Loading...
SDR1996-00008 SDR96 - 00008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK - PHASE II NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0008 34 a►- CITY OF TIGARD DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II Site Development Review SDR 96-0008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested to develop a second phase of an industrial park with a total of 16,800 square feet. The applicant has also proposed to develop a caretaker's residence on the property for security purposes. APPLICANT: Jim and Audrey Castile OWNER: Same 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park (I-P). LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road ; WCTM 2S113B0, TAX LOT 500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE 11 PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. Calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. 2. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. The following Conditions of Approval shall also be addressed. The staff contact for these conditions is Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 3. A. The recommended tree protection measures around all five trees to be preserved shall be constructed. The consulting arborist shall also provide a report concerning the required installation of these protection measures. B. A minimum of two additional parking lot trees shall be provided to comply with the one tree for each seven spaces requirement. C. A minimum of two handicapped parking spaces are required to be provided, one of which must be van accessible. D. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: (The staff contact shall be Mark Roberts, Planning Division (503) 639-4171.) 4. The tree enhancement techniques discussed in the arborist report or other appropriate methods shall be undertaken for a 34-inch Fir tree and a 14-inch Birch tree that is proposed to be preserved. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 2 THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. Z. ECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was previously developed with a detached single-family residence, a barn and a shed. No previous development applications have been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the east, the site property is adjoined by a property under development for an industrial park. This industrial use was approved under Site Development Review 95-0001. To the south, the site is adjoined by a private street that provides access to the Durham Elementary School. To :n e north across SW Durham Road, the property is adjoined by a mixture of sir3le-family detached and multiple-family residential uses. To the west, the property is adjoined by the Unified Sewerage Agency sewage treatment facility. Site Information and Proposal Description: The current existing detached single-family residence, barn, and shed are proposed to be demolished. The property also contains 18 trees. The applicant has proposed to preserve a total of five trees. The applicant proposes to develop four industrial suite buildings and related site improvements. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build light manufacturing uses and related buiing construction services. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Manufacture of Finished Products, Construction Sales and Service. Section 18.68.030 lists both types of uses as permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. The applicant has also proposed to develop an 800 square foot apartment opposite the main entrance to the development for caretaker purposes. The Planned Industrial Zoning District permits a manufactured home for this purpose. Because the dwelling is intended to be used specifically for this purpose and is part of a manufactured building, this use is in compliance with the permitted uses of the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.68 states that there is no minimum lot width requirement in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Developments within the Planned Industrial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping. The applicant has complied with this standard by proposing to landscape over 25% of the site. NOT ;c OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 3 Setbacks: Section 18.68.030 states that a front yard setback of 35 feet shall be provided. Section 18.98 also states that no structures shall be developed within 30 feet of the centerline of SW Durham Road. No other setback standards apply other than Clear Vision and Landscape Screening that are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Planned Industrial Zoning District also limits building height to a maximum building height of 45 feet. The applicant has provided a front yard setback of 35 feet in compliance with this requirement. The maximum height of the proposed structures is 24 feet and is also in compliance with the development standards of this zoning district. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. These chapters are also listed as approval standards for a Planned Development Review application under Section 18.80.120.2. The proposals consistency with these sections is reviewed elsewhere within this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These requirements are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The applicant has addressed this requirement through an arborist report for the site. The preservation and/or replacement requirements are addressed elsewhere within this staff report. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has addressed this requirement NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 4 by proposing to locate one of the buildings along the length of the property frontage on SW Durham Road that adjoins areas to be developed with the aforementioned uses. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department has reviewed this plan and found these issues to have been sufficiently addressed as proposed. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification or the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has proposed to plant five Red Sunset Maples at 20 feet on, ;enter. Due to their large size at maturity, these trees satisfy the street tree requirements for this site. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equzAy distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed building to be developed along the SW Durham Road frontage effectively screens the parking lot from view. The landscaping as proposed addresses the aforementioned functional issues except for the parking lot trees. The Landscape Plan proposes three new parking lot trees and to preserve one existing tree to provide parking lot shading throughout the site. Because a total of 39 parking spaces is proposed, a minimum of two additional parking lot trees shall be provided to comply with the one tree for each seven spaces requirement. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight t8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The plan as proposed does not put vision obscuring structures or plantings within the intersection at SW Durham Road and the main driveway entrance. The applicant has also not proposed these types of structures at the intersection of driveways within the site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 5 Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.Minimum Off Street Parking Requirements states that a minimum of one (1) parking space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for Contractor's Office use and that a minimum of one space for each employee on the largest shift shall be provided for a light industrial use. The applicant has proposed to provide 39 parking spaces, with four of these spaces to be developed as compact spaces. Based on the total building square footage that is proposed, this number is expected to be sufficient where Contractor Services or other similar types of permitted service uses are the principal user of the property rather than primarily light industrial manufacturing uses. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires a minimum of two of disabled parking spaces if 25 to 50 parking spaces are provided. One of these spaces is also required to be designed to be van accessible. The proposed design of the site and landscape plans conflict on this requirement. The site plan provides two handicapped parking spaces, the landscape plan provides three spaces. A minimum of two spaces is required to be provided, one of which must be van accessible. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The applicant has proposed two bicycle racks between Buildings C and D in compliance with this standard. Off-Street Loading spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. Each of the proposed suites have been proposed to be provided with a roll up door for loading purposes in compliance with this requirement. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial use that requires more than 100 parking spaces provide two (2) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The 30-foot width of the existing driveway complies with this requirement. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials is used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 6 standards. The applicant has proposed a separated walkway system along the entrance to each building that provides direct access to SW Durham Road. This system complies with all the aforementioned functional and design requirements. Peking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110(B) states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessa _ to provide parking area connections. The applicant has proposed to connect with the parking lot on the adjoining industrial site. The previous site was required to enter into a joint access and maintenance agreement. The property owner shall again enter into a joint maintenance agreement. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functions' and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following fcur (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant provided an arborist report indicating that a total of 18 trees exists on the site in excess of 12 inches in diameter. Of these 18 trees, five are considered to be presently in poor condition. The applicant has proposed to remove three of the trees that are presently in poor condition. Due to their condition, no mitigation is required for these trees. Because of their location, the other two trees that are in poor condition are proposed to be preserved. Several arboricultural techniques are proposed to improve the condition of these two trees. These techniques or other appropriate methods shall be undertaken prior to the issuance of Occupancy Permits for this development. The applicant has also proposed to remove 10 of the 13 healthy trees on site or 76% of the healthy trees. This requires 100% mitigation of the caliper inches that are lost. A total of 259 caliper inches is proposed to be removed through this development. The applicant has proposed to plant 135, 2-inch caliper arborvitae trees, or 270 caliper inches of new trees, as mitigu:ion for the loss of trees. The recommended tree protection measures around all five trees to be preserved shall be constructed prior to issuance of Building Permits. The NOT1C.. 'F DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 7 consulting arborist shall provide a report concerning the required installation of these protection measures. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. The applicant has not requested signage for this property at this time. The applicant may apply for signage at a later date. Any such application will be reviewed for compliance with signage restriction for properties within this zoning district. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) and Grading/Erosion Control shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site is adjacent to SW Durham Road that is classified as an arterial street between SW Hail Boulevard and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. ODOT and Washington County are currently constructing full street improvements in Durham Road between Hall and Upper Boones Ferry. As a part of Phase 1 of Durham Industrial Park, the applicant was required to obtain an access permit from ODOT and construct a joint driveway that would serve both phases. The applicant's site plan indicates that the joint driveway will be utilized. A joint use and maintenance agreement was executed by the applicant at that time for the joint driveway. Since all right-of-way has been obtained to complete the ODOT/County project, no additional dedications are required. SANITARY SEWER: A private sanitary sewer line was provided to this site during Phase 1. The plan shows that the private line will also serve Phase 2. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site will be directed to the south where it will enter a "buried pipe trench". This system is similar to what was constructed in Phase 1. The trench will provide for water quality and will overflow into an existing storm pipe south of this site that is within an access roadway for Durham School. Phase 1 also overflows into this off-site line. The applicant should be required to investigate the capacity of the off-site line to determine if the additional storm water from Phase 2 will unduly impact downstream properties. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 8 addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated above, the applicant will use a buried pipe trench for a water quality facility. There were no calculations provided to Staff with this application, therefore it is not certain that the facility is adequately sized. However, this phase is similar in size to Phase 1, and the facility proposed is similar to what was built in Phase 1. Therefore, Staff is comfortable with the proposed water quality facility. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, a ,d any other activity that accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police, Water and Building Departments have reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and stated that the applicant shall submit fire flow calculations, fire hydrant locations, and turn around details for the dead-end driveway access system for review and approval. SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 9 Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JULY 1, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JULY 1, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 11/Zazik June 21. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner ��, c • C, "f`""' uAj June 21, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager 1.1CURPLMPATTY\S DRC-DE C.DOT NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 10 SW Durham Road I--+- 'u ..;.;____,_ •_ __ ,4,..ar, , -- 1 "��_n Vr[_ • •_\\ \ , \ 1 I , ig ill . A IIIIllllllhIL1ILLIIIlih1IL� g or- \IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINb�J 1 �- 4 , s :4 -�-�a I �; W i I 1: ••••33'. 3•.r►II'-C • . CI . 1� :4 •....>M!t♦ •2•. ?r.�• i j CV=�, 1 a-S --••• �y z z�� i ••-1— 1 \ . • \ f= ---- _ �_� I ' i�\ V r---- i �0 { �' - I. ( � _ 4 _� 3 I. �� -- a Cis 44 ..:awl .... 1 4 • CC • -__:•° a SS 5 •� _ , Y•r 0, ( i= i' 0 0 •� ; 3•••ir.n••#• +-r 000 I• �� e � _ e MB= ► — II IIh-=U "= iil.:∎i LL mtp*.1 NN_ , ,,, .O-r rir•rr •C-C 4 20-C 0 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP SDR96-0008 Castile Industrial Park (Phase 2) Q.fRI. Q I 1 6 Pill am=• i \ . klinil rid111. ji/m lull wr. 1.1 1 i ST ��_ , }� '17. I I e c Ik 1 1 1111111 +JU , // - la '-- I BA" uu - Et 2• ill riling ,' ■// Ai _ .. 111 m■■fl■/■r a CI my a .- 1 - ■„,. Am 0 man union ow. +,�Ti %Inr sa 0) �, k' C I, :Wow . ) • ... 111111 kil-Aull., .. A 11111 — C m11111 - mai limn I I l 1 , Cl IN w1i F 1 _ 1 1 CL ■ ir I -a s_ SUBJECT II ARCEL---> > CD ti�f ,i / • o U I Vicinity Map A SDR 96-0008 Note: Map is not to scale Durham Industrial Pk. (Phase LE) N REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: June 20, 1996 TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 96-0008 Durham Industrial Park Phase 2 Description: The applicant requests approval to develop Phase 2 of an industrial park located at 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 12CC, Tax Lot 500). Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road which is classified as an arterial street between SW Hall Boulevard and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. ODOT and Washington County are currently constructing full street improvements in Durham Road between Hall and Upper Boones Ferry. As a part of Phase 1 of Durham Industrial Park, the applicant was required to obtain an access permit from ODOT and construct a joint driveway that would serve both phases. The applicant's site plan indicates that the joint driveway will be utilized. A joint use and maintenance agreement was executed by the applicant at that time for the joint driveway. Since all right-of-way has been obtained to complete the ODOT/County project, no additional dedications are required. 2. Sanitary Sewer: A private sanitary sewer line was provided to this site during Phase 1. The plan shows that the private line will also serve Phase 2. 3. Storm Drainage: Storm water from this site will be directed to the south where it will enter a "buried pipe trench". This system is similar to what was constructed in Phase 1. The trench will provide for water quality and will overflow into an existing storm pipe south of this site that is within an access roadway for ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0008 Durham Industrial Park PAGE 1 Durham School. Phase 1 also overflows into this off-site line. The applicant should be required to investigate the capacity of the off-site line to determine if the additional storm water from Phase 2 will unduly impact downstream properties. 4. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated above, the applicant will use a buried pipe trench for a water quality facility. There were no calculations provided to Staff with this application, therefore it is not certain that the facility is adequately sized. However, this phase is similar in size to Phase 1, and the facility proposed is similar to what was built in Phase 1. Therefore, Staff is comfortable with the proposed water quality facility. 5. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91- 47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0008 Durham Industrial Park PAGE 2 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. Calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval. 2. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. APPROVED: ZAll Boo; Greg Berry, Acting City Engineer i:\engthrianr\sdr96-08.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0008 Durham Industrial Park PAGE 3 05.17-96 13: 24 $503 526 2538 TV FIRE MARSHAL 0 003.005 RECEIVED PLANNING • I!f� MAY 2 c ig� ,��L�'. I CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: May 8. 1 .96 TO: Tualatia Valleyike & Rescue MAY 1 5 1996 FIFIc rv�,�i�i iA•; uFFIGE FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mask Roberts_(x_31 ) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 96-0008 ➢ DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK (PHASE II) < The applicant is requesting to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 12CC, Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (I-P). The I-P zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -1VIay 20. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY; We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter Written comments provided below. f '✓� ti�h' 1 1 [) R-'1" OS"PO y-. (.� 1,cI ( " V lA �1 p•S� 4., l < <�<�, `j-" v r�� �-✓_5 -,Z .,sue f (4- 0-- -mss 5 S / P rasrproLle the Wowing infcrmation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Zi S �� c �- �, Phone Number(s): _ -L S-0 SDR 96-CCOB DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE II) PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 441 RECEIVED P[ANNINGCITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: May 8, 1996 MAY 1 1996 TO: David Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0008 ➢ DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK (PHASE II) Q The applicant is requesting to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 12CC, Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (l-P). The I-P zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - May 20, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Wins(prooidc Ott followin9information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 0/1-17-- Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE II) PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECE(VED PIANNIN( DATE: May 8, 1996 MAY 13 1996 TO: Michael Miller, Operations Water Dept. Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 96-0008 ➢ DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK (PHASE II) < The applicant is requesting to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 12CC, Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (I-P). The I-P zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - May 20, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: X, We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: l lease provide the following tnformationl Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s):x 45g5 SDR 96-0008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE II) PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ''EIVED PLANNING MAY 0 91996 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: May 8, 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 96-0008 ➢ DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK (PHASE II) The applicant is requesting to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 12CC, Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (I-P). The I-P zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - May 20, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: !Please provide thr following informaGnnl Name of Person(s) Commentin.; ,<;777/-1)-7 Phone Number(s): r� • j SDR 96-0008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE H) PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 44, CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: May 8, 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 96-0008 ➢ DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK (PHASE II) The applicant is requesting to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 12CC, Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (I-P). The I-P zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - May 20, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date. please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Imam prouidetlufollowinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE II) PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS I 1.�.QUEST FOR COMMA_..4 0Q Gu - ood 5 NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS GIl Is6—i-11(11d /hr�/ / CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS r 1.r k 6wiez4_74 {circle one) _CIT Area: LW) (S) p (C) ® Placed for review in Library CIT Book 69 CITY DEPARTMUITS LZ-BLDG.DEPT./David Scott,w+a.w«r PQUCE DEPT./Kelley Jennings,G..xR<veht.«,Office( _OPERATIONS/John Acker,Mot sp.. _CITY ADMIN./Cathy Wheatley,cityPeca,on ( I/G.DEPT./Brian Roger,Devebp,nent Renew Enp.rea _COM.DEV.DEPT./D.S.T'S _ADV.PLNG./Nadine Smith, Pwt.,.p s.,.. 1.411VATER DEPT./Michael Miller,opnptian rop ropc at.0 tw+ao= SPECIAL DISTRICTS i V FIRE MARSHALL "UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa.County Fire District 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro,OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA.CO.DEPT.OF LAND USE&TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N.First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#16,Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland,OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) _STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi 1.--''ODOT/REGION 1 _Mike Borreson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Trans.Planning _Cott King(CPA's) Portland.OR 97225-0412 123 N.W.Flanders ■ I Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) — PortJpr+d.OR 97209-4037 _Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) OREGON DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) L// 1 175 Court Street.N.E. _ODOT/REGION 1,DISTRICT 2-A 1 _CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem,OR 97310-0590 Bob Schmidt/Engineering Coord. Larry Conrad,Senior Planner 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412 PO Box 4755 _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97225 Beaverton,OR 97076 Planning Director 1 120 SW 5th _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland,OR 97204 City Manager I Mike Matteucci.Neighborhood Coordinator PO Box 369 PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Beaverton,OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _CITY OF KING CITY _CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard,OR 97281-3483 City Manager PO Box 369 15300 SW 116th Tualatin,OR 97062 —OTHER King City,OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES _GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. i Elaine Self,Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 _NW NATURAL GAS CO. Peons:(503)nt-244. _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS " TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer roe:EKE 721-2502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox,Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M.Forney,PLS-Project Eng. 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave.,Room 324 Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Union Station Portland,OR 97209 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _AERONAUTICS DIVISION(ODOT) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _US POSTAL SERVICE _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H.PARK _FISH t WILDLIFE Randy Hammock,Growth Cord. _PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland,OR 97229-9998 _OTHER _U.S.ARMY CORPS.OF ENGINEERS 1 h\EoOn\Patty\.oslnf\fCnohc.ohl 1 A' . .41,1. '!_• City of Tigard,Oregmm . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (a.ca.o■above.W applicable) (check appnxxiate box("elow) (Enter Public Meanng Date above) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council n That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Cheek boa Wove,r apprcabbe) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: {Chock boa above,V applicable} (cneck appropnate box below) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: 1 A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each n e person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached t(s), marked Exhib' "B" • the Ll-5 day .� , � r% 199/,-' and deposited in the United States Mail on t c „ If dO of _e. i 199 , postage prepaid. 2A-12):1,@ f ' Pik,*•I Pr ared Notice b i Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of _ .L.,'i., , 1'a _-='+' �'!'g RKS Tv` ` � /;.� GON 111 SION SEPTEMBER NOTARY PUBLIC •F 0"EGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 My Commission - _•• -s: `FILE INF �_ n ��_��r �L NAME(S): �GG1" c _how'�l-iaX- Y�1 CASE NO(S): 57*a&--000? TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: "!rr •.4 L.: NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0008 FAL •��� CITY OF TIGARD DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II Site Development Review SDR 96-0008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested to develop a second phase of an industrial park with a total of 16,800 square feet. The applicant has also proposed to develop a caretaker's residence on the property for security purposes. APPLICANT: Jim and Audrey Castile OWNER: Same 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park (I-P). LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road ; WCTM 2S113B0, TAX LOT 500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. Calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. 2. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. The following Conditions of Approval shall also be addressed. The staff contact for these conditions is Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 3. A. The recommended tree protection measures around all five trees to be preserved shall be constructed. The consulting arborist shall also provide a report concerning the required installation of these protection measures. B. A minimum of two additional parking lot trees shall be provided to comply with the one tree for each seven spaces requirement. C. A minimum of two handicapped parking spaces are required to be provided, one of which must be van accessible. D. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: (The staff contact shall be Mark Roberts, Planning Division (503) 639-4171.) 4. The tree enhancement techniques discussed in the arborist report or other appropriate methods shall be undertaken for a 34-inch Fir tree and a 14-inch Birch tree that is proposed to be preserved. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 2 THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was previously developed with a detached single-family residence, a barn and a shed. No previous development applications have been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the east, the site property is adjoined by a property under development for an industrial park. This industrial use was approved under Site Development Review 95-0001. To the south, the site is adjoined by a private street that provides access to the Durham Elementary School. To the north across SW Durham Road, the property is adjoined by a mixture of single-family detached and multiple-family residential uses. To the west, the property is adjoined by the Unified Sewerage Agency sewage treatment facility. Site Information and Proposal Description: The current existing detached single-family residence, barn, and shed are proposed to be demolished. The property also contains 18 trees. The applicant has proposed to preserve a total of five trees. The applicant proposes to develop four industrial suite buildings and related site improvements. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build light manufacturing uses and related building construction services. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Manufacture of Finished Products, Construction Sales and Service. Section 18.68.030 lists both types of uses as permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. The applicant has also proposed to develop an 800 square foot apartment opposite the main entrance to the development for caretaker purposes. The Planned Industrial Zoning District permits a manufactured home for this purpose. Because the dwelling is intended to be used specifically for this purpose and is part of a manufactured building, this use is in compliance with the permitted uses of the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.68 states that there is no minimum lot width requirement in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. Developments within the Planned Industrial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping. The applicant has complied with this standard by proposing to landscape over 25% of the site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 3 • Setbacks: Section 18.68.030 states that a front yard setback of 35 feet shall be provided. Section 18.98 also states that no structures shall be developed within 30 feet of the centerline of SW Durham Road. No other setback standards apply other than Clear Vision and Landscape Screening that are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Planned Industrial Zoning District also limits building height to a maximum building height of 45 feet. The applicant has provided a front yard setback of 35 feet in compliance with this requirement. The maximum height of the proposed structures is 24 feet and is also in compliance with the development standards of this zoning district. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. These chapters are also listed as approval standards for a Planned Development Review application under Section 18.80.120.2. The proposals consistency with these sections is reviewed elsewhere within this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These requirements are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The applicant has addressed this requirement through an arborist report for the site. The preservation and/or replacement requirements are addressed elsewhere within this staff report. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has addressed this requirement NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 4 by proposing to locate one of the buildings along the length of the property frontage on SW • Durham Road that adjoins areas to be developed with the aforementioned uses. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department has reviewed this plan and found these issues to have been sufficiently addressed as proposed. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has proposed to plant five Red Sunset Maples at 20 feet on center. Due to their large size at maturity, these trees satisfy the street tree requirements for this site. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed building to be developed along the SW Durham Road frontage effectively screens the parking lot from view. The landscaping as proposed addresses the aforementioned functional issues except for the parking lot trees. The Landscape Plan proposes three new parking lot trees and to preserve one existing tree to provide parking lot shading throughout the site. Because a total of 39 parking spaces is proposed, a minimum of two additional parking lot trees shall be provided to comply with the one tree for each seven spaces requirement. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The plan as proposed does not put vision obscuring structures or plantings within the intersection at SW Durham Road and the main driveway entrance. The applicant has also not proposed these types of structures at the intersection of driveways within the site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 5 Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.Minimum Off Street Parking Requirements states that a minimum of one (1) parking space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for Contractor's Office use and that a minimum of one space for each employee on the largest shift shall be provided for a light industrial use. The applicant has proposed to provide 39 parking spaces, with four of these spaces to be developed as compact spaces. Based on the total building square footage that is proposed, this number is expected to be sufficient where Contractor Services or other similar types of permitted service uses are the principal user of the property rather than primarily light industrial manufacturing uses. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires a minimum of two of disabled parking spaces if 25 to 50 parking spaces are provided. One of these spaces is also required to be designed to be van accessible. The proposed design of the site and landscape plans conflict on this requirement. The site plan provides two handicapped parking spaces, the landscape plan provides three spaces. A minimum of two spaces is required to be provided, one of which must be van accessible. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The applicant has proposed two bicycle racks between Buildings C and D in compliance with this standard. Off-Street Loading spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. Each of the proposed suites have been proposed to be provided with a roll up door for loading purposes in compliance with this requirement. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial use that requires more than 100 parking spaces provide two (2) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The 30-foot width of the existing driveway complies with this requirement. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials is used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 6 standards. The applicant has proposed a separated walkway system along the entrance to each building that provides direct access to SW Durham Road. This system complies with all the aforementioned functional and design requirements. Parking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110(B) states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The applicant has proposed to connect with the parking lot on the adjoining industrial site. The previous site was required to enter into a joint access and maintenance agreement. The property owner shall again enter into a joint maintenance agreement. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant provided an arborist report indicating that a total of 18 trees exists on the site in excess of 12 inches in diameter. Of these 18 trees, five are considered to be presently in poor condition. The applicant has proposed to remove three of the trees that are presently in poor condition. Due to their condition, no mitigation is required for these trees. Because of their location, the other two trees that are in poor condition are proposed to be preserved. Several arboricultural techniques are proposed to improve the condition of these two trees. These techniques or other appropriate methods shall be undertaken prior to the issuance of Occupancy Permits for this development. The applicant has also proposed to remove 10 of the 13 healthy trees on site or 76% of the healthy trees. This requires 100% mitigation of the caliper inches that are lost. A total of 259 caliper inches is proposed to be removed through this development. The applicant has proposed to plant 135, 2-inch caliper arborvitae trees, or 270 caliper inches of new trees, as mitigation for the loss of trees. The recommended tree protection measures around all five trees to be preserved shall be constructed prior to issuance of Building Permits. The NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 7 consulting arborist shall provide a report concerning the required installation of these protection measures. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. The applicant has not requested signage for this property at this time. The applicant may apply for signage at a later date. Any such application will be reviewed for compliance with signage restriction for properties within this zoning district. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) and Grading/Erosion Control shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site is adjacent to SW Durham Road that is classified as an arterial street between SW Hall Boulevard and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. ODOT and Washington County are currently constructing full street improvements in Durham Road between Hall and Upper Boones Ferry. As a part of Phase 1 of Durham Industrial Park, the applicant was required to obtain an access permit from ODOT and construct a joint driveway that would serve both phases. The applicant's site plan indicates that the joint driveway will be utilized. A joint use and maintenance agreement was executed by the applicant at that time for the joint driveway. Since all right-of-way has been obtained to complete the ODOT/County project, no additional dedications are required. SANITARY SEWER: A private sanitary sewer line was provided to this site during Phase 1. The plan shows that the private line will also serve Phase 2. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site will be directed to the south where it will enter a "buried pipe trench". This system is similar to what was constructed in Phase 1 . The trench will provide for water quality and will overflow into an existing storm pipe south of this site that is within an access roadway for Durham School. Phase 1 also overflows into this off-site line. The applicant should be required to investigate the capacity of the off-site line to determine if the additional storm water from Phase 2 will unduly impact downstream properties. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 8 addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated above, the applicant will use a buried pipe trench for a water quality facility. There were no calculations provided to Staff with this application, therefore it is not certain that the facility is adequately sized. However, this phase is similar in size to Phase 1, and the facility proposed is similar to what was built in Phase 1. Therefore, Staff is comfortable with the proposed water quality facility. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity that accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police, Water and Building Departments have reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and stated that the applicant shall submit fire flow calculations, fire hydrant locations, and turn around details for the dead-end driveway access system for review and approval. SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 9 Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JULY 1, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JULY 1, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 1`}Aet June 21, 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner . June 21 , 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff ' DATE Planning Manager I.\CURPLMPATT ASDRC-DEC.DOT NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0008-DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK/PHASE II PAGE 10 • • S SW Durham Road 4 ..c, • ,.. - I------- '''11"91EICIEV-='12e2G11:- IIIP. -4........, .... .._ ......... ..... __ , ........../.. .... • i(--- — • 4 i i.:', 47'; r>.g il Op I. II NM t.91.1\, NO "' NZ q LI n i-' 1 !„. • E. \N. \ le.- -. \v. en:. ■••■•,.. mm• .,\'' 4 11 111111111111121111111111 1 “ 8 I 1 it rif- 4; it i \ilmoiminiummiti .-, i.I 1 Imim. ■•4/< ,„,,, N.mezdrczwz,on 1..Num I s_..6 I I \ CL IR-0 . $:, 1... I. 1,V!! C C C C ILLI :4 '' --- I • CD : I..• il re i, I.. • • 6. I SI. . ._ I ft ... . 'iii■ ammo,WI MINIM‘'It ••••■Mr■\ IIPP1 s, (.5 ==,......;,... %„ ro 0 =.....= 6 ____:0` N\ r:} P i Z ........MINIM I !i _a t a\\‘‘\\\`' 1---- .............. .sommo 2 11=t=swum 1 . 16 . kil , : P. ,,,<\,:\„ Fl.j__-_ IQ ir ====: ■ 1,4 2 ct, — =:,,,__- li, . . .1_____ Osi • r ..........3 \ \ \ . -. \ ..,p 0 ■ t_.•A I ;1 ' ElliE in 'a fii 4. r-u .. I t ••••01 i d I Imo am a .s,, \ r i.......,... 1 i; . - , t--- i 9 0.. ,INIIIMIIM 1••■%, • . ■\.‘:'X, I r---- YIS it 1........ :=N ; .? S 11 i: 141,. — '‘' ‘I j--- n 3 - ia i_ is . , ':‘‘ \ 1---_ 2ir-to 1 te.-o- ' ' ! %.==‘!. _ \ ,,, __ —I,. kw I I • • k el ' ......... __.... ,ilim-...... .. _________, 11.■Ili' •••Tealiii 410.1••••• 4 li< I t4 I il r 9 r 6 .p , ,..,. , , „ , 041■••11'.4f•I" -Ce i 1 4..° 14 (.5 4 I twiriii, 1.1 18 1 Itil 1 1 1 ......... ,. _.._., ••\\11•1•1111111•11•1111111\N.\\'AIN OM ,, ---ift 011111 11111111.1111119H I :I I 1; %NOM MI A %mom=■ Ew;'-zr, 4 --.—.quilizo g :;:,. ; - 1-1 U.. 0 mu. ,1" , 1.- 1\ IL ,\ \ ---1 te --...iit >8 / •-.._ _,...e --... i _ 2' -. 40.0' 20'.0• 1111". 2111f2I,... Immi .----# 1 : PLOT PLAN A CASE NO. I SDR 96-0008 EXHIBIT MAP 11 Castile Industrial Park (Phase 2) u :••. C Q .. VIM Will 1' T • i. rir■ Illrll ■■■■ � ow - 1111111111M 1 sow. -IL s. } h. Idols R ST I ■a■►j,4 ' EIRE lirW .0 li ,1 111 ( 1 1 , /ovAr111 l d /AMP! I -.. gm ii. ■�/�'�I :: an am 111 E■■1■■■■ro fe CV !tii " ' tt4 UIT T 11 litille X411 • �� rm. X111111 - 1111111 ∎ ., Birria 1111111 ---1 C 11111 1 ��l =' 11111 _J i II1 CO 1 • ) 07 !mg 6. C1l1RHAM RI') RI/ -0 LMM SUBJECT -;, (o c3) PARCE L---> > •�• ,, „,' IN p O 0 ;; ...... ,,,...,,,, .‘4?• r. U 11111 1 I Vicinity Map A SDR 96-0008 Note: Map is not to scale Durham Industrial Pk. (Phase II) N -'LAtrhXYY1Trirl, 45cEL-5Dk clif • EXI�I; 2S112CC-01800 2S112CC-01801 BENJAMIN, JUDITH A BOWEN, RICHARD L AND TERESA 15965 SW 81ST CT PO BOX 94 TIGARD,OR 97224 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 113B0-00500 2S 113B0-00400 CASTILE. JAMES W&AUDREY CASTILE,JAMES W&A UDREY 7800 SW PETERS RD 7800 W P S D DURHAM,OR 97224 D1� AM,OR 97224 2S112CC-01900 2S112CC-01804 COTTER, EDWARD E&VIOLA C ELLIOTT, DAVID C AND PAMELA S 8065 SW DURHAM RD 15987 SW 81ST CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CC-02000 2S112CC-06200 GOBLE, MARION MARLIN JENSEN-JUNGWIRTH, CAROL 8025 SW DURHAM RD JUNGWIRTH, RONALD L TIGARD,OR 97223 7733 SW 50TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S112CC-06100 2S112DC-01400 KENNEDY, REESE C& LOY CLARK PIPELINE CO, INC RUTH U TRUSTEES 3905 SW 141ST 15943 SW 81ST CT BEAVERTON,OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CC-05900 2S112CC-01700 NEWBERRY, MICHAEL H REED,WILLIAM C& 15954 SW 81ST CT LUNDBERG, LYDIA--- TIGARD,OR 97224 103 -TER P 55 TLAND,OR 97225 2S112CC-01701 2S112CC-05800 REED,WILLIAM C& ROGERS,CYNTHIA R LUNDBERG, LYDIA 15932 SW 81ST CT 10355 SW PORTER TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S112CC-06000 2S113B0-00300 SAYLER, DEBORAH A SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY#442 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97123 2S113B0-00600 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY JAMES & AUDREY CASTILE 150 N 1ST AVE 8100 SW DURHAM ROAD HILLSBORO,OR 97123 TIGARD OR 97224 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 t' Notice TT 8 5 4 5 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 r , ., Legal Notice Advertising /-Y96 'ITY OF TIGARI: • • ❑ Tearsheet Notice City of Tigard el_3125 SW Hall Blvd. • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Tigard ,Oregon 97223-8199 • • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)96-0008 Accounts Payable :Terry >DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE II)< The Director has approved, subject to conditions,a request to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 S.W. Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 13B0,Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (I-P).The I-P STATE OF OREGON, ) zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, I, Kathy Snyder 18.116. 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising iuj Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard-Tual at in Times i/I� - - - a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 --- - - and 193.020; published at Tigard - in the ■ 1, 4 II ``� - n rn aforesaid county and state; that the Iu1 1 II 1110 ' C -• Durham Industrial Park (Ph_ TT ) I� l �e gR I 1 kt %�� �� S1: C: i1Ut1111P a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the 11 ri d`, Zil :a ..0 In ,F entire issue of said newspaper for__ -ONE successive and 11� 1I"■ �� -■ II L Li 111111111111* — � l consecutive in the following issues: 11., 11111.1111111 01 /�L Daum - , 111111Ilfte `7 June 20, 1996 ���I wars ! X111 ii'i� i_ ...511! 1111 Illiji _%11 11 jj== .III1111 Is' AA i1il � = II 11111111 1 1111 ,..irl 42,A.... ■ 11.x,__ /!1 - Subscribed and sworn to4 ore me this I . is - • •e, 1 I sue,ecr PA CUL-» •6.,,>. 6 , Ilf - Notary lic for Oregon ' ,› My Commission Expires: r _ ____. 410, AFFIDAVIT I p J ,_I The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department.Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on July 1: 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance %TA Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,July 1, 1996. TT8545-Publish June 20, 1996. FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 14, 1996 TO: Mary White, Legals (fax)624-0338 FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard (Ph.)639-4171 PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN THE LEGALS SECTION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK (PHASE II) The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 13B0, Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (I-P). The I-P zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.18.150 and 18.164. (PLACE VICINITY MAP HERE) The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on July 1, 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM July 1, 1996. TT PUBLISH DATE: June 20, 1996 SDR 96-0008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE II) PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS F I I I J l 1 J _, ` �� a , iii onmgwp!!i4 111111111111 E a% 2 111111,2 It ►. ta R Air/_ _ ow lc COM MIA� jA X111111 __ il Whim. 0.471 11111;.Atibi VI X1111111111 �I�� m , !iUI � :111111 .� j _ 2 , � 1 1111.. �.�y 1 O.'' i - .' 2S113�0�4�� 00 .. ~ iIIiIIIiIiii ....' :: i _____ S113B0-0031' ,E7 am ..: f c i co it 2S113B0-00600 '73 ff k 111111//� � . �1�1111111 .... mom �-'.t„ ar iitd- r U -■- *___, cyc 1 i t-T-1 0 1 t 2 Vicinity Map ' Notification Map ran N.,,.io�l N SDR 96-0008 APPLICANT MATERIALS • I - w 44 � .; CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO.- C' S' OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. (-96o- C--F L7( APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: -7 T--7c"C3 (- 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Appli59,tion elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION a I1 D S.W, tj U 12.14 A.14 ✓(A) Application form (1) B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. '2.5 1 12 C,L authorization SOD I ✓(C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 1 . 3 AC_22-ES t.i/4 (D) Assessor' s map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* JIM AUpi2.. GASTII�!✓ Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS 8 I b U 5.4. PUP-HAM PHONE (0361- 13C S plicant' s statement CITY rl LI/412-U O {Z ZIP 912_2.4- (pre—app checklist) APPLICANT* dim 4- AU DM"( c_A-S r1L LyG (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS sAr1E A' AP.5OVE PHONE JJJJ addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY ZIP (H) Filing fee (t ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DI' ER I D TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 5 "7 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this `//// 9 / application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY L� c,� 1 aic,414-VI /i-4u 4/ The owners of record of the subject property �//��/ request site development review approval to N..P.0: Number: 50 wTL1 allow 17eN/ LOPMENT 2- Approval Date: OP. AN 1NPUST1 -'M Final Approval Date: Planning GO 1-4T14 C-1" Pe IZ-SO N' J LM AK 012-M04 e. t-Ltuxd EtyGlhte-e-EAK&► Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 I M - 4/111 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 26 day of M Cut-t 19 9Ce SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. — -ce2 "let / (KSL:pm/0524P) • 1' A'NSIV CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0008 FILE TITLE: DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK (PHASE II) APPLICANT: Jim &Audrey Castile OWNER: Same 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 639-1395 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to develop Phase II of an Industrial Park. A total of 16,800 square feet of leaseable space is proposed in this phase. LOCATION: 8170 SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 .1Tax Lot 500). ZONE: Industrial Park (I-P). The I-P zoning district provides sites for light manufacturing and complementary related uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.18.150 and 18.164. CIT: West CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER Arborist Report STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317 SDR 96-0008 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK(PHASE II) PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD April 2, 1996 OREGON Nicoli Engineering & Construction Services, Inc. Attention: Jim Andrews 9025 SW Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Incomplete Submittal/Durham Industrial Park Phase 2 Site Development Review 96-0008 Dear Jim: This letter is in response to the development application filed for this property. The application is incomplete due to the arborist report requirement. The types of issues that are reviewed within the arborist report concern the size and condition of the existing trees, the viability of tree preservation, and tree protection measures. Upon review of the replacement plan, it only appears to be possible to plant up to 105 arborvitae given the proposed three-foot spacing over a 315-foot lineal distance. The landscape plan indicates that 350 arborvitae is proposed for mitigation purposes. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, 14/ 4 ` Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP i:lcurpin\mark_r\castile2 doc c: SDR 96-0008 File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 N 1 Kg IC: II :.1. 1 .2750 S.W. Pacific Hwy. - �-� OF �--R n MS-[77 n P.O. Box 23784 �s - n] n]lnlLly /�,1 I �s Tigard, Oregon 97223 au - ... .. R '�\:J g g ( DATE 30 --co, roe NO r (7J2 O and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 ,_^ -- wrr[rar,oNf , 4WW� TO A ALA Al AL_It P i* ..di I4L f , ` �_i _ �� — E GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings lE I3rints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications U--Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2.D 3.IS•IP 47 . : : .:.`. _ •,.• • _�._ • S .,F 1 . 1 ( 12--1 OLA6-fi'j(4.A ) _l_______. •3' 9 9 ra I lzgl ' A I q . 25•°“0 4 /2e j2.rrc,f- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: Igor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections El Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED• 4 10 . 11 ICI _ , 4. .q J and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784.Tigard, Oregon 97223 April 30, 1996 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 Mark Roberts Planning Department • City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Durham Industrial Park, Phase II • Jim Castile SDR-96-0008 Job#95-0930 Dear Mark: Please find enclosed the arborist report, prepared by Halsteads Arboriculture Consultants, for the Durham Industrial Park,Phase II development. Also, please find a revised site, landscaping plan(sheet 1.1.) The revised landscape plan incorporates the comments from the aborist report. We have also revised the quantities of the arborvitae. It appears that the mitigation requirement is satisfied(see landscape plan notes on sheet 1.1.) There was a minor mistake on the original site plan drawing. The R.O.W. dedication at Durham Road is 5 feet, not 10 feet as originally noted. The construction easement is 10 feet, not 5 feet. These revisions have been noted on the enclosed revised sheet 1.1. If you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, —b James D. Andrews Project Manager enclosures JDA:jh 04-26-1996 09:35AM FROr HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE TO 9684'636 F.01 HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE -Specialists the care and preservation of trees" • CONSULTANTS • bad Halstead Cons..itan'8 5 PC Sox 1 182 Tua!ann OP 970E2 Phone [5031245-1383 April 25 , 1996 ATTN. : Mr . Jim Castile S & L Landscape Inc . 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard , OR 97224 40 . Reference : Durham Industrial Park • �. % . Location : 8170 S .W . Durham Road Subject : Tree Removal , Protection , and Mitigation Plan I have inspected the site and the Site and Landscape Plan dated 3/18/96, prepared by Nicoll_ Engineering , for the purpose of Olt 11' providing a tree preservation , removal , and mitigation plan . After inspecting each tree , identifying the species and taking . 0 • _ careful measurements I offer the following . •' � General Field Conditions . There are 18 existing trees over 12 inches in caliper on this site . The landscape plan shows 18 trees on the site omitting one large Douglas-fir , but including a 9 inch caliper Shore Pine . The majority of trees are located along the west property line with the remaining r6 trees located towards the center of the site . , Most of the trees on this site were planted approximately 50 • . c years ago , perhaps to help define the property line and to provide shade and aesthetic value to the existing house . his,, Due to the variety of species , the symmetry of planting and there age it is apparent that the trees are not indigenous to the site , although many are native to this area . i y �. 04-26-1996 09:35W FRO ALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE TO 111 96E43636 P.02 Page 2 S & L Landscape Individual Tree Preservation Inventory . Out of the 18 trees on the site , 5 trees can be preserved . This gives us a 28 percent retainage of qualifying existing trees on this site . This percentage figure will be very important when we discuss mitigation later in this report . Starting at the north west corner of the property and proceeding south along the west property line the preserved trees are tagged Ip , 2p , ect . . The trees are identified , described and there health and structure are rated from excellent , good , fair , and poor , with poor being hazardous . Trees Numbered ip , 2p & 3p : There are three Silver Birch trees (Betula pendula) , with calipers of 18 , 12 , and 20 inches . The height of the trees is approximately 48 feet and the limb spreads average 15 feet in diameter . The health and structure are good . Orange barrier tree protection fencing is needed during construction to protect root zones . Root pruning may be needed during construction . Tree Number 4p : Tree is a Douglas-Fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii ) , with a caliper of 34 inches , an approximate height of 60 feet , and a limb spread of 25 feet in diameter . The health and structure of the tree is rated only fair due to lack of yearly needle growth and many dead limbs . Fertilizing and pruning the tree will invigorate the health and improve the structure and architecture of the tree . Orange barrier tree fencing is needed during construction . Root pruning may be needed . Tree Number 5p : Tree is a Silver Birch ( Betula pendula ) , with a caliper of 14 inches , an approximate height of 35 feet and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter . The health of the tree is good and the structure is fair . This tree needs pruning to correct slight structural problems and improper phototrophic growth due to overcrowding . Orange harrier fencing is needed during construction . Root pruning may be needed . Preservation Discussion . All parties involved with this project should be notified of the tree preservation area/s . High visibility fencing needs to be erected at least 15 feet from the trunk of the trees or as far as construction allows . 04-26-1996 09:36PM FROOHALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE TO S 96843636 P.03 Page 3 S & L Landscape The dumping of excess soil or construction material is not allowed within the dripline or tree fenced areas . No excavation will occur within the dripline of the trees without the notification and consent of the project arborist . Pruning and fertilizing may be prescribed by the project arborist as needed . Individual Tree Removal Inventory . There are 14 existing trees to be removed on this site due to there location in the proposed buildings , roadways and parking areas . The health and structure of these trees is at least fair to good . Starting at the west property line and just south of tree number 5p , I have numbered the trees to be removed lr , 2r , and ect . . The tree is identified and the caliper in inches is given . Tree Number Ir : White pine 22 inches Tree Number 2r : Noble Fir 25 inches Tree Number 3r : Western Red Cedar 29 inches Tree Number 4r : White Pine 25 inches Tree Number 5r : Western Red Cedar 18 inches Tree Number 6r : Austrian Pine 23 inches Tree Number 7r : White Fir 15 inches Tree Number 8r : Lawson Cypress 21 inches Tree Number 9r : Lawson Cypress 16 inches Tree Number lOr : Lawson Cypress 25 inches Tree Number 11r : Grand Fir 34 inches Tree Number 12r : Grand Fir 34 inches Tree Number 13r : Spruce 12 inches Total caliper inches 299 inches 04-26-1996 09:36AM FROM HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE TO 111 96843636 P.04 Page 4 S & L Landscape Tree Removal Discussion . Tree removal should be completed in a careful manner so as not to damage any trees to be preserved . Any tree to be removed within 15 feet of a tree to be preserved should have the stump ground out rather than excavated . Mitigation Discussion . We are retaining 28 percent of the trees therefor we are required to mitigate two thirds of the trees to be removed . If we multiply the total caliper inches of trees to be removed ( 299 ) by two thirds we get a total of 197 caliper inches to mitigate . Mitigation involves dividing our total mitigated inches by the largest reasonable available replacement tree in accordance to the City of Tigard Community Development Code Section 18 . 150. Dividing our 197 total caliper inches by the 3 inch replacement trees gives us a total of 66 , 3 inch replacement trees . I have located 3 inch caliper size replacement trees that would satisfy code requirements . It is my understanding per Code Section 18 . 150 . 070, E , that a monetary compensation may be made in lieu of tree replacement . Summary . I am confident that if the tree Preservation and removal recommendations are meet the trees to he preserved will continue to grow and thrive for many years . The new mitigation codes appear to have some flexibility in regards to replacement and compensation . However , the overall intent is clearly stated . Please call if you have any questions . I will be available upon your request to review these conclusions as necessary . Sincerely , OL4g / J i Phillip Whitcomb Certified Arborist TOTAL P.04 • • a■v1 N1COLI F4NGINEERING and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784*Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK PHASE 2 OWNER: JAMES AND AUDREY CASTILE 8100 S.W. DURHAM ROAD TIGARD, OREGON 97224 SITE INFORMATION ADDRESS: 8170 S.W. DURHAM RD. TIGARD, OR 97224 TAX MAP NO. : 2S 1 12CC TAX LOT NO. : LOT #500 TABLE OF CONTENTS: * - CITY OF TIGARD APPLICATION FORM -- APPLICATION CHECKLIST * - 8 1/2 X 11 SITE PLAN AND MASTER PLAN * - ASSESSOR'S MAPS * - VICINITY MAP * - APPLICANT'S STATEMENT * - LETTER REGARDING LAND USE NOTIFICATION MEETING * - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING * - AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING * - MAILING LIST * - SIGN UP SHEET FROM MEETING * - FRANCHISE HAULER APPROVAL * - REFERENCE INFORMATION FROM PHASE 1 STORM AND SANITARY SEWER R.O.W. INFORMATION S CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT a".•%!%1 APPLICATION CHECKLIST a!O I CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: 1/1/11311- /1/1 13 Date: / ZS °t't (APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ✓ MARKED ITE IS A) Application form (1 copy) d� B) Owner's signature/written authorization Imo`' C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies Z ' E) Filing Fee $ L. (SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ✓ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 2-0 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ❑ 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources �/ 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLIUTION I LIST P ACE 1 OF 5 8) Site Development In Indicating: of Copies P 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals m----- 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site b/- (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site m� (b) Parking and circulation areas rt/ -- (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ca/--- (e) Outdoor common areas (f) Above ground utilities d� 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site el■^ (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site o� 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped t1� 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios p� (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) owl (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals / (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated t�/ LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Drabs Indicating: 0 No. of Copies L.J - The site development plan proposal shall include: r;�/ 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures �" proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spacesASPow-- 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: //'� (a) Soil conditions d� (b) Erosion control measures that will be used �/ F) Si:n Dra :s: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code a part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Per it to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation stimate: ❑ H) Prelimina Partition/Lit Line Ad'ustment Ma. Indicatin•: No. of Copies 1 . The owner of the s •ject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authori d agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50, 00 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel lo ation and boundaries a 5. Location, width and nam s of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent o the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanent ildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all wat r courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6' or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and u lity easements ❑ 1 1. For major land partition which crea es a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way Ioca 'on and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the pro osed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preckude efficient future land division where applicable \ ❑ LAND USE APPLICkTION/LIST \\ PACE 3 OF 5 I) Subdivision Preli •'‘ Plat Map and Data Indicating: sNo. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 3 ,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed nam of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showi g property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses an telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer an designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application \ ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract tb be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a city-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-hf-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitar and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains inc uding fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated n the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants\ ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showin the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonadie distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate‘.,Iot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots) ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inch6 or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of p-oposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the ((\cation of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting \ ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: ■ , (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision imdrovements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlan, & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 4 OF 3 • J) Solar Access Calcula 'ons: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h AVo g i n\p atty\rn aste rs\I<k I is t.mst May 23.1995 LANG USE APPLICATION./LIST PACE 5 OF 5 a. S.W. DURHAM ROAD .a.r WC Nor M uran.rrr.rrn:i.n;1.rr? • .. ,f_7inn1JIJTl -- , 1 I i I , 1 1 1 rn �! I a I� : 1 3 "' 0 I-1 1 : 144. h d -c: TV P i% if! I z t k all 1 I 17,--- a =Q I :II 1 �g 11 111 , f191 ._ ..- _ � , ii ii � � lip � - ,1 . „ fi,, 8-- — 4111/. I . y C300 r -. C1.N0.UM `; ■ 1 1 S I.,tr::!:1sl:Il ib■i 1L.mte4 II,1 :i:71.'.H:! -a ee.1 1 1�1 R:N"I IM`IIC Iwo.OR11M or me One:5•6415M 1.MI. iiO Construcllm S.-4k05 Inc C*NLOPID MR OM Oe.tfl T wtrlR• 4a•.Vva1.Y•VR OUt S.1 Oft.51196.1'.0.-21711 TI1 N.D. 97723 1 •i tD 0O1♦ Noe 8031 RI-2171. I ..._•:::-..� -• ' fA 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , {1I r 744 811) 1 i '_J.�_1LLJ 1�1_JLU. _•�; 112.9.[ _ , I •n/ YAW Y. 1111 2222.,, �. ___ 11152..2 •..Y Y. r,l•u 1.171660611 441•600 06•44.Y. 00.111J Lwawowo NIA wwu Y. (WO 1 1 t R , ... Mall ° I AMw..MG .159696 I 1 f •' , ' � m P I %`• TA*tor. wY roswa ! t .01■106 f&WM'RS • a -r. ..4—,!AH• I T' ,R /ii (It MC..i 07R.at�'I.M RNOMVr 11 1 I " %Il.Illllilflllliiilll�' 11111111111111 IfflllffllllRlll�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII% .1 7. 1 N.D R N.T I D w ■ _/ II I M Tt! •TRI011IH MI.DI weawD/o■awll■D M RY0, al I 11 I ! j, b �%Illlllllllllllfifllll nS�lillllllllllrI11111111111113111111111111111111111% i :°` �I0/..674M.R..D.o. . 1 I 1 - —L40.CQ6 .rem maw rams SC to R 0? -- I w•`1R•••NN$SiflI••••O04441�w,c 111414.MA OS 010�•••• r E rr.-1111 + me 11111•1• -- - s• ,rr .;L—;. NJaRR■r.u+m Y w�l■•14AVEwRR►iwD Pow> evNCnew••nRRCwr wsaawwwarw I O10.e 194E M4,�,�MLORtlM11.AL �OV..••••••••• 4 44 fl m ry •11.11 •••-•• 1,4.4 4,1 I Iee1�I M 11O.RO.RO�.FIYe Me NO P.M tI04.01.W t 40011.401 PLO.■owl Wig AUO4044 Yew 01010.4014.014 0.11.011040 *03fNS 1 1 I 1 1 1 4 . .To M ITIIRI.a Oft li MO 404.4011.40.6 T 4.1 TWIN ww• STE PLAN L A M D•G•0■ •LAM MO,e. ni leMODCIlID AAta C 01166141160 40 M WNW•••••• 24.480 oil P V4L1.Ri0l.•T•IO1.RL K AWWW 11.0.1091 ALI LAND.AMC 9046.RL WAN••17111 OF 1010.LO/R11.001 No rnot Q 444*nto.ON ONnoulr. I106101 TYJMO 114 0 MO•aa 0041104.W 4••MOWN N RY1 7.1110024 OISC 17R M 1110 0.1111171.071071 Kn0100 4 40 CPA*KNOW M.IV uwn 10 N..4,10 N..YPE014.C.r O AM. 1 �.. R,"TJSr'J I I I I I I £ I 1 I 1 1 i 1 A I___= __ r . L 1 � .- -_ -- L IIIIIIIIIIIIIII -1_••7 912910,OREGON IIIIIIIIMMI I *; - L.,, ll, i ".` "I'S' CUENT .. i' �''! I CO�'L a'' i „ ---,.• w cl��� tea.wR ¢ I It 01»01111 INIx = PAR( • C w elrtwrL wr-wcry�F 5'1 � _4- 1 'HILL I jii= !� LAKE..-^'° w.oueHnMaono rI I I I I2= ,,r—..t.we == "'"D,OREGON nii�i iiiiiifl0fl. i I 3-1&% i II If111111li81111iiilllllll1111111111ll liilllflI IllI lllllllllllllllllllllllll :e:�1Y .� on d® ; 1 .�._G. !,0•1.714, .✓11.2 . •l.r�. or T.S. I �C�� �I � •d by 1509 111111IIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�•_!IIPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIIllllllllllllll I 9090 �� a 0- m1: �,.}.�M. =E a_ D'...Gw 1� .�2�:R �,,....e ,,•.eE� wwWiw��a+r�. I �r.� L..7� 0112 PLAN + I I o11...w...'*041100 00 1 y.la1a�� LAN�c 1 i EoO :G '7�� PLAN - aI I -1 1-_.4-1 Iwlr . - I..AIICeC PE PLAN ® +we..[11•10.ro 1111.11122.5..No• 2a wonD M K4w, 1°°1°07®MwRRao�m`.q: SHEE i 1 1 • S SEE MAP II 2S I (2CC 12 L "e__ (OLD HWY 2I7)- v.--S.W. T DURHAM T ' ii g69/33 90-18100 • '. —_ 14 11 's 13 • $01 500 • •I 300 r ' zo .04Ac. 70 600 134 AC. 5.184c. I ?O./9 AC. "I 400 w n 600-MI ( I SITE ?BAC. 0 I x L (L(M ArAAr _ _ fl a .r. •1 L., a 3 5 6.5' ,I at 0 ��Vfl j I o 0 o w a t. n r . f f ♦ nl o Q u I r- L J o W O N I� m r V I L 2 09' i a. 0 I�2r •a' — -- —jr.. I15 I 273. 7• ~n , I 3 1( _ — 3 1 1 6' _ — _ _ 1U ii I I I (CS No 1125° 4 N ° C N N_ II 1 1P 1 k — — 660' — — -- �3� — — 273.7• J (A 8 74.8' I L I 23 -74 CO to f 1 ds } m � , I W F I .4..) • 4 •-"1 .---20 I r 1 I . I r n �OPo aP 7, 2>.'7 ./. Z.77:.4 0 S , 5 :(.tiv i O N 1 iii ] ! -- hut [14 _lI_ I ---• i'_ IL Is%- ezzi Inii--E __ — =.1 _-- - 1111111717 rill-11 I fl 11 11411 TFORO s. , RI , i. ..1_11 1l? I 4 1 . - SW tiiR 44 eb - - - - 17113 • L t: til -I r, PHASE 2 r . PHASE P .,. !,Y , . USA I-- cl- • 1 REATMENT cA • (mix PLANT W _10 0 U) ( ----,.,,-- I i) co NORTfrt VICINITY MAP - ) __ _ _ rod7t05 a ///l/a rraii Ive • errrr=vzmriam■■■ MN \1■ Mr III 1wlw■ • and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 March 20, 1996 NARRATIVE Project: Durham Industrial Park -Phase 2 8170 SW Durham Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Light Industrial(I-L) Planned Industrial (I-P) Client: Jim and Audrey Castile 8100 SW Durham Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Job# 95-0930 The applicants are proposing to construct Phase 2 of the Durham Industrial Park complex. Phase 1 was approved per SDR 95-001. The water, storm, & sewer service were provided to the Phase 2 site during the development of Phase 1 (see sheet 1.2). Please find enclosed documents from Phase 1 which pertain to the storm and sanitary sewer services. Additional R.O.W. and a construction easement have already been granted to O.D.O.T. A joint access agreement from Durham Road between tax lot 400 (phase 1)and 500 (phase 2)was entered into as a requirement of Phase 1. There are19 trees existing on the site. Four of the existing trees, west of building D, are to be incorporated into the site design and the remainder are to be removed. The four trees which are to be retained have a combined caliper of 90 inches, and the trees to be removed have a combined caliper of 176 inches, leaving 86 inches of trunk caliper to be replaced. The applicant is providing 13 new trees and 350 arborvitae that have a combined caliper of 734.5 inches, which develops a positive caliper replacement of 648.5 inches, therefore no tree mitigation is required. NARRATIVE CONTINUED PAGE 2 The Castile's own and operate a landscaping company. With their experience and expertise they are confident that the trees which are to remain will survive. The trees will be protected by a fence when the site grading commences. If the city still insists on the added expense of an arborist report, I would like to suggest that it be initiated when the existing structures are removed and the site grading begins. It is during this phase of the construction process when the arborist can collaborate the Castile's decision on the survivability of the trees which are to remain. During Phase 1 of this project a master plan showing this phase of the development was reviewed by Schmidts Sanitary Service. I have enclosed a copy of the approval letter and site plan for your information There is a landscaped area located in the "center" of the two sites. The applicant is investigating the feasibility of either moving a couple of existing structures located on the site onto the center landscaped area or constructing two additional small office type structures. The introduction of these additional buildings will be dependent upon the market analysis which should be completed soon. It is understood that the required landscaping percentage and parking are to be maintained. To the best of our knowledge,this development meets the City of Tigards applicable approval standards. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager Name of applicant J I M CAA, l L E Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 2 S I l2 C- 5 o 0 Address or General Location 8 1 1 0 s.1,4. b U IZt-kA:M . AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, J►M GHST I LE , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating Interest in a proposed D VEt-OPMEN T affecting the land located at BM S.W. Dutz+t s.t� i , and did on the 3 I day of 3Pt4LtP�Y , 19 1 U personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a S lrp t V LOP MEI`4T application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at FEN(- A.4-4,1-4,671 t)L 12144f0M 1D• oP (state location on property) This .;<_.) day of "1112(4 , 19 9 Sature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this aG : :y of rya/CI , 19 9� V't 1 Notary Publl• for •= State of Oregon LARRY J. ESAU . 1 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Exp es: ior COMMISSION NO. 022997 f MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR. 17, 1997 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 login\Jo\postn ot.cit AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) 1, L) IM AtDiz-eWc-, , being duly sworn, depose and say that on ∎ AI-kLI.A>?.1-- 3 l , 19 `1 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at en l O S.W. pu 2t-t P,M tom. , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date Indicated above in the United States Post Office at -VI UA , with postage prepaid thereon. igna' re u Subscribed and sworn to before me this oT t! i'`-'►day of Ca- , 19(/( -"z OFFICIAL SEAL r . } LARRY J. ESAU f Notary Public "'` My Commission Expires: �` `� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 1 y p OMh11SSI0N N0. 022997 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR. 17, 1997 h:\Iogin\jo\affmail.cit SCHOOL DIST. NO. 23J ODA.T. EDWARD E. COTTER - 13131 S.W. PACIFIC HWY. 411 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 8065 S.W. DURHAM ROAD TIGARD, OREGON 91223 SALEM, OREGON 91310 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 JAMES AND AUDREY CASTILE JUDITH A. BENJAMIN MARION MARLIN GOBLE 8110 S.W. DURHAM ROAD 15965 S.W. 81st COURT 8025 S.W. DURHAM ROAD TIGARD, OREGON 91224 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 RICHARD AND TERESA BOWEN CYNTHIA R. ROGERS P.O. BOX 94 15981 S.W. 81st COURT 15932 S.W. 81st COURT TUALATIN, OREGON 91062 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 MICHAEL H. NEWBERRY EDWARD L. VICKREY BILL MITCHELL 15954 S.W. 81st COURT 15910 S.W. 81st COURT 13380 S.W. ASH AVE. TIGARD, OREGON 91224 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 JACK KIETHAN JOHN KENNETH JACK KIETHAN 15525 S.W. 109th AVE. 1550 S.W. 109th AYE. 15525 S.W. 109th AYE. TIGARD, OREGON 91223 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 TIGARD, OREGON 91224 r i SIGN UP SHEET C.I.T. MEETING CASTILE PROJECT 2/12/96 NAME ADDRESS PHONE /YVAit/AJ&. t'vcE ii,vA--4:.24a3 /C/V 00Gc)EA1 ZES. 8/7S 3c J 17UP/IAM T/60tmzi 3L9—0/9/7 SCIIMI" SANITARY SERVIr-', INC. 8325 S.W. Ross St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Phone 639-2378 Solid Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Drop Box Service Eatabllahed In 1949 /'95 4/co Z A-i/4e(A-7 t� , �46L y ,lee‘vfee;rt-1-1---- / , / memek a■re-K- A‘l"le;d CO Y 1/ -4/ ete-y GI; 4411 `'"` )PV-Z-V--- . a 4� � % . /24,t4t,h- afe" 40114/avk-704.4 AL;37- fit,v-e- :40 }Oa-ti-;"j _ ` r4/ ar/t4 1/-/14- ■MI00 ,I ■ RAW..A TAW ip.M - - uN�f1 Q _ e "-1 ;', __I :Ay./ T L iii.,_/ O 1i i1s ��t r ' ==1 I -- I' NDUSTRIAL d . ' ■1 M. i� . I • - 'c' : V: tn ^, �_ 1■ PAFK /j '. . i ~ __ D NH1W ROA D Ao C / =.- NI' ", _�� MW � � _' Own* , I Il i L.••ITiiii IW..by Y.S._ __ . _ - ••_ .C..aid by J.D.A. ...Mb.G. W*30 :Awn.•c ■A51 vW� .eue•A.e . 4 t .arc •r.c. _ PLAN MASTER SITE PLAN . 2.3 Legal Description: 251 13B /".(7 Tax Lot No. 00600 (7- STORM DRAIN EASEMENT Name of Grantor: Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County, a municipal corporation of the County of Washington and State of Oregon Address: 155 North First Avenue, Hillsboro, Oregon 97007 Grantor, owner of the property described herein, does hereby grant unto James W. Castile and Audrey Castile, 7800 S.W. Peters Road, Durham, Oregon 97224, Grantee, their successors and assigns, the right, to lay down, construct and perpetually maintain storm drainage facilities above, through, under and along the property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. This grant of easement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. This grant is made upon the conditions attached hereto, marked Exhibit B and by this reference incorporated herein. This grant is made subject to no other conditions. This instrument does not grant or convey to the Grantee any right or title to the surface of the soil along the route of said sewer except for the purpose of laying down, inspecting, restoring, maintaining, and replacing the sewer line. No structure shall be erected upon said easement without the written consent of the Grantee. The consideration for this transfer is $1,190.00. C IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor above-named, has hereunto set his hand and seal this day of , A.D. , 19 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BY Bill Gaffi , General Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: B . A ified a e- • .e *gency Counsel STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) DATE Personally appeared known to me to be the General Manager of the above-named municipal corporation who executed the instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation and declared it to be the voluntary act of the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County authorized by its Board of Directors. Notary Public for State of Oregon My Commission Expires: Return to: James and Audrey Castile 7800 S.W. Peters Road Durham, Oregon 97224 EXHIBIT B EASEMENT CONDITIONS 1 . The Grantee shall confine his construction operations to within the easement limits or make special arrangements with the Agency if additional area or access is required. 2 . The excavated trench materials shall be stockpiled so as to do the least damage to adjacent areas. Upon completion of backfilling , the Grantee shall remove all excavated materials and leave surfaces in a condition equivalent to their original condition. All areas disturbed by the Grantee ' s operations inside easements shall be seeded. All areas shall be raked and graded to conform to their original contours and shall be free-draining, free from holes , rough spots , or other surface features detrimental to a seeded area . The Grantee shall correct by addition or disposal , regrading and reseeding, any excess or deficiency of backfill material which becomes apparent prior to final acceptance of the project . All existing drainage facilities shall be reopened and graded and natural drainage restored. In lieu of stock-piling the topsoil , imported topsoil may be substituted in the top twelve ( 12 ) inches . 3 . During the time that the work is in progress , the Grantee shall make every effort to maintain the site in a neat and orderly condition. ( All refuse, broken pipe, excess fill material , cribbing, etc. , shall be removed as soon as practicable. Should the work not be maintained in satisfactory condition, the Agency may cause the work to stop until the cleanup portion of the work has been done to the satisfaction of the Agency. 11/95 :eb • EXHIBIT "A" l arc z LEGAL DESCRIPTION CASTILE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT A strip of land fifteen (15.00) feet wide in the northwest one-quarter of Section 13, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Tigard, Washington County Oregon, being a portion of that land in deed to Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County (USA) described in Book 860, Page 515, Deed Records. Being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of said USA property 23.00 feet from the most easterly northeast corner of said USA property; thence S 0°22'13" E 53.00 feet parallel with the east line of said USA property; thence S 89°37'47" W 15.00 feet parallel with the north line of said USA property; thence N 0° 22'13" W 53.00 feet to a point on the north line of said USA property; thence N 89°37'47" E 15.00 feet to the point of beginning. C 14.95 s&lesmt3 ;7.4 _)‹ t( /1—ft - per. Z oP z . C,gsri ch' N .QOG. �°� 89' - 3 9 9,2 I" = 20' , 4• !3._ N 4;37 '-•?7' 4-7''E CJRIrW/YI ,41Do • �`- ,- oa' -f 3. o UN/,/FAO J d /E2.4 G ciA/C" 1111 /3/r.860 to OI ( 0 • _- '� S 8?°.37'1-�" ' r5. Co' rn .a io Ip J) CASTILE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT DIAGRAM - . -.---- . .............._ ,...iri4.---m•TAirr.6z-r.,....:, ■ - -,,:•r' '...,..1.-r.f_-_-',..z* •_. - 1 .-- RECEIPT . , - Date /7 .‘4:::' 4-,.. 19 / - No. 3267 i ....„.......„, ., Received From 7:2K-,-.A-L'--- (.41-/• /:-.----/ '/--' Address . '- . '4,-: 2 J /Z '722 . Dollars $ ' co For •-r-7-c2-eill=1.1--7..../.-Jell — 7 e-_--, / ' -7'.., 72„. ..... . ...,,...., 1 1 ACCOUNT HOW PAID 11 AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH AMT. PAID CHECK>e I'qc ,L) ' • e- BALANCE MONEY , . DUE ORDER By c ,•i-(:-.. .....- ----.,40.....-- ... ..'- ) (t4”- (.. . ii4 ►r:, S CITY OF TIGARD September 7, 1995 OREGON James and Audrey Castile 8100 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97224 Subject : Sewer Connection for Proposed Industrial Development at Situs Address (Your letter of August 7, 1995) Your request to allow the use of one private sewer lateral for the proposed development on Tax Lots 2S1 13B 400 & 500 is agreeable to the Engineering Department, who we will recommend to the Building Department that a permit be issued, with the following contingency: Pursuant to Section 8 . 02 . 5 , USA Resolution and Order No. 91- 47, the applicant shall establish a deed restriction that requires each property owner to be jointly responsible for the • maintenance of the private sewer system. A copy of the recorded deed restriction shall be provided to the Building Department upon application for permit. This joint use is considered an extension of the approval of SDR 95-0001 wherein the City required the two properties to share driveway access to SW Durham Road along their common property line. Please call should you desire any additional information. Sincerely, oiichael J. And `ed rson Development/Review Engineer c: David Scott, Building Official MA\Castile.ltr 13125 SW Hcdt.131vd. lTgard OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 WASHINGTON COUNTY, ;,. OREGON May 18, 1995 James Castile and Audrey Castile 7800 S.W. Peters Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 RE: ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR S.W. DURHAM ROAD PROJECT NO. 2289 S.W. HALL BLVD. TO S.W. UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD 2S 1 13B,T.L. #500 - (27) CASTILE Washington County has approved a construction project for the improvement of S.W.Durham Road lying between S.W. Hall Boulevard and S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road, Project No.2289. This roadway has been identified as a substandard roadway due to narrow lane widths, lack of pedestrian facilities, and limited sight distance as a result of inadequate vertical and horizontal curves. In order to construct said project as designed,Washington County will need to acquire additional right-of-way, and ancillary easements along S.W. Durham Road, from your site. The property acquisition has been appraised and the County would make this offer to you for delivery of a Dedication Deed, and ancillary easements,granted to Washington County for the use of the public. The document is attached, with the property rights being acquired described in said document. The conveyance must be free and clear of all taxes, liens, and encumbrances, conveying the acquisition rights described thereon. For the conveyance, I have been authorized by Washington County, based on the appraisal, to offer you, and do hereby offer to you, the sum of$3,500.00 for this partial acquisition. The acquisition of the property will be handled for the County by Dave Moore. Please review this information and if acceptable to you, sign the enclosed document and return it to Washington County to Dave Moore's attention. Your signature on the Dedication Deed must be notarized. Payment will be made 4 to 5 weeks after the signed document is received by the County. The County will take possession upon payment. In order to process payment for right-of-way acquisition our finance department is now requiring persons receiving money to fill out a W-9 form so they can accurately fill out the 1099-R form they are required to file. You are required to report these funds to the IRS and should send a copy of the dedication deed to show where the money came from, but are not required to declare it as income. If you sell your property at a later date, you may or may not be required to declare capital gains tax on these funds. If you have any questions concerning this matter, or need a Notary please call the acquisition agent, Dave Moore at 693-4823 as he is available to assist you. Sincerely, / 1/ Tom Sp r Acting Right-of-Way Supervisor c: Acquisition Agent Dave Moore, Right-of-Way Technician ]:\...\ROW\D U R2289\D U R27CAS.W P5\4 Department of Land Use and Transportation, Right-of-Way Section Phone: 503/648-8896 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350-15 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 FAX: 503/693-4412 (PROPERTY OWNER IMPROVEMENT RETENTION OPTION) If you wish to retain, for their salvage value, any of your improvements which are considered to be a part of the real property including, landscaping you may do so providing such items and/or improvements are removed from the above described real property by the 24th day of August , 1995 unless a removal date extension is granted in writing by an authorized representative of the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Right of Way Section. Items considered property of the owner that may be retained and their salvage value are: (1) Landscaping This offer is based on a review and analysis of an appraisal of this property by this Department or a fee independent appraiser. Your signature on this OFFER TO ACQUIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY is for the verification that such an offer has been made to you and does not prejudice your right to have the final amount determined through condemnation proceedings in the event you do not accept the offer. I CERTIFY THAT, on this 18th day of May , 1995, a copy of this document, a description of the land acquisition process and the owner's rights, privileges, and obligations were mailed/delivered to the owner of record. J1 s Castile Audrey Cas ile 541 -62-4060 Social Security # \ Federal I .D. # // 541 -50-9506 (�• \A 1' SS # of Audrey Castile mavid C. Moore" Acquisition Agent Castile's Telephone No. 620-7512 MAILED TO: James & Audrey Castile 7800 S.W. Peters Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 Page 2 of 2 J:\.. .1ROW1DUR2289\DUR27CAS.WP5\6 OFFER TO ACQUIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY STATEMENT OF COMPENSATION TO: James Castile and PROJECT NO. 2289 Audrey Castile FILE NO. 27 7800 S.W. Peters Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97224 MAP & TAX LOT. 2S 1 13B 500 SITE ADDRESS: 8170 S.W. Durham Road The Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Right of Way Section hereby offers all interested parties who may have an interest in the real estate to be acquired the sum of $ 3,500.00 , which has been determined to be just compensation for such property and rights based upon the fair market value of the property. A summary of the amount set out above as just compensation is as follows: (A) Identification of the real property to be acquired: 1) Acquisition of 710 Sq Ft of permanent right-of-way (Dedication Deed) 2) 922 Sq Ft as Temporary Construction Easement (2 years) (B) Identification of real property improvements including fixtures not owned by the owner of the land: NONE (C) Summary of fair market value and offer of acquisition rights: (1) Land, Easements with Landscaping $ 3,447.00 (2) Damages $ 0 (3) Less Benefits $ 0 (4) Total $ 3,447.00 $ 3,500.00 (Rounded) Page 1 of 2 J:\...1ROW\DUR22891DUR27CAS.WP515 II • I I _ , I NIA 0 LI • INS IINIvRING and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 February 1 , 1996 To whom it may concern, There will be a meeting to review preliminary plans for the construction of the second phase of the Durham industrial park complex (see attached sketch). The meeting will be held at the office of Nicoli engineering on February 12, 1996 at 6:00 PM. Project address: 8170 S.W. Durham Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 Meeling Address: 9025 S.W. center Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Contact Person: Nicoli engneering James D. Andrews CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: 2`f /6 STAFF: Vvl 6 t 6 Y� APPUCANT: 4.4/14 6a54I 1- AGENT: /1' C4 E-14 7, ort 4 4i Phone:( 1 Phone: I 1 ZO-1JgC PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: 1-1 cw ii)arliaA44 Bad TAX MAPITAX LOT: 2S I I 4-•,c. (of--n p Sao NECESSARY APPUCATION(S) c 147_e___ 0,(2-tiao(op PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 0£U to [ d !d/ 4V-Lictafr 5 pa ce COMPREHENSIVE t �-I- PLAN DESIGNATION: L 1 0— J L4 t L I a ZONING DESIGNATION: T (dam uteri a l ( i1T_- u�1 FACI- LITATOR: S Y S° U1 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT �o ' TEAM AREA: PHONE 15031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: /4/ sq. ft. Average lot width: 50 ft. Maximum build' g height: L75 ft. Setbacks: front -3� ft. side Gt fit ft. rear ft— ft. corner ii ft. from street. covers e: '7S % Minimum langed or natural vegetation area: % Maximum site g (Refer to Code Section 18. 6 ) CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 IOIReside.tial application!Pla inmg Department Section ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL QUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 2 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a artition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access asement. The depth of all lots shall note Geed 2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum lot size of a applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 ts) SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ Streets: feet from the centerline of 5"u' D tv.4 4.1 ➢ Established areas: n1 feet from h,/.r ➢ Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's //.7 boundary. (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least '/2 (half) of the building's height; and • The�t�c ure wi not abut a residential zone—district (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: p_P•r P�� 0 4 Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): 2`Z �- 'i Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): i No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. CRY OF T1GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 ION Residential appication/Ptanning Department Section 1 ,Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle rack- shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. MiM1 01I1.P Minimum access width: ->G nimum number of accesses: Minimum pavement width: -2_1-1 All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. i rive-in use queuing areas: h m (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between building/ in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkway should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. . (Refer to Code Section 1 : I BUFFERING AND SCREEN! G In order to increase pr acy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, specially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site rimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must b occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balanc between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only b occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer are materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) ' i CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of B NOS Resideatial ano&cationlPlaama Department Section The required buffer widths which re applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north b undary. ft. along east boundary. ft. along south bo dary. ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is re uired along LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well a driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provide regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable • ound. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference .ased on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely . "II - . 11 . • 11 I . e , . . I. - . . l It S • - • • • • I - • meeting the definitions of sense ' lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NOM Re:ide.tid appicatPonJRaanq Department Section Chapter 18.84 also provides regul. ions for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is pr• ibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100- year floodplain areas to the City for p. k and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; I i * Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in f caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. Iaccording to the following standards: 1 ➢ Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; ➢ Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires . that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and * A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) I CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 roare.u.l■av�,cnorPf,nr..a Department Section i t MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: D A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. > If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. > The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. I In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the ' Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) —} I NARRATIVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.92 00 18108 / 18.120 50 18.84 _ 18.96 118 2 X18.114 _ 18.130 _ 18.160 18.88 _ 18.98 18.106 4_,----111.116 18.134 18.1 18.164 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING `� The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. 1 CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 11011 Residential aapbaDoniPlan mg Department Section •EC • . G — Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177 (Refer to Code Section 18.116) — ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: i m p s„ !/',2_,u r acts N Q P h i-,Y /9afilkii Y` UireA4rd5 , � s w4i a1-Q LioQ1pt, S-4-1.J-tac-ait s”o 44 s I 11'-irl sx/)/e ,- - pe_c_r L41 p,I4,-c o (2 Li,caves Qy dt414.t4 4/ w41‘ 1 Cw.e, `4-0 be ov e) wt 10e_, KIWI etird 4q-Gw I ( +-o a ti t // a Lo(1724 (v 0 1/14C200( /'.f, IP vavae_ 044 ak%La 0) .1.-- Per04— o I�ieufi P fdemlief/ ,--. s & Ov- `f'4-R ke-C�SS1 - ye(�Dta , 5 L tis u (+1 irfiR k'014) Ir. (a2 ÷9 3 5 no * so & 4-0 S W K Su W fc 44, PROCEDURE k Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Nanning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. _ • • ' -• , . ' L • • - - • - • l .1 1 • 14 . , i. .. . 1 el . I . CITY OF TIGARD Pm-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 11011atesil.,rid sopkzUo %ar..q Department Section Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8-5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative_decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accented. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard P i a u>n,J N -6ocv yv�, 5 stcv\ . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available frorjhe Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code.or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) is/are required if an application(s) is/are to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 h:Uogin\patty\masters\preapp-C.m st (Engineering Section:masters\preapp-c.eng) I CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 RONResideatial appicamaelan ing Department Section 4' • PUBLIC FAC1UTIES CITY OF TIGARO The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: OREGON (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decssior making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended bk City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision makin( authority an behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies. City staff and the public have had an apportunir, to review and comment an the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirement: that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width a: specified by the Community Development Code: or (2) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for (1.) to feet from centerline. (2.) to feet from centerline. (3.) to feet from centerline. J- , fD 7Z4 /�,�} -ate vQ i1,e J Street improvements:: (1.) street improvements will be necessary along (2.) street improvements will be necessary along (3.) Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the instailation of curl and gutters. storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determine( appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wide. on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights and a two year streetlighting fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 3 In some cases, where street i,. ,vements or other necessary public impr. ants are not currently practical, the sue improvements may be deferred. In such cases. a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the proper: owner(s) to execute a agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formatic of a local improvement district formed to improve: (1.) - (2.) - Pedestrianwayslbikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest witary sewer line to this property is a(n) k' inch lime which is located in 0. L . The proposed development must be connected to a sani ary sewer. It the developer's responsibility to extend the a ielr along the proposed development site's Water Suppiv: The Water 0iszict - Phone(503) provides public water service in th! area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply far your propose- development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact Gene BirchaU, (503) 526-2502) provides fire protectioi services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequac• of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: D )0 T Storm sewer improvements: /441z / - erY1 4-42-4314;ty la-c/20/-d-04' STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Wate Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities.. At the discretion of the City, th applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility andlor the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of imperviou: surface: for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall he $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine a fee may be paid or a faciin shall e constructed. CITY OF_TIGARO Pre-Application Conference 3otes Page 2 of 3 aeseeecai loo catravc^2neennn ear t TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TM ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collect. fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applican shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development The calculation of the TIE is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based le' category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TW ma be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5.000.00. STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street openinc_ permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED BOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This flooi plan shad indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: ENGINE NG DIVISION PHONE: (503) 6394171 S'SO¢nlpittronuocurt .'17Q-SaA00�! -M[ Jacuary 11. ;ac CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Votes Page 3 of 3 Residential.ivaicanonEwrcctrq Oecarm+ea Sermn CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST ?1 '�G� CITY OF TIGARD • The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: 04 13 Date: 0-5/It I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITE A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed d� D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies E) Filing Fee $ 5 €.a - I SITE-SPECIFIC MAPS)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE./ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) (1� 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds b/— 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 0 8. Location of existing structures and their uses Z 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements j"I 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND LSE APPLICATION J LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties • 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site fz� (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area W-'"---- (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped a� 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11. The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies -.20 The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: m� (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Drab ,s Indicating: No. of Copies - The site development plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures mod' proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open space Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: d� (a) Soil conditions (b) Erosion control measures that will be used F) Sign Dra gs: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code . part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Per -t to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation stimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/L et Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . The owner of the s •ject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authori -• agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,' 00 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel lo ation and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width and nam-s of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent o the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanent • ildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all wa -r courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6 or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and u,'lity easements ❑ 11. For major land partition which crea es a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way loca on and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the pro oosed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not prec de efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPLKATION/UST PAGE 3 OF 3 I) Subdivision Prelimi y Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 31,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed nam• of the subdivision o 3. Vicinity map showi •g property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses an. telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer an. designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract t4 be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdi ision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land a 8. Contour lines related to a ity-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater th.n 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type .nd size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subo ivision): (a) Public and private right if-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanita and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains inc ding fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone tra smission lines (50,000 volts or greater) a (e) Watercourses a (f) Deed reservations for parks, .pen spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances 0 10. Approximate plan and profiles of pr.posed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated •n the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distributio system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showin: the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasona. e distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street rig t-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow a 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all wa er courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for p rposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inch s or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of p oposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the I cation of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a state ent of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) a (b) Proof of property ownership a (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision im ovements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlan & marsh areas ❑ 21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be hown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative nd submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 4 OF 5 J) Solar Access Calcula 'ons: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:Uogin'patty mastersU<kIist.mst May 2). 1995 LANO USE APPLICATION J LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 —. ......... .-�,..�.::.s:,.-X.4::....:_.... .. • rat...". [ mvi I 1-\17.00v1 ► , 1 ,irPl■■Illri. MIL I.. ?,: :■ :Dt2 1 , :n .v f I� VIII 4igl t &wis P.7/r 551 7+ iii r°1- o t '1 ��vas R 12 implivi az mag .: :II lam *doe .1 . Toveler um crowd rediMatami rr d .�itr tt1,v II/IIC] C7/IIIII 1- i • - . leszipll1 3. ror Els - . • # ,i ..kl° wtolPIG; :D. 41 i I'm - sine,Nigifirl..11=1..21 ILI F of .fit did �� ,411E111 —∎4 ' 11111 _ . Q �� �►� � . . '�/�t� 1 �IIU91 �.NII�I�n R )1... - ii. ;� �...1p 11 mull a ' tarivinei 1 j j 11 •I ulllilll •� dhl1111■ i� I.ull�t�_r., nil ■ ■■ ■� !a- „ TIGARD ' siTE pillipr ...,,....,.. /.% , HIGIA I i i .....Z SCHOOL Z TREUSAA11,0art •• IP I. Altilit744illiol < , ' ; 1—P Loviettv rib,. I.. gni . CL I . Riatiafi. i'-/crtiliPlii Mir-: P40,2 -���� CC UI ■; , . .. 1 t,, • •� 'e� i. .IU WI* �` i_P Q.. 0 —12 e . ;.: . ..:• a . ::.. DuR.-; , AIM vo 77 . - ... 1.--'410P Or ;oaf;e 1111 LL 0 1 etv4 71•1‘ sliviiiit :21-11:117. Ell >- 71 cr .. v...w. gm... 4.: ",4)\ F..' U VICINITY CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP SDR 95-0001 VAR 95-0001 • MIS 95-0003 Properties to the west and south are zoned I-P. The property to the east developed as the Durham Elementary School is zoned R-12 . The surrounding properties to the south are developed with the Unified Sewerage Agency Sewage Treatment Facility and the Durham Elementary School. Areas along the north side of SW Durham Road are developed or developing with residential uses. 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has street frontage on SW Durham Road and an access easement which serves the Durham Elementary School site. The northerly portion of the site is developed with an older single family residence. The southerly portion of the site contains accessory structures and areas used for the owner's landscape maintenance business. 4 . Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: Findings: 1. STREETS: The site plan proposes access from SW Durham Road, a State highway, and an Arterial street as shown on the City Comprehensive Plan. The applicant should obtain an ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Durham Road. The highway currently consists of a two lane road with minimim paved shoulders and has been included in the MSTIP bond levy to finance the future widening. The City Council on April 9, 1990, determined that developments along SW Durham Road east of SW Hall Boulevard would not be required to construct half-street improvements, with the exception of interim improvements, with safety the principal consideration. Sufficient right-of-way has been dedicated to the State along the Tax Lot 400 frontage. In reference to the proposed access, it is recommended that the driveway incorporate a radius design per City Standards to facilitate future truck traffic. In addition, the site design should provide for joint access with Tax Lot 500 in order to minimize driveways connecting to the State highway. In order to minimize driveway connections to this arterial, the site plan should be redesigned for one joint use driveway. In addition, the driveway construction should be coordinated with the new street design for SW Durham Road that is being administered by the Washington County Road Section Team. The location of the proposed driveway is the same as the existing driveway. It appears that exiting traffic may not have sufficient sight distance at this location, due to the short vertical curves of the existing SW Durham Road construction. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located intermittently along both sides of SW Durham Road and the applicant should place the facilities located along the site highway frontage underground, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 2 . SANITARY SEWER: The applicant constructed a private sewer lateral that extends from the site across the contiguous Durham School property to the existing sewer main that is located in an easement at the rear of the school . This main line connects directly to the nearby USA sewer plant. The existing eight inch public sanitary sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 95-0001/VAR 95-0001 - CASTILE PROJECT - PAGE 3 P 1 I I I I -- .--1...--1.. 1 - ..■ 4-______ ‘V 2 't WI_ 2S112CG00200 I 9_______ , . ----- 2S112CG03900 2': C-044a a IN I' C - 2S1120G04000 1119'• ■ \ 2S112CG04101 D-1e200 A T11 I 2' '' ..000 c 1 I N i 2S • 0 2S112CC-06600 2'112CG04 90 2' 2S1'2CGr. :" 2'112CG04 90 , o'wel-� S1121 D-0 /! �• i! 45200 0521 P S112CG05510 29 112CG05300 O D 2S'12CG15400 2S112CC-051002S112CG!•:.: 2S1'20GC5200 2S1'200-04900 2S112CC-0500C 2S112CD-15000 2S1 2�N90�04800 ' 200-057// .--/ ei • 4-0, 165 .. 2CG05801 2S11200-01900 2S112CC-02000 2S112CD-01200 'S1124 C-05910 ■ fLRD i I 1 r 1 — Vicinity Mai Notification Map l.,�,..... N SDR 96-0008 . I _ . NICO1J _ _ _ _ _ ENGINEERING G and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 June 26, 1996 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 Mark Roberts City of Tigard-Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Durham Industrial Park Phase II SDR-96-0008 Job#95-0930 Dear Mark: The following is in response to your letter dated June 21, 1996 regarding the conditions of approval. 3.A A note regarding the installation of the protection measures can be found under the "Landscape plan notes" on sheet 1.1. B. Two additional parking lot trees have been provided between building C & Cl and east of the parking spaces at building D. C. Two handicapped spaces have been provided. The space southwest of building D has been noted as a van accessible space. D. The original franchise hauler agreement was enclosed with the original submitted package. This agreement was performed for Phase I,but included both phases for approval. This information has been attached. 4. The "Planting Schedule"on sheet 1.1 note that the Birch&Fir trees are to be preserved(5 total.) This information has been added to the landscape notes to help clarify/reiterate which trees are to be saved. If you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, mes D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:jh enclosures (J •J T vi - IQQ1 'o/ *364 Lo.Q ( ( `li't e ec a (e+}r.✓' e✓ow� `'ate c..vtoo■•• :s16---// )+ f L +fte v e co vu ,2�dJ _ve, i va 4Qd c� U v& l 4 d loci/- Ctls s e c�a'j I c 1 t . W.a` ( ( 1 ,eed o rs vt,cv'� iSsuA(4 c� 0e- 54)-4,2 ra V'lA c*--, &it-4-- X31(5 0 V � qu o Q4' Post-ir Fax Note 7671 Date 7/2" / Ias► t To M1/4 Vvt , / f From iNt itLV�P��ezei)A, Co./Dept. v t fcg i C Co. DC 1 /4 al! Phone* I Phone# b 4 i�/ Fax# L'/_- / Fax# UrrA4 UNIFIED Date " SEWERAGE File AGENCY 155 N. FIRST AVENUE Project • • iL HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 (503) 648-8621 Subject To C/1)'-'1-7 of 7; 4-#172d) / J / 3/ Z5 S% i 4( 15? -Jo -77 it .0 ©R 97&Z Item Copies Date Description / -s t - eeo _ L, Pe-Arw S ri as you requested Remarks S E..e9/11/11 17- >;a-for your information ❑ for your approval ❑ for your review return requested F rom . ../�I 81-419 fL . spy 9(0- coot?) KI• 711 If 1 • I '750 S.W. Pacific Hwy. z 0 �� :11 it 16 1 •lr>I P.O. Box 23784 s u u OF IrMQUVSM_TTQ �����:�� ��a��� Tigard, Oregon 97223 ahi____ �1 q\. ` DATE oe NO and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 1 J t • 9 (p 5043 3 D ATTENTION TO 7_lA,y G r. RE r'ECEIVED - JUL 1 9 1996 GENTLEMEN: COMMMTy DEVELOPMENT WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: O Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications 2r.--Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I 4 .2'1.96 3 gtawn filr er-Vk ate. C.4...¢(,u-P.a in a "11 . 14..q5 2 rte. - . 1 • • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: C—�'/For approval O Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval L? For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNEe• i 01J J1GI 11 ERIN and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 July 18, 1996 City of Tigard Engineering Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Brian Regar RE: Durham Industrial Park Phase II 8170 SW Durham Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 SDR#98-0008 Job#95-0930 Dear Brian: We were asked, per item# 1 from the"Conditions of Approval,"to demonstrate that the storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainage way without impacting down stream properties. After contacting Unified Sewer Agency(owners of the 30" line)Tigard School District(required to maintain 12"diameter line)and the engineer for Schaffer Avenue and its drainage way(Chase&Jones)we are still unable to verify,by calculations that the drainage system will not impact downstream properties. For your information, it appears that the drainage system downstream from the project site flows directly into Fanno Creek. Conversation with U.S.A. personnel direct us to believe the system can easily accept Phase II runoff. During the recent flooding the system was capable of handling the increase runoff with out any problems, according to U.S.A. personnel. It is our understanding that when Unified Sewer Agency allowed the easement and connection to the drainage system that they understood the amount of runoff being added to their system, and that the system was capable of handling the additional flow or they would not have allowed the connection in the first place. In our request to Stan LeSieur, Deputy General Manager at Unified Sewer Agency, it was clearly stated the easement and storm drainage connection request was for two tax lots, (Phase I and Phase II)of approximately 2.32 acres(letter enclosed). 4 July 18, 1996 Page 2 I hope this will satisfy your concern regarding the capacity of the system. Also please find enclosed the calculations for the on-site water quality facility. If you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, aivvA-0-4L James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:jh enclosures iii lFi :i� ■r�� i I■ i�u•i imi u _•i� 111 L/&!1I.L and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: (503) 620-2086 STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS and BURIED PIPE TRENCH DESIGN FOR: DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENT TIGARD, OREGON Mare <a11 1,135`` ' i RF.rcru t■ 4/0'17 .9 . .0� ti'FS . WC" EXPIRES. 12.31.96 1 CLIENT : 4111 CASTILE PREPARED BY : S.E.T. CHECKED BY : J.R.N. DATE : 4 •249 (.i PACE I OF r -TOR 141 PRa,NAhe 1:71r7 nes, b T FIFE, C PAC I-TY5 US I rl 4 MA MJ?J I r,.1C s t 1L1c.� W/ P V,G. FIFE- � Rooclo ►HESS Go FFILlenr't = D.ol le?" 4 Su D.b2 = 4,028 CPS g4 41 d.o2 - Z . 22 c�5 O" S aos c I . 2 4' S 0.0 .2 = x , 032 GF5 dP s : 0.oi = 0. 549 cFs 4-4 4, s O,02 L C7, '350 CAPS • S" e s = 4, a i S r- 0. /4- 1 c Fs 1" d' S : O. OoS = O, 081 CPS .A r- 0#6/0 A s ARI=A ac Ki".5 GNEGK 41140 p/P1E. 7R,RUTARY5 = 13C,06 . 1� (9 (CM )(g,4)(44a,) - a28/ GFs < 3670 c •5 I I 1 1yc G. / (J c$ PIPE < -rrz,,307A2`t's CS* / jI ; . D6. Gs (0,64145500 1- 48a.))1) 56 - - GIIC* Id P,Ie s 7',Cieu TAB'YS ALL of A►3ovE ÷ 61312 ) G84 $-065. AIS,G ai (1.005)4 (a7O)(S4)('IZ1I' I 4- a331 t t31 1.o) 0,008 crs 43 5(00 )aaB < 4, 02/3 At. PROJECT PREPARED BY DATE 4.21.q I JOB NO. 95 09 3 0 PAGE NO. Z OF 3 SLI R I Efl Fl Fe 17F N)C "Dt~ S I & NJ PPsibM CRITERIA PEsi6N RE-rA► N o, v" Or T24 N rA(-L►N E 1N 4 Ptoorzs w n-4 Ar) A+/rfA6s 'Re--UQN •peR►op c 9 s ` A l I')J o ii4 r 4-!,0" , o 4 L EN67H 13 S l c"." -1100-414 o1-ro M 4 E 4- = (4.)C I Ss") s,F PER 60,X-1100 'TEST ReSUL:rS Eric. CA •) Ar3Sorr3 4 012 4- c F A-I /5P MPIcRVIous ARE=A -r0 13M Go(. L5c7E,D 4 ) E352- S,F 1 TiL. VowU' -ro = 3( )('-k. )( 4 2,682.) = 12 $co c.F. - 'TEO ID RATE of Ag5oeET►o4 _ f+s gCo cFM 64)(Oo) - 7RENG>1 ,A3 g7)01J GAPA C r 7'� (G4o )(p,o/24) - Cip, &96v 69. 016e }' S. 3 58 pIL nn 1V " PROJECT .T.P. pNASE 2 - - - - - PREPARED BY DATE c}.. 21 .9 tr, JOB NO. ct 5 09 50 PAGE NO. 3 or 3 ____. '._ __ ■ 1 ■■ ■■■■■�■■■■■ = ._ • •••••• 11 _ I g � G- `- and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784*Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 September 14, 1995 Mr. Stan LeSieur Deputy General Manager Unified Sewerage Agency 155 North 1st Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Re: Castile Project 8100 & 8170 S. W. Durham Road Tigard, Oregon Tax Lots - 400 & 500 Tax Map - 2S 1 12CC Dear Mr. LeSieur: Our firm is involved with a project in Tigard which abuts the Unified Sewerage Agencies Tigard facility. Our client is developing approximately 2.32 acres into a small Industrial Park. The two tax lots presently consist of two residences and a stocking yard for a landscaping business. The City of Tigard does not provide storm sewer services to the site at this time, therefore we are requesting to connect to an existing storm sewer line located in Schaffer Avenue. The storm sewer line is a private line owned by the Tigard/Tualatin School District with the approval of U.S.A. We have obtained permission from the school district to connect to this line and have provided documents to Mr. Chuck Spear at your agency for the creation of the easement agreement for this line which will need to cross a small portion of U.S.A. 's property. (See enclosed documents) . The Castiles, owners of the property, understand that by connecting to the school district's private line that all agreements and conditions placed on the school district by U.S.A. apply to their project. Mr. Stan LeSieur Unified Sewerage Agency September 14, 1995 Page 2 Please review this request and let me know if any further documents, agreements, etc. are required. Sincerely, -- James D. Andrews, Project Manager JDA:mlh I .-`• ' I/ ,i. I ,...- t• 7 1 4 A . • • _._ '11-7 • . "1, p ppp 0110K WINMPOO II c .13 11111116.6e g I ''‘A,,.‘k%,S's, \•\. ..''\ t ! , t b I : ,l‘kW, ,•A 's 4 t Z 4 ::, 1 , .s.,„ ',.:t.. ... , ‘ ',„.4 , ,,, ! . „:,..\\ !I ,:,;.,„ ,. 1 . ,,,,‘, k• li N..\ i 1 1 i..,. ,..... ,,,, .1: ..\ ... ., • ..! . t : = ..,„, (I I) •- -:- 1 — _ —_ I ■ .-' I i I 11 :=1 '\\\\ .71: 1 LI I--- . 1 •r,1:1 0- .7:-.—. zr--. i• , ,...-,.. .I _ .... z h --„ :71, — — ir , / ' — I. 1 ; 6 4 _ I I 190 I 1-9LH 1 e : 1.-- _ — • .I ( — 0 1 1 1 ii195011 I i 1 I ... l , .,..,-,•.‘a, \ \-,-,\..\...: , ‘, '', \' s'. ' s , '..,3..: . \ 1 i ..... ..... .. .. ^I. ''.1•_..' --S.W;SHAFFER RD. ----- ---- ■ i _ 16\ ■ -_-E c ....‘ q t i I Fol t. .. ... .,, ..... a if 1 , u iiti..1 I > ... 1 II 1 x !if i SCIIMIDT SANITARY SERVICE, INC. 8325 S.W. Ross St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Phone 639-2378 Solid Waste Disposal. Recycling, and Drop Box Service Established In 1048 /1/1‘) g/ , /g495 ci it/icoLt nr 0,71.4dee.,)-3 J j „s_1;444--- , pl A „e20-4/14,-44.--k-GX•4 /--teft- 7 (LA gfrY7/41 „Yea 44— ,cutio/ 7Z) /a/1106"-aa es-e&_,L44.40-t-42-- , ,44-14-46- 40te/teder_pt 414 eir4X- amt a�� 4 a.-a '4./Q.1. Aar- ‘77/04/1.- _ //‘44j--- /// I Ct S.U.J. DURI-I 1 ROAD 7 r -2..,-- IAN 1.0i 401 � Ifli'.i11f1111.I111i 1 17 k LL__... IJ r7L1LI1IIL \Ii' • c 1 i ii i-..• i ; 1 4 4 4 III 1 Ii I jj " � I 1 Li t 4, , i 1 ..`, /•--.. 1 I I ' — � l' r i .11 • - I' o I • I ./ --;. .[_.. q � I ~`r Id 3 I I I a4 I;, ,.... 1 ik! ,J, : i jr 6 1 hi a I 71 • li . ii` I I i) 1 iii �� I CC r _ i I ' . F I �o 1 4: I 0 • N V - 1 ;, I f l 'I I I i' i I I it i II , - I.1;CC C,Am CA NO ON ■ P RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 28as HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists in the care and CONSULTANTS preservation of trees" David Halstead. Consultant B July 26, 1996 • P O Box 1182,Tualatin,OR 97062 Phone 1503)245.1383 ATTN.: Mr. Jim Castile S & L Landscape Inc. 8100 SW Durham Road y Tigard, OR 97224 Reference: Durham Industrial Park Location: 8170 SW Durham Road Subject: Tree & Site Inspection Comments .i• 1 . I have inspected the site and reviewed the tree preservation report I • I authored dated 2/25/96 pertaining to this site. I have found preservation measures pertaining to this project to be in compliance with the report. veto {•� I am available and on call for the duration of this project as needed. I will be inspecting the site again in September. If further information is needed please call. f Sincerely, G 4.1,4 '�� Phillip Whitcomb Certified Arborist ISA/PNW #0114 f, 'I April 7, 1997 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Nicoli Engineering & Construction Services, Inc. Attention: Jim Andrews, Project Manager 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Minor Modification to Phases I and II of the Durham Industrial Park Dear Jim: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification to the Durham Industrial Park at 8100-8170 SW Durham Road. The requested modification was to add a 2,000 square foot building primarily to be used for storage purposes. The proposed floor plan was to provide approximately 1,200 square feet of storage and an additional 800 square feet of restroom and office space. The Director has approved of this expansion based on the findings provided in your letter dated March 18, 1997, and the related construction plans. Please provide a copy of this letter with your application for Building Permits and feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, 7/4(ya4 CtV6f-e/t Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP I ICURPLNWIARK RIDURHAM.DOC c: SDR 96-0008 land use file SDR 95-0001 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 T. 11 . ak and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 March 18, 1997 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard-Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Durham Industrial Park-Phase 2 SDR-96-0008, SIT 96-0022 Job#95-0930 Dear Mr. Roberts: The developers (Jim&Audrey Castile)are requesting to construct an additional building (Building E) in the"landscape island"at the center of the site. The Castile's are requesting that this additional structure be approved as a minor modification. The majority of the structure will be utilized as a storage area for the tenants of the development. The 600 square foot room at the north end of the building will be leased. The exact use is unknown at this time, but it is assumed that it will be leased as office space or as a conference room for the on site tenants. The remaining landscaped area on site still meets the required percentage. Additional shrubs/trees have been added to the project at the north of the proposed building(see sheet 1.2.) Parking will generally remain as originally approved,except for the addition of another disabled parking space adjacent to the building(see sheet 1.1.) a new stripped access pathway has been added to the project to connect the new building to the existing pathway system. Mark Roberts-Planning Department Durham Industrial Park Phase 2 March 18, 1997 Page 2 If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA;jh enclosures l ' ;gang Ci CO raiz■To oM Penn.; 0, 0 '4 ,IUP1r!a i N CV ro k dia i1 En (I) rn co cn MINIM L 0 ►!12 I1Irii1 co 1,) ago 0 0 t��lliiil- c h c .� ••UIlie 7 O N Q, ninon ��!1 � 00 o m En o UA HILI-DUEUIEHAL ���� o ii CcI�,o PROFC,(�` \3 �G 1 N FF A. / PHASH, � . w 11135 OREGON / �4Y 17,Age ' v�MFS R.CI\rte Q I EXPIRES: - di TABLE OF CONTENTS eau.aueWArM ROAD +� 6 SITE ftP NICOLI ENGINEERING �[ TIGARD C sw.SHARER ° AL' �c 0.1 GENERAL INFORMATION CC H s� OOL usa1" 0.2 GENERAL INFORMATION W TREAThE NT 1.1 SITE PLAN a_ PLANT 1.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN a 13 GRADING PLAN J Z NORTH 1.4 FACILITY PLAN VICINITY MAP 2.1 FLOOR PLAN Q i 3.1 ELEVATIONS a J Qcn Z Cr5 CS. CO W °° < < I I CC C.. w BUILDING F DATE: 3•I��q� 8198 SW. DURHAM ROAD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 DRN BY: CHK'D BY: JDA JDA JOB #: 950930 PLANNING SUBMITTAL DWG #: ECOVER -- MINOR MODIFICATION 0.1 311S3 04'6056 LAS ear # 0M0 4# aor :A8 OHO A8 N?O :31va )I JVd 1VIELLSflaNI VWHEJfla 1bumens ONINNb1d 1] cI ? O 3 co 929c—'?u9 0 990Z-0Z9 uo6aap'pJo6il N W co '}S Ja}ua0'M'S SZ06 O 3 0 0 0 In c () 0 w CD C) (D to 7 Il7I Iii 1•111/51! •%i•ii 12111110 ImINNt I!!iP!\ •4 " .:puss ! EE! (O!VOW19 CC'17YdW07 f''714 C) 933Vd9 6C viirso Vd 993iicav 'MI LMii#W 11C RI�i 005 'ON 1O1)VL 9911 1 9C ON.IVW XVl ('s51C) 'd9 f'f9CC1 Y3i!(V O3dY9901V1 (tC40) '39 VC9e4C 37Vdt1(q onoinai3.K11 (%YCC) '49(IIV 9'JWO11013 (tool) '39 01914 3119 V l V 0 3 1 1 9 .0-AC • .I Nt1d 3115 1VOIl7(11119NO9 6104 03A0ii•dV N330 3.VM ONV 1II.Rl3d 1!16.4 031111.1x19 N330 3AVM O ONV 10'3'9 1/9v1 1C11fl9 [COO-96119"ON 111034 CI NV 9000-96-i1ci 1G 03ADi1ddY 9V1T 114314.I0i3■30 3119 311 -a4vi-edna 11T9 9614)1.1140.3.914011(161 a16.I 91 NOI1Y71101.0.91141 931ON 1Y1i3N3O 39Yd9 10NOIDD'd 3101993700 NVA illUIIIIllhIilIlIUIIIHhILiJIUIHhIHI-IIIIIIIIIIIHIIIHI HhNIIIllCiiiIOIWjjIIIIIIIIOUfflhIIIflHIOI ♦ % ;IRYlritii• /////, I -+j 3yVi1019 I .NYDIO. 1 3611 1. - (O390010e1d) 371910 01.L.1Vil kg." \ 1,4 &Ai q 1111111 Illl I I!II!:��I!I!IIIIIIIII III 1 11111 III: k u 1111111111111111 11111111111111109H11111111111111111111 '.I1.1-V3iIV 03dV990NV1- • U LLLLLL n 0 ter■■■■■■■■■i■■/�� O 1 39914 . 4 DI3i I 13A3C 3119 . -.9 0-.001 ( DiflaL193 .o-0001 Q 111111 ///////rriam_ f� 1 3 P --9 .0-.991 1000-91'9'1VAOi1.i.Jq M3IA3li 1N31.14013A30 3119 aid 034073/30 N330 9Th(031900)3119 ail 1.D NOII:IO• 91111 .01-.4[ .0-.41 — -- 4 Sll1 D11RNAM ROAD– -—- - i 0 - s loo ,..._o. i 212,10111:1e 011111 - - jar 1 i \ a Mir: 0 0 I . 1§ii r O - f 11 F F I 111111, .,: f. 7 r a zaab ; " iihi • .,„, . ISM;411.-4' • r= ® 1 /M I D r--- %'� I �j — i I®i---- icA 0 . 1t1i!, _y ---- -: I tiJ I m - ' I 1 ®r=—_— y 1 — �Ji---- r I - 1 r - . 1 y s1111110 1- =T =n==0- w A. to - - I D 9 4g1 0:g ir b lg. ixi z )40 I _ o $ Qr ° 1111111 j ¢ li .. _ � p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 R{ 1111111 m Trri s�� �� Sr I I I II I I$III 1111111 , DO � rr oo ' 1 ll l ll_ �11LL S II \ \ m r PO) O,._ _ t ,.. 1 7i; ii i ! 6i 0 $g D f- — 1 a 5111 54tH FER ROAD z 6 ° L '' ° ° PROJECT: PLANNING SUBMITTAL n��i�nanni��l c',, o co m m ,��iJ./ k 1\'11X0.1•11.%111'.1 WIPMIS!IIMlV�1 DURHAM INDUSTRIAL PARK a` `r�' -61111 iy■►•�Iiiiiii1i■►•I11h i�lr1■iilfii�i�llii�rl m 4^c, O and Construction Services Inc. j\1 71 om - z !025 S.W. Center St. tv , PHASE II BUILDING E w - Oz -_C- Box 23784 Z w 8198 S.W. DURHAM RD. I g �'o-(1 _aO�'' Tigard, Oregon 97223 LC) a TIGARD, OREGON 97224 l r' Phone: (503) 620-2086 - Fax: (503) 684-3636 rn o D I I _ l._— I na' - - - — 1 sill. ROAD — — 4- ri3i • � R4 '—! - Rt'— .1. !lii!IiIrii': I!9E _j 169'--y , ■ \` :1 AIM 1 111111■■�j' r-i ri x,0041 r7 if1 ri 'lk s'fr j- - >‘,.4 gi, .. NN 1 MINIM MINER: n g S t NORTH I . i -- qt- 1 R rl `\ r. --- es. � Z MINOIMIN Try sil OM COI 1:g p y ^ �1 iii' p(' u m- P� r LT// i �_ I'M r r- O X D , Now IN= I IWIS MB ; z .Z o -u , ��'� �II� L--- ro ❑` 01 i qq 165'\ =m G� i' .c ------\............._______ 1 Ih A ; ■INE -ma I ; N6.--■i■no ' ., . 164' 1 == if 163' ==MINIM; .�III_: ;ZEIrLi c ao N) ■■`UI;i 0 L) N re)�i•_.r to U O ,F iurrRi cV N 00 c!r4rA• o y 00 ° 0 ■∎!Iii:: C N c ,. 1•11111011 : 0 N rr_.�I+l�! 3 X o,,,r,.. ■jo n 'ia cJ IrJ °' II '.. O c EXISTING SANIYARY SELLER LINE- y EXISTING BURIED PIPE-�I EXISTING HANHOLE ' I6-''O 0 O 0 0 D•TRENCH PER PHASE 1 I I WA6 STUBBED TO THE 617E(PM4ASE 2) "q — _ — — O C) O I- O l� DURING PHASE I DEVELOPMENT. THE LINE °) I I GY SD. WILL BE EXTENDED TO PHIASE 2 AND I I-I'I- - }l ' f%iVIDE SERVICE TO THE DEV£LOPIIENT. I i i — — — _ O PROF STORM 6EILER LINE �C / EXI6TMG I IR"WATER SERVICE EXISTIG FIRE HYDRANT LINE I EASETMENT!PHASE ONE) r'� G 1 N .T rt METALLED PER PHASE I INSTAL ED PER PHASE I I�OVERFLOE LINE �; lrwu,eE oNEJ eLINE OUTSIDE ..�/.' �` i i 1, �l 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I ((PHASE FIRE HYDRANT I OF LINE FOR CLARITY 3 .4 a T�1 L J/////V/ EEELLELa fL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 u I c__nq_..__m N OFpRgWpy�, s". ��1 1 1 1 1 I I I i1, I I I I C__�IC_-7 '�11 i L_LJ_1_L_LJ_J L_LJ_1_1-LIJ_-J. �', __�V__� • `�� ' ' - - 4 — — — I t l'f l _�� OREGO ■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJUllll NEW RAM ,A '_°" ��, ,, 1ga1 ■■:■■■■■■■■■�`. ■ 11 ''1 DRAM LNE ✓ �a �� ..,......,�IIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIfiufiii;L IuIuIIIIIIIIIliI irI PI;I 4'°" ��FS R.'10-,mom• ■GD. 3Y SD , •L I 'PROf;O6ED BURIED PIPE TRENCH 11=, I • S.D°5 150 LE) �• IN--EXISTING FIRE HYD-• _ Ilk✓ SEE 2/C2.1 (PHASE I) ;; I • 111 S =s�= III ( EXPIRES: 12-31-98 I q WATER LNE TO PHASE 2 w II IN ■ I S,- vFROM LINE INSTALLED —2— II ■1 ■ .i FROM PHASE I v 11 1 ■1 ■ -�- ■ CZ. c — II i , 1 In MI • II/ g=- II RI I Alb. .� s J91. M MI • a �—. 4•♦SD 6 SD S•�03 (122 LE) 1°•�6D 6•D7 f146 LFJ lII• 1365 LE) ,_ }�� •M r •• • \TOY L .AT TR-7JCH I ■I I • n g 1 BUILDNG a IBM IL ICI I CI 11 12' ,L NM CC I 111 41) in��� • IIIIIIIIII _ II1111TH _ II ■1 GD q II o 1 MI C.O.o — — 111h11111 — — _. G.O. C . -{ ca I C.B.2 DOUNSpOUT-TYP. 1 a 1 I RIM•1i1�6' RM•164LO' 7 3i NV..166f44' NV.•16300' V-05-..,104-3'-0` ` N_ t� I !3 4 Q ^ I I I— Q 1 1—I Cr)cn m C J 1- = O W i OD FACILITIES PLAN = m ° f � I^ • 'O' co W �� c0/— EL 1 < < I I CC a. D ~- o G R A D I N G , F A C I L I T Y N O T E S W CC 0 I. PORTION6 OF THE PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT FOR PHASE 2 WILL OCCUR 3. THE ApPLIC.ANT WILL C0'NECT TO AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE DATE: 3 i 14.1-7 (APPROXIMATELY)DURING THE LATE&lt•ER OF Ism,. PHASE 2 WILL WHICH WAS STUBBED TO THE PHASE 2 PORTION OF THE SITE DURING BE DEVELOPED N SUB-PHASES AS tI-E ECO OMICA OF THE DEVELOPMENT ALLOW. ALL PROVMETTTB WILL BE IMPLEMENTED A6 NOTED ON THE CITY THE R"IPROYFIENT6 OF PHASE I. M APPROVED DRAWINGS AS THE PI-IASP SEQUENCES ALLOW. DRN BY: JDA IN 4 CHK'D BY: nSET DOCUMENTS AND OBTANING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS. JOB #: 95O9.iO � 2. ALL STORM SELLER LINES SHALL BE SC4-EDULE 4°ABS DWV OR SO-IEDULE THE PLI!'1dI cGNTRACTOR IS RESPONGIBLE FOR PRONDMG THE NECESSARY 40 PVC DUN DWG #: EFACILI-[Y 1.4 ::.lii+i o WI a co y - -- N' ' o �� ��S O� 4 MK _ y Pa PI 1 T r ,�IIZU L 4 o rK o MK N o %l1\111=II c L Co' l i al-AR RGOIt A•ACZ memo" U M O v v CO E 04.61-ED AIWA 1 I TOILET PAPER �,•�-� U N a' ? N r m v m'Elio Ls)L *i-0 N O O O X___ - , ao "i — w • R O 01 O_ d • 6 e 'R■-' '& T7/4,C:Cti") . 'M. 10.112C atAw/NCe n tst TOE CLEAWCE `-? �C F DBMN �� 111 ,A (A) Bran 1tI.M Alb logs dr_axmce (A) WOK HALL eNi &DE WALL , OREGON DISABLED RESTROOM DETAILS ii,9�<Y17.� ' N.T.S. ISR.N\cP/ i 100'-0" I EXPIRES. 12-31-913_j — i 60'-0" 40'-0" 9'-8" NON-BEARING WALL NON-BEARING WALL t ONE HOUR WALL 2x4 AT 24" O.G WI 413" 2x4 AT 24" OG. WI " /1G - . EACH SIDE GYPBD. EACH SIDE Ne ZD cli I ® � V C I a v 9 .r I 0,1 -= W c0 0 ♦R _ \ OFFICE/GON>' aa1F m in STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE v 30'x20' x 20'x20' 10k20' 10'x20' 10'x20' 10'x20' Z a 3 68 GRAB BARS - 0 ° N r` 9 ` IEEE DETAILS) i J ' cs, - 0 � o 8 `l al NON-BEARING WALL D m o w in 9 2x4 AT 24" O.G. WI NB" 0 3 0 cil GYPBD. EACH BIDE Z =i1 i 3010 — co Q (3068 3068 c In o P .1 A < , \ ' (i---"-1 40x30 SL I 1 40x30 SL 40x30 8L 40x30 SL 40x30 SL 40x30 SL +�x8 DOOR B'x8' DOOR 8'x8' DOOR ° 8'x8' DOOR �' I I 3'-8" I1'-0" f 9i0 1/2" 9'-0 1/2" 9'-0 1/2" r 9'-0 1/2" 4'-6" \e------2'-9 1/2" j 0-- ,, '-4 1/2"13'-8" I I I o C) L_, 0 0 © © ED 411 6 ca_ DATE: 3-14-a-1 7 DRN BY: SP N FLOOR PLAN 1 I WALLS PER MANUFACTURED CHK'D BY: JDA 0 R 1/8„ = I -0„ BUILDING SUPPLIER (SUNWARD) JOB #: 950930 T N _ WALLS PER TENANT IMPROVEMENTS DWG #: EFLOOR — 2.1 —1!! U c0 c0 20'-0" 2 -0 'I ___r4I N N 111111121 N N 00 2'-0" 20'-0u S -0" .._.•_� (n Obi tO tf� i. y 3 12!Jr*i o 13 ,1 ° E 12 i--j N 3 x O S (n O m RIBBED METAL o :..:: 1 N (3',E O x SIDING (TYP.) c .Q' r o ice/ .., �/ i� /,. G l N F ` 0 — 30 I(CJ �� _------- --- '' OREGON/ NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION ✓�`Y" ,g�1 �� ' SR.N\CP 1/8" = I'-0" 1/8" = I'-0" I EXPIRES: 12-31-98 1 CC Q W a- ('3 i J z < Q o - EAST ELEVATION CC J 1/8" = 11-0" � m zo RIBBED METAL RIBBED METAL ° CC 7,----- ROOF PANELS SIDING (TYP.) 0 z = `� ° cx W Q cD 111 111 JUL _ _ = 0 ., ice/ '.�i/ �/ f� ./ ��/ ;i, �/ Q > n _� U W w cD cD EMI -N- 3 . SIDEWALK- RAMP TO OFFICE (4) 8' x 8' — RAMP TO STORAGE DATE. - 11- 1-1 DRN BY: PSP OVERHEAD DOORS (TYP.) AREAS JDA JOB 950 WEST ELEVATION 'D BY:JOB #: 950930 1/8 r-m DWG #: EELEV 3.1