DDR2014-00003 DDR2O14 - 00003
CITY HALL
RESTORATION
NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION
DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (DDR) 2014-00003
1,1
. .
CITY HALL RESTORATION TIGARD
120 DAYS = 9-4-14
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: CITY HALL RESTORATION
CASE NO.: Downtown Design Review(DDR) Compliance Letter DDR2014-00003
PROPOSAL: The proposal is for exterior facade repair and improvements, and landscaping
modifications, including the removal and replacement of 26 trees, to the existing
building currently occupied by the police department, city hall and the permit
center. The landscaping improvements will not reduce or increase the landscaping
area.
APPLICANT: City of Tigard
Kim McMillan
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
OWNER: Same as applicant
LOCATION: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,WCTM 2S102DA,Tax Lot 00401
ZONING
DESIGNATION: MU-CBD: Mixed Use — Central Business District. The MU-CBD zoning
district is designed to provide a pedestrian friendly urban village in Downtown
Tigard. A wide variety of commercial, civic, employment, mixed-use, multi-
family and attached single family residences are permitted. New development
and re-development is required to conform to the standards of Chapter 18.610.
SUB-AREA: Fanno -Burnham Street. This sub-area provides an opportunity for medium
scale residential or mixed use development. Compatible mixed uses (live-work,
convenience retail,office and civic uses) are encouraged on the frontage of
Burnham Street. The area in proximity to Fanno Creek Park will be an
opportunity to create a high quality residential environment with views and
access to the natural amenity of Fanno Creek Park. Building heights will step
down to three stories so as not to overwhelm or cast shadows on the park.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.610.030
SECTION II. DECISION
DDR2014-00003 CITY I IAI d.RESTORATION PAGE 1 OF 4
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS the above request for Downtown Design Review. The findings
and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV.
1. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall submit a landscape plan showing the species
of trees to be planted as replacement trees.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. SITE AND PROPOSAL INFORMATION
Site Information& History
The site is located on SW Hall Boulevard, and is developed with a building and associated landscaping and
parking. The site and surrounding properties were rezoned from CBD (Central Business District) to MU-
CBD (Mixed Use —Central Business District) in 2010 to create the Tigard Downtown District. Sub-areas
were established within the downtown,and this site is located within the Fanno- Burnham Street sub-area.
Proposal Information
The applicant's proposal includes the following:
1. Removal and replacement of the Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS).
2. Facade improvements include modifications to the entryway canopy between City Hall and the
Permit Center and a new window on the south side of the Permit Center building.
3. Demolition of existing landscaping and replanting of new landscaping. There will not be a
change in square footage of landscaping.
4. Removal of 26 trees along the perimeter of the building and within the parking area. The
replacement trees are on the city's approved tree lists.
Because the proposal meets the threshold of a Track 1 Design Review Compliance Letter (Tigard
Development Code Section 18.610.010.E.1), the application is being processed through a Type I
procedure.
SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Tigard Downtown District Development and Design Standards (18.610)
18.610 TIGARD DOWNTOWN PLAN DISTRICT
18.610.030 Building and Site Design Standards
A. Create Vibrant ground floors, streetscapes and rights-of-way; provide weather protection;
and promote safety and security. Design standards in this section are intended to foster
vibrant, inviting streetscapes and sidewalk-facing ground floors and entryways. They are also
intended to create buildings that are easily accessible and provide protection from the elements
1)1)1131114-W03 CITY 1 LV.1.RlSTORA77ON 1':1GP.2 01,4 4
for pedestrians. They also will help ensure that the ground floor promotes a sense of interaction
between activities in the building and activities in the public realm.
5. Weather Protection. For non-residential and mixed use buildings:
a. A projecting façade element (awning, canopy, arcade, or marquee) is required on
the street-facing facade of the street with the highest functional classification.
b. Awnings/marquees/canopies may project a minimum of three feet and a
maximum of six feet from the facade (a maximum of four feet into the public right-
of-way).
c. The element shall have a minimum 10-foot clearance from the bottom of the
element to the sidewalk.
d. Awnings must match the width of storefronts or window openings.
e. Internally lit awnings are not permitted.
f. Awnings must be made of glass, metal, or exterior grade fabric (or a combination
of these materials).
There is an existing canopy above the entry to the building; however the entry does not face the street.
The proposal only includes minor modifications to the existing canopy. The entryway will remain easily
accessible and protection from the elements for pedestrians will be improved.This standard is met.
E. Assure building quality, permanence and durability - Building Materials: The following
exterior building materials or finishes are prohibited:
1. Vinyl siding;
2. T-111 or similar sheet materials;
3. Plain concrete block (not including split faced, colored, or other block designs
that mimic stone, brick, or other masonry); foundation material may be skim-
coated concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more
than two feet;
4. Mirrored glass.
The proposal does not include any of the prohibited materials. This standard is met.
SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
A Downtown Design Review Compliance Letter is a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's
decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first.
The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City.
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 14, 2014.
AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 15, 2014.
DDR201400003 CITY HALL RESTORATION PAGE 3 OF 4
Questions:
If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division,Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
f May 14,2014
APPROVED BY: A es Kowacz DATE
Associate Planner
DDR2014-00003 CITY I IALI,RESTORATION PAGE 4 OF 4
RECEIVED
MAY 07 2014
lig City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD
Downtown Design Review FLANNING;I~NGINEERING
TIGARD Compliance Letter - Type I Application
■ w-mrv.m n a.-.m ✓
!GENERAL INFORMATION
Property Address/Location(s):
13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard. OR 97223 FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): Case No.(s): Wi2-2. %I1-1 —Cl._.)- 003
2S1 02 DA 00401
Site Size: Other Case No.(s):
Applicant*: City of.Tigard Fee: COSI-"O
Address: 13175 SW Hall Blvd. Receipt No.: I°156131
City/State: Tigard, OR Zip: 97223 Date: 511 I 141
Primary Contact: Kim McMillan Application Accepted By:
Phone:503 71g 2642 Fax: 503 674 0752 Date Determined Complete: 5/1
E-Mail: kini@tigard-or.gov Revised 6/24/2013
4 I:\CURPLN\Masters\land Use Applications\Downtown Dcvg n Kcview-Type I.docx
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*:
(Attach list if more than one)
City of Tigard REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd_ Phone:503.718.2642 (Applications will imi be accepted without the
City/State: Tigard, OR Zip:97793 following required submittal elements)
2' Application Form
Track 1:Design Review Compliance Letter Z.-- Owner's Signature/Written Authorization
A Design Compliance Letter provides for a Type I review process, ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed
using the clear and objective Design Standards. It is intended for la" Site Plan(4 Large Plans&1 Reduced to 8 t/s" x 11")
smaller buildings and site renovation projects, which meet the
threshold of 18.610.010.E.1. [' Applicant's Statement/Narrative(4 copies)
Filing Fee
Applicant's Statement/Narrative:
The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed
changes. Applicable criteria and design standards in 18.610 must be
addressed with a detailed response to each criterion. Failure to
provide the information needed to process the application would be
reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of
the proposal.
In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in
compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 of the Tigard
Development Code. To complete this review, the Applicant's
proposal must include a discussion indicating how other
requirements of this title are still satisfied. These requirements
include but are not limited to: access, landscaping and screening,
waste and recyclable storage, parking, sensitive lands, signs, tree
removal, vision clearance, and streets and utilities. Please see
section 18.610.035 of the Tigard Development Code for a complete
list.
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2
*When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)must sign this application
in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application.
Responsibility Statement: As the applicant submitting this application for a land use review, I certify that all of the above
statements and the statements in the site plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and I acknowledge that any
permit issued,based on this application may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. I am also responsible for
gaining the permission of the owner(s) of the property listed above in order to apply for this review and for reviewing the
responsibility statement with them. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with
the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions
that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,
including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. The City of Tigard
is not liable if any of these actions are taken without the consent of the owner(s)of the property. In order to process this review,
City staff may visit the site,photograph the property, or otherwise document the site as part of the review. By my signature, I
indicate my understanding and agreement to the Responsibility Statement.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this 44'1 day of r ,20
•
" ` AI_A4 AAL . .
Apphca /Authorized Agent's Signature Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature Owner's Signature
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2
1114 I .
City of Tigard
TIGARD Memorandum
To: City of Tigard, Planning Department
From: City of Tigard, Engineering Department
Re: Downtown Design Review for City of Tigard Permit Center
TL 2S1 02 DA 00401
Date: May 13,2014
Project Request
The Applicant, the City of Tigard,is requesting Design Review for the improvements as denoted on the
attached preliminary site plan and described in the Project Description below.
This application includes the required materials for the Downtown Design Review-Type I Application,
including:
• Completed Application Form with owner's signatures/written authorization
• Applicant's Statement/Narrative (this memo)
• Ownership documentation
• Landscape Removal Plan
• Landscape Material List
• Site/Plot Plans
Project Description
Several areas of failing or compromised Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) stucco on the
Permit Center,City Hall,and Police Department buildings will be removed and replaced. Along
with these improvements, facade modifications will also be made to the entryway canopy between
the Permit Center and City Hall,a window will be added on the south wall of the Permit Center.
Because of the proximity of the vegetation surrounding the structures,demolition of the existing
landscaping and installation of new landscaping will also be included;however all landscaping
activity will remain in the existing beds and no additional beds will be created.
It is the opinion of the Applicant that this project would be considered a "Track 1"project because
it is a smaller building/site renovation project and it meets the threshold of paragraph 18.610.010
(E1) and the definition found in Section 18.610.010 (D.1.a) as demonstrated as in the following
narrative.
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 1
Application Narrative
The purpose of this section is to demonstrate that the proposed improvements meet all the applicable
standards and requirements of the:
City of Tigard Development Code,Title 18 Section 610—Tigard Downtown Plan District
City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual, Section 7
CITY OF TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE
(Tide 18 Section 610—Tigard Downtown Plan District)
• 18.610.010 Purpose and Procedures
D. Downtown design review approval process
1. To achieve the purpose of the downtown site and building design standards, there are three
methods or"tracks" to apply for approval:
Response: This is a smaller building and site renovation project and meets the criteria
indicated for a "Track 1" project because it meets the threshold of paragraph 18.610.010
(E.1) and the definition found in Section 18.610.010 (D.1.a).
E. Procedures
1. Track 1: Design review compliance letter using design standards.
a. Applicability
i. Addition, elimination, or change in location of windows that does not decrease
the minimum required window coverage;
Response:There is no decrease to the window coverage.
ii. Addition, elimination, or change in location of entry doors and loading doors;
Response:There is no change to the location of entry or loading doors.
iii. Addition of new and change to existing awnings,canopies,and other mounted
structures to an existing façade;
Response:The facrade improvements criteria are as follows per 18.610.030:
4. Weather protection.
For nonresidential and mixed use buildings:
a. A projecting façade element (awning,canopy, arcade,or marquee) is required
on the street-facing façade of the street with the highest functional
classification.
Response:Not applicable.
b. Awnings/marquees/canopies may project a minimum of three feet and a
maximum of six feet from the façade (a maximum of four feet into the
public right-of-way).
Response:Not applicable.
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 2
c. The element shall have a minimum 10-foot clearance from the bottom of the
element to the sidewalk.
Response:The clearance distance will exceed the minimum requirement.
d. Awnings must match the width of storefronts or window openings.
Response:There are no awnings as part of this project.
e. Internally lit awnings are not permitted.
Response:There are no awnings as part of this project.
f. Awnings must be made of glass,metal,or exterior grade fabric (or a
combination of these materials).
Response:There are no awnings as part of this project
iv. For commercial and mixed use developments,modification of up to 15%on-site
landscaping with no reduction in required landscaping. Modification refers to
changing the hardscape elements and the location of required landscape areas
and/or trees;
Response: There will not be a reduction in the area of landscaping.
v. Modification of off-street parking with no reduction in required parking spaces
or increase in paved area;
Response:There will be no reduction in parking spaces or paved area.
vi. Addition of new fences,retaining walls,or both;
Response: There will be no additional fences or retaining walls as part of this
project.
vii. Changing of existing grade;
Response:There will be no change of grading as part of this project.
viii.An increase in the height of the building(s) less than 20%;
Response:The height of the structure will not increase.
ix. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site
traffic would not be affected;
Response: There is no change to the location of the access ways or parking
areas.
x. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by less than 10%
or under 5,000 square feet;
Response:There is no change to the floor area as part of this project.
xi. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open
space which does not reduce the open space area below the minimum required
by this code or reduces the open space area by less than 10%. An increase in
dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development;
Response:There will be no decrease of area reserved for common/open space.
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 3
• 18.610.020 Building and Site Development Standards
A. Sub-areas. The four sub-areas located on Map 18.610.A and described below have different
setback and height limits in order to create a feeling of distinct districts within the larger zone.
1. Fanno - Burnham Street. This sub-area provides an opportunity for medium scale residential
or mixed use development. Compatible mixed uses (live-work, convenience retail, office and
civic uses) are encouraged on the frontage of Burnham Street. The area in proximity to
Fanno Creek Park will be an opportunity to create a high quality residential environment
with views and access to the natural amenity of Fanno Creek Park. Building heights will step
down to three stories so as not to overwhelm or cast shadows on the park.
Response: According to Map 18.610.A the project lies within the boundaries of
the Fanno-Burnham Street sub-area.
B. Development standards. Development standards apply to all new development in the MU-CBD
zone,including developments utilizing the Track 3 approval process.Variances or adjustments
may be granted if the criteria found in Chapter 18.370 are satisfied.
1. Development standards matrix. See Table 18.610.1 and Map 18.610.A.
Response: Per footnote ' for table 16.610, the standards do not apply to existing
structures such as the one indicated in this application.
• 18.610.025 Connectivity
A. Purpose statement.The purpose of this section is to implement the City of Tigard 2035
Transportation System Plan which describes a more complete system of streets and pathways to
improve multi-modal access to, from and within the downtown mixed use central business
district.The standards in this section are intended to execute connectivity improvement projects
that will foster creation of smaller block sizes, efficient routes into and within downtown, and
new streets to accommodate and encourage downtown development.The standards are also
intended to solve some existing connectivity issues, such as access across railroad tracks.
B. Applicability. The connectivity standards in this section apply only to those properties with
designated streets or alleys as shown on Figures 5-14A through 5-14I of the City of Tigard 2035
Transportation System Plan. Development on properties with designated streets or alleys is
subject to the connectivity requirements below.
Response:According to Figures 5-14A through 5-14I of the City of Tigard
2035 Transportation System Plan, there are no designated streets or alleys
required for this property, therefore this entire section, Section 18.610.025
"Connectivity" is not applicable to this project.
• 18.610.030 Building and Site Design Standards
A. Create vibrant ground floors. streetscapes and rights-of-way;provide weather protection; and
promote safety and security.
Intent. Design standards in this section are intended to foster vibrant,inviting streetscapes
and sidewalk-facing ground floors and entryways. They are also intended to create buildings
that are easily accessible to and provide protection from the elements for pedestrians.They
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 4
•
also will help ensure that the ground floor promotes a sense of interaction between activities
in the building and activities in the public realm. Building and site design should also address
crime prevention through defensible spaces lighting,and features that allow observation and
"eyes on the street."
1 Street facade.
a Street-facing facades shall be built in proximity to the street.This standard is met
when at least 50%of the ground floor front building elevation(s) is located no
further from the front property line than the maximum front setback standard
established in Table 18.610.1;and,where maximum street-facing side setbacks are
required within the Main Street sub-area,at least 50% of the ground floor street-
facing side building elevation(s) is located no further from the street-facing side
property line than the maximum street-facing side setback standard established in
Table 18.610.Addition,elimination,or change in location of windows that does not
decrease the minimum required window coverage;
Response: Project not located in the Main Street Sub-area. Not applicable.
2 Primary entry.
a For commercial/mixed use buildings:
i At least one entry door is required for each business with a ground floor
frontage.
Response: Building exceeds the number of entry doors per business.
ii Each entrance shall be covered,recessed,or treated with a permanent
architectural feature in such a way that weather protection is provided.
Response: Project not a residential dwelling. Not applicable.
iii All primary ground-floor common entries shall be oriented to the street or a
public space directly facing the street,not to the interior or to a parking lot.
Response: Project entry is unable to be re-oriented to the street. Not
applicable.
b For residential buildings:
i Entry door. The primary public entrance to each building unit shall be covered,
recessed,or treated with a permanent architectural feature in such a way that
weather protection is provided.
Response: Project not a residential dwelling. Not applicable.
ii All primary ground-floor common entries of multifamily buildings and individual
unit entries of attached single-family units that front the street shall be oriented
to the street or public right-of-way,not to the interior or to a parking lot.
Response: The facade improvements criteria are as follows per 18.610.030:
Response: Project not a residential dwelling. Not applicable.
3 Windows.
a Ground floor windows for nonresidential and mixed use buildings:
i 60%minimum ground floor window coverage for street-facing wall (minimum
window coverage includes any glazed portions of doors).
Response: Project is not a street facing structure. Not applicable.
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 5
ii Ground floor window transparency.All buildings with nonresidential ground
floor windows must have a visible transmittance (VT) of 0.6 or higher,with the
exception of medical and dental offices,which may have tinted windows.
Response: Not applicable.
b Ground floor windows for residential buildings: 30%minimum ground floor
window coverage for street-facing wall (minimum window coverage includes any
glazed portions of doors).
Response: Project not a residential dwelling. Not applicable.
c Upper floor windows/doors for all buildings:
i 30%minimum upper floor window coverage for each floor of the street-facing
wall (minimum window coverage includes any glazed portions of doors).
Response: Project does not have upper floor. Not applicable.
ii The required upper floor window/balcony door percentage does not apply to
floors where sloped roofs and dormer windows are used.
Response: Project does not have upper floor. Not applicable.
iii Upper floor windows shall be vertically oriented (a minimum vertical to
horizontal dimension ratio of 1.5:1).
Response: Project does not have upper floor. Not applicable.
d Window shadowing for all buildings:Windows shall be designed to provide
shadowing.This can be accomplished by recessing windows three inches into the
facade and/or incorporating trim of a contrasting material or color.
Response: Not applicable.
4 Weather protection.
For nonresidential and mixed use buildings:
a A projecting façade element (awning,canopy,arcade,or marquee) is required on the
street-facing façade of the street with the highest functional classification.
Response:Not applicable.
b Awnings/marquees/canopies may project a minimum of three feet and a maximum
of six feet from the façade (a maximum of four feet into the public right-of-way).
Response:Not applicable.
c The element shall have a minimum 10-foot clearance from the bottom of the
element to the sidewalk.
Response:The clearance distance will exceed the minimum requirement.
d Awnings must match the width of storefronts or window openings.
Response:There are no awnings as part of this project.
e Internally lit awnings are not permitted.
Response:There are no awnings as part of this project.
f Awnings must be made of glass,metal,or exterior grade fabric (or a combination of
these materials).
Response:There are no awnings as part of this project
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 6
B. Cohesive architectural facade standards.
Intent. Build and expand upon downtown Tigard's architectural character by incorporating
cohesive and repetitive architectural elements into the ground floor of street-facing facades.
Response:Not applicable.
C. Integrated building facade standards.
Intent. Build upon and improve downtown Tigard's architecture by creating an attractive
and unified building facade that encourages ground floor activities,and creates visually
interesting facades and roofs.
Response:Not applicable.
D. Create street corners with strong identity.
Intent. Create a strong architectural statement at street corners. Establish visual landmarks
and enhance visual variety.
Response:Not applicable.
E. Assure building quality,permanence and durability.
Intent. Use building materials that evoke a sense of permanence and are compatible with
Downtown Tigard and the surrounding built and natural environment.
Response:Not applicable.
F. Open space/public plaza.
Intent:Assure adequate public,private and shared outdoor space.
Response:Not applicable.
CITY OF TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL
(Section 7)
• Section 7 -Development Tree Removal and Replacement Standards
Part 1. Development Tree Removal Standards:
A. Trees subject to the requirements of Chapter 8.12 shall be removed in a manner consistent with
tree care industry standards.
Response: Trees will be removed in a manner which conforms to the
standards.
B. The city manager or designee shall approve the removal of trees subject to the requirements of
Chapter 8.12 if any one of the following criteria [on page 7-1 of the Urban Forestry Manual] are
met:
Response:Trees to be removed have been determined to be in advanced
stages of decline with insufficient live foliage. In addition,some trees are
causing damage to the sidewalks. These responses meet two of the
needed one criterion for accepted removal.
C. Unless removed for thinning purposes (Part 1.B.11 above) the city manager or designee shall
condition the removal of each tree upon the planting of a replacement tree in accordance with
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 7
the Development'free Replacement Standards in Section 7,part 2 of the Urban Forestry
Manual.
Response:Trees will be removed in accordance with Section 7, Part 2 of
the Urban Forestry Manual.
D. If the Development Tree Replacement Standards in Section 7,part 2 preclude replanting within
the same property as the tree that was removed, the applicant shall be exempt from planting a
replacement tree.
Response: Trees will be planted on the same property in approximately
the same location.
Part 2. Development Tree Replacement Standards:
A. Replacement trees shall be planted in a manner consistent with tree care industry standards.
Response:Trees will be removed in a manner which conforms to the
Urban Forestry Manual standards.
B. The replacement tree shall be located so as to replace the function of the tree that was removed.
Response: Trees will be planted in approximately the same location as the
removed tree.
C. The replacement species shall be the same stature or greater (at maturity) as the tree that was
removed.
Response: Trees to be planted will be the same stature or greater than
those which are to be removed. See Tree Replacement List.
D. If the tree that was removed was part of a stand of trees, then the following standards apply to
the replacement tree:
Response: Trees to be removed are not part of a stand of trees.
E. If the tree that was removed was an open grown tree, then the following standards apply to the
replacement tree:
1. The replacement tree shall be selected from any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry
Manual (except the nuisance tree list) unless otherwise approved by the city manager or
designee;
Response: Trees to be replaced have been selected from the
recommended tree list shown as Appendix 3 of the Urban Forestry
Manual and are specified on the memo from the Mears Design Group (see
attached).
2. The minimum size of the replacement tree shall be 11/2 inch caliper for deciduous or 6
feet in height for evergreen; and
Response: The minimum size of the replacement trees shall meet or
exceed the minimum requirements.
3. The replacement tree shall be located [per Sub Sections "a" through "h" of the Urban
Forestry Manual].
Response: Trees will be located per the Urban Forestry Manual standards.
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 8
F. The city manager or designee may consider existing trees as replacement trees if they meet all
applicable species, size,condition and location requirements in this Section and were not already
required to be planted or preserved by the Tigard Municipal Code.
Response: Not applicable.
G. The city manager or designee may allow for an"in lieu of planting fee" equivalent to the city's
cost to plant a tree per the standards in this Section and maintain a tree per the standards in
section 8.12.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code for a period of three years after planting.
Payment of an in lieu of planting fee shall satisfy the Development tree replacement
requirement.
Response: Not applicable.
Project Summary
As indicated in this report,this project meets,exceeds,or is exempt from,the approval requirements
as specified by the Tigard Downtown Plan District and Urban Forestry Manual. Therefore, the
Applicant respectfully requests approval of this Downtown Design Review Applications.
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 9
EXHIBIT A
City of Tigard:Downtown Design Review Application
(City Hall,police and permit Center Re-skin TL 2S102DA00401) Page 10
MPR OREGON 9728 PORTLAND, PO Box 23338
503.60 I .45 16 TEL
DESIGN .GROUP 503.924.4688 FAx
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&PLANNING
PROJECT MEMORANDUM
To: City of Tigard Project: City of Tigard —Wrap Landscape Project
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
File No.
Attn: Karleen Aichele Date: May 13, 2014
Subject: Suggested Project Tree List
1. Acer rubrum 'Franksred' (Red Sunset Maple)
2. Acer rubrum 'Scarsen' (Scarlet Sentinel Maple)
3. Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku' (Coral Bark Maple)
4. Cornus 'Eddie's White Wonder' (Eddie's White Wonder Dogwood)
5. Chamaecyparis obtuse 'Gracilis' (Slender Hinoki Cypress)
6. Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem' (Little Gem Magnolia)
7. Pyrus calleryana 'Glen's Form' (Chanticleer Pear)
8. Styrax japonicus (Japanese Snowbell)
9. Thuja plicata 'Virescens' (Virescens Cedar)
10. Zelkova serrata 'Green Vase' (Green Vase Zelkova)
We may not use all of the trees listed above.
Please give me a call or email with any questions or comments.
Thank you.
Troy Mears
Landscape Architect
TROY A MEARS troym@ mearsdesigngroup.com
v __
„3- — 1 e e WI - - — — — — — 8 o `pis' `+.�s' \ LEGEND
_ ,.., 0
—DENOTES REMOVE ALL TREES,SHRUBS,
I J 1 GROUNDCOVER AND ROOTS AS IDENTIFIED
I O U ON PLANS.
I a 1
„,
• ALL TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE
REMOVED WITHIN IDENTIFIED AREAS
I WILL BE TAGGED PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
-BUILDING LANDSCAPE PLANTER REMOVE
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE VEGETATION WITHIN EXISTING PLANTING BED
I TO BE REMOVED-TYPICAL x AREAS AS INDICATED ON PLANS.
�, r ��\I _ I
AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDING WHERE• REMOVE EXCESS P \ CROWNED.MAINTAIN CONSISTENT SLOPE
I fa (tixi 1 --- - I I / TOO PLANTING BED ADJACENT
OR HARD SURFACE
- _ ^` (LE.CURB.SIDEWALK)AND LAWN AREA.
• SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS.
a ,y. I j I I I m f'1
/* �' I I DENOTES AREA OF WORK LIMITS FOR
All' I I I_; LANDSCAPE REMOVAL PROJECT
SKATE PARK
er ,#,,„
- I I I `� DENOTES CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING
lI I I - AS DECIDUOUS OWN ON PLANS.
TREES AND STUMPS
- - I � I I I '/,\
J - x I I • EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVES.VALVE BOXES.
�_ INDICATES WORK AREA I SPRINKLERS.PLUMBING.ETC.ARE TO REMAIN IN
WORKING CONDITION.IF WHILE CLEARING AND
GRUBBING OF PLANT MATERIAL PORTIONS OF EXISTING
LIMITS-TYPICAL IRRIGATION ARE DAMAGED CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY
I�P/L _ INDICATES WORK AREA I THE CITY'SREPRESENTATIVEANDNOTEONPL NS.
I LIMITS-TYPICAL
EXISTING CONIFER TREE /�/. I I I • CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT E C.DURING CONSTRUCTION ONSTRUCTIONLK,
/ �lt� PROCESS.NCONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE TO CTON
TO REMAIN-TYPICAL r' `` I REPAIR/REPLACE ALL DAMAGED AREAS DUE TO
j // t CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO FINAL PAYMENT.DUE TO
/�� I •�i�,�`_I - -- a • QUALITY OF EXISTING PARKING LOT CURBS
\
p �i""""""""""""'�' p;:.....0 I ` -�` -_ - - - - - - - - / CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY OR REQUIRED ISSUES WITH CITY t;... r a • 6�'KKRIgft�iNG TREES TO
_ - Ij lO 1
REMAIN ROOTS.CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO FOLLOW
1 CITY TREE PROTECTION STANDARDS.
j�� EXISTING CONIFER TREE EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREES I
TO REMAIN-TYPICAL TO REMAIN-TYPICAL R/W
EXISTING SHRUBS AND iA �— -— —
GROUND COVER TO BE J � '` �/�
REMOVED THIS AREA. ALL w_ /� ,�`�� `I �ct� 72 `"Q a '
EXISTING LANDSCAPE _� ° " ` _ tus7 to3 III
BOULDERS TO BE SAVED '{ ; y 7
�1 FOR FUTURE LANDSCAPE ����j��' I
DESIGN-COORDINATE WITH # 1 ti �� �/
CITY REPRESENTATIVE- � \ - �� ni
TYPICAL. I I '���4 '� EXISTING SHRUBS AND GROUND
4 *Is. ( /�%- COVER TO BE REMOVED THIS
I POLICE Q ` /�•��J� EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE AREA. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE ' a
` '", TO BE REMOVED-TYPICAL BOULDERS TO BE SAVED FOR
/ /�� .� FUTURE LANDSCAPE DESIGN- I I
i COORDINATE WITH CITY
t v /��` ' �- I _ REPRESENTATIVE-TYPICAL.
.r.. Ni r 'i'- �- iiii CITY OF TI i I ,►. �/I PJ , v 11111P.44- TIGARD
I o - r �� ��� Condrti•Wally Approved -- .?�I
JOE HAYES MEMORIAL GARDEN: IL u� �i %��� //^/,/,,,,,,/' � ... I Por o�I the work as described in:
CONTRACTOR TO RETAIN; - - _ . ' PERM! NO. Ot 2o14 OOC�03
BENCH,MEMORIAL BOULDER I , -- FLAG POLE `u• l I See Let erto: Follow..._.»...•».-•_._-.--•.- [ 1
\ AND CLEMATIS PLANTINGS THIS '. / I/i 1 J
I AREA. VERIFY PRIOR TO - - - . _ 40/// Attach--- •.. ---•-[ j
BEGINNING WORK $ rJL 'y",-� ��Y r -S-- FLAG POLE I I Cy: . •d ess: 11312_' SW 1"t�11,t Pte`\ .)
I , .JI -EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ' .
I -TYPICAL •, / ya I I II
t I I I / i. EXISTING CONIFER TREE TO
CITY (PLANNING/ENGINEERING) BUILDING BEREMOVED-TYPICAL I I
a
1,, I CITY HALL MAIN BUILDING
as I _ v
INDICATES WORK AREA 1/ I I -- O , a
al
0
1 SCALE: 1"=20'-0"
LIMITS-TYPICAL INDICATES WORK AREA-�
a[ I I I LIMITS-TYPICAL I•rF; -' ' ��—
Fi(t A� L�M '� I I ' o 10 20 40
!R
0 I e I/ 4
L° I �+ J I� ' "° CITY OF TIGARD RE—SKIN "0100
VA h E'..�� f%,,.� _ I , . :•171 LANDSCAPE REMOVAL PLAN
I
TIGARD•••"r+""-rcy CITY HALL.POLICE DEPARTMENT & PERMIT CENTER NO r.
Agnes Kowacz
From: Greg Berry
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 5:08 PM
To: Agnes Kowacz
Cc: Kim McMillan
Subject: RE: DDR2014-00003 City Hall
I have reviewed the plans and have no comments.
From: Agnes Kowacz
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 3:37 PM
To: Greg Berry
Cc: Kim McMillan
Subject: DDR2014-00003 City Hall
Hi Greg-
Please provide comments/conditions for this City Hall project.Thanks,
Agnes Kowacz I Associate Planner
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
503.718.2427
agnesk @tigard-or.gov
DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail
may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained
by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule."
1