Loading...
SDR1995-00014 SD R95 - 00014 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ALA CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon • NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER q BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONCERNING CASE NUMBER(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0010 VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 CONCfRN/NGF/!f7/TIft5.2- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING NAME OF OWNER: John Duncan NAME OF APPLICANT:: John Duncan ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:: 16055 SW 74th Avenue City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY.: 16055 SW 74th Avenue City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 TAX MAP S LOT NO(S).: WCTM 2S1 13AB, tax lot 800 Request: . The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a 13,970 square foot industrial building and Sensitive Lands Review to perform landform alterations within the 100-Year Floodplain, 100-Year Floodway and Wetlands areas to connect to an existing sanitary sewer line in Fanno Creek. The Hearing's Officer denied the applicants request for a five foot setback variance to the 20 foot corner sideyard setback requirement to SW 74th Avenue. Zone: Planned Industrial (I-P). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.68, 18.84, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.134, 18.160 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. Action: > ❑ Approval as requested J Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: J Owners of record within the required distance J Affected governmental agencies J The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator J The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON DECEMBER 26, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted City and findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Ci of Tigard 9 Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of$315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of$500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 26, 1995. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (503) 639-4171. SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER {COVER SHEET} BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR TIGARD, OREGON Regarding a request by John Duncan for a ) FINAL ORDER Site Development Review to develop an ) SDR 95-0014 industrial/office building, a Sensitive Lands ) SLR 95-0010 Review to alter the land form to connect to ) VAR 95-0009 a sanitary sewer line in the 100 year flood ) (John Duncan) plain and wetlands along Fanno Creek, and ) a Variance from the side yard setback standards. I. FINDINGS The hearings officer adopts and incorporates herein the Tigard Community Development Staff Report dated November 20, 1995 (the "Staff Report"), including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval standards, agency comments, and evaluation of the request, except to the extent expressly modified. II. HEARING The hearings officer conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on November 27, 1995. The following testimony was offered in relevant part. 1 . City Planner Mark Roberts summarized the staff report. He recommended two revisions to the conditions: a. A new condition 9i should be added related to the front setback variance request, which was withdrawn by the applicant. It was recommended in the staff report that the applicant revise the site plan to show a minimum 20 foot front yard setback from SW 74th Ave., but the conditions failed to incorporate the setback requirement. b. Condition 9d deals with the 15-foot pedestrian/bike pathway easement. The City would be willing to stipulate that the alignment of the trail be placed in areas other than those the applicant proposes to develop. 2. The hearings officer said that she had drafted potential added and amended conditions to cover discrepancies between the staff report and the proposed conditions: a. New condition 9i: The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide at least a 20-foot setback from SW 74th Avenue. SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 1 b. Amended condition 6: The site plan shall be revised to eliminate intended street crossing; revise the width of proposed driveways to the parking on the east side of SW 74th Avenue to conform to City standards; consolidate the proposed driveways to a maximum of one driveway on each side of the street which should be aligned directly opposite each other; and show the 100-year floodplain. (Underlined language is new). 3. Jim Andrews, Nicoli Engineering, representing the applicant, had four concerns regarding the staff report: a. Mr. Duncan wanted to have the hearings officer consider his application for a variance of 5 feet from the required 20 foot setback. b. Mr. Duncan has a concern about the proposed condition requiring construction of a sidewalk and a curb along SW 74th Ave. Mr. Duncan is in the process of purchasing the Burlington Northern Railroad property and he would like to defer putting in curbs and making improvements to the property until he purchases the property. Mr. Duncan improved SW 74th in 1988 on his own, so he has some reservation about making further improvements when he has already paved the street and installed sidewalks on the street. He questions making curb improvements on the site that he does not own that belongs to the railroad. Several years ago he went to the expense of improving the street and Tigard didn't require curbs. The existing parking was built several years ago and Tigard didn't require curbs. He is only adding 53 spaces to the existing parking and he doesn't understand why Tigard is requiring curbs now when it didn't require them then. c. Mr. Duncan has a concern about the condition requiring the dedication of a 1 5-foot easement for the pedestrian bicycle pathway. Mr. Duncan opposes the open- ended easement agreement that Tigard requires him to enter for this project. He would like some language in the condition so that he would have some participation in the location of the pathway and its impacts on his property. d. Regarding the proposed condition to consolidate the driveways, Mr. Andrews pointed out that of the five driveways in the plan, four are existing driveways. One is to a loading dock that goes to a service door in the existing Jadco building. He said the site will function fine if one of the driveways to the Railroad property is closed, but if the driveway to the service door is closed that would create a hardship for the Jadco operation. III. SITE VISIT The hearings officer visited the site before the hearing without the company of others. She observed the site, the parking lot, the existing building, access, the nature of surrounding development and terrain, and condition of surrounding streets. SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 2 IV. DISCUSSION 1 . City staff recommended approval of the application subject to conditions in the ' Staff Report. The hearings officer finds that the Staff Report contains all the applicable standards for the application and the findings showing that the application can comply _ with those standards. Except for the variance request, those findings are not disputed in large part. The hearings officer adopts those findings as her own, to the extent they are not disputed as expressly provided otherwise in this final order in support of a decision to approve the Site Development Review and the Sensitive Lands Review requests. 2. The record was kept open for seven days to obtain additional information on the request for variance from side yard setback standards. The applicant included the variance request in the original application and the city included it within the notice of public hearing but the applicant withdrew the variance request and it was not addressed in the Staff Report. a. The applicant supplied written argument in favor of his request for a 5-foot variance from the 20-foot setback requirement from SW 74th Ave. in letters dated June 27, 1995 and December 1 , 1995. The City staff evaluated the variance request in a December 4, 1995 memorandum to the hearings officer and recommended the hearings officer deny the request. b. The two letters from the applicant differed on whether the requirement is for a 20 or a 35 setback and whether the existing Jadco building has a 15 or 20 foot setback. In the first letter the applicant erroneously thought the setback required was 35 feet rather than 20 feet and stated that the Jadco building has a 20 foot setback. In the second letter the applicant corrected the setback required and stated that the Jadco building has a 15 foot setback. The hearings officer notes that the applicant's representations of the setback of the Jadco building's setback are inconsistent. The plans, prepared by the applicant, show the Jadco building has a 20 foot setback, whereas the applicant's December 1 , 1995 letter says it has a 15 foot setback. The hearings officer concluded she did not need to resolve the inconsistency because deciding compliance with the variance standards pivoted on two unrelated criteria, Tigard Community Development Code (TCOC) 13.134.050(A) subsections 2 and 4. Subsection 2 requires that the special circumstances that exist on the site not be applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. The application does not meet this criterion because the 100 year flood plain and wetlands areas constraints exist for other properties along Fanno Creek and along SW 74th Ave. in the same zoning district. Subsection 4 requires that the hardship not be self imposed. The application does not meet this Criterion because the majority of the proposed building meets the setback standard and with slight adjustments the remainder of the building could comply. 3. Regarding the proposed condition to construct the sidewalk along the west frontage of SW 74th and a curb along the east SW 74th on the leased portion of the Burlington Northern site, Mr. Roberts said that although Mr. Duncan doesn't presently own the parking site he proposes to develop the site with parking spaces and landscaping. The staff feels TCDC section 13.164, street utility improvements standards, requires these SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 3 sidewalk and curb improvements. The Code doesn't require sidewalks on both sides of the street, so the staff didn't require sidewalk improvements on the east side of 74th Ave. But, the curbing replaces the existing system of ditches on the east side of SW 74th Ave. Because Mr. Duncan is making permanent improvements to the Burlington Northern Railroad site, the staff feels that the curbing is essential to that property and the parking is part of the office warehouse development. He said that the parking use was not required to be a separate application because it is within 300 feet of an industrial building. As the applicant has designed the proposed development, the Duncan building would use the majority of the parking. The TCDC requires the provision of 50 spaces for the new building, so 50 of the 53 proposed parking spaces are required as part of this warehouse/office project. Because the applicant is developing the railroad site for parking to serve the proposed building the TDCD requires the curb improvements. 4. The hearings officer noted that the location of the bikeway easement will be a matter of negotiation between the property owner and the City. Mr. Andrews said that if that were the case that would be fine, but there was no language that assured Mr. Duncan that he would have some say about where the easement will go and what kind of impacts it will have on his property. The hearings officer asked Mr. Andrews if Mr. Duncan would feel more comfortable if the following phrase were added to condition 9d: the applicant shall negotiate with the City and enter an agreement." He responded it would. 5. Mr. Roberts stated that the staff would not oppose leaving the existing service driveway open because of the design of the existing Jadco building and the limitation of the rest of the site in accessing the main driveway that would be designed to serve both the proposed building and the Jadco building. He said that the staff would support a total of three driveways between the two sites instead of the five proposed. V. CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request does or can comply with the applicable standards of the City of Tigard Community Development Code and should be approved, subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report as modified by this final order. VI. ORDER The hearings officer approves the applicant's request for SDR 95-0014 and SLR 95- 0010 subject to the conditions of approval in Section VI of the Staff Report as modified by this final order, but denies the variance request VAR 95-0009. 1 . The following new condition 9i should be added: The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide at least a 20-foot setback from SW 74th Avenue. SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 4 2. The following conditions should be amended as follows: a. Condition 6: The site plan shall be revised to eliminate intended street crossing; revise the width of proposed driveways to the parking on the east side of SW 74th Avenue to conform to City standards; consolidate the Proposed driveways so there is a maximum of three driveways; and show the 100-year floodplain. [Amended language is underlined]. b. Condition 9d: The applicant shall negotiate with the City and enter an agreement or contract which says that the applicant will grant a 1 5-foot access easement to the City for the purposes of providing a pedestrian/bicycle pathway. This easement shall be located within the floodplain area and the alignment of the trail will take place in areas other than those proposed to be developed. The agreement shall be valid for a period of 12 months while the City undertakes a study to determine the preferred location of the pathway along this section of Fanno Creek. [Amended language is underlined]. Dated this 13th Day of December 1995 c.ZG4/ Deniece B. Won City of Tigard Hearings Officer SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 5 AGEND, .1 EM: 2.1 HEARING DATE: 11/27/95 7:00 PM BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by John STAFF REPORT Duncan to develop a 13, 970 SDR 95-0014 square foot industrial building. SLR 95-0010 VAR 95-0009 I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Duncan Industrial Building SUMMARY: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a 13,970 square foot industrial building and Sensitive Lands Review to perform landform alterations within the 100-Year Floodplain, 100-Year Floodway and Wetlands areas to connect to an existing sanitary sewer line in Fanno Creek. The Applicant has withdrawn his application for a Variance. APPLICANT: John Duncan OWNERS: Same 16055 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (l-L) ZONING DESIGNATION: Planned Industrial (I-P) LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AB, tax lot 800) APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42. 18.68, 18.84, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.134, 18.160 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: > Approval Subject to Conditions HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014,SLR 95-+)010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 1 II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Background Information: The site is bisected by Fanno Creek. Much of the site is within the 100-Year Flood Plain or contains wetlands. The site is also developed with an existing industrial building, outdoor storage and parking lot uses located towards the corner of SW 74th Avenue and SW Durham Road. B. Site Size and Shape: The gross property acreage is 6.64 acres and roughly rectangular in shape with dimensions of 352 feet along SW Durham Road and 642 feet of length along SW Durham Road. C. Existing Uses and Structures: A portion of the property south of the proposed development site has an existing industrial building with outdoor storage areas. The majority of the site is undeveloped at this time. D. Surrounding Land Uses: The properties immediately to the north, east and south of the site are zoned Planned Industrial (I-P). To the north and east are properties which are developed with light industrial uses. To the west are areas zoned for residential use. To the south and west of the property are areas which are developed with single-family residential uses. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code: 1. Section 18.68 (Planned Industrial Zoning District) allows a range of light industrial uses developed within an Industrial Park setting. The applicant has proposed office and warehouse uses which are among those uses permitted within a light industrial park setting. A maximum height of 45 feet is permitted for habitable structures. Based on the limited topographic change around the proposed structure, the building would not exceed a height of 34 feet which complies with the building height limitations. Section 18.68 specifies that the minimum landscaping requirement shall be 25 percent. The site plan indicates that the total site area is 6.64 acres. The areas to be maintained as wetlands or within the 100-Year Floodplain are not specifically HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010 - DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE identified by a—eage amounts, however, the applicatc,,. does include the acreage to be developed and the percentages of each development site to be landscaped. The applicant states that 15% of the portion of the site is to be developed with the new industrial building. A large portion of the 6.64 acres is within Wetlands, 100- Year Floodplain and Floodway Areas which are not expected to be developed in the future. For this reason, the percentage of landscape of the overall site will continue to be in excess of the 25% minimum landscape standard. The applicant indicates that a minimum of 40% of the excess railroad right-of-way to be developed as a parking lot is to be landscaped. Overall, the applicant has provided a minimum of twelve parking lot trees for the 53 parking spaces which is in excess of the one tree for each seven parking ratio requirement. Areas which are not planted with street trees are proposed to be planted with lawn or shrubs in compliance with the applicable landscape standards. 2. Chapter 18.84.040(A) states that the Hearings Officer shall approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: (a) Landform alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. This project shall preserve the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway as this project proposes to add no net fill. The sewage connection will, therefore, not impede water flow or increase volume within the floodplain. No development is allowed in residential floodplains in order to retain storage capacity for the 100-year flood and to not impede flow. (b) Landform alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The subject project is in area designated as Industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, therefore, this type of landform alteration is permissible. (c) Where a landform alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. This land form alteration will not result in any increase in the surface elevation of the 100-year flood as discussed previously. As indicated in (#1) above, floodplains are restricted from development in order to retain 100-year flood capacity. HEARLNG'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014,SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 3 (d) The landform alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely. The Tigard Park Plan indicates that the floodplain area within this parcel is part of the proposed pedestrian pathway system. However, staff does not know the location of the pathway, and will not, until a future study determines the preferred location. It should also be noted that neither of the adjoining properties currently contains a pathway which would allow a connection to the pathway system. Staff, therefore, concludes that construction of a pathway is not timely and recommends that the applicant only be required to provide a 15 foot access easement to allow the City to construct a pathway in the future. Such requirements must be roughly proportional to the impact of the use. In this case the estimated value of an easement of sensitive lands is $9,641. This compares to an unmitigated impact of the development on the transportation system ranging conservatively from $27,673 - $26,766 according to the Larson methodology utilized in the Dolan finding (calculations indicated on the two (2) page FINDINGS - ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY exhibit attached.) Prior to obtaining building permits, it is recommended that the applicant sign an agreement or contract which states that the applicant will grant a 15 foot access easement to the City for the purposes of providing a pedestrian/bicycle pathway. This easement shall be located within the floodplain area. The agreement shall be valid for a period of 12 months, while the City undertakes a study to determine the preferred location of the pathway along this section of Fanno Creek. (e) The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. This criteria is not applicable as a pathway will not be constructed in conjunction with this application. Further, a sensitive lands review will be required for the actual construction of the path and will be reviewed for compliance with this section. (f) The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers. (g) Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 4 suffc._ .t open land area within and adic._..nt to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. The applicant has been conditioned to provide a 15 foot access easement which is sufficient to provide for a pedestrian pathway in accordance with the pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. While staff recognizes that residential development within the floodplain is not permitted and the property within the floodplain will, therefore, remain undeveloped. The City would welcome the voluntary dedication of the floodplain area by the applicant. Such a dedication would leave the City with the responsibility of flood control maintenance, as well as maintaining this area in its natural state. Otherwise, the applicant shall provide deed restrictions which restrict use of this floodplain area, provides maintenance of the floodplain storage capacity and maintains the area in its natural state. 3. Chapter 18.84.040(D) states that the Director shall approve or approve with conditions an application request for sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: (a) The proposed landform alteration or development is neither on wetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within 25 feet of such a wetland. The proposed storm line will be within a wetland area but it is not designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map, nor is it within 25 feet of such a wetland. (b) The extent and nature of the proposed landform alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use. The disturbance is the minimum disturbance necessary to accommodate the connection to a existing 60" sanitary sewer line in Fanno Creek. (c) Any encroachment or change in on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated. This project does not propose to change on-site or off-site drainage. (d) Where natural vegetation has been removed due to landform alteration or development, erosion control provisions of the Surface Water Management program of Washington County must be met and areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted in like or similar species in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. The minimal amount of vegetation loss expected with construction will be re- vegetated. Erosion control measures shall be as conditioned by the approved Division of State Lands permit or site work permits. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 5 (e) All other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met. Other sensitive lands requirements have been met as addressed in this report. (1) The provisions of Chapter 18.150, Tree Removal, shall be met. No tree removal has been proposed. (g) Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natural Areas, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies are satisfied as discussed below. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. The sensitive lands request is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item was provided to owners of property in the vicinity of the site. Policy 3.1.1 provides that the City shall not allow development in areas meeting The definition of wetlands under chapter 18.26 or areas having slopes in excess of 25% except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development. (Note: This policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.) Policy 3.1.1 is satisfied because engineering techniques will provide a connection to the existing sanitary sewer in Fanno Creek and the applicable approval criteria for development in wetland areas have been satisfied. Policy 3.2.1 provides that the City will prohibit any development within the 100-year floodplain that would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year floodplain. Policy 3.2.1 is satisfied because this proposal will not result in any rise in the elevation of the 100-year floodplain. Policy 3.2.2 provides that the City shall prohibit development in the floodway, except if the alteration preserves or enhances the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. Policy 3.2.2 is satisfied because this development will preserve the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. 4. Section 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) provides standards for landscaping and screening for between uses of varying intensity. On three sides of the property the portion of the site to be developed is adjoined by areas zoned for industrial use so the buffer setback does not apply to these areas. To the west the site is adjoined by residential areas, however, the Fanno Creek provides a buffer between these areas and the proposed industrial use. The applicant has not proposed to orient service or loading areas towards residential areas to the west of HE.-ARLNG'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 6 the site. Al:. gone of the proposed development is user than 220 feet to the westerly edge of the parking lot. Because the proposed site improvements do not adjoin the property line no land use screening and buffering is required to screen the new uses from residential areas to the west of the site. Section 18.100.030 requires street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires narrow street trees (under 25 feet tall) to be spaced, no greater than, 20 feet apart. The applicant's plans show sixteen (16) chanticleer flowering pear trees to be spaced twenty (20) feet apart on the center, thereby, meeting the tree requirements. 5. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4)(b) requires screening of storage areas as viewed from all directions regardless of the adjoining land uses. Currently the property owner stores barrels related to the existing use. It is recommended that the applicant provide a plan to screen the storage areas near the existing Jadco Chemical Building. 6. Section 18.102 (Visual Clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right-of-ways. No site improvements are proposed at the intersection of the access driveways to the site which would interfere with a motorist's vision entering, or exiting the site. 7. Section 18.106 (Parking). The applicant has indicated that 9,152 square feet is to be developed for warehouse use which requires one space per each 1,000 square feet or portion thereof or 9.15 spaces. The applicant has proposed 5,622 square feet of office space which requires one space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area or 28.11 parking spaces. The applicant also indicates that the existing Jadco Use is developed with 1,000 square feet of office and 7,000 square feet of warehouse space which is based on the same parking ratio requirements, requires a total of 12 parking spaces. Based on these uses a minimum of 50 parking spaces is required. The applicant has provided 53 parking spaces which exceeds the minimum requirements. A total of 31 parking spaces are proposed to be located on areas which is Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. A portion of this area is currently used by the Jadco Chemical Building for parking. The applicant shall provide a copy of an agreement with Burlington Northern for the use of the Railroad right-of-way for parking. If the right-of-way area is later needed for railroad use the applicant shall develop an alternative location(s) for the required off-street parking. A maximum of 40% of the required parking spaces can be developed as compact spaces. Because a minimum 50 spaces are required, up to 20 parking spaces can be developed as compact spaces. The applicant has proposed to develop a total of 18 spaces as compact which is less than the maximum allowed for this site. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 7 8. Section 18.106 (Bicycle Facilities) requires one bicycle parking space for each new classroom. The site plan provides three bicycle racks. Based on the floor plan which was provided, a minimum of 50 parking spaces are required which requires a minimum of three bicycle parking spaces. The site plan, as proposed, meets this requirement. 9. Section 18.108 (Pedestrian Circulation) requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the ground floor entrances from commercial, industrial and institutional development to the streets which provide pedestrian access and egress. A walkway system has been provided from the proposed building entrances to the SW 74th Avenue frontage. 10. Section 18.108 (Access) requires that a minimum of a 30 foot accessway with a minimum of 24 feet paved shall be provided to serve a development which requires up to 99 parking spaces. A total of five driveways have been proposed some of which are existing. The Conditions of Approval recommend consolidation of these driveways to a maximum of one driveway on each side of the street. The driveways should be aligned to directly oppose each other in order to avoid turning movement conflicts. The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). Became effective on January 26, 1992. The act requires two disabled person parking spaces if from 25 to 50 parking spaces are required. The applicant has provided two handicapped parking spaces near the entrance of the proposed building, but none near the entrance of the existing Jadco Chemical Building. It is recommended that, if possible, a minimum of one parking space be relocated near the main entrance of the Jadco Building. It is suggested that the parking space be relocated in such a manner so that handicapped persons using the space are not required to cross a driveway aisle to access the main entrance. 11. Section 18.114 (Signage) states that one freestanding sign up to 70 square feet per face may be permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Wall signs are limited to fifteen percent of each building elevation. No signs have been proposed as a part of this application. Therefore, sign permits must be obtained prior to the installation of any sign. 12. Section 18.116 (Waste and Recycling Enclosures) provides a range of methods of compliance with trash and recycling enclosure design requirements. The applicant has provided a trash and recycling enclosure which appears to meet the minimum size standards set forth within this section. Due to potential ongoing problems with site servicing, it is recommended that the applicant obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed enclosure location and design. The enclosure shall also be provided with a six foot tall solid screen around the enclosure. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 8 13. Section 18.1:.)-r (Variance) provides review criteria for Qtiproval of a variance to a development standard. The applicant had requested a variance to the 35 foot front-yard setback of the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Because the property is a corner lot with frontages in excess of 75 feet on each adjoining street, the applicant may determine which frontage is to be the front yard setback area. The applicant has proposed to designate SW Durham Road as the front yard setback. The existing Jadco Building meets the 35 foot setback from SW Durham Road. As a corner sideyard, the applicant is also required to comply with a 20 foot setback from SW 74th Avenue. The new structure is presently proposed to be developed at a dimension of approximately 15 to 22 feet from SW 74th Avenue. The applicant has withdrawn the variance request and agreed to a recommended condition of approval that the site plan be revised to develop the building at a minimum of 20 feet from SW 74th Avenue. 14. Section 18.164 (Streets and Utilities) contains development standards for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a Minor Collector street to have a minimum 60 feet of right-of-way, a 40 feet minimum roadway width, and 2-3 moving lanes. c. Section 18.164.070(A) requires sidewalks adjoining both sides of a major col lector streets. d. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. e. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site below. Conditions of Approval have been recommended concerning the required street and utility improvements. IV. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS FINDINGS: . STREETS: Access to the site is along SW 74th Avenue, a local commercial street requiring 50 feet right-of-way width, 34 feet paved width and five foot wide sidewalks. Portions of the site are fully improved with curb and sidewalk: the remaining portion is improved with curb only. The plans show the sidewalk will be completed. HEARLNG'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN LNDUSTR1AL BUILDING PAGE 9 The submitted site plan shows that the street has an existing paved width of 26.5 feet. The east side of the street fronts along railroad property and is improved only with ditch and culverts within 20 feet from the centerline right-of-way. This side of the street should be improved with curbs and an inlet at the existing culvert. The railroad parcel provides the applicant with paved parking spaces: construction of additional parking spaces is proposed. The widths of the proposed driveways for this parking exceed the maximum width of 30 feet permitted by City standards. The site plan shows a four foot-wide, painted pedestrian crossing across SW 74th Avenue from the site to the parking area within the railroad property. Since no other traffic control devices are proposed, the crossing should not be permitted. 2. SANITARY SEWER: Service is proposed from an existing 60 inch sanitary interceptor manhole within the floodplain and wetlands along the west of the project area. The connection will require a permit from the Unified Sewerage Agency and is expected to require a water tight inside drop connection. 3. STORM SEWER: The parking area within the railroad property drains to an existing ditch along the side of the street. The site is drained by a private storm drainage system that outfalls to an existing pond that will be used as a treatment facility. The facilities plans shows that the existing pond will be converted to a treatment facility by installing an outlet device. Additional treatment will be provided by an undisturbed corridor upland of an existing wetlands surrounding the pond. The portion of the site below an elevation of 130 feet is inundated by the 100-year flood. Although the floodplain is not shown on the site map, it closely follows the lower edge of the proposed parking lot. V. CIT & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The Water Department reviewed this application and provided the following comment: (a) The D.D.C. for the fireline may be located inside the building if the device is located on an outside wall. However, since the floor plan shows a fire sprinkler rcom in the interior of the building, the D.D.C. will need to be located in a vault at the property line (street right-of-way). HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 10 2. The Police L_oartment reviewed this application provided the following comments: (a) The parking lot lighting is inadequate as is proposed. Particularly on the west side of the parking lot where there is none. There is a light pole indicated to be placed at a curb line of the parking lot just south of the screened dumpster but will be interfered with as the Douglas Fir tree matures next to the pole. (b) I see no proposed pole lighting for the parking lot across the street on the east side of SW 74th Avenue. (c) There are two wall pack lighting fixtures proposed over the two overhead doors on the south side but no mention as to the proposed wattage. (d) The entire ground floor area of Office Area #1 facing out towards the wetland area of Fanno Creek needs lighting as well. (e) The proposed landscaping looks acceptable. 3. GTE reviewed this application and provided the following comment: (a) The developer to place conduit/conduits to GTE specifications. 4. The Oregon Department of Transportation reviewed this application and provided the following comments: (a) The site is located adjacent to Durham Road (Beaverton - Tualatin Highway) and SW 74th Avenue. The Oregon Transportation Plan 1991, designates this portion of SW Durham Road a district highway which provides for efficient and safe medium speed, and medium to high volume traffic movements on innercity, intracity and intercommunity routes. (b) The proposed development, an industrial office and warehouse facility, has the potential to generate sufficient traffic to negatively impact the functioning of SW Durham Road. Therefore, we are recommending a traffic impact analysis be performed. Specifically, impacts to the intersection of Durham Road and SW 74th Avenue should be analyzed. Trip generation projections for nearby Durham Elementary School, which recently submitted an application for an expansion that would double its student enrollment, should be included in the scenario. The City has not recommended a traffic study due to the limited expected traffic impacts of this development. 5. The South Citizen Involvement Team was notified of the proposed development. No comments or objections to this development were received. In addition, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting regarding this request. HE. RLNG'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 11 No other comments were received by the Planning Division. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the Site Development Review and Sensitive Lands requests for this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious, to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Site Development Review (SDR) 95-0014/Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) 95-0010 subject to the conditions which follow: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: Recommendations: 1. The applicant shall submit written authorization from Burlington Northern Railroad to construct the proposed parking on its property. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 2. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the western S.W. 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall complete construction of the sidewalk along the entire west frontage of SW 74th Street and install a curb along the leased portion of the east frontage to City standards. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 4. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings, and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements). STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDI,NG PAGE 12 5. The applicant shall pay the Water Quantity fee as establisned by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 6. The site plan shall be revised to eliminate intended street crossing, revise the width of proposed driveways to the parking on the east side of S.W. 74th Avenue to conform to City standards and show the 100-year floodplain. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 7. The applicant shall submit an approved permit from the Unified Sewerage Agency for the connection to the existing sanitary sewer. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 8. Detailed construction plans and calculations, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for the water quality facility in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution Order No. 91-47. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 9. The applicant shall submit revised site and landscaping plans or obtain approval of the following: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. a. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers. b. The site plan is required to be revised to provide a minimum of one (1) additional handicapped accessible parking space. c. The applicant shall obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed location. d. The applicant shall enter into an agreement or contract which states that the applicant will grant a 15 foot access easement to the City for the purposes of providing a pedestrian/bicycle pathway. This easement shall be located within the floodpiain area. The agreement shall be valid for a period of 12 months while the City undertakes a study to determine the preferred location of the pathway along this section of Fanno Creek. e. The applicant shall submit security lighting plans meeting the specifications of the Police Department. f. The applicant shall provide a plan to screen the storage areas near the existing Jadco Chemical Building. g. The applicant shall provide a copy of an agreement with Burlington Northern for the use of the Railroad right-of-way for parking. If the right-of-way area is later needed for railroad use the applicant shall develop alternative location(s) for the required off-street parking. h. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the approved revised site and landscape plan. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 13 IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1. SECTION 18.160.170 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period, within which, all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. 8. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid, and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages, and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. 2. SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: 1. Require a bond in an amount not grater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. B. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 3. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. SITE DEVELOPMENT AND SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPROVALS ARE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIV : ' OF THIS DECISION. J/; G 1 G j _z 11/20/95 Prepared By: ark Roberts Date Assoc*, Planners` r c� 11/20/95 Approved By: Dick Bewersdorff < Date Senior Planner HEARLNG'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 14 FIND�_ .aS - ROUGH PROPORTIONI,..ITY The following provides findings for the determination of the rough proportionality of a requirement for a pedestrian easement on sensitive land adjacent to the development of a 13.970 square foot industrial building at 16055 SW 74th Avenue (SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010/Duncan Industrial Building). A pedestrian way is shown on the City Comprehensive Plan Park Plan to follow Fanno Creek. Fanno Creek flows through the property to be developed under the above Site Development Review. Providing a pedestrian way will provide the potential linkage of this and adjacent properties to the partially constructed existing pedestrian system along Fanno Creek. The proposed industrial building will generate additional vehicle trips on the City's street system. The added trips will take up capacity on the City street system which must be accommodated by infrastructure improvements. Unmitigated Impact According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a project's impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68 percent unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June, 1995): According to the TIF Ordinance a Light Industrial Use has a traffic trip generation factor of 6.97 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the applicant has proposed to develop 13.970 square feet of light industrial space this new use would be expected to generate 97.37 vehicle trips per day. The industrial per trip TIF assessment is $153.00 according to the Washington County TIF ordinance. Using the above, the unmitigated impact of the Duncan Industrial Property is as follows: Full Impact 97.37 x $465.12 = $ 45,288 Less TIF Assessment 97.37 x $153.00 = $ 14.898 Unmitigated Impact $ 30,390 Value of pedestrian mitigation The value of the mitigation of a pedestrian path can also be determined. In this case, it should be noted that only an easement is being required with the City having to construct the pathway at a later time. According to the LUTRAQ study (The Pedestrian Environment December, 1993), increasing pedestrian trips reduces auto trips. LUTRAQ shows a Pedestrian Environmental Factor (PEF) for the Durham/74th area of four to six. According to LUTRAQ, 94 percent of all trips are by auto in such an area. Increasing pedestrian trips by a pathway would increase the PEF. LUTRAQ also indicates that construction of a pedestrian friendly environment will result in system wide improvements of 10 percent. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 15 Conservatively, the reduction of reliance on the auto in the area of this development could range from six to eight percent. This yields a mitigation value as follows: 97.37 trips x .06 x $465.12= $2,717 to 97.37 trips x .08 x $465.12 = $3,623 These figures would reduce the unmitigated impact to $27,673 or $26,766 depending on the use of 6 or 8 percent. Estimated property value The value of the land needed for a 15 foot wide easement for a pedestrian path potentially located on both sides of Fanno Creek is approximately $9,641. This is determined by a maximum need for an approximate 700 foot long trail multiplied by 15 feet in width which equals 10,500 square feet on either side of the creek. According to the City of Tigard Park and Recreation Facilities System Development Charge Study (Draggo, Nov., 1994), the value of an acre of Sensitive Land is $20,000 per acre. The square footage of the easement needed for a pathway is just over one- half acre. The value of just over one-half acre and would therefore have a value of$9,641. Conclusion The unmitigated impact of the 13,970 square foot light industrial building is roughly $27,673 to $26,766 compared to an estimated value of the easement of $9,641 indicates that the unmitigated impact is much greater than the value of the easement. Therefore, the requirement of an easement for a pathway more than meets the rough proportionality test. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 16 sjisil i 1 ) -,,,. ',.. 1.\, /\" ir ) / . 9. ,,,\ ,....„,(Ti ( / , m , Ili i iiiii , . i s t!D _ •i•S• ... _ 'V ii iillits( :—. ..-, , „/"'"Ei •„..,\•,• /\ ..,IN :. t 1 1, . -:;_-,- .:.:.:.: 0 4.7 lt, , 1 II is : 4 . ' .a::..........p.:.:::.:.:::.:...... ii n [� 1 r. 1. -fi. .. �.r--1`_ Sw�4rh,q�`�'�'"��,..,�"_ }; _ . ._ .I.\. • ". ,..,,,,... 12,,....-eliesavisollis• '-------------______:- ._..........i I ■ cn< cn i III .I i u -�� _ e - �rD CxJ7 ft _ _ 11Ug�- -r �' 1 I - 7 oC G 1; I I? I /` \ \ lT 0 o Z _ . Y O co "► O --- 1 euRL WGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD '- -.I •• • ti i I. I CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. . I -1 1 1 / , -----A C 11 - 11 'i 1 -1 . T- 1 1 1 1 I hi — ■ v- S 8 1 40000"1011111 ."1001101111. 1 0) C 1 4<rr 4 p C CZ 61,1,,, 40 o -44i,,,o4w, L dc''' 1.• H �ti '17 CC3 _______L :i..., -P° (....) Vicinity Map CASE: SDR95-0014 , VAR95-0009 SLR 95-0010 Note: Map is not to scale N Duncan Industrial Building CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER NOVEMBER 27, 1995 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0010/VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 >DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING< The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a 13,970 square foot industrial building and Sensitive Lands Review to perform land form alterations within the 100-Year Floodplain, 100-Year Floodway and Wetlands areas to connect to an existing sanitary sewer line in Fanno Creek. The Applicant has withdrawn his application for a Variance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). ZONING DESIGNATION: Planned Industrial (I-P). LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AB, tax lot 800). APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.68, 18.84, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.134, 18.160 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 11/27/95 PUBLIC HEARING h:l login\patty\masters\agendho.mst p CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER w� ►, NOVEMBER 27, 1995 - 7:00 P.M. CITY 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD OREGON TIGARD EGON TIGARD, OR 97223 -------_� anyone wishing to speak on an ii■ a ends item should sin on the 9 9 appropriate sign-in sheet(s). PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Planning Commission meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639- 4171 , Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ❖ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ❖ Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2 11/27/95 PUBLIC HEARING h:\login\patty\masters\agendho.mst (------ February 12 1997 AA, ry CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering 9025 SW Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Proposed tenant improvement plan for 15995 SW 74th Avenue Dear Jim: This letter is in follow up to your letters concerning the proposed NW Auction use. The Director has determined that a portion of this use is considered a Retail Sales Use but that the majority of the proposed tenant improvements are permitted outright within the I-P Zoning District. Specifically, the Director has interpreted that the warehouse and office square lease areas are not counted against the 20% limitation that applies to the General Retail Sales tenant improvements. The recent Site Development Review plan stated that the existing Jadco Building was a total of 8,000 square feet of which 7,000 had been developed as warehouse and 1,000 square feet as office space. The new building of 14,774 square feet was proposed to be developed for 5,622 square feet of office, and 9,152 square feet of warehouse. NW Auctions proposes to occupy 9,848 square feet of the new building for use as an auction house. The tenant improvement plans provided 2,335 square feet of office, 1,850 square feet of warehouse, and 3,150 square feet for auction staging. An additional 2,513 square feet has been designated for the actual auction. The Director has determined this portion of the proposed tenant improvements to be a General Retail Sales use. The Planned Industrial Zoning District permits up to 20% of a "Development Complex" to be developed as a General Retail Sales use. This means that 20% of the building square footage on the site can be used for retail sales. Based on the recent Site Development Review, the site is developed with a total of 22,774 square feet. The total square footage for the retail portion of the auction use and any other retail uses cannot exceed 4,558 square feet. Page 1 of 2 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 As I mentioned to John Duncan, because of the additional research involved in making a Director's Interpretation, an additional fee of $50 is due upon issuance of the proposed tenant improvement plans. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, P/1 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP c: Jim Hendryx John Duncan Dick Bewersdorff Bonnie Mulhearn SDR 95-0014 Land Use file 1997 Director's Interpretations file is curpin/mark_r/duncan3.doc Page 2 of 2 Name of applicant Larry Abell Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 1S 136uD 00001 Address or General Location West of 11535 SW 67th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE Larry Abe 1 1 , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed Building affecting the land located at West of 11535 SW 67th Ave. , and did on the 21st day of March , 19 95 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Development application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at Located on the Nil radius facing intersection of Haines & SW 68th (state location on property) This 21st day of March , 19 95 Signa ure Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this 221Y-a-9 day of /,linnet, , 19 yS Jl�r�i�fJr�r!✓. •l ,1 iag5Zt OFFICIAL SEA! R'rr elt plPilfi K?); 1,1 Notary Public for the State of Oregon CG^iNiiA8 P,O.039046 My Commission Expires: (C c -'}S" MY COMMr CPt EXP!RES DEL , t‘ WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 login\jo\postnot.cit PUBLIC HEARING' NOTICE _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1995 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, *in 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 , WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: CITY OF TIGARD FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0010 FILE TITLE: DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING APPLICANT: John Duncan OWNER: Same 16055 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 684-0044 REQUEST: > A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square foot one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. The applicant has applied for a variance to the required 20 foot front yard setback. The applicant has also proposed land form alterations within the 100-year floodplain to connect to an existing sewer line in Fanno Creek. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, CRITERIA: 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial uses within an Industrial Park setting. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND �3DR 95-0014NAR 95-0009/SLR 95-0010 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 11/27/95 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL =ORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUB' '-TEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSt.,.4 SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPO. . . TO THE APPLICATION AFTER NOVEMBER 6, 1995 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. tJll 1IIIIiIIf`7 ' ' ` I \--"-----' III 1 '�� .. I . N Ns InAll ) .. , ;NIIIW bill ---1 . ,Nalum 1 IHI H I H I i l l W JQ v t.o-4 ) I 11111111M1i- 1 A: T : I „ tio d Rd I PQ ri. a I IdG,o H- `• d SDP 95-0014/VAR 95-0009/SLR 95-0010 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 11/27/95 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AGENDA 2.1 HEARING DATE: 11/27/95 7:00 PM BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by John STAFF REPORT Duncan to develop a 13, 970 SDR 95-0014 square foot industrial building. SLR 95-0010 VAR 95-0009 I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Duncan Industrial Building SUMMARY: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a 13,970 square foot industrial building and Sensitive Lands Review to perform landform alterations within the 100-Year Floodplain, 100-Year Floodway and Wetlands areas to connect to an existing sanitary sewer line in Fanno Creek. The Applicant has withdrawn his application for a Variance. APPLICANT: John Duncan OWNERS: Same 16055 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L) ZONING DESIGNATION: Planned Industrial (I-P) LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 13AB, tax lot 800) APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.68, 18.84, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.134, 18.160 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ;= Approval Subject to Conditions HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 1 II, FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Background Information: The site is bisected by Fanno Creek. Much of the site is within the 100-Year Flood Plain or contains wetlands. The site is also developed with an existing industrial building, outdoor storage and parking lot uses located towards the corner of SW 74th Avenue and SW Durham Road. B. Site Size and Shape: The gross property acreage is 6.64 acres and roughly rectangular in shape with dimensions of 352 feet along SW Durham Road and 642 feet of length along SW Durham Road. C. Existing Uses and Structures: A portion of the property south of the proposed development site has an existing industrial building with outdoor storage areas. The majority of the site is undeveloped at this time. D. Surrounding Land Uses: The properties immediately to the north, east and south of the site are zoned Planned Industrial (I-P). To the north and east are properties which are developed with light industrial uses. To the west are areas zoned for residential use. To the south and west of the property are areas which are developed with single-family residential uses. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS A. Community Development Code: 1. Section 18.68 (Planned Industrial Zoning District) allows a range of light industrial uses developed within an Industrial Park setting. The applicant has proposed office and warehouse uses which are among those uses permitted within a light industrial park setting. A maximum height of 45 feet is permitted for habitable structures. Based on the limited topographic change around the proposed structure, the building would not exceed a height of 34 feet which complies with the building height limitations. Section 18.68 specifies that the minimum landscaping requirement shall be 25 percent. The site plan indicates that the total site area is 6.64 acres. The areas to be maintained as wetlands or within the 100-Year Floodplain are not specifically HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 2 identified by acreage amounts, however, the application does include the acreage to be developed and the percentages of each development site to be landscaped. The applicant states that 15% of the portion of the site is to be developed with the new industrial building. A large portion of the 6.64 acres is within Wetlands, 100- Year Floodplain and Floodway Areas which are not expected to be developed in the future. For this reason, the percentage of landscape of the overall site will continue to be in excess of the 25% minimum landscape standard. The applicant indicates that a minimum of 40% of the excess railroad right-of-way to be developed as a parking lot is to be landscaped. Overall, the applicant has provided a minimum of twelve parking lot trees for the 53 parking spaces which is in excess of the one tree for each seven parking ratio requirement. Areas which are not planted with street trees are proposed to be planted with lawn or shrubs in compliance with the applicable landscape standards. 2. Chapter 18.84.040(A) states that the Hearings Officer shall approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: (a) Landform alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any narrowing of the floodway boundary. This project shall preserve the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway as this project proposes to add no net fill. The sewage connection will, therefore, not impede water flow or increase volume within the floodplain. No development is allowed in residential floodplains in order to retain storage capacity for the 100-year flood and to not impede flow. (b) Landform alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The subject project is in area designated as Industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, therefore, this type of landform alteration is permissible. (c) Where a landform alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. This land form alteration will not result in any increase in the surface elevation of the 100-year flood as discussed previously. As indicated in (#1) above, floodplains are restricted from development in order to retain 100-year flood capacity. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 3 (d) The landform alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely. The Tigard Park Plan indicates that the floodplain area within this parcel is part of the proposed pedestrian pathway system. However, staff does not know the location of the pathway, and will not, until a future study determines the preferred location. It should also be noted that neither of the adjoining properties currently contains a pathway which would allow a connection to the pathway system. Staff, therefore, concludes that construction of a pathway is not timely and recommends that the applicant only be required to provide a 15 foot access easement to allow the City to construct a pathway in the future. Such requirements must be roughly proportional to the impact of the use. In this case the estimated value of an easement of sensitive lands is $9,641. This compares to an unmitigated impact of the development on the transportation system ranging conservatively from $27,673 - $26,766 according to the Larson methodology utilized in the Dolan finding (calculations indicated on the two (2) page FINDINGS - ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY exhibit attached.) Prior to obtaining building permits, it is recommended that the applicant sign an agreement or contract which states that the applicant will grant a 15 foot access easement to the City for the purposes of providing a pedestrian/bicycle pathway. This easement shall be located within the floodplain area. The agreement shall be valid for a period of 12 months, while the City undertakes a study to determine the preferred location of the pathway along this section of Fanno Creek. (e) The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. This criteria is not applicable as a pathway will not be constructed in conjunction with this application. Further, a sensitive lands review will be required for the actual construction of the path and will be reviewed for compliance with this section. (f) The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers. (g) Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 4 sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. The applicant has been conditioned to provide a 15 foot access easement which is sufficient to provide for a pedestrian pathway in accordance with the pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. While staff recognizes that residential development within the floodplain is not permitted and the property within the floodplain will, therefore, remain undeveloped. The City would welcome the voluntary dedication of the floodplain area by the applicant. Such a dedication would leave the City with the responsibility of flood control maintenance, as well as maintaining this area in its natural state. Otherwise, the applicant shall provide deed restrictions which restrict use of this floodplain area, provides maintenance of the floodplain storage capacity and maintains the area in its natural state. 3. Chapter 18.84.040(D) states that the Director shall approve or approve with conditions an application request for sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: (a) The proposed landform alteration or development is neither on wetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within 25 feet of such a wetland. The proposed storm line will be within a wetland area but it is not designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map, nor is it within 25 feet of such a wetland. (b) The extent and nature of the proposed landform alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use. The disturbance is the minimum disturbance necessary to accommodate the connection to a existing 60" sanitary sewer line in Fanno Creek. (c) Any encroachment or change in on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated. This project does not propose to change on-site or off-site drainage. (d) Where natural vegetation has been removed due to landform alteration or development, erosion control provisions of the Surface Water Management program of Washington County must be met and areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted in like or similar species in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. The minimal amount of vegetation loss expected with construction will be re- vegetated. Erosion control measures shall be as conditioned by the approved Division of State Lands permit or site work permits. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 5 (e) Al! other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met. • Other sensitive lands requirements have been met as addressed in this report. (f) The provisions of Chapter 18.150, Tree Removal, shall be met. No tree removal has been proposed. (g) Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natural Areas, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies are satisfied as discussed below. Policy 2.1.1 provides the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development review process. The sensitive lands request is consistent with Policy 2.1.1 because notice of the application and the public hearing on this item was provided to owners of property in the vicinity of the site. Policy 3.1.1 provides that the City shall not allow development in areas meeting The definition of wetlands under chapter 18.26 or areas having slopes in excess of 25% except where it can be shown that established and proven engineering techniques related to a specific site plan will make the area suitable for the proposed development. (Note: This policy does not apply to lands designated as significant wetlands on the floodplain and wetlands map.) Policy 3.1.1 is satisfied because engineering techniques will provide a connection to the existing sanitary sewer in Fanno Creek and the applicable approval criteria for development in wetland areas have been satisfied. Policy 3.2.1 provides that the City will prohibit any development within the 100-year floodplain that would result in any rise in elevation of the 100-year floodplain. Policy 3.2.1 is satisfied because this proposal will not result in any rise in the elevation of the 100-year floodplain. Policy 3.2.2 provides that the City shall prohibit development in the floodway, except if the alteration preserves or enhances the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. Policy 3.2.2 is satisfied because this development will preserve the function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway. 4. Section 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) provides standards for landscaping and screening for between uses of varying intensity. On three sides of the property the portion of the site to be developed is adjoined by areas zoned for industrial use so the buffer setback does not apply to these areas. To the west the site is adjoined by residential areas, however, the Fanno Creek provides a buffer between these areas and the proposed industrial use. The applicant has not proposed to orient service or loading areas towards residential areas to the west of HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 6 the site. Also, none of the proposed development is Moser than 220 feet to the westerly edge of the parking lot. Because the proposed site improvements do not adjoin the property line no land use screening and buffering is required to screen the new uses from residential areas to the west of the site. Section 18.100.030 requires street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires narrow street trees (under 25 feet tall) to be spaced, no greater than, 20 feet apart. The applicant's plans show sixteen (16) chanticleer flowering pear trees to be spaced twenty (20) feet apart on the center, thereby, meeting the tree requirements. 5. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4)(b) requires screening of storage areas as viewed from all directions regardless of the adjoining land uses. Currently the property owner stores barrels related to the existing use. It is recommended that the applicant provide a plan to screen the storage areas near the existing Jadco Chemical Building. 6. Section 18.102 (Visual Clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right-of-ways. No site improvements are proposed at the intersection of the access driveways to the site which would interfere with a motorist's vision entering, or exiting the site. 7. Section 18.106 (Parking). The applicant has indicated that 9,152 square feet is to be developed for warehouse use which requires one space per each 1,000 square feet or portion thereof or 9.15 spaces. The applicant has proposed 5,622 square feet of office space which requires one space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area or 28.11 parking spaces. The applicant also indicates that the existing Jadco Use is developed with 1,000 square feet of office and 7,000 square feet of warehouse space which is based on the same parking ratio requirements, requires a total of 12 parking spaces. Based on these uses a minimum of 50 parking spaces is required. The applicant has provided 53 parking spaces which exceeds the minimum requirements. A total of 31 parking spaces are proposed to be located on areas which is Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. A portion of this area is currently used by the Jadco Chemical Building for parking. The applicant shall provide a copy of an agreement with Burlington Northern for the use of the Railroad right-of-way for parking. If the right-of-way area is later needed for railroad use the applicant shall develop an alternative location(s) for the required off-street parking. A maximum of 40% of the required parking spaces can be developed as compact spaces. Because a minimum 50 spaces are required, up to 20 parking spaces can be developed as compact spaces. The applicant has proposed to develop a total of 18 spaces as compact which is less than the maximum allowed for this site. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 7 8. Section 18.106 (Bicycle Facilities) requires one bicycle parking space for each new classroom. The site plan provides three bicycle racks. Based on the floor plan which was provided, a minimum of 50 parking spaces are required which requires a minimum of three bicycle parking spaces. The site plan, as proposed, meets this requirement. 9. Section 18.108 (Pedestrian Circulation) requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the ground floor entrances from commercial, industrial and institutional development to the streets which provide pedestrian access and egress. A walkway system has been provided from the proposed building entrances to the SW 74th Avenue frontage. 10. Section 18.108 (Access) requires that a minimum of a 30 foot accessway with a minimum of 24 feet paved shall be provided to serve a development which requires up to 99 parking spaces. A total of five driveways have been proposed some of which are existing. The Conditions of Approval recommend consolidation of these driveways to a maximum of one driveway on each side of the street. The driveways should be aligned to directly oppose each other in order to avoid turning movement conflicts. The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). Became effective on January 26, 1992. The act requires two disabled person parking spaces if from 25 to 50 parking spaces are required. The applicant has provided two handicapped parking spaces near the entrance of the proposed building, but none near the entrance of the existing Jadco Chemical Building. It is recommended that, if possible, a minimum of one parking space be relocated near the main entrance of the Jadco Building. It is suggested that the parking space be relocated in such a manner so that handicapped persons using the space are not required to cross a driveway aisle to access the main entrance. 11. Section 18.114 (Signage) states that one freestanding sign up to 70 square feet per face may be permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Wall signs are limited to fifteen percent of each building elevation. No signs have been proposed as a part of this application. Therefore, sign permits must be obtained prior to the installation of any sign. 12. Section 18.116 (Waste and Recycling Enclosures) provides a range of methods of compliance with trash and recycling enclosure design requirements. The applicant has provided a trash and recycling enclosure which appears to meet the minimum size standards set forth within this section. Due to potential ongoing problems with site servicing, it is recommended that the applicant obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed enclosure location and design. The enclosure shall also be provided with a six foot tall solid screen around the enclosure. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 8 13. Section 18.134 (Variance) provides review criteria for approval of a variance to a development standard. The applicant had requested a variance to the 35 foot front-yard setback of the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Because the property is a corner lot with frontages in excess of 75 feet on each adjoining street, the applicant may determine which frontage is to be the front yard setback area. The applicant has proposed to designate SW Durham Road as the front yard setback. The existing Jadco Building meets the 35 foot setback from SW Durham Road. As a corner sideyard, the applicant is also required to comply with a 20 foot setback from SW 74th Avenue. The new structure is presently proposed to be developed at a dimension of approximately 15 to 22 feet from SW 74th Avenue. The applicant has withdrawn the variance request and agreed to a recommended condition of approval that the site plan be revised to develop the building at a minimum of 20 feet from SW 74th Avenue. 14. Section 18.164 (Streets and Utilities) contains development standards for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a Minor Collector street to have a minimum 60 feet of right-of-way, a 40 feet minimum roadway width, and 2-3 moving lanes. c. Section 18.164.070(A) requires sidewalks adjoining both sides of a major collector streets. d. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. e. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site below. Conditions of Approval have been recommended concerning the required street and utility improvements. IV. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS FINDINGS: 1. STREETS: Access to the site is along SW 74th Avenue, a local commercial street requiring 50 feet right-of-way width, 34 feet paved width and five foot wide sidewalks. Portions of the site are fully improved with curb and sidewalk; the remaining portion is improved with curb only. The plans show the sidewalk will be completed. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 9 The submitted site plan shows that the street has an existing paved width of 26.5 feet. The east side of the street fronts along railroad property and is improved only with ditch and culverts within 20 feet from the centerline right-of-way. This side of the street should be improved with curbs and an inlet at the existing culvert. The railroad parcel provides the applicant with paved parking spaces; construction of additional parking spaces is proposed. The widths of the proposed driveways for this parking exceed the maximum width of 30 feet permitted by City standards. The site plan shows a four foot-wide, painted pedestrian crossing across SW 74th Avenue from the site to the parking area within the railroad property. Since no other traffic control devices are proposed, the crossing should not be permitted. 2. SANITARY SEWER: Service is proposed from an existing 60 inch sanitary interceptor manhole within the floodplain and wetlands along the west of the project area. The connection will require a permit from the Unified Sewerage Agency and is expected to require a water tight inside drop connection. 3. STORM SEWER: The parking area within the railroad property drains to an existing ditch along the side of the street. The site is drained by a private storm drainage system that outfalls to an existing pond that will be used as a treatment facility. The facilities plans shows that the existing pond will be converted to a treatment facility by installing an outlet device. Additional treatment will be provided by an undisturbed corridor upland of an existing wetlands surrounding the pond. The portion of the site below an elevation of 130 feet is inundated by the 100-year flood. Although the floodplain is not shown on the site map, it closely follows the lower edge of the proposed parking lot. V. CIT & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The Water Department reviewed this application and provided the following comment: (a) The D.D.C. for the fireline may be located inside the building if the device is located on an outside wall. However, since the floor plan shows a fire sprinkler room in the interior of the building, the D.D.C. will need to be located in a vault at the property line (street right-of-way). HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 10 2. The Police Department reviewed this application and provided the following comments: (a) The parking lot lighting is inadequate as is proposed. Particularly on the west side of the parking lot where there is none. There is a light pole indicated to be placed at a curb line of the parking lot just south of the screened dumpster but will be interfered with as the Douglas Fir tree matures next to the pole. (b) I see no proposed pole lighting for the parking lot across the street on the east side of SW 74th Avenue. (c) There are two wall pack lighting fixtures proposed over the two overhead doors on the south side but no mention as to the proposed wattage. (d) The entire ground floor area of Office Area #1 facing out towards the wetland area of Fanno Creek needs lighting as well. (e) The proposed landscaping looks acceptable. 3. GTE reviewed this application and provided the following comment: (a) The developer to place conduit/conduits to GTE specifications. 4. The Oregon Department of Transportation reviewed this application and provided the following comments: (a) The site is located adjacent to Durham Road (Beaverton - Tualatin Highway) and SW 74th Avenue. The Oregon Transportation Plan 1991, designates this portion of SW Durham Road a district highway which provides for efficient and safe medium speed, and medium to high volume traffic movements on innercity, intracity and intercommunity routes. (b) The proposed development, an industrial office and warehouse facility, has the potential to generate sufficient traffic to negatively impact the functioning of SW Durham Road. Therefore, we are recommending a traffic impact analysis be performed. Specifically, impacts to the intersection of Durham Road and SW 74th Avenue should be analyzed. Trip generation projections for nearby Durham Elementary School, which recently submitted an application for an expansion that would double its student enrollment, should be included in the scenario. The City has not recommended a traffic study due to the limited expected traffic impacts of this development: 5. The South Citizen Involvement Team was notified of the proposed development. No comments or objections to this development were received. In addition, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting regarding this request. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 11 No other comments were received by the Planning Division. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the Site Development Review and Sensitive Lands requests for this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious, to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Site Development Review (SDR) 95-0014/Sensitive Lands Review (SLR) 95-0010 subject to the conditions which follow: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: Recommendations: 1. The applicant shall submit written authorization from Burlington Northern Railroad to construct the proposed parking on its property. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 2. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the western S.W. 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall complete construction of the sidewalk along the entire west frontage of SW 74th Street and install a curb along the leased portion of the east frontage to City standards. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 4. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings, and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements). STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010-DUNCAN I,NDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 12 5. The applicant shall pay the Water Quantity fee as established by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 6. The site plan shall be revised to eliminate intended street crossing, revise the width of proposed driveways to the parking on the east side of S.W. 74th Avenue to conform to City standards and show the 100-year floodplain. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 7 The applicant shall submit an approved permit from the Unified Sewerage Agency for the connection to the existing sanitary sewer. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 8. Detailed construction plans and calculations, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for the water quality facility in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution Order No. 91-47. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 9. The applicant shall submit revised site and landscaping plans or obtain approval of the following: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. a. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers. b. The site plan is required to be revised to provide a minimum of one (1) additional handicapped accessible parking space. c. The applicant shall obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed location. d. The applicant shall enter into an agreement or contract which states that the applicant will grant a 15 foot access easement to the City for the purposes of providing a pedestrian/bicycle pathway. This easement shall be located within the floodplain area. The agreement shall be valid for a period of 12 months while the City undertakes a study to determine the preferred location of the pathway along this section of Fanno Creek. e. The applicant shall submit security lighting plans meeting the specifications of the Police Department. f. The applicant shall provide a plan to screen the storage areas near the existing Jadco Chemical Building. g. The applicant shall provide a copy of an agreement with Burlington Northern for the use of the Railroad right-of-way for parking. If the right-of-way area is later needed for railroad use the applicant shall develop alternative location(s) for the required off-street parking. h. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the approved revised site and landscape plan. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 13 IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1. SECTION 18.160.170 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period, within which, all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. B. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid, and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages, and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. 2. SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: 1. Require a bond in an amount not grater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2. Approve and release such bonds. B. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 3. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. SITE DEVELOPMENT AND SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW APPROVALS ARE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVEZA7 OF THIS DECISION. �2 G' ('1� �/4• -._ 11/20/95 Prepared By: ark Roberts ` Date Assoc4tp Plann6F--"` n Y ( c� � .v'C�+- 11/20/95 Approved By: Dick Bewersdorff Date Senior Planner HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 14 FINDINGS - ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY • The following provides findings for the determination of the rough proportionality of a requirement for a pedestrian easement on sensitive land adjacent to the development of a 13,970 square foot industrial building at 16055 SW 74th Avenue (SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010/Duncan Industrial Building). A pedestrian way is shown on the City Comprehensive Plan Park Plan to follow Fanno Creek. Fanno Creek flows through the property to be developed under the above Site Development Review. Providing a pedestrian way will provide the potential linkage of this and adjacent properties to the partially constructed existing pedestrian system along Fanno Creek. The proposed industrial building will generate additional vehicle trips on the City's street system. The added trips will take up capacity on the City street system which must be accommodated by infrastructure improvements. Unmitigated Impact According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a project's impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68 percent unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June, 1995): According to the TIF Ordinance a Light Industrial Use has a traffic trip generation factor of 6.97 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the applicant has proposed to develop 13,970 square feet of light industrial space this new use would be expected to generate 97.37 vehicle trips per day. The industrial per trip TIF assessment is $153.00 according to the Washington County TIF ordinance. Using the above, the unmitigated impact of the Duncan Industrial Property is as follows: Full Impact 97.37 x $465.12 = $ 45,288 Less TIF Assessment 97.37 x $153.00 = $ 14,898 Unmitigated Impact $ 30,390 Value of pedestrian mitigation The value of the mitigation of a pedestrian path can also be determined. In this case, it should be noted that only an easement is being required with the City having to construct the pathway at a later time. According to the LUTRAQ study (The Pedestrian Environment December, 1993), increasing pedestrian trips reduces auto trips. LUTRAQ shows a Pedestrian Environmental Factor (PEF) for the Durham/74th area of four to six. According to LUTRAQ, 94 percent of all trips are by auto in such an area. Increasing pedestrian trips by a pathway would increase the PEF. LUTRAQ also indicates that construction of a pedestrian friendly environment will result in system wide improvements of 10 percent. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 15 Conservatively, the reduction of reliance on the auto in the area of this development could range from six to eight percent. This yields a mitigation value as follows: 97.37 trips x .06 x $465.12= $2,717 to 97.37 trips x .08 x $465.12 = $3,623 These figures would reduce the unmitigated impact to $27,673 or $26,766 depending on the use of 6 or 8 percent. Estimated property value The value of the and needed for a 15 foot wide easement for a pedestrian path potentially located on both sides of Fanno Creek is approximately $9,641. This is determined by a maximum need for an approximate 700 foot long trail multiplied by 15 feet in width which equals 10,500 square feet on either side of the creek. According to the City of Tigard Park and Recreation Facilities System Development Charge Study (Draggo, Nov., 1994), the value of an acre of Sensitive Land is $20,000 per acre. The square footage of the easement needed for a pathway is just over one- half acre. The value of just over one-half acre and would therefore have a value of$9,641. Conclusion The unmitigated impact of the 13,970 square foot light industrial building is roughly $27,673 to $26,766 compared to an estimated value of the easement of $9,641 indicates that the unmitigated impact is much greater than the value of the easement. Therefore, the requirement of an easement for a pathway more than meets the rough proportionality test. HEARING'S OFFICER SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010- DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 16 / 11 i �--- e,/�I �. ;.. 1-1 - • -.... __•-• ,i1.11 -::.... . 1 VI ...M,"J..a•v 1 w....•1. e.tcKt I. 1 .. ..�o.v }::,1• NEW n........, : ,...... Iry .--4----t-- 1 Cl- III• :Ise—. - - \s..,,:.1 71 __ Q -Dc .. ----°'‘..), i S j \`..\' F^u.en - :a!.mot _..) . 1 /.7../C:-. - • Io , 1 f '+ 1 ' " ' ' e� ' 1 a d 11 4, ..a 4. a .k. j -..) • $C CC ,....4! li -`!, a . r• CI I I z. ti 1.- , / / - LL /' j ! ii d al O I I `— i / 1 1 If 1__—L _1 -1-ller 1 1 0 SW Durham Road PLOT PLAN 11 CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP sDR95-0014 VAR 95-0009 SLR 95-0010 .. --A 1 C Li .L i - I H i v. co :ill 0-* _ - a_ 1. SIT : - p 0 „mu r-Ail • r•-. e I C f do C s� 411Ie '�o CO (Ne4A_40K;Or a_ ; L o -C3 .• • _I P,c,, Oti -4, L U Vicinity Map CASE: SDR95-0014 VAR95-0009 SLR 95-0010 i Note: Map is not to scale N Duncan Industrial Building '1 d. --rc C _ 7.4 fo, tz aC ■ SIT : .. �� - 8 , .„4147,11r, . ,C2,1 41151/0 � -C , 4,(■r N4 C , Opk 41° 111.0, Ry '� 0 :°'I 7 • P'g tG 0 i,ti > , I - v _ (-- Vicinity Map CASE: SDR95-0014 ) VAR95 0009 SLR 95-0010 Note: Map is not to scale N Duncan Industrial Building REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • I- RECEIVED PLANNING On On November 2, 1995 NOV 0 6 1995 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard Region 1 Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FILE CODE:P/9 Ti/� � Att: Mark Roberts Re: SDR 95-0014, VAR 95-0009 Thank you for providing ODOT the opportunity to review the above referenced application. Our comments are as follows: • The site is located adjacent to Durham Road (Beaverton-Tualatin Highway) and SW 74th Avenue. The Oregon Transportation Plan, 1991 designates this portion of Durham Road a district highway which provides for efficient and safe medium speed and medium to high-volume traffic movements on intercity, intracity and inter- community routes. • The proposed development, an industrial office and warehouse facility, has the potential to generate traffic sufficient to negatively impact the functioning of Durham Road. Therefore, we are recommending that a traffic impact analysis be performed. Specifically, impacts to the intersection of SW 74th and Durham Road should analyzed. Trip generation projections for nearby Durham Elementary School, which recently submitted an application for an expansion that would double its student enrollment, should be included in the scenario. Please feel free to contact me at 731-8282 if you have any questions regarding the above comments. Thank you. Niv Sonya a en, Assistant Planner Development Review ODOT Region 1 cc: Laurie Nicholson, Development Review, Region 1 ab. Martin Jensvold, Traffic Analysis, Region 1 Robert Schmidt, Permit Specialist, District 2A 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 Form 734-1850 I11d, rev�duncan.doc FAX (503)87331)-8259 s 11/2/95 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mark Roberts October 23, 1995 FROM: Greg Berry RE: SDR 95-0014/VAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Description: The applicant requests Site Development Review to construct a 13 , 970 square foot industrial office/warehouse facility between SW 74th Avenue and Fanno Creek. The requested Variance is to allow a front setback of 15 feet. Findings : 1 . STREETS : Access to the site is along SW 74th Avenue, a local commercial street requiring 50 feet right-of-way width, 34 feet paved width and 5 foot wide sidewalks . Portions of the site are fully improved with curb and sidewalk; the remaining portion is improved with curb only. The plans show the sidewalk will be completed. The submitted site plan shows that the street has an existing paved width of 26 . 5 feet. The east side of the street fronts along railroad property and is improved only with ditch and culverts within a 20 feet from centerline right-of-way. This side of the street should be improved with curbs and an inlet at the existing culvert . The railroad parcel provides the applicant with paved parking spaces; construction of additional parking spaces is proposed. The widths of the proposed driveways for this parking exceed the maximum width of 30 feet permitted by City standards. The site plan shows a 4 foot wide painted pedestrian crossing across SW 74th Avenue from the site to the parking area within the railroad property. Since no other traffic control devices are proposed, the crossing should not be permitted. 2 . SANITARY SEWER: Service is proposed from an existing 60 inch sanitary interceptor manhole within the floodplain and wetlands along the west of the project area. The connection will require a permit from the Unified Sewerage Agency and is expected to require a water tight inside drop connection. 3 . STORM SEWER: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0014 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 1 The parking area within the railroad property drains to an existing ditch along the side of the street. The site is drained by a private storm drainage system that outfalls to an existing pond that will be used as a treatment facility. The facilities plans shows that the existing pond will be converted to a treatment facility by installing an outlet device. Additional treatment will be provided by an undisturbed corridor upland of an existing wetlands surrounding the pond. A wetlands study for the limits of the wetlands shown on the plans has not been submitted. The portion of the site below an elevation of 130 feet is inundated by the 100-year flood. Although the floodplain is not shown on the site map, it closely follows the lower edge of the proposed parking lot . Recommendations : PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall submit written authorization from Burlington Northern Railroad to construct the proposed parking on its property. 2 . Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the western S.W. 74th Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 3 . The applicant shall complete construction of the sidewalk along the entire west frontage of SW 74th Street and install a curb along the leased portion of the east frontage to City standards. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) 4 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 5 . The applicant shall pay the Water Quantity fee as established by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order #91-47 . 6 . The site plan shall be revised to eliminate intended street ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0014 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 2 crossing, revise the width of proposed driveways to the parking on the east side of S.W. 74th Avenue to conform to City standards and show the 100-year floodplain. 7 . The applicant shall submit an approved permit from the Unified Sewerage Agency for the connection to the existing sanitary sewer. 8 . Detailed construction plans and calculations, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for the water quality I facility in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution Order #91-47. 9. The applicant shall submit a wetlands delineation report . IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1. SECTION 18 . 160 . 170 Improvement Agreement A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall : 1 . Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2 . Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant . B. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract . 2 . SECTION 18 . 120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES A. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall : 1. Require a bond in an amount not grater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and 2 . Approve and release such bonds. B. The bond shall be release when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0014 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 3 plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. 3 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS . Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. APPROVED: 9 Randall R. Wooley City Engineer n:\engineer\sdr95-14.gnb ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0014 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING PAGE 4 I • • N LIA RECEIVED PLANNING Pr 15- TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE NOV 2 71995 " � AND ,ç J BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT 4 `-1 7 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive• P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526-2469• FAX 526-2538 RF&RES GJ November 15, 1995 Jim Nicoli Nicoll Engineering P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: John Duncan Warehouse & Office Building 16055 S.W. 74th Tigard, Oregon Dear Jim: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. The following items need to be addressed or corrected for the above noted project prior to construction. 1. Access appears to be acceptable to this building, however, no parking signs need to be installed along the extruded curb, across the driving surface south from office area to running to the west until across from the handicapped parking at office area 1. The extruded curb needs to be painted bright yellow, no parking signs shall state: "NO PARKING", "TOW AWAY ZONE", "FIRE LANE", "ORS 98.810-812". They shall be posted no closer than 4 feet to the ground nor higher than 6 feet above the ground and shall be placed often enough to be conspicuously seen. 2. Hydrants were not shown on the submitted plans. Hydrants shall be not greater than 250 feet from all portions of the building measured around the building and "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives t . Jim Nicoli November 15, 1995 Page 2 along the access roadway. Measurements shall not be taken across adjacent private property. i.e., the north side of the proposed building. If automatic sprinkler protection is installed and depending upon the hazard involved in the warehouse, hydrant spacing may be extended to as far as 400 feet. Fire hydrants shall be provided within 70 feet of a fire department connection (FDC) and both the FDC and the fire hydrant shall be located on the same side of access roadways as not to block operations during fire fighting. 3. Included is a fire flow calculation sheet and a handout describing procedures for calculating fire flow. Please complete the work sheet and resubmit to this office for review and approval. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469. Sincerely, 4-- - a Gene Birchill, DFM Plans Examiner GB:kw Enc. cc: Mark Roberts I/ Tigard Planning Dept. RED ,.:1) PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD NOV 2 71995 OREGON 1995 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FIRE MHKSriAL'S pFF10E DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Washington County Fire Marshall FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — X Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PCease provide the fotlowinwinfomeation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: C� l EcJ= )16-1G 4 Phone Number(s): SDR r 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS OCT 2 41995 DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Michael Miller, Operations Water Division Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING �1 A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 7.2lg i)DC rex- 77II Fixes-/J/E N/4Y ,8E LocAr6D /A15/DC 77 B14'4-0.,&/4; f' 711E DEV'cE /s 1,100 rrEn DA/ Ate/ &once acv&4-- 1 51 77 1co0� PPAiV SIo+JS A4- File 6'P2(&IICLE✓L. Or7N1 IA) 7-E /AJ7E sod.. DF 77/e Bu/t.o/#/(l ti/EED T 23E LocAT-ED /AJ A- V4-ui-r 4-r 7Z'E" "kc■PZ.27V L h/C ((T2Eir v IC/GrliT--oo 1.--/AY) . ►. (P(easeprovide the following infonnaaon) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Mik..E b1' Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING 4, CITY OF TIGARD OREGON CCT 19 1995 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 01111DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Brian Moore, Portland General Electric FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Q A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V (Please provide the fogowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: R - Phone Number(s): 42,90 - SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLAN TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS OC1 1 6 1995 DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Dave Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 ➢ DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVE() PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD OCT 1 6 1995 OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Development Service Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 ➢ DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING G A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PI AIMING MEMORANDUM TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT OC i 1 .1 1995 TO: Mark Roberts \ FROM: Kelley Jennings/Crime Prevention Specialist ,4 DATE: October 16, 1995 SUBJECT: SDR 95-0014/Duncan Industrial Bldg. Mark I have looked at the proposed SDR and have some concerns about the exterior lighting as follows: *The parking lot lighting is inadequate as is proposed. Particularly on the westside parking lot there is none. There is a light pole indicated to be placed at a curb line of the parking lot just south of the screened dumpster fence but will be interfered with as the Douglas Fir tree matures next to the pole. I see no proposed pole lighting for the parking lot across the street on the east side of SW 74th Ave. *On the north side of the bdlg. there is a door from office area#1 that has no lighting and will be particularly dark at that location any time of the year. On the south side there is a door at the opposite location that has a pole light but I am not sure that it will light the doorway adequately. *There are two wallpack lighting fixtures proposed over the two overhead doors on the south side but no mention to the proposed wattage that they will be. *The entire ground floor area of"Office area #1" facing out towards the wetlands area of Fanno Creek needs lighting as well. The proposed landscaping looks acceptable. ALIA CITY OF TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 Y DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Ifyouu are unable_to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. w g..34-0 Written comments provided below: = 4 1),-Yak aA.)--&-ja,g12, " v (M ase provide the forbwi g infom►aevn) Name of Person(s) Commenting: • Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: October 13, 1995 J(., 1 1 ( 1995 TO: Ray Valone, Advanced Planning Division FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 ➢ DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: \ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: . I Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD OREGON ,,1;T 17 1995 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Jim Wieskamp, General Telephone Electric Engineering Dept. FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 ➢ DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING . A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. . Written comments provided below: DEVELOPER TC7 P C Loris.)J /CoNookr'S to vTEs 6PEC1 =�ca-rrorv�. v � (Please provide tie following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 'Y�""�' r I Phone Number(s): C S 03) (c20- 9• 3 SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS 4► CITY OF TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 13, 1995 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Q A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square fool one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 23, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 14 �► (Please provide the following infonnation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 'iok gS-001Y REQUEST FOR COMMEN , _ i/4--'2 9 wpl NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS • CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS I {circle one) I _CIT Area: IN) (S) (E) (C) •" Placed for review in Library CIT Book ••• CPO NO. CITY DEPARTMENTS BLDG. DEPT./Dave Scott, slag.official POLICE DEPTJKeIIy Jennings QFRATIONS/John Acker, MalnLSpvsr. _CITY ADMINJCathy Wheatley, atvaar. 17-7—E14%.DEPT./Michael Anderson, pev.uewewena ' COM.DEV. DEPT./D.S.T.'S ADV. PLNGJC.tol 1 819, senior manner j WATER DEPT./Michael Miller, Operations Mgr. rr SPECIAL DISTRICTS t=FIRE MARSHALL L-UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER D1ST. Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. $16, Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis (CPA's) — STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _Jim Tice ((GA'S) Sam Hunaidi t_/ODOT/REGION 1 _Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning _Scott King (CPA's) Portland, OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland, OR 97209-4037 Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD (CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street, N.E. _OTHER _CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem, OR 97310-0590 Larry Conrad, Senior Planner _CITY OF PORTLAND PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM Planning Director Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland, OR 97204 _CITY OF KING CITY Tigard, OR 97281-3483 City Manager _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 15300 SW 116th _CITY OF TUALATIN City Manager King City, OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 SPECIAL AGENCIES ENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC L PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Jim Wieskamp, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard, OR 97281-3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, OR 97005 _NW NATURAL GAS CO. pnone:(so31 721-2449 _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS �_TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer Fax )503)721-2502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox, Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland, OR 97232 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M.Forney, PLS-Project Eng. 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave., Room 324 Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Union Station Portland, OR 97209 STATE AGENCIES / FEDERAL AGENCIES _AERONAUTICS DIVISION (000T) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS `— US POSTAL SERVICE _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H. PARK _FISH & WILDLIFE Randy Hammock, Growth Cord. _ PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland, OR 97229-9998 U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS —OTHER n:UOgln\pattWrQloticrost MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAC .NG 4k STATE OF OREGON ) CITY OF TIGARD County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. 7 IV1 That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 1) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Check box above,if applicable) (check appropriate box below) City of Tigard Planning Director 1 Tigard Planning Commission Vi Tigard Hearings Officer I I Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED f 1) DECISION FOR: {Check box above,if applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED L ) FINAL ORDER FOR: {Check box above,if applicable) (check appropriate box below) I I City of Tigard Planning Director I I Tigard Planning Commission I Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the ads ess(s) s own on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 44- day of ,oj— 1995, and deposited in the United States Mail on the day of 0,1 .id , 1995, po tage prepaid. alF ' i / 4 OVA / (-1.die,r(.--- epared Notic� ,, ii j I Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I*day day of w 111 'r 19 ft /.''.4,• OFFICIAL SEAL , 4 I • . a DIANE M JELDERKS ' r NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON M ®7 � COMMISSION NO.046142 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,192.4 NO ARY PUBLI • OREGON My Commission - sires: FILE INFO.: eM ,f,� NAME(S): TA1CA/Y) �,/idi.,L S'Gr rod gidg .,�,r /42,7_7 /� CASE NO.(S): D&% 60141 044(q5:-(/000/ / S�q 0/q5- TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: l'-1 la 42• 'adze- PUBLIC HEARIF NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1995 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, ��11I1 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 p4 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: CITY OF TIGARD FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0010 FILE TITLE: DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING APPLICANT: John Duncan OWNER: Same 16055 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 684-0044 REQUEST: A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square foot one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. The applicant has applied for a variance to the required 20 foot front yard setback. The applicant has also proposed land form alterations within the 100-year floodplain to connect to an existing sewer line in Fanno Creek. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, CRITERIA: 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial uses within an Industrial Park setting. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009/SLR 95-0010 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 11/27/95 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE ' ''ARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITI INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE _IC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PL, ,SON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUFrORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER NOVEMBER 6, 1995 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. Ir-till11 ' lflilr-741b;' Mill 4 I ' On -. El I rol.Mir \ :rte ,, . 0 ) \ :Nunn mom MI *um - `A - 4. 1ti "0 i m1111111111 ::::::::... - , 2.,--- :::::: ::.::.::.:::::::::::::!:::::::::::::::.!:..::::' ‘ a EGA 4� R � M 001111°.:c. ss. a Q SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009/SLR 95-0010 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 11/27/95 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SDR 95-0014/VAR 95-0009 .CAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING faik 1/2 ) EXHIBIT 2S 113AB-00300 2S113AB-00500 it l AKERMAN, RICH/WATHEY,JAMES E AKERMAN, RICHARD D& 16075 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD WATHEY,JAMES E TIGARD OR 97224 16075 SW ONS FRY RD D OR 97229 2S113AB-00400 2S112DC-01200 AKERMAN, RICHARD D& AKERMAN,RICHARD D& WATHEY,JAMES E WATHEY,JAMES E 16075 SW UPR BOONS FRY RD BY NW LANDSC•• •' STRIES TIGARD OR 97229 16075 S e .-• BOONES FRY RD •RD OR 97224 2S112DC-01100 2S113AB-00700 AKERMAN, RICHARD D& B&R INVESTMENTS WATHEY,JAMES E 16255 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD BY NW LANDSCAPE INDUSTRIES TIGARD OR 97224 16075 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S1 12C D-00700 2S 113AB-00900 BOUMAN, DONNA L CASE, DAVID 15940 SW 76TH AVE CASE,DANIEL TIGARD OR 97223 4630 SW 39TH DR PORTLAND OR 97221 2S113AB-00800 2S113BA-00400 DUNCAN,JOHN A AND HAMBACH,HAROLD C&MILDRED M JANICE LEE HAMBACH,MICHAEL V AND 16055 SW 74TH AVE BROWN,LORENE ET AL TIGARD OR 97223 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CD-01000 2S112CD-00800 HAMBACK,HAROLD MILDRED HAVERY,JOHN W MADELON 7735 SW DURHAM RD 15970 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S112DC-01400 2S113AB-01500 LOY CLARK PIPELINE CO, INC MT HOOD CHEMICAL CORP 3905 SW 141ST 4444 NW YEON AVE BEAVERTON OR 97005 PORTLAND OR 97210 2S112DC-00201 2S112DC-01300 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P PASTOR,WILLIAM A 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#200-WMI 15930 SW 74TH PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 2S1 12C D-00900 2S1 12C D-07400 RIVAS, ERNEST ROSE SAM GOTTER DEVELOPMENT CO 16060 SW 76TH AVE PO BOX 23023 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97281 2S113EAr01C00 rum K CD C-1/IICAL CLRR 4444 Wl J _K ILADD CR 97210 SDR 95-0014/VAR 95-0009 "TNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING (Page 2/2 ) go* EXHPPIT 2S112CD-07500 2S112DC-01500 SAM GOITER DEVELOPMENT CO SCHREINER,ELMER ELLEN PO BOX 23023 15715 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD 0 1 TIGARD OR 97223 2S113AB-01000 TROMLEY, RUSSELL F was'IER'1 IKUSIRIAL SUPPLY CC. 1500 OAK TERRACE FO ECX 1429 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 `1(YALATIN CR 97062 JCfH I N PN 16055 SW 741H AVER£ TIC E D CR 97224 -0-/-ease AFFIDAVIT OF MAIONG A.,* STATE OF OREGON ) " CITY Y OF TIGARD County of Washington )ss. ' City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Check box above,if applicable) (check appropriate box below) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council Li That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED C) DECISION FOR: (Check box above,if applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director IV( That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Check box above,if applicable) {check appropriate box below) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director V Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the ad.y'ess(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the /5- day of FL ,,,,L, 1995, and deposited in the United States Mail on the /6-16 day of ifir ) 1995, post. :e prepaid. c____X. . igt—i-esL A*.0,(- Prepared Notice / .- Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I day of l J7- , 19 40-1,, OFFICIAL SEAL 0 *=*�� DIANE M JELDERKS ��pp ` NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �, . I y,n `,.: COMMISSION NO.046142 NU✓, L / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON My Commission Expires: FILE INFO.::dnw� /T^ ,I NAME(S): J j t eA ) -Lila, 6-1-4-' .gy ,,/ �}� /�/� Q� CASE NO.(S): 5 qS-14/c "IJ-i O/I�j-ike -14/5 . TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER C=> BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER CONCERNING CASE NUMBER(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0010 VARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009 CONCFk'N/NG THE T/T/E(S).• DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING NAME OF OWNER: John Duncan NAME OF APPLICANT: John Duncan ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: 16055 SW 74th Avenue City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 16055 SW 74th Avenue City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 TAX MAP 5 LOT NO(S).: WCTM 2S1 13AB, tax lot 800 Request: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a 13,970 square foot industrial building and Sensitive Lands Review to perform landform alterations within the 100-Year Floodplain, 100-Year Floodway and Wetlands areas to connect to an existing sanitary sewer line in Fanno Creek. The Hearing's Officer denied the applicants request for a five foot setback variance to the 20 foot corner sideyard setback requirement to SW 74th Avenue. Zone: Planned Industrial (I-P). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.68, 18.84, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.134, 18.160 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. Action: i ❑ Approval as requested I Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: I] Owners of record within the required distance El Affected governmental agencies CI The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ID The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON DECEMBER 26, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of$315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of$500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 26, 1995. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (503) 639-4171. SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL.BUILDING NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER (COVER SHEET) BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR TIGARD, OREGON Regarding a request by John Duncan for a ) FINAL ORDER Site Development Review to develop an ) SDR 95-0014 industrial/office building, a Sensitive Lands ) SLR 95-0010 Review to alter the land form to connect to ) VAR 95-0009 a sanitary sewer line in the 100 year flood ) (John Duncan) plain and wetlands along Fanno Creek, and ) a Variance from the side yard setback standards. I. FINDINGS The hearings officer adopts and incorporates herein the Tigard Community Development Staff Report dated November 20, 1995 (the "Staff Report"), including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval standards, agency comments, and evaluation of the request, except to the extent expressly modified. II. HEARING The hearings officer conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on November 27, 1995. The following testimony was offered in relevant part. 1 . City Planner Mark Roberts summarized the staff report. He recommended two revisions to the conditions: a. A new condition 9i should be added related to the front setback variance request, which was withdrawn by the applicant. It was recommended in the staff report that the applicant revise the site plan to show a minimum 20 foot front yard setback from SW 74th Ave., but the conditions failed to incorporate the setback requirement. b. Condition 9d deals with the 1 5-foot pedestrian/bike pathway easement. The City would be willing to stipulate that the alignment of the trail be placed in areas other than those the applicant proposes to develop. 2. The hearings officer said that she had drafted potential added and amended conditions to cover discrepancies between the staff report and the proposed conditions: a. New condition 9i: The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide at least a 20-foot setback from SW 74th Avenue. SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 1 b. Amended condition 6: The site plan shall be revised to eliminate intended street crossing; revise the width of proposed driveways to the parking on the east side of SW 74th Avenue to conform to City standards; consolidate the proposed driveways to a maximum of one driveway on each side of the street which should be aligned directly opposite each other; and show the 100-year floodplain. (Underlined language is new). 3. Jim Andrews, Nicoli Engineering, representing the applicant, had four concerns regarding the staff report: a. Mr. Duncan wanted to have the hearings officer consider his application for a variance of 5 feet from the required 20 foot setback. b. Mr. Duncan has a concern about the proposed condition requiring construction of a sidewalk and a curb along SW 74th Ave. Mr. Duncan is in the process of purchasing the Burlington Northern Railroad property and he would like to defer putting in curbs and making improvements to the property until he purchases the property. Mr. Duncan improved SW 74th in 1988 on his own, so he has some reservation about making further improvements when he has already paved the street and installed sidewalks on the street. He questions making curb improvements on the site that he does not own that belongs to the railroad. Several years ago he went to the expense of improving the street and Tigard didn't require curbs. The existing parking was built several years ago and Tigard didn't require curbs. He is only adding 53 spaces to the existing parking and he doesn't understand why Tigard is requiring curbs now when it didn't require them then. c. Mr. Duncan has a concern about the condition requiring the dedication of a 1 5-foot easement for the pedestrian bicycle pathway. Mr. Duncan opposes the open- ended easement agreement that Tigard requires him to enter for this project. He would like some language in the condition so that he would have some participation in the location of the pathway and its impacts on his property. d. Regarding the proposed condition to consolidate the driveways, Mr. Andrews pointed out that of the five driveways in the plan, four are existing driveways. One is to a loading dock that goes to a service door in the existing Jadco building. He said the site will function fine if one of the driveways to the Railroad property is closed, but if the driveway to the service door is closed that would create a hardship for the Jadco operation. III. SITE VISIT The hearings officer visited the site before the hearing without the company of others. She observed the site, the parking lot, the existing building, access, the nature of surrounding development and terrain, and condition of surrounding streets. SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 2 IV. DISCUSSION 1 . City staff recommended approval of the application subject to conditions in the Staff Report. The hearings officer finds that the Staff Report contains all the applicable standards for the application and the findings showing that the application can comply with those standards. Except for the variance request, those findings are not disputed in large part. The hearings officer adopts those findings as her own, to the extent they are not disputed as expressly provided otherwise in this final order in support of a decision to approve the Site Development Review and the Sensitive Lands Review requests. 2. The record was kept open for seven days to obtain additional information on the request for variance from side yard setback standards. The applicant included the variance request in the original application and the city included it within the notice of public hearing but the applicant withdrew the variance request and it was not addressed in the Staff Report. a. The applicant supplied written argument in favor of his request for a 5-foot variance from the 20-foot setback requirement from SW 74th Ave. in letters dated June 27, 1995 and December 1 , 1995. The City staff evaluated the variance request in a December 4, 1995 memorandum to the hearings officer and recommended the hearings officer deny the request. b. The two letters from the applicant differed on whether the requirement is for a 20 or a 35 setback and whether the existing Jadco building has a 15 or 20 foot setback. In the first letter the applicant erroneously thought the setback required was 35 feet rather than 20 feet and stated that the Jadco building has a 20 foot setback. In the second letter the applicant corrected the setback required and stated that the Jadco building has a 15 foot setback. The hearings officer notes that the applicant's representations of the setback of the Jadco building's setback are inconsistent. The plans, prepared by the applicant, show the Jadco building has a 20 foot setback, whereas the applicant's December 1 , 1995 letter says it has a 15 foot setback. The hearings officer concluded she did not need to resolve the inconsistency because deciding compliance with the variance standards pivoted on two unrelated criteria, Tigard Community Development Code (TCDC) 18.134.050(A) subsections 2 and 4. Subsection 2 requires that the special circumstances that exist on the site not be applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. The application does not meet this criterion because the 100 year flood plain and wetlands areas constraints exist for other properties along Fanno Creek and along SW 74th Ave. in the same zoning district. Subsection 4 requires that the hardship not be self imposed. The application does not meet this Criterion because the majority of the proposed building meets the setback standard and with slight adjustments the remainder of the building could comply. 3. Regarding the proposed condition to construct the sidewalk along the west frontage of SW 74th and a curb along the east SW 74th on the leased portion of the Burlington Northern site, Mr. Roberts said that although Mr. Duncan doesn't presently own the parking site he proposes to develop the site with parking spaces and landscaping. The staff feels TCDC section 18.164, street utility improvements standards, requires these SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 3 sidewalk and curb improvements. The Code doesn't require sidewalks on both sides of the street, so the staff didn't require sidewalk improvements on the east side of 74th Ave. But, the curbing replaces the existing system of ditches on the east side of SW 74th Ave. Because Mr. Duncan is making permanent improvements to the Burlington Northern Railroad site, the staff feels that the curbing is essential to that property and the parking is part of the office warehouse development. He said that the parking use was not required to be a separate application because it is within 300 feet of an industrial building. As the applicant has designed the proposed development, the Duncan building would use the majority of the parking. The TCDC requires the provision of 50 spaces for the new building, so 50 of the 53 proposed parking spaces are required as part of this warehouse/office project. Because the applicant is developing the railroad site for parking to serve the proposed building the TDCD requires the curb improvements. 4. The hearings officer noted that the location of the bikeway easement will be a matter of negotiation between the property owner and the City. Mr. Andrews said that if that were the case that would be fine, but there was no language that assured Mr. Duncan that he would have some say about where the easement will go and what kind of impacts it will have on his property. The hearings officer asked Mr. Andrews if Mr. Duncan would feel more comfortable if the following phrase were added to condition 9d: "the applicant shall negotiate with the City and enter an agreement." He responded it would. 5. Mr. Roberts stated that the staff would not oppose leaving the existing service driveway open because of the design of the existing Jadco building and the limitation of the rest of the site in accessing the main driveway that would be designed to serve both the proposed building and the Jadco building. He said that the staff would support a total of three driveways between the two sites instead of the five proposed. V. CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request does or can comply with the applicable standards of the City of Tigard Community Development Code and should be approved, subject to the conditions of approval in the Staff Report as modified by this final order. VI. ORDER The hearings officer approves the applicant's request for SDR 95-0014 and SLR 95- 0010 subject to the conditions of approval in Section VI of the Staff Report as modified by this final order, but denies the variance request VAR 95-0009. 1 . The following new condition 9i should be added: The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide at least a 20-foot setback from SW 74th Avenue. SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 4 2. The following conditions should be amended as follows: a. Condition 6: The site plan shall be revised to eliminate intended street crossing; revise the width of proposed driveways to the parking on the east side of SW 74th Avenue to conform to City standards; consolidate the proposed driveways so there is a maximum of three driveways; and show the 100-year floodplain. [Amended language is underlined]. b. Condition 9d: The applicant shall negotiate with the City and enter an agreement or contract which says that the applicant will grant a 1 5-foot access easement to the City for the purposes of providing a pedestrian/bicycle pathway. This easement shall be located within the floodplain area and the alignment of the trail will take place in areas other than those proposed to be developed. The agreement shall be valid for a period of 12 months while the City undertakes a study to determine the preferred location of the pathway along this section of Fanno Creek. [Amended language is underlined]. Dated this 13th Day of December 1995 /cP.zr.2..ezcz: Deniece B. Won City of Tigard Hearings Officer SDR 95-0014, SLR 95-0010, VAR 95-0009 Final Order - Page 5 I it --- P130322ED BWLDMCs ■ \ 1 \ ' vi f<l,is era rawe se••.,..Y fTYp►'QTf YL?O.LOO.P.1::::%;12 Y %I. K—. ITT RPOR O• 9.I AS•'Su I�Wassw ?•.•-..: .pOY�,C _. _, , Joao 4m•o•c••re..w Y. nwow•. YJSSm o-r r ��� 1 •P• arse's*Lnr..ro. "1.-..r■ •• -- : Ni/VIEP • '''' ,,,..r —:_.....L AM, . i.7 .. ,,, ......__\ • c...... • ..„ „..... _ ......, „....." .c„....2.2.......impli„ -.1.4„......-,--- . .. a.. . . . , .. , ,.,..., :., . _ ?r- i ‘ \ . LLJ CI :I --2-.--1 _r\al, \j; .. . MSS i I 1--- '1 • :. 'r.',•_, 7 0 \ ‘4/11 gr 1 1$ • co ,, : ,_. 1 0 PIF II G-SillIND • / If ! i WACO Me 1 fr• '` �i --- 1'—' 6 i_= � .9 • ii/ f s, i s: 0 i L.L . >' SW Durham Road 0 PLOT PLAN 11 CASE NO- EXHIBIT MAP 111 SDR95-0014 VAR 95-0009 SLR 95-0010 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL AUILDING • SDR 95-0014/SLR 95-0010/VAR " -0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BIT (Page 1/1) NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY TE. ARING'S OFFICER JOHN DUNCAN LX I 3 16055 SW 74TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97224 JIM ANDREWS NICOLI ENGINEERING 9025 SW CENTER STREET TIGARD OR 97223 I u,>vJ2 wad .tea .4;e- �+;,,, C ITY OF TIGARD, OREGON iin� i � ��_ /tom/�+ a APPLICATION '})'f� &et op Cape �� v!�`v� ()ccv iti4c CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. 4> 6:431S7-0011-4 VAK 15---- 4 OTHER CASE NO'S: SL 45.- OO((3 RECEIPT NO. 26?3 APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ,M,t, r DATE: to - Z3 -°I C 1. GENERAL INFORMATION I Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 16065 4,44, 741e- Aiwa_ I I/ (A�A) Application form (1) V(B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 25 l 13AE:, *11300 I authorization 1 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE (a.1 8 At., (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* c)6•41E Ac, APP L1GAIAT I k /,/ (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS PHONE I F) Applicant's statement CITY ZIP I (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* 4{. C.26.44,4:::-".")j I "l Q(G) List of property owners and ADDRESS ((o 6 610, 1410 PHONE ( 4-oo4'- I addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY 'rtl,,AL.n ZIP 9?.224 I "' (H) Filing fee - !`.QP *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DE IN .9 BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written ` Z 2- authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ ONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY /J P The owners of record of the subject property �� request a Sensitive Lands Permit to allow Z-17— E5 COKCTt.UCT1014 L Z 3 f TOO ' . . 1t .EHou56 /0Fnic,E. STRULruQ. , Approval Date: P te,. SVre. LMPROYE.NIENTS Final Approval Date: Planning 0523P/13P Engineering Rev'd: 3/88 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: /AIZIANGE 2.6AUAIZDI .&(= 74°,4E.. 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants - so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 2 Co ni day of ,lIt-M 19 9 5 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. Cam\ , (KSL:pm/0737P) • CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0014NARIANCE (VAR) 95-0009/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0010 FILE TITLE: DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING APPLICANT: John Duncan OWNER: Same 16055 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 684-0044 REQUEST: A request to construct a 13,970 industrial office/warehouse facility. The project consists of a 9,152 square foot one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. LOCATION: 16055 SW 74th Avenue. The site borders Fanno Creek to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east. ZONE: Planned Industrial (I-P). The I-P zone permits a range of light industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, CRITERIA: 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION _ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER Wetlands Report STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317 SDR 95-0014NAR 95-0009 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 10/13/95 PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS July 7, 1995 Nicoli Engineering CITY OF TIGARD and Construction Services, Inc . Attention: Jim Andrews OREGON 9025 SW Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/ Site Development Review 95-0014 Sensitive Lands Review 95-0010 Variance 95-0009 Dear Jim; This letter is in response to the Site Development Review submittal for the Duncan Property. Upon further review, this application will need to provide a wetlands delineation for areas within and adjoining the proposed development site. Because the Comprehensive Plan identifies this specific portion of the Fanno Creek wetlands as an especially significant natural resource a minimum of a 25 foot buffer natural area buffer is required to be provided upon development of the site. Due to the topography of the site special concern will need to be given to the area north of the site and the vernal pond within the site . This pond may technically meet the definition of a wetland. For this reason the delineation will need to include the pond. The site plan will also need to be revised to provide a 25 foot setback from the pond. Presently a portion of the proposed parking lot appears to be within 25 feet of the vernal pond/wetlands . Alternatively, a study can be provided which states that the pond is not a wetlands and therefore development can encroach into the 25 foot buffer setback. I've attached the Development Code' s definition of a wetlands for your review. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, ZpAnr4 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP C: Bill Monahan Jim Hendryx Dick Bewersdorff 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 S July 24 , 1995 --■■ ,, �k John A. Duncan CITY OF TIGARD Jadco Chemical Limited 16055 SW 74th Avenue OREGON Portland, OR 97224 Re : Notice of Incomplete Submittal/ Site Development Review 95-0014 Sensitive Lands Review 95-0010 Variance 95-0009 Dear Mr. Duncan; This letter is in response to your letter concerning the status of the site development review submittal for the Duncan Property. This application will need to provide a wetlands delineation for areas within and adjoining the proposed development site . The site plan as proposed may encroach into the 25 foot buffer setback. Because the Comprehensive Plan identifies this specific portion of the Fanno Creek wetlands as an especially significant natural resource a minimum of a 25 foot buffer natural area buffer is required to be provided upon development of the site . Due to the topography of the site special concern will need to be given to the area north of the site and the vernal pond within the site . This pond may technically meet the definition of a wetland. For this reason the delineation will need to include the pond. The site plan will also need to be revised to provide a 25 foot setback from the pond. Presently a portion of the proposed parking lot appears to be within 25 feet of the vernal pond/wetlands . Alternatively, a study can be provided which states that the pond is not a wetlands and therefore development can encroach into the 25 foot buffer setback . However, a delineation of the wetlands areas which adjoin this site will be necessary to determine the appropriate areas to develop new site improvements . Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP C: Jim Andrews 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 August 14, 1995 Nicoli Engineering '+ '�11 and Construction Services Inc. CITY OF TIGARD Attention: Jim Andrews 9025 SW Center Street OREGON P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal Site Development Review 95-0014 Sensitive Lands Review 95-0010 Variance 95-0009 Dear Jim; This letter is in follow up to the original Notice of Incomplete Submittal for the Duncan Property. This application had been considered incomplete on July 7, 1995. The Community Development Code requires the City to automatically consider the submittal complete and process any application 30 days after the date of the Notice of Incomplete Submittal. At this time the City is required to process the application. Because of the missing information the project would likely be recommended for approval subject to conditions which may require substantial redesign of the proposed development. For this reason I would recommend that Mr. Duncan waive in writing the 120-day permit processing time limit in order to provide additional time to prepare the necessary wetlands delineation study. In the event that Mr. Duncan does not wish to waive the 120-day time limit we will need something in writing stating that he'd like the current application to be processed as submitted. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, 7274644 , Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 _ _} 12750 S.W. Pacific Hwy. L__ A OF `-R n r\ SRETT n n IN:N P.O. Box 23784 n1 n]lnluv UUU G,11� EIN M L 1 ,: Tigard, Oregon 97223 OATE JOS NO •TTENTION and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 • 20 ./ 5 °I 6n1/11, 1''1,4 r, TO 61T`f OF TU��o RE bl4}.LG.1/4• 1'12-40.\$GT LAA1K.111,t0t 1:)Et?r• 1N1 /TLANN114/1 SL p 41rA1— `1 rF, "1CID•GENTLEMEN: , WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings Q" Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Z 4 iv?,L'p COPIES DATE QNO. DESCRIPTION , 1 2-0 _ �f •I f3•1 8 tt LLLF t ' -' \I Lin g_ 4::=. W Ci rt..4-.14 I-)c-, -� 3 B'Z B'q 5 t2I/StiJPl,la° WW-1.464-1D' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 1:1---For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED:� '1::), I .e l � � NI tr FrI fiJ Iii I�ri KRIALIIIMINAINN M • Willi magnum: i I MIN and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: (503) 620-2086 SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR: NEW WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE BUILDING OWNER: JOHN DUNCAN 16055 S.W. 74th AVE. TIGARD, OREGON SITE INFORMATION TAX MAP NO.: 26 1 13AB TAX LOT NO.: 800 TABLE OF CONTENTS — CITY OF TIGARD APPLICATION FORM — ACCESSOR'S MAP — VICINITY MAP — SITE PLAN — APPLICANT'S STATEMENT — VARIANCE REQUEST — LETTER REGARDING LAND USE NOTIFICATION MEETING — AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING — AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING — MAILING LIST — SIGN IN SHEET FROM MEETING 05,•04'95 08:33 $503 228 7821 TICOR PORTLAND V1012 - a TAX . '; /93 NW 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 13 T2S R I W W.M.■ WASHINGTON COUNTY ORE004 SCALE 11= 100' eon AMMAG / dEE 6lAP 29 1 12DC SEC MAP 1$00 b 23 112C0 .Due. W Q 2• •.51 # 4• sgeTaZ II• 4c... AMMO". • .k 500 /J• f.fl AG ICI u�o61 F A 11 T'1 O C H ��r �<. 36 f � x. ICt 1:nejl try � \ ACR rFt C7, 77, SITE • a 4'4, a000\ ` rid' � .u,a ,� G �7 1°` ., 'fib .. / ,' \ . / 3 700AIv i t VF''' •w� 'i . '�C. / rt t .�� / j ��; . � �"� If 'y '23-74 14• y `01• � ' aAc ►q • jet j I,, 900 p„ SEE MAP a / �4g ` � Z31 1$IA �+\�` 4 I5oo r�b'- . \4 ,'4• �� �. 1201 \ • TI 0`4 tar AR +�y / e• I,AI AP. \�'w, �,.1 v . d I , 1 j lei 11!{61 .• I i! r 23.67 �'" f I ' \L.� I ' i II.. bj �' I ! •1.'•QQ4$5 4 1400 S i. I I > tI I •► 1 I ■ 18 1 1 ` - 1 I OG 1 1 I 'Qy QG fr 1 cA matt) I I S J r I d' I 1 1 I TIGARD 8011114 ROAD th s ( II IU " W t 13 (i d) III U r 0 co `� j i41 L', 1 t' r I. he -� (j 1 <� I TAX MAP NO. 25I I3AB —PROPOSED TAX LOT! 1'8(00 ) BUILDING SITE DURNAM ROAD 4 " 12-JADCO, INC.— f f)0 BUILDING ■ / DURHAM NORTH 01,--1 IL) VIClN1Y MAP 16055 5.W. 14th AVE. g TIGARD, OR 91224 n O A vi n 0 I iv ,1 [ PROJLCT: NEW WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE BUILDING _ 4.11A(P igq I f I Cl1ENI: JOHN DUNCAN R and Construction Set vices Inc Phone: (503) 620-2086 I)AIE: 5/9/95 [JOH NO. 950110 I PREPARED AY: EJBI PAGE NO. 2 or 2 ■' I E E RING and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784-Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 June 27, 1995 City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Office/Warehouse facility John Duncan 16055 S.W. 74th Avenue Tax Lot 800 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT The applicant is proposing to develop a portion of the site just north of the existing Jadco Chemical building. The project consists of a 9, 152 square foot one story warehouse/manufacturing facility with 5,622 square foot two story office structures. The proposed project is being constructed as a speculative development and will not be a part of the existing Jadco Chemical business. The site is bordered by the natural features of Fanno Creek and its flood plain to the west and south, and 74th Avenue to the east . The buildings orientation and site development takes advantage of the unique natural features by orientating the office views to the Fanno Creek area and enhancing the existing bank by reestablishing this border with native plants consistent with the existing vegetation. The site parking and circulation areas have been designed in such a way as not to encroach into the flood plain or disturb any of the adjacent low lands along Fanno Creek. Due to the existing natural constraints not all of the required parking can be located adjacent to the building. Some of the parking has been located on this site with the remaining required parking being located across 74th Avenue in the existing parking lot and with additional new parking being added to the north of the lot. The existing lot now utilized by Jadco will be upgraded with landscape islands and curbing. Both the existing Jadco facility and the new structure will use this parking lot . City of Tigard _ Community Development Dept. June 27, 1995 Page 2 To the best of our knowledge the proposed development meets all applicable code requirements. If any further information is required please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely,lyn Q1414141445t:;:James D. Andrews, Project manager JDA:mlh ._--.•._�.. _ _ .. _ .- may--' - -.._1 r_ •__ .._ _ _..__ _r��. ______.__ .. _ _ _______ . _ _ . 1 i and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503)684-3636 May 8, 1995 To Whom It May Concern Re: Proposed Office & Warehouse/manufacturing facility Dear Interested Party: Nicola Engineering is representing John Duncan, the owner of the property located at 16055 S. W. 74th (see attached site plan) . We are considering proposing an office and warehouse/manufacturing facility at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits. 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on Wednesday, May 31 , 1995, at Nicoll Engineering, 9025 S. W. Center Street, Tigard, Oregon, at 6:30 p.m. Please notice this will he an information meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 620-2086 if you have any questions. Sincerely, James D. Andrews, Project Manager JDA:mlh TIGARD BONITA ROAD z Z � j(t n Q I 4 a w CO iO O -la 1Z r r w Q 0 Ne TAX 11AP NO. All .F PROPOSED 2S I I3AB TAX LOT: °SOO BUILDING SITE DURHAM ROAD ,► ' OPO �ti� EXISTING JADCO, INC. oo / BUILDING DURHAM NORTH EIHN VICINITY MAP 16055 S.UJ. 14th AVE. TIGARD, OR 91224 q V. T 0 n 0 I V) kW l 1 i1 101111 PROJECT: NEW WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE BUILDING o .0 IA. d Io I - CLIENT: JOHN DUNCAN and Construction Services Inc. o Phone: (503) 620-2086 DATE: 5/9/95 JOB NO. 950110 I PREPARED BY: EJB1 PAGE NO. 2 OF 2 7 U Name of applicant W A54-1NO-r,k) �bV LATU U 4 ',. 1 rtfrNSQaR-TFf T 1 >N Subject Property Tax Map and Lot # ZS I - (3kl3 ) 4t- 800 j 251 - t3Si #1 00 <OD Address or General Location N0. EL ,1)• 5 De OF- D✓21+-n-p^ fa). Fit NN0 aK, B(24 0 4,c AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I. frEJI Prtivx5 , do affirm that I am (represent) the parry Initiating interest In a proposed 10flfl9 1 pP-e V elvv et�T affecting the land located at VI N"-+o 644s T D A ✓RktANr I'Q and did on the (3 day of TUL-- , 19 q5 personalty post notice indica.ting th the sits may be proposed for a _ S1 irsJ l= LAND application, and the time, date and place of neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal_ The sigr?jtca,s posted at 5bT1+ u---NOS C) -t l 1=Pmt'o ((Le \'- ge_Io6E (A c r rvt TILprFFI C (state location on property) This 4 day of Zi'- 19 9� _,--,":.--- CLL._ Signatu Subs ibed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this i 444/\ day of 7\---(A1241 , 19 (S 1 i-". OFFICIAL SEAL ■ No Public for the State of rre p p� r ^, SUSU+ IIY l lcl l 0 r ' .-� My Commission Expires: f `, , NOIARY PU6LIC-ORfOON r � � COMMIS610N M0. 036a t 9 / MY COMINSSION WIRES JULY 19, 1998 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall -Blvd_ Tigard, OR 97223 login\jo\pc�...LLc t MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED LETTER Cg Un ,` iSRVI1TTrQL CIVIL• STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION _ MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN RECEIVED PLANNING 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 (503)224-9560 (503)224-9570 FAX(503)228-1285 JUN 0 2 1995 Date: June 1 , 1995 Project Number 295161 To: City of Tigard Planning Dept. Attention: Project Name: 74th Ave. Warehouse Please find attached: shop drawings -plans -samples -specifications -copy of letter change order -details calculations Number of copies: Description: (1 ) Each: Affidavit of Posting & Affidavit of Mailing -For your use For your review -For approval _X_As requested REMARKS: Copy to: Signed: Dave Williams/as X Mailed Delivered -To be picked up If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) I, David Wi l 1 i ams , being duly sworn, depose and say that on May 26 , 19 95 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at S.W. 74th Avenue south of Bonita Road , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Johns Landing , with postage prepaid thereon. .r.. Zilf----.... M,qc - /Sarre i Ass-c. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this � day of , 19,,� . N. .ry Pu•- is My Commission Expires: ,,,:::,74:e. OFFICIAL SEAL 4r1*€ MARILYN B MC ALISTER NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON tFto COMMISSION NO.034989 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 09, 1998 h:\login\jo\affmail.cit MACKENZIE/S, . J & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET • PO BOX 69039 PORTLAND. OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9570 • FAX (503)228-1285 May 25, 1995 Re: 74th Avenue Warehouse MSA Project Number 295161 Dear Interested Party: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates (MSA) represents the owner of the property located on S.W. 74th Avenue south of S.W. Bonita Road. The owner is considering proposing a site development review application for a new warehouse at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Monday, June 12, 1995 Water Department Auditorium 8777 S.W. Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 7 p.m. Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 224-9570 if you have any questions. Sincerely, David L. Williams, Architect LS:DLW/kc F:\W PDATAL95-05\95161\24L 1.kc M1I _ 'h' Owner Name Site Address Phone Farm # ADAIR CLYDE W & JOANN *NO SITE ADDRESS* 590-2640 2 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT *NO SITE ADDRESS* 7 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT *NO SITE ADDRESS* 5 CORNUTT JACQUELINE TR *NO SITE ADDRESS* 590-4338 3 GARVEY KIRK W & LAURA 7745 SW GENTLE WOODS DR 11 HUBBARD MARK W & VIOL 15115 SW 74TH AVE 639-5856 9 INTERSTATE ROOFING IN 15065 SW 74TH AVE 684-5611 8 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES U *NO SITE ADDRESS* 4 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCI *NO SITE ADDRESS* 6 PASTOR WILLIAM A 15245 SW 74TH AVE 10 TIGARD CITY OF(IL A,J *NO SITE ADDRESS* 1 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. For: DAVID W9ILEAMS By: F, It IVERSON TIGARD CITY Clyde & Joanne Adair Jacqueline Cornutt PO Box 23 14655 SW 139th Ave 11720 SW Lynn St Tigar , OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 'ACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATE CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT COR OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLI 5 5 " Se. qia ?)`C ; !' PROPERTY TAX DEPARTM 111 SW 5th Ave #3400 #• '! o -W } ,f 201 Mission St Portland, OR 97204 P . 1 n.• •R 93224 San Francisco, CA 94105 INTERSTATE ROOFING INC Mark & Viola Hubbard William Pastor 15065 SW 74th Ave 15115 SW 74th Ave 15930 SW 74th Ave Portland, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Joel Stevens Kirk & Laura Garvey 9660 SW Ventura Court 7745 SW Gentle Woods Dr Tigard OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Mary Swintek Pat Wyden 9915 SW Frewing #23 8122 SW Spruce Tigard OR 97223 Tigard OR 97223 Craig Hopkins PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 7430 SW Varns 15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy Tigard OR 97223 Suite 300 Portland OR 97224 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard OR 97223 LII - - _ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner FROM: Liz Newton, Community Involvement Coordinator DATE: August 1, 1994 (updated list as of 8/1/94) SUBJECT: EAST CIT Area Land Use Notification Effective immediately, please ask your staff to have applicants with proposals in the EAST CIT notify the following people: Mary Swintek 9915 SW Frewing #23 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Hopkins 7430 SW Varns Tigard, OR 97223 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, OR 97223 Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 Name of applicant Adair General Contractors Subject Property: Tax Nap and Lot # N.W. 1/4, S.E. 1/4, Section 12 T2S R1W WM, T.L. 600 Address or General Location S.W. 74th Avenue between Bonita and Durham Road AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE David Williams , do affirm that I am (represent) the parry initiating interest in a proposed warehouse affecting the and located at S.W. 74th Avenue and did on the 25th day of May , 19 95 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Site Development Review application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at midpoint of property line along 74th Avenue (state location on property) This 30th day of May , 19 95 /4,a r.J (R/SA I fa $Acl.c Signature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this day of f.7-7 , P is for the Sta of Oregon 17:77 OFFICIAL SEAL rfary Commission Expires: r 1 MAR ILYN B MC ALISTER NOTARY i'URL ice? COMMII$ION NO.03496IC•OREGON 9 • •.AIMISSIPNl CXPIOS JUNE 03, 1998 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 login\jo\postnotcit Pr'. `N•ml AEII. / i + or r \f j amaW Ca"'*" M urrs.l.rSrbu l Vamp gm ::1411 i 1,1= O 121-2 \ u �1 / OPEN pROFY75ED BUIL,'NCa ':tofI , ........ / \ ..• e — L/ me wwvr wwora.Iw.wr. _ �', �I ( ,ii,_fie •j` ` &hi...H. \\ ..010141161V4-°� \AGQ110 w Imo(' T�"; t �l� I` 1 \ wda�ta �Nr/N�� �, � .e 4 rte/ i *► ��ir� ` 1 . Vs. ...,... . N,,,..,..............:.:01..Tra X �\\ i ; r ,..:;$\ 1Y Irma j`� i,4 eOM I i 1 / ......... . i. -/L'''.1..:;4'j' I i a i ' . It I/ d �p!►'y $ 1 ! %\ i a + +f /�'i x j I t Ex 5T!NG °'TlD /�j/� I If. m . ` `� 74:7 Y li I PEW l ,-1 k\ I % ; AND OFFICE t 711 M ii I / i 16056 Sre 74th P / 1 Tl1ad,Jrgon 9, . ■ )new •v ! ; 1 % i John Durx ISOM SW. 'Oh I 1 I Portland.aaVr 97L'a i i� I i• / I I al. �.t . 1 f hoe -p Iii i % i j i a.. ax xr CIN S z Choked ox AA *a no.: sSmho ■ ' j •� i II �— ----- SITE PLAN � / / I _OVERALL SUE PLAN F�U 1 SrTE PLAN w . j I 'L' I i i HET 1 . 1 SDR 95-0014/VAR 95-0009 --'RICAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING (P- 1/2 ) 2S113AB-00300 2S113AB-00500 AKERMAN,RICH/WATHEY,JAMES E AKERMAN, RICHARD D& 16G75 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD WATHEY,JAMES E TIGARD OR 97224 16075 SW UPR BOONS FRY RD TIGARD OR 97229 2S113AB-00400 2S112DC-01200 AKERMAN, RICHARD D& AKERMAN, RICHARD D& WATHEY,JAMES E WATHEY,JAMES E 16075 SW UPR BOONS FRY RD BY NW LANDSCAPE INDUSTRIES TIGARD OR 97229 16075 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S112DC-01100 2S113AB-00700 AKERMAN, RICHARD D& B&R INVESTMENTS WATHEY,JAMES E 16255 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD BY NW LANDSCAPE INDUSTRIES TIGARD OR 97224 16075 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S1 12C D-00700 2S 113AB-00900 BOUMAN, DONNA L CASE, DAVID 15940 SW 76TH AVE CASE, DANIEL TIGARD OR 97223 4630 SW 39TH DR PORTLAND OR 97221 2S113AB-00800 2S113BA-00400 DUNCAN,JOHN A AND HAMBACH,HAROLD C&MILDRED M JANICE LEE HAMBACH,MICHAEL V AND 16055 SW 74TH AVE BROWN,LORENE ET AL TIGARD OR 97223 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CD-01000 2S112CD-00800 HAMBACK,HAROLD MILDRED HAVERY,JOHN W MADELON 7735 SW DURHAM RD 15970 SW 76TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S112DC-01400 2S113AB-01500 LOY CLARK PIPELINE CO, INC MT HOOD CHEMICAL CORP 3905 SW 141ST 4444 NW YEON AVE BEAVERTON OR 97005 PORTLAND OR 97210 2S112DC-00201 2S112DC-01300 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P PASTOR,WILLIAM A 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#200-WMI 15930 SW 74TH PORTLAND OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112CD-00900 2S112CD-07400 RIVAS, ERNEST ROSE SAM GOTTER DEVELOPMENT CO 16060 SW 76TH AVE PO BOX 23023 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97281 2Sll3BA-01000 ram EUJJ CEiE?IICAL CCRP. 4444 Nei - PCP:MAW CR 97210 SDR 95-0014/VAR 95-0009 ONCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ( 'e 2/2 ) 2S 112C D-07500 2S 112 DC-01500 .SAM GOTTER DEVELOPMENT CO SCHREINER, ELMER ELLEN PO BOX 23023 15715 SW 74TH AVE TIC!ARD OR 97281 TIGARD OR 97223 ■ 2S 113AB-01000 2S 113AB-00700A1 TROMLEY,RUSSELL F IN:iBJRIAL SUPPLY CD. 1500 OAK TERRACE FO gyp{ 1429 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 ZIALA`IIN CR 97 JGu aN N 16055 SW 7411-i AVENJE TICS CR 97224 - Name of applicant John Duncan Subfect Property: Tax Map and Lot # Tax Map 2S1 13AB, Tax Lot _8 00 Address or General Location 16055 S. W. 74th Avenue. Tigard_ Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, James D. Andrews , do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating interest In a proposed development affecting the land located at 16055 S.W. 74th Avenue , Tigard_ Or, and did on the 9th day of May , 199 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Land Use application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at project site at 74th Avenue (state location on property) This 9th day of May , 19 9 5 w_.A • ... . IP S .• _-� __ . Sigr : ure Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this 2 8- day of June , 19 9 5 �;"« { OFFICIA'.SEAL Not (fkibilt6 or the ate of Oregon (L .-,.<,.i\t Ft ,.,■r7 MF t1 F . N,�T,,:ti mix.; OnErON My Commission Expires: 10-2-9 8 CO:.•F.ISSICid NO.037598 M ;;O:NM "OtJ EXPIRES C(1 02,1998 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 login\jo\postnot.cit AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OI1EGON ) SS CITY OF T1GAI10 ) I, James U. Andrews , being duly sworn, depose and say that on May 9 199 5 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 1 6 n 9 5 s w 7 4th AAL_P —T i rya rri , 0 r gnn , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date Indicate(' above in the United States Post Office at Tigard , Oregon , with postage prepaid thereon. S tit Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 8 •ay of July , 19 9 5 , / .. • ,.s..,,,..,.,,,,.._.,...•-,...—.- n[ ) )'i t..en?t.• • 't' t i-ortErION t ota Public c:,. 'at,10._13T5P9 My Commission Expires: 10-2-98 I:■I COMM' ': i s..'4'i"':5 Ji:i.02,InaF• A A.Aii h:\Iogin\Jo\affmail.cit 2S1 12DC 201 2S1 13AB 900 251 13AB 700 Pacific Realty Associate David Case and Western industrial Supply 15115 S.W. Sequoia Pky Daniel Case P . O. Box 1429 #200-Wm 4630 S.W. 39th Dr. Tualatin , OR 97062 Portland , Oregon 97224 Portland , OR 97221 2S1 12DC 1400 2S1 12DC 201 251 12DC 1300 Loy Clark Pipeline Co. Inc . Catellus Development Corp William Pastor 3905 S.W. 141st Ave . Property Tax Dept . 15930 S .W. 74th Ave . Beaverton , OR 97005 201 Mission St . Tigard , OR 97224 San Francisco, CA 94105 2S1 12 CD 400 2S1 12 DC 1500 2S1 12CD 700 Harvey Knauss Elmer Ellen Schreiner Donna Bouman 14383 S.W. McFarland Blvd . 1571.5 S.W. 74th Ave . 15940 S.W. 76th Ave . Tigard , OR 97224 Tigard , OR 97224 Tigard , OR 97224 2S1 12CD 701 2S1 12CD 500 2S1 12CD 900 Gregory Gene Rose John Schwartz Ernest Rose Rivas Dalena Marie Dials 15900 S .W. 76th Ave. 16060 S .W. 76th Ave . 15950 S.W. 76th Ave . Tigard , OR 97224 Tigard , OR 97224 Tigard , OR 97224 251 13BA 100 2S1 12CD 800 251 12CD 1000 Family Johnson John Madelon Ilavery Harold & Mildred Hamback 200 James St . #407 15970 S.W. 76th Ave . 7735 S.W. Durham Rd . Edmonds , WA 98020 Tigard , OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 2S1 12DC 1200 2S1 13BA 400 2S1 13AB 700 James Wathey Harold & Mildred Hambach Tromley Russell F; Richard Ackerman Michael Hambach DBA TR 16075 S .W. Upper Boones 7735 S.W. Durham Rd. P. O. Box 1429 Ferry Rd . Tigard , OR 97224 Tualatin , OR 97062 Tigard , OR 97224 2S1 13AB 1100 & 1500 251 13AB 200 , 300 , 400 Mt . Hood Chemical Cor 500 p' Rich Akerman Joel Stevens 4444 N.W. Yeon Ave . 9660 S.W. Ventura Ct . Portland , OR 97210 James Wathey 16075 S.W. Upper Boones Portland, Oregon 97223 Ferry Rd . Tigard , OR 97224 leiN LN coHEeT tie PlioNs 1.t/1l(-114b (,00(_) lS X70 Soi -7(9 .741 . Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Duncan Property at S.W. 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon Prepared for Nicoli Engineering and Construction Services, Inc. Prepared by SRI/SHAPIRO, Inc. August 28, 1995 Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Duncan Property at S.W. 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon Prepared For Jim Andrews Nicoll Engineering and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Prepared By Julie Fukuda Dan Cary SRI/SHAPIRO, Inc. 1650 N.W. Front Avenue, Suite 302 Portland, Oregon 97209 SRI/SHAPIRO Project #7955130 August 28, 1995 1.0 INTRODUCTION SRI/SHAPIRO, Inc. was contracted by Nicoli Engineering and Construction Services, Inc. to conduct a wetland delineation on an approximately 6.6-acre property on S.W. 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. The study area is limited to the northern 2.0 acres of the property and is located west of S.W. 74th Avenue, east of Fanno Creek, and north of S.W. Durham Road, in Washington County, Oregon (Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 12) (Figure 1). The proposed development for the site is a two-story warehouse and office, with associated parking at the northern end of the property. Field work was conducted on August 9, 1995. The property includes an open field, a portion of Fanno Creek and its associated floodplain, and moderately sloping to nearly vertical banks. A pond is located in the southern end of the project area. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND SOURCE MATERIALS 2.1 The Federal Manual The primary source document used in our investigation was the "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1 (Environmental Laboratory 1987). This manual is currently recognized by both the Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the delineation of wetlands within Oregon. The 1987 manual provides technical criteria, field indicators, and recommended procedures to be used in determining whether an area is a jurisdictional wetland. The manual requires three technical criteria in undisturbed situations before areas can be considered wetland under federal or state jurisdiction. These criteria are hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Hydric soils are those that have formed exclusively under wet conditions (soils which characteristically have high water tables, soils which are ponded or are frequently flooded, or soils which are otherwise saturated for extended periods during the growing season). Hydrophytic vegetation consists of those plant species that have adapted to growing in substrates which are periodically deficient of oxygen due to saturated soil conditions. Five basic groups of vegetation are recognized based on their frequency of occurrence in wetlands. These categories, referred to as the "wetland indicator status," are as follows: obligate wetland plants (OBL) are estimated to occur almost exclusively in wetlands (>99%); facultative wetland (FACW) plants are estimated to occur 67-99% of the time in wetlands; facultative (FAC) plants occur equally in wetlands and non- wetlands (34-66%); and facultative upland (FACU) plants usually occur in non- wetlands (67-99%). If a species is not assigned to one of the four groups described above it is assumed to be an obligate upland (UPL) plant, which is estimated to occur almost exclusively in non-wetlands (>99%). In addition, plants designated "NI" have not yet received a wetland indicator status, but are probably not obligate upland. 4. / tilWI,,,,:*ZIP!" . e 0 " If i' /\ .1C. ?4q11..7\ 1g Tit \114; 7#it 7 lip ....,_.-- Irtilittrx".11/...14eW:'/A--"MPP- .27e'M it, ( l'''.-7 'AINVIr7:;"-Is:T.•Ipi...,,,,,, le 10,-..." '— %\71 Ir- -----5°‘ 4 ' tt41 - _iL=. 1_, _,. _".III, r7.,./L...01_ ,MPNI.::__--4!"._.11E-AA 11141114,_•-•__ 4tr--_, —-1,145 11 ,littr*::_,,_ _--tii_=____ ' 11,,,v7; PI"-°'"\ ll'alk;._. r \t;:_r__ ,arfor____ 0? ,— - -.-- .:.iii:,:i 1 ....;,_-- .„... ,____________ 1 gym htuN., �J� 1 1 J _ ilf v TLL.1 ,A__-_,f4 _�• F ,f T i.:_7.1)1r1007 liciAirei it. 1r c- ill 1, // .... ..>tk - . ,... dr,j 4 1 41-- \v , _,--___ 1 „" _4 ,11-- 10 AI ./1 bii. • 11 ...R1, , /...."- I I " : 1°°== _ f I i. _ lI Trailef 1 , 1� -f 24 . F.. /I1' �`\:\,I iG o ...,.7- 4/Vil -4--) ,i0-- • \---4 • ._ _. I••��. .. JI ' `,// i r � \ � III r . OI JI �� rd � � i 7 �r y' igh Sc ' 1 �,F_ / I?S - `11, I r ICI i .. \Tri, if ---- :./.4.4,,,,,,v,• Ir.� it-..,2_,, ,",--..„,_�� ''��jjj / ' ,- ���'%/— __• -1,, it f//•ts � - �____— �� _ Ill. ' i�j r �. i •� Q-� rave '�•• �_•$ A I /•O i` � � /���C����T l�jlti',��'J W � •I • • '•sEA� �•�ici,,,, .&--,-- 4 �I i Mile1� � ' r % The 1987 manual defines wetland hydrology as saturation within a major portion of the root zone (usually above 12 inches) typically for at least 12.5% of the growing season. The wetland hydrology criterion can be met, however, if saturation within the major portion of the root zone is present for only 5 percent of the growing season depending on the wetland status of the plant community. The growing season for any given site or location is determined from U.S. Soil Conservation Service data and information. 2.2 Field Methodology Prior to beginning field work, available information and data was compiled and reviewed. A review of soil series boundaries, the U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory map was conducted. These efforts were made to develop a preliminary indication of where potential wetland may exist and to facilitate the on-site gathering of data. Observations of soils, vegetation, and hydrology were made using the "Routine Onsite" method of the manual. One-foot diameter soil pits were excavated to a depth of 18 inches in selected locations. The soil profiles were examined for hydric soils and wetland hydrology field indicators. In addition, a visual percent-cover estimate of the dominant species of the plant community for a 30-foot radius area was performed using soil pit locations as a center of reference. Data were recorded in the field and subsequently transferred to standard wetland delineation data sheets (included in the Appendix). Data were collected for representative sampling locations; however, numerous soil pits were excavated between these data points to verify changes in the three parameters. 3.0 PRESENT SITE CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 Topography The study area is an open field, which has been disturbed by the placement of fill in an arm that extends into the floodplain of Fanno Creek in the northwestern corner of the site. The field continues offsite to the north. At the northwestern corner of the site, Fanno Creek bends sharply to the west in an incised channel. It then flows southward, on the western boundary of the study area, with its forested banks becoming moderately to steeply sloping. In the southern portion of the site, a narrow, earthen berm projects southward within the floodplain of Fanno Creek, separating the creek from a pond which lies to the east of the berm. Elevations within the property boundaries range from approximately 124 feet NGVD at the creek, to 138 feet NGVD at the top of the slopes and the field. 3.2 Hydrology Hydrologic activity on the site is dominated by Fanno Creek which flows along the western site boundary. The creek flows offsite, and eventually into the Tualatin River, approximately 1.5 miles to the south. An old mill pond is located at the southern end Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Duncan Property in Tigard, Oregon Page-2- of the study area. It is separated from Fanno Creek to the west by an earthen berm overgrown with vegetation. Hydrology sources for the pond are precipitation, groundwater, stormwater from a culvert originating along S.W. 74th Avenue, and irregular floodwater from Fanno Creek which enters from a channel offsite to the south. The wetland hydrology criterion was satisfied in the creek and pond areas by direct observation of soils that were saturated at or near the surface. In addition, active oxidized root channels were observed in the upper soil layers. 3.3 Soils Two soil types, Chehalis silty clay loam (mapping unit 9), and Hillsboro loam (mapping unit 21B) have been mapped by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS, 1982) as occurring on the project site (Figure 2). Chehalis silty clay loam may have inclusions of Wapato soils, which are hydric. Chehalis silty clay loam, occasional overflow consists of nearly level, well-drained soils on smooth floodplains. This soil formed in recent alluvium on bottom lands. The surface layer is typically very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) and dark brown (10YR 3/3) silty clay loam to a depth of 16 inches. The upper 7 inches of the subsurface soil is dark brown (10YR 3/3) silty clay loam. Runoff is slow, and permeability is moderate to a depth of 34 inches. Chehalis soils are classified as a fine-silty mixed, mesic, Cumultic Haploxeroll. This soil is mapped on the majority of the site. Hillsboro loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes, is a well-drained soil on broad valley terraces. This soil formed in mixed, silty and loamy, old alluvium. The surface layer is 11 inches deep and dark brown (10YR 3/3) loam. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown (10YR 3/4) loam, and dark-brown (10YR 4/3) heavy loam, about 37 inches thick. Permeability is moderately slow. Hillsboro soils are classified as fine-loamy, mixed, mesic, Ultic Argixeroll. This soil is mapped in a narrow band along the southeastern portion of the site. Soils sampled on the site were primarily comprised of silt loam. Some areas in the floodplain of the Fanno Creek have soils composed of silty sand. The area surrounding the pond has soils composed of thick organic muck. Colors ranged from dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) to very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2), to black (10YR 2/1), with strong brown mottles (7.5YR 3/3) at the edge of the pond and creek to brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 4/3-3/2) in the upland slope areas of the site. At the edge of the pond, soils have a strong odor of hydrogen sulfide, indicating reduced soil conditions. 3.4 Vegetation The study area is dominated by upland grasses and forbs in the field, with forest and emergent wetland vegetation along the creek and edge of the pond. Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Duncan Property in Tigard, Oregon Page-3- I' I pi n` r�1!`. r �i ►" ►..;� a r • 1 . .., ... , i 4... rY , F1, f Wit. ,- r v ;q• s 'i k°• . :37B kL k/ • r 7 G�� •' .�' y :trait__ y J' I({L t ip 1 JE • ,�e`+r.'i" � of x .., 1 f •.• Ari war ,��((�� < 3r�t r,./� .W11(4.41,4'4, }}l,l..''�,``,__,� jj At„.;.' '�r (: A.. '43C: ;�1./ .;vi`y '.YJia * .. )jb. 1 �{1 ':�f. :"Q/. ::'JS1a4..l�l1Vr`u�ilL�kl '� �i f�. . 3 • !{ _ •7►iy � ►�)�; �ptY, o :i c � /4,;..174;,%"- z .,;T � +ib{a e �� :.rt•�' =''�': +,' '�''I � , KA � �' Itp jr �r,.f e J�'..•,1'1__Lf,' 1 .e. ' '.r.: „,1 ,,Lit�� "i.�•': 1 Cr• t .' „A s�°�, `l,, 61 z k.'1i�1� .. t; 4. •-i-• 3- ;taw - °;#, M. t 1 !, \+.� jt fa ► . r �`:�y ,> tt I lia f• �'t`i 7" F• yti ! h: : yv... •4 tin �r F p ,E;r• \ . i`a - t I .a''.I�• ' 4 : :y1 r � *r.t?• .1 ni :n,n, y''"" "-`K - r,. %4,..• �'ft' ( 1 r ti •i, ,. .cF r sir', °l -,�o .7,T ., lc;J a <4 ".. •I 22 ( t,'r r.•1..r X41 J am �,, {k °°,-• ,a.v, !,•"q >�y n ' •. 1 K 15 }i:..i r` •`• } . ,K�'#'fr :,, IMP kS ' �1yy, yy L:t r;,.).•■ ,,,,,r ^ " a7B t, t° 4?':+ .,..�x y ' `J`t.� � `.1:�s '/�, ;,fig' . ' r K' `r kr 1 , ` ��. as'it,,,r,7 A..°7°�;,-1 \``:41�., #.k y..f, ,`. 1F►s : 'r{.. Y` 1 ,• tr,7T�� • H e• .L;' Y M't ■ t .^,c 4 ``:+fit 4•it',c t =► �- S! 7 ? ` 'N1 •t r.. a r+ • ,'- - �, Ls i z s r ' ' 7 �i ` iii'. rj 11 -,/,-.:w4.,.; "'` ". ,"_ ;, 'a;.' !`"�.Y,` ;}?2 , 1. �' g.. , ...,,•�•`� ./,^"`_a`lt£t `?i'• 1,a• c 7,04.1.`p., ,, . . 4 V. 6' !„. 3;A • •,. / 21 `� •,7- If�rk 'y' ° :_,_ , .,,, II; . . 16118 , -—---- %Mk 41 ,'gaff 3�A i� .a \ r i ,, . -e-, eiit .\\: -- ' -30'-.1,,,-k ,, 44.aA r,',Pr:'-„..„''.,.-V: ILis•-, / 40e4.... ri,,1.„1-v1,„...•.f,x A.0._.t A_,R„I,I.y 1 .. . �yy ttk £ t �, ,.z, f f ',' i y, 430 i r y 4 1",•••:7 �� �`�� �t �`<'r�7JFR�/�IV�FZ:' 14,4�:�'?�� � �, �� � �• ti O' �,'- ,,ts � '�-,,,,,i ‘..- ,Yw r v y e rol'•c!`'.!v- Tlt aka s - ,” sk • -,, .-/ 1 1 �;i • f.•.r i c T. ys` =1 stn:1- ?i lC ' 1 . v . > } +.yl• , 1' !'t w` .j, I.Taf1..9 A ,,a i N �r /'`� 4 �r� .3x :fir S 'r•' . ■ ,�'' ' ./r•° , 31 % fir�� :,, is �, ` jyl J' 1 ,,... " 7 .3— . t•0 i `.i;- r/r "/•rKS�$"�'_ 1Y¢ { 1,..4, I.f ' s' *" . tF` �r a= ; I-'7�1.t7., t�� t•,: 4.�.,. I. •i /� 'T''.- VL. ,' AG r gGy+ ""t' �[t: ��a l� ►�t . Rz1,,,. .. .• n� - �(i.J.r it #+" � 1 !a/q ti wry'"' , r,•:§ " �' y1 P ii 3'!A Z1B �o -Al' ,i,"•1 „b.s�rj`j R. r\." ,i s'. n, „i1'F =x. 7955130 8/28/95 Soil mapping units for the property on S.W. 74th Avenue west of the FIGURE Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Tigard, Oregon (Soil n Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon, C 1:20000, 1982). 15 SRI /SHAPIRO I N C O R P O R A T E D Along Fanno Creek and within its floodplain, the dominant tree and shrub species include red alder (Alnus rubra) (FAC), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) (FAC), and Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra) (FACW). Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) (FACU) dominates the woody vine layer. Herbaceous species dominant in this area are redtop (Agrostis alba) (FACW), soft rush (Juncus effusus) (FACW), and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) (FACW). At the edge of the pond, Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana) (FAC) is the dominant tree species. Himalayan blackberry is the dominant woody vine. Dominant herbaceous species include western touch-me-not (Impatiens noli-tangere) (FACW), and reed canarygrass. Other species present are climbing nightshade (Solanum dulcimara) (FAC), and American speedwell (Veronica americana) (OBL). The slopes of Fanno Creek are dominated by red alder, bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) (FACU), and snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) (FACU) in the tree and shrub layer. Himalayan blackberry is the dominant woody vine. Common species in the herbaceous layer include English plantain (Plantago lanceolata) (FAC), reed canarygrass, tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) (FAC), common velvet grass (Holcus lanatus) (FAC), and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) (FACU). The field upslope and east of the creek is vegetated with Himalayan blackberry and weedy herbaceous species such as perennial ryegrass, red clover (Trifolium pratense) (FACU), chicory (Cicorium intybus) (UPL), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) (FACU), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota) (UPL), and cat's ear (Hypochaeris radicata) (UPL). 4.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as part of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) program, has mapped Fanno Creek as a palustrine, forested, broad-leaved/deciduous, saturated/semipermanent/seasonal (PFO1Y) body of water (USFWS, 1981) (Figure 3). This mapping is mostly consistent with SRI/SHAPIRO's field investigation along the creek. However, the old mill pond in the southern end of the study area is not included in the NWI mapping and is more emergent in character. Our investigation of hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation has determined that potentially jurisdictional wetland within the project site is located along Fanno Creek and its floodplain, and adjacent to the pond at the southern boundary of the study area (Figure 4). At the northwestern end of the study area, Fanno Creek flows in an incised bank. In this portion of the site, the potentially jurisdictional wetlands are limited to a narrow fringe along the creek. It should be noted that wetland boundaries determined by SRI/SHAPIRO do not become jurisdictional until the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Division of State Lands review and approve our work. Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Duncan Property in Tigard, Oregon Page-4- :. ' Z ' - ,PFQI,Y O. `0\,,,i °o r`1 ‘�\.�► I lik 2`'• ° Via. aR,5�;m �sNKi' ,4- -FOIYp �9c� I. k`1 •REM \ L, •-, ,,' .1„, - 11 1 I•--- • . T,,_' of ,. •1.,` -__:.- 'WI' � • ' Pe 1.Y• P. t ..a •. , \\ '4 '• • 11 PFOIY i •a Boot �� - I"'F ~— i•. ., •Z , 1 • . BTJ1d1 i ' .• 1, -_.�1. ..... ns..l•a ....,.R,. I,, \ F t Rp r {, .. . ., �� 'f� �}t3c Jr �. 'P IY F � } rr}. � � , \ft f te • r � Q iIY I M ^ 4 µ# .. „ � .- . . •1• POWK x ` 1l t.^ •4t"IX sa r ctc.� p ▪ MIY l •' s Zoe C.' li`12 • _1"'as° a ` 49 R3oW r! ° 'r,„.1..I, 1, ► i 'Zi-a (((,\\�� ; .\t pct a`.ol _()it k'i . .° 44 t �. l� - . ç j • �. ■ � : n� um,, r'�a\ .• 9 •!--rte / .OIY 's-. mil POW Zx tutu, ,/�•' < 1;'.);:1'. • t.. --• , •,e« •FOi1k POWKZx (-- • '' ;t rj (71”" ^ET . c')' Gravel +, t' FOII�?(h li��il% 1' I'1 _. ' - _ f.,��' yL)," 1_• pit •;" :13 ` ; 1:X. ...- • " • a;`,,,0 _t t •.,, ; • n ' ..-eattI• 18 •/u: R2 OW/ PE IV : ! • '1 i• y! +i • • M /. • ,Gr ,t�' (It" W ',., .. PPOIY ti i3 7.' P Q /V' •1a•^' • j� ' DSO Mile t - • :+; ;,;r 1 • .pE.cks RO. • ., d . � 6 f 171 -■ { •'•AE `,f _ii •. .non ''S7-11-11-- ' •i �' I `�� 66 ' Y'� o' S w; CEm ,C•JN YoC�IiB li r a• r.., it – ACIrICI r"!:–..--..74. `, . Pa'R ti 1-1 • • �' �•• • /� pre:1y r 3 '�' P,•WK2x ' ■ v. __. PEMIW E- ,Z° f, .., r 711.\'' ' t~ .: R▪F IY ,pegy.'� ,:r r i-PFOIW/I, f', PEMIYx ° 121 :'. `��I1 • EMIY _„ � ' ��'Rtl�Mi a ���� MI�G j• 1 f'•'.. adt ' SIP PP...t- IY d'. oowK2h i-' PEMIW' -? EMS 1, r -r; pc' —4 t• --"--- ._...•-•••"...u.„PEMIY ;'I ifri ,. ,• Pg. IY$t 'POWZ PEMIY a° 1.I . , liv POWZ R Yd �..:c,•O w—_-._—-1_. �. �. r$A f- �.. F.FL .',,q) � R s_ I •.1 t_r I PFOI'I 7955130 8/28/95 National Wetlands Inventory designations for the property on S.W. 74th FIGURE Avenue west of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Tigard, Oregon (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Beaverton and Lake Oswego, Oregon, 7.5-minute quadrangles, 1:24000, based on 1981 color infrared aerial photography). SRI /SHAPIRO I N C O R P O R A T E D WETLAND BOUNDARY /...... •••■••.i.• • . . . y i 1 '1 1 I O O I ! UPLAND t \ \ \ _ 1....1.‘ AREA t co I t \-17. \ I t \ t \7— IN. OW'. . . . lel I \ I ', • . . . . . . . . Q r'\ r 1•\' ,�, 8 Am,0 / I: ! J1 t .` WETLAND 16 rl I 1 l 1 J 1 I � BOUNDARY AP J j PROX. EDGE I / ® Sample site i OF POND ' /1/ 6.4 J •••:•:• Wetland area 1 i / / ka ii / Nicoli Engineering and Construction Services, Inc., 1995 7955130 8/28/95 9 9 Sample sites and potentially jurisdictional wetland areas identified for the FIGURE 0 75 150 IIII1 I'"'11111111 property on S.W. 74th Avenue west of the Burlington Northern Railroad �I oil I tracks in Tigard, Oregon. �+ FEET NORTH '1I' WiL SRI /SHAPIRO INCORPORATED 5.0 REFERENCES Environmental Laboratory, 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual". Technical Report 4-87-1. Reed, Porter B., Jr. 1988 (May). National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL. NERC-88/18.37. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey, Clackamas County Area, Oregon. November, 1985. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory maps (Lake Oswego, OR, 1:80,000 1981 CIR aerial photography, overlaid on USGS quadrangle). U.S. Geological Survey topographic map (Lake Oswego, OR, 1:24,000, 7.5-minute quadrangle, 1961, photorevised 1984). Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Duncan Property in Tigard, Oregon Page-5 - mO APPENDIX Data Sheets WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM Routine ()mite Method Applicant: NICOLI ENGINEERING Project #: 7955130-01 Date: 08/09/95 County: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 25 Range: 1W Section: 12 Investigator: JF ,DC Sample Site: 1 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Hydric Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL. DRAINED Matrix Color: 1OYR 3/2 )8" Mottles: YES Mottle Color: 7 .5YR 4/6 Hydric Soil Criteria met: YES Comment: 0-8" 1OYR 3/2 Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: " Saturated Soils: YES Depth to Water Table: 13 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: YES Wetland Hydrology Criteria met; YES Comment: SOIL SATURATED AT 6" Vegetation Type Dominant Species FWS Status Stratum Overall Sapling/Shrub CALI.X SCDCILEPIANA FAC 100% 25% 70% Herb IMPATIENS NOLI-TANGERE FACW 10% Herb PHALARIS OUNDINACEA FACW 80% Herb SOLANUM DULCAMARA FAC+ 10%Woody Vine PUBUS DISCOLOR FACU 100% 5 Percentage of dominant (>r 20%) species that are FAC, FACW or OPAL: 67% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: YES comment: Determination: Wetland fComment �I �( �" WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ". Routine Onsite Method Applicant: NICOLI ENGINEERING Project #: 7955130-02 Date: 08/09/95 County: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Investigator: JF ,DC Sample Site: 2 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Hydric Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL DRAINED Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 0-18" Mottles: NO Hydric Soil Criteria met: YES comment: STRONG H2S ODOR; ORGANIC MUCK 2 ' DEEP Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: " Saturated Soils: YES Depth to Water Table: 0 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: NO Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: YES comment: SOIL SATURATED TO SURFACE Vegetation Type Dominant Species FWS Status Stratum Overall Herb IMPATIENS NOLI-TANGERE FACW 40% Herb PNALARIS ARUNDINACEA FACW 50% Herb VERONICA AMERICANA OBL 10% 90% Woody Vine RUBUS DISCOLOR FACU 100% 10% Percentage of dominant (>- 20'.) species that are FAC, FACW or DEL: 67% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: YES Comment: Determination : Wetland Comment: WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM SRI/SHAPIRO Routine Onsite Method Applicant: NICOLI ENGINEERING County: WASHINGTON State: OR TOWojnsechipt:$2: 57955130-03 Date: 08/09/95 Range: 1W section: 12 Investigator: JF ,DC Sample site: 3 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Hydric Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL DRAINED Matrix Color: 7 .5YR 3/3 0-18 Mottles: NO Hydric Soil Criteria met: NO Comment: SILT LOAM Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: " Saturated Soils: NO Depth to Water Table: > 18 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: NO Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: NO Comment: 1 Vegetation Type Dominant Species FWS Status Stratum Overall Herb DAUCUS CAROTA UPL 15% Herb FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA FAC- 25% Herb HYPOCHAERIS RADICATA UPL 5% Herb LOLIUM PERENNE FACU 25% Herb PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA FACW 10% Herb PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA FAC 20% 90% Woody Vine RUBUS DISCOLOR FACU 100% 10% Percentage of dominant (>= 20%) species that are FAG, FACW or OBL: 25% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: NO Comment: .. . .. , Determination: Non-Wetland Comment: WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM 1.,;,:3011:" 'M'"- ° ' f•.)...r R Routine Onsite Method Applicant: NICOLI ENGINEERING Project #: 7955130-04 Date: 08/09/95 County: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Investigator: JF ,DC Sample Site: 4 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Fiydric Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL DRAINED Matrix Color: 10YR 4/2 0-18 " Mottles: YES Mottle Color: 5YR 4/6 Hydric Soil Criteria met: YES Comment: Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: Saturated Soils: NO Depth to Water Table: > 18 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: YES Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: YES Comment: IN FLOOD PLAIN OF FANNO CREEK Vegetation � I Type Dominant Species FWS Status Stratum Overall Sapling/Shrub ALNUS PUBRA FAC 40% Sapling/Shrub POPULUS TRICHOCARPA FAC 20% Sapling/Shrub SALIX LASIANDRA FACW+ 40% 45% Herb PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA FACW 100% 50% Woody Vine PUBUS DISCOLOR FACU 100% 5% Percentage of dominant (>= 20%) species that are FAC, FACW or OeL: 80% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: YES Comment: Determination : Wetland 1 Comment: YpN �1") InY WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ": °�" I !�)16..,. °I Routine Onsito Method Applicant: NICOLI ENGINEERING Project 1: 7955130-05 Date: 08/09/95 County: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Investigator: JF ,DC Sample Site: 5 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Hydric Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL DRAINED Matrix Color: 10YR 4/2 0-18 " Mottles: YES Mottle Color: 10YR 4/6 Hydric Soil Criteria met: YES Comment: SILTY SAND Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: Saturated Soils: NO Depth to Water Table: > 18 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: YES Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: YES Comment: DRIFT LINES AND MATTED VEGETATION Vegetation Type Dominant Species FWS Status I . Stratum I Overall Tree AL NUS RUBRA FAC 10% Tree POPULUS TRICHOCARPA FAC 50% Tree SAL IX LASIANDRA FACW+ 40% 40% Herb AGROSTIS ALBA FACW 30% Herb CAREX DEWEYANA FAC+ 5% Herb EPILOBIUM WATSONII FACW-- 10% Herb HOLCUS LANATUS FAC 5% Herb JUNCUS EF,EUSUS FACW 20% Herb PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA FACW 30% 40% Woody Vine RUBUS DISCOLOR FACU 100% 20% Percentage of dominant (>= 20'.) species that are FAC, FACW or QPL.: 83% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: YES Comment: Determination: Wetland Comment: — r I SR ��yy LL � � �y y WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM Routine Onsite Method Applicant: NICOLI ENGINEERING Project 4: 7955130-06 Date: 08/09/95 county: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 25 Range: 1W Section: 12 Investigator: J F ,DC Sample Site: 6 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Hydric Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL DRAINED Matrix color: 10YR 3/3 0-18 " II Mottles: NO Hydric Soil Criteria met: NO comment: SILT LOAM FILL WITH CONCRETE CHUNKS 4 Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: Saturated Soils: NO Depth to Water Table: ) 1 8 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: NO Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: NO Comment: Vegetation Type f Dominant Species FWS Status Stratum Overall 1 I Tree ACER MACROPHYLLUM FACU 100% 20% Sapling/Shrub SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS FACU 100% 5% Herb AGROSTIS ALBA FACW 15% Herb FES TUCA ARUNDINACEA FAC- 20% Herb HOLCUS LANATUS FAC 20% Herb LAPSANA COMMUNIS UPL 5% Herb LOLIUM PERENNE FACU 20% Herb PHALARIS ARLINDINACEA FACW 15% Herb TRIFOLIUM PRA TENSE FACU 5% 70% Woody Vine RUBUS DISCOLOR FACU 100% 5% Percentage of dominant (>= 20%) species that are FAC, FACW or OBI..: 17% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: NO Comment: Determination : Non-Wetland Comment: WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ����'� f:������� ����� ~-m����u° ,~�N N0-��- ��0`��� Routine Onsite Method ___...__.���� *ovzican : NIC0LZ ENGINEERING Project 1: 7955130-07 Date: 08/09/95 County: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 25 Range: 1W section: 12 Investigator: JF ,DC Sample Site: 7 ____ __ Soils ^' --'-- Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Hydric Soils List: NO Drainage class: WELL DRAINED matrix color: 1OYR 3/3 0-18" tiotaes: NO *'uric Soil Criteria met: NO Comment: SILT LOAM Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: " Saturated Soils: NO Depth to Water Table: >18 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: NO Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: NO Comment: Vegetation Type 1 Dominant Species / FWS Status Stratum Overall ^ ' . Tree ALNUS R(&7RA FAC 100% 30% Herb PHALARIS ARLVVDINACE4 FACW 100% 50% Woody Vine R09L/S DISCOLOR FACU 100% 20% Percentage of dominant (>= zoA> species that are FAC, FACW or mBL` 67% nvurow»vtio Vegetation Criteria met: YES Comment: |/ Determination: Non-Wetland 1 comment: WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ����,� ����������'����� ~��`���.� ~.�m mm mm- ��m`��� Routine Onsite Method _ pwnlicunt: NICOLI ENGINEERING Project #: 7955130-08 Date: 08/09/95 county: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Investigator: JF ,DC Sample Site: 8 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On *xu,io Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL DRAINED Matrix Color: 1OYR 3/2 0-18" mottles: NO Hydric Soil Criteria met: NO comment: SILT LOAM Hydrology Inundated; NO Depth: " Saturated Soils: NO Depth to water Table: > 18 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: NO Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: NO Comment: Vegetation \ / Type 1 Dominant Species FWS Status Stratum Overall / Herb C IRS I0Y AR VENSE FACU+ 3% Herb COVVOLVLLUS AR YENS'IS UPL 5% Herb QAUCU6 CAR07A UPL 2% Herb FES7LC4 ARUNDIAACE4 FAC- 15% Herb HULC(/6 L ANA TUS FAC 35% Herb L0L PERENNE FACU 25% Herb RUMEX CRISPUS FAC+ 15% 80% Woody Vine RL09L/S DISCOLOR FACU 108% 20% Percentage of dominant (>= ao%) species that are FAC, FACW or ooL: 33% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: NO Comment: Determination: Non-Wetland � WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM SR1 .IL I- mp° mr °L Routine Onsite Method Applicant: NICOLI ENGINEERING Project #: 7955130-09 Date: 08/09/95 County: WASHINGTON State: OR Township: 25 Range: 1W Section: 12 Investigator: J F ,D C Sample Site: 9 Soils Mapped Series and Phase: CHEHALIS SILTY CLAY LOAM On Hydric Soils List: NO Drainage Class: WELL DRAINED Matrix Color: 10YR 4/3 0-18 " Mottles: NO Hydric Soil Criteria met: NO Comment: SILT LOAM Hydrology Inundated: NO Depth: " Saturated Soils: NO Depth to Water Table: > 18 Active Oxidized Rhizospheres Present: NO Wetland Hydrology Criteria met: NO Comment: Vegetation Type Dominant Species -� FWS Status Stratum Overall - --- Herb CICHORIUM INTYBUS UPL 10% Herb CIRSIUM ARVENSE FACU+ 10% Herb DAUCLIS CAROTA UPL 10% Herb HYPOCHAERIS RAOICATA UPL 10% Herb LACTUCA SERRIOLA FACU 10% Herb LAPSANA COMMUNIS UPL 3% Herb L OL I LIM PERENNE FACU 2 0% Herb PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA FAC 5% Herb RUMEX CRISPUS FAC+ 2% Herb TARAXACUM OFFICINALE FACU 5% Herb TRIFOLILIM PRATENSE FACU 15% 100% Percentage of dominant (>= 20%) species that are FAC, FACW or ODL: 0% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criteria met: NO Comment: Determination: , Non-Wetland Comment: 13 \` - II / // Lk...A_A.23 7 / : At ' .•� /d!� 127.3 1 , �/ ' •-ol A 0/ v //Q. t 1 x 14 5.0 I f , � PAVED 1114 1.1P 1)) 1tiS 'i / PARKING ' Y el �I/� A .* CBs � - 3t'40 `� ♦ • H h a . x136.7 �. m/ X142,5 �� X143.2 � 1_ /416‘P # CB te °lie, ♦- / 140.9 Cro..44 X 14 4.5 •� / 6) $11' \,,t,so / />/)O� PAVED * PA CB. PARKING / LsJ 142.3 ► 07.4/ 146.9 /N.641,000 x tr, X �. p a CB \�...,, 0:00000.<7.- ©©�© © 141.8 ' > � CB � � , • 0 re h'� c8.141.1 ,;:.%`• O\� I SX.9 Q qtr . .. O �. /J II G �� . `� � � / :CB PA ED as,15, -a ( %,...... S Q C � �� 1X4.3 sai X 144.2 r� 06.4"♦ �r 140.2 0 �� H ��� �i E►..rx CB 1 i - (1141111111111111111111111 9( 1 s Q CB ® ` 1‘.. x136.8 Q .4•••, SI' .f. : B ■, ,iii, 0 . �� J X 15 0.1 se 68 ti. - ''' D$4..,/46.9 / / X = , \ 15x2.5,\....j...„,,,....,,5: \ T �©© or 1 /' x l 51.3 , \\ `~j� � � PAVED PARKING tr ` .2 X153.1 irr y6�151.8 1,1°I .`■ V ,° ito\gr a � 4.4 153.6 h iiik .. 4", ti,,,,,p, 154.1 ti ,; C:ItIc % I54.IO r 157.6 IL 154.4 0 _ 111101' ,� -"V trj 'v O + °CB pC8 r4 //�� �� O X156.- tip : :ljj1 "�� p• Or t� O oI I x 154.7 ��. _�; X 167. 5 I�� ; t '4'$1'th it Itg•" r QQ O W oo x 15 7.5 I oj ____,� - 0 o p p 0 / 154.6 �X O ,i'167.1 I x . ' , ' ° o X156.8 `∎. ■ X149.0 .-■44 ii 0 y ellidil- 167.5X �- \� P O 1/' r--r 4 d 64 0.000 I p 1 ° X154.9 Q i 1 ,/". Iiiii D� In 0° OD /J _ _ _ _ _ "7"- "7. !"'"•,'-"'-1 I k 11 J V" 11G and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086.FAX (503) 684-3636 June 27, 1995 City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: John Duncan Project VARIANCE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 15'-0" setback from 74th Avenue versus the 35'-0" set back requirement as required by the City of Tigard Community Development code. We believe that the existing site conditions warrant the approval of this request, and submit the following comments responding to the criteria required for the granting of a variance. (Tigard C.D.C. 18.134.050) . 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The development is in compliance with the comprehensive plan and other applicable policies and standards. The requested variance will not be materially detrimental to adjacent properties. The existing Jadco Chemical facility has a setback of approximately 20'-0" from 74th Avenue, and having the new building setback at 15'-0" will provide some continuity between the two structures. With the railroad east of 74th, the purpose of the setback requirements (i.e. light, air, vision, etc. ) will still be maintained. Since 74th is considered a local street and additional right-of-way has already been dedicated, the possibility of the street width or designation changing seems improbable. Variance Request June 27, 1995 Page 2 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The project site is bordered by Fanno Creek to the south and west and by 74th to the east. At this particular location the street adjusts its alignment and Fanno Creek floodplain broadens out, which severely restricts the amount of developable land. The applicant is not proposing to fill any of the existing floodplain or low lands adjacent to the project in order to maintain the existing natural habitat, but is asking that the buffer dimension be decreased in order to preserve the existing natural conditions of the site. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The economics of the project determined the square footage of the proposed structure. In order to achieve the necessary building size, the applicant had two choices; fill portions of the site or adjust the setback requirements from 74th Avenue. With the adjusted 15'-0" setback, a buffer/setback area of 1,433 square feet will still be maintained along 74th Avenue. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; The variance is being requested in order to preserve the existing physical and natural features. The applicant has made a conscious effort to maintain and enhance the existing natural features of the site. The applicant believes that it is more important to preserve the unique features of the site than to provide a 35'-0" buffer from 74th, the railroad tracks and the "service/back" yards of the adjacent commercial uses. 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is imposed upon this site by the unique natural features of the Fanno Creek basin. By allowing this variance, the hardship created by Fanno Creek can be alleviated and allow the applicant to develop the property in the most economically feasible way. Variance Request June 27, 1995 Page 3 If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me. Sincerely, (7::t„„DPCALLk.g.„,4„_/ James D. Andrews, Project Manager JDA:mlh P 01 RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 171995 August 16, 1995 Attention: Mark Roberts City of Tigard Fax #684-7297 Dear Mark: Please waive the 120-day permit processing time limit in order that we may prepare the necessary wetlands delineation study. If you have any questions, please contact me at 684-0044. Thank you. Sincerely, PJ:i410 A. Duncan P 01 RECEIVED PLIONG 0 API' JUL 2 41995 jade0 JULY 21, 1995 �F�� PHONE: (503) 684-0044 FAX 0: (503) 624-2723 CHEMICAL LTD. 16065 S.W.74M AVENUE PORTLAND.OR 97224 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S) TO: ATTENTION MARK ROBERT'S COMPANY CITY OF TIGARD FROM JOIN A. DUNCAN TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES BEING TRANSMITTED — INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE ARE: 2 . COMMENTS s I July 21, 1995 I City of Tigard Attn: Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Duncan Property Site Development Review Request for Delineation Report near mark: I am writing in res rOse to the City of Tigard's revieof the Duncan property site development submittal. Concerning the requested wetlands delineation, I am not proposing to develop within the one hundred year flood plain, natural drainage ways, or wetlands area. Are developments near sensitive lands typically required to submit delineation reports? Since I have purposely chosen not to encroach into the "sensitive lands area," I do not see a purpose for a delineation report, nor do I wish to incur the added costs such a report would create. Thank you for your time in considering my request to continue without a delineation report. Sincere) , n A. Duncan 1011111111111111■■ ■11.x. 11 III P11 I H and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784-Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 December 1, 1995 City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: John Duncan Project VARIANCE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 15'-0" setback from 74th Avenue versus the 20'-0" set back as required by the City of Tigard Community Development code. We believe that the existing site conditions warrant the approval of this request, and submit the following comments responding to the criteria required for the granting of a variance. (Tigard C.D.C. 18.134.050). 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The development is in compliance with the comprehensive plan and other applicable policies and standards. The requested variance will not be materially detrimental to adjacent properties. The existing Jadco Chemical facility has a setback of approximately 15'-0" from 74th Avenue, and having the new building setback at 15'-0" Variance Request June 27, 1995 Page 2 will provide continuity between the two structures on the site. With the 100'-0" combined rigth of way of 74th Avenue and Burlington Northern Railroad, the intent of the setback requirements ( i.e., light, air, vision, etc. ) are still maintained. Since 74th is considered a local street and additional right-of-way has already been dedicated and improved, the variance request will not interfere with any future improvements along 74th Avenue. 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The project site is bordered by Fanno Creek to the west and by 74th Avenue to the east. At this particular location the street adjusts its alignment and the Fanno Creek floodplain broadens out, which severely restricts the amount of developable land. Approximately one half of the 6.64 Acres is within the floodplain or contains wetlands, leaving the majority of the site open and undevelopable. The applicant is not proposing to fill any of the existing floodplain or low lands adjacent to the project in order to maintain the existing natural habitat, but is asking that the side yard dimension be decreased in order to preserve the existing natural conditions of the site. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; When the site was originally purchased, many of todays restrictions regarding wetlands and flood plain areas were not adopted. With todays requirements, over one half of the site is undevelopable. Besides the wetlands and flood plain areas, both of the right of ways of 74th Avenue and Durham Road have been increased. An additional 5 foot strip ( 3055 square feet ) of developable land was required to be dedicated when the applicant improved 74th Avenue at the applicants expense. With the expansion of Durham Road additonal right of way dedication ( 12,782 square feet ) is being required. United Sewerage Agency has an existing 12 foot wide easement Which bisects the property, thus placing another restriction on the site. With the majority of the site being restricted, the applicant is requesting the variance in order to economically use the remaining developable portion of the site. i Variance Request June 27, 1995 Page 3 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; The variance is being requested in order to preserve the existing physical and natural 1 features. The applicant has made a conscious effort to maintain and enhance the existing natural features of the site. The applicant believes that it is more important to preserve the unique features of the site than to provide a 20'-0" buffer from 74th, the railroad tracks and the "service/back" yards of the adjacent commercial uses. 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is imposed upon this site by the unique natural features of the Fanno Creek basin and the street right of way dedications. By allowing this variance, the hardship created by Fanno Creek, the wetlands and associated buffer zones, and the additional right of way requirements, can be alleviated and allow the applicant to develop the property in the most economically feasible way. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews, Project Manager J DA:mlh 1 Memorandum DATE: December 4, 1995 TO: Deniece Won, Hearings Officer FROM: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner eye RE: Duncan Front Yard Setback Variance The applicant requested that the Public Hearing be kept open for seven days concerning Site Development Review 95-0014, Sensitive Lands Review 95-0010 and Variance 95- 0009. During the Public Hearing the applicant had asked that Hearings Officer review findings prepared for the variance and make a recommendation. The applicant has requested a five foot variance to the 20 foot corner sideyard setback requirement of the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Section 18.134.050 allows a variance to a development standard to be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on the following findings: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The applicant applied for the variance because it appeared initially that the front yard setback of 35 feet would be required to be maintained from SW 74th Avenue. Because the parcel is a corner lot and two property frontages which each exceed 75 feet in length the applicant can choose which frontage to consider to be the front yard. The applicant states that SW Durham Road should be considered the front yard setback. This type of variance has not been granted to other properties within the immediate vicinity of the site as much of SW 74th Avenue is presently undeveloped. The applicant's existing Jadco Chemical Building on the same parcel complies with the 20 foot setback requirement as indicated on the site plan. 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size, shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The site has 100-year flood plain and wetlands areas which limit development of the property. However, each of the properties along SW 74th Avenue have similar constraints. Upon further review it appears that more than half of the proposed building would if developed meet or exceed the 20 foot setback requirement. For the remainder of the building to comply with the 20 foot setback requirement would appear to require slight modifications to the site plan which may not entail the loss of building square footage. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The use will be the same as permitted by this title. Because the majority of the structure has been designed to comply with the 20 foot front yard setback the variance does not appear warranted in that the remainder of the structure can apparently be redesigned to meet the setback requirement through slight adjustments to the site plan. Because of the limited area involved it also appears that applicant may be able to make these adjustments with no net loss of building square footage. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The applicant has requested up to a five foot setback variance for less than one- half of the 60 foot width of the front portion of the structure. Due to its limited nature substantial impacts are not expected to any of the physical and natural systems listed in this criteria. 5. The hardship is not self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship appears self imposed in that the majority of the proposed building meets the setback standard and slight adjustments would be required for the remainder of the building to comply. The existing structure on the same site was developed in compliance with the 20 foot setback requirements and had similar constraints as those which face development of the proposed structure. Based on the preceding findings staff recommends that the Hearings Officer deny the variance. The applicants proposed findings are attached should you find that the variance is warranted. •••N •111 •JIhJL ' jIF4H T s I 1 I NI 11 , !0 and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784-Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503)684-3636 June 27, 1995 City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: John Duncan Project VARIANCE REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 15'-0" setback from 74th Avenue versus the 35'-0" set back requirement as required by the City of Tigard Community Development code. We believe that the existing site conditions warrant the approval of this request, and submit the following comments responding to the criteria required for the granting of a variance. (Tigard C.D.C. 18.134.050). 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; - The development is in compliance with the comprehensive plan and other applicable policies and standards. The requested variance will not be materially detrimental to adjacent properties. The existing Jadco Chemical facility has a setback of approximately_20'-0" from 74th Avenue, and having the new building setback at 15'-0" will provide some continuity between the two structures. With the railroad east of 74th, the purpose of the setback requirements (i.e. light, air, vision, etc. ) will still be maintained. Since 74th is considered a local street and additional right-of-way has already been dedicated, the possibility of the street width or designation changing seems improbable. C C Variance Request June 27, 1995 Page 2 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The project site is bordered by Fanno Creek to the south and west and by 74th to the east. At this particular location the street adjusts its alignment and Fanno Creek floodplain broadens out, which severely restricts the amount of developable land. The applicant is not proposing to fill any of the existing floodplain or low lands adjacent to the project in order to maintain the existing natural habitat, but is asking that the buffer dimension be decreased in order to preserve the existing natural conditions of the site. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The economics of the project determined the square footage of the proposed structure. In order to achieve the necessary building size, the applicant had two choices; fill portions of the site or adjust the setback requirements from 74th Avenue. With the adjusted 15'-0" setback, a buffer/setback area of 1,433 square feet will still be maintained along 74th Avenue. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; The variance is being requested in order to preserve the existing physical and natural features. The applicant has made a conscious effort to maintain and enhance the existing natural features of the site. The applicant believes that it is more important to preserve the unique features of the site than to provide a 35'-0" buffer from 74th, the railroad tracks and the "service/back" yards of the adjacent commercial uses. 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is imposed upon this site by the unique natural features of the Fanno Creek basin. By allowing this variance, the hardship created by Fanno Creek can be alleviated and allow the applicant to develop the property in the most economically feasible way. G Cl Variance Request June 27, 1995 Page 3 If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call me. Sincerely, 1 /61"1/4'142- 621'""4-4- • James D. Andrews, Project Manager JDA:mlh 1 1 1 1 Tr 1 ► OLI NQINEER1NG and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 January 5, 1996 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: JOHN DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 16055 SW 74TH, TIGARD, OR 97224 r SDR 95-0014 SLR 95-0010 Ie JOB NO. 950110 Dear Mark: Please find enclosed a revised Site and Landscape Plan (Revision Date 1/5/96) . In response to your Site Development Report, I note the following: (Our numbered items correspond to your staff report. ) 6. The street crossing has been removed. The width of the driveways has been revised to meet City standards (30'-0") and the driveways have been consolidated so there is a maximum of three driveways. The 100-year flood plain has been noted on Sheet 1. 1. (-kve 6 ceect v€.0∎ QuJ ea-6A co 14.414►c+, (,t2 s asS ,�eGf' +e reLAet-.' . J 9. a. Applicant understands that they shall obtain all necessary permits. T Ind( . Cory �prjor~tQ rsci.cakt« O� 13& . b. The Site Plan has been revised to show an additional handi- capped accessible parking space adjacent to the existing Jadco chemical building. o/C c. The franchise hauler has approved the revised Site Plan and a letter of approval has been enclosed. The enclosure has been enlarged per the franchise hauler's request. o f- d. The applicant agrees to negotiate with the City and enter into an agreement or contract with the City regarding the 15'-0" easement for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway. Oh( *e. Three additional pole lights have been added to the site. Two additional pole lights have been added to the parking area on the Burlington Northern property. An additional pole light has been added to the parking lot west of the office. *(1) The surface-mounted light above the garage doors is to a • Mr. Mark Roberts John Duncan Industrial Bldg. SDR 95-0014 SLR 95-0010 January 5, 1996 Page 2 be left on during the night for security lighting. There are two security lights located at the roof soffits above the north and south doors of office #1. The additional lights should provide the adequate security lighting for the Project. 01C f. The applicant is in the process of removing the barrels from the storage area near the existiig Jadco chemical building. 1-4aL,+- b.eelA 4ai# a.S a-l 41‘49- - w ee C, g. An agreement with Burlington Northern has been enclosed. 04:1 h. Understood. G IC i. The building has been adjusted to provide a 20'-0" setback from SW 74th Avenue. o k. If there are any items which I have overlooked or are unclear, please feel free to call. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:jr Enclosures: Revised Site & Landscape Plan Letter of Approval from hauler Agreement with Burlington Northern p *R * I * D * E DISPOSAL. COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 (503)625-6177 January 12, 1996 To; Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering Service Inc. Subject: Duncan Project Enclosure Approval Fax on 1-12-96 If enclosure is constructed as shown in this fax, 10' wide x 17' long it will meet Pride Disposal Companys equipment needs. Thank You, Lenny Hing, Service Manager �� Printed on 100% recycled paper. 01/12/96 11! 46 $803 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. ,InC •-. PRIDE: DISPOSAL X002 A 1 M 1. ' l \ b . b.4 t1 all \1.Ili Illair 1 \ \ SF. .- �.-. .- •:A . 932 8F_ ' „•_. . • 1 1 a 932 SF_ • - ... N1rt11 5' • - - k 1 SIDE K 0A s 1813 SP. E LECTRIGAL — • 1 AREA • 1b13 Sr- TRAITOR"rER • •`. . •-. - -� t 1 t• . - l l D 10'x{.7' . , • • i_ t • TER LOGATION 1 • STRIMI AGCEbb -- — -.1.11 1 E.D. PAVE ..z- - TO 81-4T. 0.1 U -M :. -$. OFFICE _ YCLE ~ •- 6,...e...,-..% �' AREA - -flOY) P- . - - - ` Ha PARKI v(44 r, 7 AIL an munnum ip- 41 11011 1 �` MANNQLL 1 EXT'G 1 \ _ �1t 1 p1t 1l }" G C.'�,TCN eAsrN s SEE VG-1) EXT'G FIRS G i HYDRANT . Iii 0_0. EXT'G N1`t1! C+ONC s * li PARKING aPFROAGN I 1 f F�r1OvE �XTYs G 1 `.`N pt 5IDEUTALK.? .. ` 4 ` \\ szE 4/C-I i■ I 1 24'-0. � �- �J � LAN P'N\N\ \ , I A _ - c - _ a fi �' ,43 : •-a N 1 2 i— I DUPLICA[E No. 247,122 INDEFINITE TEHM LEASE THIS LEASE made this 1st day of August , 19 84 ,between BURLINGTON NORTHERN (OREGON-WASHINGTON) INC., an Oregon corporation, hereinafter called "Lessor", and JOHN A. DUNCAN, doing business as JADCO CHEMICAL LTD., whose post office address is 16055 S.W. 14th, Tigard, Oregon 97223 ,hereinafter called "Lessee", WITNESSETH: In consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained to be kept and performed by Lessee, Lessor hereby leases to Lessee upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth the following described premises situate in the City of Durham , County of Washington State of Oregon All that part of the premises of the said Lessor as shown outlined red on the print hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A" dated July 16, 1984, and made a part hereof. SAVING AND RESERVING to Lessor, its successors and assigns, the right to construct, maintain and operate a railroad track or tracks or to construct,maintain and use or permit others to construct,maintain and use buildings or other structures for railroad purposes located or to be located upon any part of the above-described premises not occupied by the buildings and structures hereinafter mentioned; to construct, maintain and use or permit to be constructed, maintained and used by others any existing or additional pipe, telephone, telegraph or power transmission line, or water or sewer system,or other such facilities,over,on or beneath the said premises;to make any change in grade or location of its railroad or any of its tracks,or to rearrange its station facilities,or to use the said premises or any part thereof for railroad purposes; to allow t''e placement of signs and signboards for commercial or other purposes upon the leased premises so long as the placement of such signs or signboards does not interfere with the operation of Lessee's business on said premises;and further saving and reserving to Lessor or its agent the right to enter thereon for any one or more of such purposes without payment to Lessee of any sum for damage of any nature which may be caused thereby. Lessee hereby leases said premises from Lessor for the indefinite term hereof subject to the covenants and promises following,which Lessee agrees to observe arid perform, to-wit: 1. Lessee shall use and occupy said premises for the sole and exclusive purpose of constructing, maintaining,and operating thereon an employee parking area. No other buildings, structures, additions, alterations or improvements shall be erected or made on the premises by Lessee or at the direction of Lessee, save with the express permission of Lessor in writing and at the sole cost of Lessee. orm60013 11.7Y 1 1 N as 18. Nothing herein contained shall imply or import a covenant on the part of Lessor for quiet enjoyment. 19. Lessee accepts the leased premises subject to any and all existing permits, licenses, leases, easements, railroad facilities, pipelines, telephone, telegraph, communication, power and signal lines or any other similar facilities, together with any future installations thereof provided such future installations do not unreasonably interfere with Lessee's use of the leased premises. • 20. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this lease shall not affect or impair any other provision. Subject to the foregoing provisions, this lease and all of the covenants and promises thereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their executors, administrators, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this lease, in duplicate, the day and year first hereinabove written. BURLINGTON NORTHERN (OREGON-WASHINGTON) INC. In Presence of: $�„ anager Leases f \ JOH A 'U CAN, doi ,usiness as JADCO CHEMICAL LTD. MEMORANDUM A'►I "Hp ��l I ��I CITY OF TIGARD TO: Jim Hendryx, Dick Bewersdorf and Brian Rager FROM: Greg Berry DATE: April 1, 1996 SUBJECT: SDR 95-14 (Duncan) From our discussion I understand the applicant is asserting that the requirement of Condition #3 to install a curb along the east frontage of the property does not require additional paving along the newly installed curb. I understand the applicant has been told that the additional paving is required unless there is a successful appeal of that decision. If the applicant intends to appeal the Director's Decision of the interpretation of the Condition, the appeal would be to the Planning Commission in accordance with the CDC at 18.32.090.A. If the applicant is appealing the City Engineer's decision of Design Standards, the appeal would be to the City Administrator. In either case, I would urge the paving be required since it is integral to the curb as shown on the adopted standard construction drawings. Moreover, the purpose of the curb is to replace drainage that is currently provided by ditches. This cannot be accomplished unless paving is installed. Further, leaving gravel between the existing paving and the new curb, as applicant is proposing, would also create an unsafe driving condition as the traveled way would be partially paved and partially graveled. The applicant's engineer should understand that he will be expected to provide drawings of the proposed street improvements and any design including curbs without paving will be his alone to justify. i:\eng\greg\dun.doc { y. -rte E G1NEE -N V .- and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 April 23, 1996 Dick Brewersdorf Mark Roberts Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: John Duncan Building Job#95-0110 SDR- 95-0014 SLR- 95-0010 BUP -95-0507 Dear Gentlemen: Due to the interpretation of the staff report regarding the level of improvements along 74th Avenue, Mr. Duncan has decided to locate his required additional parking to the south of the existing JADCO Chemical Building. I understand that this modification can be administered at the staff level as a minor modification. We are in the process of preparing the necessary documents and obtaining required reports for the approval of this modification. If there are any additional City requirements please let me know as soon as possible. The interpretation has caused a severe delay and an economic hardship to Mr. Duncan. We are asking that because of this delay and hardship that the minor modification be contingent to the final occupancy. What we are requesting at this time is a new condition requiring revised drawings to be submitted showing the new parking lot location. The completion of the parking lot along with any other conditions be completed prior to final occupancy. This would allow Mr. Duncan to obtain his permit and begin his building project while the required documents and reports are being prepared, submitted and approved by the City of Tigard for the minor modification. April 23, 1996 City of Tigard Mark Roberts Dick Brewersdorf As you are aware, there was a difference of opinion regarding the interpretation of the staff report. Specifically the installation of the curb versus half street improvements along the east side of 74th Avenue. On behalf of the applicant I am requesting that the hearings officer respond in writing to the interpretation of the curb requirements as noted in the staff report, and it's interpretation as a half street improvement. If you have any further questions or comments please feel free to call me. Sincerely, .ie.,...v.-4-4-7-C1) 0.-y...).(A.A.LAA-4.--4 James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:jh • _ _ &NtCo1 - E GINEERI G , and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 April 22, 1996 Mark Roberts Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: John Duncan Building Job#96-0110 SDR- 95-0014 SLR-95-0010 BUP -95-0507 Dear Mark: For your information please find enclosed documents from the Division of State Lands and the Corp of Engineers regarding the installation of the 5 inch sanitary sewer line in the flood plain and wet land area. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, cievvvvz.a...7T-7 an"CLEA-J-4-Az---- James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:jh Oregon March 25 , 1996 DS J DIVISION OF John Duncan 16055 SW 74th Avenue STATE LANDS Tigard OR 97224 STATE LAND BOARD JOHN A. KITZIIABER Governor RE: State File No . 10622 PHIL KEISLING Fanno Creek -- Sanitary Sewer Line SecretarvofState JIM HILL State Treasurer Dear Mr . Duncan' 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310-1337 (503) 378-3805 We have received your application to install a 5" sanitaryFAx (503) 378_4844 sewer line to an existing manhole within Fanno Creek. TheTTY (503) 378-4615 Division of State Lands requires a permit if you plan to remove, fill or alter 50 cubic yards or more of material within the banks of a waterway. Based on your application, your project involves removal or filling of less than 50 cubic yards of material , therefore a State removal-fill permit is not required. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and local planning department before beginning construction. Please contact us if you have any questions . Sincerely, 17;ele4: William L. Parks Natural Resource Coordinator Field Operations WLP/aod rf22 : 138 c: Dan Gresham, U. S . Army Corps of Engineers Jim Andrews , Authorized Agent • fait 4A, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS r P.O.BOX 2946 PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 April 9, 1996 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Operations, Construction, and Readiness Division SUBJECT: Permit Application No: 96-246 John Duncan 16055 SW. 74th Portland, Oregon 97224 Dear Mr. Duncan: We have reviewed your application (Enclosure 1) for a Department of the Army Permit to install a 5-inch sanitary sewer line to connect an existing manhole, by placing approximately less than 50 cubic yards of fill material in a wetland adjacent to Fanno Creek, near Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. We have determined that the proposed work would be authorized under the terms of the nationwide permit described below, subject to the conditions (Enclosure 2 & 3), and provided You receive permits, where required, under Oregon's Removal/Fill Law and appropriate local authorizations. Nationwide permit 33 CFR 330, Appendix A, Section B, 12, authorizes discharges of material for backfill or bedding for utility lines, including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no change in preconstruction contours. A "utility line" is defined as any pipe or pipeline for the transportation of any gaseous, liquid, liquefiable, or slurry substance, for any purpose, and any cable, line, or wire for the transmission for any purpose of electrical energy, telephone and telegraph messages, and radio and television communication. The term "utility line" does not include activities which drain a water of the United States, such as drainage tile, however, it does apply to pipes conveying drainage from another area. Material resulting from trench excavation may be temporarily sidecast (up to three months) into waters of the United States provided that the material is not placed in such a manner that it is dispersed by currents or other forces. The District Engineer may extend the period of temporary side-casting up to 180 days, where appropriate. The area of waters of the United States that is disturbed must be limited to the minimum necessary to construct the utility line. In wetlands, the top 6" to 12" of the trench should generally be backfilled with topsoil from the trench. Excess material must be removed to upland areas immediately upon completion of construction. Any exposed slopes and stream banks must be stabilized immediately upon completion of the utility line. The utility line itself will require a Section 10 permit if in navigable waters of the United States. (See 33 CFR Part 322). IY -2- This verification is valid until two years beyond the date of this letter or until the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. All the nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified, reissued or revoked in January 1997. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a public notice announcing the changes when they occur. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date the nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve months from the date of the modification or revocation to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of the nationwide permit. If you have any questions, regarding our nationwide permit authority, please contact me at the above address or telephone (503) 326-7731. 1 Sincerely, i lel Gresham I Project Manager Regulatory Branch Enclosures Copies Furnished: ODSL (Parks) ODEQ (Priest) w/Application CO-GP (Black) w/Application .ALL•,. April 24, 1996 Alk Nicoli Engineering Attn: Jim Andrews CITY OF TIGARD 9025 SW Center Street P.O. Box 23784 OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 Re: John Duncan Building/16055 SW 74th Avenue Dear Jim: This letter is in response to your request for issuance of the pending building permits and the request for a Minor Modification to the approved Site Development Review for the property. Before Building Permits are issued under the current site approval, the issue of the storage of barrels will need to be addressed. Mr. Duncan can either screen the barrels, store the barrels on a screened portion of the property, or remove the barrels altogether. To date, little action has been taken on this issue. Previously, the Conditions of Approval were reviewed with the Hearings Officer Deniece Won. She indicated that the intent of the Condition of Approval was that the applicant construct complete street improvements along both sides of the subject portion of SW 74th Avenue because the proposed development would largely build-out the applicant's property and the railroad property that is to be utilized to serve this development. She recognized that City requirements call for frontage improvements along developing property, and that curbing without proper street improvements would not complete street or drainage design requirements. Section 18.164.030 (A) (c) of the Community Development Code permits the construction of less than complete street improvements where it has been shown to be unfeasible given existing development constraints. Because this is not the case on this site and no variance was requested, the Condition of Approval did not intend to waive this requirement. We would also not recommend a variance to these requirements because of the site conditions. An application for a Minor Modification to the approved Site Development Review for the site can be reviewed and approved after the Building Permits have been issued. However, if the modification is not feasible or cannot be approved, completion of the required improvements will be required according to the Hearing's Officer conditions of approval. It is recommended that you file a site plan for the proposed modification with the wetland's determination as soon as possible. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, 17/44114/4 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP is\curpin\rnark_r\dunmod.doc c: SDR 95-0014 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 .i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: May 17, 1996 TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division QQ FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 95-0014 Duncan Industrial Building ** Minor Modification ** This memo is provided as a response to the applicant's desire to modify an existing SDR approval. The applicant proposes to modify the proposed parking plan to eliminate the need for additional parking on the east side of SW 74th Avenue (on property owned by the railroad, but leased to the applicant). The applicant will extend the parking area on his property further to the south instead. Engineering does not have any concerns with this proposal and believes all conditions of approval issued for the original SDR 95-0014 decision are valid, except for Condition# 3 which currently reads as follows: "3. The applicant shall complete construction of the sidewalk along the entire west frontage of SW 74th Avenue and install a curb along the leased portion of the east frontage to City standards." Because the applicant's revised proposal removes the proposed parking improvements from the leased property on the east side of 74th Avenue,we do not believe there is justification to require installation of the curb on that side of the roadway and recommend that the applicant not be required to comply with that portion of the condition. The first part of the condition, however, will obligate the applicant to build more sidewalk along the west side of 74th Avenue than what was proposed on the original approved plans. The applicant is aware of this and has shown on his plans that the additional sidewalk will be provided. i:\eng\brianr\sdr95-14.br PAGE 1 .ti May 6, 1996 SRI/Sl IA1`1 RO Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street • Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Preliminary Wetland Determination Findings for the 74th Avenue and Durham Road Site (SRI/SHAPIRO Project #7965057) Y'. Dear Mr. Andrews: At your request, SRI/SHAPIRO, Inc. conducted a preliminary wetland determination for a site located on the corner of S.W. 74th Avenue and S.W. Durham Road on April 20, 1996. Prior to our site investigation, you identified the area of interest with lath and flagging. The area was approximately 70 feet wide and 200 feet long, and immediately adjacent to S.W. 74th Avenue and S.W. Durham Road. Based on my site visit, I could not identify any vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology associated with wetlands within the staked area. Therefore, you would not require a formal wetland delineation for this area. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, LA--.,4W\ UUO k— Fremont II Alison Rhea Wetland Scientist/Hydrologist 1650 N.W. Front Ave. Suite 302 Portland, OR 97209 Tel•phon•: 503.274.9000 • Focsintile: 503.274.0123 • NICOEI GINEERING and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 May 8, 1996 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 Mark Roberts Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: John Duncan Building 16055 SW 74th PC 12-01 C BUP95-0507 SDR 95-0014 SLR 95-0010 Job#95-0110 Dear Mark: Please find enclosed the revised site plans for the minor modification to the John Duncan project. A fence has been proposed to screen the barrel storage area. Also, a Wet Land determination report has been enclosed, which verifies that the proposed parking area is not within the Wet Lands area adjacent to Fanno Creek. Hopefully this information will resolve the remaining issues as stated in you April 24th letter, and allow the issuance of the pending building permit. Thank you for your help and cooperation and if you have any further comments or questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, cif) James D. Andrews Project Manager enclosures JDA:jh • May 28, 1996 1 Nicoll Engineering CITY OF TIGARD Attn: Jim Andrews OREGON 9025 SW Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: John Duncan Building/16055 SW 74th Avenue Dear Jim: This letter is in response to the pending Minor Modification of the approved Site Development Review for the John Duncan Property. Mr. Duncan has removed several hundred of the existing barrels and other outdoor storage materials. He has also agreed to remove the remaining barrels and other stored materials within the yard area prior to the issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy for the new building. We have also agreed that limited outdoor storage may continue within the loading dock area. With these conditions the Director has approved the proposed Minor Modification. This modification deletes the current Condition of Approval #3 that addressed street improvement requirements for the railroad property and adds two Conditions of Approval in place of the previous condition. 3. a. The applicant shall submit revised plans to the Planning and Building Division's without the previously proposed areas for a screened outdoor storage use. b. The applicant shall remove the remaining outdoor storage on the property adjacent to the loading dock area. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, (-7/7W , • Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP i^,curpinlmark_r',ducmod.doc c: SDR 95-0014 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 October 17, 1996 CITY OF TIGARD Rob Baur Tualatin River Keepers OREGON Watershed Watch Volunteer 15941 SW Inverturie Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Re: Fill work on the Jadco Site at 16055 SW 74th Street Dear Mr. Baur: This letter is in response to your concerns regarding fill that has been placed along the east side of the Tualatin River, several hundred feet north of the Durham Bridge. The property owner Mr. John Duncan, applied for and obtained, a fill permit to place 500 cubic yards of fill on the property (City permit SIT 96-0031). As part of the Durham Road-widening work, the Oregon Department of Transportation was also permitted to place 600 cubic feet of fill around the widened bridge area.-This fill was mitigated by excavation of fill under the bridge and from other areas. Upon receipt of your letter, Mr. Duncan was contacted and we walked the affected bank areas. Mr. Duncan stated that in addition to the fill work that was recently done, he had truck loads full of overgrown berry bushes removed from portions of his property that are within the floodplain. He showed me a receipt for this work for approximately $2,300. We discussed the fact that erosion control methods needed to be undertaken for the fill work. Mr. Duncan stated that he had also met with an inspector with Washington County's Erosion Control Program and that he intended to plant turf on the affected bank as erosion control. He stated that additional work was still to be undertaken for portions of the bank in accordance with the fill permit. We discussed that inspection of the work is required. After walking the site, I reviewed previous floodplain and wetland's delineation studies prepared for the property as a part of the land use review for the expansion that is underway on the site. I also reviewed historic topographic and floodplain maps for the entire site. Based on this review, it is not evident that any illegal fill work has taken place. The City appreciates your interest in preservation issues along the Tualatin River and welcome any questions or concerns you might have in the future. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, d7//tea 462G& Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP i:curplanlmark_rlriver.doc ` 13125 S\ Hall BINW,Rriakr2198121 S) 639-4171 TDD <..i V.2.._.., TUALA i'IN• .RI VERKEEPERS 16295 S.W. 85th Ave. hh Tigard,Oregon 97224-5569 U )/)/■ ± • 503-624-0855 • • 1"' U triverk@teleport.com OCT-. 1 •l 1996••• CITy -Op TiGA ?D City of Tigard 10/7/96 Code Enforcement • • Dear Sir or Madam, I have noticed significant.fill in flood plain wetlands along Fanno Creek next to the Durham Road Bridge. The fill is on the right before the bridge as you head towards Hall Blvd. and has nothing to do with the bridge rebuilding. The fill is . between Durham Road and the JADCO company at 16055 74th Street. • Tax lot2S 1 13AB800 Has the City given anyone a permit to fill in the flood plain? I also noticed no silt fences or erosion prevention between the fill and the creek . Thank you for your attention in this matter, I am looking forward to your response. _4,z6 Rob Baur Tualatin Riverkeepers Watershed Watch Volunteer • 15941 SW Inverurie Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • • • • • RIVERKEEPER® is a rapistered trademark of the Hudson Riverkeeper Fund,Inc..and is Jicensed for use herein. • Printed on recycled paper,diovn free process,Nnh sor ink MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Jim FROM: Greg ' DATE: Oct. 11 SUBJECT: Attached Letter from Riverkeepers There appears to be a need for a fill permit and SLR. Mike Mills has mentioned this need to the owner placing the fill and to various City staff and can provide additional details. If you would like assistance with this, please let Mike or me know. _NT �o-� TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE < ' FIRE PREVENTION 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive • P.O.Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076. (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538 u ,' &RESC " November 15, 1996 James D. Andrews Nicoli Engineering P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: John Duncan Warehouse 16055 S.W. 74 File Number: 347-95 Dear Mr. Andrews: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code(UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code(UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. Plans for the above noted project are not approved. Please address the following items and resubmit plans to the City of Tigard Planning Department for routing to this office for review and approval. Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1) When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1) Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4) "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives James D. Andrews November 15, 1996 Page 2 Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles and maintain the minimum 20 foot wide unobstructed driving surface, "No parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE -TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5(1)(2)&(3)) The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM)required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 526-2469 referring to the above noted file number. Sincerely, 4-4 Jerry L. Renfro, DFM Plans Examiner JLR:kw / cc: City of Tigard Planning Dept. January 2, 1997 • Rob Baur CITY OF TIGARD Tualatin River Keepers Watershed Watch Volunteer OREGON 15941 SW Inverturie Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Re: Fill work on the Jadco Site at 16055 SW 74th Street Dear Mr. Baur: This letter is in response to your letters dated December 12th and 30th regarding fill within the 100-year floodplain along the east side of the Tualatin River. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Maps indicate that the 100-year floodplain elevation varies between 129 to 130 feet in this area. The limit of fill work performed was above those elevations. Site specific topographic maps and site plan studies that have been prepared for the City and by the property owner Mr. John Duncan, conflict with the general overview floodplain map which you sent with your letter (see enclosed topographic map section). Where a discrepancy is found, site specific topographic maps are used to determine the precise floodplain elevation(s) due to their level of detail. Overgrowth of vegetation, accumulated debris, etc., within much of the floodplain would likely account for the height of the water as shown in the picture you provided. As I previously indicated, Mr. Duncan - --~- removed overgrown vegetation on portions of his property but much of the floodplain appears to have similar overgrown vegetation. - Upon receipt of your December 12th letter I asked that the Building Division provide you with a copy of fill permit SIT 96-0031. Due to copying and mailing costs, the permit copy may have been delayed pending receipt of payment for those copies. To refrain from further delay, I have enclosed copies of two (2) site work permits currently on file with the City for this location (SIT 95-0035 and SIT 96-0031 with the site work map for SIT 96-0031 attached). Notes on the site work map indicate that erosion control is to be provided as required by Unified Sewerage Agency (USA). I hope this will answer your questions. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, 1-44al.Q Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP iscurplan\mark_rlriver2.doc Enclosures (4) c: SDR 95-0014 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 . . ' . . .. . . . . 0 . _ --•",' .-.7"...777 -77.- -1 r-----. ...---.. If . 'c■ . , • . i \ - • ' - • . .. . i ... I • I,' 0 . ,:,:... :::- .. . -, • -r- - /- ' ‘ ' ' ...il: 7.:.-. ..40e" .;,.. . lip 127.3) 14, 7 l' ."... - -s. If le 0 .---74141., t ■ 1 P Ally 7 4,41. 1 -'''''K‘ie,:': ;7.,•..•. .. ., . . II ogi .44744'7 kW / i. (2.-• :-• ;,._414.- . - • ' I -. "1 / r It PAVED . .. , ,. ,,.'4. , ,_ . , . ,,,,) s, . , ..,.•...,„... ,.. - -- -41110111111e4 I 101 ' / cp II (,,,,- 2 / V •. • • -........._ - •,,- 6-4Aratpix.,- -.. ,,fr lw• ? .kik."... . ..,.: 0,-to: • eVOP itill,:l ...,.x.:;,,,..,.,-,.7;to,... ....,.. , PARKING to : .0.40,0p,, ,,,,, ,, Abrtikt /if 1141111b* , ,,-,77, PP.... •1 l ( /1/\6\./1 X 'I / 'IC X144.9 C84, 6) 0 lir lir ((k A 0 (,, pxt:\ 4I6e , • C.:' D .0 _ , b _...-' \ 71- • AdOr' 47„., 1 ‘ cci \ ,./k• 0 0 ZiL XI36.7 110/ / Witio xI4 • r 0 c) X143.2 ' 1•C‘ .. e v Ilk . kr, 4) 411 41irk 1 fit.... . / x . •cB i A 0 ‘_ . 1S• ft , k4Iti 0 11111 1 P .o likC it* /• ilh .44. ., filiS9 .. ; .: C84.4°.cleilltilki ./d.. \Nall X *1111. 1...m.11.11 Art ,..? PAVED s• $1,` 2: .3 ZI:Uo,,* PARKING 0 I 5 6.7 ur 0 lira , N 641,000 \'\ Ira - % sktits. Nliti a C8 W'A C8 OA, > f.0j11 ..t al; VA. 'ID 1:1,-1D Poo‘ 1 I 5 5.7 .9C8 x 1 cE01141.1 ,0, if ib.,"P I I. 156.3.41;4°i e••„ a, 1116. 0• .. Chili ill. 0 L.-4 tl• a E(.2) 4 64x0.2 .411 lirliPa el./433 .a 1.,,,,,- CB 111111I4Iri -r Q1 H . 114C. -•''.-:--F'•r ' ''4"4-77-41'5-71-- .s. 'AI-,,.".V.A.7-5-7fr;t:Vv. 7%. 47 . tilliallaa.II . i41, C) '4, •CB CB .. ..4 CD ifillb :111reiffilir roll - - -1...:'.. ?If-4.--,Wfz:.--"' $11. •'• D 0 PAVED9 0. 157.0 1 t2.2wr **C41.,--7:- -r• .. 7--..-.--..-..:.-:-.-•*1----- --.. .. ,.. ..716"8.,.._ • .t,,II i., . e. .1, • • ,.. k\III irl 0 0 X 0.CB i.s)tr.), 1..- -•,•.?-14-'4•‘• -• i 2. ... ., . ' . to - '- * ' ""' A''' -11.* r2R.. II- I 0 .0. cfp ,.. 0 o 11. -,..4i,....aitt..,.-.-_-• ,,... -__. ...:iF.:,.. .. .:. 1 ,......--•,.f • .,,-,-...,.. ..7 .:.1* , ::.....- ...f .. ....''..,,,...1.#4- - . - oR'ci,, „ , CB. > ;19 C:3:E:=, . ...asol ) cr....... 111 _--..- 1-7: ' V•-- -:._-- ".; :-._. ''.'.7;":::- . ; 7 , 'r,I.174.51'...4: 4, . :,.. v id:7 .-,__.,.,41iit.,-.;.:;,g, P 1„,:, ' . ... \)`.;-.'. / 'f' .ef.s: .... X150.1 •ECI .-4E4::r ' *-- - - • -.• - ''llwRiebemblhoossi4•••: - 4-14;,-1-;!:"'':'-'.. tr.., . 9 ''' ;474'T:4:' - :?' .21: ik' • Vikk e." .4'.‘ -- C=Z3 t ) •- •.`4' NZ. . ; .. . .. ...., . • 110.004SSa 1 ,.• - .)./";4tt:‘,,■7--,. -----:t...usoompit.i4.t,Z X•i-C'‘r-y'--, tt 4:A-f- 7. :1:".tN:'/V\;\1114R4;l'..‘i- ,00 . tr:::::•fir?"'153. ° " ..1:11p 155.6 ':' • '.".. '"',..1:.., ,,i.', '''''.‘ • .....,- ,'...-- .. . .... 0 0 . '-41: ' :..... - ...:;":.s.`-•.. .::::'-'--ill.‘"tt' ...:"4:-.- ...'-:-. arl,/ '4.A'-- . ''7 150 PARKING I( ..,. -/Vi441106.11.--\ *Aikk 1111 , 1.1:6.2 a -•,. ..... „4,., • '' .. . ;464, ..„1 -' _low 0 • C=:, -).FP2 . • • .-•.., -.--,....-.-. • -....itizy.,:i4Orry-.-, ---- -:--L..- . •-s -7 • --...:;4,,\ ..‘ vim- verti,,, - ,. ,,: -: -• :WY" .. - .. 1 ..`,• - '7-7 7 ". %. '-'*.' t-i,.:- : . i:0 AUMM CITY OF TICRD #1-1=RMI i1T SIT96-0031 1317= : O6 1 c)6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 131!5 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard.Oregon 97223.8199 (503)539-4171 ._S 1 1 dAB-00800 317E :1GD) E3.:7. . . : 160:7:5 Sw 74TH AC E SULDL,VISION - • ZONING: I—P BLOC-4 LOT AFE OF 461-i h : ,mil_T ;=yV INt3 v RESu. NO. : E7CLV VOLUME: 0 cy GRADING? • N VALUE. . . 6 : 500 F IiL� JOLUME: 5O0 cy LANDSCAPING? • N ENG FILL7' • N SITE PREP? Y '30iyi ;�.1 FEi.D ' : iv STORM _RAINS . . . . : iV IMPERV SURFACE: 0 sf Remarks : Site and grading permit to level area of approximately 500 CU yards around an existing building. Owner : — FEES JOHN DUNCAN type amount by date recpt 16055 SW 74TH AVENUE PRMT 3 25. 00 JH 06/04/96 96-280181 SPCT $ 1. 25 JH 06/04/96 96-280181 TIGARD OR 97223 EROS $ 26. 00 JH 06/04/96 96-280181 Phone #: 684-0044 ERPC 3 8. 45 JH 06/04/96 96-280131 ERPC $ 3. 45 JH 06/04/96 96-280181 Contractor: PLCR $ 6. 50 B 06/ 11/96 96-280447 OWNER 'h n e # : - 5 75. 65 TOTAL Reg #. . : 13125 REQUI RED INSPECTIONS This peruit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Erosion Control Tigard Municipal Code, State of Ore. Specialty Codes and all other Final Inspection aopiicacie laws. All work will ae done in accordance with approved plans. This peruit will expire if work is not started within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for sore than 180 days. , ermlt:tee Si ature : ``Of , .� - issued By : , Call for inspection — 639-4175 1 I -! _ " 1 - l 1. _ - lMw� - 1 ■ I I I 2 /cal` 33-0,J ' 7% i GZ, !_S vr,dul1A :;j ON 1 A ' y'33 J 011 h 11/il . 1 �� O m .. I I o = D. 1 1 N.A. ! • ... 7 , , I 0 t..5,9,14F oi „ , ,0 '1 �i1 ,• r_ O 1, -n 1 �� j D , Fm ~ 1 0 1 - a4tu ;4t - -- ,' 1 1 1 _ 1 9111111111 ------J 1- -1--........\.. ! 1 1 I _ - � 1 3URL(NGTON N4RTHFRN RAIL,Z,oAp — - — ` - 1 I1 1 I 1 I s �%jy' v0d-c f"9ll d e "c4/172-)-al- 1 I D 4 J ex, 11 1, -�_, -1,t 171'e i 1 \ I i �Oh1 A (/N L U v� i y f! r. I di °4 ■ y freePe X60 SS- SGti • 7 ni 77O#6240 / DrPyd 1,--) q citth op C114) a,1 4 (4.c i 5 k. ,,,;c ocre =ITC WO-RV PERMIT CI1YOFTRJRD DA i EI ISSUED: 07/23/965-0035 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 13125 SW Hail Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223.8199 (503)639-4171 PARCEL: 2S 1 13AB-00800 SITE ADDRESS. . . : 16055 SW 74TH AVE SUBDIVISION ZONING: I—P BLOCK • LOT • TYPE OF WORK: NEW PAVING? • `( RESO. NO. : EXCV VOLUME: 0 cy GRADING? • Y VALUE. . . $ : 27815 FILL VOLUME: 0 cy LANDSCAPING? • Y ENG FILL? • Y SITE PREP? • Y SOILS RPT READ? : Y STORM DRAINS?. . . : Y IMPERV SURFACE: 14389 sf Remarks : Grading permit "SITE" Owner: FEES JOHN DUNCAN type amount by date recpt 16055 SW 74TH AVE EROS $ 80. 00 JDA 07/23/96 96-281951 ERPC $ 26. 00 JDA 07/23/96 96-281951 TIGARD OR 97224 ERPC $ 26. 00 JDA 07/23/96 96-281951 Phone #: PRMT $ 184. 00 JDA 07/23/96 96-281951 5PCT $ 9. 20 JDA 07/23/96 96-281951 Contractor: PLCK $ 119. 60 JSD 07/23/96 95-270998 OWNER SWM $ 545. 04 JDA 07/23/96 96-281951 Phone #: $ 989. 84 TOTAL Reg #. . : REQUIRED INSPECTIONS This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Erosion Control Tigard Municipal Code, State of Ore. Specialty Codes and all other Excavation Insp applicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with Grading Insp approved plans. This persit will expire if work is not started Strm Drain Insp within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for core Structural mason than 180 days. Engineered gradi Final Inspection Permittee Signature : `J— i Issued By: • , n Call for inspection — 639-4175 File SDR 95-0014 Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97224 Dear Mark: Thanks for your response dated Oct 17th. Please send me a copy of the permit #SIT 96-0031. We are very concerned about the cumulative effects of floodplain filling. The Fanno Creek area has a history of flooding and fill reduces the storage of flood waters making subsequent floods worse. Was this site in the 100 year flood plain? Does Tigard or Unified Sewerage Agency have responsibility for erosion control within the City limits? It appeared that Tigard had given a permit to fill but no erosion control measures were taken. Are there specific erosion control requirements in the permit? There is still no silt fence at the bottom of the fill and the bank is starting to gully from the winter rains. I did notice a hydromulch application. We curious about this site because ODOT on the downstream side of the bridge seemed to follow the rules with mitigation excavation and silt fences, but across the road upstream on the Dunce property nothing in the way of mitigation or erosion control was done. Only after we contacted Unified Sewerage Agency were any erosion control steps taken. To briefly re-cap we would like a copy of permit SIT 96-0031 and answers to the following questions: 1. Was this site in the 100 year flood plain? 2. Does Tigard or Unified Sewerage Agency have responsibility for Surface Water Management in Tigard City limits? 3. Are there specific erosion control requirements in the permit? Thanks again for your time, CIti iJG��� /2'ly�9G Rob Baur Tualatin Riverkeepers Watershed Watch Volunteer 15941 SW Inverurie Lake Oswego, OR 97035 TUALAI IN RIVERKEEPERS 16295 S.W. 85th Ave. Tigard,Oregon 97224-5569 l 503-624-0855 triverk @teleport.com Mark Roberts Associate Planner City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 December 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Roberts: • While I haven't received a response from my last letter yet, I felt it was important to send you some additional.information. I found. As you can see from the attached Washington County Flood Plain map; the fill I questioned is located in the flood plain. The attached picture taken December 29, 1996 at 3:00 P.M. • clearly shows flood water rising up the face of the fill. While the rains were heavy that day, flooding in that area is frequent.. It seems obvious that the fill is in the flood plain and it also restricts the Fanno Creek flood way. Has the City received permission from Division of State Lands, Corps.of Engineers or Washington County to allow fill in such a sensitive area? If the fill is not permitted will the City rescind the fill permit and require the fill be removed? Thanks again for your time, Rob Baur Tualatin Riverkeepers Watershed Watch Volunteer 15941 Inverurie Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • • • • { Printed on recycled paper,dioxin free process,with soy ink . • 111111111 - . . • ,3 - • .t 4 • IV:t.''' ` /' . l \ } •. .r. • %, . , r -..., lr • 1 '''- , - , _ , , . , ,#* N, .•. . Y.. i.,•• -...... ..,...,,.,.. as - ...III kit t a .q •• R • ., [ ,r 4• ' t• ti "� , ~• !,�' -�. `! '{ <• .4.0. .40 II 7-0":%ma • ..... . s. NW 11111. • .I .. l'" - '-4 . :• .,w �. ^• [ _ •- ° 5.0 �. l" 1• r •;4. t �`�+i.i4 -. ow. c ., : i, �Mr -'r r • L _ � : a 'aC L' 4•,! + f ? • , .. •{ ; : : - 1 a rJ �w• ` •'.�L.1.` }�i' Xy3� � y # yr I • r - k' Tt \ • l • '' k '.. �t . "1"'".1.'"4 i Il ~' 'K�•` er,w.wksd "•w :.*, _ 4`:. .. �ilr$• r`I ij,, ... 4-'„.;40.4'..,' ... -s,- „ .., r i,a . '",a`+•• "= f.'r y♦. ".r 1_ - ,*.�;;i ;t: &it:. i .. . _ ,.. . "jr- ti : ;i'i• ,- L�. \ • " 1 I .' d I, �;�s 7 fit. J. y •' N .. y, I: _ .6' ) -....... .. ,f',, ,..k L i < r ..0..-4,lc.. a ..• • . f. r q t! a ♦ L t`• P i. `�p I ,. /,, 1,....= r -r .�`. _ yp..If t' fir yb r i ., r, - ? 1 �� _�' ` x'rr:•,acre - . COOG ' I 1!, r '„~�, + /� a•... r , yr. ' ' �'i : . '`. S s ':r _ .. s i e...., .. . N.-. • , r If '.40 Da 1./j ' ,• lope!, ?.4 ..f*( �'''' y; -•.'4 T1 ,! `ter f r •■. A ;�!^ . ...---‘1111114c41;44':,,,,I): ' „17-3;1"-1.,• . 0 rl, ,,....-A x.,_ :': . . , . ' iflole • ,,�; rS .. ltluw‘y(Jul., 46! ,,,g,':•.".:.:4-111•11-• t '4 < k _ I" ' _ •- -t i ' + • N f �7 �Fr�w.A' '• � /" .• y ��y- �• Q'• I 7 % `T7! . ! 1�tSF: - A _y 5 e. [r • C,L 4t r_n r t fTb �J .r ii F * L •+ R1 yy 'r ; y 1�. o f Era P.' '. .'; . _4 re.. :' :..... ` 1, ,i ! b .9 {� �;. .. i ; u Din � ,,• .�•'J J. - r -- . . ,� t +r,•�r•er:,A. 1 ,� s t N . 0 N11 11/2 T2S R 11 IV DATE o 1974 UPDATED : JUNE 1983 , ORD. No. 263 \iVSH.• (.' J. C. , _ _ ) October 17, 1996 C PY • Rob Baur Tualatin River Keepers Watershed Watch Volunteer 15941 SW Inverturie Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Re: Fill work on the Jadco Site at 16055 SW 74th Street Dear Mr. Baur: This letter is in response to your concerns regarding fill that has been placed along the east side of the Tualatin River, several hundred feet north of the Durham Bridge. The property owner Mr. John Duncan, applied for and obtained, a fill permit to place 500 cubic yards of fill on the property (City permit SIT 96-0031). As part of the Durham Road-widening work, the Oregon Department of Transportation was also permitted to place 600 cubic feet of fill around the widened bridge area. This fill was mitigated by excavation of fill under the bridge and from other areas. Upon receipt of your letter, Mr. Duncan was contacted and we walked the affected bank areas. Mr. Duncan stated that in addition to the fill work that was recently done, he had truck loads full of overgrown berry bushes removed from portions of his property that are within the floodplain. He showed me a receipt for this work for approximately $2,300. We discussed the fact that erosion control methods needed to be undertaken for the fill work. Mr. Duncan stated that he had also met with an inspector with Washington County's Erosion Control Program and that he intended to plant turf on the affected bank as erosion control. He stated that additional work was still to be undertaken for portions of the bank in accordance with the fill permit. We discussed that inspection of the work is required. After walking the site, I reviewed previous floodplain and wetland's delineation studies prepared for the property as a part of the land use review for the expansion that is underway on the site. I also reviewed historic topographic and floodplain maps for the entire site. Based on this review, it is not evident that any illegal fill work has taken place. The City appreciates your interest in preservation issues along the Tualatin River and welcome any questions or concerns you might have in the future. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP i:curplan\mark_r\river.doc c: SDR 95-0014 land use file r 1 NIC0 INGINEERINd and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 February 5, 1997 City of Tigard-Building Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Mark Roberts RE: John Duncan Building-Previous Land Use Action PC 12-01C BUP 95-0507 16055 SW 74th Tigard, OR 97224 Job#97-0105 Dear Mark: Northwest Auction Galleries is proposing to occupy the John Duncan building located at the above described location. The following information is being provided to you to help clarify the specific type of business activities that the tenant will be conducting on site. Northwest Auction Galleries employs about 7 people who provide support to the business. The business provides estate planning, appraisals, storage and a private auction. The majority of the business is performing appraisals. Approximately 70% - 75% of the business is directed toward this aspect of the business. The majority of the appraisals are performed off site for northwest financial institutions, estate sales, etc. Artwork appraisals and the proof of authenticity is also an aspect of the appraisal process. Northwest Auction Galleries will catalog the items being appraised and prepare, in the office, an itemized list establishing the quality, cost and quantity of the items in the estate. Some items are brought to the office and are stored in either the office, warehouse, staging or auction areas while the appraisals are being performed. February 5, 1997 City of Tigard-Mark Roberts John Duncan Building Page 2 Estate planning consulting is another aspect of the business. Representatives of Northwest Auction Galleries review the contents of the estate and establish a value of the estate and a strategy on how to dispose of the items in the estate. During the estate appraisal and consulting process of the business,there are certain times when the estate is required to place the items of the estate in storage. Storage can be long term and the clients are charged a monthly fee. Another option is that items can be stored while waiting for appraisals. Items in storage are located throughout the facility, depending on the amount or size of the items. Financial institutions or probate officers will pay to have items stored at Northwest Auction Galleries facility due to the security provided by them. Overseas shipments are also stored on site until they are itemized and/or shipped to other auction houses or dealers. As an outcome of the appraisal process, some items are designated to be disposed of via the auctioning process. This aspect of the business comprises approximately 20% - 30% of the business. The auctions are held once a month and performed in two sessions(two consecutive evenings.) Guest are allowed to preview the auction items only during the two days prior to the auction at established times. Attendance is by invitation only and primarily(90%) of the people attending are wholesale buyers. Some clients are from out of state and a catalog is sent to them so they may bid on items by either fax or telephone. Due to the amount of expensive items stored or auctioned on site all persons attending the auction must be pre-approved in order to attend or purchase any items. Other than preview and auction dates the facilities is not open to the public. That is,the auction aspect of the business occurs only four days per month. The only exception to this is, for private appraisals which are scheduled by appointment only. Besides the business aspects of the company Northwest Auction Galleries organizes seminars for local wholesale clients. The seminars are provided as a courtesy to their clients and are given by selected experts in the specific fields. 4 February 5, 1997 City of Tigard-Mark Roberts John Duncan Building Page 3 Hopefully this outline has provided you with adequate information to explain and determine the type of use being proposed for the Duncan building. It is clear that this is not a retail establishment and if one must categorize the auction function as a retail activity, that the remaining portions of the building are not specific to the auction activity. If you must categorize the auction as a retail activity,the auction area comprises of less than 20% of the building and this is allowed to occur within the zone designation. If you have any questions please feel free to call me or Mr. Robert Huillier of Northwest Auction Galleries. Sincerely, c --;:\t -lc.t...".„.t.,..„ ,.. James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:jh cc: John Duncan(owner) Robert Huillier(tenant) Don Lloyd(attorney) February 12, 1997 elk CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering 9025 SW Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Proposed tenant improvement plan for 15995 SW 74th Avenue Dear Jim: This letter is in follow up to your letters concerning the proposed NW Auction use. The Director has determined that a portion of this use is considered a Retail Sales Use but that the majority of the proposed tenant improvements are permitted outright within the I-P Zoning District. Specifically, the Director has interpreted that the warehouse and office square lease areas are not counted against the 20% limitation that applies to the General Retail Sales tenant improvements. The recent Site Development Review plan stated that the existing Jadco Building was a total of 8,000 square feet of which 7,000 had been developed as warehouse and 1,000 square feet as office space. The new building of 14,774 square feet was proposed to be developed for 5,622 square feet of office, and 9,152 square feet of warehouse. NW Auctions proposes to occupy 9,848 square feet of the new building for use as an auction house. The tenant improvement plans provided 2,335 square feet of office, 1,850 square feet of warehouse, and 3,150 square feet for auction staging. An additional 2,513 square feet has been designated for the actual auction. The Director has determined this portion of the proposed tenant improvements to be a General Retail Sales use. The Planned Industrial Zoning District permits up to 20% of a "Development Complex" to be developed as a General Retail Sales use. This means that 20% of the building square footage on the site can be used for retail sales. Based on the recent Site Development Review, the site is developed with a total of 22,774 square feet. The total square footage for the retail portion of the auction use and any other retail uses cannot exceed 4,558 square feet. Page 1 of 2 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 As I mentioned to John Duncan, because of the additional research involved in making a Director's Interpretation, an additional fee of $50 is due upon issuance of the proposed tenant improvement plans. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, �LZ ectlAz&- Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP c: Jim Hendryx John Duncan Dick Bewersdorff Bonnie Mulhearn SDR 95-0014 Land Use file 1997 Director's Interpretations file is curpin/mark_r/duncan3.doc Page 2 of 2 1 1 r 1134/,30/97 r r 101:4r 4, l .750 8201 210161 I r I N IC O1 I 1 E NG.1,Inc. +->- 1 CI TY 10F TIGARD I 1 1 ! f C 002 ;1 1 r i - 1 1 1 I 1 1 i l l 1 1 1 1 ENE 1 I i I 1 1 1 1 F1 II -II' II I 0 11111I ' I -i ! I11 111 111111 III f ( 111 ill i I -I1 ! '1 " l I 1 l 1 1 I I I ; I I I I 1 1- I 1 1 l- 1 r I . I I .1 . I I I I I I. i I. 11 1 1 1 I I I I - 1_ ! ! ii . 11 1 1 11 1 , 1 11 1 I i I 1 1 1 1 1 11 ; 1 -I I - 1 I 11 I IT 1! '- ! . 1 1 - 1 I 1 I .'a.-1 ' 1 1 11 4 ii l ; I I i 1 . n I 1 i 1 I l i 1Jouv m 1IIIII 1 1 1 11 i I i f i 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 I 1 MEE •I 1 I� 1WUL.' 11 1 WA 1 1 11 , �U I II1I. . a ���0� i ' 1 11 1 1 r i I. I. I ' 1 1 1 11 ��NI a 1f•`'1 MI � WI ll Ilb'r[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I i E 1 1 { . i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4; i i l ∎ I `• f I 11 1 11 I I f I and-Construction Services, Inc_ • 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784-Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086-FAX(503) 684-3636 May 1, 1997 - - Mr. Mark Roberts •City of Tigard-Planning.Department . 13125 SW Hall Blvd- Tigard,OR 97223 . . RE: Duncan Industrial Building _ .15995 SW,74`h Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 - _ _ .. SDR-9570014 • SLT-95 7.0010 Job#95-0105 • Dear Mr Roberts: - It appears that some of the site improvements will not be completed prior to the tenants request for occupancy_ The weather has delayed the installation of some of the site development items(i.e. landscape items,curbing etc_) Mr_Duncan is requesting that he be allowed to bond the remaining items which will allow him to receive temporary occupancy. Please find attached the engineers estimate for the work to be bonded. Let me know if you have any questions. I"will be directing Mr.Duncan to proceed with the. bonding process with his bank Sincerely, - - a,vin,-,11-- - ay.c.PALLAA.a.,. 73 • James D.Andrews - • • Project Manager- JDA:jh -. • enclosures- ._ - ? iI .04/t30/97 10: 4 r , i' `5r 03 62,0 i208,6 It I l i l Nr ICl OLI I l ENG. I nc -044 CITY OF TIGA!RD 1 ( 131,9 r [ I t 1 I I I l ( I i r l i I I I I I I I { l ! j I ICI ! ! ffl ! I ! ! I f �II1 1-111 I ! IIIi1II I -I It !. Ilfl € Ifll € II ; II ! III lIlf ! 111 Iii I I I I I 1 ! I 1 I w i ! i 1- 1- I'-I 1 -I ! 1 1 1 E i i l l i i l k l l l ! 1 1 1 1 I 1IiII •i I1 II 1111 1 f1 ! Ilfl ! I if ! I 1 ; o Aft, € Ir II I r illllI i I f1 33 I { 11 { { 14 ( II II € It I k IN I I I sllil 'I RE 111111 IIlllllll III I I II I ! I I € l i v) Lrl ItO m I. a►1 ! I ! t F l „ I ! r , r l , �� � � i i l l l l i l l ! I I I I I I I I I I and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784-Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086-FAX(503)684-3636 DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING May 1, 1997 SDR-95-0014 SLR-95-0010 • ENGINEERS ESTIMATE Combing: 530 LF..@$2.50/L.F. $1,575.00 Curbing(South lot): 605 L_F_ @$2.50iLY. $1,512.50 Landscaping :� $3,322.50 Landscaping(South lot): $3,640.00 Asphalt,concrete,and rock base(South lot) $7,000.00 - Parting Lot Stdpping: S750.00 Parking L-ot Stripping(South lot): $500-00_ TOTAL _ $18,300.00 04/30/97 13:58 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0001 ***************************************** *** ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT TX *** ***************************************** ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *8168 TX G3 712 623 9402 04/29 14:55 00'55 2 OK *8169 TX G3 206 728 1179 04/29 15:12 01' 16 2 OK *8171 TX G3 04/29 15:15 01'55 3 OK *8174 TX G3 5035981868 04/29 15:59 02'16 4 OK *8176 TX G3 5036441529 04/29 16:04 01'50 3 OK *8178 TX 15035981868 04/29 16:07 00'00 0 NG 0 STOP *8180 TX G3 5981868 04/29 16:09 00'43 1 OK *8182 TX G3 6813908 04/29 16:18 02'47 3 OK *8183 TX G3 5036840337 04/29 16:28 00'43 1 OK *8188 TX G3 9688740 04/30 07:54 01 '25 3 OK *8189 TX G3 2063471801 04/30 07:57 01'25 3 OK *8191 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. , Inc. 04/30 08:17 00'45 1 OK *8193 TX G3 04/30 09:27 03'10 5 OK *8197 TX G3 6246539 04/30 09:34 00'43 1 OK *8202 TX G3 04/30 10:14 01'48 3 NG 3 ##104 *8201 TX 15039861562 04/30 10:21 00'00 0 NG 0 #018 *8206 TX G3 5036205184 04/30 10:31 01'08 2 OK *8207 TX G3 04/30 10:35 01'47 3 OK *8210 TX G3 5039861561 04/30 10:44 01 ' 18 3 OK *8212 TX G3 15036912328 04/30 10:50 01'42 3 OK *8216 TX G3 503 203 1813 04/30 12:09 01'16 1 OK *8219 TX G3 503 684 3611 04/30 12:19 01 '41 3 OK 8222 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. , Inc. 04/30 12:47 01'01 2 OK 8223 TX G3 503 239 2281 04/30 13:02 00'34 1 OK 8226 TX 6843636 04/30 13:58 00'00 0 NG 0 STOP ***************************************** *** ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT RX *** ***************************************** ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *8173 AUTO RX G3 04/29 15:27 02'08 3 OK *8184 AUTO RX G3 639 6302 04/29 16:43 00'57 1 OK *8185 AUTO RX G3 503 378 5859 04/29 17:30 03'12 5 OK *8186 AUTO RX G3 639 6302 04/29 20:28 00'57 1 OK *8192 AUTO RX G3 AMP ELECTRIC 04/30 08:46 00'59 1 OK *8196 AUTO RX G3 503 684 3611 04/30 09:32 01'26 2 OK *8199 AUTO RX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. ,Inc. 04/30 09:49 01'13 2 OK *8200 AUTO RX G3 503 624 0641 04/30 10:00 01'09 2 OK *8208 AUTO RX G3 503 2386443 04/30 10:33 01'38 3 OK *8214 AUTO RX G3 6817084 04/30 11:03 01'02 2 OK *8215 AUTO RX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. ,Inc. 04/30 11:39 01 '42 3 OK *8217 AUTO RX G3 2068544929 MCKINNEY 04/30 12:13 01'00 2 OK 8221 AUTO RX G3 04/30 12:35 01'36 2 OK 8224 AUTO RX G3 04/30 13:05 00'35 1 OK 8225 AUTO RX G3 04/30 13:25 01'47 2 OK 05'01/97 12:52 $503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. , Inc. CITY OF TIGARD 001 aa i r.: 7E E�>t i �!!II<�lt�. . !_ Z'!!4 and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: (503) 620-2086 FAX: (503) 684-3636 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SHEET TO: `111Ct1�K FROM: 'Yn /d re,L.a S COMPANY: t NUMBER OF PAGES: COVER + RE: hii.L al FAX: LOW 1;_qs-7 ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ FOR REVIEW & COMMENT ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR ACTION ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR USE (IF ANY PART OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS ILLEGIBLE OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE NOTIFY SENDER IMMEDIATELY_ THANK YOU.) COMMENTS: �y Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date 5 1 Ipages� l� To j j � L I i p From I W, a`4°vv‘ I W S Co./Dept. 1A d c_o6tp;4,14,3 Co. (t.,14 p.1171 # Phone# 3 Fax# 6cL/�-5 /34 Fax# Jt An — 1p-e Ca uSc `[-- ou Attila to ( o. LA"5 V' u)r-U `Fi `Foe Lu I l 4 o v e2y l4i Kt wtuwt porle; sfa vd c .e s k t 7000 Lvoc/4-4,1 o c c1 ita l ✓oc� Q 4d cot,ce e+e wo4 w; (I h•ed '� tae 4 Lied +o a u 7 / L'tAafrk 05/01/97 12:52 $503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. ,Inc. -*44 CITY OF TIGARD l 1002 il ! Illl ! illlllfll ! IIllilfilmil l 1111 IIIIIIEE f3El Eii IIIIIII Ifllfl { I ! fIII .1I I f ! lIIII ! I iI ! � IfI [ i i 1 ii 111111 1 111 1 I � � IIIIII11111 - 611111 Ilf IIt f I I II 1 1 i I' I { l i l �� i 1 177 1 E I I I I ! 1 1 ! ! I l l I I 1 f I I I I I 1 1 ! I I .1 I I -- I ` 1 1 1 _. I i I I .I I I I J I I I I I I I 1 1 { 1 I l i ! I II I. •?. II ( I { III � III ! IIIIIE IiIIIIII ': II f 1 II 1 ! I II I ilil ! 11 I ! ` bl ! IIlfilf ! LI I I it f-- ffI 1-_I i l �'� l i I � � LH I I l l l p 1 r4° I ! I I I • ! I ! ! illfillil � iiilll ! I I 1 I I '- I I I l f I I ? Mal\ 1 I III . II ra�i �.I I I I If I 1 1 I I I l i l { i I i I I I . - and Construction Services, Inc. - 9025 Southwest Center Street I.O. Box 23784-Tigard, Oregon 97223 • (503)620-2086-FAX (503) 684-3636 May 1, 1997 Mr.-Mark Roberts . City of Tigard-Planning Department 13125 SW Ha1I Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 _ _ RE: Duncan Industrial Building 15995 SW 74th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 SDR-95-0014 SLT-95=0010 lob#95 4)105 Dear Mr_Roberts: It appears that some of the site improvements will not be completed prior to the tenants request for occupancy_ The weather has delayed the installation of some of the site development items(i.e landscape items,curbing etc.) Mr. Duncan is requesting that he • be allowed to bond the.remaining items which will allow him to receive temporary • occupancy. Please find attached the engineers estimate for the work to be bonded. Let. me know if you have any questions. I will be directing Mr.Duncan to proceed with-the -bonding process with his bank - Sincerely, • -James D.Andrews Project Manager . JDA:jh enclosures . 05/01/97 12;53 , a 503, B29 ,2986 NICOLI ENq. ,Inc. 444 ciTy OF TIGARD „ , it003 . . . r. . ir ' 1 f4L-1 tIli ; I : ITJJ UPI L irif rr--- ; I 1. L : II ' 1 I • •-• • :Ask f: : i. I I I I I Ii ! l ! til • - Will =IF fili lla 1 • - - • - - MA LAMM" • • 11P11" ' ' ` ; • I ; 111 ; 117-r-.77 j 1 1 1 • .II I 1 F. 1 i• ! 1 I PI\ I ML71110(lltallinal -1 1 - • L 111 . - - and-Construction Services, Inc_ _ _ 9025 Southwest Center Streef • -- - P.O. Box23784Tigard,Oregon 97223 - (503)620-2086-FAX(503)684-3636 . _ . . • • • • • • • - May 2,1997 _ . - . . . • DUNCAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING - • '• ••• SDR-95-0014 • • SLR 95-0010 • • . . • • ENGINEERS ESTIMATE - : - Curbing 630_L.F. g$2_50/L_F, SI:575.00 Curbing(South lot): 605 LLF:®$2.50/L_F. $1 51/.50 . Landscaping: - $3,322.50 Landscaping -$3 640.00: _ . , . _ . Asphalt;concrete,and rock base(South lot) "— $7,000.00 Parking Lot Stripping: S750.00 Parking Lot Stripping-(South lot): . $50000 Wei Pond(install outlet structures) .- S1,500_00 TOTAL S19,800.00 • "7- . - _.. • •:. . - - • — • •-.. ' - • . . . • • • • • • • • . , .° • • • . • •• • • ow • • • • , o • 05/01/97 15:49 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 1j001 ****...s********************************** *** ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT TX *** ***************************************** ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *8244 TX G3 503 245 2919 04/30 15:17 01'42 3 OK *8240 TX 6246451 04/30 15:19 00'00 0 NG 0 =018 *8247 TX G3 04/30 15:25 01 '44 3 OK *8250 TX G3 15033998760 04/30 15:33 01 '22 2 OK *8249 TX 3998760 04/30 15:35 00'00 0 NG 0 STOP *8254 TX 6246451 04/30 16:21 00'00 0 NG 0 #018 *8256 TX 6246451 04/30 16:35 00'00 0 NG 0 #018 *8259 TX G3 503 620 2222 04/30 17:59 00'44 1 OK *8264 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. ,Inc. 05/01 08:02 02'01 5 OK *8271 TX G3 05/01 09:19 01'07 1 OK *8273 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. ,Inc. 05/01 10:05 01 '24 3 OK *8276 TX G3 206 543 2352 05/01 10:45 00'44 2 OK *8281 TX G3 5036561601 05/01 12:21 01'42 3 OK *8290 TX G3 503 533 6666 PACIFICRE 05/01 15:02 02'13 5 OK *8292 TX G3 503 274 0123 SRI SHAPIRO 05/01 15:30 03'56 7 OK *8294 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. ,Inc. 05/01 15:36 01'56 3 OK *8296 TX G3 5032247531 05/01 15:40 01 '26 3 OK *8298 TX G3 503 281 2547 05/01 15:43 01'15 2 OK 8300 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. , Inc. 05/01 15:46 01'32 3 OK ***************************************** *** ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT RX *** ***************************************** ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *8248 AUTO RX G3 04/30 15:23 00'43 1 OK *8253 AUTO RX G3 04/30 16:06 03'20 3 OK *8258 AUTO RX G3 503 646 6286 04/30 16:38 02'04 3 OK *8260 AUTO RX G3 04/30 20:15 03'38 5 OK *8261 MEMORY RX G3 05/01 02:02 03'39 5 OK *8262 MEMORY RX G3 6369323 05/01 06:47 01 '20 2 OK *8267 AUTO RX G3 503 239 6451 05/01 09:12 01 '24 3 OK *8268 AUTO RX G3 05/01 09:14 00'40 1 OK *8269 AUTO RX G3 05/01 09:15 00'11 0 NG 0 ##224 *8270 AUTO RX G3 05/01 09:16 00'41 1 OK *8277 AUTO RX G3 05/01 10:47 01'35 2 OK *8278 AUTO RX G3 6208127 05/01 11:00 00'50 1 OK *8279 AUTO RX G3 6208127 05/01 11:53 00'52 1 OK *8280 AUTO RX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. , Inc. 05/01 12:07 01'41 3 OK *8283 AUTO RX G3 05/01 13:23 00'59 1 OK *8284 AUTO RX G3 05/01 13:24 00'54 1 OK *8285 AUTO RX G3 05/01 13:26 01 '33 2 OK *8286 AUTO RX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG. , Inc. 05/01 13:48 01'42 3 OK *8288 AUTO RX G3 503 378 4317 05/01 14:47 00'55 1 OK *8289 AUTO RX G3 503 646 6286 05/01 14:52 02'07 3 OK *8291 AUTO RX G3 5034927564 05/01 15:13 01'06 1 OK AO-7 kik CITY OF TIGARD November 26, 1997 OREGON John Duncan Jadco Chemical Limited P.O. Box 230097 Portland, OR 97281-0097 Re: Minor Modification Request Approval Dear Mr. Duncan: This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification approval to construct a 500 square foot expansion. The expansion is to be in line with the existing office on the building located at 16055 SW 74th Avenue in the City of Tigard. The Director has approved this request based on an inspection of the property, the findings you provided and review of the modification criteria. It should be noted that the City of Tigard recently adopted a Water Resources Overlay District along Fanno Creek. Any additional building expansion beyond the existing foundation towards Fanno Creek would not be permitted based on the wetland's delineation that was provided during the construction of the recent building expansion on this property. To avoid any unnecessary delays when filing for building permits please provide a copy of this letter. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171 . Sincerely / 4 / - Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP i;!.curpinVnark_rliadmod.doc c: SDR 95-0014 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 November 13, 1997 RECEIVED NOV 14 1997 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Ha ll Blvd. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Application for Commercial Building Permit for an Addition to an existing office. To whom it may concern: I am contemplating a minor modification to an existing office structure. I have enclosed three copies of sketches for this modification. The objective is to increase the amount of office floor space to accommodate personnel currently working at Jadco Chemical Ltd. Jadco employs a total of twenty-two people at the present time. No codes would be violated and the modification is not major. It does not violate any of the following: 1. no additional on-site parking is required 2. no change in the type or use of the building 3 . building height will not increase 4 . no change in accessways will occur 5 . no increase in vehiculat traffic will result 6 . increase in square footage of the existing office will be less than 500. 7. no impact or effect on open space or greenways will occur Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposed modification. Please contact me at (503) 684-0044 if you have any questions regarding this request. Sincerely, g1/4- A. Duncan JD/jld F , i ,---- , . i FT0A,kt ) inAJ - ... A. Ig' • _ ; . C.D\IV\i) J.I , 1 . 1 - I - i 1 I ! I ! , , . ! 1 i . , . i . . 1 • I : ! , 1 1 1 . . I 1 i ILI , , ______. i 1 i I , , I i 1 L : ' , _____4 1 , t . Cec 111. . f )•.:. 17 .....1 6ieleeft i .t. . I I n 1 1 1 t . 7---- ! I I 1 1 i ! 1, . I I 1 I , , • . , 1 c...,,t;,,.\--0. • . ',. i 1 1 ' I ! . i , . 1 I 1 i 1 , ____ a • . ! II if i i i 1 i 1 I a ' 1 i . , i . V . , ' c4 . --. , . . 'L • ::E. E'f� °L,V r, _ in j ro 1` �. - ______r,,-, M y n1 K t roi StS, NA,n a a, . . - i - D+ , — I.'S I 3/4 Al ©vet' y. A - R-e2 1 1M. uv,c1 rot gx 1st; `i \ "/ 1 Ii -j ► } if----- (,- 511r , '• 1 E• - ;;-.)...k 6 f rat'i;vt j I ' 1 . v 1 2}C� S ;Ij 7 ` I I�-' }2x)y comcitte F66frhg, Fri . . . . / ...4-..... .......---■.. ___i_ ______ _____/_ rROPOSED g I \ BUILDING : 1 \ .1% • - . -. 1 \ \1 1 2 l 2 I F , I P PROJECT _� , 1-,i 50UNDAR.7 ` I -- -- . ! ! I / • 4P•■ i I / / _. 1 I EXISTING -- , I I 1 BOND EXTG. I - I rr ' i / 7 / r i r / 1 I r• r _ 1 / ! a i 1 EXISTI SIG CURES _•� f: t / I Z I z ) r: ,/ r 9 i IGOMPLE TE /i,i1 /1 SIDEWALPC TO �f' !! d 1 R.O.W. OF DURHAM 2 1 I ROAD. i SEE DETAIL /: / + / 3/G-1) r: r ii 1 1 r: r / 1 L__ ._ _ f ____ _ _ .- - - - Q SA. DURHAM ROAD -- - . \ / _ — - - — OVERALL SITE PLAN TAX MAP NO. 251 1 13AE3 1"•10O' TAX LOT NO. 800 6.64 AC.