Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1995-00010
SD R95 - 00010 Brown / Mildren Design Group - OWNCO HEADQUARTERS CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0010 BROWN - OWNER MILDREN DESIGN GROUP - APPLICANT APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval for a 57, 900 square foot manufacturing / warehouse / office building. Comprehensive Plan: I-L (Light Industrial) . Zone : I-L, (Light Industrial) . Location: (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lot 2100, 2200 and 2300) . SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II . THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS . 1 . The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit to connect to the existing public sewer and storm drain pipes located within the City' s street right-of-way and easement areas, and to construct the new concrete driveway aprons and sidewalk. The pipe construction shall include a separate plan and profile for the work within the public street apart from the building plans. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) 2 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements . STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 3 . Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 1 4 . The applicant shall provide plans and calculations for the storm water quality pond for the approval of the Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 5 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing underground system without significantly impacting properties downstream. 6 . Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact : Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a . Pedestrian walkways to adjoining property to allow for future connection with adjoining development . b. Preservation of approximately 6 to 7 of the existing trees located within the cluster of trees located in the northwestern corner of the site by SW Milton Court . The revision shall remove a minimum of 5 parking spaces . The preserved area shall be designed to accomodate the required 24 foot accessway within the parking lot. c . A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18 . 116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage . The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off . The applicant shall also provide written hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. 7 . The applicant shall consolidate the three parcels into one parcel . Documentation shall be submitted which indicates consolidation has been completed. Alternatively, the applicant shall provide reciprocal access easements, parking agreements and covenants related to Uniform Building Code requirements . 8 . A tree removal permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. Staff Contact : Will D'Andrea, Planning Department (639-4171) . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 2 9 . An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted to the Police Department for review and approval . Staff Contact : Kelly Jennings, Police Department (639-4171) . THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS : 10 . All site improvements shall be installed as approved per the revised site plan. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II . FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . Backround: Tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300 , which are also lots #3 , #4 and #5 of the Bonita Industrial Park subdivision, were created through the platting of the subdivision in 1992 . The preliminary plat for this subdivision was approved by the City' s Land Use Hearings Officer on June 2, 1989 (S 88-07, SL 88-05) . In February 1981, the City approved a zone change from R-7 and M-3 to M-3 (PD) with conditions relating to the development of the property (ZC PD 13-80 / Ordinance No. 81-03) . A revised proposal was reviewed in September 1981 and was denied for lack of adequate information (PD 25-81 / M 5-81) . In 1983 , in conjunction with the adoption of the City' s Comprehensive Plan, the zone of the property was amended from M-3 (PD) to I-L (Light Industrial) . In 1985, the applicant submitted two proposals to divide the subject property into 14 lots and for a Sensitive Lands approval to allow regrading and the development of a road within the 100-year floodplain (S 7- NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 3 85 / SL 5-85) . Those approvals were not acted upon and the approvals expired. No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. 2 . Vicinity Information: The subject property is located north of SW Bonita Road and west of SW 72nd Avenue. Properties to the north, south and west are zoned I-L. Properties to the east are zoned I-H (Heavy Industrial) . Property to the north, west and south are vacant . Property to the east is developed with an industial steel plant . 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description: The site consists of approximately 130, 680 square feet, is presently vancant and contains a number of mature trees . The applicant is proposing to construct a 48, 900 square foot manufacturing/warehouse/office building. The proposal includes two driveways to SW Milton Court . 4 . Other Staff Comments : The Tigard Building Department has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : The building crosses two property lines . They need to "tie" these lots so that they cannot be sold separately, or the buildings will require covenants recorded on each regarding this situation. The Tigard Police Department has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting plan for review and approval . 5 . Agency Comments : General Telephone and Electronics has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : Developer to place conduit for telephone service to GTE specifications. The City of Tigard Water Department, City of Tigard Maintenance Services Department, City of Tigard Police Department, Tualatin NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 4 Valley Fire District, Portland General Electric, Northwest Natural Gas has reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections . No other comments have been received. SECTION III . ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS : Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a manufacturing, warehouse and office building. This use is classified in Code Section 18 .42 (Use Classifications) as Manufacturing of Finished Products. Code Section 18 . 70 . 030 allows Manufacturing of Finished Products as a permitted use in the I-L zoning district . Minimum Lot Area: Section 18 . 70 . 050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the I-L zoning district . The site has an average lot width of approximately 220 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the I-L zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant is proposing approximately 34, 338 square feet or 26% of the site for landscaping. Setbacks : Section 18 . 70 . 050 states that the front yard setback is 30 feet and that no side yard or rear yard setback is required except 50 feet shall be required where the I-L zone abuts a residential zoning district . As indicated on the site plan, the front yard setback is satisfied. Side and rear yards are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing a building height of 27 feet, well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Section 18 . 120 . 180 (A) (1) (Site Development Review - Approval Standards) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code . The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18 . 100, 18 . 102, 18 . 106, 18 . 108, 18 . 114 , 18 . 120 , 18 . 150, and 18 . 164 . The proposal ' s consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections . The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18 . 84 (Sensitive Lands) , 18 . 92 (Density Computations) , 18 . 94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations) , 18 . 98 (Building Height Limitations : Exceptions) , or 18 .144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 5 18 . 120 . 180 .A. 1 . These Chapters are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards . Code section 18 . 120 . 180 .A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections . These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18 . 120 . 180 .3 (Exterior Elevations) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 5 (Privacy and Noise) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 6 (Private Outdoor Areas : Residential Use) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 7 (Shared Oudoor Recreation Areas : Residential Use) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 8 (Sensitive Lands) , 18 . 120 .180 . 9 (Demarcation of Spaces) , and are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards . Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment : Section 18 . 120 . 180 .2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are a number of mature trees on the property, with the majority of these clustered in the northwestern corner of the property near SW Milton Drive . The applicant is limited in area for designing the site to accomodate the required parking and access to accomodate the proposed building. Given the location of the parking area and accessway, as well as the grading required to accomodate this proposal the majority of the existing trees will be removed. The proposed plan indicates that approximately only two of the existing trees will remain. Since the applicant is proposing more than the number of parking spaces required, a revised site plan shall be submitted which allows preservation of approximately 6 to 7 of the trees located in that northeastern cluster of trees . The revision may remove a minimum of 5 parking spaces . The preserved area shall be designed to accomodate the required 24 foot accessway within the parking lot . Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses : Section 18 . 120 . 108 .4 (A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses . This criteria is not applicable as this proposal does not abut a use which requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18 . 100 .130) . Section 18 . 120 . 108 .4 (B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 6 properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indictated on the site plan, parking and storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties . Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18 . 102 . 108 . 10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval . Landscaping Plan: Section 18 . 100 . 015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs . Street Trees : Section 18 . 100 . 033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18 . 100 . 035 . Section 18 . 100 . 035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large) . The preliminary landscape plan shows the provision of 13 red sunset maple and Northern red oak trees to be spaced approximately 30 feet apart, satisfying this requirement . Screening: Special Provisions : Section 18 . 100 . 110 (A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas . Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees . Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect . The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, the applicant has provided screening of the parking lot in accordance with this section. Visual Clearance Areas : Section 18 . 102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 7 all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height . The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed) . A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, this requirement shall be satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18 . 106 . 030 (D) requires a minimum of one parking space per employee of the largest shift for Manufacturing. The applicant has stated that the largest number of staff on the premise does not exceed 80 individuals during the main shift which runs between 7 :30 am to 5 :00 pm. Therefore, the total number of required parking spaces is 80 spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 95 parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement . The applicant has been conditioned to revise the site plan to allow the preservation of existing trees . The revised site plan shall provide for a minimum of 80 parking spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) , which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 4 disabled parking spaces if 76 to 100 parking spaces are provided. This site provides 95 parking spaces, thereby requiring 4 disabled parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 4 disabled person parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement . Bicycle Parking: Section 18 . 106 . 020 (P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development . Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways . Six (6) bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development . The applicant statement states that 7 bicycle parking spaces will be provided within the warehouse portion of the building, thereby satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 8 Off-Street Loading Spaces : Section 18 . 106 . 080 (A) requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10, 000 square feet or more, shall have at least one off-street loading space on site. As indicated on the site plan, one off-street loading space is provided in accordance with this section. Access : Section 18 . 108 . 080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum access width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet . In addition, curbs are required as well as a five foot sidewalk. This criteria is satisfied as the plan shows the provision of two, 40 foot access drives . The applicant has been required to revise the site plan to preserve existing trees . This revision shall allow the provision of the required 24 foot driveway width required within the parking area. Walkways : Section 18 . 108 . 050 (A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments . Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6 inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3 foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obtructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards . The proposed site plan shows the provision of one walkway connection to SW Milton Court but does not provide connections with adjoining industrial development . A revised site plan shall be submitted which provides for pedestrian connections to adjoining developments . Signs : Section 18 . 114 . 130 (F) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-L zone . All signs NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 9 shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage : Section 18 . 116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers . The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off . The applicant shall submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. The applicant shall also provide written hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. Tree Removal : Section 18 .150 contains standards for obtaining a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS : Sections 18 . 164 . 030 (E) (1) (a) (Streets) , 18 . 164 . 090 (Sanitary Sewer) , and 18 . 164 . 100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1 . Streets : The applicant proposes two driveways onto SW Milton Court which is a local industrial street that was developed with the original subdivision improvements completed in April, 1993 . The final lift of the asphalt overlay was completed earlier this year. The only outstanding work is the sidewalk and driveway apron construction that should be completed concurrent with the on-site work. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit (SOP) from the Engineering Department for this construction. 2 . Sanitary Sewer: The applicant proposes to connect to the existing 15 inch public trunk sanitary sewer line that is located in an NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 10 easement crossing the westerly portion of the site adjacent to SW Milton Court . The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this project . The applicant shall include this work as a part of the SOP for the project . 3 . Storm Drainage : The existing site slopes in a westerly direction toward SW Milton Court . The applicant proposes to collect the storm water in a new underground system and drain to a proposed on-site water quality facility. The pond will connect to existing system in the street with the construction of a new lateral . The applicant shall include this work as a part of the SOP for the project . The proposed water quality facility is to be located within the portion of the site that is affected by the 100 year flood plain of the adjacent Fanno Creek watershed. A Sensitive Lands Permit was approved for the subdivision construction and no other construction is proposed within the flood plain area. However, the applicant should submit the plan and calculations for the pond construction to the Engineering Department for approval prior to construction. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The proposed on-site water quality facility should be designed to comply with the minimum standards of USA and will satisfy the USA regulations . The on-site system consisting of the underground pipe construction and the water quality pond shall be maintained by the owner as private facilities . SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1 . Notice : Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 11 2 . Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON August 9, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3 . Appeal : Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 . 32 . 290 (A) and Section 18 . 32 . 370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent . Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. 819/95 . 4 . Questions : If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171) , City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223 rP& 7/27/95 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner ccJ� (Ze.440144 `4 7/27/95 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 12 N • I Lip n • [1 SANDBU .Q TECH CENTER a 0 L __----- 0■• .:9c, LANDMARK Z z do le ouzo czb �� 6, O u J•=sift. crap" NN. i:..n/'S' 0 ma rall ,9 ,,, cc ■ cnd / r Q O // -o 'I? AVR 1 W Y s9pp C3 . in dill U � 0 NITA RD III , BONITA RD >" pMARA CS U 1 w ID w .j 0 > Q 7 VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: iii 0 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1 NO-TH 95-0010 Scale 1'=400. FEET BRUiti/MILDREN DESIGN CROUP 0 400 800 M:\GISDAT\TIOCOV\NELSDWO\SXNI3 3/13/95 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 08/01/95 12:45 $503 ,596 2538 TV FIRE MARSHAL Z002/004 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS' RECEIVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD OREGON AUG 0 41995 juL I '.; 1995 DATE: June 22. 1995 FIRE N,„,,,I,,,i. orrta TO: Fire Marshall FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (X315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ► The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June , 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. written comments provided below: - Z� J a / 41 , / a . ^ 0 42t Sj��• PL.yy /_3 I �L .L N r fl r�r � F_ (Please Drovlde the following info/marion) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: SDR 95-0010 BROWN!MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,19% REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON DATE: June 22, 1995 TO: Kelly Jennings, Tigard Police Department FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ► The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June , 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: twee �ci '� , t6e- (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: A_ A , _, , 414 Phone Number: / I SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,1995 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Will D'Andrea July 11, 1995 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engine1� RE: SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP Description: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 48, 900 sft warehouse/office building on a 2 . 99 acre site located on the east side of SW Milton Court, northerly of SW Bonita Road. The site is comprised of Tax Lots 2S1 12AB 2100, 2200 and 2300 which are Lots 3, 4 and 5 of the "Bonita Industrial Park" Subdivision. Findings: 1 . Streets: The applicant proposes two driveways onto SW Milton Court which is a local industrial street that was developed with the original subdivision improvements completed in April, 1993. The final lift of the asphalt overlay was completed earlier this year. The only outstanding work is the sidewalk and driveway apron construction that should be completed concurrent with the on-site work. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit (SOP) from the Engineering Department for this construction. 2 . Sanitary Sewer: The applicant proposes to connect to the existing 15 inch public trunk sanitary sewer line that is located in an easement crossing the westerly portion of the site adjacent to SW Milton Court. The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this project . The applicant shall include this work as a part of the SOP for the project . 3. Storm Drainage: The existing site slopes in a westerly direction toward SW Milton Court . The applicant proposes to collect the storm water in a new underground system and drain to a proposed on-site water quality facility. The pond will connect to existing system in the street with the construction of a new lateral. The applicant shall include this work as a part of the SOP for the project. The proposed water quality facility is to be located within the portion of the site that is affected by the 100 year flood plain of the adjacent Fanno Creek watershed. A Sensitive Lands Permit was approved for the subdivision construction and no other construction is proposed within the flood plain area. However, the applicant should submit the plan and calculations for the pond construction to the Engineering Department for approval prior to construction. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-10 BROWN/MILDREN PAGE 1 The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The proposed on- site water quality facility should be designed to comply with the minimum standards of USA and will satisfy the USA regulations . The on-site system consisting of the underground pipe construction and the water quality pond shall be maintained by the owner as private facilities. Recommendations : PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1 . The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit to connect to the existing public sewer and storm drain pipes located within the City' s street right-of-way and easement areas, and to construct the new concrete driveway aprons and sidewalk. The pipe construction shall include a separate plan and profile for the work within the public street apart from the building plans. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) 2 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 3. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. 4 . The applicant shall provide plans and calculations for the storm water quality pond for the approval of the Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 5 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing underground system without significantly impacting properties downstream. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-10 BROWN/MILDREN PAGE 2 IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. (22.2/4/-;r7 APPROVED: Randall R. Wool , City Engineer MJA:SDR 95-10.mja ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-10 BROWN/MILDREN PAGE 3 EQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 121995 CITY DATE: June 22, 1995 TO: Dave Scott, Building Official FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ► The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 251 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June , 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: � (Ayt.s a z ll ■ lei ‘)h't, /c\ \1 � \ ) �e-e \ SD �Ch�\ mac. ("NN.�'t S�\ ` 5 8, �( I of c\\Ny c N. •l\ (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: c�'�� 7 Phone Number: r3.\\ SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,1995 EQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD JUL 121995 OREGON DATE: June 22, 1995 TO: Engineering Office, General Telephone FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ■ The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June , 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ,c written comments provided below: bek.le.LOPE2 -Co Pica Catit(Dout Pest G-L---E_`.5 5p,EaRc�4TconIS (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: 4o"` W0 Phone Number: ,0 {020-5943 SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,1995 'EQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD OREGON JUG 101995 DATE: June 22, 1995 TO: Scott Palmer, Northwest Natural Gas Company FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ► The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June , 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XXXX We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) dame of Person Commenting: G SCOTT PALMER Phone Number: ( 5;)3) 721 -2449 SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,1995 'EQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD OREGON JUL 101995 DATE: June 22, 1995 TO: Brian Moore, Portland General Electric FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ► The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to o taff, a-reR• - and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the propos. n the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June . 199 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you - e unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted abov- ith your com •ents and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, .• I ac - - Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: TL Phone Number: SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,1995 'EQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD OREGON JUL 0 7 1995 DATE: June 22, 1995 TO: Michael Miller, Water Department FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ► The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June , 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: MI Kam' gizz6z,- Phone Number: SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,1995 EQUEST FOR COMMENTS A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON DATE: June 22, 1995 TO: Per Attached FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP ► The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: June , 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22, 1995 <cs:=.4l;CJI r ..,l ..\JIVIIVICIVIJ 5D� qS—C sb • NCT TI=N LIST FOR LAND USE &DEVELOPMENT APPUC NS Braun /'1i 1dreliDe5.jf) CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (c:rCe o —CT Area: (N) (S) (E (C) " Placed for review•n Library CT Book " —CPO NO. i CITY DEPARTMENTS w Ifz'Bu+lding Ctticial/Dave Scott k-Police/Keay Jennings _Reid Cperations/John Acker City Recorder/Cathy Wheatley �1ltgineenng/Michael Anderson _Pen-ruts Fccilttator/Jerree Gaynor — _Advanced Planning/Carol Landsman Water Deportment/Michael Miller i SPECIAL DISTRICTS . ISTRICTS I ZFre Marshall Zified Sewerage Agency —Tualatin Valley Water District j Wa. County Fire District SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 (pick-up box) 155 N. First Street Beaverton.CR 97075 Hillsboro.CR 97124 ! AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wa. Co. Deot. of Land Use& Trcrsoortaticn _Boundary Commission —METRO -GREENSPACES PROGRAM 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Cregon St. 010.Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro.CR 97124 Portland.OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland.OR 97232-2736 —Brent Curtis(CPA's) _State Highway Division _.;im lice(IGA'S) Sam Hurcidi — COOT/Region 1 _Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Transportation Planning _Scott King(CPA's) Portland.CR 97=5-0412 123 N.W. Flcrders _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland.OR 97209-4037 _Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _Cregon DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street.N.E. _Other _CIty of Beaverton Salem.OR 9731040590 Jlm Hencryx - Princ:ocl Planner _Cry of Portland PO Box 4755 _City of Durham Planning Director Beaverton. OR 97076 Cry Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland.CR 97204 —City of IGng City Tigard,OR 97281-3483 City Manager _City of Lake Oswego 15300 SW 116th _Clty of Tualatin City Manager ling City.OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Sox 369 Tualatin.CR 97062 Lake Oswego.CR 97034 SPECIAL AGENCIES •< %General Telephone Portland General Electric _Columcic Cable Engineering Office Brian Moore Craig Eyesrone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Cld Scrolls Ferry Road 14200 SW Bngadoon Court Tigard,CR 97281-3416 Beaverton.CR 97=07 Beaverton, CR 97005 /NW Natural Gas —Metro Area Communications/Jason Hewitt -Met Transit Development Scott Pclmer Twin Oaks Technology Center iGm Knox,Project Parr-et 220 NW Second Avenue 1815 NW 169th Pace 5-5020 710 NE Holladay Street Portand.CR 97209-3991 Beaverton,CR 97CC6-4886 Portland,OR 97232 —TCI Cabievs+cn of Oregon —US West Communications _Southern Pacific Trcrsoortction Co. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney. PLS- Project Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Cak Street 800 NW 5th Avenue Room 324, Union Station Portland.CR 97201 Portland.CR 97204 Portland.CR 97209 STATE AGENCIES —Aeronautics Division(CCC ) —Division of Slate L ants _US Postal Service Commerce Dept. -M.H. Park —Fsn &Wildlife Randy Hammock,Growth Coorcincicr PVC _DCGAMI Cedar Mill Station _Dent. of Envircn. duality Portland.CR 97229-9998 FEDERAL AGENCIES • Corgis_ or =-g,ree,s _ ter — AFFjDAvh,o F"''AILING County TE OF O�G of ON City o fTigardshington {rr. `3 !1 } oRECpni 4 ° )ss, I, Patricia L Luas fo } rd, That I am being first duly swo a senor Office Assistant for T �a�rm, on oath, de That I s he City of Tib'ard� O pose and say' That erred NOTICE OF p regon. I served NOTICE UgLIC If UFDECISION FO FOR. -- City R. of copy°f the i Tigard Of Tigard plan• sh ►�'hiCh is attached,PLIC Tigard 'planning C Wing Direct PUBLIC°n the attached nia 8- G NOTIC Tigard C rings Of ee issiOn °r posted C KEq�N list(s), rn Exhibit E/NOTIC O°ncil �t ��A„ E States email onppr°p atO bICE 4F D�Exhibit ,�S mail d t De CIS1pN0 CI N ; o the each TIC he day o etin b°ard X10 e OTICEthO 6 day of ..person n �F FIN,9L O d F FINAL 19 0) at the DER }postageprepa d of Y, ORDER a hereto NO TICE •► ' _ d deposited in the was •repared Not;Ce)�44,11111110...Illt United Subscribed and swo illirri/a wed before me on the �� ,,� ��`' aY of NOTARY ' 19• oFFicIAL SEAL Of, /l'`r D'A M JEIDEAKS - ''f'`- // /4 /' l IC O R YPUBp�� -*-4 COMMISS o 0461 2 !F OREGON My CbMMlSSiQN EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 7 99 M Y Commission E xpu es M0 95 00o REN DESIGN GROUpfeROwN NoT/CE OF DECISION BY THE PLANNING pIRECTOR EXIT'ti CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0010 BROWN - OWNER MILDREN DESIGN GROUP - APPLICANT APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval for a 57, 900 square foot manufacturing / warehouse / office building. Comprehensive Plan: I-L (Light Industrial) . Zone: I-L, (Light Industrial) . Location: (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lot 2100, 2200 and 2300) . SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions . The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II . THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 1 . The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit to connect to the existing public sewer and storm drain pipes located within the City' s street right-of-way and easement areas, and to construct the new concrete driveway aprons and sidewalk. The pipe construction shall include a separate plan and profile for the work within the public street apart from the building plans. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) 2 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 3 . Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 1 4 . The applicant shall provide plans and calculations for the storm water quality pond for the approval of the Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 5 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing underground system without significantly impacting properties downstream. 6 . Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact : Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Pedestrian walkways to adjoining property to allow for future connection with adjoining development . b. Preservation of approximately 6 to 7 of the existing trees located within the cluster of trees located in the northwestern corner of the site by SW Milton Court . The revision shall remove a minimum of 5 parking spaces. The preserved area shall be designed to accomodate the required 24 foot accessway within the parking lot . c . A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18 . 116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off. The applicant shall also provide written hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. 7 . The applicant shall consolidate the three parcels into one parcel . Documentation shall be submitted which indicates consolidation has been completed. Alternatively, the applicant shall provide reciprocal access easements, parking agreements and covenants related to Uniform Building Code requirements . 8 . A tree removal permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. Staff Contact : Will D'Andrea, Planning Department (639-4171) . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 2 9 . An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted to the Police Department for review and approval . Staff Contact : Kelly Jennings, Police Department (639-4171) . THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS : 10 . All site improvements shall be installed as approved per the revised site plan. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II . FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . Backround: Tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300, which are also lots #3 , #4 and #5 of the Bonita Industrial Park subdivision, were created through the platting of the subdivision in 1992 . The preliminary plat for this subdivision was approved by the City' s Land Use Hearings Officer on June 2, 1989 (S 88-07, SL 88-05) . In February 1981, the City approved a zone change from R-7 and M-3 to M-3 (PD) with conditions relating to the development of the property (ZC PD 13-80 / Ordinance No. 81-03) . A revised proposal was reviewed in September 1981 and was denied for lack of adequate information (PD 25-81 / M 5-81) . In 1983, in conjunction with the adoption of the City' s Comprehensive Plan, the zone of the property was amended from M-3 (PD) to I-L (Light Industrial) . In 1985, the applicant submitted two proposals to divide the subject property into 14 lots and for a Sensitive Lands approval to allow regrading and the development of a road within the 100-year floodplain (S 7- NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 3 85 / SL 5-85) . Those approvals were not acted upon and the approvals expired. No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. 2 . Vicinity Information: The subject property is located north of SW Bonita Road and west of SW 72nd Avenue . Properties to the north, south and west are zoned I-L. Properties to the east are zoned I-H (Heavy Industrial) . Property to the north, west and south are vacant . Property to the east is developed with an industial steel plant . 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description: The site consists of approximately 130, 680 square feet, is presently vancant and contains a number of mature trees . The applicant is proposing to construct a 48, 900 square foot manufacturing/warehouse/office building. The proposal includes two driveways to SW Milton Court. 4 . Other Staff Comments : The Tigard Building Department has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : The building crosses two property lines. They need to "tie" these lots so that they cannot be sold separately, or the buildings will require covenants recorded on each regarding this situation. The Tigard Police Department has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting plan for review and approval . 5 . Agency Comments : General Telephone and Electronics has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : Developer to place conduit for telephone service to GTE specifications. The City of Tigard Water Department, City of Tigard Maintenance Services Department, City of Tigard Police Department, Tualatin NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 4 Valley Fire District, Portland General Electric, Northwest Natural Gas has reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. SECTION III . ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS : Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a manufacturing, warehouse and office building. This use is classified in Code Section 18 .42 (Use Classifications) as Manufacturing of Finished Products. Code Section 18 . 70 . 030 allows Manufacturing of Finished Products as a permitted use in the I-L zoning district . Minimum Lot Area: Section 18 . 70 .050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the I-L zoning district . The site has an average lot width of approximately 220 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the I-L zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant is proposing approximately 34, 338 square feet or 26% of the site for landscaping. Setbacks: Section 18 . 70 . 050 states that the front yard setback is 30 feet and that no side yard or rear yard setback is required except 50 feet shall be required where the I-L zone abuts a residential zoning district . As indicated on the site plan, the front yard setback is satisfied. Side and rear yards are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing a building height of 27 feet, well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Section 18 . 120 . 180 (A) (1) (Site Development Review - Approval Standards) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18 . 100, 18 .102, 18 . 106, 18 . 108, 18 . 114, 18 . 120, 18 . 150, and 18 . 164 . The proposal ' s consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections . The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18 . 84 (Sensitive Lands) , 18 . 92 (Density Computations) , 18 . 94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations) , 18 . 98 (Building Height Limitations : Exceptions) , or 18 . 144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 5 18 . 120 . 180 .A. 1 . These Chapters are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards . Code section 18 . 120 . 180 .A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections . These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18 . 120 . 180 . 3 (Exterior Elevations) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 5 (Privacy and Noise) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 6 (Private Outdoor Areas : Residential Use) , 18 .120 . 180 . 7 (Shared Oudoor Recreation Areas : Residential Use) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 8 (Sensitive Lands) , 18 . 120 . 180 . 9 (Demarcation of Spaces) , and are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards . Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment : Section 18 . 120 . 180 .2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are a number of mature trees on the property, with the majority of these clustered in the northwestern corner of the property near SW Milton Drive . The applicant is limited in area for designing the site to accomodate the required parking and access to accomodate the proposed building. Given the location of the parking area and accessway, as well as the grading required to accomodate this proposal the majority of the existing trees will be removed. The proposed plan indicates that approximately only two of the existing trees will remain. Since the applicant is proposing more than the number of parking spaces required, a revised site plan shall be submitted which allows preservation of approximately 6 to 7 of the trees located in that northeastern cluster of trees. The revision may remove a minimum of 5 parking spaces. The preserved area shall be designed to accomodate the required 24 foot accessway within the parking lot . Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses : Section 18 . 120 . 108 .4 (A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses . This criteria is not applicable as this proposal does not abut a use which requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18 . 100 . 130) . Section 18 . 120 . 108 .4 (B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 6 properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indictated on the site plan, parking and storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties . Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18 . 102 . 108 . 10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic . An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval. Landscaping Plan: Section 18 . 100 . 015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs . Street Trees : Section 18 . 100 . 033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18 . 100 . 035 . Section 18 . 100 . 035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large) . The preliminary landscape plan shows the provision of 13 red sunset maple and Northern red oak trees to be spaced approximately 30 feet apart, satisfying this requirement . Screening: Special Provisions : Section 18 . 100 . 110 (A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas . Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees . Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect . The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, the applicant has provided screening of the parking lot in accordance with this section. Visual Clearance Areas : Section 18 . 102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 7 all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed) . A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, this requirement shall be satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18 . 106 . 030 (D) requires a minimum of one parking space per employee of the largest shift for Manufacturing. The applicant has stated that the largest number of staff on the premise does not exceed 80 individuals during the main shift which runs between 7 :30 am to 5 : 00 pm. Therefore, the total number of required parking spaces is 80 spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 95 parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement . The applicant has been conditioned to revise the site plan to allow the preservation of existing trees . The revised site plan shall provide for a minimum of 80 parking spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) , which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 4 disabled parking spaces if 76 to 100 parking spaces are provided. This site provides 95 parking spaces, thereby requiring 4 disabled parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 4 disabled person parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement . Bicycle Parking: Section 18 . 106 . 020 (P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development . Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways . Six (6) bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development . The applicant statement states that 7 bicycle parking spaces will be provided within the warehouse portion of the building, thereby satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 8 Off-Street Loading Spaces : Section 18 . 106 . 080 (A) requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10, 000 square feet or more, shall have at least one off-street loading space on site. As indicated on the site plan, one off-street loading space is provided in accordance with this section. Access : Section 18 . 108 . 080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum access width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet . In addition, curbs are required as well as a five foot sidewalk. This criteria is satisfied as the plan shows the provision of two, 40 foot access drives . The applicant has been required to revise the site plan to preserve existing trees . This revision shall allow the provision of the required 24 foot driveway width required within the parking area. Walkways : Section 18 . 108 . 050 (A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments . Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6 inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3 foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obtructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards . The proposed site plan shows the provision of one walkway connection to SW Milton Court but does not provide connections with adjoining industrial development . A revised site plan shall be submitted which provides for pedestrian connections to adjoining developments . Signs : Section 18 . 114 . 130 (F) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-L zone . All signs NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 9 shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage : Section 18 . 116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance : Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off. The applicant shall submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. The applicant shall also provide written hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. Tree Removal : Section 18 . 150 contains standards for obtaining a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18 . 164 . 030 (E) (1) (a) (Streets) , 18 . 164 . 090 (Sanitary Sewer) , and 18 .164 . 100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1 . Streets : The applicant proposes two driveways onto SW Milton Court which is a local industrial street that was developed with the original subdivision improvements completed in April, 1993 . The final lift of the asphalt overlay was completed earlier this year. The only outstanding work is the sidewalk and driveway apron construction that should be completed concurrent with the on-site work. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit (SOP) from the Engineering Department for this construction. 2 . Sanitary Sewer: The applicant proposes to connect to the existing 15 inch public trunk sanitary sewer line that is located in an NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 10 easement crossing the westerly portion of the site adjacent to SW Milton Court . The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this project . The applicant shall include this work as a part of the SOP for the project . 3 . Storm Drainage: The existing site slopes in a westerly direction toward SW Milton Court . The applicant proposes to collect the storm water in a new underground system and drain to a proposed on-site water quality facility. The pond will connect to existing system in the street with the construction of a new lateral . The applicant shall include this work as a part of the SOP for the project . The proposed water quality facility is to be located within the portion of the site that is affected by the 100 year flood plain of the adjacent Fanno Creek watershed. A Sensitive Lands Permit was approved for the subdivision construction and no other construction is proposed within the flood plain area. However, the applicant should submit the plan and calculations for the pond construction to the Engineering Department for approval prior to construction. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The proposed on-site water quality facility should be designed to comply with the minimum standards of USA and will satisfy the USA regulations . The on-site system consisting of the underground pipe construction and the water quality pond shall be maintained by the owner as private facilities . SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1 . Notice : Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 11 2 . Final Decision.: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON August 9, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3 . Appeal : Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 .32 . 290 (A) and Section 18 . 32 . 370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent . Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. 8/9/95 . 4 . Questions : If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171) , City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ne4446.. 4 7/27/95 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner LatACJL. A.. 7/27/95 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0010 BROWN / MILDREN DESIGN PAGE 12 II N t` J SANDBU TECH CENTER a w 0 z i2 ANDMARK ) a A7 o � •kO G� J F, pro 40 2 p ii /INN° 4,• ii:4•,:"Afr _ 0 co 0 / Q O -o 0 0 WEAVR n ••ROES �� WY 0 L P~ "iii& 11 ' �O) ` 0 )NITA RD BONITA RD Ir. lc . /` U w H .1. 53 w 0 Q 0 I VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: co SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) NORTH 95-0010 Scale 1".400' FEET BROWN/MILDREN DESIQ GROUP 0 400 800 M:\GISDAT\TIGCOV\NELSDWG\SXN13 3/13/95 EXHIBIT B 2S112BA-00200 2S, 12AB-00400 STEWART, DAVID A & SUSFN A PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 24001 NE BUTTEVILLE RD 121 SW SALMON ST AURORA OR 97002 PORTLAND OR 97204 2S112AB-00700 2S112AB-00800 ANDERSEN, H A ET AL FOUGHT, JOSEPH M ET AL BY FOUGHT CO INC BY FOUGHT CO INC PO BOX 23759 PO BOX 23759 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AB-01600 2S112AB-01700 w240 . . L COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL TIGARD, CITY OF BY BONITA COMMUNITY CHURCH 13125 SW HALL P 0 BOX 324 PO BOX 23397- COLUMBIA CITY OR 97018 3 ARD- OR 97223 2S112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY MILTON BROWN FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. 150 N FIRST AVE, RM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97229 HILLSBORO OR 97124 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP STARKWEATHER 11830 SW KERR, SUITE 325 c/o BROWN, MILTON LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND OR 97229 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0010_ BRO N/MTLDRF2I DFSTC44 MOUP COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8273 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising *City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard ,Oregon 97223-8199 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit _ •Accounts Payable—Terry • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)95-0010/ BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of S.W. Bonita Road AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION on the westside of S.W. Milton Court(WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, STATE OF OREGON, ) and 2300).ZONE: C-P(Professional Commercial).The Professional COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, s. Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities,professional and administrative services, finan- I, Kathy Snyder cial,insurance,and real estate services,business support services,multi- being first duly sworn, depose and say, that I am the Advertising ple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW Director, or his principal clerk, of theT igard—Tualatin T'me s CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, a newspaper of general circulation s defined in ORS 193.010 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. -- r �.E 1- and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the Site Develop 95-0010/Brown/Mildren (Map) gu a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the \. entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and ‘.\ (\ consecutive in the following issues: 3t,,,t,r July 27 ,1995 1l''.. i s .i. wil ,. . , _1(c-dus 4,,,yt, III ! �� �_ gym: ,,y�,.- Subscribed and sworn to yefore me this27t-h c3ay of Jul 1y, 19 Note ublic for Oregon le pp, *.0$51 4,- . itiatrl r \..,. ..... , �w i-.0 l aR My Commission Expires: y �` II AFFIDAVIT 1111 ; \\ - ` O O y • The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on August 9 1995. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,August 9. 1995. TT8273—Publish July 27, 1995. . . • . ,; .A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. )1JR oi s-Qo(C) OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: I 046 ���a� ' .Or DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION l Lr / / a Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION LOTS 3, 4, 0G (A) Application form (1) eXW/rr1 /Aiet/STA1.4C. P/ - 1 (B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. authorization 1 f (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE /Ikb, 1p$D 5.p. (a.,11 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* /b/lab"/ O. l�e40P4 / (E) Plot lan (pre-app p p pp checklist)✓ ADDRESS 3O/ /VW mu/4/44r 1.64 HONE 614 •577. (F) Applicant's statement CITY /W4744vp ZIP 9'7Z2? (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* NJ/CDC/ G,COvf G. (G) List of property owners and t� ADDRESS //,02 kei4t,4325 PHONE 244-05c addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY 4,4rie d15.14/~, ZIP '77C4, (H) Filing fee ($ ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow ,PEvErco.474iE•47 O, A Approval Date: 48,16d '..f. tot eeitecisy offixes Su t. 1'A''v6 . isoew Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: /NOME: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. - D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. t DATED this CP day of• �./tJ'NE. '� " ' r" 19a7S SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) 6f -the subject'propSrfy:►t�j' �r''1v' '" " (lite 'brA** r4.:4# (KSL:pm/05 24P) :\ �_ •a c *.' .'2,. ' LiK1` . c.)'>`r7.1 )1\\ r PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION !•. CITY OF TIGARD OREGON FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0010 FILE TITLE: BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP APPLICANT: Mildren Design Group OWNER: Milton Brown 11830 SW Kerr, Suite 325 301 NW Murray Blvd. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Portland, OR 97229 (503) 02,44 ass: REQUEST: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building. LOCATION: North of SW Bonita Road on the westside of SW Milton Court (WCTM 2S1 12AB, tax lots 2100, 2200 and 2300). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (503) 639-4171 x315 SDR 95-0010 BROWN/MILDREN DESIGN GROUP June 22,1995 414 tionloA June 28, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Gene Mildren Mildren Design Group 11830 SW Kerr, Suite 325 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal Dear Mr. Mildren: This letter is a follow-up to our earlier telephone conversation. The Planning Division has conducted a preliminary review of Site Development Review (SDR) #95-0010, an application for a 48,900 square foot warehouse/office building, and have found that certain application materials were not provided with the submittal. The Planning Division is unable to continue processing the application pending submission of the following items and plan notes: 1 .) Application fee If you have any questions concerning this information please feel free to contact me at 639-4171 . Sincerely, Will D'Andrea Assistant Planner h:\login\will\sdr95.10.Itr Enclosure (1 ) c: File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigcrd, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 CITY OF MARC LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY OF TIGARD (Approved by City Council Effective 2/1/91) OREGON APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission $ 235.00 Planning Commission/Hearings Officer to City Council 315.00 BLASTING PERMITS (+ transcription costs) 125.00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING (Text, Map or Both) 675.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING (Conditional Use Review) 365.00 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS 80.00 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT 80.00 HOME OCCUPATION (No renewal) TYPE I (One) 10.00 TYPE II (Two) 50.00 INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE(S) (by C. D. Dept.) 55.00 LAND PARTITION (Residential & Non-Residential) 235.00 LOT LINE ADIUSTMENT 50.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING (Conceptual & Detailed Plan Review) 500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood Plain 520.00 Wetlands/Steep Slopes/Drainageways .235.00 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS 230.00 SIGN PERMIT 0 - 24 Square Feet 10.00 24 - 100 Square Feet 25.00 100 + Square Feet 35.00 Temporary Signs 10.00 (Per sign) SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under - $ 10,000 80.00 $ 10,000 - $ 99,999 155.00 S 100,000 - $ 499,999 315.00 S 500,000 - S 999,999 415.00 S 1,000,000 + 520.00 (+ S 1 per 510,000) SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT 415.00 (- 55 per lot) Subdivision Variance (if necessary) 105.00 TEMPORARY USE Director's Decision 50.00 Special Exemption/Non-Profit -0- VACATIONS (Streets & Public Access) 300.00 (Dep. - actual costs charged) VARIANCE Administrative 80.00 Sign Code 230.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than 10 Acres 520.00 10 Acres + 625.00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING Less than 10 Acres 520.00 10 Acres : 625.00 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 310.00 JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE 3 00 0 (or actual costs) (highest Fee - 10% Per ea. Subsequent Request.) y:Vaymoambevi pmt.tees hj,...........,-------, June 6, 1995 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. Architecture City of Tigard Space Planning Attention: Mr Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR RE: OWNCO Marketing Project Number 95003 Dear Will: In accordance with the Site Development Review Application we are submitting the following for review by the City of Tigard: 1. Completed application form 2. Owner's written authorization 3. Copy of Pre-Application Conference Notes 4. Applicant's statement 5. List of Property owners and addresses within 250' 6. Filing Fee 7. (18) folded copies of: a. Site Plan b. Topographical and boundary survey c. Site Grading Plan d. Site Utility Plan e. Concept Planting Plan f. First and Second Floor Plans g. Building Elevations 8. Affidavit of Mailing 9. Affidavit of Posting Notice 10. Letter as sent to property owners and community involvement coordinators Should you have any questions please call. Sinc• - , Ge,e Mildren ' esident/Architect cc: OWNCO Marketing, Jim Mendenhall Spieker Properties, John Souther 11830 SW Kerr Parkway,Suite 325 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 5031244-0552 Fax 244-0417 A‘. r✓'ct77 ✓e Lune 6, 1995 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. Architecture City of Tigard Space Planning Attention: Mr Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR RE: OWNCO Marketing Project Number 95003 Dear Will: On behalf of OWNCO Marketing we are requesting approval of the following for Site Development Review. This project occupies a lots 3, 4, and 5 of Bonita Industrial Park, Tax Map and Tax Lot number 251 12AB 2000, 2100, and 2200. The site is 130,680 square feet or 2.99 acres. The comprehensive plan designation and zoning designation is I-L. The following describes our project per the Pre-Application Conference Check List: Zoning District Dimensional Requirements 1. The front setback is 85', the required setback is 30'. 2. The site coverage is 37.4%,the maximum coverage allowed is 85%. 3. The landscaped or natural vegetation area is 26.3%, the minimum coverage allowed is 15%. 4. The building height is 27' above finish floor, the maximum building height allowed is 45'. Parking and Access 1. Required parking for the warehouse which is 39,000 square feet is 39 spaces. Required parking for the office area which has 18,900 square feet is 54 spaces. Total required parking is 90 spaces. Of the required parking 40% is allowed for compact cars. Parking provided is 52 standard spaces, 39 compact, and 4 handicapped for a total of 95 spaces. 2. Handicapped parking has been provided in accordance with Chapter 31 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code. 3. 7 bicycle parking spaces will be provided within the warehouse portion of the building. 4. Access areas between parking has been provided at 25'. The minimum required dimension is 24'. 5. There are two driveways along SW Milton Drive each 40'wide. The maximum allowable width is 40'. 6. A sidewalk will be provided SW Milton Drive to the main building entrance. Clear Vision Area 1. Clear vision areas have been provided at both entrances. 11830 SW Kerr Parkway,Suite 325 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 503/244-0552 Fax 244-0417 Mr.Will D'Andrea June 6, 1995 Page 2 Landscaping 1. 2" caliper street trees have been shown at 30' on center. 2. 16 additional trees have been shown for interior parking. A total of 14 trees would be required. 3. Site obscuring screening has been provided between parking and lot line areas. Street Improvements 1. Sidewalk in accordance with City of Tigard Standards will be completed along SW Milton Drive. Sanitary Sewers, 1. Connection is being made to the sanitary sewer line in SW Milton Drive as indicated on the Site Utility Plan. Stormwater Quality Fees/Facilities. 1. An on-site water quality swale has been provided which also provides for roof water. Should you have any questions regarding our narrative,please call. Sincerely, - e Mildren esident/Architect RECEIVED PLANNING MILTON O. BROWN I�)N 1995 301 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND, OREGON 97229 503-643-5756 June 5, 1995 Will D'Andrea City Of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S . W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Lots 3 , 4, & 5 Bonita Industrial Park Dear Mr. D'Andrea: Please accept this letter as our authorization for Oregon Wholesale Novelty and the City Of Tigard to proceed with whatever steps are necessary to enable Oregon Wholesale Novelty Co. to build on the above referenced lots . Title to the property is scheduled to be conveyed to Oregon Wholesale Novelty on the 23rd day of June, 1995 . If you have any questions or comments, please call Jack Steiger in my office at 643-5756 . Sincerely yours, Tri County Industrial Park, Inc . M (Ø:rown Mil eat,.r. - President CC :Stu Peterson C:\WP51\MOBPROP\LETTRRS\TIGARD.602 RECEIVED PLANNING -- JUN 2 8 1995 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) IWAN M. STARKWEATHER AND ROBERT M. STARKWEATHER, Trustees of the Iwan M. Starkweather Trust u/t May 20, 1987 as to an undivided 1/2 interest and ROBERT M. STARKWEATHER AND IWAN M. STARKWEAT: Trustees of the Robert M. Starkweather Trust u/t/a May 20, 1987 as to an undivided 1/2 intere: Grantor, conveys and specially warrants to MILTON 0. BROWN Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances created or suffered by by the grantor except as specifically set forth herein: (Continued) This instrument will not allow use of the property described in this instrument in violation of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. ENCUMBRANCES: THOSE OF RECORD The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 17,500.00 Dated, e-2-2,7e, /%72-:% if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by order of its board of directors. /,Pits//'/ X b'7/tr%Y2 � / /� = rte . � �� { x/�=.� �r//'n ( V14 IWAN M. STARKWEATHER, Trustee of the ROBERT M. STARKWEATHER, Trustee of the IWAN M. STARKWEATHER TRUST u/t/a 5/20/87 IWAN M. STARKWEATHER TRUST u/t/a 5/20/87 IWAN M. STARKWEATHE , Trustee or the •OBERT M. STARKWEATHER, Trustee of the ROBERT M. STARKWEATHER TRUST u/t/a 5/20/87 ROBERT M. STARKWEATHER TRUST u/t/a 5/20/8 STATE OF OREGON, County of (/ ,•kc),.,.,e s ) ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on - C FICIAL SEAL 1 , 19 ? ?:f4 GOO,EY by Q , NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON It This instrument was acknowledged before me on COMMISSION y MY COMMISSION E,PIRES APR. 14, 1996 by as of � ary Public for Or Ton y commission expires l//-".'7 ) After recording return to: Milton O. Brown 301 NW Murray Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97229 x &;?. t vy? Until a change is requested,al1 tax statements shall be sent to the following address: same as above Escrow No. 50000-6016-CE Order No. 135982 • RECEIVED PLANNING JUN 2 8 1995 • EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I : Beginning at the Northwest corner of the James H. Hicklin Donation Land Claim No. 43 in Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, and running thence East along the North line of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, 1584 . 3 feet to the Westerly boundary line of the Oregon Electric R.R. , thence South 41° 13 ' East on said boundary line 136 . 3 feet to an iron pipe, which iron pipe is the true place of beginning of the tract herein described. Thence from the above described true place of beginning South 41 ° 13 ' East along the westerly boundary line of the Oregon Electric R.R. Co. right-of-way 379 . 6 feet; thence continuing along said Railroad boundary line of a curve to the right (the long chord of which curve bears South 27 ° 16' East 1018 . 5 feet) to an iron pipe on the North line of County Road No . 736 . ; thence South 88 ° 59' West along the North line of said County Road 230 . 3 feet to an iron pipe set for the Southeast corner of that certain 50x100 foot tract of land conveyed to the Trustee of the Bonita Sunday School by deed as recorded at page 587 of Volume 160, Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records; thence North 10 01' West at right angles to said road 100 feet to an iron pipe at the Northeast corner of said Sunday School tract; thence South 880 59 ' West 50 . 0 feet to an iron pipe at the Northwest corner of said Sunday School tract ; thence South 1 001' East 70' to the Northeast corner of that tract conveyed to the City of Tigard on November 22 , 1965 in Book 578, Page 345, thence West along the North line of said tract 30' to the Northwest corner of said tract; thence 30! to the North line of Bonita Road; thence South 88° 59' West along the North line of said County road 406 . 6 feet to an iron pipe; thence North at right angles to the North line of said Section 12 a distance of 1203 . 9 feet to the place of beginning, and being a part of the same real estate conveyed to the Union Central Life Insurance Company by Deed dated January 22, 1940 and recorded in Book 186 of Deeds, page 517 of the Records of Washington County, Oregon, EXCEPT that portion in the Southwest corner conveyed to Frank Warlick, et al, on September 15, 1978 in fee no# 78-043086 . Re-recorded January 16, 1980, Fee No. 80001585, Washington County records . EXCEPT that portion described as Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Bonita Sunday School tract conveyed in Book 160, Page 587, Washington County Records, thence North 10 01' West along the East line of said tract and a continuation thereof 190 feet to a point, thence Easterly parallel with the North line of Bonita Road to the East line of the land conveyed to L.R. Davis and V. Fay Davis in Book 454 Page 440 , Washington County Records, thence Southerly • along said East line to the North line of Bonita Road, thence along said North line 230 . 3 feet more or less to the point of beginning. PARCEL II : Government Lots #5 and #6 in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon. Excepting therefrom that portion lying within the boundaries of the Oregon Electric Railroad Right of Way and the Southern Pacific Railroad Right of Way and also excepting therefrom that portion of Government Lot #5 lying East of the Southern Pacific Railroad Right of Way. PARCEL III : Beginning at an iron pipe on the North line of Section 12 , Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, which beginning point bears East 1337 . 6 feet from the Northwest corner of the James Hicklin Donation Land Claim #43 and running thence East on the section line 246 . 7 feet to an iron pipe on the Westerly right of way boundary line of the Oregon Electric Railroad; thence south 41 ° 13 ' East along said Westerly boundary line 136 . 3 feet to an iron pipe; thence South to the Northeast corner of that certain tract of land deeded to Henry J. Claverie on the 25th day of June, 1959, recorded November 9, 1959, in Book 424, records of deed of said county; thence Westerly to an iron pipe in the Westerly line of the J.B. Claverie Tract which iron pipe bears East 1337 . 6 feet and South 708 feet from the Northwest corner of the James Hicklin Donation Land Claim #43 ; thence Northerly 708 feet, more of less, to the place of beginning, Washington County, Oregon . PARCEL IV: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Bonita Sunday School tract conveyed in Book 160, page 587, Washington County Records, thence North 1 o 01' West along the East line of Said tract and a continuation thereof 190 feet to a point, thence Easterly parallel with the North line of Bonita Road to the East line of the land conveyed to L.R. Davis and V. Fay Davis in Book 454, Page 440, Washington County Records, thence Southerly along said East line to the North line of Bonita Road, thence along said North line 230 . 3 feet more or less to the point of beginning. A Name of applicant C WNCC7 W),A 17 / Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 25/ it ,48, 7-000, Z/00, -f 2 Z6 o Address or General Location 1-c'TS 1::71 4, 1 oP Oci,i 1TA /NOu6,Ti22i 4L. PA – AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, OSNE MI L-046,J , do affirm that I xf(represent) the pang initiating interest in a proposed 1.mkge1buse/O-r-7cf affecting the land located at X75 , 4, 1' 5 'fat //X400S72i't /h,rx . and did on the S day of J.)/yE , 19 9S personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 4 /7:6 a5%l- r_ , z$.17 application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at LOT 4/ /M /' 77/2/,1t.,/p --- . (state location on property) This day of v uN 7 a. , 19 3 e r i. .t e Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this Jam` day of Utz-del 19 q6- I 666l'06 L.:: ,__.-,L I,:,,,,,S,nn09 An Nota Public for the ' of Oregon N0 3 0�i elnd AElV I ON -___,..11. My ommission Expir•s: A-Pk/4- •1j , '9 q b3HOd3nZ'N N1/sns t,4 1,, 1V3S 1VIOHHAo •..�; WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Icgin\jo\postnctnt MILDREN DESIGN GROUP, P.C. cure Space Space Planning June 5, 1995 City of Tigard Attention: Will Andrea PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97281 RE: Proposed Building for OWNCO Project Number 95003 Dear Will In accordance with our public meeting notices dated June 5, 1995 our office opened the Red Rock Creek Conference Room on June 21, 1995 at 7:20 p.m.. Our office closed the conference room at 7:50 p.m. due to no attendance by the public. - Should you have any questions please call. Sincerely, Ge Mildren r sident/Architect cc: OWNCO Marketing, Jim Mendenhall 11830 SW Kerr Parkway,Suite 325 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 5031244-0552 Fax 244-0417 June 5, 1995 MTLDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. Architecture City of Tigard Space Planning PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97281 RE: Proposed Building for OWNCO Project Number 95003 Dear Interested Party Mildren Design Group is representing OWNCO Marketing for development of a new building on Lots 3, 4, an 5 of Bonita Industrial Park in the J. Hicklin D.L.C. No 43, in the north 1/2, Section 12,T2S,R 1 W, W.M..We are proposing a warehouse/office building for occupancy by OWNCO Marketing at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, June 21, 1995 Red Rock Creek Conference Room City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 7:30 P.M. Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call our office at (503)244-0552 if you have any questions. Sincerely, e Mildren President/Architect 11830 5W Kerr Parkway,Suite 325 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 503/244-0552 Fax 244-0417 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) I, 24 V6 /11/c -� , being duly sworn, depose and say that on S vvWf , 19 95 . I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at Gam✓ �, 4, `r te✓ • tYY/T4 /4'4c7C/2/,4t- MAK' a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office atZ`CLit7■1O, tf / , with postage prepaid thereon. L' ignat e �+ Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of \-11-1--"------' , 19 / . ���-•, OFFICIAL SEAL � � "" SUSAN N.ZUERCHER x.� - Nota Public NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON ?-----•` COMMISSION NO.043365 ommission Expir= : _.�0:-« Da /9`t' MY COMMISSIONf ''XPIRES APR.20,1999 h:\login\jo\aifmaii.c:t g544 3 1H A Andersen .Joseph Fought i FOUGHT COMPANY INC PO Box 23759 PO Box 23759 PO Box 23759 Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97281 / Tigard, OR 97281 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRI L COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL David & Susan Stewart 121 SW Salmon St PO Box 324 24001 Butteville Rd NE , Portland, OR 97204 Columbia City, OR 97018 Aurora, OR 97002 WASHINGTON COUNTY Mgmt-Admi Facilities Milton Brown ,R M & Ivan Starkweather 150 N 1st Ave #B-7 301 NW Murray Blvd 301 NW Murray Blvd Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97229 Portland, OR 97229 IGARD CITY OF PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97281 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: F L`4 F 114. G LcL5 APPLICANT: AGENT: 6 J& 14l LDF t Phone: Phone: (Q4-4 '" 05-5 a PROPERTY LOCATION .41 in I 1 1 6}"' ADDRESS : ' TAX MAP & TAX LOT: (D75 I 14 3 -c2oce, (00 7� a aaG N NECESSARY APPLICATIO S) : SITE DEVEzo?i- 1 17' R rV/G w PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: k//1ReMOOSE /c' irt 80id/�44' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: l� ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: —^ sq. ft. Minimum lot width: 513 ft. Setbacks : front- 30 ft. side- — ft. , rear- - ft. garage- ft. corner- ft. from both streets . Maximum site coverage: Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /5 % Maximum building height: 45 ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless ss lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots/crated as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of Ttfontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: f./from centerline of Established areas Z ft. from Lower intensity,/zones : ft. , along the site' s boundary Page 1 I SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020) : Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A maximum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. PARKING AND ACCESS GIAL,57 + DISIAt- I ./04.030 CL) Required parking for this type of use: c,.)FFite /: 35o Gxi Secondary use required parking: ( JI t(.N(x ! , 106) .050 �p •C7Q0 25% of required spaces may be designated compact-only spaces. Standard parking space dimensions: .-4t. X -ft. Compact parking space dimensions: 41-:1-ft. X-.& ft. X 1 l-L Disabled person parking: All parking areas providing in excess of five required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and designated disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes and Americans with Disabilities Act (see handout) . A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non-residential uses, commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile parking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storge parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: O- q,°l 5,i7Ptcis 30e 'J1bTN Minimum number of accesses : A 74`/6.6 Minimum access width: 24 ft. Maximum access width: 40 ft. Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. Parking area landscaping and screening: Required. See Landscaping section below. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. Page 2 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street' s functional classification. No buildings, signs, trees or other visual obstructions are allowed between 3 and 8 feet above grade in these areas. R_-? LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced.;0 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one tree per seven parking spaces must be planted in and around parking areas in order to provide a canopy effect. Landscaped screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of-way must be provided. BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18 .100. Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area: ft. along north boundary ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary ft. along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along 7.QRx� ,4255 5 Page 3 SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development application. SENSITIVE LANDS Other Agency Permits: ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS SiDarwAIr PpoNEt-TinN) -cry wtil-tot✓ fj?✓tzr D511 Ole PPA T J6t6-H EDRNtc t M t■4, F/c oDPfA IeV,4Tio1 7 Sews/Ti✓t c.A."&s. Li) .RAve sckktsc 14A015e. /g; if<0 souDwAsig. REVIEW PROCEDURES Staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4 PM on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week' s applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 4 :30 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded in advance to 8 .5 by 11 znches!. One 8 . 5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur approximately days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to Page 4 review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of public hearings. A 10 day appeal period follows all decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the .-- AtI■3Wt•361 C6MNUSSIC) A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the Planning Division. theti. ,;: iiiilli6i-t7biif4i;6iiandthe. -fi6eeSi6fthe''-COriference . are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a orospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development. Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to 00derequirement.sappjx4%to submitti.Ru an application Another pre-application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre-application conference, unless is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: V.CA \X)R:eP. PLANNING DIVISION Page 5 24. Personal service 1 space per 500 square feet facilities of gross floor area 25. Research services 1 space for each employee on the largest shift or 1 space per 500 square feet, whichever is larger 26. Retail sales: 1 space for each 1000 square bulky merchandise; feet of gross floor area but i.e., furniture, appliances not less than 10 spaces for each establishment 27. Scrap operations and 1 space per each employee, recycling center but not less than 5 spaces for each establishment 28. Spectator sports and 1 space per 3 seats or 6 entertainment feet of`bench length 29. Transient lodging 1 space for each room plus 1 space and associated uses for each 2 employees - restaurant/lounge 1 space per 100 sq. ft of seating area - banquet/meeting rooms 1 space per 200 sq. ft. of seating - --------�_� area D. Industrial Uses 1. Manufacturing, 1 space per employee of the production, processing largest shift and assembling 2. ' Wholesaling, storage 1 space for each 1, 000 square feet 10 L ,l and distribution of gross floor area within warehouse (plus 1 space per 700 square feet of patron serving area and 1 space per 200 square feet of office area) 3. Mini warehouse 1 space for every 200 square feet of Nk gross office floor area, plus 2 spaces for a caretaker residence. (Ord. 94-07; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 87-04; Ord. 85-07; Ord. 83-52) 18.106.040 Modification to Parking Requirements A. The provisions of this section as to number of spaces may be modified by the approval authority as follows: 1. Compact Car Spaces a. Up to 40 percent of the required parking spaces may be compact spaces; and Revised 04/26/94 Page 240 PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City Engineering Department staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. Unless noted otherwise, the primary contact for questions related to public facility issues is fr` E gineering Department, 639-4171 Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification rights-of-way width specified by the Community Development Code. Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right-of-way for isno4 404 " ��T. /, /571 /4L. 1. to feet from centerline. 2 . to feet from centerline. �'TL� Street improvements: 2 77 `/�p�Qy�r16- 3 1. C.0/Wc491-6 .00P54(4004-street improvements will be necessary along /P?/..7VN GOviz-jam Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. 2 . street improvements will be necessary along Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. Page 6 In some cases where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In these cases, as a condition of development approval, the property owner(s) must execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner' s right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve 1. Pedestrianways/bikeways: ii Sanitary Sewers: The closest sanitary sewer to this property is an B inch line located //,tom 1,u ‘0014f—' The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer' s responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site' s Water Supply: The Tigard Water Diat apt (Phone: 639-1554) or ` kal-a in iFalley r istrict (Phone: 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. The appropriate Water District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City of Tigard has adopted the county' s program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based on the development' s projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The TIF is calculated based on type of use, size of project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5, 000.00. 7; y e6, 9F1'' Page 7 XZ z,ofo. o7 0 S'T• of/43/ x 9900 fC /6.3/ 2 3,090. a7 AmeNsIKAL /Fa/, X , STORMWATER QUALITY FEES/FACILITIES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that a fee and/or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $280. The City of Tigard determines if a fee or facility shall be built. oAl- T 14411 ' „ cc7cA u-oy Necessary storm sewer improvements: ,BD p GAL 5-ro to .04e ig/ 51/.57 5;141 STREET OPENING PERMIT No work within a public right-of-way shall commence until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS On all projects that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot which shall have the elevations of four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PHONE: 639-4171 jo:preapnon 60mr4 YAVMSG/tovA4 UT2 fES 7b 5-175 Page 8 Staff WD Date (76- CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements . This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171 . ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner' s signature/written authorization Vr- C) Title transfer instrument [fi D) Assessor' s map [ ] E) Plot or site plan ['1 F) Applicant' s statement [� (H) Filing fee ($ -SEE Fev) [-3- 50464JLE SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information showing (No. of copies 1i ) : [ ] 1) Vicinity Map [� 2) Site size & dimensions [-i 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [.../ 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [� 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [#-1 b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ ] c) Unstable ground [ ] d) Areas with high seasonal water table [ ] e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ ] f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [ ] 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats [ ] b) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features : a) Rock outcroppings [ ] b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level [' 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [. ] 9) Location and type of on and off-site noise sources [ ] 10) Location of existing utilities and easements [v]""' 11) Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways [-Tr" B) Site Development Plan showing (No. of copies lir ) : [ ] 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties [✓j 2) Contour line intervals [✓]' 3) The location, dimensions and names of all: a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining [.f properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. [/1 c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [ ] 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [�'f b) Parking and circulation areas [�]' c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation [ l— e) Outdoor common areas, [ ] f) Above ground utilities 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all : a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [✓]" b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [-1 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions [4"r- 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [� 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [� 10) The location of mailboxes [ ] 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [� 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ ] C) Grading Plan (No. of copies 1 ? ) [ ] The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done . [Y1 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report [ ] b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals [a' c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ['] D) Architectural Drawings (No. of copies ! O ) : [ ] The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on—site; and [✓]' 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies O ) : [ ] The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [`'1 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings [/f APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 2 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials . [� The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses : 1) Soil conditions . [ ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used . [ ] F) Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18 . 114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ ] G) Traffic generation estimate [ ] H) Preliminary partition or lot line adju tment map showing (No. of Copies ) : 1) The owner of the subject parce [ ] 2) The owner' s authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50, 100 200 feet=1), inch north arrow and date C ] 4) Description of parcel 1 ation and boundaries [ ] 5) Location, width and napies of streets, easements and other public ways w. hin and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all per anent buildings on and within 25 feet of all p .perty lines [ ] 7) Location and wid of all water courses [ ] 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above around level [ ] 9) All slopes • eater than 25% [ ] 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ] 11) For major and partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right-of-way location and width [ ] b) A -caled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ ] 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ ] 13) Ev ' •ence that land partition will not preclude -fficient future land division where applicable [ ] I) Subdivision Preliminar Plat and data showin. (No. of Copies ) : 1) Scale equaling 30,50, .0 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one ahase per sheet [ ] 2) The proposed name • the subdivision [ ] 3) Vicinity map sho ng property' s relationship to arterial and c• lector streets [ ] 4) Names, addres -s and telephone numbers of the owner developer, •ngineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of ap. ication [ ] 6) Boundary ines of tract to be subdivided [ ] 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owner of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land [ ] 8) Cont r lines related to a City-established bench- ma at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater an 10% [ ] APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3 9) The purpose, location, type and size of all of he following (within and adjacent to the propos•: subdivision) : [ ] a) Public and private right-of-ways and e• ements [ ] b) Public and private sanitary and storm'.ewer lines [ ] c) Domestic water mains including fire /drants [ ] d) Major power telephone transmission / nes (50,000 volts or greater) [ ] e) Watercourses [ ] f) Deed reservations for parks, ope space, pathways and other land encumbrances [ ] 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe • izes indicated [ ] 11) Plan of the proposed water distrib tion system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants . [ ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles •howing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond th- limits of the proposed subdivision. / [ ] 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; [ ] 14) The location of all areas s .bject to inundation or storm water overflow [ ] 15) Location, width and direc ion of flow of all water- courses and drainage w.; s [ ] 16) The proposed lot confi• rations, approxmate lot dimensions and lot n bers . Where losits are to be used for purposes o er than residential, it shall be indicated upon suc lots [ ] 17) The location of a trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measure, at 4 feet above ground level, and the location o proposed tree plantings, if any [ ] 18) The existing -es of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the struc res, and a statement of which structures are to r- ain after platting [ ] 19) Supplem- tal information including: a) Pioposed deed restrictions (if any) [ ] b) 'roof of property ownership [ ] c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements [ ] 20) isting natural features including rock out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas . [ ] 21 If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. [ ] J) Other Inf mation [ ] Sol 44 CC Calcuia. ''C.\ (2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 4 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 2.2 OCTOBER 27, 1988 - 7:00 P.M. TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER 4� CAL- St,\(`\ TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL S !jL ,(1� 13125 SW HALL BLVD. ^ tI , �/ y� �Jr,��,yV ►���.p TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1 . General Information CASE: Subdivision 88-07 and Sensitive Lands Permit SL 88-05 REQUEST: For approval of a subdivision request to subdivide 28 .36 acres -into 11 parcels . Also a request for Sensitive Lands Permit to construct a roadway in the floodplain and to prepare parcels for industrial development that are partially within the floodplain. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING DESIGNATION: IL (Light-Industrial) APPLICANT: Thomas H. Burton OWNER: Milton O. Brown 302 Tigard Plaza 301 NW Murray Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97229 LOCATION: SW 74th and SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12BA Tax Lot 100 and 2S1 1 Tax Lot 1400 and 2S1 12AB Tax Lot 1500) 2. Background Information In February 1981, the City approved a zone change from R-7 and M-3 to M-3 (PD) with conditions relating to the development of the property (ZC PD 13-80/Ordinance No. 81-03) . A revised proposal was reviewed in September 1981 and was denied for lack of adequate information (PD 25-81/M 5-81) . In 1983, in conjunction with the adoption of the City' s Comprehensive Plan, the zone of the property was amended from M--3 (PD) to I-L (Light Industrial) . In 1985, the applicant submitted two proposals to divide the subject property into 14 lots and for a Sensitive Lands approval to allow regrading and the development of a road within the 100-year floodplain (File No. S 7-85/SL 5-85) . These two applications were both approved subject to conditions, however, the applicant did not proceed and both approvals have since expired . STAFF REPORT - SL 88-05/S 88-07 - BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) - PAGE 1 3 . Vicinity Information Bonita Road, which is designated as a major collector street, lies immediately to the south and the Burlington Northern/Southern Pacific railroad tracks border the subject property to the east. Industrial zones (I—L and I—H) lie south of Bonita Road, east of the tracks, and along the north property line. Multi—family development within the R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) is immediately west of Fanno Creek . The R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) zone abuts the northwesterly extension of the property (see attached zoning map) . 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The property is roughly L—shaped with the Fanno Creek floodplain located within its southern and western portions . The property is relatively flat and covered with . grass near Bonita Road and trees to the north. The applicant proposes a subdivision with 11 lots abutting the north and east property line and a street located between the lots and 100—year floodplain of Fanno Creek. The subdivision is intended to be developed in two phases with lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the first phase served by a temporary cul—de—sac. The proposal will require a Sensitive Lands review since fill and grading are necessary to raise portions of the lots and the street above the 100—year floodplain. In addition, approval must also be acquired from the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers and the Division of State Lands through a separate review process . At the northern end of the property, the proposed north/south street which begins at Bonita Road will end in a T—intersection. A westerly street stub is proposed to extend to the railroad tracks for the purpose of ultimately being extended across the railroad tracks to connect with Tech Center Drive. The western portion of the T—intersection will proceed west and then north to end at the northern property line. The Comprehensive Plan calls for future street connections between Bonita Road, Hunziker Street, and Hall Blvd. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments : a. The proposed subdivision, a modification of a previous submittal S 7-85 and SL 5-85, has frontage on Bonita Road to the south and extends north along the west side of the Burlington Northern and Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and along the east and north side of Fanno Creek . The entire area is zoned light industrial . STAFF REPORT — SL 88-05/S 88-07 — BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) — PAGE 2 The Bonita Road frontage includes two additional parcels. One is a 30' by 30' parcel owned by the City of Tigard originally utilized for a pump station which is now abandoned . The second, easterly parcel is a 50' by 100' parcel occupied by a church building which covers most of the parcel . b. A portion of the property, including the proposed roadway, is within the 100—year floodplain of Fanno Creek . The applicant proposes to modify the existing channel to increase capacity . Development within the 100—year floodplain requires a Sensitive Lands Permit. The Sensitive Lands ordinance requires that the proposed improvements "shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of zero foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. " The ordinance further requires that the proposed improvements can "not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100—year flood . " The applicant has not submitted a proposal to comply with these requirements. Since the proposed improvements include work within a waterway, a joint permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon, Division of State Lands will be required. c. The proposed street improvements consist of a connection to Bonita Road, (SW Creek Side Drive) just east of the Fanno Creek Bridge and approximately 250 feet west of 74th Avenue, extending north along Fanno Creek. This street intersects to the north with Burlington Way. Burlington Way is stubbed with a knuckle corner to the north, perpendicular to the property line of undeveloped property, and to the east to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, supposedly in alignment with Tech Center Drive . The street stub to the undeveloped property to the north should be aligned parallel with the railroad to avoid additional, unnecessary curves . The Community Development Code requires that stub streets greater than 150 feet in length shall be constructed with a turnaround. d . The City of Tigard Transportation Comprehensive Plan Map has identified a goal to provide a connection between Bonita Road, Hall Boulevard and Hunziker Street. Staff has also identified a need to connect Tech Center Drive across the railroad tracks . This proposed plan is consistent with these goals. The street improvements within the industrial park should be constructed to minor collector street standards to provide adequate lane width for turning movements of trucks and for bike lanes . STAFF REPORT — SL 88-05/S 88-07 — BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) — PAGE 3 e. Bonita Road is a major collector street requiring 60 feet of right-of-way and a 44-foot pavement width. The present crossing of Bonita Road over the railroad tracks is a sharp vertical curve which does not provide adequate sight distance. Bonita Road, as well as the Burlington Northern tracks, will be required to be elevated in order to provide a safe crossing in the future. A profile of Bonita Road should be drawn from 76th Avenue to the railroad tracks to evaluate the impact of the future vertical realignment. Half street improvements should be constructed only where future vertical realignment is not required . Shoulder widening should be performed in the future vertical realignment areas . f. The preliminary plat submitted shows a temporary cul-de-sac constructed north of lot #3 . If the project is to be constructed in phases, a letter of commitment or bond must be provided for the entire project. g. The Storm Drainage Master Plan recommends that improvements to the Fanno Creek Bridge on Bonita Road consist of increasing the opening of the bridge by 40%. This will require increasing the span of the bridge by a similar amount. The alignment of the road shall be required to be shifted to the east in order to allow this increased span to occur. Based on increasing the bridge span equally on both ends, the road would be required to be relocated to where the existing church is located . If the church property were to be incorporated into this application, this would be the preferred location. Since the church has not been incorporated into this application, we recommend shifting Creek Side Drive east, adjacent to the church. The bridge span and creek cross section would therefore be required to be shifted more to the west. A benefit to this alignment would provide access to the church site if the parcel redeveloped. The shifting of the creek cross section and future bridge span should be addressed at this time to ensure that this is a feasible assumption. h. A sanitary sewer line presently exists north from the abandoned pump station to serve this site. The Fanno Creek interceptor trunk line and a line from Tech Center Drive also exists on the property . The Building Inspection Division, General Telephone, NW Natural Gas, and Portland General Electric have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to the request. The Tigard Water District has reviewed the proposal and it has no objections to it and it is noted that Tigard Water District can adequately serve this development and a 8" main will be required along SW Creek Side Drive. A 12" main will be required along Burlington Way with an eventual inter-tie with Tech Center Drive located on the other side of the tracks . No other comments have been received. STAFF REPORT - SL 88-05/S 88-07 - BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) - PAGE 4 B. FINDINGS AND CONCLU )NS The relevant review criteria in this case are contained in Comprehensive Plan policies 2. 1 . 1 , 3 . 2. 1, 3 .2.2, 3 .2. 3, 3 .4. 2, 3 .5. 4, 6.6. 1, 7. 1 .2, 8 . 1 . 1 , and 8. 1 .3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18. 70, 18 .84, 18 . 160, and 18. 164. The State—wide Planning Goals and Guidelines do not need to be directly addressed because the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged by the State. The Planning staff concludes that the proposal as submitted or with minor modifications is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1 . Policy 2. 1 . 1 is satisfied because the NPO and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an adequate opportunity to comment on the applicants proposal . 2. Policies 3 .2 . 1 , 3 .2.2, 3 .2. 3, and 3 .4.2 related to floodplain and wildlife protection shall be addressed in the discussion relating to Section 18. 84 of the Code below. Also, these issues will be further addressed as part of the necessary permit review conducted by the U.S. Corp. of Engineers and the Division of State Lands . An approval through this process must also be granted before the applicant can proceed with this project. 3 . Policy 3 . 5.4 will be met because the required half—street improvements for Bonita Road will accommodate the future bike lane. 4 . Policy 6 .6 . 1 will be met because Fanno Creek and the floodplain provides a natural vegetative buffer between this project and the residences to the south and west. Also, when each of the lots are developed, landscaping will be required as part of the site development review process . 5. Policy 7. 1 .2 is met since adequate water and sewer facilities are available. 6. Policy 8 . 1 . 1 is satisfied because the two street extensions at the north end of the project, with minor alignment modifications, are consistent with the street system contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan. 7 . Policy 8. 1 .3 will be satisfied because the necessary right—of—way dedication and street improvement shall be a condition of final plat approval . Planning staff has determined the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings below: 1 . Chapter 18 .70 is satisfied because the proposal meets the minimum lot size and other related requirements of the I—L zone. STAFF REPORT — SL 88-05/S 88-07 — BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) — PAGE 5 2. Section 18.84.040(a) of the Code contains the following criteria for reviewing a Sensitive Lands proposal within the 100—year floodplain: (a) The land form alteration shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero—foot rise floodway and shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. (b) The land form alteration or development within the 100—year floodplain shall be allowed only in an area designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. (c) Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain, it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100—year flood . (d) The land form alteration or development plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan unless the construction of such pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely. (e) The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood . The staff finds that the proposed development is conceptually consistent with the above criteria for the reasons below: (a) The property is designated Light Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan. (b) The proposed roadway and lots are within the floodplain but are outside of the floodway . (c) The concept appears feasible but specific information relating to grading and flooding impact have not been provided. The applicant' s engineer shall be required to submit detailed information that is sufficient to satisfy the City Engineer that the zero foot rise floodway will be maintained and no rise in flood heights shall result. Additionally, the applicant will need to satisfy the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the Division of State Lands of this as well . STAFF REPORT — SL 88-05/S 88-07 — BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) — PAGE 6 (d) A plan which determines the location of a pedestrian/bicycle path within the Fanno Creek floodplain has not be completed . It is the opinion of the staff that it should be located on the west side of the creek in order to be easily accessible to residential areas . The requirement for sidewalks and room for a bike lane as part of the subdivision street design will also provide access to the creek area. 3 . Chapter 18 . 160 is satisfied because the application lies with the requirement set forth for the submission and approval of a preliminary plat. 4. Chapter 18. 164 will be satisfied during the final plat approval process . The preliminary plat and available information indicate that all City standards can be met. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings and conclusions above, the Planning staff recommends approval of S 88-07 and SL 88-05 subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 15 SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION (STAFF CONTACT: JON FEIGION FOR CONDITIONS 1, 4, 6, and 9; AND GARY ALFSON FOR CONDITIONS 2, 3, 5, 7: 8, and 10 — 15; PHONE 639-4171 . 1 . Additional right—of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the Bonita Road frontage to increase the right—of—way to 30 feet from the centerline. A 60 foot wide right—of—way shall be dedicated for all • subdivision streets . The description for Bonita Road right—of—way shall be tied to the existing right—of—way centerline. The dedication documents shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering division. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering Division. . _ 2. Standard half—street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities, shall be installed along the Bonita Road frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Major Collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the City Engineer. Half street improvements shall be required only on the portion of Bonita Road which does not require vertical realignment. The remaining portion shall be improved with a 3--foot gravel shoulder. Bonita Road, at the entrance to Creek Side Drive, shall be tapered from full width, 22 feet from centerline, to a point 100 feet east of Creek Side Drive. STAFF REPORT — SL 88-05/S 88-07 — BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) — PAGE 7 3 . A profile of Bonita Road shall be required, extending from 76th Avenue to the Southern Pacific railroad tracks showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. Creek Side Drive shall be designed to be able to match the future profile of Bonita Road. 4. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve Bonita Road in the vertical realignment area. 5. Standard full-street improvements, including concrete sidewalks, driveway apron, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities, shall be installed within the subdivision. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector standards and shall conform to the alignment as shown on the submitted drawings except for the following revisions : Creek Side Drive at Bonita Road shall be shifted to the east adjacent to the church property . The existing abandoned pump station shall be modified and incorporated into the street section. The existing alignment of Tech Center Drive shall be shown on the east side of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks . The proposed Burlington Way street shall be renamed to Tech Center Drive and shall align tv± horizontally and vertically with Tech Center Drive across the railroad 9' tracks . The proposed knuckle corner shall not be allowed. A tic' centerline radius of 165 feet shall be utilized in its place. A 45 .7fr ,� foot radius temporary turnaround shall be constructed at the north ; terminus of Burlington Way. ,��/V • 6. Street Centerline Monumentation shall be provided as follows: a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2) , the centerlines of all street and roadway right-of-ways shall be monumented before the City shall accept a street improvement. b. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City standards . The top of all monument boxes shall be set at the design finish grade of the street. c . The following centerline monuments shall be set: (1) All centerline-centerline intersections . Intersections created crossing existing streets shall be set when the centerline alignment of the existing street has been established by or for the City. (2) Center of all cul-de-sacs . (3) Curve points . Point of intersection (P.I. ) when it' s position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise beginning and ending points (B.C. and E.C. ) . STAFF REPORT - SL 88-05/S 88-07 - BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) - PAGE 8 (4) All sanitary and storm structures shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation. 7. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans . Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans . Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed and future lines shall be addressed . Access to the existing storm and sanitary sewer lines shall be provided by public easements . 8 . Detailed engineering data and design drawings for the work within the 100 year floodplain shall be submitted including hydraulic calculations and earthwork volumes showing that the requirements of the Sensitive Lands ordinance have been satisfied and that the bridge span increase, required for a 40% creek channel cross section increase, can be shifted to the west. 9. The area west of the public street 'Creek Side Drive' shall be dedicated as greenway - open space to the City. A monumented boundary survey showing all new title lines, prepared by a registered professional; land surveyor, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to recording. , 10. The applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to perform work on their property on the creek channel changes and reshaping. 11 . A permit shall be obtained by the applicant from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands, (Authority: Section 404, Clean Water Act, and ORS 541 .605 to 541 .695) . A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering division by the applicant. 12. The applicant shall obtain written approval from Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County to connect to the Bonita interceptor prior to issuance of Public Improvement Permit. 13 . Lot 1 shall not be permitted to access directly onto Bonita Road . 14 . Seven (7) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering division for approval . Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans . STAFF REPORT - SL 88-05/S 88-07 - BROWN (INDUSTRIAL PARK) - PAGE 9 15. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering division has approved public improvement plans . The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of commitment, an developer—engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans . THIS APPROVAL IF VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE FINAL APPROVAL DATE. / j j;70,4, PREPAR • BY : Keith S. Liden Senior Planner (br/7639D) STAFF REPORT -- SL 88-05/S 88--07 — BROWN (INDUSTRIAL. PARK) -- PAGE 10 /� • ,� .. . . 1• .1- - A •• • • •\�. • _c] -�-� ',. \ [41 1111111.11 it tir • • •It • ,l \ , T' r Motu N• . ._.• • • �••ti`.� 90.4`.•. • /�� ! t i PtNL LEWIS ( _.� . T• i•j//�� r I '� • • { /r ��r �`. ELEMENTARY ! I i t 1 - r.. ''',' • ii . 1 \. • -1. °S..1-W--," .--I-I 1- : mo gill' . ./ : s\// ". '''''''••••.1•ate •••••M \ i \ \ ._ Js • "..a_1.���MtD�' L '-, [.----; . . — -ir---j—ies, !:`, I r- • • •• •• \ • \ T 1 jj• I !N.• • 1•• • _•. t" tiw_r. 1` • t ` \ _ �t mum. 1'•••Ery .F ••I I .• ,•.• • ,,I , / ....p - il. (13 \n• j 3SJ` .• sw. • • ` '- -1. �p- - t .�_ / - ! 1'1. ! • 11.1.1 I .. ` `�� , o1rwR I t__ . L. i i - �-T^ • . .. . 51.•w •w. . 'f - ' • • 161\ ;; ;;41te �p�11/� - -4 ter. l • i h..- 3 - / , ]i. / . -. s� •® -�E - 1'1 V. 't t--S°' �r�Y i 4 ii\ . '\ -A '� ' . I..••Md '.) f•.'\V X r te' Lr ` -1} , ,.t` • sw .r![ J1t\ r • -. •. Swya\5}J� • 1•. t �, •i- .J; . .. . : R-7 ,-• L •' .1� r 1 — •t =i iii i aaf - � i. f i • — 1 y1 .ya.'1, `� r , u l . ..„ it t . ;- ` 1t.• a• ••••■ CI 1 PD/: \ 1� • 1. I i i �T�T �_ li = 1 T '1 �ll . -�t — ' ` 4. A-ice ' ,Q_7 :`r. %- . . ,: — 1 ) b • BURTON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING • Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors 302 Tigard Plaza • Hall Blvd. & Pacific Hwy. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503-639-6116 A% APPLICATION STATEMENT September 20 , 1988 City of Tigard Planning Department City Hall Tigard , Oregon Herewith Sensitive Land Application and Subdivision Application for Bonita Park, proposed Industrial Subdivision Located on SW Bonita Road near SW 74th. Ave. This subdivision was previously approved and sensitive lands application was also previously approved. However, this approval has expired , necessitating this new application . This application is nearly the same as previously approved , but with some modifications due to wetland locations and U.S . Corps of Engineer ' s requirements . We have had a wetlands study made by Scientific Resources , Inc. , recognized by the U.S . Corps of Engineers and State Land Board , for use in determining our layout . ] • We have also at this time submitted an application to the U. S . Corps of Engineers for their approval . The proposed subdivision does not anticipate a railroad crossing, but instead a street exit at the northerly portion of the property for eventual hookup with roadway system in that area . Part of the road construction is .proposed in the flood plane area , but outside of the floodway area and was previously approved on our expired sensitive lands permit . Thomas H. Burton For: Milton 0 . Brown cc : Milton 0 . Brown I > ) WETLAND DELINEATION AT THE PROPOSED BONITA INDUSTRIAL PARK AT S.W. 74TH AVENUE AND BON TA ROAD 1 • PREPARED BY: Scientific Resources, Inc. Suite 375 11830 S.W. Kerr Parkway Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 SRI PROJECT 8832 September 6, 1988 (503) 245-4068 PREPARED FOR: Milton O. Brown 3012 N.W. Murray Road Portland, OR 97229 1.0 INTRODUCTION Scientific Resources, Inc. (SRI) was asked by Burton Engineering and { Surveying, representing Milton O. Brown, to assess the presence of wetland on a proposed development site near S.W 74th Avenue and Bonita Road.- The site is bounded by S.W. Bonita Road on the south, on the east by the Southern Pacific/Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, and on the west by Fanno Creek. The total development site is 28.36 acres. The preliminary design of the development incorporates a substantial park area adjacent to Fanno Creek throughout its length as it crosses the property. These areas will not be filled or excavated. Because no impact of regulatory concern is anticipated in these areas, they were not surveyed by SRI for the purpose of wetland identification. Only those areas west and north of the proposed roadway alignment were evaluated. 2.0 METHODS The approach of SRI to determine whether there is wetland on the proposed fill site was to use the routine approach in the Corps of Engineers wetland delineation method (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987). The method requires the finding of wetland plant indicator species, hydric soils and demonstration of saturated soils in the zone of typical root growth (0-10 in) to establish the presence of wetland. Estimates of the approximate percent cover of overstory, shrub or herbaceous levels where present were made to determine plant species dominance. An August 1, 1987 listing of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Wetland Plant List (Reed 1986) for the Pacific Northwest Region was used to assess the indicator status of observed dominant plants. Vegetation on the site was reconnoitered on July 26, August 2, 9, and September 6 1988 with samples collected at the sample points indic at ed on Figure 1 accompanying data in the Appendix. Wetland plant species on the basis of cover and their FWS indicator status m each stratum were recorded on Corps { of Engineers data sheets (see Appendix). Distances to Fanno Creek, the Railroad right-of-way, and property fence corners were estimated; these features served as reference points for observations. A judgment of whether or not each sampling point qualified as a wetland was then made, based on vegetation. Soils information for the site was obtained from the Washington County Soil Survey (SCS 1975) and from site visits and was compared with the USDASCS Hydric Soils listing (USDASCS 1986). Based on initial recconaissance of the site topography and vegetation, soils were sampled in relation to those areas potentially existing as wetland. Soil sample sites are shown in Figure 1 and listed on the data sheets in the Appendix. One foot diameter pits were excavated at each soil sampling site to a depth of at least 20 inches. After soil pit excavation, a time interval ranging from 1.0 hours to 3.0 hours was allowed to pass before the level of any water in the pits was measured from the vegetation root-mass/soil contact and recorded. Recorded water levels were used along with soils and vegetation data to delineate the preliminary wetland boundary. Scientific Resources - 1 - i 1 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS This section describes both the general and specific environmental conditions existing on-site related to the presence and extent of wetland. This information derives from the most recent and accurate data available. 3.1 Topography The proposed development site is situated within and adjacent to the floodplain of Fanno Creek, a tributary of the Tualatin River. Elevations over the site do not vary greatly (maximum approx. 145 feet msl). All areas within the proposed development site slope gently toward the channel of Fanno Creek (at or near 130 feet msl). The only major topographic changes over the site are the result of terraces formed by Fanno Creek. The 100 year floodplain defines the largest of the terraces (Figure 1). Maximum changes in elevation observed along this break range from 2.0 to 3.0 feet. Minor, more seasonal terraces are found closer and adjacent to Fanno Creek. 3.2 Hydrology The hydrology of the proposed development site is governed primarily by the channel and flow of Fanno Creek. In this portion of the Fanno Creek watershed, 1 meanders are common -- the systems way of distributing sediment loads. The significance of meandering for site hydrology is that the point bar areas are apt to be saturated at a more shallow depth than the areas adjacent to and away from cutbanks. Only a small portion of the site, mainly at the southern end of the property, occupies these point bar areas. The general flow direction of Fanno Creek is also of importance to site hydrology. At the northwest end of the property, the creek flows east-southeast then bends toward the south and south-southeast, eventually exiting the site and crossing S.W. Bonita Road. The significance of the creek flow direction is that the entire proposed development area is located on the outside (east) of the bend in the creek, resulting in an area of erosion and deeper water tables. The contrast between the east side of the creek (proposed site) and the west side illustrates the importance of this aspect of site hydrology. The west side is on the inside of the overall bend of the creek where water tables are shallow and sizeable ponds are maintained. Based on soil sampling pits located at various locations, water tables throughout the site are deeper than 16.0 inches from the vegetation-soil interface. 3.3 Site Soils The soils of the site belong to the McBee-Chehalis and the Woodburn- Quatama-Willamette soil associations. The approximate boundary dividing the two soil associations is closely related to the large terrace east of Fanno Creek. Adjacent to Fanno Creek west of this terrace are the "well drained to poorly drained soils on nearly level flood plains and bottom lands" defining the Mcbee-Chahalis association Scientific Resources - 2 - i (SCS 1975). The soils east of and up-gradient from the terrace are the Woodburn- Quatama-Willamette association being "well drained to poorly drained soils on nearly level to moderately steep terraces" (SCS 1975). Pertinent to a wetland determination are the specific soil mapping units within the more general soil associations. Quatama barns on 0 - 3 percent slopes (mapping unit 37A) are the soils east of the large terraced area. The representative soil profile selected by the SCS for this particular soil unit is located approximately 8.0 miles west of the proposed site. These relatively deep soils have formed in mixed alluvium on old terraces and are classified as mixed, mesic Aquultic Haploxeralfs (SCS 1975). Permeability values range from 0.6 to 2.0 inches per hour within the top 15 inches, high water tables from December to April are found at depths of 2.0-3.0 feet. McBee silty clay barns (mapping unit 30) are found in the lowland areas adjacent to and surrounding the channel of Fanno Creek. Thes are mixed, mesic Cumulic Ultic Haploxerolls (SCS 1975), formed in alluvium on flood plains and so are found along the larger streams in the county. Therefore, flooding of these soils is frequent from November to May, with high streambank erosion potential. Water tables are, however, as deep as 2.0 to 3.0 feet during the winter rainy season. Permeability values range from 0.6 to 2.0 inches per hour. Soil characteristics recorded on-site by Scientific Resources, Inc. are given in the data sheets in the Appendix, beginning at the western-most portion of the property and working downstream (see Figure 1). With respect to observed wetland soils found on-site, the characteristics of the soil associated with a small and narrow depression along the northern portion of the property where Fanno Creek Runs west-east (sample point #2) indicate wetland conditions. From 0 - 10 inches, the soil color is 10YR 4/2 with deep-red mottles (7.5YR 5-6/6) approximately 0.5-1.5 mm in diameter. This layer is a dense, sticky, slightly moist silty-clay, and the roots of the ground-cover plants do not extend deeper than this layer. From 10 - >16 inches is a very stongly bound and dense layer of very dark brown-black (10YR 2/1) clay with no visible mottles. 3.4 Site Vegetation Two general classes of vegetation exist on-site: grassland and forest. A listing of the specific vegetation types is given in Table 1 along with each species USFWS wetland indicator status as reported by Reed (1986). A great deal of the property has been used at some point in the past for grazing cattle. These areas continue to be dominated by a mixture of field grasses. Fescue (Festuca rubra), Bunchgrass (Agropvron repens), Bentgrass (Agrostis spp.), and Timothy Phleum pratense) are among the most common of these field grasses. They are mainly in the south and central parts of the property, extending from the creek margin to the eastern property line. Forest covers the area of the site north of the approximate north-south centerline, continuing to the extreme western boundary. Oregon White Oak (Quercus garrvana), Douglas Fir (Pseudoptsuga menziesii), and Oregon Ash (Fraxinus latifolia) are the primary forest cover species, respectively occurring in decreasing order of Scientific Resources - 3 - dominance. Forest, including the shrub understory, which is dominated by Himalayan Blackberry (Rubus discolor), extends to the margins of Fanno Creek (and/or property line) through this distance. The dominant plant species associated with a small wetland area found along a shallow and narrow depression adjacent to Fanno Creek, where the creek runs east west on the northern portion of the property, are listed in the following table. Given also is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wetland indicator status for each of those species: Common Name Scientific Name USFWS Status Hawthorn Crataegus sp. NOL-FAC OregonAsh Fraxinui latifolia FACW Soft Rush Juncus effuses FACW+ Himalayan Blackberry Rubus discolor NOL Poison Oak Rhus diversiloba NOL Willow Saliz sp. FAC-OBL Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata FAC 4.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Wetlands that have been identified on-site, as identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory are shown in Figure 2. Only the area immediately within the riparian zone of Fanno Creek has been identified (Riverine system, upper perrenial subsystem, open water class, non-tidal intermittently exposed/permanent water regime). These wetland areas are resticted to the channel of Fanno Creek and are outside the proposed development impact area. Based on field sampling within the'proposed developmet area, only one small wetland area was identified by SRI (see Figure 1). This area is a narrow depression which extends northwest off Fanno Creek along the north-central area of the property. The depression does not appear to be a seasonal stream channel. Rather, it is most likely a seasonal slough or backwater of Fanno Creek during the high water periods in winter. The area of the wetland that would be affected by the proposed road alignment is 0.003 acres. The remainder of the wetland on the creek side of the road would remain in park. Specific soils and vegetation characteristics of the identified J wetland area are given in the data sheets.in the Appendix. l Scientific Resources - 4 - I e..6---- SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES, I , ' • ; • -- 2,.----.-• . : •-• • . 7...... . .4/ v ...4. ..."--romilg • i ..-• • •••-1/421,96 'I•-•.- •••• - NS.,,,,S, • .• •1.. -I,,,o/ . •• • • • 41 ...* Air • - .. . • ... ..-. . \ -. .'f-.1....-.., . , 1...1.0:-.-k'....":%:-::-.•:-. •N, i. • • .....- #.- m..._fti....ji . ••• ' - ;.:-.:,.. ....;....,.: - •.7"4; ,A.41P, „,...or ,, .• .1y...., • a -..• , • - •• .• II • )1.4e9.7.4,k ...• • • IZt A1411•01r44.•.; ••• • % • all# i:tri>• " .PE144 1 .a• •:.• ...// •,•••74-:Ce&MIY• 11804 .:.. • • 1‘,..f#4 .../ . :... . ! .N Sch. . 41 I ;4.-.•4.14.•-',7 Y c;•.:s.■....•.••.-:'.::A••c-••,•*••"4•.•••,•,•,•.i•..•.•r•..• •..••••.•• •l III ..••4MO . Ii, &.,.-. • .• Ii&-ltr '. • . . . ,.., • •..- . . -, cz., • 'Timm'so ■. ••!*.le...:.---..r;_ • L.,„ LO ..f, • • ,.... .-•:.a • 410 • .:1.-- - --• . I isposaig • :-,A,.....VI 4.• V'' :• :". ,•'i • ••.•:: • 7; 1 - • :-4. •--• • ".•.-. • :1,.,,,..;;Br..V.2.1.."1(.."....,..1!.--' 4) • • •-4, • . '' ,... ,wr ••••••, _i . .p••. ., , . • .1 • ... ,,- • - - in-: ...•• .. .___, •-..: ...• • •• ,„ • • ,• „, - _ .• , . ry ri.•-.,t.•.•••ti, ,. .. - ,... .... •,; ,. ..,,,„,....• _ •...,,,,,,,.... y, istpi.e.,. . al K. x. , .,.., . . , • c" .:,, %‘1..s...•:::.• ,. •..., •-: ••••'.. ../... .•. , . . ..V--... - --- • • A 'lb <%.,..•A\., ...1.. : ..• - '.• -4 '-''.:/P"-t T ".. r 1).F0.1Y • .. • .-1,1 i ...:. - r....-4.-..% " .' • ‘tr•v•..r:\qa .".* -'. • ' *- ' - • 's - .-• . .• u .• 0 4e• .- '. ‘. . • .."# ..QK .. •f•-.....reet:ve :Ir.•. •• •••-: • :1''. -.. '••••• . '''• •"*. Odin(Z h ' ....••-•%"': * '• . • !; , • ••• .I,-•• •••!....4 '• ' ..;••••. A 0*At•.sP-44,••• ...s e...:. .,••.'...• -41.-7r-C3151z7t#1-.0 • • •. ' #4,---... . ..., 804.•...:',69 • - ...- ...-. •'.!,•-:_• '77% '•••7• 1.-....d)`.--.... .. ... 1.1 . ' •" ' ##4S • • ,.... ' ....- • •......."1 •:•.?..10". ' :......0 • -1,. •..:•' : •• 1 ..:. • V.,7••• 4 I riel/§4 11 % •• •• .-41.--"tre" 6...•14,,_...• e'6...-...'-• ..... . ' ..•6 1-*" i- ..-iv 4' • .1 "...." .- \1 ...... m. 11:. ■:•....1.L .... ■--:Pr-.-... 411521-. . .4,....4,..:,, • • ._-.1,4,*----.2•.: : ----...._:•:_z7.7.2 ,4:FL__Allik ,. I' :-"'-'•-; :.....ia...:.,... .,-,-...,;z--.,-;.-.41-.3-.•.-."-•...4-- "0- -oi :-...-1 ••-f .---... • - ,-x.7 11/4\fir--- -' • • .- „ • , ,- ., Iti,.. . 4: - •-:.-7:. : .. ---t•'-•• •k-&-ri-- ..-r:4 - ' - "-* " - - • : „........,...s...!---"..."-...._.,..•,...;.:,• ;....-;:f,a'.. • -:Bon't,,,,> . : ..:- ":41#%I. -.1`.). • • • • ..,,..- - -...... . .. -• .I • • : •. X. • '' •:••• j :''... 1.- .'"! •N " ‘11 • 'i s••••s ., • • .. • / - 1■••• ,, ••r..' ..',4 .1 4...1 1 4•40 ' ..:. 4....r.._ ......"71er t.'..'' .e,. ...•----•••• - --0 ., - •. .• 0 I T •,..,---,--;""' goidtrA• , .. „i.„..,..• . . •.•..•4 Ls 1. %.1, . ....;• 'rrs •,. ....:::A .. . .• . !twilit-sr Jr: - "; -- • ,.. , • e'''...-.4 .j. ' . '. .":f • #.1 "&;; , - r! 77•:•••••%JP,..• f•.17.,t• ••••':' / /4 .•,...:,....:....,;::':,' t'•I'0'4.1• • ...''• II • !•••4044 me. Illi .A....... . ..r.004 , .. i. ,,f- . .:.,.i . ....:.. ..,.. ......„,, -• . ter-" po.-_,..., L 4. •-•-‘-' 1 i..•,frl 1.4,&• !''fr•- - • • --.... •• . . _ .t • • 1 -or- ., . . i . . t . •.• .... ., !....-,„ . :.../„..- 11, •• ,/,.... „ .- • . ' 71,0 ‘;• • :\i,, - ,..... , • •.,‘A,,,,, ... .. ••41 ..4.., ,.. I • • •• •4• w• .........• ' .- lit:'' 7 ••.....N.' •' ....,■../..'', •1 . , C .:IL•\. 17%...•• •-' : ' •1'j'" I : "..# • ', •, ' ••„.• • 'V • • • i i.. POWK • -I : ..' 41 ccv-• . • :•• j . 400 .-',,','•.-4-* .'.f...; •.•....:i.‘":.•-•- ':-.7-::::::7-1...".". •--/-* /..."••":*** • .. SAY- --•171.°yr.f• •'. . ...-.:..... -I!,- - 2 ..... -. - • --..‘...7 ...1- P.'VI MSC •I •. ; ' ..-V)," •. r7-•.• 1'6'7.: -' ..7-6.. w t . e ' -• 1 : ... , •,67. i t; •.10 6.6 ,!... '.. ;• • , • , 4c1 .• '.; / . 1.: '' ••••••• : 6"-1.11.30W ' 't •1 • _____,,,,........... .. . .; / ;• i '. ...-----.-'••••• .,. I I' . .• • , ! • •• '• " .1.::. ". • •••:. 0 ' '''' --.7; : • :. Zir‘.,7 \ ..vi • 12/01 /• ...,....);_.• , .. . .. . , . 1 in.4 211 • •`....../ • ..A I . ::.* . --- . 1 / ...j....... .,./. - e 1-, . . .•-r-* - - ---:. • : • 3■••I j 8 i . 4,.1/4• .• ... .. • • • . • - A'. ,SW Is DJIRJ-fAy -„....J.•."44„. ; ....• ROA 9--. .b.. .. . . . ..„..,y . . I , . , : • '' . • • •l;;PF•rr'•- .1 . . ' ._,"• • iidhl ; • :.. . .:• ! PFOUI • .. -.?-'':; --- :- \',..47" • . ... . • tuor . .l.fligh Sefr . -'.-.-- 15",..-.,>/ 't •• -..--- ',...--'• ../... .1 -". ' .OW . 1 ---" * POW Zx . -. - . I •- ; e4.Yq ] 7.-,-- , ..: 4- ' • .\----..: =• .7.•.'-,t-1 • . `N. - *-- a • . - :' • , . I . -- • '• -"e"--- 7...---- :' ''' • 'Oa/_ e.po ax,' .,4:7. , .'.; 1, •'... . !'.1•'..1. ---•, --::----5-■-• : ' .•-t..• 4:'..s. •- .... : ,•....,.." '--:e.0 --1.1 .. - •'. - ;Grave-1 : Pit;.„, • .. „sa-.... • • ...x...<0.• . -- ..... .:.------- • . irrN, • • -' - - / • _A/. •-/.1 --•--- • . - - •...... • • •• ...„.......,,;7.',.-..--• •••;„:„.irt.....z. .il• ••1 0 t r f„0 ••.ra.;•14 •.' i ti , ., 1---.16 •'....•• . 501 1 . ••••• - - •.!: R. 2 OW! . PtMIV ....... '. .40....... • / • .... i..41).;...:-1-•-.. ..., •dr "1 PC01 Y' ' .J I% \ \s 7 ! I k • ' ,44.- ii3'-'7 Pi •!, 1, • ' !/!.•• • ‘... I- .i•-•••••:,.•-;1-':7A....--;4-. - d;;...i) . ..• ...- • 1.1 I . -... , - , mo 4---- • 1 A• : .1 Figure 2. USFWS National Wetland Inventory Map of the proposed development site (Beaverton Quadrangle) . 5.0 REFERENCES Reed, Porter B., Jr. 1986. 1986 wetland plant list Northwest Region. Prepared by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL WELUT 86/W13.09, May 1986. Soil Conservation Service. 1976. Soil survey of Washington County, Oregon. U. S. Department of Agriculture in cooperation with Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. Prepared by the Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Washington, D.C. 100 pp + Appendices. U. S. D. A. Soil Conservation Service. 1985. Hydric soils of the United States 1985. In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. • • I J Scientific Resources 5- CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s) : S 88-07 and SL 88-05 2. Name of Owner: Milton 0. Brown 3. Name of Applicant: Thomas H. Burton Address 302 Tigard Plaza City Tigard State OR Zip 97223 4. Location of Property: Address 7495 SW Bonita Legal Description 2S1 12BA, 100; 2S1 1, 1400; 2S1 12AB, 1500 5. Nature of Application: For subdivision approval to subdivide 28.36 acres into 11 parcels. Also, for sensitive lands approval to construct a roadway in the rloodpiain and to reduce the elevation of grade of some lots. Zone: I-L. 6. Action: Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: xx The applicant & owners xx Owners of record within the required distance xx The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization xx Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON November 28, 1988,UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(b) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. November 28, 1988 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department , 639-4171. O257P/0O06P BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR ) SUBDIVISION APPROVAL AND SENSITIVE ) NO. 88-07 ;SL 88-05 LANDS PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVI- ) SION AND CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD; ) Thomas H. Burton, applicant. ) The above-entitled matter came before the hearings officer at the regularly scheduled meeting of October 27, 1988 , in the Tigard Civic Center Town Hall Room, in Tigard, Oregon; and The applicant requests subdivision approval and a sensitive lands permit to construct a roadway in the floodplain and to prepare parcels for industrial development on property zoned IL, Light Industrial, and described as Tax Lot 100 , Map 2S1, Section 12BA, and Tax Lot 1400, Map 2S1, Section , Tax Lot 1500, Map 2S1, Section 12AB, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon; and The hearings officer conducted a public hearing on October 27 , 1988, at which time testimony, evidence and the planning department staff report were received; and The hearings officer adopts the findings of fact and conclusions contained in the staff report, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" and incorporated by reference herein; and NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Subdivision 88-07 and SL 88-05 be and are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 15 SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING 1 DIVISION (STAFF CONTACT: JON FEIGION FOR CONDITIONS 1, 4 , 6 AND 9 ; GARY ALFSON FOR CONDITIONS 2, 3 , 5, 7, 8 AND 10-15, PHONE 639-4171) 1. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to the public along the Bonita Road frontage to increase the right of way to 30 feet from the centerline. A 60 foot wide right of way shall be dedicated for all subdivision streets. The description for Bonita Road right of way shall be tied to the existing right of way centerline. The dedication documents shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering division. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering Division. 2 . Standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities, shall be installed along the Bonita Road frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Major Collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the City Engineer. Half street improvements shall be required only on the portion of Bonita Road which does not require vertical realignment. The remaining portion shall be improved with a 3-foot gravel shoulder. Bonita Road, at the entrance to Creek Side Drive, shall be tapered from full width, 22 feet from centerline, to a point 100 feet east of Creek Side Drive. 3 . A profile of Bonita Road shall be required, extending from 76th Avenue to the Southern Pacific railroad tracks showing 2 the existing grade and proposed future profile of Bonita Road. 4 . An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner' s right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve Bonita Road in the vertical realignment area. 5. Standard full-street improvements, including concrete sidewalks, driveway apron, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities shall be installed within the subdivision. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector standards and shall conform to the alignment as shown on the submitted drawings except for the following revisions: Creek Side Drive at Bonita Road shall be shifted to the east adjacent to the church property. The existing abandoned pump station shall be modified and incorporated into the street section. The City shall make the property available for this improvement. The existing alignment of Tech Center Drive shall be shown on the east side of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. The proposed Burlington Way street shall be renamed to Tech Center Drive and shall align horizontally and vertically with Tech Center Drive across the railroad tracks. The proposed knuckle corner shall not be allowed. A centerline radius of 165 feet shall be uti- lized in its place. A 45 foot radius temporary turnaround shall be constructed at the north terminus of Burlington Way. 6. Street Centerline Monumentation shall be provided as 3 follows: a. In accordance with ORS 92 . 060(2) , the centerlines of all street and roadway rights of way shall be monumented before the City shall accept a street improvement. b. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City standards. The top of all monument boxes shall be set at the design finish grade of the street. c. The following centerline monuments shall be set: (1) All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections created crossing existing streets shall be set when the centerline alignment of the existing street has been established by or for the City. (2) Center of all cul-de-sacs. (3) Curve points. Point of intersection (P. I. ) when it ' s position falls inside the limits of the pavement, otherwise beginning and ending points (B.C. and E. C. ) (4) All sanitary and storm structures shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation. 7 . Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm draining basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed and future lines shall be addressed. Access to the existing storm and sanitary sewer lines shall be provided 4 by public easements. 8 . Detailed engineering data and design drawings for the work within the 100 year floodplain shall be submitted including hydraulic calculations and earthwork volumes showing that the requirements of the Sensitive Lands ordinance have been satisfied and that the bridge span increase, required for a 40% creek channel cross section increase, can be shifted to the west. 9 . The area west of the public street "Creek Side Drive" shall be dedicated as greenway-open space to the City. A monumented boundary survey showing all new title lines, prepared by a registered professional land surveyor shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to recording. 10. The applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to perform work on their property on the creek channel changes and reshaping. 11. A permit shall be obtained by the applicant form the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands, (authority: Section 404 , Clean WAter Act, and ORS 541. 605 to 541. 695) A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Subdivision by the applicant. 12 . The applicant shall obtain written approval from Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County to connect to the Bonita interceptor prior to issuance of Public Improvement Permit. 13 . Lot 1 shall not be permitted to access directly onto Bonita Road. 5 14 . Seven sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvement shall be submitted to the Engineering division for approval. Two sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. 15. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering division has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE FINAL APPROVAL DATE. DATED this day of November, 1988 . HEARINGS OFFICER APPROVED: - i BETH MASON 6 ,0 �N �G� �q, 5 faro i 9 '1'cj, X0,9 S1TE PL¢N ■ `•- 0.6• ACRES Off, O kiL:S.7\7Pi0\4 oi 'Q 9. ta k i Jr ? ANA Tea 0 Alt-y A•,, 'o # . i■ t N i 4-C.:I!. .� : .80ACRES .244c■ S tIO —0_ -0• I � 1 � 14♦ VO ,• 0,87AGRES Q O Ø1*t% c: 40 �' „ 7 • � . ■ �. ACRES 416„. #itiNt: \ 140 , rrf 44 , , .., Soil 5 y , .4`c j \_30 . . \. .. . Of 9 �. 'ef 1 1.38 ACRES , pi f • 1 ��' �/ �Q°o, •..C11:1) \\,. .\ 4 es t`0 a. , */ iree5 %\ ,, NC—* , ,,,-s„1.... ,,. ,«. .. . 1.26 ACRC�'It p \`� phi:.„,:tti:,.: top a `�L`' tt` -[VM�RAR 4144, �v GUt.OiZ -SSA Z8 , , 4,w+, -lel 0. .off . .CRt: . if 4 .74 I ilk ,< 7`k'.r * 0' : eo c ti 4/` ' , ,,',„# \ II lif , -0"6,, '..)14,,,, 60' OAUS \ f 1 50 Tr V TV, I . 0■ I V1e. kiti I AA • .", \s\\___NI kg ipe, iA‘E-1';..vi aii51--4 I I#13° It o BON%TA II �_To Hall Blvd. h S. W 46,4..: W a ,5,../e 474; ryeiVaiil. iweeir. .e , , 4. ,,.. . ineal-ea or -5(-/e"/".r/4 t- cc-,., , c eS, lr'c. 3 N e AMIN, . . ......................7 ....- 1 . - • • �O� • • • i . C 9-Dc\) 1 o qcc' i 227 ,. - . . • . . _ i . • I Z S"rb1l--'1r gyp` r i it 32g 1 I 1 ` • ♦ ♦ . a AA`l a A. A !4 iI 1 .77' A'/L7oA/ CT ! -S ........r_._. MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. 11830 SW Kerr Parkway,Suite 325 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 bl°`� FD. I.R. 0. 25 N 20°26'30"E \ _.-.\r \ LOT 5 \ 43562 S.F. \ 0 \ ' 0� \\ \ /d'� ;5c5. \\ \ \\L5\7 LO 4441\ ` \ � \\ \ 's � LOT 4 \ \\ \\ \c5) 43561 S. F. ` 0 - - \ \ \ \ 2 -� \ \ ,L �� 0'I \ - \\ � �\� \ � � 7 7 sue' .,s �•c \\ v' \ \ 4\ '-' '. Off, eri/N �O \ \ \ \ -... S1/4....5-----9> ',,\ 1\ \ \\ �' \ .R' , "E \ '()-\ \ ',: , 6' `\ 3°46 Q5 ` s ` ` < \ LOT 3 - \\ \-7 \ \ `�%\ ` 'o �� � )5 �� 43557 S. F. F.�`� �° \\ in rri N \4'�` \ �� /L), LPG' GC \ C`• o d- \ sF��\\ � � � ,�� tor° 2cD s \ eo \ ��A\`�° \\ \�QQ� 2 0\\ .5) L9, \d\ --5`ab \��\ \ � \�'\ \ x \57 \ '' ''D ., \ ��'� LOT 2 1 i 1 T-- E ___--- , ,-, ___--- __------- _........ ArAir 9 BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR ) SUBDIVISION APPROVAL AND SENSITIVE ) NO. 88-07 ;SL 88-05 LANDS PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVI- ) SION AND CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD; ) Thomas H. Burton, applicant. ) The above-entitled matter came before the hearings officer at the regularly scheduled meeting of October 27, 1988, in the Tigard Civic Center Town Hall Room, in Tigard, Oregon; and The applicant requests subdivision approval and a sensitive lands permit to construct a roadway in the floodplain and to prepare parcels for industrial development on property zoned IL, Light Industrial, and described as Tax Lot 100 , Map 2S1, Section 12BA, and Tax Lot 1400, Map 251, Section , Tax Lot 1500, Map 2S1, Section 12AB, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon; and The hearings officer conducted a public hearing on October 27, 1988, at which time testimony, evidence and the planning department staff report were received; and The hearings officer adopts the findings of fact and conclusions contained in the staff report, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" and incorporated by reference herein; and NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Subdivision 88-07 and SL 88-05 be and are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 15 SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING 1 • DIVISION (STAFF CONTACT: JON FEIGION FOR CONDITIONS 1, 4 , 6 AND 9 ; GARY ALFSON FOR CONDITIONS 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 AND 10-15, PHONE 639-4171) 1. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to the public along the Bonita Road frontage to increase the right of way to 30 feet from the centerline. A 60 foot wide right of way shall be dedicated for all subdivision streets. The description for Bonita Road right of way shall be tied to the existing right of way centerline. The dedication documents shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering division. Dedication forms and instructions are available from the Engineering Division. 2 . Standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities, shall be installed along the Bonita Road frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Major Collector street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the City Engineer. Half street improvements shall be required only on the portion of Bonita Road which does not require vertical realignment. The remaining portion shall be improved with a 3-foot gravel shoulder. Bonita Road, at the entrance to Creek Side Drive, shall be tapered from full width, 22 feet from centerline, to a point 100 feet east of Creek Side Drive. 3 . A profile of Bonita Road shall be required, extending from 76th Avenue to the Southern Pacific railroad tracks showing 2 the existing grade and proposed future profile of Bonita Road. 4. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve Bonita Road in the vertical realignment area. 5. Standard full-street improvements, including concrete sidewalks, driveway apron, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights and underground utilities shall be installed within the subdivision. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to minor collector standards and shall conform to the alignment as shown on the submitted drawings except for the following revisions: Creek Side Drive at Bonita Road shall be shifted to the east adjacent to the church property. The existing abandoned pump station shall be modified and incorporated into the street section. The City shall make the property available for this improvement. The existing alignment of Tech Center Drive shall be shown on the east side of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. The proposed Burlington Way street shall be renamed to Tech Center Drive and shall align horizontally and vertically with Tech Center Drive across the railroad tracks. The proposed knuckle corner shall not be allowed. A centerline radius of 165 feet shall be uti- lized in its place. A 45 foot radius temporary turnaround shall be constructed at the north terminus of Burlington Way. 6. Street Centerline Monumentation shall be provided as 3 follows: a. In accordance with ORS 92. 060 (2) , the centerlines of all street and roadway rights of way shall be monumented before the City shall accept a street improvement. b. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box conforming to City standards. The top of all monument boxes shall be set at the design finish grade of the street. c. The following centerline monuments shall be set: (1) All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections created crossing existing streets shall be set when the centerline alignment of the existing street has been established by or for the City. (2) Center of all cul-de-sacs. (3) Curve points. Point of intersection (P.I. ) when it's position falls inside the limits of the pavement, otherwise beginning and ending points (B.C. and E. C. ) (4) All sanitary and storm structures shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation. 7. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm draining basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed and future lines shall be addressed. Access to the existing storm and sanitary sewer lines shall be provided 4 by public easements. 8. Detailed engineering data and design drawings for the work within the 100 year floodplain shall be submitted including hydraulic calculations and earthwork volumes showing that the requirements of the Sensitive Lands ordinance have been satisfied and that the bridge span increase, required for a 40% creek channel cross section increase, can be shifted to the west. 9. The area west of the public street "Creek Side Drive" shall be dedicated as greenway-open space to the City. A monumented boundary survey showing all new title lines, prepared by a registered professional land surveyor shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to recording. 10. The applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to perform work on their property on the creek channel changes and reshaping. 11. A permit shall be obtained by the applicant form the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands, (authority: Section 404, Clean WAter Act, and ORS 541.605 to 541.695) A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Subdivision by the applicant. 12. The applicant shall obtain written approval from Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County to connect to the Bonita interceptor prior to issuance of Public Improvement Permit. 13 . Lot 1 shall not be permitted to access directly onto Bonita Road. 5 14. Seven sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvement shall be submitted to the Engineering division for approval. Two sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. 15. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering division has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE FINAL APPROVAL DATE. DATED this / y of November, 1988. `GS OFFICER APPROVED: ' BETH MASON 6 2S112BA-00200 2S, 12AB-00400 STEWART, DAVID A & SUSAN A POFTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 24001 NE BUTTEVILLE RD 121 SW SALMON ST AURORA OR 97002 PORTLAND OR 97204 2S112AB-00700 2S112AB-00800 ANDERSEN, H A ET AL FOUGHT, JOSEPH M ET AL BY FOUGHT CO INC BY FOUGHT CO INC PO BOX 23759 PO BOX 23759 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AB-01600 2S112AB-01700 cc2CY� L COLUMBIA SUNDAY SCHOOL TIGARD, CITY OF BY BONITA COMMUNITY CHURCH 13125 SW HALL P 0 BOX 324 PO BOX 23397 COLUMBIA CITY OR 97018 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY MILTON BROWN FACILITIES MGMT—ADMIN 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. 150 N FIRST AVE, RM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97229 HILLSBORO OR 97124 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP STARKWEATHER 11830 SW KERR, SUITE 325 c/o BROWN, MILTON LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND OR 97229 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0010 BRCTAN/MILDREN OFSI((i GROUP 5 / k2 /3fri - 0/Ve ( .26cC / P_ qc-no0 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 0iJNOJ Fa.x:1-503-226-0063 Jul 24 '95 12:51 P.01/01 1 l R 1147-A' K, E T i. N' G- 1705 S.W. TAYLOR ST. PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 July 24, 1995 (503) 226-3641 FAX (503) 226-0723 Mr. will D'Andrea City of Tigard Dear Mr. D'Andrea: This letter is in regard to the inquiry of currant staff levels of personnel for OWNCO MAR(.ETING. At any given time, the largest number of staff on the premise does not exceed 80 individuals. This quantity reflects staff on our main shift which runs approximately 7:30 am to 5: 00 pm. Please call if there are any other questions. Since =1y, g/t Fr- k - a,ns Opera ions Xanager Y-, r RECEIVED �' l Q 0019 - 7995 f OOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT •I • e 1 , 0 4); LIRMAIMI■ - Ur 1/ K r i., 7,, -\..__IL. 1111■1- 7, A.. _ 2,,_ zo LO 0: -V- ( 40 1 _ II 1 _ rn I O to II Q i 1 1 Zo sr c w N. o 1 0-fir .442—,., N . ... .M.. i zo , i . r © ip 9 A iwi Mr I�� OWNCO Marketing Date October 6, 1995 Drawn by: Checked by: WEM MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. Revisions: �e] r ARCHITECTURE - SPACE PLANNING 2. In Progress Sheet 1�G-A 1.1-3 �f: 2 2 11830 SW Kerr Parkway,Suite 325 General Revision Job Number: 95003 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP, P.C., 1994, ALL (503)244-0552 RIGHTS RESERVED © h"1.....000" --- MILDREN DESIGN GROUP,P.C. ARCHITECTURE • SPACE PLANNING 11830 SW Kerr Parkway,Suite 325 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 503/244-0552 Fax 244-0417 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: C. Schiewe and Associates Date: September 9, 1995 Attention: Don Erickson Project Name: OWNCO Project Number: 95003 Attached: calculations change order copy of letter details plans samples _X_ shop drawings specifications other Number of copies: Description: (5) sets Overhead Door Submittals stamped,"Approved as noted". X For your use For your review For approval As requested Remarks: Copy to: Signed: Gene Mildren Mailed _X_To be picked up _Delivered via —.— - - _..........—......—......__..........__ - . . RECI...-.1V ED .8,1:;:, ,„-.-I-FIN il:JR THL PIN' kAMPOAD __l. •st...I:1,3 • - 43W-0* # ,(1,•1;,. IN Er-0'/Th •325.-0* (IL 7 If - 11'-; , ‘.... 15'-o° • . ' 25•-0. # 0 0 . COMMUNITY l)E V EL& s 73) i . . . ...._____ _ __ ___ _ . . . . . . . . . __. -.. _ __ ___ I — ____ ___ .1 ...- 0) ..._____. .t. II _________ : ■ • L. 1 .1r 1 Ll So 1 _ s-• .63 • • • • • • 6.- 0 I .______ 19 e. es — -rk(5 (lie . (4)t 1 1 I CO 1) (..i I'I • . • a N pdsp._ 0 l')ed.)d- ), ge,-/ • ______ _ ( / j tAj 0 itt_ (tjt..._&' PROPOSED BUILDING .1 ,P1Ae- co . tsc WI L. a(ce 1 - 14,„,1/4. I\- -F'' o - -.) 0 /611195 . • a...-, • . . . . . 1 • s _ tO 1 • • • • • • 1..sE-.•".3.• '. 10 0 . .. , • •i .',..:('-' ' .. . , I-- "( • ias . .,., ... .,,,:•:, I . b . • — 1 .. - . :;.-..--.-r•I . . AIM , -11 -----11• , Emstzi ..z. - . .. .. . Fr.;._;.. 4 111111 -co _ .._ e le ID ..: - • rir--4'0. 0,, , 14.- a 0 1•••• 0 _________ .•ji.,',. V...:.•,`--- . lc 1 111 & " & •••• . ,i1.4 ,,,.,_ .. .......... ............ ..................... ............... ... ... . .. ....................... ..................................-.1• •••• ' ' . .. . a; 0) •-•. 6'-0 .., . IP. ....... 3 SP. • z -0 a W-0 I 4,---0 -0* •• 27'-0 • .8--, •-8- ..:.:.:.:.:....:.:.:-::::.::::.:-iiiii.:14%;..:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:-:::..:. .::.:.(1).so,.At. .0.-(?.-=.63'—trt•...... .••(7)•V:•At.a•-458 ..twAvv .. • (", -'-i- • A 10'-7 1/2* 51.-0* . 1 . .. ............ ............... ...... ... . . 0 ....... ........ .... ..... .......... . . *4,:f• .................. ............. . . . . ......... ........ .... ... ........ . .................... ..... '5%,., •••• ••••••••••••••••• •••• ••• • •••• , jz 0 •••...41/4 ..S -'■ . EC) •••• ••••...• •• • ••••• ••••••• . ..,. . . / ....40 ..... .... ... ......... . et • •• •• •••• ••••••••••••• . ••'• •'•'••••'•••• ... ............ ‘ . ......:::::::::.•:::::::::::.•::::::::::::::::::::::• —..-_-___________... • ''.:_ 1.2..-:.-1...a-6.-...-..---- -- — — -- —-- . MI • .::;.1 : . ..................................... MEM 5 SP. AT 9-0 a'—o eihil . * um 6 SP. AT 51.-0* ..= 54.-0* cm :II 400 0 1/4* . . S.W. MILTON .DR I 7::.---7,:., ..,,,, :. 4 Ilk CITY OF TIGARD OREGON June 20, 1996 Stuart and Tunno Insurance P.O. Box 20309 Portland, OR 97294 RE: Landscape Improvement Performance Bond No. 422585S To whom it may concern: In the matter of the Landscape Improvement Performance Bond #422585S between Mrs. Ruth Shreinin and Indemnity Company of California and the City of Tigard, Oregon; this is to serve as written acknowledgment that the City has no further interest in said Landscape Improvement Performance Bond, all work assured thereby having been satisfactorily completed and, therefore, declares that this assurance obligation is void. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, William D'Andrea Assistant Planner i:\curpin\will\sdr95-10.1t2 c: SDR 95-0010 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 05/21/96 TUE 12:57 FAX 5032369679 C. SCHIEWE & ASSOC 2001 C5 a C. SCHIEWE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS FAX COVER SHEET DATE SENT: Sig-(,l`1,(0 TO: ()U•Gl tJ tks COMPANY: FAX NO. CC: FAX NO. FAX NO. FAX NO. FROM: K DON ERICKSON CRAIG PIERSON CARLEEN SCHIEWE RE: Qwh.cV MA-4)'ttJ ;. COMMENTS: NUMBER OF PAGES SENT INCLUDING COVER SHEET: IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES PLEASE CALL(503) 234-6617 ORIGINAL MAILED: YES NO 1024 N.C. DAVIS ST. PORTLAND,OR. 97232 PH: (503) 234-6617 FAX: (503) 236-9679 05/21/96 TUE 12:57 FAX 50323AQ679 C. SCHIEWE & ASSOC 11002 s C. SCHIEWE & ASSOCIATES INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS May 14, 1996 Mr. Gene Mildren Mildren Design Group 11830 S.W. Kerr Parkway#325 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 RE: BUP 95-0285 Ownco Marketing 14150 S.W. Milton Court Tigard, OR Dear Gene: Due to weather conditions, we will be unable to complete the exterior painting and landscaping prior to the scheduled occupancy date of May 24, 1996 for the above referenced project. We request your assistance in determining what the City of Tigard may require from the owner to insure that this work will be completed when the weather permits. The value of the uncompleted work is as follows: Painting $1,000.00; Landscaping $28,000.00. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to call. Yours truly, Don Erickson Vice President cc: John Souther - Spieker Properties /024 N.E. DAVIS ST. PORTLAND,OR. 97232 PH: (503) 234-6617 FAX: (503) 236-9679 Landscape Improvement Performance Bond 4225855 Bond # Know all men by these presence, that we Mrs. Ruth Sheinin as principal, Indemnity Company of Cal;f orn z? corporation duly authorized to conduct a general surety business in the State of Oregon, as surety, are jointly and severally held bound unto the City of Tigard, Oregon, a municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called Obligee, in the sum of $30,800., lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which we, as principal, and as surety, jointly and severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by these present. The conditions of this bond and obligation is such, that the principals are installing landscape improvements on property (located at) (idenified by an improvement plan know as) 14150 SW Milton Court. Located in the City of Tigard, Oregon, in accordance with a landscape plan approved by the City of Tigard, Oregon. Now, Therefore, if the principal herein shall faithfully and truly observe and comply with all terms and conditions of the approved landscape plan and shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be applicable to said development and improvement, and shall promptly make payments to all person supplying labor or material of any of the work provided by said agreement, and shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or prosecuted against the Obligee, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In the event of suit or action by filed by the Obligee hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms of this bond, in addition to all other rights and remedies, the City, in the event it shall prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as for attorney's fee. In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this 20th day of may 1996. Mrs. Ruth Sheinin (Principal) '--W-t-zZ I / • ' BY: BY: (A true copy of the power of attorney Indemgit Com.an of California must be attached to the original of this bond) (Sure ) ji- .. (Attorney in Fact) Geri M. Burnett One Centerpointe, Suite 420 (Address) Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 POWER OF ATTORNEY OF `- .1DEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFO..4IA AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY N-e 2 7 8 4 3 4 P.O.BOX 19725,IRVINE,CA 92713•(714)263-3300 NOTICE: 1. All power and authority herein granted shall in any event terminate on the 31st day of March,1999. 2. This Power of Attorney is void if altered or if any portion is erased. 3. This Power of Attorney is void unless the seal is readable,the text is in brown ink,the signatures are in blue ink and this notice is in red irk. 4. This Power of Attorney should not be returned to the Attorney(s)-In-Fact,but should remain a permanent part of the obligee's records. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that except as expressly limited,INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY,do each severally,but not jointly,hereby make,constitute and appoint ***BLAINE D. WILLIAMSON, GERI M. BURNETT, BRENT OLSON, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY*** the true and lawful Attorney(s)-In-Fact,to make,execute,deliver and acknowledge,for and on behalf of said corporations as sureties,bonds,undertakings and contracts of suretyship in an amount not exceeding Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars($2,500,000)in any single undertaking;giving and granting unto said Attorney(s)-In-Fact full power and authority to do and to perform every act necessary,requisite or proper to be done in connection therewith as each of said corporations could do,but reserving to each of said corporations full power of substitution and revocation;and all of the acts of said Attomey(s)-In-Fact,pursuant to these presents,are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the respective Board of Directors of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY,effective as of September 24,1986: RESOLVED,that the Chairman of the Board,the President and any Vice President of the corporation be,and that each of them hereby is,authorized to execute Powers of Attorney,qualifying the attorney(s)named in the Powers of Attorney to execute,on behalf of the corporation,bonds,undertakings and contracts of suretyship;and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the corporation be,and each of them hereby is,authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney; RESOLVED,FURTHER,that the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile,and any such Power of Attorney or certificate beanng such facsimile signatures shall be valid and binding upon the corporation when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond,undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY have severally caused these presents to be signed by their respective Presidents and attested by their respective Secretaries this 14th day of June,1995. INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY By ©! ,' ° DAU.lL4iBy �� 1' _Y 1 D. a F.Vincenti,Jr. ONPANYO_ D to F.Vincenti,Jr. Qa,\PPUORA yC President oPPOH4�v President Qk,�0 of ti 5 ATTEST O 2 •••-• OCT 27 ' 0 OCT. °o i 1979 1967 P y 03 /,FO�C1\P,� �a 4(/FOa� �� B * By .. Y Walter Crowell Walter rowell Secretary Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On June 14,1995,before me,C.V.Brink,personally appeared Dante F.Vincenti,Jr.and Walter Crowell,personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person(s)whose names)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies),and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s),or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted,executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. C. V. BRINK / / , . .�5,_ COMM.It1036712 p Signature A /�L'L�. ¢ ' NOTAAY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA y 2 ^ ORANGE COUNTY i - 9 My Comm.Exp.Aug.21.1998 CERTIFICATE The undersigned,as Senior Vice President of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA,and Senior Vice President of DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY,does hereby certify that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked;and furthermore,that the provisions of the resolutions of the respective Boards of Directors of said corporations set forth in the Power of Attorney,are in f c as o/ftf the / ftdate/ofthis Certificate. This Certificate is executed in the City of Irvine,California,thisxL' ' day of/2 4- ` ,19917 _ IINDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY ON,P ANY 0_ 5\NSURa1 �O POg4rn � Op�PO.4rC�, 9 z? OCT.5 °�+ B MAR.27 BY L.C.Fiebiger 0 1967 v12) y L.C.Fiebiger 1979 \P '- Senior Vice President ti� (/F21, is Senior Vice President O 4/FOPO t * * ID-310 REV.(2/96)