The URL can be used to link to this page

03/02/2009 - Packet ohC '' City of Tigard TIGARD Planning Commission — Agenda MEETING DATE: March 2, 2009, 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:01 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL 7:00 p.m. 3. COMMUNICATIONS 7:02 p.m. 4. APPROVE MINUTES 7:05 p.m. 5. WORK SESSION 7:10 p.m. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) 6. WORK SESSION 8:10 p.m. HIGHWAY 99W PLAN CPA2008-00011 7. OTHER BUSINESS 9:10 p.m. 8. ADJOURNMENT 9:15 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA— MARCH 2, 2009 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page lof 1 Tigard panning Commission - ttoll Call Hearing/Workshop Date: 21bc( Starting Time: Yl 0 COMMISSIONERS: Jodie Inman (President) Tom Anderson Rex Caffall Margaret Doherty Karen Fishel Stuart Hasman ✓ Matthew Muldoon 1/' Jeremy Vermilyea David Walsh STAFF PRESENT: Dick Bewersdorff Gary Pagenstecher Bunch Cheryl Caines John Floyd Jerree Lewis Duane Roberts Kim McMillan Sean Farrelly VG-us Duenas ✓Darren Wyss Phil Nachbar Marissa Daniels Todd Prager Doreen Laughlin CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes March 2, 2009 1. CALL TO ORDER President Inman called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center,Town Hall,at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: President Inman; Commissioners Doherty, Fishel, Hasman, Muldoon, and Vermilyea [arrived after roll call] Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Anderson, Caffall, Walsh, and Alternate Gaschke Staff Present: Ron Bunch, Community Development Dir.; Carissa Collins, Sr. Management Analyst; Gus Duenas, City Engineer; Darren Wyss, Sr. Planner; Doreen Laughlin, Planning Commission Secretary 3. COMMUNICATIONS—None 4. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES 2-23-09 Meeting Minutes: [Due to the short amount of time between meetings, the 2/23/09 meeting minutes will be up for consideration at the next meeting (March 16).] 5. WORK SESSION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) Ron Bunch, Community Development Director, introduced City staff member, Carissa Collins, Senior Management Analyst. He said this presentation is the introduction to the FY2009-2010 Capital Improvement Plan and if there were any questions the commissioners had that staff was unable to answer immediately, staff would get back to them. He said if any questions were to come up between now and April 20th, that the commissioners would please forward them to staff and they would then be forwarded on to Council and the Budget Committee. He stated if they wished to collectively deliberate the CIP as a body and consider it more before April 20th, staff would be glad to schedule that in. Collins stated that she was present to ask for Planning Commission input to the Budget Committee regarding this 5 year Plan. She noted the funding is $61.9 million with $23.3 funded in 09-10. She said that it is broken up into different systems: the Street system, Park system, Facilities, Downtown, Storms, and Sanitary Sewer. She went over the basic highlights of each system— some of which are: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 2,2009—Page 1 of 5 1 Burnham and Ash = $10.2 million - fully funded. PMMP [Pavement Major Maintenance Program] = $5.4 million funded over the 5 year period. She noted that's about $500,000/year and that presently there's an outreach for public input on how to determine the kind of street maintenance program we want to have. Sanitary Sewer& Storm projects are fully funded. Downtown projects are funded with grants, park SDC's, gas tax, and TIF [Tax Increment Financing] revenue. She said that so far as the Facilities System goes — the Facilities Master Plan is completed. The two primary projects are the new Police facility (about $12 million total), and the new Public Works facility (about $14 million). SOME QUESTIONS & COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS What impact will the[government]"Stimulus Package"have? Ron Bunch, Community Development Director answered: As we understand, the stimulus monies will be coming essentially in three successive waves. The first is transportation funding that will come to the state. The Metro portion of that is $30 million or so. Of that, Tigard is in line to get about 1.2 million dollars. Those monies are designated for street reconstruction or pavement management projects. Three of the projects are Bonita, 72nd, and Durham Road. Second and third rounds of stimulus will include projects that aren't quite on the line as of yet but include things such as parks, further transportation projects, water, sewer, storm drains - the kinds of things that may take a little longer to prepare. The third round, which is anticipated to come several months from now, will also include those projects that aren't really "shovel ready" and need more time to be prepared. Gus Duenas, City Engineer, spoke a bit further about the money coming through. He said what they did to get the projects out into a category in which not much red tape is involved is to do 2" overlays. He said they have to pick streets in pretty good condition. Durham from Hall Blvd to Upper Boones is one big candidate - 72" Ave and Bonita Road. He spoke a bit further about the process of receiving the stimulus funds. What is the process for prioritizing City projects in general? For street projects - what we primarily do is look at what Council goals are and what the Council mandate is. Right now it's Burnham St. and Ash St. — so that is the primary goal for now. Community Development, as a whole,will prioritize based on what Council goals are. What's being done about jaywalking near Tigard High School? Based on how long it takes to get the materials manufactured & delivered, we're looking to get a crosswalk in place by May of this year. There were some other questions regarding parks, streams, bridges, and trail repair. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 2,2009—Page 2 of 5 6. WORK SESSION HIGHWAY 99W PLAN CPA2008-00011 Darren Wyss, Senior Planner, gave his presentation on behalf of the City. He stated that the purpose of the meeting was to become familiar with the proposed amendments to Tigard's Transportation System Plan (TSP) and the Comprehensive Plan (found in attachment 1 of the Planning Commission packet). The proposed amendments would incorporate recommendations found in the Tigard 99W Plan and those made by the project's Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). The proposed amendments are divided into four components: 1. Update the Tigard Transportation System Plan to include recommended changes found in the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan; (Found in Appendix C) 2. Incorporate the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan by reference into the Tigard Transportation System Plan to serve as findings; 3. Update the recommended action measures for Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 12: Transportation to include language recommended by the Tigard 99W Plan CAC; and 4. Amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.A (under Goal 12.2) to reflect recommended 5 through lanes for Highway 99W. (Staff recommended for consistency with TSP amendments.) Wyss spent a few minutes reviewing the formulation of the Tigard 99W Plan and gave some background as to how the proposed amendments were developed. He said the development of the Tigard 99W Plan was funded by a Transportation Group Management (TGM) grant to evaluate the potential solutions to traffic congestion on Hwy 99W through Tigard. The intention of the project was to develop concept-level recommendations for transportation improvements and additional interventions to meet future needs in the Tigard 99W corridor. The development of the plan involved the traditional process of: a) Inventorying of existing conditions; b) Analyzing needs, opportunities, and constraints; c) Developing alternative improvement concepts; and d) Comparing and evaluating alternative concepts. The primary focus of these alternatives was to identify projects aimed at alleviating congestion and also improving circulation along Hwy 99W through Tigard. The planning process ended up evaluating three alternatives: A. Partial widening of Hwy 99W through Tigard; B. Access management strategies in Tigard; and C. Widening of Hwy 99W to 7 lanes through Tigard. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 2,2009—Page 3 of 5 In the end, Alternative B, which was the access management strategy, was chosen as the preferred alternative, as it best met the project objectives and criteria while carrying the fewest negative impacts to businesses in the community. Alternative B proposed that all transportation modes be enhanced though a series of projects over the long term, including medians, access management, intersection improvements, parallel roadway connections, and other off-highway improvements. This is based on maintaining a 5-lane cross section for Hwy 99W through Tigard. Wyss noted it's important to keep in mind that choosing Alternative B was not done in a vacuum. Both public involvement and interagency coordination factored into choosing the preferred alternative. The Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), City staff, and the public all agreed that Alternative B was the best solution. ODOT, TriMet, Portland, and all other partner agencies endorsed the preferred alternative. The proposed amendments found in CPA2008-00011 were developed as a result of Alternative B being chosen during the process. In addition to the recommendation found in the Plan, the CAC developed a list of its own recommendations that they wanted forwarded to Council. These recommendations are proposed as Recommended Action Measures to be added to the Comp Plan transportation chapter. The Tigard 99W Plan was completed in June 2007. In November 2007 Council directed staff to prepare amendments to implement the Tigard 99W Plan. That is the reason this portion of the meeting was scheduled. COMMENTS & QUESTIONS BY COMMISSIONERS • I'm not sold that Alternative B is the best. I'm skeptical. • Were the recommendations and changes made in this document based on Alternative B - the different language? Yes, it was. • To what extent has anyone considered tolling Hwy 99 where it enters and exits Tigard on either end? That's one way to fund it and keep the traffic down. I don't think that's going to fly. • Has it[a toll]been considered? Talked about? Vetted? It seems to me that given the very difficult issues we're facing and the fact that Tigard is more greatly impacted by 99W than any other community, that no discussion about what we're going to do with that road ought to go forward without having at least some kind of conversation about what the fiscal impacts[of a toll]are, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 2,2009—Page 4 of 5 and what the impacts are, on the volume of traffic. So there's my speech on the tolling issue. • I think what we're supposed to be doing tonight is do we have any questions or input on what's been added to the Comp Plan for transportation based on Alternative B. Are we not going to have that conversation because we're talking about something else? President Inman answered —we veered off topic a bit because I wanted to allow Commissioner Vermilyea to have his say on something he feels passionate about. There were further general questions including where a rail might be located along Hwy 99W. There was a suggestion that a "reversible lane" could possibly be put on Hwy 99W. At this point, the Commissioners went through the document (Land Use Application Narrative (proposed amendments) at length, and made various recommendations, which staff took note of. 7. OTHER BUSINESS 8. ADJOURNMENT President Inman adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. Doreen Laughlin, Planning, •mmission Secretary ATTEST: President Jodie Inman PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES—March 2,2009—Page 5 of 5 U �e �1ccutire Sun-in-vary In September 2006,the City of Tigard developed its first 5-Year Capital Improvement(CIP)Plan that determines the City's facility and capital needs for the current year and projected for four additional years. The annual CIP is updated and coordinated by the City CIP Management Team that engages all City departments,commissions,and citizens to identify needed public projects. The FY 2009-14 CIP identifies$136,233,384 in projects and funding sources for needed capital projects for the 5-year period. City facilities have proposed$29,612,724,of which$27,147,400 is unfunded and represents the acquisition and relocation of the Police and Public Works Departments. Transportation projects include the rehabilitation,construction and other improvements to public streets,roadways,and pathways. These proposed projects total$24,640,681 for the 5-year period of which$11,100,681 are funded and$13,540,000 are unfunded. The Parks System estimates $6,909,745 and includes land acquisition and development for designated park land and trails. All projects within the Parks System are fully funded. The City utilities,consisting of Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water,have proposed projects totaling$7,936,000 for the five year plan. Of this amount,$605,000 are unfunded projects. The Water System is maintained by the Public Works Department and ensures that the quality of drinking water meets or exceeds standards mandated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and the Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS). The water projects proposed for the CIP total$46,620,741. There are$22,122,513 funded projects and$24,498,228 projects that are unfunded. The City of Tigard approved the use of tax increment financing for Urban Renewal in May 2006. Those projects within the Urban Renewal section of the CIP are classified as Downtown projects. However,not all of these projects are funded with Urban Renewal dollars. Total cost of the proposed projects is$20,513,493.The Downtown Urban Renewal was created for a 20 year period. Highlights include: • Burnham St. Reconstruction and the Ash Ave. Extension which are major priorities within the Downtown System,for a total of$10,256,463. • Lake Oswego Partnership for a long term water source includes$2,900,000 that is fully funded by the Water Fund. The remaining cost of the partnership is$24,200,000,of which funding sources are currently being evaluated. • Total costs for those projects within the Downtown System that are to be funded with Urban Renewal Funds total over$12,000,000. These projects include the Fanno Creek Lower Park,Fanno Creek Plaza,and Festival Street. Funding sources for these projects are currently being evaluated. • The CIP lists a total of over$62,000,000 in unfunded projects which will be evaluated and prioritized in future years. The Capital Improvement Plan was compiled by City staff based on adopted master plans,City Council directives,public comments and requests,comments from City boards and commissions,as City o%Tiprd TIGARD Executive Summary FY 2()09-.2a-14 well as staff identified needs. The draft document will be distributed in February to the Planning Commission, City Council,and Budget Committee. It will also be placed on the City's website. The Budget Committee and City Council will consider the plan at meetings held in May and June. City nj'7 e,Jrd 1 . r T'GARD p TIGARD 2009 — 2014 Capital Improvement Plan Prepared By CIP Project Team Ron Bunch, Community Development Director Toby LaFrance, Financial &Information Services Director Dennis Koellermeier, Public Works Director Brian Rager, Assistant Public Works Director Steve Martin, Parks Supervisor .-Carissa Collins, Sr. Management Analyst Joseph Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst --__ Mark_VanDomelen, Management Analyst Gus Duenas, City Engineer __ annie Nguyen, Engineering Manager Rob Murchison, Sr. Project Engineer LoreenfMills, Assistant to the City Manager Phil Nachbar, Redevelopment Manager Tom Imdieke, Business Manager -1.ianza=Telderks, Sr. Administrative Specialist City of Tigard Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Facilities System Page Projected Number Project 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total 1-1 90160-Library Grounds Arsenic Contamination Mitigation 30,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 65,000 1-2 94040-New Police Facilities (Funded) 50,000 50,000 1-3 94040-New Police Facilities (Unfunded) 1,171,500 11,715,000 12,886,500 1-4 95030-New Public Works Facility(Funded) 500,000 500,000 1-5 95030-New Public Works Facility(Unfunded) 5,474,650 4,393,125 4,393,125 14,260,900 1-6 96230-Permit Center Exterior Walls 1,171,500 623,824 1,795,324 1-7 ???-Permit Center Roof 55,000 55,000 Total Facilities System 30,000 630,000 7,822,650 16,736,949 4,393,125 29,612,724 90160-Library Grounds Arsenic Contamination Mitigation The on-going evaluation,monitoring,and remediation of contamination to the surrounding property. Location Tigard Library ■ No Photo Available Project Manager(s) Dennis Koellermeir,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Environmental 30,000 30,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 65,000 Project Total 30,000 30,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 65,000 Project Funding Source Facilities Fund 30,000 30,000 30,000 General Fund 25,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 Project Total 30,000 30,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 65,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 1-1 94040-New Police Facility The Tigard Police Departments facility is too small and the siruation will continue to deteriorate as we expand our staff to meet the needs of the community. The current police facility was occupied in 1986 with 5,300 sq.ft. It was expanded in 1996,adding 3,000 sq.ft.At the time of the expansion,the facility was projected to be sufficient for the Police Department's needs until 2005. The projection was accurate.The building is no longer sufficient to meet our needs and has not met them for the past five years. At the time of our 1996 expansion the PD had 61 FTEs. There are now 80 1-,1 hs,8 PTEs,up to 17 volunteers and 1 intern. Because we have outgrown our current facility we are storing more equipment and evidence offsite. We also have filled a modular building behind the PD with 8 workspaces,equipment and files we are required to maintain. Due to overcrowding,the Police Department uses shared workspaces for sergeants,background investigators,patrol officers and others whenever possible. In addition,due to lack of space,we are renting 3 offsite storage units at approximately$25,000/yr. I ... r:.' ..,Ar , Location•>t.' `' .1`; To Be Determined * r,,.,,,k. i it'..* fff�rr',1.'�L,fi',''`� ,. Project Manager(s) f Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works sb: ,,s '.'''' rot let!� y .�! Funding Status• 111.111rn Funded iiiniiim Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-U 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 50,000 50,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 Project Funding Source General Fund 50,000 50,000 _ Project Total 50,000 50,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 1-2 94040-New Police Facility The Tigard Police Department's facility is too small and the situation will continue to deteriorate as we expand our staff to meet the needs of the community. The current police facility was occupied in 1986 with 5,300 sq.ft. It was expanded in 1996,adding 3,000 sq.ft.At the time of the expansion,the facility was projected to be sufficient for the Police Department's needs until 2005. The projection was accurate.The building is no longer sufficient to meet our needs and has not met them for the past five years. At the time of our 1996 expansion the PD had 61 1~1 Es. There are now 80 I.1 Es,8 PTEs,up to 17 volunteers and 1 intern. Because we have outgrown our current facility we are storing more equipment and evidence offsite. We also have filled a modular building behind the PD with 8 workspaces,equipment and files we are required to maintain. Due to overcrowding,the Police Department uses shared workspaces for sergeants,background investigators,patrol officers and others whenever possible. In addition,due to lack of space,we are renting 3 offsite storage units at approximately$25,000/yr. 5.; ' a Location °k T To Be Determined �, t rt:�#'.. __ Project Manager(s) p� ;' Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works ti ,,-1_ w- j -1 •4 Funding Status ultir A fors• Unfunded rift i. - Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 1,171,500 1,171,500 Construction 11,715,000 _ 11,715,000 Project Total 1,171,500 11,715,000 12,886,500 Project Funding Source General Fund 1,171,500 11,715,000 _ 12,886,500 Project Total 1,171,500 11,715,000 12,886,500 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 1-3 95030-New Public Works Facility The City of Tigard Public Works Department Facility Needs Analysis,dated March 29,2006,indicated the Public Works Department would need a site size of approximately 8.0 acres. The department is currently located on two separate sites:The Water Building site at 8777 SW Burnham Street and the Public Works Operations yard,located at 12800 SW Ash Avenue. Neither site is of sufficient size to consolidate the department. In addition,the Operations yard site is flagged for future development related to downtown improvements,which points toward the need to find a new site for the department. This project will also include funds for locating and purchasing an appropriate site,as well as funds for design and construction. "cyA • TYf` Location �` � To Be Determined Project Manager(s) Brian Rager,Public Works I. ' Funding Status w l Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 3,760,000 3,760,000 Design and Engineering 1,714,650 1,714,650 Construction 4,393,125 4,393,125 8,786,250 Project Total 5,474,650 4,393,125 4,393,125 14,260,900 Project Funding Source General Fund 5,474,650 4,393,125 4,393,125 14,260,900 Project Total 5,474,650 4,393,125 4,393,125 14,260,900 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 1-5 96230-Permit Center Exterior Walls Repair and repaint City Hall,Police Department,and the Permit Center. This is subject to change with the adoption of the Facilities Master Plan. 9r CSC' ; y �a. i'' - _ ; ;-Q Location li_ ; ., s ``t. 13125 SW Hall Blvd 74. t p1 ._. " Project Manager(s) `'"�- Nick Nissen,Public Works Funding Status - <--- Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-1.2 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 106,500 106,500 Construction 1,065,000 623,824 1,688,824 Project Total 1,171,500 623,824 1,795,324 Project Funding Source General Fund 1,171,500 623,824 1,795,324 Project Total 1,171,500 _ 623,824 1,795,324 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 1-6 ???-Permit Center Roof Replace membrane roof,metal roof cap,insulation and any dry rot plywood. Location 13125 SW Hall Blvd No Photo Available Project Manager(s) Nick Nissen,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction _ 55,000 55,000 Project Total 55,000 55,000 _ Project Funding Source General Fund 55,000 55,000 Project Total 55,000 55,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 1-7 City of Tigard Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Parks System Page Projected Number Project 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total 2-1 90950-Fanno Creek Trail (Hall/Fanno Cr.) 10,000 110,000 120,000 2-2 95060-Brown Property Trail Construction 24,000 259,300 271,480 554,780 2-3 95070-Cach Park Development 40,000 40,000 2-4 95080-Canterbury Acquisition&Development 171,000 307,000 234,000 140,000 147,000 999,000 2-5 95090-Entryway Monuments 95,000 117,150 124,740 336,890 2-6 95100-Cook Park Restroom Shelter 80,000 80,000 2-7 95120 Jack Park Extension 25,000 694,575 719,575 2-8 96180-Parking Lot Expansion- PC/CH 150,000 150,000 2-9 96190-Skate Park Restroom 25,000 50,000 75,000 2-10 96200-Fanno Creek Trail (Bonita&74th to Cook Park) 80,000 650,000 730,000 2-11 96210-Senn Park Trailhead 100,000 110,000 210,000 2-12 96530-Fanno Creek House (Schaltz) 115,000 158,000 136,000 409,000 2-13 96660-Tree Canopy Replacement Program 75,000 150,000 150,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 600,000 2-14 ???BPA Trail Feasibility Study 71,500 71,500 2-15 ???Community Park Acquisition&Development 1,000,000 220,000 1,220,000 2-16 ???Fanno Creek Trail (Railroad ROW Loop) 22,000 22,000 550,000 594,000 Total Parks System 640,000 3,186,025 1,136,220 237,000 324,000 1,386,500 6,909,745 90950-Fanno Creek Trail(Hall/Fanno Cr.) The new trail will begin on the east side of Hall Boulevard,then southward to just north of Fanno Creek. A wood pedestrian bridge will be installed in conjunction with this project to connect this trail and the existing trail behind the Library. The final alignment of the new trail is contingent upon the level of impact to the sensitive lands located in the trail's vicinity. Bridge materials have been purchased by the City and installation of the new bridge awaits final determination of the trail alignment. Funding provided for this project is for construction of the trail and the bridge abutments. This project is funded through Washington County's MSTIP 3 Bike/Pedestrian fund. 1 A �` '•r• / �t SS,' f Location East of Hall Blvd.&North of Fanno Creek r a r L fdni v��sM a t4,., 'jr r� "l tet f j r N :.'3,!* ,q-'-- 7,b ' 1, ?,, r i4"y(d rig r ,ar - ' � � ., ,;, ,44 - ,�,��L ��,-v�'1 Project Managers)L I . � � , :, ' ,` '�` '` i y r%A.'' y 1.1.„.. $ _ Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation 4• ,r ,-./, ' f •* `;,o � ^.,�r�1.y?�y'i��;+ Funding Status ?", . . 0_k a K . ;` -�t . „ , ; may .4.5-. . Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 275,350 10,000 110,000 120,000 Project Total 275,350 10,000 110,000 120,000 Project Funding Source General Fund 119,350 Park System Development Charge 35,880 Parks Capital Fund 120,120 10,000 110,000 120,000 Project Total 275,350 10,000 110,000 120,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-1 95060-Brown Property Trail Build Trail on Brown Property between the Tigard Library and Bonita Park on Milton Ct.to connect to Fanno Creek Trail.The Parks Capital portion of this project is reimbursed by Metro Greenspace Revenues. f > 4 �j. . Location L'.- mow _ Tigard Library to Bonita Park ;; ^ .: 4 , Project Manager(s) 16 Steve Martin,Public Works Funding Status tollirmow- x„ Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 25,000 24,000 25,000 20,000 69,000 Construction 234,300 251,480 485,780 Project Total 25,000 24,000 259,300 271,480 554,780 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 25,000 24,000 40,825 67,870 132,695 Parks Capital Fund 218,475 203,610 422,085 Project Total 25,000 24,000 259,300 271,480 554,780 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-2 _ 1 95070-Cach Park Development Community Park development on Cach property along with connection to trails on natural area. Location Sunrise Lane Project Manager(s) Steve Martin,Public Works .c. . x ^ Funding Status ss,4't 'a ya „':" h Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 40,000 40,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 16,000 16,000 Parks Capital Fund 24,000 24,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-3 95080-Canterbury Acquisition&Development The City will purchase a portion of the Tigard Water District reservoir property to develop a neighborhood park. Park development will include a playground structure,picnic shelter,basketball court,portable restroom,picnic tables,benches,garbage cans,and soft and hard surface trails. k , 6*�.. .car , _ -- _ 1. Location . , 103rd Ave.&Canterbury Ln. -(1 .,k ' ,Oxice, k" '' ,, r.d Project Manager(s) .. r;'..-. Steve Martin,Public Works ,+ P•I�t„� � '3 1 'fit- , .' *'-. �, 4.11 i rw ' - '" ► k -. :�'' °` Funding Status Fully Funded --yam Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 26,930 140,000 45,000 128,940 234,000 146,162 155,663 709,765 Construction 400,000 126,000 178,060 304,060 Project Total 26,930 _ 540,000 171,000 307,000 234,000 146,162 155,663 1,013,825 Project Funding Source Parks Capital Fund 26,930 Park System Development Charge 217,400 68,000 123,000 94,000 58,465 62,265 405,730 General Fund 322,600 103,000 184,000 140,000 87,697 93,398 608,095 Project Total 26,930 540,000 171,000 307,000 234,000 146,162 155,663 1,013,825 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-4 95090-Entryway Monuments Build monument signs for Tigard entryway portals. The City will add two monument signs in FY 09-10,and one monument sign and the landscaping of the large area around an existing sign in FY 10-11. 11 1* 5' TIGARD ,T. _,,, Location tea.�:=.�°^ F To Be Determined � Project Manager(s) - Steve Martin,Public Works K,4 e. � Funding Status ` s e+' y Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 _ 20.1.3-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 16,500 13,400 29,900 Construction 27,884 95,000 95,000 100,650 111,340 306,990 Project Total 27,884 95,000 95,000 117,150 124,740 336,890 Project Funding Source Parks Capital Fund 27,884 95,000 General Fund 95,000 117,150 124,740 _ 336,890 Project Total 27,884 95,000 95,000 117,150 124,740 336,890 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-5 95100-Cook Park Restroom Shelter Replace bathroom and rehabilitate shelter#1 at Cook Park. These facilites are more than 15 years old and are in very poor condition. The old restrooms will be replaced and the present shelter will be rehabilitated.Both share the same building structure. This project will separate the two facilities. ; yes or • d.. �• a Location ti Cook Park A ' Project Manager(s) Steve Martin,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 80,000 80,000 Project Total _ 80,000 80,000 Project Funding Source General Fund 80,000 80,000 Project Total 80,000 80,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-6 95120 Jack Park Extension Purchase and develop approximately 2-acres on Walnut Street adjacent to Jack Park per agreement with TVF&R This park will continue to serve the residents living in the vicinity of Jack Park. The development to occur on the site consists of turf areas,parking,playgroung structure,trail,and bridge to cross the creek. t-Z..-.017,: •-..3-.:0t. t : ., --,:ft _, '. ••- i ,� . , k Location 'rill'" '-• 41' k1,+F ' •' .'#� - , ,4 TVF&R Fire Station on Walnut St. F . i'; ._ :,,r.,,. ..,.,�. ,." Project Manager(s) f ..q � .,4w. t -.� y `r N • 7 �„ 4. Steve Martin,Public Works ; ,#, ,..1,"4-.;: 41„' x i r i.-.('`S ^ �: � ' ;v b ,+ x Funding Status Fully Funded_, . % r 4 cig,. Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 481,000 481,000 Design and Engineering 25,000 25,000 37,275 62,275 Construction 176,300 _ 176,300 Project Total 25,000 25,000 694,575 719,575 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 10,000 10,000 277,830 287,830 General Fund 15,000 15,000 416,745 431,745 Project Total 25,000 25,000 694,575 719,575 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-7 96180-Parking Lot Expansion-Permit Center/City Hall Addition of 20 to 25 spaces to the City Hall/Permit Center parking lot to compensate for those spaces lost to skate park construction. • • � � ` = fix• _ s4*. Location 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Project Manager(s) Steve Martin,Public Works . -• Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 150,000 _ 150,000 Project Total 150,000 150,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 100,000 100,000 General Fund 50,000 50,000 Project Total 150,000 150,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-g 96190-Skate Park Restroom An ADA accessible,unisex restroom will be constructed near the Skate Park. A drinking fountain will also be installed. 44.x., ---_ Location • t 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Project Manager(s) Steve Martin,Public Works Funding Status .._ Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 25,000 25,000 25,000 Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 Project Total 75,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 75,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 Project Total 75,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 P Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-9 P 96200-Fanno Creek Trail(Bonita&74th to Cook Park) Continue construction of the Fanno Creek Trail between Bonita Road and Cook Park on 74th right-of-way and/or Fanno corridor. F . agr ++fir •r f At As' Location Bonita Rd.to Cook Park _ Project Manager(s) - : � Steve Martin,Public Works - - , Funding Status Fully Funded v «`.y '' Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 40,000 40,000 Design and Engineering 40,000 40,000 Construction 650,000 650,000 Project Total 80,000 650,000 730,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 20,000 162,500 182,500 General Fund _ 60,000 487,500 547,500 Project Total 80,000 650,000 730,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-10 96210-Senn Park Trailhead Develop trailhead for Senn property with small playground,shelter etc. Location " '.. , 9852 SW 74th Ave. o 4 x Project Manager(s) Steve Martin,Public Works w Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction _ 149,500 100,000 110,000 210,000 Project Total 149,500 100,000 110,000 210,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 34,500 25,000 27,500 52,500 General Fund 115,000 75,000 82,500 157,500 Project Total 149,500 100,000 110,000 210,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-11 96530-Fanno Creek House(Schaltz) Landscape property around Schaltz House. / . tip, �. r Location l y-t I 13335 SW Hall Blvd. '.77:441t4.2441 •o - ' Project Manager(s) , r°'�n" �krk; f ' �1r i, 1 ' Steve Martin,Public Works :. . Funding Status Fully Funded .4-:-.''s_-..—!e- ._ �may..- -'�4..$+use;�Y..z'? S '�-. ..st`a.L..Y Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 10,000 36,000 46,000 Construction 135,000 115,000 148,000 100,000 363,000 Project Total 135,000 115,000 158,000 136,000 409,000 Project Funding Source General Fund 135,000 115,000 158,000 136,000 409,000 Project Total 135,000 115,000 158,000 136,000 409,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-12 96660-Tree Canopy Replacement Program The City of Tigard collects funds from developers who remove trees and are unable to meet replacement requirements. This program utilizes the tree replacement fund for planting trees,thereby replacing lost tree canopy. Annually,the City will deliver and plant free street trees in the Fall/Winter for eligible Tigard residents requesting trees. After the free street tree program is completed in the Spring,the City will then pursue a large scale planting opportunity in stream corridors,on school grounds,along highways,or where canopy replacement is needed. Funds will also be used to maintain prior planting during an establishment period. Location Various Photo goes here Project Manager(s) Todd Prager,Community Development Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 45,000 45,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 165,000 Construction 75,000 75,000 105,000 105,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 435,000 Project Total 75,000 75,000 150,000 150,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 600,000 Project Funding Source Tree Replacement Fund 75,000 75,000 150,000 150,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 _ 600,000 Project Total 75,000 75,000 150,000 150,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 600,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-13 ???-BPA Trail Feasibility Study Acquire right of way and preplan for Powerline Trail that extends from Barrows Road to Beef Bend Road. Location Bonneville&PGE Powerline No Photo Available Project Manager(s) Steve Martin,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 45,000 45,000 Design and Engineering 26,500 26,500 Project Total 71,500 71,500 Project Funding Source Parks Capital Fund 53,625 53,625 Park System Development Charge 17,875 17,875 Project Total 71,500 71,500 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-14 ???-Community Park Acquisition&Development Acquire land for a Community Park in Tigard including the development of fields and play areas. Location To Be Determined Project Manager(s) No Photo Available Steve Martin,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 1,000,000 1,000,000 Design and Engineering 30,000 30,000 Construction 190,000 190,000 Project Total 1,000,000 220,000 1,220,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 500,000 220,000 720,000 Parks Capital Fund 500,000 500,000 Project Total 1,000,000 220,000 1,220,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-15 ???-Fanno Creek Trail(Railroad ROW Loop) Develop Trail on railroad right-of-way from downtown to Fanno Creek Trail at Tigard Street. This project develops a loop for the Fanno Creek Trail in the downtown area. Location Bonita Rd. to Cook Park Project Manager(s) No Photo Available Steve Martin,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 22,000 22,000 44,000 Construction 550,000 550,000 _ Project Total 22,000 22,000 550,000 594,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 5,500 5,500 137,500 148,500 General Fund _ 16,500 16,500 412,500 445,500 Project Total 22,000 22,000 550,000 594,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 2-16 City of Tigard Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Sanitary Sewer System Page Projected Number Project 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total 3-1 90280-Sanitary Sewer Master Plan 70,000 81,000 151,000 3-2 95150-Bonita Rd. at Milton Ct.-Pipe Removal 10,000 35,000 45,000 3-3 95160-Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program 1,050,000 1,300,000 1,000,000 800,000 4,150,000 3-4 95190-Hunziker St.Sanitary Sewer Replacement 60,000 60,000 3-5 95210-Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 3-6 95830-Commercial St. Sanitary Sewer 25,000 25,000 3-7 ???-Fanno Creek Slope Stabilization 50,000 200,000 250,000 3-8 ???-Sanitary Sewer Line Replacement Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Total Sanitary Sewer System 1,180,000 1,676,000 1,350,000 950,000 150,000 175,000 5,481,000 90280-Sanitary Sewer Master Plan This project is carried over from FY 2008-09.The master plan will recommend rehabilitation,expansion and replacement projects over the next 20 years that will guide the preparation of the 5-year Capital Improvement Program and identify projects for the subsequent 15 years. It will be a separate plan prepared by a consultant hired by CWS to update the 2000 Sewer Master Plan Update,which is the current basin-wide plan.The agreement with CWS to prepare the plan has a total contract amount of$151,000. The 2000 Sewer Master Plan Update identified nine City sewers with suspected sewer capacity deficiencies.In addition,City staff has identified three other areas that may also have inadequate capacity. CWS has installed flow monitoring stations at all of these locations and has recorded sewer flows to determine the extent of the capacity deficiencies. The remaining portion of the contract is included in FY 2009-10 for the consultant to use the results of the flow monitoring to prepare a final master plan with recommendations to correct the deficiencies. Location N/A No Photo Available Project Manager(s) Greg Berry,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 70,000 81,000 151,000 Project Total 70,000 81,000 151,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer 70,000 81,000 _ 151,000 Project Total 70,000 81,000 151,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-1 95150-Bonita Rd.at Milton Ct.-Pipe Removal Project Description:This project is carried over from FY 2008-09.A portion of the abandonned sanitary sewer pipe crossing Fanno Creek near the intersection of Bonita Road and Milton Court needs to be removed from the creek.The pipe has obstructed high flow and debris has been caught between the pipe and the water surface when the high flow recedes.The removal has to be during the in-water work period between July 1 and September 30 to meet environmental permit requirements. • Location Milton Ct. 1 , .. Project Manager(s) ' " \ Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status .g!, 6 - � ;'y Fully Funded pis_ -i.,: JIM ,. Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 358 35,000 10,000 35,000 45,000 Project Total 358 35,000 10,000 35,000 45,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer 358 35,000 10,000 35,000 45,000 Project Total 358 35,000 10,000 35,000 45,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-2 95160-Citywide Sanitary Sewer Extension Program The Sanitary Sewer Extension Program began in FY 2001-02 in order to extend sewers to all developed but un-served residential areas Citywide.The City uses the formation of reimbursement districts to construct the sewers.The program has been extended due to the number of districts that can be constructed each fiscal year.The Commercial Area Sewer Extension Program is also funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund and offers commercial entities the opportunity to participate in reimbursement districts for extension of sewer service to commercial areas. ' �.r-t � Fj �►gyp Location Various :kit, r 5 � rt .. •'* 1.4 Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation :._ � �' Funding Status _� .e"31,:t Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 150,000 Construction 743,451 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,300,000 1,000,000 800,000 4,150,000 Project Total 743,451 1,200,000 1,050,000 1,300,000 1,000,000 800,000 4,150,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer 743,451 1,200,000 1,050,000 1,300,000 1,000,000 800,000 4,150,000 Project Total 743,451 1,200,000 1,050,000 1,300,000 1,000,000 800,000 4,150,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-3 95190-Hunziker St.Sanitary Sewer Replacement A section of the sanitary sewer pipe on Hunziker Street immediately east of Hall Blvd was broken by the excavation for a duct bank.A temporary repair was made by Public Works in the summer of 2008.However,the repair material has been deteriorated,which causes blockage to the sewer flow.This project will replace 320 feet of the pipe, install one new manhole at the intersection with Hall Blvd and reconnect three service laterals.The existing pipe will be abandonned in place.An ODOT permit will be required as the construction will also take place on Hall Blvd,which is under the jurisdiction of the State.The pipe replacement schedule will be in conjunction with the overlay planned for Hunziker Street at this location. ~� Location ;c , . 9 ; `fa`' ., 1. 6 3*.t. " East of Hall Blvd. �. @ @jj '" 2 Project Manager(s) ri.� Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation m f = � .'r ` Funding Status 1 r f '..6 Fully Funded .rr .- J'E ^' y U , w Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 10,000 10,000 Construction 50,000 50,000 Project Total 60,000 60,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer _ 60,000 60,000 Project Total 60,000 60,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-4 95210-Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program The Sanitary Sewer Fund will be used to contract out sewer repair projects that are beyond the repair capabilities of the City's Public Works Department.This program is intended to be a continuing program of preventative maintenance. This program will avoid restoration costs that could be several times higher.The Sanitary Sewer Major Maintenance Program will include sewer repair projects located at various locations in the City. r A c ¢;, Location ,L., 't Various • w, Project Manager(s) .• :�_ # Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation , .,-.,-• '4. Funding Status Fully Funded .. r 1 I ti , Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 15,182 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 _ 50,000 50,000 300,000 Project Total 15,182 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer 15,182 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Project Total 15,182 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-5 95830-Commercial St.Sanitary Sewer This project replaces approximately 50 feet of a damaged pipe on Commercial Street between Lincoln and Main Street that has caused frequent infiltration. The design has been completed.The construction will be in coordination with the Commercial Street Sidewalk Improvements proposed for FY 2013-14. if4t Noi, 3 e s: 'i \� �.. �', ',� 1.•�q��,�,� �`, Location , j, �4t; E L:.:,. y Between Lincoln&Main St. I 'i - Project Manager(s) i_ Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation ry'- Funding Status Fully Funded 12/03/2008 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 25,000 25,000 Project Total 25,000 25,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer 25,000 25,000 Project Total 25,000 25,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-6 ???-Fanno Creek Slope Stabilization The Fanno Creek bank near Arthur Court has been eroded since the winter of 2009 due to high water levels of the creek. The erosion has damaged the outfall of a storm line and is threatening a sewer main near the creek bank. A portion of the Fanno Creek trail that runs along the top of the bank may also be undermined if the erosion is not addressed properly. This project provides funding to perform emergency repair work including design and stabilization of approximately 250 feet of bank to protect the sanitary sewer main in place. 'lit -.1S--- -. ' R: Location _ .n ,',- .- .✓ 4,.r Arthur Court• a ,t ,f, +t .- .:,",....-4-_.-:. 4`'"K ' X ( ' `k� �4► '. Project Manager(s),, �` .- '�t. u` . Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation � -4"-. ..,'F.-` -;,": Jy„ d, - ;! Funding Status tea• Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 50,000 50,000 Construction 200,000 200,000 Project Total 50,000 200,000 250,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer 50,000 200,000 250,000 Project Total 50,000 200,000 250,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-7 ???-Sanitary Sewer Line Replacement Program This on-going program consists of the replacement of leaking, damaged,and older sewer lines throughout the sanitary sewer system. These line sections are identified via the City's annual T.V. inspection and cleaning programs. The goal of this investment program is to prevent failure of the sewer system due to structural failure or loss of adequate capacity due to groundwater intrusion. - Location Various v . = 'b Project Manager(s) F _ _ ~'1' fr.• J" Dennis Koellermeier Public Works . • -,-.Z._.. _.----.ms' ■ ^-.-.�__w !l- ,� ., Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Project Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Project Funding Source Sanitary Sewer 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Project Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 3-8 City of Tigard Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Storm System Page Projected Number Project 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total 4-1 90350-Storm Drainage Major Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 4-2 90430-Water Quality Facility Enhancement 25,000 130,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 275,000 4-3 95220-Culvert Replacement(72nd/Dartmouth) 25,000 75,000 100,000 4-4 95230-Regional Stormwater Treatment Facility(Commercial St.) 375,000 375,000 4-5 95240-Community Tree Planting 40,000 35,000 35,000 110,000 4-6 95290-Riparian Restoration&Enhancement 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 4-7 95310-Slope Stabilization (Derry Dell Cr. @ 118th) 100,000 100,000 200,000 4-8 96330-Greenburg Rd.Storm Drainage Improvements 20,000 130,000 150,000 4-9 96450-Culvert&Outfall Improvements (In House Construction) 40,000 70,000 40,000 65,000 40,000 40,000 295,000 4-10 96730-Culvert Improvements-Walnut St. (Derry Dell Cr./Fanno Cr.) 10,000 75,000 200,000 285,000 4-11 ???-Japanese Baptist Area Outfall Retrofit 5,000 10,000 35,000 50,000 4-12 ???-Tree Planting Summer Creek(116th to 113th) 40,000 40,000 4-13 ???-Tree Planting Summer Creek(121st to Mary Woodward 60,000 60,000 Elementary) 4-14 ???-Tree Planting Summer Creek(Mary Woodward Elementary to Summerlake Park) 50,000 50,000 4-15 ???-Copper Creek Bank Stabilization 30,000 75,000 105,000 Total Storm System 320,000 640,000 475,000 240,000 165,000 615,000 2,455,000 90350-Storm Drainage Major Maintenance This yearly program addresses minor storm drainage problems requiring more than normal maintenance effort by the City's Public Works department.The Storm Drainage Major Maintenance Program includes projects located at various locations in the City. Location Various No Photo Available Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 10,000 Construction 7,960 _ 40,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Project Total 7,960 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Project Funding Source Storm Water 7,960 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Project Total 7,960 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-1 90430-Water Quality Facility Enhancement The projects under this program are focused on systematically upgrading existing water quality facilities that have deteriorated over the years.The funding will be from the non- SDC portion of the Water Quality/Quantity Fund.The amount allocated for each fiscal year should be able to address one or more projects annually.Some of the projects that have been identified for implementation during the 5-year plan period are as follows:Water Quality Facility#12 (8865 SW Greensward)-Rebuild the out flow structure with a smaller lumped slant grate.The current structure is severely cracked in four places and in danger of coming apart.Water Quality Facility#31 (Cole Ln.)-Reinforce the west bank with gabion rock and turf mat to stop erosion problem.Water Quality Facility#007 (NW corner of intersection SW Walnut& 135th Ave)-Installation of irrigation, native plants,and fencing in order to enhance aesthetics of water quality facility and improve storm water treatment.Water Quality Facility#6 (Walnut @ Wilton)-Install fencing and replant area with native plants that was repaired during the summer of 2008.Water Quality Facility#8 (Walnut& 135th)-Replace dead trees,extend existing irrigation and install fencing,trash cans,and dog waste containers at this location.Water Quality Facility#22(fall Wood Dr.)-Install fencing,remove silt from pond and replant trees and shrubs at this location. t. ;-i :+ Location .,. •. Various .4..--. ` Project Manager(s) `"`. y� ^'1A"4� +'-, Brian Wheatley,Public Works > Funding Status Fully Funded 'QA.-ius`�:a .. "1....tom`i -.---, -, < w.7. Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 3,476 180,000 25,000 130,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 275,000 Project Total 3,476 180,000 25,000 130,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 275,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 3,476 180,000 25,000 130,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 275,000 Project Total 3,476 180,000 25,000 130,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 275,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-2 95220-Culvert Replacement(72nd/Dartmouth) The project upgrades an existing culvert located at the 72nd Avenue and Dartmouth Streets intersection to provide additional culvert capacity to relieve flooding and stop creek incision. Implementation of the project addresses culvert replacement goals identified in the Healthy Streams Plan. The design of the upgrade will be combined with the 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth intersection design. The City intends to work with private developers to complete improvements to the intersection and upgrade the culvert. k',-" ..h 4 .-J r "- , y""',. -r, ', 4"'it -ti VN Location i "'�; r�i ' x :� � r� Red Rock Creek at 72nd Ave. jr -„�' fje'� , :T r ,, ?- Project Manager(s) r "`l'` `� ,n - }ry=. - . Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation M . " *. � „t>`~, T74i. 4 1 t` II' Funding Status �- ::467^- 1_,,_ � (+ J Fully Funded , � �te''>.,. '7C, L _.�. t .,.,=•244:04'",..4-.....„--..&--. f^r• �n....- N ..: Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 1,720 25,000 25,000 _ 75,000 100,000 Project Total 1,720 25,000 25,000 75,000 100,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 1,720 25,000 25,000 75,000 100,000 Project Total 1,720 25,000 25,000 75,000 100,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-3 95230-Regional Stormwater Treatment Facility(Commercial St.) This project constructs a regional storm water detention facility that would treat approximately 40 acres of storm water in and around the downtown Tigard area. Project design has been completed as part of the Commercial St. Improvements. The project will accomplish the outfall retrofit goal of the Healthy Streams Plan authored by Clean Water Services and will be constructed with Commercial Street Improvements. =.S■i • L.,5 1 Location Commercial St.near RR tracks Project Manager(s)anni 3 It Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation X guy P P Carla Staedter,Public Works ? r; . „ y ': • . Funding Status y Fully Funded NitiVci.,Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 27,069 375,000 375,000 Project Total 27,069 375,000 375,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 27,069 375,000 402,069 Project Total 27,069 375,000 402,069 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-4 95240-Community Tree Planting The City of Tigard will plant native trees and shrubs along creeks and streams in the city to meet the Community Tree Planting goals identified in the Healthy Streams Plan. ip � Z-7=:. - c • Nii 4.-, [c' `-�+ " ykl �3 1: -,+Ai . N'' _ ,r. 4 . ,� -4 .- ,"I Location a .. Is ; 4 i ' ,, x y <vot • _ Various ,.� � t i. ._ F`-...`,,.,fit',- K A„�k Project Manager(s) • ` }r E v err Carla Staedter,Public Works T'�' ��- Funding Status • 4...2— =d`‘ ' Fully Funded { a• Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 40,000 40,000 35,000 35,000 110,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 _ 35,000 35,000 110,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 40,000 40,000 35,000 35,000 110,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 35,000 35,000 110,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-5 95290-Riparian Restoration&Enhancement This fund will be available for urban forestry projects within riparian corridors. The fund will also pay for any necessary replanting in the event past riparian restoration projects experience high mortality rates. li 1:77.11mgirli.31,r51 Firfo ist Location " _ �. Various x., Project Manager(s) Carla Staedter,Public Works / 4 _ `r 1 Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 6,049 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 Project Total 6,049 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 6,049 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 Project Total 6,049 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-6 95310-Slope Stabilization(Deny Dell Creek at 118th) In September 2006,the City discovered slope erosion and bank stability-related issues occurring at two locations in the vicinity of Derry Dell Creek and 118th Avenue.A geotechnical study was conducted to determine reasons for the erosion and recommend slope stabilization techniques that would prevent the slope from continuing to erode. The first location near 13890 SW 118th Ave has been stabilized using a technique that includes rock buttress,planting,and re-directing stormwater. Repair of the second location further downstream of Derry Dell Creek is planned for the summer of 2009. 7 4 ice.. w�•' ... : �, ` , $ Location I:, t" ti �i - Deny Dell Creek and 118th Ave. r : °� 1 „rs .% Project Manager(s) �► r Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation iR Funding Status ;� el a` ilk 4g. Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 150,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 Project Total 150,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 Project Funding Source Storm Water 150,000 100,000 100,000 _ _ 200,000 Project Total 150,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-7 96330-Greenburg Rd. Storm Drainage Improvements The exisitng storm drainage sytem in the vicinity of Greenburg Road and Cascade Ave is sub-standard in size and slope creating water backup in catch basins and ditches. In addition,there are at least two pipes that have reversed slopes or do not have an outlet for water to escape.This project re-routes the existing system by installing new pipes and abandonning existing pipes that do not properly function.The project is carried over from FY 2008-09 when the design and weland permitting were completed.Traffic on Greenburg Road is anticipated to be slightly impacted during the construction. - r -:l : , . -,4 Location y= At Cascade Ave. . ® fi I.! r = Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation ti Funding Status Fully Funded tt , Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 150,000 20,000 130,000 150,000 Project Total 150,000 20,000 130,000 150,000 Project Funding Source Storm Water 150,000 20,000 130,000 _ 150,000 Project Total 150,000 20,000 130,000 150,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-8 96450-Culvert&Outfall Improvements (In House Construction) This project provides funding to complete culvert and outfall retrofitting using on-call consultants to assist with design and permitting and using our stormwater crews to complete construction of the projects. Projects to be completed in FY 2009-10 include removal of a culvert on Derry Dell Creek upstream of Eden Court and repair of an outfall to Deny Dell Creek upstream of 118th. Projects for subsequent years will be identified and completed as crew time allows and based on prioritization discussed in the Healthy Streams Plan. This project meets the goals of the Healthy Streams Plan culvert replacements and outfall retrofitting. Location Various Project Manager(s) No Photo Available Carla Staedter,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 25,000 25,000 50,000 Construction 40,000 40,000 45,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 245,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 70,000 40,000 65,000 40,000 40,000 295,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 40,000 40,000 70,000 40,000 65,000 40,000 40,000 295,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 70,000 40,000 65,000 40,000 40,000 295,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-9 96730-Culvert Improvements-Walnut St. (Derry Dell/Fanno Cr.) This project increases capacity,provides fish passage,and enhances water quality for the existing culvert on Walnut Street at Derry Dell Creek and for another culvert near the conjunction of Deny Dell and Fanno Creeks.The funding will be used for hydrologic analysis,hydraulic study and preliminary design.In order to minimize impacts to adjacent private properties,the Walnut Street cuvert will not be designed to accommodate the ultimate width of the street.The culvert exension will be addressed in the design for Walnut Street Improvements between Tiedeman Ave. and Hwy 99W in the future.This project also addresses the Healthy Stream Plan proposed by Clean Water Services. F .t. . - Location = Derry Dell Cr.Under Walnut St. \ . Project Manager(s) rf Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation �, Carla Staedter,Public Works 'ax ;„'� h Funding Status Fully Funded ✓ i . Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 31,414 75,000 10,000 75,000 85,000 Construction 200,000 200,000 Project Total 31,414 75,000 10,000 75,000 200,000 285,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 31,414 75,000 10,000 75,000 200,000 285,000 Project Total 31,414 75,000 10,000 75,000 200,000 285,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-10 ???-Japanese Baptist Area Outfall Retrofit This project constructs a stormwater treatment facility at the end of Steve Street on Church property. The project was identified by Clean Water Services as NPDES Outfall ID: 16792 and is a 36 inch pipe draining approx.24 acres of untreated stormwater. The project shows up under CWS prioritization as number 4 in the region to be retrofitted. e ' F = Location .. End of Steve St. " - �� Project Manager(s) xll�t i ..t .. Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation _ ', .., 0 ac 1- 1.. -e-•�. ,--- Funding Status �� w Fully Funded r Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 2,500 2,500 Design and Engineering 2,500 10,000 12,500 Construction 35,000 35,000 Project Total 5,000 10,000 35,000 50,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 5,000 10,000 35,000 50,000 Project Total 5,000 10,000 35,000 50,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-11 ???-Tree Planting Summer Creek(116th to 113th) Projects tentatively slated for stream corridor restoration in fiscal year 2009-10 include Summer Creek(between 116th Avenue and 113th Place)and an un-named tributary to Summer Creek(located in a city owned greenbelt between Tippet and Walnut Streets). The projects will remove non-native vegetation and install 8,000 native trees and shrubs restoring 5.34 acres of riparian corridor. The proposed projects will meet a Community Tree Planting goal identified in the Healthy Streams plan and will provide a potential stream buffer mitigation area on the parcel near Tippett Drive. The locations for planting sites listed above are subject to change pending new restoration opportunities or partnerships that would warrant a more accelerated schedule. .,"r rf "° _L i. ?' _^. ' f •_. Location _„ _, 411.44S�-.-'r.r' r�s �� ,.. Summer Cr.Between 116th& 113th 1 t. A* q rt r � Y „ lk �,. Project Manager(s) s '' �., � ° '; j Carla Staedter,Public Works 1,z' " ' *4 - Funding Status - :., r -w; Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 40,000 40,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 40,000 40,000 Project Total 40,000 40,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-12 ???-Tree Planting Summer Creek(121st to Mary Woodward Elementary) Projects tentatively slated for stream corridor restoration in fiscal year 2010-11 include Summer Creek from 121st Avenue to Mary Woodward Elementary,a tributary to Summer Creek located next to the entry drive to Mary Woodward school,and a Summer Creek tributary which crosses under Gaarde Street. These projects will remove non- native vegetation and install 15,000 native trees and shrubs. These tree plantings which will restore 16.03 acres of riparian corridor will meet a Community Tree Planting goal identified in the Healthy Streams plan and will provide a potential stream buffer mitigation area on the parcels which front Gaarde Street. The locations for planting sites listed above are subject to change pending new restoration opportunities or partnerships that would warrant a more accelerated schedule. Location w 4'' • xa '' k Summer Cr.Between 121st&Elementary School ,o _ as r , _ - ' AP. , i u :ae: F,A,tr, , :,,Sn.�„;i ; Project Manager(s) a..F, - ? �e" ri�„� �` Carla Staedter,Public Works n r ,' ' a� ,a Funding Status ' - }` i 4 7 -'t o Fully Funded r w = 'F e' t 5 r i Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 - 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 60,000 60,000 Project Total 60,000 60,000 Project Funding Source Water Quality/Quantity 60,000 60,000 Project Total 60,000 60,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-13 ???-Tree Planting Summer Creek(Mary Woodward Elementary to Summerlake Park) Projects tentatively slated for stream corridor restoration in fiscal year 2011-12 include Summer Creek between Marywoodward Elementary and Summerlake Park. The projects will remove non-native vegetation and install 10,000 native trees and shrubs restoring 7.29 acres of riparian corridor. The proposed projects will meet a Community Tree Planting goal identified in the Healthy Streams plan. The locations for planting sites listed above are subject to change pending new restoration opportunities or partnerships that would warrant a more accelerated schedule. '—. , l': �: Y",-„,,;:., ' ri Vii. d r i -irtm, r,' c6.: r as t' '7 E:' ., P ),, g ,,b. 1:''' 1 .” .I '-. rte -,--'."-r r 1'^r " ,. . Location 40.0,0 t ....P-'I `" Summer Cr.Between Mary Wookward at Summerlake Park 7, ' W Y +f 't i t -{ •y� A - r;. ..T .'�L tyrmrP ,�-� .�Y�''i �11,f9pq'Q;IE Se.. �. f f awe 1 V ,�•. Project Manager(s) l* i , r �? n � as � Carla Staedter,Public Works � PI:-i? z. .t, ' ,['Y"."s 0,�a.a€w ..,' „p. "i'^ifr.. �. r sL oaf ± ' F: Funding Status z, t' , " .-Y '''0 ' . :c td' Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 50,000 50,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 Project Funding Source Water Q>>ality/Quantity 50,000 50,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-14 ???-Copper Creek Bank Stabilization The banks of Copper Creek at the southwest corner of Durham Road and Copper Creek Drive has been eroded due to heavy rain and high stream flow from a 36-culvert under the streets.This project provides funding to perform preliminary design and wetland permitting in FY 2009-10;and final design and construction in FY 2010-11.The work will include bank stabilization,culvert repair,energy dissipation,and planting which will be required by wetland permits. z ,'. .x ir Location 1 , - Durham Rd.&Copper Creek Dr. J• ': 4 .00 Project Manager(s) ,tI r A' s Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation tea+ •r r ` ! �' :A `4 •_ 1 __ Funding Status mot.. : kW ;- , Unfunded . .A�'l•ten .}�-�_: Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 30,000 30,000 Construction _ 75,000 75,000 Project Total 30,000 75,000 105,000 Project Funding Source Storm Water 30,000 75,000 105,000 Project Total 30,000 75,000 105,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 4-15 City of Tigard Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Street System Page Projected Number Project 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total 5-1 90440-Pavement Major Maintenance Program 935,511 910,000 910,000 910,000 910,000 910,000 5,485,511 5-2 90660-Hall Blvd.Half-Street Improvements 225,000 25,000 250,000 5-3 90770-Greenburg Rd./Hwy 99W/Main St. Intersection Improvements 970,000 1,210,000 2,783,000 4,963,000 5-4 95350-100th Ave.Improvements (Sattler to Lady Marion) 40,000 225,000 265,000 5-5 95410-72nd Improvements(Dartmouth St.to Hwy 99W) 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 5-6 95450-121st Improvements(Walnut St. to North Dakota) 75,000 300,000 375,000 5-7 95460-121st Improvements (Whistler to Tippitt) 400,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,400,000 5-8 95470-72nd Improvements (Bonita Rd. to Hunziker) 300,000 300,000 5-9 95480-72nd Improvements (Hunziker to Dartmouth) 400,000 400,000 5-10 95490-92nd Sidewalk(Durham Rd. to Cook Park) 75,000 400,000 475,000 5-11 95500-Dartmouth St.Improvements (72nd to 68th Ave.) 300,000 500,000 800,000 5-12 95520-Hall Blvd.Right-Turn Lane 75,000 75,000 250,000 400,000 5-13 95540-N.Dakota Pedestrian Bridge 75,000 200,000 275,000 5-14 95550-N.Dakota Street Improvements (Greenburg Rd.to 95th Ave.) 25,000 100,000 125,000 5-15 95560-Walnut St.Improvements (116th to Tiedeman) 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,500,000 5-16 95910-Crosswalk(Hall Blvd./Fanno Creek) 2,000 100,000 102,000 5-17 95920-Main St.Traffic Signal 25,000 150,000 175,000 5-18 95980-Tigard Triangle Local Improvement District 75,000 2,175,000 2,250,000 5-19 96280-Sidewalk(Hall Blvd./Bonita Rd to 600'N) 30,000 306,566 336,566 5-20 96400-Greenburg Rd.Improvements (North Dakota to Shady Lane) 40,000 135,000 175,000 5-21 96710-Crosswalk&Lighting System-Durham Rd.at Tigard High School 60,000 5,000 65,000 5-22 ???-Barrows Rd.Bridge Repair 50,000 50,000 5-23 ???-Barrows Rd.Sidewalk Installation 71,814 71,814 5-24 ???-Garrett St.Sidewalk 141,790 141,790 5-25 ???-Citywide Pedestrian/Sidewalk Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 5-26 ???-Tiedeman Ave.Traffic Signal&Northbound Left-Turn Lane 110,000 300,000 410,000 5-27 ???-Walnut St.Signal&Westbound Right-Turn Lane 50,000 350,000 400,000 Total Street System 2,072,511 5,485,170 5,553,000 3,485,000 3,685,000 4,360,000 24,640,681 95910-Crosswalk(Hall Blvd./Fanno Creek) This project provides funding for the crosswalk light on Hall Blvd that may not be completed due to the amount of time required to order and install the lighting equipment beginning in spring or late spring of 2009. This project is funded through Washington County's MSTIP 3 Bike/Pedestrian fund. plpr, , .1 ' :FIX, . - iiiirT75..,: -,,, :,-, r Location At Fanno Creek Pathway Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 80,000 2,000 100,000 102,000 Project Total 80,000 2,000 100,000 102,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 80,000 2,000 100,000 102,000 Project Total 80,000 2,000 100,000 102,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-1 90660-Hall Blvd. Half-Street Improvements Hall Blvd is a state-owned highway and is classified as arterial.This project widens Hall Blvd on the east side of the street from the existing Fanno Creek Bridge to approximately 450 feet north.The current northbound travel lane,which is less than 12 feet,will be widened to 12 feet.The narrow roadway shoulder will be widened to provide space for a 6-foot bike lane.The new sidewalk will be installed at the ultimate location where it may be retained for future street improvements.Mitigation of the storm water generated by the additional impervious area will also be addressed in the project.The existing bridge will not be widened as part of this project. Location Y: r r , ' *� tu �,. ry'' Far=Creek to 450'north �,-,fi I Project Manager(s) T-- 'lit -4' t Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation -- I _. __ - Funding Status Unfunded w"=r Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 25,000 25,000 Construction _ 200,000 25,000 225,000 Project Total 225,000 25,000 250,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 225,000 25,000 250,000 _ Project Total 225,000 25,000 250,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-2 90770-Greenburg Rd./Hwy 99W/Main St. Intersection Improvements The existing intersection of Highway 99W with Greenburg Road and Main Street and the Highway 99W intersection with Hall Boulevard are the most highly congested intersections in the City. Capacity improvements to the Highway 99W/Hall Boulevard intersection are funded through Washington County's MSTIP 3 program and the project is in the design stage for construction sometime in 2008. The improvements to the Hall Boulevard/99W intersection will not be fully effective in improving circulation and relieving traffic congestion as long as the bottleneck at the Greenburg Road intersection remains. A corresponding improvement to the Greenburg Road intersection is needed to complement the Hall/99W project and improve traffic circulation across and along Highway 99W north of the viaduct to the Highway 217 interchange. The specific capacity improvement will include: •Separating the through and left-turn movements by adding dedicated left-turn lanes on Greenburg Road and Main Street, •Providing dedicated through movements across the intersection from both side streets and retain the dedicated right-turn lanes on both streets,and •Constructing an additional eastbound through lane on Highway 99W from the viaduct east through the intersection to connect to the new eastbound through lane planned for the Highway 99W/Hall Boulevard intersection.The Design&Engineering FY2009-10 includes$150,000 for Design&Engineering and$240,000 for Construction Engineering and Management. The entire$473,000 budget FY2010-11 is for Construction Engineering and Management. Location °MI Greenburg Rd./Hwy 99W/Main St. Project Manager(s) Gus Dueness,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Fully Funded 12/03/2008 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 1,000,000 570,000 50,000 620,000 Design and Engineering 185,074 15,000 400,000 390,000 473,000 1,263,000 Construction 150,000 770,000 2,310,000 3,080,000 Environmental 300 Project Total 18.5,074 1,165,300 970,000 1,210,000 2,783,000 4,963,000 Project Funding Source City Gas Tax 185,074 1,1 50,000 970,000 1,210,000 2,783,000 4,963,000 Water Fund 15,300 Project Total 185,074 1,165,300 970,000 1,210,000 2,783,000 4,963,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-3 95350-100th Ave. Improvements (Satt ler to Lady Marion) This project provides funding to widen the narrow roadway by backfilling the existing ditches that are 3 to 6 feet deep on the west side of 100th Ave between Sattler and Lady Marion Street.Sidewalks are only installed where needed as there are existing off-street walkways along a majority portion of the street.Completion of the project should enhance traffic safety and provide continuous walkway from Lady Marion to Sattler Street. -- Location Sattler to Lady Marion T 1111 Project Manager(s) \Tannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Unfunded 12/03/20A Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 40,000 40,000 Construction 225,000 225,000 Project Total 40,000 225,000 265,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 40,000 225,000 265,000 Project Total 40,000 225,000 265,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-4 95410-72nd Improvements (Dartmouth St.to Hwy 99W) The vertical alignment of 72nd Avenue between Dartmouth Street and Highway 99W requires corrections to meet sight distance standards. In addition,the street is narrow and the pavement surface is in poor condition.This project widens the street,corrects the vertical sight distance,upgrades the existing storm drain,extends the sanitary sewer,and undergrounds the existing utilities to provide a three-lane roadway section with bike lanes and sidewalks both sides.Rights-of-way will be obtained as part of the project for the ultimate street cross section of five lanes. Location 72nd Ave. (Dartmouth&Hwy 99W) - Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation mss° Funding Status - Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 800,000 800,000 Design and Engineering 400,000 400,000 Project Total 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 Project Total 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-5 95450-121st Improvements (Walnut St.to North Dakota) This project widens 121st Avenue between Walnut and North Dakota Street to a three-lane roadway with bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides.Planter strips are also installed wherever feasible.Water,storm drainage,and sanitary sewer improvements and utility under-grounding are also included in the project.Replacement of the existing bridge on this street will be done under a separate project as costs associated with the replacement may be substantial and could possibly be funded through different funding sources (i.e. federal grants).The funding provided is for permitting and right-of-way acquisition. Location 'it.,,•.t.,.: 7, Between Walnut St.&N. Dakota , �_>. Project Manager(s) "P,7 q x : Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation• �' ft, i Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 300,000 300,000 Design and Engineering 75,000 75,000 Project Total 75,000 300,000 375,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee _ 75,000 300,000 375,000 Project Total 75,000 300,000 375,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-6 95460-121st Improvements (Whistler to Tippitt) The design for the project,which was completed in FY 2003-04,consists of roadway,storm drainage,water,streetlight improvements and utility underground.Partial right-of- way has been acquired from two properties.Remaining rights-of-way are proposed for FY 2011-12 and the construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2012-13.Upon completion of the construction,the street will have a paved width of 44 feet,which consists of two travel lanes,a center-turn lane and two bike lanes.Sidewalks will also be provided. ;, _ Location \ wti., ,• g a Whistler to Tippitt �:a x � . -4� 1. •• _ Project Manager(s) __ =- _ Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation • . _._ _ _ _ Funding Status -• ` - Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 400,000 400,000 Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 Project Total 400,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,400,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 400,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,400,000 Project Total 400,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,400,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-7 95470-72nd Improvements (Bonita Rd.to Hunziker) This project continues the proposed improvements for 72nd Avenue from south of the 72nd Ave/Dartmouth Street intersection to Hunziker Street.The improvements involve street widening,utility underground,storm drainage and sanitary sewer upgrades. One travel lane will be provided in each direction.A center-turn lane will also be added to allow for left-turning movements.Full-width sidewalks and bike lanes will also be installed as part of the improvements. . .� '�tIF � �s",I, �, z,it%4uw... . `r Location A. F r te, 72nd Ave. (Bonita Rd.to Hunziker) : k, } 1 ..i Project Manager(s) i d - Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation _ `` - Funding Status 'i._-...v. Unfiuided Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 300,000 300,000 Project Total 300,000 300,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 300,000 300,000 Project Total 300,000 300,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-8 • 95480-72nd Improvements (Hunziker to Dartmouth) This project widens 72nd Avenue to a three-lane roadway,which includes a center-turn lane and one travel lane in each direction.Sidewalk will be installed at a location where it can be retained for the ultimate improvements for a five-lane roadway section as specified by the Tigard Transportation System Plan.Right-of-way acquisition and construction are scheduled for FY 2013-14. fit. scr Location . 72nd Ave. (Hunziker to Dartmouth) Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 400,000 400,000 Project Total 400,000 400,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 400,000 400,000 Project Total 400,000 400,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-9 95490-92nd Sidewalk(Durham Rd.to Cook Park) This project will rebuild existing street sections and add curbs,drainage facilities and sidewalks to provide a safe pedestrian travel between Cook Park and Durham Road. Sidewalks will only be built on one side of the street due to limited rights-of-way,impacts to the on-street parkings in front of Tigard High School and to wetlands near the entrance to the park. • Location Durham Rd. to Cook Park - Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 50,000 50,000 Design and Engineering 25,000 25,000 Construction _ 400,000 400,000 Project Total 75,000 400,000 475,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax _ 75,000 400,000 475,000 Project Total 75,000 400,000 475,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-10 95500-Dartmouth St. Improvements (72nd to 68th Ave.) Project Description:This project proposes to reconstruct Dartmouth Street between 72nd and 68th Avenue.The street from east of Highway 99W to 72nd Avenue has been Unproved by the City and surrounding developments in the past few years.The design for improvements of the Dartmouth Street and 72nd Avenue intersection,including signalization of the intersection,has been completed. Half-street improvements have been performed by some developements adjacent to the intersections and by Tigard Triangle Local Improvement District.This project reserves funding to complete the improvements from east of the intersection to 68th Avenue.The street section after construction will have two travel lanes,one in each direction,a center-turn lane and bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides. Location Dartmouth(72nd to 68th) arc . .. Project Manager(s) ' as Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation 1 Funding Status ( Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 500,000 500,000 Design and Engineering 300,000 300,000 Project Total 300,000 500,000 800,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 300,000 500,000 800,000 Project Total 300,000 500,000 800,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-11 95520-Hall Blvd. Right-Turn Lane This project widens Hall Blvd to provide a southbound right-turn lane onto McDonald Street and modifies the existing traffic signal to accommodate the new street configuration at the intersection.In addition,curb and sidewalk will be installed within the limits of the improvements to improve pedestrian safety.The design will be in conformance with ODOT standards as the street is under the jurisdiction of the State. t -, - ; - 3 - '�' - Location '4`" i 1.r McDonald St. ,� 4 , Project Manager(s) ._aw_ �...f .' - __._..:_.-. - Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation 14 Funding Status • Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 75,000 75,000 Design and Engineering 75,000 75,000 Construction 250,000 250,000 Project Total 75,000 75,000 250,000 400,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 75,000 75,000 250,000 400,000 Project Total 75,000 75,000 250,000 400,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-12 95540-N.Dakota Pedestrian Bridge The existing North Dakota Street Bridge is too narrow to safely pass pedestrian and vehicular traffic simultaneously.A feasibility study conducted by a bridge consultant in 2005 recommends installation of a separate pedestrian bridge to resolve the problem.The study presents an option to build the bridge in two phases: the first phase is to construct a separate 8-foot wide pre-cast concrete bridge on the south side of the existing bridge.The second phase is to salvage the bridge and widen it to a full width to be used by pedestrians,bicyclists and vehicular traffic.This project addresses the work for the first phase. ,, Location i n Oft At Fanno Creek ii " c G '" - ' Project Manager(s) �: Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 75,000 75,000 Construction 200,000 200,000 Project Total 75,000 200,000 275,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 75,000 200,000 275,000 _ Project Total 75,000 200,000 275,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-13 95550-N.Dakota Street Improvements (Greenburg Rd. to 95th Ave.) North Dakota Street between Greenburg Road and 95th Avenue is currently unimproved.The existing drainage system is under capacity and a major portion of the street is narrow and does not have curb and sidewalk. Improvements of the street will be in accordance with the design standards required for a Neighborhood route,which include one travel lane in each direction and parking on both sides of the street.Curbs and sidewalks will also be included.This project provides funding for permitting and acquisition of rights-of-way necessary for the widening. Location Greenburg Rd.to 95th Ave. • Project Manager(s) • _ ___. Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation � Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 100,000 100,000 Design and Engineering 25,000 _ 25,000 Project Total 25,000 100,000 125,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax _ 25,000 100,000 125,000 Project Total 25,000 100,000 125,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-14 95560-Walnut St. Improvements (116th to Tiedeman) The design of Walnut Street between 116th and Tiedeman Avenue was completed in 2001.The rights-of-way needed for the widening have been purchased.Completion of the construction will widen the street to a three-lane roadway(one traveled lane in each direction and a center-turn lane)with bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides.Landscaped strips will not be included to the project as the strips between the curbs and the sidewalks will force the sidewalks closer to homes. Construction is scheduked for two years with the first year reserved for utility under-grounding and culvert replacement. Location 72nd Ave. (Bonita Rd.to Hunziker) Project Manager(s) t _ Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,500,000 Project Total _ 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,500,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee _ 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,500,000 Project Total 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,500,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-15 95910-Crosswalk(Hall Blvd./Fanno Creek) This project provides funding for the crosswalk light on Hall Blvd that may not be completed due to the amount of time required to order and install the lighting equipment beginning in spring or late spring of 2009. 7 Y fC 4 Location afr,z1r¢��< , ��.,�.a At Fanno Creek Pathway Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation '� '$' Funding Status Fully Funded --,,..-L_: s . Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 80,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 Project Total 80,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 80,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 Project Total 80,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-16 95920-Main St.Traffic Signal A traffic analysis performed by in-house staff in FY 2006-07 indicates that the Main St./Tigard St.intersection does not fully meet the requirements of one of the traffic signal warrants. Another traffic analysis will be performed in FY 2009-10 after the Commuter Rail begins operation. If the analysis clearly indicates that a signal is warranted,the funds provided under this project will be used for design and construction of the signal beginning FY 2010-11. Location Main&Tigard St. Photo goes here Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation • Funding Status Unfunded • Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 25,000 25,000 Design and Engineering 150,000 150,000 Project Total 25,000 150,000 175,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 25,000 150,000 175,000 Project Total 25,000 150,000 175,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-17 95980-Tigard Triangle Local Improvement District On February 26,2008,City Council established Tigard Triangle LID No. 1 to improve streets within the Tigard Triangle. SW 69th Avenue between SW Dartmouth Street and about 100 feet south of Baylor and SW Clinton Street between SW 68th Parkway and SW 70th Avenue will be fully improved with curbs,sidewalks,street trees and street lighting. The north side of Dartmouth Street from 68th Parkway to SW 70th Avenue will also be improved with curbs,sidewalks,street trees and street lighting. The west side of SW 68th Parkway from SW Dartmouth Street to approximately 350 feet north of Clinton Street will be improved with sidewalk,street trees and street lighting. In addition, sidewalks,ramps,curbs,signing and striping will be installed for a proposed traffic signal at SW 68th Avenue and Dartmouth Street. A sanitary sewer in SW 69th Avenue will be extended to provide sewer service to all properties within the District. c-, `' i1": 4 , ,� .. , . 1i� t Location '‘.7.,..!7" ."1—,,„,, ,„,,..rs ."� >. , -� SW 69th and 70th North of SW Dartmouth St. C< "1-7--,_.....q;.- ^< pp ; ;;;;• 1 wee Project Manager(s) Gus Duenas,Capital Construction&Transportation ' y s�s,� ,, t :'' •I-a z-11 fir'_ �1.r« .� r �" „¢„ Funding Status 1- 1.1 , ='—'---':).r 4 L,.1(7._ 42, *- _ '! Fully Funded T :1 •• t Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 90,904 75,000 294,321 369,321 Construction 2,200,000 1,880,679 1,880,679 Project Total 90,904 2,200,000 75,000 2,175,000 2,250,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 90,904 75,000 75,000 Tigard Triangle LID#1 2,200,000 2,175,000 2,175,000 Project Total 90,904 2,200,000 75,000 2,175,000 2,250,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-18 96280-Sidewalk(Hall Blvd./Bonita Rd to 600'N) This project is carried over from FY 2008-09. New sidewalks are proposed on the east side of Hall Blvd,north of Bonita Road.There are gaps in the sidewalks at this location where a new bus stop is proposed to be installed. One of the gaps includes a narrow shoulder and steep slope,which create safety concern for pedestrians and bicyclists. Traffic turning right onto Hall Boulevard from Bonita Road also put pedestrians waiting for stop lights at the corner at risk. In addition to installing a new sidewalk at this location,a retaining wall will be constructed to support the infill placed for the sidewalk. Completion of the sidewalk improvements is expected to significantly improve pedestrian safety and enhance transit accessibility. This project is funded in the amount of$270,566 by the State Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvement grant.The City provides a local share of$66,000 funded through the Gas Tax Fund.Engineering and construction management will be performed by the City as additional local match. Location Hall Blvd. / Bonita Rd. Project Manager(s) Fannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Fully Funded t r s ems "? � re ' }500}2008 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 30,000 30,000 Construction 336,566 306,566 306,566 Project Total 336,566 30,000 306,566 336,566 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 336,566 30,000 306,566 336,566 Project Total 336,566 30,000 306,566 336,566 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-19 96400-Greenburg Rd. Improvements (North Dakota to Shady Lane) This project will widen the existing 3-lane roadway to provide a 5-lane facility with bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides.The street will be reconstructed as necessary for proper vertical alignment.The traffic signals on Greenburg Road at Cascade Blvd and Tiedeman Road will be modified to conform to the widened roadway.Appropriate transitions will be built at both ends of the street as well as the intersecting streets.The existing bridge will also be replaced to allow for the expanded roadway. Construction of the project is not scheduled at this time. Location North Dakota to Shady Ln. Project Manager(s) •� • Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation ." Jul _-• Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 40,000 40,000 Construction 135,000 135,000 Project Total 40,000 135,000 175,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 40,000 135,000 175,000 Project Total 40,000 135,000 175,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-20 96710-Crosswalk& Lighting System-Durham Rd. at Tigard High School This project is carried over from FY 2008-09 to complete the installation of a marked crosswalk,crosswalk signal and advance warning signs on Durham Road at Tigard High School,midway between the signalized intersection of 92nd Ave and Hall Blvd.A traffic study conducted earlier indicates a marked crosswalk is warranted at this location. ' 1+1-4,'am _ , ric-* a 1> Location ,;24. -t,1_�,.,...c.t ,.- 44 't verb t } Durham Rd.&Tigard H.S.7-1° Project Manager(s) 'I : , Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation ~ti! l _ ' Funding Status M: k --�•r, .,r',- Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 60,000 60,000 5,000 65,000 Project Total 0 60,000 60,000 5,000 65,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 60,000 60,000 5,000 65,000 Project Total 0 60,000 60,000 5,000 65,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-21 ???-Barrows Rd. Bridge Repair Repair of the Barrows Rd.Bridge by replacement of the bridge superstructure with a glulam deck with new timber footings on each side of the bridge. Total repair costs are estimated at$150,000 with the cities of Tigard and Beaverton,and Washington County dividing the costs three ways. The City of Tigard's obligation would be$50,000 maximum. This project and the participation by the cities is based on an anticipated life span of 20 years or more of full traffic loads. The most recent County investigation of the existing soil conditions at the bridge is that the anticipated life span is only 5 years. This project is still under discussion and may be postponed if a joint agreement is not reached based on the lastest information. 1f Location u. Barrows Rd.between Walnut St.&Scholls Ferry Rd. _ Project Manager(s) °' `' U v :`�l e 4 `ti 0:i:!,-..-. ` = ` Gus Duenas,Capital Construction&Transportation r � Funding Status ' °` Unfunded .4 •.� ".:. Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 50,000 50,000 Project Total 50,000 _ 50,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 50,000 50,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-22 ???-Barrows Rd. Sidewalk Installation In FY 2008-09,the City entered into an agreement with Washington County to construct remaining half-street improvements along the east side of Barrows Road from Scholls Ferry to approximately 1,100 feet south.The remaining improvements involve installation of a 5-foot sidewalk on one side of the street and connection of the sidewalk to an existing bridge.A developer was required by the County to perform the half-street improvements on Barrows Road but could not complete the sidewalk as it has to be incorporated into the replacement of the existing bridge handled by Washington County.Since the City of Tigard will take over half jurisdiction of Barrows Road,it was agreed that the City will complete the sidewalk installation.The City has received$71,814 from the developer for the installation and the money has been deposited in the Gas Tax Fund. Location Barrows Rd. " �u�t Project Manager(s) `. • = Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-U 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 71,814 _ 71,814 Project Total 71,814 71,814 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 71,814 71,814 Project Total 71,814 71,814 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-23 ???-Garrett St.Sidewalk Funding provided by the Community Block Grant Program in the amount of$141,790 will be used for installation of a new sidewalk on one side of Garrett Street between Ash Ave and Hwy 99W.Landscaped strips,separating the sidewalk from the street,will not be provided as this will force the new sidewalk closer to homes.The project is expected to improve residents'access to school bus stops,transit stops and nearby stores and services.Engineering and construction management will be performed by the City as local match. { Location I - r : Ash Ave.to Hwy 99W - ! Project Manager(s) -— Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 141,790 141,790 Project Total 141,790 141,790 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 141,790 141,790 Project Total 141,790 141,790 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-24 ???-Citywide Pedestrian/Sidewalk Improvements This project constructs pathways to improve pedestrian safety and access between bus stops,schools and nearby stores and services.Pathways can either be concrete sidewalks or paved/gravel paths.Landscaped strips are not included in the construction as the project is to fill in gaps between existing sidewalks or to install new sidewalks within limited rights-of-way to enhance pedestrian access.Paved/gravel pathways may also be off-street but within street rights-of-way.The fund may be used to prepare,in partnership with the school district,a master plan for sidewalk,bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements within two miles of schools in Tigard.Improvements identified in the master plan may be used to request for grants from federal and state programs.Grants,if obtainable,will be used to expand local funding sources to make school routes safe for children to walk and bike. _ Location• - Various +r- _ Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-25 ???-Tiedeman Ave.Traffic Signal&Northbound Left-Turn Lane In 2007,the City conducted a Traffic Improvement analysis in the area of Greenburg Road,Tiedeman Ave,North Dakota and Tigard Street.The analysis reveals severall traffic issues in the area. One of the recommendations to resovle the issues and to improve transportation conditions is to construct a traffic signal at the Tiedeman Ave/Tigard Street intersection.The study also recommends adding a separate northbound left-turn lane on Tiedeman Ave and making the existing lane a shared through and right-turn onto Tigard Street.Right-of-way has been dedicated by a private development at the corner at the intersection.Additional right-of-way is required for construction of the additional lane. Completion of the improvements is expected to minimize vehicular delays and queuing at the intersection. • Location • Tigard St. Project Manager(s) Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status Unfunded 12/03/2008 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 35,000 35,000 Design and Engineering 75,000 75,000 Construction _ 300,000 300,000 Project Total 110,000 300,000 410,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 110,000 300,000 410,000 Project Total 110,000 300,000 410,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-26 ???-Walnut St. Signal&Westbound Right-Turn Lane Drivers currently experience congested conditions at the all-way-stop intersection of Walnut Street with 135th Avenue. Congestion is particularly prevalent for westbound traffic in the afternoon peak hours. This project would alleviate this congestion by installing a traffic signal at this intersection and by constructing a complete right-turn lane and bike lane for westbound traffic at this intersection. .. ' Y p 5 r fir; Location . Walnut St.& 135th Ave. s .,_ l` • , 1 . Project Manager(s) I i Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation �. -------_ 1 - - - Funding Status , Unfunded - 12/04/2008 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 50,000 50,000 Construction 350,000 350,000 Project Total 50,000 350,000 400,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee _ 50,000 350,000 400,000 Project Total 50,000 350,000 400,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 5-27 City of Tigard Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Water System Page Projected Number Project 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total 6-1 91160-Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) 154,000 117,150 124,765 132,874 141,511 150,710 821,010 6-2 91170-Water Meter Installations 50,000 82,005 87,335 93,012 99,058 105,497 516,907 6-3 95570-550'Zone Improvements: 10 MG Transfer Pump Station 400,000 4,686,000 623,825 5,709,825 6-4 95600-ASR 1 Rehabilitation 664,371 664,371 6-5 95610-ASR Expansion Studies 50,000 141,512 1,959,226 2,150,738 6-6 95680-Water Building Conservation Demonstration Garden 32,000 363,165 395,165 6-7 95690-Water Main Line Oversizing 146,438 155,956 166,093 176,889 188,387 833,763 6-8 95710-Water Service Installations 10,400 12,184 12,976 13,819 14,717 15,674 79,770 6-9 95720-Water Site Security Upgrades 52,000 60,918 64,878 69,095 73,586 78,369 398,846 6-10 95740-Aquifer Storage&Recovery Well#3 265,749 2,830,226 3,095,975 6-11 95830-Commercial St.Improvement 120,000 120,000 6-12 96220-High Tor Pump Station Rebuild 1,575,600 1,575,600 6-13 96550-Lake Oswego Partnerships(Funded) 2,900,000 2,900,000 6-14 96550-Lake Oswego Partnerships(Unfunded) 1,200,000 2,000,000 5,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 24,200,000 6-15 ???-High Tor Pump Station-Electrical Pump Control Panel Replacement 77,320 77,320 6-16 ???-SDC Methodology Update 50,000 50,000 6-17 ???-Pipeline Extensions 175,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 425,000 6-18 ???-Sherwood Partnership 1,000,000 1,000,000 6-19 ???-Water Line Replacement Program 107,604 210,870 224,577 239,174 254,720 271,278 1,308,223 6-20 ???-Walnut St.Water Line Relocate Project 218,679 79,549 298,228 Total Water System 3,756,004 7,817,885 3,833,740 9,348,213 9,086,993 12,777,906 46,620,741 91160-Defective Meter Replacements (Smaller Sizes) Replacement of large and small water meters at end of service life(over 20 years). '-4 Location ' Tigard Water Service Area • Project Manager(s) f % John Goodrich,Public Works ,, Funding Status {� Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 154,000 154,000 117,150 124,765 132,874 141,511 150,710 821,010 Project Total 154,000 154,000 117,150 124,765 132,874 141,511 150,710 821,010 Project Funding Source Water Fund 154,000 154,000 117,150 124,765 132,874 141,511 150,710 821,010 Project Total 154,000 154,000 117,150 124,765 132,874 141,511 150,710 821,010 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-1 91170-Water Meter Installations Installation of water meters for new services. _ h ` - x "iz. -- # M� Location k% ` `�"u r Tigard Water Service Area Project Manager(s) `� --- John Goodrich,Public Works ice' j `* F"" � Funding Status . �' Fully Funded -- :-•toR.0 r - ` 23 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 72,427 50,000 50,000 82,005 87,335 93,012 99,058 105,497 516,907 Project Total 72,427 50,000 50,000 82,005 87,335 93,012 99,058 105,497 516,907 Project Funding Source Water Fund 72,427 50,000 50,000 82,005 87,335 93,012 99,058 105,497 516,907 Project Total 72,427 50,000 50,000 82,005 87,335 93,012 99,058 105,497 516,907 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-2 I 95570-550'Zone Improvements: 10 MG Transfer Pump Station The existing transfer pump station located on the 10 MG reservoir site at Bull Mountain Road/125th Avenue,serves both the 550-foot and 713-foot service zones.The Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study identified a need to replace this pump station with one that would provide a higher pumping capacity to both service zones.Construction of this improvement increases pumping capacity from 2000 gpm to 3300 gpm for the 713-foot service zone.The pump station will also provide 3900 gpm to the 550-Foot Zone Reservoir No.2.Along with the pump station improvements,a seismic evaluation of the existing 10 MG reservoir will be completed to determine what upgrades shall be incorporated during construction as a part of the overall project. J, , �� Location Bull Mountain Rd.& 125th Ave. .... . , Project Manager(s) 1 t -. "., Rob Murchison,Public Works —.--- z-- Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 300,000 400,000 400,000 Construction 2,750,000 4,686,000 623,825 _ 5,309,825 Project Total 2,750,000 400,000 4,686,000 623,825 5,709,825 Project Funding Source Water CIP 3,050,000 400,000 4,686,000 623,825 5,709,825 Project Total 3,050,000 400,000 4,686,000 623,825 5,709,825 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-3 95600-ASR 1 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation of ASR wells is recommended every six years. Typical work involved may include removal of the pump and reconditioning of the well. Location '�� f �j�' �' Canterbury ASR Site•T F s , ,,1.y s Al T _ 'z►° `` 'l �'�� ' Project Manager(s) -If , + 0,—t -_ :• a'J Rob Murchison,Public Works °" Funding Status ' Fully Funded 08/31/2006 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 60,397 60,397 Construction 603,974 _ 603,974 Project Total 664,371 664,371 Project Funding Source Water Fund 664,371 664,371 Project Total 664,371 664,371 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-4 95610-ASR Expansion Studies The City's hydrogeologist of record will assist Staff in locating potential sites for additional aquifer storage and recovery(ASR wells). In addition,test wells must be drilled by a qualified well driller in order for the hydrogeologist to determine suitability of the well for ASR purposes. Therefore,these studies will include both consultant services and drilling services. `1 Location To Be Determined 1 Project Manager(s) Rob Murchison,Public Works ;Ai , x - Funding Status Fully Funded 2007/07/24 "mss 4 - Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 287,066 50,000 50,000 141,512 191,512 Construction 1,959,226 1,959,226 Project Total 287,066 50,000 50,000 141,512 1,959,226 2,150,738 Project Funding Source WaterClP 287,066 50,000 50,000 141,512 1,959,226 2,150,738 Project Total 287,066 50,000 50,000 141,512 1,959,226 2,150,738 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-5 95680-Water Building Conservation Demonstration Garden Initially designed for Public Works Building grounds,this project can be moved to a different location. As Tigard continues to support regional water conservation efforts,one way of providing public education is in the area of landscaping. Tigard currently provides incentives to customers who demonstrate they have installed water saving elements into their irrigation design. Another excellent way of providing education to customers is by establishing a demonstration garden that would incorporate a variety of water saving irrigation features,creative plant selection and layout. t 4 - v " wg�+ 1 Location W L.ri. %.,_,Y `1lLVti .e.4_ 1..> ;t�?�C.,.. To Be Determined • s '4.:"-",',� =}" t' •! Project Manager(s) "' ' ,..„"..?-t-•. '' _• ;='. \ ie r�','� Rob Murchison,Public Works w -- s . ' ∎ y k -, ,_ ' - Funding Status �•'PC y * t.. 1.¢+�lrt Fully Funded ;' ,_k ' Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 10,650 10,650 Construction 24,989 125,000 32,000 352,515 384,515 Project Total 24,989 125,000 32,000 363,165 395,165 Project Funding Source Water CIP 24,989 125,000 32,000 363,165 395,165 Project Total 24,989 125,000 32,000 363,165 395,165 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-6 95690-Water Main Line Oversizing During the course of the year,the City may find the need to upsize a planned pipeline through a new development,thus accomplishing an identified capital improvement as listed in the Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study dated May 2000. t Location A 47:71.70. �. To Be Determined \'/` .• 4 Project Manager(s) r Rob Murchison,Public Works u: . 3 tr Funding Status N. Fully Funded A Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 125,000 146,438 155,956 166,093 176,889 188,387 833,763 Project Total 125,000 146,438 155,956 166,093 176,889 188,387 833,763 Project Funding Source Water SDC 125,000 146,438 155,956 166,093 176,889 188,387 833,763 Project Total 125,000 146,438 155,956 166,093 176,889 188,387 833,763 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-7 95710-Water Service Installations Installation of new service water lines ,. 'w, -,-.4 - 47-il;s-Mr '' .r:: 4I■ i? asr Lv- ' '';'-'_. 1'14 , Location Tigard Water Service Area e -jam ^� Project Manager(s) fJohn Goodrich,Public Works _ Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 11,692 10,400 10,400 12,184 12,976 13,819 14,717 15,674 79,770 Project Total 11,692 10,400 10,400 12,184 12,976 13,819 14,717 15,674 79,770 Project Funding Source Water Fund 11,692 10,400 10,400 _ 12,184 12,976 13,819 14,717 15,674 79,770 Project Total 11,692 10,400 10,400 12,184 12,976 13,819 14,717 15,674 79,770 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-8 95720-Water Site Security Upgrades Installation of new upgrades to Water Site security systems within the Tigard Water Service Area in order to meet regulatory requirements of Department of Homeland Security regarding public drinking water systems. +s a 1• t. • ac. ._,i►,s. x „ #.'•- ,z.e.I Location Tigard Water Service Area - ,._ ,- ,� ,: Project Manager(s) 7 t John Goodrich,Public Works Funding Status - s*-.. 4 ' 1 Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 39,295 52,000 52,000 60,918 64,878 69,095 73,586 78,369 398,846 Project Total 39,295 52,000 52,000 60,918 64,878 69,095 73,586 78,369 398,846 Project Funding Source Water Fund 39,295 52,000 52,000 60,918 _ 64,878 69,095 73,586 78,369 398,846 Project Total 39,295 52,000 52,000 60,918 64,878 69,095 73,586 78,369 398,846 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-9 95740-Aquifer Storage&Recovery Well#3 The Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study identified a need for the expansion of the City's Aquifer Storage and Recovery program. In fiscal year 2007-08,a 1000 ft deep well was successfully drilled. Well head improvements which include the installation of a pump,motor and accompanying pipe and chlorination system are scheduled for year 2010.The pump station will supplement 2.5 mgd of water to the 550-Foot Zone Reservoir No.2 during dry summer months. VI ��//�� hnln+ll l - ' .R -� Location t'C ,.,, �,�? "-. .a`�r�,.�.�----`-': 1 - 13001 SW Bull Mountain Road ��i> %: f'i• 9 ~.�`. 1 Project Manager(s) 1 IF ,\\!, Rob Murchison,Public Works a;r \ ' If G ,..''' \" \� `•, Funding Status ,z 4 , ,;,e;±11.E I ,. .� a r -,, Fully Funded ;ti • r - 1i°i:ra+e-_ - anti Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 300,000 265,749 265,749 Construction 2,830,226 2,830,226 Project Total 300,000 265,749 2,830,226 3,095,975 Project Funding Source Water CIP 300,000 265,749 2,830,226 _ 3,095,975 Project Total 300,000 265,749 2,830,226 3,095,975 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-10 95830-Commercial St.Improvement Replace existing 8-inch cast iron waterline with 12-inch ductile iron from Main Street to 95th Ave. Project is scheduled to start construction based on proposed road improvements. ? � mot jj r .: N$'..4'' - � � ti '' 1 Location ► .s'1,--, 1y ,, �"� i' :� °, J., ; S ',� Commercial St. r v y ,r . < 4-4f-s-, *- Project Manager(s)i . � 1444 ( f -* Rob Murchison,Public Works .c.,- Funding Status ., � Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction _ 120,000 120,000 120,000 Project Total 120,000 120,000 120,000 Project Funding Source Water Fund _ 120,000 120,000 120,000 Project Total 120,000 120,000 120,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-11 96220-High Tor Pump Station Rebuild The facility is 30 years old and is underground. It has flooded twice in the past 5 years due to mechanical failure. This project will replace the underground facility with a modern,above ground facility to provide a constant flow source to the surrounding neighborhood.Because it will be above ground,it will be protected from future flooding. Location , 14255 SW High Tor Drive ir Project Manager(s) L , .att,_ Rob Murchison,Public Works Funding Status ./ , � �: Fully Funded • . 2008:07717 • Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 205,513 205,513 Construction 1,370,087 1,370,087 Project Total 1,575,600 1,575,600 Project Funding Source Water CIP 1,575,600 _ 1,575,600 Project Total 1,575,600 1,575,600 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-12 96550-Lake Oswego Partnerships The Tigard Water Service Area(TWSA)has signed an agreement to develop a long term water supply with the City of Lake Oswego. Construction will be required of various elements of both City of Tigard and City of Lake Oswego capital improvements. • `� `' Location Tigard Water Service Area Project Manager(s) Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works Funding Status Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 5,011 3,031,579 2,900,000 2,900,000 Project Total 5,011 3,031,579 2,900,000 2,900,000 Project Funding Source Water CIP 5,011 3,031,579 2,900,000 2,900,000 Project Total 5,011 3,031,579 2,900,000 2,900,000 6-13 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 96550-Lake Oswego Partnerships The Tigard Water Service Area(TWSA)has signed an agreement to develop a long term water supply with the City of Lake Oswego. Construction will be required of various elements of both City of Tigard and City of Lake Oswego capital improvements. - 'I � < {r'' � �," E Location *14 � c �. �; _. N � . ' Tigard Water Service Area Project Manager(s) Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 5,011 3,031,579 1,200,000 2,000,000 5,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 24,200,000 Project Total 5,011 3,031,579 1,200,000 2,000,000 5,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 24,200,000 Project Funding Source Water CIP 5,011 3,031,579 1,200,000 2,000,000 5,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 24,200,000 Project Total 5,011 3,031,579 1200,000 2,000,000 5,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 24,200,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-14 ???-High Tot Pump Station- Electrical Pump Control Panel Replacement Provide design engineering and construction to replace underground electrical panel motor control system to above ground electrical pump control panel. Project would eliminate the risk of flooding and damage to electrical system. Existing electrical control panel is more than 30 years old and is at the end of its service life. .X17. ,,; rr, -;— Location ® ( �_ _ 21' Tigard Water Service Area rte ` •f ��, . Project Manager(s) _°, 1 John Goodrich,Public Works -�' :4,',, Funding Status Fully Funded 200Bf +17 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 11,716 11,716 Construction 65,604 65,604 Project Total 77,320 77,320 Project Funding Source Water Fund 77,320 77,320 Project Total 77,320 77,320 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-15 ???-SDC Methodology Update Periodic review of System Development rate methodology regarding developer fees and charges for water utility service infrastructure. Location N/A No Photo Available Project Managers) John Goodrich,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering _ 50,000 50,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 Project Funding Source Water SDC 50,000 50,000 Project Total 50,000 50,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-16 ???-Pipeline Extensions Pipeline extensions for future development of water service distribution area as required by System Development Charges and Fees. -,-=�-_'---4ia 'i _ i• :,,/ ,- _ L Location ` ` 1, i1 To Be Determined -� a . - ,..Y. : "^ "'. ,, z .: .„�1.,, Project Manager(s) Rob Murchison,Public Works - 8 �;� ;., k Funding Status - f °Z�2/11 Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 27,012 125,000 175,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 425,000 Project Total 27,012 125,000 175,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 425,000 Project Funding Source Water SDC 27,012 125,000 175,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 425,000 Project Total 27,012 125,000 175,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 425,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-17 ???-Sherwood Partnership The City has agreed to invest in upsizing a water pipeline through Tualatin into Sherwood for future water needs. Location Tigard Water Service Area Project Manager(s) No Photo Available Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000 Project Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 Project Funding Source Water CIP _ 1,000,000 1,000,000 Project Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-18 ???-Water Line Replacement Program This program includes replacement of water lines that are not serviceable or have reached the end of its life cycle which is more than 50 years. 9 -`:. . - Location ,f-` «. Various Y. .K, .,,, Project Manager(s) { John Goodrich,Public Works r�,;,� .. .;t^ '; v, !' ~q, '�;� Funding Status t �, '` ` Y ""• t2,',12 Fully Funded z�; + ' �_. Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 23,430 24,953 26,575 28,302 30,142 133,402 Construction 22,555 107,604 187,440 199,624 212,599 226,418 241,136 1,174,821 Project Total 22,555 107,604 210,870 224,577 239,174 254,720 271,278 1,308,223 Project Funding Source Water Fund 22,555 107,604 210,871 224,579 239,177 254,724 271,282 1,308,237 Project Total 22,555 107,604 210,871 224,579 239,177 254,724 271,282 1,308,237 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-19 ???-Walnut St.Water Line Relocate Project This project relocates the existing 12-inch main waterline on Walnut Street. This project includes costs for design and construction. Location 116th Ave.to Tiedeman Ave. No Photo Available Project Manager(s) John Goodrich,Public Works Funding Status Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 21,550 21,550 Construction 197,129 79,549 276,678 Project Total 218,679 79,549 298,228 Project Funding Source Water Fund 218,679 79,549 298,228 Project Total 218,679 79,549 298,228 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 6-20 City of Tigard Fiscal Years 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program Downtown Projects Page Projected Number Project 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total 7-1 90560-Ash Ave. Extension (Burnham to RR) 750,000 750,000 7-2 90650-Hall Blvd. at Hwy 99W Gateway 260,000 75,000 100,000 435,000 7-3 90720-Burnham St. Reconstruction 1,400,000 5,106,463 3,000,000 9,506,463 7-4 95130-Park Land Aquistion 310,000 20,000 330,000 7-5 95830-Commercial St. Intersection(Lincoln to Main) 800,000 800,000 7-6 95870-Fanno Creek Trail(Main St. to Grant St.) 115,000 70,000 185,000 7-7 95900-Fanno Creek Plaza(Unfunded) 2,420,000 2,457,000 4,877,000 7-8 95930-Main St. /Green St. Retrofit 60,000 60,000 380,000 500,000 7-9 95960-Scoffins/Hall/Hunziker Realignment 75,000 150,000 225,000 7-10 96630-Lower Fanno Creek Park 150,000 170,000 320,000 7-11 96630-Lower Fanno Creek Park(Unfunded) 951,050 414,000 276,300 1,641,350 7-12 96640-Festival Street 123,000 820,680 943,680 Total Downtown Projects 2,785,00() 5,686,463 6,826,050 3,046,000 1,199,300 970,680 20,513,493 I 90560-Ash Ave.Extension(Burnham to RR) The project includes construction of a 24-foot wide paved section to provide two travel lanes and a 5-foot wide sidewalk on the west side. Streetlights,storm drain and sanitary sewer pipes are also included in the project. The new street connects the future Burnham/Ash Avenue intersection to the new Park and Ride parking lot constructed by the Commuter Rail project. �. tea •" Location L'>%' ti t Burnham St.to Railroad Tracks ft Project Manager(s) Kim McMillan,Development Engineering Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/ROW $ 378,920 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Design and Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Construction $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Project Total $ 378,920 $ 400,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax $ 378,920 $ 400,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Project Total $ 400,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-1 90650-Hall Blvd.at Hwy 99W Gateway The Hall/99W intersection is a"catalyst project"in the Downtown Plan and provides landscape and streetscape improvements at the intersection to create a"Gateway"to Downtown. The project will occur in stages and be installed as part of the MSTIP3 Hall Boulevard at Highway 99W Right-Turn Lane Widening project managed by Washington County. The improvements will incorporate the design concept established by the Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Plan. The first phase includes sidewalk widening and the installation of street trees that will occur as part of the intersection widening. The second phase will include an entryway feature at the southeast corner of the intersection. A loan will be provided by the Gas Tax Fund to the Urban Renewal portion of this project with expected repayment to the Gas Tax Fund. Location ; Hall Blvd.&Hwy 99W IND i}mil I. ;, ", 4" F"'-,, ''�` Project Manager(s) Gus Duenas,Capital Construction&Transportation .. ., -�inwc _ ? Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 75,000 100,000 100,000 Construction 160,000 75,000 100,000 335,000 Project Total 75,000 260,000 75,000 100,000 435,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 75,000 260,000 75,000 100,000 435,000 Project Total _ 75,000 260,000 75,000 100,000 435,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-2 90720-Burnham St.Reconstruction The construction of Burnham Street improvements incorporates design concepts recommended by the Tigard Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Plan. These concepts include widening Burnham Street between Main Street and Ash Avenue. Thirty-eight feet of width will be paved on Ash Avenue and fifty feet on Hall Boulevard. Sidewalks, landscaped medians,pedestrian crossings and on-street parking will be provided as part of the widening. In addition,a traditional four-way intersection will be installed at the intersection of Burnham Street and Ash Avenue. Green street stormwater management concepts will be applied for water quality enhancement. Construction is scheduled to begin in the Summer of 2009. T 4J L Re k m Location r ^a Burnham St.from Main to Hall Blvd. QM r Project Manager(s) Kim McMillan,Development Engineering Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 421,736 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 Design and Engineering 95,000 100,000 100,000 Construction 3,855,000 5,106,463 3,000,000 8,106,463 Project Total 421,736 5,250,000 1,400,000 5,106,463 3,000,000 9,506,463 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 1,800,000 2,950,000 1,600,000 4,550,000 Traffic Impact Fee 421,736 2,350,000 1,400,000 1,300,000 1,050,000 3,750,000 Underground Utility 300,000 300,000 300,000 Water CIP 450,000 556,463 556,463 Urban Renewal Fund 350,000 350,000 350,000 Project Total 421,736 5,250,000 1,400,000 5,106,463 3,000,000 9,506,463 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-3 95130-Park Land Acquisition This project is to acquire wetland only property for expansion of Lower Fanno Creek Park as defined in the Master Plan for Fanno Creek Park&Plaza. Location Lower Fanno Creek Park 7-..—%014211* � -_ Project Manager(s) Phil Nachbar,Downtown Redevelopment 1 Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 808,816 310,000 20,000 330,000 Project Total 808,816 310,000 20,000 330,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 808,816 310,000 20,000 330,000 Project Total 808,816 310,000 20,000 330,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-4 95830-Commercial St.Intersection(Lincoln to Main) Commercial Street is located in the downtown area of Tigard.The improvements involve re-construction of the existing pavement and base and construction of sidewalk on the north side of the street to provide a safe walk for the neighborhood to the Commuter station,bus stops and businesses on Main Street.The total paved width of Commercial Street after completion is 28 feet,which will accommodate two travel lanes,one in each direction.Parking on the street will be permitted between the Highway 99W over-crossing and Main Street.Streetscape improvements for the project will incorporate design concepts recommended by the Tigard Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape Plan.The project's storm water treatment facility will also be enlarged to provide treatment for a significant portion of the downtown Tigard area(approximately 20 acres)and another 20 acres of an older developed area just west of the Highway 99W over-crossing.The additional treatment will be funded through the Water Quality/Quantity Fund while the water will be funded through the Water fund.The design has been substantially completed and the construction has been delayed due to funding limitations. :.. ,ii,,,..,,4 Sc' 'n r, 's •0, w \ 1 t to - '_ P 'r .!, Location ,0 ;.; `� Pl ' Lincoln Ave.to Main St. -� k Project Manager(s) I j: . Vannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation ''` Funding Status Unfunded 12/03/2008 Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 120,000 800,000 800,000 Project Total 120,000 800,000 800,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 800,000 800,000 Water Fund 120,000 _ Project Total 120,000 800,000 800,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-5 95870-Fanno Creek Trail(Main St.to Grant St.) This project includes the installation of a trail from Main St.to Grant St. This trail is a key part of the larger Fanno Creek Regional Trail System from Portland to Tualatin. Location Main to Grant No Photo Available Project Manager(s) Steve Martin,Public Works Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 115,000 115,000 Construction 70,000 70,000 Project Total 115,000 70,000 185,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 26,105 17,000 43,105 General Fund 88,895 53,000 141,895 Project Total 115,000 70,000 185,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-6 95900-Fanno Creek Plaza Fanno Creek Plaza is the planned,future gathering place for Downtown,and is part of the Fanno Creek Park&Plaza Master Plan adopted by Council in February 2008. The Plaza is also part of Upper Park and together form the public spaces for community events and casual use by the public. ., Location Southside of Burnham St.near Main St. Project Manager(s) • ^' ' Phil Nachbar,Downtown Redevelopment Funding Status R 3 Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Land/Right of Way Acquistion 2,100,000 2,100,000 Design and Engineering 320,000 320,000 Construction 2,457,000 2,457,000 Project Total 2,420,000 2,457,000 4,877,000 Project Funding Source Unknown 2,420,000 2,457,000 4,877,000 Project Total 2,420,000 2,457,000 4,877,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-7 95930-Main St. / Green St. Retrofit The Main Street project is a multi-year project including comprehensive redesign and construction of the full length of Main Street. The project is divided into 2 phases:Phase 1 starts at the railroad tracks south to Highway 99W and Phase 2 from the railroad tracks north to Greenburg Road. Phase 1 (MI1P Grant proposal)is to reconstruct the street in accordance with Green Street Standards for 1400 lineal feet of Main Street,from the Commuter Rail entrance to the south entrance at Highway 99W. It encompasses the entire public right-of-way(ROW)and includes streets,curbs,sidewalks,landscape and drainage improvements. Design will be based on concept plans as approved in the Downtown Streetscape Plan. Location Main St. - I Project Manager(s) Kim McMillan,Development Engineering o ..n - . Funding Status Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 255,730 60,000 60,000 120,000 Construction 380,000 380,000 Project Total 255,730 60,000 60,000 380,000 500,000 Project Funding Source Gas Tax 29,269 60,000 60,000 380,000 500,000 Urban Renewal Fund 255,730 Project Total 284,999 60,000 60,000 380,000 500,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-8 95960-Scoffins/Hall/Hunziker Realignment This project corrects the unusual four-leg intersection of Hall Blvd/Scoffins/Hunziker Street.Hunziker and Scoffins Street intersect Hall Boulevard at an acute angle and at two separate locations creating inadequate corner sight distance at four quadrants.The closely spaced offset between the two intersecting streets creates a sub-standard queue- storage distance on Hall Blvd,one of the most heavily traveled streets in Tigard.The proposed funding,if available,is for preparation of a traffic study including alternative resolutions of the problems,conceptual design,and final design. Location -'�_. Scoffins/Hall/Hunziker • Project Manager(s) • Fannie Nguyen,Capital Construction&Transportation Funding Status ' _ b.:a�• Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering _ 75,000 150,000 225,000 Project Total 75,000 150,000 225,000 Project Funding Source Traffic Impact Fee 75,000 150,000 225,000 Project Total 75,000 150,000 225,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-9 96630-Lower Fanno Creek Park Lower Fanno Creek Park is approximately 25 acres and is a natural area with a planned connection to the future public plaza in Downtown. The Lower Park will provide a new trail system,habitat restoration,boardwalks and new bridges and provide viewing areas for the public. Location Hall St.to Main St.-south of Burnham St. Project Manager(s) Phil Nachbar,Downtown Redevelopment Funding Status " Fully Funded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering 260,000 150,000 45,000 195,000 Construction 125,000 125,000 125,000 Project Total 385,000 150,000 170,000 320,000 Project Funding Source Park System Development Charge 385,000 150,000 170,000 320,000 Project Total 385,000 150,000 170,000 320,000 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-10 96630-Lower Fanno Creek Park Lower Fanno Creek Park is approximately 25 acres and is a natural area with a planned connection to the future public plaza in Downtown. The Lower Park will provide a new trail system,habitat restoration,boardwalks and new bndges and provide viewing areas for the public. :•:sue ,:,�.� _'� �_ _` YY~ Location fall St.to Main St.-south of Burnham St. r i Project Manager(s) Phil Nachbar,Downtown Redevelopment • Funding Status " —'°`", •;• Unfunded Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Design and Engineering Construction 951,050 414,000 276,300 1,641,350 Project Total 951,050 414,000 276,300 1,641,350 Project Funding Source Unknown 951,050 414,000 276,300 1,641,350 Project Total 951,050 414,000 276,300 1,641,350 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-11 96640-Festival Street Festival Street is a planned,new street adjoining the Downtown Plaza from Burnham Street,South to Ash Avenue.The street will function to provide vehicular access to Fanno Upland Park,and can be closed off to provide a place for the Tigard Farmer's Market. The street is part of the adopted Fanno Creek Park and Plaza Master Plan, adopted in February 2008. Location �, - �----- Burnham St.between Main&Ash M yr� r' w Project Manager(s) '` --, ti Phil Nachbar,Downtown Redevelopment �' wx Funding Status Unfunded • ai � e - Actual Revised Through Budget Projected 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Total Project by Category Construction 123,000 820,680 943,680 Project Total 123,000 820,680 943,680 Project Funding Source Urban Renewal Fund 123,000 _ 820,680 943,680 Project Total 123,000 820,680 943,680 Tigard Capital Improvement Plan FY 2009-2014 7-12 111 - U11• MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Planning Commission FROM: Darren Wyss, Senior Planner "USA" RE: Tigard 99W Plan TSP and Comp Plan Amendments Workshop DATE: February 23, 2009 At its March 2, 2009 meeting,Planning Commission is scheduled to hold a workshop on CPA2008- 00011. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment will incorporate recommendations from the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan(Tigard 99W Plan)into the Tigard Transportation System Plan and the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments can be found in Attachment 1. The Tigard 99W Plan was developed to evaluate potential solutions to traffic congestion on Highway 99W through Tigard. The recommended solutions were based on both public involvement and interagency coordination and the preferred alternative was an access management strategy as opposed to widening the highway. The amendments included in CPA2008-00011 are the first step in the implementation of the Tigard 99W Plan. This workshop affords the Commission the opportunity to ask questions of staff,get clarification on the development of the Tigard 99W Plan, and request any additional information that will be needed to help the Commission make a decision at the public hearing scheduled for April 6, 2009. As always, staff is available to answer any questions that might arise before the workshop and we encourage Commissioners to contact us by either phone or email. Staff will send out a timely response to any requests/questions so that the Commission has the information available during the meeting discussion. This will help to facilitate a productive discussion and eliminate staff consuming the Commission's limited,but valuable time. Please forward questions on the proposed amendment to me at 503-718-2442 or darren(a7tigard-or.gov Thanks and see you all on the 2"d. Attachments: Attachment 1: Land Use Application Narrative (proposed amendments) Attachment 2: October 2007 Memorandum to Tigard City Council Attachment 3: Council Meeting Minutes—November 20, 2007 Work Session ATTACHMENT 1 Land Use Review Application Narrative Tigard Transportation Plan and Comprehensive Plan III 01 Amendments to Incorporate Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan Recommendations TI GARD APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Contact: Darren Wyss OWNER: N/A LOCATION: Citywide (City of Tigard) ZONING DESIGNATION: All City zoning designations. COMP PLAN: All City Comp Plan designations. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390; Comprehensive Plan Chapters Goal 1: Citizen Involvement;Goal 2: Land Use Planning;Goal 6: Environmental Quality; Goal 12:Transportation; Oregon Transportation Plan;Oregon Highway Plan;Regional Transportation Plan;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 11,and 12;and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-12 (Transportation Planning Rule). PROPOSAL: The City is requesting approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to: 1. Update the Tigard Transportation System Plan to include recommended changes found in the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan, 2. Incorporate the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan by reference into the Tigard Transportation System Plan to serve as findings; 3. Update the recommended action measures for Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 12:Transportation to include language recommended by the Tigard 99W Plan Citizen Advisory Committee;and 4.Amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.A (under Goal 12.2) to reflect recommended 5 through lanes for Highway 99W. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 1 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project History Traffic congestion consistently ranked as the number one issue with Tigard citizens in three community surveys performed during the past three years. Citizens specifically identified congestion on Highway 99W as a major problem, and expressed great concern about its adverse effect on access to the Tigard Downtown area and the region as a whole. This highway carries 50,000 vehicles per day,half of which is regional through traffic,and is currently overwhelmed by the existing traffic volumes. At peak travel hours, cut-through traffic uses the City of Tigard's street system to avoid the Highway 99W traffic congestion. This often causes safety and livability issues in residential neighborhoods. In recognition of the citizen concerns regarding the heavy traffic congestion on Highway 99W, the Tigard City Council established a goal in 2005 to improve the Highway 99W corridor,and continued that goal into 2006. To develop solutions to the traffic congestion on the highway, the City applied for and received a Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) grant to develop the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan (Tigard 99W Plan). Through a planning and public involvement process the project developed concept-level recommendations for transportation improvements and recommended additional interventions to meet future needs in the corridor. Development of the Tigard 99W Plan included detailed analysis of needs,opportunities,market analysis of redevelopment potential in the corridor, and comparative evaluation of concept plan alternatives. The primary focus of the Tigard 99W Plan is identifying projects aimed at alleviating traffic congestion and improving traffic circulation within the highway corridor from Durham Road to the I-5 interchange. It builds on previous studies and was developed through a planning process of four key steps: • Establish inventory of existing conditions • Analyze needs,opportunities and constraints • Develop alternative improvement concepts • Compare and evaluate alternative concepts Three alternatives were evaluated to assess the impact each would have on the transportation deficiencies in the corridor.Alternative A evaluated partial widening of 99W through Tigard to seven lanes and Alternative C evaluated widening to seven lanes for the entire length. Both were rejected for cost,right-of-way impacts,and quality of life concerns.The preferred alternative (Alternative B) was an access management strategy. Alternative B proposes all transportation modes be enhanced though a series of projects over the long term,including medians, access management,intersection improvements,parallel roadway connections, and other off-highway improvements. The development of the Tigard 991V Plan included both public involvement and interagency coordination.A project citizen advisory committee (CAC) and technical advisory committee (TAC)were appointed to review and comment on the plan as it developed. In addition, three open houses and citizen stakeholder interviews were held. Both the CAC and TAC recommended that Alternative B be the preferred option. The CAC also submitted certain policy- related recommendations,with the help of ODOT staff,pertaining to the future of Highway 99W. The proposed amendments to the Tigard Transportation Plan (TSP) originate from the recommendations found in Appendix C of the Tigard 99W Plan. These recommendations are Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 2 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 intended to implement Alternative B. The CAC,TAC, City staff, and ODOT staff, all recommend City Council adopt and implement the Tigard 99W Plan. The proposed amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan include incorporating the CAC policy-related recommendations and rewording Goal 12.2,Policy 6.A to be consistent with the TSP. The Tigard City Council held a work session on the Tigard 99W Plan on November 20,2007. Council discussed the recommendations and directed staff to prepare the Tigard TSP and Comprehensive Plan amendments necessary to implement the Tigard 99W Plan and bring them before the Tigard Planning Commission. Proposal Description The City is requesting approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to: 1. Update the Tigard Transportation System Plan to include recommended changes found in the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan; 2. Incorporate the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan by reference into the Tigard Transportation System Plan to serve as findings; 3. Update the recommended action measures for Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 12: Transportation to include language recommended by the Tigard 99W Plan Citizen Advisory Committee;and 4.Amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.A of Goal 12.2 to reflect recommended 5 through lanes for Highway 99W. The proposed text amendments are represented as bold italics for proposed new language and str ik-e—tltrough for proposed deleted language. Proposed graphic changes are called out and described. Part 1: Update the Tigard Transportation System Plan to include recommended changes found in the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan; The proposed amendments are specific strikethrough and figure changes to the Tigard Transportation System Plan and found in Appendix C of the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan. The proposed amendments reflect improvements associated with Alternative B in the Tigard 99W Plan. Many of the changes are in tables or reference illustration changes and are listed below. There are 27 proposed modifications (each amendment can be found as a separate page beginning on page 7). • Proposed Amendment 1 updates the Pedestrian Action Plan List along ORE 99W to include a sidewalk project scope and cost. • Proposed Amendment 2 updates the Bicycle Master Plan description of bicycle lanes south of Gaarde/McDonald to Durham Road to note that these facilities are existing,not planned. • Proposed Amendment 3 updates the Bicycle Action Plan Improvement List and Cost. • Proposed Amendment 4, 5, 13, 17, 18, 19 and 26 advises that both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7 lanes. • Proposed Amendment 6 and 20 add intersection improvements to Durham Road and SW Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 3 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Canterbury Lane. • Proposed Amendment 7 updates potential pedestrian projects along ORE 99W to increase project scope. • Proposed Amendments 8 and 9 add pedestrian activated signalized crossings. • Proposed Amendment 11 updates a Park And Ride location. • Proposed Amendment 10 updates plan to include existing bike lanes just north of SW Greenburg Road. • Proposed Amendment 12 updates potential transit projects to implement transit queue bypass lanes along ORE 99W at several locations. • Proposed amendments 14, 15 and 16 encourage access management for highway 99W. • Proposed Amendment 21 updates the table to include specific projects and add project intersections. • Proposed Amendment 22,23 and 24 updates the Pedestrian Action Plan project list funding and implementation ranking. • Proposed Amendment 25 updates the Bicycle Action Plan funding and implementation ranking. • Proposed Amendment 27 updates the City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements table to include specific projects and add projects at the several intersections. Part 2: Incorporate the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan by reference into the Tigard Transportation System Plan to serve as findings. The Transportation Planning Rule,OAR 660 Division 12,requires local jurisdictions to prepare and adopt local transportation system plans that serve as the transportation element for their comprehensive plans (OAR 660-012-0015(4)). Since the City of Tigard proposes to amend the Tigard Transportation.System Plan (TSP) based on recommendations found in the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan,the background information needs to be adopted by reference as findings to amend the TSP. No specific text changes are needed. Part 3: Update the recommended action measures for Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 12: Transportation to include language recommended by the Tigard 99W Plan Citizen Advisory Committee. The City proposes to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan based on recommended policy-related language developed by the project's citizen advisory committee.The following 10 statements will be added to the recommended action measures found under Section 1 of the Transportation chapter. 24. Prior to implementation of projects associated with the Highway 99W Corridor Plan, especially those requiring additional right-of-way or affecting property access, there shall be established protocols whereby affected property owners or businesses are made aware of pending improvements. Those that might be affected shall be informed and asked to be involved in the project development process as early as possible. 25. The City of Tigard shall state a position that alignment of the proposed I.5/Hwy 99W Connector be established as one which reduces through traffic and&eight Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 4 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 movement on Highway 99W to the greatest extent possible;and that the City shall support this position and otherwise participate in the project as an active member of the 1-5/99W Connector Steering Committee. 26. As part of the transportation management,planning and design process, the livability benefits of future Highway 99W improvements shall be publicly discussed and evaluated 27. The City shall adopt Alternative B as part of its Transportation System Plan and prioritize its recommendations. Subsequently, the City shall, in conjunction with other agencies,jurisdictions, and stakeholders, develop action plans to implement the alternative's specific project recommendations. Action plans to implement Alternative B shall include design and engineering strategies, funding measures, and stakeholder and citizen engagement. Reasonable time frames shall be associated with the action plans. 28. Other transportation and land development projects within the vicinity of Highway 99W shall be evaluated to determine potential negative or positive impacts on the facility. Negative impacts shall be avoided or mitigated. Furthermore, it is important that solutions to Highway 99W problems be evaluated to assess impacts on other streets, and that negative impacts in these circumstances are avoided or mitigated and positive impacts promoted. 29. A land use planning effort shall be a priority for future City/state efforts to recreate the Highway 99W corridor. In particular, coordinated land use and transportation planning is essential to promote transit as a viable transportation option. 30. The City should be imaginative and "think outside the box"with the purpose of creating a safe, attractive, transit oriented, and vibrant urban corridor along Highway 99W. When there are obvious benefits to specific physical improvements, the City should request design exceptions from ODOT. 31. In the near term, the City and ODOT shall develop an Access Management Plan for Highway 99W. Each property identified as needing access management treatment shall be treated as unique.A one-size fits all approach should not be used The economic vitality of businesses is important. 32. Implementing improved transit service should be an ongoing priority with the long- term objective of light rail service along the Highway 99W corridor. If light rail is not possible within the reasonable future, then improved bus service/tubber tired vehicles shall serve as an alternative until it is. 33. Highway 99W Action Plans shall seek to enhance the economic vitality of the corridor through transportation, aesthetic land use, and other improvements. In addition, staff resources shall be committed to coordinate business development and retention activities, and aid in communication among the business community and city government. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 5 OF 33 CP:12008-00011 2/23/2009 Part 4:Amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.A of Goal 12.2 to reflect recommended five through lanes for Highway 99W. The Tigard 99W Management and Improvement Plan recommends amendments to the Tigard TSP to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current TSP designation to widen Highway 99W to seven lanes.To maintain consistency with the proposed TSP amendments, the City proposes to amend Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.A under Goal 12.2.The proposed amendment will include language to define the recommended five lanes as "through lanes". Staff feels this definition is necessary to provide the flexibility for construction of auxiliary lanes for additional intersection capacity, turn lanes, or access management. Furthermore, although the committees recommended a five-lane maximum, staff recommends that some seven lane intersection configurations may be needed for function,ingress/egress spacing,and access management. This would effectively generate four thru-lanes and up to two temporary/short duration/turn lanes for access management. Goal 12.2 Trafficways Policy 6. The City shall adopt the following transportation improvement strategy in order to accommodate planned land uses in the Tigard Triangle: A. Highway 99W should be widened to 6 5 through lanes plus auxiliary lanes through intersections throughout the study area (tool box). This improvement should be constructed in the short term. In the event that widening Highway 99 to six 5 through lanes plus auxiliary lanes through intersections is prohibitive due to physical constraints, the Dartmouth extension could potentially provide needed northeast-to-southwest travel demand. The 27 proposed amendments from Part 1 are found individually beginning on the following page. land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 6 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 1: TSP Chapter 1: Summary Committee Recommendation: Page 1-15: Pedestrian Action Plan List—Update ORE 99W sidewalk project from "McDonald to South City Limits"to "Interstate 5 to South City Limits". Update cost from $500,000 to $800,000. Rank* Project From To Cost H North Dakota Street 121st Avenue Greenburg Road $230,000 H McDonald Street ORE 99W Hall Boulevard $200,000 H Tiedeman Avenue Walnut Street Greenburg Road $350,000 H Oak Street(RTP 6019) Hall Boulevard 80th Avenue $500,000 H ORE 99W McDonald Street South City Limits $500900 Interstate 5 $800,000 M Bull Mountain Road ORE 99W Beef Bend Road $1,200,000 M Roshak Road Bull Mountain Road Scholls Ferry Road $300,000 M 121st Avenue Gaarde Street North Dakota Street $450,000 M Hunziker Street Hall Boulevard 72"d Avenue $250,000 M Washington Square Pedestrian Improvements (RTP 6022) $6,000,000 Regional Center L Taylor's Ferry Rd Washington Drive 62nd Avenue $1,000,000 L Washington Drive Hall Boulevard Taylor's Ferry Road $200,000 Subtotal $14-800�000 $12,100,000 Sidewalks to be built with Street Improvements H Bonita Road West of 72"d Avenue 72nd Avenue $50,000 H Walnut Street 135th Avenue Tiedeman Avenue $570,000 H Gaarde Street Walnut Street ORE 99W $620,000 H Hall Boulevard Scholls Ferry Road Pfaff le Street $1,000,000 H Dartmouth Street 72nd 68th Avenue $120,000 H Tigard Street 115th Street Main Street $350,000 H Burnham Street Main Street Hall Boulevard $100,000 H Fonner Street walnut Street 121st Avenue $250,000 H Commercial Street Main Street Lincoln Street $50,000 M 72nd Avenue ORE 99W Bonita Road $1,200,000 M Hall Boulevard North of Hunziker South City Limits $670,000 Street M Beef Bend Road ORE 99W Scholls Ferry Road $1,000,000 M Barrows Road Scholls Ferry Road Scholls Ferry Road (E) $950,000 (W) L 72nd Avenue Carman/Upper Durham Road $250,000 BoonesFry. Subtotal $7,180,000 Annual Sidewalk Program at$50,000 per year for 20 years $1,000,000 Action Plan Total $19,360000 $19,660,000 Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 7 Or 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 2: TSP Chapter 1: Summary Committee Recommendation: Page 1-15: Bicycle Master Plan. Update the description of bicycle lanes south of Gaarde/McDonald to Durham Road to note that these facilities are existing, not planned. DKS Associates N , i I 15 r ,a— 1 5_11 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON RN 'Ita4 -...,./ '' Transportation . . l'%- •--_~;r4 Systems Plan.1 ,� e e ' rr a en6 -+w u_. t J __,.. �w • _..e,.,,,..„as, Rpm ik„, 17.4 .,,,,:galtr,r„..„,s ,‘” lb' All6. ' i .,,, ' '-' , , pp .r.n. : fritolilif tv-iormam - In' .1 /,',.....„ .r 1 ,, 4 ., s� � 411 �n _ _ 51 -"-"-°""-- 1 2.:=1:-,'._. i s ,.► + � , „ °.�... ._. � ..�AI -- a ir ' 7 ra...got a ...- . , — Ilk fti IIP4 C 8I_ m a.,_. �l �,.�'li�l It.— 7 Ljta...= IN ;41 -_7 1 IPA ?kake PI Proposed nU '4 Amendment Figure 6-2 Y - I f I .. --- ^\- BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 6 L— e- l ') ..I ' (Framework Option) Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 8 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 3: TSP Chapter 1: Summary Committee Recommendation: Page 1-18: Bicycle Action Plan Improvement List and Cost. Update ORE 99W bike lane improvement cost from $1,300,000 to $275,000. Bicycle Action Plan Improvement List and Cost RANK* Project From To Cost H Hunziker Street Hall Boulevard 72"d Avenue $250,000 H Bonita Road 72"d Avenue West of 72"d Ave. $50,000 H Burnham Street Main Street Hall Boulevard $135,000 H Oak Street(RTP 6019) Hall Boulevard 90th Avenue $300,000 H 98th Avenue Murdock Stret Durham Road $275,000 H 92"d Avenue Durham Road Cook Park $270,000 H Tiedeman Avenue Greenburg Road Walnut Street $250,000 M 121' Avenue Walnut Street Gaarde Street $400,000 L Taylor's Ferry Road Washington Drive City Limits $500,000 L Washington Drive Hall Boulevard Taylor's Ferry Rd $100,000 L O'Mara Street McDonald Street Hall Boulevard $275,000 L Frewing Street ORE 99W O'Mara Street $150,000 Subtotal $2,955,000 H Gaarde Street Walnut Street ORE 99W $600,000 H Hall Boulevard Scholls Ferry Road Locust Street $500,000 H Greenburg Road Hall Boulevard Cascade Avenue $300,000 H ORE 99W East City Limits South City Limits $44007000 $275,000 M 72nd Avenue ORE 99W South City Limits $960,000 M Hall Boulevard Pfaff le Street Bonita Road $550,000 M Carman Drive I-5 Durham Road $200,000 M Walnut Street ORE 99W Barrows Road $1,400,000 M Barrows Road Scholls Ferry Road (W) Scholls Ferry Rd. (E) $900,000 L Bull Mountain Road 150th Avenue Beef Bend Road $550,000 L Beef Bend Road ORE 99W Scholls Ferry Rd. $1,600,000 Subtotal $8,8605000 $7,835,000 Multi-Use Pathways H Hunziker Link to LO Linkage to Kruse Way Trail in Lake Oswego $500,000 M Fanno Creek Trail Tualatin River to City Hall, ORE 99W to Tigard $3,600,000 M Tualatin River Trail Adjacent to Cook Park from Powerlines to Fanno $2,600,000 M Tualatin River Crossing Near 108th Avenue $3,000,000 L Powerlines Corridor From Beaverton to Tualatin River Trail $2,500,000 Subtotal $12,200,000 Action Plan Total x,000 $22,990,000 Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 9 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 4: TSP Chapter 1: Summary Committee Recommendation: Page 1-25: Future Streets: Where ROW is Planned for More Than Two Lanes. Update figure to change Hwy 99W from 7 lane (red line) between Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road to 5 lane (yellow).* DKS Associates 1 C it..; I l `L CITY OF TIGARD I .,.. l • ,-; I I - OREGON n - — - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I a Systems Plan - , Proposed -, 4 Amendment -_ Leyeid• `� .- Iii:-,-,__1- I .1- I _1- /u MM h , .1' Sr t "' ' I 1 "T Y I .'t— I 11`I - .1-- N. I "1, •� y, I- r l•. "'r, . .} Figure 8-11 1 1 ' ?'-'=' i cjrr-`��-7h-- s } — Future Streets Where 4 N -_ I I Ifyl` ROW is Planned for 5 _ _ More Than Two Lanes The proposed amendments relating to the lane configuration and quantity of Highway 99W have an asterisk(*) describing that the five lanes of Highway 99W in the referenced area (Highway 217 north to Interstate 5) should be defined as through lanes with the ability to use additional auxiliary lanes for additional intersection capacity, turn lanes, or access management at key locations, such as major intersections, where traffic flow and/or capacity would otherwise be constrained. For locations within 600 feet of any signalized intersection or freeway interchange, staff will determine,based on accepted engineering practices, the cross-section and auxiliary lanes that will be necessary to serve that intersection. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 10 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 5: TSP Chapter 1: Summary Committee Recommendation: Page 1-30: Street Improvement Plan(Figure). Update figure to remove 7 lane improvement along Hwy 99W from Interstate 5 to SW Greenburg Road.* OKSAssoeiates Wber h]hoes/Men y US 26 a 72nd Av 4 �, "'" CITY OF TIGARD IAH ORS Ems, _RD Transportation Propose Systems Plan a Amendmen ` S' Legend r.F'' r�. • -�" —6 ©.Nt r of Imes �.. —� i _ 11111=11•Freeway'Wdenaq ' 217 .Nea7rayWganmg 5 f'� Ayana• tu../grA xi_ _ .. RaDOSeO fiaaEr'sy © "rq�� 'F'4411 sr .Raposed Cvernos9m7 ` _rr.Apn """ef, A; Proposed Amendment 6: TSP Chapter 1: Summary Committee Recommendation: Page 1-31: Intersection Improvement Locations. Update Figure 8-20 to include intersection improvements at: • [#37] ORE 99W/SW Durham Road • [#38] ORE 99W/SW Canterbury Lane DKS Associates 41 , CITY OF TIGARD , -.:-. , Transportation I Systems Plan e , 0 ' 0 taarsedmOvowrent T '"9 ' 11: 1 16 ®.r„7:;,,v,..,,, 28 15 L 001:01, . -., 1 2. 14 (1) 1401#Sa'ar,hyorimenta wa,,,1 a so trt sone "1 at stne tn.alelecPor,Mr,,,..trent 14. ' ,4 8 i 1 , - , tD-0 zia anx■Ater, , , 6.06'C°6 ,,,■ 0 , g I - et' - 30 31 1 ., , .GARDE :7 25 _ FicaONALD 5r - - ea 1 26 g ' Proposed ... Amendment i ?.1 af,C 37_ 7,4■14lf_ KU - - 1 t a, Proposed oe: , Nun WO Amendment 1 INTERSECTION NAPROVEMBIT LOCATIONS Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 12 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 7: TSP Chapter 5: Pedestrians Committee Recommendation: Page 5-9: Table 5-2 Potential Pedestrian Projects. Update ORE 99W project from "McDonald Street to South City Limits"to "Interstate 5 to South City Limits". Table 5-2 Potential Pedestrian Projects Rank* Project From To Action Plan Projects H Taylor's Ferry Rd Washington Drive 62"0 Avenue H Washington Drive Hall Boulevard Taylor's Ferry Road H Hall Boulevard Scholls Ferry Road Pfaff le Street H Dartmouth Street 72nd 68th Avenue H 72"0 Avenue ORE 99W Bonita Road H 72"0 Avenue Carman/Upper Boones Ferry Durham Road H Hunziker Street Hall Boulevard 72"Avenue H Hall Boulevard North of Hunziker Street South City Limits H Bonita Road West of 72"0 Avenue 72"0 Avenue H McDonald Street ORE 99W Hall Boulevard H ORE 99W Interstate 5 South City Limits H Beef Bend Road ORE 99W Scholls Ferry Road H Bull Mountain Road ORE 99W Beef Bend Road H Roshak Road Bull Mountain Road Scholls Ferry Road H Barrows Road Scholls Ferry Road (West) Scholls Ferry Road (East) H Walnut Street 135'"Avenue Tiedeman Avenue H Gaarde Street Walnut Street ORE 99W H 121st Avenue Gaarde Street North Dakota Street H North Dakota Street 12181 Avenue Greenburg Road H Tiedeman Avenue Walnut Street Greenburg Road H Tigard Street 115`"Avenue Main Street H Burnham Street Main Street Hall Boulevard H Fonner Street Walnut Street 121st Avenue H Commercial Street Main Street Lincoln Street H Oak Street (RTP Hall Boulevard 80m Avenue 6019) Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 13 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendments 8 and 9: TSP Chapter 5: Pedestrians Committee Recommendation: • Page 5-1 1: Table 5-2 Potential Pedestrian Projects. Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing on Highway 99W at SW Watkins Avenue to project list with"Medium" ranking. AND • Page 5-11: Table 5-2 Potential Pedestrian Projects. Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing on Highway 99W at SW Watkins Avenue to project list with"Medium" ranking. Table 5-2 Potential Pedestrian Projects Rank* Project From To Other Potential Projects M Mistletoe Drive Hillshire Drive Benchview Terrace M Benchview Terrace White Cedar Place Bull Mountain Road M 132""Avenue Walnut Street Benchview Terrace M Menlor Lane Barrows Road Sunrise Lane M Sunrise Lane Menlor Lane 150`"Avenue M 150th Avenue Sunrise Lane Bull Mountain Road M Washington Square Pedestrian Improvements Regional Center (RTP 6022) M Tiedeman Avenue Walnut Street Existing Sidewalk to North M Watkins Avenue Park Street Walnut Street M Off-Street Multi-Use Tualatin River Crossing at approximately 108'"Avenue Path M Off-Street Multi-Use 1-5/ORE 217 Kruse Way Bridge linkage to 72"tl Avenue south of Path ORE 217 M Off-Street Multi-Use Powerline Corridor/Tualatin River/Fanno Creek/Greenway Park Path Loop M Pedestrian Highway 99W at SW 71st Avenue Activated Signalized Crossing M Pedestrian Highway 99W at SW Watkins Avenue Activated Signalized Crossing Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGI?14 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 10: TSP Chapter 6: Bicycles Committee Recommendation: Page 6-8: Figure 6-1 Bicycle Plan Alternative. Update figure to include existing bike lanes just north of SW Greenburg Road. Staff note: This recommendation will be included with the updated Transportation System Plan anticipated in late 2009. Figure 6-1 provided for reference: DKS Associates MIME �' CITY OF TIGARD +( _ Transportation 7 It - Systems Plan '(- �4 - - ern.- o i- —g— a , _aYig[Aau+m 1 —_ ...ti j.- _ \ a * o'hnsnbassg%rs croKJ IN wat v9k I \ j )- '. ' � --1 j -`+ G-ter . ' '� i ' II • . i ;g 1 ' �� I � r , l 1 ' --' iii..; 1 1 ., -�-..ii,.- -- i r_r �, t 1 / r 1 1 / Figure 61 ^ BICYCLE PLAN it ALTERNATIVE IAI Arteritts'Colkictors option) Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 15 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 11: TSP Chapter 7: Transit Committee Recommendation: Page 7-1: Paragraph 4, Line 3 Update text to "...park and ride at ORE 99W/72nd Avenue 74th Avenue)." Chapter 7 44 Transit 411.r CITY Of TIGARD MOON This chapter summarizes existing and future transit needs in the City of Tigard. The following sections outline the criteria to be used to evaluate needs, provides a number of strategies for implementing a transit plan and recommends a transit plan for the City of Tigard. The needs, criteria and strategies were identified in working with the City's TSP Task Force. This committee provided input regarding the transportation system in Tigard, specifically exploring transit needs. The methodology used to develop the transit plan combined citizen and staff input. NEEDS There are currently 12 fixed bus routes which provide service within the City of Tigard. These bus routes are summarized in Chapter 3 (Existing Conditions). There are four express routes providing service to Tigard residents (12E, 64X, 92X and 95X). Existing transit headways on bus routes in Tigard range from 10-15 minutes on Routes 12 and 92X to about 30 minutes on Routes 76 and 78 during peak commute periods. Metro's Draft Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) identifies the following routes on its Public Transportation System Map (Figure 7-1)1: • ORE 217 HCT Corridor • Greenburg/Hall/Durham HCT Corridor • ORE 99W (East of ORE 217) HCT Corridor • Hall Boulevard (North of ORE 217) Frequent Bus • Hunziker Street Frequent Bus • ORE 99W (West of ORE 217) Primary Bus • Scholls Ferry Road (East of Murray) Primary Bus • 121 st/Walnut Street Primary Bus • 68th Parkway/Hampton Street Primary Bus • 72nd Avenue (South of Hampton) Primary Bus Based upon these designations, the City of Tigard designates all bus stops on HCT Corridors and Frequent Bus routes as Major Transit Stops. In addition, all park and ride sites and transit stations are designated major transit stops (Downtown Tigard, Washington Square, park and ride at ORE 99W/7-2` e74th Avenue). While Tri-Met bus ridership in Tigard increased by 35% from 1990 to 1994 and another 15% from 1994 to 1999 (comparing 12 routes), transit ridership represents 6 percent of Tigard PM peak hour trip making. 1 Public Transportation System Map,Metro,Version 4.0, December 1, 1997. Iand Use Review Narrative City of"Tigard P.\GI',16 OF 33 CP1.2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 12: TSP Chapter 7: Transit Committee Recommendation: Page 7-9: Table 7-2 Potential Transit Projects. Update table with following potential transit project(s). Table 7-2 Potential Transit Projects Rank Project Description 1 Provide Commuter Rail As part of the Beaverton to Wilsonville Commuter Station in Tigard Rail system provide a park and ride station in downtown Tigard. Support regional study of western extensions of commuter rail service (or comparable options). 2 Provide Transit Amenities at Provide shelters, information kiosks, etc key transit Major Transit Stops routes in Tigard with land use development. Focus on development of"SMART" bus stops. 3 Improve Pedestrian Construct sidewalks, crosswalks, etc. adjacent to Connections to Transit transit routes and facilities (i.e. park-and-ride lots, Facilities bus stops, etc.). Within 1/4 mile of bus stops, focus on enhancing pedestrian access. Enhance Regional Center and Town Center pedestrian access to transit. 4 Decrease Headways Provide more frequent transit service during peak commute periods. 5 Establish Additional Transit Provide service along Durham Road and in the Routes western part of the City (i.e. Durham Road, Barrows Road, Murray/VValnut/Gaarde) . Time additional transit service to coordinate with major road extensions or street improvements. 6 Add a new Transit Center at Provide a new transit center with the development of the Murray/Scholls Town the Murray/Scholls Town Center. The Downtown Center Town Center and Washington Square Regional Center are the existing Transit Center locations. 7 Enhance transit Implement transit queue bypass lanes along ORE reliability along 99W at the following locations: regional facilities • SW Gaarde/SW McDonald Street • SW Walnut Street • SW Hall Boulevard(northbound) • SW Dartmouth Avenue (northbound) • SW 68th Avenue Work with TriMet to relocate transit stops along ORE 99W(where appropriate) to allow for far side stop operations at signalized intersections to reduce potential delay to transit operations. I and Use Review Narrative City of"Tigard PAGE 17 OF 33 CP,\2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 13: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-21: Figure 8-11 Future Streets. Where ROW is Planned for More Than Two Lanes. Updated figure to change Hwy 99W from 7 lane (red line) between Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road to 5 lane(yellow line).* DKS Associates i‘ t,� 1 I _� 4 � em OF TIOARD uq. OREGON + Proposed I Transportation '11 i Amendment m. Systems Plan —j �►• r u legend an"d Rgtt d YY+Y . *?` Ow IC- " t .4 : „ .0,,... ...-... go 00.111*. . �� a • ` 011 c N SLAM SLAM. ii ii#11V afillrelig 1 j- II ro r r 4 � .a:a,em.,earc<.wsn.c.u."r<.ie I II / .---.Oat?, , mt. rre- i • ....a..- 1,6 Z 1'.1 ' I r P, Figure 8-11 ;III ie ? - -� uu ��u," '�" Future Streets Where 1 ROW is Planned for � ' „ ,-_,----,-,711 -, A More Than Two Lanes The proposed amendments relating to the lane configuration and quantity of Highway 99W have an asterisk (*) describing that the five lanes of Highway 99W in the referenced area (Highway 217 north to Interstate 5) should be defined as through lanes with the ability to use additional auxiliary lanes for additional intersection capacity, turn lanes, or access management at key locations, such as major intersections,where traffic flow and/or capacity would otherwise be constrained. For locations within 600 feet of any signalized intersection or freeway interchange, staff will determine, based on accepted engineering practices, the cross-section and auxiliary lanes that will be necessary to serve that intersection. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 18 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 14: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-34 and 8-35: Last Paragraph. Update text to `...The TSP recommends: 1) ,- . • O '. ' ; , , .. ; , _ - , '„, - ; .• • '; . . . — , extensive intersection improvements —turning lanes;42)aggressive access management, including the development of an access management plan for the corridorL5 improvements to ORE 217 and 1-5 noted above;41)off-system improvements such as freeway improvements and arterials such as Walnut extension;and 77)consideration of a western/Yamhill County commuter rail corridor." 4. ORE 99W fails in the future without improvement. Of all the regional transportation issues in Tigard, ORE 99W is probably the closest to a"rubik's cube". Tigard depends heavily on ORE 99W as its primary arterial. There are no parallel routes to ORE 99W and its diagonal alignment and the physical features of Tigard make using ORE 99W essential for also any trip in Tigard. ORE 99W's statewide status and linkage to Yamhill County and the Oregon Coast have similar issues—the only route servicing northeast-southwest travel. The future demand for this corridor is well beyond its five lane capacity without system-wide improvements. Ten various alternatives to improving ORE 99W were investigated, ranging from the no improvement to radical capacity improvements. Table 8-5 summarizes the wide range of alternatives. Unfortunately, no one improvement results in desirable (better than level of service F) operation. The most significant finding was that no matter whether ORE 99W was widened southwest of Greenburg Road,the end result was failure. Added capacity on ORE 99W(tested by modeling seven lanes) resulted in significantly higher turning movements on/off ORE 99W and large through movements on ORE 99W. The end result was that not only would you have to widen to seven lanes but at nearly every intersection additional turning lanes were needed (double lefts, right turn) creating nearly a 10 lane cross section at intersection. And even after that the end result was level of service F conditions. Therefore the recommended approach combines several elements to produce a minimally acceptable operating condition. The TSP recommends: 1) ., , e , .. , , , - ' ;, . .,- . - -.• , '.;;;.; extensive intersection improvements— auxiliary turning and/or through lanes at key intersections on Highway 99W,-2)aggressive access management, including the development of an access management plan for the corridor;33)improvements to ORE 217 and I-5 noted above;64)off-system improvements such as freeway improvements and arterials such as Walnut extension;and 75) consideration ofa western/Yamhill County commuter rail corridor." Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 19 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 15: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-37: Last Paragraph, first bullet. Update text to "ORE 99W seven lanes access management with auxiliary turn and/or through lanes at key intersections. Tigard Triangle Area. This subarea is also subject of a recently adopted plan. The basic package of street improvements needed to mitigate level of service F conditions in this area include: • ORE 99W ncvcn lanca access management with auxiliary turn and/or through lanes at key intersections. • Dartmouth Street five lanes • 72nd Avenue five lanes • Atlanta Street extended from Haines Street to 72nd Avenue • Backage roads to ORE 99W (providing access to business but not directly on ORE 99W) Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 20 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 16: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-38: Table, third item: Update text to • . This option would limit the potential of the Tigard Triangle to serve the projected land use in the future without localized intersection improvements. These improvements could include additional approach turn and/or through lanes northbound and southbound on ORE 99W for short periods. „• . .. , ;....; ; ;.. ; .• between 15 and 217." Other options considered in this sub area included a Dartmouth to Hunziker overcrossing of ORE 217, an extension of Atlanta Street to Dartmouth Street and five lanes on ORE 99W. The following summarizes the findings of these options: Dartmouth Attracts less than 5,000 vehicles per day by itself; extend Walnut to link to Hunziker up with the overcrossing of ORE 217 and the volume increase to 8,000 ORE 217 per day. Implement complete ramp metering in the Tigard Triangle Overcrossi area (on ORE 217 and 1-5) and the volume increases to 13,000 ng vehicles per day. Most of the traffic benefits of the overcrossing are produced with the Hunziker to Hampton overcrossing and the Dartmouth to Hunziker overcrossing has limited additional benefit. Unfortunately, ORE 99W still requires mitigation with or without overcrossing; access to ORE 217 would not be allowed by ODOT due to substandard spacing resulting in unsafe operation at large expense. One option where this overcrossing may be desirable in the future would be where ramp metering is fully operational and improvements to ORE 217 include a High Occupancy Toll (HOT) or High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane alternative where direct connections to ORE 99W are desired. The Dartmouth to Hunziker overcrossing could provide access to the Tigard Triangle and ORE 99W area via drop in ramps. Therefore, a potential alignment should be preserved for future consideration (where the alignment would go through parking lots). However, the overcrossing is not part of the street improvement plan in the TSP. Atlanta While the Atlanta extension to 72nd is 10,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day Extension the segment to the south connecting to Dartmouth is well below that to level. Recent development has blocked an optimal alignment. Dartmouth Backage roads will be more effective in this setting. The TSP includes the Atlanta extension to 72nd and backage roads with redevelopment. Five lane - - _ -- - -' ••• '•• - -- _ Ae - 'e- - •:-. This ORE 99W option would limit the potential of the Tigard Triangle to serve the projected land use in the future without localized intersection improvements. These improvements could include additional approach turn and/or through lanes northbound and southbound on ORE 99W for short periods. •_ _ _ _ •_ -- e- __ _ _ •_ _ •_ land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard l'.\GE 21 OF 33 CI':\2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 17: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-42: Table 8-6 Project Number 21. Add asterisk to project description that identifies that based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan, both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five- lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7 lanes. Table 8-6 Proposed Metro and Planned CIP Projects Table 8-6 Project Project Name (Facility) Project Location Project Description Estimated No. Project Cost South Washington County Transportation Projects (RTP Round 3-1999) 18 Bonita Road Hall Boulevard to Bangy Widen to four lanes $ 8,000,000 Improvements Road 19 Durham Road Upper Boones Ferry Road Widen to five lanes $ 3,500,000 Improvements to Hall Boulevard 20 Durham Road Hall Boulevard to 99W Widen to two lanes $ 5,000,000 Improvements westbound, 1 lane eastbound, turn lane, bikeways and sidewalks 21 99W Improvements 1-5 to Highway 217 Capacity and/or safety $ 9,000,000 improvements at key intersections.* ** 22 72nd Avenue 99W to Hunziker Road Widen to five lanes $ 3,000,000 Improvements 23 72nd Avenue Hunziker Road to Bonita Widen to five lanes $ 5,000,000 Improvements Road 24 72nd Avenue Bonita Road to Durham Widen to five lanes with $ 5,000,000 Improvements Road bikeways and sidewalks 25 Upper Boones Ferry 1-5 to Durham Road Widen to five lanes $ 3,000,000 Road 26 Dartmouth Street Dartmouth Road to Hunziker Three lane extension; new $28,000,000 Extension Road Highway 217 overcrossing 27 Dartmouth Street 72nd Avenue to 68th Widen to four lanes with turn $ 500,000 Improvements Avenue lanes 28 Walnut Street Walnut Street at Gaarde Intersection improvement $ 1,358,000 Improvements, Phase 2 Street 29 Highway 217/72nd Highway 217 and 72nd Complete interchange $ 15,000,000 Avenue Interchange Avenue reconstruction with additional Improvements ramps and overcrossings 30 Scholls Ferry Road At Hall Boulevard Add SB right turn lane from $ 500,000 Intersection SB Hall Boulevard Improvement *Based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan, both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7lanes. ** The proposed amendments relating to the lane configuration and quantity of Highway 99W have an asterisk (*) describing that the five lanes of Highway 99W in the referenced area (Highway 217 north to Interstate 5) should be defined as through lanes with the ability to use additional And Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 22 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 auxiliary lanes for additional intersection capacity, turn lanes, or access management at key locations, such as major intersections,where traffic flow and/or capacity would otherwise be constrained. For locations within 600 feet of any signalized intersection or freeway interchange, staff will determine,based on accepted engineering practices, the cross-section and auxiliary lanes that will be necessary to serve that intersection. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 23 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 18: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-45: Table 8-7 Third Project Listed. Add asterisk to project description that identifies that based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan, both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five- lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7 lanes. The recommended TSP motor vehicle improvements are summarized in Table 8-7 and Figure 8-19. Several spot improvements were also identified at various intersection in Tigard and they are summarized in Figure 8-20 and Table 8-8. Prioritization should occur in coordination with the CIP Figure 8-18 Street Improvement Plan process. All improvements on arterials and collectors shall include sidewalks, bike lanes and transit facilities. These improvement lists should be used as a starting point for inclusion in regional funding programs for streets. Table 8-7 Future Street Improvements All Pro'ects include sidewalks, bic cle lanes and transit accommodations as re.uired Location Description Funding Status* 1-5 Widen to 4 plus auxiliary lanes (each direction) between Not Funded ORE 217 and I-205/Wilsonville Not in any plan Widen to 4 lanes (each direction) south to Wilsonville ORE 217 Widen to 3 lanes plus auxiliary lanes (each direction) Not Funded between US 26 and 72nd Avenue In RTP (as widening or HOV or HOT) New ORE 217/1-5 interchange between 72nd Avenue and Bangy Road Phase I Funded Phase II in RTP ORE 99W Capacity and/or safety improvements at key Not Funded intersections.* ** In prior plans Based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan, both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7lanes. **The proposed amendments relating to the lane configuration and quantity of Highway 99W have an asterisk (*) describing that the five lanes of Highway 99W in the referenced area (Highway 217 north to Interstate 5) should be defined as through lanes with the ability to use additional auxiliary lanes for additional intersection capacity, turn lanes, or access management at key locations, such as major intersections,where traffic flow and/or capacity would otherwise be constrained. For locations within 600 feet of any signalized intersection or freeway interchange, staff will determine, based on accepted engineering practices, the cross-section and auxiliary lanes that will be necessary to serve that intersection. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE.24 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 19: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-47: Figure 8-19: 20 Year Street Improvement Plan. Update figure to remove seven lane widening project from Hwy 99W. * DKS Associates 11112 .iarrn It‘ ,y usxeara,orn 1.1' CRY OF TIGARD ros we .:9 Proposed Transportation n ' i Amendment Systems Plan 5, I. , ,P, q. R 4� I �••.tl. sr ..w„ u 1 >r {-:y -.�2 41 •• . ® NurM dlane. 1. hw+rAili iN ,. ..■ t '� i RWrrNLLriy • , .•p sr 1 a' ©"' 111 '. 1 ••••.%yowl An ry veany _ _ II m h.a• s , _ • 06.J' 1 y �1JYJhmnCQdy r 115‘' '''' n r .) i 1.11;cmmggrd Mar tr7Lice ito,,,,,,\rtieH 0 I Dr 1 IF IF....".."' y r■ J J i n.+ r 11,,,!,-~ r Figure 8-19 / -�` 20 YEAR STREET / 3t0 '_'''`fib^"aFn.. , IMPROVEMENT PLAN ee i Nbenmafew Mnwmlr *The proposed amendments relating to the lane configuration and quantity of Highway 99W have an asterisk (*) describing that the five lanes of Highway 99W in the referenced area (Highway 217 north to Interstate 5) should be defined as through lanes with the ability to use additional auxiliary lanes for additional intersection capacity, turn lanes,or access management at key locations, such as major intersections,where traffic flow and/or capacity would otherwise be constrained. For locations within 600 feet of any signalized intersection or freeway interchange, staff will determine, based on accepted engineering practices, the cross-section and auxiliary lanes that will be necessary to serve that intersection. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 25 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 20: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-48: Figure 8-20 Intersection Improvement Locations. Update figure to include projects at the following intersections: #37—ORE 99W/SW Durham Road #38 —ORE 99W/SW Canterbury Lane DKS Associates =fp CRYOFTMARD Transportation Systems Plan Legend 04)IL'e":"SS1167rte:7;:l...."'"W4 Lacey, WO•Se.M1/Movements mbAl = We We rnflIco inpbart re~nee Figure 8-20 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT LOCATIONS Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 PAGE 26 OF 33 Proposed Amendment 21: TSP Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Committee Recommendation: Page 8-49 through 8-51: Table 8-8 City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements. Update table to include specific projects and add projects at the following intersections. Table 8-8 City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements No. Intersection I Desc ipt on 8 Main;Greenburg/ORE 99W • Southbound left turn lure • Retain westbound right null lane When ORE 99W widened to 7 lanes • Add eastbound left turn pocket • Add westbound left turn pocket 11 Hall/ORE 99W • Southbound right turn tale • Northbound left tun.lane • Westbound right turn medatr • Retain westbound Light tuui lane when ORE 99W widened to 7 lanes • Westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction 42 ORE 217 ND Ramps/ORE • Retain eastbound right turn lane when ORE 99W widened w 7 lanes 99W • Retain westbound right turn lane*lien ORE 99W widened to 7 lanes 13 ORE 217 SB Ramps/ORE • 2nd southbound right trio lane 99W 14 Dartmouth/ORE 99W . .... . .. .. .. - .. o • .. .. . . .. 60171 • Add southbound through lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction 15 72nd/ORE 99W • Southbound right turn lane • Northbound right turn overlap • Change to protected left turn phasing north/south • Retain eastbolald night turn lane when ORE 99W widened to'7-laites 16 68th/ORE 99W • • Southbound left tttul lane • Change to pm/In-led left tout l,l.asung noun./soup[ • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 25 ORE 99W/McDonald/ • Westbound right turn lane Gaarde • Retain eastbound right turn lane • 2nd Northbound left turn lane • 2nd Southbound left turn lane • Eastbound through lane • Westbound through lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 30 Walnut/ORE 99W .... . o .• Change to protected left turn phasing on Walnut • Add westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 37 ORE 99W/Canterbury Lane 2 • Add westbound left turn lane ORE 99W/Durham Road • Add northbound left turn lane Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 27 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 22, 23 and 24: TSP Chapter 11: Funding/Implementation Committee Recommendation: Page 11-7: Page 11-7: Table 11-4 Pedestrian Action Plan Project List • Update ORE 99W project from "McDonald Street to South City Limits" to"Interstate 5 to South City Limits". Update cost from $500,000 to $800,000. • Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing on Highway 99W at SW 71st Avenue to project list with "Medium" ranking and cost of$200,000. • Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing on Highway 99W at SW Watkins Avenue to project list with "Medium" ranking and cost of$200,000. Table 1 1-4 Pedestrian Action Plan Project List Rank* Project From To Cost H North Dakota Street 1218t Avenue Greenburg Road $230,000 H McDonald Street ORE 99W Hall Boulevard $200,000 H Tiedeman Avenue Walnut Street Greenburg Road $350,000 H Oak Street(RTP 6019) Hall Boulevard 80'"Avenue $500,000 H ORE 99W South City Limits $500■ 00 Interstate 5 $800,000 M Bull Mountain Road ORE 99W Beef Bend Road $1,200,000 M Roshak Road Bull Mountain Road Scholls Ferry Road $300,000 M 12151 Avenue Gaarde Street North Dakota Street $450,000 M Hunziker Street Hall Boulevard 72"a Avenue $250,000 M Washington Square Pedestrian Improvements (RTP 6022) $6,000,000 Regional Center L Taylor's Ferry Rd Washington Drive 62"a Avenue $1,000,000 L Washington Drive Hall Boulevard Taylor's Ferry Road $200,000 M Pedestrian Activated Highway 99W at SW $200,000 Signalized Crossing 71st Avenue M Pedestrian Activated Highway 99W at SW $200,000 Signalized Crossing Watkins Avenue Subtotal WANTON $12,500,000 Sidewalks to be built with Street Improvements H Bonita Road West of 72"d Avenue 72"a Avenue $50,000 H Walnut Street 135`"Avenue Tiedeman Avenue $570,000 H Gaarde Street Walnut Street ORE 99W $620,000 H Hall Boulevard Scholls Ferry Road Pfaffle Street $1,000,000 H Dartmouth Street 72nd 68th Avenue $120,000 H Tigard Street 115th Street Main Street $350,000 H Burnham Street Main Street H• all Boulevard $100,000 H Fonner Street walnut Street 1• 21st Avenue $250,000 H Commercial Street Main Street Lincoln Street $50,000 Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard P.AGI.28 OF 33 CP,A2008-00011 2/23/2009 Rank* Project From To Cost M 72""Avenue ORE 99W Bonita Road $1,200,000 M Hall Boulevard North of Hunziker Street South City Limits $670,000 M Beef Bend Road ORE 99W Scholls Ferry Road $1,000,000 M Barrows Road Scholls Ferry Road (W) Scholls Ferry Road $950,000 (E) L 72nd Avenue Carman/Upper Durham Road $250,000 BoonesFry. Subtotal $7,180,000 Annual Sidewalk Program at$50,000 per year for 20 years $1,000,000 Action Plan $4-973607000 Total $20,060,000 I,and Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE,29 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 25: TSP Chapter 11: Funding/Implementation Committee Recommendation: Page 11-8: Table 11-5 Bicycle Action Plan Improvement List and Cost. Update ORE 99W bike lane improvement cost from $1,300,000 to $275,000. Table 11-5 Bicycle Action Plan Improvement List and Cost Rank* Project From To Cost H Hunziker Street Hall Boulevard 72nd Avenue $250,000 H Bonita Road 72nd Avenue West of 72nd $50,000 Ave. H Burnham Street Main Street Hall Boulevard $135,000 H Oak Street (RTP 6019) Hall Boulevard 90th Avenue $300,000 H 98th Avenue Murdock Stret Durham Road $275,000 H 92nd Avenue Durham Road Cook Park $270,000 H Tiedeman Avenue Greenburg Road Walnut Street $250,000 M 121st Avenue Walnut Street Gaarde Street $400,000 L Taylor's Ferry Road Washington Drive City Limits $500,000 L Washington Drive Hall Boulevard Taylor's Ferry $100,000 Rd L O'Mara Street McDonald Street Hall Boulevard $275,000 L Frewing Street ORE 99W O'Mara Street $150,000 Subtotal $2,955,000 H Gaarde Street Walnut Street ORE 99W $600,000 H Hall Boulevard Scholls Ferry Locust Street $500,000 Road H Greenburg Road Hall Boulevard Cascade $300,000 Avenue H ORE 99W East City Limits South City $1,300,000 Limits $275,000 M ' 72nd Avenue ORE 99W South City $960,000 Limits M Hall Boulevard Pfaffle Street Bonita Road $550,000 M Carman Drive 1-5 Durham Road $200,000 M Walnut Street ORE 99W Barrows Road $1,400,000 M Barrows Road Scholls Ferry Scholls Ferry $900,000 Road (W) Rd. (E) L Bull Mountain Road 150th Avenue Beef Bend Road $550,000 L Beef Bend Road ORE 99W Scholls $1,600,000 Ferry Rd. Subtotal $8T860i000 $7,835,000 Multi-Use Pathways H Hunziker Link to LO Linkage to Kruse Way Trail in Lake $500,000 Oswego _ Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 30 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Rank* Project From To Cost M Fanno Creek Trail Tualatin River to City Hall, ORE 99W $3,600,000 to Tigard M Tualatin River Trail Adjacent to Cook Park from $2,600,000 Powerlines to Fanno M Tualatin River Crossing Near 108th Avenue $3,000,000 L Powerlines Corridor From Beaverton to Tualatin River $2,500,000 Trail Subtotal $12,200,00 0 Action Plan Total $24,0600 0 $22,990,00 0 Land Usc Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 31 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 26: TSP Chapter 11: Funding/Implementation Committee Recommendation: Page 11-9: Table 11-6 Future Street Improvements. Add asterisk to project description that identifies that based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan, both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7 lanes.** Table 11-6 Cost Location Description Estimate Funding Status* 1-5 Widen to 4 plus auxiliary lanes (each $200,000,000 Not Funded direction) between ORE 217 and 1-205 Not in any plan Provide additional throughput capacity (each $50,000,000 direction) south to Wilsonville ORE 217 Widen to 3 lanes plus auxiliary lanes (each $240,000,000 Not Funded direction) between US 26 and 72"d Avenue In RTP (as widenin or HOV or HOT) New ORE 217/1-5 interchange between 72nd Phase 1 Funded Avenue and Bangy Road $39,000,000 Phase 2 & 3 in RTI Phase 2 $15,000,000 RTP 6027 & 6028 Phase 3 ORE 99W Capacity and/or safety improvements at key $25,000,000 RTP 6039 intersections. 1-5 to ORE 99W Connector linking 1-5 and ORE 99W (model $250,000,000 RTP 6005 assumed connector would be located north (Toll Route) of Sherwood—specific location to be determined by further study) Overcrossings over 5 lane overcrossings linking Washington $40,000,000 RTP 6011 & 6052 ORE 217 Square and Cascade Avenue—one north of Scholls Ferry Road, one south of Scholls Ferry Road to Nimbus $15,000,000 RTP 6053 Connector Road Nimbus south to Greenburg *Based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan, both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7lanes. The proposed amendments relating to the lane configuration and quantity of Highway 99W have an asterisk (*) describing that the five lanes of Highway 99W in the referenced area (Highway 217 north to Interstate 5) should be defined as through lanes with the ability to use additional auxiliary lanes for additional intersection capacity, turn lanes,or access management at key locations, such as major intersections,where traffic flow and/or capacity would otherwise be constrained. For locations within 600 feet of any signalized intersection or freeway interchange, staff will determine, based on accepted engineering practices, the cross-section and auxiliary lanes that will be necessary to serve that intersection. Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 32 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 Proposed Amendment 27: TSP Chapter 11: Funding/Implementation Committee Recommendation: Page 11-11: Table 11-7 City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements. Update table to include specific projects and add projects at the following intersections: Table 11-7 City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements No. I Intersection I Description 8 Main/ • Semhbouud lefttamlane > Greenburg/ORE - - $500.000 99W • Add eastbound left turn pocket • Add westbound left turn pocket 11 Hall/ORE 99W • $3,700;000 $750,000 • Westbound right tuul uveda i • Westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction 1-2 ORE 217 NB • ' . .. .. $900;060 Ramps/ORE • Retail westbound tight ruin late when ORE 99W widened tv 7 lanez 99W • 1.d F--L l,bo- d left`---- '---- 13 ORE 217 SB $400;006 s/ORE . ... o . 99W :- 14 Dartmouth/ •.. :y o .. .. , $00;000 ORE 99W • Add southbound through lane X600,000 • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction 1 72nd/ORE 99W • Southbound right turn lane 5500;000 • Northbound right turn overlap 'i300,000 • Change to protected left turn phasing north/south • Retain eantluuud night tutu lane when ORE 99W wideiie l lu 7 haw= 16 68th/ORE 99W $1,550;000 $400,000 • Sontlibuund left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass aches in northbound and southbound directions 25 ORE 99W/ • Westbound right turn lane $'700,000 McDonald/ $1,500,000 Gaarde • Retain eastbound right turn lane • 2nd Northbound left turn lane • 2nd Southbound left turn lane • Eastbound through lane • Westbound through lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 30 Walnut/ORE 99W • Change to protected left turn phasing on Walnut 91600,006 • Add westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 37 ORE 99W/ • Add westbound left turn lane $250,000 Canterbury Lane 38 ORE 99W/ • Add northbound left turn lane $250,000 Durham Road Land Use Review Narrative City of Tigard PAGE 33 OF 33 CPA2008-00011 2/23/2009 ATTACHMENT 2 MEMORANDUM 3111 S TIGARD TO: Mayor Craig Dirksen and Members of the City Council FROM: Ron Bunch,Assistant Community Development Director Gus Duenas,City Engineer RE: Advance Information Regarding the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan—Future Council Meetings and Request for Adoption DATE: October 17,2007 INTRODUCTION Council is scheduled to hold a work session on the Tigard 99\V Improvement and Management Plan Final Report on November 20,2007. Staff wishes to provide advance information about the project and give Council an opportunity to ask questions or raise issues to staff prior to the work session. Council is receiving advance information because the project's Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) held its last meeting on September 7,2007. The CAC wished to receive the final report and a near final draft of its recommendations well in advance of Council's November 20 work session. The CAC plans to be at the work session and present these to Council. In addition,staff wishes to make this information available to Council at the same time it is provided to the CAC. We feel this is important to make it possible to respond to constituent questions,if needed. ACCOMPANYING MATERIALS AND AVAILABLE BACKGROUND INFORMATION Accompanying this memo is Attachment A: Tigard 99W Improvement Management Plan Final Report;Attachment B: October 16,2007 Memo to the CAC transmitting a draft of its recommendations;Attachment C: Meeting Notes of the CAC's September 10 Meeting,and Attachment D: List of Highway 99W Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) members. Also available from staff are notes of the CAC's previous meetings,stakeholder interview summaries, and summary results of a questionnaire administered at a community open house. Furthermore, numerous technical drafts of the 99W report are available,as well as a significant amount of technical background information. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Citizen Involvement Process and CAC Proposed Recommendations As mentioned above, this project involved a Tigard Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) composed of 11 citizens appointed by Council.This group met six times during the course 1:\I.RM.N\Ron\CAC NI6CTIN(.5\memocchnigh99uadvanccmfo fmatum.doc 1 of the project. In addition, three public open houses were held,and a number of citizen stakeholders were interviewed by the project consulting team. More time and effort was spent working with the CAC than originally anticipated by the project's scope of work. This was done because the CAC wished to do more than just advise the execution of work by project consultants and staff. The CAC wished to provide its own recommendations and insights to the City Council and not be just an accessory to the technical process. A major accomplishment of this effort was the development of the CAC's 10 recommendations pertaining to the future of Highway 99W. ODOT was also involved. Lidwien Rahman ODOT TGM Supervisor was present at the CAC's September 10,2007 meeting and helped finalize the recommendations. It is important to stress that the CAC,in addition to staff and ODOT,is recommending Council adopt and implement the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan. This will require Council to direct the Planning Commission to amend the City's Transportation Plan and to make conforming Comprehensive Plan policy changes. The following are the CAC's 10 proposed project recommendations: Proposed Highway 99W CAC Recommendations 1. Prior to implementation of projects associated with the Highway 99W Corridor Plan, especially those requiring additional right-of-way or affecting property access, there shall be established protocols whereby affected property owners or businesses are made aware of pending improvements. Those that might be affected shall be informed and asked to be involved in the project development process as early as possible. 2. The City of Tigard shall state a position that alignment of the proposed I-5 / Hwy 99W Connector be established as one which reduces through-traffic and freight movement on Highway 99W to the greatest extent possible,and that the City shall support this position, and otherwise participate in the project,as an active member of the I-5 / 99W Connector Steering Committee. 3. As part of the transportation management,planning and design process, the livability benefits of future Highway 99W improvements shall be publicly discussed and evaluated. 4. The City shall adopt Alternative B as part of its Transportation System Plan and prioritize its recommendations. Subsequently, the City shall,in conjunction with other agencies,jurisdictions, and stakeholders,develop action plans to implement the alternative's specific project recommendations. Action plans to implement Alternative B shall include design and engineering strategies, funding measures,and stakeholder and citizen engagement. Reasonable time frames shall be associated with the action plans. 5. Other transportation and land development projects within the vicinity of Highway 99W shall be evaluated to determine potential negative or positive impacts on the facility. Negative impacts shall be avoided or mitigated. Furthermore,it is important that solutions to Highway 99W problems be evaluated to assess impacts on other I:\LRPL N\Ron\CAC MEETINGS\memocchwigh99wadvance,,formanondoc 2 streets and that negative impacts in these circumstances are avoided or mitigated and positive impacts promoted. 6. A land use planning effort shall be a priority for future City / state efforts to recreate the Highway 99W corridor. In particular,coordinated land use and transportation planning is essential to promote transit as a viable transportation option. 7. The City should be imaginative and "think outside the box" with the purpose of creating a safe,attractive,transit oriented, and vibrant urban corridor along Highway 99W. When there are obvious benefits to specific physical improvements, the City should request design exceptions from ODOT. 8. In the near term, the City and ODOT shall develop an Access Management Plan for Highway 99W, Each property identified as needing access management treatment shall be treated as unique.A one-size fits all approach should not be used. The economic vitality of businesses is an important factor. 9. Implementing improved transit service should be an ongoing priority with the long- term objective of light rail service along the Highway 99W corridor. If light rail is not possible within the reasonable future then improved bus service/rubber tired vehicles shall serve as an alternative until it is. 10. Highway 99W Action Plans shall seek to enhance the economic vitality of the corridor through transportation, aesthetic,land use, and other improvements. In addition, staff resources shall be committed to coordinate business development and retention activities,and aid in communication among the business community and city government. Report Recommendations and Findings On pages 1 —3 the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan Report provides an excellent summary of why and how the project was executed. In brief, the project's purpose was to develop an improvement and management plan for Highway 99 W in Tigard because future forecasts indicate its performance will deteriorate as future trip demand grows. The Tigard 99W Plan proposes all transportation modes be enhanced through a series of projects over the long-term. For example, the Plan conceptually proposes a wide range of intersection, pedestrian/ bikeway improvements,and access management efforts. In this case, access management means working with property owners/businesses over the long term to redesign and reconfigure driveways to reduce delays and hazards associated with turning movements. In addition,medians are proposed along portions of the highway. Both the Technical and Citizen Advisory Committees have recommended that Alternative B be the preferred option. Pages 4 through 11 of the report present a summary of the rationale used to select Alternative B. The project development process also evaluated two other alternatives. Both of these alternatives focused on road widening. Alternative A evaluated partial widening of 99W through Tigard to seven lanes,and Alternative C evaluated seven-lane widening of the full length. Both of these were rejected for cost, right-of-way impacts, and quality of life concerns. I:\LRPLN\Ron\CAC MEETINGS\memocchuigh99wadvanceinfonnation.doc 3 • Tigard 99W Corridor Land Use Planning Future land use and economic development planning is important for the future of Highway 99W Corridor. However,this project did not do this. It will have to be part of a future effort. The ODOT TGM Project Manager and Technical Advisory Committee felt that the project budget and timeframe did not allow land use planning to be integrated into the project. Please note that the CAC has recommended that, "A land use planning effort shall be a priority for future City / state efforts to recreate the Highway 99W corridor." Conclusion Staff and the CAC will jointly present the report and recommendations at Council's November 20,2007 work session. Council will be requested to direct the Planning Commission to amend the City's Transportation System Plan to incorporate Alternative B's proposed projects and management measures. The CAC will also present its recommendations. It is recommended that Council consider them advisory in implementing Alternative "B". In addition,Council is requested to direct the Planning Commission,Citizen Policy Interest Team, and staff to consider them for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan's Goal 12,Transportation Chapter. Several of the statements are suitable for Action Measures,and others may serve as policies. Thank you for your attention and please feel free to contact Gus Duenas, City Engineer or myself if you have questions prior to the work session. Attachments: Attachment A:Tigard 99W Improvement Management Plan Final Report Attachment B: October 16,2007 Memo to the CAC transmitting a draft of its recommendations; Attachment C: Meeting Notes of the CAC's September 10 Meeting Attachment D: List of Highway 99W Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) members. Copy: Craig Prosser,City Manager Tom Coffee,Community Development Director Gus Duenas,City Engineer I:\LRPLN\Ron\CAC MEETINGS\lnemocchwigh99wadvancemfom,anon.doe 4 ATTACHMENT 3 • Agenda Item No. 3 - 1 . a For Agenda of t-1 C /e2, POO TIGARD CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING November 20, 2007 1. WORKSHOP MEETING 1.1 Call to Order-City Council: Mayor Dirksen called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Name Present Absent Councilor Buchner ✓ Councilor Sherwood ✓ Councilor Wilson ✓ Councilor Woodruff ✓ Mayor Dirksen ✓ 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications&Liaison Reports: Councilor Sherwood said she would comment briefly about the National League of Cities Conference at the end of the meeting. 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items: City Manager Prosser said there were none. 3. JOINT MEETING WITH PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD 6: 40 : 31 PM Public Works Director Koellermeier gave the staff report and said the joint meeting with Council was timely since the PRAB has been working hard on many issues and wanted to discuss three general topics with Council— • Developing a funding package for land acquisition • Moving ahead with a pilot City-run recreation program • Deciding whether or not to include a recreation component when updating the Parks Master Plan Tilord City Cuuneil\kLYing Minutes Nuvcmber 21),21H17 Council. The motion was approved by all CCDA Members present. Board Member Buchner yes Board Member Sherwood yes Board Member Wilson yes Board Member Woodruff yes Chair Dirksen yes 5. TIGARD 99W IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT— STAFF AND CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE(CCAC) RECOMMENDA- TIONS 9 : 17 : 0 2 PM Assistant Community Development Director Bunch said the I-Iighway 99W traffic congestion is well known and many plans have been done over the years. I-Ie said this plan is different because it provides specific policy recommendations. Mr. Bunch acknowledged City,Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for funding this study with a grant, Tri-Met,Washington County and Metro were all at the table. Staff proposes that the CAC's recommendations come to the Planning Conunission Engineer Duenas suarunarized Highway 99W issues and future needs in a Powerpoint presentation, which is available in the City Recorder's office. I-Ie said there is no one answer to the various traffic difficulties on 99W. He said the Committee created combinations of three main alternatives: • Partial Widening, • Access Management • Full Widening. Councilor Wilson said he was on the Transportation System Plan Committee in 2002 and asked what is different about this plan. Engineer Duenas said this plan contains medians and improved intersections,while maintaining a five-lane system throughout. Mayor Dirksen asked if traffic signals could be more aggressively coordinated. Engineer Duenas replied that while synchronization of the signal system is an objective, it can have the unintended effect of bogging down traffic. I-Ie said it is designed for a particrilar speed and when that speed is not achieved,it doesn't work. Mayor Dirksen asked if Council has reviewed this document and feels that they have enough information to make a decision. City Manager Prosser asked when staff would be bringing this back for formal adoption. Assistant Community Development Director Bunch said it would be back for Council review within three to four months. Councilor Wilson said he liked the direction of the recommendations but a flaw of the Study is that it considers only the pavement and not the land use aspects. He said many Tigard(:it}Cnuttcii Meeting Minutes November 31,111 17 12 of the commercial uses along 99W such as strip malls, are obsolete. He said if the priority is access control to make it easier for cars along 99W, then backage roads need consideration. He said backage roads were rejected in this report as not feasible and he disagrees. He said they would be challenging because 99W is on a diagonal but he'd like to see them affirmed as part of the plan. He said seven lanes are in the ODOT plan and if Tigard is going to give up the funds available for that widening, that money should be spent on backage roads and other considerations. •- Mayor Dirksen said ODOT will support projects off of the highway if it can be proven that they would enhance the functioning of the street. Councilor Buchner said she supported backage roads and suggested putting stronger language about them in the report and to make it a directive as part of the Land use analysis. Mayor Dirksen asked if it was possible, rather than rejecting this report because it doesn't include this consideration, for Council to call for the addition of an appendix, that would identify this as a preferred method of achieving the goals of access management. Assistant Cominunity Development Director Bunch said this is a site design issue more associated with a specific project or redevelopment. He suggested keeping the 99W Report as it is and taking on the backage roads as part of Tigard's own project specific improvements. He said requiring shared parking and connected parking of new development could be accomplished on a site by site basis. I-le said the City's Transportation System Plan is being updated and specific Language can provide direction to do this whenever possible. He said the City would need to look at its own Development Code standards in order to ensure appropriate stacking distance and side- street connectivity and then request design exceptions from ODOT if needed. In response to a question from Mayor Dirksen, Assistant Community Development Director Bunch reiterated that the backage roads/shared parking lots solution is a local response to the plan, not part of the plan and is based upon the City's own land use authorities and policies. Councilor Buchner said she disagreed and wanted to see this become part of the plan so it doesn't get lost. She said if it wasn't included she would not vote for the plan. Councilor Wilson said he agreed that these issues should be addressed. He mentioned that when looking on the Transportation and Grown Management websitc it specifically talks about coupling land use with transportation. He said their backage road option needs to become part of this ODOT funded plan. Assistant Community Director Bunch said, "My concern is one of practicality in that we do have this plan light now. We don't want to approach adoption of this plan based upon a specific element that can be accomplished through a local initiative." He said the City can accomplish these other things through another ODOT funded TGM plan Tigard's Transportation System Plan. li};ard(:av('nuncil Meeting Minutes Nnccnibcr 20,20117 13 Mayor Dirksen recommended that Councilors Buchner and Wilson work with Assistant Community Development Director Bunch to see if they can come up with a compromise. The proposed Ilighway 99W Citizen Advisory Conunittee Recommendations were presented by Mr. Bunch. A copy of these recommendations is available in the City Recorder's Office. He invited two CAC members to offer their perceptions. Jesse Black said he represented the Tigard Chamber of Commerce. He thanked Mr. Bunch and Mr. Duenas for shepherding them on this Committee. He said the City needs to come to an agreement about what the problem on 99W is. He said ODOT just wants to get more cars through Tigard but he said he feels the problem is that there is too much congestion preventing citizens from getting to one side of town to the other, to get from their homes to businesses, etc. He said over 50% of the traffic doesn't originate or terminate in Tigard. He felt the only way to solve the problem was to re-route traffic from Highway 99W to I-5 and the best bypass route is whatever can be built the soonest. FIc urged the City Council to help hurry this along. Tim McGilvery said he was the bicycle advocate on the CAC and looked to tie many things together such as the downtown development and commuter rail. He said nothing can be done here about sprawl in Sherwood but there are ways that Tigard can improve transportation alternatives for their own citizens. He urged Council to ask citizens to move around in single-occupant vehicles. He said Fanno Creek is a jewel and the Fanno Creek Trail is fantastic. IIe recommended opening the Trail under the 99W Bridge as a way to give bicycles and pedestrians a connection to the trail system without traveling on 99W. Mayor Dirksen said Tigard meets regularly with Tri-Met about improving mass transit between Tigard and downtown Portland, as well as between nearby cities. I-Ie said Council is looking at bike lanes that don't exactly match the main street grids. Mr. McGilveiy said he supported getting rid of the bike lanes on 99W. He said there may be resistance because it can be the flattest and fastest route but viable alternatives are available to 99W, which is noisy, smelly and dangerous for cyclists. I-Ie suggested developing a spoke and hub system to move citizens around. Councilor Wilson said he supported all 10 recommendations and suggested adding an eleventh - removing die bike lanes from 99W and putting them on parallel streets. He also suggested a twelfth — putting utility lines underground and adding a street tree program. He said the City was told years ago that the power lines were of too high a voltage to put underground but there wasn't the underground directional boring capacity then that is available now. He suggested the low voltage telephone and medium voltage lines could be removed from the poles since we're doing work there anyway and put underground. IIe said high voltage electrical lines could remain near the top of the pole,and street trees could be planted underneath them. 'IigtrJ City Giuncil Meeting Minutes November 211,211117 14 • Assistant Community Development Manager Bunch said working with the Tree Board might be feasible when planning the undergrounding of utilities to enhance the 99W aesthetics. 6. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 7. NON AGENDA ITEMS — City Manager Prosser asked Council to bring their calendars to the next meeting so team building and goal setting meetings can be scheduled. S. ADJOURNMENT At 10:27 p.m. Councilor Woodruff moved for adjournment. Councilor Buehner seconded the motion and all voted in favor. Yes No Councilor Woodruff ✓ Mayor Dirksen ✓ Councilor Buehner ✓ Councilor Sherwood ✓ Councilor Wilson ✓ Carol A. Krager, Deputy City Recorder Attest: Mayon, City of Tigar. Date: Tigard(:ity Council Meeting Minute:: Nino-ember 211.2007 15 Conceptual Planning and Technical Information for Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan Final Report Prepared jor: City of Tigard STAJ D 13125 SW Hall Boulevard �+APP Tigard,OR 97223 a • ! � `iiii- '1 4tt �� =- Oregon Transportation and ,,.....,... a� Growth Management Program \ 555 13th Street,NE Salem, OR 97301 f 1101 ' Prepared by: i iittli`�'�' DKS Associates `.droe 1400 SW Fifth Avenue W Suite 500 AJ *•. ` r' ' Portland, OSR 97201 s I r, - Otak, Inc. �ii .;r .` � r - 17355 SW Boones Ferry Road l � a• { Lake Oswego,OR 97035 //:' -- July 2007 Acknowledgements Project Management Team Gus Duenas,City Engineer,City of Tigard Ross Kerlin,Transportation Growth Management Program,Grant Manager Technical Advisory Committee Citizen Advisory Committee Ross Keylin, Oregon Dept. of Transportation Rex Caffall,Tigard Planning Commission Gus Duenas,City Engineer,City of Tigard Paul Owen Greg Berry,City of Tigard Tom Fergusson Ron Bunch,City of Tigard Daniel Barnes Kim McMillian,City of Tigard Jesse Black Sgt. Karl Kaufmann,Tigard Police Dept. Roger Potthoff Jane Turner/David Wells, King City Cherree Weeks Clark Berry,Washington County Tim 11/IcGilvrey Mark Turpel, Metro Steve Boughton 1 leather Boll,TriMet Sue Carver Jerry Renfro,Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue William Moss Consultant Team DKV Associates Randy McCourt, Principal Alan Snook,Transportation Planner Otak Tom Litster, Urban Planner Crista Gardner, Land Use Planner James Todd,Civil Engineering Leslie McClain, Project Assistant ECONorthwest Terry Moore, Principal Radcliffe Dacanay, Real Estate Mrkt. Analysis Rob Wyman, Real Estate Mrkt. Analysis The Tigard 99117 Improvements Plan is jinnded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management Program (TGAI), a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. This TGA9 grant is financed, in part, liy the federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Centuo, (TEA-21), local government and the State of Oregon fiords. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. Oregon Transportation and Growth\lanagement Program DKS Associates Table of Contents Section I—Introduction Section 2—Public and Agency Involvement 3 Section 3—Developing a Recommended Plan 4 Section 4—The Recommended Plan I0 Section 5—Implementation Projects 36 Appendices Appendix A—Concept Alternatives and Evaluation 38 Appendix B—Response to ODOT Technical Review Comments 71 Appendix C—Tigard Transportation System Plan Updates 75 Figures Figure I—Typical Cross Sections 12 Figure 2—Access Management I3 Figure 3—Access Management 14 Figure 4—Access Management 15 Figure 5—Access Management I6 Figure 6—Access Management I7 Figure 7—Intersections & Pedestrian Crossings 20 Figure 8—SW Durham Rd. 21 Figure 9—SW Beef Bend Rd. 22 Figure 10—SW Canturbury Ln. 23 Figure 11—SW Gaarde St./ SW McDonald St. 24 Figure 12—SW Walnut St./ SW Walnut PI. 25 Figure 13—SW Greenburg Rd./ SW Main St. 26 Figure 14—SW Hall Blvd. 27 Figure 15—SW Dartmouth St./ SW 78th Ave. 28 Figure 16—SW 72nd Ave. 29 Figure 17—SW 68th Ave / SW 69th Ave. 30 Figure I8—Relocated Bus Stops 31 Figure I9—Pedestrian Improvements 34 Figure 20—Bike Lane Improvements 35 Tables Table I—Categories of Enhancement Concepts 6 Table 2—Criteria for Evaluating and Comparing Alternatives 9 Table 3—Comparison of Evaluation Criteria by Alternative 9 Table 4—PM Peak Hour Travel Time Comparison I I Table 5— Potential Project Ranking 37 TIGARD 99\` IMPRO\ran N I & M-I\a(EMENT PLAN FIN'AI.Riu'owr Introduction The Tigard 99W Improvements and Management This report provides a summary of those steps and Plan area includes approximately four miles of descriptions and illustrations of the recommended the State I-Iighway 99W corridor between the I-5 transportation solutions. The intent of the plan is to interchange at the north end and the Durham improve safety for all modes of travel and mitigate Road/99W intersection at the south end.The the negative effects of rising trip demand in order to highway carries between 45,000 to 50,000 vehicles meet future needs of the corridor. Negative effects per day. Of those vehicle trips,53% are regional of trip demand can affect both transportation and trips not originating or ending within the study land use. corridor.The corridor has a variety of land uses with the majority focused on retail/commercial The plan can be implemented through a series services. Locally serving retail likely draws most of specific projects or new transportation customers from within a '1/4 a mile radius,while planning strategies.A prioritized list of potential big-box retail or large scale commercial uses likely improvement projects has been provided along draw customer traffic from five or more miles away. planning level costs.This is a conceptual plan; Within a 1/4 to 1/2 z mile corridor on either side of the implementation projects and related transportation highway there are significant residential uses. strategies will require further discussion and/ or approvals not yet obtained and will require Future forecasts indicate highway performance additional engineering studies. Additional will continue to deteriorate as trip demand in the community outreach to potentially affected corridor grows.The Regional Transportation Plan property owners and to the public at large will (RTP) calls for a mix of interventions to address also be required.The plan has not been reviewed rising trip demand rather than just provide new nor approved by the City Traffic Engineer or the transportation capacity.These interventions may State Traffic Engineer. Changes to Highway 99W vary from plans for mixed-use development to land must meet the standards of the ODOT Highway use and transportation strategies aimed at mitigating Design Manual or received a Design Exception growth and rising trip demand.The primary focus from the State Traffic Engineer. Additional survey, of the Tigard 99W Improvements and Management engineering design,and analysis will be required Plan is transportation strategies. to determine the feasibility and approval of the Through a planning and public involvement process proposed improvements. the project developed a concept-level recommended plan for transportation improvements and recommended additional interventions to meet future needs in the corridor. Development of the recommended plan included detailed analysis of needs,opportunities, market analysis of redevelopment potential in the corridor,and comparative evaluation of concept plan alternatives. The recommended plan was developed through a planning process of four key steps supported by a public and agency involvement effort.The planning steps were: • Establish inventory of existing conditions • Analyze needs,opportunities and constraints • Develop alternative improvement concepts • Compare and evaluate alternative concepts I t lrcgnn Transport.atiott and Growth\tana,„crnrnt Program DKS Associates Introduction Continued Project Area Map It E l4 l N WI 4:." Y2 1 j7 PROJECT AREA j j 3W DURFUW RD MOM / h iug INTER TATE 205 1 \\_...___, 1 TIGAR D 99\'IMPRU\r.arENr&MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 FINAL- REPORT Public and Agency involvement To ensure support for the recommended plan from objected to the idea of widening the corridor to community and agency stakeholders,the project seven lanes as called for in Metro's 2004 Regional included public involvement and interagency Transportation Plan (RTP). Over half were open coordination.The City of Tigard identified and to the idea of some kind of access management appointed members for both a Technical Advisory strategy. Committee (TAG) and a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC).Members of the TAG represent ODOT,Metro,TriMet,Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue,and the City of Tigard.Their project role was to meet with the consultant team during each of the four key steps to provide technical review and identify additional analysis or refinement of improvement concepts that might be needed. The CAC comprises a spectrum of citizens including business owners, neighborhood representatives,representatives from the Chamber of Commerce,and other citizen groups with an interest in the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan project.The Highway 99W Improvements and Management Plan was not intended to be a visioning process.However, the CAC provided valuable review and input for draft memoranda at the conclusion of each step in the planning process.They also provided community perspectives regarding the needs,opportunities,and constraints for improving Highway 99W as a part of the City of Tigard. In addition to the five TAC and CAC meetings, three Public Open Houses were held to engage public input at three milestones in the project: • During the needs,opportunities,and constraints step; • the alternative development step;and Intersection at SW Gaaide/SW McDonald • the alternatives evaluation step. Stakeholder interviews were conducted to offer members from the business community an opportunity to express concerns or possible solutions to the transportation problems in the j corridor. Out of twenty stakeholders invited, fourteen participated.The vast majority of ` ~ participants interviewed believed that congestion and safety was a problem that could ultimately affect their businesses. However, most of the interviewees 3 [ Orden Transports±ion and Growth ManagLrnent Y;' ;rr:u=.? DKS Associates Developing . Recommended Plan The recommended Tigard 99W Improvement and some gaps located in the north portion of the Management Plan was completed through the four corridor near Interstate 5. integrated and successive steps previously noted. Each step involved thorough analysis that resulted The transit system serves approximately 6,000 in key findings that set the stage for the next step. daily riders that board and depart buses within the Feedback from advisory committees and the public study area. Transit stops are on average 980 feet was used to refine findings of each step before apart and are typically located at or near signalized proceeding. crossings. However, there are some stop locations at unsignalized intersections requiring pedestrians to Step I: Identify Existing Conditions cross Hwy 99W to access the stops. A thorough inventory of existing transportation An inventory of driveways along Hwy 99W was conditions for the Highway 99W corridor was also conducted.The corridor has approximately 100 conducted. In addition,a review of prior studies existing driveways (most with full turn access) within was performed to help broaden the knowledge the study area. Many of these driveways occur in of the study area and roadway network and the middle and northern portions of the corridor in intersections. Inventory included existing traffic close proximity to existing signalized intersections operations (including lane geometry,historic and and existing interchanges with Hwy 217 and existing traffic volumes,and traffic travel times) Interstate 5. as well as an evaluation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit service,and intersection operations. Step 2: Identify Needs, Opportunities and 0 This inventory included intersecting local streets Constraints � and the on/off ramps for I-5 and OR 217.The This step was important in the development and findings from the inventory suggested the need for eventual evaluation of alternative concepts. Corridor multimodal transportation improvements along the deficiencies were analyzed for all modes of travel in Corridor. order to identify specific future transportation needs The analysis of the existing conditions indicates for the corridor. Future needs analysis considered a number of intersections along the corridor that the likelihood of a future 1-5 to Highway 99W fail to meet existing performance standards or are connection.The I 5/99W Connector Study is a near capacity for motor vehicle operations. Six parallel project currently underway that is detailing of the twenty study area intersections have this out the recommended roadway alignment to characteristic.These intersections act as bottlenecks connect Interstate 5 to Hwy 99W south of the study (congestion points) along the corridor that can area. As part of the future forecasting for this study, degrade travel times and produce significant delays. a generalized alignment for this project was in place Peak travel times along the corridor were also in the Metro Regional Travel Demand Model. collected and the results indicated that on average, A "toolkit"of potential improvements was it takes motor vehicles 11 to 12 minutes to traverse developed,listing the pros, cons,and applicability the corridor study area in comparison to off-peak of various enhancements. Opportunities and free flow travel times that are approximately 6 to 7 constraints for implementing enhancements were minutes. also identified.This information was used to guide In addition to the motor vehicle conditions, development of improvement alternatives in the inventories for alternative modes of travel were next step of the plan process. Preliminary criteria conducted.The results revealed a number of gaps in for evaluating and comparing conceptual alternatives the existing sidewalk system as well as substandard were also developed in Step 2. sidewalk widths. This creates a discontinuous Key needs identified included: pedestrian network along the corridor.The bicycle • network is mostly complete; however, there are Bicycle facilities— tilling in gaps in the bicycle TIGARD 99W IMPaO\t.'NrNT& MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 FINAL REPORT Developing a Recommended Plan Continued network,local/regional connectivity and suggest that Corridor redevelopment should reducing bike/vehicle conflicts. be structured and concentrated to create a commercial identity for the Corridor and • Pedestrian facilities—filling in gaps in the should be supported by a focused public policy. sidewalk network,upgrading existing sidewalks to a consistent design standard,and improved The current zoning and comprehensive plan pedestrian crossing of Highway 99W. designations within the study corridor do not encourage or require mixed use (residential and • Transit service and facilities—improving transit commercial) developments,although mixed use travel times,access to transit,driveway and transit stop conflicts and identifying poorly developments are allowed in several of the zones served transit areas. within the corridor. Instead,the current zoning and site development standards facilitate the continued • Motor vehicles—inadequate capacity at development of relatively low density residential and intersections, congestion delays for through strip commercial. travel,access locations and growing traffic volumes on side streets. As initially conceived, the Tigard 99W Improvement and Management Plan could have continued Step 2 also included a Real Estate Market Overview to examine potential land use changes. That Objectives of the overview were to evaluate examination may have resulted in recommendations potential for redevelopment in the corridor and for new zoning and/or site design guidelines,along identify opportunities for land use and site design with evaluation of the transportation impacts. regulations that may contribute to achieving project 1-Iowever,given the City of Tigard's on-going objectives. examination of current zoning as part of their Highway and auto oriented commercial Comprehensive Plan update,with expectation of development is the dominant fronting land use. staff to recommend changes, it was decided not to This automobile centered development pattern pursue a parallel study as part of this project. contributes to traffic congestion along this segment of the Highway 99W corridor. From an economic 99U%looking Northeast from Hny 217 Interchange perspective,extensive redevelopment along the corridor is not probable in the short-run. In the ., long-run,there are opportunities for redevelopment but they will be capitalized on more extensively , and more quickly if supported by targeted public investments. Following are key findings about real estate market conditions and trends: • d ecte Ex growth in Washington County and 'Expected g g t the City of Tigard suggests the possibility and need for intensifying land use in the Corridor. • Increased densities in the Corridor support regional public policy. • Improvement-to-land value ratios suggest the 1 possibility for long-run redevelopment. • Modest local retail strength and strong competition from nearby regional centers S l)rcgon Transportation and GroW th\i:uia.;cment Program DKS Associates 1114■3YGN 74113N 33311,1■Chk Developing Recommended Plan Continued Table 1:Categories of Enhancement Concepts Low Hanging Fruit I Medium Hanging Fruit I High Hanging Fruit • Access Management through • Filling in gaps of sidewalks and • Widen Hwy 99W to a seven driveway closure. bicycle network. lane facility from Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road. • Minor intersection capacity • Implementation of Intelligent improvements. Transportation Solutions along • Implement high capacity transit Hwy 99W system that services Hwy 99W. • Redesigned curb radii at intersections. • Small scale land use • Local connecting(or backage) redevelopment. roadways. • Location specific transit improvements. • Large scale redevelopment • Site design review to provide better direction for pedestrian access,bicycle amenities and transit access. Step 2 also identified a general strategy to Step 3: Alternatives Development help prioritize implementation of potential This step developed concepts that support the enhancements. The strategies were metaphorically purpose and goals of the project and address characterized as "fruits hanging from a tree." transportation deficiencies identified in the p , Descriptions of the three types of enhancements corridor. One goal of this project is to identify follow: improvements to the corridor that enhance and • "Low Hanging Fruit"—enhancements and encourage alternative modes of travel; therefore, strategies that are relatively easy to implement each alternative concept provides multimodal considering factors such as low cost, minimal enhancements that include continuous sidewalks impact to right-of-way,minimal impact to and bike lanes. modes of travel or land uses,and maximum As part of the sensitivity analysis for future perceived benefit to alternatives modes of travel conditions,various locations along Hwy 99W (non single occupancy vehicle). were looked at to see if some parallel roadway • "Medium Hanging Fruit"—enhancements connections could be made to help provide and strategies requiring additional effort to alternative travel paths to Hwy 99W for motor • implement considering factors such as a right- vehicles. Due to the diagonal orientation of Hwy of-way needs,project cost and funding,and 99W within a grid system of roadways,the potential time frame to implement. to provide or connect a parallel roadway is difficult. • "High Hanging Fruit"—enhancements Some locations had a definite potential benefit for and strategies that take a significant effort shifting traffic volumes from Hwy 99W, such as the to implement due to funding requirements, SW Walnut Street extension to the east connecting significant impacts to adjacent properties/ to SW Hunziker Road. Other locations would be right-of-way, and/or the potential for multi- more difficult to implement due to the residential jurisdictional coordination that would require a land uses adjacent to the commercial land uses that long period of time.Additionally,these projects front Hwy 99W. A parallel roadway would need typically require significant public involvement, to align through residential neighborhoods for a as well as an often complex environmental significant distance in order to provide enough of a review process to comply with the National connection to attract vehicles away from Hwy 99W Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Due to its infeasibility, the creation of frontage/ backage roads was not included in the alternatives. Trc:%,tr,99W IMMO%PATENT&MANAGEMENT PLAN 6 FEN M. REPORT Developing a Recommended Plan - - -- Continued Variations between concepts included retaining across the street).Driveways were also identified the current five-lane cross section for the highway for further examination for closure,consolidation, versus a seven-lane cross section (highway or relocation where feasible along the corridor to widening),the locations of additional travel lanes reduce turn conflicts and congestion.This would from widening, the type and location of transit apply particularly for properties with multiple improvements,and the extent of potential access driveways,access to side streets, or within 200 management strategies in the corridor.The basic feet of intersections. In this concept, the transit tools of access management were the same in each environment is enhanced by both relocating bus concept—raised medians and driveway closure/ stops and by the addition of transit queue bypasses consolidation. Variations between concepts are at five intersections: summarized below. • 68th Avenue Alternative A: Partial Widening • Dartmouth Avenue Consistent with 99W corridor improvements described in the Metro 2004 Regional Hall Boulevard Transportation Plan (RTP),this alternative would • Walnut Street widen Highway 99W to seven lanes from Interstate • 5 to SW Greenburg Road. Because this was the Gaarde/McDonald Street recommended solution for 99W in the adopted This alternative was evaluated as a"no-widening" RTP,it was necessary to include it as an alternative option with the goal of minimizing right-of- in this project in order to verify at the corridor-plan way impacts. However,it does include some level whether it should still be the recommended intersection widening to provide either new turn I solution or if another alternative would better meet lanes and/or transit queue bypass lanes (Figure 2-6). the project objectives.This alternative includes Intersections that would be widened are limited access management strategies focused within • the interchange access spacing area in the vicinity of 99W and 68th Avenue—Transit queue bypass. Highway 217 and Interstate 5. Localized intersection . 99W and Dartmouth—Transit queue bypass, capacity improvements are also included in this plan southbound through lane. to allow for adequate intersection operations. • 99W and Hall Boulevard—Transit queue An enhanced transit environment is achieved by bypass,westbound turn lane. relocating up to ten existing bus stops and adding transit queue bypass lanes at two intersections (SW Walnut Street and SW Gaarde/McDonald Bicyclists at bus stop along 99W Street). South of Greenburg Road,local capacity g � P tY' improvements are included where intersections will have future deficiencies. Alternative B: Access Management Strategy This alternative explored the effects of reducing the excessive number of driveways identified in I ' i yy Step 2. It proposes corridor-wide strategies to °' r reduce turn conflicts and congestion resulting ' from turn movements and egress and ingress - associated with those driveways. Strategies include raised medians along 40%of the corridor's length to preclude left turns (drivers would instead make U-turns at intersections to access destinations _ 'g 7 [ ()regon Transportation and ;to‘‘III Management Program DKS Associates •NOchPC.14.trh ,at Developing Recommended Plan Continued • 99W and Greenburg Road—Eastbound/ design (including a landscaped buffer) than what westbound left turn lanes. currently exists along the highway. More significant • 99W and Walnut Street—Transit queue bypass, impacts to adjacent properties would result from westbound left turn lane. areas of the highway widened to seven lanes or from additional lanes added to specific intersections • 99W and Gaarde/McDonald—Transit queue to improve the performance of vehicles and/or bypass,northbound/southbound left turn transit. lanes, eastbound/westbound through lanes and eastbound/westbound left turn lanes The final technical memorandum documenting the development of alternative concepts has been • 99W and Canterbury—Westbound left turn included in Appendix A. lane. • 99W and Beef Bend Road—Southbound right Step 4:Alternatives Evaluation turn. In Step 4 each of the three concepts was evaluated • 99W and Durham Road—Northbound left and compared by applying criteria developed turn. in Steps 2 and 3.The evaluation criteria were both qualitative (non-numerical) and quantitative Alternative C: Full Widening (calculated).The criteria used to develop alternative This alternative would widen Highway 99W to concepts are summarized in Table 2 (page 9) seven lanes for the entire length of the study and the comparative evaluation of concepts is 0 , corridor. This alternative allowed a comparison of summarized in Table 3 (page 9). As a part of this the costs and benefits of widening only a portion evaluation,building impact and right-of-way costs of the corridor(Alternative A per the RTP)versus were assigned to each concept. If the proposed widening the entire corridor(Alternative C).No improvements extended beyond the existing right- transit queue bypass lanes or turn lanes were of way,additional costs were assigned for the included as these would create excessively wide purchasing of additional right-of-way and in some pedestrian crossings that would be problematic both instances the taking of affected buildings. for pedestrians and for signal timing. 99W looking Southwest towards Hwy 217, example gap in This concept also includes limited access sidewalk network _ management strategies that will reduce the — potential for collisions as well as enhance the through capacity for vehicles. As with Concept A, access management would be limited to a 1/4 mile distance from the I-S and OR 217 interchanges. — Access management is not as aggressive as in Concept B,which proposes raised medians - - and potential driveway closures/consolidations throughout the corridor. Step 3 also completed two other significant tasks. t , First, it finalized evaluation criteria to guide development of alternatives and to comparatively evaluate alternatives. Second,the impact of each alternative on adjacent properties and buildings was mapped and compared. Some widening of the highway footprint is needed in each alternative since each alternative features a wider sidewalk Trc,:Arur 99W Iatreovr.srr:tir& 1I:Vv.1r.r.Mrr.Nr Pi.t,c 8 FINAL. REPORT Developing a Recommended .n Continued Table 2:Criteria for Evaluating and Comparing Alternatives Category Criteria Measure(s) Pedestrian • Connectivity • Adequate connections • Crossing distance • Distance in feet Itir\cic • Connectivity • Adequate connections Transit • Facilities • Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings for Stops • Bypassing queues • Enhanced Pedestrian Environment at Stops • Intersection queue lengths Motor Vehicle • Intersection operations • Level-of-service • Queuing/storage for • Volume-to-capacity vehicles • Queuing in feet Safety • Driveways and conflict • Frequency and number of occurrences points Property Impacts • Right-of-way impacted • Square feet • Building impacted Costs • Dollars • Construction and Right-of-Way • Acquisition When evaluation criteria were applied,Alternative The summary of evaluations is indicated below. B: Access Management was determined to Detailed evaluations and summary findings have best meet the criteria and project objectives while been included in Appendix A as Alternatives carrying the fewest negative impacts. Evaluation and Comparison. • 'fable 3:Comparison of Evaluation Criteria by Alternative Evaluation Criteria Concept A Concept B Concept C • Pedestrian 0 0 • Bicycle Transit 0 0 Motor Vehicle [] 0 • Safety 0 • 0 Property impacts and Cost El 0 O Overall Rating 0 0 Evaluation Seats ._ C E B U • Poor Meg! Goon 9 t rcgon'transportation and Growth\1inaLement Program ©KS Associates Developin, Recommended Plan Continued This is a conceptual plan that requires more detailed for this concept would be: analysis and refinement,which usually happens in Raised medians •the process of preliminary engineering prior to a construction project. Elements proposed that • Driveway closures, consolidation or relocation. affect ODOT facilities will require review and approval by the State Traffic/Roadway Engineer. Raised medians are recommended along most of This conceptual plan appears feasible to construct. the corridor north of SW Gaarde/SW McDonald However,issues that become apparent in a more Street,placing medians along approximately 40%of detailed refinement process may lead to plan the corridor's length. Drivers would be allowed to modifications,which may include changing or make U-turns at intersections to access destinations eliminating some design elements. across the street. Medians already in place and functioning to limit turning movements would not Specific design issues regarding the recommended be replaced as part of the is concept. However, they plan were raised by an ODOT reviewer during this are assumed to remain in place and be functional planning process. The project consultant's responses part of the access management concept. For cars are included in Appendix B. to be allowed to make a U-turn at a signalized The recommended plan retains primary features intersection, ODOT requires a minimum distance of 52 feet between the outside edge of the left of Alternative B,the "no widening"alternative. turn lane and the curb edge of the opposing lane. The plan maintains a five-lane cross section with At some intersections where improvements are enhanced continuous sidewalks,planter strips, o a proposed on 99W, attaining this minimum distance and bike lanes (Figure 1).There are exceptions to may require additional width in a raised median. the five-lane cross section at two locations. One This issue should be addressed during preliminary exception is the intersections where additional turn lanes or transit bypass lanes are proposed, engineering for intersection improvements. in which case the cross section is wider than five Raised medians can be a concern for emergency lanes.The other exception is the overpass of the vehicle turning movements in response to an existing railroad lines near downtown Tigard. incident. Final design and implementation should There is no center turn lane on the overpass and be coordinated with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue the cross section is limited to four travel lanes. Key regarding acceptable U-Turn or travel times to improvement features are: mid-intersection properties fronting the highway. It is possible the median design could allow for rolled • Access management strategy to improve safety curbs and designated turning areas across medians and reduce travel delay. for emergency vehicle use. However,emergency • Intersection improvements to reduce vehicle access needs should not be construed to congestion delay. eliminate raised medians as an effective tool in reducing travel delays and increasing safety for • Transit enhancements for travel time and { pedestrian access. typical vehicle traffic in the corridor. • Pedestrian and bike enhancements. Potential closure/consolidation of access driveways throughout the corridor is preliminary and only at the planning level (Figures 3 through 6).These are An Access Management Concept candidate properties,used only to model potential In comparison to other concepts,greater emphasis changes in traffic congestion. They do not represent is placed on an access management concept. Access an access management plan. For planning purposes, management would be applied throughout the determination of candidate properties for driveway corridor rather than limited to interchange areas for closure/consolidation was based on one or more of I-5 and OR 217.The primary implementation tools the following criteria: TIGARn 99W IMYRo r.Mrr.N r&11I NNAC.Eirr;N Pl.A f 10 FINAl. REPORT Developing a Recommended Plan Continued • Properties with multiple access points; The preparation of an access management plan properties abutting side streets that can provide includes extensive outreach and coordination with • alternative access;and affected property owners. Access management plans are often done as part of preliminary engineering • driveways within two-hundred (200) feet of prior to construction projects so that driveway congested intersections or intersections that closures and relocations can be built as part of the have higher collision rates. construction project.This process could be applied Implementing access management will have positive along the 99W corridor in Tigard or the city could effects on both corridor safety and congestion. As pursue development of an access management plan a safety improvement,it reduces vehicle collisions separate from any construction project. However, and reduces vehicle/bike and vehicle/pedestrian no construction project on 99W should proceed conflicts.As a congestion improvement,it can without an access management plan prepared in reduce delays in the corridor while retaining a five conformance with these guidelines to maximize lane cross section (the"no widening"alternative). benefits to safety and mobility: When combined with proposed intersection • Multiple driveways on 99W serving a single improvements,congestion delays can be even property should be reduced to no more than further reduced.Applying the Metro Regional Travel one driveway on 99W. Demand Model to specific corridor intersections' Properties that abut side streets should have •traffic analyses indicated an increase in travel speeds access by way of side streets and not 99W,and along the corridor due to reduced conflict points their driveway connections to 99W should be resulting from access management.This increase in closed. speeds corresponds to a potential decrease in PM peak hour travel time of approximately 8%in the • To the greatest extent possible,adjoining northbound direction and 10%in the southbound properties should share a single,consolidated direction.The travel time in the southbound driveway. In these cases,internal crossover direction is longer due to heavier volume flow easements can be used to provide access to during the PM peak period. Access management can individual properties that now rely on direct be expected to have similar benefits to travel times access to 99W. in the northbound direction during the AM peak • Determination of driveway closures and period when vehicle volumes are heavier in that relocations should consider operational needs direction. of affected businesses. Operational needs may Before access management can be implemented,an include, for example, the need for tanker truck access management plan for the corridor must be access and circulation at a gas station,but does developed. An access management plan,as defined not include the perceived need for direct vehicle by ODOT,lists specific locations for driveways and access to and from 99W driveway closures,consolidations and relocations. 7 able 4: PM Peak Hour Travel Time Comparison With and Without Access Management Direction Existing PM Peak Alternative B:WithoutAccess Alternative B:With Access Management Management Northbound 11 min 0 sec 12 min 50 sec 11 min 50 sec Southbound 12 min 30 sec 15 min 30 sec 14 min 0 sec SOURCE: DKS Associates I I t 'r&:;,•n"I:ai�>lu.1t.rnun a:id t. rowth Managt:ment 13rr,}.ram DKS Associates Figure 1 - Typical Crop Sections 1 1 tt \ ryA A 0 -If( aloft SWBEEF i'Ng0 Spy o g ,- BEryp,i0 P a t \SW HAY�5.4 - 41. Yn3 N+\ S�� q NOTE: 1, Any landscaping to be planted in the right-of--way is subject to ODOT LEGEND approval to ensure that plantings do not obscure sight distance and Center Turn Five Lane Cross Section pose a safety hazard.Landscaping is subject to a maintenance agreement between ODOT and the City of Tigard. -_- -Center Median Five Lane Cross Section -Four Lane Cross Section Rail Road Overpass 5 Lanes 5 Lanes Typical Cross Section 'A' Typical Cross Section 'B' , • - 1. • I. • 1. • , • ,/ ,P 1 ± . � 8' 4' 6' 12' 12' 16' 12' 12' 6' 4' 8' 8' 4' 6' 12' 12' Landscaped 12' 12' 6' 4' 8' Walk Planter Center Turn Planter Walk Walk Planter Median Planter Walk Lane 100' ROW 100' ROW FIGURE 0 a DKS Associates TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS 12 Figure 2 - Access Ma .gement 6 0' 750' 1500' FIGURE rinidlin7 FIGURE 5 ,\. . n C �e T G P 0 100.11 5 EP -o a y _ m \ FIGURE S 1, � D 4 T G s co G v �" 5, T 2 ■ S‘11 sy 1. 0q4) S{T pgRkST Rio'7y 01 , c) i A Sw0 o sr T!pay15 I?. FIGURE SIyMCoo"q(0 St A 3 s"`"-L MTN RO 9 l'y%i P�G s N BEEF BEND RD g 93_ 2 AO- SO / P /4:1 LEGEND FIGURE ■ -Driveway Modifications Modeled • -Study Area Intersection 0 a DKS Associates 2 TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS -Center Median 13 Figure 3 �-. 0' 200' 400' N •'• • • , A ' - i 7%.77 ■ liv,44..-= _fe, .,. ''' .1, wit ..,IP at , i.„ INI1bP' :144%*NQIIIL., , '•'•:::St. --4..iii imp..- \i t, y '- 1147F 4* - 1 :: ' 3-,- : :41:, " 4*,,,. ' A,.- . 4r A , A * . . 1.1". 'b.* - -4, °. . : ''\\ 4 , -,., - ) . • * ,.- 0i , -.„ Y 1 . �. ° �� , sa + 4111 f y / A • a-•' W., ` •R . 0441 5 ' ' 4;,.... , •.')~ft!A..1, 4 ♦ —., A V . I��y�.,��• 1 VMY- 0gai(1(y.„ .., - s ``',•: 11- -, . @,�j'{, - ., r�.�� r 'i - • g• ,._t .111•A • �,�I. ^'7 ' - -/ i.s - - ( ..-`-111LLI.y1i•• *.•�, '.`-`- .1:3 - 1- • _• i .. • J 'a•" . . w „_. -tom highway 991,4 - a, 1 _ 4013 '.. Lam_', •- •r. • ( �r .� — . �Tf'V ' ,1',i.:t-4E*1N 1 .;.4- (- Highway c C)W ..- ._ . - - ift—i.,..,!,t1; .1- 1 x•91 ‘ •' .\ M' i I • ! 6: - ,. '___ Roy Ar ti, ^ • ,1 � �' �, ..� k (iiro SO 1411 % 7 % ''''''' - a A ii • , �i , - e y � ,,� ,r A, ''' , .1k, ... •VI 4 t ' -pi .0.: . . ......4 NI ■ -- . 1. A -40. f. r a _,- ,51004. \.. Q -4 ,_ ilia,. . — * A , A NOTE •� 9 `.'�.1:., t . \ = ' • ; ,w.Red dots identify driveway modifications assumed for �,, ""' \ i_ ♦ �"� ^ y traffic modeling purposes.These driveways were ` ' N' ,"R; . - " ` 4'•,, `� �. , ;'w.- n"r A identified by applying the criteria listed under Access ,,11 a - i ' , i` . _ 4, s ` filk Management Concept.All driveways in the corridor ` _ . ) ' .� ,s, , +''4 .,: ' 4 may be subject to closure,consolidation or relocation ", - 'c: +� " �‹ ! { f $111`+"a'v when property redevelops or ed These driveway 1 '' \ .�\ .} 1 t ;. �,� • �, - - , w ua� management plan is preps y �. ,. '-'-'• . �"•' * decisions will be determined through the application of " `.. y" •'� + , - ••,• 1. Division 51 of the Oregon Administrative Rules `- t '--,. I*�4; $ ? .■ • (regulations regarding access management). ._ _ �*> ti 3w► ;-� �'' A el - LEGEND FIGURE 0 a DKS Associates 3 MIIIIMIIIMM Center Median l I Planter Strip/ Potential Driveways Affected Iii A N s P o R 1 A rl o N SOLUTION', Concrete Sidewalk by Access Management 14 Figure 4 0' 200' 400' I' 7 • '- i R"+ • . ,� .. j i7 err V L •� . • / `• r r,. ivy e. t• .l,�sl y•$ y., j A• • t l� Aj. 1 I t. 4•S' Y T•'''.�,'. �' +c ` • 'ki► • `� A,' Ire +•,,; • ' , 1 �. I ) - .' i . • 4-, 16 {I lik ✓i ': M A •. ,, ,s.�1. �•, ` III 411 1 ), _ 1....'__- '1' . �', r• lir.: . t M ` i -7 'ir1141.1 I „ \�•�C . iF 1 . , III-.1g� „ ,• •� • F F •Highwa L ;i1 ,c.17.1 qq ..fi 6 : : q•.1k .Ztaii. , ,116\-. 1 I W • v 1 •mmik, ,..iiii , _,_ ,„, 7.: ..,,,. •••,9 , , • • ..,_ . ..);*. '''. ii- • ' * .. , • ', 2'A, . A 0 .4), .6%k 1 1 pb., 1 y /\A‘ r i d �4. �• -.4 4 '• ;9 ., t , . .-. .4 li L'i• ., 4,' ./...-1',,.... :.. 7-7---N ,' --- - ..,'" 44,--\ ,-, _44 1\4\. ..-. i ,.• ., odir gr' • . ...7^ - :. . 4 ,.. ..x. •AloiL.,t f 4...„. .. ,... • , , , //mil M1 �y\ + + ,p , � 3.�' • .44�� 4447.4� '� ll!'ti Nh �, ` M —'-' , ' .r. 4! A _ .' NO IR �� I • - NOTE N.. I '..,, :' � w ` s. �'' 4 ., ,i' .' f ,../y rye �• . .,'i, A, a Red dots identify driveway modifications assumed for .. T ✓ `r� �• "� ; . traffic modeling purposes.These driveways were +" � 4 - s .� 1 �! +� �! �� _� t•�� — -►fir � � �•identified by applying the criteria listed under Access ,; • A �• �. '�'• � ► ° f .,V': I.1- l _ _:fig . , Management Concept.All driveways in the corridor . .;' r. Ai,' .- � Y/,as Ill ,.i ?� • +fit! may be subject to closure,consolidation or relocation '' •t-4:16 r '' ' / t' r ''• when property redevelops or when an access N• / • .� • r'. ,,.,, •f} l 1 .• �+, . '^' management plan is prepared.These driveway '' ; N_ 41:∎11 decisions will be determined through the application of ,l( : O. • .• �' • . _.__!--....4,_--- s~' ,1/4 Division 51 of the Oregon Administrative Rules � � !' : I.: _ 0.- (regulations regarding access management). ., •','�a- ,+r •'«a•,'-.•k LEGEND FIGURE — Center Median Planter Strip/ Potential Driveways Affected �K O R/"1SO S O U I I O S NS C 4 oncrete Sidewalk by Access Management 15 Figure 5 _ - tit •ti_rAl „ 46.414 1.. ..0' 200' 400 i 4, \ • i.•'a. �. -.MIS 4 , y. if, ' -4; i . ',At . , . , ! , ,'� A. •,. iR•r , `• .fi 'v..-ii *i \\Vr s /41;4•' "1" '.'s ._ Lt• 7 4* li, , .... .. •,-,r,,,,10. 7. 4.4. ,:„.. ,-, \ . ... . . .. „ .: , . . , id/ AI SO 4*4-40 . . , - . A''', /41 2 t P' .. Ole 40i 4$10,11,,i , c.►_. •r • �, . l `may/i .- 9•r A. ,\ ' • .-- .-L, ....1+' yF .a�• VV# a'� Y� - ' �- , �1 ''1 J 1' ♦ //`�• 1.• .n R •' i� •` ' ♦•• , r ` / ` • �j• i rs % , ✓ia '. i 1P,�� NA B4 1p.,. 11� , a t -y •i t• •..•'1�` ' •■+ r• S ; :. - t ••1 .A ` ■ • • a - !rte' - , y , —. -/ ♦,/ ��` `\�• , - i 4r: .. - - tii ,..c•-, 4 - , . - . .1. it, • • ., _ , •• .... , 4 . ' ,) ,...1" L - . • . ' tvIr • . , ..r,,a, ,--2- -• : . ' ' '. Q '4# . rr-, 1; ..".li V-_.. ,- likar-! — _..14 11111 Al. _ . 41. ,-" • . ca... t.- it. I•1-41,„.4a . 99, . . 11,,,,iiff-a•If T...„ i `` -c��3W !� -"u ,., - ` i +� _ c W Main litit.- ,�- la ` c 0,.......,!•---- . v • 4E- -4 -f fl .l r I ■�� J —t'it tel - f • •_ � r-• i '". .,--A sir• - ,. ,„ il. , —r- vi�.+� .- eel l — 1 i._ " - ' ., ice! ' • • NOTE -. - V' e / I Red dots identify driveway modifications assumed for a ?�,`0 r.', rt•'� traffic modeling purposes.These driveways were ` identified by applying the criteria listed under Access L�`+'+""�' • ! mom' �5 i a r Management Concept.All driveways in the corridor . '' •- di - - . - - ti. < • f, 0*• may be subject to closure,consolidation or relocation ...0..1. \__, when property redevelops or when an access •• r . • , management plan is prepared.These driveway decisions will be determined through the application ofia Division 51 of the Oregon Administrative Rules fV. ILL . (regulations regarding r access management). „� '.>_ • LEGEND FIGURE DKS Associates Center Median Planter Strip/ Potential Driveways Affected T R A N S P O R T A T I O N S O L U T I O N S Concrete Sidewalk ' by Access Management =Nom . 5 ...... 16 Figure 6 •�■ 0' 200' 400' �,` "s 4 , �" 'f,:•;,.. ; r , .,.7• �:+. 7119 , , t, r r R,• 'L rr•,.. / '' . ,_ . * ,l.1'. :2 ': ,,,,,A, , ,:ph,' •••• a ;, *1/4;#' 4,- 4... .,,, ' . {.$11. lii, V • .'1 *4111e; , . .P - ._,,,,•. . lei,4,0 . , 4.., 4, ,-, - 1-:-- , es, . .. .. ... ..„ . ,• t ,-- . ,G , 4• _ s - rt. . - , A ' tki. .• 7. • . , N 4 r �J, fir° IP i N ^; Ty h @ k.C--. 40„), ,vice.• , — , ,..,,.. , . i.' ' • ) , .„ op .i.v: , r 4. . . r ' 4c--,il0 r ti 1. ! `/ / " . 4 $. , ■/ • . - 40,. , 'C' ,. • +k • yj • .•. � r y �te' 1 . ' �./ .q �a , •f•• ° �j.L r 4 � `, � � , 0;4 � ' �. Highway ' 9W - , . - .t .yr . 71/0116101.... . A .4t,-."....2"."--.7Wo C. ' • -"Now 1 , 0. - • , • . ' "XI ,,,,,,cir.'; ,'-•N II I , 0 . _ , ..4).. ,, „,,-- , 40, ...----.‘ •y ..c, v , ' ter/ I v.. - ,,,,v„., ., , ., 4, ,, t 4. , E...-• ' . .:. , N 446„jelliiiiiy. • : , �. s O'.. �� ry ' ,1014 Ir ' t °,r, ft . - 4°;'" - - -' . ,, 4 r4 , _ � • •-' ! t 11• ' #i ., 4 ! iZ '' .j1` • ,r r • • 'n� {F lL sta. \ �/ + . � Iiiih '/ . "�' ' �r en mot, ' - _ ., i�!. • w• 1� .• .ti !. / , rya r - ` : - . NOTE • • • �I► t ,-,, ;4 .. tom:, a Red dots identify driveway modifications assumed for +�,"� - •,fry' ` is• �� L `` r y , Ali*M , ` traffic modeling purposes.These driveways were - .%r.�'.. , , - v • '9404 4 • • ., • . , $ „..• •, identified by applying the criteria listed under Access • •: i' �J T• k � .R4. „ e •• . i Management Concept.All driveways in the corridor ' r _ " a �'' �' � '�' x " may be subject to closure,consolidation or relocation s R.: .11,,,-..,•• r �,, . '*.�., a, , �: y• when property redevelops or when an access , � :.�„ '.; •, • ■ •` 3 :, management plan is prepared.These driveway �' �.,. -' ; N decisions will be determined through the application of - . / {' fi �� .� r�� • '.' Division 51 of the Oregon Administrative Rules �' , (regulations regarding access management). LEGEND FIGURE iiiinDKS Associates 6 Center Median 1_ - Planter Strip/ Potential Driveways Affected T R A N S P O R T A T I O N S O L U T I O N S Concrete Sidewalk by Access Management 17 Developine, Recommended Plan Continued Intersection Improvements Bypass lanes will significantly improve bus travel time along the corridor,as well as reducing vehicle Intersection improvements are focused on changes delays behind loading/unloading buses. Queue to the design of the intersection configuration bypass lanes must be designed with adequate length (primarily adding turn lanes to ensure the for buses to bypass the 95th percentile vehicle intersection meets 20-year performance standards) queues at the intersection. and transit bypass queue lanes. Nine intersections have been identified for improvements. Figures Transit stop relocations along the corridor are also 7 through 17 are conceptual illustrations of recommended (Figure 18). Relocation to a"far side" recommended changes to these intersections: stop placement at signalized intersections allows transit vehicles to clear an intersection and stop • 99W and 68th Avenue—Transit queue bypass. on the opposing side to load/unload. Passengers • 99W and Dartmouth—Transit queue bypass, crossing intersections after disembarking from a southbound through lane. bus are more visible to motorists. Queue bypass lanes with far-side stops also provide improved right • 99W and Hall Boulevard—Transit queue turn opportunities for vehicles. Detailed design bypass,westbound turn lane. and amenity upgrades for stops were not included • 99W and Greenburg Road—Eastbound/ in the recommended plan. However, a high level westbound left turn lanes. of amenities and design should be maintained throughout the corridor. 0 a • 99W and Walnut Street—Transit queue bypass,westbound left turn lane. • 99W and Gaarde/McDonald—Transit queue bypass, northbound/southbound left turn lanes,eastbound/westbound through lanes and eastbound/westbound left turn lanes • 99W and Canterbury—Westbound left turn lane. • 99W and Beef Bend Road—Southbound right turn. • 99W and Durham Road—Northbound left turn. Bus Transit Improvements The recommended plan improvements include bus transit queue bypass lanes at five intersections (Figure 18): • SW 68th Avenue • SW Dartmouth Street • SW Hall Boulevard • SW Walnut Street • SW Gaarde/McDonald Street(s). T(.ARD 99W IaMPROVEMENT&MAN&EEMENT PLAN 118 FINAS.REPORT (This page left intentionally blank) 191 Orcgori Transportation and Growth Management Program DKS Associates Figure 7 - Intersection nd Pedestrian Crossin. 0' 750' 1500' IMM77 . fIGURF 17 FIGURE 16 IPj_ FIGURE ,F 0 15 Fy ,9 , ♦ - --► FIGURE 13 .-,. V -I43 by- Air' G, �-- --� , I 111111111. y a 'EA S�t�I S i S`1� � j � FIGURE N s/o swp ,.�► 6 14 4 Est .,. FIGURE FIGURE 12 11 swk-sr a FIGURE 10 ':'� g A,. SkMcooN�osr SW 8U4 Mriy RO SW BEEF BEND RD c- 9 h FIGURE 8 .I LEGEND FIGURE • -Study Area Intersection(acceptable operations) f----- �1�,,,-Transit Queue Bypass Lane 0 a DKS Associates 7 TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS • -Conceptual Intersection Improvements e- so -New Pedestrian Crossing 20 Figure 8 - SW Durham : 07=77. 50, 100 VIN. Si i . 46 i. r' �'4y " r• Ls'.] �' 1 ar i a II E. .1. c.a filiort/ticiatarillifrie,.._ . a .4.0v–Mil- , ill ',. ". , , , . , - 0404464 4 yr•lb •:t - . ■ y Pt 14-1, -NRIt . , Ii4.• v. i . ills , 410: r il _,, ,... a •fl \ . , i \---0A61 #1.1'," itik 01111111,1k. 1114,11111 .,.A . . 40 . o ..0e -It'l' oie , ..., , 4. „,„,,,, , \,,,,,4 ... . . v • .,r, . -.009 ,,,,,m) - • '-` Ir Northbound Left Cal 1 41--- Turn Lane I l Highway 99W lit- -14 a HI•hNci 9914.. . - - ,.a,1- 1 a p.i.k f . ..• 1 • it iii, 1 I t,„, _ rcisli, ,. • . 'Ill°..' 141*' 1.- —114• il 'rj 111 r'' / VI liti ' . ' '',4, 04i°:_..„ , I . -- ' • -A • .." Igo" . 4 .., ...., , „ . ... . . . 0 2 .. it • . ,.2 . . 14110 , 4 - i %MI6"i , / /- 1'/ /, A II .. , ,,, .,,, i � : /, i • 1.-111/ -, ',11, : ...6 \ / / .. 4 mi. . 1 , )., ...: ,:: „ ., t ., ..,, 46;NOTE A r 3 . y�' -.'\ Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not * - --- . be interpreted as eliminating or impacting t+ :."0, \ ; existing driveways. �.. ! , ilk ea LEGEND FIGURE DKS Associates 8 i= I Concrete Sidewalk I--_- --- -s, Planter Stnp t - Center Median L_j Bus Stop I — — Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement limmmi to T R A N S P O R T A T I O N S O L U T I O N S 21 Figure 9 - SW Beef Be Rd a . . S 4 1 :w7./ .—'I7N7 4,,,• .i ll. Il..i ok.4... 0,.. _ . _ ,6 4.. . . 1,„,4,. .. '.',.1i.1.,.3.„•,I'_ ..7,.,...., IAi,'--"--"A. ... r,., .. 0.. ,• \,. ......,,. 0. _4 •.,,_ .,... ... A•. • , • , . ' e.c t ., ...„.,0' 50' 100 / + ,,. ,, „, ... o f 0 '_ 1 4 1 A 1 Ai . ' . 1.,„,„ • '1 a k i. '.,' . ': 17/;.." .AI 4rY.' 4fitt 0, ,ji 111011111°,,,,Ii\is 'it• l' / . ... , _ , -, % NO . ) - rielifir. . -':k� 1 r • J k y �� a .` r • • •' ,,� �� • r 0.4217 1 111 1 `�' Southbound Righ r/•. `..., •� e Turn Pocket _ r .-. 14 / A \ ■ • y il , .. . , 111.11111. . • 0• i /.! 41 ■V •••• . .T t,. 1111 IN _ - Highway ~ -- - (Rip CPW �' , : w : way , , �_1.0 i ,� � ='—_ . a 6 1 • y y c 1, 414 114 '. r - riiiirlilli .■„,...4111046.4". . N. • • 411‘ . *‘. ill .,L.: d . , • ,I oil..., 4 1- F+i • : •', ,".,,t ; � , p •-. ' ►'• ' ' - •'w '� '.mil , - _. - ' ,- . . lr `, � fi; .F,..: , ‘•, 4 04.0 .! 1.• •• 7 . • . "'1. — to , 431k, • A. •• 5 0 ,, . ' ',, ..t lit'a L.:v.* N111.1 S'.ire VA-t t NAirtPrAll`ih ,- .. (D . 4 , .. • '1 4 \ •:4:•er ,• if oi ,„ .44 . . tt 1* ,* . 4, tn ., r , 7 ' • A . 414 .... ..' . - • •■ .'',. .%. , ":,14..4. 7f, 1, ', •..' ! .", P • 7-•-• - . . ,4,..Nt .,. . ,. . .„...: . .,.„. .. ,,,...r. • 1 .i. . . -4:4, %,'exi.kir, . , ., , ,..., , , , ... . . . 11 ... , , -.. i.. . ,. \Z....4101 •k . . . % # . .i f, Pt 14 -..4.- .1 In , 10041k'1. ".,NOTE •1,+.. • � y •,.d t • ..... ''\ ` Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not y 1 \ � y N.■be interpreted as eliminating or impacting F ! ur ! • existing driveways. 3 .t, e ~J� ' I LEGEND FIGURE 0 a DKS Associates _] Concrete Sidewalk I Planter Strip Center Median i_ I Bus Stop Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement I H A N S P U H I A HUN S U L U T I O N S 9 22 Figure 10 - SW Cantur ry Ln . _4 0' S0' 100' • mi,,,..977._ -- , ......,..„....... . , •'\. , ` \ , \ �71 _` , ., \ r..` =T.',a : , NW I. ■*„' P% 1 ItAk 4 - --_; # 1, -,.., . 1 . / i , if, -.. 1 „r. 'riot.' ' . .. - ` 4 ik , , -.., . ,.. _ • 4 .., , ... .. 4 ,. _ . _ , ,_ di . vik -11.9k J _ _ . ' �� +c 10 W■II ON ■ .s — - — - -- -- -- / s. 1N. ; Highway 99W I I 11 1 11 • Highway 991"1 ,t " T _ .— .. ■ � 1 _ _ l.x .1. ■a >� r.y A'• Westbou ` , i .,• +, .. r L. ......,•. ,4 , ,,sok\ \ * _ .. - N‘late iti . . e.,1„,„. _ , .a P4 ii - *" Att.'121Vde' i l ' • F .,,4 S p � rte � Yir `'..,,,,.._ ho? ,_ 10 -= - : , , fOlossrab, i---- ,Afialk,u 1 • ), ' A __11..... .. a ...)tk k, J411111401.; .. .11kimOttiii Vipt , ,. ,,, .. 141kMalik St . ,. -■ i' lit :.„.1111-14,...'".,, .-4, 4 .- , 'lit . ..44 !if., 17111S, tT ti ` NOTE 1 ' 1 r ic 4 ,, . _ , Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not , be interpreted as eliminating or impacting �' -'2$ 1 h r existing driveways. W ; LEGEND FIGURE DKS Associates 1 1 Concrete Sidewalk I rt Planter Strip I Center Median p -1 Bus Stop Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement misommi i i T R A N S P O R T A T I O N SOLUTIONS OMINME 23 Figure 11 - SW Gaarde / SW McDonald St. ...__, GI 07.77. � x -b _ . . .4 J -... ..``±tea. , * om.Slitik Pt IA ..... 84\74. s `st . , I , r wi. ` J� \ `'.r\\ry ` y .01 .May w / , f y lir \ - ' '''10 't k itrA - 4 --oil? N AN A \\ . -A +. •.�F r ,""",/ .0 ik. ,-:1 4.0 ..� _` R �; 4 i K * \ 0 '\ ^ M,-��r y ■ III'j"'.., i e ^ I` . ^ a;Milis ..rr... . \1,• - Through Lane and * %' A" Ink Right Turn Lane r `` + - , - Add Left Turnane' •a r \ •" '�'\ 1 b•� �c ` � i dd Left Turn Lane ,. \ t ^ 4*. t. ma)11■111111111 ‘'.111,_ - _ _ _ _�.,.,,... _ - - - - -- ighwayX31 _ -1. wa - . 401101h--- AAP U* ... _ — — — — — _ _ \v.ri.--x— s %if `' \ •.► Through Lane and lIIrj 1. ir �`� .∎ : R i '"'"� -\�► l Right Turn Lane • OP Cr• lit. N- 1 -.et . • 46 . . Vill, ..i ill * ' I ,/ 0. 41 .04,, -41145 4 04 \)411:11p ' 4 Illire• -, 3 i ile% 11401411 4 AAA \ '.1/ . s. ti NOTE / ' '� , f r .• Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not +� 0 111 a >, , \.4r • be interpreted as eliminating or impacting � /4, `t �, ik ....,_'11111111elk ■existing driveways. -; f �,4 f LEGEND FIGURE q DKS Associates I Concrete Sidewalk Planter Strip t Center Median i Bus Stop Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement T R A N S P O R T A T I O N S O L U T I O N S 24 Figure 12 - SW Walnut / SW Walnut PI 0' S0' 100' m i ■ :.-.. 'I. iioni r P' c2,. Ai,' .0411*-7-- a-LI WWI_ 41r•-• \ . e "MI*. ....0.:v II i I k` 1 • 7"'y , v� �" r - y tipmi .. ?It' 1 1 Tip' ` i i-- ♦� �j liiitt ,...„ • i i ,*mg. Ce:lip . ,. _ . _ ,r, . ___. -- • , • . •,. H _ ,�. � !, iron, • h or • rim.,lilt l't,-..: ' -- is — — ' -1.112 -MU. .— —L..— ,.. w a_ � 'S— . - -- •� rl — _. —. — — 7,r — — .. - . , . .. 7. „u , 40. irm■1 itstfimi.l. . .m..17.m7A-: ... .,, V Iii.:.: .. ‘- - f r-1 . • yy n. . ..‘„4,4°. i . .,,i . _ • .• lett. Westbound Left Ni. • • C A ._.. I s , _ Tur ane ' ti _ �,�. .c. . Y ,. ti, _ A, . 1 . -if - 01 ii . SI . 9 •• It yah' I a LP _,' V IIPII k.,_........................ . :.-, _— _ t.. t^ a-�^ d, „ d r .f t �1 , • t -- .• ' � f', „ imiN4 ,. - % . , lk i II.. t : , ..... , - ., ,,,,,,NOTE a '�' y _ to 4t3f Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not .� r ��• be interpreted as eliminating or impacting "� r- " �� r a _ 446,4 Ur existing driveways. LEGEND FIGURE 1 0 ` DKS Associates Concrete Sidewalk lam:M J r Planter Strip ,---- Center Median I Bus Stop Queue Bypass Lane w__■` Geometry Improvement T H n N S P 0 H T A I I o N S O L U T I O N S 25 Figure 13 - SW Greenly 'g Rd / SW Main St P"'.' I r" ' 1 , ;1T 0' 50' 100' ■ III �'•tik \ ti ,. - •• +Iwo t i C2 dile , 407 0 `s ' \ , , 4 . --;' t SI r , tillibb t41"1 \ ' • , 4` 01 ,N t. f _, 1 / •� to,' r � . W ?, CO 0t �� .�,, .•;� �J� • '' ri 1 ' . r V' ..• ■\I�t� 1 . w • ,gill',.• . v . 9 ' i 11 Rib 1 .,, , 1 i �, ' 1 r i Yr. ,f L di �7 _tom 1 — — 7• v -. sr.. - —e ,., .-- . 1 - , . ) 111 . .-. !.. . ...- . # ` Irak / / • r •r ' \111, , '• • f' f • /' �+ . . r � ,°'1 est and Left " f+ 4a' "► .,r- • i, I � .' 1 sue' 7"_ 1- p 4 .° V 4iiii r i ; , Turn Lane , . . _ _ i f 4, 40.1 ,.... NI )11/' .4 I.0 1 . 1.. ' 4: it I. r h • L .��r ♦ r Sr.r •r ' 0 / • NOTE , �p j 4," 1► ."" Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not to , .., f,� 0� .N . . be interpreted as eliminating or impacting ' • 0..; '� existing driveways. ♦ ••' ,,, ( ,`I +, LEGEND FIGURE 1 a DKS Associates Concrete Sidewalk _- Planter Strip 7 Center Median i 1 Bus Stop Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement TRANSPORTATION S O UT o ra S mom Figure 14 - SW Hall BIN _ sir \ 0' 50' 100' I 1 / < + , r os 1 I Aar I . I .� r , , .r . • , , , . N r . •_ ! 4P .• , 40, i ; • , ..2\1\ I . , ' • / , N, I 0111 lir . *i_ • • . jik.. 111110%,* i 6 I rir-- - ' 4. . _______ ,., • . .. .. , _ . .., . . , , ... 01, i --r i0 • -stbound Rightt '1 4.I. .. .r . . ., L -, , ,• Turn Lane / , . f •r 'y tit"! //�� ,, r r i t 14 00/ 4t.. /i ir NI I • :' .5, ' • _ _ � . ;.. _ _ . -tas a u / �' r I ... , -� .+• t II- 1WaU I,P-l.•r1- --- 1 I•�� _ •.•I y. -� !' t ` . estbound Left *• :,w ,w 0 101 e Turn Lane i. • fl • .eillipti A. pr tc, - . RI*4: 11 1 # 4,:: 41). e rwe i r -,,e'' - 'J• ilk leik r C3 dr .."' IN I I •'it ti 1 i:- / ° , , 11111W.S-4,..,... • • I' illir . .. . .. — ... .. ..,trelle...., .... j s _ ....,444,46,6, AIL .. • _ " , ,44 • •NOTE „ -� .,. 1 ilit .Sidewalk/Planterimpiovements should not J � r r ,- be interpreted as eliminating or impacting .I r*'^ 1 •r. r existing driveways. ` • LEGEND FIGURE DKS Associates 1 4 Concrete Sidewalk gramowsw Planter Strip C _ Center Median I I Bus Stop w- • ,-- Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement mom= THANS1'0111AllUN S O L U I I O N S memo ini IMMIN II Figure 15 - SW Dartmc h St I SW 78th Ave o' =50' goo' 10.4, • ''" �- • ,`. 11 «yl r ` f•••.- ■ / ' iiit ,e. " . . .40/ -., . , /.. / IN 41 fog\ , el -.a• - " , •- " s NN, . "":006 .. • INV/ / /- 11141400,7 `-) 0 -:: '''w' . , `r .4 j ///WW 4, ■ • a• ..,, . f V. • , 1111446 i , ' 7, - ` r � .4 ; c j •fir, • (�' ..t• Ap.Illr �R�.. 4 r " S• . . '�. Id Through Lane �. 'It$ . ti.:p.t,,, "lbs' p �! • • •i — — — — , ` I " 4,►1 w � - it 1 p ,fit4 e. 1► � 1 ix i - • , , " ...... . ,I- . 1.... ,,,4:. F .,,r r lb t 2 A. 11 t • ,. Is k. ` • a a• ` + ^ a IPA I� I , ". r ,.. ..• ' . .111g.Ota, ' 4.'''l•-• qr... % , A 4,4 r 4:4 . t / 1 it(t414\1 II , lw ' / 1,,w. ,A w ' , ir ONNNV , h' NOTE •v� _ �� • l Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not H '* - - •' 1 4► '�•• be interpreted as eliminating or impacting •' ~• existing driveways. .fib • ‘11) r Si LEGEND FIGURE 0 a r DKS Associates i ! Concrete Sidewalk 1 -_ _ A l Planter Strip I i Center Median I I Bus Stop Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement I H n N,P o H r n I 1 o N S o L u I o N IMMO 1 28 Figure 16 - SW 72nd P • IF,' ,„ ..... , 4 , -.• •.- ....... . ' 77..775o. wo o. . NN. , it' • • Akid10 0‘. difily it . ctii) . , . , .. . • .. it, N-- / c..-, .. 011 '1 ,., _ . _ N ' ,.. • . „ ' (..4 .111. .. * ... ...., • ' 4•#1,1 .• r --4 - - V . .. ,% , . .. , .. , , • • • • t.000.des , Ni, '1,?■* ..'w ,° , .4,. ,'/Aif . . . /. e .'Jr . Ma ,..e. , . fi , 4, IPAk, . ■ . . •; ,'ef .% • • ' . .4 - ' ilk 1014 • 7.,. ..A■ . . , . •r.,1 Of ' a ,.*'., , Ae. . • f. r" .4 - r / •k ' .‘ ., • . . „, •.,, -rt • ,e,slito 4 40. * ,,'' • • or/I - % 1 ,Z ,,, / 4 , ,s • ."t . ,... „,.... , ., . ..., dr,-'' .... . .., / . 41$1 .:i •■ . 7 0 • / N / lip •. • ' ,. it" ` ' ,y 1 ' 40.• 4.9„;.. ,.,. ,-, - i 9) ' .., ow • . , :' ''' . • • - - e V6 4/ -#10 . t e " - .4 A . 4/ , ... '14p if:: / N, 4, 0 . It' 1 lb'N ,. . fr Ok-liik• .r.t Nt . • * , . ...... , : .. . • $ 4, • • (i) •4g, / jik . .• ,,gb% ' ''.. '' eZ ,., O, . . -, • 1.. ,or , > ID' 'Or' - - 4 if . • x, 1 ., ••,,, ., . • /1....,-,. • . , .,...,,,,,, •,,,,,, ..,. x- -• • -36-• ....... \ f 4f.tP ,j" . .. / ... ... / t f 4 , .4. .., ..). vormiLiv, . 4r SOUttitX)).ind Rig • F.- ., ., ...',%, "; •_, 1 4. ... (I/ ■0, . /< Ar ' e' .1"..' • 4, i\ . 0 ,,f Turn Pocket ! , ., 1 . . , 1 ,. . r . „ fN I ,.. ,...N.,-, , ...... . t, . . .. .- - , , . ...... .. glit, . 0 • i . ;et . • ,• (f) N..;40' N / s / i / I. • la •• 44 ° ' , t 1 ‘ \\\\\ \ . \\\ \\A\ ' • . • / —■4.. .. ‘. VC\ 1 . r11•1111,4 4 ' ---r./a I.+ or...■■■■,.-- ,................./ a _ _ . _. . , , _ - - , , .., ikkk............ ,...... ............._ _ . ..., ...,. _ , _ - - - _ _ _ .. /,..- --_-- — "Uk-2,Thay CPR r . - — 1 , ... ...... -- ow- . . .. ff \* -. ........_ ..____ .. i- 1/ r • NE. _N • • 1 a, • ili • , .., ._ ._..._,....rmiumi . - ,.. if / '1 1 Ilt i g 0 •P • 1 - it . lik■ I III sie '°.' a. Ite Ai;.11111t • I, , .. _ , .Joe t— r. ...• ..• . 0 : A to011.111111111 3 .. . . ' • xi • 1 .... / 11... 4 r•.; - 1,., for . ---(1 t !.., I :I° '/(1, . - t11110 1 r/1 . ..,........ , ,_ ,. . 41* (4. dr 11# • 40400 -, - - t or 10171' , 4N‘',.. . .... -.. -.... .. •Iirt.: ' 0 1111 Ilk Niiiiho/: f - i III, .., • ## AIL., ,V, ' \ •k , ,•. • a " S. it 41111r 40t414- ... lift: I I NN 4 411IP • 4* - - I .1 • ' .4 gor,•- . .. 411P/ • • - 'St 40, Ag i.. it. 4 'let ... , ,... ,.,Sio, - ,'.■ ' I Nib,4 •10r ill _... .. . 11P. iiv• 4r, r • ,.. ' . if•i• h .6 * . es , , A .. . - ,........,_ p., NA., ,. A I r . ' --, • Ilk .. . NOTE ... (,,, / 444t1 Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not f ' - . 4111114ki • , i • 402:04,1 iii--‘11 be interpreted as eliminating or impacting , — , I.*- ' •I• i •• . - i 41, „..,444•Alip existing driveways. - 41 . . . . . _ LEGEND FIGURE DKS Associates Concrete Sidewalk [ Planter Strip L 1 Center Median 1 Bus Stop Queue Bypass Lane L N Geometry Improvement MNom=INmi IHANSPORIATION SOLiiimr‘s 11 ■MIINI 29 Figure 17 - SW 68th AI r SW 69th Ave OP°. 'i 'tt fty.,' •%, , * , 4.-1 rmimr750' 1 00 f II \ 1' . .V. . V 4-i . , . S-4. .� t r ,mac „ , _ �, _ .-to, s . * A - /41.,. — -la rt.T1 • vr' p , .frsot �'* • I_ /emu . y. . ` /1 1 4**'• r • e • .‘ t. / up, 0414 . ' W 1 / CAI . IA . 411 40” 1 . ,.. 4_ " - • " " ' 114/17111111717 I)r ■i . . . ON ' ' to ' iff :,.. ,0`.,11 . ill V ' ,. .s. 4 "(` 4 ` ^ • �� / Ai sz s t ♦ ovi , -Ilk. .' 0,•L; % * . . 7 • " •.! 'ir :mu -A., 't.'"' I • iiiii . '4. , ,. ' i --- —- , — — ,, __ __ . , , ,, ., Aor • VP ID • ■ --- _ • , I 1.4 lit * n , . , Nis.;,,•;e-',-. ,. .' N,, ,. 4:. ..,:re .....,, rr VW / ' . Ar• , . 0',:/ • s_1( ' ., .,0,\?, :.*:4iii/cs /. , 4/_ : 4 ii ,_ (...,4 . _., .._ . - _ ., . '''...f. -OW ' : ./,iw.al L'•'141, ; 4 ,ioe 0 0•>,:.,, 1, • . . 1 -., •._ r ilii 1101: ,, ''"- .. . -...,,, -46.1 . 1 .. .0 ' •,.) yl. '. . ■.‘ ,%,* ..' . " ' fit , . N. / '•111 'h i' • * . • ' V 41:04; ad iii r. .. .1 . _ - . . • t., NOTE -�, •� ` '� qtr �►, r' _�'.w a IP itk 1 k Sidewalk/Planter improvements should not A !� be interpreted as eliminating or impacting • ~ « , ` r,�`< r' , & iv. existing driveways. _. '�- 4. t �- _ ,� - _Ailli ?:. 1•1:,*/:., ■ -- tf.it i LEGEND FIGURE Concrete Sidewalk k Planter Strip I _-- ; Center Median Bus Stop I Queue Bypass Lane ® Geometry Improvement 1 7 30 Figure 18 - Relocated s Stops \ 0' 750' 500' 111:100 FIGURE 17 FIGURE 16 FIGURE ti ` , 15 a 4--- --� • 6 • FIGURE C s 13 t Q ). 4 . i y a, . a g y G m •. me sf sW 01NSS A- y spy FIGURE _. O Sky sr 6 14 eir A. •' • FIGURE. 12 FIGURE EG 11 • E m w-'1106 sr � A FIGURE . 10 A' 'SW 41cockto Sit BULL MTry RD ,r $L co P(13 P SW BEEF BEND RD .4 !y FIGURE 9 RG8 URE • I ...: LEGEND ^,�,, FIGURE • -Study Area Intersection t----* -Transit Queue Bypass and New Bus Stop Location 0 a DKS Associates TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS O -New Bus Stop Locations 18 31 Developing Recommended Plan Continued The Future of High Capacity Transit in the Gaps in the existing networks were identified in 99W Corridor Step 2: Existing Conditions Analysis. The issue of High Capacity Transit (HCT) in the • Upgrading current sidewalks as necessary to 99W Corridor was raised by the TAC and CAC meet the proposed design standard of eight- as well as the general public. Metro's Regional foot walkway and four-foot landscape strip. Transportation Plan (RTP) identifies 99W as a high Pedestrian crossing improvements. •capacity transit corridor. However, the RTP does not indicate the specific mode of high-capacity Filling in the gaps in the existing sidewalks system transit,and it indicates such transit improvements will provide pedestrian connectivity along the on 99W as lower-priority, to be achieved in the corridor.The recommended sidewalk design longer term,rather than being a higher-priority, (for filling in the gaps and for upgrading existing short-term project. Because there is no specificity sidewalks) is an eight-foot walkway and four-foot or certainty with regard to HCT,it was not reflected landscape strip. Sidewalks segments that meet or in the evaluation criteria or listed as a transportation exceed these standards would not be reconstructed. improvement as part of this project. The recommended plan also provides pedestrian Three types of transit modes or facilities are advantages by avoiding seven lane highway generally considered to provide high-capacity widening.Widening intersections increases the transit, or HCT. They are Bus Rapid Transit(BRT), time required for pedestrians to cross,which in Dedicated Busway, or Light Rail Transit (LRT). turn requires longer red lights at traffic signals. p F1 Each mode usually requires a dedicated lane, free Longer red times can affect the roadway's efficiency of any other through vehicle traffic, to function for through travel.The plan also provides raised effectively. Different design standards apply to each medians along a significant portion of the corridor. mode;which in turn can affect lane and overall This allows for potential pedestrian refuges for right-of-way widths. Widening the highway to seven crossing at unsignalized intersections. lanes does not guarantee that an HCT facility could Two specific locations are recommended for new fit in the right-of-way. pedestrian activated signalized crossings.These Retaining a five-lane cross section with an access two locations are at SW 71st Avenue and SW management focus does not preclude future HCT. Watkins Avenue intersection.The 71st Avenue When plans for HCT become more specific with location improves pedestrian access to an existing a selected mode and vehicle type,assessments of transit stop. SW Watkins Avenue improves right-of-way needs and other impacts can be made pedestrian access where current intersection at that time along with preliminary alignments and spacing significantly exceeds accepted standards for proposed station locations. Until that occurs, the convenient pedestrian crossing. Implementation of City of Tigard might consider strategies such as these (as well as design components) would need to building setbacks for new development to preserve be determined at a later time when an engineering physical space for right-of-way expansion to include study is completed to determine if the locations HCT in the future. If anything,access management meet warrants for pedestrian crossings as well as strategies may become even more aggressive if HCT what type of crossing treatment is most appropriate is implemented. for the safest design possible. Final design of the new pedestrian crossings will be subject to ODOT Pedestrian Improvements approval. Meeting signal warrants and spacing requirements may limit or preclude where additional Enhancing the pedestrian environment involves signalized intersections could be implemented. three key improvements (Figure 19): Access management strategies for closing or • Fill in the gaps in the existing sidewalk system. consolidating driveway's will also reduce potential TIGARD 99W IMI'm)VEMEN1 & \I Nkl.LMMENi PLAN 32 FIN NI. REPORT Developing a Recommended Plan Continued bike/vehicle conflicts thereby improving safety • Installation of secure bicycle lockers that could for both users. Pedestrians accessing transit stops be implemented through redevelopment of will also benefit from reduced conflicts between properties along(or near) Hwy 99W stop locations and driveways located near those stops.This will be a significant improvement in the pedestrian environment for transit. The continuous landscape planter strip as part of Example wmfrnding.rignage the sidewalk enhancements provides an opportunity �= " to add tree canopy or understory planting to the r edges of the corridor.This enhancement has R` visual appeal and would add walking comfort for ` pedestrians. Any landscaping to be planted in the } right-of-way is subject to ODOT approval to ensure 1 ; that plantings do not obscure sight distance and ;' r `.1":.!4,6-1,-.7-10: li\g::::00, pose a safety hazard. Also,landscaping is subject to a maintenance agreement to ensure that ODOT is rAl w� a not responsible for maintenance. 0`1�' '� f Bicycle Improvements , =` """"""F''" Recommended bicycle improvements include �s r t• r , filling in the missing gaps in the highway bike lanes , (identified in Step: 2 Existing Conditions) and f '-'s upgrading the railroad overpass with bike facilities (Figure 20). Much of the corridor already includes - , E bike lanes consistent with ODOT's design standard. l However, segments in the north portion of the �'� �� ' ° rmr !) corridor lack bicycle lanes.The overpasses of the �> �"do?existing railroad near downtown Tigard and the Hwy 217 overpass also lack sufficient bike facilities. The width of the existing structure will not allow Phorograp rourkyof Bik'Portan.ors six foot bikes and maintain the required travel lane widths for vehicles.The most feasible remedy Example bike lane and raised median for this constrained condition would be to attach 1111111111.111.11111 ';; and cantilever additional structure to the existing , ,:- overpass to provide a directional bikeway on each „.1. side. gyp., "° 4 Bike safety on the corridor will also be enhanced through access management strategies in the ,, recommended plan.Access management reduces the potential for bike/vehicle turning conflicts. In addition to continuous bicycle lanes and reduction y in conflict points,other enhancements could , ` include: • Wayfinding signage to connect regional and local bicycle routes. 33 t")rt.gtm Transp oration and Gn.AVill\i:)nagcnient Ps(,.ra7r1 DKS Associates Figure 19 - Pedestrian provements \ 0' 75 ' 1500' /� .. N. S cP „r, FIf, yN G-p 4 se" N.* y 2 6,' Nl _ T 0 N� SW°I ' 04 SwP Mirst to 3 SK Itst '�+y�O., Ni t Sn vizos7 SW Bull MTIy RD N� SW BEEF BEND RD Z �O.°-`lofk I , LEGEND FIGURE 0 a ' DKS Associates Existing Gaps in Sidewalk i■omo Existing Sidewalk Railroad Overpass 4)—e New Pedestrian Crossing TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Upgrade to Standard Upgrade Sidewalk to Standard ■ 34 4 Figure 20 - Bike Lane I ►rovements \ 0' 750' 500' tuillP1 1 `i a Q m tPP SAP Fl sy�� y�� = y A 2Gl i . , 0Q9 swp Morsr Tti s*04,40, Cn l sr 41 84'41% 4, SR'BULL MTh/RD U, Ot SW BEEF BEND RD 91 LEGEND FIGURE 0 a 194k, DKS Associates 20 Existing Gaps in Bike Lanes Existing Bike Lanes to Standard Add Bike Facility on Railroad Overpass TRANSPORTATION S O L U T I O N S 35 Jr. ,ementation Projects Rebuilding the entire 99W Corridor in a a specific process when implementing Access single project would be extremely expensive Management Plans (OAR 734,Division 51).The and disruptive.Therefore,it is preferable that process involves an inventory of existing facilities, improvements be built as smaller projects phased development of access control measures,and public over time. Smaller,phased projects can compete involvement at both the individual property owner better for scarce transportation funding because level as well as the general public.The entire process they are less expensive;however,they still provide is aimed at providing a plan that is beneficial for the noticeable benefits to all highway users because corridor as well as the property owners along the they can be targeted to address the most crucial corridor. problems sooner,and less crucial problems later. Table 5 (page 37) summarizes the individual improvements along the corridor. Project ranking reflects potential benefits to various modes of travel.A specific improvement may benefit one or more travel modes. In addition,the ranking of the intersection improvement projects takes into account the overall intersection performance in the future.The worse the performance the higher priority for improvement.All intersections on this list fail to meet the operational standard at the 0 end of the 20-year planning horizon and should be monitored based on their performance. If a particular intersection's operational performance degrades faster than predicted in this project's traffic analysis,it could be reprioritized to reflect the greater urgency for a solution to be built sooner. It should be noted that the City of Tigard may have additional priorities,such as improvements to cross-town connectivity involving side streets. These considerations may influence the timing of implementation independent of the ranking in Table 5. As can be seen in Table 5,some projects occur generally along the corridor rather than in specific locations such as intersection improvements. Examples include access management,transit stop relocation, and construction of bicycle lanes and sidewalks. These types of projects can be implemented along the corridor in phases or as an integrated element in a larger improvement project. Access management is a significant element of the recommended alternative.To fully implement access management along the corridor a complete access management plan would need to be completed.The Oregon Department of Transportation follows TIGARI 99W 1Mvau E. MEN I & MANAGEMENT PI ANT 36 FINAL Rj:i'oin Implementation Projects Continued Table 5: Potential Project Ranking Based on Individual Location Needs and Benefit Rank Location Description/Improvement Potential Benefits Approximate Cost Estimate 1 99W/Gaarde/ Transit queue bypass,northbound and V V V V $1.5 Million McDonald southbound left turns,eastbound and westbound through lanes, eastbound and westbound left turns 7 99W/Dartmouth Transit queue bypass,southbound through V V V V $600,000 lane for 500 feet 8 99W/Walnut Street Transit queue bypass,westbound left turn V V V V $600,000 2 99W/I-5 Add northbound through lane for V V V $300,000 southbound capacity/access to I-5 5 99W/Durham Rd Northbound left turn V V V $250,000 6 99W/Beef Bend Rd Southbound right turn V V V $300,000 10 99W/72nd Avenue Southbound right turn pocket V V V $300,000 4 99W/Hall Blvd Eastbound through lane,westbound V V V $6.5 Million left turn 3 99W/Greenburg Eastbound/westbound left turns, V V $4.5 Million eastbound through lane 9 99W/Canterbury Westbound left turn V $250,000 11 99W/68th Ave Transit queue bypass V V V $400,000 12 99W/Watkins Install signalized pedestrian activated V $400,000 Avenue crossing 13 99W Corridor Perform an access management study V V $200,000 Access Management that specifically plans out the medians and driveway improvements for the corridor • 14 99W Center Median Install raised center median with low level $180 per low maintenance landscaping for access linear foot • management 15 Transit stop Upgrade and relocate existing transit stop V V $10,000 per relocation/ to be consistent with transit queue bypass site improvement implementation. Install shelters and other appropriate transit amenities at transit stops. 16 99W Corridor Infill Install sidewalks where they currently do V $65 per linear sidewalks not exist. Upgrade sidewalks to include 4 foot • foot landscape strip and 8 foot pedestrian zone. 17 99W Corridor Infill Install 6 foot bike lanes where they V $50 per linear bike lanes currently do not exist. foot SOURCE: DKS Associates 37 ()rcgon'1'ransportation and Growth Management Program DKS Associates +a. F U F:..=i c=; SOS.-.. : I S Appendix A Appendix A—Conceptual Alternatives and Evaluation • TIGARD 99W IMPROl'EM : & MANAGEMEN i 38 FINA1_ REPORT ((This page left intentionally blank)) • • • 39 ! (>rc. Tr;i .p,ttatiuf a:ui i irc»rth \'I..t,tgcn c t Pr(Ifram DKS Associates Appendix A TASK 41 CONCEPTS ■ DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the process for the development of concepts for the Tigard 99W Improvement Plan, as well as describe the concepts developed that will be evaluated and compared in a later task. Previous efforts for the Tigard 99W Improvement Plan project have documented existing data related to pedestrian, bicycle, transit and roadway operations and conditions. This inventory of data was utilized to help document a set of needs/opportunities/constraints that were then used to help develop concepts that address the deficiencies in the corridor. The next phase of this project focuses on developing concepts that support the purpose and goals of the project. A primary goal of this project is to develop concepts that enhance and encourage alternative modes of travel, while reducing the reliance of auto travel. For the purpose of the development of concepts, "themes" have been developed that focus treatments on a primary component to implement along the entire corridor. The corridor has four focus areas that allow for a more refined and detailed evaluation. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Three different concepts have been developed for this phase of the project and have individual themes focused on enhancing the connectivity and operations of the corridor in different ways. Inherent to all concepts is providing a balanced multimodal environment especially related to pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements. Therefore each concept will contain bicycle lanes, as well as sidewalks with landscape buffers all built to the ODOT standard. The following matrix summarizes these concepts. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 1 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 40 DKS Associates Appendix A 1 R ANSI'OR CATION SOLD I IONS Table 1: Concepts Descriptions Concept General Description Concept A This concept focuses on widening Hwy 99W to seven (7) cross-section from Interstate 5 to SW Greenburg Road. Access management is also a part of this concept, and is focused within the interchange access spacing area (1,320 feet) from Hwy 217 and Interstate 5. South of SW Greenburg Road local capacity improvements area implemented where intersections have future deficiencies. Concept B This concept focuses on implementing aggressive access management, not only within the access spacing areas of Hwy 217 and Interstate 5, but also targeting properties along Hwy 99W that have multiple access points, and those properties in close proximity (200 feet) of intersections with high collision rates and/or congested conditions. Another integral part to this concept is the potential implementation of local parallel connecting roadways to help reduce the reliance on Hwy 99W for travel within the study area. Concept C This concept is primarily focused on widening Hwy 99W the full length of the study corridor (from Interstate 5 to SW Durham Road). Access management would also be implemented along the corridor to help reduce the potential conflicts between motor vehicles and all modes of travel, as well as enhance the through capacity of the corridor. This concept is not as aggressive on access management as Concept B. SOURCE: DKS Associates It is not expected that any one concept is going to be the single solution for Hwy 99W, but by representing the concepts that have multiple elements (across multiple focus areas) it allows for a "mix and match" of elements that are the most appropriate to each specific area as well as the entire corridor. EVALUATION CRITERIA As part of this task, evaluation criteria were used to help develop the concepts. These evaluation criteria were developed to help balance enhancements to all modes of travel along the corridor. The following table summarizes criteria themes for used to help develop the concepts. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 2 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 41 DKS As ocia,„s Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Table 2: Evaluation Criteria for Developing Concepts Theme Criteria used for Concept Development General mobility • Provide for adequate traffic operations. • Provide for adequate storage of vehicles (queuing). Alternative modes • Provide for safe and convenient connections for pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes. Freight movement • Provide for connections and design considerations for freight to/from the corridor as well as along the corridor. Safety • Reduce or minimize the number of conflict points between modes of travel. Design standards • Meet access spacing standards at interchanges. • Meet access spacing standards between signals. • Meet roadway design standards for all modes of travel. Property impacts • Minimize impacts to properties and buildings. Cost • Minimize cost to implement project while providing a balanced multimodal corridor treatment. SOURCE: DKS Associates These criteria were used to help develop concepts for the corridor, and will be used again in later task(s) of this project for the evaluation of the concepts. ALTERNATIVE MODES As part of the development of concepts, alternative modes such as bicycles, pedestrians and transit all will be addressed equally for addressing deficiencies. That is to say that no matter what concept, the improvements to the bicycle, pedestrian and transit environments would be the same. The following summarizes the potential improvements being considered as part of the concepts development for the alternative modes. Bicycle Enhancements Each concept includes the enhancement of the bicycle environment by providing for a six (6) foot bike lane along the entire corridor. Much of the corridor includes bike lanes today that meet this criterion. There are however some areas in the north portion of the corridor that would require the addition of bicycle lanes, and overpasses of the existing railroad near downtown Tigard and the Hwy 217 overpass where the existing bicycle facilities do not meet this criteria. In addition to these bicycle lanes, other amenities such as signage and additional secure bicycle lockers could be implemented. Signage would allow for wayfinding for bicycle users to connect to other regional (and local) bicycle routes to/from Hwy 99W. Bicycle lockers could be implemented through redevelopment of properties along (or near) Hwy 99W and are only considered as part of concepts in that capacity. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 3 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 42 DKS AssociaLds Appendix A hAN SPOFTATION SOLUTIONS Pedestrian Enhancements Each concept includes the enhancement of the pedestrian environment by providing for a four (4) foot landscape buffer and an eight (8) foot sidewalk along the entire corridor. This assumes that even locations that have existing sidewalks would be upgraded to provide for this twelve (12) foot section. There are some areas that would only contain the eight (8) foot sidewalk. These areas are where the provision of a landscape buffer would be a cost burden to provide with little enhancement. The two areas where these occur are on the existing rail overpass, and the existing overpass of Hwy 217. Additional Pedestrian Crossings In addition to the provision of continuous sidewalks with a landscape buffer along the corridor, the provision of additional pedestrian crossings across Hwy 99W were also considered to allow for better connectivity. The Metro Regional Transportation Plan indicates that full street connections should be implemented no more than 530 feet apart. This is to help provide connectivity and accessibility within urban areas for all modes of travel. All signals along Hwy 99W (with the exception of one) are spaced further apart than 530 feet. Figure 1 summarizes the existing pedestrian crossing locations on Hwy 99W. Figure 1: Existing Crossings of Hwy 99W and Potential New Crossing Locations 1,400 1,250 1,300 800 1,000 1,630 720 430 1,000 1,000 2,680 6770700 630 1,020 I 1,040 650 1,270 1,330 umrted 141:4 Access Availabeey (12 a 55 cis 55 � z 55 65 65 � G3 J R1 1p d d (n r = N N ti . te co c a EL! S S co t]' m 0 - to OOOT Interchange Access Area X -No New Access -Potential New Access Based on the existing access spacing for crossings there are five locations that may be areas to potentially implement new pedestrian crossings. The speeds vary along Hwy 99W between 35 to 45 miles per hour, and the average daily traffic ranges from approximately 40,000 to 50,000 vehicles. Given that Hwy 99W is at a minimum 4 lanes wide, sometimes with a median, the most appropriate crossing treatment for pedestrians would be a marked signalized crossing for safety reasons. However, meeting signal warrants and spacing requirements limit (or preclude) where additional signalized intersections could be implemented. There are other means to get pedestrians across Hwy 99W beyond signalized crossings. These include such measures as marked unsignalized crossings, pedestrian Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 4 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 43 DKS ASSOCa...;S Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS median refuges, or a combination of the two. However, as previously mentioned, due to the speed, volume and nature of Hwy 99W any unsignalized crossing of Hwy 99W would need to have an engineering study and be well justified. The engineering study addresses multiple factors including safety, public involvement, pedestrian volumes/demand, collision history (3-5 most recent years), pedestrian desire lines for walking, sight distance, lighting and spacing to name a few. Other Pedestrian Enhancements In addition to upgraded sidewalks with landscape strips and the potential for new crossings, additional enhancements to the existing crossings could be implemented as well. These could consist of pedestrian countdown timers, pedestrian wayfinding signage, and enhanced striping for crossings (to name a few). Examples of these treatments are shown below. • �..• CENTURY - MALL T THEATRES { ENTRY .t+•t ' • ?WINCO OLD NAVY 4 V G.I JOE'S ersr. ' LL Pedestrian countdown Pedestrian wayfinding Enhanced crossing markings timer signage Transit Enhancements Each concept will also contain enhancements to the transit system that can be implemented as part of the existing transit network and does not related to implementing a new high capacity transit (HCT) system. The location of these types of treatments could vary between concepts, but are focused on providing a better transit environment and interaction with other modes of travel along the corridor. In addition, these enhancements should provide more reliable transit travel times and help to reduce delay to transit travel. The following summarizes the transit enhancements being considered for each concept. Stop Relocation All transit stops will be evaluated as to the potential to relocate to a "far side" stop placement at signalized intersections. A "far side" transit stop refers to a transit stop that is on the far side of the travel path through the intersection. The purpose of this is to allow transit vehicles to get through an intersection and stop on the opposing side to reduce potential delay at a signal for buses, as well as potential delay for motor vehicles that may be traveling behind a bus. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 5 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 44 DKS Associates Appendix A fit.;SPORTATION SOLUTIONS Queue Bypass Another enhancement to the transit environment consists of creating a transit queue bypass lane. This is a separate through lane at signalized intersections for transit that right turn vehicles can also utilize. Typically transit stops are then located on the opposite (far side) of the intersection. This separate through lane for transit can receive a green light to get through the intersection slightly before the general purpose through lanes so that if there are no patrons utilizing the stop on the far side of the intersection the bus is able to get a head start and jump the queue of vehicle that are waiting at the intersection and merge back into the general purpose lanes on the opposing side of the intersection unimpeded. Figure 2 shows the general configuration for a typical queue bypass lane. Figure 2: Intersection Configuration with and without Transit Queue Bypass WITH Transit Queue Bypass WITHOUT Transit Queue Bypass _/- IC= tIi 0 .- : .. .s r o 114 III Even with a far side transit stop, a bus without a queue bypass can block through vehicles because the bus is stopping in the vehicle travel lane. With the transit queue bypass the bus is allowed an area to pull out of the through travel path. However, a bus must then merge back into the general purpose travel lanes. The queue bypass must also allow for right turning motor vehicles to utilize it. This removes the conflict of right turning vehicles turning in front of the queue bypass if it were a transit only lane. An additional benefit of moving the right turning vehicles into the queue bypass lane is that they are now out of the through travel lanes allowing a less congested (reduced delay) environment for through vehicles. Queue bypass lanes can also be implemented, and typically have the biggest impact to reduce delay, at signalized intersection that do not have transit stops. Stop placement for transit service along Hwy 99W does not allow for this condition because stops have been placed at all signalized intersections. However the benefit of jumping the queue before the intersection still is beneficial to reducing delay and improving transit service reliability. The queue bypass lane must be designed with adequate length to be able to access it given the 95th percentile through vehicle queues at the intersection, otherwise buses and right turning vehicles can not access the lane. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 6 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 45 DKS AssocIa• LJs Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Transit Amenities Improving access to transit service and the reliability of that service is not the only enhancement to the transit environment. In addition to the previously listed enhancements, transit amenities can also be implemented. Typically these focus on improving the actual transit stops themselves, or the access to information related to transit. Criteria for installation of a shelter is determined by TriMet to be approximate 30 daily on/off patrons per stop. All concepts include enhancing the transit environment by providing shelters (where applicable) and adequate waiting space for patrons of transit. Connectivity Enhancements Each concept could also contain enhancements to roadway connectivity that could be implemented as part of any concept. "Roadway connectivity" means filling in gaps in the street system to give drivers alternative routes to 99W. Topography and man-made barriers (such as railroads and freeways) limit the potential for additional connectivity. The purpose of these types of connections is to alleviate congestion on Hwy 99W. One example of this is the identified project in the Tigard Transportation System Plan of connecting SW Walnut Street to SW Hunziker Street. CONCEPTS DESCRIPTION During the Needs, Opportunities and Constraints analysis, focus areas along the corridor were identified based on similar characteristics. These focus areas help to break up the corridor and focus treatments along the corridor in specific areas. The four (4) focus areas identified were: • 1-5 to Hwy 217 • Hwy 217 to Walnut Street • Walnut Street to Gaarde/McDonald Streets • Gaarde/McDonald Streets to Durham Road As previously identified, treatments are not specific or confined to one particular focus area, and may span between focus areas or along the entire corridor. The treatments are aimed at providing enhancements to all modes of travel and provide a balanced transportation system. The following describes the concepts developed for this task with supporting graphics that give a general overview of treatments/elements for each concept by the individual focus areas. Concept A: Partial Widening/Local Capacity Improvements The primary focus of this concept is to create a seven (7) lane cross-section of Hwy 99W (three through travel lanes in each direction with a center turn lane) from Interstate 5 to SW Greenburg Road. This is consistent with the improvement on Hwy 99W outlined in the Metro Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). In addition to the widening in the north portion of the corridor, localized intersection capacity improvements were implemented to allow for adequate intersection operations. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 7 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 46 DKS Associates Appendix A IHANSF'ORTATION SOLUTIONS Access management was also considered as part of this concept, but it was focused within the interchange access spacing area defined by the Oregon Department of Transportation which prohibits full intersection access (private or public street) within 1,320 feet from a signalized intersection of an on/off ramp. The access management technique employed in this area was to install a median in this area, which would modify all existing driveways (or public roadways) from full access to right-in/right-out access. Pedestrian and bicycle enhancements were implemented along the corridor by providing bicycle lanes at a minimum of five (5) feet on both sides of the corridor, and a four (4) foot landscape buffer that is curb tight to the roadway with an eight (8) foot sidewalk adjacent to the landscape buffer. Transit enhancements focused on relocating existing transit stops to minimize conflict for the pedestrian/bicycle environment as well as enhance connectivity to the transit network. In addition to these transit enhancements, queue bypass lanes were implemented at the more congested intersections to allow buses to travel in a dedicated lane (for transit) and bypass existing queues on Hwy 99W. Figure 3 summarizes the elements of Concept A and breaks the corridor into the four focus areas. Concept B: Access Management The primary focus of this concept is to maximize access management along the corridor. This was developed by using the similar access management found in Concept A (a median within 1,320 feet of the highway interchanges with Hwy 217 and I- 5). Additionally, the access driveways along the corridor were evaluated to determine which properties had multiple access points and where multiple access points to one property existed the driveways were highlighted for potential consolidation and/or closure to allow only one access point. Another access management technique employed was to identify driveways within two- hundred (200) feet of intersections that had been shown to have higher collision rates than other intersections on the corridor and/or near congested intersections. Driveways that met these criteria were then evaluated to determine if consolidation or closure could be accomplished to help minimize potential conflicts near congested intersections. If closure (or consolidation) was considered for a driveway in these areas, particular concern was taken to make sure that concept safe access was still available. This concept represents a highly aggressive access management option along the corridor. A full access management plan would need to be conducted to determine the full impacts of implementing a median, closing a driveway, and/or consolidating driveways to allow for shared access for properties. That type of exercise requires a much more in-depth analysis than is allowed for in this project, and would require a detailed public involvement plan to coordinate with all affected property owners. Those elements would be necessary if this type of an concept was pursued. Local capacity improvements at intersections would be implemented to allow for acceptable traffic operations at study area intersections. In addition to that, local Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 8 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 47 Concept A - Partial Widening Appendix A I,:I r) r 7trit WiliArillt,1„ 11.7W11111 r) r7 .'07tY-11:r1:. V 0:4 �. I �,ri/r �r0 111■I.1■r r °I OW-*1\ ‘' It-I",A 34°. . __ go ♦ tell %$J �� ,�♦ ♦ ♦ ♦, , 11 L_\,__,._-....-,, ,40 '..-----,- ilft a' • '4" • Ell . ' -'"-- -- if* IA .4.1111 Allii- . .41I )11"1 A r4 ;I* ' * 4114■SI(El' 11116' 'q 44i%1 ...11 ' r irii- -1%-* -1 ■ 11 A- i• IS, A.'%\ -' ,..> .,, _ 10 ow...... ,.,,,. . . iiiiiift ,40, 0 ...._-,,f-01.,,m 'wfi■i I•4 4..A P I rA1 t 40. -- /W \ ,, •'■ ti 0111161 alifiriumil -' •,, , vii 4 ♦ .ham- • ` 4∎1- a► ♦i�'∎� !t ' 9%7,1 ,V IIP .amr40.-. 1 IIIII 11 Os, '. A. 3 4 Pp al ill;114\,r1 I a ---- IIIIIIIIIIII .\., . - NP.0'lir.4 e4 1 I I 11 't \ IIIIII 4k' "li". , ik ;1;- ,NNNN., ir "11.• 'FrIelP' 111 111116-illiii '. Ai .\41.011160*481 ft■ . , ,A115;0 At • .. ' ta .11Pffil % AO - .-,7w--., ' • 'WA°- no-50:111101 ■As "*. -:, n6ARD ' .. rl % ;:00.3,--4,‹.i ■ --,---A "I • 1;'' t‘li 141 II r4' .. ■ -4 4'* "t ‘ \ ---I 't4. *4/1$.' • 4, 44. N -0 ',- " 0..--• s•-_•7.4.2vr4.4#: .1, 0/,' ,-. ,,, ,,. \-1V•*-A • 4- r'N. i , — 1--_—"'- . Ltik-tile 11„.... B te 11 .• se. er ,,,,,, ,,, n. ..y,, - . . -\,. y isiiii, .11_, 41,, ,.• ,. .., A 4 , 1: %' 1 ■•v f,, 4 to :I: .,,,,, 4•4 ,.,•'% \`‘,..,,' , . #■ 6.1g, . \sitt .t, wmt 00■#, „. ., ,.. y•• . lig 5:411,5 0 phi •�+ 1 ♦. ♦ i. ,P14 ■ ,--.011\ •AIrVollial le •:In% to ...t,Aril. li hol.i4b1' 1111bAhllik_ 0014\-ilist 1\1111111CW4.41 r Ail '• \ NA -%if. 1 1 L "...to. .- .__HIM UN 4 •z rat; ii .,4- ' Mir71 .11: _1711111111W 0.111_-------1.11.-. tiall11,Arlfra ..../.4 vali ........--.. . _____‘,-...,Is ittir ...7...:,.w.-......- \ UMW ... -Raised Median Access Management Area Orme -Nea:•elest•inn Cmssmc Learon FIGURE • -Study Area Intoned*"(acceptable epaiypry) • • • • .'ransit Queue Bypass Lo:aho° I I-Parcel with Impact to Building • . • •Interchange Access Management Area 0 -Potent:al Driveway Access Management 0 -Study Area Intersection(deficient operations) •► -Peoeslnan Widening Improvement ®-Parcel wrh Impact(ROW only) ■ -Seven Lane N.'iden^c Area ia -Potent..T•ansd Stop Relocation I DKS Associates Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS connectivity that would parallel Hwy 99W would be implemented (where feasible) to help lessen the reliance of Hwy 99W for local trips using the corridor. Similar to Concept A, pedestrian and bicycle enhancements would be implemented along the entire corridor, while transit enhancements would focus on stop relocation and queue bypass lanes. Figure 4 summarizes the elements of Concept A and breaks the corridor into the four focus areas. Concept C: Full Widening This concept is a uses elements from Concept A and B, and also continues the widening of Hwy 99W south of SW Greenburg Road the remainder of the study corridor to SW Durham Road. In addition to this widening, access management would be implemented consisting of medians and driveway closures and/or consolidations, but would not be as aggressive as found in Concept B. Similar to the prior concepts, pedestrian and bicycle enhancements would be implemented along the entire corridor, while transit enhancements would focus on stop relocation and queue bypass lanes. Figure 5 summarizes the elements of Concept A and breaks the corridor into the four focus areas. SUMMARY Three concepts have been developed to apply throughout the four focus areas. The three concepts all include enhancements to the pedestrian, bicycle and transit environments by providing: • Bicycle lanes along the entire corridor; • Landscape buffer and sidewalks along the entire corridor; • Transit enhancements either via stop relocation and/or queue bypasses; • Additional pedestrian crossings across Hwy 99W; and • Transit stop relocations. One concept focuses on partial widening to seven (7) lanes from Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road, with localized capacity improvements at intersections forecasted to be deficient. Another concept focuses on aggressive access management and localized intersection capacity improvements. The last concept focuses on widening to seven (7) lanes for the whole corridor. While there is no one "magic bullet" to address all deficiencies along the corridor, the diversity of the concepts developed help to explore many of the potential mix of options to better the transportation environment along the corridor. A selection of various techniques from all concepts may be the recommended treatment for the corridor. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 10 Task 4.1: Concepts Development April 30,2007 49 Concept B - Access Management Appendix A * r 7N. i f . * '', i,'- . * RP P714"Vall c PIPOTtiierW L'i ..1•Jitr w',A1 4117F---____.,.. ----i - --- -. ,,w--i--. ---A---- -10017ToHnoti It cl, _4. II,. *lye 217----a-0 reign'', 44/4*V*4 I.° .v.41111Malr •T 4 411/440 J, # 4.10111160 % 0•0 p• iii,, , 4 w4i t., 441- I, atv-7-ffamft *■%40111/1* PC V 4, 0 • #11ive,,,_,,rier;7____ 0 Frosiumrlivisten" ox-tli 4,44:11„ . ,..„ <N. 4 I: ictilf,, , ih,:::41aFtriz I ‘4...#1,. 0..4/ _AI : • 1 C ''6 SW # MI amp r.I limy/NV KO % /I/ r.■,--,- .wikt., % ez.1 CIIIIM7.!--ti -------,_filibti ,i10°•%31.1T. '0 % If* 1 f 111111111.1111 .\\ `0:110). 4.4 I L / ,* ��0 te � � *ii • ,� , � 4 r � ;�N 0,11114-1, -..1 ,.--41- \', _ 'A, • f As 4A 1 °/Ali 7 - .... 011 1 III ,, ♦,,,. ., ,:,. •, 1 I o� ht. ..■ _44 i. ,„.:AVIIJ., pool O' % 01-Y‘ir k;-fffalb, , ...0•430-**: -.1ii.1 Ilmitz gal 0. -44,"ra• r ess ,si/A-1 ."--,..* I 416, .„.44wAdo. dall),„„,_ .11300, lippor.:402 tom ■ . . 1." --2111,afisritagig *I1Jd ► it !: jiijfr IL LEGEND S■S -Raise_Median Access Management Area 410■1111 -'Je:v Pedestrian Crossing Location. FIGURE -• Study Area Intersection(acceptable operations i ♦ •• • •Transit Queue Bypass Location Iffl-Parcel with Impact to Building -•.v rie +■ -Intercnarge Access Management Area 0 -Potential lkveaay Access Management e -Study Area Intersection(deficient operations) •••■••■• -Pedestrian Widernng Improvement ®•Parcel w.m Impact(ROW only) --Seven Lane...■dening Area ti -PotentLal Transit Stop Relocaton 4 ■ Concept C - Full Widening Appendix A v Nipp:-e:71,/Fil • ate.\.. iyrip;/svptlIllIl Ap,s,:. oll illiMM fin P\T"tV r*VI/ /_Y 411 FIN rift-Wall 1 *00100. %.iii‘S I / Af X X-4. ■ 1/ 1/11■1„, MI Issa P I It*S 0?\.. 1 1 I Ilki ♦��1 ;:4,' *4W ' —� '��':�'�•' �1 'bra: 1�,, I �" .. g � 0' �� • 'hili • 4'. a Nir . p�^*%/7.; S.b ' A , ....i.„,....„00-== vi,.f. mmismay,.,, Pm? ' t--z044, 1701 1 to temP2 N-,,,„0 �*Art♦ i a 1■�� I �I * *.o.. \• ♦ •� . spa � l` ♦ S> , * � ♦;1� � � ' o�ii Will • �♦1 ■ • �♦4 �♦ ,� 11 O �� x / ,, ♦ , .,- �►�,,Iii $ • •,v„ . . 4it 1°---d&A MI III L -4.4■■-••... !-- — iam.- 1 1.-i'41.0.44bilti. -',.. /41\ --.---,-- ' ►ice � � y�lf ...„7-11,41 1 , .�j� � �1� �� ♦`� ,,�,�f� ��v low* _17: -•4\ • /1.1 41j, N .--ip -E.: i fs sa; 441=- 4 . .. ",/ *,\ vri-...4 °I4-71 ‘ffilk • 44 z. – vip ■ .4_,- %A. It.", ., *Ir fe 111 _ II- •� 44-. i !7-1 s' o ,••,'��:•41 /��,, :t ) :��I� Aitil---- letiiii LEGEND ■•. -Raised Median A..^.ess Manayemem Area Illi■i■Ill -New Pedestrian Grossing Location FIGURE Study Area Intersection(acceptable operations) •••• -T snit Queue Bypass Locaton IMI-Parcel with Impact to Building •. ,-e.- •Interthange Access Management Area 0 -Potential Driveway Access Management el -Study Area Intersection(deficient operations) ••■ 4 -Pedestrian Widening Improvement ®-Parcel with Impact(ROW only) —-Seven Lane Widening Area tl -Potential Transc Stop Relocation 5 Appendix A TASK K 5 ALTERNATIVES ■ EVALUATION & COMPARISON INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to evaluate and compare the previously outlined set of alternatives. This evaluation and comparison helps to determine an appropriate preferred alternative to take forward for final recommendation. Previous efforts for the Tigard 99W Improvement Plan project have documented existing conditions, needs/opportunities/constraints of the corridor, and developed alternatives to address deficiencies of the corridor. These alternatives were then evaluated using a set of criteria that contain both qualitative (non-numerical) and quantitative (calculated) measures of effectiveness. The recommended alternative will be the option that best supports the purpose and goals of the project which has a primary goal of enhancing and encouraging alternative modes of travel, while reducing the reliance of auto travel. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Three different alternatives were evaluated and compared for this phase of the project. Each was evaluated and compared by applying criteria developed previously to help develop the alternatives. While it is not expected that any one alternative will solve all the deficiencies in the future along Hwy 99W, the goal is to identify a solution that, on balance, best supports project objectives, including multi-modal travel needs, while minimizing negative impacts. The following is a brief summary of the findings within this memorandum for each of the criteria evaluated: • Pedestrian — All alternatives contain the same pedestrian improvement -- widened sidewalks, separated from the roadway with a landscape strip. Widening of Hwy 99W creates longer pedestrian crossings, requiring longer red lights at traffic signals to accommodate walkers, which can reduce the operational efficiency of signals for vehicle traffic, especially through traffic on 99W. Alternative B has a slight advantage over other alternatives by providing raised medians along a significant portion of the corridor, which allows for Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 1 52 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation May 24,2007 I DKS Associacds Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOt UTIONS potential pedestrian refuges for crossing at unsignalized intersections. This could make 99W less of a barrier for pedestrians. • Bicycle —All alternatives contain the same bicycle improvement of bike lanes along the entire corridor. But alternatives that add travel lanes to 99W could negatively impact the bicycling environment by making the highway more intimidating to cyclists crossing the road or making left turns. Similar to the pedestrian environment, a wider cross-section of Hwy 99W could be detrimental to bicycle travel along Hwy 99W for bicyclists that need to traverse from the bike lane across the corridor to make a left turn at intersections. • Transit— All alternatives include relocating transit stops to help minimize impacts with existing driveways for pedestrians and bicycles. Areas where the corridor are widened to a 7 lane cross-section do not allow for transit queue bypasses due to the additional width (right-of-way) necessary to implement them. Therefore areas where queue bypass lanes are not implemented would require transit to operate in the general purpose traffic lanes. This could create delay for transit service. Alternatives A and B both contain transit queue bypasses, however Alternative B has the opportunity to implement more than Alternative A. Alternative C has no transit queue bypass lanes. Alternative A would save approximately 1 1/2 minutes of delay to bus travel times, while Alternative B would save approximately 2 1/2 - 3 minutes of delay to bus travel times. In terms of right-of-way impact, Alternative C would have the equivalent right-of-way impact of adding a dedicated transit lane along the entire Hwy 99W corridor. • Motor Vehicle — Alternatives that add travel lanes provide additional vehicle capacity, which can improve intersection operations and reduce congestion. However, the additional capacity is almost fully consumed by traffic demand between Interstate 5 and Hwy 217, and then pumps additional vehicles south of Hwy 217. The widening for Alternative A, as recommended in the Regional Transportation Plan, stops at SW Greenburg Road, so additional vehicles added to the corridor south of that degrade intersection operations even further because the additional capacity is not available, and more localized improvements are necessary that include additional travel lanes in each direction in the SW Gaarde/McDonald area. Alternative C widens the corridor the entire length, but past the downtown area volumes taper off to a level where the additional capacity is more than what is typically needed for the 20 year planning horizon. The addition of the SW Walnut Street extension is beneficial under any alternative because it helps to decrease the volumes on Hwy 99W between SW Walnut Street and the Hwy 217 northbound ramp by providing an alternative access to the south for the Tigard Triangle area and downtown Tigard. • Safety —Additional access management through the use of medians and/or driveway closure/consolidation is beneficial to safety because conflict points are eliminated, reducing the potential for vehicle crashes. Alternative B has the highest reduction in potential conflict points by 70% along the entire corridor. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 2 53 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Assoc a.._ S Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Alternatives A and C focus access management within the interchange areas (1,320 feet) and have the potential to reduce collision points by up to 75% in the interchange areas. The raised medians used extensively in Alternative B reduce opportunities for left turns directly into driveways, but this alternative allows for U- turns at intersections, so that destinations across the road are still accessible. • Property Impacts and Costs — Based on the right-of-way necessary to implement each alternative there is a different level of impacts to properties associated with property only and widening that impacts buildings as well. Alternative B has the least amount of property and buildings impacts at approximately 953,000 square feet. Alternative A has the next highest impact to property and buildings at approximately 1.16 million, while Alternative C has the highest impact at approximately 1.58 million square feet. Consequently, Alternative C has the highest cost associated with implementation due to that larger right-of-way from widening, and the cost associated with the physical infrastructure of widening itself, while Alternative A has the second least cost and Alternative B has the least cost for implementation. Table 1 summarizes the right-of-way and costs associated with each alternative. Table 1: Comparison of Alternatives Right-of-way(ROM)/Building Impacts and Costs ROW Impact Building Impact Construction Cost Total Cost (sq.ft.) (sq. ft.) (millions) (millions) Alternative A 921,000 241,500 $27.27M $91.13M Alternative B 742,000 211,300 $23.18M $77.13M Alternative C 1,269,700 315,300 $32.14M $117.53M SOURCE: DKS Associates&Otak, Inc. EVALUATION CRITERIA As part of this task, evaluation criteria were used to help compare and evaluate the alternatives. These evaluation criteria were developed for all modes of travel in the 99W corridor. Some of these evaluation criteria are qualitative in nature, meaning there is no clear numerical way to measure their effectiveness, but they can be assessed based on their expected or perceived effect. Other criteria were quantitative in nature, meaning they could be measured using a numeric value to gauge the effectiveness of an alternative for comparison. The following table summarizes the criteria used, whether the criteria were qualitative or quantitative, and the typical measure of effectiveness for comparison. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 3 54 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Assoc aLds Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Table 1: Criteria for Evaluating and Comparing Alternatives Category Criteria Measure(s) Qualitative Quantitative Pedestrian • Connectivity • Adequate connections X • Crossing distance • Distance in feet X Bicycle • Connectivity • Adequate connections X Transit • Facilities • Enhanced environment X • Bypassing queues • Queue lengths X Motor Vehicle • Intersection • Level-of-service X operations • Volume-to-capacity X • Queuing/storage for • Queuing in feet X vehicles Safety • Driveways and • Frequency and number X conflict points of occurrences Property impacts • Land impacted • Square feet X • Building impacted Cost • Dollars • Estimated construction X cost • Average square-foot cost of impacted land and buildings SOURCE: DKS Associates While the quantitative measures of effectiveness will have a calculated (numeric) value, the qualitative measures will be assessed on a scale of 1 to 5 where a lower score represents less of an opportunity to meet the goal of the project and a higher number represents a high likelihood to meet the goal of the project. The following sections of this memorandum summarize the evaluation and comparison of each alternative using the previous identified categories and measures of effectiveness. Each alternative is evaluated individually within each category, and then a comparison of all alternatives is made at the end of each category. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT The following summarizes the evaluation by alternative, and comparison of alternatives for the pedestrian environment. Alternative A: Partial Widening This alternative includes the enhancement of the pedestrian environment by providing for a 4 foot landscape strip, and an 8 foot sidewalk along the entire corridor. This fills in the gaps along the corridor where sidewalks do not exist today, as well as enhancing the existing locations along the corridor where many of the sidewalks that exist today are sub-standard. The landscape strip buffers pedestrians from traffic, creating a safer, more inviting environment for walking. The widening from a 5 lane cross-section to a 7 lane cross section from Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road (approximately one-third of the study corridor) creates a wider cross- section for pedestrians to cross Hwy 99W. Under this alternative the new cross-section Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 4 55 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Associ ,_,s Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS is approximately 24 feet wider than currently exists. This additional width requires additional time for pedestrians to cross the roadway, which can affect signal timing by keeping vehicles stopped longer on 99W. This reduces the road's vehicle capacity. One additional signalized pedestrian activated crossing has been added in this alternative at approximately SW Watkins Avenue. This location was selected due to a long segment of roadway with no existing opportunities for safe pedestrian crossings. This crossing has been added to help improve the spacing of potential pedestrian crossings of Hwy 99W to better enhance connectivity within the study area. In addition, there are currently bus stops at this intersection that are served by an unsignalized pedestrian crossing. The new signalized pedestrian crossing will allow for a safer opportunity to cross Hwy 99W to access transit. Alternative B: Access Management This alternative is similar to Alternative A in that it contains a four (4) foot landscape strip and an eight foot sidewalk along the corridor, however the corridor is not widening at all and retains a five lane cross-section. This allows for shorter side street crossing times, which in turn has less impact to motor vehicle and transit traveling along the main corridor (Hwy 99W). The alternative also contains raised medians along most of the corridor north of SW Gaarde/SW McDonald Street. The raised medians allow for a pedestrian refuge at unsignalized locations to aid in additional crossings of Hwy 99W. Similar to Alternative A, an additional signalized/marked pedestrian crossing is located at the SW Watkins Street intersection. In addition to that crossing, one more signalized/marked crossing is proposed at SW 71st Avenue. The new signalized pedestrian crossing is located at an existing unsignalized transit intersection, so the new crossing will aid in safe crossing of Hwy 99W for transit access. Alternative C: Full Widening Similar to the previous alternatives, this alternative includes the enhancement of the pedestrian environment by providing for a four (4) foot landscape strip, and an eight (8) foot sidewalk along the entire corridor. The entire study corridor is proposed to be widened from a five lane cross-section to a seven lane cross-section. This creates longer crossing distances for pedestrians as well as requires longer crossing times for pedestrians. This additional crossing time can affect the main throughput for motor vehicle capacity and operations by taking time away from the main corridor. Similar to Alternative A, one additional signalized pedestrian activated crossing has been added in this alternative at approximately SW Watkins Avenue to aid with crossing Hwy 99W and service an unsignalized crossing with existing transit stops. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 5 56 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Associates Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Evaluation There is no quantitative (numeric) way to evaluate the pedestrian environment, however a qualitative (value based) assessment can be made. Each alternative has been evaluated for the pedestrian environment using various criteria. Table 2: Comparison of Alternatives for Pedestrian Environment Criteria Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Connectivity/Facilities 0 • 0 Additional Crossings _ 0 0 0 Crossing Distance 0 0 ❑ Overall Rating 0 0 0 Evaluation Scale ❑ El o 0 • Poor Medium Good Based on the qualitative assessment in Table 2, both Alternatives A and C have approximately the same affect on the corridor for the pedestrian environment. However, Alternative B has a slight advantage over the other two alternatives due to the fact that the crossing distances are less which can affect operations on the main corridor for motor vehicle and transit services. BICYCLE ENVIRONMENT There is not differentiation for the bicycle environment between alternatives. All alternatives include bicycle lanes (designed to standard) along the entire study corridor length. If anything, alternatives that provide for widening Hwy 99W may make crossings of Hwy 99W more intimidating to bicyclists, and add an additional lane to traverse when traveling along Hwy 99W if a cyclist wants to take a left turn. Evaluation Similar to the pedestrian environment, evaluation for the bicycle environment is based on a qualitiative (non-numeric value based) assessment. Each alternative has been evaluated qualitatively and is summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Comparison of Alternatives for Bicycle Environment Criteria Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Connectivity/Facilities • • • Left Turn Traversing 0 0 ❑ Crossing Distance 0 0 ❑ Overall Rating 0 0 0 Evaluation Scale ❑ El a 0 • Poor Medium Good Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 6 57 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Assoc a Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Based on the qualitative assessment in Table 3, the bicycle environment in Alternative A has both positive and negative attributes that end up balancing out from a qualitative assessment. Alternative B shows a slight improvement due to filling in any gaps in the existing network. Alternative C shows a lower than average environment due to the wider distance to cross Hwy 99W and traverse if left turns are to be made by bicyclists. TRANSIT ENVIRONMENT The following summarizes the evaluation by alternative, and comparison of alternatives for the transit environment. Alternative A: Partial Widening This alternative includes the enhancement of the transit environment by providing transit queue bypass lanes at two intersections (SW Gaarde/McDonald Street and SW Walnut Street), as well as relocating up to ten existing bus stops that currently are located where they require pedestrians and bicyclists to cross over existing driveways. The transit queue bypasses could save up to 1 1/2 minutes of delay to bus travel times. Including transit queue bypasses within the section of the corridor to be widened would not be advisable because it would create a nine lane cross-section at intersections. Alternative B: Access Management Similar to Alternative A, this alternative includes transit queue bypass lanes and transit stop relocations along the corridor. However, due to the fact that this alternative does not include widening to seven lanes, additional transit queue bypass locations were considered. The alternative includes transit queue bypasses at five locations; SW 68th Avenue, SW Dartmouth Street, SW Hall Boulevard, SW Walnut Street and SW Gaarde/McDonald Street(s). Implementing these queue bypasses could save approximately 2 1/2 to 3 minutes of travel time delay for buses. The provision of a median in this alternative allows for a pedestrian refuge that can be used for crossing Hwy 99W for access to transit stops at unsignlized intersections. The same transit stops were considered for relocation as in Alternative A. Alternative C: Full Widening Due to the full widening of the corridor to seven lanes, no transit queue bypass lanes were considered. However, the same transit stops were considered for relocation as in previous alternatives. It should be noted that the wider roadway also makes a longer crossing distance at unsignalized pedestrian crossings. Evaluation The transit environment is based on a qualitiative (non-numeric value based) assessment. Each alternative has been evaluated qualitatively and is summarized in Table 4. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 7 58 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Associates Appendix A IHANSl'Oti !ATION SOLUTIONS Table 4: Comparison of Alternatives for Transit Environment Criteria Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Transit Speed 0 • 0 Access to Transit Stops 0 0 Transit Stop Relocation 0 0 0 Overall Rating 0 0 0 Evaluation Scale ❑ o a a • Poor Medium Good Based on the qualitative assessment in Table 4, the transit environment in Alternative A and C have both positive and negative attributes that end up balancing out from a qualitative assessment. Alternative B shows a slight improvement due to allowing for pedestrian refuges to access transit at unsignalized intersections and the additional transit queue bypasses (beyond those implemented in Alternative A). MOTOR VEHICLE ENVIRONMENT The following summarizes the evaluation by alternative, and comparison of alternatives for the motor vehicle environment. As part of the evaluation and comparison of the alternatives, the 2025 No-build operations were also considered to serve as a baseline for operations to compare to. The 2025 No-build conditions represent the scenario where motor vehicle growth within the corridor occurs naturally through regional and local growth, but no improvements are built to accommodate it. No-build Conditions As part of the comparison, the future 2025 motor vehicle forecasts were developed and evaluated to determine which intersections would require mitigation to achieve adequate operations even if no alternative were implemented. This helps to determine a set of base improvements that would most likely be necessary. Approximately 11 of the 20 study area intersections exceed acceptable operations by 2025 during the PM peak hour. By 2025, demand along the corridor and side streets would require some type of optimized timing to allow for progression at a different level than is currently in place. As part of the potential mitigation strategy under a no-build scenario all intersections should be coordinated and optimized. In addition to signal optimization, the volume levels by 2025 (during the PM peak hour) would most likely be fairly consistent over the hour and would not have "peaks" that may exist today. In other words, the volumes expected in the future are consistently heavy along Hwy 99W and would create conditions where little variation in the "peak" volume would occur. This would in turn affect the "peak hour factor" (a factor that is applied to intersections to represent a surge in volume at a specific period over the peak hour) by increasing it to levels that could exceed 1.0 v/c. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 8 59 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Associates Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Even with the previously identified conditions, some intersections still do not achieve adequate intersection operations and would require additional mitigation to operate at acceptable jurisdictional levels. Mitigation was pursued where feasible to achieve a level-of-service of D or better, and a volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.95 or better. This mitigation was considered "right-sizing" the intersections to allow for proper operations. This was done for all alternatives where intersection operations did not meet jurisdictional standards. However, even "right-sizing" the intersections there were two intersections (Interstate 5 off-ramp and SW Gaarde/SW McDonald Street) that would require significant mitigation to achieve these standards. Therefore If mitigation could be identified to achieve LOS E and V/C ratio of 1.0 or less additional mitigation beyond those levels were not pursued. While this does not meet the ODOT standard of V/C ratio of 0.95, a design exception could be pursued to allow this level of operation. Figure 1 summarizes the 2025 PM peak hour intersection operations as well as potential mitigation. Alternative A: Partial Widening As previously mentioned, this alternative widens Hwy 99W from a five lane facility to a seven lane facility from Interstate 5 to SW Greenburg Road. The remaining portion of the study corridor remains at five lanes. The widening attracts additional volumes to the corridor within the widened area and further to the south. Generally speaking the additional lane of capacity attracts between 800 to 1,000 vehicles in each direction between Interstate 5 to Hwy 217, then the volumes taper off in each direction further to the south achieving approximately 400 to 500 vehicles in each direction near SW Gaarde/McDonald Street(s), and approximately 100 to 200 in each direction down near SW Durham Road. There is still some additional mitigation south of SW Greenburg Road that is necessary to achieve acceptable operations in the SW Gaarde/McDonald and SW Walnut Street areas by adding an additional through lane in each direction. This "right-sizing" to achieve acceptable operations creates a "mini-widening" south of the partial widening. Based on these inputs, Figure 2 shows the 2025 PM peak hour intersection operations and potential mitigation to achieve adequate intersection operations. Alternative B: Access Management There is no additional capacity via widening in this alternative so the same base geometry applies. The access management creates restricted access by limiting left turning opportunities at many unsignalized intersections and driveways. To better accommodate circulation along Hwy 99W in this alternative u-turns were allowed at signalized intersections where medians were placed on the approach to a signalized intersection. Volumes were then adjusted from the future forecast to take into account these additional turning movements. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 9 60 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 0 99W/I-5 NB ON-RAMP ©3SWESTHAVE.uET-iAVE ©99W/72NDAVE O99W/74TH AVE-Park BRide Study_, DKS Associates Tigard 99W Cor�jid�oer Ludy T G Tn>eSVCk Al OF tn,;Uy.l)a5 . ,. ,� NO SCALE 1�� '3' '�`' sir- '��' '11 P 1 1 z /. 'ilk \ 3 sal { `217 P: a T 4 a U .ee. - 2 ‘ S S47 o 99W/DARTMOUTH ST 0 99W/SR 217 NB ON-OFF RAMPS 0 99W/SR 217 SB ON-OFF RAMPS 0 99W/HALL BLVD HF -' 9 ar :,.....Dir..P I .. .4"J't:,i,,t:t, }er ✓ ff 4 r ,' .- I I 12 P:: T 13 O 99WIGREENBURG RD/MAIN ST CM 99W/JOHNSON ST// 99W/VALNUT ST ®99W/GARRETT ST �-m 14,, 'a a WM kDy 025 No-Build Unmitigated� 2025 No-Build Mitigated y y --✓. RD v., , r,.N r Intersection Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS VIC r fir fir k 4r Q Interstate 5/Hwy 99W >80 0 F 1.12 78.0 E 0.98 `c C wAh e"{ 0 SW 69th Avenue/Hwy 99W 35.8 0 1.00 22.5 C 0.89 e .• 17 S',fr Q SW 72nd Avenue/Hwy 99W 52.4 D 1.07 29 3 C 0.09 f�i l^ `D / �4,.4'j. 0 SW 74th Avenue/Hwy 99W 5.8 A 0 83 8.8 A 0.63 1 Nr O SW Dartmouth St/Hwy 99W 70.1 E 1:89 42.5 D 0.83 1....t, 19 O Hwy 217 NB/Hwy 99W 22 7 C 0.88 24 9 C 0.77 ®99W/PARK ST i e 99W/SHOPPING CTR DRIVEWAY ®MCDONARD DE T/ 099W/112TH AV/CANTERBURY LN / 0 Hwy 217 SS/Hwy 99W 19.2 B 0.89 19.5 B 0.89 t9 0 SW Hall Blvd/Hwy 99W >80.0 F 1.13 46.3 D 0.91 L Q SW Greenberg Road/Hwy 99W 74.1 E 1.11 36 3 D 0.95 �/1 SW Johnson St/Hwy 99W 24.2 C 0 8E 34.8 C 0.86 } X.2.14 "'d'I� '�� 2a m SW walnut st eeuHwy 99W 4,, D t o6 29 6 C 090'f DRIVEWAY .fir ® sw car a9 st ael Hwy sgW a s A o 77 3.3 A on 0 90 �' g�rr� r� Tigard Market Place/Hwy 99W 25.8 C 0 90 28.8 C 0.90 1 ® SW Gaarde/MCDonald St/Hwy 99W >BOA F '',t34 s. 63.1 E 098 Q SW Canterbury Lane/wy 99W 30.1 C 0:98 13.7 B 0 91 ('I 99W.SELL MOUNTA,N RD 0 99W/BEEF BEND RD a 99W/ROYALTY PKWY a 99W/OURHAM RD a> SW Bull Mountain Road/Hwy 99W 30.4 C 0.93 23.4 C 0.89 0 SW Beef Bend Road/Hwy 99W 60.8 E .1.06 . 15.9 B 0.86 ® SW Royalty Parkway/Hwy 99W 58.5 E 0.93 37 2 D 0.85 �1r1, v `‘ t ® SW Durham Road/wy 99W >80.0 F 1.13 43 7 0 0 92 -----j1 jj r. )1, LEGEND Sally Intersection 6 Number 'Does t IAeet�Jrude�icsonel FI Yf@ ®•Signalized Intersection Operational 2025 NO-BUILD -Ews gLaneCont9uanon INTERSECTION GEOMETRY a-MadrfieurNew Lane Configuration AND OPERATIONS O 99W/I-5 NB ON-RAMP ©99W/69TH AVE/68TH AVE 0 99W/72ND AVE O 99W/74TH AVE-Park&Rtde ' - DKS Associates Tigard 99W Corridor S dy r; ..: ., _ -.--r ppen I ;r f ftel r 4 fr `14 rr CK NO E 1 �j 1 't' • t 'qtr' '1tP ')r' 2 J: 5 J f 99W f�i '�' \_ 3 -' , 7 217 P AFFLE ST 4 ao ° 5 ,z g' ©99WIDARTMOUTH ST Q 99W/SR 217 NB ON-OFF RAMPS 0 99W/SR 217 SB ON-OFF RAMPS 0 99WIHALL BLVD CAAFy m\ 5 °n V AC 8 71 z 4, 9 Sr 1 C- �'.. .r ✓ph, �Q�y., s V sr 36 �1�. "" "�� IT �, `9jb qtr' N,,,,, 1D_ •a ,,, N,,,,,,..,s fJ!a 4� p 1� 11 �Fy ,� $o PA•a T 13126, YP Q 99W/GREENBURG RD/MAIN ST €99WIJOHNSON STl a)99W/WALNUT ST ®99W/GARRETT ST 14 ô4 d, a, 99W 11, 2025 Noeuild Unmitigated I Alternative Mitigated ti. ti S� G:'RDE RD , i.NL. T Intersection Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Gf✓ fir` ffj ~✓ s Q Interstate 51Hwy99W 78.0 E -.,,.0.86 ' 56.0 E 0.97 it �, ,y c-4, © SW691h Avenue/Hwy 99W 22.5 C 0.89 27.2 C 0.67 1 1 BD m 17 G 0 SW 72nd Avenue/Hwy 99W 293 C 0.89 36.4 D 0.93 .0 fP it { te ie.z ,i,, �y RD GAS Q SW 74th Avenue/Hwy 99W 8.8 A 0.83 7.4 A 0.70 ENO 18 © SW Dartmouth SVHwy 99W 42.5 D 0.83 46.5 D 0.85 g EFap / Q Hwy 217 NB/Hwy 99W 24.9 C 0 77 24.6 C 0.86 ' e 99W/PARK ST OD 99W/SHOPPING CTR DRIVEWAY ®99W/GAARD E ST/ CD 99W/112TH AV/CANTERBURY LN / 0 Hwy 217 SB/Hwy 99W 19.5 B 0.89 21,6 C 0.95 19.7--- Q SW Hall Blvd/Hwy 99W 46.3 D 0.91 49.3 D 0.95 t Q SW Greenburg Road/Hwy 99W 36.3 D 0.95 47.1 D 0 86 _ �1 e SW Johnson St/Hwy 99W 34.8 C 0.86 49.6 D ¢ -'>/ N��r X11 /r 1( t 20 >r -.. :� m SW Walnut StreeUHwy 99W 29.6 C 0.90 22.1 C 0.80 IVEWAY �� / ® e SW Garrett Street/Hwy 99W 3.3 A 0.77 22.0 C 0 '4 3 1, J. yr� 1 1121 ® SW Park St eeVHwy 99W 182 B 0.90 24.0 C 0 ee yyr, �- e Tigard Markel PlaceiHwy 99W 28.8 C 0.90 369 D 0.94 e SW Gaarde/McDonald St/Hwy 99W 63.1 E _.0.96_.A`l; 44.7 D 0.89 I e SW Canterbury Lane/Hwy 99W 13.7 B 0.91 20.6 C 0.94 e 99W/BULL MOUNTAIN RD a 99W/BEEF BEND RD a 99W/ROYALTY PKWY 99W/DURHAM RD m SW Bull Mountain Road/Hwy 99W 23.4 C 0.89 25.6 C 0.93 e SW Beef Bend Road/Hwy 99W 15.9 B 0.86 19.7 B 0.92 m SW Royalty ParkwaylHwy 99W 372 D 0.85 56.7 E 0.92 �� ^� `�f04 111`` rt SW Durham Road/Hwy 99W 43.7 D 0.92 44,8 D 0.94 1 s 1 ,I, yv J li .�J 3�r r ' LEGEND •Does Not Meet Junsdictlonal Figure 1 /+ ?� ir, Smdy Iniersecuon&Number Operational Standard ®Signalized Intersection 2025 ALTERNATIVE A 4-,Exlstlng Lane Configuration INTERSECTION GEOMETRY •Muddied/New Lane Configuration AND OPERATIONS I. DKS Associates Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Alternative C: Full Widening The full widening of Hwy 99W from a five lane facility to a seven lane facility attracts additional volumes in the north portion of the corridor similar to Alternative A, however the south portion of the corridor (south of SW Greenburg Road) has slightly higher volumes due to the additional capacity to the south. Generally speaking the additional lane of capacity attracts between 800 to 1,000 vehicles in each direction between Interstate 5 to Hwy 217, then the volumes taper off in each direction further to the south achieving approximately 500 to 600 vehicles in each direction near SW Gaarde/McDonald Street(s), and approximately 200 to 300 in each direction down near SW Durham Road. SW Walnut Street Extension to SW Hunziker Road As a sensitivity test, the regional travel demand model tested the effectiveness at relieving traffic from Hwy 99W by implementing the SW Walnut Street extension from Hwy 99W to SW Hunziker Road. This project is not in the financially constrained Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), however it is in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The addition of the SW Walnut Street extension is beneficial under any alternative because it helps to decrease the volumes on Hwy 99W between SW Walnut Street and the Hwy 217 northbound ramp by approximately 300-400 vehicles in each direction. The extension provides an alternative access to the south for the Tigard Triangle area and downtown Tigard. This is one of the more congested areas of Hwy 99W, so any project that would help relieve this area would be beneficial. However, due to the fact that the project is not in the 2004 RTP it was not included in this analysis. Evaluation The motor vehicle environment is based on a quantitative (numeric) assessment. The traffic operations and queuing are the two criteria used to evaluate and compare the alternatives. However, it should be noted that a qualitative assessment was also evaluated base on the level of effort for widening Hwy 99W because that could be considered "mitigation" due to the additional capacity added to the corridor. Detailed operations can be found in Figures 2 —4. Each alternative has been evaluated and is summarized in Table 5. Table 5: Comparison of Alternatives for Motor Vehicle Environment Criteria Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Traffic Operations Li 0 Overall Rating Li 0 O Evaluation Scale ❑ o o a • Poor Medium Good Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 12 63 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 O 99W/I-5 NB ON-RAMP I 0 99W169TH AVE168TH AVE ©99W/72ND AVE 0 99WI74TH AVE-Park&Ride 1 DKS Associates Tigard 99W Cor idor Study T. -AT:,,, I! ,,I, G; Appen tx A 1 .... kr r No scALE ii r K`* 4,tr� c"1 4,te P z / ,�.r„rr.a,men.et 99W y ma�.seeo 1�' X217 3 0 7 217• .-AF ..ST 4 0 ,- o ©99W/DARTMOUTH ST O 99W/SR 217 NB ON-OFF RAMPS 0 99W/SR 217 SB ON-OFF RAMPS 0 99W/HALL BLVD C,p,4 m11711pinqr °> g; PpY.G 7\l :',ZEE 8 s 9 \ S7 }:✓ "'cw �o ff lr �t P''«e0 DyNSGN t Sr �~ ~Y 4 l <A r' hti 1‘4,76,7 10_ A\N \\ Jr `��e„z Jr^ "I Jet i 57F� 12 % PARK ET 13 9 O 99WIGREENBURG RD/MAIN ST 99WOJOHNSON ST1 OD 99WANALNUT ST a 99W/GARRETT ST , 'I'', 14 MAPLEWOOD DR t4 p4,yFF s 99W qr 2025 No-Build M tigated Alternative B-t tigated V y +°� �\ do G••RDE RD 15 MCDONALD ST Intersection Delay LOS VEC Delay LOS V!C �e fir. �i(j �� P 0 interstate SMwy 99W 780 E :0I0d.1' 56.8 E 088,��-� � 0 SW 69th Avenue/Hwy 99W 22.5 C 0.89 20 2 C 0 87 Jr Jr � ��' 1 �� 'lp 0 SW 72nd Avenue/Hwy 99W 29.3 C 0.69 28.4 C 0.88 ,�. F�,:. p�,e Bu D t4,ReG 0 SW741hAvenue/H 99W 8.8 A 0-83 10.9 B 0.89 j,,.. �.,iO ?� Avenue/Hwy END 0 SW Dartmouth SI/Hwy 99W 42.5 D 0.83 44.3 D 0.86 gE F1yp is 0 Hwy 217 NB/Hwy 99W 24.9 C 0-77 27.6 C 0 86 99W/SHOPPING CTR DRIVEWAY 99WIGAARDE ST/ ®99W/PARK ST ® ® 99WI11TTH AV/CANTERBURY LN Q Hwy 217 SB/Hwy 99W 19,5 0 0.89 22.5 C 4:416-'-' MCDONALD ST 19 0 SW Hall Blvd/Hwy 99W 46.3 0 0.91 44.6 D 0.90 r n 0 SW Greenburg Road/Hwy 99W 36,3 D 0.95 35.9 0 't '� ey l / m SW Johnson S9Hwy 99W 34.8 C 0.86 28,4 C 0 86 s r >:e Y4 1 �� a t 20 :NI m SWWammstreeuHwy99W 29.6 C 0.90 46.4 0 r��t .1( )."..DRIVEWAY r �� ly CD SW Garrett Street/Hwy 99W 3.3 A 0.77 7.0 A 0 , F-N 0 SW Park Street/Hwy 99W 18.2 B 0.9D 14.9 B 0., a� 1 ~ Z (D Tigard Market Place/Hwy 99W 28.8 C 0.90 22.4 C 0.87 1 ® SW GaardemtcDonald St/Hwy 99W 631 E ,Q$0s• 67.3 E 49§'s (D SW Canterbury Lane/Hwy 99W 13.7 B 0.91 18.1 B 0.92 99W/BULL MOUNTAIN RD a)99W/BEEF BEND RD a 99WIROYALTY PKWY a 99WIDURHAM RD m SW Bull Mountain Road/Hwy 99W 23,4 C 0.89 24.5 C 0.91 SW Beef Bend RoadHwy 99W 15,9 B 0.86 16.4 B 0.87 I m SW Royalty Parkway/Hwy 99W 37 2 D 0.85 42 3 D 0.87 .✓ w/ ........ ........_...... ............_. .....__ .ED SW ._SW Durham Road/Hwy 99W__ 43,7 .__.. D _ 0.92 46.9 . D.._ 0.93.....__ 727 t�� 1 1 �t J * -t j• "' LEGEND Figure " CD•Study Intersection&Number �he ,,y -Does Not Meet Jurisdictional 9- /+ Operational Stantlard ®-SgnalizedlntesecGOn 2025 ALTERNATIVE B «--Existing Lane Configuration INTERSECTION GEOMETRY, tom-Mod/iemNew Lane Connguratien AND OPERATIONS I I O 99W11-5 NB ON-RAMP ©99W/69TH AVEI69TH AVE ©99W/72ND AVE O 99W/74TH AVE-0xk&Ride ± DKS Associates Tigard 99W Corridor Study ,T, is TP,zN PORTATi;. 5 i;uT-,u, ppen Ix t-,,, ti:•ite. rt � �('rj �` r K NO SCALE ,y��r 1tP f' 2 ,/1,, �'�7 !/1r a 17 .P T 4 c s a ©99W/DARTMOUTH ST O 99W/SR 217 NB ON-OFF RAMPS Q 99W/SR 217 SB ON-OFF RAMPS O 99W/HALL BLVD I F Vilir 1) < :, B, 7 �a :� g S Re Cl'f .f! `1r� 1/ 4 S y' Ai~ 44re "C ?� J. cal 1P r,o N ,,,\\ Isii.er 12 P R. 13 • O 99W/GREENBURG RD/MAIN ST at, 99W/JOHNSON ST/ m 99W/WALNUTST ®99W/GARRETT ST 14 J. MAPLEWOOD DR 7t u.,, 1 19w '4)- 2025 No-Build Unmitigated� Alternative A Mitigated t. kl i 0,:s6 RD -15 „�.- . I Intersection Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS VIC ✓ a � ✓� Q Interstate 6/Hwy 99W 78.0 E '''Q;;6'. 48.2 D 092 a ( �v a r( - 16 Q SW 6991 AvenueMwy 99W 22.5 C 0.89 23.6 C 0.89�� ,� � Qe Q SW7fidAvenuelttwy99W 29.3 C 0.89 31.fi 0.95 q • ;/,,,i Lq� Q SW 74th AvenueMwy 99W 8... A 0.83 7.8 0.83 N. Q SW Dartnoufh SVHwy 99W 42.5 0 0.83 44 2 D 0.92 ;,,c'p ,8 Q Hwy 217 NB/Hwy 99W 24.9 C 22.7 C 0.91 ®99W/PARK ST 99W/SHOPPING CTR DRIVEWAY ®999CWIGAARDE T/ O 99W/112TH AV/CANTERBURY LN / Q Hwy 217 SB/Hwy 99W 19.5 B 098779 31.9 C 0.95 ST 19 0 SW t1a8 Blvdhiwy 99W 46.3 D 0.91 32.7 C 0.91 c 0 SW Greenburg Road/Hwy 99W 36.3 D 0.95 3632.67 5 6 D 0,91 t �p f 1 Q SW Johnson S/Riwy 99W 34.6 C 0.86 21.4 C 0.82 �'� t j `1!c �',!j j '��• ^20 . ..:,,R. SW Walnut EEE 2RVEWAY SW Darren e ® SW Park 18.2 B 0.90 8.4 A 080 Tigard Market Place/Hwy 99W 26.8 C 0.90 16.7 B 0.77 ® SW Gaarde/McDonald St/Hwy 99W 63.1 E ?, 9E°=1 470 D 0.92 _ _ SW Canterbury Lane/Hwy 99W 13.7 B 0.91 13.5 B 0.80 0 99W/BULL MOUNTAIN RD 0 99WIBEEF BEND RD a 99W/ROYALTY PKWY 0 99W/DURHAM RD i m SW Bull Mountain Road/Hwy 99W 23.4 C 0.89 18.8 0 0.81 • I ED SW Beef Bend Road/Hwy 99W 15.9 B 0.86 17,6 B 0.86 �r m SW Royalty Parkway/Hwy 99W 372 D 0.85 32 8 C 0.80 , s�� ® SW Durtlam Road/Hwy 99W 43 7 D 092 51.1 D U r l LEGEND 7r1? l .DoesNOtMeeTJUnedkuonal Figure 4 �rrp.- SNdy InterSecoon 8 Number Operational Standaol ®-spnelaeatetenewon 2025 ALTERNATIVE C 4--Existing Lane conngwaeu„ INTERSECTION GEOMETRY a-Modified/New Lane Contgura0on AND OPERATIONS DKS AssociaL.;s Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Based on the assessment in Table 5, the motor vehicle environment has similar operations on an aggregate level due to the fact that the alternatives that widen Hwy 99W allow for additional capacity to help mitigate intersections, while the alternative that does not widen the roadway mitigates the problem areas. SAFETY Safety is an important component to evaluate because it encompasses all modes of travel. Two elements area specifically quantified through the evaluation and comparison of alternatives: number of conflict points at driveways, and number of driveways. Currently within the study area Hwy 99W has approximately ninety-eight driveways which the majority have full access (right and left turn access). A two-way driveway intersecting with a two-way roadway has approximately nine "conflict points" — locations where the travel paths of vehicles intersect, which therefore are potential locations for crashes. Closing the driveway would eliminate all motor vehicle conflict points as well as pedestrian and bicycle conflicts. Modifying the driveway to a right-in/right-out access reduces the potential conflict points from nine to two. Figure 5 illustrates these conflict points and the potential for their reduction. Figure 5: Conflict Points for Full Driveway Access vs. Right-in/right-out Access Ri.ht-in/Right-out Access CONFLICT DIAGRAM CONFLICT DIAGRAM Three leg Three leg intersection of intersection of a two-way a two-way street and an street and a unrestricted right-in/right- side street or out side street driveway or driveway CONFLICT POINTS CONFLICT POINTS O nte:-e,v — 3 O vr,n n X OAerc■r. — 3 X UlveriPr — t • C•ns.tr 1 • cut+,.n:, Iola! — lUlal 2 The potential reduction of conflict points helps to evaluate the safety of a corridor at a qualitative level to compare alternatives via access management. The following summarizes the evaluation by alternative, and comparison of alternatives with respect to these two elements. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 15 66 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Associates Appendix A 1RANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Alternative A: Partial Widening As a means to address safety within this alternative, access management has been considered within the interchange access management area for Interstate 5 and Hwy 217 (1,320 feet within the interchange area) and to close any driveways on parcels that front Hwy 99W that more than one access point. This is being done to help reduce conflict points for motor vehicles with other motor vehicles as well as pedestrians and bicycles. The closure of some driveways also helps to improve through capacity on the corridor by only allowing access at specific locations rather than at multiple locations that are too closely spaced (e.g. parcels with multiple access points). Currently the study corridor has approximately 98 existing driveways. Using closures as a criterion, approximately 20 driveways could be closed. This would result in a decrease of approximately 20% in the total number of driveways in the corridor. This would reduce potential motor vehicle-to-motor vehicle conflicts by approximately 180. Approximately seven of these driveway closures would occur within the interchange access spacing areas. This correlates to 63 conflict points eliminated in the access spacing areas. In addition to driveway closure, raised medians are proposed within the access spacing areas (for Interstate 5 and Hwy 217). This would change full access driveways to right- in/right-out driveways reducing the number of potential collision points from 72 to 16 in the Interstate 5 area, and from 81 to 18 in the Hwy 217 area. In total that is approximately a 75% decrease in potential collision points within the interchange areas. Alternative B: Access Management This alternative has the most aggressive access management in place by using all of the same techniques implored in Alternative A, but also implementing additional raised medians along other areas of the corridor, as well as closing some additional driveways to create a shared access between adjacent properties where feasible. Areas targeted areas for this treatment were those within 200 feet of signalized intersections, in an effort to optimize safety and efficiency at intersections. Alternatively, a driveway could be closed on Hwy 99W wherever a property has feasible alternative access via a side street, as long as the side street driveway was in a safe location and would not create another safety problem. It should be noted that any strategy that would involve closing driveways and/or relocating driveways would require a detailed access management plan that species the locations, impacts and actions for providing property access. That detailed access management plan was not part of this scope of work and would need to be taken on as a separate project beyond the work conducted in this effort. Using the additional aggressive access management could add up to fifty-one (51) additional driveways to the list of potential driveways converted from full access to right- in/right-out. This would reduce potential conflict points from approximately 459 to 102. This represents a 75% decrease in potential collision points between vehicles, and a 70% decrease in potential collision points at driveways along the entire study corridor. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 16 67 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Assoc aL„S Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Alternative C: Full Widening This alternative is less aggressive than Alternative B, but includes some additional access management beyond Alternative A through targeting intersections within the 200 foot influence area of signalized intersections. Driveways in this area were closed and/or consolidated where feasible to remove potential collision points near signalized intersections. Using these criteria Alternative C would close and/or relocate up to 29 driveways resulting in the removal of up to 261 potential collision locations. In addition to that, implementing medians in the interchange access management areas could result in converting up to 17 driveways from full access with 153 collision points to right-in/right- out with 34 collision points. This alternative would have an overall reduction of collision points along the corridor of approximately 57%. Evaluation Safety is based on a quantitative (numeric) assessment. Each alternative has been evaluated and compared and is summarized in Table 6. Table 6: Comparison of Alternatives for Safety Criteria Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Reduction of motor vehicle o • collision points Reduction of pedestrian/bicycle • a collision points Overall Rating o • o Evaluation Scale D I D E I D E Poor Medium Good Clearly Alternative B has the highest level of potential to affect the reduction of collision points along the study corridor. However, Alternatives A and C also help reduce the potential for collision points within the interchange areas which area highly congested areas on the corridor today. PROPERTY IMPACTS AND COST An extensive evaluation of impact to property and buildings associated with each alternative was conducted. The purpose of this assessment was to determine if the widening associated with either a roadway widening, or pedestrian improvement extended beyond the available right-of-way, and it would be necessary to purchase right-of-way to implement the alternative. In addition to assessing the property impacted, the potential impact to existing buildings was also evaluated. The widening of a project may not only impact right-of-way, but it may also affect a building and require that the building be taken as well. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 17 68 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Associates Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Using this criteria, analysis indicates that Alternative B has the least amount of property and buildings impacts at approximately 953,000 square feet. Alternative A has the next highest impact to property and buildings at approximately 1.16 million, while Alternative C has the highest impact at approximately 1.58 million square feet. Consequently, Alternative C has the highest cost associated with implementation due to that larger right-of-way from widening, and the cost associated with the physical infrastructure of widening itself, while Alternative A has the second least cost and Alternative B has the least cost for implementation. In addition, costs associated with construction only were developed for each alternative to help determine a total cost associated with each alternative. Table 7 summarizes the right-of-way and costs associated with each alternative. Table 7: Comparison of Alternatives Right-of-way/Property Impacts and Costs ROW Impact Building Impact Construction Cost Total Cost (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) (millions) (millions) Alternative A 921,000 241,500 $27.27M $91.13M Alternative B 742,000 211,300 $23.18M $77.13M Alternative C 1,269,700 315,300 $32.14M $117.53M SOURCE: DKS Associates& Otak, Inc. Evaluation Using the values calculated and the potential impact to properties and/or buildings, Table 8 summarizes the evaluation and comparison of each alternative. Table 6: Comparison of Alternatives for Safety Criteria Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Impact to properties o D ❑ Impact to buildings 0 Cost (not including ROW) 0 Overall Rating 0 D a Evaluation Scale ❑ El l] D • Poor Medium Good SUMMARY Using the prior criteria the overall ratings have been summarizes and compiled to be able to compare all aspects of each alternative against the other alternatives in an aggregated level. The following table summarizes all criteria elements used for evaluation and the ranking for each alternative. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 18 69 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 DKS Assoc &. s Appendix A TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Table 7: Comparison of Evaluation Criteria by Alternative Evaluation Criteria Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Pedestrian 0 D 0 Bicycle 0 D a Transit 0 D Motor Vehicle ❑ 0 D Safety D • D Property impacts and Cost D D ❑ Overall Rating 0 D o Evaluation Scale ❑ L1 0 fl • Poor Medium Good Based on the comparison in Table 7, it would appear that Alternative B would has the better overall affect on balancing modes of travel and allowing for connectivity. In fact in almost all criteria evaluation Alternative B scored the best. While Alternatives A and C do have improvements associated with all modes of travel to help enhance the operations of the corridor, the widening inherent in both of the alternatives creates adverse affects to the pedestrian environment, as well as difficulty to implement significant transit enhancements. In addition, the widening of Hwy 99W seems to favor the motor vehicle environment by adding through capacity along the corridor rather than more localized improvements at intersections. Under Alternative A, the additional lane of capacity in each direction is fully utilized in the future operations, and adds additional volumes in the southern portion of the corridor that is not widened and has some operational difficulties even today (specifically at the P&W railroad overpass and at SW Gaarde/McDonald Street). The widening for Alternative C adds a significant amount of capacity to the corridor, however the addition of volumes in the southern portion of the corridor does not need an additional through lane in each direction. The addition of the SW Walnut Street extension to SW Hunziker Road decreases the volume on Hwy 99W between SW Walnut Street and the Hwy 217 northbound ramp. The extension provides an alternative path to allow additional access to the Tigard Triangle area. This improves the operations of intersections within that area on Hwy 99W without having to add additional capacity in a constrained environment. While there is no one single measure to address all of the problems along Hwy 99W, this evaluation and comparison is aimed at providing both a qualitative and quantitative analysis for separate criteria components to determine how the individual components that make up the alternatives operate so that a preferred alternative could be constructed based on how the smaller pieces of the puzzle fit together. It may be determined that a mixture of different elements from each alternative may be the preferred alternative to take forward for recommendation. Tigard 99W Improvement Plan Page 19 70 Task 5.1: Alternatives Evaluation&Comparison May 24,2007 Appendix B Appendix B—Response to ODOT Technical Review Comments TrC:ARI)99W IMPuu1-I:A r & •A11%tir,)=ttr I I'I.tom; 71 Fix'r. Rkpoit Appendix B Conceptual Design Comments from ODOT 99W/71st Technical Review Comment: Can 71st be as a RIRO? Does the NB An ODOT reviewer provided comments and left turn lane (median) need to be there? Potentially, questions regarding elements of the recommended the SB traffic could get into this turn lane and try plan for Highway 99W improvements. Comments to get to businesses on the east side of the highway, and the responses from the consultant team are unless the proposed continuous sidewalk will take summarized below care of that. It is important to remember that this is a conceptual Response: It does not appear that making SW 71st plan. Implementation through specific projects a right-in/right-out(RIRO)would have adverse will require more detailed analysis and refinement, affects with the proposed mitigation in Alternative which usually happens in the process of preliminary B. However,details like this should be finalized engineering prior to a construction project. during the Access Management Plan that should be Elements proposed that affect ODOT facilities will part of implementing access management on the require review and approval by the State Traffic/ corridor. Roadway Engineer. Greenburg Road Intersection Improvements Comment: Is there currently a trap lane,SB 99W to WB Greenburg? Recommended intersection improvements included changes to the design of the intersection Response:Yes,current conceptual plans show a configuration and transit bypass queue lanes trap lane in the southbound direction on 99W at SW Greenburg Road. Additional southbound capacity 99W/.I-5/64th Intersection (through lane) is needed at SW Hall Boulevard Comment: Currently the NB right lane is a trap upstream,which leads to a southbound trap lane. lane to I-5 ramps. Can we create a 2-2-1 split from If this is undesirable it would be recommended in this existing 2 and eliminate the trap lane? further design efforts to modify the southbound Response: A 2-2-1 split can be created,and was (trap) right turn pocket at SW Greenburg to a done in Alternative 1 and 2. This concept could be through lane that merges south of Hwy 99W. incorporated into Alternative B and is not fatally Johnson Street Hawed. This detail could be designed in further Comment:The right turn taper rate seems short? preliminary engineering efforts. Is it because of the bridge end? 99W/69th Intersection Response: Currently SW Johnson Street has a Comment:WB 69th to NB 99W right turn radius southbound right turn pocket for approximately 100 can be tightened up so it won't appear a free right. feet.The current conceptual proposed alternative The current layout may cause some confusion retains this turn pocket. because of the NB thru/right lane from the southerly approach and the appearance of a free Johnson Street- Park Street right turn from the easterly approach. Tightening Comment: Can un-signalized intersections be up the radius may also help the pedestrian crossing RIRO? What happens it a raised median proposed distance. in this section? Response: This design level detail can be Response: It seems that unsignalized intersections incorporated when the project is forwarded on could be converted to right-in/right-out(RIRO). to the preliminary engineering level of detail for However,details like this should be finalized during design. the Access 72 € Oregon Transportanon and Growth Management Program DKS Associates Appendix B Walnut Street curves. This is a detail that should be finalized in Comment: SB 99W to WB Walnut taper does not preliminary engineering appear to be very clear. Where's the bike lane at this Comment: Was a shy distance next to raised intersection? medians included in these conceptual plan Response:To help accommodate queuing as well illustrations? as the transit queue bypass lane at SW Walnut Street, Response: Every effort was made to incorporate the right turn pocket/transit queue bypass lane standard design details at this conceptual planning was extended all the way back to SW Mackenzie stage. A two foot shy distance was incorporated Street. The transition occurs at the intersection of into this conceptual phase. SW Mackenzie Street. This layout could change to accommodate the transition after the SW Mackenzie Comment: Is access management part of this Street intersection in further preliminary design effort? If not,is there a proposed access to efforts. the funeral home near the Hwy 217/Hwy 99W interchange ramp terminal? The current access Queuing Bypass Lanes location should be addressed in some way. Comment: Generally,between the thru movement, Response:Access management is part of the left turn movement and right turn movement, proposed alternative,and full details of all access whichever one longer in the queue will dictate where points that would be affected would be finalized the turn taper begins. Unless it becomes excessive during the Access Management Plan that should be or impractical in length for these turn lanes. (Please part of implementing access management on the o a' call Canh for clarification). corridor. Response: Queuing was taking into account for Comment: Is there an Access Management Plan as this preliminary conceptual layout. Similar to the separate part of this project? comment,the longest queue was accommodated where it was practical. Response:This project did not develop an access management plan. Each alternative that was Medians and Access Management evaluated had an access management concept.The Comment: An access management concept recommended plan describes an access management applied throughout the corridor is part of the concept. Implementation of the access management recommended plan.The primary implementation would require an access management plan pursuant tools for this concept would be: with OAR 734,Division 5. • Raised medians • Driveway closures, consolidation or relocation. Raised medians are recommended along most of the corridor north of SW Gaarde/SW McDonald Street,placing medians along approximately 40% of the corridor's length. Comment: Some median deceleration distance/ curb reversing curves appear to be short. Please check the decel distance). Response: Every effort was made at the conceptual planning stage to incorporate ODOT standards for acceleration,deceleration, turn pockets and reverse TIGARD 991V IMPRo I Mrrti r&MANAGF.Mr=.Nr PLAN 73 FINAL RF 'on1 ((This page left intentionally blank)) .• :•• .• :•• .• .• .• .• .• .• .•• .•• :•• .• 74 Fransportalion and( 11 u 1 agcment Program Ems Associates Appendix C Appendix C—Tigard Transportation System Plan Updates r TIGARD 991X'IMPROVEMENT& MANAGEMENT PLAN i 75 FINAL. REPORT Appendix Tigard Transportation System Plan Updates Limits". Update cost from $500,000 to $800,000. To implement the recommended plan for Highway Page 1-17: Bicycle Master Plan 99W and the surrounding area, amendments should Update the description of bicycle lanes south of be made to the City of Tigard Transportation Gaarde/McDonald to Durham Road to note that System Plan (TSP) to include modal improvements. these facilities are existing, not planned. Many of the amendments/updates are related to Page 1-18: Bicycle Action Plan Improvement List the general finding that Hwy 99W would remain as and Cost a five lane cross-section within the study area and would not be widened to a seven lane cross-section Update ORE 99W bike lane improvement cost from (as per the current TSP and Regional Transportation $1,300,000 to $275,000 Plan). The City of Tigarcl should update their TSP Page 1-25: Future Streets Where ROW is Planned to reflect the recommended Hwy 99W plan.The for More Than Two Lanes Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is also being Update figure to change I-Ivy 99W from 7 lane (red updated, therefore there is a potential to coordinate line) between Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road to 4/5 the City's TSP updates with the RTP updates.. lane (dark blue). A key element to the Tigarcl 99W Improvement and Page 1-30: Street inaprovement: plan (Figure) Management Plan is the implementation of access management along Hwy 99W'. While the current Update figure to remove 7 lane improvement along Hwy 99W from Interstate 5 to SW Greenburg Road. TSP does reference access management on Hwy 99W, the TSP does not call out access management Page 1-31: Intersection Improvement Locations in the area between Interstate 5 and SW Greenburg Update Figure 8-20 to include intersection Road clue to the potential to widen to seven lanes improvements at: in each direction. The update to the TSP should take into account providing for access management ORE 99W/SW Durham Road along Hwy 99W from Interstate 5 to SW Durham • ORE 99W/SW Canterbury Lane Road through an access management plan. Local intersection improvements along Hwy 99W should Chapter 2: Goals and Policy implement access management by utilizing the No updates necessary. The Refinement Plan is guiding access management principles outlined focused on future conditions. Any changes to previously. existing conditions should be clone via a full update The following text includes each potential to the TSP. modification/amendment to the current City Chapter 3: Existing Conditions of Tigarcl TSP for each chapter. Many of the No updates necessary. The Refinement Plan is recommended modifications consist of specific focused on future conditions. Any changes to text changes noted in underline/overstrike; other existing conditions should be done via a full update recommendations provide general guidance so the to the TSP. City can make the necessary changes to text and illustrations in the TSP. All of these suggested Chapter 4: Future Demand and Land Use modifications support the findings in the Tigarcl No updates necessary. 99W Implementation and Management Plan. Chapter 5: Pedestrians Chapter 1: Summary Page 5-9: Table 5--2 Potential Pedestrian Projects Page 1-15: Pedestrian Action Plan List—Update Update ORE 99W project from "McDonald Street ORE 99W sidewalk project from `McDonald to to South City Limits" to "Interstate 5 to South City South City Limits" to "Interstate 5 to South City Limits". 76 tlrc t Tvarisp,,rt:i i ,❑a 11 Cn Nlanagcn mu I'r:,,rat i DKS Associates Appendix Page 5-11: Table 5-2 Potential Pedestrian Projects Chapter 8: Motor Vehicles Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing at SW Page 8-21: Figure 8-11 Future Streets Where 71st Avenue to project list with "Medium" ranking. ROW is Planned for More Than Two Lanes Page 5-11.: Table 5-2 Potential Pedestrian Projects Updated figure to change Hwy 99W from 7 lane (red line) between Interstate 5 to Greenburg Road Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing at to 5 lane (yellow line). SW Watkins Avenue to project list with "Medium" ranking. Page 8-34 and 8-35: Last Paragraph Chapter 6: Bicycles Update text to "...The TSP recommends: 1)widening ORE 99W to Jeven lanes between I-5 rani-GreenbargRuud; Page 6-8: Figure 6-1 Bicycle Plan Alternative 2)rUlu/rurrg the fire lune crajs jectiun on ruudwuy soot/;hest Update figure to include existing bike lanes just of Greersbur Road, 3)extensive intersection improvements north of SW Greenburg Road. —turning lanes;42)aggressive access management, Page 6-9: Figure 6-2 Bicycle Master Plan including the development of an access management plan (Framework Option) for the corridor;51,1improvements to ORE 217 and 1-5 noted above;{4 off-system improvements such as freeway Update planned bicycle lanes south of Gaarde/ improvements and arterials such as Walnut extension;and McDonald to Durham Road to note that they are -7 consideration of a western!Yamhill County commuter existing. rail corridor" Chapter 7: Transit Page 8-37: Last Paragraph, first bullet O 1! Page 7-1: Paragraph 4, Lute 3 Update text to "ORE 99W sev a laws access Update text to "...park and ride at ORE 99W/72rnl management" Adertne 74th Avenue)." Page 8-38: Table, third item Page 7-9: Table 7-2 Potential Transit.Projects Update text to `7..ere1 of 3e7 dice.I'uwadiliurr, 7will iii • Update table with following potential transit Tigard T;angle without 7 lane.,. This option would limit the project(s). (Updated Table Below) potential of the Tigard Triangle to serve the projected land use in the future without localised intersection improvements. These improvements could include additional approach lanes northbound and southbound on ORE 99W for short periods. The u'r,e,io srglrureu utter datives lhul p,abided the need fur Table 7-2:Potential Transit Projects Rank I Project I Description 7 Enhance transit Implement transit queue bypass lanes along ORE 99W at the following locations: reliability along • SW Gaarde/SW McDonald Street regional facilities • SW Walnut Street • SW Hall Boulevard (northbound) • SW Dartmouth Avenue (northbound) • SW 68th Avenue Work with TriMet to relocate transit stops along ORE 99W (where appropriate) to allow for far side stop operations at signalized intersections to reduce potential delay to transit operations. TIGARD 99W imil:ovr 37P. l & MAN'r'1.(F-ENT PAN ` 77 FiN:\l Rl<ns)R'I Appendix C 7 luelcs llelrvicea 1-5 u41e1217." Page 8-42: Table 8-6 Project Number. 21 Add asterisk to project description that identifies that based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan,both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7 lanes. Page 8-45: Table 8-7 Third Project Listed Add asterisk to project description that identifies that based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan,both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7 lanes. Page 8-47: Figure 8-19 20 Year Street Improvement Plan Update figure to remove seven lane widening project from Hwy 99W Page 8-48: Figure 8-20 Intersection Improvement Locations Update figure to include projects at the following intersections: • #37—ORE 99W/SW Durham Road • #38—ORE 99W/SW Canterbury Lane Page 8-49 through 8-51: Table 8-8 City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements Update table to include specific projects and add projects at the following intersections: 78 I Oregon Transportation and Growth Management Program DKS Associates Appendix C Table 8-8 City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements No. I Intersection I Description 8 Main/Greenburg/ORE 99W • Southbound left tutu larre • • • - • .. .. , • Add eastbound left turn pocket • Add westbound left turn pocket 11 Ball/ORE 99W • •• ... • Westbound left tutu lane W • Ligllt tun)o1ellnp•• _. .. .. - •• .. .• Westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction +2 i •• • i • ., i •• • ••• . .. •• • • - • • Retain westbound tight turn lake wheti ORE 99W wiekned to 7 lanes • 2nd uluLtbliound left turn lane +3 : • NI • : •• • 2nd southbound tight tutu lanc 99W • • [- ••. ■ • ,. = . .. •' • '. • • . 14 Dartmouth/ORE 99W • Retain eastbound tight tarn lane when ORE 99W widened to 7 lanes o a'■ • Ad. southbound through lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction 15 72nd/ORE 99W • Southbound right turn lane • Northbound right turn overlap • Change to protected left turn phasing north/south • Retain eastbound tight tuin lane when ORE 99W wid.-nt.d to 7 lanes 16 68th/ORE 99W • 2nd westbound left tuna • Northbound left turn lane • Southbound i..ft turn lank. • Change to plute..ted left Lulu pl,ning,nu'tli/suutll • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 25 ORE 99W/McDonald/ • Westbound right turn lane Gaarde • Retain eastbound right turn lane • 2nd Northbound left turn lane • 2nd Southbound left turn lane • Eastbound through lane • Westbound through lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 30 Walnut/ORE 99W • Retain westbound light tutu lane when ORE 99W is widened to 7 laueb • Change to protected left turn phasing on Walnut • ,ldd westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 37 ORE 99W/Canterbury Lane • Add westbound left turn lane • • • 3$ ORE 99W/Durham Road • Add northbound left turn lane TJ& Rn 99W IMPROVEMENT&MANAGEMENT PLAN 74 FINAL,REPORT Appendix C (Updated Table on page 28) Chapter 9: Other Modes No updates necessary. Chapter 10: Transportation Demand Management No updates necessary. Chapter 11: Funding/Implementation Page 11-7: Table 11-4 Pedestrian Action Plan Project List Update ORE 99W project from "McDonald Street to South City Limits" to "Interstate 5 to South City Limits". Update cost from$500,000 to$800,000. Page 11-7: Table 11-4 Pedestrian Action Plan Project List Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing at SW 71st Avenue to project list with "Medium"ranking and cost of $200,000. Page 11-7: Table 11-4 Pedestrian Action Plan Project List Add pedestrian activated signalized crossing at SW Watkins Avenue to project list with"Medium" ranking and cost of $200,000. Page 11-8: Table 11-5 Bicycle Action Plan Improvement List and Cost Update ORE 99W bike lane improvement cost from $1,300,000 to$275,000. Page 11-9: Table 1 1-6 Future Street Improvements Add asterisk to project description that identifies that based on the recommendations of the Tigard 99W Improvements Plan,both the TSP and RTP should be amended to retain four/five-lanes rather than the current designation to widen ORE 99W to 7 lanes. Page 11-11: Table 11-7 City of Tigard Future Intersection Improvements Update table to include specific projects and add projects at the following intersections: (Table on page 30) 80 Oregon'Transportation and Growth;Managcrncnt PrOg till" DKS Associates soil:ir;nc Appendix C 7-able 11-7 City of Tigard Future 1 nterrection improvements No. I Intersection Description I Cost 8 Main/ • Southbound left Will lam. $300;000 Greenburg/ORI'' • Rei.ai,I-westbound tight turn hint when ORE 99W widened to 7 lama S500,000 99W g • Add eastbound left turn pocket • Add westbound left turn pocket I I I tall/ORE 99W • Soutl,buutd light two Ian,. 53-,700,000 • NottLLound kit tutu]alit. 5750 000 • WWstLutind tight tut,uvcdap • Retain westbound tight turn lane when ORE 99W widt.ncd to 7 lanes • Westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction +2 ORE 217 NH • Rctain eastbound tight tufts lane when ORE 99W widcnt..d to 7 lanes $900;000• [R]palmrps/OR1..- • • , , • y • 2nd northbound left turn lane +3 ORE 217 SB • 2nd southbound tight turn lane $400,000 Ramps/ORE •• • •nt. w ht.n ORE 99W wide,ne tuzo-7-hunts• 14 Dartmouth/ • Retain eastbound tight tuin lane when ORE 99W widened to 7 lanes $20E000 ORE 99W • Add southbound through lane $600,000 0 ar; • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound direction 15 72nd/ORE 99W • Southbound right turn lane $506;000 • Northbound right turn overlap 5300,000 • Change to protected left turn phasing north/south • • s 16 68th/ORE 9t1\\ • • 2nd westbound kit two lane $1,550,000 S400,000 • Not tlLvuilt ift tut n a,n • Southbound kit tutu Lot. • Chang;. to ptotct.lcd kit tutu,pltasiog nuttlt/suutlr • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound direction 25 ORE 99W/ • Westbound right turn lane 530E,000 McDonald/ S1,500,000 Retain eastbound right turn lane Gaarde • 2nd Northbound left turn lane • 2nd Southbound left turn lane • Eastbound through lane • Westbound through lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions 30 Walnut/ORE • Retail westbound light tut„late when ORE 99W is widt.nt.d to 7 lanes X000 99VG • Change to protected left turn phasing on Walnut 5600,000 • Add westbound left turn lane • Add transit queue bypass lanes in northbound and southbound directions ORE 99W/ • _1dd westbound left turn lane S250,000 Canterbury Lan( 38 ORE 99W/ • Add northbound left turn lane S250,000 Durham Road `llt.:um 991\ \11'11 0), & a•,v id-MI•.N 1 1t1.1N 81 h i NAI. ttt=r0111