SDR1995-00015 SD R95 - 00015
J . T . ROTH
OFFICE
BUILDING
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0015
ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
APPLICATION: The applicant requests site development review
approval to allow construction of a 4, 726 square foot office
building. Zone : C-P (Commercial Professional) . Location: 12500
SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200) . The site is located
at the south west corner of SW Franklin Street and SW 68th Street
SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning
Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request
subject to the following Conditions of Approval . The findings and
conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section
II .
Conditions of Approval :
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING.
CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED:
1 . Standard half-street improvements, including concrete
sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement,
sanitary sewer, and storm drainage shall be installed along
the SW Franklin Street frontage . Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to local street standards and shall
conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or
to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department .
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department .
2 . The applicant shall construct sidewalk along the frontage of
SW 68th Parkway and a new common driveway. The underground
storm drain connection to the existing system shall be
included in the public improvement plans.
3 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and
profile construction drawings shall be submitted for
preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7)
sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction
cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall
be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans
are in addition to any drawings required by the Building
Division and should only include sheets relevant to public
improvements . STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering
Department .
4 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the
guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 1
No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two part fee which is paid at
different times . The first part is paid with any associated
public improvements which is for that portion of the
development which increases the impervious area within the
public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building
Permit issuance which is for each individual lot .
5 . A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and
recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways.
The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all
applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by
the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF
CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department .
6 . The applicant shall place the overhead facilities along SW
Franklin Street underground or pay the fee in-lieu of
undergrounding.
7 . The applicant shall provide hydrology and hydraulic
calculations prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer for
the proposed storm drain system.
8 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff
can be discharged into the existing drainageways without
significantly impacting properties downstream. STAFF
CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department .
9 . Revised site/landscape plans and studies shall be submitted
for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact : Mark
Roberts, Planning Division
The revisions shall address the following:
a. Provision of a minimum of one bicycle rack with a
minimum of one bicycle parking space. The bicycle rack
shall be located near or adjoining a main building
entrance, preferably under cover.
b. Obtain a tree removal permit .
c . Provide a copy of the site plan for review and approval
by the franchised hauler review. STAFF CONTACT: Lenny
Hing, Pride Disposal (625-6177) .
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE
OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS :
10 . All site improvements shall be installed and maintained
pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans . STAFF
CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 2
1
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE
DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION.
SECTION II . FINDINGS OF FACT
1 . Background:
The subject property is presently undeveloped. The site is
thickly grown with trees and undergrowth.
2 . Vicinity Information:
The site is located on the south west corner of SW Franklin
Street and SW 68th Street . The property has been zoned C-P
(Commercial Professional) since the Comprehensive Plan was
acknowledged. The adjoining properties to the site are also
zoned C-P. Properties to the north, south and east are
developed with professional office uses or with the Landmark
Ford Dealership. The property to the west of the site is
presently undeveloped.
3 . Site Information and Proposal Description:
The site has street frontage on SW 68th Street and SW
Franklin Street . The site measures 100 by 150 feet . The
site slopes approximately eight feet in grade from a high
point towards SW Franklin and SW 68th to the south west .
4 . Other Staff Comments :
The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and
provided the following findings :
Findings :
STREETS :
The site is contiguous to SW 68th Parkway, which is
classified as a Major Collector street on the Comprehensive
Plan, and SW Franklin Street, a local street, and is located
within the Tigard Triangle Planning Area. The site plan
shows a driveway to SW Franklin Street and a joint use
driveway onto SW 68th Parkway, combined with the property to
the south.
The existing SW 68th Parkway right-of-way is 30 feet from
center line and no further dedications are required. SW 68th
Parkway has been improved with curbs and pavement . The
applicant should be required .to construct sidewalk along this
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 3
frontage, together with the new driveway construction. In
addition, the applicant shall provide a joint use and
maintenance agreement for the common driveway.
The existing SW Franklin Street right-of-way is also 30 feet
from center line. The roadway was partly constructed in 1995
with a 2/3 street improvement with the development of the
Louie Photography Studio on the property located across from
the site, on the northerly side of the street . The applicant
should complete the improvement of SW Franklin to City
Standards and construct a new curb at 17 feet from
centerline, together with the unfinished pavement and
utilities to join the existing construction.
Overhead utilities are existing on the southerly side of SW
Franklin Street and the poles are being utilized for the
street lighting system. No additional street lighting is
required for SW Franklin Street . The applicant has indicated
that the overhead facilities will be placed underground as a
part of the street construction.
SANITARY SEWER:
The site is currently served by the eight inch public
sanitary sewer line that is located in SW 68th Parkway. The
existing sewer has sufficient capacity for this project .
STORM SEWER:
The site slopes in a southwesterly direction towards the
adjacent undeveloped property. The applicant proposes to
grade the parking lot and site to a new underground on-site
drainage system that will connect to the existing system in
SW 68th Parkway. The applicant shall prepare a hydrology and
hydraulic study to determine if the existing system has
sufficient capacity and is not unduly affected by the
additional runoff from the site .
The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has
agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface
Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of
on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their
construction. Section 7 . 10b of the above noted Resolution
and Order cites conditions under which the fee in-lieu may be
accepted. Specifically, it provides, that if, "The site is
small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area
for the on-site facility would preclude the effective
development . " , the fee may apply. It is our opinion that
this site is consistent with this criteria, and we recommend
that a fee in-lieu be required.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 4
Agency Comments :
The Tualatin Valley Fire District reviewed this application
and provided the following comments concerning this
development :
1) Provide fire flow calculations for the building. Submit
plans to the Fire District to perform this review.
2) A fire hydrant shall be placed no more than 250 feet from
all portions of the building.
3) Emergency vehicle access appears to have been met .
No other comments have been received.
SECTION III . ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
Use Classification: The subject property is zoned Commercial
Professional (C-P) . The applicant is proposing to develop
vacant property with a professional office building. The
professional office use is the primary permitted use for
property within this zoning district as provided in Section
18 . 64 (Commercial Professional) and as further defined in
Section 18 .42 (Use Classifications) .
Minimum Lot Area: Section 18 . 64 the Commercial Professional
Zoning District states that there is a minimum lot area
requirement of 6, 000 square feet . The site is approximately
. 34 acres or 15, 000 square feet which is in excess of the
minimum requirement . The average parcel width required
within the Commercial Professional Zoning District is 50
feet . The site has an average width of approximately 100
feet which exceeds the standard.
Setback and Height : Section 18 . 64 . 050 states that there is
no front, side or rear yard setbacks. Except that clear
vision area and parking lot screening requirements must be
met . These standards are reviewed elsewhere within this
report . The building as proposed comply with the Special
Setback requirement which is 30 feet from the centerline of
SW 68th Street . The building is proposed to be located 33
feet from the centerline of SW 68th Street .
The maximum allowed building height is 45 feet in the
Commercial Professional Zoning District . The proposed
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 5
buildings would not exceed a maximum height of approximately
21 feet in compliance with the maximum height standard.
Landscaping Plan: Section 18 . 100 requires that the applicant
submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a
minimum of 15% of the site. The C-P zone allows a maximum of
85% of the site to be covered with buildings and impervious
surfaces . The applicant has submitted a plan indicating the
type and location of landscaping to be provided. This plan
proposes 85% lot coverage with 15% of the site to be
developed with landscaping which complies with landscape
development standards .
Street Trees : Section 18 . 100 . 035 states that all development
projects fronting on a public street shall be required to
plant street trees . Section 18 . 100 . 035 requires that street
trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the
size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or
large) .
The site has approximately 140 feet of frontage along SW 68th
Street which is available from planting. The landscape plan
indicates that a total of four new Norway Maple trees would
be provided at a spacing of approximately 35 feet on center.
The site has approximately 75 feet of frontage on SW Franklin
Street . Two Norway Maple trees would be provided also at a
spacing of 35 feet on center on the SW Franklin Street
frontage . Based on their large size at maturity these trees
satisfy the street tree planting requirement .
Screening: Special Provisions : Section 18 . 100 . 110 (A)
requires the screening of parking and loading areas .
Landscaped parking areas shall include special design
features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from
view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a
relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and
trees .
Trees shall also be planted in landscaped islands in all
parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis
of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide
a canopy effect . The preliminary site plan provides planting
details concerning the location of five Chanticlear Pear
trees which are proposed to provide shade for the 17 parking
spaces . These trees exceed the minimum ratio of one tree for
each seven parking spaces .
Landscape islands require a minimum of three feet of width.
Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some
form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 6
landscape islands which vary between 10 and 18 feet in width.
Due to the location of the building and the size of these
planter areas the parking lot areas is effectively screened
from the view of adjoining street rights-of-way.
The landscape plan provides planter orientation in such a
manner that the proposed plantings can be protected from
damage by vehicles using the adjoining parking spaces .
Buffer Matrix: Section 18 . 100 . 130 contains the buffer matrix
to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening
to be installed between different types of land uses . A land
use buffer is not required because the adjoining properties
are not developed with existing non-conforming residential
uses .
Visual Clearance Areas : Section 18 . 102 requires that a clear
vision area be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of
a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area
shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall
structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding
three feet in height . The code provides that obstructions
which may be located in this area shall be visually clear
between three and eight feet in height . Trees may be placed
within this area provided all branches below eight feet are
removed.
A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by
measuring a 30 foot distance from the corner of two
intersecting street rights-of-way.
The clear vision rule also includes triangular areas on
either side of a proposed driveway. For driveways in excess
of 24 feet in width such as those proposed to serve this site
the clear vision area is measured a 30 foot distance back
from the driveway and 30 feet along the adjoining street
right-of-way and then connecting these two points . The plan
as proposed complies with these requirements both at the
intersection of SW 68th Street and SW Franklin Street and
within areas adjoining both driveways which are controlled by
the applicant.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18 . 106 requires a
minimum of one off-street parking space for each 350 square
feet of gross floor area. The floor plan of the structure
states that 4, 726 square feet of gross square footage is
proposed which requires a minimum of 14 parking spaces . A
total of 17 spaces have been provided with six spaces having
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 7
been sized as compact spaces and one space having been
designated as a Handicapped Accessible.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) : Revised
regulations became effective on January 26, 1992 . A minimum
of two disabled parking spaces are required if one to 25
parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides
one disabled person parking spaces which complies with the
total number of spaces required given the number of required
parking spaces . It is suggested that the handicapped parking
space be relocated to an area which is directly in front of
the main building entrance from the parking lot rather than
its current location some 45 feet to the south.
Bicycle Parking: Section 18 . 106 requires one bicycle parking
rack for each 15 required parking spaces in any commercial
development . Bicycle parking areas shall not be located
within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian
pathways. The current site plan does not show the provision
for a bicycle parking rack. The revised site plan shall
provide bicycle parking rack to serve this development
designed to serve a minimum of one bicycle . If possible the
bicycle rack should be located near a main building entrance
and under cover for ease of use .
Access : Section 18 . 108 . 080 states that commercial and
industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces
provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet of paved
width. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of two
access driveways onto SW 68th Street and SW Franklin Street
to serve both phases which are proposed to be developed. The
access provided is 30 feet in paved width thereby satisfying
this requirement . The Engineering Department has recommended
that a reciprocal access agreement be created for the
proposed common driveways on SW 68th and SW Franklin Street
frontages in order to reduce the need for a future driveways .
Walkways : Section 18 . 108 . 050 (A) requires that a walkway be
extended from the ground floor entrance of all new structures
to the street which provides the required ingress and egress .
The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in
which pedestrians must cross vehicle access driveways or
parking lots . Such crossings shall be designed and located
for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts . Required
walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle
traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum curbed
vertical separation or a minimum three foot horizontal
separation.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 8
Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted
for distances no greater than 36 feet when appropriate
pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are
used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in
width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such
as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts .
The current site plan provides a walkway to SW 68th Street
and a walkway to SW Franklin Street. The walkways as
designed do not require pedestrians to cross vehicular
driveways. The plan as designed complies with the
Development Code Standards for pedestrian access .
Signs : Section 18 . 114 lists the type of allowable signs and
sign area permitted in the C-P zone. All signage shall be
reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by
the Planning Division.
Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage : Section 18 . 116
requires that new construction incorporate functional and
adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection
of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable prior to
pick-up and removal by haulers . The minimum standard for the
type of development which has been proposed is four square
feet of storage area for each 1, 000 square feet of floor
area.
The current trash and recycling enclosures as proposed
complies with the minimum standards for size . It is
recommended that the applicant contact Mr. Lenny Hing with
pride Disposal at 625-6177, in order to review the design and
location of the proposed enclosure to ensure ease of optimal
daily site servicing issues .
Tree Removal : Section 18 . 150 . 020 (E) requires a permit for
removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in
diameter measured four feet above the ground level . The
applicant has proposed to remove eight trees in excess of six
inches in height as measured four feet above the existing
grade elevations . A permit for tree removal must comply with
the following criteria as specified in Section 18 . 150 . 030 (A) :
1. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property,
or interfere with utility service or traffic safety;
If preserved in place certain trees would interfere
with the construction of necessary site improvements
such as driveways, service areas and the industrial
buildings to be developed. Locating the proposed
development on alternate portions of the site is
difficult due to the limited size of the site and the
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 9
widely dispersed nature of the existing significant
trees on site. The site is relatively narrow in width
100 feet . To preserve trees substantial numbers of
trees would require that the site improvements be
greatly reduced in size.
2 . The trees have to be removed to construct proposed
improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant' s
property in a reasonable manner; See statement above.
3 . The trees are not needed to prevent erosion,
instability, or drainage problems; Due to the limited
slope of the property no unusual erosion problems,
slope instability or drainage problems are expected
either on-site or off-site with the removal of these
trees . The recommended conditions of approval included
a requirement that the applicant demonstrate that off-
site drainage will not adversely impact properties
which are upstream and downstream of the subject
property.
4 . The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as
windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and
open space; Due to the limited number of trees which
are to be removed it is not expected that the remaining
trees will be impacted. The site plan has been
required to be modified to comply with the landscape
percentage requirements or to upgrade plant materials
within the areas which are provided.
5 . The aesthetic character in the area will not be
visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and A
recent Forest Resources study for this area concluded
that this forested area would be a poor candidate for
preservation as a natural open space area. These
findings were based on the overall condition of the
trees and the development constraints of this area.
6 . New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will
replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. The
applicant has proposed new vegetation in excess of the
minimum standards required for a Commercial
Professional development site.
Based on these findings removal of the 30 to 40 trees shown
within the existing conditions plan complies with the
applicable criteria for tree removal . Prior to the issuance
of Building Permits the applicant is required to obtain a
tree removal permit from the .City.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 10
Transportation Planning Rule : The portion of the
Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8,
1994, that applies to this application is OAR 660-12-045 (4)
and (5) . This section states that new retail, office and
institutional buildings at or near existing or planned
transit stops to provide preferential access to transit
through the following measures :
a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop
or station;
b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and,
c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit
stops.
The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential
access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct,
safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by
removing other barriers to pedestrian access . Building
entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct,
safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development
and the transit stop.
New retail and office buildings located on transit streets
should have at least one public entrance facing the transit
street . If it is not possible to orient an entrance facing
the street the entrance shall be as close as possible to a
transit route. A combination of building orientation,
distance and pedestrian amenities are required to display the
main entrance and direct pedestrians to that entrance .
This site adjoins a Major Collector facility SW 68th Street .
This portion of SW 68th Street is not presently a transit
served facility. For this reason the proposed development is
not required to orient or locate the building structure
towards the SW 68th Street . The applicant has proposed to
locate the building towards both streets and has provided
pathway connections to the building which do not require
pedestrians to cross vehicular driveways to access the site .
If SW 68th Street became a transit served facility in the
future, the proposed design of this office is expected to
provide ease of access for pedestrians . It is suggested that
an additional building entrance be provided along the
building elevation facing SW 68th Street or SW Franklin
Street to provide a clearly marked pedestrian entrance to the
development .
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 11
SECTION IV. PROCEDURE
1 . Notice : Notice was published in the newspaper, posted
at City Hall and mailed to:
XX The applicant and owners
XX Owners of record within the required distance
XX Affected government agencies
2 . Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 8/23/95
UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
3 . Appeal : Any party to the decision may appeal this
decision in accordance with Section 18 . 32 . 290 (A) and
Section 18 . 32 . 370 of the Community Development Code
which provides that a written appeal must be filed with
the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given
and sent . Appeal fee schedule and forms are available
at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard,
Oregon.
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. 8/23/95
4 . Ouestions : If you have questions, please call City of
Tigard Planning Division (639-4171) , City of Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223
7-/-2 :1•64
PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts /DA
Associate Planner
< <-�u-� --' •••'/
APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdor f D E
Senior Planner
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 12
405W. Atftg/44147;414- frig'
". `I a. I m o . ,;- �
'y
k
,r
a.
kamminumirmimimmio
nIIIIIIMIPIIIIIIIIIIIihi
�� p
vim , \:- - gni
w ,
. ..
.. . • i
// rtrt ,
itg , .
. 't.' '. '. -1 1 11.4f/ ' Z '
Z
s ) .• i MUM?Wki > Q
L. .41tir 47,x,. ,, s• ♦ r ,
4 , yy o.
vt y Q
P' • • t 1 V
•
k 1;dQdb Y c I '�' .. !
LL I
�• - r'�•. .. r. 7y ,ate-
0
PLOT PLAN CASE NO.
EXHIBIT MAP SDR 95-0015
R(7T9 OFFT_C;L.s BUILDING
i A, _ .I �.�"SE'S, ^1 • 7,77 s
a _ = _
y� E9 _ _
11 i °vs lit
\..k..-4.._ PFAFFLE g �r '
C P wo. i/ ILANTA ST
,�c �l r■■ .n• 1 Es Vill Pull
,,,„„„,,,.0:1 2 1.. E- 8 ' .�2 a., My ow SI so
r 36 oiyhi i
_11 -1-- cu`° PHIS N T A I,Z NI��p•
he% .-- •:::Li±i •-, •. .a 1111 . ' I
; ''/ ,,, . . .
No ) ' ; '. Ai -. ,
..... ,
•..•,:• • .. .
E 6,173"7 . • =C G .. z
. , .....,., :_. : ..
h--i , - - ., . ,
-- ' 1 1 NIL . I z
----; nifir , -: ,... ...- . \ .,.. ‘. ,' '..,/ ,, . iii .
.....,_.
1 og...„4„ /.... ,, . a Irt, ..1puri ,M- tg, _....
< I
ST / r oftemi&Ter... marimi , ....1 1
5 *40p40■_1 • ,:• ,... '
b• ,, i
MIN' 44 ELEMENTARII■-■■ S i -=� a
• ! NAmInoN I —r-.. CC
E-32
rilow
J
;c;ss. MEM I 1 1 311 I
gi Mil El ..... Mffilik
I MMEM 1 p
ki 02
--....1/4,‘ ..
a INF ,___i eiv . AI"
NV I I I I�T ID V
i A CASE NO.
I
EXHIBIT. MAP ig
I SDR 95-0015
ROTH OFFICE BUILDING !
I
REQUEST
FOR
COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS EIVED PLANNING
Jul_ 2 01995 CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 OREGON
TO: Dave Scott, Building Official
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ► The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_>/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting: \N SLR
Phone Number: 31\
SDR 95-0015 July 10,1995
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR MINIU SI'
JUL 181995
hf
CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 OREGON
TO: Development Service Technicians, Community Development
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ► The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
✓ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting:
Phone Number:
SDR 95.0015 July 10,1995
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR COMMENffP '`--D PLANNING
JUL 17 7995
CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 OREGON
TO: Brian Moore, Portland General Electric
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ► The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting: 1 -
Phone Number:
SDR 95-0015 July 10,1995
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
• REL £D PLANNING
1 8(� 1^y 95 CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 JUL u OREGON
TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Department
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ► The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below: �n ^
�V
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting:
Phone Number:
SDR 95.0015 July 10,1995
J.T.ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM
TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT
TO: Mark Roberts
FROM: Kelley Jennings/Crime Prevention Specialist 1,
DATE: July 17, 1995
SUBJECT: SDR 95-0015 for J.T. Roth Office Building
Mark-
I have looked at the proposed SDR. I have reviewed the plans but cannot find the proposed exterior
lighting specifications. I did see the proposed location for the West sideof the building but nothing
for the South side near the doorway. I also need to see the proposed parking lot lightong plan before
I can sign off on this proposal.The landscaping plan is satsifactory.
•
ZEQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING
U. ,J 1995CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 �`11.�JJ OREGON
TO: Jim Wieskamp, General Telephone Engineering Department
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ► The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
0 E C:._LoPER -7-0 Pkov(+3E coNbocr -co 67-E's SPaccFccA-`torts
(Please provide the following information) ll
Name of Person Commenting: Qa
Phone Number: (a ?_0-5943 _
SDR 95-0015 July 10,1995
J T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
nr.CEIVED PLANNING
,a11��IJ
CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995
AUG 15 1995 OREGON
TO: Lee Walker, Unified Sewerage Agency/SWM Program
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ► The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
—
(Please provide the following information)
ALt
Name of Person Commenting:
Phone Number: q `i $ ' La 7
SDR 95-0015 July 10,1995
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Mark Roberts August 3, 1995
FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer 14
RE: SDR 95-0015 J. T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
Description:
The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to construct a
4, 726 sft office building at the southwest corner of SW 68th Parkway and
SW Franklin Street . The site consists of Tax Lot 2S1 01AA 8200 with an
area of 0 .34 ac.
Findings :
1 . STREETS :
The site is contiguous to SW 68th Parkway, which is classified as
a Major Collector street on the Comprehensive Plan, and SW Franklin
Street, a local street, and is located within the Tigard Triangle
planning area. The site plan shows a driveway to SW Franklin Street
and a joint use driveway onto SW 68th Parkway, combined with the
property to the south.
The existing SW 68th Parkway right-of-way is 30 feet from center
line and no further dedications are required. SW 68th Parkway has
been improved with curbs and pavement. The applicant should be
required to construct sidewalk along this frontage, together with
the new driveway construction. In addition, the applicant shall
provide a joint use and maintenance agreement for the common
driveway.
The existing SW Franklin Street right-of-way is also 30 feet from
center line . The roadway was partly constructed in 1995 with a 2/3
street improvement with the development of the Louie Photography
Studio on the property located across from the site, on the
northerly side of the street. The applicant should complete the
improvement of SW Franklin to City Standards and construct a new
curb at 17 feet from centerline, together with the un-completed
pavement and utilities to join the existing construction.
Overhead utilities are existing on the southerly side of SW Franklin
Street and the poles are being utilized for the street lighting
system. No additional street lighting is required for SW Franklin
Street. The applicant has indicated that the overhead facilities
will be placed underground as a part of the street construction.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BLDG PAGE 1
2 . SANITARY SEWER:
The site is currently served by the 8 inch public sanitary sewer
line that is located in SW 68th Parkway. The existing sewer has
sufficient capacity for this project.
3 . STORM SEWER:
The site slopes in a southwesterly direction towards the adjacent
un-developed property. The applicant proposes to grade the parking
lot and site to a new underground on-site drainage system that will
connect to the existing system in SW 68th Parkway. The applicant
shall prepare a hydrology and hydraulic study to determine if the
existing system has sufficient capacity and is not unduly affected
by the additional runoff from the site.
The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed
to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management
Regulations requiring the construction of on-site water quality
facilities or fees in-lieu of their construction. Section 7 . 10b of
the above noted Resolution and Order cites conditions under which
the fee in-lieu may be accepted. Specifically, it provides, that
if, "The site is small compared to the development plan, and the
loss of area for the on-site facility would preclude the effective
development . ", the fee may apply. It is our opinion that this site
is consistent with this criteria, and we recommend that a fee in-
lieu be required.
Recommendations :
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED:
1 . Standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk,
driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer,
and storm drainage shall be installed along the SW Franklin Street
frontage. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to local
street standards and shall conform to the alignment of existing
adjacent improvements or to an alignment approved by the Engineering
Department .
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639-4171) .
2 . The applicant shall construct sidewalk along the frontage of SW 68th
Parkway and a new common driveway. The underground storm drain
connection to the existing system shall be included in the public
improvement plans .
3 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile
construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to
the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and
one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a
Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0015 J:T. ROTH OFFICE BLDG PAGE 2
approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required
by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to
public improvements .
STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639-4171) .
4 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the guidelines
of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47 . NOTE:
This is a two part fee which is paid at different times. The first
part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for
that portion of the development which increases the impervious area
within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building
Permit issuance which is for each individual lot.
5 . A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded
on City standard forms for all common driveways . The agreement
shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel
Deeds . The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering
Department prior to recording.
STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department (639-4171) .
6 . The applicant shall place the overhead facilities along SW Franklin
Street underground or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding.
7 . The applicant shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations
prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer for the proposed storm
drain system.
8 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be
discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly
impacting properties downstream.
STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639-4171) .
IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF
THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST
1 . SECTION 18 . 160 . 170 Improvement Agreement
A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the
Applicant (subdivider) shall:
1 . Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer
specifying the period within which all required
improvements and repairs shall be completed; and
2 . Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is
not completed within the period specified, the City may
complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses
from the applicant.
B. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as
may be required to be paid and may also provide for the
construction of the improvements in stages and for the
extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in
the contract.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BLDG PAGE 3
2 . SECTION 18 . 120 . 060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES
A. On all projects where public improvements are required the
Director shall:
1 . Require a bond in an amount not grater than 100 percent
of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval
of the site development plan in order to ensure the
completed project is in conformance with the approved
plan; and
2 . Approve and release such bonds.
B. The bond shall be release when the Director finds the
completed project conforms to the approved site development
plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied.
3 . SECTION 18 . 164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS.
Section 18 . 164 . 180 Notice to City Required
Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in
advance . If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not
be resumed until the City is notified.
APPROVED: VZ v L"
Randall R. Woo le , City Engineer
n:\engineer\sdr95-15.mja
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BLDG PAGE 4
REQUEST FOR COMMENT, RECEIVED PLANNING
JUL 141995 CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 OREGON
TO: Michael Miller, Water Department
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ■ The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
1 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
PLEASE 0,014T4c,T Tuauar(AI VA y L4.JA-L PL 1D,STUc-r Fug. 0.0/
piQl1}ELT E?/713J 714'5 LG � A/ 7: //i?PAc%T .61a1 � /37f t/Cv L(TIC N7cx_
51au/JC_ T BE / W Vi067, 13Y TV WO.
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting: Mike- nu-46Z-
Phone Number: x 345
SDR 95-0015 July 10, 1995
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAVREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
08/01/95 12:45 $503 526 2538 TV FIRE MARSHAL Z003/004
REQUEST FOR COMMEN1
4'
CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 OREGON
JUL 1 3 1995
TO: Fire Marshall
FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING • The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter. 7
Written comments provided below: 7-
di WA/MI .413D _0 ) a-ei)
• (p -4)' L, T (31r- Pb J 4 i
/•_ _. - 4Lc
(Please provide the following inforrnationJ
Name of Person Commenting: $ ti / 4 L tnic ' ,« ,!-r�
Phone Number: / ,$az -a �L
-)// s-
soR 95-0a15 July 10,1995
J.T, ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAUREOuEST FOR COMMENTS
EQUEST FOR COMMENTS
A
CITY OF TIGARD
DATE: July 11, 1995 OREGON
TO: Per Attached
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ► The
applicant requests approval to develop a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest
corner of SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. ZONE: Commercial
Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development
Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,
18.150 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information
supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report
and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future.
If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday -July 21, 1995.
You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments
and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard
Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting:
Phone Number:
SDR 95-0015 July 10,1995
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS
cf67-oo 15"
:EQUEST FOR COMMENT
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS
{circle one}
CIT Area: (N) (S) (B (C) •• Placed for review in Library CIT Book •• _CPO NO.
CITY DEPARTMENTS
BLDG. DEPTJDave Scott, 91d0.OMda1 `-!P E DEPTJKeII Jennings
PE IONS/John Acker, Marn.spvsr.
_CITY ADMIN./Cathy Wheatley, atrRCOr
EyG bEPTJMichael Anderson, De�.Review Eng. .DEV. DEPTJD.S.T.'S
ADV. PLNGJCarol Landsman, senior Planner ATER DEPT./Michael Miller, operations mgr.
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
L—FIRE MARSHALL UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER 01ST.
Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745
Wa. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97075
(pick-up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124
AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS
WA.CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES
150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. #16, Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's)
Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue
Portland, OR 97232-2736
_Brent Curtis (CPA's) _STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION
_Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ODOT/REGION 1
_Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning
_Scott King (CPA's) Portland, OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders
_Tom Harry (Current Planning App's) Portland, OR 97209-4037
_Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD (CPA's/ZOA's)
1175 Court Street, N.E. _OTHER
_CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem, OR 97310-0590
Larry Conrad, Senior Planner _CITY OF PORTLAND
PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM Planning Director
Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th
PO Box 23483 Portland, OR 97204
CITY OF KING CITY Tigard, OR 97281-3483
City Manager _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
15300 SW 116th _CITY OF TUALATIN City Manager
King City, OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369
Tualatin, OR 97062 Lake Oswego, OR 97034
SPECIAL AGENCIES
GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO.
Jim Wieskamp, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone
PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court
Tigard, OR 97281-3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, OR 97005
_NW NATURAL CAS CO. Phone.isos 721-244a _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS 1 1--Ii ET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT
Scott Palmer Pax 15031 721-2502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox, Project Planner
220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street
Portland, OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland, OR 97232
Beaverton, OR 97006-4886
_TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO.
Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney, PLS-Project Eng.
3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave., Room 324
Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Union Station
Portland, OR 97209
STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES
_AERONAUTICS DIVISION (ODOT) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _US POSTAL SERVICE
_COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H. PARK FISH & WILDLIFE Randy Hammock, Growth Cord.
_PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station
DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland, OR 97229-9998
U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS
OTHER
❑90Q10'.paCCVV Wlotic rttst
MAILING
RECORDS
4,, . .
• CITY OF TIGARD
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington )ss.
City of Tigard )
I,Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath,depose and say:
That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon.
That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
X That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR:
X City of Tigard Planning Director
Tigard Planning Commission
Tigard Hearings Officer
Tigard City Council
A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER
of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s)
shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 10th day of August, 1995; said NOTICE
OF PUBLIC HEARING/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER as hereto attached,
was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the 10th day of August, 1995 and deposited in the
United States Mail on the 10th day of August,1995,postage prepaid.
/, ...0..- Arlir..4)" ''''''' -
/ ,
(Prepared Notice) i
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I day of_11), 19 %�
Cit;ivvi, 1K .•40,,Sig
f���, OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUB�i F OREGON
- -- DIANE M JELDERKS
t', - NOTARY PUBLIC.OREGON
V,if/ COMMISSION NO 046142 My Commission Expires:
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999
SDR 95-0015 NOTICE OF DECISION BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
J.T.ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0015
ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
APPLICATION: The applicant requests site development review
approval to allow construction of a 4, 726 square foot office
building. Zone : C-P (Commercial Professional) . Location: 12500
SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200) . The site is located
at the south west corner of SW Franklin Street and SW 68th Street
SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning
Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request
subject to the following Conditions of Approval . The findings and
conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section
II .
Conditions of Approval :
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED:
1 . Standard half-street improvements, including concrete
sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement,
sanitary sewer, and storm drainage shall be installed along
the SW Franklin Street frontage. Improvements shall be
designed and constructed to local street standards and shall
conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements or
to an alignment approved by the Engineering Department .
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department.
2 . The applicant shall construct sidewalk along the frontage of
SW 68th Parkway and a new common driveway. The underground
storm drain connection to the existing system shall be
included in the public improvement plans.
3 . Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and
profile construction drawings shall be submitted for
preliminary review to the Engineering Department . Seven (7)
sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction
cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall
be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans
are in addition to any drawings required by the Building
Division and should only include sheets relevant to public
improvements . STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering
Department .
4 . The applicant shall pay the fees as established under the
guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 1
No. 91-47 . NOTE : This is a two part fee which is paid at
different times . The first part is paid with any associated
public improvements which is for that portion of the
development which increases the impervious area within the
public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building
Permit issuance which is for each individual lot .
5 . A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and
recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways .
The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all
applicable parcel Deeds . The agreement shall be approved by
the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF
CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department .
6 . The applicant shall place the overhead facilities along SW
Franklin Street underground or pay the fee in-lieu of
undergrounding.
7 . The applicant shall provide hydrology and hydraulic
calculations prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer for
the proposed storm drain system.
8 . The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff
can be discharged into the existing drainageways without
significantly impacting properties downstream. STAFF
CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department .
9 . Revised site/landscape plans and studies shall be submitted
for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact : Mark
Roberts, Planning Division
The revisions shall address the following:
a . Provision of a minimum of one bicycle rack with a
minimum of one bicycle parking space. The bicycle rack
shall be located near or adjoining a main building
entrance, preferably under cover.
b. Obtain a tree removal permit .
c . Provide a copy of the site plan for review and approval
by the franchised hauler review. STAFF CONTACT: Lenny
Hing, Pride Disposal (625-6177) .
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE
OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS :
10 . All site improvements shall be installed and maintained
pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans . STAFF
CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 2
THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE
DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION.
SECTION II . FINDINGS OF FACT
1 . Background:
The subject property is presently undeveloped. The site is
thickly grown with trees and undergrowth.
2 . Vicinity Information:
The site is located on the south west corner of SW Franklin
Street and SW 68th Street . The property has been zoned C-P
(Commercial Professional) since the Comprehensive Plan was
acknowledged. The adjoining properties to the site are also
zoned C-P. Properties to the north, south and east are
developed with professional office uses or with the Landmark
Ford Dealership. The property to the west of the site is
presently undeveloped.
3 . Site Information and Proposal Description:
The site has street frontage on SW 68th Street and SW
Franklin Street . The site measures 100 by 150 feet . The
site slopes approximately eight feet in grade from a high
point towards SW Franklin and SW 68th to the south west .
4 . Other Staff Comments :
The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and
provided the following findings :
Findings :
STREETS:
The site is contiguous to SW 68th Parkway, which is
classified as a Major Collector street on the Comprehensive
Plan, and SW Franklin Street, a local street, and is located
within the Tigard Triangle Planning Area. The site plan
shows a driveway to SW Franklin Street and a joint use
driveway onto SW 68th Parkway, combined with the property to
the south.
The existing SW 68th Parkway right-of-way is 30 feet from
center line and no further dedications are required. SW 68th
Parkway has been improved with curbs and pavement . The
applicant should be required to construct sidewalk along this
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 3
frontage, together with the new driveway construction. In
addition, the applicant shall provide a joint use and
• maintenance agreement for the common driveway.
The existing SW Franklin Street right-of-way is also 30 feet
from center line . The roadway was partly constructed in 1995
with a 2/3 street improvement with the development of the
Louie Photography Studio on the property located across from
the site, on the northerly side of the street . The applicant
should complete the improvement of SW Franklin to City
Standards and construct a new curb at 17 feet from
centerline, together with the unfinished pavement and
utilities to join the existing construction.
Overhead utilities are existing on the southerly side of SW
Franklin Street and the poles are being utilized for the
street lighting system. No additional street lighting is
required for SW Franklin Street . The applicant has indicated
that the overhead facilities will be placed underground as a
part of the street construction.
SANITARY SEWER:
The site is currently served by the eight inch public
sanitary sewer line that is located in SW 68th Parkway. The
existing sewer has sufficient capacity for this project .
STORM SEWER:
The site slopes in a southwesterly direction towards the
adjacent undeveloped property. The applicant proposes to
grade the parking lot and site to a new underground on-site
drainage system that will connect to the existing system in
SW 68th Parkway. The applicant shall prepare a hydrology and
hydraulic study to determine if the existing system has
sufficient capacity and is not unduly affected by the
additional runoff from the site.
The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has
agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface
Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of
on-site water quality facilities or fees in-lieu of their
construction. Section 7 . 10b of the above noted Resolution
and Order cites conditions under which the fee in-lieu may be
accepted. Specifically, it provides, that if, "The site is
small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area
for the on-site facility would preclude the effective
development. " , the fee may apply. It is our opinion that
this site is consistent with this criteria, and we recommend
that a fee in-lieu be required.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 4
Agency Comments :
The Tualatin Valley Fire District reviewed this application
and provided the following comments concerning this
development :
1) Provide fire flow calculations for the building. Submit
plans to the Fire District to perform this review.
2) A fire hydrant shall be placed no more than 250 feet from
all portions of the building.
3) Emergency vehicle access appears to have been met .
No other comments have been received.
SECTION III . ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS :
Use Classification: The subject property is zoned Commercial
Professional (C-P) . The applicant is proposing to develop
vacant property with a professional office building. The
professional office use is the primary permitted use for
property within this zoning district as provided in Section
18 . 64 (Commercial Professional) and as further defined in
Section 18 .42 (Use Classifications) .
Minimum Lot Area : Section 18 . 64 the Commercial Professional
Zoning District states that there is a minimum lot area
requirement of 6 , 000 square feet . The site is approximately
. 34 acres or 15, 000 square feet which is in excess of the
minimum requirement . The average parcel width required
within the Commercial Professional Zoning District is 50
feet . The site has an average width of approximately 100
feet which exceeds the standard.
Setback and Height : Section 18 . 64 . 050 states that there is
no front, side or rear yard setbacks . Except that clear
vision area and parking lot screening requirements must be
met . These standards are reviewed elsewhere within this
report . The building as proposed comply with the Special
Setback requirement which is 30 feet from the centerline of
SW 68th Street . The building is proposed to be located 33
feet from the centerline of SW 68th Street .
The maximum allowed building height is 45 feet in the
Commercial Professional Zoning District . The proposed
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 5
buildings would not exceed a maximum height of approximately
21 feet in compliance with the maximum height standard.
Landscaping Plan: Section 18 . 100 requires that the applicant
submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a
minimum of 15% of the site . The C-P zone allows a maximum of
85% of the site to be covered with buildings and impervious
surfaces . The applicant has submitted a plan indicating the
type and location of landscaping to be provided. This plan
proposes 85% lot coverage with 15% of the site to be
developed with landscaping which complies with landscape
development standards .
.Street Trees : Section 18 . 100 . 035 states that all development
projects fronting on a public street shall be required to
plant street trees. Section 18 . 100 . 035 requires that street
trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the
size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or
large) .
The site has approximately 140 feet of frontage along SW 68th
Street which is available from planting. The landscape plan
indicates that a total of four new Norway Maple trees would
be provided at a spacing of approximately 35 feet on center.
The site has approximately 75 feet of frontage on SW Franklin
Street . Two Norway Maple trees would be provided also at a
spacing of 35 feet on center on the SW Franklin Street
frontage. Based on their large size at maturity these trees
satisfy the street tree planting requirement .
Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18 . 100 . 110 (A)
requires the screening of parking and loading areas .
Landscaped parking areas shall include special design
features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from
view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a
relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and
trees .
Trees shall also be planted in landscaped islands in all
parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis
of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide
a canopy effect . The preliminary site plan provides planting
details concerning the location of five Chanticlear Pear
trees which are proposed to provide shade for the 17 parking
spaces. These trees exceed the minimum ratio of one tree for
each seven parking spaces.
Landscape islands require a minimum of three feet of width.
Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some
form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 6
landscape islands which vary between 10 and 18 feet in width.
Due to the location of the building and the size of these
planter areas the parking lot areas is effectively screened
from the view of adjoining street rights-of-way.
The landscape plan provides planter orientation in such a
manner that the proposed plantings can be protected from
damage by vehicles using the adjoining parking spaces .
Buffer Matrix: Section 18 . 100 . 130 contains the buffer matrix
to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening
to be installed between different types of land uses . A land
use buffer is not required because the adjoining properties
are not developed with existing non-conforming residential
uses .
Visual Clearance Areas : Section 18 . 102 requires that a clear
vision area be maintained on the corners of all property
adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of
a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area
shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall
structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding
three feet in height . The code provides that obstructions
which may be located in this area shall be visually clear
between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed
within this area provided all branches below eight feet are
removed.
A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by
measuring a 30 foot distance from the corner of two
intersecting street rights-of-way.
The clear vision rule also includes triangular areas on
either side of a proposed driveway. For driveways in excess
of 24 feet in width such as those proposed to serve this site
the clear vision area is measured a 30 foot distance back
from the driveway and 30 feet along the adjoining street
right-of-way and then connecting these two points . The plan
as proposed complies with these requirements both at the
intersection of SW 68th Street and SW Franklin Street and
within areas adjoining both driveways which are controlled by
the applicant .
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18 . 106 requires a
minimum of one off-street parking space for each 350 square
feet of gross floor area. The floor plan of the structure
states that 4, 726 square feet of gross square footage is
proposed which requires a minimum of 14 parking spaces . A
total of 17 spaces have been provided with six spaces having
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 7
been sized as compact spaces and one space having been
designated as a Handicapped Accessible.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) : Revised
regulations became effective on January 26, 1992 . A minimum
of two disabled parking spaces are required if one to 25
parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides
one disabled person parking spaces which complies with the
total number of spaces required given the number of required
parking spaces . It is suggested that the handicapped parking
space be relocated to an area which is directly in front of
the main building entrance from the parking lot rather than
its current location some 45 feet to the south.
Bicycle Parking: Section 18 . 106 requires one bicycle parking
rack for each 15 required parking spaces in any commercial
development . Bicycle parking areas shall not be located
within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian
pathways. The current site plan does not show the provision
for a bicycle parking rack. The revised site plan shall
provide bicycle parking rack to serve this development
designed to serve a minimum of one bicycle. If possible the
bicycle rack should be located near a main building entrance
and under cover for ease of use.
Access : Section 18 .108 . 080 states that commercial and
industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces
provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet of paved
width. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of two
access driveways onto SW 68th Street and SW Franklin Street
to serve both phases which are proposed to be developed. The
access provided is 30 feet in paved width thereby satisfying
this requirement . The Engineering Department has recommended
that a reciprocal access agreement be created for the
proposed common driveways on SW 68th and SW Franklin Street
frontages in order to reduce the need for a future driveways.
Walkways: Section 18 . 108 . 050 (A) requires that a walkway be
extended from the ground floor entrance of all new structures
to the street which provides the required ingress and egress.
The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in
which pedestrians must cross vehicle access driveways or
parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located
for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts . Required
walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle
traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum curbed
vertical separation or a minimum three foot horizontal
separation.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 8
Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted
for distances no greater than 36 feet when appropriate
pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are
used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in
width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such
as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts.
The current site plan provides a walkway to SW 68th Street
and a walkway to SW Franklin Street . The walkways as
designed do not require pedestrians to cross vehicular
driveways. The plan as designed complies with the
Development Code Standards for pedestrian access.
Signs : Section 18 . 114 lists the type of allowable signs and
sign area permitted in the C-P zone. All signage shall be
reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by
the Planning Division.
Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18 . 116
requires that new construction incorporate functional and
adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection
of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable prior to
pick-up and removal by haulers . The minimum standard for the
type of development which has been proposed is four square
feet of storage area for each 1, 000 square feet of floor
area.
The current trash and recycling enclosures as proposed
complies with the minimum standards for size . It is
recommended that the applicant contact Mr. Lenny Hing with
pride Disposal at 625-6177, in order to review the design and
location of the proposed enclosure to ensure ease of optimal
daily site servicing issues .
Tree Removal : Section 18 . 150 . 020 (E) requires a permit for
removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in
diameter measured four feet above the ground level . The
applicant has proposed to remove eight trees in excess of six
inches in height as measured four feet above the existing
grade elevations . A permit for tree removal must comply with
the following criteria as specified in Section 18 . 150 . 030 (A) :
1. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property,
or interfere with utility service or traffic safety;
If preserved in place certain trees would interfere
with the construction of necessary site improvements
such as driveways, service areas and the industrial
buildings to be developed. Locating the proposed
development on alternate portions of the site is
difficult due to the limited size of the site and the
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 9
widely dispersed nature of the existing significant
trees on site. The site is relatively narrow in width
100 feet . To preserve trees substantial numbers of
trees would require that the site improvements be
greatly reduced in size.
2 . The trees have to be removed to construct proposed
improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant' s
property in a reasonable manner; See statement above .
3 . The trees are not needed to prevent erosion,
instability, or drainage problems; Due to the limited
slope of the property no unusual erosion problems,
slope instability or drainage problems are expected
either on-site or off-site with the removal of these
trees. The recommended conditions of approval included
a requirement that the applicant demonstrate that off-
site drainage will not adversely impact properties
which are upstream and downstream of the subject
property.
4 . The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as
windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and
open space; Due to the limited number of trees which
are to be removed it is not expected that the remaining
trees will be impacted. The site plan has been
required to be modified to comply with the landscape
percentage requirements or to upgrade plant materials
within the areas which are provided.
5. The aesthetic character in the area will not be
visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and A
recent Forest Resources study for this area concluded
that this forested area would be a poor candidate for
preservation as a natural open space area. These
findings were based on the overall condition of the
trees and the development constraints of this area.
6 . New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will
replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. The
applicant has proposed new vegetation in excess of the
minimum standards required for a Commercial
Professional development site.
Based on these findings removal of the 30 to 40 trees shown
within the existing conditions plan complies with the
applicable criteria for tree removal. Prior to the issuance
of Building Permits the applicant is required to obtain a
tree removal permit from the City.
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 10
Transportation Planning Rule : The portion of the
• Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8,
1994 , that applies to this application is OAR 660-12-045 (4)
and (5) . This section states that new retail, office and
institutional buildings at or near existing or planned
transit stops to provide preferential access to transit
through the following measures:
a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop
or station;
b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and,
c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit
stops.
The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential
access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct,
safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by
removing other barriers to pedestrian access . Building
entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct,
safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development
and the transit stop.
New retail and office buildings located on transit streets
should have at least one public entrance facing the transit
street . If it is not possible to orient an entrance facing
the street the entrance shall be as close as possible to a
transit route. A combination of building orientation,
distance and pedestrian amenities are required to display the
main entrance and direct pedestrians to that entrance.
This site adjoins a Major Collector facility SW 68th Street .
This portion of SW 68th Street is not presently a transit
served facility. For this reason the proposed development is
not required to orient or locate the building structure
towards the SW 68th Street . The applicant has proposed to
locate the building towards both streets and has provided
pathway connections to the building which do not require
pedestrians to cross vehicular driveways to access the site.
If SW 68th Street became a transit served facility in the
future, the proposed design of this office is expected to
provide ease of access for pedestrians. It is suggested that
an additional building entrance be provided along the
building elevation facing SW 68th Street or SW Franklin
Street to provide a clearly marked pedestrian entrance to the
development .
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 11
SECTION IV. PROCEDURE
1 . Notice : Notice was published in the newspaper, posted
at City Hall and mailed to:
XX The applicant and owners
XX Owners of record within the required distance
XX Affected government agencies
2 . Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 8/23/95
UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
3 . Appeal : Any party to the decision may appeal this
decision in accordance with Section 18 . 32 .290 (A) and
Section 18 . 32 .370 of the Community Development Code
which provides that a written appeal must be filed with
the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given
and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available
at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard,
Oregon.
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 p.m. 8/23/95
4 . Ouestions: If you have questions, please call City of
Tigard Planning Division (639-4171) , City of Tigard
City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 97223
10(4,e,4 /elgat: .=„3- ‹2; 93-
PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DA
Associate Planner
APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo D E
Senior Planner
NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0015 - ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 12
_._.____________._._..4ta ID .
•
4ww, = Iv . .- ..- ..
_ _ • .._ _. , _ • •-' - %-i
:� it . I . - .. -/' , k.- .. a
,,;• r yyi�pp 1
0
,k . :,,... ..:.
' + : f, V•,1 •,.. i "` i ..-:V.23141 ,. IIr v". _.• Q
t' f '.►
, ..,..iii..... ,, .04,4***44.: , ..,„ .,
.f.
U
PLOT PLAN CASE NO.
EXHIBIT MAP sDR 95-0015
ROTH OFF .CU HUILDING
• . ,mer. .9 =. J , /
VIZI == pal
— s r is 0 -.y C II
�
! i -
:' t' FAFFLE �'r'dI�, 1\,
,'.�
TLANTA ST NEI 0 !Tic .
� „rim ��. i yea .mom al on iir
Ellill MI k r
UJ
Pm."
, p ♦ 1. ..1 _. _ ■1 D
—�i
1111 in
it - _ + 0
rGARDEN F w- Z
A a
z r , -C--7G . z
a
. . A
iE!ILtj ::Elm
J4L si ST a.
� HIL LEWI: Mffili
LEMENTA '■
Q
11111111/5.17. T 4-- 8
.V4Ip. ^ Ea•TON I ttt■-3, 4 N Q CC
whik
CA
1E Ill z
=s 1111
E��.■�t■t ■I \ FKNY
111111 It I
UM
•-:•.. - .od ,.: . ..4,-,.. .
�� ������ mil► ■�� O
..„
I—PCB ,Niime =non
. 'k : ' \ a w e
�.�u',� z EN �miI� i—a Ili1Ti
Z
. . \
111.11 P 0
VICINITY CASE NO.
EXHIBIT MAP SDR 95-0015
ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
SDR 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFTCE BUILDING (Page 1 of 2)
41010
2S101AA-03901 211A-04000 EXHIBIT
CARPENTER, RICHARD L NORTHLAND HOMES INC
BY DONALD E POLLOCK 1834 SW 58TH #202
1834 SW 58TH #202 PORTLAND OR 97201
PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-04200 2S101AA-04300
POLLOCK, DONALD E & LANDMARK FORD IN
' CARPENTER, RICH PO BOX
1834 SW #202 OR 97281
PO ND OR 97221
2S101AA-04500 2S101AA-04900
LOUIE, RICHARD C AND ROTH, JACOB T JR
CHANG, DARCY N K Y 12540 SW 68TH PARKWAY #B
8860 SW BOMAR CT TIGARD OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
2S101AA-05200 2S101AA-05500
LANDMARK FORD INC CORLISS, JAMES L & CORA-E--
PO BOX 23970 PO BOX -
TIGARD OR 97281 TI-GARD OR 97281
2S101AA-05700 2S101AA-06400
CORLISS, JAMES L & CORA K TING, ELON & SYLVIA
PO BOX 23970 BY WILLIAM R SOUTHARD
TIGARD OR 97281 9817 NE 54TH ST, STE 105
VANCOUVER WA 98662
2S101AA-06700 2S101AA-07100
OREGON STATE BAR WARDIN, MARION E &
1776 SW MADISON STREET WARDIN, ILA J
PORTLAND OR 97205 PO BOX 53
NEWBERG OR 97132
2S101AA-07600 2S101AA-07700
WILHELM, MICHAEL W ROTH, JACOB T JR & T ' =- -'7--
12540 SW 68TH AVE 12540 SW 6: - . ' #B
TIGARD OR 97223 T - • - ' OR 97223
2S101AA-07800 2S101AA-07900
ANDREWS, NELLIE B ROTH, JACOB T & THERESA A
12485 SW 67TH 12520 SW 68TH PARKWAY
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
2S101AA-08100 2S101AA-08200
FUEGY, ALLEN AND RAYMOND DENTON, MICHAEL JR
12480 SW 68TH PKWY SUITE A PO BOX 1768
TIGARD OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035
2S101AA-08300 2S101AA-08500
POLLOCK, DONALD E & POLLOCK, MICHAEL E
CARPENTER, RICHARD - 1834 SW 58TH AVE #202
1834 SW 5: 02 PORTLAND OR 97221
• `D OR 97221
SDR 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING (Page 2 of 2)
41011
2S101AA-08600 2S101AA-08700
PEIRCE, STEPHEN W AND POLLOCK, MICHAEL
LYNN L 1834 •VE #202
12525 SW 68TH •s - LAND OR 97221
TIGARD OR 97223
2S101AA-08800 2S101AA-08900
POLLOCK, ROGER M POLLOCK, ELIZABETH G
' 1834 SW 58TH AVE #202 1834 SW 58TH AVE #202
PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-09000 . . 2S101AA-09001
NORTHLAND HOMES INC_ POLLOCK, DONALD E/JULIA GAIL
1834 SW -- 1834 SW 58TH #202
P ND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-09003 2S101AA-09100
POLLOCK, ROGER M POLLOCK, DONALD E
1834 SW 58 - 82 1834 SW : E 202
Ps " A• ` D OR 97221 Pe '" M►•ND OR 97221
2 S 101AA-0 9101 2S101AA-09004
KINDRICK, ALFRED F POLLOCK, ROGER M,_
DIANNE M 1834 SW AVE #202
12560 SW 70TH AVE AND OR 97221
TIGARD OR 97223
MICHAEL DENTON JR.
P.O. BOX 1768
LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035
pv- , ,t 0/d
� l� Li/q/q5
.1,/6,,e .„,j
- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY
CASE NO. S-Z k' `f5--O 0 I __
OTHER CASE NO'S: 1/1 i
RECEIPT NO. C15 Z 0471
z
APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY• Sr-rz L( il-e,Eilgr-
DATE: 6E-L///1675;
1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application el ts submitted:
PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 12500 Block od S.W. 68th J(A) Application form (1)
Parkway (S.W. ccrner of 68th and Franklin) ] f ,Z(B) Owner's signature/written
TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. WCTM 2S1 O1AA tax lots authorization
5,6,7,8,35,36
L//(C) Title transfer instrument (1)
SITE SIZE 15,000 sq.ft. (D) Assessor's map (1)
PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Michael Denton, Jr. /(E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist)
ADDRESS PO Box 1768 PHONE �F) Applicant's statement
CITY Lake Oswego, Or. ZIP 97035
(pre-app checklist)
1PPLICANT* J.T. Roth, Jr. ---1-6) List of property owners and
ADDRESS 12540 SW 68th Prkwy #B PHONE 629-2639 addresses within-250 - (1)
CITY Tigard, Or. ZIP 97223 L/(H) Filing fee ($ 15S69 )
*When the owner and the applicant are different ■ I) Construction os Estimate
people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record
or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETE NED 0 BE COMPLETE:
from the owner or an agent of the owner with written G _ c7 q 5
authorization. The owner(s) must sign this
application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE:
submit a written authorization with this application.
COMP. SIGNATION:
2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY y/ -77-6 c__(/.--, c i--)
The owners of record of the ject property ,� , -
request site development r iew approval to r: S` —allow construction of a side 5000sf office
ccmmercial building along with on-site imporvements Approval Date:
including parking area and landscaping.
Final Approval Date:
Planning
Engineering
0524P/13P
Rev'd 5/87
3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions
to be considered as part of this application: ncne
4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments
described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this
application.
5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be
attached to or imposed upon the subject property.
B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights
granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and
limitations of the approval.
C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,
attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the
applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this
application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are
false.
D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including
the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving
or denying the application.
DATED this 19th day of June 19 95
SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property.
r
(KSL:pm/0524P)
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION ALIA
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015
/ ,/3,0 q'3. J41
FILE TITLE: J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
APPLICANT: J.T. Roth Jr. OWNER: Michael Denton Jr.
12540 SW 68th Parkway, Suite B P.O. Box 1768
Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97035
(503) (503)
REQUEST: The applicant requests approval to develop a
4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest corner of
SW 68th Avenue and southwest Franklin Street.
ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services
and professional office uses.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW i�•
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 1 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108,
18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164.
CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request
PHONE NUMBER: (503)
DECISION MAKING BODY
X STAFF DECISION
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00
CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X
X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317
SDR 95-0015 July 10,1995
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS
June 20, 1995
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Or. 97223
RE: WCTM 2S1 01 AA tax lot 8200
Site Development Review Application
"Applicant's Statement"
As a requirement of application I offer the following relating to the development of property at
the above noted location.
This submitted Site Development Review Application is specific to the development and
construction of a single story office building being proposed on the Southwest corner of 68th
Parkway and Franklin, City of Tigard, County of Washington.
On the 4th day of April, 1995 a pre-application conference was held at the City of Tigard to
review and address the issues and requirements of the development standards specific to the site
location and the type and use of the proposed building. Present at the meeting were Mr. Michael
Anderson, Mr. Mark Roberts (both with the City of Tigard) and Tim Roth (applicant). The
preliminary site plan submitted at this meeting has been corrected to address the development
standards established for the current property zoning and the "revised" plans are now be
submitted for Site Development review.
The following requirements have been addressed and designed for approval:
-Zoning district dimensional requirements
-Special setbacks
-Special building height provisions
-Parking and access
-Clear Vision area
-Landscaping
-Buffering and screening
General comments regarding the following:
-SIGNS: Any sign to be erected on the building will be permitted with the City prior to
installation. As of this date there is no application for tenant improvements.
-"Other Agency Permits": Pride Disposal has been contacted and a site plan sent for their
approval and "Hauler sign-off".
-68th ACCESS: A 24' wide access is proposed on SW 68th Parkway as a common access
to service both tax lots 8200 and 8500. A reciprocal ingress and egress easement
is being created for both property owners approval and signature.
-UTILITIES: The issue of storm drainage, sanitary, and storm water quality have all been
addressed in the attached letter submitted by Sisul Engineering.
-TOPOGRAPHY/TREE SURVEY: A topography and tree survey has been completed by
Centerline Concepts, Inc. and attached to the blue-print drawings. The
locations of existing trees do not suggest that any one may remain, however,
a substantial amount of new trees are being noted to replace the existing and
enhance the site.
-SOLAR ACCESS: The height of the building (single story) and general location of the
site (corner lot with street to the north) eliminate any solar shading to
buildings located to the north of this structure.
-OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS: SW 68th Parkway has been improved to meet current
standards and does not require additional improvements, with the exception
of sidewalks (as noted on plans). SW Franklin will require the completion of
the (1/2) street, curbs, and sidewalks. Engineering documents for the
completion of said improvements will be submitted to the City for approval
along with building design and engineering. Street lighting exists along the
easterly side of SW 68th Parkway and since no lighting has been required
along the westerly side this site should not be required along its' frontage.
There presently exists a street light attached to a power pole on the south side
of Franklin (along frontage of this property). The overhead power and
telephone line that exist along property frontage will be removed and
relocated under ground and the existing light will be mounted to a pole. This
will all be noted on the off-site street improvement plan design.
In the design and placement of the building on this site we have attempted to stay in harmony with
the suggested Tigard Triangle specific plan. Our proposal has intended to follow the suburban
office park pattern through the street orientation of the building, placement of parking behind the
building and extensive landscaping. Our building orientation has placed the longer side parallel
with 68th Parkway with accenting street trees approx. 35' apart.
Sub 'tted .r App oval
-
' . Ro , Jr
Applicant '
ProvoSal//1�arra�✓e
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall
Tigard, Or. 97223
Attn: Planning Dept.
RE: Development Review
68th& Franklin site
NARRATIVE:
It is our desire to construct a commercial office building on the south-west corner of 68th
and Franklin, located in the "Tigard Triangle". The purpose for this preliminary review is to
discuss general and specific questions relating to the development of the site and it's
improvements. I am listing below those questions that have immediately surfaced in these early
stages of design and would appreciate a response specific to these and other questions that may
arise.
1. There presently exists a main storm line in 68th Parkway with a catch basin located on
the property frontage of 68th.
-will a C.B. be required on Franklin and will a storm line be required on Franklin?
* I have noticed that the improvements being performed on the north-west corner
do appear to be doing either.
2. I am assuming that a C.B. will be required in the parking lot.
-does the City have a requirement for the number of C.B.'s required in relationship
to the parking lot surface area?
-can any amount of water run-off to the street (Franklin)?
3. We would like to locate our building approx. 2'from the property line fronting Franklin
and 68th, allowing for minimal landscape area.
-can we locate the street trees in the City's common are fronting the property?
4. We are showing the parking lot being installed approx. 2' off the westerly line and
directly on the southerly line (creating a shared approach situation with property to south).
-is there a min. landscape buffer area required between two common property's of
like zoning?
5. I am showing two approaches, one on Franklin and one on 68th. The preference would
be to have one on Franklin if only one is allowed. I would offer the one on 68th as a shared
approach with the property to the south.
-what is the City's attitude on this?
6. Street lights exist on the opposite side of 68th
-will they be required on our side?
-nothing was required on Franklin with the improvements on the north-west corner
will I be required to install on Franklin?
-will there be site lighting required?
I have noted that the scheduled "pre-app." meeting is April 4, 1995 at 9:00 am, please notify me if
this time or dated has changed.
incerely
Aim Roth
J.T. Roth Construction, Inc.
JLIH cl '95 U1:U1uHi LH1LHbU I1ILL
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y P R O F I L E -- .
Washington County
********************************************************************************
* *
* OWNERSHIP INFORMATION *
* *
* Reference Parcel # : 2S101AA 08200 *
* Parcel Number :R0456768 TRSQ: 02S-01W-01-NE NE *
* Owner :DENTON MICHAEL J'R *
* CoOwner *
* Site Address : *NO SITE ADDRESS* *
* Mail Address :PO BOX 1768 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035
* Telephone :Owner Tenant
* *
* SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION *
* *
* Transferred: 11/30/94 Loan Amount *
* Document # : 107769 Lender
* Sale Price : Loan Type *
* Deed Type Interest Rate : *
* % Owned : 100 Vesting Type : *
* *
* ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION *
* *
* Land : $66, 280 Exempt Amount:
* Structure : Exempt Type *
* Other % Improved : *
* Total : $66, 280 Levy Code : 02381 *
* 94-95Taxes : $1, 036. 58 School Dist :TIGARD *
* *
* PROPERTY DESCRIPTION *
* *
* Map Grid: Class Code:
* Census :Tract Block *
* NbrhdCd : ZTGL MillRate : 15 . 6392 *
* Sub/Plat:WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS *
* Land Use: 2002 VACANT,COMMERCIAL *
* Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, *
* :LOT 6-8 & 35-36 , ACRES . 29 *
* *
* *
* PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS *
* *
*•i Bedrooms Lot Acres : .29 Year Built : *
* Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 12 ,500 EffYearBlt : *
* Heat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: *
* Pool : BsmUnfinSF: Foundation : *
* Appliances : Bldg SqFt : Roof Shape : *
* Dishwasher : lstFlrSqFt : Roof Matt *
* Hood Fan : UpperF1SF : InteriorMat : *
* Deck • Porch SqFt: Paving Mati : *
* Garage Type: Attic SqFt: Const Type: *
* Garage SF : Deck SqFt : Ext Finish: *
********************************************************************************
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
' h � :111,01'.',...,./ -+
J UI I L 1 J5 1J 1:ULF;.1 (..-111 -0.; 1.1 1 LL.4 •(f I . ^�y '""y"t,.', ...;..4-1,3., :10••31,..i.4.,...1.44......:67,%.004," e,
i". ,i . .. ..,. .r. ,i.' r .AT'r �►`C�.`�:•y«' •$. th '{r��'"` b 1;.,,I•�,
fir. ^r 1 3: ,s 1.l;fa•�,>.;,, ,%.'M,'�,A• �. r,:. r '1 yep•„ /: ,• • .
• - eee!T'�iYag�a�N ri,L~ia�re"ir
'••••.'71'. .�•' h; :;i�: .' 7.,....;:i7.-.-,....1.-..•••••, �:'��a�r% ft' .` Zf r..•• y�*• ''�:a:.�A'r±% �4...N; :�y�: "•:+ajf'��.r-,yR'ti•�:• .01,;••••»�(�'•I,.jr.� •frY �.i,•. •Z�M•� ZT.. CQ S: %' ?� .�.. .•,r •
; ,, .ao• , . n!•,!IM. 'i I'1''1”' ,.. �, i� +ti,.n ry r .\.3.,:''.",. .:., a; 'r. ,::. .�t
•:$.i_c�iw�:'<•. -:'I: .r.•: i�:�I',:;�. •1:•3'Y}!�:^•;•'�t.'fti vc.t':•�..ti�,'i�',iS''�i;{ ,T:'.:.i ..e!�•�➢.•`4dr ,''n,: :1 f'",. �, :�:rne�•:�.r?L•..i?�y
. I .a 7 ,'•q r4 /� 'aM,,N.'Sif�M�hwAx}1.(WI
:.. I•J c5. d v I '""
^,-. :, wMeNrtY DIM ."r•. .,�f •ej•°,c :�:"`•;gar KNOW ALLMENa t'TH85SPRP 5ENTS,That..,,•....,...91' 1.6 DE1.170t1 _ __. •.,rests ::i.:,,:T, :h:. ..
{••(1•„ '•t' '�� ........•`..-......'- .._..„........o..............w., ....,.,.,,.»«.„..,.,y......N++...+.�...rrwrwc....ii �' • 'h.;r. I- •1
hereinafter cwlled the rant coneldetatlon hereinafter b A y
••"�,,• t',',..'.....:•,••' Or for the r elated,M panto(paid y. _ ,•,;
r • \ „i herelnalier Called the grants*, does hereby /rant, bargain, sell and convoy unto the itrentee srtd9Ya, w'e lrhfi” ` +`: ”
' M/,1,�`,',' '. succa.W11 and lHigns, that CertaiI real property,with the t.n.menta,heredltv3,en1.and appurtnnanc.ihoretrrllo. - D,M.:•- ••••"`"*y' r'-iv., `• belonjI g or In arty way appertalnlrtj,situated in,,.,,Wh.Sih,f.ng.tat1 County,State of Oratory da+albed r -':JIN'�s.1 1`/,
`} ,' t -wit: •''. .
� Lots 6,7,8,35 a 36, Block 20, WEST PORTLAND I,EIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, 1 , ;, •• ,•'•
'. • i County of Washington, and State of Oregon. '
tygl r .'' .
.01::,r.•: This deed is given to dtsolve the partnership between 011via Denton <'', - e
;��'' �° and Michael Denton, Jr. p
y '; Thh Instrument filed for record by
_
1•.+:::+' I fldel•Ity Hettonei Title 6ompeny es en • ,
t �' :Z eccomodetion only. It hes rat been Y' :
'w
y_?' .. eizemined es to its,e><ecutlor•or u to ;, Ii :
c >rf 1' � its eftcct open the tlU
C-3•'y. �` 1� Ur SPACE WSUrrIULNT,CO•RINUE OESC0.t PTtOtI ON 0.tYt1tSE SIDE) • • � e
• '
y� To Have and to Held the ums:.n to the grtnte•and granni s hairs,successors and assl(rts forever. ''•
�` ;• Ex 4': •. 1 }I And grantor hereby covenants to and with Irene,.and granite's heirs,auccsawrs and assigns,that grantor is '
f(
e - • • t : lawfully+aired in fee simple of the above grrnted pry! itee Lean all encumbrance, _.,•„•t1Q11e..................«.._.,•
r 'A. t' t I and that �,.;w ,. q.. 1..
': t ;` 1 grantor will warrant and forever defend the r,rem;aee end every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims , •';>..:I,�::+!.i ,' {•
r y' and demands of all
,t 1/ •
potions whomsoever,ezCept those claiming under the above described erlcvtrlbrMrrc.s. r ?' r�;.•;.,,.
,i: :j ,1: E The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in ternie al dollar+,is$ -0�..._•,..___..., ;.-4.S��,,`res:,::•.'•':
' • • '" t +' 4DHowev.r, the actual consideration con.;ate of or include° other property or value given or prOnveed which is ' t'4;.•:. 1�;"•`-'•
•• ;:..• x` ... , flee while .4,..
• l�rt�,�Cenaidefelion(indicate which).�The ae�bl.oe between the rym6eft41,ft not eppl(eab/e,ehoula b deleted.SK ORS 9SA70-) 1fy•.,ti's ,:4;•,,
,;. l in construing this deed, where the context no requires,the aingul.r includes the plural and all grammatical �..• , r
is, uj II ch.nges shall be made so that this deed shell c Y•. ualt to cw ration.z end to individuals. f%°t l.'' :�`"`''
' PP 3 0 Y po 3`J .i,�,
• ' .41 • I In Witness Whereof,the grantor has executed thia,netrveront this day ol_..,....NA.Y.PDIb,e.r 19-..9 % �(it�a: i,......4::.
,.
if a con rare ranter, it has cau.ed Its name be signed end its ate?,if an affixed by an officer •iiiiii_�'• .y.y 'i' .',•,
Po 1 t' Y. y or other person a.•it..;. :!,
tS.• duly authorised to do so by order of its board of •��'`
', .+� ;; THIS p,'STRU11bNT WILL NOT ALIf7W USE 01 THE PROPERTY DESCAIeEO IN THIS '//•'��f''/^'j r 4"'""'T — 'I.'..,....................._.,„.....,. ',) •' ••S••• •• '•T•:. INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION Of AYF^.ICteLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS 01 f v r Dnnton 'siia '` j:,...;'.::.`”
i , arc ^:. : •
• ��, � 6EfOnE SIGHING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT.THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE �°
.�t�c TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOUlO CHECx vA:H TxE AP9RCPRtATE CIT'r OR CvLxiv ,.....- — ..* '• ;.'' ,'.
' i.j. - {` PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVE°USES ANO TO DETigMIHE ANY '�r.} �.Sr;��.
LIMITS ITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AG DEFINED IN — }gy, 1;
o > ORS C 'k,i.' ,.,,.
• .. . l STA ,l a=•�•( A
This t wt,........belorn me on ttQ1 r 30 19 1 ,�'
T O'7 OREGON,County o! fat S )floe "'
j• ,, � h; 'na(rumer,t was aGkno edged e e ......., ,,octtbe ..� ...r.4, `, „• ',l5 ('
�. ► ;. w: _ by !'IL1.v.ia.,lit:n.ton ;:....;#.4.,.,;••„;‘•. :.;'
t< This instrument wa ruled a On ' ,,,. ................•,,.. 3` : 1;yc..,`r
>' s ackzto Q d before rri. yy�, ,t9.. [�, F. ,;� .. i; 'r;_',a•
bY
j�1' ,
i
{,. N0.UE h, . ^p$- '1 SIILLIt M.LITTLE� -: � ,. v �7 NO TARN'PUeuc or/room `4 • No!AFC(Ptletl6 ovEOOM f I ',,,.. .. ,
:ssl Yy` ., II ` ' COMMISSION NU U2oea9 comeusmoh'NO{Wen { '•l�•�••�• '�"' 'i-
.. / ; ,•�',1 I - l GCMMISSlON Ece,RE:DEC 23 1953 WI COMMISN'Oti t r.IPES DEC 23 tetO No(err ubl' for Oregon
a.1 ; a' My commission aspires /'�.�d,/ (
'- '2.(;•:. I• __. STATE OF ORT,ON, ) '�.Y'
!` , 'r r Ccunt of (sae k � .
/certify that the within instrument
Is .'•:.:.+• 'L: t aneA,.,'•14.•••••••I Aaa,w
1 t wee received for record on the dry
1.,. .; of 19 at
.l `,..i , ii ••ACC,usovice o'clock M.,end recorded in g,
!�• j eve bsok,lteel/volume No on p `i.
ow,l,:,Name.Af A+f,w age 'i='?q:.
�, •i. [ aecea,rat era 1
f ,ti.' and/or as fee/rile/inetru-
il, •,r:: AN..e„aeNt r•■..w n(Moro,Af.,.M,Prl, I C';•PCt.
;. 1 „il{.GhAP.p1_Denton,,.Aar,_,« meat/microfilm/reception No ;.:J`
� t iI P,..7e. 5IO)t...1.�b�1 Record of Deeds of acid County. I :'trv,
rt 1 I' n r:'
:c... ::.....'-...*:,-.:.•- •'.+ t..?'::' P .t1,Prig.•..P.R_..5Z,a3.5..............._.... Witness my hand and lief of t,' Ya`r
-, ':a U•,II ww.n.e.+,.errs...,r n,r McNeMwf.w IN....AN••,i41, County '►r, •,.,,tet
roes •'•
Same d� 1 @ _. rc..:° 1,4., .J.
1 By ,Deputy r '•
..' t .'i! .. s in gs oat A ah A dw ...al'.,..
,..... , .,, ,',, '.. •44;e1W ilSfI9,r4-74":"•:,r,:,.. !, .04; ,
..1,......, ,-(,.4.?„..,;:::,,,'i..,' :41.:.t...,.. -..„-.:,.:7,.,-i'•,'.„..;-.i. 47,97.:41e,a''tig ' '.1•' 1.‘,k,: •:'et,,0/341M147:771,■,:'4.4%,"■.••.,,,,‘,4....k,,, ,'.,_.,i,tk, .#* ,N sit t„i.t..‘,:,t .; ,,,•'.,,,,, '..,' *,,.1 kyr',
41„;.. ..61,,rA., ,,,).:;;t4itvel.o.fit)4", rot.,0,,vilitt,4:,,, , .,,, ,.A,T. ,t,_-'• ";.*:•'.:.-_,t.,;,.ft.e.Af..,..,,71, ..:., .'..• v•E„,;-,i,-,,,,;,•;•c„; 41 r710; ,, c..xe.te,i...0,-.‘,;;;;,..v;.-....',„1.-:::;,,.,":1.,....;:,:x.„1.1
,r,..1 'Ft? kpl.' v. Vn , ' , ,Ar4Feetl. , - . • Iii,.ix; ryl.
4'. t.tt.,,11,,,,1.j,,v4.rtIlt:t .f.:,':',-• IC 4•'',;:r4r :7-..- v.,'' ' • 4 ::4,, .21 1,4•44 4111.tfi4.•...'1.11441,' ,,..:',..-4 . 1.t..,' . ; 1,,,,,,trArzl.Zk?.?,..:te.11.gietia'At.i
4:1'....;. i,f2" .11.1,(i, il,h,..''Z,•.V. ;'1•'L',.4.).4; .f.;V ' .4.‘ 11 a; .. .' A 'tr..' t•rig,* ^PS:,,T,:i.f:-..ips!......:;‘,,;`,!:,t:14......iiii.;•.'-,s'
40,
„....::::,. ...f.„..ri,..11-1.,,,t4...i:„1.,..4..t,..1.4„it:v..4.v_7„kw*. c,...,;i:,,..,,.gt, . , ... \,. ,s...,i5.1.,:.;vx.t;,....,....t;_eAg,..:.: :.!_.....i.e.,,,,:,..t.,........4....,.. . ?,.
....,...„::, .,..,..:.,;.,2,:..i.,....,, ,:.,.....3.......„„..0...8. ..0a4.......,..1 „,..„....„„.. „... • ,i.,,. J ..Ar # ,,.::. .0.,, . A‘ "..,'•$P, ...'',•,', - ''''x''''&1.'44174.'4;r3li.;;47"ri..&'''..1;74442411.%•.701'..".i. 00..''
,I•44,,' ' ''',1 ' ,.'ir 't,,,,,;tlit'itiot ' ^.' M it.‘',"'.1.,' ‘474,r1;4 ,!..:,:::•■..74.,;1.-;;;;;10',14:i.:•?..,`,:414.,7•Ai'..:',
V „oil.
'''..` .it4111r 41- - ,".1...::.,,e : ....,‘.,,:. ,?, , l?'. 111.*.v.k ' •Irafri.:.0 .‘.4';',';541,;".r.i;r:tb.Z.P.4.1";1:44re,i',' ,f,',V4
•-., ,S.ttift %,', t....,,,•11:;te....Iiiir , ./fy ; •• i',. 1. .14,'(011V•ro Al-.1.- v4".-'-.i ',Weri.:...;.0.,•:;:‘;--,,..,•1:-'.1.,:,..'r'`. 7,-,', !.''
■ ' - .. .'" ' " '... ''''' ' .- ' "'..' ..' .:''4.''' '' '..::-'•1... 3.•‘.,.'' .-...:`• '..'...1,..::.;. ..;•.',....;.".'.f.. 44.:
.. • ' • ■.....tti .......41,'; ".. . ...
..., s
.10 •
+: 7 •,.....• .....,,,..),,,...:, ...,,..y.;•., -,,e",. . 4,...:'''' - V'
•....;;••:':'.'...'' (.;-.,i_(..;:,:,1".:;* ,g, ••-•, (:•••;,.,,-.., 11)..1,,
:.;•,.:
• •-•• ...t: ••,;44., •LIS••.,0" .t'' ' '•••••."'''
---- • .4 -. ..• , . - • .f. :..,"..i. .,.
.:•..?".4, ..
TAT op ORECION ' ...'• • •i:-'',111! :;::' -.;.4 ...!:•'-• .4•;
,..., ,. couniyow..4,injt,„, I st . ..,-.f?1--.:. '' .*: - .c■al
..,,, .,„s•-i....m1„40.--ez.54 .,,„,;.- of Asseo... •,^1-,,7 . '.'..... '• -..'- i:04
-...•
clam to, )410,41 .. 't:-.11,4,4i...• ••., ...,, .-, „'•:,,„„
r.4144...:-,
474ke. tn. . gr'4!0114t1.•.;?:..4.'*•A .'2(filiviYar '•'•%*.-' . allk..'s^'
, " !;;C :-.' ..,.1 .kAto , ';1.:4:,:;4,;,, .-.• -• ..,'., ,s...'•• gim.
,.. , . . ,•
.. ,....
•2'. . 1 ' 0
.c,iiv ,J.:0- 1,_. ti,. ,...,
, _ .,..
. 0 . '7471'4'netor of • ..V.; ''
•
. • ,..•
4•
, RI.ei Icato:/119394437033: i,,,):2 opti 33.00r,•:•4.7:,;:;..,- ;;!, :1.!.:111.:::":''':..:::.
.‘' '• DOC ( 94107769 . • ".... .f '''
' '.'..■
•••••;: :.11
N.i.' if',..
.,.:
...t.:„.7.r• .•
-:-.:::::.••:.•
..;2';:.
• •:•• ' •• •'. • . .... ..It. ...,;.f.!:k; ..,i.,'„.,.'..,•;.%....*.‘“,:.........., ,
• •
;trii;'..:!7, • •:. ..., . • .• . •••41...."7-1/4.$..".• ••••,',',::....:I.r...A.,..-.. . ,
.v......):,:,
•;2:.-t.:.;:.
-...;,..vr.
,:ta;',1,..r.', • . . •
;.*: ?:.,..•,,,
• . . ,
1 ..,:. ., .•. • ..• ;•::• . ''• '• '•-.. '•:.-• -•'.' . f
. .
-4•.,r 1.1
.-
•01,'1...:•...
f.,.:;.;,.../:. • '
. • • •'' .. ■ ,.: '.' •-:, •..:. ' ..0... j
.2'''..1.,:i I.J.• • .
•
.;::;•:'i s.
•
••••. ....(•■
. . .
.1".•••■•a• ,
' • . , ;'
:i.....0.,1
.h5,.47.•?;:.: .. :1:'. ,'4'......•.''I ' .... .-
.i....;‘.
. ,,,,,,,,,a■
;1,1,1•1.,.
! ' "• ,Y..5
' '!". . ••''. ' .P..!'
.''-.. ,•f,?, it it ,.
1.1••,„:1,_
..,k...„...c
f/ :
''3' '.1'.4 • • • 7-■
Z.:,.•„ , ;•• •
41111.4,h
. ,
%,"••:..:%z•. •41 - • • • ,1 ,P"
' .4
,....,....;,-.1;
.;,,....1..;;;;.. ' ''',4":■h!, . '..,!k'•• ' k
1. •!,1; "?.:t;•.
',VA's ',1,.,:'.''...P.. •,,,,
... r.4. A
•I.:4..::.:'. il ?.''
•:• , .
':! :Iiii'.*„iily'r,•.!3- .•i-• -
Cr,
- '
‘='re4:41.:./ : ''''-'•`ri:*•': . ..
. 4. 3 ei•
P .0
I•'4:-,`., '
6",. ,))1. ' ' ."•.44e.,
• . ,
•71:1%.1.1.■,4: •r!.0 otn, .• 5.1:.
''''.!•''e'''+1: l'i....;'.'if, ' . .
:•• ' '
tZerf•*. ',-;•;- . '',3.
...• 44.56,• .,.,.‘. :,, .,74,..,
*•Y4,...1..!
.4t.A.-44.•
.i•-,.•4 c't .
,;•'",-.4, .... ci,,
'• 1..!'4,1-'k
;- )-1'•
4 ) • •,..tti . c 1.
; 0.4
•
414 "•\,-, ;
t; •,,
:. .1..*
1 ' '
,.. ..,. ..
12.
, ,. ... t - .... •
f,..,, , •' 1,:.
'',.I' •
'1'1'4■"` . " '
• 4..t; .
*. 4 :to ,1:, .• i
'....:'.. ''...r.tii7.41r? ,'14. 549:444c1,-4;.,::"•;;rt...."777'7. .-..• ?.,:s••-...:•• .. . . - ...;...........k.,..,■..,. . .,.... • :.4...„.,,, t.. .- -,.,. ....,I.,,-,%.- ,4?la'''IA - . :., : .f.t.ry-
i';.51!:.4: '11.4.:•:0:,i,„ '4.(.1,„,2s,„,:o.,,, ,,;, ,...*.: ....1 ....-...,. ..::....*.;,....: -,.!.g..:::;i/::4•• fp.:•,:,:;• ;- ::!;-?4,...:. ,,..:iitri-.J.;...,L:,..192.,71.tx,sr..,•, .„Iii,.;. 14.:-. t-1. a1/4f4t.-:„-' : ,'4•• .....'" ' c•'..1:
*
, .41,!,f-,4...,:., fu•kv,..7;.:1,,„,•&:„,.(s,•;-vg,,,,-.,-.-.:.; ......•••:. ...:•••••.•,!:•; •. '..."•,:'-,...:7:,•;;..4.If::.'.., ---:••:`i,:t..t.••••• ,,,....,....:;,c,r.:4:••••,;,•?.i,li•To,.,•tz,wqx4-11,...,„i• 3;•egi,fi.i' -....':ii ' • •; •••••:: .
.,..1,.. ,........eviv. 1..vw6.:40frIo....... .............,:::: .. . .. ,; . ..... ...,...:.... .•, •: ....,'..........•*.-...:•;.,:,..-......r;...::;'..•k.,..:.:.i.:.!:4).1.;:i•ftt.I.,',1.441 '/** ..,.',,r`.1.4.1Zt.. ii.44',."; ' '''',‘•
, .%•A-_,:l „,„ii,,M,,.ItA„,1,).44.4Q,...,!:;.". •.;.''.• •
to
•• .....,:•.::.4..',..,•- •.,'... r •'Lt..,...,•*.„1„.„ .•-• ....,i(-,V) 1. „., ,,.,.. •
• ••ill••0. ft •?.,.....:, ..5,A.... . % .1.0..,'s,, .. ,
.‘''''•, 44'4.I I}elt,,,...,.1,4-::-..1,,,--......•-•-.
• -'Z'-`.t . ..-:'•0 ,f,,•-•'•w ,-,:'!-•'! 2•41•:!:,:r.i:.' :F."•3 - • • .•I., •.• . 's"••• .• ' - . - • •t-.. :' .....:!•••••....:,- •`..:-. .."4*-*•:',..'''''.:0',1)•:--.:4::43,..i- „?':-;•-•'-4-... .1..„'•i::•,.. ,t.
,_- •.• le •-,....,,,4r,•• . ,,.....e,.t..,...",,,a.y..14.e.,;„ .• - . ,•...., ..,.:. .• ,?... .,.., .. .:......_.•-,...• ...,k,.::.•:.- ••••••....:i:"............:,..:...›,,:,...•!;.u. „.,,tt,,,,,, • le!...,e.si,..4,,,.:.,.,,, .
4-••,i,..•. ,t_it.0„,„,,,11.4,..;;„,,, •:.,-N,,,,-f,, As ... .....,... .., 7. , .7... . .• ... . : I,•..-• •-,...:.!.t.....• • 1.:..1.•.,•••,.•......,;LA:, ...1 ..b..„74,vm ... 1'IA.. ....7v„te,.-t, , , •
' i's. . :;,, , ,.;t ' .‘..4::,1:■••,,,gg,tirAiN.'?..,"....:-%•,•• •r ,::-•..:.• ... .....-.• • . •...:., %. . . .-,,..•,.• ..:.%.. :t.s.,:.•!.:$.4.-:;:cst.'A..",.- .", •rfrt.. •'? '44. all 44. . "
: 01;•.:'' -'. %., :.."'7"::::7:"..r.1•• '.1.-:•-1.-•'..1%,......:"..',..•.:,'',. ..-.*%:. ...:.: . I •-•*.'. -•, •2-1;":.:•, ....7..-•:f i.z;....,01:4;...3`. .. .31A, Z.4 9,-?.. .„.!i;5'...!1•1":;" :.:•,*.•4•7), '.•--, ''', •': ,
•;41,4.z,..!'....si.••,. . ...;.j .7 Ay•::.....,.." 'v.,'....■ -,;,. ...,..:... .1.•-.. '' %. • . .- ;- ..e..si',...--1...,:•••••••en;'• ,r,tst,.7t1..s.;....emt,e,..3.4t,,,,14,,,,..,; •.,2.'-'-..:'. .' '-:
4% ••••..,••••••.'.,.-ri.,C:'.4.4••■. ....eq.'-"..... ;;;,• k '..- ara4A •■. _ , ' 0■<;•
ye
3,
, ,..,,,,. •.-. ......-:f. ... ,.. ,,,,. ...,.....,,- -...-... . .. ..-.:.4.--k...r.t v, 4.-,,,,,01.4 lik. r ;, .. ! ‘ :t,..i.7./..
. ...,
:..
. . '..;,-.,...1.:f-A-....- .-t.t t., Y.,a'-.4‘.".."11'''..41.1 '■4‘1,..:! •':•• !..;"-L.'.'IF-% •,. ." .4...!•..•:.'1,.."..,. .
t:.,,.:•;,4 *fr:. -:'..,.....-.;.•..'"."-::,-1.1.:j.•tliite.--,;6 nv.,:,••:'.9,i.1.;..A.,..i.r•ovi■.. :■'"''.•1• •V,4.:1'.11'
it:ilk:4-D;eibIrx."4,?%;;;!:-:•7.':•:.,P..,,-.0.;VAIIT.1.1%:.•1/4.'4,!..:::%'4'.4:.•*.et-144'...:',.1'4 4.•(;,■,.:i•.4.‘...1.,4..,
-..'I'•••-•;..Af...'ie:)•••••••••..1'• ..‘':'''...'.....t...*".:'(":...•' :''.:..'0...' •10 .. ''' •"•".■:.,*.- ' •'• • ' -
June 20, 1995
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Or. 97223
RE: Estimate Site Cost
The following is an estimated cost to perform on and off site improvements to the proposed
development located at the SW corner of 68th Parkway and Franklin.
Excluding: -permits
Including: -survey/engineering
-excavation/rock
-utilities
-landscaping
-asphalt parking
-extruded curbing
-concrete approach/street sidewalks
ESTIMATED COST $ 49,300.00
In addition: 1/2 street improvements to SW Franklin
-excavation/rock
-asphalt street
-curbing
ESTIMATED COST $ 10,000.00
14.
.•
SOt ENGINEERING A Division o f Sisul Enterprises, Inc.
375 PORTLAND AVENUE, GLADSTONE, OREGON 97027
(503) 657-0188
FAX(503)657-5779
June 14, 1995
J.T. Roth Construction Company
12540 SW 68th Parkway, Suite B
Tigard, OR 97223
ATTN: Tim Roth
RE: Proposed office building, southwest corner 68th and Franklin, Tigard; J.O. 95-43
Dear Mr. Roth:
We have reviewed the onsite topography as provided by Centerline Concepts, Inc. and
have spoken with Michael Anderson from the City of Tigard, as well as made a visit to
the site. Our investigation has determined the following.
The proposed office building site can be served by the sanitary sewer in SW 68th
Avenue. This was confirmed by Michael Anderson, as well as the onsite topography
performed by Centerline Concepts, and the as-built construction plans. According to the
as-built sanitary plans, this sanitary sewer line drains south on 68th Ave. to Hampton,
westerly on Hampton to 70th where it ties into mains that existed prior to 1973, when this
line was constructed.
Storm drain facilities, and storm drain lines exist in SW 68th Avenue, as verified by the
topography survey and the onsite visit. Franklin Street and SW 69th are, for large parts,
unimproved streets, and drainage is by roadside ditches or swales. The site generally falls
in a southwesterly direction. It appears, from the onsite topography survey, that the
parcel will be able to be drained to the storm drain line that runs along the west curb line
of SW 68th Avenue. To drain the most southwesterly corner of the site to the storm drain
line in SW 68th Avenue, it may require some fill, perhaps less than a foot deep, to drain
to SW 68th. SW Franklin Street has been partially paved by development of the
photography store in the northwest quadrant of the intersection. SW Franklin Street falls
to the west, and improvement of curb and paving along the frontage of this street will
drain to the west. There is a modest ditch along the edge of gravel surfacing in SW
Franklin that will handle runoff from the limited frontage improvement required along
4
SW Franklin. This modest ditch continues south along SW 69th and becomes more
defined further south.
In regards to storm water quality, Michael Anderson informed me that sites that are less
than 1/2 acre are allowed to pay an in-lieu-of fee instead of constructing onsite water
quality facilities. This site is less than 1/2 acre in size.
It does not appear there will be problems in developing this site in terms of storm or
sanitary improvements. We note, as stated above, a small fill may be required in the
southwest corner of the site to be able to drain the site to the storm drainage in SW 68th.
According to Michael Anderson, there are not any storm drainage problems downstream
that should be a factor in consideration of development on this site. Due to the very
limited amount of development required on SW Franklin Street, and the fact that the site
does not drain towards SW Franklin, the existing drainage swales should be sufficient to
handle runoff from the limited street improvement required.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Sisul, P.E.
TJS/pls
Name of applicant •• \C?-1571\ >>�V-.
Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # gzno
Address or General Location S w G..0 r r.. . (,8'4e -r f v v
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
I, 3; \ • \ caz— cL• , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed
G-o,a•.w•urC.tai 1 10,•""A•1d tv•zi‘ affecting the and located at (o S`I' -t eFf-,.,,.1-1 is
, and did on the / I day of pry( , 19/5_ personally post notice indicating that
the site may be proposed for a Le. use application, and the time, date and place of a
neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal.Cris-
The sign was posted at "° -I-�I"ar.ld 11,-,
(state location on property)
This 7/CP. day of /i / , 19? S
Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this \t day of �� , 19
v____Notary Public for the State of Ole on C
____.
,f 'v OFFICIAL SEAL - `'S 4-1
MANE TYSON
My Commission Expires:
NOTARY PUSLIC-OREGON
�;es COMMISSION NO.041' ?2
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB.05,1999
WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO:
City of Tigard
Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
login\jo\postnot.cit
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
) SS
CITY OF TIGARD )
■ ' V S I' .: , being duly sworn, depose and say that on Lk' 1)'ei S
, 19 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of
a meeting to discuss a proposed development at e.ice'(' r.1c 1 i+� (S• cad iAtur,
, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and
were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at ! t to td(
, with postage prepaid thereon.
Ow. � / 1
Sig'
Subscribed and sworn to before me this //' cI day of Ya , 19 l5 .
OFFICIAL SEAL
\ 1
°- _t :• DIitNE TYSON Notary ublic
NOTARY;UREIC-OREGON
Coh•�. ssioN idU.04V,12 M Commission Ex fires:
MY COMMISSI:N EXPIRES F2.05,1999
h:\login\jo\affmail.cit
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner
FROM: Liz Newton, Community Involvement Coordinator
DATE: August 1, 1994 (updated list as of 8/1/94)
SUBJECT: EAST CIT Area Land Use Notification
Effective immediately, please ask your staff to have applicants
with proposals in the EAST CIT notify the following le:
Mary Swintek
. )-049915 SW Frewing #23
Tigard, OR 97223 0/14fd C
Craig Hopkins r� S
7430 SW Varns
Tigard, OR 97223 045
Mark F. Mahon
11310 SW 91st Court
Tigard, OR 97223
52)1/4.
Joel Stevens
9660 SW Ventura Court
Tigard, OR 97223
Pat Wyden
8122 SW Spruce
Tigard, OR 97223
Richard Louie
Darcy N Chang LANDMARK FORD INC James & Cora Corliss
8860 SW Bomar Ct PO Box 23970 6745 SW Franklin St
Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Wilhelm Jacob & Theresa Jr. Nellie Andrews
12540 SW 68th Ave 12540 SW Ave #B 12485 SW 67th Ave
Tigard, OR 97223 Tig , OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223
Michael Denton Jr.
Jacob & Theresa th Allen & Raymond Fuegy Olivia Denton Jr.
12520 SW Ave 12480 SW 68th Pwy #A PO Box 1768
Tig , OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97035
Donald Pollock
Richard Carpenter Michael Pollock Stephen Peirce & L Lynn
1834 SW 58th Ave #202 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 12525 SW 68th Ave
Portland, OR 97221 Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223
Elizabeth Pollock NORTHLAND HOMES INC Roger Pollock
1834 SW 58th Ave #202 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 1834 SW 58th Ave #202
Portland, OR 97221 Portland, OR 97221 Portland, OR 97221
SIGN UP
Public Hearing for Proposed Site Development April 25, 1995
tax lot 8200 (S.W. corner 68th& Franklin)
Please provide the following information:
Name I Address I City/Zip I Time I Signiture
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Comments: (Please give name)
Jo ;Y �7 ! j[Q lit.Q ✓ '�J
Tics„/ u-a�Sy c c c�«�uS' 0°74 - cc40kfe._, •
Public
NOTICE
This Proberty may be under consideration for a
land use application with the City of Tigard.
Posting of this notice, on this 11th day of April and shall remain posted
until the 25th day of April.
For additional information regarding this notice please call 639-2639
i\
J � J \
2S101AA-03901 2S101AA-04000
CARPENTER, RICHARD L NORTHLAND HOMES INC
BY DONALD E POLLOCK 1834 SW 58TH #202
1834 SW 58TH #202 PORTLAND OR 97201
PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-04200 2S101AA-04300 0 . 00 . 000 . . . . .
POLLOCK, DONALD E & LANDMARK FORD INC
CARPENTER, RICHARD L PO BOX 23970
1834 SW 58TH #202 TIGARD OR 97281
PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-04500 2S101AA-04900
LOUIE, RICHARD C AND ROTH, JACOB T JR
CHANG, DARCY N K Y 12540 SW 68TH PARKWAY #B
8860 SW BOMAR CT TIGARD OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
2S101AA-05200 2S101AA-05500
LANDMARK FORD INC CORLISS, JAMES L & CORA K
PO BOX 23970 PO BOX 23970
TIGARD OR 97281 TIGARD OR 97281
2S101AA-05700 2S101AA-06400
CORLISS, JAMES L & CORA K TING, ELON & SYLVIA
PO BOX 23970 BY WILLIAM R SOUTHARD
TIGARD OR 97281 9817 NE 54TH ST, STE 105
VANCOUVER WA 98662
2S101AA-06700 2S101AA-07100
OREGON STATE BAR WARDIN, MARION E &
1776 SW MADISON STREET WARDIN, ILA J
PORTLAND OR 97205 PO BOX 53
NEWBERG OR 97132
2S101AA-07600 2S101AA-07700
WILHELM, MICHAEL W ROTH, JACOB T JR & THERESA A
12540 SW 68TH AVE 12540 SW 68TH PKWY #B
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
2S101AA-07800 2S101AA-07900
ANDREWS, NELLIE B ROTH, JACOB T & THERESA A
12485 SW 67TH 12520 SW 68TH PARKWAY
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
2S101AA-08100 2S101AA-08200
FUEGY, ALLEN AND RAYMOND DENTON, MICHAEL JR
12480 SW 68TH PKWY SUITE A PO BOX 1768
TIGARD OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO OR 9703
2S101AA-08300 2S101AA-08500
POLLOCK, DONALD E & POLLOCK, MICHAEL E
CARPENTER, RICHARD L 1834 SW 58TH AVE #202
1834 SW 58TH #202 PORTLAND OR 97221
PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-08600 2S101AA-08700
PEIRCE, STEPHEN W AND POLLOCK, MICHAEL E
LYNN L 1834 SW 58TH AVE #202
12525 SW 68TH PORTLAND OR 97221
TIGARD OR 97223
2S101AA-08800 2S101AA-08900
POLLOCK, ROGER M POLLOCK, ELIZABETH G
1834 SW 58TH AVE #202 1834 SW 58TH AVE #202
PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-09000 2S101AA-09001
NORTHLAND HOMES INC POLLOCK, DONALD E/JULIA GAIL
1834 SW 58TH #202 1834 SW 58TH #202
PORTLAND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-09003 2S101AA-09100
POLLOCK, ROGER M POLLOCK, DONALD E
1834 SW 58TH AVE #202 1834 SW 58TH STE 202
PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221
2S101AA-09101
KINDRICK, ALFRED F
DIANNE M
12560 SW 70TH AVE
TIGARD OR 97223
From: <FINANCE/PATTY>
Subject: Re: I cannot find any such parcel as the following in Tidem
To: PATTY
X-To: PATTY,
Date: 12 Jul 95 14 : 25: 01
From: Self <PATTY>
To: patty
Subject: I cannot find any such parcel as the following in Tidemark
Date: 12 Jul 95 14 : 22 : 31
although it's on the assesor's map dated Jan. 13 , 1995.
2S1 01AA, tax lot 09004
Tidemark stops at tax lot 09003 .
FOR MY REFERENCE: SDR 95-0015
J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
CITY OF TIGARD
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
NON-RESIDENTIAL
DATE: 1
t '
llif/4
APPLICANT: J 41 A .; ■ AGENT:
.1 .17-
, 1 .- '. ea-14 /a7N
Phone: .63"- x/37 Phone:
PROPERTY LOCATION �
ADDRESS: /�/ �^�Ci►d i/u9s5 [SS L
TAX MAP & TAX LOT: `Z 5 I O/ A 2Q c
NECESSARY APPLICATIO (S) : �/► KJ e ?Q U1J (
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: J eIJ /7)
q / ) 5.7,1 0 '/C_
7 o 4 v ..ex r5Y v ^Jct c„zi t w_e„2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: L P
ZONING DESIGNATION: P
ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Minimum lot size: C66/O sq. ft.
4vc✓ �mn lot width: / S/3 fte c-& ' v?slc�+ ru.1ri
J Setbacks: front- /10,07-- ft. fide 1 1 M4.ft. , rear-AIM-aft.
garage- 1i1p ft. corner-neat/. ft. from both streets.
Maximum site coverage:
Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: HS
Maximum building height: (-I6 ft.
ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENS NAL REQUIREMENTS
Minimum lot front e: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land
partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a
minimum of 15 feet o frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access
easement.
Maximum lot depth to wid ratio of 2.5 to 1.
SPECIAL SETBACKS .5- ) �aK/J�N ��
Streets: �0 ft. rom centerline of �(
Established areas: N Q f . from n�4
Lower intensity zone : lti 0 ft. , along the site's 11 47 boundary
Page 1
SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS
Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020) : Buildings located in
a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided:
1. A maximum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5
to 1 will exist;
2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the
building's height; and
3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district.
PARKING AND ACCESS J
Required parking for this type of use: / e11� �
1561.1AA Secondary use required parking:
40% of required spaces may be designated compact-only spaces.
Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 in. X l ft.
Compact parking space dimensions : 8 ft. X 2Alft.
Disabled person parking: All parking areas providing in excess of five
/(:)/
required automobile parking spaces shall provide appropriately located and
designated disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled
person parking spaces to be provided and parking space size are mandated
by the Oregon Revised Statutes and Americans with Disabilities Act (see
() handout) . A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the
parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be provided.
Bicycle racks are required for civic uses, non-residential uses,
commercial uses, and industrial uses providing 15 or more automobile
parking spaces. Bicycle parking must be provided at a ratio of one
bicycle rack space per 15 auto parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be
located in areas protected from automobile traffic. The Planning Division
can provide specifications for approved bicycle rack types .
All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storge parking
areas, must be paved.
/
\\
Drive-in use queuing areas: µ����
Minimum number of accesses: 7>.7 4/;14, vbtUiln
Minimum access width: 24 ft.
Maximum access width: 40 ft.
Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking
areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets.
Parking area landscaping and screening: Required. See Landscapina section
below.
For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and
accesses, see Community Development Code Chapters 18.106 and 18.108. /'
Page 2
CLEAR VISION AREA
The City requires that clear vision be maintained between three and eight
feet above grade at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road
intersections in specified clear vision areas. The size of the required
clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional
classification. No buildings, signs, trees or other visual obstructions
are allowed between 3 and 8 feet above grade in these areas.
LANDSCAPING
Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or
private street or a driveway more than 100 feet in length. Street trees
must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private
property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must
have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet above grade. Street
trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on mature tree size.
Further information on regulations affecting street trees and a list of
recommended street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A minimum of one tree per seven parking spaces must be planted in and
around parking areas in order to provide a canopy effect. Landscaped
screening of parking areas from views from public rights-of-way must be
provided.
;OFFERING AND SCREENING
In order to increase privacy and to reduce or eliminate adverse noise or
visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different
land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site
perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of
width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and
evergreen trees and shrubs. Site obscuring screens or fences are also
required in some cases, and often are advisable even if not required.
Required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences,
utilities, and sidewalks.
Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be
found in Code Chapter 18.100.
Re fired buffer widths applicable to y•ur proposal area:
ft. along north boundary / ' ft. along east boundary
:red
. a ong south bound- y 11 ,,'' - ft. -ion• west bo d- 1s
In ition, `fig/ ••.cu g creeni g 's require, along
s a i f�,Jar, �� .`moo-c � a Gl4d ..c 1(-4ec( ZD
.age
SIGNS
Permits must be obtained before erecting any sign in the City of Tigard.
A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request.
Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if
the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development a••lica ' ••
SENSITIVE LANDS r/
57,00 € �N
Other Agency Permits. �V'/�-e 1O
e a vas 4 A,u Ve e/ 01 eelo ecv'-e. �S Y_
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS
3i.¢_ �i Gevl�Crfd ��/2Solc!/�e�
; ‘,1 c3'� 1-4 �S s Me. 'TZr e 2A24 was
tel J 1-0 ha c.2 i�cJ 0.2-141/1* ��-
veS�e.✓ I a s . "IS two( 1442a
REVAW PROCED
Staff review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the
Community Development Department counter at City Hall. Applications
submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division
acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4 PM on Thursday
will be batched for processing with the following week's applications for
processing. No applications will be accepted after 4:30 PM.
Maps SLtbu� ttec wi ax' app .cat Gn aha .�. be fo aled in,':.adv c* tc: 8 S by 11
in0:,;110wg One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be
submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision.
The Planning Division and Engineering Division will do a preliminary
review of the application and will determine whether an application is
complete within 10 days of submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if
additional information or copies of the submitted materials are needed.
The administrative decision/public hearing typically will occur
approximately - days after an application is accepted as complete by
the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult issues or
requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to
41) it tr=zwi - F"141C(114 a ire- 4joV 4 7° ( ds
Page 4
I h ba°A d2_ _a1,44Pr.e s/tie pWELf
ash kaP Yore r rI V/ u e ec/ c
�p a Y"IQN . s e ? 1 4 dr choh- D'� aC Vs
1 r/°
review. Written decisions are issued within 10 days of public hearings.
A 10 day appeal period follows all decisions. , Ari appeal on this matter
would be heard by the 1-1/4 p)%i/cci 414.1Wl 1 C'% .
A basic flow diagram illustrating the review process is available from the
Planning Division.
The pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are
intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community
Development Code requirements applicable to development of a particular
site and to allow the staff and prospective applicant to discuss the
opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site, The
conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects cf
good site planning that should apply to the development of your site play.
Failure of the staff to provide any information required by the Code shall
not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements . It
is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the
Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to
Code requirements prior to submitting an application.
Another pre-application conference is required if an application is to be
submitted more than six months after this pre-application conference,
unless is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division.
PREPARED BY: // A. i t1 g
(j) PLANNING DIIVISIO ,/
Y k 2 aes� ✓a g -2 t�-J
sr-v /-"k sior21,_ potaA, ,24,,a
IC 61011&-
10� � d o Y� 9
V r I./e. t,cx�. Q �N.t� � poitcyore
V€-u f.ew •
Page 5
1t
PUBLIC FACILITIES CITY OF TIGARD
The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: OREGON
(1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions.
(2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns.
(3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision
making authority shall be for the application.
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall he required of the applicant will be recommended by
City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making
authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity
to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as
specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
(1.) to feet from centerline.
(2.) to feet from centerline.
(3.) to feet from centerline.
Street improvements:
(1.) !G street improvements will be necessary along /CG<1‘)
(2.) eet improvements will be necessary along e9T�
(3.) Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb
and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined
appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider
on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights,
and a two year streetlighting fee.
m e/N2 pr ' vS,I, n y v ,_--
P7 70 5-6u7 t Ai frz.)P
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 3
Residential Application/Engineering Department Section
In some cases, where street i. vements or other necessary public impror nts are not currently practical, the street
improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approvdt may be specified which requires the property
owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation
of a local improvement district formed to improve:
(1.)
(2.)
Pedestrianways(bikeways:
Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sa ji ary sewer line to this property is a(n) B inch line which is located in
. The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is
the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's
Water Supply: The 7.1/ Water District Phone:(503) provides public water service in the
area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed
development.
Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2502) provides fire protection
services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy
of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection.
Other Agency Permits:
Storm sewer improvements: .e eJ/rrs y'/ito/G0e-49c,'7 517-10),
STORMWATER QUALITY FEES
The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water
Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the
applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the
construction of a water quality facility and/or the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious
surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if
a fee may be paid or a facility shall be
constructed. 7.0.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 3
Residential Application,Engineering Oepartment Section
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects
fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant
shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development.
The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may
be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible
only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. ,, E
STREET OPENING PERMIT
No work shall be preformed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening
permit from the Engineering Department.
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS
All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor
plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot.
— utztxz
PREPARED BY:.)
ENGINEERING DIVISION
PHONE: (503) 639-4171
h:loginlpat tylpreapp.mst
leng.section preapp.eng)
January 11, 1995
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3
Residential ApplicationiEngineering Department Section
Staff
Date �q;
CITY OF TIGARD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of
your application submission requirements . This checklist identifies what is
required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought
and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your
application. See your application for further explanation of these items or
call Planning at 639-4171 .
ITEMS TO BE
BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED:
A) Application form (1 copy) [
B) Owner' s signature/written authorization [t
C) Title transfer instrument a .= G1) v dP0 [ L�
D) Assessor' s map / -ter
E) Plot or site plan [
F) Applicant' s statement 0Q /Ct'led 140 v, T "� 7O-°,9� 1L]-
( • . ,. . . [
(H) Filing fee ($ ) � j [
SPECIFIC MATERIALS
A) Site Information showing (No. of copies '26/ ) : [L}�
1) Vicinity Map [y}l
2) Site size & dimensions [3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%)
4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [L]�
5) Locations of natural hazard areas including:
a) Floodplain areas //f / [ ]
b) Slopes in excess of 25% c�j [ ]
c) Unstable ground [1-3-----
d) Areas with high seasonal water table [�]�
e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [L}'—
f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [L]�
6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive
Map inventory including:
a) Wildlife habitats [L—
b) Wetlands [L��
7) Other site features:
a) Rock outcroppings
b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet
from ground level
8) Location of existing structures and their uses
9) Location and type of on and off-site noise sources [L�
10) Location of existing utilities and easements [2}�
11) Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways [ 4
B) Site Development Plan showing (No. of copies'2-00 ) : [
1) The proposed site and surrounding properties
2) Contour line intervals [ Q�
3) The location, dimensions and names of all :
a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways
and easements on the site and on adjoining
properties
APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1
b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements
on the site. [L]— ---
c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed
streets that require future extension [
4) The location and dimension of:
a) Entrances and exits on the site [
b) Parking and circulation areas [ta'
c) Loading and services areas [��
d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation L�
e) Outdoor common areas, [
f) Above ground utilities [
5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all:
a) Existing permanent structures, improvements,
utilities and easements which are located on
the site and on adjacent property within 25
feet of the site [C.._]-------
b) Proposed structures, improvements,
utilities and easements on the site [L—]'
6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of
downstream conditions [L�
7) Sanitary sewer facilities
[IA/---
8) The location of areas to be landscaped [ '4/
9) The location and type of outdoor lighting
considering crime prevention techniques [r��
10) The location of mailboxes [
11) The location of all structures and their orientation [L
12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [�'
C) Grading Plan (No. of copies ' 20 ) [G}/
The site development plan shall include a grading plan at
the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall
contain the following information:
1) The location and extent to which grading will take
place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios
and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year
it is proposed to be done . [,' ~
2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by
data factual substantiating:
a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical
engineering report [l-- ---
b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm
drainage service proposals [41-----
c) That all problems will be mitigated and
how they will be mitigated [G}'"---
D) Architectural Drawings (No. of copies c t : [ c3l
The site development plan proposal shall include:
1) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all
structures proposed for use on—site; and [L}-"----
2) Typical elevation drawings
�/o�f� 0.----------each structure. [ 0
.2-E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies ' ) : [
The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the
site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall
indicate:
1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [L
2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings [
APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 2
3) Loc.—ion of terraces, decks, shelter_, play areas
and common open spaces [�
4) Location, type, size and species of existing and
proposed plant materials .
The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses :
1) Soil conditions . [
2) Erosion control measures that will be used . [
F) Sign Drawings
Sign drawings shall-4)e submitted in accordance with Chapter
18 . 114 of the Code asst of Site Development Review or
prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ ]
G) Traffic generan estimate [ ]
H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment map showing
(No. of Copies ) :
1) The owner of the subject parcel [ ]
2) The own is authorized agent [ ]
3) The map cale, (20,50, 100 or 200 feet=1), inch north
arrow an date [ ]
4) Descriptio of parcel location and boundaries [ ]
5) Location, wi th and names of streets, easements and
other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ]
6) Location of al permanent buildings on and within
25 feet of all property lines [ ]
7) Location and wid h of all water courses [ ]
8) Location of any t ees with 6" or greater caliper at
4 feet above grou 'd level [ ]
9) All slopes greater ,han 25% [ ]
10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ]
11) For major land partit •n which creates a public street:
a) The proposed righ of-way location and width [ ]
b) A scaled cross-sect'on of the proposed street
plus any reserve st ip [ ]
12) Any applicable deed restri ' ions [ ]
13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude
efficient future land divisi• where applicable [ ]
I) Subdivision Prel ' inar Plat Ma. and data showin•(No. of
Copies ) :
1) Scale equaling 0,50, 100 or 200 feet to the inch
and limited to •ne phase per sheet [ ]
2) The proposed name •f the subdivision [ ]
3) Vicinity map showin- property' s relationship to
arterial and roller ►•r streets [ ]
4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner
developer, engineer, s veyer, designer, as applicable[ ]
5) Date of application [ ]
6) Boundary lines of tract to se subdivided [ ]
7) Names of adjacent subdivisio or names of recorded
owners of adjoining parcels o unsubdivided land [ ]
8) Contour lines related to a City-.stablished bench-
mark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater
than 10% [ ]
APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3
9) The arpose, location, type and size all of the
following (within and adjacent to the proposed
subdivision) : [ 3
a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements [ ]
b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ]
c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ ]
d) Major power telephone transmission lines
(50,000 volts or greater) [ ]
e) Watercourses [ ]
f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways
and other land encumbrances [ ]
10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and
storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ ]
11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system,
showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and
fire hydrants . [ 3
12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished
grade of all streets including street extensions for a
reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed
subdivision. [ 3
13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; [ ]
14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or
storm water overflow [ ]
15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water-
courses and drainage ways [ 3
16) The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot
dimensions and lot numbers . Where losts are to be
used for purposes other than residential, it shall be
indicated upon such lots [ ]
17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or
greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and
the location of proposed tree plantings, if any [ ]
18) The existing uses of the property, including the
location of all structures and the present uses of
the structures, and a statement of which structures
are to remain after platting [ ]
19) Supplemental information including:
a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) [ ]
b) Proof of property ownership [ ]
c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision
improvements [ 3
20) Existing natural features including rock out-
croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. [ 3
21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably
be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be
incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the
application. [ ]
J) Other Information [ ]
Sot Calcuia, C1v5
(2362P/0028P)
APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 4
ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TO: Bill Monahan
FROM: Dick Bewersdorff J73
DATE: August 10. 1995
SUBJECT: Approved Land Use Decisions Through 8/10/95
Decision Issued Date: 8/10/95
Final Appeal Date : 8/23/95
1.) SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0015 J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDING
The Tigard Planning Director has APPROVED, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS (attached), a request for
Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 4,726 square foot office building.
LOCATION: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, tax lot 8200). At the southwest corner of SW 68th
Avenue and southwest Franklin Street. (Vicinity Map below)
(Site Plan attached)
c_ , (Conditions attached)
• --
•
ZONE: Commercial Professional C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and
professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters 18.62. 18.96. 18.100. 18.102. 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116. 18.120, 18.150 and
18.164.
h:',icgimparty'\8-10-95.;n2 (page 1 of 4)
a) o Ti t7) ,J 'd U ' n) - 01 v r-I 11 11-1 'U n) 'Ti IS -- C.' r-I U) U1 tt to
in. S1
N U o N L) [ U) 1- o U II I.: .-1 O O t: .c [' 0 1- U r 1 r 1 • 1 t .t 411-r-1 ••1 in L a I a) n -.I I- n) t: 0 td J 10 )r l --- •r M rn
•rI , I •.1 11 '11
r '1 1 c') M no Er o 3 St N . i .1 in at O 1 .t .-I 'C �0 $1 $1 I N '- .-t U $1 G to U U E d r-I to u • Ul S 1 . 1 C U In Of r-I
nt t 1 f 1
Sa 0 0 ,J Id N U1 v .- [-: n) .-I [: U v r)1•-1 11)
n.): ") .
•- 0,
.
5 n
)
0/
.. ■--f (I) .-I 14 [. to U > 'U td C N • Si J 11 "1 s1 aCI -• II - v :3 t•
PI
i
U 0 n. -r C U t) p (4 8 u a) G n)J .I. n r I q) a t l in rt 0 •1 r l
;r; f;
Ir1 N j , tl Q. rd I) ' s to ' !) a' � 1 ;t fn Pt.41) ,U 1 }1 i [ .j N . 1) ,
)1 41 U CO S: O •r1 n) M In U) O ✓ t ni :j 0 C ii I.
= M n) 1,0 1.) .0 )44 'C E= t7) 0 tJ �, 'd /I 1 b E U r-1 • 1 i -C I: 9
P. I 11 11N 0, IA 1E1 4.1 b • c° a) O '- 3 U vIi I . ." N Id ) ° 0 N0 'U � ;d _ • : .I r ill r 1-1 N V) N •rt �.A ,J F ' I/ E I �, no fl) 1,Id to V N
• i' . 1 1 n ►U 'r l 6. L J . 0 A GFn . ,o n0� l I I � •C 1, 1 m o 'd v ' H N • a) , ; S/ to v 0r4 O `- t/ 'it a} C. al 1 'In•
Q b . F= -' l r-I Po U [; 1 r-I n : , 0,1-) 'n r-I 5, in I, n
t/ P-1 L, 0 0 N @ In iY, E�
. tN d •rI n • r n1 01 N l0 d J o ij i " U - a) ri o 0 .0 .,J ro " m 'Ti v 1 r n1 1 r• •.1 r I r-1 u, 0 . nl i H
[4 0 ' ott Id •c; tI n, b al •rl _v In , 1 1I n) $4 n) r fl) U Ft.ZQ U .. v r1 1J 0. 0 to f tr .I; 1n 1J 1• tr' rId S 1 •r{ '-1 U If d tU -,-- I-1 Uf IS p .1. .t) nt I: (:.1___ v O N r•t t U. Id 1 p, to .I [' ,t yn, [). .1 'IA o f f In 1 n) O Si
C1 1 CN r' 4
!al H + b 0 O ..r tl N N IO, �
! N Id U N � 1 f L ' II t 1 ni rf
E Id l J td • [, [: 'J (4), 0 'V tn 1.ij ••: 0 ^)
! N r ad V n L E 'r. N (), o I r: m is (. 1 If In 1;rni
,I )H HU11 A ra V 't- r-1 .0 6 to . • ' .0 .1 J O r a), 0 nr .I I 1 n'
I hi'6o a 0 d 0 Y. s. rn , r
w w V g ISd J In o O it 1-4 11 O n) u N > 'C •.I V t' .Q y 1tt U y
0, U t1 A) V t 0 0 al 3 r'1 Id nt • n� 1
O O H E M i W `) 14 •.I ►1 U 44 O 44 t-, y '.{ N It
. 1 u 0 U 11 •$ 1, l. r- I C y .� c 1 1. ,W •.O •1 atd J 'U)
ela U U tr•ri � [ U E Id 't7 a; U, So no :. ) n, .1 o'`.1/o R u N tn -•I .d U ~ 1, 'v 11 � m r. t. •ri 41 . • t. 0t C.. ' o
H H u re " E- U v p o u v N 0 a1 r-I U 0 v J , f 1 td
U u r f u o 'u� o f u
,� I z a u t a) U o ,t c 'u 11 ) i p•-i 1 r, r:t= al Qf tu o d u , ' ;t � r,f.n
O r.i u O O 0 a) /ti v �h+ -, .1i . I U E, .-I j1 .I I, t1 [ f 0 0 'd r' , I I
E fx af 2 U Vr N f U1.0 0 •, I tl
E U 5. u .r{ tif,.,U .-1 nit: .q 0 :_ •d .-1 't J r I to . 1X11
Id ••1 ♦o
] b O N .. • p .[U �, ,--1 g in US • to .-{ 01 5' id d ti,ta m e, ,A . 1 U I r: to
in h I .LI ) Id O C . to 1 ,
U y ► n r N U r, :, U Al A) in t
d U 6 U i u r) . i• ' 0 V t
t1 51 ri :' '-{ U N C: .. N .I 1r 1) nl S.' .. 'I 1 ••
td .1 v 1 c; v E- J •
,,, N In $1 r n1 1 I' ,'' Z
H o • ,J
• I . '- v 0 Qf 1 [ t: $1 . •Cy , U .t• t ,n L. $I U 'U i •
in t o
to Ul r+ Or . 'tf N o C Si t A; d 1 .1 t i U' Is a, .t ) , nt H
.-1 N v W r. to �I ft f )1 E U n nt -'1 t) i [A)S f F; 1 1 . 'II t: 1 1 II, in tt
Id ° N 3 U 0 ti r1 t ' ,) •r1 , •r (11 S, Ili -•1 I1 ft n) [: rn)f , II
t'l dO ' t+ ' '13 .`o! f: 1.1 ,Q S '1t n f) j, r;' 0 U
s t U r• 0 .r; , 0 to O i � • 3 , f) tQ..•Lf 'Ti .n1 r iA1 r. I 1� tt'. 1 u N 1,
- U ,IJ �O O
. i t1 In tI rI N 0 Id N II In ,
U ? I) Si�1 ) r 1 . n n) s? :1 n) I •I
'U I a I- i N '1 -.1 III Ft1
0 E
••I •
I I .n r S 1 (1{ •n,
'ft 1 . 1 no '11 . 1 on 1, n -.I St Id 'IS
III 'U I: N U [; re,, N 0 I) 11 0 n t In n1 I, [ , nt -'1
M t Ill v aU 1.4q u r I .r J t cr d nc no Is 'I ( no t :1
I- 0 '0 to .0 I- A '
N .-t to Li n
0 Q.-r1 I)
U. :; L) It 1 () I-1 0 t C
rn .1) U) M V n N U I t V n E r,/)I m m J 'U a it v) E. f1) in .,' F ' s), (). in () .ct rot r 1 •i 11 I ' i,
I 1 r' 1' n W U y U t-t
EI p
'7.
LJ 'LS 4) 4) 01 V ,-1 >,D. '..t 'u r► $-1 II-I IJ II, 'LS 3 ttt .14 ()1 r 1 ;s1 1+ 't 1 I'
rd 4) .r: fT Ci I . r-I .0 1 to 0 • l f) +1 1 4) $1 U r i 01 r' rI I 1 r 1
L L L •r1 [0 to b 11; r-1 +I.I 0 0 F[; L [11 nl •.1 ;› 1-t /_ S: r is
•v b 1 >, b H U, f; E-, ,) $• .r, 11 •cl 1) II) n -•I I I Cpl
1 •r1 .--1 'J rd 4-1 41 to 0 ITS 14 N it rn -r1 u .-t 11 , ' ns 111
rd U 10 .1 •r1 N � o `,a O A) 1 4) •r-I •1-I 41 -,1 U, (1 1)
1), U O .P: U w 0 -1 -.1, '� 4) [ . 1 :i U. t I I.
[, 4) t, .(l m .. I-. •I 11;
In b •r ts -94 N A, 1d +, r •.i �[ N 'n y >. I Its • n[
t) 'V [j 1 f? In
•
[; >' „1 a 4) .,1, 'ti 11111' .r1 3 m SI " VI •f) 10 t� (� •rt ,'j V'
[� ' V 'U u t♦ .ta .ti " 41 f r '1't N /1 n A) S' 3 () C I' I), ri
.0 b b ,-01 A V N �I `1-1 "t •(� �' $I U Al S; AI I) r m
QI a V r-1 t) �' r1 ti l� rd r I F • 111 -.I fl)
1-1 rl ,-4 ' t) dl ,-I U 0 �1 �: ,I to • [� [[.[ U .� Its tf.11 11, 1
w 3 u o to l i U d) .�0 N }1 fro •� bit) n M C m +1-1 t/ , A) 1,, 1 •n1 in .
s n1 (1 • to s 1 .11 1 • r[1
N-1 .d ' 'L, •t,' .-1 'v 1n b L r1 r1 IJ 'L� .} E (n )J 0) •r1 AI 1. F + f1 • 1 111 $1 r t
.t a� •4 In '-+ t. ,► o Gl, .d 0 rd to IJ A, to .0 s I Ft 'n r' 41 •t1 A, (,
I) b 1 '� r, L 4) m F Li sl •,1 -r1 , ,I, It f, 1' 11
N D, V •9-1 u 4) C] 4) > 'Li U L us Id 'ti i 3 A) 11. I 1- 111 n1 [= I
N k Q, a'd ri s-1 0 E .f; It r y,-.4 td -f I. in tt. C. 0 C; t , 11 (; ;= (r , 1 11f r=.
[l, y o E 0 41 0 p m N U= 1101 .r. dl .[; [, .4' IJ .v 1 O 111.3 N m 41 - • It
.1 , .)
-.4 ,s .r4 •rl E 11.,1 A) O r: 4) to )) 11) r-) to r� I; Ili �' . I •.1 r' Ir Ill',.ti/) 4) ra .tt 4) to Al a, 11 O N 111 s1 r1 1 III .1 U 11 1)' 10 , 1 to r' r
Li 1.4 ou 11 u ,� n1aI a1 t) a) AlN ,; t) O •'' 11 .1 "' to F [) 1:
fd •r-1 1V.1 U N ti [1 A) A, 'd 11 E M 01-.1 „f •r1 4! 1f O 11 V i i s I ' �i 1) as r*'.
fd t2, V f) 1' 41 r' r; r1 n, 11 1 n f, 4) 1 u) t1
en 114 11 J-. U r1 I ro '� t) 11 y N 11) to ,► 11, 'Ti A) •�ri 11 cV t 11 Iri 1
U) u q V 11 41 A, F• r 111 o to [J r1 t)1 U, a $1 ! 1). AI to I' ' 1 •rn f l .n
41 0 U 111 ' r: N m :�. '� i; s. m F? n► ,n 1 (r
n1
•,1 to U O w q '11 4) 11 4) 0 . r1 .,1 , 1 v Al •; [;
N to 4 10 11 11 r I U $1 �+ , 1n U 'I ,a •rl �+ rn C, t) I; '` I .1; 1n rn , I
rt ►� b y U1 f) 41 , Id I , r1, (3
to .R H In ' 1) . 4f .Q ri b' C. �' d •r1 $ r1 J 11 ,[' ,d 1. 'LI CI
,N u q ro t 1' 1 w o t11 In q 0 v, - 1
r) N A) 'd N 11 fn .-1 $l '- Al U , , ,u t) r, A)
j; U u Q 'tS Id .. n, rll ' 1 ,h 'v r 1 41 m r1 'd -.1 'LS .m L: '1-1 'U O ;1 In In In 111
1-I 41 q .4' 4) tl. L. 'U ,.I 'L) ) 1 I 1 [].'� a .11 4► c) A) r r '! ;'
to 41 u n, ?-1 1d m 1 1 S 1 AI I), I. • 1 1 (I,
F• u '� ,'� ,t In '� Q 'd r ( ,�� ro II 't� r 1 frd, �, U r 1, il 1A) $1 to in n) AI 11
0 3 b r-1 rid rn Ids ,t-t, 'd 11 i1 to " I II-, 1; U 4) +1) ,.�' -.1 4) s' .(J I-i
I >. r r-1 4) 1 t, IV go
4) % 4 U, ifs O r) 11 Al f) J (- ,. O r n•• E U + 4) to ti U Al O t)), fy iJ . , i '
to 4) .N U 4) c'L1 U to U 4' In 41 • u 11 I) n' 11 f11 I6 �1 M 111 t)� Ii t) 1. •it I f. c, A! [�
F O 3 ' U td U 1-1 b -.4 u v tr t+ t). ,o u 'II U1 �-I y, c' q O A) ) ns 1i i /1 1 F si, I I .'f r_
q ), q y. m cic, in 0 f1m (11 11 , s1
-PI N 1J C; 0, 41 b r !J •r1 I'1 to •ti 41 t1 ..-1 11 in ' in 41 •,I I: • U 1) n, . t 1: nt ()
i) pp, u 4 -i 4) U 41 41 •,-1 ^� to 'd .I; 0 N M to u t'1 L r 1 o 1n •1 t• ti '11 A) c ft .[ r, . . I 1
E r. _' to '� o >~ ti r-1 n O o in U -'I 11 -.1 •3 , -,1 •r l I: r I m -.1 •.1 .r, .. r. , '► ' 11
r, i •-t 41 .1 to - of .-1 •r1 ..-1 •.1 o 't1 r+f m A/ In 5 -.I . I 11 m > 1) UI (I A, 1 I
U q n (1i 11) B. t) y - -.1 O 1. 1d it U f) If ( 11 1 1 • U
III 0. .1 d$ N n 1. 1 p,-r1 }, m M O U' y •,1 I 'V to S, ..1 .t; 1; c1 Si >9-.1 ' -.1 1: 1 ' 1'1
1" 11 U 0 U L 13 't7 to U t=1 t i ❑,r-1 to .-, 1.1 o. cl „, O fp A, 1) a) n. F; t o A) 0 I . .c1 :I: 1- t (II III I ) f-1
O1 A) •r1 •--1 •r1 -rr -rl 11 111 . Id m $1 ,T ,- .Os IIIgyA11 oc) r-1 z c) fSZ If N .0 r " in f1
• III '[1 U 4l (]. 41 41 'Ti'( A) 1 4l A) Ci 111 Z .'7 11 .0 N ,. (1 1 sl �i (1
O -ri 41 4) 41 J: 01.$1 O d: 1 1 S S: rl .t; .1. R S -r l O 1) C) O .I1 ,_ ' . 1 •1 f )
7 'L1 I7.'d 0,no $1 F 111 L U F-I p, F, I) ►-) F. t) In (.) re. +l-I W. I eel .c) I) ( 1 .1; i,,I I 1'1
II I I I
I 1I
11 • 11• . ;1 11 ■ ) 0
In +n 1- m n, I ( • I y
.
111 -12 , . .,0AA,. .fr.p. k .w.
i 64. po zior,!. 0,10, 4$' .
X r _ _ -•
-,•-•-,--- -.--
- _.
4 • ../L_.Ao(*4.; -
..-• 4. . . -.
. . . .
.: 1
__.• ,
0 1 i -it •I .-.....li --.--.--Th
0: iiittP(‘..v i v .._,„. .., . -- it ..'7 I. - . . ..i?
En --I I*4.1 I
. , k"--
et.:7. 4trk: . . • . ' -.-k-iii • 4.— -A
,.. 4. . ..
. ---T-'. ..'-.N. ... -• . .-- - .
;Of s.43-- ...0 --.::: -.1...`11„ - , ; •;0!*:. I____t_i
. •t-, .
d f
I , i
- •..C.: I.
"C.
!
iv .... 1'.. •111111 ..
. . • Di --:• . •
,___.4. .earawswassulaliams . ' Mil • .. • •-• • - ..-4 • . r ,•• 1 , , ..(1164._ , ,
t .. T.-....--4,.t. .!
, .
: . L1 . ..... • ...: ip5., .. ., . J: 0:1,, t: : 41 r_, . ,... .
1..., • • , . .. .......•
.
. • .. ., ',13. •W' ).•
-•
p.,.. . i ...,: • • la 1 ...
It .* il
11; . ...... .•. ;-.• ..- gi 11. - I.
g -iti it- Eg' _ .
' • •'.--1••• *. --S' TIP.. , .ii
•&4•
1., i .....:• ....
r
r
\L. . •i •"*.. •
1 ..--•‘
...,.•• .,
• s.
. . _
• • • 4 ,
.
- -. 4-.•:1.'-
_
ai .....____
______________.. .. _. ____,___.__.40_________
0
-
v
ul
. .
U )›.
. ; . 4 2x.it b" t . .“A.•Wir, ,
:4 U)
fl
iit,--ip" i .____4. 1042• .
CI 111
■-11 I
LI Z :191u2s
i_ ;• . . •1(0-4,*
0 ?„.
I
. OA I.e. :- !
-1`%014:7 4
1.1 Iii _ ______ ____ _ -------
( .
s V\i • e?-:-.1... A.\'1 ,
I-1 ■ ... I
Iii
f 1
!-;
....
[ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT.
, I
-t-1 ` - Ay�c� cu < <( Y"-'f. I�e�r
. • � Kai\iK..t-1� G,-r. Opose..15 �44v-y0 / .
q!ti-r' Tv i..` A-il 14,.c •h..,4 5t,S i=e-•rr5) .
1 o+ frl- c& T l.e-- Pl 4,-i' e„. 4
_- .- • too a
-_. 5,‘,1-4... -0 ii p, k 0, 0B, - ,, ....,,.....„.1 (A.1
)14 ' ...)it,124 i ),c,$ '01 A +1 4 .44' 12 0 4 il s
. .- . 4-.1-6i,) _ _.-611.6.° 1 ,..(os
1
—7, / -,
/
- . - - .!,)- . ,/ _. Chicago Title
LehnV - 4®
f4'._:4"19-, 7 Z.2 ov2 'Hat t Gu•i-re.t,.T..‘,4 filQ•„A,,
4 - _ ' ayIfrb v ti/ 47 C'•c' 1 of 7/ Cam-!,o/
\ _1 ((.�!X'('� • , J( --� -, it, \ ya c Lc..2.k.. S.c fit-o4'(sip„ s�.t�,"/0.44
Viacti4 78 T•K rfr 625,10 3-14)} holF"K*ik 1 68'x A iw y #i$
, 7 d 4Z. 971ZY.
r pii R eK. ?r eiee,e •
Pei-, lc v ciw 1
C vets mss', Sod\`, • �.r_.-
o/a +l..
7%-f...02-apAare.. .44..,texf year
doroc. Gr '
• Nait64.
( QCa■t• ., ceft., ZA-01t -
*f --: r--ivv■I tult9riq
. ,e-,, ‘AltN• lik% W. Cf,J.) 0'. ., ,
$ Q • d
11,4,1.Cre#1C., ' ''116.: k% 1 ' V 11/3
\\ `\\ fi AMA' ft./00 K---
1 604G. ‘14,144--). -
_'4 • •
1,>� -r
Z ,(l ,
. • I 1 _
\■-.41,..1 1 r, ,
704 k .....c.‘ ,
--C.C. .. ::.1:._0_a__{.0.0-.1... -- - > -- ■ .
o \ RECEIVED
SEP 1 1 1,395
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, '
- la -2,towY-?ef,.ti;-- :----::_.. ... : , • ., .- - . '.
,i• - m.c.{ 004.s _________ . _,.,.. _0:14
i niii
JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Nov 15 '96 4:37 P.01/05
Fiume ..;. `Pa- —OD l£i
•
(PL47 Fitz
Facsimile Cover Sheet
__5o/r -xxr-
To: wiyi6frie..4
Company:
("(7,4 WI'25ktmoli
Phone: 'II 7)
Fax: C / 7.2?7
From:
r:-,, /Q
Company: JT Roth Construction, Inc.
12540 SW 68th Pkwy, Ste B
Tigard, OR 97223
Phone: (503) 639-2639
Fax: (503) 624-0239
Date:
Pages including this cover
page: -
RE: ,r, -
Plafredri e. 1.2(155 Sw 681
JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Nov 15 'q6 4:38 P. 02/05
PROM : 6.11-16 12 115 ##644 P.ø2/04
cfJ d \ \\5\4t
ratSV6-1 - 9LC7`\N -L\q
RETURN RECORDED DOCU MINTr 70:
Car HALL.RECORDS DLTARTMES'r
CITY OF TIGARD
13125 SW HO Blvd.
Turd,Or.57223
NO CHANCE IN TAX STATEMENT
EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND DRIVEWAY
FOR MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVEWAY ON ADJOINING PARCELS COMMERCIAL.USi
Date: 1.3 , 19 % Grantors: R&W Partners
12540 SW 68th Prkwy OB
Tigard, Or. 97223
Jacob T. Roth, Jr. and Theresa A. Roth
12540 SW 68th Prkwy#B
Tigard, Or_ 97223
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor R&W Partners is seized of an estate in fee simple
of a parcel ofland described as:
Lots 33 and 34, Block 29, West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of
Washington Co., State of Oregon.
WHEREAS, Grantor Jacob T. Roth, Jr. and Theresa A. Roth is seized of
an estate in fee simple of a parcel of land described as:
Lots 35 and 36, Block 29, West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of
Washington Co., State of Oregon.
and said two parcels of real estate adjoin each other.
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement desire to create a common
driveway and utility easement descAbed below on Lots 34 and 35 for the benefit of the
public for driveway purposes and the appropriate utilities to install, operate, maintain,
replace and change, in size, any of the utilities or pipelines below ground and related
equipment upon the easement described below for the benefit of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 33, 34, 35, and 36 of Block 29, West Portland Heights,
County of Washington, State of Oregon.
GRANT OF EASEMEn
Grantors hereby grant and convey from the date of the conveyance an
easement for a common driveway in favor of each of the parties to this Agreement over
the other parties above described real estate for the benefit of the Grantor in favor of the
Grantor in the other parties described property, together with an easement to the
appropriate utilities for utility lines and pipe purposes over and across the property owned
by Grantors described above,the easement being described as follows:
Easement For Utility and Driveway Pagel
JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Nov 1c "16 4:38 P.03/05
FRDM 1 .11-16 12215 #644 P.03/e4
RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT
A parcel of land in Block 29, West Portland Heights, a duly recorded plat
recorded in Book 1, Page 56, Washington County Plat Records, said parcel lying in the
N.E. 1/4 of Section 1,T.2S_,R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon,
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the west line of Lot 34,Block 29, West Portland Heights that
is N89%56' 33"E 100.00 feet and S00%00' 23"E 161.84 feet from the N.W. corner of
Lot 1, Block 29, West Portland Heights, said beginning point lying 12.00 feet south of the
north line of said Lot 34 when measured at right angles; thence, 12.00 feet south of and
parallel with said north line N89%57' 04"E 100.02 feet to the west right of way
line of S.W. 68th Avenue;thence, N00%00' 41"W 24.00 feet on said right of way line to
a point on the east line of Lot 35,1Block 29, West Portland Heights that, when measured
at right angles, is 12.00 feet north of the north line of said Lot 34, Block 29; thence,
leaving said right of way line, 12.00 feet north of and parallel with said north line,
S89%57' 04"W 100.02 feet to the west line of said Lot 35;thence, S00%00' 23"E
24.00 feet on said west line and the west line of said Lot 34 to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 2,400 square feet more or less.
Subject to easements of record.
"DRIVEWAY PURPOSES" DEFINE])
Driveway purposes as used in this easement means that all vehicles shall
use or travel across the right-of-way described above for purposes of ingress and egress
of motor vehicles, pedestrians, aril uses incidental to any lawtial use of the property.
"UTILITY EASEMENT" DEFINED
Utility easement is Fdefined as an easement to install, operate, maintain,
replace and change in size of any utilities or pipelines below ground and related equipment
upon the described easement property.
MAINTENANCE
The easement described above shall be maintained in good repair by the •
parties to this Agreement.
EASEMENT TO RUN WITH LAND
This easement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties
hereto in their respective servient estate so created and the parties further agree that it is a
covenant that shall run with the land.
Easement For Utility and Driveway Paget
JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Nov 15 '`16 4:39 P.04/05
r'MUM _I
_ _996.11-16 12116 8!644 P.04/04
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the
date and year above written.
GRANTOR:
Etyri) kiji./,- rri. -
Kenneth Wa mir -R&W artners --..A.._.
IP .tieriAll '1/4..at„..u...,_ &...f .titkt,_,)
• , .b T. Roth, . Theresa A. Roth
STATE OF OREGON, )
' ) ss,
County of .
f )
,
Dated th 111 day of NOIY.YiAbe r, 199i La
Personally appeared the within . I, . '
f�1NETH A. Part -rs) and
acknowledges the foregoing '. is
Before : ' 4t . %/.l�I I /��
otary Public '•:i reg• •
My commission expires: 7
STATE OF OREGON, `��' OFFICIAL.SEAL
i;'-' ���: (JNDA L MC OI TTIGAN
ss' --- OMMIBBIONNO.021M7
County of(A_1��11(■ I.+Y coMMlS$ION E PIKE$FFB.28,19s7
•Dated `''
flue � day of ki0(.164'‘,be1�, 199 �~�
Personally appeared the within named JACOB T RPTH, JR_ and a wled cs the
foregoing instrument to be his v. . tar• t,. .•.dee ., S
Before: % " II;� '
r'1•tary Public •r 0 gas i. '/ `�'�
My commission expires:,,-4- -Gt 7
i
OFFICIAL SEAL
STATE OF OREGON, ) ,. —.I• LINDA L.Mc 0crn c�N
L `- J NotAS�r pUBLIr✓.pRQGON
) s COMMISS4 N0.02447
County of g _ ,a ) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB 20,10P7,
D. . this M—ti of i-
y /i�1�w1, V , 199
Personally appeared the within • d THERESA . 'OTH and-acknowledges the
foregoing instrument to be his . : t , r
Before: /
• . otary Public a Orego.
My commission expires:, -- -3:1-17
Easement For Utility and Driveway OFFIGAi REAL
s'._,..: Z LINDA L MC 0a[�OAN Page3
� N92∎24: PUSLIC•OR100N
Nov 1` '6 4.40 P.05i05
JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239
M,►�) 14,
N1 0 S. W. FRANKLIN STREET • c'„
;r, 0
i 1 '∎- PQ° 0 260.00' (260.00'(1))
N 89'56'33 E (780.00'0))
1f 1
z ca 7a
200.01' o
200.00' 1 --.
100,00' (1Q0.00'(1}} • • -----r)
�— 100.01 (100.00'(1))
!P 1 ^ J I ADJUSTED 1 I 1 N 89'.0
IRNER - LINE I } 30.0
BLOCK29
BLOCK D 1
TRACT 1 0 o
r.,'''.
AREA=9985 S.F. °. TRACT 2 0
g
:T.: AREA.14,986 S.F. o
- I 2 FEE NO. 84-45985 c I g
• rn FEE NO. 94-107763 . ,°g
of !! •
vs T 2 rn 3 f
ci 00.01 1 (100.00'(1) (V II 7
O N 89'56' •- __ __L to
54 E o0 30 30
9 36 of 4.
`� r► a? EXISTING _� :. rn
o FEE NO. 90-23217 2 Z -Me- N —$ g
:=:17"
io
Are v N
o ^ w1.0.,0' 1 ''
o { r-
o 11 re :9' 7 04 E 110.0 A $ `" 5
g o
v , 4r
z 12 33 b
FEE NO. 90-01500
m _
o
0; FEE NO. 89-13519
V1 4 4
1Q O Y "
cv
® — (0 I
S • OG�
4 z ,
0.
tO
II1 01
2 2