06/08/2011 - Packet Completeness Review
for Boards, Commissions
and Committee Records
CITY OF TIGARD
City Center Advisory Commission
Name of Board, Commission or Committee
June 8,2011
Date of Meeting
I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record.
Caren Frykland
Print Name
odu&-1��
Signature
11/8/11
Date
n
= � City of Tigard
TIGARD City Center Advisory Commission Agenda
MEETING DATE: Wednesday,June 8, 2011 — 6:30-8:20 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Public Library- 2nd Floor Conference Room
13500 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223
1. Welcome and Introductions ....................................................................................................6:30 — 6:35
2. Review / Approve May Minutes.............................................................................................6:35 — 6:40
3. CCAC Executive Session*........................................................................................................6:40 — 7:10
Propery purchase discussion
(Sean Farrelly)
4. 2nd Quarter update on 2011 CCAC Goals..............................................................................7:10 — 7:30
Review progress on CCACgoals
(Sean Farrelly)
5. CCDA Financial Update............................................................................................................7:30 — 7:40
Review information on urban renewal revenues and expenditures
(Sean Farrelly)
6. HCT Land Use Plan....................................................................................................................7:40 — 7:55
Update on May 25 Design workshop and next steps
(Sean Farrelly)
7. Downtown Marketing Strategy.................................................................................................7:55 — 8:05
Report from Michele Reeves workshop and upcoming presentation
(Sean Farrelly,Vice-Chair Shearer and Commissioners Louw and Thornburg)
8. Commissioner Reports .............................................................................................................8:05 — 8:15
Brief updates from CCAC Art subcommittee and update on Main Street Green Street business coordination
(Vice-Chair Shearer and Commissioner Louw)
9. Other Business...........................................................................................................................8:15 — 8:20
10. Adjourn.......................................................................................................................................8:20 p.m.
*EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Center Advisory Commission will go into Executive Session to
discuss real property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and
those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to
attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed.
CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA—June 8, 2011
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2
No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.
Executive Sessions are closed to the public.
Upcoming meetings of note:
6/9,Parking Management Work Group meeting, Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main, 6:00-7:30 PM
6/14, CCDA, consideration of proposed CCDA budget,Tigard Town Hall, 7:30 PM
7/13, City Center Advisory Commission regular meeting, Red Rock Conference Room, 6:30-8:30 PM
7/14,Parking Management Work Group meeting, Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main, 6:00-7:30 PM
7/19, City Center Development Agency/CCAC joint meeting-Reeves presentation,Tigard Town Hall, 6:30 PM
8/3, HCT Citizen Advisory Committee,Library 2nd Floor Conference Room, 6:30-8:30 PM
CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA—June 8, 2011
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2
City Center Advisory Commission
Meeting Minutes
OR I I
Date of Meeting: June 8, 2011
Location: Tigard Public Library—2nd Floor Conference Room
Called to order by: Chair Thomas Murphy
Time Started: 6:31 p.m.
Time Ended: 8:49 p.m.
Commissioners Present: Carolyn Barkley;Alexander Craghead;Alice Ellis Gaut (arrived 6:44);
Ralph Hughes (arrived 6:44); Peter Louw; Chair Thomas Murphy; Linh Pao; Vice Chair Elise
Shearer; Philip Thornburg
Commissioners Absent:
Others Present: Councilor Marland Henderson; Gary Romans
Staff Present: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Pro)ect Manager; Caren Frykland, Sr. Administrative
Specialist; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant
AGENDA ITEM #1: Welcome and Introductions
Introductions were made.
AGENDA ITEM #2: Approve Minutes
Motion by Commissioner Louw, seconded by Commissioner Craghead, to approve the minutes of
the May 11, 2011 meeting. The motion passed. Commissioners Pao and Thornbug abstained. '
AGENDA ITEM #3: CCAC Executive Session
The City Center Advisory Commission went into Executive Session at 6:35 p.m. under the
provisions of ORS 192.660(2) (e) to discuss real property transaction negotiations. All discussions
within this session are confidential; therefore, nothing from this session may be disclosed by those
present. Executive Session concluded at 7:25 p.m.
Action Items (Follow-Up or Votes): Commissioners directed Staff which properties they would
Eke to look into further.
CCAC Meeting Minutes for June 8,2011 Page 1 of 4
AGENDA ITEM #4: 2nd Quarter Update on 2011 CCAC Goals
Sean provided an update on 2nd Quarter 2011 goals for the CCAC (Exhibit #).
• "Council/CCDA Liaison present at all meetings." to be added under item VI. b.
Communication.
• Public Works has some preliminary ideas with regards to the feasibility study of at-grade
rail crossing at Ash Ave and the necessary reworking of the at-grade crossings at North
Dakota and Tiedeman. Sean said that all options have their own logistical and financial
challenges. He said that he would follow up with Mike McCarthy for more information.
• David Dahle's attendance at CCAC meetings and updates to downtowntigard.com
should be added to Item VII. b. "Ongoing Processes — Increase awareness of the impact
our work has had on the community."
Chair Murphy asked the commissioners to let him,Vice Chair Shearer or Sean know which of the
goals for 2011 should be prioritized in the second half of the year.
AGENDA ITEM #5: CCDA Financial Update
Sean discussed the CCDA financial update. He provided a handout (Attachment A) that
summarized tax increment collected versus capital expenditures as well as debt incurred and repaid.
He said that the direction from the CCDA Budget Committee was that if a property became
available, the agency would obtain private financing. Commissioner Craghead suggested that the
summary should include separate line items for loans from the general fund versus bonded debt.
Chair Murphy said that the summary provided good information and it should be included quarterly
with the goal updates.
AGENDA ITEM #6: HCT Land Use Plan
Sean provided an update from the HCT design workshop. He said that there were four CCAC
commissioners in attendance. He said that they looked at 7 potential station locations and various
typologies (Attachments B & C). He said that the results of the workshop would be evaluated and
used to inform the alternatives for each potential station location. He said that there was an
opportunity to have a joint Planning Commission/CCAC session to talk about some of the issues
relating to HCT land use. He said that the results of the workshop would be presented to the
HCTCAC on August 3 if anyone wanted to attend.
AGENDA ITEM #7: Downtown Marketing Strategy
Sean said that Michele Reeves did a workshop recently attended by Councilor Henderson and some
of the commissioners. Commissioner Thornburg said that it was a well-run session that included
very intensive discussions looking at how people feel about downtown. Sean said that there would
CCAC Meering Minutes for June 8,2011 Page 2 of 4
be a joint CCAC/CCDA workshop on July 19 where Ms. Reeves would discuss her work and her
recommendations for next steps. The CCAC will receive the CCDA packet prior to the 19th.
AGENDA ITEM #8: Conu-nissioner Reports
The order of the agenda was changed to take Item #8 ahead of Item #5.
Vice Chair Shearer gave an update on the CCAC Art Subcommittee. She said that she and
Commissioner Ellis Gaut met and looked at information and potential sites for public art. Topics
they considered included:
• Bike racks and benches as functional art
• Hosting an arts festival in the fall
• Focus on the Hall Boulevard Gateway as one of the first art sites
• Converting CCAC Arts Subcommittee into a future non-profit for the whole city's
benefit
• Incorporating nature into the streetscape
• Use of murals and mosaics as affordable art options
• Youth artist tag wall possibly near skate park.
Sean said that Valerie Otani was now under contract, and that there were three members of the
CCAC interested in participating in the arts subcommittee. He said that their goal was to find two
businesspeople and a Tigard artist to participate as well. He said that he would work with the
contractor to get the ad hoc subcommittee approved by the City Council so that they could move
forward.
Gary Romans, resident of Tigard, provided background on his new Tigard/Tualatin community
theatre group. He said that they would be doing quarterly public play readings at the Tigard and
Tualatin public libraries and that there would be a meeting on June 20 at the Tualatin library for
persons interested in joining the community theatre group. He said that they were looking for
theatre performance space. Chair Murphy suggested that Mr. Romans communicate with the Vice
Chair Shearer and the Arts Subcommittee for further information.
Commissioner Louw provided an update on the Main Street Green Street business coordination.
He said that the contract text would be revised for in the next draft. He said that it had been a
productive meeting, and that it was an ongoing process.
AGENDA ITEM #9: Other Business
Sean mentioned two brief items:
• July 24, 2011 — Grand opening for Burnham Street
• Check out downtowntigard.com for Main Street activities throughout the summer
CCAC Meeting N inutes for June 8,2011 Page 3 of 4
He also asked the commissioners if they preferred meeting in the library conference room or the
Red Rock room at City Hall. The consensus of the group was that the library was preferred.
AGENDA ITEM #10: Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 8:49.
Caren Frykland, C A Osecretary
l
ATTEST:
Chair Thomas Murphy ~~
CCAC Meeting Minutes for June 8,2011 Page 4 of 4
Attachment A
1.CCDA Financial Summary(without loan)
2008 2009 2010 2011 YTD Totals
Revenues:
Taxes Collected $ 38,469 $ 115,019 $ 255,601 $ 313,753 $ 722,842
Interest Earned 1,193 2,898 895 2,742 7,728
Other Revenue 17,020 796 17,816
39,662 117,917 273,516 317,291 748,386
Expenditures: -
Capital Expenditures* - 295,649 72,613 254,170 622,432
Revenues minus capital expenditures 125,954
*includes Burnham right-of-way purchase of$256,046 in 2009 and $200,000 Burnham Street enhancements in 2011.
2. CCDA Financial Summary (with loan)
2008 2009 2010 2011 YTD Totals
Revenues:
Taxes Collected $ 38,469 $ 115,019 $ 255,601 $ 313,753 $ 722,842
Interest Earned 1,193 2,898 895 2,742 7,728
Other Revenue 17,020 796 17,816
Loan Proceeds 323,616 70,071 12,025 405,712
Total Revenues 39,662 441,533 343,587 329,316 1,154,098
Expenditures: -
Capital Expenditures* - 295,649 72,613 254,170 622,432
Loan Repayment 249,000 249,000
Total Expenditures - 295,649 72,613 503,170 871,432
Increase in Net Assets $ 39,662 $ 145,884 $ 270,974 $ (173,854) $ 282,666
*includes Burnham right-of-way purchase of$256,046 in 2009 and $200,000 Burnham Street enhancements in 2011.
Attachment B
Project Background it it�� 'I City of Tigard
What is high Capacity Transit? 7Theback received today will be used High Capacity 'transit Land Use flan
Put simply,it is mare reliable,faster,and carries more e alternatives for the draft stationfpeople than traditional bus service. ity plan.These alternatives
PUBLICi{ _3 K H
will be reviewed by the Citizen Advisory ,,,! s
High capacity transit vehicles make fewer stops,travel Committee in August.The public will have
at higher speeds,have more frequent service and carry an opportunity to weigh in on the conceptual . ...
more people than local service transit such as
p P typical station community plan this fall.Subscribe
—A .'
Alg
bus lines,HOT can operate in exclusive right-of-way and/ to the CommunityDevelopment ListSery ��� ,
i w � a �
or non-exclusive right-of-way.HOT includes options such p ' a E.j
P and receive updates about this project
as light rail,commuter rail,rapid streetcar and bus rapid automatically.Visit www.tigard-or.gov/hct to
transit. sign up. $ .
i, Regional Southwest Corridor Process We Need Your Input Directions: Have a little fun playing mix and match.We need you to help us determine what type of station
Metro and its partners will be taking a two-phased
We want to create plans that reflect community best suits each potential location.Information about each of the potential locations
community values and have community
approach to determine how to improve connectivit and'typologies'is presented on posters around the room and in this packet.Use the inside
y support.We encourage you to become sheet to give us your feedback—how would you like to see the Tigard community grow?
between downtown Portland and the Tigard town center involved and contribute to the decision-
and on to Sherwood.Phase One will include planning making process.
broadly for housing,employment and land use as well as
auto,freight,local bus and high capacity transit,bicycle Online:
and pedestrian access and facilities.Phase Two will focus Submit your comments using our online DeBnttTon "hirameror& for d�sertbi6gtlhe charar ter of ttifferentuear (heed fn coAuperiag aad tontraeUag ';
on developing high capacity transit improvements in the form at www.tigard-or.gov/hct. EhC[ti!1, eElANce. IV fat cmitikbf.
corridor that will be supported by the land use plan and Citizen Advisory Committee
completed in concert with other kinds of transportation a 1977
changes.There is still a lot of work ahead to determine g .,i d i ■lI1 r a
meetings: ar=.
the type of high capacity transit—light rail,bus rapid The HCT Land Use Plan Citizen Advisory k,V `"" NMI ,
l
l
i
t d
ill(CAC)wmeet regularly
transit,commuter rail,or rapid streetcar—that would Committee(
best meet the needs of this corridor, scheduled Tigard Transportation Advisory
mu
Committee Meetings.Please check the Employment! Trar ,it Transit
website for meeting dates,times,locations `` ``?
Tigard High Capacity Transit Land Use Plan and materials. a.ls `_'}l F.et Retail Destination orr'dor Neighborhood
Any way you look at it,growth will likely come to the The area has an urban A moderately to Intensely A suburban residential feel Moderately populated with
s g
City of Tigard over the next 20 years.The Tigard High Email: village feel.Within one half populated station area mixed with commercial uses a residential feel.Housing in
Capacity Transit(HCT)Land Use Plan is an opportunity Send your comments and questions about mile around the station is with a land use emphasis closer to the transit corridor. the district is mainly single-
to decide what thisrowth will look like and where it the HCT Land Use Plan process to Senior a mix of housing,retail, on employment and retail Housing is in the form of dwelling residential with
g h
s services,civic uses and activities.Other possibilities townhouses and detached some multi-dweiling housing
should be located.Spurred b Metro's identification of the Transportation Planner Judith Gray,at include civic buildings
p Y jUd€thC�tigard-or.gov. office.Open spaces and 9 houses with apartments mixed in.There are limited
Southwest Corridor as the next priority corridor for high businesses combine to and colleges.This central located in clusters near the commercial uses which
Capacity transit,the Tigard HCT Land Use Plan will take Mail: create vibrant streets. employment/retail core is corridor.The area also has take the form of small-
surrounded by medium to
Apartments or condominiums moderately scaled office scale retail or office.More
a closer look at existing and potential land uses in the You may send your comments or questions high density multi-story
occupy the upper levet of employment,shopping and significant clusters of retail
general vicinity of the Pacific Highway corridor. by mail to: some buildings.The edges of housing like townhouses and dining located near the and restaurants are within
City buildings.This
y of Tigard I Attn:Judith Gray the area are predominantly station. walking and biking distance.
residential,blending creates opportunities to live
13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 9'into the
surrounding neighborhoods. and work in close proximity.
>#V s yp"r 1
217
1.•R ! `
- s
OW
...SSW Scholu•@°� _ '+P,.._ ^••:' - .....
rti _..s
Town Center/ °^•^- }T I
y � town Canters J '��� .. �'
I Z
, {
Main Street :( :. ._-• � 1:� .: _, -- j
N
L-77
'Fro Meir_
4'
t
fit$` 8 l
s._
7
i
a,
99W/GaarclelMcDonald
Employment
�
::.-cam' -
� 1
Retail Destination n-'�--� �•<"� _
1
w
.+ �. ,Mel K}Yiq: >. ,'. .*T:' �,.-,'•+):. ;.. _. ._J.,�•�p
auAs•SVeat 1 M°U011Wd� . c�^
I t;;'Z, 7 a
... W°4r'�tg7(lalytgyra
57,
k:'t.o'.54
_.Art _:�P.:�.-. `"•.:\::.'':r:::r>`''�r::
Z� -
'ice I ..-..Y', `• ,y` �:,i
1
M k
Transit
Corridor °aa• ""4 f� . i o�'
,
.rW.
W e
> N '.1 ger
.mss
••{<..acy..., .: .,.,.: :- Y:d:: ._• .. ., ,..3�"'^)•w�:.:.a. 7ratoit Can
�■ as F
T
.illy �
ir
r. rw"�o
Transit
Neighborhood
_ „__. �: °tea►,,,:.; y;:::':;
Httamment c
m
x
finxtion A framework for describing the character of different areas. Used in comparing and contr
the �stt�
e
�� eristics of good places. 'I`ypolo,�es are aspirational--they represent what could����,:<<:-.:.,
u '
YOU r.
leaf Niglio �
sin, MINIM a ... .. 23
IN
aM
Retail Destination Corridor Neighborhood
FAR: 1.00AR, 0.33
J E
� : 0.40 FAR: 0.50
units/acre: 24 units./acre: 8 units/acre: 10 units/acre:
employees/acre: employees/acre: 50 employees/acre:: - e EIPo; t= s°ac. e: Zo
CiiY of Tigard I i.Place t(>Cali 25 MAY 2011
Typology Comparisons
mployment/Retail Transit Neighborhood
al W11010
IN
1 + Specialty retail,office,dining, medium } An employment and regional shopping € Shopping, dining and residential Primarily residential
to high-density housing s destination ; i
s
1 The area has an urban village feel. i A moderately to intensely populated A suburban residential feel mixed with Moderately populated with a residential
+ Within one half mile around the station area with a land use emphasis ' commercial uses closer to the transit feet.Housing in the district is mainly
station is a mix of housing, retail, on employment and retail activities. corridor. Housing is in the form of single-dwelling residential with some
services,civic uses and office. Open Other possibilities include civic townhouses and detached houses with ? multi-dwelling housing mixed in.There
spaces and businesses combine to ! buildings and colleges.This central apartments located in clusters near the are limited commercial uses which take
create vibrant streets.Apartments or employment/retail core is surrounded corridor.The area also has moderately the form of small-scale retail or office.
condominiums occupy the upper level of by medium to high density multi-story scaled office employment,shopping More significant clusters of retail and
some buildings.Moving away from the housing in the form of townhouses and dining located near the station. restaurants are within walking and
station,there may be townhouses with ` and apartment buildings.This creates ± biking distance.
ground floor office and home-based opportunities to live and work in close j
businesses.The edges of the station proximity. !
area are predominantly residential, ;
blending into the surrounding
neighborhoods.
s
1 . 1 Lake Oswego/First Addition,downtown Bridgeport Village,Tanasbourne,and ; Hillsdale,Orenco and Lake Grove > taurelhurst, Ladd's Addition/ i
Mllwaukie and downtown Vancouver Lloyd/Irvington Hawthorne,Summerfield,and
l
SIIwood/e Westmoreland j
The area is considered a 14-hour The district is considered an 18-hour ' A 14-hour activity center,with a A 12-14 hour activity center.The
activity center,with daytime uses ! activity center,with a majority of majority of daytime uses in the form majority of residents leave the area to
that Include office jobs,retail and 3 daytime activity in the form of office of restaurants,cafes and retail. work.Most jobs found nearby are retail
restaurants. Nighttime activity includes jobs and shopping.Nighttime activity Schools and a range of personal and or restaurant focused.
eating and drinking establishments. includes full-service restaurants and i professional services are also found
entertainment. here.Nighttime uses are centered on
restaurants.
_..,.....................
.._....
Yes Yes i Yes Yes
I
i
� i
Accessible Yes Yes ! Yes i Yes t
typesall 1 I
i I
Agenda Item 3
Plaza Size Comparisons
Public area Approximate size(square feet)
Beaverton City Park(near Library) 114,000 (39,000 in front of library)
Millennium Plaza Lake Oswego 82,000
Jamison Square-Portland 40,000
Pioneer Courthouse Square—Portland 37,000
Tualatin Commons (round plaza at entrance only) 23,000
Director's Park- Portland 18,000
Plaza concept in Fanno Creek Park & Plaza Master Plan 54,000 (24,000 hardscape, 30,000 lawn)
.j'
r
FANNO CREEK
_lltl?gipFlPARK & PLAZA
r1
_.r
as Plan
y
1 ,�
Executive Summary
Significance of the Master Plan
The master plan provides for the restoration of Fanno Creek Park(from Hall
Blvd.to Main St)and the design of a new public plaza in Downtown. During
the 10-month planning process,several key decisions were made by the City
Center Development Agency(CCDA),the City's Urban Renewal Agency,including
approval of the location of the plaza,a plaza district plan which defines a concept
plan for the area surrounding the plaza,and the specific design itself of the
upland park,plaza and lower Fanno Creek Park. The master plan is necessary for 7
implementation of projects as defined in the City Center Urban Renewal Plan,
adopted by City Council and approved by voters in May 2006.
Goals and Vision
Building on the citizen-drive Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan,approved by
Council in September of 2005,this project articulates a specific vision for Fanno •#,
Creek Park and a Downtown Plaza. The Fanno Creek Park and Plaza Master Plan ;.
establishes the"Green Heart"identified in the downtown plan by locating the
primary open space and plaza between Downtown and the community's unique ~
natural resource-Fanno Creek. J '
The community seeks to redefine the Downtown through a sustainable,open
space network that directly connects daily life to the natural environment. The -
Downtown Plaza was designed to meet the need for a community gathering Perspectives of Plaza and Upland Park
space for events and everyday use,and the goal of initiating redevelopment
under a new Urban Renewal District approved in May of 2006.
With guidance from the downtown plan,the project focuses on the restoration
of Fanno Creek Park and development of a public plaza as"catalyst"for
redevelopment.The Guiding Principles of the downtown plan were used as guide
posts for development of the master plan:
Guiding Principles-Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan
• Reflects the community's values and cultures
• Possesses qualities essential to successful downtowns -
• Recognizes the value natural resources provide as both an amenity and sense 6g
of place
• Capitalizes on commuter rail and Fanno Creek as catalysts for future
investments and development
• Incorporates a multi-modal transportation system - -
• Pedestrian friendly and not visually dominated by automobiles
• Forward thinking �1
• Creative use and re-use of under-utilized properties ' f
• Key signature projects capable of being carried out Perspective of Fountain
• City codes and regulations that allow implementation
1
Executive Summary
Process
The master plan balances the restoration of Fanno Creek and its associated natural
areas with the community's desire for access and recreation. It was developed
through an extensive public process which included numerous meetings with the
Steering committee and the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC),public open
houses,and presentations to the City Council. Through this dialogue the plan was
established and refined based on the goals and vision of the community.
The process included a thorough analysis of existing conditions,development
of project goals and a program for use,evaluation of potential plaza locations,
development of a plaza district plan,formulation of design alternatives,and
ultimately the refinement and completion of the Master Plan.
Master Plan
The project area was evaluated and designed based on the environmental
attributes and the activities envisioned.The lower park includes the areas
adjacent to Fanno Creek including its associated wetland,floodplain,and primary
vegetated area.The upland park includes those areas beyond the lowland area
and creek and is available for active recreation and gatherings.These two areas are
seamlessly connected and provide for a wide variety of public use.
Upland Park And Plaza
The upland park and plaza are programmed to become the primary public
gathering place for the community. It is designed to be welcoming,and flexible
for daily use as well as for gatherings.There is an open play space available for
family use. The plaza,abutting Burnham Street,is the key identifier of the park
and houses an interactive fountain,pavilion,and a man-made"urban creek"-a
visual representation of the community's commitment to sustainability.The
"creek"functions to convey cleaned storm water from the upland park and other
areas of Downtown through the lower park to Fanno Creek. Symbolically,the
"urban creek"is the park reaching into Downtown.
Management of the plaza is critical to its long-term success. In order for the plaza
to become an active space used regularly and recognized by the public,it will
require scheduling and coordination,security,and maintenance. Management
of the plaza should be sufficiently funded and establish year-round activities. An
evaluation of organizational structures ranging from public to non-profit should
be done at the appropriate time to best meet community needs.
Lower Park
The lower park is proposed to be used for walking,biking and enjoyment of
nature. A primary focus of the plan is the establishment of a safe and enjoyable
visitor experience. The regional trail connects Tigard to a 15 mile stretch from
Willamette Park in Portland to the Tualatin River in Tualatin. Secondary paths,
bridges,and boardwalks are located to provide sufficient access while protecting
the park's natural areas. There are opportunities for interpretation and education
about the natural environment within the lower park.
Working jointly with Clean Water Services,the City plans to restore a major portion
of the creek and adjacent wetlands through establishing a natural meander and
extensive re-vegetation. Significant restoration of other portions of the park's
vegetation provides improved wildlife habitat and a sustainable ecology
Executive Summary
New Bridge and
Boardwalks � a
New Mixed Use O
/ 0 a
✓/ Plaza O \
A Boy "dAr
o \ \
\ , New H n� O
Q
CreelRiemeander •���� � \� '�O O
t ` Interpretive Point
N4Ser Bo rdwa Entrance Feature O
_ PublitlVorks
Annex
7 �wer P r
and t
ce ent Area i 3.' nd a
i w Boardwalk ►
/ Sw nal
e an itiga on Area
R it ridge
rade ' w idge Verizon
ntrance
'Regional Trail Oxbow Ponds
A � City Hall
u p9
0 � rads
Entrance
Upgrade
New Bridge y �,, �. Entrance
New Boardwalk {
New Bridge -
� feet
Fanno Creek Park Master Plan
3
Executive Summary
Light Columns
Mixed Use Cafe Seating
Interactive Fountain
Q
Pavilion
Urban Creek
Open Lawn ! ��
Housing
Play Area
Overlook Pier
1r
` \ Festival Street
r_
+r Housin
z" f
S00
"mieet
Upland Park&Plazo
9.•.rum Slv....w t.;tt Cdum Pa.Kn io.roo r— � IY�W9�/ r—aMeat
Section A
4
Executive Summary
Redevelopment
The success of the plaza and upland park area will be largely based on
redevelopment of adjacent property,capable of activating the space and
serving as a model for new development in Downtown.A series of development
scenarios were examined,economics of the area analyzed,and preliminary
Design Guidelines for adjacent properties developed to help guide future
development. The Design Guidelines as referenced in Appendix I are preliminary
only and will be further developed by the City for inclusion in the City code. They
represent a starting point for defining the scale,type and quality of development
desired adjacent to the plaza.
A festival street is established as part of the redevelopment of parcels south of
the plaza,providing access to the upland park,and a seamless connection to
the plaza itself.The street will be designed with primary concern for pedestrian
movement, may be closed to traffic on the weekends,and transformed into the
home of the Tigard's Farmers Market.
�N
-' y v
Ret 'A� \ Commuter
Rail
�VOffice
Parking
X\\ Mixed
VUse � \
Mixed \
Retail Use
00* Plaza` \
athering ," \
Upland Spa \ <�,� A
Park \. �h4'\///` Future Corridor \
\ �-re Connections
A Housing/PAC \
Lower Park/ Housing \
Natural Area
0
New Festival Street
\\ a Project Boundary
a
Plaza District Plan
5
Agenda Item #4
CAC 2011 GoalsQuarter Update
I. Project Infrastructure
a. Oversee, review and provide input including a.
the following key projects: i. CCAC updated on 30% design
i. Main Street/Green Street Phase 1 ii. CCAC formally recommended spending
ii. Open Space/Downtown Park/Plaza Site the (10%)park bond funds on a public plaza
iii. Burnham Street Completion and to explore new open space sites
iv. 99W/Hall Gateway iii. Final Burnham pavement overlay
v. Lower Fanno Creek completed
vi. Transit Center Revitalization iv. Gateway will be included in public art
vii. Tigard Street Trail Pedestrian/Bike study
Boulevard vii. Tigard St. trail is part of Tigard MTIP
viii. Full Utilization of WES Park&Ride grant funding application
H. Economic Development
a. Work with Metro consultant to develop a.
marketing plan for downtown i. CCAC members have attended three
i. Engage neighborhoods, business owners, workshops and field trip led by consultant
property owners, potential tenants and
developers within the consultant process
b. Advocate for implementation of approved b. Funds to implement recommendations
plan included in proposed FY`11-12 CCDA
budget
III. Development
a. Promote downtown Tigard a. Staff has made several developer contacts
i. Outreach to developers/Solicit businesses
ii. Land assembly and direct development
options
b. Advise CCDA on possible incentives b. COMPLETE
c. Improve our knowledge of the downtown
businesses and customer base using census
information, cultural demographics, trends, and
other statistics
IV. Facade Improvement Program
a. Continue to promote and expand program a.
i. Consider expanding program onto streets in i.Joint committee recommended to keep the
addition to Main program Main Street focused for next FY.
ii. Pursue endorsements from participants Underwater Works facade improvement
iii. Develop evaluation metrics that are nearing completion. Former Tigard Fitness
qualitative and quantitative property participating in architectural
assistance.
Agenda Item #4
V. Circulation Plan
a. Review recommendation before final
adoption
b. Engage in regular communication with b. CCAC members attended HCT CAC
HCTCAC to ensure HCT transportation plan meetings and Design Workshop
meets needs and values of downtown and the
eater community
c. Continue discussing about the "Heart" of
downtown
d. Deep focus on RR crossing at Ash Avenue d.Ash Ave. connection to park and ride to
and opening to WES park and ride open end of June. Public works feasibility
study of at-grade rail crossing consolidation
in progress.
VI. Communication
a. Liaise with PRAB, HCTCAC and other a. PRAB members attended April CCAC
boards meeting. CCAC members have attended
HCT CAC and PRAB meetings
b. Engage in on-going communication with b.
Council and Staff
i. Attendance as warranted at council and CCDA
meetings
ii. Representation at downtown project meetings
c. Engage in on-going communication with hired c. CCAC attendance at Downtown
consultants Marketing meetings and parking
management meetings
d. Engage in on-going communication with
citizens of Tigard
e. Publish a Five-Year Report of e. CCAC subcommittee to work on
accomplishments
f. Begin a long-range plan to cover the 5, 10 and
15 years left in the URD
VII. Ongoing Processes
a. Continually improve CCAC processes and a.
procedures including,but not limited to: i. Draft annual calendar distributed at March
i.Annual calendar development meeting
ii. Continue to evolve meeting efficiency ii. Staff meets monthly with CCAC Chair and
and agendas Vice-Chair to set agendas
b. Increase awareness of the impact our work
has on the community
i. Continually work to increase transparency with
citizens
ii. Establish a quarterly financial report of Urban
Renewal Funds
c. Perform other duties as assigned by CCDA
1.CCDA Financial Summary(without loan)
2008 2009 2010 2011 YTD Totals
Revenues:
Taxes Collected $ 38,469 $ 115,019 $ 255,601 $ 313,753 $ 722,842
Interest Earned 1,193 2,898 895 2,742 7,728
Other Revenue 17,020 796 17,816
39,662 117,917 273,516 317,291 748,386
Expenditures: -
Capital Expenditures* - 295,649 72,613 254,170 622,432
Revenues minus capital expenditures 125,954
*includes Burnham right-of-way purchase of$256,046 in 2009 and $200,000 Burnham Street enhancements in 2011.
2. CCDA Financial Summary(with loan)
2008 2009 2010 2011 YTD Totals
Revenues:
Taxes Collected $ 38,469 $ 115,019 $ 255,601 $ 313,753 $ 722,842
Interest Earned 1,193 2,898 895 2,742 7,728
Other Revenue 17,020 796 17,816
Loan Proceeds 323,616 70,071 12,025 405,712
Total Revenues 39,662 441,533 343,587 329,316 1,154,098
Expenditures: -
Capital Expenditures* - 295,649 72,613 254,170 622,432
Loan Repayment 249,000 249,000
Total Expenditures - 295,649 72,613 503,170 871,432
Increase in Net Assets $ 39,662 $ 145,884 $ 270,974 $ (173,854) $ 282,666
*includes Burnham right-of-way purchase of$256,046 in 2009 and $200,000 Burnham Street enhancements in 2011.