Loading...
SDR1996-00009 SDR96 - 00009 POLLOCK/ WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 CITY OF TIGARD POLLOCKIWAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Site Development Review SDR 96-0009 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested to develop an 8,200 square foot office building. APPLICANT: R & W Partners OWNER: Don Pollock Attention: Kenneth Waymire 1834 SW 58th Avenue 12540 SW 68th Avenue, Suite B Suite 202 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97221 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Professional (C-P) ZONING DESIGNATION: Commercial Professional (C-P) LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S1 01AA, TAX LOTS 8900, 9000. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of the building permit, a joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on standard City forms for the proposed common driveway onto 69th Avenue. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 4. As part of the public improvements, the applicant shall construct a 3/4 street improvement along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. Pavement section from curb to centerline/crown equal to 17-feet, plus an additional eight feet of pavement section on the west side of the centerline crown to give a total pavement section width of 25-feet. B. Curb and gutter, including an appropriate curb line transition between the existing street section to the south and the new section adjacent to this site. C. Storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface run-off. D. A five-foot-wide concrete curb-side sidewalk, including appropriate connection to the existing sidewalk south of this site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 2 E. Street striping shall be provided. F. Streetlights as determined by the City Engineer. G. Underground overhead utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities). H. Street signs (if applicable). Driveway aprons. J. Adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. K. A profile of SW 69th Avenue shall be required, extending 300-feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 5. The public street improvements shall include extension of the existing eight-inch public sanitary sewer line and the 15-inch public storm sewer line in 69th Avenue to the north boundary of this site. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 7. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 8. Approval of the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling facility shall be obtained from the franchised waste hauler for this area. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. 9. A wheel guard or curb shall be provided to prevent damage to the proposed landscaped plantings within the parking lot. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. 10. Tree mitigation shall be the equivalent to 121 caliper inches. The mitigation may be provided through the planting of on site replacement trees, off-site trees or payment into an account to plant trees city wide. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. 11. A minimum of one additional handicapped parking space shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCIVWAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 3 12. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan for the areas near the doorways at the east and west ends of the ground floor. STAFF CONTACT: Kelley Jennings, Crime Prevention Specialist. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 13. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall complete the required public street, sanitary sewer and storm drainage improvements in SW 69th Avenue and have said improvements accepted by the City. 14. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was previously developed with a detached single-family residence. The site has been designated for Commercial Professional (C-P) use since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. Vicinity Information: The adjoining properties are largely either undeveloped, developed with older single-family residences, or are developing with low rise office buildings. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site was developed with a single-family residence that has been cleared. Much of the remainder of the property contains a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees of varying sizes. The applicant has proposed to develop a two story, 8,200 square foot office building. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 4 SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build an 8,200 square foot office building. This use is classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Professional and Administrative Services. Section 18.64.030 lists Professional and Administrative Services, as a permitted use in the Commercial Professional zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.64.030 requires that a minimum of 6,000 square feet be provided for each site in the Commercial Professional Zoning District. There is an average lot width of 50 feet requirement in the Commercial Professional zone. Developments within the Commercial Professional Zoning District is required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The net site area is approximately 18,000 square feet in compliance with the minimum lot size standard. The lot has 180 feet of average width in compliance with the lot width standard. A total of 22% of the site is proposed to be landscaped in compliance with this standard. Setbacks: Section 18.64.050 states that for. The maximum building height is 45 feet. The proposed building elevation indicates that the maximum height of the office would be at 26 feet 6 inches. The proposed height is, therefore, in compliance with this standard. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. These chapters are also listed as approval standards for a Planned Development Review application under Section 18.80.120.2. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKM/AYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 5 Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Due to their widely spread locations and general overall condition the applicant has not preserved the existing trees in excess of six inches in caliper. Due to the existing site constraints, it is not possible to preserve these trees and develop the proposed structures and the related site improvements. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This standard is not applicable because the site does not directly adjoin a different land use type. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has screened service and storage areas from view due to their location between the proposed office and a developing office on an adjoining site. The mechanical devices on the roof top of the building have been screened through the use of building parapets and other architectural features. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department has reviewed the proposed site plan and indicated that the landscaping addressed crime prevention and safety issues. The Police Department required a security lighting plan for the areas near the doorways of both the east and west ends of the ground floor. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. A landscape plan has been submitted in conjunction with this application, in compliance with this requirement. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has proposed a total of six, two inch caliper Norway Maple trees along the property frontage on SW 69th Avenue. The trees are proposed to be spaced at 30 feet on center. Due to their height of over 50 feet at maturity, this spacing complies with the applicable development standards. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKlWAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 6 landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. A minimum of one tree has been provided for each two and one-half parking spaces, in compliance with this standard. A wheel guard or curb shall be provided to prevent damage to the proposed plantings. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No structures or landscaping has been proposed within the Clear Vision area for this reason the proposed site improvements comply with this standard. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.C.1. states that Professional and Adminstrative Services are to provide a minimum of one parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area for an office use. Based on this ratio, a total of 24 spaces are required. A total of 33 parking spaces have been provided, in compliance with this standard. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA1: Section 18.106.020(M) requires that all parking areas be provided with the required disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires a minimum of two disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided one of which shall be van accessible. The site plan as proposed, provides one van accessible handicapped parking space, therefore, an additional handicapped parking space shall be provided. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. As proposed the office requires the provision of 24 parking spaces. For this reason, a minimum of two bicycle parking spaces must be provided. A bicycle rack has been proposed with several bicycle parking spaces for this purpose. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require up to 100 parking spaces provide a minimum of one access point to a Public Street. The access shall be designed with a minimum overall width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The site has been designed with direct access to SW 69th Avenue. As part of this development the applicant has been required to improve a portion of SW 69th Avenue to current public street standards. The site also provides indirect NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKMWAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 7 access to SW 68th Avenue. Both driveways are designed to meet the minimum width and design requirements. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. A direct walkway has been provided on the proposed site plan from the main building entrance to SW 69th Avenue. The walkway does not require pedestrians to cross portions of the parking lot or place obstructions in the pedestrian walkway. For these reasons, the proposed walkway is in compliance with the applicable development standards. Parking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110(B) states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The applicant has provided connectivity between a commercial site that is presently under construction and the proposed site. Future connectivity to the remaining vacant property to the north of the site has also been allowed for due to the design of the site. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has provided a waste collection area on the site plan. Approval of its design and location shall be obtained from the franchised waste hauler in this area. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant provided two arborist reports concerning the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCFUWAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 8 trees on site. These reports were prepared February 25th and April 8th, 1996 and are the record for the mitigation requirements that apply for development of these sites. Many of the trees on this site were allowed to be removed to demolish the existing residence of the property and to construct improvements on the adjoining site. Tree mitigation is required for a period of one year after removal where new development is later proposed. Because the applicant did not preserve the existing trees, mitigation for the loss of 129 caliper inches is required. The proposed landscape plan provides a total of eight caliper inches of tree plantings in excess of the minimum standard. Therefore, the total mitigation shall be equivalent to 121 caliper inches. The mitigation may be provided through the planting of on site replacement trees, off-site trees or payment into an account to plant trees city wide. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Commercial Professional Zone. No signs have been proposed as part of this review. The applicant will be required to obtain sign permit approval prior to the construction of any signs where desired by the future occupant. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial street to be built with two, 17-foot travel lanes and two, five-foot sidewalks. However, it is currently an unimproved gravel roadway adjacent to this site. Just south of the site the street is partially improved on the east side with curb, sidewalk and pavement section 20 feet wide from curb to centerline. When the existing improvement was installed, the City's standard for a local commercial street yielded a wider curb-to-curb pavement section than what is now required. There is 60 feet of total right-of-way (ROW) in this area which is adequate for a local commercial street. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications will be required. In order to mitigate the traffic impact that will be generated from this site, the applicant will be required to construct street improvements in 69th Avenue along the site frontage. Currently, the City's policy regarding partial street improvements for an unimproved gravel roadway require the developer to build half Of the street plus eight feet of pavement section on the opposite side of the centerline/crown to provide ample width for safe, two- way traffic. This is sometimes referred to as a 3/4 street improvement. As stated above, City standards for this roadway now require 17 feet of pavement section from curb to centerline/crown. When eight feet is added to the opposite side, the total pavement section adjacent to this site will be 25 feet. In addition, the applicant will need to construct an appropriate curb line transition between the existing roadway section to the south and the new section along his frontage. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 9 SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing eight inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 69th Avenue that terminates at the south boundary of this site. The applicant's project can be served from this line and will be required to extend the public line to the north boundary of the site along with the required street improvements. STORM DRAINAGE: The site slopes to the southwest. There is an existing 15-inch public storm sewer line in 69th Avenue that presently terminates at the south boundary of this site. This line will also be extended to the north boundary of the site along with the applicant's street improvements. The applicant's plans indicate that the on-site drainage will be tied into the public line. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant's plans do not show any provision for a storm water quality facility. Section 7.10 of R&O 91-47 only gives exemptions for cases where the following conditions exist: A. The site topography or soils makes it impractical, or ineffective to construct an on- site facility. B. The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on- site facility would preclude the effective development. C. There is a more efficient and effective regional site within the sub-basin and in the near vicinity. The applicant has not addressed the above criteria in order to be granted an exemption. Therefore, he should be required to install an on-site facility. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 10 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. ACCESS: The applicant owns the parcels of land to the north and east of this site. The plan indicates that a joint driveway is proposed to be built on the parcel to the north. In addition, there will be crossover traffic between this site and the site to the east. When the applicant recorded the partition plat for this parcel and the parcel to the east, a joint access easement was provided between the two parcels. A similar easement will be required between this parcel and the parcel to the north. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a joint access and maintenance agreement to the City for review and approval. The City will provide standard forms for this agreement. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police Department has reviewed this proposal and have required a security lighting plan near the doorways on both the east and west ends of the ground floor. The landscape plan is acceptable as designed. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI AGENCY COMMENTS The Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: 1.) The extension of Public Storm and Sanitary Sewer shall be provided to the adjacent parcels should be evaluated. 2.) A water quality facility is needed. No other comments or objections have been received. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/wAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 11 SECTION VIII PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MAY 28, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MAY 28, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. /Qte-CL May 15, 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner --- Lit�� �C< ���4. . May 15, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdb DATE Planning Manager I CURPLN\PATTY\SDRC-DEC DOT NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 12 m _"fy_ _ un,MO�, ' SW ,� SW 69th AVENUE I ....• 11.....11 - i bolo 100.1-0. f---Q.'r-v 1, offiir. iol„ itt4co 1)41--). To.10. 1wv 7 . � a•.-4 pcf 5+�p , ( I .N �" d � �? �, . , . ., . 4 ):-;o ,V .. TJ _Q�fi&4,ti 1 v Syw�Fi ' -8 — ' 0),1f it*.-* 1: tT ; p , " . Oh NW ' I i x ,r rl •.,'.- 4uwr 1 D -41 "ra 11j:tiwt. I6'0 0 S`°rte �r I U) --� J :t rk+'4- f'f / o m s I ^ ! ^ • rr. ^ Z I I ; � T _ � , cn 0 ___ . _..- _ o 3 0 — o ml o M CD 0 41 Ili n "° CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. .A r ________I RI ■ 2II T 1 11111111111M 111111111J1 1 Ili CO Q .,, FRANKLIN ST I AND ST a I S �ject >17 a wil �v c e I s IN pf .0 z ,... I.J. n GONZ4GA ST i IlMil EMIR Lill 1 wil o I - I U I I n Vicinity Map A Pollock/Waymire Office /,.1 SDR 96-0009 N REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: May 13, 1996 TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 96-0009 Pollock/Waymire Office Description: The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot(sf) office building at 12570 SW 69th Avenue (Map 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). Note that the applicant recently completed a land partition(MLP 95-0013)which would place this proposed project on Parcel 2 of the partition. The partition plat was approved by the City on April 15, 1996 and was sent to Washington County for recording. The approved lot size of Parcel 2 is approximately 17,991 sf. Findings: 1. Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue,which is classified as a local commercial street to be built with two 17-foot travel lanes and two five-foot sidewalks. However, it is currently an unimproved gravel roadway adjacent to this site. Just south of the site the street is partially improved on the east side with • curb, sidewalk and pavement section 20 feet wide from curb to centerline. When the existing improvement was installed,the City's standard for a local commercial street yielded a wider curb-to-curb pavement section than what is now required. There is 60 feet of total right-of-way (ROW) in this area which is adequate for a local commercial street. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications will be required. In order to mitigate the traffic impact that will be generated from this site, the applicant will be required to construct street improvements in 69th Avenue along the site frontage. Currently,the City's policy regarding partial street improvements for an unimproved gravel roadway require the developer to build half of the street plus eight feet of pavement section on the opposite side of the centerline/crown to provide ample width for safe,two-way traffic. This is sometimes referred to as a 3/4 street improvement. As stated above, City standards for this roadway now require 17 feet of pavement section from curb to ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0009 Pollock/Waymire Office PAGE 1 centerline/crown. When eight feet is added to the opposite side, the total pavement section adjacent to this site will be 25 feet. In addition, the applicant will need to construct an appropriate curb line transition between the existing roadway section to the south and the new section along his frontage. 2. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 69th Avenue that terminates at the south boundary of this site. The applicant's project can be served from this line and will be required to extend the public line to the north boundary of the site along with the required street improvements. 3. Storm Drainage: The site slopes to the southwest. There is an existing 15-inch public storm sewer line in 69th Avenue that presently terminates at the south boundary of this site. This line will also be extended to the north boundary of the site along with the applicant's street improvements. The applicant's plans indicate that the on-site drainage will be tied into the public line. 4. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management(SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition,a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition,the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant's plans do not show any provision for a storm water quality facility. Section 7.10 of R&O 91-47 only gives exemptions for cases where the following conditions exist: a. The site topography or soils makes it impractical, or ineffective to construct an on-site facility. b. The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on-site facility would preclude the effective development. c. There is a more efficient and effective regional site within the subbasin and in the near vicinity. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0009 Pollock/Waymire Office PAGE 2 The applicant has not addressed the above criteria in order to be granted an exemption. Therefore, he should be required to install an on-site facility. 5. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47,the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 6. Access The applicant owns the parcels of land to the north and east of this site. The plan indicates that a joint driveway is proposed to be built on the parcel to the north. In addition,there will be crossover traffic between this site and the site to the east. When the applicant recorded the partition plat for this parcel and the parcel to the east, a joint access easement was provided between the two parcels. A similar easement will be required between this parcel and the parcel to the north. Prior to issuance of the building permit,the applicant shall submit a joint access and maintenance agreement to the City for review and approval. The City will provide standard forms for this agreement. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department(639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of the building permit, a joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for the proposed common driveway onto 69th Avenue. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five(5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shalt be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised,the design engineer shall then submit eight(8) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0009 Pollock/Waymire Office PAGE 3 sets of revised drawings and one(1)itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 4. As part of the public improvements, the applicant shall construct a 3/4 street improvement along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. Pavement section from curb to centerline/crown equal to 17 feet, plus an additional eight feet of pavement section on the west side of centerline/crown to give a total pavement section width of 25 feet. b. curb and gutter, including an appropriate curb line transition between the existing street section to the south and the new section adjacent to this site c. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff d. 5 foot concrete curb-side sidewalk, including appropriate connection to the existing sidewalk south of this site e. street striping f. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer g. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in- lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) h. street signs(if applicable) i. driveway apron j. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. k. a profile of SW 69th Avenue shall be required,extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 5. The public street improvements shall include extension of the existing eight-inch public sanitary sewer line and the 15-inch public storm sewer line in 69th Avenue to the north boundary of this site. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0009 Pollock/Waymire Office PAGE 4 maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 7. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans-Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 8. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall complete the required public street, sanitary sewer and storm drainage improvements in SW 69th Avenue and have said improvements accepted by the City. 9. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1)mylars, and 2)a diskette of the as-builts in"DWG" format, if available;otherwise"DXF"will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn,then a diskette is not required. APPROVED: '6•' Greg Berry, Acting City Engineer i:\eng\brianr\sdr96-09.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0009 Pollock/Waymire Office PAGE 5 )�V CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: April 22. 1996 APR 2 41996 TO: David Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 ➢ POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE Q The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C- P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - May 2. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 4 p.I (P C1-Se provide thefo(lowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting? Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0009 POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED I? P[ANNIN AP Ajl 2 19jTY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: April 22, 1996 TO: Lee Walker, USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 ➢ POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C- P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - May 2, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: cP G��> eXtiri Stan 04 P ■t2,l L b ', SA/".. J1APA.N. �Q ► ? v bi ev- 2,) watt^. czt&•.■ ggl tk di t s a (Pkasepnwidet hefollowinginfonnation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 1 Phone Number(s): _ SDR 96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ), RECEIVED PLANN CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MAY 011996 • DATE: April 22. 1996 . TO: Tualatin Valley Water District -Attn: Administrative Offices FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C- P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our stafff a report and recommendation wil be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near-future-. - If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday- May 2. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If y6u-are_unable-to Tespond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: A (Please provide the foffowing information) Name of Person (s) Commenting: / -� • 1)6-cJi S IPhone Number (s): I SOR 96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS - - ••••�L.,,xc vrriCE Wit 7C--4.An,� POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE RE L. 'LANNINC _ Allik _ .1- --ii APR 2 419RITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: April 22, 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 ➢ POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE Q The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C- P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - May 2, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ,, Written comments provided below: 1,0 I !w" 4 i R6-0_ ,i-- .4,,,,--(F, ,,,* ii 1.0-,di-- „Q„,i, c-c b- cloy 21/ 31-tA4S2-C-Lcri•- “:06tio ov, 7 (-, 1 KV 4 1 ,• (P1 aseprovidethefotfowinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting• / �,�' Phone Number(s): ty j Z I J SDR 96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS v v \ 4,, RECEIVED PLANNING f-,l. 4, CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS APR 2 4 1996 DATE: April 22, 1996 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 ➢ POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C- P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - May 2, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the obj ro osal and have no objections to it. P P 1 c7if etiji\) Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ,JAW ali / al/L, at. C9'4__/? Wit, /� 5 70 $ i) 94_- ,A,27A aLt,evadil (deg l 61. ) Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: alet0A1----- Phone Number(s): I SDR 96-0009 POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS *14, CITY OF TIGARD • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: April 22, 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 ➢ POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C- P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - May 2, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P1 ase provide the foltowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS l.�.QUEST FOR COMMA_ .1 NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ICITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 1 (circle one} _CIT Area: (W) (S) (E) (C) 0 Placed for review in Library CIT Book CO ` CITY DEPARTMENTS !'BLDG.DEPT./David Scott,84 11d.wonroi ' POUCE DEPT./Kelley Jennings,Gone PYeven Mn Officer _OPERATIONS/John Acker,Mp.,1 Sprss _ DEPT./Brian Roger,DeveLopmeni Rev ems. . "-COM.DEV.DEPT./D.S.T.'S ADV.PLNG./Nadine Smith, Planning A,prvm _WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,opo of, r Mg Mai Boa • I SPECIAL DISTRICTS FIRE MARSHALL 4,,--UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY L LAT1N VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa.County Fire District 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro,OR 97124 .............. ...... ..:.......:...:.......... AntetkD:T SDICTIONS WA.CO.DEPT.OF LAND USE&TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N.First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#16,Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland,OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ODOT/REGION 1 _Mike Borreson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Trans.Planning • _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,OR 97225-0412 123 N.W.Flanders _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1 175 Court Street,N.E. _ODOT/REGION 1,DISTRICT 2-A _CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem,OR 97310-0590 Bob Schmidt/Engineering Coord. Larry Conrad,Senior Planner 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412 PO Box 4755 _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97225 Beaverton,OR 97076 Planning Director 1120 SW 5th _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland,OR 97204 City Manager I Mike Matteucci,Neighborhood Coordinator PO Box 369 PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Beaverton,OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _CITY OF KING CITY _CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard,OR 97281-3483 City Manager 1 PO Box 369 15300 SW 116th I Tualatin,OR 97062 OTHER King City,OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES _GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Elaine Self,Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 _NW NATURAL GAS CO. Mons'(sas)721.244 _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer ra. (1103)711-29772 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox,Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton.OR 97006-4886 _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M.Forney,PLS-Project Eng. 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave.,Room 324 Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Union Station Portland,OR 97209 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _AERONAUTICS DIVISION(000T) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _US POSTAL SERVICE _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H.PARK _FISH&WILDLIFE Randy Hammock,Growth Cord. _PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland,OR 97229-9998 OTHER _U.S.ARMY CORPS.OF ENGINEERS h\k,pm,pa„y\mosb.s\f1Cr,OtlO.ms1 MAILING RECORDS i A . „.„7.. ii.: City of Tigard,Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED II) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Check boy above,if applicable) {check appropriate box below) (Enter Public Heanng Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council IV That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Check box above,ifappicab4} City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Chock boa above.W applicable) (check appropriate box below) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was sled to each n9 ned person(s) at the addres)s(s) shown on the attached-fist(s), marked Exhibit "B" o he /t day 9 % /Z-`,/ 199<< , and deposited in the Uni ed States M on t _' �/i day .f � y 1991 , postage prepaid. , d,72.1-e-(e - / . _z ia7L Prepared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of Gta , 4/1_06 I�:�,� OFFICIAL SEAL v`rrr�/a DIANE M JELDERKS �/ / / ` ;'� COMMISSION INO.0461442 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07 tgse NOTARY PUBLIC 1i q REGO My Commission Ex. es: 7 :�` FILE INF O..: NAME(S):pOlt6`7f A, /mire i/ '/ AL Ai+ CASE NO(Sy 5t) c( •I'1 PE OF NOTICE&DATE: EXIT I NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 , 411 CITY OF TIGARD POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Site Development Review SDR 96-0009 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested to develop an 8,200 square foot office building. APPLICANT: R & W Partners OWNER: Don Pollock Attention: Kenneth Waymire 1834 SW 58th Avenue 12540 SW 68th Avenue, Suite B Suite 202 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97221 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Professional (C-P) ZONING DESIGNATION: Commercial Professional (C-P) LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S1 01AA, TAX LOTS 8900, 9000. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKM/AYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of the building permit, a joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on standard City forms for the proposed common driveway onto 69th Avenue. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 4. As part of the public improvements, the applicant shall construct a 3/4 street improvement along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. Pavement section from curb to centerline/crown equal to 17-feet, plus an additional eight feet of pavement section on the west side of the centerline crown to give a total pavement section width of 25-feet. B. Curb and gutter, including an appropriate curb line transition between the existing street section to the south and the new section adjacent to this site. C. Storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface run-off. D. A five-foot-wide concrete curb-side sidewalk, including appropriate connection to the existing sidewalk south of this site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 2 E. Street striping shall be provided. F. Streetlights as determined by the City Engineer. G. Underground overhead utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities). H. Street signs (if applicable). Driveway aprons. J. Adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. K. A profile of SW 69th Avenue shall be required, extending 300-feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 5. The public street improvements shall include extension of the existing eight-inch public sanitary sewer line and the 15-inch public storm sewer line in 69th Avenue to the north boundary of this site. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 7. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 8. Approval of the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling facility shall be obtained from the franchised waste hauler for this area. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. 9. A wheel guard or curb shall be provided to prevent damage to the proposed landscaped plantings within the parking lot. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. 10. Tree mitigation shall be the equivalent to 121 caliper inches. The mitigation may be provided through the planting of on site replacement trees, off-site trees or payment into an account to plant trees city wide. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. 11. A minimum of one additional handicapped parking space shall be provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 3 12. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan for the areas near the doorways at the east and west ends of the ground floor. STAFF CONTACT: Kelley Jennings, Crime Prevention Specialist. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 13. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall complete the required public street, sanitary sewer and storm drainage improvements in SW 69th Avenue and have said improvements accepted by the City. 14. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was previously developed with a detached single-family residence. The site has been designated for Commercial Professional (C-P) use since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. V_icinity Information: The adjoining properties are largely either undeveloped, developed with older single-family residences, or are developing with low rise office buildings. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site was developed with a single-family residence that has been cleared. Much of the remainder of the property contains a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees of varying sizes. The applicant has proposed to develop a two story, 8,200 square foot office building. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 4 SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build an 8,200 square foot office building. This use is classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Professional and Administrative Services. Section 18.64.030 lists Professional and Administrative Services, as a permitted use in the Commercial Professional zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.64.030 requires that a minimum of 6,000 square feet be provided for each site in the Commercial Professional Zoning District. There is an average lot width of 50 feet requirement in the Commercial Professional zone. Developments within the Commercial Professional Zoning District is required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The net site area is approximately 18,000 square feet in compliance with the minimum lot size standard. The lot has 180 feet of average width in compliance with the lot width standard. A total of 22% of the site is proposed to be landscaped in compliance with this standard. Setbacks: Section 18.64.050 states that for. The maximum building height is 45 feet. The proposed building elevation indicates that the maximum height of the office would be at 26 feet 6 inches. The proposed height is, therefore, in compliance with this standard. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. These chapters are also listed as approval standards for a Planned Development Review application under Section 18.80.120.2. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 5 Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states • that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Due to their widely spread locations and general overall condition the applicant has not preserved the existing trees in excess of six inches in caliper. Due to the existing site constraints, it is not possible to preserve these trees and develop the proposed structures and the related site improvements. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This standard is not applicable because the site does not directly adjoin a different land use type. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has screened service and storage areas from view due to their location between the proposed office and a developing office on an adjoining site. The mechanical devices on the roof top of the building have been screened through the use of building parapets and other architectural features. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department has reviewed the proposed site plan and indicated that the landscaping addressed crime prevention and safety issues. The Police Department required a security lighting plan for the areas near the doorways of both the east and west ends of the ground floor. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. A landscape plan has been submitted in conjunction with this application, in compliance with this requirement. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has proposed a total of six, two inch caliper Norway Maple trees along the property frontage on SW 69th Avenue. The trees are proposed to be spaced at 30 feet on center. Due to their height of over 50 feet at maturity, this spacing complies with the applicable development standards. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/wAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 6 landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. A minimum of one tree has been provided for each two and one-half parking spaces, in compliance with this standard. A wheel guard or curb shall be provided to prevent damage to the proposed plantings. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No structures or landscaping has been proposed within the Clear Vision area for this reason the proposed site improvements comply with this standard. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.C.1. states that Professional and Adminstrative Services are to provide a minimum of one parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area for an office use. Based on this ratio, a total of 24 spaces are required. A total of 33 parking spaces have been provided, in compliance with this standard. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) requires that all parking areas be provided with the required disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires a minimum of two disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided one of which shall be van accessible. The site plan as proposed, provides one van accessible handicapped parking space, therefore, an additional handicapped parking space shall be provided. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. As proposed the office requires the provision of 24 parking spaces. For this reason, a minimum of two bicycle parking spaces must be provided. A bicycle rack has been proposed with several bicycle parking spaces for this purpose. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require up to 100 parking spaces provide a minimum of one access point to a Public Street. The access shall be designed with a minimum overall width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The site has been designed with direct access to SW 69th Avenue. As part of this development the applicant has been required to improve a portion of SW 69th Avenue to current public street standards. The site also provides indirect NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 7 access to SW 68th Avenue. Both driveways are designed to meet the minimum width and design requirements. • Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. A direct walkway has been provided on the proposed site plan from the main building entrance to SW 69th Avenue. The walkway does not require pedestrians to cross portions of the parking lot or place obstructions in the pedestrian walkway. For these reasons, the proposed walkway is in compliance with the applicable development standards. Parking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110(B) states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The applicant has provided connectivity between a commercial site that is presently under construction and the proposed site. Future connectivity to the remaining vacant property to the north of the site has also been allowed for due to the design of the site. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has provided a waste collection area on the site plan. Approval of its design and location shall be obtained from the franchised waste hauler in this area. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant provided two arborist reports concerning the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 8 trees on site. These reports were prepared February 25th and April 8th, 1996 and are the record for the mitigation requirements that apply for development of these sites. Many of the trees on this site were allowed to be removed to demolish the existing residence of the property and to construct improvements on the adjoining site. Tree mitigation is required for a period of one year after removal where new development is later proposed. Because the applicant did not preserve the existing trees, mitigation for the loss of 129 caliper inches is required. The proposed landscape plan provides a total of eight caliper inches of tree plantings in excess of the minimum standard. Therefore, the total mitigation shall be equivalent to 121 caliper inches. The mitigation may be provided through the planting of on site replacement trees, off-site trees or payment into an account to plant trees city wide. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Commercial Professional Zone. No signs have been proposed as part of this review. The applicant will be required to obtain sign permit approval prior to the construction of any signs where desired by the future occupant. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial street to be built with two, 17-foot travel lanes and two, five-foot sidewalks. However, it is currently an unimproved gravel roadway adjacent to this site. Just south of the site the street is partially improved on the east side with curb, sidewalk and pavement section 20 feet wide from curb to centerline. When the existing improvement was installed, the City's standard for a local commercial street yielded a wider curb-to-curb pavement section than what is now required. There is 60 feet of total right-of-way (ROW) in this area which is adequate for a local commercial street. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications will be required. In order to mitigate the traffic impact that will be generated from this site, the applicant will be required to construct street improvements in 69th Avenue along the site frontage. Currently, the City's policy regarding partial street improvements for an unimproved gravel roadway require the developer to build half of the street plus eight feet of pavement section on the opposite side of the centerline/crown to provide ample width for safe, two- way traffic. This is sometimes referred to as a 3/4 street improvement. As stated above, City standards for this roadway now require 17 feet of pavement section from curb to centerline/crown. When eight feet is added to the opposite side, the total pavement section adjacent to this site will be 25 feet. In addition, the applicant will need to construct an appropriate curb line transition between the existing roadway section to the south and the new section along his frontage. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 9 SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing eight inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 69th Avenue that terminates at the south boundary of this site. The applicant's project can be served from this line and will be required to extend the public line to the north boundary of the site along with the required street improvements. STORM DRAINAGE: The site slopes to the southwest. There is an existing 15-inch public storm sewer line in 69th Avenue that presently terminates at the south boundary of this site. This line will also be extended to the north boundary of the site along with the applicant's street improvements. The applicant's plans indicate that the on-site drainage will be tied into the public line. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant's plans do not show any provision for a storm water quality facility. Section 7.10 of R&O 91-47 only gives exemptions for cases where the following conditions exist: A. The site topography or soils makes it impractical, or ineffective to construct an on- site facility. B. The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on- site facility would preclude the effective development. C. There is a more efficient and effective regional site within the sub-basin and in the near vicinity. The applicant has not addressed the above criteria in order to be granted an exemption. Therefore, he should be required to install an on-site facility. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCKNVAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 10 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. ACCESS: The applicant owns the parcels of land to the north and east of this site. The plan indicates that a joint driveway is proposed to be built on the parcel to the north. In addition, there will be crossover traffic between this site and the site to the east. When the applicant recorded the partition plat for this parcel and the parcel to the east, a joint access easement was provided between the two parcels. A similar easement will be required between this parcel and the parcel to the north. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a joint access and maintenance agreement to the City for review and approval. The City will provide standard forms for this agreement. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police Department has reviewed this proposal and have required a security lighting plan near the doorways on both the east and west ends of the ground floor. The landscape plan is acceptable as designed. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI AGENCY COMMENTS The Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: 1.) The extension of Public Storm and Sanitary Sewer shall be provided to the adjacent parcels should be evaluated. 2.) A water quality facility is needed. No other comments or objections have been received. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/wAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 11 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MAY 28, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MAY 28, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. gta- • May 15, 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner May 15, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers• •'s� DATE Planning Manager I.\CURPLN\PATTY\SDRC-DEC.DOT NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0009-POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE BUILDING Page 12 Cpl - 6se( 1 ufltolt40 SW 69th AVENUE i -r., ••... tl d:s" . co fbftHf tit..? . *tole' 7i' I pa=/• - --W `► 4 Z wr mc' ko` •r 4 va. ,� r. M i tI. i � 1 `'�"� a `J 444 Lrr • 'M.K4 --1410 4 AA?P kek• 4k S F-c F'. . •• ��tffsw� i i• / Va.0- r wi‘2( A - ' FC '°' ,, . ; r , . r ... I`TMV f fte :464%.0 5' mil cN.. •• an $ 07 i4x 1'3�fb4'ik ,� _� v _.1mo Mai'' p ' 11 �i iv " '.- -a ate' p TOOL 51:11 41 T' `` �i a�I , . ..... , 1111= .. 714.+ ,.wr • ' r• )). , .. .• k f(n � . 4y r,�. A_ r Z 0 1 1 , , ______,__.,_.__ 1 _ f 1 r4 CA 0 v v 3 0 pa 0 pa w 0 II fl _rn CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. J. . 0 ■ ■c,,Li -1 II ST ii 11. -E i„,. FRANKLIN ST 111 Ai II II a iv' ... il: A LAND ST ■ C ' S 1 i ject > oo❖.• Pi 1 cets >;❖.❖.� 0- z .......... GONZAGA ST _ Fs" ' h I= I ,,,„„, . O ......... N Vicinity Map A Pollock/Waymire Office SDR 96-0009 � . t/z) 57)ceice 411 2S 101 AA-07800 2S 101 AD-01700 EXIT, �' ?3 ANDREWS, NELLIE B BRAINARD, LAVON(NOW SHORT) 12485 SW 67TH 12630 SW 68TH • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AD-01600 2S101AD-01500 BROWN, RICHARD K BROWN, RICHARD K 7340 SW HUNZIKER#205 7340 SW 205 TIGARD,OR 97223 T D,OR 97223 2S101AD-02700 2S101AA-09004 CARPENTER, RICHARD L& DANA,MARK R POLLOCK, DONALD E/JULIA GAIL 11632 1834 SW 58TH#202 TLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S101AA-09003 2S101AA-09001 DANA, MARK R DANA,MARK R 11632 SW 31ST 11632 S PORTLAND,OR 97219 P LAND,OR 97219 2S101AA-08100 2S101AD-02900 FUEGY,ALLEN AND RAYMOND J T ROTH CONSTRUCTION INC 12480 SW 68TH PKWY SUITE A 13779 SW CHARLESTON TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S101AA-09101 2S101AA-09600 KINDRICK,ALFRED F KINDRICK,ALFRED F AND DIANNE M DIANNE M 12560 SW 70TH AVE 12560SIPPOTH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TlegIRD,OR 97223 2S101AD-02800 2S101AD-02600 MORTON, DON R AND CYNTHIA SUE NORTHLAND HOMES INC PO BOX 596 1834 SW 58TH#202 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97201 2S101AA-08600 2S101AA-08500 PEIRCE, STEPHEN W AND POLLOCK, DONAL -E LYNN L 1834 #202 12525 SW 68TH RTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AD-00800 2S101AA-08700 POLLOCK, DONALD E POLLOCK, DO iD E 1834 SW 58TH#202 183 8TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97221 ORTLAND,OR 97221 2S101AA-09100 2S101AA-08300 POLLOCK, DONALDE-- R&W PARTNERS 1834 SW 5 STE 202 12540 SW 68TH PKWY#B P LAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 Cpg .z/2,)5DR gt�-01 2S101AA-08800 2S101AA-09000 R&W PARTNERS ROTH,J T JR&THERES • 12540 SW KWY#B 12350 SW 6 ,OR 97223 ,OR 97223 2S101AA-08900 2S101AA-07700 ROTH,J T JR&THERESA ROTH,JACOB T JR&THERESA A 12350 SW 68TH 12540 SW 68TH PKWY#B TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-08301 2S101AA-08200 ROTH,JACOB TIMOTHY JR&THERE ROTH,JACOB TIMOTHY J &THERE 12540 SW 68TH PKWY STE B 12540 SW STE B TIGARD,OR 97223 T D,OR 97223 2S101AD-02400 2S101AA-07600 WESTERN EVANGELICAL SEMINARY WILHELM,MICHAEL W PO BOX 23939 12540 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 R & W PARTNERS KENNETH WAYMIRE 12540 SW 68TH AVENUE, SUITE B TIGARD OR 97223 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 A: k C I. Notice TT 8496 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ! Legal Notice Advertising MAY 2u 1996 •City of tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 'Mr OF.TIGAp 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit *Accounts Payable-Terry • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE The Director has approved,subject to conditions,a request for approval to AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 S.W. 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: STATE OF OREGON, ) Commercial Professional (C-P). The Commercial Professional zoning COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS. district permits the provision of a range of professional and business SnvdPr services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community 1,_ Kath y Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising 18.116. 18.150 and 18.164. Director, or his principal clerk, of theTi garrl-Tualati n T,imec - - - - - I [ j a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 I ST II. and 193.020; published at Ti c7a rri in the 35,r1111- I 1 aforesaid county and state; that the SDP 96-0009 Pollock/Waymire Office i 1' a rinted copy T1 { p py of which is hereto annexed, was published in the I I entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and _L_____,/ consecutive in the following issues: I May 16 , 19 9 6 FRPNIQIN I ST - II'^•-( 'Ls . , 0 ST 1 IMI III MIN l611414(. •>{ •'r'r Subscribed and sworn to a re me this 16 t day of May, 199 p�q:¢ts}""> >:::::::::: 6. Al 1111111 �L L Notary P is for Oregon GONZAGA ST My Commission Expires: j I c�a AFFIDAVIT I J 1 1 I I I 1 The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on May 28, 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,May 28,1996. TT8496-Publish May 16, 1996. FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 1996 TO: Mary White, Legals (fax)624-0338 FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard (Ph.)639-4171 PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN THE LEGALS SECTION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 ➢ POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. (PLACE VICINITY MAP HERE) The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on May 28, 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM May 28, 1996. TT PUBLISH DATE: May 16, 1996 SDR 96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS I I ► ► 7 i F 4...•,_ Nil1,.... FRANKLIN ST 25101'•"08301 2" 01AA_08 00 ai 2' i AA-08.00 a 2. 01AA-08 2^101AA-.:-00 2` 01AA-07 00 8 \ELAND ST 2S101AA-09100 2. 01AA-08 00 -101A44:400 •S101AA-0785. 2' 01M-0::00 2' 01AA-07c IS 101AA-09 .1 InnE ea03 2S11 •• 09600 2S101•�1:900 ' C 2` 01AA-0•191 2•�I M-09104 . S ••-19001 do • 2`101AD-0271 2 01AD 02s 00 2S10 AD-00800 GONZAGA ST 2 01AD 01 00 11 2S101AD-02800 2S101AD-02400 2 01AD 01 a 00 2 01AD01' 2S101AD-02900 111111 al Nll pm OI 1\ @ I CV Vicinity Map Notification Map SDR 96-0009 �V2 L 164 /Li u r 6-e CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. ( % OTHER CASE NO'S: IM t-P eK- O0l RECEIPT NO. Ci1e -Z'7'J 3$L' APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: 13 DATE: 1-fl- �v 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION A(.2...5.70 S' 69 AA Application form (1) . , / ( 1.!"(B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO.7;17g 41q4- $147(1 authorization al/b• a _ . Q' ?Jr. 'j.! (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE /S,c:yr) sxan- yy (D) Assessor's map (1) /4 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* ,ca, „ dl''/ } ( (E lot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS /e3' 5-W58 ZGZ PHONE (F) Applicant's statement CITY ,Ql1-(L 1L9( QjL ZIP 97224 2'? 4373 4 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* `P.t-�1 po_l S p_ut,ithyni:vti_ 6, 0- 03) ) List of property owners and ADDRESS /,25 4/6 ,SuJ („51 ' ' PHONE 39 addresses within 250 feet (1) / CITY 7 a/el �_ ZIP 9'7z13 (H) Filing fee ($ i, 2'(2 ) ! *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERM D BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written U/ 2- qtr‘ authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY G 6 P The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to X er: �z allow df o< ,9004%.1,74" o( &xx Sy. ogIcAL Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 • 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: Ai/i4 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. (A)/ .. C.lat_ (KSL:pm/0524P) Jib CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0009 FILE TITLE: POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE APPLICANT: R & W Partners OWNER: Don Pollock Kenneth Waymire 1834 SW 58th Avenue, Suite 202 12540 SW 68th Avenue, Suite B Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 292-4373 (503) 620-7035 or 639-2639 REQUEST: The applicant requests approval to develop a 8,200 square foot office building. LOCATION: 12570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lots 8900 and 9000). ZONE: Commercial Professional (C-P). The Commercial Professional zoning district permits the provision of a range of professional and business services. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.150 and 18.12. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317 SDR 96-0009 POLLOCK/WAYMIRE OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUL-25-1995 15:46 FROM T. Roth Const. Inc. TO P.01 • Sad. c/6 -060 �c? L E T T E R O F F A C S I M I L E T R A N S M I T T A L G TO: ,64 II 719Qr;s1 • Project: , eV/ ta : Ar• Fax i roJ1 g? Attn: 40(1 .�4 7' i WE ARE SENDING YOU -' Herewith _ Other means __ Shop drawings Correspondence Specs Invoices Proposals _ Copy of letter __ Change order __ Plans __ Contract __ Sub. Info. Co.ies xx Date tr Ref. # xx Descri .tion *t I i-/0-95 444.4i,t 0/' i7"/ L- 1 f 11 f ' - . 0 rwI i•i Q . .,_ .,„,„ .e.- 1 7-lo -95 Ott r4.cr of TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES ■ INCLUDING THIS PAGE HARD COPY TO FOLLOW (YES) (NO UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUESTED) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: _ For approval _ As requested ' For your use _ For you to sign/return REMARKS: � w 0 '6e L &G (4 ' -,T ca, a ,,..,,,„ . _______„_„ ezi .... ., j)„....5- ,...._A.,./fe.".../. SI GNE,: /1,4___, ._ ' y DATE: f Tim Roth J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. Return Fax No. 624-0239 12540 S.W. 68th Pkwy,Ste. B. Tigard, Oregon 97223-8588 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 . JUG 25 1 15:q? moot/ r. Rath Cast. Inc. TO P.e2 pr°�d e�efoUc 'rra !ot S9°I°ClN � ' 2, eloP 3 e x t Ju J3,24, 1995 Public x pry fo rptopos�S alne / Ad SS 2 3 / Cl�'��i 4 l Time S � l s��i�'r'e 1p 9 ,.1 L.-__ __L 11 12 l /�j13 / ''�/14 Coinments: ,... .J-----„,1:....„\-. A IWAO4r‘p= - , ,,, --,001%ft, * ,,,,,,,, 410.1....- keit, - -- JUL-25-1995 15 47 FROM - T. Roth Const. Inc. TO P.03 AFFIDAVIT OF MAIUNG STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) L J.T. Roth, Jr. , being duly sworn. depose and say that on 7-10-95 19 , 1 calmed to have mailed to each of the pees on the attached list a notes of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at t ,lots 9001.9002,9003 ink 29 of West Port. Heigh copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof I bather state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Tigard, Or. with postage prepaid thereon. LOIf Subscribed and sworn to before rise this /'& day of \i‘e � � OFFtCIAL SEAL �-s'. SUSAN KAYE BOi*EMAN H'' • 'UbilC �- /�- 4 NOTARY CUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: COMMISSION NO.039647 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FES.t 2, 999 =�b8 \1°�atrTmeil-dt JUL-25-1995 15:47 FROM - T. Roth Const. Inc. TO P.04 July 10, 1995 Marion Wardin Ila Wardin PO Box 53 Newberg, Or. 97132 Re: Land Use Notification Tax lot 9001,9002,9003 Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on July 24, 1995 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12540 SW 68th Prkwy, suite B. I am proposing to develop approx. 18,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located on tax lots 9001,9002,9003 of West Portland Heights, or otherwise described immediately north of the Western Evangelical Church, fronting bath Prkwy_ Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 4,500 sq.ft, of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything promoted in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respe, Mmitted, e. rti • ot , r. J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. JUL-25-1995 15 48 FROM ' T. Roth Const. Inc. TO P.05 Marion Wardin Ila Wardin Michael Wilhelm ob & Theresa Roth Jr. PO Box 53 12540 SW-, 68th Ave 12540 th Ave #B Newberg, OR 97132 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 9 Nellie Andrews Allen & Raymond Fuegy Michael Denton Jr., 12485 SW 67th Ave 12480 SW 68th Ave #A PO Box 1768 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 ::: -ice - Donald Pollock Richard Carpenter Michael Pollock Stephen Peirce & L Lynn 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 • 1834 SWc58th Ave' #202 12525 SW 68th Ave Portland, OR 97221 Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 Alfred Kindrick Roger Pollock Elizabeth Pollock M Dianne 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 • 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 - 12560 SW 70th Ave Portland, OR 97221 ' 7 OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 ..•.- 2 • NORTHLAND HOMES INC Thelma Cutshall OREGON KI SOCIETY 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 12705 SW 67th Ave 12700 SW 68th Ave Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Richard Brown Lavon (Now Brainard WESTERN EVANGELICAL SEMI 7340 SW Hunziker Rd #205 12630 SW 68th Ave PO Box 23939 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97281 Richard Carpenter Donald Pollock' Don & Cynthia Sue Morton OTH CONSTRUCTION IN 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 PO Box 596 • 13779 leston Ln Portland, OR 97221 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Tigard, OR 9' • ,1/4.11 • r Jr t n..ji utiV 11..,IJIViivIVIV I i I I IV V '.JL V CIVIEIN I 1 CNIVIJ kl,i R 'J) • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS • • ti ' '- `r"'4 t°.� WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE " ;it�4�::= '"�•; f_; SOUTH CIT: 'Y x, CENTRAIL CIT.' UD. Al3dullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude Mary Swintek ; Jack Bieihan Brian Martin ui 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 1 2200 SW Bull Mounlai Rd 9915 SW Frewing, #23 15525 SW 1091h Ave i 10965 SW Pathfinder Way , Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 I Tigard, OR 97223-3930 1 cn Non MOM /$O1112/-0914 GO11619-1119 I W Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith i. John Berrnelh Craig F 1o})ki51s 1550 SW 10901 Ave m 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Co rt o 7430 SW Varn's Street Tigard, OR 97224 ° Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 ' Tigard, OR 97223 iron 9216119 1937114-4990 (Selo 6194894 g Kathie Kallio Christy Hen Linda Masters I -i 12940 SW Glacier lily Dr 11386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st A nue l Mark F. Mahon • Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 11310 SW 91st Court o 1 OOP$90,197QR1o1117a loe9 (90)1610.7667 Tigard, OR 97223 T n •Ed Howden Barbara Saltier Scott Russell : j o 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 SW Merger/Court 31291 Raymond Cr 1 Road 1 Joel Stevens Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Scappoose, OR 9705r I 9660 SW Ventura Cour 1901)Ha 60ro MI 6e1.9103 csoJ1111.2a1a T igard, OR 97223 Bonne & Jim Roach Tune Sulffridge Cal Woolery • 14447 5W Twekesbury Dr 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd C. ►t Pat Wyden Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 8122 SW Spruce Street MOO 9900111 M1 190-03/3 Mil 1904]17 V Tigard, OR 97223 ; o • NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings • land use proposals In the West CIT area shall be sent to all the names on t list:. ntwnaltetmoneburit 999 W. - • 0 cn 1 L JUL-25-1995 15:49 FROM T T. Roth Const. Inc. TO P.0? Name of applicant J.T. Roth, Jr. Subject Property Tax Map and tat l 25101.AD 09001 Bik 29 West Port. Heights Addms or Genera! Location S.W. 68th Prkwy between Hampton and Franklin AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I. J.T. Roth, Jr. , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed office commercial bvildinq affecting the land located at let 9001 blk 29 W.Port. Heights �_ and did on the 10 day of July , 19 0c. 'J personalty Post notice indicating that the siteY proposed far a land use application. and the time. date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposaL The sign was Posted ex center frontage of SW 68th Parkwa (State location on property) This 10 . of July . 1s II4f-ii-?11, Subscribed and sworn to. affirmed. before me this / ' ' � day cf e (y , 19 9S SUSAN KAYE VOZEMAN im I .L ,ilia � .irf/"(/ OFFICIAL SEAL `� NOYARY PUBLIGOREGON No ic for the State O ., •n COMMISSION No.erica My Commission Expires: -� " /�- / M1"COMMISSION EXPIRES FEF; I2,19?9 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City ofTigard Planning 0Neision i 0 13125 SW Hail 3lvd. Tigard. OR 97223 V 1 JO 1' AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGAAD ) I, Jacob T. Roth. Jr. , being duly sworn, depose and say that on January 15 , 19 96 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persona on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 12570 SW 69th Ave,Tigard, OR Tax Lot #* 9000/8900 , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Tigard, Oregon , with postage prepaid thereon. LI) - ign turf Subscribed and sworn to before me this i 1 day of t , 19 q(D . II _� if _411116. I:�• OFFICIAL SEAL ry Public 1 r� iv �/�g I ( `T ! : ERICA C MC CRARY My Commission Ex fires, � ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON y p r..� COMMISSION NO.045433 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 16,1999 h:\l o g i n\j o\aifm ai 1.cit Notification List for Land Use Proposals East CIT Mary Swintek 9915 SW Frewing #23 Tigard, OR 97223 v Craig Hopkins 7430 SW Varns Street Tigard, OR 97223 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Y/Jcel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, OR 9722.3 Ni Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 NEIGHBORS WITHIN 250 FEET -***************CAR-RT SORT**C003 ****************CAR-RT SORT**C003 Michael Wilhelm Nellie Andrews 12540 SW 68th Ave 12485 SW 67th Ave Tigard, OR 97223-8588 Tigard, OR 97223-8505 ****************CAR-RT SORT**C062 ****************CAR-RT SORT**C062 Donald Pollock Michael Pollock Richard Carpenter 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Portland, OR 97221-1436 Portland_ OR 97221 -1436 .1 =K:-i:=K:t::K:K*:k*:1i;K K***CAR-ST SORT**C003 ****************CAR-RT SORT**C062 Stephen Peirce & L Lynn Roaer Pollock 12525 SW 68th Ave 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Tigard . OR 97223-R510 Portland . OR 9722.1-1436 k*-*=****=********(.;AR-RT SORT*=*C047 =** :************-*CAR-RT SORT**C003 ****************CAR-RT SORT**C003 .1. fred Kindrick & M Dianne Thelma Cutshall OREGON KI SOCIETY 2560 SW 70th Ave 12705 SW 67th Ave 12700 SW 68th Ave Tigard , OF 97223-'2512 Tigard, OR °7223-8302 Tigard, OR 97223-8339 sz**A.K*-K-K:k:K-K.K*CAR.-RT SORT-r*C00'2 ***************CAR-RT SORT**C003 ****************CAR-RT SORT**C062 '?.chard Brown Lavon ( Now Short) Brainard Richard Carpenter 7340 SW Hunziker Rd #205 12630 SW 68th Ave Donald Pollock Tigard, OR 97223-2304 Tigard, OR 97223-8338 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Portland, OR 97221-1436 +: K;******:********CAR-RT SORT*:*B007 ****************CAR-RT SORT**C053 :)on & Cynthia Sue Morton Mark Dana PO Box 596 11632 SW 31st Ct _.aka Oswego, OR 97034-0065 Portland, OR 97219-9223 SIGN UP Public Hearing for Proposed Site Development Feb. 01, 1996 tax lot 9000/8900 Please provide the following information: Name I Address I City/Zip I Time Signiture 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Comments: (Please give name) Name of applicant Jacob T. Roth, Jr. ' Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot a► Tax Lot 9000/8900 Address or General Location 12570 SW 69th Ave. , Tigard, OR AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, Jacob T. Roth, Jr. , do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating interest In a proposed professional office building affecting the land located at 12570 SW 69th Ave. , Tigard, OR and did on the 15th day of ' January , 19 96 personally post notice indicating thr the site may be proposed for a professional office building application, and the time, date and place of neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal The sign was posted at site on 12570 SW 69th Ave. , Tigard (state location on property) This J5t5 day ofti• , 19 _ Signs Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this I _ day of r►l.)G , 19 qq(49`.J �� _ ERICA ICI LSEAL Y Public for the State • 0 -soh ►I IOW ,�' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires:\"^' COMMISSION NO.045433 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 16,1999 WTTHiN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 login\jc\pcstnotert PERMIT NO. ��% lO� CITY OF TIGARD - TREE REMOVAL PERMIT A COPY OF THIS FORM MUST BE CLEARLY POSTED ON SITE OR IN THE POSSESSION OF THE PERSON REMOVING THE TREES DURING ALL TREE REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION �ax low go o° t e.S141°6f' 7,4, TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2075 /7-- recl�i5 ZONIN G�-� T 4��G� L PROPERTY OWNER• LL} "a-r7/7E-,-(e-5 SIGNATU I ADDRESS PHONE CITY ZIP APPLICANT• �/- T S1GNATUR ADDRESS 4,15dio SGU (Z 45 PHONE g,p -60_57 CITY �GZ,c2J CR_ ZIP 97 3 BUSINESS NAME 7-7/Z1-4-- C... .-4874 ' When the owner and applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession of written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided or submit a written authorization with this application. 2. REASON(S) FOR TREE REMOVAL l074 P� wa_411Lr ��/� . �� L+A can Q r 3. RELATED LAND USE APPROVAL CASE NUMBER (if applicable) -.24? 15 - 7 (40'4'01 tj e 4. Please attach a photocopy of a tax map or site plan to the back of this form. A larger site plan may be submitted if necessary to adequately address the proposed tree removal. The site plan shall show: 1) The location of the subject site 2) All proposed or existing structures 3) All easements, dedications, streams, wetlands, etc. 4) All trees over six inches in caliper size, measured four feet above grade 5) Basic indentification of tree types (common names) SITE PLAN Tree protection plan required Yes V No Arborist's Report Required: y Yes No Additional Comments and/or Conditions of Approval : 1 ve �d e� �� frt - yes- f i2 406/e_ 7 o c e_ -(4C( ) (49 tiOloi-e4)6,4 V/d 2 We `I THIS PERMIT EXPIRES ON 9/71q 7 UNLESS A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION IS SUBMITTED TO T NG DIVISION PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THIS PERMIT APPROVAL. 1 3 /Q �� Approved by "i..■ ,=A: ✓ Title Date H:LOGIN\DS T S\TREE.PMT . . Tree Plan Parcel 1, 68th Avenue Driveway Easement and Adjacent Area Prepared for Tim Roth J.T. Roth Construction 12540 SW 68th Pkwy, Suite B Tigard, OR 97223-8588 503-639-2639 Prepared by Mike Reichenbach Certified Arborist 110117 Arboreal Enterprises 4422 Norfolk Street West Linn, Oregon 97068 503-656-7835 February 25, 1996 Tree Plan Parcel 1, J.T. both Construction On Saturday, February 10, 1996, and Sunday, February 25, 1996 I conducted a site visit to inspect trees adjacent to and in the easement for Parcel 1. This easement is for a proposed driveway that will be common to both Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. A map and Tree Schedule for Parcel 2 is attached. Tree Protection Measures The trees have been identified and are shown on the Tree Plan Map prepared by Arboreal Enterprises, dated February 25, 1996. Tree protection measures should be taken to protect trees 5, 18, 24 and 37 and 38. Specifically: Before construction: 1. Remove trees marked for removal. See the Schedule of Trees in the appendix; • Tree falling, skidding and loading will be done to avoid damage to the remaining trees by falling trees in proposed roadways, driveways, utility corridors, building pads and areas with no trees. Methods that may be used to avoid damage to the remaining trees will include wedges, ropes and removing trees in pieces. 2. Remove English ivy and construction debris from around trees 37 and 38. These trees could not be inspected for their potential risk of failure. After the removal of the ivy and debris the consulting urban forester/certified arborist will inspect these trees for obvious defects. 3. Mark boundaries of construction envelopes. The construction envelope includes everything within five feet of the demolition site, building sites, roadways, paths, utilities and material storage areas as shown on the site plan. • Install tree protection fencing, (3' min. height orange PVC or equivalent) at the perimeter of the construction envelope. All fencing will be installed prior to demolition or construction. It will remain in place for the duration of the project. The placement of the fencing will be inspected by the consulting urban forester/certified arborist or a designated representative. Fencing will be placed to protect as much of the critical root zone' as possible. • Through written and verbal communication, inform all construction personnel about the need to protect trees and root zones. IA distance equal to one foot from the trunk of the tree for every 1" of DBH. Mike Reichenbach,Arboreal Enterprises Page 1 4422 Norfolk Street West Linn,OR 97068 503-656-7835 02/25/96 ( b ( tit cLtes Tree Plan Parcel 1, J.T. both Construction • Restrict material storage, vehicle and equipment movement, and all other construction activity to areas outside the root zones of trees to be protected; During demolition or construction; • The trees most likely to be damaged during construction are located within 10 feet of the construction envelope. Trees within this area may be subject to root injury. During and after demolition and construction the consulting urban forester/certified arborist will inspect all protected trees within 10 feet of the construction envelope. • The consulting urban forester shall monitor construction progress to assure compliance with the tree protection and preservation requirements. • Pruning and cabling may be recommended for those trees that are to be protected. Tree care operations shall be directed, and inspected by the consulting urban forester/certified arborist. Pruning will be performed by companies employing International Society of Arboriculture, Pacific Northwest Chapter Certified Arboricultural Technicians or ISA Certified Arborists. Tree Removal Due to their generally poor condition, lack of taper and previous injuries, all trees within the easement are at high risk of failure. These trees, numbered 1, 7, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34, and 35 are hazardous and should be removed. Further, trees adjacent to the easement that are hazardous and should be removed include 3, 4, 6, 30, 31, 32, and 39. Mitigation Measures Mitigation will be required for the removal of tree number 2. Tree number 2 is an Oregon white oak 28 inches in diameter. Mitigation consists of the planting of trees as shown on the landscape plan. Mike Reichenbach,Arboreal Enterprises Page 2 4422 Norfolk Street West Linn.OR 97068 503-656-7835 02/25/96 Tree Schedule, Parcel 2, 69th Ave. Tigard Prepared for J.T. Roth Construction Action: Conduct detailed inspection Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments �7 Oregon white oak 32 Fair Not determined debris pile between tree and house obeurea the lower 3 feet of the trunk. the trunk is completely covered with vines. Diameter estimated due to vines 38 Oregon ash 26 Fair Not determined vines obscure view,diameter estimated due to vines. Action: Potential for retention Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments 5 Oregon white oak 28 Fair Low;No major defects narrow crown,few limbs for height of tree noted 18 Oregon white oak 8 Fair Low;No major defects noted 24 Oregon ash 10 Fair Low;No major defects vines obscure trunk and base noted Action: Remove Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments willow species 12 Poor High;Major defects 40%of crown is dead,root decay is evident noted Oregon white oak 18 Poor High;Major defects Extremely narrow crown,stem subject to breakage na�aa noted 4 Oregon ash 9 Poor High;Major defects Poor form,crooked stem noted Prepared by Michael R.Reichenbach,Certified Arborist ILO 117 Sunday,February 25, 1996 Arboreal Enterprises,4422 Norfolk St_,West Linn,OR 97068. 503-656-7835 Page 1 of 5 T``` r� prePered f ���� oryr Rot6C, ��� Parcel 1 ��� 2� Rer,oF. `�_ ` ��e • . T�gar Tree# d . risaiso C°ntntan 1�n me�'�g°r,.,/r Diameter g Condition -,\ Poor I!�$rd P:tenth,Ffi l 8 h°wUtamcBPecrpad`f�tr jo0mments ��,■ hOtcd �c8on%its oak , Poor at but fDrkW fop �� 24 Ffigh,!Ajar �`8°n white° Fair n defects 3 10 ?q Fii skink lareeat is 7^ Afa jor defects Oregon white oak p� .the 4111414 11 ire 22 FF;Bh.Ma noted /VsRUwCrown, snow 6M Bon ash fOr dcf dui y Lkad had), 1? Oregon am /q Poor fligli.Af d nta �wound at bve oft be aub j �eeh.ge j f an,v�Poor form be eon Poor n efens Le into the c dY r ad3acent tre 13 pre8on asfi I3 Poor ffigh.raj fees over utility wires ofd U�y evioua pr f7ie defect a a vt removed. 0 Oregon white 1? 1 fig}t.Aiaj dcf F'oor1 14^,8"and?� n8 at base° n c�°llaw fat 'k Poor noted Weak tc o P cots W RevebUY broken union 14 nigh �ween Wee �`g°n white oak Afajce clef 27 P Afodcran ` T oPP`d for utility 2 nsatn ater °ne.13"SUMS. Tree is ov`n.1'Pcdd Sunday,Fe Poor noted foots tY and one 1/^ doing bruar3?3,/996 /f;gfi.Alejordcf wound byadjac noted ` , ha vs been. yt, �Y"be damage to root °d; unPtc ground n'o fiorst at the bad diameter o fthenk adlact driv a from cO'nPnction ve twa Smell ertrIt ddnrage tom a abO1 Older wound�°t clO'�d;r> Arboreal Fret p`c'�d b `bark of the Uee 4422 Nbtfolk St 1.p'chen -,Certified est Loin OR SA:6°4st 1117 3 636,7833 Pi&2of3 Tree Schedule, Parcel 2, 69th Ave. Tigard Prepared for J.T. Roth Construction Action: Remove Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments 16 Oregon white oak 22 Poor High;Major defects Closed wound at 1.5 feet on west side of trunk. Suckering from base of tree on south noted Indication of root damage. Trees roots are likely to have been severly damaged from the driveway. 17 Douglas-fir 12 Poor High;Major defects Topped for utility. noted 19 willow species 8 Poor High;Major defects Lean. Decay evident. Recent breakage evident. noted 20 unidentified 6 Poor High;Major defects Multiple wounds up and down the stem. Windthrow risk. noted 21[-. 1 Oregon ash 9 Poor High;Major defects Poor form noted 22 Douglas-fir 7 Poor High;Major defects This tree is dying. noted 23 Oregon ash 10 Poor High;Major defects Three stems. 10",10"and 9" Poor form. Previous crown damage. Weak at base. noted 25 Oregon ash 12 Poor High;Major defects West side root anchorage is damaged Old stump well. noted 26 Oregon ash 14 Poor High;Major defects leans to north 13 degrees off vcrticle. vines. noted 27 Oregon ash 12 Poor High;Major defects 2 stems. 12 and 7 inch. very poor form,vines. noted Prepared by Michael R.Reichenbach,Certified Arborist ILO 117 Sunday,February 25, 1996 Arboreal Enterprises,4422 Norfolk St.,West Linn,OR 97068. 503-656-7835 Page 3 of 5 Tree Schedule, Parcel 2, 69th Ave. Tigard Prepared for J.T. Roth Construction Action: Rentove Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments 28 Oregon ash 7 Poor High;Major defects very poor form likely to break noted [...2.2.i Oregon ash 9 Poor High;Major defects narrow crown in relation to stem diant poor taper subject to windthrow noted 3o Douglas-fir 6 Poor High;Major defects Nearly dead noted 31 Oregon ash 8 Poor High;Major defects poor taper,subject to wind throw noted 32 Oregon ash 8 Poor High;Major defects poor taper,subject to wind throw noted 33 Oregon ash 10 Poor High;Major defects poor root anchorage on the west side. poor form noted 13.4....11 Oregon ash 6 Poor High;Major defects lean,poor form noted 1 Oregon ash 8 Poor High;Major defects poor form,poor taper,auject to windthrow noted 36 Oregon ash 6 Poor High;Major defects leaning suppressed tree subject to windthrow noted 39 Oregon ash 8 Poor High;Major defects Poor form,lack of taper,tree leans noted Prepared by Michael R.Reichenbach,Certified Arborist ILO 117 Sunday,February 25,1996 Arboreal Enterprises,4422 Norfolk St.,West Linn,OR 97068. 503-656-7835 Page 4 of 5 Tree Schedule, Parcel 2, 69th Ave. Tigard Prepared for J.T.Roth Construction Action: Remove for construction and mitigate Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments 2 Oregon white oak 28 Fair Low,No major defects vines cover stem,obscutring potential defects noted Grand Total 524 — — -- — — Prepared by Michael R.Reichcnbach,Certified Arborist IL0117 Sunday,February 25,1996 Arboreal Enterprises,4422 Norfolk St.,West Linn,OR 97068. 503-656.7835 Page 5 of 5 ' ^- I ' I O ( I I N E 1'16" E 100.03' _ { MAILBOX 2 0 — - I TT 22 0 39 • 27 O p Zoe z5�°� ° 2 19 18 21 0 Q I .13 J 23 2:11 ___1 1-- a° 32 31 28 — o ce o ®(30 n 34 W ( 33 ." D 35 Z I o z 037 Q \ MAILBOX p 0 1 O ('a GRAVEL DRIVEWAY . • _,-- PARCEL 2 . W -1 12.00' (n ��_i- - AREA 17.991 S.F. / 12.00' 1-- ID 1.1.1 '' 1 HOUSE 0` PARCEL 1 Q D TCHNG AREA 17,992 S.F. ENTRY CT) / 0 l 14 • . :1 , CO CO �. -CO CA CI. ; 9 . ' o2 n 30' . . _ • 30' S 38 8 � 0 3 I- - • WATER p /��' 0 VALVE / • 5 0 — I . 4 I .., O I 1r GG 1` lG.vl �'1I'�,e,I Evtia•rpr,,e_s 2 /25 1 -1CP :%,, o / 6 SCALE DRAWING LOTS 17 THROUGH 22, BLOCK 29 ( WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS (I;, %� to RCPT TO SOUTH I I N.E. 1 l4,SEC. 1,T.2S.,R.1 W.,W.M., V X)<H % �'� ' ' 11 i2 CITY OF TIGARD "..,,,,,)1 7 0 0 _ ;`' ��. _, A WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON • III >: • S 89'57'38" W 100.05' FEBRUARY 5, 1996 Centerline Concepts Inc. • ,I ,V,>(,;<,:„'\ I Y�y N pauY�� t r Y Y Y Y Y l'_`lr'Y1 DRAWN BY: BTA CHECKED BY: JVT `.c 640 82nd Drive Gladstone, Oregon 97027 : ' :.��� % '< ' - SCALE 1"=20' ACCOUNT # 547-08 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 i r A.. ! `#aEft6iT htic: l�i`xs r e. . . ✓k:r '`ic ,ms, „.„44i • •`-'h '.,7 i4,"" ,, _ - — s . Tree Plan Parcel 3, 6g Avenue Prepared for Tim Roth J.T. Roth Construction 12540 SW (38Pkwy, Suite B Tigard. OR 97223-8588 503-639-2639 Prepared by Mike Reichenbach Certified Arborist IL0117 Arboreal Enterprises 4422 Norfolk Street West Linn, Oregon 97068 503-656-7835 April 8, 1996 Tree Plan Parcel 3, J.T. Roth Construction On Saturday, April 6, 1996, I conducted a site visit to inspect trees within 50 feet of the Southerly property boundary of Parcel 3. A map and Tree Schedule for Parcel Three is attached. The purpose of the inspection was to 1) identify trees that need to be removed for a driveway being constructed for Parcels One and Two and 2) to develop protection measures for trees not affected by the driveway construction. The trees have been identified and are shown on the Tree Plan Map prepared by Arboreal Enterprises, dated April 7, 1996. Trees to be removed due to hazard. Trees 6, 7, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, and 22 should be removed due to their hazardous condition. Trees to remove for construction. Trees 1, 2, 3, , 8, 9, 10 and 11 will require removal for the construction of the driveway. Trees to protect Tree protection measures should be taken to protect trees 12, 14, 19, and 20. Specifically, Before construction: 1. Remove trees marked for removal. See the Schedule of Trees in the appendix; • Tree falling, skidding and loading will be done to avoid damage to the remaining trees by falling trees in proposed roadways, driveways, utility corridors, building pads and areas with no trees. Methods that may be used to avoid damage to the remaining trees will include wedges, ropes and removing trees in pieces. 2. Mark boundaries of construction envelopes. The construction envelope includes everything within five feet of the building sites, roadways, paths, utilities and material storage areas as shown on the site plan. • Install tree protection fencing, (3' min. height orange PVC or equivalent) at the perimeter of the construction envelope. All fencing will be installed prior to construction. It will remain in Mike Reichenbach,Arboreal Enterprises Pagel 4422 Norfolk Street West Linn,OR 97068 503-656-7835 04/08/96 Tree Plan Parcel 3, J.T. Roth Construction place for the duration of the project. The placement of the fencing will be inspected by the consulting urban forester/certified arborist or a designated representative. Fencing will be placed to protect as much of the critical root zond of all trees to be protected as possible. • Through written and verbal communication, inform all construction personnel about the need to protect trees and root zones. • Restrict material storage, vehicle and equipment movement, and all other construction activity to areas outside the root zones of trees to be protected; During construction: • The trees most likely to be damaged during construction are located within 10 feet of the construction envelope. Trees within this area may be subject to root injury. During construction the consulting urban forester/certified arborist will inspect all protected trees within 10 feet of the construction envelope. • The consulting urban forester shall monitor construction progress to assure compliance with the tree protection and preservation requirements. • Pruning and cabling may be recommended for those trees that are to be protected. Tree care operations shall be directed, and inspected b4he consulting urban forester/certified arborist. Pruning will be performed by companies employing International Society of Arboriculture, Pacific Northwest Chapter Certified Arboricultural Technicians or ISA Certified Arborists. Pruning of dead limbs only has been recommended for trees 19 and 20. 1A distance equal to one foot from the trunk of the tree for every 1" of DBH. Mike Reichenbach,Arboreal Enterprises Page2 4422 Norfolk Street West Linn,OR 97068 503-656-7835 04,08/95 Tree Plan Parcel 3, J.T. Roth Construction Mitigation Per Tigard's Tree Removal Ordinance 95.19, mitigation will be required for the removal of trees numbered 3, 9, 10 and 11. Tree number 3 is an Oregon white oak 12 inches in diameter. Trees 9, 10 and 11 are Oregon white oaks 17", 14" and 12" in diameter respectively. Conclusion Implementation of this tree plan will protect trees adjacent to construction. Mike Reichenbach,Arboreal Enterprises Page3 4422 Norfolk Street West Linn,OR 97068 503-656-7835 04/08/96 Tree Schedule, Parcel 3, 69th Ave. Tigard Prepared for J.T. Roth Construction Action: Protect Tree# Cotnmoa name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments t Oregon ash 7.6 Good Low;No major defects D noted A td la 1 Oregon White oak 2.1.2 Fair Modcratc defects Braucher into two sew at 12 fuel enrich is u-shaped. bans to the West 15 degrees. O noted Poor Font. Ifthia tree is to be'stained a root creme inspection should be oa niticled m Root anchorage and adequate root area is especially important for this tree D r- ( 19 Douglas-far 22.2 Fair Low;No major defects Pais dead limbs. 314 live crown an one side of tree.Lower half of the East side ofvx m noted lacks limbs or limbs are dead Z 2.immg.ii Douglas-fir 16.8 Far Low;No major defects Anne dead limbs. 3/4 live Gown on one aide oft cc.Lower half of the East aide oftra in noted lacks limbs or lints are dead A A r. Action: Remove due to hazardous condition m m m Tree it Cosmos name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments [j willow species 6.7 Fair High;Major defects This widow has poor format. It is located under the power limes. noted U Oregon white oak 6.1 Poor High;Major defects Suppressed tree.Lacely to die within the next 2 to 5 yeas. m ailed 01 13 Oregon v rise oak 5.7 Dead High;Major defects Remove A CA noted 0+ I11Lli willow species 8.7 Poor High,Major defects Leaning at 45 degrees to the Wont This tree has partially blown over. - noted pp W I 16 i Oregon ash 10.9 Fair High;Major defects Drench attachment at 18 fat is at risk of failure. 01 noted Prepared by Mictaet R.Reiche nbacdr,Gratified Arborist 1L0117 Monday,April 08,1996 Arboreal Enterprises,4422 Norfolk St.,Welt Lint,OR 97068. 503-656-7835 Page l of3 A m r Tree Schedule, Parcel 3, 69th Ave. Tigard Prepared for J.T. Roth Construction Action: Remove due to hazardous condition Treen Common lane Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments 17 Oregon whine oak t 7.5 Poor High;Major defect Measured at 2 fiat from ground,due to hr uch habit Seam is math and south fah noted crotch to the base of the tree. Sears indicate weak union _ m 28 Oregon white oak Y l Fair High;Major defects Two oki branch sockets at base of tree. Decay in so-lids evident_ noted vi Oregon white oar. 5.5 Poor High;Major defects This tree is suppressed and is likely to die within the next 2 to 5 years ti noted 22 Oregon ash 6.5 Poor High;Major defects Poor Form A noted U) m Action; Remove for consincetion Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Consents I Oregon white oak 7.g Fair Moder ate.defects Stump sprout origin,suppressed,loans to the south,Trees 1,2 and 3 may be cable/110 noted reduce risk of Wore. Without tabling these tree should he removed ell al I,2 Oregon white oak 7.7 Fair Moderate,defects Su jptrssed,pump sprout origin,leans to the Northwest,Trees 1,2 std 3 may be cabled W noted to reduce risk((failure. Without(tabling these trees should be removed Oregon white oak 12.3 Fair Moderate;defects Tree leans to the Fist Sump spite origin. Trees 1,2 and 3 may be cabled to relive `n noted risk of failure. Without cabling these toms should he removed. [ 4 - Oregon while oak (4 Fair Moderate;defects Leans to the South. Trees 4 and 5 are one clump. Clumps have a greeter'Attained of noted splitting due to poor root cruel oilmen,between the been If retained these trees Should be pruned arid ra}}haest. to Prepared by Michael R.Rcic hashaclt,Ceetited ArbonstHlil17 Monday,April Oft,1996 Arboreal Enterprises,4422 Norfolk Sty We Linn,OR 9706& 503-656-7835 Page 2at'3 0 tD N • Tree Schedule, Parcel 3, 69th Ave. Tigard Prepared for J.T. Roth Construction Action: Remove for construction Tree# Common name Diameter Condition Hazard Potential Comments 5 Oregon white oak 11.6 Fai Moderate;defects Learns to the North Trees 4 and S sae one clomp. Clumps have a greater'Ashland of noted splitting due to poor root develapmeat between She trees, Wren iced these trees sbouM be pruned and cabled. O m S Douglas-fv 5.9 Fair Low;No major defects This tree has greater ffmn 50%worm and would very likely respond to release. (removal noted of competing trees and vegetation) r 9 Oregon white oak 173 Fair Moderates defects Stump sprout origin Trees 9,10,and 11 are one dump. Trees should be pruned and noted cabled!retained -4 m 10 Oregon white oak 14 Fair Moderate,defects Stump sprout origin. Trees 9,10,and 11 are one dump. Trees should be pruned and noted cabled!retained camil Oregon white oak 12 Fair Moderate;defects Stump sprout orign Trees 9,10,and 11 are one dump. Trees should be pruned and noted tabled!retained m to w m w m u w ct Prepared by Michael R.Rcielxsrbach,Certified Arboriat 1L0117 Monday,April 08,1996 Arboreal Enterprises,4422 Norfolk St.,West Limn,OR 9706& 503-656-7835 Page3of3 m 04 ARBOREAL ENTERPRISES 503 656 7835 P. 09 iklzr � w � N PARCEL 3 ► O17®le 013 X14 j 020 ®11 5 O1q g Tercx . 10 07 ®22 ® 8 85 ib � b 4 t \, PARCEL 3 JT ROTH CokiSTRUCTION TREE MAP ALL LOCA7tok) APP 124Xll∎AA-E PREPARE MIKE 14.E1CNENBACA CE RT'F ta.) A $ 1.∎ T ►L.0 17 AV %L. —1, tizr% -- �e� NiH i ,,, CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: //t q6 STAFF: h1$ ( 4 APPLICANT: rikl OA /'T 04 Coils146NT: Phone:( ) b-79------7 A 3' Phone: 11 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: I Z 5-7 6 5(4) 6.1-91-11 TAX MAPITAX LOT: 14 :.../ __ • 'Os i . , , . . . , ' di A 1 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): 5 H'f �D-eti eloiprt..ru- leevA.e(4) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ezt/4,+0 7f 6 W s t Pi- O ) ZQ ,k)tt lell I r COMPREHENSIVE II / / PLAN DESIGNATION: ' 3 wt,wted�Ia.( Peel PSS)QN d1 C E-- ZONING DESIGNATION: 0 txtiort intr.1 a ( Pv ,Pp��)c&is( ( CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACILITATOR: sue- L_ TEAM AREA: PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minim lot size:4666 sq. f `" Average lot width: 0 ft. Maximum build' g height: `1c ft. Setbacks: front'(A ft. side 14(4 ft. rear JLt ft. corner ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: $5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: W _% (Refer to Code Section 18. `If• 45°) l C t t- JlSiv1 0 14,1.e. - • aar i 4471-- SC+1,ee 11 1" 2 %. CITY OF TIGARD Pm-Application Conference Nobs Page 1 of 8 NOINAsidssdal+1-ic+eurrw.:o ogrinsat Saba Post-It-routing request pad 7664 ROUTING - REQUEST Please �,c ✓ �REAp To w // //,A� / ❑ HANDLE D G !z 6; El APPROVE RV � ) and ' • / rbS,fi� FORWARD c7 [11 RETURN - ■:. �` / •J . a El KEEP OR DISCARD A CM an ❑ REVIEW WITH ME Date I I24/q"Z From � \ A✓ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQ 'EMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 fee unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a parti .e n must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access ease, ent. The depth of all lots shall not excee• 24 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 14 times the minimum lot size of the a• •Iicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots) SPECIAL SETBACKS 14 4 'Z Q/ ➢ Streets: feet from the centerline • ➢ Established areas: k a feet from /'t q ➢ Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's vi/.0 boundary. ➢ Flag lot: 10 foot side yard setback. (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least '/2 (half) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zone district. to Code Section 18.98.020) PARKING AND ACCESS L� Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): I 0 - r • tO J I 0 'tom p aeet o w Required parking for this type of use: I p-Q,C- 3 50 j✓O srkt„2_ Secondary use required parking: p•liY` O ' `d►r a b44 / C'�LUe' I No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and appropriate sign shall be posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NOU-0ui/wtlal appinoaJPlwwq Department Seaton ------ --- — Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: O Ke__ Minimum access width: `SO Minimum pavement width: Li g{•eif-- All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: f/l 1 . Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) _) LOADING AREA REQUIRE TS Every commercial or in stria) building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space ' e and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106. -090) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. Refer to Code Section 18.102) BUFFERING AND SCRE ING In order to increas privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developme ts, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain s e perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas m t be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 11011-Rni eitlal appkationifiaming Oprmrm section k The required buffer widths which 'tire applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. ft. along east boundary. ft. along south boundary. ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along \ . LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design K, features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. j` i (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) `/ SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON Residential application(Planning Department Section • Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100- year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborishall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use ist, filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: ➢ Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; ➢ Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section j 18.150.070.D. r' (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) /- U i€ A) �-4-'102.40 4-'102.40 Q c � rs I s d-� . I , CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 ION Residenvel application!Planning Department Section MITIGATION Wad 6tegP-it a? P115 4/)/002X Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require re•lacement with more an g e tree in afordae epitQh t Q folio in� fQ ogrm.u1: �q 1 ��N 'Yf'�i td ➢ Th punt ni ofi-a ep`- ement tree"gh71/ eke race a rV nsoit alculated to allow growth to maturity. S�Y� wt 41 , .T ri�-st,� laausieu' 1 Sc�wf 1bI a o ✓o raw �I a p+�t S tM In lieu of tree ?eplag rent und1 S se• ion D of t�is secty i, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City f•r its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) NARRATIVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS TO QE k5141-g"k1�� 144R e ArX✓�� / 18.80 18.92 .100 'I 108 18.120 _ 18.150 18.84 _ 18.96 ✓/ 8.102 1 8.114 _ 18.130 18.160 18.88 _ 18.98 ✓ 18.106 v11.116 _ 18.134 18.162 8.164 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be acce•ted. RECYCLING Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6of 8 MON#uMMtial appiabal%ataip O.0•«••t Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: © 5-11/..e.61 Vice Cabo cn --a cc•Q-S S Tam' L.014 VAl 1A 0 A`WU I d rr Gd LA Ldp CU/0 d 10 L1 S S w C ei w � (3 ck 6e j_5 Cy eJ 0 tA v4-4 evh 01,41e-41 t rcuroei, ( Iafô t.t+ oh 1.4. rve-02,1). PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of B NON-Residential application/Planning Department Section The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows II land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard P)LIA [L4 /bk1w4. )'GL1 . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available-from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) is/are required if an application(s) is/are to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: 144,60,4 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 h:\login\patty\masters\preapp-c.mst i ngineering Section: masters\preapp-c.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON Residential application/Planning Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT O�� TIGARD APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: t APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENTS) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ✓ MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies �-� E) Filing Fee $ SPP_ F s�tP,e�` SITE-SPECIFIC MAPS)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ✓ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 20 1 . Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions r�l 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands m� 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND LSE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ac (e) Outdoor common areas �/ (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements / on the site m/ / 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ciV 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes o/ 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation c2 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION I LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Draw' s Indicating: No. of Copies The site developme, ,plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 7C The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . The owner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authorized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet= 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements ❑ 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPU:CkTION✓UST PAGE 3 OF 3 I) Subdivision Preliirt. v Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . Scale equaling 0,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet , ❑ 2. The proposed naie of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map sho ing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, vrletlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST RAGE 4 OF 5 J) Solar Access Calculations: o K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:'iogin\patty\mastersU{id ist.mst May 23,1995 LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 141 . . PUBLIC FACILITIES CITY CITY OF TiGARD The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: OREGON (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decisior making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended b� City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision makinc authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies. City staff and the public have had an oppartunit} to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Cade; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right•af-way dedication for. r_t2�l;QC�.y.g (1.) to feet from centerline. 60 d .per (2.) to feet from centerline. (3.) to feet from centerline. Street imorovements: (1.) '/L street improvements will be necessary along •- un.-0t 4-11t (2.) street improvements will be necessary along (3.) Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of cure and gutters. storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Votes Page 1 of 3 aevdentiat,4ctnrc3ii E.-,rxennq::nartment Sec:;cn In some cases, where street 4vements or other necessary public impri. .rents are not currently practical, the stre improvements may be deferred. in such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the proper: owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formatic of a local improvement district formed to improve: (1.) (2.) Pedestrianwayslbikeways: Sanitary Sewerx The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in $6) 6r3 . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's Water Supply: The ` l Water District - Phone:(503) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your propose: development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill. (503) 526-2502) provides fire protectioi services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequac. of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other agency Permits•. Storm sewer improvements: .a of STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 9043 Surface 'Nate: Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, thi applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility andlor the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,540 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine is a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Votes Page 2 of 3 le:manual.lnpicanmuc.rnneenng:scam tent :ec::on TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990. Washington County adopted a countywide Traffic Impact Fee (T1F) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collect: fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The appiican shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project. and a general use based fe category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building aermit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF ma, be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissibiE only when the T1F is greater than $5,000.00. STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lat. This flow plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: ENGINEER DIVISION PHONE: (503) 6394171 r.,ocynoattytpresuo ms tnq.sectcon,reaop.enq: :emery 11, CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3 lesidential:pcucmornE^qineennq]rsartmem won \ t P(-A.QC I- Lf-1(. III City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Planning Dept. RE: Development Review tax lot 9000 NARRATIVE: It is our desire to construct a commercial office building on property located between SW 69th and SW 68th south of SW Franklin and north of SW Hampton. The purpose for this preliminary review is to discuss general and specific questions relating to the development of the site and it's improvements. I am listing below those questions that have immediately surfaced in these early stages of design and would appreciate a response specific to these and other questions that may arise. 1. The westerly property line fronts un-improved SW 69th. If the property is not accessed from 69th would I be required to perform 1/2 street improvements to 69th? -If improvements are required how extensive would they be? 2. I would desire to make the main entrance to this site coming off SW 68th from an existing access easement, would it create any problems to create the address using SW 68th as the street? 3. is it possible to address A.D.A. requirements applicable to this project at the time of the Pre-app. hearing? -more specifically the requirement of access to second floor. Please review the proposed (attached) site plan relating to this letter. Si l Tint Roth J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Dec 1 16 20:35 P. 01/01 Post-its Fax Note JJ 7671 Date I ®pages To „K • jtn From VNPrte • e - Co./Dept.Tr 4 Co. C"-.4-- I Dec. 17, 1996 - 7 Phone# Phone# yc7_� 17/ City of Tigard Planning Division Fax# #i:51.1 _ - - Fax# Tigard City Hall -X- "f'l ( be- s0.'4"-4: 11 '/l- q i . .17.€/...1-.e./e- 13125 SW Hall Blvd. al J_o L4IQ. L ,e c-' - tee. di 1/w► Tigard, Or. 97223 S ) t tl ✓w�% � 1 ✓ M�e�, Attn: Mr. Mark Roberts L f .4..mil. L 0p e s p . .12,,+/.__ v 4ail RE: SDR 96-0009/Conditions of Approval No. 10 A av< The following is a list of projects being used to mitigate a total of 121 caliper inches of trees being removed from a commercial development located at 12570 SW 69th Ave. Said list is locations and accumulated caliper inches of trees planted within City limits of Tigard since tree mitigation ordinance and have not been used in previous mitigation P td` Location J Type of Tree l Caliper in/ea. 1 Total Cali r in. � P 1. 12455 SW 68th (2) Pagoda Dogwood 2 4 A r --• (5) Chanticlear Pear 1 5 \D , ji(4) Japanese Maple 2 8 OV-- A�{7' (7) Hinoki Cypress 2 14 \� �1"` 2. 12585 SW 68th (3) Pagoda Dogwood 2 6 (10) Chanticlear Pear 2 13 (3) Japanese Maple 2 6 (6)Hinoki Cypress 2 12 3. 8819 SW Waverly Dr. (1) Crimson King Maple 2 2 4. 8845 SW Waverly Dr. (1) Crimson Maple 2 2 5. 8820 SW Waverly Dr. (1) Crimson Maple 2 2 6. 8852 SW Waverly Dr. (1) Crimson Maple 2 2 7. 16648 SW 90th (1) Crimson Maple 2 2 8. 9111 SW Waverly Dr. (1) Crimson M= .le 2 2 The following are . 1 p an • ' this week!! 9. 9005 SW Waverly Dr. (5) Sunset Maple 2 10. 9174 SW Waverly Dr. (5) Sunset Maple 2 10 11. 12600 SW 72nd (11) Sunset Maple // 2 22 _._ / Total accumulated caliper inches planted / 122 Total required to mitigate [121] Balance to be mitigated [1] Respectfully Submitted w� -- V'•2 U l � ' I- y J.T. Roth, Jr. rPe`1` T 1/' S / / J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. 4'vevA '� C✓' t 2/ P , SO w..e_ Y44-5,e ,,,., : „, : ,.,,,,4,.,,t p/ 4 .