Planning Commission Packet - 12/19/1972 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
AGENDA
Tigard Planning Commission
Regular Meeting ® December 19, 1972
Member Section ® 7030 P.M.
Public Hearing ® 8000 P.M.
Twality Jr. High School lecture room
14650 S.W. 97th0 Tigard9Oregon
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular meeting of November 219 1972
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Zone Change (2C 5®729"Summerfield")
CITY OF TIGARD, Applicant
requesa change of zone classification from
County P-R, Planned Residential to City P-D, Planned
Development for parcels located on the north side of
S.W. Durham Road and east side of S.W. Pacific
Highway (tax lots 11009 13029 1303, 13019 2000, 1900, -'
1901, 1902 and 1400 on tax map 2S1 10D; tax lots 9009
1000, 1100, 1900, 1600, 1700, 2000 and 2600 on tax
map 2S1 11C; and tax lots 900 and 1500 on tax map
2S1 11D)
1. Staff Recommendation
2. Public Hearing
3. ' Commission Discussion and Action
V. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
A. Robert Cooper Apt. project south of Canterbury Lane
1. Subcommittee Action: Approved 0
2. Commission Discussion and Action
B. Earl Reid office expansion on Main Street
1. Subcommittee Actions Approval of building location
2. Commission Discussion and Action
{T,
7k
2
•
ti•.
VI0 SUBDIVISIONS AND MINOR LAND PARTITIONS
....;,
A. "Summerfield" No. 1
VII. DEDICATIONS
VIII. OTHER ITEMS
IX. ADJOURNMENT c,
'
PAGE 2 - PC AGENDA - DECEMBER 19, 1972
•
0lesd
MINUTES
° Tigard Planning Commission
Regular Meeting December 19, 1972
Twality Jr. High School Lecture Room
14650 S.W. 97th, Tigard, Oregon
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. The meeting was called to order at 8:00 R.M.
I1 ROLL CALL
Am Present: Commissioners Bail, Barkhurst, Hartman, Lewis,
Nicoll, Patersong Chairman Whittaker City
Planner Rangila? City Attorney Anderson.
Bo Absent: Commissioner Severson
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Mr. Whittaker stated that the minutes for the regular
meeting of November 21, 1972 indicating the Planning
Commission action on Public Hearing Item tl0C0° should
be corrected to read as follows: °01t was moved (Lewis) ,
seconded (Hartman) and passed by a 4 to 1 vote
(Whittaker voting No) of the Planning Commission present
to approve the request with the following conditions:--
Bo Minutes were approved as corrected by unanimous vote of
the Commission present.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Zone Change (ZC 5-72, °°Summerfield°°)
CITY OF TIGARD, applicant
A request for a change of zone classification from
County P R, Planned Residential to City P-D, Planned
Development for parcels located on the north side of
S.W. Durham Road and east side of S.W. Pacific Highway
(tax lots 1100, 1302, 1303, 1301, 2000, 1900, 1901, 1902,
and 1400 on tax map 251 l0Do tax lots 900, 1000, 1100,
1900, 1600, 1700, 2000 and 2600 on tax map 2S1 11C;
and tax lots 900 and 1500 on tax map 2S1 11D)
1e Staff Recommendation
ao The staff recommended approval of the zone change
with conditions.
Ailmo
2 Public Hearing •
ao Mrs. Peck, S.W. Naeve Street, asked if the extra
right-of-way requirement along Naeve Street would
involve her property.
bo Mr. Whittaker said the street improvements and
right-of-way dedications would only involve the
property under the .-Da Planned Development zoning.
Co Mro Peck asked about the plans for S.W. 109th Avenue
and the difference between the P-R and P-D zones.
do The City Planner reviewed the preliminary site plane
which showed a realignment of 109th Avenue, south
of Naeve Street.
ea Mr. Marshall, Tualatin Development Company, said a
public hearing would be required to vacate an
p 9 q any
portion of S.W. 109th Avenue.
f. Mr. Whittaker explained that the P®R+ and P°°D zones
were similar in respect to allowing planned residential
developments, and that the County had no PWD zone
and the City had no P-R zone.
go Mr. Barkhurst explained that the P-D zone required
more Planning Commission involvement and review and
gave the developer more flexibility in design.
h. Mr. Whittaker added that the P-D zone created mere
open space and public recreational area than
would result from standard subdivision practices
and provided a variety of housing types to the
public.
io Mr. Schockeita S.W. 150th Avenue, expressed concern
for traffic along 99W, public transportation and asked
about the status of the originally proposed 3 to 5
story apartment houses.
j0 Mr. Whittaker explained the project°s phasing process,..:
which was planned to take at least 5 years to complete.
ko Mr. Paterson said that CRAG, the State Highway Dept.
and the City of Tigard were all involved in planning
to improve the traffic situations on 99W0 He also
stated that the City Council° s number one priority
problem was 99Wo
Page 2 - PC Minutes - December 19, 1972
9
to Mr. Marshall said Tri-Met made 17 trips per day into
King City and that apartment houses would be limited
to height requirements within the City's A-2 zone.
me The City Planner explained that the maximum allowable
building height for apartment housing would be 2
stories.
no The public hearing was closed.
30 Commission Discussion and Action
ao It was moved (Lewis) and seconded (Barkhtwst) and
passed by unanimous vote of the Commission present
to approve the zone change with staff findings •
and the following conditions t
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permit within
the development, a site plan of the entire
development setting forth the site development
standards shall be submitted to the Planning
Commission for review and approval. This plan
shall include but not be limited to landscaping,
setbacks, building heights, signs, streets®
proposed improvements, sidewalks, curbs o gutters,
parking, service and storage areas.
r2-) All land within the development shall be used for
residential and recreational purposes, except that
the area designated for commercial uses on the site
plan may include service and/or professional
office uses serving the development, If such
uses are approved, the Planning Commission shall
approve the location, access, siting and range of
permitted uses.
3. Each phase of the development shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Commission, At the
time of approval of each phase, the densities
and uses shall be approved.
4. A boat and trailer storage area shall be designated
in an area contained by an opaque fence or sight
obscuring landscape screening maintained at not less
than six (6) feet nor more than seven (7) feet in
height.
5. The apartments in the project shall be developed
in accordance with Amt standards unless otherwise
approved on a specific site plan by the Planning
Cemmissiono
Page 3 - PC Minutes ® December 199 1972
•
6. The overall density of the development shall be no'
greater than 6.25 dwelling units per ,acre`; (1250
total units) with a total population not to exceed
2400 persons.
ri
7. The setbacks and lot sizes as proposed for single
family units shall be approved unless otherwise
specified by the Planning Commission, except that
there shall be a ten (10) foot minimum yard
requirement where any yard abuts a public street.
8. Approval of any lots to be subdivided shall be
through the Subdivision Ordinance procedures.
9. Open space shall be maintained through a Homeowners
Association or by the developers with convenants
submitted for approval at the filing of the final F
plat.
10. All utilities shall be subsurface installations.
11. Housing shall be limited to an average density of ;,
no more than 1.92 persons per dwelling unit. ''
12. Excluded parcels surrounded by °°Summerfield°° shall
be included in the site plan with the possibility
of access provided these parcels to eliminate
their isolation.
13. There shall be dedication to 45 feet from center-
line on S.W. Durham. Road.
14. There shall be dedication of 35 feet from center-
line with a 40 foot improvement provided on S,W. s
98th where the development abuts both sides of
the road and a half street improvement where the {
development abuts only one side of the road.
15. There shall be dedication of 25 feet from center-
line (32 feet improvement) on S.W. Naeve Street
with half street improvement where applicable. t
16. There shall be dedication of 30 feet, from center-
, line on S.W. Settler (36 feet improvement) with
half street improvement where applicable.
17. Internal street improvements will be designated at
the time of the platting of the subdivisi•n.
18. There shall be no occupancy without public water
and sewer.
Page 4 - PC Minutes - December 19, 1972
T
19. A copy of the deed restrictions and covenants shall
be attached to the approved plan to help insure
conformity with planned densities.
20, Phase II of the development shall not be approved
until additional water service is available to
the Tigard Water District from the City of
Portland and/or City of Lake Oswego.
V. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
A. Robert Cooper Apartment project south of Canterbury Lane.
to Subcommittee Actions Approved {{
2. Commission Discussion and Action
a. It was moved (Barkhurst.) , seconded (Lewis) and
passed by unanimous vote of the Comtui:=sio.n present
to approve the site development plan.
B. Earl Reid office expansion on. Main Street.
1. Previous Commission Actions Approved building location.
2. Commission Actions
a. It was moved (Lewis) , seconded (Ball) and passed
by a 6 1, 0 vote (Barkhurst abstaining) to table action
on the proposed site development plan until
alternative building additions are considered m to
promote maximum possible utilization of existing
trees on the site, and particularly to encourage
more attractive treatment of landscaping along Main
Street.
fa
C. Commercial Street Warehouse
1. Subcommittee Actions To table action until City Council
reviews plans.
2. Commission Action: N
a. It was moved, seconded and passed by a 6 - 0
vote (Whittaker abstaining) to deny the site
development plan because of the concern for
extending Ash Street from Commercial Street to
Burnham Street.
VI. SUBDIVISIONS AND MINOR LAND PARTITIONS
A. 'BSunanerfield'° No. 1.
Page 5 m PC Minutes o December 19, 1972
}
•
1. The Staff recommended approval with conditions.
a.R
2. Commission Discussion and Action.
a. Mr. Lewis asked when public sewer and water would be
available to the subdivision.
b. Mr. Marshall said he hoped the Department of Envircm
mental Quality would approve the King City treatment
plant expansion within 60 to 120 days. He said the
requested 5 model homes would be completed in about
120 days. He also said the Tigard Water District
had already approved service to a maximum of 50
dwelling units within the first subdivision.
c. The City Planner said that one of the conditions of
the P-D Planned Development zone change required
public sewer and water availability before occupancy.
d. It was moved (.Lewis) , seconded (Barkhurst) and
passed by a unanimous vote of the Commission present
to approve the preliminary plat with staff conditions:
1. That engineering plans and specifications shall
be approved prior to acceptance of the Final Plat.
"
2. p That all streets shall be named prior to acceptance
of the Final Plat.
3. That the Homeowners Association Agreement shall be
approved in form by the City Attorney, and shall
insure maintenance of all recreational facilities
and areas,
4. That the Drainage Study for the entire basin be
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department
prior to acceptance of the Final Plat.
5. That the Final Plat provide a plat restriction
against direct vehicular access onto S.W. Durham
Road, except for designated streets.
VII. DEDICATIONS
A. S.W. 76th Avenue
1. The staff recommended approval of the street dedication.
2. Commission Discussion and Action.
a. It was moved (Barkhurst) , seconded (Hartman) and
passed by unanimous vote of the Commission present
to approve the street dedication.
Page 6 - PC Minutes - December 19, 1972
VIII. OTHER ITEMS
IX ADJTOURNMENT: 8:50 P.M.
Page 7 - PC Minutes - December. 19, 1972
•
•
114'4..4.`Q,':''HY CT r rr
q Nk�p ja' ! a` t ',...%.'i:
J J{ M1i •1f u! V# ! ?.,a� yn AN'f i Ye +:11L4 .i9�, 14.. i•YE 4 M -R:;�.
, . }rs3 ry �Sar i 3 p a �{!�5 �v r . 't:...':.;., I
t 3 i t.
.. . i } i .i f 1 }:} ' e`er, V :4 Y�,r,,. `•�yf:' '.'r 1'' '},+`lid i..}q P.r1 SfbbPi t� r � (�`� gym,._•n A� -: S, }C r1szt;i1 i. .i ' $ .1, X441 i ttr.t4 6 l- to o ....rF ;d. 1 t 1;1i, .
$ tf x t`l f F t"�+1 1 t' ,f r ii ef7 Y d��`
:t5 Nl irs C�Sd {-Drf .. .4,< dP'rYJ,, Sly k4ra ,,,„gi`F'A , )1 , r k , t �; bk 4 dr y. { S 5:•t Y{f'i a {J it"s �' ,. f4 sM1l-., �� r _r' i '; f 1' I ice: �' ;j V„ft
:i- 0,,:.i 7 N + fil ap r} k 4i' i(Oj�k tr`I r �ygg 4 � �r ?� ; iA•
f -',? I Y' sfii , .. t, d 1 two y;l(4 S4.r 014 l(k,' 4 Ye. "'' J .... rittA,'. 'r4 4”--,.*' J '+t IA;iE: t' S dt1lq st .
y} $ C,M:i .134.6• i h i:411.'l1+'�`b11 .tip''t!"ti .i �'r ,A, 7`L'1 A'P'`+' iR f' l), a♦'1".n:/k,4 $ r4 fit' .k,•'-' i e (,{
F 3 �yy t T..i, i+t S 4^ -ry Ii;fT ,t�F 7$
y,1' � " df 5��n fGv�[e; '✓ ;��""� .: d;�; ,,y� h a u3�t ijT 1'!;�4J � �,t 1 F ,.i�, r� �� a t.����R k."+1"I�M1�f�Y't�t�i5�d.+r)' s !f ��J f
tt M t ,,, y,
d $ r y v , x ;'r; ;of 1, g �.r ? , x ,:'' ' p'y fj :rt to
-.',. 1`(& 74. s 1 Mpi r tR rl k:= t r It a Y,rrr xo•e
Tigard t �� 1 Coml�llsaion, l k
(h •1�fll4 f1.(•:. "max r, Staff Report 'fit{n7r Y,
Fez xt December 19 1972 f.4.'
Item ZC 5-72 , alp r.
to faR'< + }� ,,lr'. ''
} M
� e one F
1 J t `.:.4,-{Will•
For property designated as tax lots 1100, 1502, 1303, :�,,
1301, 2000, 1900, 1901, 1902 and 1400 on tax asp '
281 10D; tax lots 900, 1000 1100, 1900, 1600, 1700, •
2000 and 2600 on tax nap 282 11C; and tax lots 900 ry tr.
and 1500 on tax asap 281 11D. 1
f w,
,.4
Applicant n
City of Tigard
1'
4fi
Applicants, Reoues t
Approval of a change of none classification from County a,
designated P-R, Played Residential to City P--D, Ple000 d
.° Development.
1
L otion and Land Use of fib iarst 1,+, + 4
The subject property, with golf fairways and greens •almost completed, is located slOng the north side of • ',.
8.M. Durham Road and oast side of 8.117. Paci.ftc Him.
•
It comprises' en area of a rmato tely f�`
Sunda# Zon iaa and SU N .
• The area surrounding the submit to tdM o._ yi!
east and south is *mood R-7, Si i ur 7 ,,
and developed with scattered single T4t...
p iodic oral X11 >�
and agricultural uses. �T'°I
I
Staff Finding and Recd ndat
ri'l''
l
The staff finds that:
N ,. 1. The «subject property is designated for Urban Low
. Density Residential development within the Tgardd
Community Plan. This category allows residential
',
densities of up to 4 dwelling ";
units or 12 persons
per gross residential acre. A �sy (,
1
•
�1 r
r 4.m+xrnin :t,,e .m, .,.,,:. ..
','fs q. rj` •,1 i i t- ' t t..P y D) ry •,, •, .,,. t e,v1w, A4,B -%%FPn°r'il%,�} ,` "- ,..•,Y '.. 4 A j Nd ,i1. A'`' 'ill', 1` , p.1 R �! 74�'l1 f V•'�' �a l �{�.i�� � I �� 4 �S `1 !'�. �� �1i 9�,�.GC ,j % � r � l '‘..19 � r� � �kf�4 f f1+�s t � #,,,,171::',4) .��''
S l.�r(G - ,.,,,,,i;‘,0 7 :II', 1. �'F Y: I 1 4f ,d�m`4
nC I�1lt % e ..'1,' ;14:;:',:-.;?...4.%.
4�Ik a}ya Id %'1 •t'F
r I�'M1S�lx`� 4y '�`{+ a ..4= /, ti L ,)+ (.
,iIFS, . Vj i Q ,a ,i 3 0; -x ttr Y I f .,AS S Y r ,
r
� 1rai' iy1 `2 u+ , '�ir �,�: r��,�. r t ( �� .,r.
p, - 2. The Community Pion deem not designate cossardial ,
development for the northeast or southeast corners
Y • ' of Durham Road and Pacific Highway.
3. The proposal includes:
a. 201 acres supporting 1250 dwelling units
b. 1.92 persons per dwelling unit or a maximum of
2400 total population
c. Typical residential lot area of 4,000 square feet
d. 49.5 acres of golf course and natural reserve areas
e. Approximately 20,000 square foot recreation building,
maintenance building, lakes, pool, tennis courts
and parking for 125 cars.
f. Single family lots of 50'x80' with 10 feet
front, 4 foot side and 8 foot rear yards. Rear F
and side yard setbacks may be waived for "common-
wall" or "zero-lot lino" dwellings
4. Adequate community shopping and commercial facilities
are provided in proximity to the development--at the
King City shopping center.
5. With development of this magnitude, road improvements
will be required to serve the additional resident
population and those who will use the public recreational
facilities.
6. The Department of Environmental Quality has approved
nomoccu building ermits--to allow construction
u�u�y tmit p
of model homes. Connections to the King City treatment •
plant will depend upon D.E.Q. approval of the completed
treatment plant expression next year.
7. The Tigard Water District is in the process of
connecting its lines to the Lake Oswego water system.
This should be completed by May of 194 .
8. Housing will have age restrictions in the project by
the developer.
Based upon the above fig , the staff recommends approval
of the request with the fel awing conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permit within
the development, a site plan of the entire development
setting forth the site development standards shall be
submitted to the Planning Commission for review and
approval. This plan shall include but not be limited
to landscaping, setbacks, building heights, signs,
. streets, proposed improvements, sidewalks, curbs,
'utters, parking, service and storage areas.
weei
Pg. 2 - Staff Report - "ibmerfield"
•
4 a +Cri. "i tt F rqe { r ' , M 1 F k fS Yk 74
1'
"
IY
x(
,
t�`H F },h y r .T y, . X1 43 ! , e/ .14 A : :4'? aa il Ai Y: v:t
. e 1 r r 2 ilr P fti R' q x
:' k � . A'.; .y ).f
. d, K
s n 7
r :
r s ,
2. All land within the development shall be used for :::,,!!',,,.
residential and recreational purposes, except that the
area designated for commercial uses on the site plan
may include service and/or professional office uses tc,
serving the development. If such uses are approved, , ';
the P Commission shall approve the location, t
• access, sit and range of permitted uses.
3. Each phase of the development shall be reviewed r '
and approved by the Planning Commission. At the �.
time of approval of each phase, the densities and r
uses shall be approved.
4. A boat and trailer storage area shall be designated in -1
•an area contained by an opaque fence or sight obscuring '
landscape screening maintained at not less than six
HI
(6) feet nor more than seven (7) feet in height.
5. The apartments in the project shall be developed in
accordance with A-2 standards unless. otherwise approved •j
on a specific site plan by the Planning Commission. `•
6. The overall density of the development shall be no' N
greater than 6.25 dwelling units per acre (1250 total ;.1
units) with a total population not to exceed 2400 i
persons. .
7. The setbacks and lot sixes as proposed for , single
family units shall be approved unless otherwise
if ied
� by 11111 Ply Commission, except that there
shall be a ten (10) foot minimum yard requirement
where any yard abuts a public street.
8. Approval of any lots to be subdivided shall be through
the Subdivision Ordinance procedures.
9. Open space shall be maintained through a Homeowners
Association or by the developers with convenants
submitted for approval at the filing of the final plat
10. All utilities shall be subsurface installations.
11. Housing shall be limited to an average density of
no more than 1.92 persons per dwelling unit. +`
12. Excluded parcels surrounded by "Summerfield" shall
be included in the site plan with the possibility
of access provided these parcels to eliminate their
isolation. .
{
Pg. 3 - Staff Report "Summerfield"
,
4,7'; F U'fr r; (�`4�(Nai(�r " rfl 1�`y Sy ` t �� , y c.•�-5 � r w'(� f '4,".>", §fir!
94
e' fi. �` t t ♦ s t 7' jL t t' 3' 't r r Se
��'.:r
i1 Ct°�i gi�r a Sa
k rr a
s q • � ` }"r r• rYY t_
'
41,
ifg `
r � ` 2aF tx a
pri r�
91'"Srb`• f� "'r3' rrrK}wtc. * ' }�y^1,1�'� �`c�o +. + j'
r f>, tf rlr H t n, 1
`4.-, to' 45 feet from centerline
� 13. /bore shall be aalctdo'
y tr; st
on S.W. Durham Road.
14. There shall be dedication of 35 feet from centerline
with a 40 foot improvement provided on S.W. 98th x k�
where the development abuts both sides of the road
and a half street improvement where the development
lrt , abuts only one side of .the road.
15. There shall be dedioation of 25 feet from centerline
(32 feet improvement) on S.W. Waive Street with hair
street improvement Where applicable. •
16. There shall be dedication of 30 feet from centerline
on S.M. Settler (36 feet improvement) with half street
improvement where applicable.
17. Internal street improvements will be designated at the
tin of the platting of the subdivision.
18. There shall be no occupancy without public water and
sewer.
19. A copy of the deed restrictions and covenants shall
be attached to the approved plan to help insure
conformity with planned densities.
20. Phase II of the development Shall not be approved
• until additional water service is available to the
Tigard Water District from the City of Portland
and/or City of Lake Oswego.
•
•
•
•
- Pg. 4 . Staff Report - "Summarfield"
-.r
1
I
GAARCat". MCDONAI...D
T- ' i
I
liffIlip
BULL MTN RDA- o_o CITY
R-7 ri
COUNTY SATTLFR fm"!
KING CITY R-7
---,, t'
1°%. , '...,„.._\N-%. .. ---,„,.... ---„,.
DI.IRHAt,i RD. w ';
>
a
'` COUNTY a
R-7
0
CZ A
t,
f}
Y.
ZONE CHANGE
AREA OF CONSIDERATION
. lii:.,,,:..,
\�\ COUNTY FL.R TO CITY P—D �',
t.
SCALE I" = 2000'
is
.
C
1. 1 li
is
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held
by the Planning Commission of the City of Tigard within the
Twality Jr. High School lecture room, at 14650 S.W. 97th,
Tigard, Oregon on December 19, 1972 at 8:00 P.M., with
respect to the following:
An application by the City of Tigard for
a change of zone classification from County
P-H, Planned Residential tu City P-D,
Planned Development zoning for a 200 acre
tract commonly known as "Summerfield". The
planned residential community is located on
the northeast corner of S.W. Pacific Highway
and S.W. Durham Road, extending easterly from
Pacific Highway approximately 6700 feet, just
east of King City, including: tax lots 1100,
1302, 1303, 1301, 2000, 1900, 1901, 1902 and
i400 on tax map 251 10D; tax lots 900, 1000,
1100„, 1900„ 1600, 1700, 2000 and 2600 on
tax map 251 11C; and tax lots 1500 and 900
on tax map 251 11D
All persons having an interest in the matter are invited to
attend and he heardo
•
•
gk a.ow,;.,, tiy,,n 4 Vii, ... .. _. �.. 7irMO r.E�riwu.�rrsaav ...
•
•
Tigard Planning Commission
Staff Report
December 19, 1972
Subdivision Name
"Summerfield I"
Sponsor
Tualatin Development Company, Inc.
Engineer/Surveyor
Harris-McMonagle
cation and Zoning
The property in question is zoned P-D, Planned Development
and is located on the north side of S.W. Durham Road,
west of S.W. 98th Avenue and east of S.W. 109th Avenue.
Applicant's Request
Preliminary approval of a subdivision plat which proposes
to divide approximately 26 acres in 141 single family lots.
Housing types will include single family detached dwellings
and townhouses. Also, included on the preliminary plat
is the 9th Green and 1st Fairway of the golf course (Tract A)
and Recreation Center (Tract B).
Conformance with the Community Plan
The adopted Tigard Community Plan designates the subject
property for Urban Low Density Residential development,
. having a density of 4 dwelling units or 12 persons per
gross residential acre. The proposed subdivision's
density is approximately 5.4 dwelling units per acre.
However, deed restrictions and Planning Commission review
( of each phase of the entire project will insure planned
• densities are followed.
1.
$. .4,:-•'..:::, ' "�' o:ri .Y< s � t `� it r 'r i' Y �b$ + :? !� a � } T„ . 4 K r} R v is - .4 _t r
4 1: ,E „. . 1ttA.v9` .•4, N-. I 'Yf,.,r 1`. ,6,.. .v 1 4X n�,,',ir d ai , ,-r i
t •,r t d::'Y''''•.1'---;,:'''-''''4- , 3 ! ' e at ,i a . 'ytz l P „7�a 1,i It-'
'�'ro a. '' ' ;# d .•In L pL. _ 'y}. � rx r�u 4..:4;''.‘:1-,111 r �S' r iPi''
,vR'(,n' ` & i'w(-4 4t q(p rt4 E; v:li 1 o a ° ` . i. 1 4p ,0i1 „,,,,01-,,,--s>t�
., N s + -, z x,, 7e, x+ ,, ,1. •-r 3 i (-. ,'P y i'rt0 4t0 1�r R, „qqr., ”. 4, ,L` <i.•
': ,"� z,.: i `'' t z ..� a r� ;fir ag. ,u '.� �3...;'t-.4.-SCI a r y�1 tW+4`'4 ti j�d "F1" §p.r a r �\ f.
4 i J ':117,i,.;:.,...4‘ 6 � r (� '�
k o �: t �S4 i 'P'ira as {.
-� . r� ri 4 �t rod > �. �1 " , Y it < � a�
�„ � .. sx r`at! rk��,�,y.;.� e< � I,� a.,y x � � �r� 1�1 �r,��; �
�' ;:ithJk, S t" 11 1 h ;is% ' t se_ ° 1 yr ?i �( ,, 1',
`$ k per! ' o y sA1 1-4Ih; 45
?tr 7 Mf •.1. • se!'r oo _.. .1��1f ,,,,..1.1.....-,,,,,,,-,,„:..,,,,1 ' {z I l;
3
0 �f• -DuItrict. ,r a t a d3rYa tJ•
7Y i�
P i(a *e ti ( r t : a3�Yl i5 R A
>.,:.µ l Alter . 'a ' ,° � t7' } ri,
� Osified �+e 't+��
',`�. ooap1sted new' the y { t
r4,a 'i r :se sbe will 1'Y` : ti{
'' ' 2E, transterld to the U.$.A• pmt , °
a•k iJ ;s,Y.. 11 4 3 , k.
° h &r'y Ira•
�f
tail ' I
i I
}` 't„ It is recosended that liain approval b
i
§ ; with the following o teas s j 4 K'''
� .
t�r +`' ,, engineering lams and iticat oas• 4a
{`Na z+l' k(y be approved prior to soorptss cI of the Final '-laat. ,. , �.
3rI jYJdt y#a ( 1”
nosed aco4ptala�le iffils '4
x}$ k;,igty ; 2. That all streets sban be prior to ii
Yj ;t+ire of the Final Plat. 4�f3 "
" fka That the Homeowners Aroma wort °t
} approved in fora by t CI Atep►, mad *hall °t,`kr
ji �. ure aainten oe of sh roc facilitl
s � ,t areas. , 1 4 � �
4. That the Urrairmi S. for tie outlay basin be r -i G
ro+riewod end tae PUb]ie Mo�rlcs p t t ?
) 4 P1at• Ljl
prior" to • r. 1)
1 a 5 (f ?"'
fit`. , : 5. That the Final Rat provide a plat restriction ..if , r .•
*galast direct *0000 r ento S.M. Dustiest 1 oli►d a > ''''''''.2'1.-;•1
,}3'r
for deb ,p*ted streets. 0 ,i,,
,,-_(!,-.':4'1:!.,::„.r i.
I k`1 rt
fslt it
q 2
i
�rci YEJ
oE -;
kry.rA
•
I .i+Yll
air
I\r�i[�4f�;1T
Pg. 2 Staff Report - " ii]d'' via, 031 ' '_,
t 5.• ,• 1 )
+ - e r7 ;'i4-
Ik
J .x,Nf fl d„'H. '.C.. , e., .r.4."'`.4.7 ro ' r ,a i!Z�'_a �`3'"�.,� z•X"r #k;?3 z,r '''',:f,'' ?{,e, _ ! ,. ' `I' 4 cf .H:,.1,,.,,,,,,,.,,, ,t