Loading...
SDR1995-00016 SD R95 - 00016 MCMENAMIN ' S PUB - JOHN BARLEYCORNS CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0016 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MIS 95-0015 MCMENAMINS PUB APPLICATION: The applicant requests the following development applications: 1) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 3,630 square foot restaurant; and 2) Lot Line Adjustment request to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. Zoning: I-P (Professional Industrial). Location: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE MICHAEL ANDERSON OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 1. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit to reconstruct the existing driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway and the new sewer service lateral for the restaurant. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 2. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall submit a lot line adjustment survey showing the existing and proposed lot lines, and legal descriptions of the parcels for review and approval by the Engineering Department. The private sewer service lateral easement for the existing industrial building across the restaurant site shall be shown on the final plat. STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering Department. 4. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 90-65. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. 5. The applicant shall submit a drainage plan and calculations for the proposed water quality facilities for approval by the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 1 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION 6. The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 7. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Impervious surface/landscape calculations. This calculation shall include the total development site, both to ensure McMenamin's compliance as well as the existing development's compliance. Developments within the I-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping except that 20% can be provided when: 1) Street trees are installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than two inches at four feet in height; 2) The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of ten feet; and 3) All applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied. b. Forty-four parking spaces for the McMenamin's proposal. The applicant shall either adjust the property lines to provide the required parking for each respective use on their respective parcel or provide a reciprocal parking agreement between the two lots. c. Screening of the 12 parking spaces in the southeast corner of the property adjacent to SW Sequoia Parkway d. Location and screening of the trash enclosure. e. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall provide a written hauler sign-off regarding the location and compatibility of service equipment. 8. Deed restrictions shall be submitted which limit the area to be used for retail sales, convenience sales and personal services, children's day care, personal services facilities, and eating and drinking establishments to a maximum of 20% of the entire square footage of the development complex. The I-P (Industrial Park) zone limits these uses to 20% of the entire square footage of the development complex. 9. An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted to the Police Department for review and approval. Staff Contact: Kelly Jennings, Police Department. SCR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 2 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. All site improvements shall be installed as approved per the revised site plan. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Backround: In 1990, a Site Development Review (SDR 90-0015NAR 90-0020) approval was granted for a 21,000 square foot warehouse building with an attached 3.000 square foot office. This project was not developed. In 1994, a Zone Change (ZON 94-0012) was granted from I-L (Light Industrial) to I-P (Industrial Park). No other development applications have been found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located between SW Sequoia Parkway and 1-5, south of SW Bonita Road. A furniture store is located to the east of this property. A Home Depot store is located to the south of this site, along with other office and industrial buildings owned by Pacific Realty Associates. Properties to the north and west are zoned I-L (Light Industrial). Properties to the east and south is zoned I-P (Industrial Park). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The parcel has frontage on SW Sequoia Parkway. The 1.7 acre parcel is currently developed a Smetco warehouse building. The portion of the property to be developed is relatively flat is covered by grass and trees. The applicant requests for a lot line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. The applicant also requests a site development review approval to construct a 3,630 square foot restaurant building on the northwestern corner of parcel. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 3 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION 4. Agency Comments: The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: The applicant shall submit the proposed parking lot and exterior wall lighting plan for review and approval. Northwest Natural Gas has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: The existing structure is served by a line from SW Sequoia Parkway on the south end of the property. GTE has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: Developer to place conduit to GTE's specifications. The City of Tigard Building Division, City of Tigard Public Works, Tualatin Valley Water District, Unified Sewerage Agency, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue and Portland General Electric have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing a restaurant. A restaurant is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Eating and Drinking Establishment. Section 18.68.030(2)(o) states that Eating and drinking establishments, either separately or in combination with other listed uses, shall not exceed a total of 20 percent of the entire square footage with the development complex. The total building square footage within this development complex is 17,910 square feet (an existing 14,280 building plus the 3,630 square foot proposed building). A total of 3,582 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed for these uses. The proposed building contains a mini-brewery of approximately 360 square feet devoted to manufacturing of McMenamin's beer. The area developed as a restaurant is 3,270 square feet (3,630sf - 360 square feet), which is under the 3,582 square feet allowed. The applicant shall provide deed restrictions which specify the limitations imposed on general retail sales, convenience sales and personal services, children's day care, personal services facilities, and eating and drinking establishments. This is necessary because the development complex consists of multiple lots and ownership's. The entire development complex is not allowed more than 20% of the above limited uses. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 4 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.68.050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the I-P zoning district. The site has an average lot width of approximately 110 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the I-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping except that 20% can be provided when: 1) Street trees are installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than two inches at four feet in height; 2) The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of ten feet; and 3) All applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied. The applicant has not provided the areas devoted to impervious surfaces and landscaping. The applicant shall provide calculations demonstrating compliance with the minimum landscape requirement. This calculation shall include the total development site, both to ensure McMenamin's compliance as well as the existing development's compliance. Setbacks: Section 18.68.050 states that the front yard setback is 35 feet and that on corner lots the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet on any lot facing a street. The maximum building height is 45 feet. The applicant is proposing a building height of 32 feet, thereby meeting this requirement. The proposed building satisfies the front yard setback of 35 feet. The applicant is requesting an exception to the 20 foot corner lot setback requirement, to allow a 16 foot setback, in accordance with section 18.120.170. Section 18.120.170 allows the Director to grant an exception to the setback yard requirements based on findings that the approval will result in the following: 1) An exception which is not greater than 20 percent of the required setback; 2) No adverse effect to adjoining properties in terms of light, noise levels, and fire hazard; 3) Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and on-site; 4) A more efficient use of the site which would result in more landscaping; and 5) The preservation of natural features which have been incorporated into the overall design of the project. Section 18.120.170 is satisfied as: 1) The 4 foot exception is 20% of the required setback; 2) There will be no effect on adjoining properties; 3) There will be safe access: 4) Landscaping will continue to meet the minimum standards; 5) Natural features are not impacted by this adjustment. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(0) requires a minimum of one parking space per 50 square feet of dining area plus 1 space for every 2 employees. The plan shows approximately 2,000 square feet of dining area, thereby requiring 40 parking spaces. The applicant states that there will be 8 employees per shift, thereby requiring 4 parking spaces. The total number of required parking spaces for this use is therefore 44 parking spaces. The existing Smetco warehouse building requires the provision of 14 parking spaces, based on the ratio of one space per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. The total required parking for both uses is 58 parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of approximately 70 parking spaces. The site plan shows the provision of 39 spaces to be provided on the MCMENAMINS parcel for the proposed building. The applicant shall either adjust the property lines to provide the required parking for each respective use on their respective parcels or provide a reciprocal parking agreement between the two parcels. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 5 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 2 disabled parking space if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 2 disabled person parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Three bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development. The plan shows the provision of three spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which requires less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This criteria is satisfied as access is provided to SW Sequoia Parkway, as well as the access road, in accordance with the access standards. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The plan provides a walkway connection to SW Sequoia Parkway, thereby satisfying this criteria. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Calculations to show compliance with Code required minimum landscape percentages will be required. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The plan shows the provision of 9 existing, Crimson King Maple trees, thereby satisfying this requirement. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The landscape plan shows the provision of trees within the parking area, in accordance with this section. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides screening of the 12 spaces in the southeast corner of the property adjacent to SW Sequoia Parkway. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 6 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION Screening of Refuse Containers and Service Facilities : Section 18.100.110(B) and (D) requires that such facilities be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. A revised plan shall be submitted which shows the location of a facility and indicates how the trash enclosure will be screened in accordance with this criteria. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan this requirement will be satisfied. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off. The applicant will need to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall provide a written hauler sign- off regarding the location and compatibility of service equipment. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1. TRAFFIC IMPACTS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study entitled "McMenamin's Pub - Traffic Impact Analysis", dated July, 1995, prepared by the Transportation Consulting Group. The report provides an estimate of the traffic to be generated by the site development and examines the effects of this traffic to the intersection of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road, and the driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway. SW Sequoia Parkway was constructed with the original development in 1989, and the existing driveway was constructed at that time. This driveway will provide the main access to the restaurant. In addition, the site is contiguous to a frontage access road that is parallel with SW Bonita Road, that also provides access to the Gervurtz Furniture Store located on the property to the east. The applicant proposes that the existing driveway onto the frontage road provide a common access to both the restaurant and the existing on-site industrial building. The applicant should provide an agreement for the joint use and maintenance for this driveway. SDR 95-0016iMIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION The traffic report indicates that the intersection of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road experiences delays to the northbound left-turn movement due to the long queue backing up on SW Bonita Road from the SW 72nd Avenue intersection. However, the report points out that with the changes under-construction at the SW Bonita Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection, this queue will be less and therefore, provide additional clearance at the SW Sequoia Parkway intersection. The traffic report concludes that the driveway serving the site from SW Sequoia Road is located over 290 feet from SW Bonita Road and provides sufficient length for the projected queue on SW Sequoia Parkway to allow traffic to enter and leave the proposed restaurant site satisfactorily. 2. STREETS: As noted above, the proposed development will take access from driveways that connect to both SW Sequoia Parkway and the frontage road parallel with SW Bonita Road. The existing driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway is to be widened and relocated slightly to the south with the proposed on-site construction with this application. The applicant should obtain a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department for this proposed construction. Otherwise, both street frontages have been constructed to City standards and no further public improvements are required. However, this development is required to pay traffic impact fees (TIF) to contribute to the financing of improvements which may be needed in the area as the result of continuing development. 3. SANITARY SEWER: The site is currently served by the 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Sequoia Parkway. The main has sufficient capacity for this development and no additional public improvements are required. However, the new service lateral for the restaurant will require a permit and the applicant should include this work in the request for the Street Opening Permit for the driveway construction. In addition, the existing service lateral for the existing on-site industrial building may require relocation. A private sewer service lateral easement should be established across the restaurant site for the benefit of the industrial site. The easement should be shown on the lot line adjustment survey final plat. 4. STORM SEWER: The site slopes in a westerly direction towards SW Sequoia Parkway. The stormwater run-off will be collected in a private underground system and directed to two water quality facilities located on-site between SW Sequoia Parkway and the proposed restaurant. The applicant should submit a final drainage design for approval by the Engineering Department that is consistent with both the quality and quantity standards of the Unified Sewerage Agency. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 3 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The proposed on-site water quality facility will comply with this requirement and will be privately maintained. SECTION IV- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS - LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT The applicant is proposing to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. Community Development Code Section 18.162.060 contains standards for approval of a lot line adjustment request: 1. An additional parcel is not created by the lot line adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustment is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structure(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district: and 3. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district. The proposed lot line adjustment is consistent with these standards. No new parcel will be created by the adjustment. Both lots will continue to meet the dimensional requirements of the I-P zone. All site development improvements applicable to the parcels will remain consistent with Code requirements. In addition to meeting the above standards, a lot line adjustment must also meet the following criteria applicable to lots created through the minor land partition process (Code Section 18.162.050): A. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. B. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. C. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. SDR 95-0016iMIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 9 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION D. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. E. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. F. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. G. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. H. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. J. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one- hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestriarvbicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria A is not applicable as there is no minimum lot size in the I-P zone. Criteria B,C, and D are satisfied. The adjusted lot widths are approximately 110 and 75 feet, thereby exceeding the minimum 50 foot minimum lot width requirement of the I-P zone. The lots have approximately 410 and 110 feet of frontage on SW Sequoia Parkway and an access road, thereby exceeding the minimum 15 foot frontage requirement. As indicated on the site plans, setbacks are satisfied. Criteria E, F and J are not applicable to these lots because neither are flag lots nor are they within the floodplain. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards thereby satisfying criteria G. Criteria H shall be satisfied as a reciprocal easement shall be recorded. Criteria I is satisfied as accessways are in compliance with access standards. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 10 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision:THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON sPkat-Qmhpr 4. 1495 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. September 4, 1995- 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard. Oregon 97223 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner 1 /J / APPROVED B —Richard Bewersdorff DATE Senior Planner SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 2_ McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION J . 0 . 's Q -0 a z 7 N �(1 h ' -.--.--"----------- o• • RD 9. ITE 1"' --\. 7 C. 9 W 0 i CI m a C C Z 0 _ D z z a l ...I CL \ . CARDINAL LN Q CC a cn 0 G in -y w m z LL w 0 REDWOOD LN F- I Z >- 1 , I - ( l I V 0 0 cc ct KABLE LN 1 .. la- 1 -I VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: SDR 95- 0016 I MIS 95-0015 I NOTH ( scale ;-:200• TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT FEET MCMENAMINS PUB 0 400 800 2S112AD-0300 & 0400 1k\DISDATTTIGCOV\HELM)WO\SXNtl 3/U/11e REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 251995 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Will D'Andrea August 24 , 1995 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer !:ii RE: SDR 95-0016; MIS 95-0015 SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. - "McMENAMIN PUB" Description: The applicant requests Site Development Review and approval to construct a 3, 630 sft restaurant on a site located at the SE corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. The site consists of two tax parcels, 2S1 12AD 0300 & 0400, and the applicant requests approval of a lot line adjustment to provide one lot each for the new restaurant and the existing industrial building located at the rear of the property. The total site area is 1 . 52 acres. Findings : 1 . TRAFFIC IMPACTS : The applicant has submitted a traffic study entitled "McMenamins Pub - Traffic Impact Analysis" , dated July, 1995, prepared by the Transportation Consulting Group. The report provides an estimate of the traffic to be generated by the site development and examines the effects of this traffic to the intersection of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road, and the driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway. SW Sequoia Parkway was constructed with the original development in 1989, and the existing driveway was constructed at that time. This driveway will provide the main access to the restaurant . In addition, the site is contiguous to a frontage access road that is parallel with SW Bonita Road, that also provides access to the Gervertz Furniture Store located on the property to the east . The applicant proposes that the existing driveway onto the frontage road provide a common access to both the restaurant and the existing on-site industrial building. The applicant should provide an agreement for the joint use and maintenance for this driveway. The traffic report indicates that the intersection of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road experiences delays to the northbound left-turn movement due to the long queue backing up on SW Bonita Road from the SW 72nd Avenue intersection. However, the report points out that with the changes under- construction at the SW Bonita Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection, this queue will be less and therefore, provide additional clearance at the SW Sequoia Parkway intersection. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0016 McMENAMIN PUB PAGE 1 , The traffic report concludes that the driveway serving the site from SW Sequoia Road is located over 290 feet from SW Bonita Road and provides sufficient length for the projected queue on SW Sequoia Parkway to allow traffic to enter and leave the proposed restaurant site satisfactorily. 2 . STREETS : As noted above, the proposed development will take access from driveways that connect to both SW Sequoia Parkway and the frontage road parallel with SW Bonita Road. The existing driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway is to be widened and relocated slightly to the south with the proposed on-site construction with this application. The applicant should obtain a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department for this proposed construction. Otherwise, both street frontages have been constructed to City standards and no further public improvements are required. However, this development is required to pay traffic impact fees (TIF) to contribute to the financing of improvements which may be needed in the area as the result of continuing development . 3 . SANITARY SEWER: The site is currently served by the 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Sequoia Parkway. The main has sufficient capacity for this development and no additional public improvements are required. However, the new service lateral for the restaurant will require a permit and the applicant should include this work in the request for the Street Opening Permit for the driveway construction. In addition, the existing service lateral for the existing on-site industrial building may require relocation. A private sewer service lateral easement should be established across the restaurant site for the benefit of the industrial site. The easement should be shown on the lot line adjustment survey final plat . 4 . STORM SEWER: The site slopes in a westerly direction towards SW Sequoia Parkway. The stormwater run-off will be collected in a private underground system and directed to two water quality facilities located on-site between SW Sequoia Parkway and the proposed restaurant . The applicant should submit a final drainage design for approval by the Engineering Department that is consistent with both the quality and quantity standards of the Unified Sewerage Agency. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0016 McMENAMIN PUB PAGE 2 • site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The proposed on-site water quality facility will comply with this requirement and will be privately maintained. Recommendations : PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1 . The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit to reconstruct the existing driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway and the new sewer service lateral for the restaurant . STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) 2 . A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways . The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171) . 3 . The applicant shall submit a lot line adjustment survey showing the existing and proposed lot lines, and legal descriptions of the parcels for review and approval by the Engineering Department . The private sewer service lateral easement for the existing industrial building across the restaurant site shall be shown on the final plat . STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering Department (639- 4171) . 4 . Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 90-65 . The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use . 5 . The applicant shall submit a drainage plan and calculations for the proposed water quality facilities for approval by the Engineering Department . STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) 6 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47 . NOTE : This is a two part fee which is paid at different times . The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot . ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0016 McMENAMIN PUB PAGE 3 IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS . Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. APPROVED: U2 Randall R. Woole City Engineer n:\engineer\sdr95-16.mja ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0016 McMENAMIN PUB PAGE 4 •REQUEST FOR COMMENTS S A CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 OREGON TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Department FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: / • ) _ ‘,0 Sed "t„..• MEW' 1-4P ? (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: / / ��'''� Z2.6 Phone Number: —�J REQUEST FOR COMMENTS c.CEIVED PLANNING JUL 211995 CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 OREGON TO: Jim Weiskamp, General Telephone Engineering Office FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: y We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: DE (c.. oPE,k c 1)L4cE LOMOo∎r TO GTE S SPEC(F1CATi�r(5 (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: -3-c te5td4MP Phone Number: (02.0-594 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RE CEIVEp PLANNING A 4%G 0 4 CITY OF TIGARD 1995 DATE: July 19, 1995 OREGON TO: David Scott, Building Official FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: -+rin /� Phone Number: ' r ' ' / >c 3 10 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 OREGON TO: John Acker, Field Operations FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE C ECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 271995 CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 OREGON TO: Lee Walker, Unified Sewerage Agency/SWM Program FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your co • =its and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, C• • -; '\ !� • Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. %SC' PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ,U - 2 0 A9(3 c3 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. By Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: J) l L l 01444r1-i Phone Number: L io --/F REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 JUL 2 41995 OREGON TO: Scott Palmer NW Natural Gas Company FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13 125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: XXX We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: WE SERVE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE OFF SEQUOIA PKWY ON THE SOUT END OF PROPERTY, SEE ATTACHED . (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: G. SCOTT PALMER 721-2449 Phone Number: o- 10'I f all ti- Ir It 129' C3 67 J i■ m 504' EQUOI A PARKWAY 1 HWY. PERMIT #17315 513 w 2"HO 527' d EXIST L _1 90 ( ) A I } _ 2"(P)891� 553' - N 2" P 90 I Q ,:n nW --. -.0 2"-'74 �D N NU _ J iv ; U W T - 12 bl f x-4444-126 ? U i T a 4. m a p135' Ui i `n 96a - td 0 0192' — } FZ--I 260' /6777-0 C.) O D - 9 `I$ER #I ~: w 90) z 73 C7 _ —► va e,e 0_- g a'I.s. Ii C:2) CURB 37 ZJ — D C-) r VACATED 915/27 125' Ell - CURBS I°' 0 RISER #2 (90) b b JH #6600 0250' v w T ('85) #6650 1050' - -,=-4444-126 As I 6I63- 13 fV N 11' >4"------*II 11 I I I6 ,11 WASHINGTON CO. II CLACKAMAS CO. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS .sECEIVED PLANNING JUL 2 41995 CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 OREGON TO: Brian Moore, Portland General Electric FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANCLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: rk' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: - { pca2-= Phone Number: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLh,.,+ING .A IJ CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 JUL 2 41995 OREGON TO: Tualatin Valley Water FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. . MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: gWe have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: `�1L�` ,i�`,��"�' Phone Number: ( 4-Z— / II REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A CITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 19, 1995 OREGON TO: Per Attached . FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 ► SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN PUB A request for the following development applciations: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park) The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 31, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: ,________ /•• . ,,,, n '-'1 BONITA RD - I II 7 'rt's ITE 13 ; W CI 7 0 C/) m V CR 0 Z C 0 D Z Z Q a t J CARDINAL LN 0 i. (Q CC Cr, �+ 0 C '° = w cr ~ N U. w 0 REDWOOD LN z --7 )1' I"_ U 0 0 cr J cc CABLE LN \--------------1I - d VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: SDR 95-0016 \II MIS 95-0015 N01H SOda 1•-200' TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT FEET MCMENAMINS PUB 0 400 800 2S112AD-0300 & 0400 INAGIS0AT\TIOCOINIELBOW O\SX1 3/13/96 I C be l.J C J i r�'I< `.L..) SME` ^RIANGLE DEV. — MCMENAMIN'S N 2AT1CN UST FOR LAND USE 3'.DEVEL SDR -0015/MIS 95-0015 G'T12EN INVOLVE? NT TEAMS Circe one} CT Arec: (N) (5) (E) (C) " Placed 'or review:n Library CT 3ook " _CPO NO. 'CITY DEPARTMENTS Building Ctttciat/Dave Scott 4---1Police/Kelly Jennings ild Operations/John Acker _ .0-,Cty Recorder/Cathy Wheatley _ ngineenng/MIchael Anderson Permts Fcc:lltator/Jerree Gaynor Advanced Ptarrrg/Card Landsman —Water Department/Michael Miller } SPECIAL DISTRICTS I _/Pre Marshall .- Unified Sewerage Agency uatatin Valley Water District Wa. County Fre District SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 (pick-up cox) 155 N. First Street Beaverton.CR 97075 Hillsboro,CR 97124 I AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wa. Co. Ceot. of Land Use&Transportation _Boundary Commission _METRO -GREENSPACES PROGRAM 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Cregon St. #16.Suite 540 Mel Hue (CPA's/ZOA•s) Hillsboro.CR 97124 Portland.CR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland.CR 97232-2736 —Brent Curtis(CPA's) _State Highway Division .;im Tice(1GA'S) Sam Huncidi _COOT/Region 1 _Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laune Nicholson/Transportation Planning _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,CR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders _Torn Harry(Current P!cnning App's) Portland.CR 97209-4037 Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _Oregon DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1 175 Court Street.N.E. _Other _City of Beaverton Salem.CR 97310-0590 Jim Hencryx-Pnncipcl Planner _City of Portland PO Box 4755 _City of Durham Planning Director Beaverton.CR 97076 City Manger 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland.CR 97204 _City of Kng City Tigard.CR 97281-3483 City Manager _City of Lake Oswego 15300 SW 116th _City of Tualatin City Manager Kng City.CR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin.CR 97062 Lake Oswego,CR 97034 [ .> !SPECIAL AGENCIES - Gererd Telechore Portland Generci Electric _Columcia Coole -Engineering Office Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Cid Schciis Ferry Road 14200 SW 8ngocoon Court Tgard.CR 97281-3416 Beaverton.CR 97007 Beaverton.CR 97005 NW Natural Gas _Metro Area Communications/Jason Hewitt —in-Met Trcrsit Development Scott Pourer Twin Oaks Technology Center Kim Knox,Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue 1815 NW 169th Pace 5.6020 710 NE Holladay Street Portland.CR 97209-3991 Beaverton.OR 97CC6.4886 Portland.CR 97232 —TCI Ccbievsicn of Oregon —US West Corrmunicaticns —Southern Poo:tic Trcnsoortction Co. Lnaa Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney, PLS- Project Engineer 3500 SW Bona Street 421 SW Oak Street 8CC NW 6th Avenue Room 324, Union Station Porticrd,CR 97201 Portland,CR 97204 Portland.CR 97209 l STATE AGENCIES i —Aeronautics Division(CDCT) —Division of Stott) a - nts _US Postal Service Commerce Dept. -M.H. Park —Fsn&Wildlife Randy Hammock.Growth Coorcinctcr PUC _DCGAMI Cedar Mill Station _Ceot. of Envircr. duciity Portland.CR 97229-9998 l FEDERAL AGENCIES i Corps. .. _..y ree s ^ar n.:ocesocaNvIc cnc-+W ( CITY OF TIGARD AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OREGON STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named persolp6 the address ) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the day of, ._ 1995, and deposited in the United States Mail on the day o 1995, postage prepaid. ,Za . 0..*./10.111 • �► -pared Tlin / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I day of rD- , 19 � de 41! OFFICIAL SEAL IvILL :: DIANE M JELDERKS Al I -� \"(-0,7 NOTARY PUBLIC•OflEGON 7� COMMISSION N0.046t42 NOTARY PUBL fi OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 My Commission 'xpires: FILE INFO.: r � 1 NAME(S): �efttarkun.:t / ó4' CASE NO.(S): 5c0 e?,57-Gb/4/ 157-!SO• ^J TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE2//`e-.Lhr/-5 ecisio/i CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0016 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MIS 95-0015 MCMENAMINS PUB APPLICATION: The applicant requests the following development applications: 1) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 3,630 square foot restaurant; and 2) Lot Line Adjustment request to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. Zoning: I-P (Professional Industrial). Location: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE MICHAEL ANDERSON OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 1. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit to reconstruct the existing driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway and the new sewer service lateral for the restaurant. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 2. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall submit a lot line adjustment survey showing the existing and proposed lot lines, and legal descriptions of the parcels for review and approval by the Engineering Department. The private sewer service lateral easement for the existing industrial building across the restaurant site shall be shown on the final plat. STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering Department. 4. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees in accordance with Resolution No. 90-65. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. 5. The applicant shall submit a drainage plan and calculations for the proposed water quality facilities for approval by the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 1 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION 6. The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 7. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Impervious surface/ landscape calculations. This calculation shall include the total development site, both to ensure McMenamin's compliance as well as the existing development's compliance. Developments within the I-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping except that 20% can be provided when: 1) Street trees are installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than two inches at four feet in height; 2) The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of ten feet; and 3) All applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied. b. Forty-four parking spaces for the McMenamin's proposal. The applicant shall either adjust the property lines to provide the required parking for each respective use on their respective parcel or provide a reciprocal parking agreement between the two lots. c. Screening of the 12 parking spaces in the southeast corner of the property adjacent to SW Sequoia Parkway d. Location and screening of the trash enclosure. e. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall provide a written hauler sign-off regarding the location and compatibility of service equipment. 8. Deed restrictions shall be submitted which limit the area to be used for retail sales, convenience sales and personal services, children's day care, personal services facilities, and eating and drinking establishments to a maximum of 20% of the entire square footage of the development complex. The I-P (Industrial Park) zone limits these uses to 20% of the entire square footage of the development complex. 9. An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted to the Police Department for review and approval. Staff Contact: Kelly Jennings, Police Department. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 2 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. All site improvements shall be installed as approved per the revised site plan. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Backround: In 1990, a Site Development Review (SDR 90-0015NAR 90-0020) approval was granted for a 21,000 square foot warehouse building with an attached 3,000 square foot office. This project was not developed. In 1994, a Zone Change (ZON 94-0012) was granted from I-L (Light Industrial) to I-P (Industrial Park). No other development applications have been found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located between SW Sequoia Parkway and 1-5, south of SW Bonita Road. A furniture store is located to the east of this property. A Home Depot store is located to the south of this site, along with other office and industrial buildings owned by Pacific Realty Associates. Properties to the north and west are zoned I-L (Light Industrial). Properties to the east and south is zoned I-P (Industrial Park). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The parcel has frontage on SW Sequoia Parkway. The 1.7 acre parcel is currently developed a Smetco warehouse building. The portion of the property to be developed is relatively flat is covered by grass and trees. The applicant requests for a lot line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. The applicant also requests a site development review approval to construct a 3,630 square foot restaurant building on the northwestern corner of parcel. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 3 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION 4. Agency Comments: The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: The applicant shall submit the proposed parking lot and exterior wall lighting plan for review and approval. Northwest Natural Gas has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: The existing structure is served by a line from SW Sequoia Parkway on the south end of the property. GTE has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: Developer to place conduit to GTE's specifications. The City of Tigard Building Division, City of Tigard Public Works, Tualatin Valley Water District, Unified Sewerage Agency, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue and Portland General Electric have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing a restaurant. A restaurant is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Eating and Drinking Establishment. Section 18.68.030(2)(o) states that Eating and drinking establishments, either separately or in combination with other listed uses, shall not exceed a total of 20 percent of the entire square footage with the development complex. The total building square footage within this development complex is 17,910 square feet (an existing 14,280 building plus the 3,630 square foot proposed building). A total of 3,582 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed for these uses. The proposed building contains a mini-brewery of approximately 360 square feet devoted to manufacturing of McMenamin's beer. The area developed as a restaurant is 3,270 square feet (3,630sf - 360 square feet), which is under the 3,582 square feet allowed. The applicant shall provide deed restrictions which specify the limitations imposed on general retail sales, convenience sales and personal services, children's day care, personal services facilities, and eating and drinking establishments. This is necessary because the development complex consists of multiple lots and ownership's. The entire development complex is not allowed more than 20% of the above limited uses. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 4 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.68.050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the I-P zoning district. The site has an average lot width of approximately 110 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the I-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping except that 20% can be provided when: 1) Street trees are installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than two inches at four feet in height; 2) The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of ten feet; and 3) All applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied. The applicant has not provided the areas devoted to impervious surfaces and landscaping. The applicant shall provide calculations demonstrating compliance with the minimum landscape requirement. This calculation shall include the total development site, both to ensure McMenamin's compliance as well as the existing development's compliance. Setbacks: Section 18.68.050 states that the front yard setback is 35 feet and that on corner lots the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet on any lot facing a street. The maximum building height is 45 feet. The applicant is proposing a building height of 32 feet, thereby meeting this requirement. The proposed building satisfies the front yard setback of 35 feet. The applicant is requesting an exception to the 20 foot corner lot setback requirement, to allow a 16 foot setback, in accordance with section 18.120.170. Section 18.120.170 allows the Director to grant an exception to the setback yard requirements based on findings that the approval will result in the following: 1) An exception which is not greater than 20 percent of the required setback; 2) No adverse effect to adjoining properties in terms of light, noise levels, and fire hazard; 3) Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and on-site; 4) A more efficient use of the site which would result in more landscaping; and 5) The preservation of natural features which have been incorporated into the overall design of the project. Section 18.120.170 is satisfied as: 1) The 4 foot exception is 20% of the required setback; 2) There will be no effect on adjoining properties; 3) There will be safe access; 4) Landscaping will continue to meet the minimum standards; 5) Natural features are not impacted by this adjustment. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(C) requires a minimum of one parking space per 50 square feet of dining area plus 1 space for every 2 employees. The plan shows approximately 2,000 square feet of dining area, thereby requiring 40 parking spaces. The applicant states that there will be 8 employees per shift, thereby requiring 4 parking spaces. The total number of required parking spaces for this use is therefore 44 parking spaces. The existing Smetco warehouse building requires the provision of 14 parking spaces, based on the ratio of one space per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. The total required parking for both uses is 58 parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of approximately 70 parking spaces. The site plan shows the provision of 39 spaces to be provided on the MCMENAMINS parcel for the proposed building. The applicant shall either adjust the property lines to provide the required parking for each respective use on their respective parcels or provide a reciprocal parking agreement between the two parcels. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 5 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 2 disabled parking space if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 2 disabled person parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Three bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development. The plan shows the provision of three spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which requires less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This criteria is satisfied as access is provided to SW Sequoia Parkway, as well as the access road, in accordance with the access standards. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The plan provides a walkway connection to SW Sequoia Parkway, thereby satisfying this criteria. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Calculations to show compliance with Code required minimum landscape percentages will be required. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The plan shows the provision of 9 existing, Crimson King Maple trees, thereby satisfying this requirement. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The landscape plan shows the provision of trees within the parking area, in accordance with this section. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides screening of the 12 spaces in the southeast corner of the property adjacent to SW Sequoia Parkway. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 6 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION Screening of Refuse Containers and Service Facilities : Section 18.100.110(B) and (D) requires that such facilities be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. A revised plan shall be submitted which shows the location of a facility and indicates how the trash enclosure will be screened in accordance with this criteria. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan this requirement will be satisfied. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off. The applicant will need to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall provide a written hauler sign- off regarding the location and compatibility of service equipment. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1. TRAFFIC IMPACTS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study entitled "McMenamin's Pub - Traffic Impact Analysis", dated July, 1995, prepared by the Transportation Consulting Group. The report provides an estimate of the traffic to be generated by the site development and examines the effects of this traffic to the intersection of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road, and the driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway. SW Sequoia Parkway was constructed with the original development in 1989, and the existing driveway was constructed at that time. This driveway will provide the main access to the restaurant. In addition, the site is contiguous to a frontage access road that is parallel with SW Bonita Road, that also provides access to the Gervurtz Furniture Store located on the property to the east. The applicant proposes that the existing driveway onto the frontage road provide a common access to both the restaurant and the existing on-site industrial building. The applicant should provide an agreement for the joint use and maintenance for this driveway. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 7 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION The traffic report indicates that the intersection of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road experiences delays to the northbound left-turn movement due to the long queue backing up on SW Bonita Road from the SW 72nd Avenue intersection. However, the report points out that with the changes under-construction at the SW Bonita Road/SW 72nd Avenue intersection, this queue will be less and therefore, provide additional clearance at the SW Sequoia Parkway intersection. The traffic report concludes that the driveway serving the site from SW Sequoia Road is located over 290 feet from SW Bonita Road and provides sufficient length for the projected queue on SW Sequoia Parkway to allow traffic to enter and leave the proposed restaurant site satisfactorily. 2. STREETS: As noted above, the proposed development will take access from driveways that connect to both SW Sequoia Parkway and the frontage road parallel with SW Bonita Road. The existing driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway is to be widened and relocated slightly to the south with the proposed on-site construction with this application. The applicant should obtain a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department for this proposed construction. Otherwise, both street frontages have been constructed to City standards and no further public improvements are required. However, this development is required to pay traffic impact fees (TIF) to contribute to the financing of improvements which may be needed in the area as the result of continuing development. 3. SANITARY SEWER: The site is currently served by the 8 inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Sequoia Parkway. The main has sufficient capacity for this development and no additional public improvements are required. However, the new service lateral for the restaurant will require a permit and the applicant should include this work in the request for the Street Opening Permit for the driveway construction. In addition, the existing service lateral for the existing on-site industrial building may require relocation. A private sewer service lateral easement should be established across the restaurant site for the benefit of the industrial site. The easement should be shown on the lot line adjustment survey final plat. 4. STORM SEWER: The site slopes in a westerly direction towards SW Sequoia Parkway. The stormwater run-off will be collected in a private underground system and directed to two water quality facilities located on-site between SW Sequoia Parkway and the proposed restaurant. The applicant should submit a final drainage design for approval by the Engineering Department that is consistent with both the quality and quantity standards of the Unified Sewerage Agency. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 8 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. The proposed on-site water quality facility will comply with this requirement and will be privately maintained. SECTION IV - FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS - LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT The applicant is proposing to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. Community Development Code Section 18.162.060 contains standards for approval of a lot line adjustment request: 1. An additional parcel is not created by the lot line adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustment is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structure(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; and 3. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district. The proposed lot line adjustment is consistent with these standards. No new parcel will be created by the adjustment. Both lots will continue to meet the dimensional requirements of the I-P zone. All site development improvements applicable to the parcels will remain consistent with Code requirements. In addition to meeting the above standards, a lot line adjustment must also meet the following criteria applicable to lots created through the minor land partition process (Code Section 18.162.050): A. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. B. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. C. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 9 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION D. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. E. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. F. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. G. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. H. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. J. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one- hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria A is not applicable as there is no minimum lot size in the I-P zone. Criteria B,C, and D are satisfied. The adjusted lot widths are approximately 110 and 75 feet, thereby exceeding the minimum 50 foot minimum lot width requirement of the I-P zone. The lots have approximately 410 and 110 feet of frontage on SW Sequoia Parkway and an access road, thereby exceeding the minimum 15 foot frontage requirement. As indicated on the site plans, setbacks are satisfied. Criteria E, F and J are not applicable to these lots because neither are flag lots nor are they within the floodplain. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards thereby satisfying criteria G. Criteria H shall be satisfied as a reciprocal easement shall be recorded. Criteria I is satisfied as accessways are in compliance with access standards. SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 10 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision:THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON SPpt-PmbPr 4, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. September 4, 1995. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639-4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner ett2,1C e?- /1 / 4 - APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Senior Planner SDR 95-0016/MIS 95-0015 PAGE NO. 11 McMenamin's Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION 0 0 9 �C� cv o _ =fir BONILA RD ■ - • 0° .', -•• ITE I- • --41. I ii 0 • CL ..\ c-- 1 o m 'V 0 C 0 Z D Z ii Z Q J a CARDINAL LN Q - r CC Q cn 0 O `n —A 1"'" -s- w Cn F-- 2 Q 'I 0 w REDWOOD LN i-' z 7 >" I— U 0 O C J ri CABLE LN Y a VICINITY EXHIBIT MAP CASE: SDR 95- 0016 0 MIS 95-0015 NO'TH Scala V=zoo' TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT FEET MCMENAMINS PUB 0 400 800 2S112AD-0300 & 0400 M:\OISDAT\TIOCOV\NELSOWO\SXN13 3/13/05 1 111P, 0 EXHIBIT B 2S112AA-00500 2S112AA-00600 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP SPIEKER PROPE PO BOX 5909 PO BOX PORTLAND OR 97228 P D OR 97228 2S112AD-00300 2S112AD-00400 SMETS, JOHN E TRUSTEE SMETS, JOHN E TRUSS. _- 6830 SW BONITA RD 6830 SW : !•-- " • 40 PORTLAND OR 97224 •. :«°-+ OR 97224 2S112AD-00401 . . 2S112AD-00500 TIGARD, CITY OF ROGERS MACHINES==--;- 13125 SW HALL 14600 " ' ' AVENUE PO BO ="•VD OR 97223 OR 97223 2S112AD-00501 2S112AD-00600 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PACIFIC NW PROPERTIES TRUSTEE INC 9950 SW ARCTIC DRIVE 14600 SW 72ND AVE BEAVERTON OR 97005 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AD-00900 2S112AD-01100 HOME DEPOT USA, INC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P 5690 DTC BLVD SUITE 290 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WMI ENGLEWOOD CO 95125 PORTLAND OR 97224 2S112AD-00100 GEVURTZ, BURTON I TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ' 6600 SW BONITA RD 15455 HALLMARK DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 SMETS FAMILY TRUST 14633 OTTAWAY ROAD, N.E. AURORA, OR 97002 SMETS/TRIANGLE DEV. - MCMENAMIN'S SDR 95-0015/MIS 95-0015 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8 2 9 2 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)95-0016/ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(MIS)95-0015 •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. 1312 5 SW Ha 11 Blvd. MCMENAMIN'S PUB & BREWERY The Planning Director has approved,subject to conditions,a request for •Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 • ❑ Duplicate Affidal the following development applications: 1.) Site Development Review ap- proval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's res- •Accounts Payable-Terry • taurant with an exception to the corner lot,side yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback;and 2.)Lot Line Adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two (2) parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 S.W. Bonita Road (WCTM 2S 1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION of Interstate 5, south of S.W. Bonita Road and east of S.W. Sequoia Parkway. APPLICABLE_REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Develop- STATE OF OREGON, ment Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164.ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park).The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, I, Judith Koehler public support facilities,professional and administrative services, finan- being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising cial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-Tua lat i n Times manufac).uring of finished products,packaging and processing,wholesale, a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 storage,and distribution,among other uses. and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid count and state; that the =�\ j — - - Site Develop-95-0016/MIS 95-0015 TTSmetsrr/,,�� r ■ a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was publislle�t Iffy`e �A 1 entire issue of said newspaper for ONE 1 . 11 successive.. anc� E D ' .• ,° ,-__�_�l consecutive in the following issues: ■ �% IITE AUG30199 August 24 ,1995 1995 iii‘ ' ; ______./. CITY OF TIGARD I .,ALEBle/Wr \ 1_ Subscribed and sworn t efore me this2 4th day of August,19 1` CARDINAL IN ... Nota ublic for Oregon g i......10 3 i My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT ! "° °`"� J - i / The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on Septem- ber 4, 1995. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accor- dance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Com- munity Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,September-4, 1995. TT8292-Publish August 24, 1995. APPLICANT MATERIALS v A ;; - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. Sb(s2 °°1 ( OTHER CASE NO'S: '"mss RECEIPT NO. 9 -iC ' 9 j' APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: /E-7C5- 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 65 O SW &NITi9 /?O6/0 (A) Application form (1) TI6A2D , DS' c 7Z2q l (B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. /IMP 2S / /2,q() LOT 300 authorization II (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE . &717-- (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*JOHN d !l)/MIE D.5)2 (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) /fis Cn•TRUSTEES OF ThE Sf) 7S TRUST i ADDRESS /q(a.33 O 7AW Ay RD NE ONE 67R- .3081 (F) Applicant's statement CITY AU/c'URA 02 ZIP g7OOZ (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* T7I NGLE ,DEV6WP/Yi7 COMP/9"/V (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS /S%SS Dk. PHONE to ci"SOIU addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY LAkE OS6(1E60 USE' FfIZIP 7035 (H) Filing fee C$ ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow 7-y a (o,VSj R UC 7C/V 0f /9 �c MENA Approval Date: err-A-� pM�,/,/v s �r��c-uI PUS 13 FEIN& ► �� 1.6o, 300 ,CF, Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: /1/UNE Qvr 66/00-Hg/&, DEVVLO/)r5 /T / iEGU r1f'/' )01/6L 6Ef/v6 !'RAY aSSEC> CoNGv/yk EN%ZV rO,? 3/6,30 5P l3/?E?ry 4'&. 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 41A"\--e__ 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the s •ect property. llth■ j . -- r •(KSL:pm/0524P) 4 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 CASE NO. -T 1 1. GENERAL INFORMATION OTHER CASE NO'S: Sn(Z99-oo//.. RECEIPT NO. S- :?-ro77 `l PARCEL 1 APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: PROPERTY ADDRESS X830 .SL(J 13ON/11q Rog) DATE: C7� / TAX MAP AND LOT NO. in AP 2S / /2, LO j icy Application elements submitted: PROP _RTY OWNERS ONN - 11/ Q I, sin Rs' (U•�'uS'TEE 0 1 T t-R1 111 TR Sr Z (A) Application form (1) ADDRESS /'/ ,33 0 7TAGUf9y RO NE PHONE X,18-308/ (B) Owner's signatures / CITY /90YL?/q A Of' ZIP I7DOz written authorization PARCEL 2 (C) Title transfer instant PROPERTY ADDRESS 6530 801 BON/TA Ro, I (1) (D) Assessor's map (1) TAX MAP AND LOT NO. /114-12 2SI /2H ofiLDT 4'00 4 0 PROPERTY OWNERS f01//�/ . ll'IAR/E 7/9 1), S77767Slig (E) Preliminary 6 os) Map Co �USTrE/S OF 77�E Si'hETS F4/71/Li/ Tip UST' / ( 6 copies) ADDRESS /({633 OTTA1,04,1 h'0N HONE 67g-308/ (F) s CITY AvRoleg de ZIP 97002 APPLICANT*/AGENT TR/ANGLE D EV&LOPfl1 JvTCo. (G) Filing fee ($ 50) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: ADDRESS /SUSS irnwni eK I)R• PHONE 6011-50i/0 Tr,. S 'ir5 /So CITY L H k' p5W/GO C'I' ZIP 97035- FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: *When the owner and the applicant are different COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lease in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written N.P.O. NUMBER: authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or Planning Director Approval Date submit a written authorization with this application. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property Final Approval Date: request permission to adjust (number) Planning: parcels of ` and ,/ (/ Engineering: acreage or square footage) into parcels of • and .67D/ . Date Recorded and Number: (number) (acreage or square footage) bkm/LTLNEADJ.WPF k ,3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part part of this application: /VONe 6l2 ,Y P/)nffTE DEVtLOPmc/r REV/E7/1) A Pi'/ 011ogt- 6E1 N6 PRoc ES-S.-ED �0NCl2RRENTLY F R 3, 630 SF QRE72J Pv,B 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 19 j SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the - bj property. Ail 11104 )0! p ,. , , A , t PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 4 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0016 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 FILE TITLE: SMETS/TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. ► MCMENAMIN'S PUB APPLICANT: Triangle Development Co. OWNER: Smets Family Trust I 15455 Hallmark Drive, Suite 150 14633 Ottaway Road, NE Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Aurora, OR 97002 (503) 699-5010 (503) 678-3081 REQUEST: A request for the following development applications: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,630 square foot McMenamin's restaurant with an exception to the front yard setback to allow a 16 foot setback whereas, the I-P zone requires a 20 foot setback; and 2.) Lot Line adjustment to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. ZONE: I-P(Industrial Park). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, CRITERIA: 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162, 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: Joel Stevens PHONE NUMBER: (503) 293-1254 DECISION MAKING BODY - X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea (503) 639-4171 x315 SDR 95-0016 JUIy 19,1995 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT/SMETS •MCMENAMIN'S PUB&BREWERY 15455 Hallmark Drive _,Aith Suite 150 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Phone(503)699-5010 Fax(503)699-5029 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Narrative for Lot Line Adjustment Smets Family Trust I Property Tigard, Oregon July 10, 1995 The Smets Family Trust I currently owns land totaling approximately 1.68 acres at the southeast corner of SW Bonita Road and Sequoia Parkway in Tigard. The property consists of three tax lots, 200, 300, and 400 on Map 2S1 12AD with areas of approximately .16, 1.38, and .14 acres respectively (see attached tax map). An existing single story manufacturing building of approximately 14,000 SF is located on tax lots 200 and 300. The owner has filed, concurrently with this lot line adjustment application, a development review application for a proposed brew pub to be constructed on what is now tax lots 300 and 400. This application requests an adjustment of the lot lines between tax lots 300 and 400 so that the proposed brew pub along with all its required parking will be located solely on tax lot 400. The existing manufacturing building will remain on tax lots 200 and the adjusted tax lot 300. Attached to this application are draft deeds which will convey the revised tax lots. Legal descriptions for each revised lot will be prepared and included on each deed's Exhibit A upon approval of this lot line adjustment by the city. Deeds will then be executed, notarized, and recorded. Also attached to this application is a draft reciprocal easement for joint use of existing driveways which currently serves all three tax lots. These driveways will continue to serve all three tax lots following the lot line adjustment. This easement will be executed, notarized, and recorded upon approval of this lot line adjustment by the city. FORM No.963-WARRANTY DEED-STATUTORY Fe diviaual Genntor). STEVENS-NESS LAW PtSUSNIND CO.PORTLAND.OR 1720. NA WARRANTY DEED—STATUTORY FORM INDIVIDUAL GRANTOR The Smets Family Trust I ,Grantor, conveys and warrants to The Smets Family Trust I , Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County,Oregon,to-wit: See Exhibit A (attached) -Revised Tax Lot 300 (IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT,CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) The property is free from encumbrances except The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 1.00 (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030) Dated this day of , .19 95 THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TIRE 10 THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. STATE OF OREGON, County of )ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 19 , by » John E. Smets, Co-trustee Marietta D. Smets, Co-trustee 14633 Ottaway Road NE GRANTOR Notary Public for Oregon Aurora OR 97002 My commission expires WARRANTY DEED John E. Smets, Co-trustee STATE OF OREGON, Marietta D. Smets, Co-trustee ss. 14633 Ottaway Road NE GRANTEE County of. Aurora, OR 97002 I certify that the within instru- GRANTEE'S ADDRESS.ZIP went was received for record on the After recording return to: __._... day of ,19 , Marietta D. Smets at .....o'clock M.,and recorded .».._....._........_._ SPACE RESERVED 14633 Ottaway Road NE............._,... in book/reel/volume No._________.. on _.._......._.............»». FOR Aurora, OR 9703L RECORDER'S USE page--....__...... or as fee/file/instru- ment/microfilm/reception No NAME.ADDRESS.ZIP Record of Deeds of said County. Witness my hand and seal of Until a change is requested, all tax statements County affixed. shall be sent to the following address: Marietta D. Smets 14633 Ottaway Road NE NAME TITLE Aurora, OR 97002 By Deputy NAME.ADDRESS.ZIP EXHIBIT A The following is a legal description of property described in that certain Warranty Deed dated ,1995 between The Smets Family Trust I, Grantor, and the The Smets Family Trust I, Grantee. Description: To be provided by surveyor. FOAMING.963-WARRANTY DEED-STATUTORY FC 'dlviduei 6nntor). srEVEN$a/fes tew•NSUSI4 RO CO..PORTtANO.OR gray. NA WARRANTY DEED—STATUTORY FORM INDIVIDUAL GRANTOR The Smets Family Trust I The Smets Family Trust I , Grantor, conveys and warrants to y. , Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County,Oregon, to-wit: See Exhibit A (attached) -Revised Tax Lot 400 (IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT,CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) The property is free from encumbrances except The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 1.00 (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030) Dared this day of , 19 95 THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE ID THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. STATE OF OREGON, County of........... ........ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 19 , by ._.. John E. Smets, Co-trustee Marietta D. Smets, Co-trustee 14633 Ottaway Road NE GRANTOR Notary Public for Oregon • Aurora OR 97002 My commission expires WARRANTY DEED John E. Smets, Co-trustee STATE OF OREGON, Marietta D. Smets, Co-trustee ss. 4633 County of._.............._-_.._�M._„_...-- ••1� ._.••.-..Ottaway Road NE _...»..._._.._ � � Aurora, OR 97002 I certify that the within instru- GRANTEE•9 ADDRESS.ZIP meat was received for record on the After recording return to: .-----„ day of 19 Marietta D. Smets at...__.___..o'clock.__...M.,and recorded •• «........._......».»..____ !PACE RElERVED 14633 Ottaway Road NE FOR in book/reel/volume No._______...... on _......_ ».».»....«..._..—..... Aurora, OR 9703 page._..______.._... or as fee/file/instru- RECORDER'S u![ ment/microfilm/reception No._.._.__._ NAME.ADDRESS.ZIP Record of Deeds of said County. Witness my hand and seal of Until a change is requested, all tax statements County affixed. shall be sent to the following address: ty • Marietta D. Smets 14633 Ottaway Road NE NAME TITLE Aurora, OR 97002 By ___.._ .....____... ... Deputy NAME.ADDRESS.ZIP EXHIBIT A The following is a legal description of property described in that certain Warranty Deed dated ,1995 between The Smets Family Trust I, Grantor, and the The Smets Family Trust I, Grantee. Description: To be provided by surveyor. RECIPROCAL EASEMENT For Automobile Driveway Adjoining Parcels THIS RECIPROCAL EASEMENT. Made and entered into this day of , 19 95 between The Smets Family Trust hereinafter called first party, and The Smets Family Trust hereinafter called second party, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the first party is the owner in fee simple of the following described real property in the County of Washington , State of Oregon , to-wit: Tax Lot 300 Map 2S1 12AD Tigard, Oregon and the second party is the owner in fee simple of the following described real property in that county and state, to-wit: Tax Lot 400 Map 2S1 12AD Tigard Oregon and the two parcels of real estate adjoin each other;and EASEMENT STATE OF OREGON, County of ss. BETWEEN I certify that the within instru- ment was received for record on the day of ,19........, at o'clock.....M.,and recorded SPACE RESERVED in book/reel/volume No on AND FOR page or as fee/file/instru- RECORDER'S USE ment/microfilm/reception No. Record of of said County. Witness my hand and seal of AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO County affixed. NAME TITLE By Deputy two WHEREAS, the parties desire to grant to each other an easement and right to use .es'certain automobile driveway snow or about to be constructed along and upon a portion of both parcels; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of each party's granting to the other an easement hereinafter described, and other valuable consideration each to the other in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged: FIRST: First party conveys to second party a perpetual easement for automobile driveway purposes, along and upon that portion of first parry's property described as follows, to-wit: per attached Site Plan, Exhibit A SECOND: Second party conveys to first party a perpetual easement for automobile driveway purposes, along and upon that portion of second party's property described as follows, to-wit: per attached Site Plan, Exhibit B THIRD: It is mutually agreed that each party may use in common with the other party, the whole automobile driveway, including that portion thereof situated on the property of the other party, for ingress and egress of auto- mobiles and uses incidental thereto. FOURTH: Maintenance and the cost of maintenance of all of the real estate described in this reciprocal easement damaged by natural disasters or other events for which all holders of an interest in the easement are blame- less shall be the responsibility of (check one): rAboth parties equally, share and share alike; ❑ both parties, with the first party being responsible for % and the second party being responsible for %. (If the last alternative is selected, the percentages allocated to each party should total 100.) FIFTH: During the existence of this easement, those holders of an interest in the easement that are responsible for damage to the easement because of negligence or abnormal use shall repair the damage at their sole expense. SIXTH: In construing this agreement, where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be made so that this agreement shall apply equally to individuals and to corporations. If the undersigned is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed and its seal, if any, affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by order of its board of directors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands in duplicate on this, the day and year first hereinabove written. The Smets Family Trust I The Smets Family Trust I John E. Smets, Co-trustee John E. Smets, Co-trustee Marietta D. Smets, Co-trustee Marietta D. Smets, Co-trustee STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. ) ss. County of ) County of ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on This instrument was acknowledged before me on ,19 ,by ,19 ,by as as of of Notary Public for Oregon - Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires My commission expires SE I/4NEI/4 SECTION 12 -I tS R I W W. M. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE' 1' = 100' SEE MAP ''' r. co 2S 1 I2AA xN °.* 60N I TA (CR. 636-4o W►DET. .,IT ,..............,......,... a i 6, T „4.1' 396' %I......._ in to b: \ .....f, -g P- E 1 ° 2c t •. TO PUBLIC 1013/923 100 1 /00, 81, 20 E : N A R R AT I V E — I`1CM E N AN I N S PUB The following narrative is submitted covering Sections of the Planning Code which apply the above reference project. SECTION 18-100 - LANDSCAPING. A. A portion of existing site vegetation has been incorporated into landscaping of the site. B. Landscaping is designed to enhance the building and develop a buffer around mechanical equipment. C. Irrigation system will be designed by the landscape contractor and submitted to the city for approval . SECTION 18-102 - VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS. A. Visual clearance will be maintained at entries and exits to the Site. Any existing trees or bushes will be cut back as necessary for proper visual clearances. SECTION 18-106 - OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS A. Off street parking - McMenamins Pub - exceeds requirements of the code. Based on the design criteria, 40 spaces are required - 41 spaces are furnished. All spaces to be 8' 8" x 18' 0" B. Off street parking - Smetco Building - exceeds requirements of the code. Based on the design criteria, 19 spaces are required - 31 spaces are furnished. Six spaces are compact and 25 spaces to be 8' 8" x 18' 0". C. Handicapped parking for the pub will be constructed including proper signage. D. Loading Zone is not required for this building. E. All new parking areas and driveways are to be paved. F. Bicycle parking to be installed at patio. SECTION 18-108 - ACCESS, EGRESS AND CIRCULATION A. Access and egress to the site will be maintained via driveway to access road - north side of property and driveway on west side of property with access directly to Sequoia Parkway. Existing access will be moved to the south approximately 10 feet as recommended for perpendicular access to Sequoia. B. Sidewalks will be installed connecting existing sidewalk to access walk to building. SECTION 18-114 - SIGNS A. Signs will be installed in accordance with Section 18-114, however will be submitted for approval by the Sign Contractor for approval prior to construction and installation. SECTION 18-116 - SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE STORAGE A. Solid waste and recyclable storage enclosure will be installed in accordance with the requirements of Pride Disposal Service. Mr. Lenny Hing was contacted and advised the architect that a 10 x 15 enclosure would be satisfactory. Plans will be submitted to Mr. Hing for approval . SECTION 18-120 - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A. Site analysis (existing conditions) has been included on the Site Development Plan. 1 . Existing site is substantially developed. a. Existing buildings. b. Existing concrete parking areas. c. Portion of existing landscaping. 2. Existing site is approximately dead level , therefore a contour plan is not necessary. B. Grading Plan. 1 . Proposed grading of existing level site is included on Site Development Plan. Grading to consist of development of drainage swales for storm water. C. Architectural Drawings. 1 . Included with submittal . D. Landscape Plan. 1 . Included with submittal . E. Sign Drawings. 1 . Drawings to be submitted by Sign Contractor. F. Site Lighting. 1 . Lighting will be installed over each exterior doorway. (Fixtures as selected by Owner) 2. Portion of Site lighting will be provided by Street Lighting. SECTION 18-164 - STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. Utilities are in place - no changes required to existing utilities. Contractor to tie into existing sanitary and storm sewer and water lines where shown. Natural gas is available to site. Underground electrical service is located adjacent to west driveway. CONFERENCE COMMENTS - A. Eating and Drinking Establishment to not exceed 20 percent of the area developed on the site. 1 . Total building area - 17,910 SF. 2. Area of eating and drinking - 1 ,692 SF. or approximately 9.5 percent of total development. SECTION 18-120-170 - EXCEPTION TO THE STANDARDS A. In accordance with this above reference section concerning change in setback requirements, we request the set back from Sequoia Parkway be changed from 20' to 16' . This request is based on the following. 1 . Reducing the front yard requirements allows for increasing the width of the drive - on the east side of the property. Since this drive is a major access thru the property, the additional width is necessary. B. The following criteria listed in the standards are met as follows: 1 . An exception is not greater than 20 percent. 2. There is no adverse effect on adjacent property. 3. Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and on- site. This proposed request will make the on-site access much safer. 4. A more efficient use of the site will result in this change. 5. The preservation of natural features will not be effected. Submitted by: HAMBLIN HATTAN ARCHITECTS PC M. Leon Hamblin President • A 18.120 .160 Sign Drawings A. Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 . (ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.120.170 Exceptions to Standards A. The Director may grant an exception to the setback yard requirements in the applicable zone based on findings that the approval will result in the following: 1. An exception which is not greater than 20 percent of the required setback; 2. No adverse effect to adjoining properties in terms of light, noise levels, and fire hazard; 3 . Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and on-site; 4. A more efficient use of the site which would result in more landscaping; and 5. The preservation of natural features which have been incorporated into the overall design of the project. B. The Director may grant an exception or deduction to the off-street parking dimensional and minimum number of space requirements in the applicable zoning district based on the following findings: 1. The application is for a use designed for a specific purpose which is intended to be permanent in nature (for example, senior citizen housing) and which has a demonstrated low demand for off-street parking; 2. There is an opportunity for shared parking and there is written evidence that the property owners have entered into a binding agreement to share parking; or 3 . There is community interest in the preservation of particular natural feature(s) on the site, public transportation is available to the site, and reducing the standards will not adversely affect adjoining uses, therefore the public interest is not adversely affected by the granting of the exception. C. The Director may grant an exception or deduction to the private outdoor area and shared outdoor recreation areas requirements, provided the application is for a use designed for a specific purpose which' is intended to be permanent in nature (for example, senior citizen housing) and which can demonstrate a reduced demand for a private outdoor recreational area based on any one or more of the following findings: • Revised 03/17/93 Page 308 15-ti5 Hallmark Drise Suite 150 Lake Oswego. OR 9'035 Phone(503)699-5010 Fax(503)699-5029 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Narrative for Lot Line Adjustment Smets Family Trust I Property Tigard, Oregon July 10, 1995 The Smets Family Trust I currently owns land totaling approximately 1.68 acres at the southeast corner of SW Bonita Road and Sequoia Parkway in Tigard. The property consists of three tax lots, 200, 300, and 400 on Map 2S1 12AD with areas of approximately .16, 1.38, and .14 acres respectively (see attached tax map). An existing single story manufacturing building of approximately 14,000 SF is located on tax lots 200 and 300. The owner has filed, concurrently with this lot line adjustment application, a development review application for a proposed brew pub to be constructed on what is now tax lots 300 and 400. This application requests an adjustment of the lot lines between tax lots 300 and 400 so that the proposed brew pub along with all its required parking will be located solely on tax lot 400. The existing manufacturing building will remain on tax lots 200 and the adjusted tax lot 300. Attached to this application are draft deeds which will convey the revised tax lots. Legal descriptions for each revised lot will be prepared and included on each deed's Exhibit A upon approval of this lot line adjustment by the city. Deeds will then be executed, notarized, and recorded. Also attached to this application is a draft reciprocal easement for joint use of existing driveways which currently serves all three tax lots. These driveways will continue to serve all three tax lots following the lot line adjustment. This easement will be executed, notarized, and recorded upon approval of this lot line adjustment by the city. S1 °44 . 11.)6t SE I/4NEL/4SECTION • 12 "I LS R I W W. M. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE' III= 100' SEE MAP 2S 112AA / a y' J N . °4.7BONITA (CR. 636-40 WIDE)T r _,,.,__, ~ T 396 ,—„, .„,,,,„,-„,„tT '\ O ,O I to I 1 \ ...1.--- At.t.r-----L-z7. I,, SIl gRid V.w `� �� q�> TO PUBLIC 1013/923 100 /00, ` It µB=•16 20 E . . 3.79 AC. c-lj' fir ) 401 100 A1 .6/AC. �. �, 200�'' II ➢� a ,a� 401-MI 300 ./6 AC i p V i 38 . 2 00-M I cr. -----2...\ N a. , U r 10 k--) A\A''a o f m c ' N.,_____ 40 0 • / pr, . "' co m 400 MI ,� 09 I\ 7 A , , .., 92' , 396' 72.50 ' =�- 100 v. 624.41 N 69.20'42.E i11 AC. 4 1200 S01 900 65 1 /1./4 AC. NARRATIVE — MCME N AM I N S PUB The following narrative is submitted covering Sections of the Planning Code which apply the above reference project. SECTION 18-100 - LANDSCAPING. A. A portion of existing site vegetation has been incorporated into landscaping of the site. B. Landscaping is designed to enhance the building and develop a buffer around mechanical equipment. C. Irrigation system will be designed by the landscape contractor and submitted to the city for approval . SECTION 18-102 - VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS. A. Visual clearance will be maintained at entries and exits to the Site. Any existing trees or bushes will be cut back as necessary for proper visual clearances. SECTION 18-106 - OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS A. Off street parking - McMenamins Pub - exceeds requirements ° of the code. Based on the design criteria, 40s;____Dages are 7s a required - 41 spaces are furnished. All spaces to be 8' 8" x 18' 0" � 7 B. Off street parking - Smetco Building - exceeds requirements r o.,,J - of the code. Based on the design criteria, 19 spaces are -- --7 required - 31 spaces are furnished. Six spaces are compact and 25 spaces to be 8' 8" x 18' 0". C. Handicapped parking for the pub will be constructed including proper signage. D. Loading Zone is not required for this building. E. All new parking areas and driveways are to be paved. F. Bicycle parking to be installed at patio. SECTION 18-108 - ACCESS, EGRESS AND CIRCULATION A. Access and egress to the site will be maintained via driveway to access road - north side of property and driveway on west side of property with access directly to Sequoia Parkway. Existing access will be moved to the south approximately 10 feet as recommended for perpendicular access to Sequoia. B. Sidewalks will be installed connecting existing sidewalk to access walk to building. SECTION 18-114 - SIGNS A. Signs will be installed in accordance with Section 18-114, however will be submitted for approval by the Sign Contractor for approval prior to construction and installation. SECTION 18-116 - SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE STORAGE A. Solid waste and recyclable storage enclosure will be installed in accordance with the requirements of Pride Disposal Service. Mr. Lenny Hing was contacted and advised the architect that a 10 x 15 enclosure would be satisfactory. Plans will be submitted to Mr. Hing for approval . SECTION 18-120 - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A. Site analysis (existing conditions) has been included on the Site Development Plan. 1 . Existing site is substantially developed. a. Existing buildings. b. Existing concrete parking areas. c. Portion of existing landscaping. 2. Existing site is approximately dead level , therefore a contour plan is not necessary. B. Grading Plan. 1 . Proposed grading of existing level site is included on Site Development Plan. Grading to consist of development of drainage swales for storm water. C. Architectural Drawings. 1 . Included with submittal . D. Landscape Plan. 1 . Included with submittal . E. Sign Drawings. 1 . Drawings to be submitted by Sign Contractor. F. Site Lighting. 1 . Lighting will be installed over each exterior doorway. (Fixtures as selected by Owner) 2. Portion of Site lighting will be provided by Street Lighting. SECTION 18-164 - STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. Utilities are in place - no changes required to existing utilities. Contractor to tie into existing sanitary and storm sewer and water lines where shown. Natural gas is available to site. Underground electrical service is located adjacent to west driveway. CONFERENCE COMMENTS - A. Eating and Drinking Establishment to not exceed 20 percent of the area developed on the site. a Y 1 . Total building area - 17,910 SF. 2. Area of eating and drinking =4-;,'692 SF. or approximately 9.5 percent of total development. USE D)1.101:1 3 SC:) "N1ANOF Foz ZESR ti 3(PC) 3� ar?0 4 1 sTio SECTION 18-120-170 - EXCEPTION TO THE STANDARDS A. In accordance with this above reference section concerning change in setback requirements, we request the set back from Sequoia Parkway be changed from 20' to 16' . This request is based on the following. 1 . Reducing the front yard requirements allows for increasing the width of the drive - on the east side of the property. Since this drive is a major access thru the property, the additional width is necessary. B. The following criteria listed in the standards are met as follows: 1 . An exception is not greater than 20 percent. 2. There is no adverse effect on adjacent property. 3. Safe vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and on- site. This proposed request will make the on-site access much safer. 4. A more efficient use of the site will result in this change. 5. The preservation of natural features will not be effected. Submitted by: HAMBLIN HATTAN ARCHITECTS PC M. Leon Hamblin President r 15455 Hallmark Drive Suite 150 lake Oswego. OR 9'035 - Phone(503)699-5010 Fax(503)699-5029 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY June 20, 1995 Mary Swintek CIT East Subcommittee 9915 SW Frewing, #23 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Smets/McMenamin's Development Review Dear Ms. Swintek: I represent the Smets Family Trust I, owners of the property located at 6830 SW Bonita Road in Tigard. We are considering proposing to build a McMenamin's Brew Pub at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners, residents, and other concerned citizens. You are invited to attend a meeting on: July 6, 1995 6830 SW Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon at 5:30 PM Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503) 699-5010 if you have any questions. Si cerely, -,\iiiY711),Z--- Jeffrey M. Sackett President cc: John and Man Smets Liz Newton, City of Tigard Community Involvement Coordinator • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON SS CITY OF TIGARD I, Jeffrey M. Sackett, being duly sworn, depose and say that on June 20, 1995, caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the enclosed list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 6830 SW Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in United State Post Office at Lake Grove, with postage prepaid thereon. /\l '' 'Jeffr' y r S`-c'et , President Triar?gle Development Company Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of . .u/t , ,19Q3 �vr�ry OFFICIAL MSEAL ` / NOTARY P MATTHEWS i�I f�lll�_� �►? NOTARY PUBLir - OREGON t� � ( � .CO COMMISSION NO. 029347 y ,1' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.3, IV Note • My .m - ion Expires: OP 3 ✓(/ 7 June 20, 1995 Recipient Address City, State Zip Code RE: Smets/McMenamin's Development Review Dear Sir or Madam: I represent the Smets Family Trust I, owners of the property located at 6830 SW Bonita Road in Tigard. We are considering proposing to build a McMenamin's Brew Pub at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners, residents, and other concerned citizens. You are invited to attend a meeting on: July 6, 1995 6830 SW Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon at 5:30 PM Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503) 699-5010 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jeffrey M. Sackett President cc: John and Mari Smets Liz Newton, City of Tigard Community Involvement Coordinator 9. . . . . • name company street city state zip Mr. Paul Pacific NW 14750 SW Tigard CR 97224- Gram Properties 72nd Ave 7963 Mr. Peter Pacific 15115 SW Portland CR 97224- Bechen Realty Sequuoia Pky 7154 Associates #20 0-W m Mr. Jim Spieker 5500 SW Portland OR 97201 Eddy Properties Macadam Ave Mr Burton 6600 SW Tigard OR 97224- Gevurtz Bonita Rd 8014 Mr. Rick 6600 SW Tigard CR 97224- - Lesniak Bonita Rd 8014 Mr. Walter Rogers 14600 SW Tigard Crs 97224- Novack Machinery 72nd Ave 7982 Co, Inc. Ms. Liz City of 13125 SW Tigard CR 97223 Newton Tigard Hall Blvd Mr. John E. 6830 SW Tigard CR 97224 Smets Bonita Rd Ms. Marietta 14633 Aurora CR 97002 D. Smets Ottaway Road, NE Mary 9915 SW Tigard CR 97223 Swintek Frewing #23 Mr. Craig 7430 SW Tigard CR 97223 Hopkins Varnes Mr. Mark F. 11310 SW Tigard CR 97223 Mahon 91st Court Mr. Joel 9660 SW Tigard CR 97223 Stevens Ventura court ,.Pat Wyden 8122 SW Tigard OR 97223 Spruce United Pipe PO Box Eugene CR 9740 2- and Supply 2220 0 0 6 8 Company, Inc. United Pipe 14830 SW Tigard CR 97224 and Supply 72nd Ave Company, Inc. Spieker 2180 Sand Menlo Park CA 9402 5- Properties Hill Rd 6935 #200 Home Depot 15115 SW Portland CR 97224- USA Sequoia Pky 7154 #200-Wm Obie Outdoor PO Box Eugene CR 9744 0- Advertising 1356 1356 6\ — 15455 Hallmark Drive l'-1A;77-11 .111"EwAt-i--- Suite 150 lake Oswego. OR 9-035 = RECEIVED PLANNING Phone(503)699-5010 Fax(503)699-5029 TRIANGLE AUG 14 1995 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY MEMORANDUM Date: July 7, 1995 To: File From: Jeff Sackett Re: McMenamin's Brew Pub / Site at SE Corner of Sequoia and Bonita Road Neighborhood Meeting per Design Review Submittal - Subject meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. on July 6, 1995 at the proposed project site. George Hughes, with DeLap, White and Raish CPA's, 4500 SW Kruse Way, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 was the only person attending the meeting in addition to myself. I reviewed the proposed site plan, floor plan, elevation, and building section with Mr. Hughes. Mr. Hughes' only comment was that he would like to see a nice water feature along Sequoia parkway similar to those further south in Pacific Corporate Center. I replied that the limited amount of land did not permit a "water feature" per se, but that we did plan two biofiltration swales similar to those at the Home Depot next door. These would be grass lined and would contain water during and after periods of rain. Mr. Hughes was generally pleased with the proposed brew pub and was eager for it to be completed. The meeting was adjourned at about 5:50 p.m. Name of applicant: Triangle Development Company Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot #: Map 2S1 12AD Tax Lots 300 & 400 Address or General Location: 6830 SW Bonita Road AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, Jeffrey M. Sackett, do affirm that I represent the party initiating interest in a proposed development review and lot line adjustment affecting the land located at 6830 SW Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon, and did on the 23rd day of June, 1995, personally cause to post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a development review and lot line adjustment application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at Bonita Road frontage facing north. This (?P\ day of July, 1995 //I.. Jeff ey . ` �ckett, President Tqa gle Development Company Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this . day of T ,19 •' OFFICIAL SEAL LYOLAM.WIGLEStivORTH Notary Publf TUB -O ���'/ NOCOMARY MISSION P LIC NO 015196 REGON My Commission Expires: s. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 5, 1996 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 2S112AA-00500 2S112AA-00600 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP SPIEKER PROPE• PO BOX 5909 PO BOX • ' _ PORTLAND OR 97228 PORTLAND OR 97228 2S112AD-00300 2S112AD-00400 SMETS, JOHN E TRUSTEE SMETS, JOHN E TRUST 6830 SW BONITA RD 6830 SW • !- " • 'i PORTLAND OR 97224 • zoosr OR 97224 2S112AD-00401 . . 2S112AD-00500 TIGARD, CITY OF ROGERS MACHINERY 6-1, 13125 SW HALL 14600 S. ' ' I AVENUE OR 97223 OR 97223 2S112AD-00501 2S112AD-00600 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PACIFIC NW PROPERTIES TRUSTEE INC 9950 SW ARCTIC DRIVE 14600 SW 72ND AVE BEAVERTON OR 97005 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112AD-00900 2S112AD-01100 HOME DEPOT USA, INC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P 5690 DTC BLVD SUITE 290 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200-WMI ENGLEWOOD CO 95125 PORTLAND OR 97224 2S112AD-00100 GEVURTZ, BURTON I TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. 6600 SW BONITA RD 15455 HALLMARK DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 SMETS FAMILY TRUST 14633 OTTAWAY ROAD, N.E. AURORA, OR 97002 SMETS/TRIANGLE DEV. - MCMENAMIN'S SDR 95-0015/MIS 95-0015 Ilo.00 +Q o'/ ° e 0,OP F1 Z w 08 / .'08 � y Aw IA 0 Z F- 0 ez " a FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSE. 50' t t�9°49 1� 479.T 30'EASEMENT 58�=5_'__`e 0 2 8 i . _J _. • aea.90 , 3 ONLY. DO NOT RELY ON FC. o ANY OTHER USE C n 1313.10' 660.20' 130' L 484.90 '� - S 89°49'W r S 89°49' W 30 I I /122.52' C R/'—/ 686 W 400 B.22 Ac. c 4.23 AC. I �� e I N I .f. '' ti) li o iQ CV rn N / I I{ M �Y-J� /l I I r/ Wt! o sp Q. ° N I 115+00 o $ i 498.40' / O — — — — —300 - -r h S 89° 49'W = N 89°46' 30"E e j m / ;� U U 500 0 (1 34 /tiv. I 0 W 50 I I W J J /// I I to Q W _ /'r� 2 4Ti ■■ ■ 1 / '1MO It U �1 / I Q I Fr/ I • Z �\ .r ° e �b9 a'y 3 I • I uiIzz.s2' �'' 1 9..� L *J / N 89°46'30"E 528.40' J L ! 1 s4-3o2o sECIN c�.s36 .ga Clt_s3s a (C R. 42 -40'WIDE) BON I TA SSWC. CR. 420-40'WIDE 4;7i:::9:474 iii/iiiiii::v.wmiii::i:ii9r/issr .:.4'//iiir.i:::iriiriiiiiiii/WC:, 'f, '.' I...zz s':;i,•„;:;:'.::;z9iiii;2 i:z;c:;7iiii9iiiiiiiiiii2;c9iiiiiriiiiii�ii.:z:7iiuiiiiiriiiiii::::;7Arr' ri..*4 *./... ) .1. / 7 ....... - �J 1�1 rA GARDENS 4 I SEE MAP A T I G A R D 2S 1 12A 2S I I2AA McMENAMINS PUB SEQUOIA PARKWAY AT BONITA ROAD TIGARD OREGON TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR SMETCO INC. July 1995 PREPARED BY TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP 3720 SW RIVER ROAD HILLSBORO OREGON (503) 796- 2138 ••••�'+c 1 x 4.4' #150 ) ✓UY2519� ti 04, TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION II EXISTING CONDITIONS III PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS IV SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC V SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION VI INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS VII. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS VIII. VEHICULAR QUEUEING ANALYSIS IX CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS X. APPENDIX Y y• A INTRODUCTION This analysis has been prepared at the request of the SmetCo Corporation to address traffic related impacts associated with development of a portion of their current 1.70 acre site located in Tigard, Oregon. The subject property is located immediately east of SW Sequoia Parkway, south of SW Bonita Road. The parcel has existing access to Sequoia Parkway and to an access road which connects Sequoia Parkway to the Gevurtz retail store located east of the SmetCo property adjacent to 1-5. The existing site supports a 14,280 s.f. industrial warehouse structure. The portion of the site proposed for development is currently unimproved, with various significant trees located west of the existing structure. The proposed development consists of a 3630 s.f. McMenamins Pub and Restaurant which would be located on the site adjacent to SW Sequoia Parkway. Access to the parking lot is proposed directly to Sequoia Parkway, approximately at the location of the existing curb cut and driveway apron. This access is located approximately 290' south of the Bonita Road intersection northbound stopline. Traffic flow is significant within the study area during both the morning and afternoon commute periods. Various intersection movements and neighboring intersections have been found to be critical during varying peak hours of operation. Since the proposed pub would operate from late morning through late evening, the critical review periods would include the lunch hour and the afternoon commute. A review of two-way traffic volumes in the area of the site indicates that traffic volumes during the noon to 1:00 pm period is approximately 80%to 90%of the volume occuring during the afternoon peak hour of commute traffic. McMenamin Pubs typically have their peak operation period after 5:00 pm. Thus, the combination of peak background traffic volumes and peak site development trip generation result in the determination of the critical design hour as the afternoon commute period. The following analysis addresses traffic related impacts of the proposed development during average weekday conditions during the afternoon peak hour of the commute. This study has been prepared in accordance with City of Tigard review standards and is intended to address impacts of the proposed facility as required by the City's Design Review process. . II. EXISTING CONDITIONS SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road are currently operating as 3-lane roadways, with continuously striped center turn lanes. The approach of Sequoia Parkway to Bonita Road is widened to provide adjacent left turn lanes for northbound and southbound movements. The southbound left turn refuge affords storage space for left turns into the access road leading to the SmetCo existing manufacturing building and to the Gevurtz retail store. All intersections in the site vicinity are unsignalized with the exception of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue with SW Bonita Road. Figure 1 illustrates the study area addressed in this analysis. Traffic turning movement counts were obtained in early July 1995 for use in evaluating intersection operation including intersection capacity and level of service and vehicular queueing impacts on proposed driveway placement. Figure 2 illustrates the results of the turning movement counts. The Appendix contains copies of two-way tube counts provided by Traffic Smithy for SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road. These counts were utilized in signal warrant analysis and in determination of the critical design hour. Currently, the intersection of 72nd Avenue and Bonita Road is operating over capacity during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. In the critical afternoon peak hour, westbound traffic on Bonita Road queues periodically beyond its intersection with Sequoia Parkway. This has created additional delays for turning movements from Sequoia Parkway, resulting in larger vehicle queues on Sequoia than would be expected without the downstream constraints. The intersection of Bonita Road and Sequoia Parkway was found to meet a peak hour signal warrant for 1995 existing traffic with the addition of projected traffic from the AmenSuites Hotel site. This intersection is not a good candidate for signalization however due to the close proximity to the 72nd Avenue traffic signal and due to the availability of alternate high capacity routes for northbound Sequoia Pkwy left turning traffic. These vehicles can turn left onto Cardinal Lane from Sequoia Parkway and right onto 72nd Avenue. All movements are high capacity and would allow bypassing of the congested and difficult left turn movement at the Bonita intersection. III. PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS The Pacific Corporate Center business park which borders the subject site on the south is nearing full buildout. The City of Tigard has identified the AmenSuites Hotel site as the only current "In-Progress" project in the vicinity which is not yet constructed, occupied, and generating traffic. A copy of the traffic impact letter submitted to the City of Tigard by Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated was obtained from City files for use in combining with existing 1995 traffic counts. Figure 3 reflects estimated trip generation volumes for the Hotel site. Figure 4 illustrates the combination of 1995 existing counts with Hotel generated traffic. Current traffic volumes were inflated with a 2% yearly growth rate to reflect approximate conditions in 1996 when occupancy of the McMenamins Pub is scheduled. It was noted that traffic counts taken by Traffic Smithy in 1994 for the intersection of 72nd Avenue and Bonita Road were higher than the recent July 1995 counts. Despite the reducing trend, the 2% growth rate has been utilized in this analysis. The City of Tigard has a planned and funded project, scheduled for construction during the summer and fall of 1995, to construct a southbound and an eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road. Traffic signal work will include modification of the current protected-only left turn phasing on all approaches to provide protective-permissive operation. This method of control allows left turning vehicles to accomplish turns through gaps in oncoming traffic, subject to the availability of adequate gaps. This improvement is expected to significantly improve overall intersection operation improving it from a level of service "E/F" to a level of service "C/D". IV. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Trip generation for the proposed 3630 s.f. McMenamins Pub has been based upon data published in the 5th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. A comparitive traffic count was undertaken by TCG at the McMenamins Pub located near the intersection of SW Murray Blvd. and SW Allen Blvd. to verify the accuracy and applicability of the ITE Manual. The Murray restaurant contains approximately 3000 s.f. of lease space. The subject site was found to generate 18 entering and 12 exiting vehicle trips during the 5:00-6:00 pm period. Since these observed volumes were found to be considerably less than predicted by the ITE Manual (45 vph), the Manual was used in order to maintain a conservative estimate of trip generating potential for the subject site. ITE Land Use Code 835(Drinking Place)was used to model trip generating potential. The average rate found in surveys of eight similar facilities was 15.5 vehicle trips per thousand s.f. of building space. This results in the following trip generation volumes: PM Peak Hour Entering 38 vph (30 new trips + 8 passby/diverted) Exiting 18 vph (14 new trips + 4 passby/diverted) Total 56 vph r _ V. SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trips generated by the subject development were assumed to distribute based upon existing market densities and existing directional traffic flows. This is reflective of surrounding work opportunities such as the Corporate Center located to the south and businesses located along the 72nd Avenue corridor. Passby-Diverted traffic is derived from the traffic which is currently passing by the site. These motorists are expected to divert from the prior trip route, such as work to home, to stop at the Pub. Clientele observed at the Murray/Allen Pub supported this trend. Most of the customers were attired as though arriving directly from work. Figure 5 presents"New Trip"assignments while Figure 6 illustrates the "Passby/Diverted"traffic turning movement volumes. VI. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Analysis of intersection capacity is based upon the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. The intersections addressed in this analysis include both signalized and unsignalized operation. Figure 7 illustrates the 1996 Combined Traffic volumes for the critical pm peak hour of operation. The intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road has been addressed assuming completion of the planned and funded improvements. These include right turn lanes on the north and west approaches and signal modifications to allow left turn traffic to turn either during protected signal phases or during gaps in oncoming traffic. The intersection of Bonita Road and Sequoia Parkway was calculated utilizing the Highway Capacity Manual methodology to determine level of service. The resulting level of service "F"does not reflect site observation of sidestreet queueing and delay. This is predominantly due to the platooned nature of both eastbound and westbound traffic on Bonita Road. The signal at 72nd creates tight "groups" of vehicles travelling through the Sequoia intersection while the traffic signals on Bangy Road east of 1-5 create similar westbound platoons of traffic. The queueing analysis in this report addresses the assessment made of actual service capacity on the Sequoia Parkway approach to Bonita Road. Calculations are included in the Appendix to support the findings. In general, the maximum northbound left/through queue observed on Sequoia at Bonita was 6 vehicles. The 6-vehicle queue occurred only twice during the two-hour afternoon count. These queues were observed to occur concurrent with Bonita Road queueing extending beyond the Sequoia intersection. To determine the actual service capacity, a back calculation was undertaken utilizing Poisson Single Channel Queueing Theory and the assumption that the 95th percentile queue consists of 7 vehicles. Since the arrival rate is known, solution for the actual service capacity could be accomplished. The "Reserve Capacity" used in the HCM for determination of level of service was calculated and found to indicate a level of service "E" operation. To model buildout conditions, a conservative assumption was made that the "actual service capacity"for the Sequoia Parkway approach will, upon completion of the planned improvements at 72nd/Bonita, be equal to that currently existing. The improvements will considerably improve westbound queueing which currently blocks left turn opportunities from Sequoia Parkway to Bonita westbound. The approach volume flow rate was increased consistent with background traffic growth and site development trip generation. The difference in flow rate, indicative of "Reserve Capacity", was found to maintain the level of service "E" operation. The following table summarizes the level of service and capacity results: TABLE 1 SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED LT RT LT V/C DELAY LOS MINOR MINOR MAJOR 1995 EXISTING TRAFFIC 72ND AVE at BONITA ROAD 0.82 27.6 D 72ND AVE at CARDINAL LANE D A A BONITA at SEQUOIA PKWY E A B SEQUOIA at GEVURTZ ACCESS B A A SEQUOIA at CARDINAL LANE C A A 1996 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC 72ND AVE at BONITA ROAD 0.82 27.6 D 72ND AVE at CARDINAL LANE D B A BONITA at SEQUOIA PKWY E A C SEQUOIA at GEVURTZ ACCESS C A A SEQUOIA at SITE ACCESS C A A SEQUOIA at CARDINAL LANE D A A VII. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS The evaluation of signal warrants is used as a criteria for the installation of traffic signals. In general, one or more signal warrants must be met before a traffic signal can be justified. The meeting of a signal warrant, however, only serves as an indicator that signalization should be considered as a potential improvement measure. Traffic signals are typically considered the final alternative in addressing capacity and/or safety issues. Other considerations should be evaluated in determining whether installation of a traffic signal is a prudent and necessary measure for protecting a particular intersection. The only currently unsignalized intersection within the study area which was found to be near meeting signal warrants is the Bonita and Sequoia intersection. It was determined that existing traffic volumes do not meet warrants at this intersection. The addition of one years background traffic growth, combined with projected Hotel traffic, would cause the signal to be warranted by a very small margin. 1996 Buildout traffic would increase the margin by which the peak hour signal warrant is met. Despite the meeting of this warrant, signalization is not recommended due to the proximity of the 72nd/Bonita traffic signal and the availability of northbound traffic to access 72nd Avenue via Cardinal Lane. Following is a summary of the signal warrant analysis: 1995 EXISTING CONDITIONS Warrant No. 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume No Warrant No. 2- Interruption of Continuous Traffic No Warrant No. 6-Accident Experience No Warrant No 9- Four Hour Volume No Warrant No. 11 - Peak Hour Volume No 1996 BASELINE CONDITIONS Warrant No. 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume No Warrant No. 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic No Warrant No. 6-Accident Experience No Warrant No 9- Four Hour Volume No Warrant No. 11 - Peak Hour Volume Yes (assumes left+thru+0.5rt) 1996 BUILDOUT CONDITIONS Warrant No. 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume No Warrant No. 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic No Warrant No. 6-Accident Experience No Warrant No 9- Four Hour Volume No Warrant No. 11 - Peak Hour Volume Yes(assumes left+thru+0.5rt) VIII. VEHICULAR QUEUEING ANALYSIS An analysis of vehicular queueing was undertaken to determine intersection operational information and criteria necessary for evaluating the proposed McMenamins driveway location. The proposed driveway location is approximately 290' from the Bonita northbound stopline. Calculations are included in the Appendix which include narrative explanation of the process and assumptions involved. In general, the Highway Capacity Manual was found to inaccurately model intersection capacity and approach movement capacity due to the platooning characteristics of the Bonita Road traffic. To determine the Sequoia Parkway northbound left/through service capacity, a back calculation was performed utilizing the Poisson Single Channel Queueing Theory to determine the level of service capacity which would result in a 95th percentile queue of 7 vehicles. During the two hours of afternoon peak period operation, two queues extending to 6 vehicles were noted. This analysis has conservatively assumed that 7 vehicles would be a safely conservative approximation for the 95th percentile queue. This exercise was used to evaluate the actual service capacity, reserve capacity, and level of service for the intersection. Modelling of northbound left/through queueing extents upon buildout of the Pub was accomplished by assuming that the service capacity of the lane group would remain constant in spite of completion of the City's improvements and 72nd/Bonita. Since peak queues of 5 and 6 vehicles were observed only to occur concurrent with Bonita Road queueing which extended beyond Sequoia Parkway, reduction in Bonita queueing should also reduce, to some extent, the queueing on Sequoia. To estimate the buildout left/through queueing requirements, the service rate calculated for existing conditions was conservatively assumed to be maintained. Combined with the increase of traffic generated by background growth and the subject site, a resultant buildout 95th percentile queue of 9 vehicles was calculated. This would require a queueing distance of 225'which is considerably less than the 290' proposed in the plans. The Appendix contains a detailed description of the process and assumptions involved in this analysis. IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed 3630 s.f. McMenamins Pub can be reasonably accommodated by the surrounding roadway system. This analysis has determined that a level of service "E"is in effect at the intersection of Sequoia Parkway and Bonita Road with alternate routes available which provide levels of service of"C"or better. Signal warrants are marginally - met, but signalization is not recommended due to the proximity of the 72nd Avenue signal and due to the availability of alternate high capacity routes. The proposed driveway location of approximately 290' south of the Bonita Road northbound stopline was found to be satisfactory. Projected 95th percentile queueing was found to extend 225. A large percentage (estimated in an earlier MEI study as nearly 40%) of the Sequoia Parkway traffic approaching Bonita Road is"cut-through"traffic. It is recommended that the City consider in the future the installation of a 4-way stop control at the intersection of Sequoia Parkway and Cardinal Lane with directional signage to encourage use of Cardinal Lane to access 72nd Avenue to travel north of Bonita or west on Bonita. Without the 4-way stop, motorists will be less likely to decelerate and turn towards 72nd Avenue. Future added queueing on Sequoia Parkway would be predominantly the result of additional cut-through traffic as the Pacific Corporate Center is near buildout. All other intersections within the study area were found to operate at acceptable levels of service ("D"or better)with the exception of the level of service "E"operation at Bonita/Sequoia. The currently proposed site plan has been reviewed to address onsite vehicular and pedestrian accessibility, as well as to evaluate the potential for offsite impacts. Inbound traffic volumes should operate acceptably without impacting Sequoia Parkway traffic. It has been recommended that the new driveway approach to Sequoia Parkway be widened to provide for two egress lanes at the street approach. The approach should transition back to one egress lane adjacent to the parking spaces in order to optimize traffic flow. This will allow left and right turning vehicles to stage simultaneously to await gaps in Sequoia Parkway traffic. The availability of the left turn lane may aid in routing some motorists during peak hour conditions to avoid the left turn onto Bonita and instead travel south to Cardinal Lane for access to SW 72nd Avenue. To facilitate the widening of the driveway, a minor skewing of the approach may be necessary. Though a perpendicular approach is preferable, a skew angle of up to 15 degrees could be considered. A cursory review of onsite pedestrian circulation indicates that sidewalk and front door placement are generally adequate. It has been recommended that the sidewalk connection from the street to the front door be as direct as possible to provide optimal access for patrons walking to the pub from surrounding businesses. Access to the existing warehouse use can continue to operate relying upon direct connection to the shared driveway with the Gevurtz facility. X. APPENDIX c9 2 01 U-5 ot� 4r 0 0--ii ;= zri / > F N ae e' o4 I. VI /\ N goo 3 l!1 SYJ WALNUT ST. viy N /S2. � ..g- X% ll 411.--.s._ 44. SW GMRDE ST '11-USE- WAY SW. N1 c Do N A LD ST. SW BONITA RD. O -.3 1>'' T--- #. co Zi 2 —tn4 c,f'N a 3 3 vi 0., 4 v, FIGURE 1 SMETS PROPERTY — McMENAMINS PUB SITE Date JULY 1 995 VICINITY MAP Job No. 4500 Page OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP m m N n c 1 ,_ z 211 1 C._ 14 •57--- ..--454 1 f'. 4 Ile- , I �r 112 O 1N 0 2N r) N S&N/TA RD, • NNA', ii nc • in.+»�»>iiil �-"1 � o2 PRo,1eCT . 395 fi�-91do eel NS—.Ill.--S2 M SITE ,® r 1 ._ l r..... GEVURTZ. Lo LAI .,'.1/4,- 0 � r H6ME 9 M DEPoT 1 I 23 h t S441. CARDINAL LANE • \— 4,, Chy.o lu �N � Y Q 27-- •--34 4. FICE �5 27 < PHPeT r ON W SANK 1 L 3 U') In 3 Vi NORTH F? ORb 2. SMETS PROPERTY— McMENAMINS PUB SITE Date JUL1 1995 1995 EXISTING TQ4EFrC_ Job No. 95002 Pt-1 PE/W._ HOUR Page OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP r-- 1 � -1 I O '' O " &NITA RD. • ry — I _3 •.l,,.,O t J 1 PRoecr I l t SITE 0 _w I ''' 1 I ' ' GEYVRTZ i ~ 3i„,,1 E 1.10016 i '- 1 ,0 DEPOT Ili I ( SS.W. CARDINAL LANE h _0 - .� • r- 115 --1 1 1-- 4 FICE z d r�'0'I' N � � ( C IA ` N 0 ' P�AE NTK W CO N t N NORTH FIORE 3 SMETS PROPERTY — McMENAMINS PUB SITE Date JULY 1 995 IN -PROCESS TRAFFIC Job No. 95002 PM PEAK NO OR Page OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP • r '4"Ll 0- * 1i.• 4 24, la • .4--7193 c?O .I I �ON/� 0 N,�V „� `640 RD, Y 9� t� � I `�53 zt- Gi 0. f t1. 0//1 / t t/0I C If' GE.7 M^Q 4-�23 AEPoT CARD/ LANE. o ri clt V 1/ i yt 3 1© ,�N j AEf'�T al C3 ilicZCo . s vis E \ F VoRny sMEr s PRoP Rl9 I S `�oMNgM� s Pvfii U RE ¢� e strE/NE- T Pty q Date__JULY 9 g,C n� ,h4 U /-7 C s Job No 2' kArs 55a02 PORTAT ' Page ` O1 N CONS UL T INQ GRO Up 25 NI / (.,.. 2o __f r y 0 j r 6--..„1 .3 I fr„� 3 Dcr I � 01 1 j,` 9 ii- 5 TZ ow u /r:2 © GEyvR � b T �N '4C 'ANe. 4 44 la,.1/ 4 1. � r Q L© tr) j G CT t3 tu fi � ,psq�/qC Z0% (6 ii /5% sMETt NOR TS PR©PERr ,, `� / T 1P aSS,G —McMENgMtN FI NMI S PUS StrE (�R� S T l�s bate Jul AN,, 7 19 5 P°R�,�Tro Job"0 95002 N CwATSur Page\Op TrNG GIRO tip .4- 1 �,... ) 1 k` I I— ~I I jr I • N O N 130N 17A RD. • 1 � ` 0)PgoJecr r - -.4- • SITE Q I 4 , ern', GEVVRTZ. ,� .E`1,°;1. H DEPOT 1 ._. VI) I 1 ( SW CARDINAL LANE H .0 � N • Q2 �1 1 1._ FILE Q DEPOT N -) 1 ( ;(5 A : z N e SANK 1 1. w v' in 3 vi iT NORTH 8 YPHEK 9 VpH D(!T FIGURE Co SMETS PROPERTY— McMENAMINS PUB SITE Date JUL7 1995 TRIP ASSIGNMENT Job No. 95)02 PASS -13Y 4 DIVE TAP *- Page OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP DK EST:HATED CUNSE12v14TIVe1,Y AS 2o7 of To7AL pG—W- A-3 duct TR IF GEN ERA-11 D N ■ Acf- i MI 1 `--- z. .., i.2-_-_,'51 I I 4 1 5 -• I r l2q o �m ,O N O AN B0N/TA RD. • • M.O / i rio Ve 1 ..,--. !/I//!//!!I///I —4n �, PROJECT il7�1 1 4"'53 '1K)1 • SITE 0 a 1 13 1 // " GEYURTZ L ' M 0 N in HaME I la--1� `�i _ DEPoT VI 1 1 1-25 SW CARDINAL LANE H•,c) Ne-4 ../0 _ Nzio , N N. Q36-) 1 1--34 4 F10E Q �� .--� < DEt'oT z Ni 1' 0 A , _'0 ^" � � - SANK ENT�N 1 l , NT- W N vi 3 vi NORTH Ft6oRE7 SMETS PROPERTY — McMENAMINS PUB SITE Date JULY 1995 11% Cef`11311JED TRAfFIG Job No. 95002 PM PEA1< HOUR Page OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP M i 1 c 2 -� &.. J4 457 -4 -_ 1-54 1/8 ` . Vl Sr- Z 1._I.,-:r-, �f 2 Obse ,.mac te .6 veil () 3�;-1t Semi-p[ -}raYtad Pfow 2 N N 41 RIU&L j Wl u�ilhk 1E 2 _ N SifEvre CAP. RAT-Elk: C,3 vein/ht. 6y 1491i A.adysis ,t /41 _ o6 se+-iced Capa.c. > 141 treL/l,►- `b r �, = 03 - 0 3 - 2.24 p I ajo c 4 cat , r Pa i Ssay,s p(0),. _ -1,24 Quet}etn, T uri 1/ r etu i_ e uadvx�' ,, not correck • C-4LCULATE Act() L SEPU ICE CA4PAGI TY 8A5eD VPek OSSE-12uE-O 62ofoe pr2e UE C'Y : 44 ute.H Z TitriFS OBSE U PcTI0t8I P€T I O 7 Z Nes. vein 1 Times WE: Sue &ANTRA(- 6LvEO 5 SKOI IAI -I- pCGu22Eo LJR 1 f3OUT1 vein 2 TMES �ueuei p SFst)b IA , ,}S3On tE Cr, UCH_ &UeoE E&ucttS 9Sf P&P-GENTILE QuEoE 1 MEAN IN6 0N IN TWE- I TY 610E0ES OJOOLD EGtUkC Cr, v&-Ft ici_eS. 77'lkT6 AcTUAL SERVICE LAPP-CITY BY TTZJAL Firl D &QOR (AFTER VA21ouS ATTet-'1 PTS 270 ueIn Wits -rout4D To YIELDGr.00Q - 5). P(n) sn) RIUfL 2-A7E 7 - 141 UE=H/Fl2 ko)_ x', 344 C,3' 4 S 12UIcE kATE 215 UEH K2 570 ID � = P(,�)_ �o.�s�� (,344 ) ��z� o, = 1417215 = o.&ScO P(2)=(d,65 6)2(0,344) 0, 148 0,7/5 p(o)= 1 - yo = O 344 P(3)=(0,65 )3(bi344) 0-097 0-815 P011= D-o64 6,375 PLs )= 6,642 C,72-/ P(6,)-= 6,02-7 6,148 Th.e retire ; cc a/ ,-v k c cae etasty aferox 2_15 uo-VN,� Re_S&g_ve CAP= T1 S- 141 = 74 Los it " SMETS PROPERTY -- McMENAMINS PUB SITE Date I IL( 95 19, `1S EXISTuv6 pm F1 Job No. 9�L £ U&UE1 N b ANALYSIS Page 1 OF 2- TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP U PT/THku. prz_o JECTeo DPPos/'Jo UO LONE is f293 uP/-/} AN I J c2Etss Or-- 4% -f_ M T!-(E 1237 IN 1`195 W ITV KoTEL DccUPAAJ cY, The 1985 F-1 CAMAC 7Y NtM/VAC- WD1 (A7ES i C L)6D I t l O/ JC-E w I U_ OE-.C2(S E SERU!Cc_A Pe{ fr By A PP2oxi A-TtLY l5 h , Si NCE T2vci< % is APP2oX- Zol/. P Tb v A, . THUS A 15 u(L RC-Doc-no,' ��� � Is fMP2r�x . �� P In.) CAP A-C rry wiSUL D 2ES OLT, Mir Is I- THAN torfS6T SIG 011 c A T ( E 3 U c_710tJ IN w�7i3a uND BD N 174 RD, � &oe0ei NG cfioscp g Y 72J.10 , 7`HIS�7 6eiAJ( ( SIGH 1 The &0eUE1k6 (UI bU l c_DovT Rc±c c7S The N C D LTIni W-1 C07JSe42-`)A TIUEtL'1 f SUM TI-t6 P(L1d L of St 1c6 csPAc ITy. P6.) P(`h) fei c L P.A-rc v�� P(o) 642-5 0,251 SERuIcE C.AVACIT , ^ 215vpC1 pti) _ (U,74)1 (0,2S1) , I88 01439 = 169172i5 = 0,711 (2(2) =(o,71 V- (o,25)) o, MI 0,58o rc3) 0,10 0,68 ' CO ) 0,071 0,76;5 c(5) 0,059 6,324 P(6) 0.0114 0,8bg ('C7) 6,033 6• 701 ('(8) U,025 Q,92r'o L_RC&D: x 25 r=225 --- f O) D I Oil O,ci115 LpQ> = 29o' P((o) 0 , 014 0(159 E UE CAP. = 215-1(o I = 54 vpl, LDS "E" SMETS PROPERTY — McMENAMINS PUB SITE Date J U Ly '15 1 116 BUit_DoOT Prl PEAK Job No. I55OOZ QUEUEING A;9•iAc(—yS IS Page 2. OF 2- TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP Transportation Engineering &Planning 503/796-2138 3720 S.W. River Road Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 ! 95 EXIST/1.16 CoNDiTionix t 7s Hi k Ply < 4% o PM Pk H' Hi)k Ff,- 721% o F PN1 Peak, H� /vl 141 Lr/nw x0,64 = 90 Zoe �d 251 Ix/riod al x0,64= 127 < Zoo - W itrrekA"- 1\1 o.2 I tA.4evrkir fi?M of ctryo'ruraris 7rJf inticri- 79Z < 900 m,,2rn- 90 < /op No No N o 127 --1- No_{O " Ate' C y e/A- "`csz N.D Wadvv LAA.4-- I•l o. 9 Fo u•- How Vold es Maim. 1237 x 0,724 = 89(0 pl mv 1 1-1 x 0.724 = /02_ Kr No Z54 x Oa VI- = 1 ' 4 No ()Oa.te-r + No, I I : P> IC. Hw.- \1a lues Ivloit\- 12 37 1 rn i kusv 14) "D Na 254 - <275 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING GROUP Transportation Engineering &Planning 503/796-2138 3720 S.W. River Road Isboro, Oregon 97123 "m;--2- 9Co Co rr)i3inJ EO BV LDOU7 SI N A L Ts : 8TH H Hr, (o4% o(- Prl Peo,t,. 4 TN 1-4■311 Nom. 72.1% AC PH Pea k N1v. t3o 'yrj" Jl7i ): r' I►1irvtUw, Ue(i`ci/ItL✓ 1/oIcNP'Q 1'Yl exlov 1 Z`13 x 0,61- S 28 nor b x 044 103 - I No (z T/m ier) 7 O X 0.(041- 1-1/ iNo Ho L )a + No. 1 K +-+-eft a�' b y ays T J4 c 82,8 ---� 'yVl iPurv" l OS No N O 17 i r�o _1- 1,thv,,YWv,,-4~t\lo, ( / Cc-+d,P, Eximivu2Ab2 No kb , 9 -ov - Woii ' Va 1 irw,es 123 ' 04 9360� --, /YMints,/ 1(0/ ) 7 = 117 fvo 2 gd x 0,724 203 lose No R)a_kv-c iNi I\10.1) Peak How Vo1owits v'Th )29 1 Z80 �5o YE-5 C l-{ECG V3/5 S t..:I. U)ci v, L4A1 N o. I I Y 1 J 2L93 �� YES YE-3 1'Y1 i k ov 2_6 4 airK 4 J 147 No HCS : Signalized Intersection Version 2 . 3 08-01-1995 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Well Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 (904) 392 -0378 Streets : (E-W) BONITA ROAD (N-S) 72ND AVENUE Analyst : DPO / TCG File Name: Area Type : Other 8-1-95 PM PEAK Comment : EXISTING 1995 TRAFFIC W/ PROT/PERM SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Traffic and Roadway Conditions Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - --- - - - - --- - - --- - --- - - -- - - - - --- - - -- - ---- ---- ---- No . Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 < 1 1 < 1 1 1 Volumes 88 395 115 52 466 62 260 378 82 175 317 241 PHF or PK15 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 Lane Width 12 . 0 12 . 0 14 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 14 . 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 3 1 5 6 1 4 3 5 4 1 5 3 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Peds 20 20 20 20 Ped Button (Y/N) Y 18 . 0 s (Y/N) Y 18 . 0 s (Y/N) Y 18 . 0 s (Y/N) Y 20 . 0 Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 23 0 0 48 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * WB Left * * SB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8 . OA 37 . OA Green 16 . OA 33 . OA Yellow/A-R 4 . 0 4 . 0 Yellow/A- 4 . 0 4 . 0 Lost Time 3 . 0 3 . 0 Lost Time 3 . 0 3 . 0 Cycle Length: 110 . 0 secsPhase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 HCS : Signalized Intersection Version 2 . 3 08-01-1995 2 Streets : (E-W) BONITA ROAD (N-S) 72ND AVENUE Analyst : DPO / TCG File Name : Area Type : Other 8-1-95 PM PEAK Comment : EXISTING 1995 TRAFFIC W/ PROT/PERM SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Volume Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT - - - - -- -- - -- - ---- -- -- - - - - -- ---- EB Left 88 0 . 89 99 L 99 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 99 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 395 0 . 89 444 T 444 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 444 0 . 00 0 . 00 Right 115 0 . 89 103 R 103 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 103 0 . 00 1 . 00 WB Left 52 0 . 89 58 L 58 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 58 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 466 0 . 89 524 TR 594 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 594 0 . 00 0 . 12 Right 62 0 . 89 70 NB Left 260 0 . 89 292 L 292 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 292 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 378 0 . 89 425 TR 517 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 517 0 . 00 0 . 18 Right 82 0 . 89 92 SB Left 175 0 . 89 197 L 197 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 197 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 317 0 . 89 356 T 356 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 356 0 . 00 0 . 00 Right 241 0 . 89 217 R 217 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 217 0 . 00 1 . 00 Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ideal Adj Direction Sat No. f f f f f f f f Sat /LnGrp Flow Lns W HV G p BB A RT LT Flow EB L 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1787 T 1900 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1890 R 1900 1 1 . 07 0 . 98 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 84 1 . 00 1666 WB L 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 97 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1751 TR 1900 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 98 1 . 00 1854 NB L 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1778 TR 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 98 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 97 1 . 00 1799 SB L 1900 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1796 T 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 98 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1852 R 1900 1 1 . 07 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 84 1 . 00 1683 HCS : Signalized Intersection Version 2 . 3 08-01-1995 3 Streets : (E-W) BONITA ROAD (N-S) 72ND AVENUE Analyst : DPO / TCG File Name : Area Type : Other 8-1-95 PM PEAK Comment : EXISTING 1995 TRAFFIC W/ PROT/PERM SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group Direction Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c /LnGrp (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio EB Lperm. 31 Lprot . 68 1787 0 . 038 0 . 082 146 0 .465 * T 444 1890 0 . 235 0 . 345 653 0 . 680 R 103 1666 0 . 062 0 .345 576 0 . 179 WB Lperm. 18 Lprot . 40 1751 0 . 023 0 . 082 143 0 . 279 TR 594 1854 0 . 320 0 . 345 640 0 . 927 * NB Lperm. 56 Lprot . 236 1778 0 . 133 0 . 155 275 0 . 859 * TR 517 1799 0 . 287 0 . 309 556 0 . 930 * SB Lperm. 38 Lprot . 159 1796 0 . 089 0 . 155 278 0 . 573 T 356 1852 0 . 192 0 . 309 572 0 . 622 R 217 1683 0 . 129 0 . 309 520 0 . 417 Sum (v/s) critical = 0 . 779 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6 . 0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 . 823 Level of Service Worksheet Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS Direction v/c g/C Group d d Prog Grp Grp By By /LnGrp Ratio Ratio Cap 1 2 Fact Delay LOS App App EB L 0 .47 0 .455 146 15 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 00 17 . 5 C 20 . 1 C T 0 . 68 0 . 345 653 23 .4 2 . 0 0 . 85 21 . 6 C R 0 . 18 0 . 345 576 19 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 85 16 .2 C WB L 0 . 28 0 . 455 143 14 . 2 0 . 3 1 . 00 14 . 5 B 32 . 8 D TR 0 . 93 0 . 345 640 26 . 4 14 . 3 0 . 85 34 .5 D NB L 0 . 86 0 .491 275 18 . 7 15 . 7 1 . 00 34 . 5 D 36 . 4 D TR 0 . 93 0 . 309 556 28 . 0 16 . 1 0 . 85 37 . 5 D SB L 0 . 57 0 . 491 278 15 . 1 2 . 1 1 . 00 17 . 2 C 20 . 3 C T 0 . 62 0 . 309 572 24 . 7 1 . 5 0 . 85 22 . 3 C R 0 .42 0 . 309 520 22 . 9 0 . 3 0 . 85 19 . 7 C Intersection Delay = 27 . 6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D HCS : Signalized Intersection Version 2 . 3 08-02-1995 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 (904) 392-0378 Streets : (E-W) BONITA ROAD (N-S) 72ND AVENUE Analyst : DPO / TCG File Name : 95002ACP.HC9 Area Type : Other 8-1-95 PM PEAK Comment : 1996 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC W/ PROT/PERM SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Traffic and Roadway Conditions Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No . Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 < 1 1 < 1 1 1 Volumes 90 411 119 53 480 72 265 386 84 190 326 246 PHF or PK15 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 0 . 89 Lane Width 12 . 0 12 . 0 14 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 14 . 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 Heavy Veh 3 1 5 6 1 4 3 5 4 1 5 3 Parking (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0 0 0 0 Con. Peds 20 20 20 20 Ped Button (Y/N) Y 18 . 0 s (Y/N) Y 18 . 0 s (Y/N) Y 18 . 0 s (Y/N) Y 20 . 0 Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 RTOR Vols 23 0 0 48 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * WB Left * * SB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 7 . OA 37 . 5A Green 16 . OA 33 . 5A Yellow/A-R 4 . 0 4 . 0 Yellow/A- 4 . 0 4 . 0 Lost Time 3 . 0 3 . 0 Lost Time 3 . 0 3 . 0 Cycle Length: 110 . 0 secsPhase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 HCS : Signalized Intersection Version 2 . 3 08-02-1995 2 Streets : (E-W) BONITA ROAD (N-S) 72ND AVENUE Analyst : DPO / TCG File Name : 95002ACP .HC9 Area Type : Other 8-1-95 PM PEAK Comment : 1996 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC W/ PROT/PERM SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Volume Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT - -- - - - - - ---- ---- - - -- -- ---- --- - EB Left 90 0 . 89 101 L 101 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 101 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 411 0 . 89 462 T 462 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 462 0 . 00 0 . 00 Right 119 0 . 89 108 R 108 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 108 0 . 00 1 . 00 WB Left 53 0 . 89 60 L 60 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 60 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 480 0 . 89 539 TR 620 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 620 0 . 00 0 . 13 Right 72 0 . 89 81 NB Left 265 0 . 89 298 L 298 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 298 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 386 0 . 89 434 TR 528 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 528 0 . 00 0 . 18 Right 84 0 . 89 94 SB Left 190 0 . 89 213 L 213 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 213 1 . 00 0 . 00 Thru 326 0 . 89 366 T 366 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 366 0 . 00 0 . 00 Right 246 0 . 89 222 R 222 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 222 0 . 00 1 . 00 Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ideal Adj Direction Sat No. f f f f f f f f Sat /LnGrp Flow Lns W HV G p BB A RT LT Flow EB L 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1787 T 1900 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1890 R 1900 1 1 . 07 0 . 98 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 84 1 . 00 1666 WB L 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 97 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1751 TR 1900 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1 . 00 0 . 98 1 . 00 1851 NB L 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1778 TR 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 98 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 97 1 . 00 1799 SB L 1900 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1796 T 1900 1 1 . 00 0 . 98 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1852 R 1900 1 1 . 07 0 . 99 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 84 1 . 00 1683 HCS : Signalized Intersection Version 2 . 3 08-02-1995 3 Streets : (E-W) BONITA ROAD (N-S) 72ND AVENUE Analyst : DPO / TCG File Name : 95002ACP .HC9 Area Type : Other 8-1-95 PM PEAK Comment : 1996 BUILDOUT TRAFFIC W/ PROT/PERM SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group Direction Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c /LnGrp (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio EB Lperm. 34 Lprot . 67 1787 0 . 037 0 . 073 130 0 . 516 * T 462 1890 0 . 244 0 . 350 662 0 . 698 R 108 1666 0 . 065 0 . 350 583 0 . 185 WB Lperm. 20 Lprot . 40 1751 0 . 023 0 . 073 127 0 . 314 TR 620 1851 0 . 335 0 . 350 648 0 . 957 * NB Lperm. 57 Lprot . 241 1778 0 . 136 0 . 155 275 0 . 877 * TR 528 1799 0 . 293 0 . 314 564 0 . 936 * SB Lperm. 41 Lprot . 172 1796 0 . 096 0 . 155 278 0 . 620 T 366 1852 0 . 198 0 . 314 581 0 . 630 R 222 1683 0 . 132 0 . 314 528 0 .421 Sum (v/s) critical = 0 . 801 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6 . 0 sec Critical v/c (x) = 0 . 848 Level of Service Worksheet Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS Direction v/c g/C Group d d Prog Grp Grp By By /LnGrp Ratio Ratio Cap 1 2 Fact Delay LOS App App EB L 0 . 52 0 . 450 130 16 . 5 2 . 8 1 . 00 19 . 3 C 20 . 5 C T 0 . 70 0 . 350 662 23 .4 2 . 3 0 . 85 21 . 8 C R 0 . 19 0 . 350 583 18 . 9 0 . 0 0 . 85 16 . 1 C WB L 0 . 31 0 .450 127 14 . 7 0 . 5 1 . 00 15 . 2 C 36 . 2 D TR 0 . 96 0 . 350 648 26 . 6 18 . 5 0 . 85 38 . 3 D NB L 0 . 88 0 . 495 275 18 . 8 17 . 9 1 . 00 36 . 7 D 37 . 5 D TR 0 . 94 0 . 314 564 27 . 9 16 . 8 0 . 85 38 . 0 D SB L 0 . 62 0 . 495 278 15 . 4 2 . 9 1 . 00 18 . 3 C 20 .4 C T 0 . 63 0 . 314 581 24 . 5 1 . 6 0 . 85 22 . 2 C R 0 .42 0 . 314 528 22 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 85 19 . 6 C Intersection Delay = 28 . 8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET 72ND AVE. NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK HR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING 1995 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB -- - - --- - - --- - - - - LEFT -- 23 0 29 THRU -- 0 550 456 RIGHT -- 99 16 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES -- 2 1 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENT NT EASTBOD GRADE RIGHT TURN N WESTBOUND T OURS I NORTHBOUND p 0p _ 12 RIGHT TURNSJ ACCE ` _ _ _-_ _ _ _ _ _ -2 SOUTHBOUND 0' 0a 9p FOR LR TON LANE g p 30 TURNS VEHICLE COMPOSITION 0, p0 9 � _ _: ��__, SITION 0 20 N o SU _ 20 N EASTBOUND \ AND TRUCKS N RV�S o COM B WESTBOUND `\ VEHICLES ION ,`````` 0 NORTHBOUND 1 s MOTORCYCLES Sp ,xBO�D 2 `-` ES 1 CRITICAL GAPS 2 4 0 4 1 TABULAR - 1 MINOR RIGHTS (Table VALUES - ` T S l p'2I ADJUS TED MAJOR LEFTS WB 5 VALUE SIGHT D \ _''___ MINOR SB s. 70 _ENT CRITICAL LEFTS 5, l0 0. Op I L GAP q,B 5 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 6 80 1p p 5 ,0 NAME - _ 00 OP DATE OF T THE EAST/WEST 6. 80 5. 20 TE HE NORTH/SOUTH'� -,__ p OTHER'S TIME O STREET T_ _ 00 THE ANALYSIS TREET CA - 6. 80 Ex NG 08 ED `4VE. -- -- - - -------- - -- --- --- - 1995 02 1995 PM PEAK HR CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 26 163 158 158 132 D RIGHT 112 513 513 513 401 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 34 596 596 596 563 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET72ND AVE . DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING 1995 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET 72ND AVE . NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK HR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE : T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- LEFT - - 29 0 32 THRU - - 0 560 468 RIGHT -- 101 27 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES - - 2 1 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -- - - WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 30 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND - - - -- -- - WESTBOUND 1 1 0 NORTHBOUND 2 4 1 SOUTHBOUND 2 4 1 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 . 10 5 . 10 0 . 00 5 . 10 MINOR LEFTS WB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET72ND AVE . DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT • CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 33 154 148 148 115 D RIGHT 114 502 502 502 388 B MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 37 581 581 581 544 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET72ND AVE . DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT • 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET BONITA NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SEQUOIA NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 2 112 120 49 THRU 457 454 21 35 RIGHT 198 14 225 24 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 30 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES a MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 4 1 WESTBOUND 2 4 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 SB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 WB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 SB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 MINOR LEFTS NB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 SB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET BONITA NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING . . CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 136 102 58 > 63 58 > -97 -78 >F F THROUGH 24 139 109 > 109 > 86 > E RIGHT 255 701 701 701 446 A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 55 66 32 > 44 32 > -50 -23 >F F THROUGH 39 120 94 > 94 > 54 > E RIGHT 27 796 796 796 769 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 2 598 598 598 595 A WB LEFT 130 459 459 459 329 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET BONITA NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET BONITA NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SEQUOIA NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE : 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- -- -- - - - - - -- - LEFT 2 130 140 49 THRU 466 459 21 35 RIGHT 222 14 238 24 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 2 • . . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 30 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 4 1 WESTBOUND 2 4 1 NORTHBOUND 2 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 1 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 SB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 WB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 SB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 MINOR LEFTS NB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 SB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET BONITA NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE - RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 159 94 47 > 50 47 > -132 -112 >F F THROUGH 24 130 94 > 94 > 70 > E RIGHT 270 684 684 684 414 A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 55 66 28 > 38 28 > -56 -27 >F F THROUGH 39 109 78 > 78 > 39 > E RIGHT 27 793 793 793 766 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 2 594 594 594 591 A WB LEFT 151 436 436 436 285 C IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET BONITA NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET GEVURTZ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SEQUOIA PKWY NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE : T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB -- - - - - - - - -- - ---- LEFT - - 4 0 9 THRU - - 0 364 336 RIGHT - - 2 2 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES - - 1 1 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND --- - WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS a COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND - - - --- - - - WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5 . 50 5 . 50 0 . 00 5 . 50 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 . 00 5 . 00 0 . 00 5 . 00 MINOR LEFTS WB 6 . 50 6 . 50 0 . 00 6 . 50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET GEVURTZ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 4 316 314 > 314 > 309 > B > 384 > 378 >B RIGHT 2 696 696 > 696 > 694 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 10 790 790 790 779 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET GEVURTZ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING 4 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET GEVURTZ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SEQUOIA PKWY NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE : T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB -- -- - --- --- - - - -- LEFT -- 4 0 9 THRU -- 0 397 379 RIGHT -- 2 2 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES -- 1 1 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND --- - - - - WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION $ SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES °s MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND - -- - -- - - - WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 5 . 50 5 . 50 0 . 00 5 . 50 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 . 00 5 . 00 0 . 00 5 . 00 MINOR LEFTS WB 6 . 50 6 . 50 0 . 00 6 . 50 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET GEVURTZ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE - RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 4 281 278 > 278 > 274 > C > 346 > 339 >B RIGHT 2 669 669 > 669 > 667 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 10 759 759 759 749 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET GEVURTZ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL _ FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 11 264 257 > 257 > 246 > C > 435 > 400 >A RIGHT 23 648 648 > 648 > 625 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 33 746 746 746 713 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET McMENAMINS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET72ND AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 BUILDOUT 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL LANE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SEQUOIA PKWY NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE : 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND : STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB -- -- -- - - ---- -- - - LEFT 27 69 30 10 THRU 15 27 211 234 RIGHT 44 34 48 9 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 2 ' a . . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0 . 00 90 30 N WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 30 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 0 WESTBOUND 2 1 0 NORTHBOUND 2 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 WB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 NB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 WB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 MINOR LEFTS EB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 WB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL LANE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING . I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 31 314 282 282 252 C THROUGH 17 394 381 > 381 > 364 > B RIGHT 50 919 919 > 676 919 > 609 869 >A A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 78 326 297 297 218 C THROUGH 31 408 394 > 394 > 364 > B RIGHT 39 910 910 > 576 910 > 507 871 >A A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 11 786 786 786 775 A NB LEFT 34 803 803 803 769 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL LANE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1995 EXISTING • 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . 9 AREA POPULATION 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL LANE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET SEQUOIA PKWY NAME OF THE ANALYST DPO DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-02-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 COMBINED INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB - -- - --- - -- - - - -- - LEFT 38 69 32 10 THRU 15 27 228 250 RIGHT 46 34 48 16 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 2 2 f r ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0 . 00 90 30 N WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 30 N NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES 6 MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 2 1 0 WESTBOUND 2 1 0 NORTHBOUND 2 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 WB 5 . 70 5 . 70 0 . 00 5 . 70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 NB 5 . 60 5 . 60 0 . 00 5 . 60 MINOR THROUGHS EB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 WB 6 . 80 6 . 80 0 . 00 6 . 80 MINOR LEFTS EB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 WB 7 . 30 7 . 30 0 . 00 7 . 30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL LANE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 COMBINED ti . CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 43 293 261 261 218 C THROUGH 17 370 357 > 357 > 340 > B RIGHT 52 906 906 > 657 906 > 588 854 >A A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 78 301 273 273 194 D THROUGH 31 380 366 > 366 > 335 > B RIGHT 39 900 900 > 547 900 > 478 862 >A A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 11 768 768 768 757 A NB LEFT 36 778 778 778 742 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET CARDINAL LANE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREETSEQUOIA PKWY DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-02-1995 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1996 COMBINED CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL -/*Ohl I CITY OF TIGARD DATE: 6 ` 13 -c16 STAFF: Will 1� k13 ?144 APPLICANT: AGENT: GIN ld4A4N Phone: ( ) Phone: ( ) p5 r7 735 a PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: TAX MAPITAX LOT: OS! /c9A41%' — 240/I L400, 300 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): 5I-rE DeV l-c, 3t nJ7 ISV/EvJ Z-07 C41v� AlylVs1 4EA T PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: /1�IC,IY(FA)4A4/,AJ$ lC u) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACILITATOR: TEAM AREA: f"ts PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. ft. Average lot width: 50 ft. Maximum building height: Lf5 ft. Setbacks: front 35 ft. side —^ ft. rear -- ft. corner 00 ft. from street. Maximum site coverage:/S-80 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: ae,-a6-% (Refer to Code Section 18. GS ) ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREME Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless Is i created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of fri, .1• or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 NON-Residential applicationiPlannmg Department Section The depth of all lots shall not er.^pd 21/2 times the average width, unless the par—)1 is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 lots) SPECIAL SETBACKS • Streets: 3C) feet from the centerline of BOMittsq • Established areas: feet from • Lower intensity.zones: feet, alon a site's boundary. • Flag lot: 1 t of side yard setback. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.040 and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptio - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: • aximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least Y2 (half) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zone district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) Fx,S—> t c- 1�5 PARKING AND ACCESS > l N -� i�.,r�t rntrsE Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Required parking for this type of use: efri 161 t DgooKoJ(T /:GO D/,Uj,+ 4ReAf f 1v5 Secondary use required parking: /:&'gMplo,oes- No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated andlor dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. • Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) • Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 30 Minimum pavement width: c9 f i All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use q areas: • (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 NON-Residential application/Planning Department Section WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS_ Walkways shall extend from II " Jund floor entrances or from the ground landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial compleses. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new develpment and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, roadlrailroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. ft. along east boundary. ft. along south boundary. ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along 79-PtS\-1 `3 —R 1`C\C,\KYA LANDSCAPING T Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 NON-Residential aopiicanon,Plannmg Department Section SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained to installation of any sign in the City of 1 . A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable fort development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference sed on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans subrpitted with the development application. / Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the/de, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100-year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. i (Refer to Code Section 18.84)RRATIVE� The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.98 — 18.114 18.150 18.84 18.100 18.116 18.160 18.88 — 18.102 ./18.120 18.162 18.92 ✓ 18.106 18.130 ✓ 18.164 18.96 ✓18.108 18.134 ORH00D MEE The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee+s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. I�t;LIN Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 NON-Residential applicanomPlannmg Department Sec:on ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMME. �rl "PAK (7 IR lR g )7 4M) 7Rovls/0d f .T/C7 t2giN4/M/6 c20' S pt oP teveo 1&I7 5/rt. - -To ii\)-t n cc Es pft-g e.r )6 z AF 7Ec ,P2r/Cff/ 72,4,e41...,* IA) �JO f t 7J7J0� PROCEDURE P.' Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 NON-Residential application:Planning Department Section The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard ?ILA-'A)/tveo epM/y115S'10/-) . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site .................................. plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) islare required if an application(s) islare to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: W i/SAM D'A ) 4 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 h:Iloginipattvanasterstpreapp-cmst Engineering Section:masters!preapp-c.engl CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 NON-Residential applicationjP!anning Department Section A PUBLIC FACILITIES CITY OF TIGARD The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: OREGON (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: ..X/S77 A/G -72. 5 /,Q/w fO2. ST:rWo ,41-- (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (1.) to feet from centerline. (2.) to feet from centerline. (3.) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: P /$€ 9 64.21 �d1��Lr c � SS boil'). c� (9,�— — (1.) street improve will be necessary along (2.) street improvements will be necessary along (3.) Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. p/zi�U ?vvo�k- 5 � r3 6.... Ala st;y4kr- A 4 "1;. re27z. co.n A) Pair, CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 3 Residential ApplicationlEngineering Department Section In some cases, where street ;- :sovements or other necessary public imprr. -lents are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. " .uch cases, a condition of development app, may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: (1.) . (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in 'Wc f,tl014- . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's �/7/ //, /N/GC-fat. Water Supply: The Water District - Phone:(503) � provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526.2502) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: Storm sewer improvements: STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90.43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility andlor the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be y� constructed. Oti-S/7 7 GV('/ ! ' J g5cpcii CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 3 Residential ApplicationlEngineering Oepartment Section TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. i F'A � C� �� f''t"T 4 is j STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: ' ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 h:ll oginl pat t y 1pre ap p.ms t leng.section preapp.engl January 11, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3 Residential ApplicationiEngineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Al, APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: \'-W b`g Jb 4 Date: <o" "q6" APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed >� D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies l E) Filing Fee $ SEE FEE. StitettLV I SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MARKED ITEMS I A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies It3 1. Vicinity map I 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) car 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ❑ 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources ❑�. 10. Location of existing utilities and easements �I 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 1 OF 5 B) Site Develoamei an Indicating: No. of Copies I a 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals re/' 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties GL/ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site p/ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site Er (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e" (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site m/ (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities r� 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11. The location of all structures and their orientation a� 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements r .I C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies IS The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines e'' (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals le/ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated re LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 • D) Architectural Drawings Indicating: No. of Copies lg The site develop=.= ,t plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures e/' proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1 / The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials w 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used er F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies )g 1. The owner of the subject parcel 2. The owner's authorized agent e' 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries e� 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel Fe. 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines rr' 7. Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level GY 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements 11. For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions a� 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND LSE APPLICATION,/LIST PAGE 3 OF 3 • • I) Subdivisi. Prelimina Plat Ma. and Data Indicatin:: No. of Copies 1. Scale e'uah .1, 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch 0.1d limited to one phase p_ sheet ❑ 2. The prop•.ed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity ma, showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addre ses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surv-, er and designer (as applicable) a 5. Date of applica .n ❑ 6. Boundary lines o tract to be subdivided a 7. Names of adjacen subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels o un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines relate. to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades gre. er than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, pe and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the propose, subdivision): (a) Public and private ight-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private s. nitary and storm sewer lines a (c) Domestic water mai . including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telepho e transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for p rks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles .f proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indi ated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distr •ution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire by,rants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles s .wing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a re. sonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed st -et right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to in ndation or storm water overflow a 15. Location, width & direction of flow o -II water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, appro imate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be use. for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon su• lots. a 17. The location of all trees with a diameter : inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the locatio of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including he location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a tatement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivisi. improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, etlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practically be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a na ative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 4 OF 5 J) Solar Acces Calt _.ations: ❑ K) Other Informati n No. of Copies ❑ h:'Jogin\patty\mastersm.ckl ist.mst May 23, 1995 L3,ND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 5 OF 5 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON a. ,iJ,1,1 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON TO: Bill Monahan R FROM: Dick Bewersdorff ' )A,./") DATE: August 25, 1995 SUBJECT: Approved Land Use Decisions Through 8/25/95 Decision Issued Date: 8/25/95 Final Appeal Date : 9/4/95 1.) SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0016/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 95-0015 SMETSITRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CO. >MCMENAMIN'S PUB & BREWERY The Tigard Planning Director has APPROVED, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS (attached), a request for the following applications: 1.) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 3,630 square foot restaurant; and 2) Lot Line Adjustment request to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. LOCATION: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. (Vicinity Map below) 1 i ; ' :/:ITE 1 � %; I a I p ■ lc P,! .1 \ , A, , I \ \ , i i I L I ii CARDINAL LA I I , 1 1 . • - l ,1 - ZONE: I-P (Professional Industrial). The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance. and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products. packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68. 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. h:JogmApatty8.25-95.m2(page 1 of 11 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SOR 95-0016 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MIS 95-0015 MCMENAMINS PUB APPLICATION: The applicant requests the following development applications: 1) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 3,630 square foot restaurant; and 2) Lot Line Adjustment request to adjust two parcels of approximately 1.38 and .14 acres into two parcels of approximately .85 and .67 acres respectively. Zoning: I-P (Professional Industrial). Location: 6830 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12AD, tax lots 300 and 400). West of Interstate 5, south of SW Bonita Road and east of SW Sequoia Parkway. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE MICHAEL ANDERSON OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. '. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit to reconstruct the existing driveway onto SW Sequoia Parkway and the new sewer service lateral for the restaurant. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 2. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall submit a at sire adjustment survey showing the existing and proposed lot lines, and legal descriptions of the parcels for review and approval by the Engineering Department. The private sewer service lateral easement for the existing industrial building across the restaurant site shall be shown cn the final plat. STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering Department. Washington County has established and the City has agreed to collect Traffic Impact Fees ln accordance with Resolution No. 90-65. The applicant shall pay the fee established for the proposed use. 5. The applicant shall submit a drainage plan and calculations for the proposed water quality facilities for approval by the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. SOP 95-1,016 S IS 9.5-0015 PAGE NO. '.1cMena min's?,.0 3 Brewery NOTICE OF OE.,ISICN 6. The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. 7. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Impervious surface/landscape calculations.This calculation shall include the total development site, both to ensure McMenamin's compliance as well as the existing development's compliance. Developments within the I-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping except that 20%can be provided when: 1) Street trees are installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than two inches at four feet in height; 2) The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of ten feet; and 3) All applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied. b. Forty-four parking spaces for the McMenamin's proposal. The applicant shall either adjust the property lines to provide the required parking for each respective use on their respective parcel or provide a reciprocal parking agreement between the two lots. c. Screening of the 12 parking spaces in the southeast corner of the property adjacent to SW Sequoia Parkway d. Location and screening of the trash enclosure. e. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off. Regardless of which method is chosen. the applicant shall provide a written hauler sian-off regarding the location and compatibility of service equipment. 8. Deed restrictions shall be submitted which limit the area to be used for retail sales, convenience sales and personal services, children's day care, personal services facilities, and eating and drinking establishments to a maximum of 20% of the entire square footage of the development complex. The I-P (Industrial Park) zone limits these uses to 20% of the entire square footage of the development complex. 9. An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted to the Police Department for review and approval. Staff Contact: Kelly Jennings, Police Department. SDP?5 3016IMIS 35-0015 PAGE NO. McMenamin s Pub&Brewery NOTICE OF DECISION 7 / \ ' CITY OF TIGARD CQfGO 4 SE J rING r,�E S7,4NCARC FOP SERVICE EXCELLENCE • ,. Facsimile I /' ( / - O c rncany: I \ Phone: I Fax: ( '') From: I (i_ Com pany: ! City of iigar& /' Phone: ( (573) 539-417+ (,<F):).0, Fax: I (573) 584-7297 Oats: 1 Pages :rc:acing this page: i . _ ,■....-%11',z -- 4Vitr3f-A1:17j./ -- , 4 / 1 L., g,.../ /.Y t/i ``/Ct- `-1 Lam- L 17�Cyi./e•C• ,9 (_ , r,/,.<-9'/7 1 k.,,‘4/ //Icy 71.,,,wit . A tn.,61- -e__) i -61-)fdi . 1,1..E 4.i,/ 4- 0/', / • / .. =I � X ` :ti--7:7 --!S =-1`i M A •f " U8, ;:5; 95 19:19 2503 684 7297 L111 OF T1GARO 4gUUl *sss:s*s ss s*sss*s**ssss***ss*ssss*ss*s*** sss ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT TX s** sss*s*ss*s sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *5282'TI 6846544 WENDI HAWLEY 08/24 15:04 00'00 0 NG 0 #018 :5286 TX G3 503 285 7381 08/24 15:31 07'30 11 OK *5287'TI G3 619 546 8807 08/24 15:43 08'40 15 OK *5300 TI G3 503 624 7755 PACTRUST/M&T/PDA 08/25 10:22 01'33 3 OK :5301 TI G3 5036911005 08/25 10:38 02'01 3 OK *5302 1'1 G3 8355395 08/25 11:06 00'39 1 OK *5307 TI G3 08/25 11:24 01'07 3 OK *5308 TX G3 503 693 4412 08/25 11:26 01'27 3 OK *5309 TI G3 5056920955 08/25 12:19 02'25 4 OK *5310 TI G3 5036203433 TIGARD TIMES 08/25 12:23 01'30 2 OK *5312 TI G3 206 694 0188 08/25 13:49 00'49 1 OK *5313 TX G3 000 08/25 14:23 00'44 1 OK *5318 TI G3 503 893 4412 08/25 16:39 01'31 2 OK *5319 TI G3 503 893 4412 08/25 17:02 00'36 1 OK *5321 TI G3 503 620 5983 KEN SCHECKLA 08/25 18:46 02'13 3 NG 3 ##283 *5322 TX G3 6846544 WENDI HAWLEY 08/25 18:50 02'36 4 OK *5324 TI G3 503 620 2086:NICOLI ENG. ,Inc. 08/25 18:55 02'14 4 OK *5320 TI G3 5907654 BOB ROHLF 08/25 18:59 02'41 4 OK *5327 TI G3 503 620 296912111030 PAUL HUNT 08/25 19:04 02'36 3 OK 5321 TI G3 503 620 5983 KEN SCHECKLA 08/25 19:12 03'00 4 OK 5330 TX G3 503 620 296912111030 PAUL HUNT 08/25 19:16 02'41 4 OK *ssssss sss*****$******s****************** :*: ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT RI ss* *******************:*******sss*******t*** ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *5285 AUTO RI G3 08/24 15:05 01'17 1 OK :5289 AUTO RI G3 503 243 2944 08/24 16:02 03'27 6 OK *5290 AUTO RI G3 503 243 2944 08/24 16:06 03'29 6 OK *5291 AUTO RI G3 5032432944 08/24 16:11 01'21 3 OK *5292 AUTO RI G3 503 243 2944 08/24 16:14 03'26 6 OK *5293 AUTO RI G3 18006911051 08/24 16:22 00'44 1 OK *5294 AUTO RI G3 503 245 5977 08/24 21:28 01'33 2 OK *5295 AUTO RI G3 503 639 1232 08/25 06:53 02'19 4 OK *5297 AUTO RI G3 1 503 681 3993 08/25 08:14 01'06 2 OK *5298 AUTO RI G3 503 254 6761 08/25 08:45 00'37 1 OK *5299 AUTO RI G3 08/25 10:10 01'19 1 OK *5303 AUTO RI G3 503 624 0157 08/25 11:11 03'55 4 OK $5304 AUTO RI G3 503 678 1108 08/25 11:18 01'09 2 OK *5305 AUTO RI G3 503 7318531 08/25 11:20 02'47 4 OK *5311 AUTO RI G3 08/25 13:26 00'52 1 OK :5314 AUTO RI G3 5901404 08/25 14:56 01'59 3 OK *5315 AUTO RI G3 5035574232 08/25 15:28 00'50 1 OK *5316 AUTO RI G3 360 943 6910 ESRI OLYMPIA WA 08/25 16:06 01'34 3 OK *5317 AUTO RI G3 503 220 2480 STOEL RIVES 2 08/25 16:21 01'38 3 OK 09-15-1995 10:39AM FROM Triangle Development Co. TO 6847297 P.01 - 15455 Hallmark Drive YS" R Suite 150 � lake Oslo.OR 97035 \.°!� - Phone(503)699-5010 Fax(503)699-5029 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FAX Transmittal Date: Transmission Confirmation: To: vial E /hdws_ Initials Time Company: ( T itA From: Jeff Sa kett Regarding: 11441444<-4“-)-s P5 614-6 6r-aoi‘ Number of Pages Including FAX Transmittal Page: 3 Documents Transmitted WILL WILL NOT V Follow by Mail. Comments: fte_mt__ 445-7(ilf- ote-- eye AJ04,J 5,( . plege kfuri'ecks 1( lel- tA_Ak. J a.ve. ‘S va.sai► a (Alk A 1 • F 1 I FAX Number: —1v r7 ********************, *************************************************** 09-15-1995 10:40AM FROM Triangle Development Co. TO 6847297 P.02 OWNER'S DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION to be effective upon its recording in Washington County, Oregon is made and executed this day of , 1995, by the undersigned, herein "Declarant." Declarant is the owner of certain real property in the City of Tigard, Washington county, Oregon, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") . As a condition of approval Of Site Development Review SDR-9S-0016 pertaining to the Property, the City of Tigard has required Declarant to record a document which restates of record a specific requirement of the current land use zone applicable to the Property (I-P Industrial Park) . Owner hereby declares that section 18.68.030 A.2.o of the Tigard Community Development Code, as restated below, applies to the Property. "o The following uses, separately or in combination, shall not exceed a total of 20 percent of the entire square footage within the development complex= (1) Convenience sales and personal services; (ii) Children's day care; (iii) Eating and drinking establishments; (iv) Personal services facilities; and (v) Retail sales, general." This Declaration shall apply to the Property until such time as either: 1. The string designation of the Property is changed from I-P to any other sone; or 2. Tigard Community Development Coda 18.68.030 A.2.o is amended to allow a higher percentage of the stated uses. - 1 - (WWI rtu70/993f3JJL KL12100.1) r 09-15-1995 10:41AM FROM Triangle Development Co. TO 6847297 P.03 S Upon the occurrence of either circumstances 1 or 2 stated above, this Declaration shall terminate. DECLARANT: The Smets Family Trust I By: • John E. Smets, Co-Trustee By: Marietta D. Sets, Co Trustee STATE OF OREGON ) 55. County of _ ) This instrument was acknowledged before as this day of , 1995, by John E. Smets, as Co-Trustee of { The Smets Family Trust I. • NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: • STATE of OREGON ) ) ss. County of ) This instrument was acknowledged before as this day of , 1995, by Marietta D. Smets, as Co-T is ee of The Smets Family Trust I. k j NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: E • - 2 - men) . 09/21/95 11:46 12503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL fj001/002 p *R *I *D* E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 (503)625-6177 TELEPHONE: (503) 625-6177 FAX it (503) 625-6179 FAX COVER SHEET DATE; 61- C;? TO: Ottr TELEPHONE: � / FAX NUMBER: b`"i 7a7 ATTENTION: FROM: , WE ARE SENDING .Z, PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) . IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL U5 AS SOON A POSSIBLE. THANK YOU! 09/21/95 11:46 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL IJ002/002 99,21,9' +57 'a 503 253 ]150 Le r 1 Pf1RK 01 / MCMLNAMINS DREW P11H-TIGARD.OREGON DATE: SIiY'1'LML L1t 20, 1995 R1ivISON SIII'.F'r A 1 -TRASH ENCLOSURE A'Ii LN'l'ION: MR.LENNY IZINC;-PRIDE DISPOSAL-!'AX-42R.GI79 IN hF;SPt)NRI:iv OUR MItI"I'INU OF T111!4 DACE,THIS I'OLLOWING INI'ORMA7'ION IS SUAMITI'I D. I)r:IAII. ■ 5 (4 le,2m�, WI) ` Pr,dllu... Elrspos s Co . Z _.. ■ 0 K 6 ,./.„,,,z.:„!/ .///////!/2.1,!/////!/ f i G 4 i -awe ,..w.‹ .44s[? a•c-1 11 rteSI�/�1� r ' Fs I � LGP'et e: z f C'. . + A6_ 0 /4T/4 e A d.' /B" !'° 1 I IAMHI.IN HATTAN AROII'r c 1 M PC- 1 122 NE. 122ND AVE-TEL.257-7332 09-12-1995 04:54PM FROM Triangle Development Co. TO 6847297 P.01 — 15455 Hallmark Drive Suite 150 lake Oswego,OR 97035 Phone(503)699-5010 -- – Fax(503)699-5029 TRIA\GLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FAX Transmittal Date: I) 2 L95 Transmission Confirmation: To: G'�1 j H H a'Zcr"eGt. Initials Time Company: (-1/1•11 1 OF i I G D From: Karen Collinson 11 Regarding: 1\.1 C Miv } t t-' WE—LJ R r� Number of Pages Including FAX Transmittal Page: Documents Transmitted WILL WILL NOT )( Follow by Mail. Comments: t■1 I I ectse. c Ct 11 ct u 0 ue5-h oTts J Kav - FAX Number: O - Z ************************************************************************ s 09-12-1995 04:54PM FROM Triangle Development Co. TO 6847297 P.02 MEMO FOR RECORD AND REFERENCE MCMENAMINS TIGARD PUB DATE: AUGUST 21, 1995 TO: MR. WILLIAM D'ANDREA REFERENCE: DESIGN REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR CONVERSATION OF AUGUST 18, 1995,THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED: ITEM 1. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. A. TOTAL AREA OF SITE - 73,800 SF. B. AREA OF SMETS LOT- 44,800 SF. C. AREA OF MCMENAMIN LOT- 29,000 SF. ITEM 2. SOLID WASTE CONTRACTOR WILL BE CONTACTED FOR LETTER OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT. ITEM 3. EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN. THE ENCLOSED PLAN INDICATES BOTH EXISTNG cam,/. LIGHTING AS WELL AS PROPOSED LIGHTING. 'CI ITEM 4. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT 1IC A. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT MAY BE REDUCED TO 20 PERCENT OF THE ' ( - k TOTAL PROPERTY DUE TO SIZE OF EXISTING STREET TREES. (73,800 SF X 20 PERCENT= 1.4,760 SF.) B. EXISTING LANDSCAPING-SMETS SUB DIVIDED LOT-4,600 SF C. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING-MCMENAMINS SUB DIVIDED LOT- 11,225 SF D. TOTAL LANDSCAPING- 15,825 SF. ITEM 5. PARKING REQUIREMENTS - %Q� A S ^� vR-T A. BASED ON A SEATING REA OF,4,692SF/THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS WILL WILL BE AS FOLLOWS 34 SPACES PLUS 4 SPACES FOR STAFF-TOTAL 38 SUBMITTED BY HAMBLIN RATTAN ARCHITECTS PC. M.LEON HAMBLIN PARTNER 9 September 27, 1995 Mr. Mike McMenamin McMenamins Pubs & Breweries 1624 NW Glisan Portland, OR 97209 RE: McMenamins Brew Pub 14610 SW Sequoia Parkway Tigard, Oregon Dear Mike: Current plans for subject project provide for 41 parking stalls on your parcel. The City of Tigard has indicated that 44 stalls are required under the zoning code. This letter will serve as our agreement, as owner of the property and your landlord, to allow you to use three (3) parking stalls on the balance of the property owned or controlled by us at this location for the duration of the lease term. This agreement is a further clarification of additional parking rights as stated in our lease with you. Sincerely yours, The Smets Family Trust I c. l-....2c.f tte John E. Smets, Co-Trustee -)), Z j_, .._ < Marietta D. Smets, Co-Trustee k ial3 OFFICIAL SEAL -1�,t4 CARL V ANDERSON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.028243 MY COMMISSION EY,?; :: PT.26, 1997 OWNER' S DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION to be effective upon its recording in Washington County, Oregon is made and executed this day of , 1995 , by the undersigned, herein "Declarant . " Declarant is the owner of certain real property in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property" ) . As a condition of approval of Site Development Review SDR-95-0016 pertaining to the Property, the City of Tigard has required Declarant to record a document which restates of record a specific requirement of the current land use zone applicable to the Property (I-P Industrial Park) . Owner hereby declares that section 18 . 68 . 030 A. 2 . o of the Tigard Community Development Code, as restated below, applies to the Property. "o The following uses, separately or in combination, shall not exceed a total of 20 percent of the entire square footage within the development complex: (i) Convenience sales and personal services ; (ii) Children' s day care; (iii) Eating and drinking establishments ; (iv) Personal services facilities ; and (v) Retail sales , general . " This Declaration shall apply to the Property until such time as either: 1 . The zoning designation of the Property is changed from I-P to any other zone; or 2 . Tigard Community Development Code 18 . 68 . 030 A. 2 .o is amended to allow a higher percentage of the stated uses . - 1 - (SWW1/78420/99243/11A/622100.1) Upon the occurrence of either circumstances 1 or 2 stated above, this Declaration shall terminate. DECLARANT: The Smets Family Trust I By: John E. Smets, Co-Trustee 4" By: Marietta D. Smets, Co-Trustee STATE OF OREGON ss . County of /Y101Z4oi ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this 2°jkh day of 5r X1,1& - , 1995, by John E. Smets, as Co-Trustee of The Smets Family Trust I . OFFICIAL SEAL CO V CARL V ANDERSON NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON "\; NOTARY PUBLIC.-OREGON Expires : 9 ZG yCOMMISSION NO.028248 My Commission MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.26,1997 STATE OF OREGON ss . County of fiW h/'?J ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this 2.5'fh day of 54-47vI2,a-t._— , 1995, by Marietta D. Smets, as Co-Trustee of The Smets Family Trust I . C------ 14:7, OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON �,.. ���'��•< CARL.V ANDERSON My Commission Expires : 7/ 09' �.f NOTAR74UBLIG-OREGON COMNSISION NO.028248 r MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 26.1997 • - 2 - (SWW1/78420/99243/11-A/622100.1) EXHIBIT A WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS NC. ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Phone: 503 684-0652 Fax: 503 624-0157 Adjusted Tax Lot 25 1 12AD 400 John E. Smets, Trustee September 26, 1995 • Project No.: 982-01-95 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in the northeast one quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon also being a portion of Lot 4 of Bonita Gardens, recorded in plat book 5, page 11 records of Washington County, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of that tract of land granted to John E. Smets, Trustee of the Smets family trust in that document recorded as document 91-61228, Washington County deed records; thence, along the south line of said Lot 4 of said Bonita Gardens, South 89°20'42" West, 153.50 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence, along said south line of said Parcel 4, South 89°20'42" West, 50.00 feet to the east line of Sequoia Parkway as granted to the city of Tigard in the deed recorded as document number 89-27151, Washington County deed records; thence, along said east line of said Sequoia Parkway, North 0°29'12" West, 327.12 feet to the south line of that tract of land described in the deed recorded in book 1013 page 923, Washington County deed records; thence, along said south line, along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radial bearing at the Point of Beginning of South 24°23'56" West, a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 34°40'53", a long chord of South 82°56'30" East, 59.61 feet, an arc length of 60.53 feet; thence, North 79°43'03" East, 38.27 feet; thence, leaving said south line of book 1013, page 923 South 0°29'12" East, 242.12 feet; thence, South 89°20'42" West, 11.80 feet; ill Pacific Corporate Center, 15115 S.W.Sequoia Parkway, Suite 150,Tigard,Oregon 97224 Page 1 of 4 Page 2 of 2 Property Description Project No.: 982-01-95 thence South 0°29'12" East, 8.67 feet; • thence, South 89°20'42" West, 35.00 feet; thence, South 0°29'12" East, 74.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description Containing 27,468 square feet. 98201- ki • 111 Page 2 of 4 • WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC. ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Phone: 503 684-0652 Fax: 503 624-0157 • Adjusted Tax Lot 2S 1 12AD 300 & 200 John E. Smets, Trustee September 19, 1995 Project No.: 982-01-95 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION • A tract of land situated in the northeast one quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, also being a portion of Lot 4 of • Bonita Gardens, recorded in plat book 5, page 11, records of Washington County, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of that tract of land granted to John E. Smets, Trustee of the Smets family trust in that document recorded as document 91-61228, Washington County deed records; thence, along the south line•of said Lot 4 of said Bonita Gardens, South 89°20'42" West, 153.50 feet; thence, leaving said south line, North 0°29'12" West, 74.67 feet; thence, North 89°20'42" East, 35.00 feet; thence, North 0°29'12" West, 8.67 feet; thence, North 89°20'42" East, 11.80 feet; thence, North 0°29'12" West, 242.12 feet to the south line of that tract of land described in the deed recorded in book 1013, page 923, Washington County deed records; thence, along the south line of said book 1013, page 923, North 79°43'03" East, 108.27 feet to the west line of that tract of land described in the deed recorded as document number 91- 61228, Washington County deed records; thence, along the west line of said 91-61228, North 0°29'12" West, 5.49 feet; • 111 Pacific Corporate Center, 15115 S.W.Sequoia Parkway, Suite 150,Tigard,Oregon 97224 Page 3 of 4 Page 2 of 2 Property Description Project No.: 982-01-95 thence, North 89°20'42" East, 20.00 feet; thence, South 0°29'12" East, 349.00 feet; thence, South 89°20'42" West, 20.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of this description. Containing 46,265 square feet. Paso,_ • • 111 Page 4 of 4 05-21-1996 03:42PM FRfM Triangle Development Co. TO 6847297 P.01 is4ss weak Mier Spice 150 • . 4 . r „.?-7 .7!- ,,--,: lake Oswego,OR 97035 _ \\ Phone(503)699-5010 — Fax(503)699-5029 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FAX Transmittal Date: 6/94l9�p Transmission Confirmation: To: ..` Initials Time O Company: at c- 4 From: Jeff grdkett Regarding: -1-•47k tO i- QUIZ.- ,\.\"1 (6\te 1\-4 tare-c-ti AA') Number of Pages Including FAX Transmittal Page: Documents Transmitted WILL WILL NOT V Follow by Mail. Comments: Jo d — ' ,-(.40-cce( a:N.,4 et. )44' \ , , „. , 1 iiker o ems---t 6-"1(A-1 al ii .,u • (� I.A.J a-s ! • le S1 — 3'a cevt-`L i- 1 NtA, � `` 4 a� .( 'Av.,* 1' fu-Aic 14-- itt,t4reAlye- 11-12,-- pi,„....,ct- tekve_ 7-, L, 4Ou as IN i-+- tAM lAntAktra-ii 141-4-s Km/or/PA/13 s-,--A T-. i,i 3-00 t ct.o.c u ' > I "c4 - gym, ' s-11-1f-ifeA 1 a-,..a t-r(_ s 1 tIA-\\-c 4 tk.0 Ise-- 641— Wm,' 1-t U- 3-01 (N 4-0 4 , 3- tz , sc 1,e,- `11,..).,,._.k- — ,. ! 0114 FAX Number: Cc s 4—1711 ************************************************************************ 05-21-1996 03:43PM F Triangle Development Co. TO 6847297 P.02 • 0- • c C15-CI° • (40 ' THE NE S.W. BONITA ROAD SCALE 1" 50' Ai LIMO. bo (0(0 FOUND BRASS DISC IN MON BOX MARKED "DAVID EVANS • FOUND AS NOTED. 3 3 • do ASSOCIATES INC. 1990" 1 I I i 0 SET 5/8 IRON ROD Y fri'e,°� • WITH YELLOW PLASTIC O, = 63'54'57" CAP MARKED "WESTLAKE fn N R = 111.55' CONSULTANTS"i ON SEPTEMBER L 111.55' N 1 CH = N33'38'35"W 105.86' 16, 1995 0 SET AS NOTED O - 34'40'53' I R - 100.00' (N89•26'10"EL -� L - 60.53' 2 SQ. FT. SQUARE FEET +4,� CH = S82'56'30"E 59.61' (N00 N892 00'"E E (5.47)2 SN SURVEY NUMBER d N00'29'12'W ,31.E 146.54' 46.54)2 5.49' ( ) RECORD PER BOOK 71, PAGE 39 I N� ( �'S0 "E 1 46.54 L I 9.43'03 108.27 ( 2 RECORD PER S.N. 22,790 a 38.27 ��> 7 F Y S:T SCRIBE \ 1 LL' CONC. SIDEWALK SET SCRIBE ` ;0 a f / ON CONC. SIDEWALK p ) �� 51 �, ,tS 0 o-rn —,r�L1 .cO !, �ic."c� • S o re Z a� O 27,466 SQ. FT. iv IL f ci m C N Z 1:L. DO f Vic-- VA(S • N J N-, I J 0 ''' �n m PLAT OF PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER ,� BOOK 71, PAGE 39. m � "'T.x, 01 0 39,285 SQ. FT. ' SURVEY NUMBER 20,223 • ��,, _� R SURVEY NUMBER 22,790 ^_ ►� -T I, v0 �'1 -SURVEY NUMBER 15,750 co '�' `� Z a o, T. W cot SURVEY NUMBER 20,596 g gI GI I J a �o ;� = DOCUMENT NUMBER 91-61227 } j N I 1 DOCUMENT NUMBER 91-61228 II �y -, O' Sv St DOCUMENT NUMBER 91-61229 a ° FEE NUMBER 91-61229 re o 8° DOCUMENT NUMBER 89-27151 O' o ° z 12 SET SCRIBE j �i " o1 uJ a ON CONC. z (/) I SI / Z 72. d' —� �5 if 589'20'42"W w 11.80' • 20 N00'29.12"W i I 5441 0.0 i ' I FOUND 1" IRON PIPE �. N-0.60' W-0.65 in M I S4'+ N89 ROE PER S.N. 22,790 i i 5Q.00' $ 153.50' k, 4. /\.-- 1 N897042"E 223.50' • (N89'26'10"E 296.00') i' (N89•20'42"E) 2 FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH ALUMINUM CAP MARKED "DEA" IN MON BOX PER BOOK 71, PAGE 39 • JOB NO. 982-01 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: May 28, 1996 TO: Will D'Andrea, Planning Division ( � FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer�`— RE: Lot Line Adjustment for Smets (McMenamin's Pub) I was made aware of a situation regarding the above lot line adjustment where Washington County Cartography indicates that the proposed property line adjustment (PLA) can not be done. The tax lots involved are Tax Lots 300 and 400, Map 2S1 12AD. Tax Lot 400 has a"Ml" designation after it which means there are mineral rights over the tax lot. According to the County, this tax lot can not simply be added onto another parcel because a separate mineral rights account is set up for those specific lots. The County needs some way of tracking these accounts, and right now all they have are the tax maps. When they eventually get all their information on the GIS, we will not have these problems. Now, to handle the Smets' request. John Greninger(County cartographer) indicates that if the City approves of the new lot line location(which I am assuming we do since we approved the PLA request)then he will go ahead and draw the new lot line. However, since Tax Lot 400-M1 has to remain, the tax map will show TL 400-M1, TL 301 (which will be where the restaurant is) and TL 300 (now smaller). However, we will have to flag 301 and 400-M1 somehow to make sure they stay together. I also spoke with Steve Conway, Planner for the County, who indicated that they have dealt with this situation before. In order to make sure Tax Lot 400-M1 stays with TL 301, the City will need to flag it on our tax maps. When we get the updated tax maps, I can have Kit simply color in both lots and put on a note that says, "THESE TAX LOTS ARE ON ONE LOT OF RECORD. THEY CAN NOT BE SEPARATED", or something to that effect. In addition, I think we can flag the parcels in TIDEMARK the same. One additional step we will have to take is to notify the Department of Assessment and Taxation of the lot restriction. That way, this information will show up on a title report for the property. I have spoken again with Greninger and told him to go ahead and draw the new lot line on the tax maps. You can put this memo in your land use action file as a paper trail. Call me if you have questions. i:\eng\brianr\0528will.bdr PAGE 1 - k 25 k 1 2-AP )1 E 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION I -12S R 1 W W.M. WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNTY OREGON SCALE 1'1= 100' -4-- SEE MAP in aa 'In ile+001 N ± i • ,..+20.114 CANCELL‘ (CR 636-40 %VIDE ''‘;' BONITA T ROAD -... In - BEGIN at 636 (mow° 41"" = 7 „ ,,,,71;;„;:,„;;*"',"--"-----•=7"--WY/'''' 901 la I '3i6( T" 396' r INITIAL "o 6. ..i -0 POINT i 4........., b .r? -2 ID -0 Zo- ii5 -....... -W t-- 1 2 --1-- 211 TO PUBLIC 1013/923 100 I\\\\N zoE ,261 :: 17 3.79 AC. 104.20 EAST 95' i 1 . -----.-- 1204,00 . • Li°1 100 AI „-I• ILO .6/AC. 200--id 401-M1 .300 ./6 AC I L .e-.1 _..." d ..._ /38 A: a. . 200-MI ----.\ 1.- N Z , 4 \ , , ' .- (:) l' t- r- 4 cr, a a ... — ,..„ ■,___400 > ./4 AC. en 400 MI I E-- 1 I (-2) I. 1 1 U) ' Cr : Ili 1 I Z . I I 92 396' 96 84' .4' _icirtz2;cloril.c.w.imc 184.20 ( 116 ) 95 'C) 116 :. .71.217 -. .1011111141M••• ..* ■•• 624.41 1100 NB96f0•42mE st: ti. FO,' rr.075 AC. 6. PL.1= 1200S0! 900 ..:, z:, 5 11.14 AC. .: F0' 6 1200 SO I ( . I