �
�. . � , ��
a:6 0` =���
X � �_.:._�..�- ua ,
. . � � � X l
€`� � � �� �
�
� � � � �� � ''��'�� . � �� W ^ . ` .
�. lr \ \� � � � � �' � °' ',
� � �
R E A c9
` � � � --�,.,,,�..--' �..�
� e ^ �
`+ � `"\`-�� N —�--__
� -- --- — —-
�e a. x----------�--_-_ _ �, '
\�� � l \a - -- -- _ --__
�I
.� r �i'�'n r�,;� 4
�'�_..� �.�..
(�
GURDON D. CARPENTER
BUILDER—RENTALS
�' 6900 S. W. OLESON ROAD
P�IRTLAND, ORF.GiON 97'223
PHONE 244•3794
F'ebruary 13, 1976 '
City �f Tigard Planning Commission
Ti�;ard C3.ty Ha11 I
Ti�ard, Ore�on 97223 I
Re; Request f'or Zone Cha.nge
from 1�-7 to A-2
�t Tax Lot 900
�-1535 SjN 98th Street ne�.r I
S.W. CTreoxlbur� Ho�d i
Tioard, Ore�on I
City of Tigard Pl annirig Commission;
We ex�close a map of Tax Lot 900 and a proposed plan for devel-
opin� it as a Niultifamily Resid�n.tial. a.r, ea which cani'orms wi.th the
Tigarcl ComprehEnsi�re Zon�i.n� Nap. Our purpose is to :Cormally request
this zone ch�ri�e or Condition�l Use Permit for. this p�rcE3. of land.
�!Ue have studied the greater Portland ara�z, and the Tigard area
in particular� and have concluded from avaiJ.a.ble statistles that there �
�- is a z�eed for. rrlore hauain� in this area, and particularly for duplex
units . A stirvey prepared b� Ap�rtment Data Center showed th�t the.re
vvas a 0� vaoat�cy in dupl�x un.3.ta .
LTtilities needed to �erve this proposed project a.re availabl.e
on. S .'�`. 98�1� 5treet; specific��ly, e1�e,tr�icity, se�ve.r��;e, wat�r, �nd
telephone. The access �t.r. eet is alread;� paved and of sufficien.t
width to serv� the nei�;hborhaodo
;,
V�/e believe this pro Ject is in harrrlony with th.e very �.ttractive ;{
z°esidential ares. an�. when finished and 1_�.�.dscaped would be a distinet �
asset to the adjacent nez�hborhoods. The one stnrey du�lexes would ��
co�for�m Tr�i'th exis�ing architecture of' the area. Utilities and servlces `
needed are a�.re�,dy aet up an� as�a3.labl.e for the clty. The addition '1
of �ha.s pro ject woul.d increase t;he �ax base consirlerably a.nd provide
more income fo.r �the c3�t r to pa for these ui;3.lities and services. �
5 Y
�
�
We here�Nith present this f'ormal request for Lone Cha��,e from �
R-7 to A-2, accompanied b,y the Tax Map, si�e plan with proposed ;,
development, application form si�ned by the own.er and myse�.f, title y
insu.rance policy as �roof af ownership, and our check for the �
req'uested fee.
�
We will be present at the meettn,�; to answ�r an.y furthex� quEStions �
� that maTT �,.rise.
� �
P
��`inc e 1y, �
�
{> G �
a ,
..�'�f p
Gordon D. Carperlter �
�
;
� �..... ,_ _ ,� �
„ , f,.;r'.,t_ i
s �. .,
. i:f
STAFF REPORT � �� '
�'igard Planning Commission
March 2, 1976
�' Z� 2-76 (Kj�lgaard)
Agenda Item 6. 2
PREI,IMINARY PI,�1N - PLANNED DEV�ZOFMENT
A request b,y Orland Kjelgaard f'or cancept approval of a
proposed rgsidentia.l. p]_anried develt�pmen-f; in the vicinity
of 13778-13340 SV�T Ha11 Blvd, (Wash. Co. tax map 2S1 2DD,
tax 1at 5�0) .
STAFF FINDTnTGS
1 . 'c}7e request��. concept approval is for Q•3 us�i.t A-2
(mediu.m den.sity) R�:sidential Pl.anra�cl De�ve,opmPnt in
a�. area. presently zoned R-t' (singl.e family residential)
but designated med3.um density res�.den•tial on the
Tigard Community Pl.an.
2. The site, ar_d thuse bath I�Torth an.cl. South. of it arE
lon.g s'lender lots exter�ding from a narrow (in. rea.a�i�n�
ship to length) frcntag� on I���.1 Blvc].. to �the app�aximate
ali�nm.ent af Farina Creek.
3. NFO �5, (recentlSr formed) has requested that cnncept
approval not be granted, but be defer�red for a month
l; � to al1o� th� NPO to finish deliberations, now in
pra�r�ss, on access provisions to be mad� for �uture
development b�e�wePn Ha17_ 331vd. an.d Fazln.o C'reek. At
- this point, the NP� has de+ermined tha-� a need e��.sts
far suc.h acces�, but has y�et to dete.rmin� the .f�asab�.li�ty
o:£ aaquzring ri.ght of way and obtaining d�velopm�nt
R o.f the n�ed�d ��treet. Prelirninary inqu�.x�y r�vea�.s �hat
other land o�vners, interested .i.n deve�.opment, may be
willi.r�to cnmmi�t �fihemsel.vPS -�o bear the costs of such
a praject prioi^ to developm�nt.
4. The devcl.opment proposed, from a cUncep�ual. point of
view, does nat seem to offer �the amenity usually
s�ught in a �'�.anned D�velopment. l�erh�ps -�he ar.ea
d�:vot�ci to ��str�et�� sur�ace :is a factor in �ha.s. �t
is a�so possible that th� developer i� �,iu�p1� t.rying
to over �ui]_d the site. Also, th.e davelopers indicatec�
intent to se11 the ��1at;s�' in tl�e deve]_opment on ari
individua� ba.sis fc�r mu:ttipl:e dwellin:gs°,th�t� app�a� °to
b� common wa�.� bu�,ldings which makes staff somewh�t
apprehensive af ownership p�tterns. Wi�thout mo�e
explici� aetail o�' the covenants restrictiaMS, and/or
development contr. ols the devel�p�r� e�peG�s to be able
to exe�t, s�taf�' feel.s th,is aspect insufficient�y
�xplainec�.
.�
�::
�.
;,
' ,.�- ._
, ��: 4�'*
PC St��'f �tepor�
page 2
' ITEM 6.?_ (ZC 2-76)
� 3/2/76
5� �}�iere are sev�ral informational d.efici�ncies urYiich should
be corr�c�ted be:fnr� this propas�.1 i.s considered �us�ther:
a. �Ioo.r �1��cratians of the dwel.ling �units � necessary '
ta determine how the proposed bui�.dings "sitf' I
on th� si�e;
b, flaor arPa ratio - f'or comparison to similar
projects;
c. de•tail (cross sections and �leva�tions) of
propo,sed retaining wa.l'1 in floc�d plain;
d, ped�striari circulata.on,
�. flnal grading (or a�proximat�) ,
6. The l�pplic�n�'s statemen.t with respect to cam,prehensive
pl�n con,formancP is in error in st�ting -�ha� the pr�sent
R--7 (sir�gle family� �oning do�s not conform �;o �ctte
c�mprehensive plan (page 29 App�.acant�s ,Stat�mentj .
7. Appar�ntly th� develc�pmen,t wi11 dischar�� i�s storzu
dz��i•nag� dir�ctly� in-�o Fanno Creek. Some pravisiUn
for retez�s�.on and slowed rel.�ase of s�torm runof�'
, ��:.. au�ht tc� b� con,s�.dered.
�. The project expr�essly includ�s a request fc�r variance
o� str.eet standards .�or •the �pproximately �00 �'oot
"private road.°t az�d of th� platta.ng xegulations for lo�s
in a subd:ivision (access -tc� public R/W, "centerline
� description" ) .
9. The R.V. storag� area s�.own in the �`lood plane is a
' good us� or�.inarily to put flaadab]_e land to; however
the site chas�n h�ppens ta be in th�t area off�ring the
most �meni�y for enjoymEnt of the site, and ca�#'a_ic�ts
c��rectly wi.�h ac��ss �to �tY�e «Park�' shawn.
STAF'F T-?.ECUMM�NDATTON
St�ff recom.mends tha�t th.is mat�er be tabled for on.e mon�h
t�o allow �he de�r�l.op�r to generate addi.tiana'l informatic�n
to all.ow f_or pc�ssibl� desi.gn modificatioz� and to allow the
NPE� to fini.sh its d�libe�ata.ons cc�n�Prnin� acce�s in �h�
area and communicate their conclusions to the d,evelnper
and the p1ar�.ning commission.
�
�: .. ..._:.
_ _ _ _ .
__ _ ___
�,,
� ' J� • �`� f�i
1�� \. '� �;.!
i
r ��II
� February 13� 1976 `s�'
(��
�'
�`
�''
G
i
k
Tigard Planning Commission �
Tigard City Hall �
Tigard, Oregon w
;
Kje,I�;aard Planned. Development at 13778/1�8�0 S.W. I-iall Blvcl. �
I
The propased development consists of a rni.x of multi-famxly �
dwell.ing units, arranged in clusters ranging from -�riplexes �to i
9-�1ex. The pro�erty alre�.dy has one d.uplex and one si�g:Le- �
family residen.ce, which have been continuouvly rented for up ;
ta 19 years.
A zone change from R-7 to A-2 is rec�ueste� as a pre- ��
.requisite to considerati�n of the preliminary plat f'i.��d here-
� with, and is the subjec-� of a separate appZicatioz�e
The statutory requirements for substantiation and suppo�t
of �he zdne change �pplication are adc�ressec� below.
I' The planned development proposes a multi-family subd.ivisiAn
' which will expand and enhance the establYShed renta7. ciwelling
�' usages at this site� and wi11 improve the overall recreational
, potential of the lower portions of the �a.te, within the flord
plain af Fann� Creek.
I�eve�.opment pr�ferab7.� at this Site
Medium-densit,y development of this location deserves, at
�his time, a high priori�y in re�.ation to other �oten�ial sites.
This high rati.rLg is demonstrable on several counts9 as the pro-
gosed developments
1. Is less than one mile from tlle retail/eomm�rcial area �f
downtawn Tigard� with acctess by an existing S�a't� Highw��
(#217) which is pYanned for future iner�ased traffic flows
Nor�thwar�d and. �outhwardo
�
`� .
� _
_ _
_ __ __ _. . _ ..
_ �,.
� , , �f
� � �`'
, �;;:
_ � _ February 13, 1976 4�'
��
�
� ��
�. Is very conveniently located with respect to existing �,;
industrial. plan.ts and to lands desi�nated for �uture j�
industr�.al development, £aci.litating lacal emplaymen� �;
opportuniti�s. ``'"
�:,
3. Is favorably Yocated with respect to three m�jar commuter ��
arteries, namely Intsrstate #Z� sligh-�ly more than one �;;
mile and to Pacific Highwa.y (99W) � slightly less than one ��
mi1e, and to #21g, about 1.25 miles. `�hus the choice of ;'
� this loca�tion provides easy access to all major commuter ";�
rnutes as well as to long-distance travel routes. ;'.
;:.
�. Meets a demand �'or housing af a11 types� which has exceeded �',
the supply �or approxim,ately t�ree ye�.rs. The gap is E�.!
widenin � and develo ment of an t e of housin is timel . �'"
g P Y YP g y �.�
;:;�
s Compares with. anly oi�e oth�r lanci parcel designated on the !':�
� Comprehensive Plan for •Ux�ban Msdium Densi�ty Residen�ial°t. �''
That other �.ocata.on is smaller in over�ll area ar�d alr�ady f;i
appears ta be �.eveloped �a a higher in�ensity, thus :;
a.ffnrding a narrower range of choice to developers. b'urth�r, `;:�
it is slightl� less �'a.vorably located as far as proximi�y �'`;
c,;
t� znajor employment opportunities and �.rea retail shopping ;:;
is coz�.cernecl.
;� <'`
6. Constitutes � re-zoning action meeting thP public interest
in tha� i� will, bring the zoning into con�'ormity with th�euch
Comprehensive Pl�n� in line with the "Baker decision". �>. .
re-zor�ir�g is �;ommonly treated as an obligation of civic ��
a.dminis�t��,�ians.
�:+;:
�,,,.
P
�1
Conformit �rith Com reher�sive lax� �,.
v �
� F����
���:�
Th� �rea af the praposed development is desi�nated °fUrban �'�
Medium-Density Residentia'1" in the current Compx�ehensive Plan. f;
fihe present zoning (R-7, single �'ami?y residential) is not a.n �;'
con�ormity with that Comprehensive Plan, but the propos�d zonin.g i;•�
A�2 would bring the zoning into campliance with the pla�. Sueh ��.
a resul� would alsa satisfy the requirem�nt� a�' the Baker dec- �:
�sion (Baker vs. Gi�;y of Milwa,ukie, 1975) . Evidently� �idelity ���
ts the provi.sians of the Comprehensive Plan is excellent. (;
�
The proposed devel,opment is also in character with the his- ��
� tory of the pro erty, as multi-family rentals combined with �he �`_
(underdeveZoped� r�crea�ic�na,I values of �t�e land have b�en �the �;
sol.e use �or appraximately �.9 years, s�
� � � ia�
;,.;
The planned density is sub�t�.nta.ally less than the allowab�.e
value imposed by the Plan. Data an �his and demograghic data ��
� are shown in Apgendix "A", (analysis of subda�visian) . ";'
�7
�:
x�
¢
��
_ ��
_ .. _�
� ..
. �. �.
�- 3 -- F�bruary 13, 1976 I
The developer will instal: �
1. Sanitary sewer collectioz� system dischargirzg to the �
unifa.ed sewage agency 60°' int�rceptor across Fanno Creek. �
2. Water distributian system to City and/or Wate•r Dis�tr�.ct �
Standards, connected to Water Di.strict 12" main on th� �
East side of S.W. Hall Boulevard. Fire protection �
services, hydrants, etc. wi11 be included. �
3. Storm drain.age collection s�rstem discharging to Fanno �
Creek. j
�
4. Minor improvements to private recreation area loca��d �
across Fanno Creek, bounded by':�the creek and the U.S.A. i
intercept�r� right�of-way. Gated access will be pra-
vided to the interc�p�ar x°ight-of-�ay for link-up with
the walking and riding trails which are understood to !
be plarin.ed for the in�terceptor strip. A Iow-cost pec�es- {
trian bridg� is��p�oposed �'or �.ccess to the recreational �
area across Far�no Creek, subjec�; to requirements �'or �'
construction within the flood p],a,in. Existing trees �
will be retained to znaxim�am extent possible.
The develop�r �oes not at present plan to Uuil.d dwelling
units on the subdivision. The lats will be marketed. ta others
who wi11 �rovide desa.gn and construction. All necessary ,provisions
covenants and simil�,r cantrcl provisions will be incorporated in�o
sale agreement� with 1ot buyers as zna� be requirr�d by �the City of
TYgard to ensure faitYiful compliance with the dbjec�ives of a !
Planned Development. Design standards, esthetic criteri.a, and �
e�viranmental development standards� such as landseaping� wi11. be
submitted on reque�t for review and approval.
G
Impacts 4
The additional Ioad� im�osed upon pubZic services, such as
schoals; police, fire prnt�ction� water and sewer services are ' �
those normally to be expected fram an in�'lux of same 120-125 per�- �',
sons into the neighbourhood. The magnitude af these impacts is �
about 9-1Qf less than that corresponding to th� maximum densit�r �,
permitted under the Comprehensive P1an designation.
The propose� sewer collection s stem could have a f ��
Y avarable i.
impac t on t he neighbourhooel across SoW. Ha11. Boulevard in areas
upland of thE uppermost end af this subdivision. Prov:ided advaz�ce
agr�em�nts prior to detail engineerin� desi�n could be concluded
with tk�e City of T�.gax�d� The subdivision sewage collection {
'•� �
u
ii
. . �':
i.
. #
,
, �`` '�, f'I
t�
�:;
- � - February 13� 19'�6 ?
,:�
. (
system could be sized to receive whatever additional flows the
City may gr.oject. Similar arrangements ar.e possible in respect ''I
to storm drainage, as another potentially favorable impact. �,
Development of this property may stimulate similar develop-
ments in this "'Urban Medium-Density Residential" area, accam-
pani�d by appropriate zone changes where necessary and favorab�.e. +
The recreational part of the proposed development will have
neutral to negative impact upon the flood-plain Gharacteristics
and per.formance. The br_ic��e will be d�signed so that it will
fl�at free and swing clear of the main current on an anchor lirie
at flood st�ges.
Any davel.opment in a resid�ntial area will increase traf�ic
flows ir� most categUries of public and private transportation.
A gain, �uch inc.reases are inevitable in areas such as th�s,
�.lrea�ly designa��d for fairly intensive popula�ian densi�ty.
The pr.oposal requests approval of the �ollowing variances :
1. Princi al access b �
p y private street, �0 �'�et right-of-way�
with 2�1• feet pavement wic�,th� conven.tionally curbed.
ti
�, �. Lo�s platted to c�n�erline of private stre�t and�or �
driveways, as the ca�e may be.
We are pleased to present the above informatic�n and stand
read� to provide supplemental data upon reque�t. We request your �
favorabl2 c�nsideration. ;
Very truly yours, �'
,
O .C . K j el.gaard�Owner and D�veloper �?
(��(����'����J �;..��r `;
' W.S! S�y, P.E.
Engineer nd Planner
a�
}t
FI
��� �`i�UF�`��, `
.� �;
�G��w,�C,1N�� ,�'17 �
� � � �
N
�
REGON
t
,�i- �.j �g v (�
� /�� qY �' ,L� ��` :,.
��O 5'/��T�\�CJ'� S�
ti
fj
r�
la
,
i
�:
�
. �. . �
� APPENDIX A
Sheet S KJE?�AARD PLANNED DEVEI,OPMENT
� "Sigard, Oregon I
� SUBDIVISION STA�EMENT
Loca�Cionr 1377�-13840 S.W. Hall
(S.W. Highway 217)
Tigard, Oregon
Le ale Lot 3 of Edgewood Subdivisi.on
S�W. Graham DLC #39, Section 12,
T2Si R1W, W.Me in Washington County,
Oregon
En�ineer-SurveVQr axid P1anr�er
KLETN & STI7CKEY� EN�INEERS & PI�4INNERS
211 East First Stree't
� Newberg, Oregon 9'�132
�
� '
,� �
I� ......... ._.�..� .. . _ _
s N
1 , �• �.
APPEIVDZX A '
ANAZYSIS OF SUBDIVISION
Area: �..�� Ac.
Zonea R�7 (requestirig zone change to A-2)
Planned Land Uses
Urban medium density residential
(Tigard Comprehensive Plan)
No. of Lotsa 10 Multi-Family lots
No. o�' Dwellings i
4�3 new apartments, approximatel.y 13
2-bedroom and ,�0 3-bedraom, plus 1
exis�ing dupl�x and 1 exi�ting ��-F A..�..
Densitya ;10 .60 D/i�L per gross acre including
` � 3 existing (Comprehensiv�e Plan permits
12 D.�. pex� grass acre man) .
Population: A�pr.ox. 2.8j persoms per new unit
_ ].23 persons additianal
Population Density�
i
30.z1 persc�ns/acre including
existing units.
�ecreatiunal Area:
0.70 Ac.
Common Areas 0.�3 Ac.
Private Roacla 390 lin. f�t. x 40 R.O.W. (2��' pavecl
width)
�'ra.vate Driveway e
Approx. 1�50 lin. ft. of 12' paved
drivEways (1-way)
Prepared bya Wynf'ord Saxton Stuckey, P.Eo
�
� _ _ _'