The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 05/12/2015 7111 I • City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda • TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Revised 5/7/2015 Agenda Item No. 7 rescheduled to May 26, 2015. Revised 5/12/2015 Agenda Item No. 5 will be rescheduled. MEETING DATE AND TIME: May 12,2015 - 6:30 p.m.Study Session;7:30 p.m.Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item.Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171,ext.2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m.on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171,ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://live.tigard-or.gov CABLE VIEWERS:The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. 111 + City of Tigard t TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Revised 5/7/2015 Agenda Item No.7 rescheduled to May 26,2015. Revised 5/12/2015 Agenda Item No.5 will be rescheduled. MEETING DATE AND TIME: May 12,2015 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 •STUDY SESSION •EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public. A. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 6:30 p.m. estimated time B. POTENTIAL CONTRACT DISCUSSION -PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERLAY CONSTRUCTION AND CRACK SEALING 6:45 p.m. estimated time C. DISCUSS CITYWIDE MASTER FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE 7:05 p.m. estimated time 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Council Communications &Liaison Reports E. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please) A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Tigard High School Student Envoy C. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce D. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion.Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 7:35 p.m. estimated time A. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: •March 17,2015 •Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. PROCLAIM NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK 7:40 p.m.estimated time 5. _ " _ • • _ Item will be rescheduled. 6. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL ENVOY CARTER KRUSE 7:55 p.m. estimated time 7. • Y • - ~ Y Rescheduled to May 26,2015 8. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON THE YMCA STUDY 8:00 p.m. estimated time 9. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON TIGARD CITY CHARTER REVIEW 8:50 p.m. estimated time 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session for consultation with counsel concerning legal rights and duties regarding current litigation or litigation likely to be filed,under ORS 192.660(2) (h).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. 9:15 p.m. estimated time 11. NON AGENDA ITEMS 12. ADJOURNMENT 9:30 p.m. estimated time ,, City of Tigard ■ Tigard City Council Meeting Agenda TIGARD May 12, 2015 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 6:30 p.m. A. Council Liaison Reports 6:30 p.m. estimated time B. Potential Contract Discussion—Pavement Management Program Overlay Construction and Crack Sealing 6:45 p.m. estimated time • City Engineer Faha and Public Contracts Manager Barrett C. Discuss Citywide Master Fees and Charges Schedule 7:05 p.m. estimated time • Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS: • "If I Were Mayor"Contest—Mayor Cook • North Dakota Street Closure—City Manager Wine May 4 Monday Budget Committee Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Public Works Auditorium 5 Tuesday City Center Development Agency Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 12* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 19* Tuesday Council Business/Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 26* ,Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall June 2 Tuesday City Center Development Agency Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 9* Tuesday Council/CCDA Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 16* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 23* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk(*). AIS-2063 A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Council Liaison Reports Submitted By: Norma Alley,City Management Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg- Study Sess. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Council will present liaison reports. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments No file(s)attached. Draft Document For Review ac. Comment • Willamette Governance Group Draft Water Rights Options for Discussion r � ' Y OPTION OPTION A OPTION B OPTI• C OPTION D Description Turn over all water Each agency keeps Combined option Other? Summary rights to the new their own water 7( entity for rights for their —Water rights are /'�� management. own use available for use 9 / exclusively by all entities until ;J All Permits and regulation occurs Certificates would then only for each be assigned to the agency,includes new entity ability to lease - Water rights stay me of each y joint use Gr GA conditions Pros and Cons + Efficiencies for +Maintain +,Efficiencies for operations and certainty related operations and transactions to each agencies transactions, only permit conditions need to track each +Ability to use entities use in +� water rights with + Maintain control regulation period best conditions first of your water right permit + Maintain control +Assist in "Proving and certainty of Up"the permits o Each agency your water right responsible for permit - Loss of control of their own water your water right right transactions +Assist in "Proving . permit Up" the permits - No joint use to - Loss of certainty assist in "Proving +Allows agency to related to each Up" the permits maintain water agencies permit right if entity conditions - Loss of dissolves efficiencies for operations and o Would need to transactions determine if leasing is for water rights or capacity only SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR (DATE OF MF G) WGG/Draft Water Right Options 04-02-15 $mil/y Sc' SS ; t' — ��Ol//7Gi/ Liti(Sol% /?epor ❑ CONNECTION s� NW MEEK RD TO EXISTING P SUPPLY LINE O 14/itth W LUOridu o Y Z P' P.C./. aD�� ,° PREFERRED PIPELINE RUU �: MW-EVERGREEN RD / m > mT � Pipeline routes shown are subject to refinement as designs develop. 4./../. ,..,,,F6 9,104 1 . • • .„ NWAMBERWOOD > DR • % / # / NW CORNED RO s \ ..., ,, ,,7 .%// 1,:e4/ tV A - \ -\ \ - , ,r . \ UR1Y5\ RD//v hdi.gi/ � q /�0ed•vi//j �'y� \ A0 CONNECTION \ \ �I C.I t,-;0A, 1.' \e\ '\\ TO EXISTING _/w n`Cr\\\�rL `SUPPLY LINE \\� sW suNse7 '5�G l0 \ \\ \ _ ' 'h'v / �\ \, 2r SW y° ✓. �j///, ,'/ . \ 81M TERMAN R• �\ �\ ypNREY BL` / / / TUALATIN , \\\\�� Q /�/ $ _ .HILLS SCFio \\\ °• ,- _L7% „� 1... NATURE TRAIL �` tJ��\��\ .‘ \1-SW Ertl Q }/ \ ‘Nit. \ 7if 1 x-04 RD SW PATION \ LLTKiryk• e 1 c,Y %,`n AY %�leek \ v. s^ Nr� �� 'BROAD`I'IPy SW BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HWY 10. 5S SW ST �' 0(`J. \ Hsr ¢4 I lyy\ 7DAVIS R° SW ALLEN BLVD rc co ❑ ' SW VERMONT Si ..1 - SW ROSEDALE RD \ �•" Beaverton Q N \\'., SW DENNEY RD \ \ \ Z y� \(`]\\\```\\ .jy.MULTN..BLVD v eURKHALTER RD I• �\W{\tl\R7 S /.(�� ®� \‘t..4,\91a "' ` �,•��' � m �y L at � O /� co � !' �� • `A h�BROCKMAN ST One .... ►�I \ \ \ J ®MG�711 Q:• ,•NAIv• 6 •_ `` SW WEIR RD ` `� \ Ji" II •■ SW TI 0 ` S� SCHOLLW FERRY St' <F FCIT R°N �\ e El \\ = N n J' ^ RiYFR N N KERR t RO N �•( z jrio ALNLlT`•+S 01 Tigard dr SW LAUREL RD ti CDi b SW MCDONALD ST KRUSE WAY SW GAARDE ST p f O - it Sh'BULL MOUNTAIN RD SW BONITA RD C - . W Q Q r H J D Oa N f O Cc m ; SW BEEF BEND RD SW DURHAM RD m W King _ N e 0 CC C I ty �ua,at�n Kivu �'y�� SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD (r. ) 1 D.' ' .----"''» SW TUALATIN RD SW LEBEAU RD TUALATIN RIVER - T NATIONAL WILDLIFE in w West Fork Chi REFUGE G z Tualatin �; hi � e�^ z O°RI) �eek SW CIPOIE RD O rn �\ag�'EO e0 SW SAGERT ST SW BO•AND RD BPS' SW AVERY ST �e 205 i SW EDY RD SW 4 Z 12 s m yt•I WRUGER RO ; GeP° �GON ST SW 124TH AVENUE N Qr 5,c) EXTENSION 4 W /.... Sherwood ■ e° SW SUNSET BLVD Oe° co FQ N SW CHAPMAN RD W TONOUIN RD g * Miles 0 0.5 1 SW BROOKMAN RD m SW GARDEN SW COMMERCE CIR I i e1,\` ® ck ACRES RD y /,. ,�' _ �O \ SW DAY RD Zv 'f PO =Y7 IN IN Sil'E LIGSEN RD (2,\''- SW RIDDER RD �(r ,L� SW HOMESTEADER HD co LEGEND ■> m� m ■W �� DRAFT PREFERRED ALIGNMENTS: SW TOOZE RD 0 COFF:E = ■y v SECTION 1 WETLA DS R§ �o�' •••In• ALTERNATE ski-WESTPALL RD N SW BOECKMAN RD SW ADVANCE RD SECTION 2 sw * . ALTERNATE BFI ) SECTION 3 N tCENTFR ® SECTION 4 4 SW 124TH AVENUE EXTENSION . GRAHAM OAK gig: WATER SERVICE AREAS. NATURE K ...0.),.t. i'- CITY OF HILLSBORO "'t'` s" WTP TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT(TVD) W URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY(UGB) WILLAMETTE RIVER WATER STREAMS TREATMENT / e ReC W I I s o Ville PLANT oe< BASE MAP SO URCE: METRO-RLIS (FEB. 2015). -- W\\`a )lerno /l i�/1 oti, SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR or n9., o/s- (film ye r oa Hunziker Industrial Core (State Legislative Funding Request) ATE OF MEET 2�1U/15 Tigard, at the center of the economically thriving Portland MSA, is ideally located to meet regional employment demand.The region's workforce lives here. What's lacking, however, is infrastructure that supports business expansion here. Tigard's Hunziker Industrial Core includes more than 138 acres of industrial zoned property located 3/of a mile from 1-5 and immediately accessible by existing rail. In this area, 96 acres are developed but underutilized. Forty-two acres are undeveloped but limited in their development potential.The area exemplifies the challenge inner-ring suburban cities face when trying to support business growth. Factors like sloping land, limited site access and incomplete infrastructure make private sector development unlikely. Through the support of a DLCD grant, and in partnership with local property owners,the City of Tigard developed a Public Infrastructure Finance Plan that paves the way for private sector development, business growth, and increased employment.The cost of public infrastructure (roads, water, waste water and storm water)to support private sector development in the Hunziker Industrial Core is about $10.5 million. The first$3.3 million project upgrades infrastructure in this area to initially catalyze$22.1 million in new private investment and approximately 150 to 300 new jobs for residents from around the region. The City of Tigard would like to make a request to the State Legislature for$1.8 million in economic development assistance toward full funding for roads, water, waste water and storm water infrastructure improvements.The balance of the public infrastructure costs would come from a combination of local funds and/or Federal funding which we are also pursuing. Public Infrastructure Investments Needed in Hunziker Industrial Core Road Water Storm Sewer Total Cost Wall Street North $ 2,161,108 $ 393,600 $ 460,575 $ 291,950 $ 3,307,233 Wall Street South $ 1,642,504 $ 266,400 $ 307,250 0 $ 2,216,154 Wall to Hall $ 3,370,907 $ 247,800 $ 1,063,600 $ 366,250 $ 5,048,557 Infrastructure Totals $ 7,174,519 $ 907,800 $ 1,831,425 $ 658,200 $ 10,571,944 Upgraded and new infrastructure, completed in stages to leverage private sector investment, prepares Tigard's employment lands for higher value investment, development and job creation. Economic Impact of Infrastructure Investments in Hunziker Industrial Core New Gross Private Public Floor Acreage Market Investment Infrastructure Est.Jobs Area Unlocked Value Wall Street North $22M $ 3,307,233 115 225000 SF 18 $27 M Wall Street South $14M $ 2,216,154 88-208 150000 SF 13 $25M Wall to Hall $28M $ 5,048,557 231-544 300000 5f 34 $28M City of Tigard Page 1 of 2 Hunziker Industrial Core 1 iw i X1 / •.� '`. p,, \\/._ • Air -,� `t w. .+ _ , ,, 4. Apr "> ,..----Z- Properties located in the Hunziker Industrial Core are primarily either vacant, or used for storage and distribution facilities. New infrastructure on these centrally located employment lands will support more intense development,job creation and higher value industry. (Photo from 2012.) Characterization of Properties and Uses Conceptual Infrastructure Alignments 1. Vacant 18 Acre Fields Industrial Site.2. Vacant 8 Acre Brownfield Site with NFA. 7".' {" t143. Storage and Distribution Sites. "►� I 1 S.,...„.■ t_. 4. Manufacturing Sites. T., s '� i The 138 acres of our Hunziker Industrial Core �` �' employment lands(pictured above) carries 2.8 ;` ,r �>�'.. ' �I ,,yyr employees per acre. Comparatively,when considering '` ,�.■ all industrial zoned property in Tigard, employment _..• levels exceed 13 people per acre. "v " dig ; Sr- 4' The Hunziker Industrial core, located 3/of a mile from " 1-5 and with immediate access to rail, has the P otential to support more development, new business activity and higher levels of employment. _,'°'0""'I :w The illustration to the right highlights a preferred , ^ 4--^�^- Infrastructure alignment and phases for roads, waste _`.... _ water, water and storm water that improve the — .: .I development potential, business growth and increased . =:–'-- ., .._ employment.The estimated cost of this public mom^ infrastructure exceeds$10.5 million. m n iStk .11.....................1 .se.. ` City of Tigard Page 2 of 2 i \,. M 111 /�� ....,.rte., WALL STREET INDUSTRIAL eAR\k, TIGARD, OR - M A IE : / 9 �LO . r yN --.-.. / r. I Eh , �,.•- - - .4X.R„L.41E1 ® E11LOk. A a, BUILDING c 56.180 Q 74.880 9F 1t 1.- � 128 SPACES(2311000) 129 SPACES(17/L0O0) � az f7 c s t' c i_ 9118438StES 61i�?8E3i"&i?dd6&1SA,iilIgilli� _ ��ii i h 4 — d9F�+flURr�4i7U&E4r3B[5 t1�#�114E�51B18.1'� -- — 111111,41 1P®R \\\11' + e _ — R Eamtsw!mmitlitzmo7@ actiatati livioEE `14;4. 1 F 144SEEMIL�■eftiti ICIEIRSIRESII R;' { ; iL liii — — L_ r 1 / / _ / I ri>a . . i ' /. ; I I: L,,,, :• EJfE11110 MUM a uiSD'i.s 118887N0 000IMIEf -. • _ BUILDING A BUILDING I BUILDING C TOTAL • �\�\��\\a�-��a�� - - APPROX. LOT AREA 4.94 ACRES 6.64 ACRES 6.72 ACRES 18.3 ACRES • I `'----_-- - --------''�--�°1,_:_ BUILDING AREA 56,160SF 93,600 SF 74,880 SF 224,6405E - " -`- - - - BUILDING DIMENSIONS 312'8180' 520'8180' 416'8180' SITE PLAN CLEAR HEIGHT 24'CLEAR 24'CLEAR 24'CLEAR AUTO STALLS 128 SPACES 138 SPACES 129 SPACES 395 SPACES ,I STE PLAN DOCB 000115 12 25 18 55 e i ' T IiammellCrowComparn OP..'.' - - DRIVE-IN DOORS 4 4 4 12 .......,. -- MC.ar • , / C2.1 -- s,°- seam. FEBRUARY n e Ir 4. f .r'_. Hunziker ndustria o employment to m-� : Infrastructure for em ent la,= . s ,$,,' _ - i` , . -1111* --‘ 0 .1 '.S, - _ . w - •_ - e-., • t' 1�I` • a - 1 Hunziker Industrial Core • NI,' '� ` ,. �� .4 ,�_a 138 acres industrial zoned property 1 : , \ • '.; -. f , IP o •, :-/t- N.,dir. 4. ' i eao sail . *Al% 4%. 4PN ' 14/ Leal r t IP 4- *., ir . • 4 44 .... .. , IT, . : , 44p 11111111.,/ivir•__:., ,ii, , ..' .... ph Iv 4.,)44%,11?/46, de,, No ' :1.1.i.„:., *iv.‘, ..... --Alil v I " dr > - .`�• - r ,alit 1 nu 1 a ' ri ti. '� �= -J� " am" �, H W Y 217 , C a � �� lib. 'Mb i� ? "tea. ,»'Oh,. � „ . .„...„..„.. _ ,,,,'/ • j �. �� .. ft .-*%• . =t. '�. t. . a • 1 18 acre Trammell Crow Property II n, ,I .. •.:' `r Proposed Development . - R . 225,000 square feet Rail � Estimated $22 million investment I Switching I ' Yard _ ",!!!�� . iff 1, a 1. 12,E e ti _ 1 • r 4 ),/-r«:V4`k. �c;� w - 1• 11 '� 1 Wall Street Infrastructure - - - • - Road $3,803,000 " „ -a- , , , P t + - Water $ 660,000r •- Storm $ 767,825 ` "' _, � � - Sewer $ 291,950 �• � �� III �` - .. . Total: $5.5 million ** Ts-. ■i . - — II' II Illir • • J r ".. I a.- , . 1116.111 r III1H t . r il ! ' el, • +M t w r' . II, 1 4 1'. • 1• • , . I --- , r s.•.. (,'"1. a -w •. a .a . w'• V r.__. is �► * ■ :Aft ,'t,' {� .r � t+ '. a _ ._ `■ r.. ,i. 3 x 500 1,000 ;000 • t ,j :` • Feet s et a . ee a.. y- �. .rGeogr_.ics,CNE-SIr rbus DS.US©h, USGS,AEh ' a w _ v 1 � j �JD f�Xy��C �[ ts .., . 1 00., and the I' USerCo i, BEAVERTON Tigard's Hunziker Industrial Core includes more ®, S 3 9/17T LAN D og than 138 acres of industrial zoned property located N 99W 3/4 of a mile from I-5 and immediately accessible by T'1GaR�qPS «q 4 71G490 �rs existing rail. In this area, 96 acres are developed but lik -yr o . ,,�� ,0SWEGO underutilized. Forty-two acres are undeveloped but w — Irv. ��,` limited in their development potential. The area _ •�� exemplifies the challenge inner ring suburban cities L._ _, �/�� DISCLAIMER: DATA SOURCES: T I G A R D , _ �� face when trying to support business growth. DISCLAIMER: denvee rmm Metro Tfgad �}�,. R H several databases The City Meho Washington County �✓T U A LATIN cannot accept responsibn�ty for 13125 SW Nall Blvd �� any errors Therefore there are Tigard,Oregon 97223 no ranhes for this product 503.639 4171 uowever any nubhcabon of w.tigard•or.gov Pnnt Date:21252015 errors is aapreclaled ww 9s e R 0 I! ,,� � .0 Kii till...A!fr...____ /�o �,� ‘...- / 6' 4W 4 d f My..► F� M� f y I i / \Y''/ .-,: . 'X V / / . a / -.... 4 7 0 R. n W 2 0 V t •wt EU a ci5 / 1 HI w . E RJR CN 'J c3 o —,W a.. z., ENGINEERING DVISION W PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WALL STREET FIGURE 13125 S.W. wuc ecvD. FIG- 1 cE 13125, OREGON 97223 ROADWAY EXTENSION ., VOICE: 503-639-4171 FILE NO a4 TIGARD FAX: TIGARD-oR..GO7v2 TECH CENTER DRIVE TO HUNZIKER STREET • 91018 AIS-2180 B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Potential Contract Discussion -Pavement Management Program Overlay Construction and Crack Seal Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett,Financial and Information Services Item Type: Update,Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg- Study Sess. Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Discussion of potential public improvement contracts for the pavement overlay construction projects of the pavement management program and crack seal program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST Staff is asking Council to provide direction and inform staff of any additional information they would like to have presented during the contract award for upcoming contracts under the Pavement Management Program for FY 2015-2016. The Local Contract Review Board will be presented with a contract award motion for each contract at their May 26th Business Meeting. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Pavement Management Program- Crack Seal Work under the city's Pavement Management Program - Crack Seal contract shall include •Installation of crack seal on city streets •Temporary signage,protection,and traffic control •Performance of additional and incidental work as called for by the specifications and plans. The city issued an Invitation to Bid on April 8th and advertised the project in both the Daily Journal of Commerce (April 8 & 10) and the Tigard Times (April 9). Bids were publicly opened at 3 pm on April 23rd with the city receiving a single response: Bidder's Name - Bid CR Contracting- $0.87/linear foot It is worth noting that last year the city only received two bids and CR Contracting has held the city's crack sealing contract for the last few years. Staff has reviewed the bids and has found CR Contracting to be a reputable company fully capable of performing the work required on this project. CR Contracting has had no State of Oregon Contractor Construction Board disciplinary actions and is not on the Bureau of Labor and Industries ineligible list. Staff will recommend to the Local Contract Review Board at their May 26th Business Meeting that the Board award the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Pavement Management Program- Crack Seal contract to CR Contracting. Staff anticipates the total amount spent under this contract will not exceed $200,000. PMP Rehabilitation (Overlay) The yearly Pavement Management Program (PMP) protects the city's investment in street infrastructure. The program typically includes a combination of minor maintenance projects (slurry seal applications) and major maintenance and rehabilitation projects (pavement overlays). In a payment overlay project, the pavement on a street has deteriorated due to traffic usage and weather,and is at the point where pavement repairs and overlays are necessary to avoid further deterioration and return the street to a good condition. Work under the project will include: •Construction of asphaltic concrete inlays and overlays •Asphalt concrete removal (grinding) and repair •Adjustment of facilities to match new pavement level •Applying sealant along pavement edges and joints •Temporary signage,protection,and traffic control •Striping and pavement marking •Construction of concrete curbs and ramps •Performance of additional and incidental work as called for by the specifications and plans. For fiscal year 2015-2016,the city has identified the following streets, or sections of these streets,in need of this level of repair: •Nimbus - End to Scholls Ferry •Springwood - 121st to Scholls Ferry •North Dakota - Springwood to 121st& 115th to Gallo •Walnut-Tiedeman to Pacific Hwy •Grant-Walnut to McKenzie •92nd -Waverly to Durham The city issued an Invitation to Bid for the project on April 8th and published notice in the Daily journal of Commerce (April 8 & 10) and in the Tigard Times (April 9). Bids were due on April 23rd and the city received responses from five companies (Engineer's Estimate $1,085,900): •S-2 Contractors - $1,017,537 •Eagle-Elsner- $1,111,129 •Brix Paving- $1,153,643 •Knife River- $1,215,657 •Baker Rock Resources - $1,229,569 Staff has reviewed the bids and determined that S-2 Contractors has submitted the lowest responsible bid. S-2 Contractors has no State of Oregon Contractor Construction Board violations and is not on the Bureau of Labor and Industries ineligible list. Staff will recommend at the May 26th Business Meeting that the contract for the FY 2015-2016 Pavement Management Program—Pavement Rehabilitation (Overlay) project be awarded to S-2 Contractors for $1,017,537. Staff is asking Council if there is any additional information they would like to see in determining this award. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to have staff cancel the contract award presentations on May 26th either direct staff to reissue the Invitations to Bid or cancel the work for FY 2015-2016. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION This is the first time the Council has discussed these contracts. Fiscal Impact Cost: See Below Budgeted (yes or no): See Below Where budgeted?: Street Maintenance Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: The 2015-2016 budget for the pavement management program has $1,407,681 proposed for external construction services. Both of these contract are for external construction services and combine for a total of$1,217,537 which would remain under the construction appropriations currently proposed. Attachments No frle(s)attached. AIS-1820 C. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Discuss Citywide Master Fees and Charges Schedule Prepared For: Toby LaFrance,Financial and Information Services Submitted By: Carissa Collins,Financial and Information Services Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg- Study Sess. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE City Council Discussion of the FY 2016 Proposed Master Fees &Charges Schedule. STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST Staff requests Council direction on the proposed changes to the FY 2016 Master Fees & Charges Schedule prior to June 9, 2015 budget adoption. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY As part of the annual budget and as directed by TMC 3.32.050, Council adopts the Master Fees & Charges Schedule at the first business meeting in June as part of the annual budget process.The attached "FY 2016 Master Fees and Charges Summary of Changes Report outlines the proposed changes to the Master Fees and Charges, the basis of the change, the authority for proposing the change,and where that change can be found in the actual Master Fees and charges. Additionally, this agenda item summary includes the strikeout version of the Master Fees and Charges so that Council can review the detail of the proposed changes in fees. Staff submits these changes to the FY 2016 Fees &Charges for council review in order to provide an opportunity for discussion of any changes in fees prior to budget adoption. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the FY 2016 Master Fees &Charges Schedule,or direct staff to amend the schedule. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: Not applicable Attachments Memo FY 2016 Fees Summary Master Fees&Charges INCity of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum _ E To: City Council Members From: Carissa Collins, Sr. Management Analyst Re: FY 2016 Master Fees & Charges Schedule Date: May 4, 2015 Every year, the City Council adopts the Master Fees and Charges Schedule at the first business meeting in June. Typically, this is the first time that council is given the opportunity to see any updated or newly proposed fees. Staff presents a strikeout version of the FY 2016 Master Fees & Charges Schedule. In addition,you will find a summary report of the changes that were made as a reference. If you have any questions or concerns,please feel free to contact me at 503-718-2643. FY 2016 Proposed Master Fees & Charges Summary of Changes Report ' tv ' ° :e. d e �a C g, f r k t 3 r9 4 j kE t n FF � 4-'4, A°; *. �.... �. U21," V Opt s ® kF"EK&9 ¢" "�, 9z d U ` p k e Paaw $ >ha d1J� P -"6�u'. », d _ alb' - a Financial&Information Services Business License(Annual Fee) 4 Fees adjusted by 2%inflationary rate to pay for 1.0 FTE Detective in the Ord.88-13 Y Commercial Crimes Unit as approved by Budget Committee. Employee categories were revised to make fees more equitable.The 11-50 employee category was broken in to 11-20&21-50 categories. Annual fees will continue to be adjusted based on the Portland Consumer Price Index beginning in FY 2017. Library • . - 7 Annual fee for library cards purchased by non-residents who are ineligible for a free WCCLS N card. Police Late payment of fees/fines(after 60 days) 8 Corrected the title of the fee. Dept.Policy N Special Event Permit Application Fee 8 New fee that will recover adminstrative costs related to processing special event Dept.Polity N applications. Community Development Planning Fees/Charges 18-24 No change to the FY 2015 fees.A new fees structure will be presented to council on Res.03-59 Y May 19,2015.Any adjustments to current fees will be occur subsequent to these discussions. Transportation Development Tax 40-41 This fee is determined by Washington County.TDT rates from July 1,2009 through Washington County Y September 30,2014 were discounted.Rates between October 1,2014 and June 30,2015 are adjusted with an increase of.962%.This rate is a combination of the cost of road construction,labor,and ROW using a 5-year rolling average. Public Works Street Maintenance Fee 26 Fee adjusted by 4.33%based on a combination of two indexes,the TMC 15.20 Y Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index,and the Oregon Monthly Asphalt Cement Material Price Index. . U ,',1 '1.1 . .. 27 Rates set by PGE Schedule#95 Option"A". PGE Y Fire Rates(Sprinklers1 31 Fee adjusted by 2.6%based in the Seattle-Construction Cost Index for April 2015. Dept.Policy Y Fire Service Connection 31 Fee adjusted by 2.6%based in the Seattle-Construction Cost Index for April 2015. Dept.Policy Y Sanitary Sewer Service Fee(set by Clean Water Service). 23,31 This fee is was increased by 3%and is calculated by Clean Water Service.The city Clean Water Services Y receives 16.306%of fees that are collected. Page 1 of 2 FY 2016 Proposed Master Fees & Charges Summary of Changes Report Included in Schedule Budget? Department Fee Description Page(s) Basis of Change Authority (YIN) Storm and Surface Water Fee(set by Clean Water Service) 32 Service charge is determined by Clean Water Service and will increase by 50 cents. Clean Water Services 1 The city receives 75%of fees that are collected. Water System Development Charge 39 Fee adjustment is tied to Seattle Construction Cost Index(CCI) ORS 223.304(8) which is 2.6%as of April 2015. Res.10-76 • Page 2 of 2 Exhibit A City of Tigard, Oregon Master Fees & Charges Schedule Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Adopted June 9,2015 11 p • TIGARD Page 1 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Da> CITY MANAGEMENT Claims Application Fee(TMC 1.21.050&L22:Ord,08-09) $1,000.00 /deposit" 6/24/2008 ' Claim fee shall be actual cost incurred by the city to process claim. Any funds remaining from the deposit after the claim has been processed will be refunded to the claimant.Payment of any costs exceeding the amount of the deposit is required prior to issuance of a final decision by the city on the claim. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Municipal Court Fees Civil Compromise $150.00 8/28/2008 Traffic School and Compliance Program Fee Criminal $150.00 8/28/2008 Juvenile non-traffic $75.00 8/28/2008 Traffic School Equal to the relevant fine provided for the 8/28/2008 violation in the Violations Bureau Fine Schedule Traffic School Setover $20.00 8/28/2008 License Reinstatement $15.00 8/28/2008 Payment Agreement Administrative Fee $15.00 8/28/2008 overdue Payment Letter $10.00 8/28/2008 Show Cause Hearings-Court Costs 8/28/2008 Non-compliance $25.00 Non-payment- fees paid prior to hearing No Fee Warrant Fee $50.00 8/28/2008 CITY MANAGEMENT Public Assembly 8/25/1970 Application Fee Persons Reasonably Anticipated 1,000 to 2,499 $100.00 2,500 to 4,999 $150.00 5,000 to 9,999 $500.00 10,000 to 49,999 $1,000.00 50,000 and over $1,500.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/RECORDS Tigard Municipal Code(TMC) (Titles 1-17)or TMC/CDC(Titles 1-181 Compact Disk(CD) $10.00 7/1/2009 Page 2 De.artment Revenue Source Fee or Char•a Effective Date CITYWIDE Attorney Time Current attorney billing rate 1999 2GB Flash Drives $11.00 each 7/1/2011 $6.00 7/1/2003 DVD/VHS $12.00 7/1/2006 Faxes for Public $2.00 /first page 7/1/2007 $1.00 /each additional page Microfiche Sheet Copies $1.00 /sheet up to 50 sheets plus 7/1/2007 staff time Microfilm/Microfiche&Photocopies 8-1/2 x 11 $0.25 /page 1999 11 x 14 $050 /page 1999 11 x 17 $1.00 /page 7/1/2005 17 x 24 $1.50 /page 7/1/2007 36 x 36 $2.50 /page 7/1/2007 Nomination Petition Fee $50.00 7/1/2008 Oversized Copies $2.50 /page 7/1/2011 Photographs Actual Cost 1999 Recording of Documents Actual Cost 1999 Research Fee Staff hourly rate+Citywide Overhead 2/7/2002 Fee+Materials Staff Hourly Rate for Miscellaneous Billing Staff hourly rate+benefits+paid time off+ 7/1/2012 and Reimbursement Agreements administrative time+department overhead+citywide overhead as determined by most recent A-87 Indirect Cost Study Page 3 De.artment Revenue Source Fee or C; '_'ective_ FINANCIAL& INFORMATION SERVICES Assessment Assumption $50.00 4/22/1985 Budget Document Compact Disk(CD) $10.00 7/1/2007 Paper $50.00 Business License Annual Fee' 0 2 employees $86:00,eryear- 7/1/2011 3 5 cmploycca $4-1-5700 /per year 7/1/2011 6 10 cmploycca X7.00 /per-yea- 7/1/2014 1 npleyees $6.24700-/-per-year- 7/1/2011 $84.40{per-year 7/1/2011 0-2 employees $88.00 /per year 7/1/2015 3-5 employees $118.00 /per year 7/1/2015 6-10 employees $415.00 /per year 7/1/2015 11-20 employees $680.00 /per year 7/1/2015 21-50 employees $780.00 /per year 7/1/2015 51 or more employees $1,000.00 /per year 7/1/2015 *Adjusted annual#in conjunction with the Portland Consumer Price Index(CPI) Pro-Rated Fee Schedule Issued January 1 -June 30 See Fee Schedule above Issued July 1 -December 31 1/2 the annual fee Temporary License $25.00 1/1/2008 Duplicate License/Change of Ownership Fee Change in ownership or name only $10.00 1/1/2008 Copy/replacement of license $10.00 1/1/2008 Delinquency Charge Whenever the business license fee is not paid on or before the delinquent date,a delinquency charge equal to ten percent(10%)of the original business license fee due and payable shall be added for each calendar month or fraction thereof that the fee remains unpaid. The total amount of the delinquency penalty for any business license Page 4 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Datt Comprehensive Annual Financial Report s().(H( 2/7/2002 Franchise Fee/Right of Way Usage Fee(See TMC 15.06) (( ens facility in ROW and provides service to customers Electricity within Tigard) 5%of gross revenue or$4,000 whichever is greater 1/9/2015 ((buns facility in ROW and provides no service to customers Electricity within Tigard) $2.90/linear foot of installation in right-of-way 1/9/2015 or$4,000,whichever is greater (Using a non-owned facility in ROW and provides service to Electricity customers within Tigard) 5%of gross revenue 1/9/2015 (Owns facility in ROW and provides service to customers Natural Gas within Tigard) 5%of gross revenue or$4,000 whichever is greater 1/9/2015 (Owns facility in ROW and provides no service to customers Natural Gas within Tigard) $2.90/linear foot of installation in right-of-way 1/9/2015 or$4,000,whichever is greater (Using a non-owned facility in ROW and provides service to Natural Gas customers within Tigard) 5%of gross revenue 1/9/2015 (Owns facility in ROW and provides service to customers Telecom* within Tigard) 5%of gross revenue or$4,000 whichever is greater 1/9/2015 Telecom* (Provides no service to customers within Tigard) $2.90/linear foot of installation in right-of-way 1/9/2015 or$4,000,whichever is greater (Using a non-owned facility in ROW and provides service to Telecom* customers within Tigard) 5%of gross revenue 1/9/2015 *(Includes telecommunication utilities, long distance providers, private networks and competitive access providers) Utility Franchise Application Fee $2,000.00 8/8/2006 Solid Waste Disposal(See TMC 11.04) 5%of gross revenue 7/1/2013 Cable TV(See TMC 5.12) 5%of gross revenue 1/26/1999 Application filed with MACC(email macc@maccor.org) Lien Search Fee $35.00 2/1/2004 Page 5 Department Revenue Source IMF — r ion Fee or Charge, Effective Dat Overhead Fee Added to charges for property damage/repair 10%of total charge Passport Execution Fee $25.00 2/1/2008 Passport Photographs Fee $10.00 4/1/2007 Returned Check Fee $20.00 10/9/2001 Sewer Reimbursement District Loans Interest Rate Applicable Federal Rate(AFR),Table,Long-term,semiannual for the month the loan is approved System Development Charge Financing(other than Sewer Reimbursement District Loans) Application Fee $25.00 Interest Rate Prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal as of the date of the application plus 4% Page 6 Effective D LIBRARY Collection Agency Fee $10.00 WCCLS 7/1/2007 Disk or CD(Blank), $1.00 Dept.Policy 2/7/2002 Flash Drive $5.00 each Dept.Policy 7/1/2013 Library Card Fee(non-residents only I $405.99 $110.00 per year WCCLS 7/1/20442015 Lost Items Replacement cost+$5.00 processing fee WCCLS 7/1/2003 1 Overdue Cultural Passes $10.00 per day WCCLS 7/1/2013 Overdue Items WCCLS Daily Charge(All Items except DVDs&Blu-Rays) $0.15 /item 7/1/2003 Daily Charge(DVDs&Blu-Rays) $1.00 /item 7/1/2005 Maximum Charge 55.00 /item 7/1/2005 E-Readers $1.00 per day up to a maximum of$5.00 Dept.Policy 7/1/2014 Public Copier and Printer Charges $0.10 /page for black&white Dept.Policy 2001 $0.50 /page for color 7/1/2011 Replacement Library Card Fee $1.00 7/1/2007 Page 7 Effective D. POLICE Alarm Permit Fee(Residential&Commercial) (G a rnallma agencies.diasbbd,ndlrl,i..l or o,'er/lm,mr 0/60 an rvo0711) 525.111) 1/211119 911tt1))) - 1/2013 Late payment of fees/fines(after 60 days) Failure to Obtain Permit within 60 Dais of Alarm Installation 5100.00 7/1/2013 Reinstatement Fec,Once Revoked(After 90 days past due) 5100.00 7/1/2014 Non-permitted or Revoked Alarm Permit 9500011 7/1/21113 Distracted Driving Diversion Program $251111 7/1/21114 False Alarm Fines 1st false alarm No(Jur r No()law 7/1/21)13 2nd false alarm No(.6119 No(.6,1,p, 7/1/2013 3rd false alarm $10)).110 7/1/21)13 4th false alarm 9150.00 7/1/2013 5th false alarm 5200.1111 7/1/2013 6 or more false alarms 925)100 7/1/21)13 Fingerprint Card $15.01)per card 7/1/21)12 Good Conduct Background/Letter S10.00 7/1/2012 Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act Qualification Fee 525.00 7/1/200(, Liquor License 525.1111 7/1012001 Police Services Fees DVD/Audio/VHS Evidence Copies 521100 7/1/2012 Police Documents/Reports 5111.011/for the first 15 pages and 7/1/21)08 $0.30/page thereafter Police Digital Photo CD Copies 511100/CD 7/1/2005 Police Photograph Copies $10.00/roll 7/1/21(03 Property Forfeiture for Criminal Activity Varies 5/25/1999 Second Hand Dealers and Transient Merchant License Occasional 541100 7/1/2010 Full-Time S100.0 7/1/2)110 Reporting Forms $0.80 each 7/1/2010 Special Event Permit Application Fee For-Profit Fee(Resident) $150.00 7/1/2015 For-Profit Fee(Non-Resident) $200.00 7/1/2015 Non-Profit Fee(Resident) $75.00 7/1/2015 Non-Profit Fee(Non-Resident) $125.00 7/1/2015 Social Gaming License Annual fee due January lit 5101 W)) 11'1/2014 I f a business applies on or after July 1st 550.00 7/1/2014 Vehicle Release Fee $125.01) 7/1/21)13 Page 8 Department Alit Revenue Source Fee or Charge 1111111111111111111111111=111k Effective Datil COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-BUILDING Building Permit Fees (New Commercial) 10/1/2009 Total Valuation: $0.00 to$500.00 $51.09 /minimum $500.01 to$2,000.00 $51.09 /for the first$500 and $2.69 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof. $2,000.01 to$25,000.00 $91.44 /for the first$2,000 and $10.76 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $25,000.01 to$50,000.00 $338.92 /for the first$25,000 and $8.06 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $50,000.01 to$100,000.00 $540.42 /for the first$50,000 and $5.38 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $100,000.01 and over $809.42 /for the first$100,000 and $4.49 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof (New Single Family&Multi-Family) 10/1/2009 Total Valuation: $0.00 to$2,000.00 $66.25 /minimum $2,000.01 to$25,000.00 $66.25 /for the first$2,000 and $11.48 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $25,000.01 to$50,000.00 $330.29 /for the first$25,000 and $8.75 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $50,000.01 to$100,000.00 $549.04 /for the first$50,000 and $6.25 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $100,000.01 to$250,000.00 $861.54 /for the first$100,000 and $4.46 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $250,000.01 to$500,000.00 $1,530.54 /for the first$250,000 and $4.42 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $500,000.01 to$1,000,000.00 $2,635.54 /for the first$500,000 and $4.10 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof Page 9 De.artment Reven ` urce Fee or Char•e Effective Date $1,000,000.01 to$2,000,000.00 $4,685.54 /for the first$1,000,000 and $3.33 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $2,000,000.01 and over $8,015.54 /for the first$2,000,000 and $3.18 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof (Additions,Alterations,and Demolitions for Single Family,Multi-Family,Commercial,&Industrial) 10/1/2009 Total Valuation: $0.00 to$500.00 $53.27 /minimum $500.01 to$2,000.00 $53.27 /for the first$500 and $3.39 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof $2,000.01 to$25,000.00 $104.12 /for the first$2,000 and $15.21 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $25,000.01 to$50,000.00 $453.95 /for the first$25,000 and $11.02 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $50,000.01 to$100,000.00 $729.45 /for the first$50,000 and $7.53 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $100,000.01 to$500,000.00 $1,105.95 /for the first$100,000 and $6.04 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $500,000.01 to$1,000,000.00 $3,521.95 /for the first$500,000 and $5.09 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $1,000,000.01 and over $6,066.95 /for the first$1,000,000 and $3.39 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof Building Plan Review Fee 65%of base building permit fee 9/26/2000 Deferred Submittals $200.00 minimum fee 9/24/2002 Plan Review plus 65%of building permit fee based on valuation of the particular portion or portions of the project. Phased Permitting $200.00 9/24/2002 Plan Review plus 100/o of building permit fee based on total project valuation not to exceed$1,500 for each phase Page 10 Department Revenue Source ilk Fee or Chargg jli Effective Date Photovoltaic Solar Panel System $180.00 (includes plan review and administrative fees) 1/1/2011 plus 12%state surcharge of permit fee Electrical Fees 10/1/2009 New residential,single or multi-family per dwelling unit;service included: 1000 square feet or less $168.54 Each additional 500 square feet or portion thereof $33.92 Limited energy,residential or multi-family $75.00 (with above sq ft) Each manufactured home or modular dwelling service or feeder $67.84 Services or feeders;installation,alterations or relocation: 200 amps or less $100.70 201 amps to 400 amps $133.56 401 amps to 600 amps $200.34 601 amps to 1000 amps $301.04 Over 1000 amps or volts $552.26 Reconnect only $67.84 Temporary services or feeders;installation,alteration or relocation: 200 amps or less $59.36 201 amps to 400 amps $125.08 401 amps to 600 amps $168.54 Branch circuits;new,alteration or extension per panel: With purchase of service or feeder-each branch circuit $7.42 Without purchase of service or feeder First Branch Circuit $56.18 Each addit.Branch circuit $7.42 Miscellaneous(service or feeder not included): Each pump or irrigation circuit $67.84 Each sign or outline lighting $67.84 Signal circuit(s)or a limited energy panel,alteration or extension $75.00 Each additional inspection over the allowable in any of the above Per Inspection $66.25 /hour(min 1 hour) Per Hour $66.25 /hour(min 1 hour) Industrial Plant Inspection $78.18 /hour(min 1 hour) Page 11 Department Revenue Source Fee or elm= Effective Dai Renewable Energy Electrical Fees: 5 kva or less $100.70 7/1/2012 5.01 to 15 kva $133.56 7/1/2012 15.01 to 25 kva $200.34 7/1/2012 Wind generation systems in excess of 25 kva: 25.01 to 50 kva $301.04 7/1/2012 50.01 to 100 kva $552.26 7/1/2012 >100 kva the permit fee shall be calculated in accordance with OAR 918-309-0040. Solar generation systems in excess of 25 kva: Each additional kva over 25 $7.42 7/1/2012 >100 kva no additional charge Each additional inspection over allowable in any of the above: Each additional inspection will be charged $66.25/hr 7/1/2012 at an hourly rate(1 hr minimum) Misc.fees at an hourly rate(1 hr minimum) $90.00/hr 7/1/2012 Electrical permit plan review fee 25%of the electrical permit fee Fire Protection Systems 10/1/2009 (Commercial Fire Suppression-Sprinkler,Alarm and Type I-Hood systems based on project valuation) Total Valuation: $0.00 to$500.00 $51.09 /minimum $500.01 to$2,000.00 $51.09 /for the first$500 and $2.69 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof $2,000.01 to$25,000.00 $91.44 /for the first$2,000 and $10.76 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $25,000.01 to$50,000.00 $338.92 /for the first$25,000 and $8.06 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $50,000.01 to$100,000.00 $509.42 /for the first$50,000 and $5.38 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof $100,000.01 and over $809.42 /for the first$100,000 and $4.49 /for each additional$1,000 or fraction thereof Page 12 Department Revenue Source 1= Fee or Charg& Effective Dail Fire Life Safety Plan Review 40%of base building permit fee 9/26/2000 LCommercial Only). Fire Protection Systems 10/1/2009 (Residential Fire Suppression) Stand Alone System Square Footage: 1 to 2,000 $198.75 2,001 to 3,600 $246.45 3601 to 7,200 $310.05 7,201 and over $404.39 Multipurpose or Continuous Loop System Square Footage: 0 to 2,000 $121.90 2,001 to 3,600 $169.60 3,601 to 7,200 $233.20 7,201 and over $327.54 Manufactured Dwelling Installation $305.50 9/24/2002 Manufactured Dwelling and Mobile Home Per OAR 9/24/2002 Parks,Recreation Camps, and Organizational Camps Mechanical Fees 10/1/2009 (1&2 Family Dwellings for New,Additions,or Alterations) Heating/Cooling: Air conditioning $46.75 Furnace 100,000 BTU(ducts/vents) $46.75 Furnace 100,000+BTU(ducts/vents) $54.91 Heat pump $61.06 Duct work $23.32. Hydronic hot water system $23.32 Residential boiler(radiator or hydronic) $23.32 Unit heaters(fuel-type,not electric), in-wall,in duct,suspended,etc. $46.75 Flue/vent for any of above $23.32 Other $23.32 Page 13 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date Other fuel appliances: Water heater $23.32 Gas fireplace $33.39 Flue/vent for water heater or gas fireplace $23.32 Log lighter(gas) $23.32 Wood/pellet stove $33.39 Wood fireplace/insert $23.32 Chimney/liner/flue/vent $23.32 Other $23.32 Environmental exhaust and ventilation: Range hood/other kitchen equipment $33.39 Clothes dryer exhaust $33.39 Single-duct exhaust(bathrooms, toilet compartments,utility rooms) $23.32 Attic/crawlspace fans $23.32 Other $23.32 Fuel piping: First four $14.15 Each additional $4.03 Minimum permit fee $90.00 Mechanical plan review fee 25°%o of Permit Fee Mechanical Permit Fees 10/1/2009 (Commercial and Multi-family) Total Valuation: $0.00 to$500.00 $69.06 /minimum $500.01 to$5,000.00 $69.06 /for the first$500 and $3.07 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof $5,000.01 to$10,000.00 $207.21 /for the first$5,000 and $2.81 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof $10,000.01 to$50,000.00 $347.71 /for the first$10,000 and $2.54 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof $50,000.01 to$100,000.00 $1,363.71 /for the first$50,000 and $2.49 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof $100,000.01 and over $2,608.71 /for the first$100,000 and $2.92 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof Plan Review 25%of permit fee 9/24/2002 Page 14 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date Plumbing Fees 10/1/2009 (Commercial,Industrial,Residential,&Multi-Family) New One&Two Family Dwellings 1 bath $312.70 2 bath $437.78 3 bath $500.32 Each additional bath/kitchen fixture $25.02 Site Utilities Catch basin or area drain $18.76 Drvwell,leach line,or trench drain $18.76 Footing drain,first 100' $50.03 Each additional 100'or part thereof (footing drain) $37.52 Manufactured home utilities $50.03 Manholes $18.76 Rain drain connector $18.76 Sanitary sewer, first 100' $62.54 Storm sewer,first 100' $62.54 Water service,first 100' $62.54 Each additional 100'or part thereof (sanitary,storm,water service) $37.52 Fixture or Item Backflow preventer $31.27 Backwater valve $12.51 Clothes washer $25.02 Dishwasher $25.02 Drinking fountain $25.02 Ejectors/sump $25.02 Expansion tank $12.51 Fixture/sewer cap $25.02 Floor drain/floor sink/hub $25.02 Garbage disposal $25.02 Hose bib $25.02 Ice maker $12.51 Interceptor/grease trap $25.02 Medical gas (value:$ ) see table Primer $12.51 Roof drain(commercial) $12.51 Sink/basin/lavatory $25.02 Solar units (potable water) $62.54 Tub/shower/shower pan $12.51 Page 15 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date Urinal $25.02 Water closet $25.02 Water heater $37.52 Water Piping/DWV $56.29 Other: $25.02 Minimum permit fee $72.50 Plumbing plan review 25%of permit fee Medical Gas Systems ') 14 1(1(11 Total Valuation: $1.00 to$5,000.00 $72.50 /minimum $5,000.01 to$10,000.00 $72.50 /for the first$5,000 and $1.52 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof,to and including$10,000. $10,000.01 to$25,000.00 $148.50 /for the first$10,000 and $1.54 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof,to and including$25,000. $25,000.01 to$50,000.00 $379.50 /for the first$25,000 and $1.45 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof,to and including$50,000. $50,000.01 and over $742.00 /for the first$50,000 and $1.20 /for each additional$100 or fraction thereof. Restricted Energy 6/27/2000 Residential Energy Use,for all systems combined $75.00 Commercial Energy Use, for each system $75.00 Sanitary Sewer Inspection Fee 6/6/2000 Residential $35.00 Commercial $45.00 Industrial $75.00 Site Work/Grading Permit Fees 10/1/2009 Based on project valuation-See Building Permit Fees(Nees Commerical). Page 16 Department Revenue Sourqdll Fee or Charge Effective Dal Miscellaneous Fees Administrative fee to change issued permits,including but not limited to: Address change(minimum charge-one-half hour) $90.00 per hour 7/1/2014 Contractor change(minimum charge-one-half hour) $90.00 per hour 7/1/2014 Process and handling fee to mail permits with plans $5.00 7/1/2014 Fee paid inspections for residential structures pursuant to Title 14,Chapter 16 6/27/2000 Single&Two Family Dwellings $100.00 Apartment Houses&Social Care Facilities $160.00 /plus$7 for each dwelling unit in excess of 3 Hotels $160.00 /plus$5 for each dwelling unit in excess of 5 Information Processing&Archiving(IPA)Fee $2.00 /sheet larger than 11"X 17" 7/1/2010 $0.50 /sheet 11"X 17"and smaller Investigation Fee $90.00 per hour(average cost) 1/1/2014 (minimum chage: one-half hour) Phased Occupancy $200.00 6/27/2000 Permit or Plan Review Extension $90.00 Temporary Occupancy $90.00 Other Inspections&Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours 10/1/2009 (minimum charge-2 hours) $90.00 per hour 2 Reinspection fees $90.00 per hour 10/1/2009 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically 10/1/2009 indicated(minimum charge:one-half hour) $90.00 per hour 4. Additional plan review required by changes, 10/1/2009 additions or revisions to plans(minimum charge:one-half hour) $90.00 per hour **A 12%surcharge fee as mandated by the State Building Codes Division is applied to all permit fees,investigation fees and inspection fees listed above. Page 17 Department Revenue Source -' ee or Charge Effective Da'_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING Accessory Residential Units $343.00 7/1/2014 Annexation $3,217.00 7/1/2014 Appeal Director's Decision(Type II)to Hearings Officer $292.00 7/1/2014 Expedited Review(Deposit) $351.00 7/1/2014 Hearings Referee $585.00 7/1/2014 Planning Commission/Hearing's Officer to City Council $3,234.00 7/1/2014 Approval Extension $343.00 7/1/2014 Colocation(of Wireless Communication Facilites) $52.00 7/1/2013 Conditional Use Initial $6,404.00 7/1/2014 Major Modification $6,404.00 7/1/2014 Minor Modification $701.00 7/1/2014 Design Evaluation Team(DET1 Recommendation(deposit) $1,788.00 7/1/2014 Development Code Provision Review Single-Family Building Plan $86.00 7/1/2014 New/Additions/Accessory(including,but not limited to,garages,carports,porches,patios,decks, storage sheds,awnings,steps and ramps) Commercial/Industrial/Institution-New $343.00 7/1/2014 Commercial/Industrial/Institution- Tenant Improvements in Existing Development Project Valuation up to 54,999 7/1/2014 Project Valuation S5,000-$74,999 586.00 7/1/2014 Project Valuation$75,000-$149,999 $215.00 7/1/2014 Project Valuation$150,000 and more $343.00 7/1/2014 Page 18 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Da Downtown Review Downtown Review Compliance Letter $701.00 7/1/2014 Downtown Design Administrative Review Under$1,000,000.00 $1,639.00 +0.004 x project valuation 7/1/2014 51,000,000.00 and over(max fee$25,000.00) $6,318.00 +0.002 x project valuation 7/1/2014 Downtown Design Review-Design Review Board $3,325.00 +applicable Type II fee 7/1/2014 Hearing Postponement $390.00 7/1/2014 Historic Overlay/Review District Historic Overlay Designation $5,007.00 7/1/2014 Removal Historic Overlay Designation $5,007.00 7/1/2014 Exterior Alteration in Historic Overlay District $751.00 7/1/2014 New Construction in Historic Overlay District $751.00 7/1/2014 Demolition in Historic Overlay District $751.00 7/1/2014 Home Occupation Permit Type] $118.00 7/1/2014 Type II $701.00 7/1/2014 Interpretation of the Community Development Code Director's Interpretation $701.00 7/1/2014 Appeal to City Council $3,234.00 7/1/2014 Land Partition Residential and Non-Residential(3 Lots) $4,634.00 7/1/2014 Residential and Non-Residential(2 Lots) $3,854.00 7/1/2014 Expedited 55,407.00 7/1/2014 Final Plat S1,076.00 7/1/2014 Lot Line Adjustment $701.00 7/1/2014 Minor Modification to an Approved Plan $701.00 7/1/2014 Non-Conforming Use Confirmation $701.00 7/1/2014 planned Development Conceptual Plan Review $9,068.00 7/1/2014 Detailed Plan Review(Concurrent Elearing) Applicable SDR Fee or Subdivision Fee+$439.00 7/1/2014 Detailed Plan Review(Separate Hearing) Applicable SDR Fee or Subdivision Fee+-$2,706.00 7/1/2014 Page 19 Department Revemturcc 111MIEr- 711 Pre-Application Conference S701.00 7/1/2014 Sensitive Lands Review With Excessive Slopes/Within Drainage Ways/ S701.00 7/1/2014 Within 100-Year Floodplain(Ivpe 1) With Excessive Slopes/Within Drainage Wall/ $3,076.00 7/1/2014 Within Wetlands(Type II) With Excessive Slopes/Within Drainage Ways/ S3,323.00 7/1/2014 Within Wetlands/Within the 100-Year Floodplain(Type III) Sign Permit Existing and Modification to an Existing Sign (No Size Differential) S192.00 7/1/2014 Temporary Sign(Per Sign) $61.00 7/1/2014 Site Development Review&Major Modification Under S1,000 000.00 $5,434.00 7/1/2014 S1,000,000.00/Over S7,059.00 7/1/2014 (+56.00/per each 510,000.00 over S1,000,000.00) Minor Modification $701.00 7/1/2014 Subdivision Preliminary Plat without Planned Development 56,273/+593.00 per lot 7/1/2014 Preliminary Plat with Planned Development $8,682.00 7/1/2014 I?xpedited Preliminary Plat without Planned Development S7,191.00 7/1/2014 Expedited Preliminary Plat with Planned Development S7,192.00 7/1/2014 Final Plat S2,169.00 7/1/2014 Plat Name Change S392.00 7/1/2014 Temporary Use Director's Decision S343.00 7/1/2014 Special Exemption/Non-Profit 50.00 7/1/2014 Special Mixed Use-Central Business District Zone Rate 1st Temporary Use in a Calendar Year S343.00 7/1/2014 2nd Through 5th Temporary Use With Substantially the Same Site Plan Within A Calendar Year 561.00 7/1/2014 Page 20 Department Revenue Source 171Mirtharge .1 at4 Urban Forestry, Type I Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of an Approved Land Use Permit $675.00 7/1/2014 Type III Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Permit with concurrent Type III review S422.00 7/1/2014 Type III Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Permit without concurrent Type III review $2,602.00 7/1/2014 Variance/Adjustment Administrative Variance $751.00 7/1/2014 Development Adjustment S343.00 7/1/2014 Special Adjustments Adjustment to a Subdivision $343.00 7/1/2014 Reduction of Minimum Residential Density $343.00 7/1/2014 Access/Egress Standards Adjustment $751.00 7/1/2014 Parking Adjustments Reduction in Minimum or Increase In Maximum Parking Ratio $751.00 7/1/2014 Reduction in New or Existing Development/Transit Imprvmnt $751.00 7/1/2014 Reduction in Bicycle Parking $751.00 7/1/2014 Alternative Parking Garage Layout $751.00 7/1/2014 Reduction in Stacking Lane Length $343.00 7/1/2014 Sign Code Adjustment $751.00 7/1/2014 Street Improvement Adjustment $751.00 7/1/2014 Wireless Communication Facility Adjustments Setback from Nearby Residence $751.00 7/1/2014 Distance from Another Tower $343.00 7/1/2014 Zoning Map/Text Amendment Legislative-Comprehensive flan $10,755.00 7/1/2014 Legislative-Community Development Code $4,391.00 7/1/2014 Quasi Judicial $4,046.00 7/1/2014 Zoning Analysis(Detailed). 5701.00 7/1/2014 Zoning Inquiry Letter(Simple) $103.00 7/1/2014 **Planning Fees include 14.76%Long Range Planning Surcharge per Ord 04-99 ac of 12/28/2004. Page 21 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- MISCELLANEOUS FEES&CHARGES Plan Copies $2.50 7/1/2007 Community Development Code CD Rom $10.00 Tigard Comprehensive Plan $75.00 7/1/2011 GIS Maps* 8-1/2"s 11" Non Aerial $2.50 7/1/2011 Aerial $4.00 7/1/2011 11"a 17" Non Aerial $5.00 7/1/2011 Aerial $7.00 7/1/2011 17"a 22" Non Aerial 511.00 7/1/2011 Aerial $15.00 7/1/2011 34"a 44" Non Aerial $25.00 7/1/2011 Aerial $30.00 7/1/2011 Custom Maps Staff Ilourly Rate Information Processing&Archiving(IPA)Fee Temporary Sign $5:00 7/1/2010 Type I Review $18.00 7/1/2010 Type II Review $175.00 7/1/2010 Type III Review S200.00 7/1/2010 Type IV Review $200.00 7/1/2010 Neighborhood Meeting Sims(Land Use) $2.00 1997 Oversize Load Permit $200.00 7/1/2005 Planimetric Maps Blucline print-quarter section 55.00 Mylar-quarter section $150.00 /+reproduction cost Retrieval of Materials C C. fiscated in ROW Lawn and A-board signs $40.00 /sign 7/1/2010 Other signs and materials(based on size and value) City Manager's Discretion 7/1/2010 (per TMC 7.61.035 Ord 10-06) Tigard Transportation System Plan $75.00 7/1/2011 Washington Square Regional Center 1999 Task Force Recommendations $10.00 Master Plan Map(Zoning/Plan) $2.50 Page 22 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge 1111.11111 Effective Date COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT Blasting Permit* $364.00 7/1/2014 Fee in Lieu of Sewer Based on actual cost of sewer connection, 1998 if sewer was available (MU-CBD zone only) the current Washington County Assessor-determined real market value of the land(not improvements)by 10%. Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee 90&41 / 7/1/'011 (This fee is determined by Clean Water Services. $5,000.00 /dwelling unit 7/1/2015 The City of Tigard receives 3.99%of fees collected.) Water Quality Facility Fee(Fee set by Clean Water Services) 6/6/2000 (City receives 100%of fees collected) Residential Single Family $225.00 /unit Commercial&Multi-family $225.00 /2,640 sq.ft of additional impervious surface Water Quantity Facility Fee(Fee set by Clean Water Services) 6/6/2000 (City receives 100%of fees collected) Residential Single Family $275.00 /unit Commercial&Multi-family $275.00 /2,640 sq.ft of additional impervious surface Metro Construction Excise Tax 12%of building permits for projects 7/1/2006 (City will retain 5%for administrative expenses) with a total valuation of$100,001 or more; (Tax set by Metro,but collected by cities) not to exceed$12,000. School District Construction Excise Tax (City will retain 4%for administrative expenses) (Tax set by school districts based on ORS 320.170-189 and collected by cities) Beaverton School District $1.17 /sq. ft.residential construction 7/1/2014 $0.58 /sq.ft.commercial construction 7/1/2014 Tigard-Tualatin School District $1.14 /sq.ft.residential construction 7/1/2014 $0.57 /sq.ft.commercial construction 7/1/2014 Page 23 department ,. Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Date COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT Urban Forestry, Hazard Tree Dispute Resolution Fee $165.00 +$55.00 each additional tree 3/1/2013 In Lieu of Planting Fees (Planting&3 Year Maintenance) Street Tree $537.00 per 1.5"caliper tree 3/1/2013 Open Grown Tree $537.00 per 1.5"caliper tree 3/1/2013 Stand Grown Tree $383.00 per tree 2'in height or 1 gallon container 3/1/2013 Tree Permit Fees(Complex) City Board or Committee $307.00"* City Manager No Charge 3/1/2013 Tree Canopy Fee $2.95 per square foot of tree canopy 3/1/2013 Urban Forest Inventory Fees Open Grown Tree $147.00 +$28.00 each additional tree 7/1/2014 Stand of Trees $195.00 +$44.00 each additional stand 7/1/2014 Tree Establishment Bond(Planting&Early Establishment) 1.5"Caliper Minimum Street or Open Grown Tree in Subdivisions or Minor Land Partitions $489.00 per tree 3/1/2013 1.5"Caliper Minimum Street or Open Grown Tree in Land Use Review Types other than Subdivisions or Minor Land Partitions $441.00 per tree 3/1/2013 2'in Height or 1 Gallon Container Minimum Stand Grown Tree in Subdivisions or Minor Land Partitions $367.00 per tree 3/1/2013 2'in Height or 1 Gallon Container Minimum Stand Grown Tree in Land Use Review Types other than Subdivisions or Minor Land Partitions $351.00 per tree 3/1/2013 Vacation(Streets and Public Access). $2,595.00 /deposit+actual costs 7/1/2014 *Per Ord 03-i9.lee is adjusted yearly based on the Construction(sect Inde.-c for the City of Seattle as published in the April issue of Engineering Nees Record and per Ore!04-99 includes the 14.76%Lon;Range Planning Surcharge. **,307.00 per tree up to and including 10 trees.if oiler 10 trees.the applicant submits a deposit of 8307.00 for each tree over 10 trees up to a maximum of 85000.00.The applicant it charged actual staff time to process the permit and will be refunded the balance of the deposit if ant remains after the review is complete Page 24 Chaste Effective Date PUBLIC WORKS Addressing Assignment Fee 550.(4) 10/29/2003 Community Garden Plot Rental Large 540.00 /year 7/1/2010 Small 52(4.04) /year 7/1/21)1)) Engineering Public Improvement Design Standards S5.000 For printed version only 7/15/1998 Local Improvement District Assessments Actual Cost 7/24/1996 Park Reservation Fees Application Fee Resident 525.14 4 /per event 7/1/2010 Non-Resident 550.00 /per event 7/1/2010 Rental Change Fee S15.00 /per event 7/1/2111 Organized Group Event Processing Fee 551.1114 /per event 7/1/2012 Event Monitor 515.00 /hour 7/1/2012 Special Use/Alcohol Permit Fee S25.0)1) /per event 7/1/2010 (Pee aoeoed al lime of trserralion) Special Event Permit Fee(First 3 hours) 575.00 1 to 100 people 7/1/2013 5175.011 101 to 200 people 7/1/2013 5275.1(1 201 to 500 people 7/1/2013 5475.(1(4 501 to 2110 people 7/1/2013 51001.011 2040 and more 7/1/2013 (Each Additional I[our) S25.00 (1 to 1(4)people 7/1/2013 S55.00 101 to 200 people 7/1/2013 590.00 201 to 500 people 7/1/2013 S155.00 501 to 2000 people 7/1/2013 S330.00 21)0)1 and more 7/1/2013 Shelter Rental Fees(2 hour minimum) Shelter#2 Resident 535.10 /hour 7/1/2f)12 Non-Resident 570.00 /hour 7/1/2012 Shelter#1,#3,#4,Bishop/Scheckla Pavilion,&Summerlake Resident 525.10 /hour 7/1/2012 Non-Resident 550.00 /hour 7/1/2012 Page 25 Effective D. :' Soccer/Ball Field Rental Fee(2 hour minimum) Resident S10.00 /hour 7/1/2010 Non-Resident 520.00 /hour 7/1/2010 Deposit May be required for some events to mitigate Not to exceed S400 7/1/2010 possible cleanup and/or damages. Reimbursement District Application Fee 53110.00 1/27/1998 Reimbursement District Fee Not to kxceed S6,000.00 unless reimbursement fee exceeds S15,000.00. 7/1/2001 Anv amount over 515,000.00 shall be reimbursed by the owner;56,000.00 limit valid for only 3 years from Council approval of district cost. Street Maintenance Fee(TMC 15.201 Monthly Residential Rate-Single and Multi-Family S(.12 $6.39 /unit 1/1/214-516 Monthly Non-Residential Rate S1.38 $1.44 /per min required parking space 1/1/214.5 16 Staff Review No Charge City Council Written Appeal Filing Fee 5300.00 Solid Waste Compactor Permit swim() Page 26 Department Revenue Source 41111111.11111111.1 Fee or Charge 1111. Effective Date PUBLIC WORKS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING Erosion Control Inspection Fee With Development Construction Cost Estimate$0-$25,000 $80.70 7/1/2014 Construction Cost Estimate$25,001-$50,000 $107.60 7/1/2014 Construction Cost Estimate$50,001-$100,000 $161.40 7/1/2014 Construction Cost Estimate over$100,000 $161.40 plus$75 per$100,000 or fraction thereof 7/1/2014 exceeding the first$100,000 Without Development 0-0.99acres $322.80 7/1/2014 lacre of greater $322.80 plus$150 per acre or fraction thereof 7/1/2014 Reinspection Fee $96.84 per hour with a minimum of 1 hour 7/1/2014 Plan Check included in inspection fee 7/1/2014 Plan Resubmittal Review $96.84 per hour with a minimum of 1/2 hour 7/1/2014 Fee In Lieu Of Bicycle Striping 8-inch white stripe $2.69 /linear foot of frontage 7/1/2014 Bike lane legends $188.30 /each 7/1/2014 Directional mini-arrows $107.60 /each 7/1/2014 Mono-directional reflective markers $4.30 /each 7/1/2014 Fee In Lieu Of Undergrounding $35.00 /lineal feet of frontage 10/29/2003 Public Facility Improvement Permit 2%plan review plus 7/1/2009 5%of estimated cost of public improvement with a 7/1/2005 $300 minimum Streetlight Energy&Maintenance Fee Based upon PGE Schedule#95 Option"A" for the first two years costs 2000 Traffic/Pedestrian Signs Cost of materials and labor 2/7/2002 Page 27 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Authority Effective Date PUBLIC WORKS-UTILITIES Booster Pump Charge Meter Size(diameter inches) 5/8x3/4 54.86 /monthly 1/1/2014 S5.15 /monthly 1/1/2015 3/4 x 3/4 57.00 /monthly 1/1/2014 S7.42 /monthly 1/1/2015 1 S12.95 /monthly 1/1/2014 S13.72 /monthly 1/1/2015 1.5 538.83 /monthly 1/1/2014 541.16 /monthly 1/1/2015 2 563.04 /monthly 1/1/2014 $66.82 /monthly 1/1/2015 3 $111.16 /monthly 1/1/2014 $117.83 /monthly 1/1/2015 4 5227.97 /monthly 1/1/2014 $241.65 /monthly 1/1/2015 6 S242.67 /monthly 1/1/2014 S257.23 /monthly 1/1/2015 8 $388.27 /monthly 1/1/2014 S411.57 /monthly 1/1/2015 10 S758.59 /monthly 1/1/2014 $804.11 /monthly 1/1/2015 12 $1,092.36 /monthly 1/1/2014 S1,157.91 /monthly 1/1/2015 Page 28 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Authority Effective Date Customer Charge (Basic fee charged to customers to have the City,deliver water.) Meter Size(diameter inches) 5/8 x 3/4 S25.83 /monthly 1/1/2015 S26.67 /monthly 1/1/2016 S27.54 /monthly 1/1/2017 S28.44 /monthly 1/1/2018 S29.36 /monthly 1/1/2019 3/4 x 3/4 S37.21 /monthly 1/1/2015 S38.42 /monthly 1/1/2016 S39.67 /monthly 1/1/2017 S40.96 /monthly 1/1/2018 S42.29 /monthly 1/1/2019 1 S57.96 /monthly 1/1/2015 S59.84 /monthly 1/1/2016 S61.78 /monthly 1/1/2017 S63.79 /monthly 1/1/2018 S65.86 /monthly 1/1/2019 1.5 S153.05 /monthly 1/1/2015 S158.02 /monthly 1/1/2016 S163.16 /monthly 1/1/2017 S168.46 /monthly 1/1/2018 S173.93 /monthly 1/1/2019 2 S248.32 /monthly 1/1/2015 S256.39 /monthly 1/1/2016 5264.72 /monthly 1/1/2017 S273.32 /monthly 1/1/2018 S282.20 /monthly 1/1/2019 Page 29 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Authority Effective Date 3 S488.77 /monthly 1/1/2015 S504.66 /monthly 1/1/2016 S521.06 /monthly 1/1/2017 S537.99 /monthly 1/1/2018 S555.47 /monthly 1/1/2019 4 S928.43 /monthly 1/1/2015 S958.60 /monthly 1/1/2016 S989.75 /monthly 1/1/2017 S1,021.92 /monthly 1/1/2018 S1,055.13 /monthly 1/1/2019 6 S1,041.00 /monthly 1/1/2015 S1,074.83 /monthly 1/1/2016 S1,109.76 /monthly 1/1/2017 S1,145.83 /monthly 1/1/2018 S1,183.07 /monthly 1/1/2019 8 S1,625.84 /monthly 1/1/2015 S1,678.68 /monthly 1/1/2016 S1,733.24 /monthly 1/1/2017 S1,789.57 /monthly 1/1/2018 S1,847.73 /monthly 1/1/2019 10 S3,000.08 /monthly 1/1/2015 S3,097.58 /monthly 1/1/2016 S3,198.25 /monthly 1/1/2017 S3,302.19 /monthly 1/1/2018 S3,409.51 /monthly 1/1/2019 12 S4,244.91 /monthly 1/1/2015 S4,382.87 /monthly 1/1/2016 S4,525.31 /monthly 1/1/2017 S4,672.38 /monthly 1/1/2018 S4,824.23 /monthly 1/1/2019 Page 30 Department Revenue S Fee or Charge 1 Authority Effective Date Final Notification Process Fee S30.00 /per instance 7/1/2009 Fire Hydrant Flow Test S325.00 /test 12/9/2008 Fire Hydrant Usage-Temporary 3"hydrant meter deposit* S650.00 9/1/2002 *Deposit is refundable if returned in good condition Hook-up service S50.00 2/27/2001 Continued use S50.00 /month 2/27/2001 Consumption Current irrigation water usage rate 9/1/2002 per 100 cubic feet of water used Fire Rates(Sprinklers) 6"or smaller S17.70 /mcnath 7/1/2013 $18.16 /month 7/1/2015 8"or larger S23.12 4frifiittit 7/1/2013 $24.03 /month 7/1/2015 Fire Service Connection S1,157.10 /+ 12%fcc baacd 7/1/2013 $1,495.29 /+12%fee based 7/1/2015 on construction costs. Meter Disconnection Actual labor and material costs+100/0 9/1/2002 Meter Installation Fees 5/8"x 3/4"Meter S350.00 9/1/2011 3/4"x 3/4"Meter S400.00 10/1/2011 1"Meter S550.00 9/1/2011 1 1/2"Meter S850.00 9/1/2011 2"Meter S1,100.00 9/1/2011 3"or more Meter Actual labor&materials+ 10% 9/1/2011 Meter Out-of-Order Test Meter calibration cost+actual labor 9/1/2002 and material costs+ 10% Sanitary Sewer Service(Fee set by Clean Water Services), (City receives 16.306%of fees collected) Bas,GLar 525.83 7drovel4irtg-tititt-Amerrth 7/1/2014 U..e Chars, S1.72 7/1/2011 Base Charge(Pending CWS Hearing) $26.63 /dwelling unit/month 7/1/2015 Use Charge(Pending CWS Hearing) $1.77 /100 cubic feet/month for 7/1/2015 individual customer winter average Page 31 ty Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Authority Effective D P g Service Installation Fees Single Trench-Single Residential Service $3,630.00 includes labor&materials 10/1/2011 1 1/2"Meter and greater Actual labor and material costs+10% 10/1/2011 Storm and Surface Water(Fee set by Clean Water Services) (City retains 75%of Service Charge fees collected) (City retains 100%of its Surcharge fees collected) C_rgc 56.75/E Uaisittit 7/1/2011 Service Charge(Pending CWS Hearing) $7.25 /ESU/month 7/1/2015 Tigard Surcharge $2.00 /ESU/month 7/1/2009 Water Bacteriological Quality Testing Cost per test $60.00 7/1/2008 Water Disconnection Charge for Non-payment During business hours $50.00 2/27/2001 Water Line Construction-New Development 12%of Actual Cost 2/27/2001 Water Main Extension Designed and installed by others 12%of Actual Cost 9/1/2002 Water Usage Charges Residential Tier I S3.34 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 2 S4.88 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 3 S5.58 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 1 S3.45 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 2 $5.04 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 3 55.76 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 1 $3.56 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 2 $5.20 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 3 $5.95 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 1 $3.68 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier 2 $5.37 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier 3 $6.14 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier I $3.80 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Tier 2 $5.54 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Tier 3 $6.34 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Page 32 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Authority Effective D4 Multi-Family Tier 1 S2.78 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 2 S4.06 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 3 S4.65 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 1 S2.87 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 2 S4.19 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 3 S4.80 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 1 S2.96 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 2 S4.33 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 3 54.96 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 1 S3.06 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier 2 54.47 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier 3 S5.12 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier 1 S3.16 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Tier 2 S4.62 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Tier 3 S5.29 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Commercial Tier 1 S3.44 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2014 Tier 2 S5.01 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2014 Tier 3 S5.73 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2014 Tier 1 S3.80 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 2 S5.54 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 3 S6.33 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2015 Tier 1 S3.92 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 2 S5.72 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 3 S6.54 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2016 Tier 1 S4.05 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 2 S5.91 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 3 $6.75 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2017 Tier 1 S4.18 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier 2 S6.10 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Tier 3 S6.97 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2018 Page 33 De.artment Revenue Source Fee or Char•e tive Date Tier 1 54.32 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Tier 2 S6.30 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Tier 3 57.20 /100 cubic feet of water 1/1/2019 Industrial Uniform Rate S5.29 /monthly 1/1/2015 55.46 /monthly 1/1/2016 S5.64 /monthly 1/1/2017 S5.82 /monthly 1/1/2018 S6.01 /monthly 1/1/2019 Irrigation Uniform Rate S7.51 /monthly 1/1/2015 57.75 /monthly 1/1/2016 58.00 /monthly 1/1/2017 5826 /monthly 1/1/2018 58.53 /monthly 1/1/2019 Tiered Rate Structure Thresholds(100 cubic feet of water) Meter Size 5/8 x 3/4 Tier 1 6 ccf Tier 2 15 ccf Tier 3 over 15 ccf 3/4 x 3/4 Tier 1 9 ccf Tier 2 22 ccf Tier 3 over 22 ccf 1 Tier 1 16 ccf Tier 2 40 ccf Tier 3 over 40 ccf 1.5 Tier 1 48 ccf Tier 2 120 ccf Tier 3 over 120 ccf 2 Tier 1 78 ccf Tier 2 195 ccf Tier 3 over 195 ccf 3 Tier 1 137 ccf Tier 2 344 ccf Tier 3 over 344 ccf Page 34 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge uthority Effective Date 4 Tier 1 282 ccf Tier 2 705 ccf Tier 3 over 705 ccf 6 Tier 1 300 ccf Tier 2 750 ccf Tier 3 over 750 ccf 8 Tier 1 480 ccf Tier 2 1,200 ccf Tier 3 over 1,200 ccf 10 Tier 1 938 ccf Tier 2 2,345 ccf Tier 3 over 2,345 ccf 12 Tier 1 1,350 ccf Tier 2 3,376 ccf Tier 3 over 3,376 ccf Page 35 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Effective Datil COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING Park System Development Charge(SDC)* Single Family Unit $6,451.34 ?/1/2014 Multi-family Unit $5,156.28 7/1/2014 Commercial/industrial(per employee) $446.14 7/1/2014 *See Appendix for methodology used to calculate the charges. The Park System Development Charge(Park SDC)is a City of Tigard charge that is assessed on new development to support the acquisition and development of parks,greenways,and paved trails,all of which are used by residents of Tigard and by those who work here. The Park SDC is a one-time fee charged to new development to help pay a portion of the costs associated with building additional parks and trails to meet the needs created by both residential and commercial/industrial growth. The SDC revenues can only he used on capacity-increasing capital improvements and cannot be used to repair existing park facilities. Park SDCs are assessed on new residential development on a per-unit basis and against commercial and industrial development on a per-employee basis. The amount of the charge for each land use category is adjusted each year,effective July 1st,in relation to two indices,one reflecting changes in development/construction costs and one reflecting changes in land acquisition costs. For information about Park SDCs regarding a specific project contact the City's Permits/Projects Coordinator at 503-718-2426. For more detailed and updated information on calculating Park SDC's see"Report for Parks& Recreation System Development Charge Study,"by FCS Group,March 23,2012. Page 36 De artment Revenue Sour: Fee or Char_a Effective Date Park SDC Annual Adjustment 4/10/2001 Parks SDC fees shall be adjusted annually on July 1st of each year beginning in 2011. The new fee will be determined by multiplying the existing fees by the average of two indices,one reflecting changes in development/construction costs and one reflecting changes in land acquisition costs. The average of these two indices is a reasonable approach because the Parks SDC fee is roughly split 50%between land acquisition land development components. The index for the Land Acquisition component will be the base cost for residential tract land in Tigard,as determined by the Washington County Appraiser. The average cost for residential tract land was selected because it is readily identified and is the lowest priced of the buildable lands in Tigard. Changes in this base cost can be calculated in terms of a percentage increase,to create the level of change to the original index,and projected to the overall acquisition cost. In accordance with Measure 5,the Washington County Appraiser's office will determine appraised values on July 1 of each year. The index for the Land Development component of the Parks SDC will be the Construction Cost Index for the City of Seattle as published in the May issue of the Engineering News Record(ENR). The Seattle cost index will be used because the city is the geographically closest to Tigard of twenty metropolitan areas for which the ENR maintains cost data. This index is adjusted monthly,quarterly,and annually. The annual index for each year will be selected beginning with the index for May 2012. The revised Parks SDC fees were derived from the costs of land and projects provided in the Tigard Park System Master Plan Update,adopted July 2009 and the Tigard Greenway Trails Master Plan adopted in July 2011. The costs for projects in both plans were adjusted using both the Land Acquisition and Land Development indices for the appropriate years. Park SDC Annual Adjustment(cont.) Calculation Definitions: SDC(2012) = Current SDC fee L(2012) _ Average cost of residential tract land 2012 L(2013) = Average cost of residential tract land 2013 L(2xxx)= Average cost of residential tract land 2xxx C (2012) = Construction cost index of 2012 C(2013)= Construction cost index of 2013 C(2xax) = Construction cost index of 2xxx LCI= Land Cost Index:change from the current year from previous year CCI = Construction Cost Index:change from the current year from previous year ACI= Average cost index change of LCI +CCI Page 37 Department Revenue Source Mit Fee or Charge Effective Date Formula: L(2014)/L(2013) =LCI and C(2014) /C(2013) =CCI therefore LCI +CCI/2 =ACI then SDC(2014)X ACI =SDC(2015) Each year subsequent to 2002,the costs shall be revised using the current year and previous year's data. Not withstanding the foregoing,all calculations shall be carried out to the thousandth place. A final product ending in.49 or less shall be rounded down to the nearest dollar,.50 or more up to the next dollar. Page 38 Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge Authority Revised Fees Effective Dal PUBLIC WORKS-WATER Water System Development Charge(SDC)* 5/8" x 3/4"Meter $7,014 2/1/2014 $7,580 7/1/2014 $7,777 7/1/2015 3/4"x 3/4"Meter $10,114 2/1/2011 $10,916 7/1/2011 $11,200 7/1/2015 1" Meter $18,791 2/1/2011 $20,220 -/1/2011 $20,746 7/1/2015 1 1/2"Meter $56,313 2/1/2011 $60;625 7/1/2011 $62,201 7/1/2015 2" Meter $94490 _/1/2011 $ 8,413 7/1/2011 $101,003 7/1/2015 3" Meter 3173,599 7/1/2011 $178,113 7/1/2015 4" Meter $356,032 7/1/2011 $365,289 7/1/2015 6" Meter 1378,991 7/1/2011 $388,848 7/1/2015 8" Meter $606389 7/1/2011 $622,155 7/1/2015 Water system connections greater than 8 inch diameter,City mill forecast the demands on an average-day,peak-day,and peak-hour basis to determine SDC fees. *Ar per ORS 223.304(8)Res. 10-76.the City will use ENR Seattle CCI for the month of Apyil prior to the budgetyear imposed. The ENR Seattle CCI fbr April-2015 is 2.6% based on a 12-month average. The multiplier 1.026 is rued for all Water SDCs effective 7/1/2015. Page 39 Department Revenue Source 11=lir Fee or Charge-AM Authority Effective Date COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING Countywide Transportation Development Tax(TDT)-(Example Land Uses and Charges*) Single Family Detached $6,6655..00/er-unit 7/1/2011 $87.936.00{per-mitt 10/1/2011. $8,113.00 /per unit 7/1/2015 Apartment 51,Z25-..00 4rer unit 7/1/2011 $55,,257.89 per unit 10/1/2011. $5,308.00 /per unit 7/1/2015 Residential Condominium/Townhouse X6.99 /firer-unit 7/1/2011 84;806.00{per-urn 10/1/2011 $4,853.00 /per unit 7/1/2015 General Office Building $6;869.00{per TSFC FA**) 7/1/2011 X433.90(perTSFCFA**) 10/1/2011 $8,515.00 (per TSFGFA**) 7/1/2015 Shopping Center X968.99 (per TtTCL,.\**) 7/1/2011 X034.90 (per TSFCLA**) 44/442044 $11,140.00 (per TSFGLA**) 7/1/2015 The Countywide Transportation Development Tax(IDT)is a Washington County Tax approved by the voters in November,2008,that is administered and collected by the City of Tigard. It went into effect on July 1,2009,replacing the Traffic Impact Fee(TIF)program. Like TIF,TDT is assessed on new development to help provide funds for the increased capacity transportation improvements needed to accommodate the additional vehicle traffic and demand for transit facilities generated by that development. It provides funds for these capacity improvements to county and city arterials,certain collectors,and certain state and transit facilities as listed in the County's Capital Improvements Project List. The TDT is categorized as an Improvement Fee:revenue must be dedicated to capital improvements that expand capacity and may not be used for maintenance, repair,or other non-capital improvements. 1DTs are assessed on new development on a per-unit basis. For residential uses the units are dwelling units,bedrooms,etc. For commercial and industrial uses the units are the square footage of the use or units unique to the use such as lanes,fueling positions,etc. The TDT rate for each land use category is adjusted each year,effective July 1st. The rates for each year from July 1,2009 through June 30,2013 were established by Washington County Engrossed Ordinance 691,effective 7/1/09. Effective December 1,2009,Ordinance 729 implemented a 10% discount to the rates from July 1,2010 through June 30,2013. Effective January 17,2012,Ordinance 746 extended the discount period through June 30, 2015. Those discounts will expire effective June 30,2015. Effective July 19,2012,Ordinance 751 established a discount of 50%or 75%for the redevelopment of up to 5,000 square feet of existing non-residential properties. This redevelopment discount was made permanent by Ordinance 793, effective August 5,2014. For information about the TDT regarding a specific project contact the City's Permits/Projects Coordinator at(503)718-2426. Page 40 * For more detailed information on calculating TDT charges and a detailed list of Land Uses and TDT charges through 6/30/2013 see Appendix B to Washington County Engrossed Ordinance 691,August 29,2008 and the Washington County Countywide Transportation Development Tax Manual. ** TSFGFA =thousand square feet gross floor area;TSFGI.;\ =thousand square feet gross leasable area. Page 41 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-D- CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: May 12, 2015 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: '‘..V\ �2 �� J `� `c-"'t Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will �( �� , help the presiding officer pronounce: 1 4_ Address \>r q‘, (-f.-L° ■°v) City �∎Ci State SI II, Zip C( ? Phone No. 5 © 77 z 0 (E7- Name: ci -r-cOv /1" del Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will ,,[ help the presiding officer pronounce: (/1 (0)( fl giro (!r„ T> q 4 -4( 7,e, r 140 yyret- Addres V/..—7 5 5<<?!, t9401 ei Q` !7� City 77 GG a 5Tee (51 State _ � Zip 7 7 2 2i Phone No. Name: wry& 1 40 yy Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address /�j S.-3 144 V ofiet hive City �1� 2-?State Zip Phone No. c33-- / 9524 CITIZEN COMMUNICATION 1:\ADM\CATHY\000 City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\citizen communication 150414.doc AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-D- CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: May 12, 2015 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: &? '/ e_ h C�la rn d- Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address G f./7/ 2- SO. /`p S7 City l/ zcd State {Y 0e Zip 0202.3 Phone No. 5`a3— 9/92- Name: -774- A4144 �,J Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: yMC4 Address 2 _la 4 ZAJZ 7et City ( -f State OZ Zip Phone No. 2 7S XName: g f/e---7-19A5\54/Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will yA4 help the presiding officer pronounce: Address I ZbS (,t.D cti- C ti City 1 State L4R_ Zip et 7 2 9 Phone No. 503 CITIZEN COMMUNICATION 1:\ADM\CATHY\000 City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\citizen communication 150414.doc AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-D- CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: May 12, 2015 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: CpY Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: r cA Address 13-- o Sw C2e '4/.. Lae I, City State D- Zip a?'Z�3 \� Phone No. Name: 6-tc / A'W S Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will S( cf—f"t( (�0 help the residing officer ronounce: - 1,,,4 et grafig G(4 K 1-14 Address (-)( c 6 R -SW102 SZ ('L. City 6-447_6 n (' State 0(L Zip V • Phone No. 5 Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION 1:\ADM\CATHY\GOO City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\citizen communication 150414.doc SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR To All Those Concerned, (DATE OP MEETING) It has come to the attention of the youth of this great city that our City Council will soon decide what actions, if any at all, will be taken in regards to the partial funding and support of a YMCA Recreation Center. This decision will affect many of us directly, and many more to come indirectly. As such, it was decided that our input and advisement be formally put into writing for the Mayor and Council to consider. We, the youth,firmly support the creation of a YMCA, and further encourage the City of Tigard to locate this great facility in downtown Tigard for the following reasons: This facility will bring thousands of visitors into downtown Tigard monthly and help the local businesses gain recognition and customers. This location ties into the City of Tigard's mission of being the most walkable community in the Northwest. This location will make downtown Tigard the center of the city, which we have lacked for so long. The YMCA is very affordable, and offers discounted rates for many of its members. We, the youth realize that we do not have a vote but encourage the City of Tigard to know that this does not make our input worthless. Our generation is the future of this city, so why would we not have any say in how we think it will become a city worth staying in or moving to? The Youth Advisory Council, and Tigard High School urge the city to put the YMCA to vote so the people of this city can show our support. City Council is supposed to address the needs of the people, not the wants of . other cities, big for-profit businesses, or City Staff ifr SeA 414 (.4z/ 74 /' G...5101\ r\ 16flifiU di/Mg- 67W1AA tor, n �1 tTu ` // // SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET City Council Update May 2015 FOR /W44/ Chamber Events (DATE OF MEETING) Good Morning Tigard (GMT),Thursday A.M. Networking 7:30 a.m.—Weekly • 5/14/15—Hosted by American Cancer Society @ Tigard Chamber • 5/21/15—Hosted by Columbia Bank King City @ their location • 5/28/15—Hosted by Hudson Plaza • 6/4/15- Hosted by Willamette Technical @ Tigard Chamber Other • Shining Stars was held Friday 4/24/15—Well attended and great event,thank you all to all our attendees, award winners,sponsor and donors. We couldn't do it without you. • 5/15/15—TYP and YPLO networking with Grease at the Broadway Rose • 5/19/15—5:30—7 p.m. Cheers After Hours, location and host TBD • 5/21/15—4-5 p.m. Monthly Home, Garden and Design Referrals Group—3rd Thursdays • 5/27/15—Young Professionals Educate @8—Putting Failure in Its Place—Oswego Lake Country Club Check our event calendar at http://business.tigardchamber.org/events/calendar/for locations and hosting companies Tigard Farmers Market Update • Wednesdays at the Tigard Grange 3-7 p.m.through end of August • Opened Downtown Sunday Market on Mother's Day May 10th.—Strawberries are in, come join us! Downtown Updates • 3rd Friday is 5/15/15, come Explore Downtown Tigard • Excited about the buzz that the TDA sourced glass baskets, bike racks, fixtations, additional benches, Art Walk, pop up gallery and urban art are bringing to Downtown!!!! • If you haven't come to see the urban art,the art in 24 downtown businesses, or the pop up gallery,then do it before this Friday and cast your vote for people's choice! Learn what there is to do in Downtown Tigard on Facebook at www.facebook.com/exploredowntowntigard and at www.exploredowntowntigard.com TU ARD AREA oWN �` � � �� •= Explore FAemERS DoWNT tigardyoungprofessionak MARKET 41� Ti'_ard W4,1- � e "so - ! connect collect colb b t;,Tboc•t. d n SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR May 12th City Update (DATE OF MEETING) Tigard High School Envoy(s):Carter Kruse,Shaina Azbari,Lauren Brown • Badminton Tournament number 2 was a booming success! • Last Friday was the Sparrow Basketball tournament which was a fundraiser for Jair our Sparrow. All week we have had a fundraiser at powerhouse coffee and we raised over$480 for the Sparrow. • This last week was also the Tigard High play Alice in Wonderland. It was such an amazing performance by very talented students, and many Seniors said farewell to their high school performances. • Tiger Pride week was last week. We honored students in the categories of Service, Tiger Pride, Most Improved, 3.75 GPA and Attendance. There was a fantastic assembly to recognize those students, as well as our retiring principal. I had the pleasure of announcing to him and the school that June 9th would be named in his honor to thank him for all his work in the Tigard Tualatin School District. • This week at Tigard is Teacher Appreciation. We get a chance to say thanks to those who give so much and ask for little in return. Tigard High School is successful because of the incredible enthusiasm and dedication of the Teachers at Tigard High. Staff came into school today to find all their favorite cereals as well as otherr breakfast foods provided by Tigard Leadership. • Prom is this coming Saturday at the Montgomery Park Atrium. The theme is City of Roses to play along with the Portland theme. • Canned Food Drive has been going on since April 29th and continues. We have over a thousand dollars in monetary donations and are still hoping for more! If you or anyone you know would like to donate either cans or money,please put them in contact with myself or Shaina. • Speaking of May 13th, on that same day the Tigard Tualatin Dodge ball tournament will be held at Tigard High School at 6. The cost is $3 to come watch, we hope you will consider coming! • Today is my final report as your Tigard High School envoy! • Introduction: Shaina Azbari, your 2015-2016 ASB President. 1 AIS-2244 3.A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes):Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes Submitted By: Carol Krager,City Management Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Approve City Council meeting minutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve minutes as submitted. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached council minutes are submitted for City Council approval: •March 17, 2015 OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments No file(s)attached. City of Tigard • Tigard Business/Workshop Meeting Minutes TIGARD March 17, 2015 1. BUSINESS/WORKSHOP MEETING El Imo! A. At 6:30 p.m. Mayor Cook called the City Council meeting to order. B. City Recorder Krager called the roll: Present Absent Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ C. Mayor Cook asked those attending to stand and join him for the Pledge of Allegiance. D. Mayor Cook called for non agenda items. There were none. 2. CONTINUATION OF QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING — ZCA2014-00002 SUMMIT RIDGE NO. 5 a. El Mayor Cook opened the public hearing continued from February 10,2015. He announced that the public testimony was closed. Next on the agenda is the staff report and council deliberation. b. Staff Report—Associate Planner Floyd gave the staff report. He said staff was returning with a revised application submitted to the city and that after some negotiation has staff support. At issue at the February 10, 2015, public hearing was the two property owners were seeking to annex their undeveloped property but not their individual homes. This was problematic because of the city's policy 14.2.4 regarding logical and efficient boundaries. After the hearing staff discussed a proposal from the applicants for an annexation contract that would bring the properties into the city within five years. After discussions involving staff and the City Attorney, the applicants have agreed to a four-year annexation period. The applicant has also provided signed copies of the contracts to annex. Councilor Snider clarified that staff had concerns earlier and did not recommend approval. He noted the new documents indicate movement on one or two points and asked if staff is TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 1 of 13 now recommending approval.Associate Planner Floyd said that they were recommending approval of this compromise. He said the concern will be resolved in the future when these two properties come into the city. In response to a question from Councilor Henderson on the timing,Associate Planner Floyd said the city can annex them in four years if the property owners do not annex prior. City Attorney clarified that the words, "upon sale of the property" are not in the agreement. Mr. Floyd said the contracts are binding upon all owners. City Attorney Ramis gave a procedural announcement that given the new document being introduced anyone can testify specifically to that document. Mayor Cook asked if anyone present wanted to testify. Michael Robinson spoke on behalf of Kelly Ritz of Venture Properties. He said the city has agreements signed by the Zeiders and Andersons. The agreements run with the land and bind the current owners or go to any purchasers. The properties may be annexed sooner. He said Venture Properties agrees with the staff report and hopes council follows the staff recommendation to approve. ElMayor Cook said this agreement states they have up to four years to annex but asked what happens if one annexes and creates an island of the other. "Would the city have to wait four years to annex the island?" City Attorney Ramis replied that this agreement does not cause the city to waive any other rights it has under the statute. Councilor Henderson asked if the tax deferrals are still in place if the city initiates the annexation. City Attorney Ramis said he did not think that provision would apply because the tax deferral program is an incentive for voluntary annexation. c. Council questions. There were no additional questions. d. Mayor Cook closed the public hearing. e. Council consideration: Councilor Woodard moved for approval of Ordinance No. 15-04. Council President Snider seconded the motion. Mayor Cook asked if there was any discussion and there was none. City Recorder Krager read the number and title of the ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 15-04 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SUMMIT RIDGE 5 ANNEXATION (ZCA2014-00002),CONSISTING OF THREE PARCELS OF LAND APPROXIMATELY 5.34 ACRES IN SIZE,AND WITHDRAWING PROPERTY FROM THE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT,WASHINGTON COUNTY ENHANCED SHERIFF'S PATROL DISTRICT AND WASHINGTON COUNTY URBAN ROADS MAIN PENANCE DISTRICT TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 2 of 13 Mayor Cook asked City Recorder Krager to take a roll call vote. Yes No Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Mayor Cook announced that Ordinance No. 15-04 was adopted by a unanimous vote. 3. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance, Parks Manager Martin, Streets and Transportation Project Engineer McCarthy and FCS Consultant Chase presented this item. A Power Point slide show was given. IGJ Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said this is a continuation of a discussion held with council in February on System Development Charges. Staff received some direction from council on some key aspects on citywide and River Terrace SDCs. Council said they wanted to go with the model in the River Terrace Funding Strategy which means that parks will continue to have a city-wide SDC paid by developers for development in the City of Tigard,plus an overlay for River Terrace paid by River Terrace developers for parks in the River Terrace area. For transportation, the city will be creating a transportation SDC citywide plus an overlay paid by developers for River Terrace that just helps fund transportation infrastructure in that area. Staff wants to discuss and receive direction from council on three additional items to keep the process moving towards an April 28 public hearing on fees, and to keep the commitment to allow developers to break ground this summer. • New concept of an improvement portion and a reimbursement portion of the Parks SDC. • SDC credit policy and whether or not to use standard methodology • Transit Oriented Development (TOD) relating to the Transportation SDC A Parks reimbursement SDC allows future residents to pay for improvements that existing residents have helped make happen. Parks Manager Martin said one reason staff is interested in council consideration of a reimbursement SDC is that it allows future residents to buy back into what the existing residents have purchased. Examples include trails, footbridges, tennis courts and other amenities current residents have paid for that future residents will use. This fee will allow improvements over time. It helps address overall funding needs rather than just those for building TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 3 of 13 new parks. He said there is currently $13.5 million in excess capacity and the SDCs take into account the bond. Residents will not pay twice on the bond. Mayor Cook said he understands that new residents have not paid for the existing infrastructure,but gave a scenario of a current Tigard resident moving to another part of the city. They have already paid for the parks bond. They sell their current house and that new resident will not have to pay,yet the moving resident will have to pay the SDC. Mr. LaFrance responded that the process is blind to individuals and what triggers it is that a new home has been added,whether or not it is occupied by a current resident. The home will have a family of one person or many, and they will have the opportunity to use the parks and will benefit that we have overbuilt the system by $13.5 million. Mayor Cook said it causes a double cost to a resident moving within the city. Consultant Chase said SDCs are paid up front so they might be included in the mortgage so they are getting a tax deduction. On average,people move every five years. He said it is the one chance to get that fee when the home is built. Councilor Woodard commented that an individual does not have to move into a brand new home; they could purchase an existing property. It is a choice they make. A discussion was held on the reimbursement portion of the Parks SDC and council gave their approval. Mr. LaFrance showed a slide of income from SDCs and noted that staff recommends a small change on the commercial side for parks. It is currently based on a per employee basis which can be difficult to calculate as an upfront development fee. He explained the reason for a commercial parks fee is that employees may use the parks. Mr. LaFrance clarified that the non-residential part will be converted from per employee to per square foot,which is more easily known upfront. He said this does not change the amount collected, just the way it is collected. Mayor Cook noted that it doubles the non-residential amount collected. Council President Snider asked for the rationale on why it is doubling and asked if non-residents are using more parks more than before. Mr. LaFrance said non- residential represents only 15 percent of the total. !L1 Consultant Chase said the portion of non-residential park users is about the same as it was a few years ago but the most recent estimates from Metro are down slightly so there will be fewer employees to divide the commercial amount into. He said this is one reason to move away from the per employee basis to the square footage basis. Metro thinks the trend is towards more industrial types of businesses. Mayor Cook said since it is an SDC it is only applied to new construction. Council President Snider summarized by saying that because there are fewer new non-residential construction projects it drives up the amount that needs to be collected. Councilor Henderson asked what amount of money is achieved by this and what is the future population of River Terrace. Consultant Chase said they estimate 2500 units, for an increase of 6,500 residents and the amount raised is $57 million for the improvement portion for parks over 20 years. Councilor Henderson asked if inflation has been accounted for in the numbers and Consultant Chase said it is in 2015 dollars and will be indexed each year. Council President Snider said the non-residential methodology makes mathematical sense but it is a problem when considering how much employment land we have and other factors. He said if TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 4 of 13 Tigard is completely built out except for one non-residential building,we are saying we would take the entire amount and distribute it onto that one building. Mayor Cook added that it dis-incentivizes the type of development that we want to encourage. Consultant Chase said the methodology justifies the maximum Tigard could allocate to non-residential, but when the procedures manual is done and adopted by ordinance, council and staff can look again at growth in square feet for different developments and other factors including what Metro calls refill,which is an intensification (use) of existing buildings. Mr. LaFrance asked for any further direction on Parks SDCs and asked if there was consensus on the non-residential portion. Mayor Cook said he thought council was all in agreement on the reimbursement district but non-residential going up by 50 percent is a concern. He said he is worried about the effect on economic development. Mr. LaFrance said there are discounts built in. He asked if council wanted to keep proportional discounts or create a larger discount on non-residential, which is a small portion of total revenues. Mayor Cook said he liked where the numbers are and Councilor Henderson and Council President Snider agreed. Mayor Cook said the city could waive or reduce SDCs if there is an economic development issue that comes forward. In response to a question from Council President Snider on whether or not this would be a serious barrier to non- residential development, Consultant Chase said the city can take this up later and if it is an issue, decide not to charge a reimbursement fee for non-residential or consider other options. Mr. LaFrance asked for clarification on council's authority to waive or alter SDCs on a case by case basis. Consultant Chase said he would not recommend it on an ad hoc basis, because it gets into equity issues. It is better to have a policy about things such as a family—wage jobs, or quarter-mile to transit, etc. Mayor Cook said we have a development area the city is working on right now that may bring in 100 employees. Per employee that would be $81,000. Parks are a hard sell for businesses. Council President Snider agreed but said he likes the idea of incentivizing the provision of family- wage jobs, proximity to transit, and he would also add walkability. lam! Senior Transportation Project Engineer McCarthy showed slides on how the River Terrace SDC would pay for building River Terrace Boulevard. The standard practice with the county's transportation development tax (1'DT) is that the developer builds a street on that alignment or close to their subdivision. Typically,it would be a 32-foot from curb to curb local street with a 54- foot right of way. The developer would get credit for building anything larger than that. County- wide,building a five-lane street would put the cost of the 32-foot street on the developer but the extra lanes and wider sidewalks are creditable on the TDT. In the North Bethany area the county wanted to make sure certain essential roads were built so they offered a 100 percent credit for building some of their collector streets. There are also hybrid approaches. Mr. McCarthy asked council how it should be done in River Terrace. Standard practice would be that the developers build a 32-foot street with 54-foot right of way along the alignment. Then there would be credit for the extra pavement,center median, trail and wider landscaping. He discussed three options developed by staff. A—Standard county-wide practice B—Hybrid of A &C (75 percent credit) C — 100 percent credit TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 5 of 13 Giving 100 percent credit for all of River Terrace Boulevard would mean that the SDC would need to fund more infrastructure. This raises it to over$4,000. Council President Snider said either way they are paying the same amount. Engineer McCarthy described the impact on developers with a table top example of what various developers would pay based on the location of their project. ElCouncilor Goodhouse asked what happens if the costs to build a road are less than their SDC discount. Engineer McCarthy said we ask for receipts to administer credits. Consultant Chase said developers like B or C because the road costs are higher and the developer is limited to what they will get back but they will get actual cost for 100 percent of their costs. It gives them incentive to build the road and not worry so much about the costs. Mayor Cook said we want to incentivize so River Terrace Boulevard can be built first. He asked how the 75 percent figure in Option B was derived. Consultant Chase said it is consistent with the TDT methodology in that if a project is on the list, developers are can be eligible for 75 percent credits of the actual cost. Council President Snider asked if there is a way to balance and have perfect equity among the River Terrace developers. Engineer McCarthy said the theory is that a developer would have to build a local street on the same alignment. Some access requirements, such as street spacing or no driveways, etc., mean that some level of credit beyond the extra is reasonably fair. He did not think it would be as high as 75 percent. He estimated it would be in the 25-50 percent range. He said some extra credit for River Terrace Boulevard is merited but going to 75 or 100 is incentivizing to get this essential infrastructure built. Council President Snider asked if this actual number is attainable and if it was desirable to know what it is. Mr. LaFrance said it is possible to compute but that would be outside the scope of the project and there would be a cost for the consultant's time. Councilor Henderson said he is concerned that the grade of the property is not flat and in some cases they will be building in a ditch or on a hill. The 75 percent figure is not unreasonable in this scenario. He said in his experience as a contractor,building varies due to topography and it will not be equitable. Mr. LaFrance said he hears a general consensus that a hybrid between Options A and C is what council wants to explore. Councilor Woodard asked if a hybrid could be based on a perimeter. He said he wanted to keep a ceiling of$420 million over 20 years. Mr. LaFrance said the beauty of this credit policy is that the $420 million figure does not change. So if you give more credit to those building on River Terrace Boulevard, the city needs to collect more from those developers not building on River Terrace Boulevard. The River Terrace SDC rises as the credit policy rises. The lost revenue is made up by charging a higher fee. Council President Snider compared the SDCs if Option B is used and said it is a big deal as an SDC would go from $5,497 to $8,234 at a 75 percent credit. Councilor Goodhouse asked what could be done between Options A & B. Mayor Cook said there should be some incentivizing for River Terrace Boulevard or for building on that terrain, as Councilor Henderson mentioned. Mr. LaFrance said staff will bring a 50 percent option to the April hearing. Council Henderson and Mayor Cook were favorable towards a 50 percent credit option. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 6 of 13 Mayor Cook added that he is favorable towards selling credits as long as they have expiration dates. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said there were questions from council about where this places Tigard's costs compared to nearby cities. He showed a slide of a graph and said Tigard will be in the middle of areas in the same situation,based on council direction to go somewhere between A and B. Council President Snider asked why draft South Cooper Mountain rates are so different and noted they will be direct competitors for development. Consultant Chase said they have not yet tackled all the same problems Tigard is addressing and he would call theirs an interim SDC because they are not including a lot of the urban reserves. He added the North Bethany example does not include the service district charge which equates to another$2,500 dollars per dwelling, per year. Engineer McCarthy said staff has heard from other jurisdictions that their SDCs are coming up for review so there will be increases. Councilor Henderson asked if the estimates are based on a $300,000 home. Consultant Chase said they were an average based on a single family detached house and the trips generated. He said Councilor Henderson made a good point and some jurisdictions vary the SDC by house size or type (cottage home vs. estate home) and council could consider this. Councilor Henderson noted that sewer and water rates are predicated on how many bathrooms are built. Councilor Goodhouse said he would like to see more discussion on this as builders hear they should build more affordable homes but having to pay the same price doesn't make sense. Council gave Consultant Chase direction to explore this as an equity issue. ElCommunity Development Director Asher pointed out council's ability to shape what is going to happen in River Terrace. He hoped it is part of an ongoing discussion as "turning the dials up or down" is one way councils have some sway over what is incentivized and built. He noted an interest on council in having a place that is marketable and equitable. He said equitable does not mean equal;it means fair. Councilor Woodard asked what the market would bear in terms of Option A, B, or C. Council President Henderson said South Cooper Mountain and Bethany need to be considered. Consultant Chase said if the city is under 40, they are in the game. Community Development Director Asher said he did not see that Tigard is running off all the developers, and after a decision is made,it can be adjusted by council if that becomes the case. Councilor Goodhouse asked for staff to look at different home values. City Manager Wine said it is not tied to the value of the home,it is a charge based on the detached house. Consultant Chase said they can look at this before the next meeting and arrive at a suggestion for parks and transportation, broken into two categories: big homes and small homes. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance spoke about Transit Oriented Development. This is a mechanism to provide a discount for development that is built near transit, such as a WES station, for example. Consultant Chase said the funding methodology report identifies the amount that can be charged and collected through SDCs. The way it is collected is determined through a procedures manual, adopted by ordinance. A draft procedures manual will be ready in April. He said TOD will be covered in the manual so direction from council would be helpful. He said cities are starting to reduce SDCs for TOD, such as development within one-quarter to one-half mile of good bus or train service. Oregon City, Happy Valley and Vancouver,Washington are some of the cities doing this to provide incentives to build in their downtown areas. He said this would fit in the downtown Tigard area now and could be expanded to the Tigard Triangle or other areas. River TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 7 of 13 Terrace TOD would probably be more than five years out. The four options to providing SDC discounts for TOD include: 1. Status quo is for any development which can propose and give a traffic report. Based on that a determination can be made that their trips are fewer and their SDC could be less. 2. Requires statistical modeling;not recommended as it is more appropriate in bigger cities 3. Discount based on proximity of development to transit service areas. It could be one-half mile to a transit center or a frequent service bus stop. There is enough information available that the developer would not have to hire a traffic engineer to apply for this, so it is less expensive. 4. Can consider mix of development. Internal trip capture where people are living in mixed use and walking to go to the store. Can get a 15-40 percent discount. Council President asked if the council had to choose only one discount option. Consultant Chase said there could be a mix of these directions placed into the procedure manual. = Councilor Goodhouse said there is still the expense for the city to pay for light rail so the cost is being shifted from the road to the light rail. Consultant Chase said he did not think it was the case to add light rail costs to an SDC but it could be done if it is being built up in a downtown core and could also be the same for bike and pedestrian facilities. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said the city's 20 year list of projects has no TOD projects. Tigard is not proposing to build light rail or any transit with SDCs.This recognizes that the development would be near existing facilities or concrete pads for busses, etc. Mayor Cook clarified that this TOD is only for the transportation SDCs. Councilor Woodard said he likes the idea of discounts of building around certain transit models as it is sustainable. IICJ Councilor Henderson asked if the goal is to develop 20-minute Communities. Community Development Director Asher said Tigard does not have many 20-minute Communities but where it does,it is because they are built more densely and there are many modes of transportation available. This would be consistent with other city policies for downtown Tigard. It is a policy tool to use as an incentive for people to build in the downtown. Councilor Henderson asked if this was a city program and in response Mr. Asher said the only aspect is that building in the downtown would have a lower SDC because it would be TOD,based on the proximity to transit. Mayor Cook said he liked Option 4 because of the use of the projects. Senior Transportation Project Engineer McCarthy said a practical aspect of Option 4 is that it is a matrix of development types and incentives and gives developers solid numbers,making it easier to prepare their pro formas. It gives the city more freedom to promote smaller retail, mixed-use developments that create fewer trips. Councilor Goodhouse said people wanting to go downtown use roads and trails and if the city develops it right even more road use can be expected. Community Development Director Asher agreed and said, "Every successful place has a parking problem. More and more of the parking downtown should be for visitors. We cannot create more ground and building a parking structure is decades away." He said the city needs to be careful not to use all the parking for residents, and try TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 8 of 13 to attract people who do not want to rely on one or two cars. Councilor Goodhouse said people still want their cars and Tigard is not quite ready for all walking or biking as transportation. He said he did not think Tigard was the right area for these discounts yet. Council President Snider agreed and said he couldn't support 100 percent SDC discounts but does support some level of incentive to develop in transportation-rich areas. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance asked for consensus. Mayor Cook said he liked Option 4. Council President Snider prefers 3 or 4. Councilor Woodard was also favorable to Options 3 or 4. He said he is very much in favor of incentivizing transit oriented development and walkability. He said it would not hurt to have it in the code. Councilor Goodhouse suggested looking at it on a case by case basis. He asked, "What if developer trip estimates change? Can we go back and charge them?" If we go for these options, that would be better to do it on a case by case basis. Mr.LaFrance said he was not aware of a process for billing back. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said the process ahead includes a few public hearings, adoption of the methodology and then adoption of fees. 4. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON THE STREET MAINTENANCE FEE Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance, Public Works Director Rager and Streets and Transportation Project Engineer McCarthy presented this item. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said this is a continued discussion to receive more input and policy direction from council on street maintenance fees. Staff will need enough direction so they can calculate what the fee will be for adoption with the Master Fees and Charges Schedule in June. He asked what the desired Pavement Condition Index (PCI) should be. The general direction is 82 which can be achieved if the city works through the backlog of paving projects. I-Ie also asked about a proposal adding $1 million to the program which allows getting to the backlog over a ten-year period. Councilor Henderson said he cannot imagine reaching an 82 percent when considering that over the last five-six years we have had ARRA funds which helped us bring it up to 71, and now we are back to 69. The funds are also used for curb cuts,which took 25 percent of the fund. He said it is more realistic to hold the line. Engineer McCarthy said with the $1.9 million street maintenance fee for paving, the forecast says that is just enough that the PCI stays at 71 and the backlog remains 22 miles. He showed some maps and said the current plan is to spend the bulk of the money on the large neighborhood streets. He showed another map indicating what could be done next summer. In response to a question from Mayor Cook he said the extra streets are mostly backlog. Councilor Woodard said he was unsure that a PCI of 82 should be the goal. Mayor Cook said he always heard that 80 is sustainable and he is fine with that as a goal. Engineer McCarthy said 80-82 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 9 of 13 is within the range. He said the right-of-way maintenance was expanded to commercial areas and increased by $50,000. Council already agreed to do this. A discussion was held about curb cuts, an unfunded mandate required when paving a street. Mr. LaFrance said if SMF money is going to be used for this the code needs to be clarified. He asked council if they want to do anything to the fee to cover this expense. Options are the gas tax, streetlights and signals fund, or the general fund. Council President Snider suggested a curb cut utility fee. Engineer McCarthy proposed a code amendment to say that curb cuts are an allowed use of this fee,if required when paving. Councilor Goodhouse asked what would spur development to pay for curb ramps. Engineer McCarthy said the city replaces them at intersections and could do a separate program to cover them when streets are not being paved. He said making it a separate fund may increase the cost. ! I Councilor Henderson read from the code. He said 25 percent was used for curb ramps and asked if there was a residual amount left. Mr. LaFrance said that is no longer an issue because a reserve was built up so paving can start in the spring. He said the city has been able to gradually increase from a PCI of 68 to 71. Engineer McCarthy said streets are keeping in better shape than before, especially the slurry sealed streets. Councilor Henderson said we are looking at a $3 million budget that still has a requirement of 25 percent of this for curb work. Mayor Cook said it is not the entire $3 million project because some streets will not need them. Of$1.9 million in 2015, $300,000 or 16 percent,was used for curb ramps. Councilor Goodhouse would like to change the code to clarify that the street maintenance fee can be used for ramps. Mayor Cook and Councilors Woodard and Snider concurred. Councilor Henderson said he was OK as long as there is money in the fund. Mr. LaFrance asked if council wanted to increase the fund or say the curb cuts are now part of the program. Councilor Snider said as long as asphalt costs stay stable,we can do the curb cuts and hit the PCI of 80-82 with an additional$1 million. If we think what we have is stable, can do what we want to do and achieve the curb cuts,it is the right amount of money. Council President Snider suggested another discussion if the cost of asphalt rises and not waiting five years. Mayor Cook agreed and added that another discussion may be warranted if the city takes on Hall Boulevard, for example. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance asked about changing the percentages in the code that determine who will pay for maintenance on the street types. Right now it is one-third commercial and two-thirds paid by residential. The question is that the code says a local neighborhood collector street is paid 100 percent by residential. A commercial street or industrial street is paid by commercial and collectors and arterials have shares. Project Engineer McCarthy said currently collector streets are 50/50. Arterials are 62 percent non-residential and 38 percent residential. Councilor Henderson asked how many miles are covered by each. Mr. La France said staff could explore this if council decides to make changes. Council President Snider said the council's ultimate goal is to try to approximate what the usage is in a fair and equitable manner. The only way to capture revenue for usage by non-Tigard residents is by charging businesses that non-Tigard TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 10 of 13 residents drive to. He said Tigard's general approach is to have users pay for what they use,as in water billing. Councilor Woodard said he always thinks about the big box stores and suggested looking at parking spaces or footprint. He said weekend traffic is worse than weekday. He would prefer to look at a policy that considers the type of traffic. Drivers are coming from outside Tigard to shop here. Engineer McCarthy asked if he was hearing a concern that commercial is not paying enough. Councilors Woodard and Snider said that was their concern. Project Engineer McCarthy discussed the methodology. Councilor Goodhouse suggested that getting rid of the parking space cap might take care of the issue. Mr. LaFrance said the direction is hearing from council is for option 4. Staff will look for methodologies to figure out usages for collectors and arterials to see what effect that might have. He said council is interested in lifting the cap and asked if they want a new cap or to remove it completely. Currently,29 payers are capped. He asked what council wanted to do with the funds raised by lifting the cap. Councilor Henderson said the last time council considered removing the cap there was pushback from the grocers association. He said another issue is that increased costs to businesses are passed along to customers. He said he has always been concerned about how this is divided up and suggested only charging residents would cut back on paperwork immensely. He said too much is spent on servicing this program. Councilor Snider said residents are bearing the burden. It is not fair, considering that some businesses attract customers to Tigard and residents are paying for it. He said we have to be able to capture the revenue for people coming in and driving on our roads and this is the only way to do it. Councilor Goodhouse mentioned people coming to Tigard to go to Washington Square or the theaters. Council President Snider suggested eliminating the cap and keeping the $80,000 as a cushion. Councilor Woodard agreed. Councilor Goodhouse asked if removing the cap should be phased in. Mayor Cook said a lot of these are triple-net businesses and this will probably not be a deterrent. He noted that the grocers were the vocal group last time the cap discussion was held. Engineer McCarthy said the main Washington Square Mall would see an increase of$23,000 a year. For the larger grocery stores and big box stores the difference would be around $3,000 annually. Councilor Goodhouse was supportive of eliminating the cap. Engineer McCarthy recommended freezing the parking table used to make the street maintenance fee calculation so there is not an unintended consequence of changing the parking code which changes the street maintenance fee revenue. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said this will be discussed at a future meeting, most likely in May. Mayor Cook proposed calculating the amounts and making them public to let residents and businesses know and get their input before council decides anything. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 11 of 13 5. DISCUSSION ON POTENTIAL CHARTER REVIEW El Assistant City Manager Newton led a discussion on this item. She gave the history of past charter amendments,which must be voted on by the citizens. She noted that some sections are broadly written such as Section 20,which addresses the mayor's responsibility to appoint committees. She said there is actually a robust process that is not spelled out in the charter. Other sections are more specific. She said council has identified some potential charter changes and suggested they consider how specific they want things to be and what degree of latitude they want council to have. Council President Snider: • The requirement for any councilor running for mayor to resign is troubling. It is a disadvantage for two councilors due to the election schedule. • He said the current size of council is effective and efficient. • At large should be discussed. • The Willamette River Section should be discussed and the city attorney should clarify what it means to Tualatin Valley Water District. Councilor Goodhouse: • Council president term should change to one year. • Abolish or raise term limits. • Maintain "top two"vote getters; likes at large designation. Councilor Henderson had a handout of potential charter changes and what the ballot may look like. This has been added to the packet for this meeting. He suggested these could be on the same ballot. • Concerned about retaining knowledgeable people on council • Mayor and council term limits should change • Reconsider the number of councilors • Seat Representative (Should be a position, not the top two vote getters) Potential for geographic districts Mayor Cook: • Term limits are more appropriate at the federal level. At the local level,voting a candidate out is in effect, a term limit. • Any changes voted in by this council should not affect current office holders so changes aren't perceived as self-serving Councilor Woodard • Change council president every year • Eight year term limit for mayor,Twelve years for councilor • Prefers at large • Doesn't like the retain your seat part TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 12 of 13 Assistant City Manager Newton will collate this information and develop proposals for future council discussion. City Manager Wine asked if there were any other sources of input desired. Council President Snider suggested taking these ideas to the city's boards and committees. Assistant City Manager Newton suggested a discussion with the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task Force. 6. NON AGENDA ITEMS City Manager Wine said 1 x 5 x 10 meetings are scheduled at the end of March and early April. Topics are sidewalks, SW Corridor and Recreation. Councilor Henderson said he wants to discuss marijuana regulations. Staff will provide council with talking points and comment cards to gather feedback. Maps will be made available for marijuana regulation and SW Corridor topics. Council President Snider noted that open-ended sections on the comment cards are not helpful. City Manager Wine noted changes on the April council meeting calendar. There will be no CCDA meeting on April 7. There is a combination CCDA/Council Business meeting on April 14 and a combination Council Business/Workshop meeting on April 21. Council President Snider reminded everyone he will be absent from the March 24 meeting. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. 8. ADJOURNMENT At 10:03 p.m. Council President Snider moved for adjournment. Councilor Goodhouse seconded the motion and all voted in favor. Yes No Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Carol A. Krager, City Recorder Attest: John L. Cook, Mayor Date TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 17, 2015 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 13 of 13 AIS-2217 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Proclaim National Public Works Week Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Proclamation Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Should Mayor Cook proclaim May 17-23, 2015 as National Public Works Week? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST N/A KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY This annual celebration is led by the American Public Works Association (APWA). This year's theme is "Community Begins Here" and honors the impact that public works activities have on communities nationwide. The APWA writes, "There would be no community without the quality of life public works provides. There would be no community to police and protect, no public to lead or represent. Public works allows the world as we know it to be. This year's theme "Community Begins Here" speaks to the essential nature of Public Works services in support of everyday quality of life." OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not issue the proclamation. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments National Public Works Week Proclamation ... p +w A`rw , 'rte r' . 6- S 01 - ., I .• 0 4., City of Tigard ' ':�� National Public Works Week '.c May 17-23, 2015 4,f t. WHEREAS,the City of Tigard's Public Works Department proudly provides .111 stewardship over the city's water, sewer, storm drainage, streets,fleet,facilities and , ''#k,' ,�.. park systems; and .- .r' WHEREAS,the reliability,quality and effectiveness of these systems is of vital t' importance to the health, safety,viability and well-being of our community; and t WHEREAS, public works professionals plan,design,operate and maintain the ,; water, sewer, storm drainage,streets,fleet,facilities and park systems and services essential to serve our citizens; and �`' ', WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders and children to *' = •„� understand the important role that public works plays in nearly every aspect of their _ everyday lives. , r • NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I,John L. Cook, Mayor of the City of jt i:.,V . • Tigard,Oregon,do hereby proclaim the week of May 17-23,2015 as • V., r 3 t NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK x ice.! in Tigard,Oregon and urge all residents to join in recognizing the important role public .4 ` works plays in serving our community. � y Dated this day of 2015. f ! IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the *-1 `•.t City of Tigard to be affixed. • ' John L. Cook, Mayor ` �J., City of Tigard !,.. :h- Attest: 4A,� ' ..,e,,,:,,,,7:,,,v. j City Recorder '< • y y,y i r� I ,,T. ,, t'A'.. -.)-- , A, t,i ' A . t, 1 A li A . ,/ . ■ 1;/,,,in resC hee ie-t) Z) �� he Q/,5'" PLACE HOLDER FOR ' AG1- NIDAITKMNO. 5 Award 'VI Were Mayor, I Would. . . " contest winners. AIS-2236 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Resolution of Appreciation For Tigard High School Envoy Carter Kruse Submitted By: Carol Krager,City Management Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting Resolution -Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall council approve a resolution acknowledging and commending Carter Kruse for his service as Tigard High School Envoy to the City of Tigard? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Motion to approve resolution. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Associated Student Body President Carter Kruse has performed as the Tigard High School Student Envoy to the Tigard City Council by attending Council meetings and reporting on school activities and milestones. As a Tigard High School student,Carter displayed an enormous amount of initiative and planning to build a team of peers to successfully restore the city's Youth Advisory Council to active and thriving status. Carter's sincere interest in and dedication to learning how city government contributes to the community and seeing how a well-run municipality supports county, state and national governmental functions earned him coveted spot in the United States Senate Youth Program and an accompanying scholarship from The Hearst Foundation. At the end of the school year Council traditionally presents the envoy with a resolution recognizing their accomplishments as liaison to the Tigard City Council. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION May 27, 2014 Attachments RESOLUTION CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING AND COMMENDING CARTER KRUSE FOR HIS SERVICE AS THE TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT ENVOY TO THE CITY OF TIGARD WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council desires to connect with students in schools to improve communications and relationships;and WHEREAS, City of Tigard elected and appointed officials appreciated the monthly student activity updates from Tigard High School Envoy Carter Kruse;and WHEREAS,the activities coordinated by Tigard High Associated Student Body President Carter Kruse and his fellow student leaders benefitted students and the Tigard community;and WHEREAS,Carter Kruse helped reestablish the Tigard Youth Advisory Council and was elected to be its president. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City of Tigard Council and staff members hereby convey their gratitude to Carter Kruse for his exemplary service as Tigard High School Student Envoy to the City of Tigard. SECTION 2: The City of Tigard Council and staff members hereby extend congratulations and wishes for future health and success to Carter Kruse. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2015. Mayor-City of Tigard AT I EST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 15- Page 1 -,ems k>> / e � ch Ckt led. AIS-2198 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Informational Public Hearing: FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Prepared For: Toby LaFrance Submitted By: Carissa Collins,Financial and Information Services Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing-Legislative Business Meeting- Main Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication 04/15/2015 Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE A third quarter supplemental to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget is being requested to account for revenues and expenses that were unknown at the time of budget adoption. The following issues are addressed in the amendment including budget adjustments in City Operations for Police and Public Works. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve the FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Budget Amendment. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY CITY OPERATIONS Police Department 1) Grant Recognitions-A request is being made to recognize the following grant revenues and expenditures totaling$21,550: •Oregon Dept. of Transportation/Oregon Impactin the amount of$11,250 to be used for payment of unbudgeted overtime related to DUII enforcement missions. •Dept. of Justice for$5,800 that will reimburse the city for 50% of the cost of bullet proof vests. •Oregon Liquor Control Commissionin the amount of$4,500 for reimbursement of overtime for decoy missions at$3,770 as well as for Student Resource Officer training at$730. 2) Radio Purchases -Police is in the process of replacing 155 radios that will meet upgraded security standards mandated by the regional 911 dispatch centers in Portland and Washington County.A request for additional appropriation totaling$50,000 is needed to purchase 10 additional P25 portable compliant radios. This action will leave 108 radios in inventory that require replacement by January 2018. 3) Advanced License Plate Recognition (ALPR) -The city has purchased two Advanced License Plate Recognition (ALPR) systems which include 4 cameras.The cameras have been installed on two patrol cars. Per the agreement with Washington Square,at least one vehicle will drive through the Washington Square property every day to review license plates for stolen cars,outstanding warrants, etc. Washington Square agreed to reimburse the city 50% for one system.A request to recognize the reimbursement totaling$10,900 is being made for this system. Public Works Department 4) Engineering Reorganization -A request for additional appropriation is required to pay for the voluntary separation of one employee resulting from the reorganization of the Engineering Division. A total of$30,000 is needed to pay for the voluntary separation incentive program for$25,000 along with $5,000 to cover 2 months of salary and benefits for hiring a Sr. Project Engineer. 5) Public Works Yard Building Relocation -The PW Yard at Ash St.is being demolished for development. Current staff are being relocated to other sites.As part of this move,a total of$50,000 is being requested to build a fabrication shop with a restroom at Ash Avenue and Burnham Street that will replace the one that is being removed. 6) Community Garden Trust -An additional appropriation in the amount of$3,000 is being requested to purchase a permit for the removal of a tree in the community garden. 7) Lighter, Quicker, Cheaper (LQC) Program-A total of$200,000 of one time expenditures has been approved for Lighter, Quicker, Cheaper projects in General Fund contingency.A total of$30,000 has already been spent on two other projects. This action will move another$95,000 to operating budgets leaving$75,000 for the remainder of the program. The following streets have been selected for the program: Spruce St. Sidewalk-A request for$20,000 of additional appropriation is needed to construct 100 feet of sidewalk in conjunction with an adjacent private development on Spruce between 78th and 80th Avenues. Atlanta/Haines Sidewalk-A request for$20,000 of additional appropriation is needed to fill in a 200 foot gap in a sidewalk on Atlanta Street(also known as Haines Street) from 68th Avenue to the I-5 overpass. McDonald St. Crosswalk-A request totaling$20,000 of additional appropriation is needed to enhance an existing crosswalk with street lighting and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) to help pedestrians crossing McDonald Street. Tigard Street Trail Paving-A request totaling$35,000 of additional appropriation is needed to pave the Tigard Street Trail. This is an interim step to make the trail functional until a full plan for the trail can be determined and funded. The General Fund Contingency will be transferred to the Gas Tax Fund. The Tigard Streets Division will do the work. The $35,000 is for the materials and equipment lease to conduct the paving. Non Budgetary Impact Item- Capital Improvement Program - A total of$250,000 of budget is being moved from water CIP projects 96034, 96028,and 96024 to pay for the installation of pipe casing and waterline for 96036: Pacific Hwy/Gaarde St. Utility Casing Bore Crossing project(See Exhibit B). OTHER ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Supplemental. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be Strategic Plan: Become the Most Walkable Community in the Pacific Northwest where People of All Ages Enjoy Healthy and Interconnected Lives DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: 225,450 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department/program):PD/PW Additional Fiscal Notes: The total impact of this supplemental will increase the FY 2015 Adopted Budget by$170,450. Although the supplemental consists of increased requirements, they are entirely offset by additional resources. These resources include revenues of$170,450 and contingency of$175,000. Exhibits A and B contain the details of each budgetary item to the impacted fund(s). Exhibit C summarizes the items by fund for all city funds. Attachments Resolution Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FY 2015 TO ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING: RECOGNITION OF GRANT REVENUES AND EXPENSES, ALONG WITH BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS IN PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES. WHEREAS,the city is acknowledging those items that were unknown at the time the FY 2015 Budget was adopted; and WHEREAS, the city recognizes $345,450 of unanticipated requirements in operations, capital, and transfers; and WHEREAS, the city acknowledges that the increase in unanticipated requirements is offset by additional resources of$170,450 and contingency of$175,000. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The FY 2014-15 Budget is hereby amended as detailed in Exhibit A. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2015. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 15- Page 1 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 1.Grant Recognitions-Police A request is being made to recognize the following grant revenues and expenditures: a).Oregon Dept.of Transportation/Oregon Impact-grant proceeds of$11,250 to be used for payment of unbudgeted overtime related to DUII enforcement missions. b).Dept.of Justice-A grant totaling$5,800 that reimburses the city with 50%of the cost for bullet proof vests. c).Oregon Liquor Control Commission-A grant in amount of$4,500 from OLCC for reimbursement of overtime for decoy missions at$3,770 as well as Student Resource Officer training for$730. This action will increase governmental revenues by$21,550 with an equal increase in Police program expenditures. Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $10,192,493 $10,192,493 Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815 Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632 Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 S 1,177,412 Intergovernmental $ 5,693,651 $ 21,550 S 5,715,201 Charges for Services S 2,694,034 S 2,694,034 Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232 Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous S 70,873 $ 70,873 Other Financing Sources S 265,5011 $ 265,500 Transfers In ■in(tthcr'kinds S Total Resources $40,395,364 $ 21,550 $40,416,914 Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 $ 3,232,095 Community Services $ 21,682,611 $ 21,550 $ 21,704,161 Policy&Administration S 854,155 S 854,155 Public Works S 5,881,563 S 5,881,563 Program Expenditures Total $31,650,424 $ 21,550 $31,671,974 Debt Service $ - S - Loans $ 254,0011 S 254,000 Work-In-Progress S - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 888,892 $ 888,892 Contingency S 905,777 S 905,777 Total Budget $33,699,093 $ 21,550 $33,720,643 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271 Total Requirements $40,395,364 $ 21,550 $40,416,914 Page 1 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 2.Radio Purchases-Police \request for additional appropriation in the amount of$50,000 is being requested to purchase 10 additional P25 portable compliant radios.The dty has purchased 47 radios in its effort to replace 155 radios by January 2018.This action will increase fines and forfeiture revenues by$50,000 with an equal increase in Community Service program expenditures. Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Criminal Forfeiture Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 182,978 $ 182,978 Property Taxes $ - S - Franchise Fees $ - S - Licenses&Permits $ - S - Intergovernmental - Charges for Services $ - S - Fines&Forfeitures $ 43,000 $ 50,000 S 93,000 Interest Earnings S 1,892 S 1,892 Miscellaneous S - S - Other Financing Sources S - S - Transfers In from Other Funds limmitimit Total Resources $ 227,870 $ 50,000 $ 277,870 Requirements Community Development S - S Community Services S 50,000 $ 50,000 S I i a i,I Policy&Administration S - S Public Works S - S - Program Expenditures Total $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 Debt Service S S - Loans $ S - Work-In-Progress $ - S - Transfers to Other Funds S 455 S 455 Contingency - Total Budget $ 50,455 $ 50,000 $ 100,455 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 177,415 $ - $ 177,415 Total Requirements $ 227,870 $ 50,000 S 277,870 Page 2 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 3.Advanced License Plate Recognition(ALPR)-Police The city has purchased two Advanced License Plate Recognition(ALPR)systems which include 4 cameras.The cameras have been installed on two patrol cars.Per the agreement with Washington Square,at lease one vehicle will drive through the Washington Square property every day to review license plates for stolen cars,outstanding warrants,etc. Washington Square agreed to reimburse the city 50%for one system.A request to recognize the reimbursement totaling $10,900 is being made for this system.This action will show an increase in intergovernmental revenues by$10,900 with an equal increase in Community Services program expenditures. Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $10,192,493 $10,192,493 Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815 Franchise Fees S 5,799,632 S 5,799,632 Licenses&Permits S 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412 Intergovernmental $ 5,693,651 $ 10,900 $ 5,704,551 Charges for Services $ 2,694,034 $ 2,694,034 Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232 Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous $ 70,873 $ 70,873 Other Financing Sources $ 265,500 S 265,500 Tr,u�sfcrs In from Other Iunds S - S - Total Resources $40,395,364 $ 10,900 $40,406,264 Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 $ 3,232,095 Community Services S 21,682,611 $ 10,900 $ 21,693,511 Policy&Administration S 854,155 S 854,155 Public Works S 5,881,563 $ 5,881,563 Program Expenditures Total $31,650,424 $ 10,900 $31,661,324 Debt Service $ - $ - Loans $ - S - Work-In-Progress $ 254,000 $ 254,000 Transfers to Other Funds S 888,892 $ 888,892 Contingency S 905,777 S 903,777 Total Budget $33,699,093 $ 10,900 $33,709,993 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271 Total Requirements $40,395,364 $ 10,900 $40,406,264 Page 3 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 4.Division Reorganization-Public Works Engineering A request for additional appropriation is required to pay for the voluntary separation of one employee resulting from the reorganization of the Engineering Division. A total of$30,000 is needed to pay for the voluntary separation incentive program for$25,000 along with$5,000 to cover 2 months of salary and benefits for hiring a Sr.Project Engineer. This action will result in a decrease in General Fund contingency by$30,000 with an equal increase in Public Works program expenditures. Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $10,192,493 $10,192,493 Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815 Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632 Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412 Intergovernmental $ 5,693,651 $ 5,693,651 Charges for Services S 2,694,034 $ 2,694,034 Fines&Forfeitures S 993,232 $ 993,232 Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous S 70,873 $ 70,873 Other Financing Sources S 265,500 $ 265,500 Transfers In from Other Funds S - $ - Total Resources $40,395,364 $ - $40,395,364 Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 $ 3,232,095 Community Services S 21,682,611 $ 21,682,611 Policy&Administration S 854,155 $ 854,155 Public Works S 5,881,563 S 30,000 $ 5,911,563 Program Expenditures Total $31,650,424 $ 30,000 $31,680,424 Debt Service - Loans - Work-In-Progress S 254,000 $ 254,000 Transfers to Other Funds S 888,892 S 888,892 Contingency S 905,777 S (30,000) S 875,777 Total Budget $33,699,093 $ - $33,699,093 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271 Total Requirements $40,395,364 $ - $40,395,364 Page 4 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 5.Public Works Yard Guiding Relocation-Public Works The PW Yard at Ash St.is being demolished for development.Current staff are being relocated to other sites. As part of this move,a total of$50,000 is being requested to build a fabrication shop with a restroom at Ash Avenue and Burnham Street that will replace the one that is being removed. This will result in a decrease of contingency of$12,500 in each fund of Sanitary Sewer,Stormwater,Water,and General Fund.Transfers will increase and capital program expenditures in General Capital Facilities Fund will increase by$50,000. Fund 1 of 5 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Sanitary Sewer Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 4,618,778 $ 4,618,778 Property Taxes - Franchise Fees - Licenses&Permits $ 587,133 $ 587,133 Intergovernmental - Charges for Services $ 1,584,277 $ 1,584,277 Fines&Forfeitures - Interest Earnings $ 100,333 $ 100,333 Miscellaneous $ 141,674 $ 141,674 Other Financing Sources $ - $ - Transfers In from Other Funds S 1,369,900 S 1,369,900 Total Resources $ 8,402,095 $ - $ 8,402,095 Requirements Policy and Administration - - Community Development - S - Community Services - S - Public Works 1,974,545 S 1,974,545 Program Expenditures Total $ 1,974,545 $ - $ 1,974,545 Debt Service - Loans $ - $ - Work-In-Progress $ 2,996,061 $ 2,996,061 Transfers to Other Funds $ 106,759 $ 12,500 $ 119,259 Contingency S 344,805 S (12,500) S 332,305 Total Budget $ 5,422,170 $ - $ 5,422,170 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 2,979,925 $ - $ 2,979,925 Total Requirements $ 8,402,095 $ - $ 8,402,095 Page 5 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 5.Public Works Yard Buiding Relocation-Public Works The PW Yard at Ash St.is being demolished for development.Current staff are being relocated to other sites. As part of this move,a total of$50,000 is being requested to build a fabrication shop with a restroom at Ash Avenue and Burnham Street that will replace the one that is being removed. This will result in a decrease of contingency of$12,500 in each fund of Sanitary Sewer,Stormwater,Water,and General Fund.Transfers will increase and capital program expenditures in General Capital Facilities Fund will increase by S50,000. Fund 2 of 5 Q1 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Stormwater Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 3,795,745 $ - $ 3,795,745 Property Taxes S - S - Franchise Fees S - S - Licenses&Permits S - $ - Intergovernmental - $ - Charges for Services S 3,034,291 S 3,034,291 Fines&Forfeitures - S - Interest Earnings $ 7,936 $ 7,936 Miscellaneous $ 3,069 S 3,069 Other Financing Sources S S - Transfers In from Other Funds S - S - ,_ Total Resources $ 6,841,041 $ - $ 6,841,041 Requirements Policy and Administration $ - S Community Development - $ - Community Services - S - Public Works S 1,634,362 S 1,634,362 Program Expenditures Total $ 1,634,362 $ $ 1,634,362 Debt Service S - S - Loans S - $ - Work-In-Progress $ 345,373 $ 345,373 Transfers to Other Funds S 350,956 S 12,500 S 363,456 Contingency S 90,050 $ (12,500) S 77,550 Total Budget $ 2,420,741 $ - $ 2,420,741 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 4,420,300 $ - $ 4,420,300 Total Re.uirements $ 6,841,041 $ - $ 6,841,041 Page 6 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 5.Public Works Yard Buiding Relocation-Public Works The PW Yard at Ash St.is being demolished for development.Current staff are being relocated to other sites. As part of this move,a total of$50,000 is being requested to build a fabrication shop with a restroom at Ash Avenue and Burnham Street that will replace the one that is being removed. This will result in a decrease of contingency of S12,500 in each fund of Sanitary Sewer,Stormwater,Water,and General Fund.Transfers will increase and capital program expenditures in General Capital Facilities Fund will increase by$50,000. Fund 3 of 5 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Water Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 16,125,957 $ - $ 16,125,957 Property Taxes S $ - Franchise Fees $ - $ - Licenses&Permits $ 14,400 $ 14,400 intergovernmental 5 - S - Charges for Services $ 16,708,280 S 16,708,280 Fines&Forfeitures S - S - Interest Earnings S 30,644 5 30,644 Miscellaneous $ 10,825 $ 10,825 Other Financing Sources - S - Transfers In from Other Funds S 58,751 $ 58,751 Total Reso-►Rr ,.$44944,1817 $ Requirements Community Development S - S - Community Sen-ices S - S - Policy and Administration - $ - Public Works $ 8,376,282 S 8,376,282 Program Expenditures Total $ 8,376,282 $ - $ 8,376,282 Debt Service $ - S - Loans - S - Work-In-Progress $ - S - Transfers to Other Funds S 5,814,667 S 12,500 $ 5,827,167 Contingency S 452,410 $ (12,500) $ 439,910 Total Budget $ 14,643,359 $ - $ 14,643,359 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 18,305,498 $ - $ 18,305,498 Total Requirements $32,948,857 $ - $32,948,857 Page 7 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 5.Public Works Yard Buiding Relocation-Public Works The PW Yard at Ash St.is being demolished for development.Current staff are being relocated to other sites. As part of this move,a total of$50,000 is being requested to build a fabrication shop with a restroom at Ash Avenue and Burnham Street that will replace the one that is being removed. This will result in a decrease of contingency of$12,500 in each fund of Sanitary Sewer,Stormwater,Water,and General Fund.Transfers will increase and capital program expenditures in General Capital Facilities Fund will increase by$50,000. Fund 4 of 5 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Bu_d get General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493 Property Taxes S 13,404,815 S 13,404,815 Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ 5,799,632 Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ 1,177,412 Intergovernmental $ 5,693,651 $ 5,693,651 Charges for Services $ 2,694,034 $ 2,694,034 Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232 Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous S 70,873 $ 70,873 Other Financing Sources S 265,500 $ 265,500 Transfers In Irian Oilier Funds S - S - _ Total Resources $40,395,364 $ _ $__40„0,5_464 Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 $ 3,232,095 Community Services $ 21,682,611 $ 21,682,611 Policy&Administration $ 854,155 S 854,155 Public Works S 5,881,563 S 5,881,563 Program Expenditures Total $ 31,650,424 $ - $ 31,650,424 Debt Service - Loans $ - $ - Work-ln-Progress $ 254,000 $ 254,000 Transfers to Other Funds $ 888,892 $ 12,500 S 901,392 Cumingencv $ 905,777 $ (12,500) S 893,277 Total Budget $33,699,093 $ - $33,699,093 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271 Total Requirements $40,395,364 $ - $ 40,395,364 Page 8 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 5.Public Works Yard Buiding Relocation Public Works The PW Yard at Ash St.is being demolished for development.Current staff arc being relocated to other sites. As part of this move,a total of$50,000 is being requested to build a fabrication shop with a restroom at Ash Avenue and Burnham Street that will replace the one that is being removed. This will result in a decrease of contingency of$12,500 in each fund of Sanitary Sewer,Stormwater,Water,and General Fund.Transfers will increase and capital program expenditures in General Capital Facilities Fund will increase by$50,000. Fund 5 of 5 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Gen'l Capital Facilities Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 878,435 $ 878,435 Property Taxes $ - $ - Franchise Fees $ - $ - Licenses&Permits $ - $ - Intergovernmental $ - $ - Charges for Services $ - $ - Fines&Forfeitures S - S - Interest Earnings $ 3,212 $ 3,212 Miscellaneous $ - $ - Other Financing Sources ` - $ - Transfers In from Other Funds 1,031,891 S 50,000 S 1,081,891 MMILTotal Resources $ 1,913,538 $ 50,000 $ 1,963,538 Requirements Policy and Administration Community Development Community Services S Public Works S Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Debt Service $ - $ - Loans $ - $ - Work-In-Progress $ 974,900 $ 50,000 $ 1,024,900 Transfers to Other Funds $ 8,742 $ 8,742 Contingency $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Total Budget $ 1,033,642 $ 50,000 $ 1,083,642 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 879,896 $ - $ 879,896 Total Requirements $ 1,913,538 $ 50,000 $ 1,963,538 Page 9 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 6.Community Garden Trust-Public Works An additional appropriation in the amount of$3,000 is being requested to purchase a permit for the removal of a tree in the community garden.This action results in an increase in Charges for Services revenues by$3,000 with an equal increase in Public Works program expenditures. Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493 Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 $ 13,404,815 Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 S 5,799,632 Licenses&Permits S 1,177,412 S 1,177,412 Intergovernmental $ 5,693,651 S 5,693,651 Charges for Services $ 2,694,034 $ 3,000 S 2,697,034 Fines&Forfeitures S 993,232 $ 993,232 Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous $ 70,873 $ 70,873 Other Financing Sources $ 265,500 $ 265,500 Transfers In from Other Funds S - S - Total Resources $40,395,364 $ 3 000 $40 398,364 Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 S 3,232,095 Community Services $ 21,682,611 $ 21,682,611 Policy&Administration $ 854,155 S 854,155 Public Works S 5,881,563 S 3,000 S 5,884,563 Program Expenditures Total $ 31,650,424 $ 3,000 $ 31,653,424 Debt Service - Loans $ - S - Work-In-Progress $ 254,000 S 254,000 Transfers to Other Funds S 888,892 S 888,892 Contingency S 905,777 S 905,777 Total Budget $33,699,093 $ 3,000 $ 33,702,093 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271 Total Requirements $40,395,364 $ 3,000 $40,398,364 Page 10 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 7.Lighter,Quicker,Cheaper Program A total of$95,000 is being requested for construction of the following sidewalks: ,Spruce St.Sidewalk construction of 100 feet of sidewalk between 78th and 80th Avenues for$20,000 Atlanta/Haines Sidewalk construction to fill a 200 foot sidewalk gap for$20,000 McDonald St.Crn vs%enhancement with street lighting and beacons for S20,000 Tigard St.Trail to construct an asphalt path from Tigard St.to Main St.by Symposium Coffee for$35,000 The result of this action will decrease General Fund contingency by$95,000.Transfers will increase by$35,000 in the Gas Tax Fund.In turn,Public Works program expenditures will increase by$60,000 in the General Fund and by$35,000 in the Gas Tax Fund. Fund 1 of 2 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ 10,192,493 Property Taxes $ 13,404,815 S 13,404,815 Franchise Fees S 5,799,632 S 5,799,632 licenses&Permits S 1,177,412 S 1,177,412 Intergovernmental $ 5,693,651 $ 5,693,651 Charges for Services S 2,694,034 $ 2,694,034 Fines&Forfeitures $ 993,232 $ 993,232 Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous S 70,873 $ 70,873 Other Financing Sources S 265,500 S 265,500 Transfers In from Other Funds S S - Total Resources $ 40,395,364 $ $ 40,395,364_ Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 5 3,232,095 Community Services $ 21,682,611 5 21,682,611 Policy&Administration S 854,155 $ 854,155 Public Works S 5,881,563 S 60,000 S 5,941,563 Program Expenditures Total $ 31,650,424 $ 60,000 $ 31,710,424 Debt Service - S - Loans - S - Work-In-Progress $ 254,000 $ 254,000 Transfers to Other Funds S 888,892 $ 35,000 S 923,892 Contingeny S 905,777 5 (95,000) S 810,777 Total Budget $33,699,093 $ - $33,699,093 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271 Total Requirements $ 40,395,364 $ - $ 40,395,364 Page 11 of 12 FY 2015 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibit A 7.Lighter,Quicker,Cheaper Program A total of$95,000 is being requested for construction of the following sidewalks: Spruce St.Sidewalk construction of 100 feet of sidewalk between 78th and 80th Avenues for$20,000 Atlanta/Haines Sidewalk construction to fill a 200 foot sidewalk gap for$20,000 McDonald St.Crosswalk enhancement with street lighting and beacons for$20,000 Tigard St.Trail to construct an asphalt path from Tigard St.to Main St.by Symposium Coffee for$35,000 The result of this action will decrease General Fund contingency by$95,000.Transfers will increase by$35,000 in the Gas Tax Fund.In turn,Public Works program expenditures will increase by$60,000 in the General Fund and by$35,000 in the Gas Tax Fund. Fund 2 of Z Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Gas Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 571,900 $ - $ 571,900 Property Taxes - Franchise Fees $ - S - Licenses&Permits $ 225 $ 225 Intergovernmental $ 2,990,443 S 2,990,443 Charges for Services $ - $ - Fines&Forfeitures $ - $ - Interest Earnings S 55,732 S 55,732 Miscellaneous S 61,345 S 61,345 Other Financing Sources S - S - Transfers In from Other Funds S 100,000 S 35,000 S 135,000 IL Total Resources $ 3,779,645 $ 35,000 $ 3,814,645 Requirements Community Development - Community Services S - S - Policy&:\dministration S - S - Public Works $ 2,205,002 $ 35,000 $ 2,240,002 Program Expenditures Total $ 2,205,002 $ 35,000 $ 2,240,002 Debt Service $ 599,676 $ 599,676 Loans - Work-ln-Progress $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 907,023 $ 907,023 Contingence S 57,610 $ 57,610 Total Budget $ 3,769,311 $ 35,000 $ 3,804,311 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 10,334 $ - $ 10,334 Total Re uirements $ 3,779,645 $ 35,000 $ 3,814,645 Page 12 of 12 Exhibit B 96036:Pacific Highway/Gaarde Street Utility Casing Bore Crossing The project will install casing pipe and waterline to cross Pacific I lighway near the intersection of Pacific I lighwav/Gaarde Street/McDonald Street.To take advantage of the economy of scale,it is proposed that this casing he installed as part of the construction at the intersection.Funds for this project is moved from 96034,96028,and 96024.No budgetary impact to reserves. Life to FY 2014 Audited Original New Budget Actuals Budget 2015 This change 2015 2016 Project Total Internal Expenses Project Management - 11,000 - 11,000 - 11,000 Design and I?ngineering - 75,000 - 75,000 - 75,000 Construction - 200,000 250,000 450,000 - 450,000 Total - 286,000 250,000 536,000 - 536,000 External Expenses Design and I ngineering - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - Total - - - - - - Total Project Expense - 286,000 250,000 536,000 536,000 Revenue Funding Source Water Fund - 143,000 150,000 293,000 - 293,000 Water(:IP Fund - 143,000 100,000 243,000 - 243,000 Total Project Revenues - 286,000 250,000 536,000 - 536,000 96034:New Water Source Systemwide Improvements Program Funding transferred to 96036:Pacific I Iwy/Gaarde St.Utility Casing Bore Crossing project. Life to FY 2014 Audited Original New Budget Actuals Budget 2015 This change 2015 2016 Project Total Internal Expenses Project Management - 15,000 - 15,000 - 15,000 Construction Management - 15,000 - 15,000 - 15,000 Total - 30,000 - 30,000 - 30,000 External Expenses Public Involvement 20,000 - 20,000 - 20,000 Design and Engineering - 25,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 Construction - 215,000 (100,000) 115,000 - 115,000 Total - 260,000 (100,000) 160,000 - 160,000 Total Project Expense - 290,000 (100,000) 190,000 - 190,000 Revenue Funding Source Water CI Fund - 290,000 (100,000) 190,000 _ - 190,000 Total Project Revenues 290,000 (100,000) 190,000 - 190,000 Exhibit B 96028:Fire Hydrant Replacement Program Funding transferred to 96036: Pacific I lwy/Caarde St. Utility Casing Bore Crossing project. Life to FY 2014 Audited Original New Budget Actuals Budget 2015 This change 2015 2016 Project Total Internal Expenses Project\lanagemcnt - - - - - - Total - - - - - - External Expenses Construction - 170,000 (100,000) 70,000 - 70,000 Total - 170,000 (100,000) 70,000 - 70,000 Total Project Expense - 170,000 (100,000) 70,000 - 70,000 Revenue Funding Source \\ater Fund - 170,000 (100,000) 70,000 - 70,000 Total Project Revenues - 170,000 (100,000) 70,000 - 70,000 96024:Water Line Replacement Program Funding transferred to 96036:Pacific I INS-/(;aarde St.Utility Casing Bore Crossing project. Life to FY 2014 Audited Original New Budget Actuals Budget 2015 This change 2015 2016 Project Total Internal Expenses Project Management - 8,000 - 8,000 - 8,000 Construction Management - 5,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 Total - 13,000 - 13,000 - 13,000 External Expenses Public Involvement - 5,000 (5,000) - - - Designi and I.ngineering - 25,000 (25,000) - - - Construction - 100,000 (20,000) 80,000 - 80,000 Total - 130,000 (50,000) 80,000 - 80,000 Total Project Expense - 143,000 (50,000) 93,000 - 93,000 Revenue Funding Source Water Fund - 143,000 (50,000) 93,000 - 93,000 Total Project Revenues - 143,000 (50,000) 93,000 - 93,000 FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Affected City Funds Resources Beginning Fund Balance $36,366,286 $ - $36,366,286 Property Taxes $ 13,976,715 S - $ 13,976,715 Franchise Fees S 5,799,632 $ - S 5,799,632 Special Assessments S - $ - $ - Licenses&Permits $ 1,779,170 $ - $ 1,779,170 Intergovernmental 5 8,684,094 $ 32,450 $ 8,716,544 Charges for Services S 24,020,882 $ 3,000 $ 24,023,882 Fines&Forfeitures S 1,036,232 $ 50,000 $ 1,086,232 Interest Earnings $ 303,471 $ - $ 303,471 Miscellaneous $ 287,786 S - $ 287,786 Other Financing Sources S 265,500 S - $ 265,500 Transfers In from Other Funds S 2,560,542 S 85,000 S 2,645,542 Total Resources $95,080,310 $ 170,450 $95,250,760 Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 $ - $ 3,232,095 Community Services $ 21,732,611 $ 82,450 $ 21,815,061 Policy&Administration $ 854,155 $ - $ 854,155 Public Works S 20,071,754 S 128,000 $ 20,199,754 Program Expenditures Total $45,890,615 $ 210,450 $ 46,101,065 Debt Service S 599,676 S - $ 599,676 Loans $ 254,000 S - $ 254,000 Work-In-Progress S 4,316,334 S 50,000 S 4,366,334 Transfers to Other Funds S 8,077,494 S 85,000 $ 8,162,494 Contingency S 1,900,652 S (175,000) $ 1,725,652 Total Budget $ 61,038,771 $ 170,450 $ 61,209,221 Reserve For Future Expenditure $34,041,539 $ - $34,041,539 Total Requirements $95,080,310 $ 170,450 $95,250,760 1 of 8 FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:2 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Criminal Forfeiture Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 182,978 $ - $ 182,978 Property Taxes $ - S - $ - Franchise Fees $ - S - S - Licenses&Permits $ - S - $ - Intergovernmental S - $ - S - Charges for Services S - $ - S - Fines&Forfeitures S 43,000 $ 50,000 S 93,000 Interest Earnings S 1,892 $ - S 1,892 Miscellaneous $ - $ - S - Other Financing Sources S - S - - Transfers In from Other Funds S - s - S - Total Resources $ 227,870 $ 50,000 $ 277,870 Requirements Community Development S - S - $ - Community Services S 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 Policy and Administration $ - $ - $ - Public Works S - $ - $ - Program Expenditures Total $ 50,000 $ 50,000 _$ 100,000 Debt Service $ - S - S - Loans S - S - S - Work-In-Progress S - S - S - Transfers to Other Funds $ 455 $ - S 455 Contingency $ - S - S - Total Budget $ 50,455 $ 50,000 $ 100,455 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 177,415 $ - $ 177,415 Total Re.uirements $ 227,870 $ 50,000 $ 277,870 2 of 8 FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items: 1,3-7 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 10,192,493 $ - $ 10,192,493 Property Taxes S 13,404,815 S - S 13,404,815 Franchise Fees $ 5,799,632 $ - $ 5,799,632 Special Assessments $ - $ - $ - Licenses&Permits $ 1,177,412 $ - $ 1,177,412 Intergovernmental S 5,693,651 $ 32,450 S 5,726,101 Charges for Services S 2,694,034 $ 3,000 S 2,697,034 Fines&Forfeitures S 993,232 $ - S 993,232 Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ - S 103,722 Miscellaneous S 70,873 $ - S 70,873 Other Financing Sources S 265,500 S - S 265,500 Transfers In from Other Funds S - - Total Resources $ 40,395,364 $ 35,450 S 40,430,814 Requirements Community Development $ 3,232,095 $ - $ 3,232,095 Community Services $ 21,682,611 $ 32,450 $ 21,715,061 Policy&Administration $ 854,155 S - S 854,155 Public Works S 5,881,563 S 93,000 S 5,974,563 Program Expenditures Total $ 31,650,424 $ 125,450 $ 31,775,874 Debt Service S - $ - S - Loans S 254,000 S - S 254,000 Work-In-Progress S - S - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 888,892 $ 47,500 5 936,392 Contingency S 905,777 S (137,500) S 768,277 Total Budget $ 33,699,093 $ 35,450 $ 33,734,543 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,696,271 $ - $ 6,696,271 Total Re I uirements $ 40,395,364 $ 35,450 $ 40,430,814 3 of 8 FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:7 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Gas Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 571,900 $ - $ 571,900 Property Taxes S - S - $ Franchise Fees S - $ - $ - Licenses&Permits S 225 $ - S 225 Intergovernmental S 2,990,443 S - S 2,990,443 Charges for Services S - $ - S - Fines&Forfeitures S - $ - S - Interest Earnings S 55,732 S - S 55,732 Miscellaneous S 61,345 S - S 61,345 Other Financing Sources S - S - S - Transfers In from Other Funds S 100,000 S 35,000 S 135,000 ° Total Resources $ 3,779,645 $ 35,000 $ 3,814,645 Requirements Community Development S - S - $ - Community Services S - $ - $ - Policy&Administration S - $ - $ - Public Works S 2,205,002 S 35,000 S 2,240,00' Program Expenditures Total $ 2,205,002 $ 35,000 $ 2,240,002 Debt Service S 599,676 $ - S 599,676 Loans $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress S - $ - S - Transfers to Other Funds $ 907,023 S - $ 907,023 Contingency S 57,610 S - S 57,610 Total Budget $ 3,769,311 $ 35,000 $ 3,804,311 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 10,334 $ - $ 10,334 Total Requirements $ 3,779,645 $ 35,000 $ 3,814,645 4 of 8 FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:5 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Sanitary Sewer Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 4,618,778 $ - $ 4,618,778 Property Taxes S - $ - $ - Franchise Fees $ - $ - $ - Licenses&Permits S 587,133 S - S 587,133 Intergovernmental $ - $ - S - ChargesforServices S 1,584,277 S - $ 1,584,277 Fines&Forfeitures S - S - S - Interest Earnings S 100,333 S - 5 100,333 Miscellaneous S 141,674 S - $ 141,674 Other Financing Sources S - S - S - Transfers In from Other Funds S 1,369,900 5 - 1,369,900 Total Resources $ 8,402,095 $ - $ 8,402,095 Requirements Policy and Administration $ - $ - S - Community Development S - S - $ - Community Services S - S - S - Public Works S 1,974,545 S - S 1,974,545 Program Expenditures Total $ 1,974,545 $ - $ 1,974,545 Debt Service S - S - S - Loans $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress $ 2,996,061 S - S 2,996,061 Transfers to Other Funds S 106,759 S 12,500 $ 119,259 Contingency S 344,805 S (12,500) S 332,305 Total Budget $ 5,422,170 $ - $ 5,422,170 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 2,979,925 $ - $ 2,979,925 Total Requirements $ 8,402,095 $ - $ 8,402,095 5 of 8 FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:5 Q1 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Stormwater Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 3,795,745 $ - $ 3,795,745 Property Taxes $ - S - $ - Franchise Fees $ - S - $ - Licenses&Permits $ - S - S - Intergovernmental $ - $ - S - Charges for Services S 3,034,291 $ - $ 3,034,291 Fines&Forfeitures $ - $ - $ - Interest Earnings 5 7,936 $ - $ 7,936 Miscellaneous $ 3,069 S - S 3,069 Other Financing Sources S - S - S - Transfers In from Other Funds s - S - s - Total Resources $ 6,841,041 $ - $ 6,841,041 Requirements Policy and Administration S - S - $ - Community Development $ - $ - $ - Community Services $ - $ - $ - Public Works S 1,634,362 S - $ 1,634,362 Program Expenditures Total $ 1,634,362 $ - $ 10.41362_ Debt Service S - S - S - Loans $ - $ - S - Work-In-Progress S 345,373 $ - 5 345,373 Transfers to Other Funds S 350,956 $ 12,500 S 363,456 Contingency S 90,050 S (12,500) S 77,550 Total Budget $ 2,420,741 $ - $ 2,420,741 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 4,420,300 $ - $ 4,420,300 Total Re uirements $ 6,841,041 $ - $ 6,841,041 6 of 8 FY 2015 Third Quarter Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:5 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget Water Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 16,125,957 $ - $ 16,125,957 Property Taxes S - S - S - Franchise Fees $ - $ - S - Licenses&Permits $ 14,400 $ - S 14,400 Intergovernmental S - $ - S - Charges for Services S 16,708,280 S - S 16,708,280 Fines&Forfeitures S - $ - S - Interest Earnings S 30,644 $ - $ 30,644 Miscellaneous S 10,825 $ - S 10,825 Other Financing Sources S - S - S - Transfers In from Other Funds S 58,751 S S 58,751 Total Resources $ 32,948,857 $ - $ 32,948,857 Requirements Community Development S - $ - S - Community Services $ - $ - S - Policy and Administration $ - $ - S - Public Works $ 8,376,282 $ - S 8,376,282 Program Expenditures Total $ 8,376,282 $ - $ 8,376,282 Debt Service $ - $ - S - Loans $ - $ - S - Work-In-Progress S - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 5,814,667 $ 12,500 $ 5,827,167 Contingency S 452,410 $ (12,500) S 439,910 Total Budget $ 14,643,359 $ - $ 14,643,359 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 18,305,498 $ - $ 18,305,498 Total Requirements $ 32,948,857 $ - $ 32,948,857 7 of 8 FY 2015 Third Quartet Supplemental Exhibit-C Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:5 Q2 Q3 Revised Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Capital Facilities Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 878,435 $ - $ 878,435 Property Taxes $ - S - S - Franchise Fees S - S - S - Licenses&Permits S - S - S - Intergovernmental S - S - S - Charges for Services $ - S - S - Fines&Forfeitures S - S - $ - Interest Earnings S 3,212 $ - S 3,212 Miscellaneous S - $ - $ - Other Financing Sources S - S - S - '1'ransfers In from Other I mid S 1,031,891 S 50,000 S 1,081,891 Total Resources $ 1,913,538 $ 50,000 $ 1,963,538 Requirements Community Development S - - Community Services $ - S Polity and Administration S - S S Public Works S - S s - Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $, - Debt Service S - $ - S - Loans S - $ - S - Work-In-Progress $ 974,900 $ 50,000 $ 1,024,900 'Transfers to Other Funds $ 8,742 $ - $ 8,742 Contingency S 50,000 S - S 50,000 Total Budget $ 1,033,642 $ 50,000 $ 1,083,642 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 879,896 $ - $ 879,896 Total Re uirements $ 1,913,538 $ 50,000 $ 1,963,538 8 of 8 AIS-2214 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes): 50 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Briefing on YMCA - City of Tigard Feasibility Study Results Prepared For: Marty Wine,City Management Submitted By: Norma Alley,City Management Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Council will receive a briefing on the YMCA and City of Tigard survey by Christin Baker of Daxko Consulting,Bob Hall, CEO of YMCA of the Columbia-Willamette and Marty Wine,City Manager. Discussion of next steps following the survey is scheduled for additional review on May 19 at the Council workshop. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Council is asked to receive the survey results and discuss them,including potential next steps,at the Council workshop on May 19 and later. No action is requested at this meeting. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In the past, city staff and a City Councilor have separately initiated contact with the YMCA to learn more about their services in February 2012, and again in November 2014 to explore the potential for a future partnership for providing services in the Tigard area. The City Council has recently heard testimony during citizen communication from members of the community,including community organizer Neal Brown, that a petition was being circulated to build a recreation center in Tigard and to partner with the YMCA for its operation. One thousand people reportedly signed a petition indicating community support for a YMCA. The proposal was specific as to the location of the facility in downtown Tigard and the specific program and facility offerings that would be provided the proposed building. Based on the community support that was indicated to the City Council in November, 2014, the City and the YMCA agreed to share the cost for a survey to assess the demand for the services of the YMCA in Tigard. The City committed $12,000 toward$25,000 in survey costs to determine the level of demand for the YMCA's services, together with the YMCA and contributed funding from Washington County. In February, 2015,representatives of the YMCA,Neal Brown, several other city residents,and three members of city staff met together to determine the survey questions. This group included YMCA CEO Bob Hall;Tigard residents Neal Brown,Scott Brown,Carter Kruse, Reid Iford;city staff Brian Rager,Nadine Robinson,Steve Martin; and Christin Baker (Daxko Consulting). The survey instrument outlining the feasibility study questions is attached. The City of Tigard has been examining the role that City government should play in providing recreation programming and services (e.g., classes,events,sports,recreation information).The Tigard City Council has sought the improvement of recreation services in Tigard as an adopted Council goal since 2012.At the same time the joint survey with the YMCA was beginning,the City of Tigard was completing a year-long study of what the city's role should be in recreation programming,a study which included a community survey to assess the preferred level of investment. The survey included identifying community programming priorities, and discussing potential sustainable levels of investment in future recreation services. The study found that the first investment in recreation programming should be established in the 2015-16 budget,including continuing the recreation program guide;establishing grants and scholarships and a staff position devoted to recreation coordination; and beginning in years 2 and 3,the city should begin to offer programs and classes and events at existing city facilities. The City Council adopted these first steps from the recreation study as their 18-month goals for 2015-16. The final report and recommendations of the city recreation study and survey are attached. The study found that residents might be willing to realistically pay for recreation in the range of$20-$60 per year per household. That survey also showed very high support for partnerships,but lower support for a community center (39%), with 60% strongly or somewhat opposing it at$100/year per household. The YMCA-Tigard feasibility study was fielded between March 1 and March 31 by Daxko Consulting,who specializes in surveys for non-profits. Both the City and the YMCA were identified as sponsoring the survey. Registered voters were surveyed,including both land-based and cell phone lines. In addition to testing the program offerings and pricing structure offered by the YMCA,the survey questions referenced two possible locations,and also asked those surveyed about their willingness to pay additional property taxes for a voter-approved bond that would fund the land and facility. The survey looked at the demographics and market profile of Tigard. Findings included a high level of exercise frequency in the Tigard community,with the highest demand for programs and facilities a swimming pool, cardiovascular equipment and weights and classes,with those living at home reporting that their children would be interested in using a YMCA. Of two general locations identified in the survey to test for convenience of potential locations,76% found a downtown location to be convenient or very convenient,and 61% found a location near 99W/Bull Mountain to be convenient or very convenient. When asked about willingness to pay a property tax increase of"about$10 per month" to build a center,41.9% said they would support, 19.1%would oppose, 15.9%were not sure, and 23.1% said they needed more information. The survey sought to identify the demand for membership types and tested the price level and membership forecast for a potential new facility. Daxko Consulting will present the final feasibility study results, conclusions and recommendations at this meeting. The final report of the feasibility study findings is attached. With the completion of the survey,Tigard has asked the YMCA to pause so that both parties can jointly consider what the survey may indicate for next steps. This could include where a community center fits within city priorities at this time; determining capital and operating costs that might be indicated in Tigard for a potential center; or a potential facility size that may be feasible. Other analysis for the city that is of interest to the decision making process should include considering all steps needed to take a facility bond measure for voter consideration in context of other city priorities for funding and facilities;how a future partnership with a recreational operator might be structured in terms of an agreement;the time and planning needed for site and facility planning,design and construction. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council is asked to receive the survey results and discuss them at the Council workshop on May 19 and later. No action is requested at this meeting. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS Provide Recreation Opportunities for the People of Tigard: Explore feasibility of partnership opportunties, including Tualatin Hills Park&Recreation District,YCA and other city or nonprofit opportunities;establish facility partnership if feasible. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION City Council agreed to contribute funding to the survey in November,2014. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: As next steps have not yet been identified, the fiscal impact of proceeding with any partnership for recreation partnership is not yet known. Attachments City Recreation Final Report YMCA-Tigard Feasibility Study Y-COT Survey Qs --. _:,, y d t, .�l 7r' {,ed ��duntiot ieu r s •e:a wd Lf, m• the _t. N .atopp are most ne tga - t, �Ynerfincho' j - n;.S n Y 44Uitio , / • nl 44e am. . - _ -.. ... \\A__ / / :-irvA, ' t Tort .1' 1,1!' ff r rig ,‘ F - �4 Ilit CITY OF TIGARD r• Recreation Program Study: Recommendations and Implementation Plan 0 FINAL I MARCH 2015 M ■ G I — INI No z TIGARD t.: Tigard Recreation Program Study Recommendations & Implementation Plan March 2015 Prepared by: III IS MIG, Inc. 815 SW 2nd Avenue,Suite 200 Portland,Oregon 97204 503.297.1005 www.migcom.com Tigard Recreation Program Study Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 Purpose of the Study 1 Purpose of the Document 1 Summary of the Process 1 Community Involvement 2 Community Recreation Goals 3 Long-Term Goal. 3 Short-Term Goal. 4 Recommended Programming Solution 5 Overview of Short-term Service Option 5 Resource Needs 8 Policies and Organizational Needs 9 Implementation Plan Timeline 12 Estimated Implementation Costs 15 Proposed Funding Approach 17 Appendices Appendix A: Community Outreach Findings Appendix B: Recreation Options Matrix Appendix C: Recreation Program Survey Appendix D: Model Job Description: Recreation Coordinator Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page i Tigard Recreation Program Study Acknowledgements City Council John L. Cook, Mayor Marland Henderson, Council President Gretchen Buehner,Councilor Jason Snider, Councilor Marc Woodard, Councilor Park and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) Troy Mears, Chairperson Dave Brown Claudia Ciobanu Wayne Gross Holly Polivka Linda Shaw Scott Winkels Barry Albertson (TTSD Liaison) J. Randall Brenner(alternate) Tim Pepper(alternate) City Manager Marty Wine Staff Team Molly Carlisle, Library Readers Services Division Manager Jim de Sully, Assistant Police Chief Steve Martin, Public Works Division Manager Troy Mears, PRAB Representative Liz Newton,Assistant City Manager Brian Rager, Interim Public Works Director Debbie Smith-Wagar,Assistant Finance Director Marc Woodard, City Council Representative Consulting Team MIG, Inc. EMC Research The Community of Tigard The key to the development of this document was the involvement of Tigard's active, passionate and well- informed citizenry.The planning team would like to thank the many individuals and groups that provided input throughout this process. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page ii Tigard Recreation Program Study Executive Summary The question of how to facilitate and fund organized recreation programming in the City of Tigard has surfaced several times over the last 15 years. In 2000, a measure to create a park district in Tigard, Tualatin, Sherwood and portions of unincorporated Washington County was voted on but did not pass.The 2009 Park System Master Plan included recommendations for the City to help facilitate and provide space for programs in the community, but funding for the necessary staff person was not approved. In 2014,the City initiated a Recreation Program Study to consider the role that City of Tigard should play in providing recreation programming and services (e.g., classes,events,sports, recreation information).This included identifying community programming priorities and discussing potential sustainable levels of investment in future recreation services. As part of that study,this Recommendations and Implementation Plan defines both short and long-term community goals to enhance recreation programming based on community priorities. It identifies the necessary resources, estimated costs and an implementation strategy to initiate the highest priority recreation options over a five-year pilot period. Community Priorities and Goals A variety of outreach methods were applied during the planning process to ensure that all recommendations were based on community priorities, as well as residents'willingness to pay for enhanced recreation services. Stakeholder interviews,focus group and advisory committee meetings, and an online questionnaire were conducted to identify community recreation needs,goals and desired service levels for recreation programs and events.This feedback was used to identify three programming options— different potential"packages" of recreation services that were tested with residents in a random-sample ' Recreation Programs Survey to gauge their " ,'-i e ."1 I . ,rr'i'` �+�� :-/if' .. f support.These finding were presented to ' �` i 0 ` i It !�"!N"'.1t,`I x both the Park and Recreation Advisory Board '1 , t and City Council to identify long-term and 1 ' 1 1, 4 i l 4)ft , short-term goals, as well as a recommended "1111111111k . '#, programming solution for the community. 'r a.0 a The entire process was carried out with the . may �� .. .*4140. f guidance of Tigard's professional staff, volunteer advisory board members and I ..;,,;; likt- elected officials.Approximately 950 people i�� .• " -- participated in this planning process. This community-driven process identified the following short-and long-term goals for recreation programming in Tigard: Short-Term Goal: Establish a pilot recreation program to test viability and build support for expanded services. Long-Term Goal:Support a comprehensive public recreation program with a hub of activity,augmented with programs spread across the community. This document presents the recommendations and implementation plan to achieve the community's short- term recreation goals for the future. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page iii Tigard Recreation Program Study Recommendations Program recommendations reflect the community's desire to have the City begin immediately in enhancing recreation information, programs and events for all residents, but especially for underserved groups. It is based on the efficient and best use of existing parks and facilities to enhance recreation options for the community.This involves building on current recreation initiatives undertaken by the City and maximizing opportunities provided by existing recreation providers. The document identifies resource needs to carry out the following recommendations: • Recreation Clearinghouse& Program Guide: s' , ' . � Create a bi-annual recreation guide that provides "° '® — information about the many different recreation ic' a options available in the City. 1k. .4ytt • Grants&Scholarships: Expand the City's existing -A, /41 fund and process for awarding grants to support successful recreation programs and events _r•--�"'" • 144 provided by non-profits and community groups in Tigard. Initiate a scholarship fund to support access of low-income residents to existing recreation programs. • Programs&Classes: Contract with recreation providers to schedule and facilitate programs in existing City parks and facilities. In time, consider expanding program offerings to potential partner facilities. • Outdoor Events: Recruit event providers to increase community events at existing City parks and facilities and provide programs at the new downtown plaza planned for construction. Manage event coordination,scheduling, monitoring, as well as event facility maintenance. • Indoor Events: Recruit event providers to increase community events at indoor City facilities. Manage event coordination,scheduling, monitoring, as well as event facility maintenance. • Facility Reservations: Improve the online facility reservation system (which includes staff reservations for facility use)to be able to offer City facilities for reserved use by community groups and residents. In time, consider training staff to host events as a strategy for revenue generation. • Drop-In Activities: Provide drop-in recreation activities at PRIMIria. " • different locations throughout the community to improve ,;4; recreation access for residents. Coordinate, staff, equip and host these activities, and focus on serving targeted - i • underserved groups and areas. " • •r " E Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page iv Tigard Recreation Program Study Implementation Plan The City should strive to implement short-term recommendations over the next five years. It will take five years to gradually ramp up tasks to the level of service now desired by the community.Table 1 (beginning on page 13) illustrates tasks to set in motion during Years 1-5, indicating what resources will be needed each year for implementation. In short, implementation is based on the following phasing strategy,with each year adding new elements to enhance programming options: • Year 1: Begin initial coordination, policy development and mow information, and recreation guide development; increase *pow grants and initiate scholarship awards. • Year 2: Provide pilot programs and outdoor events. • Year 3: Increase grants; increase programs and outdoor events; establish pilot programs for indoor events. • Year 4: Initiate facility reservations and pilot programs for drop-in activities; increase in indoor events. • Year 5: Increase drop-in activities. It is anticipated that Years 1-5 will coincide with the City's budgeting cycle and are considered to be fiscal years (July—June). During this time,the City may also continue to test community support for implementing longer-term goals. If support for a community center increases,the City may investigate partner support to develop a multi-purpose recreation center. Efforts to pursue longer-term goals should not preclude the advances in implementing short-term recommendations. Proposed Funding Approach Based on responses noted in the voter survey conducted in November 2014,there appears to be sufficient support for a recreation funding measure in the near future.While it will take time to get a funding measure introduced and approved,City staff and Council should consider the approval of City funds initiate Year 1 recommendations to show progress toward City Council's goal of establishing a recreation program in FY 2015-16. This action will help make the strongest possible case for voters to continue to support recreation programming through an added funding mechanism. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page v Tigard Recreation Program Study Introduction Purpose of the Study The City of Tigard is examining the role that City government should play in providing recreation programming and services(e.g., classes,events, sports, recreation information).This includes identifying community programming priorities and discussing potential sustainable levels of investment in future recreation services. Service enhancements may be needed to expand community recreation options and activate City facilities to maximize public benefit and use. As the City of Tigard has grown into the 12th largest city in Oregon, it has become one of the largest without a public recreation program. City residents value parks and recreation.The community passed a $17 million bond to acquire and develop new parks and natural areas in 2010 while still deep in the great recession. While bond projects will enhance recreation opportunities,these funds do not specifically support recreation programs or events. Over the last 15 years,the question of how to facilitate and fund organized recreation programming has resurfaced many times. In 2000,Tigard, along with Tualatin, Sherwood and portions of unincorporated Washington County,voted on a measure to create the Atfalati Recreation District. While it had a lot of support (with 46% in favor),the measure failed. In the aftermath of this vote, a strong demand continued in Tigard for recreation programs and services. However,funding was never identified. In 2009, when the City of Tigard updated the Park System Master Plan, recommendations included the City playing a limited role in organizing and providing space for programs in the community. A proposal to fund the necessary staff position made it as far as the budget committee, but it did not succeed due to competing interests. Subsequent efforts to develop the crowd-sourced Recreation Resource Guide reflected the City's desire to make the most of the existing public and private providers. However,the demand for services remains unmet, prompting this Recreation Program Study to facilitate a decision-making process to settle the question of Tigard's future role in recreation programming. Purpose of the Document As the final step in the Recreation Program Study, this document summarizes recommendations and implementation strategies to enhance recreation programming and services. It defines both short and long- term community goals for recreation programming. It recommends a programming solution to achieve short-term goals by implementing a package of programming elements. It identifies the necessary resources and estimated costs to carry out recommendations, and presents these strategies, resource needs and costs on an implementation timeline that plots the development of the program over a five-year pilot period. Finally,the document recommends a funding strategy to set this implementation plan in motion. Summary of the Process Begun in Spring 2014,the Recreation Program Study was organized in three phases (Figure 1). In Phase 1: Inventory& Program Analysis,the program inventory was updated,funding resources were evaluated and community outreach was started to identify community demands and needs for recreation services,as well as their willingness to support some type of taxing measure. Results were summarized in a market, demand and gap analysis presented to the Project Team. Staff and community feedback was used to identify recreation options to advance. During Phase 2: Scenario Development,these recreation options were Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 1 Tigard Recreation Program Study refined into three different service level packages. Community support for these packages was tested in a random-sample phone survey. Initial findings were presented to the Project Team as well as the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. During Phase 3: Decisions and Implementation,the City sought Council guidance on the types and scale of recreation services that could be affordable and supported. This guidance from City Council help frame the recommendations and implementation strategies presented in this document.The Project Team will review and refine findings before creating a final plan for enhancing City recreation services. Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Inventory& ♦ Scenario .♦ Decisions& Program Analysis Development lmplementeitlon Figure 1:Recreation Program Study Planning Phases Community Involvement Public feedback was critical to the Recreation Program Study. The planning process engaged City leaders, stakeholders, interest groups and residents in identifying community recreation needs and interests, evaluating feedback to identify the community's recreation goals,and cross-checking the desired level of service with residents in a statistically valid survey.The entire process was carried out with the guidance of Tigard's professional staff,volunteer advisory board members and elected officials. Specific engagement tasks are noted below. Findings and interim materials are presented in Appendices A through C of this document. • Stakeholder Interviews: Interviews ranging from 20-45 minutes in length were conducted by phone and in person to address ten questions related to the provision of recreation programs in Tigard. Interviewees were encouraged to share their insights and views regarding the realities and opportunities to provide or facilitate programming. Stakeholders included the City Manager, members of City Council, recreation providers, affordable housing advocates and development groups. • Recreation Questionnaire:An online questionnaire was available for 7'A weeks,from June 11th until August 15t, 2014. The purpose was to collect feedback on recreation participation, satisfaction,and desired programming.The questionnaire link was advertised in the local newspaper, on the City's website, and in an email distributed to a few thousand residents via the City's mailing list. In addition, stakeholders reached out to their organizations to distribute the questionnaire.A total of 604 people responded to the questionnaire,with 354 people answering every question and another 250 partially completing the questions. • Focus Groups:The City held a focus group comprised of 16 community members on August 26th, 2014, from 5-6:15pm at the Tigard Public Works Auditorium.The meeting included one large focus group discussion and two small focus group discussions.The large focus group discussed community recreation priorities, providing answers to four prompts.The two small groups discussed recreation options for the future, with three topics to guide them. Feedback from the focus group was used to refine the recreation matrix in Appendix B. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 2 Tigard Recreation Program Study • Recreation Program Survey:A live telephone survey or registered voters in the City of Tigard was conducted October 2-8, 2014 by EMC Research. A total of 300 interviews were conducted to gather input on the ratings of City services and programs, identify problems, identify opportunities, and rank funding options, among other subjects.The results of this survey are summarized in Appendix C. • Recreation Study Project Team:The Project Team served as a technical advisory committee composed of staff from various City Departments along with City leaders.The team met three times over the course of the project to review progress and provide guidance on deliverables and key decisions.They reviewed survey findings and identified important characteristics of the recommended programming options. In addition to the outreach discussed above,City Council and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board provided guidance at critical points in the planning process. Community Recreation Goals This community-driven exploration resulted in identification of a short-term and a long-term goal for recreation programming in Tigard. Ultimately,these goals were expressed by the Park and Recreation Advisory Board in their recommendation to the City Council at the joint work session on November 18, 2014.This two-part recommendation reflects the tension throughout this process around how far the City should go in facilitating programming options. It is important to emphasize that while there was some discussion to determine"how much should we do?" there was an almost universal sense that the City should proceed now with preliminary steps to initiate recreation services. Long-Term Goal: Supporting a comprehensive public recreation program with a hub of activity, augmented with programs spread across the community. The driving desire expressed by the community is for improved recreation services for all Tigard residents. Generally those residents with the means to do so have found the recreation services they need in the private sector or with public agencies beyond Tigard city limits. However many residents are unable or unwilling to spend limited resources or travel to meet their recreation needs.The creation of a truly public system of recreation opportunities would benefit all residents by supporting a more cohesive community, improved health and enhanced livability. A comprehensive program would include a wide variety of program areas, expanding from the community provided sports leagues and private fitness centers to a broader mix of classes, outdoor recreation and community events.The program would also include all of the necessary supporting services such as marketing,volunteer coordination, and facilities management.To provide these programs and services, new multi-purpose recreation facilities would be needed to expand on the classroom, meeting spaces and outdoor park facilities already in the City inventory. Providing both a hub and a series of distributed recreation opportunities (at local parks, neighborhood schools and other locations) reduces the barriers to accessing these activities, particularly for the youth and elderly in the community. Providing this kind of comprehensive service will require a substantial investment by the community in both capital and ongoing operational funding, particularly since this is an almost entirely new business for the Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 3 Tigard Recreation Program Study City of Tigard.This investment does not need to be made all at once, and in most communities is built up over an extended period of time. Short-Term Goal: Establishing a pilot recreation program to test viability and build support for expanded services. In the short-term,the community's goal is to immediately enhance recreation opportunities and begin building a substantial platform from which to grow toward the comprehensive program.This includes providing more information in a recreation guide regarding available recreation classes and activities in the area (both public and private providers).The existing classes and opportunities, properly promoted,will make the quickest, highest quality impact on the perception of recreation options in Tigard. As the catalog of programs is grown,the City will begin to expand recreation opportunities for all residents, but more specifically targeting underserved groups and areas, particularly residents who face financial and transportation limitations.This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, but will require new and expanded partnerships,scholarship and grants to involve existing recreation providers in ensuring that targeted needs are met. For these expanded partnerships and existing providers to reach a broader audience,the City must utilize all potential indoor and outdoor spaces for recreation programs and classes. City parks are a clear opportunity, but improving indoor recreation access and scheduling for community meeting rooms needs to be reestablished.The City also has a prime opportunity to combine an expansion of programs with the realization of an existing pledge to the community for a downtown event plaza. Included in the 2010 parks bond,the events plaza will be a place to hold community gatherings and focus activity around the re- emergent downtown. However,simply building the plaza will not accomplish this goal.The City will need to facilitate and program the kinds of activities that make a downtown plaza a positive addition to the community. One of the most important features of the City's short-term recreation goal is that it must be financially viable for the City to initiate and to continue. Recreation programming is not currently a part of the services provided by the City of Tigard, and an initial community investment will be needed to create the staff capacity to build this seed program. This short-term goal, more clearly defined in the next section, is built from the ideas and preferences expressed by Tigard residents, park and recreation users and key stakeholders.These ideas were filtered through the statistically valid phone survey effort to draw out the most important issues and alternatives to Tigard voters. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 4 Tigard Recreation Program Study Recommended Programming Solution The initial public outreach conducted for this planning process helped define community expectations and goals for recreation programs,events and services.These were refined into three programming packages, which were tested with residents in a random-sample Recreation Programs Survey, and then refined through discussions with the Park and Recreation Advisory Board and City Council into both long-term and short-term goals, as well as a recommended programming solution. Below is an overview of the recommended short-term service option.This document identifies the resources needed to implement these recommendations, as well as anticipated costs and a proposed timeline to initiate services over the next five years. It concludes with a proposed funding and implementation approach to bring new services online. Overview of Short-term Service Option The recommended option reflects the community's interest in moving forward immediately on low-cost options to improve recreation information and add programs, classes, and events for underserved groups. This involves building on current recreation initiatives undertaken by the City and maximizing opportunities provided by existing recreation providers. The recommended programming solution has seven program areas,which are described below. • Recreation Clearinghouse&Program Guide:The City currently provides an online Recreation Resource Guide, a list of recreation opportunities and providers in the broader region. However, residents need a coordinated recreation guide that notes activities, costs, schedules and registration information for programs and classes in Tigard.The guide could be produced and printed as well as posted online twice a year(Spring/Summer and Fall/Winter)to increase community access to and knowledge of existing recreation opportunities.The City would serve as an information clearinghouse for residents, creating a process to collect information from public, private and non-profit providers operating in Tigard,and advertising activities and programs for providers for a fee. For costs savings,the printed version would be available at key community facilities (e.g., library,City Hall, public pools), and distributed through service groups and schools to targeted populations who may not have access to an online version (Note:The Recreation Guide is not intended to be mailed to every household in the city, nor provided to every child attending school.). Notifications of the guide's availability should be included in the Cityscape newsletter, utility bills,school information, and via flyers that can be posted at parks,service centers, medical facilities,coffee shops and other businesses throughout the community. • City Grants&Scholarships:The City of Tigard supports community events and social services through grants to community groups and agencies(by application).The current City guideline for appropriations is one-half of 1%of the prior year's operating budget. However,competition for these funds has increased, and more funds are awarded for social services than community events.To maximize the recreation opportunities provided by proven agencies and non-profits, increasing grant funding (including funding to cover in-kind staff support)for recreation and events is an effective way to reach targeted groups. In addition,the City should create a scholarship fund with awards by application to cover class fees and/or transportation costs for participants who cannot afford the current"pay to play" market costs. For both the scholarships and grant awards,criteria should be developed for award selection and distribution,to ensure that funds support underserved groups (low income residents, seniors) and targeted recreation opportunities (e.g., health &fitness,environmental education, nature- based outdoor recreation,and non-sports interest classes and fine/cultural arts programs). Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 5 Tigard Recreation Program Study • Programs&Classes:To expand recreation programs,the City should serve as a recreation coordinator, recruiting and contracting with existing providers to offer recreation classes and programs in appropriate City parks and facilities.This model could extend the programs offered by private providers and non-profits into new locations and facilities,which may be more accessible to residents who are not currently served. It also would strive to increase programming options by starting new contract programs and activities in the following service areas: o Health &fitness o Environmental education/nature-based outdoor recreation/trails o Non-sports interest classes and fine/cultural arts programs Existing Tigard Library programs, current and past Police Department youth initiatives, and partnership opportunities with other existing groups should be taken into consideration in determining the right mix of programs to support. Contract providers would pay the City a reservation fee for the use of the park/facility, set based on a set policy regarding cost recovery(see Policies and Organizational Needs).The contract provider would handle registration and fee collection, provide all necessary equipment,and keep all proceeds (less the registration fee). With this model,the City subsidizes added recreation programming, but does not incur the risk of being a program provider.An example of this type of programming is bringing in an art instructor to teach ongoing art classes at the Fanno Creek House. • Outdoor Events:The City currently facilitates a few special events in its parks serving residents community-wide, such as the Tigard Balloon Festival at Cook Park. Outdoor events at City parks typically rely on other organizations and partners. For example,the Tigard Tree Lighting at Liberty Park is made possible with support from Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue, Downtown Tigard merchants,the Tigard Kiwanis Club,Tigard High School student volunteers,and the Tigard Chamber of Commerce. Individual groups can reserve park or facility space for events, paying a processing fee and/or special events permit fee,which varies based on the number of participants and the number of event hours. Special use or alcohol permits are also available for a fee. There is a community demand for more special events—with more variation in the size and scale of the events provided. Also, a new downtown plaza,funded through the 2010 voter-approved bond measure, is planned as part of the downtown redevelopment.This multi-purpose hardscape would provide a new space for events and programs. To activate these facilities and meet community demands,the City must play a stronger role as an event recruiter or coordinator,targeting small, medium and large special events and community gatherings,such as movies or concerts, markets,fairs and small festivals, community celebrations, walks and races,etc.These events may be held in City civic spaces, parks and trails, or other accessible sites as appropriate given the partners involved.The City's role is to recruit non-profits, businesses or other groups to serve as event producers in providing free or fee-based outdoor events. Once the downtown plaza is constructed, programming this plaza as a social hub for the city will be a major short-term effort. Similar to the programming model,the City should play a role as an event coordinator and facilitator, recruiting event providers and charging a reservation fee for the use its facilities. [Note: It is assumed that producers will bring or hire their own event staff or will have applied and have been approved to cover the cost of City staff involvement–e.g.,set-up, clean-up, advertising--through the City grant program.] Event reservation and permitting fees and policies should be reviewed to determine if Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 6 Tigard Recreation Program Study different rates should be charged for free and fee-based events and events that are open or closed to the public(see Policies and Organizational Needs). In time,the City may take on a greater role as event organizer and producer, helping expand on the current and past programs put on by the Police and the Library. • Indoor Events:The 2010 voter-approved bond measure also included funds for the Fanno Creek House, designed as a special use area to host small to medium-sized events, meetings and/or classes. This facility could be activated by a combination of programming, indoor events, and facility reservations (see Facility Reservations bullet below). City staff should play a role in recruiting non-profits, businesses or other groups to provide free or fee-based events at this facility or other appropriate indoor sites. Similar to the programming model,the City could act as both an event coordinator and facilitator, charging a reservation fee for the use its facilities. While producers will bring or hire their own event staff, City staff will be needed to monitor building use. Similar to outdoor events, reservation and permitting fees and policies should be reviewed to determine if different rates should be charged for free and fee-based events and events that are open or closed to the public(see Policies and Organizational Needs). In time, and in coordination with Tigard Library efforts,the City may take on a greater role as an organizer and producer of indoor events as well. • Facility Reservations: In Tigard,six park shelters and nine sports fields are currently available for rental. Picnic shelters may be reserved online or in person at the Tigard Public Works Building. Sports field reservations (and event reservations and permits as described above) are only conducted in person. In both cases, residents are offered a 50%discount. At this time,there are no opportunities to reserve meeting rooms or other spaces in City buildings, although there is a demand for space for club and community group use, as well as for private parties and gatherings. Short-term recommendations include making appropriate City rooms and facilities open to reservation, via an expanded and improved online and in person reservation system.This will open room reservations again and require coordination with other City Divisions and Departments, as well as new guidelines for use of facilities. For example, a Girl Scout meeting or child's birthday party could be held in the Fanno Creek House (although programs run by contracted staff will have first priority for room use).These reservations would have to be monitored by City staff with keys to lock and unlock buildings. In time, staff could be trained to offer event or activity support (for a fee), such as serving as a party host or game coordinator.The City should set a policy regarding reservation fees (see Policies and Organizational Needs). • Drop-In Activities:There is a need for drop-in recreation activities offered in different locations throughout the community to improve recreation access for residents.The City of Tigard should coordinate,staff, equip and host these activities.The City should offer activities in locations that serve identified underserved groups (e.g., low-income families,teens and seniors) at different sites (e.g., parks, schools, low income housing) across town.The drop-in activities may be organized as ongoing programs, such as a summer playground program that moves from park to park,or one-time special activities in conjunction with a group activity or community fair or festival. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 7 Tigard Recreation Program Study Resource Needs Implementing the seven programming elements noted above requires a variety of resources, including facilities,staffing, equipment,services and partnerships. Below is a short list of the anticipated labor(staff time) and physical resources needed for implementation, noted by program area. • Recreation Clearinghouse& Program Guide: o Staff time to collect and coordinate information for bi-annual recreation guide o Contracted printer for guide layout and printing(or use of staff time for in-house design and layout, with contracted time for printing) o Staff time to develop notifications of the guide's availability o Staff time for flyer development and distribution for advertising • Grants&Scholarships: o Staff time to review recreation and event grant applications o Staff time to develop scholarship fund and solicit contributions o Staff time to review scholarship applications and make awards o Increased grant funds o Scholarship funds • Programs&Classes o Staff time to recruit contract providers o Staff time for room/site scheduling and fee collection o Coordinated internal scheduling system o Increased janitorial services and facility maintenance o Use of existing City parks and facilities (e.g., Library, Public Works facilities, Senior Center, Fanno Creek House) o Potential coordination to use partner facilities (development of joint-use agreements) • Outdoor Events o Staff time to recruit event providers o Staff time for room/site scheduling and fee collection o Coordinated internal scheduling system o Increased janitorial services and facility maintenance o Use of existing City parks and outdoor facilities, plus new downtown plaza planned for construction Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 8 Tigard Recreation Program Study o Potential coordination to use partner facilities • Indoor Events o Staff time to recruit event providers o Staff time for room/site scheduling and fee collection o Coordinated internal scheduling system o Staff time for event monitoring and building open/close o In time,trained staff for event hosting and support o Increased janitorial services and facility maintenance o Use of existing City parks and facilities o Potential coordination to use partner facilities • Facility Reservations o Improved online facility reservation system (that includes staff reservations for facility use) o Staff time for in-person recreation reservations o Increased janitorial services and facility maintenance o Staff time for use monitoring and building open/close o In time,trained staff for event hosting and support • Drop-In Activities o Staff time for activity coordination and publicity o Staff time to host activities (travel, setup/cleanup and activities) o Recreation equipment (for playground program;for community festivals) o Equipment storage and transportation (recreation van) Policies and Organizational Needs Implementing the seven programming areas will require policy and organizational decisions to support this new area of service for the City of Tigard. The topics below have been identified by the planning team as important topics for the City to consider.The new Recreation Coordinator may be involved in developing and documenting new policies as determined by the City. • Recreation within City's Organizational Structure:The recommended "home"within the City's organizational structure for initial Recreation Services staff is under Public Works, parallel to or within the Parks group.This reflects the close relationship between the staff that manage and maintain facilities and the new recreation services that will utilize them. As services grow,this organizational structure should be revisited to ensure that Recreation is placed in the department where most appropriate. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 9 Tigard Recreation Program Study • Staffing Requirements: Recreation staff will be needed to monitor and implement recreation and events programming. Staff will adhere to existing personnel policies established by the City. In addition, the City should establish policies regarding requirements for staff presence at programs/events on City property or at activities implemented by City staff. Policies should clarify protocol such as the following: o The availability of City staff or"in kind support"for programs/events produced with others,with costs offset through the City's grant funding program for set-up, clean-up, advertising, and other services. o Lock/unlock procedures for indoor facilities, staff presence during contract-provider programs, and where staff must be stationed for safety and security during community or private facility use (e.g., by front door). o Requirements for event staff presence at outdoor events at City facilities, and whether park maintenance staff could meet these requirements if working in the same park during the time of the event. o Supervisory requirements for City staffed drop-in activities based on age and numbers of participants (e.g.,two staff per 30 elementary-aged kids in a playground program). o The use of volunteers, interns, staffing from partner organizations, etc.,for programming and event support. • Contract Provider Requirements: Before contract provided programs and events are initiated,the City will need to define requirements for these providers and for contracted services. This includes identifying contractor selection criteria and contract language for the provision of contract classes and events.The contract language may be similar to other City contract services, but may include special provisions to ensure the supervision and safety of recreation participants given the nature of the activities involved. It should define the types of recreation programs, events and services that are or are not allowable in different parks and city facilities. • Program Grant and Scholarship Criteria: In order to refine the existing community grant program and implement a scholarship program for individual participants,the City will need to establish the criteria that qualify applicants and assist in decision-making when allocating resources. • Investment Expectations(cost recovery/pricing philosophy):The amount of the City's investment in recreation will depend in part on the pricing policies it establishes for programs and services, as well as the cost recovery expectations that underlie those fees.The City will need to revisit and in some cases create new pricing policies that define how fees are set for programs, events,and facility reservations. It is recommended that following be considered in policy development: o Facility reservation fees should be based on time reserved (not time used).This can be based on blocks of time (e.g,four hours) or actual time in hourly increments.This policy is needed to prevent groups from reserving more time than needed and will free up facilities for reservation and use by other contract programs or groups. [Note:this policy represents a change in how sports field fees are charged.] o Facility fees should be set to recover direct costs for labor and materials associated with facility provision for programs and events, such as recreation staffing, equipment (if any), added janitorial services, and utilities (if these can be measured or estimated for the program/activity). Some direct costs may be charged separately,such as a separate sports field reservation charge and hourly field lighting charge. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 10 Tigard Recreation Program Study o Depending on what the market will bear, some indirect costs may be offset by facility use fees. These costs include such things as advertising and marketing,facility depreciation, general supplies (e.g. staff cell phone), accounting and payroll services, and other facility costs (building overhead). For example,the City may charge for a portion of indirect costs or add a $5/hour capital replacement fee for programs and events to offset the long-term impact on City facilities. o Policies should address if different rates should be charged for City residents and non-residents and non-profits vs. other for-profit or private facility users. o Special event policies should address whether different rates should be charged based on number of participants registered or anticipated. o Policies should address whether different rates should be charged for free and fee-based events offered on City property and events that are open or closed to the public. o Policies should identify where refundable deposits are required, such as for cleaning or damage. o Policies should address fees for special uses,such as vendors, alcohol and sound permits,special equipment rentals,application processing fees, reservation changes, added event monitors,etc. o In time, as the City transitions to a program provider(rather than recruiter and facilitator),the City should determine if different cost recovery rates should be set based on the types of participants served. For example, activities that have individualized benefits have a higher cost recovery rate than those with community-wide benefits. Activities for targeted underserved groups (e.g., low income,teens)may have lower cost recovery rates. • Field and Facility Allocation:To initiate recreation services and particularly as the numbers of programs, events and facility reservations increase,the City will need to establish a prioritized system for facility allocation. Cost efficiencies,cost revenues, number of people served, and a variety of other factors should be taken into consideration. Scheduling priorities could be identified as follows: o First scheduling priority is given to City-provided programs. o Second scheduling priority is for City-coordinated programs (contracted providers) and recreation providers with existing City facility use agreements. o Third scheduling priority is given to non-profits and/or recreation providers who would offer programs and events to targeted service groups or City residents of all ages. o Fourth scheduling priority is given to private firms and/or individuals interested in reserving facilities for private events, parties, or activities. • Strategic Use of Partner Facilities:The planning team recognizes that other public agencies and entities have available space that could (in time)support some type of recreation programs and/or events. The team recommends that the City coordinate and establish activities first in City facilities only. Once successful,the City may look to other available options, such as school buildings, churches,fire department rooms,etc.The City should establish guidelines and policies for the use of partner facilities, addressing factors such as whether the City would lease the space or obtain it through a joint use agreement,and recruit a contracted provider to program this space. Policies should address cost limits for what the City may pay for use of partner facilities. • Recreation Policies and Procedures Manual:All policies and procedures relating to the implementation of recreation services should be summarized in a cohesive manual. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 11 Tigard Recreation Program Study • Forms and Paperwork: New or updated forms (including online systems and/or paperwork)will be needed to implement services. Examples include the following: o Scholarship application form o Contract for contracted program providers o Facility joint use agreement o Facility reservation and special use permitting forms o Liability release for participants in drop-in activities if there is a risk of injury(e.g., playground activity). Dedicated time will be needed for the new Recreation Coordinator along with other City staff to review, establish and document new policies associated with the provision of recreation and event services. Some of these policies(e.g.,staffing requirement and cost recovery) will affect the cost factors for establishing and sustaining services. Implementation Plan Timeline The City should strive to implement short-term recommendations over the next five years. It will take five years to gradually ramp up tasks to the level of service now desired by the community. Table 1 illustrates tasks to set in motion during Years 1-5, also indicating what resources will be needed each year for implementation. In short, implementation is based on the following phasing strategy showing what is added or increased each year: • Year 1: Initial coordination, policy development and information, recreation guide start-up and printing, increase in grants, beginning of scholarship awards • Year 2: Pilot programs and outdoor events • Year 3: Increased grants, increased programs and outdoor events, establishment of pilot programs for indoor events • Year 4: Initiation of facility reservations and pilot programs for drop-in activities, increase in indoor events • Year 5: Increase in drop-in activities It is anticipated that Years 1-5 will coincide with the City's budgeting cycle and are considered to be fiscal years (July—June). During this time,the City may also continue to test community support for implementing longer-term goals. If support for a community center increases,the City may investigate partner support to develop a multi-purpose recreation center. Efforts to pursue longer-term goals should not preclude the advances in implementing short-term recommendations. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 12 sal9od pur muma sary 200 uoad put uolenws2+,ulna a,Rdn Pue o.,.• ,4140 l 041¢4 0 02,Had lopd 11npu01 „0101 F 044 wl s1R1wb 00,0002 H0N10ap141a11• uMOP ug,e4!p)24400 a wl .wood 4,!a Uwwaa+8e;stew.N1!1x1421ggels9. ;012100,ea+»+;110...N wddoasayl 0 0,100 NPYR!0 napuwd 112),Lppe 1 )2010, 902.090100 Pue 1111142)041 81gvl,rpe•s10)0,00041090001 puo»,0pu03. opopu.1,a9yrold 10000 04 lu!Pmuo.;;leap. 42)2 MINGO Uo paseq sal 904 wu1,etl 4sluana papaw satuN,AUe 4420 Pue slow 10110.4.02.1• 40!R>aW1ed 4120411emla umo1002092104,;12 !211;0.;lwtlof sgl.,n,+oddo.+;41244pMi$I0m• Purwap 42120 pur pompwd wane,.as221024) Dapasu w ansm11.101Pl0,elome 1ggPa4wly9..id 001 a.p 011 21puadR nuana to.4414 Pue)0000 asp a)2a>s1• um;001•••Pue pglopue!91140pp Mnpaym )0910 44110 ampa4n wawdganap ap Apuaq. so.mom w)01110wn.11aya PUe ssooe 9112)0)4421 Puestxtl 0000100 lMP NOlayw '044;;1104) -49000apem»y 4414200.00,40 os.01000292 sa.0)g19ndwopuro) all,wsq+M U,W4a 11x1 N114nw14lnaaaspawWlool AU)ansquo]• oe smaka M>ads to uwl10VxHM02W m+aWPue4a3.ameueopew put pummel pow.¢a!!Paps10o,0TR Pue swas,»mo)s,42Wl a000299n9 Powua,p VAN..puma,mod 01s11gaa put.48.1;0.uo- el41ua.,o*;4,10,4000 inw!1140 I)o0• e20 um0211904480,e 01201 in 1$0442wlw1)• sputa10);24 PalnWxl Pue pa1w1p1wrN!)1.121. 1214,80001121009)now F-£10»4(219442404• 02.10 Pue 20121 0040»0024)004440012091000. 4048322,020 01!1021 20)u sass.w swm2OM 0enuo0 ap!ro,001 Ho100 2*900tl*40019!'gxllwl;9,00 u,pea 0.80,0• salq)p01 Poe... 00111 .sua!8ol0 N luawl»nw F02)..1;00,,4 INN.,0441,0 )1402• N.P0o$u00)lsanunww lryl)ma08u0d 4140201• NWx9lapo,q sas0l,aPOaa4 pue'su2AOM 029 sauq 110S005 42nuu0-q lswle sass¢.Immo.10 ugaee,d 4040 a1en21e11x4001 14)1ytwoed to u21H0,0 mod..1quo1 asap pp4 I I walls 8u)npay>s Rwalws.000 alp andp p0PUne0We RM0u002011.10090pn!w10902 ewe.wd pu2•2101)1u01)0!0ww0101 oa)god mopewdo s,w12041002101012242 x0-1w01Ngoy 4.0010.3+ .4).124*0)wl 010,42,2(002121,1)wool lua9l•010244Wr2,•su2,8wd 1004 40 90 001 puo»1l,puo]• 'urpnwln9'w2)1*1 Pwpyayaslw1m1N 4.142,,1• p00049 1;9x0 pun App99200 po,00p 1;1)20 PUe Alpq!9.o. 929aa04204040.)law Pue swe,8old lqb 449024)• sanwe,AI!) pets 09000100 pose)»rypxl 400,040 saaml Pue 0410)I0400u0 pase9 sass.PUe su2121M 4.404. p.Pawaup ame010ewpue Mw,M00 »4100)0swe)9old awospued.wlegUawd Alpuap. su2Rwd apu••0)1wuwwdd0 sow.400 onm0• PM4w sum M+91992 aIRa411404000012anry ayl2(l sl10n00delo uo)PUe zapun4w4408u9npotos 1u0. u1.Px1)wyN110112saunsala4ss'0211011yND 04!11122,19 au puvMwlpeflelopgpe alRalxi sall9oel asa000.,020921400o F-£'Ha)umea r+gs4)9*4 saylxl PUe 219+e1)N!]4sa0psw+ayp We Aleg0p(104 08000*Aw040)211 0t 000,1O0AU)a11g1w). u21!u1+xMOWUO,ea)»+Pau0 pwolplarglu0l• NO)22 00wt)10al*2aw)pgeugwo1N04a+n21•0))u swab..ucue0V papw9 9-0 10 10 402!0e 1Rd• 2009 p.p0o+d sas0)0902 rw28otl 0094112)1,41• sassyl020021420 2+01¢,9002 d eer..0)• Pue rye,82008002 u+oleuW+,o)000221»12440.021• smpurpeocklo 4l pa 4.1,19021.04 pan,as,RUn 1,0400, pun.41014(mu4010o1.aps pxme 141 21»410 dgan1. 9.0 4.104,400 woe moo 029 o1889410001 0 we sassau1 q ro+!w 100921R»,2100104 04)4900)0 awd Poe pea 2.1001• uw00.0 d4sup4x suse..41 40000.. 2ue)21,00ryvq,yn we+21tl1)gsxl0yx .sae A94uegtlde,wnso,0002rodsur, (04022,0001 ss0.050/A200wuw>102442108 042. 01440M04000)nw00y144004.04410)2.2;14.12400• suo0n@ 100>iza0slq/Allunww0>asea100 q 22(05. 4400 0100,)0012)20400/Nunw,u0)4)2201 of*1100• Wpm ug4204tm*42004 Pun.dgnap402421192,01• 0x.14 PUe suq)2gn0 0x42 Pue s0l 2211)0 spxaepuew0209204 .012.12 P1ew0120ena 8lgwu*,204 Uwuawlpu•n a 1,0042120020o9209yep 40192 plea n41u40. 0002(91)4240..eo)02 tlgs+gOyxPue 11x)9 aroma%. 0010444.twwm0puad!40404,.PUe wr,8 anw1u0)2 00,2190429,awmgw40!q).2ply)s Pue,ue,t 40400)• 11!01000)wl Lump 41e0wa:puglu211 me..• .14,04,5 201100+0)luawawn0uue 0404 meal,. Nlp0 00 aping uompoo.p l stuauawna 2;12400 • 0410,1109,,420 2aA a a,0*4012104• .00)2.10 00.1;32 Pue sasswnspp)0)0001 00aawx!Uape gas. Rp2009t004, u 41.1.01.440M10 uw,,emgld 00442 )42 01.44 4.4 01201400 2,2900(4 0412214.11494 41)000]4s49e■1). 00900.d 00440011;1 woo 92,0)0 0042200 4)al0102;0 Pue 400;4,.Punu444n!921s1• ;04tH lenuue-!9+09 gw)&mu,' Ia4p015luawa00a1pa 41044,.0u!1u443• 5110.1)04j0 01 00u40421)2pe 80210000100)• 01,;.00 04 1104 0041+;,0210721 antigun,• ow.44)001 nuawxp,ape 802110wnl00). 0)00.9,0,»10M;94)2 uwlea0 21 41110212001(002 1109lenuue roe 00 a0"a u04eaw1090114wW s!seq pwur roe o2(ap,00002aw)upa1s44044. 0020lenuue roe 00;01031042;1»)0p2414ayn .1029 000)20,0,;0!109 Ugxaw109a414 Wx ,.1184120 000gwza aping l 4100 141xPwu0410)0)oo>awm00]4s1+aproA.201•;10,;»0010021 Oa)aw00014x„,00424Rdp•;2010;004 0.11001',Jaw,* ;)2010•w1w•■p cluw10,1P0o140w1u00:012291.0d 21epdn.Pue 1.pin„441».191200102111,...elk)0 40 4mu0p1. wa2Y047fl,01 442201 wew»1 au14aw1 uP1d uo!el0awaldwl:I 014121 Table 1:Implementation Plan Timeline •rowans Area or Need rep,one re.Two Year three Year Friar rear Five Indoor Events •re,rOnale wind the llLsary on sbategie+mid effm.to •Rdotan indialul al 2.3 evente ldrure.a nn8oing1, •launch CnYCOddruted and Ito Mated indoor special •Continue the bcuson activating Coy lxiMks through •provde events as an event coordin alai/facktamr advertmng these oppwtunipes m Ilse RecreatonGnde events.Schedule additional janitorial and maintevme iMoor evenh. •Create a contact list forewent provider.initiate Assign staff to mmnor facility use.Schedule additional tirne needed ••Pscuss with partners Cpportundtes to provide special discuss.ns with these prowlers to identity opportuncties janitorial and maintenance time needed Increase the numbers and types of events depending on a atria partner facilities based on context staff lo-event facilitation downtown •Evaluate prlol events and make any changes needed the interest of event producers and market demand availability and market demand •Review and update event reservation arts permitting fees•Conduct second round of pilot Indoor events,edvertmng •Establish faults joint-use agreements with partners: and policies these opporturglks in the Recreation Guide to..pilot program in partner fx tidy •Review the City s internal schedule for progtammlg: •Begin Identifying additional murders kr Year l indoor • and staff role to lee-based event Mack.support coordinate andhor eye.around Mh saheduk events leg pasty hosts,game coordinators.elcl • FxRPy Reservations •ESNblrsh/reline pricing poky for ixr lily reservations to •Implement online resew•inn system faith prime time •Co...making City fealties available to Individuals cover all costs of reservations. held for cla ses/recreation programs,which have fist and community groups by reservation •Research online facility reservation system that canhe N x y for hedulingl •Expand staff role to lee-based event Or aciiwtvsupport coordinated with City internal schedule of programs. •rAugment staff lime to cover in-person reservations (e.g.,party Trosts,game coordinators,e0.1 events and cksses •Assign start Io mnmt0n roam m lankly use Wiled, additional janitorial and maintenance time needed Peep-In ecWXles •Estebinhenerral scheduling system.business a n, r and expand drop-in xtivrtes,Drov6n operations pokies lot Makin recreation programs programs al different City sites for ddkrent age groups • rchas nsponalion and staffing •Psi with other• to provide •IdenMt tat pled sites for plot program:console! d,07-to activities at other ites such an schools,low- radiating a summer playground program that rotates on income housing,etc.Cormdet a partnership to provide four dIfferent dates to faun sides nods/meals to owimome residents In conjumnon with •Evaluate mot program and make a y changes needed tame Mop in actroties •In hme,consider revenue- trig appon twores to provide drop-in recreation activities Ion community groups anti agencies wring to pay for these recreates services Resources Needed - RecreotionStoffin9 •New Hire.Rerreabon Coordrrator(1 FT F1 •Recreation Coo,dmato,ll Fill •Percenten Coordmatm(1 FEE) •Recreation Coordinator ll MME) e n ordinao,(I FMtI •New HnenRe Suppor t Staff ll flF.Mel/23 •Recreation Staff(I Ft F:kkelc23 seasonal or seasonal.part-tune positrons pardome portions) Profsswnol Senores Y ,panting.marling for Recreation Garde •layout.prmmm4 naihnglar Recreation Guide •layout.printing.marling kr Recreation Gude •lalp.1.printing,mailing for Recreation Guide •Layout.prnnng,e sglg lm Recreation Guide fquiprent and Technology •Expanded enkne reservation system • anded online reservation system •Expanded online reservation system •Recreationequipment purchase(dropin activities) •Equipment replacement fund •Mobile rnreaton van or City vehicle use •Moble recreabon van or City vehicle use Wier City investment •Increased funding for graph and scholarships sued funding for grants and scholarships •increased funding for grants and scholarships •Continuedlundtng for grants andschalerlups •COn1mued funding for grants and scholarships •Staclpup fundng for pilot program and outdoor events •unsling for programs and outdoor events •Fuming for programs.outdoor and indoor events •Funding for pot m.o.events Cuntecovered costal lunrecover.toffs/ Facilities(including maintenace and •Use of CR/mired fauktes •USe el Cityownd facile. •Use of City ownedbc,Mies •Use of Cav-ownedfshtres •Use ofcny-snssed facgmes sanitorVI needs) •Ad6tinnalpnrtoral services,for v maintenance •add,I0ellannorul services,twiny maintenance •Addtennalptlmel wanes lx •Addtwel pntmal services.facility maintenance •Potential use.lease or rental of School Onrirkl ore other •Potential use.lease or rental of School PSlrat or other facilities(pending agreement) lxllIes(peed.agreement) Total Estimated Investment. 5209,000 5250,000.$225,000 $100,000-$500.000 0200,000-0800,000 $800,000 Potential Year of Implementallan FY 2015.16 FP 200.12 FY 2012-18 N 2018-19 fY 2019.20 •ins an explanation of cost estimates,see the secmn on Estimated Implementation Costs. Tigard Recreation Program Study Estimated Implementation Costs Planning level costs to implement the short-term service option are identified below,with observations about the longer-term cost implications. Estimates and observations focus on the costs associated with program implementation. Resources required for implementation of each program area are presented under the following categories.These same categories provide the framework for the "Resources Needed" as identified Table 1: Implementation Plan Timeline. • Recreation Staffing • Professional Services • Equipment and Technology • Other City Investment • Facilities Implementation costs can be estimated fairly reliably for Year 1 of implementation. Looking forward, however,the actual costs will vary based on policy decisions (such as cost recovery expectations and established fees)and assumptions about the degree of expansion of program options. For this reason, cost estimates are noted as ranges for Years 2-5.These estimated costs reflect a conservative approach for implementation, with total costs within the range of approval noted by respondents in the Recreation Program Survey completed in October 2014. Both internal City decisions and external factors(e.g., equipment costs,competition and market rates for recreation)will affect actual costs to provide the services noted in the implementation plan. Recreation Staffing The primary cost associated with the initiation of programming in Tigard is the hiring of a recreation professional to focus existing and new efforts of the City.A model job description defining the characteristics and duties of this position is included in Appendix D. • Recreation Coordinator(1.0 FTE): $130,000-$140,000 per year,which reflects the full cost of the employee. With the roll out of expanded program offerings, additional support staff will be needed to assist in implementation. • Recreation Support Staff(multiple seasonal or part time totaling 1.0 FTE):$90,000-$100,000 Professional Services The layout, printing and mailing of the recreation guide can be done cost effectively using professional services, rather than City staff for this task.While there are many variables in how the recreation guide could be produced and distributed (including doing some of the work in-house), a cost estimate for these services is based on similar publications utilizing a mix of paper and online distribution. • Total recreation guide production budget: $40,000 • In the first year,the City should target off-setting this cost by 50%through the sale of advertisements and listings for other recreation providers and services. • In following years,a more aggressive target should be achievable. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 15 Tigard Recreation Program Study Equipment and Technology For the initial two years, no new equipment or technology will be needed to support the recommended program implementation. However, as the City offers more contracted programs and facilities for reservation, an online reservation system will be an essential in Year 3 to minimize staff time in processing paper applications and registrations. Further,as new recreation options are explored and implemented,the City should establish a budget for the necessary equipment.This will vary based on the types of programming implemented in Year 4 but may include rental, lease or purchase of event support equipment,supplies and equipment needed directly by drop-in activities and programs, or the necessary transportation to bring equipment for drop-in activities to locations around the city.The anticipated budget amounts for equipment and technology are listed below: • Year 3: $100,000 • Year 4: $300,000 • Year 5: $200,000 Other City Investment The direct investment in providing recreation opportunities will come in the form of City-provided grants, scholarships and start-up funding for pilot programs.Starting immediately in Year 1, additional grant and scholarship funding will open up opportunities for more Tigard residents to take advantage of recreation opportunities that already exist in the community.This investment will need to grow in Year 2 to support the development of pilot programming options, which will later be more self-sustaining. Beginning Year 3, an increase in both grant funding and funding for programs and pilot indoor and outdoor events will be needed.This amount carries forward into Years 4 and 5.The following assumptions are reflected in the numbers below: • Year 1: $56,000 • Year 2: $75,000-$100,000 • Year 3 forward: $200,000 Facilities The direct costs of opening, securing and cleaning City-owned facilities and/or monitoring events is intended to be captured in, and largely covered by,facility-use fees paid by a contracted provided or person who reserves the facility for a private event. Consequently, no facility costs are noted for Years 1-4 of program implementation. However,there may be costs associated with the use of non-City facilities,such as schools and churches, in Year 5. Partner facilities may be reserved by the City(as per a negotiated joint use agreement)to bring programming opportunities closer to where users live and to underserved areas of the community. Securing these locations may require maintenance or reservation fees that are not completely recovered through fees paid by a contracted program provider. These assumptions are noted in the numbers below. [Note:while direct costs for facilities are estimated below,the management, maintenance and operations of City facilities will increase City staff workload and may ultimately result in additional indirect costs to the City.These indirect costs are not estimated here.] • Year 5 : $100,000(for investment in access to non-City facilities) Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 16 Tigard Recreation Program Study Proposed Funding Approach Based on responses noted in the voter survey conducted in November 2014,there appears to be sufficient support for a recreation funding measure in the near future. Respondents showed a likelihood of supporting a taxing measure at a level somewhere between$20 and $60 per year for the average household. While it will take time to get a funding measure introduced and approved, City staff and Council should consider the approval of City funds initiate Year 1 recommendations to show progress toward City Council's goal of establishing a recreation program in FY 2015-16.This action will help make the strongest possible case for voters to continue to support recreation programming through an added funding mechanism. This proposed funding approach is described briefly below. • Initial Funding:The City should make the initial investment to start a City recreation program. This amounts to designating City funds to support the first two years of the Implementation Plan.An approved budget for Year 1 allows the City to hire the first essential staff position, begin outreach efforts, and immediately increase community recreation opportunities by providing added support through recreation grants and scholarships. Future budget allocations for Year 2 (not yet approved) would allow the City to initiate pilot recreation programs and classes.This allows the City to explore recreation options and make quick advancements in a practical, results-oriented way, all the while building a broader constituency for a funding vote at the end of Year 2. • Additional Funding:The City will need additional funding to implement the increased level of service for recreation that is proposed for Year 3.To do this,the City should begin immediately in Year 1 considering the types of funding options that could provide the necessary funding for Years 3-5 and beyond. Potential options include a utility tax, a five-year renewable local option levy, or the establishment of a Park and Recreation District.The longer-term question regarding the development of a multi-purpose recreation center may influence the type of funding mechanism desired. Either way, the City will want funding in place to advance recreation options in the first five years—whether or not additional facilities or programs are planned for the long term. Community education regarding the value of the proposed recreation program should begin early in Year 2. This would require an effective marketing campaign to raise awareness about the improvements/expansion of programming-related activities that are being set in motion in Year 2. To have funding in place to support Year 3 recommendations,the City should put a funding measure on the ballot in November of Year 2. If approved,the funding amount would be used to increase recreation services, as per the City's budgeting process for fiscal Year 3, and then subsequently for Years 4 and 5. If the measure is not approved in Year 2,the City will need to identify through its budgeting process the level of funding that can be supported for Year 3 services. Depending on Council goals that year,the City should revisit its strategy to obtain voter-support for enhanced recreation services. Recommendations and Implementation Plan Page 17 daxko T2 consu I ng Feasibility Study YMCA of Columbia-Willamette and the City of Tigard May 2015 From: Daxko T2 Consulting 600 University Place #500 Homewood, AL 35209 Table of Contents Purpose and Methodology 2 Respondent Demographics and Psychographics 3 Current Exercise Habits 7 Demand for Programs and Facilities 9 Convenience of Potential Locations 12 Financial Support for New Facility 13 Financial Support and Membership Forecast for New Facility 14 Conclusions and Recommendations 18 Appendix 20 Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 1 Purpose and Methodology Purpose: The YMCA of Columbia-Willamette and the City of Tigard are exploring the feasibility of the city building a facility operated by the YMCA and funded by tax dollars. This study was specifically scoped to include data pertaining to: appropriate pricing;forecast memberships and usage; and forecast demand for program, facilities and features.The results of this study may also be used to identify areas where additional inquiry and analysis may be of value to the decision-making process. Goal: Use research to help inform facility planning. Methodology Telephone interviews were completed with 501 respondents who were selected at random among registered voters who live in Tigard. The community response rate was approved by project stakeholders and represents an industry standard of a 4.32% margin of error with a 95%confidence level. Almost all the respondents were located within a 2.5 mile radius (see map below). Respondents were allowed to skip certain questions or select more than one answer, as was appropriate for each question. Data reports filtered by YMCA members and community members can be found in the Appendix. Respondent type #of respondents %of respondents Community members (non-Y member) 380 75.9% Former Y members 48 9.6% Current Y members 73 14.6% Total 501 100.0% Locations of Respondents _;.- - �•.�. - � s �., T �-�n.u.;,� � n...—„tom I�111�•2?',i.�u f� `" -i V Ali--� :;' r1 irE1V 7' 77;. fY_ tan / i G •� �r �.,1i1Ire r��+■`��9r N� �%i- I� c1 ]a r��.• w �t�.a�'I��'-'��y,�t �. limpam 'LF....�V-nw��'w� �,.w �� +li f. r�`_.1� 11 al I ,��'ftt� � �� 1� � �^',�,EE;'�i�R w.'174 -�r',, 1V/IEa+i _ L>�4.5 3144 it �,1.Hi t,.. -gAtu.2 „ i],11111�,� 7 y+`-+= '1�ti cif.� j C r�, l�Ya .r ..�r�1�' '� Z j , iay� r i ty� ,,,�•+�f w �'�' ' it r a4svu;47, �7' 61� 5S f1ftwi C-y �j„�%�'A ilw, _ ! •r G ,L j r rll� 0 +k41 ! 1"st l',`.�' i..ta Jy �r,4 ilic a W Alalil! _Iii W g, i, 16.11.1.,,ortlIpc 72,,t,„. Ifwzr-7 ivig_.....-4-„, - CilltA4A-;*.7";-;Wde4t;, —Voil„,_, -...40.44704~4.,..— ._. 271A„ .4,N_3:,:7,..=PRA!'. Alft, hir,,tip:,P1*.,:-.4t. . 11k,V4 _. afriv 41-'" -7_.. , iiii;g5„,„,,i14-. =„6„..;ifiLawri;....tg,,s,/......,.*t..0,2t.2 Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 2 Respondents Demographics and Psychographics The following section contains both market area psychographics based on U.S. Census data and discrete respondent demographics. Demographic information collected via the study specific to respondents included gender, age, children living at home and household income. Females and males respectively represented 67.3%and 32.7%of total responses. Additional details are presented below. Respondent ages were as follows (n = 493). The age distribution show that seniors are over- represented, which is not uncommon in studies of this type. The forecasts presented in later sections of this report there are adjusted to normalize age according to the age distribution found in the actual population. %of Age respondents Age Teens 0.2% 70+ 20's 1.4% 60s 30's 5.7% 50s 40's 14.4% 40s 30s 50's 21.3% 20s 60's 30.2% Teens 70+ 26.8% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 100.0% Respondent incomes were as follows (n=501): Annual income %of respondents Income Up to$35,000 13.0% Over$100,000 $35,001 to$50,000 15.2% $50,001 to$100,000 $50,001 to$100,000 38.2% Over$100,000 33.6% $35,001 to$50,000 IMIN 100% Up to$35,000 0.0% 5.0% 10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0% Preferred not to answer 26.1% Daxko T2 Consulting:Data Driven Solutions 3 Respondents Demographics and Psychographics, cont. 21.0% of respondents currently have children living in their home (n =496): Number of Children<18 Living at Home All Respondents 0 79.0% 1 5.2% 2 9.7% 3 3.6% 4+ 2.4% 100.0% 89.2% of respondents own their home (n= 501): Own or Rent Home All Respondents Own 89.2% Rent 7.6% Prefer not to answer 3.2% 100.0% Daxko T2 Consulting:Data Driven Solutions 4 Respondents Demographics and Psychographics, cont. The market area data presented below is derived from the U.S. Census and includes both Tapestry Segmentation and Market Profile information for the city limits of Tigard. The former describes detailed market area neighborhood information, including patterns within a given area. Market Profile data represents demographic information based on population trends. Market Profile demographics representing the market area as a whole show there are nearly 20,000 households in the Tigard market area, and the population is growing faster than the U.S. as a whole. While age, %of households with children and home ownership are close to the national averages, median family income and home values are considerably higher. Race and ethnicity representation is comparative to national averages with the exceptions of smaller Black and higher Asian percentages of residents. Market Profile Tigard Market Area US Total Population Households 19,630 119,862,927 Individuals 49,324 316,296,988 Avg. household size 2.50 2.57 Annual growth 2014-2019 1.03% 0.75% Median Age 37.9 37.3 Households with children 33.3% 33.4% Financials Median family income $65,976 $52,076 Median home value $302,733 $190,791 own home 56.2% 56.0% own home 39.2% 32.4% %vacant homes 4.6% 11.6% Race White 78.1% 71.2% Black 2.2% 12.7% Asian 8.6% 5.1% Other 11.1% 11.0% Total 100% 100.0% Ethnicity %Hispanic 15.4% 17.5% Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 5 Respondents Demographics and Psychographics, cont. Tapestry Segmentation demographics describe the market area population by defined nationally recognized lifestyle categories referred to as segments. There are more than 60 national types of Tapestry segments used to describe population trends for the Tigard market area. The five most frequent lifestyles make-up 58.8%of the area's population compared to only 9.2% of the U.S. population. Tapestry Segments %of Tigard Households Bright Young Professionals 15.3% Soccer Moms 14.7% Enterprising Professionals 10.3% Emerald City 9.8% Metro Fusion 8.7% Total 58.8% Recognized definitions of the top five Tapestry segments for the Tigard market area are: Bright Young Professionals is a large market, primarily located in urban outskirts of large metropolitan areas.These communities are home to young, educated, working professionals. One out of three householders is under the age of 35. Slightly more diverse couples dominate this market,with more renters than homeowners. More than two-fifths of the households live in single-family homes;over a third live in 5+unit buildings. Labor force participation is high, generally white-collar work, with a mix of food service and part-time jobs(among the college students). Median household income, median home value, and average rent are close to the US values. Residents of this segment are physically active and up on the latest technology. Soccer Moms is an affluent,family-oriented market with a country flavor. Residents are partial to new housing away from the bustle of the city but close enough to commute to professional job centers. Life in this suburban wilderness offsets the hectic pace of two working parents with growing children.They favor time- saving devices, like banking online or housekeeping services, and family-oriented pursuits. Enterprising Professionals residents are well educated and climbing the ladder in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics)occupations.They change jobs often and therefore choose to live in condos, town homes, or apartments;many still rent their homes.The market is fast-growing, located in lower density neighborhoods of large metro areas. Enterprising Professionals residents are diverse, with Asians making up over one-fifth of the population.This young market makes over one and a half times more income than the US median, supplementing their income with high-risk investments.At home, they enjoy the Internet and TV on high-speed connections with premier channels and services. Emerald City's denizens live in lower-density neighborhoods of urban areas throughout the country. Young and mobile, they are more likely to rent.Well educated and well employed, half have a college degree and a professional occupation. Incomes close to the US median come primarily from wages and self-employment. This group is highly connected, using the Internet for entertainment and making environmentally friendly purchases. Long hours on the Internet are balanced with time at the gym. Many embrace the"foodie"culture and enjoy cooking adventurous meals using local and organic foods. Music and art are major sources of enjoyment.They travel frequently, both personally and for business. Metro Fusion is a young, diverse market. Many residents do not speak English fluently and have moved into their homes recently.They are highly mobile and over three quarters of households are occupied by renters. Many households have young children;a quarter are single-parent families.The majority of residents live in midsize apartment buildings. Metro Fusion is a hard-working market with residents that are dedicated to climbing the ladders of their professional and social lives.This is particularly difficult for the single parents due to median incomes that are 35% lower than the US level. Daxko T2 Consulting:Data Driven Solutions 6 Current Exercise Habits Purpose: The objective of the section was to capture frequency and location of exercise in the Tigard market area. Question(s): "How often do you exercise per week"; "Where do you exercise most often"? Findings of Interest: Nearly 61%of respondents currently exercise 3+times per week. This is a strong percentage compared to other YMCA markets studied by Daxko T2 Consulting. While almost a third of respondents mentioned a non-Y fitness facility in generic terms, only a quarter could name the specific facility they use. 24 Hour Fitness was most often mentioned, followed by LA Fitness and Planet Fitness.There is a 24 Hour Fitness "Super-Sport"club type, Tualatin Super Sport, located in Tigard; all three corporations have locations in nearby Beaverton. The "other" locations provided included running, walking outdoors and golf. All who indicated they exercised at a YMCA identified the Sherwood Y, with one mentioned of the Beaverton Hoop YMCA. (These findings are displayed on the next page). Exercise frequency All respondents(n=501) 3+times per week 60.7% 2 times per week 14.4% 1 time per week 4.2% I don't exercise on a regular basis 20.8% Total 100.0% % of Exercise Per Week ■3 or more times a week 2 times a week 4.2% 14.4`:x Once a week t I don't exercise on a regular basis Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 7 Current Exercise Habits, cont. Exercise location ... All respondents(n=397) At home 50.1% Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym 32.5% YMCA 4.8% Other 12.6% Total 100.0% Fitness facilities used ... All respondents(n=50) 24 Hour Fitness 7.6% LA Fitness 2.4% Planet Fitness 2.2% Club Sport 1.4% Crunch 1.2% Curves 1.2% Harman Pool 0.8% Providence,OR fitness location(s) 0.8% Crossfit location(s) 0.4% Fit Academy 0.4% Mercantile Health and Fitness Center 0.4% Tigard Aquatic Center 0.4% 28 others (1 mention each) 5.6% Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 8 Demand for Programs and Facilities Purpose:The objective of this section was to garner impressions of demand for programs the facility may offer. This was accomplished by respondents rating a list of pre-existing options, providing open-ended offering preferences, and potential facility interest by any children present in the home. Question(s): "Please tell me whether you or someone in your household would use the following never, sometimes or often".Their responses are included verbatim in the Appendix to this report and are categorized below (n=711). Respondents were also asked an open-ended question to gather additional preferences. These replies are included verbatim in the Appendix. Findings of Interest: "Pool" (46.7%) and "cardiovascular equipment" (45.7%) were reported as the items most likely to be used "often"of the programs, equipment and facilities tested. When combining "often"and "sometimes" responses, a pool, cardiovascular equipment and weights were the items most most likely to be used. The least used ratings were those related to families and children, however even though used by only a small percentage of members,these programs may be necessary to attract members who do have children. Would use ... Often Often+Sometimes n= Pool 46.7% 69.8% 490 Cardiovascular equipment 45.7% 74.6% 492 Free weights or machine weights 32.9% 64.2% 492 Group exercise classes 23.5% 52.9% 489 Yoga and pilates 22.2% 52.9% 491 Open gym time 17.8% 39.5% 489 Starter fitness programs 16.9% 52.7% 491 Spinning/group cycling 11.2% 32.8% 491 Personal training 9.2% 38.5% 491 Classes for youth 7.3% 16.7% 491 Family exercise classes 5.5% 17.5% 490 Child Watch 5.1% 8.8% 490 Specific classes for teens 4.1% 13.7% 489 Would use often... Additional comments Pool continued on next Free weights or machine weights for strength page Yoga and Pilates • Starter fitness programs Personal Training Family Exercise classes and games like kickball, won Specific classes for teens/teen programming im 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 9 Demand for Programs and Facilities, cont. Questions and findings, cont: More than a quarter (27.8%) of respondents also provided replies to a open-ended question, "What other facilities, equipment or programs would be important to you and your household?". Comments were categorized as-given verbatim and therefore may be redundant to items presented in the previous question. Comments categorized as `other"were too diverse to be quantified in a discrete grouping. The most frequent replies had to do with the following topics: Summary of open-ended responses by topic %of respondents Pool (in addition to interest expressed in previous question) 3.4% Seniors 2.6% Racquetball 1.8% Sauna 1.6% Water aerobics 1.2% Basketball 0.6% Others 16.2% Among respondents with children living at home, over 70% say their children would be interested in using a new YMCA facility (n= 104): I Children interested in using the Y? % responses Interested 71.2% Neutral 18.3% Not interested 10.5% Total 100.0% % of children interested in using the Y Ill •Interested ■Neutral Not Interested Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 10 Demand for Programs and Facilities, cont. Questions and findings, cont: Those with children were asked if their children would be interested in the program in the table below. For each program listed, more than half of all respondents with children responded "yes", indicated strong interest (n=93). Among the "other" responses, only dance, art classes and rock climbing were given as being `of most interest"to more than one respondent. Would children use ... % "of most interest" Open swim time 89.3% Open gym 67.7% Youth sports program(s) 63.4% Meet friends 57.0% Swim lessons 54.8% Other 30.1% % of most interest for those with children Other(please specify) Swim Lessons Meet Friends Youth Sports Program Open Gym Open Swim Time 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 11 Convenience of Potential Locations Purpose: The objective of this section was to introduce two potential locations for a new YMCA facility and compare respondent impressions of convenience. This was accomplished by separately reading potential locations listed below, with respondents providing discrete, scaled ratings for each. Ouestion(s) : "One suggested location is in Downtown Tigard, on the trail system"; and, "Another suggestion is the 99 Corridor near Bull Mountain". They were then asked to rate, "On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being most convenient and 1 being very inconvenient, how convenient is this location for you?" The following charts show the complete responses. Findings of Interest: More than 75% reported Downtown Tigard as"very convenient"or"convenient", compared to 60.7%for Bull Mountain. Similarly, Bull Mountain was 2.8 times more likely to have been rated "inconvenient"or"very inconvenient". Past YMCA feasibility studies conducted by Daxko T2 Consulting have demonstrated that if the "somewhat"+"very"convenient ratings are at least 75%that the location is unlikely to have any negative effect on demand at the site. Convenience of proposed location ... Downtown Bull Mountain Tigard(n=501) (n=501) Very convenient 50.3% 41.9% Convenient 25.2% 18.8% Neutral 13.0% 15.2% Inconvenient 3.6% 10.4% Very inconvenient 4.4% 12.2% Unfamiliar 3.6% 1.6% Total 100% 100% Very convenient+convenient 75.5% 60.7% Very inconvenient+inconvenient 8.0% 22.6% % Convenience by location 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% Very convenient Convenient Neutral •Tigard •Bull Mountain Very inconvenient Inconvenient Unfamiliar Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 12 Financial Support for New Facility Purpose: The objective of this section was to capture homeowner support for a new YMCA facility potentially paid for via an increase in property taxes.This was accomplished by screening respondents for homeownership and voting habits prior to asking the following question. Question(s) : `The YMCA and the City of Tigard are considering a collaboration to build a new community center owned by the city. The building would be over 60,000 square feet, deliver a full array of programming and activities, and would require voters to consider a property tax increase of about $10 per month for the average homeowner. What is your willingness to pay this amount to build a center?" (n =446). Findings of Interest: 93.4% of respondents voted in the last Presidential election, and 89.2% own their homes. The largest group of homeowners (41.9%) indicated they would support the proposal; 19.1% would not and 39.0%were "unsure" or"need more information". Opposition is comparatively low to those in favor of the proposal (NOTE: These findings are representative of market research based methodologies and may differ from voter polling analysis). Support of property tax increase to build facility... %of homeowners Support 41.9% Oppose 19.1% Not sure 15.9% Need more information 23.1% Total 100% % of Homeowners Support for Proposal 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% Support Need More Information Not Sure Oppose Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 13 Financial Support and Membership Forecast for New Facility Purpose:To determine demand for membership, respondents were asked to identify which YMCA membership type would apply to their household. Based on their reply, they were then provided membership type-specific pricing ranges to rate for likelihood of joining the new facility at varying price points. This approach collected detailed information required to forecast membership demand. This data was normalized to account for age distribution within the community. Questions) : "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" (n= 501). "The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest." (n=426). Findings of Interest: The most commonly selected membership types were "family membership of 2 adults and no children" (29.3%) and "family membership of 2 adults with children" (29.3%). 15.0% of respondents indicated they had "no interest in any health/recreation center". Three membership types received too little interest to statistically forecast (italicized below).The projections therefore focus on the four types with substantive representation (94.5% of responses). The change in demand as price is increased is small except at the lowest price; indicating lowering the price results in a moderate increase in demand. Membership Type Interest %of respondents Family membership-2 adults 29.3% Family membership-2 adults with children 29.3% Adult(age 26-64) 23.1% Senior(age 65+) 12.8% Family members-1 adult with 1 children 3.4% Teen/Young Adult(age 13-25) 1.4% Youth(under 13) 0.7% Interest in Membership hypes 3.4% 1.4% 0.7% •Family Membership:2 Adults ■Family Membership:2 Adults with child(ren) a Adult(ages 26-64) Senior(65+) •Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 14 Financial Support and Membership Forecast for New Facility, cont. Price levels utilized for membership demand: Membership Type Highest price Next highest Middle price Next lowest Lowest price price price Family-2 adults $51.00 $49.00 $47.00 $44.50 $42.00 Family-2 adult and children $62.00 $59.00 $56.00 $53.00 $50.00 Adult $41.00 $39.00 $37.00 $33.00 $30.00 Senior $37.50 $35.50 $34.00 $32.00 $29.00 Family-1 adult and 1 child $52.00 $49.50 $47.00 $44.50 $42.00 Teen/young adult $25.00 $23.50 $21.00 $20.00 $19.00 Youth $21.00 $19.50 $18.00 $16.50 $15.00 % "very likely to join"at each price level: Membership Type Highest price Next highest Middle price Next lowest Lowest price price price Family-2 adults 25.9% 26.9% 31.8% 34.9% 44.8% Family-2 adult and children 30.9% 33.9% 35.9% 36.8% 51.8% Adult 17.7% 17.7% 20.2% 26.5% 36.6% Senior 16.7% 16.7% 19.0% 20.6% 30.3% Price Curve %very likely to join 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% .- 10.0% 0.0% Highest price Next highest price Middle price Next lowest price Lowest price -Family Membership:2 Adults -Family Membership:2 Adults with child(ren) Adult(ages 26-64) Senior(65+) Daxko T2 Consulting:Data Driven Solutions 15 Financial Support and Membership Forecast for New Facility, cont. Findings of interest, cont: Market demographic data (page 5) shows 19,360 families living in the Tigard market area. For forecasting purposes, only families with incomes greater than $50,000 were included, equating to 12,053 households. When a homeownership parameter is applied to this population, the applicable population is scoped to include 10,778 homeowners. These demographic characteristics represent the proposed facility target market. The forecast was then calculated by multiplying the% "very likely to join"times the number of families and the % of families in each membership type. The forecast immediately below displays the full potential of the new facility based on the facility meeting respondent expectations, such as this pertaining to location and program offerings. Based on industry standards with similar studies, a standard reduction factor of 35% was then applied to this data in order to provide a conservative estimate. It should be noted that the forecast increased by 37%from the "next lowest"and "lowest" price levels; this represents an increase approximately 3 times greater than differences in all other price level variances. Industry standards of market research indicate this outlier should be discarded; meaning this large of an increase at the lowest price level likely indicates the level is unrealistically low and should not be considered in facility planning. Full potential forecast: Membership Type Highest price Next highest Middle price Next lowest Lowest price price price Family-2 adults 865 899 1,063 1,165 1,496 Family 2 adult and 1,032 1,131 1,199 1,230 1,730 children Adult 466 466 533 698 965 Senior 243 243 278 300 442 Total potential new membership units 2,606 2,739 3,073 3,393 4,633 at price level Final forecast after reduction factor: Membership Type Highest price Next highest Middle price Next lowest Lowest price price price Family-2 adults 562 584 691 757 972 Family 2 adult and 671 735 779 799 1,125 children Adult 303 303 346 454 627 Senior 158 158 181 195 287 Total potential new membership units 1,694 1,781 2,205 2,205 3,012 at price level Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 16 Financial Support and Membership Forecast for New Facility, cont. Those who indicated they were"very likely to join are locations throughout the market area; addresses of these respondents plotted in red below: •acs- _yL:.,.:i� Am.V.: ►.■ 'IL-- ` J_L•_ . :.' 4 ila4Tailli Ili 1:..••�C L, .•1 11 /1 i; it-`- - i€�e' v `tom F,'.. 1"Y""1► 6t: it � 40=- . "'�,i lu is li Its, = - X19 I. ,,,',.‘,, tl a.v �.. � C.'F'-i jR. t.:I \x � Z ♦ Illr _� •orriAl. fir. 's • '''"'".7,M =.i i s -\uu 't+. '�t, .�" C�ti � a+ f�a•�192,'�r Ipnp'v' I,!„,r-I � � �� . 1�1 ..,i4 �cj3 � 1 _ a':.^; . IT �tcig. i+il� a � wr,,.lr �4t� �! 111 �'r-;� ,'j�� ,.r�� _.� 111r1,1Y. 6 :-E:� --^/�-.-,i_L_ sl -�``S�i t- 4; v�}� rivAt,.rpp'1�r�•- r r- Ij. 1 r � —F-41--��W\?�� Si...;;', 1`,' ♦I+.T�t+ �� :lillll�![.� �1 r;'� 'Tr4 �� Y i /ri?_a�+� �:�°I}li�ul•�5�: .j ta.. 1th � �r Di •i ' +!1R.R Y� 0 tl �1-I J`",4g;� ! ii,4f 0 4t a 41 __ y' • Iii _ ° ,�' _inir iiriNhilr 1! r-- ' ''''' ' litilUe m. F=r`: ' 04111" --.41/1101.4.144,WAM Tigard's population is growing at a rate of 1.03% annually.Adjusting the forecast to account for this rate of increase, the following table forecasts potential membership 3 years from now, ranging from 1,747 to 3,106 membership units depending on price level: Membership Type Highest price Next highest Middle price Next lowest Lowest price price price Family-2 adults 580 603 713 781 1,003 Family-2 adult and 692 758 804 824 1,160 children Adult 312 312 357 468 647 Senior 163 163 186 201 296 I Total potential new 1 membership units 1,747 1,836 2,060 2,274 3,106 „_•! at price level Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 17 Conclusions and Recommendations Conclusions The intent of this section is to list identifiable trends and learnings from this study. They include, but may not be limited to: 1. Tigard has 20,000 households with excellent demographics and lifestyles (see Tapestry Segmentation and Market Profile in Appendix) for a YMCA. Incomes and home values are notably high compared to many YMCA markets and families are primarily educated professionals. 2. Tigard's population has a high incidence of regular exercise and a relatively high use of exercise facilities. Only about 5% use a Y currently. Use of for-profit fitness centers is strong and those used most often are not located in Tigard. 3. A"pool" (46.7%) and "cardiovascular"(45.7%) exercise were reported to be the most likely used facilities or offering of interest at a potential Tigard YMCA. 4. 71.2% of respondents with children living at home reported their children would be "very interested" in using the potential Y facility. Every child-related program offerings mentioned in the survey was rated as"of most interest"to their children by more 50% of respondents. 5. 41.9% of homeowners would support a$10/month property tax increase for a new Y facility; 39.0% are unsure or would need more information. Opposition to this measure is comparatively low (19.1%). (As noted on page 13, these findings are representative of market research based methodologies and may differ from voter polling analysis). 6. The Y membership type indicated as most applicable to respondents were "two adults"and "two adults and children", equating to 58.6% of respondents. Single adult and senior members represented 35.9% of those surveyed. The remaining membership types totaled a nominal 5.5%. 7. Demand was approximately 30%greater at the next-to-lowest price ($20/month) than at the highest price ($25/month). The is a comparatively small increase compared to other feasibility studies conducted by Daxko T2 Consulting. It should be noted that demand at the lowest price ($19/month) increases by a large amount and therefore we conclude it is an unrealistically low price which should not be considered for use. We conclude that a new facility in Tigard would have approximately 1,747 to 2,274 membership units within 3 years. Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 18 Recommendations The intent of this section is to list likely and/or logical subsequent actions and considerations as this particular planning process proceeds: 1. We recommend that Tigard move to the next step in developing a new Y facility by using the forecast of demand at different price levels, determining the capital and operating costs for each, and deciding what size facility is most feasible. 2. With the most common response (41.9%) being in favor of the new facility and a combined 39.0% of the market"needing more information"or"not sure"of their support for this proposal, we recommend that plans be developed to publicize the potential facility to the community in light of low opposition. 3. Confirming what, if any, additional analysis is of interest to the decision making process. Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 19 APPENDIX Survey Market Profile Demographic U.S. Census data Tapestry Segmentation Residential U.S. Census data Filtered Survey Data Export of YMCA member and non-member responses Coded Verbatim Comments Attachment 1: "Tigard coded Verbatims"Excel workbook delivered to client as separate attachment to this report Attachment 2: "Tigard Other Comments"Excel workbook delivered to client as separate attachment to this report Daxko T2 Consulting: Data Driven Solutions 20 YMCA of Columbia Willamette/City of Tigard Feasibility March 2015 Introduction and Exercise Habits My name is calling on behalf of the YMCA and the City of Tigard (pronounced TIE-gurd). We're speaking with people in the area to determine interest in an expansion of community programs and services in your community. Could you help us by taking a few minutes to share your opinions with us? Thank you! 1. Are you or any child in your household a member of the YMCA or have you been a member in the past? ✓ No ✓ Yes ✓ Former Member LOGC Hidden unless: Question "Are you or any child in your household a member of the YMCA or have you been a member in the past?" #1 is one of the following answers ("Yes","Former Member") 2. Where are/were you a member? • Griffith Park Family YMCA ✓ Sherwood Regional Family YMCA ✓ Other (please specify) 3. How often do you exercise per week? C 3 or more times a week r' 2 times a week r' Once a week r' I don't exercise on a regular umic Hidden unless: Question "How often do you exercise per week?" #3 is one of the following answers ("3 or more times a week","2 times a week","Once a week") 4. Where do you exercise most often? r` At home • Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym (which one?) ✓ YMCA (which one?) r' Other (please specify) Programs The YMCA is excited about the work they do to help all ages and segments of the community to get and stay healthy and is studying how a new facility would best serve the community. 5. I'm going to read a list of YMCA facilities. Please tell me whether you or someone in your household would use following never, sometimes or often. Never Sometimes Often Classes for youth such as art, music, dance, theater r C C Open gym time c C C Free weights or machine weights for strength training C C C Personal Training r r c Spinning/Group Cycling C C c Child Watch (while parents work out) r C C Specific classes for teens/teen programming r r C Yoga and Pilates r r C Pool r r r Group exercise classes such as: Body Sculpt, Zumba, Step Aerobics, TRX r r r Family Exercise classes and games like kickball, family Olympics and family Zumba, family Yoga C r c Starter fitness programs C C C Cardiovascular Equipment like treadmills, bikes or elliptical r C C 6. What other facilities, equipment or programs would be important to you and your household? 7. Do you have children under the age of 18 in your household? c Yes ✓ No LOGO Hidden unless: Question "Do you have children under the age of 18 in your household?" #7 is one of the following answers ("Yes") 8. How interested would the children in your household be to use the new YMCA facility? ✓ Interested • Neutral C Not Interested LOGIC Hidden unless: Question "How interested would the children in your household be to use the new YMCA facility?" #8 is one of the following answers ("Interested","Neutral") 9. What YMCA activities would be of most interest to your children? Please check all that apply. Only put in one activity per other response, if applicable. E Open Swim Time I— Swim Lessons T Youth Sports Program I Open Gym • Meet Friends • Other (please specify) • Other (please specify) Location and Membership Type We would now like to ask you the convenience of two possible locations for the Community Center. 10. One suggested location is in Downtown Tigard, on the trail system. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being most convenient and 1 being very inconvenient, how convenient is this location for you? • 1 - Very Inconvenient C 2 - Inconvenient C 3 - Neutral C 4 - Convenient ✓ 5 - Very Convenient C Unfamiliar with location 11 . Another suggestion is the 99 Corridor near Bull Mountain.. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being most convenient and 1 being very inconvenient, how convenient is this location for you? • 1 - Very Inconvenient C 2 - Inconvenient C 3 - Neutral C 4 - Convenient C 5 - Very Convenient • Unfamiliar with location 12. Did you vote in the last Presidential election? Do not present the "refuse to answer" option. It's only there because the question is required, and someone might not want to answer. • Yes ✓ No ✓ Refused to answer 13. Do you own your home or do you rent? Again, the refused to answer option is only there just in case someone doesn't want to answer. ✓ Own ✓ Rent ✓ Refused to answer Lc Hidden unless: Question "Do you own your home or do you rent?" #13 is one of the following answers ("Own") 14. The YMCA and the City of Tigard are considering a collaboration to build a new community center owned by the city. The building would be over 60,000 square feet, deliver a full array of programming and activities, and would require voters to consider a property tax increase of about$10 per month for the average homeowner. What is your willingness to pay this amount to build a center? ✓ Support • Oppose ✓ Not Sure Need More Information 15. If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family? ✓ Teen/Young Adult (ages 13-25) • Adult (ages 26-64) ✓ Family Membership: 2 Adults ✓ Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child ✓ Family Membership: 2 Adults with child(ren) ✓ Senior (65+) ✓ Youth (under 13) ✓ No Interest in any health/recreation center Pricing Page entry logic: This page will show when: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Teen/Young Adult (ages 13-25)","Adult (ages 26-64)","Family Membership: 2 Adults","Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child","Family Membership: 2 Adults with child(ren)","Senior (65+)","Youth (under 13)") i.ococ Hidden unless: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Teen/Young Adult (ages 13-25)") 16. Teen/Young Adult (ages 13-25) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out"5" for the remainder of the prices. 1 - No Interest 2 - Little Interest 3 - Not Sure 4 - Some Interest 5 - A Lot of Interest $25.00 $23.50 $21.00 r C C C C $20.00 $19.00 ioGe- Hidden unless: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Adult (ages 26-64)") 17. 1 Adult (26-64) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices. 1 - No Interest 2 - Little Interest 3 - Not Sure 4 - Some Interest 5 - A Lot of Interest $41.00 41 C r c c r i $39.00 r r r r r $37.00 r c r r r $33.00 r r r r r $30.00 r C r r r uc Hidden unless: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Family Membership: 2 Adults") 18. Family Membership: 2 Adults The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices. 1 - No Interest 2 - Little Interest 3 - Not Sure 4 - Some Interest 5 - A Lot of Interest $51.00 $49.00 $47.00 $44.50 $42.00 Hidden unless: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child") 19. Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out"5" for the remainder of the prices. 1 - No Interest 2 - Little Interest 3 - Not Sure 4 - Some Interest 5 - A Lot of Interest $52.00 C C C C C $49.50 C C r c r $47.00 C r r C r $44.50 r C r r r $42.00 C C r c r Lock Hidden unless: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Family Membership: 2 Adults with child(ren)") 20. Family Membership: 2 Adults with children) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices. 1 - No Interest 2 - Little Interest 3 - Not Sure 4 - Some Interest 5 - A Lot of Interest $62.00 $59.00 C C C C C $56.00 $53.00 $50.00 dock Hidden unless: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Senior (65+)") 21 . Senior (65+) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices. 1 - No Interest 2 - Little Interest 3 - Not Sure 4 - Some Interest 5 - A Lot of Interest $37.50 r r r r r $35.50 r r C r r $34.00 r r C r r $32.00 r r C r r $29.00 r r C r r LOGIC Hidden unless: Question "If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family?" #15 is one of the following answers ("Youth (under 13)") 22. Youth (under 13) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices. 1 - No Interest 2 - Little Interest 3 - Not Sure 4 - Some Interest 5 - A Lot of Interest $21 .00 r r r r r $19.50 r r r C r $18.00 r r r r r $16.50 r r r r r $15.00 r r r r r Demographics 23. What is your age range? ✓ Teens ✓ 20s ✓ 30s ✓ 40s ✓ 50s ✓ 60s ✓ 70+ 24. How many children under 18 do you have living at home? ✓ 0 ✓ 1 ✓ 2 ✓ 3 ✓ 4+ 25. Last year, in which category was your family's income? Do not present refusal option,just choose it if the person refused to answer the question as asked. ✓ Up to $35,000 ✓ $35,001 to $50,000 r $50,001 to $100,000 ✓ Over$100,000 ✓ Refused to answer i.c c Hidden unless: Question "The YMCA and the City of Tigard are considering a collaboration to build a new community center owned by the city. The building would be over 60,000 square feet, deliver a full array of programming and activities, and would require voters to consider a property tax increase of about$10 per month for the average homeowner. What is your willingness to pay this amount to build a center?" #14 is one of the following answers ("Need More Information") 26. You indicated that you would need more information about the property tax increase to build the community center. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information? If respondent does not want to be contacted, leave fields blank. If they do, please fill in name and phone number and/or e-mail address (both phone and e-mail are not required, use whichever the respondent gives you). Name Phone Number E-Mail Address 27. Do not ask: What is the respondent's gender? * r Male r Female 28. Interviewer Only: * Interviewer Name: Phone# Dialed: Address: 5 Digit Zip: Thank You! Thank you for taking our survey. Your response is very important to us. daxko Market Profile Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR (4173650) Place Tigard city,OR... Population Summary 2000 Total Population 43,118 2010 Total Population 48,035 2014 Total Population 49,324 2014 Group Quarters 331 2019 Total Population 51,969 2014-2019 Annual Rate 1.05% Household Summary 2000 Households 17,108 2000 Average Household Size 2.51 2010 Households 19,157 2010 Average Household Size 2.49 2014 Households 19,630 2014 Average Household Size 2.50 2019 Households 20,662 2019 Average Household Size 2.50 2014-2019 Annual Rate 1.03% 2010 Families 12,470 2010 Average Family Size 3.04 2014 Families 12,698 2014 Average Family Size 3.05 2019 Families 13,303 2019 Average Family Size 3.06 2014-2019 Annual Rate 0.94% Housing Unit Summary 2000 Housing Units 17,985 Owner Occupied Housing Units 57.2% Renter Occupied Housing Units 37.9% Vacant Housing Units 4.90/0 2010 Housing Units 20,068 Owner Occupied Housing Units 57.7% Renter Occupied Housing Units 37.7% Vacant Housing Units 4.5% 2014 Housing Units 20,580 Owner Occupied Housing Units 56.2% Renter Occupied Housing Units 39.2% Vacant Housing Units 4.6% 2019 Housing Units 21,685 Owner Occupied Housing Units 56.1% Renter Occupied Housing Units 39.2% Vacant Housing Units 4.7% Median Household Income 2014 $65,976 2019 $83,274 Median Home Value 2014 $302,733 2019 $363,770 Per Capita Income 2014 $34,013 2019 $39,778 Median Age 2010 37.3 2014 37.9 2019 38.0 Data Note:Household population includes persons not residing in group quarters. Average Household Size is the household population divided by total households. Persons in families include the householder and persons related to the householder by birth,marriage,or adoption. Per Capita Income represents the income received by all persons aged 15 years and over divided by the total population. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1.Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019.Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. May 05, 2015 daxko Market Profile Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR(4173650) Place Tigard city,OR... 2014 Households by Income Household Income Base 19,630 <$15,000 10.1% $15,000- $24,999 9.7% $25,000- $34,999 8.0% $35,000- $49,999 10.7% $50,000- $74,999 16.0% $75,000- $99,999 12.0% $100,000-$149,999 20.7% $150,000- $199,999 7.6% $200,000+ 5.1% Average Household Income $85,103 2019 Households by Income Household Income Base 20,663 <$15,000 8.7% $15,000- $24,999 6.6% $25,000- $34,999 6.2% $35,000- $49,999 8.9% $50,000- $74,999 13.7% $75,000- $99,999 14.8% $100,000- $149,999 23.2% $150,000- $199,999 11.1% $200,000+ 6.8% Average Household Income $99,596 2014 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total 11,570 <$50,000 0.3% $50,000- $99,999 0.9% $100,000- $149,999 2.2% $150,000- $199,999 4.8% $200,000- $249,999 15.4% $250,000- $299,999 25.6% $300,000- $399,999 30.7% $400,000- $499,999 11.7% $500,000- $749,999 6.9% $750,000- $999,999 0.6% $1,000,000 + 1.0% Average Home Value $337,414 2019 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total 12,172 <$50,000 0.1% $50,000-$99,999 0.6% $100,000- $149,999 0.5% $150,000- $199,999 1.5% $200,000- $249,999 7.4% $250,000- $299,999 15.2% $300,000- $399,999 38.7% $400,000- $499,999 20.7% $500,000- $749,999 11.6% $750,000- $999,999 2.7% $1,000,000 + 1.0% Average Home Value $399,248 Data Note:Income represents the preceding year,expressed in current dollars. Household income includes wage and salary earnings,interest dividends,net rents, pensions,SSI and welfare payments,child support,and alimony. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019. Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. May 05, 2015 daxko Market Profile Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR(4173650) Place Tigard city,OR... 2010 Population by Age Total 48,035 0-4 6.8% 5-9 6.6% 10- 14 6.6% 15- 24 12.2% 25- 34 14.6% 35 -44 14.6% 45- 54 15.2% 55- 64 12.2% 65- 74 5.9% 75 -84 3.6% 85 + 1.9% 18+ 75.9% 2014 Population by Age Total 49,320 0-4 6.4% 5-9 6.5% 10- 14 6.4% 15- 24 12.7% 25- 34 14.0% 35-44 13.9% 45- 54 14.1% 55-64 13.1% 65- 74 7.4% 75- 84 3.5% 85 + 1.9% 18+ 76.8% 2019 Population by Age Total 51,969 0-4 6.5% 5-9 6.4% 10- 14 6.4% 15- 24 11.6% 25- 34 14.8% 35-44 13.8% 45- 54 12.9% 55- 64 12.8% 65- 74 9.0% 75- 84 3.9% 85 + 1.9% 18 + 77.0% 2010 Population by Sex Males 23,517 Females 24,518 2014 Population by Sex Males 24,165 Females 25,155 2019 Population by Sex Males 25,430 Females 26,539 Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1.Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019.Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. May 05, 2015 daxko Market Profile Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR(4173650) Place Tigard city,OR... 2010 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 48,035 White Alone 79.6% Black Alone 1.8% American Indian Alone 0.7% Asian Alone 7.2% Pacific Islander Alone 0.9% Some Other Race Alone 5.9% Two or More Races 4.0% Hispanic Origin 12.7% Diversity Index 50.2 2014 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 49,324 White Alone 78.1% Black Alone 1.9% American Indian Alone 0.7% Asian Alone 7.6% Pacific Islander Alone 1.0% Some Other Race Alone 6.5% Two or More Races 4.3% Hispanic Origin 13.8% Diversity Index 53.1 2019 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 51,969 White Alone 75.6% Black Alone 2.2% American Indian Alone 0.8% Asian Alone 8.6% Pacific Islander Alone 1.1% Some Other Race Alone 7.1% Two or More Races 4.7% Hispanic Origin 15.4% Diversity Index 57.2 2010 Population by Relationship and Household Type Total 48,035 In Households 99.3% In Family Households 81.3% Householder 26.0% Spouse 20.1% Child 29.3% Other relative 3.5% Nonrelative 2.5% In Nonfamily Households 18.0% In Group Quarters 0.7% Institutionalized Population 0.2% Noninstitutionalized Population 0.5% Data Note:Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race. The Diversity Index measures the probability that two people from the same area will be from different race/ ethnic groups. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1.Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019.Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. May 05, 2015 daxko Market Profile Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR (4173650) Place Tigard city,OR... 2014 Population 25+ by Educational Attainment Total 33,541 Less than 9th Grade 3.3% 9th- 12th Grade, No Diploma 4.4% High School Graduate 15.1% GED/Alternative Credential 3.2% Some College, No Degree 25.4% Associate Degree 8.9% Bachelor's Degree 26.9% Graduate/Professional Degree 12.9% 2014 Population 15+by Marital Status Total 39,788 Never Married 28.7% Married 53.1% Widowed 4.8% Divorced 13.5% 2014 Civilian Population 16+in Labor Force Civilian Employed 92.3% Civilian Unemployed 7.7% 2014 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Total 24,584 Agriculture/Mining 0.5% Construction 4.8% Manufacturing 15.3% Wholesale Trade 3.0% Retail Trade 10.6% Transportation/Utilities 3.7% Information 1.5% Finance/Insurance/Real Estate 8.7% Services 49.0% Public Administration 2.9% 2014 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total 24,584 White Collar 67.8% Management/Business/Financial 19.6% Professional 21.4% Sales 11.4% Administrative Support 15.5% Services 17.3% Blue Collar 14.8% Farming/Forestry/Fishing 0.1% Construction/Extraction 2.9% Installation/Maintenance/Repair 2.7% Production 6.0% Transportation/Material Moving 3.1% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1.Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019.Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. May 05, 2015 g ., daxko Market Profile Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR(4173650) Place Tigard city,OR... 2010 Households by Type Total 19,157 Households with 1 Person 26.9% Households with 2+ People 73.1% Family Households 65.1% Husband-wife Families 50.4% With Related Children 23.5% Other Family (No Spouse Present) 14.7% Other Family with Male Householder 4.6% With Related Children 2.8% Other Family with Female Householder 10.0% With Related Children 6.7% Nonfamily Households 8.0% All Households with Children 33.3% Multigenerational Households 2.5% Unmarried Partner Households 7.1% Male-female 6.3% Same-sex 0.9% 2010 Households by Size Total 19,157 1 Person Household 26.9% 2 Person Household 34.0% 3 Person Household 16.4% 4 Person Household 13.9% 5 Person Household 5.5% 6 Person Household 2.1% 7 + Person Household 1.2% 2010 Households by Tenure and Mortgage Status Total 19,157 Owner Occupied 60.5% Owned with a Mortgage/Loan 49.1% Owned Free and Clear 11.3% Renter Occupied 39.5% Data Note:Households with children include any households with people under age 18,related or not. Multigenerational households are families with 3 or more parent-child relationships.Unmarried partner households are usually classified as nonfamily households unless there is another member of the household related to the householder. Multigenerational and unmarried partner households are reported only to the tract level.Esri estimated block group data,which is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1.Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019.Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. May 05, 2015 � daxko Market Profile Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR (4173650) Place Tigard city,OR... Top 3 Tapestry Segments 1. Bright Young Professionals 2. Soccer Moms(4A) 3. Enterprising Professionals 2014 Consumer Spending Apparel&Services: Total $ $35,392,872 Average Spent $1,803.00 Spending Potential Index 80 Computers&Accessories: Total$ $6,091,217 Average Spent $310.30 Spending Potential Index 122 Education: Total $ $35,641,231 Average Spent $1,815.65 Spending Potential Index 122 Entertainment/Recreation: Total $ $75,456,976 Average Spent $3,843.96 Spending Potential Index 119 Food at Home: Total $ $116,002,272 Average Spent $5,909.44 Spending Potential Index 116 Food Away from Home: Total $ $75,682,156 Average Spent $3,855.43 Spending Potential Index 120 Health Care: Total $ $102,470,748 Average Spent $5,220.11 Spending Potential Index 113 HH Furnishings&Equipment: Total$ $37,363,109 Average Spent $1,903.37 Spending Potential Index 106 Investments: Total $ $59,116,007 Average Spent $3,011.51 Spending Potential Index 112 Retail Goods: Total $ $542,667,030 Average Spent $27,644.78 Spending Potential Index 111 Shelter: Total $ $382,032,347 Average Spent $19,461.66 Spending Potential Index 121 N/Video/Audio: Total $ $28,947,015 Average Spent $1,474.63 Spending Potential Index 116 Travel: Total $ $45,243,371 Average Spent $2,304.81 Spending Potential Index 121 Vehicle Maintenance&Repairs:Total$ $25,264,460 Average Spent $1,287.03 Spending Potential Index 118 Data Note:Consumer spending shows the amount spent on a variety of goods and services by households that reside in the area. Expenditures are shown by broad budget categories that are not mutually exclusive. Consumer spending does not equal business revenue.Total and Average Amount Spent Per Household represent annual figures.The Spending Potential Index represents the amount spent in the area relative to a national average of 100. Source:Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2011 and 2012 Consumer Expenditure Surveys,Bureau of Labor Statistics.Esri. Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2014 and 2019.Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. May 05, 2015 daxko Tapestry Segmentation Area Profile (2014) Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR(4173650) Place Top Twenty Tapestry Segments 2014 Households 2014 U.S. Households Cumulative Cumulative Rank Tapestry Segment Percent Percent Percent Percent Index 1 Bright Young Professionals(8C) 15.3% 15.3% 2.2% 2.2% 695 2 Soccer Moms(4A) 14.7% 30.0% 2.8% 5.0% 521 3 Enterprising Professionals(2D) 10.3% 40.3% 1.4% 6.4% 748 4 Emerald City(8B) 9.8% 50.1% 1.4% 7.8% 696 5 Metro Fusion (11C) 8.7% 58.8% 1.4% 9.2% 626 Subtotal 58.8% 9.2% 6 In Style (5B) 7.8% 66.6% 2.3% 11.5% 347 7 Savvy Suburbanites (1D) 7.7% 74.3% 3.0% 14.5% 259 8 The Elders(9C) 4.8% 79.1% 0.7% 15.2% 650 9 Golden Years(9B) 3.9% 83.0% 1.3% 16.5% 291 10 Home Improvement(4B) 3.7% 86.7% 1.7% 18.2% 216 Subtotal 27.9% 9.0% 11 Boomburbs(1C) 3.6% 90.3% 1.5% 19.7% 247 12 Professional Pride(1B) 3.3% 93.6% 1.6% 21.3% 205 13 Pleasantville (2B) 2.9% 96.5% 2.2% 23.5% 131 14 Set to Impress(11D) 2.2% 98.7% 1.4% 24.9% 156 15 Young and Restless(11B) 1.3% 100.0% 1.7% 26.6% 77 Subtotal 13.3% 8.4% Total 100.0% 26.6% 376 Top Ten Tapestry Segments Site vs. U.S. Home Improvement (4B)-■•■•• Golden Years (9B) The Elders (9C)- Savvy Suburbanites (1D) In Style (5B)- Metro Fusion (11C) Emerald City (8B) Enterprising Professionals (2D) • Site Soccer Moms (4A)- • U.S. Bright Young Professionals (8C) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Percent of Households by Tapestry Segment Data Note:This report identifies neighborhood segments in the area,and describes the socioeconomic quality of the immediate neighborhood. The index is a comparison of the percent of households or population in the area,by Tapestry segment,to the percent of households or population in the United States,by segment. An index of 100 is the US average. Source:Esri May 05, 2015 daxko Tapestry Segmentation Area Profile (2014) Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR(4173650) Place 2014 Tapestry Indexes by Households 2014 Tapestry Indexes by Population Index Index 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 14C- 14C- 14A- 14A- 13D- 13D- 13B- 13B- 12D- 12D- 12B- 12B- 11E- 11E- 11C 11C-4 11A- 11A- 10D- 10D- 10B- 10B- 9F- 9F- 90- 9D- 9B- 9B- 4 8G- .4 8G- c c 8E- E 8E- o) rn in 8C to 8C- T > v 8A- v 8A- w v it• 7E- a 7E- H H 7C- 7C- 7A- 7A- 6E- 6E- 6C- 6C- 6A- 6A- 5D- 5D- 5B- - 5B-4 4C- 4C- 4A- 4A- 38- 3B- 2D- 2D-4 2B-∎ 2B-01.■.. 1E- 1E- 1C- 1C- Dat Tote:This report identifies neighborhood segments in the area,and describes the soc{AcSnomic quality of the immediate neighborhood. The index Is a comparison of the percent of households or population in the area,by Tapestry segment,to the percent of households or population in the United States,by segment. An index of 100 is the US average. Source:Esri May 05, 2015 ,, daxko Tapestry Segmentation Area Profile (2014) Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR (4173650) Place Tapestry LifeMode Groups 2014 Households 2014 Population Number Percent Index Number Percent Index Total: 19,630 100.0% 49,324 100.0% 1.Affluent Estates 2,867 14.6% 150 8,228 16.7% 157 Top Tier(1A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Professional Pride (1B) 639 3.3% 205 1,918 3.9% 207 Boomburbs(1C) 712 3.6% 247 2,189 4.4% 246 Savvy Suburbanites(1D) 1,516 7.7% 259 4,121 8.4% 260 Exurbanites(1E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 2. Upscale Avenues 2,594 13.2% 233 6,879 13.9% 239 Urban Chic (2A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Pleasantville(2B) 575 2.9% 131 1,564 3.2% 129 Pacific Heights (2C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Enterprising Professionals(2D) 2,019 10.3% 748 5,315 10.8% 834 3.Uptown Individuals 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Laptops and Lattes (3A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Metro Renters (3B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Trendsetters(3C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 4.Family Landscapes 3,611 18.4% 251 9,951 20.2% 254 Soccer Moms(4A) 2,879 14.7% 521 7,928 16.1% 509 Home Improvement(4B) 732 3.7% 216 2,023 4.1% 219 Middleburg (4C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 5.GenXurban 1,533 7.8% 68 3,740 7.6% 71 Comfortable Empty Nesters(5A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 In Style(5B) 1,533 7.8% 347 3,740 7.6% 374 Parks and Rec(5C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Rustbelt Traditions(5D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Midlife Constants(5E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 6.Cozy Country Living 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Green Acres(6A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Salt of the Earth (6B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 The Great Outdoors(6C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Prairie Living (6D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Rural Resort Dwellers(6E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Heartland Communities(6F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 7.Ethnic Enclaves 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Up and Coming Families(7A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Urban Villages (7B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 American Dreamers(7C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Barrios Urbanos(7D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Valley Growers (7E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Southwestern Families (7F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Data Note:This report identifies neighborhood segments in the area,and describes the socioeconomic quality of the immediate neighborhood. The index is a comparison of the percent of households or population in the area,by Tapestry segment,to the percent of households or population in the United States,by segment. An index of 100 is the US average. Source:Esri May 05, 2015 _ ., -' daxko Tapestry Segmentation Area Profile (2014) Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR (4173650) Place Tapestry LifeMode Groups 2014 Households 2014 Population Number Percent Index Number Percent Index Total: 19,630 100.0% 49,324 100.0% 8.Middle Ground 4,927 25.1% 230 11,344 23.0% 228 City Lights(8A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Emerald City(8B) 1,927 9.8% 696 4,233 8.6% 768 Bright Young Professionals(8C) 3,000 15.3% 695 7,111 14.4% 717 Downtown Melting Pot(8D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Front Porches (8E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Old and Newcomers(8F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Hardscrabble Road (8G) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 9.Senior Styles 1,701 8.7% 151 3,160 6.4% 145 Silver&Gold (9A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Golden Years(9B) 767 3.9% 291 1,735 3.5% 325 The Elders(9C) 934 4.8% 650 1,425 2.9% 610 Senior Escapes(9D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Retirement Communities(9E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Social Security Set(9F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 10. Rustic Outposts 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Southern Satellites(10A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Rooted Rural (10B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Diners&Miners(10C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Down the Road (10D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Rural Bypasses(10E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 11. Midtown Singles 2,397 12.2% 198 6,022 12.2% 216 City Strivers(11A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Young and Restless(11B) 255 1.3% 77 561 1.1% 87 Metro Fusion(11C) 1,717 8.7% 626 4,548 9.2% 655 Set to Impress(11D) 425 2.2% 156 913 1.9% 160 City Commons(11E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 12. Hometown 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Family Foundations (12A) 0 0.096 0 0 0.0% 0 Traditional Living (12B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Small Town Simplicity(12C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Modest Income Homes(12D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 13. Next Wave 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 International Marketplace (13A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Las Casas(13B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 NeWest Residents(13C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Fresh Ambitions(13D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 High Rise Renters(13E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 14.Scholars and Patriots 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Military Proximity(14A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 College Towns(14B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Dorms to Diplomas(14C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Unclassified (15) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Data Note:This report identifies neighborhood segments in the area,and describes the socioeconomic quality of the immediate neighborhood. The index is a comparison of the percent of households or population in the area,by Tapestry segment,to the percent of households or population in the United States,by segment. An index of 100 is the US average. Source:Esri May 05, 2015 i -■ daxko Tapestry Segmentation Area Profile (2014) Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR(4173650) Place Tapestry Urbanization Groups 2014 Households 2014 Population Number Percent Index Number Percent Index Total: 19,630 100.0% 49,324 100.0% 1. Principal Urban Center 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Laptops and Lattes (3A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Metro Renters (3B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Trendsetters(3C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Downtown Melting Pot(8D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 City Strivers(11A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 NeWest Residents(13C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Fresh Ambitions(13D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 High Rise Renters(13E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 2. Urban Periphery 4,717 24.0% 142 11,659 23.6% 126 Pacific Heights(2C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Rustbelt Traditions(5D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Urban Villages(7B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 American Dreamers(7C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Barrios Urbanos(7D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Southwestern Families(7F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 City Lights (8A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Bright Young Professionals(8C) 3,000 15.3% 695 7,111 14.4% 717 Metro Fusion(11C) 1,717 8.7% 626 4,548 9.2% 655 Family Foundations (12A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Modest Income Homes (12D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 International Marketplace(13A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Las Casas(13B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 3. Metro Cities 4,140 21.1% 116 9,447 19.2% 117 In Style(5B) 1,533 7.8% 347 3,740 7.6% 374 Emerald City(8B) 1,927 9.8% 696 4,233 8.6% 768 Front Porches(8E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Old and Newcomers(8F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Hardscrabble Road (8G) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Retirement Communities(9E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Social Security Set(9F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Young and Restless (11B) 255 1.3% 77 561 1.1% 87 Set to Impress (11D) 425 2.2% 156 913 1.9% 160 City Commons(11E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Traditional Living (12B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 College Towns(14B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Dorms to Diplomas(14C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Data Note:This report identifies neighborhood segments in the area,and describes the socioeconomic quality of the immediate neighborhood. The index is a comparison of the percent of households or population in the area,by Tapestry segment,to the percent of households or population in the United States,by segment. An index of 100 is the US average. Source:Esri May 05, 2015 daxko '� Tapestry Segmentation Area Profile (2014) Tigard City, OR Tigard city, OR (4173650) Place Tapestry Urbanization Groups 2014 Households 2014 Population Number Percent Index Number Percent Index Total: 19,630 100.0% 49,324 100.0% 4.Suburban Periphery 10,773 54.9% 175 28,218 57.2% 177 Top Tier(1A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Professional Pride (1B) 639 3.3% 205 1,918 3.9% 207 Boomburbs(1C) 712 3.6% 247 2,189 4.4% 246 Savvy Suburbanites (1D) 1,516 7.7% 259 4,121 8.4% 260 Exurbanites(1E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Urban Chic(2A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Pleasantville(2B) 575 2.9% 131 1,564 3.2% 129 Enterprising Professionals(2D) 2,019 10.3% 748 5,315 10.8% 834 Soccer Moms(4A) 2,879 14.7% 521 7,928 16.1% 509 Home Improvement(4B) 732 3.7% 216 2,023 4.1% 219 Comfortable Empty Nesters (5A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Parks and Rec(5C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Midlife Constants (5E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Up and Coming Families(7A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Silver&Gold (9A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Golden Years(9B) 767 3.9% 291 1,735 3.5% 325 The Elders(9C) 934 4.8% 650 1,425 2.9% 610 Military Proximity (14A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 5.Semirural 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Middleburg (4C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Heartland Communities(6F) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Valley Growers(7E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Senior Escapes(9D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Down the Road (l0D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Small Town Simplicity(12C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 6. Rural 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Green Acres(6A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Salt of the Earth (6B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 The Great Outdoors(6C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Prairie Living (6D) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Rural Resort Dwellers(6E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Southern Satellites(10A) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Rooted Rural (10B) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Diners&Miners(10C) 0 0.0% 0 0 0% 0 Rural Bypasses (10E) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Unclassified(15) 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 Data Note:This report identifies neighborhood segments in the area,and describes the socioeconomic quality of the immediate neighborhood. The index is a comparison of the percent of households or population in the area,by Tapestry segment,to the percent of households or population in the United States,by segment. An index of 100 is the US average. Source:Esri May 05, 2015 Filtered Report: Y Members + Former Members 1. Are you or any child in your household a member of the YMCA or have you been a member in the past? Yes 39.7% Former Member 60.3% No 0.0% 0 Yes 39.7% 48 Former Member 60.3% 73 Total 121 1 2. Where are/were you a member? Griffith Park Family YMCA 5% Sherwood Regional Family YMCA 37.2% Other(please specify)57.9% Griffith Park Family YMCA 5.0% ' 6 Sherwood Regional Family YMCA 37.2% 45 Other(please specify) 57.9% 70 Total 121 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 52 Ashland Or 1 Astoria 1 Barber Blvd 1 Beaverton 1 Beaverton Oregon 1 Beaverton YMCA 3 Beaverton district 1 Beverton 1 Boise, Idaho 1 Buffalo, NY 1 Calif ronia 1 Can't remember the Jolly Green Giant by Dunaway Park. 1 Cedar Falls Iowa 1 Denver,CO 1 2 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Different State 1 Downtown Portland 2 East Bay 1 Eugene,Oregon 2 Georgia 1 Grand Prairie,TX 1 High Y in Portland 1 Hillsboro 1 Hollywood YMCA 1 I don't remember 1 In Idaho and CA 1 In NewJersey 1 Iowa 1 Kalamath Falls 1 Longview Wa 1 Marshalltown IA 1 Metro YMCA 1 N.E. Portland 1 North East YMCA years ago. 1 Northeast Portland 1 Ohio 1 Out of state 2 Pa 1 Pennsylvania 1 Phoenix,AZ 1 Portland 1 Portland on Barbour 1 Quincy, IL 1 Rose City 1 Salem Or 2 San Francisco 1 3 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Sanfernando CA 1 South East Portland Holgate? 1 South West Portland 1 Southern California 1 Tacoma Y 1 Tillamook County Family Y 1 Tocam a 1 Washington State 2 Y east 1 bay area calif 1 downtown 1 downtown portland 1 metro area 1 missouri 1 out of town 1 portland 1 winnipeg 1 4 3. How often do you exercise per week? -\I don't exercise on a regular basis 14.9% Onceaweek4.1% • 2 times a week 13.2% 3 or more times a week 67.8% Statistics 3 or more times a week 67.8% 82 Sum 278.0 2 times a week 13.2% , 16 Average 2.8 Once a week 4.1% ' 5 StdDev 0.4 I don't exercise on a regular basis 14.9% III 18 Max 3.0 Total 121 5 4. Where do you exercise most often? Other(please specify)11.7% YMCA(which one?)18.5% At home 42.7% Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym(which one?)27.2% At home 42.7% 44 Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym (which one?) 27.2% ■ 28 YMCA(which one?) 18.5% . 19 Other(please specify) 11.7% 12 Total 103 Responses"Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym(which one?)" Count Left Blank 95 24 Hour Fitness 1 24 Hour fitness 1 24 hr 2 Bally's 1 Beaverton THRPD 1 Boom fitness 1 Club Sport 2 Club Sports 1 Crunch 1 Curves 1 Harmon pool 1 Home Gym 1 LA Fitness 2 6 Responses"Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym(which one?)" Count LA fitness 1 Planet Fitness 1 Planet fitness 2 Providence Fitness Center/24 Hour Fitness 1 The Crunch 1 club sports 1 crunch fitness 1 curves 1 planet fitness 1 Responses"YMCA(which one?)" Count Left Blank 103 Sherwood 6 Sherwood 1 Sherwood Regional 1 Sherwood Regional Y 1 Sherwood Y 2 Sherwood YMCA 5 The Hoop at Griffith 1 sherwood 1 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 109 24 hour fitness 2 Ball room for Dance Classes 1 Clubhouse in my neighborhood 1 Private Fitness Group 1 Residence gym 1 Sherwood Memorial Colliseum 1 Yoga Classes 1 a PE teacher 1 curves 1 in the community 1 7 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count walking commuity 1 8 5. I'm going to read a list of YMCA facilities. Please tell me whether you or someone in your household would use following never, sometimes or often. Never Sometimes Often Responses Cardiovascular Equipment like treadmills,bikes or elliptical 24 33 64 121 19.8% 27.3% 52.9% Free weights or machine weights for strength training 28 45 48 121 23.1% 37.2% 39.7% Open gym time 70 29 20 119 58.8% 24.4% 16.8% Group exercise classes such as: Body Sculpt,Zumba, Step Aerobics,TRX 39 43 36 118 33.1% 36.4% 30.5% Classes for youth such as art, music,dance,theater 105 9 6 120 87.5% 7.5% 5.0% Family Exercise classes and games like kickball,family Olympics and family Zumba, 98 14 7 119 family Yoga 82.4%1 11.8% 5.9% Spinning/Group Cycling 74 30 16 120 61.7% 25.0% 13.3% Starter fitness programs 53 40 27 120 44.2% 33.3% 22.5% Yoga and Pilates 44 42 34 120 36.7% 35.0% 28.3% Pool 27 26 68 121 22.3% 21.5% 56.2% Child Watch(while parents work out) 5 3 119 4.2% 2.5% Personal Training 64 43 12 119 53.8% 36.1% 10.1% Specific classes for teens/teen programming 10 3 117 8.5% 2.6% 9 6. What other facilities, equipment or programs would be important to you and your household? Count Response 1 A heated pool 1 A warm water pool that is handicap accessible with daytime swim activities. 1 Aquatic exercise classes 1 Arthritic Pool. 1 Basketball league play for five family members 1 Children's sports leagues 1 Classes for senior adults 1 Classes for youth. 1 Classes that start out slow then build up. 1 I like water aerobics 1 I mostly would do Group EX Classes 1 I would like a sauna or a steam room. 1 Indoor/outdoor running track 1 Kick Boxiing class 1 Music programs 1 None personal 1 None at this time. 1 Not at this time.Also we are on silver sneakers so we do not pay anything. 4 Nothing 1 Privacy in the locker room. 1 Racquet ball 1 Racquetball Courts 1 Reasonable price for membership 1 Rock climbing wall 1 Salt water pool 3 Sauna 1 Senior aerobic classes 1 Swimming Pool 1 Swimming laps 1 Tai chi classes,warm water exercise pool 10 Count Response 1 Tennis courts 1 Tennis courts, Indoor basketball courts, racquetball,rock climbing and a party room. 1 The Silver Sneakers 1 Warm water therapy pool,jacuzzi,sauna,and steam room 1 Water aerobics,jacuzzi 1 Water aerobics,sauna 1 Youth Oriented Programs. 1 climbing wall 1 lots of dance classes different kinds 1 meditation and adult art classes 1 no chlorine pool salt water is needed spa like sauna and hot tub massage therapy 1 racquetball 1 sauna and steam room 1 water aerobics 1 water aerobics;a special class for Arthritis aerobics; Programs for Seniors. 1 would like late hours he is a night owl 1 I would indoor or outdoor tennis courts. I am on silver sneakers so I do not have to pay anything to use the Y. 11 7. Do you have children under the age of 18 in your household? Yes 14.9% No 85.1% Yes 14.9% . 18 No 85.1% 103 Total 121 12 8. How interested would the children in your household be to use the new YMCA facility? Not Interested 16.7% Neutral 16.7% Interested 66.7% Interested 66.7% 12 Neutral 16.7% . 3 Not Interested 16.7% . 3 Total 18 13 9. What YMCA activities would be of most interest to your children? Please check all that apply. 100 93.3% 80% 80 73.3% 60 53.3% 46.7% 40% 40 20 0 Open Swim Time Swim Lessons Youth Sports Program Open Gym Meet Friends Other(please specify) Open Swim Time 93.3% 14 Swim Lessons 46.7% 7 Youth Sports Program 80.0% 12 Open Gym 73.3% NMI 11 Meet Friends 53.3% 8 Other(please specify) 40.0% 6 Total 15 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 115 Baby Sitting or cpr classes 1 Dances 1 Fencing lessons 1 Good program for basketball 1 kids fitness 1 weight machines 1 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 119 Racquetball and indoor track 1 non competitive swim team 1 14 10. One suggested location is in Downtown Tigard, on the trail system. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being most convenient and 1 being very inconvenient, how convenient is this location for you? Unfamiliar with location 3.3% 1 1-Very Incon2 venient 0.8%-Inconvenient 3.3% 3-Neutral 11.6% 5-Very Convenient 47.9% 4-Convenient 33.1% Statistics 1 Very Inconvenient 0.8% ( 1 Sum 501.0 2 Inconvenient 3.3% I 4 Average 4.3 3 Neutral 11.6% , 14 StdDev 0.9 4-Convenient 33.1% 40 Max 5.0 5-Very Convenient 47.9% 58 Unfamiliar with location 3.3% I 4 Total 121 15 11. Another suggestion is the 99 Corridor near Bull Mountain.. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being most convenient and 1 being very inconvenient, how convenient is this location for you? Unfamiliar with location 2.5%1 1-Very Inconvenient 11.6% 2-Inconvenient 11.6% 5-Very Convenient 43% 3-Neutral 11.6% 4-Convenient 19.8% Statistics 1 -Very Inconvenient 11.6% , 14 Sum 440.0 2 Inconvenient 11.6% , 14 Average 3.7 3-Neutral 11.6% , 14 StdDev 1.4 4-Convenient 19.8% ■ 24 Max 5.0 5-Very Convenient 43.0% 52 Unfamiliar with location 2.5% I 3 Total 121 16 12. Did you vote in the last Presidential election? No 2.5% Yes 97.5% Yes 97.5% 118 No 2.5% I 3 Refused to answer 0.0% 0 Total 121 17 13. Do you own your home or do you rent? Rent 6.6% Own 93.4% Own 93.4% 113 Rent 6.6% ' 8 Refused to answer 0.0% 0 Total 121 18 14. The YMCA and the City of Tigard are considering a collaboration to build a new community center owned by the city. The building would be over 60,000 square feet, deliver a full array of programming and activities, and would require voters to consider a property tax increase of about $10 per month for the average homeowner. What is your willingness to pay this amount to build a center? Need More Information 24.8% Support 41.6% Not Sure 18.6% Oppose 15% Support 41.6% 47 Oppose 15.0% . 17 Not Sure 18.6% . 21 Need More Information 24.8% 28 Total 113 19 15. If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family? No Interest in any health/recreation center 7.4% Adult(ages 26-64)14.9% Family Membership:2 Adults 19% Senior(65+)45.5% Family Membership:2 Adults with child(ren)13.2% Teen/Young Adult(ages 13-25) 0.0% 0 Adult(ages 26-64) 14.9% . 18 Family Membership:2 Adults 19.0% ■ 23 Family Membership:Adult plus 1 child 0.0% 0 Family Membership:2 Adults with child(ren) 13.2% , 16 Senior(65+) 45.5% 11111 55 Youth(under 13) 0.0% 0 No Interest in any health/recreation center 7.4% ' 9 Total 121 20 16. Teen/Young Adult (ages 13-25) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $25.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $23.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $21.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $20.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $19.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21 17. 1 Adult (26-64) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $41.00 7 0 3 3 5 18 38.9% 0.0% 16.7% 16.7% 27.8% $39.00 6 0 3 4 5 18 33.3% 0.0% 16.7% 22.2% 27.8% $37.00 6 0 3 4 5 18 33.3% 0.0% 16.7% 22.2% 27.8% $33.00 6 0 3 2 7 18 33.3% 0.0% 16.7% 11.1% 38.9% $30.00 5 1 2 2 8 18 27.8% 5.6% 11.1% 11.1% 44.4% 22 18. Family Membership: 2 Adults The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $51.00 3 2 5 4 9 23 13.0% 8.7% 21.7% 17.4% 39.1% $49.00 2 2 6 3 10 23 8.7% 8.7% 26.1% 13.0% 43.5% $47.00 2 1 6 4 10 23 8.7% 4.3% 26.1% 17.4% 43.5% $44.50 2 1 5 3 12 23 8.7% 4.3% 21.7% 13.0% 52.2% $42.00 2 1 5 2 13 23 8.7% 4.3% 21.7% 8.7% 56.5% 23 19. Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $52.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $49.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $47.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $44.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $42.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24 20. Family Membership: 2 Adults with child(ren) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $62.00 3 0 2 5 6 16 18.8% 0.0% 12.5% 31.3% 37.5% $59.00 3 0 2 4 7 16 18.8% 0.0% 12.5% 25.0% 43.8% $56.00 2 1 2 3 8 16 12.5% 6.3% 12.5% 18.8% 50.0% $53.00 2 0 1 5 8 16 12.5% 0.0% 6.3% 31.3% 50.0% $50.00 1 0 1 5 9 16 6.3% 0.0% 6.3% 31.3% 56.3% 25 21. Senior (65+) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $37.50 30 1 4 6 14 55 54.5% 1.8% 7.3% 10.9% 25.5% $35.50 29 1 3 8 14 55 52.7% 1.8% 5.5% 14.5% 25.5% $34.00 28 1 3 8 15 55 50.9% 1.8% 5.5% 14.5% 27.3% $32.00 27 2 2 8 16 55 49.1% 3.6% 3.6% 14.5% 29.1% $29.00 19 2 4 8 22 55 34.5% 3.6% 7.3% 14.5% 40.0% 26 22. Youth (under 13) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $21.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $19.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $18.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $16.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $15.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27 23. What is your age range? 20s 0.8% 30s 2.5% 40s 10.7% 70+35.5% 50s 19% 60s 31.4% Statistics Teens 0.0% 0 Sum 7,070.0 20s 0.8% 1 Average 58.4 30s 2.5% I 3 StdDev 11.4 40s 10.7% , 13 Max 70.0 50s 19.0% 23 60s 31.4% 38 70+ 35.5% 43 Total 121 28 24. How many children under 18 do you have living at home? 4+1.7% 31.7% 2 6.8 1 4.2% 0 85.6 Statistics 0 85.6% 101 Sum 35.0 1 4.2% ' 5 Average 0.3 2 6.8% I 8 StdDev 0.8 3 1.7% 2 Max 4.0 4+ 1.7% 2 Total 118 29 25. Last year, in which category was your family's income? Up to$35,000 7.4% Refused to answer 22.3% $35,001 to$50,000 17.4% Over$100,000 26.5%- $50,001 to$100.000 26.5% Up to$35,000 7.4% ' 9 $35,001 to$50,000 17.4% . 21 $50,001 to$100,000 26.5% ■ 32 Over$100,000 26.5% 32 Refused to answer 22.3% ■ 27 Total 121 30 26. You indicated that you would need more information about the property tax increase to build the community center. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information?:Name Count Response 1 Barbara MacKay 1 Darrell 1 Donald Comstock 1 Katherine Patterson 1 Mrs. Untalan 1 Ned Miller 1 Nora Lowery 1 Steven Mattos 1 Terry 2 pat 31 26. You indicated that you would need more information about the property tax increase to build the community center. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information?:Phone Number Count Response 1 503-579-5708 1 503-684-2697 1 5032456842 1 5035901808 1 5035902834 1 5036201417 1 5036203666 1 5036395923 1 5039682066 32 26. You indicated that you would need more information about the property tax increase to build the community center. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information?:E-Mail Address Count Response 1 Dbowmer @frontier.com 1 carolross3 @comcast.net 1 elnoradesign @msn.com 1 mattos3806 @comcast.net 1 rayajr @frontier.com 33 27. Do not ask: What is the respondent's gender? Male 32.2% Female 67.8% Male 32.2% 39 Female 67.8% 82 Total 121 34 Filtered Report: Community Members 1. Are you or any child in your household a member of the YMCA or have you been a member in the past? 'No 100% No 100.0% 380 Yes 0.0% 0 Former Member 0.0% 0 Total 380 1 2. Where are/were you a member? Griffith Park Family YMCA 0.0% 0 Sherwood Regional Family YMCA 0.0% 0 Other(please specify) 0.0% 0 Total 0 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 380 2 3. How often do you exercise per week? I don't exercise on a regular basis 22.6% Once a week 4.2% -_ 3 or more times a week 58.4% 2 times a week 14.7% Statistics 3 or more times a week 58.4% 222 Sum 778.0 2 times a week 14.7% 56 Average 2.8 Once a week 4.2% I 16 StdDev 0.4 I don't exercise on a regular basis 22.6% Ill 86 Max 3.0 Total 380 3 4. Where do you exercise most often? Other(please specify)12.9% At home 52.7% Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym(which one?)34.4% At home 52.7% 155 Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym (which one?) 34.4% 101 YMCA (which one?) 0.0% 0 Other(please specify) 12.9% II 38 Total 294 Responses"Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym(which one?)" Count Left Blank 283 24 Hour Fitness 9 24 Hour fitness 3 24 Hours 2 24 Hr Fitness 1 24 Hr.fitness 1 24 hour 1 24 hour and LA fitness 1 24 hour fitness 10 24 hr 3 24 hr fitness 2 An athletic club 1 AnyTime Fitness 1 Body Balance. 1 4 Responses"Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym(which one?)" Count Boom Fitness 1 City recreation center 1 Club Sports 2 Condo gym 1 Crossfit Location 1 Crunch 3 Curves 2 Daytime Fitness 1 Elsie Stuhr in Beaverton 1 Fit Academe 1 Fit academy 1 Fit and Trim. 1 Harman Pool 1 Harmon Pool 1 Harper School 1 Health Spa 1 Karate Dojo 1 L A Fitness 1 LA Fitness 3 LA fitness 4 La Fitness 1 Legacy Rehab 1 Lost Park 1 Mac Club 1 Mercantile Health and Fitness Center 1 Nelson's Nautilis 1 Nike 1 Om dase Yoga studio 1 Planet Fitness 4 Planet Granite. 1 Planet fitness 1 5 Responses"Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym(which one?)" Count Plant Fitness 1 Progressive something? 1 Providence Facility 1 Providence Hospital Health plans 2 Rec Center 1 Swim Center 1 Tigard aquatic center 1 Tigurd Swim Center 1 Tualatin Hills Recreation Center 1 Villla sport 1 Work Gym 1 club sports 1 cross fit 1 curbs 1 curves 1 merchantile facility 1 refused to answer. 1 Responses"YMCA(which one?)" Count Left Blank 380 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 342 24 hour fitness 1 At work 2 Bike trails 1 Cycling/walking 1 Golf course/Summerfield Civic Assn. 1 Golf,Abs cruncher 1 Gym Teacher 1 Home Owner Assoc. Facility. 1 Neighborhood/local hospital volunteer 1 Neighborhood/local park 2 6 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Outdoor walks 1 Outdoors 2 Outdoors/Bowling alley 1 Residence gym 1 School 1 Summerfield Clubhouse 1 Walk 1 Walk outdoors 1 Walks 1 Wilsonville Community Center 1 Work walking 1 Yoga Studio 1 at work 1 community running 1 golf courses 1 park 1 run 1 tai chi 1 walk and run 1 walking 1 walking commuity 3 walks 1 work 1 7 5. I'm going to read a list of YMCA facilities. Please tell me whether you or someone in your household would use following never, sometimes or often. Never Sometimes Often Responses Cardiovascular Equipment like treadmills, bikes or elliptical 101 109 161 371 27.2% 29.4% 43.4% Free weights or machine weights for strength training 148 109 114 371 39.9% 29.4% 30.7% Open gym time 226 77 67 370 61.1% 20.8% 18.1% Group exercise classes such as: Body Sculpt,Zumba, Step Aerobics,TRX 191 101 79 371 51.5% 27.2% 21.3% Classes for youth such as art, music,dance,theater 304 37 30 371 81.9% 10.0% 8.1% Family Exercise classes and games like kickball,family Olympics and family Zumba, 306 45 20 371 family Yoga 82.5% 12.1% 5.4% Spinning/Group Cycling 256 76 39 371 69.0% 20.5% 10.5% Starter fitness programs 179 136 56 371 48.2% 36.7% 15.1% Yoga and Pilates 189 107 75 371 50.9% 28.8% 20.2% Pool 121 87 161 369 32.8% 23.6% 43.6% Child Watch(while parents work out) 13 22 371 3.5% 5.9% Personal Training 238 101 33 372 64.0% 27.2% 8.9% Specific classes for teens/teen programming 318 37 17 372 85.5% 9.9% 4.6% 8 6. What other facilities, equipment or programs would be important to you and your household? Count Response 1 12 Week program 1 ;programs for seniors 1 A nice variety of teen programming 1 A track 1 Adaptive things for people with arthritis.Arthritic Pool. 1 Affordable community center membership; rock climbing instruction 1 Art, music and dance for senior adults 1 Arthritic Pool. 1 Arts and crafts 1 Balance classes and exercise classes for seniors. 1 Basketball and soccer 1 Basketball leagues for kids 1 Binyasa yoga/Deep Stretch Yoga 1 Body pump,swim team 1 Cheaper prices 1 Classes for senior 2 Classes for senior adults 1 Classes for special needs kids. 1 Classes in CPR for teachers to recert/Baby sitting class 1 Core Strength Training. 1 Cushioned tennis courts,a nice variety of cardio equipment 1 Dance classes for seniors 1 Full day summer sports camps,youth sports programming 1 I can't think of anything 1 I don't know 1 I love OPEN GYM with Gymnastics for tumbling for under 6 1 I would like for the YMCA to incorporate a soccer field for the children. 1 Jazzercise classes 1 Kickboxing classes 1 Locker room,shower,etc. 9 Count Response 1 Low impact aerobics,senior classes over 50 1 Martial Arts with a mat room for practice. 1 Membership covered by Medicare 2 No 5 None 1 None I know of 1 None I know of now 1 None I would not be able to afford the Y unless it was free. 6 None at this time. 1 None of the above since I belong to another gym 1 None that I can think of. 2 Not at this time. 3 Nothing 1 Nutrition and cookings classes,arts and crafts 1 Nutrition classes for all ages 1 Outside bicycle track 1 Physically handicapped children programs 1 Programs for seniors. 2 Racquet ball 1 Racquetball Courts 1 Racquetball courts. 1 Racquetball or squash courts 1 Racquetball, basketball,volleyball 1 Resistance training with bands 1 Rock Climbing 1 Sauna 1 Sauna and therapy pool 1 Senior adult classes 1 Senior related programs. 1 Showers and towel service 1 Sports classes for kids/sports leagues for kids/summer camps 10 Count Response 1 Steam room and sauna 1 Stretching classes 1 Swim classes and a kid friendly pool 1 Swim instruction 1 Swimming Pool. 1 Swimming lessons for adults 1 Tai Chi 1 Tai Chim, Bouldering 1 Tai chi 1 Tai chi classes 1 Tennis Courts 1 Tennis and courts and pickle ball or ping pong 1 Tennis and volleball and golf balls into net 1 They need to put it where busses can access it. 1 Whrilpool 1 arthritis pool 1 basketball court 1 climbing wall fencing class 1 dance classes 1 group or team sports 1 make classes for older kids during because of home schooling. 1 marshall arts 1 none at this time. 1 recreation swimming for family time 1 rock wall and sumer camps 1 senior exercise classes 1 she broke her femer and has to be careful walking track 1 sports for adults and tennis 1 try's a bike 1 warm water pool 1 water aerobics 11 Count Response 1 water aerobics. 1 I walk daily for my health and I am also a member of a book club.I am older so I would like to see more programs to do with the elderly. 1 i would like for you to provide some christian based services such as class that offer christian based music. 1 Warm water therapy pool,sauna,and steam room;a variety of gentle type classes in the water and out of the water 1 None I can think of. I am a senior though and would be under silver sneakers my insurance pays for my membership if I had one. 1 I think that there need to be more classes for seniors,because in my area there are a lot of seniors. 1 It makes absolutely no sense to even suggest a YMCA we have plenty of places to exercise.This place is congested enough. It is a crazy idea! 1 They are fibermyalgia and have to use a warm pool would join to use it if had one they need programs geared toward seniors in the area thats been a problem 1 Gymnasium to play volley ball and basketball just a place to drop in but not have to be a member somewhere. 12 7. Do you have children under the age of 18 in your household? Yes 22.6% No 77.4% Yes 22.6% ■ 86 No 77.4% 294 Total 380 13 8. How interested would the children in your household be to use the new YMCA facility? -\Not Interested 9.3% Neutral 18.6% Interested 72.1% Interested 72.1% 62 Neutral 18.6% . 16 Not Interested 9.3% ' 8 Total 86 14 9. What YMCA activities would be of most interest to your children? Please check all that apply. 100 88.5% 80 66.7% 60.3% 60 56.4% 57.7% 40 28.2% 20 0 Open Swim Time Swim Lessons Youth Sports Program Open Gym Meet Friends Other(please specify) Open Swim Time 88.5% 69 Swim Lessons 56.4% 44 Youth Sports Program 60.3% 47 Open Gym 66.7% 52 Meet Friends 57.7% 45 Other(please specify) 28.2% 22 Total 78 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 359 Access to the work out equiptment 1 Arts classes 1 Dance Classes 1 Dancing 1 Family activities. 1 Full day summer camps 1 Gymnastics 1 Have a party room 1 Late night hang outs 1 Music/Art 1 Programs for special needs kids. 1 15 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Rock climbing 1 Rock climbing team 1 Social events for teens 1 Summer Camps 1 Swim team 1 basketball 1 dance classes 1 kids triathlon 1 oragami,arts and crafts 1 robotics and nature 1 Responses"Other(please specify)" Count Left Blank 377 Arts and crafts classes,cooking classes for kids 1 Sports Leagues 1 Weights 1 16 10. One suggested location is in Downtown Tigard, on the trail system. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being most convenient and 1 being very inconvenient, how convenient is this location for you? UntamNiar with location 3.7% �1-Very Inconvenient 5.5% -\ 2-Inconvenient 3.7 3-Neutral 13.4% 5-Very Convenient 51.1% 4-Convenient 22.6% Statistics 1 Very Inconvenient 5.5% ' 21 Sum 1,516.0 2- Inconvenient 3.7% I 14 Average 4.1 3- Neutral 13.4% , 51 StdDev 1.1 4-Convenient 22.6% 86 Max 5.0 5-Very Convenient 51.1% 194 Unfamiliar with location 3.7% 14 Total 380 17 11. Another suggestion is the 99 Corridor near Bull Mountain.. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being most convenient and 1 being very inconvenient, how convenient is this location for you? Unfamiliar with location 1.3% I 1-Very Inconvenient 12.4% 2-Inconvenient 10% 5-Very Convenient 41.6% 3-Neutral 16.3% 4-Convenient 18.4% Statistics 1 -Very Inconvenient 12.4% , 47 Sum 1,379.0 2- Inconvenient 10.0% , 38 Average 3.7 3- Neutral 16.3% . 62 StdDev 1.4 4-Convenient 18.4% 70 Max 5.0 5-Very Convenient 41.6% 158 Unfamiliar with location 1.3% 5 Total 380 18 12. Did you vote in the last Presidential election? Refused to answer 3.7% No42°/, Yes 92.1% Yes 92.1% 350 No 4.2% I 16 Refused to answer 3.7% 14 Total 380 19 13. Do you own your home or do you rent? Refused to answer 4.2% Rent 7.9%-\ Own 87.9% Own 87.9% 334 Rent 7.9% ' 30 Refused to answer 4.2% 16 Total 380 20 14. The YMCA and the City of Tigard are considering a collaboration to build a new community center owned by the city. The building would be over 60,000 square feet, deliver a full array of programming and activities, and would require voters to consider a property tax increase of about $10 per month for the average homeowner. What is your willingness to pay this amount to build a center? Need More Information 22.5% Support 42% Not Sure 15% Oppose 20.4% Support 42.0% 140 Oppose 20.4% ■ 68 Not Sure 15.0% , 50 Need More Information 22.5% ■ 75 Total 333 21 15. If you used the YMCA, what type of membership would apply to you or your family? Teen/Young Adult(ages 13-25)1.1% No Interest in any health/recreation center 17.4% Adult(ages 26-64)12.9% Youth(under 13)0.5% Family Membership:2 Adults 16.3% Family Membership:Adult plus 1 chit 2.6% Senior(65+)31.1% Family Membership:2 Adults with child(ren)18.2% Teen/Young Adult(ages 13-25) 1.1% 4 Adult(ages 26-64) 12.9% , 49 Family Membership:2 Adults 16.3% . 62 Family Membership:Adult plus 1 child 2.6% I 10 Family Membership:2 Adults with child(ren) 18.2% ■ 69 Senior(65+) 31.1% 118 Youth(under 13) 0.5% 2 No Interest in any health/recreation center 17A% 66 Total 380 22 16. Teen/Young Adult (ages 13-25) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $25.00 2 0 1 0 1 4 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% $23.50 1 1 1 0 1 4 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% $21.00 1 0 2 0 1 4 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% $20.00 1 0 1 1 1 4 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% $19.00 1 0 0 1 2 4 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 23 17. 1 Adult (26-64) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $41.00 26 5 6 3 9 49 53.1% 10.2% 12.2% 6.1% 18.4% $39.00 26 3 7 4 9 49 53.1% 6.1% 14.3% 8.2% 18.4% $37.00 21 4 7 6 11 49 42.9% 8.2% 14.3% 12.2% 22.4% $33.00 18 4 6 7 14 49 36.7% 8.2% 12.2% 14.3% 28.6% $30.00 13 2 5 8 21 49 26.5% 4.1% 10.2% 16.3% 42.9% 24 18. Family Membership: 2 Adults The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $51.00 26 6 4 9 17 62 41.9% 9.7% 6.5% 14.5% 27.4% $49.00 24 8 4 9 17 62 38.7% 12.9% 6.5% 14.5% 27.4% $47.00 22 8 5 5 22 62 35.5% 12.9% 8.1% 8.1% 35.5% $44.50 21 7 5 6 23 62 33.9% 11.3% 8.1% 9.7% 37.1% $42.00 14 6 4 6 32 62 22.6% 9.7% 6.5% 9.7% 51.6% 25 19. Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $52.00 5 0 2 2 1 10 50.0% 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% $49.50 4 1 2 2 1 10 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% $47.00 4 0 2 3 1 10 40.0% 0.0% 20.0% 30.0% 10.0% $44.50 4 0 1 3 2 10 40.0% 0.0% 10.0% 30.0% 20.0% $42.00 4 0 0 3 3 10 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 26 20. Family Membership: 2 Adults with child(ren)The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $62.00 15 4 13 12 25 69 21.7% 5.8% 18.8% 17.4% 36.2% $59.00 15 3 11 13 27 69 21.7% 4.3% 15.9% 18.8% 39.1% $56.00 11 4 11 15 28 69 15.9% 5.8% 15.9% 21.7% 40.6% $53.00 10 3 7 20 29 69 14.5% 4.3% 10.1% 29.0% 42.0% $50.00 6 2 7 11 43 69 8.7% 2.9% 10.1% 15.9% 62.3% 27 21. Senior (65+) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $37.50 61 7 14 16 20 118 51.7% 5.9% 11.9% 13.6% 16.9% $35.50 58 8 14 18 20 118 49.2% 6.8% 11.9% 15.3% 16.9% $34.00 56 8 15 15 24 118 47.5% 6.8% 12.7% 12.7% 20.3% • $32.00 54 8 13 17 26 118 45.8% 6.8% 11.0% 14.4% 22.0% $29.00 40 8 13 17 40 118 33.9% 6.8% 11.0% 14.4% 33.9% 28 22. Youth (under 13) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is No Interest, 2 is Little Interest, 3 is Not Sure, 4 is Some Interest, and 5 is A Lot of Interest. 1 -No Interest 2-Little Interest 3-Not Sure 4-Some Interest 5-A Lot of Interest Responses $21.00 1 0 0 1 0 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% $19.50 1 0 0 1 0 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% $18.00 1 0 0 1 0 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% $16.50 1 0 0 1 0 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% $15.00 1 0 0 0 1 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 29 23. What is your age range? 54s 0.3% Teens 0.3% 20s 1.6 / 30s 6.7 70+23.9% 40s 15.6% 50s 21.8 60s 29.8% Statistics Teens 0.3% 1 Sum 20,184.0 20s 1.6% I 6 Average 54.4 30s 6.7% ' 25 StdDev 12.8 40s 15.6% 58 Max 70.0 50s 21.8% ■ 81 60s 29.8% 111 70+ 23.9% ■ 89 54s 0.3% 1 Total 372 30 24. How many children under 18 do you have living at home? 4+2.7% 3 4.2% 2 10.6% 1 5.6% 077% Statistics 0 77.0% 291 Sum 189.0 1 5.6% I 21 Average 0.5 2 10.6% ' 40 StdDev 1.0 3 4.2% I 16 Max 4.0 4+ 2.7% I 10 Total 378 31 25. Last year, in which category was your family's income? iUp to$35,000 10.3% Refused to answer 27.4% $35,001 to$50,000 9.2% { 1 $50,001 to$100,000 29% Over$100,000 24.2% Up to$35,000 10.3% , 39 $35,001 to$50,000 9.2% , 35 $50,001 to$100,000 29.0% 110 Over$100,000 24.2% 92 Refused to answer 27.4% . 104 Total 380 32 26. You indicated that you would need more information about the property tax increase to build the community center. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information?:Name Count Response 1 Alexis Graf 1 Allan Rumbaugh 1 Annemarie Rotaru 1 Dean Kirkpatrick 1 Frances Shields 1 Jennifer Lindsey 1 Joan 1 Joyce Shaber 1 Julie Sauer 1 Kent Ashli 1 Larry 1 Linda Difalco 1 Mary Bauman 1 Melissa Traill 1 Michael 1 Michael Rosa 1 Mr. Hobbs 1 Mrs.Allen Bivens 1 Nawdini Tiruvauur 1 Peter Bauer 1 Pia Wilson Body 1 Randa Rapp 1 Richard Stack 1 Rod Kerkering 1 Sandra King 1 Tine Oehler 1 Tom Cook 1 Walter Coate 1 decided doesn't want information 33 Count Response 1 pat 34 26. You indicated that you would need more information about the property tax increase to build the community center. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information?:Phone Number Count Response 1 503-639-2491 1 5032451968 1 5032464585 1 5033360795 1 5034300955 1 5034305049 1 5035211919 1 5035214047 1 5035792472 1 5035798349 1 5035901684 1 5035906070 1 5035908152 1 5035989700 1 5036201126 1 5036206880 1 5036241370 1 5036246153 1 5036249097 1 5036394537 1 5036707121 1 5036841215 1 5039681198 35 26. You indicated that you would need more information about the property tax increase to build the community center. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information?:E-Mail Address Count Response 1 Rodkerkering @gmail.com 1 carosa22 @msn.com 1 changed her mind 1 christykay2 @frontier.com 1 desjes @att.net 1 dstack @att.net 1 jackisurvey @gmail.com 1 jan_merchant @hotmail.com 1 jason_alexis @yahoo.com 1 lilmsjun @aol.com 1 peterwbauerlll @comcast.net 1 phlinda @aol.com 1 randarapp@msn.com 1 rt.oehler @frontier.com 1 would like it mailed 36 27. Do not ask: What is the respondent's gender? Male 32.9% Female 67.1% Male 32.9% 125 Female 67.1% 255 Total 380 37 YMCA of Columbia Willamette/City of Tigard (Pronounced like "Tiger"the animal.) Questions My name is calling on behalf of the YMCA and the City of Tigard (Tie-Guard). Were speaking with people in the area to determine interest in an expansion of community programs and services in your community. Could you help us by taking a few minutes to share your opinions with us? Intro and exercise habits Are you or any child in your household a member of the YMCA or have you been a member in the past? o No o Yes o Former Member (Member/Former Member) Where? How often do you exercise per week?* o 3 or more times a week o 2 times a week o Once a week o I don't exercise on a regular basis (skip if"I don't exercise on a regular basis"was answered)Where do you exercise most often? o At home o Non-YMCA fitness facility or gym (which one?): o YMCA (which one?): o Other(please specify): Programs The YMCA is excited about the work they do to help all ages and segments of the community get and stay healthy and is studying how a new facility would best serve the community. Would you or someone in your household use the following YMCA facilities never, sometimes or often? Never Sometimes Often Cardiovascular Equipment like ( ) ( ) ( ) treadmills, bikes or elliptical Free weights or machine weights for ( ) ( ) ( ) strength training Open gym time ( ) ( ) ( ) Group exercise classes such as: Body ( ) ( ) ( ) Sculpt, Zumba, Step Aerobics,TRX Classes for youth such as art, music, ( ) ( ) ( ) dance, theater Family Exercise classes and games like ( ) ( ) ( ) kickball, family Olympics and family Zumba, family Yoga Spinning/Group Cycling ( ) ( ) ( ) Starter fitness programs ( ) ( ) ( ) Yoga and Pilates ( ) ( ) ( ) Pool ( ) ( ) ( ) Child Watch (while parents work out) ( ) ( ) ( ) Personal Training ( ) ( ) ( ) Specific classes for teens/teen ( ) ( ) ( ) programming What other facilities, equipment or programs would be important to you and your household? Do you have children under the age of 18 in your household? o Yes o No (skip if"no children") How interested would the children in your household be to use the new YMCA facility? o Interested o Neutral o Not Interested (skip if"no children"was answered)What YMCA activities would be most of most interest to your children (check all that apply). o Open Swim time o Swim Lessons o Youth Sports Programs o Open Gym o Meet friends o Other (specify): Location We would now like to ask you the convenience of two possible locations for the Community Center One suggested location is in Down Town Tigard,on the trail system. On a scale of 1-5 with 5 being most convenient and 1 being not convenient at all how convenient is this location for you? (5) Very convenient (4) convenient (3) neutral (2) inconvenient (1) very inconvenient Another suggestion is the the 99 Corridor near Bull Mountain On a scale of 1-5 with 5 being most convenient and 1 being not convenient at all how convenient is this location for you? (5) Very convenient (4) convenient (3) neutral (2) inconvenient (1) very inconvenient Did you vote in the last Presidential Election? ( ) Yes ( ) No Do you own your home or do you rent? ( ) own ( ) rent (Skip if rent)The YMCA and the City of Tigard are considering a collaboration to build a new community center owned by the city. The building would be over 60,000 square feet, deliver a full array of programming and activities, and would require voters to consider a property tax increase of about$10 per month. What is your willingness to pay this amount to build a center? ( ) Support ( ) Oppose ( ) Not Sure ( ) Need More Information Membership Type If you used the YMCA,what type of membership would apply to you or your family? * o Teen/Young Adult (ages 13-25) o Adult (ages 26-64) o Family Membership: 2 Adults o Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child o Family Membership: 2 Adults with children) o Senior (65+) o No interest in any health/recreation center o Youth Pricin Teen/Young Adult(ages 13-25) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5,where 1 is no interest, 2 is little interest, 3 is not sure,4 is some interest and 5 is a lot of interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices.* 1: No 2: Little 3: 4: 5: A lot interest interest Not Some of sure interest interest $25.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $23.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $21.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $20.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $19.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 Adult (26-641 The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is no interest, 2 is little interest, 3 is not sure,4 is some interest and 5 is a lot of interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5",stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices.* 3: 4: 5: A lot 1: No 2: Little Not Some of interest interest sure interest interest $41.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $39.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $37.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $33.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $33.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Family Membership: 2 Adults The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is no interest,2 is little interest, 3 is not sure, 4 is some interest and 5 is a lot of interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5",stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices.* 3: 4: 5:A lot 1: No 2: Little Not Some of interest interest sure interest interest $51.00 () () () () () $49.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $47.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $44.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $42.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Family Membership: Adult plus 1 child The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5,where 1 is no interest, 2 is little interest, 3 is not sure,4 is some interest and 5 is a lot of interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5",stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices.* 1: No 2: Little 3: 4: 5: A lot interest interest Not Some of sure interest interest $52.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $49.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $47.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $44.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $42.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Family Membership: 2 Adults with child(ren) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5,where 1 is no interest, 2 is little interest, 3 is not sure, 4 is some interest and 5 is a lot of interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices.* 1: No 2: Little 3: 4: 5: A lot interest interest Not Some of sure interest interest $62.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $59.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $56.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) • $53.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $50.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Senior(65+) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to register your child(ren) if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5,where 1 is no interest, 2 is little interest, 3 is not sure, 4 is some interest and 5 is a lot of interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices.* 1: No 2: Little 3: 4: 5:A lot interest interest Not Some of sure interest interest $37.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $35.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $34.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $32.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $29.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Youth (under 13) The residents of the city would receive a special membership rate for the new Y facility. If the new YMCA offered the programs and facilities you want, how likely would you be to have your child join if the monthly fees were as follows: Please rate on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is no interest, 2 is little interest, 3 is not sure, 4 is some interest and 5 is a lot of interest. Interviewer: Once a respondent rates a price a "5", stop asking prices and fill out "5" for the remainder of the prices.* 1: No 2: Little 3: 4: 5: A lot interest interest Not Some of sure interest interest $21.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $19.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $18.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $16.50 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) $15.00 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Demographics What is your age range? o 20's o 30's o 40's o 50's o 60's o 70+ How many children under 18 do you have living at home? o 0 o 1 o 2 o 3 o 4+ Last year, in which category was your family's income? o Up to $35,000 o $35,001 to $50,000 o $50,001 to $100,000 o Over$100,000 o Prefer not to answer (do not ask) What is your gender? o Male o Female (Question on raise income tax question-"Need More Information") You indicated that you would need more information about the community. Would you like us to contact you to provide more information? Contact information: Interviewer Only* Interviewer Name: Address: 5 Digit Zip: Phone # Dialed: Thank You! Thank you for taking our survey. Your response is very important to us. �.�_ , .. . wi daxko T2consultlng S SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET a FOR / re ti 12, 29015- (DATE OF MEETING) ill ,, '' x City of Tigard YMCA of Columbia-Willamette Feasibility Study Report Findings & Hi_ hchllights iii - May, 2015 Prepared by: Constance Miller & John Perdue r I daxko PurPurpose and Methodology T2 consulting p Goal: To determine community support levels for building a facility operated by the YMCA and funded by tax dollars Feasibility study specifically scoped to include: • Appropriate pricing • Forecast membership and usage • Forecast demand for programs, facilities, and features National call center approach: • Representative contact lists of registered voters living within Tigard city limits • Screening questions related to home ownership • 501 qualified completed respondents (4.32% margin of error, 95% confidence level) • 380 Community members • 121 Current and former Y members p Parking Lot: The results may be used to identify areas where stakeholders decide to dig- deeper and conduct additional analysis KING i ) "My best analysis leads me to more questions e el 2 ►�� daxko Market Area Demographics & Psychographics T2 consulting Incomes and home values are high compared to many YMCA markets and families are primarily educations professionals. Respondent demographics and city profile display a strong potential market. Market Profile • Population growing faster than the U.S. as a whole • Age, % of households with children and home ownership rates on par with national averages • Median family income and home values are higher than national averages Tapestry Segmentation National defined lifestyle segments indicate a majority of educated professionals, including: • Bright Young Professionals = young, educated, working professionals • Soccer Moms = affluent, family oriented, two working adults with children • Enterprising Professionals = young, well-educated STEM professionals • Emerald City's = young renters with no children, well-educated, median U.S. income • Metro Fusion = young, diverse renters with young children e (5)41. 3 ►�# daxko Current Exercise Habits T2 consulting Tigard's population has a high incidence of regular exercise and relatively high use of exercise facilities. • Nearly 61 % of respondents currently exercise 3+ times per week • 1 /2 exercise at home + 1 /3 exercise at a gym • Use of for-profit fitness centers is strong and those used most often are not located within the City of Tigard % of Exercise Per Week it 3 or more times a week 20.8% 2 times a week 4.2% Once a week 14A% I don't exercise on a regular basis 0 4 ►�� daxko Demand for Programs and Facilities T2 consulting % with those with children interested in using the Y When asked about the likely frequency of use, 10.5% respondents indicated a "pool" (46.7%) and "cardiovascular" (45.7%) exercise to be the of most interested at a potential Tigard YMCA. 18.3% P Interested • Neutral 71 .2% of respondents with children reporting they 71.2% would be "very interested" in using the potential Not Interested facility. Would use often... Pool Cardiovascular Equipment like treadmills,bikes or elliptical Free weights or machine weights for strength training Group exercise classes such as:Body Sculpt,Zumba,Step Aerobics,TRX Yoga and Pilates Open gym time Starter fitness programs Spinning/Group Cycling Personal Training Classes for youth such as art,music,dance,theater Family Exercise classes and games like kickball,family Olympics and family Child Watch(while parents work out) Specific classes for teens/teen programming 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 5 daxko Support for New Facility T2 consulting Financial Su pp 41 .9% of homeowners would support a $10/month property tax increase for a new Y facility in Tigard; 39% are unsure or need more information Note: findings are market research based and not interchangeable with voter polling % of Homeowners Support for Proposal 0.09, 5.0% 10.090 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% Support Need More Information � l Not Sure Oppose 0 6 ► 4 daxko Membership Demand T2 consulting The most commonly selected membership types reported: • Family membership of 2 adults and no children (29.3%) • Family membership of 2 adults and children (29.3%) • Adult age 26-64 (23.1 %) % Interest in Membership Types 3.49'0 1.4% 0.7% •Family Membership:2 Adults Family Membership:2 Adults 12.8% with child(ren) Adult(ages 26-64) Senior(65+) •Family Membership:Adult plus �yy 1 child •Teen/Young Adult(ages 13-25) 0 7 ► 1 daxko Membershi p Forecast T2 consulting Based on conservative estimates, a new facility in Tigard would attract approximately 1 ,747 to 2,274 membership units within 3 years These projections are comparable to an existing Y near this market area *the lowest price point = outlier Membership Price Total potential 1,747 1,836 2,060 2,274 3,106 new membership units at price level daxko Recommendations T2 consulting Based on study results . .. • Proceeding with steps in developing a new Y facility by using the forecasts of demand at different price levels and related findings to determine potential facility size and viable offerings • Consider plans to publicize/communicate the potential new facility to the community in light of comparatively low opposition • Exploring location options within downtown Tigard Y MAC, 9 daxko Parking Lot T2 consulting The Parking Lot is where questions that required additional analysis are captured for consideration and planning potential next steps. p KING "My best analysis leads me to more questions" YMCA of Columbia-Willamette County & City of Tigard potential questions (so far): • Voter polling in follow-up to levels of homeowner support expressed? • Explore where community center fits within city priorities at this time? • Consider steps needed to take a facility bond measure for voter consideration in context of other city priorities for funding and facilities? • Determine capital and operating costs that might be indicated in Tigard for potential center or a potential facility size that may be feasible? • Consider how a future partnership with a recreational operator might be structured in terms of an agreement? • Consider timing and planning needed for site and facility planning, design, and construction? 0 AIS-2200 9. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 05/12/2015 Length (in minutes):25 Minutes Agenda Title: Continued Discussion on Charter Review Prepared For: Liz Newton,City Management Submitted By: Norma Alley, City Management Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting -Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Continued discussion on possible revisions to the City's Municipal Charter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Review, discuss and reach consensus on specific revisions to the City's Municipal Charter KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At the March 17,2015 workshop meeting council discussed potential revisions to the City's Charter. The mayor and each councilor identified provisions of the charter they are interested in changing. (An excerpt from the draft minutes is attached.) There were several provisions identified by more than one councilor.A summary of the discussion on each of those topics follows. •Term limits - Either abolish or raise term limits. One specific suggestion is an eight year term limit for mayor and twelve years for city councilors. •Requirement that sitting mayor/councilor resign to run for another city office - Remove the provision allowing those in office to resign after election to another city office. •Councilors elected at large or by district -Raised by three councilors.Two councilors prefer retaining at large representation. •Size/number of councilors - Raised by two councilors; one supports the current size/number;one suggests reconsideration. •Term for council president-Raised by two councilors who support changing the term from two years to one year. •Charter revisions submitted to the voters by this council should be prospective and not apply to current mayor and councilors -This would not be a change in the Charter but language included in the ballot title. •Clarification of the Willamette River section -Does it apply to the Tualatin Valley Water District?It is the opinion of the city attorney that it does not. A matrix is attached that summarizes the Charter provisions of neighboring cities on some of the subjects discussed by council. The council has expressed interest in placing proposed Charter revisions on the November 2015 ballot. The deadline for filing ballot measures for the November 2015 ballot is August 14,2015. A public hearing is required prior to filing.To ensure there is adequate time for public outreach before the ballot title has been finalized,it would be prudent to schedule a public hearing at the end of June. Draft ballot language would be reviewed and public input could be taken. Additional outreach could be conducted and the council could consider and adopt the final ballot title language at the end of July. In order to meet this timeline, council will need to provide clear direction to staff on each provision proposed for changes at the conclusion of this discussion. The city attorney will then be directed to draft specific language for each proposed revision. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS Included as an item on the list of"Issues for Further Council Discussion" in the 2015-17 Tigard City Council goals adopted January 27,2015. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION December 22,2014 March 17,2015 Attachments March 17,2015 Council meeting minutes excerpt Charter Provision City Comparison Matrix AgendaQuick©2005-2015 Destiny Software Inc.,All Rights Reserved Charter Amendment Information by City ICNI.A Charter Amendments BY CITY: Beaverton Forest Grove King City Lake Oswego Sherwood Tualatin Hillsboro Wilsonville liMINNIN Requires resignation to run for (/infer rloevi't diterf/ (haler e/necn'/Ito 1/) Councilors must Cornier dire n'I directly Charter doevt'i Ito ilp C hailer rloevt'/dIm ilt' Charter doem'I e/rn//Y aL/reu - - - • (hawser doesn't dimrdp rv/dm.rr Mayor/Council position? address aeldrref resign to run at/dm.cr ,ulrbrrc ,rdrhrrr Term Limits Ni No Ni Yes Yes Yes Yes Not to exceed R unlimited 4-yr terms unlimited 4-Vr term, unlimited'_-Vr terms unlimited 2-Vr terms unlimited 4-scar terms limited 2 o msccutive terms unlimited 4-yr terms Mayor et msecutn e years limited to 3 three Not to exceed 8 limited to 3 consecutive 4- consecutive terms, Councilors unlimited 4-yr terms unlimited 4-Vr temp, unlimited 4-Ir terms limited 2 consecutive temrs unlimited 4--yr terms consecutive years cr trims (201-I Arlen) including any partial term as cnuncdor. Council Size 7 Councilors,they elect Councilor positions 5 Councilors 6 Councils trs the Mayor from 6 Councilors 6 Councilors 6 Councilors 6 Councilors 4 Councilors Council back :\t large. l'nuoat#.<riprralyd Run in Wards,2 Positions Councilors represent:Districts At- Position numbers At large At large :\t large in'o!!deities l osrtnm numbers per Ward elected \i Inge large/Position Council President Role I or 2-year[cirri?' I-year term 1 year term 2-year term(ocld yrs) 1-year term I-year term 2-year term(odd yrs) 2-pear term(odd yrs) 2-year term(odd yrs) council elects at I st mtg Couneil4 rcs elect eu 1st Councilors elect(ct?lot Does the role rorate/yoted/assigned by% Counciors eleU Councilors elect Councilors elect 'a elect Councilors elect(u)1st mtg of year mtg mtg Mid-terra Council Vacancies >I yr remaining,council Filled by dcction if 13 t r Sect.-Loa U. Appointed by Council and Appointed by Mayor Vacant%!Acted by elects.<1 year special Appointed lay remaining \ppninnnents to fill Appointed by majority or mitre remain in term, Council appoint, Council appoints continues until fan.1 Council Goes to Voters% election,but o nmal can council vacancies in elective of council,if>9))days less than that is Council following the next biennial appoint interim offices of the city shall be to election can fill sy/a appointment election.I f the term of made by council action pro tern appt. office doesn't expire, even if the membership 27(e)The council is the final remainder thereof shall be tails below the quorum judge of the election and odu•nrisc required. filled by electron I qualifications of its members ICMA Recommendation Charter Reform whitepaper 11/n9 Structure of charter should enhance problem solving. Consider:1)what problems/opportunities are change proponents trying to address,2)what is not working as well as it should,3)what is the evidence that changing the charter would fix the problem-or open up a new opp triunity% Excerpt from March 17,2015 Tigard City Council minutes. 5. DISCUSSION ON POTENTIAL CHARTER REVIEW laAssistant City Manager Newton led a discussion on this item. She gave history of past charter amendments,which must be voted on by the citizens. She noted that some sections are broadly written such as Section 20,which addresses the mayor's responsibility to appoint committees. She said there is actually a robust process that is not spelled out in the charter. Other sections are more specific. She said council has identified some potential charter changes and suggested they consider how specific they want things to be and what degree of latitude they want council to have. Council President Snider: • The requirement for any councilor running for mayor to resign is troubling. It is disadvantaging for two councilors due to the election schedule. • He said the current size of council is effective and efficient. • At large should be discussed. • The Willamette River Section should be discussed and the city attorney should clarify what it means to Tualatin Valley Water District. Councilor Goodhouse: • Council president term should change to one year • Abolish or raise term limits • Maintain "top two"vote getters;likes at large designation Councilor Henderson had a handout of potential charter changes and what the ballot make look like. This has been added to the packet for this meeting. He suggested these could be on the same ballot. • Concerned about retaining some knowledgeable people on council • Mayor and council term limits should change • Reconsider the number of councilors • Seat Representative (Should be a position,not the top two vote getters)Potential for geographic districts Mayor Cook: • Term limits are more appropriate at the federal level.At the local level,voting a candidate out is in effect, a term limit. • Any changes voted in by this council should not affect current office holders so changes aren't perceived as self-serving Councilor Woodard • Change council president every year • Eight year term limit for mayor,Twelve years for councilor • Prefers at large • Doesn't like the retain your seat part Excerpt from March 17, 2015 Tigard City Council minutes. Assistant City Manager Newton will collate this information and develop proposals for future council discussion. City Manager Wine asked if there were any other sources of input desired. Council President Snider suggested taking these ideas to the city's boards and committees. Assistant City Manager Newton suggested a discussion with the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task Force. A 9'enS4- / Pin S.-- SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR (DATE OF MEETING) Frd vh Coup cf (-)r-en Berson CHARTER AMENDMENT CHOICES TERM LIMIT FOR MAYORS 2 $1, NONE . 2 TERM LIMIT FOR COUNCILORS • �.� 3 NODE 3 NUMBER OF COUNCILORS 4 4 SEAT REPRFSL NAIIVE OPEN POSITION DIsTRPCT