Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1995-00008
SDR95 -00008 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATION CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0008 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATION APPLICATION: The applicant requests for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of five (5) buildings totalling approximately 180 , 000 square feet . Zone : I-P (Industrial Park) . Location: (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100) Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue . SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request s :bject to certain conditions . The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II . THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE MICHAEL ANDERSON OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 1 . The applicant shall obtain a public improvement permit for the construction of the proposed driveway aprons, concrete sidewalks, sanitary sewer, streetlights, and underground utilities to serve the site . Improvements shall be designed and constructed to City standards . STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept . (639-4171) 2 . Three (3 ) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE : these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements . STAFF CONTACT : John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 3 . The applicant shall obtain a permit from the City of Durham for the street end closure for SW Findlay Road, and provide a copy of the plans and permit to the City of Tigard Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept . (639-4171) 4 . The applicant shall provide a hydrology and hydraulic study of the proposed storm drain systems for approval of the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 1 Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 5 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47 . NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times . The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. 6 . The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage of SW 72nd Avenue, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639-4171) 7 . Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use . 8 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 9 . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings . The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February, 1994 . " STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 10 . The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. 11 . The applicant shall provide copies of the agreement with the adjoining property for the maintenance of the water quality facility serving both sites . An agreement shall also be obtained for the parking lot connection and access . 12 . As the site is adjacent to, or contains a designated Sensitive Area, the applicant should verify the location and meet the requirements of section 6 and 7 of R&O 91-47/91-75 13 . Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact : Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Impervious surface / landscape calculations . The minimum amount of landscaping shall be 20 percent . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 2 b. Screening of the parking area from SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue . c . Twenty-five (25) bicycle parking spaces . The applicant can provide one central location per building or distribute them within each tenant space, but shall provide a minimum of 5 per building. e . A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18 . 116 , Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage . The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance : Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- off . The applicant shall also provide written hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS : 14 . All site improvements shall be installed as per the approved revised site plans . IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1 . SECTION 18 . 160 . 170 Improvement Agreement A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall : 1 . Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2 . Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant . B . The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 3 2 . SECTION 18 . 160 . 180 Bond A. As required by Section 18 . 160 . 170 , the applicant shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1 . An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2 . A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3 . Cash. B . The applicant shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance . C. The applicant shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. D. 18 . 164 . 150 Installation : Prerequisite/Permit Fee 1 . No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. E . 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required 1 . Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . 2 . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. F. 18 . 164 . 200 Engineer' s Certification Required 1 . The applicant' s engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 4 grade, prior the City acceptance of the public works improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. 2 . The owner shall provide a Developer-Engineer Agreement as prescribed by the Public Improvement Design Standards, dated May 26, 1994 , which requires that the Project Engineer provide direct supervision and control, and primary inspection of the public works construction, and final certification to the City. 3 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS . Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II . FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . Backround: A Lot Line Adjustment (MIS 94-0029) was approved to adjust two parcels, creating the lot configuration for this proposed site development . No other land use or development applications regarding the subject parcel have been reviewed by the City of Tigard. 2 . Vicinity Information: The site is zoned I-P (Industrial Park) . Property to the east is zoned C-G (General Commercial) , property to the northeast is zoned I-L (Light Industrial) , property to the west is in the City of Durham and is zoned 0-P (Office Park) . The surrounding area is developed with a mix of commercial, residential and industrial uses . Property to the south contains a rock quarry and gravel pit . 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has frontage on SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue . The site was previously used as a Washington County rock quarry. The site has been filled. The site slopes towards the northwest with an elevation of approximately 183 at the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 5 southeast corner to an elevation of approximately 150 at the northwest corner. The applicant requests approval to construct five multi-tenant industrial warehouse buildings totalling approximately 180, 000 square feet . Access will be provided via two driveways onto SW Durham Road. 4 . Other Staff Comments : The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : The applicant is proposing to direct storm water to a water quality pond on the adjoining property. The applicant shall provide easements and documentation that the existing pond facility can adequately accomodate the additional water. 5 . Agency Comments : The Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : 1) Site is adjacent to, or contains a designated Sensitive Area. Applicant should verify location and meet the requirements of section 6 and 7 of R&O 91-47/91-75; 2) A water quality facility is required in accordance with the above named R&O. Detailed design and plans for this facility should be submitted with development construction permit application; 3) The proposed sanitary sewer extension through the site should be public and centered in an easement acceptable to the City; 4) Copy of the detailed grading and Erosion Control Plan should be forwarded to the Agency by the City of Tigard, upon issuance of the appropriate permits; 5) Detailed hydraulic and hydrological analysis of proposed and existing storm system should be provided to ensure downstream conveyance is adequate to accept additional storm flows . Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : ODOT recommends a traffic study be performed to determine the impacts to the I-5 interchange located at Lower Boones Ferry Rd. This traffic study will also need to show the impacts to the Beaverton-Tualatin Highway which is classified as a District Highway in the Oregon Highway Plan. General Telephone and Electronics has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : Developer to provide conduit to GTE' s specifications inside the development . The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division, City of Tigard Police Department, Tigard Water Department, City of Tualatin, NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 6 Portland General Electric, Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections . No other comments have been recieved. SECTION III . ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS : Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build five multi-tenant industrial buildings . The design of the buildings suggests the predominant use will be warehouse and office use . These uses are permitted uses within the I-P zoning district . Any other future use shall comply with permitted uses in the I-P zone . Minimum Lot Area: Section 18 . 68 . 050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the I-P zoning district . The site has an average lot width of approximately 480 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the I-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping except that 20% can be provided when: 1) Street trees are installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than two inches at four feet in height; 2) The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of ten feet; and 3) All applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied. The applicant has not indicated the amount of area to be landscaped. Impervious surface / landscape calculations shall be submitted which indicates compliance with this section. The landscape plans show street trees with a minimum 3 inch caliper and a landscape buffer of 10 feet, thereby qualifying for a minimum 20 percent landscape coverage. Setbacks : Section 18 . 68 . 050 states that the front yard setback is 35 feet and that on corner lots the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet on any lot facing a street . As indicated on the site plan, the proposal meets the setback requirements . The maximum building height is 45 feet . The applicant is proposing the following building heights : building #186 - 32 feet; #187, #188, #189 - 25 feet; and #190 - 24 feet . As indicated on the preliminary plans, the proposed heights are well under the maximum allowed. Landscaping Plan: Section 18 . 100 . 015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs . Street Trees : Section 18 . 100 . 033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 7 18 . 100 . 035 . Section 18 . 100 . 035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large) . The landscape plans shows the provision of 25 red sunset maple trees spaced approximately 35 feet apart, satisfying this criteria. Screening: Special Provisions : Section 18 . 100 . 110 (A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas . Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees . Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect . The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the landscape plan, parking lot trees are provided which will provide the required canopy effect . A revised plan shall shall be submitted which indicates how the parking area shall be screened from SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue . Visual Clearance Areas : Section 18 . 102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height . The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed) . A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line . As indicated on the site plan this requirement will be satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18 . 106 . 030 . (D) (2) requires 1 space per 1000 square feet for warehouse use plus 1 space per 200 square feet of office area. Using warehouse as the most likely use results in a total of approximately 180 parking spaces . The site plan shows the provision of 378 parking spaces . Parking has been provided at a ratio of 1 space per 476 square feet . Since this proposal will allow for multi-tenant use, the applicant shall be responsible for maintaining adequate provision for parking as required in Section 18 . 106 . 020 (E) . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 8 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) , which became effective on January 26, 1992 , requires that the number of disabled parking spaces shall be 8 spaces when 301 to 400 spaces are provided. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 16 disabled person parking spaces distributed throughout the site, thereby satisfying this requirement . Bicycle Parking: Section 18 . 106 .020 (P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development . Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways . Twenty-five (25) bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development . The applicant' s statement notes that bicycle parking will be provided within each of the tenant warehouse spaces . Since 25 spaces are required, bicycle parking shall be distributed so that 5 spaces are provided for each building at a minimum. A revised plan shall be submitted which indicates the location of the minimum required bicycle parking spaces . The applicant can provide one central location per building or distribute them within each tenant space, but shall provide a minimum of 5 per building. Access : Section 18 . 108 . 080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which requires more than 100 parking spaces provide two accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet . In addition, curbs are required as well as a five foot sidewalk. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of 2 access points onto SW Durham Road, with 40 foot access widths, thereby satisfying this requirement . The plan shows the parking lot to connect with the lot to the north. An agreement shall be submitted for joint access and maintenance of this connection. Walkways : Section 18 . 108 . 050 (A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress . As indicated on the site plans, walkway connections are provided from the buildings to the street . Signs : Section 18 . 114 . 130 (F) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P zone . Section 18 . 114 . 130 (G) (d) contains other requirements which apply to industrial zones and industrial parks . This section limits industrial parks to a single signing format . The proposed buildings are entitled to wall signage but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage : Section 18 . 116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 9 of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers . The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off . The applicant shall submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. The applicant shall also provide written approval from the hauler regarding facility location and equipment compatibility. Tree Removal : Section 18 . 150 contains standards for obtaining a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18 . 164 . 030 (E) (1) (a) (Streets) , 18 . 164 . 090 (Sanitary Sewer) , and 18 . 164 . 100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1 . TRAFFIC: The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis prepared by MacKenzie Engineering Inc . , dated March 15, 1995 . The report provides a projection of the traffic to be generated by the proposed site development and an analysis of the effects of the traffic on the existing signalized street intersections of SW Durham Road with both SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue . Based on the data collected and the estimated trip distribution, the report indicates that the projected traffic should have minimal effect and that the existing facilities and street improvements at each intersection are adequate . The Level of Service at the SW Durham Road/SW Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection would remain at Level C and the SW Durham Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection would lower to Level D. The latter intersection included the projected traffic for the Mega Foods site approved in 1994 for a site on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue. 2 . STREETS : The site plan shows access to SW Durham Road, an arterial street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan, with two driveways . No access is proposed to SW 72nd Avenue, a Major Collector. Both streets have been constructed to their appropriate street standard with the exception of sidewalk construction. The applicant should construct sidewalk along the entire street frontage of the site . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 10 The site also connects to the end of SW Findlay Road, at the southwesterly corner of the site, and the applicant indicates that this road could not be extended easterly due to the topographic constraints of the site and properties to the south. SW Findlay Road presently extends westerly in the adjoining City of Durham, to an intersection with SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, providing access to three residences and two small businesses . Due to the both the topography and the change in use, staff concurs with the applicant . However, the street end design should be approved and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Durham. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along the site frontage of SW 72nd Avenue, and the applicant should place the facilities located along the street frontage underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 3 . SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Durham Road. The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development. The applicant proposes to construct the sewer crossing the site to the southerly boundary to City standards with the possible dedication of the system to the City. The work should be included within the public improvement permit for the site. Minimum City easement shall be 15 feet wide . 4 . STORM SEWER: The site slopes to the northwest and sheet flows onto the adjacent property into an existing pond that was designed to receive the storm water from the site development of this contiguous parcel . This facility should be maintained by the owner. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The applicant' s proposed facility on the adjoining parcel will comply with these regulations and should be maintained by the property owner. The applicant should provide copies of the maintenance agreement for the water quality facility for approval by the Engineering Department prior to recording. SECTION V. PROCEDURE NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 11 1 , at Clt N°tic `Xx. The a Y Ha11 and wmaipublish ea S poe t and o 1 ed to:ed in the new 2. Affec ed 9.o d Ci 1 2 z h n t sAa`ber, poste p er en the d "'2LE cisies nment agn�ie emnt Ted disc 3, 44 .+ SS AP DECIS2©N s Team Repre ent Se ct 81°n lAn Any t Is FILED SJ ,L BE pIN a ti ve h1ch 18 3 c°rda to th O S Y Re aes hat °f c thei th seclsion ma ON 6�/�95 O and sell rd c°rd e l third tnnapLini t.Y De32. 29 eat th . The de n. lty Hall sched!� days aft must b°pm nt and 4, adline for f1.42.49. ` 131251 Stand fOrms°tioe is d th Ha Tig rd°ns, I of an a 11 1Vd, availab en City Hall anningyDu have Ppe$j i$ 3+3 Tl9.arde d7/ e que o 13125 SW H I1 nt X639 s, ple A.�. 6j14/95 -t-C' ai 41 ase \�� PREPARED Cry d Ti9ar Citcall ci t BY: d, O2 °f T Y °f ASSi s D eg°n 9 5a3 d m r istant P da e e i nn r 6/1/95 APPROVED $�,, DATE Rlch e�D. . Senior n.e ersdo f ner f 6/1/95 DATE NOTICE Op DEC ISION SDR 95 0008 PACT pIC REALT Y PACE 22 9ZOSSZ w.r S M• 44 ma. • NOD380•081(911 NYId 83151(11 SS3NISf18 01313Yd A se/och.das 110 a311V1ar18 8v ....en:VT ISAM ILIZ M Ca'=3 pY.1n..+1•10 W a •.I 1..s. `tiw 10.01 1i�ia mso aW1...1..• • •an.V.wm34 o MUM.1•21 Y` S.e•'1`wwiw 11a7.11014 •••00 M.2.080mo 1D•.w.. • ■•.O••w••••••••P,IIROMITO w..• 1 •` iie idax,msw`•n r° • an.amend . 110 r.•w .w of 100 1•101.•moon MOM 0•O IA„7.a•`• 4 000.13_13 Ewa m1Y • 8310N'TAMED r.srs 1.•w s•.•w. • aN3O31 LA••• •.•.•a• ONENd n ONIlviva RIB •r 03$s•• ••ammo•w w••.•..J• 'ar 13•1.5,16•M. Jd OM 111 1_r••.••w.$ s•••.11••••••.••.v• • SM•�I.A d.W•••••••• —r'F.•s F•1••. -•r—•••••s FN..n.r.••wl —r yam as w swan ww sass ven .w ral s•s 1•011•.1 F.sa rS•me••• rep Y•s•.s.ssa a s w MOM.Om.MN - 1 •.r was s.w.ow roe•r• -•r—F.• ....•a.1 s w••.•.a ••r— 105 IN la•O••••0•w••••••r w.a. 0- 831ONA3I r � a J �_Z N Ili C �_ 1 d , '1 D K> m irp.: `.FTON LAN I p W ;a/1IIIIIIII�-' c NNE �■ c� nikm— o III a II .. 1 w a. ;U 0 11.4g < ,,,,„,,..., ~ c,_ ill -4. ",,,,,, � >_ 0) Z ° , 0 9,L .,..„- 1, . ‘ 111111111 LCJ "ilk- I-- 111111 A. #■._ VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: T NO'TH SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) Scale 1"-400' FEET 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY 0 400 800 1.4:\GISDAT\TIGCOV\NELSDWG\SXN13 3/13/93 REQUEs T PoR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 0 4 1995 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS a CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: General Telephone, Engineering Office DATE: May 2, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315 Phone:(503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY • A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five (5) multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100). ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services,public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: D - vELloPE TO I ,DE colq.Dv(T/M41JN0L-ES �E ATE 5 S��C�F IC4Ti OBI S (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: N;i^1- Phone Number: (/ 62C-9 SDP 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY May 2.1995 RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 0 8 1995 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 'k CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Dave Scott, Building Official DATE: May 2, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315 Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY • A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five (5) multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100). ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: l Q\1\1\''QIIVX\Vcs \ \/\( \ ■ 0,1`1)\ cO\ 64_ 13■A. 111`5\ CPO 1;4 `�� � W•I`NAZ,N a�\alp (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: 10\\14 ., Phone Number: S\\ SDR 95-0008 ` MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY May 2,1995 V '..,_____.../ ` fig 00� w «',F" I z il JQQ N PS o c _ 1� a K l0 rt II .fl O LANE o w 1/1111111111111/ ° w Z I ,p FIN ST co Z w a w I . J a MI w ° \!61111 cc or4a toils in .. 4 L./if' a LI • 4 , r.-- • 0 411 E- e t 0oOG I V • VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: 0 NO'TH SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) Scale 1":400' FEET 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY 0 400 800 M\GISOAT\TIGCOV\NELSOWG\S%NA 3/13/a5 aA� a ,l i � , • 'At z .� ' f '1 '�./ is " _ 11 N 1 ,,1,, . $I/ :a �� Q' o ,--_2.1 .II' PI 1!9 td p 4 UN�� •II,. LJ / f:.i , �� . — —• . e 1 ow [I v i r, , O o.. f 0 FGF?f••- rC�r dd1 1►�i y311 � lUll • �' 11J� ter' I l 11 M MI t } !!� ai id ! fa i s •j team.v II 0 S1P ep141" fi P=4 e t °. 1 e ;ass: •i I e� ,� 11 Lj • •11 �' ' o=� e III e ■1 I� o eon IN .c.4 �� I o o, t. 4 ° } it /14., . .....; .... ° J '' i r r. a _l I 11.1 9',''F'4,,4.t0. %..i / 1 el 0,., ,,,,. 7 t.... . .ki-tat ' " . 10,1 0 I- i oi#41! ,.."1 if . . . ,O G r . i : i: 1 :aE. t - `∎ bra,., ql I , 55�O O 4 I ________ is M . E , sq hR q k a @ 9 i. i i it ItIk4 . ;11r 1 Y , ►E> t K • ' ;! ! ! I i a=.i ! ; t �`k }AEIit !`S Eg!! ss; 3 3 s ''� c I� 4d fd ; a i ¢ � i izipEe igg $ e ib 1 E ff•G pp�I Y > •1 v q ° A IiGiAE i �� o:. 2� ` d �y�Ei 9� A itii�� 4aeA � �i: ji� d } 5 ..i g e c e e e e 11 wE F -_ I Iiii 11 d .I 101111p: 3iflimf -@ a1 6 ml; Ad Na ,: !,e6 Zoe 111 / i_.F Iiiiii!le 3 /11 IIA g e s 1. i $t F s 1 ioli 4 1 E i :.iii! 'ae 1s ii i d g q ill - 3 Ai 0 8 C 1 C :1 �-�R�� PACIFIC BUSINESS CENTER YACKENZIE ENWNEERING INCORPORATED F. q 71' s SI7E PLAN MASTER PLAN .ZI"7�.„ r- TIGARD. OREGON RECEIVED PLANNING 404 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MAY (' 8 1995 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Portland General Electric, Brian Moore DATE: May 2, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315 Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY • A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five (5) multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100). ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: kWe have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: l��tP3 11( Z e3- --9S Phone Number: €- k t-c17,1 SDR 950008 / MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY May 2,1995 F , RECEIVED PLANNING r; of MAY 0 9 1995 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY May 8, 1995 Will D'Andrea Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Will : Subject : SDR 95-0008 Mackenzie Pacific Realty Please consider the following comments when writing your conditions of approval for the above named project : 1 . Site is adjacent to, or contains a designated Sensitive Area. Applicant should verify location and meet the requirements of Sections 6 and 7 of R&O 91-47/91-75 . 2 . A water quality facility is required in accordance with the above named R&O. Detailed design and plans for this facility should be submitted with development construction permit application. 3 . The proposed sanitary sewer extension through the site should be public and centered in an easement acceptable to the City. 4 . Copy of the detailed Grading and Erosion Control Plan should be forwarded to the Agency by the City of Tigard, upon issuance of the appropriate permits . 5 . Detailed hydraulic and hydrological analysis of proposed and existing storm system should be provided to ensure downstream conveyance is adequate to accept additional storm flows . I hope the above is information is of assistance to you. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call at 648-8678 . Since ely, ‘.4.) 4A-A7.----- Lee Walker Design and Plan Review Supervisor /eb 155 North First Avenue,Suite 270 Phone:503/648-8621 Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 / FAX:503/640-3525 • I RECEIVED PLANNING Oregon May 10, 1995 MAY 12 1995 Tigard Planning Department DEPARTMENT OF City of Tigard TRANSPORTATION 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Region I Attention: Will D'Andrea FILE CODE: Subject: SDR 95-0008 McKenzie/Pacific Realty Will, ODOT appreciates the opportunity to comment on this Development Review located at the Southwest corner of S.W. Durham Road and S.W. 72nd Avenue. Although this site does not directly access a state highway, the large size (approximately 180,000 sq. ft.) and number of parking spaces (346) does raise some ODOT concerns. ODOT would like to submit the following comments: • ODOT recommends a traffic study be performed to determine the impacts to the 1-5 Interchange located at Lower Boones Ferry Rd. This traffic study will also need to show the impacts to the Beaverton-Tualatin Highway which is classified as a District Highway in the Oregon Highway Plan. Thank you for providing ODOT with the opportunity to provide comments on this land use action. If you have any questions, please call me at 731-8534. Craig Lee Development Revi w Planner (A, i cc: Laurie Nicholson Sam Hunaidi, District 2A ,f .. :•4. 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 734-1850(11-94) ,.'' FAX (503) 731-8259 05/10/95 09:05 125037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 0 001/001 Post-It"brand fax transmittal mer '1 #of pages► , ORO t rld/'et\ Fro. ,r 0 p won Dept. Phone* 3t .. 8S-34.-/ May 10, 1995 Fax# Fax* Tigard Planning Department f s`"4 ' S t et. CMENT OF City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard RECEIVED PLANNING TRANSPORTATION Tigard, OR 97223 Resion 1 MAY 10 1995 Attention: Will D'Andrea FILE CODE: Subject: SDR 95-0008 McKenzie/Pacific Realty VViill, ODOT appreciates the opportunity to comment on this Development Review located at the Southwest corner of S.W. Durham Road and S.W. 72nd Avenue. Although this site does not directly access a state highway, the large size (approximately 180,000 sq. ft.) and number of parking spaces (346) does raise some ODOT concerns. ODOT would like to submit the following comments: • ODOT recommends a traffic study be performed to determine the impacts to the 1-5 Interchange located at Lower Boones Ferry Rd. This traffic study will also need to show the impacts to the Beaverton-Tualatin Highway which is classified as a District Highway in the Oregon Highway Plan., Thank you for providing ODOT with the opportunity to provide comments on this land use action. If you have any questions, please call me at 731-8534. Craig Lee Development Revi w Planner cc: Laurie Nicholson Sam Hunaidi, District 2A • 123 NW Flanders Portland, OP.972094037 (503) 731-8200 FAX(503) 731-8259 7'344850(11-9a) REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: John Acker, Field Operations DATE: May 2, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315 Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY ■ A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five (5) multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100). ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff • •• and r• all endation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the ear fut yf ou wi a co' ment on this application,WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: a nda - Februar 20 1995. Yo may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to retu your comments. If ou are u a . •le to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact not-• above with your comm • .: and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any • • •• • • : e Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. Oeljr /36C- ill PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ /h We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. S Cr- Please contact of our office. 61-Ger 14-A--Please refer to the enclosed letter. 734e K 41 I4•) — Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: _kl------ Phone Number: LZ SDR 960008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY May 2,1995 RECEIVED PLANNING • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MAY 0 9 1995 4 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: City of Tualatin, Planning Director DATE: Mav 2, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315 Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY • A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five (5) multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100). ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PL EASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I// We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting. j �c, e�bnra,- Phone Number: (ij,? SDP 950008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALM May 2.1995 Mgt'W me El rf 11111 ♦ / a /.p!Ep MEW 2 m 0 Z b_< rn ` i \ 641 <‘ 002 F 0'A° E6 1-1 \ o Mr 0 D a�,o� as V VHana . • edit& [C-) FP 72ND AVER• H � cn ATE rn RsT I 1 ro H '� A 5 H g n A � diktik m AIM ' Aa ' CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. •'"1l 411, 4410 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Per Attached DATE: May 2, 1995 FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315 Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY • A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five (5) multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100). ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - February 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: SDR 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY May 2,1995 REQUEST FOR COMMEN ATION LIST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APP_IL.. IONS I CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS ,/ {circle o v CIT Area: (N) (S) E (C) " Placed for review in ❑brary CIT Book " --CPO NO. CITY DEPARTMENTS Building Official/Dave Scott Police/Kelly Jennings ' eld Operations/John Acker _City Recorder/Cathy Wheatley :-/Engineenng/Michael Anderson _Permits Facilitator/Jerree Gaynor Advanced Planning/Carol Lardsrran ,Water Department/Michael Miller .`'SPECIAL DISTRICTS /i Fire Marshall L/Unified Sewerage Agency _Tualatin Valley Water District Wa.County Fire District SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 (pick-up box) 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wa. Co. Dept. of Land Use&Transportation _Boundary Commission _METRO-GREENSPACES PROGRAM 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#16,Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland,OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland.OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) _State Highway Division _Jim Tice(lGA'S) Sam Hunaidi ZODOT/Region 1 _Mike Borreson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Transportation Planning _Scott Kng (CPA's) Portland,OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders ✓om Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland.OR 97209-4037 Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _Oregon DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1 175 Court Street,N.E. _Other City of Beaverton Salem,OR 97310-0590 Jim Hendryx-Principal Planner _Ctty of Portland PC Box 4755 City of Durham Planning Director Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland,OR 97204 _City of IGng City Tigard,OR 97281-3483 City Manager _City of Lake Oswego 15300 SW 116th VCity of Tualatin City Manager IGng City,OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin,OR 97062 Lake Oswego.OR 97034 I SPECIAE AGENCIES : ............... ✓ General Telephone ZPbrtland General Electric _Columbia Cable Engineering Office Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road 14200 SW Bngadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 ZW Natural Gcs —Metro Area Communications/Jason Hewitt Tn-Met Transit Development Scott Palmer Twin Oaks Technology Center Kim Knox.Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland.OR 97232 _TCI Cablevision of Oregon _US West Communications —Southern Pacific Transportation Co. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney.PLS- Project Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Avenue Room 324,Union Station Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97209 STATE:AGENCIES —Aeroncutics Division(ODOT) —Division of State Lands _US Postal Service —Commerce Dept. -M.H. Park —Fish&Wildlife Randy Hammock,Growth Coordinator —PUC —DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station Dept.of Environ. Quality Portland.OR 97229-9998 FEpFRAL AGENC1£S Corps. of Engineers _Other n\IOQin\po,Iv\rto'ofC.rre A • CITY OF TIGARD OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: X That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: X City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 1st day of June, 1995; said NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the 1st day of lune, 1995 and deposited in the United States Mail on the 1st day of lune, 1995, postage prepaid. i, ii-e ,- - • 'C- j.epared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / ay of 19/c / .0.7,. -ei-F6-AL-sifia. - ,,, a/m.e ynN.,144-4_) f t NOTARY PU 'Lic-OREGON i NOTARY PUBLIC /�REG N �' xF1RE$ F�. 7. 3,9f My Commission Expires: ~,ems« 1 k e- e , <r FILE INFO.: (NOTICE OF DIRECTOR'S DECISION SDR 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATION EXHIBIT A . CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0008 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATION APPLICATION: The applicant requests for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of five (5) buildings totalling approximately 180, 000 square feet . Zone : I-P (Industrial Park) . Location: (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100) Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions . The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II . THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE MICHAEL ANDERSON OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 1 . The applicant shall obtain a public improvement permit for the construction of the proposed driveway aprons, concrete sidewalks, sanitary sewer, streetlights, and underground utilities to serve the site . Improvements shall be designed and constructed to City standards . STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson,Engineering Dept . (639-4171) 2 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 3 . The applicant shall obtain a permit from the City of Durham for the street end closure for SW Findlay Road, and provide a copy of the plans and permit to the City of Tigard Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept . (639-4171) 4 . The applicant shall provide a hydrology and hydraulic study of the proposed storm drain systems for approval of the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 1 Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 5 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47 . NOTE : This is a two part fee which is paid at different times . The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. 6 . The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage of SW 72nd Avenue, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639-4171) 7 . Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 94-18 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. 8 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 9 . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings . The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February, 1994 . " STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 10 . The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. 11 . The applicant shall provide copies of the agreement with the adjoining property for the maintenance of the water quality facility serving both sites . An agreement shall also be obtained for the parking lot connection and access . 12 . As the site is adjacent to, or contains a designated Sensitive Area, the applicant should verify the location and meet the requirements of section 6 and 7 of R&O 91-47/91-75 13 . Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact : Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Impervious surface / landscape calculations . The minimum amount of landscaping shall be 20 percent . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 2 b. Screening of the parking area from SW Durham Road and • SW 72nd Avenue . c . Twenty-five (25) bicycle parking spaces . The applicant can provide one central location per building or distribute them within each tenant space, but shall provide a minimum of 5 per building. e . A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18 . 116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage . The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance : Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- off . The applicant shall also provide written hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS : 14 . All site improvements shall be installed as per the approved revised site plans . IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1 . SECTION 18 . 160 . 170 Improvement Agreement A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall : 1 . Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2 . Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant . B . The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 3 2 . SECTION 18 . 160 . 180 Bond A. As required by Section 18 . 160 . 170, the applicant shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1 . An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2 . A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3 . Cash. B. The applicant shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance . C. The applicant shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. D. 18 . 164 . 150 Installation: Prerequisite/Permit Fee 1 . No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. E. 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required 1 . Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . 2 . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. F. 18 . 164 . 200 Engineer' s Certification Required 1 . The applicant' s engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 4 grade, prior the City acceptance of the public works improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance . 2 . The owner shall provide a Developer-Engineer Agreement as prescribed by the Public Improvement Design Standards, dated May 26, 1994, which requires that the Project Engineer provide direct supervision and control, and primary inspection of the public works construction, and final certification to the City. 3 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II . FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . Backround: A Lot Line Adjustment (MIS 94-0029) was approved to adjust two parcels, creating the lot configuration for this proposed site development . No other land use or development applications regarding the subject parcel have been reviewed by the City of Tigard. 2 . Vicinity Information: The site is zoned I-P (Industrial Park) . Property to the east is zoned C-G (General Commercial) , property to the northeast is zoned I-L (Light Industrial) , property to the west is in the City of Durham and is zoned 0-P (Office Park) . The surrounding area is developed with a mix of commercial, residential and industrial uses . Property to the south contains a rock quarry and gravel pit . 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has frontage on SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. The site was previously used as a Washington County rock quarry. The site has been filled. The site slopes towards the northwest with an elevation of approximately 183 at the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 5 southeast corner to an elevation of approximately 150 at the northwest corner. The applicant requests approval to construct five multi-tenant industrial warehouse buildings totalling approximately 180, 000 square feet . Access will be provided via two driveways onto SW Durham Road. 4 . Other Staff Comments : The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : The applicant is proposing to direct storm water to a water quality pond on the adjoining property. The applicant shall provide easements and documentation that the existing pond facility can adequately accomodate the additional water. 5 . Agency Comments : The Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: 1) Site is adjacent to, or contains a designated Sensitive Area. Applicant should verify location and meet the requirements of section 6 and 7 of R&O 91-47/91-75; 2) A water quality facility is required in accordance with the above named R&O. Detailed design and plans for this facility should be submitted with development construction permit application; 3) The proposed sanitary sewer extension through the site should be public and centered in an easement acceptable to the City; 4) Copy of the detailed grading and Erosion Control Plan should be forwarded to the Agency by the City of Tigard, upon issuance of the appropriate permits; 5) Detailed hydraulic and hydrological analysis of proposed and existing storm system should be provided to ensure downstream conveyance is adequate to accept additional storm flows. Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : ODOT recommends a traffic study be performed to determine the impacts to the I-5 interchange located at Lower Boones Ferry Rd. This traffic study will also need to show the impacts to the Beaverton-Tualatin Highway which is classified as a District Highway in the Oregon Highway Plan. General Telephone and Electronics has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments : Developer to provide conduit to GTE' s specifications inside the development . The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division, City of Tigard Police Department, Tigard Water Department, City of Tualatin, NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 6 Portland General Electric, Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections . No other comments have been recieved. SECTION III . ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS : Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build five multi-tenant industrial buildings . The design of the buildings suggests the predominant use will be warehouse and office use . These uses are permitted uses within the I-P zoning district . Any other future use shall comply with permitted uses in the I-P zone. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18 . 68 . 050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the I-P zoning district . The site has an average lot width of approximately 480 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the I-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping except that 20o can be provided when: 1) Street trees are installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than two inches at four feet in height; 2) The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of ten feet; and 3) All applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied. The applicant has not indicated the amount of area to be landscaped. Impervious surface / landscape calculations shall be submitted which indicates compliance with this section. The landscape plans show street trees with a minimum 3 inch caliper and a landscape buffer of 10 feet, thereby qualifying for a minimum 20 percent landscape coverage . Setbacks : Section 18 . 68 . 050 states that the front yard setback is 35 feet and that on corner lots the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet on any lot facing a street . As indicated on the site plan, the proposal meets the setback requirements. The maximum building height is 45 feet . The applicant is proposing the following building heights : building #186 - 32 feet; #187, #188, #189 - 25 feet; and #190 - 24 feet . As indicated on the preliminary plans, the proposed heights are well under the maximum allowed. Landscaping Plan: Section 18 . 100 . 015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs . Street Trees : Section 18 . 100 . 033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 7 18 . 100 . 035 . Section 18 . 100 . 035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large) . The landscape plans shows the provision of 25 red sunset maple trees spaced approximately 35 feet apart, satisfying this criteria. Screening: Special Provisions : Section 18 . 100 . 110 (A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas . Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees . Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect . The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the landscape plan, parking lot trees are provided which will provide the required canopy effect . A revised plan shall shall be submitted which indicates how the parking area shall be screened from SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue . Visual Clearance Areas : Section 18 . 102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height . The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed) . A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan this requirement will be satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18 . 106 . 030 . (D) (2) requires 1 space per 1000 square feet for warehouse use plus 1 space per 200 square feet of office area. Using warehouse as the most likely use results in a total of approximately 180 parking spaces . The site plan shows the provision of 378 parking spaces . Parking has been provided at a ratio of 1 space per 476 square feet . Since this proposal will allow for multi-tenant use, the applicant shall be responsible for maintaining adequate provision for parking as required in Section 18 . 106 . 020 (E) . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 8 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) , which became effective on January 26, 1992 , requires that the number of disabled parking spaces shall be 8 spaces when 301 to 400 spaces are provided. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 16 disabled person parking spaces distributed throughout the site, thereby satisfying this requirement . Bicycle Parking: Section 18 . 106 . 020 (P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development . Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways . Twenty-five (25) bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development . The applicant' s statement notes that bicycle parking will be provided within each of the tenant warehouse spaces . Since 25 spaces are required, bicycle parking shall be distributed so that 5 spaces are provided for each building at a minimum. A revised plan shall be submitted which indicates the location of the minimum required bicycle parking spaces. The applicant can provide one central location per building or distribute them within each tenant space, but shall provide a minimum of 5 per building. Access : Section 18 . 108 . 080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which requires more than 100 parking spaces provide two accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet . In addition, curbs are required as well as a five foot sidewalk. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of 2 access points onto SW Durham Road, with 40 foot access widths, thereby satisfying this requirement . The plan shows the parking lot to connect with the lot to the north. An agreement shall be submitted for joint access and maintenance of this connection. Walkways : Section 18 . 108 . 050 (A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress . As indicated on the site plans, walkway connections are provided from the buildings to the street . Signs : Section 18 . 114 . 130 (F) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P zone . Section 18 . 114 . 130 (G) (d) contains other requirements which apply to industrial zones and industrial parks. This section limits industrial parks to a single signing format . The proposed buildings are entitled to wall signage but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage : Section 18 . 116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 9 of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers . The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance : Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off . The applicant shall submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. The applicant shall also provide written approval from the hauler regarding facility location and equipment compatibility. Tree Removal : Section 18 . 150 contains standards for obtaining a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. B . PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS : Sections 18 . 164 . 030 (E) (1) (a) (Streets) , 18 . 164 . 090 (Sanitary Sewer) , and 18 . 164 . 100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1 . TRAFFIC: The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis prepared by MacKenzie Engineering Inc . , dated March 15, 1995 . The report provides a projection of the traffic to be generated by the proposed site development and an analysis of the effects of the traffic on the existing signalized street intersections of SW Durham Road with both SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue. Based on the data collected and the estimated trip distribution, the report indicates that the projected traffic should have minimal effect and that the existing facilities and street improvements at each intersection are adequate . The Level of Service at the SW Durham Road/SW Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection would remain at Level C and the SW Durham Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection would lower to Level D. The latter intersection included the projected traffic for the Mega Foods site approved in 1994 for a site on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue . 2 . STREETS: The site plan shows access to SW Durham Road, an arterial street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan, with two driveways . No access is proposed to SW 72nd Avenue, a Major Collector. Both streets have been constructed to their appropriate street standard with the exception of sidewalk construction. The applicant should construct sidewalk along the entire street frontage of the site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 10 The site also connects to the end of SW Findlay Road, at the . southwesterly corner of the site, and the applicant indicates that this road could not be extended easterly due to the topographic constraints of the site and properties to the south. SW Findlay Road presently extends westerly in the adjoining City of Durham, to an intersection with SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, providing access to three residences and two small businesses. Due to the both the topography and the change in use, staff concurs with the applicant . However, the street end design should be approved and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Durham. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along the site frontage of SW 72nd Avenue, and the applicant should place the facilities located along the street frontage underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 3 . SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Durham Road. The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development . The applicant proposes to construct the sewer crossing the site to the southerly boundary to City standards with the possible dedication of the system to the City. The work should be included within the public improvement permit for the site. Minimum City easement shall be 15 feet wide . 4 . STORM SEWER: The site slopes to the northwest and sheet flows onto the adjacent property into an existing pond that was designed to receive the storm water from the site development of this contiguous parcel . This facility should be maintained by the owner. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The applicant' s proposed facility on the adjoining parcel will comply with these regulations and should be maintained by the property owner. The applicant should provide copies of the maintenance agreement for the water quality facility for approval by the Engineering Department prior to recording. SECTION V. PROCEDURE NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 11 1 . Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies 2 . Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 6/14/95 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3 . Appeal : Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 . 32 . 290 (A) and Section 18 . 32 . 370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent . Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. 6/14/95 4 . Questions : If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171) , City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223 /11-66a4A4 DC,6-CeVa 6/1/95 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner .?.�t)Q�Ji 6/1/95 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95 - 0008 PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 12 1111 S \\\\\000�� Q . 11111111 .0 N C I D 3 `.ETON CAN I O W 0. 111111111111 I I 1 L 0 lop EA. 0 M 0 W / z FlN•LAY �T Mp W w Q 4 4 J 2 w Om 644 < MIL= 0 r111,11.11 CC Elk 4 pa a i= rs LL 0 ,_ �QO � � z1,44 U>_ kb._ ,,c's A■#A111■&. ■4L VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: III No•TH SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) Scale 1°=aoo• FEET 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY 0 400 800 IA,\GISDAT\TIGCOV\NELSDWG\SXN13 3/13/93 l I I , ! \I. J{`` I I SHE DATA Ir.a • A w. fai V. I, i. I ]V tt V ii)) ,_.... 0 (III N as V. -AI n I ©,/T O . I 2V. . • — uo v. ii Y I V"....":. 'P a,"""... II d R La O O O O Pw.r� V W iff, 1 I "C `°°MOP NO � ° ,� "' ! I _I.:!.__0".h. 1 s.*** - ' e° 3_...-----......„,.......:,...... ...--........„___p . I III. 8S57R. . IlEi P11 J ® = O •ME 43: ° I1111111111Mi in MI NO- ' el it �- - b- . .4__ar ,VS CC rnnrn .ol Imo s, - Y • Edui"...nus 4. ' ff a S r O IIV.• VIOTI 0120.1 f 1 LJ gr,sw :1 I hl.o r AL" L..".1 IL: o 0 °"74: 1 i Z �PwP annolMMO vaiiiii, •_= CI �O vl° t - o °I . a I GENERAL NOTES gr�..k,. ��• 1 I .Oou Ar:S MK Ill 0100001111.0O s MI IM M OTT a°wr�mriar lb , 0 00 R''8'bo 0101.•o u•r..r IMAM oo'•oc SrtE PLAN =WIN ...o.w r.. u.w.m n c...rte..rc..s "elk, .a.OWL IWO IMO COCO(OWL c o ro���_o w KEYNOTES .11..... .< WV° ■r a C- ..Pan i.P a or isa i aw • M: .pa m w rcs ea,s/MT no• _` a____am P Isl.Pr.r OM via Wawa,taw ,_ .r NC001.WOO 1 WOO p•1�. n`Ci:,aMC. MIN o•a rP Op.ar.i WY Ja_ �—• -�T■ _� --. .a 10111 01•.01• v asr m®iis�..am.o iu riei6a°�.°w.i v.'bi. ■ a •rf ..w si...r.arver a Ss....."—All, .a r..AT.n -b tau w '�.�"■��.,; � ..........v u.rw 1101 w..w wsm al n W.lee..v Ina. 'w` 1•10LOOK ONO FIT POW.j l I \=' .cvv wi.w wrav.r v a•r.../ i`KM.MOW rr .o.a�" •awry••P••n••v P,...�_ 1� i� - %4111;_ :. .� ��— r l _ Pr Pl al•..J— t ewe�.Y MONO w r•a¢fit a1.1 ruYweryN•0[ ii 1. W ;.,�iti"-#, :f..P..wr....l Ie..u.i.l.1. w. al._OW.a.,IX11w..P .� � _+• 1f l'I a rw•IMMO ilea r ••worn wowf rwI fl.n.t.r.ai Mp. r PI \Y� u 4.w w r.i coven N...v arr—M- e. C. .lam mm:li°o.mr•r AMA,o W, j •4 I �.�w r s ft.sr:al.v v Per_a- m'°rte'° VICINITY MAP " re or M.P'T ea MOO IS MOM oca MOO Mena 0101100.01.0101111 . r n...r• am to alePous“ m L .R Ya wu s MT marten d .r drro r w.qn.r.art 1010WOOL w Of alcove. n.comm.. co ma Moe.v est Ifs.10271•2•4 ORM( .011.11.1 R.a.i 1...•.Prcr.. *4v : IL VP.WOO WO WU OVOT IT IVO IMO K ONO ro.,l.o.... • • ,• iarr.,w.r,Mien a.r.:oe P P a.w.0 n.nor uo.n a....WOK TO,w.•.. o., 295026 .•. r+ MO•°" AS SUBMITTED FOR SOH 4/20/95_ a ,P,w.a•°• SDR 95-000 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY (Potp of 1) EXHIBIT R 2S113AC-00100 2S113AC-00101 , WASHINGTON COUNTY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES • FACILITIES MGMT-AMIN 15115 SW SEQUOI #200-WMI 150 N FIRST AVE, RM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97224 • HILLSBORO OR 97124 2S113AC-00102 2S113AC-00200 . ,. PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES SITTEL, RALPH A AND BETTY J 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WMI c/o NORRIS, PETER PORTLAND OR 97224 MYERS, GARY 16520 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 2S113AC-00300 2S113AC-00400 SITTEL, RALPH A AND BETTY J - 1,4:„ DALE FAMILY TRUST c/o NORRIS, PETER __ BY WALLACE DALE MYERS, GARY --- 16650 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD 16520 R BOONES FRY RD TIGARD OR 97224 L PO Af AND p OR 97223 2S113AC-00500 2S113AC-00600 PARKER, RUTH A SCHISLER FAMILY TRUST 16730 SW UPR BOONES FY RD X 16760 SW UPPER BOONES FY RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 25113AC-01000 2S113AC-01100 , SCHECKLA, DARYL D SCHECKLA, DARYL - 10520 NW JACKSON QUARRY RD . 10520 NW_ JACKSON QUARRY RD HILLSBORO OR 97124 'LtORO OR 97124 2S113AC-01200 2S113AD-01700 WASHINGTON COUNTY INVESTMENT CO FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 3939 SW ST HELENS ROAD 150 N FIRST-0i, RM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97210 HILLSBORO OR 97124 2S113AD-01800 .... . PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES--------A 15115 SW SEQUOIA-PKWY #200-WMI PORTLAP15---- OR 97224 S D R15-000 g COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8 218 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising *City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. *Tigard ,Oregon 97223 RECEIVED • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit • ,JUN 0 61995 a SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY CITY OF TIGARD The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five(5)multi- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of S.W. Durham Road STATE OF OREGON, ) and S.W. 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC,tax lot 100.)ZONE: I-P(In- COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS. dustrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency ad- ministrative Kathy Snyder ministrative services, public support facilities, professional and ad- ministrative services, financial,insurance,and real estate services,busi- being first duly sworn, depose and say,that I am the Advertisin ness support services,manufacturing of finished products,packaging and Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-Tualatin 'limes processing,wholesale,storage,and distribution,among other uses. AP- a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 PLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sec- and 193.020; published at Tigard in the lions 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,and aforesaid county and state; that the 18.164. Site Develop.-McKenzie/Pacific Realty T . a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the 'r t I entire issue of said newspaper for_ ONE successive and —L---1, I consecutive in the following issues: June 1 , 1995 g Illab k. ,,.,.‘........../' '':172,11:4,'°,5'w';'4';'''''' Subscribed and sworn to . : Ire me this 1 s day of June, 19° 11 III 1 C &L7 t��=rte Notary Publ' for Oregon MVO.. ■ h My Commission Expires: ••A ■ / 4 AFFIDAVIT fill. _is ' *IA (1) CASE: VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP SITE OFTECIPIOTE Mvid(m.1 T_ raulIZIWPACITM MULTI FEET - Cr 4 0 ✓t 0o The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 F.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on June 12, 1995. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an ap- peal is 3:30 P.M.,June 14, 1995. TT8218-Publish June 1, 1995. -94 ()t S � a � . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. -_> . o °j-Doce- OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. }y APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: CA,/) DATE: Q3c,. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S4,u711-0p-- Suj Dw140\-^ . (A) Application form (1) �. u) 7 Z J ____(B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2_ S ' (3 AFC. - Inc) authorization J ____(C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE It 11/7- 41-- (D) Assessor's map (1) -- PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* PA ,cic. 4ti (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist? ADDRESS /4-3/( 5 SW St3-0vo/,4 Fk/caxr PHONE 6224 X300 (F) Applicant's statement 50174. CITY (I3,2..77 vr7 071_.41vr.) ZIP ' (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* e- 1rz-) (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS ee.c, C Su) i3etro4WJ-r PHONE 2L4 1[S 70 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY rbw j not t e-,,,1 ZIP 172.„6 / (H) Filing fee (t &aI"` ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow 77,h5 c,uw rc_¢z cA.J 'Jew Approval Date: .u - c£wc.,ozfrs- 6 c../DS Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 -- 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: Nomrer 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this ■2 ''r ' day of 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. /f4 (KSL:pm/0524P) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF TIGARD OREGON FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0008 FILE TITLE: MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY APPLICANT: Mckenzie/Saito & Association OWNER: Pacific Realty 0690 SW Bancroft 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway Portland, OR 97201 Suite 200 (503) 224-9570 Portland, OR 97224 (503) 624-6300 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of five(5) multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling approximately 180,000 square feet. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 13AC, tax lot 100). ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services,public support facilities,professional and administrative services,financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products,packaging and processing,wholesale,storage,and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (503) 639-4171 x315 SDR 950008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY May 2.1995 03/10 15:48 1995 FROM: 503 624 7755 TO: 150322812A5 PAGE: 2 03/10/95 15:30 $5( 24 7755 PACTRUST/M&T/PD. -* MacKENZIE ENG. Cij002/007 CERTIFICATE OF SALE OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY Parcel No. 200 This is to CERTIFY, that I, Larry Eisenberg, Facilities Manager of Washington County, State of Oregon, pursuant to delegation from the Washington County Sheriff, pursuant to the provisions of ORS 275.110, ex. seq. and in accordance with an order of the Board of County Commissioners of said County, dated the22 day of NMI , 1944 placed at public sale the following described real property, situated in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, to wit: known as map and tax lot number 2S113AC-00100 on Assessment and Taxation Records of Washington County; That Pc.L_;Cr;t I f 45_0(JA L.P (BUYER) at said sale offered to pay the sum of$ !, =I O,COO( C' (BID PRICE) for said property, which sum was the highest and best bid received that exceeded the minimum price set therefore, and paid (by CASH, CHECK, OR MONEY ORDER) at the time of said offer the sum of$I oeo (X) , the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. This deposit shall be forfeited if, for any reason, buyer does not complete the sale. The balance shall be payable by either one of the following: /1. Cash, certified check or cashiers check on or before ■.s 'IAA/ 2. Contract not to exceed sixty (60) months at an interest rate of 10 percent per annum with monthly payments including principal and interest thereon until the whole sum of the purchase price is fully paid. It is understood and agreed that this sale is subject to the terms and conditions of the sale as published, and is subject to the confirmation of the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County. This sale shall be binding by Washington County only in the event of approval by said Board of County Commissioners. It is understood and agreed that if a notice of claim of a municipal corporation lien assessed against said property has been filed, this sale shall be subject to the right of the municipal corporation to repurchase said property within a period of twenty days after notice to the municipal corporation of this offer to purchase pursuant to ORS 275.170. DATED at Hillsboro, Oregon, this qqay of Jafl L 1 y A / _ Larry Eisenberg Buyer's Signature Facilities Manager PA (4, G tlif4gtt Y ,l SSD,,t 7f445 L p Washington County, Oregon Name to Appear on Deed By _ 1fr-Allk— -- /st/.s .5.t(/ ,r , sc 'u -c 20(3 Address / P)-LA i(b16I) 971246 501 - )..4e- 6300 Phone Number certsale\UCF 03/10 15:49 1995 FROM: 503 624 7755 TO: 15032281285 PAGE: 3 03/10/95 15:31 v^5C 24 7755 PACTRUST/M&T/PD, i MaCKENZLE ENG. L1003/007 • SITE 2S1 13AC 00100 WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PERMIT OF ENTRY WHEREAS, Washington County is the owner of that certain real property described on the attached exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, Washington County deems this Permit of Entry necessary to allow continued importing of fill dirt to attain final grade. WHEREAS, in consideration of the benefits to be derived from said importing, Washington County hereby grants permission to PACTRUST, its employees, agents, and employees of independent contractors performing work under contract for PACTRUST, the right to enter the above described property for the purposes of doing work necessary to import, place, shape and compact fill dirt to attain final grade and to construct a surcharge. As a condition of this permit of entry, PACTRUST shall obtain insurance naming Washington County as an additional insured. This permit of entry shall become effective when signed by responsible parties from Washington County and from PACTRUST and shall terminate when the property sale is completed; and To have and to hold, the right to enter the above described property for the purposes hereinabove set forth unto Washington County until the time mentioned above. Dated this gam" day of February 1995. a R1 uc,;cic_ i�e kk- i 0�ic.�,'Qa 1-•p • v.P Address Mike Malone , Op-rations Manager for Washing on C. my 03/10 15:50 1995 FROM: 503 624 7755 TO: 15032281285 PAGE: 4 03/10/95 15:32 t 5C 24 7755 PACTRUST/M&T/PD, 4 MacKENZIE ENG. fj004/007 • • EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF TAX LOT 100 AFTER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Commencing at the East one-quarter corner of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian; thence S 89°45'59" W along the center of section line of said Section 13, 1328.01 feet to a point on the centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence N 00°16'01" E along said centerline, 277.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence S 89°47'21" W, 70.03 feet to a point on the right-of-way of said S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence continuing S 89°47'21" W, 821 .19 feet; thence North, 316.40 feet; thence S 89°50'20" W, 192.49 feet; thence N 00'20' 10" W, 325.76 feet; thence N 89°44'50" E, 522.02 feet to a point which is 33.00 feet from, when measured at right angles to, the centerline of S.W. Durham Road; thence continuing N 89'44'50" E, 37.45 feet to the centerline of said S.W. Durham Road; thence southeasterly along said centerline on the arc of a 200.00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 31'52'50" (the long chord of which bears S 46'51'25" E, 109.85 feet) an arc distance of 111 .28 feet; thence S 62'47'50" E, 235.16 feet; thence southeasterly' on the arc of a 600.00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 16'14'02" (the long chord of which bears S 70'54'51" E, 169.43 feet) an arc distance of 170.00 feet; thence S 79°01'52" E, 79.99 feet to the intersection of said centerline with the centerline of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence S 00'16'0I" W along the centerline of said S.W. 72nd Avenue, 387.56 feet to the true point of beginning. The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 514,261 square feet (11 .806 acres) , more or less, outside the existing rights-of-way. Basis of Bearing: County Survey No. 24,504, Washington County survey records, Washington County, Oregon. -\ LO f L 1 N H v J L1 I N/1 t-IV I I N SECT!OKI IS) T. 2S. ) P . iw. ) V\I. M . Q !.1 r NAV .. . .]AM o I - �� - ' xt .rAr , roc r �• I m.. .. ;iv,. I I �' i[7 is r 1311• J :A 21 et .ot ro 11 ,,,,.• i 1 z - ... - H _ I foG' 1 I I h. wW _ a 22 . I Y 4 I 23 26 I 27 - 2 I 29 30 I 31 32 Wig' N .... c I r) I.J N C I I I H IV I :•,.) w 1 I .. r^ z 5 W / • uo , 1 23 it I I I ( . I y�y N$T•Arml • Pw Y T 1 • - _ 1 _ _ 1 _ _ 1 _ _ 1 _ _ 1 _ _ 1 _ _ .1 in .ter. N ---- — - T -- - 1- — — T -- N a ! i-i .N.o 42 '00 I I ••\ . I I I 5 go In sou .w. I ,A o... A ` it 5 I �VANaM I I € J ..Ox 43 41 I 40 I 39 38 I 37 I 3' -. 35 34 33. 5 + TO _,. I I I I I I \\\\ 1 , 2-°- a 1 I I I 2374 12 .. Rao ~� aAAC 44 ` n r Pi o, 2 'C) AN../ t .\ ~ MAP' �.. ,.... •• -_.--- •--r ' •- .- . - . �� SCALE : L"= 200' r r 13110 r.< I 1100 1000 "� TAY. Ldr I O O N I . I 16.081 Ac.. I p�J=Fc,NE I I 3a' 0 � I A C IAFTEF 1 1 o ti I 2 3 l: 4 E 5 6 7 9 9 10 J , �' C 0 U N I C J IL I V 1 IE W I r Ii 23-87 I 1 I I / 4 o cr al a - ... - I - - 1 - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - •ra .... r •N•r •r.•r.r��N�N�r••••Ma}11N11N�rN11. 1..�T LIAlE II 1 II II AFTER, o j 1300 .200 ACJUSTMBNT f rir At U- 0.4 I "' I I �� C ;t E IS lNo. 11 I 1 TAX LioT L2Qo: i ,� 'I 20 - - t8 IT 16 15 14 13 12 I I �. �EF=o LAW EE 03 CO ? . i 2.2,c,, iAo . BEFORE I I I I I V ADJUSTMENT 7. 13 Ac. APTEP, I _`,..��;, 1 I 1 t cod r -"'.r_ 22w- _.I_ .-*w1;_...,.1.,._..WaL_� j- +L •� .. c N. .�_ ... So'� - �C Beni t'l DAR I ES of Lc) TAX L.oTs too fr O SC2 YAP I2p0 (Lots + 2%1*DB \ AFFECTEc 8Y o APJuSTME.NT) 03/10 15:52 1995 FROM: 503 624 7755 TO: 15032281285 PAGE: 6 03/10/95 15:34 $`5' '24 7755 PACTRUST/M&T/PD ∎-, MacRENZIE ENG. 4006/007 • • n,. rmm�......... : s... 4,la?',:`... : :',.7 a.. .mow' .;:yra,\� ,A,x:n f'o�: :.x .:,,4.,:>-.:.`'?:'t FAeoltD ';..., .9"P ,'sif': �': F.%5'� "r,�' kx X, � a�.�G tv.!" 'nut OAT!(MM/�/Y'�) ;'EL -vXS--'bio:�^Oicia.^.L;:9i.'S.t4:R})4:i' cka •'{• ... ii 7s. '6", . PRODUCER a CA 14-I is • A MATTER OF INF•- • •N •NLY AND Marsh & McLennan, Incorporated CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE 2700 O.S. Bank Tower DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES BELOW. 111 B.W. 5th Avenue Portland, OR 97204 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Kathleen S. Danley COMPANY Lomm A AMERICAN MFRS MUTUAL INS CO LtA B INSURED Pacific Realty Assoc. et.al. COAVANY 15115 SW Sequoia Pkwy C Suite 200 COMPANY Portland, OR 97224 D OMPANY E LETTER r►�/ - - h n - .: kK,:*i:Lft�kVSt�t4'F gg: M h n ;T1.I�� n � ��; _ .n:LS:.,,•k :::`. "�•� ,.<:v :,:£:Aa M.Y.....-... ..nr.m.,.. .,......,.r....... � a...n S .n..,xl-- ,,...j::.� ...,N.:Cfnf¢?\..�%!.. ..,axti..,.h.:i ht,n���a�ivoa�r`F..k'RfiFi t1,�,::R't w'A)cn awn ...ttuw:;:<v :. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE USTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POUCY PERIOD INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO AU.THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POUCIES. UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO iOUCY ISPRATION LARS LTTR TYPE OF R18URANCE POLICY NUMBER D�111 IA/OOM) SATE(MM/DO/TY) ■ A GENERA&L,ASamr 3MH768961-00 11/30/94 11/30/95 MNERALWORECATE $ 2000000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABLITY PRODUCTS-COW/CP A . $ 1000000 !CLAIMS MADE 13 OCCUR. PERSONAL a ADV.INJURY $ 1000000 OWNER'S a CONTRACTOR'S PROT. EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000 FIRE DAMAGE(Any ono Sri) $ 500000 Win IDPENSE(Any one porsoN S 10000 AUTOM08tf UAEIJTY COMBINED SpaE ANY AUTO LIMrr s ALL OWNED AUTOS BODLY PALMY sC IEDUIED AUTOS (Per p•�I i HIRED AUTOS BODLY MUTT NON-OWNED AUTOS (No aeeldany $ GARAGE UABUTY PROPERTY DAMAGE s EXCESS LIABiITY EACH OCCURRENCE S l UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE S OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM .:??::?:,a? i;.?,'MWeR:'N.4,4,/?.:! ?' ,:0.:�S: ..;:: WOR ER S cOMPENSATfON I STATUTORY Laws 1,,:a•i,*-A:s'r::fi>,::'.i, EACH ACCIDENT $ AND DISEASE-POLICY WIT S EMPLOYERS UABIJTY DISEASE-EACH EMPUNEE $ 1. OTHER ' DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/V!?ICSES/SPECLIL ITEMS Certificate Holder is additional insured as respeacts clearing, excavating & filling operations by the named insured at SW 72nd Ave. & SW Durham Rd. , Tigard, OR consisting of 11.8 acres. e>=RT[Frr,AEAoP .....0 .. ..:',i,. . ...: ...:.:. .:::...��.CANggltA 4.. : ... : . .. nnn... x SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE Washington County - Dept. of Ep, EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF.THE ISSUING COMPANY NALL ENDEAVOR To Land Use Sr Transportation 'y' MAIL 3O DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE Attn: Mike Maloney .< LEFT.BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBUGATION OR 150 N. 1st Ave. . UABIUTYOF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPAMt;ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. Hillsboro, OR 97214 } AUTIWR[2f0 $= . .... ` - >v A.R. (( •� ,„ :. .:... %) AGOfiD2S. � Q" ° r o fFnYaQ a.nA�u iS� � : c �. f i � `;�,.str n<. M4,;,4 i:H ;?.'�� S MVirdoRt.coHliv Plo aanw.oi iii 1 03/10 15:53 1995 FROM: 503 624 7755 TO: 15032281285 PAGE: 7 a 03/10/95 15:35 $5' 24 7755 PACTRUST/M&T/PD ) MacKENZIE ENG. Lt007/007 • :s .vmh . •.1 mo •:-.6:: 't'i' 1 ' imv •""C Ow�,: `...b yP!. ��DATE�vw 9/YYACeR1 ; : ; a w � , -7, Ab ,. . ...... S ... . v.�` 2 , rR'rP . i \ � Z 5 vwo0OS:1i TI Ad• TE IS 2a 1 • - • F I •-i!7 •' • •AN e Marsh & McLennan, Incorporated CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE 2700 U.S. Bank Tower DOES NOT(WEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 111 S.W. 5th Avenue Portland, OR 97204 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Kathleen S. Danley COMPAAN LEmm A AMERICAN MFRS MUTUAL INS CO IU'RED LErr a B N Pacific Realty Assoc. et.al. - 15115 SW Sequoia Pkwy C Suite 200 Portland, OR 97224 , D compANY E LETTER ;PQU PEJ•A"arxxt• :x..,. _•,?,. ...:.3.,.•': caf:n7 , .:fi:+Y': :bii: ':x;44.::h..y,.po � v.'.�:`i4:vNJ�:"\v.....-...'�'.:�JJwi�.:w4J.v...v.t.,,..:`,�.i'K�.� � �ti4\t-... ,nn..r:v.n�.r M,.i ' M,xy .::.�'iHbb .... �`'''<aYc2`GN#`�£ ` `R.`yan`'°n ��a �,.:...��3Ja'3 ? THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE USTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT.TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN.THE INSURANCE AFFORDED 8Y THE POUCHES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. UMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY MECO* POLICY CORRATION LTA POLICY NUMBER ��.Nu/corm ��1 /� Ulan A GENERAL IJABIUTY 3MH768961-00 11/30/94 11/30/95 OENERALAG0REGATE $ 2000000 COMMERCIAL CIE PRODUCTS COAP/CP AGO. $ 1000000 'CLAIMS MADE El OCCUR. PERSONAL 4 ADV.INJURY $ 1000000 OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT. EACH OCCURRENCE S 1000000 FIRE DAMAGE Wry ono Ir•) $ 500000 MED.EXPENSE(Ant ems) $ 10000 TOYOB.E UAH&ITY r AB COMBINED SINGLE ANY AUTO UNIT S ALL OWNED AUTOS BOY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS �•r person) HIRED AUTOS BOOZY INJURY NON-OWNED AUTOS (Par aeeklonh $ -GARAGE UABUTY PROPERTY DAMAGE S ■ EXCESS UABIUTY EACH OCCURRENCE S LUMBRSLLA FORM AGGREGATE i ,.` OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM ar .�',`�• . G;, .. . Wv I STATUTORY LIMITS :^" WORMER'S COMPENSATION ........ ......... EACH AOQDENT S ANO EMPLOYERS'UAB&ITY DISEASE-PQ.IC.Y Lq.S t T --r � DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE 5 OTHER ,DESORPTION OP OPERATIONS/LOCATIONs/�IEY.cus/'SPECLIL ITEMS Washington County - Dept. of Land Use & Transportation is additional insured as respects clearing, excavating & filling operations by the named insured a�ty SW 72nd Ave & SW Durham Rd, Tigard, OR consisting of 11.8 acres. ,c1.t7x:B A1.r.�:.... W .. , .. ` , ,. ,o aXtii;: 060PAg �} 4 lgt Tor•ew an�'F''.��-',e2,1,zygErs�o. av n �VI < -. ....,.. ... ,<..... .:-;:i•:d, �'k'�.5��!'!� �!,,,..: .•....'..lNn'+eo.:�a4::•ini•:kkixJibebEd:'a`�:):.]::,:»r3<A".;.z',�..,,„`t�a�.����'K'v"w.,.YoGcd•: a„,...a; SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POUCIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE County Counsel D PIRATION DATE THEREOF.THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO Attn: Dan Olsen MAIL._....3..0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE 150 N. 1st Ave. ::."4 LEFT.BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR Hillsboro, OR 97214 UABIUTY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. ie All •-• z• . TAT1VE / �;`'rn... .: - - -: v.v:;: ::;c::;x,:�. "�:nw'e«•r-•a-.. o v „r• ,w . �p r' a.o°(3.' ”`3.rY� .,Q s•:dc. c'b.^•+.w,as•¢• :b?'�. �� '�F�� >:'.'v::r��;r:^". fa`.`�.^-,^.•cvn,...v::::r::.;:,:.,-:,�y.;:;:.v..�...., �:�Vnl� T+ :9I/':,................�:'•'::a....-,.,....:;:i:+'�'oY' S':.k .�f`v' nbt o..d:Yti.,:��! �•• �R �'f�:+�:24��'�: '����`fK'''F:i:o.;.; �;::,,::�:>. . �. hrA'��.� .:::..�.......:.n�....................�..�:. ...,:,s1�QR0;t�A�i!(�N,R4if'�N<:3891s MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED LMEE SF 17121-JRZENIIT1TQL CIVIL• STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 (503)224-9560 (503)224-9570 FAX(503)228-1285 Date: April 21 , 1995 Project Number 295186 To: City of Tigard Attention: Will D'Andrea Project Name: Pacific Business Center VI Please find attached: shop drawings X plans samples -specifications -copy of letter change order details calculations Number of copies: Description: (18) Sets sheets SD1-SD5,L1 (18) Sets sheets A1 ,A2 (for each of 5 buildings) (18) 81" x 11" copies of site plan X For your use X For your review -For approval As requested REMARKS: Copy to: Signed: Steve Doherty/as Mailed X Delivered -To be picked up If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. /Va9 rra4t>€_ MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET • PO.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9570 • FAX(503)228-1285 April 20, 1995 City of Tigard Attention:Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8199 RE: PacTrust Business Center Buildings 186, 187, 188, 189,and 190 Project Number 295026 Dear Will: Enclosed are drawings as required for Site Design Review for PacTrust Business Center Buildings 186, 187, 188, 189,and 190. These are multi-tenant buildings intended to serve a variety of businesses,as allowed by the IP zone. All Development Code standards are met by this application;no variances are requested. Approval standards cited in Section 18.120/180(A)of the Tigard Code are addressed as follows: 1. "Code Sections" a. 18.84 Sensitive Lands Not applicable. There are no floodplain,drainage areas,wetlands,steep slopes,or unstable soils on the site. b. 18.94 Manufactured Homes Not applicable. c. 18.92 Density Not applicable. d. 18.144 Accessory Uses Not applicable. e. 18.96 Additional Yard Requirements The proposed buildings meet the required street frontage setbacks. f. 18.98 Building Height Limitation The proposed buildings are 25 to 29 feet in height. The Code is met since all buildings are within the Code's maximum height of 45 feet. F:1W PDATA195-04195026120L 1.SK Will D'Andrea Project Number 295026 April 20, 1995 Page 2 g. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening The accompanying drawing indicates landscaping as required by Ch. 100,including street trees and trees within the parking area. Street trees also are used to define vehicular access and pedestrian areas,while evergreen and native materials are used to screen parking areas. The landscape percentage is 20%,which is reduced below 25%based on conformance with Section 18.68.050(6). h. 18.102 Visual Clearance Visual clearance areas are provided by the accompanying plan. i. 18.106 Off-Street Parking The accompanying plan provides 365 spaces based on an overall estimated number of employees for the buildings on the assumption that some tenant requirements will be based on employee count and some on floor area. Tenant permits will be monitored on a case-by-case basis to ensure Code compliance. The parking area design meets the dimensional standards of the Code with respect to stall size,aisle width,and compact stall percentage. The plan also provides,where topography allows,pedestrian corridors to link the main entry of the buildings with the street sidewalk. Bicycle parking will be provided within each of the tenant warehouse spaces. j. 18.108 Access The access plan indicated by the accompanying drawing provides vehicular access onto SW Durham Road. The internal system has been designed to provide clear spaces for through movements,to reduce off-site conflicts. The plan meets the dimensional requirements of Section 18.108.080. In accordance with the City's request,an updated traffic report concerning the intersection at SW Durham and SW 72nd is submitted in support of this application. k. 18.114 Signs Signs will be wall-mounted and are within the Code standard for size. 1. 18.150 Tree Removal There are no significant trees on the site. m. 18.164 Street and Utility Standards The site's street frontage will be improved to include a 6'-0" sidewalk along SW Durham and SW 72nd, in accordance with the City's direction. F:\WPDATA\95-04\95026\20L1.SK Will D'Andrea Project Number 295026 April 20, 1995 Page 3 We also reviewed options for the extension of Findley Road through the site and determined,due to the topography of this and adjacent sites,that this extension would be detrimental to this and future projects to the south. Also,in accordance with City staff request,we reviewed sanitary sewer facilities in the surrounding area and found existing sewer could serve the property to the south of this project in the following ways: 1) Existing sewer in Bridgeport Road(City of Tualatin) 2) Existing sewer in Upper Boones Ferry(City of Durham) 3) Existing sewer in SW 72nd(City of Tigard) The sewers in Durham and Tigard would need to be extended to reach this site,but are at a depth that would allow service. Therefore,a public sewer extension across the proposed project is not required. The owner has elected to construct the on-site private system to public standards in the event this option is lost due to cost constraints. 2. "Relationship to Natural Environment" As described above,soil and topographic conditions are not a difficulty on this site,and there are no significant trees. 3. "Exterior Elevations" This section does not apply since no residential areas abut the site. 4. "Relationship Between Uses" The vicinity of the site is commercial and industrial in nature. The proposed buildings are similar in character,and the site development provides a quality of landscaping commensurate with existing development in the area. 5. "Privacy" Not applicable. 6. "Private Outdoor Area" Not applicable. 7. "Shared Recreation Use" Not applicable. F:1WPDATA 95-04\95026\20L1.SK Will D'Andrea Project Number 295026 April 20, 1995 Page 4 8. "Floodplain" There is no floodplain on the site. 9. "Public/Private Space" The distinction between public and private space is provided by signage and landscaping. 10. "Crime Prevention" Although this section applies primarily to residential development,this project will provide adequate lighting and accessibility as envisioned by the criteria. 11. "Access" See Section 18.108 discussion above. 12. "Public Transit" Not applicable. 13. "Parking" See Section 18.106 discussion above. 14. "Landscaping" See Section 18.100 discussion above. 15. "Drainage" Storm drainage is indicated by accompanying drawings. 16. "Handicapped Access" Due to site topography,direct access from public sidewalks is provided in 3 of the 5 buildings and handicapped parking is provided to each of the proposed tenant entries. 17. "Signs" Signs will be submitted under a separate permit. F:\W PDATA\95-04\95026\20 L 1.SK Will D'Andrea Project Number 295026 April 20, 1995 Page 5 18. "Underlying Zone" All provisions of the IP zone are met by this proposal. No variances are proposed. Thank you for your review of this material. Sincerely, art K J Dennis R.Woods DRW/sk c: Ken Grimes-PacTrust Enclosures F:\WPDATA\95-04\95026\20LLSK 02/22 14:17 1995 FROM: 503 684 7297 TO: 150322812,15 PAGE: 4 02/22/95 14:00 V5I 84 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 4004/005 Name of applicant Mackenzie/Saito & Associates , PC Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # Map #251 Lot 13 A C 100 Address or General Location West of SW 72nd South of SW Durham Road AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, Donna Macdonald , do affirm that I am (repruseri the party initiating Interest In a proposed site development effecting the the located at the above noted location and did on the 23r d day of Fe b r u a r.y __ 19 95 personally post notice incticating that the she may be proposed for a s i t e d e v e 1 o pme n t review application, and the tdtie. date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposaL The sign was posted at the corner of SW 72nd & SW Durham (state location on property) This 23rd day of February is 95 iij44(-6 ) G/Clrri-cL -- Signature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this = ' day '-.: 199 's., OFFICIAL SEAL ,ils -� !� //_V��i • -�,- - Notary Public •r the State of reg MARILYN B MC ALISTER+ Commission Tres: - ?�� /���� `�� � NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My ,i.I COMMISSION NO.034969 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 09, 1999 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OP 97223 laoinVO∎poe notat 02/22 14:16 1995 FROM: 503 684 7297 TO: 150322812A5 PAGE: 2 02/22/95 13:59 $51 84 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 16 002/005 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TICARD ) I, Dennis R. Woods , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 23rd day of February , 19 95 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persona on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at Pa cTru s t Business Center Expansion ,a copy of which nonce so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to saki persons and were deposited on the date Indicated above in the Untied States Post Office at Johns Landing Branch , with postage prepaid thereon. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this -eefP. day ofc" .�O.y/ ,, 19�� f I',' OFFICIAL SEAL / ' /�s' - MARILYN B MC ALISTER N- djj ���P ` � "� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Commission Expires: , .>� COMMISSION N0.034969 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 0S, 1998 hA\loginyoWniaII.dt MACKENZIE/S, .. 10 & ASSOCIATES P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET • P O BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039 • (5031 224-9570 • FAX(503)228-1285 February 23, 1995 Re: PacTrust Business Center Phase VI Dear Interested Party: Mackenzie/Saito&Associates is representing the owner of the property located west of SW 72nd and south of SW Durham Road, Tax Map 2S 1 13AC, Tax Lot 100. We are considering proposing an expansion of five(5)buildings to the PacTrust Business Center at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: 9th Day of March 1995 at the Offices of PacTrust 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97224 Meeting Time to begin @ 4:30 pm and conclude when questions have been addressed Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at my office (224-9570) if you have any questions. Sincerely, "N..\1 00_4 Dennis R. Woods Project Manager Architect DRW/ks - F:\WPDATA195-02\950261LTR Mary Swintek Durham Professional Building Corp 9915 SW Frewing #23 17685 SW 65th Avenue, #300 Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Craig Hopkins Normandin Brothers Inc. 7430 SW Varns 2335 SW Mossy Brae Road Tigard, OR 97223 West Linn, OR 97068 Mark F. Mahon Pacific Realty Associates 11310 SW 91st Court Attention: Ken Grimes Tigard, OR 97223 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway, #200 Portland, OR 97224 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Daryl D. Scheckla Tigard, OR 97223 10520 NW Jackson Quarry Road Hillsboro, OR 97124 Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce Dale Family Trust Tigard, OR 97223 16650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97224 Washington County 150 N 1st Avenue#B-7 Ruth A Parker Hillsboro, OR 97124 16730 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97224 Bingham Investment Co 3939 NW St. Helens Road Schisler Family Trust Portland, OR 97210 16760 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97224 Peter Norris 16520 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Peter and Elizabeth Moraru Portland, OR 97224 5169 SW Joshua Street Tualatin, OR 97062 1 MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE •PLANNING• INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET•P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039•(503)224-9570•FAX(503)228-1285 MEETING MINUTES DATE: March 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Proposed Development of 11-1/2 Acre Site 72nd& S.W. Durham(Tax Map 2S1 13AC-100) Neighborhood Meeting Minutes(3/9/95) Project Number 295026 BY: Dennis R.Woods 41j PRESENT: Daryl Scheckla-Property Owner Stuart Bingham-Bingham Investments Ken Grimes-PacTrust Dennis Woods-Mackenzie/Saito&Associates The meeting was scheduled to begin at 4:30 p.m.;however,due to low attendance,the meeting was delayed until 5:00 p.m. and concluded at 5:30 p.m. The following items were discussed: 1. Dennis Woods provided a brief overview of the proposed development, listing City requirements. A preliminary site plan showing buildings,parking,landscape areas,and existing grades was used to aid the discussion. 2. Daryl Scheckla(owns property west of site at southwest corner,located in the Cit of Durham,with frontage on Findley Road)wanted to now if any street extension with utilities were being proposed that may be able to provide sanitary sewer service to his property. It was indicated that none were proposed. 3. Stuart Bingham(owns property east of 72nd)inquired if we were providing any traffic information. MSA indicated that the City of Tigard asked that we review the intersection of 72nd and Durham with the projected counts from the proposed development of Stuart's property. MSA also indicated we would provide current traffic counts at the 72nd/Durham intersection(PM peak)to determine current level of service. Stuart asked if we could compare the current counts with previous counts projected for this intersection. MSA indicated they would discuss this issue with the traffic engineers. Every effort has been made to accurately record this meeting. If any errors or omissions are noted,please provide written response within five days of receipt. DRW/sk c: All Present Will DeAndre-City of Tigard MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES F:\WPDATA\95-03\95026\13MM.SK 1 March 9, 1995 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Re: Developement of 111/2 AC f site at SW Durham& 72nd(Tax Map 251 13AC-100) Meeting held at the offices of Pacific Realty&Associates("PacTrust")located at 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway, Suite 200,Porltand,Oregon. Present at Meeting: NAME PHONE# COMPANY NAMEIADDRESS REPRESENTING � p ka cl ti (°L/7-5256 mss.Q Lek/fP 2.O;'YW t►„d �i/j1 .,-, .2Z4-267670/,,,,J4,e,,.,, .ZeY 3v1sr /1.4, soft/ h/ km.) 40300 6rc,� e� r1/4e-714,us7- TitctAusrt 4 s Wacr0S ,Z1-4t-/57c, A■thcictorzc e- `5,}-t to ic/n4)S-7' F:\WPDATA\95-03\950261SIGNUP.DRW Gex)Tich Ppor± L jr; r w Geo Engineers O 0„, February 7, 1995 Geotechnical, Geoenvironmental and PacTrust � � � � � � -"� Geologic Services c/o Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. 0690 Southwest Bancroft P.O. Box 69039 Ft='3 - 7 t , `; Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Mar':enzio/Fnito & kcori?tes Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Attention: Mr. Dennis Woods Site Preloading PBC-6 Site, Southwest 72nd Avenue and Southwest Durham Road Tigard, Oregon File No. 2361-017-P36 BACKGROUND This letter presents our recommendations for preloading the PBC-6 site. The site consists of approximately 11.8 acres, located southwest of the intersection of Southwest Durham Road and Southwest 72nd Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. The site is a previous gravel pit that recently has been filled to near original grade. The fill material consists of a variety of soils and demolition rubble, some of which was placed into ponded water. The fill has a variable thickness. We have received a copy of the preload diagram, which depicts current site topography and the proposed building footprints. We understand that site improvement will begin immediately. We anticipate that the existing ground surface is settling from consolidation of the uncontrolled fill. APPROACH Obtaining enough subsurface information to accurately predict the response of a site preloading program would be impractical because of the expected variability of the fill. Instead, we recommend that an initial preload and settlement monitoring program be undertaken. Detailed settlement information should be obtained to establish the effectiveness of the surcharge. The initial preload should he a minimum of 6 feet in height above finished floor elevations. Determining the settlement of the initial preload will be critical in establishing the need for additional preload material and/or the timing of preload removal. Therefore, we recommend that GeoEngineers,Inc. 7504 SW Bridgeport Road Portland,OR 97224 Telephone(503)624-9274 Fax(503)620-5940 PacTrust c/o Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. February 7, 1995 Page 2 settlement plates be installed at the center and corners of each of the four preloaded building areas prior to installing the preload. In addition, survey hubs should be installed at the top of the preload at the center, remaining corners, and midpoints of each building footprint, as well as at the corners of the southerly building once it is cut. The dual settlement plate and hub at the center of each building will allow us to separate settlement below the preload from settlement within the preload. Once installation of the preload has started, the plates should be surveyed twice a week. The rate of settlement from these plates may allow for less frequent readings as time progresses. Settlement readings should be accurate to the nearest 0.01 feet and should be provided to us immediately for evaluation. It is difficult to estimate how long site preloading will be necessary. Since the subsurface material is highly variable and undocumented,the settlement rate is indeterminate until significant settlement data is available. Our best estimate is that it will be a month or two after the initial preload is in place before we can determine whether additional preloading and/or time is necessary. It is important to note that a greater thickness of preload material will decrease the time required for preloading the site. • O ► - G e o E n g i n e e r s File No.2361-017-P36 PacTrust c/o Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. February 7, 1995 Page 3 We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions concerning the information provided, please call. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Don Rondema, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer Scott V. Mills, P.E. Principal DLR:SVM:jae Document ID: 23610171.sur cc: Mr. Leon Hartvickson PacTrust Mr. Dick Krippaehne PacTrust Copyright© 1995 GeoEngineers,Inc.,All rights reserved G e o E n g i n e e r s File No.2361-017-P36 3toryvi VrcAv't& e QaIcu1th' u PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER TIGARD, OREGON STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS A. DESIGN PARAMETERS 1. USE RATIONAL METHOD 2. SITE DRAINAGE DESIGNED ON 10 YEAR STORM 3. INFILTRATION SYSTEM DESIGNED ON 25 AND 100 STORMS 4. RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY UNIFORM ROAD IMPROVEMENT DESIGN STANDARDS. 5. TIME OF CONCENTRATION (5 MIN. MINIMUM) 6. MANNING'S n=0.013 B. CONVEYANCE 1. SEE ATTACHED STORM CALCULATION SHEETS AND PIPE KEY MAP FOR RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS G �pFROF 14.1 G 1 N Ey 15,504 cc • l - —.1110 OREGON ✓G<y 25.19 , ? KORO G EXPIRES: 6/30/95 PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER TIGARD STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structurol • Transportation — DESIGNED BY: R. BOETTCHER F DATE: 4-21-95 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 JOB NUMBER: 295026 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 SHEET A OF 17 Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 295026 \DETAIL$\NEISTOR'DWG RVB 0/21/94 II�B 1100 Hydrology: Peak run off flow rates have been calculated using the rational method. Time of concentration and rainfall intensities are based on the "Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards". Required storage volumes are also determined using the rational method and based on a 25-year storm event. Infiltration during storm events is neglected for storage calculations. The peak flow for the three combined sites is 43.95 CFS, and the required storage is 24,788 CF. An elevation vs. storage volume summary has been included in the calculations. An assumed high water elevation of 147.00 was used to calculate basin capacity of 49,000 CF. An additional calculation was made based on a 100-year storm event. The combined site peak flow rate was found to be 58.39 CFS, and the required storage for this event was found to be 32,932 CF of storage. Clearly both storms can be contained within the boundaries of the infiltration basin. Therefore, no storm outlets will be required. A sketch of the infiltration basin has been included within the calculations sheet No. 14 of 17. This sketch depicts proposed adjustments to the existing basin area. For a complete detail of the required improvements, see the site development plans. The existing topography and soils conditions of this "natural" infiltration basin provide ideal containment with minimal modifications to existing conditions. Infiltration Basin: Based on information found in the "Storm Water Narrative" provided by Harper Righellis, Inc. dated November 21, 1991, (see attached copy), it has been assumed that soils types, classifications and infiltration rates have not changed. These are assumed to be soils classification Group B, and an infiltration rate in the range of 0.6 inches/hour to 2.00 inches/hour. Water Quality: Based on "Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook", dated August 1991 , we have determined that the infiltration basin will provide treatment for removal of the required 65% of phosphorous from the combined sites. The combined catchment ratio for all sites is 0.69% assuming an infiltration rate of 0.5 feet/hour. From Figure II-1, the -- infiltration basin is projected to treat 69% of the combined flow. G:\95-04\29502612Intjb I. • Ge#f c& f'/ tGO 14 aril I L to te, .. 1 alio Ca 3+II ca t+I° I - , C' l/ ( 1 V 24 ZS 24 25 ]L ze zo ! 03 C41127 t' P C64$2( 0302M CiW23 ! 1 ! : I. m 3a. 1:7) 6-.) _o ! 1' Cl�ti� ,if NM L i F_Z O I 0 ! 2 t `t CE Mff ' I i hj el 014119 I i I i Ctt' ■ f 1 } © 00n I s II IL 13 IN IC I U [-------- CA u Ce rig. • 012A )NACF SCHE/14 ATIC BY QLF f-PC/F/C DATE q / (o /9c MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO 2c'coz6 CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. f OF /-7 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • ORA/NAGF A,F1)s 1 T t 'i A/2FA A 2),7A � ffi) ( Ac ) C 6 I -/Sov 0.to C8 Z 550G 0.13 3 35-7c o.o� Cr3 y 9`00 0,23 C SLR SCcou 0.13 C13 S 15,oc0 0.34/ CG G '7,c o 0,17 C6 7 lo,Soo o,2°/ C.3 e 3,coo 0,07 C6 5 12 600 0.2y CI? to 11, 900 0.27 Ci 11 7,zoo 0./7 C8 12- c125 D-l9 C/3 13 6s 2S 0,tc 03 1'1 6k2c 0.16 Gr tr soon p.16 U3 1 , c.1�vo 0,23 Cr3 /7 c000 0.1K C/3 1K )7,Coo 0. io 03 15 15,400 0.3S C3 2 0 7,Soo 0.17 C6 2l !l,loo C 2C J3 22. 13,woo BY DATE MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. — OF 17 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • e ITEM Al2IA AREA Cp') ( At) Cr, 23 7,7oU cog cr, 2`/ /0,200 0,23 C/3 2S (37ro o.,r Co 26 CAN) 0.1� Cr3 2'7 13,8(41 0,37_ R,0, ► 5375 0,2z (R,o, 2 G2(o 0.1,/ (2,0. 3 6's7r 0.16 R,rJ. y/ 5E7r 0.13 12.0 C 2410 5,06 (2,n. 6 9371 0,22 (2,o. 7 5621 0.13 >2,0, Q Gsob 0,/f R,0. 9 6svu 0.15(2,0 , 10 / 1, 32( 0,33 (Z.o. 11 5,sou 0./3 12.o. 12 5oo0 0,11 12,/ , 13 N oo 0,/l (2,0 1'-1 5ooa 0.11 P.O. 1f 90ov 0,16 R.O. /6 ?Coo 0,17 (2,o . 17 5000 , 6,8 BY DATE MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. OF 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2 17F_ M A2FA /WE A (-P1) CAc) 12,o, is Sobc) air �,o, 1( 7coo (5,/7 R,o, 20 c-7 O 0,20 /2,0. 2I 6250 0,iy R,O. 2 Z C 7 p,Iv R,0 23 ?CO 6 0,Pi 2,o. 2y 61so D.11-1 12,o . 2s 62s0 r.,o. 2C 56zf: C,/3 -n, 27 GZtc) 0,1g BY DATE MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. 4- OF 17 - 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX(503) 228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED l_ • SCVO? LOC,11-/O,V ONO Hr- (iic/-asl SE1-1 _tr DL.S/GN PROF/LE - `:( l.t 1 ELEV. Dale ��- ct .ri a: NVERT Ck'd 1.i f 1.: r �- ti ELEV. UcII ---- �I III 1.r. 1,1 ii: - 1) 1:+ - !. �) .l a I1: i- >- n n I • �) Cr lil y 1i. w ;j° 111 1- '- c r li fr. _1: I IV �� iii Ill -1 1�. to-1 c.i tS 1 • cr 1 _ 1' , r.) lil e( Q l:) I,1 111 • J 11: -t 11. rrZ�c_ r` 1_ n: j` 111 1.- 1.1 ra: I c.► •` O. z 0_.� • (7 t? (1 �' `_ .:� 0 U 0 7) " - 1 '.( ..( UI l).' a 1 0 1- - 1- - . :__ U _._. I- [C i) C) 0 > J _) __I / 2 3 - /- J_� 6 �y_ a 9 /0 I // /2 /3 /4 /5 /G /7 /a 03 # 1 0) 5.. I 3.0 0.10 . 9 0.09 0.09 0.77 3.0% 6" 1.3C. C.9 47• , /Al 6,2 5.2_ 2.Y' 0.13 6.11 0.21 0.62 1.0. C" 0,73 3.7 5o c., IJ 3 6,2z 5,511 Z.�i�f -O.o .08 o,21 04-s o.(_, k" ). z1 ?.c icy `/ /- (r tl L! /bx O,7� 6•2 2.5I 623 0.21 0.S° I,go 2.0 ( " 2.2 4,3 10 2_ /7 LJ ----•- 6.2 7 GS 2.7L I / ✓/ . ---- --- --- ---- - --_ _r_ -. _ CA ii 511 • (5) 5'°_ 3'6 . ..°0!1 ____A_ O.12 6.12. ..V• l S-��� _G (L 3 e,3 44/ // ' 0.13 5.13 2,94 GS2 0.10 0 59 /,53 1,0 u I•s'7 ,l.< I o Sc ,-- ----- / r.O. 3 (Ft) - -- --- . .6.40-. .5.0 7,92 0,1‘ ? O lN- K 0,73 2.IN -2.0Z s 2.22 6, it 10 ,----------; e--- ------_, _ __ _ �� �'.b, yi Q `_ D- 3'U 6,/9 �� 0.17 U•!7 (>S/ 6.it G_ 1.k6 �/.c 9r / ` - -- 0.17 5,17 _7,97 -- _-s -- -� _-._ -- _-, - -j ,f7� -,C& -- -- --- s.s 6 7 g 2- _-- I . _ a.9O 7.67 S.O� ,r 3.‘"/ /0,U( InG O. 5.72 2,0 I ✓/ .i. . - • .i. r. 5 CI V17? LOC/IRON 21100 Hr._ (,lcros) _ SEI.I.ER DL SIGN PROF/LE ' ) 0 y : GROUND .! ^- ..._. . . ELEV. Dole: — II. IL. • ti: —. 0 <IC (ii vi v) :-:.:: ti :,::: ts ___ . NVE FIT C k d t 1 ".... C.) ''''"" - -.;". ..: ---, IL: ...... .......- . ..f_ C.) --- ‘.3 •- ii. .r •i ..... .,:.._ --.t (3 •-,t. ELEV. I -- — >,. 1.1 Ci: ;::• •.1 t, *-' t) . •• 11 .-:". I.: :ti 1-- w h. •..) •Ir.I ....• --- .Ih ii: :- >- is , l'Y Id W ii. vi ... III I- I- c x "I: •: t, 1,i -I. t_ Iii...i " •.- O. . / _, II. I- z; 6 Id TREE'r -- . ..t. . . -...1 -.• • ii: • .-i: 0 — ;', Ill - r) Z IL I ::,•C • • • • 0 " (..) " !-- !:) t ) '' C.) ::.) .' ..I 7:.c. •( 111 lis 0_ 1 0 ..: I- "':: 1:-•-1-_-.. :::: :_: (3 '17. I- tr: 9, 0 C) --•:- _1 2) -J _ / 2 .3 _ /J /4 /3 /6 /7 /0 /al. 12.O. '‘.._ 0 6-2 0 24) 6,C0 C.›,k 1 3,7 . _____ ______ ____ __. ____ ____ ._____ Costo 5 C. R.0.7 (70 6.02 c.OZ .3.o_ o.cy ..._ 0,52 6,7t P,32 ..2,isi4 in 2- r/ cs,.V clo i _ . . 0,fit 5.2o ----- --. -- ------- — - _ ._......._ ________. ______ = ci) _ 5,72 7.v9 ods- i.k i c.73 /.7% ,2w S.1,3 7,/7 So 0.1/ S.0 3 2.1c7 O./5" I OW /.1c Ss.cc 1,2% /2 ' C.(.3 717 /5" .-- --11 . CO vs 7 - 0 '63 5 S‘ 2.w7 0.2V I 042- 2./7 ‘.11 6.4% IS'. 7.1z. S.? 37 --- -i-- — - — — — R.0• so .C.6.1c a. 6,/0 5.54 atc (Leib ' 6.3(, 2,C3 9,23 0,7% IC" 7.S(i 4,,q loo _ --. ---- ----- ------- -- — - - _ _ _ __ __\ _____ ___. _ .,-------------' & . l0 = (I ‘,27 ZVI g„,'/ 0.9% 9,ts 7 if 3e __ ___ __ _. _ cn 01 9 - 03) 6, /0 C,3z 2,71 0.21 3.29 9,/y air7. it" 9.40 .ea ?o,/ c's C 6. 0:/4,// 0 .043 gfic 2,70 0.q., ' 0.L/6 .4.9 9,9C 6,0?:', /i$' //.7‹ 6,Cs' /64 —__,....-------- ........ --- ---- - - ....., .—.1 C6 /1 /2. • 5 _ 6,37. 7,31 2,43_ 6./q ___. 6./7 3.q, /0,/3- e 5,‘4%. 1i,'' lbw 44r /Olt _„...›.------- .„.....„------- 03 At /3 & 7,S1 e 6.1k, — 4"•11 1401 I0,3V 11,1r GLS 110 __------------. _ cis -g• /,/ a 5-6,2( is 7.v3 2.5.r 6.1(., 5 /s" t/./6 lb.Cb 0.c% A //,7v 6.6s- loc .„....--------- 1 (A ii lc /x" /i'7r (••Cr 36 .-- C.).: . _. • _ r:".7e.)P. t( — -- .- -— ...,.. Oar' .. ,.. 4801 SEJ;"1"`? LOC/1170N Hr. 01c r as) SEI17:7i 012SIGN Pf?0F/LE 13y : - - GROUND <1E iii — . _ Date: – 1 1. • II: .— (I) ELEV. tri LI., C iC d u (., ...... ......„ el Ili •,:... ..--- it: .--.7 ll. • ..---.. ,,..,,.. . NVERT ELEV. -r. _:i ...- :... ..-( (3 41 :..-:." ci -..."- ._ .- . ._., , — . .....______ 1 i .....: >-- 1., (I: -....i el y ...- ---- .55 it, .." >'' is 1 r. ^• I- 11 I" (II w „. w .... to I - I- c -r. (...) 37 1 I., 1- i..3 ili 1-- ft: 11: :1... ) - CO - .-I I e_ II I le I : ' :" i■i ii: : •'1' 0 ,*-- ,( 0 C) I i/ —.. (I. 1_ I t; I I 1 I I. • ::': E{ i— :". • (1. .J "Z. I ) -. 0 ...) ..1 •( le/ IC /1... 1 0 1 • • • 0 .,, 0 1 - . - -.. ..._ _ . .— -- — 5 ., (1 9 /0 // le? /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 _ ..... — —— - CO cl/4.. ,_ • C) . _ .5.0, 3.0 o.23 .9 6.2/ 0.21 6,0_. ..O.S7.. _C _ 1,23 3..11 Po. --- (13 #17 CP _ _. P ! SX2. ..2,9z. 6.4 0,1C 0,3'7 /-0/ 0.0f g " 1-? 3,C`I no ,,,--------- 0,r4 P.D. I( - Cot_ 7,10 OdC 0.1q OS1 VIC 0,C7- 10 z2.1 tito loo _ _____ — _ gm IiI,IS Of) . 0,111 6-4/9 2,7s, az? 0-20 0,11 1,97 a.S,", le 7.1.1 ii,10 loo i _ 12.0. 1- ... rip 0.141 C Pi C) 1 2,70 0-13 0.1z. 0,v1 2.2i/ act;1 16" 2,qc too 576 f ____ A.D. II. go■ 7439 I.6,6 ().i3 6,11 0.qf .7.cr 0,7X /0" 2.if 1/.11f am 73() 2.13 • PP' • 1--- . - - --.- - - - ----_- --- --__ ...---- -. -_-__ -- e.".....".......'''''''' . . - 1 .C6 # ii( _ 6.3_6_ 0.3(2. 10_ _(.),(:%, i ji" 1:73c... _ cti P /9 0 3.0 0,35 0.3z 0,Gie _ ----- ——.... . . -— _ -_. — _—.._. e49.0 4 CG 11 16 a 7,3b 2.63 7 11,7 )2C Ill ---.1 -- ./Y 9,qy ?AG _____ ___ --..1 ,? ____ __ . . — - - -- — -- _______ .... — — — V [ _ (.. , 5:I .1 P M. 15'4,-:ji/f. 1:.: '3' 17110: 10,_ A/'1.1.4 5C1 '1.8 LOC/1770N (i1fin.) /fr. (Acres) SE1-517■1 OLS/GN PROF/LC _ __ ___ ._ _ _ — _ fly : • 0 --- .-.( GROUND •:( 10 --- Date: i.. ....._ i IL. • (1: ..---, ELEV. (.1 NVERT Cksci .. . -1 1 .-- '--. (_) -7 • „--, IC '■.. ,--• "": it: , • 11: "--: -'r *.) --..: ::- .1 6 <1 ELEV. — _. Date. to .....________ II .... ;-- ,,, (I: ..:) (.1 -•.• •-• ." - >- )- II : I- " li: it. 4;- ti ., ("Y id w I,. vi ... tii I - _..I (' • .. 0 I 1.1 ...I 11. (,) 0 )-- w fr Ill Ili til STREET' . -t • - -..) -- •, 1.1 ' 11: • .-f () ..--- 11. -•- ..( (.-_) e.) III -,.: 1-- ''..: 1--•..--• :::: LL: 6 :.!.-. 1--. 'I. (.1 I Li o > _J .1) _J • ____ • • -- _______ _____. ________ __ _ _ I 2 .3 4 5 6 :' 0 9 /0 ii /2 Ii /'/ /5 /6 /7 /8 - , os 0 71 (90 c.0 3.t.) 0.76 -9 0.23 6,1'Y 0-7c) 5;/, &' i 4,1 9.23 c 2• ,.........„..•----"--1 — --._ RD il, C3) Of I( 5.1 2.9k 0.17 i 0,1r Oi.4 1.13 0.5°4 ce 1-73 3,<,/ _ ______ ..____. _____ . Po 17 0 I, ("),70 c.S(.) 2,9s Oil i _ 6,10 o,to ',ell o,ft lo Lim) so __,-------- - i ao Iv (93 i 6,70 C.S(.., 2,92 0•" 1 6,tc., O.k:: t( rr 6.,,f!:; ,(, .— ii,(t) 6 -- Co lc. 6.7) 0,,u 5.7o 7.vi 6,17 0-/C" CO,73 2 ! 0,c% 16 2,21 0.05 . - --- — - 7- -7-- _ 7.3 2:0 i 7-36 6,20 11-elc,.? 12 " ID.R WI 9° • - - 6.10 2 ti 2.6 2. i ,-----------''-/'-----e' _____ - - 1--- • _ i ../------- /5. C.11, 22: 124) - LJ.c) 3,(-) 6,3/ 0,4 -2i 0,td O.g (-6' ___` 1-7 _ 2,3 S(1 , 0 kp. 2° (..)1 3,() 6,70 6,Ife 0.(16 I, w 6,<`/.. /6'' 7./.1 1-/.(0 -- — . — _ 01 _Paz 2( if9 ..._ q-0 O-Pi (.) /1 6.0 j.7c O-Q /6" 2-2Y `I‘" —-- -— , g,17. 21 ' 69 ";'•b OP/ i b.13 ").r/? :'.1( 0,C/, /i.)'' 2.11 11-(f _ _ ______ ___ _r_ -J C15 4 24 6_o Om 6,`/S 2-4 U.CX I/'' .7-0 1f-4 3 . p,o. 73 '1 A 3,6 6 I,/ 6-/3 i,o6 '3./V 6 t"7: 12 “(1 i/t — _— _ — __-_,...__.. ___ ___ ,,--- --'-'" • ' . . ' ___ ' :-��7i)/7/�� ���� /�//�/� �� -__--__-_ _---__-_---_--- ____'-_-_ - . ___- -_---__--_.___-----___' /// ///,'/�' / ' ""'' - � ' �Y�l/��� //��/{�V /o///�/��/� ��/�//!r// /[)(�///ii7/y /](�/ / ' /�� ///C/'�� / ____---__`'__-- --.__--��_ ---_- -_-_-- - -___' --- Dy : ' �� ^- « _ GROUND `x w _- -` , o • ": -- : ^ ^^- . Dn�o' _ �� i� �� "( ^i -� '« "� mr ERT Ck'd \� ^~ �� �� -- /� �7 �� ,i �� « ---.' -�^ EL E\< ' - - -_-' u �': '[ '! �� �� ^� �� .�, •_ .' `. o �� ".....,,.../.'' ~ OU|o:_ ^ /| ,I/ �� '' �- ��/ ". �� y !� `^ � • o� �' >' " ' �� |- .i /�� ''. �� '�, hi o y/ �'� /.) / /� c z r�- II: )� / ' _/ '. !'! �/ hi /[ III [/ �� i� >- rr t'� " � '` ' l � • � ,/ ~^ . ' .t ,� c. u �TRL[[' �� '� '� ' �.> �� ' » � - -� ' �� o J �� u �� • J� oi |- o )- , / u i� /- �` `~ » �� '� �/ IL' u_~� �� � ' � (/ �. ') / ' � - '� `/ �� c' �� -' �� c/ �� ^ ` � + '' |- '' u �- v/ _' � • _ ~ _ _ __ _____ __ _'__ __- __(. __ __ __ __/__ __ / 2 .3 4 �� C :._ (7 .9 u7 v /z /3 /v � /6 /7 --- ��\ { �'» 5�^/ .� ��/� /�� 3•C7 6J�� // ` lu/ �63 . � ^/'�� ��- [�� ----- ----- ----- ----'---'- ----- ---- ---- ----� ----� ----- --'-- �---- -� 03 # 2r 6.±'D --_- _ - __- --- -7:-u - -6)'-/-s-' '6,1,1--/-�/- --1,-7'3- -3-.c-6- 0-,-7-y,' /Z" '1.31'�/ 5'yr --^~- --- '- , '------- _,- `"------::: • _ __ __ ._ _.. _ _ .L __ __ __- 3.151_ . ,_ ~ ~_ _ _-_ ___ _ ___ - _- .__ _ ___ ��� � � e� 7.L1 24,Z 3,6� �C9 0.6`,.. Iv" air c�( 3//_ _ _ - __ _.~ ~~ a.n. 2s _____ _ ��� 5 � 2.0 < / ��/3 ��2 Q'� /«. //'7' 6.tc z'l - '~' -~~- {n w 26 r� �G 7.s6 �� OW u�/3 3'� �'� 6,� /k^ /OS G•{c �X � . v��__ ____ _-__ _-_ -__-.-�-- '--�_ _ _� - '_-- ___' - __-- -_r ~ R.o. 2C -- L.-0 _ _____ _____ /}.m7 �4? 2�2 ��/8 u�/_ �6? /oSuD__ /t' /^7[ ��� 3 9 • 03 02Y ii: 01 ±I-/�_: ' :- _- -_-_� --__ __-_.- - _--_- __-_' �. / -~~~' ^~ ~~ . --' ----' -----' ----- �-4--- ---- ���-' ----- ----- '---- --- /�� +/��` . �M� �O� J_su ��� %�7 -^-^- -^^~~ _ _ _j4 _--_ _- '-_-_ . -~~'- .~ . IIIIli ± '.^. --J - h- - ---- ^- __ _ _ ___ ___ ___ __ __ ___ __ __ __ __ _ ' .~^- • RAINFALL INTENSITIES FOR EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY (for Ranges 1&2 West) 10-year Storm Event 5 3.00 10 2.20 15 1.80 20 1.50 5.1 2.98 10.1 2.19 15.1 1.79 20.2 1.49 5.2 .2.97 10.2 2.18 15.2 1.79 20.4 1.49 5.3 2.95 10.3 2.19 15.3 1.78 20.6 1.413 5.4 2.94 10.4 2.17 15.4 1.78 20.9 1.48 . • 5.5 2.92 10.5 2.16 15.5 1.77 21 1.47 5.6 2.90 10.6 2.15 15.6 1.76 21.2 1.46 5.7 2.89 10.7 2.14 15.7 1.76 21.4 1.46 5.8 2.87 10.8 2.14 15.8 1.75 21.6 1.45 5.9 2.86 10.0 2.73 15.9 1.75 21.8 1.45 6 2.84 11 2.12 16 1.74 22 1.44 6.1 2.82 11.1 2.11 16.1 1.73 22.2 1.43 6.2 2.81 11.2 2.10 16.2 1.73 22.4 1.43 6.3 2.79 11.3 2.10 16.3 1.72 22.6 1.42 6.4 2.78 11.4 2.09 16.4 1.72 22.8 1.42 6.5 2.76 11.5 2.08 16.5 1.71 23 1.41 6.6 2.74 11.6 2.07 16.6 1.70 23.2 1.40 6.7 2.73 11.7 2.06 16.7 1.70 23.4 1.40 6.8 2.71 11.8 2.06 16.8 1.69 23.6 1.39 6.9 2.70 11.9 2.05 16.9 1.69 23.8 1.39 7 2.68 12 2.04 17 1.68 24 1.38 7.1 2.66 12.1 2.03 17.1 1.67 24.2 1.37 7.2 2.65 12.2 2.02 17.2 1.67 24.4 1.37 7.3 2.63 12.3 2.02 17.3 1.66 24.6 1.35 7.4 2.62 12.4 2.01 17.4 1.66 24 8 1.36 7.5 2.60' 12.5 2.00 17.5 1.65 25 1.35 7.6 2.58 12.6 1.99 17.6 1.64 25.2 1.34 7.7 2.57 12.7 1.98 17.7 1.64 25.4 1.34 7.8 2.55 12.8 1.98 17.8 1.63 25.6 1.33 7.9 2.54 12.9 1.97 17.9 1.63 25.8 1.33 8 2.52 13 1.95 18 1.62 26 1.32 8.1 2.50 13.1 1.95 18.i 1.61 26.2 1.31 8.2 2.49 13.2 1.94 18.2 1.61 26.4 1.31 8.3 2.47 13.3 1.94 18.3 1.60 26.6 1.30 8.4 2.46 13.4 1.93 18.4 1.60 26.8 1.30 8.5 2.44 13.5 1.92 18.5 1.59 27 1.29 8.6 2.42 13.6 1.91 18.6 1.58 27.2 1.28 8.7 2.41 13.7 1.90 18.7 1.58 27.4 1.28 8.8 2.39 13.8 1.90 18.8 1.57 27.6 1.27 8.9 2.38 13.9 1.89 16.9 1.57 27.9 1.27 9 2.36 14 1.88 19 1.56 28 1.26 9.1 2.34 14.1 1.87 19.1 1.55 28.2 1.25 9.2 2.33 14.2 1.86 19.2 1.55 28.4 1.25 9.3 2.31 _ 14.3 1.86 19.3 1.54 26.6 1.24 9.4 2.30 14.4 1.85 19.4 1.5.4 28.8 1.24 9.5 2.28 14.5 1.84 19.5 1.53 29 1.23 9.6 2.26 14.6 1.133 19.6 1.52 29.2 1.22 9.7 2.25 14.7 1.82 19.7 1.52 29.4 1.22 9.8 2.23 14.8 1.82 19.8 1.51 29.6 1.21 9.9 2.22 14.9 1.81 19.9 1.51 29.8 1.21 10 2.20 15 1.30 20 1.50 30 1.20 /0/1 7 . '"�.'>�^!?A i�"'°"y.::_.ta:+c c,_.e t,_ .�... ate.•:. ._._. _ _.. .. _ - .. -.. �' CO M /j//'/_t S/Ty (/o L 0 A E- ; EX/ST/A/ , 71-: = 9, 4t- A4/N, . peoPosr.A T = 8 .0-7 �/.� Assu; /vas , VALUE I 9. A,,'// .EX/5 T/"/G, 7W ,4,P�4 9, 5 ,4 L f'/WP05-D 6/7 - .4/Le4- _ //, F3 A-c- QTR L - 2/, 3 AC- 4 C - ,,,.a`, - 7 E .;_ (5'2 `(o,SO) 4 (5, 44`x='• 3`-� 4 ' /' •4-0. �' ' - -- _ c',77 4 Z/,3 a �/ - 2 , (o5 i4. 1, (9'z 5" 2. C / /4 l( , -7 ) X (� ' C. �D) ^ �/ / i l• Jam' - 4t/ ,9 L.2/� 4S 1-� I r� ��.3/ra,57<7E; o (1-3, 9 5- -:1---//3 ( 9, 5t- AO (,/ '-) --E-C--\'' `Di—C-7 T2 V/47r',2 A/7//,4(- J Aj7 BY •(& 6 / 1.,,/G- /f- 'J/c.-' i f/1 /-/`ID �o Lo C-7,1 DATE `1' I Z-- MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. Z/SOZ� CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. I/ OF 1 -7 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED . • 1 / 0 Y2. = C - '.`7-7X3, , D - 3g 73"E �To:244,a e ( mss r 3 / 77-rof4 _g - /3a , v 05- it 717- E-.) - /3 s ; /7' > 6'7 ! _ 4(.70.5- -471 1_6. V - lea o ? � S _ z. 50 r z - / 4s- Sb x_ /D 2/ _ '� / 0c) ;' ff z C L�✓ - �� °o .57 �- //z. - (off � 4 1E41- 1)0 L.14 : (so - ioa s) X 3 =1 / 7 3 3 .(3,I3� " 3 N%S, I3S - 2 (!So Z3.2S-) S = // 87-0 r INS, /40 ° (/So ÷ S/ao) /'3 = 34, /Z S 41-' Z 6 o K 15' = voS nY3 @ V1,$, /47 2 BY /24. ) DATE JOB NO. vc/Sp2(- MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED I CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. Z OF 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED © 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ' p 8 (� 3� ) /od -,---- 7 9, 0-7 ¢�i 3 /so° • BY /2 L6 DATE g Ja--5 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO Z°ISOZ CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. 13 OF 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED © 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED /f Co•I l .,�,ti 1 1 \ e� IZ ( /J 1 ; ; . ' _ : ' EEY- 147- ' r• iil1 : ! I , j ; t r1 , o , � I , Jt + ► ; iii 11" 1��0 / I � ( ` i 1 ( il 111 1 �i - - -- - - - - �,. ' I I , � � � •,"I s OR '+UTFALL :" - ~ ■ ► 1 ! III ' • i . j . . \' ' 0ir:**7 • J J ri i ! 'Si, %e • % ', Ir 1 if I;i(i'l j,(r ir, .; I, ;,, ` ,1 , 6" STORM I: 1 CONNECT TO RO Will ; I IIII , ! 1lil 1i(( b \ ` 1 � 1 � r , 1 Ijl ' 'il !,l II i ' III IJII i}T :r ,) ; I ; � 1 i i� I ; 1 , 1 : 1 ' II I rt I : + I ` . I I, ' 1 ( ( 1 I l I 11 I [ f , +, if ! r t { 1 ' } j I + + ���tl 1;1 II! J ,r 'I 11� )J �'1 / r' 1 1 1 I I • I . • J1 / II' tI( I• Mil /t 1 s ! Illinr,. ,'m .. i j 1 !III 1 i I 1 1 . tt : IJl' r-, 11 f � • i; , I1 �11 ', � r , t i .. . I + 11 'I I: ' ! i !IIII Ills 1l s III �I �t 1 j 1j f I , 1 t �� IIII • I , I , •tI I :IIL1 : 1 I I I •1 1III I , �� ' .,. , 1 it r i , ' Ii1 ; if p lip III ! ` ; t ( \ I + ► ■ JI � JiI , lt' 'i I Ji l� � , , ' i7Ii l { , , 11, ., i ' 11 1 , l� , pf k , , I ► l " II + I , + ( `` z • , ', i I ' I f l I Lt ) . Ii ► I , „„ I { i ,( , i f Q IJIiJiI + Iii I II I ), I , �I1 ! 1 ' . !i , l l ! 1r , • I , 1 , •, / s I , ► 11<Jllllf II � II ;....�. _ _ _ - ... _ _ ► ► I OiliIIf1 ` saw � ) -• 1 II 1 I 11 hi.' .61...' ' • -." j ' • '"/_.:.‘..d.t I 1 �i ... mimes.— , _ . -� ! I , , f { j fi ` 011 i �ii \ \\\\ �1 `1 {;. f '. - . -_•11 l 1 ' - II1 , , I �j � ' - - - : -- - - ` 1 11 1 ' - _._ 1 � \ , / l f \ /� i lt, 11/4s,\\\ \0:,\ % ‘ .\\\\\\ s.\.,:v., i ../ 1 i, .. i, i \I \ A\\. \ , \ / , , , 1 ` \\‘ ..\ I�` \. \;`\�``�,\`�`", .' ;� / �I 207 50 ; �� ` 111 \`; \ , , , ,, � , . \ \Y\\\ • ,' ,, / , ' 1 - • 1¢ 17 • . WA7-LRZ Qu4L/ TY C,4LGuL/Q-7/0A/s: 7-27 TA-L-- -/i E- A-,L 4 s/ 3 ,7 00 - /1,46 4 c 2ui-/ or'r Co �F/Cle./.l 470 /MP0-/ZU/oy5 ,4IZE.A- s °I,49Pr0°15) fi (2, 3 6 0. 4 0) /0070 = 4 7� //, 8 f V, 0, 0,5-- + (O,009 X 0 4- 70) = c i g I PoA/a ,42 J.6.4 = I L ;71 = (,, 3 84 P/z 4 VOLL,,//'r c-_,,c-- S7.L2,,A • (C7, 3 (,.. // x (S/ 3.?cc, 4 ) (11-1/zirt.) _ /5, 411 • -I3 4 � � _ k- 4' H, C4-7---c /-,//v/ _,<,/T A-T/o : . ,,3 g4 -r!±')4."( 3 5-CD 11 z l ����/ /oo �o = /, 240 � /48 .4c- CON?5/0/ED ,1/-;_ 0 C.?.:! -Li Ty C,4LC 1,1 L4177O-/ 7-0774 e_ Si --� Ai ;A -- 2-1 . 314C X 43c�o = °I?--75 _ z ai • 3 Rv = 0, 0s + Co, cc" -7( -77 ) O,--7 5.-.41i roAf A-�F 4 = :,,3 S 4- l'7 BY '`,-/ 4- /-2----9C DATE MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. ZJdZ1 CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. 15 OF r 7 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED cnc 6-.), ?, /P7/ /1 Z ( 9!--718Z 3 - 2-71 834, 8 11-7 - /z 1 r. /,ter- 7. ; 1/9 (4-3 CD 76i- '70 7.0 _ Z1. 3 4C BY g_u.,) DATE 4_ MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO .?--CI -Cr"*""‘" CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION SHT. / �' OF 17 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX (503) 228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1 ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA INFILTRATION FACILITIES The approach used to estimate the required surface area of any infiltration facility (except roof drains) is: 1 . Determine the contributing acreage above the potential infiltration site. 2. Calculate the runoff coefficient (Rv) for the site either from Rv = 0.05 + (0.009 x impervious area %) or Figure B-1 in Appendix B. 3. Based on the infiltration rate of the facility site select,the appropriate chart. 4. Using the required percent of flow capture, read across from the percent of flow captured scale to the line corresponding to the Rv value calculated in step 2. Interpolate if necessary and read off the catchment ratio. 5. Calculate the minimum required infiltration area (in acres) of the facility by multiplying the catchment ratio (as a percent) by the area found in step 1 . infiltration Facility Capture Rate ,,Tg ;.` �, ,\ Infiltration Rate : 0.5 in/hr 100% • 90%. v 809.- n— .1 c r ° 70X- 609:,... ........... ....Rea-Q.5... ...... �. ComemliAC - 50X- CCA /'r70' Rv:4495 • ° 407:- - u 30%- 0 a. x0%- 10%. Rr = 0 OS * 0.09 • Irrpervlow area 0'; 0.01 0.10 1.00 1f 0.00 Catchment raft° (percent) Assures facility has no storage. Figure II-1 : Infiltration facility capture model (0.5 ft/hr infiltration rate). . 4-- /Z-5 raJr-,� GUIDANCE HANDBOOK 11-9 8/91 / /"1 Harper R.-J.-- \r (1., " Righellis, Inc. November 21 , 1991 STORM WATER NARRATIVE PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER BUILDINGS No. 165 AND No. 166 TIGARD, OREGON This site includes the construction of two commercial buildings. The proposed site for initial development is approximately 3.9 acres. The parcel to the east of Durham Road is approximately 5.6 acres. O u') Storm Drainage System: The proposed storm drainage system will be designed to facilitate the 25 year peak flow run-off from both the east and west site. The system will use underground piping systems to convey water to the "natural" infiltration basin located at west end of the site. A storm sewer crossing will be required across S.W. Durham Road. Based upon our preliminary grading concepts for both sites, it has been determined that a 21 " will be required. It is proposed that the storm sewer cross under all existing or proposed utilities in S.W. Durham Road. This basin will provide adequate storage volume and infiltration capacity for the 25 year event while providing the o water quality treatment per the "current" water quality guidelines and our understanding of their interpretation. Hydrology: Peak run-off flow rates have been calculated using the rational method. Time of concentration and rainfall intensities are based upon the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards. Required storage volumes are also determined from the rational method. Infiltration during the storm event is neglected for storage calculations. The peak flow from both sites is 19.60 cubic feet per second, and the required storage volume is 11,050 cubic feet. An Elevation vs. Storage Volume graph was produced based upon the existing topography of the proposed infiltration site. The storage volume only assumes volume capacity "on-site" and does not include excess storage volume provided from the adjacent property to the south, assuming that the property is filled in the future. From the graph, the required storage volume of 11,050 cubic feet will establish a high water elevation of approximately 141 .00 feet. This elevation is well within the limits of the basin, and does not effect any existing or proposed structures. Because there is no natural overflow from the infiltration basin, the 100 year event was also analyzed for storage requirements. The 100 year storage volume requirement is 14,660 cubic feet. This will create a high water level elevation of approximately 143.5 feet. Because the basin can store the 100 year event, no overflow facility is required. N O N STORM WATER NARRATIVE PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER BUILDINGS No. 165 AND No. 166 TIGARD, OREGON Infiltration Basin: The existing topography, vegetation and soil conditions at the west end creates a "natural" infiltration basin. We are proposing minimal work be done within the basin. To determine the capability of the site in infiltrate run-off, we have utilized the soil classification data from the SCS's Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon to qualify what type of soils are present in the area. The particular site of interest is located in a soil classification zone called "Urban Land". This classification consists of "area that have been altered by urban works and structures" which makes identification "not feasible". To better understand the soils in the area, we examined adjacent lands that have been classified. These soils are classified under hydrologic group B, indicating the existing soils have properties that make the use of infiltration facilities attractive. Infiltration rates for group B range from 0.6 to 2.0 inches/hr. Water Quality: Based of the Surface Water Quality Facilities Technician Guidance Handbook for water quality treatment adopted by the City of Tigard, we have determined that the infiltration basin will provide treatment for removal of the required 65 percent of phosphorous from both sites. The catchment ratio for the entire site is 0.85 percent. Assuming the most conservative case, an infiltration rate of 0.5 in/hr, the infiltration basin is projected to treat 85 percent of flow. We have researched well locations in the area and obtained all available well logs within the section. It appears that some wells are located within 500 feet of the proposed infiltration basin, but more study must be completed to determine if the wells are still active. If it is found that wells are within the 500 foot radius, a sand filter system may be installed to provide additional cleansing of the run-off. --- - /' -- I T� 'mac - o 2 %Z VET-o, D a q ARe- S /6 �4.3 PGA:'V..7 JS .7;>E7—E Z = 400 F-r. pv LAnID Ft..acQ 025_Y2 — G k' L X A 7 � D_ O.gs+ 0.7.E - -�a,4 �= �i�✓ Gzs = 2-X36 73 X2 2 x s. 9 8. l4" c�S EE 5 ID s77JkA ;E = O -y„ T = 8. 11 cis x k __ = 39oOcr /m•#v z 0 0 g35 /x1//'6/21 JS 530 pr. Pe., �LQw 7Ea� 7 ,06 / 2b) 630E-rx z =2.ZM.,/ F 775 W W N ,/ in in/ Ca4 cC •ti N r ye -747: 7 / /14,,✓ Gz _ 2. 7 "j/MM (2/5—)c 025-= o_ 00 13z6--Y _ - SO.`Z-�7x 'j G - /5. 5 GcS a /Ea/p /3-3 x x(o = 59oo Cr, 3 0 N I..- ID wvavlsW �902.6/ y Da, x 7-z = Q, (7:g 0:497 1-56 co17 G4.9 = z1J. -otc2 /vnl L VA X79 a'oe77,/ -0o/ it/J-(3Z_ 025-4//7 077/.17-6 " Q% c/ a 2/ _ sz a'A SZ� sp. (v/i,t/ Z-/ — l`""'u/ r -Z_" 7c7 / = ( 1 di /V/14 (Wo-7_ OrItf 0>n 7 = /X 774 1J ooq/ = i31Q"1� ()167->d C V7Yf7 _5'19 4/2a: " 11e1- : S3 L'5. Gry gtei 1 - C rn m C m '0NV11a0d 0 0 01 0 W y tn 0 TABLE VIII - CHARACTERISTIC RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CHART Values of coefficient, C Land Characteristic Average Gradient of Terrain Less than 2% 2% to 7% More than 7% Asphalt or concrete 0.85 0.90 0.95 Roofing 0.85 0.90 0.95 Grassy surface 0.20 0.25 0.30 Bare soil 0.30 0.35 0.40 - 40 - j�/Z TABLE IX RAINFALL INTENSITIES FOR EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY (for Ranges 1 & 2 West) Rainfall Intensity (inches/hr) TIME OF STORM EVENT - YR/(PROBABILITY) CONCENTRATION (MIN) 2 5 10 25 50 100 (50%) (20%) (10%) (4%) (2%) (1%) 0 1.90 2.50 3.00 3.40 4.00 4.50 5 1.90 2.50 3.00 3.40 4.00 4.50 10 1.30 1.70 2.20 2.50 3.00 3. 50 15 1.10 1.40 1.80 2.10 2. 50 2.90 20 0.90 1.20 1.50 1.80 2. 10 2.40 30 0.75 0.95 1.20 1.40 1.65 1.90 40 0.60 0.75 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.60 50 0.55 0.70 0.85 1.00 1. 15 1.35 70 0.45 0.55 0.70 0.82 0.95 1. 10 100 0.40 0.45 0.55 0.67 0.75 0.90 180 or 0.35 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.85 more - 42 - SAL TABLE XI OVERLAND FLOW TRAVEL TIME OF CONCENTRATION (MIN) LENGTH OF AVERAGE GRADIENT OF TERRAIN OVERLAND FLOW (FT) 1% or 2% 4% 7% 10% or less more A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C 50 11 6.5 4 10 5. 5 3 8.5 4 2 7.5 3. 5 2 7 3 2 100 15 8.5 5 13 7.5 4 11.5 6.5 3 10 5.5 2 9 5 2 200 20 11 6 17 9.5 5 15 8.5 4 13 7.5 3 12.5 7 2 300 23 13 7 20 11.5 6 18 10 5 16 9 4 14 8 3 400 26 15 8 22 12.5 6.5 20 11 6 18 10 5 16 9 4 500 28 16 9 24 14 7 22 12.5 6.5 19 11 6 18 10 5 700 33 18 10 28 16 8 25 14 7.5 22 12 6.5 20 11 6 This Table is to be used for Sheet Flow conditions only. SURFACE TYPE: A Grassy B Bare Soil C Rooftop/Paved - 44 - )) , .1 i : . ; 'I; ill ;1 ! . .f,Is.' I i . .* ... ''` r� , 'r ''� r Irv. ,` i 'N� I, . - - - �, ' '�, \ I t ' OLc I I I I II -� ' 40 /fib II ! III4 _ _ / 1 ' 1 ( 1 � , , i11i1 ( , ; j1 , , , IIIII . . _ . _ . . � �� I 1 I , ' III I I I 1 ; 1 1 � 1/%t , 1- ! I , I 2ir I S O,RM,OU,TFALL _ _ _ T. _ . , � c�. I I I I 111)k .f�938.45; • r,i i _ _ - , •,k , � ` i III; I I( Ii((•('(((j ' ' 711 • !'f , ` ` , . 1` ` I 6":STORM / ;iIiiII 1 i1 II / I 1 1 1 I l l i 1 I j (j ( 1 i 1 CONNECT TO ROi 111 i1 , 1 ' II (illIII ) I � ,• IIIiIr ill i1 , '. ' 1 ; ► 11 ' I ' ) 1 11 1 ' l I 1 ; Iii II/ I1 , Ii .II ' II 1111( ;' 11111 I I / 1 , fill ili! ! III i1 i I IIi f 11 i ; ill ( VIII i111 f/ III ! , 1 II II f I ! 11111111i I I I �l ! 11IIL,r11� 1, Ii !1 • 1• .`;r1 1111 ' '1 / ' 1 ' I II I I I , II 1111..,111111 ii i.11 ; 1111.r1 ,'° 1lIrI I If1 . 11 , rid ' , , 1I I ' 1 ' '' ' Lam.. 1 , ( h 11rl1i111 II IIII1 `11111�!i F - IOVI ! ( 1 I 1 `1 w w { ( l 1111 . , 111' iil , I ! I 11QI l • 1 i 1 .•�1.+ 1111 111 i•1IIIt I11I - ( ( \ \`. • r 1111 1 11 ► 4 .11► ►IL ; 'I! il1 I111I I I I r.. 1 11, 111111, 11 11 1 , ( 1�;� 1 r , III 11 , 111111111 , 1111111 '1 i2I 1 , .\ ' 1 ► , 11 111111111 11r l I i � �: i 1 i 1 .1 \ • • Ii111 ► 11111 111 i1 ' 1 1 1 i ' 1 , 1 �, 1 ' E 1 13 . 1 , 111 . 1 ► III �' i ! 111 1 , 1 1 Il fI 1 1 0 ' t , , 3 , I i 1111 , �� , + �. ' ,o 1 111111 ' 11ylii 1 ►' .1 I 1 -�r; /, //, ` ; _ _ - _ - T11111111 1 Ilik� . ` Ill I ► I . , }1111► I i �l I '� - - 11 ; 1 , I1 1I I ` 1 II \ IC ' 1 1..-• • . - '. / t � - - - - _ - -\\ \I \ I Iir\ . 11 1\\I\ 1 ll ' t\\V'. - - ---- - '.... --; --- --1 -: ' - - - - ------ --- --7- 1111 , I� I - _ , , '•\ It 111 , 0\1 Illii '''- ' 7-1-- -. --- "..• .-- ---":„- -----,••-`,/ - _ • - ... ._ _._.- ') 1 111i V\\\ \ il 1 / / ,/ ,,.-- /-- ,----,.. .---- - - -- .. ._ ..- 1 1 i 1 \\\,. \ \\ ,.\ ,, ,,,,' / ,../ ,,,\ \\ \ \\ .,\ / • i / / ' , / I I �\ 1 ' \ ``, `` \\��1\ i\\/ rJ / r / ;l f r / , / r. / r. \ , II III \\ ) \\ i .`i . PAC TRUST - DURHAM QUARRY SITE PAC-02 TIGARD, OREGON DSH 11/13/91 STORAGE VOLUME POTENTIAL: (BOTTOM ELEVATION 132.0) ELEVATI AREA VOLUME (FT) (S.F.) (CUBIC FT.) 135 960 960- 140 2964 6944 145 5300 16023 150 9460 40737 Durham rso E�e t Road r4a Stor Q e Vol%y s;,.e r46 Ume O X44 . 142 u' y4 p r38 136 134 0 5 ro rs S T o RAG . O aRo sE?CU6/C 35 0 hds) T 45 • oz - - • 1-A-71 O( 1.S 0 17D7-15, ;T-E, AE = Coc vioti. 8. s- 63 = -3 0 t5 77/7/4 7?-a-4--77e7A/ E = x 3o i = F 4 1-0' Cr\T-cti, 171‘\--ne) 3.5-0V :-//Vc_RE /10ff. s- --- asl: A s so E =- / (.3 Uis co bf3 -••-4 VI g 0 tu7(2 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA INFILTRATION FACILITIES The approach used to estimate the required surface area of any infiltration facility (except roof drains) is: 1 . Determine the contributing acreage above the potential infiltration site. 2. Calculate the runoff coefficient (Rv) for the site either from Rv = 0.05 + (0.009 x impervious area %) or Figure B-1 in Appendix B. 3. Based on the infiltration rate of the facility site select,the appropriate chart. 4. Using the required percent of flow capture, read across from the percent of flow captured scale to the line corresponding to the Rv value calculated in step 2. Interpolate if necessary and read off the catchment ratio. 5. Calculate the minimum required infiltration area (in acres) of the facility by multiplying the catchment ratio (as a percent) by the area found in step 1 . Infiltration Facility Capture Rate Infiltration Rate : 0.5 in/hr 100% • 90%- 0 80%- Rv� l . 70%- o • 60%-. Rv-=A.5 50%- p Rv=0,95 40% `c 307:- 209. 10%- Rv = 0.05 4 0.09 • Impervious area • 09: 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 Catctrn.nt ratio (percent) Asnrnes facility has no storage. Figure 11-1: Infiltration facility capture model (0.5 ft/hr infiltration rate). GUIDANCE HANDBOOK 11-9 8/91 I I 1Z APPENDIX A - SOILS DATA Table A-4: Potentially acceptable soils for Washington County. ...... ............ . 8o4 Nan. threaepic prop I'rcwrt Astoria B .50 Briedwell B .70 Carlton 8 .10 Chehalis B 1.80 Hombre 8 5.70 Hillsboro B .90 Kilchis B/C .70 Klickitat 8 3.80 Knappe B .30 Laurelwood B 8.80 McBee B 2.10 Melbourne 8 3.80 Olyic B 9.20 Tolke B 3.90 Udiiluvents 8 .50 Willamette B 1.80 Xerocherpte B/C .70 Total 44.50 GUIDANCE HANDBOOK A_4 8/91 ., • WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 9 il TABLE 1.-Acreage and proportionate extent of the soils symbol Soil name Acres Percent sy n�,ol Soil name Acres Percent r i• I Aloha silt loam 28,801 6.3 19E Helvetia silt loam, 20 to 30 1 Amity silt loam 6,092 1.3 percent slopes 225 0.1 i 3E Astoria silt loam, 5 to 30 20E Hembre silt loam, 3 to 30 F. percent slopes 2,115 0.5 percent slopes 13,140 2.9 3F Astoria silt loam, 30 to 60 20F Hembre silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes 1,746 0.4 percent slopes 10,966 2.4 48 Briedwell silt loam, 0 to 7 20G Hembre silt loam, 60 to 90 •- - r8slopeg-' 556 0.1 percent slopes 2,003 0.4 -4 58 Briedwell stony silt loam, 0 to 7 ?IA Hillsboro loam, 0 to 3 percenrlopes 939 0.2 percent slopes 1,472 0.3 SC Briedwell stony silt loam, 7 to 12 --). 21 B Hillsboro loam, 3 to 7 _ percent slopes 193 (') percent slopes 2,062 0.5 SD Briedwell stony silt loam, 12 to 20 2 I C Hillsboro loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes 171 (') percent slopes 543 0.1 68 Carlton silt loam, 0 to 7 21 D Hillsboro loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes 578 0.1 percent slopes 260 0.1 6C Carlton silt loam, 7 to 12 22 Huberly silt loam 2,864 0.6 percent slopes 299 0.1 238 Jory silty clay loam, 2 to 7 78 Cascade silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 228 0.1 percent slopes 2,510 0.6 230 Jory silty clay loam, 7 to 12 7C Cascade silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes 594 0.1 percent slopes 3,308 0.7 23D Jory silty clay loam, 12 to 20 7D Cascade silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes 563 0.1 percent slopes 2,919 0.6 23E Jory silty clay loam, 20 to 30 7E Cascade silt loam, 20 to 30 . percent slopes 648 0.1 percent slopes 1,459 0.3 23F Jory silty clay loam, 30 to 60 7F Cascade silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes 1,503 0.3 percent slopes 1,188 0.3 24G Kilchis-Klickitat complex, 60 to 90 8C Chehalem silty clay loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes 3,362 0.7 percent slopes 1,407 0.3 25E Klickitat stony loam, 3 to 30 9 Chehalis silty clay loam, occasional I percent slopes 1,725 0.4 overflow 5,917 1.3 25F Klickitat stony loam, 30 to 60 10 Chehalis silt loam, occasional percent slopes 9,064 2.0 overflow 1,984 0.4 25G Klickitat stony loam, 60 to 90 1 1 Cornelius and Kinton silt loams, percent slopes 6,436 1.4 2 to 7 percent slopes 7,941 1.7 26 Knappa silt loam 1,203 0.3 IIC Cornelius and Kinton silt loams, 27 Labish mucky clay 1,975 0.4 7 to 12 percent slopes 9,877 2.2 288 Laurelwood silt loam, 3 to 7 11 Cornelius and Kinton silt loarns, percent slopes 6,191 1.4 12 to 20 percent slopes 8,654 1.9 28C Laurelwood silt loam, 7 to 12 I I Cornelius and Kinton silt loanis, percent slopes 8,712 1.9 20 to 30 percent slopes 4,782 1.0 280 Laurelwood silt loam, 12 to 20 I I F Cornelius and Kinton silt loams, percent slopes 13,440 2.9 30 to 60 percent slopes 2,007 0.4 29E Laurelwood silt loam, 3 to 30 12A Cornelius Variant silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 855 0.2 percent slopes 1,124 0.3 28E Laurelwood silt loam, 20 to 30 128 Cornelius Variant silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 5,862 1.9 percent slopes 389 0.1 29F Laurelwood silt loam, 30 to 60 120 Cornelius Variant silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes 4,196 0.9 percent slopes 200 (') 30 McBee silty clay loam 9,494 2.1 13 Cove silty clay loam 2,968 0.7 318 Melbourne silty clay loam, 2 to 7 14 Cove clay 2,042 0.4 percent slopes 823 0.2 I5 Dayton silt loam 2,672 0.6 310 Melbourne silty clay loam, 7 to 12 160 Delena silt loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes 3,429 0.8 percent slopes 1,665 0.4 31D Melbourne silty clay loam, 12 to 20 17B Goble silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 4,857 1.1 percent slopes 634 0.1 3IE Melbourne silty clay loam, 20 to 30 I7C Goble silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes 3,021 0.7 percent slopes 1,534 0.3 31F Melbourne silty clay loam, 30 to 170 Goble silt loam, 12 to 20 60 percent slopes 3,603 0.8 percent slopes 1,774 0.4 32C Melby silt loam, 3 to 12 I7E Goble silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes 1,093 0.2 percent slopes 632 0.1 32D Melby silt loam, 12 to 20 18E Goble silt loam, 2 to 30 percent slopes 540 0.1 percent slopes 5,904 1.3 32E Melby silt loam, 20 to 30 18F Goble silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes 414 0.1 percent slopes 2,813 0.6 33E Melby silt loam, 2 to 30 198 Helvetia silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 18,711 4.1 percent slopes 7,763 1.7 13F Melby silt loam, 30 to 60 19C Helvetia silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes 16,373 3.6 percent slopes 3,797 0.8 33G Melby silt loam, 60 to 90 19D Helvetia silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes 1,242 0.3 percent slopes 1,102 0.2 34C Olyic silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes 814 0.2 T-r-0,-Cc; c_ Ay\a61`5 J MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • SURVEYING • TRANSPORTATION 0690 SW.BANCROFT STREET • PO BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 March 15, 1995 City of Tigard Engineering Department Attention: Mr. Michael Anderson 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8199 Re: Traffic Information for Design Review PacTrust Business Center - Phase IV Project Number 295026 Dear Mr. Anderson: As discussed by telephone with you last week, Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) has undertaken a review of traffic conditions on Durham Road adjacent to the referenced project. Our research, calculations, and conclusions are presented herein. The project involves construction of 184,625 gross square feet of flexible office, warehouse, and light manufacturing. This type of development is best characterized in the ITE Trip Generation Manual as Land Use Code 130, Industrial Park. Generated Trips: ADT: 1,679 vehicles/day PM Peak Hour: 161 total trips 79% Exit = 127 21% Enter = 34 Existing traffic counts were obtained by MEI staff on March 8, 1995; PM peak hour totals are shown in Figure 1. The project trip distribution is estimated to be: • 30% west (Durham Road) • 60% south on 72nd (primarily to 1-5) • 10% north on 72nd (primarily to 1-5) The PM peak hour trip generation was assigned to the two studied intersections based on this distribution scenario. The trip assignments are shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 presents the combined traffic in the PM peak hour in the study area. As requested by the City of Tigard, the estimated traffic from the Bingham property has been added to this "combined traffic" scenario. F:\W P DATA\95-03\95026\15 L 1.k c Mr. Michael Anderson Project Number 295026 March 15, 1995 Page 2 The intersections in the study area were then analyzed for vehicular capacity, PM peak hour, and the existing and combined development conditions. The analysis was conducted using Highway Capacity Manual methods and NCAP software: Intersection Existing Conditions Combined Conditions Delay V/C Level of Service Delay V/C LCS Boones Ferry @ Durham 30.35 0.848 D 37.59 0.910 D Durham @ 72nd 14.08 0.421 B 19.33 .600 C According to Abe Shalal at Kittleson & Associates (traffic consultants to W & H Pacific on the Durham Road project), only a lengthening of the southbound to westbound right-turn lane on Boones Ferry Road is included in the County project. A level of service "C" could be achieved at the Durham/Boones Road intersection upon implementation of a right-turn overlap (southbound to westbound) with the eastbound to northbound left-turn movement. Although this improvement is easily implemented, it is not required, at this time, since a L.O.S. "D" is maintained upon full development of the PacTrust and Bingham projects. In conclusion, the existing street and signalization improvements in the study area are adequate to serve the PacTrust Phase IV project. The calculations summarized herein are attached for your reference. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions you may have. Sincerely, David G. Larson, P.E. Vice President DGL/kc Enclosure cc: Dennis Woods - Mackenzie/Saito & Associates PacTrust F:\W P DATA\95-03\95026\15 L 1.k c J<<- P • A W > N N 0 r C 70 N CO w i OT CL 70 287 X18 Z0 0 91---0- X322 o 0 288—. 4,-11 \ N N • 16— PROJECT SITE 124 t I ff (\ILLL�JJJ) M N FIGURE 1 DRAWN BY: DMB EXISTING TRAFFIC CHECKED BY: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: 3-6-95 JOB NUMBER: 295056 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201—0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 OOTEMP \F:\USERS\OMB\056F003 DMB 03/10/95 13:34 1:1.00 I 1 -_- 0 /\ K s� 6 �-A • K<F,1,,- ÷--.0 • 09 A w > �oP cN O �� z N. 0 >- 0 cc ,J w CC L D i W • w CL 10 •-43 O 0 ti -5 ✓ m v1r B (A) st • GINGHAM i SITE 13—• PROJECT SITE 7s ti b (B) CO FIGURE 2 DRAWN BY: DMB TRIP DISTRIBUTION + ASSIGNMENT CHECKED BY: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: 3-6-95 JOB NUMBER: 295056 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation -- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 © MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 DOTEMP \F:\USERS\DMB\056E002 DMB 03/10/95 14:17 1:1.00 i I -_- 0 P I ' /\ FFy� /1 ,o�'• A > e-°P �, z 0 r c , 0, D C M II I N DO W D l �W a (I) 23 287 ``18 D ZO OD 141*—. X412 0 m C 288 X16 cn 1 r N A BINGHAM SITE 29—" X27• PROJECT SITE 40*—• X47* 200—,,, x-75= qtr U N • N * NOTE: TRIPS FOR MEGA FOODS (BINGHAM) SITE INCLUDED FIGURE 3 DRAWN BY: DMB COMBINED TRAFFIC CHECKED BY: PM PEAK HOUR DATE: 3-6-95 JOB NUMBER: 295056 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation —— 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 OOTEMP \F:\USERS\DMB\056F003 OMB 03/10/95 14:15 1:1.00 1 1 _ INPUT WORKSHEET Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:AEXPM VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS SW B-F ROAD N/S ST. [ 818] 18 SB TOTAL 1 1 1 - 12.0 I 322 <- [ 351] < v > 12 . 0 I 12.0 -WB TOTAL (N) 523 287 8 RT TH LT 11 v < > NORTH v <"--RTH-12 .0 '-1 v---LT-12 .0 '-1 1-12.0 '-LT " 1-12.0 '--TH---> IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12.0 '-RT v ., 1.Volumes < > 2 .Lanes, lane widths LT RTH SW DURHAM RD 3 .Movements by lane " 287 12 .0 I E/W STREET 4.Parking locations - I 12 .0 241 5 .Bay storge lngths [ 666] -> 91 1 1 290 <"> 2 6 . Islands E/B TOTAL - [ 533] 7 .Bus stops v 288 N/B TOTAL TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Ap Grd. % HV Adj .Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type EB +0.0 0. 9 N 0 0 0 . 94 20 Y 15 3 WB +0. 0 0. 9 N 0 0 0. 94 20 Y 15 3 NB +0 .0 1. 3 N 0 0 0 . 94 20 Y 15 3 SB +0 . 0 0 . 5 N 0 0 0 . 94 20 Y 15 3 Grade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING OR OR * * * D + + * * * I ***** <***** <***** **> <+**> <+* A * * v v G v " " v ,.R * A ***** *****> *****> <** <**+> *+> M + + * * * V V * * * Tim- G= 4.0 G= 10.0 G= 0 .0 G= 20 .0 G= 4.0 G= 11.0 G= 0 . 0 G= 29.0 ing Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Ptmd/Actl A A A A A A A A Protected turns: ****" 0000" I Permitted turns: ++++" I Cycle Length 90 Sec MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date:3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:AEXPM VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Appr. Mvt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flw rt Number Lane Adj . Prop. Volume Hour Rate Group in Ln of Utiliz Flow of (vph) Factor Vp Grp Vg Lanes Fctr,U V,vph LT or RT PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Plt , Prt LT 287 0. 94 306 A 306 1 1.00 306 1 .00 LT EB TH 91 0 . 94 97 E 97 1 1.00 97 * RT 288 0. 94 307 P 307 1 1.00 307 1.00 RT LT 11 0 . 94 12 A 12.' 1 1.00 12 1.00 LT WB TH 322 0. 94 343 N 362 1 1.00 362 * RT 18 0. 94 19 0 .05 RT LT 290 0 . 94 309 A 309 1 1.00 309 1 . 00 LT NB TH 241 0 . 94 256 N 258 1 1. 00 258 * RT 2 0 . 94 2 0 . 01 RT LT 8 0. 94 9 A 9 1 1.00 9 1.00 LT SB TH 287 0. 94 305 E 305 1 1. 00 305 * RT 523 0. 94 556 P 556 1 0 . 80 445 1.00 RT LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + V V MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date:3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:AEXPM SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP Ideal No. Ln.W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk AreaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat Sat. of Fw Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt F1wRt 1 2 Flow Lns S Ap My pcphgp N T. 9-5 T. 9-6 T. 9-7 T. 9-8 T. 9-9 T.9-10 T. 9-11 T. 9-12 (vphg) A 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0. 950 1702 EB E 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1.000 1.000 1.000 , 1.000 1 . 000 1. 000 1792 P 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 840 1.000 1506 A 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 950 1702 WB N 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 992 1.000 1777 A 1800 1 1 .000 0. 993 1 .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 950 1699 NB N 1800 1 1.000 0. 993 1 .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 999 1.000 1786 A 1800 1 1.000 0. 998 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1706 SB E 1800 1 1. 000 0. 998 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1796 P 1800 1 1.000 0. 998 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 .840 1. 000 1509 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:AEXPM CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LANE GROUP 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Adjusted Ad. Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp v/C Crit. 1 2 Flow Rate Flw.Rt Ratio Capac. Ratio ? Appr. Mvmt. v s v/s g / C c,vph X Lane (vph) (vphg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Group A 306 - 1702 0. 180 - 0. 189 322 0. 952 *** EB E 97 - 1792 0.054 - 0.367 657 0 . 148 - P 307 - 1506 0 .204 - 0.367 552 0 .556 - A 12 - 1702 0 .007 - 0.044 76 0 . 159 - WB N 362 - 1777 0 .204 - 0 . 222 395 0 . 917 *** A 309 - 1699 0. 182 - 0.200 340 0. 909 *** NB N 258 - 1786 0 . 144 - 0.478 853 0 . 302 - A 9 - 1706 0 .005 - 0.044 76 0 . 119 - SB E 305 - 1796 0 . 170 - 0. 322 579 0 .527 *** P 445 - 1509 0. 295 - 0.322 486 0. 915 - Cycle Length= 90. Osec, Lost Time/Cycle,L= 12.Osec, S(v/s)ci= 0. 735, Xc=0 .848 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A A E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + V V MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date:3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:AEXPM LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_&_LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr Ratio Ratio Length dl Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl Ap My (sec) (vph) T. 9-13 (6+8) *9 9-1 9-1 A 0 . 952 0 . 189 90.0 27 . 43 322 27 . 35 1.00 54. 78 E EB E 0 . 148 0 . 367 90 .0 14. 50 657 0 .01 0 .85 12 . 33 B 31. 98 D P 0 .556 0.367 90.0 17 . 23 552 0. 95 0.85 15 .45 C A 0. 159 0.044 90.0 31.45 76 0.00 1.00 31.53 D WB N 0. 917 0. 222 90.0 25 . 98 395 18 .42 0.85 37. 74 D 37.55 D A 0. 909 0.200 90.0 26 . 75 340 19.36 1.00 46. 12 E NB N 0. 302 0 . 478 90.0 10. 90 853 0 .06 0.85 9 . 32 B 29. 37 D A 0 . 119 0.044 90 .0 31.39 76 0.03 1.00 31.43 D SB E 0. 527 0. 322 90.0 18. 93 579 0. 73 0. 85 16. 71 C 26.01 D P 0. 915 0.322 90.0 22.28 486 15 . 69 0.85 32. 28 D Intersection Delay 30. 35 sec/veh, Intersection LOS D Table 9 . 1 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI INPUT WORKSHEET Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:ACOMPM VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS SW B-F ROAD N/S ST. [ 818] 18 SB TOTAL 1 1 1 - I I 12.0 i 412 <- [ 446] < v > 12.0 I 12.0 -WB TOTAL (N) 523 287 8 RT TH LT 16 v I > NORTH v <"--RTH-12.0 '-1 v---LT-12.0 '-1 1-12 . 0 '-LT---- 1-12 . 0 '--TH---> IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12.0 '-RT---v 1 .Volumes • < > 2 .Lanes, lane widths LT RTH SW DURHAM RD 3 .Movements by lane " 287 12.0 I E/W STREET 4.Parking locations - I 12 .0 241 5 .Bay storge lngths [ 716] -> 141 1 1 290 <"> 2 6 . Islands E/B TOTAL - [ 533] 7 .Bus stops v 288 N/B TOTAL TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Ap Grd. % HV Adj .Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type EB +0 .0 0 . 9 N 0 0 0 . 94 20 Y 15 3 WB +0.0 0 . 9 N 0 0 0. 94 20 Y 15 3 NB +0 . 0 1. 3 N 0 0 0 . 94 20 Y 15 3 SB +0 . 0 0 . 5 N 0 0 0. 94 20 Y 15 3 Grade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING OR OR * * * D + + * * * I ***** <***** <***** **> <+**> <+* A * * v v G v " " v R * * A ***** *****> *****> <** <**+> *+> M + + * * * V V * * * Tim- G= 4.0 G= 10 .0 G= 0.0 G= 23 . 5 G= 4.0 G= 11.0 G= 0 .0 G= 25 . 5 ing Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Ptmd/Actl A A A A A A A A Protected turns: ****" 0000" I Permitted turns: ++++" I Cycle Length 90 Sec MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection: SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date:3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:ACOMPM VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Appr. Mvt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flw rt Number Lane Adj . Prop. Volume Hour Rate Group in Ln of Utiliz Flow of (vph) Factor Vp Grp Vg Lanes Fctr,U V,vph LT or RT PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Plt , Prt LT 287 0. 94 306 A 306 1 1. 00 306 1.00 LT EB TH 141 0 . 94 150 E 150 1 1.00 150 * RT 288 0 . 94 307 P 307 1 0 . 70 215 1 . 00 RT LT 16 0 . 94 17 A 17 1 1.00 17 1 . 00 LT WB TH 412 0. 94 438 N 457 1 1.00 457 * RT 18 0 . 94 19 0.04 RT LT 290 0. 94 309 A 309 1 1.00 309 1. 00 LT NB TH 241 0 . 94 256 N 258 1 1.00 258 * RT 2 0 . 94 2 0 . 01 RT LT 8 0 . 94 9 A 9 1 1.00 9 1.00 LT SB TH 287 0 . 94 305 E 305 1 1. 00 305 * RT 523 0 . 94 556 P 556 1 0. 70 389 1. 00 RT LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection: SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date:3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:ACOMPM SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP Ideal No. Ln.W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk AreaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat Sat. of Fw Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt FlwRt 1 2 Flow Lns S Ap My pcphgp N T. 9-5 T. 9-6 T. 9-7 T. 9-8 T. 9-9 T. 9-10 T. 9-11 T. 9-12 (vphg) A 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 950 1702 EB E 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1. 000 1. 000 1 .000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1792 P 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 0 . 840 1. 000 1506 A 1800 1 1. 000 0. 996 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1702 WB N 1800 1 1.000 0. 996 1 . 000 1.000 1. 000 1.000 0. 993 1. 000 1780 A 1800 1 1 .000 0 . 993 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1. 000 1. 000 0 . 950 1699 NB N 1800 1 1 .000 0 . 993 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1.000 0 . 999 1 . 000 1786 A 1800 1 1.000 0 . 998 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 950 1706 SB E 1800 1 1.000 0 . 998 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 000 1796 P 1800 1 1.000 0 . 998 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 840 1. 000 1509 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection: SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:ACOMPM CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LANE GROUP 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Adjusted Ad. Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp v/C Crit. 1 2 Flow Rate Flw. Rt Ratio Capac. Ratio ? Appr. Mvmt . v s v/s g / C c,vph X Lane (vph) (vphg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Group A 306 - 1702 0 . 180 - 0 . 189 322 0 . 952 *** EB E 150 - 1792 0 . 084 - 0 . 406 727 0 . 206 - P 215 - 1506 0 . 143 - 0 . 406 611 0 . 352 - A 17 - 1702 0 . 010 - 0 . 044 76 0 . 225 - WB N 457 - 1780 0 . 257 - 0 . 261 465 0 . 983 *** A 309 - 1699 0 . 182 - 0 . 200 340 0 . 909 *** NB N 258 - 1786 0 . 144 - 0 . 439 784 0 . 329 - A 9 - 1706 0 . 005 - 0 . 044 76 0 . 119 - SB E 305 - 1796 0 . 170 - 0 . 283 509 0 . 600 *** P 389 - 1509 0 . 258 - 0 . 283 428 0 . 910 - Cycle Length= 90 . Osec, Lost Time/Cycle, L= 12 . Osec, S (v/s)ci= 0 . 788 , Xc=0 . 910 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A - E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:ACOMPM LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_&_LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr Ratio Ratio Length dl Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl Ap My (sec) (vph) T. 9-13 (6+8 ) *9 9-1 9-1 A 0. 952 0. 189 90.0 27 . 43 322 27. 35 1.00 54. 78 E EB E 0 . 206 0 . 406 90 .0 13 . 19 727 0.02 0.85 11 . 23 B 31. 37 D P 0 . 352 0 . 406 90 .0 14. 10 611 0. 15 0.85 12. 11 B A 0. 225 0 .044 90.0 31. 54 76 0.26 1.00 31. 81 D WB N 0 . 983 0.261 90.0 25 . 12 465 28 . 10 0. 85 45 . 24 E 44. 76 E A 0. 909 0. 200 90.0 26. 75 340 19.36 1.00 46 . 12 E NB N 0. 329 0 . 439 90 .0 12. 59 784 0.09 0 .85 10. 78 B 30.04 D A 0 . 119 0 .044 90 .0 31 . 39 76 0.03 1.00 31 . 43 D SB E 0 .600 0 . 283 90.0 21. 16 509 1.42 0.85 19. 20 C 27.62 D P 0. 910 0 . 283 90.0 23 . 67 428 16.49 0.85 34. 13 D Intersection Delay 32. 59 sec/veh, Intersection LOS D Table 9 . 1 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI INPUT WORKSHEET Intersection: SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM .PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:J4Go ytj y" Z ',,Aill 9.464? /u24.; 0 1, • VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS SW B-F ROAD N/S ST. [ 818] 18 ^ SB TOTAL 1 1 1 - I l I I l 12.0 l 12 .0 412 <- [ 446] < v > 12.0 -WB TOTAL (N) 523 287 8 RT TH LT 16 v 11 < I > NORTH v <"--RTH-12 . 0 '-1 v---LT-12.0 '-1 1-12.0 '-LT---^ 1-12.0 '--TH---> IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12.0 '-RT---v 1.Volumes < > 2.Lanes, lane widths LT RTH SW DURHAM RD 3 .Movements by lane ^ 287 12.0 l E/W STREET 4.Parking locations - 12.0 241 5 .Bay storge lngths [ 716] -> 141 1 1 290 <^> 2 6. Islands E/B TOTAL - [ 533] 7 .Bus stops v 288 N/B TOTAL TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Ap Grd. % HV Adj .Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type EB +0.0 0 . 9 N 0 0 0. 94 20 Y 15 3 WB +0.0 0. 9 N 0 0 0. 94 20 Y 15 3 NB +0.0 1. 3 N 0 0 0. 94 20 Y 15 3 SB +0 . 0 0.5 N 0 0 0 . 94 20 Y 15 3 Grade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING OR OR * * * D + + * * * I ***** <***** <***** **> <+**> <+* A * * v v G v o ^ o ^ v R <0000 * <0000 * ^ A ***** *****> ***** M + + 000 * 000 * * v v v * v * * Tim- G= 5. 0 G= 15. 0 G= 0. 0 G= 26. 0 G= 4. 0 G= 12. 0 G= 0. 0 G= 18.0 ing Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Ptmd/Actl A A A A A A A A Protected turns: ****^ 0000" l Permitted turns: ++++^ 1 Cycle Length 90 Sec MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:AEXPMRTO VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Appr. Mvt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flw rt Number Lane Adj . Prop. Volume Hour Rate Group in Ln of Utiliz Flow of (vph) Factor Vp Grp Vg Lanes Fctr,U V,vph LT or RT PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Plt , Prt LT 287 0. 94 306 A 306 1 1.00 306 1.00 LT EB TH 141 0. 94 150 E 150 1 1.00 150 * RT 288 0 . 94 307 P 307 1 1.00 307 1. 00 RT LT 16 0 . 94 17 A 17 1 1.00 17 1.00 LT WB TH 412 0 . 94 438 N 457 1 1.00 457 * RT 18 0.94 19 0.04 RT LT 290 0. 94 309 A 309 1 1.00 309 1. 00 LT NB TH 241 0 . 94 256 N 258 1 1.00 258 * RT 2 0. 94 2 0 . 01 RT LT 8 0. 94 9 A 9 1 1.00 9 1.00 LT SB TH 287 0. 94 305 E 305 1 1.00 305 * RT 523 0. 94 556 P 556 1 1.00 556 1.00 RT LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A " E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date:3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:AEXPMRTO SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP Ideal No. Ln.W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk AreaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat Sat. of Fw Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt FlwRt 1 2 Flow Lns S Ap My pcphgp N T. 9-5 T. 9-6 T. 9-7 T. 9-8 T.9-9 T. 9-10 T. 9-11 T. 9-12 (vphg) A 1800 1 1. 000 0 . 996 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1702 EB E 1800 1 1.000 0 . 996 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1792 P 1800 1 1.000 0. 996 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 .840 1.000 1506 A 1800 1 1.000 0 .996 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1702 WB N 1800 1 1.000 0. 996 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0. 992 1.000 1777 A 1800 1 1.000 0. 993 1 .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 950 1699 NB N 1800 1 1.000 0. 993 1 . 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 999 1.000 1786 A 1800 1 1.000 0 . 998 1 .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1706 SB E 1800 1 1.000 0 . 998 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1796 P 1800 1 1.000 0. 998 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.840 1.000 1509 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date: 3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:AEXPMRTO CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LANE GROUP 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Adjusted Ad. Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp v/C Crit. 1 2 Flow Rate Flw.Rt Ratio Capac. Ratio ? Appr. Mvmt. v s v/s g / C c,vph X Lane (vph) (vphg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Group A 306 - 1702 0. 180 - 0.256 435 0. 703 *** EB E 150 - 1792 0 .084 - 0.489 876 0. 171 - P 307 - 1506 0 . 204 - 0 . 733 1104 0 . 278 - A 17 - 1702 0 . 010 - 0.056 95 0 . 180 - WB N 457 - 1777 0.257 - 0 . 289 513 0.890 *** A 309 - 1699 0. 182 - 0.211 359 0 .862 *** NB N 258 - 1786 0 . 144 - 0.367 655 0 . 394 - A 9 - 1706 0 . 005 - 0.044 76 0 . 119 - SB E 305 - 1796 0. 170 - 0.200 359 0. 849 *** P 556 - 1509 0 . 368 - 0.522 788 0. 706 - Cycle Length= 90. Osec, Lost Time/Cyc1e,L= 12.Osec, S(v/s)ci= 0. 789, Xc=0.910 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection: SW DURHAM RD @ SW BOONES FERRRY RD Date:3-8-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:AEXPMRTO LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_&_LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr Ratio Ratio Length dl Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl Ap My (sec) (vph) T. 9-13 (6+8) *9 9-1 9-1 A 0 . 703 0 . 256 90 .0 23. 11 435 3.49 1.00 26 . 60 D EB E 0 . 171 0 . 489 90 .0 9 . 75 876 0.01 0.85 8 . 30 B 13 . 36 B P 0 . 278 0 . 733 90 .0 3 .05 1104 0.04 0.85 2. 63 A A 0. 180 0.056 90.0 30 .81 95 0.10 1.00 30. 92 D WB N 0.890 0.289 90.0 23.28 513 12.31 0.85 30.25 D 30.27 D A 0 . 862 0.211 90.0 26 .02 359 13.04 1.00 39.06 D NB N 0. 394 0. 367 90.0 16 .03 655 0.21 0.85 13 . 81 B 27 .57 D A 0 . 119 0 .044 90 .0 31. 39 76 0.03 1.00 31. 43 D SB E 0. 849 0.200 90.0 26 . 37 359 11. 91 0.85 32. 53 D 19. 54 C P 0. 706 0.522 90. 0 12. 36 788 2.01 0.85 12 . 22 B Intersection Delay 21.38 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Table 9. 1 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI INPUT WORKSHEET Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date: 3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:BEXPM VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS SW 72ND AVENU N/S ST. [ 0] 0 " SB TOTAL 1 - I 0 <- [ 0] < v > 12 .0 -WB TOTAL (N) 13 176 0 RTH 0 v III < NORTH v 1-12 . 0 '-LT-- IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12 . 0 '-RT v 1.Volumes < I 2.Lanes, lane widths LT TH 3 .Movements by lane " 16 12.0 1 E/W STREET 4.Parking locations - 1 12 . 0 143 5 .Bay storge lngths [ 0] -> 0 1 1 262 <"> 0 6. Islands E/B TOTAL - [ 0] 7 .Bus stops v 124 N/B TOTAL TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Ap Grd. % HV Adj .Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (% ) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type EB +0. 0 4.0 N 0 0 0. 93 20 Y 15 3 WB +0 . 0 10.0 N 0 0 0. 93 20 Y 15 3 NB +0 .0 4.0 N 0 0 0. 93 20 Y 10 3 SB +0 . 0 6 .0 N 0 0 0 . 93 20 Y 10 3 Grade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING * D * I <+* A v G R " " * A <** * ***** M * * + * * v Tim- G= 35.0 G= 27. 5 G= 18 . 5 G= 0 . 0 G= 0.0 G= 0. 0 G= 0. 0 G= 0. 0 ing Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Ptmd/Actl A A A Protected turns: ****" 0000" 1 Permitted turns: ++++" 1 Cycle Length 90 Sec MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date: 3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:BEXPM VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Appr. Mvt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flw rt Number Lane Adj . Prop. Volume Hour Rate Group in Ln of Utiliz Flow of (vph) Factor Vp Grp Vg Lanes Fctr,U V,vph LT or RT PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Plt , Prt LT 16 0. 93 17 A 17 1 1.00 17 1.00 LT EB TH 0 0 .93 0 * RT 124 0 . 93 133 P 133 1 0. 90 120 1.00 RT LT 0 0. 93 0 0.00 LT WB TH 0 0 . 93 0 * RT 0 0. 93 0 0 . 00 RT LT 262 0. 93 281 A 281 1 1.00 281 1.00 LT NB TH 143 0. 93 154 E 154 1 1.00 154 * RT 0 0 . 93 0 0.00 RT LT 0 0 . 93 0 0. 00 LT SB TH 176 0 .93 189 N 203 1 1. 00 203 * RT 13 0 . 93 14 0.07 RT LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date:3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:BEXPM SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP Ideal No. Ln.W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk AreaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat Sat. of Fw Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt F1wRt 1 2 Flow Lns S Ap My pcphgp N T. 9-5 T. 9-6 T. 9-7 T. 9-8 T.9-9 T.9-10 T. 9-11 T. 9-12 (vphg) A 1800 1 1.000 0. 980 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 950 1676 EB P 1800 1 1 .000 0 . 980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0. 840 1 .000 1483 • WB A 1800 1 1.000 0. 980 1. 000 1 . 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1676 NB E 1800 1 1. 000 0. 980 1.000 1 .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1764 SB N 1800 1 1.000 0 . 970 1.000 1 .000 1.000 1.000 0.890 1. 000 1554 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + V V MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection: SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date:3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:BEXPM CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LANE GROUP 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Adjusted Ad. Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp v/C Crit. 1 2 Flow Rate Flw.Rt Ratio Capac. Ratio ? Appr. Mvmt. v s v/s g / C c,vph X Lane (vph) (vphg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Group A 17 - 1676 0 .010 - 0.206 344 0 . 049 - EB P 120 - 1483 0 . 081 - 0.206 305 0 . 394 *** • WB A 281 - 1676 0 . 168 - 0. 389 652 0.431 *** NB E 154 - 1764 0 . 087 - 0.728 1284 0 . 120 - SB N 203 - 1554 0. 131 - 0.306 475 0 .428 *** Cycle Length= 90.Osec, Lost Time/Cycle,L= 9.Osec, S(v/s)ci= 0 . 379, Xc=0 . 421 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date: 3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:BEXPM LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_&_LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr Ratio Ratio Length dl Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl Ap My (sec) (vph) T. 9-13 ( 6+8)*9 9-1 9-1 A 0.049 0. 206 90. 0 21. 81 344 0 .00 1.00 21. 81 C EB 20.53 C P 0. 394 0 . 206 90 .0 23 . 49 305 0 .45 0.85 20. 35 C • WB 0.00 * A 0. 431 0. 389 90.0 15 . 34 652 0.30 1.00 15 . 64 C NB E 0. 120 0 . 728 90 .0 2 . 78 1284 0 .00 0.85 2 . 36 A 10 . 94 B SB N 0.428 0 . 306 90 .0 18 . 97 475 0. 39 0.85 16. 46 C 16.46 C Intersection Delay 14.08 sec/veh, Intersection LOS B Table 9 . 1 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ E N P * **** ****> ****> ++++ + + v v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI INPUT WORKSHEET Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date:3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:BCOMPM 1 VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS SW 72ND AVENU N/S ST. ,, [ 219] 27 SB TOTAL 1 1 - 12.0 I 47 <- [ 149] < v > I 12.0 -WB TOTAL (N) 17 176 26 RTH LT 75 v III < > NORTH v <"--RTH-12. 0 '-1 v---LT-12.0 '-1 1-12.0 '-LT-- IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1-12.0 '-RTH--v> 1 .Volumes < > 2 .Lanes, lane widths LT RTH 3 .Movements by lane "' 29 12 .0 I E/W STREET 4.Parking locations - I 12 .0 143 5 .Bay storge lngths [ 269] -> 40 1 1 282 <-> 20 6. Islands E/B TOTAL - [ 445] 7 .Bus stops v 200 N/B TOTAL TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS Ap Grd. % HV Adj .Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button Arr. pr (% ) Y/N Nm (Nb) (pd/hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type EB +0 .0 4.0 N 0 0 0 . 93 20 Y 15 3 WB +0.0 10.0 N 0 0 0 . 93 20 Y 15 3 NB +0.0 4.0 N 0 0 0 .93 20 Y 10 3 SB +0 .0 6 .0 N 0 0 0 .93 20 Y 10 3 Grade:+up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type 1-5 PHASING OR OR ,. * . * * D + + * * * I ***** <***** <***** **> <+**> <+* A * * v v Gv ,. v ,. R * A ***** *****> *****> <** <**+> *+> M + + * * * V V * * * Tim- G= 5.0 G= 0 .0 G= 2 .0 G= 26.0 G= 5 .0 G= 20 .0 G= 0 .0 G= 20. 0 ing Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Y+R= 3 Ptmd/Actl A A A A A A A A Protected turns: ****" 0000" I Permitted turns: ++++" I Cycle Length 90 Sec MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date:3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No.295056 City/State:BCOMPM VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Appr. Mvt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Fiw rt Number Lane Adj . Prop. Volume Hour Rate Group in Ln of Utiliz Flow of (vph) Factor Vp Grp Vg Lanes Fctr,U V,vph LT or RT PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Plt , Prt LT 1 0 . 93 31 A 31 1 1.00 31 1 . 00 LT EB TH 40 0. 93 43 N 258 1 1.00 258 * RT 200 0. 93 215 0 . 83 RT LT 75 0. 93 81 A 81' 1 1.00 81 1 . 00 LT WB TH 47 0. 93 50 N 79 1 1. 00 79 * RT 27 0 . 93 29 0 . 37 RT LT 282 0 . 93 303 A 303 1 1.00 303 1. 00 LT NB TH 143 0 . 93 154 N 175 1 1.00 175 * RT 20 0. 93 21 0. 12 RT LT 26 0. 93 28 A 28 1 1.00 28 1. 00 LT SB TH 176 0. 93 189 N 207 1 1.00 207 * RT 17 0 . 93 18 0 .09 RT LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ N * + v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date:3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:BCOMPM SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP Ideal No. Ln.W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk AreaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat Sat. of Fw Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt FlwRt 1 2 Flow Lns S Ap My pcphgp N T. 9-5 T. 9-6 T. 9-7 T. 9-8 T. 9-9 T. 9-10 T. 9-11 T. 9-12 (vphg) A 1800 1 1.000 0 . 980 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0 . 950 1676 EB N 1800 1 1.000 0 . 980 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 867 1. 000 1530 A 1800 1 1.000 0. 950 1.000 1.000 V.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1625 WB N 1800 1 1.000 0. 950 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0. 941 1.000 1610 A 1800 1 1.000 0. 980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1676 NB N 1800 1 1.000 0. 980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0. 981 1. 000 1730 A 1800 1 1.000 0 . 970 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0 . 950 1659 SB N 1800 1 1.000 0. 970 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 0. 986 1. 000 1722 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-(*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A ^ N * + v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date: 3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:BCOMPM CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET LANE GROUP 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Adjusted Ad.Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp v/C Crit. 1 2 Flow Rate Flw.Rt Ratio Capac. Ratio 7 Appr. Mvmt. v s v/s g / C c,vph X Lane (vph) (vphg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Group A 31 - 1676 0 .018 - 0.056 93 0 . 333 - EB N 258 - 1530 0 . 169 - 0 . 289 442 0 . 584 *** A 81 - 1625 0 .050 - 0. 111 181 0 . 449 *** WB N 79 - 1610 0.049 - 0. 344 555 0. 142 - A 303 - 1676 0 . 181 - 0 . 311 521 0. 581 *** NB N 175 - 1730 0 . 101 - 0.478 827 0 . 212 - A 28 - 1659 0 .017 - 0 .056 92 0. 304 - SB N 207 - 1722 0 . 120 - 0. 222 383 0.541 *** Cycle Length= 90 .Osec, Lost Time/Cycle,L= 12.Osec, S(v/s)ci= 0 . 520, Xc=0 . 600 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A N * **** ****> + v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI Intersection:SW DURHAM RD @ SW 72ND AVE Date: 3-9-95 Analyst:DMB TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther Project No. 295056 City/State:BCOMPM LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_&_LOS LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr Ratio Ratio Length dl Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LOS 1 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl Ap My (sec) (vph) T. 9-13 (6+8 ) *9 9-1 9-1 A 0 . 333 0.056 90.0 31.08 93 0.80 1.00 31. 88 D EB N 0 . 584 0.289 90.0 20 . 80 442 1.46 0 .85 18 . 92 C 20 . 31 C A 0 .449 0. 111 90.0 28 . 44 181 1.22 1.00 29 . 66 D WB N 0 . 142 0 . 344 90.0 15 .46 555 0.01 0. 85 13 . 14 B 21. 50 C A 0 . 581 0 . 311 90.0 19 . 81 521 1. 21 1.00 21.03 C NB N 0 . 212 0 . 478 90.0 10 . 38 827 0.02 0 .85 8. 84 B 16. 56 C A 0 . 304 0 .056 90 .0 31.03 92 0 . 59 1.00 31. 62 D SB N 0.541 0 . 222 90 . 0 23 .52 383 1. 22 0.85 21.02 C 22 . 28 C Intersection Delay 19.33 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Table 9 . 1 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, ### = PROTCTD & PERMTTD] A - N * **** ****> + v MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI SDR 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY (Page 1 of - 1 EXHIBIT a 2S113AC-00100 ` 2S113AC-00101 WASHINGTON COUNTY PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES FACILITIES MGMT-AMIN 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WMI 150 N FIRST AVE, RM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97224 HILLSBORO OR 97124 2S113AC-00102 2S113AC-00200 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES SITTEL, RALPH A AND BETTY J 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WMI c/o NORRIS, PETER PORTLAND OR 97224 MYERS, GARY 16520 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 2S113AC-00300 2S113AC-00400 SITTEL, RALPH A AND BETTY J DALE FAMILY TRUST c/o NORRIS, PETER BY WALLACE DALE MYERS, GARY 16650 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD 16520 SW UPR BOONES FRY RD TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 2S113AC-00500 2S113AC-00600 PARKER, RUTH A SCHISLER FAMILY TRUST 16730 SW UPR BOONES FY RD 16760 SW UPPER BOONES FY RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S113AC-01000 2S113AC-01100 SCHECKLA, DARYL D SCHECKLA, DARYL D 10520 NW JACKSON QUARRY RD 10520 NW JACKSON QUARRY RD HILLSBORO OR 97124 HILLSBORO OR 97124 2S113AC-01200 2S113AD-01700 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WASHINGTON COUNTY BINGHAM INVESTMENT CO FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 3939 SW ST HELENS ROAD 150 N FIRST AVE, RM B-7 PORTLAND OR 97210 HILLSBORO OR 97124 2S113AD-01800 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WMI PORTLAND OR 97224 J L. v.1. I v I_ II/ -'r .,0`v 6 1 .. . • . . , WASHI VGTC N COUNTY OREGON SCALE I11: 100' 65' SEE MAP 25 1 13A 889.15 1900 4 °V Sr E �r 5.75 AC. ,� 9 D 1325' M VACATED 9N/564 a T 117 1 132 132' 132'(-) 132' T 132' -k .! 0 N O I I Z� I `�' I /CO t 10 „I 9 , h 8 I 7 I . 6 in 5 l I N L 495' S 99° 10'E 249.76 v t 1800 I 0 I I I . 6.6// I AC. 117.75`S 132' 132' 132' 132_ _132' J 132'._ig_ _ + 00 87.4 -4 Z6 / 400 I I I I I CD '^ 166 AL o I I I I I �� z o. N Z. ♦ w _• • ■• N I I 12 I $3 14 I 15 <\ 1 16 • 17 J2s '-'' 18 s I S U N N . I I C./ I2374 ' • ° �Q J 8c, I1 Q co I I I m , to o \ 118.49' 132' �_ 132' _132'_ 132_ '� 132' ,T5 VACATED ATE = S.W. B 30' 20' -p- 4 116.51' 132' 132' 132' 132' t Z 1 54-90041 84-6955 in it 500 700 132 1700 I I I , .234C /.B3 AC m 6.60.4C I a) 2... I II s7.4 / 80 30 nI 29 I 28 I 27 1 26 ``rV 24 23. I 1 I I I . 1 600 <� ` I I I 3.24Aa � I 'S 132' 20'F. ' 1 119.25' 1 _152'_ __132'_ _132' 65' 67'_ 132' 1 T 66' 66 50' j 204 I I I I I I II 11 I I I I 134 L 4 : 5 : 6 37 ° 381 g 31 4I 32 .I 33 N I �„ ■ pl I I I I I I I I rN I I Il za I 1 I c 99°37'W I I 1 - 13 cli SDR 95-0008 ss' — 6 = 6o' ,,.. ...e; 152' J J IE/PACIFIC -� REALTY ;�•. <:,•..,,,;,,,,.,1,�- .,,,;•s. ,w 66=961) L- — / J / SEE MAP 2S I I3DA PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: F618 '1 , I°lgG APPLICANT: AGENT: D Er1N'5 W(NaQS Phone: Phone: CD. +1-k- rj�? PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: /� TAX MAP & TAX LOT: S/ /.'4C ^ /e30 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S) : SiTe VEo?/4FA / PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ` , F o t Icl\su a ,,1Ib\ —t-R Lt,v. ptex COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: }� ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. ft. Minimum lot width: 5:5 ft. Setbacks: front- S ft. side- ft. , rear-_ ft. garage- ft. corner- ft. from both streets. Maximum site coverage: .7S-%/ C7 Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: % ad mEt1 74. Ctoktr11S Maximum building height: US ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 fee less lot is created through the minor land partition process. created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 fe of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to th ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS T -7 ^� Streets: 30 ft. from centerline of YDO } � , �Lp�‘111) Established as : ft. from Lower i ensity zones: fte< along the site' s boundary Page 1 &14 '7)0/hPia ix iId if C✓G5/i 7l/v a s /Kiae b/ y wd/ g44-1 xrift? *11? SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020) : Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A maximum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3 . The structure will not abut a residential zone district. PARKING AND ACCESS R e q u i r e d parking for this type of use: SEE 1R.IOCc. 03 O Secondary use required parking: L40 MS% of required spaces may be designated compact-only spaces. Standard parking space dimensions: -D €e. Y. 1.8 ft. 'i .. Compact parking space dimensions: 8, —t ' x 1({ Disabled person parking: All parking areas providing in excess of five required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and designated disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated by the Oregon Revised Statutes and Americans with Disabilities Act (see handout) . A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided. Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non-residential uses, commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile parking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storge parking areas, must be paved. 30/ /C52q.. ,1 '� Minimum number of accesses : Minimum access width: 2 -t . c Maximum access width: 40 t. I 6-0 /4-6, pal/ Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. Parking area landscaping and screening: Required. See Landscaninq section below. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. Page 2 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. No buildings, signs, trees or other visual obstructions are allowed between 3 and 8 feet above grade in these areas. LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size. Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one tree per seven parking spaces must be planted in and around parking areas in order to provide a canopy effect. Landscaped screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of-way must be provided. BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required. Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and sidewalks. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18 .100. Required buffer widths applicable to your proposal area: ft. along north boundary _ ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary _ ft. along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along 1'? J7/ yr_tttJ& Page 3 SIGNS Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development application. SENSITIVE LANDS Other Agency Permits : ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS (T.) Cl'At\M>\- (i) t. E Lrtt-'do? L3) S t c:, Pa:7 tz 5 . jo g=c9::, At/ REVIEW PROCEDURES Staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4 PM on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week' s applications for processing. No applications will be accepted after 4 :30 PM. Maps su1ntit ,id iagar p .aat ,on shall be folded iu aduance fit? 8 by inches One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be ...:..:............... submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur approximately days after an application is accepted as complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to Page 4 review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of public hearings . A 10 day appeal period follows all decisions . An appeal on this matter would be heard by the e- IR NIr,zZ CDMM155'o A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the Planning Division. The pre-applicati nference and the notes of the conference;: are intended to info_ .. the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code rera_rements applicable to development of a particular site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant tc discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference. notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that showed apply to the development of Your site plan_ Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or recuirements . It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and. read the Community Development `ode or ask any questions of City staff relative :to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre-application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre-application conference, unless is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division.R PREPARED BY: W l� �, N PLANNING DIVISION 1�UF H,4 1C WON QctO_ aaal Page 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (i) identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (ii) to provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (iii) to review the application review process with the applicant including identifying who will be the final decision maker for the application. The extent of public improvements and dedications to be required of the applicant will be recommended by City Engineering Department staff and approved by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision maker by City staff until all commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your project. Unless noted otherwise, the primary contact for questions related to public facility issues is / gineering Department, 639-4171 Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public to increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification rights-of-way width specified by the Community Development Code. Approval of a development application for this site will require dedication of right-of-way for 1. to feet from centerline. 2 . to feet from centerline. Street improvements: 7424.571,4t7 A./e ' M /14 p c v 77 PGAAJ .Sfqe&-VA./ , rAl/'1-7' 1. street improvements will be necessary along Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. street improvements will b- necessar along - ( 6/ 14q, ) Needed street improvements will include feet of pavement from centerline, curb and gutters, storm sewers, a five-foot wide sidewalk, necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. Page 6 In some cases where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In these cases, as a condition of development approval, the property owner(s) must execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner' s right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve 1. Pedestrianways/bikeways : 6' Sanitary Sewers: The closest sanitary sewer to this property is an inch line located ,7ae Yt'1 . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer' s responsibility to extend .1112 the sewer along the �)proposed develo ment site' s /`r" Water Supply: The Tigard Water District (Phone: 639-1554) ow—t-ire--Ttectn - ■ .' - - 1) provides public water service in the area of this site. The appropriate Water District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance This action placed into effect an increased street development fee on all new development in Washington County. The City of Tigard has adopted the county's program. The City Traffic Impact Fee program will collect fees from new development based on the development' s projected impact on the transportation system. Developing properties will be required to pay based on the number of trips they are projected to generate. The TIF is calculated based on type of use, size of project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until issuance of occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5, 000.00 . PAY Page 7 STORMWATER QUALITY FEES/FACILITIES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43, Surface Water Management Regulations, requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in lieu of their construction. The resolution requires that a fee and/or construction of a water quality facility be built. The fee is based on the amount of impervious surface; for every 2640 square feet or portion thereof, the fee shall be $280. The City of Tigard determines if a fee or facility shall be built. , 9X)--,c447 c.- �Necessary storm sewer improvements: 44 77 vJ� 7 .i�7-2741 v( A z4 -A fl 'a 41 z 50/1/0V STREET OPENING PERMIT No work within a public right-of-way shall commence until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS On all projects that require a grading plan the applicant shall submit with the grading plan a typical floor plan for each lot which shall have the elevations of four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PHONE: 639-4171 jo:preapnon Page 8 Staff Vh7 Date CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements . This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639-4171 . ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) [~`J B) Owner' s signature/written authorization [� C) Title transfer instrument D) Assessor' s map [ ] E) Plot or site plan [+] F) Applicant' s statement [✓} ( .. . .t [ ] (H) Filing fee ($ SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information showing (No. of copies 1 � ) : [ ] 1) Vicinity Map [*-1 2) Site size & dimensions [� 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [-.] 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [- 1 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [ ] b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ ] c) Unstable ground [4.-} d) Areas with high seasonal water table [ ] e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ ] f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [✓J 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats [ ] b) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features : a) Rock outcroppings [ ] b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level [ ] 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [ � 9) Location and type of on and off—site noise sources [ ] 10) Location of existing utilities and easements [� 11) Location of existing dedicated right—of—ways [--3" B) Site Development Plan showing (No. of copies 18 ) : [ ] 1 ) The proposed site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals 3) The location, dimensions and names of all : a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining [� properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 1 b) . . oposed streets or other public .ys & easements on the site. [-� c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [✓]" 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [-� b) Parking and circulation areas [---J— c) Loading and services areas [-r d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation [�]' e) Outdoor common areas, [-T f) Above ground utilities E. 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all : a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [-j' b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [� 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions [� 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [—]' 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [•�]� 10) The location of mailboxes [ ] 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [•-'f 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ ] C) Grading Plan (No. of copies la ) [ ] The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done . [-�` 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report [IT b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals [� c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated (� [ ''f 0) Architectural Drawings (No. of copies 18 ) : [ ] The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on—site; and [/f 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure . [vr E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies t ) : [ ] The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings [ APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 2 3) Locat_ .1 of terraces, decks, shelters, may areas and common open spaces [,} 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials . [/r The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses : 1) Soil conditions . [ ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used . [ ] F) Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18 . 114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ ] G) Traffic generation estimate [ ] H) Preliminar •artition or lot line ad 'ustment ma• showin. (No. of Copes ) : 1) The owner of the subject par.-1 [ 3 2) The owne ' s authorized age [ 3 3) The map s le, (20,50, 100 or 200 feet=1), inch north arrow and ,ate [ ] 4) Description •f parcel •cation and boundaries [ ] 5) Location, wid h and :mes of streets, easements and other public ays thin and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all .e manent buildings on and within 25 feet of all • operty lines [ ] 7) Location and wi•' of all water courses [ ] 8) Location of an tr -s with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet abov- group• level [ 3 9) All slopes • eater th-n 25% [ ] 10) Location o, existing u . ilities and utility easements [ ] 11) For major land partitio which creates a public street: a) The proposed right—o• —way location and width [ ] b) A .caled cross—sectio, of the proposed street •lus any reserve stria [ ] 12) Any . •plicable deed restrict •ns [ ] 13) Evi•ence that land partition ' 11 not preclude e 'ficient future land division where applicable [ ] I) Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map and data sh ing(No. of Copies ) : 1) Scale e sling 30, 50, 100 or 200 fee o the inch and limit to one phase per shee [ ] 2) The proposed me of the subdiv4ion [ ] 3) Vicinity map sh ing propertyxs relationship to arterial and collector streets [ 3 4) Names, addresses anatele phone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, 'urveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of application/ [ ] 6) Boundary lines of tract to N subdivided [ ] 7) Names of adjac t subdivisio or names of recorded owners of adioining parcels o unsubdivided land [ ] 8) Contour 1i s related to a City—e blished bench- mark at —foot intervals for 0-10% g des greater than 0% [ ] APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 3 9) e ,_. pose, location, type and size all of the f••llowing (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision) : // [ 3 a) Public and private right—of—ways and/easements [ 3 b) • blic and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ] c) Doiestic water mains including fire hydrants [ 3 d) Maj r power telephone transmission lines (50 000 volts or greater) / [ 3 e) Water, ourses [ 3 f) Deed r,servations for parks, open space, pathways and of er land encumbrances/ [ 3 10) Approximate p an and profiles of/proposed sanitary and storm sewers ith grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 3 11) Plan of the proposed water dist/ribution system, showing pipe si .es and the 10/cation of valves and fire hydrants . / [ 3 12) Approximate center ine profiles showing the finished grade of all stree 's including street extensions for a reasonable distance •eyoid the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ 3 13) Scaled cross sections •f proposed street right—of—way; [ ] 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow / [ 3 15) Location, width and d ' rec :ion of flow of all water- courses and drainag• ways [ 3 16) The proposed lot covfigurat ons, approx mate lot dimensions and lo, numbers . Where lots are to be used for purpose- other than residential, it shall be indicated upon -uch lots [ 3 17) The location of 11 trees with diameter 6 inches or greater measu -d at 4 feet abov- ground level , and the location .f proposed tree pl,ntings, if any [ 3 18) The existing ses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the struct res, and a statement of hich structures are to r- ain after platting C ] 19) Suppleme al information including: a) Pro•osed deed restrictions (if an ) [ 3 b) Prof of property ownership [ 3 c) A proposed plan for provision of su•division improvements [ 3 20) Exis ing natural features including rock out- cr• ppings, wetlands and marsh areas . [ ] 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot •racticably •e shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. [ 3 J) Other Inform ion [ 3 Sol a+ 4c (2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 4 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Will D'Andrea May 30, 1995 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer O . RE: SDR 95-0008 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY Description: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a five (5) multi-tenant industrial building complex comprising 180, 000 square feet on a site at the southwest corner of SW Durham Road and SW 72nd Avenue . The lot consists of 11 .78 ac . and is also known as Tax Lot 2S1 13AC 0100 . Findings : 1 . TRAFFIC: The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis prepared by MacKenzie Engineering Inc . , dated March 15, 1995 . The report provides a projection of the traffic to be generated by the proposed site development and an analysis of the effects of the traffic on the existing signalized street intersections of SW Durham Road with both SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and SW 72nd Avenue. Based on the data collected and the estimated trip distribution, the report indicates that the projected traffic should have minimal effect and that the existing facilities and street improvements at each intersection are adequate . The Level of Service at the SW Durham Road/SW Upper Boones Ferry Road intersection would remain at Level C and the SW Durham Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection would lower to Level D . The latter intersection included the projected traffic for the Mega Foods site approved in 1994 for a site on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue . 2 . STREETS : The site plan shows access to SW Durham Road, an arterial street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan, with two driveways . No access is proposed to SW 72nd Avenue, a Major Collector. Both streets have been constructed to their appropriate street standard with the exception of sidewalk construction. The applicant should construct sidewalk along the entire street frontage of the site . The site also connects to the end of SW Findlay Road, at the southwesterly corner of the site, and the applicant indicates that this road could not be extended easterly due to the topographic constraints of the site and properties to the south. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-08 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 1 SW Findlay Road presently extends westerly in the adjoining City of Durham, to an intersection with SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, providing access to three residences and two small businesses . Due to the both the topography and the change in use, staff concurs with the applicant . However, the street end design should be approved and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Durham. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along the site frontage of SW 72nd Avenue, and the applicant should place the facilities located along the street frontage underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 3 . SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Durham Road. The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development . The applicant proposes to construct the sewer crossing the site to the southerly boundary to City standards with the possible dedication of the system to the City. The work should be included within the public improvement permit for the site. Minimum City easement shall be 15 feet wide . 4 . STORM SEWER: The site slopes to the northwest and sheet flows onto the adjacent property into an existing pond that was designed to receive the storm water from the site development of this contiguous parcel . This facility should be maintained by the owner. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No . 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The applicant' s proposed facility on the adjoining parcel will comply with these regulations and should be maintained by the property owner. The applicant should provide copies of the maintenance agreement for the water quality facility for approval by the Engineering Department prior to recording. Recommendations : PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1 . The applicant shall obtain a public improvement permit for the construction of the proposed driveway aprons, concrete sidewalks, sanitary sewer, streetlights, and underground utilities to serve the site . Improvements shall be designed and constructed to City standards . The applicant shall dedicate a 15 foot wide easement on City forms for the public portion of the sewer construction. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson,Engineering Dept . (639-4171) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-08 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 2 2 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE : these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements . STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 3 . The applicant shall obtain a permit from the City of Durham for the street end closure for SW Findlay Road, and provide a copy of the plans and permit to the City of Tigard Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT : Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept . (639-4171) 4 . The applicant shall provide a hydrology and hydraulic study of the proposed storm drain systems for approval of the Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 5 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No . 91-47 . NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times . The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. 6 . The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage of SW 72nd Avenue, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639-4171) 7 . Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No . 94- 18 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use . 8 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 9 . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings . The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February, 1994 . " STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) . 10 . The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall meet the requirements of NPDES and Tualatin Basin Erosion Control Program. 11 . The applicant shall provide copies of the agreement with the adjoining property for the maintenance of the water quality facility serving both sites . ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-08 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 3 IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST . 1 . SECTION 18 . 160 . 170 Improvement Agreement A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall : 1 . Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2 . Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant . B. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract . 2 . SECTION 18 . 160 . 180 Bond A. As required by Section 18 . 160 . 170, the applicant shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1 . An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2 . A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3 . Cash. B. The applicant shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance . C. The applicant shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. D . 18 . 164 . 150 Installation: Prerequisite/Permit Fee 1 . No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-08 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 4 the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. E . 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required 1 . Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . 2 . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. F. 18 . 164 .200 Engineer' s Certification Required 1 . The applicant' s engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the public works improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance . 2 . The owner shall provide a Developer-Engineer Agreement as prescribed by the Public Improvement Design Standards, dated May 26, 1994, which requires that the Project Engineer provide direct supervision and control, and primary inspection of the public works construction, and final certification to the City. 3 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS . Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. APPROVED : a7. Randa 1 R. Woole City Engineer N:\ENGINEER\SDR95-08.mja ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-08 MCKENZIE/PACIFIC REALTY PAGE 5