Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SUB2001-00005
SUB2001 - 00005 ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION NOM OF rePE.i DECISION S IVOION. B ) 200140005 CITY OF TIGARD ttOlt R) 1001 400i 3 Community Deveiopment ShapingA Better Community ESAU STATES 120 DAYS = 12/12/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION CASE NOS.: Subdivision (SUB) SUB2001-00005 Variance (VAR) VAR2001-00012 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet of the common lot lines of lots 2-3, 4-5 and 5-6. APPLICANT: Bill McMonagle. OWNER: James & Audrey Castile Harris-McMonagle Associates 8100 SW Durham Road 12555 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. ZONE: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION N�a .� `iii hereby given that the Ci . of Tigard 0O nity Development Director's designee has A I `OVED the above request and Te associated va Vices subject to certain conditions of approval. The'fndings and conclusions on whit i the decision is based are noted in Section VI of this Decision. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 1 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING GRADING, EXCAVATION, AND/OR FILL, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 317) for review and approval: 1. The applicant must develop lot#2 as an attached unit to the existing single-family home on lot#1, or remove the garage on lot #1 that would otherwise be in violation of the side yard setback requirement. 2. Provide a plan showing the building footprints for the proposed lots. If attached single-family dwellings are proposed, the applicant must provide buffering and screening according to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix). 3. Submit a plan showing street trees to planted along Tract "A" and the remainder of the site that fronts SW Greenburg Road according to the size and spacing standards of Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code. 4. Provide a plan showing the size of all trees located on the site. If there are any trees that are 12-inches or greater, the applicant must provide a tree protection plan and mitigation plan for trees 12-inches and greater to be removed. Tree protection and removal plans will be reviewed and signed off by the City of Tigard Arborist. 5. Pay Traffic Impact Fee of approximately $9,040.00. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the public and private improvements within the development and any other work in the public right-of-way. Eight (8) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 7. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 8. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 9. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private street shall meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street. 10. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 2 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION 11. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private stormwater detention facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) as a part of the public improvement plans. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $180.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). 13. The final plat shall contain a restriction that states that Lots 1 and 6 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Greenburg Road. 14. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private street will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it. 15. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and agreement for the proposed private street. The CC&R's shall obligate the private property owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of maintenance for the street. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) prior to approval of the final plat. 16. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have formed and incorporated a homeowner's association. 17. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Greenburg Road underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,338.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. 18. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private stormwater detention facility will be jointly owned and maintained by the developer or by the future homeowners within the subdivision. 19. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and agreement for the proposed private stormwater detention facility. The CC&R's shall obligate the private property owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of maintenance for the facility. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) prior to approval of the final plat. 20. Prior to approval of the final lat, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development, which includes the new public street and sidewalk areas. In addition, a standard value of 2,640 sf of hard surface is assessed to each individual lot. Payment of the fee can be split into two parts: 1) the portion based on surface area of new streets and sidewalk shall be paid by the applicant prior to approval of the final plat, 2) the portion assessed to each lot can be paid at the time building permits are issued for the individual lots. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) with surface area calculations for the streets and sidewalk in order for the fee under "1)" above to be calculated. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 3 OF 22 SUB2001-00005/VAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION 21. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 22. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 23. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 24. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and require submittal and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the home building phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits. 25. Prior to issuance of building permits within the subdivision, the public improvements shall be deemed substantially complete by the City Engineer. Substantial completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for compliance, including franchise utilities, 2) all local residential streets have at least one lift of asphalt, 3) any off-site street and/or utility improvements are substantially completed, and 4) all street lights are installed and ready to be energized. (NOTE: model home permits may be issued loy the City apart from this condition, and in accordance with the City's model home policy). IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST: 18.430.080 Improvement Agreement: Before City approval is certified on the final plat, and before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shall: 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the subdivider. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 4 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. 18.430.090 Bond: As required by Section 18.430.080, the subdivider shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2. A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3. Cash. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. The subdivider shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. 18.430.100 Filing and Recording: Within 60 days of the City review and approval, the applicant shall submit the final plat to the County for signatures of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92. Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall submit to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 18.430.070 Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: Three copies of the subdivision plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. The subdivision plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS: Centerline Monumentation In accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 92.060, subsection (2), the centerline of all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be monumented before the City accepts a street improvement. The following centerline monuments shall be set: 1. All centerline-centerline intersection points; 2. All cul-de-sac center points; and 3. Curve points, beginning and ending points (PC's and PT's). All centerline monuments shall be set during the first lift of pavement. Monument Boxes Required Monument boxes conforming to City standards will be required around all centerline intersection points, cul-de-sac center points, and curve points. The tops of all monument boxes shall be set to finished pavement grade. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 5 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION 18.810 Street & Utility Improvement Standards: 18.810.120 Utilities All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface-mounted transformers, surface-mounted connection boxes, and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required All improvements installed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.810.180. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. 18.810.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. 18.810.200 Engineer's Certification The land divider's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to the City acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. '" '''°'° SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records and found no other land-use cases associated with the parcels of the subdivision. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There are single-family homes on two of the lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard setback from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet of the common lot lines of lots 2-3, 4-5 and 5-6. Vicinity Information: The proposed development is north of SW Greenburg Road and west of SW 97th Court. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 6 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Subdivision — General Provisions 18.430.020 Subdivision — (General Provisions) B. Subdivision — Approval Criteria C. Applicable Development Code Sections 18.370 Variances and Adjustments) 18.510 Residential zoning districts) 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation) 18.715 Density) 18.745 Landscaping and screening) 18.765 Off-street parking and loading requirements) 18.790 Tree removal) 18.795 Vision clearance) D. Street and Utility Improvement 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) E. Impact Study (18.390) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of these Specific Development Standard Code Chapters: 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.740 (Historic Overlay), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations), 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.760 (Nonconforming situations), 18.775 (Sensitive Lands), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.797 (Water Resources Overlay District), and 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A — SUBDIVISION GENERAL PROVISIONS: Future Re-Division. When subdividing tracts into large lots, the Approval Authority shall require that the lots be of such size and shape as to facilitate future re-division in accordance with the requirements of the zoning district and this title. The minimum lot size for the R-12 zoning district is 3,050 square feet. Proposed lot sizes do not exceed 5,104 square feet. Therefore, none of the lots are large enough to divide in the future. Lot Size Averaging: Section 18.430.020.D states Lot size may be averaged to allow lots less than the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying zoning district as long as the average lot area for all lots is not less than allowed by the underlying zoning district. No lot created under this provision shall be less than 80% of the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying zoning district. The proposed lot sizes are between 3,019 and 5,104 square feet. Therefore, the average lot size is approximately 3,779 square feet. According to the criterion above, no lot created under the lot size averaging provision shall be less than 80% of the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying zoning district. Eighty percent of the minimum lot size (3,050 square feet) is 2,440 square feet. The smallest of the lots is 3,019 square feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 7 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Phased Development: The Approval Authority may approve a time schedule for developing a subdivision in phases, but in no case shall the actual construction time period for any phase be greater than two years without reapplying for a preliminary plat; The criteria for approving a phased site development review proposal are: a.)The public facilities shall be scheduled to be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase to ensure provision of public facilities prior to building occupancy- b.) The development and occupancy of any phase shall not be dependent on the use of temporary public facilities: For purposes of this subsection, a temporary public facility is an interim facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard; and The ased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required as a part of the approval of the preliminary plat. The application for phased development approval shall be reviewed concurrently with the preliminary plat application and the decision may be appealed in the same manner as the preliminary plat. The applicant has not proposed a phased development, therefore, this standard does not apply. B — SUBDIVISION APPROVAL CRITERIA Approval Standards — Preliminary Plat: The proposed preliminary plat complies with the applicable zoning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and regulations. Compliance with the specific regulations and standards of the zoning ordinance will be addressed further within this decision. The proposed plat name must not be duplicative and must otherwise satisfy the provisions of ORS Chapter 92. The applicant has provided evidence that the proposed subdivision name has been reserved with Washington County, thus insuring that the name is not duplicative. The Streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of major partitions or subdivisions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects unless the City determines it is in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern. Street layout is discussed in more detail, and conditioned if necessary, under the 18.810 (Street and Utility) section of this decision. An explanation has been provided for all common improvements. The applicant has provided an explanation for all common improvements as required and, therefore, satisfied this criterion. Specific details of the proposed improvements are discussed later in this decision under the Street and Utility Improvement Standards section 18.810. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the proposal meets, the preliminary plat approval standards for subdivisions. C — APPLICABLE TIGARD DEVELOMENT CODE SECTIONS Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Section 18.370.020.C.1.a states there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property which are unusual and peculiar to the land as compared to other lands similarly situated; There are two (2) parcels involved in this subdivision, each containing a single-family home. Minimum density requirements dictate that the proposed subdivision contain at least six (6) lots. As proposed, that would be two (2) with the existing homes and 4 new buildable lots. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 8 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION The adjustment is necessary for the proper design or function of the subdivision; The proposed subdivision will retain the two (2) existing houses. In so doing, the minimum density requirement and dimensional and lot area requirements for the R-12 zone are such that a reduction in side yards as described above is necessary. The granting of the adjustment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of property; and Granting the requested adjustments will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of surrounding properties. The development is as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. Single-family homes will be constructed with a 1-foot reduction in side yard requirements. This reduction will still provide for adequate air, light and safety areas around the homes, the major rationale for side yards. The adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary hardship which would result from strict compliane with the regulations of this title. It is not economically feasible to demolish the two existing houses and redesign the subdivision. They are structurally sound and have many years of residential use remaining. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Special adjustment criteria have been met. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510) Lists the description of the residential Zoning District. The site is located in the R-12: Medium-Density residential zoning district. The R-12 zoning district has the following dimensional requirements: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-7 Minimum Lot Size 3,050 sq. ft. Detached unit Duplexes -Attached unit [1] Average Minimum Lot Width None Maximum Lot Coverage 80% [2] Minimum Setbacks Front yard 15 ft. Side facing street on corner & through lots 10 ft. Side yard 5 ft. Rear yard 15 ft. Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 30 ft. Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. Maximum Height 35 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement 20% [1] Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. The proposed lots range in size from 3,019 square feet to 5,104 square feet. The applicant has applied for and received approval to reduce the setbacks from 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2- 3, 4-5 and 5-6. The applicant is also proposing to develop lot 2 as an attached unit to the pre-existing single-family home on lot #1. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to develop lot #2 as an attached unit to the existing single-family home on lot #1, or remove the garage on lot #1 that would otherwise be in violation of the side yard setback requirement. NOTICE OF DECISION— PAGE 9 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012—ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the residential zoning district dimensional standards have not been satisfied. CONDITION: The applicant must develop lot #2 as an attached unit to the existing single-family home on lot #1, or remove the garage on lot #1 that would otherwise be in violation of the side yard setback requirement. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Chapter 18.705 establishes standards and regulations for safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on a site and for general circulation within the site. Table 18.705.1 states that the minimum vehicular access and egress for single-family dwelling units on individual lots shall be one, 10-foot paved driveway within a 15-foot-wide accessway. The minimum access width for 3-6 dwelling units is 20 feet with 20 feet of pavement. The access and egress into the site itself is discussed later in this decision under the Street and Utility Standards section of this decision (18.810). Access to individual lots will be reviewed for compliance during the building permit phase. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Scaled site plans have been submitted that indicate how the requirements of access, egress, and circulation are met. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Joint access is proposed over a tract of land for lots 1-6. The joint access labeled "Tract A" on the site plan is a separate piece of land, outside the boundaries of all proposed parcels. Therefore, this standard has been met. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Based on the plans submitted, all of the proposed lots will take access from "Tract A" which will connect to SW Green burg Road, a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 10 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. Driveways and curb cuts will be reviewed for compliance during the building permit phase. Inadequate or hazardous access: Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, the access proposed would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety and general welfare. Based on the plan submitted by the applicant, Staff can not foresee any hazardous conditions associated with the proposed access. Therefore, this criterion is met. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. The proposed single-family lots will have access, via a private street (Tract A), which connects to SW Greenburg Road. Therefore, this standard has been met. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. The proposed subdivision is for single-family homes. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum access requirements for residential use: Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2; Vehicular access to individual lots will be reviewed during the building permit phase. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Vehicular access to multi-family structures shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance or the ground floor landing of a stairway, ramp, or elevator leading to the dwelling units; No multi-family structures are proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform fire Code; Vehicular access to individual lots will be reviewed during the building permit phase. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Section 18.705.030.H.4 states that Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet or a hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. The private street is approximately 135 feet in length, therefore, no turn around for fire apparatus is required. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 11 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been satisfied. Density Computations and Limitations: Chapter 18.715 implements the Comprehensive Plan by establishing the criteria for determining the number of dwelling units permitted. The number of allowable dwelling units is based on the net development area. The net area is the remaining parcel area after exclusion of sensitive lands and land dedicated for public roads or parks. The net area is then divided by the minimum lot size permitted by the zoning district to determine the number of dwelling units that may be developed on a site. Based on the formulas in Chapter 18.715 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code, the maximum and minimum number of units permitted on the site are based on the net developable area, subtracting sensitive land areas, land dedicated to public parks, land dedicated for public right-of-way and land for private streets from the total site area. Of the total site area (26,264 square feet), 3,585 square feet is subtracted for the proposed roadway Tract "A" and 8,573 square feet for pre-existing structures on proposed lots #1 and #5. No wetlands or land dedicated to the public for parks is associated with this development. The site lies adjacent to SW Greenburg Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. The roadway is fully improved, therefore, no right-of-way dedication is required. This results in a net developable area of 14,106 square feet. Therefore, the maximum number of dwelling units permitted on this site is 4 and the minimum number 3. The applicant is proposing to keep the 2-existing homes and create 4 additional lots. Therefore, this section is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density standards have been satisfied. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Chapter 18.745 contains landscaping provisions for new development. Section 18.745.100 requires that street trees be planted in conjunction with all development that fronts a street or driveway more than 100 feet long. A proposed planting list must be submitted for review by the Director since certain trees can damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or cause personal injury. Section 18.745.040.0 contains specific standards for spacing of street trees as follows: • Small or narrow stature trees (under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching) shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; • Medium sized trees (25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching) shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; and • Large trees (over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching) shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The applicant proposes to provide a private street that is approximately 135 feet in length and has 165 feet of frontage along SW Greenburg Road. However, the applicant has not proposed to plant trees along the proposed drive or the frontage along SW Greenburg Road. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to submit a plan showing street trees to planted along Tract "A" and the remainder of the site that fronts SW Greenburg Road according to the size and spacing standards of Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code. Section 18.745.050 contains the provisions and requirements for buffering and screening. The Buffering and Screening Matrix (Section 18.745.1) does not require buffering or screening when a single-family detached residential use is proposed adjacent to existing detached single-family dwellings. However, buffering and screening does apply to attached single-family dwellings when they are adjacent to detached single-family dwellings. The applicant has indicated that the existing home on lot #1 will be attached to the proposed single-family home on lot #2. The proposed Esau Estates is separated from the adjoining property to the east by SW 97th Court. Therefore, no buffering or screening will be required for lot #1 and #2. However, Staff cannot determine if attached units will be developed on any of the other 4 lots. The applicant will be required to provide a plan showing building footprints for the undeveloped lots. If attached single-family dwellings are proposed, the applicant must provide buffering and screening according to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix). NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 12 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that all of the landscaping and screening standards have been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Provide a plan showing the building footprints for the proposed lots. If attached single-family dwellings are proposed, the applicant must provide buffering and screening according to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix). Submit a plan showing street trees to planted along Tract "A" and the remainder of the site that fronts SW Greenburg Road according to the size and spacing standards of Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements (18.765): Chapter 18.765, Table 18.765.2 requires that single-family residences be provided with one (1) off-street parking space for each dwelling unit. Compliance with this standard will be enforced during the building permit review process. Since the Code requires 20 feet from the property line to the face of a garage, this will insure that at least one car can park off of the street, outside of any garage. FINDING: Because each individual home will be reviewed for compliance with this standard during the building permit phase and it is feasible that this standard will be met by providing driveways and garages, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal: Chapter 18.790 requires mitigation of trees over 12" diameter at breast height (dbh) removed as part of the development of the site. The applicant states in the narrative that there are no trees with a diameter of 12-inches within the building footprints of the proposed lots. The site plan shows that there are trees located on the site, however the applicant has not provided the diameter inches of the trees on the site and whether or not they will be removed. The site plan does not show proposed building footprints but does show trees to be located within the estimated driveway location on proposed lot #4. Therefore, the applicant must provide a plan showing the size of all trees located on the site. If there are any trees that are 12-inches or greater, the applicant must provide a tree protection plan and mitigation plan for trees 12-inches and greater to be removed. Tree protection and removal plans will be reviewed and signed off by the City of Tigard Arborist. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal standards have not been met. CONDITIION: Provide a plan showing the size of all trees located on the site. If there are any trees that are 12-inches or greater, the applicant must provide a tree protection plan and mitigation plan for trees 12-inches and greater to be removed. Tree protection and removal plans will be reviewed and signed off by the City of Tigard Arborist. Vision Clearance: Chapter 18.795 applies to all development and requires that clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways and at the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The applicant has not proposed any structures or vegetation in the vision clearance area. FINDING: Because no structures are currently proposed in the vision clearance area and all future buildings will be reviewed for compliance during the building permit phase, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 13 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION D — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (SECTION 18.810): Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a major collector street to have a 60 to 80-foot right-of-way width and a 44-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Greenburg Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW in this area, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The roadway is fully improved as well, except for street trees. The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial driveway apron to serve a new private street. This is acceptable. The applicant shall also plant street trees along the remainder of the frontage. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030(F) states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The parcel immediately to the east of this site is a long flag lot, not owned by the applicant. The flag pole driveway serves approximately five existing dwellings to the north of this site. The applicant does not have access rights to that private driveway and was not able to obtain rights. Therefore, it is necessary that they be granted an access specific to this site. A public street is not necessary, as there are no connection possibilities to the north due to existing development of those parcels. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.K states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac. • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. There are no cul-de-sacs formed by this development. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 14 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030(G) requires all local streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Again, there are no opportunities for a public street connection to the north of this site, due to existing development patterns. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.M states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet), and: 1. Centerline radii of curves shall not be less than 700 feet on arterials, 500 feet on major collectors, 350 feet on minor collectors, or 100 feet on other streets; and 2. Streets intersecting with a minor collector or greater functional classification street, or streets intended to be posted with a stop sign or signalization, shall provide a landing averaging five percent or less. Landings are that portion of the street within 20 feet of the edge of the intersecting street at full improvement. The new private street will have a grade of less than 5%. Therefore, this criterion is met. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The new private street will provide sufficient access for all six lots. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.S states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. The proposed private street will only serve six dwellings, thereby meeting the standard. The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street will be owned and maintained by the properties that will be served by it/them. In addition, the applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) along with the final plat that will clarify how the private property owners are to maintain the private street. These CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final plat. The City's public improvement design standards require private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 15 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. There are no full blocks in the proposed development. The proposed subdivision will take access from SW Greenburg Road, which is a Major Collector. According to the Block Size standard, this section does not apply because the proposed subdivision takes access from a major collector. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. According to the plans, future street connection is not possible. However, sidewalks for bicycles and pedestrians are proposed to connect to SW Green burg Road. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot size of the R-12 zoning district is 3,050 square feet. However, there is no average lot width requirement for the R-12 zoning district. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. All lots in the proposed development have at least 25 feet of frontage onto the proposed Tract "A" serving the subdivision. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk on SW Greenburg Road. No other public sidewalk work is necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 16 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main in SW Greenburg Road that has sufficient capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the main line and extend a new public sewer main into the development inside of the private street. This scenario is acceptable. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this site is relatively flat, with no apparent upstream flows affecting the parcel. All onsite drainage will be accommodated within the project and conveyed to the storm system in SW Greenburg Road. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant is proposing to direct all onsite flows into a 24-inch detention pipe to meet CWS detention standards. The preliminary sizing calculations confirm that a 24-inch pipe will be sufficient to handle the flows from this site. The Public Works Department raised a concern with regard to the proposed connection to the public storm system in SW Greenburg Road. The applicants plan shows a potential connection to the existing catch basin in the street. This existing catch basin does not have a sump. The applicant will need to reconstruct the existing catch basin to provide a minimum 18-inch sump, in accordance with CWS standards. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 17 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Greenburg Road. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 85 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,338.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There is an existing public main line in SW Greenburg Road that the applicant intends to tap. A new public line is proposed to extend into the development inside of the private street. TVWD must review and approve the proposed construction plans for the new water line. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's engineer submitted a request to allow the fee in-lieu of water quality for this project. The site is relatively small and would require a swale length of at least 100 feet. There is only 80 feet of site length along the lower end of the site, and a swale would preclude effective use of that area. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 18 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Based upon exception criteria provided in the CWS standards, the applicant's request is granted. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay a fee in-lieu of water quality for at least the portion containing the private street. When building permits are applied for later, separate fees will be collected to account for each new home. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading plan will be reviewed and approved as a part of the public improvement construction plan review process. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $180.00 (6 lots X $30/address = $180.00). Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. E — IMPACT STUDY Section 18.390.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.050 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 , TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $189. The total TIF for a single-family dwelling is $2,260 per unit. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 19 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION The internal streets within the subdivision are needed to allow the subdivision to develop and the need for streets is created by the subdivision. Because the need for the internal streets is created by the development, the impact of the development is roughly proportional to the cost of dedication and construction of the internal streets. Upon completion of this development, the future builders of the residences will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $9,040 ($2,260 x 4 single-family dwelling units + 250.00 x 5 (minimum allowable street trees). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $28,250 ($9,040 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $9,040, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $19,210. Given that no dedication is required as part of this application, there is no need for further rough proportionality findings. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has objection to it. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Minimum fire access road is 15 feet. If proposed waterline and sanitary sewer are located in an easement, there may be a problem. • TVF&R must approve hydrant and fire access. The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • An arborist report is required since trees will be impacted by construction activities. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services of Washington County has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: STORM SEWER Engineer must verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties as required by Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 00-7. Extend storm services to north end of Tract A. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. SANITARY SEWER Extend public sanitary sewer to north end of Tract A. WATER QUALITY Due to the number of existing houses and the size of the development, payment of a fee-in-lieu of water quality may be allowed if approved by the City. EROSION CONTROL An Erosion control Permit is required. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 20 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1 . Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) 2. Since the proposed private access is only 24 feet wide, it will be required to designated as a fire lane for its entire length. 3. Signs shall read "NO PARKING — FIRE LANE — TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1) 4. Public streets shall have a maximum grade of 15%. Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10% with a maximum grade of 15% for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6) 5. Fire hydrants for single family dwellings, duplexes and sub-divisions, shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2) 6. The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be 1 ,000 gallons per minute. Fire flow documentation shall be provided. If the structure(s) is (are) 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A- III-A-1. (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5) SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 AND EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 12, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 21 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11, 2001. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. / %ii, �, _,/L,. September 27, 2001 PREPAR D : ': .7 ' M'4=�- ":-•ger DATE Assistant Planner ar , �- A r Ai September 27, 2001 APPROVED BY: Ric and Bewer :. DATE Planning Manaser i:\curpin\mathew\sub\sub2001-00005.doc NOTICE OF DECISION— PAGE 22 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012—ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION --7 41"11111"1 _ CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM � VICINITY MAP op ■ ii .8800 6 =-/ SU B200 I -00005 11! Q VAR200I -00012 KING' ■. or ESAU ESTATES ill 7Bili\ 1111 IMO Ell SUBDIVISION ` DAKOTA S II" VIII I1 1 . lit/ \ill 7.1. R■kill kiz ,- NI A rah a Illbm .:te4. LE►1 ,rye N — 1..11 L V° 4■ 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet _ ���75�1: psi •i.• -- ■ . ■ 1"=399 feet I A, hull G'y� 1 City of Tigard "loll e ve. , should W vardtad with the Dav IPZI t Se"ICas Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd•�� , Tigard,(0)OR 97223 `�i,P�H�� (503)639-4171 -_� http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 26,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR m o �f= N 0 7 O i N o so (1) - -- - -J l:p/ / I;-_ 0 SW 98TH AVENUE /', /' / ' f�l I;/ ' r iY i Zoli __ r 7,4., / / ; i c /i / / / ; // .a I/ / I. ' r �� O / / /4 2///� b 4 - L �� IV I / ';/1 I t I i lit ill d 1 1 hl iia �b 1 1 u / <-, AAA J al r 5 / / / t t a I t / / �� r----1 I t I / /: / P r J t L I j 1 p. 1 H/: ,-U y // l4p t I i '�'R ildL I ----J 5 /// /'ti :'VII ��_ i u , / / Q / / 5t q' ' cn / / /, ! I § r-7 L I 1 r/ i 3 1 I I 1 C I / l; N W // / �/ / :+ j".�.__ 'l_ i L_J LZ_r 1• tY(// r 1 1 r_J a 1,..=s) / I // f, L_� C O / ,` A 4V rn In c __ �/ / I ;' ;SW 97TH COURT _— `"°'°" SW 97TH COURT J I � ° i � i ;1Il9 11 ri � �r ildi$ : �1LI Li 171J ----`- m Z r / 7 1 /,! t ; H D I ! l , , r �� r_ 1 i y N / / I' i i i 1Rb r Z ,`1 _J pri c I / / ; J cj / ! ;/ vt o / /I , '',, /r Z N / / / ' ,/ l / A / ; I / / ' $ I / I I I 514 OOI- S linni UALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUi • SOUTH DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES • OPERATIONS • FIRE PREVENTION Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue August 27, 2001 Mathew Scheidegger, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Easu Estates Subdivision Dear Mathew, I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING"signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Since the proposed private access is only 24 feet wide, it will be required to designated as a fire lane for its entire length. 2. Signs shall read "NO PARKING — FIRE LANE—TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812"and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1) 3. Public streets shall have a maximum grade of 15%. Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10% with a maximum grade of 15% for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%)with the exception of crowning for water run-off. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6) 4. Fire hydrants for single family dwellings, duplexes and sub-divisions, shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2) 5. The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. Fire flow documentation shall be provided. If the structure(s) is (are) 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-1. (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5) Please contact me at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. Sincerely, Eric T. McMullen Eric T. McMullen Deputy Fire Marshal 7401 SW Washo Court, Suite 101 •Tualatin, Oregon 97062•Tel. (503)612-7000•Fax(503)612-7003•www.tvfr.com MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: September 20, 2001 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: Esau Estates Subdivision, SUB 2001-00005 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a major collector street to have a 60 to 80-foot right-of-way width and a 44-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Greenburg Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW in this area, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The roadway is fully improved as well, except for street trees. The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial driveway apron to serve a new private street. This is acceptable. The applicant shall also plant street trees along the remainder of the frontage. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030(F) states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 1 This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The parcel immediately to the east of this site is a long flag lot, not owned by the applicant. The flag pole driveway serves approximately five existing dwellings to the north of this site. The applicant does not have access rights to that private driveway and was not able to obtain rights. Therefore, it is necessary that they be granted an access specific to this site. A public street is not necessary, as there are no connection possibilities to the north due to existing development of those parcels. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.K states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac. • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. There are no cul-de-sacs formed by this development. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030(G) requires all local streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation. when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 2 constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Again, there are no opportunities for a public street connection to the north of this site, due to existing development patterns. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.M states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet), and: 1. Centerline radii of curves shall not be less than 700 feet on arterials, 500 feet on major collectors, 350 feet on minor collectors, or 100 feet on other streets; and 2. Streets intersecting with a minor collector or greater functional classification street, or streets intended to be posted with a stop sign or signalization, shall provide a landing averaging five percent or less. Landings are that portion of the street within 20 feet of the edge of the intersecting street at full improvement. The new private street will have a grade of less than 5%. Therefore, this criterion is met. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The new private street will provide sufficient access for all six lots. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.S states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 3 than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. The proposed private street will only serve six dwellings, thereby meeting the standard. The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street will be owned and maintained by the properties that will be served by it/them. In addition, the applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) along with the final plat that will clarify how the private property owners are to maintain the private street. These CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final plat. The City's public improvement design standards require private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 4 PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk on SW Greenburg Road. No other public sidewalk work is necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main in SW Greenburg Road that has sufficient capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the main line and extend a new public sewer main into the development inside of the private street. This scenario is acceptable. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 5 size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this site is relatively flat, with no apparent upstream flows affecting the parcel. All onsite drainage will be accommodated within the project and conveyed to the storm system in SW Greenburg Road. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant is proposing to direct all onsite flows into a 24-inch detention pipe to meet CWS detention standards. The preliminary sizing calculations confirm that a 24-inch pipe will be sufficient to handle the flows from this site. The Public Works Department raised a concern with regard to the proposed connection to the public storm system in SW Greenburg Road. The applicant's plan shows a potential connection to the existing catch basin in the street. This existing catch basin does not have a sump. The applicant will need to reconstruct the existing catch basin to provide a minimum 18-inch sump, in accordance with CWS standards. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 6 PLANNING Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. PLANNING Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. PLANNING Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 7 short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Greenburg Road. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 85 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 2,338.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There is an existing public main line in SW Greenburg Road that the applicant intends to tap. A new public line is proposed to extend into the development inside of the private street. TVWD must review and approve the proposed construction plans for the new water line. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's engineer submitted a request to allow the fee in-lieu of water quality for this project. The site is relatively small and would require a swale length of at least 100 feet. There is only 80 feet of site length along the lower end of the site, and a swale would preclude effective use of that area. Based upon exception criteria provided in the CWS standards, the applicant's request is granted. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay a fee in-lieu of water quality for at least the portion containing the private street. When ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 8 building permits are applied for later, separate fees will be collected to account for each new home. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading plan will be reviewed and approved as a part of the public improvement construction plan review process. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $180.00 (6 lots X $30/address = $180.00). Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 9 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the public and private improvements within the development and any other work in the public right-of-way. Eight (8) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private street shall meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 10 The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private stormwater detention facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) as a part of the public improvement plans. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$180.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). The final plat shall contain a restriction that states that Lots 1 and 6 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Greenburg Road. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private street will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and agreement for the proposed private street. The CC&R's shall obligate the private property owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of maintenance for the street. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) prior to approval of the final plat. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have formed and incorporated a homeowner's association. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Greenburg Road underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,338.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 11 The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private stormwater detention facility will be jointly owned and maintained by the developer or by the future homeowners within the subdivision. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and agreement for the proposed private stormwater detention facility. The CC&R's shall obligate the private property owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of maintenance for the facility. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) prior to approval of the final plat. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development, which includes the new public street and sidewalk areas. In addition, a standard value of 2,640 sf of hard surface is assessed to each individual lot. Payment of the fee can be split into two parts: 1) the portion based on surface area of new streets and sidewalk shall be paid by the applicant prior to approval of the final plat, 2) the portion assessed to each lot can be paid at the time building permits are issued for the individual lots. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) with surface area calculations for the streets and sidewalk in order for the fee under "1)" above to be calculated. The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 12 C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and require submittal and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the home building phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to issuance of building permits within the subdivision, the public improvements shall be deemed substantially complete by the City Engineer. Substantial completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for compliance, including franchise utilities, 2) all local residential streets have at least one lift of asphalt, 3) any off-site street and/or utility improvements are substantially completed, and 4) all street lights are installed and ready to be energized. (NOTE: model home permits may be issued by the City apart from this condition, and in accordance with the City's model home policy). IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHOULD AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTION S OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST: 18.430.080 Improvement Agreement: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 13 Before City approval is certified on the final plat, and before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shall: 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the subdivider. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. 18.430.090 Bond: As required by Section 18.430.080, the subdivider shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2. A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3. Cash. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. The subdivider shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. 18.430.100 Filing and Recording: Within 60 days of the City review and approval, the applicant shall submit the final plat to the County for signatures of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92. Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall submit to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 18.430.070 Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 14 Three copies of the subdivision plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. The subdivision plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS: Centerline Monumentation In accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 92.060, subsection (2), the centerline of all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be monumented before the City accepts a street improvement. The following centerline monuments shall be set: 1. All centerline-centerline intersection points; 2. All cul-de-sac center points; and 3. Curve points, beginning and ending points (PC's and PT's). All centerline monuments shall be set during the first lift of pavement. Monument Boxes Required Monument boxes conforming to City standards will be required around all centerline intersection points, cul-de-sac center points, and curve points. The tops of all monument boxes shall be set to finished pavement grade. 18.810 Street & Utility Improvement Standards: 18.810.120 Utilities All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface-mounted transformers, surface-mounted connection boxes, and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 15 temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required All improvements installed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.810.180. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. 18.810.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. 18.810.200 Engineer's Certification The land divider's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to the City acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. \\tig333\usr\depts\eng\brianr\com ments\sub\s ub2001-00005 doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SUB 2001-00005 Esau Estates Subdivision PAGE 16 Clem �.� �,- oUr Water eon�rnitment iscierVice cle,, S REc E IVE a PL AN N ING IVEMoRAND U1t j SEP 0 4 2001 Cl7 'OF TOAD DATE: ugus '1,2001 _FROG' IIMPIel alker, Cjean Water Services(formerly USA)Scheidegger, City of Tigard SjgJECT Ease Estates Subdivision STORM SEWER Y D eer must verify n°rth engn and Construction that public necessary.o f T act A�uctlOn Stan stogy sewer is during e 25-year,° s¢e i i St and a hydrological'Resolution ailable to u SANITARY T 24-hour storm a ve ysis of phlll adjacent properties ce No. T Yan anal 4 _ Extend SEWER nt the applicant is responsible the capacity tfo convey Extend storm service WATER Public sanitary sewer responsibl nv0 COI ,y hee is ice to D ER QUgLITY to north end of Tr gating the flo°�urxie Due to the apt A. number ° water quality of existing h ERASION CONTROL Y be allowed i faepprov the the o �Erosion T RaL approved by the C the d evejOPment C°n�°l Permit is required. ,payment o fa fee-in-lieu 155 N First First ven e, Suite 270• Fax.(50�Hillsboro Or.900 9c7/1e2a4nwaterservices.org W deanwarerserVlces.Or 9 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C,OF IGARD Community Development Shaping.71(Better Community DATE: August 16,2001 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Operations Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: [5031639-41/1/Fax: [5031684-1291 SUBDIVISION(SUM 2001-00005/ADJUSTMENT[VARI 2001-00012 EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. r. Written comments provided below: 4 t 8oitts( R el'o4.r 15 R_V>o•(aeir si Arc t: 6QM5 (n!(LL dE /inPP -e rye g'` edit/Sroc nodd r111 Ti GS, 1419-ri Sri (Tease provide the fodowing information)Name of Persontsl Commenting: I Phone Number: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFAGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: August 16,2001 TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division AUG 3 0 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311) CITY OF TiCAFifj Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SUBDIVISION(SUB)2001-00005/ADJUSTMENT(VAR)2001-00012 EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the fortowing information)Name of Persontsi Commenting: Pz i,i1 '7, 5/t.;-g- 6 � I Phone Number: � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IGARD Community cDevetopment Skaping Better Community DATE: August 16,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager AUG 31 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIC,ARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311) Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1291 SUBDIVISION(SUB)2001-00005/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2001-00012 EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments pr o vid—e d below: otki-a-C if-Arc Cohtb► T v o 0]20]6] R-SO l44'l6( e`B h4-1/E e /4,,x "_0, /' (Please provide tke fottowing information)Name of Personts]Commenting: I Phone Number: � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY of TIGARD Community Development Shaping letter Community DATE: August 16,2001 TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices 19044,,,,q RECEIVED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division �'�� AUG 2 0 2001 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheldegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 ` TUALATIN VALLEY Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [50316841291 1 WATER DISTRICT SUBDIVISION ISM 2001-00005/ADIUSTMENTMAID 2001-00012 ➢ EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot#5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1 S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on •- -•. - - - -. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BA - : AUGUST 30, 2001. Yo ay use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If y• • - - • - • - . . •nd by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLO1111R1N,I ITT MMs THA1 APPLY; We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. y, Written comments provided below: JAL-1,#a 77e-t:re,7/ed /2. Oii;r- b' /1 l / i•/ , - ..ev- /f . ..41 , 10)&ase provide the forfoiving information amlf- 01 Person s ommen mg: j< , ,� fie I Phone Number: g4-'025 ct � 100 1 9NIHaRNIDt1a TIMM, 9860 T6S £0S XVd C :60 NON TO/LZ/80 41,1. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: A August 16,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: 1� n Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division AUG 1 7 2001 CITY OF TiGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311) Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SUBDIVISION(SUB)2001-00005/ADJUSTMENT(VAR)2001-00012 EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLE)A.SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P(ease provide the foffxriving information)Name of Persontsl Commenting: Phone Number: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: August 16,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer AUG 1 7 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x311) Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: 15031 684-1291 SUBDIVISION[SUB)2001-00005/ADJUSTMENT[VAR)2001-00012 EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: j.LASE have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: I 0'lease provide thefolThwing information)Name of Persontsi Commenting: .4�e�f I Phone Number: +he � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C,OF I&ARD Community Deve(opment ShapingA Better Community DATE: August 16,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division AUG 1 6 2001 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3111 Phone: [5031639-41/1/Fax: [5031684-1291 SUBDIVISION(SUB)2001-00005/ADJUSTMENT(VAR)2001-00012 EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. • Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. 'X Written comments provided below: I) mrnitmurn FF/2e .4r &% ) /5 AG/0" - rF e- pillosgb wainaecive Som,,,,, S � Ate Cd3C44- IA) ftN F#1 1-t-M&it/i 449m inxlef kr A- pito .n . Z) —rvF-o. /Ate 4-I? lode m-e0024+-rr • b Pt,t.� �4 c assts I(Please provide the folfouring information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: KI�B te-r� Phone Number: - � � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF IGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: August 16,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3171 Phone: (503]639-4171/Fax: 15031 684-1291 SUBDIVISION(SUB)2001-00005/ADJUSTMENT(VAR]2001-00012 EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: AUGUST 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the fotrowing information)Name of Persons]Commenting: I Phone Number: • CITY . _ TIGARD REQUEST FOR CON_ ..:NTS • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: FILE NAME: �e ( �s'�RZ e CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ❑East DSouth DWest OProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES 1--"CONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs.L.POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer 1.-BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer L WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _ _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder _PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy.Property Manager 7 PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester PLANNER—TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM! SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST..ITUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* • TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* CLEAN WATER SERVICES Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE — Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces coordinator(cPA/zOA) Larry French(Comp Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY 11r King City,OR 97224 OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Punning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGNURB) CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy(IGAiJRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Do- Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Sr.Cartographer IcPNZC.Iras r. 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Jim Nims(ZCA)MS is Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(zcA)MS 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES —PORTLAND WESTERN RJR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 / SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann it Project is Wahin Y.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY —VERIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps E ofHalVN.ot99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Menlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 • INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 5-Jul-01) MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Shirley L. Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist / for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Bebw) ❑ NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Type;Kind of Notice) (File No./Name Reference) ;14 Day Comment Period) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ® NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION FOR: SUB2001-00005/ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) © City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council I I NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhIhIt"B", on September 27, 2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on September 27, 2001, postage prepaid. ya/A1/ .—, (Pe on that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3' cl day of O 743 10` , 204. ALIcuFOREcON SHERMAN S.CASPER NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON,, /%! Expires:Ex Commission op : ? 2663 2663/3 COMMISSION N�.323409 M >r1Y COMMISSION EXPIRES r,nAY 13,2003 LXII A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2001-00005 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2001-00012 CITY OFTIGARD 1 ( Community Development ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/12/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION CASE NOS.: Subdivision (SUB) SUB2001-00005 Variance (VAR) VAR2001-00012 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet of the common lot lines of lots 2-3, 4-5 and 5-6. APPLICANT: Bill McMonagle. OWNER: James & Audrey Castile Harris-McMonagle Associates 8100 SW Durham Road 12555 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. ZONE: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1 S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Not ci mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies ' • . Final Decision: • THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 12, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Agpeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. l THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11, 2001. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheideqger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Allill Atli .., iiI i i ii vIaNmr MAP III r Jh, V SUB2001-00005 -�°o. rl '�'I� VAR200100012 7 ■ r ESAU ESTATES ��-■ � ■ SUBDIVISION 7` •�.,11 ,111 �����11 fa 11 ■ ■e III Tr � ■ ��im-■. IIII• , ,. 1, N FA , Wail& ill - .um ti t t�����. - ®M _ %Li ow NIAIIIIIIIi■N_ $:4.i a ...... 4 1-- AIL „.....„, .?--■. „'.. MY" •1L. 001 C M�AKIMA 1• "- "+ --r1 -.t).42 I F!;H 7j 8; : . _.' o- t$-•`-4, r -r D ,%- .___-' ti C ,,, f� ; ; ; to.ft, -•-•-•:..:2----.: -__ . .4. ' --/tit 1 ,-_ �fws' Y� I1,rinj,, • v--:, m -9 __ I CITY OF TIGARD T SUB2001.00005NAR2001.00012 1 SITE PLAN N ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION (Map Is not to scale) 1S135CA-037U0 1S135CA-01702 le AASVE SANDRA J AND DAVID J DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 4829 SE 10TH TER 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE GRESHAM,OR 97080 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S 135CA-04000 1 S 135CA-01701 ALDERMAN SHAWN J& DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE ROCHE TORI L 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE 11345 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-00100 1 S 135CA-01704 ALVARADO MARTA M TRUSTEE DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11525 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135D B-05700 1 S 135CA-01703 BARNEY CHARLES R&CATHY L DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11450 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S1 35CA-02304 1S 135CA-01700 BOELLING KAREN E DAVIS STEVE&BARBARA JOHNSON ROBERT A 11300 SW 97TH CT 11500 SW GREENBURD RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02100 1 S 135CD-01702 CARMICHAEL THOMAS L DOBLIE JUDY K MAIMBERG TATIANA E 11640 SW 98TH AVE 11375 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01900 1 S 135CD-01500 CARROLL SONDRA DORSETT R CRAIG PO BOX 231025 11550 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01403 1 S 135C D-09200 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-01500 1S 13500-09000 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S135CA-02400 1S 135CD-09100 DAVIS MARGARET M TRUSTEE DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 11470 SW GREENBURG RD PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 is 135CD-00202 1 S 135CA-04600 DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN L GREELEY BARBARA J DRENNAN JOHN W 17190 S BECKMAN RD PO BOX 23603 OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135C0-08900 1 S 135CA-01100 DRENNAN JOHN W/DAVID A& GROW RUSSELL B&ALICE M JOAN 11455 SW 98TH PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S135CD-03601 1S135CD-00205 EATON RICHARD B&LINDA L HASTING THOMAS D 9625 SW LEWIS LN SHARON M TIGARD,OR 97223 9555 SW LEWIS LA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01600 1 S 135CD-03800 EMPKIE ROBERT JR HAZEL HASTING THOMAS D&SHARON M 6975 SW QUEEN LN 9555 SW LEWIS LN BEAVERTON,OR 97008 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DB-06000 1 S135CD-01703 ESTORJA MICHAEL T HELTZEL KENNETH L&HELEN M 11540 SW GREENBURG RD 5131 SW FREEMAN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135CA-04200 1 S 135CA-03400 F G F DEVELOPMENT INC HERNANDEZ JOSE R& 905 NW 20TH AVE JURADO MARIA S& PORTLAND,OR 97209 HERNANDEZ-J MAURILIO 11253 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01202 1 S 135CA-01901 F T A INC HERNANDEZ SUANNY& 4315 SW SELLING CT HERNANDEZ NOHEMY& PORTLAND,OR 97221 LORENZO-CARMONA LUIS 9640 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 151 35CA-04700 1S1 35CA-03100 FEENEY NANCY L JAMES FRED C 9771 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9545 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-03000 1 S 135CA-02302 FREUDENTHAL MICHAEL J& JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC LAURINDA L 738 NE DAVIS 9568 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST PORTLAND,OR 97332 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01700 1 S 135CA-02300 GETTY SHARON MARIE JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC 11630 SW 98TH 738 NE DAVIS TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97232 1 S 135CA-01 g00 1 S 135CD-00200 JAUCH ROGER P LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS JAUCH BRENT H 9575 SW LEWIS LN 10648 SW 41ST AVENUE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135CD-03500 1S 135CD-00201 JOY DANIEL J LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS 9655 SW LEWIS LN 9575 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-06800 1 S 135CD-00101 JUNGKIND SOPHIE TR LEWIS DAVID F&MARSHA F TRUSTE 8105 SW 68TH RD 9575 SW LEWIS LN PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135CD-03400 1S 135CD-00300 KNEELAND JAMES H&DEBORAH L LEWIS GARY M TRUSTEE 9690 SW LEWIS LN 3975 SW 97TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 1 S 135CA-03500 1 S 135CD-03600 KNOWLES TAMARA LEWIS SEAN M&JANEL K 11275 SW 95TH AVE 9595 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01902 1 S 135CA-04500 KOCIEMBA DIANE E LHOTKA GLEN M PO BOX 231021 11310 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135CA-08300 1 S 135CA-07200 LAMET DANIEL G LINDQUIST STUART H 11355 SW 97TH CT PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1S 13500-00790 1S 135CA-07300 LAMM FAMILY TRUST LINDQUIST STUART H 11520 SW 98TH AVE PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1S1 35CA-04400 1 S 135CA-07100 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE LINDQUIST STUART H 2206 NE 45TH PO BOX 42135 PORTLAND,OR 97213 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1S 135CA-04300 1S 135CA-01200 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE MACY RAYMON 2206 NE 45TH 11380 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND,OR 97213 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-00300 1 S 135CA-02200 MAHAR MARYLOU RODGERS TERRY 0 AND CHERYL 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY#129 do MURO DANIEL AND KELLY TIGARD,OR 97223 11405 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02303 1S 135CD-08800 MICKEL TOM 0&JUDITH A SATTERLUND SCOTT C&CYNTHIA K 10261 SW STUART CT PO BOX 230269 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-03600 1S 135C D-00900 MORADO SEBASTIAN&LUZ MARIA& SHARON DEVELOPMENT CO LLC MORADO JORGE L 5795 SW CRANBERRY CT 11289 SW 95TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-04100 1S1 35CA-08400 NGUYEN HUNG Q SLIMICK DANIEL&MARY 11355 SW 95TH AVE 11344 SW 97TH CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135CA-07400 , 1S135CA-03800 PARTIITON PLAT 1996-027 SPADY PATRICIA J OWNERS OF LOTS 1 2&3 11321 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 151 35CA-01001 1 S 135CA-04800 PERONA BERNARDITA J& SWARNER SANDI PERONA MOISES JR& 9775 SW NORTH DAKOTA PERONA ANITA JIMENEZ TIGARD,OR 97223 11365 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02301 1 S 135CA-01300 PETERSON GEORGIA V TABB JAMES R 11487 SW 95TH AVE 11400 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135CA-00902 1 S 135CA-00307 QUAIL COURT APARTMENTS LLC TAMARYN ASSOCIATES 5400 BAY CREEK DR PO BOX 1450 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 PACIFIC PALISADES,CA 90272 1 S 135CA-03900 15 135CA-02900 RASMUSSEN JAMES& TAYLOR GEORGENE KAREN 9580 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11343 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-00600 1 S 135CD-01001 REED KATHLEEN M TAYLOR ROBERT H&NANCY A 11435 SW GREENBURG RD 11585 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01 L03 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 1 Si 35C D-00700 TORLAND DORIS 11425 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135CD-01701 VEZEY CHERYL ANN 11650 SW 98TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01401 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1 S 135CA-03300 WHITE HEIDI A& KENNETH A 11231 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 135DB-05600 WINTHER STEPHEN&TERESA 11400 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01402 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 1 S 135CA-01400 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 CITY OF TIGARD EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Shirley L. Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist I for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Type/Kind of Notice) (File No./Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Period) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ® NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION FOR:[ 7 SUB2001-00005/ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) © City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: [ 7 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEIS] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B",on September 27, 2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on September 27, 2001, postage prepaid. >ii"i't CllUat (Pe on that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 day of ©e/a 6 tirpie , 200/,. NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON OFFICIAL SEAL -, sHERMAN S.GASPER 4: My Commission Expires: 3 Zpa,3 c;.. ✓ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' COMMISSION NO.323409 - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2001-00005 CITY OF TIGARD ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2001-00012 Communityweveropment Shaping Better Community ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION 120 DAYS = 12/12/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION CASE NOS.: Subdivision (SUB) SUB2001-00005 Variance (VAR) VAR2001-00012 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet of the common lot lines of lots 2-3, 4-5 and 5-6. APPLICANT: Bill McMonagle. OWNER: James & Audrey Castile Harris-McMonagle Associates 8100 SW Durham Road 12555 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. ZONE: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1 S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request and the associated variances subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI of this Decision. NOTICE OF DECISION— PAGE 1 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012—ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING GRADING, EXCAVATION, AND/OR FILL, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 317) for review and approval: 1. The applicant must develop lot #2 as an attached unit to the existing single-family home on lot#1, or remove the garage on lot #1 that would otherwise be in violation of the side yard setback requirement. 2. Provide a plan showing the building footprints for the proposed lots. If attached single-family dwellings are proposed, the applicant must provide buffering and screening according to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix). 3. Submit a plan showing street trees to planted along Tract "A" and the remainder of the site that fronts SW Greenburg Road according to the size and spacing standards of Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code. 4. Provide a plan showing the size of all trees located on the site. If there are any trees that are 12-inches or greater, the applicant must provide a tree protection plan and mitigation plan for trees 12-inches and greater to be removed. Tree protection and removal plans will be reviewed and signed off by the City of Tigard Arborist. 5. Pay Traffic Impact Fee of approximately $9,040.00. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the public and private improvements within the development and any other work in the public right-of-way. Eight (8) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 7. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 8. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 9. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private street shall meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street. 10. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 2 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION 11. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private stormwater detention facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) as a part of the public improvement plans. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $180.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). 13. The final plat shall contain a restriction that states that Lots 1 and 6 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Greenburg Road. 14. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private street will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it. 15. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and agreement for the proposed private street. The CC&R's shall obligate the private property owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of maintenance for the street. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) prior to approval of the final plat. 16. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have formed and incorporated a homeowner's association. 17. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Greenburg Road underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,338.00 and it shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat. 18. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private stormwater detention facility will be jointly owned and maintained by the developer or by the future homeowners within the subdivision. 19. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall prepare Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) for this project, to be recorded with the final plat, that clearly lays out a maintenance plan and agreement for the proposed private stormwater detention facility. The CC&R's shall obligate the private property owners within the subdivision to create a homeowner's association to ensure regulation of maintenance for the facility. The applicant shall submit a copy of the CC&R's to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) prior to approval of the final plat. 20. Prior to approval of the final lat, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development, which includes the new public street and sidewalk areas. In addition, a standard value of 2,640 sf of hard surface is assessed to each individual lot. Payment of the fee can be split into two parts: 1) the portion based on surface area of new streets and sidewalk shall be paid by the applicant prior to approval of the final plat, 2) the portion assessed to each lot can be paid at the time building permits are issued for the individual lots. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) with surface area calculations for the streets and sidewalk in order for the fee under "1)" above to be calculated. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 3 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION 21 . The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 22. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive a letter from the City Engineering Department indicating: 1) that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor, and 2) that the applicant has either completed any public improvements associated with the project, or has at least obtained the necessary public improvement permit from the City to complete the work. D. Once the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit two mylar copies of the final plat for City Engineer's signature. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 23. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 24. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and require submittal and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the home building phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits. 25. Prior to issuance of building permits within the subdivision, the public improvements shall be deemed substantially complete by the City Engineer. Substantial completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for compliance, including franchise utilities, 2) all local residential streets have at least one lift of asphalt, 3) any off-site street and/or utility improvements are substantially completed, and 4) all street lights are installed and ready to be energized. (NOTE: model home permits may be issued by the City apart from this condition, and in accordance with the City's model home policy). IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST: 18.430.080 Improvement Agreement: Before City approval is certified on the final plat, and before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Subdivider shall: 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the subdivider. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 4 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION • The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. 18.430.090 Bond: As required by Section 18.430.080, the subdivider shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2. A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3. Cash. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. The subdivider shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. 18.430.100 Filing and Recording: Within 60 days of the City review and approval, the applicant shall submit the final plat to the County for signatures of County officials as required by ORS Chapter 92. Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall submit to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. 18.430.070 Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: Three copies of the subdivision plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. The subdivision plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS: Centerline Monumentation In accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 92.060, subsection (2), the centerline of all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be monumented before the City accepts a street improvement. The following centerline monuments shall be set: 1. All centerline-centerline intersection points; 2. All cul-de-sac center points; and 3. Curve points, beginning and ending points (PC's and PT's). All centerline monuments shall be set during the first lift of pavement. Monument Boxes Required Monument boxes conforming to City standards will be required around all centerline intersection points, cul-de-sac center points, and curve points. The tops of all monument boxes shall be set to finished pavement grade. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 5 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION • 18.810 Street & Utility Improvement Standards: 18.810.120 Utilities All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface-mounted transformers, surface-mounted connection boxes, and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required All improvements installed by the subdivider shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.810.180. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. 18.810.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. 18.810.200 Engineer's Certification The land divider's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to the City acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records and found no other land-use cases associated with the parcels of the subdivision. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There are single-family homes on two of the lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard setback from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet of the common lot lines of lots 2-3, 4-5 and 5-6. Vicinity Information: The proposed development is north of SW Greenburg Road and west of SW 97th Court. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 6 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION • SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Subdivision — General Provisions 18.430.020 Subdivision — (General Provisions) B. Subdivision — Approval Criteria C. Applicable Development Code Sections 18.370 (Variances and Adjustments) 18.510 (Residential zoning districts) 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation) 18.715 Density) 18.745 Landscaping and screening) 18.765 (Off-street parking and loading requirements) 18.790 (Tree removal) 18.795 (Vision clearance) D. Street and Utility Improvement 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) E. Impact Study (18.390) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of these Specific Development Standard Code Chapters: 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.740 (Historic Overlay), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations), 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.760 (Nonconforming situations), 18.775 (Sensitive Lands), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.797 (Water Resources Overlay District), and 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A — SUBDIVISION GENERAL PROVISIONS: Future Re-Division. When subdividing tracts into large lots, the Approval Authority shall require that the lots be of such size and shape as to facilitate future re-division in accordance with the requirements of the zoning district and this title. The minimum lot size for the R-12 zoning district is 3,050 square feet. Proposed lot sizes do not exceed 5,104 square feet. Therefore, none of the lots are large enough to divide in the future. Lot Size Averaging: Section 18.430.020.D states Lot size may be averaged to allow lots less than the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying zoning district as long as the average lot area for all lots is not less than allowed by the underlying zoning district. No lot created under this provision shall be less than 80% of the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying zoning district. The proposed lot sizes are between 3,019 and 5,104 square feet. Therefore, the average lot size is approximately 3,779 square feet. According to the criterion above, no lot created under the lot size averaging rovision shall be less than 80% of the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying zoning district. Eighty percent of the minimum lot size (3,050 square feet) is 2,440 square feet. The smallest of the lots is 3,019 square feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 7 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Phased Development: The Approval Authority may approve a time schedule for developing a subdivision in phases, but in no case shall the actual construction time period for any phase be greater than two years without reapplying for a preliminary plat; The criteria for approving a phased site development review proposal are: a.)The public facilities shall be scheduled to be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase to ensure provision of public facilities prior to building occupancy; b.) The development and occupancy of any phase shall not be dependent on the use of temporary public facilities: For purposes of this subsection, a temporary public facility is an interim facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard; and The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required as a part of the approval of the preliminary plat. The application for phased development approval shall be reviewed concurrently with the preliminary plat application and the decision may be appealed in the same manner as the preliminary plat. The applicant has not proposed a phased development, therefore, this standard does not apply. B — SUBDIVISION APPROVAL CRITERIA Approval Standards — Preliminary Plat: The proposed preliminary plat complies with the applicable zoning ordinance and other applicable ordinances and regulations. Compliance with the specific regulations and standards of the zoning ordinance will be addressed further within this decision. The proposed plat name must not be duplicative and must otherwise satisfy the provisions of ORS Chapter 92. The applicant has provided evidence that the proposed subdivision name has been reserved with Washington County, thus insuring that the name is not duplicative. The Streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions and maps of major partitions or subdivisions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects unless the City determines it is in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern. Street layout is discussed in more detail, and conditioned if necessary, under the 18.810 (Street and Utility) section of this decision. An explanation has been provided for all common improvements. The applicant has provided an explanation for all common improvements as required and, therefore, satisfied this criterion. Specific details of the proposed improvements are discussed later in this decision under the Street and Utility Improvement Standards section 18.810. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the proposal meets, the preliminary plat approval standards for subdivisions. C — APPLICABLE TIGARD DEVELOMENT CODE SECTIONS Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Section 18.370.020.C.1.a states there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property which are unusual and peculiar to the land as compared to other lands similarly situated; There are two (2) parcels involved in this subdivision, each containing a single-family home. Minimum density requirements dictate that the proposed subdivision contain at least six (6) lots. As proposed, that would be two (2) with the existing homes and 4 new buildable lots. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 8 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION The adjustment is necessary for the proper design or function of the subdivision; The proposed subdivision will retain the two (2) existing houses. In so doing, the minimum density requirement and dimensional and lot area requirements for the R-12 zone are such that a reduction in side yards as described above is necessary. The granting of the adjustment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of property; and Granting the requested adjustments will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of surrounding properties. The development is as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. Single-family homes will be constructed with a 1-foot reduction in side yard requirements. This reduction will still provide for adequate air, light and safety areas around the homes, the major rationale for side yards. The adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary hardship which would result from strict compliane with the regulations of this title. It is not economically feasible to demolish the two existing houses and redesign the subdivision. They are structurally sound and have many years of residential use remaining. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Special adjustment criteria have been met. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510) Lists the description of the residential Zoning District. The site is located in the R-12: Medium-Density residential zoning district. The R-12 zoning district has the following dimensional requirements: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-7 Minimum Lot Size 3,050 sq. ft. Detached unit Duplexes - Attached unit [1] Average Minimum Lot Width None Maximum Lot Coverage 80% [2] Minimum Setbacks Front yard 15 ft. Side facing street on corner & through lots 10 ft. Side yard 5 ft. Rear yard 15 ft. Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 30 ft. Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. Maximum Height 35 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement 20% [11 Single-family attached residential units permitted at one dwelling per lot with no more that five attached units in one grouping. The proposed lots range in size from 3,019 square feet to 5,104 square feet. The applicant has applied for and received approval to reduce the setbacks from 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2- 3, 4-5 and 5-6. The applicant is also proposing to develop lot 2 as an attached unit to the pre-existing single-family home on lot #1. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to develop lot #2 as an attached unit to the existing single-family home on lot #1, or remove the garage on lot #1 that would otherwise be in violation of the side yard setback requirement. NOTICE OF DECISION— PAGE 9 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012—ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the residential zoning district dimensional standards have not been satisfied. CONDITION: The applicant must develop lot #2 as an attached unit to the existing single-family home on lot #1, or remove the garage on lot #1 that would otherwise be in violation of the side yard setback requirement. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Chapter 18.705 establishes standards and regulations for safe and efficient vehicle access and egress on a site and for general circulation within the site. Table 18.705.1 states that the minimum vehicular access and egress for single-family dwelling units on individual lots shall be one, 10-foot paved driveway within a 15-foot-wide accessway. The minimum access width for 3-6 dwelling units is 20 feet with 20 feet of pavement. The access and egress into the site itself is discussed later in this decision under the Street and Utility Standards section of this decision (18.810). Access to individual lots will be reviewed for compliance during the building permit phase. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Scaled site plans have been submitted that indicate how the requirements of access, egress, and circulation are met. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Joint access is proposed over a tract of land for lots 1-6. The joint access labeled "Tract A" on the site plan is a separate piece of land, outside the boundaries of all proposed parcels. Therefore, this standard has been met. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Based on the plans submitted, all of the proposed lots will take access from `Tract A" which will connect to SW Greenburg Road, a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 10 OF 22 SUB2001-00005/VAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. Driveways and curb cuts will be reviewed for compliance during the building permit phase. Inadequate or hazardous access: Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director, the access proposed would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety and general welfare. Based on the plan submitted by the applicant, Staff can not foresee any hazardous conditions associated with the proposed access. Therefore, this criterion is met. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. The proposed single-family lots will have access, via a private street (Tract A), which connects to SW Greenburg Road. Therefore, this standard has been met. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. The proposed subdivision is for single-family homes. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum access requirements for residential use: Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2; Vehicular access to individual lots will be reviewed during the building permit phase. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Vehicular access to multi-family structures shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance or the ground floor landing of a stairway, ramp, or elevator leading to the dwelling units; No multi-family structures are proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform fire Code; Vehicular access to individual lots will be reviewed during the building permit phase. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Section 18.705.030.H.4 states that Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet or a hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. The private street is approximately 135 feet in length, therefore, no turn around for fire apparatus is required. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 11 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been satisfied. Density Computations and Limitations: Chapter 18.715 implements the Comprehensive Plan by establishing the criteria for determining the number of dwelling units permitted. The number of allowable dwelling units is based on the net development area. The net area is the remaining parcel area after exclusion of sensitive lands and land dedicated for public roads or parks. The net area is then divided by the minimum lot size permitted by the zoning district to determine the number of dwelling units that may be developed on a site. Based on the formulas in Chapter 18.715 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code, the maximum and minimum number of units permitted on the site are based on the net developable area, subtracting sensitive land areas, land dedicated to public parks, land dedicated for public right-of-way and land for private streets from the total site area. Of the total site area (26,264 square feet), 3,585 square feet is subtracted for the proposed roadway Tract "A" and 8,573 square feet for pre-existing structures on proposed lots #1 and #5. No wetlands or land dedicated to the public for parks is associated with this development. The site lies adjacent to SW Greenburg Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. The roadway is fully improved, therefore, no right-of-way dedication is required. This results in a net developable area of 14,106 square feet. Therefore, the maximum number of dwelling units permitted on this site is 4 and the minimum number 3. The applicant is proposing to keep the 2-existing homes and create 4 additional lots. Therefore, this section is satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Density standards have been satisfied. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Chapter 18.745 contains landscaping provisions for new development. Section 18.745.100 requires that street trees be planted in conjunction with all development that fronts a street or driveway more than 100 feet long. A proposed planting list must be submitted for review by the Director since certain trees can damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or cause personal injury. Section 18.745.040.0 contains specific standards for spacing of street trees as follows: • Small or narrow stature trees (under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching) shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; • Medium sized trees (25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching) shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; and • Large trees (over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching) shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The applicant proposes to provide a private street that is approximately 135 feet in length and has 165 feet of frontage along SW Greenburg Road. However, the applicant has not proposed to plant trees along the proposed drive or the frontage along SW Greenburg Road. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to submit a plan showing street trees to planted along Tract "A" and the remainder of the site that fronts SW Greenburg Road according to the size and spacing standards of Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code. Section 18.745.050 contains the provisions and requirements for buffering and screening. The Buffering and Screening Matrix (Section 18.745.1) does not require buffering or screening when a single-family detached residential use is proposed adjacent to existing detached single-family dwellings. However, buffering and screening does apply to attached single-family dwellings when they are adjacent to detached single-family dwellings. The applicant has indicated that the existing home on lot #1 will be attached to the proposed single-family home on lot #2. The proposed Esau Estates is separated from the adjoining property to the east by SW 97th Court. Therefore, no buffering or screening will be required for lot #1 and #2. However, Staff cannot determine if attached units will be developed on any of the other 4 lots. The applicant will be required to provide a plan showing building footprints for the undeveloped lots. If attached single-family dwellings are proposed, the applicant must provide buffering and screening according to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix). NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 12 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that all of the landscaping and screening standards have been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Provide a plan showing the building footprints for the proposed lots. If attached single-family dwellings are proposed, the applicant must provide buffering and screening according to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix). Submit a plan showing street trees to planted along Tract "A" and the remainder of the site that fronts SW Greenburg Road according to the size and spacing standards of Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements (18.765): Chapter 18.765, Table 18.765.2 requires that single-family residences be provided with one (1) off-street parking space for each dwelling unit. Compliance with this standard will be enforced during the building permit review process. Since the Code requires 20 feet from the property line to the face of a garage, this will insure that at least one car can park off of the street, outside of any garage. FINDING: Because each individual home will be reviewed for compliance with this standard during the building permit phase and it is feasible that this standard will be met by providing driveways and garages, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal: Chapter 18.790 requires mitigation of trees over 12" diameter at breast height (dbh) removed as part of the development of the site. The applicant states in the narrative that there are no trees with a diameter of 12-inches within the building footprints of the proposed lots. The site plan shows that there are trees located on the site, however the applicant has not provided the diameter inches of the trees on the site and whether or not they will be removed. The site plan does not show proposed building footprints but does show trees to be located within the estimated driveway location on proposed lot #4. Therefore, the applicant must provide a plan showing the size of all trees located on the site. If there are any trees that are 12-inches or greater, the applicant must provide a tree protection plan and mitigation plan for trees 12-inches and greater to be removed. Tree protection and removal plans will be reviewed and signed off by the City of Tigard Arborist. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal standards have not been met. CONDITIION: Provide a plan showing the size of all trees located on the site. If there are any trees that are 12-inches or greater, the applicant must provide a tree protection plan and mitigation plan for trees 12-inches and greater to be removed. Tree protection and removal plans will be reviewed and signed off by the City of Tigard Arborist. Vision Clearance: Chapter 18.795 applies to all development and requires that clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways and at the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The applicant has not proposed any structures or vegetation in the vision clearance area. FINDING: Because no structures are currently proposed in the vision clearance area and all future buildings will be reviewed for compliance during the building permit phase, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 13 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION • D — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (SECTION 18.810): Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a major collector street to have a 60 to 80-foot right-of-way width and a 44-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Greenburg Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW in this area, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The roadway is fully improved as well, except for street trees. The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial driveway apron to serve a new private street. This is acceptable. The applicant shall also plant street trees along the remainder of the frontage. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030(F) states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. The parcel immediately to the east of this site is a long flag lot, not owned by the applicant. The flag pole driveway serves approximately five existing dwellings to the north of this site. The applicant does not have access rights to that private driveway and was not able to obtain rights. Therefore, it is necessary that they be granted an access specific to this site. A public street is not necessary, as there are no connection possibilities to the north due to existing development of those parcels. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.K states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured along the centerline of the roadway from the near side of the intersecting street to the farthest point of the cul-de-sac. • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. There are no cul-de-sacs formed by this development. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 14 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030(G) requires all local streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Again, there are no opportunities for a public street connection to the north of this site, due to existing development patterns. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.M states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet), and: 1. Centerline radii of curves shall not be less than 700 feet on arterials, 500 feet on major collectors, 350 feet on minor collectors, or 100 feet on other streets; and 2. Streets intersecting with a minor collector or greater functional classification street, or streets intended to be posted with a stop sign or signalization, shall provide a landing averaging five percent or less. Landings are that portion of the street within 20 feet of the edge of the intersecting street at full improvement. The new private street will have a grade of less than 5%. Therefore, this criterion is met. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.P states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a nonaccess reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The new private street will provide sufficient access for all six lots. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.S states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. The proposed private street will only serve six dwellings, thereby meeting the standard. The applicant shall place a statement on the face of the final plat indicating the private street will be owned and maintained by the properties that will be served by it/them. In addition, the applicant shall record Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) along with the final plat that will clarify how the private property owners are to maintain the private street. These CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final plat. The City's public improvement design standards require private streets to have a pavement section equal to a public local street. The applicant will need to provide this type of pavement section. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 15 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. There are no full blocks in the proposed development. The proposed subdivision will take access from SW Greenburg Road, which is a Major Collector. According to the Block Size standard, this section does not apply because the proposed subdivision takes access from a major collector. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. According to the plans, future street connection is not possible. However, sidewalks for bicycles and pedestrians are proposed to connect to SW Green burg Road. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. The minimum lot size of the R-12 zoning district is 3,050 square feet. However, there is no average lot width requirement for the R-12 zoning district. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. All lots in the proposed development have at least 25 feet of frontage onto the proposed Tract "A" serving the subdivision. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing sidewalk on SW Greenburg Road. No other public sidewalk work is necessary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 16 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main in SW Greenburg Road that has sufficient capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the main line and extend a new public sewer main into the development inside of the private street. This scenario is acceptable. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this site is relatively flat, with no apparent upstream flows affecting the parcel. All onsite drainage will be accommodated within the project and conveyed to the storm system in SW Greenburg Road. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant is proposing to direct all onsite flows into a 24-inch detention pipe to meet CWS detention standards. The preliminary sizing calculations confirm that a 24-inch pipe will be sufficient to handle the flows from this site. The Public Works Department raised a concern with regard to the proposed connection to the public storm system in SW Greenburg Road. The applicants plan shows a potential connection to the existing catch basin in the street. This existing catch basin does not have a sump. The applicant will need to reconstruct the existing catch basin to provide a minimum 18-inch sump, in accordance with CWS standards. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 17 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Greenburg Road. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 85 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,338.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There is an existing public main line in SW Greenburg Road that the applicant intends to tap. A new public line is proposed to extend into the development inside of the private street. TVWD must review and approve the proposed construction plans for the new water line. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's engineer submitted a request to allow the fee in-lieu of water quality for this project. The site is relatively small and would require a swale length of at least 100 feet. There is only 80 feet of site length along the lower end of the site, and a swale would preclude effective use of that area. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 18 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Based upon exception criteria provided in the CWS standards, the applicant's request is granted. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall pay a fee in-lieu of water quality for at least the portion containing the private street. When building permits are applied for later, separate fees will be collected to account for each new home. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading plan will be reviewed and approved as a part of the public improvement construction plan review process. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $180.00 (6 lots X $30/address = $180.00). Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. E — IMPACT STUDY Section 18.390.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.050 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 , TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $189. The total TIF for a single-family dwelling is $2,260 per unit. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 19 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION The internal streets within the subdivision are needed to allow the subdivision to develop and the need for streets is created by the subdivision. Because the need for the internal streets is created by the development, the impact of the development is roughly proportional to the cost of dedication and construction of the internal streets. Upon completion of this development, the future builders of the residences will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $9,040 ($2,260 x 4 single-family dwelling units + 250.00 x 5 (minimum allowable street trees). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $28,250 ($9,040 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $9,040, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $19,210. Given that no dedication is required as part of this application, there is no need for further rough proportionality findings. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has objection to it. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Minimum fire access road is 15 feet. If proposed waterline and sanitary sewer are located in an easement, there may be a problem. • TVF&R must approve hydrant and fire access. The City of Tigard Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • An arborist report is required since trees will be impacted by construction activities. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services of Washington County has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: STORM SEWER Engineer must verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties as required by Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 00-7. Extend storm services to north end of Tract A. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. SANITARY SEWER Extend public sanitary sewer to north end of Tract A. WATER QUALITY Due to the number of existing houses and the size of the development, payment of a fee-in-lieu of water quality may be allowed if approved by the City. EROSION CONTROL An Erosion control Permit is required. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 20 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1 . Where fire apparatus roadways are less than 28 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are more than 28 feet wide but less than 32 feet wide, "NO PARKING" signs shall be installed on one side of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Where fire apparatus roadways are 32 feet wide or more, parking is not restricted. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) 2. Since the proposed private access is only 24 feet wide, it will be required to designated as a fire lane for its entire length. 3. Signs shall read "NO PARKING — FIRE LANE — TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810 - 98.812" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.1) 4. Public streets shall have a maximum grade of 15%. Private fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10% with a maximum grade of 15% for lengths of no more than 200 feet. Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6) 5. Fire hydrants for single family dwellings, duplexes and sub-divisions, shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant at an intersection as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.2) 6. The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be 1 ,000 gallons per minute. Fire flow documentation shall be provided. If the structure(s) is (are) 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A- III-A-1 . (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5) SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X _ The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 AND EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 12, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 21 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012-ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11, 2001. I Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . ... ii�' September 27, 2001 i, �, � ,. �.� ..� PREPAR D : ': l ryiFf t4 . -..er DATE Assistant Planner C . ,� September 27, 2001 APPROVED BY: Ric and Bewers o DATE Planning Manager i:\curpin\mathew\sublsub2001-00005.doc NOTICE OF DECISION- PAGE 22 OF 22 SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012—ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Z CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM I J . � \ VICINITY MAP I' „ . ._____ 1 ®00006 re W SU B200 I -00005 VAR2001 -00012 lop, • = _ 111: - , -- - E SA U ESTATE S \ 7 T SUBDIVISION •RTH - DAKOTA■ liii A orlillrpi. jjhmlrr. IMEM 11.1 111114111 P **,g 111%NI] . 111 . Am i 61 IIIII Na :I ����_ 3 - GRE6vat,,i,, . - "'Ali Itwirlk411. o LEWIS L m la N ��..... ti r P pc��si —I ■ '�, 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet EllAllinik �•ELA , I I LN 1=399 feet _lid �— 'r� - TAN ELA C j <c__ Alk LI111/114111111Mik:C `ilTi�.1 _ City of Tigard i4/1 ■■,• F' Information on this map is for general location only and ■_" I CJ) should be verified vith the Development Services Division. "�� , So ' lb �` 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 mix 11 � ad.. �.� IIME — (503)C tigard 639-4171 --. F' ��...�_ http l/waN.ci.tiga .ocus Community Development Plot date: Sep 26,2001:C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR r 1 r r Z r -- te I � 1 1 1 I Li i ti` i i I iife _ 'y RT=1 E AQ 1 1 l::■Q° I P1 1 8 I lJ rl S I I ^.1- __-ts-Jl EASEMENT � ��r l Z I 1 r -7- i r i I 1 1.1 I I 0 I o '7-U rJ A cU Li I I DO I�- 1. 1 IJ I! I: 1 r-J �;°q '--^- /- _ LSME[li _J -lY b i 7 / kifrw< J 6Lx �\.1 ,...., • c_,,,, ( `J.: eaeeeE �. I I tin'---../^, /1 / c ..,,...., 4 V 11/ ,,,. .,. .... :i .... ....,.., ... _ , ,/ ,,., _.,, ,..., ` '-"..................7._ HOUSE !RO M7M111).__ 1 Lil `\/ ' Off /k d �w = ��� ir-,_�' `�`�s��`_� air n"�.» 11 `0 I ,,—'--.7 -781//t CR i �l --∎ IF - 4o A LOT 4 1`� ` 'a te _ �� �---J LOT 5 �� _ �� MAP 15,1 354D i r`_ �_ `` r— II II I -. _ ~_ f CITY OF TIGARD f SUB2001.00005NAR2001-00012 • CITY OF TIGARD SITE PLAN N ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION • (Map is not to scale) - 6 Mina Bill McMonagle Harris-McMonagle Associates SUB2001-00005/VAR2001-00012 12555 SW Hall Boulevard ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION Tigard, OR 97223 Spencer H. Vail 4505 NE 24th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 James & Audrey Castile 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 411,•• AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIOARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunslord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofTigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SUB2001-00005/VAR2001-00012 - EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION ElAMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on August 16,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on August16,2001, postage prepaid. / L," (Person that Prepare. Noti •) STA`ItE of oGow ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard C,.`J Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of OC, , 2001 . OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-0REGON • COMMISSION NO.32657g MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2009 4/ ' I i ' ' ' I I I '1'. My Commission Ex:ires: EXHIBIT A • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SUBDIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community Deveropment Shaping 4 Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: August 16, 2001 FILE NUMBERS: SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2001-00005 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2001-00012 FILE NAME: EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 30, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 20, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled Your Right to Provide Written Comments." VII 11111 Ag f,Iiv of FIGARO „MI6' VICINITY MAP,411 ilio, ,1 Ili �'� SUB2001-00005 __�_ •_�m. ■Ilik VAR2001-00012 ■ �1�.m, EASU ESTATES .. : _ PIE: EE... MEIN ■■�� ■ I 70141ELRE.� 11 11��1■ C SUBDIVISION Ik e E 5 I ■r.J■:■ ■■ is film IP' I, INNA•billit ;!.,1,1 1 T�I.ltla--.._■,iii . ,�. ,1 1.�l. 1 �.Il■■= - - , N !EL IMRE =MD i• el■ � —■ ■■�► 1■ 11 ii. ...m. .S/►,■i:•. At ir,ires.„, Wog ea me 1 or 6.1•11111■1 wqir .��m�.� \ �`�� riili ice∎ L^".,..._ L EXIII 1 S 135CA-03700 1 S 135CA-01702 AASVE SANDRA J AND DAVID J DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 4829 SE 10TH TER 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE GRESHAM,OR 97080 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135CA-04000 1S135CA-01701 ALDERMAN SHAWN J& DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE ROCHE TORI L 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE 11345 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135C D-00100 1 S 135CA-01704 ALVARADO MARTA M TRUSTEE DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11525 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S135DB-05700 1S135CA-01703 BARNEY CHARLES R&CATHY L DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11450 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S1 35CA-02304 1 S 135CA-01700 BOELLING KAREN E DAVIS STEVE&BARBARA JOHNSON ROBERT A 11300 SW 97TH CT 11500 SW GREENBURD RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02100 1S 135CD-01702 CARMICHAEL THOMAS L DOBLIE JUDY K MAIMBERG TATIANA E 11640 SW 98TH AVE 11375 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01900 1S 135CD-01500 CARROLL SONDRA DORSETT R CRAIG PO BOX 231025 11550 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01403 1 S 135C D-09200 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-01500 1 S 135CD-09000 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-02400 1 S 135CD-09100 DAVIS MARGARET M TRUSTEE DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 11470 SW GREENBURG RD PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CD-00202 1 S 135CA-04600 DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN L GREELEY BARBARA J DRENNAN JOHN W 17190 S BECKMAN RD PO BOX 23603 OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135C D-08900 1 S 135CA-01100 DRENNAN JOHN W/DAVID A& GROW RUSSELL B&ALICE M JOAN 11455 SW 98TH PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CD-03601 1S 135CD-00205 EATON RICHARD B&LINDA L HASTING THOMAS D 9625 SW LEWIS LN SHARON M TIGARD,OR 97223 9555 SW LEWIS LA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01600 1 S 135CD-03800 EMPKIE ROBERT JR HAZEL HASTING THOMAS D&SHARON M 6975 SW QUEEN LN 9555 SW LEWIS LN BEAVERTON,OR 97008 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135D B-06000 15135C D-01703 ESTORJA MICHAEL T HELTZEL KENNETH L&HELEN M 11540 SW GREENBURG RD 5131 SW FREEMAN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135CA-04200 1 S 135CA-03400 F G F DEVELOPMENT INC HERNANDEZ JOSE R& 905 NW 20TH AVE JURADO MARIA S& PORTLAND,OR 97209 HERNANDEZ-J MAURILIO 11253 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01202 1 S 135CA-01901 F T A INC HERNANDEZ SUANNY& 4315 SW SELLING CT HERNANDEZ NOHEMY& PORTLAND,OR 97221 LORENZO-CARMONA LUIS 9640 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135CA-04700 1 S 135CA-03100 FEENEY NANCY L JAMES FRED C 9771 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9545 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135CA-03000 1 S 135CA-02302 FREUDENTHAL MICHAEL J& JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC LAURINDA L 738 NE DAVIS 9568 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST PORTLAND,OR 97332 TIGARD,OR 97223 is 135CD-01700 1 S 135CA-02300 GETTY SHARON MARIE JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC 11630 SW 98TH 738 NE DAVIS TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97232 1 S i 35CA-01800 1S 135CD-00200 JAUCH ROGER P LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS JAUCH BRENT H 9575 SW LEWIS LN 10648 SW 41ST AVENUE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 iS 135CD-03500 1S 135CD-00201 JOY DANIEL J LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS 9655 SW LEWIS LN 9575 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-06800 1 S 135CD-00101 JUNGKIND SOPHIE TR LEWIS DAVID F&MARSHA F TRUSTE 8105 SW 68TH RD 9575 SW LEWIS LN PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-03400 1 S 135CD-00300 KNEELAND JAMES H&DEBORAH L LEWIS GARY M TRUSTEE 9690 SW LEWIS LN 3975 SW 97TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 151 35CA-03500 1 S 135CD-03600 KNOWLES TAMARA LEWIS SEAN M&JANEL K 11275 SW 95TH AVE 9595 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01902 1 S135CA-04500 KOCIEMBA DIANE E LHOTKA GLEN M PO BOX 231021 11310 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-08300 1 S 135CA-07200 LAMET DANIEL G LINDQUIST STUART H 11355 SW 97TH CT PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1 S 135CD-00790 1 S 135CA-07300 LAMM FAMILY TRUST LINDQUIST STUART H 11520 SW 98TH AVE PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1 S 135CA-04400 1 S 135CA-07100 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE LINDQUIST STUART H 2206 NE 45TH PO BOX 42135 PORTLAND,OR 97213 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1S 135CA-04300 1 S 135CA-01200 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE MACY RAYMON 2206 NE 45TH 11380 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND,OR 97213 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135C D-00500 is 135CA-02200 MAHAR MARYLOU RODGERS TERRY 0 AND CHERYL 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY#129 do MURO DANIEL AND KELLY TIGARD,OR 97223 11405 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02303 1 S 135CD-08800 MICKEL TOM 0&JUDITH A SATTERLUND SCOTT C&CYNTHIA K 10261 SW STUART CT PO BOX 230269 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-03600 1 S 135CD-00900 MORADO SEBASTIAN&LUZ MARIA& SHARON DEVELOPMENT CO LLC MORADO JORGE L 5795 SW CRANBERRY CT 11289 SW 95TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-04100 1 S 135CA-08400 NGUYEN HUNG 0 SLIMICK DANIEL&MARY 11355 SW 95TH AVE 11344 SW 97TH CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135CA-07400 , 1S1 35CA-03800 PARTIITON PLAT 1996-027 SPADY PATRICIA J OWNERS OF LOTS 1 2&3 11321 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01001 1 S 135CA-04800 PERONA BERNARDITA J& SWARNER SANDI PERONA MOISES JR& 9775 SW NORTH DAKOTA PERONA ANITA JIMENEZ TIGARD,OR 97223 11365 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02301 1 S 135CA-01300 PETERSON GEORGIA V TABB JAMES R 11487 SW 95TH AVE 11400 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135CA-00902 1 S 135CA-00307 QUAIL COURT APARTMENTS LLC TAMARYN ASSOCIATES 5400 BAY CREEK DR PO BOX 1450 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 PACIFIC PALISADES,CA 90272 1 S 135CA-03900 1 S 135CA-02900 RASMUSSEN JAMES& TAYLOR GEORGENE KAREN 9580 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11343 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135C D-00600 1 S 13SCD-01001 REED KATHLEEN M TAYLOR ROBERT H&NANCY A 11435 SW GREENBURG RD 11585 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01203 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-00700 TORLAND DORIS 11425 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135CD-01701 VEZEY CHERYL ANN 11650 SW 98TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01401 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1S135CA-03300 WHITE HEIDI A& KENNETH A 11231 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135DB-05600 WINTHER STEPHEN&TERESA 11400 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01402 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 1 S 135CA-01400 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 BILL MCMONAGLE HARRIS-MCMONAGLE ASSOCIATES 12555 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 SPENCER H. VAIL 4505 NE 24TH AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97211 • CITY OF TIGARD EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE is\curpin\setup\Iabels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 J�� CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 1 AREA NOTIFIED ,: (500') lir ."BNB•O W 1. Q i11 FOR: Spencer Vail Q - RE: 1S135CA, 1500/1403 i_wCL: w o cc W > ,c 1 110101•1411111 Property owner information Iv NORTH DAKOTA — Is valid for 3 months from 01E13 In 101k iiiilqtiFilllr.,.... Eiruj the date printed on this map. ,B171WN• r , 7 Sit, ' ,!■ "1N«BNM ■ 111•LINIC Ma 11130CAMN 5.:-C«]7U m«eNTNB = • "�L''�_ MO«BBON . N 1fuOBBBNM 1B17Se.BNBI ell Nr 0I WM CNN N N7 c tBO6CBBBBBB Z t7psc"']" "im' bmceem 4.0"..]""175".". \`� 0 100 200 300 -400 Feet > 6gBCBB«« 13.0/4/ Q ,<,neN>s« 1'=297 feet 1$19SC$S"BI "NSEBN1B1 \ 16135eBN]N 1B77BCBBMBI 1117SCB«BN 1C775EBB1B« 1 76CBNB01 1707CBBB• 111mmus immune "�CBNxB7'--' '1 g . IB176eNTIBBiBpSCNrn CBBrn2 v . .\. \ CT "°"'"�' LEWIS LN City of Tigard J I MI I = Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd \ Tigard,OR 97223 ,. (503)639-4171 SW PIHAS http://whwci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 1,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR • 1S135CA-03700 1S135CA-01702 AASVE SANDRA J AND DAVID J DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 4829 SE 10TH TER 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE GRESHAM, OR 97080 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135CA-04000 1S135CA-01701 ALDERMAN SHAWN J & DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE ROCHE TORI L 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE 11345 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S135CD-00100 1S135CA-01704 ALVARADO MARTA M TRUSTEE DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11525 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135D B-05700 1 S 135CA-01703 BARNEY CHARLES R&CATHY L DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11450 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135CA-02304 1S135CA-01700 BOELLING KAREN E DAVIS STEVE&BARBARA JOHNSON ROBERT A 11300 SW 97TH CT 11500 SW GREENBURD RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02100 1 S 135CD-01702 CARMICHAEL THOMAS L DOBLIE JUDY K MAIMBERG TATIANA E 11640 SW 98TH AVE 11375 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 15135CA-01900 1S135CD-01500 CARROLL SONDRA DORSETT R CRAIG PO BOX 231025 11550 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01403 1 S 135CD-09200 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 15135CA-01500 1S135CD-09000 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-02400 1 S 135C D-09100 DAVIS MARGARET M TRUSTEE DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 11470 SW GREENBURG RD PO BOX 23603 TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CD-00202 1 S 135CA-04600 DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN L GREELEY BARBARA J DRENNAN JOHN W 17190 S BECKMAN RD PO BOX 23603 OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CD-08900 1 S 135CA-01100 DRENNAN JOHN W/DAVID A& GROW RUSSELL B&ALICE M JOAN 11455 SW 98TH PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97281 1 S 135CD-03601 1S1 35CD-00205 EATON RICHARD B&LINDA L HASTING THOMAS D 9625 SW LEWIS LN SHARON M TIGARD, OR 97223 9555 SW LEWIS LA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01600 1 S 135CD-03800 EMPKIE ROBERT JR HAZEL HASTING THOMAS D&SHARON M 6975 SW QUEEN LN 9555 SW LEWIS LN BEAVERTON,OR 97008 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135D B-06000 1 S 135CD-01703 ESTORJA MICHAEL T HELTZEL KENNETH L&HELEN M 11540 SW GREENBURG RD 5131 SW FREEMAN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135CA-04200 1 S 135CA-03400 F G F DEVELOPMENT INC HERNANDEZ JOSE R& 905 NW 20TH AVE JURADO MARIA S& PORTLAND,OR 97209 HERNANDEZ-J MAURILIO 11253 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01202 1 S 135CA-01901 F T A INC HERNANDEZ SUANNY& 4315 SW SELLING CT HERNANDEZ NOHEMY& PORTLAND,OR 97221 LORENZO-CARMONA LUIS 9640 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-04700 1 S 135CA-03100 FEENEY NANCY L JAMES FRED C 9771 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9545 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-03000 1 S 135CA-02302 FREUDENTHAL MICHAEL J& JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC LAURINDA L 738 NE DAVIS 9568 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST PORTLAND,OR 97332 TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01700 1S1 35CA-02300 GETTY SHARON MARIE JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC 11630 SW 98TH 738 NE DAVIS TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97232 1 S 135CA-01800 1 S 135CD-00200 JAUCH ROGER P LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS JAUCH BRENT H 9575 SW LEWIS LN 10648 SW 41ST AVENUE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135CD-03500 1 S 135C D-00201 JOY DANIEL J LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS 9655 SW LEWIS LN 9575 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-06800 1 S 135CD-00101 JUNGKIND SOPHIE TR LEWIS DAVID F&MARSHA F TRUSTE 8105 SW 68TH RD 9575 SW LEWIS LN PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135C D-03400 1 S 135CD-00300 KNEELAND JAMES H&DEBORAH L LEWIS GARY M TRUSTEE 9690 SW LEWIS LN 3975 SW 97TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 1S1 35CA-03500 1 S 135CD-03600 KNOWLES TAMARA LEWIS SEAN M&JANEL K 11275 SW 95TH AVE 9595 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135CA-01902 1S135CA-04500 KOCIEMBA DIANE E LHOTKA GLEN M PO BOX 231021 11310 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-08300 1 S 135CA-07200 LAMET DANIEL G LINDQUIST STUART H 11355 SW 97TH CT PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1 S 135CD-00790 1 S 135CA-07300 LAMM FAMILY TRUST LINDQUIST STUART H 11520 SW 98TH AVE PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1 S 135CA-04400 1 S 135CA-07100 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE LINDQUIST STUART H 2206 NE 45TH PO BOX 42135 PORTLAND,OR 97213 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1S1 35CA-04300 1 S 135CA-01200 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE MACY RAYMON 2206 NE 45TH 11380 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND,OR 97213 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135C D-00500 1 S 135CA-02200 MAHAR MARYLOU RODGERS TERRY 0 AND CHERYL 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY#129 do MURO DANIEL AND KELLY TIGARD, OR 97223 11405 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02303 1 S 135CD-08800 MICKEL TOM 0&JUDITH A SATTERLUND SCOTT C&CYNTHIA K 10261 SW STUART CT PO BOX 230269 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-03600 1 S 135C D-00900 MORADO SEBASTIAN&LUZ MARIA& SHARON DEVELOPMENT CO LLC MORADO JORGE L 5795 SW CRANBERRY CT 11289 SW 95TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S 135CA-04100 1 S 135CA-08400 NGUYEN HUNG Q SLIMICK DANIEL&MARY 11355 SW 95TH AVE 11344 SW 97TH CT TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-07400 1 S 135CA-03800 PARTIITON PLAT 1996-027 SPADY PATRICIA J OWNERS OF LOTS 1 2&3 11321 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01001 1 S 135CA-04800 PERONA BERNARDITA J& SWARNER SANDI PERONA MOISES JR& 9775 SW NORTH DAKOTA PERONA ANITA JIMENEZ TIGARD,OR 97223 11365 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02301 1 S 135CA-01300 PETERSON GEORGIA V TABB JAMES R 11487 SW 95TH AVE 11400 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135CA-00902 1S1 35CA-00307 QUAIL COURT APARTMENTS LLC TAMARYN ASSOCIATES 5400 BAY CREEK DR PO BOX 1450 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 PACIFIC PALISADES,CA 90272 1S 135CA-03900 1S1 35CA-02900 RASMUSSEN JAMES& TAYLOR GEORGENE KAREN 9580 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11343 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S 135C D-00600 1 S 135CD-01001 REED KATHLEEN M TAYLOR ROBERT H&NANCY A 11435 SW GREENBURG RD 11585 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CA-01203 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD, OR 97223 1S135CD-00700 TORLAND DORIS 11425 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S135CD-01701 VEZEY CHERYL ANN 11650 SW 98TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01401 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1 S 135CA-03300 WHITE HEIDI A& KENNETH A 11231 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DB-05600 WINTHER STEPHEN&TERESA 11400 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CA-01402 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 1 S 135CA-01400 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 • CITY OF TIGARD EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Naomi Gallucci 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Receipt #: 27200100000000002257 ��.► Date: 06/01/2001 TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due MISC Miscellaneous Fees&Charges-2.5000 @$1.00 100-0000-451000 $2.50 RECEXP Recovered Expenditures(labels)- 11.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-479000 $11.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Cash SPENCER VAIL $13.50 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $13.50 J CITY of TIGARD OEOORAPMIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED 1 (500') FOR: Spencer Vail Mega -- 1312 5 66 0 03 0 7 _w RE: 15135CA, 01500&01403 > Q _ i W 1_ u,— i 0 t- W g' 1 > 1m�caoae0 —�512501M106 ,_, inane 100 '217f .41 , 1313500 0 43 3 0 _ Property owner information 1(7 NORTH DAKOTA — is valid for 3 months from 1111 the date printed on this map. 1e170C0011D111170000i104 1S175C6019 �'HOOM�100 1113501111120 t ---151e5C60�f103 17eCA0190M 1S175GD1e00 l 15175CA0 a , — iSi35C005800 15135010110 1 85G03400 0 _ 15135 CA01900 500041 OD • 'MIL w 131S5CA0 "' 1S 8500041 .„„e> ) .\3600 ash 35C604o'y, 161350001200 15135 0001400 }S185C00ae0�75115060130 I `,85000930 .10305030210� • �.1a50*010o u k. �1�� 111170665133 en; utasoeoseoo 1 85010220 1 7400 \` ;.. = 1tImG11e02 35000 ' i5C60n00 ` 3 13135g0e8)D • t9lascooD7le �~ N 151350008900 1 3500090'0 750e0e0, w rn D 1511500008001 3500091 0 c 151750000950 Z 15135C000190 1ep5CD01500 1113500003OG ill o \C�A i^��j 0 100 200 300 400 Feet Q 131310001500 'V�j' T r"=297 feet .00002,0 35000 01 • 31350001001 .00 15175 0001800 157.50007801 15135000 P 1S 3050003 00 1511500101 50000201 1:,� T 1 3sceono ula5coon12 �� City of Tigard 1 3sceono3 15vsco5ndl LEWIS LN ill = Information on this map a for general location ony and lir-- ~ should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd 1 iik ,,,, Tigard,OR 97223 - .. (503)639-4171 hltp:,,www.ci.tigard.orms Community Develnoment Plot date: Feb 26,2001;C:\nagic\MAGIC03.APR 1S135CA-03700 ' 1S135CA-01702 AASVE SANDRA J AND DAVID J DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 4829 SE 10TH TER 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE GRESHAM,OR 97080 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135CA-04000 1S135CA-01701 ALDERMAN SHAWN J& DAVI ET S&KAREN M BOROSKE ROCHE TORI L 4348 SW ASHOUGA AVE 11345 SW 95TH AVE PORT ND, R 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CD-00100 1S135C -01704 ALVARADO MARTA M TRUSTEE DAVIS TE S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11525 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW SHOUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT D, R 97201 19135M-05700 1 S 135CA-01703 BARNEY CHARLES R&CATHY L DAVIS ETE S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11450 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW ASHOUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT D, R 97201 1 S 135CA-02304 1 S 135CA-01700 BOELLING KAREN E DAVIS STEVE&BARBARA JOHNSON ROBERT A 11300 SW 97TH CT 11500 SW GREENBURD RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02100 1 S 135CD-01702 CARMICHAEL THOMAS L DOBLIE JUDY K MAIMBERG TATIANA E 11640 SW 98TH AVE 11375 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01900 1 S 135CD-01500 CARROLL SONDRA DORSETT R CRAIG PO BOX 231025 11550 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01403 1 S 135CD-09200 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S13 A-0 0 1S13 CD-09 0 CASTI JAMES&AUDREY DRE DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 S URHAM RD PO BO 23603 TIGA D, 97224 TIGA , R 97281 1 S 135CA-02400 1 S 135 D 100 DAVIS MARGARET M TRUSTEE DREN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 11470 SW GREENBURG RD PO BOX 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97281 15135C0-00202 1 S 135CA-04600 DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN L GREELEY BARBARA J DRENNAN JOHN W 17190 S BECKMAN RD PO BOX 23603 OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CD-08900 1 S 135CA-01100 DRENNAN JOHN W/DAVID A& GROW RUSSELL B&ALICE M JOAN 11455 SW 98TH PO BOX 23603 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CD-03601 1S 135CD-00205 EATON RICHARD B&LINDA L HASTING THOMAS D 9625 SW LEWIS LN SHARON M TIGARD,OR 97223 9555 SW LEWIS LA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01600 1 S 135CD-03800 EMPKIE ROBERT JR HAZEL HASTING THOMAS D&SHARON M 6975 SW QUEEN LN 9555 SW LEWIS LN BEAVERTON,OR 97008 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DB-06000 1 S 135CD-01703 ESTORJA MICHAEL T HELTZEL KENNETH L&HELEN M 11540 SW GREENBURG RD 5131 SW FREEMAN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135CA-04200 1S 135CA-03400 F G F DEVELOPMENT INC HERNANDEZ JOSE R& 905 NW 20TH AVE JURADO MARIA S& PORTLAND,OR 97209 HERNANDEZ-J MAURILIO 11253 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01202 1 S 135CA-01901 F T A INC HERNANDEZ SUANNY& 4315 SW SELLING CT HERNANDEZ NOHEMY& PORTLAND,OR 97221 LORENZO-CARMONA LUIS 9640 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-04700 1S 135CA-03100 FEENEY NANCY L JAMES FRED C 9771 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9545 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-03000 1 S 135CA-02302 FREUDENTHAL MICHAEL J& JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC LAURINDA L 738 NE DAVIS 9568 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST PORTLAND,OR 97332 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CD-01700 1S13 A-0 0 GETTY SHARON MARIE JANI Y UTH PROGRAMS INC 11630 SW 98TH 738 N AVIS TIGARD,OR 97223 POR IUD,OR 97232 1S135CA-01800 • 1S135CD-00200 JAUCH ROGER P LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS JAUCH BRENT H 9575 SW LEWIS LN 10648 SW 41ST AVENUE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135CD-03500 1S135 '-00201 JOY DANIEL J LEWIS 0'VIP E&MARSHA E TRS 9655 SW LEWIS LN 9575 SW .' IS LN TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT • D,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-06800 1 S 135CD-00101 JUNGKIND SOPHIE TR LEWIS DAVID F&MARSHA F TRUSTE 8105 SW 68TH RD 9575 SW LEWIS LN PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135C0-03400 1 S 135CD-00300 KNEELAND JAMES H&DEBORAH L LEWIS GARY M TRUSTEE 9690 SW LEWIS LN 3975 SW 97TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 1S 135CA-03500 1S 135CD-03600 KNOWLES TAMARA LEWIS SEAN M&JANEL K 11275 SW 95TH AVE 9595 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01902 1S 135CA-04500 KOCIEMBA DIANE E LHOTKA GLEN M PO BOX 231021 11310 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-08300 1S 135CA-07200 LAMET DANIEL G LINDQUIST STUART H 11355 SW 97TH CT PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1 S 135CD-00790 1 S 135CA-0 LAMM FAMILY TRUST LINDA T STUART H 11520 SW 98TH AVE PO B 135 TIGARD,OR 97223 POR LAN OR 97242 1S135CA-04400 1S135 A-07 0 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE LINDA I STUART H 2206 NE 45TH PO BO 2135 PORTLAND,OR 97213 POR, ,OR 97242 1S135CA-0 0 1S135CA-01200 LEE PAU TRUSTEE MACY RAYMON 2206 N 5TH 11380 SW GREENBURG RD PORT OR 97213 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CD-00500 • 1 S 1 35CD-00600 MAHAR MARYLOU REED KATHLEEN M 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY#129 11435 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1 35CA-03300 1 S 135CA-02200 MCCOY HEIDI A AND RODGERS TERRY 0 AND CHERYL WHITE KENNETH A do MURO DANIEL AND KELLY 11231 SW 95TH 11405 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1 35CA-02303 1 S 1 35CD-08800 MICKEL TOM 0&JUDITH A SATTERLUND SCOTT C&CYNTHIA K 10261 SW STUART CT PO BOX 230269 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135CA-03600 1 S 135CD-00900 MORADO SEBASTIAN&LUZ MARIA& SHARON DEVELOPMENT CO LLC MORADO JORGE L 5795 SW CRANBERRY CT 11289 SW 95TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1 35CA-041 00 1 S 1 35CA-08400 NGUYEN HUNG Q SLIMICK DANIEL&MARY 11355 SW 95TH AVE 11355 SW 97TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CA 400 1S135CA-03800 PA TI ON PLAT 1996-027 SPADY PATRICIA J OW S OF LOTS 1 2&3 11321 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01001 1 S 135CA-04800 PERONA BERNARDITA J& SWARNER SANDI PERONA MOISES JR& 9775 SW NORTH DAKOTA PERONA ANITA JIMENEZ TIGARD,OR 97223 11365 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02301 1S 135CA-01300 PETERSON GEORGIA V TABB JAMES R 11487 SW 95TH AVE 11400 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1 35CA-00902 1 S 1 35CA-00307 QUAIL COURT APARTMENTS LLC TAMARYN ASSOCIATES 5400 BAY CREEK DR PO BOX 1450 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 PACIFIC PALISADES,CA 90272 1 S 135CA-03900 1 S 135CA-02900 RASMUSSEN JAMES& TAYLOR GEORGENE KAREN 9580 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11343 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1S135CD-01001 • TAYLOR ROBERT H&NANCY A 11585 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CA-0 03 TIGA CITY OF 1312 W HALL TIGA D, R 97223 1 S 135CD-00700 TORLAND DORIS 11425 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01701 VEZEY CHERYL ANN 11650 SW 98TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01401 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1 S 135DB-05600 WINTHER STEPHEN&TERESA 11400 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01400 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 1 S 13 A-0 402 WON RMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NTH POR AND, R 97212 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECEIVED c■ri - o; t PLANNING DIVISION 1� CITY OFnGARD 3 125 SW HALL BOULEVARD FEB 2 700 F Community�DecrThpmem Shaping. Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 91223 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297(Ann: Patty or Shirtey/Planning) R QUES1F f fiR 5OO- UO[k .I. R 4Y' c ' , MAILING: LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 15134A8, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): I s ( 37(5(7 1.4 n 3 INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: 3 (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: S �� f` .�L • PHONE: :5-6 3 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. cost Description: $1 1 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. * EXAMPLE * * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4 sheets of labels x $2/sheet = $8.00 x _2_sets = S16.00 sheet(s) of labels x S2/sheet = S /U x 3 sets = _2_ sheets of labels x S2/sheet for CIT area x 1 sets = S 4.00 sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = S4 x sets = S `{ GENGRATF IIST = SI I nn GENERATE LIST = $ILO( TOTAL = S31.00 TOTAL = arelc Receipt #: 27200100000000000931 Date: 03106/2001 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due RECEXP Recovered Expenditures(labels)-45.0000 @$1.00 100-0000-479000 $45.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check SPENCER VAIL 0 1297 $45.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $45.00 APPLICANT MATERIALS SUBDIVISION TYPE II 4 or TYPE III w/PD APPLICATION 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-72.7 CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: iNOWA GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Property Address/Location(s): MI3CC3 /2.g - / 7 2 Z 3 t\ Case No.(s):SLI Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): /'s�/„35-6.51 T/2- i4'O5 / r� Other Case No.(s):V 4 ° _iIL .. ( .qb Receipt No.: 110 .j d (1:6172.0 a /ot- -101 Application Accepted B : Aamaf Site Size: ✓ C6. 'a jto //�� Date: � 6 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*1/4T/4 ( '4 S//Z,6- Ada ress:C�/0 P444444"/ Phone:632-139S- Date Determined Complete: `ti City: /4 Z 7' - Zip: .72 29" Rev.8/4/2000 i:\curpin\masters\revised\subapp.doc Applicant*: ©�//I�"6�0oA24 — Address:/2$73—.<4V/ i//i Phone: , 9 3"$3 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS 702-3 (Note: applications will not be accepted City: 77-5/5- c ' - Zip: without the required submittal elements) * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant [Y Application Form must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written C Owner's Signature/Written Authorization authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Title Transfer Instrument or Deed must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes PROPOSAL SUMMARY Wa. Co. Subdivision Name Approval Site/Plot Plan The owners of record of the subject property request Subdivision (#of copies based on pre-app check list) approval to divide a: ��ite/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") r-t A..,_I,......t St.-.t..mcnt 9'E //S'c - parcel into lots between (#of copies based on pre-app check list) 30 <q and S-(6-{ square feet in size. [J/ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) a USA Service Provider Letter Ni(gR4- 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped (provide any additional information here) #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City 0 Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits & Notes ET Filing Fee (Preliminary Plat)....$2,125.00 (+$10 Per Lot) (Final Plat) $ 295.00 * Add 20% PD Fee Urban: See Wa. Co. Fee Schedule etf +enc:6- _ 3f 183 1 . .,. , List any VARIANCE OR OTHE'. AND USE ACTIONS to be considered as t of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. I` DATED this // _. day of ,de yLL- ,20 0/ Q Ji ... .< 1af er's Signature Owner's Signature \f\,,. ....\,....3\s ....,,,... .... \....._ )` Owner's Signatu a Owner's Signature ADJUSTMENT TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: tA, ER DATE OF PRE-APP.: • I . a GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location(s): //Wj //4/5-6) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): e".05/ 77Z-- /.5'0 cJ Site Size: c7' 6/ .4{ - Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*77W T Case No.(s): f �a i 0I 3 Address:/lV Phone: 639/7 > Other Case No.(ss):— 60 I* City: Z7' -`z' - Zip: 972 2i_o `�Ar A licant': `" o Receipt No.: _• Address:/2,$�✓-5 � /Ath _Phone:C39`3y5 Application Acc pted y: deg City: �%G`/SID �2 Zip: 972 '3 Date: (Q G U 1 • * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Date Determined To Be Complete: authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Comp Plan/Zone Designation: PROPOSAL SUMMARY ,- la •The owners of record of the subject property request permission for an CIT Area: 6 Administrative Adjustment to the following provision(s) of the Recording Date and Number: Community Development Code (please circle one only): :Development Adjustment $100 Rev.6/20/2000 i:\curpin\masters\adjustmt.mst :Special Adjustments: • Adjustments to a Subdivision $100 • Reduction of Minimum Residential Density $100 • Landscaping Adjustments—Existing/New Street Trees $100 • Parking Adjustments—Reduction in Stacking Lane Length $100 • Wireless Communication Facility Adjustments—Distance From Another Tower $100 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Please state the reason for the Adjustment equest: ' ' tom A/A'P`T`��` r ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Application Form Er Owner's Signature/Written Authorization [/] Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Site/Plot Plan (6 copies) [i Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") dApplicant's Statement (Addressing Criteria Under Section 1370.020) ' n Filing Fee $100.00 o° \ 1 APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. • DATED this // day of vn e-- ,21V d/ ,er's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signatu Owner's Signature 2 Receipt #: 27200100000000002600 Date: 06/25/2001 TIDEMARK a may COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due SUB2001 00005 [LANDUS]APPLICATION FEE 100-0000-438000 $2,185.00 VAR2001-00012 [LANDUS]SUBDIV VARIANCE 100-0000-438000 $20.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check JAMES W.CASTILE 0 106 0 $2,205.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $2,205.00 James W Castile 8100 SW Durham Road 106 Portland,OR 97224-7315 2®O/ Pay to the order n I O� $ ,, 205 CO DOLLARS Payable Through Bank of America,N.A.101 South Marengo Avenue,Pasadena,CA 91122 20485445-4: : : .032-4071 Bankof America. ���� STA t OREGON tt SS 1 FiECbRDING REQUESTED BY County of Washington FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF OREGON I, Jer /'� ry e< •n +�lf Hof Assess ment and : •- • i �o County GRANTOR'S NAME rti that Clerk for i 'b A . r F„ r'b fY. John Hopkins the wit " 4. �'� �a}•. . = eceived•o i. R• $J f said ` and re p) g �. _ Kam;' ,� ; GRANTEE'S NAME county ..,� I; , \ , .r p it James Castile and Audrey Castile * ,V,"! fi ', r a of a/ (�. '� irector of SEND TAX STATEMENTS To: �41rY` 4'" ••r axation,Ex- Mr. and Mrs. James Castile � C lerk 8100 SW Durham Rd. Portland, OR 97224 Doc 2000078134 Rect: 263870 112.00 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: 09/27/2000 10: 34: 16am Mr. and Mrs. James Castile 8100 SW Durham Rd. Portland, OR 97224 SP•C A:OV ' S N 0• • O.1 • IS STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED John C. Hopkins, Conservator of the Estate of JoAnn Roberts, a protected person, Grantor, conveys and warrants to James Castile and Audrey Castile, Husband and Wife, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear +f encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, VV SEE EXHIBIT ONE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF L'U Subject to and excepting: 1 . A LIEN FOR 2000/2001 TAXES NOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE. 2. RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES IN 1' AND TO ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF S.W. GREENBURG ROAD. t i� THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS $85,000.00 (See ORS 93.030, DATED: September 25, 2000 l v� / CAS :€56' Ae4 Jilin C. Hopkins, Conservator of e Estate of JoA n Roberts, a protected person 4y WASHINGTON COUNTY +mop REAL IWORERTY TRANSFER STATE OF OREGON TAX " s 33,00 0`1 .027.0° 1^ COUNTY OF 1 In01(i yt_ FEE PAID DATE This instrument was acknowledged before me on 30PIeMIOCA 2-(Z). 2-000 by \jnn C . 1 I()-)t(tln5, (c y,Tt(lV OFFICIAL SEAL KARLEEN M HUQOIN8 "5 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON BM B FOR OREGUN < � `7,' COMMISSION NO.A305881 MY COMMIS ION EXPIRES: 161 ly)U MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT 20,2001 FORD-313 (Rev 2/96) STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED I . 4).N.. • Escr'w_No. 10-18036-M1-28 itle Order No. 00018036 EXHIBIT ONE The following described real property in GREENBURG HEIGHTS, a duly recorded subdivision in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon: Beginning at the Southwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to Anton Mack, et ux, by deed recorded September 28, 1943, in Book 211, Page 508, Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records, which point is in the centerline of S.W. Greenburg Road; thence North 71 °23' West 72.93 feet, along the center of said road, to a point; thence North 05°27' East 30.81 feet to an iron rod on the Northerly line of said road; thence, continuing North 05°27' East 138.53 feet to an iron rod; thence South 82°25'45" East 54.37 feet to an iron rod on the West line of said Mack tract; thence South 00°16' West 153.10 feet, along said West line, to an iron rod on the Northerly line of S.W. Greenburg Road; thence continuing South 00°16' West 31 .61 feet to the place of beginning. s I. p 'AFTER-RELORDING RETURN TO: STATE OF OII tGON 1 SS I, •m&s Castile County of Washington J .drey Castile I, Jerry: ‘;• n n: •,r of Assess- D��D� s� n / ment and - • • : d-, • h•'o County l�_r h Q✓v% I(� . Clerk for : •• •,• :• <• rtify that - / n n the wit '�i : ,• ∎ , t� : 3a eceived I l a/�Gf / DEC 7 7a a y and re 9. :.? .j�„\, ,r ,.1.•,g, •f said y county * , T'i .,,, . :1 1 Until a change is requested all tax */ `. ` 4, •ktu,� Ia : �.,/o- statements shall be sent to the following q(,,\'• ,. .{',, .. ,, address: --s):,J rry;- Hanes-:Director of An, - axatlon,Ex- SCI wi to 9i 91� a-� ".:oil 0 tv clerk Doc : 2000083206 Rect: 264880 187.00 Escrow No: 5500-32099-KH 10/12/2000 04: 33: 30pm Order No: 218201 WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) JULIA L. EGGERT rantor, conveys and warrants to JAMES and AUDREY CASTILE, as tenants by the entirety Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein: (Continued) 4"1•..,,, VJASH;NCTON COUNTY �.', ;,:`1 RE L PHOPEii V TRANSFER TAX '' -la-oo " �_$---1112°-- to ;:;(.;1' FEEE PAID DATE This instrument will not allow use of the property described in this instrument in violation of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. ENCUMBRANCES: 1. Taxes for the fiscal year 2000-2001, a lien but not yet payable. 2. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers including the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency. (Continued) The true consideration for this conveyance is $160, 000.00 Dated ( A RA 3, if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by orde of its board of directors. AfI4��./ ---_,API 4 R . L. Eggert') STATE OF OREGON, County of YVgcYI 1 hq-"O v. ) ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on 00± i- 0be - .3 , p�o+�o •-ly .1 LL lia 1-- E.g.9 e c-' -- — :his instrument was acknowledged before me on , by as of gy).€4.4 C i Notary Public for Ore #:t",,. OFFICIAL'SEAL 1/ /q-0 )-- r KAREN HAYS My commission expires: ' , NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON � ;;1 COMMISSION NO.317471 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 18,2002 1 — )...4,6 ,order No: 218201 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beginning at an iron pipe on the North line of Lot 7 of GREENBERG HEIGHTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, South 0°02' West 298 feet and South 89°34' West 20 .00 feet from the initial point of said subdivision; thence South 0°02' West along the West line of a 20 foot wide roadway as shown on the plat of said GREENBURG HEIGHTS 382 .4 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Lot 7 in the center of the County road, from which point an iron pipe bears North 0°02' East 31 .7 feet; thence North 71°06' West along the South line of said Lot 7 and in the center of said road 127.35 feet to a point from which an iron pipe bears North 0°02' East 31 .7 feet; thence North 0°02' East parallel with the East line of said Lot 7 a distance of 340.2 feet to an iron pipe on the North line thereof; thence North 89°34' East along said North line 120.55 feet to the place of beginning. EXCEPTING that portion thereof conveyed to William F. Furber, et ux, by Deed recorded August 19, 1948, in Book 288, Page 121, Deed Records described as follows : Beginning at an iron pipe on the North line of Lot 7 of GREENBERG HEIGHTS, a duly recorded plat in the John L. Hicklin Donation Land Claim No. 54 in Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon which beginning point bears South 0°02' West 298 feet and South 89°34' West 20 feet from the initial point of said subdivision; thence from said beginning point South 0°02' West along the West line of a 20 foot wide roadway as shown on the plat of said GREENBERG HEIGHTS 180.6 feet to a point; thence North 89°34' West 120.55 feet to a point; thence North 0°02' East parallel with the East line of said Lot 7 a distance of 180.6 feet to an iron pipe on the North line thereof; thence North 89°34' East along said North line 20.55 feet to the point of beginning. Encumbrances, continued 3 . Regulations, including levies, liens, assessments, rights of way, and easements of Tualatin Valley Water District. 4 . The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the limits of S.W. Greenburg Road. ).44'%■ JUN-18 01 09:29 FROM:WASH C0 SURVEYOR 503-846-2909 TO:503 639 1232 PAGE:01'01 JUN-18-01 MON 09:00 HAFT -Mc MONAGLE FAX HO. 503 1 1232 P. 02/02 WASHINGTON COUNTY LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION SURVEYOR'S OFFICE 8LJBI)I FASIXON PLAT ATAIWINGF I request that the ashingtop County Surveyor's Office reserve the follows g subdivision name: PROPOSED NAME OF SI BOIVISION: z 5,99,E E 7 5 MAP AND TAX LOT NU BER: ,s i_ �--GA T/L /90,3, /_,5-- CITY JURISDICTION ( hIeh City?) OR 1 77-644;. COUNTY JURISDICTION# SURVEYOR'S NAME: 0/,'f kj�(fl//1/4:! . OWNER'S NAME: I 77,-0 e.Q / . ...i .. 1 I understand that if the name is not used within two years, it will be automatically canOeled. Name of person reserving name: /�/ ��—�d��� � Address: /2-ASS . /, ei,-Te # ' 4 - Telephone number: . Fax number:L.3F/ Jc =1111106 [ -, Signatur- //,%�� = Date: / 1 (o. 16'0/ ib,yl6 ,. r? c)-- (9q gy(v-Vic) Name approved ! Washington County Sur4'eyor's Office i gy(g-y.'as 155 North First Avenue, S ite 350-15 Hillsboro, OR 97123 Fax: I F_\SMARED\SURVEY‘WPSHARE\SU NAME.DOC . I =rle Number f VA Sensitive Area Pre-Screening S ite Assessment Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County Jurisdiction 1 Date //f�c Map & Tax Lot (5i 2<<, 1-f ry -4,1 Owner Site Address ;,-.J30 /fr-fici Contact S ,4e-eR (/4: 1 Proposed Activity Address f 1.rc5 / ;-'-q' 6/ 7...77-- 5: 1-6`` fir /4C'1.4- Phone Sc--3 - i-e=?-lf Y N NA Y N NA n USA Composite Map Stormwater Infrastructure maps L 01X,� Map # 0 0 0, QS # n ❑��( Locally adopted studies or maps 0 Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of USA Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order 00-7: Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas ill exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources \'(.,k6U Assessment Report may also be required. Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. I 1 The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By: Date: Retrir#ed to Applicant Marl ax Counter Date 'W-O\ By 4767 . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, s .-ems VA; , being duly sworn, depose and say thbt on I T AAR,.c�h_. , ' /, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attacd list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) /f� I. L-430 I Ci-fSc., 5' LJ RQ�rl.hc/y2 k-() a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at f /4>Z.) Dch.� �_v, , with postage prepaid thereon. 4 A,. , ... 4.......r..., . 0 :Ig % n the pr-se'' Hof a Notary Public) . ` (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) (1001 Subscribed and sworn/afFimied before me on the I (Q day of ' ' , fit--. v� OFFICIAL SEAL y ERIKA BETH BLORGESON ` NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON ; ' COMMISSION NO.331079 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.30,2004 NOTA-Y ' BLIC OF of EGON My Commission Expires: (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) TNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: G�1-'17;7• --- p d>pe.3• TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 6 6-c'T' Sca�; .1,4)'s'/�-L- Name of Applicant/Owner: � x vv1 C 4-x77(e I I Address or General Location of Subject Property: . i i 4�6 I(41c :5 ) C-kea-'.1 LI I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): t 1 1 35 c4 (4 di ' /5o,) I h:lbgin\patty4nasterslaf fmail.mst (SIGNS ARE AVAILABLE FOR 'CHASE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE 7UNTER AT THE PRICE OF$2.00 EACH.) NOTICE Developer to hold NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING concerning proposed development of this property. Meeting Date Time Location c -f 4,40 -3 ( -2-4( 0 ( �� (� RPM R� PROPOSED PROJECT: For More Information Contact: Developer Name: )°�'v`--e-' _ VA I Address: zt, i.�F ce AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 1NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 9722.3 i, 5 .._.. . 1/, (( , do affirm hat I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed d L t/15i affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lots) currently registered) (-4 36 - 1 1 2) 5'-&) teFR-eil.. R0 , and did on the ! 9 day of yr of personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 't d.1 vc S!.e).-N application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at I5'? el.1 Lp (state location you posted notice on property) T41- In the pr--en e of a Not.% Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) 200 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of ilfetfC , . r OFFICtAL SEAL y ERIKA BETH BORGESON �► NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.331079 NOTAR P BLIC 0 0' : GON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.30,2004 My Commission Expires: • (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TIT( ?_ r 2'pegiTl e' r TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: C �-��T" 5;4 dtJ/-5/i?1-. Name of Applicant/Owner: t e .A's 77(. _ I Address or General Location o Subject Property: 1. _ J t-13 _ _ �-� (7.;i225++1 G,, (Subject Property Tax Map(s)an d Lot#(s): 15 1 3 S C t-� 'I I Si r h:Vogin\patty\masters\affpost mst CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECEIVED PLANNING DIVISION _, CITY OF TIGARD FEB 2 5 2001 Community KDevetopment 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping ABetterCommunity TIGARD, OREGON 97223 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297(Attu: Patty or Shirley/Planning) R[UUES4F 1 'Q0LEJ 111 OWNER' MAILING. LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 15134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): I 5 , � . j �_� 5 J (4e)73 INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: ..� (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ( PHONE: 50 3 This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet = $8.00 x sets = $16.00 c sheet(s) of labels x S2/sheet = $ /0 x 3 sets = _2_sheets of labels x S2/sheet for CIT area x sets = $ 4.00 sheet(s) of labels x S2/sheet for CIT area = $4 x_ sets = $ `/ GrwrRATr t I T = St I nn GENERATE LIST = SILO( TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = c 1S135CA-03700 1S135CA-01702 AASVE SANDRA J AND DAVID J DAVIS PETER S&KAREN M BOROSKE 4829 SE 10TH TER 4348 SW WASHOUGA AVE GRESHAM,.OR 97080 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135CA-04000 1 S 135CA-017 ALDERMAN SHAWN J& DAVIS PETER KAREN M BOROSKE ROCHE TORI L 4348 SW W O GA AVE 11345 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAN ,OR 97 01 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-00100 1 S 135CA 1704 ALVARADO MARTA M TRUSTEE DAVIS PE S&KAREN M BOROSKE 11525 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW A OUGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 POR ND,0 97201 1 S135DB-05700 1 S 135CA-0170! BARNEY CHARLES R&CATHY L DAVIS PETE S . REN M BOROSKE 11450 SW 95TH AVE 4348 SW WAS •UGA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAN', SR •7201 1 S 135CA-02304 1 S 135CA-01700 BOELLING KAREN E DAVIS STEVE&BARBARA JOHNSON ROBERT A 11300 SW 97TH CT 11500 SW GREENBURD RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02100 15135CD-01702 CARMICHAEL THOMAS L DOBLIE JUDY K MAIMBERG TATIANA E 11640 SW 98TH AVE 11375 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01900 1 S135CD-01500 CARROLL SONDRA DORSETT R CRAIG PO BOX 231025 11550 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01403 1 S 135CD-09200 CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW DURHAM RD PO BOX 23603 PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 1 CA-01500 1S13' 0-09000 CAST JAMES&AUDREY DRENN• D, (ID A&JOAN&JOHN 8100 SW .. HAM RD PO BOX .03 TIGARD,OR 24 TIG I,OR ' 281 1S135CA-02400 1S1 D-091 DAVIS MARGARET M TRUSTEE DREN AVID A&JOAN&JOHN 11470 SW GREENBURG RD P0,130X 603 TIGARD,OR 97223 1GARD,0 97281 1S 135CD-00202 1S135CA-04600 • DRENNAN DAVID A&JOAN L GREELEY BARBARA J DRENNAN JOHN W 17190 S BECKMAN RD • PO BOX 23603 OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S1 CD-08900 1S135CA-01100 DREN •N JOH W/DAVID A& GROW RUSSELL B&ALICE M JOAN 11455 SW 98TH PO BOX •13 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGA::,OR 17281 15135CD-03601 1S 135CD-00205 EATON RICHARD B&LINDA L HASTING THOMAS D 9625 SW LEWIS LN SHARON M TIGARD,OR 97223 9555 SW LEWIS LA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-01600 1 S 135CD EMPKIE ROBERT JR HAZEL HASTING T M D&SHARON M 6975 SW QUEEN LN 9555 SW LE N BEAVERTON,OR 97008 TIGAR 972 3 1S 135DB-06000 1 S 135CD-01703 ESTORJA MICHAEL T HELTZEL KENNETH L&HELEN M 11540 SW GREENBURG RD 5131 SW FREEMAN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S 135CA-04200 1 S 135CA-03400 F G F DEVELOPMENT INC HERNANDEZ JOSE R& 905 NW 20TH AVE JURADO MARIA S& PORTLAND,OR 97209 HERNANDEZ-J MAURILIO 11253 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01202 1S135CA-01901 F T A INC HERNANDEZ SUANNY& 4315 SW SELLING CT HERNANDEZ NOHEMY& PORTLAND,OR 97221 LORENZO-CARMONA LUIS 9640 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-04700 1 S 135CA-03100 FEENEY NANCY L JAMES FRED C 9771 SW NORTH DAKOTA 9545 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-03000 1S 135CA-02302 FREUDENTHAL MICHAEL J& JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC LAURINDA L 738 NE DAVIS 9568 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST PORTLAND,OR 97332 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CD-01700 1S135CA-02 00 GETTY SHARON MARIE JANIS YO OGRAMS INC 11630 SW 98TH 738 NE DAV TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLA I/,0 97232 1 S 135CA-01800 1 S 135CD-00200 JAUCH ROGER P LEWIS DAVID E&MARSHA E TRS JAUCH BRENT H 9575 SW LEWIS LN 10648 SW 41ST AVENUE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135C0-03500 1S135CD-0 201 JOY DANIEL J LEWIS DA E&M SHA E TRS 9655 SW LEWIS LN 9575 SW LE S TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND e 97223 1 S 135CA-06800 1 S 135CD-00101 JUNGKIND SOPHIE TR LEWIS DAVID F&MARSHA F TRUSTE 8105 SW 68TH RD 9575 SW LEWIS LN PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-03400 1 S 135CD-00300 KNEELAND JAMES H&DEBORAH L LEWIS GARY M TRUSTEE 9690 SW LEWIS LN 3975 SW 97TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 1 S 135CA-03500 1 S 135CD-03600 KNOWLES TAMARA LEWIS SEAN M&JANEL K 11275 SW 95TH AVE 9595 SW LEWIS LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01902 1 S 135CA-04500 KOCIEMBA DIANE E LHOTKA GLEN M PO BOX 231021 11310 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-08300 1 S 135CA-07200 LAMET DANIEL G LINDQUIST STUART H 11355 SW 97TH CT PO BOX 42135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97242 1S135CD-00790 1S13 -0730 LAMM FAMILY TRUST LINDA STUART H 11520 SW 98TH AVE PO B 4 135 TIGARD,OR 97223 PO TLAND, R 97242 1 S 135CA-04400 1 S 135CA 710 LEE PAUL TRUSTEE LINDQUI STUART H 2206 NE 45TH PO BO 4 35 PORTLAND,OR 97213 PO ND,OR 97242 1S135CA 4300 1S135CA-01200 LEE PAUL USTEE MACY RAYMON 2206 NE 11380 SW GREENBURG RD PORT ND,O 97213 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135C0-00500 1S135CA-02200 MAHAR MARYLOU RODGERS TERRY 0 AND CHERYL 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY#129 Go MURO DANIEL AND KELLY TIGARD,OR 97223 11405 SW 95TH TIGARD,OR 97223 is 135CA-02303 is 135CD-08800 MICKEL TOM 0&JUDITH A SATTERLUND SCOTT C&CYNTHIA K 10261 SW STUART CT PO BOX 230269 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S i 35CA-03600 1 S 135CD-00900 MORADO SEBASTIAN&LUZ MARIA& SHARON DEVELOPMENT CO LLC MORADO JORGE L 5795 SW CRANBERRY CT 11289 SW 95TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-04100 1 S 135CA-08400 NGUYEN HUNG Q SLIMICK DANIEL&MARY 11355 SW 95TH AVE 11344 SW 97TH CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135CA-07400 1 S 135CA-03800 PARTIITON P T 1996-027 SPADY PATRICIA J OW RS LOTS 1 2&3 11321 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-01001 1 S 135CA-04800 PERONA BERNARDITA J& SWARNER SANDI PERONA MOISES JR& 9775 SW NORTH DAKOTA PERONA ANITA JIMENEZ TIGARD,OR 97223 11365 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-02301 1 S 135CA-01300 PETERSON GEORGIA V TABB JAMES R 11487 SW 95TH AVE 11400 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CA-00902 1 S 135CA-00307 QUAIL COURT APARTMENTS LLC TAMARYN ASSOCIATES 5400 BAY CREEK DR PO BOX 1450 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 PACIFIC PALISADES,CA 90272 1 S 135CA-03900 is 135CA-02900 RASMUSSEN JAMES& TAYLOR GEORGENE KAREN 9580 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 11343 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135CD-00600 1 S135CD-01001 REED KATHLEEN M TAYLOR ROBERT H&NANCY A 11435 SW GREENBURG RD 11585 SW 98TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135 A-01203 TIGAR CI OF 13125 S ALL TIGAR , 97223 1 S 135CD-00700 TORLAND DORIS 11425 SW GREENBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CD-01701 VEZEY CHERYL ANN 11650 SW 98TH • TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CA-01401 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 1 S 135CA-03300 WHITE HEIDI A& KENNETH A 11231 SW 95TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1813508-05600 WINTHER STEPHEN&TERESA 11400 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135CA-01402 WONG NORMAN K F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11TH PORTLAND,OR 97212 1S135CA-0 00 WONG NO At F AND ANN M 2433 NE 11T PORTLANp (OR 97212 , mairi SPENCER VAIL O PLANNING CONSULTANT March 12, 2001 RE: Neighborhood Meeting Dear Property Owner I represent the owner of the property located at 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Rd. ( legally described as 1 S 1 35CA-Tax Lots 1403 and 1500). This letter is to advise you a proposal to subdivide the property into six lots. The location of the site and the proposed lot division is shown on the map on the reverse side of this letter. Before to applying to the City of Tigard for a the necessary land use approvals and any other necessary permits I would like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding property owners and residents. The purpose of the meeting is to provide a forum to review the proposal and to identify issues that should be considered prior to the application. You are invited to a meeting on: Thursday, March 29, 2001 Tigard City Hall—Red Rock Creek Conference Room 13125 SW Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 7:00- 8:00 PM Please note that this is an informational meeting on Preliminary development plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to City. We look forward to meeting with you and discussing the proposal. Please feel free me if you have questions. Very truly yo rs pe cer H. Vail 4505 N.E. 24TH AVENUE • PORTLAND, OREGON 97211 • 503/281-8245 • FAX 503/284-5506 MINUTES OF MEETING March 29,2001 Spencer Vail, Planning Consultant for the developer, opened the meeting at 7:00 PM in the Red Rock Creek Conference Room in the Tigard City Hall complex. As will be noted on the sign-up sheet,two people attended the meeting. Vail explained that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss preliminary plans for a 6 lot subdivision and that such meetings were a requirement of the City of Tigard Development Code. He indicated the subject area on a reference map and distributed a copy of the site plan to each attendee. He discussed of access and that the existing houses would remain. He also explained the minimum density requirements of the city and went over how the density for this site was calculated. Following is a list of the questions or areas of concern that were raised and the responses thereto: Q1. Will any of the new lots access onto 97th Court? ANS.: No. The existing driveway to the house on lot 1 will be redesigned to come off Tract"A" Q2. What is the size and cost of the new units? ANS.: The cost has not been determined but it would be reflective of neighborhood values. Q3. Would the units be sold or are they rentals? ANS..: It was Mr. Vail's understanding that they would be be sold on the open market. Q4. Will it be subsidized housing? ANS..: No Q5. Will the lots be fenced? ANS...: Fences would be the option of the purchaser. Mr. Vail stated that he was not aware of any specific code requirement that would require fences. The two attendees left at 7:25PM. No one else arrived. The meeting room was secured at 8:00PM. Respec ly Aioe AgIA `4-ncer H. Vail • ATTENDANCE ROSTER MEETING DATE: 3 /2-61 ( 0 / PLEASE PRINT! NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE PHONE # j/41( 630, i q 7 z gr,./az,c), 2_038 ,�� �il P�f ©,� 9 7 zir ,s-5 3 glotms197conway1slgn In.doo Proposal Nr rfiv EASU ESTATES A SIX LOT SUBDIVISION PROPOSAL with Adjustments APPLICANT: James and Audrey Castile 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, Or 97224 REPRESENTATIVES: Spencer H. Vail, Planning Consultant 4505 NE 24th Portland, Oregon 97211 Harris-McMonagle Associates Engineer-Surveyor 12555 SW Hall blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 DEEDHOLDERS: James and Audrey Castile 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, Or 97224 SITE LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1S1 35CA-Tax Lots 1403 and 1500 SITE SIZE: 0.60 acres or 26,136 sq.ft. ZONING: R-12, Medium Density Residential PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 6 lots as depicted on the attached site plan. An early grading permit is also requested. Subdivision Request-Easu Estates Castile's Greenburg Rd. property SITE DESCRIPTION: The site of the proposed subdivision site is a 0.60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, 1403 and 1500. There is a single family home on each of the two lots. These homes will remain with one being on proposed lot 1 and the other on proposed lot 5. The home on tax lot 1500 currently has access off of SW 97th Ct. The proposed subdivision calls for relocating that access tq Tract "A". SURROUNDING AREA: The surrounding area is also zoned R-12. SW 97th Court which abuts the east side of the subject property, provides access to several residential uses on the internal lots. There are single family homes on the lots to the east and west of the subject property. There are multi family dwelling to the south across SW Greenburg Rd. ZONING CODE: The following Code sections are deemed applicable to this proposal: Chapter 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts Section 18.510.020.F states that the R-12 zone is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,035 square feet. A wide range of Civic and institutional uses are also permitted as conditional uses. Section 18.510.040.A sets forth the minimum and maximum densities. It states that the minimum density in each zoning district have been established at 80% of the maximum density. Section 18.510.040.B states that the establishment of the appropriate densities is governed by the formulas is Chapter 18.715. This chapter and the density calculations are discussed on pages 3 and 4. Section 18.510.040.0 pertains to Adjustments in the density requirements. This proposal will not require this type of Adjustment. Section 18.510.050 and Table 18.510.2 set forth the Development Standards for the R-12 zone. (1) The Code minimum lot area is 3,050 sq.ft.* -page 2- Subdivision Request-Easu Estates Castile's Greenburg Rd. property * Section 18.430.020.D allows for lots less than the minimum lot size allowed in the underlying zone as long as • the average lot size is not less than allowed by the underlying zoning district. In this case that average is 3780 sq.ft. In addition, none of the proposed new lots is less than 80%of the minimum lot size as allowed in the R-12 zone.(Also see discussion of 18.430 on page 5) (2) There is no minimum lot width. (3)(a) Minimum front yard for single family homes is 15 feet.* Minimum setback for corner lots is 10 feet for each street frontage. (c) Minimum side yard is 5 feet. (d) Minimum rear yard is 15 feet. (e) All abutting property is zoned R-12 (f) Minimum distance between property line and front of garage is 20 feet. (4) Maximum height is 35 feet. (5) Maximum lot coverage is 80% (6) Minimum landscaping is 20 %. All lots meet the minimums described above and all new construction will comply with the above referenced dimensional standards. No Variances from these standards will be required to develop this site. Note: There is a Special Setback of 30 feet from center line on SW Greenburg. The proposed subdivision and building envelop will maintain a 40 foot setback. Chapter 18.715- Density Calculations Section 815.715.020 sets forth the formula for Density Calculations. The gross site area involved is 0.60 acres or 26,136 sq.ft. From this amount, subtractions are made for the following: 26,264 sq.ft total lot area 3,585 sq.ft. dedicated for roadway Tract"A" 22,679 sq.ft. -page 3- Subdivision Request-Easu Estates Castile's Greenburg Rd. property This 22,679 sq.ft. is considered to be the buildable area The amount is divided by the 3,050 sq.ft. minimum lot size. The result, 7.44 is the maximum number of lots allowed on the site. 80% of 7.44 , or 5.9 lots, would be the minimum number of lots allowed by Code. Six lots are being proposed which satisfies this Code requirement. Chapter 18.730-Exceptions to Development Standards This Chapter presents exceptions to the height and setback standards contained in the various zoning districts.No exceptions from the requirements of this chapter is required. Chapter 18.795-Visual Clearance The proposed public streets have been design to comply with the visual clearance criteria of the City's codes. No deviation from the standards is necessary. Chapter 18.765- Off-Street Parking Section 18.765.080 requires one off-street parking space per single family dwelling unit. All homes constructed in the subdivision will have one or two car garages. Chapter 18.705- Access, Egress and Circulation The private roadway, Tract"A", is 30 feet wide with a 24 foot wide paved.. See street profile Sheet 1. Chapter 18.790- Tree Removal As can be noted on the site plan,there are no trees with a diameter of 12" within the building footprints of the proposed new lots therefore none will be removed. Additionally, new street trees will be planted for each of the lots as they are developed as required by code. Chapter 18.430- Subdivision Standards This Chapter sets forth the general provisions and approval process for new subdivisions with the city of Tigard. The submittal materials contain the information required by this chapter. As noted above, the application is making use of Section 18.430.020.D- Lot Averaging. The lot sizes range from 5104 sq.ft. (Lot 1) to 3019 sq.ft. (lot 4). -page 4- Subdivision Request-Easu Estates Castile's Greenburg Rd. property The average lot size (22,679/6) is 3,780 which is above the 3050 sq.ft. minimum required by the Code. (Also see discussion of 18.510.050(1) on page 3). Chapter 18.810-Street and Utility Improvements This Chapter provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers and drainage and takes into account the comments provided in the pre- application notes. The proposed private accessway, Tract"A", is designed to conform to the recommended right-of-way and improvement widths established by the City. See notations in upper left corner of the site plan. The area between SW Greenburg Road and SW North Dakota Street, west of SW 95th Avenue contains a mixture of residential uses. There is a private easement (SW 97th Ct.)that provides access to otherwise landlocked parcels Utilities A new sanitary sewer line will be constructed in Tract"A" to serve the new lots. That line will connect to an existing 8" sanitary sewer in SW Greenburg Road. Water is provided to the site by the Tigard Water Dept. A new water line will be constructed in Tract"A" to serve the proposed lots. That line will tie into an existing 12" water line in SW Greenburg Road Fire protection is provided by the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue ADJUSTMENTS Section 18.430.060 states that Adjustments may be authorized as part of the Subdivision review process. The subject proposal attempts to incorporate the existing single family into the subdivision design. To accomplish this, Adjustments to Code yard setback standards are necessary. Specifically an Adjustment to reduce the side yard from the Code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. -page 5- Subdivision Request-Easu Estates Castile's Greenburg Rd. property The criteria for approving Adjustment requests are contained in 18.370.020.C1. Section 18.370.020.0.1-Special Adjustments 1. Adjustments to development standards within subdivision(Chapter 18.430). The director shall consider the application for adjustment at the same time he/she considers the preliminary plat. An adjustment may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied provided the Director finds: a. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property which are unusual and particular to the land as compared to other lands similarly situated; Comment:. There are two parcels involved in this subdivision, each containing a single family home. Minimum density requirement dictate that the proposed subdivision contain at least 6 six lots. As proposed,that would be two with the existing homes and 4 new, buildable lots. The applicant does not own any of the adjoining properties. b. The adjustment is necessary for the project design or function of the subdivision; Comment: The proposed subdivision will retain the two existing houses. (See lots 1 and 5). In so doing,the minimum density requirement and the dimensional and lot area requirements for the R12 zone are such that a reduction in side yards as described above is necessary. c. The granting of the adjustment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of property; and Comment: Granting the requested variances will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the rights of other owners of property. The development is as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. Single family homes will be constructed with a one foot reduction in side yard requirements. This reduction will still provide for adequate air, light and safety areas around the homes, the major rationale for side yards. d. The adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right because of an extraordinary hardship which would result from strict compliance with the regulations of this title -page 6- Subdivision Request-Easu Estates Castile's Greenburg Rd. property Comment: It is not economically feasible to demolish the two existing houses and redesign the subdivision. They are structurally sound and have many years of residential use remaining. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon the information provided above, the 6 lot subdivision should be approved. SHV/me June 21, 2001 -page 7- HARRIS - McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES INC. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS 12555 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OREGON, 97223 TEL. (503) 639-3453 FAX. (503) 639-1232 July 26, 2001 Mr. Brian D Rager, P.E. City of Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Dear Brian: RE: EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION WATER QUALITY FACILITY. The preliminary plat has been submitted for review and comment. At the pre-application conference we discussed the possibility of a fee in lieu of construction of a water quality facility. In the preparation of the preliminary plan, the locations of the two existing homes were determined as well as the to topography of the site and the existing public facilities. C.W.S (U.S.A.) requires at least 100 feet for a water quality swale. The proposed plan towards the westerly, lower side of the site has only 80 feet and would be in the side yard of the proposed home. If a facility were to be constructed in this location it would need to be in a tract, which would eliminate one lot. Due to the very small flows to the facility, 0.03 C.F.S. the pose a difficult maintenance problem for the city crews from now on. Considering the above, it seems reasonable that a fee in lieu of constructing the water quality facility should be allowed. The detention required will be accommodated with approximately 401.f of 24-inch pipe as part of the storm system, and will be placed within the private street area. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sinc ely Wil;a' L. McMo PROJECT: EASU ESTATES 7/26/01 JOH SUBJECT: STORM WATER DETENTION VOLUME hyd/det CRITERIA: a. Rational formula-Q=CiA, where: Q=flow,cfs i =rainfall intensity,in/hr A=drainage area,acres b. Intensity-Duration-Frequency values for: EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY-WCRIDS c. Release rate based on a 25 year event,site undeveloped. d. Inflow rate based on a 25 year event, site developed. RELEASE RATE CALCULATIONS(Site Undeveloped) Area of site,A 0.62 acres Time of concentration,Tc 10 minutes Storm event 25 year Intensity, @ Tc 2.54 in/hr Runoff factor, C 0.39 Release rate,Q 0.61 cfs INFLOW PARAMETERS(Site Developed) Storm event 25 year Runoff factor, C 0.52 STORAGE CALCULATION DURATION INTENSITY INFLO STORM VOL RELEASE VOL STORAGE minutes in/hr cfs cubic feet cubic feet cubic feet 10 2.54 0.82 491 368 123 15 2.07 0.67 601 552 49 20 1.77 0.57 685 737 25 1.56 0.50 754 921 30 1.40 0.45 812 1,105 35 1.28 0.41 863 1,289 40 1.17 0.38 909 1,473 _ 45 1.09 0.35 950 1,657 50 1.02 0.33 988 1,842 55 0.96 0.31 1,023 2,026 60 0.91 0.29 1,056 2,210 65 0.86 0.28 1,087 2,394 STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED 123 cubic feet PROJECT: EASU ESTATES SUBJECT: STORM WATER DETENTION VOLUME DISCHARGE ORFICE SIZING 25 YEAR EVENT a= Q/C(2gh)' Where: a=area of orfice Q=discharge,cfs h=head,ft. C=discharge coefficient g=gravitational acceleration(32.2 ft/sec') Q h cfs ft. C 0.61 2.0 0.62 a= 12.56 sq. in. Diameter= 4.00 in. storage required= 123 cubic feet pipe lengths for storage diameter length (inches) (feet) 12 156 15 100 18 69 21 51 24 39 27 31 30 25 36 17 42 13 48 10 60 6 72 4 I Ursa•.•• - I .( I I I I.I - , ' ':_- h .MN 1 I I I n \'' 41 : rm,_ --I '.\ I Ia I I.:.. -.J _' --SIY`'Ih ' 4 .,et. I p01 FJ f_4 �A W I \L_..__1_- j L_ •,1� i13 , _, , vwe' , s we x w 1f'.0 pr _�. j �'1 .� JI -1`� I j i ---{-- •-C3 -'-." I .ct- � ��FOR n II f I I 1 r 1 st,ucu `3 .1 {„�•➢ y �H -r e' [c -I --A I r I -Lf ,i —" — I --- -- —, ' -� n',�' wr ow ELM - - -I i I ;r Y- ` .e na-,.. • ,:s 7 net -� a ._. .o.. _ _ 11�� VICINITY MAP ,,,,®t o•., a rint corzficrox n eia'm i,ra.a.SD I _ i I .� . .., R.�.a m..,o..o.K..,,.... I I 4 I I — '" I ' LT I Il _ L.", 1 llAllVlO ^ ,∎ ___. J I I r eat �.. MwnA1 142 _ I'wmlif t__�--J 700 1 �._. L I 6 j ' • ---I 4b I _ i i 1- _�NVac A 1 I ` .�'' -.T�--. I I tt p PRE—APPLICATION �' I �y ; NE 1/4 SW 1/4 SECTION 35 T1S R1W W.M. f `� _` I I '�� TAX MAP: IS 1 35CA __ ^ I I '��� TAX LOT: 1403 k 1500 `1 � I EA. _ ZONING: R-12 (MIN.LOT SIZE 3,050 SF) \. ? i :_ II usf ``:rto na�Ixl; _+. // 1 I FRONT YARD 15' +++ ` _ �L 2 REAR YARD 15' __` I l sloe vino s' (zD: EEC. - a') A +`'` p.K 1�I CORNER D 10' i _`` s. I I 1 ■ 7-> _ +. y` I EXISTING USE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS W - Sw+++ �� PROPOSED USE SIX SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS W I``` • et, 111%., M:v,:e '� �M 1 « LOCATION: 11430 SW R ENBUNG RD.AND `` ' _ + _ -�� ��,: __. ' 8I I 11450 SW CREENBURG RD. .O ` ` ...."••• `_ +�--- .4. I16 I TIGARD, OREGON 97223 e A LOT 4 1 I�.1���-_ \ `'+ �'i�`', I -1• f)�u0pf __J 1r LOT 5 -- TYPICAL SECTION MAP 15 1 35413 —�- _�� $ my n.n n• I l L i I ••••• ---0 JO Q JO (' I i - SCALE:— _ sPENCER vAH JIM CASTILE PROPERTIES • t•�s0 • NI.IM"OM N.LW 8100 91.DUgi1W RD rn.. ° '�" Mo °88°°" n' EASU ESTATES 1 -- — — HARRIS-McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES, INC. mac- mOnYY ---rYl Aft. ..t 0!/1./xW, I P.;:•M. L ELVD.. - n ItIM 10 1MCK m11 MAT 1110181011 ilk rAl`,I' CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS 12/12/2001 FILE NO.: SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2001-00005 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2001-00012 FILE TITLE: ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: Bill McMonagle OWNER: James & Audrey Castile Harris-McMonagle Associates 8100 SW Durham Road 12555 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: ❑ TYPE I © TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: AUGUST 16, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: AUGUST 30, 2001 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑ CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ® UTILITY PLANS ® SITE PLAN ® GRADING PLANS ® IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ❑ GEOTECH REPORT [l ARBORIST REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheideqqer, Assistant Planner(51:3) 639-4171,x317 LAND USE APPLIC1'ION 3 teect�o � p� ESTATES COMPLETENESS REVIEW COMPLETE INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership [2'' Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees Impact Study (18.3901) IV- USA Service Provider Letter n Construction Cost Estimate ] # Sets Of Application Materials/Plans [� Pre-Application Conference Notes R/ Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: Building Footprint Size [� % Of Landscaping On Site ❑ % Of Building Impervious Surface On Site �, [ Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: L Building Footprint I I Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible& Bike Parking) ❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable I I Building Height [ Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: (V' Vicinity Map ❑ rchltect r u ❑ Tree Inventory Conditions Plan ❑ nape P1a11 (Site Plan ❑-tfglrtiRg--Pan 1 / TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: v 's 'Y J�re u ❑ ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) n II ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) I 18.620(Tigard Tnangle Design Standards) ❑ 1 8.165(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) U1 8.340(Director's Interpretation) U 1 8.630(Washington Square Regional Center) Li 18.115(Sensitive Lands Review) I 1 18.350(Planned Development) U 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 1 8.780(Signs) L1 8.3 60(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.370(Yanances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.115(Density Computations) _ 1 8.190(Tree Removal) Li 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.120(Design Compatibility Standards) C 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 1 8.125(Environmental Performance Standards) Cl 18.191(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) O 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 1 8.198(Wireless Communication facilities) n 1 8.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.140(Historic Overlay) ❑ 1 8.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 1 8.142(Home Occupation Permits) Li 1 8.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) [ I 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 1 8.150(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commeraal Zoning Districts) n 1 8.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Reading Storage) [J 1 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 1 8.160(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CH,teKLIST Project: FOR Date: LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS I1 ❑ COMPLETE 0 INCOMPLETE GRADING jExisting^ and proposed contours shown. L� Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes n-No Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREET ISSUES Right-of-way clearly shown? Centerline of street clearly shown? 1:1/- Name of street(s) shown? [r Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? Profiles of proposed streets Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? Traffic study required/submitted? [- Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? 3'-- Widths of proposed public streets shown? ❑y' Widths of streets appropriate? Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ width appropriate? ['Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES • Existing/proposed lines shown? R Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? (� Existing/proposed fire hydrants? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES rt Existing/proposed lines? ❑ Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality and/or detention provided? ❑ Water quality and/or detention facility shown on plan? ❑ does area provided match calculations for size requirement? �❑ Stubs to adjacent properties required? Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i leng\brianrlrnasterslpubhc facility plan checklist tloc REVISED: 03/13/01 TRANSMITTAL Hams - McMonagle Associates, Inc. Engineers-Surveyors 12555 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel. (503) 639-3453 - Fax 639-1232 DATE: � RECEIVED APik77-TO: JUL 272001 77-644-e. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: ¢ WE ARE SENDING YOU ATTACHED THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: SHOP DRAWINGS PRINTS SAMPLES CHANGE ORDER COPY OF Lc I i ER PLANS DATA SPECIFICATIONS MYLARS OTHER: FOR YOUR: REVIEW COMMENTS APPROVAL USE FILE COPIES I DATE I f DESCRIPTION REMARKS: SIGNED:. "0"'- CITY OF TIGARD August 14, 2001 OREGON Bill McMonagle 12555 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal (Ease Estates Subdivision/SUB2001-00005NAR2001-00012) Dear Mr. McMonagle: The City has received the additional information necessary to begin the review of your Subdivision application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, -Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner is\cu rpin\mathew\sub\SUB2001-00005.acc.acc.doc.dot c: SUB2001-00005 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD 41". PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES cnTa'„a>ooM Community(Development (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) giving yF(Better Community RESIDENTIAL • PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: (Z1z$/6`C) STAFF AT PRf-APP: s/./?X APPLICANT: YJ�_6/t(err AGENT: Phone: (sec ) 631-3P( Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: // 132 6 //c'5 $ 1-- 6,rep_t+Itkul• TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): �>/, ' >C; } NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: (' S 0,) — - - PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: �..: ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C.I.T. AREA: �� FACILITATOR PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE:3PCOsq.ft. Average lot width: — ft. Maximum building height-3,5—ft. Setbacks: Front /S ft. Side ,S' ft. Rear /5 ft. Corner /_1_,=:) from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: t )% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:- /o. /o. (Refer to Code Section 18.S/0 1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the Land Partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1% times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. .o beam acc000 .tIlU.UbOI QTY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page I of I I ksidmtwl AppGamn/Plamot Diroion Srcoon SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ Streets: feet from the centerline of .- / C'4D0a Flag lot: A ten (10)-foot side yard setback applies to all primary structures. ➢ Zero lot line lots: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each dwelling unit or garage. Multi-family residential building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential developments. (Refer to Code Section 18330) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. (See applicable zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements] re�`=r SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are REQUIRED to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 11/2 STORIES or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 21/2 stories, or 35 feet in R-7, R-12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Code Section 18.730.O10.C.2. are satisfied. -i RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION [See example below) The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: All sensitive lands areas including: ➢ Land within the 100 year floodplain; ➢ Slopes exceeding 25%; ➢ Drainageways; and ➢ Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. Public right-of-way dedication: ➢ Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or ➢ If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS Single-Family Multi-Family 43,560 sq.ft. of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 8.712 sq. ft. (20%)for public right-of-way 6.534 sq.ft. (15%)for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3.050(minimum lot area) - 3.050(minimum lot area) = 11A Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre *The Development Code requires t1I ta;!C!-it:..- ,:Y:.,:•;:c, A,v?ii?:t9 ;;Ei ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. *Minimum ..4...:.24uaiy is au%of the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD,MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page 2 of I I kidmwl Ipp&it osi lvri t Draws Stood BLOCKS The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the right-of-way line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development. When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0901 f. FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall: Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. • Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.FJ PARKING AND ACCESS ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. • Single-family Requires: One (1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One (1) space per unit less than 500 square feet. • Multiple-family Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. [Refer to Code Section 18.705 8,18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [Refer to Code Section 18.7651 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 11 Lesdmnal Appfiaoo.ml,ee.g Duo Semoo ACCESS WAYS ti Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: --7O Maximum access width: Minimum pavement width: C REQUIRED WALKWAY LOCATION Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. (Refer to Code Section 18.705) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT AT ROAD/DRIVEWAY, ROAD/RAILROAD, AND ROAD/ROAD INTERSECTIONS. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS ALONG CERTAIN SITE PERIMETERS. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER AND SCREENING STANDARDS that are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: along the north boundary. along the east boundary. along the south boundary. along the west boundary. TREET TREES STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two(2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements#or parking areas and accesses. iReta to Code Chapters 18.705,18.745 s 18.7651 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 11 ksdmeal kepliuoo.man.iot Dirac Sao. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ V--MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. io'4UuU Section 18.790.060.E1 an.OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page 5 of I I ksideoosl AfpGana/Plnset Dimas Secuoa SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Adjustment application may be filed for Director's review. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7751 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Sections 18.775.080.C.2. and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE ER 8 0196-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: THE VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25% of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED AS FOLLOWS: QTY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of I I ksidaaol Appliatioo/Plman Divoioe kcwe ➢ A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS OR LOTS intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R 8 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT THE WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: THE WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1,000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ MAJOR STREAMS IN TIGARD INCLUDE FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: THIS AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). QTY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page 7 01 11 Iesidawl AppkGII/01 ?then(*MI Seam • The standard Tualatin River riparian setback is 75 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • The major streams riparian setback is 50 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. Isolated wetlands and minor streams (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.197.030] Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. To be ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.050.0 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ - Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five (5) years; • That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.191.100] *NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. Applicant should review code for applicable criteria. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(cnnditiouJ Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ' 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors kterpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) �` 18.705(Access/Egress/Grndation) 18.180(Signs) 18.360(Iite Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Unit) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.310(Yariances/Adjusmsents) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(free Removal) 18.380(Toning Map/fext Amendments) 1 8.120(Design compatibility Standards) 18.795(visual aeannce Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Pewits) 3e 18.125(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.130(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.198(V&eless Corsmuniauon facilities) 18.410(lot line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810(Street&UnGty Improvement Standards) 1 8.420(land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) C>c, 18.430(sobs visions) 18.145(Landscaping d Screening Standards) 1 8.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 1 8.750(Manufactured/Mobil Horse Regulations) 8.520(co mercial Toning Disaict) t 18.755(Mixed Solid waste/Recyding Storage) I A clo. tmmg� � 18.160(Nonconforming ) otsrnnformn Situations) CFR Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of I I Residential Appliatiaamlam.g Di.aio.Semi). IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.155) PTY OF 11GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 0111 Reudecul AppliariaRtais.g Dwwo.Stenos • ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: i -- Q e - - die �i — Gam. . �r —� - / 1 / ��✓e / !_ _sip ic'_'—. / / < s c-7/Ac4r f L !/ erg Q'1�t - � � L� l e�,a. .,1. Q f l au /�, c:7 -e _s/4 uj*–`cs //Pt PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2 x 11" reduced scale site plan of the proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or Administrative Decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. QTY Of 11GARD Pre-Applintion Conference Notes Page 10 of 11 itudmcil Applinooe/Pl�Mnt Dimon Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A ten (10) business day, public appeal period follows all I4rj use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigardt��� - >�-��. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from th�'Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective, applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, (unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: , CITY TIGARI 'TANNING DI IS IN - STAFF PL 0 OLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHO E: (503) 639-4 FAX: (503) 684-7291 E-MAIL: _(stairs first name) @ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18[CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE]INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:\pattr\masters\Pre-App Notes Residential.doc (Engineering section:preapp.eng) Updated: 28-Feb-2000 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page I I of I I AesideMwl AppYatio./%ywwg nivisio.kcnon • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefull in con'unction with the notes •rovided to ou at the •re- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: a 1: f Date: /7 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization • Title transfer instrument or grant deed • Written summary of proposal • Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) • Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) • Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) • Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes • Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): 1 Vicinity Map '=42:1- Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map Preliminary Utilities Plan Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan • Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan „Rs_ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings `-EP Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES / COPIES OF. ALL APPLICATION MATFRIAI S. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8% x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines(2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ • Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ • Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with>6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ • Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Ga w VgJG111G1'lb - City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • Locations of existing dedicatee right-of-ways [] . Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5'intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements [] • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ ♦ Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ = Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) 0 ♦ A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for - purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots 0 If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ • The owner's authorized agent ❑ • The map scale, north arrow and date [] Proposed property lines [] Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ • Location and width of all water courses ❑ • Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ • Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 ' Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ + Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [] • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ • Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ • The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan • Location of trees to be removed ❑ • Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ • General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5. - • Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place Existing and proposed contour lines Slope ratios Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways (� Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility D Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) [I A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction D Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use [] Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure LI • Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height 0 i:\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 t o 3 ( l +i � * '. s 4 e� � $ , � M i i )1 r � p �r.:„...,...,.. 1,,, ,,,..,.., ,i, , .� `ems,$" -. s�-'" � '' i c �- z 3' ,16'2.4'' r ��� � to +Z. d r L_q� , 1 t 1 . + „, a ,. xd II i I 4 I 111 p �`" y' ;, :' w , _I,1:;'','..,...'ro ,> n a �{ ._ Shaping A Better Communit PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mapts): 15135CA Tax Lottsl: 1500 Use Type: Subdivision The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: I I SW to feet I SW to feet SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: ® Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW Greenburg Road, to include: feet of pavement concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities 1 -foot concrete sidewalk ® street trees spaced per TDC standards. 1 I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1116 Engineering Ieeartmeet Section [i Other: • ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb [ storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees [ I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: [ I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb [ I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk ( I street trees [ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees [ I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. I Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: [ 1 feet of pavement I I concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 elos.nq I.pana.a Satl.. 1 1 street trees (� street signs, traffic -ontrol devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. n Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: VI Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Greenburg Road. Prior to recording of the final plat, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Greenburg Road. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend a public sewer line to serve all proposed lots. The developer must also extend the public sewer as needed to serve adjacent unsewered parcels. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Eiilneerinp lepertment Soctlon Storm Sewer Improvements All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention is required. Submit preliminary sizing calculations with the subdivision application. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: VI Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1) Developer must provide a vehicle turnaround for garbage trucks, unless they can work out other arrangements with the garbage hauler. Any agreement with garbage hauler must be in writing and a copy given to the City prior to construction. 2) Developer must remove all existing driveways onto Greenburg Road (except for the new proposed private street entrance). TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Elileesrlq lepartme.t Section category. The TIF shall calculated at the time of buiV. 'q permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of TIF may be allowed to be deferre. Ail the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Ellltteertq'swartum seam Site Improvement F it (SIT). This permit is genera, Issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: � /. 114 0 l ENGINEERING DEP 1RTMENT S AF Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: [503)684-7297 i:leng\brianr templates\preap notes-eng dot Revised: April 21,2000 CITY UMW) Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section PRE-APPLICATION Ally ��i� CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Q FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: A///.ice/'/ %�'�/41-6. Address:j2S33Scd MA o Phone:G3S 3yS 3 Case No.: City: 7G4- Zip: 972 2-3 Receipt No.: r,l, Application Accepted By: Contact Person: //` ',4 Phone: ‘3c1;2 �✓�3'7� Date: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s):J/D C1.7;74 /Ud DATE OF PRE APP.: /3$� TIME OF PRE-APP.: Address: Phone: /— ' ✓ ` / q- PRE-APP. HELD WITH: / City: /- "1-7 Zip: '2Z Zy • Rev.12/6/2000 i:\curpinlmasterslrevised\Pre-App Request.doc Property Address/Location(s): /1930,4140 ///-45-e, 5,4?./ /+6 - 776 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS 0/2— e (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): /5 -/-3�G Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: es.// 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: —Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a O- Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn the subject jest property show the location to for the meetin of the subject property in relation to the prepare g. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings_ Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of D----Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM g7Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. Receipt #: 272000000000000U1664 Date: 12/1512000 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due PRE2000-00017 [LANDUS]PreApp Conf 100-0000-438000 $240.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check INDUSTRIAL PARK ON DURHAM 0 1832 $240.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $240.00 INDUSTRIAL PARK ON DURHAM 1832 8100 SW DURHAM RD. 503-639-1395 TIGARD,OR 97224 DATE l 2-1 13 I0-0 159 PAY TO ORDER R OF ��]., .; G � $ 246 ' 1 •t r -� r 66F-11L52: RS 8 0.z.... 7925 3.W.NN ranch RD. r TUALA 11N,OREGON 97062 BANKiicWEST 1-800-482265 FOR Ll 0.e.(✓1,91J ---- ------ O('IwMe Amancun Z�� • TRANSMITfAL ' Harris - McMonagle Associates, Inc. Engineers -Surveyors 12555 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel. (503) 6394453 - Fax 639-1232 DATE: / RECEIVED TO: DEC 14 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT: J/-1 WE ARE SENDING YOU ATTACHED THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: SHOP DRAWINGS PRINTS SAMPLES CHANGE ORDER COPY OF LETTER PLANS DATA SPECIFICATIONS MYLARS OTHER: FOR YOUR: REVIEW COMMENTS APPROVAL USE FILE COPIES I DATE I DESCRIPTION 2-- I I 1-r /4-t REMARKS: • SIGNED: HARRIS - McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES INC. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS 12555 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD OREGON, 97223 TEL. (503) 639-3453 FAX. (503) 639-1232 December 13, 2000 MEMO TO: CITY OF TIGARD FROM: BILL McMONAGLE SUBJECT: PROPOSED 6 LOT SUBDIVISION PRE APPLICATION CONFERENCE FOR LANDS AT 11430 AND 11450 S W GREENBERG ROAD. 1. THE HOMES TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THESE PROPOSED LOTS WILL BE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO FIT THE CONDITIONS OF THE LOT CONFIGURATIONS AND RETAIN THE EXISTING HOMES AS INDICATED. 2. THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS FOR ALL HOMES WILL BE VIA THE PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE. 3. A ZERO SIDE LOT LINE AND OR REDUCED SIDE YARD SET BACKS OF 3 FEET FOR EACH LOT IS REQUESTED TO ALLOW MORE FLEXIBILITY IN THE DESIGN AND A MORE EFFECTIVE BUILDING AREA. RECIPROCAL SIDE YARD MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THOSE LOTS UTILIZING REDUCED SIDE YARDS. 4. A FRONT YARD VARIANCE IS REQUESTED TO MODIFY THE SET BACK FROM 15 FEET TO 10 FEET TO ALLOW MORE USABLE PLAY AND OPEN AREA IN THE REAR YARDS. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS '' 2, 7 t.; 5cce..2Dc/-5 ( PP,Ea 006— / 7— RECEIVED PLpNNI AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE r1AR N 0 2001 WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO�tGA�D City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 • 1, S x i/At ( , do affirm hat I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed r £--T .�/cc vf5t- affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot s) currently registered) 3c I (-45- �,2�d.. l� f , and did on the I --s - day of A1.4 Rc2 k of personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 5',.4cll lit S("--, application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at /5r'1 S 4) _--;/Z..2.0,--1430 ," /a� � C,„.,,r'14„ •.„ l��,— l_,,� .4 -- 722 J 5:Adec� pf/‘. 45--(--F (state location you posted notice on property) :Ail hi,-A■AdiAllk, : I !'- In the pr-.e e of a Not_ % Public) itir (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) / eZOO I Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �P day of C' {(G h , - . „.;..T. , OFFICIAL SEAL 3 y ERIKA By EpTuH BORGESON a Ace; i COMMISSION NO.331079 NOTAR P BLIC 0 Of GON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN,30,2004 My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: ' A3'7 f(�— pf.m►PPJrT1' 5' ITYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: C.-....-r-- S,.�S LJ 5,6,-, :Name of Applicant/Owner: orSubject K, C-/4S'T -e_ I Address or General Location Subject Property: 11 3/}_/ 1 (-131a _ "cc-) (7'2et-rt"29 1q L 'l Subject Property ax Map(s)and Lot#(s): I S l 3 S CA (-4,�3 I 1 S/rr h:Uog in\pattyknasters\affpost.mst NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SUBDIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community Devetopment Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: August 16, 2001 FILE NUMBERS: SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2001-00005 ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2001-00012 FILE NAME: EASU ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet for the common lot lines of lots 2-3 and 3-5 and 5-6. ZONE: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 30, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard; 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 20, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. a City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." _p, CITY of TIGARD Ir'' Op •..o..... ..e..........�. ■ VICINITY MAP / IV SUB200I 00005 ME _ �A ■ VAR2001-00012 ��. ■m _ WW1 •.feu■ IN, g ■ EASU ESTATES � SUBDIVISION � %i!n ' a :■, V■ ■_ _ ,„, • fall' , 1 s w N at - t'lenn� . :a • I . "Nur- - I,400 4. 11111MW, MUM Iiiin;ftliall iiCI F 1•. ■ Ciry of Tigard Illak�da.11'I . �.■ w m NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION At, SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2001-00005 )-.���i ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 2001-00012 CITY OFTIGARD J ( ) Community Development ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION SFiapingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/12/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION CASE NOS.: Subdivision (SUB) SUB2001-00005 Variance (VAR) VAR2001-00012 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide a .60 acre parcel consisting of two adjoining tax lots, into 6 lots. There is a single-family home on each of the two lots. The homes will remain with one of the homes on proposed lot #1 and the other on proposed lot #5. An Adjustment is also being requested to reduce the side yard from the code required 5 feet to 4 feet of the common lot lines of lots 2-3, 4-5 and 5-6. APPLICANT: Bill McMonagle. OWNER: James & Audrey Castile Harris-McMonagle Associates 8100 SW Durham Road 12555 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District. ZONE: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 11430 and 11450 SW Greenburg Road; WCTM 1S135CA, Tax Lots 1403 and 1500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370, 18.390, 18.430, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Not e mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 12, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. VA eal: ector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11, 2001. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. ' likain-411/1111 All ..... .... ...,. VICINITY MAP - suB200 I 0000s lip =�_ ;��.• VAR200I 000 It =� ■■■ ���--,*r� ESAU ESTATES i ,, vim EOM ma „■I■ ■" SUBDIVISION gplinillEat u1■ II■ 11111 , ■1 ill I);- .ItA 1 It 4 i 1 g#_� ■ II �■ �' '�� iii r sst �� 111 ■1 1„ i `∎9:., io 1' N �•� , Will* VIII: L.�� =_ t��■�■■ `i �. :v.1 PiA= " ►lri INNEIVIII. 7.141 � _ .:.:.� S SIE E 11 8✓ # p 9 i ,o-e-` j ,rte -L N LN_ E 1 8. t Si r -r .- -, c) 1 I ° d Q .,-, , ,I fi r----, 4 r---_ I n ,, �V CC.-..--:.to s' .. ''.'-'l ' I Attila 1 :� < ill r w� - - �c\B '_ , .1i.. p , p to It imi.. CITY OF TIGARD 1' SUB2001.00005NAR2001.00012 SITE PLAN N ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION (Map Is not to scale) Letter of Transmittal Att 11 it City of Tigard DATE RECEIVED 4 \/ C f° v /-1 TO: f ce : 73i"(64 DEPT: FROM: PHONE NUMBER: RE: (Case number, site address, parcel number, etc.) COMMENTS: isdsts\focms\L.etterTransmittal.doc 07/31/01 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS DATED: �-) c c L , 2002 After Recording Return To: James and Audrey Castile 8100 S.W. Durham Rd Tigard, OR 97224 This Declaration made on the date hereinafter set forth by JAMES CASTILE and AUDREY CASTILE, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant". RECITALS: Section 1. Declarant is the present owner of certain real property in the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as Esau Estates Subdivision recorded with the Plat Records of Washington County, Oregon on 2002, hereinafter called the Property. Section 2. Declarant plans to sell lots within the subdivision with restrictions on use and obligations for the preservation of the property. Section 3. By adopting these Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, Declarant is not obligated to take any action other than those expressly provided herein. Owners acquiring said lots subsequent to this Declaration will have the advantage of the provisions of these Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. NOW,THEREFORE, Declarant subjects the Property to the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions set forth in this Declaration. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1. "Owners" shall mean and refer to the record owner, whether one or more persons or entities, of a fee simple title to any Lot(see below) which is a part of the Property, including contract sellers and contract buyers, but excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. Section 2. "Property" shall mean and refer to that certain real property described above, including all lots therein and Tract A thereof. Section 3. "Lot" shall mean and refer to any plot of land shown upon any recorded subdivision plat of the Property as a lot. Page 1 - DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS Section 4. "Lien" shall mean and refer to any written document evidencing the amount due and shall be recorded against real property in the County records of Washington County. Section 5. The Homeowners' Association shall consist of Declarant until all of said lots are sold by Declarant and then shall consist of all the Owners of said lots. ARTICLE II INTRODUCTION Section 1. General Declaration. The covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Declaration shall run with and be binding upon the Property and each lot and tract described above, or any division of any of the Property and be binding upon the Owners and Occupants and all others acquiring any interest in the Property, or any portion thereof, including the heirs, successors, and assigns of the Owners and Occupants and such other Persons. These covenants, conditions and restrictions shall inure to the benefit of the Owners and be burdens upon the land enforceable by the Declarant and by all Owners, Occupants, future Owners, and future Occupants. Section 2. Legal Descriptions of Properties. The Property that is subject to this Declaration shall be lots one through six and Tract A of Esau Estates subdivision. ARTICLE III USES OF THE PROPERTIES Section 1. Uses of Lot. All lots shall be used for single-family residential purposes only and shall be subject to the following restrictions in addition to any other governmental restrictions and requirements: A. Private driveways serving all lots shall be constructed to the weight and design specification required by the city fire marshal and city engineer. Private driveways shall conform to the standards and conditions of subdivision approval. B. All lots shall have reciprocal easements for ingress, egress, and utilities over the private street,Tract A. There shall be no vehicle parking permitted on Tract A. C. No lot shall be used except for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered or placed on any lot other than one single-family dwelling and private garage. Construction, use and maintenance of buildings and lots shall, at all times, conform to the City of Tigard Zoning and Building Codes requirements. D. All telephone, electric power service, natural gas and television wire connections shall be placed underground. E. All mailbox design and location standards must be approved by the U.S. Postal Service. Page 2 - DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS F. The improvements upon said lots shall be subject to the City of Tigard Building and Planning Codes. G. Once started, construction of all buildings must be substantially complete within six (6)months. No residence may be occupied prior to issuance of any occupancy permit by the City of Tigard. Landscaping must be one hundred percent(100%) installed and completed in those areas adjacent to the access easement and front yard prior to occupancy. The remainder of the property shall be fully landscaped within twelve (12) months of occupancy. H. After the initial sale of each of said lots, no Owner or Occupant shall post any advertisements, posters, or signs of any kind on the Property except a political sign or a"For Sale" sign placed by the Owner or by a licensed real estate broker,not exceeding eighteen (18) inches high and twenty-four(24) inches long on any lot. I. No trade, craft, business, professional, commercial or similar activity, other than allowed by the City of Tigard Zoning Ordinances, shall be conducted on any lot,or within any structure located on any lot, nor shall any goods,equipment,vehicles, materials or supplies used in connection with any trade, services, or business be kept, parked, stored, dismantled or repaired upon any lot or on any street within the Property. J. Those Owners or Occupants keeping domestic pets will abide by the City and County sanitary regulations and leash laws and the rules and regulations of this Declaration herein as may be created by Declarant. No animal or fowl of any kind shall be raised, bred, or kept on any lot, except that cats, dogs,birds, or other household pets may be kept provided they are not bred or maintained for any commercial purposes. In any event, they shall not be kept in numbers or under conditions so as to become a nuisance to the surrounding lots and neighboring properties. K. None of said lots, or tract A, shall be used as a dump for grass, tree leaves, clippings, trash or rubbish of any kind. All garbage and other waste shall be kept in appropriate sanitary containers for property disposal. Yard rakings, dirt and other materials resulting from yard maintenance or landscaping work shall not be dumped onto streets or surrounding Property. Should any Owner or Occupant fail to remove any trash,rubbish,garbage or other such materials from Owner's or Occupant's lot or any street whether deposited by Owner or Occupant within ten (10) days following the date of notification is given to said Owner or Occupant by a neighboring homeowner or Declarant, the neighboring homeowner or Declarant shall have such materials removed and charge the expenses of such removal to the lot Owner. This prohibition shall not include a well-maintained compost pile on a lot owned by depositor. L. Inoperable cars or other unsightly vehicles shall not be stored on any of said lots,unless screened from neighbors by landscaping or structures approved by the Homeowners'Association. Recreational vehicles,motor homes,large boats likewise shall not be parked or stored in the easement area nor kept on the Properties unless properly housed in an approved structure or behind approved screening. Section 2. Use and Maintenance of Roadway. Tract A is a private street to provide lots access to SW Greenburg Road. Each of the Owners of the lots shall comply with the following conditions and restrictions designed to protect and maintain said private street and to maintain the storm water detention facility in said tract. Page 3-DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS A. Each Owner shall share in the cost of maintenance of said private street. B. Street Lamps and Street Trees. (1) Each lot shall have planted therein street trees. The individual owners of each lot shall be responsible to keep and maintain such street trees located upon their respective lots and to replace or replant any deceased or dead trees at the lot owners expense. (2) The street will be illuminated by two lights or lamp poles installed in the utility easement area. The cost of energizing these street lamps shall be paid by the lot owners equally through the homeowner association. (3) In the event any lot owner fails to keep and maintain a street tree on the owner's lot or fails to pay the lot owner's share of the cost of energy and maintaining the street lights, the association may cause the work to be done or the costs paid and owners of the individual lot with the cost, if the lot owner fails to correct the problem within 30 days of written notice to do so from the lot owner's association. C. The Owners of Lots 1 through 6 in the subdivision hereafter called "affected Owners" shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on the second Tuesday in January of each year to elect a Chairperson and review the condition of the private roadway and discuss any maintenance needs and costs. Special meetings at other times may be called by the Chairperson upon not less than 14 days prior written notice to all lot owners. D. The affected Owners shall be entitled to one vote per lot in decisions regarding the maintenance of the private roadway,the election of a Chairperson, or changes to this Agreement; except, however, in the case of a tie vote, the existing chairperson shall be entitled to two votes. E. At the meeting held each year, the affected Owners shall elect a Chairperson to represent the affected Owners in all matters regarding maintenance of the private roadway for the coming year. The private roadway shall be maintained to a standard appropriate for all-weather paved roads. Maintenance shall include the roadbed, road surface, curbs, drainage, shown water deterioration facility maintenance, adjacent vegetation, and the maintenance and energy costs for the street lights for said road to the extent individual lot owners fail to do so. F. The quantity and quality of the work to be performed on the private roadway shall be determined by a majority vote of the affected Owners in accordance with Paragraph 3. above. G. The costs of road repairs shall be apportioned equally among the affected Owners on a per lot basis regardless of frontage, location, or improvements. If an individual Owner shall cause the roadway to be damaged, that Owner shall be solely responsible for the entire cost of repairing the road to the satisfaction of the other Owners within thirty calendar days of the damage. Any payment due from any Owner herein shall be promptly paid and shall bear interest at 10%per annum from the 10th day after it is billed by the committee or its designee to the member for payment. Page 4 - DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS H. The committee may, upon majority vote of all parcel Owners, adopt reasonable rules for the use of the roadway which are not inconsistent with the easement and fee ownership rights of each Owner. I. No vehicle or other parking shall be allowed in said private roadway. No gates shall be installed across the easement unless agreed to in writing by all fee Owners of the easement area and all easement holders. All Owners shall keep all of the roadway free and clear for vehicle and emergency vehicle access. J. Enforcement of this Agreement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate this Private Roadway Agreement, either to restrain violation or to recover damages. In case suit or action or request for arbitration is instituted, the prevailing party shall be entitled to all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, at trial and upon appeal. The Chairperson, at his or her discretion, may file a statement of claim with an arbitration service. In this event, the decision of the arbitrator shall be binding upon the parties and the fee for the arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties unless the arbitrator determines that the fee should be borne unequally and allocates the fee to a particular party or parties. In the event of a violation or attempted violation of this Agreement, the Chairperson shall also be entitled to recover all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees that shall arise from enforcing any provision of the Agreement, even though no suit or action or request for arbitration is instituted. K. Lots with Common Walls. Those lots within Esau Estates having approvals for shared common walls between garages on lot lines shall have reciprocal cross easements to provide access to the common wall for necessary repairs and maintenance at reasonable times upon reasonable prior notice to the other owners. So that lots with common walls will have improvements thereon with compatible appearance, the owners of both lots having the common wall must agree on changes to paint color and materials for siding and roofs. In the event the lot owners having the common walls are unable to agree on changes of color, structure, or materials that affect the exterior appearance of improvements on exterior side of the common wall, the owner shall be submitted to the Home Owner's Association for determination. The decision of the majority vote of the association shall be final. ARTICLE IV GENERAL PROTECTIVE COVENANTS Section I. An Owner, or group of Owners,whose property is threatened by a diseased, rotten, damaged, or overgrown or otherwise hazardous tree or trees, may make written application to the Homeowners' Association requesting that such trees be topped, limbed, or removed. After the Homeowners' Association's review and approval in writing, Owner shall contract to have such approved work after obtaining all required governmental, agency permits or approvals have been granted. The cost for such work shall be borne by the lot Owner or Owners making the request. Page 5- DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS • Section 2. Any construction, grading, and/or construction activity shall not extend past the protective silt fence, once in place, as approved by the planning director of the City of Tigard. Protective fencing must remain in place from the start of grading and/or construction activity through the period of home construction. Once home construction is complete, the silt fence is to be removed. Section 3. Property line fences. Fences built on or near property lines by or for any Owner of a lot shall be approved by the Homeowners' Association as to materials and color. No fence shall exceed 6 feet in height. Section 4. Exterior House Paint. All residences, fences, and ancillary structures shall be painted with white,gray, beige, pale blue,cream, pale yellow or other reasonably conservative colors compatible with the colors on other lots subject to these restrictions. No loud, garish, or unusual color combinations shall be used. Questions about the appropriateness of exterior paint colors to be used shall be submitted to the other association Owners for approval. ARTICLE V MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHT Each Owner shall be a member of this Association, and shall remain a member until ownership ceases for any reason. Ownership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of the lot. Each lot shall be entitled to one vote regardless of the number of Owners of such lot. ARTICLE VI ENFORCEMENT Section 1. Each Owner shall comply with this Declaration. Section 2. The Association shall take prompt action against any violator to enforce provision of this Declaration. In doing so, the Association may exercise one or more of the remedies that are currently specified in this Declaration as well as any other remedies that may be available at law and equity. The majority vote of the Owners is sufficient for any such action. Section 3. In the event that an Owner violates any provisions of this Declaration, the Association shall have the right: A. To enter the lot or tract as to which this violation exists and summarily abate and remove at the expense of the defaulting Owner anything or condition that violates these Declarations. Each Owner hereby waives any claim of trespass against the Association or any Owner acting pursuant to the majority vote of the homeowners. B. To enjoin, abate, or remedy any such thing or condition, including removal or alteration of construction by appropriate legal proceedings. Section 4. An individual lot Owner may bring suit or action to enforce these restrictions. Page 6- DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS • ARTICLE VII TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS Section 1. The Owner of each lot within the subdivision shall pay the taxes on all property within that lot. Declarant for each lot Owner hereby covenants that each Owner, other than the Declarant, shall be deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Homeowners' Association annual and special assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided, together with special assessments, late costs, and reasonable attorney fees, shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each lot against which such assessment is made. Each such assessment, together with interest, late charges, costs and reasonable attorney fees, shall also be the personal obligation of the Owner of such lot at the time of the assessment. Each lot owner shall also be responsible for one-sixth of any and all tax assessments made upon Tract A. The private street parcel. Section 2. The Purpose of the Assessment. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used by the Association to perform maintenance and repair provided for herein, and to pay the expenses of the Association, including the following: A. Expenses of maintaining the easement area and common driveway. Costs for normal and usual maintenance of the easement and costs of repair of the easement damaged by natural disaster or other events for which all holders of any interest in the easement are blameless shall be shared equally. Those holders of any interest in the easement that are responsible for damage to the easement because of negligence or abnormal use shall repair the damage at their sole expense. Section 3. In the event that an Owner fails to pay an assessment when due, the Association may, after 10 days'written notice declare the defaulting Owner's entire assessment immediately due and payable, and interest shall thereafter accrue at the rate of 12%per annum until paid. Section 4. The Association may bring suit to foreclose the lien against a residential lot, which foreclosure shall include the lot, the graded buffer tract, and the ownership in Tract A of said Owner which shall include all ownership interest of the defaulting Owner in any property subject to these Declarations. The proceedings to foreclose the lien shall conform as nearly as possible to the proceedings to foreclose liens crated by ORS 87.010, except that a lien for unpaid assessments may be continued in force for a period of time not to exceed six years from the date the assessment became due. Section 5. Action to Obtain Money Judgment. The Association may bring an action to obtain a money judgment against an Owner for damages or expenses for the Owner's breach or noncompliance with the provisions of this Declaration. The Association may bring an action to obtain a money judgment for unpaid assessments against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same. An action to recover a money judgment for unpaid assessments may be maintained with or without foreclosing or waiving the lien securing the same. Section 6. Collection Costs and Fees. Owners who fail to pay assessments when due shall be obligated to pay reasonable fees and costs including, but not limited to, attorney Page 7 - DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS fees in connection with the Association's efforts to collect the delinquent or unpaid fees, or to enforce any provision of this Declaration, including those incurred at trial or on appeal. ARTICLE VIII GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Waiver. Failure by the Association or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. Section 2. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Duration; Amendment. These covenants, conditions and restrictions shall run with and bind, benefit and burden in perpetuity the Property, all Owners and Occupants, and the lessees, invitees, and guests of all Owners and Occupants. Prior to the turnover date, this Declaration may be amended at any time and from time to time by Declarant, provided that Declarant has obtained the prior written approval from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and United States Department of Veterans Affairs. Thereafter, this Declaration may be amended only upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds or more of the Owners. In no event shall an amendment under this section change the boundaries of any lot or any uses to which any lot is restricted unless the Owners of the affect lot(s) unanimously consent to the amendment. When the Association adopts an amendment to this Declaration, the Association shall record the amendment in the real property records of Washington County. Any such amendment shall be effective only upon recordation. Section 4. Declarant Not Liable. Neither Declarant nor Declarant's successors or assigns shall be liable to any other person for its enforcement or failure to enforce any provision of the Declaration. Each Owner and Occupant, by acquiring such Owner's or such Occupant's interest in the Property, agrees not to bring any action or suit against Declarant or any successor or assign of Declarant to recover any such damages or to seek any other relief(including equitable relief) by reason of any such enforcement or failure to enforce any provision of this Declaration. DECLARANT: C---- - .40,..,..4-4.4._ &-----3:.,...,.,„._, J ES CASTILE AUDREY CAS 11146 Page 8- DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Washington ) On this k"l day of T{ , 2002, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State, personally appeared James Castile and Audrey Castile, and acknowledged that the said instrument is his/her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute the said instrument. OFFICIAL SEN. LIE CASTILE NOTARJUY PUB SIIBEG014 COMMISSION SNAUG369700 26.n' 6 )) Notary Public for Oregon MY � My Commission Expires: HI (15 4 Z-6/ Z Z CC&Rdeclarations8.13.02 Page 9-DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 1/24/03 Conditions Associated With 11:54:53AM TIDEMARK Case #: SUB2001-00005 COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By l SIDE YARD SETBACK None NOT MET MS 10/12/01 ST 1. The applicant must develop lot#2 as an attached unit to the existing single-family home on lot#1 or remove the garage on lot#1 that would otherwise be in violation of the side yard setback requirement. 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINTS None NOT MET MS 10/12/01 ST 2. Provide a plan showing the building footprints for the proposed lots. If attached single-family dwellings are proposed,the applicant must provide buffering and screening according to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix). 1 STREET TREES None Met = MS 1/23/03 BMK 3. Submit a plan showing street trees to planted along Tract"A"and the remainder of the site that fronts SW Greenburg Road according to the size and spacing standards of Section 18.745.040 of the Tigard Development Code. 1 TREE SIZES None Wet` MS 1/23/03 BMK 4. Provide a plan showing the size of all trees located on the site. If there are any trees that are 12-inches or greater,the applicant must provide a tree protection plan and mitigation plan for trees 12-inches and greater to be removed. Tree protection and removal plans will be reviewed and signed off by the City of Tigard Arborist. 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE None mkt— MS 1/23/03 BMK 5. Pay Traffic Impact Fee of approximately$9,040.00. 1 PUBLIC IMP.PERMIT/COMPL.AGRMT. None Met 10/28/02 BR 10/28/02 ST 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the public and private improvements within the development and any other work in the public right-of-way. Eight(8)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 1 CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS None Met 10/28/02 BR 10/28/02 ST 8. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. 11 construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application,and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 1 PRIVATE STREET None Met 10/28/02 BR 10/28/02 ST 9. The applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private street shall meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street. 1 PROP.WATER CONNECTION None Met 10/28/02 BR 10/28/02 ST 10. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 1 PROP.PRIVATE STORMWATER DET. None Met 10/28/02 BR 10/28/02 ST 11. Final design plans and calculations for the proposed private stormwater detention facility shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Brian Rager)as a part of the public improvement plans. 1 ADDRESSING FEE None Met 9/11/02 KJP 9/11/02 PLN 12. Prior to approval of the final plat,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$180.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church,Engineering). 1 GREENBURG RD.ACCESS None Met 10/28/02 BR 10/28/02 ST 13. The final plat shall contain a restriction that states that Lots 1 and 6 shall not be permitted to access directly onto SW Greenburg Road. 1 PVT. ST.JOINTLY OWNED/MAINT. None Met 10/28/02 BR 10/28/02 ST 14. The applicant shall cause a statement to be placed on the final plat to indicate that the proposed private street will be jointly owned and maintained by the private property owners who abut and take access from it. Page 1 of 3 CaseConditions..rpt ,. ESAU E4.- TATEs I ,r.�!'�._r r V 1 'rT i7 �•IMPROVEM '„ NT PLANS of_ 1.7100.01,wwww,,,'-eLr'S ztR--.,-:::.i•:-... 41,,,, _ 4. IT17,'4,_g-i:-:t.:";',,:f 'A..e. :.:1:?..-"-i,#_---,., /::-1:,_-:''r:If:•i ri 1,::::4:4';I:::.:4:,,7 1 1 • is \tea , ds ,.e.' :a i - .1 I Y�-r - r f'- r•- I LT A1}IEIICHE ,' ` R+���^ �`pp 1 `�\ / 1 �; ''ice 1y1�o _ � moo\ 0 r IJJ �rJ ..ri`i✓ � a I .__.e ;� I 1 I S i----1 1- z �- -- _ _ I ---- IA VICINITY MAP _ I J I I Q N.T.S. I I w �. 1 ��ppp ----' LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 Sly 1/4 OF SECTION 10 \ I I TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 TEST, 1fILLA E MERIDIAN JGARAGEGEl/ CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 4 l 1 Q i F - I f I �\ory I I 1 TAX MAP: 1S 1 35CA 1 I �1' I w I I I TAX LOT: 1403 & 1500 I' 1 ��O I I I - ZONING: FRONT(MAINRDLOT SIZE 3,050 SF) ( 1 TO BE REMOVED I I REAR YARD 15� ♦ SHED CORNER YARD 10•I EXISTING ( I SIDE YARD 5' (20% RED. - 4') _ 6� (APPROVED FOR LINES LOTS 2/3, 4/5 AND 5/6. LOTS 1 AND 2 MAY BE DEVELOPED AS ATTACHED UNITS. I HOUSE OTHERWISE ZONING SETBACKS WILL APPLY.) I HOUSE (TO REMAIN) ce U W I I ul t 1 ' EXISTING USE: TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS w tL � d V P=.1 1 1 2 ��o° 2 �b ,b PROPOSED USE: SIX SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS o :Q I I �, r _ LOCATION: 11430 SW GREENBURG RD. i��� I C+O TO BE REMOVED I I A 11450 TIGARD. OREGONBU9 223 r Z ::: N V I ZERO LO7 LINE f i SHALL e�roS,Rkll"ON tcLI 1 I ENo„ 0 o"S I I . Rf\T A(+C 1 I I EXISTING I U 0, fss 2Mo s f�-- I HODS f= Reba W�RffjyeU,"-� (TO REMAIN) F. \ ® 1 0) HARRIS-McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES, INC. ....... \::-: \- Sy, ft"--p ® ^-. ` I ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS '// 12sss S.W.I HALL BLVD. \ \\ I N ,j �' cT 1\\ \ \ w�n --AV� �`q�fss rD•p��`` 1 (n \ .----1 \ l�� �Q � \ �oNTO E 1 \ \\ \ `al O 1 \ .--cif ` -,- + TEMPORARY MARK \ \ \\ \ \ \�BURC RAJ BENCH MARK AT THE CORNER OF SW GREENBURG RD AND SW 87TH AVE. \ \\\ .- -\ TOP OPERATING NUT HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 21318 FEET. • \ \ \ \ ' `\ OF FIRE HYDRANT BASED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY BENCH MARK/167 \ \ p ^ ELEVATION 176.36 \ \ \\ \ "� O ` _� A BRASS CAP IN A MON.BOX AT THE H DAKOTA ST \ \ \ � OF SW GREENBURG RD.AND SW NORTH DAKOTA S1 I \ \ \ \ i �` Sheet Index \ ----1-I \ \ \ \ \\ \ Title Sheet 1 of 5 d i \ \ Grading Plan . 2 of 5 1 1 \ \ Street and Storm Drainage Plan 3 of 5 I 1 1 I M Sanitary Sewer and Waterworks plan 4 of 5 N N Standard Details 5 of 5 O N $ I l l f l l l l l l l C 0 20 40 E SCALE: 1"=20' DATE REVISED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 U REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: DESIGNED BY: m P R� L Mc. SUBJECT TO REVIEW ESA U ES TA TES AS SCALE SHOWN � HARRIS-McMONAGLS �°���I NEf `��o - ASSOCIATES, INC. F ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 821 r R.K.W. SW 6/UE/VBIA6 ROAD CG-CVR 2 2N0 SWUM REVSIONS a1Y OF TIGMD w.LMG ,a2 =ON CHEZICED JAMES CASTILE & AUDREY CASTILE SHEET 1 1S1 SUBMITTAL REVISIONS arc cc TICARD w.L.Mc m/oq/oQ 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD. Q TIGARD, OR 97223-6267 ,,Ap.,2.,a0 J.R.H. 8100 SW DURHAM RD. TITLE SHEET 1 4 PL-V• DESORPTION SUB. APPR. ME PHONE: (503) 639-3453 �4t R. TIGARD. OREGON 97224 FAX: (503) 639-1232 °"'E PHONE: (503) 314-8042 VICINITY MAP REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION EXPIRES JUNE 30th. OF 5 2003 11/09/01 N 1i .4 �i5 ydj \CIA 1 a t-o• �, 11 G sf?/ N ,,,„ /1/.� lx., W ' b ii, �,f/ \ 100 :..; S S � L� b 1 V b 1112 / �r•i;, / p lE R W A` _T . J 111 :►:iy >< .r •�.:.�a O il'Z1 li li ill q;� 111 �' '�.i:?`%i:.:; r •• Z al el 4 i6 �\,o\� 11 Rol s•as w� '.'':R..„' oa• l p .i. or CLEW AF RUN Ca r-RNA WAR b.'-app' P E N. S E •in EROSION CONTROL NOTES: r lue. 'I 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION/SEDIMEMNTATION CONTROL I TREE LIST moo•MK FDA It at FAY<Y MO IXP EII RISWO . YIfl / DURING CONSTRUCTION(ANYTIME OF YEAR)PER THE"EROSION PREVENTION AND (X - TO BE REMOVED) j SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS TECHNICAL GUIDANCE HANDBOOK"DATED FEBRUARY I • 1994 AND THE CLEAN WATER SERVICE'S DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, I X 85 LAURLE--CLMP -'? R&O 96-44,CHAPTER 8. I X86 HAWMORNE12 I < . I a' ! . j gi L- 87 CHERRYI2-16 E.,,... / > 2. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE 1 88 CEDARS f ,v ` " � Z AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN(E.G..:SIZE AND LOCATION 1-- 89 CEDARI B l � ^r�fii� � • �, _ \ - O Z OF ROADS,PIPES'RESTRICTORS CHANNELS,RETENTION FACILITIES,UTIUTIES, ETC..) --1 X 81 PINE36 I 3 . a 92 MAPLES r J "F i '''':::'''':::•-:.:,-::. :.,,..:...::\� Li_3 E a 3. 1 1E IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION.MAINTENANCE, I 93 MAPLE14 I r :::::- � • REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE I 95 MAPLE28 I----J I- NOTES: 0• '' CONTRACTOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY THE CLEAN 1 111 CEDAR I6 I Z moms i` / WATER SERVICES(C.W.S.)AND VEGATATION/LANDSCAPING IS ESTABLISHED. THE r - 93 92 I 168 DICID.CLMP _-_- °rx .• • DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE AFTER THE PROJECT IS APPROVED - I_-- 189 DICID.CLMP W I Ei1Gdl 2.-0" . UNTIL THE LOTS ARE SOLD. I •\ -" x 180 SPRUCE-22 I I (n ~AURO ROCK wer a 4,-�, " J I 0!0104 G 10 MOEN/ ry 4. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING UNITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY ' I X94 ./ 89 � I $21-901.PLIW010. FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD,NO J 'co',-- ' L--_-J DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE FLAGGING SHALL - •• •....•._... _...-. 1 9 :\/" 88 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Dotal Drawing 4-5 SEDIMENT FENCE Detail Drawing 4-16 BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR FOR NE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. I hi..j%;f.,` 1 I i 5. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH r r,.7+.. : I w .ALL CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES,AND IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT ... _,_ •' 4 PROPEftiY UNE � RN a WED alas mw SEDIMENT AND SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER NE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, I '� ��may M°`aµ0 r� r <¢ j` - 1. FF.213.01 8 ■ 21 t�,.r 169 1 I I I TABLE 37 Fwate OF DE�aar,oR ROADWAYS,OR VIOLATE APPLICABLE WATER STANDARDS ' �;" t 2AA� EitOSiOIYCONTROLMATRiX _ t . •v � „ ` V ( . N COI us SUIRRVLWON AND LARGE SITE CONSTRUCTION ,e' ,6. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE `sue f - '861 �\ / ryi/ I SEOCIC I :<.� I ! I��I'I I 41:ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS.DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD,THESE ESC FACILITIES ' 11 1 v ' / ` ffiTS ST oes ru13s I I I I I l i tJ ' l 'n4 91 4V.8 1 /`I• G" <10% <IS% G0% QO% <30%X50% +I! 4,,1SHALL BE UPGRADED AS NEEDED FOR THE UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AND TO ENSURE o C Q. I I THAT SEDIMENT AND SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT LEAVE THE SITE „1, -`�" D / I.faivdGD....b.a.m.O -., , r..r ---.. _' �� 1.3.1 X X X x X X X' GG e I I ( ) ..I�... e. 7. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR AND ,� ., .,{ -m- / ad (: FF.ZI Ot t� MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. °�j 5 1 �p.� `� \ f: /� N. a I I �...................3 x x x x x x x CATCH BASIN AREA DRAIN -..•; + t 8. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM \�■ t' o l' .,--../.;--,...-,-,,,-;:• -- I F •4J'"% /' ,� 3.UaduO.bed toffee.bordiWrhed A(2.) OF ONCE A MONTH OR 1MTHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. -- UW r wt•` -_1 / I ( 64 ' Ku(Soo 33.5) i i' .Y. i •Q ^111 1 / I I Wawa raw installed o■mount X X X X X X 1 9. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN 1 FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE �'� t` `•;%; ` o ,; / LL 6 (rpEde�(S.e]37) (so0) (130) (1001 (509 (u9 (?S)•WITHIN A TRAPPED CATCH BASIN.ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE UNES SHALL BE I *� tOO ' ' / -1 1 \ ., . -',...a•ff., 12.8* a ♦ / f- �, 1reeDp TmeAreptardltldsxda d s t. d r I :; FLOW CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT LADEN +) x I°o / / 2 I .ramdldhesvark.Itse.(Se..33.tq ;+' `- WATER INTO NE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. ..... \ d f / I rb IL 8 i , 1"'....._.; WET wErtYtoalA.r4AtnarT o z/ ( / 1 FF.212,9>� I a�aDbeh.ait overlap of bogs. P g-.....i _ 'x _/ / I t �! • • • • • 1 I Y iI f 10. STABILIZED GRAVEL ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT NE BEGINNING OF I 1 I I '�� (S.e 33.6) -T CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR A DURATION OF THE PROJECT.ADDITIONAL $ 6 �y f ' �° / I I. `' .. PLAN VIEW MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR N {'_ tK N I I �.rot.+nn►maaoo„r(SeG 0 0 0 0 0 0 �." THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 1 CQN F'1+.212.4t \x: ", ` a ,Nt p�, 1 r '� 33.7) .+7 ll 1 R(/ I �. -l l t.Enoio.twotas with mien(Sea 0 0 0 0 0 .0 11. STORM DRAIN INLETS,BASINS AND AREA DRAINS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNTIL PAVEMENT -- / i 'Sii O€j k7A�V (/��� � t- __ r t11 6� ''`' =-' :01"'\\ / "'� �a 1W/-J� I x \ l 9.6a.d pLEdD Ilex Dwa(Ste 7.19) 0 0 0 0 0 • •SURFACES ARE COMPLETED AND/OR VEGETATION IS RE ESTABLISHED. �+8 ( - Qf� Go � I - __ .�� � "^C=y CR� �,"�,w+ _'"�C,-... _/ \ I I la Soros trip orFood(Sao3.3.10) 0 0 0 0 0 12.PAVEMENT SURFACES AND VEGETATION ARE TO BE PLACED AS RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE. p gyp / I 0 w! � � 4 O `�Qf�'1^f ` Sf./M �O ( I , \.. 1� I 11.Raeseeh6r!f cover at ...:a 13.SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 1 FOR EACH PHASE OF �T �� �"�`1 1r p I I / :`: Ledso*.Fir 3rorovLaweie X X X X X X X DITCH INLET CONSTRUCTION. 0 t_ C x /I I/'/ \\` L� maue.(See 6) NOTES: NQ -.- •� ..-\. 1.ADDiTiQNN.MEASURES MUST BE "-- t$Q IFS? CQ• - ``< 4` J` 1.,��I// 1': 1 I . .., X.BrMwes CONSIDERED DEFENDING ON SOIL TYPES. 14. IF THERE IS EXPOSED SOILS OR SOILS NOT FULLY STABILIZED FROM NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH 4 s ■ l8 >r/� s"A:rmrwBru..•.Eoaer.ai.re s EAQFxTER BAGS SHOULD BE SFAKm �/ 1v. LT2 -Cm// FF211.Of� irs♦ t 4.33.7 AND 33TECHNICAL GUANCE HANDBOOKFOR REQUIREMENTS. fie'k \ ° \ 1 NM la: [i.o�,¢., s,p.wFi,e.wtamap.mrssc INLET PROTECTION Dstd Drawing 4-24 15.ESC MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE DEVELOPER WHEN VEGETATION IS FULLY \ Q�O��C7A as 4/46,��14- -` CONSTRUCTION \ t TYPE 4 0 8q / '••.,.„„ Al ---ENTRANCE ESTABLISHED. \` 7JI-1'74°'S 44�4/�L!����• `` S �5 \\\ I.24 16.ESC HOT UNE PHONE NUMBER IS 844-8444 \ -.\ \N 71.1 �CQ ' >%r r;• ��/AfENT 10•pV f\` \ 1 17. ALL ESC MEASURES TO BE IN PLACE AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE \ \ 2\W I 1 \ 0� i USA INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY WORK. \\ \\ �/ `°��Y.sp. \ �18 GRADING NOTES: \ \ \ \ �' to-------- R \ BENCH MARK 1: THE ROADWAY CUT AREAS ARE TO BE BLENDED TO \ \ \\ N e \ \\ F.H. WET WEATHER EROSION CONTROL SPECIAL MEASURES: THE ADJACENT LANDS TO FORM A GENTLE SLOPE OF 4:1 OR FLATTER.AREAS IN EXCESS \ --- 4.,+ N r6 Q/0. ��� \ '� B R N N A( ' -- _ 1. THE"EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL TECHNICAL GUIDANCE HANDBOOK' OF THIS SLOPE SHALL BE HYDRO-SEEDED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM EROSION. -- \\ \ G \T'--?.'59. 0 - 4 �� IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE PLANS. ANY COMBINATION OF THE VARIOUS MATERIAL PLACED ALONG THE EAST, VEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY UNES SHALL BLEND - & 4` R 3 q• W 74 fit „ MEASURES SET FORTH THEREIN MAY BE EMPLOYED TO MITIGATE THE EROSION THAT INTO THE ADJACENT LANDS TO FORM A GENTLE SLOPE OF 4:1 OR FLATTER A MINIMUM \ \ \ Q ��� OF 5.0'FROM NE PROPERTY UNE. - \ \ \ Q 4.08 MAY OCCUR FROM SEDIMENT LEAVING THE SITE. 2. THE ROOF AND FOOTING DRAIN UNES FOR ALL OF THE LOTS SHALL DISCHARGE INTO \ '' \\ - 2 ANY GRADING MATERIAL THAT IS STOCK-PILED SHALL BE COVERED IN ACCORDANCE THE STORM MAINS OR THRU THE CURB WEEPHOLES. \ \ •\ , WITH 3.3.3 SEC. 5, 8&7. 3. ALL EXPOSED SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 10%SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH EROSION ____ \ 3. THE HOME BUILDER SHALL FORM A SWALE ALONG EACH SIDE AND/OR REAR LOT UNES AS \ \ \ \ BLANKET(SEC 3.3.8). STRAW MULCH OR WITH TACKING AGENT OR MACHINE APPUCABLE TO MANAGE THE DRAINAGE AFTER THE HOMES ARE CONSTRUCTED AND FINE `� ce GRADED. - \ \ \ .-` PUNCHING(SEC.3.3.7). I \ \ 4. ALL DISTURBED LOT AREAS SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN AND FINISHED WITH A SMOOTH _ o DRUM ROLLER TO PREVENT PONDING OF SURFACE WATER. I I I LOT 5 ` `� i; L J \ ` CQ 5. ALL FILLS ON LOTS TO BE COMPACTED TO 90%MINIMUM. (DIRT/ROCK T-180) MAP 1S 354D I \ -�' N ALL ROADWAYS TO BE COMPACTED TO 95X MINIMUM. (DIRT T-180/ROCK T-99). I I' o mill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIW11111 ------f---D V SCALE: 1%.20' U # REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: DESIGNED er: rD 14471.49 L SUBJECT TO REVIEW E ES ,+~s SHOWN g HAR.IS-MCMONAGLS ,4b 0,c t NEf 4o ESAU ES TA T V _ ASSOCIATES INC. sI �' R �i TRACED CRG ENGINEERS-sU ASSOCIATES, 82t R.K.W. $W OR.EfNB11/Q ROAD CG-GRID 7-.1 2110 SUBMITTAL REVISIONS CITY OF 11G.RD W.LMD. m/)a/02 l -•= JAMES CASTILE & AUDREY CASTILE - "' 1ST SUBNrITAL REVISIONS CRY DF TIGARD W.LMD. B/ae/� 12535 S.W. HALL BLVD. OREGON CtfG((ED 8100 SW DURHAM RD. SHEET / CESCRIPIES TIGARD. OR 97223-6287 `rtr me. _ J.R.H. GRADING PLAN sup A are PHONE: 0 ) 639-3453 OREGON 2 FAX: (503) 639-1232 aR PHONE: (503) 314-8042 E.S.C. STANDARD DETAILS REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION EXPIRES JUNE Jong 2003 11/09/01 QF 5 J I a STREET LANDSCAPING TREES 0 10'P.U.E. TRACT .A, "• 10'P.U.E. I I ( I * r * w 12' 12' (EMPLOY 3 DIFFERENT SPECIES) z 'd oo ►1 M ro C� DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANE `1 (PLACED AS SHOWN 4 N , tV N) , STREET TREES CO I o 2 o 1°N 4 I°N I�N 3'-° --►---�-3' I .' 212 H $ 212 g" g� CITY OF TIGARD n , ,.. ._ N ° CURB CURB 27G APPROVED STREET TREE LIST: U q t .-a$? _+ I I w4ko - OREGON WHITE OAK 212 0+$ +o� 1 > g z N - + 2% 6" NORTHERN RED OAK c o N EWi 212 °+ m° N EXISTING 29G dal V3►c 5 /GROUND I I a 6 O ti 3° '\\\\\\\ ���������-. CITY OF TIGARD WILLOW OAK 1 m 1 1 I 1 o EXITING GROUN) (CL) D1L. 128 EASTERN WHITE OAK * S • `•. Z .•.' s BLACKGUM N CI <a <V r EX.GROUND RIGHT b. rr._- �:.- .. CURB & GUTTER COMMON HACKBERRY of S' �ii~ ' NOTE: DAWN REDWOOD +I - ___ _ _-___I__ - _ •,,�- ___•. - 1 FINISHED y' NO PARKING ALLOWED ON EUROPEAN BEECH r __ � �■ -- -- _ �� GRADE EITHER SIDE OF STREET LACEBARK ELM ` ' ----- - --•-<y - 208 1 r I 'B' BACKFILL I 'O' I 208 30' WIDE TRACT 'A' HONEYLOCUST EX.GROUN FT CLASS PRNATE STREET SECTION w D LE x W ,� SEE OUTLET DETAIL G N NO SCNE c� Z TOP OF CURB PROFILE z FULL W.S. 206.90 208 D I I o I 1: 208 �r_ 4a 2" CLASS "CS A.G. BASE LIFT o �j� ��4i' 1-1 2 CLASS "C"A.C. SECOND LIFT EVBUC UTILITY NOTE: V 4 -_ N / "" _ GUTTER LINE a l 4"WTR l 1 33 5 LF 10" P.V_.CC I_ \� 2 3\4'(-) BASE ROCK 1. PGE TRANSFORMER AND CROSSING LOCAT IONS E _ a w w 77.0 JF 38"C.P.R k 4 7" 1-1\2"(-) BASE ROCK OF SW GREENBURG RD.AND SW ESAU PL ARE R = o ao_ SHOWN FOR RE EERENCE ONLY III T = a S=0.0020 5=0.0060 W Ik E sPECI�FlCE U..zx ocAna�NS�PGE FOR s 2 _ `�I _ I SW ESAU PLACE PROFILE d 26.4 LF PRIVATE DETENTION P PE PP.IVATE Al� ��p C 4 HORIZ.: 1=20' TRACT 'A' - 204 = 4 - �'� �'��__moo A = VERT.: '=2, PRIVATE STREET V = °Z I 5_0.0038 d, 7t•INFI:::._ • : I" ■:1 ,a :r L - R ( ) MH's FOR •-∎ TO HA/E SHEAR JOINTS S E 0_ 204 1+40 204 0 o PER PLUMBN, CODE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T - N N a U 0 20 40 S 2_ vi 4i a o z Z ■- Z --- I I I HORZ.STALE ° o C = HOW.: 1T=20' 0 0 I o 0I o °I END PAVING I tj _N A E VERT.: 1=2' c ri M o o ° STA 1+62.22 INSTALL (PVT.) S1IjiEET LIGHT I I a s 44JJ ri in 8D' L = NN-Nh o FG.210.23 ONTO N ° TO MITIGATE GLARE ON I ° a N a a E _200 w w W W W 41 Ij 200 END CURB ADJACENT PROPERTY cl 0 unlnulnnlnn nnlnnlniilnir - _ + / STA.1 62.22 END CURB I I BEGIN CI�RB I' R 4 0 20 40 I . TC. 10.49 STA.1+62.22 I STA0+36. 5•J o Rw., �,iI, ° HORZ SCALE ORIFICE DATA tI TC.210.97 TC.209.89 WITH 4 / NO. ELEV. DIASINCH.) _._......... ._____ O I 203.70 2.2 s,. � BULLNOSE END AT BACK a s INSTALL (PVT.) IAA-3; �. 1 ;,, I PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION NOTES: RIM.208.8t 3 206.90 12, - 1 ;_ ( OF DRIVEWAY APPROACH vI STREET LIGHT i STA1+36.9'` I. Cur��� 24' 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TIGARD - - Cws.DTL150 A IALUM.CAP , 30 R �-INSTALL SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS,AND PUBLIC WORKS CODE. r RIM.210.4t I I /{y 12 OVERFLOW RISER 1+2f- ION C/L EA �� STREET SIGN 0 BEGIN CURB Rfp e'S STAO+29.87 2. STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE C.W.S. AND FULL W.S_206.90 4 CONNECT RISER TO WALL I 23 10 �� ISTA1+57.22 I I •qS -"Cc /{y :•@ © TC.210.27 WITH•:s CITY'S STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. � WITH STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS ` ; i -^-�.�: - (C. ;, I 3 FROM NfCfsS/H, ?09� 'OW2p 0 � BULLNOSE END AT BACK 3. TWO 4" WEEP HOLES SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH THE CURB FOR EACH 2 171 STAINLESS STEEI.BOLTS p f :' , } PP I I �MSwR :•' "3�,+ �I 93g T -, OF DRIVEWAY APPROACH I��. 03 7 EPDXIED INTO WALL 11+12 UN •• Q ♦ 54' 10'- LOT WITHIN TWO FEET OF EACH FRONT LOT CORNER. 36' DETENTION PIPE i I °S f S ♦� A LF _ 4. ALL RAIN DRAINS SHALL DISCHARGE THROUGH THE CURB OR INTO THE EMPTY W S_203.60 ' - L� FLOW I 5 I �2% PGEa I I C _�:�(� ''• ♦��♦ O�?O9, ?. Uf a 12 PVC 1 . 4 PVC @ •7�i�! 50, PRIVATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. a' , 12"x 12'TEE ..-'.'"-:.,:.::!.:=..--. 1 i I ,n, e "�t� �♦♦♦ S 5. ALL PRIVATE STORM DRAIN LATERALS SHALL BE 4" P.V.C. PRIVATE ;j `' ' . _ -- I w Q ,:. I I 6� TC.209.61 Q�20 �� �r 4 - f STORM DRAIN LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE 12"CAP • Z GUT.209.11 9,�9 �� `;0' S� WITH THE UNIFORM PLUMBING AND BUILDING CODES. SUMP EL-200.60 A ,.`'.r`2 ` 1 ,�� r- -.,=t-=,- I_ 'I° Ian W1 MH.A-2 _ .. I I IV P s CO RfMOV �5'p Gam , QH•?lp 6.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED; CONTACT CITY INSPECTOR; ;'I ri, o-t' I STA.1+03.4 W ST%o Olt R0l' �095� • W I�� Q t u A CXJ �� (639-4171), FOR A TIME AND PLACE. NOTIFY MATT HARRELL, - =A=2 0+85 ;1 iii I°o - I o CWS.DTL010 I I A G R RN-,4).-R@ �� 6• ����4 CA'. THE CITY INSPECTOR 24 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. LYNCH_TYPE : _, 23 LF • -I RIM.210.1t P'� F �/ TQ ■0�.� " °I + I Z • 1: ! 0+76 2 16 I �� £N 9 0 Sl0''Fvik c02p9 49 `s's 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD MANHOLE OUTLET DETAIL �.5�°gas 41" �., 4 o} _ o ° SA, LOCATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH OAR 952-001-0010 TO OAR 952-001-0080. . `° ( 5,=;,1"-'11-' 27 LF R 60" WQMH.A-1 W/,9.0 LF 8-DIP PROPOSED '!"` !4"PVC �° 8. STORM PIPE SHALL BE CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE, C.P.P. OR _,. I /� INSTALL US POSTAL SERVICE . 1 ° 1"=1 O' O A D FOR ALL 6 LOTS. EQUAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY. (C.P.P.) NO - UTILITY•X4ULT a 0 I 9.ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. a Z I TO @E©Ord,. n 11 gv }a L�1. -"- - - PPL I ( �11� Rf Bq,P/f uJ STREET CONSTRUCTION NOTES; a r �wN �c es •WQMHA-1 it o 11 I I STREET LIGHT CONSTRUCTION NOTES: a n Y PP •�� .S,0>L Tf0' STAO+28.4 N I 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TIGARD o ° MP'?ZS`CWS.D1L515 fi0"I-','. - '� I I J¢C PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS (PRIVATE) SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS,AND PUBLIC WORKS CODE. m \ •;;,== 5�rAND Cl 2 RIM.209.9t -1 b 10 n L" - �S TD�` �, 0 1 LIGHT TO BE 25 FOOT, BRONZE, ROUND, TAPERED, /�? 90 fXCXIR@ �'!� � f f ?u• �� 8� �� DIRECT BURY, FIBERGLASS LIGHT POLE WITH A 100 WATT 2. THE DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL STREET LIGHTS PER THE CITY OF TIGARD , / R fP `\E ,� ,, SMT1 f � � r �, - 240 VOLT, HPS, "TOWN AND COUNTRY" STYLE LUMINAIRE. APPROVED P.G.E. LIGHTING PLAN. 44 -� / (N �4 Z \ 4 �I�t' � . I ' 4.14111111)i D DIRECT - SI0 0 0��1,S,. ".: PP ii illpv 1 4 4� ' - i QUANTITY REQUIRED: TWO (2) STREET LIGHTS. PRIVATE LIGHTS SHALL BE METERED SEPARATELY FROM THE PUBLIC 4 P.V.C. A ' ` _STREET LIGHTS. ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REQUIRED. TERAL ss DRro s, 0 'A(k $�.,' : • ' ALUM• 3. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS REQUIRED; CONTACT THE CITY INSPECTOR IE.206.90 IN �i� 30 CREE�QU`` •/S,y��� ,'_�r ��I 13`. ON C/L;. I STREET SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: y1 .�� 1-Op At R \ :,SQj j r..� `S TA0+36.95 I(639-4171), FORA TIME AND PLACE. NOTIFY MATT HARRELL, * • ∎� WQMHA-1 6R �) !;/ zesi-`,ON D e THE CITY INSPECTOR 24 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. •Q' STA0+28.4 ---. REPACE SIDt iVALIL ��,`'••', ....S , 1 1-EAOI 2-FaCH ,ry/ pJ�'G0 CWS.DTL515 80" RG R AS NECESSARY - // ? ,�•. •� � •\ � DESS ��%• I `/ RIM.209.8t \ OAO �Ni s D ��`��,� ?. '0 pU�O�r° :' I I 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELDFj-•� GqS -� ��l•l25 • ijr f 0-•, �Ll�.i�ti ��50•\ E r I LOCATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH OAR 952-001-0010 TO OAR 952-001-0080. 4)(0. �� \y, pe f I T A �''°--r__ ex/ST .,,, +DS fS BUBO RD I I O OUTLET (24'x6') (12'x18) 1 GAS ■�\ /� 4 /. ;,, IX.wW X a A CITY TREE CUTTING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. ���Gq \ � � ` � f ToIREAIN I 6. WORK HOURS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: MANHOLE HDETAIL T Gas z 29* H� //� @��! ` I FIRE HY MARK W14-1P • w2 BETWEEN 7-AM AND 9-PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY �� �I FIRE HYDRANT BETWEEN 8-AM TO 9-PM SATURDAY OR 9-AM TO 9-PM SUNDAY - Si N SEX MAILBOX � � 4"IETTERING 1-EACH 2-EACH (NO WORK IS PERMITTED DURING THE HOURS OF DARKNESS) G I >••7 (Rf_hi01��` co/ ••; I 7. IN ADDITION TO THE EASEMENTS SHOWN, ALL FRONT @ �;� c. OR�3 44'\ -\ `S© ESAU , (2*'x6') (12'x18)• LOTLINES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO AN 10.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR 0I �'�'@U �- J' a. / E,t jew 1 STORM DRAINAGE, SANITARY SEWER, WATER SUPPLY, LANDSCAPING, DRAINAGE LATERAL.TABS ai \ �\_ F X �� 1 G, a;<a LV 31ET1ERING 3'LETTERING SIDEWALK, AND OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES. LOTS MAIN IE 1AT IE. LENGTH SLOPE FlN.GRADE DEPTH �' \ ?09 9*•"�'f Sr 00 28+00 - - PRIVATE 2 C 5 8. AN OVERALL BLANKET EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES SHALL 1 208.90 207.50 27 LF 2.27L 210.50 3.0� _ �- �= ,1�.7 BLUE RAPES MX LETTFRN?DSO W2 O ii EXTEND NE PRIVATE ROADS FOR SANITARY SEWER, 2 205.20 207.00 27 LF 6.7% 210.90 3.9 / c STORM DRAINAGE, WATER SUPPLY AND OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES. 3 205.20 207.00 27 IF 6.7% 211.10 4.1' UT1l1TY VAULT J \ \ `� ' � Z � 4 205.30 207.00 23 LF 7.4% 210.70 3.7' ,� 9. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERGROUND WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. 5 205.20 207.00 23 IF 7.8% 210.50 3.5' \ \ '� / \ N UTILITIES ALONG SW GREENBURG RD. MAY REMAIN ON OVERHEAD SERVICE; 8 208.90 207.00 18 LF 2.0% 210.40 3.4' STOP 30•x ,) (12,x16) N DEPENDING ON UTILITY COMPANY PROVIDERS. IF SO.A FEE IN LEIU OF STORM DRAINAGE LATERAL AT 2%MIN. I LOT 5 �I \ \ \ R WILL BE PAID BY THE DEVELOPER. - 0 20 40 1 S 354D 1'=20' � � � � � 3 C > 5, I . I� R1-1 O W2 0 u IREFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: HARMS DESIGNED BY: S �q+�0.1.°001,444°14,,PQQ .LMc. SUBJECT TO REVIEW ESAU ESTATES AS SHOWN. Z UTILITIES REIMATK)N RED. ASSOCIATES INC. f i TRACE B; OREGON LAW REQUIRES FOLLOWING THE RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTTUIY ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 09le, R.K.W. �W�7 8 �7 R��D 0G-S R. NOTIFICATION CENTER. SAID RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR.952-001-0010 /09 �/�---z= JAMES CASTILE & AUDREY CASTILE SHEET 721 211E SU8I 0T L REVISIONS CI Y of ncaeo w.LMc o:/az/m THROUGH OAR 952-001-0080 232-1987 IFTM1�U HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT QOM OREGON"' (503 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD.1ST SUNDIAL REVISIONS CITY OF WARD w,UN. m/02 THE CENTER BY CAWNG )5 THE RULES,CONTACT THE CENT . NOTE: DAMAGE TO UTILITIES SHALL BE TIGARD. OR 97223-6287 `ttr m•,aI6`� J.R.H. 8100 SW DURHAM RD. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 3 Y R DESCRIPTION So& APPR. a1E CORRECTED AT THE PERMIT HOLDERS EXPENSE. PHONE: (503) 639-3453 '4E3 p Nlpa �� TIGARD, OREGON 97224 FAX: (503) 639-1232 PHONE: (503) 314-8042 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN F REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION EXPIRES JJNE 30w 2003 11/09/01 CF 5 WATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES: N . 1. APPROVAL FROM NE'MALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT(T.V.W.D.)IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO or �' - - RECENING A T.P.W(CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC WORKS)STAMPED APPROVED ,�/ N. ON CONSTRUCTION PLANS �i \4 2. E CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ONE SET OF TKW.D.STAMPED APPROVED PLANS ON THE - k( . - \i4 I I I- j z_ 1 w w CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES -�► 14----E I-^-- I --- W I I o (0 3 CURBS MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO INSTAWNG WATER MAINS WITHIN NEW 1 I w I mil m ri suBawsloNS �Ili, I j i z g d$ j^4. NSET UUP A PRECONSTRUCIION MEE1 NG TTELEPHONE 639-4t71.CONSTRUCTION TO ". 'r t I ( 2122 3 t 1 e 2 x,�gj 2 xdi x 5_ _.__ - L_ 212 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH A.WW.A.(AMERICAN WATER WORKS r'`,'44-,..1-f" I I I I EXISTING GROUND ASSOCIATION)STANDARDS AND NE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. 4 : 6. ALL WORK WILL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY T.V.W.D.AND TIGARD BUILDING DEPT. `-' _.. MHA 3 I - ^ � 7. ALL VALVE OPERATING NUTS SHALL BE WITHIN 36'OF FINISHED GRADE,OTHERVASE I -1+71 I ••�' ;� STA1+75.6 UNE'A' I� - ` � - - - VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSIONS WILL BE REQUIRED. I I I •---.,,;` 31 LF I � • CWS.D`R.�010 8. POURED CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS OF AT LEAST 8 SQ.FT.OF BEARING SURFACE ARE - -:- ; 4 PVC RIM.2i0.6t x TOP OF CURB MIRED AT EACH TEE.CROSS AND BEND LOCATION(SEE DETALS FOR MIN.BEARING :.. ri I •--,-4,`, '?4 0 Afq/NI'. • 6•. . -... `3 208 I,tt��? PROFILE 208 p I I I -'Tlf- 9. A 2%4'x6.0',PAINTED BLUE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN FRONT OF EVERY WATER I 4. SERVICE LOCATION,AND REMAIN THERE UNTIL E WATER METER IS INSTALLED. -I I 5 11450 SW GREENBURG RD. li IA I 4"PVC : •, I I o ' TIGARD. OREGON 97223 _ _1,- t0. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FORM E CITY OF TIGARD PRIOR P.V.C. " ,.__ I t. `-.}= `: 119' FRb1 MAIN.. �� z - ?`..... 1+34 I o �EX.12 WTR 4 11. T.V.W.D.WILL INSTALL ALL COPPER SERVICES AND SAMPLING STATIONS PRIOR TO BLACK ' ::`, 31 LF ,, w1 I I 'a I I Z 3 0 1 CLASS 'B' EACKFILL I TOPPING OF STREETS. WATER METERS WILL BE INSTALLED BY T.V.W.D.UPON INDIVIDUAL I ''`' "PVC cwi, _®c:.. �t , �. REQUEST AND PAYMENT BY OTHERS(OWNERS). ALL.WATER METERS CONNECTED TO AN /I ''I a t i �r .- §W • SACgla,IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST HAVE THE PROPER OREGON STATE APPROVED BACKFLOW PREVENTION NOTE• '• I D.. °°I f+19' I rb 204 I z w CLASS B 204 DEVICE,MINIMUM OF A D.C.V.A (DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY)INSTALLED ON NE -'I •+ EXISTING WATER M A- IN THE . .. 19 LF l -, 123 T� - -- PROPERTY SIDE CF NE METER THE BACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED 5 EXISTING DRIVEWAY-APPRO• n D -4 PVC 2 I t) I '7 1 I o 3 x r\ AND TESTED BYE OWNER,WITH THE RESULTS FORWARDED TO E T.V.W.D., I -' 1- z • a EXTEND METER SERVICE'LINE. BEFORE WATER SERVICES CAN BEGIN d NI R ( - I 122.3 LF 8 P Y.C. D-3034_ I 4f TO BE EXTENDED BY T.V.W.D. Iz �+ 1 o !' t °.... I I 1-, I§o o EX.15"STM_\J OPERATION OF VALVES IN THE T.V.W.D.IS PROHIBITED ,sz COST`OF THE EXTENSION TO BEI `11 . ' 1- E- • D 12. I 58 THE DEVELOPERS RESPONSIBILITY. I� 01 ' 178' FROMIuIAIN °I • I CO j --- I 53. .-LE a - - - EX.WM i REMOVE D/W APPROACH AND ' Imo I6- I• ,1 -1- . 11.1 �� REPLACE WITH CVRt3'AND.SID NALK.I- Z LI 9 I w EX.WM _ - - :..::.t. I 1 S.o.o�s I . '+' �`(TO REMAIN LOT 6) I M I _. - b t- I • ` S 0+$4 1430 SW GREENBURG RD: I I 200 z z Q_EX.4'SAN g 200 `\ 431PVC I j I> ; P..OREGQN 97223 4 - row z T- 5 z ~-- --- '�� ` •ate■�� Tom a :1i7pli.icTIG,Lft, I V = n u1 - �, \� 1c'�+%ti a� ��\ PL :- I • +---1 E = W O� i O O p o��`� \ J__ 11 rat -2 . . ':r;" 1 i T t_3�J I N• N 1 ```` / •. eIST \\--, ` I i R N I N • ��//yo WM.� STA.0+53.3 LINE W = 4i 4i 4i 1+00 4S �� - fX(.�` SiO � $,o • I��." CWS.DTL#010 - .... i S 2 -- - \ S ` ,?..v -`E.Al /No �`�k` ,, / 1 RIM.209.7t..- 1 C C HORIZ.: 1=20' � W G o°• 12.0'gip � `��.''�-• V'-(q fk��, EXWM A _ vERT: 1 2 SA ITARY S PER PROFILE T LiN A� OpN �f�� (TO REMAIN L•, 1) I E _ 188 1 I I \ F N\FR ppfRMNN FOR Sf. /3i�/ &P� o P..... I 0-z ' - t 98 C4S � S I TO 7- COT es VG F r r T I I T I ` \ i,8. / T/ONS --` S �!:;-, N S 1 I 0 20 40 Th G,� 6'4.1y�V R (� _' S ,, ` FS� �' -.- -. I HORZ.SCALE SANRARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION NOTES; \ ,q�, o ∎ , ?.,1. \ EX. M I SERVICES ` . - �Of S p FO SF / Ex/S - ■ OF SITE 1.ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WfTH T CYIR \\ ,T q ``��. 2c?c / �EW \\ -4` I I EXISTING THE CLEAN WATER SERVICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY(C.W.S.)AND \ , ----. \' .., c �- d M ` C(Re�/,� `� I FIRE HYDRANT $q(�TT/ y SEWER LATERAL TABS THE CITY OF TIGARD (C.O.T.) STANDARDS AND SPECi TIONS. GAS Q ��`� Op \_ ` 2. MAIN UNE PIPE SHALL BE 8"AND GREEN COLORED SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE \ GAS \ /R g 37 LNG ��`T/NC 1 . LOT# MAIN IE.LAT IE. LENGTH SLOPE FIN.GRADE DEPTH . - ` ` ? / _� _ 4'PVC CONFORMING TO ASTM D 3034 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PROFILES. ��\C CwS 00 vNF CS ���/` ` 1 202.02 202.36 18 LF 2.0% 210.75 8.4� 3. SERVICE LATERALS SHALL.EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM THE MAIN AND \ �S •` R/M 2 p9�,1 0 ���� `` I 3 202.48 202.82 18 LF 2.0% 211.95 8.3' 8"FEET"INTO THE LOT. THE END OF EACH LATERAL SHALL BE MARKED WITH A _ 2 x 4 PAINTED GREEN, EXTENDING FROM THE INVERT TO A MINIMUM OF 1W0 "�� EL NO "-L`` 4 202.57 203.15 31 LF 2.0% 210.75 7.6' FEET ABOVE THE GROUND SURFACE. (SEE DRAWING 170-SA) \ - aisnNG 8" �� T`` --.--._ 6 202.08 202.68 31 IF 2.0% 210.32 7.8' 4. SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT A MINIMUM GRADE OF 2%. \ \ C`e \� SANITARY SEWER LATERAL AT 2%MIN. 5.ALL MAIN UNE SEWER SHALL BE BALLED, FLUSHED, MANDRELED AND AIR TESTED >•-o' r PuE "� AFTER THE BACKFILL IS PLACED.A T.V. REPORT WILL BE TAKEN BY THE I uuuuununuuuIIIIIJ1111111111, \ `_ CONTRACTOR,AND REVIEWED BY C.W.S. C.O.T., BEFORE PAVING THE FINAL UFT t--V-V--1 I ---------- \ \ '� OF ASPHALT CONCRETE / LOT TO BE 0 20 40 6.TRENCH BACKFlLL IN STREET AREAS SHALL BE MADE WITH 3/4"(-) ROCK, -I SCALE: 1'=20' \ ` ` ` COMPACTED TO 95%RELATIVE DENSITY,AND TESTED. .1 SERVED ..� � LOT 5 `- A, er�%vI T r MAP 5 1 35 I ` 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. 1 / 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY COMPANIES FOR OFFSET LATH J THEIR RESPECTIVE FIELD LOCATIONS. PNRT.ENE 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER A SET OF PLANS SHOWING THE PROPERTY AR AND LOT SEE NOTE N. PUMBEON FACE N WHITE EXISTING GROUND (CL) I ( AS BUILT SERVICE LATERAL LOCATIONS. PANE ON FACE Of CUR! FJ,� 10.THE ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE ONE SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO C.W.S./C.O.T. r B. I z I - - Th.- 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE C.W.S./C.O.T.AND THE ENGINEER 24 HOURS ----Al! - PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. zrwrr� ....�,.,.,. _ • ,, �, a 12.ANY GROUND WATER, SPRINGS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE °,;%" zo PIPED TO CONNECT TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ow-- \ CUSTOMER SIDE 208 0 I 8 F 1 PROFILE o I I? 13.A SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO BE OBTAINED, FROM THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT, PRIOR TO CONNECTING STRUCTURES TO THE ELEVATION • i '• V 4 _ m an V o 5- GUTTER LI r) SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM.7.NOTES: 2 I!' � �I E _ cx g c,3 0 N oL w C 1. A I FT OFFSET LATH ON P PROPERTY UMW R _ 3 0 a PRNATE 1" CE UNE METOe S 2- I I gi .., CURB STOP C - HDRIZ.. i=20' Ig " R _ WATERLINE PROFILE c COPPER TURING A = VERT.: 1•=2' L = C, .;.. . Jl TYPICAL NLT10N Jl 7 NS. . E 0 204 1+00 ci is 0 20 40 Sc HORZ..SCALE 1;1 EOM SGNE -1 REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: DESIGNED BY: SPED"ate, L Mc. SUBJECT TO REVIEW ES AU/ / C`S t/� TES AS SHOWN ] Z](s-McMONAGLS �4► �G1NFf �D f� /"7(J c r1 V I ASSOCIATES, INC. y� �i. A TRAGD) - ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS �f-/ R.K.W. JAMES CASTILE & AUDREY CASTILE swc �vB�ne4 ROAD CG-SAN 2ND SUBMITTAL REVISIONS CITY OF'WARD w.E 11G o1/n/BP 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD. OREGON SANITARY SEWER AND SHEET 1 1ST SUBMBTAL REVISIONS CITY GF 11GARD XL*. D1/WS 8100 SW DURHAM RD. TIGARD, OR 97223-6287 'tA 7E00 . J.R.H. TIGARD, OREGON 97224 4, REV DESCRIPTION SUE. NPR. LATE PHONE: (503) 639-3453 REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION FAX: (503) 639-1232 EXPIRES ENE Jotti.2003 1/09/ 01 PHONE: (503) 314-8042 WATERWORKS PLAN of 5 1 wuf mus AIO COWL 0. PLAN EXISTING DRPJEWAY- 1 ru UDC a AT LEA4T � MUTT WE 01 MATCH WM!GRADE tr N W0711 DRAINAGE BLACKOUT J�� DVN CABS OR PVC) 1. ° PPE W/oOUPUNG WRIES' stx NOTE 4 116. II I\ ®1 ''!I'-I'-I'M al11;•% 1'BATTER _ _ + SEE NOTE 3 MRCS LAMM.RP[ =ads MN N R� i\ ROAD r- 1' 1'R.i.7.r.. 5� A I W PEEWIT lLlt■pJOli ,...= �. •12' ��� NOTE J __I.--:--:- . ••- ARr MAN r , +�74 Lam' 1111=1 IL ''1OEYWX w7WN 2r FROI ET 111.N M 1-011 t a u1ML `''• •j Ti II/ 30J MA%A I OTE! &KY:Rw cui ��111 -.MEN W casalRl MN AM O-4 S -� PLAN -.TIRO 111.110 CR R.HALM IA. Y rT 1 FCR USE ALONG MEDIANS.GUTTERS MAY BE REDUCED W7N PRIOR Lrou • APPROVAL FROM THE Ott ENGINEER. -CH=NW a 7 W.NOW Cr -_2 CONCHEIE 70 RAVE A BFENGNO STRENGTH OF 3000 PS6 AFTER 20 OAK 3/4 1FDRO (L.W R URO CR ALL � •..-- W Arra mom or FACE gnaw K AT DO C'I.A7ERAL MW •� • N ROM GI ATRCJO lif OF JM1AJIM 3 EVANSON JOINt 2B y -R0CR 010 VATRCt Y RR SARART AID t L 1 A TO)BE PROVIDED: STREET !7 TOY WJIWG4.WARE RAOR W CVMA.BC. COLOR 09E Mr. sm. TAR EACH PONT Cf 2)A7 EACH COLD JOWL TANGENCY OF DE CURB. -I.YY H.v f[AIOIN4 TORE r (aREDI•-SAIAAR) y�'I/ •I// 3)AT EACH SDE CF NW STRUCTURES a AGGREGA1E -1Q ERA.N.WD HARM.SRE Z �' 4}AT EACH END OF DRIVEWAYS /4'-D") CCIPACIEO -an9.1W W N wm Wei sFJ ar PPE s 5)AT LOCALCNS NECESSARY TO LMT SPACING 10 45 FEET. SECTION A-A Y a IJOI4 k� MOO-- • & MATERIAL TO BE PRE-MCDED.ASPHALT IMPREGNATED.NON E%TRUDNR SEE NOTE N0.4 E� �/TU'+E 1MTH A 1HICKNES3 CF 1/2 INCH. V c rAWLAOL LLT1DIb f/ 4 CONTRACTION JOINTS i A SPACING TD BE NOT MORE TXAN 15 FEET. NOTES: 7r YA7014.1 411.1 1 \ fLJO & THE DEPTH 6'THE JO HT B AU.BE AT LEAST 1 1/2 NOES t. CONCRETE COIIPRiESSVE STRENGTH SHALL BE A MNUWM OF 3000 PSI AFTER 25 DAYS �, W r LRt FROM TCP OF • B BASE ROM Y-0 OR 3/4'-Q NS COMPACTION. BASE ROCC SHALL BE TO W MANN. ,�� e SUBGADE Of STREET STRUCTURE a 4•N DEPTH.TNIOHEVER IS GREATER. 2 C1RB JOINT SHALL BE TROWELED MITH A MN 1/r RADIUS ALONG BAP(OF CUR& a t ''�'...aJif++4• S. DRAINAGE BLOCCOUT-r DIAMETER PLASTIC PPE: I EXPANSON!CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE 1/2'PREMCDED ASPHALT IMPREGNATED `F`� • �% 1 s_I�L-T••". ... MATERIAL OR EQUAL E%TENDWG FROM SUBGRADE TO FWISN GRADE 'II, II C.,»f• '' rrPPR...`°" YZ'AhT1AL N;°• A Y I.D.PLASTIC PIPE W17H COUPUHO. � �'� 6 DRAMA.ACCESS RETOUCH E)OSLNG CURBS SHALL BE CORE DRILLED OR CURB 4, r X/'10 GA MESH REQUIRED FOR COMMDROAL DRIVEWAYS ONLY• it OF 3/r�COPACID •ti, r 44_ -. ,IyJ,CR Ta Ww r Prs•0029 SAW OUT VERTCALLY 1I•EACH WE cr DRAIN AM REPDIAREO TO FLA.L DEPTH OF CURB. Am wTRA< C. DRAINAGE ACCESS THROUGH NEW CURBS SHALL a PLACED A MD..CF 2D' ( .L L ' \�.' 109.1 01AVEI. AND A HUX►1W OF 3.0'FROM PROPERTY UNES `J-'.'1';.-.11 W+°1I+M rr rw ELEVATION oar.. W IC. A+. 10 tCMR �_- . CURD x GUTTER P.I.■ -� P'"IRt:r STANDARD R.. STANDARD MANHOLE Vf� I� SERVICE LATERAL unified yiti 0 Urifiser:reged �.°J....a'•�`YI�s°� r:••••••• NN 126 MY .41 win OF RIM NLe 1NR DRIVEWAY 1 42 P .r.�r w. .J.aw DRAWING N0.010 CRAVING N0.170 8.--1 _ I�N�TRIICT i/1'70 -.4,.. �arA.....• A A 3 4 RADIUS liuPP DRIVEWAY APRON .N: IMN.3'.147.\\ EXISTING PAVEMENT DIG OUT REPAIR SAW OJT OR MONO A .4•• A VE1T[IGL = ;�• .••_, n 1 j %; .�}:.�r .. ) ��II II I''1. :}'t' iHLETE -'�.' 11U, NO �- .”.::...f.:!....,:•,...,..:, • SI Ii1 ...L��i:tom_:. r OF 3/4,-0.CoAwcIEO AGGREGATE r44 `•+,''••'A.C9 :�.::;;' I CURB AND GUTTER •bir: . rc AGGREGATE BASROGL SE NOTE 4 • ` . .-t U r TC C I'V PLAN �� =.IiIL=J1=1 . PLAN VIEW ACCORDANCE WTH 3/4 RADIIJi HIP•70 C '� COPACTED SUBGRADE B CURB DRAWINO NO.22R 91WCIJI WN 2' TOP 01 2. FROM FACE OF CURD-7 N- / CONSTRUCT DRNEtYAY APRs ATOP OF o LOCAL STREETS 0000 ` j AC-r CASs'C ASPHALTIC=CRETE. o 0 .$ J,e .:••2••' AB-4 (1-t/2•-0')AODREGATE BASER= li Taal WEEP \ R "E 0 �j j j//j_j�j � •�.�,1 j•i, ••Y-r?.. OR X••-"� �j q1 q ABLE 1MTNLlIOIr CAP P i{4.:'.tr 1,,s.'' l�� �.I*}=': AC-r CLASS'C'ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 0 i 1 ••< P < RHRO a ova=N0N • . Col. :P pc •`•, -1,11 OF y/4•-o'CO PACTED NIGREGATE MWOR COLLECTOR STREETS NLJE7 i -I I gnLiY Vii{?�•% STANDARD CURB lestateiess. . I i 9•: f AC-Y ASPHALTIC CONCRETE. - .. AB-4'(t-t/2'-07 WlECAIE BASEROCB 1•: i -' CM T EVIL RANDS xv TOTES: AC-r CLASS'C'ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ' e ■�L,, DAN r trop AND 1.SANCTA'THROUGH GUTTER PLATE SHALL BE MADE AS CLOSE RI �TI Rf�f�il w DW►To R oETe1MNm In TO CURB FACE AS POSSIBLE MAJOR COLLECTOR STREETS •' �' N7L OF OIJIIBT IPPR 2.COMPLETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNLESS AC-r CHAS!'C•ASPHALTIC CONCRETE. SECTION A-A SECTION B-8 LI'N i W WINN TOM wr PR DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. All-s•(t-1/r-07 AGGREGATE tTASmoat NMI nom Eva 3.WHEN STRAIGHT CURBS ARE REMOVED.A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET CA7O1 IA1aR 1D IE CCfTRUC ED I ACC ROA Ira(AM 0-475 ,.. '\j, OF PAVEMENT FROM THE FACE OF CURB SHOULD BE REMOVED /TEA.IEOVRWD FOR CA1T`JI BASWS OVER•t TO FLOYf.IIt: •;J,;T`aP• ��c.?{�:+"'��' :' AND REPLACED. NOTES: /r r.'.; i.:4:10.X.`**$1 4.WHEN ENTIRE GUTTER PLATE IS REMOVED,THE EXISTING 1.JCN11 To D TALL AID SWELL r Cr>/r COIPACTD BASE MATERIAL SUMP W,.UME REQUIREMENTS PAVEMENT SHALL BE CUR BACK AND A D MONOLITHIC CONCRETE PRECAST CATCH SAM SECTION A-A MOLE rAYLY IIWDDJLAL LI LP/ACRE BENCH SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE NEW GUTTER TO PROVIDE L ASPHALT RACED N MAX!LEIS EA01 COMPACTED TO MI MK IMAM MALL L40NEA TO Lt r MULL VARNA RE7DENSVL .0 OW= SUPPORT UNDER PAVEMENT. 3 ...OJT BALL IR TAC COATED TM IMAMS AMS ASPHALT EIEABOL IEWiCKT]E11T W S MBAR memo ASIM AM15 ORAOE MI OR WELDED WIRE IRLLNO A 091.7LOALANNRTEM. GAD IK/ACE 5. AFTER CONCRETE HAS CURED.SEAL JOINT. /MBM L NeI 11... .R1CNR GUTTER & CURB I�fied WATER QUALITY unified ""°'°P"°"JtMS 4 QUITO o� �. """� �� rAVOwENr D�o� 0R.6 INLET CATCH BASIN u ■I MANHOLE U A aiNncY NM mYR.N. I.aw FOR DRIVEWAYS 145 Otry *MS w (CG-2) MR CP MOE 1M ..ii NMa 1w AND WPM I V2 DRAWING NO.226 DRAWING NO.515 wOW Oar.HA RAL n S OR MI b mow .At wmXL 28rx26R CAST-IRON R`NONO car td NON Bat awT } I- T PROVIDE ROUGED GRATE WITH BICYCLE UNGARO WHOM I TRAP LiD OR GR.FO0 4"MIN.CLEAN-OUT BARS -`F =>t- k If i1111 -iI ,I TC.209.41 CUR: room CRAM \��`� oh.. ii STREET GUT.208.91 STREET :� . °1L"JI. ,o.a.Ai �.z Y;: Ji 12R -. �► _ .....or NICU. WI IP°,� 8R PVC SCH 40 OR \% 17--... ..,fr i�,� DUCTILE IRON 45• BEND ; :/•v.v.mumi rw ` rw , -•• 111 tom, _ MIN. IIW / .:• ...; 0��O`i>yN i'>. D.i. .Iii,!1i�i���%. 24'x24' 10 GA OUTLET A/+G`r-1" F ill ',j•1� OR 1 PATE IE.206.91 OUT ; A COATED INSIDE ?c Op. .,, T X29 \ &OUT WITH ASPHALT PAINT .s.. W. • ur-4 NOTE SURFACING AREAS_ SUMP.205.41 1.c 2. JOINTS TORE TACK ND SANDED.ATED YAIHCOMPLY B 1MWU5 ASPHALT EMTULSON.ARD DRAWW0. ��QG'PO XC76 OCIIOKE ENC.OPTEt WW[MICRON MO r.Re P CONCRETE PPE tg LYNCH TYPE CATCH BASIN a '4 AM..A=in NR, NO SCALE d CU.•.��WAp.'c.I�NJIf I.J.a TRENCH N.. STANDARD CLEANOUT UrA-1111::am V tIMrB Via MCI 1.1 w @A 1 80 DRAWING N0.150 n 4 - cO u REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: DESIGNED TTY: 01 PR Ito W.LMc. SUBJECT TO REVIEW AS SHOWN HARRIS-MCMONAGLB ,�\,,YLGtNf4rq do ESA U ES TA TES 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Ar 621 DDSS ENGINEERS-SURVEY01tS l��t--= JAMES CASTILE & AUDREY CASTILE SW�7RAfJfNBGlRC7R0�4D 2 2ND SUBMITTAL REVISIONS CITY OF TIGARD W.LMHL O)J)2/G2 OREGON ococED 1 1ST SUBMITTAL REVISIONS Off TIGARD W.L110, m/Ile/of 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD. LAT81:!- J.R.H. STANDARD DETAILS 8042 E REFER T O TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION wins JUNE 300IP 2003 11/09/01 32 SUB2001 00005 ESAU ESTATES SUBDIVISION -- _ __ -- -- - -- --.-- --- • ...., ____ --r...—ff_, i EXISTING DRIVEWAY - — -- — — L _ __ 1 MATCH \MOTH & GRADE I - ._ _ _ clx I , 1___----- _ -411 VW UNE l\ N C.) I _ I k ;Co) sw '41-•;.4. -_, -,.. , ,*0 . ,,,,,, , curl cr -Ac.\‘4,--,,- 8- 9 LH 1- 1,.. ' f-----— VARIESid v.-- SEE NOTE 4 I )., -- - - --- \\V (b6) f SW NX r___ _ _ _1 iir ,-- 1 G—,14 t ,______„ V---') 1 H _ J I I "4 1 Glier-S TA'Y ;li''.a4N,, als' N-1 _ _ ,__ SEE 6 r., D----- NI 8 „y,,,7- _ . r r .1.4...--j) „.... ....„ L..- -- -- 5'tm IN NOTE 3 r i =...„ .. NS.44er) 24 '' I SEE NOTE 2 • Norm 't.-----\ 1:4c 4 7/15-:•Ics.i:lf;.1/-::1 ''a.Q""1:C 111 -:1:;;51: 41::: 416 ,, SIDEWALK 0 I - --,-,_,,- - 1 ---1--- --a- ----__i ------- - ,AC3 -11 - ' 1 I 7,, , u I I 1 .,,,,,..,,, ,o,, "‘ I l'o:\4iii?.041,4,:m, 11--' ,LK,vel_16::E.. 50::::11:1/t '... iNe '--c,i 6S--f A -4- ,...... ,4„, , F.„.. il It: 6 30' MAX 6 \\./ rr..., ____. ir3 II ril 1 1 _.,_______,.. .d11---- -Pd. ' ,. ___ 1 I r-f,) MIN i -11_,,,..e.. - --t,°) - _ _ — - ___ _____ ____ _ PLAN_ ___ _ -- ,,- 0 _ ____ _ _ _____ ___ _ __ ______ _____ _ ,\\., ...44., ,N 3/4." EASEMENT I f,.-, -., • - c,---1----, -- ------ • . ,;14. f 4,1 pubt ' •-, 'k Lli , : 174tfiA sti-r lit 3 l', 0.) 1 _ _ —1 -- — -- -- -,1, - - s'el ,--4 • --.--- , I 111 MA = _I ' 0 0 7'- STREET i % ta r _ ___ ____ _____ ___ _______ ____ _ ____. _ ______ _ _......_ _ _____, 1 i 'F_ACCI,1 sr \ 'c\u-'•1,,,,--i ) ,,,tv-6€1,[ tr- -1 tA ir, ! t,,-ik , • A 4 Meglill° -- --- --- .---- -----1---- 4 10111111. CS 14------11 I 8 ' -------2OF AGGREGATE - - - - - - -- - - - r _ _ -___ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (3/4"-0") COMPAC TED . -‘-'4;z1,---?_,---- .- ,i.ti....- - -'1.-,•‘, ' -- ,,-',-,..," 1) -''' c •'' - ---i - --, --'1` _E_C T.M....A:A 6* X 6" 10 GA MESH _ -- _ SEE NOTE NO. 4 D 0 . , . . NOTES: I l _ _ _ i _ — , r 0 (-----0 1. CONCRETE COMPRESS NE STRENGTH SHALL BE A MINU MUM OF 3000 PSI AFTER 28 DAYS. I 1., ____ __ ....,_ _ I 7- VICINITY MAP i 2. CURB JOINT SHALL BE TROWELED ihA TH A MIN 1/2" RADIUS ALONG BACK OF CURB. 1 1— r:1 N- 3. EXPANSION & CONTRACTION JOIN TS SHALL BE 1/2" PREMOLDED ASPHALT IP,APREGNATED I N.T.S. — _ ___- -- -- ---1 [ 1 0) i M ATERI AL OR EQUAL EXTENDING FROM SUBGRADE TO FINISH GRADE. I I I I 4. 6* X 6" 10 GA MESH REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS ONLY. I r- --1 I. _ CO •-, I I I _ ----1.1 I ---, ,...., / -"C AF,PROvED SW: e's ) i I -_ i'- / /1_,\-) I :' ' AOUSTIN P. DV0043 - \ 04W-En140 DePARTICST • STANDARD - I L , oir CdAdEER DWG- Na / \j I I 4' 13+25 Vd.KALI.&Al l'441,"oilWav gnu --- I ,, 4-.2t,::_74 me 0 864...2-74gi, MARCH Ms DRIVEWAY 1 42 / \\,/ J caly Of TiGARo - / — -- — -- — -- ORMII APPROIOL WE K\\ I / .`-- i ' °,)1 -----#.,....___ e-3 1-t„----.,_ 1\----,. ----7---III 0S-- H-E DI\1111\ k......_ 1 i-- -., / ° --- /--- 1 — ---- --_ ___,.... -- 2 VI ..„ / --- A--• . . 7 81--' — — -I 1...0 / -..,„. -..., I rt: / / I I 54' I I 1 Ili "0.:1\5_°,,,, 0.111 .: - 8' / I _ - 9, 4., ,, : i . 0 -'..,,-;) -1, I . ..„, ..,„ ......_ ....„ GARAGE I-)I, 3 SF CNI ....„ .-., _ .00 4' 7.6' 2°' z"..,:iLl ,.....,. 7 1 / _ I , / _ f -0 ___:V ---- oi' 9' 1 -, ...,•,. NN Ra.5-6 PLN.6040 , i - - ---.. r .... I I I . • -...._ ,..• (S I NE 1 /4 SW 1 /4 SECTION 35 115 R1W W M , ,,.:,) 1 . ci,c); ______ / / \ \---) , i , _ o 00' ----.... c'y „ , _ , .- , 0 , i s 1 35CA AND 76, 78,4_, ,,.,, '.:'.0 cro L 3,6'9 F < 4 L:..t IL ;v114:191555 °ORR F7-3 L13 I . - IN ____ _ _ ,........ I— TAX LOT: 1403 & 1500 '-',..,.. Nt- II e.eN 2110 I fzi) r 4' -,,,,,,,,,,. I L----- I) ZONING: R- 12 (MIN.LOT SIZE 3,050 SF) _--7---_, -- EX. --- _ . -- FRONT YARD 15' „\ c) / • HOUSE • -- ',.,,,....,.4. „.:3,4-_6,59„..11s:**..-Du.G(PiaE4T0H_0RE UXE..Z.1 EAc,,,,I REMAIN) .....I 1 L, 7.0.4 le 4 ,- :Li!: I \4 I 1 1°)lc irlI I - ts-- REAR YARD 15: _(6. • al _.,0 4- --- w '''''''''''''- -----7::- _:---_ .s,, _I:- .II 1 I , - c ,....„,...,„ SIDE YARD 5' (20% RED. -- 4') . . ____ r. ch J . a _ L___ i 1 i .I cr 4--(1/ (1/ 1 47------' 2 ,.. r- -- • --"s---._,__ - 4' U...1 "--"- CORNER YARD 10' , 44.60'.:% „-i, O'e‘6,'', TO BE RE ie./) . --- X r) , 1 \ ---_ __------. (1'1,=1,„=1-'11:11, -......,..., pv i ixi [Li --...„. ,1 --,..,... -in •g .--_, --.., 6 -..._,...s to 1 ■ EXISTING USE: TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS -.), u-I ,--- 40 ZER( LO LIN iit' -1 4,275 SF I (..t) ---- .-.-- f 0 io t - \ EXISTING ----.4-, . / PLN.1215 OR (1) . d Y , ---, PLN.1955 OR o A.:,.?„ Ii PROPOSED USE SIX SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS t--- < GARAG 0 FIRE HYDRANT 1-.1-1 --„,...... -._____ ---____ S 11/ - ,,,., _ ,,,,,..„---„ti. /4„, _ — PLN.2110 1--.) • >. 17- u- I ch c13 _ ; < -,-- -----___ - -.--,...d 1,0„... ------- ------ . '-' -Z: : --,_ _ -----------------.. '.*-----/V • .- .- .. , ,ic. - kl/ i-, - :- (c) 0E-.5::).4.„„ .1-. ,r) t-,-, 1-- . cx EX. HOUSE 3' ' -LLAOXCAMTIAOPN:: 11430 SW GREENBURG RD. __ &/ , , , )G, I? - PF o•.613, 4 N V) LO (TO REMAIN) )-- 1 I L IL ij 11450 SW GREENBURG RD. - ,1. ---- — „ TRACT "A - I' 0 ,,.. -......„ - 1 1 I TIGARD, OREGON 97223 _ 24.00' 1 I -_____ --...,„ ..., 4 _ , \ Ir) CO I 1.-: I ..-- —0.- I L_ ____ -- __. -- ....,,,.. w _, it... h --- CP - _ --.. I ' 1---... 1 7 i 0 -----,_ ......„... 7- '" - , -„„ 5,104 SF I i 1 -.„...... 1--- -_, 0/ 1,1;- - i6A7,_ i k' I II,, o) .....,, _--......„. ...._ _., . ,v,4Ce---,.. CTh I f- ...1„.... --------___________,,,, ' 7 42 't.:4). • Sk-14-3)- , 80' "z tu -1------ -.... I ----- • '-....,,,, I ,, Lu _.,_, I 7 (/) .,t -----, -..„..., LOT 4 --_____________ ._...„,_ _ _......„..„ I I > W ..,,,,.. , , C) 1-- --____ -....___ -....___ ___. ,,,-..„, - - I EXISTING _ FIRE HYDRANT ''=' 16 1 11.1 -,....__ -...,,,,... ---,_..-,_ co * lic?. C.Y I I ----___, „, . '' ,-_,,_ ,, - ----------.• A. CI Z_____% [ -- ----_______ ....______ 1,..J --.--:- ..- , _,_'2 , ,2 ".,■,... , ''''''f, _ ,_ .-e. ''':' ''' ''..,„. ',. .. -,,4,. HT....* Z :'-'-k..W.'i-, „, „. , E ----,i,,r::-,,,,-------:----.--.-. ___ __ .. „,_ _ , ;,,,,,,x,..„, ,, .....„ , . /3 \ i .:.i.. . -..: •.: : ,:..:.-K: ____ — 1 r___ _ _ ______ -_.„... -----_________ . -----.. ,-„,,,„ ......, I I . ______ -......„... .......__ _ . _ .. -...,„. 2” CLASS "C" ASPHALT I L ,i___ --_-- _...., ,-,z --------2" 3/4"(--) LEVELING ROCK I _ _..._ _____ __ -,-, -6" 1 1/2' (-,) BASE ROCK 1_ I , -_____ -,......... --......., --_____ _ ,-___ _ ,-:-:;) _ ___ -..... _ ...,_ -...t. --- - - 15. 15' TYPICAL SECTION I — ---...__ ......,__ . FOR TRAC r *A" L _ _ ___ _ LOT 5 ...,__ .......„... . ,,_, _ _ I MAP 'I S A 35(t D NOT TO SCALE P F----- _ __,...... ,„.. II _ _ „... ____ ..._ 30 0 15 30 60 ,-, IL — i :-:-. _ _ 1 I h-_-_-_r—t-----r--r---7----- - - -7------,----- 1 I _3 • I I 1-- SCALE: 1 "----=30' < -- DESIGN: SCALE. - -- ------- —--- - — - --- , _________ SPENCER VAIL JIM CASTILE PROPERTIES ___ _____ __ _ 4505 N.E. 24th AVENUE W.L.Mc 1 "--30' q ______ _ _____ _ ______________ ____ _____ __ _ _ __ _ - - __ PORTLAND, OREGON 97211 8100 S.W. DURHAM RD. (....., DRAFTED: -_-- PH: (503) 281-8245 TIGARD, OREGON 97224 DWG. NO.. ------ — _ ___ EsTATEs FAX: (503) 284-5506 , CG-PR (2, S.O.P. . ,_ _ __ c-, _ _ _ __ - — _ ___ ____, _ CHECKED .,--0-,, SHEET .G, HARRIS—MeMONAGLE ASSOCIATES INC. - — - . _ ____ _____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ W. on L Mc . . ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS i REV. DESCRIPTION SUB. APPR. DATE , , ,. , .•ir -- — - --- ----- -- — - - — - - - -- - ' 12555 SAN. HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223-6287 ...-- REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION P : ,....., 06/26/2001' OF HONE (503) 639-3453 1 &NMI s•� ♦ — — - - - - - -- -- i _ in . . . /0? ,ill dC) .�.� ,,, _..M1,..-«_. ., .. .....-. r, ,.-.- r. _.,.,...-_. <., _ --.... .._..-. ,__} _u _ ..-,..- ., -"_..,,.may---,�., u�s� .._s.._- -. -, _. .. -_ ,. _ .. -.. _ ._r -- _ - ._ �-. -... --.. - .. .. -. -. _..-. _-_ -. -. -. .. _. -. _.-. - ... - .- -- - - _ - ---- -.... r_, ,.... ... _,.-.. _..., "_ ... .._._ .._._ ... -�. ,. ,., _...._,._,.- ,__ ,_._._ _ - - _'_ -- �, ._, � _w ,-. - 1- --_.--"'-"``•- _- -' - __— �.......... ..,"z.-_„ - 1 - - - 4 L _ _ _ j _.>. i __ __ EXISTING DRIVEWAY — MATCH WIDTH & GRADE OWNER/DEVELOPER: JIM CASTILE A PROPERTIES n , ,,RA, LINE._ VARIES SEE NOTE ` --' D�} - r � Y --- -\ �'ly N "x.17 - ,I1:1 - - \� ��:�_s,�-��� SEE ISO-TE .� ° fig � .. II - SEE -z 1 I 1 —1 ENGINEER: 5' MIN 2°l0 NOTE 3 I I , r r , '� SEE NOTE 1 I I I HARRIS—McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES, INC. SIDEWALK _ ._ __ .__ __ - ,.._> _ �••• _- - _,_ __ -= ENG#VEER --SURVEYORS - - - -� x� = L _ _ JW L _ �` .� 12555 F�AL�. BLVt� TIOARD, OR 97223-6287 )► _ { __ _ PHONE: (503) 639-3453 A I { 1 I FAX: (503) 639-1232 6' 30' MAX { # 1O• MIN _ .__ __ I Q __ __ _I r- -- -- -- ---) PLAN L_ _-.. I ,�,\' I \\/ 1 (9 1 I I . . STREET i i , A . • ....... -.....11... –7 .N. ' .\\/ I EASEMENT 2" OF AGGREGATE � _I _ (3/4"—0" COMPACTED - -1 _ I A- �� 6'' X 6" 10 G A MESH - F____ - - I I I I SEE NOTE NO. 4 I I 1 I r NOTES: I { 1 1 I 1. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE A MINUMUM OF 3000 PSI AFTER 28 DAYS. PREAPPLICATION 0# I 2. CURB JOINT SHALL BE TROWELED WITH' A MIN 1/2" RADIUS ALONG BACK OF CURB. r NE - SW 1 - SECTION 35 T 1 S R W W. M . ?, 1_.__. ____ ._... J ._ ._ _ _. 1 I 3, EXPANSION & CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE 1/2 PREMOLDED ASPHALT IMPREGNATED I �°' TAX MAP: 1S 1 35CA MATERIAL OR EQUAL EXTENDING FROM SUBGRADE TO FINISH GRADE. 4. 6" X a}' 10 GA MESH REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS ONLY. I I 1_-_-3L0 TAX LOT: 1403 8c 1 500 I 1 _ I :ZO:N:IrN_i____,.G..____:._________ R- 12 {MIN,LOT SIZE 3,050 SF} I I ! ! I I I �> �' EXISTING USE: TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS % I I —9111—, __ I 'n ILI I I PROPOSED USE: SIX SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTS 4, APPROVED El* NO SCALE .- aacIr�. � c dR r STANDARD I LOCATION: S W GREENBURG D Atiik t 3,a5 t . u e+�v�• O rr r t -DWG. N O ._ __ __ _ __I I 1 AND � �-»� I-w_ - --� , I l Y���� . f rti # ,_. ____ � I � � � 11450 SW GREENBURG RD. / ` /! ! I /SHE /I 1� �_ IGAR OREGON 97223 I �� -� __ J __ d. __ W I d tr:1) 'KAN/ ETT GARAGE `� ��_ _.�.'_.- N 3,121 51 ., , . 1V; (e'Fir--- p 1 / t3 if* `� t 7 � 15' 16' �, s� ` > 1 zo �` �� ate( t,. _ w __ 1 .� ♦ `n EX. L76SHED • t I --_.�` _ �-� HOUSE 1 4,100 s t H4 I I 4-.,_,,,,,....:._, '' EX. TO REMAIN i # I I I -!r d HOUSE 1 ;n °" O I 01 1 r b I ar . I C----c/ c) it O. CI> :'.; 1- x fli v 3,420 SF L I______ _ . . ...,, , _ .....„, _ , . W w TO, ',. .4 I _____ . _... Qf - 1 LE" l4 Uh� N___Alltigill Nt ' . =um c _. Nt EX. r.,1 LL, _ --...,_,_ -- --,„__ .,, '- -'' - ----------.---------, SW- Qtyp-- --- r --\----::— - ex ts,..) ! HOUSE -1,„ ______ ,..... , ..`.,., --�,, u (TO REMAIN) I 30.00' PR fP.CS I �4J t:r = 24.00' "'"! ,pit^ _; 4 ty �Q J 1 S C. I '•'',", r''"..�.____~ ` - ! � -` - _ 5,104 SF ' 12/14/00 ti ta ti . 4w, c\j t �` 0. I fiT 4 y w _ __ _ _ ___ -- __ I 11---- 1 \ `may �`''` -"`' SCALE: -=�'Q RECEIVED ._- s tai... ,..,, . s''. -`#�'�� .t •♦ r ..>_ �..> - - - - - .. - e "- e f* ' - --'' - ._ - ! ,♦ ,:..,, I { # # `�— °°�-. .� r - DEC 1 4 2000 r_,/, ,` •• . .• •. . _2, r> _' _' 1 # °�, *°�,. -`� 'max , ' ' _` _._ ° _ _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT s•= 1 DEV �T 2" CLASS "C" ASPHALT I I # # { �`` `� r: ° . . I rr Lu . -2 3/ ) LEVEL/ ROCK I - i ., `; - 6" 1 1/2 (-) BASE ROCK { 1 # �� U-i TYPICAL SECTION , I FOR TRAM: L ,�._.. a,_ _,_. _. I LOT 5 l.. `'_:=',.,.a. - _ ..,,_ y - MAP 'IS - .Nor o SCALE . . l� -�, ,-- h,�p�_,�� ......... .._ .. _ cy) I .,� , , M_. T ...... , -----...,. _______ — - v .