Loading...
SDR1995-00001 SD R95 - 00001 CASTILE PROJECT - Durham Industrial Park CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0001 VARIANCE VAR 95-0001 MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT MIS 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT APPLICATION: The applicant requests site development review approval to allow construction of three industrial buildings which total 12,000 square feet in two phases. Zone: I-P (Industrial Park) . Location: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 400 ) . The site is located along the southerly side of SW Durham Road, east of Durham Elementary and west of the Unified Sewerage Agency Sewer Treatment Facility. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. Conditions: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Durham Road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permit. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall coordinate the proposed driveway location and construction with the new roadway design with Washington County Road Department. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 4. The applicant shall re-design the site to provide one common driveway. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right- of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 6. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage of SW Durham Road, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 7. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. STAFF CONTACT: Development Services Technicians NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 1 8. Revised site/landscape plans and studies shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. A walkway shall be provided from SW Durham Road to the entrance of ■ each of the proposed buildings. The walkway shall be designed such that the portion of the walkway crossing the paved parking lot area does not exceed 36 feet. b. Provision of a minimum of one bicycle rack for each 15 required ✓ parking spaces. The bicycle racks shall be conveniently located at 111(--) the front of building entrances instead of at the two way drive C, aisle entrance to the site. c. The applicant shall provide a copy of the site plan which indicates L C-Oc the proposed trash and recycling enclosure locations for review and ,;� •z x;,,.�:� approval by the franchised hauler review. STAFF CONTACT: Lenny Hing, Pride Disposal (625-6177) . d. The applicant shall increase the percentage of the site area to be ' ` �- ` `'' landscaped by one percent or upgrade the plant materials proposed 14,, within the landscaped areas as allowed under Section r,,` /(, „�,/,f. 18.68.050 (6) (A) . e. The applicant shall provide a tree protection plan prepared by a -- f•�;. Certified Arborioculturist for all trees which are to be maintained on site. Upon review and approval the applicant shall provide ill written sign off from the arborist regarding completion of implementation of the protection measures specified in the report. 9. The site plan/landscape plan shall be modified to provide handicapped accessible parking at building entrances. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 10. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Backround: The site is presently developed with a single family residence and storage yard areas and accessory structures which are used by the property owners for the landscape maintenance business. The current property owner previously filed an application for Site Development Review and a Variance in 1989 for construction of a two story pole building for use in the owners landscape and nursery business. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located on the south side of SW Durham Road east of Durham Elementary and west of the Unified Sewerage Agency Sewage Treatment Facility. The property is zoned I-P (Planned Industrial) . The properties to the north SW Durham Road are zoned R-12 (Medium Density Residential) . NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 2 Properties to the west and south are zoned I-P. The property to the east developed as the Durham Elementary School is zoned R-12. The surrounding properties to the south are developed with the Unified Sewerage Agency Sewage Treatment Facility and the Durham Elementary School. Areas along the north side of SW Durham Road are developed or developing with residential uses. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has street frontage on SW Durham Road and an access easement which serves the Durham Elementary School site. The northerly portion of the site is developed with an older single family residence. The southerly portion of the site contains accessory structures and areas used for the owner's landscape maintenance business. 4. Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: Findings: 1. STREETS: The site plan proposes access from SW Durham Road, a State highway, and an Arterial street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan. The applicant should obtain an ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Durham Road. The highway currently consists of a two lane road with minimim paved shoulders and has been included in the MSTIP bond levy to finance the future widening. The City Council on April 9, 1990, determined that developments along SW Durham Road east of SW Hall Boulevard would not be required to construct half-street improvements, with the exception of interim improvements, with safety the principal consideration. Sufficient right-of-way has been dedicated to the State along the Tax Lot 400 frontage. In reference to the proposed access, it is recommended that the driveway incorporate a radius design per City Standards to facilitate future truck traffic. In addition, the site design should provide for joint access with Tax Lot 500 in order to minimize driveways connecting to the State highway. In order to minimize driveway connections to this arterial, the site plan should be redesigned for one joint use driveway. In addition, the driveway construction should be coordinated with the new street design for SW Durham Road that is being administered by the Washington County Road Section Team. The location of the proposed driveway is the same as the existing driveway. It appears that exiting traffic may not have sufficient sight distance at this location, due to the short vertical curves of the existing SW Durham Road construction. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located intermittently along both sides of SW Durham Road and the applicant should place the facilities located along the site highway frontage underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The applicant constructed a private sewer lateral that extends from the site across the contiguous Durham School property to the existing sewer main that is located in an easement at the rear of the school. This main line connects directly to the nearby USA sewer plant. The existing eight inch public sanitary sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 3 3. STORM SEWER: The site slopes in a southeasterly direction to the adjoining roadway that provides access to Durham School from SW 85th Avenue (the extension of SW Hall Boulevard) . The applicant proposes to construct a water quality facility at the rear of the development, parallel to the roadway. The roadway has an underground storm drain system of unknown origin. The applicant should be required to investigate the capacity of this downstream system and verify that the additional runoff will not unduly affect any downstream properties. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The applicant's proposed on-site facility should comply with these regulations and should be maintained by the property owner. 5. Agency Comments: The United States Postal Service reviewed this proposal and recommended the placement of a 2-Type II NDCBU's as indicated on the attached map. Washington County requested that right-of-way be dedicated to 45 feet from the centerline of SW Durham Road along both parcels and recommends a single shared driveway access to both parcels 400 and 500 should be considered when lot 500 develops (probably at the west end) . Through a shared driveway at this location there would be no conflicting turning movements opposite the SW 81st Court cul-de-sac. The Unified Sewerage Agency reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: 1. A water quality facility is needed. The drainage swale will probably not meet removal specifications. 2. Tenants will be required to fill out an industrial waste questionaire. 3. Erosion control plans and permit will be required. The Police Department reviewed this application and recommended that traffic exiting the property be required to only turn right onto SW Durham Road (east bound) as a condition of approval from a CPETD consideration. This is recommended from the perspective of traffic volume on SW Durham Road and the potential for vehicular accidents occuring as traffic exiting the property into the west bound traffic flow is struck by east bound traffic during peak periods. The Water Department reviewed this application and stated that with the development of both Tax lots 400 and 500 and the proposed installation of two fire hydrants an eight inch water main will be needed to be extended to the first hydrant. The second fire hydrant can be serviced with a six inch water main. Phase 1 of the project will require the installation of a fire hydrant. The existing hydrants located in the Durham School parking lot area cannot be used to calculate distances and fire protection because of fencing. Also the water meter size may need to be increased (or additional meters purchased to accomodate the expansion. Backflow protection is required on all meters. The Building Division stated that handicapped accessible parking shall be located at the shortest practical distance to the building entries. The parking lot as shown does not comply. This will be addressed again NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 4 through the building permit plan check review as required by OSSC Section 31041d. The Field Operations Division and Portland General Electric reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to further develop a property which currently has a residence and areas developed with accessory structures asscociated with the owner's landscape maintenance business. Industrial uses within an indutrial park setting is the principal permitted use within the Planned Industrial Zone as provided in Section 18.68 (Planned Industrial) and as further defined in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) . Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.68 (Planned Industrial) states that there is no minimum lot area requirement. The site is approximately 1.15 acres. The minimum lot width shall be an average of 50 feet for parcels in the I- P zoning district. The site is an existing parcel with an average width of approximately 123 feet which exceeds the standard. Setback and Height: Section 18.64.050 states that there is no front yard setback. The side and rear yard setback shall be 50 feet where a I-P zone abuts a residential zoning district. The applicant has requested a variance to this setback along the easterly property line to reduce the setback from fifty feet to two feet six inches. The buildings as proposed comply with the special setback requirement which is 50 feet from the centerline of SW Durham Road. The maximum allowed building height is 45 feet. The proposed buildings would not exceed a maximum height of approximately 18 feet which complies with the height requirement. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100 requires that the applicant submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a minimum of 25% of the site. The I-P zone allows a maximum of 75% of the site to be covered with buildings and impervious surfaces. The applicant has submitted a plan indicating the type and location of landscaping to be provided. This plan proposes 76% lot coverage with 24% of the site to be developed with landscaping. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide additional landscaped area or upgrade site landscaping as allowed under Section 18.68.050 (6) (A) . Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large) . The site has approximately 123 feet of frontage along SW Durham Road. The landscape plan indicates that a total of six existing trees would remain to serve this purpose. Based on their size at maturity these trees would be expected to satisfy this requirement. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110 (A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The preliminary site plan provides NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 5 planting details concerning the type and location of five parking lot trees which are proposed to provide shade for the proposed 33 parking spaces. The proposed trees exceed the minimum ratio of one tree for each seven parking spaces. Landscape islands require a minimum of three feet of width. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided landscape islands which vary between five and 65 feet in width due to the wider areas to be maintained around the existing home. The landscape plan provides sufficient width and planter orientation such that the proposed plantings can be protected from damage by vehicles using the adjoining parking spaces due to the extensive use of lawn for landscaping. Replacement of portions of the lawn area with low maintenance xerioscape, bark dust would be suggested. Planting a mixture of low lying shrubs and a variety of ground cover landscape materials would also be suggested to provide variation to the landscape planting plan. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between different types of land uses. The buffer matrix does not require a buffer where an industrial use abuts a school use. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 35 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 35 foot distance points with a straight line for the driveway on SW Durham Road. The plan as proposed complies with this requirement. The Planning Division will review the revised site and landscape plans through the building permit plan check review process to confirm that all structures and landscape improvements comply with this standard. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106 requires a minimum of one parking space for each employee. The floor plans of the proposed structures state that ten industrial suites are to be provided which would each have 1,200 square feet. The site plan also provided three parking spaces to serve the existing home of 1, 911 square feet which would be converted to a site office. The numbers of employees working full time at each suite will vary but given the limited size of these suites the 33 total proposed parking spaces are expected to be sufficient. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) : Revised regulations became effective on January 26, 1992. The act requires a minimum of two disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides two disabled person parking spaces which complies with the total number of spaces required given the number of required parking spaces. The Building Department states that the location of the spaces as provided must be more accessibly located towards the main entrances of the proposed buildings. This will require site plan revisions through the building permit plan check review process. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 6 Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106 requires one bicycle parking rack for each 15 required parking spaces in any commercial development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian pathways. The revised site plan shall provide bicycle parking at a ratio of one rack for each 15 parking spaces. The site plan presently provides an area for bicycle racks at the entrance to the site. It is recommended that the current centrally located bicycle rack location be revised to provide racks at building entrances. If possible these racks should also be under cover for ease of use. Access: Section 18.108 .080 states that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet of paved width. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one access driveway onto SW Durham Road to serve both phases which are proposed to be developed. The access provided is 30 feet in paved width thereby satisfying this requirement. The Engineering Department has recommended that the driveway apron be further widened to accomodate future truck traffic to the site. The Engineering Department and the Washington County Road Section Team has recommended revisions to the site plan to allow for future shared access of a single driveway should Tax Lot 500 develop. The applicant should consider revising the site plan to provide a circular access pattern to the shared driveway. This could be accomplished by eliminating or redesigning parking and landscaping south of the area currently shown for bicycle parking. This would allow a circular access pattern through tax lots 400 and 500 at buildout of the future phases on Tax Lot 500. All necessary access permits shall be obtained from the Oregon Department of Transportation. Walkways: Section 18.108.050 (A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of all new structures to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in which pedestrians must cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum curbed vertical separation or a minimum three foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet when appropriate pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obtructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The current site plan does provide a walway or walkway system to access SW Durham Road. A walkway shall be provided from SW Durham Road to the entrance of each of the proposed buildings. The walkway shall be designed such that the portion of the walkway crossing the paved parking lot area does not exceed 36 feet. Signs: Section 18.114 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P zone. All signage shall be reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18 .116 requires that new construction incorporate functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The minimumn standard for the type of development which has been proposed is six feet of storage area for each 1, 000 square feet of floor area. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 7 The current trash and recycling enclosures as proposed comply with the minimum standards for size. It is also recommended that the applicant contact Mr. Lenny Hing at 625-6177, with Pride Disposal, in order to review the design and location of the proposed enclosure locations to review daily site servicing issues. Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a variance. The applicant has requested a variance to the 50 structural setback requirement for Planned Industrial zoned property which adjoins a residentially zoned property. Approval of a variance request is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The variance is not in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan or requirements of the Development Code. The variance is necessary due to the location of the existing residence which is being preserved and incorporated into the site for use as an office. The applicant is also constrained from constructing site improvements at alternate locations due to the existing trees which are located towards SW Durham Road. To the extent possible the applicant has proposed to preserve and incorporate existing trees into the site. The variance allows economic use of the land given the deep, narrow nature of the property dimensions. 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The variance addresses site specific considerations having to do with the deep, narrow nature of the property. Although the site adjoins a residential zoned property the site is developed with the Durham Elementary School which is along the easterly property line of the site and "backs" into the subject property in terms of building orientation. School officials have reviewed this plan and have not raised any objections or concern with the building orientation as proposed. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; Given the need to provide a two way drive aisle access to the site and to preserve the existing residence as an office. A variance to the majority of the fifty foot setback allows the proposed site improvements to also "back" into the school site and allow site activities to orient away from the adjoining Durham Elementary School. Without this variance it is expected that uses such as the primary daily business activities such as access aisles, parking lots, service and manufacturing areas would orient directly towards the school site. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; and The variance would not significantly affect traffic, drainage, land forms or parks due to the fact that the variance relates to the structural location of buildings within the site rather than a variance to a driveway location or street design standard. The site has an overall topography of less than three percent slope. Through any type of urban development of this property the applicant will be required to NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 8 demonstrate that the redirected storm drainage will not impact downstream properties. This site is not designated for park or open space recreational use. 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that the site is constrained from strict compliance given the limited parcel dimensions and the location of the existing home. A variance to the setback requirements would allow site activities to be oriented away from the adjoining Durham Elementary School. The variance is expected to allow efficient development of the adjoining parcel to the west in the future shown in the applicant's "Master Plan" for adjoining Tax Lot 500. Tree Removal: Section 18 .150. 020 (E) requires a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground level. The applicant has proposed to remove eight trees in excess of six inches in height as measured four feet above the existing grade elevations. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Section 18.150. 030 (A) : 1. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; If preserved in place certain trees would interfere with the construction of necessary site improvements such as driveways, service areas and the industrial buildings to be developed. Locating the proposed development on alternate portions of the site is difficult due to site constraints such as the existing home which to be preserved and the narrow deep nature of the property. 2. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; If preserved in place certain trees would interfere with traffic safety given the location of existing site improvements. The applicant has attempted to avoid existing trees elsewhere on this site where possible. 3. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; The applicant has proposed to modify on-site drainage to direct the drainage to a common water quality and quantity treatment facility. The applicant has also been required to demonstrate that drainage off-site will not adversely impact downstream properties. 4. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desireable balance between shade and open space; Due to the limited number of trees which are to be removed it is not expected that the remaining trees will be impacted. The site plan has been required to be modified to comply with the landscape percentage requirements or to upgrade plant materials within the areas which are provided. 5. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and The applicant has attempted to preserve and incorporate several of the existing trees into the site through the site design. The applicant has proposed to preserve several more visible trees towards SW Durham Road. 6. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. The applicant has proposed new vegetation to serve the urban type development which has been proposed for the site. The applicant has attempted to preserve and NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 9 incorporate several of the existing trees into the site through the site design. Based on these findings removal of the eight trees as proposed complies with applicable Development Code criteria. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits the applicant is required to provide a tree protection plan by a Certified Arborioculturist for all trees which are to be maintained on site and which may be impacted by the proposed construction. Phased Development: Section 18.120.050 (A) and (B) allows development to occur in phases of up to three years where specific crtieria has been met. The approval of phased development is based on the following criteria: 1. The public facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase; The applicant has proposed to construct all necessary public improvements for both phases upon development of the first phase. 2. The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of temporary public facilities: a. A temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard; The applicant proposes to construct all necessary permanent site utilities to serve both phases during construction of the initial phase. 3. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required by the approved development proposal; and The applicant proposes to construct all necessary permanent site utilities to serve both phases during construction of the initial phase. 4. The Director's decision may be appealed as provided by Subsection 18.32.310.A. No notice need be given of the director's decision for phasing. Provisions for appeal of this decision are discussed elsewhere within this report. Based on these findings approval of a two phased development of this site for a period of up to three years is recommended. Transportation Planning Rule: The portion of the Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8, 1994, that applies to this application is OAR 660-12-045 (4) and (5) . This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following measures: a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and, c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street or, if not facing, be within a specified distance of the transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 10 pedestrian amenities can work together to display the main entrance and direct pedestrians to that entrance. This portion of SW Durham Road is a transit served street. The applicant has proposed an industrial type development which is not specifically required to cluster new development towards the transit served street. Due to the narrow deep nature of the property dimensions it would be difficult to shift the proposed buildings towards SW Durham Road and accomodate the proposed two way access onto the site given the location of the existing home and mature trees which are to be maintained in place as the manager's office and the trees as site amenities. Through the proposed conditions of approval, the applicant has been required to provide a separated walkway from SW Durham Road to the main entrance of the buildings. SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON March 15, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290 (A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. March 15, 1995. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171) , City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223 e::77/4e4,4 3/2/95 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Assistant Planner LI- 0,J1(4)41L/ 3/2/95 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers.o ' DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 11 . _ _ _ r 0., . 1_,___,_________.____.. \ — _ _ 1 tS.W. DUR-AM ROAD , .V- - - - - - - - - - - -• �C s- '.F.A\:\W\ .Mal \ ` {7LTi\ / i 1..,./..„ , .. ,.., , z„ ,,,ii z,...,„ __ 1 _ . , ss i i . = ' -Yfe iota\\\s,.':,,‘ .''� il i r�; I � E ~ ( : ,/ -N •\':,‘ ,.,„'s ._ ,i 1,k t( f ` i= ;��\ . ------------ a Ili C 1 EN !, ' 1 1 i ; f , E eng n.Aw E) 1PI arts new�+oPOe®) ;��! — (:: z T 5, ; S ' z :- .— 4 MOB■I ! '° — — II! I il MI Mt CLI i fI -f,t 4 I -MI 3 1 I ' 4 4 gl - I t • IIllhliIIIHIIIIIIV I _ I E ' IIIIII �". i:lirr ° I O NNN\\N\\\\. ,: 011/1111111111111.- ' - f . 1."1" ' S • PLOT PLAN CASE NO. SDR 95-0001 EXHIBIT MAP VAR 95-0001 MIS 95-0003 (- allifill111-■krn Dr I 1 1 liar M • cm -1 . I •A 1 EM rop14 Fa 4 ell rifir --rffirium tioluira:14: ,, smacsuarrx, nu E..2 r. ,, .0 ow_ R 12 woad BB ri. -. in analimmiy, . 1 , X P..... iirniT'ciruf.:71zoiric-0 Wirelaittaiii . limo glum oh I (po Tim ,. 11 IrlinignirriLuve3 unmans 1. E.Est it 01111111 %Viet 0,601133 =21- . a IMMIERVA ; " ull °kW 'WHIG go la el 1 " .77.11110tEtnaMiErill ec:-. L.L.1 • '' iZ 1:6-9 Zsignaz ? 41 ft ''' NM E ao Ite,tb... hiL_■ a inimm, .1. ra.z.,iital ....14-0=0. • ;A ark 'aim 1iiiiirg 11.111ERV LPPi/‘4 pIp i n, i m ylo1rw 11 i W I e fi_lifi.a. nr w i 1 ...w4:i9uM1a11n11n 1 i A n& L. (0 5 . 1 Z TIGARD • SITE HIGH i o SCHOOL Z USA - TKATmENT . II lb, jitpri • • Ill < ) PLANT Oplipiht+A -1 Cl. ■ IIPI ' 0 1 .) • - ,X1101117.11111 IIII-. 111. Sir ITIM air = illEillar .111111` , HD ; CC i . g id i . . . (..5 Z-12 i -• . • DURlo % ' t_ , I -- Aim Li 1 A 40-", Tin me NB LL oP ■se NtAilfaltil II . ■ 4-* ... .,, "Mtiniko. 0 if Ati '' 4-tr7---1 era 111 . . . , -tt., ... eipj >-. 7------. ■ a Ir'■-e...1. al. sin*'.. , , „ote 4iir mit'i - ta slows ' who ve!rls. mr., k v ,i=, 4(N I- _ - • 0 VICINITY CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP 1 SDR 95-0001 VAR 95-0001 • MIS 95-0003 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 03/13/95 10:15 05037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 Lj001/001 Oregon March 13, 1995 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Region 1 Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Mark Roberts FILE CODE: Subject: Castile Project, (SDR) 95-0001/(VAR) 95-0001/(MIS) 95-0003 ODOT has reviewed the subject application and has comments regarding this development. Our comments are as follows: • No access will be permitted to SW Durham Road; alternate access via SW Shaffer Road is available. • If the applicant needs to connect to the state drainage system, on-site detention is required. • All work performed in the state right-of-way will require a permit. • Curb and sidewalks will need to be constructed as per ODOT standards. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If you have further questions, please call me at 731-8232. Yl ' Laurie Nicholson Development Review Planner Post-it`Fax Note 7671 Date 1paVes / - To . ( rem / 1 Co.JDeP Co. Phone# phone* Fax it 644 ga97 Fax# ale cc: Sam Hunaidi, District 2A Permit Specialist 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 734-1850(11-94) FAX(503)731-8259 REQUEST FOR COMMENT, CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Fire District DATE: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503) 639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: �We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) / y Name of Person `Commentin g. - _ � Phone Number. .. C V65- RECEIVED REQUEST FOR COMMENTL FEB 2 i 1995 o ro TO: US Postal Svc./Randy Hammock DATE: February 1. IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503)639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108,18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400)ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services,.public support facilities, professional and administrative services,financial,insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,we need your comments by February 20,1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. -If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: s /K a.;L,x t o e a.7 i rvts / As, 2 5 -'- , 4 4 6 fil4i1 ..41 a� —T� u. NZ)ca 14/0 (Please provide the following information) � ,t Name of Perso n Commenting: I Drw.N Phone Number: 4i __St - 88;:7 r QI EwBTMG \ 0 !-L I_�, i-TAX LOT!EO 395.00' - ��__ - i _ 1 RN. , �, , _ _ 11=llflllli 111111[lIIIIlIlllllifllllllllll% E • �a/ 41111111111111111111111111111 _ �„ �■ Air pjiiIIllHIIIllL'IimllIillF I 04 • • y - - i-rnLOADING AREA � %i ���■ --'I ti 0@ Qq 1�->z� 'p '^I ^ �` EXISTING STRUCTURE '1-YTE I 1 %S 9 ` TO REMAIN H.(PHAOE 3) - I _-la-!a.� Ia_ca� • War VJ 1` /f.v./Ai LO�y��T I • , Iii ° %%� 1//.r /� ///Ili/.� ///i9I//// U///// mp• ////HL/// /I/%r '�idi i Ira/ TAX LOT -, // / / /j/// /j , ! $ $ 1/ ., .402,P ...o.st %/i ///,//�I0 I 1 . i i I i � 1 DLL i - ;$ / / // :'/, i, POSSIBLE kW.[,p ASF I v I -.a-p.m,/ ✓�';// /,''.j - /j P"5E 5• �1%1TE 4:STRdK:JR£ I =I AI • / i I �C' STD 3E R£^'IOVED �.UL 0 // EX*MG STRUCTURES =.i- I e„,/ / � � TO BE REMOVED =i�/7 // • �w�% j��j:///�; —LI I •_ --- --- LOADRiG AREA Nog - ,1 H, I i I - . -'1--1-'1T �luTr ' i tl t t,G t I imiiiaiiunirnuumi RECEIVED REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FEB 2 7 iggt � \/ � w DEVEi CITY OF TIGARD OREGON (� "MUNIh TO: I l I � DATE: February 1, 1995 Was.I4 t (4.,q-, FROM: Tigard Planing Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503)639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32. 18.68. 18 96 18.100, 18.1 02, 1 8.106, 18.108, 18.1120, 18.134, 1E.150 azd LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400)ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services,public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial,insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,we need your comments by February x,1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the endosed letter. j Written comments provided below: r- Ii fr 1, Cu? 0..VAJ. dad Lt-j- • di T GiL Ge 1,5 a t,t;1 r-e cUtM wte A s Q_ 5; / :S —• • ?sS *; .l.� .�A � lS • 500 b ''E a COi2Jl Jr± SOO deue loPS r0 f - W. 0-1 . .i I�;�r�-r k(6104± a--h-ss& � ."°'AA s` (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: (o l 3 - t'f-(0 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Water Department DATE: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503) 639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) ■ The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial,insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by February 20,1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK 'FILE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: b.liztk fl-& iUNELDPta6t.)v oc TA*. Lois (400 Ago 5m) A■vO 7I z 5E' /NSTAW477vAl OF Two Raz UYOrt z3 A- A-Iiucr,► l,.tA rt_ MMn1 10-114-4- NEE,C Ta r3E ExretoO 7 1 a� F;Q.5T lb ORAAir . Tikg C 1 JE.bJI C-E 1.1 r 7t- h- (0-/Alga L,LA7�x_ M4/AI, -P1 - / Cr 7P /laa-T W ii - 71\60.11 71i-c" /015741-1.40-371,ti.J A- �eE 1/110/ 107 m,a{ - 0/37/•/cr mOQAT173 /Al TWE .7)141'411 %:'R/a/A/Cr &Yr C t4A/A/o r 23E 15E0 To CA LCu L.a7C 7)is-r4.,,/c.E, AA/0 �� P ems/ u-SC (Please provide the following information) 0 MC-70Z- 51 ZE ,may NEE° 75 1 /NCQE/PSl�Q (a 4DOruct v.P • Name of Person Commenting: Miler M/u-cvt- Phone Number: 13(i5 ME7'eces) Pu. stsE6\ - ACCe.r4IiOA-rE -f& p41Js/oJ • "ctzi-or./ 7£cno,✓ /5 eEbf 1R L7 $ A-rc.. MC REQUEST FOR COMMENTF CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Building/Dave Scott DATE: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503) 639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. �Writteenn comments provided below: \w l I) 1( ss -D°,1\.n \r \o 'i\�A1Nk _ Y\6`1 1 c' \ cu\ �� -c�e5, 111\c A &w (1% c ' .„\\\ N'opAc., N‘\5., (0-(Dc,c, (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: C,`k Phone Number: 3\\ RECEIVED PLANNING - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 199 FEB t/n r; CITY OF TIGARD GD TO: P.G.E./Brian Moore DATE: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503)639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) ■ The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services,public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,we need your comments by February 20,1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _);- We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting. Phone Number RECEIVED PLANNING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS r EB 0 R 7995 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Unified Sewerage Agency/SWM PrcI E: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503) 639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. \\ // Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1 o )c{ V q Lea ( l -Va c r l c 1 A[ _� �e Gq DKaikgP Sz- a LO64 6(11 liv l /J Al O'r 1/k7 .c �i �� kvi ou J ,(ZQ,_,, L C atl0+7 S 19 rna,�ls 5 ho of � ,i/1 o 0 5 s 1 A 9o5T J WA CkvQ57fo 12.-C) 5 /0 2)4 k)5 1)61. kvv-7,4 (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS , , ►y au %CITY OF TIGA � OREGON RD TO: Field Operations DATE: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503) 639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,we need your comments by February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting. Phone Number: MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mark Roberts February 10, 1994 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 95-0001 CASTILE PROJECT Description : The applicant proposes to construct two buildings for a total area of 12, 000 square foot as first phase of an industrial park project located on SW Durham Road. The site is located 900 feet east of SW Hall Boulevard and is known as Tax Lot 2S1 13B 400 with an area of 0 . 98 acres . The applicant has included an overall Master Plan that incorporates the adjoining Tax Lot 2S1 13B 500 with an additional area of 1 . 34 acres as Phase II of the project . Currently, the applicant operates a landscape commercial business from this site . Findings : 1 . STREETS : The site plan proposes access from SW Durham Road, a State highway, and an Arterial street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan . The applicant should obtain an ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Durham Road. The highway currently consists of a two lane road with minimim paved shoulders and has been included in the MSTIP bond levy to finance the future widening. The City Council on April 9, 1990, determined that developments along SW Durham Road east of SW Hall Boulevard would not be required to construct half- street improvements, with the exception of interim improvements, with safety the principal consideration . Sufficient right-of-way has been dedicated to the State along the Tax Lot 400 frontage . In reference to the proposed access, it is recommended that the driveway incorporate a radius design per City Standards to facilitate future truck traffic . In addition, the site design should provide for joint access with Tax Lot 500 in order to minimize driveways connecting to the State highway . In order to minimize driveway connections to this arterial, the site plan should be re-designed for one joint use driveway . In addition, the driveway construction should be coordinated with the new street design for SW Durham Road that is being administered by the Washington County Road Section team. The location of the proposed driveway is the same as the existing driveway . It appears that exiting traffic may not have sufficient sight distance at this location, due to the short vertical curves of the existing SW Durham Road construction . ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-01 CASTILE PROJECT PAGE 1 The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located intermittently along both sides of SW Durham Road and the applicant should place the facilities located along the site highway frontage underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 2 . SANITARY SEWER: The applicant constructed a private sewer lateral that extends from the site across the contiguous Durham School property to the existing sewer main that is located in an easement at the rear of the school . This main line connects directly to the nearby USA sewer plant . The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development . 3 . STORM SEWER: The site slopes in a southeasterly direction to the adjoining roadway that provides access to Durham School from SW 85th Avenue (the extension SW Hall Boulevard) . The applicant proposes to construct a water quality facility at the rear of the development, parallel to the roadway . The roadway has an underground storm drain system of unknown origin . The applicant should be required to investigate the capacity of this downstream system and verify that the additional runoff will not unduly affect any downstream properties . The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No . 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The applicant' s proposed on-site facility should comply with these regulations and should be maintained by the property owner. Recommendations : PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED : 1 . The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Durham Road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permit . STAFF CONTACT : John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 2 . The applicant shall coordinate the proposed driveway location and construction with the new roadway design with Washington County Road Department . STAFF CONTACT :Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639- 4171) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-01 CASTILE PROJECT PAGE 2 3 . The applicant shall re-design the site to provide one common driveway . A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways . The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds . The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639-4171) 4 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No . 91-47 . NOTE : This is a two part fee which is paid at different times . The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot . 5 . The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage of SW Durham Road, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT : Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639-4171) 6 . Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No . 94- 18 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use . IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS . Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. APPROVED : �4:7 ,4/ , Randall R. W. : ey, City Engineer N:\ENGINEER\SDR95—Q1.mja ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-01 CASTILE PROJECT PAGE 3 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS au_u� CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Police DATE: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317] (503) 6394171 RE: SITE DEVELOPIV L NT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services,.public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a aecision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,we need your comments by February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written co• ft e•is •rovide• -below: (Please provide the following information) / Name of Person Commenting: «f/ Phone Number: M E M O R A N D U M TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: Mark Roberts FROM: Kelley Jennings/Crime Prevention Specialist DATE: February 2, 1995 SUBJECT: SDR 95-0001 for Castile Project Mark- I have looked at the proposed SDR. It is the Police Departments recommendation that traffic exiting the property be required to only turn right onto SW Durham Road(East Bound) as condition of approval from CPTED consideration. This is recommeded from the perspective of traffic volumes on SW Durham Rd. and the potential of vehicular accidents occurring as traffic exiting the property into the west bound traffic flow being struck by east bound traffic. REQUEST FOR COMMEi �S ALIA CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Per Attached DATE: February 1, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) (503) 639-4171 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. A request for Site Development Review approval to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: . 10 y 95-- a cc)► NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICAT V�-' \ 9 ` O& tM J q15%-(94:3C, 1. CIT (0) copies _ CPO NO. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS to Building Official/Dave S. rks & Recreation Board :lice Pity Recorder Field Operations Engineering/Michael A. ermits Facilitator/Jerree G. - Long Range Planning/Carol 3. SPECIAL DISTPS2TS • Fire District (pj,ek-up box) 1,/ Tigard Water Department - 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 v/ - Tualatin Valley Water District Unified Sewerage Agency/SWM Program PO Box 745 155 N. First St. Beaverton, OR 97075 Hillsboro, OR 97124 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. _ Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave. 800 NE Oregon St. 116 Suite 540 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232-2109 Brent Curtis (CPA's) - Jim Tice (IGA'S) METRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM Mike Borreson (Engineer) Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Scott King (CPA's) 600 NE Grand - Tom Harry (Current Planning App's) Portland, OR 97232-2736 - Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) - DLCD (CPA's/ZOA's) _ City of Beaverton 1175 Court St. NE - Jim Hendryx - Principal Planner Salem. OR 97310-0590 PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 /Other' City of King City A./ City of Durham - City Manager City Manager '- 15300 SW 116th PO Box 23483-3483 King City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 - (!_il!') City of Lake Oswego City of Portland City Manager Planning Director 380 SW A 1120 SW 5th Lake Oswego, OR 97034 P tland, OR 97204 State Highway Division IL' Sam Hunaidi Laurie Nicholson PO Box 25412 9002 SE McLoughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 97225-0412 Milwaukie, OR 97222 City of Tualatin Po Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 S. SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone L'/Portland General Elec. - Engineering Office Brian Moore 8840 SW Burnham St. 14655 SW Old Scholls Fry. Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97007 N - NW Natural Gas Metro Area Communications Scott Palmer Jason Hewitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaks Technology Center Portland, OR 97209 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 TCI Cablevision of Oregon - Linda Peterson _ US West 3500 SW Bond St. Pete Nelson Portland, OR 97201 421 SW Oak St. gortland, OR 97204 - Columbia Cable (Craig Eyestone) V/ 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. - Tri-Met Transit Dev. Beaverton, OR 97005 Kim Knox 710 NE Holladay St. 6. STATE AGENCIES 3ortland, OR 97232 Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) US Postal Service Division of State Lands Randy Hammock, Growth Coordinator - Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park Cedar Mill Station -_ Fish & Wildlife Portland, OR 97229-9998 PUC Dept. of Environ. Quality - DOGAMI 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES _Other Corps. of Engineers 8. OTHER Southern Pacific Transportation Company - Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: �( That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (marked Exhibit"A")was mailed to each nameersons at the address shown on the attached list (marked Exhibit "B") on the vZ day of March, 1995, said NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING/D 4SION as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin boar o/ li ___ day of March, 1995 and deposited in the United States Mail on the day of March, 1995, postage prepaid. • 1 / epared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7 day of C',��'LU'U?, 19. • 1.,, -OFFICIAL SEAL. MANE M.JELDERKIS, '�►'�'.' NOTARY RI 61.1C-OREGON COMMISSION NO.008977 ,t N i;Ati2-' Y PUBLIC • ' OREGON/ j MY COMMISSION EXPIRES gcl=r-7.1995,j My Commission 9 sires. FILE INFO.: (5W-45---01444E.45-tzrAiis ! LE NOTICE OF DECISION FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR) CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0001 VARIANCE VAR 95-0001 MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT MIS 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT APPLICATION: The applicant requests site development review approval to allow construction of three industrial buildings which total 12,000 square feet in two phases. Zone: I-P (Industrial Park) . Location: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 400 ) . The site is located along the southerly side of SW Durham Road, east of Durham Elementary and west of the Unified Sewerage Agency Sewer Treatment Facility. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. Conditions: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Durham Road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permit. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall coordinate the proposed driveway location and construction with the new roadway design with Washington County Road Department. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 4. The applicant shall re-design the site to provide one common driveway. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right- of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 6. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage of SW Durham Road, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 7. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. STAFF CONTACT: Development Services Technicians NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 1 8. Revised site/landscape plans and studies shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. A walkway shall be provided from SW Durham Road to the entrance of ■ each of the proposed buildings. The walkway shall be designed such that the portion of the walkway crossing the paved parking lot area does not exceed 36 feet. b. Provision of a minimum of one bicycle rack for each 15 required ✓ parking spaces. The bicycle racks shall be conveniently located at 111(--) the front of building entrances instead of at the two way drive C, aisle entrance to the site. c. The applicant shall provide a copy of the site plan which indicates L C-Oc the proposed trash and recycling enclosure locations for review and ,;� •z x;,,.�:� approval by the franchised hauler review. STAFF CONTACT: Lenny Hing, Pride Disposal (625-6177) . d. The applicant shall increase the percentage of the site area to be ' ` �- ` `'' landscaped by one percent or upgrade the plant materials proposed 14,, within the landscaped areas as allowed under Section r,,` /(, „�,/,f. 18.68.050 (6) (A) . e. The applicant shall provide a tree protection plan prepared by a -- f•�;. Certified Arborioculturist for all trees which are to be maintained on site. Upon review and approval the applicant shall provide ill written sign off from the arborist regarding completion of implementation of the protection measures specified in the report. 9. The site plan/landscape plan shall be modified to provide handicapped accessible parking at building entrances. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 10. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Backround: The site is presently developed with a single family residence and storage yard areas and accessory structures which are used by the property owners for the landscape maintenance business. The current property owner previously filed an application for Site Development Review and a Variance in 1989 for construction of a two story pole building for use in the owners landscape and nursery business. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located on the south side of SW Durham Road east of Durham Elementary and west of the Unified Sewerage Agency Sewage Treatment Facility. The property is zoned I-P (Planned Industrial) . The properties to the north SW Durham Road are zoned R-12 (Medium Density Residential) . NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 2 Properties to the west and south are zoned I-P. The property to the east developed as the Durham Elementary School is zoned R-12. The surrounding properties to the south are developed with the Unified Sewerage Agency Sewage Treatment Facility and the Durham Elementary School. Areas along the north side of SW Durham Road are developed or developing with residential uses. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has street frontage on SW Durham Road and an access easement which serves the Durham Elementary School site. The northerly portion of the site is developed with an older single family residence. The southerly portion of the site contains accessory structures and areas used for the owner's landscape maintenance business. 4. Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: Findings: 1. STREETS: The site plan proposes access from SW Durham Road, a State highway, and an Arterial street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan. The applicant should obtain an ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Durham Road. The highway currently consists of a two lane road with minimim paved shoulders and has been included in the MSTIP bond levy to finance the future widening. The City Council on April 9, 1990, determined that developments along SW Durham Road east of SW Hall Boulevard would not be required to construct half-street improvements, with the exception of interim improvements, with safety the principal consideration. Sufficient right-of-way has been dedicated to the State along the Tax Lot 400 frontage. In reference to the proposed access, it is recommended that the driveway incorporate a radius design per City Standards to facilitate future truck traffic. In addition, the site design should provide for joint access with Tax Lot 500 in order to minimize driveways connecting to the State highway. In order to minimize driveway connections to this arterial, the site plan should be redesigned for one joint use driveway. In addition, the driveway construction should be coordinated with the new street design for SW Durham Road that is being administered by the Washington County Road Section Team. The location of the proposed driveway is the same as the existing driveway. It appears that exiting traffic may not have sufficient sight distance at this location, due to the short vertical curves of the existing SW Durham Road construction. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located intermittently along both sides of SW Durham Road and the applicant should place the facilities located along the site highway frontage underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The applicant constructed a private sewer lateral that extends from the site across the contiguous Durham School property to the existing sewer main that is located in an easement at the rear of the school. This main line connects directly to the nearby USA sewer plant. The existing eight inch public sanitary sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 3 3. STORM SEWER: The site slopes in a southeasterly direction to the adjoining roadway that provides access to Durham School from SW 85th Avenue (the extension of SW Hall Boulevard) . The applicant proposes to construct a water quality facility at the rear of the development, parallel to the roadway. The roadway has an underground storm drain system of unknown origin. The applicant should be required to investigate the capacity of this downstream system and verify that the additional runoff will not unduly affect any downstream properties. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The applicant's proposed on-site facility should comply with these regulations and should be maintained by the property owner. 5. Agency Comments: The United States Postal Service reviewed this proposal and recommended the placement of a 2-Type II NDCBU's as indicated on the attached map. Washington County requested that right-of-way be dedicated to 45 feet from the centerline of SW Durham Road along both parcels and recommends a single shared driveway access to both parcels 400 and 500 should be considered when lot 500 develops (probably at the west end) . Through a shared driveway at this location there would be no conflicting turning movements opposite the SW 81st Court cul-de-sac. The Unified Sewerage Agency reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: 1. A water quality facility is needed. The drainage swale will probably not meet removal specifications. 2. Tenants will be required to fill out an industrial waste questionaire. 3. Erosion control plans and permit will be required. The Police Department reviewed this application and recommended that traffic exiting the property be required to only turn right onto SW Durham Road (east bound) as a condition of approval from a CPETD consideration. This is recommended from the perspective of traffic volume on SW Durham Road and the potential for vehicular accidents occuring as traffic exiting the property into the west bound traffic flow is struck by east bound traffic during peak periods. The Water Department reviewed this application and stated that with the development of both Tax lots 400 and 500 and the proposed installation of two fire hydrants an eight inch water main will be needed to be extended to the first hydrant. The second fire hydrant can be serviced with a six inch water main. Phase 1 of the project will require the installation of a fire hydrant. The existing hydrants located in the Durham School parking lot area cannot be used to calculate distances and fire protection because of fencing. Also the water meter size may need to be increased (or additional meters purchased to accomodate the expansion. Backflow protection is required on all meters. The Building Division stated that handicapped accessible parking shall be located at the shortest practical distance to the building entries. The parking lot as shown does not comply. This will be addressed again NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 4 through the building permit plan check review as required by OSSC Section 31041d. The Field Operations Division and Portland General Electric reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to further develop a property which currently has a residence and areas developed with accessory structures asscociated with the owner's landscape maintenance business. Industrial uses within an indutrial park setting is the principal permitted use within the Planned Industrial Zone as provided in Section 18.68 (Planned Industrial) and as further defined in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) . Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.68 (Planned Industrial) states that there is no minimum lot area requirement. The site is approximately 1.15 acres. The minimum lot width shall be an average of 50 feet for parcels in the I- P zoning district. The site is an existing parcel with an average width of approximately 123 feet which exceeds the standard. Setback and Height: Section 18.64.050 states that there is no front yard setback. The side and rear yard setback shall be 50 feet where a I-P zone abuts a residential zoning district. The applicant has requested a variance to this setback along the easterly property line to reduce the setback from fifty feet to two feet six inches. The buildings as proposed comply with the special setback requirement which is 50 feet from the centerline of SW Durham Road. The maximum allowed building height is 45 feet. The proposed buildings would not exceed a maximum height of approximately 18 feet which complies with the height requirement. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100 requires that the applicant submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a minimum of 25% of the site. The I-P zone allows a maximum of 75% of the site to be covered with buildings and impervious surfaces. The applicant has submitted a plan indicating the type and location of landscaping to be provided. This plan proposes 76% lot coverage with 24% of the site to be developed with landscaping. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide additional landscaped area or upgrade site landscaping as allowed under Section 18.68.050 (6) (A) . Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large) . The site has approximately 123 feet of frontage along SW Durham Road. The landscape plan indicates that a total of six existing trees would remain to serve this purpose. Based on their size at maturity these trees would be expected to satisfy this requirement. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110 (A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The preliminary site plan provides NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 5 planting details concerning the type and location of five parking lot trees which are proposed to provide shade for the proposed 33 parking spaces. The proposed trees exceed the minimum ratio of one tree for each seven parking spaces. Landscape islands require a minimum of three feet of width. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided landscape islands which vary between five and 65 feet in width due to the wider areas to be maintained around the existing home. The landscape plan provides sufficient width and planter orientation such that the proposed plantings can be protected from damage by vehicles using the adjoining parking spaces due to the extensive use of lawn for landscaping. Replacement of portions of the lawn area with low maintenance xerioscape, bark dust would be suggested. Planting a mixture of low lying shrubs and a variety of ground cover landscape materials would also be suggested to provide variation to the landscape planting plan. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between different types of land uses. The buffer matrix does not require a buffer where an industrial use abuts a school use. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 35 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 35 foot distance points with a straight line for the driveway on SW Durham Road. The plan as proposed complies with this requirement. The Planning Division will review the revised site and landscape plans through the building permit plan check review process to confirm that all structures and landscape improvements comply with this standard. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106 requires a minimum of one parking space for each employee. The floor plans of the proposed structures state that ten industrial suites are to be provided which would each have 1,200 square feet. The site plan also provided three parking spaces to serve the existing home of 1, 911 square feet which would be converted to a site office. The numbers of employees working full time at each suite will vary but given the limited size of these suites the 33 total proposed parking spaces are expected to be sufficient. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) : Revised regulations became effective on January 26, 1992. The act requires a minimum of two disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides two disabled person parking spaces which complies with the total number of spaces required given the number of required parking spaces. The Building Department states that the location of the spaces as provided must be more accessibly located towards the main entrances of the proposed buildings. This will require site plan revisions through the building permit plan check review process. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 6 Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106 requires one bicycle parking rack for each 15 required parking spaces in any commercial development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian pathways. The revised site plan shall provide bicycle parking at a ratio of one rack for each 15 parking spaces. The site plan presently provides an area for bicycle racks at the entrance to the site. It is recommended that the current centrally located bicycle rack location be revised to provide racks at building entrances. If possible these racks should also be under cover for ease of use. Access: Section 18.108 .080 states that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet of paved width. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one access driveway onto SW Durham Road to serve both phases which are proposed to be developed. The access provided is 30 feet in paved width thereby satisfying this requirement. The Engineering Department has recommended that the driveway apron be further widened to accomodate future truck traffic to the site. The Engineering Department and the Washington County Road Section Team has recommended revisions to the site plan to allow for future shared access of a single driveway should Tax Lot 500 develop. The applicant should consider revising the site plan to provide a circular access pattern to the shared driveway. This could be accomplished by eliminating or redesigning parking and landscaping south of the area currently shown for bicycle parking. This would allow a circular access pattern through tax lots 400 and 500 at buildout of the future phases on Tax Lot 500. All necessary access permits shall be obtained from the Oregon Department of Transportation. Walkways: Section 18.108.050 (A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of all new structures to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in which pedestrians must cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum curbed vertical separation or a minimum three foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet when appropriate pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obtructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The current site plan does provide a walway or walkway system to access SW Durham Road. A walkway shall be provided from SW Durham Road to the entrance of each of the proposed buildings. The walkway shall be designed such that the portion of the walkway crossing the paved parking lot area does not exceed 36 feet. Signs: Section 18.114 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P zone. All signage shall be reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18 .116 requires that new construction incorporate functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The minimumn standard for the type of development which has been proposed is six feet of storage area for each 1, 000 square feet of floor area. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 7 The current trash and recycling enclosures as proposed comply with the minimum standards for size. It is also recommended that the applicant contact Mr. Lenny Hing at 625-6177, with Pride Disposal, in order to review the design and location of the proposed enclosure locations to review daily site servicing issues. Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a variance. The applicant has requested a variance to the 50 structural setback requirement for Planned Industrial zoned property which adjoins a residentially zoned property. Approval of a variance request is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The variance is not in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan or requirements of the Development Code. The variance is necessary due to the location of the existing residence which is being preserved and incorporated into the site for use as an office. The applicant is also constrained from constructing site improvements at alternate locations due to the existing trees which are located towards SW Durham Road. To the extent possible the applicant has proposed to preserve and incorporate existing trees into the site. The variance allows economic use of the land given the deep, narrow nature of the property dimensions. 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The variance addresses site specific considerations having to do with the deep, narrow nature of the property. Although the site adjoins a residential zoned property the site is developed with the Durham Elementary School which is along the easterly property line of the site and "backs" into the subject property in terms of building orientation. School officials have reviewed this plan and have not raised any objections or concern with the building orientation as proposed. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; Given the need to provide a two way drive aisle access to the site and to preserve the existing residence as an office. A variance to the majority of the fifty foot setback allows the proposed site improvements to also "back" into the school site and allow site activities to orient away from the adjoining Durham Elementary School. Without this variance it is expected that uses such as the primary daily business activities such as access aisles, parking lots, service and manufacturing areas would orient directly towards the school site. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; and The variance would not significantly affect traffic, drainage, land forms or parks due to the fact that the variance relates to the structural location of buildings within the site rather than a variance to a driveway location or street design standard. The site has an overall topography of less than three percent slope. Through any type of urban development of this property the applicant will be required to NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 8 demonstrate that the redirected storm drainage will not impact downstream properties. This site is not designated for park or open space recreational use. 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that the site is constrained from strict compliance given the limited parcel dimensions and the location of the existing home. A variance to the setback requirements would allow site activities to be oriented away from the adjoining Durham Elementary School. The variance is expected to allow efficient development of the adjoining parcel to the west in the future shown in the applicant's "Master Plan" for adjoining Tax Lot 500. Tree Removal: Section 18 .150. 020 (E) requires a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground level. The applicant has proposed to remove eight trees in excess of six inches in height as measured four feet above the existing grade elevations. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Section 18.150. 030 (A) : 1. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; If preserved in place certain trees would interfere with the construction of necessary site improvements such as driveways, service areas and the industrial buildings to be developed. Locating the proposed development on alternate portions of the site is difficult due to site constraints such as the existing home which to be preserved and the narrow deep nature of the property. 2. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; If preserved in place certain trees would interfere with traffic safety given the location of existing site improvements. The applicant has attempted to avoid existing trees elsewhere on this site where possible. 3. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; The applicant has proposed to modify on-site drainage to direct the drainage to a common water quality and quantity treatment facility. The applicant has also been required to demonstrate that drainage off-site will not adversely impact downstream properties. 4. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desireable balance between shade and open space; Due to the limited number of trees which are to be removed it is not expected that the remaining trees will be impacted. The site plan has been required to be modified to comply with the landscape percentage requirements or to upgrade plant materials within the areas which are provided. 5. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and The applicant has attempted to preserve and incorporate several of the existing trees into the site through the site design. The applicant has proposed to preserve several more visible trees towards SW Durham Road. 6. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. The applicant has proposed new vegetation to serve the urban type development which has been proposed for the site. The applicant has attempted to preserve and NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 9 incorporate several of the existing trees into the site through the site design. Based on these findings removal of the eight trees as proposed complies with applicable Development Code criteria. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits the applicant is required to provide a tree protection plan by a Certified Arborioculturist for all trees which are to be maintained on site and which may be impacted by the proposed construction. Phased Development: Section 18.120.050 (A) and (B) allows development to occur in phases of up to three years where specific crtieria has been met. The approval of phased development is based on the following criteria: 1. The public facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase; The applicant has proposed to construct all necessary public improvements for both phases upon development of the first phase. 2. The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of temporary public facilities: a. A temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard; The applicant proposes to construct all necessary permanent site utilities to serve both phases during construction of the initial phase. 3. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required by the approved development proposal; and The applicant proposes to construct all necessary permanent site utilities to serve both phases during construction of the initial phase. 4. The Director's decision may be appealed as provided by Subsection 18.32.310.A. No notice need be given of the director's decision for phasing. Provisions for appeal of this decision are discussed elsewhere within this report. Based on these findings approval of a two phased development of this site for a period of up to three years is recommended. Transportation Planning Rule: The portion of the Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8, 1994, that applies to this application is OAR 660-12-045 (4) and (5) . This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following measures: a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and, c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street or, if not facing, be within a specified distance of the transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 10 pedestrian amenities can work together to display the main entrance and direct pedestrians to that entrance. This portion of SW Durham Road is a transit served street. The applicant has proposed an industrial type development which is not specifically required to cluster new development towards the transit served street. Due to the narrow deep nature of the property dimensions it would be difficult to shift the proposed buildings towards SW Durham Road and accomodate the proposed two way access onto the site given the location of the existing home and mature trees which are to be maintained in place as the manager's office and the trees as site amenities. Through the proposed conditions of approval, the applicant has been required to provide a separated walkway from SW Durham Road to the main entrance of the buildings. SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON March 15, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290 (A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. March 15, 1995. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171) , City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223 e::77/4e4,4 3/2/95 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Assistant Planner LI- 0,J1(4)41L/ 3/2/95 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers.o ' DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 11 . _ _ _ r 0., . 1_,___,_________.____.. \ — _ _ 1 tS.W. DUR-AM ROAD , .V- - - - - - - - - - - -• �C s- '.F.A\:\W\ .Mal \ ` {7LTi\ / i 1..,./..„ , .. ,.., , z„ ,,,ii z,...,„ __ 1 _ . , ss i i . = ' -Yfe iota\\\s,.':,,‘ .''� il i r�; I � E ~ ( : ,/ -N •\':,‘ ,.,„'s ._ ,i 1,k t( f ` i= ;��\ . ------------ a Ili C 1 EN !, ' 1 1 i ; f , E eng n.Aw E) 1PI arts new�+oPOe®) ;��! — (:: z T 5, ; S ' z :- .— 4 MOB■I ! '° — — II! I il MI Mt CLI i fI -f,t 4 I -MI 3 1 I ' 4 4 gl - I t • IIllhliIIIHIIIIIIV I _ I E ' IIIIII �". i:lirr ° I O NNN\\N\\\\. ,: 011/1111111111111.- ' - f . 1."1" ' S • PLOT PLAN CASE NO. SDR 95-0001 EXHIBIT MAP VAR 95-0001 MIS 95-0003 (- allifill111-■krn Dr I 1 1 liar M • cm -1 . I •A 1 EM rop14 Fa 4 ell rifir --rffirium tioluira:14: ,, smacsuarrx, nu E..2 r. ,, .0 ow_ R 12 woad BB ri. -. in analimmiy, . 1 , X P..... iirniT'ciruf.:71zoiric-0 Wirelaittaiii . limo glum oh I (po Tim ,. 11 IrlinignirriLuve3 unmans 1. E.Est it 01111111 %Viet 0,601133 =21- . a IMMIERVA ; " ull °kW 'WHIG go la el 1 " .77.11110tEtnaMiErill ec:-. L.L.1 • '' iZ 1:6-9 Zsignaz ? 41 ft ''' NM E ao Ite,tb... hiL_■ a inimm, .1. ra.z.,iital ....14-0=0. • ;A ark 'aim 1iiiiirg 11.111ERV LPPi/‘4 pIp i n, i m ylo1rw 11 i W I e fi_lifi.a. nr w i 1 ...w4:i9uM1a11n11n 1 i A n& L. (0 5 . 1 Z TIGARD • SITE HIGH i o SCHOOL Z USA - TKATmENT . II lb, jitpri • • Ill < ) PLANT Oplipiht+A -1 Cl. ■ IIPI ' 0 1 .) • - ,X1101117.11111 IIII-. 111. Sir ITIM air = illEillar .111111` , HD ; CC i . g id i . . . (..5 Z-12 i -• . • DURlo % ' t_ , I -- Aim Li 1 A 40-", Tin me NB LL oP ■se NtAilfaltil II . ■ 4-* ... .,, "Mtiniko. 0 if Ati '' 4-tr7---1 era 111 . . . , -tt., ... eipj >-. 7------. ■ a Ir'■-e...1. al. sin*'.. , , „ote 4iir mit'i - ta slows ' who ve!rls. mr., k v ,i=, 4(N I- _ - • 0 VICINITY CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP 1 SDR 95-0001 VAR 95-0001 • MIS 95-0003 Bch bIt r/A" • SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001/MIS 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT/JAMES CASTILE (page 1 o1) 2511380-00400 25113B0-003t- CASTILE, JAMES W & AUDREY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 9565 SW INEZ 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97062 TIGARD OR 97123 2S113B0-00500 2S113B0-00401 CASTILE, JAMES & AUDREY OREGON, STATE OF 8100 SW DURHAM RD DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION TIGARD OR 97224 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG SALEM OR 97310 2S112CC-01800 2S112CC-01801 BENJAMIN, JUDITH A BOWEN, RICHARD L AND TERESA 15965 SW 81ST CT PO BOX 94 TIGARD OR 97224 TUALATIN OR 97062 2S112CC-01804 2S112CC-01900 BARRETT, GORDON W & MELISSA J COTTER, EDWARD E AND 15987 SW 81ST CT VIOLA C TIGARD OR 97223 8065 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97223 2S112CC-02000 2S112CC-05800 GOBLE, MARION MARLIN ROGERS, CYNTHIA R 8025 SW DURHAM RD 15932 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CC-05900 2S112CC-06100 NEWBERRY, MICHAEL H KENNEDY, REESE C & 15954 SW 81ST CT RUTH U TRUSTEES TIGARD OR 97224 15943 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CC-06200 2S113B0-00600 JENSEN-JUNGWIRTH, CAROL BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC 15921 SW 81ST CT 2600 CONTINENTAL PLAZA BLDG PORTLAND OR 97219 777 MAIN ST FORT WORTH TX 76102 JAMES CASTILE 7800 SW PETERS DURHAM OR 97224 ■ l1li1/ 1l 1\ 1rnCVi 11 :�1�113/1111 Ewa.MN,'FIE 1 a, �i F'�- ;.111 f44 _ t, q *A p si :iii Q.i h� /r �� —= .. 111 r���/! rf'�.o ,, Arg 12 ;0T4ag r/`trui, ■■■'riaTi 1�. - num. lum 9. .. , (po) wym �tti*i�l�Ei■�wC• mss -. ..:. fill imml alIP ...11 . r I a 4/I 1 iiiia re4; .. .I) Mir „IS -:„ , 0_, :F a∎, L■►��� J■ � '!":: _ '`x111211 gam'/ 1, cc 44 ;,. �r !!mmiiI or �� I1U91 .r!HI/I/1n �,imi E: Vit li 1■�1 /11111 1 i 117121e/Will loll I idillill...intr./11V. p cu J\ri�± 11 I-•. 1 ... isimi,- gm... .c. TIGARD SITE » `_ , SCHOOL or a p ' i � ' ; i_p rib. . , 7A10 : . =-- C:1 x'. [ , t Mir p g . ' Z-12 .� -*at ,, ... . :: ., ..,...„,i , .,_ �,iE U.&It-.27v. i.n. .8 . i,<Q>,,414niks .., 4 0 . 1 411 , ;..1 ". ..p. 1 1 I_____% ,..,,, ..,1:, 1 Alb 7-el ■ 1. -s...,� �r.;- U VICINITY i CASE NO. �/� //�� EXHIBIT H N SDR 95-0001 VAR 95-0001 MIS 95-0003 rM fir. g I / ___. r 00 - -� T I L I� i o.wr✓w� .T.ii .•on T im i .,I I • . \a..I i� 'Lr \ JiL± 55!J P�f �3_s I� / O I /� . • •im / _ ` Welli am=MI WM 1110 •- MOM MEM .5. 1.......likr\*.I...,/r IPIIllhiiiiVIffl1IIIllIIll _ 111ll� 1111 : IO!I___ -a- IDIIIIIIIIIItiIllhIUIOiELlluIllhIIIllllllllIiluhUlI roa.. �. '�'} aril Z I It.v ‘, . A ' .. 4..r,.b f>... � 91 VOW•OO•1 I Me .0.44 rir — ra Cm ti ' `AD U 1 to to to ..oa wa �..m I o 0 o Z I ..m..a... ...1 , I "„ I• 0 0 0 it ....�;% aJb P , �; 0 0 C)9'«ate. i I H 42100111.14—' / .....� � I > clam.11-(7. ,.e..a I 1 ' L .o..�...- y..a,,.•.a,.- I lj I ._ — __- 1 4 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT . :!�!, COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 NOtICeTT 8120 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 RECEIVED Legal Notice Advertising MAR 0 7 1995 ¶ity of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •'ITY OF TIGARD Srigard ,Oregon 9 7 2 2 3 • ❑ Duplicate Affirinvit ,� .11r- • • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-0001/ VARIANCE(VAR)95-0001/ MISCELLANEOUS (MIS)95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT The Director has approved, subject to conditions,a Site Development Review request to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square STATE OF OREGON, ) feet. The applicant has also requested a variance to the 50 foot setback COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS. requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community I, __ Kathy Snyder _- Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150,and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 S.W. Director, or his principal clerk, of thtigard—Tua lat in Tim( Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C,tax lot 00400). ZONE: I-P(Industrial a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 Park)—The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services,public and 193.020; published at Tigard in the support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, aforesaid county and state. that the insurance,real estate,and business support services, manufacturing of Site Review 95-0001/Castile Project finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the distribution among other uses. entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and - : ,' 't... n1 •-�:" ate:�1-��I - , i --�u1 i a _. • .11 .lf: lR consecutive in the following issues: ;O.Z.-in,:::' `# •'•" - _ R-12 nlq' 1=-7.1.7� .*•ar+r6I-.• March 2 , 19 9 Gc, .�u:.-,11.1., .1;sigma t� 1--.es.5 ..nin,n■ EiN ,�,=:J• ICJ ;. n7��' -..♦IMF}:. W le „42._.141&LA...., I► it t 1 t1-, ©rar Ili :qu•I-.,,1I j�£1c uuuugl . sr..I r I�`I�I�a.dHN111 '�� •111111 r•.r••7- 7 -- •I gammas '~�IF"11.weir 6i ■s1./ z z Subscribed and sworn to be re me this 2nd day of March, we s „7/)" 41 ./.4i\ Z /n4.41 �� hut, r ,�, r d Notary lie for Oregon I PLANT `� `� J My Commission Expires: 1-P / / 0 AFFIDAVIT -- - r CC DURI-abil III II 0 w •r T•i"'" L.L. at, •c�4�#utr,,,, in /� l `• �L ' `y,..x,,F�' I. -4.!. TR c/•-.a .' 4 ._ U The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on March 15, 1995. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code,which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,March 15, 1995. TT8120—Publish March 2, 1995. - FAX TRANSMITTAL - ACE UNDER CITY OF TIG? LOGO DATE: TO: Sue Curran, Legals (fax) 620-3433 FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard (Ph.) 639-4171 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0001/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0001/MISCELLANEOUS (MIS) 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT. The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site Development Review request to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400). ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services,public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. (PLACE VICINITY MAP HERE) The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on . Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM TT PUBLISH DATE: APPLICANT MATERIALS {eve /4.e,id -7/// qe-/ u-, ivitt-et 6ige cto4- CITY TIGARD, 6 411+OF T16 RD, ORE OM ;..: i T QQ ielo Lue PL(f/vQv/a kc // `1K1�€ 13'eAdetrbu�+— ilT TAITTA V I'" CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. S1DQ q: -0C3 OTHER CASE NO'S: fife 94-- 040 / RECEIPT NO. L 5.---Z.60 APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: v v`14 DATE: Ope/a4( 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application el ments submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 8100 4.1,4. bup.t-i VLD. A) Application form (1) 6-11i--)-Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT N0. 2e 1r- LoT 400 authorization i/yW(C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 0.98 etc. ---(-D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* dA►-tErj G . -VtLE L_—(E, Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS 1 80o S.W. p�Tev. PHONE G9$9- 131S kF) Applicant's statement CITY bup4444,M l ZIP 9-7 224 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* jM1as CAavcu_ '—fG) List of property owners and ADDRESS S,AP'lg AS Above. PHONE addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY ZIP ?/(H) Filing fee ( ) *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE 1ETERMID N TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written / 2 3 q authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY 1' l)/ L_._ The owners of record of the subject property (r l � request permission to create a Planned r: : 5C)t4 Development consisting of 3 i p¢e.stAiNiNewp,t7 Conceptual Plan Approval Date: N1t-tAL 0)41WI146, 1b12- l.E'4 j 1/4 K J4 1411.4L c,OMhT - -rED IN 'PHik e. Detailed Plan Approval Date: Planning . Engineering 0526P/13P n......4. 1/CM 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: VA IANGe fb.lz J-;' T-BACk 12.0cQ• 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants - so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of JAµUA�-r 19 9Gj SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. x �v�sli� 4!/ p(,EA.15e SEM10 G01P`( OF 4.1;:'• iZAVOtEW TO 1,4 Ka.t Ta 4k1 EAFArvA o- (KSL:pm/0737P) 'PROPOSAL DESCRIPTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON FILE NO: SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001/MIS 95-0003 FILE TITLE: Castile Project APPLICANT: James Castile OWNER: Same 7800 SW Peters Durham, OR 97224 (503) 639-1395 REQUEST: A request to build three industrial buildings to be constructed in two phases. Upon completion, these two buildings will total 12,000 square feet. The applicant has also requested variance to the 50 foot setback requirement from Durham Elementary School which adjoins the property to the east. LOCATION: 8100 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 130C, tax lot 00400) APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.96, CRITERIA: 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) • The I-P zone allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate and business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale storage and distribution among other uses. CIT: South CIT FACILITATOR: N/A X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION:- VICINITY MAP ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITE PLAN LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) h:\login\patty\proposaLmst _ _ 1 01 ,1 1F-NQMPI,ING-1 and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 CASTILE PROJECT OWNER: JAMES CASTILE 8100 S.W. DURHAM ROAD TIGARD, OREGON 97224 SITE INFORMATION TAX MAP NO.: 2S 1 12CC 13 TAX LOT NO.: LOT #400 TABLE OF CONTENTS: * - CITY OF TIGARD APPLICATION FORM * — ASSESSOR'S MAPS * — VICINITY MAP * — SITE PLAN * — APPLICANT'S STATEMENT * — VARIANCE REQUEST WITH ATTACHED MEMO * — LETTER REGARDING LAND USE NOTIFICATION MEETING * — AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING * — AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING * — MAILING LIST * — SIGN UP SHEET FROM MEETING akh, ir i it - _ _ and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784-Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 January 6, 1995 PROJECT STATEMENT Castile Project The Applicant is proposing to construct three pre-engineered metal buildings to the north of the existing residence/office structure. The project will be phased; with the 2,400 sq. ft. building at the southern property line being constructed immediately and the two 4,800 sq. ft. buildings along the eastern property line being constructed as part of the second phase. Phase two will begin as soon as the majority of the phase one building has been leased. The site will be prepared for phase two during the construction processes of phase one. The structures will be leased (approximately 1,200 sq. ft . spaces) to small businesses. The leasing concept is to provide affordable spaces for businesses who have outgrown their garages/basements but are not able/or need to lease the larger industrial/warehousing facilities. It is believed that this type/size of leaseable space will provide affordable space to an assortment of entrepneurial endeavors. This project will provide new business opportunities for the area which will provide an economic stimulus to the City of Tigard. • �4 F I! !!_I___�• 11,II � P UJ1R ii�T' t and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 January 6, 1995 VARIANCE Castile Project Zoning: IP (Industrial Park) Location: 8100 S. W. Durham Road The applicant is requesting a variance for the eastern side yard set back requirement of 50 feet. It is being requested that a 2'-6" landscaped buffer be provided along this boundary. The Durham Elementary School is located adjacent to this boundary. In 1988 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, changing the school site from Light Industrial to Public/Institutional and a zone change from Industrial Park-Historic District overlay to R-12 Historic District overlay. Because of that action, buildings being constructed adjacent to the school are now required to have a 50'-0" minimum set back from this residentially zoned property. The applicant is proposing to locate the new structures 2'-6" from this property line. There is a chainlink fence along this property line along with an arborvitae hedge approximately 7'-0" tall which will remain as part of the proposed development. The setback buffer requirements did not apply to this site prior to the plan/zone change for the adjacent school property. Under the old light industrial zoning designation there would not be a minimum side yard requirement. Therefore, the hardship was not self-imposed but created by the plan/zone change. The 50'-0" setback requirements is required to create a physical and visual separation between industrial uses and single family residences. The school use is not a typical use for this zone and the conflicts between the proposed development and the school would be less than would be expected of the primary uses of the two zones; residences and industrial. There is an existing chainlink fence and 7'-0" tall i Variance Request January 6, 1994 Page 2 arborvitae hedge along this boundary which will provide a screen between the two sites. The back of the buildings will not have any openings which will provide additional privacy between the two sites. Because of the site configuration, the required 50 foot setback would eliminate the potential development of over forty percent of the site, which would severely restrict the use of the site. If the structures were situated along the western property line, the vehicular movement, parking and other site activities along with their associated noises, would be situated along this boundary and could be disruptive to the school activities. Mr. Castile attended a meeting with personnel from the school district regarding the setback variance. District personnel approved of the site plan and were in favor of the variance. (See attached memo) . The positioning of the buildings achieved the best separation between the two sites. Due to the unique zoning requirements of the school and the long narrow site constraints, the applicant is requesting an approval of this variance request. The the best of our knowledge, the application for a variance satisfies the criteria found in City of Tigard Zoning Ordinances, Section 18. 134.050. Sincerely, c::13c~.....0;1:). (2.41N.A.A.LAA—, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:mlh From : S & L LANDSCr—'NG INC P01 MEMO : Pl.: : CASTILE PR0JBCT R100 S .M . Durham Rd 1 me t wi f i, George Fisher , business Administrator for '. :i _rt‘ r :) %'l ua] atin School hint rict , on January 3 , 1995 t d '_ scrusq with him the p't ?tr s for our property . I OlC!Me ,.1 trim the plans drawn up by Nicoli F-rcgineering - ' owinra him how the buildings would be paced . , P ez, presscd his approval of our plans in placing the bu i l dings with the haC:r~ walls to the property l .i Nc' and thn business activity away from the school . I c xpt _, reed to him the need for a varience due to the coming car the school . Ho agreed that it was better ! c> p) +cce the buildings a :, :sawn and allow a varience , than to eXpose the school to any noise , and traffic . ' 't ' were no negative rern rks . Jirr; Chstilc Ccc>rge Fisher • • 1Y/1-111 i t -,Ii' i ivou SRA lil tn ---,___ISA j 13-ila' Illift .. iii -_-: i 111:111_ TTErm _ _ , '- 1[1_ Ilk `1_.; >. .ic .) TITIIIII1 RA rFono ,..T. x co .__ 1 . - - J._ . —IL--- 7— I 4 13 sw_p_Lig ----/F.-1 -1; - - _ ___,, / SITE L______.r.-- ---- -_, - __-_------ USA i- - 2z.-1 'TREATMENT mo /no' (,'C'. • PLANT •'3_10 pli.IU) (... • .--•c .,, c: ._ s• - - -— --- l 1 I 14 0 12 TR (1) VICINITY MAP 4 SEE MAP 12 2S I I2CC Z; (OLD HWY 217)7-90-leloo rs'W' " T DURHAM T i ROADS 2 p69/3. 14 2" 1ZS 5 i i 773.7 I4 �'' •s I3 I pot 500 401 300 Rfro 600 I I ittAC. a.seAC. I • 400 a 30./9 AC. WI O r 600-MI N I 1 9114c, PVRNAI N ELEMENTARY M I x/1001. a I SITE 4` , jelJ'- �9 —N,w 356.5' O A A o, If O p f O f f ♦ef •I to (W) I • r pO J N I< 0 I I 1 1 2' a 5' L 2 0 9'— --I' o. I � I- .•.14 5 2 7 3. 7' Jn 3• I" r ,, - ^ - 311 8' _ _ _ — 650T I I I I I I in (C.SNo 11250 el , 0 _ II I M1 N N * Mf I I I I I >P I k — — — 650 — — -- H — 1 — 273.7' �A 874.6' __ — — 1 1 I S' F- I ' n CO co 23 -74 I ).. I m 1 0 ' W 1 F t 1 IJ R ' • 1 —.1 20 1 • 1 1 k. 1 1 I 1 I-_ I I 1'2: PC n �o in rte/ < /l S[1(1O "� L o L v, v W IO9 * •0. 2 ° 05 52 '. . 11800 //Ac. o 4 50 40 .e.0 O , 8 a ° * 53'76 ' 3500 . = M 2300 N n 1 1900 / 109 n ;g/' 63 0 ` j 51 „°. 10 • '� 51 40 I r //9s 7e ��34.44 n ox 87 • r D 4 n I I 0 .‘-w 3601 2200 n: 5, . -p 12000 3_ I 4= o ./OAa )0 0 c : 52 'v:r a (C.s. 21,152) �'L�-. 64 • 50 n, 6 g A N ° / Gow 53.78 92.06 ':• 21006 0 3 (p 12100 e._ III 33700 �� titi° .1 53 in*0 o $ .//Ac. 2N 65 a `* INITIAL PT. LN. r' N 112.24 4 49 R• 12200 �/� = II 2 97. °-3800 oo '?� a .t,' 1, 12300 - 9�.r� • !28.29 rte. 3 s' X 5 5 't 113 :2 3 9 00 4' R,� Cyr -a o- I w ./44c. .. / 67 y s A9 OP 12400 102_06_ re ti� $ .r 93.7e A.'4401 +l. �' l' 4 966' ~�, I II4 • o •556 it,� (l,J ■ •,4 8.273 0 _ U. 12500 I o .09Ac. 4 ^f �� �T > 72 4400 5766'.: vl 91 I.5 • ' Oc-iie 78.90 100 OAc. n 4101 69 ° R 4501 R X4500 a el SW PATTI LN. 3 f6 7 N La' I 52 4200to 0 R 4600 7200 zJ ,.'' a4` /660011 102 2 70 2 74-. 2. ., 7100 3070& 6900 I IC X40/)2 Ac. 94 50 „, �F 7000 N 'g Q0 2 4300 s >� 4700 ti 3 . 2 e I m I + �� 0 0 71 (l 75 :. ° 6 52 n 90.11 R•10 / •IO 76 P. N 88°41'al"W �-a . F/ 9!, 106.22 64.60 54' N69°a6'! ,v• .1 �ti / • 222 L. ,t,�80 ND xS SO N� 94.10 22.. R• • �• f T F� - 6500 R•27 aS T` °4 93 �/ 1 55 Z9 10 64 • a4 54 •26.92 842 `5-i / 3 b.O5 ' 5200 5100 5000 4900 121'77 5600 5500 5400 499 4800 • -6400 -X 92(._) g _ - 84 • 83 ' 82 : g 4 80 79 78 ,� 77 76 b 122.16 N69• 42'32•W w 6300_ 61' a '•4 54 64 ■ .217'4 817 q 0o' 5700121 , .t.. ti n X 6200 w 1 v) ` 85 L i 1900 2000 _ 90 10i'4 5800 4'' /.2/ /1/ Ac. /.O3Ac. 100.64 r• . X15 t* 86.<10 89 c " v. 98.47 I FOR ASS 4 , • •' ° • , L ONLY. DO �' ` °� 5900 ANY 0TH 7.44 fj • 1800 18041 1801 a 6000 87 0I o .I6 Ac. /4At.1 A ./5 Ac. a i 88 a n g I • 16'1 37 57.41 71,92 66.39 6E' i »>> L�� N99°56'4 r&-- 114.06 65-5471 1 200 170.9 295.99 -•11W in 2 1 DURHAM t.. _L I ROAD -' 2 Arcot (OLD STATE HIGHWAY 2IT) MAP 1138 SITE • • * Name of applicant Jim & Audrey Castile Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 2 3-7 4 4 0 0 Address or General Location 8 1 0 0 S . W . Durham Rd . AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, James CA s t i i e , do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating Interest In a proposed Land u s E, affecting the land located at 8100 S . W . Durham Rd and did on the 23 day of December , 19 9 4 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Land Us e application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at Front Fence (state location on property) This 23 day of December , 1994 Signature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this 2 3 day of December , 19 q 4 (---->L77/d...>-.7) ;.', ``1 '`-�-�'`�-'`-�a- '� ����-...— Notafy Public for the State of Oregon ,,4 y OFFICIAL SEAL My 6ommission'E xpires: -4::, .41 LARRY J. ESAU f'" ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON \ l� -' COMMISSION NO. 022997 - - r. r' MMISSION EXPIRES MAR. 17, 1997 fir} i WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Iogin\lo\postnot.cit AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD I, JAMrs'C? AwDP-E.WS , being duly sworn, depose and say that on b GaMlaEiz 2 , 19 94- , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 8►00 s.W. 'bu 1z 4A1 1 . , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date Indicated above in the United States Post Office at _Ti ewARP 13tzANGti with postage prepaid thereon. natu e Subscribed and sworn to before me this ') day of V • , 19 �? ,) . GFFI^SAL Sr.41 'q. 6CA NOTA.!i 1 1!:0!IC-C:'.EGON to ublic ` �/ COMMI:33IOiJ NO.037598 My Commission Expires: (} b MY COMMISSION EXPIflE3 OCT.02,1998 h:\login\jo\affmail.cit J - I - _ ; 1111 [ and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 December 23, 1994 To whom it may concern, There will be a meeting to review preliminary plans for the cnnstniction of three separate buildings to the north of the existing office structure for S & L Landscaping (see atlatched sketch). The meeting will be held at the office of Nicoll Engineering on January 5, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. Project Address: 8100 S.W. Durham Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 Meeting Address: 9025 S.W. Center Stree Tigard, Oregon 91223 Contact Person: Nicoli Engineering James D. Andrews • SCHOOL PIST NO. 23J CYNTHIA R ROGERS 13131 S.W. Pa c. Hwyy 15932 S.W. a, Court Tigard, Oregon 91223 Tigard, Oregon 91224 JAMES 4 AUDREY CASTILE 'I LL M1TGH E Ll. silo S.W. Durham Road 1380 S3,1, A01 AVG• Tigard, Oregon 91224 71(1,412-t9, 012.5C1014 ii(2.24t UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY 16580 S.W. 85th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 91224 01).O.T. 411 Transportation Building Salem, Oregon 91310 JUDITH A. BENJAMIN 15965 S.W. 81st Court Tigard, Oregon 91224 EDWARD E. COTTER SO65 S.W. Durham Road Tigard, Oregon 91224 MARION MARLIN GOBLE SO2 5 S.W. Durham Road Tigard, Oregon 91224 RICHARD 4 TERESA BOWEN P.O. Box 94 Tualatin, Oregon 9106 2 MICHAEL N. NEWBERRY 15954 SW. 81st Court Tigard, Oregon 91224 GORDON 4 MELISSA BARRETT 15981 S.W. 81st Court Tigard, Oregon 91224 EDWARD L. YICKREY 15910 S.W. 81st Court Tigard, Oregon 91224 • � SIGN UP SHEET C.I.T. MEETING CASTILE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS PHONE # in,� 1 O 2 '5 5.kl. G 6-N T L 2 _-1 i ,fit, (i S O - 2 c'6 Ce /(. 67;G-iciAN&G,17. 104.c- SW � C-17 a a -r _ JAN. 5, 1995 SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001/MIS 95-0003 CASTILE PROJECT/JAMES CASTILE (page 1 of 1) 2S113B0-00400 2S113B0-00300 CASTILE, JAMES W & AUDREY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 9565 SW INEZ 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97062 TIGARD OR 97123 2S113B0-00500 2S113B0-00401 CASTILE, JAMES & AUDREY OREGON, STATE OF 8100 SW DURHAM RD DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION TIGARD OR 97224 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG SALEM OR 97310 2S112CC-01800 2S112CC-01801 BENJAMIN, JUDITH A BOWEN, RICHARD L AND TERESA 15965 SW 81ST CT PO BOX 94 TIGARD OR 97224 TUALATIN OR 97062 2S112CC-01804 2S112CC-01900 BARRETT, GORDON W & MELISSA J COTTER, EDWARD E AND 15987 SW 81ST CT VIOLA C TIGARD OR 97223 8065 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97223 2S112CC-02000 2S112CC-05800 GOBLE, MARION MARLIN ROGERS, CYNTHIA R 8025 SW DURHAM RD 15932 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CC-05900 2S112CC-06100 NEWBERRY, MICHAEL H KENNEDY, REESE C & 15954 SW 81ST CT RUTH U TRUSTEES TIGARD OR 97224 15943 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CC-06200 2S113B0-00600 JENSEN-JUNGWIRTH, CAROL BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC 15921 SW 81ST CT 2600 CONTINENTAL PLAZA BLDG PORTLAND OR 97219 777 MAIN ST FORT WORTH TX 76102 JAMES CASTILE 7800 SW PETERS DURHAM OR 97224 'T r -- �...�. - - 4 •• _ _ .. - - • NW 1/4 SECTION 13 T2S RI W W.M. 2S I 138 • WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I11=2001 _ SEE MAP , 41. Al)" C/ 1 2S I I2CC V' I -4 `� 1/4 SEC. COR. _ (OLD HWY 217)r TS.W. T DURHAIIA T -1t ROAD T gN/336 1501 g 90-18100 / 13 500 ,.(14 Ac. O 0 CANCELLED TAX LOTS 70 600 - I 1 LS4FAC. _.� _- 1.68Ac. I. 700,701,SOO.900 6000-MI I '�` ar�Iw�r~ELEWA?A *r I 1600.17OLOO,,1i800.1600,1901, Ii00.If00,1�00.1�00.1lOI, i I I — r( WOO,2100,2101,2102. . Wg 366.a_ I o or, 2p j. o ° Q ~ I v ' v. * •� e _ m Y ° I rea W J « I I a L > Ig _ _ 273.7' SI I I 11 r F�/- — — _ - - - - — � I SEE MAP 6 50 I I 2S 1 I3BA . II - ., pp CSNO 11250 • 4 in a O M1 . — — — £50_ — — -- `— — 1 — — — — 273.7' 1 . . It B 74.5' 1 . oe 23 -74 _ . .. _ wil -+1 20' Sy u R9 1 L ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY ir J cOPO DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE <-_,;•-•?.. .4.4 . -r. 25V a3.s3 0P ' 37 50.32 V. "'9, 1-. O ° a / >s.> - c Q:TRr5o. 'Q v 12440 ;+'840() s C ° 52 'v a I (�45' t' v a W�` - -•- 1„'' . - ° 9°fir 12100 �_ ►°� '°°/ 4M1 20 a `f 6tS5 ° �O o 53 v,°v I n w:.?.:;`- / !2 b ~ ° 93.79 d b� f / ti a 95.32 69 ° 3800 °� '� � � BONAVENTURE n LN. a ?200 1 = b 112 ;�_ N = 2 v L r , y 13000 ;# I6 . - 39 • 56.10 S6 S6' 76.9) 9 ` a 12829/ se 7600 ¢ 3900 a tt H / = 12900 12800 12700 12600 7900 7800 7700 0 8 Q 12300 Y 113 p ry Ravi • C/./6 k y w m e 55 . �^ ./4tAc. °� 67 eCy/�� S.W. is W' / �'' r 5 M o 9S' m 102_06_ ?Q HAMLET I a r 4 a / 3 ° r 2 j�l w m I I 10 9 ° 7500 v 12400 f I 93.76 �� t b°�, ,y;, R,z>3 0, 0 4401 STREET r� T� - 4000 ° •W , ra\ IN 17017 PT. 58' S8' 57.11 36' ■ 56' 9� v a 114 q °- � n 72 g . elA7 57.92 S8' 1.96 : .09Ac. • (./68 91 td 4400 SEE • 359 ao 7400 o° 12500 o- 4101 ,� Q 4501 4500 2S I m °r 6 R 1fi m M 57 i 100 °^ 69 p p o I 99.06 360 .w 2' .\4' ( /0 e1 L L1 • ° 7�" l3 "i°" I * 1 100 7306 n 2a 78.90 ...or. 93,e 9s +- 2s MAP 2./B Ac N 5 s� ' 0 ': ;_ $ I I IDD o 3% Sw. PATTIa LN. I 4n`� 420090 p p 4600 p. J o ,� /66 / 102 n 70 74 N �. O �0 1- ='� Q o $ N 7200 a �_� 54 3 �1;./2Ac.a 9u so _ sl :Ir ---.y-.y .' -. _ : • a I d 4 h s•69 3o- r 6900• /-° o - 4300 o it 4700 ° ` .�.. o , 7100 7000 0 / / 0 7I (n 75 °`,. „ , I« I N� .tip 3 n 2 w I 20 I 0 ■ • s2 ° 80.11 8=10 b\ / V=10 81.78 o O oz o / 48.5 `y. N 68°42'51"W N89°56 E mOSI : fir. n 32-e9/ 106.22 _ 54.50 54 I ;. ;; i. S.W. N 207.7 Y� 2 2�}� '� �i S.. r 359 H ~� --R �aaa 222 a\aa°/' p BOND -S7-RE� ei y AVON 15' 150 ISO 94.10 r =25284 C f STREET 209.0 150 #n J6500 R tip° 42 3 ( a� 5200 5100 5000 4900 4800 1600 1700 / a N �`.R=2oo.31 53 3.03 3 ' l 200 1400 0. 121.77 ~ + 5500 5400° 05300^ F '"' r 86Ac. /.34Ac. /.29 AC. /.34 AC. 00-:6400 °-6400 L ° Cr 5600 0 83 0 82 a w gN80 79 78 m 77 °w 76 mm` •"AF Iii •. _.•0 / 92 6 0 84 81 % z Nee° 4z'sz'w 54 . ^ '' :i ,� ro u m 54.80 51 r.v�vv:; ;.� 4 4)• O 122.16 / 1 / 64 54 54 54 sY�� m \.J Y _ o vs►r- r x'6300 q 6I' S5' s a p"' fb� iiirii�:v iiz-zsa iair54 v'., 4S 3 0 N { ° 0 ory /b 91/_, 0 50' 05700121' / $ / & 122-so_ ° _^ 85 LL, °/ 1900 - 2000 o '6200 . I N .1$. 118.70 / /.03Ac. o * . .� ' /.2/Ac. = . ' (cs.18o61) `r o 90(� Q 2a94 5800 0 3. e ..P t 86<N0/ c wi �► 100.64 ��' FOR ASSE. ,a ',, 1._ �- _ - ° 61 89 ��-I 's vP q 98.47 ONLY.DO NC ,i.; , - 1300 r - 100 - _ / 43' a Ti '�( seS� (_1,11 • ANY OTHEF (.,, I r _ ay 03 5900 •/ 73 A c. _ / e �: - I L 18041 118014 6000 87 01 ..: w 1800 e l A a Y. y N In o./6 Ac. /4Ac.1 m •/5Ac. • °� 88 �, /• �,�^ / e :x•-4• ° `0/ P•�bti I ISO N89°56'E 57 SL41 71.5! �3i'aS�a y xoo NSS set n', 4' 114.53 83-547, 91-46267 ISO -^!!: I I �� 209 ISO Ir 295.96 --li 1 J O to r �'° ° 1 DURHAM _- ROAD °S'" (C.R.23 NO WIOTH STATED) (OLD STATE HIGHWAY 217)• I 13 2C' (. ( L (- ---SEE MAP -. . 2S 1 138. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS SCHMIDT SANITARY SERVICE, INC. 8325 S.W. Ross St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Phone 639-2378 Solid Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Drop Box Service Established in 1948 /1)7 / di CO Z !/ .J 1701 hake -5 �. 5-4-4 `j a.#1,f,„-J4.i eae-64._ mi,e4 04-jatore'r--4,1, hZi; rho ,eeey da,e_ ogat_a_iz_ and g 70a as � AA7- iv4o--/744-tvaj _ 0/a>14/ ar44d14- �� nn NICaLi P2750 S.W. 23784fic Hwy. Ls�, OF n�QUVSMIT ENOIN•ER1NG Tigard, Oregon 97223 4 DATE -J00 NO and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 G ATTENTION M Act2-bL -ot-' P RE TO G IT'f DF •t"l Cm.4121:, CAcertLE.. l -D3 'PLANNING,+ "t)EPT RF( Fl"ED Wit'. 1. GENTLEMEN: CUtVtMIJIIIII uc'vCwr�lI I ' WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings I -Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ °cat COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2' 4 G1 N�Q.aV 'IZs�yr5lpKS X A-r o S • lb 9 S I S•5.9 5 2 , Lermtz. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: or approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval 1F6r your use ❑ Approved as noted D Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections D Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO //�� SIGN Qiw► LIMr[Aoiled./ _ . f kl■ w Niii; . _ _ _ . and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 May 10, 1995 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Castile Project SDR 95-001 Dear Mr. Roberts: Please find enclosed two sets of the revised site/landscape plans for the above mentioned project. The following lettered comments are in response to your lettered remarks from the staff report, item #8 (A thru E) under "Conditions". I believe I have made all the necessary corrections and responded to all of your comments. A. A pedestrian walkway has been provided from Southwest Durham Road to the entrances of the proposed buildings. B. Two bicycle racks have been provided and are located in the 20 foot area between the phase 2 buildings. The owner selected this location thinking that the bicycles would be partially protected from the weather at this location. C. A copy of the site plan was faxed to Larry Schmidt, Schmidt Disposal Company, for his review of the proposed trash and recycling enclosure. At his suggestion, we removed the one recycling enclosure. I have attached a letter from Larry for your files. D. The caliper of the proposed trees have been increased to 3 inches which then allows us to qualify for a lower landscape percentage of 24 percent . E. As you will note, the access drive has been relocated to provide a combined joint access for both sites (tax lots 400 and 500) . This was a Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard May 10, 1995 Page 2 requirement from the site development review. By doing this, the trees which would have required a tree protection plan will be removed for the new access. I will be submitting the "civil drawings" and building drawings for review in a couple of days. If you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Aivv�c,p.� k-i O6■a James D. Andrews, Project Manager JDA:mlh Enclosure May 18, 1995 Jim Andrews CITY OF TIGARD Nicoli Engineering 9025 SW Center Street OREGON P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Re : Castile Project/SDR 95-0001 Dear Jim; This letter is in response to the plan check set you submitted for the Castile site . The following is a review of the Planning Division Conditions of Approval : A. Condition A which required a walkway from SW Durham Road to the building entrances is considered met based on the revised plans . B. Condition B which required bicycle racks is considered met based on the revised plans . C. Condition C which required franchise hauler review of the proposed trash and recycling enclosure is still outstanding. You referred to a letter by Larry Schmidt, I have been unable to locate it with the recent package you submitted and will need a copy to review and sign off on this condition. D. Condition D which required the landscape plans to be upgraded in terms of area, or the sizing of landscape materials is still outstanding. I' ll need a copy of the revised landscape plans . E. Condition E which required a tree protection plan is still outstanding. The redesign raises some other issues . How did the overall site depth shrink 15 feet with the same building square footage to be developed? We recommend a plan which preserves trees in place wherever possible. Given the flexibility of the parking ratio standard for this type of use, preserving the existing garage into the site is not required. Was the relocation of the shared driveway dictated by any off-site constraints? Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, o P/ickt.4 ieL&- cwoL.J o � J Mark Roberts '2 ,,��,,{{ Assistant Planner, AICP / Y'" 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 •••••••••• •••� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■�■ rurringnm rm, • 11."111 Ir ■■' 1■1 1 ■I 1 • 1\\.II I\\n\'■►/ soli ■;DWI Imo!-1 Iii:iI Iv1 Eh ■iairiY`iiiikiGbiiiii`J and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street PO. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 June 13, 1995 Mr. Mark Roberts Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Castile Project - SDR 95-001 Dear Mark: This letter is in response to your planning review letter of May 18, 1995. The following comments correspond to your lettered items as noted in your review. C. Please find enclosed a letter from the franchise hauler, Schmidt's Sanitary Service. My apologies, I must have forgotten to include this in my original package. D. The existing trees which will be utilized as "street trees" have a minimum trunk diameter of 5 inches. The new Birch tree which was added is to have a 3 inch diameter trunk. The trees within the parking lot landscaped islands are noted as 3 inch diameter (these have been upgraded from the original 1-1/2 inch diameter) . With these upgrades, I believe we meet the requirements which allow the minimum landscaping percentages to be reduced to 20 percent . E. Condition E requires a tree protection plan. As noted in my earlier letter, these trees will be removed for the common access drive. As required by the comments of the staff report (Condition No. 4, page 1 ; Findings No. 1 , page 3; and Agency comments No. 5, page 4) a common driveway is to be provided for both tax lots 400 and 500. To satisfy this requirement the applicant has located the shared access drive at the property line between the two adjoining properties. This location provides the most logical access point to both tax lots and does not hinder the possible future sale or redevelopment of one tax lot or the other with cross over easements, maintenance agreements, etc. which I Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard June 13, 1995 Page 2 may hinder the sale of one lot or the other in the future. This location will also help alleviate the site distance concern regarding the access onto Durham Road as noted in the staff report. The applicant regrets losing these trees but, if a joint access drive is required as dictated by the above mentioned comments in the staff report, then the decision to locate it at the shared property line makes sense to both properties, both financially and legally. Regarding the overall site depth reduction of 15 feet, the site plan dated January 6, 1995, was incorrectly dimensioned. The 410 foot dimension was to the northern edge of tax lot 401. Previously tax lot 400 was reduced 15 feet in order to create tax lot 401 which is owned by ODOT. This 15 foot discrepancy was noticed during the revisions to the site plan and tax lot 400 was revised to the correct dimension of 395 feet. This discrepancy did not alter the overall building square footage but did reduce the overall site square footage and the associated percentages. (The person responsible for this mistake has been severely reprimanded and docked one week's pay) . I hope this disciplinary action meets your satisfaction. I hope this satisfies all of your questions or concerns. If I have overlooked or not responded adequately to your concerns please feel free to call me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews, Project Manager JDA:mlh __taa,,,�,.:�L�� April 7, 1997 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Nicoli Engineering & Construction Services, Inc. Attention: Jim Andrews, Project Manager 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Minor Modification to Phases I and II of the Durham Industrial Park Dear Jim: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification to the Durham Industrial Park at 8100-8170 SW Durham Road. The requested modification was to add a 2,000 square foot building primarily to be used for storage purposes. The proposed floor plan was to provide approximately 1,200 square feet of storage and an additional 800 square feet of restroom and office space. The Director has approved of this expansion based on the findings provided in your letter dated March 18, 1997, and the related construction plans. Please provide a copy of this letter with your application for Building Permits and feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, 114iX44 (1/6t?t Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP I\CURPLN\MARK R\DURHAM.DOC c: SDR 96-0008 land use file SDR 95-0001 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 q, i i f 11111111111111=11111M1111=11111 I ■■■ I I II 1111■ I ■■■■■w■■11■■11 s + ■■■■■■■■■■■»■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I } I I ! I 1 L ! 8111111 1111■1111■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1111■ w rta�■u■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1111■■■ ►`1 q fir' 1111 far.■1111■■■■■■■l■!•■■■■■ 1�■ 112ViLLi1 1111•11111•111111111111111.111•1111■/■■■■■ ■■■■11B■■■■■■■■■N i �■ I -*sot all egill ivi ifR■■■■■u11■■■11■■11■■■■ and Construction Services, Inc. - 9025 Southwest Center Street • P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503)684-3636 March 18, 1997 Mr,Mark Roberts City of Tigard-Planning Department • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 • ' - RE: Durham Industrial Park-Phase 2 - • , r r - SDR-96-0008,SIT 96-0022 Job#95-0930 - Dear Mr.Roberts: The developers(Jim&Audrey Castile)are requesting to construct an additional-building - - (Building E)in the"landscape island"at the center of the site. The Castile's are '. requesting that this additional structure be approved as a minor modification. • The majority of the structure will be utilized as a storage area for the tenants of the development The 600 square foot room at the north end of the building will be leased. The exact use is unknown at this time,but it is assumed that it will be leased as office space or as a conference room for the on site tenants. The remaining landscaped area on site still meets the required percentage. Additional shrubs/trees have been added to the project at the north of the proposed building(see sheet 1.2.) Parking will generally remain as originally approved,except for the addition of another disabled parking space adjacent to the building(see sheet 1.1.) a new stripped access pathway has been added to the project to connect the new building to the existing pathway system. • Mark Roberts-Planning Department Durham Industrial Park Phase 2 March 18, 1997 Page 2 If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDAJh enclosures •• • • „ , • • . ' • • . . . • • r.•.•• • • mi.o.r.... mialiM11101111111111110111111111104011wlarim .,..-1......4_ iiii • • CITY OF I 1 GARD F.<1 CL 14'1 'AM' 1 T I ei NU. • CIAL I Cif,1„ t4i*IL : I CUL 1 GINIri 141:ER INC 0:r...A i fillOt 111 9 ez-!.9 LLITI • 1'Wavy..NI 1.1111 I-. PO Bt)X •.a3 /8'4 SLIM) I V r riFIRD LOR pupi Of- PriY1141:-.N1 11140UNI PAID PURPOIA. 01- 1.1.1YMI. i11101.irn ii Et . . • . fit-11/1_ 1.1210.. .0121_. . . 1111 MOD IF ICr lull LC -00.1/0:1 • U (C (C .��IE�i C CO M 1�`llli■�, 0 CO �=MI /!gfei.V N 0 't MINIM _ N (N ao %MIlNIM L (� .2211 J:% C N C imam 2 0 N :REo U) m iNU (n o c DUREA.M HN1 ,DUOvirE.H AL IP.k.IRE iii ja-0 C4 ci%r&PROFfr cc t I ...G 1NFF ��^�/ PHA S H, .. w 11135 �i,' I. 'v OREGON / O� 5 ✓'i4,1FS R.1q >" I EXPIRES: 12 :if_n Q al J 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ea.DURHAM ROAD n i ME 0 `�� NICOL I ENGINEERING �[ TGA a SILL$NAFFER SAM ��c 0.1 GENERAL INFORMATION CC scNOOL n U.S.A. 0.2 GENERAL INFORI''1ATION Q CL W TREATMENT 1.1 SITE PLAN PLANT 1.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN 13 GRADING PLAN —1 Z ® 1. 4 FACILITY PLAN VICINITY MAP 2.1 FLOOR PLAN Q Q ° 3.1 ELEVATIONS Cr n J c u) CO c 6 D p E3 QCD Z _ o0E_ rn CD W °° F M CO < < _ _ CC O- D CI U W O HUILDING H,' --, DATE: 3-1+011 8198 SW. DURHAM ROAD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 DRN BY: CHK'D BY: JDA JDA JOB #: 950930 PLANNING SUBMITTAL DWG #: ECOVER —_ MINOR MODIFICATION 0.1 ;MUM C cO N) i■-.-''m i— a u) 1::1�%s N n1 N1 PENN EI.0 N I ,r ,iu11l1Mu ? ,; N cND a„; Iu\1■, - Ni ►!rrxi o c a C) ■■ilil:i�z N c - - :i. l 6 N �%dp Es■IN (Scu THIS PORTION OF TI-E SITE CDABHED)HAS SEEN :VII CO C!1 O DEVELOPED 9PER SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW "p•U m it o 1 I-1 a o O 0) LO iD l9'-O", 95'-5" .. 76'-10" Lib'-7" 61'-0" 4LQ" 4D-o" Ir L�, O I— lr I�._0" 5' r 1T 1 ` ,. 1 I I D PR1 1 1 1---- I-----I I BITE DE L'" C=-CIC-=C i 'I loo'o" / PER PHASE t I- - 111 -- 1 LJ •IIIIIIIHIIIIIIIhi�IiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I ■i' =�1 — ; y j 1 r IA, ` .,-0. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS II i,mi _ 9 ��■■:■■■■■■■■■►��� '.___'111111111111111111111116i�iiiiillillllll11111111111111111111 G I ��r =)�: (� �p ;_ • \ , .-_ �.STORAGE,W / I I ' f�`el4y i 1n 'N 1 �, ( ..-. CO Cox . . �- I :=-0— -,;'�+.�- ^,�,.,..,,, p, N.-, RAMP TO OFFICE III N �� �,\ _/t (PROPOSED) ( " - "°,....» \ EXC 1Fi"? 1 7.31 .cog i Si s I • 111, . 7 III a ithirffededZergege." .022■10, ,IF ..e..art g a r.v.rii mimi N I Novo• a I, M NI 11 ;; IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' 1 II0IlIlHHIHII 101111 aiimmo iiiiiiiiiaiiiir IlimlI . = 11111111 - 1101111 ' o• ,\,_ 4CS ' _ OE LANDSCAPED AREA-TY CES P. VAN ACSIBLE W PARKING SPACE A Z o- -< A CV J CC I~ J = z SITE PLAN - ° 0 Z o - cc NOTES B I T E D A T A Z Z Cr C D _1 0_ &5 F— 11-115 APPLICATION 18 FOR BUILDIIJG"E"ONLY(6196 SLL DURHAM). SITE---- - 51,510 BF- nom) THE SITE DEVELOPMENT WAS APPROVED BY 8PR-56-0006 BUILD II.L'48----- 19,163 BF. (334%) Q AND PERMIT NO.81796-0022 BUILDINGS A B.C,CI AND D HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT R-fr'ERVIDUB 61.4 .4Ge-- 75,957E 8F. (48.%) T /_ !W GJ D HAVE BEEN APPFVED FOR CONSTRUCTION. LANDSCAPED AREA— 17,364.4 SF. (215%) L.L TAX MAP NO. 78 I I2CG F- TAX LOT NO.— 50O U W 7 ADDRESS- 81.3.8 BILL DURHAM RD- TIGARD OR PARKING- 39 SPACES (3 HC-,4 COMPACT,37 STANDAI ) DATE: 3'4.11 1 DRN BY: J[)A CHK'D BY: SE=T JOB #: 950930 DWG #: ESI TEE 1.1 • Y ° x 5 i 11.1—-f—— 2.PI..MIIIINNIM=r■ISIMIN- - �•� — — gym, — — - - - - III., 7 1 \ 14 —■■•■■•••■■u..■..■■■■.�j -' 6 Al I II 1 Lik 1 4; 5 II1IUIIII1iiiiIi • r;' I1IILI� Ii� 11I1I f f ¢1 r i A 3 •• . , WEE it V,, a a a s $ 8igri 0 a ��h • ■ • � I Z _ 11111• I si __ill UL— T. 4itir E 1!ilk- J i •� 1 I in I I 01 - 1 In -T0 I� �. - - —_ 1 u *1114 ,. .. I - > 61 All ;; 4,,-.2g r ri doo g I i-Ih ° tree-- 0V A TN3rrr limn twin 9, dl _ _ 1111111 _ .1>?.. '- Syy r g ,1 1�1��1�I[[[���I I I m 1111 o I II ■ 3 I WILL 6 ap \ _ \ / i l! -I i n op t § z g _1t $ i 0 1 i$1 L' € 1 ° `' a s,u SNaFEER Sao —- i Ii i 1 1 1 . T D ° o = ° n PROJECT: PLANNING SUBMITTAL 111111/4 moilinicirrammal CO 1011111 NMI INIIIIMI I r-,-, m WEEMIEVIAMMWM co 75 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK p tea` c /�� -6111`1.ym���iiiiii '`d�� INIII — F F i�lrliiiliiiilllii�il CO < C V and Construction Services Inc. < a JD ° - — 3025 S.W. Center St. N rn PHASE II BUILDING E I fi k --, ,� ° 47 4;7 Box 23784 a ° �� ' ,S � Tigard, Oregon 97223 o w 8198 S.W. DURHAM RD. i&.,- .' -..." O� Phone: n C ` p TIGARD, OREGON 97224 �� (503) s2o-toss I s Fax: (503) 684-3636 n4' - — — aI Si DURUM ROAD — — t , — — — — ■!'Jl'!11!11■ •■•91111!? A> 113' � n4' r_� LL ..., ::ij !ii!NI I1i111 j r rM' P. :! .'.!!9 I 1111 ri '''Ik* ss -.4 ; 169' 4 ....sos,N--71--------... ,,,,,,,,-,://,,,_.,,, ip A, Li 111' ,,\ I no' ir NORTH I N c■ 1 i P ■mon * ii i 1 K9 i (1 H ice. I r9 r�st r. , Mil Mill I 'J i o - �'&. I I d°� 4limilm =!∎ r-- 166'6� z d __ --- ._min! `� C I 166'\ oo I---- .,,.■_ I RI ; z x IFFB=MO 1---- CI 7] / ; - 1111t:;%.'t■■-, laltall L_ _, d a Ell a Al n I 166' g m 164' a_ 7nr 163' ==. k�, 11 111 1 1 La U J_ mifi�1■ no fTI�I fr 163' .m I lI N. i■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 164' - - - - 't 5111.SRA FGR RON) - - J o = ° °a PROJECT: PLANNING SUBMITTAL misirrI\imonli■�i m z , i►\I■1■F■■H■1■11■�1 XI ' Ili V!PINIMMNIMENIII c�'j 5610'16ii ilail a■t.dl■►IIIDI DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK s ���c �y ��� i�lrliiilfii�iiliiiii and Construction Services Inc. • GI Ca - -- -; � -v 9025 S.W. Center St. PHASE II, BUILDING E ■ ; ° P.O. Box 23784 rn 8198 S.W. DURHAM RD. z q �� � Tigard, Oregon 97223 7a o TIGARD, OREGON 97224 ^,� Phone: (503) 620-2086 D cfl Cn Fax: (503) v e�—Z s3s I o D ...z..."31,1 G;C1rLi c co Ni Ill`lllr■N 0 r) .1�lrMi 2 /'_'grni U N 0 v.1- 1••1ri!7 N N 2 bailliiiil(;))■!•Iliii c N c .. .. I'■•Ir►1il S O c i/N��C - X o` ' '!J o w 0 r i��U U) ui I1 p EXISTING 6ANIYARY SEWER LIFE- �-6 EXISTNG BURIED PIPE-��1 ' �1 NO O pi L i� TRENCH PER PHASE I I I ILA&STUBBED TO THE SITE!PHASE 2) R — — — —� 'MANHOLE p 01 a_ 1- a. Lb_ DURING PHASE I DEVELOPMENT. THE LINE o I I p'•6D. LULL BE EXTENDED TO PHASE 2 AND I F-T �J `0 PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE DEVELOPMENT. ;�I-J — — — — Q` PROFFtcr As)10.TORM SFmLER LIE -4l 3 EXISTING 1 I/2•W ATER SERVICE EXIST FIRE HYDRANT LINE I EASE/LENT(PHASE ONE) G N LIE Q� INSTALLED PER PHASE I INSTAL ED PER PHASE I I arE CU761DE .* �N' EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT I OF LINE FOR ThcL n 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 111.' .4 7211J.)//V/V//1LLLLLLn 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 16I I I I (t•wNA6E 1) I C _�C__ .1 OF DISAWING. L_LJ_1_L_LJ_JL_LJ_1_1 J_1aJ1 �• _-_1�1E-=1L p 37', I - - — — CO., I II I1 I I I 19 I OREGO / ■uIlIuIIiIuII111111 hIIIIIIIIIIIIuIIuIIIII1IIII 11III NEW RAIN '_o• ✓ `4141'17,' 1 11S■■■■■■■.■■■■+ ■ :II 7:•.1-g DRAIN LINE ik 4,_0. '14,. CIO IIIIIIIIINIIIIIIf���i�I���I��111111111Nlllilllilll Fs R.N� . •C.C. 3Y 6D PROf�06ED BURIED PIPE TRENCH '�H if I ■ 6°DOw (50 LF). ■�— II • (PHASE UF1RE F11D IL '� II SEE J •• !1 g •---.— ii I EXPIRES: 12-31-98 I I w■� 1 email:: ,," WATER LINE TO PHASE 2 7'+ �3— II in : �� g FROM RHASEE IITALLED O— 11 la ae ■1 i d 03 ID .Z.IELi C 47 r) n h r y rol I 64 P* r ���I/I:s N MI w� Y MK • o I a hN I ����I v N O .t I PIN o PIN 5 �. N N CO }a 1.MAX MA1c I 1 ' 1��4��N Cr; rani m O O Lei C• N C v u GCAR FLOOD EPACE •• 4I j U N g P .LATE PPE OR P IKAIDE COVER utM aar�AREA rou Er PAf43t �H■!� 3 ID � o0 0 f 1 0 R r_ 7 ��,U N m v O to� * a ,- ' A ,\.r . 17 o rn ri F IL I.L. O PRO/� ^ . 6 e . T .; 1 n Pitt i ���� Ci 1 N F "F�f2 ate cLeArw+ca-� n rvL rct atAwv� . • �� F Cam$ ctrnc •` 11.1 .% !Al lPW11lly7t NC a&OLCAWW2 (Al SACK INLl (N NOT RAU r. DISABLED RESTROOM DETAILS OREGON N.T.S. � �pot.N\G / 100'-0" I EXPIRES. 127,i17-6P,_J 60'-0" 40'-0" / g t_g NON-BEARING WALL NON-BEARING WALL t ONE HOUR WALL ' 2x4 AT 24" 0.C. 11J/ Itb" 2x4 AT 24" O.G. W/ ity" 1 GYP.BD. EACH SIDE GYP BD. EACH SIDE NZ �0 ® Q Q B---do•I . � c., W _ OFFICE/GONE ,,1x .; oa]l �' 1.61 STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE J 0 30'x20' ■ 20'x20' 10'x20' 10'x20' 10'x20' 10x20' Z 1 9 0 3 68 GRAB BARS 0 P (SEE DETAILS) ' J °' Q `fl NON-BEARING WALL D m o w in 9 Ef 2x4 AT 24" D G. W/ " o o in GYPBD_ EACH SIDE Z 1=111=0 Cr) o 3010 rn cThc `� 3068 3068 W oo i — _„- A Q , , Cn �� i 8'x8' DOOR o 8'x8' DOOR 8'x8' DOOR o 8'x8' DOOR L 40x30 SL- I 40x30 SL 40x30 SL 40x30 SL 40x30 SL 40x30 SL CC CL. 3 8 11 0 9 -10 1/2 9 —0 1/2 9 —0 1/2 9 —0 1/2" ` 4'-6" / �2'-9 1/2" I 4" o 5'-4 1/2"' 3'-8" / / / w 0 0 0 © C? • 6 DATE: f-t4-a-1 N DRN BY: PSP FLOOR PLAN 1 I WALLS PER MANUFACTURED CHK'D BY: JDA R I/8" - 1' 0" BUILDING SUPPLIER (SUNWARD) JOB #: 950930 T H WALLS PER TENANT IMPROVEMENTS DWG : EFLOOR 2.1 U c0 (0 ::�i�i co NO �,-0„ -11`111�1 U) 0 LO 1 20 -0 2'-0 .__w4lf G) N i 1, \ - -- n ...ra, N O s'-0" I i 1 � �' f2 m 20'-0 y , 12 %O\lli N 12 Iiii. 13 "'nil.,=, c 1•�ra� N 13 i!dNllo�c o X o II o vi UIIIIIIIIIIIth1T DI NG CTYP.) � ,K el I � �, IFEpn CL CC•1> GINF �. o '• w 11 ,Vi 30T0�T .r L�—n —- --�-� _ OREGON/ / ✓�<Y t 7,�9�1 � NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION („-04,17, 1/81' = 1'-0" -- 1/8" = 1'-0° I EXPIRES: 1 3 -98 1 '....■■................................ ...•................... .' 01 00101 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III j I Q W (3 J Z Q N EAST ELEVATION om J Q v8° = r-m° C) m = Z � RIBBED METAL RIBBED METAL D o cc= 0 7.--r- ROOF PANELS SIDING (TYP.) z = �; a co W Q Q o - L 1 - Q N > W ti W a 0_ i DATE: 3- 11-,11 SIDEWALK RAMP TO OFFICE (4) 8' x 8' RAMP TO STORAGE DRN BY: PSP OVERHEAD DOORS (TYP.) AREAS CHK'D BY: JDA WEST ELEVATION JOB #: 950930 1/8" = 1'-0° DWG #: EEEEV 3.1 FEBRUARY 18, 1998 MR. MATHEW SCHEIDEGGER CODE COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 DEAR MATT: THANK-YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR HELP AND ATTENTION TO MY CONCERNS. I HAVE MADE A LIST FOR YOU OF THE BUSINESSES IN THIS COMPLEX AND WHAT THEY DO, TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR YOU AND MR. ROBERTS TO DETERMINE AND EVALUATE THE SITUATION. IN FRONT YOU HAVE THE DOG GROOMER, IPD OFFICE,AND UPSTAIRS A SMALL OFFICE LEASED TO A BOOKKEEPER. IN THE NEXT BUILDING TO THE LEFT IS, IN ORDER,TEMPRESS- DISTRIBUTES COMPUTER COMPONENTS; LAMINATION TECHNOLOGY- OFFICE;AVES LABS- RESEARCH;TE REPAIR-REPAIRS PAINT MACHINES; ADHESIVE GRAPHIX-LABEL PRINTER; SKYE UNLIMITED-MANUFACTURES WOOD PRODUCTS;KITCHEN CRAFTERS- REMODELS KITCHENS;PLANTSCAPES-INSTALLS AND MAINTAINS LIVE PLANTS FOR BUSINESSES. TRIAX,INC-INTERNET SERVICE;OPTICAL SUBASSEMBLIES-SPECIAL EQUIPMENT TOOLING; WTE-RECYCLES TONER(PEOPLE ALSO LIVING THERE) BRITTLE KITTLE-CANDY MANUFACTURER;JC-LUTTLE TILE CO.-INSTALL TILE; CANUTT CUSTOM HOMES-GENERAL CONTRACTOR; CONVENIENT HOUSEWARES- HOME EQUIPMENT FOR TEMPORARY HOUSING;KINMAR CONSTRUCTION- CONTRACTOR;LAMINATIONS TECHNOLOGY-MANUFACTURES COMPONENTS FOR ALLIED SIGNAL ETC.; IN- FRONT IN LARGE BUILDINGS- LIGHTSIDE-A MINISTRY; SAPERE CHOCLATIER-MANUFACTURES TRUFFLES. IN THE CENTER IS RUTH'S BAKERY-WHOLESALE BAKERY. MINI STORAGE ROOMS BESIDE RUTH'S BAKERY. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDED ME, RETAIL, MINI-STORAGE, AND MANUFACTURING OF FINISHED GOODS, CANNOT BY ZONING, MAKE-UP MORE THAN 20% OF THE TENANTS IN THE COMPLEX. TENANTS THAT CLEARLY FALL IN THIS CATAGORY ARE: MIN-STORAGE UNITS RUTH'S BAKERY SKYE UNLIMITED SAPERE CHOCOLATIER BRITTLE KITTLE OTHERS ARE PROBABLY QUESTIONABLE. THESE MAKE UP AT LEAST 7,000 SQUARE FEET,AND PROBABLY MORE. TRAFFIC AND PARKING HAVE BEEN A CONSTANT PROBLEM AT IPD. NOW THERRE ARE IMMEDIATE PLANS TO ALLOW A RETAIL STOREFRONT ON AT LEAST THE FIRST FLOOR OF WHAT HAS BEEN WESTSIDE MOWER, NEXT TO SAPERE CHOCOLATIER. THIS WOULD ADD AN ADDITIONAL BURDEN ON THE ALREADY DIFFICULT SITUATION; AND WOULD PUT THIS COMPLEX IN FURTHER VIOLATION OF THE ZONING. PLEASE BRING THIS PLACE INTO THE ZONING CODE. THE CASTILES COULD FIRST OF ALL NOT ALLOW THE RETAIL AT WESTSIDE MOWING,AND COULD THEN MIX UP THE TENANTS BETWEEN THIS COMPLEX AND THEIR NEW ONE ON 74TH TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE ADHERING TO CODE. IF THEY HAD DONE THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE, IPD WOULD NOT HAVE THE CONSTANT PROBLEMS THEY HAVE HAD. YOU IMMEDIATE ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. I ALSO FORSEE PEOPLE TRYING TO PARK ON DURHAM, ON THE STREET BECAUSE THERE IS NOT RETAIL PARKING;TO ADD TO THE PROBLEMS. IF I CAN BE OF FURTHER HELP, OR IF YOU HAVE SUGGESTIONS AS TO HOW I MIGHT PERSUE THIS FURTHER PLEASE LET ME KNOW. SINCERELY, TIA ROSS SKYE UNLIMITED CC:MR. MARK ROBERTS L ISC04s lvl 4 doss Qtn� ,,,, 111e • .aud— tee_ ‹)i-Q- 1.1.0 0;01.4)6,15 Ut) utAd Nfrci -exist/ "I • Skye 11„u.1-e4la,4{. FSI y2,w to4,.4, O. 1.?ox Z3o3Z6 aA,61, G 972.431 /IN IND ;TRIAL PARK ON DURHAM J��, (as��I� ip )1), 63Q- l 7 61S 8100 SW Durham Road • Tigard, OR 97224 .��ti 7e542, 41�� Phone: (503) 968-6764 • Fax: (503) 624-8280 TENANT UST February 25, 1998 ESSENTIAL BUSINESS SERVICES WTE, INC. 9(e-no 8100B SW Durham Road 8168 SW Durham Road Bookkeeping services Recycling toner G.!' CANINE COUNTY CLUB .' THE BRITTLE KITTLE 8104 SW Durham Road 8172 SW Durham Road Dog grooming Candy manufacturing and shipping v TEMPRESS ASSOCIATES JC TILE 8110 SW Durham Road 8174 SW Durham Road Manufactures representatives Tile and marble contracting WILLAMETTE TRADING CO. CANUTT CUSTOM HOMES 8116 SW Durham Road 8176 SW Durham Road Wholesale floral distributor Custom home design and construction AVES LAB PIPE-TEK 8122 SW Durham Road 8180 SW Durham Road Laboratory Engineering TE REPAIR KINMAR CONSTRUCTION 8128 SW Durham Road 8182 SW Durham Road Paint tinting equipement repair Construction contractor ADHESIVE GRAFFIX 5 VLAMINATION TECHNOLOGY 8136 SW Durham Road 8184 SW Durham Road Manufacturing adhesive graphic products Manufacturing laminated products SKYE UNLIMITED WESTSIDE MOWER & REPAIR 8142 SW Durham Road 8192 SW Durham Road Manufacturing bird feeders Small engine sales and service KITCHEN CRAFTERS SAPERE CHOCOLATIER 8148 SW Durham Road 8194 SW Durham Road Custom cabinetry Candy manufacturing and wholesale INTERIOR SCAPES LIGHTSIDE 8154 SW Durham Road 8196 SW Durham Road Indoor plant service Studio production; ministry v TRIAX RUTH'S CHEESECAKES & SPECIALTIES, INC. 8162 SW Durham Road 8198 SW Durham Road Internet provider; computer services Bakery;food service OPTICAL SUBASSEMBLIES -- 8166 SW Durham Road )�J C. -3°O ( (O Light opto-mechanical design and fabrication