The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 04/22/2014 so TIGARD City of Tigard TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING April 22, 2014 COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED I:\Design&Communications\DonnalCity Council\ccpkt3 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov 111141 • City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD r TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Revised 4/17/2014: Agenda Item No. 10- Extension of Existing Prohibition on Medical Marijuana Facilities added and Agenda reordered MEETING DATE AND TIME: April 22, 2014 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated;it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in arty order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IUD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171,ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (I DD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://live.tigard-or.gov CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. ■ • City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD Revised 4/17/2014:Agenda Item No.10-Extension of Existing Prohibition on Medical Marijuana Facilities added and Agenda reordered MEETING DATE AND TIME: April 22,2014 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 PM •EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transactions under ORS 192.660(2) (e).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. •STUDY SESSION A. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD DISCUSSION ON UPCOMING CONTRACTS B. DISCUSSION ON CHANGES TO ALARM SYS 1'EMS ORDINANCE -TMC 11.08 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Council Communications &Liaison Reports E. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please) A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: Tigard City Council These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion.Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 7:40 pm estimated time A. Approve City Council Minutes for: •February 18,2014 •March 18,2014 B. AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH METRO REGARDING A CET GRANT FOR THE RIVER TERRACE COMMUNITY PLAN C. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WESTSIDE TRAIL MASTER PLAN AND ADDING THAT PLAN TO THE TIGARD GREENWAYS TRAIL SYSTEM MASTER PLAN •Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council! Center Development Agony has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. ARBOR MONTH UPDATE AND TREE CITY USA AWARD 7:45 pm estimated time 5. PROCLAIM MAY 5-11,2014,BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK 7:55 pm estimated time 6. PROCLAIM MAY AS BIKE MONTH 8:00 pm estimated time 7. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING -FY 2014 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENT 8:05 pm estimated time 8. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FY 2014 CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTED BUDGET 8:25 pm estimated time 9. CONSIDER A REVISED RESOLUTION GRANTING EXEMPTION FROM PROPERTY TAXES UNDER TMC 3.50 FOR FIVE NON-PROFIT LOW INCOME HOUSING PROJECTS 8:30 pm estimated time 10. EXTENSION OF EXISTING PROHIBITION ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA FACILITIES 8:35 pm estimated time 11. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY GIVING THE COUNTY THE AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR THE WALNUT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 8:45 pm estimated time 12. NON AGENDA ITEMS 13. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 8:55 pm estimated time 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 15. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 pm estimated time AIS-1697 A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Discussion on Upcoming Contracts Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett,Financial and Information Services Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Discussion on upcoming 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street Intersection Improvements construction contract that will be going before Local Contract Review Board in May. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff is asking the Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) to provide direction and additional information they would like to have presented during the contract award for the 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street Intersections Improvements construction contract slated for the May 13,2014 agenda. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street Intersection Improvements The Work to be done under this contract consists of the following on SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street Section in Washington County: •Construction of retaining walls. •Construction of stormwater and water quality facilities. •Performance of earthwork. •Construction of curbs, sidewalks,reinforced concrete paving,and HMAC paving. •Installation of striping and legends. •Installation of permanent signing. •Installation of illumination system. •Installation of landscaping and irrigation systems. •Underground utilities work. •Performance of additional and incidental Work as called for by the Specifications and Plans. The City issued an Invitation to Bid for the work on April 2,2014 with a closing date of April 16th. Staff will have the results of the Invitation to Bid available for the Council at their April 22nd meeting.The city's engineer's estimate for this work is $1.6 million. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION This will be the first time before the Local Contract Review Board for this contract. Attachments No file(s)attached. 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street Intersection Improvements Bid Opening April 16,2014 5T l("--, � �/�� ` L � 71--e/21 y/ `2/ 0/ Li Bid Tabulations - ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Kerr Contractors Pacific Excavation Phaze Concrete Goodfellows Bros Canby Excavating 3 Kings Environmental BID ITEM# ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT AMOUNT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL TEMPORARY FEATURES AND APPURTENANCES 1 MOBILIZATION I All $ 97,827.00 S 97,827.00 $ 103,300.00 $ 103,300.00 S 135,000.00 S 135,000.00 $ 48,643.00 S 48,643.0)1 S 127000 uu S 127,000.(X) S 150,010.00 $ 150,0011 00 $ 130,000.00 S 130,000.00 2 TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND DIRECTION OF TRAFF1C LS All S 34,328.00 $ 34,328.00 $ 8,82000 $ 8,820.00 S 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 5 17,876.00 5 17,876.00 5 25,000.00 S 25,000.00 5 27,000.00 S 27,000.00 5 11,812.00 5 11,812.00 3 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS EACH 4 $ 4,200.00 5 16,800.00 5 4,600.00 S 18,400.00 5 6,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 12,843.00 5 51,372.00 5 6,300.00 $ 25,200.00 5 6,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 7,063.00 5 28,252.00 4 FWGGERS HOUR 1,420 $ 47.00 $ 66,740.00 $ 46.78 S 66,427.60 5 30.00 $ 42,600.00 $ 66.00 5 93,720.00 5 48.00 $ 68,160.00 $ 44.00 S 62,480.00 S 50.00 $ 71,000.00+ 5 EROSION CONTROL LS All $ 7,525.00 $ 7,525.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,785.00 $ 5,785.00 $ 22,500.00 $ 22,500.00 $ 5,000.00 5 5,000.00_$ 16,113.00 $ 16,11100 6 CHECK DAM EACH 1 S 200.00 5 200.00,; 150.00 5 150.00 $ 150.00 5 150.00 $ 371.00 $ 371.00 5 390.00-S 390.00 5 250.00 S 250.00 5 500.00 5 500.00 7 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 2 5 1,300.00 5 2,600.00 $ 1,750.00 5 3,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,082.00 S 6,164.00 $ 2,000.00 S 4,000.00 5 1,500.00 S 3,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 8 SEDIMENT FENCE.,UNSUPPORTED FOOT 1,090 S 2.50 5 2,725.00 $ 5.00 S 5,450.00 § 2.00 $ 2,180.00 $ 2.00 $ 2,180.00 S 3.00 S 3,270.00 5 5.00 S 5,450.00 $ 2.00 5 2180.00 9 INL.ETPROTF:CIION EACH 14 $ 75.00 5 1,050.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 50.00 5 700.00 $ 81.00 $ 1,134.00 $ 83.00 5 1,162.00 5 150.00 S 2,100.00 S 40.00 $ 560.00 10 SEDIMENT BARRIER FOOT 15 S 15.00 $ 225.00 $ 15.00 5 225.00 5 10.00 § 150.00 $ 11.00 $ 165.00 $ 25.00 5 375.00 § 9.00 S 135.00 5 22.00 $ 330.00 11 POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN LS All $ 650.00 5 650.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 S 500.00 $ 500.00 5 579.00 $ 579.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,00100 S 2,000.00 $ _ 500.00 8 500.00 12 TEMPORARY 5 FOOT ORANGE PROIEC I VI:FENCE FOOT 132 $ 4.50 $ 594.00 $ 3.00 $ 396.0 5 5.00 $ 660.00 $ 2.00 $ 264.00 $ 3.00 5 396.00 S 6.00 S 792.00 $ 2.00 $ 264.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 231,264.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 213,918.60 SECTION TOTAL= S 252,940.00 SECTION TOTAL= 8 228,253.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 278,453.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 282,207.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 264,511.00 ROADWORK 13 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY WORK LS All $ 19,100.00 5 19,100.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 8 15,000.00 5 15,000.00 ; 17,738.00 $ 17,738.00 $ 16,000.00 5 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 17,440.00 8 17,440.00 14 REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTIONS LS AR § 14,700.00 $ 14,700.00 5 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 14,236.00 $ 14,236.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 27,276.00 $ 27,276.00 15 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS AR $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,00000 $ 8,150.00 $ 8,150.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 8,327.00 $ 8,327.00 16 FOUNDATION EXCAVATION CUYD 315 5 21.00 5 6,615.00 $ 22.00 § 6,930.00 5 40.00 S 12,600.00 5 15.00 5 4,725.00 5 24.00 $ 7,560.00 $ 25.00 $ 7,875.00 $ 25.00 5 7,875.00 17 GENERAL EXCAVATION CUYD 5,800 5 16.00 5 92,800.00 S 15.00 S 87,000.00 5 20.00 5 116,000.00 5 7.00 5 40,600.00 5 25.00 5 145,000.00 $ 21.00 5 121,800.00 5 16.25 $ 94,250.00 18 12 INCH SUBGRADE STABILIZATION SQYD 536 5 2250 5 12,060.00 5 19.00 5 10,184.00 $ &00 S 4,288.00 5 10.00 5 5,360.00 5 23.00 § 12,32&00 f 17.00 S 9,112.00 § 27.50 5 14,740.00 19 RIPRAP GEOTEXTILE,TYPE 1 SQYD 20 $ 7.00 S 140.00 5 9.00 5 180.00 5 6.00 $ 120.00 5 4.00 § 80.00 $ 4.00 $ 80.00 5 2.00 5 40.00 5 2.00 5 40.00 20 SUBGRADE GEO7ERT1LE SQYD 3,502 5 1.00 $ 3,502.00 5 1.00 5 3,502.00 5 1.00 5 3,502.00 5 3.00 $ 10,506.00 5 2.50 5 8,755.00 5 1.00 S 3,502.00 S 1.00 S 3,502.00 21 WRAP BASINS EACH 1.00 5 1,300.00 5 1,300.00 S 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.(0 $ 3,469.00 $ 3,469.00 5 1,600.00 5 1,600.00 1 700.00 5 700.00 5 850.00 $ 850.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 156,717.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 141,046.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 196,010.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 104,864.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 316,323.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 199,029.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 174,300.00 DRAINAGE AND SEWERS 22 a INCH SANTI_I1:1 ,I vu R 131'x.-1,I'1 I)i..I'TH FOOT 160 S 55.00 S 8,80000 S 55.1K) S 8,800.110 S 80.00 S 12,800.00 S 28.00 $ 4,480.00 S 77.00 S 12,320.00 5 90.00 5 14,4011.0I S 9400 1 S 15,040.00 23 61NCH SANITARY SEWER PIPE,10 FT DEPTH FOOT 143 5 65.00 5 9,295.00 S 66.00 S 9,438.00 5 100.00 $ 14,300.00 5 33.00 5 4,719.00 $ 83.00 § 11,869.00 5 94.00 5 13,442.00 $ 98.00 5 14,014.00 24 81NCH SANITARY SEWER PIPE,10 FT DEPTH FOOT 669 5 75.00 S 50,175.00 5 87.00 5 58,203.00 $ 100.00 $ 66,900.00 $ 33.00 $ 22,077.00 4 5 85.00 5 56,865.00 5 100.00 $ 66,900.00 $ 100.00 S 66,900.00 25 10 INCH STORM SEWER PIPE,5 FT DEPTH FOOT 110 5 45.00 5 4,950.00 5 60.00 $ 6,600.00 5 62.00 5 6,820.00 $ 49.00 5 5,390.00.5 80.00 $ 8,800.00 5 80.00 5 8,800.00 S 60.00 $ 6,600.00 26 12 INCH STORM SEWER PIPE,5 FT DEPTH FOOT 204 5 50.00 5 10,200.00 5 40.00 5 8,160.00 5 70.00 5 14,280.00 5 56.00 5 11,424.00 5 75.00 $ 15,300.00 S 8&00 S 17,952.00 $ 63.00 $ 12,852.00 27 12 INCH STORM SEWER PIPE,10 FT DEPTH FOOT 577 5 63.00 5 36,351.00 5 58.00 $ 33,466.00 5 65.00 5 37,505.00 $ 36.00 $ 20,772.00 5 80.00 $ 46,160.00 $ 70.00 5 40,390.00,S 105.00 5 60,585.00 28 15 INCH STORM SEWER PIPE,5 FT DEPTH FOOT 100 5 65.00 5 6,500.00 S 74.00 5 7,400.00 ; 77.00 5 7,700.00 5 41.00 ; 4,100.00,$ 80.00 5 8,000.00 5 98.00 S 9,800.00 § 65.00 § 6,500.00 29 15 INCH STORM SEWER PIPE,10 FT DEPTH FOOT 54 5 80.00 5 4,320.00 $ 95.00 5 5,130.00 5 80.00 5 4,320.00 5 45.00 5 2,430.00 S 116.00 5 6,264.00 5 192.00 $ 10,368.00.$ 110.00 5 5,940.00 30 42 INCH STORM SEWER PIPE,5 FT DEPTH FOOT 45 $ 150.00 5 6,750.00 $ 215.00 S 9,675.00 $ 265.00 $ 11,925.00 5 165.00 5 7,425.00 S 246.00 5 11,070.00 5 280.00 5 12,600.00 $ 185.00 $ 8,325.00 31 CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES EACH 3 $ 5,000.00 5 15,000.00 5 3,750.00 $ 11,250.00 5 3,500.00 5 10,500.00 S 2,992.00 5 8,976.00 S 2,750.00 5 8,250.00 5 4,000.00 5 12,000.00 $ 3,930.00 5 11,790.00 32 CONCRETE STORM SEWER MANHOLES EACH 0 $ 3,000.00 ; - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ; - S - 5 - $ 4,000.00 5 - _$ 3,000.00 f - 33 CONCRETE MANHOLES,LARGE PRECAST EACH 1 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 7,000.00 5 7,000.00 5 5,39200 $ 5,39200 5 6,600.00 5 6,600.00 5 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 7,117.00 $ 7,117.00 34 CONCRETE MANHOLES,WATER QUALITY EACH 2 $ 12,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 4,200.00 5 8,400.00 5 4,878.00 5 9,756.00 5 7,000.00 5 14,000.00 $ 7,000.00 5 14,000.00 $ 6,525.00 $ 13,050.00 35 CONCRETE INLETS,TYPE CG-2 EACH 1 S 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 5 1,350.00 5 1,350.00 5 2,000.00 5 2,000.00 5 2,787.00 5 2,787.00 S 1,600.00 S 1,600.00 $ 1,280.00 5 1,280.00 5 2,2'00 $ 2,282.00 36 CONCRETE INLETS,TYPE CG-30 EACH 3 5 1,700.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,175.00 $ 9,525.00 5 1,625.00 $ 4,875.00 5 2,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 2,679.00 $ 8,037.00 37 CONCRETE INLETS,TYPE CG-48 EACH 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,287.00 $ 3,287.00 5 1,760.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 2,781.00 $ 2,781.00 38 CONCRETE INLETS,TYPE CG-48 MANHOLE EACH 1 $ 3,500.00 5 3,500.00 5 3,800.00 5 3,800.00 S 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,561.00 5 2,561.00 S 2,100.00 § 2,100.00 S 4,600.00 5 4,600.00 5 4,239.00 5 4.239.00 39 CONCRETE INLETS,TYPE COMBINATION EACH II § 3,200.00 5 - $ - S - S - $ - 5 - 5 - S - 5 - 5 2,700.00 5 - S 2,500.00 $ - 40 AREA DRAIN EACH 1 S 1,300.00 5 1,300.00 S 750.00 S 750.00 5 2,000.00 S 2,000.00 $ 2,494.00 5 2,494.00 S 800.00 ; 800.00 5 1,300.00 5 1,300.00 5 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 41 ENERGY DISSIPATOR EACH I f 6,900.00 $ 6,900.00 5 6,000.00 5 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00 5 12,000.00 $ 10,376.00 $ 10,376.00 5 10,400.00 5 10,400.00 5 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 8,000.00 5 8,000.00 42 MODIFIED DITCH INLET EACH 1 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 1,600.00 5 1,600.00 5 2,000.00 5 2,000.00 i$ 2,753.00 $ 2,753.00 S 900.00 $ 900.00 5 1,000.00 5 1,000.00 $ 3,367.00 $ 3,367.00 43 ADJUSTING BOXES EACH 9 $ 125.00 $ 1,125.00 5 150.00 5 1,350.00 5 250.00 $ 2,250.00-$ 418.00 5 3,76200 $ 200.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 350.00 $ 3,150.00 $ 210.00 5 1,890.00 44 CONNECTION TO EXISTING STRUCTURES EACH 3 $ 750.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 1,000.00 5 3,000.00 5 2,000.00 5 6,000.00 $ 799.00 $ 2,397.00 $ 2,400.00 5 7,200.00 5 2,800.00 5 8,400.00 $ 1,11&00 $ 3,354.00 45 MINOR ADJUSTMENT OF MANHOLES EACH 6 $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 555.00 $ 3,330.x0 5 650.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 418.00 $ 2,508.00 $ 600.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 350.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 510.00 $ 3,060.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 209,466.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 201,802.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 243,100.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 149,391.00 SECTION TOTAL= 8 240,533.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 271,182.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 267,523.00 46 RETAINING WALL,MSE IS All $ 13,500.(X) S 13,500.00 S 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 $ 12,000.00 5 12,0(0100 S 10,962.00 S 10,962.00 S 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 S 9,200.00 5 9,200.00,S 14,706.00 5 14,706.00 47 RETAINING WALL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SEMI. IS All S 70,800.00 $ 70,800.00 S 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80.000.005 75985.00 $ 75,985.00$ 79,000.005 79,000.00 $ 72000.00 $ 72,00(1.00 ; 152,170.00 $ 152170.00 GRAVITY CANTILEVER 48 RETAINING WALL,MODIFICATI:■\ IS ' All s 14,950.00 $ 14,950.00 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 32290.00 $ 32,2290.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,00000 $ 16,778.00 $ 16,778.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 99,250.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 135,000.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 112,000.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 119,237.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 109,500.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 103,200.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 183,654.00 BASES ,: 49 COLD PLANE PAVEMI.\I RI AaIA AI.,0-2 INCHES DEEP SQYD 469 5 5.00 $ 2,345.00 $ 8.110 S 3,752.00 5 12.00 $ 5,628.(X) S 12.00 S 5,628.00 S Ii.nu S 6,097.00 5 9.0(1 $ 4,221.00 5 8.60 $ 4,033.40 ,I, AGGREGATE BASE TON 3,656 $ 18.00 $ 65,808.00 $ 24.00 $ 87,744.00 $ 18.00 $ 65,808.00 $ 23.00 5 84,088.00 S 23 00 S 91,400.00 5 20.10 5 73,120.00 $ 26.00 5 95,056.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 68,153.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 91,496.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 71,436.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 89,716.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 97,497.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 77,341.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 99,089.40 WEARING SURFACES 51 00745-LEVEL 3,1/2 INCH DENSE HMLAC TON 1,364 5 90.00 5 122,760.00 $ 71.00 S 96,844.00 5 71.00 $ 96,844.00 $ 87.00 $ 118,668.00 $ 71.00 $ 96,844.00 $ 89.00 8 121,396.00 S 82.00 5 1 111,848.00 52 EXTRA FOR ASPHALT APPROACHES(DRIVI:U'AYS) EACH 3 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,000.00 S 3,000.00 $ 550.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 810.00$ 2,430.00 $ 1,060.00 $ 3,180.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 578.00 $ 1,734.00 53 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 9 INCH THICK SQYD 2,045 S 90.00 $ 184,050.00 $ 59.00 I S 120,655.00 $ 90.00 $ 184,050.00 $ 157.00 S 321,065.00 5 83.00 $ 169,735.00 $ 135.00 $ 276,075.00 5 90.40 5 184,868.00 54 CONCRETE CURBS,CURB AND GUTTER FOOT 462 S 22.00 $ 10,164.00 $ 22.00 S 10,164.00 S 25.00 $ 11,550.00 $ 14.00 $ 6,468.00 $ 18.00 $ 8,316.00 $ 18.00 $ 8,316.00 $ 22.50 $ 10,395.00 l 55 CONCRETE CURBS,STANDARD CURB FOOT 1,564 5 13.50 $ 21,114.00 $ 15.00 $ 23,460.00 $ 20.00 $ 31,280.00 $ 12.00 $ 18,768.00 $ 15.00 $ 23,460.00 $ 11.50 $ 17,986.00 $ 15.50 $ 24,242.00 56 CONCRETEDRIVEWAYS SQFT 848 $ 6.50 $ 5,51200 $ 7.50 $ 6,360.00 $ 10.00 $ 8,480.00 $ 8.00 $ 6,784.00 $ 7.00 $ 5,936.00 $ 12.00 $ 10,176.00 $ 9.50 5 8,056.00 57 CONCRETE WALKS SQFT 19,325 $ 4.50 $ 86,96230 5 3.60 $ 69,570.00 5 5.00 $ 96,625.00 $ 5.00 $ 96,625.00 $ 4.00 $ 77,300.00 $ 5.00 $ 96,625.00 $ 6.50 $ 125,612.50 58 STAINED SCORED CONCRETE SQFT 1,103 $ 6.50 $ 7,16930 $ 7.00 $ 7,721.00 $ 2.50 S 2,757.50 $ 8.00 5 8,824.00 $ 2.00 $ 2,206.00 $ 12.00 5 13,236.00 $ 7.50 5 8,272.50 59 METAL HANDRAIL,DECORATIVE IS All $ 12,800.00 $ 12,800.00 5 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 13,885.00 $ 13,885.00 $ 21,600.00 $ 21,600.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 28,875.00 $ 28,875.00 4:54 PM 4/22/2014 Page 1 of 2 C:\Userslkathleens\AppData\Locai\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\P22OPMYZ\2014 ITB-72ND_DARTMOUTH BID SCHEDULE-Full Bid Schedule.xlsx Bid Tabulations - ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Kerr Contractors Pacific Excavation Phaze Concrete Goodfellows Bros Canby Excavating 3 Kings Environmental BID ITEM#I ITEM DESCRIPTION I UNIT(AMOUNT UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL UNIT COST TOTAL SECTION TOTAL= S 452,032.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 362,774.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 455,236.50 SECTION TOTAL= S 593,517.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 408,577.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 569,810.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 503,903.00 PERMANENT TRAFFIC CONTROL AND GUIDANCE DEVI( 60 REMOVE EXISTING SIGNS IS All $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 11100.00 $ 1,500.0() $ 1,500.00 $ 1,603.00 Y 1,603.00 $ 300.00 5 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 1,363.00 f 1,363.00 61 REMOVE AND REINSTALL EXISTING SIGNS IS All $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,0X0.00 f 1,500.00 S 1,500.00 $ 1828.00 Y 1,828.00 3 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1432.00 f 1,432.00 62 PAVEMENT LINE REMOVAL FOOT 7,200 f 0.50 S 3,600.00 1 1.00 $ 7,200.00 S 0.50 S 3,600.00 5 1.00 f 7,200.00 $ 0.50 f 3,600.00 $ 0.50 $ 3,600.00 f 0.50 $ 3,600.00 63 MONO-DIRECTIONAL WHITE TYPE 1 MARKERS EACH 72 f 5.00 S 360.00 $ 4.00 5 288.00 $ 3.50 $ 252.00 $ 4.00 $ 288.00 $ 3.50 $ 252.00 f 4.00 $ 288.00 f 4.00 $ 288.00 64 BI-DIRECTIONAL YELLOW TYPE 1 MARKERS EACH 164 Y 5.00 S 820.00 f 4.00 5 656.00 Y 3.50 Y 574.00 f 4.00 f 656.00 1 3.50 f 574.00 5 4.00 f 656.00 f 4.00 $ 656.00 65 THERMOPLASTIC,EXTRUDED,SURFACE,NON-PROFILED FOOT 14,600 5 1.00 $ 14,600.00 $ 1.00 $ 14,600.00 $ 1.00 $ 14,600.00 $ 1.00 $ 14,600.00 $ 0.80 $ 11,680.00 $ 0.80 $ 11,680.00 $ 0.89 $ 12,994.00 66 PAVEMENT BAR,TYPE AB SQFT 730 S 7.00 $ 5,110.00 $ 4.00 $ 2,920.00 f 4.00 $ 2,920.00 $ 4.00 $ 2,920.00 $ 3.50 $ 2,555.00 $ 400 $ 2,920.00 5 4.45 $ 3,248.50 67 PAVEMENT LEGEND,TYPE AB:ARROWS ,EACH 20 $ 200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 120.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 125.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 133.00 $ 2,660.00 $ 118.00 $ 2,360.00 $ 120.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 133.00 $ 2,660.00 i 68 PAVEMENT LEGEND,TYPE B-HS:BICYCLE LANE STENCIL EACH 10 S 250.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 250.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 265.00 $ 2,650.00 $ 307.00 $ 3,070.00 $ 265.00 5 2,650.00 $ 280.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 306.00 $ 3,060.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 34,490.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 32,564.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 30,096.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 34,825.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 24,971.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 25,894.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 29,301.50 PERMANENT TRAFFIC CONTROL AND ILLUMINATION S 69 rl I I.I.>i?( \RI I 1+I -.0.N>l Pp,,II I v H 21 S 125.00 $ 2,625.00 S 200.00 $ 4,200.00 S 150.00 S 3,150.(10 S 168.00 S 3,528.00 S 260.(X1 S 5,460.00 $ 195.(0 $ 4,09500 S 168.00 S 3,528.00 70 TYPE"G"SIGNS IN PLACI. SQF 1 16 $ 25.00_$ 400.00 $ 24.00 $ 384.00 $ 12.00 $ 192.00 $ 14.00 $ 224.00 $ 40.00 $ 640.00 $ 24.00 S 384.00 $ 1325 5 212.00 71 TYPE"G1"SIGNS IN PLA(.1. SQFT 0 $ 25.00 $ - _$ - $ - $ - f - $ S $ - $ - S 20.00 $ - 5 13.25 $ 72 TYPE"R"SIGNS IN PLACE SQET i 7 $ 25.00 5 175.00 f 19.00 f 133.00 $ 8.00 S 56.00 $ 9.00 $ 63.00 S 30.00 $ 210.00 S 20.00 S 140.00 5 9.25 $ 64.75 73 TYPE"W1"SIGNS IN PLACE SQFT 39 S 20.00 S 780.00 $ 19.00 f 741.00 $ 8.00 S 312.00 $ 9.00 $ 351.00 $ 30.00 f 1,170.00 ; 20.00 5 780.00 $ 9.00 $ 351.00 74 TYPE"Yt"SIGNS IN PLACE SQFT 36 S 25.00 5 900.00 f 19.00 Y 684.00 $ 8.00 S 288.00 f 9.00 S 324.00 $ 30.00 $ 1,080.00 S 20.00 S 720.00 5 9.00 $ 324.00 75 TYPE"Y2"SIGNS IN PLACE SQFT 9 5 25.00 S 225.00 1 21.00 $ 189.00 $ 12.00 $ 10&00 $ 12.00 S 10&00 5 30.00 $ 270.00 $ 22.00 S 198.00 $ 12.00 5 108.00 76 PERMANENT TYPE TIT BARRICADES EACH 3 $ 1,600.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 720.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 350.00 S 1,050.00 $ 376.00 $ 1,128.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 750.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 375.00 $ 1,125.00 77 POLE FOUNDATIONS(INSTALLATION ONLY) IS All $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 6,000.00 S 6,000.00 $ 3,590.00 $ 3,590.00 $ 8,600.00 $ 8,600.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 8,576.00 $ 8,576.00 78 SWITCHING,CONDUIT,AND WIRING LS All f 39,000.00 $ 39,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 35,670.00 $ 35,670.00 $ 50,600.00 $ 50,600.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 51,224.00 $ 51,224.00 79 REMOVAL OF EXISTING ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS IS All $ 500.00 S 500.00 $ 2,000.00 5 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 510.00 f 510.00 $ 1,460.00 S 1,460.00 5 2,200.00 f 2,200.00 5 1,155.00 $ 1,155.00 80 LIGHTING SYSTEM,DECORATIVE 1S All f 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 28,926.00 $ 28,926.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 7,000.00 5 7,000.00 $ 11,550.00 $ 11,550.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 59,405.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 78,99L00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 69,156.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 74,422.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 77,290.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 36,767.00 SECTION TOTAL S 78,217.75 RIGHT-OF-WAY ingINZPMENT AND CONTROL 81 'WATER QUALITY STRUCTLRE,\-ALLI EACH 1 $ 37,000.00 $ 37,000.00 $ 32,500.00 5 32,500.00 5 35,000.00 S 35,000.00 5 39,024.00 $ 39,024.00 5 32,000.00 5 32,000.00 S 36,000.00 5 36,000.00 S 36,500.00 $ 36,500.00 82 PERMANENT SEEDING,MIX NO.1 ACRE 0.96 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,208.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 10,356.00 $ 9,941.76 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,304.00 5 3,050.00 $ 2,928.00 $ 12,705.00 $ 12,196.80 83 PERMANENT SEEDING,MIX NO.2 ACRE 0.03 $ 10,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 33.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 330.00 $ 8,794.00 $ 263.82 $ 10,000.00 5 300.00 S 13,000.00 5 390.00 $ 12,705.00 $ 381.15 84 LAWN SEEDING ACRE 0.04 $ 8,000.00 $ 320.00 $ 13,080.00 $ 523.20 $ 15,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 9,546.00 $ 381.84 $ 13,100.00 $ 524.00 5 17,000.00 5 680.00 $ 12,705.00 5 508.20 85 TOPSOIL CY 146 $ 24.00 $ 3,504.00 $ 36.00 5 5,256.00 5 40.00 S 5,840.00 $ 28.00 $ 4,088.00 5 35.00 $ 5,110.00 5 44.00 5 6,424.00 $ 46.50 5 6,789.00 86 SOIL.CONDITIONER CY 17 f 31.00 5 527.00 $ 51.00 f 867.00 5 55.00 5 935.00 5 38.00 f 646.00 $ 50.00 $ 850.00 $ 63.00 S 1,071.00 S 46.50 f 790.50 87 DECIDUOUS TREES,3INCH CALIPER EA 34 5 350.00 f 11,900.00 5 451.00 $ 15,334.00 5 500.00 S 17,000.00`5 447.00 $ 15,198.00 f 450.00 f 15,300.00 $ 570.00 S 19,380.00 $ 520.00 f 17,680.00 88 SHRUBS,NO.I CONTAINER EA 455 5 7.00 f 3,185.00 $ 7.00 $ 3,185.00 $ 7.00 5 3,185.00 $ 12.00 $ 5,460.00 5 7.00 $ 3,185.00 $ 8.00 $ 3,640.00 $ 10.40 $ 4,732.00 89 SHRUBS,NO.1 CONTAINER(ORNAMENTAL GRASS) EA 341 S 6.85 $ 2,335.85 5 7.00 f 2,387.00 $ 7.00 5 2,387.00 $ 13.00 5 4,433.00 5 7.00 $ 2,387.00 5 8.00 5 2,728.00 $ 10.40 f 3,546.40 90 BARK MULCH CY 16 S 33.50 $ 536.00 5 51.00 Y 816.00 5 55.00 5 880.00 $ 101.00 S 1,616.00 5 50.00 5 800.00 $ 60.00 f 960.00 5 52.00 S 832.00 91 ROOT BARRIER FOOT 1,088 5 8.09 $ 8,801.92 $ 7.00 5 7,616.00 $ 7.00 5 7,616.00 $ 7.00 $ 7,616.00 5 6.00 $ 6,528.00 5 3.75 5 4,080.00 5 12.10 $ 13,164.80 92 CL-4R CHAIN-LINK FENCE FOOT 86 $ 12.00 $ 1,032.00 5 29.00 $ 2,494.00 S 30.00 $ 2,580.00 $ 47.00 $ 4,04200 3 41.00 $ 3,526.00 $ 30.00 $ 2,580.00 $ 32.50 $ 2,795.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 70,641.77 SECTION TOTAL= S 73,219.20 SECTION TOTAL= S 78,753.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 92,710.42 SECTION TOTAL= S 72,814.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 80,861.00 SECTION TOTAL $ 99,915.85 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 93 IRRIGATION SYSTEILS LS A8 f 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 5 33,000.00 5 33,000.00 5 28,972.00 5 28,972.00 S 13,500.00 S 13,500.00 5 17,(00.(0 S 17,000.00 5 1..,127.00 f 12,127.00 c,1 NCH POTABLE WATER PIPE,FITTINGS AND FOOT 219 $ 65.00 $ 14,235.00 $ 76.00 $ 16,644.00 5 80.00 5 17,520.00 $ 41.00 $ 8,979.00 $ 74.00 $ 16,206.00 $ 55.00 S 12,045.00 S 59.00 $ 12,921.00 94 COUPLINGS WITH CLASS D BACKFILL 95 TEMPORARY BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY EACH 4 5 2,200.00'f 8,800.00 5 1,100.00 S 4,400.00 S 3,200.00 5 12,800.00 f 1,542.00 5 6,16&00 5 1,700.00 5 6,800.00 f 1,500.00 5 6,000.00 S 1,860.00 5 7,440.00 96 6INCH CONNECTION TO 12 INCH EXISTING MAIN EACH 4 $ 1,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,500.00 S 14,000.00 S 4,500.00 Y 18,000.00 $ 3,640.00 5 14,560.00 $ 4,000.00 5 16,000.00 $ 3,600.00 S 14,400.00 $ 4,830.00 5 19,320.00 97 2 INCH WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS EACH - 1 $ 1,200.00 5 - 5 2,500.00 5 - S - S - 5 1,412.00 S - $ 500.00 S - S 5,000.00 S - S 1,200.00 5 - SECTION TOTAL= $ 41,035.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 49,044.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 81,320.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 58,679.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 52,506.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 49,445.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 51,808.00 UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING _ ¢ 9a UTILITY V 901.1,TYPE FRONTIER 35'HAND EACH 3 5 2,920.00 S 8,7611.00 5 4750.00 S 14 250.181 5 4,51x1.W S 13,510.00 5 4,4(19.(0 S 13,227.00 S 4,200.00 S 12,640.00 S 4,200.00 S 12,6(0.(0 5 5,(00.(01 S 15,000.00 99 UTILITY VAULT,TYPE PGE 233 EACH 1 S 1,530.00 $ 1,530.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 S 215.00 $ 2,215.00 5 16110.00 $ 1,600.00 5 1.750.(10 $ 1,750.00 $ 2r 95.00 5 2.'-95.00 100 1TIIIII'Y VAULT,TYPE PGE 577 EACH I 5 5,400.00 $ 5,400.00 5 4,150.00 5 4,150.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,407.00 $ 5,407.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 4800.00 $ 4,800.00_$ 5,579.00 $ 5,579.00 101 UTILITY VAULT,TYPE PGE 5106 EACH 2 S 8,700.00 $ 17,400.00 5 7,500.00 5 15,000.00 S 9,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 9,108.00 $ 18216.00 $ 7,000.00 5 14,000.00 $ 8700.00 f 17,400.00 $ 861600 $ 17,232.00 102 UTILITY VAULT,TYPE PGE 5106(INSTALLATION ONLY) EACH ] S 1,740.00 $ 1,740.00 i 1,100.00 5 1,100.00 $ 3,2(10.00 $ 3,200.00 5 707.(X1 S 707.00 5 1,000.00 5 1,000.00 S 960.00 S 960.00 f 1,180.00 5 1,180.00 103 UTILITY VAULT,TYPE COMCAST 233 EACH 5 S 1,285.00 $ 6,425.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 7,750.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 2,003.00 5 10,015.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 2,050.00 $ 10,250.00 104 UTILITY VAULT,TYPE AT&T 264 EACH 3 S 2,230.00 $ 6,690.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 7,300.00 $ 3,237.00 5 9,711.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 2,500.00 S 7,500.00 $ 3,30200 $ 9,906.00 105 1TIII17Y CONDUIT,2"DIAM. LF 10,120 S 3.00 $ 30,360.00 S 1.40 $ 14,168.00 $ 2.00 5 20,240.00 $ 3.00 S 30,360.00 $ 200 $ 20,2 40.00 $ 2.45 $ 24,794.00 S 1.10 $ 11,132.00 106 UTILITY CONDUIT,4"DIAM. IF 7,062 5 4.00 $ 28,248.00 $ 3.20 $ 22,598.40 $ 3.50 $ 24,717.00 $ 7.00 $ 49,434.00 $ 3.00 $ 21,186.00 $ 4.00 $ 28,248.00 $ 3.00 $ 21,186.00 107 UTILITY CONDUIT,6"DLAM. LF 2,675 $ 5.00 $ 13,375.00 $ 6.00 $ 16,050.00 $ 5.50 5 14,712.50 $ 10.00 $ 26,750.00 $ 5.00 $ 13,375.00 5 7.00 $ 18,725.00 $ 5.60 $ 14,980.00 100 UTILITY TRENCH EXCAVATION,BIDDING,AND CY $ 50,830.00 $ 49,725.00 $ 60,775.00 S 51,935.00 $ 66,300.00 $ 132,600.00 5 62,985.00 BACKFILL 1,105 $ 46.00 5 4500 S 55.00 5 47.00 Y 60.00 5 120.00 $ 57.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 170,758.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 153,991.40 SECTION TOTAL= $ 180,144.50 SECTION TOTAL= $ 217,977.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 170,701.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 256,877.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 171,725.00 NEW ITEMS 109 CONCRETE INLETS,TYPE G-2 EACH 3 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,50(1.(0 5 1,600.00 Y 1,800.00 $ 2000.00 b 6,000.00 S 2,559.00 $ 7,677.00 $ 1550.00 $ 4,650.00 $ 2,150.00 $ 6,450.10 $ 2,060.00 f 6,180.00 110 SINGLE MAILBOX SUPPORTS EACH 2 $ 275.00 $ 550.00 5 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 324.00 $ 648.00 5 400.00 $ 800.00 $ 185.00 S 370.00 S 500.00 $ 1,000.00 III UTILITY VAULT,TYPE 7WTC 233 EACH 4 $ 1,530.00 $ 6,120.00 $ 1,750.00 S 7,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 2,451.00 $ 9,804.00 $ 1,600.00 S 6,400.00 $ 1,800.005 7,200.00 $ 2,060.005 8,240.00 112 ELMHURST DETOUR IS AU $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,700.00 5 6,700.00 5 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 7,632.00 $ 7,632.00 $ 14,500.00 S 14,500.00 $ 11,000.00 S 11,000.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 5,200.00 SECTION TOTAL= ; 17,170.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 19,100.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 17,500.00 SECTION TOTAL= 5 25,761.00 SECTION TOTAL= S 26,350.00 SECTION TOTAL= $ 25,020.00 SECTION TOTAL $ 20,620.00 .CORRECTED BID TOTAL $1,610,381.77 $ 1,552,946.20 $ 1,787,692.00 $ 1,789,352.42 $ 1,849,165.00 $ 1,977,633.00 $ 1,944 (SUBMITTED BID TOTAL $ 1,562,936.00 $ 1,787,692.00 $ 1,813,033.42 $ 1,877,455.00 $ 1,975,483.00 $ 2,113,871.20 4:54 PM 4/22/2014 C:\Users\kathleens\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\P220PMYZ\2014 ITB-72ND_DARTMOUTH BID SCHEDULE-Full Bud Schedule.xlsx Page 2 of 2 AIS-1747 B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Alarm Systems Ordinance TMC 11.08 Prepared For: Alan Orr,Police Submitted By: Cathy Wheatley, Administrative Services Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Receive and File Business Mtg- Study Sess. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Briefing on the staff recommendation to revise the Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems Ordinance (TMC 11.08) to clarify procedures and definitions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems Ordinance (TMC 11.08) be revised with current language and definitions. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Staff recommends the following revisions to Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems Ordinance (TMC 11.08): Title changed from"Burglary and Robbery Alarm Systems" to "Alarm Systems" Updated language and additional definitions Addition of Enhanced Call Verification Definition:All alarm businesses monitoring burglar alarm systems located within the City of Tigard,prior to making a police alarm dispatch request will attempt a verification call to the alarmed premises and if no responsible party is located on the initial verification call,attempt a second verification call to another number designated by the alarm user. Addition of Protection Sweep Definition:Any person who obtains or renews an alarm permit after the date of enactment of this section will be provided with a form requesting consent for the police to enter and perform a protective sweep of any building or residence where an alarm is activated,the building or residence is unsecured or shows sign of forcible entry,and no responsible person is immediately available to give or refuse consent to enter. The alarm coordinator shall notify the Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency (WCCCA) of all properties where the owner does not grant consent under this section,and shall request that WCCCA put a flag on the property notifying responding officers of the lack of consent. This ordinance is scheduled for council consideration at its May 13,2014 business meeting. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments T11C 11.08 Redline Version-Showing Proposed Changes TIM 11.08 Showing Version with Proposed Changes Incorporated TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 11.08 5)stems to prevent unnecessary police emergency ALARM SYSTEMS. responses to false alarms and thereby protect the Sections: emergency response capability of the city from misuse. 11.08.000 Title. 11.08.010 Purpose And-Seope. •_ - - -- -• 11.08.020 Definitions. -• , 11.08.030 Alarm User-Permits-Required. - 11.08.040 Emergency Notification. .(Ord.82-32§2,1982). 11.08.050 . Protective Sweep. 11.08.020 Definitions. 11.08.060 Renew-Permit.Nuisance Alarms. 1. "Alarm business" means the business by any 11.08.070 Delinquent Application. individual, partnership, corporation, or other entity 11.08.080 Exemption-For-governmental of selling, leasing, maintaining, servicing, Political Unit. repairing,altering,replacing, moving, or installing any 11.08.090 + alarm system in or on any building. structure, or Resources Person. User Instructions Required. _ •• _ _ _ - 11.08.100 Auto Dialing = = •••••• or Devices. facility. Alarm businesses include any person, 11.08.110 business. or organization that monitors alarm systems and initiates alarm dispatch requests. Prohibited Enhanced Call Verification. 2. "Alarm dispatch" means the initiation of a 11.08.120 Equipment Standard. communication to dispatch. by an alarm business indicating an alarm has been activated.and requesting 11.08.130 Government Immunity. police response to the alarm site. !• Pee—Assessment 2. "Alarm system" means any assembly of 11.08.140 False Alarm Fees. equipment,mechanical or electrical,arranged to signal _ ..• the occurrence of an illegal entry or other activity requiring urgent attention and to which police are 11.08.150 Penalties. expeeted-to may respond. This definition does not include car.medical or fire alarms. 11.08.160 Alarm Permit Revoked. 11.08.170 Confidentiality— iss 4. "Alarm user" means the a person, firm, 11.08.180 partnership, association, corporation, company or organization of any kind in control of any building, Interpretation. structure or facility within the City of Tigard in 11.08.190 which an alarm system is wed-used. Senior Citizen Exemption. 11.08.200 5. "Automatic dialing device" means a device Allocation of Revenues. his connected to a telephone line or internet 11.08.000 Title. connection and--is programmed to select a This ordinance shall be known as the predetermined telephone number or internet location "alarm ordinance" for the City of Tigard. (URL address)and transmit by voice message or code signal an emergency message indicating a need for 11.08.010 Purpose. emergency response. The purpose of this chapter is to „, „ misuse encourage alarm users and alarm businesses to - - - assume increased responsibility for maintaining the - - mechanical reliability and the proper use of alarm 11-08-1 Code Update: 01/04 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE alarm user and to direct an emergency response. 1. "Chief" means the City of Tigard Chief of Police.or designee. 14. "Primary trunk line" means a telephone line serving the police dispatch center that is designated 7. "City"means the City of Tigard. to receive emergency*police calls. 8. "Coordinator" means the individual designated la. "Permit" means an alarm permit. issued by the by the chief ofe to issue alarm permits age City of Tigard. and enforce the provisions of this chapter. 1¢. "Permit renewal" means applying for a new 9. "Current alarm permit" means an alarm permit permit to replace an expired permit, where_the alarm that is not expired or revoked. and does not have any system is designed and used for substantially the same outstanding fees.fines or penalties. building.facility.or structure. 1Q. "Dispatch center" means the i3 the County facility used to receive emergency and general Ord. 03- information from the public. 12,Ord. 87-73 §2, 1987;Ord. 82-32§3,1982). u. "False alarm" means an alarm signal, capable of 11.08.030 Alarm User Permits-Required. eliciting a response by police when a situation requiring a response by the police does not in fact Every alarm user shall obtain an alarm user exist. An alarm is not considered false permit for if there are signs of forced or Coordinator their alarm system from the attempted entry: natural coordinator's office upon.the effective date of the circumstances (heavy wind: ordinance codified in this chapter or prior to use notification from the alarm company of an alarm system. that the system is faulty before an .. .. officer arrives on the scene: notification from the user that the .. _ ... .. _ system or the user erred before an :::- - -. officer arrives on the scene: or if a -: -•• neighbor comes forward to indicate 1n their observance of suspicious application for a permit shall be filed annually activity when no apparent entry or with the coordinator's office. required by the attempted entry can be determined chief. Each permit shall bear the signature of the otherwise. chief and shall be valid for a one-year period, The _ .. fees and fines of alarm permits are included in the .. ... .. City of Tigard Fees and Charges Schedule. The permit shall be kept physically placed upon alarm user: the premises using the alarm system, near the main entrance to be visible to - :. -: - ---.-• : • responding police officers. and 3hall be les rcpresemini (Ord. 03-12, Ord. 02-05 12. "Interconnect" means to connect an alarm 01-21, Ord. 82-32 §4(a), 1982). A separate alarm system including an automatic dialing device, to a permit is required for each alarm site. telephone line or computer network connection either directly or through a mechanical device that utilizes a 11.08.0411 Emergency Notification telephone or computer telephefte– .e—to transmit a message upon the The alarm registration shall be in a form activation of the alarm system. prescribed by the chief. and shall include the name, address and telephone number(s) of individual(s) 1I. "Monitoring center" means a facility used to authorized by the alarm user to act on their behalf in receive emergency and general information from an case of emergencies.alarms and false alarms. 11-08-2 Code Update: 01/04 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE business or residence from further entry or damage, 11.08.050 unless the owner or other responsible person is Protective Sweep present on the scene prior to the departure of the officer. . 11.08.070 .. ... . Person: Delinquent Application : - The alarm permitee shall provide the police City Couneil. (0th. 02-05,Ord.82-32§4(d),1982). :.. .:. :.. ... .. (Ord. 82-32§4(g),1982) Any person who obtains or renews an alarm permit after the dare of enactment of this section will A late charge will be added to the permit fee of be provided with a form requesting consent for the an alarm user who fails to obtain a permit within 60 police to enter and perform a protective sweep of any days or by an alarm user who fails to renew a permit building or residence where an alarm is activated. the within 60 days after a permit has expired. building or residence is unsecured or shows signs of forcible entry. and no responsible person is 11.08.0$(1 . Governmental immediately available to give or refuse consent to 1m� enter. The alarm coordinator shall notify dispatch of all . . . :-- . properties where the owner does not grant consent .. . .. under this section.and shall request that dispatch flag the property to notify responding officers of the lack : .. .. ... of consent. • . 11.08.0¢0 _. . .-.... .... .. Political-Unit. Nuisance Alarms (0th. .. • 82-32§4(f),1982). section and then to distribute the revised n r •3 alarm users. (Ord.82-32§5, 1982). Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a police officer responding to an alarm may disable the A governmental unit alarm user shall be subject alarm when no responsible person is readily available to this chapter:but a permit shall be issued without a to silence the alarm and the alarm is disturbing the fee and shall not be subiect to revocation, additional peace.health or repose of the neighbors. Such alarms fees.fines or penalties. are deemed public nuisances, and police officers are hereby authorized to immediately abate such 11.08.090 nuisances by disabling the alarm. User Instructions Required. The police officer must use the least destructive 1. It i3 unlawful for any person to program an method available to disable the alarm. and shall provide notice to the homeowner of the time and reason the alarm was disabled. The notice may be -• - posted upon the main entrance of the residence or business. . . . • If the police officer forced entry into a building Tigard City Police .Department that it 13 so or residence to disable an alarm, prior to leaving, the police officer will take responsible steps to secure the 11-08-3 Code Update: 01/04 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE or any 9-1-1 prefix requiring police response;and it is -:• . _ unlawful for an alarm user to fail to disconnect or = _ reprogram an automatic dialing device programmed to _ select a primary trunk line within twelve hours of disconnected: receipt of written notice from the Tigard Police Department that it is so programmed. 11.08.110 - - - , • - . Enhanced Call Verification (Ord. 82-32 §6, _ .. •. 1982). _ Any alarm business selling.leasing.or furnishing an alarm system installed in the City of Tigard shall provide the alarm user with operating instructions for the alarm system. shall notify the alarm user of the alarm permit requirement, and provide an alarm permit application and a fee schedule. _ The alarm business shall maintain records ...: ..: . . demonstrating compliance with this section. and provide documentation to the chief's office upon -:- request. Calls for emergency response to alarm event - by an alarm business must include the corresponding :. alarm permit number. _ 11.08.100 Auto Dialing - - Devices -"- . .. 1. Whenever an alarm is activated in the City ! : • - .. . .. . : ... ... . (Ord. 03-12,Ord. 02-05,Ord.01- • 21,Ord.87-73§3(Exhibit A(part)),1987). . All alarm businesses monitoring alarm systems in the City of Tigard. will attempt a verification call to the alarmed premise and if no responsible party is located on the initial verification call. a second verification call will be made prior to the alarm = _ business requesting a police alarm dispatch request. , ... . . " - " ... - - . .: ; - - .. 11.08.12Q a Alarms Equipment Standard reasenable—time—thereafter. (0th. 87-73 §3(Exhibit . A(part)),1987). :. It is unlawful for any person to program an Y automatic dialing device to select a primary trunk line l furnishing 11-08-4 Code Update: 01/04 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE :. .... . . Y .. ... . .: (0th.87-73§3(Exhibit A(part)),1987). , Alarm registration does not create a contract, duty. or obligation- either expressed or implied. of response to an alarm. All liability and consequential damage resulting from the failure to respond to a notification is hereby disclaimed and governmental _ :• .: immunity as provided by law is retained. • The alarm user acknowledges that law . (Ord.01-21,Ord. 93-13 enforcement response may be influenced by factors §1,1993). such as availability of police units. priority of calls, weather conditions. traffic conditions. emergency Alarm businesses installing alarm systems in the conditions.staffing levels.and prior response history. City of Tigard shall use alarm control panels that meet SIA Control Panel Standard CP-01. Alarm businesses 11.08.140 will maintain records demonstrating compliance with False Alarm Fees. this section.and provide documentation to the chief's .: :.. office upon request. 11.08.1 :.. , . .. ... . Government Immunity. .. .... . :.. ... (Ord.01-21,Ord.82-32§8,1982). An alarm user incurring a false alarm shall be subject_to a fee established by the chief. The user shall be notified by mail of a false alarm occurrence Y _ and payment shall be made to the alarm coordinator • :• •• -:: •• within thirty days of receipt of the notice. •: .• ._ , -. •::. - " •: •- : _ .. . -- At the chief's discretion- the coordinator shall - notify the alarm user of excessive false alarms and• direct the user to submit a report within ten days of the notice describing actions to be taken to eliminate the cause of false alarms. Failure to submit a report as directed shall be grounds for revocation of the alarm permit. .• . Code Update: 01/04 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 11.08.150 . Penalties rc111sialement tee. No alarm permit may be reinstated until all outstanding fees. fines or penalties are paid in Alarm users incurring three or more false alarm full. within a permit year shall be subject to a fine. The user will be notified by mail of the fine.and payment 11.08.160 Enforeement—And—Penalties: Ma= shall be made to the alarm coordinator within thirty Permit Revoked days of receipt of the notice. Additional penalties will be charged to a user that dollars: is more than sixty days delinquent in paying false alarm fees,fines or penalties. At the chief's discretion, the alarm coordinator shall notify the alarm user of excessive false alarms and direct the user to submit a • .. - .:-. Ord. 82-32 report within ten days of receipt to the notice §10,1982). describing the actions to be taken to eliminate the cause of the false alarms. It is unlawful to generate additional false alarms on a permit that has been revoked and not reinstated. Failure to pay a renewal fee. false alarm fee. or Any alarm user who has had their alarm permit fine within ninety days shall result in revocation of the revoked shall take steps to disable the alarm or alarm permit until all fees are paid. The alarm user otherwise configure the alarm system so it does not shall be notified by mail that no further law generate additional false alarms. enforcement response to alarms at that property will be forthcoming. The alarm user shall have fourteen Notwithstanding the fact that police response has days from the date of the revocation notice to make been discontinued due to revocation, generating payment arrangements with the chief's office. If fees additional false alarms,after an alarm permit has been remain unpaid and no payment arrangement is made revoked and not reinstated, constitutes a violation of at the expiration of fourteen days after the date of the this Code and is punishable by a fine. revocation notice, the chief's office shall notify dispatch of the revocation and shall request that 11.08.170 Confidentiality. dispatch flag the property for non-response on any additional alarms generated at the property until the All information supplied on an alarm permit permit is reinstated. application is recognized as personally confidential and will be withheld from disclosure under public If more than six false alarms are generated within records law to the extent allowable under the law. a twelve-month period. the alarm coordinator may revoke the alarm permit for a period of not more than 11.08.180 Interpretation. one year. This revocation shall be in addition to and separate from any false alarm fines. The alarm user This chapter shall be liberally construed to affect shall be notified by mail of the revocation and the fact the purpose of the ordinance codified and to achieve that no further police response will be forthcoming uniform interpretation and application of the for alarms generated at the property. The alarm user respective ordinances. will have fourteen days from the date of the revocation notice to petition the chief's office for 11.08,190 Senior Citizen Exemption. reconsideration. Requests to reconsider a revocation under this section will be considered if all fees, fines If a residential alarm user is over the age of sixty, and penalties are current and a written plan to resolve or physically handicapped.and is the primary resident false alarms is submitted. of the residence and no business is conducted in the residence. a permit may be obtained without the If no petition for reconsideration is made or if payment of a fee. the chief denies the petition. the chief's office shall notify the alarm user and dispatch of the revocation. 11.08.200 Allocation of Revenues. The property will be flagged for nonresponse on any additional alarms generated at the property. until the All penalties collected pursuant to this chapter shall be alarm permit is reinstated. Any alarm user who has deposited to the city general fund. had their alarm permit revoked shall pay a 11-08-6 Code Update: 01/04 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 11.08 ALARM SYSTEMS. which police may respond. This definition does not include car,medical or fire alarms. Sections: 11.08.000 Tide. 4. "Alarm user" means a person, firm, partnership, 1108.010 Purpose. association, corporation, company, or organization of any 11.08.020 Definitions. kind in control of any building, structure, or facility within 1108.030 Alarm Permit Required. the City of Tigard in which an alarm system is used. 11.08.040 Emergency Notification. 1108.050 Protective Sweep. 5. "Automatic dialing device" means a device 11.08.060 Nuisance Alarms. connected to a telephone line or internet connection 11.08.070 Delinquent Application. programmed to select a predetermined telephone number or 11.08.080 Governmental Unit. internet location (URL address) and transmit by voice 11.08.090 User Instructions Required. message or code signal an emergency message indicating a 11.08.100 Auto Dialing Devices. need for emergency response. 11.08.110 Enhanced Call Verification. 11.08.120 Equipment Standard. 6. "Chief" means the City of Tigard Chief of Police, 11.08.130 Government Immunity. or designee. 11.08.140 False Alarm Fees. 11.08.150 Penalties. 7. "City"means the City of Tigard. 11.08.160 Alarm Permit Revoked. 11.08.170 Confidentiality. 8. "Coordinator" means the individual designated by 11.08.180 Interpretation. the chief to issue alarm permits and enforce the provisions 11.08.190 Senior Citizen Exemption. of this chapter. 11.08.200 Allocation of Revenues. 9. "Current alarm permit"means an alarm permit that 11.08.000 Tide. is not expired or revoked,and does not have any outstanding fees,fines or penalties. This ordinance shall be known as the "alarm ordinance"for the City of Tigard. 10. "Dispatch center"means the facility used to receive emergency and general information from the public. 11.08.010 Purpose. 11. "False alarm" means an alarm signal, capable of The purpose of this chapter is to encourage alarm eliciting a response by police when a situation requiring a users and alarm businesses to assume increased responsibility response by the police does not in fact exist. An alarm is not for maintaining the mechanical reliability and the proper use considered false if there are signs of forced or attempted of alarm systems to prevent unnecessary police emergency entry; natural circumstances (heavy wind); notification from responses to false alarms and thereby protect the emergency the alarm company that the system is faulty before an officer response capability of the city from misuse. arrives on the scene; notification from the user that the system or the user erred before an officer arrives on the 11.08.020 Definitions. scene; or if a neighbor comes forward to indicate their observance of suspicious activity when no apparent entry or 1. "Alarm business" means the business by any attempted entry can be determined otherwise. individual, partnership, corporation, or other entity, of selling, leasing, maintaining, servicing, repairing, altering, 12. "Interconnect" means to connect an alarm system replacing,moving,or installing any alarm system in or on any including an automatic dialing device, to a telephone line or building, structure,or facility. Alarm businesses include any computer network connection either directly or through a person, business, or organization that monitors alarm mechanical device that utilizes a telephone or computer to systems and initiates alarm dispatch requests. transmit a message upon the activation of the alarm system. 2. "Alarm dispatch" means the initiation of a 13. "Monitoring center"means a facility used to receive communication to dispatch, by an alarm business indicating emergency and general information from an alarm user and an alarm has been activated, and requesting police response to direct an emergency response. to the alarm site. 14. "Primary trunk line"means a telephone line serving the police dispatch center that is designated to receive police 3. "Alarm system"means any assembly of equipment, calls. mechanical or electrical,arranged to signal the occurrence of an illegal entry or other activity requiring urgent attention to 15. "Permit"means an alarm permit,issued by the City TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE of Tigard. abate such nuisances by disabling the alarm. 16. "Permit renewal"means applying for a new permit The police officer must use the least destructive to replace an expired permit, where the alarm system is method available to disable the alarm, and shall provide designed and used for substantially the same building,facility notice to the homeowner of the time and reason the alarm or structure. was disabled. The notice may be posted upon the main entrance of the residence or business. 11.08.030 Alarm Permit Required. If the police officer forced entry into a building or Every alarm user shall obtain an alarm permit for residence to disable an alarm, prior to leaving, the police their alarm system from the coordinator's office upon the officer will take responsible steps to secure the business or effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter or residence from further entry or damage,unless the owner or prior to use of an alarm system. other responsible person is present on the scene prior to the departure of the officer. An application for a permit shall be filed annually with the coordinator's office, required by the chief. Each 11.08.070 Delinquent Application. permit shall bear the signature of the chief and shall be valid for a one-year period. The fees and fine of alarm permits are A late charge will be added to the permit fee of an included in the City of Tigard Fees and Charges Schedule. alarm user who fails to obtain a permit within 60 days or by an alarm user who fails to renew a permit within 60 days The permit shall be physically placed upon the after a permit has expired. premises using the alarm system, placed near the main entrance to be visible to responding police officers. A 11.08.080 Governmental Unit. separate alarm permit is required for each alarm site. A governmental unit alarm user shall be subject to 11.08.040 Emergency Notification. this chapter; but a permit shall be issued without a fee and shall not be subject to revocation, additional fees, fines or The alarm registration shall be in a form prescribed penalties. by the chief, and shall include the name, address and telephone number(s) of invidual(s) authorized by the alarm 11.08.090 User Instructions Required. user to act on their behalf in case of emergencies,alarms and false alarms. Any alarm business selling,leasing,or furnishing an alarm system installed in the City of Tigard shall provide the 11.08.050 Protective Sweep. alarm user with operating instructions for the alarm system, shall notify the alarm user of the alarm permit requirement, Any person who obtains or renews an alarm permit and provide an alarm permit application and a fee schedule. after the date of enactment of this section will be provided with a form requesting consent for the police to enter and The alarm business shall maintain records perform a protective sweep of any building or residence demonstrating compliance with this section, and provide where an alarm is activated, the building or residence is documentation to the chief's office upon request. Calls for unsecured or shows signs of forcible entry, and no emergency response to alarm event by an alarm business responsible person is immediately available to give or refuse must include the corresponding alarm permit number. consent to enter. 11.08.100Auto Dialing Devices. The alarm coordinator shall notify dispatch of all properties where the owner does not grant consent under It is unlawful for any person to program an this section,and shall request that dispatch flag the property automatic dialing device to select a primary trunk line or any to notify responding officers of the lack of consent. 9-1-1 prefix requiring police response; and it is unlawful for an alarm user to fail to disconnect or reprogram an automatic 11.08.060 Nuisance Alarms. dialing device programmed to select a primary trunk line within twelve hours of receipt of written notice from the Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a Tigard Police Department that it is so programmed. police officer responding to an alarm may disable the alarm when no responsible person is readily available to silence the 11.08.110 Enhanced Call Verification. alarm and the alarm is disturbing the peace,health or repose of the neighbors. Such alarms are deemed public nuisances, All alarm businesses monitoring alarm systems in and police officers are hereby authorized to immediately the City of Tigard, will attempt a verification call to the TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE alarmed premise and if no responsible party is located on the of receipt to the notice describing the actions to be taken to initial verification call,a second verification call will be made eliminate the cause of the false alarms. prior to the alarm business requesting a police alarm dispatch request. Failure to pay a renewal fee, false alarm fee,or fine within ninety days shall result in revocation of the alarm 11.08.120Equipment Standard. permit until all fees are paid. The alarm user shall be notified by mail that no further law enforcement response to alarms Alarm businesses installing alarm systems in the at that property will be forthcoming. The alarm user shall City of Tigard shall use alarm control panels that meet SIA have fourteen days from the date of the revocation notice to Control Panel Standard CP-01. Alarm businesses will make payment arrangements with the chief's office. If fees maintain records demonstrating compliance with this remain unpaid and no payment arrangement is made at the section, and provide documentation to the chief's office expiration of fourteen days after the date of the revocation upon request. notice, the chief's office shall notify dispatch of the revocation and shall request that dispatch flag the property 11.08.130Government Immunity. for non-response on any additional alarms generated at the property until the permit is reinstated. Alarm registration does not create a contract,duty, or obligation, either expressed or implied, of response to an If more than six false alarms are generated within a alarm. All liability and consequential damage resulting from twelve-month period,the alarm coordinator may revoke the the failure to respond to a notification is hereby disclaimed alarm permit for a period of not more than one year. This and governmental immunity as provided by law is retained, revocation shall be in addition to and separate from any false alarm fines. The alarm user shall be notified by mail of the revocation and the fact that no further police response will The alarm user acknowledges that law enforcement be forthcoming for alarms generated at the property. The response may be influenced by factors such as availability of alarm user will have fourteen days from the date of the police units, priority of calls, weather conditions, traffic revocation notice to petition the chief's office for conditions, emergency conditions, staffing levels, and prior reconsideration. Requests to reconsider a revocation under response history. this section will be considered if all fees, fines and penalties are current and a written plan to resolve false alarms is 11.08.140False Alarm Fees. submitted. An alarm user incurring a false alarm shall be If no petition for reconsideration is made or if the subject to a fee established by the chief. The user shall be chief denies the petition, the chief's office shall notify the notified by mail of a false alarm occurrence and payment alarm user and dispatch of the revocation. The property will shall be made to the alarm coordinator within thirty days of be flagged for nonresponse on any additional alarms receipt of the notice. generated at the property,until the alarm permit is reinstated. Any alarm user who has had their alarm permit revoked shall At the chief's discretion, the coordinator shall pay a reinstatement fee. No alarm permit may be reinstated notify the alarm user of excessive false alarms and direct the until all outstanding fees,fines or penalties are paid in full. user to submit a report within ten days of the notice describing actions to be taken to eliminate the cause of false 11.08.160Alarm Permit Revoked. alarms. Failure to submit a report as directed shall be grounds for revocation of the alarm permit. It is unlawful to generate additional false alarms on a permit that has been revoked and not reinstated. Any 11.08.150Penalties. alarm user who has had their alarm permit revoked shall take steps to disable the alarm or otherwise configure the alarm Alarm users incurring three or more false alarms system so it does not generate additional false alarms. within a permit year shall be subject to a fine. The user will be notified by mail of the fine,and payment shall be made to Notwithstanding the fact that police response has the alarm coordinator within thirty days of receipt of the been discontinued due to revocation, generating additional notice. false alarms,after an alarm permit has been revoked and not reinstated, constitutes a violation of this Code and is Additional penalties will be charged to a user that is punishable by a fine. more than sixty days delinquent in paying false alarm fees, fines or penalties. At the chief's discretion, the alarm 11.08.170Confidentiality. coordinator shall notify the alarm user of excessive false alarms and direct the user to submit a report within ten days All information supplied on an alarm permit TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE application is recognized as personally confidential and will be withheld from disclosure under public records law to the extent allowable under the law. 11.08.180 Interpretation. This chapter shall be liberally construed to affect the purpose of the ordinance codified and to achieve uniform interpretation and application of the respective ordinances. 11.08.190Senior Citizen Exemption. If a residential alarm user is over the age of sixty,or physically handicapped, and is the primary resident of the residence and no business is conducted in the residence, a permit may be obtained without the payment of a fee. 11.08.200 Allocation of Revenues. All penalties collected pursuant to this chapter shall be deposited to the city general fund. • AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-B CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: April 22, 2014 (Please keep remarks to around 2-5 minutes. If a large number of citizens have signed in,the Mayor may ask that testimony be kept to around 2 minutes.) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: Also, please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City 1 State Zip Phone No. Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION AIS-1752 3. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes Submitted By: Carol Krager, City Management Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: Publication Date: Information ISSUE Approve City Council meeting minutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve minutes as submitted. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached council minutes are submitted for City Council approval. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments February 18,2014 Council Meeting Minutes March 18,2014 Council Meeting Minutes A AIS-1534 3. B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Authorize the Mayor to Execute an Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro Regarding a CET Grant for the River Terrace Community Plan Prepared For: Debbie Smith-Wagar Submitted By: Debbie Smith-Wagar Financial and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the council authorize the mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement(IGA) with Metro regarding the Construction Excise Tax (CET) funded Grant for the River Terrace Community Plan? STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST Authorize the mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Metro regarding the Construction Excise Tax (CET) funded Grant for the River Terrace Community Plan. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In September,2013,Tigard was awarded a $245,000 CET grant from Metro for the River Terrace Community Plan (one of two awarded to Tigard in the cycle). The grant will be used to help fund key elements of the River Terrace Community Plan,including updates to the various system infrastructure master plans and helping to develop a financing strategy plan. Updates to the master plans will help the city develop system development charge updates as well. Staff worked with Metro staff on developing Exhibit A to the IGA, which outlines the milestones, deliverables,due dates,and grant disbursements.The IGA and Exhibit A have been reviewed the city's and Metro's attorneys. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could propose changes to the IGA,or choose not to approve it and not receive the grant. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS River Terrace Community Plan DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION On April 9,2013, the Council approved the application for this grant. Attachments Metro CET IGA Exhibit A AIS-1652 3. C. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes):Consent Item Agenda Title: Adopt a Resolution Approving the Westside Trail Master Plan and Adding that Plan to the Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan Prepared For: Steve Martin,Public Works Submitted By: Renee Ferguson, Public Works Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall council adopt a resolution approving the Westside Trail Master Plan and adding that plan to the Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan? STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the council adopts the resolution. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The council was briefed on the Westside Trail Master Plan at its April 15,2014,workshop meeting. The Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan was completed in 2011.The plan did not include the Westside Trail,because at the time Metro had started multi-jurisdictional planning for that trail. The goal of the Westside Trail Master Plan is to recommend a comprehensive strategy for the completion of a 25-mile north-south trail from Forest Park to the Tualatin River.Project objectives include engaging project stakeholders,identifying a final trail alignment, and producing construction cost estimates. The master plan provides direction as local and regional partners embark on efforts to fund,design and build the trail. The project started in January 2012,and its $334,000 budget comes from a Regional Flexible Funds grant from Metro,and matching funds provided by the City of Tigard and Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (THPRD).A Stakeholder Advisory Committee made up of 14 members representing neighborhood groups and local agency staff met six times to review project deliverables and give feedback to staff. The trail has garnered strong support from project partners including the cities of King City,Tualatin,Tigard, and Portland;Multnomah and Washington Counties;Bonneville Power Administration and Portland General Electric;THPRD;and Metro. Public input and the participation of local community organizations has been a strong influence on refining and adapting the trail alignments and options illustrated in the master plan.The project team engaged stakeholders and the public at 60 events over the course of 27 months.The project team directly engaged approximately 1,400 people at these events,and also distributed 18,000 postcards and received over 200 completed surveys. The draft Westside Trail Master Plan was available for public comment from February 6 to February 28,2014. From April 8 to April 22 the plan will be presented to local boards and councils for their formal consideration. Metro is seeking a resolution from the Tigard City Council approving the plan. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The council could propose changes to the plan or could elect not to approve the plan. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS The Westside Trail Master Plan will be added to the Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The council was briefed on the Westside Trail Master Plan at its April 15,2014,workshop meeting. ' Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: Approval of the Westside Trail Master Plan has no direct fiscal impact. ' Attachments Resolution Exhibit A to Resolution-Westside Trail Master Plan CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON l ,o p 1J�Q TIGARD CITY COUNCIL I RESOLUTION NO. 14- A- 7 `//2Z//y /i1 rN4 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WESTSIDE TRAIL MASTER PLAN AND ADDING THIS PLAN TO THE TIGARD GREENWAYS TRAIL SYSTEM MASTER PLAN WHEREAS,in 1992,the Metro Council adopted the Metropolitan Greenspaces Master Plan,including the Regional Trails and Greenways Map (amended December 1992,again in July 2002 and most recently in October 2008);and WHEREAS, the 1992 Metropolitan Greenspaces Master Plan and Regional Trails and Greenways Map identified the Powerline Trail as a regionally significant trail connecting the Willamette and Tualatin Rivers and the cities of King City,Tigard,Beaverton,Portland,and parts of Multnomah and Washington Counties; and WHEREAS,the Board of Commissioners of the Tualatin Hills Park&Recreation District changed the name of the Powerline Trail to the Westside Trail;and WHEREAS,in 2006,voters approved the Metro's $227.4 million Natural Areas Bond Measure for the purposes of preserving and protecting natural areas,clean water,and fish and wildlife;and WHEREAS,the Westside Trail Target Area was identified in the measure as one of 27 regional target areas for land acquisition;and WHEREAS,in December 2011,Metro,in coordination with Multnomah and Washington counties,the cities of King City,Tigard,and Portland,and Tualatin Hills Park&Recreation District,retained the firm of Parametrix to lead Westside Trail master planning work;and WHEREAS,the Westside Trail project advisory committee was created in 2012 to advise Metro and the consultant team throughout the master planning work. The committee included staff and citizens from Multnomah and Washington counties,the cities of King City,Tigard,and Portland,Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District,Bonneville Power Administration and Portland General Electric,to advise Metro and the consultant team throughout the master planning work;and WHEREAS,Metro and its partners conducted extensive public involvement during the master planning work in order to identify a trail alignment and trail design that is widely supported by the trail partner jurisdictions and residents throughout the trail study area;and WHEREAS, the Westside Trail Master Plan has been successfully completed and received approval from the project advisory committee;and WHEREAS,approval of the Westside Trail Master Plan document is not a binding land use decision,hence it is important that Tigard adopt the trail alignment into relevant city land use documents;and WHEREAS,Metro's 2006 Natural Areas Bond Measure provided funds to purchase trail easements for the Westside Trail from willing sellers,and approval of this master plan and trail alignment will allow that work to begin in earnest;and RESOLUTION NO. 14- Page 1 WHEREAS, the Westside Trail Master Plan may be considered for approval by King City Council, the Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District Board of Commissioners, the Boards of Commissioners of Multnomah and Washington counties,and other jurisdictions in April 2014;and WHEREAS, Tigard supports adding the Tigard portion of the Westside Trail Master Plan to the Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council hereby approves the Westside Trail Master Plan appended hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2: The Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan will include the Westside Trail Master Plan. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2014. Mayor-City of Tigard AT ST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 14- Page 2 • • • www.oregonmetro.gov MAKING A Exhibit A GREAT PLACE Metro /; r ^mss s � Y� 's i s '(.1;4‘..- ! - f a 4 y Y ♦ 1. - ..rt#(-•(w 4-r • y lair y t `?i�' J} Fit}- I Westside Trail 1 Master Plan Connecting Westside Communities Between the Tualatin and Willamette Rivers March 2014 ABOUT METRO Clean air and clean water do not stop at city limits or county lines.Neither does the need for jobs,a thriving economy,and sustainable transportation and living choices for people and businesses in the region.Voters have asked Metro to help with the challenges and opportunities that affect the 25 cities and three counties in the Portland metropolitan area. A regional approach simply makes sense when it comes to providing services,operating venues and making decisions about how the region grows. Metro works with communities to support a resilient economy,keep nature close by and respond to a changing climate.Together we're making a great place,now and for generations to come. Stay in touch with news,stories and things to do. www.oregonmetro.gov/connect Metro Council President Tom Hughes Metro Councilors Shirley Craddick, District 1 Carlotta Collette, District 2 Craig Dirksen,District 3 Kathryn Harrington, District 4 Sam Chase,District 5 Bob Stacey,District 6 Auditor Suzanne Flynn ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Westside Trail Master Plan project team appreciates the efforts of the stakeholders and area residents who participated in the development of this plan.Their creativity,energy,and commitment were a driving force behind this master planning effort.In addition,the following project stakeholder advisory committee and project team members contributed to the development of this plan. Stakeholder advisory committee Joe Barcott Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District Trails Advisory Committee Joy Chang Washington County Carol Chesarek Forest Park Neighborhood Association Crista Gardiner* Metro Steve Gulgren Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District Lisa Hamilton Citizens Participation Organization No.4 Andrew Holtz Multnomah County Bicycle and Pedestrian Citizen Advisory Committee Katherine McQuillan Multnomah County Barbara Nelson Forest Park Conservancy Jill Nystrom Bonneville Power Administration Kevin O'Donnell Citizens Participation Organization No. 7 Allan Schmidt City of Portland Greg Stout City of Tigard Tina Tippin Portland General Electric Doug Vorwaller Tigard Resident Dick Winn City of King City *Ex officio The project team greatly appreciates Doug Vorwaller's volunteer efforts providing photodocumentation of trail sites,field trips,stakeholder advisory committee meetings,and public open houses. Doug generously permitted the use many of his photographs to illustrate the master plan, including the cover showing Westside Trail Segment 1 and Bull Mountain from the south bank of the Tualatin River. Project team Metro Robert Spurlock Master plan project manager Aaron Brown Research intern Mary Anne Cassin Planning and development manager Heather Coston Communications associate Mark Davison Parks planning and design manager Steven Kurvers Graphics intern Elaine Stewart Natural resource scientist Max Woodbury GIS specialist Parametrix Jim Rapp Project manager Gregg Everhart Lead trail planner Michael Pyszka Trail structures and costing Jenny Bailey Senior advisor Yammie Ho Engineering and costing Michael Harrison Public outreach Sara Morrissey Public outreach Becky Mellinger Technical editor Karen Martinek Graphic designer Joan McGuire Graphic designer TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Project history and context 1 Location 1 Planning zones 1 Project goals and process 5 Chapter 2: Existing conditions 9 Existing plans 9 Environmental conditions 10 Trail development opportunities and challenges 12 Roadway crossings and intersections 14 Utility corridors 14 Chapter 3:Trail corridor analysis 17 Overview 17 Methodology 17 Preferred trail alignments 18 Chapter 4:Trail design framework 51 Overview 51 Trail typology 52 Trail themes 60 Structural and amenity features 61 Trail crossings 66 Special design requirements 68 Chapter 5: Implementation strategy 75 Overview 75 Phasing strategy 76 Implementation actions 80 Utility requirements 84 Property ownership considerations 84 Construction and maintenance authority 85 Funding sources 86 Chapter 6:Wildlife corridor 89 Overview 89 Utility partner standards 90 Trail crossings 93 Invasive plant species 97 Habitat restoration and conservation principles 97 Prairie restoration toolbox 98 Forests and woodlands conservation toolbox 101 Wetlands,streams,and riparian conservation toolbox 101 iii Figures Figure 1 Conceptual view of Segment 1 51 Figure 2 Multiuser trail 55 Figure 3 Multiuser street-edge trail 56 Figure 4 Soft-surface trail 57 Figure 5 Multiuser trail with parallel equestrian trail 58 Figure 6 Shared roadway 59 Figure 7 Environmentally friendly boardwalk design 63 Figure 8 Steel and concrete structure showing anchoring and thematic elements 63 Figure 9 Trail signing 65 Figure 10 AASHTO midblock crossing treatment 67 Figure 11 Conceptual view of Segment 5 75 Figure 12 Prairie grassland vegetation and wildlife 89 Figure 13 Vegetation limitations in BPA and PGE power corridor 90 Figure 14 Habitat patches,screening and mowing in BPA and PGE corridor 100 Tables Table 1 Segment 1: Tualatin River to SW Beef Bend Road 20 Table 2 Segment 2: SW Beef Bend Road to Tigard city limits 22 Table 3 Segment 3:Tigard city limits to SW Barrows Road 24 Table 4 Segments 4.12 to 4.13: Tualatin Hills Nature Park(THNP)to SW Walker Road 30 Table 5 Segment 4.14: SW Walker Road to US 26 32 Table 6 Segment 4.15: US 26 to NW Cornell Road 34 Table 7 Segment 4.16:NW Cornell Road to NW Oak Hills Drive 36 Table 8 Segment 4.17:NW Oak Hills Drive to NW West Union Road 38 Table 9 Segment 4.18.1:NW West Union Road to NW Kaiser Road 40 Table 10 Segment 4.21:NW Skycrest Parkway to county line 44 iv Table 11 Segment 5: County line to NW Skyline Boulevard 46 Table 12 Trail typology 53 Table 13 Portland technical provisions for accessible trails 71 Table 14 THPRD ADA trail development guidelines 72 Table 15: City of Tigard trail slope standards 73 Table 16 Cost estimate details by subsegment 77 Table 17 Trail phasing criteria 79 Table 18 Probable permitting and approval processes 81 Table 19 Wetlands,nonwetland waters,and 100-year floodplain crossings 83 Table 20 Probable trail use permission or acquisition partners 85 Table 21 Trail construction funding sources 87 Table 22 Potential trail enhancement funding sources 88 Table 23 PGE's allowed trees 92 Table 24 PGE's trees to avoid(many are nonnative or invasive) 92 Maps Map 1 Westside Trail planning zone map 3 Map 2 Segment 1: Tualatin River to SW Beef Bend Road 21 Map 3 Segment 2: SW Beef Bend Road to Tigard city limits 23 Map 4 Segment 3: Tigard city limits to SW Barrows Road 25 Map 5 Segments 2 and 3 secondary route 27 Map 6 Segments 4.01 to 4.11: SW Barrows Road to MAX line 29 Map 7 Segments 4.12 and 4.13: MAX line to SW Walker Road 31 Map 8 Segment 4.14: SW Walker Road to US 26 33 Map 9 Segment 4.15: US 26 to NW Cornell Road 35 Map 10 Segment 4.16:NW Cornell Road to NW Oak Hills Drive 37 Map 11 Segment 4.17:NW Oak Hills Drive to NW West Union Road 39 V Map 12 Segment 4.18.1:NW West Union Road to NW Kaiser Road 41 Map 13 Segment 4.18.2: NW Kaiser Road to Rock Creek Trail 43 Map 14 Segment 4.21: NW Skycrest Parkway to NW Redfox Drive 45 Map 15 Segment 5: County line to NW Skyline Boulevard 47 Map 16 Segment 6:NW Skyline Boulevard to US 30 49 Images Image l May 2013 project open house 7 Image 2 Power lines near the Tualatin River 61 Image 3 Viewing platform: Tualatin River NWR. 61 Image 4 Short bridge span 62 Image 5 Wooden bridge across minor stream 62 Image 6 Wooden steps in Forest Park 64 Image 7 Viewing platform in the Tualatin River NWR 65 Image 8 Themed bench in the Tualatin River NWR 66 Image 9 Ki-a-Kuts Bridge over the Tualatin River 95 Image 10 Wildlife friendly highway overpass 95 Image 11 Invasive Himalayan blackberry 97 Image 12 Unrestored prairie habitat in power corridor 98 Image 13 Woodland trail in Forest Park 101 Image 14 Bronson Creek wetlands 102 vi Appendices A Plan Report No. 1, Existing Conditions B Plan Report No.2,Trail Corridor Analysis C Plan Report No.3, Design Framework D Plan Report No.4,Implementation Strategy E Project Plan F Public and Stakeholder Involvement Program G Public Involvement Summary H SAC Roles Responsibilities and Protocols vii K CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Project history and context A continuous parkway corridor spanning from north to south along the west side of our region has long been memorialized in the region's plans. In fact,even the historic 1904 Olmstead Plan for Portland reflects the desire for a west side trail in proposing a continuous north-south parkway along the West Hills in what was at the time the edge of the city. The growth of our region in subsequent decades has pushed the limits of continuous urbanization miles to the west of that original Olmstead parkway. Nonetheless, reflecting the same impulse behind the Olmstead Plan,the 1992 Metropolitan Greenspaces Master Plan identified the opportunity to create an urban regional trail on the west side using electrical power utility corridors in Washington County,initially called the Beaverton Powerline Trail. The availability of the power corridor for trail development opens up the opportunity to establish a 25-mile-long trail,though highly developed urban lands,serving recreational and commuter bicyclists,pedestrians and,in some areas,equestrians.The trail will connect neighborhoods to major west side commercial and employment areas and to schools and open spaces.The major parks and natural areas connected by the Westside Trail will include the Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge,Tualatin River Greenway,Tualatin Hills Nature Park,Terpenning Recreation Center,Bronson and Rock Creek Greenways, Forest Park,and the Willamette River Greenway,as well as numerous local parks. Today this route is named the Westside Trail.The Westside Trail will establish a regional active transportation link between the Willamette and Tualatin Rivers while enhancing local pedestrian and bicycle connectivity within and between these communities.The development of the trail will also pioneer a new concept for the region's network of bicycle and pedestrian routes-the explicit use of the trail corridor for enhancing and preserving wildlife habitats and movements. Location Located in the western portion of the metropolitan Portland region,the Westside Trail corridor stretches from the Tualatin River on the south to Bethany on the north,and then turns east toward Portland's Forest Park and the Willamette River.The trail corridor crosses urbanized and rural portions of Washington County and Multnomah County and passes though the cities of King City, Tigard, Beaverton,and Portland,as well as the jurisdiction of the Tualatin Hills Park&Recreation District(THPRD).Spanning these urban and rural areas,the study corridor includes lands both inside and outside the regional urban growth boundary,as well as within and outside of incorporated municipalities.A map of the entire study corridor is included (see Map 1). Planning zones The trail corridor consists of 13 planning segments comprising four zones.Trail segment numbering is adapted from a system developed by THPRD.Trail segments either already developed or funded for development by THPRD (primarily Zone B)were not included in the master planning effort.All illustrated trail alignment alternatives are plan level.Recommended alignments and 1 crossings have not been subject to survey,final design or engineering.More information on the assumptions and parameters used in determining and estimating costs for different trail alignments are part of Plan Report No.2,Trail Corridor Analysis (Appendix B).Updates to alignments, assumptions and costs are in Plan Report No.4, Implementation Strategy(Appendix D). Zone A From the Tualatin River to SW Barrows Road,the trail is primarily within a 200-to 225-foot-wide corridor owned or controlled by the Bonneville Power Administration(BPA)and Portland General Electric (PGE).This zone crosses Bull Mountain and includes portions of the city of King City, unincorporated Washington County,and the city of Tigard.This zone includes Segments 1,2 and 3. Zone B From SW Barrows Road (Segment 4.01) north to the TriMet MAX Blue line (Segment 4.11),the Westside Trail is already constructed and operated by THPRD.Segments 4.01,4.04,and 4.07 are under construction in 2013.Segment 4.11 is under design and should be constructed in 2014. Mapping for this zone is included (see Map 6). Zone C From the TriMet MAX line to the Rock Creek Trail the trail is primarily within a 100-foot-wide corridor owned by BPA.The trail follows the street edge of about 1.5 miles of SW 158th Avenue and SW Walker Road through densely developed commercial areas of Beaverton.The trail returns to the power corridor through residential neighborhoods in Beaverton and unincorporated Washington County.Significant portions are within the current jurisdiction of THPRD.This zone includes Segment 4.12 through Segment 4.18.1.Segment 4.18.2 was not included in the study corridor as that segment will be constructed by THPRD in 2014.Mapping is,however,included (see Map 13). Zone D The fourth zone-Segments 4.20 to 6-turns east at the Rock Creek Trail and approximately follows a BPA power line easement across private lands before exiting THPRD jurisdiction and climbing into the West Hills through Multnomah County and entering the city of Portland and Portland's Forest Park.Steep slopes,woodlands,and the absence of suitable power corridors characterize this zone. The trail exits the east side of Forest Park and connects to the US 30 (St.Helens Road).This zone includes two short stretches of developed trail (Segment 4.20 and 4.22) and existing trails through Forest Park (Segment 6).Portions of Segment 4.21 may be built as part of private residential development in 2014. 2 . . . . . . , . .. - .... Segments by Jurisdiction Westside Trail Master Plaid h, , .-:;- -' . ..-• _ ,,,,,- • . •... r all-City of King City iti f . .4./3-Ci rd . . . 1 4 Tualatin Hills Park . 7 Op &Recreation District .. . , r — — - Zone A— — —r -Zone B - 1 Zone C - — — — — 1 4-THPRD out of district I I I I `., -Multnomah County - ..r r-- I I I -City of Portland —L.... 411...... 4 i I I i I I I I I - 4.13 I I . .4. I ..... .....• 4.16 4.18.1 4.18.21 a,r, I . -• , . .12 _ I -.;•:;-e-.2:, ,,,, # . 7 / 41,...•■•• ' r ./ k '- , t, ..i Tualatin Hills Park L..., f1 2 ,rj 3- --: c- , 4.14 4.15 4.171 -440 lik. Ili,-ezrp,tii,n,Artrict ._' __ics. z-j N Z;'''''' 4.21 , Tigare I , 1 , - _ — , • Zone D A ' /1 F-1 , . . 1 • e 'a -,-,-1-..404 - , 1 kilt 6 ,-. E N D ,-2 ***4.,N, , on `... '''''"""''••"'"'"''''''''''''' 4:14.4fi: . est. i „v.-)r---- -; - e‘ ,,, , 1 Westssde Tra,1 \ r"'.IL.--, J ge ,,,,,ks and neural areas --J M2Ver Plan segments I i ONoll Existing trail alignment ( ) Oly of King City S--2 el L--.,____uaL_ L', I I 1'•••••Proposed trai alignment ir::3 City oi Portland I' ,-- 1 . '' ‘. ".' ((IV 0°000 Ira,under construction 1-1 City et Tigard kr, r7' (:)....) I .v,--z?2,-1,, Lr-• r-,::: ; '.-i 1. :.' „,...Other proposed traals N..,County Boundar.es .....•,----- = ,. ... .., . Project goals and process Goals and objectives The Westside Trail Master Plan recommends a comprehensive strategy for the completion of an uninterrupted south-north regional trail corridor from the Tualatin River to the Willamette River. Specific objectives included: • Engage local jurisdictions,power utilities,property owners,citizens,businesses,and other stakeholders in master plan development. • Collect and summarize baseline information on the existing conditions within the trail corridor and immediately abutting areas. • Analyze specific trail segments within the trail corridor addressing major crossings, midblock crossings,steep slopes,and other opportunities and limitations,to best assure segments can be constructed to regional trail standards. • Recommend a trail design framework. • Recommend tools and policies for habitat and wildlife restoration and conservation improvements. • Develop an implementation and phasing strategy identifying potential barriers such as insufficient capital funds,lack of local jurisdictional authority or commitment to build and manage the trail,and uncertainty of right-of-way acquisition. • Produce a draft master plan document available for jurisdictional,stakeholder,and public review and distribution. • Produce a final master plan guiding Metro and local jurisdictions in the planning,design, permitting,and development of the trail. The Westside Trail Master Plan Project Plan details overarching master plan project goals, objectives and processes (Appendix E). Stakeholder and community engagement Development of the Westside Trail Master Plan was supported by a public involvement program including outreach to affected public and private landowners,potential trail users,neighborhood associations,utilities,jurisdictional partners,and the general public.Appendices F and G include the public involvement plan and a summary of the public involvement efforts conducted for this master plan,respectively.The following public involvement goals were adopted in the Westside Trail's public involvement plan,created at the beginning of the planning process in 2011: • Ensure effective coordination and communication between jurisdictional partners and stakeholders and related projects taking place within the trail corridor. • Engage local jurisdictions,power utilities,neighborhoods,property owners,citizens,bicycle and pedestrian advocates,area nonprofits,businesses,and other stakeholders directly in master plan development. 5 • Guide Metro and jurisdictional partners on future planning,design,permitting,and development of the trail. • Host activities and provide tools that will add value to the project and genuinely engage the community in an open and transparent process. • Keep the public informed with accurate,up-to-date information. • Build trust and a long-term relationship with the community. • Maintain a level of flexibility with the process. Two community open houses were held at each of three major project plan milestones: existing conditions,trail alignment alternatives,and implementation strategy. Postcards were delivered to approximately 18,000 households in advance of each round of project open houses.Open houses were held at Stoller Middle School in the Bethany neighborhood and at Deer Creek Elementary School in King City. • The May 2012 open houses reviewed master plan goals and existing conditions within the study corridor. Public input on concerns and ideas for trail development was recorded. Approximately 167 individuals attended these sessions and/or provided comments. • The November 2012 open houses reviewed the preliminary set of trail alignment alternatives and solicited public comments and suggestions for additional alternatives. Approximately 156 individuals attended or provided comments. • The May 2013 open houses included presentation on the preferred trail route alternatives and reviewed costs,development phasing and implementation actions.Approximately 98 individuals attended or provided comments. Supplementing the community open houses,the project team met with individual stakeholders throughout the planning process,ranging from local jurisdictions to neighborhood associations to individual property owners.Metro hosted a project website providing opportunities for interested parties to participate at their convenience.Website materials included online surveys and"virtual open houses."The project team also conducted extensive outreach in a variety of formats to further solicit public input and feedback,including publications in local newsletters,feature articles in local and regional newspapers,and information published in Metro's GreenScene publication and disseminated through Metro's social media channels. 6 Open House Comments "I really like that it will "We use the trail now "Highway 26 bridge will "Very excited to see become a corridor for (built section under be great for pedestrians trail here! Great for bike nature lovers." power lines)and like it walking to work." commuting." a lot. Can't wait for more!" * lit _ tt 0 -----•§T - . E I r` iti.hil! ft'• ", '• 1 Pi,47 LI :1 1111 , ,i . dalk. 1 •....'47- - - 07:...- '' ■. , , , - , fro,.. 1 .;.-' - : ! ei it Image 1 May 2013 project open house Photo credit:Doug Vorwaller Stakeholder advisory committee The Westside Trail Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) helped to guide the master planning effort.The SAC met six times in the course of the planning effort timed to coincide with the completion of major draft deliverables.The SAC reviewed a full draft master plan at its sixth meeting in late July 2013.SAC membership included representatives from: • Counties (Washington, Multnomah) • THPRD • Municipalities (Portland,Tigard, King City) • Power utilities (BPA,PGE) 7 • Citizen Participation Organizations (CPO) and neighborhood associations (CPO 4, CPO 7, Forest Park Neighborhood Association) • Local nonprofit(Forest Park Conservancy) • Citizen advisory committees (Multnomah County,THPRD,Tigard) • Metro (ex officio representing the Southwest Corridor Plan) The SAC reached consensus-based recommendations at key decision milestones including the public involvement plan;evaluation criteria and measures; preferred trail alignments;trail design recommendations;and implementation.The SAC's role was to: • Advise the project team (Metro and project consultant) on constituency and community concerns and issues. • Assist in public outreach by providing advice and using personal networks to disseminate information. • Serve as a forum to provide information and contacts to help advance the master plan. • Review and evaluate master plan findings and deliverables. • Assist in considering options and alternatives. • Build consensus recommendations as to draft and final master plan recommendations and conclusions. More information on the SAC is included as Appendix H,SAC Roles,Responsibilities,and Protocols. 8 CHAPTER 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS For a complete review of the existing conditions cataloged as part of the Westside Trail Master Plan process see Appendix A, Plan Report No.1, Existing Conditions. Existing plans The development of the Westside Trail is impacted by a wide range of regional and local plans and policies including transportation,parks and natural areas,land use,and other trail plans.Various jurisdictions have adopted policies that may serve as important sources of baseline information or direction for the master plan,such as surface water management and active transportation initiatives. In addition to information in this Existing Conditions chapter,Chapter 6, Implementation Strategy,details the probable implications for trail development in applying some of these plans and policies. Overall,regional and local plans are essentially 100 percent consistent with development of the Westside Trail within the power corridor.The Westside Trail is included in multiple transportation and land use planning documents as a greenway corridor and/or pedestrian and bicycle facility. Local jurisdictional and regional planning and land use documents consistently support the use of the BPA/PGE power corridor as a greenway and/or pedestrian and bicycle facility. Regional plans Metro's 1992 Metropolitan Greenspaces Master Plan,1 2008 Regional Trails and Greenways,2 the current Regional Transportation Plan,3 and THPRD's 2006 Comprehensive Plano all identify and support the Westside Trail.THPRD's Trails Plans (2006) includes the Westside Trail and THPRD has already built several trail sections.THPRD has scheduled additional trail construction projects through 2014.Metro's recently adopted Ice Age Tonquin Trail Master Plan6 also shows connections to the Westside Trail across the Tualatin River. Local plans The City of Portland's Forest Park Natural Resources Management Plan identifies a North Management Unit and a Central Management Unit.A regional multiuser trail would not be allowed to pass through the North Management Unit;therefore,the Westside Trail study corridor was modified to avoid any use of the North Management Unit.The trail corridor passes through the 1 http://Iibrary.oregonmetro.gov/files//doc I0_794_metropolitan_greenspaces_master plan.pdf 2 http://library.oregonmetro.gov/files/trailsgreenways.pdf 3 http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=137 4 http://cdnI.thprd.org/pdfs/documentI8.pdf 5 http://www.thprd.org/pdfs/documentI9.pdf 6 http://www.tualatinoregon.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/advisorycomminees/calevents/14176/iattmp.pdf 9 Central Management Unit which allows multiuser trails. Portland's future Willamette Greenway Trail connects to the Westside Trail on the east side of Forest Park. The Westside Trail is referenced or supported in several other local jurisdiction master plans, including the City of Tigard's Park System Master Plan7and Tigard Greenways Trail System Master Plan;8 and Washington County's North Bethany Subarea Plan.9 Resource protection plans and policies The Westside Trail study corridor passes through or by several natural resource and park areas that have associated resource management plans and/or to which resource protection policies or practices apply.Several segments are in unincorporated county areas.Various county comprehensive plan policies,zoning classifications,and other land use regulations may apply to trail development in these unincorporated areas.More detail can be found in Chapter 6, Implementation Strategy,and in the associated plan report(Appendix D). Environmental conditions The Westside Trail Master Plan proposes a major bridge across the Tualatin River,a smaller bridge across a ravine on Bull Mountain,and crossings of several creeks (Willow Creek, Rock Creek,and Bannister Creek,and other unnamed drainages).Wetland and riparian areas are associated with these systems.Several wetland areas created by prior disturbance of natural surface water drainages by agricultural use or urbanization also will be crossed by the trail. Steep slopes across Bull Mountain,and steep slopes and wooded areas in the West Hills,will challenge trail development. Most of the trail corridor has the potential for habitat restoration or conservation supporting pollinators,mammals,songbirds,and other wildlife.Prairie grassland restoration is highly feasible within many trail segments,particularly those within BPA-and PGE- controlled lands under power lines. Key environmental conditions and impacts are summarized in the following table and in Plan Report No.1,Existing Conditions (see Appendix A). 7 http://www.tigard-or.gov/community/parks/psmp/docs/park_masterjlan.pdf 8 http://www.tigard-or.gov/community/parks/docs/trail_system_masterplan.pdf 9 htt p://www.co.washington.or.us/LUT/Divisions/LongRangePlanning/up load/A-EngOrd739_PRINT_web.pdf 10 Key environmental conditions and impacts Condition Impact Wildlife movement The numerous high speed/high traffic road crossings are significant challenges to wildlife movement. Mammals populate and use the trail study corridor, particularly segments surrounded by and near to rural lands and wooded areas. Crossings used by larger wildlife may represent dangerous collision hazards for trail users and passing motorists. Hazardous materials and slopes There are only very limited and isolated areas within or near to the trail corridor with hazardous material or unstable slope issues.The one major exception is the petroleum cleanup site on the south bank of the Tualatin River near to Segment 1 but outside of the actual study corridor. Steep slopes Steep slopes along Bull Mountain (Segments 2 and 3)and the West Hills (Segments 4.21 and 5)create significant challenges for trail development with respect to providing the most direct trail routes and achieving Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant trail grades. Stormwater runoff Steep slopes may also contribute to special challenges with stormwater runoff and associated erosion and pollutants. Flooding There is flooding potential within the trail corridor, most likely from the Tualatin River(Segment 1). Intermittent winter flooding occurs along Segments 4.20 and 4.21. Stream crossings Permitting and design for crossing the Tualatin River and other named and unnamed creeks and drainages may be challenging and potentially costly. Cultural and archeological There are no documented cultural or archeological resources resources within the study corridor. Viewpoints Steep slopes also represent opportunities for enhancing the trail user experience with the addition of viewpoints and pullouts. Noise Higher speed/high traffic road crossings may generate adverse noise impacts. 11 Trail development opportunities and challenges Existing conditions within the study corridor present a wide range of opportunities and challenges for trail development.These relate to existing development,property ownership and control, physical features,design,permitting and management of the trail,and to habitat restoration and wildlife conservation. Ownership,jurisdiction,and existing development Opportunity Challenge Power corridor—BPA directly Utility requirements—Trail alignments and structures will need to owns most of the south-north avoid both overhead and underground utilities.Trail alignment will power/trail corridor between the be more challenging in parts of the power corridor with multiple Tualatin River and the Rock Creek power lines,existing nonutility development, and/or narrower Trail, excepting property owned by power corridor width. Nike, Inc. PGE controls, by Ownership—The underlying ownership and/or terms of usage for easement,a corridor parallel to all utility easements may complicate trail alignments and increase BPA-owned land between the development costs as a result of land acquisitions.The west-east Tualatin River and SW Barrows power corridor approaching Forest Park is controlled by BPA only Road.This power corridor is a through easement. unique opportunity to extend the User-neighborhood conflict—The Westside Trail will link to nearby trail through highly urbanized parks, natural areas, residences,schools,and businesses; however, areas. these connections may also generate conflicts between trail users Connections to existing trails— and abutting residents and businesses. Multiple jurisdictions will need to Extra-corridor alignments—Adjacent land uses, land ownership, invest in building and maintaining and nearby or intersecting roadway configurations may require portions of the Westside Trail, but consideration of trail alignment options that are outside of the all will benefit from connections to power corridor. the existing trail segments built and maintained by THPRD and Jurisdictional limitations—Several segments are in unincorporated from connecting trails already built county areas. Multnomah and Washington Counties do not and maintained by other local provide parks services. Alternative providers for building and jurisdictions. maintaining these trail sections will have to be identified. 12 Physical features Opportunity Challenge Compelling scenery—The trail Balance natural and built environment needs—Enhancing wildlife corridor has the potential to habitat in segments of the trail corridor will require investments in provide access to interesting views restoration and revised municipal and utility maintenance including the Tualatin River, agreements that meet and balance the needs of trail users, local Willamette River, Bull Mountain, neighborhoods and businesses,and wildlife. and larger landscapes as seen Balance vegetation and utility requirements—Revegetation and from higher elevations and habitat restoration to improve appearance,ppearance, screen neighbors, steeper areas. Natural areas, frame views,and support wildlife must not interfere with smaller stream corridors, parks, overhead or underground utilities. and cemeteries are possible points Steep slopes—Trail alignments and construction across the of interest as well. steeper areas of Bull Mountain and the West Hills may be more Partner to make improvements— complex and expensive than for other segments, requiring Trail crossings and intersections retaining walls,trail meanders, and/or the use of areas outside of are an opportunity to improve trail the power corridor to provide accessible routes. functionality and connectivity and Mode intersections—Trail intersections with roadways, railways to leverage trail and or other transportation modes may generate conflicts between transportation improvements in trails users and the users and infrastructure standards of these partnership with the applicable other modes. local road,transit or parks authority. 13 Roadway crossings and intersections Chapter 3 of this master plan evaluates specific trail alignment options and crossing treatments for major roadways (arterial or collector classification) and the TriMet MAX line. Plan Report No.2, Trail Corridor Analysis (Appendix B),provides additional detail. In addition,fifteen local or neighborhood streets are crossed by the Westside Trail.Specific crossing locations and treatments will be determined based on the applicable local jurisdiction standards.The major transportation routes crossed or followed by the trail are (south to north): SW Beef Bend Road Segments 1 and 2 SW Bull Mountain Road Segment 2 TriMet MAX Blue Line Segment 4.11 SW 158th Avenue Segment 4.12 SW Jenkins Road Segment 4.12 SW Jay Street Segment 4.12 SW Walker Road Segment 4.14 US 26 Segments 4.14 and 4.15 NW Cornell Road Segments 4.15 and 4.16 West Union Road Segments 4.17 and 4.18.1 NW Kaiser Road Segments 4.18.1 and 4.18.2 NW Springville Road Segment 5 NW Skyline Boulevard Segments 5 and 6 US 30 Segment 6 Utility corridors Electrical power corridors Large electrical power transmission towers and poles challenge trail development alignments, particularly where the power corridor narrows to 100 feet and where steep slopes are present. Both the physical placement and size of the structures and utility maintenance requirements can dictate trail routing. Lattice tower and single-pole footing locations are shown on the segment-by- segment maps included in this master plan.There are also aboveground utility buildings and other small structures along the corridor.Such buildings are few in number and should not pose a significant challenge to trail development. The Westside Trail corridor within Washington County is primarily a south-north trending BPA- owned power transmission corridor.A PGE power corridor parallels the BPA corridor between the Tualatin River and SW Barrows Road,including lands within King City and Tigard and unincorporated Washington County.The PGE corridor is primarily secured by easement. Use of the PGE corridor for trail development may be less feasible than with the BPA-owned corridor due to 14 underlying property rights.A separate BPA power corridor crosses Segments 4.20 to Segment 6 including areas within Multnomah County and the Portland.This corridor is secured by easements over private lands. Other utilities Underground natural gas lines and a major petroleum pipeline traverse the study corridor in several locations.Trail alignments and surfaces,as well as habitat restoration,will have to assure continued accessibility to these pipelines for maintenance and replacement purposes.Use permissions from the petroleum pipeline operator(Kinder-Morgan)and natural gas operators may be necessary.The petroleum pipeline in particular is buried at shallow depths,and special considerations may have to be made in trail development to assure the integrity of this line. Just outside of the south end of the study corridor on the south side of the Tualatin River,the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)has a longstanding petroleum fuel spill cleanup underway.This cleanup could influence the siting of any bridge spanning the river and connecting the Westside Trail to the future Ice Age Tonquin and Tualatin Greenway trails. 15 cr) CHAPTER 3: TRAIL CORRIDOR ANALYSIS Overview Working with the SAC,jurisdictional stakeholders,property owners,area residents,and BPA and PGE,an extensive process was undertaken to identify and evaluate trail alignment alternatives. A set of trail segments was identified to organize the trail alignment analysis.The initial set of Westside Trail segments included in the study corridor were identified in late 2011 based on a review of background information,property research,and input from jurisdictional stakeholders. Built trail sections operated by THPRD or planned for development by 2014 (Segments 4.01 to 4.11 and Segment 4.18.2)were not included in the master plan study corridor but maps are included in this master plan report for reference purposes (see Map 6 and Map 13). Two major mid-study adjustments were made to segments. • Two segments leading into the North Management Unit of Portland's Forest Park were eliminated from the study in early 2012,as Portland management policies for this portion of Forest Park do not allow multiuser trails. • Based on discussions with THPRD and Washington County in early 2013,Segments 4.18.3 and 4.19 north of Rock Creek were eliminated from the study corridor.These segments will be developed by THPRD as community-scale trails or as part of North Bethany residential development. Methodology The information developed in Plan Report No. 1,Existing Conditions (Appendix A) provides the essential background and context to the trail corridor analysis.Geographic information system (GIS)and other mapping data developed in the master plan's existing conditions phase,and preliminary property ownership information developed by Metro with the assistance of the project partners (particularly BPA and PGE)were used extensively.Additional technical assistance was provided by THPRD,the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT),TriMet,Washington County, Multnomah County,and the cities of Tigard and Portland. All illustrated trail alignment alternatives are plan level. Recommended alignments and crossings have not been subject to survey,final design, or engineering.More information on the assumptions and parameters used in determining and costing different trail alignments are part of Plan Report No.2,Trail Corridor Analysis (Appendix B).Updates to alignments,assumptions and costs made subsequent to Plan Report No. 2 are included in Plan Report No.4, Implementation Strategy (Appendix D). The key parameters in order of preference guiding the selection of trail alignment alternatives were: • Establish conceptual alignments with longitudinal slopes of 5 percent or less meeting ADA requirements. 17 • Stay within the 100-foot-wide BPA-owned power corridor(except for those portions of Segments 4.21 and 5 for which there is no BPA-owned corridor). • For other segments where 5 percent slopes cannot be achieved within the BPA-owned power corridor,use easement areas under PGE power towers and lines. • If 5 percent slopes still cannot be achieved within the BPA-PGE power corridor,use abutting public open spaces or private vacant lands. • If 5 percent slopes still cannot be achieved within the BPA-PGE power corridor or within abutting public or private lands,or if achieving 5 percent slopes result in extended sections of sharp switchbacks and retaining walls,and/or extensive cut and fill,use an average 8 percent slope standard. • Where multiuser/bicycle-pedestrian options meeting ADA requirements still cannot be achieved,use shared roadway or bike lane solutions for road bicycles combined with pedestrian-only alternatives and/or facilities such as short bridges or steps. Washington County standards for determining the location and features for midblock road crossings were applied to crossings in Washington County.Multnomah County standards for NW Springville Road and City of Portland standards for NW Skyline Boulevard were the basis for those conceptual crossing treatments and costing. Preferred trail alignments Plan Report No. 2,Trail Corridor Analysis (Appendix B) details the processes,technical influences, and opportunities and challenges that yielded one to four multiuser trail alignment alternatives for each Westside Trail segment,as well as other options such as shared roadway facilities,bike lanes, soft-surface trails,and street-edge trails.See Chapter 4 for definitions and details. Plan Report No. 2 also details the underlying assumptions that went into trail alternatives and costing. Based on the information developed in Plan Report No.3,Design Framework(Appendix C) and input from the SAC,public open house,and other public and jurisdictional interactions, modifications were made to some of assumptions and alignment alternatives reported in Plan Report No. 2.These changes are detailed in Plan Report No.4. After a second round of SAC review and the third round of public open houses in May 2013,a set of preferred trail alignment alternatives were selected. Following are mapping and summaries of the key elements of each preferred trail alternative south to north. 18 Table 1 Segment 1:Tualatin River to SW Beef Bend Road 1A Tualatin River crossing Design:three-span bridge with approach Bridge crosses the Tualatin River west of the power ramp under 5%grade, steel/concrete corridor; north approach ramp to be built within power construction, 18'-wide bridge deck corridor; north ramp on piers to avoid impeding Use: pedestrians, bicycles, equestrians floodwaters; connects to other trails and wildlife refuge Jurisdiction: City of King City, City of on south side of river and to Segment 1 and King City Tualatin Length: 330' long bridge plus 200' long Community Park on north side; wildlife habitat features north side ramp are to be included in bridge design. Cost: $3,844,000 Priority: near term 1B Tualatin River crossing to SW Beef Bend Road Design: asphalt, 10'to 12' wide, up to 5% Within power corridor;two parallel trails—one paved grades; soil with gravel, 6' to 8' wide, up to multiuser, one equestrian; relatively flat corridor, no 5%grades. switchbacks required; one wetland crossing requiring Use: pedestrians, bicycles, equestrians boardwalk;trailhead at King City Park; prairie restoration Jurisdiction: City of King City with wetland enhancement and restoration. Length: 0.74 mile Cost: $3,153,000 Priority: near term 20 I tl � r�� — i o Ill ■ y� Parallel equestrian trail '' I &' 16 t,� ,••. .. a:+ a 4._: • :r-.';e: All illustrated alignments t1 46+- 7�! '�� O� subject to change based `c• ' t .�_� {• .: on final design, permitting, �' and engineering. i Table 2 Segment 2:SW Beef Bend Road to Tigard city limits • Jurisdiction:Washington County Alignment responds to steep slopes and cross slopes. Total Length:1.52 miles Short shared roadway road bike sections and parallel p Total Cost:54,653,500 soh-surface trail mitigate for steep slope impacts.See Map 5 for a secondary route around Bull Mountain that avoids steep slopes.Total length excludes shared roadway section. 2A SW Beef Bend Road to SW Coler Way Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,up to 8% Multiuser trail within power corridor;includes midblock grades. crossing of SW Beef Bend Road using flashing beacon Use:pedestrians,bicycles signals and center refuge island;two to three Length:0.16 mile switchbacks;prairie habitat restoration. Cost:$869,000 Priority:medium term 2B SW Cotyer Way to SW Woodhue Street Design:soil with gravel,6'to 8'wide,up to Within power corridor;soh-surface option in steepest 8%grades section of segment;12 switchbacks;prairie habitat Use:pedestrians,mountain bikes restoration. Length:0.38 mile Cost$472,000 Priority:medium term 2C SW Colyer Way Design:shared roadway Existing street paralleling east side of power corridor; Use:road bicycles shared roadway solution for road bicycles;add Length:0.25 mile wayfinding signage;add sharrow pavement markings. Cost:$11,000 Priority:medium term 2D SW Woodhue Street to Tigard City Limits Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,up to 8%. Multiuser trail within power corridor;100'bridge span grades; across ravine;midblock crossing of SW Bull Mountain Use:pedestrians,bicycles Road using flashing beacon signals and center refuge Length:0.98 mile island;trailhead at SW Bull Mountain Road;16 Cost:$3,301,500 switchbacks;possible property acquisition;prairie Priority:medium term habitat restoration with possible woodland conservation and stream restoration at ravine. r Westside Trail Master Plan Map Segment 2l (r-Li feria Rti fu Tigard ctty i+m 1,. r •yr- / i,fr---'R 4 L -0• — µ ,t t - Y N Illy Omits_ - bp4/id0ty between Soft autism •/ 211segments 2&3 •1atpe ssU1in/ ..k .. S^ . mountain Nos - ..w 4. e1 t , • j1 } • ,Z� . r ; .._ .. •—`�'Gry of Tfra�rf`--'.`'` • 1 f1'. 2C5 ormtett tit — oeW Wiw a.r Ing l —Jr-, 2A O - f.'4: t — Westside Trail Recommended Alignment 4'414.0 Mk Itr user ''44dradsnngWlnMde?ref t UN.* WWa+dt -.1.' All illustrated alignments /ice'p�,trines s Towers .� g #"‘„„,Soft surface aneTruk ® w T=.mn F s�..MS P I N subject to change based X Cro&41. • S Perks ono natwit Wen Wiaol wnMUa ' We4terdCfesSintS ❑ Privately awned S o n final design, permitting, "/City hound""` "r and engineering. � Recommended Access Miror SlreelAA Croainga Ptt iM'Mr �/ CMMly luwldtties e\.tI'mwil L6 it" f- i Connector Peths number - - talmj Table 3 Segment 3:Tigard city limits to SW Barrows Road Jurisdiction:City of Tigard Trail alignment responds to steep slopes and cross slopes. Total length:1.26 miles Short shared roadway section for road bikes and soft-surface Total cost:$2,525,000 pedestrian trail through adjacent natural area mitigate for steep slope impacts.See Map 5 for a secondary route • around Bull Mountain that avoids steep slopes.Total length excludes shared roadway section. 3A Tigard city limits to SW Mistletoe Drive Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,5%to Multiuser trail within power corridor;grades primarily less 8%grade than 5%,some intermittent sections up to 8%;three Use:pedestrians,road bikes switchbacks;one local street crossing;prairie habitat length:0.12 mile restoration. Cost:$215,000 Priority:medium term 38 Sunrise Park Existing asphalt multiuser trail on private property connecting to Tigard's Sunrise Park;will require acquisition;0.18 mile length;may require some upgrades to meet design standards;woodland restoration opportunities;near-term priority;not costed or included in total segment length. I 3C Hifnhhe Woods—SW Mistletoe Drive to 5W Creekshlre Drive and SW Ascension Drive Design:soil with gravel,will vary from Within Tigard's Hillshire Woods;soft-surface primarily 5%or yr 4'to 7'wide,up to 8%grades less,some intermittent sections up to 8%;three trail spurs Ib� Use:pedestrians,mountain bikes on north end connect to power corridor,SW Creekshire,and Length:0.55 mile SW Ascension;steps may be required to SW Ascension; Cost:$370,000 woodland habitat conservation. Priority:near term 3D SW Nahcotta to SW Ascension via SW Mistletoe Design:shared roadway Existing street paralleling west side of power corridor; Use:road bikes shared roadway solution for road bicycles;add waytinding Length:0.47 mile signage;add sharrow pavement markings.Also includes Cost:$17,000 designation of a shared roadway route connecting the trail Priority:medium term and SW Nahcotta to the Ascension Trail. 3E SW Catalina to SW Barrows Design.asphalt,10'to 12'wide,up to Multiuser trail within power corridor;grades primarily less 8%grades than 5%,some intermittent sections up to 8%;eight Use pedestrians,bicycles switchbacks;three minor stream crossings with low,short • Length:0.59 mile bridges(final design may reduce number of crossings);three Cost:01,923.000 local street crossings;trailhead at Horizon Blvd.prairie habitat restoration Priority medium term I Westside Trail Master Plan M Segment Tigard city limits to Barrows TO Sunrise Perk N. •a', —.t ,.A OnNretkfor td�a t>4 i:._._.'_\ 36 oat}taens a , . lit ' -. . ... 31 is ■ t ' •r m ` — -- — — - m 3A — // City of Tigard i« ,y ti •'rte u •1- .-.i,,,� L - uann,ar. Nnrth v, ., IC' _ F rte r Pc s i • V M lal w� ' - ... r 1. i _ '1 I I On-street \--_ 3C ." 1 r connection to ' - ,•I - • Ascension Trad i-\',. .-g.iti r r.. I r.. - - \,.:� Soft surface I _ for pedestrian! Cro_ r i A. , ■ mountain bikes _ iL Westeide 1}r 1 Recommended Alignment ��Muni .r ^�E weetslde nee j soh�e 0 Wetlands / /Poeueten.esTowera ` ' All illustrated alignments son �► cu,+p,« ^ian.,"Yail. m Y°ot°, is Ta.lote t..n� a N subject to change based ,^/on-strr_ X Crossings • . Parts and natural areas 10 feet memos • on final design, permitting, d'ow 8116 114 X wetland Cre.by. ❑ a il'i P . ( owned /�/city easinde es ,,,;-%'. ey,��wwmmended Access y( ue Stream Cmssb� • M C_J Poblet.wnatl /.V county Boundaries ^�" and engineering Connector Pees Segments 2 and 3 secondary route:SW Beef Bend Road to SW Barrows Road Not all trail users may want to use the steep sections that cross Bull Mountain along the power corridor.Development on lands newly annexed to Tigard along the west edge of Bull Mountain will eventually provide a secondary route taking users around Bull Mountain.As part of private development,a series of trails and bikeways will be included in the River Terrace subdivision.One subdivision trail,termed the 300-Foot Trail as it approximately follows the 300-foot elevation line, will provide for a multiuser south-north trail connecting SW Beef Bend Road and SW Barrows Road. With the addition of new bike lanes and sidewalks along SW Beef Bend Road and SW Barrows Road, a longer but relatively flat route around Bull Mountain will be available.This secondary route is illustrated on Map 5. 2( WMap Segment estside Trail Master Plan • r„�:,d rtd , :r.,�ro��.� P- -.n — t :,,a. . t• •., • t, , ,.. ''' [c,nPte,y • • e s'r 'III Of x !Viet TWAIN - I I , , ..1r• .g 1 gal Io n:rr H Primary route l f '-- - • i � It ry of Tigr _ ., 11 t1 rant %Wilde Mg liseammentindAtifp,ent x.0,01. • �,-, ,wP.,,,ienri • , /*X/ • .. All illustrated alignments ++'\usanwdo. „oanma.il. m , m ['] r wrs N a N subject to change ge based °Ns*more K Wdel<�Ings j sebrr Pints end nature]areas ',. 10 fey* ,4 r o n final d e s i g n permitting, ^, X wwtrcre ❑ /N./01y loundariaa A. ' and engineering. � Apra* X MNrWar.crsm�. Public*°'"°d / /ce.ure�mari.. �•w.�a.xa_;1+to Mt. Segments 4.01 to 4.11:SW Barrows Road to Tualatin Hills Nature Park(THNP) These segments are already built or are scheduled for construction.Segments 4.01,4.04,and 4.07 were completed by THPRD in 2013.Segment 4.11 is under design with construction probable in 2014. W e s t s i d e Trail Master Plan Map 6 Segment 4.O1 Barron.•. Rd to Tualatin 8l ills NAM P.+rk Id 1- t: r'Fy� it : � 75C* es oR it i`- i ma I i 1- ,- - • - .tltA�U✓f 11 nni. - I rrri . - ,' ... V u• -•.. ^. 1 If v _ I 4` y 7>H _f_ li,rk I L _ _i. ro.r �.�. H I';r is n/ -�.� - 1 ., � �V I I 1 \� i�/! x �d �n �/ .., I d e',/, Q''ABP J a - . i/ ol Y•7o. -,. - 1 .' Hylo nA Bad r rti (h j ! )1(i-- 'S3 - - 4.- c� 9 - l . .` I. fir. /� I Wahl& al!i&eotnmded n■gnnrnt 1 Potential w..ra.twl m. = All illustrated alignments ignment Petential s^♦wa.� °NO,bene�w.era.tea • we . ~was "� : .,- b 01,0�sen�.m 0"wi o .tva. in f] � '�:, i subject to change based 4. 0.%,,d0 a+• X Mid&ted cre.,in. t sme� rams and natural areas •.sae tat mecum l, , 7. on final design, permitting, g, �r x ac El awned n✓cargo and engineering, Ieea Access X inner Strom Croons' 8011 P.M*mwnsa ^oe w.dr&mandolin .'..•w.lw.. • NO easooldor Piths Table 4 Segments 0.12 to 4.13:Tualatin Hills Nature Park(THNP)to SW Walker Road 4.12 THNP to SW Walker Road Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,plus 3'to 5'wide buffer from street Use:pedestrians,bicycles Jurisdiction:Washington County Length:0.82 mile Cost:01,355,000 Priority:long term Replace existing sidewalk along east side of SW 158th Avenue with a street-edge trail;property acquisition will be required;existing landscaping will have to be removed and replacement may be required. 4.13 SW Walker Road:158th to Power Corridor Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,plus 3'to S'wide buffer from street Use:pedestrians,bicycles Jurisdiction:Washington County length:0.48 mile Cost:$794,000 Priority:medium term Replace existing sidewalk along south side of SW Walker Road with a street-edge trail;crosses to north side at SW 150th Avenue:property acquisition will be required; planned widening to SW Walker Road may build this section. ;.mot. Westsi Map 7 Segment 4.12 & 4.13 \ At ., sp..,4 . , ,,ir de Trail Y_ Segment 4.11 under y design by THPRD % - _� } tr - - t� 't i. • - i j Segment 4 12 �� / r • Private trail ✓� �_l�- --_tl . . � a a i 'Segment 4 12 go Private trail -.. . .. . ';1.,):!?:-.;{!..._._if 1 Private trail r` \ < 14. ,_ _, t tit\k ' , Segment 414 • Westside Trail Recommended Alignment M.ho Region We `gia Multi-user ^.0 Existing Westside Trail ! Sohnols 0 Wetlands ,"*„/Powerlinen a Tower. All a s A I I i l l u s t r a t e d alignments subject to change based A V Soft,rtaoe ,d Other Trails m Veewpho"ts Taxlots Streams ^/On-street X Mid block Crossings • T a i l a es Parks and natural areas 10 toot rontosra on f i n a l design, permitting, 014„,,Bridge X Wetland Crossings 0 Potential Pram' Privately owned /`'/City Boundaries and engineering. Restorations Recommended Access Minor Stream Crossings Publirly owned ^.."County Boundaries 'ti w'•,is�n.s, ^../Connector Paths Table 5 Segment 4.14:SW Walker Road to US 26 Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,up to 5% Multouser trail within power corridor;if US 26 bridge grades. precedes Segment 4.14,short multiuser trail section Use:pedestrians,bicycles connecting bridge ramp to Greenbrier Parkway Jurisdiction:THPRD needed;includes trailhead near Pioneer Park;two Length:0.90 mile switchbacks;one minor stream crossing;all prairie =r Cost:$2,320,000 habitat restoration Priority:medium term Westside Trail Master Plan Map Segment 4.14 Walker Rd to Sunset Highwa II a.. q"ss : + - , ' .x nS•ne v 4,j +egfr•!..440* - . .t 4 y� y e �y `., P ` , .. r _ soft a • .. ,_ ar e 1 ` = - t - Ysem to Tel 'a _1, � 44.- • Ar. \`•. T• 48th Ave a .D 1�� _ e jr ' t 1 \` c a‘- ' .t. oo' 6. . +*{fir a _ ,a.;' -- -_.a -- - - rf .� _. _ /�ir ke .1.:' a - _ -- - -- +... �.-- �• y Km� Segment 4 14� — I - i� •1 i L .r> 1- ♦l I et • i T PFD B tla i 'Q. i. it.. l ,w I + t. Westside Trail Recommended Alignment Metre Region ^i Mwti-user i ,Existing Westside Trail j Scheel. - wetlands /�/Powerrna}&T ers ,A...„,.....] All illustrated alignments Potential ^�Soft sir+are ��other TraOs m �ewPe nts Taxless streams rid:, i subject to change based ^••On-street Midblock Crossings Potem�al Parks and natural areas 10 feet contours X as � Trailheads on final design, permitting, ./.Bricge X wetland Crossings 0 Potential Prairie Privately owned %�.,/Coy Boundaries Resmratens and engineering. Recommended Access X Minor Stream Crossings _'_. Publicly owned .^/County Boundaries ^.wenueaxa�i _. ^..Connector Paths `------ - `" Table 6 Segment 4.15:US 26 to NW Cornell Road 4.15A US 26 crossing Design:two-span bridge;switchback north Bridge crosses US 26 at slight angle within the power approach ramp;straight south approach corridor;north side power pole relocations probably ramp;both ramps 5%grade;concrete/steel necessary;north ramp on piers to mitigate wetland construction,18'wide Use pedestrians,bicycles impacts;north ramp switchbacks may be needed to Jurisdictions ODOT,THPRD avoid conflict with industrial service roadway;wildlife Length:230'-long bridge;175'-long north habitat features to be included on the bridge. ramp;340'-long south ramp Cost:$5,430,000 Priority:near term 4.1SB US 26 to NW Cornell Road Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,up to 5% Multiuser trail within power corridor;relatively flat,no grades switchbacks required;trailhead on south side of NW Use:pedestrians,bicycles Cornell;midblock crossing of Cornell with signal and Jurisdiction:THPRD refuge island;prairie restoration for balance. Length:0.20 mile Cost:$1,701,500 Priority:near term 34 IIYS si de Trairiklas er Plan r�apg 5egment4. .,... `¢.+.i::. �-®,... .x S+.iri>et Ht{;itway 10 NW C9i �1. 1. • i .. f , -- _. v X� US 26 Bridge j • d°% Segment 4.15E --':. - -• _. ,� tr• ti • � // Sunset High School 0. A -- [ectsiVe Tai,Rerommencen A.lg rnent ---- -- -_ .N.,,, g,„ ,r,, j ,a vwe.ew ,Powerlinesa To..R All illustrated alignments 1.---.,..„...s�rr�.r,rP �o �•�. tie r� , ''''',-..•Strewn , � i� subject to change based c� sr.,Nr X M c.1..,1-a•., 0 T PSrke end natural areas`1,.'b met orb.. on final design, permitting, "N/F,.'-FP w c r. ❑ H.r.- ,r� Frrat*awned / /Cer Soonewie. e Q”� `ue .. .� and engineering. cuI Iy ewm" "! tiMYwN1d •Surrn .A -■ Table 7 Segment 4.16:NW Cornell Road to NW Oak Hills Drive Design:asphalt,10"to 12'wide,up to 5% Multiuser trail within power corridor;passes west side grades of Union Cemetery and crosses Hunters Woods open Use:pedestrians,bicycles space;seven switchbacks south of NW Hunters Drive, Jurisdiction:THPRD two wetland/minor stream crossings requiring Length:0.41 mile boardwalks and short,low elevation bridges;prairie Cost$1,318,000 restoration with wetland enhancement and restoration Priority:medium term at wetland crossings. xr Westside Trail Master Plan Map10 Segment 4.16 AIMMMEIMINMEMIMOMIL r:r>'r.nil" rc o 'hula'Ur , I. 1,, , ., Ilk. • = ! • ' II +is t1 Oh •., 4 • . 410 $ Ir': '7-.71 ■. • t� , h. 1 A kti 7145:.. '.'•::::,4,...:., ,,i, , . iwoomill t, Westside TralReoa nur■nd.JAlignment , 1%..rn,.nH.er ".....F∎Kr■ngNMatwd.yie0 l srrmb Ea mare. /k/ sraw.er5 -,• • All illustrated alignments ,Ny,sorfaa4ia e9 other Try ® r] „m.te -- "' ' ,•',. subject to change based "40or-sta.r X 44 hi„rkCre■ins. • Parks and natural areas'`_.m feet Iataen M . ' on final design, permitting 1�4 ge X W n C r. rgs in PrivaIeiv ewree /\/tayeet rear■ez and engineering. + ACtYB X WM. em Crn s si rgr i.___:„+ ron y.an.a ✓Low*,Boy rearms 'ti !Car.raGN Patke Table 8 Segment 4.17:NW Oak Hills Drive to NW West Union Road Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,up to 5% grades Use:pedestrians,bicycles Jurisdiction:THPRD Length:0.49 mile Cost:5881,000 Priority:long term Multiuser trail within power corridor;existing private trail does not meet Westside Trail width or grade standards;8 switchbacks at south end of segment required to maintain 5%grades;connections to private trail network in neighborhood subject to homeowners association consent;all prairie habitat restoration. 38 gh Vests * r a i l Master P I Map 11 Segment 4.17 . (), dills.0, to vv(-..t 1 twm 1 Oak Hills Elementary School t� ' • Ock Hrl)s Nc gl'borhood Existing"rte ►e _• r,, 1., - is too narrow . . and sheep x _ „nk rili_ Segment 4 1 � •— �_ Om,rn'pale ■ 1tYlfIi1*el PfId (]AIgar ef11 1 -°, All illustrated alignments �1r►�' P� �,. w , r,�,7, i 1 su,eob w.'„�f /k/PiTewers `�: g sns�,face -�,o,r..,,, ”°°" subject to change based err (il *wawne balm "` •sue" Q.; 1, g 0%0 On-strm.t X M:L.i,ck cros.sira • T i ' Pamirs sod natural areas'",._.7o loot=News :q t on final design, permitting, 4.4111.,,,cv n w l,ccros,s,Fs ❑ a ,n•si';.,`'' er , w''Pd "/CltrEowwerks ' .. �gj and engineering. X see' uM c rs „� "we County thenmw war�xn.n I, Table 9 Segment 4.18.1:NW West Union Road to NW Kaiser Road Design:asphalt,10'to 12'wide,up to 5% Multiuser trail within power corridor;relatwefy flat,two grades wide switchbacks near NW Kaiser needed to maintain Use:pedestrians,bicycles 5%grades;midblock crossings at West Union Road and Jurisdiction:THPRD NW Kaiser with flashing beacons and center refuge Length:0.27 mile islands;prairie habitat restoration Cost$1,600,000 Priority:medium term JI /40 m. Map 1.2W.-.:::.-- egment 4.18.1 estside Trail Master Plan . .. . . West un ,nRdtoK<<..: Nrt c w , AM • s iii 4- . , 'r. .. z eeVes t s i de rri X. —a�_.T.- _____ Lweor Park —^_ ti- _ _:3. We=tc t r f - . Segment 4 18 1 . - �� • d + jj w j, . r ti .17 Wool&UN iblegliMMe ntied A gnite* �M,,;pNw.1 r-vv tt Schools ® �, i , ,-� ..' t All illustrated alignments• ','�aa set swim rRV Oawbaaa ® U TiWh r•�.,.,Straws _ -'�1.. r,, N subject to change based "....O■tirw X waaxk t+ • Parks sad natural areas^�.m fool mMowa �-��1 1 on final design, permitting,' ON..s,1aga X Wetland c.aa D yam;&'• �h awed ed /./car eo,ad.ta ..1. 'i 10J i' }� �_ _� and engineering. Rec.naaardad Atom X Mom wren cry ' ^/Gawla 6and.w .. Commdm..Padr +r Segment 4.18.2:NW Kaiser Road to Kaiser Woods Park THPNH will construct this multiuser trail in 2015(see Map 13). ' Westsidejjrail Master Plan Map 13 Segment 4.18.2 ', i Kaiser Rd to Kaiser Ridge Natur°t "_ea I . r I r ,r ;; i :-.1. F 1A a b _ •, L , Segment 4 1 e Y., , • . , -.0 ' .i -., .t-.4. ..t'L.. . •' , IF: . ' ' `. ,7� sr �'' d c x t - + z a ,.K1 ,r ~skis Trail Recommended Ail nmene !rte 1"4/16111 All i I T u s t r a t e d alignments ��0 Moft-ow �/Existing Westskie Trail j Schools 10 Wetlands /k/PowedNas&Towers 'O�/Safi surface �,r Other hails m au e14.• w is _ Taxlots Streams . . "'-' subject to change based On-street X Midbbrk Crossings • T typo Park and natural areas t0 fool Contours - ' w t _ r on final design, permitting F" \00 Indite X Wetland Crossings aenhal PraiNS Privately owned "„,/CM/Sounderlea f�-.-' ga ❑ Resforatians and engineering. Recommended Access )( Mirror Stream Crossings LD Publicly Owed ^/CcumP BoundvM 'ti~awe AM 7Tii I�Connector Paths — Table 10 Segment 4.21:NW Skycrest Parkway to county line Design:asphalt,10'to 12' Multiuser trail follows power transmission lines crossing private wide,up to 8%,grades property;acquisition will be required;9 switchbacks required to Use:pedestrians,bicycles maintain 8%grades,grades may exceed 8%for intermittent sections;1 Jurisdiction:THPRO minor stream crossing with nearby wetlands;otherwise all prairie Length:0.55 mile habitat restoration. Cost:$1,015,000 Priority:medium term The east end of Segment 4.21 is being constructed as part of a planned residential subdivision and is not included in the cost estimate.Map 14 shows the built trail section(Segment 4.221 that takes the system to the county line.These two built/under construction sections are not included in the overall segment length. Newly emerging residential development plans west of this area may result in other trail sections in Segment 4.21 being privately constructed. i IVestside Trail Master Plan Map 14 Segment 4.21 Sleycrest Phwy to Multnomah Co. line. Tr& Vb Trail right of way - ", _;• dedicated in 2013— ra�gaws, '! s - trail under construction yam. a ! _ 11 g4. - 1■ t., Bethany t� to -- 9 i Meodows � Terrace r ^ i- 7'- t. H ant F Segment 421 t,? On D "" i t - r . r y New subdivisions m r t • construct trait sections t. Westeide Troll Recommended Aiignme nt w �ns� Metro Begion All illustrated alignments /- ,MLitt user .0/ ...rsisting Westslde Trail r: Schaots 417 Wsalanpy A�pnwerhres&Towers b .0 Son surface — •�other Trails fit ,nee w p p;irts -—i Tetnt, ' , streams subject to change based 4 71 /N,... Or street X Mid block Cmssicgs • Pot ial Parks and natural areaa _ iC that Tranreerf Zs wagon on final design, permitting, ^r i,r¢ge . Weuard Crnssirgs ❑ rnteriml rrame Privately awn.O /�/r City eountg1 and engineering.• Re,thrat�hr, j �y�� ^ Rer mendetl Acre.. Miror Stream Crossirgs ..;( `,kat ..**d / \/Cni.rty 8oundartgs �'e"•' e.L:.. \/Cnnne.tor Paths mgI■migna■gg.. rg� Table 11 Segment 5:County line to NW Skyline Boulevard Total Trail Length:2.11 miles Split-mode alignments mitigate for steep slopes and conserve Total Cost:56,013,000 woodland habitat Multiuser trail for part of route;a narrower soft- surface trail for other users is routed through woodlands;shared roadway sections accommodate road bicycles. 5A County line to NW Springville Road(multluser pathway section) Design:asphalt,10'to 12' Multiuser trail;includes five switchbacks;low retaining walls;cost of wide,up to 8%grades. intersection with NW Springville includes a flashing beacon and no Use:pedestrians,bicycles refuge island;final crossing design is subject to County warrant study Length:0.94 mile at the time of construction;prairie habitat restoration and woodland Cost:52,214,500 conservation. Priority:medium term SB NW Springville Road to NW Saltzman Road(shared roadway section) Design:shared roadway Add 4'-wide shoulders on both sides of NW Springville and NW Skyline Use:road bicycles Blvd;add wayfinding srgnage;retaining walls required for . Length:1.27 miles approximately 25%of length;possible need for improved stormwater Cost:52,384,000 conveyance and treatment;possible ROW acquisition. Priority:long term SC NW Springville Road to NW Saltzman Road(soft-surface section) Design:soil with gravel,6'to Five minor stream crossings;woodland habitat conservation, 8'wide,up to 5%grades alignment subject to final design. Use:pedestrians,mountain bikes,equestrians Length:1.17 miles Cost:5916,000 Priority:medium term SD NW Saltzman Road(shared roadway section) Design:shared roadway Shared roadway solution connecting soft-surface trail(SC)to shared Use:pedestrians,mountain roadway section 1581 at entry to Forest Park;add wayfinding signage; bikes,equestrians add sharrow pavement markings;potential sidewalk improvements Length:0.20 mile (not costed);midblock crossing of NW Skyline includes a flashing Cost 5498,500 beacon and no refuge island,final crossing design rs subject to City Priority:medium term j determination at the time of construction. 1 .mu Map 15 egment Westside Trail Master Plan ._. , ... ...._______ i ... ,..„ ._ .-' e.:7 - -,. .,k.. '' • .• •,,,,■•, ........••g..!,,. i.:,' . • • •,-,•• ',.: :'••I.,.. ,,.•a,i: ''," '.fr,. •• 0- ..',,• -••- ,'. 1, '`....i„R•• '•- ... : •,:..',-. •,•,• •,......i,„0,-,)0'.ce''''*.•:''''••':.-IA.,'",' '.:41ri.kir'. _ - . -,..•..k.::„.:....'.- ,..,•;....i. -,:-.., .-.t.:....'',.:-'.• xl- ,..,%41 ,;-'; '',..-.••-- ...',•::'•''r': ...-..';',:-1; ..•;'"r•Irit ,' vb,. t,'. •. 4'f ... i .,i',,,,,..,......, 4-f 740'....;r4-....5.......:44r. . . `Z Ae!7 4.-r; ..4 4•X' —•• ' = ; 4.%:.• .= .%::-.4f0,•---. -,..---;-:•-•" • - -•., . -1,.,'.',.,z - 4 C.) ,„.,,,,,...„ ,• ., „. •-.::„.,,,----,- - ..,. -. -- b . • • -. .--...„.--, --, . -- • • :.• • • ' , .4., ./ * - .,..-,, --- i -.7,.....2,-. :-- .. -• _.• !-,..-7.,mt,..1.-• .,........., ..... .. . . . 44, • 1••••:'ora',.••-:-41 ..- :•,-,kw/F- - , 4 , ,. • . 74 .•- •-•-:'•-- ••f s•>.,..;:i-... ,1--:::•-,::.:;•.f:'-_-.;. ift _ _ ________z .. On-street for -...#-11, -_:;,,,e, k-:"....,::...:;,..;,.."...:-...?.. road bikes 7.-t :7'. . . ,,..,4.4. . •„., — ---- -" ..., -,,,:,,:.- • ••••,:".• ,-::-..a ,.;,.....„,, .,„ . ... . ... , a ' ---'•.--. .* i.e• • ., - 4----,. .---.. '•-',. ' • .,--,- T'* >—, ---'-71--- - -7.t,----.t,,, ,., •••' ' e'fr.i.'0:i V. . • A - Conceptual alignment ,, 'l,:''kW 4: *y *...",.-:.1 :',.. &'. . ' - !?B . .•.r"• • subject to final design :-,- ',•• -v.:- .. -.•:.'..'''''''''' ,.......• , . li,■"' assuming public agency '. 0;.; .., ',; ,;:77'-r-: . ' ,,t ;,.-.1. acguistion ot tiait route. (D 0 . .•. - - ....,-.- 4.. orourthin Wes • " - - . • ,- ).5 - -■6,7:7-trii 0 0 0 0-:=4",41.e., .: • . '...'' Pitt 0 0 0 . _ ... - ".• ..—: .. • .. • . ......• ,.___ . . _ 0 ----:.---. • x - on 6 '6' 00 .00 o • , ., ., . 1.-,..-.;.. , - i...• -1-ths,„Dr '''' (-- 11,-.:•':' .. il.,- ..". 40 0 2.:tr:":! • ,..,..,.,::-. ,4-- ,.,,.. 4,-,.. ./.....••c.:.1 . - f.• -..•,_ •'.•`itt....,. , .,' i, i-, r*S----.:„,:-• ' ,,, ,;.i',:, . -., ,::-.--15--C)„...„:7•:.. 14- A4 ;.',„--• --"..........,-..., •-:.,4,. .--T.:•.---. ..-..:.-• .- ---- Gre,„.00,D,!1 .- ,:t..:.=-:.•,''••--....„--•,! : -'''-e:-',=.' ."--':-`-'•-"!.5' ettioopluel ilignmeRW and -:II , ;, , ,• • lrojillitt , it Crossings subject to fing design assuming public i 0 l . ... x vi , s - • , ... . ..,...- .. :,.,„ ,. Ftha - 0 : '. - •."...1.-.1., 'it 5-'1' -"r-'' ' ' >- .-,. f71 agency acguistion of trail , - '-• ' ::' .., .--e7. ..- route .• , -;1,-1-..-_•,.-. • •,;..-:,•_ ' ;P:,...,..' .. :. . '2..'" ;".. . . 1• -., - Westside Trail Recommended Alignment '' . " I 'C'.- All illustrated alignments • M,II,-,ser •'\...„•Fx,fing We,t,idflIntil I 5:1...,. El Watteres • Soft st rfara --",,, Other Trails 1:0 rdevwzin..1 7.1.0 "It914 •-.': r ,lo'At subject to change based X hiklblsckc • itiVrteill, Parks and nahoral antes•—',..•10 foot attibyrs I‘"4.; .i, .:-,‘ ';':.. on final design, permitting, .,-.:. .....!, .,...,,.„(; • °Nee Re X waland c...ing. 0 °ale.**Pr° .„,._ Myer*owed .",„0"City Boundarte • ,i.i....;;A:k).• r, - `• • and engineering. •-.....*ameba 7,'„4"-•l"-:•...1 ° . .,,A.1,..... .16. ,..... _Recommended Aston X Minot Stream Crossings ...1-L-,i "'WV b..'" "Se.Candy Bounde red - ,..0 Canathr Paths --. - _ Segment 6:NW Skyline Boulevard to US 30(St.Helens Road) The Segment 6 route from NW Skyline Boulevard through Forest Park to the Lower Saltzman Gate will utilize existing City of Portland trails.From the Lower Saltzman Gate to US 30,a shared roadway solution will be used. 48 IP. ARM, , W Stside Trail Master Ian Map 16 Segment 6 IligrownianissE ,. O 58 / o ( J •boo �� ( � (� • b CD o 7 - (ID 9 — ',__ ,■__._...__7__`-i— i:1_/ j ,,/-- )r ?,h County i '_ ` on County — _ ,i \,;— / I i1 / / � /�j t _�� I'_ Westside Trail Recommended Alignment • Metro Region • Multi-user .. Existing Westside Trail t Schools ....... Wetlands /N/Powerlines s rowers All illustrated alignments A • Son surface Poential °O�Other rrana m ViewPointa raalo,a stream, N subject to change based P°tential ^/on-arrest X Midhlock Crossings • Trailheads Parks and natural areas 100 too,contours on f i n a l design, permitting, 01...Bridge X Wetland Crossings 0 Pos eortaa oPn re Privately owned /\,/City Boundaries and engineering. �`/Recommended Access X Minor Stream Crossings 0 nubsegment _ Publicly owned ^�County Boundaries I'v wens an u. , r Connector Paths umber swats: .. n _ txv® 7. CHAPTER 4: TRAIL DESIGN FRAMEWORK Overview Lengthy multijurisdictional trails such as the Westside Trail face changing opportunities and constraints.Three partner jurisdictions-Tigard, Portland,and THPRD-have trail design standards in place or in development.The region's parks and open space coalition-the Intertwine Alliance- includes these three jurisdictions as members and has initiatives underway to develop unifying design themes and practices that could apply to regional trails. Most other jurisdictions have prior transportation,trail and/or park developments that define local preferences.Design standards should accommodate local jurisdictional preferences and conditions,but should also assure that overall design themes and trail improvements create a uniform sense of place. Different jurisdictions may want segments of the trail to be consistent with local standards and maintenance practices.Trail width,slope treatments,surface materials,and structures may need to vary to accommodate neighboring development,vegetation,drainage,topography,and roadway patterns.Given this complexity and the length of the trail (almost 25 miles),consistency in trail design themes and features is crucial.A consistent design framework provides trail users with certainty and a sense of place with respect to the trail sections they use and experience.A design framework also provides trail developers and operators with a common template creating economies in both construction and maintenance. • A, r, 7 AL • • 4 r ,•, • ,'. /x . J.. J:1' ...- . t mil' • j;�'1 4 �..^. t 1:4.4 ._ Figure 1 Conceptual view of Segment 1 Illustration credit:Gregg Everhart 51 This design framework chapter presents recommended design guidelines for the Westside Trail. The design framework accounts for the wide range of conditions through which the Westside Trail will pass,and the treatments that may be necessary to cross steep slopes,roadways,streams,and rail lines.This chapter is in five sections: • Trail typology establishes the basic standards for designing and building different trail types that are compatible with the varying landscapes along the trail corridor. • Trail themes describes two unifying themes and how these themes will be reflected in trail signage, interpretive facilities,amenities such as benches,and in trail surfaces and structural features such as retaining walls. • Structural and amenity features,such as bridges,boardwalks,signage,lighting and trail furniture,make the route accessible,safe,and pleasant to use.These features support an overall trail design framework that communicates a unified sense of place,appearance,and experience. • Trail crossings include conceptual guidelines for crossings at intersections,midblock,and grade-separated crossings employing bridges. Specific treatments should be determined on a case-by-case basis with full design and engineering. • Special design requirements address power utility requirements and ADA compliance. The design framework for the Westside Trail also addresses three special features of the corridor, one built and two natural. • The Westside Trail corridor is primarily within a transmission-level power corridor, except for the segments entering the West Hills and Forest Park.Power utility requirements for access and vegetation maintenance will greatly influence the alignment and design of the Westside Trail. • The Westside Trail crosses Bull Mountain (Segments 2 and 3)and climbs into the West Hills and Forest Park(Segments 4.20 to 6).The steep slopes and cross slopes and significant natural features in both these areas pose significant challenges with respect to making the trail fully accessible to all potential users.Solutions meeting both habitat conservation and ADA goals are crucial to the success of the Westside Trail. • The Westside Trail will serve as a corridor supporting wildlife as well as human use. Careful consideration of a variety of habitats in trail design and location will enliven the overall trail experience and help sustain urban wildlife populations.The power corridor is a unique opportunity to establish a continuous open space through urbanized areas that is supportive of wildlife.Chapter 5 addresses wildlife corridor development. Trail typology The following design typology recommendations (Table 12)are based on a review and merging of the several jurisdictional guidelines and standards detailed in Plan Reports No.2 and No.4.The recommendations reflect local conditions and jurisdictional preferences combined with an 52 estimated level of Westside Trail use extrapolated from traffic count records for nearby local trails and other regional trails. This design framework chapter and any applicable Metro and Intertwine guidelines should be used to support overall consistency in Westside Trail design and construction.At the time of actual design and engineering of particular trail segments,current standards and updated trail use information should be reviewed.Appropriate changes to the trail typology recommendations in this master plan should be made based on such reviews. Between the Tualatin River and SW Barrows Road,City of Tigard trail standards should be used along with this design framework chapter and design typology.THPRD standards and practices should apply from SW Barrows Road to the Rock Creek Trail.Between the Rock Creek Trail and Forest Park,those segments within THPRD jurisdiction should also reflect THPRD design preferences.Segments 5 and 6 within Multnomah County and City of Portland jurisdiction will use Portland standards and practices. Table 12 Trail typology Trail Jurisdiction Width Surface Longitudinal Cross Notes segment or slope slope section King City 10'-12' Asphalt 0-5% 2% • 4'-to 8'-wide (2'gravel parallel shoulder) equestrian Washington 10'-12' Asphalt 0-8% 1% County Washington 6'-8' Soil with 0-8% 2% County gravel as needed CO Washington 10'-12' Asphalt 0-8% 1% • Includes bridge County across ravine 3A 3B Tigard 10'-12' Asphalt 0-8% 2% Tigard 4'-7' Soil with 0-8% 2% • Rolling grade to gravel as avoid erosion needed and minimize tree impacts 4.12-4.13 THPRD 10'-12' Asphalt 0-5% 1% • Along 158th Ave. and SW Walker Rd. 53 Trail Jurisdiction Width Surface Longitudinal Cross Notes segment or slope slope section 4.14-4.18 THPRD 10'-12' Asphalt 0-5% 2% • All in BPA corridor 4.21 THPRD 10'-12' Asphalt 0-8% 2% • May need some short sections at 10-12% O Multnomah 10'-12' Asphalt 0-8% 2% County OMultnomah 6'-8' Soil with 0-5% 2% County/City gravel as of Portland needed 0 City of 10'-12' Asphalt 0-5% 2% • Partly on-street Portland 54 Multiuser trail Multiuser trails are separated from roads.This trail type is designed to accommodate a full range of users-including recreational and commuter bicyclists,walkers,runners,and users with mobility devices-at high volumes of usage,at accessible grades,and in all seasons. The Westside Trail will primarily utilize 10-to 12-foot-wide multiuser paved trails located within the power corridor and separate from vehicular roadways.Key elements of this primary Westside Trail solution are: • 10-to 12-foot-wide trail surface with 2-foot-wide compacted crushed stone shoulders. • 5 percent or less trail grade • 2 percent maximum cross slope (slope running perpendicular to the trail) • Permeable asphalt surface treatment,though conventional concrete or asphalt treatments may be used. Major exceptions to this preferred treatment are: • Over Bull Mountain (Segments 2 and 3)where,soft-surface and shared roadway options are used to address ADA and power utility access requirements. • Along 158th Avenue and SW Walker Road (Segments 4.12 and 4.13)where a street-edge trail is the preferred alternative. • In the West Hills (Segment 5) where a combination of multiuser trail,shared roadway and soft-surface sections are recommended to meet the needs of all users. Refer to AASHTO's Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities for further guidance on geometric design,especially regarding sight distances and curve radii. • Q t l ` .! • 10'-12' IlluMaeonaalk. Gravel Shoulder Gravel Shoulder Sa...w..., 2' 2' Figure 2 Multiuser trail 55 Multiuser street-edge trail A variation of the multiuser trail is the street-edge trail.Street-edge trails accommodate the same types and volumes of users.They follow the edge of built roadways and are separated by a 3-to 5- foot-wide landscaped buffer.This trail type is used where prior development makes siting of a multiuser trail difficult and/or where high traffic volumes render roadways not suitable for shared roadway or bike lane solutions. Property ownership considerations and existing land uses may limit the feasibility of building multiuser trails within separate corridors. Locating multiuser trails along the edge of road right of way or immediately outside of the right of way may be more feasible.Street-edge solutions should generally not be used where numerous driveways are crossed.For the Westside Trail,street-edge trails will be used along SW 158th Avenue and SW Walker Road in Beaverton. rc5„:„ ( (/./ "ip, Illustration credit Steven Kurven Planted Buffer 3,—s. � a Traffic Lanes Bi-Directional 20'-24' Shared Use Path 1a-lr Figure 3 Multiuser street-edge trail 56 Soft-surface trail Soft-surface trail sections are recommended along the Westside Trail where steep slopes and habitat preservation considerations make multiuser trails difficult to site.The narrower width and unpaved surfaces provide more options in routing and building trails to avoid adverse habitat impacts.This trail type is always associated with a nearby shared roadway solution to accommodate road bikes and to improve accessibility choices. The Westside Trail proposes soft-surface trail sections in conjunction with shared roadway options for road bicycles in Segments 2,3,and 5.These trails are expected to accommodate both pedestrian and mountain bike users and some equestrian use,with road bicycles directed to nearby streets. Westside Trail soft-surface pathways vary between four and eight feet wide,with surface treatments of soil reinforced with compacted gravel to improve trail durability and allow year- round use.The wider(7-to 8-foot) section may be used at intersections with roads and other trails to facilitate maintenance access and reduce congestion. i : ,I 2 • it '''s , , ...stk. _J.- - `. -� i s 1 - _ "------ — \ 1 '..-.0. 1 ''‘..- ''' . ogi_ . "frie. I llustratwn credit3( Steven Kurvers �j •May be accessible e. •,v► , ` to pedestrian only J, -OR- mountain bike,equestrian, and pedestrian V , . ' ilAp;..,✓ 4'-8' i• Soft Surface Trail Figure 4 Soft-surface trail 57 Equestrian trail The equestrian trail uses essentially the same specifications as the soft-surface trail. In areas of high equestrian use where the trail corridor is wide enough,this trail type is designed to parallel the multiuser trail to provide a more suitable surface for horses and avoid conflicts with bicyclists and pedestrians. An equestrian trail paralleling a multiuser pedestrian/bicycle path is planned for the Westside Trail segment immediately north of the Tualatin River(Segment 1).In portions of Bull Mountain (Segments 2 and 3) soft-surface trail sections may be designed to accommodate pedestrians, mountain bicycles,and horses. r - - :•a r " t. ! �, ' Illustration credit. 0 f ,- -, Steven Nurvers 1 lAr, i Equestrian Trail • I*e ,fll6" 4.4 4'-8' 1---I I : Gravel Shoulder Gravel Shoulder 2' 2' I I 1 __ 4 Multiuser Trail Buffer Between Trails 10'-12' 0'-30' Figure 5 Multiuser trail with parallel equestrian trail 58 Shared roadway Shared roadway solutions,through the use of signing and street markings,route bicycle traffic to lower-traffic road surfaces.These lower-volume roads may not have sidewalks.Shared roadways are also used to provide accessible paved surface alternatives for all users in steeply sloped areas and to balance user demands on soft-surface trail sections.The illustration below shows one of many possible variations to shared roadway solutions. Road bicycle traffic over Bull Mountain (Segments 2 and 3)and from the Lower Saltzman Gate to US 30 (Segment 6) will be accommodated by short shared roadway sections running parallel to trail sections within the power corridor. 4, tn. '!rir , 5- Yr*- .... ' •eS 1"- -1,Sti ti.."3„4- 'fk:,. wA / " -4-2.:-.--..w i, 7.--„...:—... . ii.-.: .:. MEM /Jllf///,�1//r�Ul//O��i i- -, /��////// G4l////1111,U%1�1/V / d %; /4. Parking Parking 7' 7' Sidewalk Shared Lane Shared Lane Sidewalk 15'-8'I 10'-12' 10'-12' I S -8 fr 014 ,4 i.,.......� � go il ...,, . ' -1%.;:r2- _ ...,. kil) 11PP _ :.:....... Illustration credit:Steven Kurvers Figure 6 Shared roadway Sidewalk-bicycle lane/shoulder widening Conventional sidewalk-bike lane combinations or shoulder widening are used along higher-traffic roadways where shared roadway solutions would raise safety concerns and multiuser trail solutions are not feasible.This solution ideally includes sidewalks on both sides of the road and bike lanes designated by striping and signing with the street section. • Recommended solutions around (not over) Bull Mountain (Segments 2 and 3) assume conventional sidewalk-bicycle lane treatments. • In the West Hills,road bicycle traffic will be accommodated on NW Springville Road and on NW Skyline Boulevard with widened asphalt shoulders on both sides of these roadways. Trail themes Two unifying themes are suggested for the Westside Trail:wildlife power and lines.These themes will be reflected in trail signage,interpretive facilities,amenities such as benches,and in trail surfaces and structural features such as retaining walls. Referencing design features and structures already in place,or those proposed for other intersecting regional trails-Ice Age Tonquin Trail, Tualatin River Greenway Trail,Willamette Greenway Trail,and the Rock Creek Trail-and for significant local trail systems connecting to the Westside Trail,will also support a unified trail theme. Design should also reflect the physical amenities and features in the many major parks,greenways and open spaces along the trail-the Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge,King City Park, Tigard's Sunrise Park and Hillshire Woods,Tualatin Hills Nature Park,Pioneer Park, Bronson Creek Greenway, Kaiser Woods Park, Forest Park,and so forth. Wildlife and open spaces The Westside Trail will be a corridor for people and wildlife.The corridor's restored habitat will be a unique south-north linear open space through highly urbanized communities.Wildlife habitat and open space themes can be emphasized in trail signage,benches,interpretive facilities and graphics, and enhancements to the design of prominent structures such as bridges and retaining walls. 60 I Power lines Although power towers and lines are a challenge and constraint to trail development,power infrastructure is also a unifying - - + -•° �� • �:-_ '` ` `� thematic element.The original name of the Westside Trail was the Beaverton Powerline Trail BPA lines are part of the history of a crucial element in the development of the Pacific - Northwest and the metropolitan Portland region-the Columbia _ River hydropower system.Trail designers and builders should Image 2 Power lines near the Tualatin River evaluate ways to reflect this Photo credit:Doug Vorwaller inescapable visual part of the trail experience in amenities such as signage and other improvements. Structural and amenity features The Westside Trail will include a variety of structures and improvements making the route accessible,safe,and pleasant to =i'f use These features can support an r~ a overall trail design framework that communicates a unified sense of place,appearance,and experience.The photograph at ' • right illustrates the simplicity of • making strong thematic statements even with relatively tax utilitarian structures.A viewing platform is on the Tualatin River in Sherwood,Oregon,with animal tracks imprinted in the concrete Image 3 Viewing platform:Tualatin River NWR platform surface. Photo credit:Jim Rapp 61 Major bridges The Westside Trail Master Plan -.4'409r '' 1 xt. . - ‘ f;I,iT , # t. t . ; • includes conceptual specifications t l f =R { , for three major bridge crossings: • the Tualatin River,US 26,and a , •k t ravine on Bull Mountain.The r .b r`: , bridge illustrated opposite is an I •• '''':" s 7--- a ., +„ example of a simple but . �' ; • ■I �. i I' / RA►3 e •.. aesthetically pleasing span as / I '' , r1 • , might be used to cross the ravine. „ .,; . - Other bridge examples are 4 *. ;•,.* G- 44,741r: ' illustrated elsewhere in this M ��k,,e , !4 .'- - ', ' master plan and in associated plan ,r , i reports. - V =a • The master plan identifies key Image 4 Short bridge span Photo credit:Gregg Everhart major bridge structural design and engineering features,but does not detail aesthetic and design enhancements. In designing and constructing these bridges,enhancements should reflect the power line and wildlife themes established along the trail,and accommodate wildlife passage.Solutions that suggest the possibilities for thematic and wildlife-friendly bridge enhancements are illustrated in this master plan under Chapter 5:Wildlife Corridor and in associated plan reports. Minor bridges and boardwalks Several minor streams and wetlands will be crossed by . boardwalks and bridges.The image (opposite) is an example of a small wooden bridge crossing . connecting to a narrower soft- , r surface trail. 'i°',1 ! `?'�` r:` Other materials such as concrete • s ••_, and steel are options where wider - streams or wetlands are crossed, • _ .A-'%`a,•, particularly where the boardwalk - ' ' or bridge connects to multiuser •• • e4 trail sections.THPRD and City of _.•'`"'" Portland standards may be referenced for details on these Image 5 Wooden bridge across minor stream types of structures. Photo credit:Gregg Everhart The following two illustrations show wooden and steel/concrete solutions connecting wider multiuser trail sections. 62 1 Pedestrian railings: a r 42"above the surface - IE ... ' S i 1. Multiuse(bicyclist) \ c% ,1 t✓ �� railings: ) 54"above - 1 the surface \I a 1, Wetland plants and Pile driven t I' t 1 �� wooden piers f 1\r 41 1, ' ; �� y I overall ecological or auger piers I � 1 P � ' , � 1 r function 8t rl to remain mist..Credit: I I Steven Kurvers 10'-12' Clear Figure 7 Environmentally friendly boardwalk design - - — -as — Al NI t 4,„„, Figure 8 Steel and concrete structure showing anchoring and thematic elements Courtesy:Ryan Abbots Steps Steps may be required or desirable in some steeper trail segments to reduce grades and limit the number of switchbacks,particularly when trail sections will primarily serve pedestrian users.Cost estimates in the Westside Trail Master Plan assume concrete stairs with safety railings on one side and a bike wheel gutter on the opposite side to accommodate the walking of bicycles up and down the steps.Along soft-surface or steeper trail sections,wooden crib steps may be the better choice. The City of Portland has developed wooden step treatments for use within natural areas that could apply to all trail segments (see below and Appendix C). Retaining walls The Westside Trail Master Plan assumes concrete retaining walls will be used for multiuser trail switchbacks,ramps,and landings. Large expanses of such walls can be made more visually pleasing and support the trail's thematic elements by using surface designs that reflect the trail's wildlife and habitat or the overhead power line infrastructure.Along soft-surface or narrower trail sections, wood or rock retaining walls may be the better choice.The City of Portland has developed wood retaining wall standards for use within natural areas that could apply to all trail segments (see Appendix C). Trailheads The Westside Trail Master Plan conceptually locates trailhead facilities in Segments 1,2,3,4.14, and 4.15.THPRD has identified a trailhead location in Segment 4.18.2.Additionally,a trailhead should be located in or near Segment 4.21 with final siting based on the opportunities that emerge from the pattern of new residential development starting upon the south side of the preferred trail alignment.Conceptual trailhead locations are based on road access (arterial and collector roadways preferred),accessibility to major trail features (for instance the Tualatin River bridge),and the potential for shared use (for example an existing apartment parking lot in the BPA power corridor near NW Cornell Road). The trailhead could include facilities such as paved or gravel vehicle parking lots; bicycle racks; rest rooms;shelters and picnic areas; information kiosks and signage; and drinking fountains,benches, trash receptacles,pet waste bag dispensers,etc. 64 Viewpoints Several potential viewpoints are !kg- a 344., identified on master plan segment =4 maps. In many areas improvements may simply consist of paved or gravel off-trail , pullouts,benches,and signage. In � _s a� - other areas,such as at the Tualatin River,additional features are possible.The viewing platform ki*- - shown opposite overlooks the river in the nearby Tualatin River I ' National Wildlife Refuge. - Signage Wayfinding signage on the Westside Trail should follow the Image 7 Viewing platform in the Tualatin River NWR Intertwine's Regional Trails Photo credit:Jim Rapp Signage Guidelines.1D Intertwine guidelines will support a consistent look and feel as the Westside Trail moves through multiple jurisdictions. Metro's Signage Manual is also recommended for new and retrofitted educational and interpretive signage.Using Metro's signage guidelines for these types of signs will create a consistent look throughout the trail corridor.Regulatory and warning signs should conform to AASHTO's Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities and coordinate with municipal signage systems. foriev*. ' Carlo( Vall ey _ AF SW Powell Blvd of " Fire 4 • • 1.205 Corridor • _ _ Trail South .4111. ' —— `• ' ,3;1N. "'- 1-205 Corridor Trail North Figure 9 Trail signing Source:Metro Lighting 10 http://theintertwine.org/sites/default/files/file_attachments/Intertwine%20Regional%20Trai1%20Signage%20Guidelines.pdf 65 THPRD has increasingly provided safety and security lighting where trails cross public streets. According to THPRD,this is being done at the request of local road authorities. Lighting may be inappropriate in natural areas,given visual impacts and potential disturbance to wildlife and habitat values. In the wooded West Hills or Tigard's Hillshire Woods,lighting solutions specially adapted for woodland settings may be more applicable. Another consideration to improve the trail user experience is to utilize"dark sky"compatible lighting. Dark sky lighting illuminates trail surfaces while minimizing upward light pollution.This improves vistas of the night sky.See the lighting section under the Chapter 5 for discussion on the impacts of lighting on wildlife. Trail furniture The style of trail furniture already ,sH t - used by THPRD for the extensive "'P .4061'•4"104 areas of the Westside Trail _ *-6 passing through power corridor � r Uri can be used for most of , ��y�► � �� the balance of the trail within the ' � � �+�_, power corridor. Furniture should reflect power corridor or wildlife • - themes whenever possible.The photograph (opposite)shows a ;z K themed trail bench in the Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge, Jj �� ., which is close to the south end of , `,,,w "r.• the Westside Trail.THPRD's Trails ` Y+ s - '� - Plan includes furniture illustration .' ' 3�.:- . • • and specifications. In the wooded Image 8 Themed bench in the Tualatin River NWR West Hills or Tigard's Hillshire Photo credit:Jim Rapp Woods,other trail furniture solutions may be more applicable. For instance,rocks and logs can be used for sitting and resting purposes instead of manufactured benches,which are vulnerable to vandalism and deterioration in wooded areas. Trail crossings The following sections provide design guidance for a variety of roadway and other trail crossings. The guidelines are conceptual.Specific treatments should be determined on a case-by-case basis with full design and engineering. Plan Report Nos. 2 and 4 provide additional detail on the underlying assumptions and variables for recommended treatments. 66 Intersection crossings Where trail crossings at four-way intersections are required,signalized treatments are preferred, particularly for arterial and collector classification roads. Local street intersections will be controlled with four-way stop signs,or with pedestrian activated beacons for more heavily trafficked streets.Appropriate road surface markings and signage indicating shared bicycle and pedestrian use will be installed. The Westside Trail only uses road intersection crossings between Segments 4.11 to 4.13.The trail will follow SW 158th Avenue and SW Walker Road using a street-edge asphalt pathway.This trail section will cross a series of major streets at signalized intersections-SW Jenkins Road,SW Jay Street,and SW Walker Road. Midblock crossings The Westside Trail is primarily within a linear power corridor and crosses numerous I 1 roadways midblock.The usual standard for midblock crossings used for the Westside Trail is the Washington County -walk t• r`_ Pedestrian Mid-block Crossing `l Policy."AASHTO standards — were also referenced. For NW Springville Road and NW NMI Skyline Boulevard the ( 1 recommended crossing `'Taper``"�" X=6 ft.(1.8m)min. treatments were modified in W-Offset Width Y-6 ft.(1.8m)mm. consultation with Multnomah County and the City of Portland. Figure 10 AASHTO midblock crossing treatment Source:AASHTO There are seven arterial or collector roadway midblock crossings along the trail corridor including NW Skyline Boulevard,which is a City of Portland special designation local street. Up to 15 other local or neighborhood streets will also be crossed midblock by the trail.All Westside Trail arterial and collector midblock crossing solutions include a center-lane refuge island,except for the crossing of NW Springville Road and NW Skyline Boulevard where the existing right-of-way width may be insufficient to accommodate an island. The basic recommended typology and estimated costs for each midblock arterial or collector roadway crossing in the Westside Trail corridor are in the preferred trail alternatives tables in Chapter 3 and in Plan Report Nos. 2 and 4. Possible enhancements to midblock crossing to improve wildlife passage are discussed in the Wildlife Corridor chapter of this master plan. 11 http://www.co.washington.or.us/LUT/upload/MidbockCountyPolicy2010.pdf 67 Proposed midblock arterial and collector crossings are: • SW Beef Bend Road Segments 1 and 2 • SW Bull Mountain Rd Segment 2 • NW Cornell Road Segments 4.15 and 4.16 • West Union Road Segments 4.17 and 4.18.1 • NW Kaiser Road Segments 4.18.1 and 4.18.2 • NW Springville Road Segment 5 • NW Skyline Blvd Segments 5 and 6 The primary factor distinguishing Westside Trail collector and arterial midblock crossing solutions is whether a flashing beacon or pedestrian-activated signal is used.Flashing beacons are recommended for collectors.Pedestrian-activated signals are recommended for arterials. Midblock crossing costs for NW Springville Road and NW Skyline Boulevard assume flashing beacons but not refuge islands.This notwithstanding,the City of Portland and Multnomah County will need to conduct warrant studies at the time of construction to determine the appropriate midblock treatment. For local streets or neighborhood route midblock crossings,the standard used is high visibility marked pavement crossings and warning signage. Grade-separated crossings The Westside Trail includes three major grade separated crossings: • Tualatin River • Unnamed ravine in Segment 2 (Bull Mountain) • US 26 All three crossings use bridge solutions.A US 26 undercrossing was also evaluated,but cost and construction complexity were too high. Special design requirements Power utilities BPA and PGE require unimpeded access to power utility infrastructure for maintenance and emergency purposes.This may create significant challenges in developing the Westside Trail in steeper areas such as Bull Mountain (Segments 2 and 3).Although ADA-compliant grades can be achieved for these segments by using extensive trail switchbacks that avoid the actual footprint of power poles and towers,the necessary retaining walls,safety railings,and slope cuts to achieve trail grades of less than 5 or even 8 percent would greatly restrict utility maintenance vehicle access.Soft-surface and split-mode solutions are recommended to avoid utility access conflicts. Trails surfaces if used for maintenance access also need to meet minimum vehicle load-bearing requirements established by both utilities. 68 Access requirements BPA disclaims liability for damage to trail property and facilities or injury to trail users during maintenance,reconstruction,or future construction of BPA facilities within the power corridor. PGE retains the right to enter the power right of way or easement"to erect,maintain,repair, rebuild,operate and patrol the power lines,telecommunication lines,structures and appurtenant signal or communications and all uses directly or indirectly necessary to perform its operations." PGE also requires that"for safety reasons, no impediments may be added to the right of way that impede the ability to traverse the right of way with maintenance vehicles on a 24-hour-per-day 7- day-per-week basis." Like BPA, PGE also disclaims any liability with respect to trail user injury or trail or property damage that might occur during maintenance,reconstruction,or future construction of PGE facilities. Load-bearing requirements BPA requires that paved asphalt trails be constructed to withstand the loading of vehicles with the front axle carrying 8,000 pounds and the rear axles each carrying 32,000 pounds.12 PGE requires that paved asphalt trails be constructed to withstand up to a 60,000-pound vehicle weight. Adequate turning radius for such vehicles must also be accommodated. Accessibility Meeting ADA standards and providing for the accessibility of a wide range of trail users with different abilities should not be a problem in most segments of the Westside Trail.Paved accessible surfaces and longitudinal slopes of 5 percent or less can be achieved with,at most,a limited number of switchbacks. The exceptions include some steep trail sections in Segments 2 and 3 (Bull Mountain) and in Segments 4.21 to 5 approaching and entering the West Hills.In Segments 2 and 3,topography and utility access are the primary challenges. In some parts of Segments 4.21 to 5,topography and woodland habitat conservation are the primary constraints.The combination of ADA grade requirements,power utility maintenance access stipulations,and habitat restoration and conservation goals require alternative solutions to constructing multiuser paved trails with numerous switchbacks. Another approach to ADA compliance involves using nearby developed vehicular streets with sidewalks and/or bicycle lanes.Such streets are in effect"grandfathered." National guidelines state that"the grade of pedestrian access routes within sidewalks is permitted to equal the general grade established for the adjacent street or highway."13 12 View an illustration of an HS20 truck and trailer at http://precast.org/2010/07/h193-truck-loads-vs-hs20-truck-loads/. 13 Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way,July 2011,Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board,http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/nprm.htm 69 • For Bull Mountain,accessibility challenges within or near to the corridor are addressed with soft-surface paths combined with shared roadway solutions on adjacent existing streets.A secondary, flatter route in the West Bull Mountain area using a trail being built by private development is also recommended. • In the West Hills,the combination of a multiuser trail,a soft-surface pedestrian and mountain bicycle trail,and a separate shared roadway bicycle route is proposed. National guidelines The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) published ADA Standards for Transportation Facilities in 2006.These standards are based on 2004 U.S.Access Board Accessibility Guidelines.Together with the 2010 U.S. Department of Justice ADA Standards for Accessible Design,these documents form the basis for compliance with the ADA and the associated Architectural Barriers Act.ODOT suggests consulting AASHTO's Designing Sidewalks and Trails forAccess14 where site conditions preclude compliance with the recommendations for average and maximum grade. U.S.Forest Service guidelines suggest exemptions from ADA requirements that are particularly relevant to the steeper portions of the Westside Trail on Bull Mountain and in the West Hills where trail grades exceeding 8 percent may be necessary to avoid habitat degradation and impeded access to utility infrastructure.The U.S.Forest Service rules state"compliance would cause substantial harm to cultural,historic,religious,or significant natural features or characteristics; substantially alter the nature of the setting or purpose of the facility; require construction methods or materials that are prohibited by federal,state,or local regulations or statutes; or be infeasible due to terrain or the prevailing construction practices."15 Local approaches A central consideration of trail design is that federal funding comes with a requirement for ADA compliance.Some flexibility is possible if local jurisdictions have ADA compliance review processes. Variance processes must be followed to establish that a given design or alignment accommodates accessibility by other means and/or that there are extenuating circumstances.If local jurisdictions use their own funds for trail construction,accessibility and the degree of ADA compliance becomes a matter of local policy.The approaches used by three Westside Trail jurisdictional partners are summarized below. City of Portland The City of Portland's ADA compliance guidelines are approved by the Portland Citizen's Disability Advisory Committee (PCDAC).These guidelines state"public process and PCDAC review helps to determine what type and amount of use is likely and appropriate to each site."16 PCDAC can approve trails that are not accessible or that are very challenging. 14 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environrnent/bicyclejedestrian/publications/sidewalk2/index.cfin,publication FH WA-EP-01-027 15 http://www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/38306?a=250105,Trail Design Guidelines for Portland's Park System,p.7 16 Trail Design Guidelines for Portland's Park System,p.6 70 Portland's trail design guidelines include a table showing three different sets of accessibility criteria.One column in this table-Accessible Trail-provides criteria by which trail slopes,cross slopes and other features can vary from baseline ADA requirements.This column is adapted as Table 13 below.Slopes greater than 5 percent are allowable under certain circumstances,for instance 8.33 percent for a maximum run of 50 feet at which point slopes need to return to lesser grades and/or landings must be provided.This City of Portland standard is based on State of Minnesota guidelines originally derived from the U.S. Forest Service guidelines referenced above. Table 13 Portland technical provisions for accessible trails Surface Firm and stable(Exception*) Maximum running slope 1:20 [5%] (for any distance) 1:12 [8.33%] (for max. 50') 1:10 [10%] (for max. 30') 1:8 [12.5%] (for max. 10') (Exception:1:7114.396]for 5'maximum for open drainage structures or when *applies) Maximum cross slope 1:20 [5%] (Exception:1:10(10%]at the bottom of an open drain where clear tread width is a minimum of 42 inches.) Minimum clear tread width 36" (Exception:32"when *applies) Tread obstacles 2"-high maximum (Exception:3"maximum where running and cross slopes are 1:201596]or less.)(Exception*) Passing space Every 1,000'where clear tread width is less than 60",a minimum 60"X 60"space,or a T-shaped intersection of two walks or corridors with arms and stem extending minimum of 48". (Exception*) Resting intervals 60" minimum length,width at least as wide as the widest portion of the trail segment leading to the resting interval and a max. slope of 1:20 [5%] (Exception*) *The provision may not apply if it cannot be provided,because compliance would cause substantial harm to cultural,historic,religious,or significant natural features or characteristics;substantially alter the nature of the setting or purpose of the facility;require construction methods or materials that are prohibited by Federal,state,or local regulations or statutes;or be infeasible due to terrain or the prevailing construction practices. Adapted from Trail Design Guidelines for Portland's Park System,based on a table in Trail Planning,Design,and Development Guidelines: Shared Use Paved Trails,Natural Surface Trails,Winter-Use Trails,Bikeways by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Trails and Waterways,2006. 71 THPRD THPRD ADA trail development guidelines are included in the THPRD Trails Plan.The THPRD guidelines are based on 1991 U.S. Department of Justice ADA Standards for Accessible Design.These standards were revised in 2010.The THPRD guidelines also reference the U.S.Access Board's Accessibility Guidelines last updated in 2004.The THPRD Trails Plan includes the following table: Table 14 THPRD ADA trail development guidelines Item Recommended treatment Purpose Trail surface Hard surface such as asphalt, concrete, Provides a smooth surface that wood, compacted gravel accommodates wheel chairs Trail gradient Maximum of 5%without landings Greater than 5% is too Maximum of 8.33%with landings strenuous Trail cross slope 2% maximum Provides positive trail drainage, but avoids excessive gravitation to side of trail Trail width 5' minimum Accommodates a wide variety of users Trail amenities, Place no higher than 4' off ground Provides access within reach of phones, drinking wheelchair users fountains, ped-actuated buttons Detectable pavement Place at top of ramp before entering Provides visual cues for visually changes at curb ramp roadways impaired approaches Trailhead signage Accessibility information such as trail Supports user convenience and gradient/profile, distances,tread safety conditions, location of drinking fountains and rest stops Parking Provide at least one accessible parking Supports user convenience and area at each trailhead safety Rest areas On trails specifically designated as Supports user convenience and accessible, provide rest areas/widened safety areas on the trail optimally at every 300' Adapted from Table 2,Trails Plan for the Tualatin Hills Park&Recreation District -- 72 City of Tigard The City of Tigard is another local example for managing trail accessibility.Tigard recommends signage explaining trail features that are not standard for accessible trail,and stipulates that if steeper segments are incorporated into a multiuser trail,that less than 30 percent of the total trail length can exceed 8.33 percent slope.Table 15 summarizes recommended Tigard treatments with respect to differing slopes. Table 15:City of Tigard trail slope standards Longitudinal slope Maximum length Landings 5% max N/A N/A 5-8.5% 200' Every 20' 8.5-10% 30' Every 30' 10-12.5% 10' 10' Source:Tigard Greenways:Trail System Master Plan 73 CHAPTER 5: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Overview The estimated overall cost of constructing the undeveloped sections of the Westside Trail is approximately$36,608,550.Segment-by-segment costs are provided in Chapter 3.Table 16 provides a detailed breakdown of the factors and assumptions embedded in the cost estimates.The pace and pattern of trail development will be driven by funding availability,jurisdictional priorities, and surrounding development,and may take a decade or longer to complete.An overall implementation and phasing plan will assure that the trail will be developed in the most strategically and thematically consistent and cost-effective manner. This implementation strategy chapter will provide the developers and operators of the trail with essential tools and guidance in securing funding and anticipating development challenges.This implementation strategy outlines planning and permitting requirements that may have to be satisfied.This implementation strategy is presented in two major sections: • Phasing strategy applies criteria that address jurisdictional authority,connectivity and functionality,and relative benefit/cost,and recommends near-,mid-and long-term priorities.This section also includes information on possible trail construction funding sources. • Implementation actions summarize the planning and permitting requirements and other permissions that may apply to trail development and management.In addition, jurisdictional authority challenges that will be faced in developing the Westside Trail are discussed. Additional information on the phasing strategy and full details on probable implementation actions can be found in Plan Report No.4, Implementation Strategy(Appendix D). :VA .41:1g1 , WA, . 1 0 • — 's 44105. .11' .fie... .. ti.. � _ .' a .�. -L Figure 11 Conceptual view of Segment 5 Illustration credit:Gregg Everhart 75 Phasing strategy Many factors will influence the actual sequence in which individual Westside Trail sections are built.Property acquisition and construction funding will be two primary drivers.Viable funding opportunities that may emerge as time passes should be pursued irrespective of an overall phasing plan.This notwithstanding,a phasing strategy is important for providing guidance in balancing options and effectively pursuing funding. Phasing criteria and recommendations The following phasing criteria (see Table 17) are suggested for use in arriving at decisions prioritizing the development of individual trail sections.The criteria are not in order of importance nor are they weighted.These criteria should be used as a series of questions to ask when determining priorities.Phasing criteria,and overall phasing plans and rankings,should be regularly revisited as trail sections are built and other circumstances change. Recommendations for the phasing of trail segments and sections are included in the summary tables accompanying the segment maps in Chapter 3.Plan Report No.4 provides a detailed summary of the trail phasing criteria used to arrive at the phasing recommendations. 76 I 1 . i(• .q;;;;;;•,.,...,.f | �, \ \ | | \ its! | 9 ! ; �} 13ffi /q| §d\G \ R | | E , l � /� E \ RQ14 �/ � • | ' | &§§SG`jh0§! )�||�� ! | ! | � . i fii||iiil; it flt higi frii!11 g | | I ` ||`|�'§l�' ||| |||!||' } ; ti ,, ! " / ; ■! t , .| i \ f . wwiat , k\1 \ /I \\ \ , eah- G G »1 iiiI i ;„!E : ! ; i |l \ ||| | § |�' (|( , ; \ ||5 - `,, - 1% ` Il 111 \ I ■ : || ! �. _ . . j !| [ �l . 111 tit§ : ,! ! I ! - s II I ! ■ i | \ . -. . . . \/ j I 1 fli _ -. . . .. ; § ! |ft | 14 ; |i \ .. . . _ I 1 \ ) \ §1\hq ki11/h// g)|1t§ti1n110.01 gE11 ' q\/ /\ /\ |||il|gliM ilii#|)ii .11|/((216 |§(�§11°'il1 i This page intentionally left blank. ]8 Table 17 Trail phasing criteria Criteria Examples Jurisdiction The trail segment or section is within a Segment 3 across Bull Mountain is within the City of jurisdiction that has established authority to Tigard city limits,and Tigard builds, owns and fund, develop,own and/or operate trails. operates trails. In contrast,Segment 2 (also Bull Mountain)is within unincorporated Washington County.The County does not have or exercise a parks authority. Connectivity The trail section or crossing structure has a The Tualatin River Bridge(Segment 1), although at positive impact on regional trail connectivity the south end of the Westside Trail, is essential to of the trail beyond the specific segment in linking into two other regional trails(Tualatin River which it is located or on the Westside Trail as Greenway and Ice Age Tonquin Trail). a whole. The trail section connects to major activity Segment 4.14 connects a major Beaverton corporate center(s)that could generate considerable business park with a city park and considerable local trail use—schools, regional open spaces, business and activities along SW Walker Road. shopping centers, business parks, etc. The trail section extends a built portion of the Segment 4.21 extends and connects built portions of Westside Trail or other intersecting built the Westside Trail (Segments 4.20 and 4.22). trails. The trail section connects to other Improved transportation connectivity will result from transportation facilities—MAX, bus stops, building the short 4.11 segment, linking to the park and rides—making use of such Beaverton Creek MAX station, 153rd bike lanes and transportation and transit options more sidewalks,and SW Jenkins Road transit lines. practical. Functionality Trail section is functional in and of itself. The trail section between SW Beef Bend Road and SW Bull Mountain Road (Segment 2)would provide an off-street alternative for local bicycle and pedestrian traffic where none now exists. Trail section or crossing structure is a crucial Without a US 26 bridge,trail development in the link,without which intersecting Westside Trail north end of Segment 4.14 and all of Segment 4.15 sections would not be functional. would have less functionality. 79 Criteria Examples Benefit/cost The benefits of a given trail section are A paved trail extension from the east end of the distinctly greater than the relative cost, Bethany Terrace Trail (Segment 4.20)sets the stage complexity and/or length of the section. for the more complex extension of the trail system into the West Hills. Alternatives There are no practical or interim alternatives There is no practical off-street alternative to building for one or more classes of trail users without trails through Segment 5 approaching the West Hills constructing a particular trail section or and Forest Park. crossing structure. Implementation actions The Westside Trail will pass through multiple jurisdictions including the cities of King City,Tigard, Beaverton and Portland;Washington and Multnomah Counties;and THPRD.These jurisdictions and the two power utilities that control much of the trail corridor will have to work together to fund,build,and maintain the Westside Trail.The relatively flat Segment 1 at the south end of the study corridor is along King City and includes a major bridge across the Tualatin River estimated to cost almost$4 million. King City has few parks operations resources.The Ice Age Tonquin Trail and Tualatin River Greenway Trail will pass through the City of Tualatin and connect to the Westside Trail across the Tualatin River.Because of this connection,the City of Tualatin could also be a partner in development of the south end of the Westside Trail even though the Westside Trail will not pass through the city limits. The remaining undeveloped Westside Trail segments are,in many respects,the most challenging to complete,regardless of jurisdictional authority.Segments across Bull Mountain (Segment 2)and into the West Hills (Segment 5)are partly within county jurisdictions that do not have parks authority.These same segments involve major crossing structures,steeply sloped trail corridors, and potentially significant private property acquisitions. • Among the more important partnership actions will be ensuring that the Westside Trail Master Plan is adopted into local planning policies,such as comprehensive plans, transportation system plans,and trail system plans. • Determining jurisdictional commitments to build and maintain the Westside Trail is the second crucial implementation action.Metro has regional parks authority.Many of the undeveloped trail segments north of the MAX line and US 26 are within unincorporated Washington County but could be annexed to THPRD.The City of Portland also has a significant trail network in place through Forest Park(Segment 6),and Tigard operates many trails near or on the northwest flank of Bull Mountain (Segment 3). A variety of federal,state and regional regulatory agencies will have important roles in funding and permitting the Westside Trail.Additional coordination activities,permits and approvals to those 80 identified in this master plan may become evident during trail design and engineering. Local neighborhoods,businesses and property owners,and advocacy groups such as bicycling and open space groups will need to be consulted on an ongoing basis. Ongoing formal and informal coordination in advancing trail development within this complex set of jurisdictional authorities and stakeholders is critical.The Westside Trail planning process will only end when the final mile of trail is open for traffic. Permitting and compliance requirements Engineering,permitting and construction requirements may vary greatly across the trail corridor based on the physical particulars of a given section,varying regulations between responsible jurisdictions,and the source of development funding.Table 18 lists the most likely public agency permitting and compliance processes that will impact trail development.More detail on the specific structures,crossings and other features that may need permitting can be found in Plan Report No. 4,Implementation Strategy(Appendix D). Table 18 Probable permitting and approval processes Agency Method Federal Federal Highway Administration • National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) Executive Orders • EO 11988 Floodplain Management Compliance • EO 11990 Protection of Wetlands Compliance • EO 12898 Environmental Justice Compliance National Marine Fisheries Service • Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation • Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Consultation • Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation • Migratory Bird Treaty Act Compliance • Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Coordination U.S.Army Corps of Engineers • Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit State of Oregon State Historic Preservation Office • National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation Department of Environmental Quality • Clean Water Act Section 401:Water Quality Certification • Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Review • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program Construction • Stormwater Discharge Permit 81 Agency Method Department of State Lands • Wetland Delineation Clearance • Removal-Fill Permit or General Authorization Department of Fish and Wildlife • Oregon Fish Passage Law Compliance • Oregon Endangered Species Act Compliance • Habitat Mitigation Policy Department of Transportation • Permit to occupy or perform operations upon state highways Local government and special district jurisdictions Washington County, Multnomah • Land use permits and approvals(conditional use, County, King City,Tigard, Beaverton, development, and/or environmental) Portland • Natural resource overlay zone reviews • Floodplain development permits • Roadway construction permits,ADA variances (in particular the cities of Tigard and Portland) Clean Water Services, Portland • Environmental review,development review,stormwater Bureau of Environmental Services permits Surface water management Trail development crossings near to water bodies,wetlands,and associated riparian areas involve many regulatory considerations.Water bodies and wetlands are particularly important as the incubators of many of the wildlife species that will make the Westside Trail corridor"home." Surface water runoff,particularly from paved trail surfaces,will have to be managed for quantity and potentially for quality.Many local partner jurisdictions and state and federal agencies have policies and regulations that may apply to water bodies and wetlands. The Westside Trail will cross two major stream corridors: • Tualatin River(Segment 1) -A proposed 330-foot trail bridge span will cross the Tualatin River and connect to the Ice Age Tonquin Trail. Probable permitting agencies include,but are not limited to,the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,National Marine Fisheries Service, DEQ, the Oregon Department of State Lands,and Clean Water Services. • Bronson Creek Wetlands (Segment 4.18.2) -This crossing will be constructed by THPRD in 2014.All permitting will be THPRD's responsibility. Other wetlands and water bodies are within the trail corridor.See Plan Report Nos. 1 and 2 for locations and descriptions.Where impacts from trail construction cannot be avoided,mitigation and restoration or enhancement will have to be undertaken.Many local partner jurisdictions and state and federal agencies have policies and regulations that may apply to water bodies and wetlands.See Plan Report Nos.3 and 4 for more information.The wetland and other water features crossed by the trail include those listed in Table 19 below. 82 Table 19 Wetlands, nonwetland waters,and 100-year floodplain crossings Segment Wetlands Streams Floodplains Other 1 X X X Tualatin River 2 X 3 X 4.14 X X 4.15 X X 4.16 X X X 4.21 X X X 5 X Clean Water Services(CWS) is the surface water management and stormwater regulatory authority for urban Washington County.CWS regulates and manages,and,in some cases,owns stream and riparian corridors,including some within or near the Westside Trail corridor.Trail development may trigger CWS requirements to protect and enhance sensitive areas and vegetated corridors during construction. In addition,mitigation and enhancement may be required. CWS Sensitive Areas and Vegetated Corridors17 (Chapter 3 of the Design and Construction Standards) allows pedestrian or bike trail crossings of vegetated corridors.The standards require that trails be designed and constructed to protect water quality and mitigate any impacts to public stormwater systems.Vegetated swales and/or dry basins are required to provide on-site treatment of all stormwater runoff from paved trails. Paths up to 12 feet in width,including any structural embankments,are conditionally allowed. Paths between 12 and 14 feet wide are allowed if constructed using low impact development approaches in accordance with Chapter 4 of the Design and Construction Standards(Runoff Treatment and Control 18). Portland Bureau of Environmental Services is the surface water management authority for the City of Portland.NW Skyline Boulevard,and a short portion of the proposed soft-surface trail within Segment 5,will be subject to City surface water runoff quality and quantity regulations. Multnomah County is responsible for stormwater management for the private lands through which a portion of the proposed Segment 5 soft-surface trail may pass and for the multiuser paved trail proposed to connect Segment 4.21 to NW Springville Road.Multnomah County also has jurisdiction over NW Springville Road.The County's Design and Construction Manual would apply stormwater management standards to the widening of NW Springville Road. 17 http://www.cleanwaterservices.org/Content/Permit/DAndC%20Chapters/Chapter%203%20DC%20Amendment%20RO%2008-28.pdf 18http://www.c leanwatersery ices.org/Content/Permit/DAndC%20Chapters/Chapter%204%20Amendment%20 RO%2007-20_pd f 83 Multnomah County regulates stormwater on private lands through its land use code,Chapter 33 West Hills Rural Plan Area.Any development that constructs more than 500 square feet of impervious surface requires a stormwater review.The soft-surface trail would not fall under this stipulation.Chapter 33 may not apply if pervious asphalt surfaces are used for the multiuser trail. Utility requirements Power utility use permissions The trail corridor in Washington County is within the power transmission corridor that traverses the eastern portion of the county from south to north. PGE's power transmission facilities are primarily secured by easement in Segments 1, 2 and 3. BPA owns the land underlying its power transmission poles and lines for most of the length of the entire south-north corridor.Where BPA owns the underlying corridor,formal use agreements with the utility will be required.The east- west segments of the trail corridor that approach and enter Forest Park are partly within a"branch" BPA power corridor easement.Agreements may be needed with BPA and with the underlying private property owners. Power utility maintenance agreements PGE and BPA follow their usual and customary maintenance practices in all undeveloped trail segments and sections.Maintenance practices suitable for undeveloped power corridors may not however be compatible with development for bicycle and pedestrian traffic,nor with the planned dual function of the trail corridor as a wildlife corridor. Plan Report No.3 details baseline utility standards and limitations. Existing corridor maintenance agreements between the power utilities and THPRD for developed trail segments should provide adequate precedence for future agreements with respect to basic maintenance,but not for practices compatible with wildlife corridors.Chapter 5 proposes wildlife habitat restoration and conservation principles and practices.These principles and practices will have to be translated to agreements between the power utilities and the jurisdictions that maintain and operate different trail segments (including for existing and planned THPRD operated and maintained sections). Property ownership considerations Much of the trail corridor across Bull Mountain (under PGE power lines)and into the West Hills (under BPA power lines),while reserved for power transmission purposes by easements,remains in private ownership. Power utility easements secured across private lands generally permit continued farming and ancillary residential uses provided that power infrastructure maintenance is not impaired.BPA and PGE do not have the right to grant trail development permissions where there is underlying private ownership. Options to acquire rights to privately owned power corridor lands include public access easements and fee title acquisition. 84 Table 20 Probable trail use permission or acquisition partners Segment Utility TriMet Public Road Home Private Developer Authority Owners Owner Association 1 X X X 2 X X X X 3 X X X X 4.12-4.13 X X 4.14 X X 4.15 X X 4.16 X X 4.17 X X 4.18.1 X X 4.21 X X X 5 X X X X Construction and maintenance authority Construction and maintenance agreements will need to be developed with partner jurisdictions, particularly where there is no current parks provider.Agreements may expand the responsibilities of a parks provider,change current maintenance practices,and/or outright assign trail construction or maintenance responsibility outside of usual jurisdictional authority.Two segments within the trail corridor are within county jurisdiction with no parks authority: Segment 2 (Washington County)and Segment 5 (Multnomah County). Of particular importance is establishing agreements for modified maintenance practices for trail corridor habitat.The goals of restoring and conserving habitat for wildlife along the trail corridor will call for different maintenance practices that should cost less to carry out than conventional approaches. Full-service parks providers For trail segments where there are current parks providers and where the providers recognize the Westside Trail in jurisdictional plans,ongoing operation and maintenance agreements may not be required beyond acceptance of jurisdictional responsibility for a trail section.The exception may be for adoption of maintenance practices that establish and sustain wildlife corridor functions. No parks service providers Segments 2 and 5 are in unincorporated county areas. Neither Washington County(Segment 2) nor Multnomah County(Segment 5) is a parks provider.Washington County will partner with neighboring jurisdictions or other park providers to build and maintain Segment 2.The on-street 85 sections of Segment 5 will be built and maintained by Multnomah County and the City of Portland. The off-street sections of Segment 5 will be built and maintained through a partnership between neighboring park providers which could include Metro,THPRD,Portland Parks and Recreation,and Multnomah County. Funding sources While local financial resources (such as the THPRD park bonds or parks and open space system development charges) may fund some trail construction,it is highly likely that federal and state funding will be the most usual and effective source of funding applied to trail construction. Although other local jurisdictions and agencies may play significant roles in funding the construction of the Westside Trail,ODOT may be the largest single provider of funding,either directly or through a variety of"pass-through" programs with local jurisdictions. The information included in the Westside Trail Master Plan with respect to alignments,design typology,and costs will be an essential aid in developing competitive and responsive grant applications to ODOT and other funders.ODOT requires that construction projects utilize a project prospectus as part of a request for project construction funding and development.The current (April 2013) ODOT Project Prospectus forms are included in Plan Report No.4 (Appendix D). Table 21 summarizes some of the major sources of design and construction funding currently available for trails.Other more locally sourced funds may be available.The terms and conditions of these sources will change from time to time,new programs may emerge or others may sunset,and funding cycles and levels of funds available will vary. 86 Table 21 Trail construction funding sources Agency Program Funding Cycle Local Match Range of Funds Available Washington MSTIP 3d—Opportunity Funds 5-year cycle Undetermined $5M Total County (may include bike/ped projects) Metro Metropolitan Transportation 3-year cycle None $94.6M Improvement Program regional Total flexible funds (2016-2018) Metro Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Ongoing Two times $16,6000 Grants grant value to$1M but no set top limit Oregon Statewide Transportation 3-year cycle 10% $1.3B Total Department of Improvement Program—Enhance (Enhance) ($720M Transportation and Fix-it(2015-2018) Fix-It& (ODOT) $227M Enhance) FHWA Recreational Trails Program Annual 20% Varies (administered by the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department) The primary funding source for THPRD trail construction is that agency's current voter-approved bond measure.Although limited to funding extra-capacity improvements to meet the demands generated by new development,transportation and parks system development charges would generally be available to use for regional trail construction.Funding may also be available to underwrite specific elements or types of trail construction or to provide enhancements or mitigation within the trail corridor.This is particularly germane to the Westside Trail's function as a wildlife corridor as well as a trail corridor.Possible funding sources are listed in Table 22. 87 Table 22 Potential trail enhancement funding sources Agency Program Funding Local Match Range of Available Cycle Percentage Funds Metro Restoration & Education Annual 100% Varies Grants Metro Nature in Neighborhoods Annual 200% Minimum of Capital Grants $50,000 Metro Natural Areas Bond Varies Varies Varies Acquisition Funds Metro Regional Travel Options Biannual 10% Minimum of $50,000 Oregon State Parks Measure 66 lottery funds Biannual Varies Varies for parks and trails Oregon State Parks Local Government Grant Annual 20%to 50% $40,000 to$1M Oregon State Parks County Opportunity Annual 25%to 50% $5,000 to$200,000 Grant Program Oregon State Parks Recreational Trails Grants Annual 20% Minimum of$5,000 Oregon State Parks Land and Water Annual 50% Minimum of Conservation Fund $12,500 Oregon Watershed Restoration Grants Annual 25% Varies Enhancement Board Oregon Watershed Small Grants Annual 25% Up to$10,000 Enhancement Board Oregon Community Oregon Historic Trails Annual N/A Up to$40,000 Foundation Fund Oregon Community Oregon Parks Foundation Annual N/A $1,500 to$5,000 Foundation Fund Bikes Belong Bikes Belong Grant Quarterly N/A Up to$10,000 Cycle Oregon Cycle Oregon Signature Annual N/A $50,000 to Grant $100,000 The Trail Keepers The Trail Keepers Annual N/A Up to$3,000 Foundation Foundation Grant 88 CHAPTER 6: WILDLIFE CORRIDOR Overview The Westside Trail will serve as a corridor supporting wildlife as well as bicyclists and pedestrians. Careful consideration of a variety of habitats in trail design and location will enliven the overall trail experience and help sustain urban wildlife populations. In general,the entire power corridor is highly altered from natural conditions as a result of power line maintenance practices,and also due to surrounding urbanization, road crossings, farming,and other activities.This notwithstanding, the power corridor is a unique opportunity to establish a continuous open space through urbanized areas that is supportive of wildlife. The use of native vegetation can reduce water consumption and operational expenses(mowing, invasives control) in maintaining the trail corridor.The corridor's different combinations of soils, slope,exposure,and moisture can support a broad and diverse range of plants.Grasslands,shrub, riparian areas,woodlands and farmlands all have value for wildlife.Wetlands,smaller streams,and other natural features can be protected and even enhanced with thoughtful trail meanders and amenities and by the use of bridges and boardwalks. This chapter provides guidance for restoring or conserving three primary habitat types that support wildlife and wildlife movements: • Prairie grasslands • Woodlands and forests • Wetlands and riparian areas ;Idenrod Clarki.A • 44)10 4re.1016. ¶S • • .f, ;t lowseil=r,1 Joe • i $5 • ,..4170.0 • Prairie Aune rass Figure 12 Prairie grassland vegetation and wildlife Source:Metro 89 This chapter also describes and illustrates the power utility maintenance requirements that will determine the types of habitat that are possible. Following sections outline approaches and practices for making a variety of trail crossing structures and features more wildlife-friendly. Standards for managing invasive species and general habitat restoration and conservation principles are followed by a prairie grasslands restoration toolbox.Separate sections on stewardship of forested lands and wetlands along the trail conclude the chapter.Plant lists for all three habitats are included in Plan Report No.3 (Appendix C). Utility partner standards Between the Tualatin River and North Bethany,much of the Westside Trail will be within the power transmission corridor controlled by BPA and PGE. Even after the trail turns east and approaches Portland's Forest Park,a substantial portion of the trail will be under or near BPA power lines.Any habitat improvements within the corridor must be compatible with power utility vegetation maintenance standards and access requirements.Vegetation under power lines must be low- growing and cannot exceed the maximum heights at maturity stipulated by BPA and PGE.There may be some trail sections with enough clearance under the power lines to accommodate woody plants,but most of the Westside Trail located under the power lines will be most suitable for prairie grassland habitat,as native grasses and wildflowers seldom reach more than three feet in height. The figure below graphically illustrates BPA and PGE standards for vegetation limits within the power corridor. - PGE Wk.tower I i i I � p typical win height r"—v� IPA H$eme pole ( dv - \ loation win _ �y teln •V!$ — • ?it wont as win 3 / +b'~e I\ ' eons l I �`�+'� dr • i�� 1p �42 d o+u 25 rprirdat: WIRE ZONE 0OII0ERZONE Power attldor width verbs from 207 to 225'wide 0 50 SCALE: 1'=S0 _J Figure 13 Vegetation limitations in BPA and PGE power corridor Illustration credit:Gregg Everhart 90 Bonneville Power Administration In 1993, BPA established guidelines19 for revegetation practices to mitigate impacts to visually and environmentally sensitive areas within BPA right of way.Vegetation plans for the Westside Trail will need to be approved by BPA. BPA guidelines include useful principles and plant lists for shrubs and small trees which should be referenced at the time of trail design and engineering and also as part of trail maintenance standards.The BPA list includes exotic plants that can be invasive;the best options for wildlife are the native species on the list. BPA's Division of Facilities Engineering-Environmental Section is responsible for assessing the physical and visual impacts of transmission facilities. Heights of trees,shrubs,and groundcover in BPA right-of way are limited in order to maintain safe and reliable power transmission service. Reviews of Westside Trail plans with BPA staff in 2012 indicated that a 25-foot radius free from vegetation other than mowed grass should be maintained around wood power poles and a 50-foot radius from steel lattice towers.Utility standards specify grass but the primary parameter is "mowable." Mowable wildflowers and other low vegetation will satisfy utility requirements and greatly increase habitat values. No vegetation that can grow to over 10 feet tall and no tree species whatsoever can be planted in the BPA corridor.Exceptions are possible in areas where power line infrastructure crosses over deep ravines and gullies (such as in Segment 2). The BPA Transmission Facilities Vegetation Management Program is responsible for management of vegetation in right of way.While the primary purpose of the program is to ensure reliable operation of the transmission system power,it also seeks to ensure public and worker safety, technical and economic efficiency, multiple uses of right of way,protection of environmental quality,and use of integrated pest management.Screening is sometimes allowed near private residences,recreational trail crossings,river and road crossings,or areas of high scenic value.The study states"it is desirable to retain vegetation wherever practical for its aesthetic value,wildlife habitat value,erosion control and other environmental benefits." Portland General Electric PGE does not have formal published standards for power corridor vegetation management. PGE's Forestry Department publishes a pamphlet titled Trees and transmission lines:Planting and maintenance guidelines aimed at private owners of land near to or under power lines.This pamphlet includes tables of acceptable native tree species and trees to avoid.These two tables are adapted and reproduced below. 19 BPA(Bonneville Power Administration). 1994.Revegetation guidelines for BPA rights-of-way study.Final document.Prepared by David Evans and Associates,Inc. 91 Table 23 PGE's allowed trees Common name Botanical name Height at M maturity Sitka willow Salix sitchensis 15' Coast willow Salix hoakerlana 15' Red twig dogwood Cornus stolonifiera 6' Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa 15' Vine maple Acer circinatum 15' Indian Plum Oemlerla cerasiformis 12' Oceanspray ' Holodiscus discolor 12' Beaked hazelnut Corylus cornuto 12' Pacific ninebark Physocarpus apitatus 12' Mountain alder Alnus tenu folia 15' Pacific wax myrtle Myrka cal fornka 15' Mock orange Philadeiphus lewisii 8' Western mountain ash Sorbus sitchensis 15' Douglas maple Acer glabrum v.douglasil 12' Table 24 PGE's trees to avoid (many are nonnative or invasive) Alder Hawthorn _ Pines Ash Fir Austrian Black Mountain Douglas Japanese Black Oregon Grand Ponderosa Beech White Scotch Hemlock Shore Birch Sugar Catalpa Mountain White Western Cedar Redwoods/Sequoia Deodora lit Ma le --- Incense p Port Orford Big Leaf Sweetgum Western Red Red Sycamore Cherry Norway varieties Walnut Most native cherry Silver Willow species grow too tall Sugar (most types) Chestnut Oak Oregon White Cottonwood/Poplar Pin Black Cottonwood Red Lombardy Poplar Tulip Tree (Yellow Poplar) 92 PGE provided specification notes and drawings of lattice tower and H-frame power structures. These were combined with BPA information to create Figure 13. Vegetation heights are limited as transmission power lines can sag between poles and lattice towers. For wooden H-frame poles,power lines can sag to 20 feet above the ground in worst-case operating conditions. Lattice tower power lines can sag to 22.5 feet above the ground.This input translates to the following principles for vegetation maintenance within PGE power corridors: • Vegetation is restricted to a height of no greater than 15 feet at maturity within 30 feet of both sides from centerline of transmission towers and lines. • Vegetation is restricted to a height of no greater than 35 feet at maturity from 30 feet to 62.5 feet of both sides from centerline of transmission towers and lines. Danger trees are those that when falling could come within 30 feet of the centerline of transmission towers and lines.A sighting line that rises at a 42 degree angle, 30 feet away from the centerline is used to locate and check any tall trees that have obvious signs that indicate a potential failure risk. Trail crossings The Westside Trail crosses numerous roads,including US 26,and a light rail line.There will be many opportunities to improve habitat quality and connectivity and provide for safer wildlife movement as road crossings are built. Because accommodations for wildlife can greatly increase the cost of crossings,the implementation strategy for this master plan includes grant resources that could help defray costs.Practices for midblock road crossings,crossing lighting,and bridges and boardwalks are discussed below. Road crossings Except for US 26,all Westside Trail road crossings will be at-grade.At-grade crossings are typically the least desirable crossing type for wildlife because few effective enhancements are possible. Metro's Wildlife Crossings:Providing safe passage for urban wildlife20 states"vegetation along roadways and in medians can have both positive and negative effects."Careful selection and management of vegetation can help to offset the negative effects.When crossings are made more wildlife-friendly,overall habitat connectivity is improved.Having both transportation planners and wildlife biologists on the trail design team can ensure that safety and connectivity are optimized for people and wildlife. • Where power transmission infrastructure restrictions and trail user sight lines allow, existing habitat should be left intact or new habitat provided as close to the crossing as possible to provide for wildlife cover. • Fencing can direct wildlife toward the safer areas to cross both at-grade and under roads and over bridges and boardwalks. 20 http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfin/go/by.web/id=38104 93 Undercrossings designed for wildlife passage using a variety of culvert designs can be very effective.Such undercrossings are not included in Westside Trail Master Plan midblock crossing concepts or cost estimates but could be considered on a case-by-case basis.One useful resource is the Federal Highway Administration's Wildlife Crossing Structure Handbook.21 Undercrossings of roads in highly urbanized areas may be essential to conservation of small animals that need to move along the corridor.Larger animals,such as deer and coyotes,are highly mobile and can navigate roads with relative ease,while small animals,such as turtles and salamanders,move more slowly and can be sensitive to artificial substrates such as asphalt. Lighting at road crossings Lighting at road crossing may be used to increase trail user and on-road vehicle safety.Many wildlife species,however,will avoid lighted areas or be more vulnerable to vehicle strikes from being temporarily blinded by lighting. Locating wildlife vegetation cover as far from crossing lighting as possible may provide better conditions for wildlife.This also means that wildlife will be less likely to use the area of the designated crossing where slowing vehicle traffic may reduce the odds of wildlife strikes,further emphasizing the value of safe undercrossings. 21 http://www.ctlhd.gov/programs/techdevelopment/wildlife/documents/0I_Wildlife_Crossing_Structures_Handbook.pdf 94 Major bridge and boardwalk crossings Three major bridge structures are . planned along the Westside Trail. t •t. All the bridges planned for the , - Westside Trail are described in .;. ' the master plan as conventional structures,as are the numerous ,�} _ • , minor bridges and boardwalks / / y ', 11 i --... (see Plan Report No 2 and the Trail Design Typology chapter of ' ,` , 1-1:4- Plan Report No 3 for more ' ' a details). ' ,.. .--kiii The Tualatin River and US 26 1 bridge crossings involve j�� 4 t` _. estimated spans of 330 feet and -÷',../.-1- ' L4- 230 feet,respectively,and Image 9 Ki-a-Kuts Bridge over the Tualatin River approach structures.A bridge Photo credit:City of Tualatin crossing across a ravine on Bull Mountain in Segment 2 will require a 100-foot bridge span. The Ki-a-Kuts Bridge (see photo above) connects the cities of Tigard and Tualatin across the Tualatin River and is an example of an attractive and highly effective crossing that primarily accommodates human traffic.The proposed US 26 and Tualatin River bridges could include added design and habitat features to greatly improve wildlife passage.The bridge illustrated below shows how an otherwise conventional highway crossing bridge can also accommodate habitat for wildlife in a simple and straightforward manner. 1 /iliks rllun ii %' 6 i 7. ...........„,„,....-----t-- . . . f .= Y.'∎ :irt {• ''•; :y`.G, f , jP JJX1.4' . • I ,Y � 1. • r V. Image 10 Wildlife friendly highway overpass Photo credit: Marcel Huijser 95 Bridge design principles to benefit wildlife include: • Incorporate contiguous habitat on bridge approaches and the bridge span itself. Plant native grasses and scattered shrubs,and do not mow the grass so it can provide cover. • Lay small logs,rock piles,brush piles,or pipes along the length of the bridge to provide cover for small animals. Do not build a curb between the bridge's bicycle/pedestrian trail and wildlife habitat. • There is a relationship between crossing length and willingness to cross-wildlife is more willing to cross short overpasses than long ones.Similarly,animals are more willing to use wide crossings than narrow ones. Make the crossing as wide and short as possible. • Include natural structure and/or weave native materials into safety and security fencing and barriers along the bridge structure,particularly for birds and arboreal (tree-dwelling) mammals.Ropes or other similar structures extended from fencing or barriers to nearby trees and other natural features can also improve wildlife passage. Other bridge and boardwalk crossings Relatively short and low elevation bridges or boardwalks are planned to cross small streams or wetlands in several trail segments.These streams and wetlands are wildlife movement corridors that provide safe connections for wildlife between habitat patches.There are wildlife-friendly features that enhance trail bridges and boardwalks.Some of the ideas below may better and more practically apply to different spans and construction materials and techniques,and the type of area being crossed -wetland,seasonal stream,etc. • Preserve existing cover habitat or create additional new habitat as close to each end of the crossing as possible. • Cover habitat could include unmowed native grasses,scattered shrubs,or small logs,pipes, and rock and brush piles. • Add natural structure to bridge or boardwalk safety fencing by weaving in native materials used by birds and arboreal mammals,and provide connections to adjacent off-bridge habitat in the form of ropes or other structures. • Span the entire high-water floodway of the stream or wetland being crossed to allow wildlife passage under the bridge or boardwalk and to maintain the highest stream function. • Maintain a 2-foot minimum width abovewater pathway for wildlife under bridges and a minimum clearance between the pathway and bridge underside of at least two feet. • Retain as much openness and natural light under the bridge as possible,including grates or slots in the bridge deck to allow light to pass through. • Retain or enhance native soils and natural flat benches under bridges,and retain or install structures such as boulders,to allow for wildlife passage during high water. • If light,water,and soils allow, install shrubs and other native vegetation under bridges. 96 Invasive plant species Invasive plants are a problem throughout the trail corridor,particularly in grassland areas which have been highly disturbed by prior development,utility maintenance practices,and human activity. Invasive plants can out-compete native species thus limiting or shrinking habitats supporting a wide range of wildlife. • Efforts at invasive removal and eradication should always be paired with installing native species. • Follow integrated pest management principles to control invasive plants. • When working across large landscapes,consider phased removal of invasive plants to _ provide for continued wildlife cover and structure until restored areas become established. Image 11 Invasive Himalayan blackberry Photo credit:Jim Rapp Habitat restoration and conservation principles The Westside Trail corridor is a unique open space and wildlife habitat ranging from 100 feet to 225 feet wide and extending south to north across nearly the entire area of urbanized eastern Washington County and then eastward into Multnomah County and the City of Portland.The Westside Trail will be aligned within this corridor to minimize impacts to existing habitat,and trail management will include control of invasive species and establishment of native plant communities. Improved habitat will enhance the trail user experience by providing a pleasant visual appearance and opportunities to view wildlife. There are existing habitat values to conserve in some segments,and the potential for restoration is substantial. More than 99 percent of the region's prairie habitat has been lost to development and land conversion.Height restrictions for vegetation under power lines make restoration of native prairie habitat elements a natural fit.Ten overarching habitat conservation principles should be followed during trail design,engineering,and construction: 1. Involve natural resources specialists or biologists in the trail design and engineering process, and conduct site visits to identify important habitat features and potential impacts to habitat connectivity. 2. Trail alignments and design should take into account the size (patch size)of existing valuable habitat to avoid adverse impact of fragmenting into narrow or small habitat patches. 97 3. Trails and trail amenities should be located in already disturbed or highly altered areas to the greatest extent possible. 4. Habitat restoration plans should be developed for all poorer quality habitat areas crossed by the trail. 5. Work closely with the power utilities to understand and comply with vegetation type,location and height limitations in order to establish higher quality habitat. 6. Trail alignments should act as a catalyst for habitat restoration and as opportunities for widening existing buffers- riparian,wetland,and other habitats. 7. Trail alignments should improve access to both restored habitat areas and areas with existing high-quality habitat,provided this habitat can be protected from inappropriate uses. 8. Consider wildlife species'ability to move through or across certain trail features.Certain types of trail surfaces,sun exposure,drying out from lower moisture,lack of cover for hiding from predators,and trail retaining walls are barriers to some species.Road crossings are especially problematic for wildlife,and the impacts of road widths,vegetation and lighting should be considered. 9. Provide interpretive signage along the trail and at crossings informing trail users about the values of wildlife and the restored habitat along the trail corridor,including encouraging trail users to keep pets on leash and providing"wildlife on trail"signage. 10. In woodlands and forested areas,trail alignments should maintain canopy connectivity and cover for arboreal species for shade and to retain moisture at the forest floor. Prairie restoration toolbox Prairie was once the dominant _ habitat type in the Tualatin River Basin through which most of the Westside Trail passes.Almost none of these original grasslands remain. I' The Westside Trail could provide r :.r fifteen or more linear miles of an K almost continuous grassland corridor ranging from 100 feet to putvisity b , i Is 4 V. 225 feet wide.This translates to significant acreage that can support s • I wildlife populations and movements 2i?,,yfi .; . among major natural areas such as the Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge,Tualatin Hills Nature Park, Image 12 Unrestored prairie habitat in power corridor and other local nature parks,and Photo credit:Jim Rapp between east-west riparian corridors that the trail crosses such as Bronson and Rock Creeks. 98 Open areas within the power corridor can support a wide range of wildlife.Birds,small mammals, and pollinators such as butterflies and bees will take advantage of the restored habitat. Landscaping and habitat restoration activities in grassland habitats can incorporate swaths of wildflowers and shrub patches to provide food and cover for wildlife.The Chicago Wilderness Magazine's article Power&Plants22 describes a successful program. The following habitat restoration guidelines and practices can be used by a variety of trail stakeholders and users ranging from a design/engineering team developing trail construction specifications to local community groups looking to improve their own particular patch of trail habitat. Figure 14combines habitat patch concepts with power utility limitations. Prairie restoration general guidelines General guidelines for enhancing prairie habitat in the trail corridor include: • When suitable habitat is already present,it should be preserved or replaced if impacted by the trail alignment. • Use native plants in habitat patches,trailside landscaping,and in screening buffers at corridor edges that are appropriate to soil,exposure,and moisture conditions. • Vary habitat patch size with an emphasis on larger patches.Wildflowers can be continuous along the trail,or habitat patches can be spaced and placed alongside other landscaping. Large patches are particularly desirable,and a few larger(half-acre or more)patches of suitable habitat should be incorporated into each trail segment. • Pollinators benefit from large blocks of similarly colored wildflowers.An edging of mixed plantings could be placed around individual patches for a more natural appearance and to visually link the patch with other patches in the trail segment. • Utilize nearby open spaces to increase patch size and improve function for wildlife. Include nearby parks, natural areas,and residential or commercial native landscaping in the overall restoration plan or activity. Locating new or enhanced habitat patches near to neighboring native plant landscapes will create bigger overall patches and additional foraging areas. • Consider landscape maintenance needs in determining trail alignments and habitat restoration plans. Low-stature perennials survive mowing better than many annuals will, especially if mowing occurs early in the year before flowers set seed. 22 http://www.chicagowildemess.org/CW_Archives/issues/summer2005/comed.html 99 Create new habitat patches new existing habitat such as Naturescapitg In adjacent backyard-t Visual screen created by native shrub border— 150'maximum distance between habitat catches , PIP'4".-', s•x s'habitat patch of �+••', .^- ^p Group orbs and greases.by bloom native grasses,annwl 3 x 3 minimum patch slid of\� •�� ^1tt�1tt� eely ddIec late and perennial turbo native(orbs and grasses MIN,- s rroulwith mixed Sorbs and grasses Edge of required clearance area- - - mow graft in 25'radius from > poles an9 So'radius from tower Trail-mow vegetaton next to gravel shoulder as needed PG( lattice tower t 8 L \ BPA 5 H-ooks ■ a. a i w 1/2 acre habitat patch-shape to simplify seasonal mowing; Areas of corridor rot planted as habitat w maed masses of(orbs and grasses may be moved every few may be mowed per od tally or used for \ ) years.group sir an and locate away(torn all mowing tr ail heads,playgrounds,community gardens ) ' o or other land uses desired by community and permitted by utility companies I • 1 1 1 , ma:r•... a So Figure 14 Habitat patches,screening and mowing in BPA and PGE corridor Illustration credit:Gregg Everhart Prairie habitat restoration practices and techniques • The least mobile wildlife (such as bees and butterflies)are best accommodated by suitable habitat patches no more than 50 yards apart. • A habitat patch that provides effective pollinator foraging habitat should include several flower colors to attract a variety of species. • For pollinators,install native plants in clumps of a minimum size of three feet by three feet; greater than 25 square feet is better. Having many plants of a single species in a clump increases foraging efficiency. • Within each color block,several species with different bloom times will provide pollen and nectar throughout the season. • Retain or create areas of downed wood,rock piles or other similar features near prairie patches to provide nesting habitat for invertebrates,foraging habitat for birds and small mammals,and cover for small mammals and reptiles. • Provide perches,nest boxes,and nesting structure for birds. • Evergreen shrubs should be incorporated into habitat patches to provide shelter in winter months. 100 • Retain or create new unobstructed habitat on each side of the corridor where slopes require the use of switchbacks to meet acceptable trail grades.This provides an alternative route for small animals that do not navigate walls or paved surfaces. Forests and woodlands conservation toolbox Forests and woodlands are home to many kinds of wildlife,especially where surface water is available.Along the Westside Trail corridor,substantial stands of woodlands and forests are found in the northeasternmost trail segments approaching Forest Park.There are also woodlands on Bull Mountain.General guidelines for conserving and enhancing wildlife habitat in forest and woodland habitats include: • Align the trail along forest � edges rather than through ' � r forests wherever l ossible 4 =. p ' ! to reduce habitat _ -w fragmentation. } i • Plant the nonforested side - Lam*►_ /, of the trail to expand forest ' : :1 habitat. - • If the trail must be aligned • r through a forested area, retain canopy connectivity •4 . to maintain forest climate (shade and moisture)and travel routes for tree- Image 13 Woodland trail in Forest Park dwelling wildlife. Photo credit:Gregg Everhart • Design and engineer trail alignments and infrastructure and apply trail construction and maintenance methods that retain and preserve trees wherever possible. • Consider using existing trails and pathways through forested areas,except where existing alignments create adverse impacts or widening and expansion of the existing pathway may create additional impacts. • Trees felled during trail construction should be left in place for habitat enhancement. • Retain or create forest habitat on each side of the trail where slopes require the use of switchbacks to meet acceptable trail grades. • Use native plants when restoring habitat along trails in forested areas,including native evergreens to provide winter cover for wildlife. • Retain or create forest floor shrub habitat. Wetlands,streams, and riparian conservation toolbox More than 90 percent of the metropolitan Portland region's wildlife species use water-associated habitats at some point in their lives,whether for feeding,traveling,reproducing or other purposes. 101 Animals such as dragonflies and pond-breeding amphibians start their lives in wetlands and use uplands in their adult phases.Both adequate water and connections to adjacent uplands are important to wildlife lifecycles.General guidelines for conserving and enhancing wildlife habitat in wetland,stream,and riparian areas along the trail corridor include: • Avoid wetland crossings whenever possible. 4tatiktgki. . . • Align the trail so thereisa vegetated buffer between * -- it } the trail and wetland. Buffers provide habitat for - i wildlife species and help ' ' *' ' reduce the potential for wetland and stream -- pollution generated by ;` • .' trail usage. • If avoiding a wetland �_ , I` • crossing is not possible, " , ..,;c st reduce impacts by using bridges and boardwalks. Image 14 Bronson Creek wetlands Photo credit:Jim Rapp • If wetland views are desired, use viewing platforms or areas with appropriate barriers and signage to discourage off-trail wandering. • As part of trail construction,enhance or restore degraded or impacted wetlands by removing invasive nonnative plants and replanting with appropriate native plants. • Where forested areas or woodlands are adjacent to wetlands crossed by the trail,design and construct the trail to maintain functioning wetland and forest connectivity for wildlife species that use both habitats. • Minimize stream crossings to protect riparian areas. • Trails along streams should be restricted to one side of the stream outside of existing riparian areas,and the upland side of the trail should be planted to expand the riparian area. • Provide occasional near-stream viewing areas so trail users desiring water views or access do not create informal trails. • If a trail must cross a wetland or pass between a wetland and adjacent uplands,align the trail to minimize the crossing and maintain wetland connectivity. 102 AIS-1684 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Arbor Month Update and Tree City USA Award Submitted By: Marissa Grass,Community Development Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting -Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Annual Arbor Day report and recognition of the City of Tigard's activities and accomplishments in urban forestry. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Receive staff report and Tree City USA Award recognizing the city's leadership and accomplishments in advancing urban and community forestry projects and activities. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY J. Sterling Morton first proposed a tree planting holiday,Arbor Day,which was celebrated on April 10, 1872, in Nebraska.Today,many communities across the nation celebrate trees on Arbor Day.The state of Oregon declares an entire week as Arbor Week,instead of a single day. Here in Tigard,there are many ways for residents and business owners to get involved and help the city celebrate Arbor Day. Events are planned all month long. Highlights include: •Arbor Week Quiz Sunday,April 6 through Saturday,April 12,Library Children's Desk-All Ages If you love trees,picture books and picture books with trees,show your love by playing our tree matching game! How many trees featured in picture books you can match with their real tree counterparts?Turn in your answers for a chance to win. •Arbor Day Toddler Time Wednesday,April 9, 10:15-10:45 a.m.AND 11:15-11:45 a.m.,Library Puett Room-Ages 24-36 months Sing and read about trees at this special Arbor Week toddler time. •Arbor Day Family Story Time Friday,April 11, 10:15-11 a.m.AND 11:15 a.m.-12 p.m.,Library Puett Room-Ages 0-6 years Celebrate Arbor Day with a special family story time! Bring the whole gang for tree-themed stories, songs,and super-duper silliness. Check out the library's Arbor Day display and booklist too! •Arbor Month Celebration and Tree Planting Thursday,April 17,9:30 a.m.Tree Planting& 10:30 a.m. Celebration -Fanno Creek Trail at Grant Avenue. Mayor Cook will celebrate Arbor Month by planting new trees with students from Tigard High School's (CE) 2 Program on the newly constructed Fanno Creek Trail segment which takes you from Main Street in downtown Tigard,through an existing underpass beneath Pacific Highway 99W to Grant Avenue. Come join the fun,but don't forget your rain boots! •Tree City USA Awards and Recognition-An Arbor Day observance and proclamation are one of four standards established by the National Arbor Day Foundation to qualify for Tree City USA.This is the thirteenth year Tigard has received this recognition,and the city's fourteenth Arbor Day celebration. More information about Tigard's tree programs and policies can be found at www.tigard-or.gov/trees or read about the Tree City USA program at www.arborday.org/TreeCityUSA. •National Planning Excellence Award -Tigard's Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project(UFCRP) will receive the 2014 National Planning Excellence Award for a Best Practice from the American Planning Association (APA) for its innovative, flexible,and incentive-based approach to urban forestry.APA's national awards program is the profession's highest honor,and recognizes outstanding projects for leadership on planning issues. The Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project will receive the 2014 National Planning Excellence Award for a Best Practice at APA's National Planning Conference in Atlanta during a special luncheon on Tuesday,April 29,2014. For more information on the award,visit www.planning.org/awards/2014. For more information on the Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project, visit www.tigard-or.gov/trees. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION On March 25,2014,Mayor Cook signed an Arbor Month Proclamation declaring April as Arbor Month in the City of Tigard. Attachments No fk(s)attached • C I T Y O F T I G A R D Respect and Care ! Do the Right Thing I Get it Done TIGARD Arbor Day 2014 Community Development April 22, 2014 C I T Y OF T I G A R D Tree City USA Award 1 Tigard has been named a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation to honor its commitment to the community forest. C 1 1' Y () F I' I C S A R D ii Arbor Month Celebration ,��° 4- : . . and Tree Planting • �} r / -r• City of Tigard / Tigard High School CE(2) Program ARBOR MONTH CELEBRATION AND TREE PLANTING Thursday, April 17 9:30 a.m.Tree Planting • 10:30 a.m.Celebration 2'X 2 P.T.D.F.B'-0'TREE STAKES DO Fanno Creek Trail at Grant Avenue NOT PENETRATE ROOT BALL (S-STAKES '�/ PER TREE-ONE COAT OLYMPIC STAIN Phase pal us as Mayan Cook celebrates Arbor Month by pantry new trees nth A `1\� /713 REQUIRED) students Pon Tigard Nigh School's(CE)2 Program a"a newly constructed segneo `L�'�'^A�``l�ii� TREE TES/RUBBER HOSE W/12 GAUGE d tat FamO CneUn Traa.The ban segment cmrtcn Man Street n downtown Tigard _I `I�R1klii�/` GALE.lES/ to Grant Aweswe,tfvpgN a neonatal uldeWn teneam Paclrc NgMag99wV. �� `�i/t�� . TREE WRAP- FROM GROUND TO FIRST Tls cekbraban and piano g effort has been made posse.*through close �, • caaaaaratom web Tgand Tualatin Scholl DtbKt staff and City or Tigard staff. Y CUT&REMOVE BOTTOM OF WIRE BASKET The panting palette ncludes natal bees dense,for thew low water and REMOVE BURLAP a TWINE FROM TOP manteance reawwmnets.So.come Ion tat Tun.but dent forget your rain boats• OF BALL AFTER STAKING. P A..Id ROOTBALL 3'MIN ABOVE JACEN . F_IryISH GRADE OF PLANTING OR TURF 1 B-0"MIN.DIM.N.DEPTH HRCLE WATER 7'W44141*R1r0 BASIN 1 THE WIS.DEPTH(TURF AREAS) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. in BACKFILL SOIL MIXTURE AS SPEOFIED.ir- p....ter- (l!ow;-Dmillgti? SCF PLANTING T ODEL EP-1850)U 111 SET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. in BEST-PAKS AS SPECIFIED. 111 a TREES&SHRUBS TYP. rn.aso 2 X OIA.OF ROOT BALL •ROOT BARRIER REVD.WHERE TREES ARE WITHIN 5-0"OF ANY CURB OR SIDEWALK EDGES- MIN. 6'-0'LENGTHS REQUIRED art tfnWea I miry aersgrwnh e.ya nwr w IINIi'III can OH I s..rryy.•ao+'•rsnrta. C I '1' �' () F T I G A R ID Celebration Planting .. :4',, t , \, '' 'f s0 / To celebrate Arbor Day, the . ;,- ° ; f 'r . °_t;. I. y City and the Tigard-Tualatin `` School District (TTSD) joined - % forces to plant 11 trees on• A. the Fanno Creek Trail.j �,� 1�� L - • .• _ 'ALL / '. ` i iki. 13 � I, . � _ xx, . C I "1' '1 () F '1' I G AR 1) Arbor Month Events Celebrate all year long • - Palm dacha dacha Apple Tree Boom •°•.�, Tree lope vORqR. itw. ' Tree ti Mimosa ''111K Tree 4 • • I,�i' Y'.Srm I C I T Y OF T I G A R D National Planning Award • Tigard's Urban Forestry Code Revisions Project has been awarded National Planning Excellence Award for a Best Practice Award by the American Planning Association. S r Urban Forestry C ode Revisions Project 1)7 4 PLANNING A W A R D RECIPIENT A multi-year effort to revise Tigard's tree codes,standards and procedures C I T1 Y 0 F T I G A R I) Thank You / To all of our volunteers and residents who have planted and cared for trees over the past year — thank you ! 416,1 '4-,% ',0-.,,, ' ' N ": k' :',4 t' • Ailk ,., i s., S '..--11-Arig b '^ ►, , 'lb i r - ,F.— _-'1 t:: ,c .: - as....;' t- *.-7,. --: * - i _ . .-4,-.. AIS-1710 5, Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes):5 Minutes Agenda Title: Proclaim May 5 - 11,2014 Be Kind to Animals Week Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson,City Management Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson,City Management Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Proclamation Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Should Mayor Cook proclaim May 5-11 as Be Kind to Animals Week? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Issue the proclamation. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Be Kind to Animals Week commemorates the role animals play in our lives,promotes ways to continue to treat all animals humanely and encourages others,especially children, to do the same. OTHER ALTERNATIVES n/a COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Tigard Mayors have issued a proclamation for Be Kind to Animals Week each year since 2002. Attachments Be Kind to Animals t i•, n 1 , cto ;oiirPftom.eort, 1 ..... Cin of Tig rd : ti �� y BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK k`�'•"� May 5-11, 2014 �I WHEREAS,Oregonians benefit tremendously from our animal friends,who give us '1.1kr, companionship and great pleasure in our daily lives;and WHEREAS,we have a firm responsibility to protect these fellow creatures from need, pain,fear and suffering;and 1!;. WHEREAS,we recognize that teaching attitudes of kindness, consideration and respect for all living things through humane education in the schools and the community helps to .s;' 3r provide the basic values on which a humane and civilized society is built;and <i WHEREAS,we are deeply indebted to the Oregon Humane Societies for more than 100 " r" ` _ years of invaluable service in caring for homeless animals, instilling humane values in our # :, children through education programs, and promoting a true working spirit of kindness and •. consideration for animals in the hearts and minds of all people; and / Ny WHEREAS,we depend greatly upon our animal control agencies,veterinarians and other ,, organizations that provide humane care for animals; and WHEREAS, May 5-11, 2014 is set aside nationwide to observe the philosophy of . • kindness to animals. 4. NOW NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, Mayor John Cook of the City of Tigard, -.• N, Oregon,do hereby proclaim the week of May 5-11,2014 as s ' 1` ;y- BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK ' in Tigard, Oregon and urge our citizens, businesses and organizations to join in this . , observance. 1My 1 l�-' ar, Dated this day of ,2014. • __.4; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed. ,. '� `�'RS{! l John L. Cook, Mayor • :r City of Tigard . ' Attest: (' ` L. City Recorder I 411 d1),A :::::,i'vjv,<- : . ,. . . .. . . . . I -- . : ___:-411--; c4 1 L_ AIS-1726 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes):5 Minutes Agenda Title: Proclaim May as Bike Month Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson,City Management Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson,City Management Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Meeting Type: Proclamation Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Should Mayor Cook proclaim May 2014 as Bike Month in Tigard? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Issue the proclamation. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At their March 27,2014 Bike and Pedestrian Bicycle Subcommittee meeting,committee members requested Mayor Cook proclaim May as National Bike Month in Tigard. According to the League of American Bicyclists,Americans are showing an increased interest in healthy,sustainable and economical transportation options and bicycle commuting meets all three needs. Hundreds of communities have been successful in increasing bicycle commuting by promoting Bike to Work Day and many people who participate in a local Bike to Work Day event(as first-time commuters) become regular bike commuters. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION A proclamation in support of bike commuting has been issued in 2012 and 2013. Attachments Bike Month Proclamation 1 -- y :I; ,.,; ' .,., , . 'CR.-ZL..- ...c'r _., . -, r.__ .,. . .,tb,. ......., , , „\„ ,: 77 ti s itkowo oryolTigard ',:�� BIKE MONTH ��; :* May 2014 '- WHEREAS,the bicycle is a viable and environmentally sound form of transportation,as ., well as an excellent form of recreation and physical activity;and x if WHEREAS, many Tigard residents will experience the joys of bicycling this summer V. through educational programs,commuting events,trail work days, helmet promotions, - " recreational bike rides and other bicycling events;and '"" " r h • ,,.�. WHEREAS,the bicycle offers a clean,quiet,affordable and healthy alternative to • automobile commuting;and -. .4 WHEREAS,the national nonprofit League of American Bicyclists has declared the ;..a month of May as National Bike Month for each of the last 58 years,and has done so :A again in 2014;and fic -V WHEREAS,during the month of May,several bicycle organizations, hospitals, businesses,and civic groups throughout Oregon will be promoting bicycling as a v F�a Y� wholesome transportation and leisure activity,as well as an environmentally friendly c. I'.A. alternative to the automobile;and F WHEREAS,the City of Tigard has authorized the formation of a Transportation Advisory .,.II- Committee,which includes a Pedestrian and Bicyclist Subcommittee,to provide expertise and citizen input to staff and Council t -t, ` NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, Mayor John Cook of the City of Tigard, f do hereby declare May 2014 as ;�, - BIKE MONTH and May 7 as Bike to School Day,and May 16 as Bike to Work Day in Tigard. I .I encourage all residents to recognize the importance of bicycle safety and be more aware # of cyclists on Tigard's streets and highways. '` Y, Dated this day of ,2014. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed. '� r .1. :4.4..e.{ John L. Cook, Mayor r.. -, City of Tigard w �" Attest: .� r •, y City Recorder ! ` `' AIS-1682 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: FY 2014 Third Quarter Budget Amendment Submitted By: Carissa Collins, Financial and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Resolution Business Public Hearing-Legislative Meeting- Main Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication 04/17/2014 Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE An amendment to the FY 2014 Adopted Budget is being submitted for revenues and expenses that were unknown at the time of adoption. The following issues will be addressed in the amendment and require council action: 1.Grant Recognitions 2.Payroll Reallocations 3.Overtime Reimbursements 4.Capital Improvement Program (CIP) STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST Approve the FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Budget Amendment. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The following is the list of items requiring council action: City Operations 1. Community Development-Grant Recognition •The supplemental will recognize the $245,000 Metro grant for the River Terrace Community Plan.This grant will fund two critical elements of the plan: the Public Facility Plan Update as well as an infrastructure financing strategy. 2. Public Works -Movement of payroll expenses •A request is made to move payroll expenses for the Project Director position for the Lake Oswego/Tigard Water Partnership from General Fund to the Water Fund. If approved,this action will be effective as of 10/31/2013. In addition,payroll for a Senior Utility Worker that is currently funded 50-50 between Stormwater and Sanitary Sewer but should be funded 100%in Stormwater due to the nature of the work being performed. 3. Police -Recognition of Grants •The city has received a total of$23,081 in grant funding to be recognized by council.Two grants in the amount of$18,481 have been received that will reimburse the city for police overtime relating to work done for the Internal Revenue Service taskforce for$10,000,and another in the amount of$8,481 for overtime reimbursement at Washington Square Mall during the holiday season.Additionally,a grant in the amount of$4,600 from Homeland Security was obtained to purchase a police radio. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 4. CIP Funding Reallocations -Parks A request to reallocate funding for three Parks projects is required in order to maximize the use of Parks Bond. A total of$463,080 of project funding will be reallocated within the Parks System. A total of $442,080 will be moved from Parks Bond to Parks SDC and$21,000 will be allocated to the General Fund. The projects are as follows: 92016-Dirksen Nature Park=$144,240 from Parks Bond to Parks SDC;92022 Jack Park=$261,840 from Parks Bond to Parks SDC;and 92048-Summer Lake Restroom Improvements=$57,000 of which$36,000 from Parks Bond to Parks SDC and$21,000 to General Fund. 5.CIP Funding Reallocations-Transportation A total of$725,050 of project funding for 95035-72nd Avenue/Dartmouth Street Intersection Improvements for$610,050 and 95041-Upper Boones Ferry Road Adaptive Signal Coordination for$115,000 will be reallocated from Gas Tax Fund to the Transportation Development Tax Fund.This reallocation will allow for the maximization of Gas Tax funds for other eligible projects. 6.CIP Budget Adjustments-Parks Additional appropriation in the amount of$39,630 of Park SDC funds is required for development of a site master plan for Bull Mountain Park. 7.CIP Budget Adjustments-Transportation A request for additional appropriation is needed for 95001-Pavement Management Program(PMP).A total of$65,000 of Street Maintenance Fee funds for the PMP is required in order to comply with curb ramps that are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act. 8.CIP Budget Adjustments-Transportation An additional appropriation in the amount of$70,000 of Gas Tax funds is being requested for legal fees related to right-of-way as well as the close out of two property files for 97003-Main Street Green Street Retrofit(Phase 1). OTHER ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the supplemental budget amendment. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES,MASTER PLANS Financial Stability DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $272,641 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department/program): CD/PW/PD/CIP Additional Fiscal Notes: The total impact of this amendment will increase total requirements by$272,641 that is offset by additional resources from contingency and grant reimbursements. The net result of the supplemental is to increase budget reserves by$1,272,200. The exhibits and attachments contain the details of each budgetary item Attachments Exhibit A Exhibit B Attachment 1 Resolution FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Revised Adopted Q3 Revised Budget Amendment Budget Affected City Funds Resources Beginning Fund Balance $17,663,053 $ 725,050 $18,388,103 Property Taxes $13,020,535 $ - $13,020,535 I:ranchise Fees $ 5,601,400 $ - S 5,601,400 Special Assessments S - S - S - Licenses&Permits $ 1,337,240 $ 406,080 S 1,743,320 Intergovernmental S 9,527,830 S 268,081 S 9,795,911 Charges for Services S 3,230,653 $ - S 3,230,653 I ines&Forfeitures $ 1,098,783 S - $ 1,098,783 Interest Earnings $ 197,550 $ - $ 197,550 Miscellaneous $ 134,051 S - S 134,051 Other Financing Sources $ 361,000 $ - S 361,000 Transfers In to)m Other Funds S 13,198,651 S 109,630 S 13,308,284 _ _, Total Resou 5,374-.249_- $ 1,5 s'ro con Requirements Policy and Administration S 802,516 S - S 802,516 Community Development S 3,015,448 S 245,000 S 3,260,448 Community Services S 20,136,393 S 23,081 S 20,159,474 Public Works S 7,722,073 S - S 7,722,073 Program Expenditures Total $31,676,430 $ 268,081 $31,944,511 Debt Service $ 606,378 S - S 606,378 Loans $ 361,000 $ - S 361,000 Work-In-Progress S 13,261,728 S 174,630 S 13,436,358 Transfers to Other Funds S 11,341,958 S 109,630 S 11,451,588 Contingency S 1,552,780 S (315,700) S 1,237,080 Total Budget $58,800,274 $ 236,641 $59,036,915 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,570,475 $ 1,272,200 $ 7,842,675 Requirements $65,370,749 $ 1,508,841 $66,879,590 1 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items: 1,2,3,4 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,156,853 S - $ 8,156,853 Property Taxes $13,020,535 $ - $ 13,020,535 Franchise Fees $ 5,601,400 $ - S 5,601,400 Special Assessments $ - $ - S - licenses&Permits S 900,135 S - $ 900,135 Intergovernmental S 5,617,904 $ 268,081 S 5,885,985 Charges for Services $ 3,230,653 $ - $ 3,230,653 Fines&Forfeitures $ 1,098,783 S - S 1,098,783 Interest Earnings S 103,722 S - S 103,722 Miscellaneous S 73,754 S - $ 73,754 Other Financing Sources $ 361,000 S - $ 361,000 Transfers In f r o m Other Inn i- $ - S $ - Total Resources 268,081 Requirements Policy and Administration S 802,516 S - $ 802,516 Community Development S 3,015,448 S 245,000 S 3,260,448 Community Services $20,136,393 S 23,081 $ 20,159,474 Public Works S 5,477,765 S (112,000) S 5,365,765 Program Expenditures Total $29,432,122 $ 156,081 $29,588,203 Debt Service S - S - S - Loans S 361,000 S - S 361,000 Transfers to Other Funds' S 916,292 S 57,000 S 973,292 Contingency* S 1,192,780 S (57,000) $ 1,135,780 Total Budget $31,902,194 $ 156,081 $32,058,275 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,262,545 $ 112,000 $ 6,374,545 Total Re uircmcnts $38,164,739 $ 268,081 $38,432,820 "GF Contribution of$57,000 for Summerfield Park Restroom 2 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:4 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks Bond Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $4,872,068 $ - $4,872,068 Interest Earniiu s S 4.()2() S - S 4,020 .. Total Resources_ $4,876,088 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 4,876,088 S (463,080) S 4,413,008 Total Budget $4,876,088 $ (463,080) $4,413,008 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ - $ 463,080 $ 463,080 Total Requirements $4,876,088 $ - $4,876,088 3 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:4,6 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks SDC Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $1,873,432 $ - $1,873,432 Licenses&Permits S 257,825 S 406,080 S 663,905 Interest l arnings S 19,782 S - S 19,782 Total Resources $2,151,I $ 406,080 $2,557,119 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 2,065,005 S 445,710 S 2,510,715 Contingency S 75,000 S (39,630) S 35,370 Total Budget $2,140,005 $ 406,080 $2,546,085 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 11,034 $ - $ 11,034 Total Rc uiremcnts $2,151,039 $ 406,080 $2,557,119 4 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:6 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks Capital Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 139,479 S - $ 139,479 Intergovernmental $ 163,074 S - S 163,074 Interest Earnings S 3,015 S - S 3,015 Transfers In from Other Funds 121,573 S 39,630 S 7,461,203 MPIIIIW Total Resources S 7,727,141 S 39,630 $...23M Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - S - Work-In-Progress $7,584,647 $ 39,630 $ 7,624,2 Transfers to Other Funds S 100,397 S - S 100,397 Total Budget $7,685,044 $ 39,630 $ 7,724,674 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 42,097 $ - $ 42,097 Total Requirements $7,727,141 $ 39,63(1 S 7,766,771 5 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items: 5,8 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Gas Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $1,526,663 $ - $1,526,663 Licenses&Permits S 2,602 S - S 2,602 Intergovernmental S 3,746,852 S - S 3,746,852 Interest Earnings S 55,732 S - S 55,732 Miscellaneous S 60,297 S - S 60,297 Transfers In from(Mier Funds S 100,000 S S 100,000 Total Resources $5,42; ► �$ - $5,4 Requirements Public A\orks S 2,244,308 S S 2,244,',115 Program Expenditures Total $2,244,308 $ - $2,244,308 Debt Service $ 606,378 $ - $ 606,378 Transfers to Other Funds $2,604,452 $ (655,050) $1,949,402 Contingency S 35,000 S - S 35,000 Total Budget $5,490,138 $ (655,050) $4,835,088 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 2,008 $ 655,050 $ 657,058 Total Requirements $5,492,146 $ - $5,492,146 6 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:5 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Transportation Development Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 894,189 $ 725,050 $1,619,239 Licenses&Permits S 176,678 S - S 176,678 Interest Earnings S 11.279 S - S 11,279 Total Resources $1,082,146 $ 725,050 $1,807,196 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds S 779,724 S 725,050 $1,504,774 Contingency S 250,000 S - S 250,000 Total Budget $1,029,724 $ 725,050 $1,754,774 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 52,422 $ - $ 52,422 Total Requirements $1,082,146 $ 725,050 $1,807,196 7 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:8 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Transportation CIP Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 200,369 S - $ 200,369 l'ranstcrs In tram Othcr I ands S 5,6--.1)S1 S 0,0011 S 5, -} RSI Total Resources $5,877,450 $ 70,000 $5,947,450 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - S - S - Work-In-Progress S 5,677,081 S 70,000 S 5,747,081 Total Budget $5,677,081 $ 70,000 $5,747,081 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 200,369 $ - $ 200,369 Total Re uirements $5,877,450 $ 70,000 $5,947,450 8 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:7 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Street Maintenance Fee Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $1,106,917 $ - $1,106,917 Licenses&Permits S 1,941,234 $ - $1,941,234 Charges for Services S - S - $ Interest Earnings S 2,043 S - $ 2,043 MIK Total Resources 53,050,194 $ Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress S 1,660,000 $ 65,000 S 1,725,000 Transfers to Other Funds S 208,883 S - $ 208,883 Contingency S 200,000 S (65,000) S 135,000 Total Budget $2,068,883 $ - $2,068,883 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 981,311 $ - $ 981,311 Total Re uirements $3,050,194 $ - $3,050,194 9 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:2 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Sanitary Sewer Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $6,197,119 $ - $6,197,119 Licenses&Permits S 433,800 S - S 433,800 Charges for Services S 1,484,277 S - S 1,484,277 Interest Earnings S 100,333 S - S 100,333 Miscellaneous S 128,788 S - $ 128,788 Transfers In from Other Funds S 1,391,000 S - $1,391,000 Total Resources $9,73 S 7"77-t Requirements Public Works S 1,973,373 S 142,0 Oj S 1,931,303 Program Expenditures Total $1,973,373 $ (42,070) $1,931,303 Work-In-Progress S 5,924,653 $ - $5,924,653 Transfers to Other Funds $ 230,149 $ - S 230,149 Contingcnc■ S 220,000 S - S 220,000 "Total Budget $8,348,175 $ (42,070) $8,306,105 Reserve For Future Expenditure $1,387,142 $ 42,070 $1,429,212 Total Requirements S9,735,317 $ - S9,735,317 10 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-i Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:2 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Stormwater Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $2,516,647 $ - $2,516,647 Charges for Services S 2,053,830 S - $2,053,830 Interest I?arnin s S 7,936 S - $ 7,936 Total Resources $4,578,413 $ Requirements Public Works S 1,442,387 S 42,070 S 1,484,457 Program Expenditures Total $1,442,387 $ 42,070 $1,484,457 Work-In-Progress S 1,165,375 S - S 1,165,375 Transfers to Other Funds S 598,916 S - $ 598,916 Contingency S 100,000 S (42,070) S 57,930 Total Budget $3,306,678 $ - $3,306,678 Reserve For Future Expenditure $1,271,735 $ - $1,271,735_( Total Requirements $4,578,413 $ - $4,578,413 11 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:2 Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Water Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 9,701,503 $ - $ 9,701,503 Licenses&Permits $ 13,202 $ - $ 13,202 Charges for Services $14,240,169 $ - S 14,240,169 Interest Earnings S 30,644 $ - S 30,644 Transfers In fr in OtIICI I und- 58,751 $ - • 58,751 111111111116,Total Resources $24,044,269 $W $24,044,269 Requirements Public Works S 8,239,852 S 112,000 S 8,351,852 Program Expenditures Total $ 8,239,852 $ 112,000 $ 8,351,852 Transfers to Other Funds S 5,785,926 S - $ 5,785,926 Contingency S 350,000 S (112,000) S 238,000 Total Budget $14,375,778 $ - $14,375,778 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 9,668,491 $ - $ 9,668,491 Total Requirements $24,044,269 $ - $24,044,269 12 of 12 SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR �j 2-,.., ao/L/ (DATE OF MEETING)11111 " Cit o Ti and e Y f g /l e E,�;'Q 4 I re-m 7 TI G A R D Memorandum To: Mayor and Council Members From: Carissa Collins, Sr. Management Analyst Re: Third Quarter Budget Amendment Date: April 16, 2014 The Third Quarter Budget Supplemental is scheduled to go before council on April 22, 2014. Since the time that the Agenda Item Summary was submitted to council, staff has received better information concerning 92048-Summer Lake Restroom Improvements. In the initial packet presented to council, the General Fund was contributing $21,000 to this project and $36,000 was being charged to Parks SDC. It was determined that this project is not Parks SDC eligible, therefore, requiring the General Fund contribution to be increased from the initial $21,000 to a total of$57,000. As result, the following have been updated based on this new information: Exhibit A: Item #4—Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Exhibit B: 92048-Summer Lake Restroom Improvements located on page 3 Attachment-1: Affected City Funds (Page 1) General Fund (Page 2) Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I can be reached at 503-718-2643. Thank you. Exhibit A 1.Community Development:Recognition of Grants The city received a grant from Metro in the amount of$245,000 will be used to fund an update of the Public Facility Plan as well as development of an infrastructure financing strategy for the River Terrace Community Plan. This action will increase intergovernmental revenues in the General Fund by$245,000 with an equal increase in program expenditures within Community Development. Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,156,853 $ 8,156,853 Property Taxes S 13,020,535 $ 13,020,535 Franchise Fees $ 5,601,400 S 5,601,400 Licenses&Permits $ 900,135 $ 900,135 Intergovernmental $ 5,617,904 $ 245,000 $ 5,862,904 Charges for Services $ 3,230,653 $ 3,230,653 Fines&Forfeitures S 1,098,783 $ 1,098,783 Interest Earnings $ 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous S 73,754 $ 73,754 Other Financing Sources S 361,0881 S 361,(88) 1ptaalgpurces $ 38,164739 $ 245,009 $ 38,409,739 Requirements Policy and Administration $ 802,516 $ 802,516 Community Development $ 3,015,448 $ 245,000 S 3,260,448 Community Services S 2(1,136,393 $ 20,136,393 Public Works $ 5,477,765 S 5,477,765 Program Expenditures Total $ 29,432,122 $ 245,000 $ 29,677,122 Debt Service $ - S - Loans $ 361,000 S 361,000 Contingency S 1,192,78(1 S 1,192,780 Total Budget $ 31,902,194 $ 245,000 $ 32,147,194 $ 34,372,266 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,262,545 $ - $ 6,262,545 Total Requirements $ 38,164,739 $ 245,000 $ 38,409,739 Exhibit A 2.Public Works-Reallocation of payroll expenses A request is being made to move the payroll for the city's Project Director for the Lake Oswego/Tigard Water Partnership from the General Fund to the Water Fund;effective 10/31/13.In addition,a Sr.Utility Worker's payroll is currently being funded 50-50 in both Stormwater and Sanitary Sewer.Due to the nature of work of this position,payroll should be funded 100°'n in Stormwater.As a result of these actions,program expenditures for Public Works in the General Fund will decrease by$112,000 with an equal increase in program expenditures for the Water Fund.Also,program expenditures in Sanitary Sewer will decrease by$42,070 with an equal increase in Public Works program expenditures within the Stormwater Fund. Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,156,853 $ 8,156,853 Property Taxes $ 13,020,535 $ 13,020,535 Franchise Fees S 5,601,40(1 $ 5,601,400 Licenses&Permits S 900,135 S 900,135 Intergovernmental $ 5,617,904 $ 5,617,904 Charges for Services $ 3,230,653 $ 3,230,653 Fines&Forfeitures $ 1,098,783 $ 1,098,783 Interest Earnings S 103,722 S 103,722 Miscellaneous S 73,754 $ 73,754 Other Financing Sources $ 361,000 $ 361,000 Transfers In from Other Funds ; $ - Requirements Policy and Administration $ 802,516 $ 802,516 Community Development S 3,015,448 $ 3,015,448 Community Services $ 20,136,393 $ 20,136,393 Public Works S 5,477,765 $ (112,000) S 5,365,765 Program Expenditures Total $ 29,432,122 $ (112,000) $ 29,320,122 Debt Service S - S - Loans $ 361,00(1 $ 361,000 Work-In-Progress S - S - Transfers to Other Funds S 916,292 $ 916,292 Contingency S 1,192,780 S 1,192,780 Total Budget $ 31,902,194 $ (112,000) $ 31,790,194 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,262,545 $ 112,000 $ 6,374,545 Total Requirements $ 38,164,739 $ - $ 38,164,739 Exhibit A 2.Public Works-Reallocation of payroll expenses A request is being made to move the payroll for the city's Project Director for the Lake Oswego/Tigard Water Partnership from the General Fund to the Water Fund;effective 10/31/13.In addition,a Sr.Utility Worker's payroll is currently being funded 50-50 in both Stormwater and Sanitary Sewer.Due to the nature of work of this position,payroll should be funded 100"'o in Stormwater.As a result of these actions,program expenditures for Public Works in the General Fund will decrease by 8112,000 with an equal increase in program expenditures for the Water Fund.Also,program expenditures in Sanitary Sewer will decrease by$42,070 with an equal increase in Public Works program expenditures within the Stormwater Fund. Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Water Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 9,701,503 $ 9,701,503 Licenses&Permits S 13,202 $ 13,202 Charges for Services S 14,240,169 S 14,240,169 Interest Earnings S 30,644 $ 30,644 Transfers In from Other Funds c 58,'51 S 55,751 Total Resources $ 24,044,269 $ - $ 24,044,269 Requirements Public Works S 8,239,852 S 112,000 $ 8,351,852 Program Expenditures Total $ 8,239,852 $ 112,000 $ 8,351,852 Transfers to Other Funds S 5,785,926 8 5,785,926 Contingency $ 350,000 S (112,000) $ 238,000 Total Budget $ 14,375,778 $ - $ 14,375,778 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 9,668,491 $ - $ 9,668,491 Total Requirements S 24,044,269 5 - 5 24,044,269 Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Sanitary Sewer Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 6,197,119 $ 6,197,119 Licenses&Permits S 433,800 S 433,800 Charges for Services S 1,484,277 $ 1,484,277 Interest Earnings S 100,333 $ 100,333 Miscellaneous 5 128,788 S 128,788 Transfers In from Other Funds s 15 1l ono ", 1,391 000 Total Resources $ 9,735,317 $ - $ 9,7 Requirements Public Works S 1,973,373 S (42,070) $ 1,931,303 Program Expenditures Total $ 1,973,373 $ (42,070) $ 1,931,303 Work-In-Progress S 5,924,653 S 5,924,653 Transfers to Other Funds $ 230,149 S 230,149 Contingency S 220,000 $ 220,000 Total Budget $ 8,348,175 $ (42,070) $ 8,306,105 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 1,387,142 $ 42,070 $ 1,429,212 Total Requirements $ 9,735,317 $ - S 9,735,317 Exhibit A 2.Public Works-Reallocation of payroll expenses A request is being made to move the payroll for the city's Project Director for the Lake Oswego/Tigard Water Partnership from the General Fund to the Water Fund;effective 10/31/13.In addition,a Sr.Utility Worker's payroll is currently bring funded 50-50 in both Stormwater and Sanitary Sewer.Due to the nature of work of this position,payroll should be funded 100"i,in Stormwater.As a result of these actions,program expenditures for Public Works in the General Fund will decrease by 5112,0(X)with an equal increase in program expenditures for the Water Fund.Also,program expenditures in Sanitary Sewer will decrease by$42,070 with an equal increase in Public Works program expenditures within the Stormwater Fund. Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Stormwater Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 2,516,647 $ 2,516,647 Charges for Services S 2,1)53,830 S 2,053,830 Interest Earning, 7.936 . '!)36 "Total Resources $ 4,578,413 $ - $ 4,578,413 Requirements Public Works 1,442,387 S 42,070 $ 1,454,457 Program Expenditures Total $ 1,442,387 $ 42,070 $ 1,484,457 Work-In-Progress $ 1,165,375 $ 1,165,375 Transfers to Other Funds 5 598,916 $ 598,916 Contingency S 100,t)00 S (42,070) S 57,930 Total Budget $ 3,306,678 $ - $ 3,306,678 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 1,271,735 $ - $ 1,271,735 Total Requirement, $ 4,578,413 $ - 5 4,578,413 Exhibit A 3.Police-Grant Recognition The city has received a total of 523,081 in grant funding to be recognized by council. Two grants in the amount of$18,481 have been received that will reimburse the city for police overtime relating to work done for the Internal Revenue Service taskforce for$10,000,and another in the amount of$8,481 for overtime reimbursement at Washington Square Mall during the holiday season.Additionally,a grant in the amount of$4,600 from Homeland Security was obtained to purchase a police radio.This action will result in an increase in intergovernmental revenues by $23,080 with an equal increase in program expenditures for Police. Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,156,853 $ 8,156,853 Property Taxes S 13,020,535 S 13,020,535 Franchise Fees S 5,601,410 $ 5,601,400 Licenses&Permits S 900,135 S 910,135 Intergovernmental S 5,617,904 $ 23,081 $ 5,640,985 Charges for Services $ 3,230,653 $ 3,230,653 Fines&Forfeitures $ 1,098,783 $ 1,098,783 Interest Earnings $ 103,722 S 103,722 Miscellaneous S 73,754 S 73,754 Other Financing Sources $ 361,000 S 361,000 Transfers In from Other Funds S - S - Total Resources $ 38,164,739 $ 23,081 $ 38,187,820 Requirements Policy and Administration $ 802,516 S 802,516 Community Development $ 3,015,448 $ 3,015,448 Community Services $ 20,136,393 S 23,081 S 20,159,474 Public Works S 5,477,765 S 5,477,765 Program Expenditures Total $ 29,432,122 $ 23,081 $ 29,455,203 Debt Service S - S - Loans S 361,0(N) S 361,0(0 Work-In-Progress $ - S - Transfers to Other Funds 5 916,292 S 916,292 Contingency S 1,192,780 $ 1,192,780 Total Budget $ 31,902,194 $ 23,081 $ 31,925,275 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,262,545 $ - $ 6,262,545 Total Requirements $ 38,164,739 $ 23,081 $ 38,187,820 Exhibit A 4.Capital Improvement Program(CIP) CIP Funding Reallocations-Parks A total of$463,0811 in project funding is being reallocated for three projects:Dirksen Nature Park for$144,240; Jack Park for$261,840;and Summer Lake Restroom for$57,000.The reallocation of these funds to Park SDC as well as General Fund will maximize the use of Park Bond funds(See Exhibit B). This action will result in a decrease in transfers for Parks Bond.Park SDC will see a increase in Licenses and Permits revenue of$406,0811 with an equal increase in transfers.General Fund transfers will increase with an decrease in contingency of$57,000. Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,156,853 $ 8,156,853 Property Taxes S 13,020,535 $ 13,020,535 Franchise Fees $ 5,601,400 S 5,601,400 licenses&Permits S 900,135 S 900,135 Intergovernmental S 5,617,904 $ 5,617,904 Charges for Services $ 3,230,653 $ 3,230,653 Fines&Forfeitures S 1,098,783 $ 1,098,783 Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ 103,722 Miscellaneous $ 73,754 $ 73,754 Other Financing Sources S 361,000 $ 361,000 Transfers In from Other Funds S - S - Total Resources $ 38,164,739 $ - $ 38,164,739 Requirements Policy and Administration $ 802,516 $ 802,516 Community Development $ 3,015,448 S 3,015,448 Community Services S 20,136,393 S 20,136,393 Public Works $ 5,477,765 S 5,477,765 Program Expenditures Total $ 29,432,122 $ - $ 29,432,122 Debt Service S - $ - Loans S 361,000 $ 361,000 Work-In-Progress S - S - 'I'ransfers to Other Funds $ 916,292 $ 57,00(1 S 973,292 Contingency S 1,192,780 $ (57,0011) $ 1,135,780 Total Budget $ 31,902,194 $ - $ 31,902,194 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,262,545 $ - $ 6,262,545 Total Re,uirements $ 38 164,739 $ - $ 38 164 739 Exhibit A 4.Capital Improvement Program(CIP) CIP Funding Reallocations-Parks A total of$463,080 in project funding is being reallocated for three projects:Dirksen Nature Park for$144,240; Jack Park for$261,840;and Summer Lake Restroom for 557,000.The reallocation of these funds to Park SDC as well as General Fund will maximize the use of Park Bond funds(See Exhibit B). This action will result in a decrease in transfers for Parks Bond.Park SDC will see a increase in Licenses and Permits revenue of$406,080 with an equal increase in transfers.General Fund transfers will increase with an decrease in contingency of$57,000. Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks Bond Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 4,872,068 $ 4,872,068 Interest Earnings S 4,020 $ 4,020 Total Resources $ 4,876,088 $ - $ 4,876,088 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds $ 4,876,088 5 (463,080) 5 4,413,008 Total Budget $ 4,876,088 $ (463,080) $ 4,413,008 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ - $ 463,080 $ 463,080 Total Requirements $ 4,876,088 $ - $ 4,876,088 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks SDC Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,873,432 $ 1,873,432 Licenses&Permits S 257,825 $ 406,080 $ 663,905 Interest Earnin s $ 19782 $ 19782 j otal Resources $ 2, Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds $ 2,065,(05 S 406,080 $ 2,471,085 Contingency $ 75,00 $ 75,000 Total Budget $ 2,140,005 $ 406,080 $ 2,546,085 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 11,034 $ - $ 11,034 Total Requirements $ 2,151,039 $ 406,080 $ 2,557,119 Exhibit A 5.Capital Improvement Program(CIP) CIP Funding Reallocations-Transportation A total of 5725,0511 will be reallocated from Gas Tax to Transportation Development Tax funds for the 72nd Ave./Dartmouth Street Intersection Improvement at$610,050;and$115,000 for the Upper Boones Ferry Road/Durham Road Adaptive Signal Coordination projects.These funding reallocations will maximize the use of Gas Tax revenues.As a result,transfers in Gas Tax will decrease by$725,050.The budget for beginning fund balance in Transportation Development Tax Fund will increase by a total of$725,050 with an equal increase in transfers-out. Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Gas Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,526,663 $ 1,526,663 Licenses&Permits S 2,602 S 2,602 Intergovernmental 5 3,746,852 S 3,746,852 Interest Earnings S 55,732 S 55,732 Miscellaneous S 60,297 S 60,297 Transfers In from Other Fund- $ 100,0011 100,011 Total Resources $ 5,492,146 $ - $ 5,492,146 Requirements Public Works S 2,244,iuri S 2,244,308 Program Expenditures Total $ 2,244,308 $ - $ 2,244,308 Debt Service S 606,378 $ 606,378 Transfers to Other Funds $ 2,604,452 $ (725,050) S 1,879,402 Contingence S 35,00(1 S 35,000 'Iota)Budget $ 5,490,138 $ (725,050) $ 4,765,088 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 2,008 $ 725,050 $ 727,058 Total Requirements $ 5,492,146 $ - $ 5,492,146 Exhibit A 5.Capital Improvement Program(CIP) CIP Funding Reallocations-Transportation A total of 5725,1150 will be reallocated from Gas Tax to Transportation Development Tax funds for the 72nd Ave./Dartmouth Street Intersection Improvement at$610,050;and$115,000 for the Upper Boones Ferry Road/Durham Road Adaptive Signal Coordination projects.These funding reallocations will maximize the use of Gas Tax revenues.As a result,transfers in Gas Tax will decrease by$725,050.The budget for beginning fund balance in Transportation Development Tax Fund will increase by a total of$725,050 with an equal increase in transfers-out. Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Transportation Development Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 894,189 $ 725,050 $ 1,619,239 Licenses&Permits S 176,678 $ 176,678 � Interest Earnings S 11,279 S 11,279 Total Resources S 1,082,146 $ 725,050 $ 1,807,196 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - "Transfers to Other Funds S 779,724 5 725,050 S 1,504,774 Contingency S 250,18)0 S 250,000 Total Budget $ 1,029,724 S 725,050 $ 1,754,774 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 52,422 $ - $ 52,422 Total Requirements $ 1,082,146 $ 725,050 $ 1,807,196 Exhibit A 6.Capital Improvement Program-Bull Mountain Park In July 2013,the city purchased 10.2 acres for development of a neighborhood park. An additional appropriation of$39,630 is being requested for development of a site master plan. With this action is a decrease in contingency in Park SDC by$39,630 with an increase in transfers. In addition,program expenditures will increase by the same amount in the Parks Capital Fund. Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks SDC Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,873,432 $ 1,873,432 Licenses&Permits S 257,825 S 257,825 Interest Earnings S 19,782 5 19,782 Total Resources $ 2,151,039 $ - $ 2,151,0315 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - 'transfers to Other Funds 5 2,065,005 $ 39,630 $ 2,104,635 Contingency $ 75,000 $ (39,630) S 35,370 Total Budget $ 2,140,005 $ - $ 2,140,005 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 11,034 $ - $ 11,034 Total Requirements $ 2,151,039 $ - $ 2,151,039 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks Capital Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 139,479 $ 139,479 Intergovernmental S 163,074 S 163,074 Interest Earnings S 3,015 S 3,015 Transfers In from Other Funds S 7,471,573 S 39,630 S 7,511,203 Total Resources $ 7 777 141 $ 39,630 $ 7 816 771 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress $ 7,634,647 S 39,630 $ 7,674,277 Transfers to Other Funds S 1(N),397 S 100,397 Total Budget $ 7,735,044 $ 39,630 $ 7,774,674 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 42,097 $ - $ 42,097 Total Re.uirements $ 7,777 141 $ 39,630 $ 7,816,771 Exhibit A 7.Capital Improvement Program-Pavement Management Program A request is being made for additional appropriation to comply with requirements concerning curb ramps as mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA).The fund will show a decrease in contingency in Street Maintenance Fee Fund of 565,0(X)with an equal increase in capital program expenditures. Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Street Maintenance Fee Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,106,917 $ 1,106,917 Licenses&Permits S 1,941,234 S 1,941,234 Interest Earnings S 2,043 S 2,043 Total Resources $ 3,050,194 5 - $ 3,050,194 Requirements Policy and Administration S - Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress S 1,660,(XX) $ 65,(1X) $ 1,725,0(X) Transfers to Other Funds $ 208,883 $ 208,883 Contingency S 2(0,000 S (65,(10) S 135,000 Total Budget $ 2,068,883 $ - $ 2,068,883 Re senve For Future Expenditure $ 981,311 $ - $ 981,311 Total Requirements $ 3,050,194 $ - $ 3,050,194 Exhibit A 8.Capital Improvement Program(CIP)-Main Street Green Street:Phase 1 A request for additional appropriation is being made for legal fees related to right-of-way as well as the close out of two property files.This action will result in a increase in transfers-out in Gas Tax by$70,000.Transportation CiP will see an increase in transfers-in with a increase in capital program expenditures.The Gas Tax Fund will have the ability to pay for this action item once the movement of project funding from Gas Tax to Transportation Development Tax Fund is completed(See Item#5). Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Gas Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,526,663 $ 1,526,663 Licenses&Permits S 2,602 S 2,602 Intergovernmental S 3,746,852 S 3,746,852 Interest Earnings $ 55,732 S 55,732 Miscellaneous $ 60,297 S 60,297 Transfers In from Other Funds $ 100(H10 $ 100 000 Total Resources $ 5 44 $ Requirements Public Works $ 2,244,308 $ 2,244,308 Program Expenditures Total $ 2,244,308 $ - $ 2,244,308 Debt Service S 606,378 $ 606,378 Transfers to Other Funds S 1,879,4112 $ 70,000 S 1,949,402 Contingency S 35,001) S 35,001 Total Budget $ 4,765,088 $ 70,000 $ 4,835,088 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 727,058 $ (70,000) $ 657,058 Total Re.uirements $ 5 492,146 $ - $ 5 492 146 Exhibit A 8.Capital Improvement Program(CIP)-Main Street Green Street Phase 1 A request for additional appropriation is being made for legal fees related to right-of-way as well as the close out of two property files.This action will result in a increase in transfers-out in Gas Tax by$70,000.Transportation CIP will see an increase in transfers-in with a increase in capital program expenditures.The Gas Tax Fund will have the ability to pay for this action item once the movement of project funding from Gas Tax to Transportation Development Tax Fund is completed(See Ilem#5). Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Transportation CIP Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 200,369 $ 200,369 bran.kcrs In from Othcr funds _ ,,c,--pNI S 5,747,U81 Total Resources $ 5,877,450 $ 70,000 $ 5,947,450 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress S 5,677,081 $ 70,000 $ 5,747,081 Total Budget $ 5,677,081 $ 70,000 $ 5,747,081 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 200,369 $ - $ 200,369 Total Re uirements $ 5 877 450 $ 70,000 $ 5,947,450 Exhibit B 92016- Dirksen Nature Park The city has acquired land for the development of a community park.Within the park,natural areals will be preserved and enhanced,and a ball field and interpretive center will be constructed.The development plan will be phased in with the construction plan to include restroom and shelter,parking lot,and educational center upgrades. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Land/ROW - - - - Design and Engineering 500,000 - 500,000 - 500,000 Total 500,000 - 500,000 - 500,000 Internal Expenses Project Management 56,599 - 56,599 - 56,599 Design and Engineering - - - - - Construction Management - - - - - Public Involvement - - - - - Total 56,599 - 56,599 - 56,599 Total Project Expense 556,599 - 556,599 - 556,599 Revenue Funding Source Parks Bond 556,599 (144,240) 412,359 - 412,359 Parks SDC - 144,240 144,240 - 144,240 Total Project Revenues 556,599 - 556,599 - 556,599 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - Exhibit B 92022-Jack Park This project will improve the addition of Jack Park that was purchased in 2008.Phase 1 that is to be completed in 2013-14,includes construction of the bridge and trail to allow access to Jack Park from the new city property as well as the existing parking lot next to Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVFR)Station 50.Phase 2 will include a play structure and community gardens on the addition in the future. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Construction 330,855 87,147 418,002 - 418,002 Design and Engineering - - - - - Public Involvement - - - - - Total 330,855 87,147 418,002 - 418,002 Internal Expenses Project Management 31,900 (4,900) 27,000 - 27,000 Construction Management 31,900 (4,900) 27,000 - 27,000 Total 63,800 (9,800) 54,000 - 54,000 Total Project Expense 394,655 77,347 472,002 - 472,002 Revenue Funding Source Parks Bond 394,655 (261,840) 132,815 - 132,815 Parks SDC - 261,840 261,840 - 261,840 Total Project Revenues 394,655 - 394,655 - 394,655 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - Exhibit B 92048- Summer Lake Restroom Improvements The project will install a prefabricated restroom matching similar installations in other parks.The restroom will be constructed on a concrete slab that will connect to existing sanitary sewer and water lines. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Construction 60,000 - 60,000 - 60,000 Design and Engineering 40,000 - 40,000 - 40,000 Public Involvement - - - - - Total 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 Internal Expenses Project Management 20,000 - 20,000 - 20,000 Construction Management 20,000 - 20,000 - 20,000 Total 40,000 - 40,000 - 40,000 Total Project Expense 140,000 - 140,000 - 140,000 Revenue Funding Source Parks SDC - - - - - Parks Bond 140,000 (57,000) 83,000 - 83,000 General Fund' - 57,000 57,000 - 57,000 Total Project Revenues 140,000 - 140,000 - 140,000 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - - *Project is not Parks SDC eligible. Exhibit B 95035-72nd Ave./Dartmouth St. Intersection Improvements This project will improve the level-of-service(LOS) and a short section of 72nd Avenue to five lanes with sidewalks and street trees. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Construction 1,723,500 - 1,723,500 1,289,350 3,012,850 Design and Engineering - - - - - Land/ROW 450,000 - 450,000 - 450,000 Construction Management - - - 190,000 190,000 Total 2,173,500 - 2,173,500 1,479,350 3,652,850 Internal Expenses Project Management 60,950 - 60,950 41,000 101,950 Construction Management 60,950 - 60,950 41,000 101,950 Total 121,900 - 121,900 82,000 203,900 Total Project Expense 2,295,400 - 2,295,400 1,561,350 3,856,750 Revenue Funding Source City Gas Tax 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 733,125 1,733,125 Underground Utility 150,000 - 150,000 113,682 263,682 Traffic Impact Fee 520,000 - 520,000 277,366 797,366 Transportation Development Tax 15,350 610,050 625,400 437,177 1,062,577 ' Gas Tax* 610,050 (610,050) - - - Total Project Revenues 2,295,400 - 2,295,400 1,561,350 3,856,750 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - - *Reallocated$610,050 from Gas Tax to TDT. Exhibit B 95041-Upper Boones Ferry Rd/Durham Adaptive Signal Coordination This project involves the installation of adaptive traffic signal control system connecting several intersections along Upper Boones Ferry Road and Durham Road from Interstate 5 to near Tigard High School.The signal operates according to traffic demands. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Design and Engineering 65,000 - 65,000 - 65,000 Construction - - - - - Total 65,000 - 65,000 - 65,000 Internal Expenses Project Management 25,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 Construction Management 25,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 Total 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 Total Project Expense 115,000 - 115,000 - 115,000 Revenue Funding Source Transportation Development Tax - 115,000 115,000 - 115,000 Gas Tax* 115,000 (115,000) - - - Total Project Revenues 115,000 - 115,000 - 115,000 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - - *fteallocated$115,000 from Gas Tax to TUT. Exhibit B 92031- Bull Mountain Park The city purchased the 10 acre East Bull Mountain properties in the Spring of 2012 for a neighborhood park. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Design and Engineering 10,000 7,400 17,400 - 17,400 Construction - 28,830 28,830 - 28,830 Total 10,000 36,230 46,230 - 46,230 Internal Expenses Project Management - 3,400 3,400 - 3,400 Total - 3,400 3,400 - 3,400 Total Project Expense 10,000 39,630 49,630 - 49,630 Revenue Funding Source Parks Bond 10,000 - 10,000 - 10,000 Park SDC - 39,630 39,630 - 39,630 Total Project Revenues 10,000 39,630 49,630 - 49,630 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - - Exhibit B 95001- Pavement Management Program This program that is funded by the Street Maintenance Fee consists of pavement overlays,crack seals and slurry seals on various streets throughout the city in order to preserve the city's investment in the existing street surface. Crack seals are planned for Spring.Pavement overlays and slurry seals are planned for Summer. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Design and Engineering 40,000 - 40,000 - 40,000 Construction 1,380,000 65,000 1,445,000 - 1,445,000 Public Involvement 10,000 - 10,000 - 10,000 Total 1,430,000 65,000 1,495,000 - 1,495,000 Internal Expenses Project Management 80,000 - 80,000 - 80,000 Construction Management 150,000 - 150,000 - 150,000 Total 230,000 - 230,000 - 230,000 Total Project Expense 1,660,000 65,000 1,725,000 - 1,725,000 Revenue Funding Source Street Maintenance Fee 1,660,000 65,000 1,725,000 - 1,725,000 Total Project Revenues 1,660,000 65,000 1,725,000 - 1,725,000 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - - Exhibit B 97003-Main St.Green St. Retrofit The Main Street project is a multi-year project including comprehensive redesign and construction of the full length of Main Street.The project is divided into 2 phases:Phase 1 starts at the railroad tracks and proceeds south to Pacific Highway.Phase 1,which is funded throught the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP)is to reconstruct the street in accordance wth Green Street Standards for 1400 lineal feet of Main Street. It encompasses the entire public right-of-way (ROW) and includes streets,curbs,sidewalks,landscape and drainage improvements. Design will be based on concept plans as approved in the Downtown Streetscape Plan. Original New Budget Projected Budget 2014 This change 2014 2015 Total External Expenses Construction 1,089,492 - 1,089,492 - 1,089,492 Design and Engineering 25,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 Land/ROW - 70,000 70,000 - 70,000 Total 1,114,492 70,000 1,184,492 - 1,184,492 Internal Expenses Project l'vlanagement 30,000 - 30,000 - 30,000 Construction Management - - - - - Total 30,000 - 30,000 - 30,000 Total Project Expense 1,144,492 70,000 1,214,492 - 1,214,492 Revenue Funding Source Gas Tax 950,868 70,000 1,020,868 - 1,020,868 Water 193,624 - 193,624 - 193,624 Total Project Revenues 1,144,492 70,000 1,214,492 - 1,214,492 Other Revenue Source Total Other Revenues - - - - - FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Revised Adopted Q3 Revised Budget Amendment Budget Affected City Funds Resources Beginning Fund Balance $17,663,053 $ 725,050 $18,388,103 Property Taxes $13,020,535 $ - $13,020,535 Franchise Fees $ 5,601,400 $ - S 5,601,400 Special Assessments S - S - S - Licenses&Permits $ 1,337,240 S 406,080 S 1,743,320 Intergovernmental $ 9,527,830 S 268,081 S 9,795,911 Charges for Services $ 3,230,653 $ - S 3,230,653 Fines&Forfeitures $ 1,098,783 $ - S 1,098,783 Interest Earnings 5 197,550 S - S 197,550 Miscellaneous $ 134,051 S - $ 134,051 Other Financing Sources S 361,000 $ - $ 361,000 "Transfers In from Other Funds S 13,198,654 S 109,630 S 13,308,284 Total Resources $65,370,749 $ 1,508,841 $66,879,590 Requirements Policy and Administration S 802,516 S - S 802,516 Community Development S 3,015,448 5 245,000 S 3,260,448 Community Services S 20,136,393 S 23,081 S 20,159,474 Public Works S 7,722,073 S - S 7,722,073 Program Expenditures Total $31,676,430 $ 268,081 $31,944,511 Debt Service $ 606,378 S - S 606,378 Loans S 361,000 S - S 361,000 Work-In-Progress S 13,261,728 S 174,630 S 13,436,358 Transfers to Other Funds S 11,341,958 $ 109,630 $11,451,588 Contingency S 1,552,780 S (315,700) S 1,237,080 Total Budget $58,800,274 $ 236,641 $59,036,915 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,570,475 $ 1,272,200 $ 7,842,675 Total Re uirements $65,370,749 $ 1,508,841 $66,879,590 1 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items: 1,2,3,4 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget General Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,156,853 S - $ 8,156,853 Property Taxes $13,020,535 $ - S 13,020,535 Franchise Fees $ 5,601,400 S - $ 5,601,400 Special Assessments S - S - S - Licenses&Permits S 900,135 S - S 900,135 Intergovernmental S 5,617,904 S 268,081 S 5,885,985 Charges for Services $ 3,230,653 S - S 3,230,653 Fines&Forfeitures S 1,098,783 S - S 1,098,783 Interest Earnings S 103,722 $ - S 103,722 Miscellaneous S 73,754 S - S 73,754 Other Financing Sources $ 361,000 S - S 361,000 Transfers In from Other Funds S - S - S - Total Resources $38,164,739 $ 268,081 $38,432,82O, Requirements Policy and Administration S 802,516 S - $ 802,516 Community Development S 3,015,448 S 245,000 $ 3,260,448 Community Services S 20,136,393 S 23,081 $ 20,159,474 Public Works S 5,477,765 S (112,000) $ 5,365,765 Program Expenditures Total $29,432,122 $ 156,081 $29,588,203 Debt Service S - S - S - Loans S 361,000 S - $ 361,000 Transfers to Other Funds* S 916,292 S 57,000 S 973,292 Contingency* $ 1,192,780 S (57,000) S 1,135,780 Total Budget $31,902,194 $ 156,081 $32,058,275 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 6,262,545 $ 112,000 $ 6,374,545 Total Re•uirements $38,164,739 $ 268,081 $38 432,820 OF contribution of$57,000 for Summerfield Pork Restroom. 2 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:4 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks Bond Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $4,872,068 $ - $4,872,068 Interest Earnings S 4,020 S - S 4,020 Total Resources $4,876,088 $ - $4,876,088 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - "Transfers to Other Funds S 4,876,088 S (463,080) S 4,413,008 Total Budget $4,876,088 $ (463,080) $4,413,008 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ - $ 463,080 $ 463,080 Total Re•uirements $4,876,088 $ - $4,876,088 3 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:4,6 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks SDC Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $1,873,432 $ - $1,873,432 Licenses&Permits S 257,825 S 406,080 $ 663,905 Interest Earnings S 19,782 S - S 19,782 Total Resources $2,151,039 $ 406,080 $ZS 7 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds $2,065,005 S 445,710 S 2,510,715 Contingency S 75,000 S (39,630) S 35,370 Total Budget $2,140,005 $ 406,080 $2,546,085 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 11,034 $ - $ 11,034 Total Requirements $2,151,039 $ 406,080 $2,557,119 4 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:6 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Parks Capital Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 139,479 S - $ 139,479 Intergovernmental S 163,074 S - $ 163,074 Interest Earnings S 3,015 S - S 3,015 Transfers In from Other Funds S 7,421,573 S 39,630 S 7,461,203 Total Resources $7,727,141 $ 39,630 $ 7,766,771 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress $7,584,647 $ 39,630 S 7,624,277 Transfers to Other Funds S 100,397 $ - S 100,397 Total Budget $7,685,044 $ 39,630 $ 7,724,674 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 42,097 $ - $ 42,097 Total Requirements $7,727,141 $ 39,630 $ 7,766,771 5„ FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items: 5,8 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Gas Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $1,526,663 $ - $1,526,663 Licenses&Permits $ 2,602 $ - $ 2,602 Intergovernmental S 3,746,852 $ - $3,746,852 Interest Earnings S 55,732 S - S 55,732 Miscellaneous S 60,297 S - S 60,297 Transfers In from Other Funds $ 100,001) • S 100,000 Total Resources $5,492,146 $ - $5,492,146 Requirements Public Works S 2,244,308 S - $2,244,308 Program Expenditures Total $2,244,308 $ - $2,244,308 Debt Service $ 606,378 $ - $ 606,378 Transfers to Other Funds S 2,604,452 S (655,050) $1,949,402 Contingency $ 35,000 S - $ 35,000 Total Budget $5,490,138 $ (655,050) $4,835,088 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 2,008 $ 655,050 $ 657,058 Total Requirements $5,492,146 $ - $5,492,146 6 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:5 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Transportation Development Tax Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 894,189 $ 725,050 $1,619,239 Licenses&Permits S 176,678 $ - S 176,678 Interest Earnings S 11,279 S - S 11,279 Total Resources $1,082,146 $ 725,050 $1,807,196 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Transfers to Other Funds $ 779,724 $ 725,050 $1,504,774 Contingency $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 Total Budget $1,029,724 $ 725,050 $1,754,774 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 52,422 $ - $ 52,422 Total Requirements $1,082,146 S 725,050 S1,807,196 7 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-I Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:8 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Transportation CIP Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 200,369 $ - $ 200,369 Transfers In from Other Funds S 1,677,081 S 70,000 S�, -� (�S I Total Resources $5,877,450 $ 70,000 $5,947,450 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress S 5,677,081 S 70,000 S 5,747,081 Total Budget $5,677,081 $ 70,000 $5,747,081 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 200,369 $ - $ 200,369 Total Requirements $5,877,450 $ 70,000 $5,947,450 8 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:7 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Street Maintenance Fee Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $1,106,917 $ - $1,106,917 Licenses&Permits S 1,941,234 S - S 1,941,234 Charges for Services S - S - S - Interest Earnings S 2,043 $ - S 2,043 Total Resources $3,050,194 $ - $3,050,194 Requirements Program Expenditures Total $ - $ - $ - Work-In-Progress S 1,660,000 S 65,000 S 1,725,000 Transfers to Other Funds S 208,883 S - S 208,883 Contingency S 200,000 $ (65,000) S 135,000 Total Budget $2,068,883 $ - $2,068,883 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 981,311 $ - $ 981,311 Total Re•uirements $3,050,194 $ - $3,050,194 9 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:2 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Sanitary Sewer Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $6,197,119 $ - $6,197,119 Licenses&Permits $ 433,800 $ - $ 433,800 Charges for Services S 1,484,277 S - S 1,484,277 Interest Earnings S 100,333 S - $ 100,333 Miscellaneous S 128,788 S - S 128,788 Transfers In from Other Ivnds S 1,391,000 S - S 1,391,000 Total Resources $9,735,317 $ - smomir Requirements Public Works S 1,973,373 S (42,070) $1,931,303 Program Expenditures Total $1,973,373 $ (42,070) $1,931,303 Work-In-Progress S 5,924,653 $ - $5,924,653 Transfers to Other Funds S 230,149 S - $ 230,149 Contingency S 220,000 S - S 220,000 Total Budget $8,348,175 $ (42,070) $8,306,105 Reserve For Future Expenditure $1,387,142 $ 42,070 $1,429,212 Total Requirements $9,735,317 $ - $9,735,317 10 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:2 Revised Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Stormwater Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $2,516,647 $ - $2,516,647 Charges for Services S 2,053,830 S - S 2,053,830 Interest Earnings S 7,936 S - S 7,936 Total Resources $4,578,413 $ - $4,578,413 Requirements Public Works S 1,442,387 S 42,070 S 1,484,457 Program Expenditures Total $1,442,387 $ 42,070 $1,484,457 Work-In-Progress $1,165,375 $ - $1,165,375 'Transfers to Other Funds $ 598,916 $ - $ 598,916 Contingency S 100,000 S (42,070) $ 57,930 Total Budget $3,306,678 $ - $3,306,678 Reserve For Future Expenditure $1,271,735 $ - $1,271,735 Total Re•uirements $4,578,413 $ - $4,578,413 11 of 12 FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Attachment-1 Summary of Budget Changes Reference Budget Items:2 Q3 Adopted Revised Budget Amendment Budget Water Fund Resources Beginning Fund Balance $ 9,701,503 $ - $ 9,701,503 licenses&Permits S 13,202 S - $ 13,202 Charges for Services S 14,240,169 S - $14,240,169 Interest Earnings S 30,644 S - S 30,644 Transfers In from Other Funds S 58,751 $ - S 58,751 Total Resources $24,044,264 $ - 82$,044,269 Requirements Public Works S 8,239,852 $ 112,000 S 8,351,852 Program Expenditures Total $ 8,239,852 $ 112,000 $ 8,351,852 Transfers to Other Funds $ 5,785,926 S - S 5,785,926 Contingency S 350,000 S (112,000) S 238,000 Total Budget $14,375,778 $ - $14,375,778 Reserve For Future Expenditure $ 9,668,491 $ - $ 9,668,491 Total Re'uirements $24,044,269 $ - $24,044,269 12 of 12 AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: April 22, 2014 INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before the City Center Development Agency (CCDA) on: CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FY 2014 TO ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING: RECOGNITION OF GRANT REVENUES AND EXPENSES, ALONG WITH BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS IN PUBLIC WORKS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY SERVICES, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose a Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: April 22, 2014 PLEASE PRINT Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. (.2\u) r� �q Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. it AIS-1728 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Supplemental Budget Amendment to FY 2014 City Center Development Agency Adopted Budget Prepared For: Toby LaFrance Submitted By: Carissa Collins,Financial and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: City Center Resolution Development Public Hearing-Informational Agency Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication 04/09/2014 Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE A third quarter supplemental amendment to the FY 2014 Adopted Budget for the City Center Development Agency (CCDA) is requested. The purpose of the supplemental is to account for revenues and expenses that were unknown at the time of budget adoption. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve the FY 2014 Third Quarter Supplemental Budget Amendment for the City Center Development Agency. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY This amendment recognizes a$100,000 Metro construction excise tax grant to be used to fund a pre-development feasibility study for a mixed-use development at the Public Works Yard as well as another site in the downtown area. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the supplemental budget amendment. COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Financial Stability DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION N/,\ Fiscal Impact Cost: $100,000 Budgeted (yes or no): No Where Budgeted (department/program): CCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: The city received a$100,000 Metro construction excise tax grant to be used to conduct a pre-development feasibility study for a mixed use development at the Public Works Yard along with another site located in downtown.There is no impact on fund balance with this action item. Attachments Resolution Exhibit-A AGENDA ITEM No. 8 Date: April 22, 2014 INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before the City Center Development Agency (CCDA) on: CONSIDER A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FY 2014 TO ACHIEVE THE FOLLOWING: RECOGNITION OF GRANT REVENUE WITHIN THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CCDA) Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose a Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 8 Date: April 22, 2014 PLEASE PRINT Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. 0'4'4.a V l Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. I Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. AIS-1748 9. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider a Revised Resolution Granting Exemption from Property Taxes Under TMC 3.50 for Five Non-Profit Low Income Housing Projects Prepared For: Toby LaFrance,Financial and Information Services Submitted By: Carissa Coffins,Financial and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting Resolution -Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Should council consider approving a new resolution to replace Resolution 14-15 approved on March 25,2014? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve the new resolution superseding Res.14-15. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 25,2014,council approved Resolution 14-15 which grants property tax exemption status to Village at Washington Square,single family house located at 9330 SW Tangela Court,Greenburg Oaks,The Knoll, and Hawthorne Villa.The resolution was submitted to the Washington County's Assessment and Taxation division on April 7,2014. The original resolution stated that Hawthorne Villa did not receive an exemption in the prior year when it actually did. A revised resolution approved by council,is required so that the County Assessor's office can approve the tax exemption status of the five properties. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the new resolution. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION March 25,2014 Attachments Resolution AIS-1725 10. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Extension of Existing Prohibition On Medical Marijuana Facilities Submitted By: John Floyd,Community Development Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting Ordinance -Main Public Hearing-Legislative Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council extend the temporary prohibition on medical marijuana facilities until May 1,2015 in accordance with SB1531? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Adopt the draft ordinance in compliance with SB1531. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On February 11,2014,the Tigard City Council adopted Ordinance 14-04 which established a temporary prohibition on medical marijuana facilities within the City until December 31,2014. More recently,the State Legislature has adopted new requirements for local governments who wish to temporarily prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries (SB 1531).Amongst other changes to the law,the new rules state a moratorium must be adopted by May 1,2014 and must end by May 1,2015. As discussed at the Council Workshop on April 15,the City Attorney's office has advised that Council may want to amend the current ordinance to extend the moratorium until May 1,2015,as it is unclear whether the City would be allowed to extend its moratorium after May 1,2014.Per Council's direction of April 15, staff has prepared a draft ordinance that would extend the City's current ban to the maximum time period authorized under SB1531.The purpose of the extension is to ensure the city has sufficient time to respond to changes in the legal landscape as a result of a November 2014 ballot measure or clarifying legislation in the Spring 2015 state legislative session. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not adopt the draft ordinance and maintain the existing sunset date of December 31,2014. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION February 11,2014 April 15,2014 Attachments Proposed Ordinance Ordinance 14-04 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 14- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON, RELATING TO MEDICAL MARIJUANA FACILITIES;AMENDING CHAPTER 5.24;AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS,the City of Tigard adopted Ordinance 14-04 on February 11,2014 which enacted a temporary moratorium on medical marijuana facilities through December 31,2014;and WHEREAS,during the 2014 Regular Session,the Oregon Legislature passed SB 1531,which limits the ability of cities and counties to regulate medical marijuana facilities to the"reasonable regulations" provided in statute: the hours of operation for medical marijuana facilities,where the facilities may locate within the zones allowed by law,and the manner in which a facility may dispense medical marijuana;and WHEREAS, SB 1531 also allows cities and counties to enact a moratorium on the operation of registered medical marijuana facilities until May 1, 2015, provided the moratorium is enacted no later than May 1,2014;and WHEREAS,the City Council of Tigard wishes to extend its moratorium to have the additional time allowed under SB 1531 to evaluate policy options related to siting medical marijuana facilities. NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Ordinance 14-04, Section 4,is amended to read as follows (additional language italicized, deleted language stricken): Ordinance Automatically Expires. This ordinance automatically expires and is to be deemed repealed at 11:59:59 p.m. on April 30, 2015 Dca-mr347204-4,unless sooner repealed or extended by City Council ordinance. SECTION 2: Emergency. With the statutory deadline of May 1,2014 to enact a moratorium, this ordinance is necessary for the immediate protection of the public health, safety and general welfare;therefore,an emergency is declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective upon the date of its adoption PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only,this clay of ,2014. ORDINANCE No. 14- Page 1 Carol A.Krager,Deputy City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2014. John L.Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 14- Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 14 °Li AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO MEDICAL MARIJUANA FACILITIES; ESTABLISHING NEW TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 5.24;AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS,during the 2013 Special Session, the Oregon Legislature passed HB 3460, which allows for the establishment and licensing of medical marijuana facilities;and WHEREAS,the Oregon Health Authority is charged with formulating administrative rules governing the licensing of medical marijuana facilities and will begin accepting applications for their operation in March,2014;and WHEREAS,the Federal Controlled Substances Act established cannabis (marijuana) as a Schedule I controlled substance, a category reserved for substances with no currently accepted medical uses in the United States,a lack of accepted safety protocols for use under medical supervision,and possessing a high potential for abuse;and WHEREAS,Subsection 18.210.030.A of the Tigard Development Code requires each development and use application to be consistent with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations;and WHEREAS,this conflict between state and federal law creates uncertainty about the authority of cities to regulate medical marijuana facilities within their boundaries and in compliance with both federal and state law;and WHEREAS,City Council desires time to determine the impacts of the rules adopted by the State of Oregon;to gather public input about siting of facilities within the city;understand the potential community impacts;and to consider zoning regulations and policy options related to siting medical marijuana facilities in compliance with state and federal law;and WHEREAS,pursuant to Article XI, section 2 of the Oregon Constitution,the City of Tigard is a"home rule" municipal corporation having the authority that the constitution, statutes,and common law of the United States and this State expressly or implicitly grant or allow over the civil affairs of its City; NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 5.24 is added to Tigard Municipal Code Title 5 to read as follows: ORDINANCE No. 14- ,1.# Page 1 5.24 Medical Marijuana Facilities 5.24.010. Purpose and Intent.The purpose of this Section is to temporarily prohibit medical marijuana facilities licensed by the State of Oregon from operating within the City of Tigard to allow the City Council time to consider and adopt proper zoning or other regulations for medical marijuana facilities. The State of Oregon is set to grant licenses to medical marijuana facilities in March 2014.The City Council finds that March, 2014,is too soon to provide adequate time to consider the issues related to medical marijuana facilities,seek public input,and adopt proper regulations. Therefore, the City Council is implementing this prohibition to provide time to review the State of Oregon's medical marijuana facilities licensing rules and consider the zoning issues related to the impacts of medical marijuana facilities in the City of Tigard. 5.24.020. Definitions. Except where the context specifically requires otherwise,as used in this Chapter,the following words and phrases mean: (A) "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls, for the housing, shelter or enclosure of persons,animals,chattels,or property of any kind. (B) "Location" means any parcel of land,whether vacant or occupied by a building,group of buildings,or accessory buildings,and includes the buildings,structures,yards,open spaces,lot width,and lot area. (C) "Medical marijuana facility" means a medical marijuana facility licensed by the State of Oregon under HB 3460 and/or ORS 475.300-475.346, including future amendments thereto. (D) "Structure" means anything which is built or constructed,an edifice or building of any kind,or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner. 5.24.030.Prohibited Activities. It is unlawful to establish,operate,use,or to cause or permit the establishment,operation,or use of a medical marijuana facility within the City of Tigard. 5.24.040. City Employees Have No Authority to Permit Medical Marijuana Facilities.The use of any building,structure,location,premises,or land for ORDINANCE No. 14- 04 Page 2 a medical marijuana facility is not currently enumerated in the City of Tigard Municipal or Development Codes as a permitted use in any zoning district. Neither the City Manager nor any city employees is authorized to determine or permit the use of any building, structure,location,premises, or land as a medical marijuana facility in any zoning district. 5.24.050. Violations. (A) A person who violates this Chapter commits a civil infraction and shall be subject to a fine of up to$500. Each violation,and each day that a violation continues,constitutes a separate civil infraction. (B)The civil infraction procedures in TMC 1.16 apply to the prosecution of any violation of this Chapter. SECTION 2: Severability. Each section of this ordinance,and any pan thereof,is severable. If any part of this ordinance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: Emergency. With the state set to issue licenses to medical marijuana facilities beginning in March 2014, this ordinance is necessary for the immediate protection of the public peace,health, safety and welfare and shall take effect immediately upon adoption. SECTION 4: Ordinance Automatically Expires.This ordinance automatically expires and is to be deemed repealed at 11:59:59 p.m. on December 31,2014, unless sooner repealed or extended by City Council ordinance. PASSED: By ml&jD l vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this I l ' day of ,2014. ,..0 Catherine Wheatley,City Recorder day of e4 21ltGL ,2014. APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this y �/ D2J64_ John L.t, , ayor ORDINANCE No. 14- (lf Page 3 Approved as to form: tp Attorney 2• ' ' Zo l 4- Date ORDINANCE No. 14-64 Page 4 en d‘,-- y2 e r de re o n 7/-1°1 Y / AIS-1678 Business Meeting Meeting Date: 04/22/2014 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider a Resolution of Necessity Giving the County the Authority to Acquire Property for the Walnut Street Improvement Project. Prepared For: Kim McMillan,Public Works Submitted By: Renee Ferguson,Public Works Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Consider a resolution of necessity giving the county the authority to acquire property for the Walnut Street improvement project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Adopt the resolution. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Walnut Street improvement includes left-turn lanes,sidewalks,bike lanes,planter strips and storm drainage from 116th Avenue to Tiedeman Avenue. The project will also include the construction of a traffic signal at the northern intersection of Walnut Street and 135th Avenue. The project is funded through phase 3d of the county's Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP 3d). In order to construct the improvements,the city acquired right of way,slope easements and temporary construction easements several years ago.The temporary construction easements have expired. County right of way staff will be renegotiating the temporary construction easements,slope easements and additional right of way needed due to minor design changes. The city's standard practice is to negotiate with each individual property owner and purchase the property at the appraised price. However,as a last resort,it is sometimes necessary to acquire rights of way and easements via condemnation. If there is a possibility that condemnation may be required,the federal property acquisition process dictates that a resolution of necessity be adopted before negotiations begin. The city follows the federal process to ensure it will qualify for federal funding opportunities now and in the future. If council adopts the resolution of necessity, the county (or the county's agent) will enter into negotiations with the property owners to buy the required easements and properties,or portions of the properties,at the appraised value. Should negotiations prove unsuccessful, the resolution authorizes the county to proceed with condemnation OTHER ALTERNATIVES The council could choose not to adopt the resolution and direct staff on how to proceed with the needed acquisitions. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Not applicable. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The council was briefed on this resolution of necessity at its March 25,2014,executive session. On April 9,2013,the council authorized the mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement with the county for the Walnut Street improvement project. Under that agreement,the city committed to provide the county with a resolution of necessity so the county could acquire the property for the project. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: The temporary construction easements, slope easements and additional right of way costs are estimated to be $250,000,paid for with the MSTIP funds. ' Attachments Files 1-4,7,9-15,18-26,28-33,331,34 Resolution of Necessity AgendaQulck©2005-2014 Destiny Software Inc.,All Rights Reserved I