Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1995-00021
SD R95 - 00021 POLLO CK/ ROTH OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0021 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING APPLICATION: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 4,505 square foot office building. The applicant has also requested Minor Land Partition approval to consolidate a total of five parcels and vacated areas which were previously a part of SW Gonzaga Street into two .48 acre parcels. Zone: Commercial Professional (C-P). Location: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900, 9000, 9001, 9003, 9004 and vacated areas which were previously a portion of the SW Gonzaga Street). The properties are located between SW 68th and SW 69th south of SW Franklin Street and north of SW Hampton Street. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to the following Conditions of Approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall amend the site plan to show how storm drainage will be provided.. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 2. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW 69th Avenue. STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit for any work within the public street, and/or for all connections to the sewer, storm drain, and/or water systems. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 1 4. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. The final original and two mylar copies shall be provided for signature of the City Engineer. STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering Department. 5. Provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat; or if not recorded with Washington County but has been approved by the City of Tigard the applicant shall have 30 days after recording with Washington County to submit the copy. STAFF CONTACT: Renae Simmons, Engineering Department. 6. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system for Lot 1. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 7. A standard concrete sidewalk shall be installed along the SW 68th Avenue frontage. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 8. The applicant shall pay the water quality and fees as established under Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two-part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 9. Revised site/landscape plans and permits shall be submitted for review and approval. Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. The Police Department reviewed this plan and commented that the parking lot and exterior area lighting will not be sufficient for security lighting purposes. A security lighting plan shall be provided for review and sign off by Mr. Kelley Jennings of the Police Department. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 2 b. The applicant shall provide tree protection measures to preserve trees which are proposed to be preserved off-site. The protection plan shall have been prepared by or under the direction of a consulting arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted as a part of a tree removal permit. The applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit prior to issuance of any construction permits. c. The applicant shall provide proof of a recorded Minor Land Partition to avoid constructing site improvements across the existing property lines. d. The applicant shall either agree to demolish the existing residence located on Tax Lot 9000 or convert the structure to commercial use as a Condition of Approval. Should the applicant choose to maintain the residential use of the structure the site plan must be revised to provide a land use buffer. At a minimum the buffer must be 20 feet in width and contain the equivalent to a row of trees at a certain spacing based on their height at maturity and shrubs of varying numbers based on their size at planting. The land use buffer must also contain either a row of evergreen shrubs, a five foot tall minimum fence, or an earthen berm with evergreen shrubs which will provide a continuous six foot screen within two years. e. The applicant shall provide a copy of the site plan for review and approval by an authorized franchised hauler for waste and recycling enclosure design and location. f. The applicant shall determine whether utilities exist within the vacated street right-of-way area. If no utilities are found to exist or if any existing utilities can be relocated to the satisfaction of the utility provider the applicant shall complete a public right-of-way vacation application to extinguish the existing public access rights. Alternatively the applicant may develop the site with the office building being developed near the northerly property line and thereby construct only parking lot related structures over the existing utility easement. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 3 TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 10. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT Background: This site has been zoned Commercial Professional since the City's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The City has no record of other development applications having been filed for these properties. Vicinity Information: The site is located between SW 68th and SW 69th Avenue south of SW Franklin Street and north of SW Hampton Street. The parcel to the west of the site is developed with a detached single family residence. The property immediately to the south is developed with parking areas associated with an office use developed between SW 68th and SW 69th Avenue. The areas immediately north of the proposed office site are developed with an existing office use. The areas which are north and west of the proposed office site are presently wooded and undeveloped. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is presently an undeveloped, wooded area. The site slopes at approximately a five percent rate towards the south west corner of the property. The applicant proposes to develop a 4,505 square foot office building with associated parking and landscaping. Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: FINDINGS: 1. Streets: Access is provided by SW 68th Avenue, a fully improved major collector street except for sidewalks. NOTICE OF DECISION SDP 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 4 Lot 2 fronts along SW 69th Avenue, a local street with half street improvements completed to the south within a 60 foot right-of-way There is an existing house on this lot; no development is proposed. Street improvements are not required until this lot develops or it is included in a street improvement Local Improvement District. 2. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service for Lot 1 is available from SW 68th Avenue; no extensions of public lines are required. Although not shown on the site plan, the existing house on Lot 2 appears to served by a septic system. Service is available from a line in SW 69th Avenue just south of the site and should be extended along with street improvements. 3. Storm Sewer: The property slopes in a southwesterly direction, away from SW 68th Avenue. The applicant states that this may require obtaining an easement to drain Lot 1 towards SW 69th Street. The roof and site drainage for the proposed building should be determined before the plat is recorded. Agency Comments: The Building Department reviewed this application and stated that the lots shall have been consolidated prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Police Department reviewed this plan and commented that the parking lot and exterior area lighting will not be sufficient for security lighting purposes and that a security lighting plan shall be provided for review and sign off. General Telephone and Electric (GTE) reviewed this plan and stated that the developer shall place conduits to GTE specifications. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The subject property is zoned Commercial Professional (C-P). The applicant is proposing to develop the site with a Professional Office building which is the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 5 primary permitted use of this zoning district. Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) defines the professional office use and allows this type of use in C-P Zoning District. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.64 the Commercial Professional Zoning District provides a series of development standards for new development. The application proposes to combine all or a portion of five existing tax lots and vacated areas into two newly reconfigured parcels. The applicant has also proposed to develop one of these parcels with an office building. Once reconfigured both sites would average 210 feet in width which is in excess of the 50 foot average width requirement. The current proposed development site is approximately .48 acres which exceeds the minimum lot size requirement. The future proposed development site is also .48 acres and complies with the minimum lot size requirement.. The applicant shall provide proof that the Minor Land Partition is recorded prior to issuance of Building Permits to avoid constructing proposed or future site improvements across the existing property lines. Upon review of the street vacation action for the 30 foot half street section of SW Gonzaga which was vacated back to the adjoining property owner it was determined that a reservation for utility purposes was preserved within the former public street right-of- way. The applicant has proposed to develop the office structure over this area. The applicant shall determine whether utilities exist within the vacated street right-of-way area. If no utilities are found to exist or if any existing utilities can be relocated to the satisfaction of the utility provider the applicant shall complete a public right-of-way vacation application to extinguish the existing public access rights. Alternatively the applicant may develop the site with the office building being developed near the northerly property line and thereby construct only parking lot related structures over the existing utility easement. Setback and Height: Section 18.64.050 does not require front, side or rear yard setbacks for development within the Commercial Professional Zoning District, except that clear vision areas and parking lot screening requirements must be met. The structure complies with the setback requirements as reviewed elsewhere within this report. The maximum building height is 45 feet in the Commercial Professional Zoning District for habitable structures. The height of the buildings roof line is proposed to be 16 feet in compliance with the maximum height standard. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100 requires that the applicant submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a minimum of 15% of the site. The C-P zone allows a maximum of 85% of the site to be covered with buildings and impervious surfaces. The applicant has submitted a plan indicating the type and location of landscaping to be provided. The proposed plan proposes 84% lot coverage with 16% of the site to be developed with landscaping which complies with landscape development standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 6 Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. The Landscape Plan proposes to provide a total of six Norway Maple trees spaced at a maximum of 30 feet on center along the SW 68th Avenue frontage. Due to their size at maturity of over 50 feet in height this specimen is permitted to be developed at up to 30 feet on center spacing and therefore complies with the requirement. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall also be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The preliminary site plan provides planting details concerning the location of existing and new trees which are proposed to provide shade for the 22 parking spaces. A total of 13 Chanticlear Pear Trees and Pagoda Dogwood Trees are to be provided for this purpose which greatly exceeds the minimum ratio of one tree for each seven parking spaces. Landscape islands require a minimum of three feet of width. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided landscape islands which vary between four and nine feet in width. The landscape plan provides a planting design and orientation in such a manner that the proposed plantings are protected from damage by vehicles using the adjoining parking spaces. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between different types of land uses. A land use buffer is required because the adjoining properties to the west are developed and planned for residential use. The proposed parking lot and other site improvements directly adjoin a non-conforming residential dwelling to the west of the site. The buffer standards are found to be applicable to the west. A 20 foot buffer is required where the site adjoins neighboring residences to the west. No buffer has been provided. The applicant has agreed to demolish the residence or convert the structure to commercial use as a Condition of Approval. Should the applicant choose to maintain the existing use of the structure the site plan must be revised to provide a land use buffer. At a minimum the buffer must be 20 feet in width and contain the equivalent to a row of trees at a certain spacing based on their height at maturity and shrubs or varying numbers based on their size at planting. The land use buffer must also contain either a row of evergreen shrubs, a five foot tall minimum fence, or an earthen berm with evergreen shrubs which will provide a continuous six foot screen within two years. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 - POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 7 Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance from the corner of two intersecting street right-of-ways. The clear vision rule also includes triangular areas on either side of proposed driveway(s). For driveways in excess of 24 feet in width such as those proposed to serve this site the clear vision area is measured a 30 foot distance back from the driveway and 30 feet along the adjoining street right- of-way and then connecting these two points. The plan as proposed complies with these requirements at the intersection of each driveway within the parking lot. The applicant has proposed to plant new landscape materials within the clear vision area adjoining the proposed driveway onto SW 68th Avenue These new planting materials do not conflict with the clear vision requirements as shown on the proposed Landscape Plan. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106 requires a minimum of one off-street parking space for each 350 square feet. The applicant has proposed to develop 4,505 square feet of gross floor area and provide a total of 22 parking spaces which exceeds the minimum requirement of 13 spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA): Revised regulations became effective on January 26, 1992. A minimum of one disabled parking spaces are required if 1-25 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides one disabled parking space near the main entrance which complies with the minimum requirement. Due to its location adjoining the main building entrance walkway, handicapped persons would not be required to cross driveways to access the building. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106 requires one bicycle parking rack for each 15 required parking spaces in any commercial development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian pathways. The current site plan provides a bicycle rack located around the west side of the proposed office building. The proposed location complies with the minimum standard because it is within 50 feet of the main building entrances. Access: Section 18.108 requires that where up to 99 parking spaces are required, that one access point with a minimum width of 24 feet of paved width and 30 feet of total width be constructed. The preliminary site plan proposes to develop a driveway onto SW 68th Avenue. A total of 13 parking spaces are required to serve the proposed use. If the driveway provides for future shared access to the proposed development site to the west it is expected that this driveway would be sufficient to serve new development on adjoining properties where NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 8 such new development does not exceed 30,100 square feet of gross floor area of office space. The access which has been proposed is 24 feet in paved width and 34 feet in total width which complies with the minimum width requirements. The applicant has not applied for Site Development Review on areas shown to be an access easement on the proposed westerly development site. Because new regulations are in effect for all new development as it relates preservation of trees it is impossible to review through this application whether the proposed access easement is appropriately located as shown on the site plan given the existing trees on the future development site. It is recommended that no such access easement be recorded until such time as the adjoining property has gone through Site Development Review and a Certified Arborculturist has determined that the trees within this area are not viable for preservation and a replacement plan has been approved for Significant Trees in excess of 12 inches in diameter. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of all new structures to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in which pedestrians must cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum curbed vertical separation or a minimum three foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet where appropriate pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts. The site plan as proposed provides a five foot wide sidewalk linkage to SW 68th Avenue which does not require pedestrians to cross the proposed parking lot. The building has also been designed to abut SW 68th Avenue which is served by TRI-MET's Beaverton- Lake Oswego 78 cross-town transit route. Signs: Section 18.114 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Commercial Professional Zoning District. All future proposed signage shall be reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporate functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by the franchised haulers. The site plan provides a trash and recycling enclosure. It is recommended that the applicant contact the franchised hauler and have the enclosure design reviewed and approved in terms of size and design to ensure ease of site servicing. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 9 Tree Removal: This application was when the previous regulations concerning tree removal were in affect. Under these requirements Section 18.150.020(E) required that a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground level. The applicant has proposed to remove a total 26 existing significant trees or groups of trees in excess of six inches in diameter as measured four feet above the existing grade elevations. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Section 18.150.030(A): 1. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; If preserved in place certain trees would interfere with the construction of necessary site improvements such as driveways, service areas and parking lot areas. Locating the proposed development on alternate portions of the site is difficult due to the limited site size and the dispersed nature of the existing significant trees on site. To preserve trees in substantial numbers would require that the site improvements be greatly reduced in size. 2. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; See statement above. 3. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; Due to the limited slope of the property no unusual erosion problems, slope instability or drainage problems are expected either on-site or off-site with the removal of these trees. The recommended conditions of approval included a requirement that the applicant demonstrate that off-site drainage will not adversely impact properties which are upstream and downstream of the subject property. 4. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; A tree protection plan shall be provided to ensure that removal of existing trees does not impact existing off-site trees. The tree protection plan shall be prepared by a consulting arborist. 5. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and. The applicant has not proposed to maintain any of the existing trees The applicant has provided approximately four times the minimum required number of parking lot trees as mitigation for the loss of trees. Due to the need to construct the structure, parking areas and driveways it is not possible to preserve the existing trees in substantial numbers. The site is not prominently located topographically and is not visible from large numbers of adjoining properties. 6. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any,will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. Because of the limited area which will either be developed or preserved with the existing trees it does not appear feasible to plant replacement trees beyond the 19 total trees proposed as street and parking lot trees. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 10 Based on these findings removal of the trees shown within the existing conditions plan complies with the applicable criteria for tree removal. Minor Land Partition Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Minor Land Partition: 1. The proposal conforms with the city's comprehensive plan; 2. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; 3. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; 4. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title; and 5. All proposed improvements meet city and applicable agency standards(Ord.89-06; Ord.83-52). Both of the proposed parcels would be approximately .48 acres or 20,908 square feet complies with the minimum size requirements for properties within the Commercial Professional Zoning District. Each proposed lot also exceeds the 6,000 square foot lot minimum in accordance with Criteria #1. Chapter 18.92 is determined to be inapplicable because the site is zoned for residential use. Upon completion of the review period the applicants request will have complied with the statutory requirements of the City of Tigard for review of this application as required by Criteria #2. Adequate public facilities are available or have been required to be provided to serve this site as set forth in Sections 18.164.030 (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drain) as required by Criteria #3 as reviewed within the Engineering Department's comments contained elsewhere within this report. Through the building permit review the roof and site drainage for the new office building to be built on the site will be required to be directed to a public facility. Prior to development a hydrology and hydraulics analysis will be required to analyze impacts to upstream and downstream properties. The new parcels do not exceed a two and one half to one length to depth ratio. For this reason the proposed parcel configurations conform with size and dimensional requirements of the Commercial Professional Zoning District as required by Criteria #4. All proposed improvements will comply with City and applicable agency standards in satisfaction with Criteria #5 as reviewed through the building permit plan check NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 - POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 11 review process. The newly created parcels are not required to comply solar access requirements because they are zoned for commercial use. Section 18.162.050 contains the following provisions for lots created through the partition process: A. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. B. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. C. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. D. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. E. Front Yard Determination on flag lots: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. F. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. G. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. H. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. I. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. J. Where landfill andlor development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrianlbicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrianlbicycle pathway plan. Criteria A, B, C, and D are satisfied. The parcels will exceed the area requirement of 6.000 square feet set forth within the Commercial Professional Zoning District. Each newly created parcel would have in excess of 15 feet of direct frontage on a NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 12 private street in satisfaction of the lot frontage requirement in Criteria C. Standards for setbacks, landscaping and clear vision requirements are reviewed elsewhere within this report in satisfaction of Criteria D. Criteria E and F are not applicable because the new lots are not flag lots in terms of access frontage to a publicly dedicated street. For this reason a land use buffer screen along the properties existing publicly dedicated street is not required. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards thereby satisfying Criteria G. Criteria H which requires reciprocal access maintenance agreement to maintain a joint access easement is not required because a flag lot parcel configuration has not been proposed. Criteria I is satisfied through the requirement for construction of a 24 foot minimum driveway width driveway from SW 68th Avenue. Criteria J has been met because the parcel is not located within the one hundred year flood plain or in areas with slopes exceeding 25 percent. This portion of SW 68th Avenue does not abut an existing bike and/or pedestrian path. Transportation Planning_ Rule: The portion of the Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8, 1994, that applies to this application is OAR,660-12.045(4)and(5). This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following measures: a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and, c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street. If it is not possible to orient an entrance facing the street the entrance shall be as close as possible to a transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and pedestrian amenities are required to display the main entrance and direct pedestrians to that entrance. The site has direct frontage on SW 68th Avenue which is a transit served street. The proposed office building has been located within four feet of the street to provide increased pedestrian accessibility. A direct pedestrian walkway connection has been proposed from the main building entrances to SW 68th Avenue. The walkway has been designed to encourage pedestrian use because the walkway does not require that pedestrians cross portions of the parking lot, the driveway or service areas to access the building from the street. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 13 SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON DECEMBER 26, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(Al and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. December 26, 1995. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Division (639-4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 j s'.. 2 / ----71'7 3 ' ; - 1 _ --, ,z-- 12/14/95 r �/ PR PARED BY: Mark Roberts ; DATE L Associate Planner ((I/44'- ' / I/ 12/14/95 APPROVED BY: Richard B dorff DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 14 - - - - . g - . `-- _I 1 30' 30' 9 in I 10 35 4?' -- - - - - --- J -- I 100.02' 11 34 -- - 12 - -- - - - 33 a 13 '29 32 c, Q 0 14 \.O 31 in co oi I -- z 15 `�„tio _ 30 - W W 0 `��16 2 9 Z z 100.03' a wZ . Q > 1, .,3`'�, 28 D. Q '''' - ---- I- i 16 ai 27 0 N.- 1 � -- -- - - - `D i CC co Pte, #2 1, >.RC, #1 I a I C•C'' 1 I I co 30' 30 LL I I 23 0 19 20 21 22 23 4 25 26 ___I _ I _ 1 ._ .— __ . 1_ i _l._. G 30.00'—\ �” rn 100.05' J 29.92'♦` -- 4 29.98' j U rr) PLOT PLAN 1 CASE NO. 1 EXHIBIT MAP 1 MLP95-0013 rn _ — I -- I LtAM pocK l47(.4c'IDA - NI, • e.�050 f'rltq ' - I - iiPti 1 • ,2 -n in P3 .n " �l y '^ D m A 0 i r7,-•1.1 00 m v , N E -n ■ —ate GI 00 , 1 ' Wkr•& I 4: •. li • 1 ' . , r . , • i -- cp cc Rl _ -�; . L 4t vi (AD( 4,vt w 144. `' 6.41",•4 Jiff P&G pt co Z I W N • , lit • • .. i r Y 1-..4-..‘„•h jr. S.W. 68TH AVENUE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT . a 1 / I ea Boa ____1J r 1_.ED 1.1 I (T,, E\. —um l I 1 1 IN V Y , E-27 " rr 4 srm ` 0 ....`.�I _r-NN ..„4 , ■••,,, i .,. hi:5Zitt C , - ,'■ . .,..--,...--.<1,, . /....a.. .....\\c.3. :.:*',' ,...:t7.;. -.-..L__ )____ iA '1:: Z 7_1_ a. ;"--T.'" \ ''.._:.-1'..4,t-:- .1 ..� s- In ' l n ; aj , ; 1 I R,. ,!II4 '�.:>; �.. x ZN ST (5 1/*°"--4 1'� 1 `\ f�� I r ■ I i "a 3 • r SITE -- >>>> Sr— PHIL LEWI , „ \ ELEMENTARY_'r"' I l t--1-c - Z ;- _ 15- __� a E-3t ` k � \ / \ Ili Lei^^. E-32 • n Q i f ! G.... .\�• E-33 / .\. ''''" ' ■—1 - s ......_\...„._ini - --:24:\' ',‘ ./ :. L-4--;'—T-- ..--H--- ; i . vAi , \ 1 Frp _ !! ! i i ' < ';' ,-'3'4t\\'\.: 1—p .: , i _ ,.... _ , %if', '.. \.' .- . I , i Hle-‘ R=25--- - (L._,- Ilh (..../ A I O zP• _ ' o _ co C AND: — _ I_A '; 1 N i vI li VICINITY ) 1 CASE NO. SDR 95-0021 EXHIBIT' MAP I MLP 95-0013 1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4', I 1FY OF TIGARD 1/6 OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS W• DATE: November 8, 1995 TO: Lee Walker, Unified Sewerage Agency/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING ` The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 1AA, tax lots 8900, 9001, 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 20. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written comments provided below: 00 C K Y QUA t;4'1 1 w etti y Q u A K+is 4.1 YK 04if 124 oWwu.i 5 k,b evi ttit I p I4 s JO het a d d rt s 5 L.a �',MM o v 2 a rre, SA.r.1cu caws e L4,l f Y'tvna h 1 u , ' , • Nov t ,� 1� �j E �9$ By • '► (release provide the forlinving information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Wit, I,Ia,Z.. Phone Number(s): 1,,,kie t b QI I SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING O 11/8/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ,� feitCEIVED PLANNING ZIN V �JI"° �J�yP �� q <�� NO V 2 91995 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE AND �c 1 J� BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive• P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526-2469• FAX 526-2538 RF 8 R ES GJ November 21, 1995 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Pollock/Roth Office Building 12500 S.W. 68th Avenue SDR 95-0021 Dear Mark: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code, (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. This review shall become a part of the approved plans and attached thereto. Hydrants shall be placed so that all portions of exterior walls of buildings, measured along the outside and along access roadways, are no more than 500 feet away for private residences or 250 feet for all commercial buildings (500 feet for commercially sprinklered buildings). Location of hydrants, and supply piping to said hydrants for water supply shall be approved by this office. Please provide information or details on existing or proposed location of fire hydrants. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469 referring to File Number: 396-95. Sincerely, Jerry Renfro, DFM Plans Examiner JR:kw "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Mark Roberts October 9, 1995 FROM: Greg Berry$ SUBJECT: SDR 95-21, MLP 95-0013 Pollock/Roth Office Building Description: Applicant is requesting approval to develop a 4,500 square foot office building and to combine 4 lots. Findings: 1. Streets: Access is provided by SW 68th Avenue, a fully improved major collector street except for sidewalks. Lot 2 fronts along SW 69th Avenue, a local street with half street improvements completed to the south within a 60 foot right-of-way There is an existing house on this lot; no development is proposed. Steet improvements are not required until this lot develops or it is included in a street improvement Local Improvement District. 2. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service for Lot 1 is available from SW 68th Avenue; no extensions of public lines are required. Although not shown on the site plan,the existing house on Lot 2 appears to served by a septic system. Service is available from a line in SW 69th Avenue just south of the site and should be extended along with street improvements. 3. Storm Sewer: The property slopes in a southwesterly direction, away from SW 68th Avenue. The applicant states that this may require obtaining an easement to drain Lot 1 towards SW 69th Street. The roof and site drainage for the proposed building should be determined before the plat is recorded. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95-21 Pollock/Roth Office Building PAGE 1 Because of the small size of the proposed development (Lot 1) a fee in-lieu of an on-site facility should be allowed. Recommendations: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 1. The applicant shall amend the site plan to show how storm drainage will be provided.. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry,Engineering Department(639-4171). 2. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW 69th Avenue. 3. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit for any work within the public street, and/or for all connections to the sewer, storm drain, and/or water systems. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman,Engineering Department(639-4171). 4. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. The final original and two mylar copies shall be provided for signature of the City Engineer. STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering Department(639-4171) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED: ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95-21 Pollock/Roth Office Building PAGE 2 1. Provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat; or if not recorded with Washington County but has been approved by the City of Tigard the applicant shall have 30 days after recording with Washington County to submit the copy. STAFF CONTACT: Renae Simmons, Engineering Department(639-4171) 2. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system for Lot 1. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott,Building Division(639-4171). 3. A standard concrete sidewalk shall be installed along the SW 68th Avenue frontage. 4. The applicant shall pay the water quality and fees as established under Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two-part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right- of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. APPROVED Randall R. Wooley, City t ineer N:\ENGINEER\sdr95-21 ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95-21 Pollock/Roth Office Building PAGE 3 V■ C}FY OF TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOV 281995 DATE: November 8. 1995 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 1AA, tax lots 8900, 9001, 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 20. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: �I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.� 1UV'" t,t Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 11/8/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 11/20/1995 10: 29 5036492739 TUWD ,, / PAGE 04/04 RECEIVED PLANNING >,(o` • Uv " ,11 I1 NOV 2 0 1995 CITY Or TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 8. 1995 TO: Tualatin Valley Wa..t_er District Adminis r five Offices FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: u • - _ Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 95-OM/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 ➢ POLLOCKIRQTH QF�IGE jailILDING Q The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 1AA, tax lots 8900, 9001, 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18,114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 20. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: f �► ((Please provide t6r fdro.ui'np informaaion) Name of Person(s)Commenting: Il A,_t,/' Phone Number(s): ‘42 �/ sDR 95-0021IMLP 95.0013 POLLOCKfROTn OFFICE BUILDING 11/195 PROPOSAL,REOUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED P NNING V v') NOV 15 CR-, IGARD � OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 8, 1995 TO: Brian Moore, Portland General Electric FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING : The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 IAA, tax lots 8900, 9001, 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 20. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PCease provide the forkrwing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting:�'�-Q Phone Number(s): iV - SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 11/8/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS V'' nn vv .� RECEIVED PLANNING 4 NOV 15 1995Y OF TIrGi ARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 8, 1995 TO: Jim Wieskamp, General Electric Engineering Office FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING . The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all. or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 1AA, tax lots 8900, 9001, 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: LX-v1/4.1.4)4-)1:42_ `co PLA-LE CCJNC i 5 P4 PECLUC4TioN)5 t ►► (Please provide the foffowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): 010---S&43 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 11/8/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS is-yt7,1 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: November 8, 1995 VI 3 7995 TO: Dave Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 1AA, tax lots 8900, 9001, 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 7/1 (/ �' .Q1.4/p� I � 4 4 4 1 f )71 , tvV 9— Tv"- V2 c es, (Tlease provide the foil-awing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): > 7 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 1118/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS •c�u rLANNING NO RECEIVED PLANNIN i99� . I /� CITY OF TIGARD NOV 13 199 1Y V OREGON E COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMM '\\N DATE: November 8, 1995 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 IAA, tax lots 8900, 9001, 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 20, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: -L FAN:Dpocseci pf0t-AR-1.-41 f41" 4! A4 _.4L—.741141 - ■ La4/10/dea ('lease provide thefolow:'ng information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: \.. Phone Number(s): SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 11/8/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 2, 1995 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021/MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 1 AA, tax lots 8900, 9001 , 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 13, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 11/2/95 PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS `40,Q qc- D NOTIFICATION REQUEoST FOR Lo lc- a®/r3 UOATIOros CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (circle one) —CIT Area: (N) (S) (E) (0 •* Placed for review in Library CIT Book** _CPO NO. CITY DEPARTMENTS _ DO V.kt EPTJDave Scott, wag.onai DEPTJKeliy Jennings _OP TIONS/John Acker, mint.sorsr. _CITY ADMINJCathy Wheatley,OW Mr. EN PTJMichael Anderson, o ...view eng E.DEV. DEPTJD.S.T.'S _ADV. PLNGJCarol Landsman, senior manner TER DEPTJMIchael Miller,ovarationsMgr. SPECIAL DISTRICTS FIRE MARSHALL _ NIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY ----TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa.County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA.CO.DEPT.OF LAND USE&TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. #16, Suite 540 Mel Hule (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis (CPA's) — STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ODOT/REGION 1 _Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning _Scott King (CPA's) Portland,OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland, OR 97209-4037 _Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street, N.E. _OTHER _ _CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem,OR 97310-0590 Larry Conrad, Senior Planner _CITY OF PORTLAND PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM Planning Director Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland, OR 97204 _CITY OF KING CITY Tigard, OR 97281-3483 City Manager _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 15300 SW 116th _CITY OF TUALATIN City Manager King City, OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 `` // SPECIAL AGENCIES L- EN CERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Jim Wieskamp, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard, OR 97281-3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, OR 97005 _NW NATURAL GAS CO. vnonr.00n rn-tw _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer Fax MOM m-aoa Jason Hewitt Kim Knox, Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland, OR 97232 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M.Forney,PLS-Project Eng. 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave., Room 324 Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Union Station Portland, OR 97209 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _AERONAUTICS DIVISION(ODOT) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _US POSTAL SERVICE _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H. PARK _FISH &WILDLIFE Randy Hammock, Growth Cord. _PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland, OR 97229-9998 _U.S.ARMY CORPS.OF ENGINEERS _OTHER ogm\pattyvanoticrost MAILING RECORDS Aek Zit 1 City of Tigard,Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED -) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Check boa above,if applicable} (check appropriate box below) (Enter Public Hearing Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council V( That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR: (Check box above,if applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director 0 That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Check box above,if applicable} (check appropnate box below) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council -1 That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of whic is ttached, marked Exhibit "A", was -iied to each I: ed pers"n(s) at the address) shown on the attached lis s), marked Exhibit "B" • he - Y4- /4 .y of Al....‘ �/,' 199._ , and deposited in the Unit d States Mail:- •e 4' . %- • Al ' ' 4,,;_i 199 , postage prepaid. _ 1dM R-ep d Notice r/L Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / il day of AM A% , 16 f''z OFFICIAL SEAL t 2 ,,-.. . DIANE M JELOREGO /' /j NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON YC I COMMISSION PO. BER NOTARY PUBLIC ig EGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 My Commission E Aires: / 7' :%'FILE INFO.: � NAMES)• /�iGL'�-:4 /w A C/,It1/�— 6/" CASE NO.(S): JDR / Woc ova) / u /j1D13 TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: X. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0021 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING APPLICATION: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 4,505 square foot office building. The applicant has also requested Minor Land Partition approval to consolidate a total of five parcels and vacated areas which were previously a part of SW Gonzaga Street into two .48 acre parcels. Zone: Commercial Professional (C-P). Location: 12500 SW 68th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900, 9000, 9001, 9003, 9004 and vacated areas which were previously a portion of the SW Gonzaga Street). The properties are located between SW 68th and SW 69th south of SW Franklin Street and north of SW Hampton Street. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to the following Conditions of Approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall amend the site plan to show how storm drainage will be provided.. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 2. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW 69th Avenue. STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit for any work within the public street, and/or for all connections to the sewer, storm drain, and/or water systems. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 1 4. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. The final original and two mylar copies shall be provided for signature of the City Engineer. STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering Department. 5. Provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat; or if not recorded with Washington County but has been approved by the City of Tigard the applicant shall have 30 days after recording with Washington County to submit the copy. STAFF CONTACT: Renae Simmons, Engineering Department. 6. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system for Lot 1. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 7. A standard concrete sidewalk shall be installed along the SW 68th Avenue frontage. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 8. The applicant shall pay the water quality and fees as established under Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. NOTE: This is a two-part fee which is paid at different times. The first part is paid with any associated public improvements which is for that portion of the development which increases the impervious area within the public right-of-way. The second part is paid at Building Permit issuance which is for each individual lot. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 9. Revised site/landscape plans and permits shall be submitted for review and approval. Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. The Police Department reviewed this plan and commented that the parking lot and exterior area lighting will not be sufficient for security lighting purposes. A security lighting plan shall be provided for review and sign off by Mr. Kelley Jennings of the Police Department. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 2 b. The applicant shall provide tree protection measures to preserve trees which are proposed to be preserved off-site. The protection plan shall have been prepared by or under the direction of a consulting arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted as a part of a tree removal permit. The applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit prior to issuance of any construction permits. c. The applicant shall provide proof of a recorded Minor Land Partition to avoid constructing site improvements across the existing property lines. d. The applicant shall either agree to demolish the existing residence located on Tax Lot 9000 or convert the structure to commercial use as a Condition of Approval. Should the applicant choose to maintain the residential use of the structure the site plan must be revised to provide a land use buffer. At a minimum the buffer must be 20 feet in width and contain the equivalent to a row of trees at a certain spacing based on their height at maturity and shrubs of varying numbers based on their size at planting. The land use buffer must also contain either a row of evergreen shrubs, a five foot tall minimum fence, or an earthen berm with evergreen shrubs which will provide a continuous six foot screen within two years. e. The applicant shall provide a copy of the site plan for review and approval by an authorized franchised hauler for waste and recycling enclosure design and location. f. The applicant shall determine whether utilities exist within the vacated street right-of-way area. If no utilities are found to exist or if any existing utilities can be relocated to the satisfaction of the utility provider the applicant shall complete a public right-of-way vacation application to extinguish the existing public access rights. Alternatively the applicant may develop the site with the office building being developed near the northerly property line and thereby construct only parking lot related structures over the existing utility easement. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 3 TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 10. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT Background: This site has been zoned Commercial Professional since the City's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The City has no record of other development applications having been filed for these properties. Vicinity Information: The site is located between SW 68th and SW 69th Avenue south of SW Franklin Street and north of SW Hampton Street. The parcel to the west of the site is developed with a detached single family residence. The property immediately to the south is developed with parking areas associated with an office use developed between SW 68th and SW 69th Avenue. The areas immediately north of the proposed office site are developed with an existing office use. The areas which are north and west of the proposed office site are presently wooded and undeveloped. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is presently an undeveloped, wooded area. The site slopes at approximately a five percent rate towards the south west corner of the property. The applicant proposes to develop a 4,505 square foot office building with associated parking and landscaping. Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: FINDINGS: 1. Streets: Access is provided by SW 68th Avenue, a fully improved major collector street except for sidewalks. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 4 Lot 2 fronts along SW 69th Avenue, a local street with half street improvements completed to the south within a 60 foot right-of-way There is an existing house on this lot; no development is proposed. Street improvements are not required until this lot develops or it is included in a street improvement Local Improvement District. 2. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service for Lot 1 is available from SW 68th Avenue; no extensions of public lines are required. Although not shown on the site plan, the existing house on Lot 2 appears to served by a septic system. Service is available from a line in SW 69th Avenue just south of the site and should be extended along with street improvements. 3. Storm Sewer: The property slopes in a southwesterly direction, away from SW 68th Avenue. The applicant states that this may require obtaining an easement to drain Lot 1 towards SW 69th Street. The roof and site drainage for the proposed building should be determined before the plat is recorded. Agency Comments: The Building Department reviewed this application and stated that the lots shall have been consolidated prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Police Department reviewed this plan and commented that the parking lot and exterior area lighting will not be sufficient for security lighting purposes and that a security lighting plan shall be provided for review and sign off. General Telephone and Electric (GTE) reviewed this plan and stated that the developer shall place conduits to GTE specifications. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The subject property is zoned Commercial Professional (C-P). The applicant is proposing to develop the site with a Professional Office building which is the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 5 primary permitted use of this zoning district. Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) defines the professional office use and allows this type of use in C-P Zoning District. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.64 the Conunercial Professional Zoning District provides a series of development standards for new development. The application proposes to combine all or a portion of five existing tax lots and vacated areas into two newly reconfigured parcels. The applicant has also proposed to develop one of these parcels with an office building. Once reconfigured both sites would average 210 feet in width which is in excess of the 50 foot average width requirement. The current proposed development site is approximately .48 acres which exceeds the minimum lot size requirement. The future proposed development site is also .48 acres and complies with the minimum lot size requirement.. The applicant shall provide proof that the Minor Land Partition is recorded prior to issuance of Building Permits to avoid constructing proposed or future site improvements across the existing property lines. Upon review of the street vacation action for the 30 foot half street section of SW Gonzaga which was vacated back to the adjoining property owner it was determined that a reservation for utility purposes was preserved within the former public street right-of- way. The applicant has proposed to develop the office structure over this area. The applicant shall determine whether utilities exist within the vacated street right-of-way area. If no utilities are found to exist or if any existing utilities can be relocated to the satisfaction of the utility provider the applicant shall complete a public right-of-way vacation application to extinguish the existing public access rights. Alternatively the applicant may develop the site with the office building being developed near the northerly property line and thereby construct only parking lot related structures over the existing utility easement. Setback and Height: Section 18.64.050 does not require front, side or rear yard setbacks for development within the Commercial Professional Zoning District, except that clear vision areas and parking lot screening requirements must be met. The structure complies with the setback requirements as reviewed elsewhere within this report. The maximum building height is 45 feet in the Commercial Professional Zoning District for habitable structures. The height of the buildings roof line is proposed to be 16 feet in compliance with the maximum height standard. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100 requires that the applicant submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a minimum of 15% of the site. The C-P zone allows a maximum of 85% of the site to be covered with buildings and impervious surfaces. The applicant has submitted a plan indicating the type and location of landscaping to be provided. The proposed plan proposes 84% lot coverage with 16% of the site to be developed with landscaping which complies with landscape development standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 6 Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. The Landscape Plan proposes to provide a total of six Norway Maple trees spaced at a maximum of 30 feet on center along the SW 68th Avenue frontage. Due to their size at maturity of over 50 feet in height this specimen is permitted to be developed at up to 30 feet on center spacing and therefore complies with the requirement. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall also be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The preliminary site plan provides planting details concerning the location of existing and new trees which are proposed to provide shade for the 22 parking spaces. A total of 13 Chanticlear Pear Trees and Pagoda Dogwood Trees are to be provided for this purpose which greatly exceeds the minimum ratio of one tree for each seven parking spaces. Landscape islands require a minimum of three feet of width. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has provided landscape islands which vary between four and nine feet in width. The landscape plan provides a planting design and orientation in such a manner that the proposed plantings are protected from damage by vehicles using the adjoining parking spaces. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between different types of land uses. A land use buffer is required because the adjoining properties to the west are developed and planned for residential use. The proposed parking lot and other site improvements directly adjoin a non-conforming residential dwelling to the west of the site. The buffer standards are found to be applicable to the west. A 20 foot buffer is required where the site adjoins neighboring residences to the west. No buffer has been provided. The applicant has agreed to demolish the residence or convert the structure to commercial use as a Condition of Approval. Should the applicant choose to maintain the existing use of the structure the site plan must be revised to provide a land use buffer. At a minimum the buffer must be 20 feet in width and contain the equivalent to a row of trees at a certain spacing based on their height at maturity and shrubs or varying numbers based on their size at planting. The land use buffer must also contain either a row of evergreen shrubs, a five foot tall minimum fence, or an earthen berm with evergreen shrubs which will provide a continuous six foot screen within two years. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 7 Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge,planting, fence, wall structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance from the corner of two intersecting street right-of-ways. The clear vision rule also includes triangular areas on either side of proposed driveway(s). For driveways in excess of 24 feet in width such as those proposed to serve this site the clear vision area is measured a 30 foot distance back from the driveway and 30 feet along the adjoining street right- of-way and then connecting these two points. The plan as proposed complies with these requirements at the intersection of each driveway within the parking lot. The applicant has proposed to plant new landscape materials within the clear vision area adjoining the proposed driveway onto SW 68th Avenue These new planting materials do not conflict with the clear vision requirements as shown on the proposed Landscape Plan. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106 requires a minimum of one off-street parking space for each 350 square feet. The applicant has proposed to develop 4,505 square feet of gross floor area and provide a total of 22 parking spaces which exceeds the minimum requirement of 13 spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA): Revised regulations became effective on January 26, 1992. A minimum of one disabled parking spaces are required if 1-25 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides one disabled parking space near the main entrance which complies with the minimum requirement. Due to its location adjoining the main building entrance walkway, handicapped persons would not be required to cross driveways to access the building. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106 requires one bicycle parking rack for each 15 required parking spaces in any commercial development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian pathways. The current site plan provides a bicycle rack located around the west side of the proposed office building. The proposed location complies with the minimum standard because it is within 50 feet of the main building entrances. Access: Section 18.108 requires that where up to 99 parking spaces are required, that one access point with a minimum width of 24 feet of paved width and 30 feet of total width be constructed. The preliminary site plan proposes to develop a driveway onto SW 68th Avenue. A total of 13 parking spaces are required to serve the proposed use. If the driveway provides for future shared access to the proposed development site to the west it is expected that this driveway would be sufficient to serve new development on adjoining properties where NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 8 such new development does not exceed 30,100 square feet of gross floor area of office space. The access which has been proposed is 24 feet in paved width and 34 feet in total width which complies with the minimum width requirements. The applicant has not applied for Site Development Review on areas shown to be an access easement on the proposed westerly development site. Because new regulations are in effect for all new development as it relates preservation of trees it is impossible to review through this application whether the proposed access easement is appropriately located as shown on the site plan given the existing trees on the future development site. It is recommended that no such access easement be recorded until such time as the adjoining property has gone through Site Development Review and a Certified Arborculturist has determined that the trees within this area are not viable for preservation and a replacement plan has been approved for Significant Trees in excess of 12 inches in diameter. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of all new structures to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in which pedestrians must cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum curbed vertical separation or a minimum three foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet where appropriate pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches,bicycle racks, and sign posts. The site plan as proposed provides a five foot wide sidewalk linkage to SW 68th Avenue which does not require pedestrians to cross the proposed parking lot. The building has also been designed to abut SW 68th Avenue which is served by TRI-MET's Beaverton- Lake Oswego 78 cross-town transit route. Signs: Section 18.114 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Commercial Professional Zoning District. All future proposed signage shall be reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporate functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by the franchised haulers. The site plan provides a trash and recycling enclosure. It is recommended that the applicant contact the franchised hauler and have the enclosure design reviewed and approved in terms of size and design to ensure ease of site servicing. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 9 Tree Removal: This application was when the previous regulations concerning tree removal were in affect. Under these requirements Section 18.150.020(E) required that a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground level. The applicant has proposed to remove a total 26 existing significant trees or groups of trees in excess of six inches in diameter as measured four feet above the existing grade elevations. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Section 18.150.030(A): 1. The trees are diseased,present a danger to property,or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; If preserved in place certain trees would interfere with the construction of necessary site improvements such as driveways, service areas and parking lot areas. Locating the proposed development on alternate portions of the site is difficult due to the limited site size and the dispersed nature of the existing significant trees on site. To preserve trees in substantial numbers would require that the site improvements be greatly reduced in size. 2. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; See statement above. 3. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; Due to the limited slope of the property no unusual erosion problems, slope instability or drainage problems are expected either on-site or off-site with the removal of these trees. The recommended conditions of approval included a requirement that the applicant demonstrate that off-site drainage will not adversely impact properties which are upstream and downstream of the subject property. 4. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; A tree protection plan shall be provided to ensure that removal of existing trees does not impact existing off-site trees. The tree protection plan shall be prepared by a consulting arborist. 5. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and. The applicant has not proposed to maintain any of the existing trees The applicant has provided approximately four times the minimum required number of parking lot trees as mitigation for the loss of trees. Due to the need to construct the structure, parking areas and driveways it is not possible to preserve the existing trees in substantial numbers. The site is not prominently located topographically and is not visible from large numbers of adjoining properties. 6. New vegetation planted by the applicant,if any,will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. Because of the limited area which will either be developed or preserved with the existing trees it does not appear feasible to plant replacement trees beyond the 19 total trees proposed as street and parking lot trees. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 10 Based on these findings removal of the trees shown within the existing conditions plan complies with the applicable criteria for tree removal. Minor Land Partition Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Minor Land Partition: 1. The proposal conforms with the city's comprehensive plan; 2. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; 3. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; 4. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title;and 5. All proposed improvements meet city and applicable agency standards(Ord.89-06; Ord.83-52). Both of the proposed parcels would be approximately .48 acres or 20,908 square feet complies with the minimum size requirements for properties within the Commercial Professional Zoning District. Each proposed lot also exceeds the 6,000 square foot lot minimum in accordance with Criteria #1. Chapter 18.92 is determined to be inapplicable because the site is zoned for residential use. Upon completion of the review period the applicants request will have complied with the statutory requirements of the City of Tigard for review of this application as required by Criteria #2. Adequate public facilities are available or have been required to be provided to serve this site as set forth in Sections 18.164.030 (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drain) as required by Criteria #3 as reviewed within the Engineering Department's comments contained elsewhere within this report. Through the building permit review the roof and site drainage for the new office building to be built on the site will be required to be directed to a public facility. Prior to development a hydrology and hydraulics analysis will be required to analyze impacts to upstream and downstream properties. The new parcels do not exceed a two and one half to one length to depth ratio. For this reason the proposed parcel configurations conform with size and dimensional requirements of the Commercial Professional Zoning District as required by Criteria #4. All proposed improvements will comply with City and applicable agency standards in satisfaction with Criteria #5 as reviewed through the building permit plan check NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 11 review process. The newly created parcels are not required to comply solar access requirements because they are zoned for commercial use. Section 18.162.050 contains the following provisions for lots created through the partition process: A. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. B. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. C. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. D. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. E. Front Yard Determination on flag lots: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. F. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. G. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. H. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. I. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. J. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria A, B, C, and D are satisfied. The parcels will exceed the area requirement of 6,000 square feet set forth within the Commercial Professional Zoning District. Each newly created parcel would have in excess of 15 feet of direct frontage on a NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 12 private street in satisfaction of the lot frontage requirement in Criteria C. Standards for setbacks, landscaping and clear vision requirements are reviewed elsewhere within this report in satisfaction of Criteria D. Criteria E and F are not applicable because the new lots are not flag lots in terms of access frontage to a publicly dedicated street. For this reason a land use buffer screen along the properties existing publicly dedicated street is not required. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards thereby satisfying Criteria G. Criteria H which requires reciprocal access maintenance agreement to maintain a joint access easement is not required because a flag lot parcel configuration has not been proposed. Criteria I is satisfied through the requirement for construction of a 24 foot minimum driveway width driveway from SW 68th Avenue. Criteria J has been met because the parcel is not located within the one hundred year flood plain or in areas with slopes exceeding 25 percent. This portion of SW 68th Avenue does not abut an existing bike and/or pedestrian path. Transportation Planning Rule: The portion of the Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8, 1994,that applies to this application is OAR 660-12-045(4)and(5). This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following measures: a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and, c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street. If it is not possible to orient an entrance facing the street the entrance shall be as close as possible to a transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and pedestrian amenities are required to display the main entrance and direct pedestrians to that entrance. The site has direct frontage on SW 68th Avenue which is a transit served street. The proposed office building has been located within four feet of the street to provide increased pedestrian accessibility. A direct pedestrian walkway connection has been proposed from the main building entrances to SW 68th Avenue. The walkway has been designed to encourage pedestrian use because the walkway does not require that pedestrians cross portions of the parking lot, the driveway or service areas to access the building from the street. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 13 SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON DECEMBER 26, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. December 26, 1995. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Division (639-4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 / 12/14/95 PR PARED BY: Mark Robe s DATE Associate Planner ex-coetfil 12/14/95 APPROVED BY: Richard B rsdorff DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 95-0021 -POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE PAGE 14 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/BOTH OFFICFLDING PAGE 1/5 2S110DB-90421 • 2S101AA-07800 • AMACHER, MARIE A ANDREWS, NELLIE B 15483 SW 114TH CT#42 12485 SW 67TH TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DB-91022 2S110DB-90982 ASHMORE,ALPHA MARIE BARNETT,ANGELA 15435 SW 114TH CT#102 15435 SW 114TH CT#98 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S101AD-02800 2S110DB-91062 BELAND,JOHN A/WANDA ANNE BOURLAND,JUANITA& 12301 SW MOFFITT DRIVE REIN, BILLIE LOUISE WILSONVILLE OR 97070 15373 SW 114TH CT #106 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-90971 2S101AD-01700 BOYLE, RICHARD 0&BEVERLY J CO- BRAINARD,LAVON(NOW SHORT) 2069 DILLOW DR 12630 SW 68TH WEST LINN OR 97062 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101AD-01600 2S101AD-01500 BROWN, RICHARD K BROWN, RICHARD K 7340 SW HUNZIKER#205 7340 SW HUNZIKER#205 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DB-90952 25101AD-02700 CARMICAL, FRED W&GLADYS L CARPENTER,RICHARD L& 15437 SW 114TH CT#95 POLLOCK,DONALD E/JULIA GAIL TIGARD OR 97224 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S110DB-91001 2S110DC-90271 CUMBEY, ROBERT E,TRUSTEE DAHL,STANLEY F&THELMA J 15435 SW 114TH CT#100 15525 SW 114TH CT#27 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-90901 2S110DC-90262 EATON, RICHARD A AND LAURA F GANGE,ADA W TRUSTEES 15565 SW 114TH CT#26 15437 SW 114TH CT#90 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-90891 2S110DC-90292 GANTENBEIN,ALICE R TRUSTEE GHOLSON,SAM S TRUSTEE 15437 SW 114TH CT#89 15525 SW 114TH CT#29 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDINo PAGE 2/ 5 • 2S110DC-90252 2S110DB-91041 ' HOWARD,CLARA M JOENS,GERTRUDE L 15565 SW 114TH CT#25 15373 SW 114TH CT#104 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-00500 2S110DB-91031 KASCH'S GARDEN&NURSERIES INC KEHM,RACHEL TRUSTEE 4000 SW INTERNATIONAL WAY#F103 15373 SW 114TH CT MILWAUKIE OR 97222 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-90991 2S110DB-00702 KESSLER, LORRAINE KIELHORN, IDA M ESTATE AND 15435 SW 114TH#99 RISTIG,DORETTE L AND TIGARD OR 97224 KRUEGER,HELEN I 9005 NW CORNELL RD PORTLAND OR 97229 2S110DB-00700 2S110DB-90371 KIELHORN, IDA M ESTATE AND KINCAID,JUANITA RISTIG,DORETTE L AND 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE KRUEGER, HELEN I PORTLAND OR 97225 9005 NW CORNELL RD PORTLAND OR 97229 2S101AA-09101 2S101AA-09600 KINDRICK,ALFRED F KINDRICK,ALFRED F AND DIANNE M DIANNE M 12560 SW 70TH AVE 12560 SW 70TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DB-90381 2S110DB-90941 LARSEN,CLAIRE LEVIN,DOREEN A 15485 SW 114TH CT#38 15437 SW 114TH CT#94 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DC-90342 2S101AD-00100 LINDSEY,CHARLOTTE F LOCKHART, PATRICK G&ROSEMARY 15525 SW 114TH#34 12725 SW 66TH AVE TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 2S110DC-90332 2S110DB-00400 LORENZ, EDWARD G TRUSTEE LUTON,ROBERT 15525 SW 114TH CT PO BOX 8041 UNIT 33 BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-00401 2S110DB-91102 LUTON, ROBERT LYNCH,MARY LOUISE PO BOX 8041 15371 SW 114TH CT#110 BLACK BUTTE RCH OR 97759 TIGARD OR 97224 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 3/ 5 41/0 2S110DB-90912 2S110DB-90362 ' MARENDISH,JOYCE M MCMULLEN,RICHARD D AND 15437 SW 114TH CT#91 GERTRUDE M,TRUSTEES TIGARD OR 97224 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-90442 2S110DC-90281 MESSINGER, EDWARD J AND ANN B MITCHELL,CHARLOTTE 15483 SW 114TH CT#44 15525 SW 114TH CT#28 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DB-00300 2S101AD-02600 NORTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE OF NORTHLAND HOMES INC THE EVANGELICAL COVENANT 1834 SW 58TH#202 CHURCH PORTLAND OR 97201 925 116TH AVE NE SUITE 221 BELLEVUE WA 98804 2S101AD-00800 2S101AA-09000 NORTHLAND HOMES INC NORTHLAND HOMES INC 1834 SW 58TH #202 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97201 2S101AD-01400 2S101AA-06700 OREGON KI SOCIETY OREGON STATE BAR 12700 SW 68TH AVE 1776 SW MADISON STREET TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97205 2S110DC-90231 2S101AA-08600 PALMER, EDWARD PEIRCE,STEPHEN W AND 15565 SW 114TH CT#23 LYNN L TIGARD OR 97224 12525 SW 68TH TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DC-90311 2S101AA-09100 POHL,ALICE N TRUSTEE POLLOCK, DONALD E 15525 SW 114TH CT#31 1834 SW 58TH STE 202 TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S101AA-08300 2S101AA-09001 POLLOCK, DONALD E& POLLOCK,DONALD E/JULIA GAIL CARPENTER, RICHARD L 1834 SW 58TH#202 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S101AA-08900 2S101AA-08500 POLLOCK, ELIZABETH G POLLOCK, MICHAEL E 1834 SW 58TH AVE#202 1834 SW 58TH AVE#202 PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 4/ 5 2S101AA-08700 IIIP 2S101AA-08800 0 POLLOCK. MICHAEL E POLLOCK,ROGER M 1834 SW 58TH AVE#202 1834 SW 58TH AVE#202 PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S101AA-09003 2S101AA-09004 POLLOCK, ROGER M POLLOCK,ROGER M 1834 SW 58TH AVE#202 1834 SW 58TH AVE#202 PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S1100C-90321 2S110DB-91081 REHDER,JEANNE N ROARK,CLYDE S/MARY 15525 SW 114TH CT 15371 SW 114TH CT#108 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-90411 2S110DB-00600 ROBINSON.SHIRLEY T TRUSTEE ROEMER, EUGENE MELVIN AND 15483 SW 114TH CT FAITH ANNETTE TIGARD OR 97224 15430 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DB-90432 2S101AA-07700 ROGERS,VIRGIL TRUST ROTH,JACOB T JR&THERESA A 15483 SW 114TH CT#43 12540 SW 68TH PKWY#6 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 2S110DB-90392 2S110DB-90931 SCHENK, SOPHIA M SCHICK,HAROLD R JR AND 15485 SW 114TH CT#39 THELMA G TIGARD OR 97224 15437 SW 114TH CT#93 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-91071 2S110DB-90351 SCHOUWEILER,ALLYN H &JOAN C SCHROEDER,MARJORY E TRUSTEE 15371 SW 114TH CT#107 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S110DB-91052 2S110DB-91012 SKYHAR,WILLIAM AND SPYKER,ELINA TRUSTEE GENEVIEVE R SZALOBRYT,JANE C TRUSTEE 15373 SW 114TH #105 15435 SW 114TH CT#101 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2511006-90402 2S110DB-00200 TILLINGHAST, RUTH P TRUSTEE TRIAD TIGARD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 15485 SW 114TH#40 320 ANDOVER PARK EAST STE 235 TIGARD OR 97224 SEATTLE WA 98188 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 5/ 5 2S110DC-90241 40 2S101AA-07100 . VETTERLEIN,CATHRYN J WARDIN,MARION E& 15565 SW 114TH CT#24 WARDIN, ILA J TIGARD OR 97223 PO BOX 53 NEWBERG OR 97132 2S110DB-90962 2S101AD-02400 WATKINS,JEAN A WESTERN EVANGELICAL SEMINARY 8064 SW WOODY END PO BOX 23939 DURHAM OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97281 2S101AA-07600 2S110DB-91092 WILHELM, MICHAEL W WILLOUGHBY,GEORGE F AND 12540 SW 68TH AVE SYLVIA R TIGARD OR 97223 15371 SW 114TH CT#109 TIGARD OR 97224 2S1100B-90922 2S110DC-90302 WILSON, PHYLLIS A ZIEGELMAYER,FRANCES M 15437 SW 114TH CT#92 15525 SW 114TH CT#30 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 J.T. FCB-1 12540 SN €81H AVENE TIGARD CR 97223 R E COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. DEC 2 (t 1;,..0. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice �y9 TT 8366 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 CITY OF TIGARD Legal Notice Advertising •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit •Accounts Payable-Terry • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 95-0021 MINOR LAND PARTITION fMLP)95-0013 >POLLOC BROTH OFFICE BUILDING The Director has approved, subject to conditions,a request for Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Parti- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION lion approval to combine all,or a ( )lots into STATE OF OREGON, for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block oft S W.68th COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, jss. Avenue, south of S.W. Franklin Street(WCTM 2S1 IAA, tax lots 8900, 9000,9001,9003 and 9004).ZONE:Commercial Professional(C-P).The I, Kathy Snyder C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-Tualatin T,imeE Code Chapters .120, 18. 50 and 1 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 18.116, 18.120, 18.150,and 18.164. and 193.020; published at Tigard _ aforesaid county and state; that the in the �� �- _ Site Develop. 95-0021/Pollock/Roth _ _ I �� :ERQSO , ,ter a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the OF entire issue of said newspaper for ONE ��� ST successive and . consecutive in the following issues: s. .,'II Ii •December 14 ,1995 •II in ■■■w■ „, OON P. ca Min A - - . .A%L .. • ■■■ r„, Subscribed and swoefore me this 1 ' th day of Decemb ( - 6 - I ■ii 44, ota blic for Oregon �/ I My Commission Expires: AFFID AVIT �i ! J i I I + X11 P , VARH& RI i hill” The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on :2/26/95. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accor- •ance with Section 18.32.290(A)and Section 18.32.370 of the Com- t.iunity Development Code,which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M., 12/26/95. TT8366-Publish December 14, 1995. ., _ II _ tILi1i H z III W HERMOSO w A 4 IN 2 F- S RA KIN ST CK :VELAND lila ____ IJPM 1. iv Lo u_i 'aril emit ry � GONZAGA L Mill I- - c z iii C II Z 1111 z illQ J CL i ) CK "V ti Q 46 Qi:••.,. 1 II CD 1111 ILL ---7 , 0 >— �IARI)Is s NW T H 0 VICINITY MAP A CASE: SDR 95-0021 NOTE: MAP IS NOT TO SCALE MLP 95-0013 N emmpvslayt DB12 JB5 , , IIMI II nommil 01. win IRE ,3I lin Notillil N. . jr-, c,„ . ,,..,a) entalINIM FRAN.. 1 liST Li ST anBEN/ELAND IS IT MIMI C CD rc4. 414 , _ a al 11 1111 ' GONZPGA ST 11111 a .. 121.(13 1 i I in ILE. D In a„,,,, ,L, ........ 0, III I o U vicinity Map p SDR 95-0021 .. . .scale,. .. Nd VICINITY MAP fist- – -------- - . * - _ 1 _L__— I 30' 30' 9 36 'in 10 35 i4 --- - - - - -- --- - -- - __ 100.02' 0 11 34 12 33 Q. •1 w ID 13 V 32 o 0 0 sn - -- - - -14 \-G -- - � 31 (5 lo co -- --. - - - — a; z 15 51.9 • 30 - W - �-- - — $9',� I Z Z D ,i0 16 29 100.03' Q z 17 c�`L� Q �3 28 Q.Q .^i - - -- - -- -- — I-co , 1 d, N. a)ai 27 0 Q IF (0 IPAR� #2 1, > � �l I a tC3 i U a 5 � I I I I I F- ai I i 30 30' r U. I 2�5 26 19 20 4'1 122 23 12 1 I 0 _ G 30.00 E 100.05' 29.92;111 ._ 29.98' ♦ 1 rr) PARTITION PLOT PLAN I CASE NO. SDR 95-0021 EXHIBIT MAP 1 MLP950013 M 4 . • _y S . _ ,ice/ y Ccrl� �Nla 7!� 1 71c°n0 l I ► ,, 1 t f mDcOn _ �. �� al ( x , . i, . ,, , c › .Drrnn I- __a_____1.... f cZi o I 1 K `' 1 on .. MEM N i - 1 (0 c0 n a w '-et"( 419Pr 'MaK (A4 PA/ i�p�al tk cncn NC ( . 0o Z WN O r •' • t r l�1' -.44,-,‘....' 1 ^4 1 S.W. 68TH AVENUE 1 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. • l t j dam ' �t 14-at/ po-y--e,tiol --7/hrAc CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION1 J4 'J " CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. ? OTHER CASE NO'S: Alvt4i4.dzi // '02F-q5 RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: ( &r ../1. GENERAL INFORMATION ,1 ) Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S.W. 68th Prkwy between (A) Application form (1) SW Hampton and SW Franklin r J f (B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. WC1 2S1 n1AD twY lot 9001 authorization .4°7-5 ..23 -'2' 1 [ ____(C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 18,000 (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*Elizabeth/Donald Pollock (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) \ ADDRESS 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 PHONE (F) Applicant's statement CITY Portland, Or. ZIP 97221 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* J.T. Roth, Jr. (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 12540 SW 68th Prkwy #B PHONE 639-2639 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Tigard, Or. ZIP 97223 (H) Filing fee ($ ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow construction of single commercial building approx. 4500 sf along with on-site Approval Date: improvements of narking lot. landscapina. Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 leo AIWA CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW }call, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION (i - / �2 Application elements submitted : PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S.W. 68th/69th hPtween S W. (A) Application form (1) Hampton and S.W. Franklin I I (B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2S10�AA 08900 lots 17,18 authorization and 2S101AA 09000 lots 19-2�2 11 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 18,000 (D) Assessor' s map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Roth, J.T. Jr. and Theresa (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) \ ADDRESS 12540 SW 68th Prkwy #B PHONE 639-2639 (F) Applicant' s statement CITY Tigard, Or. 97223 ZIP 97223 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* J.T. Roth, Jr. (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 12540 SW 68th Prkwy #B PHONE 639-2639 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Tigard, Or. ZIP 97223 (H) Filing fee ($ ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. -_ COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N .P.O. Number: allow assignment of tax lot 8900 to tax lot 9000 to create a single tax lot (9000) Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 I8 o L, I 30' 30' N 1;39'56'54" E 100.01' -• o 9 0 in o ,� _ __ rn o o a z 35 0 ° 10 ° o 1 f k 1 ^ U) N 89'57'04" E 100.02' i� °° v al N E• o •o° 11 34 0 0 0 Ln v z 12 3.3 Fi - m 13 nq -- 32 0° `o �.On G - --- --- — v I c 14 ?),\ 31 0956 o co(x)C. \v--) 15 ��`-o cCx�a 30 W O 0o d• FF. 16 29 Z . Z z o S 89'57'16" W 100.03' Q 6 17 0,'\ (100.00'(1)) �5 `,„18 0o _ o - a; 27 O - 1 1 : to � `I. PARCEL' #2 �\ o PkRCEL #1 I o • yb' I I vi I F�� I W ;r, 30' 30 N I I N " I I I FD 5/8 IR FD 5 '8" IR 1 I I W/YELLOW PLASTIC WPELLOW PLASTIC `• 19 20 21 22 0 23 24 25 26 1 CAP SCRIBED CAP SCRIBED -1 I - l A o _ �- I -- I "COOPER CONSULTANTS COOPER CONSULTANTS _l___ N 00.02'22' W 200.10' N 00.02'22' W (200.00'0)) 30.00' r 0.04' S.N. 21695 I O - S.N.1 21695 S.W. r 100.05' (too.00(1)) : _ J ---- 29.92' ' 3� --- S 89.57'37" W (260.00'(1)) 260.10' — 29.98'1 b VACATED AS PER ^. to STI o FEE NO. 86-44443 o --- -- - - - - o iri n o ci L ,�k96� iii 1• -- - in i-i- :,, 8" IR o Si.1;)11UUEN T BOX `" M CO in S.N. 15846 1 �� N 89'58'49" E 1 1 _ _ _._.. (260100'(1)) 160.LO' Ni S.W. HAMPTON STREET 1 1 , , - HFI I) From: FINANCE/MICHAELA Subject: Re: Lot Consolidation To: MARK_R Originally to: FINANCE/MARK_R, Date sent: 1 Nov 95 13:56:30 The County Surveyors office indicated that under ORS 271 .080, a "portion" of a plat could be vacated and thereby eliminate the lot lines. I would suggest that if we do a vacation, approved by CC in normal procedure, that we require a record of survey, similar to a LLA map, and the survey would show the recording data of the ordinance vacating the lot lines. As an alternative, they could file a MLP but the County pointed out this is more expensive, an $590 filing fee for an MLP, plus a title report and a final plat by the surveyor, as compared to $100 for a LLA record of survey. So, you have choice and so do they. Mucho thanks. > From: "Mark Roberts" <FINANCE/MARK_R> > To: MichaelA > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 14:35:15 +0000 > Subject: Lot Consolidation > Any word from the County on how we need to process the JT Roth > MLP application? , co t) / olio i '' 1. V t ,, dt - b17.■. .1 e.)... t_ 30' •30' • " N 895654" E 100.01' - os ' I. b -.. 9 P 36 .-.. 'in 0 - _ b 1.,1.3 z b p 10 35 0 :-- Z k "Ls' P.IINI .-- in o --• I_J - •—• oi ---.. N 6957'04- E 100.02 /- °° s_.., 5 1 c., 0 -0 11 34 ci in I — o . in ______ , 0 ,--- 33 z 12 .-.. _ - a :-.- in Lu o It) m 13 V 32 0. 0; .-... 1)3 0 -- — — ——— l Oi 0 I V) 1 14 ca\.6--- 31 e c;0 'in'Lel co csi o- 0, - (--) to o 15 19 <IP 0-N' 30 LLI D 1\. b scr- _ Z , 1 P -r, . - —k° ..-4 0 .. - ciS r16 29 l 14 fli 0 o a; 0) S 8957'16" W 100.03' - Z z i2 Iii (100.00•0)) a < 0 in 17 9.-\ i 28 a /' F b Tzt-- <C _ N.,,). _ -.4. - - co P 18 a; 27 00 0 F _ / N _ _ _ _ z CD ° I I r 1 1 --- a) CD I —_ I b IPARCEA Iit #2 1., -8 al CEL @l I ° 6 vi II • 4cp? ci co I I l co — In v) i I 30' cv .- FD 5/8" IR 1 -52 I I I , W/YELLOW PLASTIC W/11.1.1010, ‘-.LASTIC 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / CAP SCRIBED OAP CCRIBED \ 1 o I ° I 1 _t COOPER • - CONSULTAN C:)01-.ER CONSULTANTS - - 200.10' U) (200.000,) N 0002'22' W 30.00.T.f 0.04' N 00'02'22' N b I S.N. 21695 r ) .,-"• TT.. ■ S.N. 21695 / , ‘- 100.05' (loo.00(i)) -1k (-- w --) - 29 'i S 8957'37" W (260.ar(i)) 260.10' .98 iD S — tr) VACATED AS PEN —, ..-. b FEE NO. 86-44443 - :..--- 0 c• -- -- - — - ci o i'F) - c3:5 ci - l )01'- a- NA.. •\.. i. coV 0- i.- q N\A• io Lo Ji- cri tql t) 0 4 b 0 /OMEN[ BOX__•,‘ / rc) k / S.N. 13846 ), -— _ _ N tit-J*58'49" E (260.00.(1)) 260.20' -....• • -0 PO S.W. HAMPTON STREET I , . , Nov. 01, 1995 City of Tigard City Counsel 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn.: Mr. Mark Roberts RE: Gonzaga Street Vacation WCTM 2S1 O 1 AD tax lots 9001, 9004, 9000 Dear Mr. Roberts: I have recently submitted application for the development of property located along 68th Ave. in Tigard. This property includes a portion along its' southerly property line of vacated Gonzaga Street. Through research of title it has been discovered that, although the City issued ordinance makes no reference to any easements within the vacated land, the legal description attached to the same ordinance contains the clause "Save and except an easement for utility purposes over the entire parcel to be vacated". (see attached) Now then, there does not appear to exist any utilities within this vacated parcel nor is there a need to install any utilities in same parcel with the development of the property. In addition, the total portion of vacated Gonzaga impacts three separate property owner's having similar repercussions to each. As the recorded vacation ordinance states, no permanent structures can presently be constructed over this easement even though the easement services no utilities. All of the tax lots abutting the northerly line of Gonzaga are presently owned by Mr. Don Pollock, I am however purchasing tax lot 9000 on contract. It is our desire to make application to remove the condition of the existing utility easement and with this letter we are requesting your assistance. Your guidance through this issue is greatly appreciated. Sincer; y; Gi/ • •oth, Jr. c-r21,11// Donald E. Pollock WES RECEIVED PLANNING NOV 141995 \\ l:S l'F.RN FV';ANG1:1.lc. ;AI_ SI:MIN;AR\ November 13, 1995 City of Tigard City Council 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ATTENTION: Mr. Mark Roberts Re: Gonzaga Street Vacation WCTM2S1 O1AD Tax Lots 9001, 9004, 9000 Dear Mr. Roberts: Western Evangelical Seminary owns the property immediately south of the above described tax lots, as more specifically described on the attached Exhibit A. The Seminary joins with J. T. Roth,Jr., in requesting that the existing utility easements in the former Gonzaga Street be vacated. Very truly yours, WESTERN EVANGELICAL SEMINARY David .Jeffe it"?'e P ident DFJ/slh Enclosure cc: Don G. Carter J. T. Roth,Jr. P.O.BOX 23939•Portland,Oregon 97281•503-639-0559•Fax 503-598-4338 • EXHIBIT A The land is located in the county of Washington, state of Oregon, and is described as follows: Lots 1, 2 , 3 , 4 , 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 , 13 , 14 , 15, 16 , 17, 18, 19 , 20, 21, 22 , 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27 , 28 , 29 , 30, 31, 32, 33 , 34 , 35 and 36, Block 32 , WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington, and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH that portion of SW Gonzaga Street vacated by Ordinance No. 86-33 which . inured thereto. EXHIBIT A - }— — — - .tip!• . 1 . it 11 4',• o _......_.-.�\ A� .r o_ ! t• GC4443 ! 4 1 . ,/1( CITY OF TIGAR[, OREGON y •i / ORDINANCE NO 86-3 3_ 4 , .j. 1 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION or fw GON7AGA Gila:ET BETWEEN GOTII AND 691H AVENUI_G AND DECLARING AN EEEECTIVE DATE. �e lt WHEREAS, thu Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to 14 Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and .' WIIGRC.AZ, the rests_+n and purpone for thin vacation is to return the `` right—of—way area to the adjacent property owners to facilitate development of ; ttaa parcels; and WHEREAS, the vacation i , recommended by the Planning Commission and the City Engineer; and (- WHEREAS, in accordance with ORS 771.100, and INC Section IC.On.110, the • Council fixed a time rand place for the public hearing and the Recorder i published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and , r ' WilliREAS, notice l.as been mailed to all property owner, abutting said vacation area and all owners in the affected area, ar, described in ORS 271.000; and . ,+ WHEREAS, the Council, having hold a hearing uo June 23, 19(16, finds the public ,T': interest will not be prejudiced by Lire vacation as provided by ORS 771 .120 and `t>;a. • TMC Section 15.011.1:10; and r '; W111:HCAS, the Council finds that il. i:e in the public int.•wesl. tc• approve• the I request to vacate the right—of—way area because the public interest will not ;z be prejudiced; and -i.t Wllt"RL:As, the Council finds thaat the following condition is necessary to vacate said land: �'! the vae.atirn shat! nel. be effective until the effective dale of this K ' ordinance and it shall nut. be effective mail .a a er•t.i f it'd copy of ?:�� this ordinance has been recorded with Ir.e Washington County Clerk, ti 'i? As ..s eon, cane! :�eerveey.,r IIII 1.1 IY of 11GAR11 Ola1r111L: An rot I Otv_.: C ji It Section_t: l he 1 ietor;: I:i 1 y r:+unr i 1 he•r'e by order,•• Cho vacation iun of that p r:-•t i:,re of ninth!• of way area known .eta °.41 Grn:.aga !Aren't between 60th and With Avenue % rt ' ' .15 .lnncrlbrrl nn Lies. attached I rltibit "A" and •ehuwn on the attae•he.I I'thihil tk 4 •- "0", and by Ibis reference evade parts hereof. i 4, nu.gion 7• the 1 i•par•d City Council fur•tt.e, orders Lle,at the vacation he is cubjec5, to t.hr• following eoradl;.ian: P ri R )t1 t1 ' le , M t 1w/1106A , R ri -,:...4144 / tt. ''C tr: (231 a -'{x'41, _:1 - - a. "¢ ::x ..:;�Y� .�: . .• - - . r. p il K W •. • Cn ■, „v a I The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this 1+, ordinance and it shall not be effective until a certified copy of .ftt`'. i, this ordinac.cc has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk. •,h; . „v ,7 Assessor, and Surveyor. "1,?4" C • '"'''" Section 3: In no situation shall this ordinance be effective until the 31st • i.�.;a t 0:1•.,i day attar its anactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. s'r'x'" ,�.,� vote of all Council members present after 1,,;; o►4:". PASSED: Dy { to :+•�": `ts being read by number and title only, this ot.3r'/, day «. 19116. . ;:) q +^.: ''' i-ryr,rwrnitrNi rte+;-XMn?L:r Recorder �▪ V. APPROVED: This c].1{4— day of _7gt:�""`, 19(16. I▪' 'V . -fit John E. Cook, Mayor 1 ; ti4,„r,., , STATE Of OREGON ) °' l�` County of Washington ) 't•t``t.:••,`�Ly ' �- '1 City of Tigard ) S,:a4�ia. r..i'il.-'':,«• qualified and ;, r.,.V:„t% I. LOREEN WILSON, NEREDY CERTIFY THAT I am the duly appointed, ;3;.?A",�• Acting Recorder of Chu City or Tigard, Oregon. ir:--." I .furt�ter egrtlfy that I have compared the Lhe herewith copy of OROINANC_ JI %'+st NO "” , _j bf• the City of Tigard with the original in my possession as �;;;g � f ,_t��;;., cu5tcdir+n o1'. the official records of the City of Tigard, and the the herewith "_` �Wi ! ' 'copy 1? '� corrnct.tr.nscriPt of the whai.: of ORDTNhiJCE NO. , i'.F my hand and the seal of the City of �, Wit(k' Oi 1 have hereunto t• .. i•'t+Tard f:h t�s ���/'r day of .4,0.r.-;.r4..�I..-•--- FNIf :64i • , 4 Actin') City Recorder ~x-••, tR' (4009A) F I' w1 ORATNANCC NO. 11:+••_•! �__ . iv '�`i ►�r.,Mtc Plop 7 )W-170 1 %Ilk: 01 44 i I I. •` o __:1. .. N • V' LLI, 1 EXHIBIT "A" {Y ::4 +, LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1..i FOR •..�+: 3 ; i VACATION OF A PORTION OF 1 . t °r^,r� S.W. GONZAGA STREET ,..,, CITY OF TIGARD 'ter• . ,r :`A: . A parcel of land in the plat of WEST PORTLAND HIEIGHITS, Washington County, { :N!"-:Z1,!� : Oregon; the said parcel being all of S.W. Gonzaga Street (Seventh Street) t e ;r%; . an+l S.W. 6th Avenue !Grant :, rPf" + - between S.W. 611th Avenue (Washington Street) i �:��js' d 1 �•' i Street) , in said plat described as follows: 9 ,� Beginning at the Northwest corner of Block 32; thence, North 02° 33' 06" East*, a distance of 60.00 feet, to the Southwest corner of Block 29; `�,;�, •� �' thence. South Ill° 28' 47" East, a distance of 199.97 feet to the Southeast corner of Block '39; thence, South 02C 33' 17" West, a distance of 60.00 ` a-V1t . feet, to the Northeast corner of Block 32, thence, North 87° 28' 47" West, r,! v : F a distance of 1'19.97 feet to the point of beginning. The parcel of land to . .. t, he vacated being approximately 0.275 acres. ; v:1;w A a• • r.3 N.y J t,•r. t .��,�> Save and except an cas^matt for uti 1�ty purposes over tits rnti re. payee to 1.wY`y • he vacated. d .• kr�±�'r• REGISTERED 1,'.'�"� PROFZSziIONA'. i { # LAND. SU(;V6Y,QR ;• 44141; KEITI I C . TI+GM6'SO N R :1 h 4a. c : h; 'llrarit+o arr „acrd on County :,ur•vt'y No. :--'(ln!4. ,• y 3 ('� .s . f2',Y, �1 ' IJ } �*± ~• 4 '.�" Mme. .. 1 y..1.-. -.24'..^:72.••_-_.:........,„z, _ < r .. i. j • . . - r ,>, ` L! qt Al ' i V) , =4X--• f I I. C I S.W. ELMHURST co ` fry f tJ — .1 1 } ti Ni I „ ___.1 Q i � r i I i :1 Y t fix:,, in • a ' • 3 4,ry I I i:.~ FRANKLIN ST i ,_ i i ,y .:.'t•'.: ; 11 1 I .: I. • . . 1. • 1: . I i .. ._ _ O., a A fA 1 W c. {: t 1 rerVELAND RD. ■ I ■ i .,- — t a _ r ;l' 1 .�.' T I S.W. //`� �3 ` ST. -4 'L_' L .. `* 1 I 2'711:: -.s;.• \-._i• GONZAGA ST. ri 1 I, . i . 1 • 1 I ; Il 1 �'? L S.W. HAMPTON .T. .r.1" •• I I , :.•ti: STATE OF OREGON } R^O el J e 1 ` SS I I ' ,''i` �', '4 Cuunfy of Washington ` I 1 .•i: VQ.�rti�{'!C 11 i1 I,Donald W.Mason.Duoctni of As.OSSnurnl I I 1 3 211 And Taxation and F.•OfficIo flcc'ninr of Con• a YL>� I f xoynncns for amid county,d0 h by Cnri11V flint I • -1 _„.— (ha *rlhm ntstrumnnl Of writing was rnc.aycd ��= ,... . .1.. .•..�wa+ - - y �` +'f a^_” and rOrdoo in took of racartts Of said county. 1 +4C.+ Don.;Ir. W. Mason, 17rrccn)r nl �: .:i•. • Asaostlmrinl ;••tt inx^rinn. Ex.• .S Cbmc•u Cr„n.ly CInrk H �;"` 1986 SEP 30 fM 1: 32 s,,�, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON " hog Leal CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S.W. 68f11,/tigt h hptwpen S W. (A) Application form (1) Hampton and S.W. Franklin I I (B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2S101AA 08900 lots 17,18 authorization and 2S101AA 09000 lots 19-12 I (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 18,000 (D) Assessor's map (1) \PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Roth, J.T. Jr. and__Theresa (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS 12540 SW 68th Prkwy #B PHONE 639-2639 (F) Applicant's statement CITY Tigard, Or. 97223 ZIP 97223 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* J.T. Roth, Jr. (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 12540 SW 68th Prkwy #B PHONE 639-2639 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Tigard, Or. ZIP 97223 (H) Filing fee ($ ) *When the owner and •the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow assignment of tax lot 8900 to tax lot 9000 to create a single tax lot (9000) Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P • Rev'd 5/87 List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: N/A • 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of /16_ 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. A" • • .L1\ 7"I Theresa A. Roth (KSL:pm/0524P) * F I R S T A M E I C A N T I T L E C O M P A N Y * Washington County ******************************************************************************** * * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * * * Reference Parcel #: 2S101AA 08900 * * Parcel Number :R0456839 * * Owner :ROTH J T JR & THERESA * * CoOwner • * Site Address : *NO SITE ADDRESS* * * Mail Address : 12540 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 * * Telephone • * * * * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * * * * * Transferred: 09/28/95 Loan Amount: $111, 150 * * Document # : 69654 MULTI-PARCEL Lender : SELLER * * Sale Price : $117 , 000 Loan Type : SELLER * * Deed Type :WARRANTY * * * * * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * * * * * Land : $28 , 390 Exempt Amount: * * Structure: Exempt Type * * Other Levy Code : 02381 * * Total : $28 , 390 94-95 Taxes : $444 . 02 * * %Improved: * * * * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * * * * * Map Grid: * * Census :Tract Block * * MillRate: 15. 6392 * * Sub/Plat:WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS * * Land Use: 2002 VACANT, COMMERCIAL * * Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, * * :LOT 17 , 18 , 23 , 27 , PLUS PT VACATED * * : ST, ACRES . 25 * * * * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * * * * * Bedrooms Lot Acres : . 25 Year Built: * * Lot SqFt : 10, 890 Bldg SqFt : * ******************************************************************************** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * F I R S T A M E .< I C A N T I T L E C O M P A N Y * Washington County ******************************************************************************** * * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * * * Reference Parcel #: 2S101AA 09000 * * Parcel Number :R0456848 * * Owner :ROTH J T JR & THERESA * * CoOwner * * Site Address : 12570 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD 97223 * * Mail Address : 12540 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 * * Telephone * * * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * * * * * Transferred: 09/28/95 Loan Amount: $111, 150 * * Document # : 69654 MULTI-PARCEL Lender :SELLER * * Sale Price : $117, 000 Loan Type : SELLER * * Deed Type :WARRANTY * * * * * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * * * * * Land : $54 , 880 Exempt Amount: * * Structure: $17 , 820 Exempt Type * * Other Levy Code : 02381 * * Total : $72 , 700 94-95 Taxes : $1, 136. 98 * * %Improved: 25 * * * * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * * * * * Map Grid: 655 G4 * * Census :Tract 307 . 00 Block 2 * * MillRate: 15. 6392 * * Sub/Plat:WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS * * Land Use:2012 COM, IMPROVED * * Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, * * :LOT 19-22 , PLUS PT VACATED ST, * * :ACRES . 30 * * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * * * * * Bedrooms Lot Acres : . 30 Year Built: * * Lot SqFt : 13 , 068 Bldg SqFt : * ******************************************************************************** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. y -1 •1 v4y y s Yt t'.+ o +a.4�6 tt�•ts.„�s 1 S .,w*..: A*""e..•+4 `g t'• .^- ,' • '''•.b.re `Lnt�r-,�,y, .2.�rr 1 .. :'1 4,.,. -T ! '';',",,T., ,">4 h �t,,,�;14`i i �1,,t, '•, Z�7.�., .rt U' . .• vite,c1it o:L, ,_ '.�Cew .•7. .Ni...... � ¢'r' a a, 't !7{`,.S1 i Tzt K t.. _ �-,,,,-,„,,,,,,z,).....4,,4" fir'' ; .' t M;;`i .a ma.,_Y,. 4 , Z.q`14F,w}l�7t 5, er.,r_•w ,• 't �•1.:. to } �i \ ..• h �, /) .) •,..!‘'' • Ce? .4. //ct ks.„1C+i -ii --44(PN:. ...‘ 4 .."‘. •r . S'ATU OP WARRANTY DEED i7-"S,:Sxr ,, \ 4 rf' t-: i '�" ` if. 1 SAL'L`l mp_g A -L9.ts.�LEF..d�„.J90,LtAm R_.,..gsams.Latup_mag .,p,, .• J .• r. . ., Oreoi3r, r r ```.; k, eonsnyc;id warrants to LL ,,._r,, >tad1 are9.gitiC USSt±ag _ r e h.',.k rt• c r r.:-Ur,.. 1'ti•. r ariAift3, ( yea.: t~ ci, the olio• leg described real property tree of lions end eaee:mb:anrt,�eept AB epcei5cafiy act forth I~sreie: ;;,;;�`. `4. i "'.th''�*': Lot 17 St 18, Block 29, Hoot Portland Heights, in tho City of Tigard, County of '.1.1;%41$ •b..; • 'w Waahin, ton and Stete of Oregon. Lot 19, 20, 21 & 22, Block 29 West Portland ;w ,z Height , in the City of Tigard, County of Voahington rnd State of Oregon. lei?lie x.' Toaoth• r with that portion of vacated S.W. Gonzaga Street as vacated by document tit k r-14, Y!,cz 't rocord d September 30, 1936 in he 86044443. Subject to 1995-96 twos a lien ' '.` �. _` due bar not yet payable Statutory potters and aoaessmcnt of Unified Sewerage 1+. '* Agency P,2aorveticn of utilities recorded Sept. 30, 1986 fee 86044443. -' r�{, w , „,,c. , 1 `1 '• �- '- This r to free of Bens and cecuthbrance EXCEPT: �+:t 5' ; '=” ;J- in}�? . 5ia y. s;:ft.4,4,?,.:;.:.: 'i THIS I; ;TRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE.PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS LMSTRUMENT DI c9i `+ ;+ *�' a rt VIOLA: 'ON OF APPLIC Y3LE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING "y�" Dyey F`i? ,;. k"; , THIS i` >TRUhLE vT,THE FERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH ,�• . s .•,y"�. n x ' THE AL 'ROPPIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERLFY APPROVED USES AND TO �e••. a fit rd4 yxxyry�4•V, ^ (�1 DETER itri-E ANY UMTI;C ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OP.FOREST PRACTICES AS DENIED IN ''r:�-. '` ilir, ..`z,, Ni ORS 30.' ?0. .i'.; Y � ;: "4 -1,-,.,- Q Mere u it•,.t`vr .,•'. `` 1s�, . i n The true -cosidcration for this conveyance is S�1]000.09 m mm its of ORS 93.0!0) { g t i : �• � Dated"- : 19 day of Sept-n',- 19_15_,„. t' t 1 1 L + - _, �•` "`"yr c'"f��'` DOHAL r P. POLLL(OCF "� EL • G POLL CK y L s. ; �W(:; . '* STATE )F OREGON 1 � t�. ',..s.14 County, r LTx0MAI{ }:s. rr X b t!';:".::::.Z., aiSa ate` 70., BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this 19 day of Seyeeehgt ,19.°x_,before me,the t.‘ P ,,t ` s` r ,e� . undtrsit- e4 a Notary Public in mid for said Cart.uti•and State.personally appeared the within named ti • t;:x'-r r,, -MAL 1 E. EOLLAGY„_.P.ND ELI.ZREF X -C. POLLOCK t_� ``.. ti F � ., , ,-,...lt r,,=6 ,q` ti" known t the to be the identical individual descnhcd in and who treaded the'Pid;in instrument and acknowledged to ., '*y ± f v fit- t 1 , `f' me that ._H.E executed the same freely end vclunfa-art. A, ' ,� y. K IN I.STIAfOA'Y illIEREOr I have hen-unto set my hard and off red my official seal the dap and year last above t 4 1 t ax written. ti • . Notary bl frOregoa i... a /� 21‘y Commission expires - k ti� 4 � � j t.^: • NA, t• 'f~`` r h , ; `r .� . . r - • i Y,M tih t ,t h -- Title Or cc No. 777924 •, x ,r •. THIS SPACE �FSL lE FOR RECORDER'S USE Escw o. k , K ,Sa �1� } ,4 Escrow •!" -.t7Y ir mei rem ling ro:umto: r''•'`�.�'.1 ••:`_I:1`I3T011 COUNTY r g,3'r ,: J. T. tprh Jr. :'+t::1! \• r ti 1•.. Trr TrAM.:fctr TAX t•+� ° ^L } l if1 �BCh �. (: �n• �'t /!�tr _ 7 �"9`✓ gty '} Lars' r ! a r, OR 97223 �, ` ', .. y1t \ karma,Aadrott,Z0 i Fa RAID DATE 0119 • }4-' t Until a d'.r It requettet alh tear eta,mane than be sent +yr I' +4�. t '''''.;•e•; tti 11Hfof wingQaddrote. a, ,.• <v; '-,;:rr 12.5A1.IV 6 B tit j r a t} . 4V=+ C4F .-4 �.vers 4R_ 97.222 >` t'r . ,` s v1. m.,,,,,Adaretn,710 ; ,t..-t• .• >,; t - e9 -{ 28 28 17 28 r 27 l 8 + 27 18 T 2T -r - T T T 4500 1 4300 I .17 AC. AC. a 23 24 25 26 19 20121 22 23 24 25 26 19 20121 22 23 24 25 26 1 Flog r FRANKLIN 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 / r Tgoo 8300 8200 .13 AC. . 30 Ac.I I , 52Ac. .29 AC. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 I 41 1 5 6 7 8 01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I I 1 I 1 1 ' 1 + 1 1 1 .�- _L i 36 36 1 : 7700 7800 .1 .34 AC. .75 AC. I + 35 - -1 3 5 W I I I 34 t T I I 8500 W I H 34 .l2 AC. a I 12 33 i 33 12 1 13 g 32 + 32 8700 8600 3+0 .12 AC. 2 9 .23 AC. -1 7600 31 31 .34 AC. H + 30 8800 30 30 t .12 AC. 2g 16 29 _ 28 s 50 1 8900 N .o60Ac. 28 17 + ,2y4c. 27 18 27 7 + T T T 9001 I . 000 h ./5Ac. 19 20 21 221 23 24 25 26 19.3 9 20 21 22 23 25 26 '1 2 23 24 25 26 l.��^'• 1 cr O v, 25'.±.251.25'254.25:1.25_125'_25 25' 125'1.25s-125'1-25' t p' 25�124 125'l25' 2t5� � 25 125 �' o (S.W. GONZAGA 5T. ) vAC • TED VACATED oo- 4 s4 VACATED 95-101917 87- X0900 _ — -- — SEE MAP — — 2S I lAD i (■j: L741-\I\ �....ay_,..0•.NS 1.n )n Agyi,L..KtNC+ rJ7*,•A.-444.1+T '2kAtara. e....14,0.•�1U UL1 08.'17/1995 15:42 5036849189 CASHS RLTY PA3E 02 "- J UJL ULJY r. 1 � i 4/ ir e ri • . Alt. .'.-7/ i/f c ,a, ;lk CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 0/r)ko/ LQ,cy� "9". 411411I-.i. J CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO lox 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97323 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAPP USE ONLY CASE HO. -14D/° 9‘,-(5717--------- I OTHER CASE NO'S: ,4P!s",461l RECEIPT NO. - 5- 2 ' j`-> APPLICATION CEPTE BY: __11/12f DATE: 5 2 7 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicstioa elem nts submitted ; PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION S.W. 68th Prkwy between SW Hampton and SW Franklin Application form (1) �,-(8) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. FAY lat onni authorization 1 I L (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 18,000 - -1:-/- (D saessor'a map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*ElizabetVDonald Pollock ( 'plot pled (pre-app checklist) )IDDUSS 1634 SW 58th Ave # 202 PHONE � (P) Applicant's statement ^ CITY Portland, Or. ZIP 91221 _ (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* J.T. Roth, Jr. /1 #(G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 12540 Sr, 5$t1.1 Prjcwv #B PHONE 639-21512 addresees within 250 feet (1) CITY Tigard, Oz. _ ZIP 97223 (H) Filing tee (S ) *When the owner and the applicant are different 4,%--(I) Construction Cost Estimat People, the applicant must be the purchaser of record I 'ad 6,A timid e' -‘ 1i4�i�£/.'./; /I) or a leases in possession with written authorization DATE DET RMIN TO Bt tOHPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written / C' -3C ' 'IS authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the apace provided at1 page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN,/Z NE DESIGNATION: Vt' ( 2. PROPOSAL SARY �(.7. 4- e owners ocord of the subject property Cam- _ • request site development review approval to f SV- 41Icu building approx. 4500 sf along with on-site Approval Date: 1momyerrrn _.e of Jar a to" - 1anc1ttir i1a T ik4e, _____________ ______ r Final App oval Date: planning Engineering — )524P/13P tev'd 3/87 CASHS RLTY PAGE 01 19 49-17 14I Ni 68 P.02/02 • I 1 ma' 5?4c. s- 3700 -I I- 610.124c 9 + . /. •AC. I O . 1 - -- — I I 34 - -: -- - 12 4 33 2 6401 . _ I- .?s.1e.iii t 4. • 14 2'3 32 - ' -, a 2+4 -I ; ; f-6400 1 S ■ 30 ., i : I- tP44C + 16 29 ' ' 16 Z3 1 1 17 26 -1 17 -•.- 27 1e 27 16 27 1$ T T T -" 1 I r • , 1— 1 1 , T T -r r "1 I- T 7 Y + T 4300 4500 1 Z3 • 25 26 19 20121 22 23 ,17 4 25 26 19 20121 22 23 ?4 ?5 26 15 20 21 22 23 2 P 10 R r L. '{f/> >�`l D ...1 __1__1._ 4 • .1_I 1 L . I 1 1 i ,) 1 . t ` 1 A j 1 t FRANKLIN STRI 8300 oaf a 200 ,�9100- - - - 71100 1 6700 .44 4 e. II* .89 14 .13 AC. lot I I 1.s!Ac. 3 6 7 11 1 1 Z 3 4 oR 6 7 5 1 1 2 3 4 3 6 17 6 1 11 2 3 4 5 ■ I I I 1 C3, 20,533 36 _ t ' r 30 , 7700 ... 7000 1 I. + 35 N 35 .JI AC. .T5 AC. 10 .. 1 N. -1 34 w I I �. 11 •600 V I I I + 34 -r -1 r 33 Ir 12 * .IAAC. _ • 1t 33 h 12 + «: 13 2g 32 ' F 13 2 7 Q 32 - K AC. 2`9 .0 AC r 31 14 + 31 A 7900 V. .4 IS + .. .dI AC, 3U . ._ . _ - - r 30 ' 0800 ,� - Ll� 1- M MAC. 19 ld a F _ � _ 7100 �e 6900 >Q 17 — 28 -4 . 1- 1.00As. i M .t3AC 18 27 4 T 9 -T T. .1 - ----mot • r I I 9001 I 1000 K ./SAC I. 1 • ZI 22I 1 2 24 25 28 19 20 f!I 22 23 4 25 19 20 21 22;23 24 25 n'fr�rAI:r 1 �`I tfi �. Vol) t•' s/la+ul.et:.itt1354 0 Kt Lie lam.lttr 1"J4'u�- 1ta'lttiu.4 W. �a'1tt'yat'�t+' �� M'� ..., t� .! '..i. � R vv++ 4S.W 6vNYA0A $T.! _VC Anal �. " It ',�, -- — t4-tuft ' vacant r - T441.45_ 1 AD I 08/17. 1995 15:42 5036849189 0431-15 R'_TY SAGE 03 rAA nV 7U3 Q7[ Ut.” r I. List any variance, conditional use, Sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this applications Mix i. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application, S. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that my be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. " S. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. Lc_ DATED this . 622-,L) ? day of (7": ,,c 4 y 19 ;ICNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the Subject property. AMR' / � L Dona d E. Poliocfy,�, Ju a Gail Pollock :KSL:pm/0524P) 08/17/1995 15:42 5036849189 CASHS RLTY PAGE 04 August 11, 1995 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 RE. Site Development Review Application Lots 9001,9003,9004 West Port. Heights This letter is to certify that we(the owner's of the above mentioned property) acknowledge and approve the Site Development Review Application being proposed by J.T. Roth, Jr Further, we identify J.T Roth, Jr. (purchaser) as having a legal and binding purchase agreement of said property and we (the seller's) authorize the purchaser to apply for said development review Owner's • / ' �.ate ..:� •. h 0. Poll 41 .,/ ' _ .:r / , date: ' , ' r M Po! ock ... ./ •!� ate: t onald E. Pollock • . I i . �... pia Gail Pollock A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95-0021 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95-0013 FILE TITLE: POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING APPLICANT: J.T. Roth OWNER: Mr. & Mrs. Pollock 12540 SW 68th Avenue 1834 SW 58th Avenue, # 202 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97221 (503) 639-2639 REQUEST: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to develop a single 4,500 square foot office building and Minor Land Partition approval to combine all, or a portion of 4 lots into one lot for development purposes. LOCATION: 12500 block of SW 68th Avenue, south of SW Franklin Street (WCTM 2S1 1 AA, tax lots 8900, 9001 , 9003 and 9004). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The C-P zone permits a range of personal services and professional office uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER X (Tree Survey & Minor Land Partition Plat) STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317 SDR 95-0021/MLP 95-0013 POLLOCK/ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 11/2/95 PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS August 28, 1995 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 RE: WCTM 2S1 01 AD tax lot 9001,9003,9004 Site Development Review Application "Applicant's Statement" As a requirement of application I offer the following relating to the development of property at the above noted location. This submitted Site Development Review Application is specific to the development and construction of a single story office building being proposed along Southwest 68th Parkway between S.W. Hampton and S.W. Franklin, City of Tigard, County of Washington. On the 6th day of July, 1995 a pre-application conference was held at the City of Tigard to review and address the issues and requirements of the development standards specific to the site location and the type and use of the proposed building. Present at the meeting were Mr. Michael Anderson, Mr. Mark Roberts (both with the City of Tigard) and Tim Roth (applicant). The preliminary site plan submitted at this meeting has been corrected to address the development standards established for the current property zoning and the "revised" plans are now be submitted for Site Development review. The following requirements have been addressed and designed for approval: -Zoning district dimensional requirements -Special setbacks -Special building height provisions -Parking and access -Clear Vision and parking lot screening -Landscaping -Buffering and screening General comments regarding the following: -SIGNS: Any sign to be erected on the building will be permitted with the City prior to installation. As of this date there is no application for tenant improvements. -"Other Agency Permits": Pride Disposal has been contacted and a site plan sent for their approval and "Hauler sign-off". -68th ACCESS: A 24'wide access is proposed on SW 68th Parkway to service this site. -UTILITIES: The issue of storm drainage, sanitary, and storm water quality have all been addressed in the attached letter submitted by Sisul Engineering. -TOPOGRAPHY/TREE SURVEY: Exisitng trees greater than 6" in diameter have been determined to be located within the area of building and site improvements. Any tree to be removed will be done only first through an application and permit. -SOLAR ACCESS: The height of the building (single story) and general location of the site (southerly property line) eliminate any solar shading to buildings located to the north or south of this structure. -OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS: SW 68th Parkway has been improved to meet current standards and does not require additional improvements, with the exception of sidewalks and approach (as noted on plans). This is the single street that the property fronts and proposes to gain its' access from. Street lighting exists along the easterly side of SW 68th Parkway, although it has not been installed directly across from this subject site it would suggest that future development of the easterly facing property of 68th Parkway would install any needed lighting. Since no lighting presently exists along westerly side this site should not be required along its' frontage. In the design and placement of the building on this site we have attempted to stay in harmony with the suggested Tigard Triangle specific plan. Our proposal has intended to follow the suburban office park pattern through the street orientation of the building, placement of parking in relationship with the building and extensive landscaping. Submitte. •r • 0 . 'i val 411Pf . ' of , r. Applicant August 10, 1995 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 RE: Estimate Site Cost The following is an estimated cost to perform on site improvements to the proposed development located at 68th Parkway between Hampton and Franklin St. Tigard, Or. Excluding: -permits Including: -survey/engineering -excavation/rock -utilities -landscaping -asphalt parking -extruded curbing -concrete approach/street sidewalks ESTIMATED COST $ 52,800.00 NO HALF STREET OR OFF-SITE WORK! L First Amerkdn Title Insurance Comp._ .y of Oregon An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVE. PORTLAND, OR 97201-5512 (503)222-3651 FAX(503)790-7872 J.T. ROTH CONSTRUCTION February 14 , 1996 ATTN: TIM ROTH 12540 SW 68TH PARKWAY #B TIGARD, OREGON 97223 • CONSUMER INFORMATION REPORT • t '- 1 1 1)1111„ e 73 f • ,r. 1 N gtNM ".- We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. Please remember First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon for your Escrow and Title insurance needs. Agents and offices in the following counties in Oregon: Benton, Clackamas, Coos, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Gilliam, Hood River,Jackson,Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco,Washington,Wheeler and Yamhill. This title information has been furnished, without charge, in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner.The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this ser- vice is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds;indiscriminate use only benefitting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. Ti-73m 6 i90 • I' / I �.Tiri' !n� .. .._ .�, ....i '_J V lN']IVr r. • • •• 4T, Document is being re-recorded STATE OF OREOONI - • .to correct legal description County of Washington 1 SS removing easement for utility purposes. ti , a r,< lour/y iitcercl. as 81,041443 meet end aaxa n1SO anti E-0 Iii/wear . f /'1 RE1VRIi I D: Gerk for said county.do hereby teddy tlr l(v the within Instrument of vatting was nsoMwd City of Tigard and "�" book oiaid 1 ° Records Division county.mu Tigar SW Ha 9l Blvd. -�/ Tigard, OR 97223 U+ - t Jerry H. ' t may► Clerk Es. i j'1 • I r2-6( o II :e l2- Doc : 96010840 F Rect: 158484 18.00 4` <E___ 3 02/07/1996 09:30:27RM T. Wesf-Po-t( ( • 1, ,y.• LI-5 7q_ 2_6/2'I 86 4443 (er,,� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f ± *1# ORDINANCE NO. 86-33 3 • AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF SW GONZAGA STREET BETWEEN 68TH AND 69TH j AVENUES AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. TW s. i• i 11 Q WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to }. Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the reason and purpose for this vacation is to return the right-of-way area to the adjacent property owners to facilitate development of the parcels; and • WHEREAS, the vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, in accordance with ORS 271.100, and TMC Section 15.08.110, the • Council fixed a time and place for the public hearing and the Recorder published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all owners in the affected area, as described in OAS 271.080; and • WHEREAS, the Council, having held a hearing on-June 23, 1986, finds the public interest will not be prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the public interest to approve the request to vacate the right-of-way area because the public interest will not be prejudiced; and • WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following condition is necessary to vacate said land: The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ordinance and it shall not be effective until a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of that portion of right-of-way area known as SW Gonzaga Street between 68th and 69th Avenues as described on the attached Exhibit "A" and shown on the attached Exhibit • "B", and by this reference made parts hereof. ,, Section 2: The Tigard City Council further orders that the vacation be subject to the following condition: ' ORDINANCE NO. 86—_33 1 Page 1 / 14 / y lw/3896A 1 P h ' T o t? FXHIBIT•A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF r,. SW GONZAGA STREET A parcel of land in the plat of WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS,Washington County, Oregon;the said parcel being all of SW Gonzaga Street(Seventh Street)between SW 68th Avenue(Washington Street)and SW 69th Avenue(Grant Street),In said plat described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Block 32;thence North 02°33'06"East',a ,; distance of 60.00 feet,to the Southwest corner of Block 29;thence,South 87°28'47" East, a distance of 199.97 feet to the Southeast corner of Block 29;thence South 02° 33' 17"West,a distance of 60.00 feet,to the Northeast corner of Block 32,thence North 87°28'47"West,a distance of 199.97 feet to the point of beginning. The parcel ?; of land to be vacated being approximately 0.275 acres. t 1. 'Bearing are based on County Survey No.20974 eYwa.��n+r W • .;n • • � :; • F. • i" ilk n ., . • 0 m The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ordinance and it shall not be effective until a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, 1 A or, and Surveyor. • Section 3: In no situation shall this ordinance be effective until the 31st day after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By t-41,04-.��r..,� _ vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this oZ.1& day of ..•�. , 1986. ' v 9,.....„....., „.." e...l..... ..e.....,..„_ . ' y Recorder APPROVED: This day of - , 1986. • t �� . �- Cook, Mayor STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) City of Tigard ) I, LOREEN WILSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I am the duly appointed, qualified and Acting Recorder of the City of Tigard, Oregon. I further 'certify that I have compared the the herewith copy of ORDINANCE 1 NQ. F6,-3 3 1,f••the City of Tigard with the original in my possession as J ' custodian of, the ,ofFicial records of the City of Tigard, and the the herewith ' topy is t correct:transcript of the whole of ORDINANCE NO, Fe--: 3 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have raunto set my hand and the seal of the City of } '"igard this, 1day of ..-. .°f- , 193. • Acting City Recorder (4009A) ORDINANCE NO. 86-3 3 Page 2 -• 1w/3896A •. r� • • t - - --. .. - -... . . -- ,.._... �^ ..• a• ti• ., Y-, ,-ary ..r:ir;., }q'.y ., r;ph. c ...,�7',,i;,'•P. .a"•iKT,w 9 r t•,• ••6"6...4, .. .�. ._ — i'jjaiaillgai"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT • FEB 0 7 1996 { ( z e f t ift,t l& i 1 1 . gl 1 a 74 CI • �.w rut% _ AV I , w R s r y NT'ft BS D ~~ Vs h l.W. 69th AVE. i C �i y ; .1 — S.W. 68th y 1 \ . 40) N J I '1 r P ; -0 r r a s W. 66th AWL.. 11,..ti "-1 r .........■■,..., r .4.•.. . . • . I -i-, . • it.. (PI FREEWAY ..., J k ii S A M[q,C `4; t.;,` First iimerican Title Insurance Company of Oregon An essumed business of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON • 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97201-5512 (503) 222-3651 • FAX (503) 790-7865 or (503) 790-7858 Preliminary Title Report July 12, 1995 ALTA Owners Stand. Cov. $117,000.00 Premium $323.00 B/R ALTA Owners Ext. Coy. $ Premium $ ALTA Lenders Stand.Cov. $ Premium $ ALTA Lenders Ext. Coy. $ Premium $ Order No. : 777927 Indorsement- 100, 116&8.1 Premium $ Escrow No. : 95051097 Other Cost $ Re : Pollock/Roth, Jr. Govt. Serv. Charge Cost $ 35.00 A consolidated statement of all charges and advances in con- nection with this order will be provided at closing. First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon 10260 SW Greenburg Road Suite 170 JUL 14 1995 Portland, OR 97223 Attention: Gloria Miller Telephone No.: 244-8323 We are prepared to issue Title Insurance Policy or Policies in the form and amount shown above, insuring title to the following described land: For legal description see Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and as of June 28, 1995 at 8:00 a.m., title vested in: ELIZABETH G. POLLOCK, as to Parcel I; ROGER M. POLLOCK, as to Parcel II and DONALD E. POLLOCK and JULIA GAIL POLLOCK, as tenants by the entirety, as to Parcel III; Subject to the exceptions, exclusions and stipulations which are ordinarily part of such Policy form and the following: 1. Taxes for the fiscal year 1995-96 a lien not yet payable. 2. City Liens, if any, of the City of Tigard. Note: An inquiry has been directed to the City Clerk and subsequent advice will follow concerning the actual status of such liens. 3. Statutory Powers and Assessments of Unified Sewerage Agency. 4. An easement created by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof; Recorded : March 28, 1968 in Book 687, page 150 Favor of : Robert E. Dewar For : Drainfield Affects : No specific location given over Lots 23 through 28 This report is for the exclusive use of the parties herein shown and is preliminary to the issuance of a title insurance policy and shall become void unless a policy is issued,and the full premium paid. Page 2 Order No. 777927 5. Trust Deed, including the terms and provisions thereof, given to secure an indebtedness of$50,000.00 Dated : December --, 1984 Recorded : March 15, 1985 as Fee No. 85009035 Grantor : Donald E. Pollock and Julie Gail Pollock Trustee : First American Title Insurance Company Beneficiary : Charles R. Mullen and Eileen P. Mullen, with right of survivorship (Covers additional property) 6. Reservation of utilities in vacated street area and the right to maintain the same as set forth in Ordinance No. 86-33, a copy of which was Recorded : September 30, 1986 as Fee No. 86044443 (Affects Parcels I, II and III) 7. The following matters pertain to Lenders Extended coverage only: (a) Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. (b) Parties in possession, or claiming to be in possession, other than the vestees shown herein. (c) Statutory liens for labor and/or materials, including liens for contributions due to the State of Oregon for employment compensation and for workman's compensation, or any rights thereto, where no notice of such liens or rights appears of record. NOTE: Washington County Ordinance No. 267, filed August 5, 1982 in Washington County, Oregon, imposes a tax of $1.00 per $1,000.00 or fraction thereof on the transfer of real property located within Washington County. Certain conveyances may be exempt from said ordinance, in which case, Washington County will require the filing of an affidavit of exemption. In either situation, the transfer tax must be paid or an affidavit must be filed. NOTE: Taxes for the year 1994-95 paid in full. Original Amount : $444.02 Tax Amount : $444.02 Code No. : 023.81 Account No. : 2S1 1 AA-08900 Key No. : 456839 (Affects Parcel I) NOTE: Taxes for the year 1994-95 paid in full. Original Amount : $858.30 Tax Amount : $858.30 Code No. : 023.81 Account No. : 2S11AA-09001 Key No. : 456857 (Affects Parcel III and Lot 24 of Parcel II) Page 3 Order No. 777927 NOTE: Taxes for the year 1994-95 paid in full. Original Amount : $216.74 Tax Amount : $216.74 Code No. : 023.81 Account No. : 2S1 1 AA-09003 Key No. : 2007164 (Affects Lot 28 of Parcel II) NOTE: We find no judgments against J. T. ROTH, JR. or THERESA ROTH. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON JENNY K. WHITE Title Officer (503) 790-7862 JKW:alr cc: Donald Pollock cc: J. T. and Theresa Roth, Jr. cc: Cash's Realty Attn: Jerry Cach Attn: Closing Coordinator cc: James Phelps Company Attn: James Phelps Attn: Closing Coordinator THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE We look forward to assisting you in all of your title and escrow needs Order No. 777927 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I: Lots 23 and 27, Block 29, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated S.W. Gonzaga Street as vacated by document recorded September 30, 1986 as Fee No. 86044443 which inures by law. PARCEL II: Lots 24 and 28, Block 29, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated S.W. Gonzaga Street as vacated by document recorded September 30, 1986 as Fee No. 86044443 which inures by law. PARCEL III: Lots 25 and 26, Block 29, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated S.W. Gonzaga Street as vacated by document recorded September 30, 1986 as Fee No. 86044443 which inures by law. A N1 1. )t r . = f First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE ALTA LOAN POLICY(10/17/92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage ot this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of 1 (a) Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning taws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting.regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy, use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character.dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws.ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement Ihereol or a notice of a detect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above.except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge 3. Defects.liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters (a) created.suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant, (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the hen of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services,labor or material or the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy);or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage 4 Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy,or the inability or failure of arty subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with applicable doing business laws of the slate in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unentorceabrfity of the lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6 Any statutory lien for services,labor or materials(or the claim ot priority of any statutory lien for services,labor or materials over the lien ot the insured mortgage)arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in pad by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance 7. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors'nghts laws,that is based on (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination,or (vi) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure. (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer;or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgement or lien creditor ALTA OWNER'S POLICY(10/17/92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company wdl not pay loss or damage.costs,attorneys'lees or expenses which arise by reason ol: 1. (a) Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances.or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy. use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character.dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(rv)environmental protection.or the effect of any violation of these laws ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a detect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above.except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dare of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge 3 Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters (a) created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant. (b) not known to the Company.not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the dale the insured claimant became an insured under this policy. (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant, (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim.which arises out of the transaction vesting in the;nsured the estate or interest insured by this policy,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors rights laws.that is based on (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by 11;15 policy being deemed a preferential transler except where the preferential transfer results from the failure (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer;or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgement or lien creditor SCHEDULE OF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS The ALTA standard policy form will contain in Schedule B the fallowing standard exceptions to coverage 1 Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings.whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records 2 Any facts,rights,interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof 3 Easements,encumbrances,or claims thereof,not shown by the public records,reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof,water rights,claims or title to water 4 Any lien,or right to a lien,for services.labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished.imposed by law and not shown by the public records 5 Discrepancies.conflicts in boundary lines.shortage in area.encroachments.or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose NOTE:A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM(OR FORMS)WILL BE FURNISHED UPON REQUEST Ti 149110 921 COiSECTED • Ir,IJ MAY lb rUHNIaHtU A:i A L Ll1VLNILf,L.L III LVI.NIrive rrlurCtl, I Mlvv .I•t- VVmrn,vl ASSUMES NO LIAP" ITY FOR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY BE OISCL(cED BY ACTUAL SURVEY w1 %.1.1 N!'. - ,'•1 --� .-'''. I First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon _ _ -` An assumed Dusiness name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Of OREGON 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVENUE. PORTLAND, OR 97201-5512 (503) 222-3651 1 , ,2 I 4006 - 13 32 I3 'z 32 14 .29A C. 14 2 2 31 - 14 2-3 31 -i : : 1- 15 30 — I" N 1-6• -� W w _ _ _ 30 15 30 /.2 16 29 - + -1 > m )-- — 29 1E 20 I7 28 17 28 17 28 + - -i I- 18 27 18 27 18 27 T T T I I I } I I T T T -'I I- 4 600 4300 1 4500 1 AC. ./7 A„ 19 20 21 2"c 23 24 25 26 19 201 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20121 22 23 24 25 26 19 T 1\11 . ° I I I , _ , , ° . M. FRANKLIN - • 15.5 ° 25• 25 • 25 125 25 25 I25 125 0 ° ...-I - t- - 1- - , I 1 ? 1 9100 1 1 8300 3' 8200 81.00- - - - 7900 /.96Ac. .46 Ac. Ino 29 AC .23 AC .3OAc. I 2 3 41 1 5 6 7 8 2I 2 3 4 "12:)``? 6 7 8 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 1 II I 1 I 1 .L 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 _ L L J 1 1 _ I I I I 1 I I 1 I + 36 - 36 - X7700 _ 7800 I- I 0 1 35 35 - .34 AC. .75 AC. - - - -1-r - - - _ 11 34 _ I I - 8500 - _ IA II rt 34 o e ~ 2 t /2 AC. _ W -i W H + 33 12 l2 33 13 32 ry 8700 8600 ~_ N , 13 2 8 32 I4 3+0 31 N /2 AC. 2'9 .23 AC 7600 31 -I I- 15 + 30 r 30 _ - .34 AC. - 30 -I I- ± ". 8800 _ - I- .. ./2 AC. Its' — l _ N p 2 9 - 16 29 N 0900 N 903. 2 f'• 310 I 9.50 - 17 2 8 37 AC. + - - I .254C. T T T + T T T S N 1 I 1 ' 127 I IB I I 27 I I -I- ����7777 9000 Q 9001 I I I 19 20 21 A► n 24 25 26 AC. ./5Ac. 19 20 21 22 23 a 25 26 19 20 21 221 23 24 25 26 0 1 TJ:: Z`' 25' 25 - 123'123'1[5'1[5' C60 �2S'123'1[3'125�[S' O [S' 23' 25' 25' 25' 23' 2S' 23' ZS' 23' C" 000 - ....I5....1_25' 1 w' i L + 1 �. so' ao' 1 9 Ac. VACATED O 07-60900 r VACATED - (S.W GONZAGA ST_)— — — —C6-4444! _ VACATED 97-101917 — — — — - - - - - SEE MAP- - - - — -- - - H r 2S I I AD . 4 • I_....VA y •..'1.0'4"7...t''''� 'fit , 'A."'? 4.4:41;".41:4.. i'; •. .,.,' ,t.41..;.;'•' • 0.1.4 )•i'. i IV 'A 'r�-i.., ,0, -1. I }�• ,.•I' r` .- , •l �trylwa•• t r e.-7`.:04.4 nT ., ,, 'A I�j,,, r A t• + T z �1t1 6 e r'-- . C 4'1'rc 4''r C; 'ti�'r" 1r Iyr .. ,L•ti'i". s 'oiit4t.�'1�1".:•.r sJ•fa^1: pi.1Vr'i 3'•� d.j ;k•k; a! ... r v. .1j•t i•1 ..0 .•.A�.e. . tomr r"^ r FW 71..su._1./.0 Tw I fJ..g T.A..-T u T pTO.' w..•..w....nw,A...,ores ,Ann ua..•ea , . p f yw nos'SEED , 5709035,: , •THIS TRUST DEED, made Nlis ''�•'' day of ZkLY�il}78C /',94 between -. .,.. D::n:Id..E. Pollock.and.Julia.Cail..rollock �S. Fa as Grantor, ...Fir'st.lkt>^riCan.T L1e..Insurance.. CCTT,pany.A�..ChCCi(7d1 .....,.,, as TruMh••, east �S r 'x• Charles.R._Mullen.vxl..Eileen.l?.•.,•1,tuUl.en+..,taiill.,r_it-i .rf..survivorrhip • 3.4: as Beneficiary, • (_•r^(^',..1. WITNe.SSETHr • •C •rI. '..c. r�-t„..1 TI,.�' Grantor irrevncrehly grunts, hnrt;nins, tell. rend cnnveya fee trustee in tread, with potvrr nl sate, the prnp.'rty .• I �< in ...............WashilxJtnn County. Oregon. drzcrihtd tot: • a' ' o I Lots 13, throunh 18, inclusive, 23 through 29, incl.ur.'ive and 33 and 34, Block 29, it >I WtST PORTLAND TIEICIITS, in the City ref. Tigard, Ccunl'.y of Washington and State of Orc On I , ' -';` r1"\ ''' C • ±,1`ly=r.J , 'ice. .t - tneefhrr with all nod alrlqulnr the fr+lrntral/A, hrteditnnwau..,or(nrt•ur lr1.10., and nil nlhrr riehr, II.1.nnh0 ire fuelling nr In movie. ;. • ••„'.2,,•,•.-' _ Imo or/Infra•ter nnf`wrrnirdo4,newt to rude.,issuer noel pretties thereof nod aft tielfurrA rum,or harm/ter nllnr/rrd to or earn AI cunrlrc- - a•. ` Inn,rlNI'aid real retro., •CI- b F,)1. THN. PUN 1'0 1 (L1 tiFC'ffl INf) PIFF ro!•`hfANC1:'ni rots nhfrrnniel:! nI rlrnrnar burin II/nrnlna/and pay.wm of (be •„i der flat of Fifty thousand dollars and no/100-------- ------.......------'-_-- - . • - • - --($50,000.00)- .Dollar',with Internet/henna sicrnrlllnq to the bract of re prom/settee. . - ' . ,nob.Ili even date hr,An'1th,pal•nhle to toondieI./IT•or order mtd made by grantor, rho Hoof novnwnt of prIonlpnl noel Internet hereof. II • July , reel /oofwv paid, In ba dun and payable Jul 1 , 19 89 ' r The date of nlnrurife of the dent soured by Info Irulnlnrnf fa the dare,Weird above.,on which the fined lnetablewnf of Maid nnlr • [+Moab'.dor and polisher. In the event the within drecrli/rd prnlwet,.or env prof thereof,nr nor irllrreet therein 11 0.h/.sneered:•he •-.- _i `� *old, conveyed' imagined or affronted he Mr Ilrnnlnr ,rifh.uf fief Jmvhlll nhfninrrl the o•rirl.n nnlMnfu or approval of the benefirinrr• - - r rhea, ,, the beneficiary's miden.all efI/jeered.... ...rifted by 'hie inerrunlenl, frrr toe (hr of the nlnh+rily dolt. •.error( rarrrin• nr ` herein,shall browny 1 '.Mateo due and payal•r, - '-'•j •'a_� Jd. the rbw d.•tnbd reef prepary It net ever.nely vend for eoelevllwal,timber.,gracing pvrp.,... --t • roy AP.. `." To I:rntret the Mrcuoln•of the. IIII•f herd,grew.,siren: Ire+ rnm•el n,fh•r•wi M/nl w r ne.te.•r peat^I.rent,rewrote: Ihl join In y'{ - •r...yyyr I. To•.../e,,, I^.. aeni n .many ..r•:,«nearer. r /,.ref r•• Mira ',online not' . rr^r toe .''reboot war note«+i.•n rhr.n..: tel Ann m rent _ . ..7 anti...pair;WI to Irrrw•nn rn rrfN+w•f4.I net hnll.Iin;., ...met.n.nl IA.• •I•'•r•+rnwnnn r arbor nlrrrnnnt wl+.Alin/ +h r• droll nr r1.•- lien nr r..., . 1 y .44'...1. tI. net r 'n^rnAU on'moon one n....nl.01.1 p+n....lI •h..-.l: MI r w-irlwn,r w n er.all.^ , Mort.•f.he • y ` . r I•^r•rr rt. I• Tu pleb w Ireton. 1 l.r amt n g•naf end a t&.n.ntUv ',noon' In enrr'e,,n., neer free"he rh.rnhn!n. the 'prr..•n .r prrone ..•: i; mare..,wnY fennel /of h..A.n fl.. .whorl,Inn'A.e..-,.I.-lni,,IAnMref m hunter...heed,Macon..and then' Italy Mete.,d am.wart.,.o1 Mn.e •half .. t-1,TI ti.ern.rd Mon.%ant Mar•1.•n do..11 • newer./I..,,.., N.rg•wl^are Moe•el the tttrhlnA.A Ihe,ed Tnr•fe..•lei• by any tiro the -%.,..11`4.. 1, To Preepb H. All b„•,nrdi^mw.•• i•lnto. ....... am,.•male. ...*4...m.mw.,,. is onto p • ph•Anti hr.0 I...rho^t!. ,7) . *h.*and t.hhllnn.•If.nea•wM ray,•. . 0 O..1...•..11.1, r .. war --! ._K a •.(.,r•I•, .. e'In, ,ern. wet ,,P..r Fr /.n. /. 1...w«'.r. i weir,.. ref •lAet, Mein Ire r .IM"' ;,r.wn mg "moo.eat 1.1 ...• ren.l^ .. rr• 1-a.• .•n t.• roof.•, i 1..r in, l hr w4. .. I.. n lee p• -‘,",‘..•'',- owl l,.wbN. to„, t.,,,,,,,...„.e awl 1.. leer .•. e-. a "the II.100/In' • nf.,wn./.jean,' 0.,,,In Ihr..f......•.. nl An .1 ,,..,' r- .•i• r,oM plFfee n/lk• nffwe• w••reef w• the .r •d elf lien •Arne.nn or(. IM I.rf•hlnlrw•.•h,Nor r.r.w ref. u/.v. reef rate(...•-..i.n,'..f'r.•,1'Iwnr. X'• '"l '�4 Fr I.d.. °IMP.a on ./..w1.. as wA,•rl•e .1.r.•d elrnrnhlr try..the rot,. • am peter fi•rrel.in ...• rn• .v1..,...,•ain't the r r r•••}}} ;,�••.. hrnrliriwrr. •f 1.. ..l pooh., inrhnl,n/M.•./«,•.redo.An IIN•11wf. w/.p(•f. IA..1, r •7. -..a.b'; 1 To prnehlo and ferninopendr on.unl..gnin,I'/... n IM rhr I,.. n I ..pen of .p,.l.•n w.wl rbloroon. tneheli.a r • 1./r•t1•.. • Ma•of.Mr...•....clef on ff. el p.m.. rote.mgr hr trio •1.., y.a r'i.e./gr./on.. ..urwt h•rrh•',w•.l in•,x1..•I.r n•1N,ee ',1. and•nth mho. I...,•,l•w I£U U.(c1J.L_ VU../)yne to raver rani..,in Woo, n., d.r.r :n. - i ao•Mnt n.,•..,.than ! ion. .. V4 ..., written In fI•TI,, ..a./ neon and ,•ling M•.r.:.n .•1 .1 .- .. I,•• Me ` mp,w nerryvNde r^ the ,(-t.JW..r, a Ile h••• wet.wed. to 11..leer..;Alf oan•K, on•,r1. i. amt ern... a the•eeeee..hot W. ...l other root"h red........• .bail he ofehoer•/In 11.. f.n.Mhnr w•von..a• ••l, ...An, (. oN w .• �[',••4! n 1A••/Larne •hall Ian tot Mir fel.•n In ...m.we.•err.in., Mnr.•,ref(a •am!the••yonliraI•n Of;n... d.Mr ono.of......I.,r.In,I n.,IAr drill •ahf /wet.l.•the h.n•In tat,al 1 •.,..•a I Ihr npplirM.. .1.,.r inn red..... ...•«I. .1..M v . ..,. e00, Irw,l 1111 ern,la,•Inww to Me.ndrn wwi,•ant rlrlar,ll nr n0wr el rle,«!1 h.rrurt•frr m rn.wlnfnf.any.. • %, riff^ AS any N•he, or into..a now nr h.e.wltt h r player on •rent ,nflf•n/., purtmnl In nth nNkr, O. han•ilrl .' near Mewm. f1.. •oen•r AI genre.•.,• •pe ar The .wen I 1). fft.1 n.1.Iwntt M Oh... ,a pa. .l.4 a^ in,frhlnfn..•. ni . • nr r r wr n n, or .AllN red nn,+e• any fire h .,A.r I•f.....polo., • hr,.petrol by. 1•.,..11- hereto.. r M .perbottene..,w ,.f.• rat h. nl'r,..I..n.h.'•,r 0., • `a . PM.. nr•w rear .11 a,,rfnA•....ere(hereon ..I io•Iewh.w•/.r n. h..nrXrrnn' ,Meta,.'a all ..r «1 A•..hr m for.b tow I too a• /re owl. o - r. : i..'..L,,.: near•I•lr h....,of a1 option of b.nrbrear, lh..nh.e' ,.,,,m r ,.+;.sole••f .,q 0..Worlwmrtr'wt An.1./h.,.nor.i,.I. 10 born...eft. I.1 ...r t .. am part rhnnd,May le• .•.t to dm....:r,^A n(...lwale•n on.4..1 0.11 in.yu•r• n• •n.al.lot•lure,fhr'tool.. I••1.•r.r..•.Ow f..11.t.nl Fr •V......$• .' nN ,tea•v w.fro any r1.,•„f( r n•.I&•of,fN.nl1 h•enonl.r en hynfi.lwl•any ••Ir.renn•,•n1•wn.l w, /e M.1 .•.M,A.h•••lw,n., nr(Are r.ny.•.Anil ,! ti an,b r r..real In% h.,..k., ...r.r. n f r .hr,..g ,.., M••oboe.oohs,••1 •p.. .n..,M•.recto•.;.t 0..1 I. T,. A..p•ai• 1•.r..1 •he. Ira . f•••,... Ire-• ...f In Mr all In ..1: oh. e'er et.e.Med ere, ...et, Ile. ,./.14.e.•n ref ,O¢ IA.•, row,, ww,oohs aAa,fr•, .1• tot l.rnrl• erne n •r ,..,.,. •Ann,..w IM ,r•I...A.II le•Mr t'•.ant pew...nl...h.ear e.••r .. •),'ti ,� •/eta yawl trop.•, holy.,• , pool o1 ••••h 1.,•.., .•••......ol• not nth.. rh•,ed at Thee teasel 1•. 1,• wet+ pove•.f••n 1...•rM.. 1F•. toot.leaf M 11 char..begs..... .1 In•or deshoetnn/ ....ommnlvb ,f,..,....•pn (A.r.1•er +h•oe •tr rent A+ef In.NS.A toe e I. am,.: to^.I ne'n•�ra' •�... IF./r lad r..make (;r n�,v'(.d anf.l Aflrr IF•tree..F,. .of•...wnf In..,teener.Av•xlr..r•.«.wwr Mw/ . ) 1 , err 1•11.1101 en,•, II.., non..Mar/. p .I•f•h.'eranhr, rlr h.• .wfr •nl el nnr, r"...."4 d.•'h.InN IAr,I•I.IAr layer'•n.whwl... .1 _ / ,t hr .heel parer.., no for prn.hlX,/ P a,. ,r, nOh heat, •u1. al.hA h, •rr,fhr/••.dew,v aft.. p rays•.•p,.I•/nJ A.flat.A t11 ,A,', ♦' \ *o.!•.." pare`'',, lv N•,A,rt runt• ref Ire e'•li•••, w•.J. ''a,•.•rr' Ih.Imf. ,1.Iwnl1 toe•re+rem.. If IA.0,1.,.,11.•mn•fe of a I•Ilot•h. •ahem•i N• _ ,.: awl IM aA I pat,•IIA In.N.r f I1..nab,.I...eh In,A•MS.•••nod TA. M• ' Arrrf eng.l A•• I.P. MO nhfl.nlXm,.drnnh•r1 In 1•arn•;rwpA•A ant 1.•I'Ih•• of '1• IA. tto•I •Irr.l, IA. •1•lawfl wear !.r rte..,A, p.n./ nM fn1•,'.ir.r1, •:•All he.rAfr,f Ire wet,I•.0.1.r w pan,el fhr,I.h1 ..r+•r' Inn enter•,u I..;*boo f Ow tn.,.I thy r .nth..than wet pm......AI - fun, float. •IfAnrnf •air. 1 A OWN.A•/•I•/ / bet arA :.1 erne •,1 IA• 'r/1.•n'/••lb.had n.dna.11•••••••••4.rAn. alb.•Ielaoh eh.,. rw,..hle of _ ]t�'?zj enrrnnMt Anent nod 1.•r .,r1.Im rare.•1., •lA I.,n.•r n..hn••nnI r1•. pr.•f ',or .nre•1 nu• toe r.,r•.1 br I•nlnlM tae 1'.a..r.naar•,''•rent,wfr• the . w • '' NIr h•r•lnh•M1.., d..rrlhnf, P. wolf n• r1.. Nnnnw, .heir h. r,.nnw( nr the nhh.nri.•o nr n.r.f In Arm rA•., in ...Moon, r,. •.7r•.!r� ,10„,.u., (h. pr.vw ran lm,/ I. r,1.. I1.. •lase.; M .. •,+. ,Air. )torn• e,1•nl that IAr' W. l 1 1.n .• p•••,e•rr•1 •ef Ihr 1dd.lwt,I "Iron lure •hall par I. I. health•'. all•..•r• •'• ''.•rye1- •t Ilrw•lM'•and AO nwA t'el'hwnl•.A."A'I ".". dn...'4 f•.n.hl•wOh ant rely^•r• mine.. ft•I Neal p. a 0 In/IM.41.0 the a Inn Irw.e lote.l 11i•a�t nenf•.,,A.,god n•,...op..wren,'Wool•1.,+f o .,ref...ee••t ft.Wo.t.,••.•, ,'•/.•Anr hah 1,o„rr•Mal ale.•,nn'.fN•reef.r'rnA•/M•Anrww/.pf..rXfnl •1' • .Rita: ..,f .f1 .•rn•.f I..-lAl. ..1 tal•.,•don er.•1 net,AM. •r,l .Iwo is •o,..n l••. the•N.•half I...•1.1..Ow dal.and a.the eh..ant 1•'" ..Ater*a 1..•..A.0 they bent.I...1 a ` .A�L a. Ta pre an rwJ., t.0 real• • •d III.,.tor Iwo hrJ•n.fA. •.. Warr d•••InI.•l . .A. I., rl ,w IAr line h, shah •aef ur• ,a. • .M•: _ of f/l Ie h a�"PO o..A.on her,r• 'et•...•err•..,..( rl.. r ,r .,t 'aa In•p.•n.•1'M M, .,d h• t,• I%a /•, r• ea, •It.awl ,,.,.IIA. • In.,,a,,tw,n a0/•. en enhn,to, IFn"1•,.'.u.,e areal •••Per/WWI.,. ^•'^• rw...l ..r .'•.pre w.• e,w•r.l. ref .•ANI .• IM on,rrl.r M.•N• M•rl• Ire•er/nN,r •nnr tool ••..0 ' I..%he IA• M/hr0 \«toter An ea.h, r..,.hl.ar the nnr.1 a... 1004. A• 1‘ r. to a•p.m, •n ant d.l.e.f ant •.WOO ..r pre,-rootlet pone•.''tale h, •Awl'el•In.r r.I1.• ...FA..1. teal I^form,a•;Rennet ht IAr..e•e•nwg allot IM•n,00(1,III.,•tot T^• ..el beer.nee •u Ir reel'r, Meer, wo tor. +A•re tor..; ed... A..r •,Ihr«d • I,•mAf..r •ea00.. .MN•e1 in;.f • .,10.1..•/ Mann.In•Al.A IF.'h•h./A M., •, Imo,.Coo n In/..M.. pen•/. T AA w n..,IfI A..I..A,. .A,'a.. n, of IA.I.Fall 1., , haler ro..l AA' 0'1 Iot a let. ' .Mane nl phi.•in•1, I••r' all ,.• and•rMn.r., In ,•f I,, ,, Alnf r,. IA.•a• A.,• /eery .th•Ilw/11,• •For Xwhwl,w/ eh.ftne• N.,. el v lino..1 the heed'.,,• Attu,(•.c all otoo• I... IAe fhb/.nn real 1.,,...,,,,•,,..n•. parr Ae.•1 ear.•h, ! • ' anan,Af vol.1,1.1 '•.1•e. ..,A•A.•1 In thy.1.4 .Iraph ,.nil.....•half hr. I,,IVA..Int.....n.,ett owl to PAP near.ero.npherein I.r•Ir. • ,leer(he Mr JNAI n,nl am,In I1. ••ref oI MI rwrl•.of In.M a^. .a. 0.m,•w .A•r+nee/. II.rr.w ref••d ul•M N,M.M of 111 11•• ..•1•.... . f.. j I dr .•d fhr I 1 f n,/ ge nnr..•a',?a r •.....1.• par ....A on,.a• Ihr rep r1.•An/ rho rye...)M.•of IAr tool....,••ear.laa. M.o.ea t•. 1,•e.t.• 4 A yi: Fiala .Mnr *half appeal. t'•na'nt. ..ear Monet«eon•.w r..r.•r.'. arr.,. .•n.. I A I he rA. Memnon...e..../O.IA. .+.w1 I e1 ro all p.r•n. F• ,.fhr,'.- real•ere,no nwA appeal. A•.n/ rn n•Inf b••• ooloto .o In fa. ....I •b. . 1A• , o,,, II I.nwlloallv a turd that• ,Ire)• IF•., w...•.•r....a, •r en IA..mle•of then N.•.... •.d,A,IA, ` ,i �..:..p a In IA...^I IAA( an.N.,Ina r all•,I.o./,••.r•.5I .A•n I...,1... •.rA,,r�0 A,•,, to 11.a.".'.n.:.t'I.'M.,..••••.• la to...e.lnn1'•en 1 ,• t b'. , I ...b. the /AI lye•,1.10.,1.Fyn A. a •,red .onm S.n..In coot .1..,1 A.,•Ion .e -rte 1 -,1• ! r rl/A1 11 11 w•.1 l.,1•.Ir.,Ir.1 IA•1'All'• lA arn.IM let, fn....Irnr I,,I.....••..,wl•.,. •w..or ,R•• •�• 1 y r r„..n1.•n.11,.• .. Oa ..t r.a;•. ......1...,ew ho •n1. /oleo.,•hnA •I yet a,•• 1., ... -on::: "tine. 1.• n • er•,•Ire•ar,.••n1n1 Art TA., 1 in.n•..I A1.Peon., rape ...1 ra t.•'' .•..r•I ,•••I to 'n1.. Coon. 1...•.bil•i . '..l.rah.Ir.h�•d• .n�..A w. ...... „i •,,.� , . „moon.. .1•,11 l:e'I,w..I !.`n,.....la,: f .� et N•.,.•.....,0.u•.•::wl.o..•r *t'rf 1 arrhwl'. 0 '.eerier .w ..""•••"• „ ...f• •• .,, .• •••,•.• ......"..7.,,1.n A.... a ...r..rw,..J A..n•wJ.r.►•.h.w A �. I..•IA In IA. nix( I•nr`n.t • .`... .'.••f,• •1.•l..w. Awn 1•r•• •erne •• «..t.4 A,•+..a.••a^I . I, In l.r Ire w'1. M•• •.I••.A., •rat P. N.., ..h.., . n.• .hl ../. .A•1. .here el .A, II•. •...1•.•1.• a err wfl... • _ '� •' A•••he *mot•l.wn,.v a1•• or • •yfa a( ...1,' ,...., ''' ,.....7..:••••••‘•', ..p•ne•.tr' .....Ater •••ll I...•al r ••t•4 tr.:.• ,M e.I '...,,g.� 4.-i and•..err wA 1.....•.00,. .r.A.11 rl• •••,• .n .•1.,.o •.,A~'• ••1 rAr.....•..•non.. ••• y •^a '�: I' n•.IAm r ntprl. •tow .A.w•IA.'.• •�" a'i• •• .• ��}, ✓1 r• ^ • ern 1' 1 pre• only I •A... nAf. .1...1 'Ink .......I swot !,"., ' r,•'ft• • Al ••■ n,..•wvl I II•. •. I.• ,. • .. •.1 A. •I.+1..1/..Y • Met. ..l ,...•.•t•• to ,•. • ..,• - h �'e ` {• I:;b,♦ y,n^w1 nl N1 IAr, oaf p• Flsl.....r,. 'i1.,.�1. 1••w.f'•IA.way '•. .ralya , • ,+.,I,. 1....r.•, 100 t •=, - .A•.•.....nl rift.1.of rot,r.•.w. ,Are,•. •.• ...,•.•A.•r nn.•M.• ro.ra nr'••1 ease ','..1,w/• ••••••l••w1. ...•,.••n...f~•1 y ,v 1 >�••• • j" Ie IA. ImAllu•'1.1 .n. Mtn'.I...th.'rM mad.., rho,r.....1.1..1•••• •..•.... n.. onset h.•r ..t...'..r.........I./ •I ..,al•'nMr 1..••.„,.„.,•• .. r r. ...,P, I•ar `,t•(.:i:.. �.`h�} A. '• 1 ..\ (� #'; I root t. I1.• tee.,,t.•. AO pew. .,.,,n„ ,•.1,....••.••. .F •nAn ..Mow w A ..w A n. •'.• el ••A• r.••yn R..,...........-••A P. • I.n.. ••..y.w.y ,L/•.:w - '\j.1 ...: r.•..1.. ,n l 1••.•••.1,w 0.0.00.•a•••h••.;,1•,.••Inn Fa..n. •'.ter .M•hew. et•e•.M.•h•1•.00•./r•.•n.r.A t n . • ., ..e, .I ..h n . R r r o not•A'Awa..a.p..y .w t•IA het.to.••••• on Ala III I - J••1'•` � ea„wl h 1 I..•„A.. real. w.,.•1 1.n w.M, .I.•11.••./here. ne• A•...no. r•.•.r 1 row.• w' •j'f' t �� rr({*. • SISUL ENGINEERING A Division o f Sisul Enterprises, Inc.P 375 PORTLAND AVENUE, GLADSTONE, OREGON 97027 (503) 657-0188 FAX(503)657-5779 July 24, 1995 JUL 2§U1995 J.T. Roth Construction Company 12540 SW 68th Parkway, Suite B Tigard, OR 97223 ATTN: Tim Roth • RE: Proposed office building,west side of 68th at Gonzaga St., Tigard;J.O. 95-54 Dear Mr. Roth: We have visited the site and reviewed available information regarding public utilities for this area. Our investigation has determined the following. Although a detailed onsite survey of this parcel has not yet been performed, it appears that the site can be served by the sanitary sewer in SW 68th Avenue. From the as-built information on the sanitary sewer, the sewer is about 7' below the street surface and should be able to service the site even though the site drains southwesterly away from SW 68th. Storm drain facilities, and storm drain lines exist in SW 68th Avenue, as has been previously verified. The site, as noted previously, generally falls in a southwesterly direction. The site may be able to be drained to the storm drain line that runs along the west curb line of SW 68th Avenue, if that is not possible, there may be easement rights left to drain out through the vacated SW Gonzaga Street to SW 69th. There is a ditch system along the east side of SW 69th. In regards to storm water quality, we have been previously informed by the City of Tigard Engineering Department, that sites that are less than 1/2 acie are allowed to pay an in-lieu-of fee instead of constructing onsite water quality facilities. This site, according to the map provided us, is .42 acres, thus would be allowed to pay the in-lieu-of fee. It does not appear there will be problems in developing this site in terms of storm drain or sanitary improvements. In a worse-case scenario, a small fill may be required in the southwest corner of the site to be able to drain the site to the storm drainage in SW 68th. Previous conversations with the City Engineering staff, indicate there are not any storm drainage problems downstream that should be a factor in consideration of development on this site Sincerer Thomas J. Sisu ;P.E. TJS/pls SIGN UP Public Hearing for Proposed Site Development July 24, 1995 tax lot 9001, 9002, 9003 Please provide the following information: Name I Address I City/Zip I Time Signiture 1 2 3 4 5 6 _. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Comments: (Please give name) • it l^� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) I, J.T. Roth, Jr. , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 7-10-95 , 19. , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached fist a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at tax lots 9001,9002,9003 Blk 29 of West Port. Heighl,4 copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Tigard, Or. , with postage prepaid thereon. a art re i Subscribed and sworn to before me this / day of , 19 'I---- ,( '/ (.1 z 7. e/e_. /ler,- + OFFICIAL SEAL Nota tublic"a SUSAN KAYE pOZEMAN _ /� E` NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON My Commission Expires: ;r COMMISSION NO.039647 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB. 12,1999 h:\login\jo\aifrnail.cit t % July 10, 1995 Marion Wardin / err Ila Wardin n PO Box 53 f Newberg, Or. 97132 Re: Land Use Notification Tax lot 9001,9002,9003 Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 11. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on .July 24, 1995 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12540 SW 68th Prkwy, suite B. I am proposing to develop approx. 18,000 sq. f1. of presently un-developed property located on tax lots 9001,9002,9003 of West Portland Heights, or otherwise described immediately north of the Western Evangelical Church, fronting 68th Prkwy. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 4,500 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything promoted in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respe mitred, IJpy �Mr!' ot., r. J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. n 5f klbov Marion Wardin Ila Wardin Michael Wilhelm ob & Theresa Roth Jr. PO Box 53 12540 SW 68th Ave 12540 th Ave #B Newberg, OR 97132 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 9 Nellie Andrews Allen & Raymond Fuegy Michael Denton Jr. 12485 SW 67th Ave 12480 SW 68th Ave #A PO Box 1768 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 - Donald Pollock Richard Carpenter Michael Pollock Stephen Peirce & L Lynn 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 12525 SW 68th Ave Portland, OR 97221 Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 Alfred Kindrick Roger Pollock Elizabeth Pollock M Dianne 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 12560 SW 70th Ave Portland, OR 97221 Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 NORTHLAND HOMES INC Thelma Cutshall OREGON KI SOCIETY 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 12705 SW 67th Ave 12700 SW 68th Ave Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Richard Brown Lavon (Now Brainard WESTERN EVANGELICAL SEMI 7340 SW Hunziker Rd #205 12630 SW 68th Ave PO Box 23939 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97281 Richard Carpenter Donald Pollock Don & Cynthia Sue Morton ROTH CONSTRUCTION IN 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 PO Box 596 13779 leston Ln Portland, OR 97221 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Tigard, OR 9 A70-rice--5 44/40 ` O r, ( ) ■.,a . s tic II IV/AMU t..l.l/in/►VIV1I I IINVvLVCIV►CINL 1CHIVt) (l.1t ' J) • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS "' 4"i" WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE r EAST CIT SOUTH CIT CENTRAL CIT Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude Mary Swintek Jack Bielhan Brian Martin , 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountai Rd 9915 SW Frewing, #23 15525 SW 109th Ave 10965 SW Pathfinder Way Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 ' Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223-3930 15011524-1068 15031524-0994 (5071 679.2529 I John Benneth Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Craig Hopkins 1550 SW 109th Ave I 11035 5W 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Co rt 7430 5W Varns Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 - Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (5071 5246125 15031524-4550 15071 639-0894 Kathie Kallio Christy Herr Linda Masters 12940 SW Glacier Lily Dr 11386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Av nue Mark F. Mahon Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 11310 SW 91st Court ■50))524-5200 (501)590.1970/15071624 8009 15011620-7662 Tigard, OR 97223 Ed Howden Barbara Saltier Scott Russell 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 5W Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Cres. Road Joel Stevens Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Scappoose, OR 97051 9660 SW Ventura Cour F ISO))524.6040 (501)684-9)01 (50))547-2434 Tigard, OR 97223 Bonne & Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woolery 14447 SW Twekesbury Dr 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court -... Pat Wyden -^ Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 8122 SW Spruce Street 50))590046) 607)590-0527 0071 590-4297 Tigard, OR 97223 NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings o land use proposals In the West CIT area shall be sent to all the names on th s list. —'n3 WARM(lnlUtnotk.m%t --- ).1995 .� �f� `Z\A ---0 V . • J.T. Roth, Jr. Name of applicant Sub Oct Prop Tax Map and Lot a& 2S101AD 09001 Bik 29 West Port. Heights Address or General Location S.W. 68th Prkwy between Hampton and Franklin AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I. J.T. Roth, Jr. . do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating interest In a proposed office commercial building affecting the land located at lot 9001 bik 29 W.Port. Heights and did on the 10 day of July , 19 95 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a land use application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at center frontage of SW 68th Parkway (state location on property) This 10 of July I 19 95 scrtu Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this day of , 19 __ OFFICIAL SEAL �- l / l' ' t, SUSAN KAYE BOZEMAN \ No P blic for the State Or on. � �� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.O39e4 My Commission Expires: ��" 7 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB 12.1994 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard. OR 97223 opi login\jo\postnotat V ��� ni ( '. ) _ HREUR:Ei-+L EN I ERf-'F: 1 t-.E 503 656 7835 F-'. ►_i 1 k r Ll r -r i%;,r -4-r :* "X - i _`S 41 I ° j;�, r t v v rwl i1I.\ wctw•r / , �‘ ro , ,,,,, ii, -• ,,,.,-,,:. r_ -,,,,,,w,4* 41, i , k. „..1 it4A _ 'IUl V:1 , ; 1 '6 I '1i_: � n R 0.`'•-g r ., -„ • •k y _'1-' pf, ,,1-,'' i ,r . pfd,107 z M S Li, ? t 1f%r •"'1 f(I Flu n4 &.- tin Cn oo ri- ■O February 11, 1996 In w o Tim Roth. `:?- J.T. Roth Construction Inc. 12540 SW 68th Pkwy, Suite B Tigard, OR 97223-8588 � � • Dear Mr. Roth: 0 / tt" Per your request on February 4, I have completed a site visit and arborist 1:i report for Site A on 68th Parkway. The preparation of the report involved 0 i reviewing the site plan and inspecting several of the trees on site. Based on ;..a your proposed design and the defects noted for many of the trees on site I t have concluded that it is not possible to preserve the trees on this site. '' If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, o4 0 k.,)\-) V., \kit-A-A_ et Z Michael R. Reichenbach t`' N Certified Arborist 11,0117 7 4 !i•1 i A' Va g t z u_ Lii t. c 6J 1 ICC IIJ OC b 2 :C4 Ce Pa it PLANT A TREK q ji)1 HF'BUREH=+L E 1 TEF:F'F:I'_:ES 503 6!--.E. 7835 ARBORIST REPORT Prepared for Tim .Roth, J.T. Roth Construction Inc. On Sunday, January 28, I conducted a brief site visit to the area adjacent to Site A on SW 681, Parkway in Tigard. On Sunday, February 4, and Saturday, February 10 I conducted a brief site visit of Site A. See the attached map. The tree species found on Site A include Acer macrophyllum, big leaf maple; Fraxirtus latifolia., Oregon ash; Quercus garryana, Oregon white oak; Prunus sp., cherry; and Salix sp., willow. The herbaceous plants and ground cover include Himalayan blackberry, and English ivy. The trees are scattered over the site. The majority of the ash axe along the northern portion of the property, the maples along the East, the cherry in the southeastern quadrant and two oaks in the southwestern quadrant. With the exception of the oaks, the trees are generally 12" in diameter or less. Preserving trees on this site is not possible due to the narrow configuration of the site and the number, location and size of proposed improvements. Before coming to this conclusion, I reviewed the site plan as well as physically visited the site. The following summarizes my findings. Many of the trees that might be candidates for retention were found to have visible defects and pose an immediate hazard. For example, the ash trees close spacing and resulting lanky growth habit make these trees at high risk for blow-down. Also, between January 28 and February 4 several trees blew down on this and adjacent sites. Two of these were large oaks that;formed a three stem oak clump. The remaining large oak tree is hazardous due to its lean and lack of root support. No trees suitable for retention were in locations that would permit their preservation. For example, I considered whether a large oak near the northwest corner of the proposed building could be preserved. This tree is within the proposed construction envelope' of the building, will be impacted by utility work and is surrounded by parking lot. Removal of this tree is necessary to allow the proposed development. 1 Defined to be within 10 feet of construction activity. Arboreal Enterprises, Mike Reichenbach, Certified Arborist IL0117 Page 1 4422 Norfolk Street, \Vest Linn, Oregon 97068. 503-65f3.7835 February 11, 1996 iaF'ELIPEHL EIl I Ek:l- I.1 ._.E•_ ,L'.- _,r. 1:=174,F. - $ III Z CC 0 3 µJ LI Li) o In ai r ce 1- 35.00' -- _- j _ EX. POWER POLE la CONSTRUCT 20' DWY - PER CITY STANOARDS -4-`� - . 6 0 C-1---:1- I CATCH D SIN RIM EL 242 8 � - _ I IE F1, 258.I• LIJ Lal CI ' \ . 1 CO 1 _ ! - -- - - -- -----.- -..._.. t R! •g04-441 -85 '' RIM 25.85 • I 'v PIM 255.85 - .�8" IE 253.45 "' 8" IE 253.45 ,__8 IE 253,18 - _— { I 12.25 I RIM x55.8 �J -- . . 18" IE 252 99 • 8" CONC. 8" CONC. L=65.00' L"65.00' 8" CONC. S=0.0052 S=0.0052 L65.20' S=0.0052 . '6„ PVC E f'Q D Burma s. , 6" PVC 1L30.00' S=0.0200 FFE = 258.00 IE. 25.3.48--• - ` . " R METER 1 WATE '11ERVICE TA• I I I1 • LSD+.._._ RIM 258.4J 8" IE 25.65 L_-_..-- -- - �_ _.-_ �� – --- -.—.-r-�/_"i---. L 1 4 I L I•..I t 1 :3 3.5 _ ARBORIST REPORT Prepared for Tim Roth, J.T. Roth Construction Inc. Off-site impacts During the site inspection I noted two multi-stemmed big-leaf maple trees in the right-of-way along 686 Parkway. These trees have stem diameters of under 14 inches. Obvious defects are present that increase the risk of future failure. These defects included narrow and weak attachments of the main stems, and the start of decay at old branch wounds. These trees are not suitable for retention and should be removed to provide for public safety. The removal of the trees on this site is not likely to increase erosion, soil instability or drainage problems. The property has very little slope. The trees on this site offer little protection to trees on adjacent properties. As evidenced by the number of trees that blew down on this site and adjacent sites between January 28 and February 4. Blow down of trees on this and adjacent sites can be expected to continue regardless of tree removal activities. 1V,..A.AULLAA, ziti c\ Michael R. Reichenbach, Date Certified Arborist 11,01 17 Arboreal Enterprises, Mike Reichenbach, Certified Arborist IL0117 Page 2 4422 Norfolk Street, West Linn, Oregon 97068. 503.656.7835 February 1L 1996 I'Ir-tk'–U4-1' ''±r, IL):Lr, riArurt type: o7\c� , Arm-Mounted Soft Sqi a Cutoff Lighting ORDERING SEQUENCE TAI.OG NUMBER DIST. VOLTAGE MTG. OPTIONS KAD _______ , 11 i 11 . 11 _ '. 1 - `' i , HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM D 2503 R3 ❑ 120 Shipped Installed In Fixture 250W IES Type III Asymmetric ❑ 208 ❑ SF Single Fuse(120,277,347V)n/a TB ❑ KAD 250S R4 ❑ 240 ❑ DF Double Fuse(208,240,480V)n/a Te 25' to 30' Mounting IES Type IV Forward Throw ❑ 277 0 PER NEMA Twist-Lock Receptacle only ❑ 347 (no photocontrol) U ORS Ouartt Restrike System(lamp not ❑ 480 included) ❑ TB' MOUNTING ARM Architectural Colors (painted linish) �--- Descriptlon ✓ Oeslg. ❑ DNB Dark Bronze II .. Square Pole(4'arm) SPD04 Cr MB Medium Bronze ��~ • � � Square Pole(9'arm) U SP009` ❑ DWH While �� M� Round Pole(4'arm) ❑ RPo04 ❑ 0BL Black Round Pale(9'arm) 0 RPD09• u DNA Natural Aluminum Wood Pole or Wall(4'arm) O WWDO4 0 DSS Sand Stone Wood Pole or Wall(9'arm) 0 WWDO9' 0 DGC Charcoal Grey Wall Bracket (4"arm) ❑ w8D04 ❑ DTG Tennis Green C O NTO' I V ❑ DBR Bright Red S C .` I E 1 V The SPD09,RPD09 or WWDO9 must be used ❑ ON Stool Blue when luminaires are oriented on a OM29, DM39 or DM49 drilling pattern. Shipped Separately 2 SPECIFICATIONS • ❑ 141 NEMA Twist Lack PE(120,208,240V) HOUSING -Rugged,die-cast,soft corner ❑ PE3 NEMA Twist Lock PE(347V) aluminum housing with 0.12'nominal ❑ PE4 NEMA Twist Lack PE(d80v) wall thickness.Die-cast door frame has ❑ PE7 NEMA Twist Lack PE(277V) impact-resistant tempered glass lens. CANADIAN SHIPMENTS: 0 IIS House Side Shield(R4 only) Door frame is fully asketed with one Add CSA as suffix to catalog number, ❑ VG Vandal Guard y g piece tubular silicone.Extruded 4"soft corner arm for pole or wall mounting. Notes: Dark bronze poi ester owder finish Multi-Tap Ballast(120,7.08,240,277V) stars ar w optional architectural III May be ordered as accessory colors available. 7.18' (18.1 cm) OPTICS•Anodized aluminum —L hydrotarmed/segmented reflector.Two I--- 4 I 17 127-1/2' 1 IES cutoff distributions available:Type ill (1o.2cm} (4 ' (Asymmetric);Type IV(Forward Throw). ELECTRICAL SYSTEM-Constant wattage autotransformer,100%copper wound and factory tested, Mogul base porcelain EPA: 1.2 ft.t socket,4 KV pulse rated,UL approved. ACCESSORIES LISTING -UL 1572 Listed for wet Weight: 36 lbs(16.3 kg) Length:17-1/2"(44.5 cot) locations.GSA certified, Tenon Mounting SliODer is ordered as separate line item. Width:17-1/2'(44.5 cm) Depth:7-1/8'(18.1 cm) 1 Fixture 2 Fixtures 2 Fixtures 3 Fixtures 3 Fixtures 4 Fixtures Tenon Size at 180° at 90° at 120° at 90° at 90° 2-3/8'OD 120-190 120-280 120-290' 120-320' T20-390' 120-490' 2.7/8"00 125-190 125-280 T25-290' 125-320 125-390' T25-490' 4"OD T30-190 130-280 T30-290' 130.320 130.390- 130-490' 'Must use RPD09 . L/THON/A KAa S2 7/92 ARCH/TE'CTUURAL OUTDOOR w ArlIV0140.,Or IUTNON+A UO,Ar,,, r I•II11?.-04-19% 10:09 - • P.05 rnu i ulYlt I Fail. UAIA The charts below provide the most useful data. .I photometric tests of specific lamp/luminaire combinations. For complete results of any combination shown,or other requirements,contact your LITHONIA representative KADR3 UdfP,250 anal Hqn P 0011116 sodwm Lame ralae 30000 t.urrrne KAD R4 LAMP.9s0 watt Hip Premier Sodium Linn tried 30600 Imams Tyr NIPC.1 P .I1RS712e01 Fpgcwilb n iu.s baud on 2S mourning n.gN law newt Np 119177DJ(R Fenno 44'gm band on ss'17101.1111,0 1401 1NITIAL FOOTCANOLES FLUX DISTRIBUTION UUTIAI. FOOTCANOIES FLUX DISTRIBUTION N 1 rei_ �� 0o4wv5AONE '4419NS %OT9IP9 1 �'■ QOKNWAPD 13500 5 I \OF IAMPg T �� FNONT ,4910 490 - _ _ FROM t4a00 45.0 REAR 3032 30.1 = I �`- PEAR 4600 16 0 1 e �k IMO" TOTAL 24000 e00 > 0i 11 TOTAL 14300 51.1 a ,�`� IES TYPE III, CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION ‘71,\''47 111111 —` IES TYPE IV, CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION w, COEFFICIENTS OF U11JZ11rCN t� COEFFICIENTS of uT gAnUN et ' as 01 ! _ _ �r1 g /S -- �r 2\ �/ 0y ._ es■a IR o f llr,�� —' II a 4 -- 01 rFA • 2 5 3 t s I 0 /IIIIIIII, 0 1 7 3 l 4 6 0 WIN DISTANCE IN UNITS CF MCU1411NG HEIGHT ,�j ° 1 2 s . s D15T0010E IN IJNTTS cF NWN7INC HEIGHT 0 , t s 4 S M A'.91 MOUNTING IIF16MT CO400entnI rACloe. TPAraV 0 WIDTH N t,NITS CF M thTUT HEfG 1tS lO 71.1 U VO,.11TIM0.f.B•T GC1.4ECT.04 PA01og. TPAIIS F_RSE WITH N MPS OF MCUN7NG Ftl'IGHTS $A•A, Y1.1 IN.le keel ,I.I./ A 1 II IV O,p n It 1-.AS i .,. M IM N�naN" °i 4..II I t .!e are.01 was tPnG•a.,Kwq KADR4 HS LAMP.710 wall 6r PI,iwr.Sodium Lame rate 70000 Lon4,4 Tom Ilepen No 11C21Nt30t Fookaldla va4.I a..J rn 25'rtcunriy n.nr. INITIAL FOOTCANDLES FLUX bISTRIBUTION S - _ NEN DOWIANAATZL1430 Ile OF LAWS RONT= F 1 110 31 mot i TOTAL 19570 41.9 i e 11111111111 11111111111 IES TYPE IV, CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION 0 I I COEFFICIENTS 1 ea ill. °� °t I�II 5 z fir 010 O. $ et map iy WI� es- nw-, 1 r.■ I :2Ii�i� af� 6 1 s ! 1 $ 6 DISTANCE IN UNITE OF MOUNTING HEIGHT 0 1 2 3 a e 10••131 rafirWG Nf,G41 0111111ECT1014 F161011: MAW WIDTH N MIS OF MC&NTNG HECHis 10 L.AO 1i A.1,j, 1(I 0017 In le I.nI 07 1,1 N-Ignn rau10 • a I, I • • 1 .V. • f - 1 • i � L 410 �� �ti� Cr.. -c" - � - � • l.«_:. t j �, l w . ti.:;.• -ir, ?),4„:ck . . - _ . ..._ . (----i • col, vIkir. 1 ` ( I rp i ..,......_.....,„,_ 1. • I l-..:...\\ .gt I ' .4". h1411-• ..\ ' t6r, rim. , ,.,• D') 7. ,.......7. i r . ...,..9 - 1 . < a` I I 3 � c • ch1 t •. J ___ . 2 t > 4 1-1 0 ( D -'.Lti. .� '. L.. , ..,.. . . • -0' r4 ,50 ...c.......,.,„ i :f tit__ •. • • _ i —Lie:— - Vf fit 1.!-,:t7 i ft 4arl s, O • s...... _ ! - - V-Olatet-_ ____••__ " /' 1%-'$1-.- ----- / . • 1 -1--.•-■-j-' i St ■ ,:,_ .L 11 - L . _ lea' - . — s—, 10.._.x - I. t-G , 6.,:lt ! ;�� ✓� . s• - W i �. _ tr• i Aft't2-Die a s `I • 1 u ° �, , k , 1 « •j ,. 1 U I •,f . - 0 _ j . • T. - --- - ■._.Y_ _. __- ------ - . - _ • +• , i• s !'_■ .• •. ..�..�.._.�.�� .i -�r 1�. ....._ ... ---.-_ .-�__----_._.-_-__...._ -.- _- 1,'"(•..1.. ':R . • ■ 1 • PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES 1 CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL CITY OF TIGARD DATE: 15 STAFF: 1/2i i3 IP et 14/ el- APPLICANT: 717 IAA 64-11 AGENT: Phone: j ) D 39-2,4-3q Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: �d�• o r) Rt�!/1c141) TAX MAP(TAX LOT: Sin ! 44- goo 90O zi qco3 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): D 2_cJ e lop vvevtTf Q J ( ej -�� PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 13u a If 5OCI;e C hu)divt_j COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: "4 -e c a 1 F:i"v C,Q55:16✓tol (C ZONING DESIGNATION: �'i44&ii or s I ' '" O' e---425- - -42 -A 14 a l (C CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT �� FACILITATOR: TEAM AREA: —`� S� PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. ft. Average lot width: _CO ft. Maxis um building height:_____fe ft. Setbacks: frd i/2 m.e ft. sidt/7u.ck,..ft. rear /Io, &.ft. corner G9oK ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: -g5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /S % (Refer to Code Section 18. q ) ( off Sc�eak w� s 4141 tio,:71(d9 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUI MENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless to N created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or hive a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 N0N•Residentiaf application,Planning Department Secnon The depth of all lots shall not exr 2'/2 times the average width, unless the par • less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots) SPECIAL SETBACKS • Streets: •---- 6 feet rom the centerline of . • Established areas: a =r feet from . • Lower intensity zones: 1 !/ feet, along the site's boundary. • Flag lot: 10 foot side ya d setback. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.040 and 18.96) ' SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least Y2 (half) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zone district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) ---___------- PARKING AND ACCESS / /O 1 Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): P1Y `� r� / Required parking for this type of use: / ,�a Cc v -sic 4 _5 ) --9 W-, Secondary use required parking: /1 C / / 9 No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated andlor dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard arkin space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. P 9 P • Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) - • Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol 7 shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: i L I,<7. Minimum access width: 'C.,' . Minimum pavement width: ` r All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage arking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: 2/ G/ i .J, (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) / CITY GPI CARD Pre•Application Conference Notes - Page 2 of 6 NON-Residential application■Planning Department Section WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS Walkways shall extend from the _ ,und floor entrances or from the ground fIL ,anding of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all / commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial compleses. Unless impractical, • walkways should be constructed between a new develpment and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at roadldriveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) UFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developmen especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas, are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and 1' shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: 1/J ft. along north boundary. 4-'ee-4'11 ft along east boundary. 1 ft. along south boundary. �7�� ft. along west boundary. 'to Gem'�"�' loullak In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along 1 „��` �ov� �¢5 LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 NON-Residential application/Planning Department Section SIGNS —____ ------ - Sign permits must be obtained p,. to installation of any sign in the City of Tiy,. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings • Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations fo lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland area on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the I •-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, an' heir boundaries is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on p ..s submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, p , ection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication o 100-year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development api 'cation. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) c---NARRATIVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. •_ Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.98 _, 14 '`—' 18.150 18.84 8.100 118.116 18.160 18.88 102 18.120 18.162 18.92 t_.----111.106 18.130 L '18164 18.96 08 18.134 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING . The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. RECYCLING _______ Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles\ CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 NON-Residential aoplicationiPlanning Department Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMEN. 40 el acs/ 02/0a / , . ees (if, lt K 'e-- riiovv#i� 1 1410 e s1 . � y Cotner— ( vie 6 6e_ .560 '1A ©n Q14 `12—K L'i4j l4� I C--e05-5 V ‘/QA €) C_ v1oreSa(Id ; IA Ge vi■ei 4,4e �— �"TQ Ic 'i W `I,QL'2 fy Y e v . PROCEDURE t- Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 NON-Residential application/Planning Department Section The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10 t99 20 day public appeal per;od follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard IC)/f, �ctr] ��3�tiru�/s�� 11 . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division-Upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) is/are required if an application(s) islare to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. • / I ' / PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 h:'IoginlpattV masterslpreaop-cmst (Engineering Secton:mastersloreappc.engl CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 NON•Residential aopucation/Plannmg Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �,,,,. APPLICATION CHECKLIST Tl 'ICI CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. J Staff: 1 / X21/ Date: _ a '195 I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED EMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies �- E) Filing Fee $ S.4?e 1 e. 4 SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE /MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies J 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds c 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: 6� (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ,6------- � (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses ii.--------- 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements ------------ 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 /1' 8) Site Development . .an Indicating: No. of Copies�V 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and ,4/ easements on the site and on adjoining properties CT (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation p. (e) Outdoor common areas (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11. The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements 16----- C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies -20 The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 2 OF 3 D) Architectural Dra• - es Indicating: No. of Copies 2C2 The site developn. plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 2_ - The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces FY"— 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials ��- 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions d� (b) Erosion control measures that will be used F) Sign Drawings: drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partitio of Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1. The owner of the subject parcel 2. The owner's authorized agent �. 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet=1) inch north arrow and date 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all �. property lines 7. Location and width of all water courses 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above around level o� 9. All slopes greater than 25% 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements 11. For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 12. Any applicable deed restrictions 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable LAND USE APPLICATION I LIST PAGE 3 OF 3 I) Subdivision 'relim=-iry Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Scale eq, aling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase pe sheet ❑ 2. The prop. ed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity m. p showing property's relationship to arterial and collector st eets ❑ 4. Names, ad. esses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, su eyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of appl i t ation ❑ 6. Boundary line- of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcel- of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines rel. ed to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades ,reater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the pro.•sed subdivision): (a) Public and pri :te right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and priv. e sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water ains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power tele. one transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations f.r parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and pro es of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes i dicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water ..stribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profile showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed treet right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to 'nundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow •f all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, app •ximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be us:. for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon s ch lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter • inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the locati. of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, includin• the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a tatement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision provements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wet .nds & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably .e shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrativ. and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION J UST PACE 4 OF 5 • J) Solar Acces culations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:Uog in\patty\masters\I{kl ist.mst may 23, 1995 LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 5 OF 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 11 CITY OF TIGARD The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: OREGON (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: 4k. io /n/W fat 6 ' (1.) to feet from centerline. (2.) to feet from centerline. (3.) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: (1.) /Z street improvements will be necessary along (s-/pee4.441_,/c..., (2.) street improvements will be necessary along (3.) Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. Pgivetc/A--/ Fwfwir /24-ftArleo CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 3 Residential Application/Engineering Department Section In some cases, where street i cements or other necessary public impro' nts are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. Ill such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: (1.) . (2.) . Pedestrianways(bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) f inch line which is located in . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's Water Supply: The Water District - Phone:(503) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2502) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: . Storm sewer improvements: STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility andlor the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. A./4 :' " CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 3 Residential ApplicationiEngineenng Department Section TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. pAy 4/co /(7/6 //v STREET OPENING PERMIT 78' No work shall be preformed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. /0 PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639.4171 h:llogmlpattylpre app.mst (eng.section preapp.eng) January 11, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3 Residential ApplicationlEngineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD • LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CITY OF TIGARD • (Approved by City Council Effective 2/1/911 OREGON APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission $ 235.00 Planning Commission/Hearings Officer to City Council 315.00 (+ transcription costs) BLASTING PERMITS ]25.00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING (Text, Map or Both) 675.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING (Conditional Use Review) 365.00 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS 80.00 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT 80.00 HOME OCCUPATION (No renewal) TYPE I (One) 10.00 TYPE II (Two) 50.00 • - . o . . . . - is • :• • • o = ej - .e '' 55.00 LAND PARTITION (Residential & Non-Residential) 235.00 I • • • I U • • 1.1i PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING (Conceptual & Detailed Plan Review) 500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood Plain 520.00 Wetlands/Steep Slopes/Drainageways .235.00 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS 230.00 SIGN PERMIT 0 - 24 Square Feet 10.00 24 - 100 Square Feet 25.00 100 + Square Feet 35.00 Temporary Signs 10.00 (Per sign) SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW �- Under - $ 10,000 80.11 $ 10,000 - $ 99,999 155.01 $ 100,000 - $ 499,999 315.00 $ 500,000 - $ 999,999 415.00 $ 1,000,000 + 520.00 (+ $1 .-r$10,000) SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT 41 .11 (+ $5 per lot) Subdivision Variance (if necessary) 105.00 TEMPORARY USE Director's Decision 50.00 Special Exemption/Non-Profit -0- VACATIONS (Streets & Public Access) 300.00 (Dep. + actual costs charged) VARIANCE Administrative 80.00 Sign Code 230.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than 10 Acres 520.00 10 Acres + 625.00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING Less than 10 Acres 520.00 10 Acres + 625.00 ZONE . . ......__ _. -�. 310.00 JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE (of actual costs) (Highest Fee + 10% Per ea.Subsequent Request.) liNosirApattyklevIpmt.rees -.__-__-- y- -23 so olta FRG-APP �� 6 - l o .fir'' ‘°707'.-------..---------.. -"0.:9.-■0------ -'e9 -: •••••2•:•:• •l'"a12-:- ---- '-----. 1--:e ....._-- ---- ---1-_-?_-&-::..._ ...._. .7=--flar.47.—.77.7.. '777— • • • • k......le I // • 1Dr*v a 111 • et, 1■14464% t o� C� , .,..;00•Lopeimioniammiwer....... ' •A f \ 11.,C0• - --_-.... - :- . r css . 1 .. .... i,.. -11■1 .‘. ,,�.:_.. _ `fin - _.._ - - . .____ ___..._ __ (/tom -_ -- -- - =- -- tom- �.__._µ :: ": .... :• . .. «: _._�-�.- .� �C" - ,-w- - . • • / . , -- c ; -•t.?.-(6 4. 1 4 r2-1 4 el._ CZ 5 7/4=_kiss 0 5 .. lel . �. " 25 i ! 44 - • I / \ 0„, ..■ 0 9 0° 1 . ii /---• <-- III . .37-4 ,:), /, ...„ v,_, ,,, pkRv.._,A..)NI • • • • NAM 1 -1 O __ - --- �A ��, • , , No laic , Zap br,........* . f ifsblimill 1 .. 1 PAYED P A R K I N G • \ U 1 11 � ��, / C.B. 1110: \ -- NI Y a �) , ,i, 0 0 o z Tit \ Q I D , CB 0 11111111111111111 +al C.m L_---+-- )4273.5 1 S. W. FRANKLIN 289.0 _ —.— .\ 1L--6 X:1281.0 x 01 / B \ ;B , -� �� ) 1-- Iv' MIN ( co NO H--71411 A , , c, x , > . ir At \ Iii MH.c All -,..——ail,' ___ . i . ,__, — -x eil --. „) ill EL. \ II \ N. • ' '‘ ...,_,_ - . H tier 7, <'l jillat \\ \R! \IIIL ii,,.. . 1 , rie ----- . ._-= _-_- - - OCB a Hiu .3 0 lik 1 pr - I411 \. r. � 'o ill OCB PARKING FH o t7C: : iI �La � �- ► Q_ C B PAVED . I c eo ir 4cB• tli lir -1 111141q iimm■ COB Q _� Tit II 250 _Jae k ! tia 0 r 'illi CB �s lAb R KING IV # !. O CB CB � GCB 1 -- �rr� s- '� 243.3 `a pMH MHC MH CB liar OMH 1`x X246.9 MHO CB �� �, OMr° H /��'� _ �.. ..�.- w■■ --'qui!S �F.it ti; 7�1ia_JQt �o-. ��. s f ' l ..i •CB o CB t a I __ _ , 1 l• ' MI /040 7 °a dibik 41 -1* IJILIMIIII■ Vi g. I 0C X 2 4 2 8 ii. Cam: ❑CB IA\ ) Ii 'CB (M ) �"itili I p il CB I li ■--A\ 15 30 16 29 io - In L1.1 S 89'57'16" W (100.0O'(1)) 100.03' of '_) A r f'° w 17 TAX LOT 9003 28 PROPOSED ti 3 Q LINES t a 18 TAX LOT 8900 0 I-- N EXISTING 0 CO 27 LINES 0 (0 Z T- T --i- .7 .. ... ›. (f) o o0 o p EXISTING d 03 H LINES N v O riO•` in O °O oi w < r-- 30' 30' N MF- o '<k)- N J b p PH I oF 21 22 5 6 7 8 -1--- i— FD 5/8" IR W/YELLOW PLASTIC i CAP SCRIBED 200.10' (200.00'(1) I "COOPER CONSULTANTS N 00 N-- PROPOSED b 0.04'.02'22' W ( LINES ,M S.N. 21695 S.W. GONZAGA STREET t 100.05' (100.00'(1)) ! I. yy (1 S 89'57'37" W (260.00' )) 260.10' - 29.98' •J VACATED AS PER O FEE NO. 86-44443 A PORTION OF S.W. GONZAGA STREET SKETCH BLOCK 29 WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS N.E. 1/4,SEC. 1,T.2S.,R.1W.,W.M., CITY OF TIGARD 1. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON I OCTOBER 18, 1995 Centerline Concepts Inc. DRAWN BY: SBP CHECKED BY: JVT 640 82ND DRIVE GLADSTONE, OREGON 97027 . SCALE 1"=30' ACCOUNT # 547-07 503 650-0188 FAX 503 650-0189