07/10/2013 - Packet Completeness Review
for Boards, Commissions
and Committee Records
CITY OF TIGARD
Intergovernmental Water Board
Name of Board, Commission or Committee
07/10/2013
Date of Meeting
I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record.
Judy Lawhead
Print Name
sign• tUre
01/07/2015
Date
Intergovernmental Water Board Agenda
SERVING TIGARD,KING CITY,DURHAM AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: Wednesday,July 10, 2013, 5:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Public Works Building
8777 SW Burnham Street
Tigard, OR 97223
1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions
2. Approval of Minutes — May 8, 2013
Action: Motion to approve the May 8, 2013, minutes.
3. Public Comments
Call for comments from the public.
4. Water Supply Update —Dennis Koellermeier
No action required.
5. Update on Portland Contract Dispute — Dennis Koellermeier
No action required.
6. Update on Ownership Percentage Adjustment with Lake Oswego — Dennis Koellermeier
No action required.
7. Briefing on Water Treatment Plant Bid— Dennis Koellermeier
No action required.
8. Update on King City/Tigard Intergovernmental Agreement—Dennis Koellermeier
No action required.
9. Informational Items
No action required.
10. Non-Agenda Items
Call for non-agenda items from the board.
11. Next Meeting:
August 14, 2013 at 5:30 p.m.
8777 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon
12. Adjournment
Action: Motion for adjournment.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD AGENDA—July 10, 2013
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-718-2591 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of2
Executive Session
The Intergovernmental Water Board may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to
order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions
are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news
media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose
any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or
making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL WATER BOARD AGENDA—July 10, 2013
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-718-2591 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 oft
Intergovernmental Water Board JWB) Minutes
SERVING TIGARD,KING CITY,DURHAM AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 5:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Public Works Building
8777 SW Burnham Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Members Present:
Gretchen Buchner Representing the City of Tigard
Ken Henschel Representing the Tigard Water District
Keith Jehnke Representing the City of Durham
Dick Winn Representing the City of King City
Andrew Barrett Member-At-Large
Members Absent: None
City of Tigard Staff Present:
Dennis Koellermeier Public Works Director
John Goodrich Utility Division Manager
Kristie Peerman IWB Recorder
Visitors: Attorney Clark Balfour
1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions
Commissioner Buchner called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes —April 10, 2013
Commissioner Henschel moved to approve the April 10, 2013, minutes. Commissioner
Winn seconded the motion. The motion passed by majority vote of the commissioners
present,with Commissioners Barrett, Henschel,Jehnke and Winn voting yes.
Commissioner Buchner abstained.
3. Public Comments
There were no comments from the public.
4. Water Supply Update
Mr. Goodrich reported:
■ Average water use for the month of April was about 4.2 million gallons per day
(mgd). This usage is slightly higher when compared to the same time period last
year.
■ 131 million gallons (mg) were injected into aquifer storage and recovery (ASR)
well #2. With a water storage carry over from last year, current water storage is
210 mg. There is a 97.5-day supply stored in ASR#2.
■ Portland Water Bureau has not indicated that it expects any water shortages this
summer.
■ The City of Tigard is currently obtaining 1 mgd from Lake Oswego.
The board briefly discussed the City of Portland's water fluoridation issue and water
rates.
Commissioner Buehner questioned whether the city had budgeted enough money for
water purchases based on anticipated demand. Mr. Goodrich responded he allotted for
two billion gallons to be purchased. He added a contingency to the plan of
approximately .5 mg; this water would be available without further action by city council.
5. Update on the Draft Intergovernmental Agreement for Water Service — Clark
Balfour
Mr. Koellermeier introduced the redraft of the water service agreement entitled,
Preliminary Discussion New IGA regarding Water Service. The draft and a memo from Clark
Balfour outlining the revised agreement were sent by email to board members on
Monday, May 6, 2013, and are on file in the IWB record.
Mr. Balfour stated Tigard City Council requested member jurisdictions look at two
options:
■ Option A— City of Tigard (COT) would own all water system assets,which
was outlined and discussed in the draft at the February13, 2013, IWB meeting.
■ Option B - COT and jurisdictions would each own separate assets of the
water systems. COT would obtain full ownership of assets related to source,
treatment, transmission, pumping and storage. Each jurisdiction would own
and have complete control of its distribution system.
A handout of discussion points from Mr. Balfour was distributed to the board. This
document is on file in the 1" record.
Mr. Balfour stated King City is in agreement with Option A and intends to turn
everything over to COT and have COT run and manage its system. The question
remains are Tigard Water District (TWD) and Durham interested in pursuing Option B?
Commissioner Winn affirmed King City is in agreement with Option A and is ready to
sign a separate agreement.
Commissioner Buehner relayed the Tigard City Council cannot allow the current
agreement, as it exists, to continue past 2018.
Mr. Koellermeier stated the Tigard City Council directed staff to pursue a supplier/client
relationship not a partner/managing-partner relationship.
Commissioner Jehnke responded Durham wants to be a partner, not a purchaser.
Durham may consider other water supply options besides Tigard. Commissioner Jehnke
remains concerned with repayment of assets if Durham leaves the agreement.
Mr. Koellermeier and the board had a brief discussion on IGA draft version seven. Mr.
Koellermeier stated Tigard City Council came to the conclusion that this version was not
consistent with the approach the council wants to take.
Commissioner Henschel stated the TWD had not had time to review the newest
agreement. He could not provide any direction from the TWD.
Commissioners Henschel and Jehnke concurred that their jurisdictions are interested in
staying with Tigard, but as a partner not a purchaser.
Commissioner Buehner stated the annual joint meeting with the IWB jurisdictions and
the Tigard City Council has not occurred in the last few years. The meeting allowed
communication between IWB members and Tigard City Council, which allowed
members to voice their perspective to council.
Mr. Koellermeier will look into having a joint meeting put on the agenda of an upcoming
Tigard City Council workshop meeting.
Commissioner Buehner questioned the definition of service area boundaries. The board
had a brief discussion of service area boundary lines and definition of service area.
Commissioner Buehner said COT intended to maintain an advisory board. Mr. Balfour
stated in the new agreement the water advisory board would be created and continue to
comment on budget, rates and operational items; this is similar to current practice.
Mr. Koellermeier, Mr. Balfour and the board discussed the need for all jurisdictions to
commit to stay with the agreement until debt is paid off. Debt is built into water rates for
all user jurisdictions. Mr. Koellermeier will check on the wholesale debt withdrawal
penalty.
Mr. Koellermeier stated he has clear direction from King City and will draft an
agreement for King City; this agreement can be used as a model for other member
jurisdictions to review. The model would be similar to Clean Water Services or PGE
utility model.
Mr. Balfour stated the wholesale or supply rate for source, treatment, transmission,
pumping and storage would be a uniformed rate for each member jurisdiction.
Commissioner Herschel was concerned with the possibility of the COT withdrawing or
terminating the agreement. Mr. Balfour responded that under the agreement, COT
agrees to provide water to each member jurisdiction at the same quality and terms so
long as the jurisdiction remains a party to the agreement.
Mr. Balfour stated future discussion may be to redefine ownership and a possible change
so member jurisdictions own capacity in the assets. This concept was briefly discussed
with the board.
Mr. Koellermeier and Mr. Balfour will continue to work together on the capacity concept
and the King City agreement.
6. Consider Making a Recommendation to the Tigard Budget Committee and the
Tigard City Council on the City of Tigard's Water Division Budget—Dennis
Koellermeier
Mr. Koellermeier updated the board on Tigard's budget process:
■ The water operating budget and water Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
budget were approved by Tigard's Budget Committee on May 6, 2013.
Although the budget was approved prior to the May 8 IWB meeting, the IWB
members may still make recommendations to the Budget Committee prior to
the budget going to City Council on June 11, 2013.
■ Surplus balances for projects budgeted in fiscal year 2012-2013 will carry over
into fiscal year 2013-2014. Surplus balances exist for the following projects:
➢ ASR well #3
Pipeline connecting 550 zone to 530 zone
➢ Lake Oswego Tigard Water Partnership (approximately $7 million surplus)
Commissioner Buehner inquired on the status of ASR #3 construction. Mr.
Koellermeier stated COT is currently in the consultant selection process. Construction
should be complete, and ASR #3 should be operational within a year.
Commissioner Henschel presented a copy of the budget to the TWD board at their May
6 meeting. The TWD questioned the following budget items:
On page 299 of the Water Capital Improvement Plan, Lake Oswego-Tigard Partnership listed
x'121,905,400. Page 57 of the Enterprise Fund estimated $132 million.
Mr. Koellermeier stated the difference is monies already spent. The $121,905,400 figure
is not the project total, but the total of the five-year CIP. Mr. Koellermeier will confirm
with the finance department and email confirmation.
On page 166 of the mater Operating Budget, Salaries- General increased 14 percent.
Mr. Goodrich responded that the COT has had a vacant position which will soon be
filled. The position is needed, in part, to implement an extensive flushing initiative
associated with the Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership.
On page 167 of the Water Operating Budget, K&M Control Valves doubled from last fiscalyear.
Mr. Goodrich indicated the Water Division had a drop in number of valves rebuilt last
fiscal year. Numbers are expected to return to normal (rebuilding 15-20 valves) next
fiscal year.
On page 167 of the Water Operating Budget, Dues dam'Subscriptions increased 20 percent.
Mr. Goodrich stated COT is a member of American Water Works Association (AWWA);
other dues and subscription are also budgeted here.
On page 167 of the Dater Operating Budget, Bad Debt Expense showing a substantial increase.
Mr. Goodrich indicated the budget amount is a forecast and had been increased due to
the economy and recession.
On page 167 of the Water Operation Budget, Computer Hardware and Software proposed amount of
x'153,300.
Mr. Goodrich stated COT is switching from Hansen work order system and purchasing
a new system called MaintStar; this is a one-time expense.
On page 168 of the Water Operating Budget, Indirect Charges- Utility Billing increased 9.6 percent.
Mr. Goodrich reported COT added a utility billing supervisor position and the increase is
also due to several indirect administrative costs.
On page 168 of the Water Operating Budget, Indirect Charges-Fleet Maintenance increased 61 percent.
Mr. Goodrich responded the sizable increase is for the purchase of new fleet equipment.
The COT is using a cleaner truck as a hydro-excavator. The cleaner truck was purchased
used and is very expensive to maintain. A new hydro-excavator would cost approximately
$400,000. COT is still in the process of resolving whether it will keep the cleaner truck or
purchase a hydro-excavator.
On page 168 of the Water Operating Budget, Total Water has increased three million dollars, two years
inarow.
Mr. Goodrich and Mr. Koellermeier discussed the reallocation of cost based on actual
costs. They reported this reallocation resulted in an increase to the water operating
budget.
Should the Lake Oswego Partnership be apart of the Water Operating Budget?
Mr. Koellermeier was not certain and will check with the finance department.
Commissioner Henschel inquired about the current bond. Mr. Koellermeier stated the
current bond is a 30-year bond. The original plan was to issue three bonds over the life
of the project; that has changed to two bonds. The interest rate in 2012 was so favorable
that COT went with a 30-year bond. Another bond will be issued in 2014. The amount
of that bond is yet to be determined.
The board did not make a formal recommendation to the Tigard Budget Committee and
the Tigard City Council on the proposed 2013-2014 budget.
7. Consider Making a Recommendation to the Tigard Budget Committee and the
Tigard City Council on the City of Tigard's Water Capital Improvement Plan
Budget—Dennis Koellermeier
The board did not have separate discussion on Tigard's Water Capital Improvement
Plan. The plan was mentioned briefly in agenda item 6.
8. Informational Items
The board briefly discussed:
■ The Willamette River Water Coalition.
➢ Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) has decided to develop the Willamette
River water supply. Hillsboro may also be interested in developing this
source.
TVWD will soon issue two design contracts related to the Willamette River
supply.
➢ The Tigard City Council will discuss the TVWD's development of the
Willamette River supply at a workshop meeting on July 16, 2013.
■ The recent joint meeting with Lake Oswego.
The total water supply from the future Lake Oswego-Tigard supply is 38 mgd,
with 24 mgd allocated to Lake Oswego and 14 mgd allocated to Tigard.
Lake Oswego is considering allocating more water to COT.
■ The Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) and WaterWatch.
➢ Mr. Koellermeier stated the record has been filed with LUBA, but has
been challenged by the appellant. He was uncertain if this issue had been
resolved.
➢ The WaterWatch water rights issue is with the court of appeals. The COT
is awaiting word on a request for an expedited hearing.
■ Sherwood partnership.
➢ Mr. Koellermeier stated the COT needs to look over the future water
supply; there are three options to solve:
o Buy more water from Lake Oswego
o Go to the Willamette River through the Sherwood route, or
o Go to the Willamette River through the Hillsboro/TVWD route.
Commissioner Henschel inquired whether rates will decrease when areas 63 and 64
develop. Mr. Koellermeier stated any rate decrease would be minimal, as growth is
included in rate calculations.
9. Non-Agenda Items
The board did not discuss any non-agenda items.
10. Next Meeting
June 12, 2013 at 5:30 p.m.
Public Works Auditorium, 8777 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon
11. Adjournment
At 7:39 p.m. Commissioner Winn moved to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner
Henschel seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned by unanimous vote of the
commissioners present, with Commissioners Barrett, Buehner, Henschel,Jehnke and
Wi voting yes.
Gretchen Bueh er, IW hair Kristie Peer an, IWB Recorder
Date: 4-�-- Date: ].It -'�
- " City of Tigard
0
Memorandum
To: Intergovernmental Water Board Members
From: Public Works Director Dennis Koellermeier
Re: Contract Dispute–Portland Water Bureau Summer Interruptible Supply
Date: July 1, 2013
The City of Tigard purchases wholesale water from the Portland Water Bureau (PWB) under
a 10-year regional water sales agreement signed in July 2006. Under this agreement, the city
can purchase summer interruptible water, and Tigard has done so for the past three years.
Requests for summer interruptible water must be made to PWB before March 15 of each
year. This past March the city requested 30 million gallons of additional supply beginning in
July and ending in August 2013—a period of 60 days. This provides an additional half
million gallons per day (mgd) for peak use.
However, this year the city's request was denied by PWB. PWB indicated that it would
approve summer interruptible water use if the city abided by a new interpretation of the
existing agreement. Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD), and the Cities of Tualatin and
Tigard received letters denying summer interruptible supply unless each agreed to certain
conditions affecting the calculations for summer peaking use.
These conditions were not applied to any summer interruptible water since the agreement
took effect in 2006. TVWD, Tualatin and Tigard disagree with the interpretation and
implementation of restrictions regarding interruptible water and peaking factors.
Tigard may take action with TVWD and Tualatin in dispute resolution regarding this matter.
The PWB letter and Tigard's response are included. More information will be provided to
the I" at the July 10 board meeting.
r =
r rY PORTLAND Mayor Charlie Hales
David G.Shall,Administrator 4�
WATER 1120 SW 5th Avenue,Room 600
k.
BUREAU Portland,Oregon 97204-1926
Information:503-823-7404
FROM FOREST TO FAUCET www.portiandoregon.gov/water An Equal Opportunity Employer
April 30, 2013
John Goodrich
City of Tigard
Public Works Department
Utility Division Manager
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
Subject: 2013 Purchase of Summer Interruptible Water
Dear John:
I write in response to your offer to purchase a supply of interruptible water during the 2013 peak
season pursuant to Section 6.C.3. of City Tigard's wholesale water contract with the City of
Portland. Under the terms of the contract, you may "purchase water over and above" your
guaranteed purchase quantity. Section 6A. Interruptible water is made available to purchase "at
the City's discretion subject to terms of the Agreement." Section I.A.
I have determined that the City cannot accept your offer to purchase interruptible water without
changes. The City is, however, prepared to sell you the amount of interruptible water you seek
under the following terms and conditions.
1. You may use interruptible water to supplement firm guaranteed purchase water, but
not as a substitute for guaranteed purchase water. This has implications for
ratemaking and determinations of peaking factors. As you know, interruptible water
is to be excluded from the ratemaking and seasonal peaking analysis. Section 5.B.2.
This year, given City of Tigard's peaking factors, the guaranteed purchase water
delivered during the month's of July and August is calculated to be 372 million
gallons. For purposes of next year's rate analysis, at the end of the summer season,
the City will calculate City of Tigard's seasonal peaking factor by excluding either
the total request for interruptible water (31.0 million gallons) or any water delivered
to City of Tigard during July and August exceeding the calculated guaranteed
purchase amount, whichever is lower.
2. The contract also directs that interruptible water be excluded from calculation of a
customer's daily peaking factor. Section 5.13.3. The City will exclude City of
Tigard's interruptible water into calculation of next year's daily peaking factors as
follows: At the end of the season, the City will determine how much summer
interruptible water City of Tigard used over and above its guaranteed purchase
amount for July and August. Then the daily average of that amount over the 62 day
The City of Portland will make reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities. Please notify us no later than five(5)business days prior
to the event by phone 503-823-7404, by the City's TTY at 503-823-6868, or by the Oregon Relay Service at 1-800-735-2900.
period will be deducted from each actual daily peak delivery. When the interruptible
water is thus excluded, the City will then determine the daily average derived from
the highest three consecutive days of deliveries, which can be compared to the annual
average daily demand to calculate the daily peaking factor. (This assumes, of course,
that the daily peak will occur in the summer, which is consistent with your historical
usage.)
If this counter-offer is acceptable to you, please sign below indicating City of
Tigard's concurrence with the terms of sale of interruptible water for the summer
season of 2013. As you note in your letter, City of Tigard must make a confirmed
interruptible water payment, whether you take the water or not, except as provided in
Section 6.E.2. of the contract. As provided in Section 15.13 of the contract, the City
shall bill City of Tigard in two equal amounts for July and August. The preliminary
estimated monthly cost is $7,572.00. Once rates are approved by City Council and
pumping costs are updated, we will advise you of the exact monthly payment.
John Goodrich
Utility Division Manager
Thank you for your er to u-chase er interruptible water.
David G. Shaff, Administrator
Portland Water Bureau
Cc: Cecelia Huynh
Jan Warner
Page 2 of 2
May 22, 2013 City of Tigard
Mr. David Shaff
Water Bureau Administrator
City of Portland
1120 SW 5th Avenue, Room 600
Portland, OR 97204-1926
RE: 2013 Purchase of Summer Interruptible Water
Dear Mr. Shaff:
The City of Tigard received your April 30, 2013, letter responding to our request to purchase
summer interruptible water as allowed under Section 6 of the 2006 contract. Based upon your
letter, and subsequent email correspondence with Jan Warner of your staff, I understand you would
Eke to know whether Tigard accepts the additional terms outlined in your letter.
For the record, Tigard rejects the proposed new terms for the purchase of summer interruptible
water and would like the matter brought to the Water Managers Advisory Board (WMAB) for
discussion. Furthermore, Tigard agrees with the City of Tualatin's interpretation of the 2006
Regional Water Sales Agreement.
Tigard has always met the conditions of the contract and has never requested summer interruptible
water purchases to replace or reduce its peaking factors.
With regard to this matter, Tigard reserves the right to invoke the dispute resolution procedures
pursua
pt to the terms of the 2006 agreement.
Si eLoelIermeier
Public Works Director
c: Tigard City Manager Marty Wine
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 0 www.tigard-or.gov
Intergovernmental Water Board JWB) Minutes
SERVING TIGARD, KING CITY,DURHAM AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: Wednesday,July 10, 2013 5:30 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Public Works Building
8777 SW Burnham Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Members Present:
Gretchen Buchner Representing the City of Tigard
Ken Henschel Representing the Tigard Water District
Keith Jehnke Representing the City of Durham
Andrew Barrett Member-At-Large
Members Absent:
Dick Winn Representing the City of King City
City of Tigard Staff Present:
Dennis Koellermeier Public Works Director
Greer Gaston IWB Recorder
1. Call to Order, Roll Call and Introductions
Commissioner Buchner called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes —May 8, 2013
Commissioner Henschel moved to approve the May 8, 2013, minutes. Commissioner
Barrett seconded the motion. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the
commissioners present,with Commissioners Barrett, Buchner, Henschel, and Jehnke
voting yes.
3. Public Comments
There were no comments from the public.
4. Water Supply Update
Mr. Koellermeier reported:
■ Average water use for the month of June was about 6.83 million gallons per day
(mgd). This usage is 1 mgd higher when compared to the same time period last
year.
■ Tigard is also using water from its aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells. The
city has used 17 mg from ASR well #1 and 58 mg from ASR well #2.
Approximately 90 mg of water remains in ASR wells; this equates to a 70-day
supply.
■ Water consumption will be greater than last year.
■ The Portland Water Bureau does not anticipate any water supply issues.
5. Update on Portland Contract Dispute
Mr. Koellermeier referred to a memo in the IWB packet. The Portland Water Bureau
(PWB) has changed its interpretation of the regional water sales agreement as the
agreement pertains to summer interruptible water purchases. The new interpretation
results in higher costs to those wholesale customers purchasing this water.
Tigard did not purchase any summer interruptible this year, but has requested mediation
with the PWB to support other wholesale customers—like the Tualatin Valley Water
District and the City of Tualatin—that did intend to purchase this water.
6. Update on Ownership Percentage Adjustment with Lake Oswego
Mr. Koellermeier briefed the board on Lake Oswego's offer to allocate an additional four
million gallons (mg) of water to Tigard under the Lake Oswego Tigard Water
Partnership.
The additional water would increase Tigard's allocation from 14 to 18 million gallons per
day and would also increase Tigard's cost share in the project. Depending on growth, 18
mgd could be enough water to meet customer demand within the Tigard Water Service
Area through the year 2025 or 2030.
The Tigard City Council authorized staff to enter into negotiations with Lake Oswego
regarding the additional water.
Commissioner Henschel inquired how the additional water would affect rates. Mr.
Koellermeier said there were too many variables in play to determine how rates may be
impacted. The cost of the additional water may be eligible for system development
charge funding; this may offset rate increases to some extent. Mr. Koellermeier said the
additional water was the least expensive means to meet future water demand.
7. Briefing on Water Treatment Plant Bid
Mr. Koellermeier distributed a memo from Joel Komarek regarding construction bids to
expand the water treatment plant. The memo is on file in the I" record.
Seven bids were received ranging from $50 to $90 million. The two lowest bids were
ultimately disqualified, and the Lake Oswego City Council is slated to award the
expansion project to the third lowest bidder, Slayden Construction Group. Slayden's bid
was $3 million under the engineer's estimate.
8. Update on King City/Tigard Intergovernmental Agreement
Mr. Koellermeier reported that Tigard and King City have met twice to work on an
intergovernmental agreement. The agreement will be made available to other IWB
jurisdictions once it is in near-final form and Tigard and King City are ready to release it.
The agreement will likely be discussed at a King City council meeting.
Commissioner Henschel said the Tigard Water District felt there were advantages to
having all the IWB member jurisdictions sign one agreement. Commissioner Jehnke
concurred.
9. Informational Items
None
10. Non-Agenda Items
The board did not discuss any non-agenda items.
11. Next Meeting
August 14, 2013 at 5:30 p.m.
Public Works Auditorium, 8777 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon
Commissioner Buehner and Mr. Koellermeier reviewed possible agenda topics for
upcoming meetings:
■ The intergovernmental agreement between Tigard and King City.
■ Negotiations on additional water with Lake Oswego. This may be discussed in
executive session.
■ Water treatment plant expansion contract award.
■ National Marine Fisheries Service permitting issue.
■ Summer water supply update.
■ Oral arguments at the Land Use Board of Appeals.
■ WaterWatch case with the Court of Appeals.
■ Update on the contract dispute with the Portland Water Bureau.
12. Adjournment
At 6 p.m. Commissioner Henschel moved to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner
Jehnke seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned by unanimous vote of the
commissioners present, with Commissioners Barrett, Buehner, Henschel and Jehnke
voting yes.
d_ 4___JVJ
BueI hair neer Gaston, IWB Recorder
hn r,
Date: Date: ' �►�. Q�.1�"