Planning Commission Packet - 12/18/1973 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
` ~ - AMmOmMMEM
•
. '
- - ~_-_^-_--_ ' _�'- ~.^_'�-^ ~-���~ .
.
V \ /
~~ \°
' . |
� . .
AGENDA
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting - December 18, 1973
Twality Junior High School - lecture Room
' .
14650 S.W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
PUBLIC HEARING - 7:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3°1 Regular Meeting of November 6, I973
3. 2 Regular Meeting of November 20, 1973
3. 3 Study Session of November 27, I973
4. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE
4~1 Zone Change ZC 6-73 /Mayernih\ {
A request by Michael & Lucy Mayernik to change
existing parcels from R-7, Single Family and-C-2°
General Commerical zoning designations to a C-3,
General Commercial zone. Applicant proposes to
construct a restaurant on the site located on
the northeast quadrant of the S.W. Pacific Highway
� . and S.W. 69th intersection. The site comprises
\
1.01 acres. (Tax Map 151 36AD, Tax Lot 400\
Staff Findings
Testimony and Cross Examination
Staff Recommendation
Commission Discussion and Action
5. PUBLIC HEARING - TEMPORARY USE
5. 1 Temporary Use CU 17-73 (Weed Control Service)
A request by Weed Control Service, Inc. , to allow
Mark 50 Machinery, Inc. to place a mobil office
structure on a site located at 11564 S.W. Pacific
Highway. Request is for a two year temporary use
approval (Tax Map lSl 3,6DAw Tax Lots 90I .& 1000)
��- _ _ �� �� _ �. ' '^ �--^'��--~`^' ~� -'�- �- � ��`�-`` � - ~-- ^ ��~�� " /x+r °��+"
-°~-_' ` — - _
^
'� �/ ' ' �^ /` ` ' � � - '� ^ `
` ' ` `� � ' ` ` � ' , ` ' /
`�� ' � ' ' ` ` ' ]
'
` � � '
.
`
° '' /
�
\~' \,
^
Staff Findings
e,� Testimony and Cross Examination V.. Staff Reoommendtion
Commission Discussion and Action
6. PUBLIC HEARING _ CONDITIONAL USE
6. 1 Conditional Use CU I8-73 (Mobil Oil Corp. )
A request by Mobil Oil Corp. for approval to
conduct a service station use in a C-5, General
Commercial zone. Subject site is located at
•
I1900 S.W. Pacific Highway and comprises . 21
acres. (Tax Map 2S1 -2AA, Tax Lot 101)
ir
Staff Findings
�' Testimony and Cross Examination
Staff Reco0mendtion
Commission Discussion and Action
7. PUBLIC HEARING - SUBDIVISION & ZONING ORDINANCE REVISIONS ` v.
7"l Proposed ordinances amending Title 18 with resoect to
procedures for hearings on land use applicatiOns and
permits on zoning, partitioning and subdivision of
lands and determination of contested cases arising %
under Titles 17 and 18, Tigard Municipal Code, a
��.
�.� N
7° 2 Proposed ordinance amending and supplementing Title 17 ,
Tigard Municipal Code, with respect to subdivision and
partitioning of lands in accordance with Chapter 696,
�
Oregon Laws of 1973° and further amending Title 17 '
• with respect to procedures and requirements for
variances, subdividing and partitioning of land and
prescribing fees.
7. 3 Proposed ordinance amending Section 2" 08. 71' Tigard
Municipal Code, with respect to the conduct of
•
hearings by the hearing officer.
7. 4 Proposed ordinance repealing subsection (2) of
Section 18°20~ 020, Tigard Municipal Code, thereby
deleting planned residential development as a
' conditional use in R-7, R-18 and R-30 zones, and
amending Section I8° 56.030 with respect to procedures
and requirements for Planned Development District zone.
8. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
'^
8°1 Taco Bell
WITHDRAWN Location: 1 1630 S.W. Pacific Highway
Staff Findings '
Staff Recommendation
Commission Discussion and Action
Page 2 - PC Agenda l -l8-73
L
( (
\ l'
4 1
8 . 2 Ted Nelson Co. ,
Location: 14280 S.W. 72nd Ave.
Staff Findings
Staff Recommendtion
Commission Discussion and Action
9. MISCELLANEOUS ..,
f
I
9 .1 Summerfield - Golfcourse Maintenance Building & C
Restrooms; consideration of site development ,
plan. i
1
Location: Directly east of the current terminus of
S. W. Summerfield Drive at S. W. 98th Ave. ;
Adjacent the 3rd tee. • f
1,]
f 1
4
Staff Findings "
Staff Recommendation
Commission Discussion and Action L
9 . 2 Consideration of a request by Calvin United Presbyterian 1,4
(— Church for a directional sign. ,
4'
rl
ri.
Location: S.W. Canterbury Lane at S.W. Pacific 4
Highway. r
4
Staff Find ings
Staff Recommendation
Commission Discussion and Action
. 9 ..3 Interpretation of Use; A request by Harley-Davidson
of Portland to consider retail sales of motorcycles 14'
and accessories a "sporting good" use in a C-3, 1
General Commercial zone. i
t
Staff Findings
I
Staff Recommendation I
Commission Discussion and Action
9 , 4 Discussion of a request by the Murray-McCormick ,4
Environmental Group to consider "major appliance 1
and furniture assembly, warehousing and retail
sales where the majority of space utilization is for
warehousing and assembly" as a conditional use in an t`4'
1,1
M-4, Industrial Park zone.
( Staff Findings
Staff Recommendation
Commission Discussion and Action
Page 3 - PC Agenda - 12-18-73
_ ,
■ .4` . C /? \ .
(,,,? < � 1 0. OTHER. BUSINESS
\ « \ . 12. ADJOURNMENT
•
1
(
' ` \
(
3
(
1,11
\
(
(
\
[
\
/
\ i
� § 4
»
\ / 1
3
/
'
' .
. . . . . j
. � . . . . � �. . :. . . . . . .. . . .
`�-
At MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
December 18, 1973
Twality Jr. High School lecture room
Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
A. Present: L8WiS, Hartman, Nicoli, Frazier, Sakata,
Mickelson, Chairman Whittaker; Planning
Director, Wink Brooks; Associate Planner,
Richard Bolen; City Attorney, Fred Anderson
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. The minutes for the meetings of November 6, 20,
and 27 1973 were approved as submitted by unanimous
[ ~~ vote of the Commission present.
4. PUBLIC HEARING - Zone Change
4.1 Zone Change ZC 6-73 (Mayernik)
A request by Michael & Lucy Mayernik to change
existing parcels from R-7, Single Family and C-2,
General Commercial zoning designations to a C-3,
General Commercial zone. Applicant proposes to
construct a restaurant on the site located on
the northeast quadrant of the S.W. Pacific Highway
and S.U. 69th intersection. The site comprises
1. 01 acres. (Tax Map 151 36AD, Tax Lot 4300)
A. This item was withdrawn from consideration by
the applicant to allow more time to prepare
adequate submission information.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - TEMPORARY USE
6.1 Temporary Use CU 17-73 (Weed Control Service)
A request by Weed Control Soroicev Inc. , to allow
Mark 50 Machinery, Inc. to place biI office
structure on a site located at 11564 S.W. Pacific
Highway. Request iS for a two year temporary use ' /
�-�
approval (Tax Map lSl 38OA, TaX Lots 901 & 1000)
\ ` `
. `
`
__
0| �_
| '
- /
A. Staff Findings
� \^'
1. Brooks presented the staff findings which � ^
included a discussion of the five conditions
listed in the zoning ordinanoe, these five
conditions testing the validity of the
temporar use request. In light of the
r` ' rement that one of these conditions be '
met, Brooks stated the staff opinion that the '^
applicant had not submitted information that
-. ,�
would enable the Planning Commission to find
the request in compliance with one of the
conditions. `
. .
B. Testimony and Cross Examination
1. Proponents
a° Clayton Herring of Norris, Biggs and Simpson
spoke for the applicant, Weed Control Service ' |
Company. He stated that the applicant has
a two year non-renewable lease with option
to buy. In that the temporary use of the
mobil office structure is requested for
a two year period, this lease arrangement guar-
antees to the City that there will not be a
\`
need for the mobil office beyond this time.
At the end of the two year period Mark 50
Machinery will either move to a new location or
choose to exercise their option and buy the
entire facility which would include the present
Weed Control offices; no longer necessitating
the need for mobil offices. A copy of the
aforementioned lease agreement was not sub-
mitted in evidence.
b. Francis Smith, Attorney for Weed Control
Service, stated his disagreement with the
staff finding that the temporary use application
the five diti in the iordinance.
Mr. Francis Smith stated the request met con-
dition four hi h referred to the temporary
nature of the requested use and also condition
number five which states that the requested
use must be incident to the continued| use of '
is committed. In addition, he stated that the
owner of Weed Control Service plans on retiring
within two years and expansion
room - be
*r�
provided at this time for Mark 50 nac''i /ewy .
Page 12-18-73
c. Lewis questioned Mr. Lawrence of Mark 50
Machinery as to the nature of their business.
e Mr. Lawrence stated that his company man-
ufactures machinery for the timber industry.
d. Brooks showed slides of the present Mark
50 site at the Aurora Air Park. These
slides showed considerable machinery stored
outside, but Mr. Lawrence stated that most
of this material would not be transfered to
the Tigard location and that adequate inside
storage room will be available in Tigard.
2. Opponents
a. No one appeared in opposition to the request.
C. Staff Recommendation
1. Brooks stated that in light of the ordinance
requirements that the applicant prove one of the
five conditions exist before a temporary use can
be granted, that testimony by the proponents '
provided a possible justification for the temporary
use as provided in conditions 4 and 5 of the zoning
code. However, rather than offering a recommenda-
tion pro or con, he left it to the discretion of
C. the Planning Commission to decide if the ordinance
requirements had been properly filled.
D. Commission Discussion and Action
1. Lewis stated that he found the request in
compliance with four and five of the conditions
required to exist and also stated that it was
his feeling that Mark 50 Machinery would improve
the site over the existing use. Lewis then
moved to approve the temporary use request for a
two year period based upon the finding that
conditions four and five have been fulfilled.
Nicoli seconded.
2. Hartman stated that in his judgement the request
meets the spirit of the law if not the letter of
the law and stated his agreement with Lewis' s
motion and the fact that the Community would be
benefited by improvement of existing site conditions.' ;
Page 3- 12-18-73 - PC Minutes
.. .`
3. Mickelson asked if there were any guarantees
that the trailer would be removed in two I
years. ■
4. Lewis amended his motion to read that in two
years the owner of the property will remove the
trailer. This two year period to begin 3
January 31, 1974. The motion passed by unanimous
vote of the Commission present.
6. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE
6.1 Conditional Use CU 18-73 (Mobil Oil Corp.
A request by Mobil Oil Corp. for approval to
conduct a service station use in a C-3, General s■
Commercial zone. Subject site is located at 1
11900 S.W. Pacific Highway and comprises .21 acres
(Tax Map 231 2AA, Tax Lot 101)
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks presented the staff findings.
■
i',
B. Testimony and Cross Examination 1,
i'
t;,
1. Proponent 1
a. Mr. Eckels of Mobil Oil Corporation fl
spoke for the applicant and Mrs. Hoffarber !',
the property owner. i'e spoke of the need
to remodel this facility based upon the
quantity of business now being produced.
Cross Examination of Proponents
a. Mickelson questioned Mr. Eckels about the
staff finding which referred to the present
parking of tow trucks within the sidewalks ii
area. Mr. Eckels said that space is a limit t
ing factor on this site and that parking will
always be a problem. In terms of the parking
of tow trucks, Mobil Oil has no authority of
the leasee in this matter. He stated that
this is a matter between the leasee and the
City of Tigard.
2. Opponents
a. Speaking in opposition to the conditional
use request was Eugene Dooley, operator of
the existing Mobil Station. He stated that
Mobil' s facility will not provide him with
adequate mechanic or office space and he
part of
would therefore be forced to restrict p
( his business and therefore service to the
Tigard Community. The Mobil Oil proposal
Page 4 - 12-18-73 - PC Minutes
(n
•M1
would eliminate his station being a complete t:
service station business.
C. Staff Recommendation �z
1. Brooks recommended approval of the applicants
request with the provision of three conditions :
D. Commission Discussion and Action
1. Sakata announced her abstention based upon the
Fasano requirements disallowing prehearing
contacts.
2. Planning Commission Discussion centered around
two areas. 1
( ) The problems resulting from over-
crowding on the existing site. (2) the services
to the citizens of Tigard which would be lost y3
if the proposed Mobil plan were developed
(Services to be lost were based upon the test-
imony of operator Mr. Dooley. )
3. Hartman moved that the request be approved based
upon staff findings and subject to the staff
recommended conditions. The staff recommended
conditions:
a. No tow truck, vehicle or other physical
obstruction shall be allowed to obstruct the
area included within the public right-of-way,
nor shall said obstruction impair a motorist' s
view across the subject site in a 40 foot
arc measured from the site' s property corner %1
located at the intersection of S.W. Pacific
Highway and S.W. Hall Boulevard.
b. The applicant shall comply with all provisions
of Chapter 18. 64 (Tigard Municipal Code) and
reflect on his site development plan a vehicular
circulation plan that maximizes public safety.. '
The Planning Commission shall review the site
development plan as an addition tothe normal
site development standards in relation to public
safety and make a finding that the site devel-
opment does maximize public safety.
Page 5 - 12-18-73 - PC Minutes •
Mt
c. The applicant shall construct 8 foot wide
concrete sidewalks to facilitate pedestrian
A~� movement along the public ways adjacent the
"~*
subject site. Said sidewalks shall be con-
structed to City of Tigard standards.
4° Frazier seconded and the motion passed by a
majority vote with Lewis voting no and Sakata
-
abstaining.
7. PUBLIC HEARING - SUBDIVISION & ZONING ORDINANCE REVISIONS
7.1 Proposed ordinances amending Title 18 with respect to
procedures for heatings on land use applications and
permits on zoning, partitioning and subdivision of
lands and determination of contested cases arising
under Titles 17 and 18* Tigard Municipal Code.
7.2 Proposed ordinance amending and supplementing Title 17,
Tigard Municipal Code' with respect to subdivision and
portitipning of lands in accordance with Chapter 696,
Oregon Laws of 1973, and further amending Title 17
with respect to procedures and requirements for
variances, subdividing and partitioning of land and
prescribing fees.
�- 7. 3 Proposed ordinance amending Section 2°08° 7I/ Tigard
�
! --
Municipal Code, with respect to the conduct of
hearings by the hearing officer.
| '
7. 4 Proposed ordinance repealing subsection (2) of
Section I8^ 20°020, Tigard Municipal Code, thereby
deleting planned residential development as a
conditional use in R-7, R-l5 and R-3O zones, and
amending Section I8° 56" 030 with respect to procedures
and requirements for Planned Development District zone. \
aa
A. Commission Discussion and Action
l° Brooks said that no formal staff report had been
prepared. That he thought the previous study session ,
had provided an adequate basis to discuss the pro-
posed `
reviaiona.
2. Lewis stated his disagreement with Section 17.48°'
stating that this put an undue burden upon the
�
developer of a planned development requiring him
to state all variances from the existing code.
/~ '
Page 6 - 12-I8-73 - PC Minutes
^ ' '
AMMIIMMEM
3. Mr. Anderson replied, stating he found this
provision justified in order to make clear the
deviations from the Subdivision Ordinance. He
stated, that in some previous planned developments,
variances have been included as part of the approval •
but not fully realized by the Commission.
4. Barkhurst objected to section 2c of item 7.4
which requires ) the applicant to meet with the
Planning Commission in order to judge the
adequacy of his submission. Barkhurst stated
his opinion that this would provide an unnecessary
additional step for the developer. Hartman moved
to recommend approval of the ordinance amendments
to the City Council. Nickelson Seconded. The
vote was unanimous for approval. !'
8. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
8. 1 Taco Bell
Location: 11630 S.W. Pacific Highway
A. The site plan was withdrawn by the applicant.
8. 2 Ted Nelson
Location: 14280 S.W. 72nd Ave.
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks presented the staff findings •
B. Staff Recommendation
1. Staff recommended approval of the site and
landscaping plan as submitted by the applicant
subject to the following conditions
a. The applicant submit for staff approval,
revised plans reflecting 30 foot maximum
width driveways adjacent S.W. 72nd Avenue.
The areas not then being used for driveways
shall be landscaped in a manner identical to
that landscape character currently shown on
the applicant' s submitted landscape plan.
The irrigation system to be revised accordingly. .
Page 7 - 12-18-73 - PC Minutes
•
1
C. Commission Discussion and Action
1. Chairman Whittaker asked the proponent to
present his proposed plan. Mr. Rose presented
the plan for the applicant, asking that a drive-
way width be allowed adequate for trucks servicing
the property; that a 7 foot hard surface paved
strip be allowed on the north side of the building;
that the trees not be required along the easterly
property line in that a site obscuring fence will
be constructed; that 4 of the six trees shown in
the perking area on the southern portion of the
property may not be requireo because this is a
future building site.
2. Hartman moved to table the plan until the Planning
Commission and staff had time to study the new
proposals being made by Mr. Rose' . Sakata seconded.
3. Mr. Nelson of Ted Nelson Co. asked that the plan
not be tabled in that their production schedules
require the building to be in use by March and
that he would agree to working out specific issues
with the Planning Commission,
3. Hartman withdrew his motion in response to Mr.
Nelson ' s request. Hartman then moved to approve
the submitted site plan including the staff
recommended condition but deleting the trees
along the easterly property line where the site
obscuring fence will be located in addition he
specified that the driveway width would be approved
by the Planning Director and the paving of the
parking areas would be approved by the public
works dept.
4. The motion was put to a vote and passed unanimously
with Whittaker abstaining.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
10. 1 Consideratio n . of a request by Calvin United Presbyterian
Church for a directional sign.
Location: S.W. Canterbury Lane at S.W. Pacific Hwy.
A. Brooks presented the staff findings, and recommended
the following:
Page 8 - 12-18-73 - PC Minutes
- , -
`
^ ^�, �_ �
�/� � ` '
. �~ �~ ^ �
^ `
` .
"Approval of a directional sign for one year, said ` 1
�r sign to be placed on and above the standard street
identification=~ sign in the the t quadrant of the
Canter-
bury Lane, and furthermore that the planning staff be
directed to draft a revision Lo the Sigh Code, so as
by the City utilizing the standard street sign
and conveying the sign cost to the applicant. " L
IT
B. Commission Discussion
_ Barkhurst said that the question
signs for h h has before the Planning
Commission previously d it was decided that
churches would not be among the uses allowed
a directional sign. Therefore, based upon passed
Planning Commission action he t d that it
would be e it ol for the Planning Commission
to approve this t
2. Frazier t t o that the sign was actually for the
Loaves and Fishes Program Lhich provides a community
service to retired citizens and thereby justified
a directional sign.
(-
3. Lewis moved o approve the dire
according to the staff recommendation, Sakata
seconded and the motion passed by a majority vote
with Barkhurst voting no and Hartman abstaining.
10, 2 Interpretation of Use: A request by Harley-Davidson
of Portland to consider retail sales of motorcycles
and accessories a "sporting good" use in a C-3, General
Commercial zone.
1. Staff findings and raooMmendatlona
A. Brooks presented the staff findl / g and the .
following recommendation:
Interpretation of the proposed motorcycle sales .
facility as related to the sale of motor vehicles
and thus a conditional use in a C-3, General .
Commercial zone. '
t.
2° Commission Discussion and Action
A. Lewis stated that he saw several problems `
with the location of a motor cycle shop hioh t,
should require a conditional use consideration. '
These included the residence on the rear of the . 1
property and the means of access to the site from . @
�^
Warner Avenue. '
,
Page 9 - 17-18-73 - PC Minutes - "� ! �` ���
-------
B. Mickelson moved to interpret the requested
motorcycle sales store as a conditional
use. Hartman seconded and the vote was
unanimous.
10. 3 Discussion of a request by the Murray-McCormick
Environmental Group to consider "major appliance
and furniture assembly, warehousing and retail
sales where the majority of space utilization is
for warehousing and assembly" as a conditional
use in an M-4, Industrial Park zone.
1. Staff Findings
A. Brooks presented the staff findings and
informed the Planning Commission that this was
a matter of discussion at this time and that
no staff recommendation was prepared.
2. Commission Discussion and Action
A. The Commissioners, after discussing the
request, agreed that a major aspect of a
furniture business is storage or warehousing
of merchandise. A basis was therefore recognized
for considering a furniture store as a condition-
al use in an 0-4, Industrial Park zone in that
warehousing is presently a conditional use in
this zone.
B. Hartman moved to instruct the staff to draw
up an ordinance amendment to include a
furniture store as a conditional use in
an M-4 zone. Barkhust seconded and the motion
passed by unanimous vote.
10.4 Vacation of S.W. 69th south of Hampton
1. Staff Findings and Recommendation
A. Brooks presented the staff findings and
recommendation for approval.
2. Commission Discussion and Action
A. Hartman moved to recommend approval of
the dedication request to the City Council.
Sakata seconded and the motion passed by
unanimous vote.
ADJOURNMENT: 11:02 P.M.
(1
Page 10 - 12-18-73 - PC Minutes
4111111MMIIIIMI
•
LO1/4.;.PAC-.)
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
December 18, 1973
Agenda Item 4.1
ZC 6-73 (Mayernik)
Zone Change
For property located on the northeast intersection
quadrant of S.W. Pacific Highway and S.W. 69th Avenue
(Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 4300)
Applicant
Michael & Lucy Mayernik
Applicant' s Request
Approval of a change of zone classification from R-7,
Single Family Resdiential and C-2, General Commercial
to C-3, General Commercial
Applicant° s Proposal
To construct a restaurant on the subject site.
Staff Findings
1. The site is currently developed with two single
family dwellings and a garage
2. Existing adjacent land use and zoning described as
follows:
easterly direction - Texaco Service Station; zoned
C-2, General Commercial
southerly direction - proposed 8 story motor -hotel
and office complex; zoned C-3,
general commercial
westerly direction - single family residences, and
apartments; zoned C-2, General
Commercial; A-2, (Multi-family
Residential; R-7, Single Family
Residential
northerly direction - single family residences; zoned
R-7, Single Family Residential
•
,
3. The subject site was recently annexed to the City of
Tigard and retains Washington County zoning designations,
C-2, General Commercial and R-7, Single Family Residential.
4. The Tigard Community Plan designates the subject site '
as General Commercial, said Plan stating General Commercial
"areas accomodate a range of retail and service commercial '
uses that benefit from a highway-oriented location.
The development of individual properties in those areas
should take into account the traffic safety and visual
problems associated with "strip commercial development".
The present pattern of development along Highway 99W
is not desireable. It is dangerous, inefficient, confusing
and 'unsightly. " [
"The plan indicates definite limits to the present strip
pattern in order to minimize the impact of existing
conditions® Future development along Highway 99-W
will be carefully reviewed in accordance with standards
in the plan and in applicable zoning regulations". . .
The Tigard Community Plan defines the Objectives,
Policies and Standards of the General Commercial land
use category as follows: €'
1
Objectives
° To provide accessible locations, visible from
major streets, for uses that depend on highway
traffic.
o To minimize the inherent conflict between the safe,
rapid movement of through traffic and shopper traffic
on major streets.
Policies & Standards
o Along Highway 99-W limit further "strip commercial
development" as presently characterized by a
disorganized pattern of unrelated business uses.
° Permit additional business uses that seek highway
locations to develop sites oriented to adjacent
access streets.
o Establish high design standards for signing and
appearance including the landscaping of setback
areas and the designation of access points.
C
Page 2 - PC staff report - 1_2-18-73
•
„
, .. , .
o Encourage uniformity in the landscape treatment of
land bordering the higheay, with particular attention
(I to the scale (mass) of plantings in order to establish
a sense of continuity along the roadside.
,
o Development will coincide with the provision of public
streets, water and sewerage facilities. These facilities
shall be (a) capable of adequately serving all intervening
properties as well as the proposed development and
(b) designed to meet city or county standards.
5. Applicant' s response to the "Fasano” related submission
requirements are attached.
6, The applicant's proposal is in conformance with the Tigard
Community Plan designation, "General Commercial", however, I
the applicant' s proposal does not adequately address 1
the question of traffic safety as stated in the Plan [
text. The site has direct access from Pacific Highway
and S. W. 69th Avenue. A left turn into the site will
1,
be required by northbound traffic. It should be noted k
0
that an eight story motor hotel and office complex has
been proposed directly across Pacific Highway from the k
subject site. This intense development will cause 1
greater traffic congestion at the Pacific Highway and 2,
r
69th Avenue intersection. It is anticipated that a 1,1
traffic signal and other intersection improvements will
iLe be necessary to control the flow of traffic at this
intersection. .
i
P
7. The applicant has not, in the staff's opinion, substantiated
community need for the proeos: . restaurant use. (See
applicant' s submission) . 14044410:staurants exist in
the immediate area and are i.en,ified as follows
Denney's -- general purpose national chain restaurant
serving breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Key West -- restaurant and lounge specializing in
lunches and dinners.
1 Todd' s -- smorgasbord style restaurant, serving dinner.
1 ,
k
Hi-Hat -- oriental style restaurant, serving lunches 1
and dinners.
Eve' s -- buffet style restaurant, serving breakfast,
i
lunch and dinner. i
Mr. Steak -- semi-buffet style serving lunch and dinner.
IL
Page 3 - PC staff report - 12-18-73
The proposed user of the subject site is the International
King's Table restaurant, a smorgasbord type restaurant
4, serving lunch and dinner.
8. There have been changes in condition that would justify
a change in zone. The applicant has substantiated these
changes.
9. The applicant has not proven why the subject site is
more suitable than other sites in Tigard zoned for the
same purpose. Specifically, the applicant's submission
leaves unclear whether other sites were considered for
the proposed use.
10. The proposed zone change and development is adjacent
existing residential uses on both the west and north,
portions of the site. The proposed use could have a
detrimental effect on these uses if not properly
designed. Increased traffic noise and lights emanating
from parking lots, blowing debris and odors are all
potential detrimental effects to the adjacent residential
neighborhood. In addition, potential grading of the
site to the level of Pacific Highway would adversely
affect the traffic noise levels in the adjacent
residential neighborhoods. The existing embankment
adjacent Pacific Highway shields the residential
neighborhoods from traffic noise generated by Pacific
Highway traffic and its removal would create increased
neighborhood noise levels. The applicant states that
landscaping and screening would be sufficient to
alleviate conflicts between the proposed commercial use
and existing residential use. The staff contends that
landscaping and screening is not sufficient protection 1
against noise and that adverse impacts exist that are 1
not considered by the applicant. Consequently, the
staff finds the applicant has not described all the
adverse effects the subject proposal will have on
adjacent neighborhoods nor has the applicant proven
1
that said effects can be alleviated.
11. The site is served by water, sewer and utility services
necessary for development. Water is provided via a Metzger
Water District 6 line located in S. W. 69th Avenue. A
Unified Sewerage Agency sewer line is located adjacent
the subject property in S. W. 69th Avenue.
There is currently a moratorium on sewer connections in
effect until such time as the Unified Sewerage Agency's
Durham Sewerage Treatment Plant is operational. Some 1
commercial sewer permits remain available, however, they
4: may be completely utilized when the applicant is prepared
to apply for a building permit. The subject moratorium
0
Page 4 - PC staff report - 12-18-73
is temporary. Public funds have been committed to
construct the Durham Plant and said facility is to be
completed within two years 9 thus allowing the applicant's
proposal to be constructed within a reasonable period of
time.
12. S. U. 69th Avenue has not been constructed to City
street improvement standards.
13. Storm drainage from any proposed parking lot should
be designed to route drainage water away from residential
areas where water would run through yards or other
residential property. Storm drainage from the subject
site should not place a burden on adjacent properties.
14. Existing structures on the site are proposed to be
removed prior to the construction of the subject
restaurant.
Staff Recommendation
In as much as the applicant has not submitted information
necessary to prove substantial conformance with the "Fasano"
C. requirements and in as much as the staff requires additional
time to review any testimony or additional exhibits sub-
mitted during the December 189 1973 public hearing 9 the
staff recommends recessing the public hearing until the
next regularly scheduled Planning Commission hearing on
January 159 l973.
Page 5 - PC staff report - 12-18-73
•
wt 5 y k lr
a t' rJ rxg { '''','.44,ite s t d5 ° . J ',; JP k)'-..c.,N
1' t ) t xT, ' tS 1S 'i`*i I t■t .4q,.." r�e 3f
' )7
�' tr t {� J'� a r 5 't�iG sE 7 } r !'r�r ar t. -4 ,t r�. � d -a4i�,� �+
,T � CK q �r I "a��t { � • /< j
S„. "4 1 fltl k#
• , i.'`..-'•:0,.,., .t-,,:fs.:„,::„.,,:.,•,,,,-:' . :.1 5 } J 44 1,. h1l h}
3%iI A1S} Jy.
ti t iY.. 5+.> )
4 � wy ti 4+ t��;i t F
' Sp .b' eft 1,,3`. + y -
ytd
g.A �4a n'xa a<:'1,1 fir':
41, , r 3. General. a ',# ,
` � •' The requested zoning � relates to Tax Lot ma k''S,,ti
` ;, • 4300 (See the snap attached here(,� X ixh bit. 1 and by this ; "`.
(
s' J 4 reference made a part hereof). The subject property fronts en
x
the North side of Pacific Nigh py (*tghway 99W) and is bow `
s %
cm- the West by S.W. 69th Avenue. Tax Lot No. 4300 is approxiMate y ° ;r�.
w 44,650 square feet, slightly oiler cue (1) acre. The Northerly '1-,4,
rte ,. Y '+ x,t
"':.:, ',40'..'..4:,P-.....4 •
portion of Tax Lot No. 4300 (Portion A of Exhibit 1 and hereiaatbsr ` ) r,„
{ , ,,,,: referred to as 'Portion A') is currently zoned R-7 (Washington
1 x�
County Sone Designation) The rOneinder of Tax Lot No. 4300 r
' ;•1, (Portion B of Exhibit 1 and hereinafter referred to as "Portion rat`
,-r )
111s) is currently zoned C-2 (Washington. County Zone Designation • yj
) Yy 1 F + Jai
General Commercial) . �..•!
r,,
F
.:4,-,'•:.-„,.',.:...,.-i'...t s . 3(a) . Specific Purpose of the J o d zoning Action. ',�
yr a4SKfy.R;. )
"`h' The zoning action req ested is twofold s
,' ' (1) Change the seer designation of Portion
a§
a:
A to C-31 and if'
' < (2) Change the solme designation of Portion, '
BtoC�u3.
g, x,i14
�,t (1) The requested $oni�q action relative to Poetigo ��
f ,# <; . A is to change the land �s fitted eh the property fr'4s►
J
}J•`;', Residential to General Co ■eereia. The. purpose of' this requested ,I
• �.$�' '" • change is to bring the permitted ;ias�8. uses of Portion A i
1 M 'r. ,r•v 7?,,,. y ,,
. ,
'''„7-„„....,,!''Zil,.• .:4M,a,'„WZOTE,V.177;',,,',."'4=4:4■40444.,,far
J''''''''' ' ' . ' ' .' '.'' 's.+ '&'L'I',Y'74tW,ri;;:t,■;:;',,,,.',:i.:1,;440.t3i0,1'.','-'5,,--,,,:4C'?,"S'',„.:WA:'''fk,.ii:''t.''':',?;.1,r"''''''''C,is4):'''....'-',;',,?: ''''' • ':, '.'''';',', ''''- '''',1'.=;',"'::..'.' ' ',_,..)
•'''''''...'. 111., ,'• r_..*ii,, ., ;, „ _ . • ._ , '' . '' ' ' ' !"'..' ,,i,''''-.'S.i,'',.h1-‘1„
',: A...;,r,..4-,...''-'-. : : . '.•.'.,. ',.,J-7,40',' 11- `,
• ,.. ' .' ' .
'.12'..4 .tji. . ' '''. ;;',''',:•`'''.-1 '" ',s''„4T, '
'..i)...'-1.1,
' . •- ,.. • ,,„
'fl';'''':4&''',' • ,
;:t,'; — '.' • 'i...,;.,.''.+,.,,,
• ' '''''F,,,',P;S;',,.
-4:
FASANO REQUIREMENTS -4,4--•
1.4 11111••■■•■•• '':".A
..,:... .
3. General.3
! ,.v..
,,,p .- • „ ,11
,.,..4.,_.',. The requested zoning action relates to Tax Lot No.
4300 (See the map attached hereto netted Exhibit 1 and by this
, -
',.4,4 reference made a part hereof) . The subject property fronts on .. ,.
=•./p
; ■ .''''
,,,..'• .,
the .....,
e North side of Pacific Highway (Highway 99W) and is bounded
..,...
:A.
on the West by S.W. 69th Avenue. Tax Lot No. 4300 is approximately
........
...
e , 44,650 square feet, slightly over one (1) acre. The Northerly
portion of Tax Lot No. 4300 (Portion A of Exhibit 1 and hereinafter
..,.
. referred to as "Portion A”) is currently zoned R-7 (Washington
County Zone Designation) . The remainder of Tax Lot No. 4300
.,
4-- - : (Portion B of Exhibit 1 and hereinafter referred to as ' portion
et,
B") is currently zoned C-2 (Washington County Zone Designation -
.i,..,
..,
General Cominercial) .
If .
,- -'
3(a) . Specific Pur 2112L1 ?4poth sod Zoning Action.
, :•p•
r-,-.•4,
The zoning action requested is twofold:
(1) Change the zone designation of Portion
A to C-3; and
',.. (2) Change the zone designation of Portion
. . ,
4-4,.;,- • B to C-3.
. .
(1) The requested zoning action relative to Portion
. _
,.i.'.. A is to change the land uses permitted on the property from
-,-,
-.;...,
,., • Residential to General Commercial. The purpdee of this requested
.', .
-... ( ' change is to bring the permitted landed uses of Portion A
..6: , .
. . . .
.4i.'
Page 1. ' . • • . . . ' ,. H. i
,'.''•-... .. . .
. ,
.4.. . . . .
The population of the area surrounding the City of
Tigard as well as the City of Tigard itself has experienced a
substantial increase. The daily traffic count on Pacific
Highway has inc reased from approximately 11,700 vehicles per
day in 1960 to approximately 31,000 vehicles per day in 1973.
The bulk of this increase has occurred in the past several years.
The vehicles utilizing Pacific Highway was, approximately 26,000
per day in 1971. To facilitate the increased use of Pacific
Highway, a fifth lane has been added recently.
The land use of the area in the general vicinity of the
subject property has changed dramatically in the past ten years.
Both the North and South sides of Pacific Highway have been ex-
( tensively developed. In fact, the subject property is the only
piece of property on the North side of Pacific Highway that is
undeveloped. These developments have all been either retail
outlets or service oriented business.
1
The subject property is within the Metzger Water District.
The subject property is currently being serviced by the Metzger
Water District. Any additional services which would be required
are available.
Sewerage service in the area is provided by the Unified
Sewerage Agency (herein "USA") . At the present time, the subject
property has two discharge connections.. Additional discharge
units are questionable at this time, but will be available within
six months.
Page 3
.41•MINININ
•
° a
A major consideration justifying the requested zone
changes for Portion A relates to the location and configuration
of that parcel. Portion A is rectangular shaped, having dimensions
of 85 feet by 190 feet. The 85 foot boundary fronts the East
side of S.W. 69th Avenue, This is the only means of ingress and
{ egress for this piece of property. Because of the configuration
of the lot, combined with its location, it is not
possible to
utilize it for the permitted land uses. It is not suitable for
residential purposes.
3 (e) . Suitable Use of Property
The proposed use of the property is an International
CKings Table restaurant.
• The subject property is located between Interstate
Highway 5 (I-5) and Highway 217. These two highways service the
major population centers in the surrounding area. The ingress I,
and egress from and to these highways is quick and safe. As such,
the area lying between I-5 and Highway 217 is ideally located for
service oriented businesses. In this area, the subject property
is the only suitable property which is available.
The subject property has excellent visibility. It is
elevated, which allows it to be seen easily from Pacific Highway.
Furthermore, patrons of the restaurant would have an excellent
view of the surrounding area because of the height of the property.
The access to the subject property is excellent. . Pacific
Highway runs adjacent to the property. In addition, traffic moving
Page 4
S
East on Pacific Highway has available a turn lane into S.W. 69th
h t.
Avenue, which is the West boundary of the subject property.
3 (f) Effect on Surrounding Pro erty. •;?
The surrounding property is developed and is primarily
commercial. The only exception to this is the area immediately
North of the subject property which is residential. At the
present time, there is a large laurel hedge that separates the
subject property from the residence on the North boundary.
This hedge has the effect of screening the subject property
from the residence.
3 (g) Public Services.
C.
The proposed change would not necessitate a change in
the public services already available in the area.
3 (h) Adverse Impact on the Community.
The only possibility of an adverse impact of the proposed
use relates to the residential property immediately North of the
subject property. However, by landscaping and screening, this
adverse impact, if any, can be eliminated. Applicant will comply
with any and all reasonable suggestions of the Planning Department
of the City of Tigard in regard to this situation.
By TERRY C. HAUCK
Attorney for Applicants
Page 5
• ff
•
S�ryr rry yxi i ' k, 1P�F� C �(n :,p,
4a' a �% r4 � w � 24 44 ,
,< r K - o s Hit' 000 J .••t r •
fi.
r n51' , tr•,
ur 190 9 ` q5 .1 ,4
4ik5 V•• 2 e o o 2 9 o 1700 1800 ,t. 5 i°A
urak .1','.k
h s r� y, 0
o 4F"' O 311Ac m
O •O yr
' 4r. '";E '—' C,S 10390 aa„
�, '', CO 2 ti 5 r�
s•• 5 70 >20 6 55 95 • 2 5 ' �r
tr 1 Q
T.Ns
3 y,,
. 5 STRET 9?a �0q , N
' `r ,r-6 11C� 0
•f5 t 05 3 `d 56 Ac ,il
;0 3.400 3300 (4200 , �2�
of q't
I'''Yti�£• (C.5 N°12 •813) a
kk‘ktsk4W‘N"\■041, .9., 1
a r
4d i' S
Vfite—yr ,
1.55 i
��f stirs**
.1, te a
s.,....1...„......
O.
. 410 2
K< 44;161 •'r^v ��
■
'a p0�1f'
o
a
' "` \G \ 01500 1\di, 3874s
2A' ����
I,, ,
6501 }
r.I" 30844 w --114--
' Exk►��4 1 x
� ,�, , ,� SCALE lair- 100' j
tii s t }fin
• y\t k . 4}4e'.4'l kt 4" d ' 1 4 t ,;"),i'4;
5,•u Y eta.+�n'+ r
• t
i�` I � 5� Q ri` h z WI11,y4 � 7j a� Ii
°� r ' s r
4, ■ 1� "* , " " � r ' ,
� / 0
1
:14,4x
111,''y, `t 24 4 i r 000
o Z ' 41 `, ,
9012 ., a{Y ,
Jy ', 2800 2900 °b s q5 $'
1"f , c 1704 (gpp l� `r.. I J 0� j
co oo o° J SSA 0 �ry,
05. 10390 'i 31
1 95 95 0
'' F'f N E _ s9o1
t :6 STREET s'; ': 5�,
3500 f5 105 3 • +2� pp
„1 3440 3300 4200 M 580gc,
t w p -1 * 1Z
® + CC•5• No 12 81D
r
1 p 3301 G 4 300
es 105 1:,!
, q 4102
'HIV 135_ __5b9•so'E - 3 20
.z8`s p' — — "Z j 14- _Z
4100 2 2 41 16,.'C ;
iA 4101 •••?
IP
a
,'... i•
*4 dao`fit ;
r .o
1 !; G /*402- ...•::%:.'lei - -.I
yi, a \G4( _ -- 51iurN llN[t r
6,500
4.�,.— PG\� (90 3.8.7,44
Q •�;15cd.
:: ;g
vi 6501
; ,;, N--
SCALE ►' = toa'
i ' 1 xr'
4
" 1 0
.,..,,,,,,,,,,,..,,i,"1,.
+ : ir ,> y
s` 4
x■6 ;,' ,,,'..,'4';t, e ` �t�Yl rti r ��' 4�.� (lr '�E de',i dgt 'l d �y .g s
�� yi i,4,yy n ,i, k �}.( s , ,ea(sik ,� r r1i .�
■
w: a�llyli'
•
/�.
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
December 18, 1973
Agenda Item 5°I
CU 18-73 /Mobil Oil Corp. )
Conditional Use
For property located at I1900 S. W. Pacific Highway
101\
(Tax Map 2Sl2AA� Tax Lot
` '
1.12211.2212t
Mobil Oil Corporation
li
1
Conditional Use approval to allow a service station use
in a C 3, General Commercial zone.
To reconstruct an existing service station on the
subject site.
Staff Fi l
____~._
l" The subject site contains a service station that has
occupied the site since the early I930 ' o" The applicant
has never obtained conditional use approval to operate
a service station on this site and the planning staff
recommended the applicant apply for conditional use
approval rather than continue as a non-conforming use.
The applicant proposes to rehabilitate the existing
service station site by constructing a smaller service
station and creating an additional gas pump island.
2° The Tigard Community Plan designates the subject site
for General Commercial uses and defines said uses as
a range of retail and service commercial uses that N
benefit from a highway-oriented location. The plan
goes on to state "the development of individual
properties in these areas should take into account the
traffic safety and visual problems associated with
strip commercial development. n The stated use of the
property conforms to the Tigard Community Plan.
'
. __ ~--._ -
•
��
�
o�~ 3. The site plan submitted by the applicant does not meet
��' tho aouoea a d ag�aoa standards aet �o�th �n �e�t�on
I8°64" O/lO /d ^
' � Municipal Code) . Said Section
stating "no(d)curb cuts shall be allowed within thirty (30)
feet of an intersecting street right-of-way. " The
northern most curb cut into Pacific Highway creates
a confusing traffic pattern by allowing motorists exiting from
the subject station to cross a right turn lane to rejoin
Pacific Highway traffic.
4. The applicant' s site currently utilizes an access easement
fronting� the "Lone Oak Restaurant". According to
Chapter 18.64 (Tigard Municipal Code) the City Attorney
must review and approve all non-dedicated access agreements
prior to issuance of a building permit.
| /
�� 5° The existing use does fulfill a community need by providing
' ` automobile fuel, oil, moor repairs and automotive supplies
in an area of Tigard with a high traffic count and dense
[`
commercial development. No other service stations are
located in the immediate vicinity. The applicant states
the "existing service station is extremely successful".
6. It should be noted that the current service station
lessee operates a towing service from this site. Tow
trucks are parked extremely close to the curb, adjacent
Pacific Highway, seriously impairing pedestrian movement
and visibility by motorists. Such parking of tow trucks
creates a pedestrian and traffic safety hazard.
7. Increased traffic volume on S. U. Pacific Highway since
early I930 is a change of condition substantiating the
need for a service station on the subject, however, �
this same traffic volume increase has aggravated traffic
flow conflicts upon entering and exiting the subject
station.
8" The site is suitable for the existing use, if traffic
flow conflicts can be minimized. Said conflicts can
be minimized by revising the applicant's site development
plan.
9. The proposed service station remodeling will have a
beneficial effect on the surrounding noighborhood»
providing a modernized facility, increased maneuvering
area and landscaping.
�-�
~^ '
Page 2 - PC staff report - I2_ 73
--. ..,,,,...... . , . .
. , . .
. . .
. ,
, .
' .
100 All necessary public services are available at the site.
4: No new public services will be necessitated.
t
11. The applicant's response to the "Fasano" requirements
and a submitted vicinity map are attached.
,
12. To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle movement and to
ensure public safety in the public ways adjacent the v,
,
subject site, an eight (8) foot wide pedestrian-bike
=
path should be provided by the applicant to minimize
,
the conflict between on-site vehicle maneuvering and
access and egress for off-site vehicular needs.
V.
Staff Recommendation
Based upon the aforementioned findings, approval of the fl
applicant' s request subject to the following conditions. kl
'V
1. No tow truck, vehicle or other physical obstruction
shall be allowed to obstruct the area included within
the public right-of-way, nor shall said obstruction V
v
impair a motorist' s view across the subject site in
a 40 foot arc measured from the site' s property corner
located at the intersection of S. W. Pacific Highway
and S. W. Hall Boulevard.
' AT'
' V 2. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of ..
Chapter 18. 64 (Tigard Municipal Code) and reflect
on his site development plan a vehicular circulation
plan that maximizes public safety. The Planning
Commission shall review the site development plan
as an addition to the normal site development standards
in relation to public safety and make a finding that
[
the site development does maximize public safety. t
3. The applicant shall construct 8 foot wide concrete
sidewalks to facilitate pedestrian movement along the
public ways adjacent the subject site. Said sidewalks
shall be constructed to City of Tigard standards.
[
. [
1
i
I
Page 3 - PC staff report - 12-18-73
y+nqn,w+r.;as«Mwar.`*aaeMea+wnatmW nM�r(rv'r,�� r;saw
i - . .._',.''';;;4- .ti,,N,,, ..,-. '; ,'
lASA110 ar,QtrIssitErts 8TA1°EIOMt AS ,0ONDITIONA sus ,
USE APPLICATION SNC PAR AND WALL T,IQIID, OUGO ' '.;
o:
A. Specific purpose of application is for conditional use approval
to rehabilitate existing Dibii service station.
tB. Existing seeing does not confer to Tigard's ceiprehensive plan.
li All service station use falls is conditional use category. .
t C. Conditional use request does fulfill community need. Existing
$ service station is extremely successful and has occupied the
location since the early 1,30 1 s•
D. There have been no changes in conditions which would affect
t application for a sons change.
w
'' E. The proposed location is the most suitable location in the city
t of Tigard as proven by the fact of its success over the past 40
,!} years. . Reasons for this success are the central location and
exposure to maximum vehicles in any 24 hour period.
F. There will be no new effect on any of the adjacent properties
or neighborhoods.
G. Be new public services are necessitated by requested conditional il
bi
' use. 't
i,
t+ t on the community.R. Proposed conditional use has no adverse impac ;.!
Proposed rehabilitation will upgrade entire facilities, greatly
improve visibility through the intersection, and be made more
pleasing to the eye by the effective use of ground cover and �!
1 plantings.
1
a0)1---c_,X),4--
. . ,1
L A. D. Eckois
s' Neal Estate Representative
t
1 'i
r
4,
1
,
1
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
December 18, 1973
Agenda Item 6°1
CU 17-73 (Weed Control Service, Inc. )
Temporary Use
For property located at 1I564 S. W. Pacific Highway
(Tax Map 1S136DA, Tax Lots 901 & 1000)
i
Weed Control Sorvioen Inc.
2122112. 12,_flequest
To place mobil office (trailer) on subject property
- for a maximum of two years.
v
To place a mobil office ( trailer) on the oUb ^eA property
so as to provide office space for three employees of
Weed Control Service, Inc. , the building owner' s company,
and currently a tenant of this property. The mobil office
space to be wired for electricity and all other utility
services will be available in the existing structure. '
Staff Find '
a.9.2
1. Applicant' s justification for the subject request is
attached.
2. The Planning Commission according to Section I8,80.020
of the Tigard Municipal Code, may issue temporary use
permits for a longer period than 6 months following due
procedure for conditional use as set forth in Chapter
I8° 84^ Tigard Municipal Code.
3. The PlanWng Commission, in order to issue a temporary use
mr permit must make a finding that one or more of five
�
-^ conditions described by Section 18"80° 030r Tigard Municipal
Code, exist.
/ . `
AMINNIPr
•
, .
It is the staff's opinion that the applicant has not
. submitted information that would enable the Planning
Commission to make such a finding. The applicant has
not proven loss of leasehold casualty loss of premises,
eviction from other premises by a public body, that the
use is limited in duration by the nature of the use or
that the purpose or the use is compatible with and
incident to the basic purpose for which the land is
being developed.
4. Site is zoned C-3, General Commercial. All adjacent
lands are zoned C-3, General Commercial. Adjacent land
uses include Santry Trucking to the northeast and
Arrow Heating Company to the southwest.
Staff Recommendation
Denial of the request, unless the applicant submits
satisfactory evidence at the December 181 1973 public
hearing supporting one or more of the findings
necessitated by Section 18.80.030 (Tigard Municipal Code) .
4
Page 2 - PC staff report - 12/18/73
_ _
....t.. ,.,,e..:..,,_• e,.z_..... .,v.-+_,w_._..i __ __ L.:i�'SAWIRk.L Y,.RSi4.:- "7"44016P
Yr Y
yY VII a''4
"s #rt ' YAP , -
REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY USE 1
i
REQUEST: To place a mobile (trailer) office facility on ` .
1.
property for a maximum of two years to provide office
space for three (3) employees of Weed Control Service, `4
Inc. , the building owner' s company, and currently a 4
tenant on this property. This space will be wired ��
for electricty and all other utility services will
be available in the existing structure. Request is
necessitated by the requirements of the building ;,?
owner' s proposed tenant, Mark 50 Machinery, Inc. , to
• occupy the entire office, shop and warehouse
tfacility for purposes of conducting engineering, sales,
LOCATION: Mnbvic e oa
nd cae s sembly to f wmac hbn ery fon thn gwo od y products
dry
•
10' in width. It will be located at the rear of the
grade level with the existing structures along the
east property line. The facility will not be visible j
from Pacific Highway. '
PROPERTY INFORMATION:Legal Description
Tax Lots 901 and 1000 in the S.E. 1/4 of Section
36, T1S, R1W, W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington County,
Oregon. s'
t.
Address
11564 S.W. Pacific Highway
Zoning
I
C-3 General Commercial, City of Tigard
CURRENT USE: Non-conforming use permit for light industry. Property
is occupied by Weed Control Service, Inc. and Utility
Equipment, Inc. (See attached description of business
activity) .
i, PROPOSED USE: Continuation of non-conforming use for light industry. 1
Property will be occupied by Weed Control Service, Inc. ;;i
and Mark 50 Machinery, Inca The latter has offered
to lease for two years with an option to purchase
property. Mark 50 Machinery, Inc. 's business activity t
is engineering, sales, service and assembly of {+,
machinery for the wood products industry. jri
t I a
`
I
,,
e
•
( Request for Temporary Use = 2 = November 29, 1973 1';
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Land t'
Subject property is both irregularly shaped and of varying
contour. Land fronts 152. 3 ' on the southeast side of 6
the frontage road of S.W. Pacific Highway and has a
general reverse L shape. Total area of the plot is
1. 93 acres. Frontage on S.W. Pacific Highway is at
highest elevation with a sharp drop of perhaps 25 '
via a paved road to an intermediate grade and a
second drop of perhaps 20 ' to 25' to the lower grade.
An additional lower level is also noted but of no
great consequence. The S.W. Pacific Highway grade
level contains the industrial improvements including
blacktop areas, the intermediate elevation has a
crushed rock and gravel storage area, with the lower
level also utilized for storage via crushed rock
or gravel road. A small area at the most southerly
edge of the property is not being used.
•
Improvements
Improvements consist of a combination office-industrial
type concrete tilt-up frame with a flat roof over the
\,_ offices and an arched truss roof over the shop area.
Secondary buildings consist of Rose City precut metal
and a primary storage warehouse which are to the rear
of the primary structure. The structures are all on the
Pacific Highway grade along the west property }..
boundary.
' J
NEIGHBORHOOD DATA: Subject property is located on the northeasterly city
limits of Tigard, Oregon and outside the southwesterly
city limits of Portland, Oregon. The immediate area
of the subject property is retail predominant across the
Pacific Highway to the north and industrial on the
subject side. ii
A peculiarity of the neighborhood was caused by the I
relocation of S.W. Pacific Highway and the use of a
frontage road for a distance of about one-half mile on the
north side of the main arterial. The frontage road is
above the grade of the main highway and accesses it
about one-fourth mile away on either side of the
subject industrial building. This topographic feature
has limited the commercial use of the subject property
and caused the growth along the length of the frontage
road to be primarily industrial with some retail
and/or service station at ,the access points. See
attached Exhibit for adjoining property uses.
•
r
Request for Temporary Use = 3 = November 29, 1973
PARKING: Property currently is striped for 20 car
parking on the primary grade level with parking
for an estimated 25 to 35 additional cars on the
lower grades.
EMPLOYEES: Currently there are approximately 22 to 25 employees.
The proposed tenant would not increase this number.
t
a
'' 1 u i.k� ,,-e ,,,i4*.,,4. ,,1.x., Tit 4i x'� .... .. .,hi4W! hi„.
F ``yy,. t 'N4 +,t` ,t' , ,,, 4 t,.” '3v x IM ,4,„.,,,11 �'n• R!,--{',,�•x` @1W P 1'# k..
�4` 1 ° k ,,W eti:_ft 171 a, k• -1 1,,k" I ,54, 4 f[ F
•.+' ,4,..•:-.:,,,t, ' 1l x -,4 65 #k,x;e x 11 1 k,„4,?:,tt ? r+.,,.t e ' a
,'$.,', t+btu 1 ,. r ir, '04.". , p f P§ a ' Sir q1t j # '
r • A K n A• a X r Y d x i � y+ .,
.!,_ tr.Ot, f,C,,, 6 ,ih +4F t, ` ';+fQ.• r s11:1144',,,,,,e'',. '
add ? ,r"`'#. n[i #. �
' • t,...'5'Ql)f r',, , .15''' ,. ', ,o,..- q, ' ' ;-i;,)-e,''1,es At,)'
11 P ,' :-.,14, 1
e > 7Lty a` F f�,.i.44 1 tr
'x 7 x ..f.'„,,'. 7� ''
�'',h r+"cxay d 'Ali:�� ik .' u
si 4 '.'o5A1;{S .1 t'`x a -
1 s F �.} 1
V _
�' 1�'ifi}s�3 u Q I
',"•,,"' f:
r$'.„'
{s, tk. 5110" P+efo tY. rTER. r� / ...r ML6
y \ _'
2 / `
\
(4','14,;;:-.1`41:t3 ,,/ \1 r\123 1k
". 1. J
c4(.°' \ , ,
7 .
\ ;F
.",
. .. , ,,, / /. . . \
• +-V , 11
x,.
v 1 /7
" / A ee� I t '1
Pi fife
fi \
/-"//44141:14:44\''tt A T�j�'a
.Cxi1
r e''' A'-..?
e 1P r'
t /' 'J,Efi.e4 vi
!er' 1r
r Sr
3, ' I 111, 1 I ,t
r. , • 1 f
1 4
1, 1 Q f !
(�.EN#�►I I4e'tcE Ysl;�,
a •i�i r, +•
I
4' 'k f tr Fit , `
1
}, E Igo 3E ; 1 ',.."'"2',,, `.
I■ it
• d,1 �1
,,r,'„,„ V) ( t e.'§ i'
+i•-,' ! t f
sf
•
' .
\ ( � '
K�
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
Site Development Plan Review
December 18� 1973
842 Ted Nelson Company ^
' 1
. �
Location: I4280 S. W. 72nd Avenue
l° The applicant has submitted landsoapepirrigation and
site plans of sufficient detail to meet the intent
of submission standards set forth in Chapter l8° 58
(Tigard Municipal Code) .
2. The applicant has submitted
landscape
rrigotioP and
site plans meeting the landscape and site standards
of Chapter
18° 58 (Tigard Municipal Code) and has
fulfilled the intent of said Chapter with the exception
of a 110 foot driveway entrance adjacent S. W. 72nd
Avenue.
Said driveway is exceedingly long and provides in-
,
adequate control of vehicles entering or exiting S. W.
72nd Avenue, thereby adversely affecting public safety.
In order to control access and egress related to public
ways the Public Works Director restricts curb cuts to
a maximum width of 30 feot^ consequently no interior
driveway providing access to a public way should exceed
30 feet in width.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of the site and landscaping plan as submitted
by the applicant subject to the following condition'
The applicant submit for staff approval, revised plans
reflecting 30 foot maximum width driveways adjacent
S. W. 72nd Avenue. The areas not then being used for
driveways shall be landscaped in a manner identical to
that landscape character currently shown on the applicant' s
submitted landscape plan" The irrigation system to be �
revised accordingly.
. '
^_- - ` — .
~ / � '
'_ -_`. -_�~� - _-_ -�___ - `'^�-_- - - ` ~-�^
_ �'--,_~�r
( ,
( � � TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
Miscellaneous
December 18, I973
9°1 Summerfield - Golf course maintenance building and
t ation of site
| '
[
Location: Directly east of the current terminus of S. W.
Summerfield Drive at S. W. 98th Avenue; adjacent
the 3rd tee.
Staff Findings
l" Conditions attached to the "Summerfield" Planned Develop-
ment District, relating to the first phase apartment
development are as follows:
(l\ Prior to the issuance of any building permit
(1)
within the development, a site plan of the
entire development setting forth the site
fe'�
development standards shall be submitted to the
Planning Commission. This plan shall include
but not be limited to landscaping, setbacks,
building heights, signs, streets, proposed
improuomantom sidewalks, curbs, gutters, parking,
service and storage areas"
/ \ Each phase of the development shall be reviewed
`
aOd approved by the Planning Commission. At the
time of approval of each phase, the densities
and uses shall be approved.
2" The staff supports the location and use proposed by the
applicant. A need exists for this type of facility
and the location is appropriate from the standpoint
of access by vehicles and golfers. The structure is
located 195 feet from S. W. 98th Avenue, a sufficient
distance to prevent problems of traffic safety.
3. The site plan of the area surrounding the proposed structure
has several limitations.
•
°automobiles must back directly onto a public way to
utilize the proposed parking.
°pedestrians must walk in the street to avoid parked
automobiles. �
°a distance of 25 feet separates the proposed maintenance '^
_
' .
`
-' _-
�
� ' |
, ^
restroom structure from proposed townhouses to the
east, a potential conflict of uses.
4° The proposed structure is located to prevent removal
of an existing oak tree.
5" The landscaping proposed by the applicant is adequate
and an asset to natural beauty of the surrounding
community.
6° The Commission has previously approved a 5 foot sidewalk
and 8 foot bicycle path on S. W. Summerfield Drive west
of S. W. 98th Avenue. The Commission should consider
the extension of these facilities east of S. W. 98th
Avenue.
Staff .Recommendations
Tabling the applicant' s request for approval until January
18, 1974 so as to enable the applicant to submit a revised
site plan that is sensitive to the limitations described
in findings 3 and the question raised by finding 6"
-~
The staff recommends the Planning Commission reaffirm the
concept of a 8 foot sidewalk and 8 foot bicycle path adjacent
S. W. Summerfield Drive as shown in exhibit "D" of the Planned
Development District approval by the Tigard City CoumuiI"
The staff further recommends the 8 foot bike path be placed
on the south side of S. W. Summerfield Drive, the entire
length of S. W. Summerfield Drive.
�
9. 2 .Consideration f t b l in U nited Pr t ioD
Churo
Location: S. W. Canterbury Lane at S. W. Pacific Highway.
Staff F
__~ 2
1. Section I6" 36° 020 (4) , Tigard Municipal Code, states
the following:
Directional Signs. Directional signs may be located
at street intersections within all zones, after approval
by the Planning Commission. Such signs shall be twelve
inches by forty-two inches, pointed at one end, any
painted colors, lettering or design eymbols. Not more
than eight such signs shall be ^
permitted at any one
street intersection. ' The sign shall be provided by the
~~
developer and turned over to the public works do artmont
with a fee of ten dollars per sign. The City will erect
the sign at heights and location approved by the Planning
Commission. Directional signs may be allowed for the
Page 2 - PC staff report - l2-I8-73
------'
. \ \
following uses and others held similar by the Planning
��.
Commission:
A Public elementary, junior and high schools;
B Public parks and golf courses;
(C) Community shopping centers;
(0) Regional shopping centers;
(E) Industrial parks;
(F) Public auditoriums, coliseums, stadiums, civic
centers or meeting places.
2. The applicant requests the above described sign to
enable the public to be directed to their church where
non-profit services are provided and civic groups hold
meetings. The "Loaves and Fishes" program is head-
quartered in the subject church.
3° The planning staff finds that a proliferation of
directional signs, not meeting high design standards
are a possibility under the current provisions for
directional signs as described in the Tigard Sign Code.
4. The elderly, who utilize the subject churches "Loaves
and Fishes" program have a difficult time locating
the subject church.
Staff ndation
Approval of a directional sign for one year, said sign to
be placed on and above the standard street identification
sign in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of S. W.
Pacific Highway and S. We Canterbury Lane, and furthermore
that the planning staff be directed to draft a revision
to the Sign Code, so as to cause all directional signs to
be constructed by the City utilizing the standard street
sign format and conveying the sign cost to the applicant.
9.3 Intarpretation of Use: a ro"u oat I b Harla �David
son
of Portland consider l . � .
----- {
and acoomao G-J
� ^ . |
General Commercial
21.911_flaslaaa
1. The applicant, in his request for Planning Commission
interpretation, states the proposed use qualifies as
a "sporting good store" for the following reasons:
"The premises will be used strictly for retail sales
of motorcycles and motorcycle accessories. "
°"All merchandise will be displayed and sold inside
the building. "
Page 3 ~ PC staff report - I2-I8-73
_ � ' � ,�-' � ' �~�-��_
°"There will be no outside sales lot::
°"This will be a branch of our main store and will conduct
no repairing, refurbishing or painting whatsoever. "
2. The "sporting good store" land use category is a permitted
Use in a C-3, General Commercial zone. The staff interprets
the proposed use as more closely linked to automobile
sales and automobile parts sales, which are conditional
use in General Commercial zones. A "sporting good
store" is construed to mean sales of a variety of sporting
goods, such as baseball mits, skis, basketballs and
sports related clothing. Because of the nature of
motorcycle sales, noise, odor and the necessity of moving
vehicles on and off the site and usually outdoor display,
the staff feels strongly that the proposed use be
interpreted as related to automobive sales and therefore
be considered a conditional use.
Staff Recommendation
Interpretation of the proposed motorcycle sales facility as
related to the sale of motor vehicles and thus a conditional
use in a C-3, General Commercial zone.
(:
Page 4 - PC staff report - 12-18-73
•
Y fir`s
L%/ 551�
tt i1, i i
r` -'.` $, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report _ ,=a ,
�,x Miscellaneous };
r r
December 18, 1973 ,,
ha 9. 5 Street Vacation; S.W. 69th Avenue between S.W.
Hampton Street and the vacated S.W. Irving .,.
Vii.
fi Staff Findings
1. The Tigard npl■ .,
Deyet� �e.,} Plan indicates S
Tria
a pattern of "super-blocks" that will be created
(). by vacating unneeded segments of existing, dedicated
' street right-of-way.
These super-blocks will 'q
' , permit the consolidation of land holdings into
`r parcels that will accomodate large office developments.
The Lamb-Weston site is an example of an area where
a section of unneeded right-of-way has already
1' been vacated.
A; 2. The subject street vacation as requested by
t Lincoln Properties Inc. , the adjacent property
owner, is also supported by Lamb-Weston Inc. , who
.�� is the other adjacent property owner.
3. The previous vacation of S.W. Irving Street has
prevented the continuation of S.W. 69th Ave. ,
south into the tarnaer°a Insurance Property.
4. Previous Planning Commission a pproval of the
Farmer ' s Insurance Group preliminary development
�., plan and program did not anticipate the extension
` of `;•W. 69th Ave. into the Farmer's site.
;" 5. Access into the Farmer' s Insurance site will be
j adequate when S.W. 68th Avenue is improved.
' S.W. 66th Avenue currently provides access to the
Farmer's Insurance site. S.W. 68th Ave. is the
i`, street most logically located to provide access to the 1`
, Farmer's Insurance site. €<!
,
b.', .
6. The Tigard Triangle Development Plan indicates a
a°� vacated S.W. 69th Avenue between S.W. Hampton
,: Street and the Vacated S.W. Irving Street, thus,
the vacation request conforms to the Tigard Triangle in
i,&
i,t'? Development Plan.
r,
rt ,t` Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
the vacation of S.W. 69th Avenue between S.W. Hampton '"
Street and the vacated S.W. Irving. Ten feet of S.W. 69th
p.,,,,
Avenue adjacent S.W. Hampton Street should not be vacated r
in order to provide for the future right-of-way needs for
an improved S.W. Hampton Street.