The URL can be used to link to this page

04/13/2011 - Packet Completeness Review for Boards, Commissions im and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD City Center Advisory Commission Name of Board, Commission or Committee April 13, 2011 Date of Meeting I have verified that to the best of my knowledge, these documents are a complete copy of the official record. I was not the original administrator for this meeting. GVw-�Ltek,\ A . La a Print Name Signature 5 -a3-� � Date n City of Tigard City Center Advisory Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: Wednesday,April 13, 2011 — 6:30-8:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Public Library- 2nd Floor Conference Room 13500 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1. Welcome and Introductions...................................................................................................... 6:30— 6:35 2. Review / Approve March Minutes........................................................................................... 6:35 — 6:40 3. Parks and Recreation Board Coordination .............................................................................6:40 — 7:10 Discuss Downtown open space and Parks Bond funds (Chair Murphy,Vice-Chair Shearer, Commissioner Pao and PRAB representatives) 4. Downtown Public Art................................................................................................................7:10 — 7:35 Discuss potential process to coordinate with Main Street Green Street project (Sean Farrelly) 5. Main Street Green Street Project Update................................................................................7:35 — 7:50 Update on Open House and upcoming Parking Management Wlork Group meetings (Sean Farrelly) 6. Hall Blvd./Pacific Highway Gateway.......................................................................................7:50— 8:05 Review next steps for Hall/Pacific Hwy propery (Sean Farrelly) 7. Downtown Marketing Strategy.................................................................................................. 8:05 — 8:15 Keport from Michele Reeves presentation and upcoming schedule (Sean Farrelly, Commissioners Louw and Thornburg) 8. Commissioner Reports............................................................................................................... 8:15 — 8:25 Brief report on Facade Improvement Joint Committee, Metro Climate Leadershp Summit (Vice-Chair Shearer, Commissioner Hughes, and Commissioner Pao) 9. Other Business............................................................................................................................. 8:25 — 8:30 10. Adjourn.......................................................................................................................................... 8:30 p.m. Upcoming meetings of note: 4/14,Parking Management Work Group meeting, Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main, 6:00-7:30 PM 4/18,Budget Committee Meeting,Public Works Auditorium, 8777 SW Burnham, 6:30 -8:30 PM CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA—April 13, 2011 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 oft 4/20,Downtown Marketing, Field Trip to North Mississippi Ave., 11:00 AM-1:30 PM (leave from Tigard City Hall) 4/21,The Knoll Grand Opening, 12291 SW Knoll, 11:30-1:30 PM 4/25,Budget Committee Meeting, Public Works Auditorium, 6:30 -8:30 PM 5/2,Budget Committee Meeting, Public Works Auditorium, 6:30 -8:30 PM (potential) 5/11, City Center Advisory Commission regular meeting,location TBD, 6:30-8:30 PM 5/12,Parking Management Work Group meeting, Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main, 6:00-7:30 PM 5/25,Tigard HCT Land Use Design Workshop,Library Community Room, 6:00-8:30 PM (tentative) CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA—April 13, 2011 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 oft City Center Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes Date of Meeting: April 13, 2011 Location: Tigard Public Library—2nd Floor Conference Room Called to order by: Chair Thomas Murphy Time Started: 6:30 p.m. Time Ended: 8:55 p.m. Commissioners Present: Carolyn Barkley; Ralph Hughes; Peter Louw; Chair Thomas Murphy; Linli Pao; Vice Chair Elise Shearer; Philip Thornburg Commissioners Absent: Alexander Craghead;Alice Ellis Gaut Others Present: Troy Mears and Holly Polivka,Tigard Park and Recreation Advisory Board representatives; Councilor Marland Henderson; David Dahle Staff Present: Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager; Patty Lunsford,Planning Assistant; Tim Lehrbach,Temporary Planning Assistant; Steve Martin, Parks & Facilities Manager AGENDA ITEM #1: Welcome and Introductions Introductions were made. AGENDA ITEM #2: Approve Minutes Motion by Chair Thomas Murphy, seconded by Commissioner Louw, to approve the March minutes. The motion passed. Commissioner Barkley abstained. AGENDA ITEM #3: Parks and Recreation Board Coordination Sean introduced Troy Mears and Holly Polivka, representatives for the Tigard Park and Recreation Advisory Board (DRAB). PRAB was invited to discuss their expectations and how they think the process will go. The PRAB is the citizen committee that has been passed with making recommendations to Council as to property that is being purchased. The CCAC will have a role in recommending good property to purchase within the downtown, especially for a potential plaza which has been a long time desire of many in the community. CCAC Meeting Minutes for April 13,2011 Page 1 of 7 Sean summarized the planning process in 2007 that identified the Stevens Marine property as a place for the plaza. Basically we haven't gotten much movement there because that is a functioning business that wants to continue operating and they want to move somewhere that would make business sense for them. Therefore, at this point we are considering other locations. The PRAB representatives stated that they were there to hear any recommendations that the CCAC might have to use the money or funds from the bond measure which specified up to 10% of the funds for downtown. PRAB is concentrating now on having community members come in and make their suggestions about properties through May and then they will evaluate them in June,July, and August and make a recommendation to City Council in September. That doesn't necessarily include anything with the downtown at this point, but when properties are suggested, they will evaluate it and put it through their criteria. PRAB will be looking for properties that they can leverage as much funds as possible from grants, SDC's and urban renewal. Sean handed out the latest version of the criteria for the plaza location. Chair Murphy asked PRAB for follow up feedback on how the criteria that the CCAC identified (Exhibit A) would line up to their way of thinking for a plaza site, match up or don't with the PRAB criteria. Discussion followed: • PRAB has four main criteria based on the parks system master plan and are divided up so they can grade them as to how they actually meet the master plan. • Chair Murphy indicated criteria might better be labeled values. They are aspects of potential plaza sites. Different parcels of property are going to score higher or lower on certain values. • Public input should be a key component when purchasing property. • There are approximately 60 properties on the citywide list. • Discussed advertising in the Times newspaper and Cityscape. • PRAB indicated that the downtown sites in the Park System Master Plan include the Fanno Creek House, the lower Fanno Creek Park and the Fanno Creek Plaza. It describes in fairly vague terms, and doesn't describe properties, except for the Fanno Creek House which was purchased just before the 2009 parks master plan. • Any suggestions from PRAB would be helpful to the CCAC in trying to identify and moving toward possible acquisition of a downtown plaza site. • The city has put out an RFP for a consultant to manage park land acquisition. It was asked how PRAB will expect to interact with that consultant. The consultant will run the acquisition and development process and the downtown could fall into that process. • Councilor Henderson indicated that it was his understanding the general body of money is 80% for property purchase and 20% for park development. Does that same apply to the 1.7 million that's downtown? The PRAB representative indicated that 20% was a maximum for development. CCAC Meeting Minutes for April 13,2011 Page 2 of 7 • Bonds were purchased in February, 2011. We only have 3 years total to spend the funds, which is another reason that without a downtown site identified yet, there probably won't be a lot of development by the end of the three years. Most of the bond funds can go towards purchase. • It's challenging to find affordable property downtown. • PRAB shared that streets could also be used for a plaza. Potentially Burnham Street or Ash Avenue would be an option. Circulation and parking would be an issue. Action items: • First, start the process of identifying other sources of funds besides the parks bond to leverage those dollars. • Second, we need to get an article in the Cityscape asking for public input if possible. • Once the consultant is selected for property, getting some face time with the CCAC and that person would be desirable. PRAB meets the second Monday every month and invited the CCAC to attend anytime. Non-Agenda Item: David Dahle came in later in the meeting and was invited to introduce himself by Chair Murphy. He is a media partner with the Tigard Chamber of Commerce. He runs a non-profit media company that produces online videos about downtown Tigard, Tigard Festival of Balloons, and the Family Fest and is creating a video library of Tigard's events history on their website at DowntownTigard.com. He briefly gave a background for the reasons he was there including being a resource to the CCAC in communicating what they are doing. AGENDA ITEM #4: Downtown Public Art Sean Farrelly gave a handout to the Commissioners for the streetscape plan that deals with public art (Exhibit B). The focus tonight is on the Main Street art concept. Possible ideas include gateways at 99W to invite travelers onto Main Street, a commuter rail station clock tower or vertical artwork, art walk, smaller scale sculptures along Main Street, and enhancing functional elements to enrich the pedestrian experience. • The Main Street green street project is currently being designed and we want to have the sites where we want public art identified and if possible, install pieces to coincide with the construction next summer. • Funding for the art is part of the match for the urban renewal for the Main Street green street. Urban renewal funds will provide a $200,000 match. A similar project on Portland's Kenton North Denver Ave. green street streetscape spent about$80,000 on public art (Exhibit C). CCAC Meeting Minutes for April 13,2011 Page 3 of 7 • We want some kind of marking at the gateways at 99W but then having more pedestrian oriented, small scale art that can be enjoyed as you walk along Main Street. • Maybe we could also get some public art, a little map of the trail, turtle sculptures, or informational plaques near the Fanno Creek trail entrance near A-Boy. • It was suggested to create an ad hoc committee with a mix of CCAC members and others, such as Main Street business owners, teachers in the art education community, local artists in the area, and The Foundation for Smart Kids which have "Art and the Birds". • Need a minimum of two people from the CCAC on the ad hoc committee. Sean noted that membership of the ad hoc committee must be approved by Council. Chair Murphy suggested Commissioners Craghead and Gaut as potential ad hoc CCAC members. • Vice Chair Shearer was tasked with the "nub" of the committee to handle recruiting members of the public from the groups previously identified to fill the ad hoc committee. • A Commissioner mentioned that Chris Lewis worked on the streetscape and commuter rail projects and has knowledge of art funds. Sean will provide contact information for Chris Lewis. • A discussion took place about the potential process for Main Street public art and the north end of the tracks. There is currently no funding for green street phase II. Due to changes, it's harder but not impossible to get some funding from the MTIP. • There was discussion about different themes for different areas such as the Burnham Street intersection. AGENDA ITEM #S: Main Street Green Street Project Update Sean provided an Update on Open Houses and upcoming Parking Management Work Group meetings (Exhibit D). • Attendance at the open house two weeks ago at the library included two Commissioners and about 10 others. • Sean indicated there was good feedback provided from people at the open house on the 30 percent design submittal and HHPR, the firm that designed the plans,will consider them. A lot of the major design items are getting close to being set in stone. One thing that is not set is the turn-around. Need to work out issues with the property owners involved. Kim McMillian with the City of Tigard engineering department is leading that effort. Crossings are getting firmed up with one change from before. Instead of having raised pedestrian crossings at all the crossings, now they are just talking about doing it at the Tigard Street intersection making that whole intersection raised. Then possibly also at the Fanno Creek crossing. The other crossings would have the bulb outs to shorten the distance for a pedestrian to cross but they wouldn't be raised, they would have different colored concrete. • Sean provided the Commissioners with construction plans for the public roadway improvements to Main Street/Johnson Street/Tigard Street rendered by HHPR (Exhibit E). CCAC Meeting Minutes for April 13,2011 Page 4 of 7 • Commissioner Barkley advised that the parking discussion group wanted other crossings raised. The point was to slow down traffic. • Message from the CCAC is "put the raised crossings back, or explain why". Sean was asked to find out why this change was made. • There was discussion about the impact of Burnham Street construction on downtown businesses. • If project is not ready to go by spring 2011, then it may have to wait until 2012. • It was asked if there's a timetable for street construction. Sean indicated there was no schedule yet for this project. Chair Murphy asked Sean to find out if there is anything vaguely resembling a schedule now and what is the process and timeline for the maturation schedule. The CCAC wants to be informed of both the status of the engineering and of the development schedule of the Main Street green street project. • It was suggested that the RFP for the consultant for the Main Street project needs to contain language to the effect that the project manager shall notify downtown business owners every 48 hours routinely. In the event of changes to the schedule, especially that will affect street closures, a maximum 24-hour turnaround time. • Sean gave a brief update on the parking management workgroup meetings. Construction will start the second half of spring unless off schedule. We will be working with consultant Rick Williams again to get input on downtown property owner's expectations. Scheduled for four meetings once a month: April 14, May 12,June 9,July.14. • Chair Murphy asked Sean to provide a report on the parking management workgroup on the May agenda. AGENDA ITEM #6: Hall Blvd./Pacific Highway Gateway Sean reviewed the elements for interim Hall/99W Gateway (Exhibit F). The property in question is going to be turned over to the city from the county soon as long as there is no environmental contamination found. • CCDA has different ideas than the CCAC recommended. Major concern now is just to get something done. As an interim treatment for now, we need to screen the current views and put in some simple and attractive landscaping and not do anything that will preclude a bigger project that can be done in conjunction when the neighboring properties redevelop. • Sean suggested possibly black vinyl slat chain link fencing with attractive hedges. • It was suggested that the fence material be a concrete board on the fence painted green like a backdrop for the hedges. • A Commissioner recounted previous discussions that because the screening is temporary that perhaps local public school art students participate in painting and designing something that would be inclusive of the community. • It was also recommended placing images from the Downtown Vision on a bulletin board showing what is going on in downtown Tigard. • The general consensus was that there are better screening options than the black fence. CCAC Meeting Minutes for April 13,2011 Page 5 of 7 • Chair Murphy stressed that they weren't going to reach a consensus on the type of screening at this time and made a motion that the proposed approach being agenda item #6, be approved. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hughes. The Commissioners took a vote and the motion failed. Sean indicated that they can bring the issue back to a future meeting. • Vice Chair Shearer will formulate an alternative proposal for consideration by the CCDA for a bulletin board showing what's happening downtown. AGENDA ITEM #7: Downtown Marketing Strategy Commissioner Louw reported on the March presentation on the downtown marketing strategy by consultant Michele Reeves • About 50 business, property owners and other stake holders attended. Ms. Reeves presented them with some samples of opportunities within the downtown and what they could do to better utilize the existing buildings. • It was good information and people really liked her presentation. What actually happens, we will have to wait and see. • Ms. Reeves has a field trip scheduled for April 201h. Meet at City Hall at 11:00 a.m. and to return by 1:30 p.m. • Ms. Reeves should have some firm recommendations developed out of the meeting on Tuesday May 24th at 4:00 p.m. There will be money in the next CCDA budget to implement her recommendations. AGENDA ITEM #8: Commissioner Reports Sean briefed the Commissioners on the Facade Improvement joint Committee meeting. • A major result of that meeting was that we are going to keep it just on Main Street for one more year, then evaluate it. The thought was that since it's a relatively small amount of money, to concentrate it on Main Street where it's the most noticeable. • Another decision was to actively market the program to pay for smaller projects like paint and maybe two to three hours of architect time and fast track those projects. Commissioner Pao briefed the Commissioners on the Metro Climate Leadership Summit and how it dovetails with the urban renewal district mission. • It wasn't so much about urban renewal as it was about climate and how do we make these kinds of things come together at once. • They also talked about taxing vehicle mileage to encourage people to walk, bike, and use transit. CCAC Meeting Minutes for April 13,2011 Page 6 of 7 • They were looking for best practices and mixed-use development. AGENDA ITEM #9: Other Business Councilor Henderson handed out information on the genesis of the CCDA (Exhibit G). He indicated that there was one important document missing pertaining to the urban renewal being formed in 1989 (ordinance 89-11 he thinks). ® The next CCAC meeting they are hoping will be held at The Knoll at Tigard. • Tigard Chamber of Commerce is holding its Good Morning Tigard at the Knoll on Thursday April215C from 7:30 to 8:30. The Knoll grand opening is the same day from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. • Vice Chair Shearer handed out informational material on wall murals. Also, the Regional Arts Commission has a website that you can Google "Portland Art Murals" for a tour of all the different murals. Chemainus, British Columbia has another website that might be of interest. She would like to eventually promote wall murals in Tigard. AGENDA ITEM #10: Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. atty Lu sfor , CC_) Secolary A` TEST: Chair Thomas Murphy CCAC Meeting Minutes for April 13,2011 Page 7 of 7 A. Agenda Item #3 EXHIBIT Revised 4/12/11 Criteria for Plaza Location from Fanno Creek Park and Plaza Master Plano Connection to Fanno Creek Park (but necessarily adjacent) Adjacent property redevelopment potential Plaza developable in 5-10 year timeframe Proximity to Main Street or existing/future commercial businesses Number of community edges (roadways) Visibility (location is clear) CCAC additional criteria (from 3/9/11 meeting) Parking Multi-modal transportation access Needs to accommodate concerts Additional potential criteria: Usable size of property Improvement to Land Value Ratio Real market value Distance from Main Street Site would allow some compatibility with previous plaza design plan EXHIF.T B Agenda. ltem #4 Potential Process for Main Street public art 1. Preparation ® Set up ad hoc committee (CCAC representatives, Downtown business, artist) ® Meet v ith committee, planning, goal setting, prospectus development ® Determine potential sites in project area for art ® Notice to invite artist submittals 2. Artist Selection • Screen application materials with committee ® Artist proposal presentations ® Oversee final design for artist(s) selected 3. Contract ® Write and negotiate artists' contracts ® Monitor contracts ® Assist as needed in fabrication coordination with construction project ® Coordinate installation with artists and project ® Determine future, on-going maintenance needs for art work Agenda Item #4 EXI-11BIT C Patty Lunsford From: Sean Farrelly Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:24 PM To: Linli Pao Cc: Alexander Craghead; Alice Ellis Gaut (aegpro@gmail.com); Carolyn' 'Barkley (sixgiraffes@frontier.com); Elise Shearer; Patty Lunsford; Peter Louw; Phil Thornburg; Ralph Hughes; Tim Lehrbach; Tom Murphy Subject: RE-. agenda Hello- The cost for public art related to the Main Street project will come from the Urban Renewal funds that are providing a match to the Main Street green street project. There's currently no funds set aside for art in the rest of Downtown (although the gateways may include an art component.) The budget for Main Street public art is not firm, however a comparably scaled project, Portland's Kenton North Denver Ave, green street project had a public art budget of approximately $80,000. Here's a link that talks about it http://www.racc.org/public-art/new-public-art-unveiled- kenton-district The Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design plan includes a public art plan (p. 1-6 and 1-7), so any future decisions should be consistent with that. Thanks, Sean From: Linli Pao [mail''o:linlipao@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 2:12 PM To: Sean Farrelly Cc: Alexander Craghead; Alice Ellis Gaut (aegpro@gmail.com); Carolyn' 'Barkley (sixgiraffes@frontier.com); Elise Shearer; Patty Lunsford; Peter Louw; Phil Thornburg; Ralph Hughes; Tim Lehrbach; Tom Murphy Subject: Re: agenda Hi Sean, Just trying to save some time with a question- do we have "artist commissions" set aside? And, do we have the "thematic approach" already decided? Is that something (the thematic approach) that the CCAC would work on,'recommend? And what would the budget that we'd need to set aside for this kind of work look like? (On page I-2, it noted something about setting aside funding). Thanks! Linli On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Sean Farrelly <Seannti ar�gov> wrote: Hello, Your packets will be arriving either today or tomorrow. i For agenda item 4, Downtown Public Art,please review pages I-2 to I-7 in your copy of the Downtown Streetscape Plan. You should have either a hard or electronic copy of this, but in case you don't, I've attached the pages in question. Thanks, Sean Sean Farrelly Redevelopment Project Manager City of Tigard/City Center Development Agency 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR, 97223 503-718-2420 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 GN_Jjjjjjjj Design Frarneworiq Introduction for downtown was integral to the development of a Ephemeral outdoor projects A key step in completing the Downtown Streetscape Design Framework.The project team and the SWG Transit improvements Plan—location,access and Object-oriented works Design Plan was establishing a Design Framework for approached the question of theme as three interrelated station improvements for bus and commuter rail Performance art the public realm of downtown.The framework reflects parts.Each thematic part was considered as a basis of Street Lighting Plan—lighting types and spacing • Text-based works the Preferred Design Alternative from the Tigard design. (full lighting analysis can be found in the Project 0 Light and media works Downtown Improvement Plan(TDIP)and was Appendix memorandum titled Tigard Downtown Demonstration or community gardens developed during work sessions with the Streetscape Functional Design addresses safety,comfort and Streetscape Design Plan:Street Lighting Working Group(SWG).It provided a thematic basis access for users of the transportation system Recommendations by DKS Associates) Attempts to make public art uniform or singular in its for concept design to implement the TDIP vision. Green Heart addresses trees and landscaping, Street Tree Plan—spacing and canopy types theme are not encouraged.Art is a unique opportunity In any downtown revitalization effort vision cannot be connections to open spaces,and sustainability Street Connectivity—future roadway connections to step outside the conventional design vocabularies of the only element.The Design Framework focuses on • Artistic Representation addresses streetscape streetscape and public space.Through its diversity and specific downtown improvement projects. furnishings expressing a style or historic period Street connectivity was part of an overall traffic creative expression of ideas and themes it can heighten analysis for street function improvements.The analysis the experience of downtown and the interconnected • Streetscape Enhancements A palette of unifying elements for streetscape and addressed existing and future traffic conditions, flow of people. • Downtown Gateways gateway design was developed.The primary alternative transportation modes,functional • Public Spaces characteristics are texture,color,and form,suggesting requirements for street and intersection design,and it a a"family of materials"throughout the downtown area. recommended roadway connections.The full analysis _ The combination of specific materials may vary from can be found in the Project Appendix memorandum Each project is an opportunity for action.Over time, place to place but there should be a visually titled Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan: completed projects will represent a significant public recognizable consistency. Dl-affic Analysis for Street Function Improvements by investment in the downtown's public realm.Fully DKS Associates. �^ realizing the potential of downtown Tigard will also An overarching theme discussed with the SWG was _ 1 - require the City to become plan stewards by funding sustainability in the revitalization of downtown. Public Art Plan and creating project partnering opportunities for the Becoming a more sustainable society is another Public art can bring more vitality to the downtown urban renewal district,and by reexamining the City's unifying element for the specific themes and guiding experience by creating a set of interconnected places, zoning and development standards. principles of the TDIP,the Downtown Streetscape and emphasizing the flow of people,history,and Design Plan,and future economic development of nature.It can create a more memorable experience of _ Design Themes and Unifying Elements Tigard.Specific sustainable principles can include: street corridors,gateways and public spaces,which are Discussion and refinement of a general design theme key aspects of the public realm.The Public Art Plan J • Recognize mature,healthy trees as a high identifies three distinct areas within downtown for A meeting of the Streetscape Working Group performing environmental tool in the design tool complementary but slightly different types of public kit art: Make sustainable practices a visible educational tool Civic Art — t • Improve pedestrian access and circulation Main Street Art r r • Recognize environmental and social Green Heart Art sustainability provided by open spaces Emphasize green street stormwater management Implementing a public art program should include • Identify policy and development tools to assessing the potential for regional support and integrate sustainable systems funding,setting aside urban renewal funding for art, formalizing public art as part of the City's mission,and Functional Plans coordinating with local businesses.Implementing The Design Framework includes a series of functional actual artwork should emphasize a variety of artworks plans for the downtown area: and experiences. For example: • Pedestrian and Bike Plan—primary routes and . Project inspired by local history The Mayor of Tigard Addresses a Public Open House recommended street crossing improvements Ecological and nature-based art for the Downtown Streetscape Plan on May 25,2006 PROJECT AREAStreetscape City 1 of i-2 • ,Qk _J Design • THEMATIC ELEMENTS Theme as Functional Design Theme as Green Heart Theme as Artistic Representation Safety,Comfort and Access Open Space,Sustainability,Connections Style or Historic Period Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities: -Pedestrian Environment Trees and Landscaping s- Street Lighting -Walkability Connections to Public Spaces { Street Furnishings -Bike Travel Connections to Fanno Creek -Sidewalk Paving -Access to Transit Sustainability -Public Art -On-Street Parking Public Art -Traffic Calming Implementation: Implementation: Street Design Concepts Implementation: Street Design Gateways/Public Spaces -Street Design Concepts -Green Street Guidelines Transit Functional Plan -Pedestrian/Bike Plan Gateways/Public Spaces -Public Spaces/Gateways -PedestrianSike Functional Plan -Transit Functional Plan Connections to Public Spaces -Street Lighting Functional Plan -Unifying Materials Palette �f x >w 1 • 1-3 Design r • 1 Guiding Principles Streetscape furnishings are finishing touches for"place making."They create a human scale and help to identify different functional areas of the streetscape.Complementary C1aSS1Ca1 Style furnishings based on guidelines from the Unifying Elements will provide a thematic consistency that is a key implementing principle for the Downtown Streetscape Design Plan. Preferred as the dominant theme in streetscapes and gateways Information kiosks and signage are opportunities to incorporate furnishing characteristics into other visible elements of the streetscape.Signage may be developed with unique architectural forms and materials or grouped with information kiosks. Kiosks Iry _ can use ns architectural form suggestive of - other conspicuous forms such the commuter rail station.Consideration should also be given to masonry pole bases for the conventional types of street and traffic signs. Contemporary- \ As an example,pole bases could be complementary to the columns and walls of Art Style _-- •. nearby Gateway designs. NORLimited use as a counterpoint to classical style in streetscapes and gateways Naturalistic I Style Applicable in Fanno Creek area,Commercial St.gateway • • r • r and public areas 1 I-4 Design Frameworq TE �I�RE � . Key Themes Concrete pavers Sidewalks,gateways,public Unifying elements for downtown spaces streetscapes,gateways and public spaces are Stone Gateways,public spaces intended� to express the themes of an urban (especially Fanno Creek) village and a"green heart."The emphasis on Compacted gravel Public spaces(especially Fanno - one theme over another may vary from street Creek)and Gateways to street,gateway to gateway and among the 4 _ Decorative metals Bridge/overlook railings,barrier key public spaces.However,a unifying fencing,street furnishings Palette of s colors and forms suggests is a"family of places"and the visual interest Color. Color is a visually unifying element CO L d FORM found in diversity of design. linked to textural materials.Colors tie together spaces separated by distance and <• Texture: Texture can be a unifying element function.Black is recommended as a unifying N1 z 1 through a simple and consistent palette of color for streetscape furnishings and i materials for paving,walls,columns and decorative railings.Complimentary colors of `L railings.The materials may be used in grays and reds/oranges can be found in the varying combinations as part of streetscape selection of sidewalk/gateway paving, t and gateway designs. gateway columns,walls and naturalistic stone work utilizing locally available basalt or Material Application similar material. Scored concrete Sidewalks,crosswalks,gateways Pervious concrete Sidewalks,gateways,public Plant Materials are an important color and spaces textural element as well,providing the t unifying appearance of green(especially in T i the street tree canopy)and seasonal change through flowers,fall foliage and colorful ��_ j I•: I' winter stems and branches. �— - T-4 XB/* Form: Fomr can provide both visual unity 3s � and interesting visual distinction.Form,along with color and texture,provides a sense of a't� orientation for downtown and serves as visible landmarks.The preferred form for - downtown is the"classic"or"traditional" ^••`* _ `� style,particularly with regard to streetscape n furnishings. However,more naturalistic 7• forms may also be appropriate at gateways or t i1t within the public spaces,especially near Fanno Creek. Public Art:Public is an opportunity to explore the use of key textures, complementary textures not found in other streetscape or gateway elements,and provide enjoyable elements of surprise in form or interpretation of themes. 1 I-5 CIVIC ART n -Large scale gateway artwork or water feature visible from a car -Reinforce Hunziker intersection realignment -Reinforce civic themes like governance p. MAIN STREET ART Mark gateways at 99W with sculpture or water feature to invite travelers on to Main Street n r >" , p •' -Commuter rail station:clock tower or { * vertical artwork visible from 99W }s4 �.• -Art Walk:smaller scale sculpture along - Main Street ...•. ,�.,, +� -Enhance functional elements to enrich pedestrian experience ' GREEN HEART ART -Art with natural materials and themes to draw connection to Fanno Creek 7 +r -Environmental themes create and support education and stewardship r Art that creates habitat,engages all ages, and can be interactive -Water feature can create a visual link to Fanno Creek Art supports creation of public spaces for events Demonstration garden to model "green"practices and enrich pedestrian experience k i I-6 Design Framework, C MAIN STREET ART CIVIC ART GREEN HEART ART Y �••� j• Ste' Examples of how the scale and character of art could vary among the art districts of • • . • downtown.Exact art pieces will be developed through artist commissions and thematic appropriateness. • I-7 Design Framework Streetscape Design Concepts (this project) Future Street Improvements Gateway Design Concepts ♦� - / O (this project) ♦ ♦ / 1 Future Gateways " ♦ ♦♦ Fanno Creek Master Plan ♦; ' �;♦ ♦ _ � s^,.\ ♦ �I ♦ + !� � I � Green Corridor Urban Creek � � �� ♦., . Imo':- ♦ ♦ % I. ♦ `�' 'o �♦ ♦ .�r Neighborhood Park 01 / N Multi Use Trail 4.i \ 40000040 0 Ncw Railroad Crossing City of1 I-8 • -Mn City of Tigardmrea u.rerjn sueet U, Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 nOAC� Meetings gS �Parkd`ng Dico "oar, Group Par;kingg, Managerialgit Gv&-,Fp r E Ow."O cll d Ilea G6d ReporE I . I 'Parking Andysis M Preliminary Der�gG MP Des�,01'1 . r�!A•rYc Co"n3 , aAN w.Ugard-or.gov/mainstrm- Agenda Item #5 iNDEX OF SHEETS "soR-- I STATE OF OREGON 11 TtUe Sh IIA I Sheet index Contd k Slid. Nae...t R'TMENT OF •TRANSPORTATION DEPAT PLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, &PAVEMENT MARKINGS MAIN ST: nyrib JOHNSON ST - TIGARD ST (TIGARD) MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY OVERALL LENGTH OF PROJECT 0.28 MILES MARCH 2012 ATTENTION-- Oregon Low Requires You To Follow Rules Adopted By The Oregon Utility Notification Center. Those Rule.Are Set'V'T OAR 952-001-0010 Through OAR.52 .1 .,.s By Coling.R. 0. You May Obtain Copies Of The R The Cen ler. (Note: Number For L The......Utility C ant Is $03)232-1987.) END OF PROJECT LETS ALL X-STP-7365(009) WORK TOGETHER TO MAKE THIS STA: 14+00.00 JOB SAFE SW CO T WS RD SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.I W. PI I S TANG A Po Oso P N 0 T OREGON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION r3oil Achlermon�97T Michael Neson KE- Nelson N TFR joric.yfil— 001J.S�R At..Brown C..SWER u C, a vid Lohn,an cOwuISSMER MoIth- Co'rell L. MECTOR OF 1RANSPd70. FIFE. PROJECT These plans were developed using AASHTO design standards. Exceptions to these standards,if any,have been submitted ON, and approved by the ODOT Chief Engineer or their delegated 0 LOCATION authority. C? rr Q0 9r NJS P' By: Tig.,d Signature&date ..... ..... Uj LU BEGINNING OF PROJECT Print name and title X-STP-7365(009) (D STA: 0+00.00 Concurrence by ODOT Chief Engineer PUBLIC ROADWAY r.6 MPROVEMENTS MAIN ST-JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) WCINiTY MAP MAIN STRIEET co SCALE: I" = 1500' FEDERALTRGHWA MOJECT NUWaER SH ET ADMINIS"ATION Mo. SH :MR. OREGON X-STP-7365(009) it 11��Ml DIVISION I I L— EXHIBIT E INDEX OF SHEETS OOHT'D OREGON STANDARD DRG. NOS. vlEEr xo. ocsonPnw RD250 Thrust Blocking IIA-11 Index of Plan Sheets RD254 Hydrant Installation 1A-2 General Notes RD30Street cut Trench ckflll.Bedding,Pipe Zone And t1ultiplo Inuto,tions 1A-3 General Notes RD336 Standard Storm Sewor Manhole 2A to 2A-1 Typical Sections RD342 Shallow Manhole RD356 Manhole Covers and Fromm 2C to 2C—X Traffic Control Plan RD350 Manhole Frame AdN.tment 2D Pipe Data Sheet RD70D Curbs 3 Main Street Sto.00+00.00 to Sta 1+90.30 Plan RD720 SideWolks Details 4 Main Street Sta.1+90.30 to Ste.4+92.98 Plan RD75Sidewalk Ramp RD757 Sidewalk RwPlacement Placement Cptlons Curb RadH>15' 5 Main Street Sta.4+92.98 to Sta 7+94.66 Plan RD759 Truncated Dome Detectabla Wcming Surface 6 Main Street Sta.7+94.66 to Sta 10+96.88 Plan RD1010 Inlet Protection(Type 1, P.&3) I 7 Main Street Sta 10+96.88 to Sta.14+00.00 Plan Ru1015 Inlet Protection(Type 4)BiefHter Bags 1 GA to GA-6 Erosion Control Plat and Details TM500 Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks M TMS01 Pavement Marking Standard Dotall Blocks 6 GJ to GJ-4 Stormwater Plan TM502 Pavement Marking Standard Detae Blocks I GN to GN-4 Landscape Plan TM503 Pavement Marking Standard Detail Blocks S to S-4 Striping Plan TM530 Intersection Pavement Markings(Crossuolk,Stop Bar,&Bike Lane Stencil) I-0001 to 1-0002 tin Plan TM800 Tables,Abrupt edge And PCMS Details TM821 Temporary Sign Supports TM840 Closure Details 7MB50 2—Lane,2—way Roadways I G TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND PROPOSED LEGEND STORM SEWER UNEPPOPOSEO STORM SEWER LINE W UNDERGROUND WATER UNE SAN SANITARY SEWER UNE ® PROPOSED STORM M—OLE 3t OVERHEAD WRE a G UNDERGROUND GAS UNE O PROPOSED PERFORATED PIPE o CHAINLINK FENCE LINE ————— PROPOSED CLEANOUT OR STANDPIPE J E UNDERGROUND POWER UNE F" T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE/FO UNELU PROPOSED NRB C? PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6 SS SANITARY SEWEROLE � IRRIGATION VALVE SD lY SPRINKLER HEAD PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY STORM SEWER MANHOLE Z Q ['`j IRRIGATION METER CATCH BASIN PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS OITCH INLET CABLE TELEVISION RISER © CURB INLET POTTER RISER ® PROPOSED WATER DUALITY PLANTINGS u TELEPHONE RISER = e ROOF BRAN GOWN SPOUT GAS RISER PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS U) QI' WATER VALVE w GAS VALVE CEJ CT - FIRE HYDRANT I0 GAS METER Q ISI. WATER METER CAS STAND PIPE V FIRE DEPT.CONNECTIONGASw UTILITY POLE g WRIER STAND PIPE GUY WIRE F F WATER VAULT ((�� FO UNKNOWN UV.ITY MANHOLE CJ SHRUB/BUSH LU P UNKNOWN STAND PIPE CONIFEROUS TREE W O UNKNOWN UTILITY VAULT UNKNOWN UTILITY RISER EC; a OEPDu0U5 TREE BOLLARD Harper Hoof Peterson Ri&Tis Inc. ` i TE - O PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS C> MAIA ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(TIGARD) TRAIN STREET I Wrseecrox wuKTY 4 FEDERAL HIGHWAHWA X-STP-7365(009) NO, Y SHEET t� ADMRWST AA�,4' 9s p p 9:' OREGON SHEETIHDEXCONT•D& 1A DIVISION STD.DRG.NOS. SEC,t,T.2 S.,R.1 V1. I I 7 3 4 5 6 r 0 44;40 `> y GA-4, GJ-4, GN-4, S-4, 1-0002 GA, GJ, GN, S, 1-0001 GA-1, GJ-1, GN-1, S-1, 1-0001 GA-2, GJ-2, GN-2, S--2, 1-0002 GA-3, GJ-3, 31 S— , —0002 3 X Z H W W 19 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LU 0 10D ,ED PROF�s Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. _ 63 sOA,r:,-_100V sv�11,863��Cf) s/� MAIN ST:JOHNNSONPUBLICWST ITIGARD ST MPROVEMCr GLAND) MAIN STREET k 0 n ° ° , WASHINGTON CCUNP.' O S ry APPROVED BY: CAA HFAT 24`g0 DESIGNED BY: JDW C C) DRAFTED BY: JDW 60 C? qRy q1 FS INDEX Of PIAN SHEETS SHT NO. to-1 EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.00+00.00 TO STA.14+00.00 a CITY OF TIGARD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES CITY OF T♦GARD GE iMAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONT GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES. 1. THE CITY'S STANDARD SPECIFICA77ON FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL !S "MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC 15. EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AND CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, U.S. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, FHWA, 1988 ED. MAINTAINED MEETING THE D.E.Q. REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY MAY AT ANY TIME ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFEC77VE EROSION CONTROL. 2. .TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR BY TN.E CONTRACTOR IN. ACCORDANCE NTH ruE rITY'c STANDARD SPECIFICATION AND, ALSO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CITY (JOB SPECIFIC) APPROVED TRAFFIC 16. PROPERTY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE SEEDED WITH A STANDARD GRASS MIX; CONTROL PLAN. A COPY OF THE APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE SHRUBS, FLOWERS REINSTALLED , EXl EPA SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, MAILBOXES, ETC. SHALL BE WORK AREA. REESTABLISHED, REINSTA[.LED OR REPLACED, WITH LIKE KIND AND MATERIAL. 17. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK 3. PUBLIC ROADWAY SHALL NOT BE CLOSED TO TRAFFIC, AT ANY TIME, Wl7HOUT HAVING FIRST OBTAINED SITE AND SHALL BE SO ROUTED THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, PUBLIC PROPERTY AND THE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY ENGINEER. THE PERMIT HOLDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVISION OF RECEIVING SYSTEM IS NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE CITY MAY AT ANY TIME ORDER CORRECTIVE TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW DISRUPTIONS TO AREA WIDE EMERGENCY SERVICES (TIGARD ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL. POLICE DEPT., TUALATIN FIRE & RESCUE) AND TO TRI—MET AND 77GARD AND BEAVERTON SCHOOL 18 .EXCAVATOR(S) MUST COMPLY WITH O.R.S.757.541 THROUGH 757.571; EXCAVATOR(S) SHALL NOTIFY DISTRICT. ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LINE LOCATIONS 72 HOURS (MIN.) PRIOR TO START OF WORK. DAMAGE TO 4. ADVANCE WARNING OF IMMINENT TRAFFIC DISRUP77ON SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE GENERAL MOTORING UTILITIES SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE PERMIT HOLDERS' EXPENSE. PUBLIC BY PLACEMENT OF AN ADVANCE NOTIFICATION SIGN AT EACH END OF THE CONSTRUC77ON AREA 19. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL EXISTING U77LITIES FOR BOTH VER77CAL ELEVA77ON AND HORIZONTAL 72.HOURS (MIN.) BEFORE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION WORK. LOCATION PRIOR TO START OF WORK (POTHOLE BEFORE DIGGING IF NECESSARY). SHOULD CONFLICTS ARISE AND REDESIGN OR RELOCATION OF FACIL177ES BE NECESSARY, IT SHALL BE DONE AT THE PERMIT 5. ACCESS TO EXISTING PROPER77ES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES, INCLUDING NORMAL DELIVERY HOLDERS EXPENSE. CHANGES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY IN ADVANCE OF WORK PERFORMANCE. SERVICE AND MAIL SERVICE AND IF NOT, SHALL BE CAUSE FOR WORK STOPPAGE UNTIL EFFECTIVE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK WITH AFFECTED UTILITY AGENCIES. ACCESS IS ESTABLISHED. 6. TRAFFIC IC CONTROL DEVICES, FLAGPERSONS ETC., SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO INITIATION OF 20. A TEMPORARY HARD—SURFACE PATCH (COLD MIX AC OR HOT MIX BASE PAVING) SHALL BE PLACED CONSTRUC77ON WORK AND SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY MAINTAINED. ON TRENCHES WITHIN ROADWAYS AT THE END OF EACH DAYS WORK. NO TRENCH, ON SITE OR OFF—SITE, SHALL BE LEFT AT ANY TIME IN AN UNSAFE CONDITION. THE PERMIT HOLDER IS 7. NO WORK WILL BE PERMITTED DURING THE HOURS OF DARKNESS, NOR BETWEEN 7.00 P.M. TO 7.00 RESPONSIBLE FOR AND IS LIABLE FOR HAZARDS OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE PROSECU77ON OF A.M., SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. THE WORK. 8. MINIMUM TRAVEL LANE WIDTH SHALL BE TWELVE (12) FEET,• PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL SHALL ALSO BE 21. WORK PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE PERMIT SHALL INCLUDE REPAIR OF EXISTING FACILITIES (ROADS, PROVIDED FOR. DITCHES ETC.) AS MAY BE NECESSARY, IN THE CITY INSPECTORS OPINION, TO OVERCOME DETERIORATION OR DAMAGE WHICH OCCURRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE WORK AUTHORIZED BY THE 9. THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADD TO OR MODIFY TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS AS MAY BE PERMIT. CORRECTIVE WORK SHALL BE DONE AT THE PERMIT HOLDERS' EXPENSE. NECESSARY TO EFFECTIVELY CONTROL TRAFFIC AND TO ASSURE PUBLIC SAFETY 22. ONE AS—BUILT MYLAR DRAWING SNOWING ALL NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING ANY REVISION 3 IOBEFORE INITIATING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE PERMIT HOLDER SHALL CONTACT THE CITY'S MADE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND, ALSO, ANY IMPROVEMENT WHICH MAY v/i PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER, (,639-4171) TO ESTABLISH A PLACE, TIME, AND DATE FOR A IMPACT AN EXISTING PUBLIC SYSTEM OR FACILITY, SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY BY A REGISTERED ui PRE—CONSTRUC7701V MEETING. CIVIL ENGINEER ALONG WITH AN ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION OF INSTALLATION COMPLIANCE (FORM O ATTACHED). Z 11.THE PERMIT HOLDER OR HIS CONTRACTOR SHALL N077FY THE CITY'S INSPECTOR AT 639-4171 Lu TWENTY—FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, TWENTY—FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO ANY STAGED INSPECTION (SEE ATTACHED LISTING) AND AFTER COMPLE77NG WORK COVERED BY THE PERMIT � �— QCA L 12.A COPY OF THE PERMIT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS, AND A COPY OF THE APPROVED CONSTRUC77ON C> PLAN AND ALL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE WORK AREA. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM OREGON DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION P= TO THE PERMIT TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS AND TO THE CITY APPROVED PERMIT PLANS, AND ir Z5 APPROVED PLAN AMENDMENTS AND TO THE CITY'S STANDARDS AND SPECIFICA71ONS AND TO THESE H er Houf Peterson Ri hellis Inc. Lu GENERAL CONDITIONS. CHANGES TO ANY OF THE AFORESAID MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY, INuj `��p PAOFFs '_" ��»-•�•""w-��,°-�-_� _`' ADVANCE OF WORK PERFORMANCE. �g �'/� PUBLIC ROPMAY IMPROVENENTS co 13.MAIN7ENANCE OF THE WORK AREA AND APPROACH ROADS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMIT �V w�11,863�'A � ANAINST:JONNSMONN��OST(TiGARD) 3: HOLDER. THE WORK AREA AND APPROACH ROADS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN CONDITION, FREE 4 Q APPROVED BY: GAA � WASHING=coY o FROM OBSTRUC77ONS AND HAZARDS. A COPY OF THE PERMIT HOLDERS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Igi urcl Co SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE WORK AREA. `Pfpr 24,o'�ry\ DESCNED BY: JLW , 14.THE SPREADING OF MUD OR DEBRIS OR STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT OF ANY KIND UPON DRAFTED BY: JDW C? ANY PUBLIC ROADWAY 1S STRICTLY PROHIB17ED AND VIOLATION SHALL BE CAUSE FOR IMMEDIATE F 04 A4 S� GENERALNOTES "O.T 0 CANCELLATION OF THE PERMIT. THE CITY MAY AT ANY TIME ORDER IMMEDIATE CLEAN UP AND 1A-2 a STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH CLEAN UP. �'Dnzas` tz/aI/I' CITY OF 77CAM GENERAL CONS77?UC770N N07ES CONT GENERAL NOTES: NOTE. 23. A SEWER SYSTEM AIR—TEST AND (V.H.S.) TV TEST REPORT AND ONE SET OF BLUELINE "AS—BUILTS" IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE 77GARD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND THE (OF EITHER OR BOTH THE STORM AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS) MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY FOR 2008 OREGON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, THE 2008 OREGON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONNECTION OF ANY BUILDINGS TO THE SEWER SYSTEM. PRECEDENCE. 24. THE PERMIT HOLDERS ENGINEER/INSPECTOR SHALL SUBMIT DAILY INSPECTION REPORTS, ON A WEEKLY BASIS, TO THE CITYS INSPECTOR. (SEE DEVELOPER — ENGINEER AGREEMENT NOTE 15.) 25. THE CITYS INSPECTORS MAY, AT THEIR DISCRETION, REQUIRE PROVISION OF TESTS AND OR REPORTS FROM THE PERMIT HOLDER, PERMIT HOLDERS ENGINEER OR CONTRACTOR TO VALIDATE CLAIMS OF MATERIAL OR CONSTRUCTION ADEQUACY/COMPLIANCE. SUCH TESTS/REPORTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE PERMIT HOLDERS' EXPENSE. 26. THE PERMIT HOLDER SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF A PROPERLY EXECUTED RELEASE AND WAIVER , DOCUMENT TO THE CITY FOR EACH OWNERSHIP DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, AS EVIDENCE OF DISTURBANCE RESOLUTION AND OWNER SATISFACTION. 27. EXISTING MONUMENTS, PROPERTY CORNERS, AND SURVEY MARKERS SHALL BE PROTECTED. REPLACEMENT SHALL BE AT THE PERMIT HOLDERS'EXPENSE. 28. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOTIFY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR WHEN THE INITIAL AND FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT HAS BEEN PLACED. 29. THE PERMIT HOLDER SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY INSPECTOR, IN WRITING, THE NAMES AND 24 HOUR EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER OF TWO (2) PERSONS WHO HAVE AUTHORITY TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS, TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND, IN GENERAL, KILL 8£RESPONSIBLE 1N CASE OF ANY EMERGENCY. THE PERMIT HOLDER SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY INSPECTOR, IN WRITING, OF ANY/ALL ASSIGNMENT CHANGES. 30. THE PERMIT HOLDER SHALL CAUSE HIS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TO THE CITY INSPECTOR, IN WRITING, THE NAME AND 24 HOUR EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER OF A DESIGNATED "COMPETENT PERSON" RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY AS PER OR—OSHA, CHAP.437, DIV.3 CONSTRUCTION, SUB—DIVISION P —EXCAVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL N077FY THE CITY INSPECTOR OF ANY/ALL ASSIGNMENT CHANGES. 3 31. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMIT HOLDER TO PROVIDE FOR PROPER RIGHT—OF—ENTRY C6 AND/OR EASEMENTS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. PROOF OF RIGHT—OF—ENTRY OR PROPERLY EXECUTED Lu EASEMENTS, SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL IN NO WAY BE CONSTRUED TO BE O LIABLE FOR THE PERMIT HOLDERS FAILURE TO OBTAIN OR PROVIDE FOR PROOF OF RIGHT—OF—ENTRY OR z EASEMENTS. z Lu c? 32. BEFORE PLACEMENT OF THE FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT, THE PERMIT HOLDER SHALL CLEAN AND HAVE THE CITY COMPLETE A PRE—ACCEPTANCE VIDEO INSPECTION OF ALL NEW SEWER LINES. THE PERMIT RT � gA({ ! HOLDER SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY WlTN 30 DAYS OF NOTICE FOR THE VIDEO INSPECTION. ANY �elNi @-J�w �'•si'.�� DEFICIENCIES SHALL BE REPAIRED BEFORE PLACEMENT OF FINAL LIFT. CD OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION w "Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. ,`CEO PADFFs� tt ,. �:.,�, ' m 5 G I N E PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS y Q� w-11,8&3`�4' MAIN ST:JOHN MAIN STTE�D ST(TIGARD) o WASHINGTON COU. to APPROVED BY. CPP, SFpT 24,'1''0`L DESIGNED BY: JDW G' 0� P:AFTED BY: JDW qRY A1.FS GENERAL NOTES sNO EXPIRES: 12/31/11 1A-3 f31 FINISHED GRADE OF PLANTER �um HOODED OVERFLOW 4" WIDE OPENING 6' O.C. 4" SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER 2.5' TYPICAL 12" MAX (REQUIRED 1N FRONT OF PLANTER ONLY WITH CURB CUTS FOR ENTRANCE FLOW AGGREGATE BASE NOMINAL COMPACTION THICKNESS 3" e• WA :tee, � D,• e. \\jv j\\s\ e FACILITYOTOPSOILER z RD 700 28" STD. CURB " T" SLOPE AS NECESSARY TO WASHED CRUSHED ROCK MAINTAIN NATIVE SOIL. SLOPE AS NECESSARY TO NATIVE SOIL MAINTAIN NATIVE SOIL. (NO EXCAVATION) NA 77 i SOIL ION) 12" OF WASHED 12" — 6" SCHED. 40 PVC 6" J" DRAIN ROCK (MIN) PCRFORA TED PIPE DISCHARGES TO 12" OR 10" STORM LINE. STORM SYSTEM) DEPTH & LOCATION WILL TYPICAL. STORMWATER PLANTER VARY. a MM EXISTING SUBGRADE z 0 0 Lu J 0 U } H N 30% SUBMIT! "., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION co _ `�Q,EO PROFFs, �—Hamer Houf Peterson Rl$iTellis Inc." MIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS w11,863 MAIN ST:JOHNSONMAIN STREET D ST(TIGARD) �p ::s+Mcrou team oI� APPROVED BY: GAA 'rFpT 24'�p91• DESIGNED BY: JDW co A0 BY: JDW C? �'qRY AtFS� Hoer 0 TYPICAL SECTIONS 2A-1 EXPiREB: 1.2/31/11 a a�,az N- a :, ajSE C� 0. <33 W �_ �Z F O :y a 0 oa)_ ® �% Q c� Z J J O U p Y p 0 J U ~ h Ch h Q \ ri ri a a 4 Z -- J h 4 h ICY U b y J CN 2 N Q 1 J OD cr o � W 'd w z (� LLJ O J O v1 O W In O O N -d �z ti a Lu v O M N K h� N Y R G 3 p U U W Q J h O ti Q f< pU a W z ti J h C) W U U p d. N MP N01103S 1V01d ki-VZ'90JI11S133HS SSJM4-90JI1190-JIi1:d 6 PIPE USE INSTALLATION CRITERIA �Ma, ALTERNATE MATERIALS APPURTENANCES ERTENSlg1 TMUTwML+T HELICAL CORRUGATED METAL RIGID SPECIAL MANHOLES INLETS rn P�-'R� ALUMINUM ALUMINIZED OR GALVANIZED IRON AND STEEL RE-WOEILaTE tMIG TY CIRCULAR OR ELLIPTICAL Eu CROSS- �5 LT. W 2 SIZE OF CORRUGATIONS SIZE OF CORRUGATIONS RAM �• $ 2 a: -o. RIVETED,WEIDm OR LOCK SEAM LOO($EAN RIVETED,WELDED OR LOCK SEAM LOCK SEAM a-_ op SECTIONAL'p'f- C b o i s �r Z = I/t'x I •zlr 3'z . 1.M MIL�t RB 'x x 1 3'x 1'[a11MG 9.'OOM IML 9@H IW aMllC =is�sr N g 512E m(Inches) DIMENSIONS o = W h. RITEEll RAR § RAR VY al. IP M 1P' g 8.11E MUTE RATE'a o-6< 1h 0Y( S IgS y 3 8 10 12 15 18 29 SPAK msE ` c tm rtpa< tIK1L — — I M••r IY ac � TMs a M01 era 61�9 �� Ir nc ��- _ '�� y $�� >a � REMARKS R aADl� 3' � '�� w aw �v` I a M edaae a l is exty LENGTH IN FEET Nm(F.11F«t-NNea eh 6 i ¢I�T r�i, ai LL W'Ga �` " N , RAZE i1Nt OWN IMT RATE Tical Mir = s g o f•Bo 2 3 1 3 1 2 31 2 3 1 3 3 XX 1 PL 4 3 X 19 1 IPLI 6 4 h LU W W Q Q O W o_ CL 0 GENERAL NOTES pG-oss-sections Shope of pro.norma to longitudinal NOTE: �� i)• Ni „rL_, cv 1.A check(d)indicates column heading ozia,prior to loading This is a list of the most common drainage Standard Drowings used on proiects. It does not Contain sanitory sewer drawings. applies. A=P'pa-Arch nor does it contain the more unique drainage hems. Consult the construction notes for all standard drawing references. 2.A new uipa wtvert installotian shall be of like R a Round teriaT throughout. E=Olipli<vl(SX nominal elongoUan) ® RD300 Trench Baekril6 Bedding,Pipe Zone And ❑110346 Largge Precast Manhole Ir OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION J.Eztenslon f exisln meld wiverts may be of Multiple Instaliotians ❑RD348 Manhde Ylth Inlet F-- nuke metol or cortugaUona Fa connecting 4�Minimum aiwvable diameter for Class i O 110302 Street L1t ❑ 110352 Outside Drop Manhole. tolls sea Standard U No.RD326. nonreinforve0 eonoele pipe is 15. O RD304 Mch Pipe Elackfll/ComPoclian O 110356 Monhd.Covers Md From fn 4.D'unenalun,shown are npmhld. O RD312 Subsurface Oran 0 RD358 Monhae slap.Prat-tons Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. H 5.All pi shall conform to the AASHTO Q Abbreviations for proo__t�eetive coatings far metal DIDa 0 IR 314 Open Grade HMAC Drainage Detals ❑R0360 Monhae Frame Ad),stment - — W sp.a..tion applicable for the type of materia PM=Paymeric,A'cth tiw coat both sides 0 RD316 Slop ed Ends For Mekol P' O RD364 Concrete Inlets T es G-i,G-2&G-2M (�r. h— W and the diameter of the pipe inwlved. PO=PdyethMene inside lining,polymeric outside 0 RD318 SW Ends Far Concrete Pipe ❑RD386 Concrete Inlets ma CG-1.CG-2 �Mn = U=Uncoataedd 0 RD320 Ppvgtl�rtd Slop.For Culverts And Curb Inlet Charms VV'' ii77 qM=Chevron.i duatriol membrane 5-0 Maxnnum PiDa Size O RD368 Concrete Inlets Type ME,M-0,B Md B-SL PUBLIC ROADWAYINPROVEPAENTS FOO7NOTE5: Fq=Epoxy coaled 0 RD322 Sofaty End Section Metol Pipe D RD370 Ditch Inlet Type b G 11,863 MAIPo ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD Cn 0 RD324 Safe' End Section Concrete Ppe 0 RD 72 Concrete Inla a Type 01 Field CV w '9 `, C9 QQ Design height of cover is the critical design ©Abbreviations far existing pipe materiels 0 RD$b Coup�ng Bands For Corru�otad Netol Pipe 0 RD374 Meo Drainage Resin Or Fisd enlel Q FAIN STREET height use4 to select pipe materials. The height AB=Asbestos cement 0 RD 28 Slot etl C.M.P.Drain Oetas 0 RD376 Miseeloneoua Dru-.a a Structures f cawe for on a len run of pipe mo ce, NEIN ��,.� vP WASHINGTON COUNTY YY y vary. AN=Cortugated aluminum 0 RD328 Natal Pipe S!o^ 4ndlvrs S-hr..E'.ox t' Cc (f (jrj O Design height aE cover shall be measured to Co=Concrete 0 RD336 StondarE St.—Sower Manhse 0 R0380 Ful ieight Table-Alum.A Steel Cornu9 ted _ LI subgrade. PI=Plastic O RD Stone Sewer Pollution Control Manhole 0 110382 F1 Haight Table-Alum.8 Steel Pipe And+ APPROVED DESIGNED BY: GAA p St Corrugated steal 0 RDJ42 Shallow Monholes 0 RD384 Fill Height Table-Alum. Steel Spiral Rib Pipe S ry Cr pGoss-sectional dimensions may vary with X=Other malena1.see remarks column 0 RD344 Standard 4B"Diameter Manhole 0 R0386 Fill Height Table-Concrete Pip. eoT 24 DRAFTED BY: JDW JDw different matenols.When golwnized zon or sten Bose Section and aluminum ore acceptable oltemates use a rp separate line for each type of material. GARY ALSO SHEET 0 PIPE DATA SHEET 2D t` EXPIRES: 12/31/11 d SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. 0. 5 2 — 3 a O CONSTRUCT STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER- o 02 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB TYPE C. 30% UB 7+; C7 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 77[[-- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Inc- F- 4 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK RAMP. `Harper HoT Peterso>�Righ'Ilis Inc. I.I.I o ,o �o O QED FIR - � O CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH AS SHOWN OR �5G I NP `r`��p PUSUCROADWAYIMPROVEMENTS zb- ac r- :u G MAIN ST.JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST IGARD DIRECTED. SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTIS77NG SURFACE AS cc, 11,863 0 y (T ) e MAIN STREET REQUIRED WASHINGTON COUNTY v 19 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE CCNCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON `OREGON APPROVED e�: GAA F SHEET X.X. r 2a,�e ti N � DESIGNED 8Y, JD* DRAFTED SY: JCN 9 cgRY At F�'� GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN NO. EXPIRES: 12/;S1/I1 STA.0+00.00 TO STA.1+90.30 3 2 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. 77GARD CYCLE 1 12551 DOUBLE J CACHE LI ACCUPUNCTURE AYES LABS PIPERS PLACE 12575 l 12571 12543 12549 _AJ F— L 5 2 4' 1 19 TYP 31 TYP 3+0 7- 0 4+00 8 00 5 19 TYP 3 j m 7 4 -E- B PRO DESIGN SOLUTIONS K�7 MAX'SMAXS BREW Pb 12568 72566 3 4 30% 'SUBMITTA-11v 01CONSTRUCT STANDARD CURB AND CUTTER. O CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB TYPE C. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O Ir CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SIDEWALK. Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. 4/4 uj w 04 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK RAMP. :z GIN PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 9 SAWCUT AND REMOVE Ci y11,863 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH AS SHOWN OR DIRECTED. MAIN STREET Q) 1p (�) Ex1sT1suNG SURFACE AS REQUIRED. WASHINGTON COMM Y 20 MjNA co 18 EXISTING BRIDGE IMPACT PANEL. 04d N ADPROVE0 W: GAA Ar DESGN�:D BY! OW 19 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE CONCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET X.X. 249Ary DRA;'TED BY. 4W -SHEET co GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN no 31 9 CONSTRUCT PEDISTRIAN CRATE. rEXPIRES. 12/01/11 STA.1+90.30 TO STA.4+92.98 4 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. HILLERS EMBLEM A TASTE OF HEAVEN AUTOMOTIVE DRIVE7RAIN PERMA—TREAT 77CARD CLEANERS K£PLERS 12537 12535 12533 12525 12519 UPHOLSTERY _ }w��•' _ _.— _= _ __.-- 12511 _ 0 -r7,71 19 lw'P 1 31 TYP 3 = 19 TYP .31 TYP 31 TYP 1 3 —3 --� _ 4,�--_- --- 5 --------- — — g TYP 1 3 7:77 - _,..—_.r a' •. ._--=_ J�'�..yi+�ss. _i ` j•———— _. ice.-eam' ._ ,. 1 I A—BOY — -- POWELL PAINT CENTER — 12550 12540 v ( CONSTRUCT STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER. CD i CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB TYPE C. 30% ll t: 0OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SIDEWALK. Ha er Houf Peterson Righellis Inc._ Lu 04 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK RAMP. � �0 PROFFs =n OS CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH AS SHOWN OR 0!RECTED. SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTISTING SURFACE G ��i NES S/� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS •. �' AS REQUIRED. w 11,863 p MAIN ST:JOHNSONMAIN T-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) EET in CONSTRUCT RAISED CROSSWALK. `i fi`+ k '- WASHINGTON COUNTY 18 EXISTING BRIDGE IMPACT PANEL. ZORLIG014 AVSIGNED BY: CAA DWc �9�ry O PRO ED BY. .row24• DW7ED BY: .DVI 19CONSTRUCT 2' RIDE CONCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET X.X. AIF S�� v+3 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN w� 31 CONSTRUCT PEDISTRIAN GRAIE. 5 EXPIRES I2/3I/11STA.4+92.98 TO STA.7+94.66 a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. SUB—SHOP TYLER'S AUTOMOTIVE KISS CAR WASH 12511 124;35 1 _— 12475 I I c �_s+Y 11n" _ _ T/ 1— // -�.•Z74..-.- NY SPS.. i- �/ d0+00 J u 1 1 TYP.` 1 ul TYP^ 3 r r 1 y - 31 TYP _ _ 1 TYP 3 X15 —. _....—� -. 1faeH_ :ate ___tar _-'.:� ,1�: _-c>8.=a_._ - _ v _ j �.� a .'°� - 1� �1�1� "'��-.�•.. G POWELL PAINT TUALATIN VALLEY CLASS LIQUOR STORE it LAB 33 COMPUTER CENTER 12500 12490 12540 12460 SKILLS PLUS �' o O1 CONSTRUCT STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER. +� t UEN 0% SITIVI., CD \ CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB TYPE C. O3 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SIDEWALK. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^ H er Houf Peteisun Righellis Inc. O4 CONSTRUCT DE TRT SIWALK RAMP. �� F s _- o ,o � 59 O CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH AS S!IOWN OR DIRECTED. SAWCUT AND REMOVE EVSTIS77NG SURFACE AS G fiG i xg� /02 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ' p REQUIRED. w 11,863 p MAIN ST:JOHNSMOANI SST D ST(TIGARD) TREET Z' WASHINGTON COUNTY 19 CONSTRUCT 2' NIDE CONCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET X.X. CD WJ p O GOIY APPROBY: GAA CD 31 CONSTRUCT PEDISTRIAN GRATE. sFNr �q$ti ers .::D E4 .A7 24, DRAF-D BY. .0* o C4pY ALF e'0 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PIAN SHEET c� 1 EXPIRES 12/at/ti STA.7+94.66 TO STA.10+96.88 6 n: SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. SHERRIES JEWELRY BOX TIGARD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC `. TIGARD AREA CHAMBER 12425 12405 OF COMMERCE I \ . 12345 4- 71+00 ) 3/ 31 TYP 72+00 1 13 00 74-4 -- 4 19 TYP _ 2 ,`�.ice.}�:'�^�'._ •.� .'.. :——�— . .- -�_ ., °�.T'--��— _ - c-'`-._—` ..: .ai e-. a-.a--a'�•••_-- '.'.�.=_.�1 �.,� ,.`t EL Vlg ! MA1lI _— $TU�/0 j JAPLNESE. -—6 $F1R T 8 tJK OF TIGARD �--- MUSI'S ON'.MAIN CAFE ALLEGRO 12380 'TTGARD�LE STATION SA Ts,; L-421 a:p - - 12400• 12386 12370 — I 442 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Houf PetersLu on Righellis Inc. Lu o ��Q,ED PROFFss G �G 1 NE8 /� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 65 scum - M' 'L w 11,883 �' 9 MAIN ST;JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) ct� l MAIN STREET � �r WASHINGTON COUNTY CD OP G N i APPROWD BY: GAA c> �'p .�0�' DESIGNED BY: JDYY T 24,E -, DRAFGTED BY: OW o cQRY AIF�'O GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 'SET EXFM:5 1,-/31/11 STA.10-196.88 TO STA.14+00.00 a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. . - .. i ------------ _— F- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION wLEGEND ��QEp PflOFFs � _-— atpc�r�Iof Pete sui�Ri t hellis Inc. � 4�!- " f INLET 810—BAGS �5 G t N L �'/p PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS G 11,863�� MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST"TIGARD ST(TIGARD) MAIN STREET oax�oo SEDIMENT FENCE + ;�s WASIi KWON COU.-M CD CURB CUT 810—BAG .+PPROI'ED BY: GAA r 24,,9"i OEWNED". JD- o cq RY ALF�� ORAv1�0 BY: sew SI+TET 9 EROSION CONTROL PLAN � ~ EXPIRES 12/31/11 STA.0+00.00 TO STA.1+90.30 CA a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. 71GARD CYCLE 12551 WEI LI ACCUPUNCTURE A VES LABS PIPERS PLACE DOUBLE J CACHE 12575 = 12571 12549 12549 t J T 4+(1,0 3-1-00 r .j - ------- PRO DESIGN SOLUTIONS MAX'S BREW PUB 12568 f2566 12562 LEGEND INLET BIO—BAGS 30% $U M! Tk SEDIMENT t-ENICE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION er Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. CURB CUT 610—BA6 ....... .......... ...... PRP Lu 20 -- 1919 1 IV1,863 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Go 20' MAIN ST.JOHNSON ST-TIGARD Si QTS CD S9 MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY C? (D "tiGcold APMIED 6Y. GOA CD cy'.�SGNED BY: JDW 24,' Dr,�TEO BY: j0'm caRY A�_ C? EROSION CONTROL PLAN eT0 FFxplRrs;__i72/_3i7i_i STA.1+90.30 TO STA.4+92998 GA-1 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.t W. i HILLERS EMBLEM A TASTE OF HEAVEN AUTOMOTIVE DRIVETRAIN PERMA-TREAT TIGARD CLEANERS KEPLERS 12537 12535 12533 12525 12519 UPHOLSTERY —_ ---_— { _—_ '=� _ --; -_� __._-_ tI-i�_.— _ � - ----- •-- � `. 1251 i -51188—'." - - r 00 r ---- ---- -------------- -I°-_-- ® A-BOY - —' . POWELL PAINT CENTER --= 12550 - 12540 Cy3 v GV 3 % su'aIm fir" c0 c� E�GENS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION H INLET 810-BAGS / limper Houf Peterson Rigliel!;s Inc. Lu Lu I cr�oo� SEDIMENT FENCE PUBLIC I NES�'/o PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS za' 11,863 I 9 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARDST(IIGARD) 6 CURB CUT 810-BAG �_ r MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COM Y A QQ O ORCCON APPRDW-D Y GAS: f S"•. y�y' OESi,W:ED BY J.:W C J 24,E GC VRAFTED L''f. A'•� 9 QRY ASF S EROSION CONTROL PLAN "»o T a EXPIRES: Iz/3z%u STA.4+92.98 TO STA.7+94.66- GA-2 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. F"B–SHOP TYLER'S AUTOM071VE KISS CAR WASH 17.511 --12485 ` _.—_–_----- 12475 �+wv "`, _ --- .- _ . . . . --. - - _ � -1 __. _ :�.•_.,.�-fir . �-^-""''�•�_•��_ `: - —7- POWELL PAINT TUALATIN VALLEY GLASS LIQUOR STORE LAB 33 COMPUTER , CENTER 12.500 12490 f 12460 SY,lLLS PLUS 12540 12448 i 3 , a cn T .5 � '."� c0 // LEGEND OREGON DEPARTh9ENT OF TRANSPORTATION w /✓ INLET 610–RAGS f a Iia _ er Hou f Peo terson Righellis Inc. Lu ti 000000 SED1M£N T FENCE PUBLIC t N E �'/O PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS sc.F:r= zr �V sv�11,863�� 9 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) o-1D CURB CUT 610–BAG 2 f MAIN STREET 3"o WAsmNGTon counn O OtthGOp •PVP.D'+fD B:': GAN O C7 S V g0ti DE:AGMED r. .UM T 24,E C O� CRAE7E0 BY. ,qw CD A qRY SFS EROSION CONTROL PLAN NoT Exit=W: i<�r�/u STA.7+94.66 TO STA.10+96.88 GA-3 n. SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. o SHEPRIF'.S iFIVELRY_BOX TIGARD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC TIGARD ARFA CHAMRFR 12425 12405 OF COMMERCE 12345 :k% 11100'' I / 12+00 13 OrJ — ---- -- i I - ' - - -i--I - ----- --1 •11. _ _~`�'�,� _-----r-. t= x--= �' _, .moi' o � 7U ? JA NESE i r =� 1 - T , FIR B�PJK OF TIGARD MUSTS ON1�4fAIN CAFE ALLEGRO I i 12380 ILLS STATION SAL 4 — .4- - 12400 12386 12370 'I- - to LEGEND CD OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' INLET EID-BAGS ox o0o SEDIMENT FENCE Q,�0 PRo''c __<H Houf Peterson IIRighellis Inc.ui — 0 10 20 r-uM� ' p.'.w w,..avir•i co ' ' S G T NE S� PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS rb 1•. 20" Go CURB CUT BIO-BAG �\ `��11,863 E1 9 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) e l MAIN STREET .r MINWASHINGTON COUNTY VON A,P�O':f0 BY; ClA CD 24,�9$ry CCMG�:LD BY: .RDW C � (1� DRAFTED BY; JD'N 9 qRY ALS EROSION CONTROL PLAN O EXPIRES: 12/;1/11 STA.10+96.86 TO STA.14+00.00 GA-4 Q SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. MAY PE WCD SWAT TE:N FILTER FABRIC USE STITCHED V/UTILITY WORK Al-D 11 PHASING OF DEVELOPMENT MATERIAL X 011VE LOOPS OVER 2"x 2"POSTS ....... .... ROLLS FLOW i V� LO LID CN -7 L T 60" AREA DRAIN 6' MAX. SPACING (C) CATCH BASIN_ FRO�!T VIEW SIDE VIEW FLOW V,—LE FIL'7ER FABRIC A� ES LIBURY BOTTOM OF FILTER FENCE TO ASSURE SOIL FABRIC 6" VERTICALLY FLOW 3 IS TRA Pff BELOW FINISHED GRADE 2' FIR, PINE OR -1 m STEEL. FENCE Fi7grS, DITCH INLET INTERLOCKED 2 x TOP VIEW 3 POSTS TL7 RE INSTALLED 2" POSTS AND ON UPHILL SIDE OF SLIJPE f bags. ATTACH 4. COMPACT BOTH SIDES OF 1. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MUST BE FjrL TER FABRIC TRENCH.CONSIDERED DEPENDING ON SOIL TYPES. 2 BIO-FILTER BAGS SHSULD BE SILT FENCE UNSUPPORTED STAKED WHERE A!IPJCABLE USING <?) "SWOOP-11;TAKES OR APPROVE.COUAL PER PAG. I WHEN USING 30' 110-1115S TO FL FURTHEN INFORMATION PROTECT A CATCI: BALI'l YOU ML:T ON OE:-T-CRITERIA SEE CNAPIVP 4 OF CLEAN WAT(R HAVE 4 BAGS AND TI,Y SH.�;LL LE SEMCES EqOSI(AS PREVEN7tCN OVERLAPPED BY 6'. MG SEDIMENT CLWIRM PL NMG AND DESIGN MANUAL- 30% SUBMI-ML INLET PROTECTION TYPE 4 CIeanW�er Services T OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ORAVANC NO.915 REISED 12-06 Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. A I me PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS cl) 11,863 -P MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) U) CD r MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY I? toUKCGON ti APPP0115 BY: -A DESdGK':O,BY: JDW OFAFTEO,BY: JOW C? EROSION CONTROL DETAILS CD EXPERES 12/31/Li STA.0+00.00 TO STA.1+90.30 GA-5 SEC.2,T.2 S,R.1 W. STANDARD EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DRAWING NOTES: 1. APPLY TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS C�ADING PROGRESSES. (SCH A.5.b.ii.6.) 2. CONS7RU'TION ACTIVITIES MUST AVOID OR MINIMIZE EXCAVATION AND CREATION OF BARE GROUND FROM OCT06ER 1 THROUGH MAY 31 EACH YEAR. (SCH 3. DURING WET WEATHER PERIODS TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OF THE SITE MUST OCCUR AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY IF RAINFALL IS FORECAST IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS. (SCH A 7.o.ii.) 4. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS NOT IN THE DIRECT PATH OF V,)RK MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. (SCH A.7.c.ii.) 5. PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION AND RE-VEGETATE OPEN AREAS WHEN PRACTICABLE BEFC':?E AND AFTER GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION (SCHA.7.c.iii.1) 6. ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION OR OTHER PERMANENT COVERING OF EXPOSED SOIL IS ESTABLISHED. (SCH A.7.c.iii.3.) 7. SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT SIDES OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. (SCH A.7.d.i.(1)) 8. ALL ACTIVE CATCH BASINS MUST HAVE SED.'MENT CONTROLS INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. (SCH A.Z d.i.(2)) 9. WATER-TIGHT TRUCKS MUST BE USED TO TRANSPORT SATURATED SOILS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION nTE. AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT IS TO DRAIN THE SOIL ON-SITE AT A DESIGNATED LOCATION USING 1,,PROPRIA7E BMPs, SOIL MUST BE DRAINED SUFFICIENTLY FOR MINIMAL SPILLAGE. (SCH A.7.d.iii.3) 10. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OR COVERING OF SOIL STOCKPILES MUST OCCUR AT THE END OF EACH WORK, DAY OR OTHER BMPS MUST BE IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT TURBID DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS. (SCH A.7.e.ii.2.) 11. DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN ONSITE A WRITTEN SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROCEDURE. (SCH A.7.e.iii.3) 12. ANY USE OF TOXIC OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST INCLUDE PROPER STORAGE, APPLICATION, AND DISPOSAL. (SCH 13. THE PERMITTEE MUST PROPERLY PREVENT AND MANAGE HAZARDOUS WASTE, USED OILS, COr,TAMINATED SOILS, CONCRETE WASTE, SANITARY W,-TE, LIQUID WASTE, OR OTHER TOXIC SUBSTANCES DISCOVERED OR GENERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION. (SCH A.7.e.i.1 AND SCH A.7.e.iii.4) 14. SIGNG-ICANT AMOUNTS OF SEDIMENT WHICH LEAVE THE SITE MUST BE CLEANED UP WITHIN 24 HOURS AND PLACED BACK ON THE SITE AND STABIL;7ED OR PROPERLY DISPOSED. THE CAUSE OF THE SEDIMENT RELEASE MUST BE FOUND AND PREVENTED FROM CA!;SING A REOCCURRENCE OF THE DISCHARGED WITHIN THE SAME 24 HOURS. ANY IN-STREAM CLEAN !)P OF SEDIMENT SHALL BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE OREGON DIVISION OF STATE LANCS FEQUIRED TIME FRAME. (SCH A.7.fi.1) 15. SEDIMENT MUST NOT BE INTENTIONALLY WASHED INTO STORM SEWERS, DRAINAGE WAYS, O.,' WATERBODIES. DRY SWEEPING MUST BE USED TO CLEAN UP RELEASED SEDIMENTS. (SCH A.7.f.i.2) 16. THE APPLICATION RATE OF FER77LIZERS USED TO REESTABLISH VEGETATION MUST FOLLOW THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. NUTRIENT RELEASES FROM FEP77LIZERS TO SURFACE WATERS MUST BE MINIMIZED. TIME RELEASE FERTILIZERS SHG.LD BE USED AND CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN THE APPLICA17ON OF FERTILIZERS WITHIN ANY WATER WAY RIPARIAN ZONE. (SCH A.7.f.i.,).) 17. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN 1T HAS REACHED A HEIGHT OF i THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE ABOVE THE GROUND, AND BEFORE FENCE REMOVAL. (SCH A.7.f ii.1.) 18. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND BIO GAGS AND OTHER BARRIERS WHEN IT HAS REACHED A HEIGHT OF IWO (2) INCHES AND BEFORE BMP REMOVAL. (SCH A.7.fii.2.) �. ��° C? 19. CLEANING OF TRAPPED CATCH BASRIS MUST OCCUR WHEN THE SEDIMENT RETENT1014 CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY FIFTY (50) PERCENT, o AND AT COMPLETION OF PROJECT (f CH A.7.f.ii.3.) F20- REMOVAL OF TRAPPED SEDIMENT IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR SEDIMENT TRAP MUST OCCUR WHEN THE SEDIMENT RETENTION CAPACITY IIAS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 05 BEEN REDUCED BY FIFTY(50) PERCENT, AND AT COMPLETION OF PROJECT (S:H A.Zf.ii.3&4) _ Harper HoufPetersonRihg ellisInc._ 21. DEO MUST APPROVE OF ANY IREAln!EN'T SYSTEM AND OPERATIONAL PLAN THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO TREAT CONTAMINATED �p PROF Lu = CONSTRUC77ON DEWATERING OR SEDIMENT AND TURBIDITY IN STORMWATER RUNOFF. (SCH A.7.f.iii.) F`�b' 22. SHOULD ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CEASE FOR THIRTY(30) DAYS OR MORE, THE ENTIRE SITE M1/57 BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED Uco SING �5 ��1 N SCH A.B.o. EF O PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS VEGETATION OR A HEAVY MULCH LAYER, TEMPORARY SEEDING, OR OTHER METHOD. �c, k 11,863 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST[TIGARD) ( ) l MAIN STREET 23. SHOULD CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CEASE FOR FIFTEEN (15) DAYS OR MORE ON ANY SIGNIFICANT "'TION OF A CONSTRUCTION SITE, it WASHINGTON COUNn TEMPORARY STABILIZATION IS REQUIRED FOR THAT PORTION OF THE SITE WITH STRAW, COMPOST, OR OTHER TACRIFIED COVERING THAT WILL i�` ' V 40h�' MPRO'A.D BY: GnA 0 PREVENT SOIL OR HIND EROSION UNTIL WORK RESUMES ON THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. (SCH A.8.b.) FA 9gti DESIGNED BY: .IOW T 24.E �1 OP-TED BY: XO o GgRY ALFS� EROSION CONTROL DETAILS c� EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.0+00.00 TO STA.1+90.30 GA-6 tl SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. �. 2£3 23 S4 53 27 19 TYP '56 '�� 24,P ^ =o- 2-07 A 26 ' 26 ._ 1 q TYF 54 I--'�_'`~�� ✓ /!'' 23 J 19 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE CONCRETE CURS BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET X.X. 21 CONSTRUCT STORM SEVER MANHOLE. 23 CONSTRUCT STANDPIPE AND CONNECT TO STORMLINE FOR PLANTER CONVEYANCE. 3 24 PROTECT (P) OR REMOVE (R) EXISTING STORM PIPE AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. FILL ANY VOID PATH 3/4"-0 �/ ' "'TA' AGGREGATE COMPACTED IN 72" LIFTS MAX.CD � 26 PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE. ADJUST RIM AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. ir OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc 27 CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE OR MANHOLE. x �Q PROF �:s a;� °ate n..... 1 10v 2$ CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE PLANTER FOR STORM TREATMENT AND CONVEYANCE. SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS. PLANT PER �S��G t NEEs'f'�O2 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 171E LANDSCAPING PLANS. 4,V `� 11,863 I �y MAIN ST:JOHNSON Si-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) C7 _ 4 MAIN STREET S +�,� y-4WASHINMN COUNTY 0 29 PLUG INLET AND/OR OUTLET LOCATIONS AND ABANDON EXISTING STORM LINE IN-PLACE AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. A C1N.B(. r APFROYED BY: CAA F 53 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE. s`i'r �gery DESIGNED BY: JOW 24. f R'TED BY: JCW 54 INSTALL 10" STORM. CRY Ai-F ER U No- S STORMWATPLAN " 1 56 INSTALL 6' PERF. PIPE. I BRPIRES: rz/3i/n STA.0+00.00 TO STA.1+90.30 Gi d: SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. WEI LI ACCUPUNCTURErte. AVES LABS PIPERS PLACE `RGAR5_C.YCLE DOUBLE J CACHE 12575 E 12571 12549 12549 4 z.'-: TYP 71 r _441 I J 775 7 21 0- TYP 5,5 x ,I _65) 1 - I 1 14 P 28 3+00 28 19 TYP + I i 18 ,00 9 Fr 56 23 23 53 21 28 56 19 TYP 23 —.7 it- ----------- 7 T_. 7 4 oP i4 PRO DESIGN SOLUTIONS K!�A 23 -SATE-. MAX'S BREW PUB II 12568t2566 12562 18 EXISTING BRIDGE IMPACT PANEL. 19 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE CONCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET X.X. 21 CONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE. 0 10 .1 0�3 CONSTRUCT STANDPIPE AND CONNECT TO STCRMLINE FOR PLANTER CONVEYANCE. A024 PROTECT(P) OR REMOVE (R) EXISTING STORM PIPE AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. FILL ANY VOIO WTH .3/4"-0 AGGREGATE COMPACTED I Z� IN 12-LIFTS, MAX. 30% SUBA111TIA1, 207 CONNECT TO EXIS71NG PIPE OR MANHOLE. it OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE PLANTER FOR STORM TREATMENT AND CONVEYANCE. SEE TYPICAL SECTIr,.'.,5. PLANT PER THE LANDSCAPING PLANS. Harper HoufPolers-Ri�Bllis In Lu PLUG INLET AND/OR OUTLET LOCATIONS AND ABANDON EXIS77NG STORM LINE IN-PLACE AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. GINZ V, PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS S9 CONSTRUCT PEDISTRIAN GRATE. 11,863 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) @ MAIN STREET REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE WASHINGTON COUNTY C60CO aPMOVED BY G- 504 INSTALL 10"STORM. CED(WED BY xw 55 INSTALL 12"STORM. 24 OF.;XTED By. JDW = 9.EE A STORMINATER PLAN D6 INS TALL 6'PERF. PIPE RY EXPIRES. 1273i/11 STA.1+90.30 TO STA.4+92.98 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.i W. HILLERS EMBLEbf A TASTE OF HEAVEN AUTObfOTIVE DRIVETRAIN PERMA-TREAT TIGARD CLEANERS KEPLERS 12537 12535 12533 12525 12519 UPHOLSTERY 12511 --- 31 rYP 24 P 18 55 - 28 i 19 TYP --- ;1- 25 �' 28 21 27 �' i 57 it '58 55 19 TYP 55 A 55 24 P ^ ! Billi - (23) 56 u 25 f 2" P 27 53 A_BOY POWELL PAINT CENTER ® 12550 I. __ - 12540 18) EXISTING BRIDGE IMPACT PANEL. 19 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDF. CONCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET X.X. 21 CONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE. CONSTRUCT STAtXP:PE AND CONNECT TO STORMLINE FOR PLANTER CONVEYANCE. t4� PROTECT(P) OR P.EMOVE (R) EXIS17NG STORM PIPE AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED- FILL ANY VOID WITH 3/4"-0 AGGREGATE COMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS, MAX. 0 10 a 25 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND PIPING. FILL ANY VOID WITH 3/4"-0 AGG^EGATE COMPACTED IN 12"LIFTS, MAX. N 26 PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE. ADJUST RIM AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED- 30% SUBMITTAL CD 27 CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE OR MANHOLE. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION F- 28 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE PLANTER FOR STORM TREATMENT AND CONVEYANCE. SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS. PLANT PER THE LANDSCAPING PLANS. Harper Houf Peterson Righc1lis.Inc. Lu 31 CONSTRUCT PEDI SYRIAN CRATE. $�' EOF�c�, �/ .53REMOVE EXISMIG STRUCTURE. �GjSPUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 11,863 I MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) l MAIN STREET 54 INSTALL 10"STC:�� - j {� L1 WASHINGTON CWNIY o ,.. „ `. 0 55 INSTALL 12'ST-GV, - JFE:u v APPROVED=Y, GAA OESGNED BY. -0 F 56 INSTALL 6"PERF PIPE. n r 24 �� DRAFTED BY. sow* cb \`I) ABANDON EXISTING STORM LINE IN PLACE. qRY ALS EET � STORMWATERPLAN a 58 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND PLUG EXISTING OUTLET PIPE. EXPIRES: 12/31/u STA.4+92.98 TO STA.7+94.66 CJ-2 SEC 2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. SUB—SHOP TYLER'S CAR WASH ER's AUTOMOTIVE Z3 56 12511 ! 12485 12475 T 4,6 24 P — 26 y 55 1 z 56 `\ 56 \� I, v �8 28 19 TYP 28 "- - ' _ 10+OQ +-� 24 P 24 P 56 S5 j 2' 23 55 21 25 24 P 56 IJ t I: t TUALAr1N VALLEY GLASS ;�' 11QUOR STORE LAB 33 COMPUTER - 12500 J, 12460 SKILLS PLUS 19 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE CONCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAX ON SHEET X.X. 21 CONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE. 23 CONSTRUCT STANDPIPE AND CONNECT TO STORMLINE FOR PLANTER CONVEYANCE. v 24 PROTECT (P) OR REMOVE (R) EXISTING STORM PIPE AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. FILL ANY 1OID KITH J/4"-0 AGGREGATE COMPACTED IN 12" 8 LIFTS, MAX. s 25 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND PIPING. FILL ANY VOID WITH 3/4"-0 AC3REGATE COMPA:-TED IN 12" LIFTS, MAX. TOREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION r= 26 PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE. ADJUST RIM AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. H erHoufPetersonRighellisInc . 28 ��ED .;� .......e,.. .__s.,.._ CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE PLANTER FOR STORM TREAT14ENT AND CONVEYANCE. SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS. PLANT PER THE LANDSCAPING PLANS. PROFFg '"""'""'""""""""""`'-''" ""`•"` "' �5 G t N E ov, PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS �n 53 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE. cV� wr 11,883`A� q MAIN ST.JONNSONST•TIGARDSTQIGARD) C7 Q f MAIN STREET p54 INSTALL 10" STORM. p n + WASHINGTON COUNTY Q -S VREfO" M,ISD BY GAA C� 55 INSTALL 12" STORM. Fo Ory Gr'S :+ED J.. JDW j ny 1� "{YAFTEC *: JDW 0 56 INSTALL 6" PERF. PIPE. cgRY '0 .0. A STORI4 NATER PLAN �� CD 58 REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND PLUG EXISTING OUTLET PIPE. GJ-3 � EXPIRES: 12/31/ll STA.7+94.65 TO STA.10+96.88 SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.i W. SHERRIE'S JEWELRY BOX TIGARD CHIROPRAC71C CLINIC TIGARD AREA CHAMBER ;. 12425 12405 �� OF COMAr:'--RCE 12345 -21 2.3 _ 56 TYP` 1'i 54 _~ .// 'tet^ -_•_- — 55 -- - 2$ 73 Y28 56 =—–F-- I7�-00 55 1 12+p0 ' 13--00 i --I 56 19 TYP24 P 58 23 28 22 ! 21 54 23 28 = 7.{ ELVIA' ' MAIC1�s � _—� 35 5� �T 53 ?1 56 STu&O: JAPANESE (r FIRT,BA/VK OF TIGARD —i` MUSTS ON;'MA1N -� CAFE ALLEGRO 12380 OWLLE STATION �8 - SALM1 '�"�A 3,Q� �. _ * ," 12400 12386 12370 12.14-2 — ' ---- (0CONSTRUCT 2' N^DE CONCRETE CURB BREAK. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET X.X. 21 CONSTRUCT STORM. SF.WER MANHOLE. 22 CONSTRUCT CLEANOUT. 3 1 C� CONSTRUCT STANDPIPE AND CONNECT TO STORMLINE FOR PLANTER CONVEYANCE. 24 PROTECT (P) OR REMOVE (R) EXISTING STORM PIPE AS REQUIRED AND DIRECTED. FILL ANY VOID WITH 3/4__O AGGREGATE COMPACTED IN 72" o LIFTS, MAX. c� 2�- VA OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION F u:I•. 2$ CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE PLANTER FOR STORM TREATMENT AND CONVEYANCE. SEE TYPICAL SECDOTIS. PLANT PER THE LANDSCAPING PLANS- Harper Houf Peterson Ri hheeUis Inc_ w 31 CONSTRUCT PEDISTRIAN GRATE. xi N'0 SJ REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE-. ti 11863�'�s/� PUBLIC NSONSYITIGARDEME(TIGARD)) � MAINST:JOHNSDNST-TIGARD ST GARD MAIN STREET o(P INSTALL 10" STORM. r WASHuw:wN COUNTY OP.hGo:< APPPO'40 By. GAA 55 INSTALL 12" STORM. sF: eti Desar-ro er. IDW DRAFF:D Dv; •IDU 0 56. INSTALL 6" FERE PIPE. 1RY pLfS a+�cr STORMWATER PLAN 5$ REMOVE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND PLUG EXISTING OUTLET PIPL. sxe�aes tz/ai/u STA.10+g6.88TOSTA.14+06.00 CJ-4 a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. .r: Aaz 1? - , LEGEND F t~ 30% SUBMITTA- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Lu e; STREET TREE GZ S T a gazP�pouf Per�rson Righellis Inc.o^` .40 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS m 410 m MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(TIGARD) UllIJJ1LCIIIJ -3 0" MAIN STREET STGRfdWATEi2 PLANTINGS � � WASHINGTONCOUNCY �`p MICHAEL BRIOEN BENCH W OREGOPC! N APPROVED "�' Iffl198 DESK )F.Y: ,lpw TRASH RECEPTACLE � u' r.Eo s:: aw swcr - 9 pE AR PLANTING PLANHo. 0 PEDESTRIAN GRATE STA.0+00.00 TO STA.1490.30 GN L SEG 2,T.2 S.,R.t W. TIGARD CYCLE 12551 WEI LI ACCUPUNCTURE `, _ _ A VES LABS PIPERS PLACE �`' DOUBLE J CACHE 12575 12571 12549 12549 — — — r Q- 7. �..� �_yam 1 � • '.__-_ _• •�"-1�_ -. _ - •:�'.z�_..r_ __ 3+00 4100 PRO DESIGN SOLUTIONS KARATS MAX S BREW PUB _— 12568 (•2566 12562 10 LEGEND 0 STREET TREE0 310% i. I. (6 ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS Rm cD 77r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER PLANTINGS w BENCH r Lli S 1'Lr' —; a^Harper Houf Peterson Riph elks Inc.a o v —_ , = PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS n TRASH RECEPTACLE ® 410 0 in O MAIN ST.JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(TIGARD) ca MAIN STREET o i PEDESiF."Atl GRATE r+ WASHINGTON COUNTY MICHAELO'BRIEN O `T` APPROYEO al. CAA REGON "'Y DESIGNED BY: JDW nr.IAJs i J3 •l� DRAT-TED BY: JDW coET 044E AR� PLANTING PLAN 'NO, L- STA.1+90.30 TO STA.4+92.98 G d-1 a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. } HILLERS EMBLEM A TASTE OF HEAVEN AUTOMOTIVE DRIVETRAIN PERMA—TREAT TIGARD CLEANERS KEPLERS 12537 12535 12533 1 12525 12519 ! UPHOLSTERY on �. 1251, IL t I _ 7 1 / !• I _ �, l•® A—BOY POWELL PAINT CENTER 12550 12540 3 v z LEGEND 30% S U B IM I AL CD STREET TREE 77r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION iw ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS ��,S'�'�7j�� RP� , ,Harper Houf Peterson Ri ellis Inc___ 10 "1 ffm TS STORMWATER PLANTINGS m 410 ® PUB JOHNSLIC ON WAY � x UllJ�r�rirrri MAINST:JOHNSONST•TIGARDST(TIGARD) MAIN STREET BEN6H L..-, .. ,. � WASHINGTON COUNTY 1,71CHAEL O'BR1EN APP904ED BY: CAA c:l U TRASH RECEPTACLE r/ OREGON �� OESICNED BY: Xw 11/3119,3DP<=rEO AY: .xw o zr PEDESTRIAN GRATE 04pE ARS~ PLANTING PLANS2 �1 STA.4+92.98 TO STA.7+94.66 GN-2 a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. SUB—SHOP TYLER'S AUTOMOTIVE KISS CAR WASH 12511 i 1 - - -- ---- 12485 __—_- 12475 f i0+00 9+00 8+0& i ODE Tl f•�— '' r�s I1•, — I POWELL PAINT 77JALATIN VALLEY GLASS LIQUOR STORE LAB 33 COMPUTER CENTER 12500 12490 t! 12460 SKILLS PLUS 12540 12448 LEGEND 10% SUBMiTT," c� STREET TREE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION F- ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS ��+T Harper Houf Peterson Ttighellis Inc. t<1[11111[!1[1 ui a 10 20 'TO.RMWATER PLANTINGS u:~«:` �ROADWAY IMPR E„TS s E., m o 410 w PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS C/ ® BENCH MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(TIGARD) 3 i'�'_ i i�+e i `iA;'—K ( MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY to Qo TRASH RECEPTACLE r MICHAELO'BRIEN OREGON APPROVED B r,AA C7 DESCNED B:: JD'H PEDESTRIAN GRATE IrtlYvs �`� oxAVTEc sr: JD+ 044 AR PLANTING PLAN �Ne Y STA.7+94.66 TO STA.10+96.88 GN-3 a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. o SHERRlE'S JEWELRY BOX TIGARD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC TlGARD AREA CHAMBER 12425 12405 OF COMMERCE 1 12345 i ' `' i• 0 f 11-+00 12+00 13-00 — ---- -=-=r _ EL Vik� kAKI I } i TU JAPANESE FIR T-13,04K OF TIGARD —'- MUSTS ON'MAIN - CAFE- ALLEGRO i 12380 --VGARU LLE STATION SA _? Q�y ii , _•+, ]428—�— 12400 12386 12370 I ,r 12442 -13 END � STREET TREE c� q OREGON DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS _ Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. w o m ® STORMWAT£R PLANTINGSGI S T� L�,��,�I PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS wac ® BENCH ® 410 a MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(TIGARD), MAIN STREET Wk NINCTON COUKry o U TRASH RECEPTACLE E- '� MICHACL O'BFUEN ACPP.DY'ED BY: CAA CD I� PEDESTRIAN GRATE ,� ORE O � DEJ,NED BY: XM �� •l DRAFTED BY: JDV? -_ `SPE AR, PLANTING PLAN No STA.10+96.88 TO STA,14+00.00 GN-4 a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.I W. o49 ��.. �- _ •� j / 2x0 0 50 50 50 _II` 47 50 50 48 r - - •�,- .. _ms`s-�• �•. ..��`II '"' J..., •_tea ' '19MI AL co STRIPING NOTES cD y' OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED 4" WHITE STRIPE �. Harper Hou£Peterson Ri ellisInc._ 48 PROPOSED 4" DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE ED PROFFs All Lu ,.ore r.,..�......,. Lu 0 0 20 cn f -= 5� GINE S�PROF OSED CROSSWALK STRIPE PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ac . :r, zo O V �' � e 4' 11,863 � � MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(11GARD) MAIN STREET o rjQ PROPOSED ARROW i l �� Y WASHINGTON COUNTY NA R c> GREG N APPRDV70 BY:GAA 0 U` �c;:.T .4 �9�ry DES, ED BY. JDW i er O CgRY ALF SO� DRAFTED BY: ,A)H 9 STRIPING PLAN sNo. ~ EXNIRES: 12/31/n STA.0+00.00 TO STA.1+90.30 S a SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. —' TIGARD CYCLE 12551 WEf LI ACCUPUNCTURE ' '_ -� A VES LABS PIPERS PLACE r �`` DOUBLE J CACHE'% 12540 12549 12575 _ 12571 _ 49` 41$ 4 7 TYP 3+00 Y 4+''J 49 PRO DESIGN SOLUTIONS KATE-, TAX'S BREW PUB 'lr- li •! 12568 A,566 12562 STRIPING NOTES 300/10 :UBMiTT L CO 47 PROPOSED 4" WHITE STRIPE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION U) 4$ PROPO.3ED 4" DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE H earp r HougP terson Righellis Inc.o-_ _ 49 PROPOSED CROSSWALK STRIPE ��,ED PROFFss :. �.ADW IMPROVEMENTS r� i N g / PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS l I,863�� 9 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST•TIGARD ST(TIGARD) CD a =� MAIN STREET Scl E.�'a 20' W;.58iN�ifNi C0U7iT( Cb0 GO ' APPROVED 2Y: GAA (j �c^p 9�M1 DESIGNED Br. .N* �— T 24.N DRA"EO OY. .WN C? GARY A1-FSTRIPING PLAN NeT c� EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.1+90.30 TO STA.4+92.98 S-2 0- SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. I HILLERS EMBLEM A TASTE OF HEAVEN AUTOMOTIVE DRIVETRAIN PERMA—TREAT TIGARD CLEANERS ; KEPLERS 12537 12535 12533 12525 12519 UPHOLSTERY �. -_r_�.— _ --f— --, ! 12511 47 TYF' 48 47 TYP —5�@t} — I A—BOY POWELL PAINT CENTER 12550 12540 3 NSTRIPING NOTES 0 47 PROPOSED 4" WHITE STRIPE 30% SUBMITTAL 48 PROPOSED 4" DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION wy Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. W o is ED FIR ..,... ......... ........................<", t, �. �5 1G N EF��'�� PUBUC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (DQ 11,863 MAIN ST:JOHNSON NSTREET T-TIGAARDST(TIGARD) O ,, 7• WASHINGTON GDUNTY �. S 6R6GOii ti APPROVED BY: GAA Fp ,A� MSIG-ED BY..0W �p r 24,, 0.'(AFTED BY. JDW O 04 ALES STRIPING PLAN d EXPIRPa: l2/3l/lt STA.4+92.98 TO STA.7+94.66 S-2 SEC.2,T,2 S,R.1 W. IKISS CAR WASH ! SUB—SHOP TYLER'S AUTOM071VE r-— 12485 12475 �-3• - l. 12511 — --- -ill . I }•_ •.,.i_�—��-- _ � --_ `�'� I� • s 1 48 10+00 47 TYP 9+00 8+00 49 I 49 LIQUOR STORE LAB 33 COMPUTER POWELL PAINT f TUALATIN VALLEY GLASS !' CENTER ! 12500 12490 12460 SKILLS PLUS , 12448 12540 } STRIPING NOTES �I4 17 A M `. � � � c 47 PROPOSED 4" WHITE STRIPE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION F 48 PROPOSED 4" DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc. w 49 PROPOSED CROSSWALK STRIPE = a W m �5 GINE ", PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS w ll,ess c1 Ca E MAIN ST.JOHNSON ST-TIGARD S7(TIGARD) cn r• Z0' g ¢ l MAIN STREET io t WASHINGTON CWNtt 11 ORCI,ON APPROVED 3Y: CAA DE104ED DY: AW 0 <I, DRAFTED er: _r,. 04RY Al FSS STRIPING PLAN oc, 0 F S-3 EXPIRES: I2/31/11 STA.7+94.66 TO STA.10+96.88 b: SEC.2,T.2 S.,R.1 W. SHERRIE'S JEWELRY BOX TIGARD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC 17GARD AREA CHAA4BER 12425 12405 I , OF C01414ERCE 12345 % a t 47 48 11+00 12+00 11.-00 47 ILI 77� 77777� T ELVIA'.� MAKI _J I ,STUDIOJAPANES6 #fAiN CAFE ALLEGRO STATION ----99ARUWLLE STA � 'SAL ZIN BANK OF TIGARD ON� 12426-- 12400 12386 12370 STRIPING NOTES .407 Pliff'OFED 4" WHITE STRIPE u) 30% UBMITTAL c6 0 PROPOSED 4" DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Harper Houf Peterson Ri;hcllis Inc. 10 6-r=j G PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 11,363 MAIN ST:JOHNSON ST-TIGARD ST(TIGARD) C? MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY O APPROVED BY GAA DESIGNED By. JOIN DRAFTED BY: JOW 9 IYY AIJS STRIPING PLAN EXPIRES: 12/31/11 STA.10+96.88 TO STA.14+00.00 S-4 ILLUMINATION PLAN r � 1 C�riJIAY 99W I ✓I JW IACIM t J 1 PL , PL ' PL PL 1._ � PL PL g t _ � PL 1 ,x PL ,P PL 6 ® 6 SW AL4N 3Tf1EET PL pl pL \ PL PL - 'I PL 9 PIL 1 PL PL • / "014 e4 r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION PROF fsf --� Assmiales iap;wFAnAvenx.SdY'+b TegRox csgll=5Y>500 igatlgYqqTAilOq qq4...... PONan4,Megon 9t:G/SSgE Fad (54)I:evt431 LEGEND. �Nsa,o 4 ER 9 PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ® ROADWAY LIGHT POLE NUMBER(X). SEE l MAIN ST, JOHNSON $T -TIOARD ST (TI(iARD) 'STREET LIGHTING TABLE'.SHEET I-000X. / MAIN STREET OWASHINGTON COUNTY INSTAL.NEW PGF.PEOESTRIAN—SCALE STREET wngq ••:>+ PL LIGHT AND BLACK FLUTED ALUMINUM POLE WITH ti gEV DECORATIVE COVER ON NEW PRECAST 9 ry�� 'o aw4rrgaveY oqq cA. FOUNDATION. STREET LIGHT SHALL RE A '9 v "RY 15• POST—TOP ACORN STYLE LUMINAIRE,CONNECTED wo: TO 240 VOLT POWER SOURCE. WATTAGE,LIGHT . B�C DISTRIBUTION,STATION.OFFSET AND MOUNTING /- HEIGHT SHALL BEAS SHOWN ON"STREET $GALE mss= "FEET ILLUMINATION PLAN LIGHTING TABLE",SHEET I-000X. 0 20 i0�60 80 EXPIRES:DEC. 31,2011 _,AD Mq qq I-0001 X:\Projects\2010\P10082-000(Tigard Main Street Imps)\ACAD\IL-01.dwg ILLUMINATION PLAN PL PL PL p - f17 F 1 fi,oD y— W , �� ® SW A24BV STFIEET PIL iPL PL PL PL PL I I TA PL PIL j 4 i , PL PL q � t LE13END: ROADWAY LIGHT POLE NUMBER(X). SEE y "STREET LIGHTING TABLE',SHEET 1-000X. \ INSTALL NEW PGE PEDESTRIAN-SCALE STREET PL LIGHT AND BLACK FLUTED ALUMINUM POLE WITH \ DECORATIVE COVER ON NEW PRECAST FOUNDATION. STREET LIGHT SHALL BE A PL POST-TOP ACORN SME LUMINAIRE,CONNECTED PIL TO 240 VOLT POWER SOURCE. WATTAGE,LIGHT PL DISTRIBUTION,STATION,OFFSET AND MOUNTING _ HEIGHT SHALL BEAS SHOWN ON'STREET PL �� LIGHTING TABLE'.SHEET I-000X. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING POE r�- - i PEDESTRIAN-SCALE STREET LIGHT. 30% SUBMI 4L ' o w sTseer .�f f v OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION p9/� A TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION 1VOTa AMOCIGttF? 1/00,�YtTAmuO,Sw SW Te:gvOrv.lwryi:4}]]W PROFFfn TI1A"MOTAT10q:OLOTIONf PatlmEOsw021SSDt Fr. (50]IY411f]I GINE PUBLIC ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS' \ l MAIN STI JOHNSON ST -TIGARD ST (TIGARD) PL r ® MAIN STREET WASHINGTON COUNTY f PL t ' y r� N ti ........ ., L. , Q 9 BOO DRAWN BY: .D D. CAD"n t -� 'CRY l5• � SCALE FEET ® ILLUMINATION PLAN 0 ZO 40 60 $0 `O EXPIRES:DEC.31,2GI7 „i fa In I-000 X:1Projects120101P10082-000(Tigard Main Street Imps)1ACAD1 IL-02.dwg EXHIBIT F Agenda Item #6 Elem,tmts for Interim ]full/99W Catcway 1. Screening: fence and hedges to block neighboring views Considerations: Fence material Type of hedge screening B. Simple and attractive landscaping: Considerations: Maintenance Types of plantings: grass and native plants 3. Create site for future temporary art Considerations: Timing and selection (piggyback on Main Street art process?) 4. Flexible space Considerations: Doesn't preclude future design for more significant gateway monument, in conjunction with redevelopment of neighboring properties 5. Cost Considerations: Target under $10,000 Next Steps: ® Site transferred to City from County e New landscape plan ® CCDA approval e Build 7 Agenda Item #9 EXHIBIT G i 1 z i 3 i 4 i • TMC 2.64-City Center Development Agency (Section 2.64.060 establishes the CCAQ • CCDA Resolution No. 05-01 • Resolution No. 05-32 • Resolution No. 05-60 - • CCDA Resolution No. 06-01 • Resolution No. 06-64 • Resolution No. 07-28 • Resolution No. 07-09 ti x 9 3 .f i� i S i r S t Attachment 1 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON 3 ORDINANCE NO.01- 10 AN ORDINANCE CREATING A DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENT DIS1'R1C'f, ADOPTING AN ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC RAPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS AND SURCHARGES WHEREAS, The Tigard Central Business District Association requested that the City to create an economic improvement district in the downtown area(the"Downtown Economic Improvement District") and; WHEREAS,The City Council held public hearings on June 12,2001,and July 10,2001,on the issue of the formation of the Downtown Economic Improvement District and; WHEREAS,Written notice was provided to most property and business owners within the proposed district at least 30 days prior to the June 12 hearing and written notice was provided to all other property and business owners within the district at least 30 days before the July 10,2001,hearing and; WHEREAS, The City Council has considered the testimony offered at the public hearings concerning the formation of the Downtown Economic Improvement District and; WHEREAS,The City Council has reviewed the Economic Improvement Plan for the proposed Downtown Economic Improvement District and; WHEREAS, The City Council has determined that the proposed economic improvements would result in a.. special and peculiar benefit to non-residential properties and businesses within, the proposed Downtown Economic Improvcment District different in land and degree from that afforded to the general public, and 4 therefore,that the Downtown Economic Improvement District should be established. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS. SECTION 1: The Downtown Economic Improvement District is hereby formed in the territory shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated by this reference. SECTION 2. The Economic Improvement Plan for the Downtown Economic Improvement District attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated by this reference is hereby adopted, SECTION 3. Properties and businesses within the Downtown Economic Improvement District shall each bear a portion of the costs of the district. The annual amount proposed for assessment against non-residential properties within the district totals$26,667($27,104) per year,to-be spread as detailed in Section 5 of the Economic Improvement Plan. The amount proposed to be paid as business tax surcharges is $26,667($27,104)per year. i f ORDINANCE No.01- /0 Page 1 s f 1 The remainder of the estimated $90,000 annual cost is to be paid by the City and by revenues generated by the Downtown Economic Improvement District. SECTION 4. Notice of proposed assessments and business tax surcharges shall be mailed or personally delivered to the owner of each lot to be assessed or business to be charged. The notice shall state the amount of the assessment proposed on the property of the owner receiving the notice, or the surcharge to the owner of the business receiving the notice,or both. SECTION 5. A public hearing shall be scheduled at which affected property owners or business owners may appear to support or object to the proposed charge. The notice required by Section 4 shall state the time and place of the public hearing, which shall be held no sooner than 30 days after the mailing or personal delivery of the notices. SECTION b. The City Finance Director shall prepare the proposed assessment for each lot and file it with the City Recorder. SECTION 7. Assessments will not be made and the Downtown Economic Improvement District project will be terminated if written objections are received at or before the public hearing from owners of property upon which more than 33% of the total amount of assessments is levied or from more than 33%of persons conducting business within the economic improvement district who will be subject to the proposed business tax surcharge. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor,and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED. By M& vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this too day of ,2001. Q.Catherlrie Wheatley,Oity Recorcur APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this Zy — day of 2001. Pes"ELG' ffith, or Ap roved as to form: c Y Attorney Date ORDINANCE No.01--Q Page 2 •''••�, i 'CfTY:�i TI,G.Af2,D " z Y - .b r. MPM Mor �. x:'p� MINIM i JJr:! T' �7 ♦ I 1 Y•i s ♦�♦ ��►�� of ;::_ � . ♦4w . ■ r Exhibit 2 CITY Of TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 Fax 6847297 TO: Mayor Griffith, City Council Members FROM: James N.P. Hendryx, Director of Community Development DATE: June 12, 2001 SUBJECT: Economic Improvement Plan—Tigard Central Business District Association The City Council adopted Ordinance 01-01 on April 10, 2001 creating Chapter 13.12 of the Tigard Municipal Code which.establishes procedures for the creation of an Economic Improvement District. What is an Economic Improvement District? An Economic Improvement District is a type of assessment district in which property and/or business owners choose to be assessed a fee, collected by the City, for use in promoting and improving the business area. The concept of the Economic Improvement District is similar to a LID (Local Improvement District). However, rather than funding streets, sidewalks and other capital improvements as an LID does, an Economic Improvement District is meant to fund the many non-physical projects of a revitalization program. These might include: business retention and recruitment, planning, promotion/marketing, maintenance and management. In order to form an Economic Improvement District Council must adopt an Economic improvement Pian which includes: 1. A description of economic improvements proposed to be carried out, with any appropriate phasing plan or schedule; 2. The number of years, to a maximum of five, in which assessments are proposed to be levied; 3. A preliminary estimate of annual cost of the proposed economic improvements; 4. The proposed boundaries designated by map or perimeter description of an Economic Improvement District within which subject properties would be assessed to finance the cost of the economic improvement; 5. The proposed formula for assessing the cost of economic irnprovemen#s against subject properties. The formula may be an assessment based on the assessed value or area of the property involved, or a surcharge on the business tax on any business, trade, occupation or profession carried on or practiced in the Economic Improvement District, or both; Page 1 of 5 fi. A statement whether the property assessment will be a voluntary assessment or mandatory assessment; A_ If voluntary, that the scope and level of improvements could be reduced depending on the amount of money collected; B. If mandatory, that the assessment will be considered a tax under the Oregon Constitution, Article XI Section 11(b) and may be reduced to fit within the property tax limitation, thereby affecting the level and scope of services described. 7. If applicable, information about the organization requesting the creation of the Economic Improvement District; 8. Reasons why the Economic Improvement District should be created; 9. If applicable, a list of anticipated agreements between the proposed Economic Improvement District and other organizations; 10. The administration fee, if any, to be paid to the City for administering the Economic Improvement District. Following adoption of the enabling ordinance, two public hearings are required. The purpose of the first s public hearing is to announce the intention of the City Council to undertake the economic improvement project and to assess benefited property for a part or all of the cost for such improvements. Public notice must be sent to all property and business owners advising of the hearing and explaining the EID/BID. y This is the first forum where the whole community is able to provide public input on the EID/BID. The Oregon Downtown Development Association (ODDA) recommends avoiding efforts to change the proposal drastically at the first hearing since most owners already know what to expect and changing the 4 proposal may shake their confidence in the proposal, as well as assessment amounts. The first public l hearing is tentatively scheduled for July 10, 2001 (continued from June 12,2001). r The second public hearing must be held no sooner than 30 days after the initial hearing. The second hearing is tentatively scheduled for August 14, 2001, pending Council's action on July 10, 2001. At the second public hearing Council may approve the EID/BID, provided written remonstrances are not received from businesses and property owners who represent 33%, or more, of the total assessments to t be collected. PROPOSED ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN: 1. A description of economic improvements proposed to be carried out, with any appropriate phasing plan or schedule; The Tigard Central Business District Association states `the EID/BID will protect the investment that } we've made in our community. It will enable us to help shape the future of the downtown and complete beautification projects that will ensure a stronger business climate, better jobs, and a more f attractive community we can all be proud of." i I Proposed Program i . Two part-time positions—Downtown Manager and administrative support e Professional assistance from the Oregon Downtown Development Association e Flower baskets and street beautification Increased recognition of the business community o Training seminars for businesses a Promotions (Easter, Sidewalk.Sale, Halloween, Christmas, and Tigard Blast) a Clean and safe activities o Street amenities Page 2 of 5 3 { 2. The number of years, to a maximum of five, in which assessments are proposed to be levied; The E€D/BID would be assessed for five years. 3. A preliminary estimate of annual cost of the proposed economic improvements; 4 Salaries $41,000 e Equipment $ 500 4 Office $10,520 + Professional services $ 3,980 e Design & beautification $ 3,000 o Training $ 3,000 Promotions $18,500 Contingency LD 000 TOTAL $90,500 4. The proposed boundaries designated by map or perimeter description of an Economic Improvement District within which subject properties would be assessed to finance the cost of the economic improvement; Attachment 1 identifies the Tigard Central Business District Boundaries and the boundaries of the proposed EID/BID which are one in the same. 5. The proposed formula for assessing the cost of economic improvements against subject properties, which formula may be an assessment based on the assessed value or area of the property involved, or a surcharge on the business tax on any business, trade, occupation or profession carried on or practiced in the Economic Improvement District, or both; TCBDA is proposing a separate assessment for commercial property and business owners. Property assessment would be based upon the acreage of the property and whether they are on or off of Main Street and range from a low of $118 - $804 per year. Businesses would be assessed $132 - $170. The formula established a 25% differential for properties and businesses on and off Main Street, Main Street businesses and properties benefit to a higher degree than those off of Main Street and, therefore pay the higher rate. 6. A statement whether the property assessment will be a voluntary assessment or mandatory assessment; Assessments would be mandatory. 6.8. If mandatory, that the assessment will be considered a tax under the Oregon Constitution, Article XI Section 11(b) and may be reduced to fit within the property tax limitation, thereby affecting the level and scope of services described; I The consolidated tax rate for downtown Tigard is $6.4522, which is below the $10.00 limit. The proposed assessment for the Economic Improvement District when combined is the consolidate tax rate remains below the limitation. Page 3 of 5 i 7. if applicable, information about the organization requesting the creation of the Economic Improvement District; The Tigard Central Business District Association was farmed on October 14, 1998 for the purpose of promoting the economic health and development of the Central Business District of Tigard. Regular updates on the activities and efforts of the Association have been reported to the Council since their formation. 8. Reasons why the Economic Improvement District should be created; It is an opportune time for downtown revitalization in Tigard through partnership efforts of the Tigard ' Central Business District Association (TCBDA) and the City. The downtown is experiencing a recent, and notable reinvestment in commercial properties. Other opportunities are emerging as well. This i type of reinvestment shows belief in and commitment to the city's central core as a place to do business. The City has shown its commitment in the downtown by providing support to TCBDA. The Economic Improvement District creates a long-term partnership with business and commercial property owners for the continued strengthening of Tigard's downtown. 1 9. If applicable, a list of anticipated agreements between the proposed Economic i Improvement District and other organizations; Not applicable. 3 10. The administration fee, if any, to be paid to the City for administering the Economic Improvement District. Funding for the TCBDA would come from four areas. Commercial property owners would contribute $26,667, business owners would contribute $26,667, and promotions would generate $10,000. The City's contribution is estimated at $26.667. However, should the City want to recover the costs for coordinating the billing of assessments, an additional $874 would need to be charged annually. Total ' business and commercial property owner assessments would increase to $27,104 respectively. The cost is for hi#ling and receipting of assessments, and does not address any efforts to collect any delinquent accounts. Other considerations for creating an ElD/B#D • An FID may be an assessment on the value of the property or In may be a fee paid by property owners. The assessments cannot exceed 1% of the total assessed value of properties within the district. Total assessment value of the commercial properties within in the TCBDA equals $51,938,390. One percent of the assessed value equals $519,383.90. The total assessment proposed is $26,667. } • Only commercial properties may be assessed within the district. Prorating is required for mixed-use properties containing residential uses. Only commercial properties or portions of mixed-use properties containing residential uses and 3 businesses will be assessed under the proposed funding method. EID assessments may not include property in residential use. 3 Residential properties will not be assessed. Page 4 of 5 3 j� 9 :i is + The EID roust be established through City Council process. .� Two formal hearings are held by the City Council. •s Written objections called remonstrance from owners of 33% of the property upon which the total amount of assessment is levied stops the EID process. Two formal hearings will be held by Council to consider the formation of an EID/BID. The first will be held on July 10, 2001. The second is tentatively scheduled for August 14, 2001, at which time written remonstrances will be tallied in accordance to statute. Summary and Recommendation The Tigard, Central Business District Association was formed in 1998 in an effort to promote and revitalize the downtown. Stable funding is critical for their continued success. The proposed Economic Improvement District establishes a framework for the TCBDA to continue their efforts. Staff recommends that Council proceeds with formation of the district and schedules the second public hearing. islcdadminyerree\pmlgeneralleconomic improvement plan.doc Page 5 of 5 3 a 3 Attachment 1 a CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 01-_U___ AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE VACATION OF APPROXIMATELY 11,702 SQUARE FEET OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ON SW EEVELAND STREET, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD,WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON(VAC2001-00002). F WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code on July 10,2001,and WHEREAS,the approximate 11,702 square foot portion of the right-of-way had previously been dedicated to the public; and 1 WHEREAS, SW Beveland Street has been realigned to ensure better traffic flow at the SW Beveland/SW 72nd Avenue intersection.;and i s ti WHEREAS, the applicant has requestud that the City of Tigard vacate the approximate 11,702 square foot portion of public right-of-way;and WHEREAS,the said portion of public right-of-way may no longer be necessary;and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds it appropriate to vacate the requested public right-of- way; b WHEREAS,the City will no longer have maintenance responsibility of this area;and p4 P WHEREAS, all affected service providers, including utility companies and emergency service providers,have reviewed the vacation proposal and have provided no objections;and u k WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all owners in the affected area,as described by ORS 271.080; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Tigard Municipal Code 15.08.120, notice of the public hearing d was posted in the area to be vacated and published in the newspaper;and £ WHEREAS,the property owners of the majority of the area affected have not objected in writing; and WHEREAS, the City Council having considered the request at a public hearing on August 28, 2001, finds that it is in the public interest to approve the request to vacate said public right-of-way as the public interest will not be prejudiced by this vacation, as provided by ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130. i ORDINANCE No.01-I i:\citywide\ord\VACRFVFT.ANDORD-doc Page 1 of 2 i Z s NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Thu Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of an approximate 11,702 square foot portion of public right-of-way as more particularly described in Exhibit"A" and Exhibit"B" and by reference,made a part hereof. SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor,and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By UTAY1,rY\0US vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this aj!±_day of_ ,2001. I atherine Wheatley,City ecorder � APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this a8 day of 2001. J" G r Approved as to form: f't-'ti ---�--� Attorney Date z: a 2 E t ORDINANCE No.01- k k i!\citywide\ord\VACBEVELANDORD.doc Page 2 of 2 CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05- 01 A RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND REFERRING TIDE PROPOSED URBAN RENEWAL PLAN.AND REPORT TO THF PLANNING COMMISSION, DIRECTING DISTRIBUTION OF THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND REPORT TO TAXING DISTRICTS, AND DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE AGENCY MANAGER WHEREAS,the City Center Development Agency acts as the City's urban renewal agency; and WHEREAS, the City Center Advisory Commission was appointed to provide citizen involvement in preparation of an urban renewal plaza for Tigard's Downtown area; WHEREAS,the City Center Advisory Commission, after public hearings and considerable public input has, with the assistance of the City's consultants,prepared and approved a proposed Urbana Renewal Plan and Report, which is attached hereto as Exhibits A and B respectively; and WI-T-REAS,the City Center Development Agency has reviewed and considered the proposed Urban Renewal Plan and Report approved by the City Center Advisory Commission; and WHEREAS,state statutes require that, after an urban renewal agency prepares an urban renewal plan, that it be reviewed by the PJxmiug Commission,which will.mare a recommendation to City Council; and WHEREAS, state statutes also require that taxing districts which may be affected by urban renewal plans may review such plans and meet with the urban renewal agency that proposes the plan, NOw,TEEREFORE,BE IT RESOL'V'ED by the City Center Development Agency, that: SECTION 1: The City Center Development Agency proposes adoption of the Urban Renewal Plan, rased on the Report(Exhibits A and B). The proposed Urban Renewal Plan and Report are referred to the Planning Commission so that it may make its recommendation to the City Council. SECTION 2: Copies of the proposed Urban Renewal Plan and Report shall be provided to each taxing district that imposes a property tax on properties within the urban renewal area in the proposed urban renewal plan. SECTION 3: The City Center Development Agency delegates authority to the Agency Manager to act for the City Center Development Agency in fulfilling the meeting requirements of ORS 457.437. The Agency Manager inay nniher delegate tb.is authoiity. a F. CMA Resolution No. 05- 01 z Page 1 i SECTION 4: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This&bday of Ct6DL-0,1, 2005. r s Chair-Ci ?of Tigard City Center Development Agency ATTEST:. ! Recorder-City of Tigard City C&&r Development Agency lSetlmlpaWcetWS f019110.71-Qinrbrsmnnwnlp€anarrdreportauaoffinrd1-doa b i t a i k CCDA Resolution No.05-of i Page 2 Y S t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 3 RESOLUTION NO, 05- Iq A RESOLUTION ON THE INITIAL SELECTION PROCESS FOR CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION. { WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code (Chapter 2.64) establishes the City Center Development Agency, and WHEREAS, the City Center Development Agency, subject to the limitations imposed by the Tigard Municipal Code (2.64.050), shall act as the urban renewal agency and exercise all powers available to the agency under ORS Chapter 457; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code (Chapter 2.64.060) establishes the City Center Advisory Coininission comprised of seven to twelve members;and WHEREAS, the purpose of the City Center Advisory Commission is to assist in implementation of an Urban Renewal Plan, to make recommendations to the City Center Development Agency and to help x inform Tigard's citizens of theplan's content and activities; and R WHEREAS, the City Council met on April 19, 2005 and discussed the role and composition of the City Center Advisory Commission; and s. WHEREAS, the Downtown Task Force, made up of 24 members, appointed by Council, have developed, with community input, a draft plan for the future of Tigard's downtown.; and 3 WHEREAS, the Downtown Task Force, through community input and personal interest, have gained considerable knowledge of the downtown's needs; and WHEREAS,the Plaiuung Commission and the Parks and Recreation Board will be responsible for carrying out the vision of the Downtown Plan; and Y WHEREAS, hz the future, the composition of the City Center Advisor Commission could change to meet the needs of the City Center Development Agency, NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION l: The City Center Advisory Conunission shall initially include membership of 6 3. Downtown Task Force Members. SECTION 2: The City Center Advisory Commission: shall include membership of I Planning Coiun-aission Member. SECTION 3: The City Center Advisory Commission shall include membership of 1 Park and Recreation Board Member. t RESOLUTION NO.05 L Page I z SECTION 4: The City Center Advisory Commission shall. include membership of up to 4 City residents or property owners at large. SECTION 5: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of` = 2005. Mayor-,eitjof Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard S. RESOLUTION NO. 05 - Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05- 3-2 A RESOLUTION REACTIVATING THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AN URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY WHEREAS, after a Charter aizieindment terminating an earlier urban renewal agency of the City of Tigard, the Council adopted Ordiltaince 8905 (codified at TMC Chapter 2.64) in 1989, activating the City Center Development Agency as the City's urban renewal agency;and WHEREAS, wider Ordinance 89-05, the City Council exercised the powers of the urban renewal agency; and WHEREAS,the City Council, acting as the City Center Development Agency may designate another body to act as the Development Agency, and may do so at any time; and WHEREAS, the City Council is conlnnitted to placing an Urban Renewal plan inciudirig tax increment -finanncirig on the May, 2006 ballot, at which time the Council will also incorporate the question of governance of the Urban Renewal Agency;and 5 WIlEREAS, the City Center Development Agency's action.in 1989 and the early 1990s did not lead to the adoption of ail urban renewal plan; and a WI-IEREAS, the City Center Development Agency remained in existence after 1989 because the Agency a was never terminated,but has not beau actively pursuing development of urban renewal plaits; and 3 S WI1EREAS, the conditions justifying the activation of the City Center Development Agency are still present within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that it is time to consider development and adoption of an urban renewal pian to assist with development and redevelopment of Tigard's downtown and possibly other areas wittsin the City;and WB ERI;AS, the City Council chooses to have the City Council continue to act as the City's urban renewal agency, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City Center Development Agency is reactivated and shall actively pursue development of an urban renewal plan for one or inore areas within the City, as provided by ORS Chapter 457 and take other actions as authorized by ORS Chapter 457 and Ordinance.8905. SECTION 2: In pursuing the development of an urban renewal plan, the City Center Development Agency shall actively seek public input and shall consider the recoimnendations of the Crty Center Advisory CoitutussioII. RESOLUTION NO. 05 Page 1 SECTION 3: The City Center Development Agency shall take all actions with due regard for the rights given to the voters of the City by Charter Sections 47 and 48. SECTION 4: This resolution is effective inmediately upon passage. PASSED: This l day of ,-- 2005. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder- City of Tigard RESOLUTION No. 05 -32— Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05-6a A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT PUBLIC OUTREACH PLAN. WHEREAS, on .lune 2005, Council authorized the hiring of Norton%-Arnold & Company to help develop strategies to foster public understanding of the Urban Renewal Plan; and WHEREAS, the product of this work effort, The Urban Renewal Project Public Outreach Plan, has been completed; and WHEREAS, The Urban Renewal.Project Public Outreach Plan was developed under the guidance of the 3 City Center Advisory Comnxission; and WI1EREAS, the Plan was reviewed and discussed by the City Center Development Agency at its meeting on September 13,2005, NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: F SECTION 1. The City Council adopts The Urban Renewal Project Public Outreach Plan (Exhibit A) and directs City staff to use the strategies described in the Plan as a blueprint for the public outreach program to support the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. . SECTION 2. This resolution is effective innmediately upon passage. PASSED: This day o 2005. f Mayor- ity of Tigard ATTEST: -eil,,c rLA City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTIONNO. 05 - Page 1 a P i a City of Tigard Urban Renewal Project 3 Draft 1 jPublic OutreachPlea i z i 0100 a i Prepared by: Norton-Arnold & Company- 8/19/05 Reviewed by: Tigard City Center Advisory Commission - 8/24/05 Revised for Presentation to: Tigard City Council - 9/13/05 3 s i 7.. i i 9 S Tele of Contents jNTRODUCT1ON.........................................................................................................................................3 SCHEDULE AND COORDINATION........................................................................................................4 .HOW THE PUBLIC WILL INFLUENCE THE URBAN RENEWAL ELAN.......................................5 GOALS FOR PUBLIC OUTREACH.........................................................................................................6 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT URBAN RENEWAL?.......................................6 PUBLIC OUTREACH STRATEGIES..................... .......................................................7 S I S �t 1 v fi a ' r 2 3 k INTRODUCTION Autumn.2005 marks a significant time as the City of Tigard forges ahead with plans for a revitalized.downtown area. The Downtown Improvement Plan,culminating a comprehensive two-year public process, will be complete by the end of September. Likewise, a Draft Urban Renewal Plan,which will serve as the funding mechanism for many of the projects included in the Downtown Improvement Plan, will be complete and ready for public review at the end of September. And, a landscape architect firm will be hired to design the first of the "catalyst projects"outlined in the Downtown Improvement Plan. This "Comprehensive Streetscape, Commercial Streetscape, and Burnham Street" design project will serve as a concrete,highly visible example of how the Downtown Improvement Plan will be implemented over time. As the first tangible project to emerge from the Plan, it can serve to generate excitement and enthusiasm for the types of downtown revitalization efforts that will continue to,develop over the next twenty-five years. The combination of these PDn projects creates powerful momentum for a public outreach program, and the Public Outreach Plan outlined herein will be stronger and moreeffective by taming advantage of the synergy created by all three efforts.The Downtown Improvement Plan provides an Synergy and Urban Renewal overall context for the city's Momentum Plan-Provides future, and enjoys strong support the Funding from an active, committed reetscape Design leadership group. The -Provides th Comprehensive Streetscape Bible evidence project will provide opportunities downtown for the public to actively weigh talization in with their ideas on how the city's streetscapes and gateways can best be designed.And the Urban Renewal Plan will provide a road map for how long-term funding will be achieved for the catalyst and other projects delineated in the Downtown Improvement Plan. Working with all three projects,we will invite the public to learn more about the future of downtown,assist in their understanding of the upcoming Urban Renewal ballot measure, and engage their creative ideas for downtown streetscapes. By taking advantage of this project synergy,we will also make it easier and more efficient for more people to get involved in the fixture of downtown. Every public i meeting,presentation, discussion group, and set of printed materials will include t Tigard Urban Renewal Plan 3 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September I,2005 references to all three projects, creating a"one-stop shopping" experience for those who want to learn more. The details of how all three projects will work together for more effective public outreach are included in this plan. SCHEDULE AND COORDINATION , The Downtown Improvement Plan will be finalized on approximately September 3 0, 2005, and the Draft Urban Renewal Plan is scheduled for completion on September 27. The landscape architect for Streetscape Design is also scheduled to be under contract by September 27. The Downtown Improvement Plan is nearly complete, and identifies a series of revitalization projects that are envisioned over the next 20-30 years. A highlight the Downtown Improvement Plan is a series of catalyst projects, those identified actions that will jumpstart other development in the area and create a climate for investment. Although the planning process has come to an end,it will be important to continually remind the public of what,the Downtown Improvement Plan includes,the design principles it embodies, and the identified projects that serve as its core. The Urban Renewal Plan will describe how the catalyst projects will be funded, as well as the details of using tax increment financing to fund the proposed Urban Renewal District. The City Center Advisory Commission(CCAC)will complete its work on the draft Urban Renewal Plan by the end of September. After public review and comment the Urban Renewal Plan will be adopted by the Tigard City Council; this is anticipated to occur in December 2005. Because the use of tax increment financing requires a public vote of approval; it will be identified as a ballot measure in February 2006, and the public vote on tax increment financing will occur in May 2006. City of Tigard staff, elected officials, and the many community members actively involved in efforts to revitalize and renew the City's downtown core, will work hard between October 2005-February 2006 to make certain there is broad public awareness and understanding about tax increment financing and the Urban Renewal Plan:. Thus, the Public Outreach Plan identified here contains numerous opportunities to share information with the public. Once it has been identified as a ballot measure,however,tax increment financing becomes the work of an election campaign.At that point city staff and elected officials are not allowed to endorse the measure in any way, although they can continue,within limits,to provide factual information to the public. A separate campaign committee will assume the responsibility to build public awareness and support leading up to the May election. In recognition of this separate campaign effort to support the election,this Public Outreach Plan describes tools and strategies that will be implemented starting in early September 2005 and completed perhaps as early as mid-December,2005. Limited elements of the Outreach Plan may perhaps continue after mid-December provided such elements clearly provide neutral information only. Tigard Urban Renewal Plan 4 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September 1,2005 The Streetscape Design project will get underway in October 2005, and is expected to extend through August 2006. The architect team will be working closely with the Downtown Improvement Task Force and various advisory groups during the design process;opportunities for broader public involvement have also been specified in consultant scope of work.Pictures are well worth 1000 words and beyond. The drawings and illustrations created through this design process will serve as effective tools to build continued public enthusiasm for the revitalization of the downtown area. If this design process is widely opened to the public, and if people have the opportunity to see their "fingerprints"on the final design, there is a much higher likelihood that the design itself- - as well as the longer-term goals of the Downtown hnprovement Pian—will achieve broad, sustained,public support. HOW THE PUBLIC WILL INFLUENCE THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN The Urban Renewal Plan is being developed by the CCAC, with assistance from consultant Tashman Job son LLC. The CCAC,which is made up of community leaders with diverse perspectives, will ensure that the Urban Renewal Plan is written in.away that enables the effective use of tax incrementing financing to fund the catalyst projects. The CCAC began work in July 2005, and will issue the Draft Urban Renewal Plan in September 2005. After broad public review and comment, as well as review from the Tigard Planning Commission, the CCAC will revise the Urban Renewal Plan as necessary and reissue it in final form; this will occur in mid-November. The City Council will then review the Urban Renewal Plan, and will conduct a public hearing on the Plan before the Council votes to adopt the Plan in mid-December 2005. The Urban Renewal Plan will be centered around the catalyst projects that have been identified in the Downtown Improvement Plan. The Urban Renewal Plan specifies how the funds acquired through tax increment financing will be applied to these catalyst projects. As such,much of the Urban Renewal Plan has already been determined through the major components of the Downtown improvement Plan;the catalyst projects, for example,will not be changed at this time. Nonetheless,Tigard's citizens can influence the Urban Renewal Plan in other important ways. As they review the Draft Urban Renewal Plan,they will be encouraged to: ➢ Ask'questions to clarify key points; offering suggestions on how the Plan may be revised to be clearer to the reading public. ➢ Share their ideas on ways in which key elements of the Plan can be implemented in ways that are in the best interest for the city as a whole. 9 Discuss any concerns they may have about urban renewal and/or downtown revitalization. Comments on the Draft Urban Renewal Plan will be collected throughout the month of October and into November. The CCAC will meet in early November to determine if, and hour,the Plan should be revised. Based on their decisions,the Plan will be finalized and submitted to the City Council for adoption in December 2005, Tigard Urban Renewal PIan 5 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September 1,2005 GOALS FOR PUBLIC OUTREACH! This Public Outreach Plan has been designed to share as much information as possible about the Urban Renewal Plan, Downtown Improvement Plan, and upcoming"on the ground" design projects related to downtown Tigard. The goal of the Public Outreach Plan is to ensure that those who live and work in Tigard are as informed as possible about the revitalization efforts underway,the implications of their May 2006 vote on tax increment financing, and the ways in which they can continue to be involved in improvements to the downtown.area. HAT IS.MOST IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT URBAN RENEWAL? During the creation of the Downtown Improvement Plan, Tigard's citizens shared their ideas and visions for a revitalized downtown.A public opinion survey conducted in July 2005 also identified the components of urban renewal that are most important to the city's voters. The following"key messages"reflect the priorities that have previously been expressed by the public: 1) Urban renewal will give Tigard a new-"heart". As do most people in most communities,residents of Tigard have said they are looking for a"core"that clearly identifies their city. The catalyst projects identified in the urban renewal plan do that by identifying green space and town square projects, and by various additional, improvements that will help the city establish a unique identity. 2) Urban renewal makes economic sense for the whale city. The catalyst proj ects will spur economic development far beyond a few downtown. streets.'They will help Tigard become a nicer place to be overall,making it more enticing and safe to come to the downtown area for a meal or shopping. This means a stronger, more vital economic base that everyone will benefit by. 3) Tax increment financing is supported by the city's leadership. The fire chief, school superintendent, and leaders of other special districts understand the importance of tax increment financing. Although future financial resources may be shifted away from these important institutions,our leaders understand that the benefits from urban renewal far outweigh the relatively small budget reductions they may experience. A rising tide lifts all boats.An improved core economy will ensure that tax dollars are stable and healthy for the long-term. 4) Both the Downtown Improvement and Urban Renewal Plans are built on broad public input. The Downtown Iiroprovement Plan benefited by frequent, in-depth discussions and feedback fxom a broad diversity of citizen perspectives. The catalyst projects reflect the priorities identified through this public process. The recent survey indicates that Streetscape Improvements are a number one priority for city's voting public, and, in.fact, Streetscape Design is the fust funded project"out of the box"for downtown Tigard Urban Renewal Plan 6 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September 1,2005 revitalization. This strong commitment to extensive public involvement will continue throughout the implementation of the Downtown Improvement Plan. PUBLIC OUTREACH STRATEGIES 1) Creation of Support Materials To assist the individuals and groups ultimately assigned the responsibility for delivering on the other strategies and programs identified in this Public Outreach Plan, a number of supporting materials will be created,including: ➢ A brief Q-and-A fact sheet A A presentation outline and key speaking points. A PowerPoint presentation for use where appropriate ➢ Talk in a Box Kits (see strategy 43 for details) 2) Open.House/Public Meeting An open house/public meeting will be held in the first week of November to present, and take public comments on,the Draft Urban Renewal Plan.. information about the Downtown Improvement Plan and upcoming Streetscape Design Project will also be shared in graphic formats, e.g. illustrations from the Downtown Improvement Plan.,a list of the catalyst projects, etc. If possible,the landscape architect firmhired for the Streetscape project will be on hand to informally discuss ideas for how this project might be envisioned. The meeting will begin with a walk-around opportunity for attendees to review displays and ask questions of both CCAC members and Tigard staff. This will be followed by a "Town Hall"meeting that will include a presentation followed by a facilitated question/answerlcomment session with the assembled audience. The presentation will include a brief overview of the Downtown Improvement Plan, as well as a timeline that highlights public involvement opportunities related to the Streetscape Project. The bulk of the presentation will be focused on the Urban Renewal Plan,providing attendees with a summary of what the draft includes and what its implications are for the future of the downtown area. If possible, a representative from a neighboring city (Tualatin or Sherwood, for example) should also spend a few minutes presenting information on how Urban Renewal has worked in that jurisdiction. This might include an overview of what was funded, challenges experienced along the way, and the results of tax increment financing in that area.A representative from one of the organizations (such as the school district)that may experience a shift in resources due to tax increment financing should also be on hand to reassure attendees that this shift will not place an undue burden on other public services and programs. Although this meeting will be open to the general public and widely advertised, letters of invitation will alsa.be sent to an identified mailing list that includes,.for example,the Tigard Urban Renewal Plan 7 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September 1,2005 leadership of Tigard's business and service organizations, downtown property owners, downtown business and property owners,leaders of special service districts. These letters will highlight the importance of that individual's attendance at the meeting, and the need for them to participate as an active voice in the development of the Urban.Renewal Plan. Participants will be encouraged to stay for the entire meeting, but those with more limited time can come,review the displays, share their thoughts with the staff at the display areas,and/or leave written comments as is convenient for them to do so. All comments received at the meeting will be summarized in a brief report. The City and the CCAC will then determine how the Urbana Renewal Plan might be revised in response to the comments received. 3) Presentation and Discussion Sessions Numerous presentations and discussion sessions will be held to inform and share information about the Downtown Iinprovement and Urban Renewal Plans, as well as listen to any questions or concerns raised by participating individuals and groups:These sessions will be similar to those held in earlier phases of the Downtown Improvement Plan, and will range from relatively formal large group presentations to smaller, informal "Jiving room" meetings throughout Tigard's neighborhoods,to small-group discussion sessions with property and business-owners. These sessions will be held with as many interest groups as possible. Participating City staff, CCAC members and others presenting at and"hosting"these sessions will be provided with Talk in a,Box bits to help them carry out this task. The Talk in a Box will include a fact sheet,presentation outline and PowerPoint, and other information related to the Plan. If possible,brief videos that describe successful urban renewal efforts in other cities will also be included in the Box. Perhaps most importantly, the Box will also include a series of structured questions that will enable the presenter to elicit feedback from the assembled group. This will ensure that all presenters are asking similar questions,maintaining consistency in the types and levels of feedback received. ,... 4) Recruitment of Key Inftuentiats "Key influentials"are those community leaders whose opinions are likely to be most important to Tigard's citizens. In the case of urban renewal,the community's key } influentials are, of course,elected members of the City Council. In addition,.however, because tax increment financing calls for a shift in property tax revenues away from other institutions, it will be particularly important to have the support of those who are in leadership positions at, for example,the school district,the fire district,and any other organizations that may experience this shift in resources. The July 2005 public opinion poll indicates that when people do have concerns about tax increment financing,they are most concerned that it will take money away from schools or other vitally-important programs. These leaders need to visibly reassure the public that the shifts in resources will not in any way lessen the duality of the services and programs they currently provide. Key influentials will be recruited through one-on-one meetings with these Tigard Urban.Renewal Pian 8 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September 1,2005 individuals, asking them to appear at public meetings, assist with presentations,and generally lend their voice of endorsement to the urban renewal process. 5) Insertion in the High School Curriculum The Downtown Improvement and Urban Renewal Plans are vitally important to the future of Tigard, and, as such, are ideal topics for the high school curriculum.. One or two nigh school teachers willing to include the revitalization of the downtown area into the 2005-2006 curriculum will be recruited. These high school students may attend meetings of the CCAC or other review sessions to help craft the Urban Renewal Plan. They could assist with presentations and/or the public meeting, or staff one of the public display areas. The goal would be to gain their active participation, and to use these youthful voices to share information with both their peers and their families. Given that the vote will also occur within the school year,the entire process could be a valuable lesson in how public decisions are both informed and ultimately determined. 6) Creation and Placement of flews Tidbits Every two-three weeks, a new"piece of news"about downtown revitalization will be placed on the city's website, included in the Cityscape newsletter, or highlighted mi the Tigard Times. In addition, the City maintains a listserve of approximately thirty neighborhood organizations;this Community Connectors listserve will be an effective tool for sharing information.brews tidbits can also be placed in inserts that are mailed out with the City's water bills. The goal is to ensure frequent placement and visibility of easy-to-read short articles that highlight developments in the two Plans as well as the Streetscape Design project. In addition, at appropriate junctures meetings will be scheduled with the editorial boards of both the Tigard Times and the Oregonian.Metro West. 7) Establishment of a "Storefront" and other Public Displays The Tigard Sub Shop on Main Street will serve as a"storefront"for Urban Renewal. Drawings that illustrate key concepts of the Downtown Improvement Plan and Streetscape Design project will be installed as displays in,the shop's windows and regularly updated. Two Sub Shop tables will be available for public questions and discussion for two hours on three afternoon weekdays. Coffee or soft drinks will be available at no charge. Displays reflecting the Downtown.Improvement and Urban Renewal Plans will also be placed in the Library, in other downtown stores, and at other public venues as appropriate. These displays will be designed to share information and to encourage passers-by to access the city's website for additional information or to share their comments. Tigard Urban Renevml Plan 9 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September 1,2005 8) Inclusion in Major Public Events There are numerous-opportunities to share information about the Downtown Improvement and Urban Renewal Plans, as well as the Streetscape Design project Displays, fact sheets,and other information about these efforts will be available at: ➢ Citizens Academy, a ten-week session that provides training on city government ➢ Tigard Downtown Halloween Event ➢ Tigard Farmers Market ➢ Tigard High School football games ➢ The formal public meeting on the Streetscape Design project tentatively, scheduled for December 2005. 9) Outreach to Additional Property Owners and Businesses The preparations and review of the Draft Urban renewal Plan now underway with the CCAC has generated several proposal for expanding the boundary of the Urban Renewal District beyond the downtown limits contemplated in the Downtown Improvement Plan. These discussion have identified the rail corridor northwest of downtown up to Tiedeman Avenue,the other three"corners"of the Highway 99W and Hall intersection(the fourth is already in the Improvement Plan boundary),and about 65 acres of light industrial land southeast of downtown bounded by Hall,Hunziker,Wall and the railroad tracks. Should one of more of these areas be recommended for inclusion in the Urban,Renewal District,property owners,residents and businesses in these areas will need to introduced to the city's aspirations for downtown and the urban renewal concept. As the areas were not necessarily considered in the course of developing the Downtown Improvement Plan, these stakeholders were not directly brought into the outreach process associated with the Improvement Plan effort. Two neighborhood meeting are recommended—one for the Railroad/99W/Rall properties,and a second for the southeast industrial properties 1 a) City Council Public Tearing A final opportunity for public comment will occur at the public hearing held prior to City Council adoption of the Urban Renewal Plan. This hearing will be held in early December;the Council is likely to vote to adopt the Plan at its second December meeting. 1 1) Outreach Plan Evaluation and Transition It is also recommended that,the CCAC will hold a special meeting to evaluate the effectiveness of the Public Outreach Plan its December 2005 or January 2006. Questions such as: what has worked well,what hasn't worked,where are there key groups that still need-to be reached, should be asked. This will provide CCAC members with the opportunity to fine tune the Public Outreach Plan, and identify strategies that may continue into the campaign phase,with the understanding that roles will change once the ballot measure becomes final. Tigard Urban Renewal Plan 10 Council Review Draft Public Outreach Plan September 1,2005 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY i RE SOLUTION NO. 06-jDL S A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TIGARD DOWNTOWN a IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AS THE DOCUMENT TO GUIDE POLICIES AND ACTIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF THE DOWNTOWN WHEREAS,the City Center Development Agency acts as the Cit-/s urban renewal agency; and WHEREAS, the City Center Development Agency reviews and approves documents and actions in order to implement urban renewal projects in the Downtown; and WHEREAS,the City Center Development Agency, adopted the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan, which recommends a Strategic and Action Plan for Downtown; and WHEREAS,the City Center Development Agency, after considerable input from the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAQ, has reviewed and considered the proposed Tigard Downtown Implementation Strategy. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, by the Tigard City Center Development Agency that: Section 1: The City Center Development Agency adopts the Tigard Downtown Implementation Strategy(Exhibit A) as the document to guide policies and actions for redevelopment of the Downtown. Section 2: The City Center Development Agency shall, according to the Tigard 3 Downtown implementation Strategy, review and approve annual updates to the document in order to revise priorities, actions, and polices as appropriate. p } Section 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. s CCDA Resolution No. 06- + Page 1 PASSED: This .day of ,e �� 32006. Chair- btyof Tigard City Center Development Agency ATTEST- Recorder- City of Tigard City Ce er evelopment Agency 3 } d Y 's ffA a. }a� 1 5 r 3 }!7 3 ,5 Y a 1 s CCDA Resolution No. 06-�t Page 2 s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. Ob- D 2 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TIGARD DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE DESIGN PLAN WHEREAS, in September 2005, the City Council accepted by Resolution (#05-62) the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan (TDIP),which identifies as the first of eight catalyst projects a program to enhance the Downtown's streetscape; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2005, the Local Contract Review Board authorized the hiring of Otak, Inc. to help develop a Streetscape Design Plan for Downtown Tigard; } and } WHEREAS, the Streetscape Working Group served as the citizen advisory committee during plan development; and WHEREAS, the Plan was reviewed and discussed by the City Center Advisory Commission at its meeting on August 9,2006; and WHEREAS, the product of this work effort, the Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan, has been completed; and WHEREAS, the Plan was reviewed and discussed by the City Council at its meeting on September 19, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Center Development Agency reviews and approves documents } and actions in order to implement urban renewal projects in the Downtown. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Tigard City Center Development Agency that: SECTION 1: The City Center Development Agency adopts the Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan (Exhibit A) as the guiding document for improvements to Downtown streetscapes, gateways, public spaces, and green streets. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. t i zi CCDA Resolution No. 06-A2 1 IALRPLN\Council Materials\2006\9 26 06 ATTACH 1-CCDA RESOLUTION-TDSDP.doc PASSED: This -;�,4a"'—day of ��12006. Chair–hty of Tigard City Center Development Agency s a ATTEST: f Recorder–City of Tigard City eenter Development Agency i {Y jYY k 4 1 h { d )f ;i 4 i 54 { f { 4 d pd b e CCDA Resolution No. 06- 4 2 e IALRPIN\Council Materials\2006\9 26 06 ATTACH I-CCDA RESOLUTION-TDSDP.doc 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL. RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) BY LAWS WHEREAS, the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) has been operating without by laws since it was created in July 2005;and WHEREAS, with the passage of the Urban Renewal Ballot Measure in May of 2006, the role of the CCAC becomes more permanent; and WHEREAS, the responsibilities of the CCAC have changed from the development of the Urban Renewal Plan to the implementation of Urban Renewal projects, clarification of their specific 4 responsibilities will assist their mission; and WHEREAS, having a clear set of by laws will provide direction and structure for the CCAC on an on- going basis and when faced with the need for change. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council adopts the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) By Laws (Exhibit A) as the document to guide the roles,responsibilities and operations of the CCAC. a SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. t PASSED: This day of 2006. elf Mayor - City of Tigard AST: zg—z2b—hA��ru City Recorder- City of Tigaltd- RESOLUTION NO. 06- Page 1 }5 Exhibit A BY LAWS OF THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION i SECTION 1. CHARGE AND DUTIES (a) The City Center Advisory Commission (the "Commission's has the powers conferred by City Charter, the Tigard Municipal Code, the resolution approving these by laws, and such other powers as granted by the Tigard City Council, but shall have no other powers. These by laws are adopted by resolution of the Tigard City Council, are binding on the Commission, and may be amended only by the City Council. (b) It shall be the function of the Commission to act as an advisory body to the City Center Development Agency (CCDA), the Urban Renewal Agency for the City of Tigard, or the City Council as appropriate. (c) The Commission is charged with advising the CCDA on matters pertaining to Urban Renewal Plan implementation and tax increment fund allocations for the City Center Urban Renewal District. Recommendations pertaining to policy, budget, and implementation of urban renewal projects identified within the Urban Renewal Plan and / or the annually adopted Downtown Implementation Strategy and Work Program will be made to the CCDA or City Council as appropriate for consideration, deliberation and action. The Commission may also provide recommendations with regard to amendments to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. (d) :The Commission shall perform other duties as assigned by the CCDA. (e) The Commission may form subcommittees to investigate areas relevant to its charge or duties pursuant to this section. 3 SECTION 2. COMPOSITION (a) The Commission shall consist of nine (9) members appointed by the City Council who are residents of Tigard or own businesses or property within the City Center Urban Renewal District with the following representation if possible: (1) At least two (2) business owners or property owners whose business or property is located within the City Center Urban Renewal District; (2) Five (5) persons who are residents of Tigard and represent a cross- section of interests in the community at large; CCAC By-Laws Page 1 S V pk Exhibit A { ' (3) One (1) person residing within or adjacent to the boundaries of the City Center Urban Renewal District; (4) One (1) member of the Planning Commission (5) Two (2) alternates (non-voting) including one (1) at large resident of Tigard, and one (1) business or property owner from within the City A Center Urban Renewal District SECTION 3. APPOINTMENTS 1 (a) Council shall fill vacancies with individuals necessary to meet the compositional requirements of above. i (b) In addition, Council shall determine a means of staggering appointments of all current members initially using three (3) three-year terms, three (3) two-year terms, and three (3) one-year terms. (c) Appointments shall be made by the City Council with recommendations from the Mayor. SECTION 4. TERM OF OFFICE (a) After the initial staggering of terms for current members as defined in Section 3(b) above, the term of office of all future, appointed members shall be three (3) years or until their successors are qualified and appointed. (b) All terms shall begin January 1St and end December 31St (c) Any vacancy in the Commission shall be filled by appointment by the Council upon recommendation by the Mayor for the unexpired portion of the term. The unexpired portion of a term does not count towards the two consecutive terms limit in Section 4(d). { (d) Members may be reappointed for up to two consecutive three year terms. An initial one or two year term under Section 3(b) does not count towards the two consecutive terms limit. i (e) Members of the Commission shall receive no compensation for their services. g1 7 S S d S r.. CCAC By-Laws ' Page 2 Exhibit A SECTION 5. ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMISSION (a) At its first meeting of the year, and thereafter annually, the Commission shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair from its members who shall hold office at the r pleasure of the Commission. t (b) If the Chair or Vice Chair should resign, the Commission shall, at it next meeting, conduct an election and provide a replacement. (c) The Commission shall meet at least quarterly during a calendar year at a time and place that is specified at least 5 days in advance. (d) All meetings shall be conducted in conformance with Public Meeting Law. (e A record of the Commission's proceedings shall be filed with the city recorder. SECTION 6. VOTING (a) General procedures of the Commission,including voting, shall follow Robert's Rules of Order. E (b) A majority of votes shall determine the official position of the Commission on a given issue. i (c) Chair and Vice Chair shall vote on all matters before the Commission. SECTION 7. COMMISSION MEMBER RESPONSIBILI'T`IES X (a) Members of the Commission shall: 1 fi (1) regularly attend Commission meetings and contribute constructively to discussions, (2) consider and discuss issues from a Citywide perspective, as well as that 3 of particular stakeholders or interests, (3) understand and be able to articulate the Commission's charge, 3 responsibilities and adopted, annual work program, (4) strive to reach consensus on matters under consideration, (5) act with respect and consideration for the viewpoint of others, CCAC By-Laws l Page 3 Exhibit A (6) review and provide comment on reports, presentations, and recommended policies or strategies related to Downtown redevelopment before the Commission, and { (7) vote on motions in front of the Commission, except where reasonable abstention is necessary. (b) Commission members may engage in general discussions regarding its charge, responsibilities or projects within the Urban Renewal Plan or Downtown Implementation Strategy, but shall not discuss specific real estate projects or proposals with potential developers or property owners without the authorization of the CCDA. (c) In addition, members shall not make representations on behalf of the City of Tigard or CCDA without authorization. (d) Members shall not make representations on behalf of the Commission whether intentional or not,without the authorization of the Commission. SECTION S. ATTENDANCE If a member of the Commission is unable to attend a meeting, he or she is expected to notify the Chair or Vice Chair. If any member is absent from any six (6), regularly scheduled meetings within one year or three (3) consecutive meetings without reasonable cause, the issue shall be placed on the upcoming agenda, and upon majority vote of the Commission that position shall be declared vacant. The Commission shall forward its action to the Mayor and Council,who shall fill the vacant position. SECTION 9. QUORUM At any meeting of the Commission, a quorum shall be a majority of the current members of the Commission. No action shall be taken in the absence of a quorum except that the meeting may continue with discussion on agenda items. For the purposes of forming a quorum, members who have disqualified or excused themselves from participation in any matter shall be counted as present. l In the event a quorum will not be present at any meeting,the Chair or Vice Chair shall notify the Commission members in advance so that a decision may be made whether to meet and take no action on agenda items or to reschedule to a different time. Y 3 1 CCAC By-Laws Page 4 a t } Exhibit A SECTION 10. REMOVAL OF MEMBERS (a) The City Council may remove members of the Commission in accordance with Section 8 Attendance. (b) The Council may also remove members at its sole discretion. (c) The Commission may make a recommendation to Council for the removal of a member for failure to comply with Section 7 Commission Member Responsibilities. The Commission shall forward a recommendation for replacement to the Mayor and Council in a timely manner. a SECTION 11. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ' (a) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Commission shall prepare and file its Annual Report to the CCDA. t (b) The Annual Report shall include a summary of key activities and proceedings and any specific suggestions or recommendations which the Commission believes would assist its mission or the overall goals for the Downtown. (c) The Annual Report shall not be submitted unless approved by the Commission. 5 i 3 3 S Y x CCAC By-Laws Page 5 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A CITIZEN ADIVSORY COMMITTEE TO GUIDE THE PREPARATION OF A MASTER PLAN FOR FANNO CREEK PARK AND A DOWNTOWN PUBLIC PLAZA WHEREAS, the City of Tigard has approved the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan and City Center Urban Renewal Plan, which identify Fanno Creek Park between Hall Blvd. and Main Street, and a public plaza as key catalyst projects for Downtown; and WHEREAS, the use of Tax Increment Financing was approved by voters in May 2006, providing a long-term financing plan for projects within.the City Center Urban Renewal-District;and .. WHEREAS,Fanno Creek Park and a public plaza in Downtown will be used by the whole community and a Citizen Advisory Committee will help establish broad community support for the design of these public spaces;and WHEREAS, individuals representing a wide range of community interests are needed to form the committee and provide input into the preparation of the master plan; and WHEREAS, the committee members were selected through an established process lead by the Mayor. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Fanno Creek Park and Downtown Public Plaza Master Plan Steering Committee is hereby established to guide the preparation of a master plan. Its membership shall consist of those individuals listed on the attached Exhibit "A" 3 SECTION 2: The mission of the Committee is to: (1) Review and comment on draft master plan materials prepared by the project consultant;and (2) Guide the master plan to ensure that the proposed master plan meets community needs; and (3) Promote public understanding of the proposed master plan. RESOLUTION NO. 07 - Page I SECTION 3: The Fanno Creek Park and Downtown Public Plaza Master Plan Steering Committee shall: (1) Participate in at least four meetings conducted by the project consultant; and (2) Participate in up to three public open house meetings at the completion of project milestones to provide the public with an opportunity to review the progress of the project and offer comments: and (3) Consider comments received by the public; and (4) Present findings and recommendations to City Council and the City Center Development Agency (CCDA) at appropriate times. SECTION 4: The team of service for members of the conu-n ittee shall expire after the completion of the master plan and the presentation to the City Council and CCDA, and the committee itself shall be terminated at that time. 3 SECTION 5: The Senior Planner for Downtown is assigned as staff liaison to the Committee. Other City staff will be used to support the Committee's activities as deemed necessary throughout the process. SECTION 6: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. i PASSED: This day of ge �2007. orF i S j a i Mayor- ity of Tigard r ATTEST.- City TTEST:City Recorder- City of TigarcF x ti t RESOLUTION NO.07 - Page 2 Exhibit A Fanno Creek Park and Downtown Public Plaza Mauer Plan Steering Committee Carl Switzer, Chair (City Center Advisory Committee) Alice Ellis Gaut (City Center Advisory Committee) Mike Freudenthal (Parks Board) Trisha Swanson (Parks Board) Dan Dolan (Downtown Business / Property Owner) Chuck O'Leary (Downtown Business / Property Owner) j Eugene Butera (Neighborhoods) Lisa Olson (At-large) Brian Wegener (At-large) Mike Swanda (1st alternate) d Meg Schultz (2nalternate) 3 i S f 3, 3 t 3 2� P k� I e 'i i 3 y� 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07- 0 _ A RESOLUTION RE-ASSIGNING CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP TERMS i WHEREAS, Section 4 of the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) by-laws adopted by Council on October 24, 2006 requires that the terms of members be re-assigned to three 3-year terns, three 2- year terms, and three 1-year terms; and WHEREAS, Council has delegated the re-assignment of terms to the CCAC, and at its January 10, 2007 meeting, the CCAC approved new terms for its members; and WHEREAS, re-assignment of membership terms will help meet the new composition of the CCAC per Section 2 of the new by-laws. z NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that the following terms be re-designated as follows x SECTION 1: 3-year appointments: Commissioners Switzer, Lily, and vacant position; 2-year appointments: Commissioners Barkley, Potthoff, and Ellis Gaut; 1-year appointments: Commissioners Gallagher, Craghead, and vacant position. SECTION 2: In accordance with the Section 4 of CCAC Bylaws, all terms begin January 1 and end a December 31. E SECTION 3. This resolution becomes effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This 7 � day of2007. 1 } 3 i � f Mayor kity of Tigard Y ATTEST: i City Recorder- City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 07 - /0 Page 1 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 07-QS A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CCAC BY LAWS FOR MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION WHEREAS, City Council established goals for 2007 that includes "continue to support implementation of the Downtown Plan; and WHEREAS, in May 2006, Tigard voters approved Urban Renewal and Tax Increment Financing for use in the Downtown; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code calls for a City Center Advisory Commission composed of 7- 12 members, to advise and assist the City's Urban Renewal Agency; and WHEREAS, at its April 17,2007 Council Meeting, the Tigard City Council directed staff to modify the CCAC By Laws to replace the Planning Commission position with a a person with expertise in real estate development, urban planning or design, or affordable housing. F NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that SECTION 1: Section 2 (a) (4) of the CCAC By Laws shall.be amended to remove "One (1) member of the Planning Commission", and add "One (1) person with expertise in real estate development, urban planning or design, or affordable housing" 4 x SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of tj at2007. t Mayor City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder- City of Tig d RESOLUTION NO. 07- Page 1 i F 3 Exhibit A BY-LAWS OF THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (CCAC) SECTION 1. CHARGE AND DUTIES (a) The City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) hereafter referred to as the "Commission" shall have no powers except as conferred by this resolution, a City Charter, or the Tigard Municipal Code. (b) It shall be the function of the Commission to act as an advisory body to the j City Center Development Agency (CCDA), the Urban Renewal Agency for the City of Tigard or the City Council as appropriate. ` (c) The City Center Advisory Commission is charged with advising the City Center Development Agency, the Urban Renewal Agency for the City of r Tigard, on matters pertaining to Urban Renewal Plan implementation and tax increment fund allocations for the City Center Urban Renewal District. Recommendations pertaining to policy, budget, and implementation of urban renewal projects identified within the Urban Renewal Plan and / or the annually adopted Downtown Implementation Strategy and Work Program will be made to the City Center Development Agency or City Council as } appropriate for consideration, deliberation and action. The Commission may also provide recommendations with regard to amendments to the City Center j Urban Renewal Plan. (d) The Commission shall perform other duties as assigned by the City Center A Development Agency. Y (e) The Commission may form subcommittees to investigate areas relevant to its charge or duties pursuant to this section. } SECTION 2. COMPOSITION (a) The Commission shall consist of nine (9) members appointed by the City Council who are residents of Tigard or own businesses or property within the City Center Urban Renewal District with the following representation if possible: x (1) At least two (2) business owners or property owners whose business or property is located within the City Center Urban Renewal District; 3 € (2) Five (5) persons who are residents of Tigard and represent a cross- section of interests in the community at large; CCAC By-Laws Page 1 3 i Exhibit A. (3) One (1) person residing within or adjacent to the boundaries of the City Center Urban Renewal District; (4) One (1) person with expertise in real estate development,urban planning or design, or affordable housing (5) Two (2) alternates (non-voting) including one (1) at large resident of Tigard, and one (1) business or property owner from within the City Center Urban Renewal District SECTION 3. APPOINTMENTS (a) Council shall fill vacancies with individuals necessary to meet the compositional requirements of above. (b) In addition, Council shall determine a means of staggering appointments of all current members using three (3) three-year terms, three (3) two-year terms, and three (3) one-year terms. . j (c) Appointments shall be made by the City Council with recommendations from the Mayor. SECTION 4. TERM OF OFFICE (a) After the initial staggering of terms for current members as defined in Section (3)(b) above, the term of office of all future, appointed members shall be three g. (3) years or until their successors are qualified and appointed. (b) All terms shall begin January 1 and end December 31se (c) Any vacancy in the Commission shall be filled by appointment by the Council upon recommendation by the Mayor for the unexpired portion of the term. The unexpired portion of a term does not count towards the fulfillment of the three (3) year appointment. t (d) Members may be reappointed for up to two consecutive terms. (e) Members of the Commission shallreceive no compensation for their services. SECTION 5. ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMISSION T f S t s CCAC By-Laws Page 2 f i 8 Exhibit A (a) At its first meeting of the year, and thereafter annually, the Commission shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair from its members who shall hold office at the pleasure of the Commission. (b) If the Chair or Vice Chair should resign, the Commission shall, at it next meeting, conduct an election and provide a replacement. { (c) The Commission shall meet at least quarterly during a calendar year at a time and place that is specified at least 5 days in advance. i 1 3 (d) All meetings shall be conducted in conformance with Public Meeting Law. (e A record of the Commission's proceedings shall be filed with the city recorder. SECTION 6. VOTING (a) General procedures of the Commissions including voting shall follow Robert's Rules of Order. 1 (b) A majority of votes shall determine the official position of the Commission on a given issue. (c) Chair and Vice Chair shall vote on all matters before the Commission. SECTION 7. COMMISSION MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES (a) Members of the Commission shall: x (1) regularly attend CCAC meetings and contribute constructively to discussions, (2) consider and discuss issues from a Citywide perspective, as well as that i of particular stakeholders or interests, (3) understand and be able to articulate the CCAC's charge, responsibilities and adopted, annual work program, (4) strive to reach consensus on matters under consideration i (5) act with respect and consideration for the viewpoint of others, i t i CCAC By-Laws Page 3 Exhibit A (6) review and provide comment on reports, presentations, and recommended policies or strategies related to Downtown redevelopment before the Commission, and (7) vote on motions in front of the Commission, except where reasonable abstention is necessary. (b) Commission members may engage in general discussions regarding its charge, responsibilities or projects within the Urban Renewal Plan or Downtown Implementation Strategy, but shall not discuss specific real estate projects or proposals with potential developers or property owners without the authorization of the City Center Development Agency. (c) In addition, members shall not make representations on behalf of the City of Tigard or City Center Development Agency without authorization. (d) Members shall not make representations on behalf of the CCAC whether intentional or not, without the authorization of the Commission. , SECTION 8. ATTENDANCE If a member of the Commission is unable to attend a meeting, he or she is expected to notify the Chair or Vice Chair. If any member is absent from any six (6), regularly scheduled meetings within one year or three (3) consecutive meetings without reasonable cause, the issue shall be placed on the upcoming agenda, and upon majority vote of the Commission that position shall be declared vacant. The Commission shall forward its action to the Mayor and Council, who shall fill the vacant position. SECTION 9, QUORUM At any meeting of the Commission, a quorum shall be a majority of the current members of the Commission. No action shall be taken in the absence of a quorum except that the meeting may continue with discussion on agenda items. For the purposes of forming a quorum, members who have disqualified or excused themselves from participation in any matter shall be counted as present. In the event a quorum will not be present at any meeting, the Chair or Vice Chair shall notify the Commission members in advance so that a decision may be made whether to meet and take no action on agenda items or to reschedule to a different time. SECTION 10. REMOVAL OF MEMBERS (a) The City Council may remove members of the Commission in accordance with Section 8 Attendance. CCAC By-Laws Page 4 Exhibit A (b) The Council may also remove members, when, in its judgment, the conduct of a member does not conform to Section 7 Member Responsibilities or other a conduct unbecoming a representative of the City (c) The Commission may make a recommendation to Council for the removal of a member in accordance with Section 7 Member Responsibilities. The Commission shall forward a recommendation for replacement to the Mayor and Council in a timely manner. SECTION 11 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSION (a) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Commission shall prepare and file its Annual Report to the City Center Development Agency (CCDA). (b) The Annual Report shall include a summary of key activities and proceedings and any specific suggestions or recommendations which the Commission believes would assist its mission or the overall goals for the Downtown. x (c) The Annual Report shall not be submitted unless approved by the Commission. ,X S s 4 j� { 9. yi CCAC By-Laws Page 5 r i City of Tigard> Downtown Tigard> Going Green>About Downtown Tigard Page 1 of 3 l _ City of Tigard, Oregon � i+t2$.S SY'llaft Rf.•.d.f,R,>„S.fJft 9''X13 � 4rii•l:iy-y7.'1 �. r 'A Place to Call Home" x �oh"ti:7'rgt[rsd�H>rsu�xe"' Search city Hal( Business Community Police Library Help 9 Mar 2611 3 Quick Links 0 ! LHome ..vox+mx;w-u ..�naaxca»ie,•xivhz;�<.nm,• t,' About Construction Directions Maps History Contact _ x:w ikrM�, ua+: mvrcam,:,xv, ,?. «Affordable Housina ""8111 vi2 n,�i�"�ixy��t Bid Advertisements s- a Budget Docs a�ay.w..tiLtnk.t.:.+£ City Council a Construction In Tigard .,HOME :.Departments " Development Code :.Emero,ncv t T'� Mgmt/Resources about Downtoiva Tigard s,Events&Meetings :.Forms If Tigard is"A Place to Call Home,"then the downtown area is definitely the place to be.This quaint Town :.lob Opportunities Center is fast becoming a very comfortable"Living Room."In fact,with the upcoming "greening"of Main n New to Tigard? Street,it will become an even more desirable location. We encourage you to explore these pages to learn :.Parks in Tigard more about how this area has come about,and how it is evolving, We invite you to learn how to get around, 1! c.Passports involved,and plugged in to the very heart of.Tigard. ? :.Public Records :.Tigard Municipal Code Tigard's downtown area was identified as a Town Center in Metro's 2040 Growth Concept(the blueprint for :volunteer how the region will row in the next few decades A town center is an area that has a mix of housing, l Opportunities g� g }• 9r Water Division employment,and retail located where it is easy for pedestrians to walk around.Two nearby examples of i Zonina Town Centers are downtown Lake Oswego and downtown Forest Grove. Metro's website offers further details regarding Town Centers and has other examples. Online Services code compliance Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan-2005 .4 :. Library Cataloq-WReservations Planning for downtown Tigard's revitalization has been a long-term process with several previous attempts Park Reservations I ..Security Alarm Permit i over the past 30 years:The most recent effort dates back to 2002,with the announcement of plans for a :.Ticket Payments Washington County commuter rail line with a planned station in Downtown Tigard.This inspired a small v t.Tigard Mapping e ,,,, I group of citizens and business owners to work on ideas for Downtown to capitalize on commuter rail.A .i Services i state Transportation and Growth management(TGM)grant facilitated a more extensive planning process.A Utility Payments Task force of 24 citizens was formed to guide the plan's development.The planning process incorporated _ high levels of citizen involvement,including community dialogues,workshops,open houses,and a public j survey. I The Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan(TDIP)is the result of this planning process,and sets forth a 4 vision to create,"a vibrant and active urban village at the heartof the community that is pedestrian- oriented,accessible by many modes of transportation,recognizes and uses natural resources as an asset, and features a combination of uses that enable people to live,work,play,and shop in an environment that i is uniquely Tigard.The TDIP serves as a 24 to 30 year blueprint to guide Downtown development. i t City Center Urban Renewal Plan, 2005 An Urban Renewal Plan was developed to provide a funding stream to implement the TDIP.The Pian has a t duration of 20 years and a maximum Indebtedness of 922 million. Tax increment revenues generated in the urban renewal district will be used to support investments such as transportation and Infrastructure improvements.Urban renewal projects and programs Include the TDIP i catalyst projects and other public improvement and public facilities projects as well as technical assistance s programs such as a facade improvement program,rehabilitation/redevelopment grants,and Loan programs. The toots provided by urban renewal,including tax increment financing,are intended to attract private S investment and facilitate the area's mdevetopment.Tigard voters approved the use of tax increment 1. financing for urban Renewal in the May 2006 election. Downtown Plans There are many plans and programs which follow from the TDIP and City Center Urban Renewal Plan, including: Downtown Work Pian } FYID-11 Downtown Work Plan 5; http://www.tigard-or.gov/downtown_tigard/about/defauIt.asp 3/9/2011 ............ City of Tigard>Downtown Tigard> Going Green>About Downtown Tigard Page 3 of 3 i Appendix: Al:History/Development/Refinement (16.1 MB) • A2:Regional and Local Context (20.3 MB) A3:Political and Physical Framework (943 KS) A4:Site Documentation (2.6 MB) A5;Site Analysis (2.5 MB) e A6;Green Urban Network (2.7 MB) - Bibliography (129 K5) The Tigard Downtown Future Vision project was a collaboration between the City and the University of Oregon's Portland Urban Architecture Research Laboratory(PUARL).This projects aim was to graphically refine the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan(TDIP)and develap a clear understanding of Downtown Tigard's future development potential and urban form.The document consists of findings and recommendations,development scenarios of the downtown over the next 50 years,detailed sketches of the opportunity sites,and an appendix of research and analysis. Other Documents Metro 2040 Plan The 2040 Growth Concept is a long-range plan designed with the participation of thousands of Oregonians 2040 in the 19906,This innovative blueprint for the future,intended to guide growth and development for the next 50 years,is based on a set ofshared values that continue to resonate throughout the region:thriving RIT neighborhoods and communities,abundant economic opportunity,clean air and water,protecting streams and rivers,preserving farms and forestland,access to nature,and a sense of place. CONTACT US City of Tigard,13125 5W Hall Blvd,Tigard,OR 97223,503-639-4171 1SelectLanguage Map and Directions t Location and Hours of Operation Powered b - Translatey AFTER-HOURS CONTACT Public Works/Water:503-639-1554 1 Police Non-Emergency:503-629-0111 Questions,comments,suggestions?Fill out the feedback form. http://www.tigard-or.gov/downtown tigard/about/default.asp 3/9/2011 Exhibit A Revised 4/12/11 Criteria for Plaza Location from Fanno Creek Park and Plaza Master Plan: Connection to Fanno Creek Park (but not necessarily adjacent) Adjacent property redevelopment potential Plaza developable in 5-10 year timeframe Proximity to Main Street or existing/future commercial businesses Number of community edges (roadways) Visibility (location is clear) CCAC additional criteria (from 3/9/11 meeting) Parking Multi-modal transportation access Needs to accommodate concerts Additional potential criteria: Usable size of property Improvement to Land Value Ratio Real market value Distance from Main Street Site would allow some compatibility with previous plaza design plan DE IGN FRAMEWORK Design Framework Introduction for downtown was integral to the development of a 0 Ephemeral outdoor projects A key step in completing the Downtown Streetscape Design Framework. The project team and the SWG 0 Transit Improvements Plan—location, access and Object-oriented works Design Plan was establishing a Design Framework for approached the question of theme as three interrelated station improvements for bus and commuter rail 0 Performance art the public realm of downtown. The framework reflects parts. Each thematic part was considered as a basis of 0 Street Lighting Plan—lighting types and spacing 0 Text-based works the Preferred Design Alternative from the Tigard design. (full lighting analysis can be found in the Project Light and media works Downtown Improvement Plan(TDIP) and was Appendix memorandum titled Tigard Downtown 9 Demonstration or community gardens developed during work sessions with the Streetscape a Functional Design addresses safety, comfort and Streetscape Design Plan: Street Lighting Working Group (SWG). It provided a thematic basis access for users of the transportation system Recommendations by DKS Associates) Attempts to make public art uniform or singular in its for concept design to implement the TDIP vision. 0 Green Heart addresses trees and landscaping, 0 Street Tree Plan— spacing and canopy types theme are not encouraged.Art is a unique opportunity In any downtown revitalization effort vision cannot be connections to open spaces, and sustainability 0 Street Connectivity— future roadway connections to step outside the conventional design vocabularies of the only element. The Design Framework focuses on 0 Artistic Representation addresses streetscape streetscape and public space. Through its diversity and specific downtown improvement projects. furnishings expressing a style or historic period Street connectivity was part of an overall traffic creative expression of ideas and themes it can heighten analysis for street function improvements. The analysis the experience of downtown and the interconnected • Streetscape Enhancements A palette of unifying elements for streetscape and addressed existing and future traffic conditions, flow of people. • Downtown Gateways gateway design was developed. The primary alternative transportation modes, functional • Public Spaces characteristics are texture, color, and form, suggesting requirements for street and intersection design, and it a"family of materials" throughout the downtown area. recommended roadway connections. The full analysis _ _ •�� The combination of specific materials may vary from can be found in the Project Appendix memorandum Each project is an opportunity for action. Over time, place to place but there should be a visually titled Tigard Downtown Streetscape Design Plan: completed projects will represent a significant public recognizable consistency. Traffic Analysis for Street Function Improvements by investment in the downtown's public realm. Fully DKS Associates. realizing the potential of downtown Tigard will also An overarching theme discussed with the SWG was - require the City to become plan stewards by funding sustainability in the revitalization of downtown. Public Art Plan and creating project partnering opportunities for the Becoming a more sustainable society is another Public art can bring more vitality to the downtown urban renewal district, and by reexamining the City's unifying element for the specific themes and guiding experience by creating a set of interconnected places, zoning and development standards. principles of the TDIP, the Downtown Streetscape and emphasizing the flow of people, history, and Design Plan, and future economic development of nature. It can create a more memorable experience of i Design Themes and Unifying Elements Tigard. Specific sustainable principles can include: street corridors, gateways and public spaces, which are Discussion and refinement of a general design theme key aspects of the public realm. The Public Art Plan Recognize mature, healthy trees as a high identifies three distinct areas within downtown for A meeting of the Streetscape Working Group performing environmental tool in the design tool complementary but slightly different types of public kit art: • Make sustainable practices a visible educational tool 0 Civic Art Improve pedestrian access and circulation 0 Main Street Art - -- o; Recognize environmental and social 0 Green Heart Art - f _' sustainability provided by open spaces F . - 0 Emphasize green street stormwater management Implementing a public art program should include • Identify policy and development tools to assessing the potential for regional support andf integrate sustainable systems funding, setting aside urban renewal funding for art, formalizing public art as part of the City's mission, and /115 Functional Plans coordinating with local businesses. Implementing The Design Framework includes a series of functional actual artwork should emphasize a variety of artworks plans for the downtown area: and experiences. For example: _ Pedestrian and Bike Plan—primary routes and 0 Project inspired by local history The Mayor of Tigard Addresses a Public Open House recommended street crossing improvements 0 Ecological and nature-based art for the Downtown Streetscape Plan on May 25,2006 r PROJECTAREA Y. Downtown 1 4-1 City • I-2 0 � �J Design Framework THEMATIC ELEMENTS Theme as Functional Design Theme as Green Heart Theme as Artistic Representation Safety, Comfort and Access Open Space, Sustainability, Connections Style or Historic Period Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities: - Pedestrian Environment - Trees and Landscaping - Street Lighting -Walkability - Connections to Public Spaces F - Street Furnishings - Bike Travel - Connections to Fanno Creek - Sidewalk Paving -Access to Transit - Sustainability - Public Art - On-Street Parking -Public Art -Traffic Calming Implementation: Implementation: - Street Design Concepts Implementation: - Street Design - Gateways/Public Spaces - Street Design Concepts - Green Street Guidelines - Transit Functional Plan - Pedestrian/Bike Plan - Gateways/Public Spaces - Public Spaces/Gateways - Pedestrian/Bike Functional Plan -Transit Functional Plan - Connections to Public Spaces - Street Lighting Functional Plan -Unifying Materials Palette �r • yr � «� �• _ K j I• �x fft� 4-1 City 1 • I-3 Design Framework Guiding Principles Streetscape furnishings are finishing touches ' for"place making."They create a human - scale and help to identify different functional 77x ' areas of the streetscape. Complementary Classical Style furnishings based on guidelines from the - _ Unifying Elements will provide a thematic consistency that is a key implementing principle for the Downtown Streetscape Design Plan. Preferred as the dominant theme in streetscapes and gateways Information kiosks and signage are opportunities to incorporate furnishing characteristics into other visible elements of the streetscape. Signage may be developed with unique architectural forms and materials or grouped with information kiosks. Kiosks can use an architectural form suggestive of r, other conspicuous forms such as the - _ commuter rail station. Consideration should also be given to masonry pole bases for the t r _ conventional types of street and traffic signs. Contemporary- As an example, pole bases could be complementary to the columns and walls of Art Style nearby Gateway designs. Limited use as a counterpoint to classical style in streetscapes and gateways Naturalistic Style Y e , Applicable in Fanno Creek area, Commercial St. gateway Downtown and public areas • • I-4 4-1 City _J Design Framework TEkTU RE ,`.. Ke Themes Concrete pavers Sidewalks,gateways,public "TUnifying elements for downtown spaces streetscapes, gateways and public spaces are Stone Gateways,publics aces P ; ' �- --- intended to express the themes of an urban (especially Fanno Creek) _ ,r village and a"green heart."The emphasis on Compacted gravel Public spaces(especially Fanno SAWone theme over another may vary from street Creek)and Gateways 4_ [ to street, gateway to gateway and among the Decorative metals Bridge/overlook railings,barrier oT key public spaces. However, a unifying fencing,street furnishings palette of textures, colors and forms suggests a"family of places" and the visual interest Color: Color is a visually unifying element L 0 1—a n d F Q M found in diversity of design. linked to textural materials. Colors tie together spaces separated by distance and Texture: Texture can be a unifying m element fY g function. Black is recommended as a unifying ,,, through a simple and consistent palette of color for streetscape furnishings and VI materials for paving, walls, columns and decorative railings. Complimentary colors of 11 railings. The materials may be used in grays and reds/oranges can be found in the varying combinations as part of streetscape selection of sidewalk/gateway paving, P and gateway designs. gateway columns, walls and naturalistic stone work utilizing locally available basalt or Material Application similar material. Scored concrete Sidewalks,crosswalks,gateways Pervious concrete Sidewalks,gateways,public Plant Materials are an important color and T— ti spaces textural element as well, providing the unifying appearance of green (especially in the street tree canopy) and seasonal change through flowers, fall foliage and colorful {'xa winter stems and branches. Form: Form can provide both visual unity and interesting visual distinction. Form, along i 4 " with color and texture provides a sense of -- _ orientation for downtown and serves as r' ►` - -� _ visible landmarks. The preferred form for r ! downtown is the "classic" or"traditional" AQ � � style, particularly with regard to streetscape lab `� "� furnishings. However, more naturalistic forms may also be appropriate at gateways or . _ -"' within the public spaces, especially near Fanno Creek. - Public Art: Public is an opportunity to explore the use of key textures, 1 complementary textures not found in other streetscape or gateway elements, and provide enjoyable elements of surprise in form or interpretation of themes. 1 • I-5 • mooch.:! _J Design Framework UBLIC� ^ F;Z-lF RL^ N �:� �++ •� �r : Ow, �, � , ``t CIVIC ART X-P � fI,+ .>. ' I '�� `� . `- y - Large scale gateway artwork or water Xfeature visible from a car •� w V}°°..�q •ill- \� � , ..- ' Reinforce Hunziker intersection ,�� ,�, �,��`' �, � ,� � � I ? �'��✓� „��,: �- realignment �~; + lt. � �„,`,�`�IR• `;,' a - _ I - Reinforce civic themes like governance '•,}, `Y t�j! rt, e� ;; f � y..s- , _ a s MAIN STREET ART �41T•y t - � \ •� � 'r�k�4' � � � uj ' a� x ,rJ' q� x ee� Mark gateways at 99W with sculpture `�' ! ,s" ` � `�,' ;,� r; i•• or water feature to invite travelers on to Main Street Commuter rail station: clock tower or vertical artwork visible from 99W -��;,, � '� `�i'^" a"" ` r -Art Walk: smaller scale sculpture along Main Street - Enhance functional elements to enrich Y �y •, r pedestrian experience K�' d k x/ sr�►. �' GREEN HEART ART ►' n 1+ ''; �� '. ` ` ` -Art with natural materials and themes I to draw connection to Fanno Creek Environmental themes create and support education and stewardship ~'vAke JOv f � Green Corridor Art that creates habitat, engages all ages, v! Urban and can be interactive Creek 1 • ' {;` %> -Water feature can create a visual link to Fanno Creek A. '�►, .. , . -Art supports creation of public spaces for events J - Demonstration garden to model _ . , � �S► � green practices and enrich pedestrian AL experience •a r,. v 1 • 1-6 Design Framework P BLI ART PLAN . STREET . . CIVIC . . GREEN HEART . . OP- - A -. _ f •` TSS' L L 1 , f^ .. � .:I •c.-. low ems, y a !, �I 11\ ~' ~-T•- _ Yy 1, �f_aa � • r s 1 s lt r Examples of how - character , , could , among downtown. Exact art pieces will be developed through artist commissions and Downtown treetscape Pla + ' City of Design Framework , Q Streetscape Design Concepts (this project) Q� O C Future Street Improvements O ❑ -� Gateway Design Concepts / (this project) Future Gateways < err Fanno Creek Master Plan O �.� Green Corridor Urban Creek i Neighborhood Park </� ♦ o Multi Use Trail 1 1♦ r ♦® � � � 0 New Railroad Crossing O 1 O Z 1 4-1 City • I-8 0 � �J Exhibit F Ciryof Tigard Main tree ;L1en treet Parking Management Work Group Thursday Nights <�:i 6-7:30 p.m. Chamber of Commerce 2nd Floor meeting room 12345 SW Main Street Meeting Dates April 14, May 12, June 9 and July 14 In anticipation of improvements to Main Street, the City of Tigard invites downtown business and property owners to participate in a series of four meetings to craft a parking management plan for the Main Street area. Parking and Transportation Consultant Rick Williams, will be guiding these meetings. Goals of the Parking Management Work Group: • Keep business owners engaged in downtown ` y ` - • Develop convenient parking for customers • Reasonable and safe parking for employees • Parking with easy to understand signs and options ' -4= • Integrated system of on- and off-street parking that accommodates alternative travel modes • Ensure that parking in the district is for customers =z N, iil aPUeS � and other users of the district ,, Background The City of Tigard is in the process of initiating street level improvements along the downtown Main Street corridor.These improvements will include enhanced curb extensions and pedestrian improvements, new lighting, landscaping and storm water treatment systems. Overall, this package of improvements will result in a slight reduction in on-street parking stalls. Given the level of improvements anticipated, city staff and the citizen members of the Parking Management Work Group have recommended the development of a parking management plan for the Main Street corridor.The Tigard City Council has endorsed this recommendation. Implementation of the plan could occur in phases, with any parking issues managed before problems develop. Plan implementation could coincide with development of For more information contact streetscape improvements, and help guide long- a term decisions. Kim McMillan, P.E. � Construction Services Engineering Manager Bring your questions and suggestions! 503-718-2642 cell: 503-866-5784 kim@tigard-or.gov Log on and learn 11ore at: www.tigard-or.gov/mainstreet City of Tigard City Center Advisory Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 — 6:30-8:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Tigard Public Library- 2nd Floor Conference Room 13500 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. Welcome and Introductions ....................................................................................................6:30— 6:35 2. Review / Approve March Minutes .........................................................................................6:35— 6:40 3. Parks and Recreation Board Coordination.............................................................................6:40— 7:10 Discuss Downtown open space and Parks Bond funds (Chair Murphy,Vice-Chair Shearer, Commissioner Pao and PRAB representatives) 4. Downtown Public Art...............................................................................................................7:10 — 7:35 Discuss potential process to coordinate with Main Street Green Street project (Sean Farrelly) 5. Main Street Green Street Project Update...............................................................................7:35 — 7:50 Update on Open House and upcoming Parking Management Wlork Group meetings (Sean Farrelly) 6. Hall Blvd./Pacific Highway Gateway.....................................................................................7:50— 8:05 Review next steps for Hall/Pacific Hwy property (Sean Farrelly) 7. Downtown Marketing Strategy.................................................................................................8:05 — 8:15 Report from Michele Reeves presentation and upcoming schedule (Sean Farrelly, Commissioners Louw and Thornburg) 8. Commissioner Reports .............................................................................................................8:15— 8:25 Brief report on Facade Improvement Joint Committee, Metro Climate Leadership Summit (Vice-Chair Shearer, Commissioner Hughes, and Commissioner Pao) 9. Other Business...........................................................................................................................8:25— 8:30 10. Adjourn.......................................................................................................................................8:30 p.m. Upcoming meetings of note: 4/14, Parking Management Work Group meeting,Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main, 6:00-7:30 PM 4/18, Budget Committee Meeting,Public Works Auditorium, 8777 SW Burnham, 6:30 -8:30 PM CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA—April 13, 2011 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.dgard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 4/20,Downtown Marketing,Field Trip to North Mississippi Ave., 11:00 AM-1:30 PM (leave from Tigard City Hall) 4/21,The Knoll Grand Opening, 12291 SW Knoll, 11:30-1:30 PM 4/25,Budget Committee Meeting,Public Works Auditorium, 6:30 -8:30 PM 5/2,Budget Committee Meeting,Public Works Auditorium, 6:30 -8:30 PM (potential) 5/11, City Center Advisory Commission regular meeting,location TBD, 6:30-8:30 PM 5/12, Parking Management Work Group meeting, Chamber of Commerce, 12345 SW Main, 6:00-7:30 PM 5/25,Tigard HCT Land Use Design Workshop,Library Community Room, 6:00-8:30 PM (tentative) CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AGENDA-April 13, 2011 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 City of Tigard MainStrr:eeel" reen Strent Parking Management Work Group Thursday Nights <�:i 6-7:30 p.m. Chamber of Commerce 2nd Floor meeting room 12345 SW Main Street Meeting Dates April 14, May 12, June 9 and July 14 In anticipation of improvements to Main Street, the City of Tigard invites downtown business and property owners to participate in a series of four meetings to craft a parking management plan for the Main Street area. Parking and Transportation Consultant Rick Williams, will be guiding these meetings. Goals of the Parking Management Work Group: S • Keep business owners engaged in downtowny ` - • Develop convenient parking for customers • Reasonable and safe parking for employees • Parking with easy to understand signs and options 4.' — • Integrated system of on- and off-street parking that accommodates alternative travel modes • Ensure that parking in the district is for customers ==ME Ail aQUIS and other users of the district 11 IIIII,., Background The City of Tigard is in the process of initiating street level improvements along the downtown Main Street corridor.These improvements will include enhanced curb extensions and pedestrian improvements, new lighting, landscaping and storm water treatment systems. Overall, this package of improvements will result in a slight reduction in on-street parking stalls. Given the level of improvements anticipated, city staff and the citizen members of the Parking Management Work Group have recommended the development of a parking management plan for the Main Street corridor.The Tigard City Council has endorsed this recommendation. Implementation of the plan could occur in phases, with any parking issues managed before problems develop. Plan implementation could coincide with development of For more information contact streetscape improvements, and help guide long- a term decisions. Kim McMillan, P.E. � Construction Services Engineering Manager Bring your questions and suggestions! 503-718-2642 cell: 503-866-5784 kim@tigard-or.gov Log on and learn 11ore at: www.tigard-or.gov/mainstreet OWNER THE KNOLLATTIGAIRD The Knoll at Tigard Apartments, LP DEVELOPER Community Partners for �� _ Affordable Housing PROJECT MANAGER Housing Development Center ARCHITECT Carleton Hart Architecture x = GENERAL CONTRACTOR � � LMC Construction LEGAL Bateman Seidel —rte FINANCING PARTNERS Enterprise Chase Network for Oregon Affordable Please join us for a grand opening celebration! Housing April 21 , 201 1 ; 1 1 :30 a.m. - 1 :30 p.m. ADDITIONAL FUNDING PARTNERS Comments at 12 :00 noon Oregon Housing and Community Services U.S. Dept.of Housing & Urban Development Sustainable, transit-oriented senior housing, 48 units Washington County Office of Community Development 12291 SW Knoll Drive, Tigard, OR 97223 City of Tigard Community Housing Fund (off Pacific Highway at Hall and Hunziker) Housing Authority of Washington County Metro Light Lunch Catered by Da/ton's Northwest Catering Event sponsored by:Chase, Enterprise and Housing Development Center OWNER THE KNOLLATTIGAIRD The Knoll at Tigard Apartments, LP DEVELOPER Community Partners for �� _ Affordable Housing PROJECT MANAGER Housing Development Center ARCHITECT Carleton Hart Architecture x = GENERAL CONTRACTOR � � LMC Construction LEGAL Bateman Seidel —rte FINANCING PARTNERS Enterprise Chase Network for Oregon Affordable Please join us for a grand opening celebration! Housing April 21 , 201 1 ; 1 1 :30 a.m. - 1 :30 p.m. ADDITIONAL FUNDING PARTNERS Comments at 12 :00 noon Oregon Housing and Community Services U.S. Dept.of Housing & Urban Development Sustainable, transit-oriented senior housing, 48 units Washington County Office of Community Development 12291 SW Knoll Drive, Tigard, OR 97223 City of Tigard Community Housing Fund (off Pacific Highway at Hall and Hunziker) Housing Authority of Washington County Metro Light Lunch Catered by Da/ton's Northwest Catering Event sponsored by:Chase, Enterprise and Housing Development Center THE KNOLL AT TIGARD Grand Opening Celebration 11:30 a.m. Light Lunch and Self Led Tours 12:00 p.m. Welcome and Introductions — CPAH Board Chair,Judy Werner CPAH Vice Chair, and Tigard City Center Advisory Commission Chair, Tom Murphy Brief Comments - - Mayor Craig Dirksen, City of Tigard Council President Tom Hughes, Metro Commissioner Roy Rogers, Washington County Special Thanks: Peggy Linden, Val Valfre, Ramsay Weit Rick Crager, Oregon Housing & Community Services Dept., Interim Director Chuck Weinstock, Vice President,JP Morgan Chase Chris Walvoord, Underwriter, Enterprise Community Investment Bill Van Vliet, Executive Director, NOAH J ® Brian Carleton, Principal, Carleton Hart Architecture o Chris Duffin, President, LMC Inc. '9 Team Acknowledgements Sheila Fink, Executive Director, CPAH and, Daryn Murphy and Leslie Schwarz, Project Managers, HDC 1:00 P.M. Light Lunch and Self Led Tours Continue Site is on Tri-Met line #78, and just off Pacific Highway line #12 "-b Extra parking available at Tigard Public Works (Hall and Burnham) RSVP: dmccarter@cpahinc.org �� r