City Council Packet - 05/13/2014 114
TIGARD
City of Tigard
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS MEETING
May 13, 2014
COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED
I:lDesign&Communications\DonnalCity Councillccpkt1
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov
III • City of Tigard
Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda
TIGARD
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD
MEETING DATE AND TIME: May 13,2014 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is
available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication
items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either
the Mayor or the City Manager.
Times noted are estimated•it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to
sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be beard in any order after 7:30 p.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for
Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171,ext. 2410
(voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and
• Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead
time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by
calling: 503-639-4171,ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (113D -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE:
http://live.tistard-or.atov
CABLE VIEWERS:The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting
will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28:
Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m.
Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m.
Ill I • City of Tigard
TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD
MEETING DATE AND TIME: May 13,2014- 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223
6:30 PM
•STUDY SESSION
A. DISCUSSION WITH METRO COUNCILOR CRAIG DIRKSEN
B. DISCUSSION OF UPCOMING CON TRACTS
C. BRIEFING ON AN AGREEMENT REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER
PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF GLADSTONE
•EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive
Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable
statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.
Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS
192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the
purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the
public.
7:30 PM
1. BUSINESS MEETING
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Pledge of Allegiance
D. Council Communications&Liaison Reports
E. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please)
A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication
B. Tigard High School Student Envoy
C. Consider a Resolution Acknowledging and Commending EJ Albaugh for his Service as Tigard
High School Student Envoy to the City of Tigard
D. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce
E. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet
3. PROCLAIM MAY 18-24 AS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK
4. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council) These items are considered routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion.Anyone may request that an item be removed
by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
A. Receive and File
1. Council Calendar
2. Council Tentative Agenda for Future Meeting Topics
B. Approve City Council Minutes for:
•March 11,2014
•March 25,2014
C. FIRST QUARTER COUNCIL GOAL UPDATE
•Consent Agenda- Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Arry items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda
for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development/lgen y has voted on
those items which do not Need discussion.
Local Contract Review Board:
5. AWARD CONTRACT FOR PLANNING,DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR EAST TIGARD SEWER PROJECT
6. AWARD CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FOR 72ND
AVENUE/DARTMOUTH STREET INTERSECTION&WIDENING PROJECT
7. AWARD CONTRACT FOR 72ND AVENUE/DARTMOUTH STREET INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
8. CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO REVISE TMC 11.08 ALARMS SYSTEM
9. ADOPT ORDINANCE ADOPTING TVF&R FIRE CODE ORDINANCE NO. 14-01
10. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE N,VESTSIDE TRAIL MASTER PLAN AND
ADDING THAT PLAN TO THE TIGARD GREENWAYS TRAIL SYSTEM MASTER
PLAN
11. RECEIVE UPDATE ON TIGARD TRIANGLE STRATEGIC PLAN
12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
13. NON AGENDA ITEMS
14. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive
Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable
statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session.
Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS
192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for
the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to
the public.
15. ADJOURNMENT
AIS-1704 A.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes):20 Minutes
Agenda Title: Discussion with Metro Councilor Craig Dirksen
Submitted By: Cathy Wheatley,Administratic e Services
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council
Business
Mtg- Study
Sess.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Discussion with Metro Councilor Craig Dirksen to review topics of mutual interest for the City and Metro.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Discuss identified topics with Metro Councilor Dirksen.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Council identified the following topics as items for discussion with Metro Councilor Dirksen:
•Westside Trail
•Climate Smart Community Status
•CET (Construction Excise Tax) Grant Reauthorization
•SW Corridor Study
•VHDZ (Vertical Housing Development Zone) Application by the City of Tigard
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
n/a
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
n/a
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
April 23, 2013
October 8, 2013
Attachments
No file(.)at/ached.
CLIMATE • SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
FOR 7')/1'y i moo/
SMART (DATE OF MEETING)
di s
COMMUNITIES � QJ Ste. - ,'a
SCENARIOS PROJECT
Metro 'Lem A
r
SHAPING THE
PREFERRED APPROACH :
A DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR POLICYMAKERS
PORTLAND METROPOLITAN REGION APRIL 2014
ihr
1
A 4,7„„
•
TABLE 07-4 CO\TENTS
Introduction 3
About this guide 4
Desired outcomes 5
Regional context
Our region is changing 7
Investing in our communities 9
Paying for needed investments 10
Today's choices shape the future 12
What we've learned so far
We found good news 14
But there is more work to be done
Moving forward. 16
Policy questions for 2014
What choices have been made? 18
What choices do we still need to make?
Policy areas
Overview of policy areas 21
Make transit more convenient,frequent,accessible and affordable 23
Use technology to actively manage the transportation system . 29
Provide information and incentives to expand the use of travel options. . 33
Make biking and walking more safe and convenient 37
Make streets and highways more safe,reliable and connected 41
Manage parking to make efficient use of parking resources 45
Identify potential ways to pay for our investment choices 49
Supplemental information
Phase 2: Selected results at a glance 53
Phase 2: Transit access at a glance 57
Phase 2: Assumptions at a glance 58
Glossary 60
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for poi icymakers 1
Al" I.
i ■{ l` L p Pa, ri, .
• IL 7 1 i'm di:• _ .., . .
cm
-, d t-
b r J se tea Q.
CI
VD lag • 1` 7 Cp
m =!!` t ` a. Q. C
6 .'` -\ + rs "t .ALA' :.�. • ` - a■t
_ .4-1,-: 41111.41k. " , ,-, „_,... ••
-
t
_. T.^•� _ W
°N • 4.y. O
S t I0 a t, FUm��MIPYe S . e^ D
+ c IA r , 0. ,
"� +`.r ,1.. 41�� 666 -�W'� " L --h H•*1
i err � .. `� p.:.„.„,%.
MI Mr
It & 11
° `' 1 .� b
s-ti ,4.. I'D H
*Y e d T " ro
I.1 YAil�p}u l i. ai
I'''. odik r,1.p. '-' • ****"12^#, c"m , illt .
1,. r • c. 'a 1✓
■
Al
► a
a _. i, '- !' M • IMP\ o r.
t ` I O.w.1a -- ■ 1
11 i
�i
ti
f ;..,yea "' ! 7'° . v� ! ` r
Ilk'd • I Co
741illil /�
n,.aew M40 6._o-Ctn..,ernes e-e IN.map npwTl..�w.erm Weas..•I Q.
2040 Growth Concept Map a-„:a:.pc,aaw..o.au.anpIFIIX PIIr�1-,'al....Vtlle Mil.17... ae Carrels - E kl9 4h c.w.M Cant Neoploc
Pore...evu....en rape. . ..I •a�an tines.slaws..e...na.n M mlrcr^sn,l herd t' .q�.-e, Metro
J ililUC11 2014 corr.n.b,.aM....on,�.,nv wsy ,.,,,ISp. n� fpal.m,,.and 4. Regional center a i Pa,.ana natural areas . Planned nph carocr:v van. ■ Anport.
Y ...pow weeo.aaeop.,.e„oreawn.- co,"wm.t a pekoes ona.,......w rwn.center Ibghoorno00 Proposed Ngh cepaeury transit bell Cr1
_mI s ^w. >o....I...cam',"::.awn Iawl..nalylrw.etna e.e roo...w.n ■ ,merdry WI terminal r--r
roe e...la.,w v..,.:ww„I..CM prnemIn airm at cw,w.....ma.,m stauon corn.,.:ues aurm.1.5,ve Mainline neOt Makingagredt place I—t
Mama. .nplayrwel°.°s Meel streets UIWn eserve High speed rex
- -.27•: ••.--•”` •:" . ....._ Corridor. Urban prow In boundaries - - CouNY bound,.es
CICI
IN1 ' ROIJiC' FIO
CLIMATE
The Climate Smart Communities Scenarios Project was initiated SMART
in response to a state mandate to reduce per capita greenhouse gas COMMUNITIES
emissions from cars and small trucks by 2035. SCENARIOS PROJECT
Metro
The goal of the project is to engage community, business, public
health and elected leaders in a discussion to shape a preferred
approach that supports local plans for downtowns, main streets and
employment areas; protects farms, forestland, and natural areas;
creates healthy, livable neighborhoods; increases travel options;
and grows the regional economy while reducing greenhouse gas
emissions from cars and small trucks.
. n "..
Shaping the preferred approach Adis(ussion guide for policy makers 3
ABOUT THIS GUIDE
This discussion guide for policymakers is designed to help elected,business,
and community leaders and residents better understand the challenges and
choices facing the Portland metropolitan region. It will be used by members
of the Metro Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC) and Joint Policy Advisory
Committee on Transportation (JPACT)to help shape a preferred approach for
the Metro Council to consider for adoption in December 2014.
This guide brings together the results of the analysis completed in late 2013 and
background information on the choices facing policymakers as the Climate
Smart Communities Scenarios Project moves forward to shape a preferred
approach that supports the region's shared values and helps make local and
regional plans a reality.
The desired outcome for this discussion guide is that together, cities,counties
and regional partners will be prepared to decide which investments and actions
from each scenario should be included in the preferred approach.
What the future might look like in 2035
SCENARIO Recent Trends
A This scenario shows the results of implementing
adopted land use and transportation plans to the
extent possible with existing revenue.
SCENARIO Adopted Plans
6 This scenario shows the results of successfully
implementing adopted plans and achieving the
current Regional Transportation Plan,which relies
on increased revenue.
SCENARIO New Plans and Policies
GO This scenario shows the results of pursuing new
policies, more investment and new revenue
sources to more fully achieve adopted and
emerging plans.
The scenarios are tested for research purposes only and do not necessarily
reflect current or future policy decisions of the Metro Council, MPAC or
JPACT.
4 Shaping the preferred approach I A(Iis: I'.s:on};uiclr lurpnliryini Ito]s
DESIRED REGIONAL OUTCOMES
Vibrant
ATTRIBUTES OF GREAT COMMUNITIES communities
The six desired outcomes for the region endorsed by the Metro Policy Regional
Equity climate change
Advisory Committee and approved by the Metro Council: leadership
Making
Vibrant communities a great
People live and work in vibrant communities where their everyday needs are place
easily accessible. Clean air Transportation
and water choices
Economic prosperity Economic
Current and future residents benefit from the region's sustained economic prosperity
competitiveness and prosperity.
Safe and reliable transportation
People have safe and reliable transportation choices that enhance their quality
of life.
Leadership on climate change
The region is a leader in minimizing contributions to global warming.
Clean air and water
Current and future generations enjoy clean air, clean water,and healthy
ecosystems.
Equity
The benefits and burdens of growth and change are distributed equitably.
Shaping the preferred approach A discussion guide fay policy makers 5
IN
RACE AND ETHNICITY IN THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN REGION
,,1 1 ,_,, , itif.mik
INN WHITE
4. v t =II HISPANIC
i BLACK MEI
%-t4 tj'; ■� µ ∎ASIAN
�� OTHER/TWO OR MORE
WHITE 1980
80% �So14N
People of color are an
increasingly significant ,�
percentage of the Portland 7,ory F
metropolitan region's 'Q�rw
population. Areas with high ° Oq
poverty rates and people of 4'o4,
color are located in all three
of the region's counties- ,k
often in neighborhoods with N,
limited transit access to
11111*:0
family wage jobs and gaps
in walking and bicycling
networks.
WHI ;� 2010
52'0
0
A
P$F
p
0
0
a
1.
0
co
6 Shaping the preferred approach 1 A discussion guide for policymakers
RHGIONAL CO TEXT
,*44
OUR REGION IS CHANGING `
The Portland metropolitan region is an extraordinary place to call home.
Our region has unique communities with inviting neighborhoods,a diverse
economy and a world-class transit system.The region is surrounded by 1910
stunning natural landscapes and criss-crossed with a network of parks,trails
and wild places within a walk,bike ride or transit stop from home.Over the
years,the communities of the Portland metropolitan region have taken a
collaborative approach to planning that has helped make our region one of the o4
most livable in the country.
Because of our dedication to planning and working together to make local and
regional plans a reality,we have set a wise course for managing growth-but
times are challenging. With a growing and increasingly diverse population and 1940
an economy that is still in recovery,residents of the region along with the rest
of the nation have reset expectations for financial and job security.
Aging infrastructure, rising energy costs,a changing climate,and global • •
• .
economic and political tensions demand new kinds of leadership,innovation +�` 4.
and thoughtful deliberation and action to ensure our region remains a great T.
place to live,work and play for everyone. ,AI
1960
In collaboration with city,county, state,business and community leaders,
Metro has researched how land use and transportation policies and : •
investments can be leveraged to respond to these challenges.
r..
The region expects to welcome nearly 500,000 new residents •• _ ,. _ •-
and more than 365,000 new jobs within the urban growth ; 4
boundary by 2035. 2000
•
-. ~ ' • ' 2010
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion gu d'fur pol icy makers 7
.iii
IIIIIIHIIIHIIIH��
IIHIII1IIIIII�i 1
nmitr
mq g
INVESTING IN OUR COMMUNITIES
Oregon has been a leader among a handful of states in addressing climate C
change,with an ambitious goal to reduce greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions from - -
all sources to 75 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050. In 2009,the Oregon i
Legislature required the Portland metropolitan region to develop an approach = - `-
to reduce per capita greenhouse gas emissions from cars and small trucks by - �.
2035. .
Because our community visions focus development and investment where -- -
it makes sense-in downtowns, main streets and employment areas-and The Oregon Legislature
support transportation options for getting to work,school,and destinations has required the Portland
across the region,we already drive 20 percent fewer miles every day than region to reduce per capita
residents of other regions of similar size. greenhouse gas emissions
from cars and small trucks
While our existing local and regional plans for growth can get us to the 2035 by 2035.
target,we still have work to do to make those plans a reality.
We know that investing in quality infrastructure is essential to a functioning,
vibrant economy and healthy, livable communities. Investment in
infrastructure is also needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Past
experience and analysis indicate that investments in centers,corridors and
employment areas are an effective means of attracting growth to these areas,
supporting community visions and values,and reducing greenhouse gas
emissions.
Investments can take the form of expanding transit service; building new
sidewalks, bikeways or street connections;using technology to actively
manage the transportation system;managing parking; providing travel
option programs;expanding existing roads;and other tools. Removing
barriers to more efficient use of land and existing infrastructure can also help
communities achieve their vision for the future while reducing greenhouse gas
emissions as called for by the state.
Shaping the preferred approach A I 'rii„wn guide for polo yin,k:r, 9
SHARE OF FEDERAL AND STATE PAYING FOR NEEDED INVESTMENTS
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS IN THE
PORTLAND METROPOLITAN Our nation is investing less in infrastructure today than at any time in our
REGION BY MODE(1995—2010) history.The Portland metropolitan region is falling behind on making
3% the investments needed to support our growing population and achieve
ACTIVE community visions. Research in 2008 estimated the cost of building needed
ATION y g
()TRANSPORT
public and private infrastructure to be$27 to$41 billion by 2035.Traditional
funding sources are expected to cover only half that amount.
37% Funding for transportation investments comes from many sources,including
TRANSIT the U.S. Congress,the Federal Highway Administration,the Federal Transit
Administration,the Oregon Legislature,ODOT, Metro,cities,counties,
TriMet,South Metro Region Rapid Transit (SMART),the Port of Portland and
developers.
60%
STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS Transportation funding has long been primarily a state and federal obligation,
financed largely through gas taxes and other user fees.The purchasing power of
AVERAGE ANNUAL AMOUNT federal and state gas tax revenues is declining as individuals drive less and fuel
OF STATE AND FEDERAL efficiency increases.The effectiveness of this revenue source is further eroded
FUNDING SPENT ON CAPITAL because the gas tax is not indexed to inflation.These monies are also largely
INVESTMENTS IN THE PORTLAND
METROPOLITAN REGION dedicated to streets and highways-primarily maintenance and preservation—
(1995—2010) and to a limited extent,system expansion.
$10 million per year
active transportation We also need to complete gaps in our region's transit,walking and biking
$141 million per year networks to help expand affordable travel options,yet active transportation
transit currently lacks a dedicated funding source. Expansion and operation of
$225 million per year the transit system has relied heavily on payroll taxes for operations and
streets and highway competitive federal funding for high capacity transit. But the region's demand
for frequent and reliable transit service exceeds the capacity of the payroll tax
Source.Metro 2010
to support it.
Until the 2009 passage of the Jobs and Transportation Act(House Bill 2001)
raised the state gas tax in 2011 by six cents,this revenue source had not
increased since 1993. Similarly,the federal gas tax has not increased since 1993.
This failure of fundraising to keep pace with infrastructure needs has been
particularly acute in Oregon,as most states have turned to increased sales tax
levies to cope with the decrease in purchasing power of federal transportation
funding. Lacking a sales tax or other tools,Oregon has focused on bonding
strategies based on future revenue at the state level and therefore has not
developed a long-term strategy.
10 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policymakers
As the region's economy and its labor and housing markets continue to recover r" ,
from the Great Recession,resources remain limited for making the investments
needed to support our growing communities. Diminished resources mean -
reduced ability to maintain,improve and expand existing transportation
infrastructure. '
•
a'..: r•
-rt..
As a result,the existing transportation system is incomplete,overburdened -
and underfunded. Because federal and state funding is not keeping pace
with infrastructure operation and maintenance needs,a substantial share of
funding for future regional transportation investments has shifted to local
revenue sources. Local governments in the Portland metropolitan region(like
others in Oregon)have turned to increased tax levies,road maintenance fees,
system development charges and traffic impact fees in attempt to keep pace,
although some communities have been more successful than others.
The adopted Regional Transportation Plan calls for stabilizing existing
transportation revenue sources while securing new and innovative long-
term sources of funding adequate to build, operate and maintain the regional
transportation system for all modes of travel.
At a time when local, state and federal resources needed to
address our aging infrastructure are limited, we have a unique
opportunity to find a better way to support our corrtrnunit ics,
att ract new business, and grow the economy.
The Climate Smart Communities Scenarios Project has shown that the same
kinds of investments that can help address these infrastructure needs can also
help achieve our greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals.These kinds of
investments will also help communities grow in ways that will support local
economies for decades to come. Working together,we can develop the local,
regional,state and federal partnerships needed to invest in our communities
and realize our plans.
Shaping the preferred approach A discussion dude for policy makers 11
TODAY'S CHOICES SHAPE THE FUTURE
The region's charge from the state is to identify and adopt a preferred approach
for meeting the target by December 2014.The choices we make today about how
we live,work and get around will shape the future of the region for generations
to come. The project is being completed in three phases-and has entered the
third and final phase.
The first phase began in 2011 and concluded in early 2012.This phase consisted
of testing strategies on a regional level to understand which strategies can most
effectively help the region meet the state greenhouse gas emissions reduction
mandate.
Most of the investments and actions under consideration are already being
implemented to varying degrees across the region to realize community visions
and other important economic, social and environmental goals.
As part of the first phase, Metro staff researched strategies used to reduce
emissions in communities across the region,nation and around the world. This
work resulted in a toolbox describing the range of potential strategies,their
effectiveness at reducing emissions and other benefits they could bring to the
region, if implemented.
Climate Smart Communities Scenarios Project timeline
2011 2012- 13 2013- 14
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Understanding Shaping Shaping and
choices choices adoption of
preferred approach
Jan.2012 June 2013 June 2014 Dec.2014
Accept Direction on Direction on Adopt preferred
findings alternative preferred approach
scenarios approach
12 Shaping the preferred approach A d i;crnssion guide tor poll(vrnrrkrr.,
We found there are many ways to reduce emissions while creating healthy, ®
more equitable communities and a vibrant regional economy,but no single ME Aft
solution will enable the region to meet the state's target.
Investing in communities in ways that support local visions for the future Understanding
will be key to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Providing schools,services Our Land Use and
and shopping near where people live,improving bus and rail transit service, Transportation Choices
building new street connections,using technology to manage traffic flow,
encouraging electric cars and providing safer routes for walking and biking all
can help.
The second phase began in 2012 and concluded in October 2013. In this phase, Nil dig 1111
Metro worked with community leaders to shape three approaches-or scenarios
-
MI es am an
and the criteria to be used to evaluate them. In the summer, 2013,Metro
analyzed the three approaches to investing in locally adopted land use and
transportation plans and policies. �«•�«�> r.�,n.,ti
The purpose of the analysis was to better understand the impact of those
investments to inform the development of a preferred approach in 2014. Each
scenario reflects choices about how and where the region invests to implement CI Moro M1blinx a veal D�+a
locally adopted plans and visions.They illustrate how different levels of
leadership and investment could impact how the region grows over the next 25
years and how those investments might affect different aspects of livability for
the region.
The results of the analysis were released in fall 2013.
Three approaches that we evaluated in 2013
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
A
Recent Trends Adopted Plans New Plans and Policies
This scenario shows the This scenario shows the This scenario shows the
results of implementing results of successfully results of pursuing new
adopted land use and implementing adopted policies, more investment
transportation plans to plans and achieving the and new revenue sources
the extent possible with current Regional to more fully achieve
existing revenue. Transportation Plan which adopted and emerging
relies on increased plans.
revenue.
•
Shaping the preferred approach l A discussioit guide for pol it y makers 13
W AT W F'V F t,FAR\ IK:D SO FAR
WE FOUND GOOD NEWS
Our Phase 2 analysis indicates that adopted local and regional plans can
meet the state target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions-if we make the
investments and take the actions needed to implement those plans and make
them a reality.
The analysis also identified potentially significant benefits that can be realized
by implementing adopted plans(Scenario B)and new policies and plans
(Scenario C),including cleaner air,improved public health and safety,reduced
congestion and delay,and travel cost savings that come from driving shorter
distances and using more fuel efficient vehicles.
The analysis showed that if we continue investing at our current levels
(Scenario A)we will fall short of what has been asked of our region,as well as
other outcomes we are working to achieve-healthy communities,clean air and
water,reliable travel options,and a strong regional economy.
More results are provided in the"Supplemental Materials"section of this guide.
The reduction
SCENARIO a SCENARIO C
•)- ADOPTED NEW PLANS target is from
PLANS & POLICIES 2005 emissions
IN III MP!
develoPed levels after
2014 reductions
adopted in 2014 expected from
cleaner fuels
12% and more fuel-
efficient vehicles.
S .
Tf.=c:•F I
24%
36%
14 Shaping the preferred approach I A d iscussion guide for poll:ylnakers
BUT THERE IS MORE WORK TO BE DONE _ ,'q`
�wlrj 'M
We're all in this together Local,regional, state and federal partnerships are
needed to make the investments and take the actions needed to implement a
adopted local and regional plans and meet the state target. Our findings
can help the region make the case for the increased investment and new
partnerships that will be needed to implement the preferred approach the
Metro Council considers for adoption in December 2014. ,Jr
lir
y s ail
Implementation goes hand in hand with community engagement and
participation We must continue working with community leaders to build A one-size-fits-all approach
capacity of organizations and their members to participate in ongoing local won't meet the needs of
and regional planning and implementation efforts.This will help ensure our diverse communities.
meaningful opportunities for participation of public health, social equity and
A
environmental justice leaders and the communities they represent as we move combination of all of the
forward to eliminate disparities. investments and actions
under consideration is needed
A transition to cleaner fuels and more fuel-efficient vehicles is essential to help us realize our shared
Oregon cannot achieve its greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals without vision for making this region
the significant advancements in fleet and technology committed to by a great place for generations
the state. It is critical for the Oregon Legislature and state commissions to to come.
prioritize investments and actions that will catalyze this transition to ensure
assumptions used to set our region's emissions reduction target are realized.
Prioritizing investments that achieve multiple goals in combination
with more funding will help us get there The greatest barrier to
implementation is the lack of sufficient funding to make the investments
needed for our local and regional plans to become a reality. More state funding
is needed to leverage local and regional funding and assist future planning and
implementation. With limited funding,it is even more important to prioritize
investments that support healthy, equitable communities and a strong
economy,while reducing greenhouse gas emissions to create the future we
want for the region.
But first, the Metro Council is asking cities,counties,regional partners and the
public to weigh in on which investments and actions from each of the three
scenarios should go forward into a preferred approach and how we should pay
for the needed investments.
Shaping the preferred approach! A discussion guide fo&pulitymakers 15
MOVING FORWARD
•
In the 1990s, regional policy discussions centered on how and where the region
1: ! �, should grow to protect the things that make this region a great place to live,
work and play.Those discussions led to the adoption of the region's long-range
strategy,the 2040 Growth Concept.This strategy reflects shared community
• values and desired outcomes that continue to resonate today.
The Portland metropolitan The preferred approach will not replace the 2040 Growth Concept nor be a
region pioneered approaches stand-alone plan. Instead,it will be a set of recommended policies and actions
to land use and transpor- for how the region moves forward to integrate reducing greenhouse gas emis-
tation planning that make sions with ongoing efforts to create the future we want for our region.
it uniquely positioned to
address the state climate THROUGH MAY 2014
goals, due to the solid,well- Policymakers weigh in on which investments and actions should be included in
integrated transportation and the region's preferred approach
land-use systems in place and
a history of working together JUNE 2014
to address complex challenges The Metro Council is asked to provide direction to staff on the draft preferred
at a regional scale. approach
SUMMER 2014
Evaluation of the preferred approach and development of a near-term
implementation plan
SEPTEMBER 2014
Final public review of the preferred approach
DECEMBER 2014
Metro Council considers adoption of the preferred approach
JANUARY 2015
Submit adopted approach to Land Conservation and Development Commission
for approval
16 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide lot poi tcymakers
WHAT IS THE PREFERRED APPROACH?
The preferred approach will be a set of recommended policies and actions
for how the region moves forward to integrate reducing greenhouse gas
emissions with ongoing efforts to create the future we want for our region.
LEGISLATION The Metro Council will consider adoption of legislation :A I
signaling the region's commitment to the preferred approach through the
ongoing implementation of the 2040 Growth Concept.The legislation will
include:
POLICIES Regional Framework Plan(RFP)amendments
• Changes to refine existing RFP policies and/or add new policies to achieve
the preferred approach.
ACTIONS Recommended actions
• Menu of investments and other tools needed to achieve the preferred
approach that can be tailored by each community to implement local
visions.
• Near-term actions needed to implement and achieve the preferred
approach.This could include:
- state and federal legislative agendas that request funding,policy
changes or other tools needed to achieve preferred approach
- identification of potential/likely funding mechanisms for key actions
- direction to the 2018 Regional Transportation Plan update
- direction to future growth management decisions
- direction for functional plan amendments that guide local
implementation,if needed.
• Monitoring and reporting system that builds on existing performance
monitoring requirements per ORS 197.301 and updates to the Regional
Transportation Plan.
Through this collaborative effort, we can identify how the region
shot'Id work together to develop new kinds of leadership and the
local, regional, state and federal partnerships needed to invest in
communities to make local and regional plans a reality.
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for polio ynsakers 17
POLICY QUESTIONS FOR 2014
WHAT CHOICES HAVE BEEN MADE?
In February,the Metro Policy Advisory Committee and Joint Policy Advisory
Committee on Transportation approved a path for moving forward with
an eight-step process to shape and adopt a preferred approach in 2014.As
recommended by MPAC and JPACT, the preferred approach will start with the
plans cities,counties and the region have already adopted-from local zoning,
capital improvement,comprehensive,and transportation system plans to
the 2040 Growth Concept and regional transportation plan-to create great
communities and build a vibrant economy.
This includes managing the urban growth boundary through regular growth
management cycles (currently every six years). In addition, MPAC and JPACT
agreed to include assumptions for cleaner fuels and more fuel-efficient vehicles
as defined by state agencies during the 2011 target-setting process.A third
component they recommended be included in the preferred approach is the
Statewide Transportation Strategy assumption for vehicle insurance paid by
the miles driven.
WHAT CHOICES HAVE BEEN MADE?
In January and February of 2014, MPAC,JPACT and the Metro Council
agreed these elements should be included in the draft preferred approach
as a starting point:
Implement adopted regional and local plans
Implement the 2040 Growth Concept and local zoning,comprehensive
and transportation plans and manage the urban growth boundary
through regular growth management cycles.
I✓1 Transition to cleaner fuels and fuel-efficient vehicles
Rely on state fleet and technology assumptions used when setting our
region's target.
✓I Support vehicle insurance paid by the miles driven
Use state assumptions for pay-as-you-drive insurance.
18 Shaping the preferred approach A di.5:nysion guide for policymak&rs
WHAT CHOICES DO WE STILL NEED TO MAKE? ►
Since January 2014,the Metro Council has engaged community and business
leaders, local governments and the public on what mix of investments and ac-
tions best support their community's vision for healthy and equitable commu-
nities and a strong economy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
I Through May 2014,policymakers will consider the results of the engagement ,�^ "= � �
activities and scenarios evaluation as they weigh in on these policy questions:
I How much transit should we provide by 2035?
How much should we use technology to actively manage the
transportation system by 2035?
Li How much should we expand the reach of travel information
programs by 2035?
How much of the planned active transportation network should we
complete by 2035?
How much of the planned street and highway network should we
complete by 2035?
How should local communities manage parking by 2035?
I How should we pay for our investment choices by 2035?
Shaping the preferred approach I A dist ussion guide for}xlitymakers 19
N
O
a Jurisdictional map of the Portland metropolitan region
lo saw e,
liana
A j '
D r . ' l
..
rz <
.~,
fit
Burlington •\ �.
��
a.
Ai
b • 3° Vancouver
p Banks z6 _ - 1 `.•` r
ft Nona I`,_: '`•, !,1
` •• St Johns r` Camas
.` }Q r••
t �'•\ UVesl _Bethany, v'I '\ Washougal
_
vi
J.•-' • J Uvidn t
On /t _•,l Rakrreek _ ,t\, \ Parkrose
r „ - '•" Tdnasbourne - '
a 'I I O,enro Oak [edai I,:� `•r • Maywood r j' Q
_ � •'. HMS Mill t 1. Hollywood �-_ •Qom,. Trout��Jale
,'I Fauv,ew?
o '. Forest Cornelia-,,-,� Hillsboro �z]+ L._` Park Q ' ■•
_ � r. • l :- Portland Gateway r .
y.Gro^el..�,��.•�..�.' �`.. ^` Sunset Bdckwoode..:. f�e•
y tr I• �� HilIs 1^ t
,x .Ae �j �•+ Aloha • , ►a ill ,4--,
t .'l
�. `'i 3- zs, Gresham ;.,
9� i Beaverton al Lgh eats i
•- rill, orill H,Ilsdale ,
, Washington 1
Pleasant .al.
Farmington ,� West Portland ,_ - - _wall L„,,A 'r- - o,r�r
Gaston "J _ t.., ti... Square , " s t - - - - -
_. (z° Milwaukie Happy
,
., 4- Valley t.
Tigard c••:`KastAS;. ..
MveyvSrhu��, ' Lake J oak ' '"a Clackamas,"1 4 Damascus . Bor�r,g
W ASHiNGTON .
I
YAMHILL L'_ King ' * Oswego Grow .�. t ® } -z6
�� Johnson _a .•'•-
.�; City �,Y�reGr°ve 1.,,,. -re J1' r•..—'*''�.._.
���y-� �.
I
.•I 'Our '"!� ti 43 .� c6aprsr r _ K Sancti,
''13 19441Fe Stafford Gladst a sa::ro
- .�
Tualatin ,
1. ,.- , ...2 '.t West 0e doilf
!Sherwood,- J o' lip,....,/ Linn
/ I - Y a.
Ore i
Cit =._
�, !i . ^:y iL Syr mettr,Tc:n,..mar Eagle Creek
.l Urban growth t,.. Redlend
.__� boundary _'_ _I _
I n.
_ County boundary 'Newb 1 ,Wilsonville .K. '
Newberg
C45, 1 ,,.Dundee l rim ...' _!,•
';.P.:.KAMAS
Metro °"
Canby o vtae5 ,o
3,low
•
•
AREAS
• •
. • •. .
POLICY
OVERVIEW OF POLICY AREAS
This section provides background information on the seven policy areas being
considered by the region's policymakers:
• Make transit more convenient, frequent,accessible and affordable
• Use technology to actively manage the transportation system
• Provide information and incentives to expand the use of travel options
• Make biking and walking more safe and convenient
• Make streets and highways more safe, reliable and connected
• Manage parking to make efficient use of parking resources
• Identify potential ways to pay for our investment choices
The first three pages include a description of the policy, its potential climate
benefit, cost, implementation benefits and challenges,and a summary of
the how the policy is implemented for each scenario.The last page of each
description summarizes emerging themes and specific comments provided
during project public engagement activities.
EXPLANATION OF THE CLIMATE BENEFIT RATINGS
In Phase 1 of the project,staff conducted a sensitivity analysis to better understand the greenhouse gas
emissions reduction potential of individual policies.The information derived from the sensitivity analysis
was used to develop a five-star rating system for communicating the relative climate benefits of different
policies.The ratings represent the potential effects of individual policy areas in isolation and do not capture
variations that may occur from synergies between multiple policies.
Estimated reductions assumed in climate benefits ratings
less than 1% * * * * *
1 - 2% * * * * *
3 - 6% ' 7�t'
* * *
1*
7— 15% 7[ * * * * Source Memo to TPAC and interested parties on Climate
16 — 20% * * ,* Smart Communities:Phase i Metropolitan GreenSTEP
scenarios sensitivity analysis(June 21,2012)
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide tot policymakers 21
EXPLANATION OF THE RELATIVE COST RATINGS
Like the relative climate benefit ratings,the cost ratings provide a quick reference for comparing the
relative cost of investments between policy areas.The estimated cost of each policy area for each
scenarios is provided below.
The relative climate benefit and cost ratings are provided to simplify information presented for purposes
of discussion.
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR EACH SCENARIO BY POLICY AREA (2014$)
I N ',1 ' SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B 0
Transit capital $590 million $1.9 billion $5.1 billion
Transit operations $4.8 billion S5.3 billion $9.5 billion
Technology $113 million $135 million $193 million
Information $99 million $124 million $234 million
Active transportation $57 million S948 million $3.9 billion
Streets and highways $162 million $8.8 billion $11.8 billion
capital'
Parking n/a n/a n/a
Total costs' $6 billion $17 billion
$31 billion
'Table note does not include road-related operations,maintenance and preservation costs.
22 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policyrnakers
lila a 1 ,,-, ,k4: ,I. ,
•11
rissess
to , ,...,,w6„.. .
�,� • ,�.,, ,, 1 SM RI'
�,� , }
, ,- ,Lihtliii • ' , 7,40, if .0"' ' , _____—
4' - II .
RELATIVE CLIMATE BENEFIT Make transit more convenient,
* * * * * frequent, accessible and affordable
There are four key ways to make transit service more convenient,frequent,
RELATIVE COST accessible and affordable.The effectiveness of each will vary depending on the
$ $ mix of nearby land uses,the number of people living and working in the area,and
the extent to which travel information,marketing and technology are used.
Frequency Increasing the frequency of transit service in combination with
transit signal priority and bus lanes makes transit faster and more convenient.
System expansion Providing new community and regional transit
connections improves access to jobs and community services and makes it
easier to complete some trips without multiple transfers.
Transit access Building safe and direct walking and biking routes and
crossings that connect to stops makes transit more accessible and convenient.
Fares Providing reduced fares makes transit more affordable;effectiveness
depends on the design of the fare system and the cost.
Transit is provided in the region by TriMet and South Metro Area Rapid Transit
(SMART) in partnership with Metro,cities,counties,employers,business
associations and non-profit organizations.
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• improves access to jobs,the workforce, • transit demand outpacing funding
and goods and services,boosting • enhancing existing service while
business revenues expanding coverage and frequency to
• creates jobs and saves consumers and growing areas
employers money • reduced revenue and federal funding,
• stimulates development,generating leading to increased fares and service
local and state revenue cuts
• provides drivers an alternative to • preserving affordable housing
congested roadways and supports options near transit
freight movements by taking cars off • ensuring safe and comfortable access
the road to transit for pedestrians,cyclists and
• increases physical activity drivers
• reduces air pollution and air taxies • transit-dependent populations
• reduces risk of traffic fatalities and locating in parts of the region that are
injuries harder to serve with transit
Shaping the preferred approach i A discussion guide for poi icy m.akers 23
How much transit should we provide by 2035?
TRANSIT AT A GLANCE
';i•l N SCFNAl ( SCENARIO
A B
0
Daily revenue hours 5,600 6,200 11,200
Service expansion 14%increase 27%increase 129%increase
(increase from 2010
level)
Rush hour frequency 10-minute service on 10 10-minute service on 13 routes 10-minute service on 37
routes routes
Off-peak frequency 30-minute service on most 20-minute service on most 15 or 20-minute service on
routes routes most routes
New high capacity ; None Planned connections corn- All regional centers and more
transit connections pleted,such as the extension town centers served
to Vancouver,WA
Priority high capacity transit
system plan and Southwest
Corridor completed
Other service Westside Express Service Same as Scenario A,plus WES operates all day with
enhancements ; (WES)and Portland streetcar more planned Portland street- 15-minute service
operate at 2010 frequencies car connections completed
Locally-developed Service
Enhancement Plans(SEPs)
and the planned Portland
Streetcar System Plan mostly
completed
Public and private j Existing private shuttles Additional major employers More major employers and
shuttles continue to operate between and some community-based some community-based orga-
large work sites and major organizations work with nizations work with TriMet to
transit stops TriMet to operate shuttles operate shuttles
Fares Reduced fares provided to Same as Scenario A Same as Scenario A,plus
youth,older adults and reduced fares provided to low-
disabled persons income families
Estimated capital $590 million $1.9 billion $5.1 billion
cost*(2014$)
Estimated service $4.8 billion $5.3 billion $9.5 billion
operating costs** ($187 million per year) ($207 million per year) ($374 million per year)
(2014$)
*Capital costs reflect HCT capital costs plus fleet replacement and expansion costs.
**Operating costs for TriMet service were calculated by annualizing the daily revenue hours proposed for each scenario and applying
TriMet's average operating cost per revenue hour,with cost by mode weighted by the proportion of service provided on each mode.
SMART operating costs were calculated by assuming SMART's FY 11-12 annual operating costs are maintained through 2035.
(See Supplemental materials section,Phase 2:Transit Access at a Glance.)
24 Shaping the preferred approach A discussion guide for polkymakers
Scenario A
r Frequency(minutes) SCENARIO
5-30 Urban center
RECENT TRENDS --_. u.is Employment
Transit service a, 16-25
Rush hour i 26 as M s
+,� Over 45 County IMe
(7-9am,4-6pm) - - -_
4 Q
Recent Trends
", >b,, This scenario
shows the results
p Belluny ...II I.'r- of implementing«• � �_ 4a adopted land use and
Grove corn,,,,, Hillsboro
_ Leda,
Kt „� ; . a,ev;sy= Leevewwoo`y °O transportation plans
Suns., " '•'krOM VJlig!
era, s to the extent possible
"°'a ee. . ton ,,•� a m with existing revenue.
R�ewh w�,;',��I.
tHJt,
r Washington ""k° l s Pleasant 31%jobs
Square vault' Q'evq sEg ,
wellantl ; ----t� 24% households
I,iMnukie r .
Murray/knolls rd Clackamas „. 31% low-income
Os.egn Valli
KOQ Grove Damascus households
Lak
H
Estimated jobs and
tuMon e, Gladstone s
CLIMATEatl
,d' west households within
°rte°" 1/4-mile of 10-minute
aye Ot 8
West y
SMART inn J or better service by
COMMUNITIES 2035
SCENARIOS PROJECT
W,i oonJle ;'
f Metro
Date 1/2/2014-MRH
-
Scenario A
Frequency(minutes) ' 6%jobs
••••■••• 5 10 Urban center 4% households
RECENT TRENDS 11.15
16 25 Employment 5% low-income
Transit service 26 45 UGB households
Daytime and evening ,,y Over 45 County lme
(9am-4pm,6pm-close) a ■ o µM Estimated jobs
and households
,,,sN`°`.N.., within 1/4-mile
�""a, _- Net ° '� tw."""e of 10-minute or
Bethany is,
t � ,,, M1FM.sa better service by
co ca,,,l s H:IIsDOro o•f eeaa, '"°,ar 2035
Mdl HoNysv a L
.ese outoa..
Gateway ra woos
Sunset ' ''''"aM uJlage
T Portia' s. "`s
along Beaverton ..,,,,,,r777'
a:d`•pa aP Gresham
se+ �sr vo.�.e, ._.,.1: .n es.-,
RNIIIgh yl w5�.
HAIa
i Washington
7,111 tents peasant ste
Square - _ vein, 4.,Mn s¢
West a
a vorunnd x
° ;"*..
MJWaukie p
Murray/50°1;s tigard Clackamas yy F�
Oskwe Npty DI
Lake
9a
King Grove Oamascut
City
tualahn Gladstone
CLIMATE 51r "fa West " y Oregon
`g
SMARTlmn sg a Note These maps are for
COMMUNITIES 8 t research purposes only
SCENARIOS PROJECT 2i, and do not reflect current
y amnia t or future policy decisions
etS:Metro of the Metro Council.
Owe O 1/L2014-MRH/ M PAC or J PACT.
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide to] poi icy makers 25
SCENARIO
Scenario B Frequency(minutes)
'.... 5- Urban center•
ADOPTED PLANS 11•1s 25
16-25 Employment
Transit service aA J 26•45 UGB
Rush hour ii.' Over 45 County line
Adopted Plans (7-9am,4-6pm) / a ;�' �,Q` 4
This scenario
1
shows the results
of successfully � H�°"pM
Belha-�y ` I,a t
implementing 1 i atl r � a. aT Maa44
adopted plans Grove core,;., a°"
Hillsboro cedar , "A 1 roe.,' 61''.
Mill - _ _Troutdale
y: eWa Fa�rview'yyood
and achieving the Sunset ...� y Village
current Regional a"y" _ � "5i
Aloha Be ertan oonP -raw • AK am
Transportation +s^ e i .a1oga ' r r li TV*• N W n Bhd
Plan,which relies m 311.. 7•j s
' WaShl-910h s Pleasant
Fa,
on increased j Sou- We "� F scB
revenue. WiYke I o x
Mu ay6<wv' 4117 'tlackamaS
Lai 'Va"'pW al
33%jobs Lake
Orgo
a � "
n9 Greve Damascus
27% households
aalaun „a "s•y
34% low-income 5 eiWood w5e U egon SD 1.
households CLIMATE t- y : `City g
Estimated jobs and SMART Lan" s r
households within COMMUNITIES
SCENARIOS PROJECT p
t/4-mile of 10-minute W3sorvmle g
or better service by Nierro
Dale:3/17/2019•MRH.2
6%jobs
` Frequency(minutes)
4% households Scenario B
•
5-ll) Urban Censer
6% low-income ADOPTED PLANS 11-1s
36 2S Employment
households Transit service 3 26-45 UGB
Estimated jobs and Daytime and evening i
) s t, - Over 45
Count y
line
(9am-4pm,6pm-close) , a households within
1/4-mile of 10-minute u-._tiF -
or better service by '°""` °e
*IN 2035 _tr■ ,,,,b,„..�
Bethany _7■ r,,,
G
r:Yell Ce,^e,us Hillsboro eedx
M�II f�ou:oer
w - + __....,.., '.- s Gateway - ra.mea Wood
k�naer J O. -E B"'^9a sl Rockwood '1,Il0ge
ansa 'zE.sws St
A'Qh.. Beaverton .no SE In �a 1-Mh
St'"yr- Boom;
Raleigh
1 Hills
t Washington J Pleasant
q*e
( ❑■ Valley 4
Square WO!
I ... Sea
tland 11
'hvaukie F F '261
Murny/Sdtolls T - lk Clackamas
Happy Fi
0 Valley
King Gana Damascus
City
Tua n s. Gladstone
3'
Sherwood y 4 Wes'
L"" i
'tf CLI MATE Oregon
s City
SMART Grin
COMMUNITIES
SCENARIOS PROJECT
, WWilsonville� f.
Dow 1111/201/•MRH1
26 Shaping the preferred approach 1 A d iscussion guide lot poltcymake�rs //
Scenario C Frequency(minutes)
SCENARIO
NEW PLANS & 5-10 Urban center
POLICIES 11-15
Employment
25
GI
Transit service 16-
26-45
UGB
45
Rush hour .e y Over 45 County line
(7-9am,4-6pm) 1 ,. 4\ o r — New Plans
." and Policies
"� This scenario
t �, ,,, "" shows the results
!`� f i I r r a,�„y .E.�M...c, of pursuing new
Gave Hiiisbo _' �,ar Cedar 1 II 1r.dig s� policies, more
Grove Camillus chg.
ro�taaie P
•�� ,� �'�' investment and new
l III R`p,�• '/, — 9_i f•'i 1_♦i� �'!!MI revenue sources to
�_dl \
'/ ` . , __ more fully achieve
lel•is,tour ''”. Pleasant adopted and
wu. � � -"�"-" 0 emerging plans.
,t
�` � rr�Iwaukie t 26�
Clack.--. H,,,y g. 42%jobs LP
/ 1�%" Niti• Valryamasc"' 32% households
. i�
't>f. a * ‘ , 1, 40% low-income
/f y g_ Li egos ,� households
CLIMATE ' airy g Estimated jobs and
SMART S' .+ households within
COMMUNITIES t; h 1/4-mile of 10-minute
SCENARIOS PROJECT n
w,iwnviue or better service by
v1et ro °
Dale 1/10R014-MRH.) 2035
Scenario C Frequency(minutes) 23%jobs
NEW PLANS & — 5-10 Urban center 20% households
POLICIES 11-is
Employment 26% low-income
Transit service r 16-25
Daytime and evening d 26-45 UGB households
ro Over 45 County line
- -(9am-4pm,6pm-close) 1 4"+.4 o MH Estimated jobs and
households within
I.,. "�r,,„� '/4 mile of 10 minute
1��
�' Mylma.e or better service by
y -, iiiii 2035
Crow CanNius Hilisbor.. or , Cedar \•� ,C;r,1 ' •
Mill �r TrLr�dt�aiu
Sunset ' d r " t Ro driliage
ra i ! i: sr�
„ trL�
I �Iy '-�� •��.
S.s Ington dsr F' Vaeasant in
.a. • � valley 4
Kies l a
^r and \ i
r/ ' ,Mausie t 1�1
;
Valley Y
Lake / Damascus
King Grow -
City
rulfaa• •,.•t..j.
Sherwood G'`,.. .regonvG,
CLIMATE City A
SMART Iwo
s
COMMUNITIES s
SCENARIOS PROJECT $ i
s
wdson.a.
Nlfrtro 8
Date.DID/2014•MRH J
Shaping the preferred approach i A discussion guide for policym akers 27
What people are saying Emerging themes
• Transit was universally seen as the highest
Transit needs to be more frequent, priority investment area because of its high
potential to reduce emissions while improving
affordable and connected to more access to jobs and services and supporting other
places people want to go. community goals.
• The cost of transit must be kept affordable,
particularly for people with disabilities,youth,
older adults and those with limited incomes.
To increase the accessibility - Integration with land use,active transportation,
and affordability of public information,technology and a well-connected
transit is paramount. street system will help transit be more
convenient and accessible for more people.
- Important to seek creative local transit service
options and partnerships that fit the needs of
smaller communities,including shuttles to
support crucial last-mile connections.
• Prioritize low-income communities for
bus service improvements and ensure that
affordable housing and transportation options
remain after major transit investments are made
in a community.
- More funding for transit is needed.
Key takeaways to share with others
•
28 Shaping the preferred approach { A discussion guide for policymakers
w.cwr
ODDtare: E P• F 'a
•
�ro.mr■ .. ,f r.r.- je . YiEl
. _ 45 - �S X- 45 4tR1►t[0
.:.i / .. t 4 - -
•
T + �► '
•
ilewwwWw
CHerA F� Ss'• '1:7. i
RELATIVE CLIMATE BENEFIT Use technology to actively manage
* * the transportation system
Using technology to actively manage the Portland metropolitan region's trans-
RELATIVE COST portation system means using intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and
services to reduce vehicle idling associated with delay,making walking and
biking more safe and convenient,and helping improve the speed and reliability
of transit. Nearly half of all congestion is caused by incidents and other factors
that can be addressed using these strategies.
Local,regional and state agencies work together to implement transportation
system technologies.Agreements between agencies guide sharing of data and
technology,operating procedures for managing traffic,and the ongoing mainte-
nance and enhancement of technology,data collection and monitoring systems.
Arterial corridor management includes advanced technology at each inter-
section to actively manage traffic flow.This may include coordinated or adap-
tive signal timing; advanced signal operations such as cameras,flashing yellow
arrows,bike signals and pedestrian count down signs;and communication to a
local traffic operations center and the centralized traffic signal system.
Freeway corridor management includes advanced technology to manage
access to the freeways,detect traffic levels and weather conditions,provide
information with variable message signs and variable speed limit signs,and
deploying incident response patrols that quickly clear breakdowns,crashes and
debris.These tools connect to a regional traffic operations center.
Traveler information includes using variable message and speed signs and 511
internet and phone services to provide travelers with up-to-date information
regarding traffic and weather conditions, incidents, travel times,alternate
routes,construction,or special events.
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• provides near-term benefits • requires ongoing funding to
• reduces congestion and delay maintain operations and monitoring
• makes traveler experience more systems
reliable • requires significant cross-
• saves public agencies,consumers and jurisdictional coordination
businesses time and money • workforce training gaps
• reduces air pollution and air toxics
• reduces risk of traffic fatalities and
injuries
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policy makers 29
How much should we use technology to actively
manage the transportation system by 2035?
TECHNOLOGY AT A GLANCE
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B 0
Advanced traffic Traffic signals on some major 1 Traffic signals on many major All traffic signals are
signal operations arterials arterials ' connected to a centralized
system
Transit signal priority Some bus routes with All bus routes with 10-minute All bus routes with in-minute
10-minute service service service
Freeway ramp meters Most urban interchanges Same as Scenario A All urban interchanges
Freeway variable None Deployed in most high inci- Deployed in all high incident
speed signs dent locations locations
Incident response Some incident response ' More incident response Incident response patrols are
patrols patrols are deployed on area patrols are deployed on area deployed on area freeways
freeways freeways and major arterials adjacent
to freeways
Estimated cost $113 million $135 million $193 million
(2014$)
SCENARIO Will . *made message sign Scenario A r l� 1d. ' . Var■be speed iKmt Urban centers
A �. i •• — Remo meter Employment
H RECENT TRENDS i y� .�,F,ee �management IndnW
Transportation System - P ^i Art,let management Lt7,rynwth
Management and I n,Tronsn egnaipnmrcy , coontybbondery
Recent Trends Operations —1_,Y ; r'`
This scenario a }? ` '', t :"`-L '_ -� if
<�.� i ,`43 Ai shows the results F� ,R _ ,., � - _-
of implementing ; - ' a .„-L,4, -7� - 1 if r a �.
adopted land use and �: I, r Vim_ !_
transportation plans k-, ;P--r:{;;l -,
to the extent possible •i�_ _ 1* ' _ ::`
with existing revenue. �`� ' '`"` -060-.6.
•
i l"f .as i. ,'..• \L)
10% on arterials i=ce. `.- t._.rt_ I' •l
and freeways ."1.=! . .. (T`' '. ' . 1 o`zi `. r
Estimated delay I - ---- r �- %v i' � 4 . "" j� �r�l��
reduction by 2035 1._ } �`�-� 1 �
i .rte.._
11 mob . _ � � �,� `�, � \ ,._...-
r ' ' NIL it .„, .. .. -, _A,..._,
,,,,. -
CLIMATE - ! .. . . \ 1
_ r
Note These maps are for SMART ---i.,____-`' ''""r" � ?� /'t; " ' I
research purposes only COMMUNITIES r �A s. i C " l I
and do not reflect current l
or future policy decisions ;y}, _ \ = "--"-' p i=14j `i
of the Metro Council, '�1 't n r ! '. L ,f. "'�•4 .. 'r 4 1 1 i
MPAC or JPACT. r ��r _ ,',:...,i
30 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policymakers
.4 • Yarlabiamessagesgn SCENARIO•Scenario B �' + ,,,,aaar"„ers
wnabe,peedJana
ADOPTED PLANS �,� .tt ��` .. Ramp miter Eapigmrnt
>r a
I
�, ��Freeway management 'K=ry
Transportation System .. '---+,•rtenal management , -Urban WOMm
4 y �- Boundary
Management and i ` '. n . county boundary
9 - " �: y. . �I Trans signal pnart
Operations i_ T, t-,... -
Adopted Plans
- J �f Ili.,,... _ � s '�'` w. , f ' t; This scenario
�._ r. _ .� - ` shows the results
f _, �:F- �►' �{ r.R +' - of successfully
}F ti ' Wyk%:: i•
p'� .5�""=' ', i, i t'� ,. current Regional
r `..?1, a ,..�i. °- a ' I Transportation
L- . •
{ `� f t t._-r�_ ii _..._._._ _� ... I" -`; Plan, which relies
rt.c i . t'' _- ,.. , p ,° on Increased
-- `-' .0
[ :__ _ _ = :-- revenue.
_ •l f. ,. �-.. - - -- 20% on arterials
' l -- .r.,.1�.h} and freeways
li _ _ . `ti _ Estimated delay
CLIMATE _--��, ' ,_ ., . ri; reduction by 2035
SMART • . ,. :. �
S j
r
COMMUNITIES . , « i .4. _.i 1 �' 1
SCENARIOS PROJECT ti_:-y <4 `- i "tiyr..
Metro ../- t• L .:.;, al----"T i' 7 l
" yJ t r
Scenario C r( 1 ' -'•.t, • Variable messageslgn SCENARIO
NEW PLANS & f s'I!• - s 1 • Variable speed limn '' Urban ttnlers
POLICIES ,� , RamDmeler Empbyment
>+ ^/Freeway management '� •ala•UY
Transportation System .� ^„tw,,i",,.a�ae ....:•Glen Gmwth
M
0
anagement and I\ . :Mt'
�•Tuwrw,rpway county boundary
Operations I
'�' • New Plans
;;"i-,� ?+ ! x � ,< and Policies
This scenario
r S� 1,, ,_. d �� ,,: a": shows the results
':; '`-� �,�■ „�_- �' of pursuing new
.. P ':'li ��L t �= `-^ �S"r"�"' .. policies,more
`�� °.... aVIBM.1.1O - WM .•- investment and new
�'r, � 1 r i- _ .�- • ,. revenue sources to
C *. ' 1 • more fully achieve
�a;A, ,1_ r �._.J�_ �. r' ' 1. a k - .... .r T. adopted and•
_ i r {'T t' ` . - emerging plans.•
/' -s ,.._ -; .' 35% on arterials
' r
i - a f.j, ,• F-' ' , •�: ', and freeways
' + ' • Estimated delay
n, L: .- • reduction by 2035
•CLIMATE - - . ,_ 1 i r * < ' i . ; .
SMART _
... i a
z
•
COMMUNITIES 4k. r i'_ 4 1 t, '1,
SCENARIOS PROJECT ',� �/ s j• «w- ._..i 'w.,l) + 1. y -
Qie Metro 7 .t - -\.,_ , f' r t 1 M` .
Shaping the preferred approach I A di.ctission guide for poll(yrndl•r i s 31
What people are saying Emerging themes
• This is a low-cost strategy with immediate
Do as much as you can with benefits that support other capital investments
technology before widening or and should be moved forward.
building new roads to help save • When compared to traditional capital
money. investments,such as new transit service,roads
or additional lanes,these kinds of solutions
offer high returns for a comparatively low cost,
Intelligent transportation and can delay or remove the need for additional
systems help freight move capital-intensive infrastructure.
more efficiently and reliably. • Reducing delay and increasing reliability of
the freight network is critical for the health our
regional economy.
• Provide comprehensive real-time traveler
information to people and businesses before
they begin their trip.
Key takeaways to share with others
32 Shaping the preferred approach 1 A discussion guide for polirymakt.1;
ti
•
\10 • • 0404.41:41 Pr\
y F DRIVE
RELATIVE CLIMATE BENEFIT Provide information and incentives
* * * to expand the use of travel options
Public awareness,education and travel options support tools are cost-effective
RELATIVE COST ways to improve the efficiency of the existing transportation system through
increased use of travel options such as walking,biking,carsharing,carpooling
and taking transit. Local, regional and state agencies work together with
businesses and non-profit organizations to implement programs in coordination
with other capital investments. Metro coordinates partners'efforts,sets strategic
direction,evaluates outcomes,and manages grant funding.
Public awareness strategies include promoting information about travel
choices and teaching the public about eco-driving: maintaining vehicles to
operate more efficiently and practicing driving habits that can help save time
and money while reducing greenhouse emissions.
Commuter programs are employer-based outreach efforts that include (1)
financial incentives,such as transit pass programs and offering cash instead
of parking subsidies; (2) facilities and services,such as carpooling programs,
bicycle parking,emergency rides home,and work-place competitions; and (3)
flexible scheduling such as working from home or compressed work weeks.
Individualized Marketing(IM)is an outreach method that encourages
individuals,families or employees interested in making changes in their
travel choices to participate in a program.A combination of information and
incentives is tailored to each person's or family's specific travel needs. IM can be
part of a comprehensive commuter program.
Travel options support tools reduce barriers to travel options and support
continued use with tools such as the Drive Less.Connect. online carpool
matching;trip planning tools;wayfinding signage;bike racks;and carsharing.
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• increases cost-effectiveness of capital • program partners need ongoing tools
investments in transportation and resources to increase outcomes
• saves public agencies,consumers and • factors such as families with children,
businesses time and money long transit times,night and weekend
• preserves road capacity work shifts not served by transit
• reduces congestion and delay • major gaps exist in walking and
• increases physical activity and reduces biking routes across the region
health care costs • consistent data collection to support
• reduces air pollution and air toxics performance measurement
Shaping the preferred approach A discussion guile For policyinahers 33
How much should we expand the reach
of travel information programs by 2035?
TRAVEL INFORMATION PROGRAMS AT A GLANCE
` L ENAL ., SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B O
Individualized 30%of households Same as Scenario A 60%of households participate
marketing
participation Same as Scenario B,plus
the addition of Safe Routes
to school and equity-based
campaigns
Commuter program 20%of employees reached Same as Scenario A 40%of employees reached
participation (same as 2010)
ECO rules now include work
Oregon Employee Commute sites with more than 5o
Options(ECO)rules require employees
work sites with more than
10o employees to have work-
place programs
Public awareness 50%of public reached Same as Scenario A,plus 60%of public reached
marketing campaign added resources promote new
Existing ongoing and short- travel tools,regional efforts Scenario B,plus regionally
term campaigns lead to and safety education specific campaigns dedicated
more awareness of DriveLess. to safety and underserved
Connect. communities
Eco-driving 0%of households reached 30%of households reached 60%of households reached
participation (same as 2010)
Statewide program is newly
launched
Provisions of travel 2010 program funding levels Same as Scenario A,plus Same as Scenario B,plus better
options support tools allow for completion of sev- public-private partnerships to public-private data integration
eral new wayfinding signage create new online,print and and more resources for more
and bike rack projects on-street travel tools support tools
Estimated cost $99 million $124 million $234 million
(2014$)
C7.NA pin SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B 0
Recent Trends Adopted Plans New Plans and Policies
This scenario shows the results of This scenario shows the results of This scenario shows the results
implementing adopted land use and successfully implementing adopted of pursuing new policies, more
transportation plans to the extent plans and achieving the current investment and new revenue sources
possible with existing revenue. Regional Transportation Plan, which to more fully achieve adopted and
relies on increased revenue. emerging plans.
34 Shaping the preferred approach A discussicm wtirle'or poll(ymak4 is
EFFECTIVENESS OF
45% EMPLOYER COMMUTER
40% - PROGRAMS
l
35% (1997-2013)
30% — — The TriMet,Wilsonville SMART
and TMA employer outreach
25% ( — programs have made significant
20% —_______ _ progress with reducing drive-
alone trips.Since 1996,employee
15% -� commute trips that used non-
10% - -- drive-alone modes(transit,
• —! bicycling,walking,carpooling/
vanpooling and telecommuting)
rose from 20%to over 39%
'8 CO 2 O S N M �A cp / °p O) O — N c'�
$ 0 0 0 0 0 among participating employers.
- Q1 - N N 0 N aN N N N N N N N N (N N
Carpool —Transit Bike/Walk
Telecommute —Compressed Workweek Non-SOV Total
EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD
PROGRAMS
Community outreach programs such as Portland Sunday Parkways and
Wilsonville Sunday Streets encourage residents to use travel options by exploring
their neighborhoods on foot and bike without motorized traffic. Sunday Parkways
events have attracted 400,000 attendees since 2008 and the Wilsonville Sunday
Streets event attracted more than 5,000 participants in 2012.
Other examples of valuable community outreach and educational programs
include the Community Cycling Center's program to reduce barriers to biking
and Metro's Vamonos program,both of which provide communities across the
region with the skills and resources to become more active by walking,biking,
and using transit for their transportation needs.
In 2004,the City of Portland launched the Interstate TravelSmart
individualized marketing project in conjunction with the opening of the MAX
Yellow Line. Households that received individualized marketing made nearly
twice as many transit trips compared to a similar group of households that did
not participate in the marketing campaign. In addition, transit use increased
nearly 15 percent during the SmartTrips project along the MAX Green Line in
2010. Follow-up surveys show that household travel behavior is sustained for at
least two years after a project has been completed.
_ - - - 1 wow - -. -
.47 . _ _ .
gLa ,,. .1 __ wriarri...4-2. , i. ' . ' ) 1-Ali I
l 41-4 __ -45 nil w-
1_. :11 4 nig 4
-•-• 0 I Pi II r A.
0.-- ' , _ , . ,, , .„,
± - ' ' -f
r
Shaping the preferred approach' AiI-scti»ionp,uiilk•ti;r poli:5•int;kei> 35
What people are saying Emerging themes
• Incentives need to be marketed through
Tailored and personalized employers.
marketing campaigns can be • Travel information needs to be leveraged
more individualized - making electronically to take advantage of how many
people prefer to access and receive information,
them more effective. such as smart phone apps,the internet and
social media.
Success depends on the
• Information and marketing campaigns should
availability of transit and be culturally relevant,sensitive to different
other options. languages and cultures and respond to
changing demographics in the region.
Work trips are only 30% of • Incentives and investment in end-of-trip
all trips —so we need to focus facilities are important to encourage greater use
of commute options among employees,such
beyond work place campaigns. as secure bike parking,showers and changing
rooms for employees.
Key takeaways to share with others
. ................. . .... .... ... .
36 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide foi policymakurs
. ..,..:...: 7.
. �` •Ire} �, ;
. _ f
1
( 'V.A. - t,4. , • �' . l .%
RELATIVE CLIMATE BENEFIT Make biking and walking more safe
* * * and convenient
Active transportation is human-powered travel that engages people in
RELATIVE COST healthy physical activity while they go from place to place. Examples include
$ $ walking,biking,pushing strollers,using wheelchairs or other mobility
devices,skateboarding,and rollerblading.Active transportation is an essential
component of public transportation because most of these trips begin and end
with walking or biking.
Today, about 5o percent of the regional active transportation network is
complete. Nearly 18 percent of all trips in the region are made by walking and
biking,a higher share than many other places.Approximately 45 percent of all
trips made by car in the region are less than three miles and 15 percent are less
than one mile.With a complete active transportation network supported by
education and incentives,many of the short trips made by car could be replaced
by walking and biking. (See separate summary on providing information and
incentives to expand use of travel options.)
For active travel,transitioning between modes is easy when sidewalks and
bicycle routes are connected and complete,wayfinding is coordinated,and
transit stops are connected by sidewalks and have shelters and places to sit.
Biking to work and other places is supported when bicycles are accommodated
on transit vehicles,safe and secure bicycle parking is available at transit
shelters and community destinations,and adequate room is provided for
walkers and bicyclists on shared pathways. Regional trails and transit function
better when they are integrated with on-street walking and biking routes.
•
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• increases access to jobs and services • major gaps exist in walking and
• provides low-cost travel options biking routes across the region
• supports economic development,local • gaps in the active transportation
businesses and tourism network affect safety,convenience
• increases physical activity and reduces and access to transit
health care costs • many would like to walk or bike but
• reduces air pollution and air toxics feel unsafe
• reduces risk of traffic fatalities and • many lack access to walking and
injuries biking routes
• limited dedicated funding is
declining
•
Shaping the preferred approach Adiscussion guide foipoI yndkess 37
How much of the planned active transportation
network should we complete by 2035?
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AT A GLANCE
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B
0
Completion of Federally funded planning ' Same as Scenario A,plus Same as Scenario B,plus full
regional active and capital projects reflecting planned off-street trails build-out of planned off-street
transportation existing funding are largely and on-street sidewalk and , trails,on-street sidewalk
network dedicated to transit and road bikeway projects,such as and bikeway projects,and
investments bicycle lanes,cycle tracks, : improvements to existing
bicycle boulevards,sidewalks facilities
and crossing improvements '
included in financially con- '
strained RTP
Trails 38%completed 79%completed 100%completed
Bikeways 63%completed 84%completed ' 100%completed
Sidewalks 54%completed 62%completed 100%completed
Estimated cost $57 million $948 million $3.9 billion
(2014$)
SCENARIO
Bikeways,
Scenario A d —Sidewalks, Urban center
A { &Trails Employment
RECENT TRENDS 0 ,; UGB
Active transportation *�,,,4 f r, •
County line
Recent Trends , ��, ° '
This scenario'"'^,„
shows the results 8 z '"��
of implementing Fo orMr �� 1 ,4 "E"-."4 j i
Hillsboro o.` cedar
adopted land use and Grow "ii4 Min _. "�^�
`.'� of Forvi a rwid.k kf transportation plans l ` . t -. a, E _ ; I l over q�
to the extent possible
with existing revenue. I e. a w
n wi�,n T
1 NY
Wa ington �r'M ,a+ a,,�
58 Square a
Estimated lives w,.«* I .
Morrry/Salvlis rd F -
saved annually from I -. Clackamas wk., -
increased physical ' _\ Eng D'^•exus
C� E
activity by 2035 e
TJ -
CLIMATE regon Li.,
p 1
Note These maps are for S MART - ` lit
research purposes only COMMUNITIES
and do not reflect current _ .; 'Iwnviae a
or future policy decisions
of the Metro Council, l► .\[.:n
MPAC or JPACT. Date 3/25/2014 a j
38 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policymakers
/ 7" SCENARIO
Scenario B Bikeways,
Sidewalks, Urban center
Trails Employment
ADOPTED PLANS
Planned ATP UGB
4 Network
Active Transportation '�•ti 4 County line
,t
J }, Adopted Plans
St ro `
ioAmk C
O1"^a,BU \ This scenario
tea,,'S1 Z Nf,,,, 0„"fie
I a„" shows the results
6BIha"
�, f / . of successfully
oren,�
°o`��.— ,rnba,Q F wow implementing
�•�5 a rMrvKw' adopted plans
uonz tans Po land rit�m
4IT? and achieving the
eu n rya SE _ r 7
t^ q,k,9,--- w a� current Regional
m Hills Hillsdale tents I �r Transportation
..ii; 1NasRl gton vlea,;nr o
$t4uar�
val "°'° _st Plan, which relies
Pori
—� ,... on increased
aY�lr
Murray/SrhoS Tlyaid E\Elackaq,as My X revenue.
;�pp
later OamaKm
N,n9 (,io.r
. '"' 89
a ,..,:r.:..---- o `Easton` Estimated lives
tverS
,wa`�p w�l: -r` saved annually from
I'ion
CLIMATE 3 ,`°t 4 increased physical
SMART '1.� I ' r s activity by 2035
COMMUNITIES s
SCENARIOS PROJECT +'I4irivi11e s
Metro
` Bikeways,Sidewalks, 1 SCENARIO
Scenario C &Trails Urban center
Completed
NEW PLANS & —network Employment
POLICIES ,„ UGB
County we
0
Active Transportation 9 ` New Plans
s ``4� j and Policies
;P:Zi;V` '-� r"«,4^"' This scenario
`'y �A� i ZIMit,.� ,� , ,..„ shows the results
• �: Hind i/t��h' ,� �d. ` •. �' .t:_:c±�.4:a r- of pursuing new
P .�
Pr
ta`r,�:.4 ,.r ,41k- IA?�'' la-:!•ai,_.r i:vrs- _ " �a� policies, more
..1� tlr-�►`��� ` ,- :1.1!n►14+1a 11 ' investment and new•
'` tT 't::: revenue sources to
,,} �,� nti a_Q `/1 � �t more fully achieve
�� T
P'���� � `" ""� adopted and
his te, 2B, emerging plans.
. r,awsrh. , T4 '�, a r`i F - 1 IPA%d�Virliky.*.,111 MN 2... ,,, 116
�,� Estimated lives
��� saved annually from
�!!�"'r>+1 �r increased physical
CLIMATE �, s r 6 activity by 2035
SMART �'!� 1�.�
COMMUNITIES 11r�
SCENARIOS PROJECT rJle '�
fl
Metro
Shaping the preferred approach I A disrussiun guide for pol icy makers 39
What people are saying Emerging themes
• A high priority for nearly all communities
Bike improvements should be and interest groups because it provides many
strategic and provide convenient, benefits,particularly improved public health
and access.
efficient access to places people • Investments should focus on completing gaps
want to go. and making street crossings more safe.
• More dedicated,separate paths for biking are
Make the healthy needed because some people will never feel safe
biking in vehicle traffic.
choice, the easy choice.
• "Complete streets"should include green
designs,such as bioswales and street trees,
as part of street design and a broader climate
adaptation strategy.
• Demographics are changing-as youth and
older adults choose to drive less, it is important
to invest more in active transportation options
that connect to transit and link neighborhoods
to services.
• A dedicated,stable funding source is needed.
Key takeaways to share with others
. .. ....... .. ... . .. .. .
40 Shaping the preferred approach I A dim uscion guide for polieymakers
%rot,
i;�� 'if r, ,',i ii,_ r- .1
'i Ii r -
'
• :-.1--!11- . - • -
, _ . . mialitIM". .-., • . ------- wok. ,
RELATIVE CLIMATE BENEFIT Make streets and highways more
* safe, reliable and connected
Today, nearly 45 percent of all trips in the region made by car are less than three
RELATIVE COST miles,and 15 percent are less than one mile. When road networks lack multiple
$ $ routes serving the same destinations, short trips must use major travel corridors
designed for freight and regional traffic,adding to congestion.
There are three key ways to make streets and highways more safe,reliable and
connected to serve longer trips across the region on highways,shorter trips on
arterial streets,and the shortest trips on local streets.
Maintenance and efficient operation of the existing road system Keeping
the road system in good repair and using information and technology to manage
travel demand and traffic flow help improve safety,and boost efficiency of the
existing system.With limited funding,more effort is being made to maximize
system operations prior to building new capacity in the region. (See separate
summaries describing the use of technology and information.)
Street connectivity Building a well-connected network of complete streets
including new local and major street connections shortens trips, improves
access to community and regional destinations,and helps preserve the capacity
and function of highways in the region for freight and longer trips.These
connections include designs that support walking and biking,and,in some
areas,provide critical freight access between industrial areas,intermodal
facilities and the interstate highway system.
Network expansion Adding lane miles to relieve congestion is an expensive
approach, and will not solve congestion on its own. Targeted widening of streets
and highways along with other strategies helps connect goods to market and
support travel across the region.
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• improves access to jobs,goods and • declining purchasing power of
services,boosting business revenue existing funding sources,growing
• creates jobs and stimulates maintenance backlog,and rising
development,boosting the economy construction costs
• reduces delay,saving businesses time • may induce more traffic
and money • potential community impacts,such
• reduces risk of traffic fatalities and as displacement and noise
injuries • concentration of air pollutants and air
• reduces emergency response time toxics in major travel corridors
•
Shaping the preferred approach A cl,tiui..,um t!c:ide•for pol.rynr, ker, 41
How much of the planned street and highway
network should we complete by 2035?
STREET AND HIGHWAYS AT A GLANCE
SCENARIO I SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B a
Arterials and Maintain the existing system Same as Scenario A,plus Same as Scenario B,plus ad-
freeways 1 and complete committed complete financially con- ditional projects in the RTP
projects strained RTP projects such as
• planned connections On-going regional traffic
to further build out the operations center monitoring
' regional street grid and and incident response patrols
improve access to industrial are deployed on area freeways
areas and freight facilities and major arterials adjacent
i • widening some major to freeways
streets and freeways to
address bottlenecks
Maintenance Some maintenance backlogs Fully meet maintenance and Same as Scenario B
grow preservation needs
Estimated capital 1 $162 million $8.8 billion $11.8 billion
cost(2014$)
SCENARIO r -Reconstruction Urban center\
Scenario A
o Employment
A RECENT TRENDS ••"New connection
UGB
Streets & highways °4,y —widening County line
Recent Trends .} •.m,
This scenario �'" 74'.
shows the results `° . „,• ""`�
of implementing '. w *E r.ti4
adopted land use and ` co,n.,, Hillsboro creme: • Cedar a.� Troutdale
transportation plans Sunset-• "''°rnsorq Eev,w�a IGateway Rockwood
to the extent possible Transit sit Portland t "yw`S
A101. Beaverton ..Rd S Gresham
SE ewes ems
with existing revenue. �, W,„••°
I ...an,
i Washington • HIM". Lents Pleasant 4,ti,r
9 Square yet we, 0,sF
X Portland
Lane miles added by Milwaukee • ? ,
un
2035 May/SuhoN T9ad Clackamas ,,,P,, F.
Laiur Ckwego ' Valley r,
King `. • Damascus
City r
•
Tualatin Gladstone
AP
snelwood / wnt;
u„n Oregon
CLIMATE
'44 City s
West
Em,
Note These maps are for SMART �\ f�'
research purposes only ‘
and do not reflect current COMMUNITIES wisp
SCENARIOS PROJECT
or future policy decisions
of the Metro Council, ®Metro
MPAC or JPACT. Date 4/4/1014.mm J
42 Shaping the preferred approach i A discussion guide for policyrnakers
Reconstruction Urban center SCENARIO
Scenario B
Employment
i ADOPTED PLANS -Newconnecfion use
Streets & highways : 1.4. —Widening
County line
Q
J CL � :-., Adopted Plans
' `" `� 1 This scenario
c- *c �:4..� r y "w4. shows the results
`�'L - �°
s«n �9 moo ti "rte of successfully
6ruvt„ . us Hills / a i..a_ �I,yw w, Ile implementing
-, w�^ • enwrlw<s, �iate�ay �«s = adopted plans
tl JIB_ se
B€a:ilf sEPo.raga s Irma. and achieving the
' a
µX <1" current Regional
Fwa ton WAidaM 4Ats Transportation
I tq ....� .. �� �xil. 4 sF Plan,which relies
a t._
Mk,„,s;. '•• on increased
su-ay/Sc it Clack`as revenue.uk.
1 81
\Etc....d.t.,. l' Lane miles added by
r„ " t y • ''erg 2035
CLIMATE ""''` f ' s
,t, t— \ j
SMART - :-_
COMMUNITIES .
SCENARIOS PROJECT w 1
eS!11en%)
DSt.4/4/2014-enS J
/ ---Reconstruction Urban center■ SCENARIO
Scenario C
NEW PLANS & •...New connection
Employment
POLICIES 1 IJGB
e —widenin
1.Streets & highways "`� 4 9 County line
43°
J �' New Plans
'° ."4'%...6.41:6"`' •� and Policies
1 s '! I w � •� "". This scenario
INC • i 3 '� ,w, ,«,..,.,, shows the results
-` ; . • of pursuing new
F-� lJ3-�-
- - s, "�" L'n°°— policies, more
^d f F c sha I .� investment and new
L s i' Powe"""1....
--- W�a Jk— I revenue sources to R.
I: 10'' _ Wash•ton'".,,�,r 01e _ , r' r more fully achieve
t R'•I a , ;S t4 e adopted and
M,-,,,,� 'll+__ *; emerging plans.
•�4un J C kaft
.. : .� • ` �I I.i. .,-, 105
` Lane miles added by
<\ \:::-„of Lane
CLIMATE
--IL
-' rx, (Oty B
s
SMART - __ / �� g
COMMUNITIES
SCENARIOS PROJECT fl
Metro
Ous 4/4/1014-mrh
Shaping the preferred approach 1 A;11sc tiloli p,uuiVV FIJI pulii ynlakeu 43
What people are saying Emerging themes
• Keeping existing roads and highways in good
Street and highway condition is a higher priority than adding
improvements are needed to help capacity or building new roads.
move freight more efficiently • Improved connectivity is a priority for suburban
to make the region more communities.
economically competitive. • Build a well-connected network of complete
streets that prioritize safe and convenient
Make road investments that pedestrian and bicycle access; respecting
improve access and efficiency existing communities and the natural
for all users—bike,pedestrian, environment.
auto,transit and freight.
• Maximize system operations by implementing
management strategies prior to building new
Investments in transit,walking a motor vehicle capacity,where appropriate.
biking can help freight move more
efficiently because they help reduce
the need to drive for some trips.
Key takeaways to share with others
44 Shaping the preferred approach I A d iu: i c oit guide for policymakcr:.
Y `
— i. ' . :e- 4.\1 ii''',. ,__.,....,._
.4
. , ..,,,, . . .......4_ , . —7 _ ".:"..- .;,:c.. _, '
jiligiii", .. r. ,4 16 _ ,- .7. .c."!"l'''' S
III i 1 i i
rte, r. .. . {.
F -_ow. 111 I- 4MM, '
RELATIVE CLIMATE BENEFIT Manage parking to make efficient
* * * * use of parking resources
Parking management refers to various policies and programs that result in more
RELATIVE COST efficient use of parking resources. Parking management is implemented through
city and county development codes.Managing parking works best when used in
a complementary fashion with other strategies; it is less effective in areas where
transit or bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure is lacking.
Planning approaches include conducting assessments of the parking supply to
better understand needs.A typical urban parking space has an annualized cost of
$600 to$1,200 to maintain,while structured parking construction costs averages
$15,000 per space.
On-street parking approaches include spaces that are timed,metered,
designated for certain uses or have no restriction.Examples of these different
approaches include charging long-term or short-term fees,limiting the length of
time a vehicle can park,and designating on-street spaces for preferential parking
for electric vehicles,carshare vehicles,carpools,vanpools,bikes,public use
(events or café"Street Seats")and freight truck loading/unloading areas.
Off-street parking approaches include providing spaces in designated areas,
unbundling parking,preferential parking(for vehicles listed above),shared
parking between land uses (for example, movie theater and business center),
park-and-ride lots for transit and carpools/vanpools,and parking garages in
downtowns and other mixed-use areas that allow surface lots to be developed
for other uses.
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• allows more land to be available for • inadequate information for motorists
development,generating local and on parking and availability
state revenue • inefficient use of existing parking
• reduces costs to governments, resources
businesses,developers and consumers . parking spaces that are inconvenient
• fosters public-private partnerships that to nearby residents and businesses
can result in improved streetscape for • scarce freight loading and unloading
retail and visitors areas
• generates revenues where parking is • low parking turnover rate
priced • lack of sufficient parking
• reduces air pollution and air toxics • parking oversupply,ongoing costs
and the need to free up parking for
customers
Shaping the preferred approach; i\;l1,.c ti 'um 1 111111 lot poi:cyul,ilu i, 45
How should local communities manage parking
by 2035?
PARKING MANAGEMENT AT A GLANCE
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
A I B I 0
Parking Existing locally-adopted Same as Scenario A,plus Same as Scenario B,plus
management development codes remain communities expand the communities expand the
the same as 2010 flexibility of development flexibility of development
codes and develop parking codes to support public-
Large employers offer prefer- plans for all downtown private partnerships in areas
ential parking and centers served by high served by 10-minute transit
capacity transit as assumed in service
Free parking is available in adopted RTP
most areas Medium-size employers offer
Parking facilities are sized 'I preferential parking
and managed so spaces are •
frequently occupied,travelers Local codes allow for
have information on parking unbundled parking
and travel options,and some
businesses share parking Free and timed parking is
available in some areas
Free and timed parking is
available in many areas
SCENARIO
Scenario A ` Level of parking management
A Most Urban center
RECENT TRENDS ( Employment
Managing parking �. least UGB
ou
J � • County line
Recent Trends �„_ 4 '""`
This scenario \ w "'�
shows the results / I - . - .0 Iz y_
of implementing I ! «w., i r fil adopted land use and ' ! ._r '�' M''� _ °
Giwt.._ ConMrn Hillsboro - _ - •-- Vtiv \- `—
transportation plans i i-- ___. _ J ." a0/'�- - �r - r , j
with existing revenue. Beaverton . •+ -----.E.,...4- ,- _ - }
13%work trips { '17„..."7-_ )_ f. %.40,.
g
8%other trips -.___ I ,, �. 4 s• `
Estimated share of ___-_Idw.r/stndb r h. 1 _`�)' CI@cka .'' „ vr�� -.�'ti.
trips to areas with �° '8° - .evbt
actively managed _
parking % \ �� '�,
CLIMATE :
p SMART ``> / � 8
Note These maps are for
research purposes only
COMMUNITIES - _,--- ) {/ i
and do not reflect current scenarios PROJECT l
or future policy decisions r ` 1 / I
of the Metro Council, 1 1ierro C /
MPAC or 5PACT. t' l� i Date`2/14/2014 inrh }
46 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policymakers
7-- r , (
Scenario B Level of parking management' SCENARIO
Most urban center
■
ADOPTED PLANS \ Employment B UGB
Managing parking ti — Least County line
�— `� a_ � ---`1 4 ; a... Adopted Plans
i'` {
w This scenario
1 shows the results
/ I M,e 2-
`.,„,..na �\ �'��_ of successfully
" ��"�
_ «F '"; *Own.a implementing
r� urn& s Hillsboro - Cedar
,
1,__j _ .Ib �`�•ill �ti W t 'a-A-
,e�e' ' � adopted plans
aie/ F ie. s' - _ l and achieving the
y } \\ �r�''� 'd _ _.7-7....,17...., �'1 current Regional
`! Ha w„' Transportation
• MI 7 .,Fete ,Q n Plan, which relies
ice- �� s "' w '-
�,- ti__ _ d a on increased
I ,� V L '. N revenue.
�' ��11udy,,.. ha. l ; 'ClOCk ,� �aai,
u �L ,
J ` - ' -
.7 °''"�`"� 30%work trips
.., f �_, 30%other trips
rr
Sherwood _ `
Estimated share of
•
CLIMATE ', 1" trips to areas with
SMART - � � actively managed
COMMUNITIES ^� parking
SCENARIOS PROJECT _
Metro r/ �� - a L
! it 01eznvzal+- t,
Scenario C Level of parking managements SCENARIO
NEW PLANS& Most Urban center
0
POLICIES Employment
Managing parking °t UGB
y Least
County line
` 4 New Plans
+ � and Policies
\ ---„,,,,,,,,,„,>.1 This scenario
g �`°'' - r shows the results
Ir �-
,,E ._ ryo of pursuing new
'IF MNu,
Hillsboro
-.MUM ar __I` _ •�, ,. `'4- - �TtaAtw'.: Policies, more
ii?lt -- A ✓N, Fairview
� investment and new
J-
f__ e. ' ,�, . Y_ -__ t`' revenue sources to•
A -� �' -^\� more fully achieve
—� f on I, �_ ,, Awga adopted and I y--- - emerging plans.
(, `1� o,T, \ I
F .ay;StfiWF ' '�
i-___-/-- / , . ,2_.. -AIL \ CV••-, - _- \� 50%work trips
a yyl�7jj}}II'' / - - •°"'"_`�` 50% other trips
TWb;,n r� �1e, I . t ter• Estimated share of
5,, ,,,1 i 1 trips to areas with
CLIMATE �"
I F�`°'� e actively managed
SMART ---_ - �„, + , parking
+ 1
COMMUNITIES i )' 'l g
SCENARIOS PROJECT ( \ . . '
//`� 1
®1�'1Ci1(T / i
I Date.2/14/701+•me,
Shaping the preferred approach I A:It,1 tI slc,n/,ludo•fnl p1.I 11 ynl,ikt , 47
What people are saying Emerging themes
• Parking management is the most controversial
"Free parking" is never free — it's and lowest priority for most interest groups
just a question of how it is being and residents.
subsidized and by whom. • Many people agree that parking management
solutions should be flexible and tailored by
each community to fit local needs.
Parking fees can have a
• Parking management needs to begin with data
disproportionate impact on about what the needs are,what might work,
drivers with limited incomes. and available travel options in the area.
• Implementation of parking management may
require broadening how parking problems
and solutions are addressed and activities to
improve enforcement and addressing potential
spillover impacts.
• If paid parking is implemented,there needs
to be a corresponding investment in transit
and other travel options so that people have
choices.
Key takeaways to share with others
48 Shaping the preferred approach I A disc us Siong,uidc lot pnlirvn,.iktis
1 I • i
' � . �- 1 So
ii i
Iii-r '
/ ''1 14011 '
RELATIVE CLIMATE BENEFIT Identify potential ways to pay for
N/A our investment choices
Transportation funding has long been primarily a federal and state
RELATIVE COST responsibility,financed largely through gas taxes and other user fees. However,
N/A the purchasing power of federal and state gas tax revenues is declining as
individuals drive less and fuel efficiency increases.The effectiveness of this
revenue source is further eroded as the gas tax is not indexed to inflation.
Diminished resources mean reduced ability to expand,improve and maintain
existing transportation infrastructure. Federal and state funding is not keeping
pace with infrastructure operation and maintenance needs,so a substantial share
of funding for future RTP investments has shifted to local revenue sources.
Local governments in Oregon have increasingly turned to tax levies, road
maintenance fees,system development charges and traffic impact fees in
attempt to keep pace,although some communities have been more successful
than others. Expansion and operation of the transit system has relied heavily
on payroll taxes and competitive federal funding for high capacity transit
capital projects. But the region's demand for frequent and reliable transit service
exceeds the capacity of the payroll tax to support it.
The adopted Regional Transportation Plan calls for stabilizing existing
transportation revenue sources while securing new and innovative long-
term sources of funding adequate to build,operate and maintain the regional
transportation system for all modes of travel.
•
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• transforms community visions into • declining purchasing power of
reality existing funding sources due to
• improves access to jobs,goods and inflation and improvement in fuel
services,boosting business revenues efficiency
• creates jobs and stimulates • potential disproportionate impact of
development,boosting the regional higher taxes and fees on drivers with
economy limited travel options
• reduces delay,saving businesses time • limited public support for higher fees
and money and taxes
• reduces air pollution and air toxics • patchwork of funding sources
• reduces risk of traffic fatalities and • statutory or constitutional limitations
injuries on how different funding sources can
be raised or used
Shaping the preferred approach 1 A discirssiun guide for policymakers 49
How should we pay for our investment choices
by 2035?
FUNDING MECHANISMS AT A GLANCE
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B 0
Recent Trends Adopted Plans New Plans and Policies
Overview of revenue Revenues from existing Same as Scenario A,plus Same as Scenario B,plus
sources sources at 2012 levels additional federal,state and additional federal,state and
local revenues as assumed in local revenues assumed in the
the financially constrained full RTP,plus new user-based
RTP fees
Gas tax Federal and state gas taxes Same as Scenario A,plus Same as Scenario A,but state
are 18 cents and 3o cents per the state gas tax increases gas tax is replaced by a fee
gallon,respectively by So.o1 per year to cover based on miles driven
growing operations,
Multnomah and Washington maintenance and
counties levy a per gallon preservation(OMP)costs at
gas tax and share revenue the state,regional and local
with the cities within their level
boundaries'
Four cities-Tigard,
Milwaukie,Happy Valley and
Cornelius-implement a gas
tax that is predominately
used for maintenance'
Mileage-based road None None $0.03 per mile(the equivalent
use fee of the Scenario B state gas tax
assumption)
Carbon fee None None S50 per ton
Potential revenues $5.6 billion $6.5 billion $15.2 billion
generated(2014$)
from gas tax,road
use fee and carbon
fee
Other potential Existing federal,state and $15 billion $22 billion
revenues from RTP local revenues at 2012 levels
sources(capital only) Scenario A,plus additional Scenario B,plus additional
federal,state and local federal,state and local
revenues at financially revenues at full RTP levels
constrained RTP levels
Not accounted for in potential revenues generated,but included in the Regional Transportation Plan financial assumptions for local road-
related operations,maintenance and preservation.
50 Shaping the preferred approach A ills;utisini;i;uids `.;,ipnlk:ii:;al<<^s
FUNDING MECHANISMS ASSUMED IN 2014 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
PLAN AND POTENTIAL NEW FUNDING MECHANISMS FOR CONSIDERATION
SOURCE
EXISTING FUNDING MECHANISM Federal State Local
Federal Highway Trust Fund'
•
Federal Transit Fund •
Gas tax • • •
Vehicle fees(e.g. registration, licensing fees) • •
Heavy truck weight-mile fee
Local portion of State Highway Trust Fund' r •
Development-based fees'
•
Payroll tax •
Transit passenger fares Il •
Special funds and levies' •
Tolls (1-5 Columbia River Crossing) ! •
POTENTIAL NEW FUNDING MECHANISM
Carbon fee • i is
Mileage-based road user fee • •
'The Federal Highway Trust Fund includes federal gas tax receipts and other revenue.
'The State Highway Trust Fund includes state gas tax receipts,vehicle fees and heavy truck weight-mile fees.
3Development-based fees include system development charges,traffic impact fees,urban renewal districts and
developer contributions.
"Special funds and levies include tax levies(e.g.Washington County MSTIP), local improvement districts,
vehicle parking fees,transportation utility fees and maintenance districts(e.g.Washington County Urban Road
Maintenance District).
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 3e/$19 VRF
FUNDING MECHANISMS MULTNOMAH
(2013
2 • ,r,e 10 • • A TRO•ALE
i
F[ :ST GRUB. HIIJ SBORO PORTr.ND
i:OR NF WOOD VILLAGE
• GRF•A7
BEAVE.RT1ON
• IF + IC 4 Z 0 3e I 2 0$ • 2,
WASHINGTON TIGARD nuLWALTCIE
HAPPY VALLEY
F • • Bernet UNiy Fr.
;LAD: NE
T!ALATIN 1071 . • s,,...eo..r6P.,,r..
■
WEST'LJNN
S)1ERW'UOp . (hairy Fruriiw Ike
L .I/IPrurl M.r6.
Mrrrr.�r�s Are.
p ill OREGON CITY
YRSUIV�q u . Prop..,T°/lay
• A Parkin r"*.
CLACKAMAS Mruo Boundary
Gamey Line
r
Shaping the preferred approach I A discusslun guule for poi icy oral,et 51
What people are saying Emerging themes
• User-based funding mechanisms had more
The gas tax is not a sustainable support so the fees are directly connected to the
funding mechanism - alternatives service received.
are needed. • Prioritize limited funding on investments that
achieve multiple goals.
The greatest barrier to • More state funding is needed to leverage local
and regional funding.
implementation is the lack
• Implementation of fees should take into account
of sufficient funding.
the ability of people with limited incomes to pay
and the other options available.
• More funding should be dedicated to low carbon
travel options;current statutes limit how some
funding sources can be used.
Key takeaways to share with others
. . .. .......... . . . . .
52 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for polio/maker:,
,-,...iatftig,A,,../....‘-' 1:z.-,-,-_, .- ,,---m,..,,-.....--r,.1, ,:- FF - - .e-y ,,MI—v.,,— -,,,•-• .,
41! s.,,,:,r1.- -• ' -.--..--f- .17.1.-o- '.- .:- 2 .' _„ .---..714':,Ni.' :-.'2'7,7'"'21.•17-:-- .....4'''.!',Irt%?......"'.:,-_,r,k- z:.-0;a:-.44p; -43 A---- -:.-12,._ - • , . _ .. ___ __
,t---.. -- ,,. ."4,:r . - §vsirine4).7.-ti 1 •, — 7-7 -"•-• •... ... - 17- -•-•.••••:.--41 - '-‘7'."' ..,-A 'Ar-- 0':',''... •t.'..147.„7 or:.;;I-14:
_...7' 4..!. .'`.1,,--;--i.:Vtat.. ,,z, ..,_ .....„ ,
-..,....y...,,,-..-.,-,.,
,--v-, ,. iir•,..-p ii-. it-44:. .... . • ,-. ,o‘ul -,, - ...- . - - ..--- , .....--.+3,.:4 i.-s■-' ,-, -- r— . -,-,,J
- -- A 2 ... • 4 '', -'- ' '-- -.*- , -'.---a"... T-': `:-."'' • ''7- "-' Z , '-.- , ,-- 4 "Wl
t
- . .,...
I .
111.„
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
•
B
A _
•
. ,
,. .
. r 1 ' I 1, . .
.' ,. ■111111111/11/1111
•
PHASE 2: SELECTED RESULTS
AT A GLANCE
The scenarios tested are for research purposes only and do not necessarily Discussion points:
reflect current or future policy decisions of the Metro Council,MPAC or JPACT. • Adopted plans help
reduce how far people
WHAT WE LEARNED ABOUT TRAVEL drive and time spent in
AND MOBILITY traffic.
• Adopted plans provide
opportunities for more
%DAILY VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED people living and
PER PERSON working in centers
and corridors;a more
SCENARIO A 1 / MILES connected road system;
SCENARIO B 16 MILES using technology such
as traffic signal timing;
SCENARIO C 14 MILES clearing incidents more
quickly;more transit and
walking and biking all
help the transportations
OTIME SPENT IN TRAFFIC system operate more
efficiently which in turn
% OF LIGHT VEHICLE TRAVEL TIME SPENT IN TRAFFIC
helps save time spent in
SCENARIO A traffic.
SCENARIO B 1 70/0 • Adopted plans reduce
the amount of time spent
SCENARIO C 13% in traffic by 20 percent
over recent trends.
• Reduced delay is
expected to support
goods movement,job
creation and the region's
economy.
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide lot policyinakers 53
Discussion points: •• WHAT WE LEARNED ABOUT PUBLIC HEALTH
• All scenarios improve AND SAFETY
health outcomes by
improving air quality GAIR POLLUTANTS
and increasing physical
activity. METRIC TONS PER DAY
• Improving air quality
and increasing the
number of people who SCENARIO B (1
regularly exercise by SCENARIO C 1 2 0
choosing to bike and
walk to community
destinations can reduce
chronic diseases and •PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IMPROVES HEALTH
premature deaths, and PER PERSON PER YEAR
lower health care costs.
• Adopted plans increase -
the level of physicalNA> o A
activity over recent
trends,saving nearly go 160 BIKE MILES
lives annually by 2035. SCENARIO B 190 WALKING TRIPS
• Adopted plans reduce 190 BIKE MILES
air pollutants by at least SCENARIO C 200 WALKING TRIPS
10 metric tons per day
over recent trends;an
important health benefit
of greenhouse gas OLESS AIR POLLUTION, MORE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
reduction. & IMPROVED SAFETY HELP SAVE LIVES
• Reductions in per capita LIVES SAVED EACH YEAR BY 2035
vehicle miles traveled
improve traffic safety in
all scenarios. SCENARIO B 9 8
• Further investment can SCENARIO C 1 3 3
significantly improve
these outcomes.
54 Shaping the preferred approach I Adiscussion guide toi pal irymakers
WHAT WE LEARNED ABOUT THE ECONOMY Discussion points:
• Adopted plans reduce
the environmental
OUR ECONOMY BENEFITS FROM costs associated with air
REDUCED EMISSIONS pollution,vehicle fluids
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS IN 2035 and severe storms,and
(MILLIONS, 2005$)
flooding and drought
$800 MILLION expected from climate
SAVED BY 2035, Si 7 BILLION change.
COMPARED TO A SAVED BY 2035, g
COMPARED TO A • Adopted plans reduce
$sos the amount of time
$434 freight trucks spend
in traffic over recent
SCENARIO A SCENARIO B SCENARIO C trends.
• Freight truck travel cost
savings can be passed
on to businesses and
BUSINESSES AND OUR ECONOMY consumers.
4. BENEFIT FROM REDUCED DELAY • Further investment can
ANNUAL FREIGHT TRUCK COSTS DUE TO increase these savings
DELAY IN 2035 (MILLIONS, 2005$) from reduced emissions
5800 MILLION and delay.
SAVED BY 2035, 51.5 BILLION y
•
•
COMPARED TO A SAVED BY 2035.
COMPARED TO A
$925 $869
SCENARIO A SCENARIO B SCENARIO C
Shaping the preferred approach A dlst;ISSRnI l!II Itk tot pc>I is y1) kt'ls 55
Discussion points: WHAT WE LEARNED ABOUT HOUSEHOLD
• Adopted plans can COSTS
reduce the average
annual vehicle
d16 laii°
OVERALL VEHICLE - RELATED TRAVEL COSTS
ownership and 1 DECREASE DUE TO LOWER OWNERSHIP COSTS
OperatingCOStSOV2I AVERAGE ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE OWNERSHIP
& OPERATING COSTS
recent trends. $8,200 $8,100
• Vehicle ownership $7,400
$2,700 $3,000 -VEHICLE
costs decrease as $3.200 OPERATING COST`
households drive less
and own fewer vehicles. -VEHICLE
$5,500 $5,100 OWNERSHIP COSTS
• Scenario C results in $4,200
the lowest vehicle costs,
which helps reduce SCENARIO A SCENARIO B SCENARIO C
the share of household
income spent on
vehicle travel for all
households,including LOWER VEHICLE COSTS HELP
households with ° ° HOUSEHOLD BUDGETS
limited incomes. SHARE. OF ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME SPENT ON VEHICLE TRAVEL
23% LOW-INCOME
HOUSEHOLDS
SCENARIO B 18 MEDIAN-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
20 ,' LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
SCENARIO C 1600 MEDIAN-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
56 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for pofirymakers
PHASE 2:
TRANSIT ACCESS AT A GLANCE
HOUSEHOLD ACCESS TO TRANSIT AT A GLANCE
Share of total households within 1/4-mile of transit
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
I
A B 0
SERVICE Daytime Daytime Daytime
FREQUENCY Rush hour &evening Rush hour &evening Rush hour &evening
Every 10 minutes 24% 4% 27% 4% G 32% 20%
11-15 minute service 20% 29% 21% 32% 17% 18%
16-25 minute service 9% ' _ 5% j 8% 4% ; 9% 7%
More than 26 minute ! 1
service 18% 28% 17% I — 28% 16% 26%
No fixed-route service 29% 34% 27% 32% , 26% 29%
LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLD ACCESS TO TRANSIT AT A GLANCE
Share of low-income households*within '/4-mile of transit
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B 0
SERVICE Daytime Daytime Daytime
FREQUENCY Rush hour &evening Rush hour &evening Rush hour
&evening
Every 10 minutes 31% 5% 34% 5% 40% 26%
11-15 minute service ' 26% _ I - 39°10 26% i 42% i v 22% 23%
16-25 minute service 8°� 6% 7% 1 5% 7% 7%_
More than 26 minute ' ilv
service 16% 28% 15% 1 27% 14% I 24%
No fixed-route service 19% 22% 18% 21% I 17% 20%
$24.999 per year or less
JOB ACCESS TO TRANSIT AT A GLANCE
Share of jobs within '/4-mile of transit
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
A B 0
SERVICE Daytime Daytime Daytime
FREQUENCY Rush hour &evening Rush hour &evening Rush hour
&evening
Every to minutes 31% 6% 33% 6% 42% 23%
11-15 minute service 19% 35% 22% 38% 17% 25%
16-25 minute service 12% 4% 9% 3% 9% 7%
More than 26 minute I
service 22% 33% 20% 32% 17% 26%
No fixed-route service 16% 22% 16% 21% 15% 19%
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policyrrrtkers 57
PHASE 2:
ASSUMPTIONS AT A GLANCE
March 30, 2014
Phase 2: 2010 base year and alternative scenario inputs
The inputs are for research -
purposes only and do not 2010 2035 I
represent current or future
policy decisions of the Metro .
Council. Base Year Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C
Reflects existing Recent trends Adopted plans New plans and policies
Strategy conditions
Households in mixed use 26% 36% 37% 37%
areas(percent)
Urban growth boundary 2010 UGB 28,000 acres 12,000 acres 12,000 acres
expansion (acres)
Drive alone trips under 10 miles 9% 10% 15% 20%
that shift to bike(percent)
Transit service
(daily revenue hours) 4,900 5,600 6,200 11,200
(RTP Financially Constrained) (RTP State+more transit)
Work/non work trips in areas with 13% /8% 13% /8% 30% /30% 50% /50%
parking management(percent)
Pay-as-you-drive insurance 100%percen40%of households participating) 0% 20% 40
Gas tax(cost per gallon 2005$) $0.42 $0.48 $0.73 $0.18
Road user fee(cost per mile) $0 $0 $0 $0.03
Carbon emissions fee(cost per ton) $0 $0 $0 $50
58 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide foi policymakers
March 30, 2014
The inputs are for research
purposes only and do not
represent current or future 2010 2035
Cpolicy decisions of the Metro
ouncil. Base Year Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C
Reflects existing Recent trends Adopted plans New plans and policies
Strategy conditions
Households participating in eco- 0% 0% 30% 60%
a driving (percent)
'421 participating
cp' in individualized marketing 9% 30% 30% 60%
6 programs(percent)
'o Workers articipatin in
employer-based commuter 20% 20% 20% 40%
gn programs (percent)
Carsharing in high density areas One carshare per Twice the number Four times the
°' f rate) y 5000 vehicles of carshare vehicles Same as Scenario A number of carshare
(participa ion ra e) available vehicles available
R
areas(panic in on rat)enslty 05000 vehicleser Same as today of carshare number s Same as Scenario B
IFreeway and arterial N/A 9 miles 81 miles 105 miles
expansion (lane miles added) (RTP Financially Constrained) (RIP State)
Delay reduced by traffic 10% 10% 20% 35%
management strategies(percent)
Fleet mix(percent) auto: 57% auto: 71%
light truck: 43% light truck: 29%
Fleet turnover rate 10 years 8 years
Fuel economy(miles per gallon) auto: 29.2 mpg auto: 68.5 mpg
light truck: 20.9 mpg light truck: 47.7 mpg
e , Carbon intensity of fuels 90 g CO2e/megajoule 72 g CO2e/megajoule
Plug-in hybrid electric/all electric auto: 0% ! 1% auto: 8% /26%
~ vehicles(percent) light truck: 0%/ 1% light truck: 2% / 26%
Shaping the preferred approach A discussion guide for poi icy makers 59
GLOSSARY
Carsharing A model similar to a car rental where a member user rents cars for short periods of
time, often by the hour. Such programs are attractive to customers who make only occasional use
of a vehicle,as well as others who would like occasional access to a vehicle of a different type than
they use day-to-day.The organization renting the cars may be a commercial business or the users
may be organized as a company,public agency,cooperative,or peer-to-peer. Zipcar and car2go are
local examples.
Eco-driving A combination of public education,in-vehicle technology and driving practices that
result in more efficient vehicle operation and reduced fuel consumption and emissions. Examples
of eco-driving practices include avoiding rapid starts and stops,matching driving speeds to
synchronized traffic signals,and avoiding idling. Program are targeted to those without travel
options and traveling longer distances.
Employer-based commute programs Work-based travel demand management programs
that can include transportation coordinators,employer-subsidized transit pass programs,ride-
matching,carpool and vanpool programs,telecommuting,compressed or flexible work weeks and
bicycle parking and showers for bicycle commuters.
Fleet mix The percentage of vehicles classified as automobiles compared to the percentage
classified as light trucks(weighing less than 10,000 lbs.);light trucks make up 43 percent of the
light-duty fleet today.
Fleet turnover The rate of vehicle replacement or the turnover of older vehicles to newer vehicles;
the current turnover rate in Oregon is io years.
Greenhouse gas emissions According to the Environmental Protection Agency,gases that trap
heat in the atmosphere are called greenhouse gases emissions. Greenhouse gases that are created
and emitted through human activities include carbon dioxide (emitted through the burning of
fossil fuels),methane,nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases. For more information see www.epa.gov/
climatechange.
GreenSTEP GreenSTEP is a new model developed to estimate GHG emissions at the individual
household level. It estimates greenhouse gas emissions associated with vehicle ownership,
vehicle travel, and fuel consumption,and is designed to operate in a way that allows it to show
the potential effects of different policies and other factors on vehicle travel and emissions.
Metropolitan GreenSTEP travel behavior estimates are made irrespective of housing choice or
supply; the model only considers the demand forecast components-household size,income and
age-and the policy areas considered in this analysis.
60 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policymakerr.
House Bill 2001 (Oregon Jobs and Transportation Act) Passed by the Legislature in 2009,
this legislation provided specific directions to the Portland metropolitan area to undertake
scenario planning and develop two or more land use and transportation scenarios by 2012 that
accommodate planned population and employment growth while achieving the GHG emissions
reduction targets approved by LCDC in May 2011. Metro,after public review and consultation with
local governments,is to adopt a preferred scenario. Following adoption of a preferred scenario,the
local governments within the Metro jurisdiction are to amend their comprehensive plans and land
use regulations as necessary to be consistent with the preferred scenario. For more information go
to:http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/lawsstatutes/2009orLawo865.html
Individualized marketing Travel demand management programs focused on individual
households. IM programs involve individualized outreach to households that identify household
travel needs and ways to meet those needs with less vehicle travel.
Light vehicles Vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or less,and include cars,light trucks,sport
utility vehicles,motorcycles and small delivery trucks.
Low Carbon Fuel Standard In 2009, the Oregon legislature authorized the Environmental
Quality Commission to develop low carbon fuel standards (LCFS)for Oregon. Each type of
transportation fuel (gasoline,diesel, natural gas,etc.)contains carbon in various amounts. When
the fuel is burned, that carbon turns into carbon dioxide (CO2),which is a greenhouse gas.The goal
is to reduce the average carbon intensity of Oregon's transportation fuels by 10 percent below 2010
levels by 2022 and applies to the entire mix of fuel available in Oregon.Carbon intensity refers
to the emissions per unit of fuel; it is not a cap on total emissions or a limit on the amount of fuel
that can be burned.The lower the carbon content of a fuel,the fewer greenhouse gas emissions it
produces.
Pay-as-you-drive insurance (PAYD) This pricing strategy converts a portion of liability and
collision insurance from dollars-per-year to cents-per-mile to charge insurance premiums based
on the total amount of miles driven per vehicle on an annual basis and other important rating
factors,such as the driver's safety record. If a vehicle is driven more,the crash risk consequently
increases. PAYD insurance charges policyholders according to their crash risk.
Oregon Sustainable Transportation Initiative (OSTI) An integrated statewide effort to reduce
GHG emissions from the transportation sector by integrating land use and transportation. Guided
by stakeholder input, the initiative has built collaborative partnerships among local governments
and the state's six Metropolitan Planning Organizations to help meet Oregon's goals to reduce GHG
emissions.The effort includes five main areas:Statewide Transportation Strategy development,
GHG emission reduction targets for metropolitan areas,land use and transportation scenario
planning guidelines,tools that support MPOs and local governments and public outreach. For
more information,go to www.oregon.gov/odot/td/osti
Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policymakers 61
Scenario A term used to describe a possible future,representing a hypothetical set of strategies or
sequence of events.
Scenario planning A process that tests different actions and policies to see their affect on GHG
emissions reduction and other quality of life indicators.
Statewide Transportation Strategy The strategy,as part of OSTI,will define a vision for Oregon
to reduce its GHG emissions from transportation systems,vehicle and fuel technologies and
urban form by 2050. Upon completion,the strategy will be adopted by the Oregon Transportation
Commission. For more information go to:http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/OSTI/STS.shtm1.
System efficiency Strategies that optimize the use of the existing transportation system,
including traffic management,employer-based commute programs, individualized marketing and
carsharing.
Traffic incident management A coordinated process to detect,respond to,and remove traffic
incidents from the roadway as safely and quickly as possible,reducing non-recurring roadway
congestion.
Traffic management Strategies that improve transportation system operations and efficiency,
including ramp metering, active traffic management, traffic signal coordination and real-time
traveler information regarding traffic conditions, incidents,delays, travel times,alternate routes,
weather conditions,construction,or special events.
62 Shaping the preferred approach I A discussion guide for policymakers
, ;T.'1b•d"� W �'` . 4}r -- ._'a' '' };! ..•1- ' -_ . ..y •* ,' 4-,•:'...7--'.....' ,;r-65-+-'r ,•a' c _'.ivy ie tir,1 '.
• ' ,
Metro Policy Advisory Committee(MPAC) i... �'r. '1c- �.:F#' `_ . ,47-'1;.:.:-.-•t . .� .. -� x `.
Jody Carson,City of West Linn, MPAC Chair �, -N .. 's ? ' ..: - �t" "
Pete Truax,City of Forest Grove, First Vice-Chair - 4 _ `7 * -,-....f. ' `-:' :'.'-'`` -- =.f_:'=`.. • ^ -
Tim Clark,City of Troutdale, Second Vice-Chair fa _ . w ..
Loretta Smith, Multnomah County - - . •
Jerry Hinton, City of Gresham
L10 Charlie Hales, City of Portland
r Martha Shrader, Clackamas County
Kent Studebaker, City of Lake Oswego
it Dick Jones,Oak Lodge Water District
• .
r Jerry Willey, City of Hillsboro
mi Andy Duyck,Washington County
Marilyn McWilliams,Tualatin Valley Water District
Craig Prosser, TriMet Board of Directors
Keith Mays,Washington Co. citizen
Wilda Parks, Clackamas Co. citizen
Maxine Fitzpatrick,Multnomah Co. citizen
Jim Rue, Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation& Development
Steve Stuart, Clark County
Anne McEnerny-Ogle, City of Vancouver
Sam Chase, Metro Council
Kathryn Harrington, Metro Council
Bob Stacey, Metro Council
1 Ruth Adkins, Portland Public Schools -
w Doug Neeley, City of Oregon City
0_ Denny Doyle, City of Beaverton
Tom (meson, Port of Portland
w-° Charlynn Newton, City of North Plains
r.' In Memoriam, William Wild, Oak Lodge Water District
II- Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation(JPACT)
0- Craig Dirksen, Metro Council, JPACT Chair
Shirley Craddick, Metro Council.JPACT Vice-Chair
Carlotta Collette, Metro Council
jp Paul Savas, Clackamas County
Diane McKeel, Multnomah County
l Roy Rogers, Washington County
Steve Novick, City of Portland
Donna Jordan, City of Lake Oswego
Shane Bemis, City_of Gresham
Denny Doyle, City of Beaverton
Neil McFarlane, TriMet
•
Jason Tell, ODOT
I Nina DeConcini, DEQ
) Don Wagner,Washington State DOT
l Bill Wyatt, Port of Portland •
j_ Jack Burkman, City of Vancouver
' Steve Stuart, Clark County
•
report contains information that.is intended for research purposes only and does not '
necessarily reflect current or future policy decisions of the Metro Council, MPAC or JPACT, .
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the Oregon Department of -
IThis
Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
and Federal Transit Administration. The opinions,findings and conclusions expressed
in this report are not necessarily those of the Oregon Department of Transportation,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration or Federal Transit - - .
litAdministration.
,t7": . 3 q.i .•1 � 4 '! lC '�F�' e•
Clean air and clean water do not n: A ••
stop at city limits or county lines. Y .-i �+� '.``+ ' � � '*• " �r - • r' r '_•Neither does the need for jobs,
a thriving economy and good
transportation choices for people
•
and businesses in our region. • '•
Voters have asked Metro to help
•
with the challenges that cross
those lines and affect the 25 cities
and three counties in the Portland
metropolitan area.
A regional approach simply
makes sense when it comes to
protecting open space, caring for
parks, planning for the best use of
land, managing garbage disposal
and increasing recycling.Metro • •
oversees world-class facilities
such as the Oregon Zoo,which
•
contributes to conservation
•
and education,and the Oregon •
Convention Center,which benefits
the region's economy.
Metro Council President
Tom Hughes
Metro Council
Shirley Craddick,District 1
Carlotta Collette,District 2,
Craig Dirksen,District 3
Kathryn Harrington, District 4
Sam Chase, District 5 •
Bob Stacey, District 6 •
Auditor
Suzanne Flynn
Metro
600 NE Grand Ave.
Portland,OR 97232-2736 •
503-797-1700
503-797-1804 TDD pip
503-797-1795 fax
For more information,visit
www.oregonmetro.gov/
ciimatescenarios
•
14069 Printed on recycled-content paper April 16.2014
•
4
1
•
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
FOR /3/ a°1 4/30/14
(DATE OF MEETING)
S'1u 644 Sess'Gv //{rn A
www.o regon metro.gov/cl i matescenarios
CLIMATE
SMART
COMMUNITIES Climate Smart Communities Scenarios Project
SCENARIOS PROJECT
Straw poll results from
April 11 joint JPACT/MPAC
meeting
_ April 15,2014
,1
CLIMATE Where we've been & where we
SMART
COMMUNITIES are headed
SCENARIOS PROJECT
PHASES 1 & 2 PHASE 3
Understand Choices Shape Choices Shape Preferred Adopt Preferred
2011-2012 lan.-Oct.2013 Nov 2013-June 2014 Sept.-Dec.2014
am e
ooDo � P 00 9C� oro Oo00
J J J J J J
WE ARE HERE
Straw poll results fi orr April 11
joint JPACT/MPAC mcefing
1
4/30/14
What the future might look like in 2035
RECENT TRENDS
This scenario shows the results of implementing adopted land use
and transportation plans to the extent possible with existing
revenue.
ADOPTED PLANS
This scenario shows the results of successfully implementing
adopted land use and transportation plans and achieving the current
RTP,which relies on increased revenue.
NEW PLANS& POLICIES
SI
This scenario shows the results of pursuing new policies,more
investment and new revenue sources to more fully achieve adop
"-" and emerging plans. ,T
Scenarios approved for testing by Metro advisory committees and the Metro Council in May and June 2013
Straw poll results from April 11 3
joint JPACT/MPAC meeting
Choices to make on May 30...
To realize our shared vision for healthy and equitable communities
and a strong economy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions...
J How much transit should we
provide by 2035?
J How much should we use
technology to manage the system
by 2035? r'• - ,
How much should we expand the \,_
reach of travel information by
2035?
Straw poll results from April 11
joint JP?CT/MPAC meeting
2
4/30/14
...Choices to make on May 30
] How much of the planned active
transportation network should we
complete by 2035?
U How much of the planned street
and highway network should we
complete by 2035?
U How should local communities -..,+.
manage parking by 2035?
Straw poll results from April 11
Joint JPACI/M PAC meeting
Preferences for Scenarios A, B, C
And In-Between Scenarios
Averages of all respondents (mean):
c -
■
4.9 16.0 — 3.9 --- 4.3 3.9 4.8 -
Transit Technology Travel Planned Active Planned Parking
Information Transportation Street and Management
Straw po!I results from April 17 Programs Network Highway
joint JPACT/MPAC meeting Network
3
4/30/14
Preferences for Scenarios A, B, C
And In-Between Scenarios
Averages for MPAC and JPACT separately:
CT --•—_
,
S --
B
•MPAC
7
•JPACT
2t
A 1] -
Transit Technology Travel Planned Active Planned Parking
Information Transportation Street and Management
Straw pot results from April 11 Programs Network Highway
joint JPACT/MPAC meeting Network
Preferences for Scenarios A, B, C
And In-Between Scenarios
Ranges of Responses for Each Component
Number of participants who voted for each scenario:
Travel Planned Planned
Transit Technology Information Active Street and Parking
Programs Transportation Highway Management
Network Network
C 4 21 5 2 3 9
Less than C 7 3 2 3 0 4
More than B 12 8 5 10 6 5
B 10 2 9 14 14 12
Less than B 1 1 7 3 9 2
More than A 2 0 3 4 3 1
A 0 1 5 0 1 3
Total 36 36 36 36 36 36
Panic . .
Straw pot results from April 11 F
Joint JFACT/MPAC meeting
4
4/30/14
TRANSIT
Number of participants who voted for each scenario:
Transit
14
12
10 -
g
4
th
A More Less than B More Less than C
than A B than B C
Straw poll results from April 11
joint 1PACT/MPAC meeting
TECHNOLOGY
Number of participants who voted for each scenario:
Technology
25 -- -
20
15 —_
10 -
0
A More Less than B More Less than C
than A B than B C
Straw poll results from April 11
JointJPACT/MPAC meeting
5
4/30/14
TRAVEL INFORMATION & INCENTIVE
PROGRAMS
Number of participants who voted for each scenario:
Travel Information&Incentive Programs
10
9 -i ---
6
5 "iii—
0
A More Less than B More Less than C
than A B than B C
Straw pull results from April 11
joint 1PACT/MPAC meeting
PLANNED ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Number of participants who voted for each scenario:
Planned Active Transportation Network
I -1 — -- — —
A More Less than B More Less than C
than A B than B C
Straw poll results from April 11
joint JPA(T/MPAC meeting
6
4/30/14
PLANNED STREET AND HIGHWAY NETWORK
Number of participants who voted for each scenario:
Planned Street and Highway Network
16
14
12 •
10
8
6
4 •
0
A More than Less than B More than Less than C
A B B C
r 12
PARKING MANAGEMENT
Number of participants who voted for each scenario:
Parking Management
14
12 1 ---
•
A More Less than B More Less than C
than A B than B C
Straw poll results from April 11 14
joint IPA meeting
7
•
4/30/14
Immediate next steps
WEEK OF APRIL 14 Report results of meeting
MAY 1-5 Members report to county
coordinating committees
MAY TPAC and MTAC shape draft option
for consideration on May 30
MAY 30 JPACT and MPAC rec'd on draft
preferred approach and begin
funding discussion
JUNE 19 Council direction on draft
preferred approach
Straw poll results from April 11
joint JPACT/MPAC meeting
Final steps in 2014
JUNE—AUGUST Staff evaluates draft preferred &
develops implementation rec'ds
with TPAC and MTAC
SEPTEMBER Report back results and begin
45-day public comment period
SEPT.— DEC. Public review of draft preferred
approach &final adoption
Straw poll results from April 11
joint JPACT/MPAC meeting
8
AIS-1733 B.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes
Agenda Title: Discussion of Upcoming Contracts
Prepared For: Joseph Barrett
Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Financial and Information Services
Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Local
Contract
Review
Board
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Discussion of upcoming Police Mobile Data Computer lease award.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff is asking the Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) to provide direction and additional information they
would like to have presented during the contract award for the Police Mobile Data Computer lease slated for
an upcoming agenda.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Due to change at the City of Portland with their data management system and the age of our current Mobile
Data Computers (MDCs) the city must upgrade our current inventory.The City of Portland will no longer
support the current data management system (PPDS) with which our current MDCs interface. In order to
interface with the new data management system (ReJIN) the city must upgrade its in car MDCs and software.
More details on this change was detailed in October 2013 and March 2014 memos to Council.
Staff estimates a need of 52 MDCs/tablets,including 4 smaller units for the motorcycle officers. The cost
includes docking stations,monitors, keyboard, and a variety of associated equipment. These new
MDCs/tables will provide officers with a much more mobile office and will minimize their need to report to
the station for report writing and other administrative functions. The total cost of this upgrade is estimated at
$232,566 via an existing municipal contract with CDW-G. Due to this high cost,staff is asking Council to
consider a 3-year municipal lease for the acquisition of the equipment. Staff estimates the annual payment,
with financing costs, to be in the neighborhood of$80,000. Staff is still in the process of negotiation of the
lease terms and will provide Council with the information as soon as it is available. Staff will not bring the
award consideration before the Local Contract Review Board without providing enough time for the Board to
consider the terms. However, staff is under a time crunch with this purchase as the city can not afford to delay
an order or it runs the risk of falling in the manufacturing pecking order and missing out on training provided
by the City of Portland. Staff anticipate the award consideration coming before the council on May 27th
which should keep the timing of order on track.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Council could direct staff to work on the feasibility of purchasing the equipment outright saving financing
charges. Staff would likely bring this as a budget adjustment between the approved and adopted budgets.
Council may reject this purchase which would leave the city unable to access the regional data management
system.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
This is the first time the Local Contract Review Board has discussed this lease. Informational memos were
send in October of 2013 and March 2014.
Attachments
October 2013 Memo
March 2014 Memo
MDC Quote
•
City of Tigard
TIGARID Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and Ci r Councilors
From: Alan Orr, Chief of Police
Re: Overview of the Police Records Management System Upgrade
Date: October 16, 2013
The law enforcement records management system that the Tigard Police Department currently
utilizes, the Portland Police Data System (PPDS), is now operating with obsolete technology. The
City of Portland, the agency who hosts the system, is in the process of implementing an upgrade
known as the Regional Justice Information Network (RegJIN).
Overview
The current system is critical to law enforcement operations. PPDS aggregates information based
on data collected from officer reports (including crime and accident reports) and makes it
available via real-time inquires to officers and command staff as well as records staff.
Unfortunately the legacy PPDS system, which went live in the early 1980s, is no longer supported
by the vendor. The upgrade to RegJIN provides continuity of operations and includes the
following benefits:
• Modernizes law enforcement data collection and record keeping
• Creates a fully integrated system reducing redundant data entry and data loss
• Increases data sharing and collaboration between a larger number of agencies
• Enhances access to crime information and emerging local trends
The City of Tigard Police Department cannot operate without a real-time data management
system and is not financially prepared to implement a stand-alone system. The City will be
renewing its agreement with the City of Portland to host the upgraded system by the end of
December 2013. At the present time, nearly 40 regional agencies representing five counties and
two states have indicated that they will participate (please see attachment for the full list).
By the end of summer of 2014 the City of Portland, along with the participating agency user
board, will evaluate the initial implementation and confirm a date go-live date for the remaining
participating agencies. It is anticipated that this will be November or December 2014. Tigard is
slated to be included in the second implementation phase.
Costs
The total cost per agency will be finalized once the number of participants has been confirmed
sometime in the spring of 2014. The current estimated cost range is $45 to $75 per sworn officer
per month. Based on Tigard's current sworn count of 68 officers, this translates into an annual
cost range of$36,720 to $61,200. If the current number of participating agencies becomes final,
the cost will likely be closer to $55 per sworn officer per year, or$44,880 for Tigard. As of the IIY
2013-14 Adopted Budget,Tigard's annual cost associated with the current system, PPDS, is
$62,042.
We will continue to provide updates as we get closer to go-live.
Attachment
• List of current partner agencies
RegJ I N Partner Agencies (RPA)
Organized by County
Monday, March 25, 2013
CLARK COUNTY on
. Battle Ground PO
COLUMBIA COUNTS'(7)
Clatskanie PD v Camas PD
4. Clark County SO(CCSO)
Columbia City PD A
Columbia County SO lOr
e La Center PD
Rainier PD ® ! Ridgefield PD
Scappoose PD
® Vancouver PD(VPD)
0 Washington State University(WSU)
St Helens PD 0
Washougal PD
Vemonia PD e
111 L.I NOMAD COL'\r1 (8)
• II Fairview PD
WASHINGTON COUN'il (12)
• Gresham PD(GPO)
Banks PD Mull County SO(MCSO)
Beaverton PD
• 3 9
. OHSU DPS
Cornelius PD 9 •
o Port of Portland PD(PDX)
Forest Grove PD
® Portland Police Bureau(PPB)
Gaston PD ..
• ® Portland State University(PSU)
Hillsboro PD 9
9 Troutdale PO
King City PO 9
North Plains PD *}
Sherwood PD [ I.'['k��1ASCO(TJTY(4)
Tigard PD 0 Canby PD
Tualatin PD 9 Gladstone PO
Washington County SO(WCSO) 0 O Lake Oswego PD(LOPD)
0 Milwaukie PD
' City of Tigard
T l G A R D Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilors
From: Alan Orr, Chief of Po licc-ft710
Re: Update: Police Records Management System Upgrade / Technology Purchase
Date: March 27, 2014
The purpose of this memo is to provide Council with an update on the progress of the police records
management system upgrade and to inform you of an upcoming technology purchase which will support
the upgrade.
Overview
As was stated in our October 2013 memo to Council, the law enforcement records management system
that the Tigard Police Department currently utilizes,the Portland Police Data System (PPDS),is now
operating with obsolete technology. The City of Portland, the agency who hosts the system,is in the
process of implementing an upgrade known as the Regional Justice Information Network (RegJIN). The
preparation for system go-live is in full swing with implementation still slated for December 8,2014.
Early Report Writing Update
One change that has been identified since our last update to Council is that the City of Tigard will no
longer be participating in the early roll-out of mobile report writing (MRE)as had been initially planned
for Spring 2014. The City of Portland RegJIN project management released a technical checklist in
January 2014 which was after the deadline for member jurisdictions to indicate interest in early MRE
participation.This checklist helped Tigard PD determine that our current mobile data computing
technology would not meet the new MRE standards and that we would be unable to purchase and install
new equipment in time to meet the MRE standards for early adoption.
Mobile Data Computing Technology
Since this time, the Police Department has been working closely with Tigard IT staff to identify the
technological specifications that meet current and foreseeable future data computing needs in order to
determine the best mobile data computer(MDC) solution. We have tentatively identified a powerful MDC
tablet manufactured by Getac and will be testing a live model within the next few weeks to confirm that all
existing software,in addition to the new RegJIN software, can be supported as expected.
The department had already been planning to replace the MDCs for two primary reasons:
1. Useful life. The current Panasonic MDCs, which were purchased in 2009,have already lived beyond
their ability to support any additional technologies and continue to be used past their useful life.
2. Mobik Offices. As per the FY 2014-15 Budget submission, the PD is embarking upon a plan to
more fully implement mobile workspaces for sworn officers. The MDCs will replace traditional
desktop computers in the patrol officers' report writing room as well as for sergeants and
command staff. By shifting to a more agile work space with greater technology function in each
Update:Police Records Management System Upgrade/Technology Purchase • Page 1 of 2
patrol car, we will allow officers to stay engaged within their districts a greater percentage of each
shift, supporting increased community policing effort and reducing the travel time back and forth
to the station for administrative purposes.
Unanticipated RegJIN-driven timelines have pushed the MDC replacement schedule back by several
months.
Training and ordering timelines
During the March RegJIN Project Advisory Committee meeting, more firm timelines were outlined for
the various training classes that will be required for each jurisdiction prior to the December 2014
implementation:
• Mid to late July 2014:Super trainer training
• August to September. Train-the-trainer training for each member agency
• September to November 2014: End user training for each member agency
After each group is trained they must have full access to the RegJIN system,which will not work on the
current MDCs.The current MDC operating system,Windows XP, is no longer supported by Microsoft
and presents a CJIS (data security) compliance issue. Manufacturing and shipping of MDCs can take 8 to
10+ weeks from order to delivery. Ordering the MDCs in July,as had been originally planned, would
result in an anticipated delivery timeframe of September/October or later depending upon the vendor's
backlog. Once the MDCs have been delivered they must be configured and installed in the patrol cars
which could take another 4 to 6 weeks and would put the Department out of compliance with training
requirements. The PD goal is to order the new MDCs by mid-May.
Costs and Financing
Membership Costs. The RegJIN membership cost range remains$45 to$75 per sworn officer per month.
Based on Tigard's current sworn count of 68 officers, this translates into an annual cost range of$36,720
to$61,200. The current estimate is closer to$59 per sworn officer per year, or$48,144 for Tigard.
Technology Costs. The replacement MDCs and related equipment is estimated to cost approximately
$205,000. In order to support these costs, the Department prioritized technology funding within its base
FY 2014-15 Budget by allocating approximately$70,000 towards this purchase. After several discussions
with IT regarding the most effective technology solutions,we determined that replacing all outdated
MDCs at one time, rather than purchasing the equipment in phases,was the most feasible and cost
effective approach.
Municipal lease. In order to afford the entire replacement at once, the PD is planning on entering a three or
four year municipal lease with the vendor. This will include a four year`bumper to bumper' warranty and a
purchase `clause'at the end so that the City will own the assets outright at the end of the lease period.
Next Steps
The Police Department anticipates discussing this issue with Council during an April study session and
requesting authority to sign the equipment lease contract during a May business meeting. We will continue
to provide updates as we get closer to go-live.
Attachment: October 2013 Police Records Management System Upgrade memo to Council
Update:Police Records Management System Upgrade/Technology Purchase - Page 2 42
ATTACHMENT
•I
City of Tigard
TIGARD Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilors
From: Alan Orr, Chief of Police CV.m.-C- Orig.
Re: Overview of the Police Records Management System Upgrade
Date: October 16, 2013
The law enforcement records management system that the Tigard Police Department currently
utilizes, the Portland Police Data System (PPDS),is now operating with obsolete technology. The
City of Portland, the agency who hosts the system,is in the process of implementing an upgrade
known as the Regional Justice Information Network (Reg)IN).
Overview
The current system is critical to law enforcement operations. PPDS aggregates information based
on data collected from officer reports (including crime and accident reports) and makes it
available via real-time inquires to officers and command staff as well as records staff.
Unfortunately the legacy PPDS system, which went live in the early 1980s, is no longer supported
by the vendor. The upgrade to RegJIN provides continuity of operations and includes the
following benefits:
• Modernizes law enforcement data collection and record keeping
• Creates a fully integrated system reducing redundant data entry and data loss
• Increases data sharing and collaboration between a larger number of agencies
• Enhances access to crime information and emerging local trends
The City of Tigard Police Department cannot operate without a real-time data management
system and is not financially prepared to implement a stand-alone system. The City will be
renewing its agreement with the City of Portland to host the upgraded system by the end of
December 2013. At the present time, nearly 40 regional agencies representing five counties and
two states have indicated that they will participate (please sec attachment for the full list).
In the spring of 2014 the City of Tigard will implement the officer report writing aspect of the
new system. It is anticipated that all jurisdictions will go-live with full implementation by
November or December 2014.
Costs
The total cost per agency will be finalized once the number of participants has been confirmed
sometime in the spring of 2014. The current estimated cost range is $45 to $75 per sworn officer
ATTACHMENT
per month. Based on '1'igard's current sworn count of 68 officers, this translates into an annual
cost range of$36,720 to $61,200. If the current number of participating agencies becomes final,
the cost will likely be closer to $55 per sworn officer per year, or$44,880 for Tigard. As of the FY
2013-14 Adopted Budget, '1'igard's annual cost associated with the current system, PPDS, is
$62,042.
We will continue to provide updates as we get closer to go-live.
AUachrrtenl
• List of current partner agencies
ATTACHMENT
RegJIN Partner Agencies (RPA)
Organized by County
Monday, March 25, 2013
( 1.4RK COUNTY(8)
COLT MB1%COUNTY(7)
46 Battle Ground PO
• Camas PD
Clatskanie PO +`t►
▪ Clark County SO(CCSO)
Columbia City PO 0
• La Center PO
Columbia County SO
Alp Rainier PD Ridgefield PD
A Vancouver PO(VPD)
Scappoose PD •
Q Washington State University(WSU)
St.Helens PD
Vernoroa PD v
® Washougal PD
MULTNOMAH COUNTY(8)
• Fairview PD
WABNLNGTOK COUNTY(12) a Gresham PD(GPO)
•Banks PO ' Mull. County SO(MCSO)
Beaverton PD • OHSU DPS
Cornelius Pp o Port of Portland PD(PDX)
Forest Grove PD
go Portland Police Bureau(PPB)
Gaston PD • Portland Stale University(PSU)
•
Hillsboro PD • •
Troutdale PD
King City PD
North Plains PD
• _ _
Sherwood PD CLACKAMAS COI"NTY(4)
'rgard PD • Canby PD
Tualatin PD kip . Gladstone PD
Washington County SO(WCSO) O at Lake Oswego PD ILOPD}
Milwaukee PD
CDWG.com 800.594.4239 OE400SPS
44;:4 SALES QUOTATION
QUOTE NO. ACCOUNT NO. DATE
FFTM751 8799245 4/15/2014
SHIP TO:
BILL TO: CITY OF TIGARD
LOUIS SEARS Attention To: LOUIS SEARS
8720 SW BURNHAM ST 8720 SW BURNHAM ST
Accounts Payable TIGARD ,OR 97223-6101
TIGARD , OR 97223-6101 Contact: MIKE NOLOP 503.718.2757
Customer P.O. #GETAC LEASE REV 1
Customer Phone#503.718.2403 QUOTE
ACCOUNT MANAGER SHIPPING METHOD TERMS EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE
BRAD TABATA 866.339.5194 AIT-Deferred,3-5 Days MasterCard/Visa Govt GOVT-EXEMPT
QTY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE
48 3163495 GETAC F110 TAB 15-43000 128GB 4GB 2.195.00 105,360.00
Mfg#:FWA118
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
48 3161239 GETAC F110 TABLET UPG RAM TO 8GB 198.00 9,504.00
MIg#:F-8GB
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
48 3163585 GETAC F110 TABLET CONTACTLESS SMART 120.00 5,760.00
Mfg#: F-RFID
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
48 3177675 GETAC MOUNT BRACKET W/SMART CARD RDR 71.00 3,408.00
Mfg#: GBK002
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
36 3161242 GETAC OFFICE DOCK W/PORT REPL F/F110 317.00 11,412.00
Mfg#:GODF01
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
33 3161247 GETAC VECH ADAPTER F/F110 V110 S400 136.00 4,488.00
Mfg#:GDC002
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
33 3166644 GETAC F110 TRI-PASS VECH DOCK 707.00 23,331.00
Mfg#: GVDF03
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
48 3251264 GETAC 4YR BUMPER TO BUMPER WTY 268.00 12,864.00
Mfg#: GS310A18
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
4 NEW-ITEM NEW ITEM 4,225.00 16,900.00
Mlg#:NEW-ITEM
Contract: MARKET
Getac T800 8"Tablet:
NEW Intel QuadCore Bay Trail-M
Processor N3530 2.16GHz,4GB RAM,
128GB SSD, LumiBond Touchscreen
Display, Webcam , 5MP Rear Camera,
802.11 Wireless, Bluetooth,
GOBI5000, GPS,-21C, IP65,WIN8.1
64-bit Pro 3 year B2B Warranty
Expansion Slot Option: 1 D/2D
Barcode
RF Tri Pass Through
Upgrade Dual mode(Digitizer+
Multi-touch)
Office Dock
1V11944. V-UNIIVI-I 1'I
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
6 2945591 HAVIS SWING OUT DASH MON MOUNT 165.00 990.00
Mlg#:C-DMM-119
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
7 1896009 HAVIS DEVNT,MNTR,DSH,SO,CV,95.10 165.00 1,155.00
Mfg#:C-DMM-101
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
12 2098360 HAVIS DEVMT,MNTR,DSH,SO,EXPL,06-10 155.00 1.860.00
Mlg#: C-DMM-111
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
28 2127233 HAVIS BRACE F/CROWN VIC 23.00 644.00
Mfg#:C-MM-201
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
28 1910230 HAVIS BRKT,ADPTR, DEVMT, KIT,SP 20.00 560.00
Mfg#:C-MM-301
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
28 1910234 HAVIS BASE,TELE,ARTIC, UNVMT 89.00 2,492.00
Mfg#: C-TCB-7
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
28 2592849 HAVIS TILT SWIVEL MOTION DEVICE 51.00 1,428.00
Mlg#:C-MD-204
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
28 2619910 HAVIS QUICK RELEASE SLIDE F/KB MOUNT 65.00 1,820.00
Mfg#:C-KBM-102
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
31 NEW-ITEM NEW ITEM 370.00 11,470.00
Mfg#: NEW-ITEM
Contract: MARKET
iKey Keyboard-IK-TR-88-911-TP
10 NEW-ITEM NEW ITEM 425.00 4.250.00
Mfg#:NEW-ITEM
Contract:MARKET
Getac executive attached keyboard
for the F110
48 3236648 SAMSUNG 24"S24B150BL LED 195.00 9,360.00
Mfg#:S24B150BL
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
20 2677865 KEN PRO FIT WRLS MEDIA KB/MOUSE SET 42.00 840.00
Mfg#: K72408US
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
20 2847937 KEN KB F/LIFE WIRED DESKTOP BROWN BX 19.00 380.00
Mfg#: K72436U5
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
52 534223 CDW IMAGE DEPLOYMENT&INTEGRATION 25.00 1,300.00
Mfg#: INSTALIMAGE2
Contract: National IPA Technology Solutions
130733
SUBTOTAL 232,566.00
FREIGHT 0.00
TAX 0.00
US Currency
TOTAL I>M 232,566.00
Please remit payment to:
CDW Government
r-rvM f_n,crn moral 75 Camiltance flri..o
rhis 04;TtA4AtoActpW's Terms and Conditions of Sales and Service Projects at Suite 1515
-ittp:/ c4letw:content/terms-coniii.4094pfpsiygisales.asp Chicago, IL 60675-1515
-or more Information. contact a CDW account manaaer.
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
FOR i21 a ti ' oaf
1111 (DATE OF MEETING)
•
Stu dy .Session
MEMORANDUM T n1 3
TIGARD
TO: Mayor Cook and City Council
FROM: Joe Barrett,Sr. Management Analyst
RE: Additional Information for May 13th Study Session Item for Police Mobile
Data Computers
DATE: May 12,2014
Staff has recently wrapped up negotiations for the lease of new mobile data computers
(MDCs) that will allow the city to interface with the new ReJIN data management system.
Council has a first presentation of this lease this Tuesday, at the May 13th Study Session with
the lease award presentation scheduled for the May 27th business meeting. The following is
information that was unavailable at the time the Agenda Summary for the May 13th meeting
was submitted.
The city is looking to lease 50 rugged MDCs for police vehicles. Four smaller units for the
motorcycle officers will be ordered at a later date due in large part to the manufacturing cycle
they require. The cost of each MDC includes a docking station, monitor, keyboard, and a
variety of other equipment. The city will lease the equipment from VAR Resources with the
equipment coming via CDW-G through an existing contract the city is eligible to make
cooperative purchases under.
The total quote for the equipment is $215,140. The lease financing rate is 5.94% for 36
months. The total annual payment is $75,973 for a lease lifetime cost of$227,919. Total
financing charges under the lease are $12,779. The lease also contains a one dollar buyout
after the 36 months which the city is expecting will occur and will leave the city owning all
the equipment. The first payment will be due at the end of May in order to meet the
manufacturing schedule and the ReJIN implementation schedule. The second and third
payments will occur in FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 respectively.
Please let staff know of any other information you would like see with regards to this
project. Thank you.
AIS-1749 C.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: Briefing on an Agreement Regarding the Construction of Water Partnership Projects in
the City of Gladstone
Prepared For: Dennis Koellermeier,Public Works
Submitted By: Greer Gaston, Public Works
Item Type: Public Hearing- Informational Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg-
Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Study Sess.
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Staff will brief council on a cooperative agreement regarding the construction of water partnership projects in
the City-of Gladstone.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
No action is requested; the agreement will be scheduled for formal council consideration on an upcoming
consent agenda.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
This cooperative agreement was developed to define the roles and responsibilities of the Lake Oswego-Tigard
Water Partnership ("partnership") and the City of Gladstone as the partnership constructs water
improvements through that city. Due to the location and nature of partnership projects—like the construction
of a large diameter pipeline within several of Gladstone's roadways—the partnership will need to restore those
roadways. Restoration will involve substantial resurfacing,curb replacements and other similar work. In
addition, the City of Gladstone asked the partnership to include some water main replacements for its system,
at Gladstone's expense, prior to the roadwork.
Lastly, issues such as indemnification,inspection,notice and permitting exist between the parties. This
cooperative agreement addresses those issues. Even though the existing contractual relationship between Lake
Oswego and Tigard clearly assigns construction responsibility to Lake Oswego, this agreement was designed
to capture the spirit of the cooperation between all three cities. Both the City of Gladstone and the City of
Lake Oswego have already approved this agreement.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The council could propose changes to the agreement or could decide not to approve the agreement. Should
the council not approve the agreement, that decision would jeopardize partnership plans to construct projects
in the City of Gladstone and would delay the completion of Tigard's new water system slated for completion
in 2016.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Tigard City Council - Proposed Goals and Milestones,September 2013 - December 2014
Lake Oswego-Tigard plater Partnership (I_OT IVP)
•Monitor pratress of construction and budget;LOTIIVP praject c operational
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
This is the first time the council will see this agreement.
•
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Information:
Tigard's share of the costs arising from this agreement are included in the city's $70-million water
partnership budget for fiscal year 2014-2015.
Attachments
Cooperative Agreement
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
FOR
JOINT FUNDING OF ROADWAY AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
This Inter governmental Cooperative Agreement, hereinafter "Agreement," is entered into by
and between the following parties: The City of Lake Oswego, a municipal corporation of the
State of Oregon, and the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon,
hereinafter collectively called "Partnership," and the City of Gladstone, a municipal corporation
of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called "City."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Partnership is planning construction of new underground water transmission
pipelines within portions of Portland Avenue, Clackamas Blvd., Bellevue Avenue, Exeter Street,
Jensen Road and Meldrum Bar Park Road, and these roads are public roads under the roadway
authority of City; and
WHEREAS, construction of the Partnership's water transmission pipelines will damage the City's
public roads and the City finds and declares that these impacts must be mitigated through a
combination of restoration and enhancement of its public roads in furtherance of a functional
and safe, roadway system; and
WHEREAS, City owns, operates and maintains water distribution mains that are located within
the construction area of the Partnership's planned water transmission line improvements
described above; and
WHEREAS, City's water distribution mains provide water supply for public health, sanitation,
fire protection, recreation, and economic development, and the City finds and declares that
coordinating improvements to its water distribution system with the Partnerships water system
improvements will reduce costs to its citizens relative to making these improvements alone at
another time; and
WHEREAS, the Partnership and City recognize that by entering into this Agreement their
respective citizens will benefit from cooperative and coordinated planning, funding, and
construction of roadway and water system improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Parties enter into this Agreement pursuant to ORS 190.003 to 190.110, which
authorize units of local government to enter into such agreements.
{00335082;3}I ake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 1
"'X..:n:4__ ..,•a•s�-.:. Y..r..: - k- 3 S} 1
.�..�.�... .....t.r?}e?T•.^� 1r4.. ........._s:0.•«{':2i _...:....�_.;..___:.ar:� ....-',:ii.�_........ :7... { 4". !;y7:... a -
NOW,THEREFORE,the Parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS
Replacement of the Partnership's existing water transmission main and related improvements
and extensions to City's distribution mains are more particularly described in Article 1A.
Roadway improvements are more particularly described in Article 1B.
A. Water Pipelines
The Partnership owns, operates, and maintains an existing 27-inch diameter steel water
transmission main ("existing main") located within the public rights of way of City. The existing
main will be abandoned in place and filled with grout (see attached Exhibit A). A new 42-inch
diameter steel water transmission main ("new main") will be constructed within the rights of
way of City (see attached Exhibit B). Construction of the new main will create opportunities for
the Partnership to make certain improvements to City's water distribution mains. The
improvements desired by the City are more particularly described as follows:
1. Construct approximately 224 feet of new six (6)-inch diameter ductile iron water main
including valves, fittings, and appurtenances along East Clackamas Blvd. to the
intersection of Portland Avenue. Abandon approximately 350 feet of existing 1-Inch
diameter water line in East Clackamas Blvd (see Exhibit C).
2. Construct approximately 206 feet of new six (6)-inch diameter ductile iron water main
including valves, fittings, and appurtenances along Portland Avenue from East
Clackamas Blvd. to the int r e&iin Arlington Street(see Exhibit 0).
3. Construct approximately 7C2 feet t�new six (6)-inch diameter ductile iron water main /
including valves, fittings, and appurtenances along Meldrum Bar Park Road ending- W r
a (see Exhibit E).
B. Roadway, Pathway and Parking Area Reconstruction and Restoration
Portland Avenue, Clackamas Blvd., Bellevue Avenue, Exeter Street, Jensen Avenue, and
Meldrum Bark Park Road will be impacted by construction of the Partnership's new main. City
is requiring the Partnership to restore and reconstruct these roads as follows:
1. Clackamas Blvd.—Between approximately 201 West Clackamas Blvd. and the intersection
of Clackamas Blvd. and Portland Avenue,the Partnership will restore the roadway in the
following manner:
a. Mill and overlay the street for its full width with three (3)-inches of new asphaltic
cement ("AC") pavement, and
b. Match existing slope and grade.
2. Bellevue Avenue—Between Clackamas Blvd. and Exeter Street, the Partnership will
reconstruct the street and make other improvements as follows:
{00335082;3 hake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 2
a. Construct a new pavement section for the full width of the existing street
consisting of Geotextile fabric, under nine (9) inches of aggregate base, under
four (4) inches of new asphaltic concrete pavement;
b. Install new curbs, and curb cuts for driveways on both sides of Bellevue Avenue
to match with and connect to existing curbs where they exist;
c. Modify the slopes and grades of the existing street to promote drainage to
existing storm drainage systems, and
d. Construct new storm drainage facilities where needed to collect and convey
storm water off the street, all in accordance with Clackamas County Standards
relating to design and construction of local streets.
3. Exeter Street—The Partnership will improve the roadway of this street as follows:
a. Between Bellevue Avenue and the intersection with Beatrice Avenue, the
Partnership will construct a half-street improvement consisting of resurfacing an
eighteen (18) foot-wide section of pavement from the centerline of the street
south to the existing curb line with four (4) inches of new asphaltic concrete
pavement over new aggregate leveling course as needed;
b. Between Beatrice Avenue and approximately 470 Exeter Street, the Partnership
will construct a half-street improvement consisting of resurfacing an eighteen
(18) foot-wide section of pavement from the centerline of the street north to the
existing curb line with four (4) inches of new asphaltic concrete pavement over
new aggregate leveling course as needed;
c. At changes in alignment of the pipeline that occurs at Beatrice Avenue and at the
dead end of Exeter Street, a full width resurfacing with four (4) inches of new
asphaltic concrete pavement over new aggregate leveling course as needed will
occur at these locations, and
d. The restored street sections will:
i. Match existing slope and grade; and
ii. Replace pavement markings as necessary.
4. Jensen Road—Between its northeasterly terminus with SE River Road and extending
approximately one thousand (1,000) feet southwest, the Partnership will reconstruct
Jensen Road with three (3)-inches of asphaltic concrete over eight (8)-inches of
aggregate base for its full nine (9)-foot width. The completed overlay will:
a. Match existing slope and grade; and
b. Match the existing average width of edge to edge of pavement.
5. Jensen Road to Meldrum Bar Park Road—Between these two roads, the Partnership will
replace existing pedestrian pathways and parking areas disturbed by construction of the
new main. Restoration will include parking stall re-striping as necessary. The contract
documents for construction will require the contractor to restore temporary
{00335082;3)Lake Oswego/1 igard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 3
construction easement areas impacted by construction to a condition equal to or better
than pre-construction conditions.
6. Meldrum Bar Park Road—Where construction of the Partnership's new main and
construction of the City's new water main (see Article 1A.3, above) occurs within the
paved portion of this road, the Partnership will mill and overlay the Meldrum Bar Park
Road with four (4)-inches of AC over nine (9)-inches of aggregate rock base. Where
construction of the City's new water main (see Article 1A.3, above) occurs within the
paved portion of this road, the Partnership will restore the trench section with four (4)
inches of new asphaltic concrete pavement over nine (9) inches of new aggregate base.
The completed overlay and trench restoration will:
a. Match existing slope and grade; and
b. Match the existing average width of edge to edge of pavement (overlay portion
only).
7. Roadway Restoration (Collateral Damage)--Where construction of the Partnership's
new main or construction of the City's new water main results in damage to roadways
beyond the limits described in Articles 1B.3 and 18.6., above, the Partnership will
restore the damaged areas in the same manner as required for those roadways and to
the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.
ARTICLE 2. OBLIGATIONS OF PARTNERSHIP
The Partnership agrees to the following:
1. To provide and pay for all engineering design services relating to the Projects described
in Articles 1A and 18, above and to cause its design engineer to design the Projects in
accordance with the generally accepted design standards for public water systems and
public roads and those currently in effect by the City.
2. To exercise the same standard of care in engineering design it provides on the Projects
constructed for City's benefit, as it provides to itself for water transmission lines and
improvements constructed for its benefit.
3. To cause construction, through its construction contractors, of the Projects described in
Articles 1A and 1B in accordance with the City's adopted Public Works Standards.
4. To furnish and pay for all preliminary design drawings and specifications to City at the
90%and 100% design development stage of the Projects in Articles 1A and 1B for review
and approval by City. City shall have 10 days to complete its review at each stage and
provide comment on the design drawings and specifications. The Partnership will
incorporate City's comments if consistent with relevant design standards generally
accepted in the location of the work, and City standards, into the final construction
contract documents for the Projects. The Partnership shall provide a copy of the final
design drawings and specifications to the City following acceptance by the City.
5. To furnish and pay for a copy of the "as bulks" plans at the time ownership of any of the
Projects transfers to the City under Article 6.
100335082;3)Lake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 4
6. To solicit competitive bids at its sole cost and expense in accordance with the public
contracting rules of the City of Lake Oswego. The City of Lake Oswego,on behalf of the
Partnership, shall award the contract to the Contractor submitting the lowest,
responsive, responsible bid in accordance with state public contracting laws. The bid
shall require the Contractor to segregate, in its bid,the component bid amounts for the
construction costs of the Projects listed in Article 1A.
7. To provide not less than 72-hours notice to City of the need to interrupt normal water
supply service of City's water system in order to construct the Projects. Partnership
agrees to minimize the frequency and duration of interruptions to normal water service
through advance planning and coordination with the City Public Works Director.
B. To provide access to the Projects by authorized operating or inspection personnel of the
City for purposes of observing the contractor's work prior to acceptance by City.
9. To provide at its sole cost and expense to City,copies of all reports of tests and
inspections required by the construction contract documents and related to
construction of the Projects.
10.To furnish and install at locations and in quantities deemed appropriate by City,
Informational signage at its sole cost and expense,identifying the Projects and that it is
a public works project constructed and funded in part by the Partnership in cooperation
with City.
11. To the extent any lawsuit, claim or other action filed by a third party relates to any
aspect of the Projects or related activities described in this Agreement,the Partnership
will timely notify the City and seek to resolve the claim in the most efficient and
economical manner possible, consistent with the rights of the parties. The Partnership
agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials,officers,employees and
agents harmless from all claims,demands, damages, expenses, loss,property damage or
injuries arising out of the Projects or related activities described in this Agreement,
except for any claims that arise out of the City's own intentional or negligent acts.
12. All construction contracts entered into pursuant to the Projects listed in Article 1 above,
or construction work performed by Partnership shall require the contractor and
Partnership to obtain,and to maintain in full force and effect for the term of the
contract,a Workers Compensation insurance policy meeting statutory coverage
requirements,together with comprehensive or general liability insurance policies in the
amount of at least$2 million per occurrence and $2 million in the aggregate, and shall
require certificates and additional insured endorsements designating the City of
Gladstone as an additional named insured.
13. Coordinate with the Contractor in the event a need arises under the terms of the
construction contract for a change order. The change order shall require the Contractor
to segregate the construction costs of the change order for each of the Projects.
Segregation of the change order amount(s)for each Project shall be the basis of
determining the allocable share of the costs Parties for the change order pursuant to
Article 5.
{00335082;3)Lake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 5
-:'••`•'••�:::. .........__._3:3.�.: is n 'lG.:':::.....':vC33:t7i.K N.=f.Sf:•7 ,
77%77:7,'}737}9:])3:5.'9, .. slsiiiY."{7•i: .. 'i. 4:3`"-- • i 1,2KiK 3'
14.To conduct at its sole cost and expense a preconstruction assessment (video
documentation) of Exeter Street and Meldrum Bar Park Road to ensure areas impacted
by construction of the Partnerships new main or City's new main are restored to equal
or better condition. A copy of this video will be provided to the Public Works Director.
ARTICLE 3. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY
The City agrees to the following:
1. To provide all necessary easements, sufficient for the Partnership to construct the
Projects.
2. To appropriate,through its statutory budget process,sufficient funds to pay for the
construction costs associated with the Projects in Article 1A that may be incurred in the
fiscal year in which the Projects are constructed.
3. To timely provide review and comment on the solicitation documents, including the
design drawings and construction specifications, and conduct a final review for
acceptance of such drawings and specifications prior to bid solicitation for the Projects.
4. To provide advance written notice, in whatever form City determines appropriate,to its
water customers whose normal water supply service will be interrupted during the
course of the work and until the Projects described in Article 1A are completed and
accepted by City.
5. To be the primary point of contact for and to respond to complaints or questions from
City's residents'water customers that may arise in relation to the Projects described in
Article 1A and 16.
6. To provide experienced operating personnel in sufficient number to operate any and all
portions of City's system to facilitate the timely and efficient construction,testing, and
commissioning of the Projects.
7. To observe,at a frequency the Public Works Director deems appropriate and that is
reasonable for the types of Projects,the quality of the Contractor's work as it relates to
the Projects and report to the Partnership's inspection personnel any apparent
defective work. Failure of the Public Works Director, or his designee to timely raise,
following observation, any objections to the work, as to the Projects,shall; solely as to
the Partnership, constitute a release by City to the Partnership for any claims,causes of
action, or damages arising out of or relating to the Partnership's inspection of that
Project, and the City shall hold the Partnership harmless from any claims arising
therefrom.
8. To provide personnel and equipment necessary to take samples of water from the
mains constructed as part of the Project for bacteriological testing purposes after
disinfection is complete,and prior to connection of the new pipelines to the City's public
water system.
9.
{00335082;3}Lake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 6
ARTICLE 4. MUTUAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES
The Parties to this Agreement covenant and mutually agree as follows:
1. That all design drawings, specifications, details and related work products and works in
progress of the Partnership produced or in production for the Projects are under the
exclusive control and ownership of the Partnership.
2. Prior to the onset of construction of any of the Projects listed in Article 1A or 1B, if the
Partnership does not receive all necessary permits and approvals for its new main, the
Partnership may terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement the
Partnership and the City hereby release each other from any further obligation to the
other Party under this Agreement.
3. To the extent a Contractor claim related to the Projects is deemed by the Partnership to
have merit, additional costs associated with the claim will be apportioned to the Parties
in a fair and equitable manner considering all relevant facts and conditions giving rise to
the claim.
4. In the event the City does not appropriate funds sufficient to remunerate the
Partnership for its allocable share of Project costs during any fiscal year in which any
Project element is planned for construction, the Partnership may terminate this
Agreement or remove the unfunded portion of the Project. If this Agreement is
terminated or a Project is removed, the Partnership and the City agree to hereby release
each other from any further obligation to the other Party under this Agreement
provided that the Partnership incurs no costs associated with deletion of any Project
work from the construction contract, in which case the provisions of Article 4.6 will
automatically apply.
5. The Parties shall work together in good faith during construction of the Projects to
minimize the potential for Contractor claims that may arise from differing site
conditions, action of the Parties, or any other reason.
6. In the event this Agreement is terminated, each party shall be responsible for those
additional costs attributable to the portion of the Projects for which that party is
financially responsible. In the event this Agreement is terminated due to default by the
City under the terms of this Agreement, and the Partnership incurs additional costs, or is
due remuneration of its expenses relating to the Projects incurred up to the termination
date,the City agrees to pay the Partnership for all such extra or unreimbursed expenses
if the City is provided with documentation of such costs and expenses.
7. It is understood by the Parties that in order to minimize the inconvenience to water
customers, certain portions of the Projects may be completed outside normal working
days and hours. When that is determined necessary by the Partnership and approved
by the City, each Party agrees to provide sufficient, experienced operations staff outside
normal working hours as necessary to meet the schedule established by the Partnership,
to ensure timely completion of the Projects.
(00335082;3)Lake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 7
ARTICLE 5. ALLOCATION OF PROJECT COSTS
Project costs for Projects described in Articles 1A and 1B, above will be allocated to the Parties
in the following manner:
A. Project No. 1A.1; 1A.2,and 1A.3-Water main replacements and extensions.
1) City obligation. The City will pay all costs relating to the construction of approximately
1,200 feet of 6-inch diameter ductile iron water main as set forth in Article 1.A.,
including valves, hydrants, services, appurtenances, connections and modifications to
the City's public water system. City will pay all costs relating to pavement restoration
for the Projects listed in Article 1A.2 and 1A.3, above., but excluding pavement
restoration costs for collateral damage noted in Article 1B.7, above. At the completion
of the work and acceptance by City,the City of Lake Oswego shall invoice City for
construction costs associated with the Projects. The City shall make payment to the City
of Lake Oswego within 30 days of the date of the invoice. In the event the City contests
certain charges,the City shall make payment for the uncontested amount. Payments
shall be made to City of Lake Oswego at PO Box 369, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034.
2) Partnership Obligation. The Partnership will pay all costs relating to design, bid phase
services, and construction inspection and testing through completion of the
construction contract.
B. Project No. 18.1 through 1B.6—Roadway reconstruction and restoration.
1) Partnership obligation. The Partnership will pay all costs relating to the Projects listed
in Article 1B and all costs relating to the pavement restoration costs associated with
Project 1A.1 above.
Contested Charges
1) With respect to any contested charges,the City and the Partnership shall meet within 45
days of the date of the invoice to discuss the charges. The City and Partnership agree to
make staff available to meet as necessary to negotiate the contested charges, including
but not limited to administration, engineering and legal staff. In the event the parties
are not able to resolve the disputed amounts, the parties retain all legal claims and
remedies. Any such claims shall be resolved using Alternative Dispute Resolution
methods that may include, but are not limited to, mediation, non-binding arbitration,
and/or binding arbitration. In such instance where the dispute cannot be resolved
through these methods, the Parties retain their rights to bring suit in Clackamas County
Circuit Court and are subject to Oregon law.
ARTICLE 6. OWNERSHIP OF CONSTRUCTED WORK
400335082;3}Lake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 8
Upon completion of Projects 1A.1 through 1A.3 and acceptance of the Projects by City,
ownership of the new distribution systems and all appurtenances will pass to the City and all
such piping, valving,fire hydrants,and appurtenances shall be operated and maintained
exclusively by and for the benefit of City.
Upon completion of the respective Projects 1B.1 through 1B.6, and acceptance of the Projects
by City,the road improvements shall become the property of the City, to maintain as the City
deems appropriate.
ARTICLE 7. CONTRACTOR'S WARRANTY
Upon acceptance of the Projects by the City,City shall take possession of the Projects. Upon
taking possession of a Project,Contractor's warranty of title and general warranty and
guarantee against defective work shall pass to the City as to that Project which is a part of the
construction contract. City shall have all of the Partnership's rights under the construction
contract related to enforcement of the contract requirements insofar as they are applicable to
that Project. Any Contract for the Construction of the Partnership's new main in the City of
Gladstone will require that the City be named as a co-obligee on the Contractor's performance
bond.
ARTICLE 8. BINDING OBLIGATION
The parties respectively warrant to the other that this Agreement has been duly approved and
executed by an authorized official of the party, and that by the execution hereof by the official
and the party's attorney,this Agreement is a binding and enforceable obligation upon the party
under applicable laws, including the party's charter and ordinances.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Cooperative Agreement as set forth
opposite their names below.
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO CITY OF TIGARD
Bv_ a Z.$ei469 By' - —Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM
{00335082:3)Lake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 9
David D. Powell,City Attorney Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel
CITY OF GLADSTONE
Date: 2 •
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Heather Martin, Legal Counsel
Exhibits:
A—Existing 27-Inch raw water line to be abandoned
B—Proposed new 42-Inch raw water line to be constructed within Gladstone
C—Proposed new 6-Inch main In Clackamas Blvd.
D— Proposed new 6-inch main in Portland Avenue.
E—Proposed new 6-Inch main in Meldrum Bar Park Road.
(003350821 3}Lake Oswego/Tigard/Gladstone
Cooperative Agreement for Joint Funding of Roadway and Water System Improvements
Page 10
:.c" " ''''..‘ ... -.4"-, aN"I''-_,4P X"- -- - '- • -k.
+ ., t,lyl ! tie•• \6� i c ' ' � J
_ � . •
• i �'.. # ` ,�-, t e IP'�f -�.e, '�� y? _+..-- 's-. ' -./ \ •,� ice, , • �t-
s;pito - , ''‘, tikti e - - N . c , \.., • ..' )A---■ -%
� r 'e ,... � Y t j�. � ,,;,. >` M �lY.,+, /.r L, #G`o%oe •.,. ``•, M' -�' Y� •,� . - b, •
•J, if._ ri t �� \� ` .I t., yeti �' trr: �r� >Ky � ' - .t 7.-- 3•�
•j,. t , • C t�l .'��t :•10
r^ / ��. �`7/T !_�'` ` •9 ��'►' ��j .�' .-'1 a •�\; -'i :.•r i y ✓ •� Pa(�.�• `•' /•• `,/, `►T �t�. ir, ok -.Y ".- a .` ." `,.{` .•
Me d Frz7 Q \d<y ��' t4 11 �'► �*i "" *r t t va�1 • ' '` e' '�C'i
1°.'7,....x..- ss ';!s a�1, 4,f, s, `` •►� '� r ti o-,g&-J�e?� •,
r `a ,e'. :fit ' t9• -
e 7f j�!%f �e'��•�;'f,►'� `� e.* • • -- ' .fit. ` . ♦ . '� _ s•iN! ' 'e fir„II,
`. \`� • t �,..vi1• q .'.} s ._,
- , '� • �' Intake
a. y .... _.„. -
\ " 6 . •• �• . :i ; `�• { Pump Station
S ,�i ✓'�� sue• . - _ --f - v. 9 _ ',le-
■
141"//am s e Ricer '� ' ••qty _ .' a .. i j s ♦ . •es-
�7 • • U,
Existing Raw Water Pipeline Alignment 'e•• - • ' -,f t ' -
Crty of Lake Oswego Property ' ' . 1 t.A• V A r
Streams N . -• ti 4 - J.
0 600 1.200 V • ti".ft�. �� .,:�i.•A .f'=lC. •� ` AP. 1 '
Feet _ r`. y t�e _.
# �` �� .
0 Lake Oswego•Tigard Brown Existing Raw Water Pipeline Alignment Figure 1
snowy.4ffle•connecting conerftrunes Water Partnership Caldwell i 9 P 9
r _____.. ,....- •
- -i A, , ,c,„.. ri.;..--r....ka.,..- , . A --•••••,,,,,wwwwww,
1 .‘', Ilif oilyilii. '•. •'-*• • ' . c. ..
, . , 0... 4 .,. 4.-
1 .
,:
' • -, — --
•1-, ..-4, ,7•14A,.- . .
=
it k ',. -■t \ a .,,
OP.
r x 0 - .'','.."-.'.• '.4.„,T'4.' .7. 4....,I.-_4 •-.A',.- r .--.3.
• :
5
. . i
gi',mi.t f . •4•- •
.iC■L it
, . . ...
ono „,,,, .,: ," • • ,...,... .
4 d• . •
''•'''' 11■' '1' War •.-•"? ' "' f 4, • •.;' - C ..., Y.. ., - .
111..4 41.1' ..' • 'II litikft . .... • •- '''''.. .-I.". 4 -•, 1-, 0 4..44i I= la• ' -.. ,....i...• • .,...•,.
,ma, , •,40, .,,„ .1, ' • , -.,,,.. ,_1
•
4
. - r v • .4,, , * . ,• • E
.. ••-4 . -• A• i• No
;..• ,r,
IIP... . I,.
I.:-.■ i , : .
‘1. 0.. '4k. kl.* ')1 'Ill 1 ' . ' Illik - '*-:., %,Tt4; -• - - • '. • -vill .
cu
p : ' '.: • , 7..0 ,...dir 4..- ••••• .•..,.6\ - • -
A..;1)4).• -,,•■°L 1''': • . •••.,,'e.
-14 -'-' c3,• .0 -. , ' li - - ..4 II, ,, ' .
o'• \r•-• 0\\,.'..' .10 14 1 '-'46, ' 7-• i - '. - ...I E
..
c
• ,P ' -er`,.h.•11+ ,. • • -. --i •' '- - ,,,,-.• ••„?.-.. - * A 4 .414 • • .-* - •,. •,, 01
•• ,•• .. ..,!....it, _..,.. •.. 00-, .,.. ... ' ,
, •
• ' -,.,..
e
•.,-I.-SI,P• • ,, .',‘4/. --4.,'..,-,'1..1.4..•i,-.'•l-.•--1-,•('•7:L"\i.*.g..$...•,vV 77.-• •-•i 2.-.,:I..--.:-j4 e.'-r 4..,d:,e 4'4-'--- i..4 1'.-,r..':•i,t-k"-.:-. -4.'-
- - - - t' ' '',.. •i.s".i- ,'L:-r...•i.•',,.i k-s&.,-_A.,.„..1-..,•''_''A‘..i..r v'L:•. .,...„'' -•1.2•:--,4' 4*
• - , , ; .\-
'
.•-'4
.•
:.,.. .
.._
-• ,-
., s ,.,•••• . , •
, ,,,,,_, - - - 4.,,,_„ , . ..ir •-..# , ,
. . •in •,i
....\ T., •ityc , - .,
• . 3P • P '. . A. 0 Of. .....ite" ..• :. 1"•
..- -7 0.: ,.... - ....-
ill\ • t.'``• , 4
lii'lli,.'r :, - •• . S ; .
.0 1 k ...4 ". + ■ -I.' A"
._, . .,. ..,
,. . . .
- • _ . III . °' -Mr
\
•••! .,. 4, • ". •
. ,
_taiire ..,.. ir , .,;• , lc_ ... , . e • ,,-,.
r st, _ .• ,_., •,.3, 1 -, 1..... - • ,„•. • .
$ . % lif '— .--
•.• ' • *• lb , •,- 11,7";' . • .7.'• II - . iv.., : ' `,19. •,.. . 7 ; 14.
• 4.. I
, .,
,k.• : L .
.. .... , . . 41 •.• 7.!•-- ..,•• :„ •, • r
• .
itspi iti
•Itir ' . • ,Iii, 4. 1 ., • , ,., 34. . ,,.30. - , ,.. ap, - 4,..; - .. , ....
,,,. .--.. . 4, '` • #. -
, . .
. s ... „- . :•, v, 4.. -- .. .---, 0 -, ,., - ••••%?',..t.•
' ). • r6P. r% -• . re L • . 4. • .... .10 ---:.. - •,••■
ir• .. •.. e. . , . -- ,-. ;„ -.. .?.): , .t. ... ....ii• ' . • .,•
„
it,
, . ,11. . ..!V or i •.'. t. . ,er. 1115 4;. ..161 c•‘., • N.
,.-..-, • ,
V `• ... -,,, "1.. A, ,..- , ,0 • . IP '.% 'Y ",-' ' te ''
, , .
,A . # 5 fl. .,
' .
11,11.- 11 1. , „, ....■ \ ...i,• •
7,14! ' .rilw. a
•• • • . . -. .
Ni.a.',...1•1•,.? if•' •-*•• -. .. . -
....,- . • '••••••••
_••• .
. • -
. ..1 ir,
or ,
1 ' ..1 . -''- a'• . aip . • •
1.• • A .‘ '_. :';•,:" •-. ' '• 1 - ' • V.., . - •
. LA , +1/4...,\„. meg ..,,,,,k4. -., . -„.if - i. - ... . • , •
, - .... Iv • ...-„,., •,., ..._ , ,. .";:zA - '
V
,,..s. ,, '...,- %ILL ....'" ;• ,,• • X, , .., .
-• .L. L.., •. >it a••• ir It ,
., ..,. . ,
•,_ . . . _ •* 11 ' \ •
• A - .4 j. +L. • , ..„,..:-.•;,
•, ,,
. A „
• _. . \ . .. ,.
tr•• '
"14 41.1°.-:).: ■'4‘ 11;10.7f*:44.\ • le ' ' I
loc. •• '''..::1;1',.:•''''',44,.. .•\ • ,I, -..0 L..:' •,,' `711F *,,41/'''.- 1:• ..,:* • .0.14ii•:11) \N. .4; • • ir'l . .. . •.:-. : ''.
k I, • .--"," ... , 4. •.is 1
..-..• ..1,...A,tr. ; ';...*.c....c0 . 6 s.':‘,...,.'f.,: ... ...‘ , ,, ..,...„-, - ,. . ,....,,,, IP ,.. .4L.• ' . ....)
.,c; ,-..e.1.!. 1w-- • 1,-„viio. „.41, - .4:ai ... c„„1/4.,.. . . •
' 4•.- t' 1:4ri
- •. . 0 -3,!---4..-- .••)\•• • .....:, 111,•.., ...7: ..... , 11. *,1,01. ... ' .do. !k•11141114\iV 0 /... .
4
..sii ', ., 10 r :.'.00.12!!..,,,, .-. •••':,,,' .,.',: .•"! s k . ..-1, ik,.... ,40. 77 . i
•• .1.• ,* i"1 ‘. •
..?„,‘ .;..-, ,, , .• -,..,,... , ' _',4 44,4 '.., ,...'a ...,• ' • •' '- . . 0, NI' • . . .., .:'. 0 -
.•• ......„.. ,
.,, . il. ..' .. 0,,_,
' .....•', ••• i-Jr
1,...'•--••••,•- ' ' a.., :.-.,', , ,, ' . ' ■ r. •, . •,.e,...•
l'.
.........v.:40--- ..„.. ‘,,,‘ ,,-. .... ii,4/ .• .1%. .. •„,,It •„. • _ )- .• • 4
.46,- .• ocla ,,,,.... a, _ lli . • . / • • •
.-• P i .
.,. . X, t e Ia. .+I,I NI' I.'S • .... .,...WS-,- * 0
;2, irZ■oo • , illr••••ow..._„_, . ..,._.;. ". • ' ' .0 ilk‘a.''. S., 4.7.-... ,' T , . t
Ili
11., •
• ,• ,i'l;i.-■
\ ... W . , ' oNiffa .;.•.;!•••=. . le. oli. :Oa •,s'::‘40,aik'a ei,.:•••\ „, .., ,,,,„ .
,,,,.... .. .40. ,,,... ...• , .„ • :so f •-• .
.; ... ,... ;
...#.1.0 4 -,.: ii•it:r• ‘ 47' ..0 r-'r v....? 4)* 41•4114 11...'• .1,,, PI 1 ,• • , ' r'::...;.:',.. '.
,e. .• e.. .. iiirre :,-- , • ibl.
. „Ace • ,._.-• 400.: .,„‘.., ,,,,t, . . - 4PI. . .:, __:.,i'• ...•
.1. ,
0 ' ' A•k • 4. .f 110001:• '47•' '4' fa f •• - •-
%* • 1. --A -•
'41
. .' " . t VP I -•"°' ' '
--r. ''• r' 14 V. ... ? • ‘, -..; • .•
r . • .60r, • ,,, . .. '1, ',. likl A ,, II*, . . NO ,' '44!
::•. V , V' SL ,•':, ,IT , ,..: "I• r• 1...
• . le•••. Iiii• •'•-e' ". • • ' 41 .. • '' ' j •
-1,4r
. 41i, .•'-'%•-'• ...:••' . ‘ - - . .>" .,' t ii. •
.1,'• . . ,
, .
A
4, ti- •• ' " • . - `• ' i- - • * • •
%, t • ;AIL
. ''
' • ! • ' ' ' .. ". ;1 A I.:•' ... .. .. 1111 .,'',.k.:.. .i.'
t•
.':' . •....'.
of,
• ,,. ''. y , .,:-.-...0 .. / ... .. • • . A • J.••47. 7 •
- • •. .•••?* E
, , ,
' I) -I,
• _ Ca
, ,
.. f• - , ,
• i a-
.7 • . IP, - • c....• •-,.i %14'`:!:.' •-',4 3. 0 la
-.0'1 •
• -X
gr ' •
• . , . ,,, • ,...,..,,..,, .,: •, •-,....4, .
' e••••_••':' " ?f,' . . . • , f • jAI . 1..,...• : .• • • . • - al
0
. , ,6 k4.• -le.,.. r- A.- • ,• ., ,11•••• • ".1 (1 • . •• . .44.
, .1,..,, •J ...:,- , al .- .-•-‘• .1;1$• .. g 4) 111
4-,110- -., ..
' .v.„ 4.k-el . .L-0,,,ke, ,AL, ,.. .1 ;...4.,:. - .L.z h,., ■ ' ken,, % 3 .
. ; -• '-'T •oetai&. trivia..,.,-,-,,:w..e. • . 4,..,:."-1.,.! •-,,,!.47.,,• • •• -• -,' /
ce .6 i
ii...- ,,,L. :• ,. ,x- e, JP r- t - ikikt, ...7, Vi `.•'' '-•-r • • -1,,.I', '
I i
Z 0
• - 'ik kk .k 1
illt, : .P.'',:* la','*a' -.. a:,‘, ,Silt "1 ".•'2.71'•..• -4•4• * ' . ..i:.
0 1 3
( -_,--1
. .4 n ilr;4. r ., ,,• _ f '
- - . Ak lord•ii,—• ° - 1 1
i• iiskIPN-1,w ' ,---- - • ,.. 1• • , ',A,;04,'■.-1.r• ••*‘-‘11wirre.
)., --,' !',C,:i'l,,Li k: .•'•-•-•Ty,ik,.. 1.--
ien,:p,..• ' . •••- - • 4., - „.., .. ._ r il." •■.,
. ''---
A L. / 1 C•__1 .R T.. E I F 11 ?j i 1 .� - 1 1.__4 _et it I 1 `1 M y 1 O I p
IJ :a>x Z, 16'1 .1*
•j - �wasa. I ; `I'
El.'i N I�� } 7
• a. � ® Iy.� .. `"_ _•ice .!� ` - ` '
__ 21 ... alpM...R1• •` • ' S ww+•w - /l /�" , 6.6,6,A.arwa.aa.w.n..o.ro _
_ �'f� „.� r rows relwfwWi Are BMWfrwc.w.
��- _ 1 ��—=_ .. r �,..•.•}g,�; '7+ .46•.:44:...,, r--__"T'\ rt ._ r ,--/-1 _ * /.i 6
t Y 1
MONT
tiva.l...:c 14.246661
". r i
•
cirali
• �. K�11 1 fir+' r it .L`C ) u�w`w,w'ow,.waArsw a
4.6
r ..cw.r]]�.==.ew �•twMe Ml/+rRrf Mat Bawl wn.. y 6
- ! _ i S I . _.
w ;14 r' -- -- -- .. i_ ..- - -- - -- --
_ - - _ 1 S---
• — T♦ --•••11-•I _ -- - • _
_ -.—
_ .-- .— •
_ _
EXHISIT
j41 — i* z 4 9 ` �: �r ^.. „w Mt oao..r..s
-
u••rortl
li
w.Y..r r Mw UI�'K f1wfE7bIF
w •n :.rr
CLACKAMAS BOULEVARD N0 PORTLMO AVENUE ��.rwl.w
a �riidji *s Consultants MOM — — Lake Oswego•Tigard AMER SYSTEM vF#.IXTs
It wr..:=..saw. r.awr... ft... - - r„ DRa1MNGS (fI�J Water Partnership ��
ai C ... . ..,.,.r,...... CUICKAMAS BOULEVARD 1-CIP-03
WATER MAIN PLAN AND PROFILE
A 6 I C I E I G I 4 •
A I1 } G I 0 1 E I f H 1 1 I J I K I L I 14 1 N I 0 I P
1 IC
..rw... 11 •
'� i
p1 1 I M.Ira ....w rr.yrrr
r ,a Mawr wM.awl.mt 411.1.0.41.�rrrs r
-�- .4._ 1- GEEEKII!2m.
t - I z_.;- L ...h1.•-, - _1-. - .• I 1-as a.AU Otaec,IC•w rotra.IdA.n
` 1 .. _ .M••at1.0.raaM.AlO Smen te.t1C.1•.A -mom=re
• e • 6
{ �i ,_—._
-r.— r a—r--■ r-.�r ..rte._ n r - .._O' „ _r_r.7 11 •
III • '+• COMIRLICm.&OM, 'i:_I V I
• ' lr's alma.• A NG I AKA A•P.O.1 It••.{.
■
MEM,MO.rr...CW4aW a.O
1lae
•
6
1
:_,...-. :s a }3 i a :Ii
a
•t
. - --� ,r
•
_ ... _. - _ _ s
s I-
►r r
is <. „r .• M ••
,,�,,o,,,r�•�„„ .,.� _ -
•w
.••- . /ROME
•-••• m
- 719. •NI" . 1 are a
cvoae4..
• L a^'p...Iwo• ' tAQMIAS 60(AF . AND PORMNO NV51111E i 041111.51/.Rli1 CaMtatl(lb Nos. ._ -
- Lake Oswego-Tigard VAMP srananrvnornsNT5
rj "•`q - .v I) .MNGS wale Partnership ppRTLAMUAVENUE WATER MAIN ••Y`:ea
PLAN AND PROFILE 1-CIP-04
N A 6 ■ G 1 b E d 1 1 Y I i Y I N T 0 �y -
A L al C 0 1 1 1 f 1 AL I M I 1 1 1 1 Y ] k M A 0 •
- �r
' RLY //
aMrann r•y,e%P r.W.K ` r i
/MMONiII.,Y�..IM..M . 1 �[
aairrno.wrowrac a ;� - __ -/-- - �- -��.. ��- -^ IC
ti'. M.M.L. ...,- --,..,___ 4 I ._
. ..„,
..._,„__ ,_,_
_. _ ,... . .„...: .
� sp `L ` %T a •
aw'u.meA
y�(1100 1 1D�d10111WF/1Ep RIKM IQr/a0
._'.�.~ __ ____ M ___• _- _ .. _� _ I 2 SEE trEET is f011 Ia21310Ei as
�.. . '•"._..�+•r�i- ^_r—` '`' �Ff I—`•'— _. - -� ' - • - �•
^i■.�.�. .-=+- .� -s . � �
� •wo.rarovucra swa [zr..
S
m.acrra ,w• oemr
� a�'0
Vlo. R _ 21.
ammo
< `
., 0001
0
a M
g
! •ae>•R __- --_
6
II
22 1 5
a
D t
s a
iL i 'a ��.
!� ate a - 1i` !
t= = �' � s �
+va2. ••.mr..�
9 ev Q we•ns r -:Sprit.X.r ]P�1 I NNW
-fit Ka odyka ld Ca�+r�rds m.� .. • • - - I take Oswego Tigard =mom
RELOCATION '0' , +
it mwru-w.-wc'o.n,ca�orr.s r�� -�t"'� DRAWINGS MB
MI
,� ...� ;_, Water Partnership &INCH DISTRIBUTION MAIN PLAN AND .,
a- �� so.
`".°,..�-, •1-'•1 PROFILE STA 5+60 TO 10+70 1-R-01
``e -��w +.• - ,e?«.. ...... ® IELORUM --
BAR PARK RD --GP A I C T T I I i G 1 K I l I W ❑ +p y
- EXHIBIT
E (I)
I
1lNNAbrwn if 1
MASCHLIII!STS 1•0
girga
Me SHEET 1411.01
r t 1
•
a
1MSC111M! S1* 10•10 SU OHM/wM
Af
N
•
► w W • 1 • • 1 .▪ T • T • ►
A,:
■ 1 c 1 o 1 e 1 r I 1 x I k I j A . I M i N t a t o
1.......,. swat Warn .
•
/
.lr�rrr� 4a - re
`'�� .:4A V.
•
ff.tea ..— ._r— — — — _� in•�.�..- M �_— _ •_—._� • \ `� �t eo,rnr r+aw OFO06�w 101 MI._.._.4......
... -- 4_ —.________joie — ._ -. — _. —. .- - —�� a r.rrr+.�s,.e...rrarrx
X WO/MOM
I.WL �iSS • —•�- -.- a Cr.,mamas U JOWL
MSSOMENI
f vaana.cm(WPM ovum rr Ma
�— - me.a 71017101112 r maecx
a
S.AL et.000/almu.Jk@lSYF
A.[!
__
t - i =—� S __I �-: �_._f . I ] - 0 r -. =- I � . �o n ��_ _ _ to ✓ i i
❑ JJ U r
\--t ALAN . t
ALAN
' lam.fw•
I
•
a
S L
y - - - wraa- •-
3
Y ,
a
I ii EXHIlIiy�
- R, . 3
1p= y*
r �ei. ad 3 rr_ 2
s a ' PRELIMINARY N.F.C.1 �� sa*OU[' �-
....
Krv,eetAJenb Cawulrar.ls NM!. ;)••a:• 100% Lake OIMCgo•Tigard oturr.ctocAnpY r�
Jr. a...+��_ ` .� '°° Sl1�NTTAL Water Partnership B.INCH DISTRIBUTION MAIN Pt AN AND mom
•� 1-R-02
s �� .+ •,��y+ �"" '" ""�"�'^ PROFILE STA 5+40.00 TO 8+62.15
1.7 "'.1.4.+ - 1 - i MELDRUM BAR PARK RD
OW o
A 1 S ' se i 1 I I I 0' r G I ■ -I J- 1 K i L I M I N t 0 f P
AIS-1756 2. C.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: Consider a Resolution Acknowledging and Commending EJ Albaugh for
His Service as Tigard High School Student Envoy to the City of Tigard
Submitted By: Carol Krager, City Management
Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council
Business
Meeting-
Main
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Shall Council approve a Resolution acknowledging and commending EJ Albaugh for his service as the Tigard
High School Student Envoy to the City of Tigard.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Motion to approve resolution.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Tigard High School Associated Student Body President EJ Albaugh has ably performed as Tigard High School
Student Envoy to the Tigard City Council by attending Council meetings and reporting on school activities
and milestones.
At the end of the school year,council has traditionally considered a resolution acknowledging the envoy for
his or her service.This is EJ's last meeting as he will be graduating on June 6,2014.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS,POLICIES, MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION
N/A
Attachments
No file(s)attached
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
FOR
Tigard High School Envoy Report (DATE OF MEETING)
May 13th 2014
Sports:
• Boys golf was named Pacific Conference Champions
Headed to State next week
• Boys and Girls Tennis districts are coming up
• Boys Baseball defeats Tualatin after a loss at home
Arts:
• Guys and Dolls just finished its last performance on Saturday,
starring the state recognized performers, as well as Prom king and
queen Paul Harestead and Audrey O'farrel
School:
• Our Tigard Pride Week was a success, honoring all students in
categories such as, "Pride", "Service", and "Most Improved".
• The highschool debuted the brand new "Distinguished Alumni" wall,
honoring the 6 alumni at the Tigard Pride Assembly.
• I B testing has begun
• Seniors Graduate in 24 days.
• Prom was a huge success!
The school year is coming to a close, and a new age of Leadership at
THS is coming with the departure of tenured advisor Mindy Yarnell. The
new advisor is Mackenzie Coulson, and the new ASB President is
Carter Kruse, who will be taking over for me with the THS Envoy
reports.
City Council Update May 2014 SUPPLEMENTAL 1 )/ 7 ACV T
FOR r t
Chamber Events (DATE OF MEETING)
Good Morning Tigard (GMT), Thursday A.M. Networking 7:30 a.m.—Weekly
• 5/15/14—American Cancer Society at Landmark Ford
• 5/22/14—CrossFlT PAW at their location
• 5/29/14—City of Tigard at City Hall
Tigard Young Professionals
• After Hours— First Tuesday of each month 6-8 p.m.
• Breakfast of Champions, Education Series—4th Tuesday of each month 8-9 a.m. @ Bridge City Café
0 5/27/14—Using Travel to Benefit Your Business
Other Chamber Events & Highlight
Sip, Savor, Celebrate 6/23/14 5-6:30 p.m.—Annual Chamber Meeting After Hours at the Broadway Rose—Wine,
Appetizers, Highlights of this Year, Plans for next and voting in of new board members, honoring those rolling off.
Online Webinars in May(Members Only)
• Small Business Owner:Top 25 Best Online Tools—5/15/14
• Twitter 101: So I've Got a Twitter Account Know What? —5/21/14
Check our event calendar at http://business.tigardchamber.org/events/calendar/for locations and hosting companies
Tigard Farmers Market Update
Tigard Farmers Market opened Mother's Day Sunday May 11th We had our best opening day in years, big thank you to
the Mayor for ringing our opening bell for our 21St season. Check out some new vendors including specialty baskets,
utility bucket decorator planters, and sandwiches from House of Bread. Andy Turner, with Mysteries of Magic did magic
tricks for kids and we expect him at the Market frequently. Look for more kid friendly and demo activities this year
through new business partnerships. Learn more at www.tigardfarmersmarket.org
Downtown Updates
Downtown Tigard's 3rd Friday in May is this week 5/16/14. Check local merchants closer to that date for specials and
check the facebook page at www.facebook.com/exploredowntowntigard. All merchants are open during construction
you may just need to park a couple of blocks away and walk. Use the new public lot on Burnham or other available
parking lots.
Save the dates:
• May Downtown Dialogue 5/21/14 4:30-6 pm. — Using Events to Benefit Your Business, Voting in of Bylaws and
Board Members
• New Explore Downtown Tigard Art Walk brought to you by the Tigard Downtown Alliance, 6/2-6/22.
• 3rd Annual Explore Downtown Tigard Street Fair, Saturday 8/16/14.
We have secured Timber Joey
Learn what there is to do in Downtown Tigard on Facebook at www.facebook.com/exploredowntowntigard and at
www.exploredowntowntigard.com
T16ARA AREA
-._ ` F' Explore
DOWNTOWN
` tigardyoungprofessionals MARKET Ti•and
It %sm ��^-"!0 tMwtt stalest deWMt,atmt GROW 4:ATNIIt 14%1..
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-E CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: May 13, 2014
(Please keep remarks to around 2-5 minutes. If a large number of citizens have signed in, the Mayor may ask
that testimony be kept to around 2 minutes.)
The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve
your concerns through staff.
This is a City of Tigard public meeting,subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All
written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend
or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public
record.
NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF
Please Print CONTACTED
Name: jiQ:Ve. 6,),41,r1
CD 141 riCi AJD
Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will
help the presiding officer pronounce: IL a
Address 13
City
State Zip 61-9'773
Phonc No. 1.373 r; 2 -7-e25-1111
Name: -31 M. � G
Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will
help the presiding officer pronounce:
tc 73 u �--
Address
City fl. G
State Zips-3
Phone No.
Name:
Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will
help the presiding officer pronounce:
Address
City
State Zip
Phone No.
CITIZEN COMMUNICATION
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
FOR 7914 y / 3 a 2/ ti
Mayor Cook, members of the Council, (DATE OF METING)
CI-11 2-e 5rn .
Tonight, on behalf of the citizens of Tigard, our group,Tigard First! Is making a formal complaint to
you, our elected representatives, regarding the street widening project at 72nd and Dartmouth, which
you will be considering in this meeting.
By allocating City Gas Tax funds for this project, you are in violation of the Tigard Municipal Code,
which states that Gas Tax money will be spent according to a priority list determined by the Tigard
Transportation Advisory Committee. This project was not on the list for this fiscal year, and by going
ahead with the project, you are depriving the city's neighborhoods of needed improvements which we
have been patiently waiting for you to address.
This project is simply another cave-in to Walmart, helping to insure that the 7000 additional cars,
which will visit the store every single day, will find their way into the parking lot with a minimum of
inconvenience. Meanwhile,the people of the city continue to have to walk in ditches, or the roads for
lack of sidewalks. We deserve better.
Mr Ramis, we are asking you to investigate our allegations,and take corrective action to bring the city's
actions into compliance with the city code. We are also asking for an audit of how city gas tax funds
have been used since the tax was implemented. We are asking you to do you jobs and act in the best
interests of the taxpayers of this city.
Steve Bintliff
Tigard First!
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
FOR 7'72a ' °/y
(DATE OF MEETING) May 13, 2014
(10)-}iw
Tigard City Council and Planning Commission
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
RE Safety Issues and the Oak Street Estates.
Good evening Councilors and Mayor -
I'm here tonight mostly for safety issues.
First of all, the City of Tigard is being remiss in not widening SW 72nd Avenue
between the big box stores on SW Dartmouth and Pacific Highway. This is that
segment in the "Tigard Triangle"where the homeless camp was disbanded late last
year. It is particularly dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists in that there are no
sidewalks for a majority of that length. While the City of Tigard is spending $1.55
million on improvements to 72nd Avenue south of Dartmouth, it is at this time
investing none north of Dartmouth on 72nd Avenue.
Second of all, it was exactly six months ago today (on 11/12/13] that over fifty
residents attended a Neighborhood Meeting about the Armory development now
called "Oak Street Estates,"just west of the Willamette Meridian in what was the old
"Town of Metzger." This is an area Metzger annexed into the City of Tigard years
ago without receiving some of the promised infrastructure improvements.
The acoustics at the Neighborhood meeting were not good in the cafeteria and many
people complained that they couldn't hear the Developer's representative and asked
him to speak louder. He said he was speaking as loud as he could. Quite a lot (over a
dozen) of the people attending the meeting left early because they couldn't hear
him.
Many local Tigard residents stated that traffic along SW Oak Street is already
dangerous, especially during rush hour, with many cars, some speeding, and with no
sidewalks on either side. It is also dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists at night
because there are no streetlights.
At that Neighborhood meeting and subsequent CP04M meetings the following
issues, requests, and unanswered questions were discussed, and unanimously
approved at two CP04M meetings for submission to the City of Tigard.
1. What do "System Development Charges" (SDC) ($5,000-$7,000/house) cover?
2. What is the City of Tigard plan for improvements to handle the increased
traffic?
3. We request to City of Tigard that sidewalks are needed not just in front of Oak
Street development but the length of SW Oak Street from 65th to 69th
4. We request to the City of Tigard use traffic calming devices, e.g. speed bumps,
on this segment of SW Oak Street.
5. What will be done to mitigate the impacts of this proposed development?
6. There is not a park for over 15 blocks, where will the children play? We request
a park or green space or open space be provided within the development.
7. Request traffic study for traffic light (left turn) at 69th and Pacific Hwy #99.
8. Could the City of Tigard/AKS/developer buy land for park space?
9. There was a big landslide in the mid-1990s at the north side of the property.
It's really steep with a 50% grade. Residents are concerned about these
sensitive lands and water run-off. We think the City of Tigard should want to be
cautious about approving anything with sensitive lands (e.g. the Bull Mountain
house).
10. Where will there be Affordable Housing?
I'd be glad to answer any questions you may have.
The CP04M will be also submitting theses comments and others by the
Thursday May 15th administrative deadline.
Sincerely'
�-L.�
'---Ji Long, Chair, CP04M
03-647-0021
AIS-1729 3,
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: PROCLAIM MAY 18-24 AS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK
Prepared For Joanne Bengtson,City Management
Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson,City Management
Item Type: Update, Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Proclamation
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Should Mayor Cook proclaim May 18-24 as EMS Week?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
Issue the Proclamation.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Emergency Medical Services Week honors Tigard's emergency medical personnel for their exemplary
day-to-day lifesaving service as medicine's front line. These dedicated men and women are an asset to the
Tigard community and this proclamation helps bring recognition to the important role they play in our
region's sophisticated system of emergency medical care.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Tigard has issued an Emergency Medical Services Week proclamation annually since 2000.
J
Attachments
EMS Proclamation
,, - � t
4 . �. y � i
I x... k ,' . .. • ' '1. ., • A. . .y
it / 4..Y+.1 k .0 %..?t.... •,
1;
•..., iii,, .., ..*,.
i----,/ (4 "Aifivirio.1 1100;i4 /40, 4 ._.
...........1
cAn of Tigard .
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK *.
I May 18-24, 2014
WHEREAS, Emergency Medical Services is a vital service to the community, the 4.
members of emergency medical service teams are ready to provide compassionate,
lifesaving care to those in need 24-hours a day, seven days a week;and
WHEREAS.Access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and
recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and ti • :•r•
WHEREAS, EMS plays a critical role in public outreach and injury prevention, and is ��{;
evolving in its role as an important member of the healthcare community; and ti ,,
WHEAREAS,The emergency medical services system includes paramedics,
firefighters, law enforcement officers, emergency physicians, emergency nurses.
emergency medical technicians, emergency medical dispatchers, educators and 0
administrators;and
try
WHEREAS,The members of emergency medical services teams,whether career or If~
_;; ,T: volunteer,enhance their lifesaving skills by completing thousands of hours of '_'
specialized training and continuing education:and `
WHEREAS, Tigard residents benefit daily from the knowledge and skill acquired by l'
r. r 1
these highly trained individuals, it is appropriate to recognize the value and
A. accomplishments of emergency medical service providers. 1
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I,John L. Cook, Mayor of the City of
Tigard,Oregon,do hereby proclaim the week of May 18--24, 2014 as
~fir ,
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK V
in Tigard,Oregon and encourage people throughout the city to honor these brave men
and women for a job well done
Dated this day of , 2014 .
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of ;
- ' the City of Tigard to be affixed. ; #
I
/ 1'
•4
John L. Cook, Mayor
City of Tigard Ir
Attest: '--.1-,'
• 11.
-`?r ,
City Recorder
rt
it rFT- =� � ��. f, f � -,0
ws . J • .,
•
AIS-1771 4, A.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): Consent Item
Agenda Title: Receive and File: Council Calendar and Council Tentative Agenda
Submitted By: Carol Krager,City Management
Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Consent -
Receive and
File
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Receive and file the Council Calendar and the Tentative Agenda for future council meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
No action is requested; these are for information purposes.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached are the Council Calendar and the Tentative agenda for future Council meetings.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
N/A-Receive and File Items
•
Attachments
Tentative Agenda
1
Agenda Item No.
A- 1
For Agenda of May 13.2014
•
_ MEMORANDUM
TIGARD
TO: Honorable Mayor&City Council/City Center Development Agency Board
FROM: Carol A. Kroger,Deputy City Recorder
RE: Three-Month Council/CCDA Meeting Calendar
DATE: May 13,2014
May
6 Tuesday City Center Development Agency–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
13* Tuesday Council Business Meeting-- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
20* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
27* Tuesday Council Business Meeting–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
June
3 Tuesday City Center Development Agency Meeting Cancelled
10* Tuesday Council Business Meeting-- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
17* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
24* Tuesday Council Business Meeting–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
July
1 Tuesday City Center Development Agency–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
8* Tuesday Council Business Meeting-6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
15* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
22* Tuesday Council Business Meeting–6:30 p.m.,Town Hall
Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk(*).
I:\adm\city council\council calendar\3-month calendar for c mtg 140513.doc
Meeting Banner Business Meeting ❑
Study Session Special Meeting
Consent Agenda Meeting is Full 0
Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting 0
City Council Tentative Agenda
5/5/2014 9:24 AM - Updated
Form Meeting Submitted Meeting Title Inbox or
# Date By Type Department Finalized
I —AL-- --- -
1608 05/06/2014 (Cathy 11AAA May 6, 2014 - CCDA Meeting - Marty absent
(Wheatley I
I 1
1764 05/06/2014 Cathy CCDA 0 Consent Item - Approve City Center Development Agency— Administrative 04/28/201
Wheatley Board Minutes Services 4
1688 05/06/2014 Sean CCDA 1 60 Minutes - Downtown Public Space Community 04/29/201
Farrelly Development 4
1746 05/06/2014 Sean CCDA 2 15 Minutes - CCDA Board Consideration of Amendment #1 to Community 04/29/201
Farrelly the City Center Urban Renewal Plan for Property Acquisition Development 4
1754 05/06/2014 can CCDA 3 5 Minutes - Council Consideration of Amendment #1 to City Community 04/29/201
Farrell Center Urban Renewal Plan Development 4
1755 05/06/2014 Sean CCDA 4 10 Minutes - Approve the Purchase of the Miller Property and Community 04/29/201
Farrelly Authorize the Executive Director of the CCDA to Complete the Development 4
Property Purchase
1760 05/06/2014 Toby CCDA 5 10 Minutes - CCDA Resolution authorizing indebtedness Financial and 04/29/201
LaFrance through an IGA with the City of Tigard Information 4
Services
1761 05/06/2014 Toby CCDA 6 5 Minutes - City Resolution authorizing financing of an urban Financial and 04/29/201
1 LaFrance renewal capital project and IGA with the City Center Renewal Information 4
AEI Agency Services
1f Total Time: 105 of 180 minutes have been scheduled
r
III
1IPage
is\adm\carol\tentaty ag\2014\may 5 2014.docx
Meeting Banner Business Meeting ❑
Study Session Special Meeting
Consent Agenda Meeting is Full
Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting
City Council Tentative Agenda
5/5/2014 9:24 AM - Updated
11609 05/13/2014�Cathy AAA May 13, 2014 Business Meeting - Councilor Woodard 1
L I Wheatley Absent.
I _ ---- --II
1704'05/13/2014k Wheatley ICCBSNS 120 Minutes - Metro Councilor Craig Dirksen IAdmin Services 'Newton L, I
1733 05/13/2014 Joseph Barrett ICCBSNS 110 Minutes - Discussion of Upcoming Contracts 'IFS 'Newton L, I
[1763 05/13/2014IJ Bengtson CCBSNS 'Consent Item - 1st Quarter Council Goal Update 'City Management 'Newton L, I
1749 05/13/2014 Greer Gaston CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Briefing on Agreement - Construction of Public Works Newton L, I
Water Partnership Projects in the City of Gladstone
I I 135 of 45 minutes have been scheduled II II
I1756I05/13/2014C'_arol Krager ICCBSNS 11 5 Minutes - Resolution Acknowledging EJ Albaugh 'City Management 104/16/2014 I
1729 05/13/2014 Joanne CCBSNS 1 5 Minutes - Proclaim May 18-24, 2014 as Emergency City Management 04/21/2014
Bengtson edical Services Week I
1699105/13/2014 Joseph Barrett CCBSNS 3 5 Minutes - Contract Award - 72nd/Dartmouth FIS Newton L,
II Intersection Improvements I
1695 05/13/2014 Joseph Barrett CBSNS 4 5 Minutes - Contract Award - Construction FIS Newton L,
Management for 72nd & Dartmouth Intersection &
Widening Project
1696 05/13/2014 Joseph Barrett rCBSNS 5 5 Minutes - Contract Award - Planning, Design, and FIS Newton L,
Construction Mgmt Services for East Tigard Sewer Project
1709 05/13/201411Julia Jewett ICCBSNS _ 16 5 Minutes - Alarm Systems Ordinance TMC 11.08 Police Newton L, I
1751 05/13/2014 Mark CCBSNS 7 10 Minutes - Adopt Ordinance adopting TVF&R Fire Community 04/28/2014 I
VanDomelen Code Ordinance No. 14-01 Development
1762 05/13/2014 Greer Gaston CCBSNS 8 10 Minutes - Adopt a Resolution Approving the Public Works Newton L, Assistant
Westside Trail Master Plan and Adding that Plan to the City Manager
Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan
1742 05/13/2014 Cheryl Caines CCBSNS 9 20 Minutes - Update for Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan Community Newton L, Assistant)
•Development City Manager
1759 05/13/2014 Carol Krager CCBSNS 10 15 Minutes - Google Hut License Agreement City Management Newton L, Assistant
Template City Manager
Time: 120 of 101
- - -- I
2 I Page
is\adm\carol\tentaty ag\2014\may 5 2014.doc:.
Meeting Banner Business Meeting 0
Study Session Special Meeting
Consent Agenda Meeting is Full
Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting
City Council Tentative Agenda
5/5/2014 9:24 AM - Updated
1610 05/20/2014 Cathy - AA May 20, 2014 Workshop Meeting - Meeting is closed.
Wheatley Primary Election Day I
I II
166405/20/2014 Toby LaFrance CCWKSHO 60 Minutes - River Terrace Finance Strategies Update Financial and LaFrance T,
Information Fin/Info Svcs
- Services Director
1 — IlTotal Time: 60 of 180 minutes have been scheduled
—II
1611 05/27/2014 Cathy AAA May 27, 2014 Business Meeting
Wheatley I
II
1524 05/27/2014 Greer Gaston ACCSTUDY 30 Minutes - Briefing and Discussion on the Development Public Works Koellermeier D,
of a Willamette River Water Supply in Conjunction with Public Works Dir
the City of Sherwood
'
1698 05/27/2014Joseph Barrett ACCSTUDY 10 Minutes - Discussion on Upcoming Contracts Financial and Barrett J, Sr Mgmt
Information Analyst - Finance
Services
1743 05/27/2014 Greer Gaston 'ACCSTUDY 5 Minutes - Briefing on an Agreement with CWS and Public Works Murchison R,
Beaverton Regarding the Construction of Water and .enior Project
I
Sewer Lines to Serve River Terrace n•ineer
I -- II
1750 05/27/2014 Greer Gaston ACONSENT Consent Item - Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Public Works Gaston G, Conf
Agreement Regarding the Construction of Water Executive Asst
Partnership Projects in the City of Gladstone
—II
168905/27/2014 oanne CCBSNS 5 Minutes - 2014 Winners of if I Were Mayor, I Would" ity Management Bengtson 3, Exec
Ben tson Contest Asst to City Mgr I
1705 05/27/2014 Joseph Barrett CBSNS 5 Minutes - Contract Award - Police Mobile Data Financial and Barrett J, Sr Mgmt
Computers Upgrade Project Information Analyst - Finance
Services
j If Total Time: 10 of 100 minutes have been scheduled
I
3 1 Page
is\adm\carol\tentaty ag\2014\may 5 2014.docx
Meeting Banner I Business Meeting ❑
Study Session Special Meeting
Consent Agenda Meeting is Full
Workshop Meeting ❑ CCDA Meeting
City Council Tentative Agenda
5/5/2014 9:24 AM - Updated
1612 06/03/2014 Cathy AA June 3, 2014 CCDA Meeting - Cancelled.
Wheatley
i —
1613 06/10/2014 Cathy
AA June 10, 2014 Business Meeting
(Wheatley
__ I
F
11
1753'06/10/2014IGreer Gaston (ACCSTUDY 1 15 Minutes - Executive Session on Real Property Public Works 04/17/2014
Transactions
1738 06/10/2014 Renee ACCSTUDY 10 Minutes - Briefing on an Agreement with Washington Public Works McCarthy M,
Ferguson County Regarding Traffic Signals at the Intersection of St/Trans Sr Proj
Durham/Upper Boones Ferry Roads Eng
170606/10/2014 Joseph Barrett ACCSTUDY 10 Minutes - Discussion of Upcoming Contracts Financial and Barrett J, Sr Mgmt
Information Analyst - Finance
Services
1757 06/10/2014 Greer Gaston ACCSTUDY 10 Minutes - Discussion on Adjusting the Work in Right of Public Works McCarthy M,
Way Fee Structure St/Trans Sr Proj
Eng
L II
1744 06/10/2014 Greer Gaston ACONSENT Consent Item - Authorize the Mayor to Execute an Public Works aston G, Conf
Agreement with CWS and Beaverton Regarding the Executive Asst
Construction of Water and Sewer Lines to Serve River
Terrace
F _ -- - II
1672 06/10/2014 Liz Lutz CBSNS 5 Minutes - Amend and Update the Street Maintenance Financial and LaFrance T,
Fee Code Information Fin/Info Svcs
Services Director
1720 06/10/2014 Liz Lutz CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Resolution Certifying that the City of Tigard Financial and Lutz L, Conf Exec
Provides Services Qualifying for State-Shared Revenues Information Asst
Services
1721 06/10/2014 Liz Lutz 'CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Resolution Declaring the City's Election to Financial and Lutz L, Conf Exec
Receive State Revenue Sharing Information Asst
i Services
4 11) a g
is\adm\carol\tentaty ag\2014\may 5 21)14.docx
Meeting Banner SI Business Meeting ❑
Study Session Special Meeting
Consent.lgenda Meeting is Full
Workshop Meeting ❑ CCDA Meeting
City Council Tentative Agenda
5/5/2014 9:24 AM - Updated
1722 06/10/2014 Liz Lutz CCBSNS 10 Minutes - Adopt Citywide Master Fees and Charges Financial and Lutz L, Conf Exec
Schedule Replacing Res 13-26 and Subsequent Information Asst
Amendments and Resolution Adopting Misc.Solid Waste Services
172306/10/2014 Liz Lutz CCBSNS 15 Minutes - Budget Financial and 'Lutz L, Conf Exec
Information Asst
Services
1724 06/10/2014 Liz Lutz 5 Minutes - Adopt CCDA FY 2015 Budget with Financial and Lutz L, Conf Exec
Adjustments, Make Appropriations, and Impose and Information Asst
Catrgorize Taxes-Resolution Services
1734 06/10/2014 Joseph Barrett CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Contract Award - 2014 PMP Pavement Financial and Barrett 3, Sr Mgmt
Overlay Project Information Analyst - Finance
Services
1736 06/10/2014 Joseph Barrett CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Contract Award - 2014 PMP Pavement Crack Financial and Barrett J, Sr Mgmt
Sealing Information Analyst - Finance
Services
If Total Time: 55 of 100 minutes have been scheduled
it
1614 06/17/2014Cathy AAA June 17, 2014 Workshop Meeting
heatley
1586 06/17/2014�Greer Gaston CCWKSHOP 15 Minutes - Briefing on Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Public Works Stone Mike, City I
l Projects Engineer
1671 06/17/2014 Debbie Smith- CCWKSHOP 60 Minutes - River Terrace Financing Plan Update Financial and
Wagar Information
Services
1712 06/17/2014 Lloyd Purdy CCWKSHOP 15 Minutes - Update on Economic Development Activity Community Purdy, L, Econ
I
Development Mgr J)Development
Total Time: 90 of 180 minutes have been scheduled I
5 I Page
is\adm\carol\tcntaty ag\2014\mat• 5 2014.docx
Meeting Banner ® Business Meeting ❑
Study Session Special Meeting
Consent Agenda I Meeting is Full
Workshop Meeting ❑ CCD.1 Meeting
City Council Tentative Agenda
5/5/2014 9:24 AM - Updated
I -- II
1615 06/24/2014 Cathy AAA June 24, 2014 Business Meeting
Wheatley I
--- II
1766 06/24/2014 Sean ACCSTUDY 30 Minutes - Ash Avenue Crossing Discussion Community Farrelly S, Redev
Farrelly Development Project Manager I
f Total Time: 30 of 45 minutes have been scheduled
H
—II
1740 06/24/2014 Renee ACONSENT Consent Item - Authorize the Mayor to Execute an Agreement Public Works Gaston G, Conf
Ferguson with Washington County Regarding Traffic Signals at the Executive Asst
Intersection of Durham/Upper Boones Ferry Roads
I — II
1643 06/24/2014 Greer CBSNS 15 Minutes - Authorize the Mayor/City Manager to Execute an Public Works Koellermeier D,
Gaston Intergovernmental Agreement with King City Regarding Public Works Dir
_ ,Water System Ownership and Water Service
1707 06/24/2014 Joseph CCBSNS 10 Minutes - Contract Award - City Hall Complex EIFS Financial and Barrett J, Sr Mgmt
Barrett Restoration Construction Services Information Analyst - Finance
_ Services
1714 06/24/2014 Lloyd CCBSNS 10 Minutes - Vertical Housing Development Zone: Resolution Community Purdy, L, Econ I
Purdy Requesting Designation Development Development Mgr
1765 06/24/2014 Joseph CCBSNS 5 Minutes - Contract Award - Copper Creek Slope 'Financial and Barrett J, Sr Mgmt
Barrett Stabilization Information Analyst - Finance
Services
If Total Time: 40 of 100 minutes have been scheduled
_II
1616 07/01/2014 Cathy AAA July 1, 2014 CCDA Meeting
Wheatley I
f _ II
6 1 Page
is\adm\carol\tentaty ag\2014\may 5 2014.docx
Meeting Banner Business Meeting D
Study Session Special Meeting
Consent Agenda Meeting is Full
Workshop Meeting 0 CCDA Meeting
City Council Tentative Agenda
5/5/2014 9:24 AM - Updated
1617 07/08/2014 Cathy AAA July 8, 2014 Business Meeting
Wheatley
I
II
1711 07/08/2014 Lloyd Purdy CCBSNS 25 Minutes - Economic Opportunity Analysis Post Community Purdy, L, Econ
Acknowledgement Plan Amendment Development Development Mgr
1717'07/08/2014 Lloyd Purdy CCBSNS 15 Minutes - Tigard Enterprise Zone: Resolution Community Purdy, L, Econ
& IGA Development Development Mgr
"Total Time: 40 of 100 minutes have been scheduled
I - - II
1618 07/15/2014 Cathy AAA July 15, 2014 Workshop Meeting - Cancelled. I
Wheatley
I — 11
1619'107/22/2014"CWheatley 'AAA July 22, 2014 Workshop/Business Meeting I ll I
F II
1673 07/22/2014 Debbie Smith- ACCSTUDY 60 Minutes - River Terrace Financing Update on Financial and Smith-Wagar D, Asst I
Wagar Parks and Transportation Information Services Finance Director
Total Time: 60 of 180 minutes have been scheduled
F _ I1620 08/05/2014 Cathy AA August 5, 2014 CCDA Meeting - Cancelled.
Wheatley
F __ I
1621 08/12/2014 Cathy AAA August 12, 2014 Business Meeting L -
W
Wheatley
1 - - _ II
1622 08/19/2014 Cathy AAA August 19, 2014 Workshop Meeting - Cancelled.
Wheatley
1623f08/26/2014I'CWheatley 'AAA 'August 26, 2014 Workshop/Business Meeting II __1I
1-
II
1674 08/26/2014IDebbie Smith- ACCSTUDY 60 Minutes - River Terrace Financing Complete Financial and Smith Wagar D, Asst
agar Package Information Services Finance Director
'Total Time: 60 of 180 minutes have been scheduled
7 I Page
is\adm\carol\tentatv ag\2014\may 5 2014.docx
AIS-1767 4. B.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes):Consent Item
Agenda Title: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes
Submitted By: Carol Krager,City Management
Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent
Agenda
Public Hearing: Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Approve City Council meeting minutes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
Approve minutes as submitted.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached council minutes are submitted for City Council approval.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
N/A
Attachments
March 11,2014 Minutes
March 25,2014 Minutes
AIS-1763 4. C.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): Consent Item
Agenda Title: 1st Quarter Council Goal Update
Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson, City Management
Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson,City Management
Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Consent-
Receive and
File
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
The first quarter update on Council's 2014 goals is attached.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
n/a
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
n/a
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
n/a
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Council's 2014 Goals are featured within the update.
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
This is the first update for 2014 Council goals.
•
Attachments
2014 First Quarter Council Goal Update
City of Tigard
s N REPORT TO TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
TIGARD Council Goal Update, FIRST QUARTER 2014
COUNCIL GOAL 1: Water
Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Partnership
• Negotiate/proceed with water purchase from Lake Oswego
• Renegotiate LOTWP Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) to reflect structure and management
post-construction (evaluate future of partnership roles)
• LOTWP bond sale (#2)
• Monitor progress of construction and budget; LOTWP projects operational
Develop Willamette River Water Sources
• Rewrite WRWC member contract
• Continue to consider other sources: Sherwood, TVWD (studies)
• Develop "roadmap" for Tigard's future water decisions through 2026
Intergovernmental Water Board
• Work plan for, and next governance agreements with, Tigard Water District, Durham, King City
(expires 2017)
Communicate with Tigard residents about rate impacts/outreach regarding potential increases
1' Quarter MILESTONES:
• LOTWP Bond Sale#2 - Finance coordinated with city's Financial Advisor, team of underwriters
used for the first bond sale and city staff to develop a project schedule. Key dates include:
o November 2014 workshop to discuss results of water rate study, including impact of
additional 4 mgd of capacity in LOTWP.
o Resolution in December 2014 authorizing interim financing (if needed)
o December 2014 hearing to adopt new water rates
o Bond sale in mid-March 2015.
• The Lake Oswego-Tigard water purchase negotiation is complete.
• Based on the purchase negotiation, work is underway to restructure the LOTWP
intergovernmental agreement.
• Staff is participating in the Willamette Governance Group (Tualatin, Tualatin Valley Water
District, Sherwood, Tigard,Hillsboro, Beaverton,and Wilsonville). A draft governance document
should be ready in September 2014.
• Tigard is participating in TVWD/Hillsboro regional preliminary design study for the Willamette
Supply Project (WSP). The study is scheduled for completion in mid-2015. Progress on this goal
will follow once the preliminary study is completed. Other work on this goal will follow the
outcome of WGG governance work.
• Completed a draft replacement IGA for consideration by King City Council. Staff anticipates
King City Council will adopt it.
• On-going:
Monitor progress of construction and budget; LOTWP projects and operational discussions
continue.
Tigard Water Service Area customers received communications via Know H2O newsletter in
December 2014 regarding 14 percent water rate increase effective January 1, 2014.
o Staff continues communicating with Tigard Water Service Area customers about rate
impacts/outreach regarding potential increases due to additional capacity/delivery opportunity.
REPORT TO TIGARD CITY COUNCIL I GOALS UPDATE,FIRST QUARTER,2014 I Page 2
COUNCIL GOAL 2: River Terrace
Park land acquisition (strategy,funding, land dedication)
Complete Community Plan, zoning, adopted master plans
• Building permits issued; development begins
• Service delivery planning
1' Quarter MILESTONES:
• Held two Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) meetings, two SWG Implementation
Subcommittee meetings, two Technical Advisory Committee meetings, and one Community
meeting.
• Briefed Tigard and Beaverton City Councils at a joint meeting on River Terrace and South
Cooper Mountain.
• Provided project information to Tualatin River Watershed Council, CPO 4K (King City), and
River Terrace property owners.
• Completed final draft system plans for water, sewer, and parks.
• Continued work on the transportation and stormwater proposals.
• Continued work on the finance models for each system plan.
COUNCIL GOAL. 3: Tigard Triangle
Complete Triangle Strategic Plan
• Adopt zoning, street and design standards
• Begin implementing plan strategies
lst Quarter MILESTONES:
• Developed two options with land use, transportation, open space and infrastructure alternatives
to be evaluated against project goals.
• Discussed Options 1 and 2 with TAC and CAC
• Incorporating comments and developing a preferred option.
COUNCIL GOAL 4: Southwest Corridor
Determine modes and alignment for study in federal EIS process
Determine regional route segments
Participate in federal EIS process (regional partner,financial)
1•`Quarter MILESTONES:
• Continued to identify alignment options for bus rapid transit and light rail, with input from the
community and project team.
• Worked with project designers and regional partners to conduct preliminary evaluations and
screening of alignment alternatives.
• Continued negotiations with project partners to identify appropriate participation in DEIS
funding
REPORT TO TIGARD CITY COUNCIL I GOAL UPDATE,FIRST QUARTER,2014 I Page 3
COUNCIL GOAL 5: Recreation (Evaluate o &resources to create a 'ilot rec sro;ram)
Complete demand analysis for recreation opportunities
Compare recreation inventory with demand analysis to identify needs/gaps
Council decision on city role (direct delivery provider, contract/partnerships,funding source)
• Implement a new recreation effort based on role
1'` Quarter MILESTONES:
• A team comprised of Council, PRAB representatives and staff evaluated five proposals from
consultants nationwide to provide an analysis for a possible recreation program in Tigard.
• The evaluation team interviewed the top two consultant teams in February.
• The team selected MIG for this work and worked with them to finalize the scope and timeline for
the contract. Work will be underway before the end of April
COUNCIL GOAL 6: Economic Development
Develop and adopt strategic priorities, resources, design program
Data collection and understanding the economic base
15` Quarter MILESTONES:
• Reviewed the "Commute Shed" workforce inflow/outflow infographic with Council.
• Authorized the creation of an Enterprise Zone in collaboration with Beaverton.
• Discussed the creation of a Vertical Housing Development Zone.
COUNCIL GOAL 7: Communit En:agement
Redesign community survey effort to include regular two-way communication efforts (based on
Fall, 2013 survey results)
Continue 3-4 quarterly open forums to engage residents/neighborhood groups
Community education efforts; develop fiscal report card (Blue Ribbon Task Force recommendation)
Develop Tigard's community identity
1" Quarter MILESTONES:
• A redesign of the city's website is in process that will include a one-stop citizen engagement page
that will feature everything from on-line surveys to Board and Committee and volunteer
opportunities to public hearing and meeting notices.
• The Mayor continues to hold his monthly fireside chats
• City Council will hold two town halls in the coming months.
• Staff goal teams developed work plans to begin implementing the city's 20-year strategic plan with
the vision: `The most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest where people of all ages enjoy
healthy and interconnected lives."
REPORT TO TIGARD CITY COUNCIL I GOALS UPDATE,FIRST QUARTER,2014 I Page 4
COUNCIL GOAL 8: Downtown
Urban renewal ballot measure: Tigard voters clarify authority/projects
Strategy for redevelopment of city-owned property
Resolve composition of CCDA (pros and cons: CCDA, CCAC,Econ Dev Commission to make it a
development agency)
Main St./Green St. Construction
Continue Downtown Plaza Site acquisition and design approval (contingent on site acquisition)
Continue Tigard St. Trail negotiation, design and development
Finalize downtown redevelopment opportunities (if issues can be addressed)
Advance options for rail crossing "trade" for Ash Avenue at-grade crossing
Explore Pacific Highway Urban Renewal District options
1" Quarter MILESTONES:
• In November 2013, ballot measure passed by voters.
• First amendment to Urban Renewal Plan scheduled for May 2014
• First property purchase and loan authorization scheduled for May 2014
• After January CCDA discussion, no change was made to CCDA and CCAC composition.
CCDA calendar developed to include closer collaboration between CCDA and CCAC.
• Main St./Green St. construction underway. Communication plan and information materials
developed. Weekly construction update meetings held.
• Public space feasibility study for Fanno Creek/brewpub frontage is underway. Conceptual work
completed for potential public space at Tigard St. Trail/Main St. Public space workshop with
Michele Reeves scheduled.
• ODOT Rail and railroad agreed to 99-year lease agreement with the city. Trail concept design and
cost estimates completed. Staff submitted Connect Oregon Grant V for $1.2 million to construct
trail and public space at Main Street. $300K contribution toward construction secured from
Washington County.
• CET Grant funded redevelopment feasibility work for Public Works Yard and 2" site is
underway. Developer partner secured for second downtown site. Market analysis report
completed and architect firm to work on conceptual site plan selected.
COUNCIL GOAL 9: Growth/Annexation
Successfully complete River Terrace Community Plan
• Reconsider and agree to annexation policy: reauthorize financial incentives as needed; consider
islands and remainder of Bull Mountain; incentives for voluntary annexation; timeline for
Washington County
Develop planning and timeline together with Washington County for future annexations(Bull
Mountain, Metzger)
Update annexation fiscal analysis (from 2004)
Consider annexation of urban reserves for employment land
1St Quarter MILESTONE:
• Council reauthorized the financial incentives for voluntary annexation of the previous year
without change. No substantive policy discussion occurred.
REPORT TO TIGARD CITY COUNCIL I GOAL UPDATE, FIRST QUARTER,2014 I Page 5
COUNCIL GOAL 10: Finance
Represent Tigard at the regional, state and federal level to advocate for tax reform and other
funding opportunities
Review city facilities strategy and develop options for repair and replacement ("good, better, best")
Seek voter-approved measure for major investment(capital,parks, etc.)
1" Quarter MILESTONES:
• Councilor Buehner is serving on the League of Oregon Cities Finance & Taxation Policy
Committee.
• Brian Rager is leading a small, interdepartmental work group to develop a long-term strategy
related to space and facility planning. A scope of work is being developed that will be used to
procure a consultant to work with the team to develop a strategy. All existing studies, including
the 20-year facilities plan, the space needs study for Public Works and Police will be taken into
consideration. One likely outcome of this effort will be an update of the 20-year facilities plan.
• Regarding repair and replacement, the city has a 20-year facility maintenance plan that is managed
by the Fleet and Facilities Supervisor. This plan addresses everything from paint, floor coverings,
plumbing to replacement of critical components such as HVAC units. Building condition and the
work performed on each building is tracked carefully in Public Works' maintenance management
software (now MaintStar).
• Seeking a voter-approved measure for major investment is one of the potential outcomes of Goal
4 of the Strategic Plan. At this time, it is an available option. We have not started the process of
identifying which major investment will be best suited for voter-approved funding.
AIS-1696 5.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: Contract Award - Planning, Design, and Construction Management
Services for East Tigard Sewer Project
Prepared For: Joseph Barrett
Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Financial and Information Services
Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Local
Contract
Review
Board
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for planning, design, and construction management
services on the East Tigard Sewer project to CESNW in the amount of$129,160 and authorize the City
Manager to take the necessary steps to execute the contract.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for planning,design,and construction
management services on the East Tigard Sewer project to CESNW in the amount of$129,160.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The project consists of replacing the first run of pipe,immediately southwest of Hunziker Road,and then
along a new alignment that moves the sewer line closer to the edge of the CWS vegetated corridor. Included
in the project is a new main extension southerly to Wall Street to serve that area. The East Tigard Trunk
replacement project will include topographic surveying,wetlands and sensitive lands permitting,engineering
design, construction permitting,and construction services. The following services are requested under this
contract:
•Project Research/Data Collection
•Design Survey
•Engineering Design
•Construction Services
The City issued an intermediate qualification based solicitation (IQBS) for the work on March 24,2014 to five
firms on the City's Qualified Roster:
•WHPacific
•CESNW
•Westlake Consultants
•Otak
•Harper Houf Peterson Rigellis
The proposals were due on April 8,2014 and staff received responses from two firms: CESNW and Westlake
Consultants. Staff scored them in accordance with the criteria set forth in the IQBS and determined CESNW
to be the most qualified proposer. Staff and CESNW entered into negotiations and the parties agreed to a
final price for the work of$129,160. As this is inline with staffs estimate for the work, staff recommends the
Local Contract Review Board award the contract to CESNW in this amount.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The Local Contract Review Board may reject this award and direct staff to reissue the IQBS.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The Local Contract Review Board discussed this contract at their April 15th workshop.
Fiscal Impact
Cost: $129,160
Budgeted (yes or no): Yes
Where budgeted?: Sanitary Sewer Fund
Additional Fiscal Notes:
The total amount of this contract is $129,160 and is in the sanitary sewer funds FY 2013-14 budget.
•
Attachments
No files)anached.
•
AIS-1695 6.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: Contract Award - Construction Management for 72nd& Dartmouth
Intersection&Widening Project
Prepared For: Joseph Barrett
Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Financial and Information Services
Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Local
Contract
Review
Board
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for construction management services on the 72nd&
Dartmouth Intersection& Widening project to WHPacific in the amount of$160,000 and authorize the City
Manager to take the necessary steps to execute the contract.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for construction management services
on the 72nd& Dartmouth Intersection project to WHPacific in the amount of$160,000.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The 72nd Ave / Dartmouth St Intersection is currently configured as an 'all-way-stop' resulting in traffic
congestion especially during peak commute hours. 72nd Ave south of the intersection is very narrow and lacks
sidewalks or bike lanes and is in need of widening. Adjacent proposed private developments have been
conditioned to install a traffic signal at this intersection, but these conditions do not include all of the elements
necessary to complete the intersection and street widening. Street widening will occur as part of this project.
The City and the Engineer of Record have designed improvements to complete the five lane improvements in
all directions. The design of the intersection has been completed to add to the interim improvements resulting
in the ultimate improvement for the intersection. Work under this contract shall include:
•Contract Administration
•Construction Management and Support
•Construction Monitoring and Inspection
•Survey Verification as Needed
•As-Built Preparation as Needed
The City issued an intermediate qualification based solicitation (IQBS) for the work on March 24, 2014 to five
firms on the City's Qualified Roster:
•WHPacific
•CESNW
•Pace Engineers
•Otak
•Murray Smith and Associates
The proposals were due on April 8, 2014 and the city received proposals from two firms: WHPacific and
Otak. Staff scored them in accordance with the criteria set forth in the IQBS in order to determine the most
qualified firm. Staff determined that WHPacific was the most qualified and entered into negotiations with
them. Staff entered the negotiations and the agreed upon total for the work is $160,000. As this is inline with
staff's estimate for the work, staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract to
WHPacific in this amount.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The Local Contract Review Board could reject the award recommendation and direct staff to reissue the IQBS.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The Local Contract Review Board discussed this contract at their April 15th workshop.
Fiscal Impact
Cost: $160,000
Budgeted (yes or no): Yes
Where budgeted?: City Gas Tax,TIF,others
Additional Fiscal Notes:
The total cost of this contract is $160,000 and is appropriated in FY 2013-2014 in the City Gas Tax, Gas
Tax,TIF,and other funds. Appropriations for FY 2014-2015 are in the proposed budget.
Attachments
No file(s)attached.
•
AIS-1699 7,
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: Contract Award - 72nd/Dartmouth Intersection Improvements
Prepared For: Joseph Barrett
Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Financial and Information Services
Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Local
Contract
Review
Board
Public Hearing No
Newspaper Legal Ad Required?:
Public Hearing Publication
Date in Newspaper:
Information
ISSUE
Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for construction of the 72nd/Dartmouth
Intersection Improvements project to Kerr Contractors in the amount of$1,552,946 and authorize the City
Manager to take the necessary steps to execute the contract.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for construction of the
72nd/Dartmouth Intersection Improvements project to Kerr Contractors in the amount of$1,552,946.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Work to be done under this contract consists of the following on SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth
Street Section in Washington County:
•Construction of retaining walls.
•Construction of stormwater and water quality facilities.
•Performance of earthwork.
•Construction of curbs, sidewalks,reinforced concrete paving, and HMAC paving.
•Installation of striping and legends.
•Installation of permanent signing.
•Installation of illumination system.
•Installation of landscaping and irrigation systems.
•Underground utilities work.
•Performance of additional and incidental Work as called for by the Specifications and Plans.
The City issued an Invitation to Bid for the work on April 2, 2014 with a closing date of April 16th. The city
received bids from six firms:
•Kerr Contractors - $1,552,946
•Pacific Excavation - $1,787,692
•Phaze Concrete - $1,789,352
•Goodfellows Bros. - $1,849,165
•Canby Excavating- $1,977,633
•3 Kings Environmental - $1,944,569
The engineers estimate for the work was $1,610,382. Staff reviewed the received bids for compliance with the
Invitation to Bid packet has and determined that Kerr Contractors submitted the lowest responsible bid. As
such, staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract to Kerr Contractors in the
amount of$1,552,946.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The Local Contract Review Board may decide to not award this contract and direct staff to conduct a new
solicitation.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The Local Contract Review Board discussed this contract at their April 22nd study session.
Fiscal Impact
Cost: $1,552,946
Budgeted (yes or no): Yes
Where budgeted?: City Gas Tax, Gas Tax,TIF,others
Additional Fiscal Notes:
The total amount of this contract is $1,552,946. The project is currently budgeted in the City Gas Tax, Gas
Tax, TIF,and other miscellaneous funds and staff has requested appropriation in FY 2014-2015's proposed
budget.
Attachments
No file(s)attached
AIS-1709 8.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: Alarm Systems Ordinance TMC 11.08
Prepared For: Alan Orr,Police Submitted By: Julia Jewett, Police
Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting
- Main
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Staff recommends revisions to the Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems Ordinance (TMC 11.08) to clarify
procedures and definitions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends that Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems Ordinance (TMC 11.08) be revised with current
language and definitions.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
Staff recommends the following revisions to Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems Ordinance (TMC 11.08):
Title changed from "Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems" to "Alarm Systems"
Updated language and additional definitions
Addition of Enhanced Call Verification
Definition: All alarm businesses monitoring burglar alarm systems located within the City of Tigard, prior to
making a police alarm dispatch request will attempt a verification call to the alarmed premises and if no
responsible party is located on the initial verification call,attempt a second verification call to another number
designated by the alarm user.
Addition of Protection Sweep
Definition: Any person who obtains or renews an alarm permit after the date of enactment of this section will
be provided with a form requesting consent for the police to enter and perform a protective sweep of any
building or residence where an alarm is activated, the building or residence is unsecured or shows sign of
forcible entry, and no responsible person is immediately available to give or refuse consent to enter. The alarm
coordinator shall notify the Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency (WCCCA) of all
properties where the owner does not grant consent under this section,and shall request that WCCCA put a
flag on the property notifying responding officers of the lack of consent.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Staff reviewed the proposed changes to the ordinance with council during council's study session on April 22,
2014.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
N/A
Attachments
Ordinance
TMC 11.08 Exhibit A
TMC 11.08 Revised
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
Chapter 11.08 ALARM SYSTEMS. which police may respond. This definition does not include
car,medical or fire alarms.
Sections:
11.08.000 Title. 4. "Alarm user" means a person, firm, partnership,
11.08.010 Purpose. association, corporation, company, or organization of any
11.08.020 Definitions. kind in control of any building, structure, or facility within
11.08.030 Alarm Permit Required. the City of Tigard in which an alarm system is used.
11.08.040 Emergency Notification.
11.08.050 Protective Sweep. 5. "Automatic dialing device" means a device
11.08.060 Nuisance Alarms. connected to a telephone line or internet connection
11.08.070 Delinquent Application. programmed to select a predetermined telephone number or
11.08.080 Governmental Unit. intemet location (URL address) and transmit by voice
11.08.090 User Instructions Required. message or code signal an emergency message indicating a
11.08.100 Auto Dialing Devices. need for emergency response.
11.08.110 Enhanced Call Verification.
11.08.120 Equipment Standard. 6. "Chief' means the City of Tigard Chief of Police,
11.08.130 Government Immunity. or designee.
11.08.140 False Alarm Fees.
11.08.150 Penalties. 7. "City"means the City of Tigard.
11.08.160 Alarm Permit Revoked.
11.08.170 Confidentiality. 8. "Coordinator" means the individual designated by
11.08.180 Interpretation. the chief to issue alarm permits and enforce the provisions
11.08.190 Senior Citizen Exemption. of this chapter.
11.08.200 Allocation of Revenues.
9. "Current alarm permit"means an alarm permit that
11.08.000 Title. is not expired or revoked,and does not have any outstanding
fees,fines or penalties.
This ordinance shall be known as the "alarm
ordinance"for the City of Tigard. 10. "Dispatch center"means the facility used to receive
emergency and general information from the public.
11.08.010 Purpose.
11. "False alarm" means an alarm signal, capable of
The purpose of this chapter is to encourage alarm eliciting a response by police when a situation requiring a
users and alarm businesses to assume increased responsibility response by the police does not in fact exist. An alarm is not
for maintaining the mechanical reliability and the proper use considered false if there are signs of forced or attempted
of alarm systems to prevent unnecessary police emergency entry; natural circumstances (heavy wind); notification from
responses to false alarms and thereby protect the emergency the alarm company that the system is faulty before an officer
response capability of the city from misuse. arrives on the scene; notification from the user that the
system or the user erred before an officer arrives on the
11.08.020 Definitions. scene; or if a neighbor comes forward to indicate their
observance of suspicious activity when no apparent entry or
1. "Alarm business" means the business by any attempted entry can be determined otherwise.
individual, partnership, corporation, or other entity, of
selling, leasing, maintaining, servicing, repairing, altering, 12. "Interconnect" means to connect an alarm system
replacing,moving,or installing any alarm system in or on any including an automatic dialing device, to a telephone line or
building, structure, or facility. Alarm businesses include any computer network connection either directly or through a
person, business, or organization that monitors alarm mechanical device that utilizes a telephone or computer to
systems and initiates alarm dispatch requests. transmit a message upon the activation of the alarm system.
2. "Alarm dispatch" means the initiation of a 13. "Monitoring center"means a facility used to receive
communication to dispatch, by an alarm business indicating emergency and general information from an alarm user and
an alarm has been activated, and requesting police response to direct an emergency response.
to the alarm site. 14. "Primary trunk line"means a telephone line serving
the police dispatch center that is designated to receive police
3. "Alarm system" means any assembly of equipment, calls
mechanical or electrical,arranged to signal the occurrence of
an illegal entry or other activity requiring urgent attention to 15. "Permit"means an alarm permit,issued by the City
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
of Tigard. abate such nuisances by disabling the alarm.
16. "Permit renewal" means applying for a new permit The police officer must use the least destructive
to replace an expired permit, where the alarm system is method available to disable the alarm, and shall provide
designed and used for substantially the same building, facility notice to the homeowner of the time and reason the alarm
or structure. was disabled. The notice may be posted upon the main
entrance of the residence or business.
11.08.030 Alarm Permit Required.
If the police officer forced entry into a building or
Every alarm user shall obtain an alarm permit for residence to disable an alarm, prior to leaving, the police
their alarm system from the coordinator's office upon the officer will take responsible steps to secure the business or
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter or residence from further entry or damage,unless the owner or
prior to use of an alarm system. other responsible person is present on the scene prior to the
departure of the officer.
An application for a permit shall be filed annually
with the coordinator's office, required by the chief. Each 11.08.070 Delinquent Application.
permit shall bear the signature of the chief and shall be valid
for a one-year period. The fees and fine of alarm permits are A late charge will be added to the permit fee of an
included in the City of Tigard Fees and Charges Schedule. alarm user who fails to obtain a permit within 60 days or by
an alarm user who fails to renew a permit within 60 days
The permit shall be physically placed upon the after a permit has expired.
premises using the alarm system, placed near the main
entrance to be visible to responding police officers. A 11.08.080 Governmental Unit.
separate alarm permit is required for each alarm site.
A governmental unit alarm user shall be subject to
11.08.040 Emergency Notification. this chapter, but a permit shall be issued without a fee and
shall not be subject to revocation, additional fees, fines or
The alarm registration shall be in a form prescribed penalties.
by the chief, and shall include the name, address and
telephone number(s) of invidual(s) authorized by the alarm 11.08.090 User Instructions Required.
user to act on their behalf in case of emergencies,alarms and
false alarms. Any alarm business selling,leasing,or furnishing an
alarm system installed in the City of Tigard shall provide the
11.08.050 Protective Sweep. alarm user with operating instructions for the alarm system,
shall notify the alarm user of the alarm permit requirement,
Any person who obtains or renews an alarm permit and provide an alarm permit application and a fee schedule.
after the date of enactment of this section will be provided
with a form requesting consent for the police to enter and The alarm business shall maintain records
perform a protective sweep of any building or residence demonstrating compliance with this section, and provide
where an alarm is activated, the building or residence is documentation to the chief's office upon request. Calls for
unsecured or shows signs of forcible entry, and no emergency response to alarm event by an alarm business
responsible person is immediately available to give or refuse must include the corresponding alarm permit number.
consent to enter.
11.08.100Auto Dialing Devices.
The alarm coordinator shall notify dispatch of all
properties where the owner does not grant consent under It is unlawful for any person to program an
this section, and shall request that dispatch flag the property automatic dialing device to select a primary trunk line or any
to notify responding officers of the lack of consent. 9-1-1 prefix requiring police response; and it is unlawful for
an alarm user to fail to disconnect or reprogram an automatic
11.08.060 Nuisance Alarms. dialing device programmed to select a primary trunk line
within twelve hours of receipt of written notice from the
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a Tigard Police Department that it is so programmed.
police officer responding to an alarm may disable the alarm
when no responsible person is readily available to silence the 11.08.110 Enhanced Call Verification.
alarm and the alarm is disturbing the peace, health or repose
of the neighbors. Such alarms are deemed public nuisances, All alarm businesses monitoring alarm systems in
and police officers are hereby authorized to immediately the City of Tigard, will attempt a verification call to the
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
alarmed premise and if no responsible party is located on the of receipt to the notice describing the actions to be taken to
initial verification call,a second verification call will be made eliminate the cause of the false alarms.
prior to the alarm business requesting a police alarm dispatch
request. Failure to pay a renewal fee, false alarm fee,or fine
within ninety days shall result in revocation of the alarm
11.08.120Equipment Standard. permit until all fees are paid. The alarm user shall be notified
by mail that no further law enforcement response to alarms
Alarm businesses installing alarm systems in the at that property will be forthcoming. The alarm user shall
City of Tigard shall use alarm control panels that meet SLi have fourteen days from the date of the revocation notice to
Control Panel Standard CP-Ol. Alarm businesses will make payment arrangements with the chief's office. If fees
maintain records demonstrating compliance with this remain unpaid and no payment arrangement is made at the
section, and provide documentation to the chief's office expiration of fourteen days after the date of the revocation
upon request. notice, the chief's office shall notify dispatch of the
revocation and shall request that dispatch flag the property
11.08.130Govennment Immunity. for non-response on any additional alarms generated at the
property until the permit is reinstated.
Alarm registration does not create a contract, duty,
or obligation,either expressed or implied, of response to an If more than six false alarms are generated within a
alarm. All liability and consequential damage resulting from twelve-month period,the alarm coordinator may revoke the
the failure to respond to a notification is hereby disclaimed alarm permit for a period of not more than one year. This
and governmental immunity as provided by law is retained. revocation shall be in addition to and separate from any false
alarm fines. The alarm user shall be notified by mail of the
revocation and the fact that no further police response will
The alarm user acknowledges that law enforcement be forthcoming for alarms generated at the property. The
response may be influenced by factors such as availability of alarm user will have fourteen days from the date of the
police units, priority of calls, weather conditions, traffic revocation notice to petition the chief's office for
conditions, emergency conditions, staffing levels, and prior reconsideration. Requests to reconsider a revocation under
response history. this section will be considered if all fees, fines and penalties
are current and a written plan to resolve false alarms is
11.08.130False Alarm Fees. submitted.
An alarm user incurring a false alarm shall be If no petition for reconsideration is made or if the
subject to a fee established by the chief. The user shall be chief denies the petition, the chief's office shall notify the
notified by mail of a false alarm occurrence and payment alarm user and dispatch of the revocation. The property will
shall be made to the alarm coordinator within thirty days of be flagged for nonresponse on any additional alarms
receipt of the notice. generated at the property,until the alarm permit is reinstated.
Any alarm user who has had their alarm permit revoked shall
At the chief's discretion, the coordinator shall pay a reinstatement fee. No alarm permit may be reinstated
notify the alarm user of excessive false alarms and direct the until all outstanding fees,fines or penalties are paid in full.
user to submit a report within ten days of the notice
describing actions to be taken to eliminate the cause of false 1L08.160Alarm Permit Revoked.
alarms. Failure to submit a report as directed shall be
grounds for revocation of the alarm permit. It is unlawful to generate additional false alarms on
a permit that has been revoked and not reinstated. Any
11.08.150Penalties. alarm user who has had their alarm permit revoked shall take
steps to disable the alarm or otherwise configure the alarm
Alarm users incurring three or more false alarms system so it does not generate additional false alarms.
within a permit year shall be subject to a fine_ The user will
be notified by mail of the fine,and payment shall be made to Notwithstanding the fact that police response has
the alarm coordinator within thirty days of receipt of the been discontinued due to revocation, generating additional
notice. false alarms,after an alarm permit has been revoked and not
reinstated, constitutes a violation of this Code and is
Additional penalties will be charged to a user that is punishable by a fine.
more than sixty days delinquent in paying false alarm fees,
fines or penalties. At the chief's discretion, the alarm 11.08.170Confidentiality.
coordinator shall notify the alarm user of excessive false
alarms and direct the user to submit a report within ten days All information supplied on an alarm permit
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
application is recognized as personally confidential and will
be withheld from disclosure under public records law to the
extent allowable under the law.
11.08.180 Interpreta tion.
This chapter shall be liberally construed to affect
the purpose of the ordinance codified and to achieve
uniform interpretation and application of the respective
ordinances.
11.08.190Senior Citizen Exemption.
If a residential alarm user is over the age of sixty,or
physically handicapped, and is the primary resident of the
residence and no business is conducted in the residence, a
permit may be obtained without the payment of a fee.
11.08.200 Allocation of Revenues.
All penalties collected pursuant to this chapter shall
be deposited to the city general fund.
AIS-1751 9,
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes
Agenda Title: Adopt Ordinance adopting TVF&R Fire Code Ordinance No. 14-01
Submitted By: Mark VanDomelen,Community
Development
Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting
- Main
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
—
Information
ISSUE
Shall the Tigard City Council adopt an ordinance adopting Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue (TVF&R) Ordinance
No. 14-01, thus adopting the most recent edition of the Oregon Fire Code and allowing TVF&R to provide
fire prevention and firefighting services for the City of Tigard.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends adopting the City of Tigard Ordinance adopting TVF&R ordinance 14-01 and the Oregon
Fire Code.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Building Division enforces the State Specialty Codes in the City of Tigard as identified in Chapter 14.04
of the Tigard Municipal Code. Under authority of ORS 455.150,the City administers the Specialty Codes
(structural,plumbing,electrical,mechanical,and residential) as adopted by the State of Oregon.
Fire prevention and firefighting services are provided to the City of Tigard by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
(TVF&R). Oregon law,under ORS 478.924,requires local fire districts to adopt the Oregon Fire Code by
local ordinance. This allows the fire district to review appeals to code rulings and issue interpretations at the
local level.
The City of Tigard Building Division works in partnership with TVF&R by reviewing plans and performing
inspections to ensure all new construction complies with the requirements of the most recently adopted
Oregon Fire Code. TVF&R provides a liaison to work with the Current Planning Division to review land use
development cases and assist the Building Division with Fire Code requirements.
TVF&R has adopted the most recent Oregon Fire Code through TVF&R ordinance No. 14-01. Tigard has
historically adopted TVF&R's ordinance with a City of Tigard Ordinance. The most recent City of Tigard
ordinance No. 10-14,which adopted the 2010 Oregon Fire Code,would be repealed with the adoption of the
new ordinance.
Attachment 3 is a Q&A document provided by TVF&R regarding the above requirements.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives under the current City agreement with TVF&R.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
N/A
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
October 23,2007;September 28,2010
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Information:
N/A
Attachments
Ordinance
Exhibit A
TV'F&R Fire Code Ordinance 14-01 Q&A
Fire Code Ordinance 14-01 Q&A
0: If the State of Oregon already adopts the 2014 Oregon Fire Code, why do cities and counties served by
TVF&R need to pass a resolution approving this TVF&R Ordinance?
A: ORS 478.910 requires a fire district board to adopt their fire prevention code in accordance with ORS 198.510
to 198.600. Following adoption by TVF&R's Board, ORS 478.924 further mandates that any city or county
within the district must also approve the fire code by resolution. If not adopted in a city or county, a legal
uncertainty would exist about which agency has jurisdiction over fire code enforcement, plan review services,
application of local amendments, appeals board proceedings, and more.
Q: Why did TVF&R adopt a new fire code ordinance? What's wrong with the existing one?
A: Nothing is wrong, per se, with our current fire code ordinance. The International Code Council develops and
publishes a new edition of the International Fire Code every three years, which is subsequently adopted by
the Oregon Office of State Fire Marshal. In order for TVF&R to maintain exempt fire district status with the
State of Oregon, we are required by OAR 837-039-0015 to adopt regulations that are consistent with minimum
state fire code standards. This is nearly identical to the process by which the state adopts other construction
codes, such as building, mechanical, plumbing, etc.
0: What is "Exempt Status?"
A: TVF&R is an Exempt Jurisdiction per OAR 837, Division 39, meaning that, in the opinion of the State Fire
Marshal, we have enacted adequate regulations generally conforming to state and national standards
concerning fire prevention, fire safety measures, and building construction requirements for safety. We also
provide reasonable enforcement of those regulations.
Exempt status allows TVF&R to maintain local control and local delivery of all services related to fire code
compliance within our Fire District, including required input on construction plans, providing fire code
enforcement and assistance, fire safety inspections of commercial buildings, and more. If TVF&R were not an
Exempt Jurisdiction, the State Fire Marshal's Office, headquartered in Salem, would have jurisdiction over fire
code enforcement. We believe that fire code services are best delivered at the local level, where TVF&R is
able to provide the highest degree of customer service to our local government partners, residents, and
business community.
Q: Why does TVF&R have local amendments to the Fire Code?
A: State law allows local fire districts to modify the fire code as deemed appropriate. There is only amendment in
this Ordinance, targeting the significant problem of false automatic alarms in our region. Historically, nearly 1
in 10 emergency calls are false alarms dispatched by automatic alarm systems primarily at commercial
occupancies - resulting in a huge cost to our taxpayers. False alarms take emergency crews out of service,
so they are unavailable for true emergencies, and responding to thousands of false alarms puts emergency
apparatus on the road unnecessarily, adding risk to both responders and the public.
The amendment of the fire code requires that alarm monitoring companies attempt to verify the accuracy of
alarms in commercial buildings prior to retransmitting to 911 centers, a precaution already taken in household
alarm systems for nearly 20 years. This has no impact on the design or construction of buildings — it only
impacts how alarm signals are handled by the offsite alarm monitoring companies. This is simply a
continuation of a requirement placed in the last ordinance that has helped reduce false alarms by
approximately 30%.
AIS-1762 10.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes
Agenda Title: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Westside Trail Master Plan and Adding that Plan to
the Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan
Prepared For: Brian Rager,Public Works Submitted By: Greer Gaston, Public
Works
Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting
- Main
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Shall council adopt a resolution approving the Westside Trail Master Plan and adding that plan to the Tigard
Greenways Trail System Master Plan?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends the council adopt the resolution.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The council was briefed on the Westside Trail Master Plan at its April 15, 2014,workshop meeting.
At its April 22,2014, meeting, staff presented council with a resolution to adopt the plan,but council raised
concerns related to public acceptance of the plan. In particular, council was concerned that representatives of
CPO-4B did not support the plan,based upon comments made at a recent River Terrace stakeholders
working group meeting. Metro and city staff have since corresponded with CPO-4B representatives who
assured staff that they are in full support of the Westside Trail Master Plan. Any concern they have with
specific improvements through River Terrace will be handled within the confines of the River Terrace
community and infrastructure planning processes.
The Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan was completed in 2011. The plan did not include the
Westside Trail,because at the time Metro had started multi-jurisdictional planning for that trail.
The goal of the Westside Trail Master Plan is to recommend a comprehensive strategy for the completion of a
25-mile north-south trail from Forest Park to the Tualatin River. Project objectives include engaging project
stakeholders, identifying a final trail alignment, and producing construction cost estimates. The master plan
provides direction as local and regional partners embark on efforts to fund, design and build the trail.
The project started in January 2012,and its $334,000 budget comes from a Regional Flexible Funds grant
from Metro,and matching funds provided by the City of Tigard and Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation
District (THPRD). A Stakeholder Advisory Committee made up of 14 members representing neighborhood
groups and local agency staff met six times to review project deliverables and give feedback to staff.
The trail has garnered strong support from project partners including the cities of King City,Tualatin,Tigard,
and Portland; Multnomah and Washington Counties; Bonneville Power Administration and Portland General
Electric;THPRD;and Metro. Public input and the participation of local community organizations has been a
strong influence on refining and adapting the trail alignments and options illustrated in the master plan. The
project team engaged stakeholders and the public at 60 events over the course of 27 months. The project team
directly engaged approximately 1,400 people at these events, and also distributed 18,000 postcards and
received over 200 completed surveys.
The draft Westside Trail Master Plan was available for public comment from February 6 to February 28, 2014.
From April 8 to April 22 the plan was presented to local boards and councils for their formal consideration.
Metro is seeking a resolution from the Tigard City Council approving the plan.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
The council could propose changes to the plan or could elect not to approve the plan.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
The Westside Trail Master Plan will be added to the Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan.
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The council was briefed on the Westside Trail Master Plan at its April 15,2014, workshop meeting.
At its April 22, 2014, meeting, staff presented council with a resolution to adopt the plan,but council raised
concerns related to public acceptance of the plan. In particular, council was concerned that representatives of
CPO-4B did not support the plan. Metro and city staff have since corresponded with CPO-4B representatives
who assured staff that they are in full support of the Westside Trail Master Plan.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Information:
Approval of the Westside Trail Master Plan has no direct fiscal impact.
Attachments
Resolution
Exhibit A to Resolution-Westside Trail Master Plan
•
AIS-1742 11.
Business Meeting
Meeting Date: 05/13/2014
Length (in minutes):20 Minutes
Agenda Title: Update for Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan
Submitted By: Cheryl Caines,Community
Development
Item Type: Update, Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting
- Main
Public Hearing: No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
City Council will hear an update on the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
No action necessary- update only.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Triangle project team has recently completed Task 4 (Options Development). Two land use and
infrastructure options were developed utilizing information gathered during previous tasks. This information
included issues raised by citizen and technical committee members and the public - such as traffic congestion,
lack of sidewalks,need for affordable housing options,lack of amenities (parks,open space,restaurant/service
retail uses), and protection of natural resources. The draft plan options addressed these issues by showing a
mix of uses—including housing at different densities, opportunities for parks and open space, and new
street/pathway connections for cars,bikes and pedestrians.
A brief description of the two plan options is found below. Full descriptions can be found in the attached
report and maps.
Description of Options
Option 1 proposes few changes to densities or uses. Multi-family is permitted at 30 units per acre—similar to
the 25 units per acre currently allowed.Areas west of SW 72nd Avenue retain commercial uses with residential
focused mostly east of SW 72nd. A few new street connections are proposed. A more complete pedestrian
connection network within development is proposed in areas east of SW 72nd Avenue. Active residential or
commercial ground floor uses would be limited to corners and high traffic streets such as 68th and 69th.
Option 2 proposes increased densities of 50 dwelling units per acre. Housing is focused within the center of
the Triangle along both sides of SW 72nd Avenue. Building heights are increased to accommodate 5-6 story
buildings. A more extensive street and pedestrian network is proposed on both sides of SW 72nd Avenue with
a new north-south street (SW 74th Avenue) that connects to a new crossing of Highway 217 at Beveland
Street.
Both options propose:
• a pedestrian district along SW 68th, 69th and 70th Avenues
• eliminating auto-oriented uses (such as drive-throughs, and gas stations)
• modifying design standards to improve the pedestrian experience along streets
• increasing maximum floor area ratios that currently limit the amount of building square footage within a
development
• identifying opportunities for parks and open space with a trail along Red Rock Creek
Initial Feedback on Options
The options have been presented to both the citizen (CAC) and technical (TAC) advisory committees. Initial
feedback from the CAC indicated a preference for Option 2. Discussion topics included parking, building
heights,parks/plazas,improvements to highway connections, and impacts on existing development/property
owners. The TAC did not indicate an early preference,nor did they express any concern, over increased
density. Questions and comments centered on stormwater, parks, congestion at intersections and along Pacific
Highway, and pedestrian/bicycle connections across highways. There was also discussion at both meetings
about SW Corridor and the passage of Measure 34-210. Because the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan is an
economic development plan,it will proceed with or without high capacity transit. However, coordination
between the projects is still important, and the SW Corridor plan will be informed by the Triangle plan.
Next Steps
In task 5, the project team will evaluate how well the options address the project objectives (Getting Around,
Livability/Vitality,Community Character and Market Fundamentals).Analysis will be done for different
development types with various densities,building heights,parking ratios,and floor area ratios to see which
parameters pencil out for the Triangle.The cost of public infrastructure upgrades will be estimated. This
information will then be presented to the advisory committees and public for final feedback before the
Triangle Team makes a recommendation on a preferred plan.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Not applicable.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Council Goal 3:Tigard Triangle
Complete Triangle Strategic Plan
• Adopt zoning, street and design standards
• Begin implementing plan strategies
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Previous updates occurred on September 3,2013 and December 17,2013.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Information:
No information is available at this time. Cost estimates for public infrastructure will be developed during the next project task.
Attachments
Options Comparison Table
Option l Maps
Option 2 Maps
Powerpoint-Triangle Update 5-13-14
Comparison of Existing Zoning and Site Design Standards with Land Use Options
Existing Zoning Land Use Option 1 Land Use Option 2
Residential Density 25 du/acre 30 du/acre 50 du/acre
Maximum Building Heights 45 feet 45 feet 75 feet
Maximum Floor Area Ratio .40:1 1.5:1 3:1
Setbacks 0-10 feet 0-10 feet 0-10 feet
Ground Floor Retail/Flex NA Limited to corners within pedestrian district. Option 2
space would also include ground floor retail/flex space
along the new 74th connection
Minimum Street Frontage
"A Streets" Requires 50% 90% 90%
"B Streets" minimum on 20% 20%
arterials and
collectors
Pedestrian/Vehicle Access Ped. Connections no Pedestrian access spaced not closer than 200 ft., but
more than 330 ft. not greater than 300 ft. Can be coupled with vehicle
Vehicle connections access.
no more than 660 ft.
Parking
Residential 1-1.75 per DU
General Commercial 3.0/ 1,000 sq ft
To be determined To be determined
Office 2.7 spaces/1,000
3.9 for med/dental
Ti g and Triangle
STRATEGIC PLAN
Option 1
Bike and Pedestrian Network
Option I provides recreational oppenunitk.and natural areas to support •°
and revitalize natural resources in the area by: . 8r
e
•Improving Red Rock(reek as both a natural and recreanonel amenity - ■ w •
•A paved multi-use nail connects natural natures to the larger bicycle and -'.rain
i pedestrian network - oe — `
•lbenulti-use tradwuuld also link to the trad system near the tut urewal-Atari - / t
•Two other parIts:plata spaces would be located in the central and southern - +
pans of theLiengle to take advantage of existing trees and vegetation.These I 3
park areas would be designed to serve local employees and residents. , A••On longer bkscks.pedestrian paths are proposed that provide connections i
through blocks and provide access to parking behind buildings.Pedestrian
access can also he coupled with vehicle access rf necessary.
•All streets are pedestrian-oriented.each at least 11 toot sidewalks and ' — % — - - _.--
onhsneet parking provded. I ' f �•`4
•Designated bike lanes are provided along highei.traftc streets,which also I �r
i connect to the!dryer system outsideof the Triaoyle,rndudrng connection _. . �1 it
across Oil95W,across 1-5 on Haines Street.and across OR 217 on a new / I --'Y
Hunziker Road crossing
•Shared travel lanes ale provided along local streets where slower vehicle �'
speeds are expected. , I 7� f.
•In some cares where typography i s more c alien grng,uphill hike lanes may be / ` '\
• provided to mnr0*e conflicts with vehicles. ■ \
/ R \
` •
- - aw A
•
JMT-.•. - •' •\.ist44410, 00.....
5 1 1
I
, 4 . 1 1 " i i I ,. .
.. 1
,.,.,.....,: , .
—
j—•— s` d j r
\ 1\1(
1 –"=
• I
J.en IFutureWal-Mart —...'.«— —
'development // ; 1 1 m
Within the
C If
J �� 1 pede nary
drsokc access to
J I - — •.ukl sr. -- till-street parking
•jJJI I I I areas will belesnkred "1
f - 1 1 along 6&h,69th,and
1( =�'— _ I 70th Avenues,with
I
I i access provided along
i - a x eastrwest cross streets
C focusing parking
�i r�". access reduces
is i'� -- -. — >•+ I conncts with
ij pede.tran•.
•
■
I i
LEGEND '�+YJ :Y r
Existing features 111,,
y
0.Freeways
Roads and streets'
tttttttt� Designated bike lane sw liti\•.—•— Shared lane sw canternewsr iiikk I -
M Regional and local trails
■
Propostd Improvements.
Peclestnan District se vAR.ra sr
iiii•
Planned designated hike lane e, •. ,
— Shared lane a •�
——— off-street muhhuse grad i•
w■■ Pedestrian n
pathway
Highway crossing aware sr sw FA sir '' 1' f•:
r C 1/4-mile radius walkable area _ 11
=—• Improved pedestrian crossing k sk'Fa+wa
— identfiedinTigard99WImprovement
and Management Plan
Proposed Roadway t
- 9w 4rEarr,Da I
.� 555 SA/K6uNt 5 T
.4 I 4 I N4 1 4.''.'' , )1 1 I 1 1 11114- ,
,1 O 300 600 r N
1 1 r I r i I Feet
I IkiAIR 1, K„r t,y.a IF
r enK,re Man la>t,irr Sur/4Gr Ceara*.Pm
I • •
Tigard Triangle
ETRATE6i.
Option 1
I Primar Land Use Functions
°pixx I generally maintains the existing densities allowed In the MUE zuwe, R .-• a;
' district,and no changes to permitted uses are proposed except for rest ikIrons fs SW v>.ve ST f.
on auto-oriented uses such as drive-throughs,gas stations and other uses that II
are not pedestrian oriented.bunting densities within the Triangle,a developed e! j
to the maximum extent possible,are adequate to provide a transit and f
I. pedestrian oriented environment,but the existing design requirements limn
development potential even under current density standards Changes to design swzwauccsr -
standards would manmee the development potential without requiring
significant changes in the tlevelopment code Key xo.epwrnn of Option t '
include
•Generally maintaining ea Ming land use densities: /faar)
-Mulraamrly residential densities would be 30 ewntiry units per acre
• Multilamily resesentral uses are permitted in all areas /..
-Vwlica/rowed-use bulking;liround/loot raoltxwe used would*ntp -
be looted on turners or in the pedestrian district where there is high
vnibility.although the predomnant land use pattern within the Triangle •
•
would hkeaa'be horizontal rated us. as apartments or office
buildings. '
•Gera•ral rorenenclal office,and institutional uses would be dmear to
. ( .
what exists today.
-Commercial areas not wnhn designated general commensal acmes 1(-01
are limited to a 3ogpo square foot(to)maximum flow plat.The ) `
I
provides for some larger uses.such as a gr«cry store.but not large I' \
format retail,such as Wal-Mart or Cmi W. Z
2
i `r I.
•
c[ r9W eA ta,fl sr
1 I L S
\ \411k: .� / %: - .e •
e 4_ ,
•. -- filitit if,
aw JOUdcaa pa
�—• li
,, ..-F-J \ SW pxmr lt17 a1
SW! Iryt,MST
—Ni,. / sw,,,,,,..4. /4,t
•./,. I' •' fik./''... /—.1 —
r SWOOH7AGA ST/
S TH /..111 . ,
al
„„„\..,.
•
•
•
ma y% �.
_ a
LEGEND SW
Existing features
Freeways
s:vcatsrv�Fw ST
Roads and streets'
Primary Land Use Functions -•t -- ,..ar YARNS Sr ) .r+✓se oAns pcen .
General Commercial �r -�
Residential -•"
■ coop/Employment >°
A.
s. Campus and Education
I ♦ open Space
SW rrrtsr Sw Tiro st
I) /��/II//j/ Ground floor him space/act ere t1Se
Proposed roadway SW'Mf[Oqa
IIIMO Highway Cnossng E
2
0 300 boo
N I , r l m r I0 s0C.•Eepet,e
Aar tANO9yn4 S r
III • rFue,o',penned i �,
in ngl arrant
Trrangie von awKi S W rFGrf GBNrFe o•
Tigard Triangle Option 1
Of en S ace and Natural Areas
A g
Rd . .• .,
4•174.,E Sr .__� S�
SW YYRUCf Sr
I
I a
1 I
I ., 0)
=1■4174S
4 Y hhh
i i = 4
A
SW Ff4/7./.S'
1 1
\,„,,,,„,,,...i,:,,,, „,....ii, , • r:!: I ' U'
\I . t
a -.
11,4
•••r j
WcureWaFMart j I \'_y
development
I
' I saifaaasrsz.I .—.. ._
\ l 1
• Ii �r 'sYt`s __ I
Zitesititi4441414444tti, .
I �\ _ ""tea •**** -...
\ j I
t I
j I 1 I
f I I I A
i,r. 3
b',FAS:a YT
LEGEND
lilit
•
Existing(failures sw'cwES>weW S.
1 ■ Freeways
Roads and streets'
Designated bike lane sW tutus s,
- .•—•— Shared lane -
Regional and local trails 4 f '
Key features
h
Plaza,,park swfw s! so, fil3
O Greenway corridor rwese
r
—..m.— multi use[rail;Pedestnan pathway 1
Mill Proposed roadway
5w G.,[Eigr /
'11411\lii. 41i N l . , I c , l Feet
I •rust,of aaon.n I
n.c one.*T,vra
Tow,*Mr PxM� __ Sir FEU l6V141t BR l •
N
Tigard Triangle
STRATEGIC PLAN Option 1
Roadwa Network
1 1
Al
t
sky maw i
Ye/
or
,.-
F i f•
I r •-- a
3
�F
0 NIT 6 ...
,..
I" _
11 ti
.. z
..
i .
J
, I_ 1
?--J • r
development
i Z t
•
P 7..._._ \ ••......••
\ .1.,........„,„,„,
/ \
--; 4--:.' , , ,,
livw.F._ .
�\ smallness s,
F
I a
ISA'PAPA.l a tit
• SWCRES7WCWSJ A
k LEGEND
Existing features
SW WIRNS S1 ii.cE ow,s e.r
Freeways
Roads and streets'
F
Proposed Improvements
- MS=Local Street(assume 60'00W) sw Fm sr -
Inn
Highway crossing sw na s r
,WHAL 1
0 300 600 4 1
N I i I I l i I Feel .5W CHOW,oft ti
J
sw�
SI
•(using a awn, ` I
in m:rumen Twee 0 1
Trwgk Pbn QN.i[i SW TM/CENTER OR
TigardTTriangle
Option 2
Bike and Pedestrian Network
The parks and walk rytusn ender Option 7 Is similar to what is proposed 1 }}� - ,•
•nite Option y Option i i I RM!}_- '
•Expands the iMi todat owldation system. L-
•sxiudes an fr ukhvodal connection across OR 217,miser ar Revesland ROAM � • •A•••
1. Hanpeon Sheet and connects to the bicycle syuem across 14 on I'. >7 -..
SW Haines Street. asaaaarw,i:asiR�R* - __ pp ii•A paved multiuse trail connects natural features to the larger hrcycle and e_ra i
pedestrian network. ��,�.wnene,
•The multi-use trail would also knk to the trail system near the future WaHSiarr. saxes
•Two other parks/plaza spaces could be located in the central and southern 3
parrs of the Trsrgle to take advantage of emteg trees rd•egetation. •
•In addition,eech of the land use options resumes that some larger
developments would incorporate mid-block pedestrian crossings and plazas. • - - - "
`• ,
•
•AR mats ill*pedlthiarYpiMtltl,with at leas(11 f00t sidewalks and - 06-.'-!!' ,+•T
on•street parking povided. /Z"� •
•Designated bate lanes ale provided along higher•Rathe sweets•which oho
connect to the larger system outside of the triangle,including connections
ia ,
across OR 99W.across I-S on Haines Sheet.and across OR 217 on a new }
elorinker Road crossng Air . II
•Shand travel lanes are provided along local streets wtrere slower whole I' e" •
speeds see expected. I• •■
M•In swne cases rayee typography is more challenging.uphill bike lanes may be , e
ptrvidedto wrndedae canflen Mtii whacks r... 'I•
s4!j I . \ --I:.
IIi 41�
j
\\Sisiii)iliilli ow._ . •
ie 1 1
• WA k - i i
4n4 unk
: I ...i i
. , . ,,
I, „,,,,,,,,ril „ ,„ e i ./' . !
1 \Ili .0 III ... 1 .
x
i t t
fil Ordy one of these OR 217 i \ I i a then tfie access pedeostrun
akgnrttents rronaN be
_ •was. dl-sheet parking
consnucted. - 1 ( jj areas will be anted '
! i along 6Rth,69rh,and
•.. ! ��• cue I.1 —+ r 70th Avenraes.wnh
( I ! access paraded along
1 1` east/west cross streets.
• • r Focusing parking
k --' ii I access/educes
0`�' ---- •�` - cedestr weal,
;!t � pedestrians.
I
LEGEND �.� i ..-,r. a ie
Existing features \ t S
MINI Freeways
• �.
Roads and st reefs'
•ia� Designated bike lane t } '.\ •....
Sri#. f
�•�•— Shared lane L
Regional and local trails sirpsr �i e.
La_ '
Proposed Improvements I ( le •• •1
Pedestrian Distract air vAerus sr ,, a.AU�l MRa
INIRMIMI Designated bike lane S' ! f
--—•— Shared lane E 1 •� .�'-�I
•
Off-street mukwse trail P
I Pedes(rian pathway '
MEMHighway crossing swcatar tT*men �•
1i4-mole radius walkable area jaetaRtO►
•
Proposed roadway ++;;
t 1
0 Jl r>/F m.LMa,tRMeti r `
N 11 s. 1 t i 1 FC•et fi! `
MMlaalOwlwGST IIIII I • .
ia,.rMrn..,,,..+ i �� r
I t. is 1, rig.. lave raex ebrrGe lore it
•
Tigard Triangle
STRATEGIC PAIN Option 2
Primar Land Use Functions
Option 2 increases land use densities horn what is currently allowed in the MUE
zoning district.In addition.some areas that are currently zoned lot general Swap*sr -- –........."'
commercial uses would change ro residentaVmixed use Option:incorporates i
all features of Opnon I Key components of Option 2 irxlude. e
s•Changing some general commercial zoning to residential/mixed meand 1
Increasing land use domain:
I SW SRRUC*sr
Multifamily residential densities would be increased to SO dwelling
units per acre.Multifamily residential uses would be permitted in all Ip
areas. R
•
i., -7- - -- Tr
-Building heights and lot<overage change.which would increase
1
potential density. 1
-Vertkel misted use buildings(ground floor retie/mow uses)works likely t
be located on corners in the pedestrian district and in redeveloped areas .--
that fovea large amount o toe talk and where there is high visibility 1
Venice/and horizontal mixed uses would be interspersed with one I! ,
another more than they would be under Option I.
-General commercial uses,except where they transition to mixed,use land
uses,and race and Institutional uses world be In similar bcatrons as !
today Although changes in site design standards and potentially pad,erg 1r`
requirements would encourage increased lot coverage and potentially
taller buildings.
-Olt•steeet parking cWd be located on-site.either on a surface lot or in a `
struetore. \1
-Commercial areas that arc rot within designated commercial zones
•
would be limited to a 30.000 square foot Ih')maoMnunfloor plate This
provides for some larger uses,but not for large format retail—the same
as under Option I.
'..v '_ 7WA7kANplrf.� _
SM'MUM.ST • 1
//1
SW&MOT4 •
► U 4 I e .
1
SW
GUNTONS i
i.
/// I i(.____
•
,,.... --g � \
h• •
i - sWnexwso eat sweieunsrsr
. ,::
Only one of these OR 217
•
iiii alignments would be - bte
constructed. ,/1 / p 7•-14.11441E0 )11 1 \
\4\•\ar I
5
lthtlaq featuresI i
Freeways 1. swarFU sr
' illic Roads and streets'
li s'e11� /T y
Primary Land Lisa Functions
General Commercial Residential kip MP Residential lisp to 6 stories) SW WRNSr
i Office/Employment(up to 6 stories(
t MOW Campus and Education(up to 6 stories)
- Open Space B y
y////////1 Ground floor Rest space/active use 1
Proposed roadway SW Ft 4T ..
— Highway crossing SWITeetor
aPotential area for central/structured
t parking g
lei
1 ..1 0 300 6010 A
N I i t l i t (Fogy aWtMaRvd4 _ •`\
Ste 5AMaURG sti
1<„lei I? mr_. nun
.N441 I 4,
SIV)e(.'p CGNTFR p{ I I
_J
Tigard Triangle Option 2
Olen Soace and Natural Areas
Q W j ow vrr 'r..r._.�._.
I t I ar
di 4, sr $W dpRUCE sr 1 ' I
•"ONA••
i
I
f
t i
CD
i
aw/'HORN ST I
1,t U
aw i?E've n j /
= i `//
I ) e I
...._._•_ �..trw.ar..ro.raz.� ��
�� I 1
N\
\\ .4 r: a I �wsourNwew..w
i W r
V
of
\ , s",,,,, .AS OR
1
{ O
eltgnmerns would be 1�
s constructed. '-r )
i
4' t swsou r.rwryaa di
._......u......i amb...
±J i
r i
1
•
f $
LEGEND A
t }, -i
Existing features
IM Freeways ;.v cpes,urw s r •
‘ .
Roads and streets' \
r� Designated bike lane
_._._ Shared lane
. ,
Regional and local trails sw°ARNS Sr j , .AbseoAtse..d
Key features
•
Plaza/Pad,
Cveenway corridor a v w F, sT `-I.
Regional trail connection SN RR sr j a -
i ,_■ Multi-use traiRedesInan pathway NINA_ Proposed roadway �MrOOF
A0 300 600 sw CHERRY pv ll
N I s i t 1 t I Feet 11
isw sAweuR:i sr
in r�.rw.rr+Tp.d
Niti,
4
+ Fnp1r Pl.+bun[r Sw TECH CENTER 6. ii
Tigard TTriangle
Option 2
5
Roadwa Network
Q E Si*PINE sr 8
e
SW SP•PUCFST SW SPPUCC St .._.._.-_7. .....- C
. '. 'rir
a sW SPPUCF ST
v 9YW..__.
.s_....__ .. Ilk9RN.._...... •..
r i swarm $, ..
...: . � ST 5 ! r
a .•
,iii'• .._ anti
.
i: I II , ,
i
__ i SW uOVG.4a
Future Wal-Mart
development •
\ r NI I t
4' ■ \ NE: ,
Only one
tm dace OR 117
a
LJ
Ygnmesm would be n
constructed. F
• ilirairim,.' ! SW SOBMwooD OR '
:1: Qko i'if. `�, s►A1�[tr g� i
a
lir I LLT1
mpsT
LEGEND
Existing Natures .
SW VAFHS ST .FUSE OMs a:11,
Freeways — -
IRPM= Roads and streets' V
a
i 72
Proposed Improvements \NI)
■ Bicycle Candor Street(assume 70'ROW I ay sr
local Street(assume 60'ROW I R Gin
f Highway crossing SwFaesoon
�1 S
'
0 300 600
N I s s l s t l Feet se Ci.FFFV Ow \\\
SWS NOSIO,,i_;y
,..N.
Ont.;c•ptwoorel 11.
16 IS*...A?Nwe
lha gle Pl.n tMrrYr SW Me.CENKF d
4
C I T Y O F T I G A R D
Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done
TIGARD
•
City of Tigard
1 ar Triangle
STRATEGIC PLAN
Tigard City Council and Planning Commission I Dec. 17,2013
Project Schedule and Tasks
2013 2014 2015
Task lx Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4t Qtr 1"Qtr 2"d Qtr 3rd Qtr 4d`Qtr 1"Qtr
Public Involvement and Interagency
• •
Coordination
Existing Conditions
Needs/Opportunities/Constraints and *
Tools Analysis
Options Development
• 0
Options Evaluation • Q
Final Recommended Plan&
Implementation Measures '■) *
Adoption Process
0 We are here
Options Development
• Primary Land Use Functions
• Road Network
• Bike/Pedestrian Network
• Open Space/Natural Areas
ii f Tigard Triangle
1 STRATEGIC PLAN
. 1 II • iii
111 i_,.. i r
• III R,
.!J L 1 I 8 I
1 - ,-,. 0. . I I li k
.
i 1
'• :
Option 1
• 30 units/acre
• 45 feet height limit
• FAR 1:1.5
_ ! 11 %
Option 2 l; ., :s �� A �•
• 50 units/acre --- -
• 75 feet height limit
• FAR 1:4 _ , ,--4:' ,-# f
A Z i.
..��
H •
H y•
U as
n 1 I
Primary Land -_,_2-_
. �i .
-
Use Functions M = s E
l . .. Li
LEGEND . I
0
4
■ c.-..w.r
r tiw...a..0�$. _
t.•..rte.••••ra.e.. —7— \'.
H 4nee•a
MEN ftaibemds•rhy, • H i
:t
DrN
1 0 Soo gee
F , 1hw
il.2,.....,,,,_, IF -
or
-- r i —-\ 41i
Ns. 1111111111h•\
4 ' t •. — .1.11/ 29:1'f'
'
{ �7Gi411 aFf � � }+1 .1-7,17,.., , siet4; _ ,,!:.1 N l _ .f+ fir,. �1 �, , .' ,-..�. 'S
Al
R N I�� -,, 'r' y : y I r"1 1
11111 •, -_�
11 M K 1 ra f' •--1,1. _
Active Ground 7:4111111.
f,M '. 111 �`.,
_la - W. •..r I
Floor Uses
ii :'-' -. .' rLi 1 A , .
L, , , .
ill Ili.
a It _
it 1111
..t"...
• X74 , ;,
1
}
-- E.
1,-----;
.....
,
Roadway and ... ..•
Bike/Pedestrian /'idini 111 II a
'limos a a i i
Network NM IMMO I 1 I-
I „Arnim a 1
, r-- - %gime •a ........
•
*441 , , ,. 1 •
,,, , Who a I t.-••.Z..'.--.
. _
. .. __
\‘' . .11 II
-
I I 1
•
.....
-....i.ii_...... WYNN a
. ....'
! i
M./
1.11.11110.06.y.,—
t.,
, ' I
Open Space & I
.! j
Natural Areas
4111reil lig:
I___
1 if
' qi
. .,.
stel
^ ' ■ If;: ' , .- ..
. . ,:,
- ..„-_,-.
, .,#, ilia
liglII ill I
I .......
7 i
1 1
- -;_
Next Steps
• Land Use and Infrastructure Options Evaluation
• Feasibility Analysis
• Review and feedback— preferred plan (2"d Quarter)
- TAC
- CAC
- Public Meeting
- Web
• City Council/Planning Commission updates (July)
r I '1' Y [) F T I G .1 I: 1)
0
(.'IN ,,f I igard
ti . Tigard Triangle
STRATEGIC PLAN
Questions ??