Loading...
SDR1996-00002 SDR96 - 00002 HILLVIEW TERRACE II ADDITION CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II ADDITION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: HILLVIEW TERRACE II ADDITION Site Development Review SDR 96-0002 Lot Line Adjustment MIS 96-0001 PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow the development of 36 apartment units to be added to the 90 unit apartment complex which is currently under construction. The applicant also requested to relocate the previously approved community recreation building to an adjoining property which is presently developed with a single family residence. The applicant has also requested approval for a Lot Line Adjustment to add 1.33 acres to the existing 3.65 acre site. APPLICANT: Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Same ZONING DESIGNATION: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The Medium-High Density Residential Zoning District permits the provision of low to medium rise, multiple family residential development. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lots 1200. 1300 and 1400). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18,116, 18.120 18.150 and 18.164. II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 1 Conditions of Approval PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from Washington County to construct a half-street improvement in Bull Mountain Road adjacent to the frontage of this site. 2. The applicant shall dedicate additional ROW in Bull Mountain Road to provide a total of 45 feet from centerline. The applicant shall coordinate with Washington County for this dedication. 3. The construction plans shall demonstrate that the proposed public sanitary sewer manholes will be located within areas accessible to City maintenance vehicles. 4. The applicant shall dedicate a public sanitary sewer and vehicle access easement to the City for the proposed public sanitary sewer line extension. 5. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 6. The applicant's plan shall provide sanitary sewer service to the undeveloped parcel to the west of this project. 7. The applicant shall submit storm water calculations to ODOT and the City for review and approval regarding the proposed detention pond. 8. The applicant shall submit water quality calculations to the City demonstrating the proposed pond will meet the criteria of USA R&O 91-47. 9. The applicant shall pay a water quantity fee as established by USA R&O 91-47. 10. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 2 12. The applicant sha,, provide a hydrology and hydraulk. study to describe the adequacy of the proposed system relating to the requirements for both water quality and quantity. The storm drainage system shall provide for both summer and winter storm conditions. The study shall determine how the on-site storm drainage system can serve the undeveloped property to the west and any other parcel within the immediate drainage basin. Staff suggests the applicant provide one analysis to consider both the Hillview Commons project and this proposed addition. 13. Revised site/landscape plans and permits shall be submitted for review and approval. Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. Provide a copy of the site plan for review and approval by the authorized franchised waste hauler. b. The applicant shall provide details concerning the required screening of the proposed swimming pool. c. The applicant shall provide site improvements, an access easement and a joint maintenance agreement to allow access from at least one point to the proposed driveway along the westerly property line. a. An arborist report shall be provided and those trees which are presently in excess of 12 inches in diameter and in good health which are proposed to be removes shall be mitigated on an inch for caliper inch basis throughout the site. Trees may alsc be mitigated on another site elsewhere or a fee shall be paid where it is not feasible to locate replacement trees elsewhere. e. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 1= The applicant shall construct half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Bull Mountain Road to Washington County standards. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. Additional pavement to provide 22 feet from curb to centerline. b. Curb and gutter. c. Storm drainage improve~--nts, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff. d. Street striping to provide required travel fares and bike lane. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 93-0001 /IEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 3 e. A six foot concrete sidewalk including driveway apron. f. Streetlights as determined by the County. g. Underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in- lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: In 1992 and 1994 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District designations for these properties were amended from Commercial Professional (C-P) to Medium-High Density Residential R-25). In 1995, Site Development Review 95-0006 was approved for a portion of the subject property to allow 90 apartment units. Vicinity Information: The site has frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road and is adjoined by a vacant restaurant to the east, the Wellington Condominiums to the south. A vacant multiple-family residentially zoned property adjoins the site immediately to the west. The site is also adjoined by residential uses and a church on the north side of SW Bull Mountain Road. Site Information and Proposal Description: The portion of the site which is to be redeveloped with a recreation building contains the existing residence. The remainder of the site is presently vacant. The site slopes towards SW Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Highway. The portion of the site which is proposed to be developed with the apartments units had contained a thick undergrowth of brush with several scattered trees. The portion of the site to be redeveloped with a community recreation center use is presently developed with a single family residence. The applicant recently cleared the brush. IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: Section 18.56 (R-25 Zoning District) allows multiple family residential dwelling units as a permitted use. The applicant is proposing to add two apartment buildings with 36 units to an approved twelve building, 90 unit, apartment complex. The applicant is also proposing to relocate the previously approved community recreation building to an adjoining property. Recreational facilities are a required amenity of a multiple family residential use. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002JMIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 4 Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.56.050 states that the minimum lot area for each multi-family unit in the R-25 zoning district is 1,480 square feet. There is no minimum lot width requirement in the R-25 zone. The minimum lot area calculations as it relates to overall project density is reviewed below. New development within the R-25 zone is required to provide a minimum of 20% landscaping. The applicant provided preliminary calculations which indicate that 50% of the site is to be developed with landscaping in satisfaction with this requirement. Setbacks: Section 18.56.050 states that for multi-family dwellings the setbacks are as follows: front yard - 20 feet; side yard - 10 feet; side yard which abuts a more restrictive zone - 30 feet; rear yard - 20 feet. As indicated on the site plan, the proposal complies with the setback requirements. The maximum building height of this zoning district is 45 feet. As shown on the exterior elevation plans the proposed buildings would be approximately 36 feet in height which is under the maximum allowed. Density Computation: Section 18.92 establishes the criteria for determining the number of dwelling units permitted. In determining the net acreage, the following are subtracted from the gross acreage: sensitive land area; park dedication; dedicated public right-of-way and private streets. To calculate the net units per acre, it is necessary to divide the net acreage by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot by the applicable zoning district. No sensitive lands are found to be present on this site. The required deduction from this property is 15% of the gross site area. The gross acreage of the previously approved Hillview Terrace site is 3.65 acres. The site of the existing residence which is to be added to the property for community recreational use is .35 acres. The area to be added for the additional 36 apartment units is 1.33 acres. This equals a gross of 5.33 acres. From the gross area 15% or .79 acres is taken out for pubic facilities which leaves a net of 4.54 acres. The net area equals 197,762 square feet which is then divided by the minimum lot size of the zoning district which is 1,480 square feet. Through this calculation the site yields the opportunity for 133 dwelling units. The applicant has proposed 126 total dwelling units and is, therefore, in compliance with the density standards. Additional Yard Setback Requirements:. Section 18.96.020 requires that the building setback on SW Bull Mountain Road (a Major Collector) shall be the setback distance required by the zoning district plus 30 feet measured from the centerline of the street. The closest adjoining structure is beyond 45 feet from the centerline of the street which complies with the standard. Distance Between Multiple-Family Structures: Section 18.96.030 states that buildings with windowed walls facing buildings with windowed walls shall have a 25 foot separation, buildings with windowed walls facing buildings with a blank wall shall have a 15 foot separation, buildings with opposing blank walls shall have a 10 foot separation. Where buildings exceed a horizontal dimension of 60 feet or exceed 30 feet in height, the minimum wall separation shall be one foot for each 15 NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002JMIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 5 feet of building length over 50 feet and two feet for each 10 feet of building height over 30 feet. This section is applicable to the proposed buildings. The building lengths are approximately 135 feet in length. The building elevation plans show that the proposed buildings would have blank walls facing blank walls. The required separation is therefore 10 feet. The separation between the proposed buildings and the approved buildings is in compliance with this section. Driveways, parking lots and walkways shall maintain the following separation for dwelling units within eight feet of the ground level: 1) driveways and parking lots shall be separated from windowed walls by at least eight feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structures shall be separated by at least five feet; and 2) driveways and parking lots shall be separated from living room windows by at least 10 feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structure shall be separated by at least seven feet. As indicated on the site plan, all buildings satisfy the parking lot and walkway separation requirements. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. The landscape plan provides 50% of the site with landscaping. Parking lot trees have been provided in excess of the minimum ratio of one space for each seven uncovered parking spaces in compliance with this requirement. Street Trees: Section 18.100 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The landscape plan provides four Scarlett Oaks which would match and be added to other street trees which were previously approved for portions of the development which has frontage along SW Bull Mountain Road. Based on their size of 60-80 feet at maturity these trees are considered a large species and may be planted at 40 feet on center. The landscape plan provides these trees at a spacing of 34 feet. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) states that trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. As indicated on the site plan, parking lot trees and landscaping have been located in accordance with this section. Screening of Swimming Pools: Section 18.100.110(C) states that all swimming pools shall be enclosed as required by Chapter 14.20 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The enclosure shall be provided by a fence or wall with a minimum height of four foot with a self-latching door or gate. The applicant shall provide details concerning the required screening of the proposed swimming pool. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002JMIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 6 Screening of Refuse C. ..ainers: Section 18.100.110(D) .rtes that any refuse container or disposal area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. The site plan as proposed provides two additional trash and recycling enclosures. A fence plan was provided for this purpose. The fence plan complies with the development standards as proposed. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. Obstructions which may be located in this area shall be clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The proposed site improvements comply with these requirements. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(A)(3) requires a minimum of 1.5 parking spaces for 1 bedroom units and 2 spaces for units with more than 1 bedroom. For the entire development the applicant is proposing 71, one bedroom units and 55 units in excess of one bedroom which requires a total of 217 parking spaces. Section 18.106.020(G) states that multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide or the use of all of the guests of all of the residents of the complex The shared parking shall consist of 15 percent of the total required parking spaces and be centrally located within the development. Based on the total number of required parking spaces, a minimum of 33 visitor parking spaces shall also be provided. Therefore, a total of 250 parking spaces are required. The applicant has provided a total of 255 parking spaces, either covered or uncovered, in satisfaction of this require ment. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that the overall site plan provide seven disabled parking spaces if 201 to 300 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides seven disabled person parking spaces in compliance with this requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Based on the requirement for 250 parking spaces for the entire complex a minimum of 16 bicycle parking spaces are required. The site plan shows the provision of approximately 16 bicycle racks, thereby, satisfying this requirement. It is suggested that one bicycle rack which is currently proposed to be located along SW Bull Mountain Road be relocated to an area adjoining the community recreation building. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 7 Walkways: Section 18.108.050(B) requires that within multi-family developments each residential dwelling shall be connected to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities shall be connected by a walkway system having a minimum width of four feet and constructed of an all weather material. As indicated on the site plan, an integrated system of walkways is proposed which is found to be in compliance with these requirements. Access: Section 18.108.070(D) requires that multiple-family residential uses provide a minimum of two driveways plus one additional driveway to a public street for every 200 units or portion thereof in excess of 100 units. The minimum access width shall be 30 feet, with 24 feet of pavement, curbs and a five foot sidewalk. The site plan indicates the provision of 126 units total therefore a minimum of two driveways are required for this development. This requirement is satisfied as the site plan shows the provision of two access drives with pavement widths of a minimum of 24 feet with walkways having been provided along both driveways leading into the site. Director's Authority to Restrict or Coordinate Access: Section 18.108.110 allows the Director to provide for increased traffic movement on streets by restricting or eliminating driveways on streets. The site is adjoined by vacant multiple family residential property to the west which has the development potential to require two new driveways to SW Bull Mountain Road. The applicant shall provide site improvements, an access easement and a joint maintenance agreement to allow access from at least one point to the proposed driveway along the westerly property line. Signs: Section 18.114.130 (B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the R-25 zone. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Services Technicians. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off. The applicant has proposed two additional such facilities. The applicant shall obtain approval from the hauler for the location and compatibility of the proposed facilities with the service vehicles. Site Development Review: Section 18.120 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal is consistent with these sections has been reviewed elsewhere. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Sections 18.94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations), 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), 18.134 (Variance), 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These sections are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.A.2-18 provides other Site Development Review NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 8 approval standards not ri,..,assarily covered by the provisions the previously listed sections. Section 18.120.180.A.8 is found to be inapplicable because the site does not adjoin the 100-year flood plain. The applicable standards are addressed immediately below. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees and requires that trees having a 12 inch caliper or greater be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The majority of the site does not currently have trees. The portion of the site which is presently developed with a single-family residence which is proposed to be redeveloped for use as a community recreation has several trees proposed to be incorporated into the site. The applicant has not provided an arborist report concerning other trees which are to be removed on this site. An arborist report shall be provided and those trees which are presently in excess of 12 inches in diameter and healthy which are proposed to be removed, shall be mitigated on an inch for caliper inch basis throughout the site. These trees may also be mitigated on another site elsewhere or a fee shall be paid where it is not feasible to locate replacement trees elsewhere. Exterior Elevations: Section 18.120.180.3 states that along the vertical face of multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: a) Recesses (decks, patios, etc.); b) Extensions (decks, patios, etc.); or c) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations. As indicated on the preliminary building elevations plans, the design provides both recesses and roof elevation offsets, in accordance with this section. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria is found to be inapplicable due to the compatibility with existing adjoining uses and the zoning to the proposed use. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. This criteria is addressed because the site and landscape plan provides screening around the parking area adjacent to SW Bull Mountain Road. Privacy and Noise: Section 18.120.180.5 requires that structures which include residential dwelling units shall provide private outdoor areas for each ground floor unit which is screened from view by adjoining units, that the buildings shall be oriented in a manner which protects private spaces on adjoining properties from view and noise, and on-site uses which create noise, lights, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses. A total of three residential parcels directly adjoin the proposed development site. Due to the building orientation, the open space areas appear to be adequately screened from view of existing and potential adjoining residential uses. The patio areas have direct visibility from SW Pacific Highway. The ground floor units have been provided with fencing or masonry walls of complimentary materials to buffer the patio areas from SW Pacific Highway and the existing, or planned, multiple-family residential uses. On-site private space has been satisfied through the use NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 9 of ground floor patios and balconies. The building design also provides for off-sets or staggering of the patios so that a direct line of site between patios is limited. Private Outdoor Areas: Section 18.120.180.6. requires that private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet. This criteria is satisfied as the applicant is proposing balconies or patios for each unit in excess of 48 square feet. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Section 18.120.180.7 states that in addition to subsections 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the amount of 200 square feet per unit for studios to two-bedroom units and 300 square feet per unit for three or more bedroom units. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: 1) all outdoor space; 2) part outdoor and part indoor space; 3) all public or common space; 4) part common and part private, for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room and balconies on each unit; 5) where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable for reasons of crime prevention and safety. This development requires a total of 26,100 square feet of shared outdoor recreation area (117 units @ 200 s.f. and 9 units @ 300 s.f.). A swimming pool has been proposed for on-site shared recreation purposes. The applicant proposes extensive landscaping over 50% of the net lot area or 115,749 square feet with a mixture of walkways, passive enjoyment areas, and common outdoor lawn areas. The larger areas to be provided for the shared outdoor recreation are centrally located and readily observable by the residents of several dwelling units. The Police Department has reviewed the landscape plan and have recommended approval of the plan as proposed. Demarcation of spaces: Crime Prevention: Section 18.120.180.9 states that structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas, semi- public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined in order to establish persons having a right to be in the space, in order to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. The applicant addressed these concerns with the Police Department for the previously approved 90 unit portion of this development. The Police Department had no new concerns regarding this 36 unit addition. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180.10 requires that windows be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that can be observed by others; mail boxes located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; exterior lighting levels selected and angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and light fixtures shall be provided in areas having pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas. Separated laundry areas are not proposed for this development. The Police Department has reviewed this addition and had no new concerns regarding this addition. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 10 Access and Circulation. Jection 18.120.180.11 requires t. _ the City review; a) The number of allowed access points for a development shall be as provided in Section 18.108.070; b.) All circulation patterns within a development shall be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles; and c.) Provisions shall be made for pedestrianways and bicycleways if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan. The Fire District has reviewed this request and had not indicated concerns with the access as shown. Access standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Public Transit: Section 18.120.180.12 requires that the City review; a.) Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; b.) The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (i.) the location of other transit facilities in the area; and (ii.) The size and type of the proposal; c.) The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (I.) Bus stop shelters; (ii.) Turnouts for buses; and (iii.) Connecting paths to the shelters. SW Bull Mountain Road is not presently served by transit. A copy of the proposed development plans have been provided to TRI-Met. The City has not received any comments concerning this proposal. Parking: Section 18.120.180.13 requires that the City review; a.) All parking and loading areas shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sections 18.106.050 and 18.106.090, Chapters 18.102, Visual Clearance, and 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Parking standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaping: Section 18.120.180.14 requires that the City review; a.) All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. b.) In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall, be landscaped; and c.) A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Landscape standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Drainage: Section 18.120.180.15 requires that the City review; a.) All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan. Drainage requirements have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Provision for the Handicapped: Section 18.120.180.16 requires that the City review; a.) All facilities for the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 487. The applicant has addressed these requirements by providing handicapped parking spaces and handicapped accessible dwelling units. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the City will review this development in detail for compliance with the requirements. Signs: Section 18.120.180.17 requires that the City review that all sign placement and construction shall be designed in accordance with requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114. All provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections of this title (e.g., the Planned development, Chapter 18.80.; or a Variance granted under Chapter 18.134; etc.) The applicant has not requested sign permits in conjunction with this application. The applicant can NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002jMIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 11 apply for signage for this development. Sign applications are reviewed by the Development Services Technicians. Underlying Provisions and Regulations of the Underlying Zone: Section 18.120.180.18 requires that the City also review all other underlying requirements of the zoning district. The underlying zoning district requirements are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Tree Removal: Section 18.150 requires that new development preserve existing where possible and requires that trees having in excess of 12 inch caliper or greater be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The majority of the site does not currently have trees. The portion of the site which is presently developed with a single-family residence which is proposed to be redeveloped for use as a community recreation has several trees proposed to be incorporated into the site. The applicant has not provided an arborist report concerning other trees which are to be removed on this site. An arborist report shall be provided and those trees which are presently in excess of 12 inches in diameter and healthy which are proposed to be removed, shall be mitigated on an inch for caliper inch basis throughout the site. Trees may also be mitigated on another site or a fee shall be paid where it is not feasible to locate replacement trees elsewhere. Lot Line Adjustment: Section 18.162.060 contains standards for approval of a lot line adjustment request: 1. An additional parcel is not created by the Lot Line Adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustment is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structure(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; and 3. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district. The criteria 1-3 have been addressed because no structures exist for the subject area. Each resulting parcel will continue to exceed the minimum requirements of the zoning district. In addition to meeting the above standards, a Lot Line Adjustment must also meet the following criteria reviewed under Section 18.162.050 which is applicable to proposed lot line adjustments and lots created through the Minor Land Partition process. 1. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 12 2. Lot Area: The lot . :a shall be as required by the api. ..able zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. 3. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. 4. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. 5. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. 6. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. 7. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. 8. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 9. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 10. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria 1 is satisfied because the R-25 Zoning District does not have an average lot width requirement. Criteria 2 is satisfied as the lot areas would greatly exceed the minimum 1,480 square foot minimum lot size requirement. Criteria 3 is satisfied as the site would have approximately 480 feet of frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road. Criteria 4 is satisfied because all of the proposed improvements will comply with the setback requirements of the R-25 Zoning District as reviewed elsewhere within this report. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 13 Criteria 5 and 6 are not applicable as the existing and proposed newly reconfigured lots are not flag lots. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards, thereby, satisfying Criteria 7. Criteria 8 has been addressed because the larger site to be created through this action is proposed to be developed as one apartment development. Criteria 9 is satisfied because the existing home and the 36 additional dwelling units which have been proposed will use previously approved driveways to SW Bull Mountain Road. Criteria 10 is not applicable as neither parcel is within the floodplain. V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS Engineering Department Comments Findings: Streets: The subject parcel has frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road, which is under Washington County jurisdiction as a major collector street. As part of the Hillview Commons approval, the County performed a Traffic Staff Report, dated October 12, 1995, to identify safety improvements for Bull Mountain Road. The County required the applicant to provide illumination at both the east and west access points into this development. For this proposed addition, no additional traffic safety improvements are required. However, standard County improvements along the additional frontage of Bull Mountain Road are required. These improvements include concrete sidewalk to County standards, any necessary roadway improvements to provide adequate sight distance at the proposed access points and necessary improvements to the existing roadside ditch to provide adequate roadway drainage. The applicant also provided an addendum to the original traffic analysis report, submitted by Robert Keech on February 15, 1995. The addendum is dated February 28, 1996 and indicates that the additional 36 units will not cause any significant impact over that which was identified in the 1995 report. Therefore, the City will not require additional transportation improvements over what was required of the first phase. As part of the Hillview Terrace project. the City required a standard half-street improvement along the Bull Mountain Road frontage that included a left turn refuge for the east driveway. The existing roadway consists of approximately 16 feet of pavement from centerline. The half-street improvement for the new project is proposed to provide additional paving to give 21 feet from centerline per Washington County standards. However, City standard calls for 22 feet of paving in order to allow for a permanent center turn lane in the future and to provide for on-street bike lanes now. The applicant's plan will need to be revised to show that the half-street improvement will provide 22' of paving from curb to centerline. The applicant was allowed to utilize the existing pavement section adjacent to Hillview Commons and simply sawcut and add the additional pavement widening. It is also intended that this same provision will be allowed for this project. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 14 A right-of-way (ROW) c._ ..Ication is also required. The ,sing ROW measures approximately 20 feet from centerline. The applicant dedicated additional ROW to provide 45 feet from centerline as a part of the Hillview Commons project. The current plan for the addition also indicates the applicant will dedicate additional ROW to provide 45 feet from centerline. The applicant shall coordinate with Washington County for the ROW edication. Sanitary Sewer: As part of the Hillview Commons project, the applicant is extending an eight inch public sewer line from the property to the south into this project. The proposed addition will be served by this public line extension. The applicant also intends to extend the public sewer line to the west boundary of the site to provide future service to the adjacent undeveloped parcel. The existing public sewer line will adequately serve this area. Staff is concerned, however, that the applicant has not demonstrated how access will be provided to the City for maintenance of the proposed public sewer line extension. The applicant shall revise the site plan to show how vehicular access to the public manholes will be made available to City maintenance vehicles. Manholes can be loca. d within parking or drive aisles if the applicant provides the proper public sanitary sewer and access easement(s). Storm Drainage: The site slopes to the southeast. It is intended that the storm water from this site will be collected with the storm water from the Hillview Commons project and discharge at the permitted out-fall site at the southern edge of the Hillview Commons site. From that point, the drainage flows toward the existing ODOT frontage road, adjacent to Pacific Highway. Although comments have not yet been received from ODOT, it has been ODOT's policy to require on-site detention of storm water prior to discharging toward an ODOT facility. The applicant is proposing to construct a pond facility that will both detain the 25-year storm event and provide treatment of the lower summer flows. Without calculations, Staff is not able to determine if the pond is sized adequately to handle the 25-year event. Prior to issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall submit storm calculations to both ODOT and the City for review, and approval. The applicant shall submit evidenc that ODOT has approved the proposed detention pond design. The undeveloped parcel to the west of this site should also be accounted for in the applicant's storm drainage system design. A basin analysis should be submitted to the Engineering Department indicating that the applicant's storm drainage conveyance system is sized to handle the surrounding drainage basin. The applicant is not required to size the detention facility for the entire basin, but they must size the piping on the site to accommodate upstream flows. The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75') which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water run-off generated from newly created NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 I-III- .w TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 15 impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency, and method to be used, in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated above, the proposed pond facility is proposed to treat the storm water. VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation reviewed this application and provided the following comments: 1. No access will be permitted to SW Pacific Highway west. 2. Any potential drainage to an ODOT system must be reviewed and approved. On- site detention required. 3. Any work on ODOT right-of-way requires a permit. 4. Street improvements will be required. GTE reviewed this application and stated the developer shall place conduit to GTE's specifications. Unified Sewerage Agency reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: The storm drainage system south of SW Beef Bend Road is inadequate, the developer is required to: a. Install on-site storm water quantify facilities capable of restricting the stormwater discharge to an amount equal to the natural release rate from this site or b. The applicant shall work together with ODOT-USA to provide an adequate down stream conveyance. II. The water quality/quantity facility installed north of Beef Bend Road was not designed to accept the water from this site. a. A water quality facility must be constructed in the development. b. The discharge from the development should not flow through the existing facility. c. City approved detailed erosion control plans should be provided to USA for inspection purposes. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002JMIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 16 Washington County Der..rtment of Land Use and Trans,Jrtation reviewed this application and provided the following written comments and required conditions for access to SW Bull Mountain Road, a County Major Collector: COMMENTS 1. The minimum access spacing standard for SW Bull Mountain Road is 100 feet measured between access points on each side of the road as required by Resolution and Order 86-95 and Section 501-8.5.B of the Community Development code. Access to SW Bull Mountain Road must, therefore, be restricted to meet this spacing standard. The western driveway shall be aligned with SW 114th Avenue. 2. Resolution and Order 86-95 contains minimum sight distance requirements for access to County roads. County Staff was unable to perform a preliminary sight distance review for this project because of the current work load. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide certification from a registered professional engineer that adequate sight distance exists or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements, in both directions, prior to the County permitting access to the County Road. 3. The proposed development exceeds the minimum requirements of Resolution and Order 86-95 for submittal of an Access Report prepared by the applicant. A traffic analysis for this development proposal is being performed by the County Traffic Analyst based on this Report. The Traffic Analyst's findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City at the time of completion of the review. This review and the recommended conditions of approval which will be developed as a part of that review are required by Resolution and Order 86-95 and Section 501-8.2.B of the Community Development Code. REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY THE CITY OF HILLSBORO: A. Submit to Land Development Services (Public Assurance Staff, Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook, 681-3843): 1.) Completed "Design Option" form. 2.) S750.00 Administration Deposit. 3.) Provide preliminary certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer at the access point to SW Bull Mountain Road. Provide a detailed list of what improvements are necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 17 NOTE: Any portion of the Administration Deposit not used by Washington County for plan approval, field inspections, and contract administration will be returned to the applicant. If at any time during the project, the County's costs are higher than the amount deposited, Washington County will bill the applicant the amount needed to cover its costs. 4.) Two (2) sets of complete engineering plans for the construction of the following public improvements: a. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. b. Commercial access to SW Bull Mountain Road to County Standards. c. Improvements within the right-of-way as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance at SW Bull Mountain Road access point. d. Close all existing driveways to SW Bull Mountain Road. e. Any additional off-site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R&O 86-95 upon completion of the County Traffic Analyst's review. f. Provide adequate roadway drainage along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. Clean, grade and shape the ditch. B. Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon completion of the following: 1. Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for the construction of the public improvements listed in conditions I.A.4. NOTE: The Public Assurance staff (Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook 681- 3843) of Land Development Services will send the required forms to the applicant's representative after submittal and approval of the public improvement engineering plans. 2. Provide evidence that the documents required by condition I.C. have been recorded. C. The following documents shall be executed and recorded with Washington County: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-00021MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 18 1. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 37 feet from centerline of SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. 2. Provide a one-foot non-access reserve strip along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, except at approved access points. NOTE: Washington County Survey Division (Jamil Kamawal, 693-4543) will send the required forms to the applicant's representative. II. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: A. The road improvements required in condition I.A.4. above shall be completed and accepted by Washington County. B. Provide certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer, upon completion of necessary improvements. No other comments have been received. VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owners of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MARCH 25, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 19 The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. on March 25, 1996. Questions: If you have questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. b i 3/14/96 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Associate Planner __���� ►' ' �4�� �- 3/14/96 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 20 �...i►�t - - ��- R i : x.10 ..,tom', _ �~ ∎,/ 444, L ��. �' r to a •tiett.t7t,t_s(, ,,,,_„ ! la IP; .. ..1"-74-, ',_?..r-.im...._.."___,-j ct. „„„, ....„,,,, 440(.,.,Aloe 1(4;7 tr* /. j LCLI I i '1 4. IVO / 1 4-. --(45# is At4Iirie. .,'.' Z , ...-/ r 4 1'4. 1-*Vt.' —.47- ______ ammo ; /� AREA PROPOSED '� ��� + �;� Q TO BE ADDED TO THE .��i --- HILLVIEW TERRACE " Oi • . '•,• • E� '; APARTMENTS % , a- / I 6.t$010444 .'V.--- -------- ---- vv --V..:-"":\ % I le- is G *1'4 01 " �� /jam' T�MG .7'- ^40 110.4k ,,,,,/ a/ '1St 1-- Ps a L - `� V_Pecs-. %:...' _ - 210 .ISLE \ **4A-ri!"-- 11- - . ' ti 11"if WM 1111,7,.. 1410/ LL. 1 r r ria ill'. i- 0 I� .D '4' 3 .Q. .„ >. . .. ,- , . , 1 I-- . y .. \ ,, i..... , ... ...... EXIST. eLOG CASE NO. PLOT PLAN SDR 96-0002 EXHIBIT MAP MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENT EXPANSION r I I II I I r ( ,,,[ f---: ihk , _ >4/N. . rialwa A ' ' 1 � ■ ca Q. l a) BUl1MOUNTPINRD V 0 A!: 7 P1:11 r ,, •- nir■ ' Mr* cp/S.W'. t —■►i1 .:4 o• . ..... 4 i is• ‘''-7:I Iii u AV Iii 4'4,4, >1 o` ***0 if inits9 5 U „. ty ow AR 00 0\\s' V 4, 14 r- :•Tei Vicinity Map A SDR 96-0002/MS 96-0001 Note: Map is not to scale Hillview Terrace II Apts. Addition N REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: March 12, 1996 TO: Mark Roberts FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer — RE: SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 Hillview Terrace II Apartments Description: The applicant is requesting approval to add 36 apartment units to a project which was previously approved for 90 units (Hillview Commons). The applicant has also proposed to consolidate an adjacent parcel which contains the common recreation building, and add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. The subject parcel is located at 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (Tax Lot 1400, Tax Map 2S1 10AC), which is south of and adjacent to SW Bull Mountain Road, west of SW Pacific Highway and north of SW Beef Bend Road. Findings: 1. Streets: The subject parcel has frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road, which is under Washington County jurisdiction as a major collector street. As part of the Hillview Commons approval,the County performed a Traffic Staff Report, dated October 12, 1995, to identify safety improvements for Bull Mountain Road. The County required the applicant to provide illumination at both the east and west access points into this development. For this proposed addition, no additional traffic safety improvements are required. However, standard County improvements along the additional frontage of Bull Mountain Road are required. These improvements include concrete sidewalk to County standards, any necessary roadway improvements to provide adequate sight distance at the proposed access points and necessary improvements to the existing roadside ditch to provide adequate roadway drainage. The applicant also provided an addendum to the original traffic analysis report, submitted by Robert Keech on February 15, 1995. The addendum is dated February 28, 1996 and indicates that the additional 36 units will not cause any significant impact over that which was identified in the 1995 report. Therefore, the City will not require additional transportation improvements over what was required of the first phase. As part of the Hillview Commons project, the City required a standard half-street improvement along the Bull Mountain Road frontage that included a left turn refuge for the east driveway. The existing roadway consists of approximately 16 feet of pavement from centerline. The half-street improvement for the new project is proposed to provide additional paving to give 21 feet from centerline per Washington County standards. However, City standard calls for 22 feet of paving in order to allow for a permanent center turn lane in the future and to provide for on-street bike lanes now. The applicant's plan will need to be revised to show that the half-street improvement will provide 22' of paving from curb to centerline. The applicant was allowed to utilize the existing pavement section adjacent to Hillview Commons and simply sawcut and add the additional pavement widening. It is also intended that this same provision will be allowed for this project. A right-of-way (ROW) dedication is also required. The existing ROW measures approximately 20 feet from centerline. The applicant dedicated additional ROW to provide 45 feet from centerline as a part of the Hillview Commons project. The current plan for the addition also indicates the applicant will dedicate additional ROW to provide 45 feet from centerline. The applicant shall coordinate with Washington County for the ROW dedication. 2. Sanitary Sewer: As part of the Hillview Commons project, the applicant is extending an 8-inch public sewer line from the property to the south into this project. The proposed addition will be served by this public line extension. The applicant also intends to extend the public sewer line to the west boundary of the site to provide future service to the adjacent undeveloped parcel. The existing public sewer line will adequately serve this area. Staff is concerned, however, that the applicant has not demonstrated how access will be provided to the City for maintenance of the proposed public sewer line extension. The applicant shall revise the site plan to show how vehicular access to the public manholes will be made available to City maintenance vehicles. Manholes can be located within parking or drive aisles if the applicant provides the proper public sanitary sewer and access easement(s). 3. Storm Drainage: The site slopes to the southeast. It is intended that the storm water from this site will be collected with the storm water from the Hillview Commons project and discharge at the permitted outfall site at the southern edge of the Hillview Commons site. From that point, the drainage flows toward the existing ODOT frontage road adjacent to Pacific Highway. Although comments have not yet ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0002 Hillview Terrace II PAGE 2 been received from ODOT, it has been ODOT's policy to require on-site detention of storm water prior to discharging toward an ODOT facility. The applicant is proposing to construct a pond facility that will both detain the 25-year storm event and provide treatment of the lower summer flows. Without calculations, Staff is not able to determine if the pond is sized adequately to handle the 25-year event. Prior to issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall submit storm calculations to both ODOT and the City for review and approval. The applicant shall submit evidence that ODOT has approved the proposed detention pond design. The undeveloped parcel to the west of this site should also be accounted for in the applicant's storm drainage system design. A basin analysis should be submitted to the Engineering Department indicating that the applicant's storm drainage conveyance system is sized to handle the surrounding drainage basin. The applicant is not required to size the detention facility for the entire basin, but they must size the piping on the site to accommodate upstream flows. The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management(SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition,a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition,the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated above,the proposed pond facility is proposed to treat the storm water. Recommendations: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from Washington County to construct a half-street improvement in Bull Mountain Road adjacent to the frontage of this site. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0002 Hillview Terrace II PAGE 3 2. The applicant shall dedicate additional ROW in Bull Mountain Road to provide a total of 45 feet from centerline. The applicant shall coordinate with Washington County for this dedication. 3. The construction plans shall demonstrate that the proposed public sanitary sewer manholes will be located within areas accessible to City maintenance vehicles. 4. The applicant shall dedicate a public sanitary sewer and vehicle access easement to the City for the proposed public sanitary sewer line extension. 5. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott,Building Division(639- 4171). 6. The applicant's plan shall provide sanitary sewer service to the undeveloped parcel to the west of this project. 7. The applicant shall submit storm water calculations to ODOT and the City for review and approval regarding the proposed detention pond. 8. The applicant shall submit water quality calculations to the City demonstrating the proposed pond will meet the criteria of USA R&O 91-47. 9. The applicant shall pay a water quantity fee as established by USA R&O 91-47. 10. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division (639-4171). 11. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. 12. The applicant shall provide a hydrology and hydraulic study to describe the adequacy of the proposed system relating to the requirements for both water quality and quantity. The storm drainage system shall provide for both summer and winter storm conditions. The study shall determine how the on-site storm drainage system can serve the undeveloped property to the west and any other parcel within the immediate drainage basin. Staff suggests the applicant provide one analysis to consider both the Hillview Commons project and this proposed addition. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0002 Hillview Terrace II PAGE 4 THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OFA CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 13. The applicant shall construct half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Bull Mountain Road to Washington County standards. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. Additional pavement to provide 22 feet from curb to centerline b. curb and gutter c. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff d. street striping to provide required travel lanes and bike lane e. 6 foot concrete sidewalk including driveway apron f. streetlights as determined by the County g. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in- lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) APPROVED: •2 Ids • Gary Alf-.n, Acting City Engineer is\eng\brianr\sdr96-02-.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0002 Hillview Terrace II PAGE 5 FEB-20-'96 09:59 I D:ODOT 2gECEIVED P NNING TEL NO:503-29"- 05B #623 P01 ti FEB 211996. WJG DISTRICT .: 'P FEB 0 mbOF TI ARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1 LI la 0 DATE: January 26, 1996 DE ADE DOM SEC TO: Bob Schmidt_ODOT-Region 1/District 2-A Engineering Coordinator PROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts(X317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 ➢ HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS Q A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18,164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - February 1..1 • You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. if you ate unable to respond by.the above fie, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 1 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. T Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • !Vo d l r.>J //�� ' w e I, k v-P " 1/ + Ire v t l , 1,t,../ / / V V - l(fize rya,tfu fotloun'ng i /on/lotion) Name of Person(s) Commenting: �1.. �9C1?V ei _l I Phone Number{s): z°l-5-QOZ SDR 98-0002/MIS 96.0001.. _ • A H1LLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS n PROPpL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS 2" RECEIVED PLANNING Pt1N Vq o <.(%� FEB 2 6 1996 vvot TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE \*: AND `> BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT GJ 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive• P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526-2469• FAX 526-2538 RF &R ES February 19, 1996 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Hillview Terrace II Apartments 11336 S.W. Bull Mountain road SDR 96-0002 File Number: 602-96 Dear Mark: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations.. This plan review shall become a part of the approved plans and attached thereto. Hydrants shall be placed so that all portions of exterior walls of buildings, measured along the outside and along access roadways, are no more than 500 feet away for private residences or 250 feet for all commercial buildings (up to 500 feet for commercially sprinklered buildings). Location of hydrants and supply piping to said hydrants for water supply, shall be approved by this office. Further, for 20 or more dwelling units, an approved secondary fire department access must be provided. Please resubmit drawings reflecting design changes. Provide details on grade. Review attached. "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives Mark Roberts February 19, 1996 Page 2 If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 526-2469 referring to the above noted file number. Sincerely, ,,A...-ti --.',41,4, Jerry L. Renfro, DFM Plans Examiner JLR:kw Enc. T LATIN VALLEY FIRE AND REST STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINE NUMBER 7.2.8 APPROVED: 04-01-94 SUBJECT: ACCESS ROADWAYS FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND SUBDIVISIONS PURPOSE: A. To standardize requirements for Uniform Fire Code Sections 10.203 and 10.204 where specifics are not given. B. To provide clarification and standardization for Plans Examiners and persons developing and designing access roadways for various commercial and residential structures. AUTHORITY & RESPONSIBILITY: When access is required as prescribed by the Uniform Fire Code, Fire Department staff shall utilize the Uniform Fire Code requirements as amended by the ordinance and the interpretations below for clarification and uniform application. POLICY: A. Section 10.203: Access roadways shall not be closer than 20 feet to a structure unless topographical restrictions dictate the location. B. Section 11L203, Paragraph 2: Two or more accesses to an area shall be required where 20 of more dwelling units are constructed. C. Section 10.204(b): Driving surface may be of any type of material as long as the driving surface is distinguishable from surrounding area and it will carry a load of 50,000 pounds gross weight and 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load). Fire Districts may require plans for roadways and final inspections to be made by State of Oregon Registered Engineer. D. Section 10.204(c): Turning radii shall not be less than'45 feet outside and 25 feet inside using the same center point for both radii. (See Attachment A.) E. Section 10.204(d): Turnarounds shall be: 1. Configured as those shown in Attachment A utilizing the minimum dimensions shown. 2. Level with exception of crowning to prevent accumulation of water on the driving surface. SOG 7.2.8 APPROVED 04-01-94 PAGE 2 OF 2 F. Section 10.204(e): For loading of bridges, see Item C of this Standard Operating Guideline. Bridges shall be designed by a State of Oregon Registered Structural Engineer. Plans shall be stamped by the design engineer. A plan review may be asked for by a second registered engineer at the expense of the owner if desired by the Fire District. Final acceptance inspections shall be made by a State of Oregon Registered Engineer if requested by the Fire District. G. Section 10.204(f): Grades shall not exceed 15% for lengths of over 200 feet without a level place (maximum allowed grade of 5%) for 40 feet in length with a minimum driving surface width not less than 24 feet. Overall average grade of driving systems shall not exceed 10%. APPROVED if.T tin Valley Fire & Rescue erton Fire Department A . W / 1 0 /14-r--- Pit,/(_,p 90' DIAMETER HAMMERHEAD CUL—DE—SAC INSIDE & OUTSIDE TURN RADIUS '-sue-- -r- r- N 1 OI N w N I N -_i -, N O N HAMMERHEAD HAMMERHEAD ALTERNATIVE 1 ALTERNATIVE 2 cz N i_____ Al) O N —∎ N O O N N FIRE MARSHAL APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS REQUIRED . Scale: 1" = 100' ,.r!:•►. TUALArn VALLEY RRE &RESCUE PRIVATE ROAD �'t.A AND END ALTERNATIVES 4.•.., eEAVERroN FIRE DEPARTMENT' DATE CM_13i011331 DRAWN APWA No. WASH.COUNTY NO 8-{6-91 RECEIVED PLANNING At° 121996 FEB v/ CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: January 26, 1996 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)6394171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 ➢ HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - February 8, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the ro osal and have no objections to it. / 6°1\.) p p J Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1,11 ,•� ogle9,Le_ oikA-/11.414- 'A V 04... AWIALE L aL& (4)/.,a-W71 o,�a (o .4141)Tuv ) `one") '°'` '/ et./acld`a'f `a/ add& 0"1asepravide the fo nginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FEB-08 96..09: 10 FROM:14ASHC0 '"ND DEL) SERV 503-681-2906 T^:503 684 7297 PAGE:02/10 RECEIVED PLANNING . l FEB °8 1996e.ITY OF TIOARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: JanuaCY26, 1996 TO: Tom Hark.Washington County Dept. of Land.-use & TranspQrtation FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: ,Mark Roberts AL(111) Phone: (503)639.4171 Fax: (503) 684-1297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS < A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400), The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NE[D YQLR.COMMENTS__BACK .@Y: Thursday - February 8,_19_9 . You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you arm-linable to respond by She above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter7),0--�.�27.,. 1 ,-.rQ5 -0 --,.fc�b�p, � -/ED Written Written comments provided below: .14N t.q,11� rut v.L ` '4V il,;& U1J,gt� 4 provide rfi f/llirivrlig Ir,Jilrmat cm) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): l . / err SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 .HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FEB-08 96139:11 FROM:WASHCO ' ^ND DEU SERU 503-681-2908 T^:503 684 7297 PAGE:03/10 • WAS!IINGTON COUNTY, ORECON /i Department of Land Use and Transportation, Land Development Services 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503) 648-8761 - FAX: (503) 693-4412 May 19, 1995 Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR 97223 RE: HILL VIEW COMMONS (SDR) 95-0006 Washington County has reviewed this development application and submits the following comments and required conditions for access to SW Bull Mountain Road. a County Major Collector: COMMENTS 1. The minimum access spacing standard for SW Bull Mountain Road is 100 feet, measured between access points on each side of the road as required by Resolution and Order 86-95 and Section 501-8.5.B of the Community Development Code. Access to SW Bull Mountain Road must therefore be restricted to meet this spacing standard. The western driveway shall be aligned with SW 114th Avenue. 2. Resolution and Order 86-95 contains minimum sight distance requirements for access to County roads. County Staff was unable to perform a preliminary sight distance review for this project because of the current work load. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide certification from a registered professional engineer that adequate sight distance exists or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements. in both directions, prior to the County permitting access to the County Road. 3. The proposed development exceeds the minimum requirements of Resolution and Order 86-95 for submittal of an Access Report prepared by the applicant. A traffic analysis for this development proposal is being performed by the County Traffic Analyst based on this Report. The Traffic Analyst's findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City at the time of completion of the review. This review and the recommended conditions of approval which will he developed as a part of that review are required by Resolution and Order 86-95 and Section 501.8.2.B. of the Community Development Code. REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY THE CITY OF HILLSBORO: A. Submit to Land Development Services (Public Assurance Staff. Tracy Stone/ Carolyn Cook. 648-8761) : 1. Completed "Design Option" form. 2. $750.00 Administration Deposit . 3. Provide preliminary certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer at the access point to SW Bull Mountain Road. Provide a detailed list of what improvements are FEB-08 96 09:11 FROM:WASHCO ' ^ND DEU SERU 503-681-2908 '503 684 7297 PAGE:04'10 County Transportation Review May 19, 1995 Page #2 necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance. NOTE: Any portion of the Administration Deposit not used by Washington County for plan approval , field inspections, and contract administration will be returned to the applicant. If at any time during the project, the County's costs are higher than the amount deposited. Washington County will bill the applicant the amount needed to cover its costs. 4. Two (2) sets of complete engineering plans for the construction of the following public improvements: a. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. b. Commercial access to SW Bull Mountain Road to County standards. c. Improvements within the right-of-way as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance at SW Bull Mountain Road access point. d. Close all existing driveways to SW Bull Mountain Road. e. Any additional off-site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R80 86-95 upon completion of the County Traffic Analyst's review. f. Provide adequate roadway drainage along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. Clean, grade and shape the ditch. B. Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon completion of the following: 1. Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for the construction of the public improvements listed in conditions I .A.4. NOTE: The Public Assurance staff (Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook. 648- 8761) of Land Development Services will send the required forms to the applicant's representative after submittal and approval of the public improvement engineering plans . 2. Provide evidence that the documents required by condition I.C. have been recorded. C. The following documents shall be executed and recorded with Washington County: 1. Dedicate additional right-of•way to provide 37 feet from centerline of SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. FEB-08 96 ,09: 12 FROM:WASHCO ' AND DEU SERU 503-681-2908 Tf1:503 684 7297 PAGE:05/10 County Transportation Review May 19, 1995 Page #3 2. Provide a one-foot non-access reserve strip along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, except at approved access points. NOTE: Washington County Survey Division (Jamil Kamawai , 693- 4543) will send the required forms to the applicant's representative. IT_ PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY A. The road improvements required in condition I_A.4. above shall be completed and accepted by Washington County. B. Provide certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer, upon completion of necessary improvements. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please send a notice of decision and appeal information to the County upon completion of your review. We would also appreciate the opportunity to review a draft of the City's conditions pertaining to access to SW Bull Mountain Road. If you have any questions, please contact me at 648.8761. , :1_ •-• • ). Tom Harry, Associate Planner c: Bill Avery, Principal Planner Doug Norval . Traffic Analyst Carolyn Cook. Associate Planner, Assurances Paul Ward, Engineering Associate (Applicant) this i.r,,,norn l lvi,t..tid FEB-08 96 X9:12 FROM:WASHCO IcIND DEU SERU 503-681-2908 Tn:503 694 7297 PAGE:06/10 • 411% WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Department of Land Use and Transportation, Land Development Services 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503)648-8761 FAX: (503) 693-4412 October 16, 1995 Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Re: TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT AND NOTICE OF DECISION FOR A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE ACCESS SPACING REQUIREMENTS FOR HILL-VIEW COMMONS Washington County has completed its review of the proposed development in relation to R8O 86-95. Please consider the recommendations listed on pages 2 and 3 of the attached Transportation Staff Report as a supplement to the recommendations made for conditions of approval given to you during the City's development review process. Washington County has completed it's review of your request for a modification to the access spacing standards. The modification request has been denied (see Attached). If you have any questions please contact me at 648-8761. -iroopp- Tom Harry Associate Planner Attachment- October 12, 1995 Traffic Staff Report October 6, 1995 Modification Decision c. Phil Healy Doug Norval Norm Rindall Ihlj:transpltmotic5.wp FEB-08 96 _09: 13 FROM:WASHCO AND DEL/ SERU 503-681-2908 'fl:503 684 7297 PAGE:07/10 WASHINGTON COUNTY Inter-Office Correspondence Date: October 12 , 1995 TO Tom Harry, Associate Planner FROM Doug Norval , P.E. , Traffic Analyst SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT KILLVIEW COMMONS CITY OF TIGARD This report examines the traffic safety impacts of Hillview Commons, a proposed apartment housing development to consist of 90 multi-family dwelling units, located south of and adjacent to SW Bull Mountain Road near SW 114th Avenue in the City of Tigard. Recommendations are developed to ensure an adequate level of traffic safety as defined by R&O 86-95. An Access Report "Hillview Commons Proposed 90-Unit Subdivision Traffic Analysis Report" Robert Keech Associates, Inc. , February 15, 1995, was submitted for this development application. Supplementary information from Keech Associates dated August 15 and October 2 , 1995 was also submitted. The findings and recommendations given below are based, in part, on the information submitted in this traffic study. Access for the site was reviewed through a Request for Modification of the WCURIDS process. That process (letter from Mike Borresen October 6, 1995) resulted in denial of a proposed access scheme. This study assumes the following access scheme on the south side of SW Bull Mountain Road: 1 . An existing East driveway adjacent to the site' s east property line. This driveway location was approved through the review of the Texaco development in 1988 , and Texaco has an easement to use this driveway. 2 . A new West driveway to align with the centerline of the proposed SW 114th Avenue future street extension. The road network assumed in this analysis is the existing road network. FINDINGS : 1. The site trip generation, based on "Trip Generation, An Informational Report" , Fifth Edition, ITE, is as follows: FEB-08 96 09: 13 PROM:WASHCO ' 'ND DEV SERU 503-681-2908 Tn:503 684 7297 PAGE:013/10 TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT Page 2 HILLVIEW COMMONS CITY OP TIGARD October 12 , 1995 Site Trip Generation ADT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (vpd) (vph) (vph) Enter 277 12 37 Exit 277 36 21 Total 554 48 58 2 . The site impact area, based on 10 percent increase in average daily traffic on roads under Washington County jurisdiction or the minimum impact area, is described below. Link From 12 Bull Mtn Rd At Site Access Points Only 3 . Intersections within the impact area under Washington County jurisdiction were analyzed (AM and PM peak hours) with the following results: Turn Lane Signal intersection LOS Warrant Warrant SPIS Bull Mtn Rd/East Access A Exists No No Bull Mtn Rd/West Access B No No No 4 . Total traffic volumes in the PM peak hour exceed warrants for a left turn refuge on SW Bull Mountain Road westbound approach to the East site access. The existing continuous two-way left turn lane striping was approved previously as part of the review of the Texaco development in 1988 and therefore should remain. Adequate illumination is also required on SW Bull Mountain Road at the proposed East site access. No other applicable traffic safety improvements are identified for the East site access. 5. Adequate illumination is required on SW Bull Mountain Road at the proposed West site access. No other applicable traffic safety improvements are identified for the proposed West site access. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Provide adequate illumination on SW Bull Mountain Road at the East and West site access points. Adequate illumination shall consist of at least one 200 watt high pressure sodium cobra head luminaire mounted at a minimum mounting height of 20 feet on existing utility poles. The fixture shall have a FEB-08 96 .09:13 FROM:WASHCO IAND DEU SERU 503-681-2908 Tn:503 684 7297 PAGE:09/10 TRAFFIC STAFF REPORT Page 3 SILLVIEW COMMONS CITY OF TIGARD October 12 , 1995 medium semi-cutoff type III distribution. The pole shall be located within 50 feet of the radius return on the intersection. If no existing utility poles are present in the proper location, the developer shall meet the lighting requirements of the Department of Land Use and Transportation 1991 Roadway Illumination Standards. DN c: Carolyn Cook/Tracy Stone Massoud Saberian 4:1...\733 FEB-08 96 09:14 FROM:WASHCO " `IND DEU SERU S03-681-2908 T^:503 694 7297 PAGE:10/10 WASHINGTON _�,. COUNTY. ' y OREGON October 6, 1995 17t.-^ Mr. Robert Keech, P. E. / Keech Associates Inc. ,n`rt,�� �?) 1225 NW Murray Boulevard, Suite 111 r ,/• Portland, Oregon 97229 r76y eJSe. sP0^141/011S T17c, SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO W.C.U.R. I .D.S. MI LLVI EW COMMONS CITY OF TIGARD The following is in response to your October 2, 1995, Request for Modification of the W.C.U.R. I .D.S. Section 130.2, Page 9, for a reduced access spacing on SW Bull Mountain Road for an ingress-only driveway spaced approximately 15 feet west of the existing driveway (Texaco easement) located on the site' s east property line. Your request is approved. Your request is approved with conditions as noted below: XX Your request is denied for the following reasons: a. The requested access spacing modification is not justified. b. The requested access spacing modification does not meet Washington County traffic safety requirements. Please be advised that all modifications granted to the W.C.U.R. I.D.S. are considered unique and are not uniformly applicable. NOTE: See Section 250.2.3 for appeal procedures should you wish to appeal . Michael A. Borresen, P. E. Engineering/Surveying Manager Reviewed By: Doug Norval roved 6 : Thomas F. Tushner . Y 9 PP Y c: Plan Review File Traffic Analysis File Tom Harry Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook Dcpanment of Land Use &Transportation Engineering Services 'hone: (503)693-4563 155 Nonh First Avenue, Suite 350-17, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 FAX #:(503)693-4412 RECEIVED PLANNIN -�ti1,L A1�± CITY OF TIGARD • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JAN 3 0 1996 DATE: January 26, 1996 TO: Lee Walker, Unified Sewerage Agency/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - February 8, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ECED V U JAN 3 0 1996 \-.) By (Tkaseprovi&the fofowinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: / Wg11 �2. /-3044/1I IPhone Number(s): SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS t RECEIVED PLANNING JAN 301996 To: Mark Roberts, Planner From: Lee Walker, Design Supervisor USA Subject: Hillview Terrace II Apartments MIS-960001 Date: January 30, 1996 Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Please consider the following comments when reviewing the above named project: I . The storm drainage system south of SW Beef Bend Road is inadequate, the developer is required to; a. install on-site storm water quantity facilities capable of restricting the stormwater discharge to an amount equal the natural release rate from this site, or b. work together with ODOT-USA to provide an adequate down stream storm conveyance. II . The water quality/quantity facility installed north of Beef Bend Road was not designed to accept the water from this site. a. A water quality facility must be constructed in the development, b. the discharge from the development should not flow through the existing facility. c. City approved detailed erosion control plans should be provided to USA for inspection purposes. ' PLANNING Vv " FEB 05 1996 mailair 1� CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: January 26, 1996 TO: Elaine Self, GTE Engineering Office FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 ➢ HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS < A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - February 8, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. x Written comments provided below: t~WQFAR Tb 1PRoy dC- CoMootr -z-z) GrE-`5 Ec ctc4--r<or1S (?1 ase provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: �l�t VI(ES(--4-6A-0 Phone Number(s): 20-5943 SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLAN "' OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JAN 2 9 1996 DATE: January 26, 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 ➢ HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - February 8, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (lease provide thefoaawing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: / ' -�) (h.% may? Phone Number(s): 2c SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS VA IliCEIVED PLANNING F R 0 1 1996 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: January 26, 1996 TO: David Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 ➢ HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - February 8, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the folrowing inforntation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 414, CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: January 2q 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 ➢ HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS Q A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - February 8, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: '► (PTase provide the fo ng inforna.tion) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS SDPa6-00 - 1 i5 q6 -©O ( REQUEST FOR COMMENTS I NOTIFICATION UST FOR LAN)USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS anZEN1 111dtVEll[ENT TEAMS {circle one) _CIT Area: {W) (S) (E) IC) ID Placed for review in Library CR Book ELI I CITY DEPAIthitlitt L BLDG.DEPT./David Scott.lik.kfro oaad 1./- E DEPT./Kelley Jennings,c,...,n...,,...orc�. ✓O,Ett54T10NS/John Acker,rani.spew. _CITY ADMIN./Cathy Wheatley.c�viwc� L DEPT./Brian Roger,w.•bp,. 1....r&o.�... _CO?&DEV.DEPT./DS.T'S ADV.PLNG./Nadine Smith. ra.+gswp....a WATER DEPT./Michael Miller.Opesofons Mprio3perotc..10+w. ISPEtAL DISTRICTS y FIRE MARSHALL _UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchel SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa.County Fre District 155 N.Frst Street Beaverton.OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro,OR 97124 IAFFECTED JURISDICTIONS :1 WA.CO.DEPT.Of LAND USE L TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N.Frst Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#16.Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro.OR 97124 Portland.OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland.OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) _STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _Sim Tice(IGA'S) PO Box Laurie�l Nicholson/Trans.Planning _Mice B«reson(Engineer) Scott ring(CPA's) Portland.OR 97225-0412 123 N.W.Flanders ` ` Tom Hurry(Current Planning App's) Portland.OR 972)9-4037 _Lynn Boiley(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street,N.E. 000T/REGION 1.DISTRICT 2-A CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem.OR 97310-0590 Bob Schmidt/Engineering Coord. Larry Conrad.Senior Planner 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412 PO Box 4755 _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland.OR 97225 Beaverton,OR 97076 • Planning Director 'I 1120 SW 5th _OTHER I _CITY OF KING CITY Portland,OR 97204 City Manager _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 15300 SW 116th _CITY Of DURHAM City Manager ring City.OR 97224 City Manager PO Box 369 ! PO Box 23483 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 I _CITY Of TUALATIN Tigard.OR 97281-3483 1 PO Box 369 Tualatini OR 97062 . . :; ,WEC AL AGENCIES GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC Elaine Sett ORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. f,Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Schols Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 972813416 Beaverton OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 i _NW NATURAL GAS CO. re......mu)rn-s«r _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS ' TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer rQ(103)7,21-2182 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox,Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street I Portland.OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place 5-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 i; ,. _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M.Forney,PLS-Project Eng. I3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave..Room 324 Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Union Station Portland,OR 97209 ISTATE AiS FEDERAL AGENCIES _AERONAUTICS DIVISION(0001) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS 47,US POSTAL SERVICE i _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H.PARK _FISH L WILDUFE Randy Hammock.Growth Cord. _PUC _DOGMA Cedar Mill Station _DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland,OR 97229-9998 i _OTHER _U.S.ARMY CORPS.OF ENGINEERS RAbPAP ^./.nVkTOlk nut • 4,445, City of Tigard,Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. I That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED C) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Check box above,H applicable) (check appropriate box below) (Enter Public Hearing Date above) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council V/ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED n) DECISION FOR: (Check box above,M applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Check box above,if appicable) (check appropriate box below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer L Tigard City Council That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is .ttached, marked Exhibit "A", was ailed to each n.. ed person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached lis s), marked •'bit "B' in• , e •.y of /r/',, 199 CE' , and deposited in the Unitd States ail o the jM1. ;ay of i1 e' , Jr . 199 , postage prepaid. , 41 - ..../Ai..' _ -Iiii -.W.L- AL■41' le l / ' _ Pre,'ar-d Notice I Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ) day of ( , 196. •� OFFICIAL SEAL , _. �� (� ��'rrt,a DIANE M JELDERKS �� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON r i■(4 MY CO ® COMMISSION NO 046112 1/(1/(2)- MV COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 NOTARY PUBLIC OF GO / , My Commission Expire . �f t`FILE INFO.:t� r NAME(S): Allattigej -t47r CASE NO(S). n/``749Z0019-/ /5 -/ 6-Odo/ TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II ADDITION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: HILLVIEW TERRACE II ADDITION Site Development Review SDR 96-0002 Lot Line Adjustment MIS 96-0001 PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to allow the development of 36 apartment units to be added to the 90 unit apartment complex which is currently under construction. The applicant also requested to relocate the previously approved community recreation building to an adjoining property which is presently developed with a single family residence. The applicant has also requested approval for a Lot Line Adjustment to add 1.33 acres to the existing 3.65 acre site. APPLICANT: Andrews Management 4000 SW Kruse Way Lake Oswego, OR 97035 OWNER: Same ZONING DESIGNATION: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The Medium-High Density Residential Zoning District permits the provision of low to medium rise, multiple family residential development. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lots 1200, 1300 and 1400). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18,116, 18.120 18.150 and 18.164. II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 1 Conditions of Approval PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1 . The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from Washington County to construct a half-street improvement in Bull Mountain Road adjacent to the frontage of this site. 2. The applicant shall dedicate additional ROW in Bull Mountain Road to provide a total of 45 feet from centerline. The applicant shall coordinate with Washington County for this dedication. 3. The construction plans shall demonstrate that the proposed public sanitary sewer manholes will be located within areas accessible to City maintenance vehicles. 4. The applicant shall dedicate a public sanitary sewer and vehicle access easement to the City for the proposed public sanitary sewer line extension. 5. The applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewerage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 6. The applicant's plan shall provide sanitary sewer service to the undeveloped parcel to the west of this project. 7. The applicant shall submit storm water calculations to ODOT and the City for review and approval regarding the proposed detention pond. 8. The applicant shall submit water quality calculations to the City demonstrating the proposed pond will meet the criteria of USA R&O 91-47. 9. The applicant shall pay a water quantity fee as established by USA R&O 91-47. 10. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the existing drainageways without significantly impacting properties downstream. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 2 12. The applicant shall provide a hydrology and hydraulic study to describe the adequacy of the proposed system relating to the requirements for both water quality and quantity. The storm drainage system shall provide for both summer and winter storm conditions. The study shall determine how the on-site storm drainage system can serve the undeveloped property to the west and any other parcel within the immediate drainage basin. Staff suggests the applicant provide one analysis to consider both the Hillview Commons project and this proposed addition. 13. Revised site/landscape plans and permits shall be submitted for review and approval. Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. Provide a copy of the site plan for review and approval by the authorized franchised waste hauler. b. The applicant shall provide details concerning the required screening of the proposed swimming pool. c. The applicant shall provide site improvements, an access easement and a joint maintenance agreement to allow access from at least one point to the proposed driveway along the westerly property line. d. An arborist report shall be provided and those trees which are presently in excess of 12 inches in diameter and in good health which are proposed to be removed shall be mitigated on an inch for caliper inch basis throughout the site. Trees may also be mitigated on another site elsewhere or a fee shall be paid where it is not feasible to locate replacement trees elsewhere. e. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 14. The applicant shall construct half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Bull Mountain Road to Washington County standards. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. Additional pavement to provide 22 feet from curb to centerline. b. Curb and gutter. c. Storm drainage improvements, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff. d. Street striping to provide required travel lanes and bike lane. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 3 e. A six foot concrete sidewalk including driveway apron. f. Streetlights as determined by the County. g. Underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in- lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: In 1992 and 1994 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District designations for these properties were amended from Commercial Professional (C-P) to Medium-High Density Residential R-25). In 1995, Site Development Review 95-0006 was approved for a portion of the subject property to allow 90 apartment units. Vicinity Information: The site has frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road and is adjoined by a vacant restaurant to the east, the Wellington Condominiums to the south. A vacant multiple-family residentially zoned property adjoins the site immediately to the west. The site is also adjoined by residential uses and a church on the north side of SW Bull Mountain Road. Site Information and Proposal Description: The portion of the site which is to be redeveloped with a recreation building contains the existing residence. The remainder of the site is presently vacant. The site slopes towards SW Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Highway. The portion of the site which is proposed to be developed with the apartments units had contained a thick undergrowth of brush with several scattered trees. The portion of the site to be redeveloped with a community recreation center use is presently developed with a single family residence. The applicant recently cleared the brush. IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: Section 18.56 (R-25 Zoning District) allows multiple family residential dwelling units as a permitted use. The applicant is proposing to add two apartment buildings with 36 units to an approved twelve building, 90 unit, apartment complex. The applicant is also proposing to relocate the previously approved community recreation building to an adjoining property. Recreational facilities are a required amenity of a multiple family residential use. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 4 Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.56.050 states that the minimum lot area for each multi-family unit in the R-25 zoning district is 1,480 square feet. There is no minimum lot width requirement in the R-25 zone. The minimum lot area calculations as it relates to overall project density is reviewed below. New development within the R-25 zone is required to provide a minimum of 20% landscaping. The applicant provided preliminary calculations which indicate that 50% of the site is to be developed with landscaping in satisfaction with this requirement. Setbacks: Section 18.56.050 states that for multi-family dwellings the setbacks are as follows: front yard - 20 feet; side yard - 10 feet; side yard which abuts a more restrictive zone - 30 feet; rear yard - 20 feet. As indicated on the site plan, the proposal complies with the setback requirements. The maximum building height of this zoning district is 45 feet. As shown on the exterior elevation plans the proposed buildings would be approximately 36 feet in height which is under the maximum allowed. Density Computation: Section 18.92 establishes the criteria for determining the number of dwelling units permitted. In determining the net acreage, the following are subtracted from the gross acreage: sensitive land area; park dedication; dedicated public right-of-way and private streets. To calculate the net units per acre, it is necessary to divide the net acreage by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot by the applicable zoning district. No sensitive lands are found to be present on this site. The required deduction from this property is 15% of the gross site area. The gross acreage of the previously approved Hillview Terrace site is 3.65 acres. The site of the existing residence which is to be added to the property for community recreational use is .35 acres. The area to be added for the additional 36 apartment units is 1.33 acres. This equals a gross of 5.33 acres. From the gross area 15% or .79 acres is taken out for pubic facilities which leaves a net of 4.54 acres. The net area equals 197,762 square feet which is then divided by the minimum lot size of the zoning district which is 1,480 square feet. Through this calculation the site yields the opportunity for 133 dwelling units. The applicant has proposed 126 total dwelling units and is, therefore, in compliance with the density standards. Additional Yard Setback Requirements:. Section 18.96.020 requires that the building setback on SW Bull Mountain Road (a Major Collector) shall be the setback distance required by the zoning district plus 30 feet measured from the centerline of the street. The closest adjoining structure is beyond 45 feet from the centerline of the street which complies with the standard. Distance Between Multiple-Family Structures: Section 18.96.030 states that buildings with windowed walls facing buildings with windowed walls shall have a 25 foot separation, buildings with windowed walls facing buildings with a blank wall shall have a 15 foot separation, buildings with opposing blank walls shall have a 10 foot separation. Where buildings exceed a horizontal dimension of 60 feet or exceed 30 feet in height, the minimum wall separation shall be one foot for each 15 NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 5 feet of building length over 50 feet and two feet for each 10 feet of building height over 30 feet. This section is applicable to the proposed buildings. The building lengths are approximately 135 feet in length. The building elevation plans show that the proposed buildings would have blank walls facing blank walls. The required separation is therefore 10 feet. The separation between the proposed buildings and the approved buildings is in compliance with this section. Driveways, parking lots and walkways shall maintain the following separation for dwelling units within eight feet of the ground level: 1) driveways and parking lots shall be separated from windowed walls by at least eight feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structures shall be separated by at least five feet; and 2) driveways and parking lots shall be separated from living room windows by at least 10 feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structure shall be separated by at least seven feet. As indicated on the site plan, all buildings satisfy the parking lot and walkway separation requirements. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. The landscape plan provides 50% of the site with landscaping. Parking lot trees have been provided in excess of the minimum ratio of one space for each seven uncovered parking spaces in compliance with this requirement. Street Trees: Section 18.100 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The landscape plan provides four Scarlett Oaks which would match and be added to other street trees which were previously approved for portions of the development which has frontage along SW Bull Mountain Road. Based on their size of 60-80 feet at maturity these trees are considered a large species and may be planted at 40 feet on center. The landscape plan provides these trees at a spacing of 34 feet. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) states that trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. As indicated on the site plan, parking lot trees and landscaping have been located in accordance with this section. Screening of Swimming Pools: Section 18.100.110(C) states that all swimming pools shall be enclosed as required by Chapter 14.20 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The enclosure shall be provided by a fence or wall with a minimum height of four foot with a self-latching door or gate. The applicant shall provide details concerning the required screening of the proposed swimming pool. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 6 Screening of Refuse Containers: Section 18.100.110(D) states that any refuse container or disposal area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. The site plan as proposed provides two additional trash and recycling enclosures. A fence plan was provided for this purpose. The fence plan complies with the development standards as proposed. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. Obstructions which may be located in this area shall be clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The proposed site improvements comply with these requirements. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(A)(3) requires a minimum of 1.5 parking spaces for 1 bedroom units and 2 spaces for units with more than 1 bedroom. For the entire development the applicant is proposing 71, one bedroom units and 55 units in excess of one bedroom which requires a total of 217 parking spaces. Section 18.106.020(G) states that multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide or the use of all of the guests of all of the residents of the complex The shared parking shall consist of 15 percent of the total required parking spaces and be centrally located within the development. Based on the total number of required parking spaces, a minimum of 33 visitor parking spaces shall also be provided. Therefore, a total of 250 parking spaces are required. The applicant has provided a total of 255 parking spaces, either covered or uncovered, in satisfaction of this requirement. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that the overall site plan provide seven disabled parking spaces if 201 to 300 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides seven disabled person parking spaces in compliance with this requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Based on the requirement for 250 parking spaces for the entire complex a minimum of 16 bicycle parking spaces are required. The site plan shows the provision of approximately 16 bicycle racks, thereby, satisfying this requirement. It is suggested that one bicycle rack which is currently proposed to be located along SW Bull Mountain Road be relocated to an area adjoining the community recreation building. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 7 Walkways: Section 18.108.050(B) requires that within multi-family developments each residential dwelling shall be connected to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities shall be connected by a walkway system having a minimum width of four feet and constructed of an all weather material. As indicated on the site plan, an integrated system of walkways is proposed which is found to be in compliance with these requirements. Access: Section 18.108.070(D) requires that multiple-family residential uses provide a minimum of two driveways plus one additional driveway to a public street for every 200 units or portion thereof in excess of 100 units. The minimum access width shall be 30 feet, with 24 feet of pavement, curbs and a five foot sidewalk. The site plan indicates the provision of 126 units total therefore a minimum of two driveways are required for this development. This requirement is satisfied as the site plan shows the provision of two access drives with pavement widths of a minimum of 24 feet with walkways having been provided along both driveways leading into the site. Director's Authority to Restrict or Coordinate Access: Section 18.108.110 allows the Director to provide for increased traffic movement on streets by restricting or eliminating driveways on streets. The site is adjoined by vacant multiple family residential property to the west which has the development potential to require two new driveways to SW Bull Mountain Road. The applicant shall provide site improvements, an access easement and a joint maintenance agreement to allow access from at least one point to the proposed driveway along the westerly property line. Signs: Section 18.114.130 (B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the R-25 zone. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Services Technicians. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off. The applicant has proposed two additional such facilities. The applicant shall obtain approval from the hauler for the location and compatibility of the proposed facilities with the service vehicles. Site Development Review: Section 18.120 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal is consistent with these sections has been reviewed elsewhere. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Sections 18.94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations), 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), 18.134 (Variance), 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These sections are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.A.2-18 provides other Site Development Review NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 8 - approval/ standards adjoin the section 18nOt necessarily below. 1��'Year flood' eces gsis covered b Relation plain,0. Thfound applicable to be inapplicable provisions shi• to standards Of that buildings th- N_ m /e the previous/ . 9ual 9 a 1 c hall be'Or-land Ph s are addressed site does the site i character r hthh-N- or located to preserve 5 Environment: sed � states s t ��dame a which present/y of her be preserved existin9 trees 18.120.180.2 Y poste for use d majority site do t c °r es and Th other trees d into th e as a ped with es not currently requires states those trees which are site The community a single,fa urrently hpvd by new that tree proposed s which to be removed recreation milt'residence trees The trees the ed to be are presently has has ct whic he porno of site removed, sent/ °n this not provided several his n of paid where it These trees may shaft be excess of 12 inches arbord an arands es proposed to not feasible also b mitigated inches i st repo t report d tO be EXt rior s/bl e mitigated on an in n diameter n shall be concerning Multiple-family Elevations: e to/ocate rep ace °n another for caliper and healthy provided (decks, any two structures,Section 18.120.180.3 meat trees e/sew elsewhere ::';eZ are prelim e' of the fsets tes h /hOut elevation rY boil ), or c wing: occur that along e id offsets building elevations lowin °r b breaks (decks,minimum the vertical 18 12l i . Sb accordance with the odes n roof Patios, c). b) an face of land ses0.4(A) site• -nd C �s section design provide As indicated bc t by ad' This s that one a h recesses on Extensions /Dining uses and criteria is found buffering shall iii between ss: and roof Section 18.120.108.4(8)e 2pnin9 to hte be inapplicable be provided ad o�n�n• of mechanical roes ° states proposed use le due to the different u es' Se becau i devices things that on, he compatibi with types on adjacent a site and °n roof s service site : eeni with ekistinf Pr;v SViB /l n noo s shall b or 9 from V. residential N site Mountain Road plan provides screening leas, parking of adjoining oriented which sws llin9 units Section 1812 arouediteria is lots, and view nm a mannered from l/�provide private requires he parking buffer noise r which yew b private that a ad. buffered fro and h pro Y adjoining structures adjoin the m adjoining site protects private un; areas f es which inc/ode appear de dents which es the ground boo ground flal uses The nt site D A total no/se, lights,f Dining properties shall r Materials the u he pats y scree Due to th Of three Or perties be er/als to sets be ° areas screened fro e builds reside glare from multiple-family residential. the patio been provided e direct in view of erg orientation,fiat parcels hall be N ve uses.reps from with fencing or from frog and potential the open directly NO OP DEC/S/O/y On-site Pacific Highway masonry Pacific Highway adjoining space 5DR 9s U° private space has eend theaelx existing,coin e The p/i °?�M/s ss.°poi 1111.1.111e111/ s satisfied through or planned, TERRACE.ADDITipN the use PAGE 9 of ground floor patios and balconies. The building design also provides for off-sets or staggering of the patios so that a direct line of site between patios is limited. Private Outdoor Areas: Section 18.120.180.6. requires that private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet. This criteria is satisfied as the applicant is proposing balconies or patios for each unit in excess of 48 square feet. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Section 18.120.180.7 states that in addition to subsections 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the amount of 200 square feet per unit for studios to two-bedroom units and 300 square feet per unit for three or more bedroom units. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: 1) all outdoor space; 2) part outdoor and part indoor space; 3) all public or common space; 4) part common and part private, for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room and balconies on each unit; 5) where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable for reasons of crime prevention and safety. This development requires a total of 26,100 square feet of shared outdoor recreation area (117 units @ 200 s.f. and 9 units @ 300 s.f.). A swimming pool has been proposed for on-site shared recreation purposes. The applicant proposes extensive landscaping over 50% of the net lot area or 115,749 square feet with a mixture of walkways, passive enjoyment areas, and common outdoor lawn areas. The larger areas to be provided for the shared outdoor recreation are centrally located and readily observable by the residents of several dwelling units. The Police Department has reviewed the landscape plan and have recommended approval of the plan as proposed. Demarcation of spaces: Crime Prevention: Section 18.120.180.9 states that structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas, semi- public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined in order to establish persons having a right to be in the space, in order to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. The applicant addressed these concerns with the Police Department for the previously approved 90 unit portion of this development. The Police Department had no new concerns regarding this 36 unit addition. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180.10 requires that windows be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that can be observed by others; mail boxes located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; exterior lighting levels selected and angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and light fixtures shall be provided in areas having pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas. Separated laundry areas are not proposed for this development. The Police Department has reviewed this addition and had no new concerns regarding this addition. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 10 Access and Circulation: Section 18.120.180.11 requires that the City review; a) The number of allowed access points for a development shall be as provided in Section 18.108.070; b.) All circulation patterns within a development shall be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles; and c.) Provisions shall be made for pedestrianways and bicycleways if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan. The Fire District has reviewed this request and had not indicated concerns with the access as shown. Access standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Public Transit: Section 18.120.180.12 requires that the City review; a.) Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; b.) The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (i.) the location of other transit facilities in the area; and (ii.) The size and type of the proposal; c.) The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (I.) Bus stop shelters; (ii.) Turnouts for buses; and (iii.) Connecting paths to the shelters. SW Bull Mountain Road is not presently served by transit. A copy of the proposed development plans have been provided to TRI-Met. The City has not received any comments concerning this proposal. Parking: Section 18.120.180.13 requires that the City review; a.) All parking and loading areas shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sections 18.106.050 and 18.106.090, Chapters 18.102, Visual Clearance, and 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Parking standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaping: Section 18.120.180.14 requires that the City review; a.) All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. b.) In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c.) A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Landscape standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Drainage: Section 18.120.180.15 requires that the City review; a.) All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan. Drainage requirements have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Provision for the Handicapped: Section 18.120.180.16 requires that the City review; a.) All facilities for the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 487. The applicant has addressed these requirements by providing handicapped parking spaces and handicapped accessible dwelling units. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the City will review this development in detail for compliance with the requirements. Signs: Section 18.120.180.17 requires that the City review that all sign placement and construction shall be designed in accordance with requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114. All provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections of this title (e.g., the Planned development, Chapter 18.80.; or a Variance granted under Chapter 18.134; etc.) The applicant has not requested sign permits in conjunction with this application. The applicant can NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 11 apply for signage for this development. Sign applications are reviewed by the Development Services Technicians. Underlying Provisions and Regulations of the Underlying Zone: Section 18.120.180.18 requires that the City also review all other underlying requirements of the zoning district. The underlying zoning district requirements are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Tree Removal: Section 18.150 requires that new development preserve existing where possible and requires that trees having in excess of 12 inch caliper or greater be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The majority of the site does not currently have trees. The portion of the site which is presently developed with a single-family residence which is proposed to be redeveloped for use as a community recreation has several trees proposed to be incorporated into the site. The applicant has not provided an arborist report concerning other trees which are to be removed on this site. An arborist report shall be provided and those trees which are presently in excess of 12 inches in diameter and healthy which are proposed to be removed, shall be mitigated on an inch for caliper inch basis throughout the site. Trees may also be mitigated on another site or a fee shall be paid where it is not feasible to locate replacement trees elsewhere. Lot Line Adjustment: Section 18.162.060 contains standards for approval of a lot line adjustment request: 1. An additional parcel is not created by the Lot Line Adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustment is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structure(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; and 3. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district. The criteria 1-3 have been addressed because no structures exist for the subject area. Each resulting parcel will continue to exceed the minimum requirements of the zoning district. In addition to meeting the above standards, a Lot Line Adjustment must also meet the following criteria reviewed under Section 18.162.050 which is applicable to proposed lot line adjustments and lots created through the Minor Land Partition process. 1. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 12 2. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. 3. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. 4. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. 5. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. 6. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. 7. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. 8. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 9. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 10. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria 1 is satisfied because the R-25 Zoning District does not have an average lot width requirement. Criteria 2 is satisfied as the lot areas would greatly exceed the minimum 1,480 square foot minimum lot size requirement. Criteria 3 is satisfied as the site would have approximately 480 feet of frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road. Criteria 4 is satisfied because all of the proposed improvements will comply with the setback requirements of the R-25 Zoning District as reviewed elsewhere within this report. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 13 Criteria 5 and 6 are not applicable as the existing and proposed newly reconfigured lots • are not flag lots. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards, thereby, satisfying Criteria 7. Criteria 8 has been addressed because the larger site to be created through this action is proposed to be developed as one apartment development. Criteria 9 is satisfied because the existing home and the 36 additional dwelling units which have been proposed will use previously approved driveways to SW Bull Mountain Road. Criteria 10 is not applicable as neither parcel is within the floodplain. V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS Engineering Department Comments Findings: Streets: The subject parcel has frontage on SW Bull Mountain Road, which is under Washington County jurisdiction as a major collector street. As part of the Hillview Commons approval, the County performed a Traffic Staff Report, dated October 12, 1995, to identify safety improvements for Bull Mountain Road. The County required the applicant to provide illumination at both the east and west access points into this development. For this proposed addition, no additional traffic safety improvements are required. However, standard County improvements along the additional frontage of Bull Mountain Road are required. These improvements include concrete sidewalk to County standards, any necessary roadway improvements to provide adequate sight distance at the proposed access points and necessary improvements to the existing roadside ditch to provide adequate roadway drainage. The applicant also provided an addendum to the original traffic analysis report, submitted by Robert Keech on February 15, 1995. The addendum is dated February 28, 1996 and indicates that the additional 36 units will not cause any significant impact over that which was identified in the 1995 report. Therefore, the City will not require additional transportation improvements over what was required of the first phase. As part of the Hillview Terrace project, the City required a standard half-street improvement along the Bull Mountain Road frontage that included a left turn refuge for the east driveway. The existing roadway consists of approximately 16 feet of pavement from centerline. The half-street improvement for the new project is proposed to provide additional paving to give 21 feet from centerline per Washington County standards. However, City standard calls for 22 feet of paving in order to allow for a permanent center turn lane in the future and to provide for on-street bike lanes now. The applicant's plan will need to be revised to show that the half-street improvement will provide 22' of paving from curb to centerline. The applicant was allowed to utilize the existing pavement section adjacent to Hillview Commons and simply sawcut and add the additional pavement widening. It is also intended that this same provision will be allowed for this project. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 14 A right-of-way (ROW) dedication is also required. The existing ROW measures approximately 20 feet from centerline. The applicant dedicated additional ROW to provide 45 feet from centerline as a part of the Hillview Commons project. The current plan for the addition also indicates the applicant will dedicate additional ROW to provide 45 feet from centerline. The applicant shall coordinate with Washington County for the ROW dedication. Sanitary Sewer: As part of the Hillview Commons project, the applicant is extending an eight inch public sewer line from the property to the south into this project. The proposed addition will be served by this public line extension. The applicant also intends to extend the public sewer line to the west boundary of the site to provide future service to the adjacent undeveloped parcel. The existing public sewer line will adequately serve this area. Staff is concerned, however, that the applicant has not demonstrated how access will be provided to the City for maintenance of the proposed public sewer line extension. The applicant shall revise the site plan to show how vehicular access to the public manholes will be made available to City maintenance vehicles. Manholes can be located within parking or drive aisles if the applicant provides the proper public sanitary sewer and access easement(s). Storm Drainage: The site slopes to the southeast. It is intended that the storm water from this site will be collected with the storm water from the Hillview Commons project and discharge at the permitted out-fall site at the southern edge of the Hillview Commons site. From that point, the drainage flows toward the existing ODOT frontage road, adjacent to Pacific Highway. Although comments have not yet been received from ODOT, it has been ODOT's policy to require on-site detention of storm water prior to discharging toward an ODOT facility. The applicant is proposing to construct a pond facility that will both detain the 25-year storm event and provide treatment of the lower summer flows. Without calculations, Staff is not able to determine if the pond is sized adequately to handle the 25-year event. Prior to issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall submit storm calculations to both ODOT and the City for review, and approval. The applicant shall submit evidence that ODOT has approved the proposed detention pond design. The undeveloped parcel to the west of this site should also be accounted for in the applicant's storm drainage system design. A basin analysis should be submitted to the Engineering Department indicating that the applicant's storm drainage conveyance system is sized to handle the surrounding drainage basin. The applicant is not required to size the detention facility for the entire basin, but they must size the piping on the site to accommodate upstream flows. The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water run-off generated from newly created NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 15 impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency, and method to be used, in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated above, the proposed pond facility is proposed to treat the storm water. VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation reviewed this application and provided the following comments: 1. No access will be permitted to SW Pacific Highway west. 2. Any potential drainage to an ODOT system must be reviewed and approved. On- site detention required. 3. Any work on ODOT right-of-way requires a permit. 4. Street improvements will be required. GTE reviewed this application and stated the developer shall place conduit to GTE's specifications. Unified Sewerage Agency reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: The storm drainage system south of SW Beef Bend Road is inadequate, the developer is required to: a. Install on-site storm water quantify facilities capable of restricting the stormwater discharge to an amount equal to the natural release rate from this site; or b. The applicant shall work together with ODOT-USA to provide an adequate down stream conveyance. II. The water quality/quantity facility installed north of Beef Bend Road was not designed to accept the water from this site. a. A water quality facility must be constructed in the development. b. The discharge from the development should not flow through the existing facility. c. City approved detailed erosion control plans should be provided to USA for inspection purposes. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 16 Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation reviewed this application and provided the following written comments and required conditions for access to SW Bull Mountain Road, a County Major Collector: COMMENTS 1. The minimum access spacing standard for SW Bull Mountain Road is 100 feet measured between access points on each side of the road as required by Resolution and Order 86-95 and Section 501-8.5.B of the Community Development code. Access to SW Bull Mountain Road must, therefore, be restricted to meet this spacing standard. The western driveway shall be aligned with SW 114th Avenue. 2. Resolution and Order 86-95 contains minimum sight distance requirements for access to County roads. County Staff was unable to perform a preliminary sight distance review for this project because of the current work load. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide certification from a registered professional engineer that adequate sight distance exists or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements, in both directions, prior to the County permitting access to the County Road. 3. The proposed development exceeds the minimum requirements of Resolution and Order 86-95 for submittal of an Access Report prepared by the applicant. A traffic analysis for this development proposal is being performed by the County Traffic Analyst based on this Report. The Traffic Analyst's findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City at the time of completion of the review. This review and the recommended conditions of approval which will be developed as a part of that review are required by Resolution and Order 86-95 and Section 501-8.2.B of the Community Development Code. REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY THE CITY OF HILLSBORO: A. Submit to Land Development Services (Public Assurance Staff, Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook, 681-3843): 1.) Completed "Design Option" form. 2.) $750.00 Administration Deposit. 3.) Provide preliminary certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer at the access point to SW Bull Mountain Road. Provide a detailed list of what improvements are necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 17 NOTE: Any portion of the Administration Deposit not used by Washington County for plan approval, field inspections, and contract administration will be returned to the applicant. If at any time during the project, the County's costs are higher than the amount deposited, Washington County will bill the applicant the amount needed to cover its costs. 4.) Two (2) sets of complete engineering plans for the construction of the following public improvements: a. Concrete sidewalk to County standard along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. b. Commercial access to SW Bull Mountain Road to County Standards. c. Improvements within the right-of-way as necessary to provide adequate intersection sight distance at SW Bull Mountain Road access point. d. Close all existing driveways to SW Bull Mountain Road. e. Any additional off-site safety improvements found to be required for compliance with R&O 86-95 upon completion of the County Traffic Analyst's review. f. Provide adequate roadway drainage along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. Clean, grade and shape the ditch. B. Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon completion of the following: 1. Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for the construction of the public improvements listed in conditions I.A.4. NOTE: The Public Assurance staff (Tracy Stone/Carolyn Cook 681- 3843) of Land Development Services will send the required forms to the applicant's representative after submittal and approval of the public improvement engineering plans. 2. Provide evidence that the documents required by condition I.C. have been recorded. C. The following documents shall be executed and recorded with Washington County: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 18 1. Dedicate additional right-of-way to provide 37 feet from centerline of SW Bull Mountain Road frontage. 2. Provide a one-foot non-access reserve strip along SW Bull Mountain Road frontage, except at approved access points. NOTE: Washington County Survey Division (Jamil Kamawal, 693-4543) will send the required forms to the applicant's representative. II. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY: A. The road improvements required in condition I.A.4. above shall be completed and accepted by Washington County. B. Provide certification of adequate sight distance in accordance with County Code, prepared and stamped by a registered professional engineer, upon completion of necessary improvements. No other comments have been received. VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owners of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MARCH 25, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 19 } The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. on March 25, 1996. Questions: If you have questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. —iC&149\ '' 3/14/96 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Associate Planner � 3/14/96 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo ; DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE ADDITION PAGE 20 r r -- lis)A.4- 17°\ ' 7,. rye r'010 •r. � - .. 0y 1� / �,1 u 11 • 1 \ ,/i -v g ..4 121 •� ' I SE= rif# ii- :Ifqp#3---',4* °1'. t Arad,„; if ,g4-- 1.0,-:. -,-/,,T 7.----0*,i., ,,,,,,„05-.,,,. / -. i i k 417.4 31' -,1,14 �' =Imo/MTV& :� � �� 0,,� _-_,;� _ Z / `` 4' ��� ••�� tot a :( ' OPSED 4 �/ r ��� iSt AE •�� , C-**,741ri," 17110 - ------- - \ '''''?,,,,, ,ot- \ 1,, / 1/ 44444 '' V 1 ----- I \ .4 I rt**, r Ole- \ ' in CC I 4tir IPA - , ..._„,... %kw:. ,.. , ..... � . ' / 2110 irc -vitommaiR i_ (.../ ir 210 i/LE ,, op .9 ad �� u_ I; iar 1�� 74;o■1��'�1� ,i O Lwj b _ >" 1 I- / •. . Exi9T. BLDG 0 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. SDR 96-0002 EXHIBIT MAP I MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENT EXPANSION t 1 r 1 I [ I i---- r - .•ACT u s: 411, ril' ' °rill , 45/N- . ai4vol A I A AAP ■■ •■_ ��J efl Mr C13 a . Pr r r it BULLMOU`�NRD � r ���' ��L��2 P : LS --a»-, qth/ , 0 11111 n _ •1 t nip.T co Ahab a. S viipOpi te4C SI: am, kl • It.-4' irm 1 CU a* 4 E g a it; . ,0_-L 4C4tity ,,,, oil'#;* 5)1-.7' >>j.;..44; ' 0 4'1 ,. Iii 41/ U 0 . -. - e s . *4 ..711,...... ,5:,,, c., 4* ..:,„ i \‘‘,. 0 ‘6 * . it* f--.-7 :,:ifig 1 , Vicinity Map A SDR 96-0002/NIIS 96-0001 Note: Map is not to scale Hillview Terrace II Apts. Addition N .SDR 96-0001 ANDREWS MGMT. APTS. (Page 1/2) (Hillview Tillie II Apt. ExpansiorEXTrI p i-�, 2S110AC-01300 2S110BD-01600 ANDERSON, PHYLLIS M& ANDERSON, PHYLLIS F TR ROGER F TRUSTE 11777 S IZABETH#333 11777 S N ELIZABETH#333 TY,OR 97224 K CITY, OR 97224 2S110AC-01400 2S110AC-01200 ANDERSON, PHYLLIS M/ROGER F TR ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED 11777 SW QUEEN ELIZABETH#333 4000 KRUSE WAY PL KING CITY, OR 97224 BLDG 1 #270 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S110BD-01500 2S110AC-01000 ARTIS,VICKI K CALABAZAS CREEK LTD INVESTRS& 11670 SW BULL MTN RD CALIFORNIA BOARDWALK LTD INVES TIGARD, OR 97223 2570 EL CAMINO REAL WEST#500 MT VIEW, CA 94040 2S110AC-01700 2S110AC-01600 CHRIST THE KING CRANE,FREDRICK T AND NELDA LUTHERAN CHURCH 11455 SW BULL MT RD 11305 SW BULL MTN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AC-01500 2S110BD-03400 CRANE, FREDRICK T HELM, LARRY D AND TAMARA L 11455 SW B N RD 14960 SW 116TH PL T ,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110BD-00200 2S110BD-03200 MORENO, HERBERT A NORBO,WESLEY J JR&KATHLEEN 14590 SW MCFARLAND BLVD 14916 SW 116TH PL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110BD-02100 2S110AC-01100 NORGART, RANDALL E&STACEY L ROBERT C WYATT INC 11550 SW BULL MTN RD BY KIMBERLY ANN DOYLE TIGARD, OR 97224 5642 LOS ANGELES AVE SIMI VALLEY,CA 93063 2S110BD-08200 2S110BD-07900 ROYAL OAKS DEVELOPMENT CO ROYAL OAKS DEVELOP CO 12096 SW ASPEN RIDGE RD 12096 SW AS IDLE RD TIGARD, OR 97224 T ,OR 97224 2S110BD-08000 2S110BD-08100 ROYAL OAKS DEVELOP 0 ROYAL OAKS DEVEL T CO 12096 SW AS Pl Rt GE RD 12096 SW RIDGE RD T4Q R15 OR 97224 T ,OR 97224 2S110BD-00100 2S110BD-02800 ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH THALE,WILLIAM J&KARYN M PO BOX 23033 14867 SW 116TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 SDR 96-0002 ANDREWS MGMT. APTS. (Page 2/2) (Hillview Terrace II Apt. Expansion) MIS 96-0001 EXHIBIT 3 2S1 10 BD-02900 2S 110BD-03000 EXHIBIT GEORGE WALL,GEORGE 8555 SW TURQUIOSE LP 8555 SW TURQUOISE LP BEAVERTON, OR 97007 BEAVERTON, OR 97005 2S110BD-03100 2S110BA-02400 WALL, GEORGE E WHITE,GARY M&HYUN 0 8555 S UOIES LP 1 BOWERMAN DR VERTON, OR 97007 BEAVERTON, OR 97005 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notic TT 8424 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 E rv � D Legal Notice Advertising �� )�9E •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd . �'rTY OF TrGARD 'Tigard,Oregon 9722i99 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit *Accounts Payable-Terry • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)96-0002/ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(MIS)96-0001 IIILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS The Director has approved, subject to conditions,a request to add 36 eut project conditions, was previously equ request to approved 36 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION apartment units to an apartm P j to place the common for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed e t e Comm n STATE OF OREGON, ) recreation building on an adjoining property.The applicant COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Bull Mountain Road I,__- _ Kathy Snyder_ Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 he site i. west of the apartment WCTM 2S1 l OAC,Tax Lot 1400). Director,or, duly sworn, rinci depose and sayy,that I — the gdvertisin ds m- and Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-Tualatin 'Dimes project which is presently under R 25 zoning district ZONE:e Medium-High a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 Density Residential (R-25). g and 193.020; published at Tigard in the medium rise,multiple-family residential units for medium-high density aforesaid county and state; that the residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: SDR 96-0002 Hillview Terrace II Community(De1elop 1 Development Chapters rs 18.56, 1892, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, _. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the _- — - • „j2.11 � - r entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and ,� ■- `\ consecutive in the following issues: 11,,11.• March 14 , 1996 IIVr• Mill 11111,111 OtIC-111L, 40-4-Aiiff._ -nod I5I mom is day March 19.9 hI' h da of Ma Subscribed and sworn to re me this 14t S �Notary lic for Oregon \ r � ` My Commission Expires: ' Mat:��rr� AFFIDAVIT 11r11 ffrOp do II 0,0. 11 grill er...;,;,-- bt40 `o•..--_tT- . > ♦•��0 "I� The adopted finding of facts,decisio and statement ment of conditions Center, ons can be S.W. obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall l h final decision n 2S 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal ance with Section 18.32.290(A)and Section 18.32.370 of the CommunitY filed within 10 Development after oticec is given and sent.The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,March 25,1996. TT8424-Publish March 14, 1996. \11 "le rn:�.u:o1=x 2s11oebxlx 28110134@400 2S11U C.Oift1U 25110PG01`,� 251108600200 (5.10• 21,11:AC-013CC 2S110Pb011, ! • a) 2:3110Eeo 01,00 2S1111i4L,W1x �w csrx • • 1uo x, 2s cAc0'x .a1,6r;ov zsttael;utaaa 281108608100 2511081302800 2si10B602000 108603000 1 11081303100 2511080-0 3200 zsnaaco,ax 28110eoa3400 0 /64. rj17— dTa3 Vicinity Map NOTIFICATION MAP SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 N APPLICANT MATERIALS Preapv //7-7_ gev q /45__a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO."'2. -Z.5e.1/70.- OTHER CASE NO'S: N/16 RECEIPT NO. C)/&p —2714-7) APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ✓ DATE: l _ 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION /13j(� 1/ ( , pplication form (1) W- L''-(B)/ wner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. authorization 2S/. in. y /-5/ I [ h (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE `jF tsi BCD) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* //,�� j,(k( h19. (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS 412n9 `c 2, 1 taely PHONE 5 L.,..(-1) Applicant's statement CITY �,, /-.6 O'1LL)F�77 / ZIP 67-7,■*, " (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* c jfE ✓1 A(G) List of property owners and ADDRESS PHONE addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY ZIP 1"----(--H) Filing fee ($ ) *When the owner and the applicant are different ✓ I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE 7ETERMI D TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written t /7 5 616 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Wl p , W 1. / The owners of record of the subject property J f request site development review approval to _ erc allow ` � r5 4742 Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: Y !/ L0. Zf=.r?T 0�a1 CDT At21() 72iElOr 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. A. Co (KSL:pm/0524P) ( z2/. 6o-t 5 , 541, Coo III, 4111 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 t/ CASE NO. 1 J -�I CO " 1. GENERAL INFORMATION OTHER CASE NO'S: MGM 0.02._ RECEIPT NO. 1' ( dill '�(, �.- PARCEL 1 L,�1 ` / APPLICATION ApC� PTED BY: OBL VU V- PROPERTY ADDRESS /fir,- A,', ad, a9(J `f/lr 40, DATE: l-/ 1G TAX MAP AND LOT NO. 07/ //'A(", /r4(7) .ik-AD/, Application elements submitted: PROPERTY OWNERS /41 Jl e/V)(-- .&d(&'f ]r y�,---01) A plication form (1) ADDRESS chi), /ef G HONE 6:W g4OY - Owner's signatures CITY /41611 / ,f/e7C) Ce;? ZIP '17/ 5c / written authorization PARCEL 2 4(C) Title transfer instrmt PROPERTY ADDRESS /A, OLuz,i / (1) h../a (D) Assessor's map (1) TAX MAP AND LOT NO. 2L5/ /D. /-7.. /9 l` (E) Preliminary Map PROPERTY OWNERS 4()J 0_19 /4/11. .CfI X11 ( 6 copies) ADDRESS 2 ) 110_ le...e l/9f PHONE Cp, S k.1GA-(F) r4 ..f°bu t;ng. wnemo CITY L2/.11/4:. iJ ZIP : / �� VVV /11 APPLICANT*/AGENT , (Jf_ ,4c , a�� (G) Filing fee {$s0) WiWA w DATE DETE INED/TO/ BE COMPLETE: ADDRESS /,?6 /' (,,/ j,4 PHONE _ 1 Z�j/ Z(. CITY 11 ,(d 7i ) ?7) 62Z: ZIP e 7D-3s FINAL DECISION` DEADLINE: *When the owner and the applicant are different COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: the applicant must be the purchaser of record ,44€), 144A(4 / P-25 or a lease in possession with written authorization -T- from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 1,1)e5(11- authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or Planning Director Approval Date submit a written authorization with this application. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property Final Approval Date: request permission to adjust /� (number) Planning: parcels of 6-6/hr and 3(0,5i1c1 . Engineering: (acreage or square footage) into parcels of 16=Z' and 4:47:g . Date Recorded and Number: (number) (acreage or square footage) bkm/LTLNEADJ.WPF 400 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part part of this application: / 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 19_ SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. egno 10, CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0002 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96-0001 FILE TITLE: HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS APPLICANT: Andrews Management OWNER: Same 4000 SW Kruse Way Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (503) 639-8645 REQUEST: A request to add 36 apartment units to an apartment project which is approved for 90 units. The applicant has also proposed to place the common recreation building on an adjoining property. The applicant proposes to add 1.33 acres into the existing 3.65 acre apartment site through a Lot Line Adjustment. LOCATION: 11336 SW Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2s1 10AC, Tax Lot 1400). The site is west of the apartment project which is presently under construction. ZONE: Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). The R-25 zoning district permits low and medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium-high density residential development. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.56, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, CRITERIA: 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. CIT: Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317 SDR 96-0002/MIS 96-0001 HILLVIEW TERRACE II APARTMENTS PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • R. G. NAFF, Designer 18641 SW. Benfield Ave. Lake Oswego. Oregon 97035 639-8045 Fax 639-5377 HILLVIEW TERRACE II SITE LOCATION The project site is located on the south side of Bull Mountain Rd. approximately 300 feet west of its intersection with Pacific Highway. SITE DESCRIPTION Generally the site slopes from the high point of 332 feet at the northwest corner to a low point of 260 ft. at the Southwest corner with and average gradient of 11%. Vegetation on the site consists primarily of natural grasses and brush. OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS No off site improvements are anticipated at this time. ZONING The subject site is currently zoned R-25 multi-family. Site Development review and a lot line adjustment is required. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a unit addition to the Hillveiw Terrace apartments currently under construction. Parking is provided at the rate of 2 stalls per dwelling unit CONFORMANCE TO CITY STANDARDS The design and density of this project will be in compliance with the intended use allowed by the City of Tigard Development Code. OPERATIONS The apartment project will be staffed with a resident manager with occasional professional assistance as is necessary. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON SS CITY OF TIGAAO I, . ,!R M V4, , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 17-- --)G'M i`- ( , 19 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at T4k L2T 7,26r.) 2,e)/ /OA aiq /3-)1( 14, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at .7 Ak- , with postage prepaid thereon. Aid) sworn / S•r •- •j / Subscribed and srn to before me this // day of De ce la-er , 19 ?3--- Notary Public �� /d/ / My Commission Expires: 9 7 / OFFICIAL SEAL f ELLEN P FOX NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON f COMMISSION NO.024561 ,c MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,1997 r1, '» 111111�11111�11'�'\11 h_\Icg in\jo\aifmaii.at SPENCER VAIL ° PLANNING CONSULTANT December 1 , 1995 Re: Andrews Management Proposal to add lot area and increase in number of units from 90 to 126 . Dear Interested Party I represent the property owners and developers of property on the south side of SW Bull Mountain Rd. west of the Texaco Station and across the street from Christ the King Lutheran Church. We proposed to add additional property to an already approved apartment project and increase the total number of units by 36 . The property involved is legally shown on the map on the reverse side and denoted as "expansion area" . Before to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review and other necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: Tuesday, December 19 , 1995 Christ the King Lutheran Church 11305 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 7: 00 PM The meeting will be held in the Fellowship room. Use the Office entrance accessible from the lower parking lot. Please note that this will be an informational meeting on the Preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal to the city. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you at the meeting. Please call me at 281-8245 or Ron Naff , 639-8045, if you have any questions regarding the proposal. Very truly yours 4 / , fencer H. Vail 45Q5 N.E. 24TH AVENUE • PORTLAND, OREGON 97211 • 503/281-8245 • FAX 503/284-5506 ' - 2S110AC 00400, 00500* 1S110AC 00900* 21S110AC 010000* USA-WEST Apt. Ltd Calabazas Creek Ltd. In% c/o Mr. Helmet Kiffman Triad Tigard Ltd Ptnshp Califirnia Boardwalk Pres. Multitech 15001 SW 109th 2507 W El Camino Real 5320 Miramar Rd. Tigard, Or 97224 #500 San Diego, Ca 92121 Mt. View, Ca 94040 2S110AC 01000* 2S110AC 01100* 21S110AC 01101* MANAGER'S OFFICE ROBERT C. WYATT INC Texaco Refining Marketir WELLINGTON ESTATES 11290 SW BULL MTN RD PO BOX 7813 11545 SW BEEF BEND RD. TIGARD, OREGON 97224 UNIVERSAL CITY, CA 916C TIGARD, OREGON 97224 21S110AC 01101* 21S110AC 01200* 2S110AC 01300,1400* ANDREWS MANAGEMENT PHYLLIS M. ANDERSON TAXACO STATION 4000 SW KRUSE WAY PL. ROGER F. ANDERSON TR. 11290 SW BULL MTN RD. BUILDING #1 SUITE 270 11777 SW QUEEN ELIZABETI TIGARD, OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 #333 KING CITY, OR 97224 21S110AC 01400* 2S110AC 01500-1600* 2S110AC 01700* OCCUPANT FREDRICK & NELDA CRANE CHRIST THE KING CHURCH 11430 SW BULL MTN RD 11455 SW BULL MTN RD. 11305 SW BULL MTN RD. TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110AB 00400* 2S110AB 00400* 2S110AB 02300* NORMANDY ASSOCIATES MANAGER'S OFFICE IRINA ROGACHEVSKY 11917 MARINE VIEW DR. THE COLONIES APTS 14420 SW 114TH EDMONDS WA 98026 14220 SW 112TH TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* ABDULLA ALKADI BEV FROUDE BILL GROSS 11905 SW 125TH CT 12200 SW BULL MTN RD. 11035 SW 135TH TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97223 CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* CHRISTY HERR ED HOWDEN KATHIE KALLIO 11386 SW IRONWOOD LOOP 11829 SW MORNING HILL 12940 SW GLACIER LILY TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* LINDA MASTERS BONNE AND JIM ROACH SCOTT RUSSELL 15120 SW 141ST 14447 SW TEWKESBURY 31291 RAYMOND CREEK RD TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OT 97224 SCAPOOSE OR 97056 CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* BARBARA SATTLER KATHY SMITH JUNE SULFFRIDGE 11245 SW MORGAN CT 11645 SW CLOUD CT 15959 SW 146TH TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* CIT-WEST* LARRY WESTERMAN CAL WOOLERY CLARK G. ZELLER 13665 SW FERN 12356 SW 132ND CT 13290 SW SHORE DR. TIGARED, OR 97223 TIGARD, OT 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S110BD 00100* 2S110BD 00100* 2S110BA 02400* St.James Episcopal Church OCCUPANT GARY M. WHITE PO Box 23033 11511 SW Bull Mtn. Toad 1 SW BOWERMAN DR Tigard, Or 997281 Tigard, Or 97281 BEAVERTON, OR 97005 2S110BA 02400* 2S110BD 02100* 2S110BD 01500* OCCUPANT RANDALL & STACEY NORGART VICKI K. ARTIS 14570 SW McFARLAND BLVD 11550 SW BULL MTN RD 11670 SE BULL MTN RD TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110BD 01600* 2S110BD 00200* 2S110BD 02800* KENNETH J. GAMBEE HERBERT A. MORENO WILLIAM & KARYN THALE 433SW SKYLINE BLVD 14590 SW McFARLAND BLVD 14867 SE 116TH PL PORTLAND, OR 87221 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110BD 02900* 2S110BD 03000* 2S110BD 03000* WILLIAM & JACLYN HITSMAN GEORGE WALL RESIDENT 14849 SE 116TH PL 8555 SW TURQUOISE LOOP 14872 SW 116TH PL TIGARD, OR 97224 BEAVERTON OR 97007 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110BD 03100* 2S110BD 03200* 2S110BD 03300* MICHAEL & LORI KELLER WESLRY & KATHLEEN WESLEY OCCUPANT 14894 SW 116TH PL 14916 SW 116TH PL 14938 SW 116TH PL TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S110BD 03400* 2S110BD 07900,08100* 2S110BD 08000* LARRY & TAMARA HELM ROYAL OAKS DEVELOPMENT CO EDWARD & SUSAN JOHNSON 14960 SW 116TH PL 12096 SW ASPEN RIDGE DR 17577 NW GILBERT LN TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 PORTLAND, OR 97229 2S110BD 08000* 2S110BD 03400* OCCUPANT HELM COMPANY 2448 SW 117TH PL 15060 SW 116TH PL TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 .-.I.2 l 7 • LEI A4c . L i _ - iii 2.7rAc. f cNRsr r£KING Q LUTHERAN CHURC H /-11-1+'''.-r J \ ��1 4: \ / µ r 7 A- Z. r0 »2 I _- 012 I J / • 61-45611 �/sd 1N�NZA ,o- ; s N' s i, t°J L UL� T tca ^' — -.•,:0,—.• 1101 t.„.07,... 11,..)1,• i_ ;` • �S7�Y:f ,1... / ..--• �a / 13 477 AC :100 �M z:,.. /• .!AC AC. o ' ` L / 2 I T. t Ac. = ss ,� 300 i / • i I / +ao y } / ' I i I R„ / / / / -74 I f �/ / ;f i a / . Li / mar,. / / 772.60 ---.1 I / I ' / r 1 41:'''' )I ......■. / :/ isl i ;9 I _ - — — — 1 I • !..I I J 7 Name of applicant ACS 03 fit 4✓'A €ffL,, SubieG Property: Tax Map and Lat # TL f nd c , I /61) Address cr General Location i ( its.' Li - Y AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE L p vl.PK 1.1,4, 1 , do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating inures In a proposed 3 ' O n'` � A . affecting the land orated at 5-4) e4 A7I gd and did on the / day of ,off-/ l , 19 personally post notice indicating Tat the site may be proposed for a D P i 1.ac v R.....__0(P.u) application, and the time, date and place et a neighborhood meeting to discs the proposaL The sign was posted at 5��" .- -', �„. a'f. Bc /l /07_,L )2..f ,4c1Zc_1sS 1�ht Ch.Urc,4 (state location on property) This ( day of I,2-_-_—_____ 19 7) �, �'%, , Steed and swam =., afl-uicted, before me this /S r day of De �.2 , 19 gJ 1111 ���1-�`ti�1-� -tit tie ZG � -� ,•,......,. OFFICIAL SEAL . e ELLEN P FOX j Notary Public for the Stare of Oregon `. .® NOTARY Pli8tlGO cr ? • My Commission E )1A-4-<,/ /6 f9 9 7 COMMISSION N0.024561 r � MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,1997 / .s15, -` 1111\ZZZ��11111'�1111J WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RE*,URN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: Cry of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hail Shed. Tigard. OR 97223 • TI E • ME :Lk Andrews Management is proposing to develop 36 additional units by increasing lot area. Before applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review and other necessary permits, the applicants would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: Tuesday, December 19, 1995 CHRIST THE ICING LUTHERAN CHURCH 11305 SW Bull Mt. Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 7:00 P.M. Meeting will be held in the Fellowship Room accessible by entrance from the lower parking lot. Please note that this is an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal to the City. For additional information, call Spencer Vail at 281-8245 or Ron Naff at 639-8045. f I f MINUTES OF MEETING The meeting began shortly after 7 :00 pm on December 19 , 1995 in the small conference room of Christ the King Lutheran Church. In addition to the applicant's representatives , there were 2 people in attendance . See the attached sign up sheet. Spencer Vail , Planning Consultant for the applicant Andrews Management began by giving an overview of the project. A preliminary site plan was presented. Mr. Vail then asked for questions from the audience. The questions covered the following areas of concern: 1 . The exact dimension of the westerly extension of the project. 2 . Applicant's plans for the balance of TL 1400. 3 . Questions pertaining to cost of units Mr. Vail responded to these questions. Attendees were then asked to come forward to get a closer look at the site plan and to have informal conversations with Mr. Vail and Mr. Naff, the project designer. Mr. Vail distributed his business card and ask anyone who may come up with other questions later on to give him a call . Meeting adjourned at 7:45 pm. Adt ',Jo) — 13_11q12- 1 NAvki-a- 72, ( 44 1;I ►x.17.,... /�/��y 5 w. /76 Ph c �C r-s- z HILLVIEW COMMONS Revised Plan TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT E ( -3o--9-1 Robert Keech Associates, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineer 1225 NW Murray Boulevard, Suite 111 Portland,OR 97229• (503)641-6333 Project#95.006 HILLVIEW COMMONS Revised Plan TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT February 28, 1996 Table of Contents Traffic Analysis Outline Traffic Analysis Report Appendix A-Vicinity Map Appendix B -Site Traffic Generation Appendix C -Site Traffic Distribution Apprendix D - Site Traffic Assignment Appendix E - Existing Traffic Flow Appendix F -Traffic Growth Appendix G - Intersection Analysis . Af PlC A \ ALYSIS 0 , I LI \ Determination of Determination of Appendix E Survey of Proposed Surrounding Land use activity Land use patters Existing Traffic Flow ► r Appendix B Appendix C Estimation of Estimate of Trip Generation Trip Distribution [Appendix G—I I 1 r Appendix D Existing Traffic Site Traffic Projection Assignment I f Existing + Site Traffic Appendix F Projections Estimation of Traffic Growth Total Traffic Intersection Analysis Robert < EECH ASSCCI ATES , I \ C . CO \JSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1225 NW Murray Blvd., Suite 111, PORTLAND, OR (503) 641-6333 HILLVIEW COMMONS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT February 27, 1996 Introduction: This report is a supplement to the Hillview Commons Traffic Analysis Report completed on February 15, 1995. This site was originally proposed to contain 90 multi-family housing units. It is now proposed to contain 126 units. The site is located south of Bull Mountain Road near the intersection of Pacific Highway. No changes to the two driveways on Bull Mountain Road are proposed. Area Analysis: This report investigates Bull Mountain Road from McFarland Boulevard to Pacific Highway. Circulation Alternatives: Only the existing circulation layout (direct access to Bull Mountain Road) was reviewed. Findings: The existing traffic flow within the study area is summarized in Table A. These measurements were made February, 1996. TABLE A EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW (1) STREET AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Bull Mountain Road 659 Vehicles/Hour 778 Vehicles/Hour Pacific Highway 3,220 Vehicles/Hour 3,700 Vehicles/Hour (1) Two-way traffic flow KEECH ASSOCIATES, INC. HILLVIEW COMMONS Page 2 The trip generation for the proposed 126 multi-family units of the site is estimated at about 819 trip ends per day, with a peak hour generation of 79 trips/hour during the PM peak. This is a 40 percent increase over the current plan. (See Appendix B - Site Traffic Generation.) The anticipated level of service for the driveways is "B". This reflects no change from the original study. This evaluation includes future traffic growth comprised of traffic from a proposed 194-unit multi-family development west of the subject site and an 10 percent increase to existing traffic. A left turn refuge on Bull Mountain Road is planned for the east driveway, required by the current 90-unit plan. The west driveway is anticipated to have only 6 vehicles per hour (less than 1 percent of the westbound traffic), with a conflicting flow of 350 vehicles per hour. This would not be a sufficient traffic condition to warrant a left turn refuge. There are two driveways on the north side of Bull Mountain Road that serve a church. These driveways are not anticipated to be a problem, in that they have relatively low volumes except during the Sunday morning service, when the subject apartment traffic will be low. The Pacific Highway at Bull Mountain Road intersection currently operates at a level of service of "B". The inclusion of the site traffic and traffic growth is not anticipated to change this level of service. An operational analysis of the Bull Mountain Road at Pacific Highway indicated vehicle queues on the Bull Mountain Road reaching a length of nearly 300 feet (maximum anticipated under total traffic conditions, PM peak hour). The east driveway (nearest to Pacific Highway) is about 350 feet (stop line to stop line). It is possible that as traffic flow on Bull Mountain Road increases, vehicle queues would increase beyond the estimated 300 feet. This situation is a "system" type problem, in that it would occur whether or not the subject development is allowed. Mitigation for this problem would include development KEECH ASSOCIATES, INC. HILLVIEW COMMONS Page 3 of an alternative to having all Bull Mountain Road eastbound traffic go through the Bull Mountain Road/Pacific Highway intersection, as presently occurs. Conclusion: The proposal to increase the Hillview Commons project from 90 units to 126 units is not anticipated to cause any significant impact over that which was identified in the February 15, 1995 report. Robert Keech, PE Traffic Engineer PE #8822 KEECH ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A Vicinity Map [ • s ' ‘",=1"..- -::--,-,:;� S�"�•� - +.`:.r .w.`was• I ; T 1 7 % ;. .�w.,...T v4letin r,. 1•� r • 'tom i'•�� . /nt nst `. • i��•. s,.. .''m 11111.1 "" Union e X 51a • WWII ■�■ � ,- \ 4 WASHINGTON q ' � ■ ®��E • . .,� 4 1111® 1 •'P .7.4.,"\Lostt.,..YYTT\\ (: r a:, altalhiallr..--MtirdWw411111 slowelmarom .:- S- aii _. , .. Trervillreamillita ' 4hiiiilli ' .-411*_ r uro SON r I. ryo y+• I, mig ,..,..c.,,,„...) p... iF �.na+ �' Sao, • . F i �d p verton ' 'P' �-.000aroc. •• i ...- ,:, ... •• � `Er 41Y• 110 Mr •r11i b pr OAAwow ill. .� MOCAYA ; 10 � g Coopr � •o •z /j-- 1 i .Mtn w t. Ao r ty w.t i s, ,... o � i t5 =, k - oo ` of 4�� f�invk r rroeflr—t�LBk= t'^"" "° I,An i ar. at n g cu.nw�, :‘,'+.; . • • Mtn 0 Sr M at b in � , b L K!n 1 '''r 0 n1 jriviCI 9 i ,_ w ' C .: . - 114011Asz%Gle•. •ru 41111111111115.. Ail - All . 'f t"' "0 Tualatin �� '0 • Alir. •:• •, . er--.1.4,, t ' ,•�west �, 111 • ood : '_ ,. • , \ Li n/ � •, • At11 Yp rn r wtrt p' r� • art " A+� orvt'tf `mss• �� '� i i Oregon j I P oA•110 c PA- '�.�'' ....,e _ L PAW.a 110 rllYt 110 L— d- - - - -- ' + I 9 rOOlf r AYAr. 110 •Ovw.f a0 —--——T——— st11 - I cM1 a r wo APPENDIX B Site Traffic Generation SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Hillview Commons AM PM SITE Prior Site (90 Units) 46 Trips/Hour 57 Trips/Hour 585 Trips/Day New Proposal (126 Units) 65 Trips/Hour 79 Trips/Hour 819 Trips/Day Change 19 Trips/Hour 22 Trips/Hour 234 Trips/Day PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Hillview Commons SITE USE: Apartments (ITE Land Use Code 220) SITE SIZE: 126 Units ' UNADUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unit ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unit TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 819.0 trips/day PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 7.9 % AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 65.0 trips/hour AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.17 in/total AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 11.0 trips/hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 54.0 trips/hour PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 9.7 PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 57.0 trips/hour PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.68 in/total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 54.0 trips/hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 25.0 trips/hour Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition (ITE, 1991) (1) From Phil McHugh APPENDIX C Site Traffic Distribution APPENDIX C Site Traffic Distribution Site traffic distribution based on observations of existing traffic flows and general land use patterns. � z At � hTr► � h Tr► � Z Bull Vtn load Cob /� � f , 2o _ � , 1 a-- , Robert o KCH ASSOCIATES I \ C . �� CO\SULTI \G TRAFFIC E\GPI \EEC Q° 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 15031 641-6333 HILLVIEW COVVO \ S S I TE Trukr�-a_ oisi,ounw.) APPENDIX D Site Traffic Assignment Z 2 r://\t‘. 4(-1.1:1+► 111. N1 ► r8 3s 4‘ e 4 7> _,,, i 7/4 Z Bull V to load \ \ 7///, Robert ,, .) , < EEC - ASSOCIATES I \ C10 0 CONSULTING TRAFFIC E \GPI\EER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 HILLVIEW COvVO \ S it) - ii SITE TRAFFIC- AS.5ItitOYA6ttJ7 90' • ;;w Am Pt-v,,v. 4,02_ Z1 4- /c N� or 4-J-4.-4, .0 (o 4,14 3cl ' 3 -- +I Tr 3 -�� 11"1' 6 �y ■ _r mM 3 -;,1 �JUII Vtn X000 fy // a� Robert . �' KCH ASSOCIAIS I \ C1 (.(. CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER \/ : 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 (5031 641-6333 HILLVIEW COVVO \ S S I TE T2A F F(,L A 5S I rJ 'v J-1-- PM ana,‘.._ { \G,Li FL. APPENDIX E Existing Traffic Flow APPENDIX E ExistingTraffic Flow Existing traffic flow as measured in February, 1996. C i ... -? # t t 7�� -} tr■ S 171'14 /4 4 15r 455 7__-_!, Z ^0,TA • Bull Vtn load \ \/ ■ ,//// 4. Robert < EEC - ASSOCIATES I \ C1 a6 CONSULTING TRAFFIC E \ �I \EER .. 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD, PORTLAND, OR 97229 )503) 641-6333 HILLVIEW COVVO \ S EXISTIi3cn 'rRAFr Ft,,,) /oa7s INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY A T= 8.7% P=. 903 N 1160 DATE OF COUNT: 02/13/96 A O 2060 DAY OF WEEK: Tue R 113 1047 0 TIME STARTED: 07 :00 T TIME ENDED: 09 :00 H 4-204 4J 1 L. r0 321 A L0 T= 4 .4% T= 0% 0 -► *-0 P=.795 P=0 . 4-1 1 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME 134 . r•r0 T=%'TRUCKS BY APPROACH � P=PHF BY APPROACH 455 -► 0 -► 91 1739 0 Peak Hour 11181 A 07:25-08 :25 Traffic Smithy + T= 5. 9% P=. 973 11830 TEV=3445 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD A • A FROM - TO - -► J ,J 1 L. 47 1 no-r4- L ALL 07 :00-07 :05 8 0 21 7 93 0 6 117 0 0 0 0 252 07 :05-07 :10 7 0 18 6 83 0 7 138 0 0 0 0 259 07 :10-07: 15 14 0 34 5 80 0 5 120 0 0 0 0 258 07:15-07:20 10 0 27 7 89 0 5 145 0 0 0 0 283 07:20-07 :25 12 0 24 7 76 0 11 124 0 0 0 0 254 07 :25-07 :30 6 0 17 10 100 0 4 165 0 0 0 0 302 07 :30-07 :35 20 0 30 13 96 0 5 136 0 0 0 0 300 07 :35-07 :40 16 0 32 9 93 0 7 139 0 0 0 0 296 07 :40-07 :45 17 0 28 8 88 0 6 138 0 0 0 0 285 07 :45-07 :50 14 0 34 9 86 0 8 145 0 0 0 0 296 07:50-07 :55 8 0 22 6 101 0 11 132 0 0 0 0 280 07:55-08 :00 11 0 28 5 75 0 7 150 0 0 0 0 276 08 :00-08 : 05 6 0 17 15 95 0 13 137 0 0 0 0 283 08 :05-08 :10 14 0 26 7 66 0 6 157 0 0 0 0 276 08 :10-08 :15 14 0 34 8 90 0 6 141 0 0 0 0 293 08 :15-08 :20 5 0 27 13 57 0 14 142 0 0 0 0 258 08 :20-08 :25 3 0 26 10 100 0 4 157 0 0 0 0 300 08 :25-08 :30 13 0 31 9 94 0 7 83 0 0 0 0 237 08 :30-08 :35 9 0 16 15 96 0 10 108 0 0 0 0 254 08 :35-08 :40 13 0 25 17 88 0 11 95 0 0 0 0 249 08 :40-08 :45 10 0 18 14 86 0 8 133 0 0 0 0 269 08 :45-08 :50 9 0 20 14 92 0 9 126 0 0 0 0 270 08 :50-08 :55 7 0 13 17 80 0 8 114 0 0 0 0 239 08 :55-09 :00 7 0 20 9 88 0 8 112 0 0 0 0 244 Total Survey 253 0 588 240 2092 0 186 3154 0 0 0 0 6513 PHF . 63 0 .85 .88 . 91 0 .73 . 98 0 0 0 0 . 959 % Trucks 9 . 1 0 2 .4 12 .5 8.3 0 22 4 . 9 0 0 0 0 6 .7 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 07:00-08 :00 143 0 315 92 1060 0 82 1649 0 0 0 0 3341 07:15-08 :15 148 0 319 104 1055 0 89 1709 0 0 0 0 3424 07:30-08 :30 141 0 335 112 1041 0 94 1657 0 0 0 0 3380 07:45-08 :45 120 0 304 128 1034 0 105 1580 0 0 0 0 3271 -i 08 :00-09 :00 110 0 273 148 1032 0 104 1505 0 0 0 0 3172 j.t_--- ,5,.., I ,.,, L.„ 4. 43, t � �505 Z��C� ��14, .L�► .� 4f� ?I0' Z 3 S �'1'r® 6S 4 v. AI� 1� 5ull Vtn oac I ,c Hobert ,,o (.-. KH A I \ C1 0 CO\S,,LTI \G TRAFFIC E\G�INEER k 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 HILLVIEW COVvO \ S ax 1ST 10 &I TIZ A,F f c_ F L oi.J pm F?EAv_ INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT PACIFIC HIGHWAY • T= 1.9% P=.968 N 2061 ♦ DATE OF COUNT: 02/13/96 O 11619 DAY OF WEEK: Tue R 344 1717 0 TIME STARTED: 16 :30 T TIME ENDED: 18 :30 H i-505 4J 1 L. 4-0 •208 -I L0 T= 2.3% T= 0% 0 —► 4-0 P=.812 P=0. 65 0 TEV=TO'T'AL ENTRY VOLUME ♦ r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH 47 I r► P=PHF BY APPROACH 273 —► 0 —► 161 1411 0 Peak Hour 11782 ♦ 17:00-18:00 Traffic Smithy i T= 2 .3% P=.905 11572 TEV=3906 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • ♦ FROM - TO —► �1.1 1 L.. ii ► _� _ ALL 16 :30-16:35 4 0 9 19 140 0 12 106 0 0 0 0 290 16 :35-16:40 4 0 15 29 134 0 13 121 0 0 0 0 316 16 :40-16:45 5 0 20 17 130 0 4 97 0 0 0 0 273 16 :45-16 :50 6 0 6 23 136 0 13 135 0 0 0 0 319 16 :50-16:55 5 0 18 22 149 0 12 122 0 0 0 0 328 16:55-17:00 1 0 17 29 119 0 14 110 0 0 0 0 290 17 :00-17:05 7 0 12 29 149 0 16 90 0 0 0 0 303 17:05-17:10 4 0 20 32 118 0 14 133 0 0 0 0 321 17:10-17:15 4 0 9 28 166 0 5 147 0 0 0 0 359 17:15-17:20 5 0 21 28 137 0 16 119 0 0 0 0 326 17:20-17:25 6 0 20 23 150 0 15 117 0 0 0 0 331 17:25-17:30 3 0 23 28 146 0 6 135 0 0 0 0 341 17:30-17:35 6 0 9 26 151 0 11 115 0 0 0 0 318 17:35-17:40 9 0 28 24 149 0 11 115 0 0 0 0 336 17:40-17:45 1 0 19 24 134 0 15 127 0 0 0 0 320 17:45-17:50 7 0 20 33 136 0 16 104 0 0 0 0 316 17:50-17:55 8 0 17 35 132 0 19 85 0 0 0 0 296 17:55-18:00 5 0 10 34 149 0 17 124 0 0 0 0 339 18:00-18:05 4 0 19 36 100 0 12 112 0 0 0 0 283 18 :05-18:10 8 0 19 18 103 0 18 79 0 0 0 0 245 18:10-18:15 7 0 10 29 135 0 17 93 0 0 0 0 291 18 :15-18:20 10 0 16 26 99 0 26 100 0 0 0 0 277 18 :20-18:25 6 0 22 19 149 0 15 101 0 0 0 0 312 18 :25-18:30 9 0 17 24 122 0 10 99 0 0 0 0 281 Total Survey 134 0 396 635 3233 0 327 2686 0 0 0 0 7411 PHF .81 0 .78 .84 .95 0 .77 .88 0 0 0 0 .961 % Trucks 6 0 1 .5 2.2 0 1.2 2.4 0 0 0 0 2.1 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16 :30-17:30 54 0 190 307 1674 0 140 1432 0 0 0 0 3797 16 :45-17:45 57 0 202 316 1704 0 148 1465 0 0 0 0 3892 17:00-18:00 65 0 208 344 1717 0 161 1411 0 0 0 0 3906 17:15-18:15 69 0 215 338 1622 0 173 1325 0 0 0 0 3742 17:30-18:30 80 0 206 328 1559 0 187 1254 0 0 0 0 3614 APPENDIX F Traffic Growth APPENDIX F Traffic Growth The traffic growth was assumed at a 10 percent increase in existing traffic on Pacific Highway and Bull Mountain Road, plus the traffic from a proposed 194-unit multi-family development directly to the west of the subject site. This increase is used to provide a level of service comparison for the immediate future. C :-.?: , AL AL ♦tTr■ ?r► 3o y �T I 16 ---0 l l b �N, o iy Bull Vtn load \ \ ■ Pr r .., p 7 , a..- ,c- Robert ,, < EEC - ASSOCIATES I \ C1 (_ CONSULTING TRAFFIC E\G�I \ EER � 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 HILLVIEW COV \ O \ S TRA E f c_ ca.12_a w-r4 AM PcA14- 414 ti°� IV �:C� �. 61 hTr► � 4i?ro '� �y �T 13L. 1I V to load \N \■ \ 1 ,1, or Ore r Fr / r. Hobert KCH ASSOCIATES I \ C, a� CO \ S"LTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER q 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD,, PORTLAND, OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 HILLVIEW COV V O \ S 1(2- FF►L C�g.c 4T 4 i Pm `PG-y K- 4,02- , APPENDIX G Intersection Analysis APPENDIX G Intersection Analysis Traffic Projections: Estimated Existing -Observed traffic from field measurements conducted February, 1995. The traffic generated by the current 90-unit plan for the site is included in the existing driveway analysis. Existing + Site - Existing traffic plus site as if site were built out as proposed (126 multi- family units). Total Traffic- Existing and site plus traffic growth. SUMMARY OF CAPACITY ANALYSIS HILLVIEW COMMONS Intersection Existing Existing + Site Total Traffic LOS LOS LOS Zip Bull Mountain Road at West Access (stop sign control) (1) AM Peak Hour (2)(3) A B B PM Peak Hour (2)(3) B B B Bull Mountain Road at East Access (stop sign control) (1) AM Peak Hour (2)(3) A B B PM Peak Hour (2)(3) A A A Bull Mountain Road at Pacific Highway (Signal control) (4) AM Peak Hour B B B PM Peak Hour B B B LOS = Level of Service (See Level of Service Criteria) (1) The level of service for stop sign controlled intersections is calculated for each stop or yielding movement. Generally, the side street left turn movement has the poorest LOS as illustrated in the Summary of Capacity Analysis. This LOS may be experienced by only a few vehicles (those making the left turn), whereas the average LOS of all vehicles entering the intersection would be much better. (2) Existing volume at the west and east accesses includes an estimation of traffic generated from current plan. (3) The access approaches are shared use for the right and left turn movements. The level of service reflects the delay experienced by the average vehicle. An approach may have a better level of service even though it may have more traffic This is possible if a higher percentage of right turning traffic is present. (4) Based on the 1994 HCM methodology. LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Reserve Capacity(1) LOS Expected Delay to Minor vehicles/hour Street Traffic >400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0-99 E Very long traffic delays * F * (1 ) Reserve Capacity = Adjusted Capacity - Demand LOS = Level of Service *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. Source: "Highway Capacity Manual"; Special Report 209; Transportation Research Board (1985). LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Level of service A Describes operations with very low delay, i.e., less than 5.0 sec per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Level of service B Describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 sec per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. Level of service C Describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 sec per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass throught the intersection without stopping. Level of service D Describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 sec per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level of service E Descibes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Level of Service F Describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1 .00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Source: "Highway Capacity Manual"; Special Report 209; Transportation Research Board (1985). J 4_ 2o,4 455 --' 41 ? 14 47t1+ Existing Site � ZO� t—' 1L► � Z 45s h ? r-► _t 41 t Existing + Site iii � Z Z Traffic Growth co Total Traffic HILLVIEW COMMONS Robert 76°" rv�„ l�ccess�o� uJesr KEeC — ASSOCIATS I \ C. CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENG�(NEER /4N\ Pts,a' �-ptifz. 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 1503) 641-6333 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name Streets : (N-S) West Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 Other Information AM) EXIST-WC/7 t S 11E Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1< 0 0> 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 455 1 2 207 6 0 8 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE ' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 456 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 813 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 813 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 456 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1039 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1039 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 TH Saturation Flow Rate : (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 664 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 489 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 488 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 664 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 437 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 436 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 7 436 > > > 590 6 . 3 B 6 . 3 NB R 9 813 > > > WB L 2 1039 3 .5 A 0 . 0 Intersection Delay = 0 . 1 .. J Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name Streets : (N-S) West Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 A'vl1 TO TA L —T2A i ( L Other Information '�'I Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1< 0 0> 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 571 1 2 241 6 0 8 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 572 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 710 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 710 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 572 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 915 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 915 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 TH Saturation Flow Rate : (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate : (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 814 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 408 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 407 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 814 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 358 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 357 • Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh (pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 7 357 > > > 496 7 . 5 B 7 . 5 NB R 9 710 > > > WB L 2 915 3 . 9 A 0 . 0 Intersection Delay = 0 . 1 4_ sos N1L► 2-13 4-itr4 N1L► •�► �h Existing S ? �► e � M � Site 4_ 50u, AgE Existing + Site co Z � ‘ZS Traffic Growth 4-1 .1. 14 3. -) (,) m Total Traffic HILLVIEW COVMO \S Hobert \�vs,- Aces CONSULTING TRAFFIC T�ROAFFATENG�INEER E 'l P M Paw N-ov z- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 X5031 641-6333 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name Streets : (N-S) West Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 '�t Other Information �'" a)<154 + SITE Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - --- - - - - -- -- ---- - --- ---- - --- - - -- - --- -- -- - -- - - - - - No. Lanes 0 1< 0 0> 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 276 6 6 506 3 0 3 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE ' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 40 1 i ... r....,..:_.... Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 279 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1000 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1000 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 282 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1258 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1258 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 TH Saturation Flow Rate : (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate : (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 791 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 419 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 415 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 791 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 369 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 366 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 3 366 > > > 536 6 . 8 B 6 . 8 NB R 3 1000 > > > WB L 7 1258 2 . 9 A 0 . 0 Intersection Delay = 0 . 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name Streets : (N-S) West Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 f)r•I� felrL ,rn+��FE L Other Information 1- I•I Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - --- ---- No. Lanes 0 1< 0 0> 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 337 6 6 625 3 0 3 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE ' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 340 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 931 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 931 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 343 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1177 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1177 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 TH Saturation Flow Rate : (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate : (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 971 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 337 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 334 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 971 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 290 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 287 } ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary ' FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App ' NB L 3 287 > > > 439 8 . 3 B 8 . 3 NB R 3 931 > > > WB L 7 1177 3 .1 A 0 . 0 Intersection Delay = 0 . 1 1 1 1 I 201 4-14- 4 Z 455 -4 41 4 I� � 1 �► � 8 Z 4-1 , existing Site � N1L► � 8 hTr■ 4{.3 -4 l �r 4-11-1* � S r* xisting + Site Ilb 240 Traffic Growth S t � Total Traffic HILLVIEW COVVONS Robert ASSOCIATES IBC , `b" �� rn-� � R„� R``� CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER � A`c-M ?-e-r" )4,+R- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 (5031 641-6333 I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** I File Name Streets : (N-S) East Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW I Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 Other Information Aset Ex13i-1k.40_ S11L- ITwo-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I ---L T -__R -__L _--T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1< 0 1 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N I Volumes PHF 463 1 8 206 3 0 37 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 I MC' s (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s {o} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 I IAdjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ILeft Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 I Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 40 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 464 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 806 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 806 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 95 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 464 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1030 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1030 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 678 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 481 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 477 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 678 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 429 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 425 j Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh (pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 3 425 > > > 761 5 . 0 B 5 . 0 NB R 43 806 > > > WB L 9 1030 3 . 5 A 0 . 1 Intersection Delay = 0 . 3 1 I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name Streets : (N-S) East Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 A M 1U-4ArL .t.�} l- Other Information f� Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - --- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1< 0 1 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 579 1 8 240 3 0 37 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 580 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 704 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 704 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 94 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 580 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 907 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 907 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 99 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 828 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 401 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 397 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 828 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 351 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 348 HE'S: *****�U * g* a*, Center Pcr nt ***** ****** 1 n �mAuters ******R **a *e 2 �ranSAorra **** do IV oVement v�owRate InterseC�1pn P ********** * Page 8 L - -AcAh} CrnVeCaA erforman ****** NS R 3 - _�___ C h redca ce Summar WE 43 1 348 (pCAhP p�9 ?'flta y L lay 1 X04 9 660 ''--_ 907 ` LpS Delay Inters 5. 9 - 8y AAA e-Laon Delay 4 0 3 B 5. 9 0.3 A 0. 2 J j 4- 505 ,C S ♦1 T f� 7:73 4-11 �-► X39 S +I Existing 3 Site f- sti NIL► � 3� Z S h1r-► 2.76 4- 1\ _ w NV Existing + Site S ♦1 T r-► Z +- cps() Traffic Growth S � T � 337 — co 3 --4r Total Traffic HILLVIEW CONNONS Robert `b,„ m��, po� 6_ T �«S KC — ASBOIATB I \ C. S 20TRAFFIC Y � N5PM Pe., ,c Nvti,z 1225 NW MURRAY MUR AY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 0364 63 641-6333 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name Streets : (N-S) East Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 Gx i s1`. + 5 �T1 Other Information PM Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1< 0 1 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 276 3 39 511 1 0 18 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE ' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 278 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1001 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1001 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 98 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 279 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1262 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1262 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 96 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 828 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 401 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 387 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 828 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 351 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 338 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v (pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 1 338 > > > 919 4 . 0 A 4 . 0 NB R 21 1001 > > > WB L 45 1262 3 . 0 A 0 . 2 Intersection Delay = 0 . 2 j • Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name Streets : (N-S) East Access (E-W) Bull Mtn Road Major Street DirectionEW Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst R Keech Date of Analysis 2/23/96 Other Information nP41� I„ -L Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1< 0 1 1 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 337 3 39 630 1 0 18 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV' s (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE' s 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 .60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 338 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 933 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 933 Prob. of Queue-free State : 0 . 98 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 340 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1181 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1181 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0 . 96 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1008 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 323 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 311 Prob. of Queue-free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1008 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 276 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 265 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS : Unsignalized Intersection Release 2 . 1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v (pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 1 265 > > > 837 4 .4 A 4 . 4 NB R 21 933 > > > WB L 45 1181 3 .2 A 0 . 2 Intersection Delay = 0 . 2 r 0 4— At_ 37_ ) 4-14h4 n ' - 13 a- rn 35 S Existing ♦1T � 10 Site 4- ss6 +I ? I+ 'rI 87 S � T xisting + Site Traffic Growth 443 1. 4-i ? r+ -1-+ - Total Traffic HILLVIEW CON VONS Robert �AclF,c � *". w�, AT ��,, �,4„ o�d KCH ABBOIATS I \ C . I CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER P `�- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 (5031 641-6333 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Volume Worksheet 51 21 Q A I xISTlnlGi1 AP\ EBL EaR NBL NBT SCI6 Volume(vph.) 321 134 91 1739 1047 113 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Util. Factor 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph.) 338 141 96 1831 1102 119 Lane Group Flow 348 141 96 1922 1157 119 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet El Q © Q Q BBL NBL NaI au aaR Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Stops(#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.996 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 1 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary M L J Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? NA Both Prot Prot Perm Both Adj. Flow (vph.) 348 141 96 1922 1157 119 Prot. Satd. Flow 3540 1583 1770 3725 1583 Perm. Satd. Flow 1583 3725 1583 Green Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.12 0.80 0.66 0.81 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 531 422 206 2980 2452 1280 V/C Ratio 0.66 0.33 0.46 0.64 0.47 0.09 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 36.5 25.1 37.6 3.8 7.7 1.4 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 2.0 0.2 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 Delay 38.6 25.3 38.8 4.1 7.8 1.4 LOS D C D A B A Cycle Length: 120 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 61% Intersection V/C Ratio: 65% Intersection Delay: 10.0 Intersection LOS: B Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 2 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Lanes,Volumes,and Timings Summary Q Q 0 EBL EBR NBL N I $BI Volume(vph.) 321 134 91 1739 1047 113 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 348 141 96 1922 1157 119 Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Satd. Flow(Prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Satd. Flow(Perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Left Turn Type Prot Perm Phase Number 4 5 2 6 Phase Lagging? Yes Current Split(s.) 21 17 99 82 Yellow Time(s.) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 V/C Ratio 0.66 0.33 0.46 0.64 0.47 0.09 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 39 25 39 4 8 1 Level of Service D C D A B A Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0(0%), Referenced to phase 2-NBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 65% Intersection Delay: 10.0 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY jJ2 4 99 '421 17 082 .111 I6 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 3 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Queue Lengths, and Potential Blocking Problems M Q Q Q III Q Lane Group EBL EBR IB NI $BT Ste¢R Lane Group Volume 348 141 96 1922 1157 119 Queue Length (ft.) 136 91 74 330 238 17 Link Length (ft.) 3021 3021 1760 1760 1710 1710 %of Link Used 5% 3% 4% 19% 14% 1% Blocks Upstream? %of cycles avg. block time Storage Length (ft.) % of storage Used Fills Storage? % of cycles avg. block time i Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 4 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Volume Worksheet EE EBR Q Q S© SBR EX si ik)ci +SITE , AM Volume (vph.) 356 144 94 1739 1047 120 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Util. Factor 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph.) 375 152 99 1831 1102 126 Lane Group Flow 386 152 99 1922 1157 126 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet II © Q Q Q EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.996 0.850 0.850 FIt Protected 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.850 0.850 FIt Perm. 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 1 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary R El Q Q © Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? NA Both Prot Prot Perm Both Adj. Flow(vph.) 386 152 99 1922 1157 126 Prot. Satd. Flow 3540 1583 1770 3725 1583 Perm. Satd. Flow 1583 3725 1583 Green Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.12 0.80 0.66 0.81 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 531 422 206 2980 2452 1280 V/C Ratio 0.73 0.36 0.48 0.64 0.47 0.10 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 37.0 25.3 37.7 3.8 7.7 1.4 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 3.4 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 Delay 40.4 25.6 39.0 4.1 7.8 1.4 LOS D D D A B A Cycle Length: 120 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 63% Intersection V/C Ratio: 66% Intersection Delay: 10.5 Intersection LOS: B Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 2 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary I�`� � (( - � L:.:J Q Q l:.,J EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 356 144 94 1739 1047 120 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 386 152 99 1922 1157 126 Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Satd. Flow(Prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Left Turn Type Prot Perm Phase Number 4 5 2 6 Phase Lagging? Yes Current Split(s.) 21 17 99 82 Yellow Time (s.) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 V/C Ratio 0.73 0.36 0.48 0.64 0.47 0.10 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 40 26 39 4 8 1 Level of Service D D D A B A Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-NBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 66% Intersection Delay: 10.5 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY 1.1 2 4 99 21 17 82 5 I6 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 3 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Queue Lengths, and Potential Blocking Problems 51 El III 11 11 :11 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Volume 386 152 99 1922 1157 126 Queue Length (ft.) 153 99 77 330 238 18 Link Length (ft.) 3021 3021 1760 1760 1710 1710 % of Link Used 5% 3% 4% 19% 14% 1% Blocks Upstream? % of cycles avg. block time Storage Length (ft.) % of storage Used Fills Storage? % of cycles avg. block time Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 4 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Volume Worksheet © Q Q Q Q Q [6TH , mgr--R � AM EBR NBA NII SCI aBR Volume (vph.) 443 174 106 1912 1157 142 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Util. Factor 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph.) 466 183 112 2013 1218 149 Lane Group Flow 480 183 112 2113 1279 149 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet 111 II MI II 11.1 EBL EBR NEL Mai 5111 SBR Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.996 0.850 0.850 FIt Protected 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.850 0.850 FIt Perm. 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 1 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary 511 121 13I Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? NA Both Prot Prot Perm Both Adj. Flow(vph.) 480 183 112 2113 1279 149 Prot. Satd. Flow 3540 1583 1770 3725 1583 Perm. Satd. Flow 1583 3725 1583 Green Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.12 0.80 0.66 0.81 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 531 422 206 2980 2452 1280 V/C Ratio 0.90 0.43 0.54 0.71 0.52 0.12 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 38.1 25.9 38.0 4.2 8.1 1.4 Prog. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 13.4 0.5 2.2 0.6 0.2 0.0 Delay 51.5 26.4 40.2 4.8 8.3 1.4 LOS E D D A B A Cycle Length: 120 Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 70% Intersection V/C Ratio: 74% Intersection Delay: 12.7 Intersection LOS: B Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 2 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Lanes,Volumes,and Timings Summary El 21 Q Q 31 EBL EBR NBL Z $�T SBR Volume(vph.) 443 174 106 1912 1157 142 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 480 183 112 2113 1279 149 Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Satd. Flow(Prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Satd. Flow(Perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Left Turn Type Prot Perm Phase Number 4 5 2 6 Phase Lagging? Yes Current Split(s.) 21 17 99 82 Yellow Time(s.) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 V/C Ratio 0.90 0.43 0.54 0.71 0.52 0.12 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Average Delay (s.) 52 26 40 5 8 1 • Level of Service E D D A B A Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-NBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 74% Intersection Delay: 12.7 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY � 2 S 4 99 21 17 82 J5 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 3 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Queue Lengths, and Potential Blocking Problems Q Q Q Q Q Q Lane Group BBL EBB NBL NBT SBR Lane Group Volume 480 183 112 2113 1279 149 Queue Length (ft.) 196 122 87 406 277 22 Link Length (ft.) 3021 3021 1760 1760 1710 1710 % of Link Used 6% 4% 5% 23% 16% 1% Blocks Upstream? % of cycles avg. block time Storage Length (ft.) % of storage Used Fills Storage? % of cycles avg. block time Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 4 Z°8 S i r■ 15 S E= xisting Sit e M �' Z22, Ak yrl 47 ,tr+ E= xisting + S to - c.L 4- 4■ ■IV Traffic Growth Z7e t 8S Total Traffic HILLVIEW COVVO \ S fobert "bull 06RDA-0 KCH ASSOCIATB I \ 0 , y CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENG5I\ EER PM -P `` 14-01^12- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 1503) 641-6333 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Volume Worksheet 151 IR MI El El MI EBL EBR NBL NBT SBR PM E Xt sT &1 Volume(vph.) 208 65 161 1411 1717 344 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Util. Factor 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph.) 219 68 169 1485 1807 362 Lane Group Flow 226 68 169 1560 1898 362 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet 51 Q Q Q Q Q ERL ma join EI I Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.995 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Frt Perm. 0.995 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 1 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary El Q Q Q Q Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Perm. or Prot.? NA Both Prot Prot Perm Both Adj. Flow(vph.) 226 68 169 1560 1898 362 Prot. Satd. Flow 3536 1583 1770 3725 1583 Perm. Satd. Flow 1583 3725 1583 Green Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.12 0.80 0.66 0.81 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 530 422 206 2980 2452 1280 V/C Ratio 0.43 0.16 0.82 0.52 0.77 0.28 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 35.2 23.9 39.3 3.1 10.8 1.7 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 14.9 0.1 1.1 0.0 Delay 30.2 20.4 48.3 2.8 10.3 1.5 LOS D C E A B A Cycle Length: 120 Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 67% Intersection V/C Ratio: 72% Intersection Delay: 9.6 Intersection LOS: B Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 2 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Lanes,Volumes, and Timings Summary 51 Lad Q Q W EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 208 65 161 1411 1717 344 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 226 68 169 1560 1898 362 Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Left Turn Type Prot Perm Phase Number 4 5 2 6 Phase Lagging? Yes Current Split(s.) 21 17 99 82 Yellow Time (s.) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 V/C Ratio 0.43 0.16 0.82 0.52 0.77 0.28 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 30 20 48 3 10 1 Level of Service D C E A B A Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-NBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 72% Intersection Delay: 9.6 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY J2 4 99 21 17 82 J5 116 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 3 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Queue Lengths, and Potential Blocking lad I� LJ U r Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Volume 226 68 169 1560 1898 362 Queue Length (ft.) 85 41 137 223 550 65 Link Length (ft.) 3021 3021 1760 1760 1710 1710 % of Link Used 3% 1% 8% 13% 32% 4% Blocks Upstream? % of cycles avg. block time Storage Length (ft.) of storage Used Fills Storage? % of cycles avg. block time Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 4 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Volume Worksheet Q Q Q Q EBL EBR NFL N131 NB p►t nn 1� Volume(vph.) 223 71 172 1411 1717 378 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Util. Factor 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph.) 235 75 181 1485 1807 398 Lane Group Flow 242 75 181 1560 1898 398 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet 51 Q 21 Q Q Q EBR ■BL MU SDI SBR Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Stops(#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.996 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Frt Perm. 0.996 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 1 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary El Q Q Q Lane Group EB EBR NBL NBT P alfft Perm. or Prot.? NA Both Prot Prot Perm Both Adj. Flow(vph.) 242 75 181 1560 1898 398 Prot. Satd. Flow 3540 1583 1770 3725 1583 Perm. Satd. Flow 1583 3725 1583 Green Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.12 0.80 0.66 0.81 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 531 422 206 2980 2452 1280 V/C Ratio 0.46 0.18 0.88 0.52 0.77 0.31 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 35.3 24.0 39.6 3.1 10.8 1.7 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 21.9 0.1 1.1 0.0 Delay 30.5 20.5 55.6 2.8 10.3 1.5 LOS D C E A B A Cycle Length: 120 Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 68% Intersection V/C Ratio: 74% Intersection Delay: 10.0 Intersection LOS: B Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 2 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary U El R Q Q EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 223 71 172 1411 1717 378 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 242 75 181 1560 1898 398 Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3540 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Left Turn Type Prot Perm Phase Number 4 5 2 6 Phase Lagging? Yes Current Split (s.) 21 17 99 82 Yellow Time (s.) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 V/C Ratio 0.46 0.18 0.88 0.52 0.77 0.31 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 30 20 56 3 10 2 Level of Service D C E A B A Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-NBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 74% Intersection Delay: 10.0 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY J2 „4 99 21 17 82 J 5 kl 6 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 3 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Queue Lengths, and Potential Blocking f Problems [..4_1. Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Group Volume 242 75 181 1560 1898 398 Queue Length (ft.) 91 46 148 223 550 73 Link Length (ft.) 3021 3021 1760 1760 1710 1710 % of Link Used 3% 2% 8% 13% 32% 4% Blocks Upstream? % of cycles avg. block time Storage Length (ft.) % of storage Used Fills Storage? % of cycles avg. block time Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 4 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Volume Worksheet al El VI :II E5BBL E�B�R NB NCI I B {�►'►'1 `1a lT Volume(vph.) 270 85 204 1551 1887 565 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Util. Factor 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 Adj. Flow(vph.) 284 89 215 1633 1986 595 Lane Group Flow 293 89 215 1714 2086 595 Lane and Saturated Flow Worksheet © Q 21 Q EBR NBL NBT 5_13.I SBR Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Ideal Flow(vphpl.) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Shared Lane? No No No Lane Width (ft.) 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Area Type Other Other Other Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Stops (#/hr.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr.) Frt Protected 0.995 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Frt Perm. 0.995 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.954 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 1 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis Summary 111 111 21 II El :11 Lane Group EH_ Mal hal I SBR Perm. or Prot.? NA Both Prot Prot Perm Both Adj. Flow(vph.) 293 89 215 1714 2086 595 Prot. Satd. Flow 3536 1583 1770 3725 1583 Perm. Satd. Flow 1583 3725 1583 Green Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.12 0.80 0.66 0.81 Lane Grp. Cap. (vph.) 530 422 206 2980 2452 1280 V/C Ratio 0.55 0.21 1.04 0.58 0.85 0.46 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 35.9 24.3 40.5 3.4 12.1 2.1 Prog. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 1.0 0.0 61.5 0.2 2.2 0.2 Delay 31.5 20.7 96.0 3.1 12.5 2.0 LOS D C F A B A Cycle Length: 120 Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 76% Intersection V/C Ratio: 83% Intersection Delay: 12.9 Intersection LOS: B Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 2 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Lanes, Volumes, and Timings (Suu�mmary I� I�J EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (vph.) 270 85 204 1551 1887 565 Adj. Lane Grp. Vol. 293 89 215 1714 2086 595 Lanes 2 1 1 2 2 1 Satd. Flow (Prot.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Satd. Flow (Perm.) 3536 1583 1770 3725 3725 1583 Left Turn Type Prot Perm Phase Number 4 5 2 6 Phase Lagging? Yes Current Split(s.) 21 17 99 82 Yellow Time (s.) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 V/C Ratio 0.55 0.21 1.04 0.58 0.85 0.46 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Average Delay (s.) 31 21 96 3 12 2 Level of Service D C F A B A Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2-NBT, Begin Of Green Intersection V/C Ratio: 83% Intersection Delay: 12.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY T12 "j d 99 21 17 82 jI5 I6 Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy, Robert Keech Page 3 BULL MTN ROAD & PACIFIC HIGHWAY October 31, 1995 Queue Lengths, and Potential Blocking Problems 51 II Q Q Q MI Lane Group EBLL EBR NBL NBT I SBR Lane Group Volume 293 89 215 1714 2086 595 Queue Length (ft.) 113 55 179 264 674 132 Link Length (ft.) 3021 3021 1760 1760 1710 1710 %of Link Used 4% 2% 10% 15% 39% 8% Blocks Upstream? %of cycles avg. block time Storage Length (ft.) % of storage Used Fills Storage? %of cycles avg. block time Synchro 2.0 Report C:\SYNCHRO2\BULL.SY4 Traffic Smithy,Robert Keech Page 4 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 05/21/96 12:19 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Ij001/002 • p *R *I *D* E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 (503)625-6177 TELEPHONE: (503) 625-6177 FAX # (503) 625-6179 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: S^ OZl ` 1 b TO: eA,, fIi5Q TELEPHONE: FAX NUMBER: ATTENTION: FROM: WE ARE SENDING 3 PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) . IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL US AS SOON A POSSIBLE. THANK YOU! -, rrintea on uu70 recyclea paper. i 1 ers,,co /I ' V / --6 .. -- / / / ,/ •ii 0 WiltkiwNli ...- .,,,..,...„.............-., , ..._ .., ,... _ ......00, , ..-- - . 0S t° ■# -• , .41000.-- 11,‘ ..... ' AV 40 ii It 00 •10 foo % goisiN - -411e4tio•-. • , OW. 3-1-67 : - .1.-°° =6;5% * DE r 1 ..,. .. , _......___ .i... I ..e**. ......,_ . v I 1,---' it .agri. -2 ' • ji .- - ,.,.. --' gip- 10'......-0111E110 WOW • .. .,,...---' > "/;,f. ; al. ...-- xv0 . 4d, w --,- ---Ill i"' /414Y(41 Di" . .-----. 280 11T .....1/2031("K-erpi- ----- Is, 'AVN• IC ----- . gm, 5 TO 4 HIGH SIG %. ' . HT .-.. -'..m v11 I ry 4 ' ..• . . 5OE "4 IR . -.' 210 -1 -ISLE - pp. - - III 4.11111Eli/ il -I 4'- .------1--wpirp- -7 wrzer*: I- II EN -Y BRIe . 14111111".111 ,, __,in, 1 rig /1---- 'D li. 3 'D 3 'C' 3 .C. tA- y > AN 1m ie. , 4 AM ow " -iii Rill Ill .• iiii6 ' 7. - --—--• . . ao _j_ 1...p Lk , „ , ir1/4 ) 1 3- P 46 EX151- \ \ BLDG. TRANSMITTAL Harris-McMonagle Associates Engineers - Surveyors 12555 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 TEL. (503) 639-3453 - Fax 639-1232 TO: acit hei,h. RECEIVED MAY 3 7 1ggF Cam COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EVELOPMENT DATE: 5/?0/G/ PROJECT: 17,e6 WE ARE SENDING YOU ATTACHED THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: SHOP DRAWINGS PRINTS SAMPLES CHANGE ORDER COPY OF LETTER PLANS 'ATA SPECIFICATIONS MYLARS OTHER: FOR YOUR: COMMENTS APPROVAL USE FILE COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION REMARKS: /4)bri-e_ ‘e1/7 .493/1 7-- As,/ J-2-)1-"•,-.47, SIGNED: J `+ • c/5 �Q �s wD VI IOk$ rp,(n��t -�/f, kk — f✓' C �U/f lyca 1/OLj a-s *Q w 06/-t r °4410 KS 6 F-- NKe_s-e-p a ,✓eelS cure_ Per-eked toy ll4sjckpI4 kLkp jj/ ( use Suf asQ c Q �L � k . ✓" I QN k (hillesmt) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE May 30, 1996 EASEMENT No. 1 An easement is hereby granted for reciprocal rights of ingress and egress from SW Bull Mountain Road between those properties as described in deed recording No. 94-095985 and 95-074966, over the vehicular driving aisles and maneuvering areas as may be constructed on the properties. EASEMENT No. 2 An easement is hereby granted to the City of Tigard and their assigns for ingress, egress, emergency use, operation and maintenance of any public facilities constructed on those properties as described in deed recording No. 94-095985 and 95-074966, over, under and across all of the vehicular driving aisles and maneuvering areas as well as any landscaped areas adjacent to the public facilities as may be required operate those facilities. GRETCHEN VA . NAIS • LANDSCA _ E ARCHITECT 2041 SW 58TH AVENUE PORTLAND , OREGON 97221 • 503 292-8713 June 7, 1996 RFCEjvED CO Uhf u Of1r1 pp &Or Mark Roberts Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Hillview Terrace II 11336 S. W. Bull Mt. Road Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Roberts: Attached please find a report on the existing trees at the above-mentioned site. The report is written by Terrill Collier, Certified Arborist. According to this report there are four significant trees on the site. It will be necessary to remove these trees in order to construct this project. The trees to be removed total 72 inches in diameter. The trees proposed to be planted in the project total 87-3/4". A chart detailing this information is attached to this letter. The total inches of the trees proposed to be planted is greater than the total inches of the trees to be removed. This exceeds the City's mitigation requirements. Sincerely, U6 .(9,,,.>- etchen V adnais � %V z kak Y Trees to be removed: Size Total Dia. Inches 1 Honeylocust in poor condition 10" 10" 1 Oregon Ash, good condition 24" 24" 1 Oregon Oak,good condition 24" 24" 1 ' Willow in very poor condition 14" 14" Total Diameter Inches Removed 72" Proposed Trees: 1 Norway Maple 2-1/2" 2-1/2" 4 Red Maple 2" 8" 8 Red Alder(5 gal.) 314" 7-1/2" 8 Raywood Ash 2" 12" 10 Flowering Cherry 1-3/4" 17-1/2" 9 Douglas-fir(5-6') 1" 11" 5 Flowering Pear 1-3/4" 8-3/4" 2 Red Oak 2-1/2" 5" 6 Scarlet Oak 2-1/2" 15" Total Diameter Inches Proposed: 87-3/4" JUFd-t7-1996r 03:14 R.G. NAFF P.02 COLLIER Professional Tree,Shrub, & Lawn Care Since 1937 ARBOR CARE 9032 SF Dcvimtn,Pordarwl,ore oc 972GG-1449 June 6, 1996 Ron Naff 18641 SR'Benheld Ave. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 re: Tree health assessment at Hiillview Te e • 11336 SW Bull Mtn Rd, Tigard, Oregon Ear Mr.Nat, I examined six trecs at the Hillview Terre site Ivhich were located on the site map you provided me. Three trees were shown on the site maple near Bull Mtn. Rd near the northwest comer of the site. 1 found only one out of three trees standing. The other two apparently blew over as evidenced by uprooted stumps. The trunks had been cut and removed leaving the uprooted stumps. The stumps were approximately 18 and 10 inches in diameter. Because the stumps uprooted to the northeast, it is likely the trees blew over in the December 1995 windstorm. The remaining g tree is a ten ineh diameter honeylocust (Gleditsia). The tree is in poor shape,it has a broken main branch_ The other three trees are located in the southwest corner of the property_ They are as follows: 1. 24 inch diameter Oregon ash( apcintks latifolia)in relatively good condition. 1 24 inch diameter Garry oak ((crcus garryana) in fair to good condition. Some small branch dieback. Crown structure is asymmetric. No trunk problems observed. Porcl,.d(503)774-9642 - Vanc-ouvcr(360)693-6056 • FAX(503)774-7932 1/7;"r.d m,.#'j. 4 r.y-' JLh,a � —X37-1' 95 08:15 R.G. NAFF P.0 3. 14 inch diameter willow(Sa}ix,a). This tree is in very poor condition. Tree has two trunks,both trunks are hollow and decayed. Poor amount of growth. Plemse call me if you have further questions.. Thank you, Terrill Collier Certified Arborist Collier Arbor Care, Inc. Hit/view Terrace Report 6-6.96 pg. 2 of 2 TOTRL P.03 TOTAL P.03 FORM No.926—GE ERAL EASEMENT 5TE\c' ..NESS LAW PUBLISIIINS CO.,PORTLAND,OR 97704 NL ,S M, i U AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT TFt. GREEMENT,Made and entered into this 19th day L f June ,/996.., by and between Andrews Management Limited , an Oregon Corporation hereinafter called the first party,and Andrews Management Limited , its successors , or assigns ,hereinafter called the second party; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS: The first party is the record owner of the following described real estate in Washington County,State of Oregon, to-wit: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT 41 AND SKETCH and has the unrestricted right to grant the easement hereinafter described relative ro the real estate; NOW, THEREFORE, in view of the premises and in consideration of One Dollar ($1) by the second party to the first party paid and other valuable considerations, the receipt of all of which hereby is acknowledged by the first party, they agree as follows: The first party does hereby grant, assign and set over to the second party SEE EXHIBIT "A" (Insert here a full description of the nature and type of the easement granted to the second party.) —OVER— AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT STATE OF OREGON, Iss. County of BETWEEN I certify that the within instrument I Andrews Management Limited was received for record on the day 4000 Kruise Way Place of , 19 , Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 at o'clock M.,and recorded AND SPACE RESERVED in book/reel/volume No on Andrews Management Limited FOR page or as fee/file/instru- 4 0 0 0 Kruise Way Place RECORDER'S USE ment/microfilm/reception No Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Record of of said county. Aker resenting return to(Name,Addre's,Zip): Witness my hand and seal of Andrewg Ma.nageme.n_t_..L_imd tad County affixed. 4QQQ Kz.u. s_e Way--.E.t.a-c.e NAME TITLE 4.5We$.Q.,....0xe.g.Q.n 97435 By ,Deputy — ICAC, I The second party shall have all rights of ingress and egress to and from the real estate (including the right from time to time, except as hereinafter provided, to cut, trim and remove trees, brush, overhanging it branches and other obstructions) necessary for the second party's use, enjoyment,operation and maintenance of the easement hereby granted and all rights and privileges incident thereto. Except as to the rights herein granted, the first party shall have the full use and control of the above de- scribed real estate. The second party hereby agrees to hold and save the first party harmless from any and all claims of third parties arising from second party's use of the rights herein granted. The easement described above shall continue for a period of in d e f.i n i t e ,always subject, however, to the following specific conditions, restrictions and considerations: SEE EXHIBIT "A" 1,1'1 I If this easement is for a right of way over or across the real estate, the center line of the easement is described as follows: II N/A 1 c and second party's right of way shall be parallel with the center line and not more than ..-NIA feet distant from either side thereof. During the existence of this easement, maintenance of the easement and costs of repair of the easement damaged by natural disasters or other events for which all holders of an interest in the easement are blameless shall be the responsibility of (check one):10 the first party; ❑ the second party; ❑ both parties, share and share alike; ❑ both parties, with the first party being responsible for ;o and the second party being II responsible for %. (If the last alternative is selected, the percentages allocated to each party should total 100.) During the existence of this easement, those holders of an interest in the easement that are responsible for damage to the easement because of negligence or abnormal use shall repair the damage at their sole expense. This agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of, as the circumstances may require, not only the immediate parties hereto but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators and successors in interest. In construing this agreement, where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all gram- matical changes shall be made so that this agreement shall apply equally to individuals and to corporations. If the undersigned is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed and its seal (if any) affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by its board of directors. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands in duplicate on this, the day and year first hereinabove written. First Party Second Party STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON, ) ss. /1/� {`r�_ )ss. County of C4a 0t-'4 ) County of LY.i�il�i. ) This instrument was acknowledged bleforlp me on This instrument was a�jknowledged beforreel,+,eon -4t,rV._.�C'� ,19. 14!,by P�,)1 1.�. - ...t4r!/l F ,�L�,4Ll,�Cl :9 S�a.,by......f... ,1��,�Y ��,y. }.irs ir� as Y.I.( ..Pre5.i fY.... of ' t i. eMl�...I.:iQ nllllll'll of AnW..Y... a GY11Ei r §� OFFICIAL SEAL .; l� wL` '' OFFICIAL L Ct -- , �_ AMY E.RUSSELL _ 0.MX8-RUSSELL. \y-r;) NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON c ota •ublic i�y C►re NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGO 4 '+= •ublic io Oregon COtAAA ria.0517a2 . 'rn�.�. to CoMmiSStON i S' 4-WKW- Nl�<C.'-r?{x MY COMMIS tic n . T (hillesmt) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE May 30, 1996 EASEMENT No. 1 An easement is hereby granted for reciprocal rights of ingress and egress from SW Bull Mountain Road between those properties as described in deed recording No. 94-095985 and 95-074966, Parcel 1, over the vehicular driving aisles and maneuvering areas as may be constructed on the properties. EASEMENT No. 2 An easement is hereby granted to the City of Tigard and their assigns for ingress, egress, emergency use, operation and maintenance of any public facilities constructed on those properties as described in deed recording No. 94-095985 and 95-074966, Parcel 1, over, under and across all of the vehicular driving aisles and maneuvering areas as well as any landscaped areas adjacent to the public facilities as may be required operate those facilities. — • _ f TAIN ROA� — __— G S'c o — ^���CS _____ -F- DEED CORDING #95-0RE74966 PARCEL 2 5 ,.s o EOR g8 0P° 0,-- O9`� Cl m "HILLVIEW TERRACE APTS." DEED RECORDING o #95-074966 W PARCEL 1 a J EXHIBIT "A" N J INGRESS, EGRESS, OPERATION �` & MAINTENANCE EASEMENT L.W E � LEGAL DESCRIPTION SKETCH MAY 30th, 1996 JAY HARRIS S (4, H111uIHH1uuuuuu1111IIuuuuuI1I1u11I1uuI1111IuIuuI11 7(McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 1 00 200 r� ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS SCALE 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223-6287 ' PHONE: (503) 639-3453 FAX: (503) 639-1232 FORM No.926—GENERAL EASEMENT. COPYRIGHT I .TEVENS-NESS LAW PUBLISHING CO.,PORTLAND,OR• 204 • NL AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this 19th day of June ,199 6___, by and between Andrews Management Limited , an Oregon Corporation , hereinafter called the first party,and Andrews Management Limited , its successors , or assigns ,hereinafter called the second party; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS: The first party is the record owner of the following described real estate in Washington County,State of Oregon,to-wit: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT #1 AND SKETCH ■ and has the unrestricted right to grant the easement hereinafter described relative to the real estate; NOW, THEREFORE, in view of the premises and in consideration of One Dollar ($1) by the second party to the first party paid and other valuable considerations, the receipt of all of which hereby is acknowledged by the first party, they agree as follows: The first party does hereby grant, assign and set over to the second party SEE EXHIBIT "A" i Ii (Insert here a full description of the nature and type of the easement granted to the second party.) —OVER— li AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT S CoTuE O f OREGON, 1 ss. BETWEEN I certify that the within instrument II Andrews Management Limited was received for record on the day 4000 Kruise Way Place of , 19 , Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 at o'clock M.,and recorded AND SPACE RESERVED in book/reel/volume No on Andrews Management Limited FOR page or as fee/file/instru- 4000 Kruise Way Place RECORDER S USE ment/microfilm/reception No • Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Record of of said county. After recording Mum to(Nome,Address,Zip): Witness my hand and seal of I Andrews Manageme_n-t_-_limited County affixed. 4Q00 Kruise Way Place IILake 4*we$_g_,---Qr -Q_g_QD 97Q By NAME TITLE,Deputy . The second party sha.. _,ave all rights of ingress and egress to a_ from the real estate (including the right from time to time, except as hereinafter provided, to cut, trim and remove trees, brush, overhanging branches and other obstructions) necessary for the second party's use,enjoyment,operation and maintenance of the easement hereby granted and all rights and privileges incident thereto. Except as to the rights herein granted, the first party shall have the full use and control of the above de- scribed real estate. i! The second party hereby agrees to hold and save the first party harmless from any and all claims of third parties arising from second party's use of the rights herein granted. i The easement described above shall continue for a period of indefinite ,always subject, however, to the following specific conditions, restrictions and considerations: SEE EXHIBIT "A" 1 i If this easement is for a right of way over or across the real estate, the center line of the easement is I described as follows: 1 N/A I f and second party's right of way shall be parallel with the center line and not more than ___NIA feet it distant from either side thereof. During the existence of this easement, maintenance of the easement and costs of repair of the easement damaged by natural disasters or other events for which all holders of an interest in the easement are blameless shall be the responsibility of (check one):XI the first party; ❑ the second party; ❑ both parties, share and share alike; ❑ both parties, with the first party being responsible for % and the second party being responsible for 70. (If the last alternative is selected, the percentages allocated to each party should total 100.) During the existence of this easement, those holders of an interest in the easement that are responsible for damage to the easement because of negligence or abnormal use shall repair the damage at their sole expense. This agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of, as the circumstances may require, not only the immediate parties hereto but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators and successors in interest. In construing this agreement, where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all gram- matical changes shall be made so that this agreement shall apply equally to individuals and to corporations. If the undersigned is a corporation, it has caused its name to be signed and its seal (if any) affixed by an officer or other person duly authorized to do so by its board of directors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands in duplicate on this, the day and year first hereinabove written. First Party Second Party STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON, ) County of CU(4 1-^A ) County of CeK SL/1. lIAA ) This instrument was acknowledged hater Mme on 1'. ,v. Thies innstrument was acpknowledged before eon (41A-.. ,19- ,by Phlt `� 11°"_ M Ll✓,191(i by + - `. Vlf2.r_Y-T.rSl f -- as_----__. !. Re5i of • b i , I.4 BMf� of '' ° OFFICIAL SEAL i; �� = AMY E RUSSELL �� '' l ;�, OFFICIAL SEAL �� I•AMY.E RUSSELL i` NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ■ota�ublic tg Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGO 4/16 •ublic f Oregon Ilr:c COMtiA a.�.NQ 0517e 2 /) r:"• COM ,$ 1�7�r MY COMMIS a 4' ' f 7 MY COMMIS D(PIRESMAH.4, • (hillesmt) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE May 30, 1996 EASEMENT No. 1 An easement is hereby granted for reciprocal rights of ingress and egress from SW Bull Mountain Road between those properties as described in deed recording No. 94-095985 and 95-074966, Parcel 1, over the vehicular driving aisles and maneuvering areas as may be constructed on the properties. EASEMENT No. 2 An easement is hereby granted to the City of Tigard and their assigns for ingress, egress, emergency use, operation and maintenance of any public facilities constructed on those properties as described in deed recording No. 94-095985 and 95-074966, Parcel 1, over, under and across all of the vehicular driving aisles and maneuvering areas as well as any landscaped areas adjacent to the public facilities as may be required operate those facilities. v,1\ ROAD - - s% BULL ------ P DEED RECORDING #95- 074966 PARCEL 2 \Oc -' G E Po'���,o t) DEC- F9�ga5 w "HILLVIEW TERRACE APTS." DEED RECORDING o #95-074966 W PARCEL 1 a v EXHIBIT "A" N I INGRESS, EGRESS, OPERATION W I _ E & MAINTENANCE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION SKETCH MAY 30th, 1996 JAY HARRIS S (�./ 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111 111 0 HA S—McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES, INC. �� �U,) r� ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS SCALE TIGARD, OR 97 23 88287 PHONE: (503) 839-3453 FAX: (503) 839-1232