Loading...
05/09/2005 - Packet Parks & Recreation Advisory Board AGENDA Monday May 9, 2005 7:00 p.m. Tigard Water District Building 8777 SW Burnham Street The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is to advocate for park and recreation opportunities for a growing Tigard. 1 . Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Comments from the audience 4. Issues to Discuss With Council at May 17 Joint Meeting - Power point presentation (Board check-off & future presentations) - Alcohol in the parks - Draft of City map showing park coverage in Tigard (Park System Master Plan calls for the ideal of a neighborhood park located within '/2 mile of every residence) 5. David Baumgarten suggested agenda items. - The city write letters to property owners of undeveloped land asking if they would be willing to sell part (or all) of their land to the city for future park/green space. - We have criteria for evaluating potential new park space - Consider options to purchase property. - Tigard sets aside matching money for METRO levy funds 6. Adjourn Recreation Programs A Community Recreation Center & Park Land Acquisitions for Tigard Oregon Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Tigard, Oregon 2005 Today's Presentation. . . • Introduction of the Park & Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) • Results of Tigard's 2004 Phone Survey — Recreation Program — Community Recreation Center — Land Acquisitions • Public Participation 1 mown WHO is the PRAB? • PRAB — Park&Recreation Advisory Board — Re-established in 2003 — Board consists of seven(7) Tigard citizens — Additional representatives from the • Planning Commission • Youth Advisory Council • Tigard-Tualatin School District • Alternates PRAB's Purpose? • To be an Advisory Board for Tigard's: — Public Works Director — City Council Members • To work as, and advocate for and/or against, topics concerning Parks & Recreation in Tigard 2 2004 Phone Survey • Phone Survey — Conducted in the summer of 2004 — Scientifically valid — Consisted of 383 randomly chosen Tigard residents • Overall results were favorable on many issues • Results have assisted the PRAB in focusing its efforts Results for Recreation Programs Such as children classes,day camps,summer playground program,special events,trips, outdoor programs—hiking/rock climbing/water activities,after school care programs,adult programs such as sports leagues and classes • 60% support recreation programs in order to enhance Tigard's livability • 57% support the creation of a recreation division • 48% willing to pay for a City recreation division — At a cost of$0.22 per$1,000 of assessed property value 3 Ideas for a Recreation Program • Feasibility of a City Recreation Division — Estimated cost of 5860,000 per year($0.22 per$1,000 assessed property value) — Potential program offerings include:children classes,day camps,summer playground program, special events,trips,outdoor programs—hiking/rock climb water activities,after school care programs,adult programs such as sports leagues and classes • Centralized Community Recreation Center 52%support a$6.75M bond measure to fund a Community Recreation Center ($0.13 per$1,000 of assessed property value) — House programs offered by a City Recreation Division — 30,000 sq.R building with: • Indoor Gym • Classrooms • Mulit-Purpose Rooms for classes/meetings/ewrits 4 p Survey Results for Land Acquisition • Respondents favored a bond measure to purchase: — Wetlands&Green Space(49%favored to 38%opposed) — $5 million($0.09 annually per$1,000 of assessed property value) • 69% of respondents supported the following statement, 25% opposed the statement: — "I like the idea that the city is considering the protection of natural wetland&greenways. I favor the idea that would preserve our natural resources." 4 Current Park Land in Tigard • Park land acreage in Tigard — Goal is 11 acres per 1,000 residents — Currently just under 8 acres per 1,000 residents — Of 351 acres of park land, 179 acres are developed • As Compared to other communities: — Portland @ 44 acres per 1,000 residents — Lake Oswego @ 16 acres per 1,000 residents — Tualatin @ 8 acres per 1,000 Land Acquisition Funding Sources (not meant to be all inclusive) • Park System Development Charges • Grants — Metro — Oregon Park&Recreation Department — Federal Grants • Non-Profit Organizations — Three Rivers Land Conservancy — Trust for Public Land • Land Acquisition Bond Levy • General Fund 5 r ® We Want To Know What You Think • Should Tigard pursue the: — Creation of a City Recreation Division? — Building of a Community Recreation Center? • Should Tigard purchase additional land? — And if so,what types of acquisitions should be made? • Open Spaces • Active Park Land The PRAB Encourages Public Participation • We're Asking Residents — For feedback on Park& Recreation issues — For assistance with fund raising efforts — To volunteer — To voice your opinions — To share information with neighbors and community 6 Encouraging Public Participation • Participate at PRAB meetings: Held on: 2nd Monday of each month Held at: Tigard Water Building @ 7:00 pm • Send comments to PRAB at: parkrecboard@ci.tigard.or.us 7 Draft Council resolution , 5/2/05 A resolution adopting principles developed by the City Council as they consider the location and purchase of park and open space properties: Where as the Tigard City Council recognizes the need for additional park and open space properties in the Tigard Community, Where as the Tigard City Council has adopted an annual goal for 2005 of "Identify and Acquire Parks and Open Space'; Where as the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has also been given the task to: evaluate potential park and open space needs, obtain public input and support, and make recommendations to the City Council relating to the funding of these needs Where as past City councils had elected to not purchase or secure land for parks and open spaces outside the city limits. Where as the City Council wishes to adopt a framework and evaluation process to accept donated property, and/or to accept property offered by developers in lieu of SDCs for parks and open space, and that the framework presented by staff on April 19, 2005 is deemed adequate Where as the City Council recognizes that state law requirements set forth that development cannot be forced to pay for the current deficiencies Tigard has in its parks and open space inventory, Now there fore, the Tigard City Council directs staff to: 1) evaluate all park and open space donation requests with the attached matrix, and submit a staff recommendation to the City Council for each donation request 2) Prioritize the search and evaluation of future park sites to those areas identified ascur�ntl underserved. The City's adopted Master Plan defines "underserved" as areas not within '/z mile of a neighborhood park. 3) Attempt to use City Funds/SDCs/grants/etc. for parkland purchases inside the City Limits, and parks SDC revenue/grants/etc. for purchases of land outside the city limits, but within the UGB or UGB expansion areas 4) Look to serve those areas which will become park deficient over time. 5) Look to purchase or obtain parcels with some size as compared to multiple small parcels if possible. 6) Authorizes the evaluation and acquisition of suitable parcels outside the City Limits 7) Consider land banking adequate lands for future development. At L Recreation Programs A Community Recreation Center & Park Land Acquisitions for Tigard Oregon Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Tigard, Oregon 2005 Dp o e Today' s Presentation . . . • Introduction of the Park & Recreation Advisory Board (PR,4B) • Results of Tigard's 2004 Phone Survey - Recreation Program - Community Recreation Center - Land Acquisitions • Public Participation WHO is the PRAB? • PRAB - Park & Recreation Advisory Board - Re-established in 2003 - Board consists of seven (7) Tigard citizens - Additional representatives from the p � Planning Commission • Youth Advisory Council • Tigard-Tualatin School District • Alternates PRAB' s Purpose? • To be an Advisory Board for Tigard"s: - Public Works Director - City Council Members • To work as, and advocate for and/ or against, topics concerning Parks & Recreation in Tigard 2004 Phone Survey • Phone Survey - Conducted in the summer of 2004 - Scientifically valid - Consisted of 383 randomly chosen Tigard residents • Overall results were favorable on many issues • Results have assisted the PRAB in focusing its efforts Results for Recreation Programs Such as children classes, day camps, summer playground program, special events, trips, outdoor programs - hiking/rock climbing/water activities, after school care programs, adult programs such as sports leagues and classes • 60 % support recreation programs in order to enhance Tigard's livability • 57% support the creation of a recreation division • 48 % willing to pay for a City recreation division - At a cost of $0.22 per $1,000 of assessed property value r Idea for 's a Recreation Program • Feasibility of a City Recreation Division - Estimated cost of$860,000 per year ($0.22 per $1,000 assessed property value) - Potential program offerings include: children classes, day camps, summer playground program, special events, trips, outdoor programs - hiking/rock climbing/water activities, after school care programs, adult programs such as sports leagues and classes • Centralized Community Recreation Center 52% support a $6.75M bond measure to fund a Community Recreation Center ($0.13 per $1,000 of assessed property value) - House programs offered by a City Recreation Division - 30,000 sq. ft. building with: • Indoor Gym • Classrooms • Mulit-Purpose Rooms for classes/meetings/events a Survey Results for Land Acquisition • Respondents favored a bond measure to purchase: - Wetlands & Green Space (49% favored to 38% opposed) - $5 million ($0.09 annually per $1,000 of assessed property value) • 69% of respondents supported the following statement, 25% opposed the statement: - "I like the idea that the city is considering the protection of natural wetland & greenways. I favor the idea that would preserve our natural resources." Current Park Land in Tigard • Park land acreage in Tigard - Goal is 11 acres per 1,000 residents - Currently just under 8 acres per 1,000 residents - Of 351 acres of park land, 179 acres are developed • As Compared to other communities: - Portland @ 44 acres per 1,000 residents - Lake Oswego @ 16 acres per 1,000 residents - Tualatin @ 8 acres per 1,000 Land Acquisition Funding Sources (not meant to be all inclusive) • Park System Development Charges • Grants - Metro - Oregon Park & Recreation Department - Federal Grants • Non-Profit Organizations - Three Rivers Land Conservancy - Trust for Public Land • Land Acquisition Bond Levy • General Fund We Want To Know What You Think • Should Tigard pursue the: - Creation of a City Recreation Division? - Building of a Community Recreation Center? • Should Tigard purchase additional land? - And if so, what types of acquisitions should be made? • Open Spaces • Active Park Land ' The PRAB Encourages Public Participation • We're Asking Residents 114-4 - For feedback on Park & Recreation issues - For assistance with fund raising efforts - To volunteer - To voice your opinions - To share information with neighbors and community Encouraging Public Participation • Participate at PRAB meetings: Held on: 2ndMonday of each month Held at: Tigard Water Building @ 7:00 pm • Send comments to PRAB at: parkrecboard@ci.tigard.or.us ►►, a � ,;; # at � .�'✓ , \ ti�t L'r Ler .�yyvy ���t1(f�'�f` J" �1 Ari` Y X � ~ •G.+S �J� 'A.� 1!. .r• KGs'� l s�� �T'� �� .'�� _ 1�� er \� �,• 'cii. �� � '.�. _'cam' ri-�;-, J.'p,.. ^c. ^c4 ��� rei Ow � '�;� �; �'; a ,:tea' � �"a���`• �z - � _ ffi!§RF!li7 J it tMw .. y TIGARD CITIZEN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LAND ACQUISITIONS FOR FY06-06 OWNER LOCATION ACRES COST CURRENT CONDITION POTENTIAL BENEFITS TO COMMUNIITY Private Shady Ln., 3 $60,000 Ash Creek, wetlands/floodplain Open space w/trail Protection of natural resources NE Tigard which meets City's Goal 5 program obligations. Provides public open sace&trail in arklo ens ace deficient area Comments: This site is in Wash. Sq. Regional Area, and has an old railroad berm on its S. edge which is where the Regional Trail could be sited. See attached aerial photo, no other photos available. Private Hall Blvd. 1.15 $200,000 Ash Creek with riparian forest Open space w/trail Same as above. Metzger estimate with large mature oaks and ash Comments: This site is a mature forest with towering Oregon ash and oaks and a lush undamtory with the creek at the east edge. It already has a small path through the center. It would make a great small open space with a single trail. It would be a crime to have part of it developed as"commercial"which would ruin the site since most of the big trees would have to be cut and wildlife would disappear. See attached hotos. Private 3.5 $500,000 Mature upland forest with wetland Park/open sace w/ Same as above. D. Gates SE Tigard estimate trail Comments: This site is surrounded by houses and is already being used as a park by the neighbors. It has a diverse mix of native trees and abundant wildlife. Nei hbors help to maintain the trail in the site and pick up(rash, etc. No photos available. Private North Dakota, 2 $400,000 Upland forest with open grassy Park with trail, play Provides park and open sace in N. Tigard estimate field nearby area and some open park deficient area. space Comments: This site is completely surrounded by houses except on the east edge which is where the property owner is located and is where the open field is located. This site would make a perfect park for the nei hborhood which cu ntly has no parkland. Please see attached photos. Private 74th/Ventura 9.3 $1,500,00 Upland cedar forest, wetlands& Open space w/trail Protection of natural resources NE Tigard estimate Ash creek which meets Cit 's Goal 5 program We need obligations. $250K to Provides public open sace&trail in secure) park/open sace deficient area Comments: This site is the last and largest western red cedar forest left in the Portland area and in the region. It is so significant that we believe we should set aside some funds now for its purchase later this year when we believe it will become available. If we can secure the $250K now, we will be in a position to work with several local non-profits who will help us purchase this site. No photos available. Private N of Deer Cr. Sc1.5 $165,000cast Beautiful mature forest with large Open space/park Provides open space and park in Wood/Wri Bull Mtn. old trees. ark/o ens ace deficient area Comments Willing sellers,CC&Rs require 1.5a. Lots,surrounded by old stone wall;great for bik&Walk;neighbors&community groups could easily maint No photos available. Private 133d Ave. 2.25 $250,000 Upland forest 0 en s ace/ ark Same as above. C Cameron Bull Mtn. Comments One of 2 parcels for sale by Charlie Cameron. This one is in forest deferral&will be clearcut if not sa saved; current) listed--ACT FAST wonderful open s ace/ ark wAraif for the nei hborhood. Private 72nd Ave. 5 $600,000? Riparian wooded area with stream Open space w/trail Same as above. ,oust S. of 99 est. estimated Comments: 1 was unable to contact the property owner. This site is a beautiful wooded area and would make a Rreat open space with a trail. There are no parks or open spaces in this part of Tigard No photos available. R Tigard Land Acquisitions FY 05-06 Supplemental Info(via Lisa Hamilton-Treick) In addition to the properties listed on Sue Beilke's spreadsheet,a few others deserve consideration: 7+acres next to the 1.5 a. north of Deer Creek School. Owned by the Kalberers. Contiguous to that are Charlie Cameron's 2 tracts; one of these is listed on Sue's sheet at $250K. The other 2+ acres contains a residence&is listed at$725K. Being shown as we speak. Contiguous to that is 11+ acres owned by Gholi Ameri. It is upland forest with creeks. In forest deferral, so likely to be clearcut if not preserved. Price unknown. Note that these contiguous properties could provide vast open space, preserve slope- stabilizing&runoff-controlling vegetation&crucial habitat,and provide connectivity for human& wildlife residents. If these forest deferred tracts are not preserved,they will be clearcut and the massive scar left in the wake of the chainsaws will be visible for miles around. I .i "M y , c: ry � •f '9+ 4 �r+4{ �i L t Via_ .,t tat � .•�t :t f r� �''s$ ?` � �af�'.����t.'t�� r:� &^y, u . i MI Y-e s ,'fir •../ ���� '�.r' ,� `t�� '� fr�/'y � �' � :44- 47 '. r. • .�,, ;x- r C� !/!yam>i��',.,�.� •,.. __: -3 .17 '. 'v'a "° T 'r k Laarc&..........=°'. w.a a., _ b> •''E,.-i• ul-. M��l t • 2` iYy� *gyp `,�: •'r �� _ .w F .J•1 .yr �y� . � � �" .t j£n�`i �, � �-�� �' .. /.y� •i�• �:f,. '4'Ifi�' 1 j �•-� I �� c �, 4.1 � ',1�' I Al Y a ja I - OF - .� 4�� i � � �3Y�: • 3 a ..,rte It 71-im ♦ t f?9 ' - 1' -:. '�',� +IIA ♦ x .,, ..y A*:+• �♦33�op .. ,y.!, 'Z^ir j F♦v,.,.. .. oil • F� fie '�. ,. h[d{YL 2�,r. + t m: ;fix :, . . ". . • - �: r •! .'t.,* `� � 7 y� � .. .. _ � _ - 4{. '� �'� • /.tib ! r �y .icy; Y. .:S #h1 �^�_✓^-{ •:r' _..-' :, �` 1.. ..L1".• /��f �"-.�:, � .� i, ,�,• .,ter ...r ..:� - �%}��r N - ,��i4Y'.YK�F= -�.r. _ ..it�..Sicii•'^ � _ _ � '.�i.�t.x�r_��� .-_ � � ,� . - r a r 7 �- Arlt`• �b�y ••'.: ��. r a ; ter_ ,Yr• ` ice' i S }4 o / 0 Geographic Infmmadon System LO CD o o L0 Lr) _: o t j o o $ fi '1S "c�"mar D— .-6- - - - 10 g 8 7 �. ',,5 4 3 f ii a 4 f City of Tigard - 1 , _f - ZONING DISTRICTS and - ,._ •,- � C.R..�„C••,.•d. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS `M , CBD Cw"Bu•ar•d DYtla I'L Lw Aw W4uw w NUE Abd Enpb/nwd WE AIt•d W.UN EnObplwu t --_.._ _ • �+' - - "^� - - - r - - S x n Reddw" NUR2 Mb dUM R .W.W7 4 R - 4 - 5 '" R.I W 4. � - .00O 54_ A FL W La S ' .. •___.., - __ ._. _-- -- - - _. -: -.j: - - - - - x0.000 8V Fl.Wla S¢e __ _ ,d .•. _- J, Y R T91'1t - - __ - -J P-25 1.4SO SC FI W la SU "t4 R-J 5 10.000 S4.Ft W La 5lxe RJ.5 ].SW B4.FL W W S. \ 2 } - (_ __ _S .r•• .� 1- -� - - LLLJJI = _ R.Q 40 ikw W Ma -+R.Y 5.000 Sq.Ft W to&u CDWKNERSNE PLM _ �'.�-, �+.����2� � �. I�A ���. ',,.,.. ,loft u "�..�! - ���. ,. _ _ - - - ��R.Ip6•dwdd t•mnivaN _ _ � .._ .. - E q _ -.. �•rr ,i A ,,. _'R-a5 , _ _ - - P,a...w,.;ca1,R,uar 1 . - - -..swan D.ra R..u.+w AL+w+yw�sw•w WnA -- T �-'" �. a _ , s;t _ rxrR-t R-4 5 Fi 12 ,F._ um tar,wcwR as b,_ ---- - 1 _ -R-45 �Mudu.. t R-�.5 VA"u..El pbp d 2 _ F „ Wmdu.�i – --- ow sp— UM 71 74 P. _ - -- - _ � y, y - u _ re. e A 2- 3 1• � _ -14500 ; F _ R 3 5 R-A 3 _ R42 ;f wo - F" 1.m A•d4a 1650D—� d leoo DUR i 1 _ City ofTigrd f Bull Mountain E SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AND _ r CULTURAL RESOURCES I WATER AREA AND WETLANDS - r - - x r a and areas an - . 100 year flood plain drainage hazard d ponds. except those already developed WILDLIFE HABITAT Sensitive habitats identified by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife,the Audubon Society Urban Wildlife Habitat Map, - - and forested areas coin-cidental with water areas and wetlands WATER AREAAND WETLANDS\BFISHAND WILDLIFE HABITAT ' Water areas and wetlands that are also fish and wildlife habitat 6 SIGNIFICANT NATURALAREA Sites of special importance,in their natural condition,for their ecologic,scientific,and educational value- r OPEN SPACE/BICYCLE PATHWAYS ~- 4 �--} Existing parks,recreation sites,golf courses,cemeteries,school --- - `\ play-grounds,powerline rights-of-ways,and future park sites owned by the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District s u Existing bicycle pathways r = i r HISTORIC AND CULTURAL\I;ESOURCE OVERLAY DISTRICT Historic Resources described in the Washington County Cultural 1 ' ' P R _ Resources Inventory,including sites.structures,objects and buildings. y Historic buildings and structures are protected by regulations in the County's Historic and Cultural Resource Overlay District. I fL / AGGREGATE f MINERAL DISTRICT A !� Identified mineral/aggregate resource area MINERAL / AGGREGATE DISTRICT B Existing or potential mineral/aggregate impact area. RESOURCE OVERLAP Indicates that more than one significant natural resource is located on this site. In such cases.the provisions of the Plan and Code for each resource apply SCENIC RESOURCES i.. __.. \'' ' Scenic Routes Roads identified as excellent scenic roads and those sections of - "� - good scenic roads which offer a vista of the Tualatin Valley or the - - Cascade Mountains.Scenic Routes also include those stretches --- ° " of streams which are identified as candidate rourtes for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic River system c - � ----- _ - Q Scenic Views m x _ Viewpoints providing a vista of the Tualatin Valley,the Cascade r--—�— -- Mountains,or other scenic feature. C.; Scenic Features Land forms,vegetation or water courses with aesthetic value u t to the surrounding area. PARK DEFICIENT AREA A K D E p Area more than 1/2 mile from a park site or a public school -� _ � -.•.'" playground. POTENTIAL PARK/OPEN SPACEAFECREATION AREA �r A- G Generalized indication of an area described in the Community - Plan text as offenng the opportunity for private or public recreational or open space uses Print Date: February 2005 - ��t � 4�.u Ih� a J �� � •Iluy _ T� .�,.'1'��i t. � r+a Rw+►qac.' �y •tii �`. " / tr. •-mow ,i �/!�.,' +I y(� �§i» V �'~ .. �* ,t�„� JL i5 .Sa ` - ." - iY s M .l' Y �rY tton 1