Loading...
Planning Commission Packet - 06/19/1973 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. p AGENDA TIC nannING COMMISSION Regular M ti1'_: d jUne 19, 1973 Twa lity Jr. Imo_4 School - lecture roo". 14650 S.W. 97th Ave., Tigard, Oregon SStudy Session = 7:30 QP.M. Public Hearing ° 8°.00 S 1• CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of May 15, 1973 4. Pur:L c HEARING - Zone change 4.1 Zone Change ZC 4-73 (Farmers Insurance) An application by FO I. C. Holding Company to change a zsne classification fro,.. R-7, Single Family Residenti and 0-3 to P-I), Planned Development to allow the future construction of a motel-office park complex. The subject property is bounded by Highway 217, Interstate 5 and the Lamb-Weston property and comprises 27.76 acres (Tax Map 251 1D, Tax Lots 100, 200, 3000 400, 500, 501, 701 and 1100) Staff Findings Testimony and Cross Examination Staff Recommendation Commission Discussion and Action 4.2 Zone Change ZC 1-72 (Lindquist) A request by S. H. Lindquist to rehear and consider extension of P-D zoning on property located on the East side of Hall Boulevard, 300 feet south of Bonita Road and comprising 7.61 acres. (Tax Map 251 12B, Tax lot 1700) Staff Findings E Testimony and Cross E .�:."inlation Staff Reoonm.endation Comocission Discussion and ,Action 5. PUBLIC HEARING - Conditional Use Ir. 5.1 Conditional Use CU 13-73 (Chamberlain) !' An ,-ppli©ationn by Arrow Heating *ompany for consideration of a planned residential development lo =teal north of Walnut and 400 feet east of S.W. 121st, adjacent t►:- Brook way Subdivision. Staff Findings Testimony and Cross Examination Staff Recommendation Commission Discussion and Action 5.2 Conditional Use CU 12-73 (Schulz) An application by S. N. S. Development Corporation to construct duplexes on four lots fronting S.W. Tiedeman 130 feet north of S.W. Walnut Street in the proposed Clydesdale Subdivision. Staff Findings Testimony r;.nd Cross Examination Staff Recommendation Commission Discussion and Action 6. PUBLIC a;:-A.•;lam v Variance 6.:. Variance a,ce V 2-73 °Cit of Ti:.,:rd) A0 application by the City of Tigard to wary a side yard setback requirement of 20 feet to 16 feet for a proposed office-shop building at the Tigard City �1 Shops located. on Ash Street 250 feet southwest of S.W. Burnham. Staff Findings Testimony and Cross E..�,.nination • Staff Recommendations Commission Discussion and Action ;€ 7. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Page 2 v PC Agenda - June 19, 1973 • 4MMsMMEMsRIM 8. SITE DESIGN REIN il 8.1 Arrow Heating - Planned Residential Staff Recommendations Council Discussion _:,■; Action 8.2 Tigard Industrial Park - Phase II Staff Recommendations Commission Discussion and Action 6.3 Utility Equipment Company • Staff Re(.40mmendations Commission Discussion and Action 4'. 8.4 Travers & Johnston - Office Park Staff Reco n ,rations Commission Disccuussioan and Action 8.5 New JUnaior High School E; Staff Recommendations Commission Discussion and Action 8.6 Clark Industries - Curl Acres Staff Recommendations 's. Commission Discussion ami Action 8.7 Hyster - Outdoor Storage Discussion 8.8 Byers Photo Discussion 6.9 Sudlow Duplexes Discussion i Page 3 - PC Agexda - June 19, 1973 9. SUBDIVISIONS - MINOR LA.ND PARTITIONING 9.1 Brown Property Discuss ion 9.2 Finley Property Discussion 10. ADJOURNMENT Page 4 - PC Agana - June 19, 1973 E tin: S i 1 AGENDA A! t: CITY OF TIGARD p. Planning Commission Study Session Date: June 5, 1973 (Tuesday) Place: Charles F. Tigard Grade School Board Room Time: 7:30 P.M. 1, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - Action 1.1 Kadel Laundromat 1.2 Schulz 1.3 Crow Warehouse 1.4 Webber Dance Studio I7 2, SlTZ DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - Study 2.1 New Jior High School 2.2 Tigard Industrial Park 2.3 Travers & Johnston Office Park 3. Zone Change Requests - Study 1, 3.1 Farmer's Insurance - PD r;' 3.2 Lindquist - PD x 3.3 Chamberlain - PD i; 3.4 Schulz - Duplex Conditional Use i_'. 4. VARIANCE REQUESTS - Study . 4.1 Frahler Electric z3' 4.2 Variance for new planning & public works office ` 5. MISCELLANEOUS - Study I(;x fA 5.1 Billboard l'i 5.2 Street Name & Address ti. 5.3 GRAG's Regional Development Guide '1 IA t q P MINUTES • TIGARD BANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting - June 19e 1973 Twality Jr. High School - lecture room 14650 S.W. 97th Ave., Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER A. The meeting was called to order at 8:00 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL A. Present: Commissioners B , Barkhurst, Hartman, Lewis, Meal.; Chairman Whittaker; Planning Director, Wink Brooks; Associate Planner, Dick Bol.xi; City Attorney, Fred Anderson _ B. Absent: Commissioner Paterson 3. APPROVAL 07 ITh' S A. ¶lte minutes were approved as sdbmitted by unanimous vote of the Commission present. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - Zone Change 4.1 Zone Change ZO 4-73 (Farmers Insurance) An application by F. I. G. Holding Company to change a zone classification from R-7, Single Family Residential and C-3 to P-I), Planned Development to allow the future construction of a motel-office park. complex. The subject property is bounded by Highway 217, Interstate 5 and the Lamb-Weston property and comprises 27.76 acres (Tax Map 251 1D, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 501, 701 and 1100) 1, Staff Recommendation The staff informed the Planning Commission that the applicant has requested that consideration of their application be held over to the next public hearing. In that the Commission decided in their study session at 7:30 tonight to hold an additional public hearing each month this item will be heard on July 3rd. • • • 4.2 Zone Change ZC 1-72 (Lindquist A request by S, R. Lindquist to rehear and consider extension of P-D zoning on property located on the east side of Hall Boulevard, 300 feet south of Bonita Road and coaaprising 7,61 acres. (Tax Map 281 ]2B, Tax Lot 1700) 1. Staff Findings The staff stated that it has found no additional findings since the original approval of this P-D zone in J'anxAe 1972 and that although no substantial progress has been made 1' toward construction of the proposed Planned Development, the proposal remains in conformance with Tig rd's adopted. Community Plan and fulfills a community need for :.dditional housing. qq 2, Testimony and Cross examination A. Proponent: 10 Mr, Lindquist, S.E. Tacoma Street, Portland, stated that he was the developer and due to difficulties in financing the project, he is requesting some minor changes in original approval, plus an extension of to, one year G? time period0 1 • 2. Chairman Whittaker questioned the witness as to the new conditions the staff would present. The following is proponents testimony and he was in agreement with those possible conditions. 3. Mr. Lindquist replied that he had worked with the staff and was in agreement with the conditions 3 he had discussed with the staff. 4. No one present in the audience wished to cross examine the witness. B. Opposition: 1. There was no one present in opposition to the request. 3. Staff Recommendation A. The staff pointed out that the Planning Commission and City Council previously approved the request with 14 conditions, The staff has reviewed these conditions • and has revised them as follows: Page 2 - PC Minutes - June 19, 1973 C \. 1. The total number of dwelling units shall be no}.. more than 36 including no more than 5 d.npleaces to be located only on lots abutting Hail Blvd. 2. That the normal front, side and rear setb,.cks may be waived, except the rear setbacks along the ,perimeter lot lines of each plat shall be a minimum of 15 feet, and provided t.a, .t each dwelling unit shall have at least one yard of 20 feet or more and the plans to be approved by the Planning Department. 3. That ;; 1 utilities shall be underground. 4. That the developer dedicate to the City of Ti =rd a park located in the central area of the Planned Development surrounded by the central access road. Said park t. be landscaped, irrigated and equiped with play equi.,,�; ant. Iasi +;o. of this park facility to be approved by the Planning Department. 5. That lands,',; .ing Plans sho .rng, sizes, locations J and types of trees and plant materials for the Hall Boulevard frontage be approved by the Planning Department. That earthy berm be constructed along the frontage of Hall Boulevard having a minimum height of 3 feet to be located at least 10 feet from the existing right-of right-of...way of Hall Boulevard. 6. That the developer agree to construct a 6 foot wide bicycle/pedestrian pathway in the right-of-way along Hall Boulevard. The construction and design of this facility shall, be approved by the Oregon State Highway Department. 7. That the developer provide curb side sidewalks on both sides of the easterly and southerly entry roads into the subdivision and on the outside of the circle road within the subdivision. No sidewalks shall be required in the Cul-de-sac areas of the subdivision. 8. That single family dwellings may have common walls, plans to be approved by the Planning Department. 9. That 10 feet be dedicated to the City along the frontage of Hall Boulevard for future street Page 3 • PC Minutes June 19, 1973 improvements and that individual lots shall not h .have direct :;aces s to gal.. Boulevard. 10. That engineering plans and specifications shall q be .pprov�ed prior to the acceptance of the final plat. That the preliminary plat shall be identified as such, dated and have a north point. 11. That the scale of the preliminary Plat shall be revised to show surrounding subdivisions and their lot p.tterns. 12. That all streets shall be 4,-0,,d and easement s o.wn on the preliminary plat. 13. . That traffic in the circular central street be one way running counter clodk vise. 14. T',.t on street parking shall be allowed only on the outside perimeter of the circular streot. r;. 4. Commission Discussion and Action r, A. Mt. `ticoli questioned condition number 8 which states • that duplexes :-.nd single f ..sii1y dwellings may have coffin walls. He said that this would in affect allow 4 plexes within the subdivision -:inl he found this type of building to be ix :ppropriate. Mt. Nicoll moved to $. approve the request with the staff's reoc ommennded 1<. conditions with the exception of deleting the word duplexes from condition number 8. B. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion and the Commission x approved it with a unanimous vote of the members present. 5. PUBLIC BEARING o Conditional. Use I? 5.1 Conditional Use CU 13-73 (Chamberlain) An application by.Arrow Beating, Company for consideration of a planned residential development located north of Walnut Street and 400 feet east of S.W. 121st, ,:djacent the BrookvaY Subdivision. 1. Staff Findings A. The staff presented a list of 12 findings the outstanding points being that: page 4 - PC Minutes 'Rine 191, 1973 1. The proposal conforms to the Ti-..rd Community' Plan. 2. The proposed density conforms to the R zoning density. 3. That adeguc tce public access and utilities are adjacent or otherwise serve the site. 4+, That the applicant's property is not suitable for the c+ntinuation of the City's proposed greenway system as an existing dedicated right-of-may exists 800 feet to the west. I?. 5. That the applicant has demonstrated a means of Gi maintaining open space and common areas by means of a homeowner's association. ti 2. Public Hearin A. Proponent s: ; 1. &roe Chamberlain tae property owner rid Pelv°in Mace, 4'+ project architect, spoke in favor of the request. 2. Mc°. ChaMberlain was questioned by the residents present about the ownership of the duplex units.. W. Cbadberlain stated that the units mould be of owner-renter type with tom; owner renting the adjacent unit. B. Opponents: 1. Residents of the Brookway Subdivision were present in opposition to the applicant's proposal. Their testimony centered upon the f of that there would be rental units in the development. 2. Ron Andre of 121st Ave. testified concerning the fact that there would,be rental' units and stated that the existing apartments in Beliwod had created. problems p in their community which made h m . apposed to any further rental units. 3. Staff Recommendation Based upon the findings :;.nnd testimony offered, the staff recommended recommended.approval of the applicant's request with the foilovings: Page 5 - PC Minutes • June 19, 1973 1. A homeowners associ.tion (s) shall be formed to maintKin o the dam, lake, 10 feet of lake frontage and the duplex landscape and access are:s. Tract "Buv shall revert to the ownership of the Homeowners Association upon the sale of either lot 6 or 7 as indicated on the preliminary plat A. 2. The applicant shall cause deed restriction to be placed on Tract "B", so preventing any future residential development in the interest of the future public health and safety. This restriction not to preclude said tract's use for agriculture, grazing and necessary sturetures to carry out these uses. 3. The applicant shall dedicate to the City sufficient land to provide a 30 foot riR:it of-way width from the center line of Walnut Street. l+. The duplex property owner (s) shall, agree to support the formation of a local improvement district to bring S.W. Walnut Street up to City collector street standards and that the present property owner (s) shall execute a recordable covenant herewith. 5. All lots for single family dwellings shall cover 4 minimum 1:nd area ti.'f 15,E square feet. 6. The site and latdscapirng plans of the duplex area shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 7. Before a building permit shall be issued for construction of duplex units on the subject site, the ,applicant shall submit and the Planning Commission shall approve, a preliminaA,y subdivision plat of lot 1 and a program for common maintenance of access 'ways and landscaped areas. 8. All utilities shall be placed underground. 9. The cul-de-sac and street on the southeastern corner of the site shall be dedicated to the City and constructed to City standards. 3. Commission Discussion and Action A. Barkhurst proposed to table consideration of the request u itil. later in the evening, after all of the testimony on the public hearing items held 'been heard. Lewis seconded and the motion L. passed unanimously. Page 6 - PC Minutes - June 19, 1973 n. • B. After the public he:ring, when the Planning Commission did consider the request, discussion centered around three major points: 1. Whether the application, even thou:,* a conditional use, should be considered according to the rules of F..:san o. 2. Should the area outside of the .pplicati.n boundary but part of the ownership and desi:.c ted on the nap as parcel 0°BUo by the City Planner, be considered as part of the application? 3. Opponents testimony which was concerned with rental units. C. Ba.l stated that he was concerned due to previous reft.4:rks by the City- Attorney as to whether or not F san o s k..uld apply to this conditional use in that the impacts upon the area were essentially the same as would be produced if this were a 2enue change. He also stated that he felt testimony provided in opposition to the appliv,.tion did not provide a proper bsis for consideration by the Planning ( Commission. That the opponents were asking the Planning Commission to deny the application based upon the social belief that people who occupy multiple dwellings are a different class of people than t., se who occupy single family hoaxes. He stated that the Planning Commission should not rely upon this evidence as pertinent to the Planning issue at hand. D. After considerable discussion Lewis moved and Barkhurst seconded to table this item to the next public hearing to allow the applicant to confer with the staff and City Attorney in reference to the requirements resulting from Fasano. The motion was approved by a 4 to 1 vote with Hartman abstaining and Ball voting no. 5.2 Conditional Use CU 12-73 (Schulz) An application by S.N.S. Development Corporation to construct duplexes on four lots fronting S.W. Tiedeman 130 feet north of S.W. Walnut Street in the proposed Clydesdale Subdivision C Page 7 - PC Minutes - June 19, 1973 ee f, 1. Staff Findings The principal findings s related to the request's conformance with the Tigard Community Plan. It was found tiaet the request for four duplexes in Clydesdale would exceed the plan's density requirements by one unit. 2. Public Rearing A. Proponents: 1. Chudkk Schulz of S.N.S. Development Corporation spoke for the applicant stating that the existing Clydesdale subdivision is below the densities allowed in the Community Plan and the duplex es would allow the applicant to bring the density up those allowable while helping to offset certain development costs such 4:s improvement of Tiedem an Street and dedication of open space and bike path construction, B. Opponents: 1. There were some residents present from the subdivision to the south inc opposition to the application. They were concerned about additional traffic caused by the duplexes on 106 and the fact that these would be rental units. 3. Staff Recomm edation A. Staff recommended eeproval of the request stipulating the following conditions: ].. That approval be granted for the construction of two duplexes at the entrance of the s ibdivision on lots 1 and 24 in Clydesdale. 2. That said approvel be contingent u+.nn the recording of the final plat for the Clydesdale subdivision and that lot 1 and 24 meet the minimum lot size requirement of 130100 square feet when recorded. 3. That the submitted site plan be concerned with fencing the site in order to screen on site recreation areas from visible and physical access onto Tiedemar City c•,llector street. 4. Commission Discussion and Action A. Lewis moved that the decision on this item be delayed until after all of the public her.ring items had been heard. Barkhurst seconded. Ball asked if the City Page 8 - PC Minutes - June 190 1973 • • Attorney would be present later when thess items would be considered.. The City Attorney replied. that he would. The motion Was put to a vote and passed 5 to 1, Ball voting no. B. When this item was considered later in the evening the question of Fasano was again raised as with the preceeding Arrow Heating application. Ball asked Fred Anderson if the same problem would not exist in this ease and he replied that there is no difference in degree between the two cases. C. Barkhurst moved that the ites be continued to the next hearing to allow the applicant to familiarize himself with the requirements of Fasano. Ball seconded and the motion ;passed unanimously. 6.1 Variance V 2=73 (City of Tigard) An application by the City of Tigard to vary a side yard setback requirement of 20 feet to 16 feet for a proposed office-shop builds..: at the Tigard. City Shops located on Ash Str°ee& 250 feet southwest of S.W. Burnham. 1. Staff Findings A. The staff presented the following list of five findings: 1. That the proposed use conforms with the comprehensive plan. 2. Exceptional circumstances ,:, ise from the f...ct that this land is owned by the public and the City wishes to utilize the site to provide minimum efficiency per tax dollar invested. 3. The request preserves property rights of the public to use this site in accordance with the public need while not interfering with the rights of surrounding property owners. 4. The authorization of this variance will not be materially deetrimenntal to the purposes of the zoning ordinance or other property in this zone. 5. This request is for four feet, the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. Page 9 - PC Minutes - June 19, 1973 1 C 2. Public Hearing A. O,p.tnnennt 1. AO one appeared in opposition to the request. P. Proponents 1. Nick Hiebert of the City of Tigard Public Service and Facilities department appeared to speak in favor of the request. He stated the need for the facility be sed upon existing City spy ee needs and stressed the financial situation which the City is working under in attempting to alliew;te its space needs. C. Staff Recommendations 1. The staff recommended that the request be approved with the condition that the landso—pe plan which is sub;r fitted to the Planning Commission, recognize probe ms resulting from the reduced setback :rea. 3 Commission �gDiscussion ]�a and Action be allowed ®y� the . Ball moved that the V ar14 iance. �Ne allo W ed and tarn staff findings be adopted with the exception that finding number two be deleted.. In addition that the Commission finds that granting of the v.rir nnce will not sdbstantially or materially vary the character of the locality. That there is uncontradicted evince that denial of the variance mould impose an economic hardship upon the City. P. The motion was seconded by Nicola who stated that he mould like to see the 16 foot area landscaped and not used for storage. C. Chairman Whittaker said that this could be handled as part of the site development review procedure. P. The motion was put to a vote which resulted in a two to two tie and as result died, The roll call was Ball yes, Nicoll yes, Part hihurst no, Hartman no, Levis and Chairman Whittaker abstaining. E. The motion filed and no new motion was made. Page 10 - PC Minutes June 19, 1973 In F. Chairman Whittaker explained his absteinance explaining that "He s.w• no reason for denying t;,;w variance but felt the underlying purposes are not consistent with pro eJr planning.00 Mk. Lewis e pl ;fined his Abstainance saying that he personally could not see that a severage tre:tmernt plant was a proper place for a City office building. He did agree te,t it was ,. proper location for the shop building but not an office building. 7. SITE DEVEIOPMEN.t! PLAN REVIEW A. Tigard. Industrial Park = Phase II 1. Staff Recommendation a. The staff recommended approval of the site c;nd landscaping plan 'with two conditions pertaining primarily to the number and location of trees on the site. 2. Commission Discussion and Action a. The applicant Robert Gary's—vas present and discussed his plans with the Commission. ,'ee Commission questioned him about compliance with the previous requir'ei.ennts of his conditional use permit for the Tigard Industrial Park. Mr. Gray stated that he •Ks not yet complied with • all of the conditions but is in the process of doing so. b. Ball asked the City Planner if the applicant now has • a 'building permit. Mr. Brooks stated yes tA4't the applicant • has been issued a building permit. Chairman a ttaker t' n pointed out that one of the conditions of the original conditional use was that a buildi4 . permit not be issued until site plan be approved by the Planning Commission. c. Mtr. Brooks acknowledged this fact but stated that since this condition was imposed the City has adopted ane occupancy permit ordinance which he felt you'd, insure that all of necessary site an and conditions could be met in that the developer could be denied occupancy of the building once constructed. Chairman Whittaker said that another condition of the approval.was that a dedication of easement for greenway along Fenno Creek would be considered a phase II of this project. He . asked the Commission, in that phase II is now before the Planning Cotmnissian- should they now be considering the dedication of the,greenvay? Page 11 • PC Minutes o June 19, 1973 . . , . . . . . . . , • . , . . . . . : . . (4... (..,' - . 4 4! d. Barkhurst moved to approve the site plan with (:,,.. the staff's recommended conditions and with the V. additional requirement that the applicant post a and for the amount of the landscaping to be installed. This motion as seconded by Lewis and amended by Ball to consider the subject of greenway dedication '4..t the next Planning Commission study session with the applicant present. Barkhurst seconded and the notion passed s amended with t unanimous vote. B. Utility Equipment Company 1. Staff Recommendations r a. The staff recommended approval of „„as submitted site and landscaping plan with the following conditions: 44. I.1 r!. lo That the applie,..Int shall provide (for Planning ..., ,. Commission staff tppreval) an irrigation plan or p 14, other such tssnrance that water is available to landscaped areas during periods of drou)ht. P 2. Applicant shall not remove additional trees with d out approval from the Planning staff. '..; (:: 2. Commission Discussion and. Action a. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the site plan adding a third condition that no Aditional access 'be provided to Hunalker than shown on the site plan. C. Travers & Johnston - Office Park 1. Staff Becommendatiot a. The staff recommended tpprovtl of the submitted site plan with the following conditions: i. 4 1. The Department of Public Services and. Facilities , I Shall review and pprove the site plan for conformance with City utility and access standards. I. . ( 2. Applicant &mil provide the Planning Department staff f with a detailed landscape plan meeting the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.58 of the Tigard Municipal Code. This revised lardscape plan shall be reviemed and approved by the Planning, Department staff. 1 '.. (:,. ' Page 12 - PC Minutes - June 11::::------.........m..............mommillemomerrimememileie __ ..... 3. Applicant shall also provide the Planning Dep=r°tment staff with an irria tion plan or other such assur&nce that water is available to the landscaped areas during periods *f drought. Such assurance shall be approved by the Planning Department staff. 4. No building permit shhall be issued until the applicant meets the standards set forth in Chapter 18.58 of the Tigard Municipal Code. 2. Commission Discussion c:.nd Action a. After considerr.'hle discussion with the applicant Parkhurst moved to approvs the site plan with the fifths condition that six foot sidewalks be provided in place of the more narrow one's show *n the site plan. The Commission approved with a siu.,us vote. D. New Junior High Sal 1. Staff Recomm n. .tions a. The staff recommended approval of the site and landscaping ( plan as submitted by the applicant. 2. Commission Discussion ;t1c1. action Hartman moved to accept the plan as submitted and Ball seconded. The Plan was approved by a unanimous vote, E. Clarke industries = Curl Acres 1. Staff Recommendations endations a. The staff recommended =.pproval of the site and landscaping plans c=;s submitted. 2. Commission Discussion and Action a. Harrtman moved to accept the plan as submitted and Lewis seconded. The vote was unanimous. P. Hyster - Outdoor Storage 1. Discussion a. T e Planning Director showed the Commission a plan submitted by Hyster Sales Corp. on Sandburg Street for a proposed expansion of their new facility there. He explained that the company did not expect an answer at this time but was interested in the Commission's reaction to their expansion ideas. Page 13 - PC Minutes - June 19, 1973 • `. , • b. Discussion centered around the effects of expansion on their landscape plan and negative impacts upon the neighboring property owners. • c Chairman Whittaker instructed the Planning Staff to check the zoning restrictions on this portion of the property. G. Byers Photo 1. Discussion a. The applicant requested preliminary site plan approval • from the Planning Commission for a parking configuration which would put some parking in a required landscaping area but provide compensating; ensating landscapin ;. b. The staff recommended approval of the proposal. c. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the preliminary site plan. H. Sudlow Duplexes 1. Discussion a. The applicant request preliminary site plan aph;;r oYl from t he Planning Commi sion for the parking configuration of the proposed deval p n . b. The staff aff stated that they had worked closely with the applicant and recommended approval of the submitted configuration. c. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the preliminary site plan. 1. Tigard Medical Clinic 1. Discussion a. The applicant requested preliminary site plan approval from the Planning Commission before embarking on a detailed landscaped plan. b. The staff stated that the submitted plan excellently addresses the problems of access and parking inherent at the intersection of Pacific Highway and Grreen.burg and recommended Planning Commission approval of the concept. Page 14 Q PC Minutes - Jane 19, 1973 41111•11•1=111 11 c. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the preliminary site plan ir concept. 8. ADJOURNMENT: A. The meeting vas adjourned 4t 312,445 ILL 111 (1 (: 1 Page 15 - PC Minutes - Jima 19, 1973 � fhy, - — -. _btb" Y1 i:,y 1+_ tc• � ,�i t,f h +yet ' r'9' b.' " ri nk TO: Planning Commission F FROM: Planning Commission Staff DATE: June 15, 1973 SUBJECT: Lindquist P-D - rehearing The Planning Commission staff has reviewed the request by S. H. Lindquist to rehear and consider an extension of his existing P-D zoning on property located on the east side of Hal]. Boulevard 300 feet south of Bonita Road, comprising 7.61 acres. Although no substantial progress has been made toward construction of the proposed Planned Development, the proposal remains in conformance with Tigard's adopted comprehensive plan and fulfills a community need for additional housing in a pleasant urban ?; • environment. The Planning Commission and City Council,in previous action approved a list of fourteen conditions with their prior approval to Mr. Lindquist's P-:D. Staff has reviewed these conditions and have revised them as follows: 1. The total number of dwelling units shall be no more than 36 including no more than 5 duplexes to be located only on lots abutting Hall Blvd. s4 2. That the normal front, side and rear setbacks may be waived, except the rear setbacks along the perimeter lot lines of each plat shall be a minimum of 15 feet, and provided that :,' each dwelling unit shall have at least one yard of 20 feet 1' or more and the platens to be approved by the Planning Department. t; 3. That all utilities shall be undergound. 4. That the developer dedicate to the City of Tigard a park located in the central area of the Planned Development i ! surrounded by the central access road. Said park to be I,' landscape, irrigated and equiped with play equipment. Design of this perk facility to be approved by the Planning I Department. 5. That landscaping plans showing sizes, locations and types of trees and plant materials for the Hell. Boulevard frontage 4 be approved by the Planning Department. That earth berm r;. be constructed along the frontage of Hall Boulevard having ,: a minimum height of 3 feet to be located at least 10 feet from the existing right-of-way of Hall Boulevard. • 6. That the developer agree to construct a 6 foot wide• bicyle/pedestrian p►tkn yin the right-of!.way along !all Boulevard. The con n< struction and desigof this •facility shall be approved by the Oregon State Hi=ghway Department. 7. That the developer provide curb side sidewalks on both • sides of the easterly and southerly entry roads into the • subdivision and on the- outside of the circle road within the subdivision, . No sidewalks shall be required in the cul-de-sac"areas of the subdivision. • 6. That duplexes and single family dwellings may have common walls, plans to be approved by the Planning Department. ' • 9. That 10 feet be dedicated to the City along the frontage of d Hall Boulevard for future street improvements ana that individual lots shall not have direct access to Hall Boulevard. , 10. That engineering plans and specifications shall be approved prior to the acceptance of the final plat. That the preliminary ." plat shall be identified as such, dated and have a north point. 11. That the scale of the preliminary plat shell be revised to • • show surrounding subdivision and their lot patterns. • • 12. That all streets shall be named and easement shown on the preliminary plat. 13. That traffic in the circular central street be one way running counter clock wise. 14. That on street parking shall be allowed only on the outside perimeter of the circular street. Recommendation • Staff recommends that the Lindquist P-D be referred to the City Council with the recommendation that the Lindquist Planned Development be extended and attaching the aforementioned conditions. Page 2 - Staff Report - Lindquist - rune 19, 1973 •Qyh* t1 4 kA- r • . �. t , t, fqi .Y•�a 5i.. '. ..: �It'^i.� �ji r ___ - - _.___ __.. ___. .r i.. , r • i .< BON/TA ROAD 1 /". ' ''.1' - C 5 ., ,., .. Via. • . t..,),„ ,........_y .f ,J Gu = 3� • STREET \. iro Ai f ■a si 1 i 1 \\A\t.\411 11 I 1.,, bfSk\k\4/1t#iS\%.\*1.1%1, ' . 0,,' 1. a • h N S.W. ROSS STREET N ZONE CHANGE . oho► ' of consk ratio n 1 ; R7 to ,'" sails ' 200' L ''',„;,;,,T,i,,,,...,-f..",4,7',..,TiWi.' t1P--'''.''. ' - .` - ' '-'''''' ' ^} w i 4 G> d -.,:-,.1( ' ''' ' ,.., `: Tigard Planning Commission Staff Report : June 19, 1973 `, CU 13-73 P V . ' Conditional Use For property located north of Walnut Street and 400 feet ' east of S W. 121st, adjacent the Brookway Subdivision. ApPlic not . Arrow Heating Company licant's Re uest f Conditional Use approval to allow a Planned Residential Development in an R-15 zone. i Applicant's Proposal To subdivide the subject 9.77 acre tract into 11 buildable lots, 10 lots for single family homes and. 1 lot containing 16 duplexes for a total of 26 dwelling units. A site and landscaping plan of the duplex area has been submitted by the applicant. 1 1 Existing Conditions: 4 Surrounding Land Use: ' i - A residential subdivi sion exists to the west, forested land to the north ana south and scattered residential and agricultural uses to the east. ; r. Surrounding zoning: ` I ■R-7 zoning exists adjacent the south and west 'sides of the site. Suburban Residential zoning exists adjacent the north and northeastern portion of the site. A duplex conditional use was approved on the t, south side of Walnut, adjacent the E ub ject site, last, ,ipril. Access: Public access to the site is provided by 580 feet of frontage 1 age on S.W. Walnut Street and 570 feet of frontage on S.W. 124th 1 Avenue. The northerly portion of the site is adjacent an unnamed creek indicated on the Tigard Coaoounity Plan es 'e . - i potential greenway area. , , r ., , r• v. .mr r ?k ?,.. .,- . ? '. i e, 1t / s i ei F43' . t, i r� }) Utilities: { 1 i Water is available from the Tigard Water District and sewer `" service from the Unified Seweage agency. Conformance with the Tigard Community Plan and Zoning Ordinance The subject site is designated "Urban Low Density Residential" having a maximum density of 4 dwelling units per gross acre. The applicant proposes a density of 2.7 units per gross acre. Zoning on the subject property is R-l5 allowing the development of 28 dwelling units. The applicant proposes 26 dwelling units. Staff Findings: 1. The applicant's proposal conforms with the Tigard. Community Plan. 2. The applicant's proposed density conforms to the requirements of the Cit y �►of Tigard Zoning Ordinance. n8 3. The applicants property is not suitable for the continuation of the City's proposed greenway system as an existing dedicated right-of-way exists 800 feet to the west. A continuation of the greenway system through the applicants property would (, duplicate an existing facility and provide the possibility of potential use conflicts between the public and private landowners within the proposed. development. The terminus of the proposed route through applicants property and the route to the west is in approximately the same general. location. The staff finds a greenway route through the applicant' s property an unnecessary duplication of facilities. , 4. The applicant proposed a 4O foot easement to provide access to lots 8, 9 and 10 on the easterly portion of the site. The staff finds this acceptable. 5. The pond and dam are to be maintained by_,a homeowners ,association. 6. The applicant wishes to maintain ownership of lots 5, 6 and 7 and Tract "B". 7. Tract A is to be dedicated to the city of Tigard for its greenway system. 1 8. The cul-de-sac on the easterly portion of the site is to 1 be dedicated and built to city standards. 9. The applicant proposes to underground all utilities. Page 2 Staff Report - Arrow Heating - June 19, 1973 1 ,� re • 77717777 77. ;t • • i-� • st 10. No development should occur on Tract "B" in the interest of future public health and safety. This is due to potential • flood hazard. 11. ,Adequate public access and utilities are adjacent or otherwise serve the site. 12. The applicant proposes to further subdivide lot 1 of the proposed development so'as to place each duplex on a single • lot. Staff finds insufficient information has been provided concerning the further subdivision on lot 1 and that this further subdivision will affect the future responsibility and maintenance for the proposed landscaping and access areas. Recommendations Based on the above descriptions and findings, it is recommended the applicant's request be approved with the following conditions. 1. A homeowners Association (s) shall be formed to maintain the dam, lake, 10 feet of lake frontage and the duplex landscape and access areas. Tract "B" shall revert to the ownership of the Homeowners Association upon the sale of either lot 6 or 7 as indicated oe the preliminary plat A 2. The applicant shall cause a deed restriction to be placed on Tract "B", so preventing any future residential development in the interest of the future public health and safety. This restriction not to preclude said tract's use for agriculture, grading and necessary structures to carry out these uses. 3. The applicant shall dedicate to the City sufficient land to provide a 30 foot right-of-way width from the center line of Walnut Street. 4. The duplex property owner (a) shall agree to support the formation of a local improvement district to bring S.W. Walnut Street up to City collector street standards and that the present property owner (s) shall execute a recordable covenant herewith. 5. All lots for single,family dwellings shall cover a minimum land area of 15,000 square feet. 6. The site and landscaping plans of the duplex area shall be approved by the planning commission. Page 3 Staff Report June,Arrow Heating - Ju , 19, 1973 • ...i'.' ,::C. o, a. 7 i 'i,t Yk'� g•a m ,,ipi • • • ti"+t x4 4 a ? `"`• 7. Before a building permit shall be issued for construction of duplex units on the subject site, the applicant shall 6 submit and the Planning Commission shall approve, a preliminary subdivision plat of lot 1 and a program for common maintenance of access ways and landscaped areas. 8. All utilities shall be placed underground. • 9. The cul-de-sac and street on the southeastern corner of the site shall be dedicated to the City and constructed to City standards. • • • • • r:. Page 4 - Staff Report - Arrow Heating - .» 19, 1973 iw!r".'.. , m•rl�F�'r"y'lA-7. ^JSW w r7 R'tMlR1t�.^'tr/x• ,,-.•try,,, . �. , :<y.,. .R K..t.•. . {L ; . 77•t. i jib Tigard Planning Commiss'?.un , Staff Report "9June 19, 1973 Item CU 12-73 ii Conditional Use For property fronting onto S.W. Tiedeman4treet and designated as tax lot b00 on tax mop 291 3M. The lots under consideration are numbers 1, 22, 23, and 24 in the proposed Clydesdale Subdivision. This subdivision is not recorded at this time. However the applicant is in the process of having the final plat approved. Applicant • S. N. S. Development Corporation , plicant's Request J' Conditional. Use approval to allow the cottruction of four , (r,,-, duplexes for a total of eight dwelling units in the R-7, single family residential zone. Location and Land Use of Subject Property ( The property is located on S.W. Tiedemandirectly across the street from the Junior High School construction site. The property is presently vacant, the house which did occupy the site being recently demolished. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use The surrounding zoning is R-7, single f y residential. The adjacent land use consists of single family homes and vacant land and a junior high school being constructed across Tiedeman. • Staff Findings The staff finds that; 1. The subject property is designated for urban low density residential development. The total subdivision area of 6.75 acres which will permit 'a total of 27 dwelling units at the planed density of four units per acre. . The subdivision nor has 24 building :lots. and the additional four units beinti , giieai would result in 28 units on the site, exceeding the density requirements by one unit. i • ice,,.;' , r+ tis.��w rrMcr.Ssi�S+Tmr .,�r.�%.-�^titr�rnar> .nxer,. �«-,• req;:-.:�, • 2. Two of the four proposed lots are at the entrance to the subdivision off Tiedeman. The remaining tWO lots gain access from a cul-de-sac within the subdivision. 3. When this property is subdivided .10 feet of right-of-Way will be dedicated on Tiedeman and money deposited for =_I its improvement. Staff Recommendation The staff recommends approval of the request stipulating the following conditions: 1. That approval be granted for the construction of tW0 duplexes at the entrance of the subdivision on lots 1 and 24 in Clydesdale. 2. That said approval be contingent upon the recording of the final plat for the Clydesdale subdivision and that lot 1 and 24 meet the minimum lot size requirement of 8,000 square feet when recorded. 3. That the submitted site plan be concerned with fencing the site in order to screen on site recreation areas from visible and physical access onto Tiedeman a City collector street. a` Page 2 Staff Report • S.N.S. • JW a 19, 1973 • K r 1A o ?' ''':;'''''..'''''''''''' . '‘, , . . , ,,,,/k,, - , 0 ,, j E{ /:. iF i ,' ) ;f J u eft 3.a .' ti .� 41 ¢I I( 't ,. !o 9 ►s $ , . Ciby 13ourI.elory t. c.f • G k'; tI ` j i/ ,., c,, W, WQint ohnsor N � r Asls11.111s! ki�} sno',1:( f• 1n 4�= i. $ .{ o 4 ,; •;, „, Tigard Planning Commission Staff Report c;,lll June 19, 1973 Item V 2-73 Variance For property designated as tax lot 3000 on tax map 2S1 2AD Applicant City of Tigard Applicant's Request The of a v ari anae to allow the construction of granting a combination shop■oftioe building, 16 feet from the side lot line where 20 feet is required. The total variance request is therefore for four feet. Location and, Land Use of Bub ect Pra*rty The property is located on Ash Avenue 250 feet southwest of Burnham Street. It is.aoecupied by the Tigard Sewerage Treatment Plant and Tigard City Shops. • ourrowxiing Zoning and Land Use The surrounding property is Boned M-40 Industrial Park, except the property across Fenno Creek to the southwest which is zoned A-2, Multiple icy. The surrounding uses are primarily industrial with the exception of two houses on Ash between the site and Burnham Street and an apartment house across Fenno Creek on Ash. Staff Find ngs The staff finds that: 1. The proposed use conforms with the comprehensive plan. 2. Exceptional circumstances arise from the fact that this land is owned by the public and the City wishes to utilize 4 the site to provide maximum efficiency per tax dollar invested. 3. The request preserves property rights>-of-the public to use this site in accordance,with the public need while not • • • interfering with the rights of surrounding property owners. 4. The authorization of this variance will not be materially 1 detrimental to the purposes of the zoning ordinance or other property in this zone. • 5. This request is for four feet, the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. Staff Recommendation The staff recommends that the request be approved with the condition that the landscape plan which is submitted to the Planning Commission recognize problems resulting from the reduced setback area. y { qk • 4 F 1 Page 2 - Staff Report - City of Tigard - June 19, 1973 r • } • ',4 f `.a ,'i.17, ' / ..5`), '' 1 Fa j tl . J (•/Z____,,,„ .-------- ._ I,. / _____.- --------- ��_ -- ,, -- ___ [,, �. ____ A r1 .'.y, {a A: TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report - Site Design Review June 19, 1973 8.1 Arrow Heating - Planned Residential Staff recommends approval of the site and landscaping plans with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a landscape maintenance program, identifying those parties responsible for the future maintenance of the landscaping and the legal vehicle proposed to assur future maintenance responsibility. The Planning Commission staff shall approve this arrangement. 2. The applicant shall submit an irrigation plan or other such plan assuring that water will be available to the landscaped areas during periods of drought. This plan shall be approved by the Planning Commission Staff. 3. The applicant shall agree to construct an architecturally pleasing fence on the south end of the lake, preventing public access to the Lake from Walnut Street. The design and location of said fence shall be approved by the Planning Commission Staff. 8.2 Tigard Industrial Park - Phase II Staff Recommends approval of the site and landscaping plans with the following conditions: 1. The row of Liqudamber Stryaciflur trees on the northern side of the proposed building be extended. around the western Y1 end of the building to a point 30 feet south of the southern edge of the proposed building. Ground cover, shrubs and proposed trees shall be rearranged accordingly on a new landscape plan to be submitted to the Planning Commission staff for approval 2. Trees shall be placed along the westerly side of the existing building of the same species as existing p ng and. at the same spacing as indicated for the proposed landscaping ' (30' on center). This landscaping shall be indicated on , the revised landscape plan to be submitted to the Planning , • Commission Staff for approval. F 8.7 Hyster Discussion only 8.8 Byers Photo Discussion only 8.9 Sudlow Duplexes is Applicant is requesting the Planning Commission approve the parking configuration of the proposed development. Staff has worked closely with the applicant on this proposal and recommends approval of the submitted configuration. 8.10 Tigard Medical Clinic - New Request Applicant for Site Development Plan Review requests approval of site plan concept before embarking on a detailed landscape plan. Staff feels the submitted site plan excellently addresses the problems of access and parking inherent at the intersection of Pacific Highway and Greenburg Road. Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of the concept. ".....--,..."-"•••• 1 , _ ), 1 i 1 i, 4: Staff Report - Minor Land Partitioning P l' 1: 1, i 9.1 Brown Property , Request to partition two lots on the northwest corner of , , the intersection of S.W. 115th and S.W. North Dakota Streets. , ' Staff feels the straightening of the curve existing at this intersection should be studied by the Department of Public , Facilities and Services, before any action can be taken on this request. A request has been made to the aforementioned i Department for such a study. Staff will report these findings , at the July 3rd Planning Commission meeting and recommend a course of action. ) i , i Staff recommends tabling this item to the JUly 3rd meeting. ki 9.2 Finley Property ' Request to partition a lot from the rear portion of a narrow, rectangular piece of property; directly east of the intersection i k.„. of Hall Boulevard and McDonald Street. The applicants proposal v is to provide access to this lot by means of a 20' easement from Hall Boulevard. ;t , Staff feels this proposal would prevent efficient land use t, in an area zoned R-7 and indicated for Urban Medium Density , use in the Tigard Community Plan. i Staff recommends tabling this item until July 3rd pending additional study of existing and future lotting patterns. 0 z, Staff.Report - Miscellaneous Items - ' 10.1 Bonita Class - Zoning Ordinance Interpretation , , P ' 1" The City presently has a request by Bonita Glass to locate , , in the M-4 Industrial zone on Burnham Street. , )1 The business includes the storage of glass for sale and r: , installation in aluminum frames and automobiles. 1 i . This use is not specifically mentioned in the zoning ordinance, v I, ( but the staff finds it similar in nature to permitted uses in the M-4 zone which includes various types of assembly, manufacturing - and including plastics molding. fi 1; i The staff therefore recommends that the requested use be declared similar by the planning Commission. y