The URL can be used to link to this page

08/10/2011 - Packet Completeness Review for Boards, Commissions 9% and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD City Center Advisory Commission Name of Board, Commission or Committee August 10, 2011 Date of Meeting I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record. Caren Frykiand Print Name 01 A INA C&LI Signature 10 11/8/11 Date n = � City of Tigard TIGARD City Center Advisory Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: Wednesday,August 10, 2011 — 6:30-8:40 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Public Library- 2nd Floor Conference Room 13500 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. Welcome and Introductions......................................................................................................6:30 — 6:35 2. Review / Approve July Minutes ...............................................................................................6:35 — 6:40 3. Non-Agenda Items/ Public Comment....................................................................................6:40 — 6:45 4. Main Street Green Street............................................................................................................6:45 — 7:20 Presentation and comment on 60% Design Plans (Project Manager Kim McMillan and Sean Farrelly) 5. Discussion of Downtown Organization...................................................................................7:20 — 8:00 Review of CCAC's 2009 recommendations and discussion of Micbele Reeves recommendation (Chair Murphy,Vice-chair Shearer, and Commissioner Craghead) 6. Formation of CCAC Downtown Public Art Subcommittee.................................................8:00 — 8:15 Action item-form CCAC Downtown Public Art Subcommittee and appoint members (Sean Farrelly) 7. Downtown Parking Recommendations....................................................................................8:15— 8:20 Summary of final memo and next steps (Sean Farrelly) 8. CCAC Executive Session*..........................................................................................................8:20— 8:40 Property purcbase discussion 9. Adjourn .........................................................................................................................................8:40 p.m. *EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Center Advisory Commission will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. Upcoming meetings of note: 9/7, HCT Citizen Advisory Committee,Library 2nd Floor Conference Room, 6:30-8:30 PM 9/14, CCAC Regular Meeting, Library 2nd Floor Conference Room, 6:30-8:30 PM CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA—August 10, 2011 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 City Center Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes Date of Meeting: August 10, 2011 Location: Tigard Public Library — 2nd Floor Conference Room Called to order by: Chair Thomas Murphy Time Started: 6:31 p.m. Time Ended: 8:56 p.m. Commissioners Present: Carolyn Barkley;Alexander Craghead; Ralph Hughes; Peter Louw; Chair Thomas Murphy; Linli Pao (arrived 7:00);Nice Chair Elise Shearer; Philip Thornburg Commissioners Absent: Alice Ellis Gaut Others Present: Deenie Bush, Sherrie Devaney, Councilor Marland Henderson Staff Present: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager; Caren Frykland, Sr. Administrative Specialist; Kim McMillan, Engineering Manager AGENDA ITEM #1: Welcome and Introductions Introductions were made. AGENDA ITEM #2: Approve Minutes Motion by Commissioner Shearer, seconded by Commissioner Craghead, to approve the minutes of the July 13, 2011 meeting. The motion passed. Commissioner Hughes abstained. AGENDA ITEM #3: Non-Agenda Items/Public Comment There was no public comment. AGENDA ITEM #4: Main Street Green Street Kim McMillan was present to discuss the 60% design plan for the Main Street Green Street project. She said that much of the area around the turnaround on Main Street would be drivable, though raised slightly, with an open area for landscape or art in the center. She said that the water quality areas would be similar to those on Burnham; they would collect the water but have an under-drain system so that water would not pond. CCAC Meeting Minutes for August 10,2011 Page I of 4 Commissioner Louw asked homer the parking behind Pro Design Solutions would be achieved. McMillan said that the city was working with property owners in that area to change the access to enter near the brewpub and exit near Maplewood Drive. She said that it was a work in progress and could still change from the design plan. McMillan said that because the project involved grant money with federal oversight, they needed to reach a certain completion stage before ODOT would authorize the right of way phase. She said that they had reached that stage and would start doing right of way acquisition, many of which were only small portions of land. She said that the bus stops would be in front of the car wash and the liquor store, and that they would work with TriMet to make appropriate improvements at those stops. Commissioner Louw said that many of the streetlights and plantings were in the sidewalk and potentially restricting pedestrian flow. McMillan said that the trees were not in their permanent places on the plan. She said that the trees could likely not be moved into the planters because of the water quality features. She said that there were many places where the sidewalks would be less than six feet wide. Commissioner Louw asked about the offset location for the Fanno Creek Trail crossing at Main Street. McMillan said that it was offset slightly in order to minimize weight on the bridge and bridge impact panels. She said that they were also hoping to add signage at the Fanno Creek Trail entrances as well. McMillan discussed the timeline for completing the project as well. She said that there would be a survey of downtown business owners asking about when customers utilize their services, customer parking habits, etc., followed by meetings with business owners to discuss the project logistics. She said that there was a water and sewer project planned to be completed in the summer of 2012, then the Main Street Green Street project could begin. Commissioner Louw asked if,in consideration of the impact on business, there was a reason why both projects could not be completed simultaneously. McMillan said that it would extend the contract length and cost as well as the length of time to complete, and that if the two projects were tied together they would both have to comply with the federal standards that only apply to Main Street Green Street. Commissioners debated the pros and cons of completing the two projects simultaneously. AGENDA ITEM #5: Discussion of Downtown Organization Chair Murphy introduced the discussion of a downtown organization. He said that it had been discussed more than two years ago, and at that time it was decided to wait. He said that Michele Reeves's recent work on downtown recommended the creation of a downtown organization. He asked the commission if it was time to reopen the discussion of the creation of a downtown organization. CCAC Meeting Minutes for August 10,2011 Page 2 of 4 Deenie Bush said that she supported the creation of a downtown organization at this time, especially in light of the construction projects coming. She said that a downtown organization with a strong events calendar could help strengthen the downtown community. Sherry Devaney agreed that the time is right for the creation of a downtown organization. Chair Murphy said that there was a strong consensus on the commission that discussions on creation of a downtown organization be reopened. The following issues were discussed at length: • Public support of a downtown organization • Should the first step be to select leadership or create the organization • Potential for seed money from the city • The Oregon City model of downtown organization • Creation of a Downtown Organization sub-committee to research and provide recommendations to the CCAC This issue was added to the agenda for the October meeting for further discussion. AGENDA ITEM #6: Formation of CCAC Downtown Public Art Subcommittee Sean Farrelly said that the Public Art Subcommittee would be made up of three CCAC members, two downtown business owners, one artist, and one additional member. Valerie Otani will be the consultant. He said that he had citizen interest forms from three members of the public —Sherrie Devaney of Sherrie's jewelry Box, Brett Vinsant of Live Laugh Love Glass, and Susan Gallacher- Turner, a Tigard artist. He said that there was one more position open, and that there are two or three more citizen interest forms expected. He said that the subcommittee would make recommendations to the CCAC on budget, timelines and other general issues. Motion by Chair Murphy, seconded by Commissioner Craghead, to appoint the following six members to the CCAC Public Art Subcommittee passed: • Sherrie Devaney, business owner • Brett Vinsant, business owner • Susan, Gallacher-Turner, artist • Elise Shearer, CCAC • Alice Ellis-Gaut, CCAC • Alexander Craghead, CCAC. Commissioner Thornburg was also suggested as an alternate member. Commissioner Thornburg abstained from voting. CCAC Meeting Minutes for August 10,2011 Page 3 of 4 AGENDA ITEM #7: Downtown Parking Recommendations Sean Farrelly discussed the draft of the downtown parking study recommendations. He said that there were only minor changes since the last time it was discussed. He said that he would get recommended language for evaluating requests for 15 minute limit parking spaces from the consultants. AGENDA ITEM #8: Executive Session* *The City Center Advisory Commission went into Executive Session at 8:22 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.60(2) (c) to discuss real property transaction negotiations. iU discussions within this session are confidential; therefore, nothing from this session may be disclosed by those present. Executive Session concluded at 8:55 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #9: Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 8:56 cog&W 44AA Caren Frykland, V4Secretary ATTEST: g ;` Chair Thomas M h CC AC Meeting Minutes for August 10,2011 Page 4 of 4 .!PI City of Tigard Memorandum To: Thomas Murphy, Chair, City Center Advisory Commission From: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager Re: Downtown Public Art Subcommittee Date: August 2, 2011 August's agenda will include an agenda item requesting that the City Center Advisory Commission form a Downtown Public Art Subcommittee and appoint members. The CCAC by-laws Section 1 (e) permits the formation of"subcommittees to investigate areas relevant to its charge or duties." Formation of the group in this manner is more streamlined than forming an ad-hoc committee with members appointed by City Council. The subcommittee is proposed to have the following responsibilities: Overview of public art goals in Downtown Tigard • Review of streetscape plan Define the project • Location, budget, timeline Determine the goals and "character" of the art commission • type of artwork, i.e. interactive, iconic, series of elements • special focus, i.e. the environment, history • geographic area of call for entries: local, regional, national The process will include the subcommittee proposing a budget for public art. The CCAC can review the proposal at a subsequent regular meeting. In addition, the CCAC representatives can provide updates to the full commission after each meeting of the subcommittee. Appointing subcommittee members The CCAC will also be requested to appoint seven members of the subcommittee. More information on the candidates will be e-mailed prior to the August 10th meeting. INDEX OF SHEETS STATE OF OREGON SHEET NO, DESCRIPTION Shoot Index oheets dStd. Q . NOS. A N S P 0 R T A T I 0 N I) EPARTMENT OF TR PLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT GRADING, DRAINAGE ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT, ILLUMINATION, PAVING, & PAVEMENT MARKINGS "' M itr.ar tit. ,�. MAIN ST: RAIL CORRIDOR ® 99W � ` MAIN STREET, TIGARDt. LLIhF WASHINGTON COUNTY WOW SEPTEMBER 2012 OVERALL LENGTH OF PROJECT — 0.28 MTS ATTENTION- Oregon Low Requires You To Follow Rules Adopted By The Oregon Utility Notification Center. Those Rules Are Set Forth in OAR 952-001-0010 Through OAR 952-001-0090. You May Obtain Copies Of The Rules By Calling L.:�C��Ier. (Note: The Tele honeNumberForeegon iltifify Center Is 503) 232-1987.) END OF PROJECT �` ��''• ` ' �►' LETS ALL X-STP-7365(009) TO THER THIS STA: 14+00.00 JOB SAFE .1vr SIN COT WS RD SEC.2,T.2 S.,A.1 W. T � l Pf't S TAN ,P O 7 OREGON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 97T Gail Achtermon CHAIR Michael Nelson VICE-CHAIR Janice P� Wilson I ONER Alan Brown COMMISSONER J OOvid Lohman COMMISSIONER Matthew L. Garrett DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTA7i0N M^ These plans were developed using AASHTO design standards. PROJECT Exceptions to these standards,if any,have been submitted ped LOCA TION and approved by the ODOT Chief Engineer or their delegated Sp authority. ;z T Q�. W .Ez By. y � Tigard Signature&date A n i BEGINNING OF PROJECT Print name and title X-STP-7365(009) STA: 0`'00.00 Concurrence by ODOT Chief Engineer MAIN ST.RAIL CORRIDDR•99W VICINITY MAP MAIN STREET wASNCNcrnN COUNTY SCALE. I" = 1500, a FEDERAL HiGHWAY PROJECT NUMBER SHEET C L ADMINISTRATION N0. e OREGON X—STP-7365(009) 1 DIVISION SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. INDEX OF SHEETS CONT'D OREGON STANDARD DRO. NOS. CiTY OF PORTLAND STANDARD DRG. NOS. SHE7 uo. DF50RIP11ON RD250 Thrust Blocking P433 Pavement Marfdngs Standard Detail Blocks 1B Project Map RD254 Hydrant Installation RD300 Trench Backfill, Bedding, Pipe Zone And Multiple Installations 18-1 LoWd RD302 Street Cut 15-2 General Notes RD336 Standard Storm Sewer Manhole iB-3 General Not" RD342 Shallow Manhole RD344 Standard Manhole Some Section IC's Geometry and ROW AqqWtlon Plan RD356 Manhole Covers and Frames 2A T kcal Section RD360 Manhole Frame Adjustment 28's Details RD364 Concrete inlets Type G-1, G-2, 0-2M, G-2MA 2C's Traffic Control RD372 Concrete Inlet �,Base Optionype T3 a CG-3 2D Pie Data Sheet RD700 Curbs 2E to 2E-4 Demolition Plan RD705 Islands 3-3A Main Street Sto. 00+00 to Stu. 1+90 Notes & Plan RAccessible Route islands RD710 720 Sidewalks 4-4A Main Street Sto. 1+90 to Sta. 4+93 Notes & Pian RD750 Curb Line Sidewalk Driveways or Alleys (Options M & N) Local Jurledictions 5-5A Main Street Sto. 4+93 to Sta. 7+95 Notes & Pian RD755 Sidewalk Romp Details 6-6A Main Street Sta. 7+95 to Ste. 10+97 Notes & Plan RD756 Sidewalk Ramp Placement Options Curb Radii <= 15' 7-7A Main Street Sta. 10+97 to Sta. 14+00 Notes & Plan RD757 Sidewalk Ramp Placement Options Curb Radii > 15 RD759 Truncated Dome Detectable Warning Surface GA to GA-5 Erosion Control Plan RD1015 Inlet Protection (Type 4) Biolilter Bags Gd to Gl-4 Stormwater Notes & Pian RD1040 Sediment Fence, Supported Sediment Fence, Unsupported GN's Landscape and Irrl atlon Pian and Details TM500 Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks S to S-8 Striping and SIgning SigningPlan and Details ~ TM501 Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks TM502 Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks 1-0001 to 1-0010 Illumination Pion and Details TM503 Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks 00001 — 00002 Detector Pian TM505 Rail Crossing Pavement Markings SG to SG-3 Pedestrian Flasher Plan TM515 Pavement Markers TM530 intersection Pavement Markings (Crosswalk, Stop Bar, & Bike Lane Stencil) TM800 Tables, Abrupt edge And PCMS Details TMS21 Temporary Sign Supports TMM Closure Details TM850 2—Lane, 2—way Roadways DET4560 Pavement Marking Detail Blocks 1 "/0 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. --- fl }\ DrSo� 05 S1SroE ERS.PIAN�Wd 702 pscA%3AF HiT COTS •SUP03 ORS L4U !J(�1 IOl St Spol��Si�ckSuit.2o0 tbnlenG OR 91703 pAum:`4J 1311{71�.�.�.'.Fhrv.wn:k�591DI 1771 r i N E /� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS MAIN ST.RAIL CORRIDOR•99W pc ,i MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY Q APPROVED BY: GAA f p ti DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM 0 T 24, �� DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM 4'y At Fes' SHEET INDEX Of PLAN SHEETS EXPIRES: 12/31/11 1 A SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. 7 14+0 4 if00 2 -GA-4, GJ-8, GN-4, S-4, 1-0002 GA-2, GJ-4, GN-2, S-2, GA-3, GJ 6, 3, S 1 0002 GA, GJ, GN, S, 1-0001 — GJ-2, GN-1, S-1, 1-0001 1-0002 1 % SUB I OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Hou_f_Peterson R__iglieliis Inc. PROFFs LNc.i CC.d.el..,aix• .l1YDIClIL /1.1)31 LMw .iYkYCTPFO � $0 160 Ta354.SpAA,.Sinn Sar..20J Ponlind O0.i7]07f'ionl:lo3377.i1)7 n..1.Min<om 1,T.V32 ` 1 �'O PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS r SCALE: =166' 1 $63 1 �' MAIN SURAL C R ET RIDOR-NW WASHINGTON COUNTY G APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM T 24*1 DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM �f RY AL-F PROJECT MAP SHEET NO. �xplR>s: �2/si/ii STA.00+00 TO STA.14+00 1 B SEC.2,T.2 S9 R.1 W. TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND PROPOSED LEGEND STORM SEWER LINE PROPOSED STORM SEWER LINE UNDERGROUND WATER LINE SAN SANITARY SEWER LINE PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE OVERHEAD WARE - G--- — UNDERGROUND GAS LINE ----_ — PROPOSED PERFORATED PIPE ---- o --- CHAINLINK FENCE LINE O PROPOSED CLEANOUT OR STANDPIPE E. UNDERGROUND POWER LINE PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE/FO LINE PROPOSED CURB C J SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE IRRIGA11ON VALVE SD X SPRINKLER HEAD L. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK STORM SEWER MANHOLE TMETER ,1ll CABLETELEVISION RISER CATCH BASIN ® EL PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY �w CABLE T DITCH INLET POWER RISER L.�. d PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS CURB INLET TELEPHONE RISER L.C1eCd • ROOF DRAIN DOWN SPOUT GAS RISER PROPOSED WATER QUALITY PLANTINGS WATER VALVE (1 GAS VALVE C� «, FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS �] GAS METER WATER METER © �4 GAS STAND PIPE t5 FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION p UTILITY POLE WATER STAND PIPE F GUY WIRE WATER WATER VAULT y, l� UNKNOWr7 UTILITY MANHOLE SHRUB /BUSH _ 9 UNKNOWN STAND PIPE L CONIFEROUS TREE L UNKNOWN UTILITY VAULT 0 UNKNOWN UTILITY RISER DECIDUOUS TREE • BOLLARD SUBMITTAL- IrIrIA OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Houf Peterson Ri&llis Inc. 1+'vn ENL`INCERfi PL.HNFR9 1AN04CA l+E7'PCN ITE hbS fl RYEYD PB 1S V SOS SL Spulnn<Staei.5��k 700 Pan6nd pR 97701 15on�50)]71 1131 xru LSgrswn G,50)711 1171 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS MAIN ST:RAIL MAIN STR RID R-99W WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM r 24,, DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM SHEET EXPIRES: 12/31/13 LEGEND 18-1 SEC.2,T.2 S,,R.I W. E i. 113 SF OF ROW ACQUISITION: SEE • SHEET IC-1 FOR , . CONTINUATION ' PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT fM y PROPOSED ROW i = EXISTING ROW ` 4,6 ox 4 / ! ck �� J �/ o0 �° co/ of cNoNo , / lb m 1+00 ,Q CONSTRUCTION C CENTERLINE ♦ a • r T. ti v OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 814.15 SF ROW EXISTING ROW ACQUISITION: SEE D n Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. SHEET 1C-1 FOR PROPOSED ROW 1.0 FIR r.•c.,x.A�...[u_ACR: .IM CAC,kA AASPI- , f,VCTOAA :`nla[.,..n.an.a.s.,kxa n+uAr+r�k vrvrtvt r�fOrn�.nr�.....sy..an a wnvi nlj 20 �.�. CONTINUATION X N S1p PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SCALE: r= 20• PROPOSED TEMPORARY �� ` 11,863 MAIN ST:RAIL COORE�OR-99W MAIN STR CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT WASHINGTON COUNTY $ d APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY- JDW/AMM Ar 24, 9 DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM OgRY ALSO EET GEOMETRY AND ROW ACQUISITION PLAN SNO . Fx�IP-Es: Iz/sl/u STA,0+00 TO STA.1+90 1 C PROPOSED TEMPORARY sEc.�rrzs.,RJ w- 942 SF ROW a CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ACQUISITION. SEE C? PROPOSED�ROW SHEET 1C—, FOR o .7 ) .. .. .. S �a �`a A�.� ••(!'«•. S • • __. �'J,f.-.��—'.._'.i!`fti. . +••..{�"~-ti+�_• -a _!.'. _c! ,_...�'�'e_e•�'..�. e f.�-♦ ....1_•'`, -, i.f•�a-zi•-� __.-_... ..•-�1 _.'�. �F^_' q w��"L'S fiT[�x�.3-7'c'tt"YF C•�moO._Nyi!t T�.IN`•U• Aj( TJII'LOr Nr v •. - _ GD _ KEPL_E•R• ---SugZQS EMBLEM a recrr nru\VEN . DRIVERAIN W PERMA—TREAT 7CLEANERS 12537 12535 12533 1Z52� 1219 • HLSTE-lrR r-Y 12591 mo L R t XY '. – __ 'r...• � • . n r.w•- : • w,O aLs a.•� 140 MAIN ST. �� N � X 0 •S- � a .S, �5+00 4�� I 1 �' 6+00 0_ _ �°' CN7 00 - _ -- � o CN o CONSTRUCTION �' of CENTERLINE 1 b b lb S r — e e .O y 1~ ,�•r �� -� a �r: 2,274' SF � _--__ ACQUISITION. SE SHEETS • +j , r .y. _ ' F EXISTING ROW A-BOY 1C-1 AND 1C-3 FOR - POWELL PAINT CENTER o -- 12550 CONTINUATION 12540 PROPOSED ROW PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 6000 SUBMITTAL. T OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /•XLL.LLL Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. �V XN4rT.9 fLL I,l♦.,Irl YL whtlLL•,l MIIGMITl GTL •iY,Yi`_F= lfLf baYi 8f••.�••x b.w tLr 7lvtlwtlril mM: I+Mr}0.1JSI.11)1 rww llyrar 4•.fo.V hi 11'11 � -•�,.,r ';..�---2} �5 �r, 3 N � / PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SCALE: 1"= 20' 41' 11,863 ' MAIN ST.RAJL AIN CORRIDOR•99W I wWASHINGTON COUNTY Q APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/ADAM pr24.1g DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM cgRY Alf S� GEOMETRY AND ROW ACQUISITION PLAN No EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.4+93 TO STA.7+95 1C-2 SEC.4 T.2 S.,R.1 W. PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ti942 SF ROW SUB-SHOP ;; ACQUISITION. SEE IYLER'S,AUTOM071j1E SSS CAR WASH I-SHEET 1c-2 FOR • 12,¢85 12475 J" • r' CONTINUATION f ' Ni 0 , h STT50 - ¢�o ! ! s45, o+ Qy 8+00 o- 9+00 ! 1 o_ I I coNsrRUcrIoN 1 - ! CENTERLINE I cn o 20.1' ♦ n • } _ r— lid , :.I ;. _. ._ -. � '9 � -. • ., - `,, .._.. --- ,: ..- .� o �. _._. ..r • • •w. 4-1.T a �, t I 2,274 SF ROW PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCT!©N EASEMENT ACQUISITION SE SHEETS 1C-2 FOR POWELL PAINT LIQUOR 5 ORE ; B 33 t5 COMPUTER CENTER CONTINUATION 12490 `' 1460 ' SKILLS PLUS 12540 12448 TUALA71N VALLEY GLASS 12500 uw/ tiUBMITTAL OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /� Harper Houf Peterson Ri�hellis Inc. � PROFFs LN O.NF EnE.DE RNN£PE .L'/,NO SOA VE.9O H1TE CfS 'SURVEYOR!_ 0 10 20 EE lfl 7RS 51:.[nnl..n;Src.E Suite l0�IUnland,OP 9)40:�lmn.'OS 7]!IfJI nur AAEa.wm f.•:10317/1111 SG " 2 l 18fi3 � PUBLIC MAIN ST:RAIL CORRIDOR --99W r MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY 0 APPROVED BY. GAA pr0ry DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM r 24, DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM c�R Y ALF S� GEOMETRY AND ROW ACQUISITION SNO s EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.7+95 TO STA.10+97 1c-3 sFc.2,TY2S•,R.�w. i 77GARD CHIROPRAC77C CLINIC 12405 SHERRIES JEWELRY BOX 1,759 SF ROW SY z r; 71GARD AREA CHAMBER 5 1 12425 -. ACQUISITION. T ;; !� ' 1 OF 12345ERCE �y� p Iy r S t PROPOSED TEMPORARY ' J/ ' t CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT -`' � r •'i i x y k Pl ADSED RDW .� • . • !''.1 i j _. .--t l •y'� EXIS77NG1!ROW - 'L, tt.i �;�• °• � � .. i _ ..-!;' 1;y� ::� 's;,.! �_ _ �,_. _. .. ,.Y 't tit! •' v S + 1 ! } .... ...�...-j....,..._.._— .. ..._.._ ._.. _—...`....— .....—._ . r • ♦ ( 11+00 MAIN STO 0� 4 0� CONSTRUCTION -T- -7 CEN TERLINE cc,, ' � ... y. ,,•-rte •. . • �r • •'1'V, '� r i�j. y° � ... .. • r ;^�-�; y —�, y'� ` t r r .. __ _ , :.' .,, ... •R }.,rte - _ - ::X-='=`=•-'7':•:yS*��':1^.:.,-C.zx'.3'�--,.�z:..aX:,.. �i -'�Y c . -•fir. _.EL VWS� ALLEGRO 123$0 77GAROVILLE STA MUSTS ON 'MAIN CAFE FIRST BANK OF 77GARD ' 386 9 ► • + sAtoN 124aa 12442, _ + ACQUISITION. PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 6 "'1 b SUBMI17AL OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Ha!per Houfee e!son.Righellis Ine. J- 1 CM.Gf4i/li[ fi•�,.,iEkf •„YUCi4•Pt 1RCNI.tC[a •f ylf Yi Y4kt I YHSf.�pyxb>t«t Swk D44 hnrifN tYi167Tak ph,rr.t4A111.f fJl,.•r*.hty.ar 4v 3gl2l1 iIT! 0 10 G I N E / PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SCALE: +' = 20' 11,863 �'� MAIN SP RAJL STRLIMJV A EET •99W ; WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVED BY: GAA S� $ry DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM Ar 24. 9 DRAFTED BY; JDW/AMM CgRY ASF 5b GEOMETRY AND ROW ACQUISITION No T EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.90+97 TO STA.14+00 1C-4 TALL TYPE C CURB WITH TOE TALL CURB W17H TOE KICKER SEE SHEET 2B-2 KICKER STREET TREE PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN CROSSING CROSSING GRA TE (BOTH SIDES) STREET LIGHT GRATE SEE SHEET GN-13 2" COLD PLANE & OVERLAY (80TH SIDES) STANDARD CURB TREE GRATE SEE SHEET GN-12 AND GUTTER EXISTING PAVEMENT 7' SEE RD-720 PARALLEL SIDEWALK SIDEWALK16' ANGLED PARKING PARKING SEE RD720 1.5 4" — (3/" — D) BASERDCK E25Y, �. 2" OF LEVEL 3, PG 70—22 1/2" DENSE HMAC WEARING COURSE COMPACTED TO 919 OF ASTM D 2041 WIDE CURB -•-4--� 3.5' 7" OF OF LEVEL 3, PG 70-22 7.5' SIDEWALK AND GUTTER SAWCUT SIDEWALK - 1/2 DENSE HMAC 2 5' 3 SAWCUT 2.5' V - - COMPACTED TO 919 OF ASTM D 2041 PLANTER 12' LANE 12' LANE PLANTER 4' WIDE o J �'12" AGGREGATE BASE TREE WELL COMPACTED TO 959 OF ASTM D 1557 70 . ,� .. �� SUBGRADE GEOTEXPLE TYPICAL SECTION WITH , 45'/PARALLEL PARKING y AC PA VEI SEN T SECTION N.T.S. TALL CURB WITH TALL CURB WITH TOE KICKER STREET LIGHT 70E KICKER - STREET TREE (BOTH SIDES) (BOTH SIDES) STANDARD CURB 2" COLD PLANE & OVERLAY y AND GUTTER EXISTING PAVEMENT TREE GRATE SIDEWALK PLANTER WIDTH SIDEWALK VARIES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PLANTER WIDTH VARIES SAWCUT SAWCUT Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. I I��\ IaO,11T1 PF•�tk'INdi-A IM ob L•01 }A101 RC1} •luk Vl.)C71 V ?.��sf Al+d.-Sw.l Sek.4�I��dR vT7P:1��>di 121 IIJI wwwliy�av,b.lQ1x11171� 7.5' SIDEWALK �5 1 N E p PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 7.5' SIDEWALK 12' LANE 12' LANE tuv `v 11,853�� MAIN ST:RAIL,CORRIDOR-99W -- f MAIN STREET STANDARD CURB WASHINGTON COUNTY AND GUTTER APPROVED BY: GAA SEE RD720 DESIGNED BY. JDW/AMM Ar 24, 9 DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM 70' �'�RY A><FS© NO. TYPICAL SECTION AT-BULB-OUT TYPICAL SECTIONS NO N.T.S. EXPIRES: 12/31/11 8" DIAMETER LOCKING DOME GRATE FINISH GRADE OF PLANTER OVERFLOW ASSEMBLY (SEE SHEET STANDARD (ODOT RD700) OR WIDE (SHEET 2B-2 FOR PIPE CONFIGURATION) 26-4) CURB WITH GUTTER. CONSTRUCT 12" TOE KICKER WIDE CUTS FOR FLOW ENTRANCE (SEE PLAN SEE SHEET GN-14 FOR CURB TYPE AND CURB CUT LOCATIONS) FOR DETAIL WIDTH VARIES UNDISTURBED SOIL SIDEWALK 2.5' MIN 29 - T— -- •:l EXISTING SLOPE VARIES CURB INLET TYPE CG-3 i•. . 12" MIN. a• + ' ��— W/0 GUTTER. NOTE: 6" �6 �.�,•.,; REFER TO ODOT DETAILS SEE TYPICAL STORMWATER PLANTER TALL CURB (SEE DTL _ "� .r . .• SIDEWALK RD371 & RD372 SECTION A-A THIS SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS, ON SHEET 28-4) d''r 1-t�1t1'1,1 �11 �18��'i=1 t "� 4" MATERIALS, AND DETAIL REFERENCES. �� 11t..~✓;=t1t� -� tTOPSOILI� [-2 .itl.- 1. 11 GEOTEXTILE SLOPE AS NECESSARY TO 1�1c f111� -Jlt� "11t";t a MAINTAIN UNDISTURBED 111 FILTER FABRIC r y UNDISTURBED SOIL MIN 0.5% MIN ` `" 12" MIN. 12" MIN WASHED 1 !12" _ M 6 r �- -• , . . y. +. .i•.., e 3I4" DRAIN ROCK `t} �F r ..t nr.. .-.n l',a�, � � x `i�`. •. � � -" ••.y_ �•. , EXISTING SUBGRADE Ml - PIP •. _tll'"111" 111 1�1\ X11 � +; i11�1 11t 111=� 1��1 TO_PS_D1L1 6" PVC PERFORATED PIPE RUNS LENGTH OF d 1D -12 DIAMETER STORM s/4--0" ROCK GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC PLANTER (CONNECT TO CONVEYANCE DRAIN PIPE DEPTH < 5' ''` '`" �> >,-f SYSTEM). PERFORATIONS SHALL BE %2- LOCATION VARIES) PIPE BEDDING a ,• --e° � t ,-. 2 MIN 0.5q MIN DIAMETER HOLES SPACED 6,. ON CENTER WITH AT LEAST TWO ROWS PARALLEL TO AXIS OF PIPE, AT 120' APART 1 nPic L STORM WA TER PLANTER SEC77ON A-A :e•+ i '..i' 8"0 OVERFLOW ASSEMBL Y, SEE TYPICAL STORMWATER ELANTER DETAIL ON SHEET SEC77ON 12-0 2B-2. N.T.S. 6"0 PERFORATED PIPE, PROPOSED SEE NOTE ABOVE STORMWATER CONVEYANCE PIPE % SUBMITTALi 6"0 CLEANOUT, SEE PLANTER A B DETAIL ON SHEET 2B-2. r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION j • ,- ^� PR Harper Houf Peterson Righelfis Inc. 3' TYP. CURB INLET STRUCTURE I I XI F�C�s jRt\��+/"p/}y ]US SEEro1w S,ra Sufk2W PuAad.OY.97102 rh 503271,1, T - G �' N E� MAIN ST,RAIL CORRIDOLIC ROADWAY R w � � w 11 863 AMAIN STREET � �., wasi+lNcroN courm CURB CUT, SEE STEEL WEIR CHECKA B APPROVED BY: GAA DETAILS ON MAIN ST. v _� _ --&W, �E �''��T— — "_��.- " � s��p a^' DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM SHEET 2B-3. 2B-1 FOR DETAIL. 244 DRAFTED BY. JDW/AMM 04R Y ALE S� NO. MCA L STORMWATER PLANTER LAYOUTSTORMWATER PLANTER DETAILS 2B EXPIRES: /31/11 AFI STANDARD (ODOT R0700) OR WIDE CURB FINISH GRADE OF PLANTER WITH GUTTER. (SEE SHEET 2B-4) TOE KICKER SEE SHEET GN--14 TOE KICKER FOR DETAIL 1/4''x10" A588 WEIR SIDEWALK GUTTER ELEVATION TOP OF CURB $ J EXISTING SLOPE VARIES ' TOP OF WEIR °• ' 4. .'d •. 2„ - u a.i... REFER TO TALL f S=Oq .2 , � : •a �' •.1 � „ err _,---".` '�' CURB DETAIL ON1. ! 3 8 —1 2 °. �: SHEET 2B-4 �! �Y�—....I.1 I i.--•�.-I' S i_._.... I_'_ a f •ti.,'r � 1 �' a ,,,{,�• !- ' •r � 1 * - . a, ••' ' e �.__ ; r.,/ !. j; € {.. i_. - �__'. WIDE CURB & GUTTER REFER TO TALL CUR f DETAIL ON SHEET 2B--4. -^ `' `" �' _ ,__,--•_E� '' ,, >� '',;°' +, ,—'� REFER TO DETAILS ON ,• ter' ••� .:. - _.. , ! ' SHEET 28-4. ODOT RD700 A A 1/4"x10" A588 WEIR 2 of 3/4 ROCK PAD UNDER WEIR - - — - - 34" TYP, 34" TYP. SEE PLAN j2AM DETAIL SECTION- A-A ELAN VIEW N.LS. N.T.S, TOE KICKER 3/8-1/2" WIDE SEE SHEET GN-14 TOE KICKER CUT TOP OF TOE KICKER FOR DETAIL TOP OF WEIR OUT WHERE NECESSARY TOP OF CURB FINISH GRADE r /• ' i OF PLANTER MIN:', X , •. ;i,� {SIN. �� , � ;." ,� FINISH GRADESOMITTAl .• . . : W/o OF PLANTER OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' 1/4 h J/l1Harper Hou f Peterso Ri 1Te3Iis Ince \ � •. \_•�. � , ,^� \ ! 1, /�?\ � �O I 'IV� {IkOflrY_.�-Y_INp.lNp.11arfl.l as lwl.LfEYNCwilGlk rFbNYigti-M1_ / - 1r V U) p VaN b w �� , NY x,+a.ex ,aRJ RwA..il bd<Vf2o�;,6e.r>tlltl{Ill Nw.Myrum is)Will 1171 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTSS 1/4;x10 A5 :88 WEIR 11,86 MAIN ST:RAICORRIDOR•99W MAIN STREET _ - I WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM P, 24, DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM DPICAL WEIR CHECK DAM DETAIL �qRy A�ES� NO.ET B—Q DETAILS ��N T� EXP]RES: 12/31 f li 213-1 J. CLEAN OUT PAY ITEMLOCKING DECORATIVE DOME GRATE J. SCREW TYPE PLUG W� PLTCURBETE OVERFLOW ASSEMBLY (8" DIAMETER) CLEANOUT ADAPTER OVERFLOW PAY ITEM RISER (8" DIAMETER) .I2" e, 45' ELBOW (8" DIAMETER) P e 8" x 10" WYE 10" STORM PIPE 8" N PERFORA TED PIPE 1 MAX. s 45' ELBOW '101 _JEF_ 6" PERF PIPE 000000 PROFILE VIEW 10" END CAP OR 6 PERFORATED 8" END CAP EXTEND TO PROPOSED PIPE INLET CONNECT TO MANHOLE OR CURB INLET STRUCTURE CATCH BASIN REDUCER COUPLING PVC WYE 8 NON—PERFORATED COUPLING PIPE o-- CLEANOUT DEVIL N.rs. 6" ROUND POLYOLEFIN GRATE 8" x 10" WYE SLOPE TO DRAIN RISER . NOTE. ADD REDUCERS (8" DIAMETER) PLAN VIEW AS NECESSARY t ) Offffiff DETAIL COMPACTED EARTH "'T 1 VARIES I 6)Y SEWER & % SUBMITTAL DRAIN RISER OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DRAIN BASIN No l/��``p+VCJ. !y{� �/J�a Ilarp+rr Hous Peterson Righellis Inc, �Q�Oi Yi"/►� Yi�G e!![1 Fl.➢ta.Ih/t! •!!)lGl C�Tt ..N[N,f Y[)! •flip Vi tC.�� \ r`h :a!s131l sneea00 lbnlpd ttl['1'1}ni yw.. �SJlflll ww.Y,ry ar.iv.Sn+711 Illi STORM & DRAIN PIPE 3 � MAX COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE IS 4 FT. cPa'� G I N� / PUBLIC ROADWAYIMPROYEMENTS `Y VV 4v 4v 11,863 fi- MAIN ST.RAIL CORRIDOR.99W ' GRATE OR LID MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO c� f MAIN STREET COMPACTED CRUSHED BACKFILLING. WASHINGTON COUNTY STONE BASE 3, o APPROVED BY: GAA �`A 0� DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM r 24fDRAFTED 8Y: JDW/AMM A0SD SHEOET QD GRAD QUAIL. DETAILS M.T.S. EXPIRES: 12/31/11 2B-2 EXPANSION t8"- is" 1' W X 2' L X 4" D JOINT I %2" - 3/4" CRUSHED WASHED ROCK EXPANSION 18" s" 1' W X 2' L X 4" D ° CURB JOINT 1 %2" - 3/N CRUSHED WASHED ROCK ��` IUURB SEE SHEET GN-13 FOR-------- i CURB TOP ENCLOSURE SEE SHEET GN-13 FOR— CURB OR CURB TOP ENCLOSURE . J SP:S �,IN _ ,. c { '- Z1i s^s• 2.5,� , �,. A STREET RELIEF = X ;;�; f� �=1 A STREETb r L� n Y c>y � n 3.0 Z. — -- — — A STREE`� RELIEF �,�Ya(��, 3,u , �� q A _1 1`• :,cit;` -.;c. ( �r.,. `� t> \ LVIDIV" ' \ y V EXPANSION � CURB 1'� � JOINT PLAN EXPANSION " I_ JOINT 1 8" PLANTER BOTTOM PLAN STREET ` -4 s" J 18" I,,- 11 r 1.° SECTION A—A 7" 8" PLANTER BOTTOM PLANTER INLET/CURB CUT WITH % SUtsm1010TAL STREET " �" WIDE CURB AND GUTTER z" " N rs. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Hn1If Peterson Rigl3ellis Inc. �� POfi 111 qrn{{4,0•Ta•>rNt RO •trllO.G,+a +11tn11{GlA .1 UPr{v PR4 . } l I GQQ PR 1D,SY 5�.�.lwLMnlStllle Yat 11wGnl 111t 9>10:iw+°I Y�71LI11I�rM 1AAmm fn}Q4121.11}I ` PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS �U 1 i,$63 ' MAIN STRAILAIN CORRIDOR•99W SECTION A—A WASHINGTON COUNTY (10) APPROVED Sr. GAA B LUT T M ,� DESIGNED BY: JOW/AMM � � � � M A� Zd,�9 DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM STAND-AM QM AND GUM c'�RY A1-ES� No PLANTER INLETICURB CUT DETAILS EXPIRES: 12/31/11 2i3-3 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.t W. RAILING, S££LANDSCAPE SHEET 6N-5 FOR DETAIL. TOE KICKER, SEE 318, RADIUS b" TOP OF WALL LANDSCAPE SHEET PROPOSED J/" RADIUS TOP OF SIDEWALK 3/4^ RADIUS 31,,' GN-14 FOR DETAIL SIDEWALK RADIUS 2X�AtAX 2-14 CONT. 0 TOP PLANTER TOP SURFACE W - = #4 HORIZ. ® 12" 0/C w CLR. 1° EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRADE BA TTER 6:1 i Old OF WAtL i1 #4 VERT. 0 12 0/C CURB NOTM —� 1. REFER TO ODOT RD700 FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES. Ra 3" ,. 18" 18" 12' RADIUS J/s" RADIUS BA TTER 6:1 31t' RADIUS BATTER 6:1 1. CRETF SHALL BE 3003 PSI MIN. (CLASS B), 3-112'SLUMP(MAX.) a 8 2. CURBS ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT OR SIDEWALK TO NAVE EXPANSION ANDIOR CONTRACTION PLANTER TOP JOINTS TO MATCH EXISTING PATTERNS. SURFACE r. 3. 3/8'EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT 45'MAXIMUM SPACING, ON BOTH SIDES OF ` CATCH BASINS, AT CHANGES IN DIRECTION AND AT BRIDGE PANEL JOINTS. 1-1/2"CUT JOINTS 3• MIN. 70 BE PLACED AT 15'MAXIMUM SPACING. I- 4. -'"'4. CURB SHALL BE PLACED ON 3'(MIN.) CRUSHED AGGREGATE(5/s'-0 OR 1-1/4'-0). wBH NOTLS: 5, COMPACT SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATE TO 85%OF MAX DRY DENSITY. 1. REFER TO ODOT R0700 FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES. 2. REFER TO SHEET 2B-1 FOR CURB CUT DETAILS. 8, CURB TO BE BRUSH FINISHED. E +�B Q MR GU Z ALL EXISTING EDGES SHALL BE SAWCUT. tei! MT1 8, INSTALL IY2'0 SLEEVES 30'O.C. IN RETAINING CURB OR IN STREET CURB WHERE NO RETAINING CURB EXISTS. =2E?1<' BETAMG-CURB jQU& Mrs Y2" SCORED CURB 670 I JOIN T 6)! OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •••:`.r'N'�;fy tf'3' ! yf�, � [•ic. RCitry • fFhiiell�is LIkuncrtc+!1..Har1^r HOil 'CtL[xon Rig L ! AV C, USh}1041-Sl—1-.a!>R..>dO92= `,—yo;1 t71. A* m G ; _1t11k_113 1 IJ /� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS • :.'', G �' 2 MAIN ST.RAIL CORRIDOR•99W 11,863 �' •� 8" SIDEWALK >4c t' MAIN STREET BRIDGE/IMPACT WASHINGTON COUNTY PANEL ON APPROVED BY; GAA �r DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM Ar 243�s ,� DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM Mrs. C'QRY A1..-FS� SHEET O CURS DETAILS 2B-4 EXPIRES: 12/31/11 EAS71NG DRIVEWAY - DRIVEWAY- MATCH MDTH GRADE Id1ATCH.yyA7fi 5' DR W AY A SEE N07E 3 R/W LINE o SEE NOTE 3 3 ' 7.5' SIDEWALK 2X MAX SEE NOTE 4 SIDEWALK 8% MAX w 8% MAX SEE NOTE 3 j 7.5' 4 m SEE N07E 4 i SEE NOTE 3-\ Q 2% MAX o 2X MAX 2%f MAX SIDEWALK 'yo LANDSCAPE �i } t--LANDSCAPE 129 MAX o STRIP �. SEE N TE 2 STRIP 0.5' I A DRIVEWAY NOTES., CONSTRUCT TALL SEE NOTE 2-1A CONSTRUCT TALL ODOT ' o TYPE C CONCRETE CURB (TYP.) PER DTL 6' i"-, VARIES CURB (TVP) PER O 5�- WIDTH VARIES D 5, R0700 SEEE THIS SNEE7 1. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3300 PS! AFTER 28 DAYS. DTL 2B-2 SEE TABLE BELOW PLAN 2. CURB JOINT SHALL BE TROWELED K7IN A MIN 1/2" RADIUS ALONG PLANR/W BACK OF CURB. SEE PLAN FOR CURB TYPE. DEPTH VARIES 5, 3. EXPANSION 6c CONTRAC77ON JOINTS SHALL BE 1/2' PRE-MOLDED �7}y PROJECTED TOP OF CURB SEE TABLE BELOW I ASPHALT IMPREGNATED MATERIAL OR EQUAL EXTENDING FROM DEPTH VARIES / SUBGRADE TO FINISH GRADE. PROJECTED TOP OF CURB SEE BELOW �CN y3 SAX 4. 6' X 6" 10 GA MESH REQUIRED FOR ALL DRIVEWAYS. 6' 6"2%MAX 3/4" ___�.` g`b STREET 2% A STREE7 0 I 6' X 5' 10 GA MESH SEE N07E NO. 4 pr o4 �o c+fa t.ri� Y 6' X 6' 10 GA MESH SEE NOTE N0. 4 4" OF AGGREGATE SECTION A-A (3/4'-0) BASE 4' OF AGGREGATE SECTION A--A (3/4"-0) BASE SEE' ODOT R0750 OPTION N FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEE ODOT RD740 OPTION H FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES MQ QjUk AY STN CURE-TIGHT WEN'AiK ffilf WAX 19TH LAPOO PE ASEES CURBS NTS. 4' OF LEVEL 2. N.T.s. 1/2' DENSE HMAC WITH ASPHALT BINDER PG 64-22 COMPACTED TO 91% OF ASTM D 2041 DRIVEWAY DATA TABLEQ w-e- LABEL 12' OF 1-1/2'-0' CRUSHED AGG. BASECOMPACTED TO 95% OF ASTM D 1557tCENTERLINE WDTH (FT) DEPTH (FT) REFERENCE ABOVE DETAIL STA TION & SIDE STANDARD DRIVEWAY K77N COMPACTED SUBGRADE ----«_ / / / DWY 1 2+06.70 LT 16 7.5 (AVG.) CURB-TIGHT SIDEWALK DWY 2 2+41.60 RT 71 (AVG.) 9.5 (AVG.) DRIVEWAY MTH LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND CURBS EMTRIAN PER RFSTORA TIQ t DWY 3 3+39.60 LT 15 16 4 DRIVEWAY WITH LANDSCAPE N Ls. STRIPS AND CURBS DWY 4 3+65.30 RT 18 13.6 DRIVEWAY KITH LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND CURBS DWY 5 4+25.30 RT 16 8.5 STANDARD DRIVEWAY MTH CURB-TIGHT SIDEWALK OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DWY 6 6+32.00 LT 21 16.5 DRIVEWAY KITH LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND CURBS DWY 7 6+74.40 LT 12 16.5 DRIVEWAY WITH LANDSCAPE ^ Harper H.'Lesuf . o'c-orson Itc.....lis Inc. STRIPS AND CURBS ��r_l` I IlOj�n� SUC.0;gii•ui Akl•I Rf .f P4GkrF AfCutltl ti .6uNVii Pi GV l �1 lVl A•S ALYP++*"%1^'tt�'��9T2Uj pborlGl,Y:2.1117 w�P Mlei.w•M 3¢1121.11!1 DWY 8 6+80.20 RT 30 13.5 DRIVEWAY MTH LANDSCAPE T N / PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STRIPS AND CURBS �� E4, Q DRIVEWAY MTH LANDSCAPE tt� 4' 11 863 MAIN ST.RAIL CORRIDOR"99W DWY 9 8+76.70 LT 24 13.5 STRIPS AND CURBS , MAIN STREET DRIVEWAY MTH LANDSCAPE WASHINGTON COUNTY DWY 10 9+79.60 LT 30 16.5 STRIPS AND CURBS L�h4G DRIVEWAY MTH LANDSCAPE APPROVED 8Y: GAA DWY 11 10+42.00 LT 26 14 STRIPS AND CURBS `rFp7 Iq- DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM 2Q' � DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM DRIVEWAY MTH LANDSCAPE DWY 72 11+12.20 L7 24 14.3 STRIPS AND CURBS c�RY A1_ T-22EB-3 o DWY 13 12+43.50 RT 14 17 DRIVEWAY MTH LANDSCAPE _ DRIVEWAY DATA AND DETAILS STRIPS AND CURBS EXPIRES: 5 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. C . O O 3' ] 8' ` ] 3' CONCRETE CURB - id li °° CONCRETE GUTTER SAWCUT ---� 9 P _. c PCC BANDS B } 6 B c SCORE PA TTERN 10' 0.C.. I t " _ DAMS COLOR: SAN DIEGO - � AC; BUFF - N0. 5237. r T _ ti• --_- , . EDGE OF AC/CONCRETE ` " r SEE ABOVE DETAILS FOR TRANSITION PANEL SECTION VIEW. DECOR ATIV , SEE ABOVE DETAILS- ~° I FOR SECTION VIEW. DECORATIVE CROSSWALK CR05SVaLK 2' X 2' SQUARE SCORING RAMP y ' -� PATTERN. DAVIS COLOR: I ` P - M�51Pt ST. P BAND ` a TILE RED - NO. 1117 ` SEE ABOVE DETAILS FOR _ IL SECTION VIEW. TRANSITION 4 TWI A D YE. PANEL CROSSWALK UETAIL r Mrs A .A r ► � � SAWCUT 1'--2' --1' -8' --1' 2' --1' SAWCUT BAND TRANSITION CONCRETE BAND "�- PANEL 2" Y2" REBAR PANEL - 2" 3" 24" O.C. 8" r -�. ` TWO WAYS " 2" • .• . . • _ • '' '� �• _ _ - 3 _ - �„ AC " x 12" STEEL 6" AC SAWCUT 3/ DOWEL BAR, TYP. 77GARD ST,"N ST, -RA- DECORA 771E AC CROSSWALK DETAIL TH "T GRADE CONCRETE CROSSWA K DET lA_L SEC710N B=B kTS u" 0 20 5 �v Mrs STANDARD PCC MIX 60tol-ol SUBMITTAL SAWCUT 1 2 10 1 80 1 TRANSITION RAMP BAND DECORATIVE CONCRETE BAND 8 IX 3" t/2" REBAR 24" O.C. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 8" 2" 5" . Harper Houl"Peterson Righellis Inc. ' , • , , • • �JD PA�FF l4Gf-�tTRS_YL A!!!•f RF ' an QiL SPF A'FCl 11[CIF •FLPYI SOMA • ,• :• [rY I{ 1s352.A +'r1wl,fir TU N'.Jaot tuc 97.ad yN.e 1i01]I IIAI LY<wm 6.1411S111T1 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS it t Y ' t4 w 11,863 �' y MAIN ST:RAIL CORRIDOR•99W 3 WASHINGTON CSTREET �" TY AC x 24" STEEL 12" 9" OF 1 1/2"0 BASEROCK 3 APPROVED BY: GAA DOWEL BAR `rf`pr �pjtD� DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM 24, DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM rO►vrRFTF' pA VFMENT TQ ASPHALT CONCRETE PAMEE MUS77OR Pte. Gf Ry At-F NOET . NI7H RAISED CROSSWALK DETAIL SECTION A-A STREET DETAILS N.rs EXPIRES: 12/9I/11 28-6 SMC t2S AW. NOTE_ 1 POWDER COAT V-10" LINEAR FEET OF BRIDGE RAIL ON LEFT SIDE OF BRIDGE & 85'-4" LINEAR FEET OF BRIDGE RAIL ON RIGHT SIDE OF BRIDGE, INCLUDING THE HORIZONTAL RAILS, THE VER7ICAL RAILS, AND THE BASE PLATT SPACING TYP TS 3x2x.25 POSTS & I" TYP -- A HORIZONTAL RAILS iS 2K?X11 G;1. ENO PCC POST <v , T' y C� TS 2x?xl? GA c SEC77011t A-A EM77NG RAIL DETAIL N.T.S. N.T.S. f L"i" CIA HOLE, TYP VE N T HOLE F .r� !t /- %%6x0-9GA. 60% SUBMITTAL Cl RAKING- _ - � - OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Houf Peterson Rlghellls Inc. EMf•INCCF.9•PLAflNFflW-- L�H�SCAPL ANCY.iTECTb •d Vflvl VLtRS TJ 3x2x•25 `. `V' ,/SIUU 1056[SPoksac Slr.K+,sn.i�ibrll,d OF 97102 Pliore So.i2l lilt nnhtihsmfc.503 111 13 7 1 AY IMPROVEMENTS -- �9-" 4iG �' t PUBLIC��'�'� MAIN S TRAIL CORRIDOR 99W cc, w 11,863 MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY p APPROVED BY: GAA =7MQ BASE PLATE DETAILDESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM N.T.S. ��'�T, 244 �a DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM �qRY ALF S� EXISTING BRIDGE RAIL DETAILS SHEET IX.EXPIRES:_ 12/31/11 STA.4+92.98 TO STA,7+94.66 2B-11 SEC.2 T.2 S,R.1 W. 6" RAISED CONCRETE REFER TO SHEET 4A FOR 2" RAISED CONCRETE WITH FULL PLAN AND SHEET 2B-8 FOR GRADING DETAIL. 2'x2' STAMPED SCORING .., ...E _ ff +51 1 CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE } 1+0 ;.° -- LSLOPE ION ON THIS SHEET. 0 10 20 / • / 4 , 2' A.C. Sc,+�E ,•_ �o PAVEMENT OVERLAY �.�—G+ _ co 6" RAISED v LANDSCAPE AREA c MEMN TREA TMENT - PLAN VIEW -- 1 � Iff . a - j 6" OF 112" MINUS f --- - - I -- A GGREGA TE I 6" RAISED6" RAISED CONCRETE I --� BASE ROCK - — I 3300 PSI CONCRETE LANDSCAPE AREA -- CURB POURED ; - E ADJACENT TO 160 CROSSWAj-K _ .____ ___ 160 21 IK all MOM fmNa EXISTING SECTION A-A GROUNDN.T.S 150 150 CONCRETE 0+00 0+50 2" RAISED 1+00 CROSSWALK +50 CONCRETE � 17 AL MEDIAN TREA_IME� PROFILE WEW OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION V SCALE. 1" = 20; H SCALE. 1" = 10' Harper Houf Peterson R'sghellis 1rtc. E.c if F M A �l♦H II F.t Lr.11di•r'F lN�•=�° t[!? •lU M'f rflt i .v'<'si'f„.4,L.>ufa sL..'aoo 11.JwEqrfat t>ww SOf2)f Iff,L..far•ro�•lof?1i ffn' I N ass/� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS trrG �' 11,BS3 '1' MAIN ST:RAIL CORRIDOR-99W c� MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY j APPROVED BY_ GAA �pT ,{ DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM ti 2AF19� DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM SHEET RY AL PROFILE-MEDIAN TREATMENT NO. EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.4+92.98 TO STA.7+94.88 2B•-12 SEC.ZT.26,R.I W. 7 0-15 1 T REFE)� TO SHEET 2B,-5 FOq—D •ffAILED 0 GRADING PLAN 7 Dwy 16 4 5 75 REFER TO SHEET 2B-6 FOR DETAILED 14',1 b xd' GRADING PLAN 8 3 7 21 TYPN 3 1+00 21 TYP. 6 21 Typ. 48 4 10 48 6u-/* SUBM117AL ir OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper flouf Peterson Righellis Inc. r-b FIR PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS MAIN ST:RAIL CORRIDOR-99W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM 10 2DG, 24' DRAFTED BY. JDW/AMM 0Y AJ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION UCTION PLAN NO. SCALE: 1'= 20' EXPIRES: 12 STA.0+00 TO STA.1+90 3A SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.I W. OffiS7RUQ77CW NOTES: 1� CONST. CURB AND GUTTER. (SEE DRG. NO. RD700) CONST. MODIFIED 16" WIDE CURB AND 18" WIDE GUTTER. (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-4) O CONST. STANDARD CURB. (SEE DRG. NO. RD700) CONST. MODIFIED STANDARD CURB, TALL (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-4) CONST. 4" P.C. CONC. SIDEWALK (SEE DRG. NO RD720) CONST. P.C. CONC. SIDEWALK RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE (SEE DRG. NOS. RD755 & RD759) 7� CONST. REINFORCED P.C. CONC. DRIVEWAY. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 26-5) (SEE DRG. NOS. RD750) $) CONST. P.C. CONC, CROSSWALK TRANS177ON PANEL. (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 10 MATCH NEW CURB INTO EXTG. CURB AND/OR MATCH NEW SIDEWALK INTO EXTG. SIDEWALK AS SHOWN. 14 INST. 2" LEVEL 3, 1/2 INCH DENSE MHMAC MIXTURE. (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 15 COLD PLANE PAVEMENT REMOVAL, 0 — 2" . (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 16 CONST P.C. CONC. CROSSWALK. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 20 EXTG. BRIDGE IMPACT PANEL. INSTALL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT IN HMAC/PCC. SEAL WITH CRACK SEAL. 21 CONST. 12" WIDE CONC. CURB CUT. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 26-3) ¢$ PROTECT EXTG. SIDEWALK. POWER WASH ADJACENT PRIVATE PCC WALKWAY. 67 PROTECT EXTG. LANDSCAPE AREA. 72 MATCH EXTG. PRIVATE WALKWAY/PAVING, POWER WASH ADJACENT PRIVATE PCC WALKWAY. 75 CONST. MODIFIED CURB, 2' WIDE X 8" DEEP CONC. BAND (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-12) 70 CONSTRUCT HMAC DRIVEWAY TRANSITION. 60% SUBMITTAL OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION h Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. IIOF�� t-G,n1,Ti.1.1111 oTRi..•nn -1211111 1fcin •suevl•ass 7Yi tE sills+.Su..�.Saix A1U 11ndu+�.OR ti711:2 v��vn.-$031211111 vn.x.AFssw::f�Y 1N::11111 v PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 4? 11,863 ��' MAIN ST,RAIL CORRIDOR-99W MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY WA liq APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM pT 24,1DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM GgRY A�FSS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SHO T EXPIRES: 12/31/1] STA.1+90 TO STA.4+93 4 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. REFER TO SHEET ,# T]GARD CYCLE 'F� ' I 2B-8R DETAILED 12551 DOUBLE J CACNE'; 76 GRADIfG�PLAN > y i 1 � PIPER S PLACE .._.. 12549 WEf LI AC2' �NC9�RAVES LABS 4 12571 WY 1254975Ivy— 4 72 4} 10 1 7 Q) - - _ ' '. .. i ._...-. , w 1 _" �r.. , 7•r .www.w ... r r w„t-r 1� - .+ p ..i ` r r .•-r••rr:.;w,.+�'�J-iir:�. --}.,r+-•----.e".,... .w ` '3c...•- 48 ' 15 14YF- 21 T 5 15 rrr r..ww.w w.w+�4`a"L w sem... .�.wr w rr.w •w ' .r �.s� r ' jj, / l,__ .j-.. �2 SD MAIN 75 y' II TSP. � v• 4+00 F i 3+170 16 21 r WY -- C 15 14 1 21 P. 7 1 I 2 21 TYP. 48 - t WY 15 14 �r— t F --_-'. __. ...._. r _. =ry _ w + r..waw,fir- .►•`. �- """" ..._�_ • Y 6 72 4 j 72 REFER TO SHEET 76 2B-10 FOR DETAILED KARATE; i MAX S BREW PUB .--'"'� BRIDGE GRADING PLAN PRO DESIGN SOLUTIONS 12566_ 12662 . — 21 rYP. t } 12568 r - ,{ I 48 6 —__ - WY .......w ..w_,s.w \, 71- t _ REFER TO SHEET 3 ` 28-7 FOR DETAILED '. '" •. - ..�1 ; ' �`sl GRADING PLAN F-1 a ,t OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. { a ka PROF i�,a,u,P=pr•r,t.vntQx .arn cc yr c ,+•rtx .�xvcare aut�i s;..tw»3ew1xwu2Ja 11 z ..� ; , Y i N E�ssf0 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS w � � RAIL CORRIDOR-99W 4MAIN ST: ssa10 MAIN STREET MAPLEWOOD DR `*�' WASHINGTON COUNTY (PRIVATE) 4$ - ,� 1 x 0 10 20 e. d APPROVED BY: GAA r, DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM i' �! ! - •'• r t SCALE: 1'= 20• ,O 24, �1 DRAFTED BY; JDW/AMM Al F S GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN SNO T STA,1+90 TO STA.4+93 4A EXPIRES: 12/3]/11 SEC.2,T.2 Sy R.1 W. MTRUC77ON NOTES;. 1 CONST. CURB AND GUTTER. (SEE DRG. NO. RD700) 2 CONST. MODIFIED 18" WIDE CURB AND 18" WIDE GUTTER. (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 28-4) CONST, STANDARD CURB. (SEE DRG. NO. RD700) CONST, MODIFIED STANDARD CURB, TALL (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-4) CONSTT, P.C. CONC, SIDEWALK RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE. (SEE DRG. NOS. R0755 & RD759) CONST. REINFORCED P.C. CONC. DRIVEWAY. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-5) (SEE DRG. NOS. RD750) $ CONST. P.C. CONC. CROSSWALK TRANSITION PANEL. (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 10 MATCH NEW CURB INTO EXTG. CURB AND/OR MATCH NEW SIDEWALK INTO EXTG. SIDEWALK AS SHOWN. 14 INST. 2" LEVEL 3, 1/2 INCH DENSE MHMAC MIXTURE (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 15 COLD PLANE PAVEMENT REMOVAL, 0 — 2" . (FDR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 16 CONST. P.C. CONC. CROSSWALK. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 20 EXTG. BRIDGE IMPACT PANEL. INSTALL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT IN HMAC/PCC. SEAL WITH XCRACK SEAL. 21 CONST. 12" WIDE CONC. CURB CUT. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B--3) 48 PROTECT EXTG. SIDEWALK, POWER WASH ADJACENT PRIVATE PCC WALKWAY. O$ PROTECT EXTG, STAIRS AND RETAINING CURB. 71 RECONST. STEP. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B—X) 72 MATCH EXTG, PRIVATE WALKWAY/PAVING. POWER WASH ADJACENT PRIVATE PCC WALKWAY. 7� CONSTRUCT HMAC DRIVEWAY TRANSITION. 77 CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAIL. 78 CONSTRUCT MONOLITHIC CURB AND SIDEWALK ON TOP OF BRIDGE AND IMPACT PANEL. (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 2B-4) OG gp CONSTRUCT RETAINING CURB PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2B--4 AND GRADING PLAN ON SHEET 2B-9. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. � f M1G.NI[Pk.kt.IfNt PO •1PN04G al`i �PGNf it ill •?UN V[•O ki Lf/fI/[' :U}3C SrvInK$IIKL SwP`•171 1bIY•.4SM'9770)pWwc klYJl 11)I wwk.Yp.s.w.A+iU,5,2]l llil 1 N / PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS l MAIN ST; AIL CTR ET RIDOR-99W WASHINGTON COUNTY LIMO1p APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM 24, DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM GARY SHEET A`�50 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES N 1�IxEs: lz/31/11 STA.4+93 TO STA.7+95 5 REFER TO SHEET SEC.2,T.2&,FLlW. 213-9 FOR DETAILED GRADING PLAN AUTOM05E DRIVETRAINCLEANERS KEPLERS PERMA—TREA T TIGARD 72 8 72 12519 MILLERS 12525 72 UPHOLSTERY SLEM A TASTE OF HEAVE 1253-31 80 12511 54 10 10 1253 0 77 2,� 4 '71 12535 cK —---------- 47, oil TP T 68 : 1 r 10 4 SD 7 21T 1 Typ. _w .....------ .-r...,• . . ., x . _,> MAIN ST. .0 TYP. 115 '14 7+00 6+00 5+00 + —4— 2 6 16 21 TYP. 78 48 fr 10 v 7 i, 2 Tr 3 10 4 4 72 72 48 UO POWELL PAINT CENTER s. —BOY A 12540 12550 48 72 0 0/ A REFER TO SHEET JOS UB M ITTAL 2B-10 FOR DETAILED BRIDGE GRADING PLAN OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Hamer Houf Peteison Righell is,Inc.,, I A%of ofANC/111. c I I I... G N4 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 11,863 'Lty, MAIN ST-RAILN CORRIDOR-99W NWSTREET WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVED BY: GAA DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM 24* DRAFTED BY; JDW/AMM GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN SHEET NO. SCALE: 1 20' 5A EXPIRES: :12:/:Sl STA.4+93 TO STA.7495 SEC.2,t2S,R.1W. CONSTRU IOM NOTES:- CONST CURB AND GUTTER. (SEE DRG. NO. RD700) CONST. MODIFIED 18" WIDE CURB AND 18" WIDE GUTTER. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-4) 3 CONST. STANDARD CURB. (SEE DRG. NO, RD700) CONST. MODIFIED STANDARD CURB, TALL (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 28-4) CONSTT, 4" P.C. CONC. SIDEWALK (SEE DRG. NO RD720) CONST. P.C. CONC. SIDEWALK RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE. (SEE DRG. NOS. RD755 & RD759) CONST. REINFORCED P.C. CONC. DRIVEWAY (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-5) (SEE DRG. NOS. RD750) CONST P.C. CONC. CROSSWALK TRANSITION PANEL. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 28-6) 10 MATCH NEW CURB INTO EXTG. CURB AND/OR MATCH NEW SIDEWALK INTO EXTG, SIDEWALK AS SHOWN. 14 INST. 2" LEVEL 3, 1/2 INCH DENSE MHMAC MIXTURE. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 15 COLD PLANE PAVEMENT REMOVAL, 0 — 2" . (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 16 CONSTT, P.C. CONC. CROSSWALK. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 21 CONST. 12" WIDE CONC. CURB CUT. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 28-3) ¢$ PROTECT EXTG. SIDEWALK. POWER WASH ADJACENT PRIVATE PCC WALKWAY, 67 PROTECT EXTG. LANDSCAPE AREA. 71 RECONST STEP. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B—X) 72 MATCH EXTG. PRIVATE WALKWAY/PAVING. POWER WASH ADJACENT PRIVATE PCC WALKWAY. % OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION }� Hammer Hnuf Peterson RighelI is Inc. V��D 7 �O�` t.;cNrrrs• .+�r,a®e •txxce[ani+acw.rkc=a •SL..YIQNS ]tif$F 5r•ila..SurH.�W.. Iwniwt WI Pf,•pv',nre 194I3k.11Y1.Mal4.a.H to iq5?I 1731 G 1 w i 1,81?3 ,r' ASRALCORDON 4MN . IL RIR W MAIN STREET g WASHINGTON COUNTY F€ APPROVED BY: GAA fF �� DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM pr 24.�9 DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM A�jSO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SHEET z�rn>xl;s: 12/31/11 STA.7+95 TO STA.10+97 6 SEC.2,t2S,R.1 W. KISS CAR WASH 5 72 Dwy 67 4 71 SUB-SHOP TYLER'S AUTOMOTIVE67 4 12475 4 3 12511 12485 wy I 7 7: 4 1 4'. _7 _114 TYF� SI) t DIVY I -2 -STO 3 Typ. �w3 15 w t su SD 77 21 TYP, (D TYP. Typ. Std2 ( 3 ) 6.j, • 6 72 5 5 5 4 10 67 A 72 ___. , I__ ., 48 AB 33 COMPUTER TUALA TIN VALLEY GLASS LIQUOR S & 1 460 SKILLS PLUS POWELL PAINT 12500 12490 10 10 12448 CENTER @ 72 12540 67 Tot 60670' SUBMITTAL. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HaT�rHqufPetll Ri&IIis Inc. PR193 j4f%,-k—sid M NPSisi nW Up q2.v foo—M3 131 IM I N PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .1 21 tVG w 11,863 MAIN ST:RAIL CORRIDOR-99W MAIN STREET SCALE: 1"- 20' WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVED BY: GAA ESQ 4b,v DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM AT 24, DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM cgRy Ao GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN SNOT EXPIRES, 12/31 STA.7+96 TO STA,10+97 6A SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. CONSTRUC770 u NOS;, al CONST. CURB AND GUTTER. (SEE DRG. NO. RD700) 2� CONST. MODIFIED 18" WIDE CURB AND 18" WIDE GUTTER. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-4) CONST. STANDARD CURB. (SEE DRG. NO. RD700) CONST MODIFIED STANDARD CURB, TALL (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-4) CONST. 4" P.C. CONC. SIDEWALK (SEE DRG. NO RD720) CONST. P.C. CONC. SIDEWALK RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE. (SEE DRG. NOS. RD755 & R0759) CONSTT, REINFORCED P.C. CONIC DRIVEWAY. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-5) (SEE DRG. NOS, RD750) CONST. P.C. CONIC. CROSSWALK TRANSITION PANEL. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 1 Q MATCH NEW CURB INTO EXTG. CURB AND/OR MATCH NEW SIDEWALK INTO EXTG. SIDEWALK AS SHOWN. 14 INST. 2" LEVEL 3, 1/2 INCH DENSE MHMAC MIXTURE. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 15 COLD PLANE PAVEMENT REMOVAL, 0 - 2" . (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEETS 2A) 16 CONST. P.C. CONC. CROSSWALK. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 17 CONSTT, RAISED P.C. CONC. CROSSWALK. (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-6) 21 CONST. 12" WIDE CONC. CURB CUT (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET 2B-3) 37 PROTECT EXTG. FIRE HYDRANT. 3$ PROTECT EXTG. WATER METER, 61 PROTECT EXTG. STRUCTURE. 67 PROTECT EXTG. LANDSCAPE AREA. 72 MATCH EXTG. PRIVATE WALKWAY/PAVING. POWER WASH ADJACENT PRIVATE PCC WALKWAY. 60% SUBMITTAL OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION � OF Har er Nou£Peterson Righellis Inc_. ._- (/G.)lfiR'..Pl 1� LAB .4YiG'IL}P!}'.Lll�t.tii •6vPV,VC-Aa W 64.1Pn1+t ikNLl.xM:W Ibnlaal Ike 47,n1 1i1"""1U}==11111 MMw I�Fl+.byt 1.v M11-21.1111 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 11,863 MAIN ST;RAIL CORRIDOR-WW �' MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY EGO APPROVED BY: GAA F g� DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM Ar 24, ' �1 DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM c4RY Al-F`'� GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SHEET STA.10+97 TO STA.14+00 7 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. -=1 ►' •� �,j ; STA. 13+77.60 ENO 't+ A : . 2" COLD PLANE AW, 2" OVERLAY TIGARD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC ►_ ;1 ' 1 '�• ! 'i 1 SNERRlE'S JEWELRY BOX �' 12405 k3 ;c,'�a TIGARD AREA CHAMBER r i OF COMMERCE i 12425 /J•L 72 61 P ¢ 3 > ',! '�1``- , t1: `,',, +. 5 12345 7,Lw •i w--•"F=;-}4 * c .,4.4 �,•, '�,,.t,.` • i L f •'� �l.. I t'"L�••.---: �,< i-^-4� t •1 f`s—_ � ...._-� -V•- �-.n`;r'�fw, '�S �. 10 wr I Ta 11 40 1,}�f.`� S.,t t - - l - .....ri ~ir:..1+.t..f r`. i � C6 7 'V��1r1.sr,,Y " '`1j ~4 ..• f V!. �.I3. • w�`,•:i}p. e.+ o.• ' f .-�Ioo ';'•.♦)..�'-:�<%,.`i fz•.,.'��i"{x•;.•�...r34i< 6 •�,.,-i 1��._-+r .:1.�_a`r{•s..� ,�` �"� ', ..� -- ., G��r- -._t, ti > __Z•_ ..•'.�` - - --�' �°'�� ..� .T_ .r r.._ �as_ ...._ .r..._ ..._ _.-o _ � � -- rr ,t , s • rr _ 14 10 �~ v 3 2 i , I 1 TYP. �° . r ••o � ! 'i r . L�UAJ r— MAIN 11+ PCC MEDIAN 12+00 •,! ' l 4 TYP. � •; 1 . �> - ��3�37'8t� ESD;_ 21 TYP. 4 14 15 4 ,i 1 '' a ~ ' • r 2" COLDPLANEAND`.1 21 TYP. .�' i• `-A —._ �2"_OYER ,�Y. ..�;'= ... _ - 1 mar .._ —a _ . .� � --•-• - - - jam. �_..� __ _�'.--- __.___ . ..::...._....,_,-_ _,.....,._....:-.__. .•.:.__:-. .--... _.: •'•��- - - w_� ��,. _ Tom,..,' :—'-- _ >',_. .' "'t!•� r'�a ^•- ... .._. --. : _S'.� SC'-;i.., .j", �.' _ ..�::.�._��': i^.`..=.'�""",_'Y*'-"''--�. F tTt.�' ♦• -moi, `Rw�is�� ... -- .. --- '}• t3^, s.. .. :Z.��-•iF"�'.Y.-;'S�t._-a•.:J-.._-:��"^yL:%_' - .f^. •} .. I �.•...L� ..._ _- i. I1r Ind _ �.., _ 1. _ }-' •�. .1.:=.__ _ -.- i •S_ ..rfx.'•.,'�..�. -:'=,`Y-:t�,`_"':_Y�w>�."�.^ .-:Ili ,j. •*�._ :r. - =t' t}. _ ..F .. ; ,_.:....+ ?`moi^..,.• ...Tr. �i_ ,=t;'---=a.:_...�:"': ,.Z;.L.^" is ELWA _ .:..s. STUDIO: � _ 123 GA TA TION i:.si"{7p,�'1-N�i7�E: :-• �•�1 , "" f i r •tis•1 x ' -`...i'x.. �k' �,>✓, t _ r '•L* �� I �D�L LE .C1 t r• :1 ,� 1l a a:� `-_cr; , ._. r' ;;? _7L _ M '�� ; , 12370 SAI.bIV 72 �i2�4 t =:~`I l._. ._ ; CAFE ALLEGRO 5, 72 ¢ ,. 12442 . ! 72 -Mx={�a FIRST�B;�INK OF TIGARD 72 MUS!S ON MAIN D ' 1 72 12386 • ; :_:. 12420 12400 - •tti r�_._. _. .._,. i 67 67 REFER TO SHEET 0 28-•7 FOR DETAILED GRADING PLAN OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Hout Peterson Righellis Inc. �G �D PR Fs f o e zc �t�r�'��►� rm�su Ffj•N.a s•wnanaa,xf`ku6•mLikOfa—M aLroll frt la •cVhfymf mIIF ;- PUBLIC 11,80MAIS:RAIL SCALE 1• - 20 ' MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVED BY: GAA SFA 9$� DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM 24•i DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM C,gRY ALFca4 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN SHEET EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA,10+97 TO STA,14+00 7 A SEG.2,L 2 S,IL 1 W. St de t. r 0 ► ,/ 4Q1+00cy '�f EXISTING ` "�+ ► .; TREE CANOPY, z TYP. O / ► w SITE FURNISHINGS m %/0ZSUBMITTAL 33 STREET TREE GRATE Q OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <0 ir 20 BENCH 3 Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. y� ^� I ` ST,� lhL Si�[Rit•_�S�I.h4/�6 •Il.r�4hCA.T—_.�__lC nlif Ct'i .A4n'.l IS* 3 .!1 fX Sm)c+>ua�fw.N'!Iv„wd.OF 4728:1�"•Sp3Y)1 11)4.ww vs*rw 1�.Nt1T)i t1T1 Fy PU9UC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS c ►4 BIKE RACK 3 a 410 s MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) -t PRELIMINARY MAIN STREET WasHiHGroN courmr C ' t+11Cf0"."GO N�tiL1� APPROVED BY; GAA f DESIGNED BY- JDW CD __ 14 TOE KICK Ilt3jr�84( ��.,>,. r �y 1 DRAFTED BY: JbW N tl� v w 04P.6 PLANTING PLAN sNO. 2 SEE SHEET GN-11 FOR PLANTING LEGEND GN-6 a STA.0+00 TO STA. z _ SEC.2,T.2 1 W. 1 Mo 1F1ED 80 LARDS t 4 )z SD 0 S� MAIN ST. 3+00 4+00 SITE FURNISHINGS 33 STREET TREE GRATE 1 2 3 Io ® 20 BENCH -� OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (} 14 BIKE RACK 3 isTE Hamer Houf Peterson fthellis Inc. t1 r is LL� rt,.S— T. AI .d. ..A..&01-50 A1011 hhPl—f-.FlOtle 3115 SE diprk.�-Sl�sel Suite 300 P•xliand.Ok 7)]013iwx'Sf9311113i mvw'Mpsan Gc SU3.:7i Illi o s 20 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS i „1 ■� 14 TDE Kl CK 1 MAIN ST.JOHNSON ST-TIGAAD ST MG ) SCALE: ,• WAS = 2D' «____,.__ _r PRELIMINARY MAIN STREET �.y FiIHf'TON COUNTY MICIIAT-1 UHRIEN SEE SHEET GN--11 FOR PLANTING LEGEND ralzt:or�rl APPftDVED BY: GAA I�rJIISi$ RESIGNED BY: JDW DRAFTED BY: JDW 0p RY ET PLANTING PLAN SNO. jk STA.1+90 TO STA.4+93 GN-7 SEC.2 3 2 Sy R.1 W. ippp tils � � ti ► ► ► + �Sis a � • 0 0 00 0 ---- MAIN ST. 1 6+00 7+00 5+00 _ .. — — - - — — ----- MJ 3 .: D? ^,, ... .::'�-! .....�.—.�_.....__,.-......_ »-..,... ..vr-`"i �sF. .w..� ,w.�,m,.tay� —•—�,.�+w.wnwmaw .+�+W....r.+.w. I r ' ` *• R 1 MODIFIED y BOLLARD . f 1.4 D U Sl 7F FURNISHINGS 0 co 33 STREET TREE GRATE ? 2 czfn yo SUBMITTAL © ® 20 BENCH OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4 r o 14 BIKE RACK 3 ��'' Harper Ho uf Peterson Rigl�ellis Inc. �� 7nliFt�A.et X5. A..•rµa1•naac..r AAL'H.tl[i3 .iur_tiGiE u!;0,4-1., Sw1<20J fUn1.aJ,0A 92DZ rh: 2.%3.221101.xr Y6ry a••♦n 3031II 1M 4? 0 io zo PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS i 410 a MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(TIGARD) sGALE f= 20' 14 TOE KICK 1 PRELIMINARY MAIN STREET co -------- —1 WASHINGTON COUNTY wW AIAI71'O'BRI!N Q APPROVED BY: GAA 9 (3R6GC3N ANTING LEGEND DESIGNED BY: JQW Q9 SEE SHEET GN-11 FOR PLt testa QRAF7ED BY: JDW �� PLANTING PLAN SNOT 'o STA.4+93 TO STA,7+95 GN-8 >w a z SEC.2 T.2 S.,R.1 W. SUB—SHOP TYLER'S AUTOMOTIVE KISS CAR WASH 12511 12485 ___ 12475 N", MAIN ST 10+00 - 9+00 _ ------ 8+00 �r t POWELL PAINT TUALA77N VALLEY GLASS LIQUOR S DRE � A8 33 COMPUTER CENTER ( 12500 12490 111 460 SKILLS PLUS 12540 12448 SITE FURNISHINGS 33 STREET TREE GRATE t 2 z`Q f f %!0 SUBMITTAL ® 20 BENCH 3 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION r �r TW H er Houf Peterson Ri hellis Inc. n ,} BIKE �{r^ y1 W� ------ 4 E R S $ 1, 14 BIKE RACK tN01rv.GHS�j .200P EFS •LAN pMm:PE SRCu 1E'hhp A150)2211D 7u1 7035E Spnlenc Slrtr,$4itc 1JJ Ppnlont OR 97]02 pbm:303]]1 II]S uvw hAp euu fn<i63.22111)1 CL �o :a r PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 410 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) SCALE: 3'= 24' REET 14 TOE KICK 1 tPRELIMINARY # c H WASHINGTON COUNTY 1 MICIIAI:L OMEN APPROVED BY: GAA L)IiEG()11 DESIGNED BY: JDW SEE SHEET GN-11 FOR PLANTING LEGEND iIi'Iiys DRAFTED BY: JDW C4pE A�- PLANTING PLAN NO T STA,7+95 TO STA.10+97 GN-9 11+QO I STs 33 ©D --- �---- _:_ —- -- _. _...____._�:x.4`4 tel 0 12+00 _r._r,._—_ _-__rr. - CD o co 3k E U SITE FURNISHINGS r` l.I.l w Qs, 33 STREET TREE GRATE �? Z t t)uO/t cb 20 BENCH 3 OREGON DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION Q 0 T Harper Houf Peterson Righeliis Inc. 4r (D � ^f_.GahSf Ab_�4•Nf,dld .t#NOpQ'.#ff #iLH,1liQ .QVnY Y50hL 14 BIKE RACK o so io -� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS w s 410 s MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) SCALE: ,•- 20' P R E L i j�I N A R E-� MAIN STREET 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY .rn.rr..__ 14 TOE KICK -� to MiC11AF101IMN APPROVED 6Y: GAA UhliGDN � DESIGNED BY: JDW 0 �=- SEE SHEET GN-11 FOR PLANTING LEGEND 11r3�fvs DRAFTED BY., JDw 4 PLANTING PLAN SHEET U ;? A STA.10+97 TO STA.14+00 GN-10 a z PL ANL YIQIEQM TREES 1 2 1 2 -, -i ,10 , GROUNDCOVER f3� EXISTNG TREE TO BE RETAINED � } 2554 Juncos patens 'Elk Blue' — Elk Blue Gray Rush / Em 1 GAL 12 O.C. 32 Acer latanoides 'Crimson Sentry' — Crimson Sentry Maple not on list 15 Carex 'Ice Dance' — Ice Dance Sedge 2 CAL SPACING AS SHOWN, B&B, HEADED AT 6'—0 ! GAL + 24 !J C. 0 Befula lacquemontli — Jac uemonfii Birch not on list 2' CAL SPACING AS SHOWN, B&B, HEADED AT B'—O R', 8 Corex oshimensis '£ver old' — Varie ated Ja onese Sedge 1 GAL 24 O.C. SHRUBS 3 Carex testaceo — Oron a New Zealand Sedge -» 1 GAL 24 0.0 85 Nandino domestico 'Fire ower' — Firepower Heavenly Bamboo 19 Fra oris chiloensis — Beach Strowberr ® 5 GAL 30 O.C., FULL PLANTS 4 PO 12" 0.C. 11 Corex elato 'Aures' — Bowles Golden Sedge Rubus cal cinoides — Crinkler—leaf Creeper 5 GAL 30' O.C., FULL PLANTS 4 PO 24 O.C. 23 Cornus sericea 'Kelse i' — KelseyDogwood =rNi�mmxm_ 26 Pennisetum oto ecuroides Hameln — Dwarf Fountain Grass 5 GAL 30 O.C., FULL PLANTS 5 GAL 18 O.C., FULL PLANTS ® 0 Pennisetum olo ecuroides 'Moudr ' — Block Fountain Gross 5 GAL 18' D.C., FULL PLANTS 7 Berberis thunber ii 'Crimson Pim ' — Dwarf Jo onese Barberry 5 GAL 30 O.C., FULL PLANTS ® 3 flex qlabro "Chomm — Nordfc Dworf Inkberr 5 GAL 36' O.C., FULL PLANTS, Fruitless Males 1 Miscanthus sinensis 'Adis o' — Dwarf Maiden Gross �f� SUBMITTAL 5 GAL 36 O.C., FULL PLANTS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 19 S iraeo a onica 'Goldflame' — Goldflame S irea 5 GAL 36 O.C., FULL PLANTST t.�CIN\ 1111atper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. it l A 111 k ..A U UALA,I AktM Ili Ctk .IVRYI V.X/ 203 NY p'W2enc —1,3,4,200PciMd OR 912(Q rA—,50312131}1 a.lu,uva f W3YI 1171 I I PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ® 4 Cornus sericea Farrow -- Artfc Fire Dogwood • 41� ® MAIN ST.JOHNSON ST-TiGARp ST(T1GARp) 5 GAL 36 O.C., FULL PLANTS L I MAIN STREET WASHINGTON cDUNW 3 Iris dou losiana — Pacific Coast Iris HybridAPPROVED BY: GAA Gorr a1� ( ] 11/3 1 GAL 24' 0.C. 1/98 DESIGNED BY: JDW DRAFTED 6Y; JDW CiQ4P.E X PLANTING LEGEND SHEET GN-11 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (2) 114 9 PERIMETER 3" CLEAR FROM TOP OF SLAB --- #4 CONTINUOUS (4) SIDES & EDGE OF TREE WELL A . . TREE GRATE FRAME � 0'�' ( A=) ' e • a :• ADJACENT SIDEWALK e —�— TREE GRATE FRAME GRATE BOLT,. •--.��--- ,,_ ._ ,�� < R ' `•• „ 4'x6' CAST IRON TREE GRATE 4x6' IRON TREE ., .4 CLEAR GRATE PER SPECT FICA TIONS • #3 REBAR EMBED TOP OF MULCH . - s •, I (SEE sEcrloN) _ _ EMBEDDED 5" — #4 @ 18 0.C. 'I I I=I I��I I --I I • = STREET SIDE 6" CURB 3" CLEAR ELECTRICAL PORT TREE GRATE � TREE GRATE P PLAN 3 1 Section PERIMETER FRAME C�j Z ADJACENT SIDEWALK 25-20 UCC S.S. BUTTON HEAD SCREW t6 CONCRETE CURB CAST IRON TRENCH GRATE C> PER SPECIFICATIONS / GRATE F 1/4" X 112- X 1" GRINDING g12 5/8" - — PADS FOR FINAL LEVELING 0 12 1/8I —► ° , TRENCH GRATE FRAME —1 1/4" X 1 1/4" X 1/4" STEEL ANGLE GRATE BOLT GRA TE FA S TEN ER may= A • ' ' • ` 1/2" X 2" NELSON STUD PLAN • • ` °• C/) - 10 1/8" SHOP WELDED % SUBMITTAL TO FRAME. (24" O.C. TYP.) )NvOd6�OC.�Sr'i 0 p t� .C. . 4 • n o 0 bm r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Har er HoufPetersan Itigl�ellis Inc. :0410 ST i-�_4 .itER�GRATE BOLT �� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS® MAIN ST,JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST{f IGARD) MAIN STREff TRENCH GRATE w�"'"�'N�U"� Q APPROVED BY: GAA t� 3 Section oxoozv F-^ 11/3[l�8 DESIGNED BY: JDW DRAFTED BY: JDW LANDSCAPE DETAILS NET o GN-12 a z ADJACENT SIDEWALK VARIES — SES.PLAN --�--I . 1 4" THICK CAST IRON GRATE e qa a CURB e ° 40 STREET SIDE CURB4 4 AL1GNa ° CAST IRON GRATE o" 4 ` �°� INQ MA 01 STORMWATER PLANTER (BELOW) J 3/$,'� CURB CUT r � STREET SIDE FINISH GRADE . aoRE � � � � � EDGE OF CURB (BELOW) fA STREET SIDE CURB PEDESTRIAN GRA TE AT CURB CUTS 4e �®� Section ��r�o 1 -J3 GRATE FRAME — 14714"X4"STEEL ANGLE zN STREET w CURB GRATE' 80L PEDESTRIAN GRA TE ADJACENT 1 �" THICK CAST IRON GRATE SIDEWALK VARIES — SEE PLAN -- Plan CURB CUT a STREET / PARKING A / IX 4 a 4. SUBMITTAL . .. L° � '•.i � lik-lik / SE T.2 1 W. �.f• 53 58 END STRIPE ' END STRIPE 55 / STA. 1+78.27 ' t STA.,2,:(b6.75 y 55 END STRIPE STA. 0+18f r END STRIPE f END STRIPE STA. 0+20f r o io za STA. 0+17f r / 14.4U' SCALE 1` = 20 / - - 51 12.00' 55 57 X24 5857 1.00' 12.00 t • � 1.00' ' -.••� J. 0 -r 52 54 TYP 13.5' NorF 0 � r � ,� � 20.00' Rx SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SIGNING DETAILS. 58 _ $,p' SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FLASHER SIGN INFORMATION. --4 �---� --� LX12 Rx22 58 SIQWM jAND STRIPING NOTES SIGNING 51 INST. 8" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W-2) AND 4" YELLOW 81—DIRECTIONAL TYPE NINSTALL NEW SIGN (N) ON NEW (M) SIGN SUPPORT N = SIGN NUMBER -/o UBMITTAL 1 REFLECTORS (W-2/R-20). (SEE DRG. NOS. TM500 &TM502) REMOVE AND SAVE EXISTING SIGN M = MATERIAL (12 GA. „ EXN MAINTAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING SIGN (N) AND SUPPORT GAL V. PERFORATED STEEL) 52 60 INST. 4 DOUBLE YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (D) AND 4 YELLOW REMOVE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BI—DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1 REFLECTORS (D/R-40). (SEE DRG. NOS. TM500 &TMRSN 502) harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. REMOVE AND SAVE EXIS71NO SIGN (N) AND (M) SIGN SUPPORT AA� o m sf a[C.f.•oyy yw ( .,M#" .0) 1A l I.l 1,* • (.,wu pp= rU X�>SS FMwamn 6wxka hxlw ctlf o»e,r►.w:n iiai«.,«ue�.,�n.w�:n iii 53 INST 12" THERMOPLASTIC TYPE B—HS CROSSWALK STRIPE. RIN REINSTALL EXIS77NG SIGN (N) G Y N� /O PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS G w 11,863 MAIN ST:RAIL CORRIDOR•99W 54 INST. 4" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W). (SEE DRG. NO. TM500) RJN REINSTALL EXISTING SIGN (N) AND (M) SIGN SUPPORT f MAIN STREET !M WASHINGTON COUNTY 55 INST. ELONGATED ARROW (E—LA). (SEE DRG. NO. TM501) ® REMOVE EXISTING SIGN (N) AND (M) SIGN SUPPORT APPROVED BY: GAA �E"�p �ry DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM @ PAINT CURB YELLOW. NOTES: 24.19 DRAFTED BY: JOW/AMM 1, THE LOCATIONS OF SIGN INSTALLA77ONS SHOWN ARE APPROX. WITH EXACT LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. CgRY AI-FS� SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN No 58 PROTECT EXTG. SIGN. 2. EXISTING SIGNS NOT SHOWN ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNLESS EXPIRES: 12/81/11 �l STA.0+00 TO STA.1+90 S OTHERMSE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEC.Z,T.2 S.,R.1 W. REMOVE CITY OF TIGARD CYCLE j TIGARD BANNER AND 12551 WEI U ACCUPUNCTURE --``r - PIPERS PLACE DOUBLE J CACHE 12575 ` J _ SUPPORT AVES LABS 12549 /1 !` _ 12549 12571 s Y ♦ y . ♦ S, r' �.. • .� l ` ice, - _ 2.76' l ' 9' TYP. 51 2' 52 � I I ZT. 54 TYP 3+0b 12.00' 4+00 74 .. �, 57 12.00' S4 TYP � 1� REMOVE CITY ST. TYP 54 LIGHTING PROJECT SIGN -- 3 p i°` , _ r " l l � Yw REMOVE CITY OF TIGARD f -- �� 58 BANNER AND SUPPORT RXJ 05 PRO DESIGN SOLUTIONS KAP MAX'S BREW PUB 12568 56fi 12562 — � UN 148 R160 10 20 REMOVE ONEWA Y -4.gj PRIVATE SIGN NOZE SCALE: 1" 20' SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SIGNING DETAILS. Q AND SMEM \ SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN INST. 8" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W-2) AND FLASHER SIGN INFORMATION. 60 a7 SUBMITTAL 4" YELLOW BI-DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1 REFLECTORS ' (W-2R-20). (SEE DRG. NOS TU500 &TM502) OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 52 INST 4" DOUBLE YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (D) Har eP r Houf Peterson R h I is Inc__ _ a AND 4" YELLOW 81-DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1 REFLECTORS p Ppr ""<<� i ♦FloiL.�k . Lr„ .. . �p ,oa 1 � �" p1�k S{.�..�.�Y.tl Swn 49P N.,GW 11k 9TJk2 pbo..!u1171 If)1+..kq.wn N.XU s11 (D/R-40)• (SEE DRG. NOS. TM500 &TM502) g�� G t x'v �/ PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS t V� w� 11,7363 MAIN ST.RAIL CORRIDOR-99W '09 �/ 54 INST. 4" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W). (SEE r MAINSTR '01 / � WAS}iINGrON COUNTY DRG. NO. TM500) APPROVED BY: GAA Q PROTECT EXTG. SIGN. �FA� 1°��ry DESIGNED BY. JDW/AMM i 5B 24. DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM / RY A0 74 INST• SHARROW (WHITE) MARKING (SNR) (FOR cQ SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN SHEET DETAILS, SEE SHEET S-5) I;x ES: 12/31/11 STA.1+90 TO STA,4+98 S-1 SEC.z,T.2 S.,R.1 W. REMOVE WELCOME TO DOWNTOWN TIGARD SIGN & LIGHTED CROSSWALK REINSTALL SIGN AND SUPPORT FANNO CK. SIGN SEE LIGHTING PL FOR INFORMATION REMOVE CITY OF HILLERS EMBLEM A TASTE OF HEAVEN AUTOM077VE DRIVETRAIN PERMA—TREAT TIGARD CLEANERS KEPLERS 7 7_71 TIGARD BANNER 12537 12535 12533 12525 12519 UPHOLSTERY 12511 _�SUI�POF?T _ I ,T .S•`Mr ''t r_T _.�..,1, �a�` r r o d byr % s ?� 52 54 T'YP T. 3 54 r — — 74 —_ + - - _ �f�o - - - _ �• - }--- +oar— _ 3 i RS2 RS4 F REMOVE CITY OF r j r• 7' TYP, E a > TIGARD BANER AND SUPPORT -" r .. . . r • . • o.t • -s 1 Y• • i 1 j. a - 1 ' mµ'_1') 7 ._ '_ ." •. .._,._. _ _ l[ ' ''' 58 - rl I - C) 1E] SIGN POWELL PAINT CENTER =: r A—BOY 12550 12540 o ,o 20 SIGNM AND STRIPING NOTES U01E T SCALE: 7'>" 20' SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SIGNING DETAILS. 52 INST 4" DOUBLE YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (D) AND 4" YELLOW SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN % Bl—DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1 REFLECTORS (DI )R-40 . (SEE DRG. NOS. TM500 FLASHER SIGN INFORMATION. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION &TM502) 54 INST. 4" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W). (SEE DRG. NO. TM500) //// %ry�R /� `/�' H er.HoI I Peterson Ri�h�Ilis Incl CIIG 1111[.f[.1�I.MITI o! •tR116tia0t at CNltt[i •%Y.A1f Y3S.lt C``1,. 2l1 C3.Kry4•.f?�st}YIk�I jwli.d INt 91jOJ lka.ki5:21.111�aa4 L{a r.rw k.lal;j ll'f6- 58 PROTECT EXTG. SIGN. $ G 1 N E� /p PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS w w 11,863 MAIN ST:RAIL CORRIDOR-99W 74 INST SHARROW (WHITE) MARKING (SHR) (FOR DETAILS, SEE SHEET S-5) MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY p APPROVED BY: GAA sFA 9�ti DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM r 24% DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM �qRY A0 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN SNO, EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.4+93 TO STA,7+95 S-2 REMOVE CITY OF TIGARD BANNER AND SUPPORT SU13—SHOP REMOVE CITY OF TIGARD 58 TYLER'S AUTOMOTIVE KISS CAR WASH Rx4 12511 BANNER AND SUPPORT 12485 58X1 12475 -, S. •q�{.. .�- "X,_i .fy. ._ r :v' .* _ . • s.'i. .4 s - y,' .0 : s- �a, . , 7' T . 7'4 45' q. I 2 At 2.75' } - 1 Kly RIB S, REMOVE WELCOME TO I �� j - DOWNTOWN TIGARD BANNER E: 54 IYP 12.72 �— 4 52 9+00 1 ' 52 19.00' T 8+00 ` 74 54 -TYP , P 7 TY . '1 3.00' # l 1.00' 1.00 a11 R16 } t t Aa .� ° _ �� • , __ '* _,_._. fir~ '' t _ ; '" '�,. • .. . i r Yr R11 X22 • Y' ` <' }' m COMPUTER LAB 33 SKILLS PLUS 12460 12448 REMOVE CITY OF TIGARD BANNER AND SUPPORT RJ6 POWELL PAINT TUALA77N VALLEY GLASS LIQUOR S DRE CENTER 12500 12490 12540 p 10 20 SIGNING AND STRIPING NQ= NOTE SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SIGNING DETAILS. SCALE: 1'= 20' 52 INST 4" DOUBLE YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (D) AND SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN "70 4" YELLOW BI—DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1 REFLECTORS (D/R-40). FLASHER SIGN INFORMATION. (SEE DRG. NOS. TM500 &TM502) r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 54 INST 4" WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W). (SEE DRG. NO, �� Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. ��O (-wlY.elfEep.Ti A41tI h tnOf L $m i101 tti0. .AV.vl)110 \v/ Yn 17.}„q.}.rri.5rn'tS+MnWd Ilk 9701,A'wr 14.7JI.fS.0�xMAlg.m.ln l+'12Z1 IS31 TM500) ��(, c� 5 � t N E / PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 58 PROTECT EX TG. SIGN. �G 11,863 ' MAIN ST.SIN CORRIDOR•99W STTREET 74 INST. SHARROW (WHITE) MARKING (SHR) (FOR DETAILS, SEE WASHINGTON COUNTY WON APPROVED BY: GAA SHEET S-5) `rE`p 9OR, DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM T 24.1 DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM cOY ALFf'o SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN SNO T EXPIRES: 12/31/11 ^] STA.7+95 TO STA,10+97 5— SEC.2,T.2 S.,IL 1 W.TIGARD ST., RE—STRIPE TIGARD ST. 100' NW OF INTERSEC77ON Re 51 SHERRIE'S JEWELRY BOX TIGARD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC ' 12425 12405 1 58G j l � F - TIGARD AREA CHAMBER REMOVE CITY OF '+ TI GARD BANNER �`�"`•- �3.._�" �' � OF COMMERCE 0 so so AND SUPPORT j 12345 scan: i•= so' 58 IV .. a; ' r - • - .. - +.- � r' ,r ! ,'r • 'c o s r ' •r e- . : TYP 73 REMOVE NO 7_00 #� I 57 54 J L PARKING SIGN 52 i 1, NIS 54 TYP — 11.00 STRIPE STA. 11+00! 11+1-4;14 _. . 54 rY.l?. .--- _�T. _ _....... - -- -Y— — — -' _ �.._._ 11-3-00 t 5fi 300 START STRIPE RgMOVE CITY OF STA. 11+89.09 IGARD BANNER — AND SUPPORT —� 51 55 11.00' 55 { a i 54 7.00' � TYP .. a... _._ -... EL Al It ST_U !0 '' z T •� -- — LL GRO 12380 A MLLE STATION D CAFE A E 1 I � FlR�� 8 �VK OF 7)GARD MUS! S ON A!N SA 022fl 12400 12386 12370 l REMOVE NO PARKING AND CITY ST. LIGHTING PROJECT T� SIQMGt ANQ S7RIPING N07U SIGNS AND SUPPORT 51 INST• 8" WHITE-THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W-2) AND 56 /NST, RAILROAD CROSSING LEGEND. (SEE DRG. NO. 8f 4" YELLOW B!—DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1 REFLECTORS TM501) / (W-2/R-20). (SEE DRG. NOS. TM500 &TM502) 57 PAINT CURB YELLOW. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DOUBLE YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE D P rJZ INST. 4 D ( } Huper Hot�f Peterson Ri hellis Inc. AND 4" YELLOW BI--DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1 REFLECTORS 58 PROTECT EXTG. SIGN. �� FIR) z�ae , !*iaa .mjrjw5othlilt„�r=. !IUINNW 5%R k�+M1�KH Y.�r 7(b h+do�A xlq v7W1,i C yp}at lilt.,`w etq.twn tr•wl::,tiri (D/R-40). (SEE DRG. NOS. TM500 &TM502) 73 /NST. 1' WHITE THERMOPLASTIC SPEED HUMP STRIPE �5�� i �►� /� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (SH—A). (SEE ODOT DETAIL 4560 �c,� 4' .11,063 MAIN ST.RAIL CORRIDOR-99W 54 INST. 4” WHITE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE (W). (SEE ) �" MAIN STREET WAS1iINGTON COUNTY � DRG. NO. TM500) �n� l.�G.�.ih APPROVED BY: GAA aa�as �'�p +� DESIGNED BY: JDW/AMM SEE SHEET S-5 FOR SIGNING DETAILS. t �g 55 INST. ELONGATED ARROW (E—LA), (SEE DRG NO, Z4, � DRAFTED BY: JDW/AMM SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN C,q S� SHEET TM501 FLASHER SIGN INFORMATION. RY A0 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN NO. i EXPIRES: 12/si/1I STA.10+97 TO STA.14+00 S-41 PEDESTRIAN FLASHER PLAN MAIN STREET AT STA 5'30 Pole No. 2 PP PB s� $2 (CITY OF TIGARD) Sia. 5.25 1 <4__9 SJ St 5+00 SW MAIN STREET 6+00 $� s3 r —7 r T' -1 _ ._.. ._. PP PB Pole No. 1 SIC. 5.36 'UTILITIES NOT SHOWM CONTRACTOR F4 CONTACT Urll fY '�ND; COKPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS O Install pedestrian signal pedestal with frangible base IT OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION itwall pedestrlon push button with accessibleSuU Da P9 pedestrian pusttitton assembly and InstrLctlon sign, [} /� � ASS�OC kites 1400 SW fegan 9720,-5502 00 Telsphane.(503)243-3500 PUstl�Itton to be field Vertfled. See detall sheet f t!l! TIANSPOVATtOY •/LYTI10M1 PO�anf,Oregon972015502 FeK (503)243.1934 SG-02 and the Special Provisions for Molls. ��I Nr� Install rectangular rapid flosting he=n ossewbty. � F, 53M4 � PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ® See detail sheet SO-04 and the Special Prolslons MAIN 8T3 JOHNSON 8T - TIGARD ST (TIGARD) for details. MAIN STREET SIM WASHINGTON COUNTY Install (36'x36') Pedestrian Sign (W110. See site NOTESN DESIGNED s Y: m. i.o i �A„m By error.._._Dd'(17_3M_L6Z_ Q SG-02 for sign instollotlon detalls, y o`� A E A iE N c o t Y: D. s.e k D n 617._2ad.ZE.S-Dwns. SC — i, See Sheet SG-02 for pedestrian ,,,,/a foundation, DRAWN B Y: D N CAD 4 �4-——_—— ,{'�,yI lastall (24-x12') Left Arrow Sign X16 7P). See signs, and pushbutton details. —— ——————__ O sheet SG-02 for sign installation details. k. B F-C -----------_ -_———_ PEDESTRIAN PLAINER PLAN — ss Install (24'x12-) Riglf Arrow Sign (Wl6-7P1. See SCALE 1 FEET 4qI EXPIRES:DEC. 31, 2X)1 1 =SG sheet SG-02 for sign lnstallatlon detalls. 0 10 20 30 40 �•D• — =Min XAProjects=10)IP10082-000(Tigard Main Street Imps)1ACAD1 SG-03.dwg PEDESTRIAN FLASHER DETAILS Top mount Metalic pole cap solar panel Top mount 45Wsalar panel, MAIN STREET AT STA 5-30 Angle as directed by (CITY OF TIGARD) 3k manUfactrirer. Side mount solar panel Side mount 45W solar panel. Angle as directed by Stainless steel"U"bolt 24" manufacturer. Flasherlbattery cabinet "Stainless steel"U"bolt 1-1 Flasher/battery cabinet Wireless communication device for 24a pushbutton communications Attach 24 per manufacturer instructions: 1"Stainless s feel"U"bolt/ 19" PU6fi6 �a.5°c Sign WII-Z(rwo signs required) 7 3/4" BUTTON TO =o.5°c TURN ON l0.5"c Stainless Stec/clamp and WARNING 0,u'c bracket(See ODOT Std 51° Dwg. rM677for details) See sheet 56 for 36"x36"W11-2 LLIGHTS -0.51,c 2 Rectangular rapid flashing sign location details RIO-25 (MOd,) beacon assemblies,I facing 5'x7,75' each direction of traffic wMal required on poles Manufacturer to provide Rectangular Rapid flashing Beacon assemblies. mounting bar Each RRFB shall be a minimum of approx.5" 3" wide x 2"high .Stainless steel clamp and 3" Sign W16-7PL or sign W16-7PR bracket(see ODGT Std. See Sheet S6 for 24°x12"W16-7P ,?4'W2'(Two signs required} Dwg. TM677 for de tails) (L or R)sign location details 12" Accessible pedestrian signal Pedestrian Crossing Flashing Beacon Notes, pushbutton w/R10-25 Mod Accessible Ped.Pushbutton w/RIO-25 Mad sign sign installation See Sign installation(See details on this sheet) 1 pedestryan Crossing control system to be supplied by agreen sheet listed ( g 4 Dio,x Ib'Length std. de tails on this sheee) galvanizedsteelPipe ' manufacturer under Schaal onedAttitartedSolar Flashing Beacon (ASTM A53,Sch.40) Systems"(incl,solar panel and mount,control system and cabinet,push 4"Dia.Std.Ga(vanrzed Steel Prpe buttons and mount,wireless communications devices,etc.} System shall (ASTM A53,Sch,40} include amber strobe beacons with clear lenses Refer to ODOTGreen 84" Sheets for approved rectangular rapid flashing beacon system equipment 42" Aluminum Pole Collar Frangible Pose 30 Lb.Building Paper Gasket (Cast Aluminum) �' (s Hand Hale OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION Avvue.Sus� jt[�r/JCC " S--`"'''w PRDl Ff TR RTA7160 1619719N9 PQorham,Drfegon 97201-55025� Faxephone:=}243-934 Ground Rod c1 N f f 1'1 53,044�4P' PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS MAIN IT, JOHNSON ST - TIGARD 8T ITIQARDI VAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY N DESIGNED BY: M. L..1 Concrete Faundation (Place v9 �rV REVIEWED BY: D. 9rok.1lh In One Pour} Foundation to 10 DRWN 9 Y: D K S CAD bedesignedpervehkle If CRY 15, \ FC:091 Kr, 9.44 signal edestal faundai On, k. EG o0ostd.Dwg. TM457. PEDESTRIAN FLASHER PLAN SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW EXPiKES:DEC. ��, 2o,i DETAILS SG-2 .D.ka _____ Ili MC N0. X:1Projects12010tP10082-000 (Tigard Main Street Imps)1ACAD1 SG-04.dwg Agenda Item 6 Downtown Public Art Subcommitte proposed members Name CCAC commissioners Alexander Craghead Alice Ellis Gaut Elise Shearer, CCAC vice chair Downtown business owners Sherrie Devaney Sherrie's Jewelry Box Brett Vinsant Live Laugh Love Glass artist Susan Gallacher-Turner local artist additional member? non-voting Council/CCDA Liason Marland Henderson, City Councilor staff Sean Farrelly consultant/coordinator Valerie Otani CITY OF TIGARD: DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY—STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS I. BACKGROUND The City of Tigard commissioned a parking study to examine the Figure A:Study Area and Downtown current parking situation in the downtown in 2010. The study Supply was conducted by DKS Associates and analyzed use, occupancy and demand for customer and employee spaces throughout the fig.-I oow,o. downtown.' TigarEg as ofJ 1m emory 5 Exime�survw 3 � Subsequent to the DKS study,the City determined that °,a"�"eZ�`• /• v.nme 9w nv.mory , . _ _ development of a parking management strategy and plan for °°° °� • . -_ the core area of the downtown would be beneficial as a guide to W ,Z daily management and as a template for future decision- _P L z=-> making. To this end, the City engaged Rick Williams Consulting ® to assist in development of such a plan. The consultant's assignment was to work with the City and downtown stakeholders to compile a complete,simple and C effective set of operating strategies for management of the City's downtown parking supply, with particular near tern emphasis on Main Street. Plan development was the result of six meetings with downtown stakeholders. Stakeholders were integral to re- shaping the parking system to meet future needs, assure the downtown's continued vitality, and enhance community livability. II. THE ROLE OF PARKING IN DOWNTOWN The role of parking in downtown cannot be seen as a stand-alone solution in and of itself. The key to a successful downtown is truly the land uses that comprise it. A vital downtown is an area that has a clear sense of place and identity, comprised of an exciting and attractive mix of uses and amenities. In a nutshell, "people do not come downtown to park." People come downtown to experience an environment that is unique, active and diverse. As such,the true role of parking is to assure that the desired vision for downtown is fully supported. Through the stakeholder process and discussion, it was determined that several outcomes for parking management were desired. These can be summarized by the following responses to the question of "parking management in downtown Tigard should": 'See, Tigard Main Street Improvements, Downtown Parking Existing Conditions Analysis, DKS Associates,Technical Memorandum, and(November 4,2010). • Support a "messy vitality"- creating a vital, active and interesting downtown environment • Slow down traffic through the Main Street corridor • Assure convenient and available parking for visitors and customers • Provide reasonable and safe parking for employees and long-term visits • Communicate a clear sense of movement to parking options • Provide for an integrated system on and off-street (parking& pedestrians) • Integrate alternative modes (particularly biking for Tigard) • Ensure that parking in district is for users of the district—mitigate park& ride Parking is just one tool in a downtown's economic development toolbox. Parking must be managed to assure that priority land uses are supported with an effective and efficient system of access that caters to the needs of priority users. In the case of Tigard,the priority user for the City owned system of parking has been identified as the short-term trip,the person who shops,visits or recreates. As the Parking Work Group (PWG) concluded,the objective of parking management in downtown should be: To develop and implement a responsive and effective parking management plan for Downtown Tigard to maximize the parking supply and strategically support the development of a vibrant, growing and attractive destination for shopping, working, living, recreating and entertainment. III. ORGANIZATION OF PLAN The outline of parking management strategies outlined below is intended as an initial start of discussions with the City of Tigard and affected downtown stakeholders on policies and actions necessary to support a vital and growing downtown main street over time. The plan begins with a stated set of Guiding Themes and Principles. The Guiding Themes and Principles are designed to guide and inform decision-making on issues related to access and parking management in the downtown. The can also serve as a framework for decision making for parking adjacent to the Main Street corridor, particularly as demand increases over time and management of parking expands outward from the Main Street corridor. Strategically, the principles encourage the use of parking resources to support economic development goals and effectively serve the diversity of "customers" using the downtown. The Guiding Principles outlined here area summarized under theme categories and will serve as a foundation for continuing discussions with stakeholders and the community. Ideally, these Guiding Principles will establish a basis for consensus, giving direction to near- and long-term decisions for parking management and access strategies in the downtown. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule Following the Guiding Themes and Principles, recommended parking management strategies are laid out in a manner that is iterative or"checklist" in presentation, in that actions are intended to follow a logical progression of implementation, with each preceding action providing the ground work necessary to move to a subsequent action. Actions are also delineated between policy actions and operations, categorized into specific "phases"that range from immediate to long-term. Overall,the implementation schedule is intended to be logical and ordered in a manner that responds to changes in demand and ensures a continuing sense that downtown is customer friendly, easy to use and understand. Though not overly complex,the plan will require a basic level of support, coordination, commitment and resource identification that goes beyond what is currently in place. As City and downtown partners consider the adequacy of the strategies themselves, discussion of the "who, how and what" of implementation will be essential to bring the partners to a point where initiation of the plan is triggered. IV. GUIDING THEMES AND PRINCIPLES The overall objective for implementing the recommended policy and strategy actions is to improve the efficiency of the system and the customer experience. It is the goal of the partners to facilitate improvements in the following theme areas. A. Coordination ✓ Centralize management of the public parking supply within the City of Tigard and assure a representative body of affected private and public constituents from within the downtown routinely informs decision-making (e.g., a coordinated relationship with a new downtown business association). 1% Publicly owned parking in the on-and off-street supply needs to be managed in a coordinated manner. Decision-making should be coordinated through a central management structure informed by a representative body of private and public constituents from within the downtown. In Tigard,this could entail designation of a single point of contact within the City and routine work with a downtown stakeholder committee, preferably affiliated with a downtown business association. The finite nature of on-street parking necessitates strategic integration of parking decisions to facilitate a seamless, recognizable and convenient transition of future growth into off-street facilities. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule ✓ Implement measurements and reporting that ensures Guiding Principles are supported and achieved. Committing to a routine and objective system of measurement and reporting assures that decision-making will be informed. This also provides a basis for routine evaluation of program effectiveness. ✓ Manage the public parking supply using the "85%Rule"to inform and guide decision- making. The "85%Rule"is an operating principle and industry based management tool for coordinating a parking supply. When occupancies routinely reach 85%in the peak hour, more intensive and aggressive parking management strategies are called for to assist patrons in finding available parking. The "85% Rule" standard will facilitate the City and the community in making reasonable and effective decisions regarding time stays, enforcement and other decisions related to capacity management. B. Priority Customer ✓ Recognize that on-street parking is a finite resource and should be managed to assure maximum access for the priority customerNo. All users of the downtown favor on-street parking. The parking management plan recognizes this premium on-street parking resource needs to be managed to provide a rate of customer/patron turnover that supports downtown vitality. With this principle comes the recognition that growth in downtown parking demand will, over the longer term, need to be accommodated in off-street locations. Longer-term patron and employee parking must be managed so as not to conflict with customer parking, particularly on-street. On-street parking must be managed according to demand and time-stays conducive to customer need. ✓ Reserve the most convenient on-street parking spaces to support the priority customer, the short-term trip. The on-street parking system in the downtown must be formatted in a manner that assures turnover and minimized conflicts between the priority visitor (stays of 2 hours or less) and other users. C. Efficiency and Balance ✓ Provide sufficient parking to meet employee demand, in conjunction with an access system that provides balanced and reasonable travel mode options. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule All parking strategies should be coordinated with transportation demand management goals and objectives to ensure that employees and customers have reasonable options available for access. For Tigard, this should be initiated with efforts to encourage bicycling to the downtown,with longer term goals for transit and ridesharing. ✓ Encourage/intent shared parking in areas where parking is underutilized. Private parking facilities in some downtown locations have underutilized capacity. Efforts should be made to facilitate shared use agreements between different users (public and private)to direct parking demand into these facilities to maximize existing parking resources. It D. Intuitive& High Quality ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. Parking resources should be clearly identified and explained through branding, signage, wayfinding and user information, increasing customer, employee and resident understanding ¢' ' of how to access the downtown's on-and off-street parking resources � ✓ Provide an "access product"that is of the highest quality to create a safe and positive customer experience with parking and access associated with the downtown. Example: McMinnville,OR On-street parking should be uniformly managed and enforced to assure an intuitive, reasonable sense of the allowed time stay. Off-street facilities (surface and structured) should be of uniform quality and identity to create a clear sense of safety, convenience, understandability and coordination with the pedestrian environment. High quality communication and marketing materials should be integrated into a comprehensive package of services to inform and guide the parking public into the on- and off-street parking system. ✓ Provide safe,secure and well-lit parking to allow a sense of security at all times on street and off-street. 7; Each public off-street lot shall be adequately maintained so as to not deter potential users based on poor design, lot pavement quality or perceived security issues. Safe and well-lit links between parking areas and shopping and work sites should be planned for and provided. Lot Design:Springfield,OR Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule ✓ The City's public information system should provide a clear and consistent message about auto parking,preferably under a common brand. There should be a resource for information on parking 5 SOMER Fj and how it is managed and accessed that is attainable 4.5 by any prospective user of the downtown. This could e �' be coordinated through a public/private partnership S between the City and a downtown business association. A common brand that unifies marketing materials, signage systems and other pertinent communications both simplifies and streamlines Branding:Gresham,OR customer recognition and use of the system. V. RECOMMENDED DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES As a result of the previous data collection effort and analysis, as well as continuing discussions with the City and stakeholders, specific parking management strategies have been identified and are recommended for consideration. Recommendations for changes in current policy/code and several near-term strategies (Phase 1)will optimize the efficiency of the existing parking inventory in Downtown Tigard. Additional mid-and longer-term strategies (Phases 2 & 3) are also recommended for consideration. The strategies recommended in this report are designed to assist the City to more effectively manage its downtown parking supply. `i These recommendations are organized as follows: 4r • Policy Level Actions • Recommended Parking Management Strategies: Phases 1—3 A summary of all recommended Actions and Strategies is attached as an Implementation Schedule at the end of this report. = A. POLICY LEVEL ACTIONS(Immediate Implementation) The following policy elements have been included to ensure the goals of the parking management plan can be achieved by incorporating parking system management into the City's development policy. Application of the 85 percent occupancy standard as the threshold for decision-making becomes the unifying monitoring device connecting these various policy elements. Formalizing the policy recommendations assures that the life of the parking management plan extends beyond the first round of strategy implementation. As such, it is recommended that the Policy Recommendations be adopted immediately by the City of Tigard. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule 1. Adopt Guiding Themes& Principles as formal policies for downtown access within the transportation code. The Guiding Principles provide a framework for managing parking and decision making in the downtown over time. "Codifying" the Guiding Principles by incorporating them into the Comprehensive Plan will serve to inform future management decision-making as well as development of future public facilities. Incorporating these principles into City Code and policy assures the intent and purpose for parking management, established through this study, is carried out over time. 2. Adopt the 85% Rule as the optimum occupancy standard for measuring performance of the parking supply and "triggering"specific management strategies and rate ranges. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Manage the public parking supply using the 85% Rule to inform and guide decision-making. ✓ Recognize that on-street parking is a finite resource and should be managed to assure maximum access for the priority customer. ✓ Implement measurements and reporting that assures Guiding Principles are supported and achieved. The 85% Rule is a measure of parking utilization that acts as a benchmark against which parking management decisions are based. Within the parking industry, it is assumed that when an inventory of parking exceeds 85%occupancy in the peak hour, the supply becomes constrained and may not provide full and convenient access to its intended user. Once a supply of parking routinely exceeds 85% occupancy in the peak hour, the 85% Rule would require that parking management strategies be evaluated and/or implemented to bring peak hour occupancies to a level below 85%to assure intended uses are conveniently accommodated. The parking inventory for Tigard revealed that existing peak hour occupancies within the core are currently less than 85%. Having the 85% Rule formalized in policy will assure that a process for evaluating and responding to future parking activity is in place. 3. Assign/designate a centralized point of contact or lead staff to serve as downtown Parking Coordinator Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Centralize management of the public parking supply within the City of Tigard and assure a representative body of affected private and public constituents from within the downtown routinely informs decision-making(e.g., a coordinated relationship with a new downtown business association). Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule The complexity of parking and access will increase as the City and the downtown grows through redevelopment and increased demand for access. A single person should be assigned to oversee and manage all aspects of the program associated with parking in the downtown, providing the community a single reference point for parking management. This person will also be responsible for transitioning strategies developed as a part of this plan for downtown as demand for parking increases overtime. This position could be developed as a coordinated relationship with a downtown business association if one were to form in downtown Tigard. Ideally,this person would staff a representative stakeholder group (see below)to routinely review overall parking activity in the downtown as well as by district. Information developed through periodic update of the parking inventory(i.e. 85% Rule) would be used to evaluate "action triggers" and implement appropriate adopted strategies as necessary. WL,."k 4. Routinely review downtown parking issues with the City Center Advisory Commission Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Centralize management of the public parking supply within the City of Tigard and assure a representative body of affected private and public constituents from within the downtown routinely informs decision-making(e.g., a coordinated relationship with a new downtown business association). AW ✓ Provide an "access product" that is of the highest quality to create a safe and positive customer experience with parking and access associated with the downtown. The City should develop a process through which a representative cross-section of downtown interests routinely assist the Parking Manager/Coordinator in the review and on-going implementation of the Parking Management Plan. The purpose would be to provide routine oversight and continued input from stakeholders in the on-going management and assessment of the parking system. Over time this could become a function of a relationship with a downtown business association. 0 5. Clarify and define "exception" criteria and process for loading zones and "non-standard" on-street parking stalls. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Recognize that on-street parking is a finite resource and should be managed to assure maximum access for the priority customer. ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. This Plan recommends that all on-street parking along the Main Street corridor be designated as 2- Hour parking as a base standard (see Strategy 8, below). This is predicated on 2010 DKS Associates study findings that indicate the majority of"customers" in the downtown stay an average of 1 hour Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard ; Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule and 15 minutes . As such, 15 minute, 30-minute and 60 minute time stays do not allow adequate time for a customer trip. Similarly,time stays in excess of 2-hours are most likely being used by employees. Given this, all other types of on-street parking that differ from the 2-hour base standard (e.g., loading zones, 15, 30, 60, all day, etc.) would be considered "exceptions" and would have to be requested by an affected business or property owner. It is recommended that the Parking Coordinator and City Center Advisory Commission establish criteria for exceptions as well as a process for requesting exceptions. It is also recommended that once specific criteria are established that the City Manager would be empowered with administrative authority to approve/deny requests based on input from the Parking Coordinator and City Center Advisory Commission. Criteria and process should consider the following. a. Handicapped/disabled access b. 15 -60 minute zones 1. Specific criteria for approval (i.e., by specific business type). 2. Specific locations (i.e., end of block versus mid-block). 3. Number per geographic area (i.e., shared by users in a particular area). C. Loading zones 1. Maximum number per block face(s). 2. Limitation on number per geographic area (e.g., no more than one for every three continuous block faces). 3. Evaluation of opportunities for shared loading and customer parking.2 B. PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES(OPERATIONS)—RECOMMENDED FOR IMPLEMENTATION 6. Complete Main Street Streetscape Improvement project Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. ✓ Provide an "access product" that is of the highest quality to create a safe and positive customer experience with parking and access associated with the downtown. z "Combination Loading Zones" have been used in other jurisdictions allowing loading during specific periods of the day (e.g., 6:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.), then convert to short-term parking during all other time periods. Such zones, if successfully managed, can increase overall short-term supply. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard • Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule The Main Street Streetscape Improvement Project provides a number of '°1O"` "11O'°4 significant upgrades to ��am :M 1 sidewalks, streetscape F amenities, lighting and landscaping along Main , I� Street. The upgrades also \ include a new layout and j 1 design for the on-street r C+y1iE I N' )-Ir 9.MD RMnc PA*AU y rmsic f fY-WO tl•AF4f PAO" •an LAWS IMorC RN T�I LP[N/ parking system that includes angled parking and restriping rftMX of stalls. The policies and strategies recommending the parking management plan augment these improvements with recommendations for signage, wayfinding and management. 7. Re-stripe all on-street parking in the Main Street study zone. All "downtown"on-street parking should be clearly striped. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Provide a "parking product" in the downtown that is of the highest quality to create a safe and positive customer experience with parking and the downtown. ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. Much of the on-street parking in downtown study area is striped. Striping is effective because it assists the customer in identifying a parking stall,thereby creating a sense of order and convenience. Effective striping also reduces incidents of damage to vehicles and facilitates compliance. However,the recent inventory of parking revealed that in many areas the striping is faded and difficult to discern. Also, adjacent streets paralleling the downtown are not striped which can be confusing to customers who see the stripes as an indication of where they can or cannot park. As such, it is recommended that the City re-stripe all on-street stalls in the commercial area of downtown, implementing a "policy"that requires a striped stall wherever parking is allowed on-street in the downtown. 8. Standardize all on-street parking on Main Street to 2 Hour parking. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Recognize that on-street parking is a finite resource and should be managed to assure maximum access for the priority customer. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. ✓ The City's public information system should provide a clear and consistent message about auto parking. Multiple time stay designations in a downtown are often confusing to customers, particularly very short-term stalls (e.g., 15, 30 and 60 minute stalls) that do not provide an adequate amount of time for a typical customer visit. Implementing this strategy will provide (a) customer oriented parking stalls, (b) ease of understanding and (c) consistency in the Main Street area.. 9. Provide for a 3 Hour or by Permit standard for on-street parking adjacent to the Main Street corridor.Coordinate this standard with Strategies 10, 11 and 17 below. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. Several of the side streets crossing Main Street are underutilized and can provide a longer term stay opportunity for customers needing more than 2 hours for their visit. This strategy maximizes use of underutilized on street parking adjacent to the Main Street corridor and encourages employees to park in areas that are not adverse to the need for street level parking turnover. Initiation of this strategy could begin with adjacent side streets signed at 10 hours, transitioning to 3 and or by permit as demand for customer parking increases. 10. Coordinate new parking signage design with the Downtown Pedestrian and Wayfinding Project. Submit service package for new right of way signage per on-street changes in 8 above and 9 above. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ON STREET SIGNAGE ZONE A ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. 2 HOUR 3 HOUR ✓ Reserve the most convenient on-street parking spaces to support 8AM•5PM =ONES SAM•5PM the priority customer,the short-term trip. =t OFF STREET SIGNAGE Right-of-way informational signage will need to be developed to ON STREET PARK provide replacement signage as per changes recommended here. A DIRECTIONAL SIGNTO FREE IFF STREET LOT service package will need to be developed and presented to City 30x36 managers and/or City Council for approval. 11. Replace all current on-street time zone signage with new signage package. Implements 10, above. Improves customer awareness of parking option and supports priority parking Guiding Principle. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule 12. Complete construction of the Burnham lot for use as an employee/customer parking facility. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Provide sufficient parking to meet employee demand, in conjunction with an access system that provides balanced and reasonable travel mode options. ✓ Encourage/incent shared parking in areas where parking is underutilized. The City has committed to building an off-street lot at Main and Burnham to both replace some of the on-street parking lost as a result of the Main Street Streetscape Improvement project and to serve the downtown as a location for employees to park as opposed to parking on-street and competing with visitors/customers. J& 13. Negotiate shared use agreements with private sector lots in the Main Street corridor. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Provide sufficient parking to meet employee demand, in conjunction with an access system that provides balanced travel mode options. ✓ Encourage/incent shared parking in areas where parking is underutilized. The 2010 DKS Parking Study sampled a significant portion of existing privately owned off-street parking lots located throughout the Downtown study zone. The general finding was that most are significantly underutilized, even during peak times (i.e., less than 50% percent occupied). These lots comprise approximately 751 stalls and are generally without signage or have signage that is inconsistent and confusing to customers and visitors.The ability of the City to "capture" as many privately owned stalls as are available for more active management will provide a relatively low cost near to mid-term strategy for mitigating existing and future access constraints during peak parking demand periods. 4 Shared use agreements in other cities are wide and varied. In some cases (e.g. Gresham, Oregon)the owner of the property"donates" surplus stalls to the City on a month to month basis in return for assistance with signage and landscape/maintenance costs. Other cities (e.g., Kirkland, WA) program funds within their parking budgets to lease surplus stalls from the private sector. These stalls are then signed and/or metered and operated through the City's overall parking program (including marketing and communications). It is recommended that the City,through the Parking Coordinator and City Center Advisory Commission: Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule a. Initiate an effort to work with owners of private lots to enter into shared use agreements to allow underutilized parking to be made available to customer/visitor or employee uses (as appropriate). b. Explore the development of incentives to encourage such agreements (i.e., signage, landscaping, lighting, sidewalk improvements, leasing, etc.). 14. Strategically place new and unique wayfinding at corridor entry portals and at off-street facilities. See design package in Strategy 10. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ The City's public information system should provide a clear and consistent message about auto parking and access to and within downtown in order to optimize utility and convenience for all users. ✓ Provide an "access product" that is of the highest quality to create a safe and positive customer experience with parking and access associated with the downtown. ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to understand. Creating a uniform signage package that incorporates a unique logo and color scheme for placement at key access portals into the corridor and at publicly available parking facilities will establish a sense of recognition, identity and customer orientation for users of the downtown parking system. It is recommended that the City: a. Develop a signage package that incorporates a uniform design, IP A R K logo, and color scheme into all informational signage related to �L:7�' parking(see Strategy 10). 40h & Yamhill b. Brand each off-street public facility, open to public access, with the established "logo" package. c. Identify key entry points into the Main Street corridor for placement of directional signage. The City Center Advisory Commission or downtown business association can serve as a forum for development of such a package. Cost, budgets and an implementation strategy will need to be developed as well for review by the City Manager and the City Council. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule 15. Identify strategic locations for bicycle parking throughout the Main Street corridor. Consider bike parking(e.g. bike boxes) in the Burnham lot as well. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Provide an access system that provides balanced and reasonable travel mode options. Stakeholders indicated that promotion and encouragement of bicycling was the best near term approach to increasing awareness and use of non-auto modes for downtown Tigard. Strategic placement of quality bike parking along the Main Street corridor assures bicycle access is accommodated in safe, secure and convenient locations within the downtown. 16. Partner with business community to develop and initiate a marketing and communications plan for access to the downtown (e.g., maps, bag stuffers,webpage(s),etc.) Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Make downtown parking user-friendly—easy to access, easy to • understand. ✓ Provide an "access product" that is of the highest quality to create a safe and positive customer experience with parking and access associated with the downtown. ✓ The City's public information system should provide a clear and consistent message about auto parking, preferably under a common brand. A successful parking system will require on-going marketing and communication.The foundation for a marketing and communication program is the signage and wayfinding package recommended in this report (see strategies 10, 11& 14). Support of this system can be facilitated through informational maps and brochures about Tigard and its parking system distributed by the City and through partnering business networks. Overall this would provide a coordinated system of communication for all those who want to access downtown Tigard. / m It is recommended that the City: Partner with the business community to develop a marketing and I communication system for access in downtown Tigard. The City Center Marketing:Tacoma WA Advisory Commission or a future downtown business association can Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule serve as the forum for this discussion as well as in coordination with stakeholders involved in the Downtown Main Street Study and Plan. 17. Develop and implement an on-street employee parking permit program (i.e., paid permits)that would allow limited use of on-street all day parking on streets adjacent to the Main Street core. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Recognize that on-street parking is a finite resource and should be managed to assure maximum access for the priority customer. ✓ Provide sufficient parking to meet employee demand, in conjunction with an access system that provides balanced and reasonable travel mode options. Moves longer term parkers into underutilized parking while opening up stalls in the core for priority visitor parking. 85%occupancy standard on-street is the trigger. Management of a downtown permit program could be coordinated through and managed by a downtown business association. 18. Monitor downtown parking utilization continuously and periodically. Conduct parking inventory analyses. r, Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Implement measurements and reporting that ensures Guiding Principles are supported and achieved. ✓ Manage the public parking supply using the "85% Rule"to inform and guide decision-making. The recently completed analysis of Tigard's parking inventory provides excellent information on parking utilization,turnover, duration of stay, peak hour capacity and demand. The need for this data is very important as a foundation piece for determining actions to maximize parking supply. Periodic monitoring of parking activity will allow Tigard to (a) better coordinate strategy implementation, (b) assure maximum utilization based on intended uses and (c) provide solid evidence for the need to move to higher and/or more aggressive levels of parking management as called for in the Guiding Principles. It is recommended that a parking inventory analysis be conducted at least every three years. Information from these updates would be forwarded to the Parking Coordinator and the City Center Advisory Commission for review, evaluation and strategy implementation. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule 19. Initiate parking enforcement activities in the downtown as parking occupancies exceed 85% to ensure existing time zones are honored and system utilization/turnover is operating as intended. ✓ Recognize that on-street parking is a finite resource and should be managed to assure maximum access for the priority customer. ✓ Make the downtown conveniently accessible for the priority user of the public parking system— the patron of downtown. ✓ Manage the public parking supply using the 85% Rule to inform and guide decision-making. The 2010 DKS Parking study indicates low parking occupancies in the downtown. As such, strict or aggressive enforcement is not necessary at this time. Use of the 85% occupancy standard should serve as the trigger point for consideration of any new enforcement above status quo. 20. Sponsor employer based initiatives that encourage and incent employees to use alternative commute modes. Guiding Principle(s)Supported: ✓ Provide sufficient parking to meet employee demand, in conjunction with an access system that provides balanced and reasonable travel mode options. 4W' '*-u6, As the downtown evolves,greater constraints to parking access will occur given (a)the scarcity of land for surface parking development and (b)the cost of future parking supply that is transitioned into parking structures. To this end, more focused programs and incentives will need to be provided to commuters to increase use of transit, bike, and walk and rideshare options. The City and downtown stakeholders should devote time and discussion to establishing commute trip reduction programs within the downtown. The City Center Advisory Commission and/or a downtown business association can serve as a forum to bring TriMet, businesses and the City together to discuss and create new incentives and directions for transportation demand management. VI. SUMMARY The parking management strategies recommended here are intended to provide a template for action that would lead to a more efficient and organized parking system for the downtown. The strategies would be led by a Parking Coordinator with informed insight and direction from a representative Advisory Committee that could be the current City Center Advisory Commission or a future downtown business association. The strategies envisioned here will be implemented over a minimum of three years,triggered by the 85% Rule and documented parking demand. Overall, the strategies are designed to get the "right parker to the right parking spot" in a manner that supports the Guiding Principles established as a part of this plan. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule ACTIONS& IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Immediate Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Strategy (0-6 (6-18 Comment months) mos.) POLICY ACTIONS 1 Adopt Guiding Themes& Provides decision-making framework and policy Principles as formal policies ✓ foundation for for downtown access within decisions/actions the transportation code. 2 Industry standard that defines Adopt the 85%Rule as the a supply of parking as optimum occupancy constrained if it is 85%or standard for measuring more occupied in the peak performance of the parking hour for some sustained supply and"triggering" period of time. When a specific management `� supply reaches that sustained strategies and rate ranges. level of constraint,more aggressive parking and/or TDM strategies should be considered and initiated to bring the occupancy to a level under 85%. 3 Need to coordinate plan Assign/designate a implementation and provide centralized point of contact community a single point of ✓ reference for parking or lead staff to serve as management in the downtown. downtown Parking This could be a coordinated Coordinator/Manager relationship with a downtown business association. 4 To provide routine oversight and continued input from Routinely review downtown stakeholders in the on-going parking issues with the City management and assessment Center Advisory Commission ✓ ✓ of the parking system. Over time this could become a function of a relationship with a downtown business association. 5 In the future,on-street parking Clarify and define"exception" in districts will be formatted criteria and process for using a base standard(e.g.,2 loading zones and"non- hours). Exceptions to the base standard"on-street parking ✓ ✓ standard should be granted stalls. only for businesses that demonstrate a legitimate need (e.g.,dry cleaner,post office, ticketing outlet,etc.) OPERATIONS 6 Provides upgrade to sidewalks Complete Main Street and on-street parking system Streetscape Improvement ✓ layout and design. Improved project streetscape,lighting and landscaping. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule Immediate Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Strategy (0-6 (6-18 Comment months) mos.) 7 Re-stripe all on-street parking Upgrades existing parking in the Main Street study zone. ✓ supply to provide clear and All"downtown"on-street convenient identification of on- parking should be clearly street parking. striped. 8 This will provide(a)customer Standardize all on-street oriented parking stalls, (b)ease ✓ of understanding and(c) parking on Main Street to 2 consistency in the Main Street Hour parking. area. 9 Maximizes use of underutilized Provide for a 3 Hour or by on street parking adjacent to Permit standard for on the Main Street corridor and encourages employees to park street parking adjacent to ✓ ✓ in areas that are not adverse to the Main Street Corridor. the need for street level Coordinate this standard parking turnover. Could begin with Strategies 10, 11 and 17 as 10 Hour parking with below transition to 3 or by permit based on visitor deman. 10 �, Necessary to support new Coordinate new parking time stay format on-street. signage design with the Downtown Pedestrian and Wayfinding Project. Submit service package for new right of way signage per on- street changes in 8 above and 9 above 11 Improves customer awareness Replace all current on-street ✓ of parking option and time zone signage with new supports priority parking signage package Guiding Principle. 12 The Burnham lot will provide Complete construction of supply for employees that the Burnham lot for use as ✓ currently park on-street as an employee/customer well as additional supply to parking facility. customers and visitors. 13 Negotiate shared use Redirect underutilized private agreements with private ✓ ✓ parking supply for more sector lots in the Main Street general public use. corridor. MID-TERM IMPLEMENTATION Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard ; Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule Immediate Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Strategy (0-6 (6-18 Comment months) mos.) 14 Improves customer awareness Strategically place new and ✓ ✓ of supply options unique wayfinding at corridor entry portals and at off-street facilities. See design package in Strategy 10. 15 Ensures bicycle access is Identify strategic locations ✓ ✓ accommodated in safe,secure for bicycle parking and convenient locations throughout the Main Street within the downtown. corridor. Consider bike parking(e.g.bike boxes)in the Burnham lot as well. 16 Provides a coordinated Partner with business ✓ ✓ system of communication for community to develop and all those who want to access initiate a marketing and downtown Tigard. communications plan for access to the downtown (e.g.,maps,bag stuffers, webpage(s),etc.) 17 Ad Moves longer term parkers Develop and implement an ✓ into underutilized parking on-street employee parking while opening up stalls in the permit program(i.e.,paid core for priority visitor permits)that would allow parking. 85%occupancy limited use of on-street all standard on-street is the day parking on streets trigger. Management of a adjacent to the Main Street downtown permit program core. could be coordinated through and managed by a downtown business association. LONG-TERM IMPLEMENTATION 18 Update 2010 Parking Study to Monitor downtown parking ✓ provide information for utilization continuously andl informed decision making and periodically. Conduct to measure impact of parking parking inventory analyses. management plan. Supports 85%Rule 19 Reduces abuse of time zones Initiate parking enforcement ✓ and increases turnover. activities in the downtown as parking occupancies exceed 85%to ensure existing time zones are honored and system utilization/turnover is operating as intended. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule Immediate Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Strategy (0-6 (6-18 Comment months) mos.) 20 Uses Parking Advisory Sponsor employer based Committee as forum to initiatives that encourage discuss and develop programs and incent employees to use and services to encourage alternative commute modes transit,biking and walking for downtown employees. Supports more efficient use of existing supplies of parking by transitioning employees into alternative modes. Rick Williams Consulting- City of Tigard Downtown Parking Management Strategy&Implementation Schedule