09/07/2004 - Packet Completeness
Review for Boards,
Commissions and
Committee Records
CITY of TIGARD
Planned Unit Development Committee
Name of Board, Commission or Committee
September 7,2004
Date of Meeting
To the best of my knowledge these documents are a complete copy of the official record.
C.L. Wiley
Print Name
- f
Signature
2/19/20113
Date
PD REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
September 7, 2004
Tigard Town Hall
7:00-8:30 p.m.
Agenda
1 . Roll Call 7:00-7:05
2. Adoption of May 3, 2004 Minutes 7:05-7:10
3. Activity: Drawing a Subdivision 7:20-7:45
4. Discussion: Brainstorming Code Revisions 7:45-8:15
5. Additional Agenda Items 8:15-8:30
Other Oregon Cities' Planned Development Ordinances
TIGARD
http://www.ci.tigard.or.us/business/municipal_code/docs/title 18/18350—1.pdf
BEAVERTON
http://www.ci.beaverton.or.us/departments/CDD/docs/development/Chgpter60/60 35.doc
WEST-LINN
http://www.ci.west-linn.or.us/Services/Planning/CDC/CommDevCode/CDC-Ch.24.pdf
EUGENE
http://www.ci.eugene.or.us/Cityreco/Ciiycode/Chapter9/c9.8000-971 O.htm
LAKE OSWEGO
http://www.ci.oswego.or.us/tools/citycode/GetCode.aspx?50
GRESHAM
http://www.ci.gresham.or.us/departments/cedd/dp/code/article6/section603.pdf
WILSONVILLE
http://www.ci.wilsonville.or.us/departments/com dev/planningjdocuments/DC%20Zonin
g.pdf
PORTLAND
http://www.planning.ciportland.or.us/zoning/ZCTest/600/638 planned development.pdf
Morgan Tracy- Re: opn: Net density calculations Page 1
From: Siegelplanning@aol.com
To: <opn@lists.uoregon.edu>
Date: 8/28/04 1:16PM
Subject: Re: opn: Net density calculations
Here's my three cents in response to Morgan Tracy's comment:
If a city deducted private open space and water quality facilities from the
density calculation, as suggested by Morgan, how would the planner make the
density determination at the counter, without a dimensioned site plan? Would the
deduction apply to yard areas and landcape buffers? Even those that are
applied through discretionary reviews? Would the underlying zoning really reflect
the comprehensive plan? What assumptions would be used in determining land needs
under ORS 197.296? What unintended consequences could arise under ORS 197.303
and 307 (needed housing, clear and objective standards)? Some jurisdictions
actually reward projects that go above and beyond minimum open standards by
providing a density bonus, or at least a density transfer.
Scot
Scot Siegel, AICP
Principal
Siegel Planning Services, LLC
16067 SW Boones Ferry Road
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
ph (503) 699-5850
direct(503) 476-6650
fax (503) 699-7044
siegelplanning@aol.com
www.siegelplanning.com
--- StripMime Report-- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body-- kept)
text/html
Please provide committee members with the forms or requirements referenced at
18.350.090.A.4 and 18.350.090.13, where it is stated that the Director has more detailed
requirements for a planned development.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CHANGES
For TCDC 18.350.090, add"lot coverage, landscaping area, open space area, location of
buildings, streets, parking configuration, utility easements, landscaping or other site
improvements". This is necessary information to allow determination of compliance with
18.350.030.B.1.
For TCDC 18.350.100.A, restate as"The provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site
Development Review, are not applicable to conceptual plans for a Planned Development.
Chapter 18.360 is applicable to detailed development plans for a Planned Development"
to clarify the different requirements between conceptual and detailed development plans
under Chapter 18.350.
For TCDC 18.350.110.A.1, restate as"The area to be designated as open space and the
proposed conveyance documents of subsection 2 below shall be submitted as part of the
detailed development plan." This will clarify the sequence of information submittal for
open space. In subsection 2.b,the city attorney's review and approval of the terms of
conveyance should be stated as a requirement for approval of the detailed development
plan under Chapter 18.350.
For TCDC Table 18.510.2, define Maximum Lot Coverage for larger lot sizes as follows:
"20%, 30%,40%and 50%"respectively for R1, R2, R3.5 and R4.5 residential zones to
recognize that Tigard's comprehensive plan desires that such lots retain natural features
wherever possible.
For TCDC 18.715.020.A.l.c, add"including surface water drainage channels, water
quality treatment facilities and retention ponds, swales and associated dedicated tracts"to
recognize that these areas are not able to be developed.
For TCDC 18.715.020.A.2, add"and privately held dedicated open space" to recognize
that such space, as dedicated to a homeowners association, is not able to be developed.
For TCDC 18.715.020.3, delete"When information is not available . . . . (to end of
section)" in recognition that all detailed development plans are required to show
(preliminary plat information)all land dedicated for public rights of way.
For TCDC 18.715.020.A.4, add"including sidewalks and planter strips"to recognize that
these areas are not able to be developed.
Delete TCDC 18.715.030 in its entirety.
ccyt-D vat 0/
3Sv• i10 .. +
1/` nu+-.h u i N
Committee Name
VOLUNTEER SIGN-IN SHEET
Date Volunteer Name HOURS Comments
11.710
9/1104
9/-7/04 Ron E1165, - Z
/7/09 ► a.,,t d t,Jak( 2
I` n\susank\smarttr.doc