Loading...
SDR1996-00019 SDR96 - 00019 FARMERS INSURANCE NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 CRY OF TIGARD FARMERS INSURANCE SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: FARMERS INSURANCE Site Development Review SDR 96-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 191,650 square foot office complex. APPLICANT: Gerding/Edlen Development OWNER: FIG Holding Company 2525 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 201 4600 Wilshire Boulevard Portland, OR 97201 Los Angeles, CA 90010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Office). ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Commercial). LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; WCTM 2S1 01DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, and 2200. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106 18.108 18.114. 18.116 18 120. 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: .......... .. . (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sidewalk work, sanitary and storm sewer taps, water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) sets of the proposed public improvement plans for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a permit from the Engineering Department has been issued. Financial assurance equal to 100 percent of the cost of the public improvements, a Developer-Engineer Agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee (if applicable) are required. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall dedicate a public pedestrian/bicycle path easement for placement of a 6-foot-wide sidewalk on the north/east side of SW 68th Avenue. The sidewalk shall be constructed in a meandered alignment similar to the existing sidewalk on the south/west side of the roadway. The applicant shall construct the sidewalk as part of Phase I (Buildings A and B) and the easement width should be wide enough to accommodate the entire sidewalk. 5. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waivCa the proper y uwl per's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future I imnrn■ Q1/1/PF+h vAn, 6. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on standard City forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on, and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 8. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall record the appropriate private utility easements to allow the proposed private sanitary, water, and storm sewer lines to cross over property lines. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 2 9. The street opening permit shall include the private storm pipe crossing of SW 68th Avenue. Any portion of the private storm pipe within the public Right-of-way (ROW) shall be constructed to public standards. 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations, for review and approval. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the site improvement drawings to be reviewed by the Building Division. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 12. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. 13. Plans approved by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 14. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. Impervious surface/landscaping calculations shall be submitted which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will be provided. The applicant shall provide total site calculations, as well as calculations provided with each phase of the development. B. Nine (9) disabled parking spaces for phase one, and eight (8) disabled parking spaces for phase two. C. Seventeen (17) bicycle parking spaces for phase one, and nineteen (19) bicycle parking spaces for phase two. D. Location of a loading space for each building. The location and design of such spaces shall be approved by the City Engineer E. Walkway connection with the existing concrete walk shown to connect with the Farmers Insurance building. F. Written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. G. Mitigation plan that provides for mitigation of 1,794 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to provide a mitigation plan based upon the removal of trees associated with each phase. Tree removal shall not be allowed prior to the applicant providing resolution to the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) right-of-way property. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 3 15. A letter from the consulting arborist that verifies that tree protection measures have been installed according to the tree protection specifications submitted with the application. 16. Prior to the release of any permits for phase two (south side of 68th Avenue), the applicant shall provide documentation of resolution of the ODOT right-of-way issue. The applicant shall provide proof of ownership of that portion of land which is currently ODOT right-of-way. If the applicant does not obtain ownership of the subject property, the plans shall be revised and a new site development review application shall be submitted for development of phase two. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 17. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements. 18. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A Lot Line Adjustment (MIS 96-0011) was approved on tax lots 200, 300, 400, 500, 700, and 2200. No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located north of Highway 217, south of SW Hampton Street, west of SW 66th Avenue, and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue. Properties to the north, south and west are zoned C-P (Professional Commercial). Property to the north and south are developed with commercial (office) uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site consists of approximately 12.49 acres, is presently vacant, and contains a number of mature trees. There is approximately 6.88 acres south of SW 68th Parkway and approximately 5.61 acres north of SW 68th Parkway. There is a forested ravine, with moderate to steep slopes, along the southwest portion of the property. There are approximately 8,937 square feet (.2 acres) of wetlands within the narrow channelized bottom of the drainage swale. The proposal will not encroach into the ravine or wetland area. The NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 4 applicant is proposing to construct a four (4) building, 191,650 square foot office complex. Access to the site will be provided from SW 68th Parkway and SW 66th Avenue. The proposal will be developed in two phases. Phase one will be the development of the northern portion of the site and phase two will be the development of the southern portion of the site. All site improvements required to support phase one will be in place prior to construction of phase two. The revised site plan (dated 10/14/96) shows lot lines which zig-zag through the parking areas. This plan gives the appearance that there are four (4) parcels underlying this development. This plan is not accurate. The lot lines as shown on this plan have not been approved by the City of Tigard, nor have they been recorded by the County. The tax lots which do exist are those involved in the 1996 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS 96-0011) and are identified as WCTM 2S1 01 DA, tax lots 100, 200, 300, 400, and 2200. A separate application will have to be made if the applicant wishes to adjust the property lines to reflect those shown on the subject plan. This will be required in order to gain building permits from the Building Division. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build office buildings. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Professional and Administrative Services. Code Section 18.64.030 lists Professional and Administrative Services as a permitted use in the C-P zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.64.050 states that the minimum lot area is 6,000 square feet and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet for parcels in the C-P zoning district The site is approximately 12.49 acres and has a width of approximately 490 feet, thereby, exceeding the required minimum lot size and width requirement. Developments within the C-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has not provided calculations regarding the amount of impervious surface and landscaping. Impervious surface/landscaping calculations shall be submitted which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will be provided. The applicant shall provide total site calculations, as well as, calculations provided with each phase of the development. Setbacks: Section 18.64.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except 20 feet shall be required where the C-P zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet Setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing building heights of 32 feet, well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 5 with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There is a forested ravine, with moderate to steep slopes along the southwest portion of the property. There are approximately 8,937 square feet (.2 acres) of wetlands within the narrow channelized bottom of the drainage swale. The proposal will not encroach into the ravine or wetland area. There are approximately 400 trees on the property. Given the location of the buildings, parking area, and accessways, as well as the grading required to accommodate this proposal, approximately 168 of the existing trees will be removed. An arborist report has been submitted that addresses preservation of trees on the property. In accordance with Section 18.150, trees greater than 12-inch caliper will be mitigated. The proposed plan also includes new parking lot and street trees. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria is not applicable as this proposal does not abut a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130). Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site plan, parking and storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's lighting plan and has no comments or objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 6 Phased Development: Section 18.120.050 allows approval of a time schedule for developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than three years without reapplying for site development review. The criteria for approving a phased site development review proposal is that the following are satisfied: 1. The public facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. All public facilities required to serve each phase shall be constructed in conjunction with, or prior to, each phase. Each phase will contain all the site improvements necessary to function as a distinct development. 2. The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of temporary public facilities (a temporary facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard). The applicant is not proposing the use of any temporary public facilities. 3. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required by an approved development proposal. The applicant shall construct all necessary improvements to serve this development. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). As indicated on the site plan, street trees have been provided in accordance with this section. Street trees will consist of a mix of preserved trees and newly proposed trees. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. While the site plans do not reflect landscape planters within the parking lot areas, the landscape plan shows the provision of parking lot trees. The plan shows that the distribution of parking lot trees will provide for the required canopy effect, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 7 1 obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, vision clearance will be provided in accordance with this section. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(C)(1) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor space for Administrative and Professional Services. The 91,560 square feet of office buildings on phase one requires 262 parking spaces. The proposed plan indicates that 436 spaces have been provided with phase one. The 100,000 square feet of office buildings on phase two requires 286 parking spaces. The proposed plan indicates that 378 spaces have been provided with phase two. The proposed plan, therefore, satisfies this requirement. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 9 disabled parking spaces if 401 to 500 parking spaces are provided and requires 8 disabled parking spaces if 301 to 400 parking spaces are provided. Phase one, therefore, requires nine (9) disabled parking spaces and phase two requires eight (8) disabled spaces. The plan shows the provision of eight (8) disabled parking spaces for phase one. The plan does not show the provision of disabled parking spaces for phase two. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides for nine (9) disabled parking spaces for phase one, and eight (8) disabled parking spaces for phase two, in accordance with this section. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Seventeen (17) bicycle parking spaces will be required for phase one of this development. Nineteen (19) bicycle parking spaces will be required for phase two of this development. The plan shows that ten bicycle parking spaces are provided with phase one. The plan does not indicate the provision of bicycle parking spaces for phase two. A revised plan shall be submitted which shows the provision and location of seventeen (17) bicycle parking spaces for phase one and nineteen (19) bicycle parking spaces for phase two. Off-Street Loading spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The applicant's narrative states that a loading dock has been provided for the 55,650 square foot building and that service entries will be provided at each of the three remaining buildings. The site plan shows the provision of a 15- foot-wide loading area for building 'A' although the elevation plan does not clearly show the provision of a loading area. The applicant shall revise the plans to identify the location of a loading space for each building, in accordance with this section. The location and design of such spaces shall be approved by the City Engineer. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 8 Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require more than 100 parking spaces provide two (2) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet or one (1) access with a minimum width of 50 feet and a minimum pavement width of 40 feet. The preliminary plan shows the provision of four (4) access drives on SW 68th Avenue. Each phase will be served by two (2) access drives. The accesses onto SW 68th Avenue are a minimum of twenty-four (24) feet-wide, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The plan partially complies with this section. The plan shows the provision of walkways which extend from the building entrances to SW 68th Avenue. in accordance with this section. The plan does not provide a connection with the existing concrete walk shown to connect with the Farmers Insurance building. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides a walkway connection with this existing walkway. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans show the provision of trash enclosures. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding these locations. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant has provided a report and plan that identifies all existing trees greater than six (6) inches in caliper. The inventory identified 400 trees greater than 12-inch caliper. The proposed plan will be removing 168 trees greater than 12-inch caliper, for a total of 3,589 caliper inches. Since the applicant is NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 9 retaining from 50 to 75 percent of the 400 existing trees, Section 18.100.025(B)(2)(c) requires a mitigation program, according to Section 18.150.070.D, of 50 percent of the trees removed. The applicant shall, therefore, provide a mitigation plan that provides for mitigation of 1,794 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to provide a mitigation plan based upon the removal associated with each phase. Tree removal shall not be allowed prior to the applicant providing resolution to the ODOT right-of-way property. The arborist report provides a summary of the required mitigation. The report identifies 1,794 caliper inches which requires mitigation. The report estimates that if a mitigation tree of 3-inch caliper size were provided, then 598 trees would be the total number of mitigation trees required to satisfy this section. The report subtracts 200 trees as this is the number of trees proposed on the landscape plan, and concludes that a total of 398 trees would remain to be planted to comply with the mitigation plan. Section 18.150.070(E) states that a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. The arborist report includes an estimate from a landscape company of the cost to install 398, 3-inch caliper trees. It appears that the applicant may elect to compensate the City for replacement. The method of estimating the cost is acceptable to the City. The report subtracted 200 trees because this was approximately the number of trees shown on the landscape plan. The City requires the planting of trees (ie..street, parking lot, buffering) as a standard condition for development. Such trees are required irregardless of the existing vegetation on the property. To be counted as "mitigation" for the removal of a valued amenity on a property, mitigation is; that which is above and beyond that which is a standard requirement. Therefore, the 200 trees identified in the arborist report cannot be counted as outright mitigation. The typical caliper size for a street tree and parking lot tree is a 2-inch caliper. If the landscape plan shows the provision of 3-inch caliper trees, the 1-inch caliper that is above and beyond the typical 2-inch caliper tree can be counted toward total caliper mitigation. The allowable mitigation would then be 200 caliper inches or 66, 3-inch caliper trees. The total number of trees to be mitigated would, therefore, be 532 (598 minus 66) trees. At an estimated cost of$166.00 each, the total cost for compensating the City to replace those trees would be $88,312.00. To provide for compliance with this section, a revised mitigation plan shall be submitted. The plan shall provide for mitigation of 1,794 caliper inches. This plan may provide for on- site, off-site, or compensation mitigation. The applicant may: subtract the "above and beyond" caliper inches for trees which are required landscaping, revise the estimated compensation, or revise the plan to provide greater preservation of trees. Signs: Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Services Technicians. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 10 1 1 PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS: A transportation impact analysis was submitted by Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. (MEI), dated August 1, 1996. This report analyzed the potential impact of the proposed driveway locations on 68th Parkway, as well as the potential impact on several intersections in the vicinity from additional trip generation from the development. It was found that all proposed driveways will operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) under the estimated traffic for the year 2001. The major intersections analyzed in the study were: 1. Hampton Street/SW 72nd Avenue 2. Hampton Street/SW 68th Parkway 3. Southwest 68th Parkway/SW 66th Avenue. Based on the findings of the MEI report, the development of this project will not have a negative impact on any of the three intersections above. All intersections will operate a LOS "C" or better, which is acceptable. Traffic signal and left-turn lane warrants were also considered by MEI for the Hampton Street/SW 68th Parkway intersection. The report indicates that for year 2001 traffic volumes, including projected traffic from this project, warrants for a left turn lane and signal are not met. ODOT commented that they desired MEI to also analyze the intersection of Dartmouth Street/SW 68th Parkway. ODOT was concerned about the effect of the additional traffic from this site on the existing 1-5 interchange at that location. MEI submitted a supplement to their traffic study, dated September 25, 1996. The supplemental report indicates that currently this intersection operates at LOS A in the AM peak hours and LOS B during the PM peak. With development of this site, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service, specifically LOS A during the AM peak, and LOS C or D during the PM peak. ODOT sent a follow-up response, dated October 11, 1996 indicating that they concurred with MEI's findings and had no further In summary, based on the findings of the transportation analysis and the supplemental report submitted by MEI, no off-site street or intersection improvements are warranted or proposed. STREETS: SW 68th Parkway: SW 68th Parkway is classified as a major collector street and is fully improved adjacent to this site, with the exception of a sidewalk on the north/east side of the street. The existing 5-foot wide walkway on the south/west side of the street meanders inside a 15-foot wide NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 11 public pedestrian/bicycle easement. In pre-application discussions with the applicant, the City indicated that a walkway with similar alignment should be provided on the north/east side. The current width standard for a sidewalk on a major collector street is 6 feet. The applicant expressed a concern with this because the current right-of-way (ROW) is not quite wide enough to allow for this width of sidewalk and suggested the City accept a public easement for the sidewalk in similar fashion to what exists on the south side. Staff concurs with this suggestion and has proposed a condition to reflect this concept. SW 66th Avenue: SW 66th Avenue is classified as a local commercial & industrial street. It once was a frontage roadway controlled by ODOT, but in 1981 ODO I reiinquished its interest in the ROW to the City of Tigard. Since that date, the roadway has been primarily used by local traffic and does not experience heavy traffic loads. During pre-application discussions with the applicant, the applicant expressed a desire to obtain a portion of the 66th Avenue ROW, specifically at the very south end adjacent to the intersection with 68th Parkway. City staff have discussed this proposal and concur with the applicant that the ROW could be vacated. The City's Transportation Plan does not indicate that this street will be upgraded in the future, nor does it require the street to be extended to the south (there are no other properties for the street to serve). In order to vacate the portion of the ROW proposed by the applicant, the City must deem the ROW as surplus, according to the 1981 agreement with ODOT. Once this is completed, ODOT would then allow the applicant to purchase the ROW. City staff will approach the City Council on November 11, 1996 with a recommendation to declare the portion of ROW as surplus. The vacation of the ROW is necessary in order for the applicant to build Phase II of the project (Buildings C and D) as proposed. All indications from ODOT are that they will sell the ROW to the applicant. Staff recommends that prior to issuance of any site or building permits for Phase II (Buildings C or D) that this issue be resolved. If, for some reason, the applicant is unsuccessful in obtaining the property, they will need to revise their plans for Phase II and resubmit for a new Site Development Review. The status of SW 66th Avenue is a two-lane paved street with no curbs on either side. ODOT has future plans to expand the interchange of 1-5 at Highway 217. These improvements may result in a need to relocate portions of SW 66th Avenue to the west. However, preliminary plans for the ODOT improvements suggest that no part of the subject site will be affected by the future project. Staff discussed potential street improvements for 66th Avenue with the applicant during pre-application meetings. Staff indicated that any improvements required would be consistent with the local commercial and industrial street standard, unless otherwise suggested by the applicant's transportation study. No special improvement of 66th Avenue is recommended by the transportation study submitted by the applicant, therefore the local commercial and industrial standard will be used. Since there is the potential for realignment of 66th Avenue in the future when ODOT improves the interchange, the City recommends that no street improvements be built by the applicant until such time the ODOT improvement impacts become more defined. The applicant could enter into an agreement whereby they waive their right to remonstrate against the formation of a future local improvement district to improve the street. Staff recommends the applicant enter into such an agreement. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 12 WATER: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There is an existing 8-inch public water line in SW 68th Avenue that the applicant proposes to serve • the new buildings from. Any connections to the water line in 68th Avenue shall be approved and permitted through TVWD. SANITARY SEWER: i 1 There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line in SW 68th Avenue, and in the ROW of SW 66th Avenue, that can serve this site. The applicant's plan submittal for the site development review did not indicate how sewer service would be extended to the four new buildings. However, Staff has been able to review proposed construction plans for Buildings A and B and notes that new sanitary sewer laterals will need to be extended from the main line to the buildings. Likewise, the other two buildings will need sewer laterals extended. This work will require a permit from the Engineering Department. The plan indicates that there will be private utility lines crossing over property lines in order to serve all four buildings. This is acceptable provided the applicant records the appropriate private utility easements. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the 1 applicant shall record any necessary private utility easements. 1 STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site naturally flows to the south and east toward 1-5. There are two locations where storm pipes enter the ODOT ROW of 1-5. The first location is just south of where 68th Parkway intersects with 66th Avenue. Storm water from 68th Avenue is collected in a public storm pipe that discharges into an existing 18-inch storm pipe that crosses 1-5. The other location is further south where an existing drainage area (between this site and the Farmer's Insurance building site) is collected and discharges into a 24- inch storm pipe that enters the ODOT ROW; from there, the water enters a much larger 84-inch diameter pipe. The applicant has coordinated with the ODOT hydraulics engineer with respect to the potential impact generated from this development. The applicant proposes to convey the on-site storm water to the southern end of the development area and detain it in an on-site water quality/detention pond before discharging the water into the existing 24-inch storm pipe. ODOT has indicated that they do not have a concern with this concept but the applicant should limit their peak discharge volume to the undeveloped 50-year storm event. The preliminary calculations indicate that the proposed pond site will have more than enough capacity to handle the storage of the 50-year storm event. The proposed pond is shown on property not owned by the applicant. There is a memo in the applicant's materials which indicate the owner plans to purchase additional property for the pond. If the applicant can not obtain the additional property, they will at least need to obtain a private storm drainage easement from the adjacent owner or relocate the pond on the subject property. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 13 1 The applicant's plan proposes to convey storm water from the northerly portion of the site across SW 68th Avenue to reach the southern portion of the site and the pond. The plan shows a new private storm pipe that would need to cross the public street. Staff reviewed this option and, although it is not generally recommended to allow private storm drainage pipes within a public ROW, it appears to be warranted in this case. Without the crossing, the applicant would need to place a second pond on the north side of the street, treat and detain the storm water, then release it into the existing storm pipe in 68th Avenue. However, they would need to open cut most of 68th Avenue to reach the existing storm pipe which lies on the southern edge of the street. Therefore, either option will result in a private pipe within the ROW. The applicant's plan for one pond to serve the entire site is desirable from a cost and maintenance standpoint. A property owner will experience less cost and effort in maintaining one facility rather than multiple facilities. Staff therefore recommends that the applicant's storm pipe plan concept be approved. Staff further recommends that the applicant be required to construct the portion of private storm pipe within the ROW to our public standards (materials, installation, etc.). The applicant's engineer has indicated that they will comply with City standards. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated previously, there will be a pond located near the southern end of the development area. This pond will act as a water quality and storm water detention facility. Preliminary calculations indicate the pond will adequately treat the anticipated storm water runoff. GRADiNG AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 14 I EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: • There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division states that the applicant shall provide for the removal of all underlying property divisions, provide fire flow test of all fire hydrants in the immediate area, and provide a geotechnical soils report for each building site. The City of Tigard Police Department and Maintenance Services Department have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. r SECTION VI AGENCY COMMENTS 1 Unified Sewerage Agency states that a 25-foot protective corridor should be preserved k adjacent to the sensitive area, and that a water quality facility is required. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue states that revised plans shall be submitted that reflect all noted and corrected items for review and approval. A previous Fire and Life Safety Review had identified items that the plan needed to address. 11 Oregon Department of Transportation initially stated they are concerned about how the intersection of 68th Parkway and Dartmouth Street/Interstate-5 interchange would operate with the reported traffic volumes. ODOT requested that a capacity analysis be performed on this intersection to determine whether there is adequate capacity available to handle the traffic volumes. ODOT received and reviewed an additional traffic analysis and concurs that the infersection should continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. Tualatin Valley Water District states that the applicant shall provide easements for existing water lines. GTE states that the developer/owner to place conduit/manholes as per GTE's specifications. 1 PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. j I i 9 INOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 15 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON OCTOBER 28, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. fTHE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 28, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. October 17. 1996 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Associate Planner 1 October 17. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager 1 1CURPLMvn11\S 0 R96-16.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 16 7. c:\:\‘ : b :,...._, MC MI Slit DATA I rn 10 �r� f01.0 LIt.M.• I/II K. NOU I.V MIN• In AC W.th 01 NI. III C �`�� .. rorK GROSS 11.0‘v III/00 rnewc.(P•0•fa I pf+R[D + 1 0 I • ''''',1, 11jA 7.• I/t CGW.CI • • r �,o MIMI ,.......,./`.......\-..„ i/ .,./.'". / i 1_ . ea (41,67 /f/r) I D . i 7 up r� 1 fir` Og �`' r = 1 C, t am`'—r J--arm—� �e r' ■ a 1 o ��/ 11_ - r .. L_____ Rco. 1 ati (n r--\__________ I _____, u i § II Lr �. O 1° INTERSTATE 5 R Ab CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. ...,-.-• 1 a ' _ _ ,7.` ...■II II liel MN $ 1)\\\.,.. , ei r 1 IV „if , 1.1 IN „, , , ... , . 1 c ; ! , . kih, mil L . 11111111 151 III SUBJECT 1 '4 asi c1,1 $!!! ' PA LS . » .iia,,,i,b, 8 : .,,,, ,111 0, , ilill _ . -, •... . i Rig iis mown ARLP 1111 .521-A , *0*,,,:--,..7*- ---i I _ . Iv c i c i Iilrg 0... lit 1 m ,„.., .. .. p .11:: . ■', MI IL Vicinity 7.-:a n SDR 96-0019 N! 1 Farmer's Insurance 1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING OCT 161996 GERDING/EDLEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 12, 1996 Len Schelsky Westlake Consultants Inc. 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway, Ste. 204 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Farmers Insurance property/lot line adjustments Dear Len: Pursuant to our telephone conference with Will D'Andrea at the City of Tigard please proceed with completion of appropriate applications with the city to adjust the lot lines for our proposed development as indicated on our most recent site plans. It is my understanding that you intend to have these complete and ready for execution by Farmers Insurance Group by Wednesday of next week and that following submission of such final approval by the city is expected within approximately three weeks. It is my further understanding from our conversation that these applications and the pending final approval of such will not delay or otherwise affect the review and approval of our submissions for design review, site development permits and building shell permits. Given the timing for our scheduled closing of the land acquisition, it is imperative that we submit the requested lot line adjustment applications and obtain final approval from the city as soon as possible. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter, please call me. Otherwise, I will follow up with you on Tuesday of next week. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely yours, Kell T. Saito Project Manager cc: Will D'Andrea, City of Tigard' Tamio Fukuyama, Group Mackenzie Terry Hauck, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt Mark Edlen, Gerding/Edlen Development Company KTS:figiot1.wpd Oregon October 11, 1996 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard Planning Department Region 1 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FILE CODE: Att: Will D'Andrea Re: SDR 96-0019 - Farmers Insurance PLA9-2A-TIG Our traffic analyst reviewed the additional traffic evaluation provided by MEI. ODOT concurs with the assumption that impacts to the intersection of Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Parkway would not be significant. The intersection should continue to operate at acceptable level of service. We appreciate the effort shown by the applicant in providing this study. Sony azen, P anner Development Review cc: Simon Eng, Traffic Analysis, ODOT Region 1 Martin Jensvold, Traffic Analysis, ODOT Region 1 Bob Schmidt, ODOT District 2A 4 9 R Z 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 Form 734-1850(11/94) FAX (503) 731-8259 J 10/11/96 12:02 $5037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 0001/001 -Yes Date Time Pmt-it' Fax Note 7672 :: ..; y ; No.of Pa /,��//9 (, // 7° IA c---9 ./& --- : CoMPam/ l! Location Dept Lo �e Fax ? ore a Fax it 77 72.5-- fe[ephang*/ 7 3/ orig.! E Destroy Return Cail!cr o'ncw Comments Dispc sition: Oregon October 11, 1996 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard Planning Department Region 1 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FILE CODE: Att: Will D'Andrea Re: SDR 96-0019 - Farmers Insurance PLA9-2A-Tic Our traffic analyst reviewed the additional traffic evaluation provided by MEI. ODOT concurs with the assumption that impacts to the intersection of Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Parkway would not be significant. The intersection should continue to operate at acceptable level of service. We appreciate the effort shown by the applicant in providing this study. V' any: azen, anner Development Review cc: Simon Eng, Traffic Analysis, ODOT Region 1 Martin Jensvold, Traffic Analysis, ODOT Region 1 Bob Schmidt, ODOT District 2A RECEtvED PUNNING On On DATE: September 4 , 1996 SEP06199s TO: Evelyn Rayfield • Development Review Planner INTEROFFICE MEMO FROM: Simon Eng Transportation Analyst SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Analysis Farmers Insurance Property Near I-5/Highway 217 Interchange We have reviewed the traffic impact analysis for a development consisting of four office buildings located adjacent to and immediately north of the existing Farmers Insurance building in the northwest quadrant of I-5/Highway 217 Interchange. We would like to offer the following comments regarding the proposed development. The traffic report assumes ODOT's planned improvements to the I-5/Highway 217 Kruse Way Interchange include widening the SW 72nd Ave. overpass from two to five lanes and realigning Hunziker Road to cross Highway 217 and intersect SW 72nd Ave. at Hampton St. This assumption is incorrect because the current design option for the I-5/Highway 217 project includes no operational improvements to the SW 72nd Ave. Interchange. This is for clarification only and does not affect the outcome or findings of the traffic study since the existing lane configuration on SW 72nd Ave. and Hampton St. was used in the analysis by the applicant. Unlike the Homestead Village Hotel development, it does not appear that the proposed development is within the area from which some right-of-way may need to be purchased for the I-5/Highway 217/Kruse Way project. According to the trip distribution shown in the report, approximately 55% of site traffic will travel north along SW 68th Parkway towards the I-5 interchange at Haines St. Along with the 2001 base traffic, there would be considerable traffic traveling on 68th Parkway. We are concerned about how the intersection of 68th Parkway and Dartmouth St./I-5 interchange would operate with these traffic volumes. We would like to request a capacity analysis performed on this intersection to determine whether there is adequate capacity available to handle the traffic volumes. This intersection is currently operating with a four-way stop. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 721-8223. SE:se A , ;,^.,., 731-0281( Martin Jensvold A:TIA/IS @2I7B.• i; RECEIVED PLANNING 6.F., 0 1996 September 4, 1996 6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard Region 1 Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FILE CODE: Attention: William D'Andrea Subject: Farmer's Insurance; (SDR) 96-0019 In regards to the proposed development, I have attached the comments of our traffic analyst, Simon Eng. It appears future expansion of the I-5/Highway 217 will not be an issue on this development. Our prime concern lies with the SW 68th Parkway and Darthmouth St/I-5 interchange. Please review the comments of our traffic analyst for specific information. If you have any questions regarding those comments, please call Simon at 721-8223. If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 731-8554 Evelyn Rayfield ✓ ODOT Planner, Development Review cc: Marty Jensvold Simon Eng Bob Schmidt of 0,, C 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)Form 734-1850(11/94) ( FAX(503)731-8259 09/04/96 16:29 $5037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 I J001/002 Post. Fax Note 7672 _- _G�_... __cvs�„ ,,.,..,.... Na.of P TodayS Pair �/b Time Ta i From Coralbn r Location Dept Charge Fan>r Tel= >r - Fax# • Telephone ft- - G canrtwms ___... 3L-.ps,sY ° D Destroy 0m Cal for pip - - • L --4 I/ ,r ' a_ -1- i_- Gam- 4es &A ,1 1 Oregoii September 4, 1996 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard Region 1 Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FILE CODE: Attention: William D'Andrea Subject: Farmer's Insurance; (SDR) 96-0019 In regards to the proposed development, I have attached the comments of our traffic analyst, Simon Eng. It appears future expansion of the I-5/Highway 217 will not be an issue on this development. Our prime concern lies with the SW 68th Parkway and Darthmouth St/I-5 interchange. Please review the comments of our traffic analyst for specific information. If you have any questions regarding those comments, please call Simon at 721-8223. If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 731-8554 i■uJz-i--- iztx.:40( Evelyn Rayfield ODOT Planner, Development Review cc: Marty Jensvold Simon Eng Bob Schmidt 09/04/96 16:30 $5037318259 ODOT — REGION 1 002. 002 DATE: September 4 , 1996 IIregon TO: Evelyn Rayfield Development Review Planner INTEROFFICE MEMO FROM: Simon Eng Transportation Analyst SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Analysis Farmers Insurance Property Near I-5/Highway 217 Interchange We have reviewed the traffic impact analysis for a development consisting of four office buildings located adjacent to and immediately north of the existing Farmers Insurance building in the northwest quadrant of I-5/Highway 217 Interchange. We would like to offer the following comments regarding the proposed development. The traffic report assumes ODOT's planned improvements to the I-5/Highway 217 Kruse Way Interchange include widening the SW 72nd Ave. overpass from two to five lanes and realigning Huoziker Road to cross Highway 217 and intersect SW 72nd Ave. at Hampton St. This assumption is incorrect because the current design option for the I-5/Highway 217 project includes no operational improvements to the SW 72nd Ave. Interchange. This is for clarification only and does not affect the outcome or findings of the traffic study since the existing lane configuration on SW 72nd Ave. and Hampton St. was used in the analysis by the applicant. Unlike the Homestead Village Hotel development, it does not appear that the proposed development is within the area from which some right-of-way may need to be purchased for the I-5/Highway 217/Kruse Way project. According to the trip distribution shown in the report, approximately 55% of site traffic will travel north along SW 68th Parkway towards the I-5 interchange at Haines St. Along with the 2001 base traffic, there would be considerable traffic traveling on 68th Parkway. We are concerned about how the intersection of 68th Parkway and Dartmouth St./I-5 interchange would operate with these traffic volumes. We would like to request a capacity analysis performed on this intersection to determine whether there is adequate capacity available to handle the traffic volumes. This intersection is currently operating with a four-way stop. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 721-8223. SE:se rni•ozal Art; Martin Jensvold w:TIAR5@217B.5•-#•,->� r +. _JIVED PLANNING RECD AUG 2 6 1996 SEP 121996 L All CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 21, 1996 TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 ➢ FARMER'S INSURANCE < A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 3, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ,,, --12.-,Y- iY-5/f,71.4--3 AA) ;LeC vt -4✓ r ■ (Please provide the fo(dawinginformation) Name of Person(s) C 7, . g• Phone Number(s). ( S SDR 96-0019 k FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1 P�P�I N VA J `t‘< TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE <' FIRE PREVENTION U � 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O. Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076 . (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538 F&RESGJ October 4, 1996 Peter Alto Mackenzie/Saito and Associates P.O. Box 96309 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 Re: Proposed Farmer's Development Review Comments MSA Project No. 296044 Tigard Planning Dept. 96-0019 TVF&R 1081 Dear Peter: Revised plans need to be submitted to this office reflecting all noted and corrected items for review and approval. Unfortunately this was not checked off on the original inspection form. My apologies. Fire flow calculations look acceptable as submitted with the exception of line 9A and B. Only one of the sub-lines in item 9 is credible to a building. Please note the work form has reciprocal instructions from the instruction sheet. Additionally, available fire flow shall be provided on the form. The fire district no longer provides this information even though the footnote reflects that we do. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469 referring to the above noted file number. Sincerely, Adle k 4 ene Birchtll, Plans Examiner GB:kw cc: Will D'Andrea City of Tigard Planning Dept. Jim Funk, Plans Examiner City of Tigard Building D9 otrxrng"Smoke Detectors Save Lives RECEIVED PLANNING • MACKENZIE/S,-u 10 & ASSOCIATES, P.C. OCT 0 71996 ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW.BANCROFT STREET • PO.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9570 • FAX(503)228-1285 September 23, 1996 Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Attention: Gene Birtchell P.O. Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 RE: Proposed Farmers' Development Review Comments MSA Project Number 296044 Dear Gene: In accordance with our meeting on August 29, 1996, we have indicated that the phased development of the Farmers property will begin with the development of the north parcel of land. With that understanding, we have addressed your issues with the Fire and Life Safety Plan Review as follows: Items 1-5: No response required. Item 6: You have indicated that the parking landscape peninsula to the northwest of the north end of Building"A" needs to be rounded to accommodate the required turning radius. The required turning radius for the fire apparatus will be accommodated, and the drawing revised to reflect this requirement. Items 7-8: No response required. Item 9: No parking signs will be provided in the fire apparatus access roadways which include the access isle running north/south to the north of Building`B" and around the access road around the parking area north of building"A." Item 10: No response required. Item 11: Painted curbs will be provided in fire apparatus access roadways in locations as described in Item#9. Item 12 : The locations of the fire hydrants have met with your approval, with the understanding that the buildings served (Buildings"A" and`B")meet the required fire flow calculations for the amount of hydrants. The proposed buildings meet the required fire flow(see the attached fire flow worksheet). F:IWPDATA 96-09196044\23L1.KC Gene Birtchill MSA Project Number 296044 September 23, 1996 Page 2 Item 13: The buildings meet the required distance to fire hydrants; 500 feet for the required hose lay. Reference Sheet 3, Utility and Grading Plan, in the Site Development submittal package. Item 14: No response required. Items 15-17: The buildings comply with these requirements. Reference Sheet 3, Utility and Grading Plan, in the Site Development submittal package. Item 18: Refer to the attached fire flow calculations. Items 19-20: No response required. Item 21: Fire apparatus access roadways and fire-fighting water will be provided as required. Item 22: A Knox Box will be provided for building access. If you have any other questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Peter Alto PA/kc Enclosure c: William D'Andrea- City of Tigard Tamio Fukuyama-Mackenzie/Saito & Associates Tim Echeverria-Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated F:\W PDATA\96-09\96044\23 L 1.KC • P�P'C IN frq` n `�� TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE . FIRE PREVENTION L Q � U 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O. Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076 . (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538 p,F�RESC To: l t L i A-. 1D AOlor -a4- Date: gC/Z g7 Co ❑ WC ❑CC ❑ MC ❑ BV XTI ❑ TU ❑ DU ❑ SH ❑ WI 0 KC Jurisdiction File Number: /[�-'c/5' Project Name: v4 mot. _ v ' oject Ad¢Tess: ¢gam LU°.- 4# . (J f,(�q_ (1'6 zd� e 6 TVF&R File Number:/0 C I - _ (Whenever referring to this project please include thAVFA File N ber) Project approved XProject not approved-Please address items checked below and re-submit plans for review and approval to the: ❑ TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office ❑ Planning Department having jurisdiction for routing to the TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office Project conditionally approved subject to correction of items checked below. This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 Editions of the Uniform Fire Code(UFC)and those sections of the Uniform Building Code(UBC)and Uniform Mechanical Code(UMC)specifically referencing the fire department,and other local ordinances,regulations and guidelines. 1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet.(UFC Sec.902.2.1) 2)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.902.2.1 Exception 1) 3)ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROAD,;. Where there are 20 or more dwellings,an approved second fire apparatus access roadway must be provided to a city/county roadway or access easement.(UFC Sec.902.2.2) 4)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not Less than 20 feet(15 feet for not more than two dwelling units),and an unobstructed vertical clearance of rot less than t3 feet 6 inches.(UFC Sec.902.22.1) 5) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES; Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load)and 50,000 pounds live load(gross vehicle weight).(UFC Sec.902.2.2.2) Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the Aapproved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code. \ 6) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully,as measured from the same center point.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.3) 7)DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.4) 8)BRIDGES: Bridges shall be designed, inspected and final construction approved by a registered engineer. The bridge shall be designed in accordance with the American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges." The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry 50,000 pounds. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.5) \ 9) NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway an' in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall read"NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS y8.8l0" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background.(UFC Sec.901.4.5.(l)(2)&(3)) "Worklnr"Smoke Detectors Save Livec • TVF&R File Number AV-6 10) GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 1.5-"1.t.,,,. percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet.(UFC Sec.902.22.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level(maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. 11)PAINTED CURBS: Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked"NO PARKING FIRE LANE"at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high.(UFC Sec.901.4.5.2) 12)COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less ��yy than one(1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute(GPM)required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for it each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) X13) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS- FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire appatatus access roadway.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) 14) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.22) 15) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.4) !� YC 16) FIRE HYDRANT / FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection(FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.903.42.5) FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief.(1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1) 17)FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS ON BUILDINGS: Fire department connections shall not be located on the building that is being protected.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.5) _L18) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute(GPM)or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office.(UFC Sec.903.3) 19)SINGLE FAMILY_))WELLINGS-REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be I,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s)are 3,600 square feet or larger,the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-1.(UFC Appendix III-A,Sec. 5) 20)RURAL BUILDINGS -REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural buildings shall be calculated in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 1231. Please contact the Fire Marshal's office for special help and other Xrequirements that will apply.(UFC Sec. 903.3) A. 21) ACCESS AND FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision.(UFC Sec. 8704) X22) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an application and instructions regarding installation and placement. . _ E,t.t 5'F`'•"'.• 23)REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: Please contact the Fire Marshal's office at the appropriate times for inspection of the following: 1-- __A.43f-A • 24) 25) DP7o* Q v Plan Reviewer Signature Title cc: Po.�n 1 "a'7 Tualatin Valley Fir -9 -°scue -. Rev. 10-5-94 and Beaverton Fire Department 4755 S.W. Griffith Dr. P.O. Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 (503) 526-2469 FAX 526-2538 REQUIRED FIRE FLOW WORK SHEET Jr TO BE USED WITH FIRE FLOW CALCULATION INSTRUCTIONS Fire Dept Use Only I) Building Name: '�' -�Ppy FMZ 2) Address: Gip Eipsne4(o City/Co • tZ-At3S I 05i. 141-1.e, V.CXX. 3) Type of Structure: (Check 1 Box) Date: ❑ I FR, II FR ❑ II One Hour, III One Hour ❑ IV Heavy Timber, V-One Hour H-N, III-N ❑ V-N 4) Total Building Square Footage: tj 70 'Midst A j •) "'F - - Use the largest aggregate floor area of all floors inclusive of mezzanines as defined .[,/..17. by UBC Section 407 floor area. In Types I and II FR construction only, the three largest successive floor areas shall be used. 5) Building Fire Flow (BFF): S&CC/ from UFC Table A-III-A-1. (See Fire Flow Calculation Instruction Handout, Pg. 8) 6)1 a Single Occupancy Hazard: (BFF) X (Occupancy Factor) = Required Fire Flow (fill in line 8) b Multiple Occupancy Hazard: Occupancy occ sq ft = bldg sq ft = %BAtt Occupancy occ sgft = bldg sgft = %BA Occupancy occ sgft - bldg sgft = %BA Occupancy occ sq ft = bldg sq ft = %BA 7) Occupancy X Factor: % BA X gpm BFF X (occ fact) = FFttt % BA X gpm BFF X (occ fact) = FF % BA X gpm BFF X (occ fact) = FF • BA X gpm BFF X (occ fact) = FF (Fill in Line 8) TOTAL Required Fire FIow W - Sheet _ - Page 2 8) Total Required Fire Flow: 5DOO 6 P• 9) Credited Required Fire Flow: (Use only one of lines a, b, or c) a. Multiply Line 8 by 75% for full fire alarm /Z50 P M or b. Multiply Line 8 by 50% for automatic sprinkler protection ZSD(in GPI or ,_„ c. Multiply Line 8 by 25% •for Zedtral station supervised automatic sprinkler protection 10) Available Fire Flow': t Round off numbers to nearest whole 1-t Building Area ttt Fire Flow Example: Apartment building with garages Type V-N construction, aggregate square footagq,12,1 e i scl_ feet. Garages 3,500 square feet, apartments 8,500 ; {' • ► ` 'f' u�re y`eet,� `' ;be0 gpm. • Apartment 8,500 occ sq ft = 12,000 bldg sq ft = 71% BA Garages 3,500 occ sq ft _ 12,000 bldg sq ft = 29% BA 71% (BA) X 3,000 gpm (BFF) X 1.0 (occ fac) = 2,130 gpm 29% (BA) X 3,000 gpm (BFF) X 1.1 (occ fac) = 957 gpm Total Required Fire Flow 3087 gpm The required fire flow of this building is greater than 3,000 gpm, therefore, either area separation walls (see Fire Prevention Ordinance Sec. 22 or Fire Flow Calculation Instructions, Pg. 3 Sec. 4) complying with UBC Sec. 505(f) would need to be installed or one of the automatic sprinkler alternates or central station supervised alarm system (see Fire Prevention Ordinance Sec. 23E or Fire Flow Calculation Instructions, Pg. 7 Sec. 5(e)). One may also upgrade the type of construction. The same applications are true if required fire flow is greater than available fire flow. 1 . If single occupancy hazard, place answer on Line 8 . If multiple occupancy hazard, skip to line 6b. When multiple occupancy hazards are housed within a single fire flow area, the building fire flow shall be factored out to the ratios of floor areas housing various occupancies. Each portion of the building fire flow for a given occupancy hazard shall be multiplied by the occupancy factor and then added together to produce a required fire flow. 2 . This information is available from the fire district unless the building is in a newly developed area or new fire mains are to be installed. If the latter is the case, please provide engineered calculations showing estimated flows for the area . Mackenzie Engineering,Inc. WATER MAIN SIZED FOR FIRE PROTECTION Project: Farmers Insurance Project No.: 296044 Designer Jeff Hunter Subject: Site Utility Page 1 of 1 Date: 09/24/96 BUILDING TYPE III-N FULLY SPRINKLERED (yes or no) Yes BUILDING SIZE Initially 55,650 SF Ultimate 55,650 SF REQUIRED FIRE FLOW (UFC Appendix III-A, III-A-A-1) Initially 5,000 GPM Ultimate 5,000 GPM FULLY SPRINKLERED REDUCTION 75% Reduction Based on Uniform Fire Code • Initially 1,250 GPM Ultimate 1,250 GPM NO REDUCTION IF NOT FULLY SPRINKLERED Design fire flow 1,250 GPM Residual pressure available at supply main 100 PSI (Verify with flow test) Friction loss per foot 0.009 PSI/FT Length of pipe 500 FT Total loss over pipe length 4.67 PSI Loss through backflow preventer 15 PSI Residual pressure available at furthest point from main ,:',11.116.M PSI PIPE SIZING Size 8, INCH Required Flow 1250 GPM Velocity 8.0 FPS NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS REQUIRED (UFC OR FIRE BUREAU) EACH 250' MAX. DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS DOOR C!1SPRDSHT1296044WA.WF31 RECEIVED PIANNIN( NI \e r- 1 N Vq ,:AUG 19 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE FIRE PREVENTION c \* 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O. Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076 . 503 526-2469 . FAX 5 8 U � ( ) 2b 253 �JF&RESG To: I v L 1.4-w Di > t„) - Date: 9/2 `V7 p WC O CC ❑MC ❑ BV ( 'TI ❑ TU ❑ DU ❑ SH ❑ WI ❑ KC Jurisdiction File Number: /L op Project Name: L�f-i �vz S �,y J✓z.�,z Project Ad ess: 5,K 1� ,�.,F ( j-,(r4( C TVF&R File Number: /40e - -5' (Whenever referring to this project please include the TVF&K File N her) Project approved XProject not approved- Please address items checked below and re-submit plans for review and approval to the: ❑ TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office ❑ Planning Department having jurisdiction for routing to the TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office Project conditionally approved subject to correction of items checked below. This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 Editions of the Uniform Fire Code(UFC)and those sections of the Uniform Building Code(UBC)and Uniform Mechanical Code(UMC)specifically referencing the fire department,and other local ordinances,regulations and guidelines. I) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS; Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet.(UFC Sec. 902.2.1) 2)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1) 3)ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS; Where there are 20 or more dwellings, an approved second fire apparatus access roadway must be provided to a city/county roadway or access easement.(UFC Sec. 902.2.2) 4)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE; Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not 1.ss than 20 feet(15 feet for not more than two dwelling units),and an unobstructed vertical clearance ofnot�ess than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.1) 5) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES; Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load(gross vehicle weight).(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2) Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code. A6) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully,as measured from the same center point.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.3) 7)DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess oil 50 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district.(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4) 8)BRIDGES: Bridges shall be designed, inspected and final construction approved by a registered engineer. The bridge shall be designed in accordance with the American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges." The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry 50,000 pounds. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.5) A. 9) NO PARKING SIGNS; Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway air' it turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS '8.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background.(UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(!)(2)&(3)) "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives Pnec I of 2 TVF&R File Number / "n 10) GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15,1‘4-, percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level(maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. V 11)PAINTED CURBS: Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked"NO PARKING FIRE LANE"at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high.(UFC Sec.901.4.5.2) X 12)COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less k than one(1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute(GPM)required fire flow and one(1)additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) X13) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) 14) siEgLEIAMILY j1WELLINGS__=_FIRLEDMAISM Fire hydrants for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.2) 15)FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.4) 16) FIRE HYDRANT / FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection(FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief.(1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec.904.1.1) 17)FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS ON BUILDINGS: Fire department connections shall not be located on the building that is being protected.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.5) A18) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute(GPM)or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office.(UFC Sec.903.3) 19)SINGLE FAMILY DWELLIN ,S- EQUIRED FIRE.F The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s)are 3,600 square feet or larger,the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-1.(UFC Appendix III-A,Sec.5) 20)RURAL BUILDINGS -REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural buildings shall be calculated in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 1231. Please contact the Fire Marshal's office for special help and other requirements that will apply. (UFC Sec. 903.3) X 21) ACCESS AND FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision.(UFC Sec. 8704) 22)KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an application and instructions regarding installation and placement. 23)REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: Please contact the Fire Marshal's office at the appropriate times for inspection of the following: 24) 25) C1 r� e C nP"OA., l j x Plan Reviewer Signature Title cc: Pagc2of2 i�ll� ljI\ RECEIVED p CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS iANN1NC� AUG 28 DATE: August 21, 1996 1996 TO: Brian Moore, PGE FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 ➢ FARMER'S INSURANCE A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 3, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PleaseprOVide the fo lrauninginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting:- > Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING tJ, 411 SEP ®41996 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 21, 1996 .[IECFEFIVic_ 9() TO: Lee Walker, USA/SWM Program AUG 2 2 1996 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CO I[T CT: William D'Andtea (x315) Phone: (503) ---fax-('593)8844297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 ➢ FARMER'S INSURANCE A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190.000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 3, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Z5 "Poseb74Cr 1Vh, CO Q LCo€. sktL.1b '86 PeRsGevess pesticesn ero .os1 r,t. ! - waive M. a c.Lf FAU 1.l-K IzQ view ., ., (Ple aseprovi&the followinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): I SDR 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING BUG 2 6 1996, ,L ':IIt+ CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 21, 1996 TO: Elaine Self, GTE Engineering FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 ) ➢ FARMER'S INSURANCE < A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 3. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: OeNi es`o P Ek n--1e2 o P(cE. dv CT /t- HoL,F.-S A S EC_tF(cq i ca•}s (1)aseproviI the foiTo ng information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 3 te.Stka!-t Phone Number(s): SO3) 62_0—594-1 SDR 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLAA.. .,G AUG 2 3199 Aili CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 21, 1996 - TO: "Acting" Operations Maintenance Supervisor FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 3, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tkase provide thefo[Cowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: August 21, 1996 TO: David Scott, Building Official AUG 2 2 1996 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 ➢ FARMER'S INSURANCE A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 1 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: hl till € / (.7 / 1/ tnri l +)� v4,2 rr 2-91 /11/ n f 1v/!f l('l a7WD?t- );S ., , 10)Cease pie thefof[owing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: �l1 Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0019 J FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED CITY NOTIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AUG 21 DATE: August 21, 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 ➢ FARMER'S INSURANCE 1 A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 3, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 (P(ease provide the fon-awing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: -- 6-16) Phone Number(s): n SDR 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 21, 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 ➢ FARMER'S INSURANCE A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Tuesday - September 3, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V ., (T1 ase provide theforowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS R',1UEST FOR COMMENT' SDR 4/ -000 N01 .ION LIST FOR LAND USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLIC, (Za! /V l nr 2-0J r CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (circle one) _CIT Area: (W) (S) (E) (C) ID Placed for review in Library CIT Book ED Ft CITY DEPARTMENTS ✓ BLDG. DEPT./David Scott,Bbiding Official ✓_POLICE DEPT./Kelley Jennings,Grine'Neveneonotficer -!SPERATIONS/John Acker,Mo.m.scv:'. _CITY ADMIN./Cathy Wheatley,CtyRecadef _✓ENG.DEPT./Brian Roger,Development Review Engineer _COM.DEV.DEPT./D.S.T:S ADV.PING./Nadine Smith, Planning Supervise. ,WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Oct peions Mgt./ope.otins MoA Box SPECIAL DISTRICTS / 4 FIRE MARSHALL UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY f!TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa.County Fire District 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro,OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA.CO.DEPT.OF LAND USE&TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N.First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#16,Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland,OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) _STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _METRO _Mike Borreson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 Mary Weber _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,OR 97225-0412 600 NE Grand Avenue _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland,OR 97232-2736 Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1 175 Court Street,N.E. ODOT/REGION 1 CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem,OR 97310-0590 Laurie Nicholson/Trans.Planning Larry Conrad,Senior Planner 123 N.W.Flanders PO Box 4755 _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 1 120 SW 5th _CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland,OR 97204 ODOT/REGION 1,DISTRICT 2-A Mike Matteucci,Neighborhood Coordinator Bob Schmidt/Engineering Coord. PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412 Beaverton,OR 97076 Planning Director Portland,OR 97225 Beaverton,OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard,OR 97281-3483 City Manager PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin,OR 97062 _4rOTHER9 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _CITY OF KING CITY City Manager 15300 SW 116th King City,OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES y. /GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC L PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Elc:ne Self,Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 _J NW NATURAL GAS CO. Phone:(sa3)721.2w+ _ AREA COMMUNICATIONS _METRO TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer fax:(303)721.2502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox,Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _ ICI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Clifford C.Cabe,Const.Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 5424 SE McLoughlin Portland,OR 97201 Portland.OR 97204 Portland,OR 97202 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES AERONAUTICS DIVISION(ODOT) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS — US POSTAL SERVICE _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H.PARK _FISH&WILDLIFE Randy Hammock,Growth Cord. _PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY _U.S.ARMY CORPS.OF ENGINEERS Portland,OR 97229-9998 OTHER __-- h:\login\potN\masten\ncnofic.mst MAILING RECORDS A ..„. , • City of Tigard,Orcgou AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirrn, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. n That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: IQ`w'ao..00..•applicable) {Cf>eck agagrapnarle 001 Delay? (Enter Pubic Heanng Date aoove) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council V That I served NOTICE OF AMENDED ( 0) DECISION FOR: lam•.........••r•a City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: t i••sbew....•c.bio faiecx appnopnate box below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council 1 ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISIO ' *TICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which s ttached, marked Exhibit "A", was ) d • each/na, eyt erson(s) at the addresys(s) shown on the attached list ), marked Exhibit"B" h- / day • " l Ll' 199(-7 , and deposited in th Unit States it on ArA; da •f li 199 postage prepaid. ^�t� 70ki prepared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the // of - ? ....Aks. , •# 7 -, 4 " r':lb' I-.-irll/ NOTARY PUBLIC.OT OREGON My Commission E ires: FILE INFO.: 7.---,- NAME(s): 4 fL-C/ CASE NO(S): 9)( IG-0i9 TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 CITY OF TIOARD FARMERS INSURANCE SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: FARMERS INSURANCE Site Development Review SDR 96-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 191,650 square foot office complex. APPLICANT: Gerding/Edlen Development OWNER: FIG Holding Company 2525 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 201 4600 Wilshire Boulevard Portland, OR 97201 Los Angeles, CA 90010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Office). ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Commercial). LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; WCTM 2S1 01DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, and 2200. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-417t) 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sidewalk work, sanitary and storm sewer taps, water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) sets of the proposed public improvement plans for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a permit from the Engineering Department has been issued. Financial assurance equal to 100 percent of the cost of the public improvements, a Developer-Engineer Agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee (if applicable) are required. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall dedicate a public pedestrian/bicycle path easement for placement of a 6-foot-wide sidewalk on the north/east side of SW 68th Avenue. The sidewalk shall be constructed in a meandered alignment similar to the existing sidewalk on the south/west side of the roadway. The applicant shall construct the sidewalk as part of Phase I (Buildings A and B) and the easement width should be wide enough to accommodate the entire sidewalk. 5. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW 66th Avenue. 6. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on standard City forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on, and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 8. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall record the appropriate private utility easements to allow the proposed private sanitary, water, and storm sewer lines to cross over property lines. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 2 9. The street opening permit shall include the private storm pipe crossing of SW 68th Avenue. Any portion of the private storm pipe within the public Right-of-way (ROW) shall be constructed to public standards. 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations, for review and approval. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the site improvement drawings to be reviewed by the Building Division. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 12. The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. 13. Plans approved by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 14. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. Impervious surface/landscaping calculations shall be submitted which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will be provided. The applicant shall provide total site calculations, as well as calculations provided with each phase of the development. B. Nine (9) disabled parking spaces for phase one, and eight (8) disabled parking spaces for phase two. C. Seventeen (17) bicycle parking spaces for phase one, and nineteen (19) bicycle parking spaces for phase two. D. Location of a loading space for each building. The location and design of such spaces shall be approved by the City Engineer E. Walkway connection with the existing concrete walk shown to connect with the Farmers Insurance building. F. Written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. G. Mitigation plan that provides for mitigation of 1,794 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to provide a mitigation plan based upon the removal of trees associated with each phase. Tree removal shall not be allowed prior to the applicant providing resolution to the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) right-of-way property. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 3 15. A letter from the consulting arborist that verifies that tree protection measures have been installed according to the tree protection specifications submitted with the application. 16. Prior to the release of any permits for phase two (south side of 68th Avenue), the applicant shall provide documentation of resolution of the ODOT right-of-way issue. The applicant shall provide proof of ownership of that portion of land which is currently ODOT right-of-way. If the applicant does not obtain ownership of the subject property, the plans shall be revised and a new site development review application shall be submitted for development of phase two. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 17. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements. 18. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A Lot Line Adjustment (MIS 96-0011) was approved on tax lots 200, 300, 400, 500, 700, and 2200. No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located north of Highway 217, south of SW Hampton Street, west of SW 66th Avenue, and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue. Properties to the north, south and west are zoned C-P (Professional Commercial). Property to the north and south are developed with commercial (office) uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site consists of approximately 12.49 acres, is presently vacant, and contains a number of mature trees. There is approximately 6.88 acres south of SW 68th Parkway and approximately 5.61 acres north of SW 68th Parkway. There is a forested ravine, with moderate to steep slopes, along the southwest portion of the property. There are approximately 8,937 square feet (.2 acres) of wetlands within the narrow channelized bottom of the drainage swale. The proposal will not encroach into the ravine or wetland area. The NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 4 applicant is proposing to construct a four (4) building, 191,650 square foot office complex. Access to the site will be provided from SW 68th Parkway and SW 66th Avenue. The proposal will be developed in two phases. Phase one will be the development of the northern portion of the site and phase two will be the development of the southern portion of the site. All site improvements required to support phase one will be in place prior to construction of phase two. The revised site plan (dated 10/14/96) shows lot lines which zig-zag through the parking areas. This plan gives the appearance that there are four (4) parcels underlying this development. This plan is not accurate. The lot lines as shown on this plan have not been approved by the City of Tigard, nor have they been recorded by the County. The tax lots which do exist are those involved in the 1996 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS 96-0011) and are identified as WCTM 2S1 01 DA, tax lots 100, 200, 300, 400, and 2200. A separate application will have to be made if the applicant wishes to adjust the property lines to reflect those shown on the subject plan. This will be required in order to gain building permits from the Building Division. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build office buildings. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Professional and Administrative Services. Code Section 18.64.030 lists Professional and Administrative Services as a permitted use in the C-P zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.64.050 states that the minimum lot area is 6,000 square feet and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet for parcels in the C-P zoning district. The site is approximately 12.49 acres and has a width of approximately 490 feet, thereby, exceeding the required minimum lot size and width requirement. Developments within the C-P zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has not provided calculations regarding the amount of impervious surface and landscaping. Impervious surface/landscaping calculations shall be submitted which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will be provided. The applicant shall provide total site calculations, as well as, calculations provided with each phase of the development. Setbacks: Section 18.64.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except 20 feet shall be required where the C-P zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet. Setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing building heights of 32 feet, well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 5 with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There is a forested ravine, with moderate to steep slopes along the southwest portion of the property. There are approximately 8,937 square feet (.2 acres) of wetlands within the narrow channelized bottom of the drainage swale. The proposal will not encroach into the ravine or wetland area. There are approximately 400 trees on the property. Given the location of the buildings, parking area, and accessways, as well as the grading required to accommodate this proposal, approximately 168 of the existing trees will be removed. An arborist report has been submitted that addresses preservation of trees on the property. In accordance with Section 18.150, trees greater than 12-inch caliper will be mitigated. The proposed plan also includes new parking lot and street trees. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria is not applicable as this proposal does not abut a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130). Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site plan, parking and storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's lighting plan and has no comments or objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 6 Phased Development: Section 18.120.050 allows approval of a time schedule for developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than three years without reapplying for site development review. The criteria for approving a phased site development review proposal is that the following are satisfied: 1. The public facilities are constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. All public facilities required to serve each phase shall be constructed in conjunction with, or prior to, each phase. Each phase will contain all the site improvements necessary to function as a distinct development. 2. The development and occupancy of any phase is not dependent on the use of temporary public facilities (a temporary facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard). The applicant is not proposing the use of any temporary public facilities. 3. The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required by an approved development proposal. The applicant shall construct all necessary improvements to serve this development. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). As indicated on the site plan, street trees have been provided in accordance with this section. Street trees will consist of a mix of preserved trees and newly proposed trees. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. While the site plans do not reflect landscape planters within the parking lot areas, the landscape plan shows the provision of parking lot trees. The plan shows that the distribution of parking lot trees will provide for the required canopy effect, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 7 obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, vision clearance will be provided in accordance with this section. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(C)(1) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor space for Administrative and Professional Services. The 91,560 square feet of office buildings on phase one requires 262 parking spaces. The proposed plan indicates that 436 spaces have been provided with phase one. The 100,000 square feet of office buildings on phase two requires 286 parking spaces. The proposed plan indicates that 378 spaces have been provided with phase two. The proposed plan, therefore, satisfies this requirement. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 9 disabled parking spaces if 401 to 500 parking spaces are provided and requires 8 disabled parking spaces if 301 to 400 parking spaces are provided. Phase one, therefore, requires nine (9) disabled parking spaces and phase two requires eight (8) disabled spaces. The plan shows the provision of eight (8) disabled parking spaces for phase one. The plan does not show the provision of disabled parking spaces for phase two. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides for nine (9) disabled parking spaces for phase one, and eight (8) disabled parking spaces for phase two, in accordance with this section. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Seventeen (17) bicycle parking spaces will be required for phase one of this development. Nineteen (19) bicycle parking spaces will be required for phase two of this development. The plan shows that ten bicycle parking spaces are provided with phase one. The plan does not indicate the provision of bicycle parking spaces for phase two. A revised plan shall be submitted which shows the provision and location of seventeen (17) bicycle parking spaces for phase one and nineteen (19) bicycle parking spaces for phase two. Off-Street Loading spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The applicant's narrative states that a loading dock has been provided for the 55,650 square foot building and that service entries will be provided at each of the three remaining buildings. The site plan shows the provision of a 15- foot-wide loading area for building 'A' although the elevation plan does not clearly show the provision of a loading area. The applicant shall revise the plans to identify the location of a loading space for each building, in accordance with this section. The location and design of such spaces shall be approved by the City Engineer. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 8 Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require more than 100 parking spaces provide two (2) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet or one (1) access with a minimum width of 50 feet and a minimum pavement width of 40 feet. The preliminary plan shows the provision of four (4) access drives on SW 68th Avenue. Each phase will be served by two (2) access drives. The accesses onto SW 68th Avenue are a minimum of twenty-four (24) feet-wide, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The plan partially complies with this section. The plan shows the provision of walkways which extend from the building entrances to SW 68th Avenue, in accordance with this section. The plan does not provide a connection with the existing concrete walk shown to connect with the Farmers Insurance building. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides a walkway connection with this existing walkway. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans show the provision of trash enclosures. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding these locations. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant has provided a report and plan that identifies all existing trees greater than six (6) inches in caliper. The inventory identified 400 trees greater than 12-inch caliper. The proposed plan will be removing 168 trees greater than 12-inch caliper, for a total of 3,589 caliper inches. Since the applicant is NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 9 retaining from 50 to 75 percent of the 400 existing trees, Section 18.100.025(B)(2)(c) requires a mitigation program, according to Section 18.150.070.D, of 50 percent of the trees removed. The applicant shall, therefore, provide a mitigation plan that provides for mitigation of 1 ,794 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to provide a mitigation plan based upon the removal associated with each phase. Tree removal shall not be allowed prior to the applicant providing resolution to the ODOT right-of-way property. The arborist report provides a summary of the required mitigation. The report identifies 1,794 caliper inches which requires mitigation. The report estimates that if a mitigation tree of 3-inch caliper size were provided, then 598 trees would be the total number of mitigation trees required to satisfy this section. The report subtracts 200 trees as this is the number of trees proposed on the landscape plan, and concludes that a total of 398 trees would remain to be planted to comply with the mitigation plan. Section 18.150.070(E) states that a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. The arborist report includes an estimate from a landscape company of the cost to install 398, 3-inch caliper trees. It appears that the applicant may elect to compensate the City for replacement. The method of estimating the cost is acceptable to the City. The report subtracted 200 trees because this was approximately the number of trees shown on the landscape plan. The City requires the planting of trees (ie..street, parking lot, buffering) as a standard condition for development. Such trees are required irregardless of the existing vegetation on the property. To be counted as "mitigation" for the removal of a valued amenity on a property, mitigation is; that which is above and beyond that which is a standard requirement. Therefore, the 200 trees identified in the arborist report cannot be counted as outright mitigation. The typical caliper size for a street tree and parking lot tree is a 2-inch caliper. If the landscape plan shows the provision of 3-inch caliper trees, the 1-inch caliper that is above and beyond the typical 2-inch caliper tree can be counted toward total caliper mitigation. The allowable mitigation would then be 200 caliper inches or 66, 3-inch caliper trees. The total number of trees to be mitigated would, therefore, be 532 (598 minus 66) trees. At an estimated cost of $166.00 each, the total cost for compensating the City to replace those trees would be $88,312.00. To provide for compliance with this section, a revised mitigation plan shall be submitted. The plan shall provide for mitigation of 1,794 caliper inches. This plan may provide for on- site, off-site, or compensation mitigation. The applicant may: subtract the "above and beyond" caliper inches for trees which are required landscaping, revise the estimated compensation, or revise the plan to provide greater preservation of trees. Signs: Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Services Technicians. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 10 PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS: A transportation impact analysis was submitted by Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. (MEI), dated August 1, 1996. This report analyzed the potential impact of the proposed driveway locations on 68th Parkway, as well as the potential impact on several intersections in the vicinity from additional trip generation from the development. It was found that all proposed driveways will operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) under the estimated traffic for the year 2001. The major intersections analyzed in the study were: 1. Hampton Street/SW 72nd Avenue 2. Hampton Street/SW 68th Parkway 3. Southwest 68th Parkway/SW 66th Avenue. Based on the findings of the MEI report, the development of this project will not have a negative impact on any of the three intersections above. All intersections will operate a LOS "C" or better, which is acceptable. Traffic signal and left-turn lane warrants were also considered by MEI for the Hampton Street/SW 68th Parkway intersection. The report indicates that for year 2001 traffic volumes, including projected traffic from this project, warrants for a left turn lane and signal are not met. ODOT commented that they desired MEI to also analyze the intersection of Dartmouth Street/SW 68th Parkway. ODOT was concerned about the effect of the additional traffic from this site on the existing 1-5 interchange at that location. MEI submitted a supplement to their traffic study, dated September 25, 1996. The supplemental report indicates that currently this intersection operates at LOS A in the AM peak hours and LOS B during the PM peak. With development of this site, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service, specifically LOS A during the AM peak, and LOS C or D during the PM peak. ODOT sent a follow-up response, dated October 11, 1996 indicating that they concurred with MEI's findings and had no further comment. In summary, based on the findings of the transportation analysis and the supplemental report submitted by MEI, no off-site street or intersection improvements are warranted or proposed. STREETS: SW 68th Parkway: SW 68th Parkway is classified as a major collector street and is fully improved adjacent to this site, with the exception of a sidewalk on the north/east side of the street. The existing 5-foot wide walkway on the south/west side of the street meanders inside a 15-foot wide NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 11 public pedestrian/bicycle easement. In pre-application discussions with the applicant, the City indicated that a walkway with similar alignment should be provided on the north/east side. The current width standard for a sidewalk on a major collector street is 6 feet. The applicant expressed a concern with this because the current right-of-way (ROW) is not quite wide enough to allow for this width of sidewalk and suggested the City accept a public easement for the sidewalk in similar fashion to what exists on the south side. Staff concurs with this suggestion and has proposed a condition to reflect this concept. SW 66th Avenue: SW 66th Avenue is classified as a local commercial & industrial street. It once was a frontage roadway controlled by ODOT, but in 1981 ODOT relinquished its interest in the ROW to the City of Tigard. Since that date, the roadway has been primarily used by local traffic and does not experience heavy traffic loads. During pre-application discussions with the applicant, the applicant expressed a desire to obtain a portion of the 66th Avenue ROW, specifically at the very south end adjacent to the intersection with 68th Parkway. City staff have discussed this proposal and concur with the applicant that the ROW could be vacated. The City's Transportation Plan does not indicate that this street will be upgraded in the future, nor does it require the street to be extended to the south (there are no other properties for the street to serve). In order to vacate the portion of the ROW proposed by the applicant, the City must deem the ROW as surplus, according to the 1981 agreement with ODOT. Once this is completed, ODOT would then allow the applicant to purchase the ROW. City staff will approach the City Council on November 11, 1996 with a recommendation to declare the portion of ROW as surplus. The vacation of the ROW is necessary in order for the applicant to build Phase II of the project (Buildings C and D) as proposed. All indications from ODOT are that they will sell the ROW to the applicant. Staff recommends that prior to issuance of any site or building permits for Phase II (Buildings C or D) that this issue be resolved. If, for some reason, the applicant is unsuccessful in obtaining the property, they will need to revise their plans for Phase II and resubmit for a new Site Development Review. The status of SW 66th Avenue is a two-lane paved street with no curbs on either side. ODOT has future plans to expand the interchange of 1-5 at Highway 217. These improvements may result in a need to relocate portions of SW 66th Avenue to the west. However, preliminary plans for the ODOT improvements suggest that no part of the subject site will be affected by the future project. Staff discussed potential street improvements for 66th Avenue with the applicant during pre-application meetings. Staff indicated that any improvements required would be consistent with the local commercial and industrial street standard, unless otherwise suggested by the applicant's transportation study. No special improvement of 66th Avenue is recommended by the transportation study submitted by the applicant, therefore the local commercial and industrial standard will be used. Since there is the potential for realignment of 66th Avenue in the future when ODOT improves the interchange, the City recommends that no street improvements be built by the applicant until such time the ODOT improvement impacts become more defined. The applicant could enter into an agreement whereby they waive their right to remonstrate against the formation of a future local improvement district to improve the street. Staff recommends the applicant enter into such an agreement. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 12 WATER: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There is an existing 8-inch public water line in SW 68th Avenue that the applicant proposes to serve the new buildings from. Any connections to the water line in 68th Avenue shall be approved and permitted through TVWD. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line in SW 68th Avenue, and in the ROW of SW 66th Avenue, that can serve this site. The applicant's plan submittal for the site development review did not indicate how sewer service would be extended to the four new buildings. However, Staff has been able to review proposed construction plans for Buildings A and B and notes that new sanitary sewer laterals will need to be extended from the main line to the buildings. Likewise, the other two buildings will need sewer laterals extended. This work will require a permit from the Engineering Department. The plan indicates that there will be private utility lines crossing over property lines in order to serve all four buildings. This is acceptable provided the applicant records the appropriate private utility easements. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall record any necessary private utility easements. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site naturally flows to the south and east toward 1-5. There are two locations where storm pipes enter the ODOT ROW of 1-5. The first location is just south of where 68th Parkway intersects with 66th Avenue. Storm water from 68th Avenue is collected in a public storm pipe that discharges into an existing 18-inch storm pipe that crosses 1-5. The other location is further south where an existing drainage area (between this site and the Farmer's Insurance building site) is collected and discharges into a 24- inch storm pipe that enters the ODOT ROW; from there, the water enters a much larger 84-inch diameter pipe. The applicant has coordinated with the ODOT hydraulics engineer with respect to the potential impact generated from this development. The applicant proposes to convey the on-site storm water to the southern end of the development area and detain it in an on-site water quality/detention pond before discharging the water into the existing 24-inch storm pipe. ODOT has indicated that they do not have a concern with this concept but the applicant should limit their peak discharge volume to the undeveloped 50-year storm event. The preliminary calculations indicate that the proposed pond site will have more than enough capacity to handle the storage of the 50-year storm event. The proposed pond is shown on property not owned by the applicant. There is a memo in the applicant's materials which indicate the owner plans to purchase additional property for the pond. If the applicant can not obtain the additional property, they will at least need to obtain a private storm drainage easement from the adjacent owner or relocate the pond on the subject property. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 13 The applicant's plan proposes to convey storm water from the northerly portion of the site across SW 68th Avenue to reach the southern portion of the site and the pond. The plan shows a new private storm pipe that would need to cross the public street. Staff reviewed this option and, although it is not generally recommended to allow private storm drainage pipes within a public ROW, it appears to be warranted in this case. Without the crossing, the applicant would need to place a second pond on the north side of the street, treat and detain the storm water, then release it into the existing storm pipe in 68th Avenue. However, they would need to open cut most of 68th Avenue to reach the existing storm pipe which lies on the southern edge of the street. Therefore, either option will result in a private pipe within the ROW. The applicant's plan for one pond to serve the entire site is desirable from a cost and maintenance standpoint. A property owner will experience less cost and effort in maintaining one facility rather than multiple facilities. Staff therefore recommends that the applicant's storm pipe plan concept be approved. Staff further recommends that the applicant be required to construct the portion of private storm pipe within the ROW to our public standards (materials, installation, etc.). The applicant's engineer has indicated that they will comply with City standards. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated previously, there will be a pond located near the southern end of the development area. This pond will act as a water quality and storm water detention facility. Preliminary calculations indicate the pond will adequately treat the anticipated storm water runoff. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 14 EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are no existing overhead utility lines adjacent to this site. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division states that the applicant shall provide for the removal of all underlying property divisions, provide fire flow test of all fire hydrants in the immediate area, and provide a geotechnical soils report for each building site. The City of Tigard Police Department and Maintenance Services Department have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency states that a 25-foot protective corridor should be preserved adjacent to the sensitive area, and that a water quality facility is required. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue states that revised plans shall be submitted that reflect all noted and corrected items for review and approval. A previous Fire and Life Safety Review had identified items that the plan needed to address. Oregon Department of Transportation initially stated they are concerned about how the intersection of 68th Parkway and Dartmouth Street/Interstate-5 interchange would operate with the reported traffic volumes. ODOT requested that a capacity analysis be performed on this intersection to determine whether there is adequate capacity available to handle the traffic volumes. ODOT received and reviewed an additional traffic analysis and concurs that the intersection should continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. Tualatin Valley Water District states that the applicant shall provide easements for existing water lines. GTE states that the developer/owner to place conduit/manholes as per GTE's specifications. PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 15 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON OCTOBER 28, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. • Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 28, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 6 cr2///t(w October 17, 1996 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Associate Planner October 17, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\CURPLN\will\SDR96-16.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0019-FARMERS INSURANCE PAGE 16 • I . . • = ' ,‘ .• gra in ■■ 72 . ml rri ..-1 • M . LIT:Ez som, X "0 044 4 1 \ p1A.07:01::::Cs::•INS.7001 /MING/1.01,10CD I.PLO. .... 2,4 C0•00•CT IIMMI .1,a sruiimap .0.to FAL CO "MI / (....... C =21 an IIIMP•Arlyi r 77.....7-\ T ____-----\---- I . Thl- -- ---.-17,1- E r- : L > .. ...___ .... , ....., _ . ill rj ( ......„. L . , •■•••• , 0 .., • i II ,.. ! ti "L=2-711- . i_t__ n, ii NEN.....-\ — ri tgltlri IZIKLILLOW1 — --e---;"- , 11.1:11:i: _I I / I I: 1 . .... ... I T .......,,,,,,,,,. . 2-INCIPW co) 0 ZIMILILL0110 - ... • ILINLI MM.. ME. ........ \ ., IL CD CO (1) k- wi -- .____ __ ._ ) = ■■■■ = it II ,....„ en co = -... _ ... .-- = 0 . ...... _ ... MD k - = ......... mom g a• CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT . 46 ezi ,., •_ ir I I f l ; . , VFLAN. ST I'II I ST u1i_ ir ii . j 11 4,_ , i,. his IIIIM [5l w N ' IN 1SUBJEIL!k I !MINNIE" Pi i. ._ S 1 0 CI C II C FIR LP Sy `� Ca ati..BEIM li 1-cr„ all I 111111 P. SANDBURG ST Ci 0 al It .. . a : 0 lik % Ill (I..) , V,N, ii . AL DIJA:. ■ Vicinity_V r✓ SDR 96-0019 1 Farmer's Insurance «,e Nep„not to.aie ------- --– ..1—"---J rPtartfirs ins . D-Dk qle-Cciq ( 1°-PI) 2S101 DA-02100 GERDING/EDLEN DEVELOPMENT BLOODWORTH, ROBERT L ET AL 2525 SW 1ST AVENUE, SUITE 201 c/o HEALTH RESOURCES INC PORTLAND OR 97201 P 0 BOX 987 TUALATIN,OR 97062 EXHIBIT 13 • F I G HOLDING CO 2S101 DA-00400 REAL ESTATE ACCTG. FIG HOLDING CO ATTN: RUBY COURTLAND REAL ESTATE AC 4680 WILSHIRE BLVD ATTN OURTLAND LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 4 0 WILSHIRE BLVD 2S101DA-00300 2S101DA-00700 FIG HOLDING CO . FIG HOLDING CO REAL ESTATE G REALESTATACCTG ATTN: COURTLAND ATTN:Rktf3Y COURTLAND 0 WILSHIRE BLVD 4686WILSHIRE BLVD 2S101DA-00300 2S101DA-00200 FIG HOLDING CO FIG HOLDING CO REAL ESTATE G REAL ESTATE A ATTN: R COURTLAND ATTN:R OURTLAND 4 WILSHIRE BLVD 4 ILSHIRE BLVD 2S101DA-02200 2S101DA-00400 F I G HOLDING CO F I G HOLDING CO REAL ESTATE G REAL ESTATE G ATTN: COURTLAND ATTN: COURTLAND 4 WILSHIRE BLVD WILSHIRE BLVD 2S101DA-00100 2S101DA-00100 F I G HOLDING COMPANY F I G HOLDING COMPAN REAL ESTATE AC REAL ESTATE A ATTN: R ' OURTLAND ATTN: R COURTLAND •.:•WILSHIRE BLVD 4680-WILSHIRE BLVD 2S101AD-01300 2S101AD-03400 FERNANDEZ, PHILIP H AND PACIFIC REALTY ASSOC! P CATHERINE F 15115 SW E4 KWY#200-WMI 6803 SW WHEATLAND RUN PBRTLAND,OR 97224 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 2 S 101 AD-03500 2S 101 AD-03200 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES LP PACIFIC REALTY ASSOC e P 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#200-WMI 15115 SW S •-: • 'KWY#200-WMI PORTLAND,OR 97224 Pe- •ND,OR 97224 PAPE, PROPERTIES & PAPE, TERRANCE/TOOKE, DIAN & 2S101DA-01900 PAPE, SHIRLEY N SHEARER&SONS INC 7000 SW VARNS ST PO BOX 407 EUGENE OR 97440 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 DD-00101 2S 101 AD-03100 WESTON HOLDING CO LLC WESTON INVESTMENT CO 2154 NE BROADWAY 2154 NE BROADWAY PORTLAND,OR 97232 PORTLAND,OR 97232 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8657 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 R E C F v t u Legal Notice Advertising l' -r 2 .1 1996 • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice IiM OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affid^ :4 SITE DEVELOPMENT REEVIEW(SDR) 96-0019 • Accounts Payable • >FARMER'S INSURANCE< The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of four(4)build- ing, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of S.W.66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of S.W. 68th Avenue; AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (WCTM 2S1 01DA,Tax Lots 100,200,300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows STATE OF OREGON, )ss public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) professional and administrative services,financial, insurance, and real es- tate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. I, Kathy Snyder APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising , Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard–Tualatin Times 18.150 and 18.164. a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 _ and 193.020; published at_ Ti garb - —in the — — _ aforesaid county and state; that the .. -- AII I ll SDR96-0019 Farmer ' s Insurance — •A�%�, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the MMI is entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and 1 consecutive in the following issues: i �� October 17 ,1996 1 - UBJECT Nil Lf.) ill-PI I5J 1 I lo 14 Kcr.,(4.46 334,„Lig."._ il 4.,Subscribed and sworn t efore me this 17th day of October, 1111 ell �� i �Q�__, ``1 t 1111111111111 1111111h. I, 1,654.1w . 6, Notar9lic for Oregon Ii1 My Commission Expires: IN PAFFIDAVIT � f ..a.dmod ,„ shi-)wp ■■■■■. liii oi L..... The adopted finding of facts,decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on October 28, 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accor- dance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Com- munity Development Code,which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M., October 28, 1996. TT8657–Publish October 17, 1996. GONZAGA ST . 8 I ■ 8- ill 111 MI C 2. 01AD031 I 0 12S101AD03511 01AD0 • 2S 98 53400 ..+ 25111 01300 CO EL 2S10 D' 10400 la i 'S1l1DA00300 � 2S101D'MA01-08 2S101D10 DA90100 .1 CI 2S1 1 DA00700 . mink C 25101 D' ��t00 2 A0020S VAR S ST _ !la4I• 00 CL I 1 1 1 DA►1900 L IR LP El) -S-z.F i 2S101DA02200 7 2S 01DA12100 p O 25101 DDOOR0101 DD► 101 Zlill AN.: - U ' I Vicinity Map A , SDR 96-0019 Notification Map : , aw N i t bv: MACKENZIE 5032281285; 07/30/96 3.14PM;Jetfax #49; Page 2/4 ,,1„:-.A„ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON M_ DE LO' _ T ,EVI •P .CATI0N ITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, igard, Oregon 97223 - (303) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. 7DRgto--00)q OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: • GENERAL TNFOR,'1ATION Application elements submitted: tOPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION North / adjacent to the (A) Application form (1) xisting Farmer's Ins. Building on 68th Parkway 1 (B) Owaer' s signature/written AX MAP AND TAX LOT N0. 2S1 1DA Tax Lots 300, 200, 400 authorization 00, and 2200 T [ (C) Title transfer instrument (1) ITTS SIZE 12.49 ac (D) Assessor' s map ( 1) t3PERTY OcNER/DEED HOLDER* Farmer's Ins. Group (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) 3DRESS 4680 Wilshire Blvd, 2nd FtHONE (F) Applicant's statement ITY Los Angeles , CA ZIP 90010 - (pre-app checklist) ?PLICANT* Gerding/Edlen Development (G) List of property owners and DRESS 2525 SW 1st Ave, Ste. 201PHowz. 299-6000 addresses with;a 250 feet (1) ON Portland, OR ZIP 97201 (3) Filing fee (t ) When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate .cple, the applicant must be the purchaser of record a Leasee .a possession with written authorizatioa DATE DETERMINED 70 BE COMPLETE: om the owner or an agent of the owner with written thorizario. The owner(s) must sign this olication in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: omit a written authorization with this application. CORP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to M.P.O. Number: allow an office complex. The proposed development includes (4) office buildings, '-??=0'73'- Date: totaling 190,000 SF with two buildings on Final 4po_ova? Date: each side of 68th Parkway Plean±mod Iaginee__ng 'P/_3P 'd 5/87 �t by: MACKENZIE 5032281285; 07/30/96 3:44PM;,f X #49; Page 314 List any variance, conditional use sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part at this application: Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. THE APPLICANT(5) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions chat may be attached co or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the aPplieants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this c7,/ day of 6.-.72, l9 14 ATURSS of each nr (eg, husband and wife) of the subject property. Mr. ark Edlen, Gerding/Edlen Development pm/052z,p) .44# CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0019 FILE TITLE: FARMER'S INSURANCE GERDING/EDLEN DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: Farmer's Insurance Group OWNER: Gerding/Edlen Development 4680 Wilshire Blvd., 2nd floor 2525 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 201 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Portland, OR 97201 (503) (503) 299-6000 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a four (4) building, 190,000 square foot office complex. LOCATION: West of SW 66th Avenue and on both the north and south sides of SW 68th Avenue; (WCTM 2S1 01 DA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400 and 2200). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, transient lodging, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: _ 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (503) 639-4171 x315 SDR 96-0019 FARMER'S INSURANCE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS August 9, 1996 CITY sttrik OF TIGARD OREGON Beth Zauner Mackenzie / Saito & Associates 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO BOX 69039 Portland, OR 97201-0039 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal Dear Ms. Zauner: The Planning Division has conducted a preliminary review of SDR 96-0019, an application for Site Development Review, and have found that certain application materials were not provided with the submittal. The Planning Division is unable to consider the application complete and continue processing the application pending submission of the following items and plan notes: 1.) Preliminary sizing calculations for the water quality facility. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, William D'Andrea Assistant Planner is\curpin\wiII\sdr96-19.ftr c. SDR 96-0019 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • PO.BOX 69039 PORTLAND.OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9570 • FAX(503)228-1285 August 12, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Mr. Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8199 Re: Application Completeness Farmers Insurance Property City of Tigard Case#SDR 96-0019 MSA Project Number 296044 Dear Will: The enclosed preliminary sizing calculations for the water quality facility for the above-mentioned project responds to your letter dated August 9, 1996, regarding Notice of Incomplete Submittal. It is our understanding that with the submittal of this information, our application will be complete. It is further our understanding that a decision on the application will be rendered approximately eight weeks after the date of determination of completeness. Please contact Tamio Fukuyama, Tim Echeverria, or me with any additional questions or concerns related to this application. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Beth auner BZ/kc Enclosure c: Mark Edlen- Gerding/Edlen Development Company Rick Saito, Tamio Fukuyama, Tom Wright - MSA Tim Echeverria-Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated F:\WPDATA\96-08\96044\12L1.KC CITY OF TIGARD OREGON August 20, 1996 Beth Zauner Mackenzie/Saito & Associates 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO BOX 69039 Portland, OR 97201-0039 Re: SDR 96-0019 Dear Ms. Zauner: This letter is to inform you that your application for Site Development Review (SDR 96-0019) is considered complete and has been accepted by the Planning Department. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, William D'Andrea Assistant Planner i:lcurpinlwilllsdr96-19 It2 c. SDR 96-0019 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON c•YC«ac• I SCALE I'= 100' `Yaa'"a'' SEE MAP SEE MAP l 23 I IAC I 2S I IAD I Y.• n I I PONT • I 600 500 300 . Zac. 100 I 1 .74 Ac. 2..04ac I 1 I E I I +1' . I a I I 1 i 2 I I I C. � I I Xi ''1?I' I, Iv I a 1 1 0 x 7 s 1 . I I . 10 P I \ \ s,s / I .., I i 1-- I ;14 -:::41,;,:. ,,,,,,,,,, / ,o```�f`y I \,'o�,o Os.,S W. PARKWAY = " ,/ I I ;I I la 1 .47.4c , 23- 81 1 i 7, , . 1 1 sii\ , ... ._ -. • ., I . X Tole 26125"E S.W VARNS STREET '' /IV N mxb _ VACATED .......Y.........iiG...,...,.,,.9,.,.,,,,,.,,w�.................R...,..,.,.,iio 0e,.......�— —--1 — — yip I 1 SEE MAP 1100 1000 900 1 `�{ 1 1 I OP"aii zs I IDB iBAa 37ac 4c. 'A's I I I fl �� a s O I I Z I 1 I M Q I 1 11D N � ° GY I 1 I FIR LOOP '1.% sOO !" r I I ii 3 Ya=' 1200 3 cy_ I. 4 S •I 6 I .1 Q RI SW FIR - - a_. '�6ADe y� I $1 :I 1 STREET g ' § _ �- .� �• I I r "°"� tl U =Y ..�C La' 151\J Tv- r ' rr) _ F ..0 y� � I I I Q ix 51600 '—— I I I S.W. FIR 6 Stop ,.,, e� z000 2100 I I I I SEE MAP .. 125 .. .59At. 1.00 a. I I I I 1 I 2S 1 IDC 1400 .a6ac. 1500 - I \\ I I I i L.,) . ° .56Ac 1 I / 0 4 5 • w D"a ......"I ..qY.,.�> 373 I.• - Y'V NONTN LINE DAMES NCYLIY DLL.N •wYac OBE coY OP JYW Nia6.Y1 'Pia NI CM. a I.C.S I JAMB Y Et LG. u SEE MAP AGREEMENT TO DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AND CONDITIONS IN LIEU OF PROVIDING IMPACT STUDY WHEREAS, the undersigned warrant(s) that (l/weithey) are owner(s) of real property in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon as described: In EXHIBIT'A", attached hereto, and incorporated by reference herein WHEREAS, the undersigned wishes to develop the above descnbed property for without preparing an impact study to quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The preapplication conference established that the developer will transfer an interest in real property. The undersigned wish to develop the above referenced property in accordance with the preapplication conference. NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned agree(s) to the following: 1. That the value of the real property interests required to be transferred for the above referenced development are rougnly proportional to the impacts of the proposed development upon public facilities and systems. As such, the uncersigned hereby agrees to comply fully with real property requirements and public improvements and waives the right to pursue any legal challenge to those conditions. 2. This agreement is a binding contract between the City of Tigard and all persons who presently have an interest in the property or who acquire any interest in the property in the future. 3. This covenant shall run with the ;and, shall be recorded in the Washington County deed records and shall be binding on the undersigned and all successors in interest of any property affected by this development. 4. Should any portion of this agreement be declared void by a court of law, the remaining portions of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect Dated . 'Q Dated 1 o Signature of owner(s) City of Tigard STATE OF OREGON } ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON Personally appeared before me on the day of 19 who acknowledged that the foregoing was his voluntary act and deed. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: rhblimpway.agr City of Tigard Application Narrative for Site Development Review Farmers Insurance Property July 31, 1996 MEI Project Number 296044 prepared by: ?Mackenzie/Saito & Associates (MSA) Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated(MEI) 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 503/224-9570 F:1W2DATA\96-01\9604411;NARK I.SK MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND.OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9570 • FAX(503)228-1285 July 17, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Mr. Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Farmers Insurance Property Project Number 296044 Dear Will: Enclosed is an application package for Site Development review. This application package includes eighteen copies of each of the following: •Application Form ■Letter of Authorization 'Narrative •Vicinity Map •Existing Conditions Map ■Site Development Plan •Grading& Site Utility Plan •Tree Removal Plan •Landscape Plan •Exterior Elevations ■Exterior Elevations •Neighborhood Documentation ■Arborist's Letter ■Tree Removal Calculations •Pre-Application Conference Notes &Checklist •Lighting Cutsheets/Details •Traffic Report ■Miscellaneous Documentation The property is located just north of the existing Farmers Insurance building, straddling 68th Parkway. The total project acreage is 12.49 ac. The project proposes four office buildings,two on each side of 68th Parkway(north and south sides). Three of the four proposed buildings contain 50,000 SF;the fourth building contains 39,700 SF. Also attached is a check in the amount of$6,380 for the Site Development Review filing fee. It is our understanding that the application will be determined complete within ten days and a decision will be rendered approximately eight weeks after that determination. Please contact Tamio Fukuyama,Tim Echeverria, or me with any questions or concerns related to this application. Sincerely, Beth Zauner F:\W PDATA\96-08\96044\17L 1.EG .;,y. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CI OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. IDZ qCO Dd OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: ERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION North / adjacent to the (A) Application form (1) x :ing Farmer' s Ins. Building on 68th Parkway i (B) Owner's signature/written A7 MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2S1 1DA Tax Lots 300, 200, 400 authorization Of and 2200 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) ITE SIZE 12.49 ac (D) Assessor's map (1) R RTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Farmer's Ins. Group (E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) DDRESS 4680 Wilshire Blvd, 2nd F1P,HONE (F) Applicant's statement I: Los Angeles, CA ZIP 90010 (pre-app checklist) ?PLICANT* Gerding/Edlen Development (G) List of property owners and DI :SS 2525 SW 1st Ave, Ste. 201PHONE 299-6000 addresses within 250 feet (1) El: Portland, OR ZIP 97201 (H) Filing fee (t ) 41. 1 the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate !t .e, the applicant must be the purchaser of record a leasee a possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: the owner or an agent of the owner with written It crizatio^.. The owner(s) must sign this ,p—..cation in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: ib-4 t a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: _R0?OSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property equest site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: how an office complex. The proposed development includes (4) office buildings, Approval Da _e: ..otaling 190,000 SF with two buildings on Final Approval Date: ach side of 68th Parkway ?leaning 2 /,3P Eagiaee_ing 7 .. 5/87 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE AP PLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. It the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. ?ill of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 19 iIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. 1„oClp,Q. (10,...{.4.4-- -`D a-*—tZL itlei r" }C Co 2:A Mr. Mark Edlen, Gerding/Edlen Development KSL:pm/053;P) • 07/31/96 08:32 FAX 1 213 964 8094 0 002 iFARMERS v tINSURANCE) FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP OF COMPANIES /e FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE 4680 WILSHIRE BLVD TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE 2ND FLOOR MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY LOS ANGELES,CA 90010 FARMERS NEW WORLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PHI/: (213)932-3201 FAX: (213)964-8094 July 31 , 1996 City of Tigard ATTENTION: Mr. DeAndrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8199 RE: F.I.G. HOLDING COMPANY (FARMERS INSUR LNCE) PROPERTY AUTHORIZATION TO MAKE APPLICATION Dear Mr. DeAndrea: With reference to the above subject, this letter shall confirm ] 'armers Insurance Group's consent and approval for Gerding/Ellen Development Company to procee ( with the City of Tigard to make application for Site Development Review for an office compll x development. If you have any questions or need additional information, ple: se feel free to call me. Sincerely, • 6 i goo , Lawrence H. Gilmour Real Estate Manager LHG/pm M:linveittlnny1Itiga d AMERICA CAN DEPEND ON F IRMERS Propo sa // a rrct*ve City of Tigard Application Narrative for Site Development Review Farmers Insurance Property July 31, 1996 MEI Project Number 296044 prepared by: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates (MSA) Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 503/224-9570 F:\W P DATA\96-07196044\17NARR 1.SK CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. SITE DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA III. PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE CRITERIA IV. SUMMARY ATTACHMENTS: •Application Form •Letter of Authorization •Narrative •Vicinity Map •Existing Conditions Map •Site Development Plan •Grading& Site Utility Plan •Tree Removal Plan •Landscape Plan •Exterior Elevations •Exterior Elevations •Neighborhood Documentation •Arborist's Letter "'Tree Removal Calculations •Pre-Application Conference Notes & Checklist •Lighting Cutsheets/Details •Traffic Report •Miscellaneous Documentation F:1 W PDATA\96-07\96044\17NARR 1.S K I. INTRODUCTION This is an application for approval of a Site Development Review for an office development consisting of(4)office buildings. Three of the four buildings are similar in shape with two containing 50,000 sq. ft. and one at 39,000 sq. ft. The fourth building has a stepped footprint and contains 50,700 sq. ft. for a project total of 189,700 gross sq. ft. The site plan contains a total of 808 parking spaces. Parking lot lighting will be provided in the tree diamonds and various landscape islands. Additional lighting is provided throughout the site along pedestrian walkways, playas, and access points. Please refer to attached lighting cutsheets. The project is located adjacent to and immediately north of the existing Farmers Insurance building with 68th Parkway transecting the site. The total acreage of the project is 12.49 acres (6.88 acres to the south of 68th Parkway and 5.61 acres to the north). The project has been designed not to encroach into the ravine, wetland, and sensitive lands area between this project and the existing Farmers Insurance parking area to the south. A phasing plan is being proposed for this project. It is currently anticipated that the northern portion of the site (north side of 68th Parkway)will encompass Phases I and II. The 50,700 sq. ft. building and supportive site development is the first phase. Addition of a 39,000 sq. ft. building and completion of site development on this side of 68th Parkway is the second phase. Phases III and IV will be comprised of the area on the southern side of 68th Parkway. Both of these phases will include one of the 50,000 sq. ft. buildings and a relative portion of the site development. As indicated in the June 13, 1996 preapplication conference,this application will be processed as an administrative staff review. Neighborhood notification and a meeting are required for this proposal. The neighborhood meeting took place on July 17 at 6:30 p.m. at Tigard City Hall. There were no attendees at this meeting with the exception of MSA/MEI staff and the client. No meeting minutes were prepared. The following sections address the series of criteria required for the components of this application. F:\WPDATA\96-07\96044\l7NARRl.SK 1 II. SITE DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA The proposed development includes a complex of office buildings, as previously described. All Tigard Development Code standards are met by the proposal and specific development information is indicated on the accompanying drawings. Site Design Review approval standards cited in Section 18.120.180 of the Tigard Community Development Code are addressed as follows: 1. Provisions of the following chapters: a. 18.84, Sensitive Lands Response: The ravine (located at the south end of the site) separating this project from the existing Farmers' Insurance building, contains both steep slopes and wetland areas. As shown on the attached site plan,proposed development does not encroach into this area; therefore, this criteria does not apply. b. 18.94, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations Response: Not applicable. c. 18.92, Density Computation Response: Not applicable. d. 18.144, Accessory Use and Structures Response: Not applicable. e. 18.96, Additional Yard Area Requirements Response: The proposed buildings meet the required street frontage setbacks. f. 18.98, Building Height Limitations: Exceptions Response: The proposed office buildings will be approximately 32'-0" high. The C-P zone requires that no building exceed 45 in height. This criterion is met. g. 18.100, Landscaping and Screening Response: The accompanying landscape drawing indicates landscaping as required by Chapter 100,including screening and buffering of the parking area. All abutting zoning districts are commercial. Street trees are provided along both 66th and 68th Parkway. The trash enclosures proposed as part of this development will be enclosed and screened. h. 18.102, Visual Clearance Response: Visual clearance areas are provided as required by this section. Please see the accompanying plans. F:\WPDATA\96-07\96044\17NARRI.SK 2 i. 18.106, Off-Street Parking and Loading Response: Based on the requirements for an office use, the project will require 542 spaces (189,700 sq. ft.). The site plan proposes 808 spaces, including 518 standard,274 compact,and 16 handicap. The standard parking spaces are 9' x 18' or 9' x 16' with accommodation of a 2' bumper overhang. Compact spaces are 8' x 16'. A loading dock is proposed at the Phase I (50,700 sq. ft.) building. Service entries will be designated at the other buildings. j. 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation Response: Primary access to the development is provided through the access points off 68th Parkway. There are two access points on 68th Parkway for each of the north and south portions of the project. In addition, the southern portion has a single access off of 66th. The plan meets the dimensional requirements of Section 18.108.080. k. 18.114, Signs Response: Signage for this project has not yet been designed; therefore, in accordance with the application checklist provided at the pre-application meeting, sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. 1. 18.150, Tree Removal Response: 522 trees on the site have been determined to have a caliper of 12 inches or greater. Approximately 284 of these trees will be saved, providing a retainage of 50-75 percent of these trees (54.4%). Approximately 238 trees (12" or greater)will be removed. This will require mitigation for 50%, or 119 trees, 2,214 caliper inches. Please refer to the attached tree removal plan and letter prepared by Mr. Bill Owens, a certified arborist,for more detailed information. m. 18.164, Street and Utility Improvement Standards Response: The public street and utilities have already been constructed. Any future improvements will conform to the requirements of this section. 2. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment Response: Unstable soils,sensitive lands and potential wetlands have required the preservation of the natural ravine located on this site. Because the site is heavily treed, extensive efforts have been made to preserve as many of the trees as possible. The proposed site plan allows adequate distance between the buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting. Required grading will be minimal, and water detention and quality will be addressed on site. 3. Exterior Elevations Response: This standard applies to single-family and multiple-family structures and is not applicable to this application. F:IWPDATA196-07196044117NARRI.SK 3 4. Buffering, Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses Response: Surrounding uses in the development are zoned C-P. No buffer is required between the proposed development and the surrounding commercial uses except to screen parking areas,which has been addressed. 5. Privacy and Noise Response: Although the site is physically removed from I-5 and therefore retains a sense of privacy,noise levels from I-5 are still audible at the site. 6. Private Outdoor Area: Residential Use 7. Shared Outdoor Recreations Areas: Residential Use Response: This application is for the approval of an office development. These standards apply only to residential development. Therefore,these standards do not apply. 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. Response: The proposed development is not adjacent to nor within the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 9. Demarcation of Public, Semipublic, and Private Spaces: Crime Prevention Response: The distinction between public and private space is provided by signage and landscaping. 10. Crime Prevention and Safety Response: Although this section applies primarily to residential development, this project will provide adequate lighting and accessibility as envisioned by the criteria. 11. Access and Circulation Response: See Section 18.108.1.(j) as discussed above. 12. Public Transit Response: The closest transit stop to this site is on SW 68th Parkway at SW Hampton. The Bus is#78. 13. Parking Response: See Section 18.106.1.(i) discussion above. As indicated above, all parking and loading areas are designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sections 18.106.050 and .090; and Chapters 18.102 and 18.108. This standard is met. 14. Landscaping Response: See Section 18.100.1.(g) discussion above. F:\WPDATA196-07\96044\17NARRl.SK 4 15. Drainage Response: Drainage will be contained on the site and directed to an onsite water quality and detention pond. The pond will be sized to detain the difference between 50-year developed and undeveloped storm events. The water quality portion will be sized to treat the summer storm according to USA standards. 16. Provision for the Handicapped Response: All facilities (parking, access, restrooms etc) for the handicapped are designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 487. 17. Signs Response: Signage has not yet been designed for this project. As indicated above, all signs will be placed and constructed in accordance with Chapter 18.114. Sign drawings shall be submitted prior to obtaining a building permit to construct a sign. 18. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title. Response: All standards and provisions of the C-P zone are met with this proposed development. III. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE CRITERIA The pre-application conference notes also identify the following code sections as applicable to this project. a. 18.96 Special Setbacks Response: As cited in the preapplication notes, a setback of 30 ft. from the centerline of 68th Parkway is required. This setback has been accommodated in the site plan. b. 19.98.020 Special Building Height Provisions Response: The proposed buildings conform to the restrictions of the zone. Therefore,these special provisions will not be needed. c. 18.106.020 Parking and Access Response: Please refer to Section 1(i) and (j) above. d. 18.108.050 Walkway Requirements Response: Sidewalks are proposed on the east and north sides of 68th Parkway. Additional walkways are proposed connecting the individual buildings to each other and associated parking areas. e. 18.106.070-090 Loading Area Requirements F:\WPDATA\96-07\96044\17NARRI.SK 5 Response: A loading dock has been provided for the 50,700 sq. ft. building. Service entries will be provided at each of the three remaining buildings. Please refer to the site plans. f. 18.102 Clear Vision Area Response: This code restriction has been accommodated within the site plan and landscape plan. g. 18.100, 18.016, and 10.108 Landscaping Response: Please refer to attached landscape plan which addresses all related screening, parking lot,street tree, and percent placement of landscape. This plan substantially exceeds 20% landscape on the site. h. 18.150.025 Tree Removal - Response: Please refer to the attached letter and tree removal plan which illustrate compliance with the code. 18.32 Narrative 1. 18.100 Landscape Response: Please refer to (g) in this section. 2. 18.106 Parking Response: Please refer to section 1(i). 3. 18.108 Access,Egress, Circulation Response: Please refer to section 1(j). 4. 18.116 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage in New Multi-unit Residential and Non-Residential Buildings Response: This development will include space for mixed solid waste and recyclables within the trash enclosure. As discussed with Mr. Lenny Ling with Pride Disposal (see attached Record of Telephone Conversation), two garbage/recycling areas are located on the plan. Each will be 20 ft.wide by 10 ft. deep to accommodate front-end loading. 5. 18.120 Site Development Review Response: Please refer to the above discussion, 1.(a)-(m) and 2-18. 6. 18.150 Tree Removal Response: Please refer to Section 1(i.). 7. 18.164 Street and Utility Improvements Standards Response: Please refer to section 1(m). Also, as noted in the preapplication notes prepared by the engineering section, a traffic report has been completed for this project and is included in this submittal. F:\WPDATA\96-07\96044\17NARRI.SK 6 IV. SUMMARY The proposed office development meets all applicable standard of the Tigard Development Code for the C-P zone. Site Design Review approval should be granted for this proposal based on this compliance. F:\WPDATA\96-07\96044\17NARRI.SK 7 \ p a f,osr O ail E' uRSr ELMNURST _ . 13 oa • c., INJRM �, AY 4- y�i SW HERM0S0 '°°° N- `" CT o o WY SW ••N4 IN a ra R nGP�EN ST l SW W SUN EE lAl, t \ X200 ST f_ 1,_ SW SOOT 00 4```�I EEU w - ` a 6 �; P i t x \ _ o DR v �vN+ cD GRAND OAKS 5C W .Z SW GONZAGA • ,o M N I_cam °.• _:-- =•cR 11 — N co f !*-::, J w. ,~ Q ^ SW RAMP ON N ST y 3 3 2 - 1..., � SUNOROOK ,9Rm j t v nu) T 'Q• 1N 3 . / u OR t Fsg u ' j g I Ippr ST kii 1 3flail SW N S „ MEAOOMCREFI<T . _ �Q v] J N _<�cn H S poiE • mum-R + :.ta_ 2 E tt w ,nix �,~ ------ i-S K `-1- ,` FARK ST 1 l CRESTYIE1i pan" 1 NOTTING 2 BARRiNGTDIir - " 3"f- oR SW Q1 VAMS kiNk� pX I" 4'r . ;; ..-�(LR 2'YESTUK PAA, 7200 � / iR(/s �.T` `• ` ^C-'' .9 - a F '� �:_`c., crib W�. SW FIR S� -P ,�, � oa • ^ : ti� .•- .:, . c-)\ ,.)4. -a ST 8 .1217sNif:„C' N \t„ N ., SW \ .• l„` --ET - _av ��Eol G �_ !\ o m GR m LN �'� SW CHERRY DR en ANDB ' I �a y�' NoLrd�r alA �"NSB /' �+ ° cam*` p,aowE p PADRRV W -, ' �� ST BERT I •��c� SW TECH CEtdTER _ j- � � cy��� `�' ,,.\\�P� DR L tk J s. K`5E--�_ I� .--I i 4 RES�DE - '. V- 'I�.,. •K � . iO INN l fo I LN g , —t�ElTOQ1r1 1 . �3 O ■ I, 2 U" su t SW BONITA'� J BONITA ) , \r RD / S Czr RD > >to 1\ 7000 f _ 6000 NE NDFIELD 5000 �v z MAR \ �' �., p cT < a 1----IV: T " � LANGF�D LN 4„.. �' .-4 a a �, -- . o sw (L 4� < to BN- I N PARTRIDGE a WYE S K 4 t.,,,, •ARKHIII r. / DR �i CT CTii 0.C` 0.'- — 2 s 2 �- .. ' SW B ' .10'1 RD I,:\ G0.0. `0,45 �1 = V1 aC N ( 0 r„�vrt nr�nr nn , , /'-- \' if ci l -4 I "t" 4-'1 N-A i4 , r..t rs . , FA Ed``` 'l k .....A 1.,,,,....a----..., 1.___ r__ 4„71... r,...„ i... .....1-- 4.7.-- di -, Al-t-c�}---11--1 1-3-1— - I �©rte --.}' Cf) Z 0 I-- 0 Z 0 0 U) X 076..,; > < _c . 1 1 • 1\ \ .1..i- 21V,Iin a '1 I _- .0 vi --- -- - Ho I oo - iiT I , I ( VACATED ) ,........... ... . 7. .. 027. 0arr-- - .7 •" _ ,.... -- ----_----_r..17.:--t...-7;:_- -_ _":77:_%_77:4":"7.1. .._11:;15-_••`•*_'. _ ._.7__.._._.. .._. ,......4 .•••■••••• ••••7'- 0 1. . hi:. . - CV.W (AM:.- 'I‘,e(").' , .tr"t; ...* . ; I • - 0 _.,' ( 7,- ia r"r tri w li ....r 1 . •••.0 - , ,er„, et,.......i. 4..,,,,. , ...r./ou--4--9..:!"__%-.w **0.... 9.7. . I 1 6' ' II Nen .. ------r, ii-614-1..- 0-.Q.9:1 ....Twos,. ',0, tr,...0 , 11 - ...,,,, ek c.a..... .1.,„.1 r (J.'''.17 ).•'1. ix' Q..*r 0!...r eirwr.-• i-.nazi" "•ft w .. ,,,......0.. )••••• •. 0 /$r"WO We•.I""""1 r•eet.": • •1 We e. ,U.e(1,X.1:1■14 ) ( e.• /OM... ... 0 enee. ,4,,,,„; 1)...••••W "W (Mose,/ 'Mee' .,,,, 1 , ..,..,,,• 1...W. e; 0,41 7r.44:W 0 PO.1P W L r 1411 IMH44.3 . Tr:4471)(1144 4 NV W I I t. O.. ...TO ' r or..• (p.a.,. rip, m ( W 14. •.....,••■. •• .............„4321111110 .1 (IS• I 8 I 7 , ..., ,.,..„„,... - „.., (,..... .....-\. 1 ...,,,,,; 3: , ' ,I,,,Sr... 1., w ,...... . ,r-ww. ,,,..... . (www . 4 a w ""Iii. -,ro , i..., „ w . '''''''`'17.7.rw,.. . ,..),..„;, ,.. t 7`'w 0.7 7.ar; ,r T-ir 413 I ,rw 1 ' • . ,. , ,,,ww " LP. U." ' .,11,(.6 sr fr '1 li 11 0,..._._ 0...r , -Ow.r 0..re ‘..,...is, r I Ow.w n)a 4.1. ' ,,c,.., 1.r=lir .1s,II...4 :._a, a s ----440 eltrt r r cl,„„, ow,wo;-:..,,.‘,.W. wc a r....TA,,, 9.... ,...,•.. (5.•r w. '''. 0...• woir 9.,w4' ,,, 0...7„.,, . I %REA( 73 SQ. FT. ...105, _!!.. t.)....t.5•....."r '''' cy.•w ( e•Tir 15.... ". `./ (..1.r 0..... u 0....v 0..13.., am...r Owqr ; : '.6:141*` *; er wo 7..' 0.r•-ft ,,.) : w.rcirs IA it: 0 ow ..ww .... .•li• t•W ..,.." • r., . • • rt. . 3...•0.. ..d 4,4, ,'1 r• w rdet.1.0 r lc...,° . . ;0 w." VOZZ 7 e714 •‘ •.•,', '.. .. • ,.. 8:: ext.- •i41.-i, , % .01 alt. os.w alw".w 6°.'...: • . i 14 I 0 W me...• . Q" ! 1.•:.It'W5. * MP..• •••/0 157.:=5P.0 IOW-...We OS 0.GO MO le" (1).•V ye •tr: .9W...• I • • a"W , 1 . °I.C.W"). °"" •°--in ni 1 . > s 1/.---- c7,pv?..,-- -wt5..,,iv, - J'n-r ,,as tr.. ... .dr WO......... w ykr ES7Ive... el, • •. w w • t w w ),Ir, ::4:4;,,,F;""" ___.7" ..,, wd,..0.. ... w. c ' 0 M. w...1-' .•\ W 0 ,.. j: , ••• -1-5- ri.)w.w 0 A.9 , I Ow. -ar9. r :;- , W.,0 r Itr C) (.),..... .,lo: . § ? *ea.w Or".( C)."". 0_v ....,cr.-11X: •bw.15 , 0,..... 1 s,, o......w ,„„.0 - cr''' iri: --) ..6-->-.' .We" • . ., ,,,-..... 0......4 wr.4. I, I .P." ....r kr NO MI ...,..; II 11 ,1* . C)voso of 0...".cer"a. .OD :WI: • ...- 7 7.1. ....N,, 0.. oe i (bItsww ...so g....- e " I I I* re er-... .. , 0...;, IT 0:0 , W0 sr ...... • (""--"---w o< rif4iin rS'1.: , 0 2..._..._ ___ ________.. .,.. ,..... ... .... 1 , ._.........„ W e" Ma. 1141111•eir" \\)- ( • ''.."I'M w '1,44,,,, ' ,. Ow. ‘P4k, 0 w`w 0..8-leiwor . cE.fr.,...w •-"--t--- river- ( es...w ,-.,7 ..crp.r- :. .--''''''- '.....'..'.... -11/1-9- ( w tew "...it ..,..1.1 P.I .... (1."."1": ..9g.Jiirit:F•timtrrer• a t I t.)w.w 1 ;:‘1\1), j- 11 se.. ....w (ww. 4.w - '-- (,.....:.. likti 4 i .-°- • ' 7,:irmix. L ,•... .. "• • 15.0. (),...70.ref..(:...r..•••, .(..)ow or- - ... . Tr."' w .. 0 (186\ r .., ..ei •b,c• 111.)..:r .". nver ...„ \ ..,,No...,,--.....„,. -.... Ea.: •„.....„.„..ww.el --.........:z.„... 0 - ,---.." ses'z•, ,t,, . ,,,.,w. , ........,----- • , , , ..,40 ''''b. 'Atak., -- "----7"...........411% , olw"wir *""." rei: .. • ' +...........z.,,_ ':4111 jP,4',..z """......,........._w-`e-------._ w 7 ', ,...,, . ... 0 .."0••, 8:_27e •?:,Serein% I re c.i.U-rrwcf4.41' gj 7 won,' 40,■ f 111 VW. 4 . eoP/0,-,.:3:,,-.1;:87. i.41, ., ._,.t a:n,t,s1) 0......, ..______r•_.....:;., , :...z .... ,...7___,,,„ _. ____.„,. vv.Nth PARKpAY ..... tilligliglir13:71::"..Liol ::'i : !PI.1°.1111.74;1 l i ..._,z„.......,,- .... kii 4 •,,-04 a ttk.;\) A.' ;i:...... .. ,..ci •-•--------= -,-... ; - __,.... --77:=------ -5-:-',-:-.4 ,,--7-7-7-71`L-", 4 1 0.. rat ,:.-„:„---,-.„- ,_ - -r,-------, 0-le ni litgc..C...A) .-. 7 r . i----- - ------ -- - - - - - - - --, ,,, 'SANI I'm{' "SE MIL' k...ors,,,,,-.....2.-0 r■M P 4,,,;.,13.00K i-125 -AGE 4 9..5 77 egl."''' 'Wig.Mall . -1 JAR' PR AIN ' t, I PER BOOK ., \\•tb, (..)••••""`. ...wa' I ■ 3 ( : 493 *,.... let......„..., f . 1 iLts, •■,, ,--, ,7 ,oiii .9 •-w .......„/.- 0.0W tt 1 ww . _WEi■L. t li4 wA f . ,,,,•ddit tr.*/ar.....'......-.7i;r7 ti' ...---- . .. 50...-UM 11 Y L ASI.• l■ - r- -----_-- --- .4. - lailffiliMegilr&1111 41,i v.• ., A t...or ow• ' ‘ 111.kilk w vaa..*Iiir Pr I? I.300K 1 00/,.PACE 175 ---4"'le,---- --- ::::----- . . 4, ,,____.--.-i WN, ,i■11A-,:,W.N., . ‘711,:.t.:,r. '''''j. ____.,,, .. . • • *.,.. ,f 1 1 ... I, w.:,,,„--9110 *,..„. * - ... s, tr.:ill t■11,,k , 1 ., ,, N, .. , f. I • .--- ... - At4Pair r*4',k11. ,ii ..... . . - ,-- Zr. i 1 .' I 1 I 1 . /i .,., ,„t,- ibt, i 11, iii‘e-.*......• .., , or i . 6 g..v WETLANDS A A = 8 SO. FT i".1... .....7."7/51/. a i•vr ..--..... i . . e I i I \ 2.7 . \ * . ••or .,•. FT ‘ fil*,(\\l'*ik ■,:t1-\,..."*":...„L "%,,!.,"---- att‘wwo....0.:w _iv._--______:' LANA gaitrak---.-7._-*10 ........ 11 ! \,.VA\6, ,.1.1:kte6h,"!,%,...:ir. .%7:4•rwm". ,._00.00:::-..r2:7:_lOtroma_.0"," :::...1..-1::::.........,....-:::',....17::):.....A. , .a. ww. e .." il ‘ . 4*. 4.-: '■._ Iv oi4Cfr. .7; ----OM's-:-..- 0:--12.‘ ,s.,T i'71'.---------- . In ! el,. 1 I , i . \ ''' 1 •--.4.:x°-_241,..--.J„ ...--'4 4'■'‘'.11,,,.. -:C. 'w •tk - .•:)X-(. di .. Ift rr -0...-wd- • ,... ,:.,.,- vr....-\4,-7- :. :.....s. r ... ... ern ----.........,..._ 1 ..)„ ,ik ,,,...,-...._ .. 4...w -'""' ••••.:_ •.:7-oodw:r Jaii W Qui"1.7 cw:".... ..... tr..' „--- •wom w . Liii ..... CEFONWECUEN \__:..../.....„...../...z'b 2 .' 2 74 Solo 20, Rem..OropER 17101 .....(303)21111-11000 flUI.(=Mt-IMO . . ■• 11■■ on rNo iin ti■ ■•■■•,..• I IR MR I R St H s.... a. . . COM3TRJCTION CO A .130 sy T.*.St Rwoors.Crow.97205 R.a.s (303)2211-7"? f:\ SITE DA TA 1 ro,x (5.13)224-3431 .... rili .• TOTAL SITE AREA 12.49 AC. \\A . SOUTH Of 68TH= 6.88 AC. NORTH OF 681H= 5.51 AC. \\C \ TOTAL CROSS BLOC SF. m 189,700' PARKING REO'D .-. 542 PARKING PROVIDED 1 I 16 DISABLED < . 274 COMPACT 313 STANDAR() > I BOB TOTAL > —1 m 7 - . . .... , MACKENTIE/SAITO ,,, and ASSOC.P C _....7- 09 _.___________„..77 • , 01190 S w Gowen Street •0 So.1110.39 Rtel.erw.Oreg.1720,0131 •,•■Ic(03)22.-30 e, f•r..(50.31228-'28.1 ill ( :WCCeellwri.:4):Em°1a.t":I°2"18:"Ell.37;1,-726517"°1-: 0.,............ 4114.4.7 SW.eft PARKWAY ass°s• Bowen Wool ICEIRRui .' .. . 1.o.lnease...tint 1%1111146 . Th11 J . Alf —at (---........, • 7 ) RRewe(503)2211-3,22 Anpanill IILLIMI L.OMR / ..--J I 1 _ L b. —J- sr .410.3 ,47 1 AMOCLATB6 or 4 / . ....-- / . r.":CCMULWern-42::°1"."...1:4:700.;:l:triL":"'')2•21:Na"C°77 ' .. . ra••■■Cr I_ . .,;---"--,/ -- i , / 1 ■ / *Or Ps....Crow REEO• ••.....c(50.3)228-3122 2-8TORY geree.MCiA3 _L i REO..ECT F--1 MOW I C ) t I ..... ....W...... 1__J I FARMERS 02 lili r-- 1 pi - isii. INSURANCE II: 7 PROPERTY iii! s•:...1 —I j c.•...n:No....:•MSOCI•lf..C. :...71.....,...S.V., I -t ••CIWAIX/%61••ISCCARS...0 L-11— ). .,k mr•u•••A...[V,RCO 1--... -• ... d , r-11 I I t 111 it! .111■•• ■ ------ r ) • RE 1 ..0.0SINE 2. •'. \ ...)---=u"1-11-- . :77.----1-17--------.---' fl . NM EN r I I 2-STORY NM 4 . .—■—.I I 1 / I A . . I _,_______ . I — 2-8TCfrceece . 2-gfORY • _. 090..BA.Gtaszcia: NM !I MN • 1111.7011W ....• a it is MOB IP 237...ELQED . , ......, VS -L. ....... • .1 ELLIVE NM •••4 • r ..".."-■ IWO 1117 ----7 1..1--. 9470112 • . * SITE PLAN — 1 . - _ . . . _ - - - . II - . v. , . . ii . ,. - _ . ' - aa.er JAM --. - 0E040 Or . PITIMSTME 3(I-6) "(CT 1 Or 7 .C."a 296044 0 Q_ ,� Z e} I 4 z • «�0 8 • s° k tXo d �� F. )y, 0 O :R,X �ja_ a°« p^ (n U N 'a In = m °'i',° }° D S w`' Ow 'i I,rq'u;Ja Z— Id N I 18! 1!fi s €«° fi� fir W Q W r•,;,, SQaP^« ZT J BF eg = 2 Y�Jis 1'ir �J .2 �m eRR 8 :8• Fmb9, ; . 5 . g a—Z j 'g JiJ! 1 6 k ;73 95'al: i .1t I g.20€ Ig <Li_ z cc ..'rg" ,4 a 0 a. o s X I i IRVING ST, -1 I ( VACATED ) __ _ _ _ . ° U - - ' -•;•.;•;;•-",;• F"_ 0 w. .---- - ' • - o - _ e - - - - - —v_ .; — T O d U I >p o' p p 1' I I O p �0 O W u p p I � Ii�' `__ -_._g "•;-- :: p o / ( U o,'. <o O 7o O U o O ;fi U O II 0 O o O O O po (00\ pU� � C0 p 1$ , ee I Co a p I i)'i 5; J c s i ----- 1 I I I •ry) . •. . �( J c C � p +.4 I ) O C7 • qJ 0 n p O O ,) U y n 1 1 i I i • ,O C,U ) C(.')O p ~�\ ) • q U o O U� O C) �Cq ::.i( O p O UO „`.Y o C' L. �; ( 0 0 0 ,� `r ID 1! ' 1 S i, () O () '{) • ~ p•�) C ory ..I N1 .L rfR7 C. ) �� i ` O. s► 1- np ) . . ,) " )N.7' .' a i ti' t )\ Al w 1 I (r u I IL- n , O 111,`, ,• r) CO t)or' o �1 : 1i_,t r • ( cb oe p Q.) 1 o o •0 1 \ I p � )1 d p Pr O hJ 1� r�_ - o O : � . O II. p n �"_ '. 8 ff._ ' u ori.1 ' 1 � �•10 .\ ', / ,...... . blrir ,,,,, 0°o c()., - 00 1 kg . " evo „.. , - 'rillilliaMNIIIIMILIMNIVAL 7; : . it A..4 • .. , ''',\ ..-wr -. Allhiimirr....milal - , vs....• • r . .4 . (-1 , ,;, littto\ \ i .4- ' ....■• - '4' fc At\\ \ , ., r r ; ^ 1 r:; ` ''1 X11 �. i\./ ili ji \t . , I'' '', -.1 ,a‘ ,'N I :4 \ * it, 0 ti '''\ ,\)\si.4, .. .,,. ,...3.„ \ \ .\ , ...::11,:n,,1 Milt I)tt ' . .- ' \ \'.'s\ a r1 t, II� • 5 �TjIi V =\ \ v. �� �� c' - r ' 1•. . .* g c) (4,‘ ,(\ ���� ,i , i -----5‘. 111,,),*-\\, ,•lil., .......1....b,•,. .. ... ........_,11-1,111,„mok \ N. v,,• • �� �v\ � �\\:, • .,.,..iir,,,;‘1111'I\ '' -"-- zt . * .104 ke :, ' ..s. ,,b1...1,....-___-:,-_--*------:- _--1.----. _--...._-_-_-- .' non■-w_ .1.1•4;4; IIIII1 -- --,-,----- . ,.. x , /, / \. l w b__ � X3� . C7 \. 3t1/ 1 r n-- H r d e ,l'; �, \\......„, \ -0‘ 8 \ ..., . 1,ui __\,\:„...„.\\4,i.„..\\ il . .J\.. 7, iy „/„, ...c..\4 \s, . \ (\ - 1 / / f•,lfr••1'11■10 , »xga a R . 8 ,. W %� �e Q 1 a 8 "s :6 s J E l ,. rim d= gill. ! 1+ 2 tin,: � '" iiI !• 6& :ti ; 1 b ;:o to y x d I,� Z a _ e"' f §'sti !L-'_`_."i ■ ■■■■■■■ F m R N R 4 ! i !1 @ ,R 4 ij,. : .. ■■ ■■■■■■■ ' wwa ,• I� a 4. . s cVo s t t U_ at r7o X X"i ▪ .4 s a:t S t a !t mg I,Xfi9 rri 4'" j iii Yg R Pri4441 45 Ole X31{ ij IRWNG ST- LL L ( VACATED ) I- I • ili, II 1 w- �..c+. • -. ▪ u CM• C)°r(�w " __ -- zis,,w,.-.91 �r�r X15 fie•.- 11 Orr Orr O•L•'r 9... rfi P C. _'=Q�i'•l7' e rg ."C7 O+r �3"y• 1�i�r . I C r(}vr O•• m ^/ +r O^, .'.C7 r w .f or.r,/+ - wr �• , j2 rC�O 7iYL--'•►•i'V, 1 I I ccr rwr ' __./ , y e r.. )rr Q'r , .rr . .," rP_r .j,-r� � •hr t J- • �rw r �/r 77 +CMU. OS r ('r.+w •Y �'r �r f)i I lC" e C r ^wIJ. . all". 1 nwrr rrrr'Oi t':i .:6. rr�r r0'.On'r J"r I I Drb.'••.ar • ?".0.•,...'" 45 -r rf1'��r+ ^ b. 3 r + • CJrr w0 �, . } -- r)I-^(. ' I O.•rr !' C)+rw0 �orlrirr ".r() -f 6.... ✓ \ /� O-mo wr►r�r":0(.' � �^ COQ+ • • r I,1 r r• i.>•'r JJ r y'+ \ O r � rtw • .•r(Y.rr I.f t.r o.•rrw Orrr O 'I C war firli.j '• -\ - r w • ..- - !Y/T J'w( 1 + 11 ww r YY ,.(y7� \��. w rrw ^lY _C, o^ • i �. • O r CJr•..rw .1%. i r '/.I: :1`+ () 4•(1• "' r)r r (J^r •'rl"trr ,� ' (Lr I 1 ( rJ^• Or 6:11. Wr l)'."ri•� . '•' __/ r( it C)r4�.rr l Mier •(' ± t: ;r \ • 1•^ •n a r. I C r• •\ dry r (,7..w '�f_, 'K'�` .r1•• -'15r7r i's; �j-;, J IS rI Gt • l` '1 st\\r.M " \l'() 'yr r ..ir' �) • / rrrd,._ -1g,!W.;tr -: '7r• 'r• ` � .L/}� Jr�rr �.. r ..J.I^ `.7,S.r: r dJ _; ly.r{M.1 A•r r.. rr I .. \\ '\\ r.r,.rr w 'ti''• # r.. i7.+. <)rr.r Cr^ t.R iY w w ➢ N \ � f r �r•r Jul p+•fir' ..A r• r - 7::\ r \\ . .i!• i • • ,.......:„...,,,,e4,1. lb. ___ ter o '� w� l 1I\\ / •.'.R) a 0.71._. 5••-. i �J CSl.r...�.).�r• O 4J i.r� O r' a d 'I. 'r Orr () ^ 61SYV..:..t... . 1. \--:-'1' . .' ` w , .k.... , 0••"'L.... °." I - ' (An, '' , I • 0 i� Q'/ �.� O^ + T�(±�SLR, Cftr.i'•s., ....4::: ll . ii 0'r r 1 \ (7 r , •` r lyiilw. r ' _� qr.i -- '��� �M. PARCMAY _ , •,,,� I1 x. ...7, 1-..- (r-— •''''''4. li A fj s� , ,r-r'1 J ill t" 14.CI NEj22 �.'. \ /... - i••\ rr■‘ t\ 1 4 ''.?'g^ ' . 4:- .'t o' ( .. Ced-4". .P4S'I"\ `', \ - g 8w 5 ..-Z *•• - • . ' , .0.....0±." , 4 .ta 4 , . \ \i. ...\\,s, 1)IU.J w it ..wr 11 1 -�`_ \\ � 1 �•. •w :g, /ice: x w,r " f 1•\\ r � _ ' `_ �_ T _._ _ • a ___ Vi I \\ ` , ! `` x•.•.rl l).... " .r q.:.• 1( --,..v.=:- • r / �w•ur+ ,"-41..,M ).......(./....,,,,. y 1 l • (;) \ I , ., . 2„,...r. C>•r r - (.7:.. .rs+ i \f, C. '• + r .r if j < db 1 • w.w rte+ \�\ '"• r 1 O� )i t. ilik g 1 .ttlk.) _..goot r)--' I t C s + c, 0 \ III\ -......... ----N. zi4,.,,,: . r I�.• z V \.... (\* • • A FEASPeir 5 - Z. rt.A51r Lai aza s.rrn er..w �.: rwl.Tor :_. • • •/ •.rMr r e..r 1....... ...Mot 0r.•.97]01 y • Ills 1•T/NEr TM• Pe..w(50.1)x9f-s990 A�e..M A.m. •..r w 1.rtr r u/••• FAX (!0]7x9•-970! '�.6 r r..0 0444✓ l.r.e0.1... r u/11 11 • • i • • 1 , - ".eat..•Ww.r Awry Crn•••• r Ca/•11 _ • - -- O VV Fri...r Wane wr wr........were r r0./••• R k M •. .. ...• 10.1=1 11wwMM Ts 1 r. a r.�.. O rarnuc`noN CO. I..r..w r.rr�.ar C.y..q .../•11• 1110 Sr. .SL r►e rr. were 11.e ce.r ar.lr/•11• W11N,65911.97x0! t�MAW r0.• Plwrr lsa7)x16-)177 we..1.11. 0..l.•.1r. r Ca/11 a• rAl(7W)73e-]6]6 me Amer err 1...•...W . .n.r Ica/•116 44�� 'r` ••Q0. ruii Ar�yqN(Cp 6E�a.1.a T 0 2525 55.F5.41 Awned Q sn.�o, 17. /- . 6 ` .50.92^9770, t- � o,�mc(501)799-6000 -/ -- _ ^— rLL (503)199-6)01 r • — 1 — - 1- R&M I 1110 zT Toyer T10N CO. r e.e. 03(00 9)X15 — 5.(501)334_3636 N. • +a('°_o) µ I - Li -WEST BUILDING ELEVATION O EAST BUILDING ELEVATION e n o Li I I MACKENZE/3AITO and AMC,P.C. 0690 S r °0.0931 Street 5 0.Be.69039 e•..Oge•17701-0039 Ph... (5011225-9570 FAA(563)226-1295 0../S,.clw+Ggw.e 71.f.103601E 06C K 0690 S.►.3250231 5Vwt 0 P 0 6e.69039 0 Awl.,Orgy 97701-0039 T/Mg1L l / / 700(303)229-3299 6 NALCO/AACT I I I frr// �, (5:D RP I ue'= 03 1 PP&ll .Ore,.97205 r.(503)279-3,12 ) I I • I 4u>w L 04191 w AOICQAT® •0.Be.543 p 04...Oregon 97107 P :(503)222-7007 - r - MN— ~ Ta — ^' - I fll �� r s...3. 11Qf1d10?k COMI LTANM IC. L [ • 661 s.w.IA%111- S*.100 Pe6.a 0 9720. /N em m(501)13)2 19-3127 OSOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION ACE. °"_1_o• FARMERS —1-1—_, INSURANCE PROPERTY ®..c..z..m a■mo,.a6.c 19.....9 rt 3•.4515_e w9.an.1 •..2.ax w+E.g,v ft..2.ano- 5W6..9......•1.011•90, ATM.+1Pr990. 9(M-.0 1 a O;r:art . +I/..,L 32-0' U. MN ME 1 I U.•- - U. I 1 I, I I ii ■■ • r - � SKEt nnt: - BUILDING ING A 1 — I i _ 1 I — � I t ∎ ELEVATIONS sr(.o'-01 _--__ e NORTT-I BULDING ELEVATION KEYNOTE I.P.161t9 CC.CDELE 2.L.F.S.0704 S,•7005 6 (705. CLASS c1.ti 059A 0[r.a srws OP 1c. 07-31-96 5 PANEL ANNE I is ZEIt cD+- au.an LTM/ma0 04013D 9r Tr/PPA 97007 6 0r 7 " i° 296044 Vt096Z L• L 0334 Vdd/1i+.o31o3w anm/no :u taws 96-1t-LO 7190 (M9'iinis SHOIIYA313 �- QNY a:ssa18) SNOILYA313 ONIGllfl8 :3116 1334 4.5 1Xorkl ULAN Wed 0040•■••aft 0040 -dam ad axn am 11 ur1.161 00 i+Ewa asa 0.101011 LIMY.n"My. 704.545.•01.4/10544414• £1kI3dOEid 3ONVdf1SNI Sl13r vd 3070 • LLI[-9LL((9i)a* sous••4.0 1.944 903 41145 m•sat LLI illIfrINICO • LOOt-LZZ(C04) 9wyd 10501.4.0'V.M•d 9•q1 0 d IELVCCort 99901)M r LZ 1g-9uu(Eo) a•W yogis••440 Aa1•d O0z•I!•5 d•10x0 6i 1 U'al(rf1vr 1••1!.4•a1.0.•1 5911-91Z(COS) 401 0946-nz(r0s1 •.•41 9000-10015•4440 9441.d SC069 11143 0-d I••.IS 11m4•9 aS 0490 1 COGEENEM3 3:561:7M4 ■•••••r3 0 01..1 SA, 4911-S00(r00) 441 0L011-53(ra) 11[09-I06••4.O•011042-1006 5[069•09 00 1••05 1190.110 .5 0690 'a'd-30SEV PUS auvs/3Da OVVI 9C9C-450003) 0101 LLIL-9Lt(COS) 91OW COILS.6.0 9..1141 1s•4•1 YS 0[41 3 HAtl 0049-691(00s)440 0009-442(COS) 91-454 IOZLS 1•^440 1•144 IOt•1105 4•4510 nL MS CZSZ 0.00 553336 153.36 '9 14104 131105 5 9011S 1111311 6390'S'.11.3 4 SLY10 03141 031101004.1 T 10010 S'1'13 L 31360103 0314104 '1 S31ONA )l NOLLVA313 ONI(Tf18 1SV3 ' 0-1.-9/I NOLLVA313 ONIa1Il8183M 1 ) 11110 y — - - r 7-1 +u 4L O ( 0 I I 0-1.-9/I NOLLVA313 ONIa1Il8183M d AU NOLLVA313 ONIC1If18 HI ION a : ] ) 11110 I r 7-1 +u 4L O ( 0 I I d AU NOLLVA313 ONIC1If18 HI ION a : ] NOLLVA313 ONIOIl8 HIllOS LO-.0.)u+ TV (.0-Ad)14 31-0-.zi .1/1* I ( NOLLVA313 ONIOIl8 HIllOS LO-.0.)u+ TV (.0-Ad)14 31-0-.zi .1/1* Craig Hopkins 7430 S.W. Varns Street Tigard, OR 97223 Mark F. Mahon 11310 S.W. 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Joel Stevens 9660 S.W. Ventura Court Tigard, OR 97223 Pat Wyden 8122 S.W. Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Pacific Realty Associates, L.P. 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, Suite 200-WM Portland, OR 97224 Oregon Department of Transportation 417 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97310 June 28, 1996 Re: Farmers Insurance Property MSA Project Number 296044 Dear Interested Party: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates (MSA) is representing the owner of the property, located to the north of the existing Farmers Insurance building, off of S.W. 68th Parkway, Tax Map 2S1 1DA, Tax Lot Nos. 400, 300, 200, and 100. We are considering proposing an office complex for site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, July 17, 1996, at 6:30 p.m. The City of Tigard City Hall - Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 224-9570, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Beth Zauner Planner BZ/kc F:\WPDATA96-06196044\28LTRS.KCM • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS Ai rwAVTT TO: • City of Tigard - • • • • ». r:.. Pla fining Division y . •• • ' 13I25 SW Hall Boulevard ' • • • Tigard.OR 97223 I, Beth Zauner , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed office development affecting the land !coated at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 68th Parkway, Tax Map 251 1DA, Tax lot 100-400 , and did on the 29th day of June 19 96 personally past notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Si to Development Review application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at the corner of 68th Parkway and SW 66th Avenue (state location you pasted notice on property) / / Sig -tu (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZE) Subscribed and swomlairmed before me on the 3 day of !'= OFFICIAL SEAL - n+ 1 GERALDENE E. MOYLE �-t`V NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.037876 'NARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 15,1998 My Commission Expires: • Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed projec-) .0.1 OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA:MLE: - TY-PE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 1 Name ofApplica.adOwner. . ddress or C-enera1 Iacitian of Subject P_•ope_^.�. LSubjec:P:noe_—.v_ Tam Map(s) and L. c�(s): J ks •;.7Lyra=as'.exst.= (T AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Beth Zauner being duly sworn, depose and say that on June 28 , 19 96 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) for the property to the north of the existing Farmers Insurance building on both sides of 68th Parkway a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. i further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Johns Landing with postage prepaid thereon. • #nature (In the presence of a Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE!NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 day of 1 , 19 OFFICIAL SEAL n to � GERALDENE E.MOYLE / / \r NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON / `"'f COMMISSION NO.037876 'OTARY PUBLIC OF 0 EG•N MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 15.1998 My Commission Expires: ,plica at. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed projec_) .if1E OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: me of Applican:Owne_: ezess or C-eaeral Locadoa of Subject P:aperty Ic..bjec:Property Ta_z Map(s)aad Lac=r(s): i fi:knnkara ferusters=frrtaiLr..st MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET•P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039•(503)224-9570•FAX(503)228-1285 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 18, 1996 SUBJECT: Insurance Property/Neighborhood Meeting Project#296044 BY: Beth Zauner W PRESENT: Rick Saito/Tamio Fukuyama-Mackenzie/Saito&Associates(MSA) Tim Echeverria/Beth Zauner- Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated(MEI) Mark Edlen-Gerding/Edlen A neighborhood meeting was held on Wednesday,July 17, 1996,at 6:30 PM at the City Hall,City of Tigard. Present at this meeting as applicant representatives were: Mr. Rick Saito,Mr.Tamio Fukuyama, Mr. Tim Echeverria and Ms. Beth Zauner (MEI/MSA). Also present was the applicant, Mr. Mark Edlen (Gerding/Edlen Development Co.). The applicant and representatives stayed until 7:15 PM; however, none of the notified public or general public attended this meeting. No meeting minutes were prepared. BEZ/ks c: All Present MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES F:\WPDATA\96-07\96044\18M1.KS A WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services P.O.BOX 64],PORI"LAND,OREGON 47207 503/222-7007 July 26, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Mr. Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Farmers Insurance Property Dear Will: Regarding the subject project, this is to inform you that I have been retained by Mackenzie Saito as Arboricultural Consultant, to serve to completion of the construction project. This letter, in conjunction with the attached Tree Removal Plan, also is submitted to fulfill the Design Review submittal requirements as presented in the pre-application conference notes dated June 13, 1996. As shown on the attached plan, I am told by Mackenzie/Saito that 1)the project proposes retainage of from 50% to 75%of existing trees over 12" in caliper, which will require 50%of the trees removed to be mitigated, according to Section 18.150.070D, and 2) as indicated on the attached plan, 238 trees are being removed, for a total of 4427 caliper inches, and 3) as required by Code, 50% of the caliper inches must be mitigated. I have discussed the requirements for this tree preservation/removal plan by telephone with Dick Bewersdorff, and with you. In addition I have reviewed with the architects and engineers the tree preservation plan requirements for the City of Tigard. I have also made several site visits which have Ied me to the opinion that the proposed plans are workable arboriculturally, subject to my input as described herein. My work on the project, briefly described, will be as follows: 1. Develop a comprehensive report on the condition of the existing trees on the site,to satisfy City of Tigard requirements, including present condition, prognosis and the impact of the construction on the trees slated for preservation and the trees in the area generally. 4 r+ INSPECTION. N DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF TREES,SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS. "'' ' CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING.TRANSPLANTING,PRESERVATION.MAINTENANCE AND G' ARBOREAL PLANNING.COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS.DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS ' ' FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES.LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE 1 r.. IMONY IN COURT CASES. • • • Mr. Will D'Andrea Page 2 July 26, 1996 2. Provide input for specifications of tree preservation as necessary on the construction drawings. 3. Work specifically on site with the project manager and the job superintendent to prescribe preventive measures as construction develops on a situational basis, including,but not limited to, the following: a. pre-construction meetings with the construction contractor will be attended as necessary, matter-of-course; b. specific adjustments in locations of landscape islands as possible to accommodate special trees; c. specific recommendations for retaining wall construction and/or aerification systems around certain trees as may be needed; d. situational on-site input to the contractor for special requirements which may develop for tree preservation as the project proceeds; e. any other arboricultural input as may be required during the entire construction process; f. regular on-site monitoring on a frequent basis, and on-call situational input as necessary. g. In addition, I monitor all of my projects one full growing season following completion,to determine therapeutic tree care needs as may be indicated in the tree population_ In summary, consultation regarding tree preservation done most effectively should begin early and be followed-through as briefy outlined above,to insure that, insofar as state-of-the-art arboricultural practices can provide, all trees slated for preservation(and worth preserving)will be retained on the site at the completion of the project. That is the intent here. Mr. Will D'Andrea Page 3 July 26, 1996 Please advise me if you have any questions relative to this brief outline of work on the project. I am proceeding with deliberate speed to complete the full tree preservation report. Thank you very much. Sincerely, /ice . II wen, B.S., M.A., C.A. American Society of Consulting Arborists#114 cc: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates Beth Zauner /4- " 4-1 121' V 12 121 12" i p" 42 12" 62- ad._ 7y'" 122 It" ,'2" 4.3 64" 03 I Et, „ 1Z3 2-I ' /g" * 425/1 12" 9q- 12"' Iv4 14" azi- /&" '}- Octic- 48 EG Clash 'La Li', 1 S". - 5 7 /(D" 47 2G 43-7 1 - ID 14Y /(o" ¢g _ 12" se 12 120, (7--P 14-" 44 12" tos 1 S lit t2 /0 12 '‘ 42 " 0 22- 172 ' 14 Ca- /0 i sl 12- al 12- 13 I 14- r 160 /' 52 VOA ZS " °i2 1 Co 1 32- l S "it, /li " 5'3 ad& 211 cns 14, (33 Oak 21'i /2' ' 12 '' Gq- L.29 134 t(, r'> l8'" 24-" .95 14 135 20 • /8 ' eco 14-" 61(0 lc. 13i 12 /2 " 5-7 24, 6I-7 Qa.!c 22 13-7 l8 le az& i " i.SS 14-'' 018 14 i 38 2a ' C1._ 4e " 5 Da t_ • .0" 141 12 (5 1 1 ro ' 0�-a✓'1 " Co t R 1‘0" 1,oo 12- 14-o 12 2 /lo" Car 14-'' lo( 12 14-1 12 /2" 02. 24' l02 I(.. 142 Z. _,; /ea " (o3 267 11o3 l a 143 12 24 V1-" 404 2(J 104- 12 i 44- 12 " 12- 105 I 0 f os 12 145 2a 14" (G, LL'r l c& Oa& IU" I 4- 12 --)� 1( " Cr-7 14-" t 07 (Z 147 12. 5 14-" (15 11-f- " t oe, 20" 14"-0 12 ,,) Q51^ 14" 6;1 ca..k . 2-(is *A- t cci ice I itir 12 sue- 24-" 70 I2'" I l 0 16 1 gD wok 22 Oalk_ 14 i 1 12- I-1 I Oca4_ 2Z"' 15i 32 14, 12 20 I12 20 152 1'2- 33" ?3 24- I13 12 153 2-1+ 12'' 7z-J- l2 j 14- 20 l 54 I Ll- 35 14-' I 75 14 II S 12 155 CaL (C°'' 12" 7(v 14 11 c. 1(.0 1.. I4-/' _ ' 14-" 7-7 12 111 14- 157 14 38 Calk -" 76 a-&- 4 I I S l 2- 158 12 7 . 14-" 71 14 111 I 5c L 1 Gait_ 23 7 J l 2" C0 1(o" 1 ZD 12- 1 400 14-" (o-7l '/ 3� " -t,I0 (012 " k--A- N- pa- k-lam`( It* i r -13 1dn'A' * c -5\4 `f' DATE -11 /41V 1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. 162044-P CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SHT. / OF 3 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 0039 •• • MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED (503)224-9560 FAX(503)228-1285 ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - 7`0 e in et , i.2'' DY - / / fz 1,91 _ • 2 rowa--- Ica ZDZ 20 3 12 203 ?)S, Q :.217 - 12 Ki4 I v 144 'LS'S I L 2C6 30 -46- > 'G 14- 10(0 3Cv 2Z)0 'ZO 107 I 207 24 21r I' '9 l� cos 18 230 z,' v_11 Iv 1-491 Oak 1� Z3 r 12 `70 14' '>� G 24 0 tee 231- Pop . -3 co '/ L€ Z" ' I 22 ?�3 12 �� 1 . 42 2-1/-" 242- 22- 234 3Ci —73 12 1-13 16. .2.-B5 3� 74 242' '214 1 a 23G 12 /74 it. 30 X215 I2 237 L . 7( ?.a 21 ri 12 2313 -poe , 3e. 17 34 2t7 14 *c E /p " /2e apt 30 "VS r2- '4 1014 32 Zll 4'2 10 20 2213 IC/ /0/ 2-0 1 3g 32 20 22-2_ 12 • ?3 14- 223 12 i Ad r14. 1.1'/ 22/-f - 24 36 12 " '1 . Iz " 'Q;7 - 12 I S cue i-197 L t7, l .1 v‘;)0 = .'2- 8 +Y26 WI 20 11 442:7 cal. u '°0 3Go. ►/ 4 . !eN— „ 44 `3 11 't 1b Ms— 22 . 77 4(0 ,qg 2(0 P4 rtA. 1e" 1 " BY O - *-C -r d `ig ' D -4. pcu-i4ot 1D^f- , ie- 1sIt•c- DATE _/3d 0 !�, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED �f JOB NO. ZOO 44 CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SHT. 2 OF 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 - PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 ® MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ,_, ( 1 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED k r- r°D 1 .p, �► nteliS r2" ' VP = A . dam _ . e 29'f- 72-S /2.'? wed, * 7- L4 d xi 6/ j �„ vp = S stv -if) = 284 77:-r -L- = 522 -s 4.2 # 5 I fc 2f 4 ave fi'2&=e5 - -75 ot,yeary gt-y Mtherle- 5Z) 7'a "/4427 frt- -a4s 2 = - / ��I " • "/' " _ -1 hjg (3 * ) fa e BY 15.42- DATE —7/549(ei 41, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. 1.1441044 CIVIL• STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SHT. OF 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX(503)226 1285 ® 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Function Defines Form PARKING LIGHTING I I I • 11111 1 ► -- � �� I 1 .111 1- - II',' ' ,.' . .,..�Ir �� ,�..n�"IIliii 111111 ��_-= =.—..... ...-.=-�J -�'�' , � ; /�M��► ►� A���'il Immo IIII j , 1;..:..':::':'../ .....,„„ k AL 7.4461.1 A-SWIM jiji . it 1 I � IIZMINIMMf M �'� o�CI i i I m 1" V - - 1p Id..AIe,llil. —I�S s* , i ' / --....,.._ " /�i -- � �� ___ _ - _...._ , � 1i i i / - ___..., _,.. 1 \ voi. 1,/ , 1 ______,... .. ,,..„, ,..loor 4 ir A b.. Sharp Cutoff. ��� �� J Super Efficiency. The WTC-2 is designed specifically for lower Maximum pole spacings are achieved only when a mounting heights where a relationship with people, "fA<71& . cutoff luminaire is extremely efficient in capturing architecture and landscape is established.At these li'��� ;. lamp output.and redirecting that output at useful lower mounting heights,disability glare from the ; ` J, angles.Every geometric relationship in the WTC-2 fixture is a real possibility. Kim,however,engineers a f' „� V1, '• optical system is designed to maximize luminaire high degree of glare control or"cutoff'into the - -- 1.. efficiency and pole spacing.Highly polished•WTC-2 by mounting the lamps horizontally(parallel to I 1 I I , - i I I 1 hydroformed reflectors direct light where it is needed the ground surface). In this position,the lamp arc is for optimum spacings. Both square and asymmetric well shielded while light below the cutoff angle is III I I light patterns are available for total project flexibility. accurately controlled by Kim's precision hydroformed 1 1 1 I 1 , Further boosting efficiency is reflector. I I I the precisely angled luminaire I i ' plastic enclosure. permitting ' 111 I ' unsurpassed transmission of J.;i high angle light. Because the enclosures are also injection- 111,■••■-•-'" ' 1 III , molded,there is superb clarity '' ' with a minimum of optical ViTO— IN‘ distortion.The WTC-2 `. ∎ av erages 76.45°o efficiency , I I with some lamp modes . I I I I exceeding 80%. Aria Kim Lighting 1 R B 1 Single Function Lumina -Aluminum Shaft PLAZA / WALKWAY LIGHTING '/R B 1 C Single Function Lun-•-are-Concrete Shaft r R B C Unlighted Concrete Board 36iir C--T—":--- Specifications:VRB1 (4) Certification shall be Underwriters Laboratories listed(for 120, • -- -_ 208,240 and 277 Volt only)and Canadian Standards Association• certified(for 120,208,277 and 347 Volt only)for wet locations. Top Cap shall be a one piece aluminum casting 3/16'minimum thickness,secured to louvers by concealed allen screws in keyhole slots.For relamping access, allen screws shall not require complete removal. Louvers shall be a one piece aluminum casting with vertical sup- port ribs at 90°intervals. Horizontal louver blades shall have a 13/: c, depth,a 65°upward pitch and provide light source cutoff above• t�; - -1 horizontal. Louver casting shall be secured to shaft by four internal Ali ,, :; t tie rods. +!' `. Lamp Enclosure shall be one piece tempered molded glass with .;t Y' y �i internal flutes and full gasketing at bottom edge. �� Socket shall be porcelain medium base rated 4KV. II Fixture Head shall allow flow through ventilation around and above < '� ::. the lamp enclosure. ;� ,L .'.., 2•. Shaft shall be one piece extruded aluminum, .125"wall thickness �- -'. ,- with a heavy cast aluminum twist-lock anchor base concealed ' � within the shaft.Concealed set screws shall lock shaft onto the cast ,, a-•r•." . anchor base. :r,,.•_:-11. - -14. .- Ballast shall be high power factor for-20°F. starting,factory mounted ;� •=-pr' to the anchor base and prewired.Wiring shall be supplied from the i I socket for field connection to the prewired ballast components. i�_" '' Anchor Bolts shall be four 3/e"x 10'+2"zinc plated L-hooks,each ,; _ - - w with two nuts,washers and a rigid pressed board template. ° � Finish shall be TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint �;r applied over a chromate conversion coating.Available colors are ^:, , •,, ,u, _ black,dark bronze, light gray or white. 0 ,: ,v .;' ,ry. Specifications:VRB1C ' .--- SAME AS VRB1 EXCEPT:•• .. ,;zt &- i ,V ;, " ,,: Shaft cement shall conform to current specifications for"Portland �'t"x ;+ •a.. . -p `„; Cement."ASTM C150,Type I or II. Aggregates shall meet current .*r•- .—. requirements of"Specifications for Concrete Aggregates,"ASTM - i,i kr T C33.Water shall be clean and free from deleterious amounts of silt, • 0;+:..,„:.:.41,-.' �'�" - - oil, acids, alkalies or organic materials.Wire for reinforcement shall °,a,;•,. . conform to ASTM A185. Steel for lugs and plates shall conform to ASTM A36,or A283 grade D. 4' 'l*,:' Ballast shall be high power factor for-20°F starting,factory mounted '• to a rigid harness for field wiring and suspension from fixture within - .r the concrete shaft. Surface shall be medium sand blasted with anti-graffiti sealer. t Available colors are Charcoal, Brown, Natural Gray or White,integral f in concrete mix. • x ; 1_, a„ - Cure and Strength shall allow for completion of the hydration ►_ , ' _, -•t process,and result in a 28 day compressive strength of not less A. than 4,500 psi. Manufacture shall be by fiberglass molds to insure uniform parts. Mold parting lines may be slightly visible in finished parts. Anchorage shall be by four steel mouting tabs for installation on '4: four 1/2"x 10"+2"zinc electroplated L-hook anchor bolts.Each , .• anchor bolt is supplied with two nuts, two washers,and a rigid . I. pressed board template. ' Shipment shall be palletized with adequate hold-downs to prevent load movement in transit. ..-.rte= �'�_ = Specifications:VRBC ) ..a t:' "4t4 is SAME AS VRB1C EXCEPT NO FIXTURE,ELECTRICAL ELEMENTS, - -O t'".... OR CONDUIT OPENINGS. -,' .y4� ,-.. •••- ,, t r• �• • ,•., }_ 1•,...L Warning:Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with local codes ice"'• .;_ ,� -l.-�► or the National Electrical Code. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. d K.r•; .,r, Nell Light 150W PAR38 INCANDESCENT or HALOGEN LANDSCAPE LIGHTING �/�\�� .:i �p � 'fix.. A.•' 1 ....4.3....; V.:9.'••r•. J• •Y.:•' .. is:y:' °1,::& i:' ..,* .0.` .. (2)3/i"N.P.T. in bottom, °' ",, r'� .L./4.'x`'. ...r:'_:::. T- ■■ ' �, s � • •5 �, 9 "sq q r`te h • i .$;. .-. . � �� i� i •••••• `. 1 :,, of y•' . . .••••. ; 4.15. .•..'.:.ept • Alb, 4114vAiii..."■411/Ahh. 11110, ./, , i t+'T s ♦...•. .��, if 1� Iy 1634" it . . °/.ta' •R•pi •ma ' .,./ii 11�' ''.;(,...:t., a „.',V-.x� Y +. x^,:::::--1:0;:7:wept rainage by others l:. �:� ' ' U.L.listed and C.S.A.cert locations. Cifications 20°lt0° 10° 20° 20°i10°— 0°-10° 20° ure:Cast bronze. /` }. s:Convex tempered clear glass with one-piece silicone gasket. 30° ism 4000 30' 30° FLOOD 750 30° ket:Porcelain medium base, rated 4KV. WNCAND. 33 INCAND. ••• 0/ rig:Cord is prewired to fixture,passing through a brass seal. . r - , . f wire terminates in an anti-siphon barrier, encapsulated in high 40° '� 40° 40° '� Art#4°. =erature sealing compound. Factory pressure-tested at 10 p.s.i. 2coo 450 :Bituminized fibre,9'dia.x 143/4'depth. so° T ,5 ° 50°, 1 �� ► 5 ° Page(by others)required. ,',��,, , •er:Cast aluminum finished black with polished edges, , AT , , 1` / ,•ed to well with socket head set screws. /o° ` :00 70° %0+ ` 150 '' 70° tion Box:Cast aluminum with Yi rigid PVC conduit and brass 80° Aik eo° ao° =-.-= . or fixture cord. 1/4-20 green hex grounding screw provided. so° ` � 90° -. _:compartment volume-40 cubic inches. onduit Taps:Two 3/4'N.P.T. in bottom. '1°- 'r 0°fo°�2b° xture Adjustment:Stainless steel wire hangers suspend fixture 15000 rrom louver and allow 15°tilt,360°rotation. Positive screw locks hold 30° ' PAR38 30 aiming position. spar' 12 HALOGEN 40, . •0d goo° •50 � , 50 /80° , �� 806 90° �,i,� 90 Available Options:Directional Louver supplied in place of standard full louver.Add option catalog number to fixture catalog number. Example:5150/5090DL. Cat.No. Option Construction 5090DL 0, •� Directional Louver-allows Cast Aluminum °at.No. Lamp/Max.Wattage Fixture Construction ''� maximum light lamp tilt P 9 };. sq in direction of lamp tilt 150 150W Cast Bronze ..� while controlling glare •Incandescent .1 in opposite direction. R40; 5293TG Tree Grate Louver-for Cast Iron Incandescent or Halogen mounting Kim Well Lights PAR38 to tree grates by Neenah ote: Lamps by others. Foundry Co. See page 21. 16 Kim Liahtino Direct Burial Light 150/300W 250W PAR38 HALOGEN CENT 250W KR38 or R38 KRYPTON LANDSCAPE LIGHTING INCANDESCENT '--• ..�4.;: '. . .yi,: ..}� -.• ' • -�.�_'" f ' a otit. p 9'h" @ 0 ...--01‘..;1 :41,4., 0 & .. . .,.:0,4,.....: 1....,...4t1,,.......3 ,, (_.. 0 ,7., , .,..... :..f..e.,...:... .„1, ;0: ... ..ri, ...A.....,....c.,.%. _ ‘.. [. 1354" y`l Illii",77- .. .,,. w_..-------..r=.uo. FIMii I 0 . .. •,;.7 4 7. 44.;.411;::: ---.- 10c" . i T - G W. _ � ,L• v L1h1 (2)3/4"N.P.T. .T.in bottom. � ; 4 . .' y t, ' Ar.f4i. ;� .•+I"....S,•, t U.L.listed and C.S.A.certified for wet locations. Specifications 10'—a•-- 20' 20' 10°— 0'—1_zo° Housing:One-piece cast aluminum with bituminous coating R� 50004 2000 avow 10.000 - on below-grade portions,or one-piece cast bronze. Double wall SPOT R40 , 30'260W I 250W 30° separates lamp and splice compartments. Lens retainer and INCAND. '� FLOOD PAR38 PAR38 splice compartment cover are cast aluminum or bronze with 400 INLAND. HALT 9000 HALOGEN P I igp�, NALOGEN � NALOGEN neoprene gaskets. Lamp well continuously welded to housing. a0' 1200 . 40' 6000 40°Lens:Tem ered clear lass,with one iece silicone asket.P 9 P 9 Flat lens 3/s'thick,roundel lens 731 thick. -• , 1 4� �Socket:Porcelain medium base. rated 4KV. 2° I' ,, ,, Lamp Adjustment:20°each side of vertical,326°horizontal ' ' 60. rotation. Positive screw locks on all adjusting brackets hold 70' 3 40 � 71 70' ,""'' , 70° 1 9 aiming position. :, ,./� 80' :• � ' '� 80' Wiring:All components prewired with high temperature wire �� -� • .1 90' �•1•:III 90° terminating in anti-siphon barriers. Isolation chamber filled with flexible high temperature sealing compound. Factory pressure- 20° 10'– 10° 20' tested at 10 p.s.i. Splice compartment volume-40 cubic inches. 250w 72,5001 250W Grounding: '/<-20 green hex head screw in splice compartment. KSPPOOT FLOOD Conduit Taps:Two W N.P.T. in bottom. KRYPTON ,10.000 KRYPTON NCAND. INCAND. 40' 17500, #,.. 4 500, .. s Cat.No. Lamp/Max.Wattage Construction Lens so- �`'.� :•e to 5000 150W-300W Cast Aluminum Roundel Incandescent R40 Available Options:Details and restrictions on page 14.Add option 250W catalog number to fixture catalog number.Example:5000/5081HS. Halogen Cat.No. Option Construction PAR38 5081 HS Half Shield-directional glare control. Cast Aluminum 250W 5181 HS Half Shield-directional glare control. Cast Bronze Krypton Incandescent 5083FL Full Louver-glare control,lens guard. Cast Aluminum KR38, R38 5183FL Full Louver-glare control,lens guard. Cast Bronze 5001 Same as above. Cast Aluminum Flat 5085DL Directional Louver-glare control. Cast Aluminum 5 50 Same as above. Cast Bronze Roundel 5185DL Directional Louver-glare control. Cast Bronze 0 1 5087RG Rock Guard-roundel lens only. Cast Aluminum 5101 Same as above. Cast Bronze Flat 5187RG Rock Guard-roundel lens only. Cast Bronze Note: Lamps by others. 5200GM Grout Mask-for concrete installation. Galvanized Steel Kim Lighting 7 FARMERS INSURANCE OFFICE BUILDINGS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS TIGARD, OREGON August 1, 1996 MEI Project Number 296044.01 PREPARED BY: Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street ,�`Q��-0 PP.0, r ✓ P.O. Box 69039 4 �° e4, � Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 _v 10505 9 Phone (503) 224-9560 j Fax(503) 228-1285 O `/[g y i is ch ' O 9L�0 G. 01/49% eYP 1z-'4-56 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\TS\96044.01\0 1TS.KC TA L B LE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION II. ES TING COND LEIiaNs ACCESS ANALYSIS IV P.ErjEST SAN V ACCESS AND BACKGROUND VI AND TAT-PRaCESS TRIP GETI 1' 'FIC V� ON TRIP DISTRta AND W ASSIGNMENT U' NT ANAL PSIS IX: INTERSECTION C X. C CAPACITY CONCLUSIONS ANALYSIS XT. AND CO APPEND ���NDATIaNS AiIVIDgrA1SPECS1 0�4.0/101TsKC LIST OF FIGURES 1 VICINITY MAP 2 SITE PLAN 3A EXISTING TRAFFIC-AM PEAK HOUR 3B EXISTING TRAFFIC-PM PEAK HOUR 4A BACKGROUND - AM PEAK HOUR 4B BACKGROUND -PM PEAK HOUR 5A IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC - AM PEAK HOUR 5B IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC -PM PEAK HOUR 6A 2001 BASE TRAFFIC - AM PEAK HOUR 6B 2001 BASE TRAFFIC -PM PEAK HOUR 7A TRIP ASSIGNMENT-AM PEAK HOUR 7B TRIP ASSIGNMENT-PM PEAK HOUR 8A 2001 COMBINED TRAFFIC -AM PEAK HOUR 8B 2001 COMBINED TRAFFIC -PM PEAK HOUR F:\WPDATA\SPECS\TS196044.01■01TS.KC L INTRODUCTION The proposed Farmers Insurance Office Buildings are located in Tigard near the intersection of SW 68th Parkway and SW 66th Avenue at the southern end of the Tigard Triangle. The site is bounded on the east by SW 66th Avenue and on the west generally by SW 68th Parkway. SW 68th Parkway also runs through the middle of the site, creating north and south parcels. Corning Medical Labs is directly adjacent to the north and the existing Farmers Insurance building is to the south. The site is located near the intersection of Highway 217 and Interstate 5 with easily accessible interchanges to both. Figure 1 presents the site vicinity map. Four office buildings are proposed on the currently vacant site. They consist of 50,700 and 39,000 s.f buildings on the north parcel and two 50,000 s.f buildings on the south parcel. All buildings will be two stories in height. Access is proposed with two driveways to SW 68th Parkway for each parcel, and a driveway to SW 66th Avenue for the south parcel. The proposed Farmers Insurance Office Buildings site plan is presented in Figure 2. The study area of this traffic impact analysis, as confirmed by City of Tigard staff, generally includes the area of Hampton Street and SW 68th Parkway. In addition to the proposed driveway locations, the following intersections are analyzed: Hampton Street/SW 72nd Avenue Hampton Street/SW 68th Parkway SW 68th Parkway/SW 66th Avenue City staff has requested that traffic conditions in 2001 be reviewed for this analysis. IL EXISTING CONDITIONS Intersection turning movement counts were conducted by Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated (MEI) staff at the study area intersections in May and July 1996. In addition traffic counts were obtained for the intersections of Hampton Street with SW 72nd Avenue and SW 68th Parkway from 1994 and 1995 for determining the historical growth rates. The current traffic volumes are presented in Figures 3A and 3B for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The following is a summary of the roadway classifications and descriptions in the study area: SW 72nd Avenue 2/3 lane Major Collector 35 mph Hampton Street 3 lane Major Collector 35 mph SW 68th Parkway 2 lane Major Collector 40 mph SW 66th Avenue 2 lane Local Street 45 mph Southwest 72nd Avenue generally consists of two travel lanes with turn lanes at the intersection with Hampton Street. A sidewalk is provided on the west side of the road south of the Hampton Street intersection. No sidewalks are provided north of Hampton Street. F:1WPDATA\SPECS\TSV 6044.01\01 TS.KC Hampton Street is a three lane roadway with a continuous left turn lane between SW 72nd Avenue and SW 70th Avenue. Channelized left turn lanes are provided at SW 68th Parkway, 70th Avenue westbound and 69th Avenue eastbound. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway. Hampton Street is generally 44 feet wide, with bus pullouts east of SW 70th Avenue increasing the road width at that location to 60 feet. South of Hampton Street, SW 68th Parkway is a two lane roadway with medians. Travel speeds are approximately 35 mph, although no speed limit is posted for this section of the road. Each travel lane is approximately 23 feet wide. Median openings are provided at two existing driveway locations and at the proposed site access. The median opening is 34 feet wide at the proposed driveway. Sidewalks are provided along the west side of SW 68th Parkway, including along the south parcel's frontage. Sidewalks are not provided on the north parcel frontage. The section of SW 68th Parkway between the two parcels is 28 feet wide without a median. Curbs are provided along the entire length of SW 68th Parkway. Southwest 66th Avenue is a two lane roadway without curbs and sidewalks. It is approximately 30 feet wide along the site frontage, tapering to 25 feet 200 feet south of SW 68th Parkway. ODOT is planning improvements to the Interstate 5 and Highway 217 interchange. These improvements include widening the SW 72nd Avenue overpass from two to five lanes and realigning Hunziker Road to cross Highway 217 and intersect SW 72nd Avenue at Hampton Street. Construction dates have not yet been determined, but it is likely the improvements will not be completed prior to the 2001 analysis year. No other improvements are currently scheduled in the study area. III. ACCESS ANALYSIS Access to the north parcel is proposed to SW 68th Parkway at an existing median break, approximately 680 feet south of Hampton Road and 220 feet west of the intersection with SW 66th Avenue. Access to the south parcel is proposed at two locations on SW 68th Parkway approximately 210 feet and 500 feet west of SW 66th Avenue. The latter driveway is 145 feet east of an existing Farmers Insurance access road. A third driveway is proposed to SW 66th Avenue 350 feet south of SW 68th Parkway. All distances are measured between centerlines. Sight distances recommended in A Policy on Geometric Design published by AASHTO are ten times the posted speed limit or 85th percentile speeds for intersections. Although no speed limit is posted on SW 68th Parkway, travel speeds are approximately 35 mph, with speeds of 25 mph at the curve near the exiting Farmers Insurance driveway. This would require sight distances of 350 feet from the driveways. All of the proposed driveways will have 350 feet or more of sight distance available, except for the north parcel driveway at the median break on SW 68th Parkway. Sight distance to the south is limited to 270 feet by the curvature of the roadway. Travel speeds at the curve are approximately 25 mph, which would allow sight distance less than 350 feet. As is indicated later in this report, all of the proposed driveways will operate at level of service"A" during the peak hours and all other times of the day. F:1W PDATA\SPECS\TS 196044.01101 TS.KC IV. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND TRANSIT Sidewalks are currently provided along both sides of Hampton Street between SW 72nd Avenue and SW 68th Parkway. SW 68th Parkway has sidewalks on the west side of the street, including along the south parcel's frontage. Sidewalks are provided on SW 72nd Avenue only on the west side of the road south of the Hampton Street intersection. The existing sidewalk network provides areas for pedestrians separated from vehicular traffic, and provides a route from the site to bus stops located on Hampton Street. Transit service to the area is provided by Tri-Met route 78. Bus stops with shelters are located on both sides of Hampton Street just east of SW 70th Avenue, within walking distance from the proposed Farmers Insurance Office Buildings. Route 78 travels between downtown Lake Oswego and Beaverton with stops at Portland Community College, the Tigard Transit Center, and Washington Square. Connections can be made to other bus routes at all five locations. V. BACKGROUND AND IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC BACKGROUND TRAFFIC A review of recent traffic counts for the intersections of Hampton Street with SW 72nd Avenue and SW 68th Parkway indicate a growth rate of approximately 5% per year. It should be noted however, that traffic volumes counted in May 1996 at the Hampton Street intersection with SW 72nd Avenue are lower than those from June 1994 for the same time period. It appears that traffic volumes decreased after 1994 in the vicinity of the site. This may be due to the extension of Dartmouth east to SW 68th Parkway and construction of the new SW 72nd Avenue intersection with Highway 99. Both of these improvements provided additional access to the Tigard triangle area. Five years of traffic growth at this 5% rate were applied to all study area intersections to reflect conditions in 2001. Figure 4A and 4B illustrates this growth for the AM and PM peak hours. IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC In-process traffic is traffic which will be generated by projects which have been approved through the City land use approval process, but which were not generating full-buildout traffic volumes at the time of the traffic counts. City of Tigard staff indicated several projects would add traffic to the study area intersections. Most of these projects are small office uses with low numbers of peak hour trips added to the study area intersections. These volumes are accounted for in the background growth rates. One major project in the area which has approval, but is not yet constructed is the Tri-County center proposed for the southwest corner of Dartmouth Street at SW 72nd Avenue. According to the traffic study, Tri-County shopping center traffic will only impact SW 72nd Avenue at Hampton Street. F:\W PDATA\SPECS\TS196044.01\01 TS.KC A proposed 148 unit Homestead Village extended stay hotel is proposed on the west side of SW 68th Parkway, with access directly opposite the north parcel's driveway. Although this development has not yet been approved, it has been included for in-process traffic purposes. Trip assignments for the two in-process projects are shown in Figures 5A and 5B for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Copies of the individual assignment sheets are included in the appendix. Base year 2001 traffic volumes without development of the site are presented in Figure 6. These volumes include existing, background, and in-process traffic. VL TRIP GENERATION Trip generation estimates for the proposed four Farmers Insurance Office Buildings were prepared using rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, Fifth Edition for General Office Buildings. The 190,000 s.f of office space would generate the following daily and peak hour trips: ADT 2277 vpd AM Peak Enter 280 vph Exit 35 vph PM Peak Enter 51 vph Exit 247 vph For purposes of this analysis, all trips generated by this development are assumed to be automobile trips. This provides a worst case analysis. Some transit use is anticipated with the nearest bus stop located on Hampton Street just west of SW 68th Parkway. VII. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT DISTRIBUTION Trip distribution for the Farmers Insurance Office Buildings traffic is based upon evaluation of existing traffic patterns at the study area intersections. Approximately 55% of site traffic will travel north along SW 68th Parkway towards the Interstate 5 interchange at Haines Street, 40%to the south along SW 72nd Avenue to access Highway 217, and 5%to the north on SW 72nd Avenue. Figures 7A and 7B present the trip distribution and the corresponding trip assignments for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Figures 8A and 8B present the anticipated 2001 traffic volumes with full development of the four office buildings. These volumes include 2001 base traffic plus site trip assignments. F:\W PDATA\SPECS\TS\96044.01\01 TS.KC VIII. WARRANT ANALYSIS Peak hour traffic signal warrants presented in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices were reviewed for the volumes anticipated at the intersection of Hampton Street with SW 68th Parkway. Because Hampton Street and SW 68th Parkway have similar approach volumes, both were considered as the major street for signal warrants. The 2001 traffic volumes with development of the site are below the warrants for two lanes on the major street and one lane on the minor street. This intersection operates well with a four-way stop control, in part because of the similar volumes of traffic on the north and west approaches. A traffic signal is not warranted at this time, nor with development of the four office buildings. Left turn lanes are not warranted at the proposed site accesses on SW 68th Parkway due to the low traffic volumes. IX. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Intersection capacity calculations were conducted utilizing the methodologies presented in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. HCS software was used to prepare the capacity and level of service calculations. Copies of the calculations are included in the Appendix. The concept of Level of Service has been developed by traffic engineers to allow a qualitative measure of an intersection's operation. A level of service "A" is representative of generally free-flowing conditions while a level of service "F" is representative of excessive delays. Evaluation of signalized intersection capacity and operation utilizes two criteria standardized in the transportation engineering industry. The first measure of operational acceptability for roadways and intersections is the ratio of traffic volume to capacity of the roadway or intersection. This ratio is referred to as the volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C). The second measure of operation is described by a term called "Level of Service" (LOS). Level of Service is a graded measure of operation ranging from a level "A" for unimpeded free flow, to a level "F" representing congestion, gridlock, and excessive travel delay. A level of service "D" is generally considered acceptable for intersection approaches. Level of service for a signalized intersection is based upon average delay incurred by all vehicles utilizing the intersection during the peak 15 minutes of the design hour. The intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Hampton Street is a signalized intersection. Unsignalized intersections are evaluated on the delay experienced by each lane or lane group and the total intersection average, similarly to signalized intersections. This delay corresponds to the lane or lane group's reserve capacity, which is a measure of the capacity of a movement which is unused. Because major street traffic is nearly unimpeded, the intersection average does not always reflect the delays experienced by side street traffic. For this reason, the lane or lane group that experiences the highest delay will be reported for the intersection as a whole, along with the corresponding level of service and reserve capacity. F:\W PDATA\SPECS\TS196044.01\01 TS.KC The intersection of Hampton Street with SW 68th Parkway is operating with four-way stop control. Left turn lanes are provided on Hampton Street. SW 68th Parkway is striped for a single lane approach in both directions. The predominant traffic movements are eastbound to northbound an southbound to westbound. These two turning movements are complimentary in that they can occur simultaneously. Often when a large percentage of turning movements occur at an all-way stop intersection, the capacity methodologies break down. This is the case for Hampton at SW 68th Parkway which resulted in the southbound approach having higher demand than capacity. Field observations indicated that all the approaches at this intersection operate with little delay. The intersection capacity calculations were adjusting by adding a southbound right turn lane to the input geometry. This has the effect of modeling the right turn as an overlap, or simultaneous movement as the eastbound left turn. The capacity results for this adjustment are presented in the table above which more accurately models the existing intersection operation and estimates future conditions. The right turn does not need to be added to the southbound approach of SW 68th Parkway. The intersection is currently operating and will continue to operate in 2001 at acceptable levels of service with the existing lane configuration. Intersection capacity would only improve slightly with the right turn lane, but on street parking would be lost. All the study area intersections are expected to continue operating at acceptable levels of service with the addition of background, in-process, and site generated traffic. Although the intersection of Hampton Street with SW 72nd Avenue is anticipated to operate at levels of service"C," queue spill back from the Highway 217 off ramp may cause congestion at the intersection during peak hours. The Hunziker overpass and connection to SW 72nd Avenue opposite Hampton is planned as part of the Interstate 5 and Highway 217 interchange improvements. The timing and configuration of this project are not yet known, so only the existing lane configuration was assumed in this analysis. X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Development of the four proposed Farmers Insurance Office Buildings can be accommodated with the existing transportation network in the study area. All the intersections are expected to be operating at a level of service"C" or better with development of the site in 2001. No ofd site improvements are needed to mitigate traffic impacts of the office buildings. Sidewalks are provided along the south parcel frontage and study area roads which allow pedestrian travel separated from vehicles, and provides access to bus stops on Hampton from the site. Sidewalks should be provided on the north parcel frontage of SW 68th Parkway as well. F:1 WP DATA\S P EC S1TS196044.01101 TS.KC All-way stop controlled intersections also are evaluated on the delay experienced by each approach. The delay corresponds to the approach reserve capacity. This methodology works well for intersections with a single lane and even distribution of traffic on each approach and where heavy turning volumes are not present. When multiple lanes are provided on each approach, the majority of traffic is on two or three approaches, or heavy turning volumes are experienced, the methodology begins to break down. When this occurs, a manual survey of existing delays is recommended. The intersection of SW 68th Parkway and SW Hampton Street is an all-way stop controlled intersection. The capacity calculations address existing 1996 traffic conditions, 2001 base conditions without development of the site and 2001 combined traffic after full occupancy of the proposed Farmers Insurance Office Buildings. Figures 8A and 8B illustrate the 2001 combined traffic volumes for AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Combined traffic is a combination of existing 1995 traffic volumes, background growth (5% for five years), in-process traffic, and site generated traffic. The table below summarizes the capacity and level of service calculations. Intersection Capacity and Level of Service INTERSECTION TIME 1996 EXISTING 2001 BASE 2001 COMBINED SW 72nd Ave/ AM 0.442-8.3-B 0.579-9.0-B 0.728-10.2-B A SW Hampton St PM 0.525-13.3-B 0.823-17.2-C 0.887-21.7-C SW 68th Pkwy/ AM 5.2-B 8.1-B 14.5-C B SW Hampton St PM 6.9-B 6.6-B 12.3-C SW 68th Pkwy/ AM n/a 939-3.8-A 597-6.0-B C North Access PM n/a 953-3.8-A 622-5.8-B SW 68th Pkwy/ AM 1150-3.1-A 1150-3.1-A 910-4.0-A D Farmers Access PM 1012-3.6-A 1012-3.6-A 792-4.5-A SW 68th Pkwy/ AM n/a n/a 861-4.2-A E South Access PM n/a n/a 816-4.4-A SW 68th Pkwy/ AM n/a n/a 927-3.9-A F Shared Access PM n/a n/a 919-3.9-A SW 68th Pkwy/ AM 1176-3.1-A 1176-3.1-A 1065-3.4-A G SW 66th Ave PM 1092-3.3-A 1092-3.3-A 993-3.6-A SW 66th Ave/ AM n/a n/a 891-4.0-A H South Access PM n/a n/a 970-3.7-A Unsignalized: Reserve Capacity - Highest Approach Delay (sec) - Level of Service All-way Stop Controlled: Average Delay (sec) -Level of Service Signalized: Volume to Capacity Ratio - Average Delay (sec) - Level of Service F:\W PDATA\.SPECS\TS\96044.01\01 TS.KC XL APPENDIX Figures Traffic Count Summaries In-process Traffic Warrant Analysis Capacity Calculations Queuing Calculations F:1W PDATA\SPECS\TS196044.01101 TS.KC FIGURES 0 NOT TO SCALE G- 99 s f S \ a, Q Atlanta/St Names Rd f� 75 C S (U SPA Ro, qh �,nOUth t v Q 3 N Cl Hermosa W o_ > > 21 7 BE(vetand St m s' s _C ,D +• +, — Gonzaga St - ° °• Hampton St 1. sl Hunt i,- Varns St :1 1 LL . U SITE •....,_ FIGURE 1 DRAWN BY: EAH VICINITY MAP CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation —— 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201—0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 OOTEMP \C:\DWG\WORK\044FC01 OMB 07/30/96 15:26 1:1.00 1 ——— • C :a VACATED ) • mama-............. ow .... wrimiurs.The.do ams. :iv 1 1: C , i ill i .— : ...:! i%1.-- li .... .r ;, '',I: / IFNIF 1 a . 1 l• t # r I - 1t I !iii . • fir• Y...-` \ w. 7,,,,,,.. k.,r, ••"--.. ' '4 rhily'r . ,,'; • .4 ._. -or• . , . , ,ri S• ii Y' .__. Ili : . • ,kr !I ----- 1 ~77 r: VI e r I r la is is ,, i': P. 7 • r a r s• ` \' 1 ,,!7 ti Li ..:::\ VIII ; I ,• . \ li if _s:i, tert ., r ,„ .:, ,,,.,, . \ .fir '\ i' ! r R..._j a •,.....__. i ! r \ -.(-\ " FIGUR >, Q 0 cu r a_ Q 1 -s S NOT TO SCALE > -P +' a, Q A q) g B > 75 • • cU Hampton St ...c h- ■.0 4) N M N 7 N C M 1 ) 1 � n " � 8 115—" 13 L = l] 71—, 5 _1 fr 144 59� t f� 3 E � o arho � H O N M d —V 1 �...... Mb.*\ 1fr © 17 0 (O M W M I \ /1 1 11 0---.' 3 1—' 0—+ • — 0 6— -41-- 3 6-1. } -4 — 3 } �� f r �� I f s 5�� I © © O © O O, 1a CO _1 1 --..� 1 O FIGURE 3A DRAWN BY: EAH 1996 EXISTING TRAFFIC — AM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation -- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 OOTEM \C:\OMf.\w0919\0uf00Y1 ONO 07/70/96 19:29 1:1.00 r I _ _ a) 0 a) >Q a_ S S NOT TO SCALE > +' +' a) A B > 73 • • cu Hampton St - v0 N N (O rn (.O N l 11 \ n r 33 222 52 L • G 29—. �- 79 1 r,- 351 9~ 11 if E N ( � � ° • H ® M ^ 0 11 X No..... © ° N O O nt N 1 L 11 \11 1 ! 13—' 7 _Jr 6—" 0—► •— 0 10--. .-- 7 10—4. 7 4- \ rr ~ \ 1 r"" ~� 1 © © O © M M (O ,1 $ J ~\ 1 O ;2, FIGURE 3B DRAWN BY: EAH 1996 EXISTING TRAFFIC - PM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation -- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 aoTCw \c:\ wo•(\ourcosr 05111 w/ao/as 15:31 I:1.00 I f _,_, 0) 0 > _C Q a_ w S S NOT TO SCALE > +' +' CU A co B > 73 • • cc Hampton st - W M - ^ C d- `` 2 29_,,, 3 D • G 18—. ..— 1 _ f 36 15� ,- 1 tt � 1t C6,- A H ',25), � O O Of - - O N I J � J 0-' -- 1 — s— OJT 0-0. .4— 0 1—. 1 1-1. +— 1 1 O © O © ON N _,1 —..„� 1 O N FIGURE 4A DRAWN BY: EAH BACKGROUND TRAFFIC - AM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 smDW \e:\wm\rORK\OW;04A Old 07/30/ss 1S 33 ::I.ao t i --- QN 0 W > aC Q t1 S S NOT TO SCALE > +' -t-> QJ A ' B Q 75 • • cc Hampton St - i-, ■0 Qj (0 CO in Tr M a V 1L 11 D 8 56 `` 13 D-+ : • G 5—.. .- 20 1r,— 88 2~� 1r� 0 E O 1 0, H to —v l �.� 0 e 1 L 1 j1► 11 3--° 2 _ 2— 0—... 0 3-0. 2 3— +— 2 ~� r'� �� 1 rr 1~� i 0 © S © ^ c° N 1j ! � 1 I O FIGURE 4B DRAWN BY: EAH BACKGROUND TRAFFIC - PM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 *NW \u\ AMORK\aacoy ONO m/w/w iaw I:I.00 I 1 —__ a) 0 0) > 0C Q 0_ S S NOT TO SCALE > +' +> aJ Q A " B > � • • cv Hampton St r\ q) ■.0 In 0 N t[) l \ il � A 1 D . __ G - 10 20—, r •r E tf qtr H•® 2 c° e 7. cn M 11L 20—• `` J.1 L.� J.'� ) L J.1 1 ~'t rr � trr ~ t © © 0 © ■ Pi $ ~V\ t O FIGURE 5A DRAWN BY: EAH IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC - AM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation —— 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 OOTEMP \C:\DWD\wORK\041f0OSA OM8 D7/30/98 15,79 1:1.00 I I —�- >, a) 0 w > _y Q S S NOT TO SCALE > +> +> a A 1:3 co D > 75 • • cu Hampton St - N �0 ■.o O M 0 to N 1 11 \ 2 - D Ai G — 12 16—. or , tr qtr E O N 0 ,° M © H N M 11L 26- --+ •--- ~ 1r J.1 A V - 1 A V 1 1 ~t r" * ~� 1 r e ~� 1 O O O © -v 1 1 _., O FIGURE 5B DRAWN BY: EAH IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC - PM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation -- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 ooiew \CADWG\WORK\w+rwse ore 07/30h11 13:40 i i.00 I ■ —. _ Cl) : 0 > 1 Q Q_ S S NOT TO SCALE > -4' +' cu A B Q aN CO 75 • • cu Hampton St - vj ° � to C , l 11 n • — 11 144— Ns- 16 L ; C] 8s-0- 6 r 190 94 ' 1 r � fi r� 4 E o M2 o CO in 0 . 111r.. H N1 Ln 20— �`` ~ � fir V n V' O 1 a� � — 4 -' jL - 1- j 0—. 0 7—. 4 7—• 4 O O O N • 0 -,11 --...� 1 O FIGURE 6A DRAWN BY: EAH 2001 BASE TRAFFIC - AM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation -- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 ootc■v \c:\0WO\vro�ourco$A ore 07/30/16 moo 1:1.00 I I _ _ >, W 0 > _y Q eL -_C S NOT TO SCALE > +' -H CU A B Q Z5 • - cv Hampton St - Qj CN M .4- M 0 N 1 11L • - 43 278—' 65 L = l] wry 27—+ •— 90 1f,-- 45, 27tiv\ 1r`- 0 E lO N © 10 H !D N N M M 1 ! 26- -0 ..- --„, 1f N 0 M r7 I L 11L 11 16—' NIL._ 9 —' •— 8—• 0--► .4— 0 13—► 4— 9 13— +— 9 ~� r" " --4. if-- 1 fr 5~� 1 O O O © sr "1'9 03 —V ! --..� 1 O N FIGURE 6B DRAWN BY: EAH 2001 BASE TRAFFIC - PM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation —— 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE RIGHTS KENZIEENGI ENGINEERING INCORPORATED ORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 9503 228-1285 Phone: (503)224-9560 (503)228-1285 oohwr \a\owc�woeMoa4rwee owe 07/30/N II02 ,:i.00 i I ——— 411 161 It 2 >n S S NOT TO SCALE > +' +-) CU Q A B Q z • • (v Hampton st VD a - 37 1f54 C i ‘4 (1) .� (2) D - —1414 c; 17-.— �- (1) ;� r (13) 148ti .- E , 1r � 1r H _ e RE.- ../ --� \,, - (10) — © ri � ^ I \ i1 ‘k 11 (27) 48—' s 7 (2)—' —« +- 87—41. (11) —...R } �- R f 8ati� r"� 39—, 1 I rr 7 � 1 I © © O © v 11 ENTER 280 (2)---"' EXIT 35 ----'`\ f 0 FIGURE 7A • DRAWN BY: EAH TRIP ASSIGNMENT - AM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 001CMP \c:\0M0\WON\040007A 011 07/30/55 15,20 1:1.00 r 1 631 >, f57 0 a)4f f4 j L S S NOT TO SCALE > +' +' 0i Q A " B Q � • • (U Hampton St - N O N 391 133 C l � il \ • -- (10) -d• (10) D ; 4 G 3—• (15) r (96) 16 ti r E I r t r O O -v-M H M L. -11 L•- (70) ~� I rr © c M a^, M M 1 L i1 ‘it 11 '—(153) 9— s 1 (12)—f 16—• -.— (81) —... .--15—.�_ rr 7~� 1 rr 2 �� 1 © © N O ^ v © v v M 1 (12)-u ENTER 51 EXIT 247 `.. I 0 FIGURE 7B DRAWN BY: EAH TRIP ASSIGNMENT - PM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation —— 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 00TE1 \c:\DWC WOegourcros ors 07/30/14 icxa I:IAO I I ___ Q > _y Q Q) S S NOT TO SCALE AB QD • • cc Hampton St - `o no o n d I "',Ls 1jL 12 144 18 D ; ! G 106—• .1-- 7 203 242— 4 E ' t � 1f O o of o1 N o 1A c0 © N M M 20— `s- 10 —. f- 1f M c0 CO IA d N I \ ,� j \A 1j 0— `— 26 48— `` 7 3—" 0—• 0 9 41 5 7--•R •-- 4 84 r 0 39 1 f 7 6~ R 1 f 1 1 O © o © o in d � o 2--Ar j 0 1 O FIGURE 8A DRAWN BY: EAH 2001 COMBINED TRAFFIC - AM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation -- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 0011P \C:\0w0\W01tlf\0uf00Y OYY 07/30/96 10:32 1:1.00 1 1 _ >, QJ 0 0.) > 1 Q S S NOT TO SCALE > +' +' cu A .0 B Q 75 • • cv Hampton St - Qo co M d (D m N N) ( CD CO N Ij 1 " 1 I n I 53 278 75 L ; C] 28-4. ...-- 114 r Ar-- 547 43�\ I r if- 0 E iiiiir O5 0 ^ 0 • H O 0, i tp N ^ N N st N N) V . / 26-1" — 70 0— t— 0 0~ r o S 1 f O v v u) m (o v sr I L ) A ) l 16—.' 162 9—' `` 1 20—' 0-4- 0 29—. .4 — 90 13-4. } �— 9 } tS�. r� 0 7�� I �r 2 5~� I O O n 0 O M N © - o N) C0 Al i 12—' 0 ~ I O O N a FIGURE 8B DRAWN BY: EAH 2001 COMBINED TRAFFIC - PM PEAK CHECKED BY: BTA FARMERS INSURANCE DATE: JULY 30, 1996 JOB NUMBER:296044.01 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation _— 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201—0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 ootcrr \e:\orc\WORK\0wG0Ie ore 07/10/94 1e31 1:I.04 I, _ _ TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARIES 7v '°(° 3-oo IS-2 J- (, �:I7:i5"' °116.°116.1 ys .3yl RIGHT THRU LEFT 's ,?20__. ,„„, _ _ , .....) I . L g...3...„ fr ' y.X33 i 1-NJ ...... LI 1:7- -I STACK NCB STACK c B J 3 v1 = �� ,, tj., _ T,I re/.\; sT. 1 I N t_ STACK STACK ) _ F- C� 1 I r LEFT THRU RIGHT DATE: 5/,2qMo TIME PERIOD: 7. 3c\ i2. TO: --3 '.J i 3 � o AM � NO TH PM 0 �°lo Kv COUNTED BY: al 4-1-0114Es7 b. 444 ri 1 72114 CHECKED BY: EAff DATE: Sjg(z2. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NUMBER: � _ ZGI Z�_ Civil • Structural • Transportation -- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 © NACKENZIE ENC:NEERINC INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1996 ALL RIGI-IT$ REScwED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 y•is 252 �,1 `e;3v 3,3 Gdla 14 2l.` 5" 3y0 5:ao 3as S:6S 35 q (,, , ig S: 3,z__ (o.oa Pte = f -- Q � RIGHT THRU LEFT it 3q 1 lo... 7._ 0 J t...) ,,,,„_) , . Li_ 3 -4 1 STACK CN STACK /�.� V J L\13 ) , = \c c. z—.. 4�■y t- t- Nairnpfa?Si c ti 1-. STACK STACK 351 f = _ W -4) 1 r IrT LEFT THRU RIGHT DATE: 5.. V 9& At TIME PERIOD: Si' 30 � � !q ?(40 TO: 3f..)AM Li NORTH PM t°'Z COUNTED BY: 14_,5 3'/ /kW cr— CHECKED,QV. DATE:JOB NUMBER: /9!02.21, MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation - - 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENC:NEERINC INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201—0C39 1996 AU. RICI T5 RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 6:3) .7s L:14 3 3 7D W 7'040 9 Li- ,:,S � 159 7: 519 '7 NS- 151 ( q. 3 LI- 4 29 i3:00 1,-f_, 8.,5- 9:3o 135 RIGHT THRU LEFT pry z - 0. 82. J 1 � � 9 T 3 yS ti- iic = I —W' STACK -s STACK EE , 3 v) N°14"44-01-14 fr15 07• " LI /e CC 5-- I-� -,I SW PTO ST c- 1 L� STACK STACK 2 J �� F J W 1 1 r J LEFT THRU RIGHT DATE: 5/23/9` TIME PERIOD: 7 ' /S TO: 8' +S -63- AM NO TH PM ❑ . t -f 3 °10 41/ COUNTED BY: bG CHECKED BY: E 7 H DATE: JOB NUMBER: JgL.ZLL MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1996 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 I I N:iJD 1"7.3 ' 4:15- 13 4 3 0 670 til Li :30 131 y:Ltc 14N 5:00 LS 3 (a�3 5:15- 131" ` I 5..3.0 r co '0 RIGHT THRU LEFT J I 3-- L .._ 22Z W 2. -_, STACK _s STACK E2 \ c �+of dw.�i+4 MS V1 /2.$.7o LO 3 z-3%- --9 t— !— /2_6 cc C1, s� zdki ST � � 9 ._ STACK STACK = C7 u_ _lims) W -"I) 1 r J LEFT THRU RIGHT ��// DATE: 5/Z3/`IG jq 5 L-11 —6-- TIME PERIOD: Y=3a TO: 5:30 AM r.:3 NORTH PM r. 1470 rw COUNTED BY: AL CHECKED BY DATE: JOB NUMBER: igL22.-L MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation -"- 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENCINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1996 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 • 4,. 3c se_ & as 2/ 99 7 39 S c 3 e ( 8,,,,, `1 7` a',s ,Z 8 I- = c. (v RIGHT THRU LEFT l/ II -56 I L _ i L'"") W 0(.....1-- STACK STACK EE •_ / T .77n71 ‘ t- r-- C° 57 = STACK .STACK r." _Imm.1) ix W . -411 I r J , - LEFT THRU • RIGHT )ii, _ q . DATE: . 9(0 TIME PE IOD: 33-' AM, , N RTH PM ❑ COUNTED BY: C'Lie _F_A it1 1�1 sU2 ifiry c� f2o PFlz7y CHECKED BY: -�-iI DATE: -7--Yr1 f 9r fi J08 NUMBER: yy• 0/ MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 © JACXENZIE ENGNS^.71NC INCCRPCRATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1996 Au. R1CHHT5 RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)226-1285 t 4:lc j 71 `x` 30 y1 tf,'fc 13 1 10 L-4- 2--- ;1<" Iv c;45 RIGHT THRU LEFT lf(E= .6 -7 I L._ , k,.......I l' irni w c0 -I STACK SACK E 1 /^/I .--t," y� J ' 'Y>j^:1��Ala ti.( c41 —. \� ~■= c— s C° STACK STACK 'I"—I1 =� c ' 1 . -111111 1 r ._. LEFT THRU - RIGHT DATE: 7'2-'676 ) 111( TIME PERIOD: 4-.-ro TO: 5 Otp 3 D AM ❑ R N TH PM jEl COUNTED BY: :V- /l FArz.nt-2-5 TA;SU2i•3-tj;CE I7f?6P -72 7Y CHECKED BY: 131-f- DATE: 7-25-9C Joe NUMBER: 21& .p-1 . 0/ MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 © 'JACKENZFE ENGNE.INC INCORPCRATED Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 1995 au. RiCrITS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC 0 CU >, 3 Q Q_ S 5,,0 1 S -P CN 1 (5/10) CO ■0 0J 40/50 1 > Hampton St 1 (45/45) 75 A ‘40...-c Cc D(50/45) 1 1 55/40 L N M M M 1 11 \ i1 (1) 1 1 (20 )1 A M • 20--- (11) —. i rr `,0, ~� rf 20�� i r` ~\ 1 O co © © O K) (D N M 1 ‘A 11L 11 2 (26)-' P N 16— •— (14) i r — 12 ~b r0 16 -.R 1 I. ~ \ I DRAWN BY: EAH TRIP ASSIGNMENT - SCENARIO I CHECKED BY: BTA HOMESTEAD VILLAGE DATE: JUNE 1996 JOB NUMBER:196226 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation —— 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 O 995 MACKENZIE RIC TSERESERVEDORPORATED Phone: (503)224-95601 •O FAX: (503)228-1285 00T Vt\ *s\II \i2vm7A WI a/aps 1440 1.1m , I —. 0 a ao 99 7 * dr Atlanta Si: Hanes Rd Q S�t P C CP (1.1 SsPn Q/� COUNTY h CENTER 'S a ; v >al Herr,osa V s v > d 217 Berveland St m s s CD 1 — Gonzaga St `) ...0 ° —THarnpton S 5 c yVn '!`'Pr ` n 1'1 LO ! l Vnrns St _AIL AM (..." ir...— co 0 ,n N PM irr -."..\1 0 Ln 1V DRAWN BY: EAH IN-PROCESS TRAFFIC CHECKED BY: BTA DATE: JUNE 1996 -re) CdUNJ-r' CE.,-frER JOB NUMBER:196226 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED SHEET OF Civil • Structural • Transportation 0690 S. W. Bancroft Street • P.O. Box 69039 ©MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Portland, Oregon 97201—0039 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Phone: (503)224-9560 • FAX: (503)228-1285 OOTEMP \H:\PROJECTS\196226\TRAFFIC\226FlG05 EAH 06/06/96 14:17 1:1.00 1 1 ——— WARRANT ANALYSIS COYhF3IN&D TP2 fflC 8 Witt/my / ,1f}{�VIP 10►�f ST,� T MA3�►Z STREET L1N� FIGURE 4-5. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT HAn+PfLN S7 I > I 600 I ...41 2 OR MORE LANES Er 2 OR MORE LANES wQ I I 500 I I I I I w 2 OR MORE LANES Er 1 LANE °C c 400 A ,_cc d = -t,y P 1 LANE Er 1 LANE 324 ►d - - .1 Q 300 �`.� -'� 200 ill 6 1 s ■ �_ * j � 100 I 400 2151,600 4" 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH *NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET a) APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER w THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. m` CD CAPACITY CALCULATIONS EXISTING TRAFFIC HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 06-06-1996 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 06-06-1996 Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Streets: (E-W) SW HAMPTON STREET (N-S) SW 72ND AVENUE Streets: (S-W) SW HAMPTON STREET (N-S) SW 72ND AVENUE Analyst: HRH File Name: A96EAM.HC9 Analyst: RAH File Name: A96EPM.HC9 Area Type: Other 6-5-96 AM PEAR Area Type: Other 6-5-96 PM PEAR Comment: 1996 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS - AM PEAS Comment: 1996 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS - PM PEAR Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound L T R L T R L T R 1 L T R L T R I T A L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volumes 144 8 211 3601 31 326 Volumes 351 33 359 1761 22 462 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 01 0 RTOR Vol. 0 01 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LB Left NB Left EH Left NB Left Thru Thru • Thru Thru • Right Right Right Right • Pods Peels • Peds Pads • WB Left • SB Left • WB Left • SB Left • Thru Thru Thru Thru • • Right • Right Right • Right Peds • Peda Peds • Peds NB Right RB Right NB Right EH Right SB Right WB Right SB Right NB Right Green 22.0A Green 5.0A 61.0A Green 41.0A Green 7.0A 40.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: 81 85 *6 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: *1 *5 *6 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS Monts Cap Plow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS WE L 407 1770 0.437 0.230 21.8 C 21.7 C WB L 751 1787 0.525 0.420 14.5 B 14.2 B R 364 1583 0.027 0.230 19.3 C R 672 1599 0.055 0.420 11.1 B NB T 1155 1863 0.225 0.620 5.4 B 6.2 B NB T 771 1881 0.523 0.410 14.8 B 14.2 8 R 981 1583 0.452 0.620 6.7 B R 656 1599 0.302 0.410 12.9 B SB L 106 1770 0.358 0.060 30.1 D 5.8 B SB L 144 1805 0.173 0.080 27.8 D 11.4 B T 1323 1863 0.304 0.710 3.5 A T 988 1900 0.525 0.520 10.7 B Intersection Delay • 8.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS . B Intersection Delay • 13.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS . B Lost Time/Cycle, L . 9.0 sec Critical v/e(x) • 0.442 Lost Time/Cycle, L . 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.525 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name C96EAM2.HCO File Name C96EPM2.HC0 Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PKWY (E-W) SW HAMPTON ST Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PRKWY (E-W) SW HAMPTON ST Analyst EAH Analyst EAH Date of Analysis 6/4/96 Date of Analysis 6/4/96 Other Information C96EAM2 - 1996 EXISTING - AM PEAK Other Information C96EPM2 - 1996 EXISTING COUNTS - PM PEAK All-way Stop-controlled Intersection All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 la 0 1 la 0 0> la 0 0, 1 1 No. Lanes 1 la 0 1 Sa 0 0> Is 0 0> 1 1 Volumes 115 71 59 3 5 13 4 3 0 29 44 173 Volumes 222 20 9 0 79 52 37 54 0 13 16 171 PHF .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 PHF .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 2 2 2 1 1 1 14 14 14 3 3 3 CV's (t) 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB ES WE NB SB LT Flow Rate 140 4 5 35 LT Flow Rate 331 0 55 19 RT Flow Rate 72 16 0 211 RT Flow Rate 13 78 0 255 Approach Flow Rate 299 26 9 300 Approach Flow Rate 374 196 136 298 Proportion LT 0.47 0.15 0.56 0.12 Proportion LT 0.89 0.00 0.40 0.06 Proportion RT 0.24 0.62 0.00 0.70 Proportion RT 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.86 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 26 299 300 9 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 196 374 298 136 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 309 309 325 325 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 434 434 570 570 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.47 0.04 0.01 0.47 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.37 0.20 0.14 0.30 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.04 0.47 0.47 0.01 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.20 . 0.37 0.30 0.14 Lanes on Subject Approach 2 2 1 2 Lanes on Subject Approach 2 2 1 2 Lanes on Opposing Approach 2 2 2 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 2 2 2 1 LT, Opposing Approach 4 140 35 5 LT, Opposing Approach 0 331 19 55 RT, Opposing Approach 16 72 211 0 RT, Opposing Approach 78 13 255 0 LT, Conflicting Approaches 40 40 144 144 LT, Conflicting Approaches 74 74 331 331 RT, Conflicting Approaches 211 211 88 88 RT, Conflicting Approaches 255 255 91 91 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.15 0.47 0.12 0.56 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.89 0.06 0.40 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.62 0.24 0.70 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.40 0.03 0.86 0.00 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.44 0.44 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.17 0.17 0.58 0.58 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.68 0.68 0.27 0.27 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.59 0.59 0.16 0.16 Approach Capacity 943 645 399 565 Approach Capacity 914 523 369 444 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 299 943 0.32 3.3 A ES 374 914 0.41 4.7 A WE 26 645 0.04 1.2 A WB 196 523 0.38 4.2 A NB 9 399 0.02 1.1 A NB 136 369 0.37 4.1 A SB 300 565 0.53 7.5 B SB 298 444 0.67 12.8 C Intersection Delay - 5.20 Intersection Delay • 6.93 Level of Service (Intersection) . B Level of Service (Intersection) • B CAPACITY CALCULATIONS 2001 BASE TRAFFIC BM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 07-29-1996 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 07-29-1996 Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Streets: (E-W) SW HAMPTON STREET (N-S) SW 72ND AVENUE Streets: (E-W) SW HAMPTON STREET (N-S) SW 72ND AVENUE Analyst: EAH File Name: AO1BAM.HC9 Analyst: RAH File Name: A01BPM.HC9 Area Type: Other 7-29-96 AM PEAK Area Type: Other 7-29-96 PM PEAK Comment: 2001 BASE TRAFFIC COUNTS - AM PEAK Comment: 2001 BASE TRAFFIC COUNTS - PM PEAK Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound L T R L T R L T R I L T R L T R L T R L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 2. I 1 1 Volumes 190 11 350 4681 41 470 Volumes 451 43 699 2331 31 828 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 01 0 RTOR Vols 0 01 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 Signal Operations Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ER Left NB Left RB Left NB Left • Thru Thru • Thru Thru • Right Right • Right Right • Peds Peds • Peds Peds WB Left • SB Left • WB Left • SB Left • Thru Thru • • Thru Thru • * Right • Right Right • Right Peds * Peds Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right NB Right ER Right SB Right WB Right SB Right WB Right Green 21.OA Green 5.OA 62.OA Green 33.5A Green 5.OA 49.5A Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS WB L 389 1770 0.603 0.220 24.6 C 24.3 C WB L 617 1787 0.822 0.345 25.5 D 24.5 C R 348 1583 0.040 0.220 19.8 C R 552 1599 0.087 0.345 14.3 B NB T 1174 1863 0.368 0.630 5.8 B 6.9 B NB T 950 1881 0.826 0.505 17.9 C 15.8 C R 997 1583 0.580 0.630 7.6 B R 807 1599 0.324 0.505 9.6 B SB L 106 1770 0.480 0.060 32.0 D 6.1 B SB L 108 1805 0.323 0.060 29.7 D 14.5 B T 1341 1863 0.432 0.720 3.8 A T 1130 1900 0.823 0.595 13.9 B Intersection Delay . 8.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS . B Intersection Delay . 17.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS . C Lost Time/Cycle, L . 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.579 Lost Time/Cycle, L . 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.823 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name BO1BAM.HCO File Name B01BPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PKWY (E-W) SW HAMPTON ST Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PRKWY (E-W) SW HAMPTON ST Analyst BTA Analyst BTA Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Other Information BO1BAM - 2001 BASE AM PEAK Other Information BO1BPM - 2001 BASE PM PEAK ADJ. PUP All-way Stop-controlled Intersection All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - L T R L T R L T A L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 l< 0 1 1< 0 0> is 0 0> 1 1 No. Lanes 1 lc 0 1 is 0 0> l< 0 0> 1 1 Volumes 144 89 94 4 6 16 16 13 1 36 68 216 Volumes 278 25 27 1 99 65 60 80 1 16 36 214 PUP .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 PHP .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 2 2 2 0 0 0 14 14 14 3 3 3 CV's (t) 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 PCE's 1 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EH WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 176 5 20 44 LT Flow Rate 309 1 67 18 RT Flow Rate 115 20 1 263 RT Flow Rate 30 72 1 238 Approach Flow Rate 400 32 37 390 Approach Flow Rate 367 183 157 296 Proportion LT 0.44 0.16 0.54 0.11 Proportion LT 0.84 0.01 0.43 0.06 Proportion RT 0.29 0.63 0.03 0.67 Proportion RT 0.08 0.39 0.01 0.80 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 32 400 390 37 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 183 367 296 157 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 427 427 432 432 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 453 453 550 550 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.47 0.04 0.04 0.45 Proportion, Subject Approach Plow Rate 0.37 0.18 0.16 0.30 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.04 0.47 0.45 0.04 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.18 0.37 0.30 0.16 Lanes on Subject Approach 2 2 1 2 Lanes on Subject Approach 2 2 1 2 Lanes on Opposing Approach 2 2 2 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 2 2 2 1 LT, Opposing Approach 5 176 44 20 LT, Opposing Approach 1 309 18 67 RT, Opposing Approach 20 115 263 1 RT, Opposing Approach 72 30 238 1 LT, Conflicting Approaches 64 64 181 181 LT, Conflicting Approaches 85 85 310 310 RT, Conflicting Approaches 264 264 135 135 RT, Conflicting Approaches 239 239 102 102 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.16 0.44 0.11 0.54 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.01 0.84 0.06 0.43 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.63 0.29 0.67 0.03 Proportion AT, Opposing Approach 0.39 0.08 0.80 0.01 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.15 0.15 0.42 0.42 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.19 0.56 0.56 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.62 0.62 0.31 0.31 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.53 0.53 0.19 0.19 Approach Capacity 910 629 430 595 Approach Capacity 873 504 392 464 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 400 910 0.44 5.3 B EH 367 873 0.42 4.9 A WB 32 629 0.05 1.2 A WB 183 504 0.36 4.0 A NB 37 430 0.09 1.4 A NB 157 392 0.40 4.6 A SB 390 595 0.65 12.0 C SB 296 464 0.64 11.3 C Intersection Delay . 8.05 Intersection Delay . 6.57 Level of Service (Intersection) • B Level of Service (Intersection) . B Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 Pile Name CO1BAM.HCO Pile Name C01BPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PRKWY (B-W) ACCESS Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PARKWAY (8-W) ACCESS Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst BTA Analyst ETA Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Other Information C01BAM - 2001 BASE AM PEAK Other Information C01BPM - 2001 BASE PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0. 1 0 0 1. 0 0> 0. 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1. 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1 4 51 33 20 1 Volumes 1 25 13 32 26 1 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHF .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 NC's (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SV/RV's (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical pollow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB KB Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EH Conflicting Flows: (vph) 68 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 29 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1279 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1339 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1279 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1339 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 84 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 45 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1563 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1632 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1563 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1632 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Plow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WE KB Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EH Conflicting Flows: (vph) 72 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 55 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 962 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 984 Major LT, Minor TH Major LT, Minor TX Impedance Factor: 1.00 Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 961 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 983 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App EB L 29 961 . > > 8B L 36 983 > > > 969 3.8 A 3.8 990 3.8 A 3.8 KB R 1 1279 > . > EB R 1 1339 > > > NB L 1 1563 2.3 A 0.4 NB L 1 1632 2.2 A 0.1 Intersection Delay . 0.8 Intersection Delay . 1.2 Canter For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name DO1BAM.HCO Pile Name DO1BPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PRKWY (E-W) FARMERS DRIVE Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PARKWAY (E-W) FARMERS DRIVE Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst ETA Analyst BTA Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Other Information DO1CAM - 2001 BASE AM PEAK Other Information D01BPM - 2001 BASE PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1. 0 0> 0. 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1< 0 0> 0< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1 4 7 44 1 1 Volumes 1 9 13 1 16 1 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHP .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (1) 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical 'Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB BB Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB BB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 29 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 14 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1339 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1362 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1339 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1362 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 51 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 14 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1621 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1688 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1621 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1688 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 TN Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB BB Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 34 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 24 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1012 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1025 Major LT, Minor TN Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1011 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1024 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App BB L 1 1011 . . > BB L 22 1024 > > > 1152 3.1 A 3.1 1035 3.6 A 3.6 BB R 1 1339 . > > KB R 1 1362 > > > NB L 1 1621 2.2 A 0.4 NB L 1 1688 2.1 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 1.3 Intersection Delay s 1.3 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 Pile Name GO1BAM.HCO File Name GO1BPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) SW 66TH AVE (E-W) SW 68TH PKWY Streets: (N-S) SW 66TH AVE (R-W) SW 68TH PKWY Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst BTA Analyst BTA Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Other Information GO1BAM - 2001 BASE AM PEAR Other Information GO1BPM - 2001 BASE PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T A L T R L T R L I R L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1< 0 0> 04 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1. 0 0> 0< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1 11 101 4 1 6 Volumes 4 38 3 5 B 5 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PUP .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (111 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (%) 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical ' Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tgl Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Step 1: RI from Minor Street WE RB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 103 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 6 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1228 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1375 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1228 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1375 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 105 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 8 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1528 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1699 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1528 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1699 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RI Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) PT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB BB Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB RB Conflicting Plows: (vph) 115 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 48 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 908 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 993 Major LT, Minor TH Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 907 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 989 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App KB L 1 907 > > > BB L 11 989 > > > 1186 3.1 A 3.1 1110 3.3 A 3.3 BB R 9 1228 > > > BB R 7 1375 > > > NB L 1 1528 2.4 A 0.0 NB L 6 1699 2.1 A 0.1 Intersection Delay - 0.2 Intersection Delay ■ 0.6 CAPACITY CALCULATIONS 2001 COMBINED TRAFFIC HCI: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 07-30-1996 ECM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 07-30-1996 Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Streets: (E-W) SW HAMPTON STREET (N-S) SW 72ND AVENUE Streets: (E-W) SW HAMPTON STREET (N-S) SW 72ND AVENUE Analyst: BAH Pile Name: AOICAM.HC9 Analyst: BAH File Name: A01CPM.HC9 Area Type: Other 7-30-96 AM PEAK Area Type: Other 7-30-96 PM PEAK Comment: 2001 COMBINED TRAFFIC COUNTS - AM PEAK Comment: 2001 COMBINED TRAFFIC COUNTS - PM PEAK Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- NO. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1. 1 Volumes 203 12 350 619 55 470 Volumes 547 53 699 250 33 828 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BB Left NB Left ER Left NB Left Thru Thru • Thru Thru • Right Right • Right Right • Peds Peds • Pads Peds • WB Left • SB Left • WB Left • SB Left • Thru Thru • • Thru Thru • • Right • Right Right • Right Peds • Peds Peds • Peds NB Right BB Right NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0A Green 5.OA 65.OA Green 37.0A Green 5.0A 46.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: 81 *5 k6 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: *1 k5 *6 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Plow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS WB L 336 1770 0.746 0.190 30.7 D 30.2 D WB L 679 1787 0.906 0.380 30.2 D 28.7 D R 301 1583 0.050 0.190 21.4 C R 608 1599 0.099 0.380 12.9 B NB T 1230 1863 0.351 0.660 4.9 A 7.6 B NB T 884 1881 0.888 0.470 23.4 C 20.1 C R 1045 1583 0.731 0.660 9.1 0 R 752 1599 0.374 0.470 11.2 B SB L 106 1770 0.640 0.060 37.9 D 6.7 B SB L 108 1805 0.342 0.060 29.9 D 18.6 C T 1397 1863 0.415 0.750 3.1 A T 1064 1900 0.874 0.560 18.1 C Intersection Delay . 10.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS . B Intersection Delay - 21.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS . C Lost Time/Cycle, L . 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.728 Lost Time/Cycle, L . 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) . 0.887 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name BO1CAM3.HCO Pile Name BO1CPM3.HC0 Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PKWY (E-W) SW HAMPTON ST Streets: IN-5) SW 68TH PRKWY (E-W) SW HAMPTON ST Analyst BTA Analyst EAH Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Other Information BO1CAM3 - 2001 COMBINED AM PEAK Other Information BO1CPM3 - 2001 COMBINED PM PEAK ADJ. PHP W/O LT TURN All-way Stop-controlled Intersection All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 1s 0 1 14 0 0s i< 0 Os 1 1 No. Lanes 1 1< 0 1 1< 0 0> 1< 0 Oa 1 1 Volumes 144 106 242 4 7 18 29 32 1 47 172 216 Volumes 278 28 43 0 114 75 151 212 1 18 66 214 PHF .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 .82 PHF .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (f) 2 2 2 0 0 0 14 14 14 3 3 3 CV's (f) 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 PCE's 1 1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EH WB NB SB EH WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 176 5 35 57 LT Flow Rate 309 0 168 20 RT Flow Rate 295 22 1 263 RT Flow Rate 48 83 1 238 Approach Flow Rate 600 36 75 530 Approach Flow Rate 388 210 405 331 Proportion LT 0.29 0.14 0.47 0.11 Proportion LT 0.80 0.00 0.41 0.06 Proportion RT 0.49 0.61 0.01 0.50 Proportion RT 0.12 0.40 0.00 0.72 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 36 600 530 75 Opposing Approach Plow Rate 210 388 331 405 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 605 605 636 636 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 736 736 598 598 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.48 0.03 0.06 0.43 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.29 0.16 0.30 0.25 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.03 0.48 0.43 0.06 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.16 0.29 0.25 0.30 Lanes on Subject Approach 2 2 1 2 Lanes on Subject Approach 2 2 1 2 Lanes on Opposing Approach 2 2 2 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 2 2 2 1 LT, Opposing Approach 5 176 57 35 LT, Opposing Approach 0 309 20 168 RT, Opposing Approach 22 295 263 1 RT, Opposing Approach 83 48 238 1 LT, Conflicting Approaches 92 92 181 181 LT, Conflicting Approaches 188 188 309 309 RT, Conflicting Approaches 264 264 317 317 RT, Conflicting Approaches 239 239 131 131 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.14 0.29 0.11 0.47 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.80 0.06 0.41 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.61 0.49 0.50 0.01 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.40 0.12 0.72 0.00 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.15 0.15 0.28 0.28 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.26 0.26 0.52 0.52 Proportion ET, Conflicting Approaches 0.44 0.44 0.50 0.50 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.32 0.32 0.22 0.22 Approach Capacity 870 663 491 696 Approach Capacity 701 368 514 547 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EH 600 870 0.69 13.8 C ES 388 701 0.55 8.2 B WB 36 663 0.05 1.2 A WB 210 368 0.57 8.8 B NB 75 491 0.15 1.8 A NB 405 514 0.79 20.0 D SB 530 696 0.76 18.0 C SB 331 547 0.60 10.0 B Intersection Delay • 14.50 Intersection Delay . 12.31 Level of Service (Intersection) . C Level of Service (Intersection) • C Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 Pile Name COICAM.HCO File Name CO1CPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PRKWY (E-W) ACCESS Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PARKWAY (E-W) ACCESS Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst BTA Analyst BTA Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Other Information CO1CAM - 2001 COMBINED AM PEAK Other Information CO1CPM - 2001 COMBINED PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 1. 0 0> 1. 0 0> 1< 0 0> 1< 0 No. Lanes 0. lc 0 0> lc 0 0> lc 0 0> lc 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1 26 1 81 212 33 20 1 1 1 1 10 Volumes 1 178 1 15 44 32 26 1 1 1 1 70 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHI, .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB BB Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB BB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 26 228 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 178 60 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1343 1061 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1125 1291 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1343 1061 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1125 1291 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.91 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 27 245 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 179 76 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1664 1310 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1409 1577 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1664 1310 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1409 1577 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.93 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.91 1.00 of Queue-free State: 0.98 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB BB Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB BB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 354 338 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 270 255 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 711 725 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 787 802 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.91 0.91 due to Impeding Movements 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 647 660 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 774 789 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB EB Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB RB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 338 342 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 256 290 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 675 671 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 753 719 Major LT, Minor TH Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.91 0.91 Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.93 0.93 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.93 0.92 due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.90 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 627 618 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 742 648 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App BB L 29 618 > . > BB L 36 648 > > > ES T 1 660 > 628 > 6.0 > B 6.0 EB T 1 789 > 660 > 5.8 . B 5.8 EB R 1 1061 > > > BB R 1 1291 > > > NB L 1 627 > > NB L 1 742 > > > NB T 1 647 > 1180 > 3.1 > A 3.1 WB T 1 774 > 1114 > 3.5 > A 3.5 NB R 14 1343 > > > NB R 97 1125 > > > NB L 1 1310 2.8 A 0.1 NB L 1 1577 2.3 A 0.0 SB L 117 1664 2.3 A 0.6 SB L 21 1409 2.6 A 0.4 Intersection Delay - 0.9 Intersection Delay - 1.2 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name DO1CAM.HCO File Name DO1CPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PRKWY (E-W) FARMERS DRIVE Streets: (N-S) SW 68TH PARKWAY (E-W) FARMERS DRIVE Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst BTA Analyst ETA Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Date of Analysis 7/31/96 Other Information 001CAM - 2001 COMBINED AM PEAK Other Information DO1CPM - 2001 COMBINED PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R I T A L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1< 0 0> 0< 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 la 0 0> 0< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1 26 178 44 1 1 Volumes 1 162 44 1 16 1 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHF .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors • Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EH Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EH Conflicting Flows: (vph) 200 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 44 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1096 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1315 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1096 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1315 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Step 2: LT from Major Street SH NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 222 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 45 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1344 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1632 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1344 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1632 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 PT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Step 4: LT from Minor Street WE HS Conflicting Flows: (vph) 227 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 208 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 782 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 802 Major LT, Minor TH Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 781 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 801 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App EB L 1 781 a a > EB L 22 801 a a 912 4.0 A 4.0 815 4.5 a A 4.5 KB R 1 1096 > a > EH R 1 1315 a > a NB L 1 1344 2.7 A 0.1 NB L 1 1632 2.2 A 0.0 Intersection Delay - 0.6 Intersection Delay - 0.4 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name E01CAM.HCO Pile Name E01CPM.HC0 Streets: (N-S) ACCESS (B-W) SW 68TH PKWY Streets: (N-S) ACCESS (E-W) SW 68TH PKWY Major Street Direction.... EW Major Street Direction8W Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst RAH Analyst RAH Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Other Information EO1CAM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS AM PEAK Other Information 1101CPM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1< 0 O> 1 0 0, O. 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 0, 1 0 0 l< 0 0> 0< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 94 84 1 15 11 1 Volumes 29 15 1 90 72 1 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHF .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (%) 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors • Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 136 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 15 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1181 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1361 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1181 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1361 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street WE EB Step 2: LT from Major Street WE EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 178 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 91 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1410 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1551 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1410 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1551 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 of Queue-free State: 0.97 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 152 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 90 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 865 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 939 Major LT, Minor TH Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Impedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 864 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 914 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 16 864 , QC I > NB L 100 914 > > > > 878 4.2 A 4.2 917 4.4 A 4.4 NB R 1 1181 > , > NB R 1 1361 > > > WB L 1 1410 2.6 A 0.1 EB L 40 1551 2.4 A 1.4 Intersection Delay = 0.8 Intersection Delay - 1.8 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation RCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 RCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name FO1CAM.HCO File Name F01CPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) DUAL ACCESS (E-N) SW 68TH PINY Streets: (N-S) DUAL ACCESS (B-W) SW 68TH PKWY Major Street Direction.... BW Major Street DirectionEN Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst BAH Analyst EAH Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Other Information FO1CAM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS AM PEAR Other Information FO1CPM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection TWO-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0. 1. 0 0> 1. 0 0> 1. 0 0. 1. 0 No. Lanes 0> 1. 0 0> 1< 0 0> 1< 0 0> 1. 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 48 7 39 7 4 7 5 0 1 1 0 6 Volumes 9 13 7 2 9 1 37 0 7 5 0 44 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHF .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (%) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 26 8 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 16 10 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1343 1372 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1359 1369 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1343 1372 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1359 1369 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 0.99 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 0.96 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB BB Step 2: LT from Major Street MB BB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 46 11 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 20 10 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1630 1694 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1677 1696 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1630 1694 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1677 1696 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 0.96 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 TN Saturation Plow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 AT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 0.96 of Queue-free State: 1.00 0.99 Step 1: TH from Minor Street NB SB Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 92 108 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 38 40 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 976 957 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1042 1039 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 0.95 due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 928 910 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1033 1030 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 92 90 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 59 40 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 937 939 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 979 1004 Major LT, Minor TH Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.95 0.95 Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 0.96 due to Impeding Movements 0.95 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 896 903 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 929 990 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.TOtal Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 7 896 > > > NB L 51 929 . > > 935 { 3.9 A 3.9 980 3.9 A 3.9 NB R 1 1343 > AV, > > NB R 10 1359 > Al/ > > SB L 1 903 > Y > > SB L 7 990 > _` s 1304 2.8 A 2.8 1317 2.9 > A 2.9 SB R 9 1372 > > . SB R 61 1369 . > > BB L 70 1694 2.2 A 1.1 BB L 12 1696 2.1 A 0.7 WE L 10 1630 2.2 A 0.9 MB L 3 1677 2.2 A 0.4 Intersection Delay - 1.3 Intersection Delay • 2.5 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unaignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name GOICAM.HCO File Name GO1CPM.HC0 Streets: (N-S) SW 66TH AVE (E-W) SW 68TH PKWY Streets: (N-S) SW 66TH AVE (E-W) SW 68TH PKWY Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst BAH Analyst RAH Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Other Information GO1CAM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS AM PEAK Other Information G01CPM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1. 0 0> 0. 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1. 0 0> O. 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1 13 115 18 3 6 Volumes 4 50 6 8 20 5 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHF .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (5) 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCB's 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB KB Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB BB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 124 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 10 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1198 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1369 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1198 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1369 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street SS NB Step 2: LT from Major Street SE NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 133 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 14 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1482 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1688 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1482 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1688 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB RB Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB KB Conflicting Flows: )vph) 138 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 64 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 881 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 972 Major LT, Minor TH Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 880 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 968 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay PlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App KB L 4 880 . > > EB L 28 968 . > > 1078 3.4 A 3.4 1028 3.6 A 3.6 EB R 9 1198 > > > EB R 7 1369 , > > NB L 1 1482 2.4 A 0.0 NB L 6 1688 2.1 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.2 Intersection Delay - 0.8 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unaignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 Pile Name HO1CAM.HCO File Name HOICPM.HCO Streets: (N-S) SW 66TH AVE (E-N) ACCESS Streets: (N-S) SW 66TH AVE (E-W) ACCESS Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed60 (min) Analyst RAH Analyst RAH Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Date of Analysis 7/30/96 Other Information H01CAM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS AM PEAK Other Information HOICPM - 2001 COMBINED COUNTS PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 lc 0 0. Oa 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1. 0 0> 0. 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1 11 107 14 2 0 Volumes 1 42 8 3 12 0 PHF .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 .69 PHF .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 .72 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 tics (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 MC's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (5) 1 1 1 1 1 1 CV's (t) 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCE's 1 1 1 1 1 1 PCR's 1 1 1 1 1 1 Adjustment Factors Adjustment Factors • Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: PT from Minor Street WE BB Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EH Conflicting Flows: (vph) 114 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 10 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1212 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1369 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1212 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1369 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Plows: (vph) 121 Conflicting Plows: (vph) 11 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1501 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1694 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1501 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1694 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 AT Saturation Plow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Plow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WE EB Step 4: LT from Minor Street WE BB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 126 Conflicting Plows: (vph) 52 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 895 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 988 Major LT, Minor TB Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 894 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 987 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary PlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App EH L 3 894 s 894 . 4.0 s A EH L 17 987 . 987 . 3.7 • A NB L 1 1501 2.4 A 0.0 NB L 1 1694 2.1 A 0.0 Intersection Delay . 0.1 Intersection Delay . 0.6 QUEUING CALCULATIONS 4 nosm..ic1 -- 1994 WO LT Ariz: — (I - �)Y /.S X 25' - //7 1 (30/'00) r Ph(: 351 >t 2 a 2/6 5- 3/v BA-6e -260 I 1118 LT A/X: /90_ 0.2L) X iSX 25 _ /57o 1 (30c//ca) (/ - 33.5)X/Sx,25 (3600/ioo) /00 em g/ve_ 200/ we IT Am.• .2o 3 (/ %g) x/.Sx25 /73 ' 3G Fix : _ (/- 37) x /sx,:25 359 , 31' Do C wA76� �'LC to t e/VS - h4 L6FT TUIUV BY � q SW H/1' `e1c W Si /sin/ ?2 M �/r DATE -7--/3C1/ / IC MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. g9b V CIVIL• STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SHT. / OF 2- 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 ® MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1995 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED QUEUEING ANALYSIS QUEUEING ANALYSIS SW Hampton @ SW 68th Ave PM SW Hampton @ SW 68th Ave AM Northbound 2001 Combined Southbound 2001 Combined ARRIVAL RATE 542 (veh/hr) 9.0 (veh/min) ARRIVAL RATE 445 (veh/hr) 7.4 (veh/min) CAPACITY 513 (veh/hr) 8.6 (veh/min) CAPACITY 547 (veh/hr) 9.1 (veh/min) UTILIZATION FACTOR(p) 1.057 UTILIZATION FACTOR(p) 0.814 P(n)=p^n*P(0) where P(0)=1-p -0.057 P(n)=p^n•P(0) where P(0)=1-p 0.186 P(n) P(x=n)=p^n*P(0) P(x<n) P(n) P(x=n)=pAn*P(0) P(x<n) 0 -0.057 -0.057 - 0 0.186 0.186 - 1 -0.060 -0.116 - 1 0.152 0.338 - 2 -0.063 -0.179 - 2 0.123 0.462 - 3 -0.067 -0.246 - 3 0.100 0.562 - 4 -0.070 -0.316 - 4 0.082 0.644 - 5 -0.074 -0.391 - 5 0.066 0.710 - 6 -0.079 -0.470 - 6 0.054 0.764 - 7 -0.083 -0.553 - 7 0.044 ._ 0.808 - 8 -0.088 -0.640 - 8 0.036 0.844 - 9 -0.093 -0.733 - 9 0.029 0.873 - 10 -0.098 -0.831 - 10 0.024 0.897 - 11 -0.104 -0.935 - 11 0.019 0.916 - 12 -0.109 -1.044 - 12 0.016 0.932 - 13 -0.116 -1.159 - 13 0.013 0.944 - 14 -0.122 -1.282 - 14 0.010 0.955 • 15 -0.129 -1.411 - 15 0.008 0.963 * STORAGE REQ= * VEH @ 25 FEETNEH 0 FEET STORAGE REQ= 14 VEH @ 25 FEETNEH 350 FEET QUEUEING ANALYSIS QUEUEING ANALYSIS SW Hampton @ SW 68th Ave PM SW Hampton @ SW 68th Ave PM Eastbound 2001 Combined Westbound 2001 Combined ARRIVAL RATE 521 (veh/hr) 8.7 (veh/min) ARRIVAL RATE 521 (veh/hr) 8.7 (veh/min) CAPACITY 701 (veh/hr) 11.7 (veh/min) CAPACITY 368 (veh/hr) 6.1 (veh/min) UTILIZATION FACTOR(p) 0.743 UTILIZATION FACTOR(p) 1.416 P(n)=p^n•P(0) where P(0)=1-p 0.257 P(n)=p^n*P(0) where P(0)=1-p -0.416 P(n) P(x=n)=p"n*P(0) P(x<n) P(n) P(x=n)=p^n*P(0) P(x<n) 0 0.257 0.257 - 0 -0.416 -0.416 - 1 0.191 0.448 - 1 -0.589 -1.004 - 2 0.142 0.589 - 2 -0.833 -1.838 - 3 0.105 0.695 - 3 -1.180 -3.018 - 4 0.078 0.773 - 4 -1.670 -4.688 - 5 0.058 0.831 - 5 -2.365 -7.053 - 6 0.043 0.875 - 6 -3.348 - 7 0.032 0.907 - 7 -4.740 - 8 0.024 0.931 - 8 -6.711 - 9 0.018 0.949 - 9 -9.501 - 10 0.013 0.962 * 10 -13.451 - 11 0.010 0.972 * 11 -19.043 - 12 0.007 0.979 * 12 -26.960 ****• - 13 0.005 0.984 * 13 -38.169 - 14 0.004 0.988 * 14 -54.038 - 15 0.003 0.991 * 15 -76.505 - STORAGE REQ= 10 VEH @ 25 FEETNEH 250 FEET STORAGE REQ= • VEH @ 25 FEETNEH 0 FEET MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET•P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039•(503)224-9570•FAX(503)228-1285 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION PROJECT NAME: Farmers Insurance Property DATE OF CALL: 7/12/96 PROJECT#: 296044 TIME: PM PERSON: Mr. Lenny Hing PHONE#: 503.625.6177 COMPANY: Pride Disposal SUBJECT: TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURES REMARKS: Mr. Hing recommended two(2)20'-wide x 10'-deep trash/recycling areas,with one(1)on each side of 68th Parkway. Typical service is once a week with a 40'-long truck with front-end in access. Mr.Hing offered to review our placement after the locations firm up. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five(5)days of receipt. Beth Zauner BEZ/ks MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES F:IWPDATA196-07196044112RTC1.KS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL• STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET•P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039•(503)224-9560•FAX(503)228-1285 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION PROJECT NAME: Farmers Insurance Site-Tigard DATE OF CALL: 7/16/96 PROJECT #: 296044.74 TIME: 4 pm PERSON: Dave Bryson,PE,Hydraulics Engineer PHONE#: 503-986-3363 COMPANY: ODOT, Bridge Section SUBJECT: SITE DRAINAGE MODIFICATIONS REMARKS: 1. We discussed the fax sent to Mr.Bryson on 7/13/96 regarding the proposed changes to the drainage in the area of this project. Both the fax and exhibit are attached to this document. 2. Mr. Bryson reviewed ODOT record documents and indicated the following: A. The 24-inch storm drain runs directly into an 84-inch storm drain for Bull Creek which runs under the interchange. B. The 18-inch storm drain outlets 400 feet above the 84-inch for Bull Creek and runs directly into the 84- inch in a ditch. C. Mr. Bryson does not see timing as a problem because the runs are so short. We would not have to consider time of concentration lags in our calculations. D. For the 24-and 18-inch storm drains: 1. No record drawings indicating flow lines exist 2. No hydraulic analysis records exist E. Design criteria: 1. Mr. Bryson indicated that we do not need to analyze the existing capacity of the existing 18-,24-, and 84-inch storm drains. 2. We need to limit peak discharge to the storm drains to the undeveloped 50-year design storm event. F. Submittals and design approval: 1. We discussed the ODOT permit process as it has recently been clarified with the help of Mr. Bryson,Ms. Sue Chase, and Mr. Jim Doherty. 2. Mr. Bryson and I agreed to discuss the project after the first design draft and I agreed to notify him when the project was submitted through the District 2A office for review. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five(5)days of receipt. 'AP Timothy '. Echeverria TPE/sk Attachments c: Conversant Mark Edlen,Vern Rifer-Gerding/Edlen Development Co. Rick Saito-MSA Dave Larson-MEI F.\W PDATA196-07\96044\16RTC 1.S K Ml - 7NZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, Ai .:cture • Planning • Interior Design_ (503) 224-9570 • FAX (503)228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Transportation (503) 224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201-0039 FAX COVER SHEET Date: July 13, 1996 Project Number: 296044 Please deliver the following pages immediately to: Company: ODOT,Bridge Section Attention: Dave Bryson, PE FAX: 503-986-3407 Project Name: Farmers Insurance Site-Tigard From: Timothy P. Echeverria I thought I would help with the phone tag and fax you a picture of my request. The survey information I have indicates that Al and some of A2 as shown on the attached Exhibit A drain into the 18 inch storm drain. Most of A2 and the surrounding lea drain into the 24 inch storm drain. Both storm drains pick up some of the I5 drainage as well as 66th. In order to meet the water quality treatment requirements as well as detain the difference in 50 year storms as previously discussed,we would like to consider changing the drainage pattern in the area. The developer is considering obtaining the land marked as the proposed detention pond area on the exhibit. We believe this area to be of sufficient size to provide water quality treatment and detention for both areas Al and A2. If the discharge of the existing 18 inch and 24 inch storm drains ends up at the same place, we could oversize the detention area to lag the Al drainage so that the net downstream effect of the discharge was the'same. .. Please call late Monday afternoon or early Tuesday morning to discuss this possiblity. Tim Total Number of Pages (including this cover sheet): 2 If you did not receive all pages, please call our Records Department. ORIGINAL WILL /WILL NOT x FOLLOW BY MAIL. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this facsimile transmission is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,this serves as notification that any reading, disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If this transmission was received in error, immediately notify us at 503/224-9570 to arrange for return of the original facsimile. Internal Use Only: File Sender I WP Department 6 \ I . il .. )N . . Ii '\ . \,.‘ A \-": ! • . .,\.5_,, , , 41...... pZe). . ‘ ‘ ?\' \\, .4404 -.14? rOZNIGS _ /- e_itne7s mis s/7- Tizfee Z96celi ei 0 to gzft --; 14/6312,4 GO/Pv MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL. • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET•P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 9720 1-003 9 •(503)224-9560•FAX(503)228-1285 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION PROJECT NAME: Farmers Insurance Site DATE OF CALL: 6/4/96 PROJECT#: 296044 TIME: PERSON: Brian Rager PHONE#: 639-4171 COMPANY: City of Tigard SUBJECT: CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REMARKS: Thank you for returning my call on this matter. Pursuant to our conversation, financial decisions and preliminary design will be based upon the following: 1. During our discussion of storm drain detention requirements for the above referenced site,you indicated that satisfying ODOT requirements would be sufficient since the storm drainage in the area goes directly into the ODOT right-of-way. 2. We discussed the various potential impacts on 66th from ODOT. In addition to the guidance you provided during our meeting of 16 May 1996,you indicated that the developer could rely on ODOT to work with the city to reconstruct 66th if the development did not exceed the current capacity of 66th. If the development required a capacity that exceeded the current effective capacity of 66th the city may require the developer to improve 66th to the needed capacity at the time of development. 3. Crossing the public right-of-way of 68th Parkway with a private storm drain pipe would not be allowed. All utilities occupying the public right-of-way must meet public standards. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five(5)days of receipt. Tim Echeverria /TPE/ks c: Mark Edlen MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED F:IWPDATA\96-06196044\04RTC1.KS MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED CIVIL • STRUCTURAL• TRANSPORTATION 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET•P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039•(503)2249560•FAX(503)228-1285 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION PROJECT NAME: Farmers Insurance Site DATE OF CALL: 5/30/96 PROJECT#: 296044 TIME: PERSON: Dave Bryson PHONE #: COMPANY: Oregon Department of Transportation .Y...... .:.tiw:r,'<`u}:2:by's;4{: `{Ac:�i.:'; a 'r•`: i£ '':c 5f'.':: ,`?•,';:'o-%%�:`:i .'f•.F<5:;:�r:::,?ft'i.ri:3R:�.,. t`z._.:.`••.. .:• t. y.k.:K`,T,,%,2, .•t,,`,it,,S,e.,`.":.� :'..,";tix•+:: SUBJECT: Storm Drainage esign Criteria REMARKS: During our conversation, Dave indicated the following: 1. The maximum discharge to the ODOT storm drainage system in the area is the runoff generated by the 50-year storm on the undeveloped site. The difference between the 50- year developed and the 50-year undeveloped must be detained on site. 2. ODOT does not require pretreatment, only detention as described above. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five (5) days of receipt. Karl Koroch, P.E. TPE:KK/kc c: Conversants Mark Edlen - Gerding/Edlen Development Company Tim Echeverrla-Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated F:\WPDATA\96-0519604\3ORTCI.KC 1\1 or SW GK-14 f T2LA = 5,4. 1 He I A l'S7JN6- CN PERUIouc = 5,6/ Ac g6 9-1 ET S H4 11 O W 6-2 L = 2So ' s- 2`7,. L= 2so" P5 = 2,90 Py _ '1 o0 P$o LI,so PEVELOPED CN PEgutous = o.f?tl Ac S'6 IMPE-2V(CUS = 177 ,t 9k t� = S4EGT .SHEET PFC.- r - 0.2 yz C),Olt S= 2% L . 20' L= loo' L = 500 5,-- 2% S - 2% W.-Q. VOL = 0.36 l:, X 1L K N,77Ac x ��f5 Z = ��33 . 3 12 r� 1�ETEN T/OA/ VOG- Z7 S/5 �O = 17, 11,3 -rf 3 C .�T Tv T n c Pow) vvc. .6-°/51) 6P-7.- 3 = I 066 -Ft-3 /'n �! 3 BY r / DATE 6/3/q6, - - MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. /2�16U�1'// CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SHT. i OF 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 1996 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED File dAta Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool Mackenzie Engineering Inc 2888866686e8666686 ; 3e6666eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee66688668666e6e6666666666666eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeei O ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE 0 O MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT 0 O DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No . No. STG OUT HYD 0 O 0 °50-50 2 . 73 5 . 04 A B 101 . 27 2 . 74 6 0 025-5 1 . 34 4 .44 A A 102 .48 1 . 34 5 0 050 THROUGH POND 2 . 73 5 . 04 A A 102 . 94 1 . 43 7 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O >Done< Press any key to exit 0 A6666666868666666666eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee6668688868866666eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Available Memory remaining: 44160 bytes Current Data Set Name : c : \DWG\WORK\FARMERS\NORTH 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 1 N012TH OF SW 604' f4' BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D25 NAME: DEVELOPED 25YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 84 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 6 . 85 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 4 . 77 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 .30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 500 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 4 .44 cfs VOL: 1 . 67 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: D50 NAME: DEVELOPED 50YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 4 . 50 inches AREA. . : 0 . 84 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 6 . 85 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 4 . 77 Acres CN 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns : 0 .2000 p2yr: 2 .30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 30 s: 0 . 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 500 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s :0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 5 . 04 cfs VOL: 1 . 91 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: E5 NAME: EXIST. 5YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 5 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 5 . 61 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 33 .23 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 .30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 250 . 00 ks : 10 . 00 s :0. 0200 PEAK RATE: 1 . 34 cfs VOL: 0 . 74 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 2 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E50 NAME: EXIST. 50 YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 50 inches AREA. . : 5 .61 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 33 .23 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 .2000 p2yr: 2 .30 s: 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 250 . 00 ks : 10 . 00 s :0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 2 . 73 cfs VOL: 1 .40 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 3 ROUTING REPORT TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. A Description: Length: 75 . 00 ft . Width: 50 .00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 4 Side Slope 3 : 4 Side Slope 2 : 4 Side Slope 4 : 4 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. B Description: Outlet Elev: 99 . 00 Elev: 99 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 8 . 1797 in. ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 99.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100.70 2877 2.3673 11.95 102.40 12175 3.3479 43.931 c .`►V 15-5 99.10 0.0000 0.5742 0.5742 100.80 3331 2.4360 13. .50 12833 3.3968 46.175 99.20 0.0000 0.8120 0.8120 100.90 3796 2.5027 15.155 102.60 13505 3.4450 48.461 99.30 0.0000 0.9945 0.9945 101.00 4271 2.5677 16.806 102.70 14190 3.4925 50.792 99.40 0.0000 1.1483 1.1483 101.10 4758 2.6311 18.492 102.80 14888 3.5394 53.167 99.50 0.0000 1.2839 1.283 0) 7 101.2 SO 5257 2.6931 20.216 102.90 15600 3.5856 55.587 99.60 0.0000 1.4064 1.4064 1 .30 5767 2.7536 21.976 103.00 16326 3.6313 58.051 99.70 0.0000 1.5191 1.5191 101.40 6289 2.8128 23.775 103.10 17066 3.6764 60.562 99.80 0.0000 1.6240 1.6240 101.50 6822 2.8708 25.611 103.20 17819 3.7210 63.118 99.90 0.0000 1.7225 1.7225 101.60 7367 2.9277 27.486 103.30 18587 3.7650 65.721 100.00 0.0000 1.8157 1.8157 101.70 7925 2.9834 29.399 103.40 19368 3.8086 68.370 100.10 380.02 1.9043 3.1710 101.80 8494 3.0382 31.353 103.50 20165 3.8516 71.067 100.20 770.17 1.9890 4.5562 101.90 9076 3.0920 33.346 103.60 20975 3.8942 73.812 100.30 1171 2.0702 5.9721 102.00 9671 3.1448 35.380 103.70 21801 3.9363 76.605 100.40 1581 2.1483 7.4195 102.10 10278 3.1968 37.455 103.80 22641 3.9779 79.447 100.50 2003 2.2237 8.8993 102.20 10897 3.2480 39.572 103.90 23495 4.0191 82.337 100.60 2435 2.2967 10.412 102.30 11530 3.2983 41.730 3 0ETF-NT/uA1 VOL = 12, c33 -C-1- 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 4 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 50-50 MATCH Q (cfs) 2 .73 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 5 . 04 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 101 .27 PEAK OUTFLOW 2 .74 PEAK TIME : 510 . 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 4 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 6 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 12 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0010 0 . 0000 0 . 0010 0 . 0000 0 . 0010 99 . 00 30 . 00 O . 0010 0 . 0199 0 . 0000 0 . 0210 0 . 0010 0 . 0199 99 . 00 40 . 00 0 . 0199 0 . 0623 0 . 0000 0 . 0822 0 .0199 0 . 0623 99 . 00 50 . 00 0 . 0623 0 . 1063 0 . 0000 0 . 1686 0 . 0623 0 . 1063 99 . 00 60 . 00 0 . 1063 0 . 1833 0 . 0000 0 . 2896 0 . 1063 0 . 1833 99 . 00 70 . 00 0 . 1833 0 .2745 0 . 0000 0 .4578 0 . 1833 0 . 2745 99 . 00 80 . 00 O .2745 0 .3328 0 . 0000 0 . 6073 0 .2745 0 .3328 99 . 00 90 . 00 0 .3328 0 . 3770 0 . 0000 0 . 7098 0 .3328 0 .3770 99 . 00 100 . 00 0 . 3770 0 .4123 0 . 0000 0 . 7893 0 .3770 0 .4123 99 . 00 110 . 00 O .4123 0 .4411 0 . 0000 0 . 8534 0 .4123 0 .4411 99 . 00 120 . 00 0 .4411 0 .4980 0 . 0000 0 . 9391 0 .4411 0 .4980 100 . 00 130 . 00 0 .4980 0 . 5629 0 . 0000 1 . 0609 0 .4980 0 . 5629 100 . 00 140 . 00 0 . 5629 0 . 5910 0 . 0000 1 . 1539 0 . 5629 0 . 5910 100 . 00 150 . 00 O . 5910 0 .6062 0 . 0000 1 . 1972 0 .5910 0 . 6062 100 . 00 160 . 00 0 . 6062 0 . 6269 0 . 0000 1 .2331 0 .6062 0 . 6269 100 . 00 170 . 00 0 . 6269 0 . 6439 0 . 0000 1 . 2708 0 . 6269 0 . 6439 100 . 00 180 . 00 0 . 6439 0 . 6545 0 . 0000 1 . 2983 0 . 6439 0 . 6545 100 . 00 190 . 00 0 . 6545 0 . 6722 0 . 0000 1. 3267 0 .6545 0 . 6722 100 . 00 200 . 00 0 . 6722 0 . 6850 0 . 0000 1 . 3572 0 . 6722 0 . 6850 100 . 00 210 . 00 0 . 6850 0 . 6911 0 . 0000 1 . 3761 0 .6850 0 . 6911 100 . 00 220 . 00 0 . 6911 0 . 7053 0 . 0000 1 . 3965 0 .6911 0 . 7053 100 . 00 230 . 00 0 . 7053 0 . 7150 0 . 0000 1 .4204 0 .7053 0 . 7150 100 . 00 240 . 00 0 . 7150 0 . 7658 0 . 0000 1 .4808 0 .7150 0 .7658 100 . 00 250 . 00 0 . 7658 0 . 8231 0 . 0000 1 . 5888 0 .7658 0 . 8231 100 . 00 260 . 00 0 . 8231 0 . 8394 0 . 0000 1 . 6625 0 . 8231 0 . 8394 100 . 00 270 . 00 0 . 8394 0 . 8541 0 . 0000 1 . 6936 0 .8394 0 . 8541 100 . 00 280 . 00 0 . 8541 0 . 8573 0 . 0000 1 . 7114 0 .8541 0 . 8573 100 . 00 290 . 00 0 . 8573 0 . 8635 0 . 0000 1. 7208 0 . 8573 0 . 8635 100 . 00 300 . 00 0 . 8635 1 . 0593 0 . 0000 1 . 9228 0 .8635 1. 0593 100 . 00 310 . 00 1 . 0593 1. 2815 0 . 0000 2 . 3408 1 . 0593 1.2815 100 . 00 320 . 00 1 . 2815 1 . 3260 0 . 0000 2 . 6075 1 .2815 1.3260 100 . 00 330 . 00 1 . 3260 1 . 3419 0 . 0000 2 . 6678 1 .3260 1 .3419 100 . 00 340 . 00 1 . 3419 1 .3524 0 . 0000 2 . 6943 1 . 3419 1 .3524 100 . 00 350 . 00 1 . 3524 1 .3615 0 . 0000 2 . 7139 1 .3524 1 .3615 100 . 00 360 . 00 1 . 3615 1 . 3232 0 . 0000 2 . 6847 1 .3615 1 .3232 100 . 00 370 . 00 1 . 3232 1 .2764 0 . 0000 2 . 5996 1 .3232 1.2764 100 . 00 380 . 00 1 .2764 1 .2682 0 . 0000 2 . 5447 1 .2764 1.2682 100 . 00 390 . 00 1 .2682 1 .2715 0 . 0000 2 . 5397 1 .2682 1.2715 100 . 00 400 . 00 1 .2715 1 .2822 0 . 0000 2 . 5537 1 .2715 1.2822 100 . 00 410 . 00 1 .2822 1 .2819 0 . 0000 2 . 5641 1 .2822 1.2819 100 . 00 420 . 00 1 .2819 1 . 9296 0 . 0000 3 .2115 1 . 2819 1. 9296 100 . 00 430 . 00 1 . 9296 2 . 6899 0 . 1065 4 .7261 1 . 8231 2 . 9030 100 . 01 440 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 5 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 2 . 6899 2 .8227 1 . 0162 6 . 5288 1. 8868 4 . 6421 100 . 08 450 . 00 2 . 8227 3 .7677 2 . 6482 9 . 2385 1. 9939 7 .2446 100 . 21 460 . 00 3 . 7677 4 .8476 5 . 1058 13 . 721 2 . 1389 11 . 582 100 . 39 470 . 00 4 . 8476 5 . 0434 9 . 2320 19 . 123 2 .3501 16 . 773 100 . 68 480 . 00 5 . 0434 3 . 8611 14 . 206 23 . 111 2 .5664 20 . 544 101 . 00 490 . 00 3 . 8611 2 .4533 17 . 840 24 . 154 2 .7044 21 .450 101 . 22 500 . 00 2 .4533 2 .2373 18 . 715 23 .405 2 . 7355 20 . 670 101 .27 510 . 00 2 . 2373 2 .1015 17 . 961 22 .300 2 .7087 19 . 591 101 . 23 520 . 00 2 . 1015 1. 9838 16 . 921 21 . 006 2 .6706 18 . 335 101 . 16 530 . 00 1 . 9838 1. 9678 15 . 710 19 . 662 2 .6252 17 . 036 101 . 09 540 . 00 1 . 9678 1.7059 14 .460 18 . 134 2 .5764 15 . 557 101 . 01 550 . 00 1 . 7059 1 .4052 13 . 039 16 . 150 2 . 5186 13 . 631 100 . 92 560 . 00 1 .4052 1.3592 11 . 191 13 . 956 2 .4398 11 . 516 100 . 81 570 . 00 1 . 3592 1.3592 9 . 1689 11 . 887 2 .3471 9 . 5402 100 . 67 580 . 00 1 . 3592 1.3538 7 . 2856 9 . 9986 2 .2546 7 . 7440 100 . 54 590 . 00 1 . 3538 1 .3539 5 . 5791 8 . 2868 2 .1649 6 . 1220 100 .42 600 . 00 1 . 3539 1 .3046 4 . 0437 6 . 7022 2 . 0783 4 . 6239 100 . 31 610 . 00 1 . 3046 1.2477 2 . 6311 5 . 1834 1. 9928 3 . 1906 100 . 20 620 . 00 1 . 2477 1 .2394 1 . 2851 3 . 7722 1. 9055 1. 8667 100 . 10 630 . 00 1 . 2394 1 .2325 0 . 0477 2 . 5197 1.8190 0 . 7007 100 . 00 640 . 00 1 . 2325 1 .2383 0 . 0000 2 .4708 0.7007 1. 7701 100 . 00 650 . 00 1 . 2383 1 . 2398 0 . 0000 2 .4781 1.7701 0 . 7079 100 . 00 660 . 00 1 . 2398 1 .1339 0 . 0000 2 . 3737 0.7079 1. 6658 100 . 00 670 . 00 1 . 1339 1 .0112 0 . 0000 2 . 1451 1. 6658 0 .4793 100 . 00 680 . 00 1 . 0112 0 .9924 0 . 0000 2 . 0036 0.4793 1 . 5243 100 . 00 690 . 00 0 . 9924 0 . 9961 0 . 0000 1 . 9885 1. 5243 0 .4642 100 . 00 700 . 00 0 . 9961 0 . 9907 0 . 0000 1 . 9868 0.4642 1. 5226 100 . 00 710 . 00 0 . 9907 0 . 9902 0 . 0000 1 . 9809 1.5226 0 .4584 100 . 00 720 . 00 0 . 9902 0 . 9967 0 . 0000 1 . 9869 0.4584 1. 5286 100 . 00 730 . 00 0 . 9967 0 . 9918 0 . 0000 1 . 9885 1.5286 0 .4599 100 . 00 740 . 00 0 . 9918 0 . 9913 0 . 0000 1 . 9831 0.4599 1. 5231 100 . 00 750 . 00 0 . 9913 0 . 9978 0 . 0000 1 . 9891 1. 5231 0 .4660 100 . 00 760 . 00 0 . 9978 0 . 9928 0 . 0000 1 . 9906 0 .4660 1. 5247 100 . 00 770 . 00 0 . 9928 0 . 9923 0 . 0000 1 . 9851 1.5247 0 .4605 100 . 00 780 . 00 0 . 9923 0 .8917 0 . 0000 1 . 8840 0.4605 1.4235 100 . 00 790 . 00 0 . 8917 0 .7691 0 . 0000 1 . 6608 1.4235 0 .2372 100 . 00 800 . 00 0 . 7691 0 . 7501 0 . 0000 1 . 5192 0.2372 1.2820 100 . 00 810 .00 0 . 7501 0. 7473 0 . 0000 1 .4975 1.2820 0 .2155 100 . 00 820 .00 0 . 7473 0 . 7470 0 . 0000 1 .4944 0 .2155 1 .2789 100 . 00 830 .00 0 . 7470 0 . 7471 0 . 0000 1 .4942 1.2789 0 .2153 100 . 00 840 .00 0 . 7471 0 . 7978 0 . 0000 1 . 5449 0 .2153 1 . 3296 100 . 00 850 . 00 0 . 7978 0 . 8626 0 . 0000 1 . 6604 1.3296 0 . 3308 100 . 00 860 . 00 0 . 8626 0 . 8729 0 . 0000 1 . 7355 0 .3308 1 . 4048 100 . 00 870 . 00 0 . 8729 0 . 8684 0 . 0000 1 . 7413 1.4048 0 .3365 100 . 00 880 . 00 0 . 8684 0 . 8742 0 . 0000 1 . 7426 0.3365 1 .4060 100 . 00 890 . 00 0 . 8742 0 . 8753 0 . 0000 1 . 7494 1.4060 0 .3434 100 . 00 900 . 00 0 . 8753 0 .8693 0 . 0000 1 . 7445 0.3434 1.4011 100 . 00 910 . 00 0 . 8693 0 . 8748 0 . 0000 1 . 7441 1.4011 0 .3430 100 . 00 920 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 6 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 8748 0 . 8759 0 . 0000 1 . 7507 0 .3430 1 .4077 100 . 00 930 . 00 0 . 8759 0 . 8699 0 . 0000 1 . 7457 1 .4077 0 . 3380 100 . 00 940 . 00 0 . 8699 0 . 8754 0 . 0000 1 . 7453 0 .3380 1 .4073 100 . 00 950 . 00 0 . 8754 0 . 8764 0 . 0000 1 . 7519 1 .4073 0 . 3446 100 . 00 960 . 00 0 . 8764 0 . 7123 0 . 0000 1 . 5887 0 .3446 1 . 2441 100 . 00 970 . 00 0 . 7123 0 . 5349 0 . 0000 1 . 2472 1 .2441 0 . 0031 100 . 00 980 . 00 0 . 5349 0 . 5073 0 . 0000 1 . 0422 0 .0031 1 . 0392 100 . 00 990 . 00 0 . 5073 0 .4967 0 . 0000 1 . 0041 1.0392 -0 . 0351 100 . 00 1000 . 00 O .4967 0 . 5015 -0 . 0351 0 . 9631 0 .0000 0 . 9631 100 . 00 1010 . 00 0 . 5015 0 .5023 0 . 0000 1 . 0037 0 . 9631 0 . 0406 100 . 00 1020 . 00 0 . 5023 0 . 6037 0 . 0000 1 . 1060 0 .0406 1 . 0654 100 . 00 1030 . 00 0 . 6037 0 .7273 0 . 0000 1 . 3310 1. 0654 0 . 2656 100 . 00 1040 . 00 O . 7273 0 . 7466 0 . 0000 1 .4739 0 .2656 1 . 2082 100 . 00 1050 . 00 0 . 7466 0 . 7497 0 . 0000 1 .4964 1.2082 0 .2881 100 . 00 1060 . 00 0 . 7497 0 .7503 0 . 0000 1 . 5001 0 .2881 1 . 2120 100 . 00 1070 . 00 0 . 7503 0 . 7505 0 . 0000 1 . 5008 1.2120 0 . 2889 100 . 00 1080 . 00 O . 7505 0 . 6999 0 . 0000 1.4505 0 .2889 1 . 1616 100 . 00 1090 . 00 0 . 6999 0 . 6351 0 . 0000 1. 3351 1.1616 0 . 1735 100 . 00 1100 . 00 0 .6351 0 .6251 0 . 0000 1.2602 0 .1735 1 . 0867 100 . 00 1110 . 00 O .6251 0 . 8201 0 . 0000 1.4452 1.0867 0 . 3585 100 . 00 1120 . 00 O . 8201 0 . 6540 0 . 0000 1.4742 0 .3585 1 . 1157 100 . 00 1130 . 00 0 .6540 0 .4380 0 . 0000 1. 0921 1.1157 -0 . 0236 100 . 00 1140 . 00 O .4380 0 . 6010 -0 . 0236 1 . 0154 0 .0000 1 . 0154 100 . 00 1150 . 00 O . 6010 0 . 6201 0 . 0000 1 .2210 1.0154 0 . 2057 100 . 00 1160 . 00 0 . 6201 0 . 6231 0 . 0000 1. 2432 0 .2057 1 . 0375 100 . 00 1170 . 00 O . 6231 0 . 6300 0 . 0000 1 .2531 1.0375 0 . 2156 100 . 00 1180 . 00 O . 6300 0 . 6248 0 . 0000 1 .2548 0 .2156 1 . 0392 100 . 00 1190 . 00 0 . 6248 0 . 6240 0 . 0000 1 . 2488 1 .0392 0 . 2096 100 . 00 1200 . 00 0 . 6240 0 .6303 0 . 0000 1 .2544 0 .2096 1 . 0447 100 . 00 1210 . 00 0 . 6303 0 . 6250 0 . 0000 1 . 2553 1.0447 0 . 2106 100 . 00 1220 . 00 . 0 . 6250 0 .6242 0 . 0000 1 . 2493 0 .2106 1 . 0386 100 . 00 1230 . 00 0 . 6242 0 .6305 0 . 0000 1 .2548 1.0386 0 . 2161 100 . 00 1240 . 00 0 . 6305 0 .6252 0 . 0000 1 .2558 0 .2161 1 . 0396 100 . 00 1250 . 00 0 . 6252 0 .6245 0 . 0000 1 .2497 1. 0396 0 .2101 100 . 00 1260 . 00 0 . 6245 0 . 6307 0 . 0000 1 .2552 0 .2101 1 . 0451 100 . 00 1270 . 00 0 . 6307 0 .6254 0 . 0000 1 .2562 1 .0451 0 .2110 100 . 00 1280 . 00 0 . 6254 0 . 6247 0 . 0000 1 .2501 0 .2110 1 . 0391 100 . 00 1290 . 00 0 . 6247 0 . 6309 0 . 0000 1 .2556 1 .0391 0 .2165 100 . 00 1300 . 00 0 . 6309 0 . 6256 0 . 0000 1 .2566 0 .2165 1. 0400 100 . 00 1310 . 00 0 . 6256 0 . 6248 0 . 0000 1 . 2505 1. 0400 0 .2104 100 . 00 1320 . 00 0 . 6248 0 . 5739 0 . 0000 1 . 1988 0 .2104 0 . 9883 100 . 00 1330 . 00 0 . 5739 0 . 5152 0 . 0000 1 . 0892 0 . 9883 0 . 1008 100 . 00 1340 . 00 0 . 5152 0 . 5061 0 . 0000 1 . 0213 0 . 1008 0 . 9205 100 . 00 1350 . 00 0 .5061 0 .4983 0 . 0000 1 . 0044 0 . 9205 0 . 0840 100 . 00 1360 . 00 0 .4983 0 . 5035 0 . 0000 1 . 0019 0 . 0840 0 . 9179 100 . 00 1370 . 00 0 . 5035 0 . 5044 0 . 0000 1 . 0079 0 .9179 0 . 0900 100 . 00 1380 . 00 0 .5044 0 .4982 0 . 0000 1 . 0025 0 . 0900 0 . 9126 100 . 00 1390 . 00 0 .4982 0 . 5036 0 . 0000 1 . 0018 0 .9126 0 . 0892 100 . 00 1400 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 7 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) O . 5036 0 . 5045 0 . 0000 1 . 0081 0 .0892 0 . 9189 100 . 00 1410 . 00 0 . 5045 0 .4983 0 . 0000 1 . 0028 0 .9189 0 . 0839 100 . 00 1420 . 00 0 .4983 0 . 5037 0 . 0000 1 . 0020 0 .0839 0 . 9181 100 . 00 1430 . 00 0 . 5037 0 . 5046 0 . 0000 1 . 0083 0 . 9181 0 . 0902 100 . 00 1440 . 00 O . 5046 0 . 2885 0 . 0000 0 . 7931 0 .0902 0 . 7029 100 . 00 1450 . 00 0 .2885 0 . 0450 0 . 0000 0 .3335 0 .7029 -0 . 3694 100 . 00 1460 . 00 0 . 0450 0 . 0070 -0 .3694 -0 .3174 0 .0000 -0 . 3174 100 . 00 1470 . 00 0 . 0070 0 . 0011 -0 .3174 -0 . 3093 0 .0000 -0 .3093 100 . 00 1480 . 00 O . 0011 0 . 0002 -0 .3093 -0 .3081 0 .0000 -0 . 3081 100 . 00 1490 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 8 ROUTING REPORT TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. A Description: Length: 75 . 00 ft . Width: 50 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 4 Side Slope 3 : 4 Side Slope 2 : 4 Side Slope 4 : 4 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. A Description: Outlet Elev: 99 . 00 Elev: 99 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 5 . 1445 in. ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 99.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 100.70 2877 0.9364 10.527 102.40 12175 1.3243 41.907 99.10 0.0000 0.2271 0.2271 100.80 3331 0.9636 12.067 102.50 12833 1.3437 44.121 99.20 0.0000 0.3212 0.3212 100.90 3796 0.9900 13.642 102.60 13505 1.3627 46.379 99.30 0.0000 0.3934 0.3934 101.00 4271 1.0157 15.253 102.70 14190 1.3815 48.681 99.40 0.0000 0.4542 0.4542 101.10 4758 1.0408 16.902 102.80 14888 1.4001 51.028 99.50 0.0000 0.5079 0.5079 101.20 5257 1.0653 18.588 102.90 15600 1.4184 53.419 99.60 0.0000 0.5563 0.5563 101.30 5767 1.0892 20.312 103.00 16326 1.4364 55.856 99.70 0.0000 0.6009 0.6009 101.40 6289 1.1127 22.074 103.10 17066 1.4543 58.339 99.80 0.0000 0.6424 0.6424 101.50 6822 1.1356 23.876 103.20 17819 1.4719 60.869 99.90 0.0000 0.6814 0.6814 101.60 7367 1.1581 25.716 103.30 18587 1.4893 63.445 100.00 0.0000 0.7182 0.7182 101.70 7925 1.1801 27.596 103.40 19368 1.5065 66.068 100.10 380.02 0.7533 2.0200 101.80 8494 1.2018 29.517 103.50 20165 1.5236 68.739 100.20 770.17 0.7868 3.3540 101.90 9076 1.2231 31.477 103.60 20975 1.5404 71.458 100.30 1171 0.8189 4.7208 102.00 9671 1.2440 33.480 103.70 21801 1.5571 74.226 100.40 1581 0.8498 6.1210 102.10 10278 1.2645 35.523 103.80 22641 1.5735 77.042 100.50 2003 0.8796 7.5552 102.20 10897 1.2848 37.609 103.90 23495 1.5898 79.908 100.60 2435 0.9085 9.0238 102.30 11530 1.3047 39.737 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 9 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 25-5 MATCH Q (cfs) 1 . 34 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 4 .44 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 102 .48 PEAK OUTFLOW 1 .34 PEAK TIME: 570 . 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 3 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 5 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0086 0 . 0000 0 . 0086 0 . 0000 0 . 0086 99 . 00 40 . 00 O . 0086 0 . 0371 0 . 0000 0 . 0457 0 . 0086 0 . 0371 99 . 00 50 . 00 0 . 0371 0 . 0740 0 . 0000 0 . 1111 0 . 0371 0 . 0740 100 . 00 60 . 00 0 . 0740 0 . 1378 0 . 0000 0 . 2119 0 . 0740 0 . 1378 100 . 00 70 . 00 O . 1378 0 .2142 0 . 0000 0 . 3521 0 . 1378 0 .2142 100 . 00 80 . 00 O . 2142 0 .2664 0 . 0000 0 .4807 0 .2142 0 .2664 100 . 00 90 . 00 O . 2664 0 . 3071 0 . 0000 0 . 5736 0 .2664 0 .3071 100 . 00 100 . 00 0 . 3071 0 .3402 0 . 0000 0 . 6473 0 .3071 0 .3402 100 . 00 110 . 00 0 . 3402 0 .3674 0 . 0000 0 . 7076 0 .3402 0 . 3674 100 . 00 120 . 00 0 . 3674 0 .4183 0 . 0000 0 . 7857 0 .3674 0 .4183 100 . 00 130 . 00 0 .4183 0 .4758 0 . 0000 0 . 8941 0 .4183 0 .4758 100 . 00 140 . 00 0 .4758 0 . 5024 0 . 0000 0 . 9783 0 .4758 0 . 5024 100 . 00 150 . 00 0 . 5024 0 . 5177 0 . 0000 1 . 0201 0 .5024 0 . 5177 100 . 00 160 . 00 0 . 5177 0 . 5366 0 . 0000 1 . 0543 0 .5177 0 . 5366 100 . 00 170 . 00 0 .5366 0 . 5506 0 . 0000 1 . 0872 0 .5366 0 . 5506 100 . 00 180 . 00 0 . 5506 0 . 5597 0 . 0000 1 . 1103 0 .5506 0 .5597 100 . 00 190 . 00 0 . 5597 0 . 5760 0 . 0000 1 . 1357 0 .5597 0 . 5760 100 . 00 200 . 00 0 . 5760 0 . 5883 0 . 0000 1 . 1642 0 .5760 0 .5883 100 . 00 210 . 00 0 . 5883 0 . 5947 0 . 0000 1 . 1829 0 .5883 0 . 5947 100 . 00 220 . 00 0 . 5947 0 . 6080 0 . 0000 1 .2027 0 . 5947 0 . 6080 100 . 00 230 . 00 0 . 6080 0 . 6173 0 . 0000 1 .2253 0 .6080 0 . 6173 100 . 00 240 . 00 0 . 6173 0 . 6621 0 . 0000 1 .2794 0 .6173 0 .6621 100 . 00 250 . 00 0 .6621 0 . 7126 0 . 0000 1 . 3747 0 .6621 0 . 7126 100 . 00 260 . 00 0 . 7126 0 . 7277 0 . 0000 1 .4404 0 . 7126 0 .7277 100 . 00 270 . 00 0 . 7277 0 . 7413 0 . 0093 1 .4783 0 .7185 0 .7599 100 . 00 280 . 00 0 . 7413 0 . 7448 0 . 0405 1 . 5267 0 .7193 0 . 8074 100 . 00 290 . 00 0 . 7448 0 . 7510 0 . 0867 1 . 5825 0 .7206 0 .8619 100 . 01 300 . 00 0 . 7510 0 . 9222 0 . 1398 1 . 8130 0 .7221 1 .0910 100 . 01 310 . 00 0 . 9222 1 . 1168 0 .3627 2 .4017 0 .7283 1 .6735 100 . 03 320 . 00 1 . 1168 1 . 1567 0 . 9295 3 . 2030 0 .7439 2 .4591 100 . 07 330 . 00 1 . 1567 1 . 1716 1 . 6948 4 . 0232 0 .7643 3 .2589 100 . 13 340 . 00 1 . 1716 1 . 1819 2 .4745 4 . 8280 0 .7844 4 .0437 100 . 19 350 . 00 1 . 1819 1 . 1907 3 . 2407 5 . 6133 0 . 8030 4 .8103 100 . 25 360 . 00 1 . 1907 1 . 1580 3 . 9895 6 . 3382 0 . 8209 5 . 5173 100 . 31 370 . 00 1 . 1580 1 . 1178 4 . 6809 6 . 9566 0 . 8365 6 .1202 100 . 36 380 . 00 1 . 1178 1 . 1112 5 . 2704 7 .4994 0 . 8498 6 .6496 100 .40 390 . 00 1 . 1112 1 . 1147 5 . 7888 8 . 0147 0 .8608 7 .1539 100 .44 400 . 00 1 . 1147 1 . 1245 6 . 2826 8 . 5219 0 . 8713 7 .6506 100 .47 410 . 00 1 . 1245 1 . 1248 6 . 7691 9 . 0184 0 .8815 8 .1369 100 . 51 420 . 00 1 . 1248 1 . 6943 7 .2459 10 . 065 0 .8911 9 .1739 100 . 54 430 . 00 1 . 6943 2 . 3632 8 . 2627 12 . 320 0 . 9113 11 .409 100 . 61 440 . 00 2 . 3632 2 .4815 10 .457 15 . 302 0 .9520 14 . 350 100 . 76 450 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 10 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 2 . 4815 3 . 3152 13 . 348 19 . 145 1 . 0013 18 . 144 100 . 94 460 . 00 3 . 3152 4 . 2687 17 . 085 24 . 669 1 . 0588 23 . 610 101 . 17 470 . 00 4 . 2687 4 .4446 22 .478 31 . 191 1 . 1322 30 . 059 101 .49 480 . 00 4 . 4446 3 .4045 28 . 851 36 . 700 1 . 2077 35 .493 101 . 83 490 . 00 3 .4045 2 . 1642 34 . 228 39 . 797 1 . 2642 38 . 533 102 . 10 500 . 00 2 . 1642 1 . 9744 37 .239 41 . 378 1 . 2934 40 . 085 102 .24 510 . 00 1 . 9744 1 . 8550 38 . 777 42 . 606 1 . 3078 41 . 298 102 .32 520 . 00 1 . 8550 1 . 7515 39 . 979 43 . 586 1 . 3188 42 . 267 102 . 37 530 . 00 1 . 7515 1 . 7377 40 . 940 44 .429 1 . 3275 43 . 101 102 .42 540 . 00 1 . 7377 1 . 5067 41 . 767 45 . 011 1 . 3347 43 . 676 102 .45 550 . 00 1 . 5067 1 .2412 42 .336 45 . 084 1 . 3398 43 . 745 102 .48 560 . 00 1 . 2412 1 . 2008 42 .404 44 . 846 1 . 3404 43 . 506 102 .48 570 . 00 1 . 2008 1 . 2010 42 . 168 44 . 569 1 . 3383 43 . 231 102 .47 580 . 00 1 . 2010 1 . 1964 41 . 895 44 . 293 1 .3359 42 . 957 102 .46 590 . 00 1 . 1964 1 . 1965 41 . 623 44 . 016 1 . 3335 42 . 683 102 .45 600 . 00 1 . 1965 1 . 1531 41 .351 43 . 701 1 .3311 42 . 370 102 .44 610 . 00 1 . 1531 1 . 1029 41 . 042 43 . 298 1 .3284 41 . 969 102 .42 620 . 00 1 . 1029 1 . 0957 40 .644 42 . 843 1 .3249 41 . 518 102 .40 630 . 00 1 . 0957 1 . 0897 40 . 197 42 . 383 1 .3208 41 . 062 102 . 38 640 . 00 1 . 0897 1 . 0949 39 .745 41. 930 1 . 3167 40 . 613 102 .36 650 . 00 1 . 0949 1 . 0963 39 .301 41 .492 1 . 3126 40 . 179 102 . 34 660 . 00 1 . 0963 1 . 0028 38 .870 40 . 970 1 .3087 39 . 661 102 . 32 670 . 00 1 . 0028 0 . 8943 38 . 357 40 .254 1 .3040 38 . 950 102 .30 680 . 00 0 . 8943 0 . 8778 37 . 653 39 .425 1 .2973 38 . 127 102 .26 690 . 00 0 . 8778 0 . 8811 36 . 838 38 . 596 1 .2896 37 .307 102 . 22 700 . 00 0 . 8811 0 . 8764 36 . 025 37 . 782 1 .2819 36 . 501 102 . 19 710 . 00 0 . 8764 0 . 8760 35 .227 36 . 979 1 .2740 35 . 705 102 . 15 720 . 00 0 . 8760 0 . 8818 34 .439 36 . 196 1 .2663 34 . 930 102 . 11 730 . 00 0 . 8818 0 . 8774 33 . 671 35 .431 1 .2586 34 . 172 102 . 07 740 . 00 0 . 8774 0 . 8771 32 . 921 34 . 676 1 .2510 33 .425 102 . 03 750 . 00 0 . 8771 0 . 8829 32 . 181 33 . 941 1 .2434 32 . 698 102 . 00 760 . 00 O . 8829 0 . 8785 31 .462 33 .223 1 .2358 31 . 988 101 . 96 770 . 00 0 . 8785 0 . 8781 30 . 759 32 . 516 1 .2284 31 . 287 101 . 93 780 . 00 0 . 8781 0 . 7891 30 . 066 31 . 734 1 .2210 30 . 513 101 . 89 790 . 00 0 . 7891 0 . 6807 29 . 300 30 . 770 1 .2126 29 . 557 101 . 85 800 . 00 O . 6807 0 . 6639 28 . 355 29 . 700 1 .2022 28 .497 101 . 80 810 . 00 O . 6639 0 . 6614 27 . 307 28 .632 1 . 1903 27 .442 101 . 75 820 . 00 0 . 6614 0 . 6612 26 .264 27 . 586 1 . 1783 26 .408 101 . 69 830 . 00 0 . 6612 0 . 6613 25 .242 26 . 564 1 . 1662 25 . 398 101 . 64 840 . 00 O . 6613 0 . 7062 24 .244 25 . 612 1 . 1542 24 .457 101 . 58 850 . 00 0 . 7062 0 . 7636 23 .315 24 . 784 1 . 1427 23 . 642 101 . 53 860 . 00 0 . 7636 0 . 7727 22 . 509 24 . 045 1 . 1326 22 . 913 101 .49 870 . 00 0 . 7727 0 . 7.688 21 . 789 23 . 331 1. 1233 22 .208 101 .45 880 . 00 0 . 7688 0 . 7739 21 . 093 22 . 636 1 .1143 21 . 522 101 .41 890 . 00 0 . 7739 0 . 7749 20 .416 21 . 965 1.1053 20 . 860 101 .37 900 . 00 0 . 7749 0 . 7696 19 . 763 21 . 308 1 . 0965 20 .211 101 .33 910 . 00 0 . 7696 0 . 7746 19 . 124 20 . 668 1 .0878 19 . 580 101 .29 920 . 00 0 . 7746 0 . 7755 18 . 501 20 . 051 1 .0791 18 . 972 101 .26 930 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 11 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 7755 0 . 7703 17 . 901 19 .447 1.0706 18 . 377 101 . 22 940 . 00 0 . 7703 0 . 7752 17 . 314 18 . 860 1. 0622 17 . 798 101 . 19 950 . 00 0 . 7752 0 . 7761 16 . 744 18 . 295 1. 0538 17 .241 101 . 15 960 . 00 O . 7761 0 . 6308 16 . 196 17 . 603 1. 0457 16 . 557 101 . 12 970 . 00 O . 6308 0 .4737 15 . 521 16 . 626 1.0355 15 . 590 101 . 08 980 . 00 0 .4737 0 .4493 14 . 569 15 .492 1. 0208 14 .472 101 . 02 990 . 00 0 .4493 0 .4399 13 .468 14 .358 1. 0032 13 . 354 100 . 95 1000 . 00 0 .4399 0 .4441 12 . 369 13 . 253 0 . 9852 12 . 268 100 . 88 1010 . 00 0 .4441 0 .4448 11 . 301 12 . 190 0 . 9670 11 . 223 100 . 81 1020 . 00 0 .4448 0 . 5347 10 .275 11 . 254 0 . 9487 10 . 305 100 . 75 1030 . 00 0 . 5347 0 . 6441 9 . 3731 10 . 552 0 . 9323 9 . 6196 100 . 69 1040 . 00 0 . 6441 0 . 6613 8 .7001 10 . 006 0 . 9196 9 . 0860 100 . 64 1050 . 00 0 . 6613 0 . 6641 8 . 1763 9 . 5018 0 . 9096 8 . 5921 100 . 60 1060 . 00 0 . 6641 0 . 6646 7 . 6921 9 . 0209 0 . 9000 8 . 1209 100 . 57 1070 . 00 0 . 6646 0 . 6648 7 . 2301 8 . 5596 0 . 8907 7 . 6688 100 . 54 1080 . 00 0 . 6648 0 . 6200 6 . 7870 8 . 0718 0 . 8819 7 . 1900 100 . 51 1090 . 00 O . 6200 0 . 5626 6 . 3180 7 . 5006 0 . 8720 6 . 6286 100 .47 1100 . 00 O . 5626 0 . 5537 5 . 7682 6 . 8846 0 . 8604 6 . 0242 100 .44 1110 . 00 0 . 5537 0 . 7265 5 . 1766 6 .4569 0 . 8477 5 . 6092 100 . 39 1120 . 00 0 . 7265 0 . 5794 4 . 7707 6 . 0767 0 . 8385 5 .2382 100 . 36 1130 . 00 O . 5794 0 . 3881 4 .4079 5 .3753 0 . 8303 4 .5450 100 . 34 1140 . 00 0 .3881 0 . 5324 3 . 7303 4 . 6508 0 . 8148 3 . 8360 100 .29 1150 . 00 0 . 5324 0 . 5494 3 . 0379 4 . 1197 0 .7981 3 .3216 100 .24 1160 . 00 0 . 5494 0 . 5521 2 . 5357 3 . 6371 0 .7860 2 . 8512 100 .20 1170 . 00 0 . 5521 0 . 5582 2 . 0770 3 . 1873 0 .7741 2 .4131 100 .16 1180 . 00 0 . 5582 0 . 5536 1 . 6500 2 . 7618 0 .7631 1 . 9986 100 . 13 1190 . 00 0 . 5536 0 .5529 1 . 2459 2 . 3524 0 .7527 1 . 5997 100 . 10 1200 . 00 0 . 5529 0 .5585 0 . 8578 1 . 9692 0.7420 1 .2273 100 . 07 1210 . 00 O . 5585 0 .5538 0 .4954 1 . 6077 0.7319 0 . 8758 100 . 04 1220 . 00 O . 5538 0 . 5532 0 . 1533 1 .2603 0.7225 0 . 5378 100 . 01 1230 . 00 O . 5532 0 . 5587 0 . 0000 1. 1119 0 .5378 0 . 5741 100 . 00 1240 . 00 0 . 5587 0 . 5540 0 . 0000 1 . 1128 0 .5741 0 . 5387 100 . 00 1250 . 00 0 . 5540 0 . 5534 0 . 0000 1 . 1074 0 . 5387 0 . 5687 100 . 00 1260 . 00 0 . 5534 0 . 5589 0 . 0000 1 . 1123 0 .5687 0 . 5436 100 . 00 1270 . 00 0 . 5589 0 . 5542 0 . 0000 1 . 1132 0 . 5436 0 . 5696 100 . 00 1280 . 00 0 . 5542 0 . 5536 0 . 0000 1 . 1078 0 . 5696 0 . 5382 100 . 00 1290 . 00 0 . 5536 0 . 5592 0 . 0000 1 . 1127 0 . 5382 0 . 5745 100 . 00 1300 . 00 0 . 5592 0 . 5544 0 . 0000 1 . 1136 0 . 5745 0 . 5391 100 . 00 1310 . 00 0 . 5544 0 . 5538 0 . 0000 1 . 1082 0 . 5391 0 . 5691 100 . 00 1320 . 00 0 . 5538 0 . 5087 0 . 0000 1 . 0624 0 . 5691 0 .4933 100 . 00 1330 . 00 0 . 5087 0 .4566 0 . 0000 0 . 9653 0 .4933 0 .4719 100 . 00 1340 . 00 0 .4566 0 .4485 0 . 0000 0 . 9052 0 .4719 0 .4332 100 . 00 1350 . 00 0 .4485 0 .4417 0 . 0000 0 . 8902 0 .4332 0 .4570 100 . 00 1360 . 00 0 .4417 0 .4463 0 . 0000 0 . 8880 0 .4570 0 .4310 100 . 00 1370 . 00 O .4463 0 .4470 0 . 0000 0 . 8933 0 .4310 0 .4624 100 . 00 1380 . 00 0 .4470 0 .4416 0 . 0000 0 . 8886 0 .4624 0 .4262 100 . 00 1390 . 00 0 .4416 0 .4464 0 . 0000 0 . 8879 0 .4262 0 .4617 100 . 00 1400 . 00 0 .4464 0 .4472 0 . 0000 0 . 8935 0 .4617 0 .4318 100 . 00 1410 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 12 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 .4472 0 .4417 0 . 0000 0 . 8888 0 .4318 0 . 4570 100 . 00 1420 . 00 0 . 4417 0 .4465 0 . 0000 0 . 8882 0 .4570 0 . 4312 100 . 00 1430 . 00 0 . 4465 0 .4473 0 . 0000 0 . 8938 0 .4312 0 . 4626 100 . 00 1440 . 00 0 . 4473 0 . 2557 0 . 0000 0 . 7030 0 .4626 0 . 2404 100 . 00 1450 . 00 0 . 2557 0 . 0399 0 . 0000 0 . 2956 0 .2404 0 . 0552 100 . 00 1460 . 00 0 . 0399 0 . 0062 0 . 0000 0 . 0461 0 . 0552 -0 . 0091 100 . 00 1470 . 00 0 . 0062 0 . 0010 -0 . 0091 -0 . 0019 0 . 0000 -0 . 0019 100 . 00 1480 . 00 SO(.*7"/1 OF SW 6214" APE!) = Ac '1,63 Fx/s7/AI6- Crl Pt 12v►o us = Li C3 g6 sHfET s uaw L-= ZSo' L = 200' S= 3.1% s = 5,0% et.= G-za 1JEUC-LUP15f1' CA) -- Pr-R u►o(,4 c = 1.-e " 0-93 c'G (cou/) /MPERVfouS = 5-45 3.70 9c' tc = SKEET SHEET P)Pr PL -2O ) : 0.07/ St: 3% 1_ 1'. 20 L .- /GC' L- 500 `/a MC, VOL = O. 3 . ,: X 1-rf x H3=s6ot = t13 12 ,» X ! I)4 1 7 71 3 O6 TFN7foN VOL : z5/5 = J5 —ff T -e.)/5-,c:) eO `T 3 TOTAL PoN 2 VOL = 94_ -Ft 3 IN, S -7 - t3 • — �� BY ef/l DATE /cf' — — MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO. . A' if CIVIL• STRUCTURAL • TRANSPORTATION SHT. / OF 0690 S.W.BANCROFT STREET • P.O.BOX 69039 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED PORTLAND,OREGON 97201-0039 • (503)224-9560 • FAX(503)228-1285 1996 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page SOu7y OF SW 6 YID' BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D25 NAME: DEVELOPED 25YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 6 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 03 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 6 . 59 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 5 . 85 Acres CN 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 500 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0300 PEAK RATE : 5 . 46 cfs VOL: 2 . 05 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: D50 NAME: DEVELOPED 25YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 6 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 50 inches AREA. . : 1 . 03 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 6 . 59 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 5 . 85 Acres CN 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 .30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 500 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0300 PEAK RATE : 6 . 20 cfs VOL: 2 . 34 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: E5 NAME: EXIST. 5YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 6 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 6 . 88 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 31 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 10 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 PEAK RATE : 1 . 67 cfs VOL: 0 . 90 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 2 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E50 NAME: EXISTING 50YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 6 . 88 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 50 inches AREA. . : 6 . 88 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 31 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 .2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 10 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 PEAK RATE: 3 .40 cfs VOL: 1 . 72 Ac-ft TIME : 490 min 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 3 ROUTING REPORT TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. A Description: Length: 75 . 00 ft . Width: 50 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 4 Side Slope 3 : 4 Side Slope 2 : 4 Side Slope 4 : 4 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. B Description: Outlet Elev: 99 . 00 Elev: 99 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 8 . 8828 in. ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 99.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 101.40 6289 3.3172 24.279 103.80 22641 4.6912 80.160 99.10 0.0000 0.6771 0.6771 /p1.S21j1.5 _50 6822 3.3856 26.126 103.90 23495 4.7398 83.058 99.20 0.0000 0.9576 0.9576 101.60 7367 3.4526 28.011 104.00 24365 4.7879 86.006 99.30 0.0000 1.1728 1.1728 101.70 7925 3.5184 29.934 104.10 25250 4.8356 89.003 99.40 0.0000 1.3542 1.3542 101.80 8494 3.5830 31.898 104.20 26151 4.8828 92.051 99.50 0.0000 1.5141 1.5141 101.90 9076 3.6464 33.901 104.30 27066 4.9295 95.150 99.60 0.0000 1.6586 1.6586 102.00 9671 3.7087 35.944 104.40 27997 4.9758 98.300 99.70 0.0000 1.7915 1.7915 102.10 10278 3.7700 38.029 104.50 28944 5.0216 101.50 99.80 0.0000 1.9152 1.9152 102.20 10897 3.8303 40.154 104.60 29907 5.0671 104.76 99.90 0.0000 2.0313 2.0313 102.30 11530 3.8897 42.322 104.70 30885 5.1121 108.06 100.00 0.0000 2.1412 2.1412 102.40 12175 3.9482 44.531 104.80 31879 5.1568 111.42 100.10 380.02 2.2457 3.5125 102.50 12833 4.0059 46.784 104.90 32890 5.2010 114.83 100.20 770.17 2.3456 4.9128 102.60 13505 4.0627 49.079 105.00 33917 5.2449 118.30 100.30 1171 2.4414 6.3433 102.70 14190 4.1187 51.418 105.10 34960 5.2884 121.82 100.40 1581 2.5335 7.8048 102.80 14888 4.1740 53.802 105.20 36020 5.3316 125.40 100.50 2003 2.6225 9.2980 --102.90254-15600'. 4.2286 56.230 105.30 37096 5.3744 129.03 100.60 2435 2.7085 10.824 103.00 16326 4.2825 58.702 105.40 38189 5.4169 132.71 100.70 2877 2.7918 12.383 103.10 17066 4.3357 61.221 105.50 39299 5.4591 136.46 100.80 3331 2.8728 13.976 103.20 17819 4.3882 63.785 105.60 40426 5.5009 140.26 100.90 3796 2.9515 15.603 103.30 18587 4.4401 66.396 105.70 41571 5.5424 144.11 101.00 4271 3.0282 17.266 103.40 19368 4.4915 69.053 105.80 42732 5.5836 148.02 101.10 4758 3.1029 18.964 103.50 20165 4.5422 71.758 105.90 43911 5.6245 152.00 101.20 5257 3.1760 20.699 103.60 20975 4.5924 74.510 101.30 5767 3.2473 22.470 103.70 21801 4.6421 77.311 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 4 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 50-50 MATCH Q (cfs) 3 .40 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 6 . 20 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 101 . 52 PEAK OUTFLOW 3 .40 PEAK TIME : 510 . 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 4 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 6 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) O . 0000 0 . 0013 0 . 0000 0 . 0013 0 . 0000 0 . 0013 99 . 00 30 . 00 O . 0013 0 . 0250 0 . 0000 0 . 0263 0 . 0013 0 . 0250 99 . 00 40 . 00 O . 0250 0 . 0776 0 . 0000 0 . 1026 0 . 0250 0 . 0776 99 . 00 50 . 00 O . 0776 0 . 1317 0 . 0000 0 .2093 0 . 0776 0 . 1317 99 . 00 60 . 00 0 . 1317 0 . 2271 0 . 0000 0 . 3588 0 . 1317 0 . 2271 99 . 00 70 . 00 O . 2271 0 . 3394 0 . 0000 0 . 5665 0 .2271 0 . 3394 99 . 00 80 . 00 0 . 3394 0 .4101 0 . 0000 0 . 7496 0 .3394 0 .4101 99 . 00 90 . 00 0 .4101 0 .4639 0 . 0000 0 . 8740 0 .4101 0 .4639 99 . 00 100 . 00 0 .4639 0 . 5068 0 . 0000 0 . 9707 0 .4639 0 .5068 99 . 00 110 . 00 O . 5068 0 . 5419 0 . 0000 1 . 0487 0 . 5068 0 . 5419 99 . 00 120 . 00 0 . 5419 0 . 6125 0 . 0000 1 . 1544 0 . 5419 0 . 6125 99 . 00 130 . 00 0 . 6125 0 . 6923 0 . 0000 1 . 3048 0 . 6125 0 . 6923 99 . 00 140 . 00 0 . 6923 0 . 7259 0 . 0000 1 .4182 0 . 6923 0 . 7259 99 . 00 150 . 00 O . 7259 0 . 7440 0 . 0000 1 .4698 0 . 7259 0 .7440 99 . 00 160 . 00 0 . 7440 0 . 7695 0 . 0000 1 . 5135 0 . 7440 0 . 7695 99 . 00 170 . 00 0 . 7695 0 . 7902 0 . 0000 1 . 5597 0 . 7695 0 . 7902 99 . 00 180 . 00 0 . 7902 0 . 8030 0 . 0000 1 . 5932 0 . 7902 0 . 8030 99 . 00 190 . 00 O . 8030 0 . 8249 0 . 0000 1 . 6280 0 . 8030 0 . 8249 99 . 00 200 . 00 0 . 8249 0 . 8405 0 . 0000 1 . 6655 0 . 8249 0 . 8405 99 . 00 210 . 00 0 . 8405 0 . 8478 0 . 0000 1 . 6883 0 . 8405 0 . 8478 99 . 00 220 . 00 O . 8478 0 . 8655 0 . 0000 1 . 7133 0 . 8478 0 . 8655 99 . 00 230 . 00 O . 8655 0 . 8772 0 . 0000 1 . 7427 0 . 8655 0 . 8772 99 . 00 240 . 00 0 . 8772 0 . 9406 0 . 0000 1 . 8178 0 . 8772 0 . 9406 99 . 00 250 . 00 0 . 9406 1 . 0112 0 . 0000 1 . 9517 0 . 9406 1 . 0112 99 . 00 260 . 00 1 . 0112 1 . 0302 0 . 0000 2 . 0413 1 . 0112 1 . 0302 99 . 00 270 . 00 1 . 0302 1 . 0480 0 . 0000 2 . 0782 1 . 0302 1 . 0480 99 . 00 280 . 00 1 . 0480 1 . 0515 0 . 0000 2 . 0995 1 . 0480 1 . 0515 99 . 00 290 . 00 1 . 0515 1 . 0592 0 . 0000 2 . 1107 1 . 0515 1 . 0592 99 . 00 300 . 00 1 . 0592 1 .3044 0 . 0000 2 . 3636 1 . 0592 1 . 3044 99 . 00 310 . 00 1 . 3044 1 . 5784 0 . 0000 2 . 8829 1 .3044 1 . 5784 99 . 00 320 . 00 1 . 5784 1 . 6283 0 . 0000 3 . 2068 1 . 5784 1 . 6283 99 . 00 330 . 00 1 . 6283 1 .6464 0 . 0000 3 . 2747 1 . 6283 1 . 6464 99 . 00 340 . 00 1 . 6464 1 . 6590 0 . 0000 3 . 3054 1 .6464 1. 6590 99 . 00 350 . 00 1 . 6590 1 . 6700 0 . 0000 3 . 3290 1 . 6590 1. 6700 99 . 00 360 . 00 1 . 6700 1 . 6217 0 . 0000 3 . 2917 1 . 6700 1 . 6217 99 . 00 370 . 00 1 . 6217 1 . 5640 0 . 0000 3 . 1857 1 .6217 1 . 5640 99 . 00 380 . 00 1 . 5640 1 . 5549 0 . 0000 3 . 1190 1 . 5640 1 . 5549 99 . 00 390 . 00 1 . 5549 1 . 5594 0 . 0000 3 . 1144 1 . 5549 1. 5594 99 . 00 400 . 00 1 . 5594 1 . 5727 0 . 0000 3 . 1322 1 . 5594 1 .5727 99 . 00 410 . 00 1 . 5727 1 . 5722 0 . 0000 3 . 1449 1 . 5727 1 . 5722 99 . 00 420 . 00 1 . 5722 2 . 3842 0 . 0000 3 . 9563 1 . 5722 2 .3842 99 . 00 430 . 00 2 . 3842 3 . 3220 0 . 2244 5 . 9306 2 . 1597 3 . 7709 100 . 02 440 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 5 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE Il I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 3 . 3220 3 .4685 1 . 5067 8 .2972 2 .2642 6 . 0331 100 . 12 450 . 00 3 .4685 4 . 6473 3 . 6125 11 .728 2 .4206 9 .3077 100 . 28 460 . 00 4 . 6473 5 . 9781 6 . 6847 17.310 2 . 6230 14 . 687 100 . 50 470 . 00 5 . 9781 6 . 1950 11 . 780 23 . 953 2 . 9072 21 . 046 100 . 84 480 . 00 6 . 1950 4 . 7043 17 . 856 28 . 755 3 . 1899 25 . 565 101 . 22 490 . 00 4 . 7043 2 . 9661 22 . 200 29. 871 3 .3648 26 . 506 101 .47 500 . 00 2 . 9661 2 . 7321 23 . 107 28 . 805 3 .3991 25 .406 101 . 52 510 . 00 2 . 7321 2 . 5719 22 . 047 27.351 3 .3589 23 . 992 101 .46 520 . 00 2 . 5719 2 .4290 20 . 686 25 . 687 3 .3061 22 . 381 101. 38 530 . 00 2 .4290 2 .4123 19 . 137 23 . 979 3 .2437 20 . 735 101 . 29 540 . 00 2 .4123 2 . 0849 17 . 557 22 . 055 3 . 1774 18 . 877 101 . 20 550 . 00 2 . 0849 1 . 7141 15 . 778 19 . 577 3 . 0991 16 .478 101 . 09 560 . 00 1 . 7141 1 . 6644 13 .486 16 . 865 2 . 9918 13 . 873 100 . 95 570 . 00 1 . 6644 1 . 6666 11 . 005 14 . 336 2 . 8675 11 .469 100 . 79 580 . 00 1 . 6666 1 . 6601 8 . 7257 12 . 052 2 . 7429 9 .3095 100 . 64 590 . 00 1 . 6601 1 . 6603 6 . 6864 10 . 007 2 . 6231 7.3837 100 . 50 600 . 00 1 . 6603 1 . 5987 4 . 8768 8 . 1357 2 . 5070 5 . 6287 100 . 37 610 . 00 1 . 5987 1 . 5284 3 . 2352 6 . 3623 2 .3935 3 . 9687 100 . 25 620 . 00 1 . 5284 1 . 5196 1 . 6905 4 . 7384 2 .2783 2 .4601 100 . 13 630 . 00 1 . 5196 1 . 5113 0 . 2946 3 .3255 2 . 1655 1. 1599 100 . 02 640 . 00 1 . 5113 1 . 5187 0 . 0000 3 . 0300 1. 1599 1 . 8701 100 . 00 650 . 00 1 . 5187 1 . 5205 0 . 0000 3 . 0393 1. 8701 1. 1691 100 . 00 660 . 00 1 . 5205 1 .3877 0 . 0000 2 . 9082 1. 1691 1.7391 100 . 00 670 . 00 1 . 3877 1 .2364 0 . 0000 2 . 6241 1.7391 0 . 8850 100 . 00 680 . 00 1 . 2364 1 . 2161 0 . 0000 2 .4524 0 . 8850 1.5674 100 . 00 690 . 00 1 . 2161 1 . 2216 0 . 0000 2 .4376 1.5674 0 . 8702 100 . 00 700 . 00 1 . 2216 1 . 2149 0 . 0000 2 .4364 0 . 8702 1.5662 100 . 00 710 . 00 1 . 2149 1 . 2143 0 . 0000 2 .4292 1.5662 0 .8630 100 . 00 720 . 00 1 . 2143 1 . 2225 0 . 0000 2 .4369 0 . 8630 1.5739 100 . 00 730 . 00 1 . 2225 1 . 2162 0 . 0000 2 .4387 1.5739 0 . 8648 100 . 00 740 . 00 1 .2162 1 . 2157 0 . 0000 2 .4319 0 . 8648 1 .5670 100 . 00 750 . 00 1 .2157 1 . 2239 0 . 0000 2 .4395 1. 5670 0 .8725 100 . 00 760 . 00 1 . 2239 1 . 2175 0 . 0000 2 .4413 0 . 8725 1 .5688 100 . 00 770 . 00 1 .2175 1 . 2169 0 . 0000 2 .4344 1 . 5688 0 . 8656 100 . 00 780 . 00 1 .2169 1 . 0908 0 . 0000 2 .3078 0 . 8656 1 .4422 100 . 00 790 . 00 1 . 0908 0 . 9395 0 . 0000 2 . 0303 1 .4422 0 . 5881 100 . 00 800 . 00 0 . 9395 0 . 9189 0 . 0000 1 . 8584 0 .5881 1 .2703 100 . 00 810 . 00 0 . 9189 0 . 9163 0 . 0000 1 . 8352 1 . 2703 0 . 5649 100 . 00 820 . 00 0 . 9163 0 . 9161 0 . 0000 1 . 8324 0 . 5649 1 .2675 100 . 00 830 . 00 0 . 9161 0 . 9163 0 . 0000 1 .8324 1 . 2675 0 . 5649 100 . 00 840 . 00 0 . 9163 0 . 9798 0 . 0000 1 . 8960 0 . 5649 1 . 3311 100 . 00 850 . 00 0 . 9798 1 . 0599 0 . 0000 2 . 0396 1 . 3311 0 . 7085 100 . 00 860 . 00 1 . 0599 1 . 0711 0 . 0000 2 . 1309 0 . 7085 1 .4224 100 . 00 870 . 00 1 . 0711 1 . 0649 0 . 0000 2 . 1360 1 .4224 0 . 7136 100 . 00 880 . 00 1 . 0649 1 . 0722 0 . 0000 2 . 1372 0 . 7136 1 .4236 100 . 00 890 . 00 1 . 0722 1 . 0734 0 . 0000 2 . 1457 1 .4236 0 . 7221 100 . 00 900 . 00 1 . 0734 1 . 0659 0 . 0000 2 . 1394 0 . 7221 1 .4173 100 . 00 910 . 00 1 . 0659 1 . 0730 0 . 0000 2 . 1389 1 .4173 0 . 7217 100 . 00 920 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 6 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 1 . 0730 1 . 0742 0 . 0000 2 . 1472 0 .7217 1 .4256 100 . 00 930 . 00 1 . 0742 1 . 0666 0 . 0000 2 . 1408 1.4256 0 . 7153 100 . 00 940 . 00 1 . 0666 1 . 0737 0 . 0000 2 . 1404 0 . 7153 1 .4251 100 . 00 950 . 00 1 . 0737 1 . 0749 0 . 0000 2 . 1486 1 .4251 0 . 7235 100 . 00 960 . 00 1 . 0749 0 . 8690 0 . 0000 1 . 9439 0 .7235 1 . 2204 100 . 00 970 . 00 0 . 8690 0 . 6506 0 . 0000 1 . 5196 1 .2204 0 . 2992 100 . 00 980 . 00 0 . 6506 0 . 6207 0 . 0000 1 . 2712 0 .2992 0 . 9720 100 . 00 990 . 00 0 . 6207 0 . 6087 0 . 0000 1 . 2294 0 . 9720 0 .2573 100 . 00 1000 . 00 0 . 6087 0 . 6151 0 . 0000 1 . 2238 0 .2573 0 . 9664 100 . 00 1010 . 00 0 . 6151 0 . 6160 0 . 0000 1 . 2310 0 . 9664 0 . 2646 100 . 00 1020 . 00 0 . 6160 0 . 7432 0 . 0000 1 . 3592 0 .2646 1 . 0945 100 . 00 1030 . 00 0 . 7432 0 . 8956 0 . 0000 1 . 6388 1 . 0945 0 . 5443 100 . 00 1040 . 00 0 . 8956 0 . 9167 0 . 0000 1 . 8123 0 .5443 1 . 2680 100 . 00 1050 . 00 0 . 9167 0 . 9197 0 . 0000 1 . 8364 1 .2680 0 . 5683 100 . 00 1060 . 00 0 . 9197 0 . 9202 0 . 0000 1 . 8399 0 .5683 1 .2716 100 . 00 1070 . 00 0 . 9202 0 . 9204 0 . 0000 1 . 8407 1 .2716 0 .5691 100 . 00 1080 . 00 0 . 9204 0 . 8570 0 . 0000 1 . 7775 0 .5691 1 .2084 100 . 00 1090 . 00 0 . 8570 0 . 7769 0 . 0000 1 . 6340 1 .2084 0 .4256 100 . 00 1100 . 00 0 . 7769 0 . 7660 0 . 0000 1 . 5430 0 .4256 1. 1174 100 . 00 1110 . 00 0 . 7660 1 . 0110 0 . 0000 1 . 7771 1 . 1174 0 . 6597 100 . 00 1120 . 00 1 . 0110 0 . 7983 0 . 0000 1 . 8093 0 .6597 1. 1497 100 . 00 1130 . 00 0 .7983 0 . 5308 0 . 0000 1 . 3291 1 . 1497 0 . 1794 100 . 00 1140 . 00 0 .5308 0 . 7406 0 . 0000 1 . 2713 0 . 1794 1. 0919 100 . 00 1150 . 00 0 . 7406 0 . 7615 0 . 0000 1 . 5020 1 . 0919 0 .4101 100 . 00 1160 . 00 0 . 7615 0 . 7644 0 . 0000 1 . 5259 0 .4101 1 . 1158 100 . 00 1170 . 00 0 . 7644 0 .7728 0 . 0000 1 . 5372 1 . 1158 0 .4215 100 . 00 1180 . 00 0 . 7728 0 .7661 0 . 0000 1 . 5389 0 .4215 1 . 1175 100 . 00 1190 . 00 0 . 7661 0 .7653 0 . 0000 1 . 5314 1 . 1175 0 .4139 100 . 00 1200 . 00 0 . 7653 0 .7732 -0 . 0000 1 . 5385 0 .4139 1. 1245 100 . 00 1210 . 00 0 . 7732 0 . 7664 0 . 0000 1 . 5396 1 .1245 0 .4150 100 . 00 1220 . 00 0 . 7664 0 .7655 0 . 0000 1 . 5319 0 .4150 1.1169 100 . 00 1230 . 00 0 . 7655 0 . 7734 0 . 0000 1 . 5390 1 . 1169 0 .4221 100 . 00 1240 . 00 0 . 7734 0 . 7666 0 . 0000 1 . 5401 0 .4221 1.1180 100 . 00 1250 . 00 0 . 7666 0 . 7658 0 . 0000 1 . 5324 1 .1180 0 .4144 100 . 00 1260 . 00 0 . 7658 0 . 7737 0 . 0000 1 . 5395 0 .4144 1. 1251 100 . 00 1270 . 00 0 . 7737 0 . 7669 0 . 0000 1 . 5406 1 .1251 0 .4155 100 . 00 1280 . 00 0 . 7669 0 . 7660 0 . 0000 1 . 5329 0 .4155 1. 1174 100 . 00 1290 . 00 0 . 7660 0 . 7739 0 . 0000 1 . 5400 1 . 1174 0 .4226 100 . 00 1300 . 00 0 . 7739 0 . 7671 0 . 0000 1 . 5411 0 .4226 1 .1185 100 . 00 1310 . 00 0 . 7671 0 . 7663 0 . 0000 1 . 5334 1 .1185 0 .4149 100 . 00 1320 . 00 0 . 7663 0 . 7025 0 . 0000 1 .4687 0 .4149 1 . 0538 100 . 00 1330 . 00 0 . 7025 0 . 6301 0 . 0000 1 . 3325 1 . 0538 0 .2787 100 . 00 1340 . 00 0 . 6301 0 . 6202 0 . 0000 1 .2502 0 .2787 0 . 9715 100 . 00 1350 . 00 0 . 6202 0 . 6109 0 . 0000 1 .2311 0 . 9715 0 .2595 100 . 00 1360 . 00 0 . 6109 0 . 6176 0 . 0000 1 .2285 0 .2595 0 . 9690 100 . 00 1370 . 00 0 . 6176 0 . 6186 0 . 0000 1 .2362 0 . 9690 0 .2672 100 . 00 1380 . 00 0 . 6186 0 . 6108 0 . 0000 1 . 2294 0 .2672 0 . 9622 100 . 00 1390 . 00 0 . 6108 0 . 6177 0 . 0000 1 . 2285 0 . 9622 0 .2664 100 . 00 1400 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 7 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) ' (min) 0 . 6177 0 . 6187 0 . 0000 1 .2365 0 .2664 0 . 9701 100 . 00 1410 .00 0 . 6187 0 . 6109 0 . 0000 1 .2297 0 . 9701 0 . 2596 100 . 00 1420 . 00 0 . 6109 0 . 6179 0 . 0000 1 .2288 0 .2596 0 . 9692 100 . 00 1430 . 00 0 . 6179 0 . 6189 0 . 0000 1 . 2367 0 . 9692 0 . 2675 100 . 00 1440 . 00 0 . 6189 0 . 3480 0 . 0000 0 . 9668 0 .2675 0 . 6993 100 . 00 1450 . 00 0 . 3480 0 . 0477 0 . 0000 0 . 3957 0 . 6993 -0 . 3036 100 . 00 1460 . 00 0 . 0477 0 . 0065 -0 .3036 -0 . 2494 0 . 0000 -0 . 2494 100 . 00 1470 . 00 0 . 0065 0 . 0009 -0 .2494 -0 . 2420 0 .0000 -0 .2420 100 . 00 1480 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 8 ROUTING REPORT TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. A Description: Length: 75 . 00 ft . Width: 50 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 4 Side Slope 3 : 4 Side Slope 2 : 4 Side Slope 4 : 4 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No . A Description: Outlet Elev: 99 . 00 Elev: 99 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 5 . 5781 in. ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+25 STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 99.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 101.40 6289 1.3081 22.270 103.80 22641 1.8499 77.319 99.10 0.0000 0.2670 0.2670 101.50 6822 1.3351 24.075 103.90 23495 1.8691 80.187 99.20 0.0000 0.3776 0.3776 101.60 7367 1.3615 25.919 104.00 24365 1.8881 83.106 99.30 0.0000 0.4625 0.4625 101.70 7925 1.3875 27.803 104.10 25250 1.9069 86.075 99.40 0.0000 0.5340 0.5340 101.80 8494 1.4129 29.728 104.20 26151 1.9255 89.094 99.50 0.0000 0.5971 0.5971 101.90 9076 1.4379 31.692 104.30 27066 1.9439 92.164 99.60 0.0000 0.6541 0.6541 102.00 9671 1.4625 33.698 104.40 27997 1.9622 95.286 99.70 0.0000 0.7065 0.7065 102.10 10278 1.4867 35.745 104.50 28944 1.9802 98.460 99.80 0.0000 0.7552 0.7552 102.20 10897 1.5105 37.834 104.60 29907 1.9982 101.69 99.90 0.0000 0.8011 0.8011 102.30 11530 1.5339 39.966 104.70 30885 2.0159 104.97 100.00 0.0000 0.8444 0.8444 102.40 12175 1.5570 42.140 104.80 31879 2.0335 108.30 100.10 380.02 0.8856 2.1523 102.50 12833 1.5797 44.357 104.90 32890 2.0510 111.68 100.20 770.17 0.9250 3.4922 102.60 13505 1.6021 46.619 105.00 33917 2.0683 115.12 100.30 1171 0.9627 4.8647 102.70 14190 1.6242 48.924 105.10 34960 2.0855 118.62 100.40 1581 0.9991 6.2703 102.80 14888 1.6460 51.274 105.20 36020 2.1025 122.17 100.50 2003 1.0342 7.7097 102.90 15600 1.6675 53.669 105.30 37096 2.1194 125.77 100.60 2435 1.0681 9.1834 103.00 16326 1.6888 56.109 105.40 38189 2.1361 129.43 100.70 2877 1.1009 10.692 103.10 17066 1.7097 58.595 105.50 39299 2.1528 133.15 100.80 3331 1.1329 12.236 103.20 17819 1.7305 61.127 105.60 40426 2.1693 136.92 100.90 3796 1.1639 13.816 103.30 18587 1.7509 63.706 105.70 41571 2.1856 140.75 101.00 4271 1.1941 15.432 103.40 19368 1.7712 66.333 105.80 42732 2.2019 144.64 101.10 4758 1.2236 17.085 103.50 20165 1.7912 69.007 105.90 43911 2.2180 148.59 101.20 5257 1.2524 18.775 103.60 20975 1.8110 71.729 101.30 5767 1.2806 20.503 103.70 21801 1.8306 74.499 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 9 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 25-5 MATCH Q (cfs) 1 . 67 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 5 .46 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 102 . 90 PEAK OUTFLOW 1 . 67 PEAK TIME : 570 . 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 3 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 5 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0108 0 . 0000 0 . 0108 0 . 0000 0 . 0108 99 . 00 40 . 00 0 . 0108 0 . 0463 0 . 0000 0 . 0571 0 . 0108 0 . 0463 99 . 00 50 . 00 0 . 0463 0 . 0919 0 . 0000 0 . 1382 0 . 0463 0 . 0919 99 . 00 60 . 00 0 . 0919 0 . 1710 0 . 0000 0 . 2629 0 . 0919 0 . 1710 99 . 00 70 . 00 0 . 1710 0 . 2651 0 . 0000 0 .4360 0 . 1710 0 . 2651 99 . 00 80 . 00 0 . 2651 0 . 3285 0 . 0000 0 . 5936 0 .2651 0 . 3285 99 . 00 90 . 00 0 . 3285 0 . 3780 0 . 0000 0 . 7065 0 .3285 0 .3780 99 . 00 100 . 00 0 . 3780 0 .4183 0 . 0000 0 . 7963 0 .3780 0 .4183 99 . 00 110 . 00 0 .4183 0 .4515 0 . 0000 0 . 8698 0 .4183 0 .4515 99 . 00 120 . 00 0 .4515 0 . 5145 0 . 0000 0 . 9660 0 .4515 0 .5145 99 . 00 130 . 00 0 . 5145 0 . 5854 0 . 0000 1 . 0998 0 . 5145 0 . 5854 99 . 00 140 . 00 0 . 5854 0 . 6171 0 . 0000 1 . 2025 0 .5854 0 . 6171 99 . 00 150 . 00 0 . 6171 0 . 6355 0 . 0000 1 .2526 0 . 6171 0 . 6355 99 . 00 160 . 00 O . 6355 0 . 6587 0 . 0000 1 . 2942 0 . 6355 0 . 6587 99 . 00 170 . 00 O . 6587 0 . 6757 0 . 0000 1 . 3344 0 . 6587 0 . 6757 99 . 00 180 . 00 0 . 6757 0 . 6867 0 . 0000 1 . 3624 0 . 6757 0 . 6867 99 . 00 190 . 00 0 . 6867 0 .7069 0 . 0000 1 . 3936 0 . 6867 0 . 7069 99 . 00 200 . 00 0 . 7069 0 . 7218 0 . 0000 1 .4287 0 .7069 0 . 7218 99 . 00 210 . 00 0 . 7218 0 . 7295 0 . 0000 1 .4514 0 .7218 0 . 7295 99 . 00 220 . 00 0 . 7295 0 . 7461 0 . 0000 1 .4756 0 .7295 0 . 7461 99 . 00 230 . 00 0 . 7461 0 . 7574 0 . 0000 1 . 5034 0 .7461 0 . 7574 99 . 00 240 . 00 O . 7574 0 . 8133 0 . 0000 1 . 5707 0 .7574 0 . 8133 99 . 00 250 . 00 0 . 8133 0 . 8755 0 . 0000 1 . 6888 0 .8133 0 . 8755 99 . 00 260 . 00 0 . 8755 0 . 8931 0 . 0302 1 . 7988 0 .8454 0 . 9534 100 . 00 270 . 00 0 . 8931 0 . 9096 0 . 1056 1 . 9084 0 .8478 1 . 0605 100 . 01 280 . 00 O . 9096 0 . 9136 0 . 2094 2 . 0326 0 .8512 1 . 1814 100 . 02 290 . 00 0 . 9136 0 . 9212 0 . 3264 2 . 1612 0 .8550 1 . 3062 100 . 03 300 . 00 0 . 9212 1 . 1357 0 .4473 2 . 5042 0 .8589 1 . 6453 100 . 04 310 . 00 1 . 1357 1 . 3756 0 . 7756 3 .2869 0 . 8696 2 .4173 100 . 06 320 . 00 1 . 3756 1 .4205 1 . 5239 4 . 3200 0 . 8934 3 .4266 100 . 12 330 . 00 1 .4205 1 .4376 2 . 5036 5 .3617 0 . 9230 4 .4386 100 . 20 340 . 00 1 .4376 1 .4498 3 .4876 6 .3750 0 . 9510 5 .4240 100 . 27 350 . 00 1 .4498 1 .4606 4 .4468 7 .3572 0 . 9772 6 .3800 100 . 34 360 . 00 1 .4606 1 .4193 5 . 3783 8 . 2582 1 . 0018 7 .2564 100 .41 370 . 00 1 .4193 1 . 3697 6 . 2333 9 . 0223 1 . 0231 7 . 9992 100 .47 380 . 00 1 . 3697 1 . 3625 6 . 9583 9 . 6905 1 . 0408 8 . 6496 100 . 52 390 . 00 1 . 3625 1 . 3671 7 . 5939 10 .323 1 . 0558 9 . 2676 100 . 56 400 . 00 1 . 3671 1 . 3794 8 . 1977 10 . 944 1 .0699 9 . 8743 100 . 61 410 . 00 1 . 3794 1 . 3795 8 . 7912 11 . 550 1. 0831 10 .467 100 . 65 420 . 00 1 . 3795 2 . 0934 9 . 3710 12 . 844 1.0960 11 . 748 100 . 69 430 . 00 2 . 0934 2 . 9186 10 . 625 15 . 637 1.1228 14 . 514 100 . 77 440 . 00 2 . 9186 3 . 0493 13 . 337 19 . 305 1 . 1770 18 . 128 100 . 94 450 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 10 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 3 . 0493 4 . 0893 16 . 887 24 . 025 1 .2414 22 . 784 101 . 16 460 . 00 4 . 0893 5 . 2642 21 .468 30 . 822 1 .3158 29 . 506 101 .43 470 . 00 5 . 2642 5 .4597 28 . 096 38 . 820 1 .4100 37 .410 101 . 79 480 . 00 5 .4597 4 . 1482 35 . 904 45 . 512 1 . 5056 44 . 006 102 . 18 490 . 00 4 . 1482 2 . 6166 42 .430 49 . 195 1 . 5761 47 . 619 102 . 48 500 . 00 2 . 6166 2 .4110 46 . 007 51 . 035 1 . 6117 49 .423 102 . 64 510 . 00 2 . 4110 2 .2702 47 . 794 52 .476 1 . 6288 50 . 847 102 . 72 520 . 00 2 .2702 2 . 1446 49 .205 53 . 620 1 . 6420 51 . 978 102 .78 530 . 00 2 . 1446 2 . 1302 50 .325 54 . 600 1 . 6523 52 . 948 102 . 83 540 . 00 2 . 1302 1 . 8414 51 .287 55 . 258 1 . 6610 53 . 597 102 . 87 550 . 00 1 . 8414 1 . 5141 51 . 930 55 . 286 1 . 6669 53 . 619 102 . 90 560 . 00 1 . 5141 1 . 4705 51 . 952 54 . 937 1 . 6671 53 . 269 102 . 90 570 . 00 1 . 4705 1 .4725 51 . 606 54 . 548 1 . 6639 52 . 885 102 . 88 580 . 00 1 . 4725 1 .4670 51 .224 54 . 164 1 . 6605 52 . 503 102 . 87 590 . 00 1 . 4670 1 .4674 50 . 846 53 . 781 1 . 6570 52 . 123 102 . 85 600 . 00 1 . 4674 1 .4130 50 .470 53 . 350 1 . 6536 51 . 697 102 . 84 610 . 00 1 .4130 1 .3510 50 . 047 52 . 811 1 . 6498 51 . 161 102 . 82 620 . 00 1 . 3510 1 .3434 49 . 516 52 . 210 1 . 6450 50 . 565 102 . 80 630 . 00 1 . 3434 1 . 3362 48 . 926 51 . 606 1 . 6394 49 . 966 102 . 77 640 . 00 1 . 3362 1 . 3429 48 .332 51 . 011 1 . 6339 49 .377 102 . 74 650 . 00 1 . 3429 1 .3445 47 . 749 50 .436 1 . 6284 48 . 808 102 . 72 660 . 00 1 . 3445 1 .2272 47 . 185 49 . 757 1 . 6231 48 . 134 102 . 69 670 . 00 1 . 2272 1 . 0935 46 . 517 48 . 838 1 . 6166 47 .221 102 . 67 680 . 00 1 . 0935 1 . 0756 45 . 613 47 . 782 1 . 6079 46 . 174 102 . 63 690 . 00 1 . 0756 1 . 0805 44 . 577 46 . 733 1 . 5977 45 . 135 102 . 58 700 . 00 1 . 0805 1 . 0746 43 . 548 45 . 703 1 . 5874 44 . 115 102 . 53 710 . 00 1 . 0746 1 . 0742 42 . 538 44 . 687 1 . 5772 43 . 110 102 .49 720 . 00 1 . 0742 1 . 0816 41 . 543 43 . 699 1 . 5669 42 .132 102 .44 730 . 00 1 . 0816 1 . 0760 40 . 575 42 . 732 1 . 5569 41 . 176 102 .40 740 . 00 1 . 0760 1 . 0756 39 . 629 41 . 780 1 . 5467 40 . 234 102 . 36 750 . 00 1 . 0756 1 . 0829 38 . 697 40 . 856 1 . 5367 39 .319 102 . 31 760 . 00 1 . 0829 1 . 0773 37 . 792 39 . 952 1 . 5268 38 .425 102 . 27 770 . 00 1 . 0773 1 . 0769 36 . 908 39 . 063 1 . 5170 37 .546 102 . 23 780 . 00 1 . 0769 0 . 9653 36 . 039 38 . 081 1 . 5072 36 . 574 102 . 19 790 . 00 0 . 9653 0 . 8315 35 . 077 36 . 874 1 .4961 35 .378 102 . 14 800 . 00 0 . 8315 0 . 8133 33 . 896 35 . 541 1 .4824 34 . 058 102 . 08 810 . 00 O . 8133 0 . 8110 32 . 591 34 . 216 1 .4668 32 . 749 102 . 02 820 . 00 0 . 8110 0 . 8109 31 .298 32 . 920 1 .4509 31 .469 101 . 95 830 . 00 0 . 8109 0 . 8110 30 . 034 31 . 656 1 .4351 30 . 221 101 . 89 840 . 00 0 . 8110 0 . 8673 28 . 802 30 .480 1.4192 29 . 061 101 . 83 850 . 00 O . 8673 0 . 9382 27 . 657 29 .462 1 .4041 28 . 058 101 . 77 860 . 00 0 . 9382 0 . 9482 26 . 667 28 . 554 1 .3908 27 . 163 101 . 71 870 . 00 0 . 9482 0 . 9428 25 . 784 27 . 675 1 . 3786 26 . 296 101 . 67 880 . 00 0 . 9428 0 . 9493 24 . 930 26 . 822 1 . 3667 25 .455 101 . 62 890 . 00 O . 9493 0 . 9504 24 . 100 26 . 000 1 . 3549 24 . 645 101 . 57 900 . 00 0 . 9504 0 . 9438 23 .302 25 . 196 1 . 3433 23 . 853 101 . 53 910 . 00 0 . 9438 0 . 9501 22 . 521 24 .415 1 . 3318 23 . 083 101 .49 920 . 00 0 . 9501 0 . 9512 21 . 763 23 . 664 1 . 3203 22 . 344 101 .45 930 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 11 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 9512 0 . 9445 21 . 034 22 . 930 1 . 3092 21 . 621 101 .40 940 . 00 0 . 9445 0 . 9508 20 .323 22 . 218 1 .2980 20 . 920 101 . 36 950 . 00 0 . 9508 0 . 9519 19 . 633 21 . 536 1 . 2871 20 . 249 101 . 32 960 . 00 0 . 9519 0 . 7696 18 . 972 20 . 694 1 .2764 19 .417 101 . 29 970 . 00 O . 7696 0 . 5761 18 . 155 19 . 500 1 .2629 18 . 237 101 . 24 980 . 00 0 . 5761 0 . 5497 16 . 994 18 . 120 1 .2433 16 . 877 101 . 17 990 . 00 0 . 5497 0 . 5391 15 . 657 16 . 746 1 .2199 15 . 526 101 . 09 1000 . 00 0 . 5391 0 . 5447 14 .330 15 .414 1 . 1958 14 . 218 101 . 01 1010 . 00 O . 5447 0 . 5456 13 . 046 14 . 137 1. 1714 12 . 965 100 . 92 1020 . 00 0 . 5456 0 . 6582 11 .818 13 . 022 1 . 1472 11 . 875 100 . 85 1030 . 00 O . 6582 0 . 7933 10 .749 12 . 201 1 . 1254 11 . 076 100 . 78 1040 . 00 0 . 7933 0 . 8119 9 . 9667 11 . 572 1. 1089 10 .463 100 . 72 1050 . 00 O . 8119 0 . 8146 9 . 3671 10 . 994 1 . 0959 9 . 8977 100 . 68 1060 . 00 0 . 8146 0 . 8151 8 . 8141 10 .444 1 . 0836 9 .3602 100 . 65 1070 . 00 0 . 8151 0 . 8153 8 . 2883 9 . 9188 1 . 0719 8 . 8469 100 . 61 1080 . 00 0 . 8153 0 . 7592 7 . 7865 9 . 3611 1 . 0603 8 .3008 100 . 58 1090 . 00 O . 7592 0 . 6883 7 . 2530 8 . 7005 1 . 0478 7 . 6527 100 . 54 1100 . 00 0 . 6883 0 . 6786 6 . 6199 7. 9868 1 . 0328 6 . 9541 100 . 50 1110 . 00 0 . 6786 0 . 8957 5 . 9383 7 . 5126 1 . 0157 6 .4969 100 .45 1120 . 00 0 . 8957 0 . 7072 5 .4923 7 . 0952 1 . 0046 6 . 0906 100 .42 1130 . 00 O . 7072 0 .4702 5 . 0961 6 . 2736 0 . 9944 5 . 2791 100 . 39 1140 . 00 0 .4702 0 . 6561 4 . 3057 5 .4320 0 . 9735 4 .4586 100 . 33 1150 . 00 0 . 6561 0 . 6746 3 . 5070 4 . 8377 0 . 9516 3 . 8862 100 . 27 1160 . 00 O . 6746 0 . 6773 2 . 9504 4 . 3023 0 . 9358 3 . 3664 100 . 23 1170 . 00 0 . 6773 0 . 6847 2 .4452 3 . 8072 0 . 9213 2 . 8859 100 . 19 1180 . 00 0 . 6847 0 . 6788 1 . 9787 3 . 3423 0 . 9072 2 .4351 100 . 15 1190 . 00 0 . 6788 0 . 6781 1 . 5412 2 . 8981 0 . 8939 2 . 0042 100 . 12 1200 . 00 0 . 6781 0 . 6851 1 . 1233 2 .4864 0 . 8809 1 . 6055 100 . 09 1210 . 00 0 . 6851 0 . 6791 0 . 7371 2 . 1013 0 .8684 1 . 2330 100 . 06 1220 . 00 0 . 6791 0 . 6783 0 . 3763 1 . 7338 0 .8566 0 . 8771 100 . 03 1230 . 00 0 . 6783 0 . 6854 0 . 0317 1. 3954 0 .8454 0 . 5500 100 . 00 1240 . 00 O . 6854 0 . 6794 0 . 0000 1 . 3647 0 . 5500 0 . 8147 100 . 00 1250 . 00 O . 6794 0 . 6786 0 . 0000 1 . 3580 0 . 8147 0 . 5433 100 . 00 1260 . 00 0 . 6786 0 . 6856 0 . 0000 1 . 3642 0 . 5433 0 . 8210 100 . 00 1270 . 00 0 . 6856 0 . 6796 0 . 0000 1 . 3652 0 .8210 0 . 5443 100 . 00 1280 . 00 0 . 6796 0 . 6789 0 . 0000 1 . 3585 0 .5443 0 . 8142 100 . 00 1290 . 00 0 . 6789 0 . 6859 0 . 0000 1. 3647 0 .8142 0 . 5505 100 . 00 1300 . 00 0 . 6859 0 . 6799 0 . 0000 1 . 3657 0 .5505 0 . 8152 100 . 00 1310 . 00 0 . 6799 0 . 6791 0 . 0000 1 . 3590 0 . 8152 0 . 5438 100 . 00 1320 . 00 0 . 6791 0 . 6226 0 . 0000 1 . 3017 0 .5438 0 . 7579 100 . 00 1330 . 00 0 . 6226 0 . 5584 0 . 0000 1 . 1810 0 .7579 0 .4231 100 . 00 1340 . 00 0 . 5584 0 . 5497 0 . 0000 1 . 1081 0 .4231 0 . 6850 100 . 00 1350 . 00 0 . 5497 0 . 5414 0 . 0000 1 . 0911 0 .6850 0 .4061 100 . 00 1360 . 00 0 . 5414 0 . 5474 0 . 0000 1 . 0888 0 .4061 0 . 6828 100 . 00 1370 . 00 0 . 5474 0 . 5483 0 . 0000 1 . 0957 0 .6828 0 .4129 100 . 00 1380 . 00 0 . 5483 0 . 5414 0 . 0000 1 . 0897 0 .4129 0 . 6767 100 . 00 1390 . 00 0 . 5414 0 . 5475 0 . 0000 1 . 0889 0 .6767 0 .4122 100 . 00 1400 . 00 0 . 5475 0 . 5484 0 . 0000 1 . 0960 0 .4122 0 . 6838 100 . 00 1410 . 00 • r 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 12 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) O . 5484 0 . 5415 0 . 0000 1 . 0899 0 . 6838 0 .4062 100 . 00 1420 . 00 0 . 5415 0 . 5477 0 . 0000 1 . 0892 0 .4062 0 .6830 100 . 00 1430 . 00 0 . 5477 0 . 5486 0 . 0000 1 . 0962 0 . 6830 0 .4132 100 . 00 1440 . 00 0 . 5486 0 . 3084 0 . 0000 0 . 8570 0 .4132 0 .4438 100 . 00 1450 . 00 O .3084 0 . 0423 0 . 0000 0 . 3507 0 .4438 -0 . 0930 100 . 00 1460 . 00 O . 0423 0 . 0058 -0 . 0930 -0 . 0450 0 .0000 -0 . 0450 100 . 00 1470 . 00 0 . 0058 0 . 0008 -0 . 0450 -0 . 0384 0 .0000 -0 . 0384 100 . 00 1480 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 1 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D25 NAME: DEVELOPED 25YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 4 . 63 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 93 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN - 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 6 . 59 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 . 70 Acres CN 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 500 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0300 PEAK RATE : 3 . 61 cfs VOL: 1 . 36 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: D50 NAME: DEVELOPED 25YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 4 . 63 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 50 inches AREA. . : 0 . 93 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 6 . 59 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 . 70 Acres CN - 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 20 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 2 .30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Channel L: 500 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s :0 . 0300 PEAK RATE: 4 . 11 cfs VOL: 1 . 55 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: E5 NAME: EXIST. 5YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 4 . 63 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 4 . 63 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 31 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 .2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 10 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 PEAK RATE: 1. 12 cfs VOL: 0 . 61 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 2 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E50 NAME: EXISTING 50YR STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 4 . 63 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION 4 . 50 inches AREA. . : 4 . 63 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC 31 . 77 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 250 . 00 ns : 0 . 2000 p2yr: 2 . 30 s : 0 . 0200 TcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks : 10 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 PEAK RATE: 2 . 29 cfs VOL: 1 . 16 Ac-ft TIME : 490 min 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 3 ROUTING REPORT TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. A Description: Length: 75 . 00 ft . Width: 50 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 4 Side Slope 3 : 4 Side Slope 2 : 4 Side Slope 4 : 4 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. B Description: Outlet Elev: 99 . 00 Elev: 99 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 7 .7344 in. ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 99.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 101.40 6289 2.5149 23.477 103.80 22641 3.5566 79.025 99.10 0.0000 0.5133 0.5133 101.50 6822 2.5667 25.307 103.90 23495 3.5934 81.912 99.20 0.0000 0.7260 0.7260 101.60 7367 2.6176 27.176 104.00 24365 3.6299 84.848 99.30 0.0000 0.8891 0.8891 101.70 7925 2.6674 29.083 104.10 25250 3.6660 87.834 99.40 0.0000 1.0267 1.0267 101.80 8494 2.7164 31.031 104.20 26151 3.7018 90.870 99.50 0.0000 1.1479 1.1479 101.90 9076 2.7645 33.019 104.30 27066 3.7372 93.958 99.60 0.0000 1.2574 1.2574z1V' 07s 2.0f 0 9671 2.8117 35.047 104.40 27997 3.7723 97.097 99.70 0.0000 1.3582 1.3582 102.10 10278 2.8582 37.117 104.50 28944 3.8071 100.29 99.80 0.0000 1.4520 1.4520 102.20 10897 2.9039 39.228 104.60 29907 3.8415 103.53 99.90 0.0000 1.5400 1.5400 102.30 11530 2.9490 41.381 104.70 30885 3.8757 106.83 100.00 0.0000 1.6234 1.6234 102.40 12175 2.9933 43.576 104.80 31879 3.9095 110.17 100.10 380.02 1.7026 2.9693 102.50 12833 3.0370 45.815 104.90 32890 3.9431 113.58 100.20 770.17 1.7783 4.3455 102.60 13505 3.0801 48.097 105.00 33917 3.9764 117.03 100.30 1171 1.8509 5.7528 102.70 14190 3.1226 50.422 105.10 34960 4.0094 120.54 100.40 1581 1.9208 7.1920 102.80 14888 3.1645 52.792 105.20 36020 4.0421 124.11 100.50 2003 1.9882 8.6637 102.90 15600 3.2059 55.207 105.30 37096 4.0746 127.73 100.60 2435 2.0534 10.169 103.00 16326 3.2467 57.667 105.40 38189 4.1068 131.40 100.70 2877 2.1166 11.708 103.10 17066 3.2870 60.172 105.50 39299 4.1387 135.14 100.80 3331 2.1780 13.281 103.20 17819 3.3269 62.724 105.60 40426 4.1705 138.93 Q�( `100.90 3796 2.2376 14.889 103.30 18587 3.3663 65.322 105.70 41571 4.2019 142.77 BOO X1101.00 $6 4271 2.2958 16.534 103.40 19368 3.4052 67.967 105.80 42732 4.2332 146.67 101.10 4758 2.3525 18.214 103.50 20165 3.4436 70.659 105.90 43911 4.2642 150.64 101.20 5257 2.4078 19.931 103.60 20975 3.4817 73.399 101.30 5767 2.4619 21.685 103.70 21801 3.5193 76.188 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 4 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 50-50 MATCH Q (cfs) 2 . 29 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 4 . 11 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 100 . 98 PEAK OUTFLOW 2 .29 PEAK TIME : 510 . 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 4 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 6 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0008 0 . 0000 0 . 0008 0 . 0000 0 . 0008 99 . 00 30 . 00 O . 0008 0 . 0158 0 . 0000 0 . 0166 0 . 0008 0 . 0158 99 . 00 40 . 00 0 . 0158 0 . 0491 0 . 0000 0 . 0649 0 . 0158 0 . 0491 99 . 00 50 . 00 0 . 0491 0 . 0833 0 . 0000 0 . 1324 0 . 0491 0 . 0833 99 . 00 60 . 00 O . 0833 0 . 1436 0 . 0000 0 . 2269 0 . 0833 0 . 1436 99 . 00 70 . 00 O . 1436 0 .2147 0 . 0000 0 . 3583 0 . 1436 0 .2147 99 . 00 80 . 00 0 . 2147 0 .2594 0 . 0000 0 .4741 0 .2147 0 .2594 99 . 00 90 . 00 O . 2594 0 .2934 0 . 0000 0 . 5528 0 .2594 0 .2934 99 . 00 100 . 00 0 .2934 0 .3205 0 . 0000 0 . 6139 0 .2934 0 .3205 99 . 00 110 . 00 O . 3205 0 .3427 0 . 0000 0 . 6633 0 .3205 0 .3427 99 . 00 120 . 00 0 . 3427 0 .3874 0 . 0000 0 . 7301 0 .3427 0 .3874 99 . 00 130 . 00 0 . 3874 0 .4379 0 . 0000 0 . 8253 0 .3874 0 .4379 99 . 00 140 . 00 0 .4379 0 .4591 0 . 0000 0 . 8970 0 .4379 0 .4591 99 . 00 150 . 00 O .4591 0 .4705 0 . 0000 0 . 9296 0 .4591 0 .4705 99 . 00 160 . 00 0 .4705 0 .4871 0 . 0000 0 . 9577 0 .4705 0 .4871 99 . 00 170 . 00 0 .4871 0 .5012 0 . 0000 0 . 9884 0 .4871 0 . 5012 99 . 00 180 . 00 0 . 5012 0 .5106 0 . 0000 1 . 0118 0 . 5012 0 . 5106 99 . 00 190 . 00 0 . 5106 0 . 5258 0 .0000 1 . 0364 0 .5106 0 . 5258 99 . 00 200 . 00 0 . 5258 0 .5368 0 . 0000 1 . 0626 0 .5258 0 .5368 99 . 00 210 . 00 0 . 5368 0 .5425 0 . 0000 1 . 0794 0 .5368 0 . 5425 99 . 00 220 . 00 0 . 5425 0 . 5549 0 . 0000 1 . 0974 0 . 5425 0 . 5549 99 . 00 230 . 00 0 . 5549 0 . 5634 0 . 0000 1 . 1182 0 .5549 0 .5634 99 . 00 240 . 00 0 . 5634 0 . 6051 0 . 0000 1 . 1684 0 .5634 0 . 6051 99 . 00 250 . 00 0 . 6051 0 . 6515 0 .0000 1 . 2566 0 .6051 0 .6515 99 . 00 260 . 00 0 . 6515 0 . 6649 0 . 0000 1 . 3164 0 . 6515 0 . 6649 99 . 00 270 . 00 0 . 6649 0 . 6774 0 . 0000 1 . 3422 0 .6649 0 . 6774 99 . 00 280 . 00 0 . 6774 0 . 6806 0 . 0000 1 . 3580 0 .6774 0 . 6806 99 . 00 290 . 00 0 . 6806 0 . 6865 0 . 0000 1 . 3671 0 .6806 0 . 6865 99 . 00 300 . 00 0 . 6865 0 . 8468 0 . 0000 1 . 5333 0 .6865 0 . 8468 99 . 00 310 . 00 0 . 8468 1 . 0261 0 . 0000 1 . 8729 0 .8468 1 . 0261 99 . 00 320 . 00 1 . 0261 1 . 0603 0 . 0000 2 . 0864 1 .0261 1 . 0603 99 . 00 330 . 00 1 . 0603 1 . 0736 0 . 0000 2 . 1339 1.0603 1 . 0736 99 . 00 340 . 00 1 . 0736 1 . 0834 0 . 0000 2 . 1570 1.0736 1 . 0834 99 . 00 350 . 00 1 . 0834 1 . 0920 0 . 0000 2 . 1754 1.0834 1 . 0920 99 . 00 360 . 00 1 . 0920 1 . 0617 0 . 0000 2 . 1537 1. 0920 1 . 0617 99 . 00 370 . 00 1 . 0617 1 . 0250 0 . 0000 2 . 0867 1 . 0617 1 . 0250 99 . 00 380 . 00 1 . 0250 1 . 0201 0 . 0000 2 . 0452 1. 0250 1 . 0201 99 . 00 390 . 00 1 . 0201 1 . 0240 0 . 0000 2 . 0441 1 . 0201 1 . 0240 99 . 00 400 . 00 1 . 0240 1 . 0337 0 . 0000 2 . 0577 1. 0240 1 . 0337 99 . 00 410 . 00 1 . 0337 1 . 0341 0 . 0000 2 . 0678 1 .0337 1 . 0341 99 . 00 420 . 00 1 . 0341 1 . 5702 0 . 0000 2 . 6043 1. 0341 1 .5702 99 . 00 430 . 00 1 . 5702 2 . 1903 0 . 0000 3 . 7605 1 .5702 2 .1903 99 . 00 440 . 00 ' 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 5 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 281 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 2 . 1903 2 .2899 0 . 5336 5 . 0138 1 .6567 3 . 3571 100 . 04 450 . 00 2 . 2899 3 . 0734 1 . 6332 6 . 9965 1 .7239 5 . 2726 100 . 13 460 . 00 3 . 0734 3 . 9593 3 .4464 10 .479 1 . 8261 8 . 6530 100 . 27 470 . 00 3 . 9593 4 . 1094 6 . 6653 14 . 734 1 . 9877 12 . 746 100 . 50 480 . 00 4 . 1094 3 . 1238 10 . 589 17 . 822 2 . 1571 15 . 665 100 . 77 490 . 00 3 . 1238 1 . 9713 13 .400 18 .495 2 . 2651 16 . 230 100 . 95 500 . 00 1 . 9713 1 . 8170 13 . 945 17 . 733 2 .2850 15 .448 100 . 98 510 . 00 1 . 8170 1 . 7112 13 . 191 16 . 719 2 .2574 14 .462 100 . 93 520 . 00 1 . 7112 1 . 6168 12 . 240 15 . 568 2 .2218 13 . 346 100 . 87 530 . 00 1 . 6168 1 . 6063 11 . 166 14 . 389 2 . 1804 12 . 209 100 . 80 540 . 00 1 . 6063 1 . 3887 10 . 072 13 . 067 2 .1361 10 . 931 100 . 73 550 . 00 1 .3887 1 . 1420 8 . 8466 11 . 377 2 . 0847 9 . 2926 100 . 65 560 . 00 1 . 1420 1 . 1092 7 .2772 9 . 5285 2 . 0154 7. 5130 100 . 54 570 . 00 1 . 1092 1 . 1109 5 . 5775 7 . 7977 1 . 9355 5 . 8622 100 .42 580 . 00 1 . 1109 1 . 1068 4 . 0060 6 . 2237 1 .8562 4 . 3675 100 . 31 590 . 00 1 . 1068 1 . 1072 2 . 5881 4 . 8021 1 . 7794 3 . 0227 100 .20 600 . 00 1 . 1072 1 . 0663 1 . 3172 3 .4906 1 . 7055 1 . 7851 100 . 10 610 . 00 1 . 0663 1 . 0196 0 .1523 2 . 2381 1 . 6329 0 . 6053 100 . 01 620 . 00 1 . 0196 1 . 0139 0 . 0000 2 . 0335 0 . 6053 1 .4282 100 . 00 630 . 00 1 . 0139 1 . 0085 0 . 0000 2 . 0224 1 .4282 0 . 5942 100 . 00 640 . 00 1 . 0085 1 . 0137 0 . 0000 2 . 0222 0 . 5942 1.4280 100 . 00 650 . 00 1 . 0137 1 . 0150 0 . 0000 2 . 0287 1 .4280 0 . 6006 100 . 00 660 . 00 1 . 0150 0 . 9265 0 . 0000 1 . 9415 0 . 6006 1.3408 100 . 00 670 . 00 0 . 9265 0 . 8255 0 . 0000 1 . 7520 1 . 3408 0 .4112 100 . 00 680 . 00 O . 8255 0 . 8121 0 . 0000 1 . 6376 0 .4112 1 .2264 100 . 00 690 . 00 0 . 8121 0 . 8158 0 . 0000 1. 6279 1 . 2264 0 .4015 100 . 00 700 . 00 0 . 8158 0 . 8115 0 . 0000 1 . 6273 0 .4015 1 .2258 100 . 00 710 . 00 0 . 8115 0 . 8112 0 . 0000 1 . 6226 1 .2258 0 .3968 100 . 00 720 . 00 O . 8112 0 . 8168 0 . 0000 1 . 6280 0 .3968 1 .2311 100 . 00 730 . 00 0 . 8168 0 . 8126 0 . 0000 1 . 6293 1 .2311 0 .3982 100 . 00 740 . 00 0 . 8126 0 . 8123 0 . 0000 1 . 6249 0 .3982 1.2267 100 . 00 750 . 00 0 . 8123 0 . 8179 0 . 0000 1 . 6302 1 . 2267 0 .4035 100 . 00 760 . 00 O . 8179 0 . 8137 0 . 0000 1 . 6316 0 .4035 1 . 2280 100 . 00 770 . 00 0 . 8137 0 . 8134 0 . 0000 1 . 6271 1 .2280 0 .3991 100 . 00 780 . 00 O . 8134 0 . 7292 0 . 0000 1 . 5426 0 .3991 1 . 1435 100 . 00 790 . 00 0 . 7292 0 . 6281 0 . 0000 1 . 3572 1 . 1435 0 .2137 100 . 00 800 . 00 O . 6281 0 . 6144 0 . 0000 1 .2424 0 . 2137 1 . 0287 100 . 00 810 . 00 0 . 6144 0 . 6126 0 . 0000 1 .2270 1 . 0287 0 . 1983 100 . 00 820 . 00 0 . 6126 0 . 6126 0 . 0000 1 . 2252 0 . 1983 1 . 0269 100 . 00 830 . 00 0 . 6126 0 . 6127 0 . 0000 1 . 2253 1 . 0269 0 . 1984 100 . 00 840 . 00 0 . 6127 0 . 6552 0 . 0000 1 . 2679 0 . 1984 1 . 0695 100 . 00 850 . 00 0 . 6552 0 . 7088 0 . 0000 1 . 3640 1 . 0695 0 . 2945 100 . 00 860 . 00 0 . 7088 0 . 7164 0 . 0000 1 .4252 0 . 2945 1 . 1307 100 . 00 870 . 00 O . 7164 0 . 7123 0 . 0000 1 .4287 1 . 1307 0 . 2980 100 . 00 880 . 00 O . 7123 0 . 7172 0 . 0000 1 .4295 0 .2980 1 . 1316 100 . 00 890 . 00 0 . 7172 0 . 7181 0 . 0000 1 .4353 1 . 1316 0 .3038 100 . 00 900 . 00 O . 7181 0 . 7131 0 . 0000 1 .4312 0 . 3038 1 . 1275 100 . 00 910 . 00 O . 7131 0 .7179 0 . 0000 1 .4310 1 . 1275 0 .3036 100 . 00 920 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 6 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 7179 0 . 7187 0 . 0000 1 . 4366 0 . 3036 1 . 1331 100 . 00 930 . 00 0 . 7187 0 . 7137 0 . 0000 1 .4325 1. 1331 0 . 2994 100 . 00 940 . 00 0 . 7137 0 . 7185 0 . 0000 1 .4322 0 .2994 1 . 1329 100 . 00 950 . 00 0 . 7185 0 . 7193 0 . 0000 1 .4379 1 .1329 0 . 3050 100 . 00 960 . 00 0 . 7193 0 . 5816 0 . 0000 1 . 3009 0 . 3050 0 . 9959 100 . 00 970 . 00 0 . 5816 0 .4354 0 . 0000 1 . 0170 0 . 9959 0 . 0211 100 . 00 980 . 00 0 .4354 0 .4154 0 . 0000 0 . 8508 0 . 0211 0 . 8298 100 . 00 990 . 00 0 .4154 0 .4074 0 . 0000 0 . 8228 0 .8298 -0 . 0069 100 . 00 1000 . 00 0 .4074 0 .4117 -0 . 0069 0 . 8122 0 . 0000 0 . 8122 100 . 00 1010 . 00 0 .4117 0 .4123 0 . 0000 0 . 8240 0 . 8122 0 . 0118 100 . 00 1020 . 00 0 .4123 0 .4975 0 . 0000 0 . 9098 0 . 0118 0 . 8980 100 . 00 1030 . 00 0 .4975 0 . 5996 0 . 0000 1 . 0970 0 . 8980 0 . 1991 100 . 00 1040 . 00 0 . 5996 0 . 6137 0 . 0000 1 . 2132 0 . 1991 1 . 0142 100 . 00 1050 . 00 0 . 6137 0 . 6157 0 . 0000 1 . 2294 1 . 0142 0 . 2152 100 . 00 1060 . 00 0 . 6157 0 . 6161 0 . 0000 1 . 2318 0 . 2152 1 . 0166 100 . 00 1070 . 00 O . 6161 0 . 6163 0 . 0000 1 . 2324 1 . 0166 0 . 2158 100 . 00 1080 . 00 O . 6163 0 . 5738 0 . 0000 1 . 1901 0 .2158 0 . 9744 100 . 00 1090 . 00 0 . 5738 0 . 5202 0 . 0000 1 . 0941 0 . 9744 0 . 1197 100 . 00 1100 . 00 O . 5202 0 . 5130 0 . 0000 1 . 0332 0 . 1197 0 . 9135 100 . 00 1110 . 00 0 . 5130 0 . 6770 0 . 0000 1 . 1900 0 . 9135 0 . 2765 100 . 00 1120 . 00 O . 6770 0 . 5346 0 . 0000 1 . 2116 0 .2765 0 . 9351 100 . 00 1130 . 00 O . 5346 0 .3555 0 . 0000 0 . 8901 0 . 9351 -0 . 0450 100 . 00 1140 . 00 0 . 3555 0 .4960 -0 . 0450 0 . 8064 0 . 0000 0 . 8064 100 . 00 1150 . 00 0 .4960 0 . 5100 0 . 0000 1 . 0060 0 . 8064 0 . 1996 100 . 00 1160 . 00 O . 5100 0 . 5120 0 . 0000 1 . 0220 0 .1996 0 . 8224 100 . 00 1170 . 00 0 . 5120 0 . 5176 0 . 0000 1 . 0296 0 .8224 0 . 2072 100 . 00 1180 . 00 0 . 5176 0 . 5132 0 . 0000 1 . 0308 0 . 2072 0 . 8236 100 . 00 1190 . 00 0 . 5132 0 . 5126 0 . 0000 1 . 0258 0.8236 0 . 2022 100 . 00 1200 . 00 O . 5126 0 . 5179 0 . 0000 1 . 0305 0 .2022 0 . 8283 100 . 00 1210 . 00 O . 5179 0 . 5134 0 . 0000 1 . 0313 0 .8283 0 . 2030 100 . 00 1220 . 00 0 . 5134 0 . 5128 0 . 0000 1. 0262 0 .2030 0 . 8232 100 . 00 1230 . 00 0 . 5128 0 . 5182 0 . 0000 1 . 0310 0 . 8232 0 . 2077 100 . 00 1240 . 00 0 . 5182 0 . 5136 0 . 0000 1 . 0318 0 .2077 0 . 8240 100 . 00 1250 . 00 0 . 5136 0 . 5130 0 . 0000 1 . 0267 0 . 8240 0 . 2026 100 . 00 1260 . 00 0 . 5130 0 . 5184 0 . 0000 1 . 0314 0 .2026 0 . 8288 100 . 00 1270 . 00 0 . 5184 0 . 5138 0 . 0000 1 . 0322 0 . 8288 0 . 2034 100 . 00 1280 . 00 0 . 5138 0 . 5133 0 . 0000 1 . 0271 0 .2034 0 . 8237 100 . 00 1290 . 00 O . 5133 0 . 5186 0 . 0000 1 . 0318 0 . 8237 0 . 2082 100 . 00 1300 . 00 0 . 5186 0 . 5140 0 . 0000 1 . 0326 0 .2082 0 . 8244 100 . 00 1310 . 00 0 . 5140 0 . 5135 0 . 0000 1 . 0275 0 . 8244 0 . 2030 100 . 00 1320 . 00 0 . 5135 0 .4707 0 . 0000 0 . 9842 0 .2030 0 . 7812 100 . 00 1330 . 00 0 .4707 0 .4222 0 . 0000 0 . 8930 0 . 7812 0 . 1118 100 . 00 1340 . 00 0 .4222 0 .4156 0 . 0000 0 . 8378 0 . 1118 0 . 7260 100 . 00 1350 . 00 0 .4156 0 .4094 0 . 0000 0 . 8250 0 . 7260 0 . 0990 100 . 00 1360 . 00 0 .4094 0 .4139 0 . 0000 0 . 8233 0 . 0990 0 . 7243 100 . 00 1370 . 00 0 .4139 0 .4146 0 . 0000 0 . 8285 0 . 7243 0 . 1042 100 . 00 1380 . 00 0 .4146 0 .4094 0 . 0000 0 . 8239 0 . 1042 0 . 7198 100 . 00 1390 . 00 O .4094 0 .4140 0 . 0000 0 . 8234 0 . 7198 0 . 1036 100 . 00 1400 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 7 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 .4140 0 .4147 0 . 0000 0 . 8287 0 .1036 0 . 7251 100 . 00 1410 . 00 0 .4147 0 .4095 0 . 0000 0 . 8242 0 .7251 0 . 0991 100 . 00 1420 . 00 0 .4095 0 .4141 0 . 0000 0 . 8236 0 .0991 0 . 7245 100 . 00 1430 . 00 0 .4141 0 .4148 0 . 0000 0 . 8289 0 .7245 0 . 1044 100 . 00 1440 . 00 0 .4148 0 . 2332 0 . 0000 0 . 6480 0 .1044 0 . 5436 100 . 00 1450 . 00 0 . 2332 0 . 0320 0 . 0000 0 . 2652 0 .5436 -0 . 2784 100 . 00 1460 . 00 0 . 0320 0 . 0044 -0 . 2784 -0 . 2421 0 .0000 -0 .2421 100 . 00 1470 . 00 0 . 0044 0 . 0006 -0 . 2421 -0 . 2371 0 .0000 -0 . 2371 100 . 00 1480 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 8 r ROUTING REPORT TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No . A Description: Length: 75 . 00 ft . Width: 50 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1 : 4 Side Slope 3 : 4 Side Slope 2 : 4 Side Slope 4 : 4 Infiltration Rate : 0 . 00 min/inch MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. A Description: Outlet Elev: 99 . 00 Elev: 99 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 4 . 8867 in. ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 99.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 101.40 6289 1.0039 21.966 103.80 22641 1.4198 76.888 99.10 0.0000 0.2049 0.2049 101.50 6822 1.0246 23.765 103.90 23495 1.4345 79.753 99.20 0.0000 0.2898 0.2898 101.60 7367 1.0449 25.603 104.00 24365 1.4490 82.667 99.30 0.0000 0.3549 0.3549 101.70 7925 1.0648 27.481 104.10 25250 1.4635 85.631 99.40 0.0000 0.4099 0.4099 101.80 8494 1.0844 29.399 104.20 26151 1.4777 88.646 99.50 0.0000 0.4582 0.4582 101.90 9076 1.1036 31.358 104.30 27066 1.4919 91.712 99.60 0.0000 0.5020 0.5020 102.00 9671 1.1224 33.358 104.40 27997 1.5059 94.830 99.70 0.0000 0.5422 0.5422 102.10 10278 1.1410 35.400 104.50 28944 1.5198 98.000 99.80 0.0000 0.5796 0.5796 102.20 10897 1.1592 37.483 104.60 29907 1.5335 101.22 99.90 0.0000 0.6148 0.6148 102.30 11530 1.1772 39.609 104.70 30885 1.5472 104.50 100.00 0.0000 0.6480 0.6480 102.40 12175 1.1949 41.778 104.80 31879 1.5607 107.82 100.10 380.02 0.6797 1.9464 102.50 12833 1.2124 43.990 104.90 32890 1.5741 111.21 100.20 770.17 0.7099 3.2771 102.60 13505 1.2296 46.246 105.00 33917 1.5873 114.64 100.30 1171 0.7389 4.6408 102.70 14190 1.2465 48.546 105.10 34960 1.6005 118.13 100.40 1581 0.7668 6.0380 102.80 14888 1.2632 50.891 105.20 36020 1.6136 121.68 100.50 2003 0.7937 7.4692 102.90 15600 1.2798 53.281 105.30 37096 1.6265 125.28 100.60 2435 0.8197 8.9351 103.00 16326 1.2961 55.716 105.40 38189 1.6394 128.94 100.70 2877 0.8449 10.436 103.10 17066 1.3122 58.197 105.50 39299 1.6522 132.65 100.80 3331 0.8694 11.973 103.20 17819 1.3281 60.725 105.60 40426 1.6648 136.42 100.90 3796 0.8933 13.545 103.30 18587 1.3438 63.299 105.70 41571 1.6774 140.25 101.00 4271 0.9165 15.154 103.40 19368 1.3593 65.921 105.80 42732 1.6899 144.13 101.10 4758 0.9391 16.800 103.50 20165 1.3747 68.590 105.90 43911 1.7022 148.07 101.20 5257 0.9612 18.484 103.60 20975 1.3899 71.308 101.30 5767 0.9828 20.206 103.70 21801 1.4049 74.074 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 9 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 25-5 MATCH Q (cfs) 1 . 12 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 3 . 61 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 102 . 00 PEAK OUTFLOW 1 . 12 PEAK TIME : 560 . 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 3 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 5 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0068 0 . 0000 0 . 0068 0 . 0000 0 . 0068 99 . 00 40 . 00 0 . 0068 0 . 0293 0 . 0000 0 . 0361 0 . 0068 0 . 0293 100 . 00 50 . 00 0 . 0293 0 . 0581 0 . 0000 0 . 0874 0 . 0293 0 . 0581 100 . 00 60 . 00 0 . 0581 0 . 1081 0 . 0000 0 . 1663 0 . 0581 0 . 1081 100 . 00 70 . 00 0 . 1081 0 . 1676 0 . 0000 0 .2758 0 . 1081 0 . 1676 100 . 00 80 . 00 O . 1676 0 . 2078 0 . 0000 0 .3754 0 . 1676 0 . 2078 100 . 00 90 . 00 0 . 2078 0 . 2391 0 . 0000 0 .4469 0 .2078 0 . 2391 100 . 00 100 . 00 0 . 2391 0 . 2645 0 . 0000 0 . 5036 0 .2391 0 . 2645 100 . 00 110 . 00 0 . 2645 0 . 2856 0 . 0000 0 . 5501 0 .2645 0 . 2856 100 . 00 120 . 00 O . 2856 0 . 3254 0 . 0000 0 . 6110 0 .2856 0 . 3254 100 . 00 130 . 00 0 . 3254 0 . 3702 0 . 0000 0 . 6956 0 . 3254 0 . 3702 100 . 00 140 . 00 0 . 3702 0 . 3903 0 . 0000 0 . 7606 0 . 3702 0 . 3903 100 . 00 150 . 00 0 . 3903 0 .4019 0 . 0000 0 . 7923 0 . 3903 0 .4019 100 . 00 160 . 00 O .4019 0 .4166 0 . 0000 0 . 8185 0 .4019 0 .4166 100 . 00 170 . 00 0 . 4166 0 .4275 0 . 0000 0 . 8441 0 .4166 0 .4275 100 . 00 180 . 00 0 .4275 0 .4350 0 . 0000 0 . 8624 0 .4275 0 .4350 100 . 00 190 . 00 O .4350 0 .4487 0 . 0000 0 . 8837 0 .4350 0 .4487 100 . 00 200 . 00 0 .4487 0 .4592 0 . 0000 0 . 9079 0 .4487 0 .4592 100 . 00 210 . 00 O .4592 0 .4650 0 . 0000 0 . 9242 0 .4592 0 .4650 100 . 00 220 . 00 0 .4650 0 .4764 0 . 0000 0 . 9415 0 .4650 0 .4764 100 . 00 230 . 00 0 .4764 0 .4845 0 . 0000 0 . 9610 0 .4764 0 .4845 100 .00 240 . 00 0 .4845 0 . 5212 0 . 0000 1 . 0058 0 .4845 0 . 5212 100 . 00 250 . 00 0 . 5212 0 . 5620 0 . 0000 1 . 0833 0 . 5212 0 .5620 100 .00 260 . 00 0 . 5620 0 . 5743 0 . 0000 1 . 1363 0 . 5620 0 . 5743 100 . 00 270 . 00 0 . 5743 0 . 5858 0 . 0000 1 . 1601 0 . 5743 0 . 5858 100 . 00 280 . 00 0 . 5858 0 . 5892 0 . 0000 1 . 1750 0 . 5858 0 . 5892 100 . 00 290 . 00 0 . 5892 0 . 5949 0 . 0000 1 . 1842 0 . 5892 0 . 5949 100 . 00 300 . 00 0 . 5949 0 . 7347 0 . 0000 1 . 3296 0 . 5949 0 . 7347 100 . 00 310 . 00 0 . 7347 0 . 8912 0 . 0845 1 . 7104 0 . 6501 1 . 0602 100 . 01 320 . 00 0 . 8912 0 . 9218 0 .4022 2 . 2152 0 . 6581 1 . 5571 100 . 03 330 . 00 0 . 92.18 0 . 9344 0 . 8869 2 . 7431 0 . 6702 2 . 0729 100 . 07 340 . 00 0 . 9344 0 . 9437 1 . 3903 3 . 2684 0 . 6825 2 . 5859 100 . 11 350 . 00 0 . 9437 0 . 9520 1 . 8917 3 . 7874 0 . 6942 3 . 0933 100 . 15 360 . 00 0 . 9520 0 . 9263 2 . 3875 4 . 2658 0 . 7057 3 . 5601 100 . 19 370 . 00 0 . 9263 0 . 8949 2 . 8442 4 . 6654 0 . 7159 3 . 9495 100 .22 380 . 00 0 . 8949 0 . 8911 3 . 2253 5 . 0114 0 . 7242 4 .2872 100 .25 390 . 00 0 . 8911 0 . 8951 3 . 5558 5 . 3420 0 .7314 4 . 6107 100 .27 400 . 00 0 . 8951 0 . 9040 3 . 8725 5 . 6715 0 . 7382 4 . 9333 100 .30 410 . 00 O . 9040 0 . 9049 4 . 1886 5 . 9974 0 . 7447 5 . 2527 100 .32 420 . 00 0 . 9049 1 .3749 4 . 5016 6 . 7813 0 . 7511 6 . 0303 100 .34 430 . 00 1 . 3749 1 . 9192 5 . 2636 8 . 5577 0 . 7666 7 . 7911 100 .40 440 . 00 1 . 9192 2 . 0080 6 . 9917 10 . 919 0 . 7994 10 . 119 100 . 52 450 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 10 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 2 . 0080 2 . 6977 9 . 2799 13 . 986 0 . 8396 13 . 146 100 . 68 460 . 00 2 . 6977 3 .4785 12 . 259 18 .435 0 . 8872 17 . 548 100 . 87 470 . 00 3 .4785 3 . 6138 16 . 599 23 . 691 0 . 9489 22 . 742 101 . 14 480 . 00 3 . 6138 2 . 7488 21 . 729 28 . 092 1 . 0129 27 . 079 101 .44 490 . 00 2 . 7488 1 . 7357 26 . 019 30 . 503 1 . 0606 29 .443 101 . 68 500 . 00 1 . 7357 1 . 6004 28 .358 31 . 694 1 . 0848 30 . 609 101 . 80 510 . 00 1 . 6004 1 . 5077 29 .513 32 . 621 1 . 0962 31 . 525 101 . 86 520 . 00 1 . 5077 1 .4249 30 .420 33 .352 1 . 1051 32 . 247 101 . 91 530 . 00 1 .4249 1 .4160 31. 135 33 . 976 1 . 1119 32 . 864 101 . 94 540 . 00 1 .4160 1 . 2245 31 . 746 34 .387 1 . 1178 33 . 269 101 . 98 550 . 00 1 . 2245 1 . 0071 32 . 148 34 . 379 1 . 1216 33 . 258 102 . 00 560 . 00 1 . 0071 0 . 9784 32 . 136 34 . 122 1 . 1215 33 . 000 101 . 99 570 . 00 O . 9784 0 . 9800 31 . 881 33 . 839 1 . 1190 32 . 720 101 . 98 580 . 00 0 . 9800 0 . 9766 31.604 33 . 561 1 . 1164 32 .444 101 . 97 590 . 00 0 . 9766 0 . 9770 31.330 33 .284 1 . 1138 32 . 170 101 . 95 600 . 00 0 . 9770 0 . 9410 31. 059 32 . 977 1 . 1112 31 . 866 101 . 94 610 . 00 0 . 9410 0 . 8999 30 .757 32 . 598 1 . 1083 31 .490 101 . 93 620 . 00 0 . 8999 0 . 8950 30 .385 32 . 180 1 . 1048 31 . 075 101 . 91 630 . 00 0 . 8950 0 . 8903 29. 974 31 .760 1 . 1008 30 . 659 101 . 89 640 . 00 0 . 8903 0 . 8950 29 .562 31 .348 1 . 0967 30 . 251 101 . 86 650 . 00 O . 8950 0 . 8963 29 .158 30 . 949 1 . 0927 29 . 857 101 . 84 660 . 00 O . 8963 0 . 8182 28 .768 30 .482 1 . 0888 29 . 393 101 . 82 670 . 00 0 . 8182 0 . 7291 28 .309 29 . 856 1 . 0843 28 . 772 101 . 80 680 . 00 0 . 7291 0 . 7173 27.694 29 . 140 1 . 0780 28 . 063 101 . 77 690 . 00 O . 7173 0 . 7207 26 . 992 28 .430 1 . 0708 27 . 359 101 . 73 700 . 00 0 . 7207 0 . 7168 26 .295 27 . 733 1 . 0635 26 . 669 101 . 69 710 . 00 0 . 7168 0 . 7167 25 .613 27 . 047 1 . 0562 25 . 990 101 . 66 720 . 00 0 . 7167 0 . 7216 24 .941 26 . 380 1 . 0490 25 . 331 101 . 62 730 . 00 0 . 7216 0 .7180 24 .289 25 . 728 1 . 0419 24 . 686 101 . 59 740 . 00 0 . 7180 0 .7178 23 .652 25 . 087 1 . 0348 24 . 053 101 . 55 750 . 00 0 . 7178 0 . 7228 23 .025 24 .465 1 . 0278 23 .438 101 . 52 760 . 00 0 . 7228 0 . 7191 22 .417 23 . 859 1 . 0209 22 . 838 101 .48 770 . 00 0 . 7191 0 .7189 21 .824 23 . 262 1 . 0140 22 .248 101 .45 780 . 00 0 . 7189 0 . 6445 21 .241 22 . 604 1 . 0072 21. 597 101 .42 790 . 00 0 . 6445 0 . 5552 20 . 597 21 . 797 0 . 9995 20 .798 101 . 38 800 . 00 0 . 5552 0 . 5431 19 . 808 20 . 906 0 . 9899 19. 916 101 . 33 810 . 00 0 . 5431 0 . 5416 18 . 937 20 . 022 0 . 9792 19. 042 101 . 28 820 . 00 0 . 5416 0 . 5415 18 . 074 19 . 157 0 . 9682 18 . 189 101 . 23 830 . 00 0 . 5415 0 . 5417 17 .232 18 . 315 0 . 9573 17.358 101 . 18 840 . 00 0 . 5417 0 . 5793 16 .411 17 . 532 0 . 9464 16 .586 101 . 13 850 . 00 0 . 5793 0 . 6267 15 . 650 16 . 856 0 . 9361 15 . 920 101 . 09 860 . 00 0 . 6267 0 . 6334 14 . 993 16 . 253 0 . 9270 15 . 326 101 . 05 870 . 00 0 . 6334 0 . 6299 14 .407 15 . 670 0 . 9188 14 .752 101 . 01 880 . 00 0 . 6299 0 . 6343 13 . 841 15 . 105 0 . 9107 14 . 195 100 . 97 890 . 00 0 . 6343 0 . 6351 13 .292 14 . 561 0 . 9026 13 . 659 100 . 94 900 . 00 0 . 6351 0 . 6307 12 . 764 14 . 029 0 . 8949 13 . 135 100 . 91 910 . 00 0 . 6307 0 . 6350 12 .248 13 . 513 0 . 8870 12 . 626 100 . 87 920 . 00 0 . 6350 0 . 6357 11. 747 13 . 018 0 . 8793 12 .138 100 . 84 930 . 00 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 11 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 6357 0 . 6313 11 .266 12 . 533 0 . 8719 11. 661 100 . 81 940 . 00 0 . 6313 0 . 6356 10 . 797 12 . 064 0 . 8645 11 . 199 100 . 78 950 . 00 0 . 6356 0 . 6364 10 .342 11 . 614 0 . 8571 10 . 757 100 . 75 960 . 00 0 . 6364 0 . 5145 9 . 9070 11 . 058 0 . 8501 10 . 208 100 . 72 970 . 00 0 . 5145 0 . 3852 9 . 3668 10 . 266 0 . 8411 9 .4254 100 . 68 980 . 00 0 . 3852 0 . 3675 8 . 5974 9 . 3502 0 . 8279 8 . 5222 100 . 63 990 . 00 0 . 3675 0 . 3605 7 . 7099 8 .4379 0 . 8124 7 . 6255 100 . 57 1000 . 00 0 . 3605 0 . 3642 6 . 8290 7 . 5537 0 . 7964 6 .7573 100 . 51 1010 . 00 0 . 3642 0 .3648 5 . 9770 6 . 7061 0 . 7803 5 . 9258 100 .45 1020 . 00 0 .3648 0 .4402 5 . 1613 5 . 9663 0 . 7645 5 . 2017 100 . 39 1030 . 00 0 .4402 0 . 5305 4 . 4517 5 .4224 0 . 7501 4 . 6723 100 . 34 1040 . 00 0 . 5305 0 . 5430 3 . 9328 5 . 0063 0 . 7395 4 . 2668 100 . 30 1050 . 00 0 . 5430 0 . 5449 3 . 5359 4 . 6238 0 . 7309 3 . 8929 100 . 27 1060 . 00 0 . 5449 0 . 5452 3 . 1699 4 . 2600 0 . 7230 3 .5370 100 . 25 1070 . 00 0 .5452 0 . 5454 2 . 8216 3 . 9122 0 . 7154 3 . 1968 100 . 22 1080 . 00 0 . 5454 0 . 5078 2 .4887 3 . 5419 0 . 7081 2 . 8339 100 . 19 1090 . 00 0 . 5078 0 .4604 2 . 1341 3 . 1023 0 . 6998 2 .4025 100 . 17 1100 . 00 0 .4604 0 .4540 1 . 7125 2 . 6269 0 . 6900 1 . 9369 100 . 13 1110 . 00 0 .4540 0 . 5992 1 . 2574 2 . 3107 0 . 6794 1 . 6312 100 . 10 1120 . 00 0 . 5992 0 .4732 0 . 9592 2 . 0316 0 . 6720 1 .3597 100 . 08 1130 . 00 0 .4732 0 . 3146 0 . 6943 1 .4821 0 . 6654 0 . 8167 100 . 05 1140 . 00 0 . 3146 0 . 4390 0 . 1646 0 . 9182 0 . 6521 0 . 2661 100 . 01 1150 . 00 0 .4390 0 .4514 0 . 0000 0 . 8904 0 .2661 0 . 6244 100 . 00 1160 . 00 0 .4514 0 .4532 0 . 0000 0 . 9046 0 . 6244 0 . 2802 100 . 00 1170 . 00 0 .4532 0 .4582 0 . 0000 0 . 9114 0 .2802 0 . 6312 100 . 00 1180 . 00 0 .4582 0 .4543 0 . 0000 0 . 9125 0 . 6312 0 .2813 100 . 00 1190 . 00 0 .4543 0 .4538 0 . 0000 0 . 9080 0 . 2813 0 . 6267 100 . 00 1200 . 00 0 .4538 0 .4585 0 . 0000 0 . 9123 0 . 6267 0 .2856 100 . 00 1210 . 00 0 .4585 0 .4545 0 . 0000 0 . 9130 0 . 2856 0 . 6274 100 . 00 1220 . 00 0 .4545 0 . 4540 0 . 0000 0 . 9085 0 . 6274 0 .2811 100 . 00 1230 . 00 0 .4540 0 .4587 0 . 0000 0 . 9128 0 . 2811 0 . 6317 100 . 00 1240 . 00 0 .4587 0 .4547 0 . 0000 0 . 9135 0 . 6317 0 .2818 100 . 00 1250 . 00 0 .4547 0 .4542 0 . 0000 0 . 9090 0 . 2818 0 . 6272 100 . 00 1260 . 00 0 .4542 0 .4590 0 . 0000 0 . 9132 0 . 6272 0 .2860 100 . 00 1270 . 00 0 .4590 0 .4549 0 . 0000 0 . 9139 0 . 2860 0 . 6279 100 . 00 1280 . 00 0 .4549 0 .4545 0 . 0000 0 . 9094 0 . 6279 0 .2815 100 . 00 1290 . 00 0 .4545 0 .4592 0 . 0000 0 . 9136 0 . 2815 0 . 6321 100 . 00 1300 . 00 0 .4592 0 .4552 0 . 0000 0 . 9143 0 . 6321 0 . 2822 100 . 00 1310 . 00 0 .4552 0 .4547 0 . 0000 0 . 9098 0 . 2822 0 . 6276 100 . 00 1320 . 00 0 .4547 0 .4168 0 . 0000 0 . 8715 0 . 6276 0 .2439 100 . 00 1330 . 00 0 .4168 0 . 3739 0 . 0000 0 . 7907 0 .2439 0 . 5468 100 . 00 1340 . 00 0 . 3739 0 . 3680 0 . 0000 0 . 7419 0 . 5468 0 . 1951 100 . 00 1350 . 00 0 . 3680 0 . 3625 0 . 0000 0 . 7306 0 . 1951 0 . 5355 100 . 00 1360 . 00 0 . 3625 0 . 3666 0 . 0000 0 . 7291 0 . 5355 0 . 1936 100 . 00 1370 . 00 0 .3666 0 . 3671 0 . 0000 0 . 7337 0 . 1936 0 . 5401 100 . 00 1380 . 00 0 . 3671 0 . 3625 0 . 0000 0 . 7297 0 . 5401 0 . 1896 100 . 00 1390 . 00 0 . 3625 0 . 3667 -0 . 0000 0 . 7292 0 . 1896 0 . 5396 100 . 00 1400 . 00 0 . 3667 0 . 3673 0 . 0000 0 . 7339 0 . 5396 0 . 1943 100 . 00 1410 . 00 , ( ( 6/ 3/96 Mackenzie Engineering Inc page 12 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 3673 0 . 3627 0 . 0000 0 . 7299 0 .1943 0 . 5356 100 . 00 1420 . 00 0 .3627 0 . 3668 0 . 0000 0 .7294 0 .5356 0 . 1938 100 . 00 1430 . 00 0 .3668 0 . 3674 0 . 0000 0 . 7342 0 . 1938 0 . 5403 100 . 00 1440 . 00 0 . 3674 0 .2066 0 . 0000 0 . 5740 0 . 5403 0 . 0336 100 . 00 1450 . 00 0 . 2066 0 . 0283 0 . 0000 0 . 2349 0 . 0336 0 .2013 100 . 00 1460 . 00 0 . 0283 0 . 0039 0 . 0000 0 . 0322 0 .2013 -0 . 1691 100 . 00 1470 . 00 0 . 0039 0 . 0005 -0 . 1691 -0 . 1646 0 . 0000 -0 . 1646 100 . 00 1480 . 00 WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services A P.O.BOX 641,PORTLAND,OREGON 97207 503/222-7007 •.`""'"'°"`TT Of cn..turMG...O.STS TREE CONDITION ANALYSIS Farmers Insurance Site Prepared for: GROUP MACKENZIE 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 September 26, 1996 Prepared by: William L. Owen, B.S.,M.A.,C.A. American Society of Consulting Arborists#114 fig {., % _ INSPECTION.DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF TREES,SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS. . c:�;r 4-•����►, �'• CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING.TRANSPLANTING,PRESERVATION,MAINTENANCE AND "!G'►!',F;�.f-' ARBOREAL PLANNING.COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS.DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES.LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES. WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES A Tree and Landscape Consulting Services LAVA. P.O. BOX 641,PORTLAND,OREGON 97207 503/222-7007 co,sa.n..c.aaoa.ns September 26, 1996 Group Mackenzie 0690 SW Bancroft Street PO Box 69039 Portland, OR 97201-0039 Attention: Tamio Fukuyama/Project Manager-Architect RE: Farmers Insurance Site Development Tree Preservation Plan Dear Mr. Fukuyama: Enclosed find the tree survey for the subject site in partial fullfillment of the City of Tigard tree preservation requirements. Please let me know if you need additional information to this report. Thank you very much. Very truly o ,� 7 - 401/0 _ / Willi.. ,`e , B.S., M.A., .A. American Society of Consulting Arborists#114 n {` ; it INSPECTION.DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF TREES,SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS. t. v�:.. . CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING,TRANSPLANTING,PRESERVATION.MAINTENANCE AND .*.1."'"►i.".1f'_• ARBOREAL PLANNING.COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS.DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS . FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES.LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES. TABLE OF CONTENTS Problem/Task/Methodolody 1 Present Condition 1 Insect, Nature/Man-caused Damage 2 Findings 2 Recommendations 3 Monitoring 5 Summary/Mitigation Report 6 Mitigation Tree Cost Estimate 7 Tree List (Removals) 8, 9 Glossary 10 Tree Care Standards 11 GROUP MACKENZIE FARMERS INSURANCE PROJECT TREE ANALYSIS AND PRESERVATION REPORT 1) Problem and task: The purpose of the survey on the subject site is to prepare the Tree Plan Requirement Report as required by the City of Tigard Municipal Code/18.150.025. The implementation of the purpose is to survey the trees on the subject site by visual examination, with special attention to those marked for preservation (see enclosed plot plan) to determine: a) present condition, and prognosis for survival for the trees to remain on the site, and b) their suitability for preservation as landscape amenity trees. 2) Methodology of Analysis of tree population: A visual inspection of each tree has been done from buttress flare to the top, looking for abnormalities and indications of disease (dead tissue, galls, conks, etc.) in an effort to find visual symptoms of failure or hazard. The buttress root flare of each of the major trees marked for preservation on the site was examined visually in an effort to detect evidence of Basal Rot, decay or other indications of instability. For the purpose of this examination, no invasive work was done. 3) Present condition: There appeared to be no indication of major problems in any of the trees other than storm damage in some of the larger specimens of Fir and the Oak. There is some die-back in some of the Maples, typical for the species in this kind of setting. The Ash trees typically have die-back as they reach the age of many of the trees on this site. The Sequoia have internal needle die-back which is normal for conifers in a somewhat crowded situation. The Cedar have interior needle die-back, typical in a situation of this kind. The Cottonwoods are flourishing as they will in a competitive situation of this kind. The Apple and Cherry are performing in a typical fashion with no apparent problems. The large Black Walnut is a substantial specimen but nothing extraordinary in terms of general condition. The large Oaks are variously damaged by storms. Those which will be Farmer's Ins/WLO&Assoc#9643 1 preserved can be treated and pruned properly to encourage proper crown formation and safety. Likewise the major Firs have some die-back in the crowns. Those which will be preserved can be detailed to modern standards and made viable and attractive as well. Overall, the setting is comprised of a naturally occurring grove, much of it reasonably young, in heavy competition, untended, with the major Oaks and the larger Firs dominating, except in the southwest corner where the Cottonwoods are typically overshadowing other trees in the fight for light and growth space. Major Maples in that area are also doing well. The site tree population is a typical forest, untended area, with many good species, a substantial number of which will be preserved in this project as accents and amenities to the property. b) Insects: No apparent insect infections in any of the species was noted in the course of the survey, particularly in the species selected for preservation. Typical infestations of a minor nature present are mites, aphid and leaf miner. Nothing serious. c) Man-Caused Damage: There is slight damage now present on roots of some of the trees, particularly in the northern end around several of the larger Oaks. This is not serious. The trees should do well. d) Nature-Caused Damage: As noted earlier there is some storm damage in the larger species and resultant breakage and die back of certain parts of the crowns. This is not heavy and can be corrected with proper pruning to modern standards at the appropriate time during the development of the project. Such work will be covered more fully later herein. 4) Findings: The major tree population marked for preservation on the site is comprised of a variety of species: Ash, Alder, Oak, Cedar, Birch, Maple, Fir, Pine, Sequoia, Cottonwood, Apple, Cherry and Walnut(see glossary). The task further is to identify by location and size all of the existing species on the site, and to prepare a mitigation report based on all trees over 12" caliper on the site (see detail following). All trees to be removed are shown on the enclosed plot plan marked in red. All trees to Farmer's Ins/WLO&Assoc#9643 2 be retained are shown on the enclosed plot plan marked in green. Included is the tree survey information necessary to satisfy the requirements of the municipal code with regard to retainage of trees over 12" in caliper to develop the mitigation percentage prescribed in section 18.150.025, Point B, paragraph c. As is shown, the retainage formula places the subject site in the 50%to 75%category. The tree numbers and mitigation formula execution are provided on the summary sheet. All of the trees marked in green on the plot plan have been inspected as described herein. Those marked for preservation at this time have good annual growth, good color, minimal dead wood, good terminal viability, and will need only routine professional care to put and keep them in a reasonable condition in terms of branching and crown configuration. It should be noted that all have been "forest" trees to this time. Those in the grove will remain so. This means that in many trees low branching is sparse or non-existent due to the heavy crowding. High crowns have developed in competition for light, as is typical in these situations. However,the trees can survive and do well in the new environment, given proper professional care and monitoring. (See recommendations following herein.) Trees marked in red for removal include trees which are just outside the building envelopes, to a reasonable distance (app. 10')to avoid retaining trees which should not be left too close to buildings. This is a more sensible approach not only to retain desirable trees but also is a safety measure because the trees remaining can be cared for properly as they grow and still allow for protection of buildings, yet enhance the amenity value of the trees to the buildings. 5) Recommendations: In satisfaction of 181.150.025 under subsection 4, "A Protection Program defining Standards and Methods that will be used by the Applicant to Protect Trees During and after Construction", I submit the following: a) Before construction: 1) The clearing of trees to come off the site preparatory to beginning construction of the buildings and parking lot will be done only after meeting with the clearing contractor on site regarding plans to protect those species selected to remain. Tree protection fencing comprised of orange plastic, 4' high, on steel posts driven into the ground on 8' centers, will be placed around individual trees or groups of trees to provide protection at the drip line of the trees to be preserved from all encroachment during activity in the cleaning and grading process and all other construction activity. This is best done in cooperation with construction and grading contractors with the Consulting Arborist on site Farmer's Ins/WLO&Assoc#9643 3 to direct the placement of the fencing. 2) The Consulting Arborist will be on call during the clearing work, as well as inspect without prior notice, to insure full compliance with methods recommended. Close observation during this period of the operation is vitally important in tree protection, and works well done in this manner. b) During construction: During construction of the parking lot and the buildings, decisions will be made situationally on site by the Consulting Arborist regarding specific root impact/interface problems, working with the construction contractor. Long experience has demonstrated that this technique is the best way to maximize retention of trees. Only on-site with specific reference to the building layout, exact location of buildings,parking lots, etc. can these decisions best be made. I am retained through completion of the project for this purpose and will work closely with all contractors and supervisory personnel throughout the process to insure compliance with the tree protection standards as described herein. c) Post construction therapy: 1) Ongoing maintenance specifications required for all trees retained. All tree work to be done only by State Licensed/International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborists, as directed by the Consulting Arborist. a) Pruning to be done to Standards of the American National Standards Institute for tree work (see enclosed ff.), as outlined: 1) Dead wood, stub, hanger removal 2) Crown shaping as needed for better appearance/balance. 3) Thinning for wind sail reduction, where necessary, tree by tree, as recommended by the Consulting Arborist. Note: thinning of any tree crown shall not exceed 10% unless specifically directed by the Consulting Arborist. b) Fertilizing to National Arborist Association Standards, DRF method(see enclosure ff.),as outlined: 1) Formula to be slow-release, liquid, with trace elements. 2) Specific ratio,NPK and trace elements, to be approved by Consulting Arborist in advance. 3) Timing of application must be set by Consulting Arborist, and will occur only between July 15 and August 15 of the Farmer's Ins/WLO&Assoc#9643 4 first growth year following completion of construction work around the trees. c) Irrigation around trees, especially Oaks, Firs and Cedars, may be by natural rainfall only, except as may be modified by Landscape Architect and Consulting Arborist in relation to the designed-in landscape trees and shrubs. (Plantings under native tree species should be chosen accordingly.) d) Insect and disease control (plant healthcare) applications, if any, will be based on specific need only. The type, amount and timing of applications to be approved in advance by the Consulting Arborist in conjunction with the Certified Arborist Contractor chosen to do the work. All work done to National Arborist Association Standards (see enclosed ff.). 6) Monitoring Program: a) A critical element in tree preservation in construction trauma impacted trees is periodic, ongoing inspections of the trees by the Consulting Arborist who 1) did the initial tree examination and report, and 2) witnessed the construction impact on a specific, tree-by-tree basis. b) Tree monitoring inspection should be done twice annually, Spring and Fall (April- May and September-October) for the first three growth years following completion of construction, then(normally) once annually thereafter. c) Inspection findings for maintenance therapies should be specified in writing by the Consulting Arborist for necessary tree maintenance work. I believe the foregoing shows what is necessary and possible to do on the site regarding tree preservation, both now and ongoing,how and when the necessary work should be done, by whom, and under whose direction. If the findings and instructions herein are noted, observed and carried out as recommended, the result can be a well done business park addition to the City of Tigard. The site will have a significant preserved natural tree population, supplemented by a professionally designed landscape plan that should not only survive the construction but also be set up to enhance and endure for years to come. r2;//7, Ale ,/ //' ' 141 4e//i /i /1 9/10 William L. n, B.S., N .A., .A. f' Date American Society of Consulting Arborists#114 Farmer's Ins/WLO&Assoc#9643 5 FARMERS INSURANCE SITE SUMMARY/RECONCILIATION Applied Mitigation Formula Total trees on site over 12" (13" and larger) caliper: Removed = 168 trees, 13" and larger Saved = 232 trees, 13" and larger Total = 400 trees 13" and larger on site 232 saved trees = 58% of trees 13" and larger, which results in the 50-75% retainage category=mitigate 50% of removed trees= 168 trees = 3589 caliper inches, -2 = 1794.50 caliper inches = 1794.50" - 3" = 598 (3" trees) needed to mitigate, less those provided in landscape plan(200) =3(see breakdown ff.) Landscape plans provide for a total of 200 trees to be planted on site, @ 3" caliper or equivalent. 6 (cdar L:uu;scap&. Inc. 14.3-5 S1\ Patricia Avenue, Hillsboro, Ore2on 9"'123 �®r . -_ ASSMINAIMMOMMIPBMOUV AMON► F J) Date: 10/07/96 Yumhcr t Nw_es including cover sheet 1 To: R&H Construction Company From: Norm Dowty `.like lolodziejczak Phone. 22S-7177 i Phone- (503)62S-3-111 x1� Fax phone: "-I-363S ---- - Fax phone (503)62S-6223 CC: cedar file ,M, e ; . RE\L .RKS: ❑ Lr`ent Q For your re`iew ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment RE: Colonel Pacific Leasint! -- Tigard As requested. below I have provided a cost to replace 1 [94 calif er inches of Oaks. Alders. and Ash trees Nvith398 each 3" caliper trees. Material Cost. S115.00 Labor Cost. S 28.00 Equipment Cost. S 15.00 General Conditions. i.e.: material p u LK. delivery S 8.00 Unit Co,*Total 5166.00 ea. x 398 = S66.068.00 If von have any questions please call me at our office or page me at 51.1-9783. Thank you. '.We4e o1ad4ieye tak 7 TREES TO BE REMOVED Over 12" Caliper # Caliper # Caliper # Caliper # Caliper # Caliper 1 14" 27 16" 58 14" 82 20" 111 22" 2 18" 28 14" 59 40" 83 18" 112 20" 4 18" 29 14" 60 16" 85 14" 114 20" 5 14" 30 24" 61 14" 86 20" 116 16" 6 16" 31 14" 62 24" 89 18" 117 16" 7 16" 32 14" 63 20" 90 22" 119 14" 8 16" 33 33" 64 26" 92 16" 122 18" 9 14" 35 14" 65 18" 93 16" 123 21" 11 16" 37 14" 66 24" 94 18" 124 14" 12 16" 38 24" 67 14" 95 14" 126 18" 13 16" 39 14" 68 14" 96 16" 127 14" 15 18" 43 14" 69 26" 97 22" 130 14" 16 18" 46 48" 72 20" 98 14" 131 14" 19 48" 47 26" 73 24" 102 16" 132 18" 20 38" 52 28" 75 14" 103 18" 133 26" 21 16" 53 24" 76 14" 106 16" 134 16" 23 16" 55 24" 78 24" 108 20" 135 20" 24 14" 56 14" 79 14" 109 16" 137 18" 26 14" 57 26" 80 16" 110 18" 138 20" 8 TREES TO BE REMOVED Over 12" Caliper # Caliper # Caliper # Caliper # Caliper 139 16" 172 24" 195 28" 214 18" 145 20" 174 28" 196 22" 217 14" 150 22" 175 38" 197 46" 219 42" 151 22" 176 20" 198 26" 220 16" 153 24" 177 34" 199 18" 221 38" 154 14" 178 36" 200 18" 224 24" 155 16" 179 32" 201 30" 225 38" 156 14" 180 20" 202 20" 227 28" 157 14" 181 20" 203 28" 228 20" 159 23" 182 20" 204 28" 229 24" 160 14" 183 14" 205 30" 230 30" 162 16" 184 42" 206 36" 232 36" 164 16" 188 18" 207 24" 234 36" 165 16" 189 20" 208 18" 235 36" 166 14" 190 36" 209 16" 237 16" 167 16" 191 42" 210 16" 238 36" 168 14" 192 44" 211 22" 169 16" 193 42" 212 22" 170 16" 194 18" 213 16" 9 FARMERS INSURANCE SITE SPECIES GLOSSARY Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) Oregon Ash (Fraxinus americana) Red Alder (Alnus rubra) Oregon White Oak (Quercus garryana) European Birch (Betula pendula) Pine (Pinus contorta) Sequoia (Sequoia gigantea) Bigleaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum) Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) Apple (Malus spp.) Cherry (Prunus spp.) Walnut (Juglans nigra) 10 PRUNING STANDARDS With the American National Standard for pruning, ANSI A300, specifications can be written in a virtual infinite number of combinations. The following information is designed to help you understand exactly what will be accomplished in a pruning operation. Branch Size A minimum or maximum diameter size of branches to be removed should be specified in all pruning operations. This establishes how much pruning is to be done. Pruning Objectives Pruning objectives should be established prior to beginning any pruning operation. A300 provides two basic objectives. Hazard Reduction Pruning Hazard reduction pruning (HRP) is recommended when the primary objective is to reduce the danger to a specific target caused by visibly defined hazards in a tree. For example, HRP may be the primary objective if a tree had many dead limbs over a park bench. Maintenance Pruning Maintenance pruning (MP) is recommended when the primary objective is to maintain or improve tree health and structure, and includes hazard reduction pruniri.g. An example here might be to perform a MP operation on a front yard tree. Pruning Types Hazard reduction pruning and maintenance pruning should consist of one or more of the pruning types noted below. Crown cleaning....Crown cleaning shall consist of the selective removal of one or more of the following items: dead, dying, or diseased branches, weak branches and watersprouts. Crown thinning....Crown thinning shall consist of the selective removal of branches to increase light penetration, air movement, and reduce weight. Crown raising....Crown raising shall consist of the removal of the lower branches of a tree to provide clearance. Crown Reduction, or Crown Shaping....Crown Reduction decreases the height and/or spread of a tree. Consideration should be given to the ability of a species to sustain this type of pruning. Vista Pruning....Vista Pruning is selective thinning of framework limbs or specific areas of the crown to allow a view of an object from a predetermined point. Crown Restoration....Crown Restoration pruning should improve the structure, form and appearance of trees which have been severely headed, vandalized, or storm damaged. - over - 11 Example Specifications Tree: 24 inch dbh Oak in back yard of residence. Maintenance Prune - Crown clean 2 inches or greater, crown thin branch in east side over pool. Ail/ 4 ti.. Trees: Nine, 20 to 25 inch silver maples on `\ lifie ft ' xj_ street. Hazard Reduction Prune - Crown clean 3 inches or greater, . \ #0 / / Crown raise to 15 feet (Figures 1 & 2). # - Tree: 30 inch White Pine in back yard, overlooking sea. Maintenance Prune - Crown Clean 2 inches or greater, Vista Prune south side to improve view of sea. `�- Tree: 10 inch Redbud in front yard. Main- tenance Prune-Crown thin, 1/2 inch or greater. Figure 1 (above). Tree•before pruning. Tree: 19 inch red maple in back yard. Haz- Figure 2 (below). Tree after Hazard and Reduction Prune - Crown clean Reduction Prune - Crown clean 3 inches dead wood only 2 inches or greater, or greater, Crown raise to 15 feet Crown reduction prune away from antenna on house. The American National Standard for tree pruning is ANSI A300.Its development process was approved by the American Na- . tional Standards In- stitute. This Arun- �"-�'�' ing standard should 'R it/� be followed where ` z \‘‘‘,. possible in all prun- ing situations to re- : ` main consistent with o industry standards. • R Z1;���:::K.".'"°°'y Please note that the c, s.,..a...<-."' A300 standard has ; `[211 been drafted to ad- 110 dress pruning speci- a' —`--- fications across all _geographic areas. Knowledge of the growth habits of certain tree NI species within a given environment may alter how �'" the recommendations of A300 are interpreted. NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION Standard for Fertilizing Shade & Ornamental Trees (Revised 1987) INTRODUCTION This standard serves to provide a guide in drafting specifications for the application of fertilizer to shade and ornamental trees as well as a standard of practice. Trees in the forest or commercial nursery, either field or container grown, may have different environmental considerations and are not addressed in this standard. It is suggested that the entire text be read before specifications are developed.All of the following should be included:soil test, type of fertilizer, fertilizer analysis, rate of application, time of year, and method of application. The purpose of fertilizing landscape plants is to maintain satisfactory vigor, promote healthy growth, assist the plant in overcoming the adverse effects of diseases or insects,or to correct mineral element deficiencies. Plants require at least sixteen chemical elements for proper growth and development. Three of these elements — carbon, hydrogen and oxygen — are provided by air and water:the other essential elements are obtained by the roots from the soil.Nitrogen is used in large amounts by plants,is easily leached and often volatile. It may be necessary to apply nitrogen annually or biennially.Variations in methods and recommendations are expected in different regions. Therefore, it is recommended that soil be tested every two to three years.The test will report quantities of chemical elements:calcium, phosphorus,potassium and magnesium. The test will also provide a pH reading,which is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of the soil.The actual soil pH influences nutrient absorption and plant growth through the effect of hydrogen ions on nutrient availability. Each essential nutrient is only available to plants within a specific pH range. The presence of a chemical element(nutrient)in the soil is no guarantee that it is in a soluble form available for plant absorption. The concentration of hydrogen and associated ions affects soil reaction and the formation of soluble and insoluble compounds. All nutrients must be in solution to be available for root absorption. Foliar analysis for determination of chemical element needs is recommended for trees showing specific nutrient deficiencies. It is possible to have a soil test indicate that adequate levels of all nutrients are present in a soil and still have nutrient deficiency symptoms appear on a plant. The nutrient may occur in a form that is unavailable to the plant. There may also be physical problems within the soil, such as compaction, poor drainage, or poor aeration that can affect nutrient absorption. SECTION A: TYPES OF FERTILIZER Organic Fertilizer — is that categorized as derived from a plant, animal or synthetic organic source. Nitrogen (N) occurs naturally in organic fertilizers (manures), and gradually becomes available for plant use as the material is reduced by microorganisms. Synthetic organic nitrogen fertilizers are created by coating urea with sulphur or resin-like materials which make the material slowly available for plant use. Organic fertilizers are characterized by a slow rate of nitrogen release, long residual, low burn and root injury potential, and low water solubility. The higher efficiency of slow release fertilizers means less nitrogen runoff to contribute to pollution of streams and subsurface water.The unit cost of slow release fertilizer absorbed by the plant is actually lower than that of readily available materials. II. Inorganic(Chemical) Fertilizer— is that derived from chemical sources. These nutrients are readily available in the soil and are rapidly soluble, with a short residual period. III. Soluble Fertilizer—is mixed with water and applied in liquid form.Soluble fertilizers may be applied to the foliage,to the soil via the deep root feeding method, or as a soil drench treatment. Soluble fertilizers are usually inorganic and readily available, but may be organic and slowly available. Materials with a limited solubility that dissolve slowly are often listed on fertilizer labels as water insoluble nitrogen — WIN (See EXAMPLE I, page C-5 for WIN calculations). SECTION B: FERTILIZER ANALYSIS I. New Plantings — use a high phosphorus fertilizer to assist in plant establishment, such as those with nitrogen, phosphorus and potash (N-P-K) ratios of 0-20-0, 0-46-0, 4-12-4, or 5-10-5. C-1 II. Established Plantings—use fertilizers with N-P-K ratios of 3-1-2 or 3-1-1 for best response. These formulations may be supplemented with trace elements as local conditions dictate. Nitrogen fertilizers such as 21-0-0, 38-0-0 or 45-0-0 can be applied if soil analysis indicates no other nutrients are required. Inorganic (water soluble) nitrogen fertilizers should be applied annually. Very little available nitrogen remains in the soil from year to year, since most of it is either used by plants when available or carried away by water. Synthetic or organic nitrogen (WIN) may be applied biennially due to its slow availability. Phosphorus and potassium are chemically bound to the soil and become slowly available through several growing seasons. They should be included in fertilizer application in most cases, every 2-3 years in either spring or fall, whichever is more convenient. In light-textured or sandy loam soils, potassium must be applied annually. Soil tests every 2-3 years are a must when using nitrogen fertilizers. SECTION C: RATES OF APPLICATION Importance of Proper Rates— the rates suggested in this Standard should only be used as a guideline for fertilizing trees. Specific soils and foliar test recommendations from university or private testing labs should be followed when available. Good judgement is necessary to determine whether frequency, rate, or methods should vary in given situations.Trees of the same species may respond differently to rates of fertilizer due to location in the landscape,soil conditions, rainfall, and other environmental factors. Actual fertilizer rates should be adjusted after considering on-site inspections of foliage color, previous stem or twig growth, general health of the tree,or other environmental factors. I Transplanting—fertilization at time of transplanting is recommended to assist in plant re-establishment and to supply phosphorus necessary for root growth because that element moves very slowly in soils. Apply 10 lbs. of phosphate- containing fertilizer, such as 0-20-20, 0-46-0, 4-12-4, or 5-10-5 per cubic yard of backfill. A rate of 10 lbs. of super phosphate per cubic yard is approximately equal to 0.5 lb. fertilizer per bushel of backfill. II. Established Plantings — a) Square foot method— For optimum plant growth, it is generally recommended to apply 3 lbs.of actual nitrogen per 1,000 sq. ft. of area under the branch spread of the tree per year, or 6 lbs. every two years. If foliage color, annual growth or general vigor is not normal, increase annual application rate to 5-6 lbs. The surface area under the circular branch spread of a tree can be calculated as follows: Surface area = Radius2 x 3.14, The radius is the distance from the trunk to the edge of the branch spread.As an example,a tree with a total branch spread of 36 feet would have a radius of 18 feet. The area, according to the formula, would equal 18 x 18 x 3.14, or 1,017 sq. ft. Considering the recommendation of 3 lbs. of actual nitrogen per 1,000 sq. ft., one would apply about 17 lbs. of 18-5-11 fertilizer: 3.0 _0.18 x 16.6 lbs. Caution: If the area under the circular branch spread contains impervious surfaces, such as walks, drives, and foundations, then judgement should be exercised as to whether to use the square foot method for calculation. Reduced soil area does not diminish a tree's need for fertilizer: however, over-application of fertilizer can cause sod and tree root damage. Alternative fertilizing methods may have to be utilized. b) Diameter Breast High (DBH) — Measure the trunk diamater at 41/2 feet above grade. Generally for optimum growth,apply'1.lb.actual nitrogen per inch DBH to trees under 6 inches in diameter.The rate can be increased to 1/2 lb. N per inch DBH for most trees over 6 inches DBH. Fertilizing trees using the DBH formula results in similar quantities as the surface area method. Using the same 6 inch DBH tree as above and fertilizing with '/2 lb.actual N per inch DBH would require 16.7 lbs. of 18-5-11: 6 inches(dia.) x 0.5 lb./inch(rate) = 3.0 lb.(amount of N). 3.0 lb.(amount of N) _ 0.18 (°i0N in 18-5-11) = 16.7 lbs. of 18-5-11. Caution: With trees growing in restricted areas such as sidewalk strips, planters, etc. the square foot method is preferable to the DBH method. c) Liquid application— Dilute fertilizer solutions should be applied at the rate recommended by the manufacturer according to operating pressure and flow rate of the equipment to be used. Apply sufficient liquid mixture to supply the required rate of fertilizer as determined by the surface area of DBH method. It is suggested that one apply 150 gallons to each 2,000 sq. ft. of surface area Inject approximately y2 gallon of fertilizer solution per injection at 21/2 ft. spacings. C-2 1 Square foot method: Apply 5 lbs. of N per 1,000 sq. ft. to trees on the lawn using 32-7-7 formulated fertilizer. Calculation: 5.0 (lbs. N) _ .32 (% N) = 15.6 (lbs. 32-7-7 fertilizer) 15.6 lbs. fertilizer x 2 = 31 lbs. of fertilizer added to each 150 gal. of water. Each 150 gal. of water covers 2,000 sq. ft. if pump pressure is 150 Igs. and injection spacing is 21/2 ft. The pump can be calibrated by counting the seconds it takes to pump 1/2 gallon of solution into a bucket. Each operator should calibrate his pump, counting off the seconds, and use this same count and cadence while injecting the probe into the soil. 2. Diameter at Breast Height Method: Apply 1/2 lb. of N per caliper inch to trees on lawn using a 32-10-5 formulated fertilizer. Calculation: .5 (amount of N/inch cal.0 _ .32 (% of N in 32-10-5) = 15.6 lb. of fertilizer. 15.6 lbs. of fertilizer x 2 = 31 lbs. of fertilizer added to each 150 gal. of water and applied as per grid above in surface application problem. SECTION D: TIMING OF FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS All of the following guidelines are subject to regional and climatological differences.Autumn is an ideal time to fertilize,generally after the first hard freeze and until the moisture in the soil freezes and root activity ceases. In the southern areas of the country where the ground does not freeze.root growth in many cases will continue all winter long.Early spring,before budbreak is also an appropriate time.When leaves have fully expanded, fertilizing can continue until early July. However, treatments of readily available inorganic nitrogen between July and September could promote a late flush of growth which may not harden off before freezing temperatures in autumn, and injury could occur. Mid to late-summer fertilizer applications should be limited to correcting specific element deficiency problems. SECTION E: METHODS OF FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS I Surface applications—Fertilizer is placed in a spreader calibrated to apply the proper amount of material per 1,000 sq. ft.Care should be taken to avoid excessive overlapping.The application can be made in either concentric circles or in linear strips starting 2 or 3 feet from the trunk out to 5 to 10 feet beyond the drip line of the tree. Only fertilizer sources that contain nitrogen alone should be surface applied.Fertilizer should be applied when grass blades are dry. After the fertilizer has been distributed, it should be washed off the grass blades immediately, using a lawn sprinkler or irrigation system. Fertilizer remaining on grass blades that become wet following a light rain or dew formation occasionally causes burning. To prevent the soil from becoming deficient in phosphorus or potassium following annual surface applications of nitrogen, it is desirable to add these nutrients as needed according to soil analysis. Without soil reports, the NAA suggests phosphorus at 3.6 lbs.of phosphoric acid (P205) per 1,000 sq. ft.and potassium at 6 lbs.of potash (K20) per 1,000 sq. ft. Phosphorus will not burn grass if used at recommended rates. Phosphorus should be applied with the drill hole or liquid injection method because it is so insoluble and does not move down to the roots if applied as a surface treatment. Caution: potassium and nitrogen may burn turfgrass when applied at recommended rates. Irrigation of lawn areas should follow surface applications of these fertilizers. II. Drill Hole Method—The drill holes should be placed in concentric circles in the soil around the tree beginning 2-3 feet or more from the trunk and extending 5-10 feet or more beyond the drip line. Space holes 2 feet apart and drill them 8-15 inches deep, depending upon the tree species, root growth patterns, and type of soil in the root area. The recommended rate of fertilizer should be uniformly distributed among the holes. Depending on the diameter of the hole,it can be filled following fertilization with peat moss,calcine clay,perlite,small crushed stone,sand,or other soil amendment. If the area beneath the spread of the branches is restricted, reduce the application in proportion to the area or number of holes that cannot be made. Use a suitable measuring device and a funnel to apply the fertilizer in the holes. If desirable in sodded areas,the holes may be closed by pressing from different angles with the heel of the worker's shoe,or by cutting and lifting a plug of grass, filling the hole to within 4 inches of the top,adding soil and replacing the plug. Keep the fertilizer at least 4 inches below the top of the hole in turf areas to prevent burning of the grass by dehydration.Irrigation following fertilizer application will help prevent ioj try to turf;however,do not flood the area,as dissolved fertilizer may be carried to the surface and cause turf injury. C-3 When fertilizing trees that contain shrub or herbaceous plant beds within the root area of trees.care must be taken not to punch holes closer than 6 inches to the crown of small plants. Azaleas and other plants have been injured or killed by fertilizer in holes placed too close to the plants The opening of the soil that results from use of the drill hole method allows for penetration of both water and air Hits increase in soil oxygen supply is often as valuable as the addition of fertilizer. III Liquid Injection Method — Injections using a soil probe or lance should be 21/2 feet apart, and 8-12 inches deep for trees. Begin lance injection 2-3 feet from the tree trunk, and work out 5-10 feet beyond the drip line of the branches Use a hydraulic sprayer at 100-200 lbs. pressure and a soil lance designed for liquid fertilizer with a manual shut off valve and three or four horizontal discharge holes at 90 degrees in its point. Inject half a gallon of fertilizer solution into each hole. The addition of water to dry soil as occurs during the liquid injection process is an excellent side-benefit IV Foliar Sprays—To correct minor element deficiencies, spraying liquid fertilizer on the foliage should be considered, especially for correcting iron deficiency using chelated iron This method should not be regarded as an adequate means of providing all the necessary mineral eV nts required by major element-deficient plants in the amounts necessary for satisfactory growth. Micronutrient spray applications are most effective when made just before or during a period of active growth,usually from spring to early summer Response,as indicated by greening of chlorotic foliage and normal growth coming from buds on affected shoots.is usually observed from 2 to 8 weeks after treatment, but response time varies. Factors in response time include the plant species, age of plant and its parts, time of year, severity of the deficiency and soil conditions under which plants are growing. One or two applications during the year will generally prevent or control deficiencies. but under some conditions, it may be necessary to make several treatments annually to maintain healthy growth. J Trunk Injections and Implants — These methods are used for specific element deficiencies, particularly iron or manganese, as well as for trees growing where there is restricted soil surface area under the drip line Injections or implants should be made as low as possible on the trunk. Normally,this is done with a clean,sharp drill of the appropriate size. Capsules should be implanted beneath the bark and completely into the xylem tissue. Early spring before growth starts is the best time for trunk implants and injections. Wound closure is most rapid from spring treatment Trees under 4 inches in diameter should not be treated with injection or capsule implants Do not inject or implant when soil moisture is low as severe foliar burning may occur SECTION F: ADDITIONAL FERTILIZER GUIDELINES Proper and timely applications of fertilizer will produce beneficial results on most trees. Newly established trees will grow more apidly following fertilization with a nutrient or combination of nutrients that previously were present in only limited amounts in the soil. The results are shown in increased leaf size, length of current season twig growth, and more rapid increase in height Slow-growing tree species may also be stimulated to grow faster by fertilizing. Abnormal leaf color and small leaf size often indicate nutrient deficiencies in the soil.Various colors or patterns of color indicate deficiencies of specific essential nutrients. The leaves of many trees become darker green following fertilization, making them more conspicuous and attractive. Fertilizing can help maintain mature trees in a vigorous growing condition. A vigorously growing tree is more winter hardy and ess susceptible to many diseases and insect pests than is a less vigorous tree. Canker-causing fungi occur more commonly in weakened trees.Also,many of the non-infectious tree diseases develop when soil nutrient,oxygen and moisture conditions are unfavorable. Healthy.vigorous trees tend to resist borers.while those growing under unfavorable moisture or nutrient conditions are more susceptible to attack by these insects. Established trees weakened by leaf diseases, insect defoliation, mechanical injury, soil compaction, drought, or other causes often show reduced twig and trunk growth or dying of branch ends. Fertilizing may stimulate additional growth so that the plant can compensate for the adverse conditions that caused decline. I To Prevent Plant Injury—Avoid use of lawn fertilizer/herbicide combinations where the roots of desirable and sensitive vegetation could pick up herbicide Herbicides for use around trees should be applied separately at the rates suggested on the label II Fertilizing Sensitive Plants— a) When fertilizing American Beech and broadleaf evergreens,reduce applications of inorganic fertilizers to one-half the label-recommended rates of fertilizer, or use slow-release materials instead. b) Be aware that over-fertilizing small trees such as flowering crabapples can result in excessive succulent growth. Succulent growth is more prone to fireblight symptoms on susceptible plants such as pear, Jonathan apple and mountain ash C-4 III. Fertilize in Moist Soils— Fertilizer should always be applied to moist soils to enhance fertilizer uptake, reduce fertilizer injury to plants.and aid in soil injection or drill hole treatments. If soils are not moist,irrigation should precede fertilization to moisten the plant root zone area.The liquid injection method of fertilizing trees and shrubs will help moisten the soil in the root zone while applying desired nutrients. The benefits of water in dry soil will reduce nutrient as well as moisture stress. IV. Fertilizing Excessively Wet Soils—Avoid fertilizing trees growing in soil that is excessively wet. The roots in wet soil are often damaged from lack of oxygen caused by the accumulation of toxic gases. Adding fertilizer in any form may contribute to root injury. V. Read the Label—Read the entire label of any fertilizer product before application,and apply per label recommendations. EXAMPLE Slow release fertilizer is measured by the percentage of water insoluble nitrogen,(WIN).Use the following formula to determine the percentage of water insoluble nitrogen in a bag of fertilizer: of WIN x 100 = %of N that is slow release of total N Example for a fertilizer label that reads 32-7-7: Guaranteed Analysis Total Nitrogen (N)....32% Water Insoluble Nitrogen....12.5% Nitrate Nitrogen....2.0% Water Soluble Nitrogen....17.5% Available Phosphoric Acid....7% Soluble Potash....7% 12.5°/o of WIN x 100 lbs. of fertilizer _ 390/0 32%of total N 39%of the available N is slow release SELECTED REFERENCES KUHNS. LARRY J. 1985. Fertilizing Woody Ornamentals. Cooperative Extension Service. The Penn State University NEELY, DAN. 1980. Tree Fertilizing Trials. Illinois Journal of Arboriculture: 6(10). NEELY, DAN and E. B. Himelick. 1971. Fertilizing and Watering Trees. Illinois Natural History Survey Circular#52. RATHJENS,RICHARD and Roger Funk. 1984.Guide to Turf, Trees and Ornamental Fertilization.Weeds,Trees&Turf Magazine (October). SMITH. ELTON M. 1978. Fertilizing Trees and Shrubs in the Landscape. Journal of Arboriculture: 4(7). This Standard was revised in 1987 with the assistance of: Dr. Elton M. Smith, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH C-5 NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION Standard For Hydraulic Sprayer Calibration INTRODUCTION This guide is provided by the NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION as a supplement to NAA's video program,"ON TARGET" as well as NAA-sponsored Pesticide Application and Calibration Seminars. A successful pesticide application must achieve the desired controls while,at the same time,be environmentally sound as well as cost effective. Pesticides must reach and adequately cover the target. Pesticide movement off the target, drift, must be avoided Cost effectiveness requires the minimum use of chemicals and the most efficient use of application equipment. The applicator's ability to achieve a successful application is dependent upon three variables. 1. Using the proper spray equipment; including plumbing, hoses, and fittings. 2. Proper calibration of the application equipment. 3. Proper application technique. The equipment used to spray trees, especially tall trees, must be designed with proper plumbing, hoses, etc. to allow the pesticide applicator to utilize the full potential of the spray unit.Each part of the spray unit on both the intake and output side of the pump must meet specific requirements and be functioning properly in order to achieve maximum spray height with minimal pesticide waste and equipment wear. Proper calibration of the hydraulic sprayer assures that the optimum spray volume and pressure are available at the gun and that the spray unit is operating at peak efficiency.With the knowledge gained from reading this manual,the applicator can select the appropriate discs/tips and set the required pump pressure for the needs at hand. While tall trees may require a large disc or tip on the gun for maximum spray output, smaller trees and shrubs will not. The applicator should know how and when to change to the optimum size necessary while in the field to get the job done efficiently and economically. Application technique is extremely important.An applicator must know where to stand to get maximum coverage, how to hold the spray gun, and when to reduce the volume. These techniques must be fully understood and used as needed. CALIBRATION PROCEDURE The following procedure will allow the pesticide applicator to calibrate a hydraulic sprayer for each spray gun disc or tip that may be appropriate for different types of tree and shrub spraying,and will provide the information necessary for determining when to change discs or tips in the field. 1. Determine the optimum spray pressure to be achieved at the spray gun as recommended by the manufacturer,or follow the guidelines in this manual.Certain gun pressures are recommended because greater pressures will create smaller droplets and greater dispersion,or drift,and decrease maximum spray column height. Lower pressures,on the other hand.do not allow the sprayer to achieve the maximum spray column height with a given disc/tip. A. Bean 785 or 786 guns with discs#12 to #22 @ 400 PSI, and with discs #4 to #10 @ 300 PSI. B. Green Garde JD9-C, all tips, @ 300 PSI. 2. Select the discs or tips to be calibrated for from those sizes which are appropriate for the hydraulic sprayer being used. Be sure that the flow capacity(output)of each selected disc/tip does not exceed the flow capacity of the spray unit's pump(see Table I). Please note that smaller discs/tips have lower flow capacities (GPM) than larger discs/tips. Therefore, use the smallest disc/tip that can give thorough coverage with minimum movement off target. This minimizes chemical waste. EXAMPLE: A#22 disc which has a flow capacity of 52.5 gallons per minute (GPM) at 400 PSI would exceed the output capacity of a 50 GPM or smaller pump. EXAMPLE: If a plant can be adequately covered using an FMC or Bean 785 or 786 gun and#12 disc at 13.9 GPM,or Green Garde J09-C gun and LX tip at 11.4 GPM,there is no reason to use a larger disc,such as a#16 which pumps,out 26.5 GPM —twice the volume of material to do the same job. E-1 • 3. Determine the output or capacity of the disc or tip selected in gallons per minute(GPM) from Table I. 4. Establish the pressure loss caused by friction between the pump and the gun for each selected disc/tip so that the pressure at the pump can be adjusted to compensate. Table I Disc/Tip Capacity Gun type Pr•ssur• At Disc/Tlp Disc/Tip Gun (pal) Size Capacity(gpm) FMC 785/786 400 «22 52.5 «18 34.0 «16 26.5 «14 21.1 «12 13.9 300 «10 8.1 «8 5.2 «6 3.0 «4 1.3 Green Garde JD9-C LX 11.4 L 4.5 M 2.9 A. Determine the inside diameter of the spray hose. B. Determine the pressure loss per 50 feet of that size hose. See Table II. Table II Pressure Loss Per 50 Feet Of Hose (psi) Gun Pr•saur• At Disc 3/8' 1/2' 6/8' 3/4' 1• lyP• Gun(psi) Size (psi) (pal) (pal) (pal) (pal) FMC 785/786 400 •22 • • 400 150 40 •16 • 450 160 60 18 •16 • 275 100 42 10 •14 190 65 25 6 •12 400 90 30 12 3 300 •10 165 35 13 4.8 1.3 •8 60 14 5 2 X •6 22 6 2 X X •4 5 1 X X X Green Garde J09-C LX 290 60 20 8 2 L 44 11 3.9 1.6 X M 20 5 1.6 X X NOTES: This information was taken from data gathered by the Gates Rubber Company. Where an asterisk (') appears, the pressure is so great that it would be inappropriate to use this diameter hose. Where an X appears, the pressure loss is either too small to measure or zero. Using a#16 disc as an example,Table II indicates that with 400 PSI at the gun, 42 PSI per 50 feet of 3/." hose is lost. C. Measure the length of the hose in use from the pump to the gun. For every 50 foot length of equal diameter hose, the pressure loss will have to be compensated for by a given amount at the pump in order to achieve the desired pressure at the gun. EXAMPLE: If the sprayer is equipped with 300 feet of 1/4" hose, that is the same as six 50 foot lengths. The pump pressure would have to be increased by 252 pounds to offset the 42 PSI pressure loss for each of the six 50 foot lengths: 6 x 42 = 252. D. Count the number of hose couplings including the coupling at the pump and the coupling at the gun. Determine the pressure loss for each hose coupling from Table III.The total pressure loss for all hose couplings will also need to be compensated for at the pump. Note:Where two sections of hose are coupled together,there are two couplings;one female and one male. E-2 Table Ill Pressure Loss For Hose Couplings (Each) Hos• Couplings 1.0. Gun Pressure At Disc 3/8' 1/2' 5/8' 3/4' 1' type Gun (psi) Slze (PO (psi) (psi) (Psi) (psi) FMC 785/786 400 622 • • 20 8 2 •18 • 22 8 3 1 •16 14 5 2 .5 614 10 3 1.5 .5 •12 20 6 1.5- .6 X 300 61.082 10 8 1.5 .5 X X •6 3 .6 X X X •6 1 X X X X •4 x x x x x Green Garde .109-C LX 14 3 1 X X L 2 .5 X X X r M X X X X X EXAMPLE:Table III indicates that a hydraulic sprayer equipped with a 3/4" hose and a#16 disc would have a pressure loss of 2 lbs. for each coupling. If there were 2 couplings, 4 PSI would be added at the pump: 2 PSI for each If a hydraulic sprayer was equipped with 100 feet of 1"hose and 200 feet of hose, and the gun had a#18 disc, the pressure loss would be 1 PSI for each 1" coupling, and 3 PSI for each 3" coupling as indicated in Table III. E. If a hose reel and/or meter is being used, an additional 10 PSI loss for each must be compensated for at the pump. F. To determine the pressure needed at the pump to achieve the desired PSI at the gun, add the following: Desired pressure at the gun Pressure loss for hose Loss for couplings Loss for reel or meter Total pressure required Adjust the pressure regulator or relief valve accordingly. EXAMPLE:Suppose that you want to calibrate a sprayer with 300 feet of 3/4" hose with 4 couplings,a hose reel,and a #16 disc in a Bean 786 gun: 1. The pressure loss per 50 feet of hose,as shown in Table II, is 42 PSI. The pressure loss for the entire 300 foot length is: 42 PSI x 6= 252 PSI 2. The pressure loss per coupling is 2 PSI each from Table III. The pressure loss for 4 couplings is: 2 PSI x 4 = 8 PSI 3. The pressure loss for a hose reel is: 10 PSI 4. The desired gun pressure is: 400 PSI 5. Total = pressure setting required at pump- 670 PSI 5. There is another method for calibrating a sprayer: A. Install a pressure gauge in a T-fitting between the end of the hose and the spray gun. B. Determine the optimum spray gun operating pressure as recommended in this manual, or by the manufacturer. C. Select the disc/tip you wish to calibrate for.Be sure that the output capacity does not exceed the output capacity of the spray unit. See Table I. D. With water only in your tank, start your spray unit and pressurize the system. E. With the spray gun open, note the pressure at the gun. F. Adjust the pump pressure with the gun open until the desired pressure is reached at the gun. G. Close the gun and read the pressure on the gauge at the pump.This is the pressure setting required at the pump when the gun is closed to'attain the desired pressure at the gun with the gun open. 6. Once the pump setting for a given disc/tip size has been established,estimate the spray column height that can be reached with that particular disc/tip and pressure setting. E-3 A. One suggested method for measuring spray column height is to compare the height of the spray against an object of known height, such as a tree or building. There are several more accurate methods for measuring the height of an object such as using a clinometer,a device similar to a camera range finder. B. Compare estimates of spray column height with Table IV, which represents industry averages. Table IV Approximate Spray Column Height Allahable WIN Each Mac Or Tlp Size Bean 785/786 Gun Green Garde JD9-C At 400 psi At 300 psi DISC COLUMN HEIGHT TIP COLUMN HEIGHT 022 90 Feet Plus LX 40 Feet N 18 80 Feet Plus L 30 Feet 016 65 - 90 Feet M 25 Feet 014 50 - 75 Feet S 24 Feet 012 35 - 50 Feet SX 22 Feet Bean 785/786 Gun At 300 psi 110 Up To 40 Feet 7. Repeat this procedure for all disc/tip sizes appropriate for the hydraulic sprayer being calibrated. Record the data generated on a table such as the following,or a decal,and keep it on the unit for reference.Unless the hose length,hose size,or number of couplings change,the information will be a handy reference.When changes occur,the unit will have to be re-calibrated. SPRAY CALIBRATION Disc/Tip Size Disc Capacity Pump Pressure Approximate Height GPM PSI FT. PERIODICALLY, A HYDRAULIC SPRAYER SHOULD BE CALIBRATED BY BOTH METHODS TO BE CERTAIN THAT EVERYTHING IS CORRECT. The mathematical calculations only will not reveal what the actual pressure is at the gun, only what it should be Use of the pressure gauge between the hose and the gun by itself will not tell you if your equipment is functioning properly. If both methods of calibration are used and there is a significant difference between the calculated and actual pump pressure and/or, if the hydraulic spray doesn't reach the approximate heights that it should, check the following: 1. Pump and engine RPM 2. Engine to pump pulley ratio* 3. Pump piston packing 4. Pump valve malfunction 5. Relief valve malfunction E-4 6. Small plumbing I.D. (causing restriction) 7. Suction line(intake) restrictions 8. Discharge side restrictions; including hose, couplings,washers and swivels 9. Other obstructions and restrictions 10. Leaks in the system f no equipment problems are found, check the calculations and calibration again to ensure that no errors were made. rAUT!ON:The smaller the disc or tip,the smaller the droplet size.Smaller droplets weigh less and are more affected by wind, rhich could result in spray drift. Under such conditions, using a disc larger than the minimum size listed in Table IV may be lesirable. EXAMPLE: If the tree to be sprayed is 70 feet tall, under most conditions a #16 tip will reach the top. However, if wind conditions are such that larger droplet size will reduce the possibility of drift,a.larger disc or tip can be used and pump pressure adjusted accordingly. Under such circumstances the operator must be careful not to allow the spray to go over the top of the tree. SPRAYER CALIBRATION WORK SHEET 1. Disc/tip size to be calibrated: _ 2. Determine optimum pressure at gun: 3. Capacity of disc/tip in gallons per minute. Table I: 4. Inside diameter of hose: 5. Pressure loss per 50 ft. of hose. Table II: 6. Number of feet of hose: 7. Divide Item 6 by 50 ft.: 8. Total pressure loss for hose. Item (5) multiplied by Item (7): 9. Number of hose couplings: 10. Pressure loss per coupling. Table III: 11. Total pressure loss for couplings. Item (9) multiplied by Item (10): 12. Add 10 PSI for hose reel: (if present) 13. Add 10 PSI for meter: (if present) 14. Total pressure loss. Add Items (8) + (11) + (12) + (13): _ 15. Pressure needed at pump. Add Items (2) and (14): 16. Maximum spray height reached with this disc/tip and pressure setting: ADDITIONAL PESTICIDE APPLICATION GUIDELINES The National Arborist Association has produced a three part video presentation,called"ON TARGET", that covers Hydraulic Spray Equipment, Hydraulic Sprayer Calibration, and Proper Pesticide Application Techniques for Urban Trees. They are available as a 3 tape set from: The National Arborist Association 174 Route 101 Bedford, N.H. 03102 CREDITS Jack Custer, FMC Corporation Erik H. Haupt, Bartlett Tree Expert Company Walter A. Houston, Encap Products Company Lauren S. Lanphear, Forest City Tree Protection Company E-5 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES rA. . CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DA._: �fi3J9{ STeFr:: • 144 / AP 'CANT: AGENT: 774// Er /VE,I114 Ph—:1 ) Phone: 1 ) ZZI-t — 85-6•0 PRW ERTY LOCATION: -IDRESS: X MAPITAX LOT: ZS/ /t 4 - Luz, i'oo i /Oo N� SSARY APPLICATION(S): / •f LS Vt4oPn42r Re v/E1-41 PR OSAL DESCRIPTION: q 80101/06r & O, CC"''REHENSIVE PL DESIGNATICN: _? ZO VG DESIGNATION: C CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT F4-s7 FACILITATOR: TE I AREA: PHONE 15031 :ONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size:_AV sq. ft. Average lot width: 6O ft. Maximum building height: el-5 ft. Seth cks: front ft. side f ft. rear corner — ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: 9.5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /5 (Refer to Code Steno,.) is.. 4 L{ ) IT) TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 Pi aopucznc uP!ammng Jrovrtnmt Sec¢n r. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQU MENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 et unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wid ccess easement. The depth of all lot shall not exceed 21.1 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the mini um lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots) PEr"AL SETBACKS > Streets: 30 feet from the centerline of 61I ➢ Established areas: feet from ➢ Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. i Fiag lot: 10 foot side yard setback. (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) PECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PRO V1S10 1 Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 (half) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zone district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) AF NG AND ACCES Required parking for this type of use: I . 35014FA Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. > Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Y I 1GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 I-Rearaeatial applkIuaruPannoq Ceparanert Setnon Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: ? Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: 2 i All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing are (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) LMLAWAY Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) 4` S-C/S7".",G F-Aeri' r"- L/A2.4x.F a,;Id,.✓4r LNG AREA REQUIREMEN Every commerc.a or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) Jj 3 VISION AR The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) • UFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) IY TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 !!Ra,...ntial eppucatwaPlatnnq Otwmat Secna+ The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. ..••• ft. along east boundary. ft. along south boundary. ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along TRASHolGluJCr _.1SCAPIND Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegeta ivy' ca py effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) iIC..S Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) ;El 1TIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable fcr development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely .-n f -n i 'v- I.n. .r-. .n. -ir .. n.. i- i 2- r- ..n 'Gil of - ...li .n • r-. -- 'n. h- .-fini '.n of -n i 'v- I.n. m • s- I-.rl in.i . -. .n .I.n .min -. wi h - development application. TY TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 a ppucinonJPt3nronq Oeputment Secaan 1 j Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. : .•- u • - - ••11' 11 • • •11.0. '.• - • • • • s •••• • u In most cases, dedication of 100- year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) T,F,—.1 REMOVAL PLAN REQU1REMEN-TS D A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: ➢ Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; ➢ Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) :1T :TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 IO Y.,....Jennal npl+cnona!uvmp Oputrnent Secion r : TI kTION 'eplacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. > If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. > If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. > The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. 'Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) R^"T rhe applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider 3n application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) DE SECTIONS 18.80 18.92 • 18.100 i 18.108 r 18.120 % 18.150 18.84 18.96 18.102 _ 18.114 _ 18.130 _ 18.160 18.88 18.98 i 18.106 / 18.116 _ 18.134 _ 18.162 / 18.164 IGutIORHOOD MEET RI rhe applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between he mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout :oncerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your 'pplication or the application will not be accepted. OF ;ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 esid it acocnonnPlvm.+q Department:ectan . applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) DDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: IC EDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. 'PL,CAT'.ON SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE; Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. 1..11 •. wi LS •- - • - a . g 'r -es .u • •• •r 4- • •I< • - Y C IGAf ' Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 3 Ruidanual+oc aaorManrnq Qeyuonms Sedan Macs ubmitted with an aor)tion shall beJolded IN ADVANCE73.5 by 11 inches. One 8 inch • I •- • - • • . . 1 1 1 - I • I - • • • •• I • • • 11 I C • • • I •• . I .1 • I I • • - • I$ • • /. 1 • • - . - • . • The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard >1 P(4A4//+v r (c t eli557a.V . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available frcm the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) is/are required if an application(s) is/are to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: A Au Z 4AJO CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 •loc ,arty\masters'.preaco-c.rnst ngineenng Section:masters'creapp-c.engl TY TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 3 IH R.....aaaal a pphcancn4Panranq Oeflarnent Set-non Ai; City of Tigard, Oregon PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION PI UC FACIUT1ES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City-staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a prcection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. • Approval of a development application e.,ok. (-al for this site will ceequirree�right-of-way dedicaticn for. ( to feet from centerline. ),3( to feet from centerline. Street improvements- (1.) street improvements will be necessary along (pelfr4 Eck c 4-- s sS9- rxi?z4 5-1 cE soe-3 1l-- (2.) � `!z street improvements will be necessary along (-14T4 sibG 0•A ri- -6 T-53 (3.) Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters. storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the tve . Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. IT TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes I Page 1 of 3 orate,s«:;on In some cases, where street`',rovements or other necessary pu.l improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development . approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: (1.) (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in pS' P U T ' ir.- ( The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary Aewer. It is the developer's responsibility to &-D Flu-- Sz j [F R }''2`-( Q. C44 t•Sx; .CcISD - R=ic — _ . • Water Supply: (V-r. The Water t- Phone:(503) (039 -4-11( provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: TY TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 3 pneenny eat Secaon atorm sewer improvements: �` n -rte LS Xi So l 5 +-k �� -r 5 �°-� c e pL7 PP-4afcrc, IALC- 04-5Ks f -'S' N`s- - VsL ts.„--7-) -cc e'- i AA C Pc�-7t 0204.-1.444e I"C M WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. F lue 66-s) . ZA =1C IMPACT FEES f In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. Tne applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land. the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The T1F shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the T1F is greater than $5,000.00. p-( F6 'REET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be performed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. �1;.. JED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan For each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. Tc 2— .r (_. li'e&-A P—E. � PREPARED BY: • ENGINEERING DEP RTMENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 ;tnti rlpreapo.eng :era Ian:preaco-'.rrut) 23.1996 01 GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3 avn utn.nt S c n rThj CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAIt1MENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the CIty of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: W//DAM)RE,,4 Date: 41C/96 II APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMIENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS 11 A) Application form (1 copy) 8) Owner's signature/written authorization t C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies iS E) Filing Fee S S • FE FEE scAerrxE SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(5IPLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE /MARKED ITEMSi A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies // 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) e' 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: . (a) Floodplain areas 0 (b) Slopes in excess of 25% (c) Unstable ground C (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils . o 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings C (b) Trees with 6" _ caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ye 8. Location of existing structures and their uses ❑ 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND LSE.1?QUC T:CN/US. PACE OF 3 B) Site Development PI` CI. of Copies N 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals rr 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ta° (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension o 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site e' (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Lcad:rg and. services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation 0' (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ (f) Above ground utilities tie 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions e' 7. Sanitary sewer facilities e' 8. The location areas to be landscaped ta' 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques Er 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11. The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 12 The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: . (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals er (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE.APPL:CAr;Cry/LIST ?ACC 2 CF 5 LI) pat-111LeCIUrd1 v.ur.u.5.7 .....�......�. r - The site developmenj--tan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ❑ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials c 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation . imate: ❑ H) Preliminary Pa tion/ of Line Ad'ustment Ma. Indicatin-. No. of Copies 1. The owner of the ubject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's auth• ized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20 -0,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of pars-I location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width an. names of streets, easements and other public ways within and ad acent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all per .nent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width •f all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater tha 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing ut lities and utility easements ❑ 11 . For major land partitio which creates a public street: (a) The proposed rig.'t-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-se ion of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed res ictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partiti.n will not preclude efficient future land division where applicabl- ❑ L{v0 LSE aP°I:UTICN/UST PACE 3 CF 3 1. Scale equaling , •,100 or 200 feet to the inch andnited to one phase per sheet o 2. The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showi property's relationship to arterial and collector streets a 4. Names, addresses an. telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer a d designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application a 6. Boundary lines of t . to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent s bdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of n-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades gre:ter than 10% 9. The purpose, locatio , type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the prop..ed subdivision): (a) Public and priv.te right-of-ways and easements a (b) Public and priv.'a sanitary and storm sewer lines o (c) Domestic water ains including fire hydrants o (d) Major power tel :phone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses c (f) Deed reservatio s for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbran es a 10. Approximate plan an. profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe izes indicated on the plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed ater distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves :nd fire hydrants 12. Approximate centerlin- profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extens ons for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision 13. Scaled cross sections •" proposed street right-of-way(s) 0 1.1. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & dir-' ion of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot confi• urations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where H s are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be i dicated upon such lots. a 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground le -I, and the location of proposed tree plantings a 18. The existing uses of the •roperty, including the location of all structures and the present uses of + e structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after plarti ,g ❑ 19. Supplemental informatio including: (a) Proposed deed rest ctions (if any) o (b) Proof of property o nership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for •rovision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features indu ing rock cutcrcppings, wetlands & marsh areas 0 21 . If any of the foregoing info.mation cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall o. incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application a LAND LSE AP°1:C1T;CN!LIST ?.1CZ 4 CF 3 J) Solar Access C culaiiq: Q K) Other Informati No. of Copies o • l elcsin'¢att)'lnastersMdtli1UtKt May 23.1995 taNO LSE.APPLICATION i UST PACE 5 OF 5 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services 1'.O. BOX 641,PORTLAND,OREGON 97207 503/222-7007 Voice M4/1 6.5Yo-zlos(n\ CEi1 tt ZGa6- creq 9 July 26, 1996 City of Tigard Attention: Mr. Will D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Farmers Insurance Property Dear Will: Regarding the subject project, this is to inform you that I have been retained by Mackenzie Saito as Arboricultural Consultant, to serve to completion of the construction project. This letter, in conjunction with the attached Tree Removal Plan, also is submitted to fulfill the Design Review submittal requirements as presented in the pre-application conference notes dated June 13, 1996. As shown on the attached plan, I am told by Mackenzie/Saito that 1) the project proposes retainage of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12" in caliper, which will require 50% of the trees removed to be mitigated, according to Section 18.150.070D, and 2) as indicated on the attached plan, 238 trees are being removed, for a total of 4427 caliper inches, and 3) as required by Code, 50% of the caliper inches must be mitigated. I have discussed the requirements for this tree preservation/removal plan by telephone with Dick Bewersdorff, and with you. In addition I have reviewed with the architects and engineers the tree preservation plan requirements for the City of Tigard. I have also made several site visits which have led me to the opinion that the proposed plans are workable arboriculturally, subject to my input as described herein. My work on the project, briefly described, will be as follows: 1. Develop a comprehensive report on the condition of the existing trees on the site, to satisfy City of Tigard requirements, including present condition, prognosis and the impact of the construction on the trees slated for preservation and the trees in the area generally. INSPECTION.DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF TREES,SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS. e7h.,. 0:.. CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING,TRANSPLANTING.PRESERVATION,MAINTENANCE AND ARBOREAL PLANNING.COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS.DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS . FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES.LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES. Mr. Will D'Andrea Page 2 July 26, 1996 2. Provide input for specifications of tree preservation as necessary on the construction drawings. 3. Work specifically on site with the project manager and the job superintendent to prescribe preventive measures as construction develops on a situational basis, including, but not limited to, the following: a. pre-construction meetings with the construction contractor will be attended as necessary, matter-of-course; b. specific adjustments in locations of landscape islands as possible to accommodate special trees; c. specific recommendations for retaining wall construction and/or aerification systems around certain trees as may be needed; d. situational on-site input to the contractor for special requirements which may develop for tree preservation as the project proceeds; e. any other arboricultural input as may be required during the entire construction process; f. regular on-site monitoring on a frequent basis, and on-call situational input as necessary. g. In addition, I monitor all of my projects one full growing season following completion, to determine therapeutic tree care needs as may be indicated in the tree population. In summary, consultation regarding tree preservation done most effectively should begin early and be followed-through as briefy outlined above, to insure that, insofar as state-of-the-art arboricultural practices can provide, all trees slated for preservation (and worth preserving) will be retained on the site at the completion of the project. That is the intent here. Mr. Will D'Andrea Page 3 July 26, 1996 Please advise me if you have any questions relative to this brief outline of work on the project. I am proceeding with deliberate speed to complete the full tree preservation report. Thank you very much. Sincerely, -I // Vii'/� 4./i .m . Owen, B.S., M.A., C.A. American Society of Consulting Arborists#114 cc: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates Beth Zauner ADDENDUM NO. 1 October 7, 1996 for COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Group Mackenzie Project Number 296044 Addendum Number 1 amends the contract documents for subject project dated September 4, 1996(Site Development Permit)and September 19, 1996(Building Shell Permit). It is the responsibility of the prospective bidders to note the contents of this addendum and that Owner be made aware that the addendum has been received. Acknowledge receipt by inserting the number of this addendum in the space provided on the Bid Proposal Form. The following changes in the contract documents constitute this addendum. All changes by addenda are to be included in proposal form and the contents of addenda become a part of the Contract Documents for this project. All changes offset only the specified drawings, words, or paragraphs mentioned. The balance of the contract documents will remain in full force. Change to Specifications: Section 01019-Contract Considerations: Add Section 1.5,Alternate No. 2,Glazing. Section 08800-Glazing: Add Alternate Glazing Coefficients. Changes to Drawings: Sheet T1.1 Current: Project Information- D: Occupancy Group: F1. Change: Project Information-D: Occupancy Group B. Sheet Cl: 1. Add tax lot line. 2. Change sidewalk orientation in front of Building"A"bike rack location. 3. Add an alternate drive aisle paving section of 3" A.C. pavement over 9" aggregate base over compacted subgrade. Sheet C2: Add tax lot line. Sheet C3: Add tax lot line. Sheet C4.0: Add tax lot line. Sheet C4.1: 1. Change: Moved the fire and domestic waterline approximately 15'north at the south end of the site. 2. Change: Relocated the sanitary sewer stub for the future building pad to the south. 3. Add: Tax lot line change. Sheet C5: 1. Add tax lot line. 2. Add alternate storm line route. 3. Delete: Storm lateral to the west on the south side of storm drain. c: R&H Construction F:\wPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD196044107ADDl.KC COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 SECTION 01019 CONTRACT CONSIDERATIONS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Change procedures. 2. Alternates. B. Related Sections: 1. Section 01300, Submittals: Schedule of Values. 2. Section 01600,Material and Equipment: Product selection. 3. Section 01630,Substitutions and Product Options: Product substitutions and alternatives. 1.2 CHANGE PROCEDURES A. Supplemental Instructions: The Architect/Engineer will advise of minor changes in the work not involving an adjustment to Contract Sum/Price or Contract Time as authorized by AIA A201, 1987 Edition,Paragraph 7.4 by issuing supplemental instructions on AIA Form G710. B. Notice of Change by Architect/Engineer: 1. The Architect/Engineer may issue a Proposal Request which includes a detailed description of a proposed change with supplementary or revised Drawings and specifications. 2. The Proposal Request is not a change order or a direction to proceed with the work. 3. Prepare a construction cost estimate and respond to Proposal Request within 10 days. 4. After review by Architect/Engineer and Owner,Proposal Request may or may not be issued as a CCA,CCD or Change Order. C. Notice of Change by Contractor: 1. The Contractor may propose a change by submitting request for change to the Architect/Engineer, describing the proposed change and its full effect on the work. 2. Include a statement describing the reason for the change,and the effect on the Contract Sum/Price and Contract Time with full documentation and a statement describing the effect on work by separate or other contractors. 3. Document any requested substitutions in accordance with Section 01630, Product Options and Substitutions. 4. Architect/Engineer will assign a Proposal Request number for documentation purposes. D. Construction Change Directive(CCD): 1. ArchitecvEngineer may issue a Change Authorization signed by the Owner, instructing the Contractor to proceed with a change in the work,for subsequent inclusion in a Change Order. 2. Document will describe changes in the work,and designate method of determining any change in Contract Sum/Price or Contract Time. CONTRACT CONSIDERATIONS 01019- 1/3 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-SHELL\01019.WPD COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 3. Promptly execute the change. E. Execution of Change Orders(CO): 1. Execute AIA Document G701,Change Order. 2. Architect/Engineer will issue Change Orders for signatures of parties as provided in Conditions of the Contract. 3. Stipulated Sum Change Order: Based on Proposal Request or Notice of Change and Contractor's price quotation or Contractor's request for a Change Order as approved by Architect/Engineer. 4. Unit Price Change Order: a. For pre-determined unit prices and quantities,the Change Order will be executed on a fixed unit price basis. b. For unit costs or quantities of units of work which are not pre-determined,execute work under a Construction Change Authorization or Construction Change Directive. c. Changes in Contract Sum/Price or Contract Time will be computed as specified for Time and Material Change Order. 5. Time and Material Change Order: a. Submit itemized account and supporting data after completion of change,within time limits indicated in the Conditions of the Contract. b. Architect/Engineer will review and provide a recommendation to the Owner for the change allowable in Contract Sum/Price and Contract Time as provided in the Contract Documents. c. Maintain detailed records of work done on Time and Material basis. d. Provide full information required for evaluation of proposed changes, and to substantiate costs for changes in the work. 1.3 ALTERNATES A. Alternate Procedures: 1. Alternates quoted on Bid Forms will be reviewed and accepted or rejected at the Owner's option. 2. Accepted Alternates will be identified in supplement to Owner-Contractor Agreement. 3. Coordinate related work and modify surrounding work as required. B. Work Adjustments: 1. Adjust work required by the Contract for each Alternate selected by Owner. 2. Included changes in material,equipment,and fabrication. 3. Include change in erection,installation,and fmishing. 4. Adjust work to achieve desired result as indicated on Drawings and specified in the related technical sections for each Alternate selected by Owner. C. Bidder's Requirements: 1. Review Contract Documents for the scope of work required by each Alternate. 2. State Bid Form in space provided the addition to or deduction from the Basic Bid for each Alternate. D. Contractor's Requirements: 1. Alternate Work is outlined in this section and where required for clarity,specified in detail in the work related sections referenced in this section. CONTRACT CONSIDERATIONS 01019-2/3 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-S HELL\O l 01 9.W PD COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 2. Minor adjustment to exposed finished surfaces, or concealed work by the incorporation of the selected Alternates may not be indicated on Drawings or specified in the referenced work related sections. 3. Include adjustments in work as required to achieve the indicated result, consistent with requirements in the Contract Documents. 4. Coordinate work modified by incorporation of selected Alternates. E. Owner's Rights: 1. The Owner reserves the right to accept or reject any one of all of the Alternates, except that rejection of the Basic Bid constitutes rejection of all Alternates. 2. The Owner reserves the right to reinstate Alternate Bids at any time within 30 days after Contract Award. 1.4 ALTERNATE NO. 1,ROOFING A. Base Bid: Built-Up Bituminous Roofing. B. Word Added: Revise roofing system to single-ply EPDM roofing,mechanically attached. C. Referenced Sections: 07510-Built-Up Bituminous Roofing 07533 -Single-Ply Membrane 1.5 ALTERNATE NO. 2, GLAZING A. Base Bid: Insulated Glazing 1. Shading Coefficient: .66 maximum 2. Visible Light Transmittance: 72 percent maximum. B. Word Added: Insulated Glazing 1. Shading Coefficient: .25 to.27 2. Visible Light Transmittance: 34 to 38 percent C. Reference Sections: 08800-Glazing "END OF SECTION" CONTRACT CONSIDERATIONS 01019-3/3 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-SHELL\01019.WPD COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 SECTION 08800 GLAZING PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Primary glass. 2. Processed glass. 3. Insulating glass. 4. Glazing accessories. B. Related Sections: 1. Section 08110,Steel Doors and Frames: Steel door light stops and relite frames. 2. Section 08211,Flush Wood Doors: Wood door light stops. 3. Section 08410,Aluminum Entrances and Storefronts: Aluminum entrance doors and frames. 1.2 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Submit product information on insulated glass systems and glazing accessories. B. Product Samples: Submit two 6 by 6 inch minimum size samples of tinted,low emissivity,reflective, spandrel,and patterned glass. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Regulatory Requirements: 1. Provide safety glass which complies with U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Standard 16CFR 1201 and with ANSI Z97.1. 2. Comply with State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code and Fire and Life Safety Regulations. 1.4 WARRANTY A. Manufacturer's Standard Warranty: 1. Furnish glass manufacturer's standard limited 5 year warranty for sealed insulating glass panels. 2. Replace insulating glass units which become defective during the warranty period as indicated in manufacturer's warranty. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 PRIMARY GLASS A. Clear Float Glass: GLAZING 08800- 1/6 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-SHELL\08800.WPD COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 1036. 2. Casework Swinging Door Glass: Quality q4, 1/8 inch thick. 3. Relite Glass: Quality q3,clear, 1/4 inch thick. B. Tinted Float Glass: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 1036. 2. Window Glass: Quality q3,green tint, 1/4 inch thick. C. Mirror Glass: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 1036. 2. Unframed Mirror Glass: Quality q2,opaque alloy coating, 1/8 or 1/4 inch thick,square or beveled edges. 2.2 PROCESSED GLASS A. Tempered Glass: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 1048. 2. Door Lite Glass: Quality q3,clear, 1/4 inch thick,full tempered. 3. Relite Glass: Quality q3,clear, 1/4 inch thick,full tempered. 4. Window Glass: Quality q3,Green tint, 1/4 inch thick, full tempered. B. Heat Strengthened Glass: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 1048. 2. Window Glass: Quality q3,clear, 1/4 inch thick,heat strengthened. 3. Window Glass: Quality q3,green tinted, 1/4 inch thick,heat strengthened. C. Clear Welded Wire Glass: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 1036. 2. Fire Rated Door Lite Glass: Quality q3,25 gage wire, 1/8 inch glass each side of mesh,polished square mesh, 1/4 inch thick. 3. Fire Rated Relite Glass: Quality q3, 25 gage wire, 1/8 inch glass each side of mesh, polished square mesh, 1/4 inch thick. D. Laminated Glass: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 1036. 2. Skylight Glass: Quality q3, 3/16 inch thick,clear float glass each side of.030 polyvinyl butyl core, 7/16 or 15/32 inch thick. 3. Window Glass: Laminated glass. Quality q3 with two lites of 1/8 inch,clear float,two sheets.015 polyvinyl butyl,total thickness 1/4 inch thick. 2.3. INSULATING GLASS A. Glass Requirements: 1. Sealed Insulating Glass Standard: ASTM E 774,level C or higher. 2. Float Glass Standard: ASTM C 1036. GLAZING 08800-2/6 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-SHELL\08800.WPD • COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 3. Strengthened and Tempered Glass Standard: ASTM C 1048. 4. Glass Quality: q3. B. Insulated Window Glass,Low Emissivity Coated Tinted,Heat-Strengthened Float: 1. Total Thickness: 1 inch. 2. Outside Glass: 1/4 inch thick,green color. 3. Space: 1/2 inch thick. 4. Inside Glass: 1/4 inch thick,Clear. 5. Shading Coefficient: 0.66 maximum.(Alternate,South and West Elevation: Shading Coefficient: .25 to .27) 6. Visible Light Transmittance: 72 percent maximum.(Alternate,South and West Elevation:Visible Light Transmittace: 24 to 38 percent) 7. Acceptable Clear Glass Panels: Solarscreen 80 VE1-80 by Viracon,Sungate 100 Clear by PPG, Low-E Clear by Guardian,Sunglass HR Clear by Ford,LO-E Clear by Cardinal. 8. Final color as selectreed by A/E. C. Insulated Window Glass,Low E Coated Tempered: 1. Total Thickness: 1 inch. 2. Outside Glass: 1/4 inch thick,tempered,green color. 3. Space: 1/2 inch thick. 4. Inside Glass: 1/4 inch thick,Clear. 5. Shading Coefficient: 0.66 maximum. (Alternate, South, West, and East Elevation: Shading Coefficient: .25 to.27) 6. Visible Light Transmittance: 72 percent maximum.(Alternate, South,West,and East Elevation: Visible Light Transmittace: 24 to 38 percent) 7. Acceptable Clear Glass Panels: Solarscreen 80 VE1-80 by Viracon,Sungate 100 Clear by PPG, Low-E Clear by Guardian,Sunglass HR Clear by Ford,LO-E Clear by Cardinal. 8. Final color as selectreed by A/E. D. Insulated Window Glass,Low E Coated Laminated(Acoustical Glazing): 1. Total Thickness: 1 inch. 2. Outside Glass: 1/4 inch thick,green color. - 3. Space 1/2 inch thick. 4. Inside glass. 1/4 inch thick laminated. 5. Shading Coefficient: 0.66 maximum.(Alternate,East and South Elevation: Shading Coefficient: .25 to .27) 6. Visible Light Transmittance: 72% maximum. (Alternate, East Elevation: Visible Light Transmittace:24 to 38 percent) 7. Acceptable Clear Glass Panels: Solarscreen 80 VE1-80 by Viracon,Sungate 100 Clear by PPG, Low-E Clear by Guardian, Sunglass HR Clear by Ford,LO-E Clear by Cardinal. 8. Final color as selectreed by A/E. 2.4 GLAZING ACCESSORIES A. Glazing Sealant,GS-6: 1. Industry Standard: AAMA 808.3. 2. Components: One. 3. Composition: Acrylic Polymer. GLAZING 08800-3/6 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-SHELL\08800.WPD COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 4. Acceptable Acrylic Sealants: PTI 767 by Protective Treatments,Mono by Tremco. B. Elastomeric Sealant,ES-5: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 920,Type S,Class 25,Grade NS. 2. Components: One. 3. Grade: Non-sag. 4. Composition: Neutral cure or acetoxy cure silicone. 5. Shore A Hardness: 20 to 28. 6. Joint Movement Range: +/-25 to 50 percent. 7. Acceptable Neutral Cure Silicone Sealants: Chem-Calk 1000 and Chem-Calk N-Cure 2000 by Bostik,795 by Dow Corning,Silpruf and Silglaze N by General Electric,864 by Pecora,Rhodorsil 5C and Rhodorsil 6B by Rhone-Poulenc,Spectrem 2 by Tremco. 8. Acceptable Acetoxy Cure Silicone Sealants: Chem-Calk 1200 by Bostik,999-A by Dow Coming, Contractors 1000 by General Electric,863 by Pecora,Rhodorsil 3B by Rhone-Poulenc,Sonolastic Omniplus by Sonneborn,Proglaze by Tremco. C. Glazing Tape Sealant,GTS-1: 1. Industry Standard: AAMA 806.1. 2. Composition: Vulcanized butyl rubber. 3. Spacer Rod: Regular and preshimmed with spacer rod. 4. Shore A Hardness: 15 to 18. 5. Joint Movement Range: +/- 12.5 percent. 6. Acceptable Butyl Sealants: PTI 626 by Protective Treatments,SST-800 Tape by Tremco. D. Glazing Tape Sealant,GTS-2: 1. Industry Standard: AAMA 804.1. 2. Composition: Cross linked butyl polyisobutylene. 3. Spacer Rod: Regular and preshimmed with spacer rod. 4. Shore A Hardness: 15 to 18. 5. Joint Movement Range: +/- 12.5 percent. 6. Acceptable Butyl Polyisobutylene Sealants: P11 303 by Protective Treatments, 440 Tape and Preshimmed 440 Tape by Tremco. - E. Glazing Tape Sealant,GTS-3: 1. Industry Standard: AAMA 804.1 and 807.1. 2. Composition: Cross linked butyl polyisobutylene. 3. Spacer Rod: Regular and preshimmed with spacer rod. 4. Shore A Hardness: 10 to 15. 5. Joint Movement Range: +/-25 percent. 6. Acceptable Butyl Polyisobutylene Sealants: PTI 606 by Protective Treatments. F. Interior Glazing Tape Sealant for Steel Frames,GTS-4: 1. Composition: Medium Density PVC Foam. 2. Shore A Hardness: 25. 3. Adhesive: One side. 4. Acceptable Tape Sealants: V-780 by Norton Sealants. GLAZING 08800-4/6 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD'96044\B-SHELL\08800.WPD COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 G. Interior Glazing Tape Sealant for Aluminum Windows,GTS-5: 1. Composition: High Density PVC Foam. 2. Shore A Hardness: 43. 3. Adhesive: Two sides. 4. Acceptable Tape Sealants: V-980 by Norton Sealants. H. Glazing Extrusion Gaskets for Insulating Glass Windows,GEG-1: 1. Composition: Vulcanized polyolefinic thermoplastic rubber. 2. Shore A Hardness: 55 to 75. 3. Tensile Strength: 930 minimum. 4. Acceptable Gaskets: Santoprene Rubber by Monsanto. I. Glazing Extrusion Gaskets,GEG-2: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM D 1056 or ASTM C 509. 2. Composition: Closed cell neoprene sponge rubber, 50 durometer hardness. 3. Acceptable Gaskets: CCN-Sponge by Tremco. J. Glazing Extrusion Gaskets,GEG-3: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 864. 2. Composition: EPDM or neoprene rubber. 3. Acceptable Gaskets: Poly-Wej Gaskets and Dense Curtain Wall Gaskets by Tremco,Stan lock by Standard Products. K. Glazing Extrusion Gaskets,GEG-4: 1. Industry Standard: ASTM C 864. 2. Profile: Setting and edge block spacers. 3. Composition: EPDM,neoprene rubber,silicone compatible rubber,or silicone compound. 4. Setting Block Durometer Hardness: 85+/-5. 5. Acceptable Gaskets: Full Density by F.H.Maloney,Stanlock by Standard Products,Setting and Edge Blocks by Tremco. 2.5 FABRICATION A. Glass Cutting: 1. Cut glazing panels to size required for measured opening. 2. Provide adequate edge clearance and glazing panel bite at glazing channel. 3. Cut glass prior to tempering. 2.6 EXTRA STOCK A. Tinted Glass: 1. Furnish one extra panel of each 3 foot nominal wide tinted tempered glass. 2. Furnish one extra panel of each 6 foot nominal wide tinted tempered glass. PART 3 EXECUTION GLAZING 08800-5/6 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-SHELL\08800.WPD • COLONIAL PACIFIC LEASING Building Shell Permit • Project Number 296044 September 19, 1996 3.1 PERFORMANCE A. Installation of Glass: 1. Do not install sheets which have significant edge damage or other defects. 2. Install setting blocks at quarter points. 3. Install spacers and compression gaskets as recommended by glass manufacturer. 4. Install glazing tape or gaskets on frame and stops continuous at glass face. 5. Compress foam glazing tape or gaskets at least 25 percent of thickness with minimum fmished thickness of 3/32 inch. 6. Comply with requirements in Glazing Manual by Flat Glass Marketing Association. 3.2 COMPLETION A. Adjusting Defective Work: 1. Replace broken or damaged glazing panels prior to Substantial Completion. 2. Replace scratched polycarbonate sheet prior to Substantial Completion. B. Final Cleaning: 1. Wash glass and wipe dry prior to Substantial Completion. 2. Wash polycarbonate sheet panels and wipe dry prior to Substantial Completion. 3. Comply with requirements in Section 01700,Contract Closeout. 3.3 GLAZING SCHEDULE A. Exterior Glazing: 1. Fixed Windows: Insulating tinted float and tinted tempered glass. 2. Fixed Windows: 1 inch thick,insulating clear float and clear tempered glass. 3. Fixed Windows: Insulating clear low emissivity float and clear low emissivity tempered glass. 4. Aluminum Framed Glass Entrance Doors: 1/4 inch thick,clear tempered glass. B. Interior Glazing: - 1. Fire Rated Doors and Relites: 1/4 inch thick,clear square mesh polished wired glass. 2. Non-fire Rated Doors and Relites,Exposed to Impact: 1/4 inch thick,clear tempered or laminated glass. ._ 3. Non-Fire Rated Doors and Relites,Protected from Impact: 1/4 inch thick,clear float glass. 4. Swinging Cabinet Doors: 1/8 inch thick,clear float glass. 5. Unframed Mirrors: 1/4 inch thick,opaque mirror glass. "END OF SECTION" GLAZING 08800-6/6 F:\WPDATA\SPECS\MASTER.SPD\96044\B-SHELL\08800.WPD 11/05/96 13:42 0503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Cm001/002 p *R*I *D*E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 (503)625-6177 TELEPHONE: (503) 625-6177 FAX # (503) 625-6179 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: l - 5 ( � TO; C 241 7•2 C 1 G,.�-a n D Krr w�d_t► TELEPHONE: FAX NUMBER: �► �J�'__�?_�? ATTENTION: FROM: ARE SENDING 2- PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) . IF Y 1 DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL US AS SOON A POSSIBLE. THANK YOU! ,;(3 rnrvr1ad nnnar 11/05/96 13:43 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL 21002/002 Sent by: GROUP MACKENZIE 5032261285; 11 /05 2:15PM;Jetfax #721 ;Page 2/2 . ill . ..0 lid :. _ _ .1 -, 11 . _ ITLI, I: FREMMi=ik 4 I e_ 1 7=-1 _ .., a 1 1 F S l V + i 1 l/Y1 ¢Z+ LI art- 0l'SP0s J Co - .16c:7rn.e414-• :t.‘ wf h S ,; Co 1.1 5 4-‘, 4..t€Z _` f tq 6L,,„ lc ((... ,* -1-7-ft ri :\:;27, 1 C.--... (-- \.... \- --: :_ .. ... ... , 1, • . Lcr . . . . i X15 t 1 9(.0 . 1-. 11 /05 15:19 1996 FROM: 503 625 6179 TO: 2473 PAGE: 2 11/05-'96 13:44 ' '50" '?5 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Z002/002 ;ent by:'GROUP MACKENZIE 5032281285; 11105/ 2:15PM;jetfax #72-I ;Page z/e 1-11.e:11511.- u 11 II 1 1 ila n ft Kilf 4 III .I II ii. I= L A 4,....____ . _________ Fr.,. ‘ll ., .,. I , , --rhs .s ,,k,.. il vvi -i-1.,,,L, ,,—,—,-----. . .\,..:11 . 0,,postij Q0 , kfie:p ro.k..,-4. /4—ISA-Tc(4 WI It-. I.r*.f;are- - Y\4-46 ii`C 00 fri ,.. :.1--ct trif -W--it .-- a r _s SCI 0�;h - Ica-ry e. _______,____(_it...-e,-,A in,,7 _ ma . L,t • • . i l 151 1 11 q(C) ..-. 1. ,1. - G R O U P - MACKENZIE November 7, 1996 RECEIVED NOV U + 1996 City of Tigard CUMMUNIIY DEVELOPMENT, Planning Department Attention: Mr. Will De Andrea 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Farmers Insurance Conditions of Approval C..4• N SDR-96-0019 ▪ • Project Number 296044 o x 0 -ci E ° Dear Will: o. E r1 Attached are our revised plans and supportive information necessary to comply with the conditions of approval for the above mentioned project. The following addresses the status of ° the actions taken to comply with each of the Conditions(1-16). a � v z • 2 1. Application for a street opening permit was made October 24, 1996. Five sets of N drawings were submitted to the City of Tigard Engineering Department in support of this application. Comments from the city were received 11/4/96. Revisions based on those comments are being returned to the City Engineering Department today(11/7/96). O F 2. The name, address,and telephone number of the entity responsible for executing agreements and providing financial assurance was provided with the above-mentioned Group submittal. This entity is Gerding/Edlen Development 2525 SW First Avenue, Suite 201, Mackenzie, Portland, OR 97210 (503) 299-6000. Incorporated Archite"-,:_ 3. Bonding forms are being prepared by the city,based on the c st$ timate which was Interior Design provided to the City Engineering Department(10/24/96). Williams of R&H Land Use Planning Construction(general contractor for the project)indicated that he talked to Brian Rager Group as to when the bonding forms need to be submitted. Brian indicated that this will be Mackenzie done when permit reviews are completed and a permit is ready to be issued. A check Engineering, Incorporated with the forms will be submitted at site permit issuance. It is our understanding the civivstructural Developer-Engineer Agreement will not be required. Signage and streetlight permits Engineering and fees are not applicable. Transportation Planning 4. The pedestrian/bicycle path easement form and legal description are being prepared and The tradition of will be submitted to the City Engineering Department early next week(11/11/96). Mackenzie Engineering and Mackenzie/Saito continuez. F:\W PDATA\96-11\96044\07L 1.KS Farmers Insurance- Conditions of Approval Project Number 296044 November 7, 1996 Page 2 5. The non-remonstrative agreement form is being prepared and will be scheduled to be submitted to the city with the above mentioned easement documents early next week (11/11/96). 6. The joint use and maintenance agreements have been documented as part of the Declaration of Easements. This document will be submitted to the City Engineering Dept. today. (11/7/96). 7. Plans were delivered to Mr. Stu Davis at Tualatin Valley Water District on October 25, 1996, for his review and approval. Mr.Davis returned to us a red line mark up set (10/31/96). We have made the required corrections and have resubmitted the drawings on 11/3/96. Projected time line for approval from original submittal date is±10 days. This approval is needed for the City Engineer to complete his review of conditions 1-3 above. 8. All private utility easements have been documented in tl;Declaration of Easements. Exhibits are currently being prepared to accompany this Agreement. Again,this will be submitted with the above mentioned documents,4, 5, and 6. 9. All portions of the private storm pipe within the public right-of-way of SW 68th Avenue will be constructed to public standards. Permit application to ODOT for storm drainage connection within these rights-of-way has been made(10/30/96)with a check for the fee submitted 11/1/96. 10. Final plans and calculations and maintenance plan for the on-site water quality facility have been submitted to the City of Tigard Engineering Department(10/27/96). Brian Rager indicated via telephone 11/1/96 that he had approved and signed off on this item. 11. An updated Erosion Control plan has been provided to the City of Tigard Engineering Department(10/24/96). Brian Rager indicated via telephone 11/1/96 that he had approved and signed off on this item. 12. 1200-C General Permit application was submitted to the City of Tigard(with the above drawings)on(10/24/96). Brian Rager indicated via telephone 11/1/96 that he had approved and signed off on this item. 13. We have reviewed our plans with Gene Birchill of Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue (10/30/96). He expressed approval and is prepared to sign off on the plans when he receives his copy from the City. F:\WPDATA\96-11\96044\07L l.KS Farmers Insurance- Conditions of Approval Project Number 296044 November 7, 1996 Page 3 14. Revised plans are enclosed,which indicate calculations and locations for items outlined in Condition 13,a,b,c, d,and e. Attached is a letter from Pride Disposal which indicates approval of the solid waste facility location and equipment. A tree mitigation plan,produced by Walker&Macy is also included in this submittal. As indicated on the plans, we are required to mitigate for 1794 caliper inches for the entire site,or 1084 caliper inches for the north side and 710 caliper inches for the south side. Trees planted on the north side of the site, as required mitigation,result in a total of 116 caliper inches. In lieu of tree replacement on site, the remaining caliper inches will be mitigated through monetary compensation to the City of Tigard. Based on the above number,an additional 968 caliper inches, or 323 three inch caliper trees are required to mitigate the north side of the site. For estimating purposes, we have used the sum of$166.00 per 3" caliper tree. At this rate, $53,618.00 is the monetary mitigation requirement for the north side of this site. However,trees being planted to fulfill landscape code requirements will all be 3" caliper trees. Because the code requires these to be a minimum of 2" caliper trees,a credit of 1" per tree will be counted towards the mitigation requirement, for a total of a 61 caliper inch credit for the north side of the site, or 61 one inch caliper trees. For estimating purposes we have used the sum of$66.00 per 1"inch caliper tree. This results in a$4,026.00 credit on the north side, for a total of site mitigation cost of$49,592.00. A similar calculation reveals that the south side will require mitigation for 710 caliper inches. A total of 120 caliper inches are being mitigated on site. Therefore, 590 caliper inches or 197 three inch caliper trees must be mitigated in the form of monetary compensation to the City of Tigard.Using the sum of$166.00 per 3"inch caliper tree this equals $32,702.00. Again, to calculate the credit for over sized trees, 58 trees,or 58 extra caliper inches are provided on the south side. At the cost of$66.00 per 1" inch caliper tree, the resulting credit would be $3,828.00 for a total of$28,874.00 for off site monetary mitigation on the south side. The grand total, (phase one/north side and two/south side), is $78,466.00. A check for$49,529.00(phase one,north side mitigation)will be provided to the City of Tigard prior to Building Permit issuance. 15. A letter will be prepared by Mr. Bill Owen(Arborist),as soon as all the tree protection measures are in place. 16. Documentation of the resolution of this right-of-way issue will be provided with building permit application for the south side. Gerding/Edlen Development Company is pursuing this issue. F:\WPI>ATA\96-I 1\96044\07L1.KS Farmers Insurance- Conditions of Approval Project Number 296044 November 7, 1996 Page 4 Application has been made for building permit for a single building on the north side of SW 68th Avenue. Issuance of a site development permit is anticipated on November 14, 1996. We realize that, in order for this to happen, the Conditions of Approval must be adequately addressed. We believe the actions and documentation as outlined above illustrate our compliance and intent to comply with all the Conditions of Approval. Please feel free to contact me with any concerns or questions you may have. Sincerely, a ' Fukuyama BEZ:TF/ks c: Peter Alto, Dave Larson,Beth Zauner,Jeff Hunter,Group Mackenzie Mark Edlen,Kelly Saito, Gerding/Edlen Development Mr. Funk/Ms. Aldritch- City of Tigard,Building Department Mr.Brian Rager/Mr. John Hagman-City of Tigard,Engineering Department F:\W PDATA\96-1 I\96044\07L I.KS WILLIAM L. OV. _,N & ASSOCIATES TREE AND LANDSCAPE CONSULTING SERVICES P.O. Box 641, Portland, Oregon 97207 g� (503)222-7007/ - (�+� ► F Jt iv' FAX(503) 656-3219 TRANSMITTAL/FIELD MEMO TO: 11, I L1— VA-tub (La it- CA- c G - A21440J k91 P3Cp 1)H 13 i +1 '- 1?L Y(GJ&I ) � From: U.,9 L- (2 Date: II I I -)q kj 11�� c 11 Project#: /' R. y Our job#: VO c'3 G Ro u " tt 4.C.1�1�2 0•Y_—l I� Subject: G( rat-- e0 ErLv LEL- My1ELA-, V im r _5 it et-1 I s r , V I 1-1P( i k I r Lt9 9 ? Rr-1& (.0 V (-1111I-er4 1'Lt9s ?(�icAl c1 A9 y 1.6014 � � u ILDI tJ� * 2— K3 i1 Ls, el 1E- m` v 1 LP L 6 47 -4-1? 11:k a440-s& L-a7— 3, Ca ‘..› rpt..►.cam '- VA) p 1-L - ZID o c Lk ?litter CAL-1--- ht tUl-c `-c if*.tt 4 it c.9 -r-V-k---eier ‘,< Nbs) Copy to: I I' u ,r Z{a- 1' e ,y A� w CITY OF 1IGARD — RECEIPT OF PAYMENT RECEIPT NO. :96-286709 • CHECK AMOUNT : 49529. 00 NAME : GI=RDING/EDLEN DEV CO ' CASH AMOUNT 0. 00 ADDRESS : 4650 SW MACADAM AVE #220 PAYMEN1 DATE : 11'/19/96 SUBDIVISION 1 PORTLAND, OR 97201- PURPOSE OF PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID PURPOSE OF PAYMEN1 AMOUN1 PAID TREE REPLACEMENT REVENUE 49529. 00 / ' L--- ( ii .s_____../..(// TREE REPLENISHMENT FUND FOR COLONIAL PACIFIC— FARMERS INS. PROJECT SDR9G-0019 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID — — — —) 49529.. 00 _ ..<.^�:.t .:{.�_�. .. .:J... u.Ar',G•id`11 a..'t1��lgi oaf'•'.. .��A�r..f,':`. .. ,• • .. x. .a ✓. an t' • a., t. • • • -4i;:,..10": «fir ' 1rF -' ' i r`2 '• •. • : ' ' ! 4k i • -'`' .; 14. :Pi I,...1-..^.' KEY BANK.OF E r • 1s. .• '=rr Y � �^'.'n. "GERD1NG/EDLEN DEVELOPMENT CO. ' . "»;''' o rte y v t x' ' ' ': � " • 4 :1-•-:-... -• 3 "�" ` t' r.c . 4650 S.W.MACADAM AVE AYE.,SUITE 220 _ R ` y r . , c . ' �"• ' .. .'`+ ' ORTLAND,OR 97201 -' 4 41 o,�f c s . t;',-" .. Q,PH 503)299.6000 K , ': i t .y t x 0 1 l r tom x• fi i ._ .R ` . , - -Prt 1A .. ' - �Y- *Ir . 't M.4',,, a , Y • • - .y • ,',15 a s cA +, #- f .••a. • f,,,.,..• tom, ,ti 1 7t _ _,t •-, • „•. ;f - 'r ~ a ' F PAY ' ; orty-Nine Thouand.f . F •- t o o # y s - t 'd T .q ti '> ` ` =C. i.-,..7' � or � X+ w�% 14 yM � - + . .; i.t, -p�:'s� "Rs: k r t. f- ."r� i' � \.r7 }. tr ,v� i Q , , , Y ; ,.' bt y , ,. :- ' *-- . -....,*•-• V' ) -,# ' T -1.-, u �5._ -. :t*'."y r ``` . a' 4 - 1 H , e . J ' ` s _ _. w• .s ..• - �`, tom'• • /s � b,.� e� ta r. -+A i.. 4} s . . e 1.1r • � :,.�, �4 a'•�a�.^'�,�Y�. •,r i4,. t: �n �.r,•tit m j`e tt e r t+ + :';::,....,•',',' 4• , f � , : ,, { , { ` K ,' , f ;w� , t•'ht{2,^7.1•r " i'7� 4. li1^tI • '• ;" '4i.r• ��L f",..-::'.:‘,--';',..=:,...:!-: '�-. ;.•! _5',t+j,1; . I ». .;ia" +.'M—,! �Sr:, , i .:•..,r x•„• •. rj yi':?5,+,=.ds. ..';`,.4<" ,' r{ r ` `. y '^'' v. L•�t �'f 4A a"84.;M 1' Tlj'•,�'r`yt �v :l 6 .jC. y Ir 4�, ', . t•,• s :.T t Y.,...211',1%,:-..,..,'',4,;j'.1.:.";;11.;C r + r t+, r,ai t, r!+? it !f, ! 4 4w `t -':) . ',', ' a i.,::;,,,)..,, �� : , a,s x 9 i 11 rd■ �' rr.',gY .\l% `� il,5 .{,A i `f �'1 r .. , •:•` °' >. vy' F r y 4,1�',� a rt 4 �ts y � �� r t .4 p `1 'f a .\.tr 5 r r i . t.., , ., ' ! 3 r r �r �'r i •r�, { �I S :��id �'i� t �: rl-j f r t'y!rl,�%'', ' '.,a t ,fh l't, i'r fit•,j O. 4: M ','• r > d' • y ,r' , •• 't ,.! w '1',. , 'l .4','. ,4tr C '•i r,tl.Af r5 i 'S,1.r ", \r H ,, 1 •,,, a«.r r• t t� '.1.... r• t'fStit i,. 4'ti'i h,,, "t ..'f,..',.,'"; , ,, , t by 't . r a ' .r )! , -"rrr ,(/%,,,,,..,p,'.4 i /. :'eS �• E,••rt 141 a.• 1 t ■, !',,,i, r, -`r ;a >,■ J,rr,' tC �, r ' I .. t } 4,a y:t ri . .. ' t t •i` •",'il ,r ,,."ry ••',, ;. ,,«f•.; frp ,' ) i _f.,, S� ' -.Lr', .7i s..• 4ri . '„^" of ''t •'. s. ,,... f Farmers Insurance- Conditions of Approval Project Number 296044 November 7, 1996 Page 3 14. Revised plans are enclosed, which indicate calculations and locations for items outlined in Condition 13,a, b,c, d, and e. Attached is a letter from Pride Disposal which indicates approval of the solid waste facility location and equipment. A tree mitigation plan,produced by Walker& Macy is also included in this submittal. As indicated on the plans, we are required to mitigate for 1794 caliper inches for the entire site,or 1084 caliper inches for the north side and 710 caliper inches for the south side. Trees planted on the north side of the sites required mitigation,sresult in a total of 116 caliper inches. In lieu of tree replacement on site,the remaining caliper inches S1 pE will be mitigated through monetary compensation to the City of Tigard. Based on the 5 Lir !� above number, an additional 968 caliper inches, or 323 three inch caliper trees are r0 required to mitigate the north side of the site. For estimating purposes,we have used Ha the sum of$166.00 per 3" caliper tree. At this rate, $53,618.00 is the monetary mitigation requirement for the north side of this site. However,trees being planted to 6 1� fulfill landscape code requirements will all be 3" caliper trees. Because the code 1 requires these to be a minimum of 2" caliper trees, a credit of 1" per tree will be counted 1,,t towards the mitigation requirement, for a total of a 61 caliper inch credit for the north (�1 side of the site,or 61 one inch caliper trees. For estimating purposes we have used the sum of$66.00 per 1"inch caliper tree. This results in a$4,026.00 credit on the north side, for a total of site mitigation cost of$49,592.00. A similar calculation reveals that the south side will require mitigation for 710 caliper inches. A total of 120 caliper inches are being mitigated on site. Therefore, 590 caliper inches or 197 three inch caliper trees must be mitigated in the form of monetary compensation to the City of Tigard.Using the sum of$166.00 per 3"inch caliper tree this equals$32,702.00. Again, to calculate the credit for over sized trees,58 trees,or 58 extra caliper inches are provided on the south side. At the cost of$66.00 per 1" inch caliper tree, the resulting credit would be $3,828.00 for a total of$28,874.00 for off site monetary mitigation on the south side. The grand total, (phase one/north side and two/south side), is $78,466.00. A check for$49,529.00 (phase one,north side mitigation)will be provided to the City of Tigard prior to Building Permit issuance. 15. A letter will be prepared by `•ir. Bill Owen (Arborist),as soon as all the tree protection measures are in place. 16. Documentation of the resolution of this right-of-way issue will be provided with building permit application for the south side. Gerding/Edlen Development Company is pursuing this issue. F:\WPI)ATA\96-11\96044\07L.1.KS CONJDrroms 13. `T.V.F 4 R. SILrNINZI- ?A NS. &PEKE -rot ME 71-10-&S ffliz . # 144 F3. DoWE �.. IOsplu .S -pRc ttcEdb FoR Cotor);AL � �i Reo b Fob. -Kcir 6.. IR r'�CC„'.D S000r H FAc.. t. e. �oNE F. •ktto1Ee st4 $o2ni -Pxfrisej soorN 7/mse_ sfl// /V56)/b, MniCtFcZic *J CicfECx, NoieT.if si . (17/4 I Se.v7Az Z7 ,e e0 7c Si7'- pee Ail 7, 45. 75J/owe/A) 59ttlT I _ _ , • .7, • • t. 7, r. '"7...-r" • . •• ,a hi 1 4-'1 ji1r j4 - • _301 d. 4 j1 , ..14%7 Lfejat 7;1 1r7a,ri ;g:1.14Ar`fr.'` ..1‘ •BniCrt wr":02 3t ( )1' A c.' •- I -41 !Ye: . ..1 . • • ,.." ??, _ .5 • .99 N.OFI K./5c Ho//.5 e" seate 31' c s ryc 1 7- HcA ji. A(76 /<,a/va.-1L/f -3 oN11/"11( 716t. z,"6„1//po\re,s(e. eA,Atitft, 11 /19 13:58 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 50322812P" PAGE- 11/19/96 1 . 11/19/98 TIDE 13:55 FAX 1 5 .28 7821 TICOR TITLE aI001 COMMERCIAL TITLE DIVISION T1COR TITLE INSURANCE "At TICOR we measure our effectiveness in terms FAX TRANSMITTAL of our customers'success" DATE SENT Telephone (5Q3) 224-0550, FAX (503) 242-1964 COMPANY NAmf GROUP W — PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET WN = Rifortiari- TAM:Do FAX NO. • 228-1285 . . _ . FROM Carol Ray (503) 727-0280 MESSAGE: Our #W64139.3 Copies of deeds recorded Noventer 14, 1996. RFPc11/ D (V\ ; t0\1 IY1 L ' 1-• "'I, ' PA-CAI-1( At lit 11. _ • I. .\J lui ugh IrMs 15r, — 311, eu■lo 477 d 4.— ' • '1c2 --- QuadCounty Title Plant Ttiiiiitnnmsh emir& Clackamas County Washington County Columbia County 11 /19 13:58 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 50322812Rg PAGE: 2 11/r9/96 'TUE 13:56 FAX 1 I 228 7821 TICOR TITLE — 002 • STATE OF OREGON SS • County of WashIngtorik44,, JerrY An. Iblif0 of Assam- ment and_ non And. • • County—,- _ • • _._ __ . _ _ Clerk for, ti'd• rtifYrA! the with di . ' °Neu and . - 4 said ;• • - 1)" * ' \ :1-;• r, _ • •Am • • .:014 e . •Ireotor of • saintant • Uon, e010010001 led( • Doc : 96102256 Rect: 175478 1293.00 • 11/14/1996 03:44:01pm 1. • • • • • • • • 1.i"•;.. • ••• •fi • ' : •. • " • • A-444 ::O.LtigH.: 44144, 4' 11 /19 13:59 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 PAGE: 3 11/19/96 TUE 13:56 FAX 1 r 228 7821 TICOR TITLE — Ul003 II return-t0 — - �1ntll a change-6- d�`Q temen2s After Recording shall be sent to the following ad of") g/Ecllen Development Company Terry G. Hauck Ge50 Macadam Ave., tu'te 220 rT�' 4650 SW M 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Suite 1700 Pacwest Center u. Portland, OR 97204 3 2 STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED IAA P F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to Gerding aInvestment Company, an Oregon corporation,as to an undivided fifty percent(50%)interest and Northwest Real Estate Advisors, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percent F: (50%) interest, all as Tenants-in-Common, Grantee, the following described real property: in The real property described in Exhibit AN attached hereto. •I The true consideration for this conveyance is $1,239,746.70. This deed gives effect to a lot line adjustments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon, case file numbers MIS 96-0011, MIS 96-0019 and MIS 96-0025. CC THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY W RB IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE P O PLANNING DECRY, SHOULD T V VERIFY APPROVED APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ORS 0.930.ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR • FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN Executed this II.thday of November, 1996. F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation ..4.“'tlirr WASHINGTON COUNTY - .e w•_ - 'ice-%reside. REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER /X s _ s "— >� By:$4?�D.OD • / • i '- - / ANY I: � f PAID DATE Its: d.ce—Ikeesident (Notaries contained on following page) PARCEL 4 1 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (17ri2298 02 w.,.;9. . ..t4 _it . • , . • 11 /19 13:59 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 PAGE: 4 11/19/96 TLE 13:57 F1X 1 5 '.28 7821 TICOR TITLE X004 — STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss• County of Los An eles ) Lumibao personally On November 11 1996 before meand , authorized • aPPearedrepresenttives of F.I.G. Holding CampanY, a California corporation, personally known to s whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged cknowled es ca me to be the person ties, and that by to the that they executed the persons, orethe entry upon behalf owhich the persons acted, executed • on the rostrum pe the instrument. • r� �•,� GRACE D.I.UWtMIA0 CoMerVion#117/750 _ + Y Mot3Y p —c•CfiXici •y •a rt Los A'arTs ..o,<. My Comm.ExPoesNov 12. 997 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA My Commission Expires: _November 12, 1999 _ • • • 7. • • • • • 2 — STATUTORY B2RGAIN AND SALE DEED 071322911n02141=V131501.1) V13►sa.t) 11 /19 14:00 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 PAGE: 5 11/19/96 TUE 13:57 FAX 1 ! 228 7821 TICOR TITLE — Ill 005 Parcel 4 Legal Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Townsl'ip 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian,City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point in the west line of that tract relinquished is ed to the ou City of Tigard ga ny Resolution No. 600, recorded in the Minutes and R o Commission, April 20, 1981, said point also being on the northerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract,North 01°11'39" East,279.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning; • thence leaving said west line North 88°46'21" West 133.19 feet; thence South 01°19'35" West 50.73 feet; thence North 89°04'02" West 39.08 feet; thence South 01°35'20" West 60.23 feet; thence North 87°19'47"West 127.11 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 161.00 feet, a central 1 ngetof 32°26'44", a long chord of North 71°06'25" West, 89.96 feet, an arc length South 31°46'49" West,60.69 feet; thence North 56°26'33"West, 18.32 feet; thence South 30°38'50"West,28.54 feet; thence South 55°43'57" East, 8.02 feet; thence.South 30°38'50"West, 19.22 feet; • EXHT$IT "A" Page 1 of 2 • 11119 14:00 1996 FROM: i 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 11/19/96 SUE 13:58 FAX 1 5 '28 7821 PAGE: 6 TICOR TITLE X10 0 6 R • thence South 46°48'37"West,49.79 feet to the northeasterly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along said right-of-way along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 119.93 feet, a central angle of 45°46'08", a long chord of North 20°15'15"West,93.28 feet, an arc length of 95.80 feet; • thence continuing along said right-of-way North 02°37'47"East, 332.45 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Irving Street(vacated); thence along said right-of-way of S.W.Irving Street South 88°36'39"East 510.06 feet to the aforementioned west line of th.City of Tigard tract; thence along said west line South 01°11'39"West 213.76 feet to the True Point of beginning; Containing 3.55 acres or 154,616 square feet. • • • • y.' EXHIBIT "A" 4■•• ;• Page 2 of :2 ;: 11 /19 14:01 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 PAGE: 7 11/19/96 TUE 13:58 FAX 1 '° ?28 7821 TICOR TITLE — 0 007 r K �: � d• STATE OF OREGON 1 SS County of Washington I, Jerry: -gnAQJM of Aesese-•. __ _. – ... _ ment en• •n • ► 0 County Clerk for, • .•' � s••ti� :rtlfy that the wit leer .4gk1%4 - iVed end re••rtt d.n„R�• • : '���' Oki of eeid tour, * '=� ;! y 0:2110.(40:3 ••Irector of e eaiki fixation,Ex- v • ` lark Doc : 96102255 Rect: 175478 773. 00 11/14/1996 03 : 44: 01pm • • • J.• 'iF.• ..i �” ; . •!. _.s • '7t" •j'•pr:• 11 /19 14:01 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 5032281285 PAGE: 8 11/1'9/96 1UE 1x:58 FAX 1 228 7821 TICOR TITLE _ 11008 . — � 7954 . 1 :: : Until a change Is requested all tax statements After Recording return to: .. .• •- .' : `shall be sent to the following address:•M ' M Terry C. Hauck Gerding/Fdlen Develop-41:A Company • 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue 4650 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 220 ' '" Suite 1700 Pacwest Center Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 2 .; STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED CC F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to Gerding Co Investment Company, an Oregon corporation,as to an undivided fifty percent(50%) interest and c Northwest Real Estate Advisors, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest, all as Tenants-in-Common, Graltee, the following described real property: III Y .t-•.; The real property described in Exhibit "A•' attached hereto. C) The true consideration for this conveyance is 5719,940.22. This deed gives effect to lot 4i ;;ne adir..:Lments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon, case file numbers MIS 96-0011, MIS 96- • OO1c. a;,o4 MIS 96-0025. NIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN TEIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGU'..A.TTONS• BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Executed this t i thday of November, 1996. F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation *TN, WA5111NG70M COUNTY _ '- -);,.- ' y7,� REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX $y'� - _ ' --7"- Ks $OOi /i-/4 9 �I u - -. fit FEE PAID DATE / "� / By: Its: vice .resident itiota:ics contained on following page) PARCEL 3 �4>e►rCwi316t5.1) , 1 — BARGAIN AND SALE DEED : .•_ • .o7rJ 1a ; STATUTORY ..,�:: _ �"•' �'��'�i Y..i� -�•. 11 /19 14:02 1996 FROM 1 503 228 7821 TO: 503228128E PAGE: 9 11/19/96 IIE 19:59 FAX 1 51 28 7821 TICOR TITLE 2009 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) - ) ss. County of Low Angeles ) On November 11. 1996 before me, Grace D. Lumibao personally appeared Gerald lek tesxlo G. Heredy , authorized 8 Company, personally known to representatives of P.I.O. Holdin Com a California corporation, me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. Yti Gommis9on+f Pte! . PC,A.Azyvv Notary �CouMC tug Mod My G gym•Expire,Nov 17.1994 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA My Commission Expires: November 12, 1999 • • • • • • • • • 2 — 'STATU'TORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 3 (13/32298/117214errctU131,31.1) 11 /19 14:02 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 50322812"' 11/19/96 TUE 13:59 FAX 1 228 7821 PAGE: 10 TICOR TITLE ———. — - -- — — al 010 • % ;-, is • • • •.,+{ . 's..'. r .• • .jl • ' r N t Parcel 3 I; Legal Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600, recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission,April 20, 1981, said point a'so being on the northerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the northerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway North 87°28'24"West,278.72 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 388.26 feet, a central angle of 27°22'26", a long chord of North 73°47'09" West, 183.74 feet, an are length of 185.50 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way, along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 119.93 feet, a central angle of 16°57'37", a long chord of North 51°37'07" West, 35.37 feet, an arc length of 35.50 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way North 46°48'37"East 49.79 feet; thence North 30°38'50"East, 19.22 feet; thence North 55°43'57"West,8.02 feet; thence North 30°38'50"East, 28.54 feet; thence South 56°26'33" East, 18.32 feet; thence North 31°45'49"East,60.69 feet; thence along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 161.00 feet,a central angle of 32°26'44", a long chord of South 71'06'25"East, 89.96 feet, an arc length of 91.17 feet; • • , EXHIBIT "A" • Pang 1 of 2 11 /19 14:02 1996 FROM: 503 228 7821 TO: 50322812f 11/19/96 TU E 14:00 FAX 1 50, _28 7821 TICOR PAGE: 11 TITLE - lib 011 . • `.9 . 4- • , thence South 8799'47-East, 127.11 feet; thence North 01°35'20"East, 60.23 feet; thence South 89°04'02"East,39.08 feet; thence North 01°19'35"East, 50.73 feet thence South 88°46'21"East, 133.19 feet to the west line of the aforementioned City of Tigard tract; thence along said west line South 01°11'39"West,279.14 feet to the Point of Ileginning. • Containing 2.06 acres or 89,791 square feet. •- • - • • .. • .• . • • • • • ••• ; • . • • 4.: •L:.. ,• . ' • , 11 /19 14:03 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 50322812Ac PAGE: 12 11/19/96 TUE 14:00 FAX 1 228 7821 TICOR TITLE _ la 012 STATE Of: 'OREGON it County of Washington I I,Jerry ; y f x,1.,}4, of A B:fr — _ kip lu - the wit ••r;:• 'A M .t said • 17, Nt.11%, ,c7 ..j • • •Irettor of . : . , -tion,Ex- • ,;•'" . . i' lurk • • Rect Doc :: 961028254 1'75478 795.00 11/14/1996 03:44101pm • • • • • err "..:r .'t:' r::: rid_:. t� 11 /19 14:03 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 50322812p� PAGE: 13 11/19/96 TUE 14:01 FAX 1 1 228 7821 TICOR TITLE_ Zion r t t . „is , . 1:4;', i. . —: . . t+ R - a After Recording return to: Until a change is requested all tax statements w, . .. shall be sent to the following address: - i Gerding/Edlen Development Company Terry C. rya uck P I 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue 4650 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 220 Suite 1700 Pacwest Center Portland, OR 97201 3 Portland, OR 97204 STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED cc F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to Gerding 0 Investment Company, an Oregon corporation,as to an undivided fifty percent(50%)interest and F Northwest Real Estate Advisors, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest, all as Tenants-in-Co'lmon, Grantee, the following described real property: CD 1, The real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The true consideration for this conveyance is$741,658.58. This deed gives effect to lot line adjustments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon, case file numbers MIS 96-0011, MIS 96- 0019 and MIS 96-0025. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Executed this lltrday of November, 1996. F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation „-----7 �*. 14 WASHINGTON COUNTY / J - s: REAL`,PROPERTY TRANSFCR TAX *Y: - t. �` FEE PAID DATE - By: Its: Vie4:Pfesident (Notaries containcd on following page) PARCEL 2 1 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 07l3229Br102146/rCW131685.1) 11 /19 14:04 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 50322812Rz PAGE: 14 11/19/96 TUE 14:01 FAg 1 228 7821 TICOR TITLE X014 - -STATE OF CAITFOlkNL ) ss. : . • County of_ysu_tinaeles ) personally On November 11 1996 before me, Grace D. Lumibao pe y appeared Gerald A. Dulek and Laszlo G. Hereby , authorized representatives Company, a California corporation, personally known to represcntahves of F.Y.D. Holding panY� me to be the pis whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged es to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by signatures the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. LitA.,„„,/kz. GRACE 0 WOO ±11 Co„YtWo"+1m7566 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA 12 1999 raron► —CO1°'"r° My Commission Expires: November , My Comm Expire*Nov Carty.1999 • g7/32^i46+102118f1'CEU131506.1) 2 STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED ,5 • � , .. � .... 4`+s• .. '°:::..Fi�.�:•�'+.'L: 1';':1•: ',a...�'. .T, .•f�/i�.. 11/19 14:04 1996 FROM: 11/19%96 1 503 228 7821 TUE 14:02 FAX 1 5L TO: 503228128 28 7821 TICOR TITLE PAGE 15 • 015 • i•. .. • • Parcel 2 Legal Description A tract of law situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600,recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation 1 Commission, April 20, 1981, said point also being on the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract, South 01°11'39"West,4.10 feet; thence continuing along said west line South 15°40'08"West, 76.53 feet; thence South 77°12'09"West, 95.77 feet; thence South 01°16'19" West, 25.00 feet to the centerline of Varns Street(vacated); thence South 88°43'41" East, 115.29 feet; thence South 07°54'41" West, 228.94 feet; thence North 89°58'00"West, 116-93 feet; thence North 01°23'21"East, 80.64 feet; thence North 17°58'28"West 79.72 feet; thence North 01°22'45"East, 17.13 feet; thence North 88°36'39" West, 101.22 feet thence North 01°23'21"East, 59.00 feet; thence North 88°36'39" West, 130.03 feet; EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 . • •• 1 j n• 11119 14:05 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 50322812A� PAGE: 16 11/I9/96 TUE 14:02 FAX 1 ! 228 7821 TICOR TITLE Z018 a thence North 01°26'21"East, 60.00 feet; thence North 88°36'39"West,78.86 feet; thence North 68°20'15"West, 12.00 feet; thence North 21°39'45"East, 105.41 feet to the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway;with a central n-tangent curve to the thence along said right-of--way along the arc of a no 04'ftEast, 174 OS feet, angle of 19°24'40",a radius of 516.22 feet,a long of South 77°46 an arc length of 174.89 feet; ontinuin along said right-of-way South 87°28'24"East,279.60 feet to the Point of thence c g Beginning. • Containing 2.12 acres or 92,499 square feet. EXHIE•IT "A" Page 2 of 2 • • • • • • .. • • tv 11 /19 14:05 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 50322812P PAGE: 17 11/Y9/96 TUE 14:02 FAX 1 : 228 7821 TICOR TITLE Z017 + ' •.'.� STATE OF OREGON • ,;. County of Washington SS 1,J e r r y : ' -rico 'Q •• of Assam__ • _ - - --,—iyrent–o. :ti: --•,•Tv io County , ::` Clerk fo -S ••. '' rtify that the wi ••1•,: its "�- - ` and .rgb• TN/4n,', •- of said coun * �i� , `I•* a�„ . - ' • f•!rector of .1 • axation,Lx- „ Ira• + lark Doc : 96102253 Rect: 175478 1830. 00 11/14/1996 03: 44:OOpm . � . .:, .i:. � r,;�1s.k � 1!!" f/ ,{: :^:7' ��•._ ti.•A'A;d R•T. r .. `' . 11 /19 14:05 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 PAGE: 18 11/19/96 TUE 14:03 FAX 1 51 ?8 7821 TICOR TITLE X018 ZS s + 24'111 . ___ e is requested all tax statements After RecordlnE return to: Until a change address: i� shall be sent to the following 'Cr. Terry Hauck Gerding/Ed?en Development tCo Company ..7 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue 4650 SW Macadam Portland, OR 97201 3 Suite 1700 Pacwest Center Portland, OR 97204 STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED P CC F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to Gerding percent(50%)interest and Q Investment Company,an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty pe interest and `j Northwest Real Estate Advisors, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percent 1= (50%) interest, all as Tenants-in-Common, Grantee, the following described real property: co The real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 3 The true consideration for this conveyance is$1,776,pge70.e This dee gives effect to lot line adjustments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon, CC MIS 96-0019 and MIS 96-0025. THIS iNSTRLTMENT WILL NOIO LL F APPLICAB�E�ND USE DL WS AND IN VHS INSTRUMENT TN VIOLAT REGULATIONS_ BEFORE SIGNING HE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE PERSON ACQUiR�G FEE TIME TO LIMITS APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING ON LAWSUITS DEPARTMENT GAINSRT! FARMING OR USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Executed this lit hday of November, 1996. F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation ..0,0 ., :::::::::::::----1 1 i_ i, REAL We FEE TE :� j:ILi1• /� • By: Its: Vice—Fr•sl.dent (Notaries coutained on following page) • PARCEL 1 02 3t6 . ,: (17 2298x1 1/Qf1'CW lA.t 1 — STATUTORY 'BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 11 /19 14:06 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 5032281285 PAGE: 19 11/19/96 TUE 14:03 FAX 1 5C 28 7821 TICOR TITLE_ 01019_—r— r STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) - - - -•+, - ) ss. 4..•. •.. : County ofRelea • Flo 2ber 11, 1996before me, Grace D. Lumibao • personally zed and Laszlo G. 11 red a Geof F.I.G.A. Dulek Company, a California corporation, pally known to fives of ns whose se names scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged me to be the persons whose names am and that by their signatures to me that they executed the same in their authorized c�l e, the hat by acted, natures executed on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf instrument. ^- _ .. % cRA U1S FOR CALIFORNIA • `�3":l Notary t k—Cali NOTARY PUBLIC F November 12, 1999 � ,; Los ,Expires NW 12�tqp� My Commission Expires: �� My Comm.Exd (17/32298110�t49/7•C1U131508.1) 2 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 3 tii'• ____imm;fimlimmi..misgiwimimmrimmmmimimim 11 /19 14:06 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 5032281285 11/19/96 TUE 14:04 FAX 1 ; '28 7821 PAGE: 20 TICOR TITLE - ----- --— — -- --- Wino • • •• Parcel 1 • Legal Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range I West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600,recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission, April 20, 1981,said point also being on the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract, South 01°11'39" West, 4.10 feet; thence continuing along said west line South 15°40'08"West, 76.53 feet; thence South 77°12'09"West, 95.77 feet; thence South 01°16'19"West,25.00 feet to the centerline of Varns Street (vacated); thence along said centerline South 88°43'41"East. 115.29 feet; thence South 07°54'41"West, 228.94 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing South 07°54'41"West, 158.06; thence North 88°54'48" West, 144.10 feet; thence South 00°00'00" East, 10.29 feet; thence North 89°01'25" West, 146.05 feet; • • thence North 69°16'44" West, 196.93 feet; • thence North 30°39'10" West, 156.10 feet; • EXHIBIT :"A" . Page::1 0iV 2 x. • �r �j. 11 /19 14:07 1996 FROM: 11/19/96 TUE 14:04 FAX 1 -1 28 5038 228 7821 10: 5032281285 PAGE. 21 _ 7821 TICOR TITLE a 021 • • thence North 05°45'39"East, 127.05 feet; c,, thence North 32°51'35"West,249.22 feet; • thence along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 70.00 feet,a central angle of 42°55'31", a long chord of North 46°41'42"East, 51.22 feet, an arc length of 52.44 feet; thence North 68°09'27"East, 135.52 feet to the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along said right-of-way along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 50.22 feet,a central angle of 09°17'23", a long chord of South 56°09'46"East, 8.13 feet,an arc length of 8.14 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way South 60°48'28"East,58.26 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 516.22 feet, a central angle of 07°15'16",a long chord of South 64°26'06"East, 65.32 feet,an arc length of 65.36 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way South 21°39'45"West, 105.41 feet; thence South 68°20'15"East, 12,00 feet; thence South 88°36'39"East,78.86 feet; thence South 01°26'21"West, 60.00 feet; thence South 88°36'39"East, 130.03 feet; thence South 01°23'21"West, 59.00 feet; thence South 88°36'39"East, 101,22 feet; thence South 01°22'45"West, 17.13 feet; • thence South 17°58'28"East,79.72; thence South 01°23'21"West, 80.64 feet; thence South 89°58'00"East, 116.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 5.09 acres or 221,597 square feet. EXHIBIT "A" Page a2 of 2 11 /19 14:07 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 50322812P° PAGE: 22 11/19/96 TUE 14:05 FAX 1 I 228 7821 TICOR TITLE Z022 _ _. -__- __ _ , • 'r. • , .; ...•....- :4.;'.:.!.4 r .', • • '' ....i. v 'i.• ..'•'.13'..•••••• • ••• .. • - . .. . .. , . . i • . :.STATE OF OREGON } SS t... . •:,.. •., • • r . ...count,/of washington . ,. • . . , .. . . t• • • • ,.• is Jerry ; , emit ! ):. . of Asseaa- . .• . . . . __.11__, ._-. ...ment-argi• -.., 14.re 7;". ,-•..,1 . 0 County - •-. --- ■:. ,:. , : ;:, .Clerk for ::. • 1.1.'. ......* • ,.•.the with ., RV • ‘‘rThk' • .' ' . -'•--calved • - .,...;1/4. • :. ‘... ,.. t - .. s '11,:ttr. '. .; -f aald .iv.• .. ....N. and re/4- do., tit v:i,,:ve,,,ii,: - . .•• ..1. • • ,; county. :sir ' 4 fieryk4"3 1:' * '. . .. , •! : •• ' • • •C'''.•-••-"::‘ '''..■C' ' \.°.V.• FCI:="?';'. •' .••• . . at • . •• . • • ..: I... . . '7.,.. :. .,..0 _ ...).11)? ca • I • 4 • • ' ' • f!? i-1 - ?.:Af'""• • ,c, \ Nrz...fte • 44, ;., . • z tb, ..*.;i c:- i • -. - : •On ••!rector Of ¶. .. - _don,Ex- lark 1. • 1 ' : ' Doc • 96102252 Rect: 175478 1589. 00 !. • 11/14/1996 03: 44: 00pm . • . . . V • . . . v • • . • . . k 3 i • • i • • . • t • i • r 1 , I.{ . . , 1 i • 1" • i 1 . 1 . • • ; ! . • • • - • . • , . • • • • • ' 1 • ,, 1 • . „ • . • . • i . • • i . . • . • ' 1' I• A: : - • -: k •. t:4:. . • . • • ' ;•• e;•'''.'•••'. .... ....- 'il'• . •.;2.:'?.w.'''';••••• • -';' r;• • 4 ' ••:•'...•'.• . • - . • •'• ' . . • ... • • ... .. .• . .•,....;....... .i.,,,...: •.••:.-:...,i.'•:•-*,•• "••••._•&• . •"' -/-•-•• •:•,•!--'''. - ,,,,,,-11,--k ••:-.4-1,...14...-,-. . .•4 ..:,....b,....;... „ ..• ,;...,. .- .4... .... •,. t...,. .44J, !, • ' • , .....J-.. .. .,-i. i, ,..:.,eie.1.• , . .. - . .r. . - . ,. . . ••4'-i.';'....c._-•.1.•,..1:',.'11.if?'; ''.-.••• .*:.'..-4 i ''. r ' ""' _ .4. • ''Aft A :::• ,• 1 -_•:. - :•.I...,,,,A tAlirr*,•!3 ••, 11 /19 14:08 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 11/19/96 TL•E 14:05 FAX 1 228 7821 PAGE: 23 TICOR TITLE 111023 li ' . , 10-4- After Itecarcing return to:=— --- Until-a change is requested all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: M Terry C. Hauck • •: Gerding/Pdlen Development Company C.'7"- 1211 S.W •Fifth Avenue 4650 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 220 t Suite 1700 Pacwest Center Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 lW STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 5 CC F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to Gerding Co Investment Company, an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percent(50%)interest and C.7 Northwest Real Estate Advisors, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percent 1 (50%) interest, all as Tenants-in-Common, Grantee, the following described real property: CO The real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Its aJI 44 The true consideration for this conveyance is $1,535,691.30. This deed gives effect to c. lot line adjustments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon, case file numbers MIS 96-0011, • g MIS 96-0019 and MIS 96-0025. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Executed this 1lrhday of November, 1996. F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation • ;_ , 4:1/141, WASHINGTON COUNTY .r: REAL PROPERrr TRANSFER nix, (-11-1,': ~- : • � t /S34•0G l . j1. 9i mss: Vice--Pisegiden 7 . .„./. FEE PAID OATS By: , ( y: - . Its: _ Vic'e—P = •ent (Notaries contained on following page) NORTHWEST QUADRANT 3. - STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE i DEED 0 (• tssiiortaarr utstsoa.►) 7 lad; .i '�'• t : ..... «..� :: �•-�.;+r• �ir •'!" .�.. .n 'N .K. #• ,{s:,,�a�. e:r�l�,'+yq;r. ='• - ,•�`� .-.iF:i 11 /19 14:08 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 • 11/19/96 TILT 14:06 FAX 1 10: 5032281285 PAGE: 24 228 7821 TICOR TITLE ---- — _ _ 421024 . ' . • STATE OF CALL ORNIA ) SS. i County of Los Angeles ) • on November 11_, 1996 before me, Grace D. Lwnlbao personally Gerald A. Du1ek and Laszlo G. Heredy , authorized representatives of F.I.O. Holding Company, a California corporation, personally known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed the within,�, and that by their lures to me that they executed the same in their capacities, the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. , '�� + C W4E D.U.N0A0 ` . .;: r Corr/T*00n#1077656 'No —Calticenkt Artgalsa cow NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA Cuvn.Fxdtss Novi7.t947 My Commission Expires: November 12, 1999 • • r_ 2 7 STATUTORY BARGAIN POND SALE DEED 3 (17/3729S/102148/701./131.3011.1) •r 11 /19 14:09 1996 FROM: 11/19/96 1 i•0: 503228 1285 TLE 14:06 FAX 1 PAGE: 25 COR TITLE Z 025 4 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of:REAL PROPERTY • • • Northwest Quadrant A tract of land situated in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 1,T.2 S.,R 1 W., W.M., being a portion of"VAR-NS.ACRES"recorded in Book 9 of Records of Plats,Page 3, Washington County Plat Records,Washington County, Oregon,being more partzcuia:•ly described as follows: Bevioning at a point on the north line of said"VARNS ACRES"at the westerly right-of- way line of "S.W. 68th Parkway",at a 5/8"iron rod set in Survey No.P.S. 20,144, Washington County Survey Records; thence,along the westerly right-of-way line of S.W. 68th Parkway, South 02°37'47" West, 393,77 feet to the beginning point of a 50.22 foot radius curve to the left; • thence,along the arc of said curve to the left having a central angle of 13°36'06", the long chord bearing South 06°40'16"East, 16.23 feet, an arc length of 1630 feet; thence, leaving said right-of-way line, South 63°09'2T'West, 129.19 feet to the be}'rning point of a 100.00 foot radius curve to the left; thence, along the arc of said curve to the left having a central angle of 27°38'02",the long chord beating South 54°20'26"West,47.76 feet,an arc length of 48.23 feet; thence,North 26°29'23"West,249.47 feet; • thence,North 3750'27"West, 101.51 feet•, thence,South 58°50'19"West,42.98 feet; • •• • • ExEmisa './4M �. ��, • • �. 7� ' 'i. .. a•: �.y."• ''+:•��;�y � •h ;T' : -�r•+h.! ?, �":�Pl�'�:�'-'�:Y .�..�e''�,�':�'1 �f•�.'�i:',4:i�:::'.Jk.._rs;-..:Ygt 11 /19 14:09 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 5032281285 PAGE: 26 11/19/96 TfJE 14:06 FAX 1 228 7821 TICOR TITLE 0026 . - ___---,.•e-'-•-- • •1 • r •r ''•• °p9'41"Fast, 37.86 feet; ! ` , tbcnce,South a 1 . 156.91 feet to the northeasterly right-of-way line of State • thence; South s8°50'19"West, .Haghway 217; . .• thence,along said right-of-way line,North 31°06'53" west,370.48 feet to the north line . of said"VARNS ACRES"; thence, along the north line of said"YARNS ACRES" South 88°36'39"East, 701.88 feet . to the point of beginning of this description Containing 201233 Square feet, or 4.62 acres,more or less r • 10450114doc ak • I • E • . . • . • EXHIBIT; ,71.A. .. , 5• t ' . . . Page 2 of •• 11 /19 14:09 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0. 5032281285 11/19/96 TUE 14:07 FAX 1 F `28 7821 PAGE: 27 TICOR TITLE -- — — —_T. ,. X027 . STATE OF OREGON•• -' • :,1.• • • s • •' • 'i; •'• County of Washington SS • t . t,Jerry ng4l'4,n ,fpc_ of Assess- : »� ` ' ment an n T`3G� to County•'1 j • Clark for •••,- a,, •,� MIN that• . _ .. _ _ _:.....;:....&1 —._- --,_! ..._ _ —_ -- -the-wlthetl it• •;:_.t� •Vra recutved and regontied'. •f.:;4,. W t ;o! said .. . •• 1 , 0, •countyj * x;•'4~.44 , % c••'., * r. • :� '' �d- 1R, ACeo 'D Iroctor of• ! -•,„, -arklwR .• • axktion,Ex- I • ••• • • Irk Doc : 96102251 II Rect: 175478 58. 00 • 11/14/1996 03: 44:00pm . 1 • I •1 . : .1 1 • . . • • 1 • i . 1 I 1 i I • I 1 iiI i 1 :I ' .1 . 1 ' 1 I ' • : 1 . i • :' i:r 1 • • • 1 • :r ;~ ►....• l ; ; . ;.y :;sip: ?":s:•:%.+.• 'i,:; ;; ..: ' 4, l.. • :•,- ..' , _! . ,,.4 Y .44,,.4..:44,4,12.. .;�::...}.d.;�F:` � ,,.,.,. :'.1. .t. •�'4,' ...�.�..,.,, -•r'C `'S .x,... •�' ? ... i +•,7; `?7.> •tt!I"��F� ' yk. '1�� r NIIIMIIIIIIEIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII 11 /19 14:10 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 11/19/96 TUE 14:07 FAX 1 T0: 5032281285 PAGE: 28 228 7821 TICOR TITLE — -- — — — Z1028 • • • _ After Recording return to: Until a change is requested all tax statements._ _. shall be sent to the following address: F.I.G. Holding Company CA 4680 Wilshire Boulevard NO CHANGE os ge es. a if rnfa 44010 Attn: Real Estate Investments 3 STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED F.I.G. HOLDING COMPANY, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to F.I.G. f,.., HOLDING COMPANY, Grantee, the following described real property: Q The real property described in Exlsbit "A" attached hereto, C.) The the consideration for this conveyance is SO Dollars. The purpose of this deed is CO to give effect to certain lot line adjustments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon case file mra numbers MIS 96-0011, MIS 96-0019 and MIS 96-0025. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLAT ION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE CC, LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Executed this 1 i ttday of November, 1996. GRANTOR: F.I.G. HOLDING COMPANY, a California corporation -''fVice-President By: _. Its: Vice-President (Notary contained on following page) 1 - STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED; . . c2 07/322981102148/PCW13:o119.1) • y` ( �•;44#r�. .s - : 11 /19 14:10 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 T0: 5032281285 PAGE: 29 11/19/96 Tit 14:08 FAg 1 ?28 7821 TICOR TITLE X1029 . STATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) __ --__— - County of Loa Angeles ) • Grace D. Lumibao personally On , November 11' It 996 befogs me, appeal ' Gerald A. Dulek and Laszlo G. Heredy , known authorized representatives of F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation, personally to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed �e capacities, and that by their signatures o to n the that they t the pd same the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed on the instrument the persons, the instrument. - .7 01060.1141110 ;• NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA � !'� COf� �palaomio - My Commission Expires: _ November 12, 1999 Los MOO i..�"�-°,-I tJDfaM�� y .-4.`",--- .My cow bltMlls"12'1954 3 . (I7f,S7298/t02141�TCH/131b19.1? . . 2 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED . . . .. •::: :i....;i„,:::::.4r.7.4..:kir;18....k..i. :4;:,: . :.., : : : 4 !.....:.:.:.!.;;:;i'ik:' ..:::.. . I.:. •.14. :!....Air.t.,....,::::•:,;.::: , ,,..,,...,-:::::-4; ,.-.:•= ;....,;;;:i.Y.i,, ,.. 11 /19 14:11 1996 FROM:T 11/19/95 14:08 1 5038 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 TICOR TITLE_____ 8 FAX 1 5 !128507 3 Z8 78Z1 PAGE: 30 4 a 030 WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC. ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Phone: 503 684.0652 Fax: 50.3 624-0157 Gerding Project No.: 1045-01H-96 . November 4, 1996 Revised November 5, 1996 i Legal Description f A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South,Range 1 Wezt, Willamette Meridian,City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon,more particularly described as follows: i Commencing at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No.600,recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission, April 20, 1981,said point also being on the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; 3 thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract,South 01°11'39"West,4.10 feet; thence continuing along said west line South 15°40'08"West, 76.53 feet; thence South 77°12'09"West, 95.77 feet; . thence South 01°16'19" West,25.00 feet to the centerline of Vames Street(vacated); thence along said centerline South 88°43'41"East, 1 15.29 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence South 07°54'41" West, 387.00 feet; thence North 88°54'48" West, 144.10 feet; thence South 00°00'00"East, 10,29 feet; thence North 89°01'25"West, 146.05 feet; thence North 69°16'44" West, 196.93 feet; thence North 30°39'10"West, 156.10 feet; _ thence North 05°45'39"East, 127.05 feet; 4j EX BIB ' 'A" thence North 32°51'35"West,249.22 feet; Page of 3 f .lil Pacific Corporate Center,15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway,Suire 150,Tigard, Oregon 97224 1 . ii •.r`{.:a'.Vi •.i.%:,;,-,::;:i r :1 , ."/.i.'. j il S� }Y:y,..�� 4,,::• ;• - f. I:, ` 1 11 /19 14:11 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 To: 5032281285 11/19/96 TLiE 14:09 FAX 1 228 7821 PAGE: 31 TICOR TITLE k . X031 Page 2 of 3 • Property Description •t. Project No.: 1045-01H-96 thence along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having:a radius of 70.00 feet,a central angle of 42°55'31", a long chord of North 46°41'42"East,51.22 feet,an arc length of 52.44 feet; thence North 68°09'27" East, 135.52 feet to the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along said right-of-way along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 50.22 feet,a central angle of 35°32'46",a long chord of North 33°44'42"West,30.66 feet,an arc length of 31.16 feet; thence South 68°09'27"West, 129.19 feet; • thence along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 27°38'02", a long chord of South 54°20'26"West,47.76 feet,an arc length of 48.23 feet; thence North 26°29'23" West,249.47 feet; thence North 37°50'27" West, 101.51 feet; thence South 58°50'19"West,42.98 feet; thence South 31°09'41"East, 17.86 feet; thence South 58°50'19"West, 156.91 feet to a point on the northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway 217; thence along said right-of-way South 31°06'53"East,74.34 feet; thence South 26°16'20"East,248.92 feet; thence South 33°19'28"East, 77.38 feet; thence South 88°43'41"East, 111.00 feet; thence South 02°34'34"West, 162.27 feet; thence South 31°32'53"East, 229.96 feet to a point of spiral curvature; thence southeasterly along said spiral curve to the intersection of the westerly right-of-way limits of Interstate Highway 5; thence leaving aforementioned northeasterly right-of-way limits of State Highway 217 along the westerly right-of-way limits of Interstate Highway'S North 22°01'53"East, 533.55 feet; • thence North 05°03'44"East, 300.67 feet; • thence North 01°14'53"East, 89.06 feet; EXHialT 'A" Page 2:•of 3 • . 1 :; �'• }, S .r '.•rY y, ':y r .';. .i vim„ � ;ci .TC L'' .' 'z '�5.?�1•i�:., �; fit;:_�.: '.%�C.7ra. :'�, -r af•' 11 /19 14:12 1996 FROM: 1 503 228 7821 TO: 5032281285 • 11/19/96 TUE 14:09 FAX 1 228 7821 TICOR TITLE PAGE: 32 RI 032 • - - - - -- - —' Page 3 of 3 — — —' • '1•.s: • Property Description Project No.: 1045-01H-96 • . 1 thence North 20°25'16"East, 16.30 feet; thence leaving afoementioned right-of-way limits along the south right-of-way of S.W. 66th Avenue identical with the centerline of Varnes Street(vacated)North 88°43'41"West, 53.08 feet to the true point and place of beginning; Containing 8.86 acres or 385,762 square feet. • } i 1 l 1 • PMB L IT 'A' • • Pays 3 of 3 • rY. : •;1: i" {_11141 .'•ty T :.iti - v '+F'4l'1'.,. '�+EY�?1' .Y :410 .'i5�!�. :,;)1; :a...l 1. . •�'"44."!'..•. )''.�.�'�1. '••1 'h , .."r� �W',.�il�Nli�'� �j.� •� ���.� �•.. 1. '��..�. �:t'.. i 1 IJ'; •� '� � .i.'�• ii ((��f3 r I, . .�h M A= 42'55'31" • • R = 7°•° EARNERS INSURANCE _ . N 1 = 52.44' ` p i •11996 4, CH = 51.22' IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 SE 3 n I N46'41.42`E v "9' . �, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILL? n ' g �Uak�t4nsulfanls Inc. o= 09'1723',4, °� 5� R = 50.22' v,�,o• CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNT ,L, m• H E h; l = 8.14' ' - N Ec t\3,.5.,.•5‘;* • o CH - 8.13' '. A A = 45'46'08' m 3 3 127.05' '0 S56.09'46•E . R = 119.93' _"� H m m N05'45 39 E a L = 95.80' _ t -.� c '" A a A= 0715'16 .CH 93.28' o o N ,c�6NOp* I* R = 516.22' N20'15'15"W _ . fr1 • - �59 L ■ 65.36' "aa S.W. 68TH. 0 �3 10.(C1 CH - 65.32' ,c‘• - - - - t _ TAY L01 40p 864'26'06" ‘V / • u ti y�o `� NO • 7'47' PKY 332.45' ! o n I �^•) lZ TAX LOT 400 5G ""4 1 �' �� < N?i J d�N46'48'37'E 49.79' m < c 3 - 2 -_ .._._EXI_S__TIN_G_ LOT LINE _ ._I3 ;off � !0545 E /N30'38'S0'E 19.22' TAX LOT 400 m o 6 IN nano N68 20'15'W N30'38.50"E 28.54' EXISTING LOT UNE N `O 12.00' O 16'57'37' _ w z R = 119.93' 4'J7. 556'26'33"E 18.32' In n '' ,015-9 I 60.00 L 35.50' 6 4s' LOT SUN C • P. N01'26'21"E / CH - 35.37' vs9'�9F w A = 19'24'40 N51•37'07"W N55'433 57" TAX LOT "?0 rn 8.02" p n z = 32'26'44' 1�o R L = 574 89 o EXISTING CI = 27'22'26" R 161.00' o I n °, PARCEL 1 co- = n4.os R - 388.26' L - s,.,r �, D cow TAX LOT 100 64,197,1 m 577'46 04'E L = 185.50' CH _ @s.ss PARCEL 4 Z , D In to in ' 0 - 59.00' - CH = 183.74' S71 06'25"E N io _ it• !'JT 300 TAX LOT 200201,469 p N N 73'47'09`W m • _ --- - N01'23'21"E - - - N o - -- _ -___ t - a, 3 UNE - -.. _ . TAX LOT 300164,232 m m v z n. EXISTING LOT UNE <hj I 500'00'00"E PARCEL PROPOSED LOT UNE /_ c••71 TAX LOT 400126.926. ° 3 10.29' n o Y /, ((/ > p u TAX LOT 200 z� I TAX/OT 200 0 1 iv TAX LOT 200 +" cw �(./ / • PROPO m N01'22.45-E } eu I n n � o a 17.13 V/ v 'id ao 6 0 235'20"E 00 n r. n N 60.23' t PARCEL. 1...221,597.5 S 3 N01.23'21'E a2g.V, I N N 0 N� PARCEL 2....92,499.2 S ao - 80.64' 14\' 19'12 W 1 PARCEL 3 co r 3 801 16'19"W !t n° NOt'19'35"E in k + 25.00'.. r 0 50.73' PARCEL 3....89,790.5 S co °�° o 0 w v ap1p N EXISTING LOT LINE v PARCEL 4...154,615.5 9 O' .?4 ,4_ �1 u1 N W Z 158.06' Z n Y I r TAx/L/T�100 N b, =i. 807• m 5J 2 IA(,2/OO 5 '„�) TAX LOT 100 S4.41-n, 22 @.94• ti 76. _I N' co vi 3 @'00' 8154.08.4,. 279.14' N Ca FARMERS 213.76 50111'39"W 492.90' PROPOSED LOT LINL• -AUJU5 I 4.10' VARIES S.W. 66th AVE. I 501'11'39"W I W E STLAKE 95' CONSULTANTS 1xc. - - - - - - - _ 1 ENGINEERING ♦ SURVEYING • PL./INTERSTATE 5 PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER REVISED OCTOBER 23, 1996 15115 S.W. SEQUOIA PARKWAY, SUITE 150 FAX 503; 6 • I \ L_ ' i \J I \ LI _/ I ..J �J 1 \ v (— I o 0\'y FOR: FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP �55� - ' \ BA. A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF NI THE THE N( 5 3 ;r THE � � 1 ON 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN .� C��S STATE n ' CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON AS(P �0 P NUMBS 1�., : • o SURVEYED OCTOBER 1996 �10 - J 322 PI c 3 3 (S\1 \0 26'16': —4 " o . C " a P� EXISTING LOT LINE n• r_ • z RI 0 ;3 0 w CO 1`` \'\'v� \aGS O I��4 fs�� -sy: cP. - o' CeF.p `S Q, '�1 FN SW �'. / �P \S OF p `Pi. �I 531'09'41'E i '-1 d VP' 6�6 92 17.86' PGA = SUI (" s o • N 2�0' o o m • V 3O • • 558'50'19"W a SW Z N j • 42.98' m 0 / s N • •0 I ce PL./ / -5- ii Ad'b �h,,L1 ,e2- ro °i m P� C / 3 '�O , / Z CV 7 0 = 27'38'02" • �1 N0 F 5 o i ,� 0 EXISTING LOT R = 100.00' LINE J. I N ; DO D 3 s X V in °. L - 48.23' 1•• x.11 No w BO Z > CH = 47.76' 9.` 'ys N 1D O = 42'55'31` 554 20'26'W `ZA 6'`L9 ADJUSTED LOT UNE -- 30' 1 r1 ; >r r / NO2'34'34"E Z R = 70.00' N� BO x EXISTING LOT LINE m " a �i 162,27' L = 52.44' I • v CH = 51.22 A = 18'36'06' t- ° A • \ �� ,�tig3 f I N46'41'42"F• R =_6.30' PARCEL 4.62 AC.REA PC,Q� BO n •\>> • \'S q., i , CH = 16.23' 201,273 SOFT. �� = BO O n o- `13 �9`ti •iP a 506'40'16"E JP '0 n o 0 I 1-11`q. w �� , U Yz RE 4,- ,� L = 35'32'46" �' d i0. (531'22'13-E 88.73')1 c5 0 Y a �PV h,'-if-) 3016 ' `ra a_, 528'48'40"E 88.76' \., m BC • 't 0 Cr P�÷ • 127.05' ��� CH = 30.66' (500'03'40"W 333.60' 1 n .r a• • NOS'45 39 E • I N33'44'4:.'W ` • 17 S02'37'47"W 393.27') 1 I — -7 . /r~ ,q).-� �� I �= 09'17'2'1" ,• ; 0� •��.59`� R = 50.22' Ao (500'03'40-W _363.17')1_ ; S.W. 68TH. , N30 L = 8.14' �, S02'37'47"W 362.85' , 1 • I CH = 8.13' ©1 ,,w' 556'09'46"E ® NO2'37 47 E , © P K Y� } , ADJUSTED LOT LINE I 332.45' 4 3 $4j (S00'03'40"W 332.73')1 _ ' • ° S60'48'28"r A= 62'43'45" J I a�' >1 � _ R = 119.93' n F: N � ' co C0' L = 131.30' N = on R - 26'39'56" EXISTING LOT UNE �w`'w C. S R = 516.22' / CH = 124.84' z 2 L - 240.25' / N28'44'03"W I m in! CH = 238.09' (563'22'59"E 29.40')1 cc r) z° r� w S74'08'26'E Y Q j kc Z S60'58'13"E 29.42' (, 3 0IJ I a 2- 4` vi • QG PARCEL AREA > (S76'30'55"E 211.03')1 P.' m 0 �°' 7.21 AC. 31 z S73'59'15-E 210.46' .�`' a In In JQ`r 314,096 SQ.FT. r o vi = \A = 27'22'26" JP N ~o R = 388.26' EXISTING LOT LINE P .5 I -� • 1 L = 185.50' rn 0`` ~ � - >ipp'FT +• ro 0 c'4 b) CH = 183.74'. 0 N z i''In •• Hi,1•I-rnn"w •■ P4PCFl APFA O al F F 'htf f'AI \S'' 6\� 4. 1/.60 1 . ! �N �` ryAg9 tt 3 � 558'50'19' p W i:' ♦G FOUND MONUMENT A5 N01ED 6 . - 'Q(FOR MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS SEE PAGE 2) y . "C--.. O,43 1 JP v°«� 0 SET 5/8' X 30' IRON ROD WITH YELLOW (((///� 3 , 1�0 pc: 7 A = 27'38'02" • t PLASTIC CAP MARKED 'WESTLAKE r $ EXISTING LOT R - 100.00' LINE .► ��� ,0c F CONSULTANT5'. ?. P* -- Y L - 48.23' j ,� O 3 ; ® CH - 47.76' A9 9 L3 ADJUSTED LOT E( )1 RECORD DATA PER SURVEY NUMBER 20,144 ' ao A• 42'55'31' 55470'26"W 1 6�1- n i o:, j NO2'34'34"E Z R - 70.00' �1 EXISTING LOT 0 -e 162.27' 'L = 52.44' ` N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE �' 8 CH - 51.22 A - 18'36'06' �i -0 5") N46'41'42'F-. & R • 50.22' .PARCEL AREA n g i / \� V+ •'S1• ajfi I L - 16.30' '�„ ' N‘..!,.."./... .o. �7 II •, CH • 18.23' 2 AC. q•"L2" L i 5 r� I 1P:41:� •sa, ap 506'40'16"E 73 SOFT. j -4 ;1, 5' C.L. G"F . A- 35'32'46" ��mod_ c. (S31'22'13"E 88.73')1 14 m IBC TA=31'12' '' •y5 R - 50.21' ,.2 528.48.40"E 88.76' O r TS-572.08' �°2 ti5� L • 31.16 'ate Z _ r C1feN40'46'01"W 737.28' -it • 127.05' CN33'44046 W 17 ($00'03'40"W 39; " i L2' NO5'45 39 E I. S02'37'47'W 39; C. r / SOOZ SP. 4,I.• `�610`��1 A- 09'17'2'f" 8 . 5 3 9 I R = 50.22' • _(S00'03'40-W _363.1 0 i a-1.0 O 3 {SO L • 8.14' �'O 19 502'37'47"W 362 D 5 4 G• / • q I CH S56'09'46"E �� ® NO2'37 47�� Z E. ADJUSTED LOT UNE 3J n 3 C Px�/ ,� a I �' (S00 03'40"W 33 In ° �Id EXISTING LOT LINE �y %2 U 560'48'28"E A= 62'43'45" • °- o . v� _ R • 119.93' 3 �• / S� Q I R - 516.22' CH =1 124.84' EXISTING LOT ( E x Jr), / �O. �� 2� L • 240.25' N28'44'03"W o o O CH • 238.09' 3'� 02 w 574'08'26"E (56372'59"E 29.40')1 w z S60'S8'13'E 29.42' !i67 / . z • GQ I UQ �/p •cs. D P PARCEL AREA > (S76'30'55"E 211.03')1 P 7.21 AC. w 573'59'15"E 210.46' `2 "L2" of PARCEL ARt� 3_ Q 3� z Q? 8.86 AC. " JP 314,096 SOFT, P• 500' SP. '�'o • A- 27'22'26' J -�.�_� S-12'30' Z 385.762 SO.FT�- �' s.� I o R - 388.26' EXISTING LO a-1.0 r P -' L 185.50' 0 O~ U N in CH • 183.74' �Q Os pARCEL ARI z I z p -II r :. N73'47'09"W w(572< in,Onn n o, 5.61 AC. f1 N of N N O0 r� 244,406 50.x., to 10.29 ; S01 - 01'16'19'W N�' `� N w N 0 25.00' w w 1 3 w �c EXISTING LOT LINE I O I ESQ' 51 4. -J_ ID N O:r m 'r° EXISTING LOT UN S22 ADJUSTED LOT LINE w jo n ..-I z vi :47 '-D. N� of.. Z y LOT 7 (� J g CALC'D SJJS LOT 50754 41"µµ J87, 10 t 501 11'39'W _ VAR ACRES 56.49 INT-X. 5' 2 YARNS ACRES 00' o• 5j5,* 6.5J. / 38.01' 492.90' l� .4 5J o 00g"W Ol l S01'11'39'W 535.01' DETAIL 'A" O 505'03'44'W 300.67' • • •• 4.10' ``✓/ VARIES S.W. 66th A VE. 89.06' O 50111'39"Y/ DATE S01'14'53"W SEPT. 24, 1996 I DRAWN BY CRP i n% :�143Z 20' JO'I}' 95' CHEGKEP 1Y OP t NOV.20.1996 1:47PM TICOR METRO TITLE DT NO.089 P.1/4 COMMERCIAL TITLE DIVISION J TICOR TITLE INSURANCE "At TICOR we measure our effectiveness in terms of our customers'success" FAX TRANSMITTAL Telephone (503) 224-0550. FAX (503) 242-1964 IDATESENT ---• COMPANY NAME City of Tcrd I PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET ATTENTION _ .._._..... ...... .._..._.. ..._..I Will D tAndrea, I • FAX NO. - - _ ... .... .. _...__._ _._..- -- 684,7297 5 _.. FROM Carol Ray (503) 727-0280 MESSAGE: •41,.S: Q.r F $ Iz$uxanCe .&1711p documents •r. ._+____wry+._+.r — ww..�_.. 1 _4._i_i_-- _ W5_� • � yR.'1e.•.M.•M. .._w.ww rr—.rr.+.y_r r•_.ww._..rr •�_ .— .w.W.i—wt.._ __ _ �.-.r.qn,—wiles• -- ...._.......... ..... . • • in 1 •`Vic_ ��—, `��R i!.` w - Quad-County Title Plant Multnomah County Clackamas County Washington County Columbia County 1629 S.W. Sabi-inn RtrPAt • PrwiTryriA !1D 0,71n: 1 TO r 42'55.31" FARMERS INSURANCE " y tigilda 31 R = 70.00' 1 --"! 0 41996 L = 52.44' °j a 0 ��q�`L 'N X4641'42 E IN THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 SE e.) n c ,tiake(:nnsufiants:lnr,. � A= 0917.23"Tp-01,. TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILL ..��� Q? m ‘k.5.1.1y5 R = so.22' CITY OF 11GARD, WASHINGTON COUN e w o '' 9 L = 8.14' r?N� , H >< lD 127.0$• + C556�9.46'E 1 R = 119.939 ` 3 "' Q�1 E C Si. ft i 6,0 N05.45 39 I6 A. 0715.16• .L j.. 99 3.28' A o ~' 1y .∎C; R = 516.22' N20'15'15'11 `�" y03 o L = 65.36' .� 0 A a to 04 = 65.32• .tit • S.W. 68TH. o TAX LOT Opp rc 46426'06" ^' t 0 3 ah Iz TAX LOT 400 yy° N'-t 47• FKY.332 45' o a !� V /y J > 3 N?7�9, d-•N46.4B'37"E 49.79' SO '�'� 3 �J. EXI511NG LOT LINE J3 /05 43 f N3038'S0"E 19.22' TAX LOT 400 r ~ '1 H 111 n o xi - I Q I b I :IT. 'co N6BZ0.15'W - N30J8'S0 - ••••. lJ� 12�" • = 16.5r3-.7. 'E 28.54' EXISTING LOT UNE `O z R = 119.93 '�3j. 456 2633"E 18.32' -•°u -I = 60.00 L= 35.50' sQ tB� X01'16"21'E •CH - 35.37' s9. 9 F M+f t0 - TAX LOT 'pp 1924'40 X5137 07"W X55'43'47' LOT SIA C :4 .'r. O .�o R = 516.22' 8.02 = 32'26'44' 70 1 m L .. 174_89' a= 2722'26' R = 161.00' ° EXISTING H•PARCEL 1 '��CH 174.05' R - 386.26• 1 - 91.17' ° , ° ° ��- 57746'04"E L = 185.50' CH •. 89.96 'A R C E L 4 TAX LOT 100__.64,197 s3 r fr1 1 VI ° 59.00' 'h TAX LOT 300 = 183.74' S71'06.25`E „n e y NOl'23'21'E ,a �f. UNE - N734T09•W _�- -- -. TAX LOT 200._.201,469. '..' p d N a O1 EX1S11NC LOT UNE -- El El TAX LOT 300..»164,232 In « v sop ao�oo'E s R A R C E L '1 PROPOSED LOT UNE �^'� ._ 2 /60 TAX LOT 400. .126,928 r 0 . 7Ar. LOT 200 iv TAX LOT 200 r r.: .. PROPOSE NO122'45'E Z TAX OT 200 i°o ». 17.13' a pj oho" NOf 15'20"E DO a o NOtZ3'21'E Z6 N I r r B0. 3 PARCEL 1._221,597.5 S 3 n b 80.64' X17 1'I �/ w I PARCEL 3 °N 4 / 251��'19"W ., X01'19'35"E PARCEL 2,,.92,499.2 csi $m '/ ._ - _V - -0 50.73 F PARCEL. 3 .89.790.5 9 Qt-z ov', Alp'Y iA' 0 { 1 �f N EXISTING LOT LINE v PARCEL 4...154,615 5 tel i '158.06' z (/I n Y o-, I /TAX LET 100 �• S - 50754'41-W 228.94' v0i X78 o z /,/�j�Mg�"1 TAX LOT f00 387.00' S15Spo�'w I _,d'/V 279.14' ✓✓ v#i 213.76' FARMERS 1 50111.39"W 49 90 Z 4.10• VARIES S . 66th AVE, PROPOSED LOT LIN AuJUS •° 4..--- S0111'39"W -_ __ - -_ _ m - - 00 WESTLAKE 95' CONSULTANTS INC. _ - _ _ _ _ - _ d N ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • MD. INTERSTATE 5 - - PACIFIC CORPORATE CENTER REVISED OCTOBER 23, 1996 15115 S.A. SEQUOIA PARKWAY, SUITE 150 (503) TIGARR OREGON 97224 - FAZ (503) 8. i 1 \ L i JI \ U ' JI .J .JI \ V I__ I 1.6 FOR: FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP aMa3 .1 7. BA` A 2 i A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF °' THE g� R « 0 ; � / 8i'e1 �89� 11.86 1 LEG EN_U ..... O • 538'50'19' �, A® FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED 1� 4 (FOR MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS SEE PAGE 2) }�9 y0 I��`y O } 1 1 0`43 • at- 3. •.c 0 SET 5/8' 11 30' IRON ROD WITH YELLOW 50 �s < 1N PLASTIC CAP MARKED °WESTLAKE EXISTING LOT = 27'38'02' • }1 :1 I F .i I ;m CONSULTANTS". <ae + _ R = 100.00' UNE ` to �,i a t'� L - 48.23' 6 0 f ~'+ p1 - 47.76' 1' 3 S '� ��( )1 RECORD DATA PER SURVEY NUMBER 20,114 P-':-.A.-- -- O m A= 42'S5'Jl' S54'20'26"W I- ErL9� ADJUSTED LOT i „- x NO2'34'34-E z R = 70.00' NI6 t1 r • N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE '� 162,27' `L = 52.14' EXISTING LOT Q '` y \moo y 11 CH - 51.22 A 18'36'06" / F`�, }i`� N46'41'42"F• R - 50.22' .._,PARCEL AREA -7f�'• �?�� ��0. N}` 1°'96 I 1 •� CH 16.30'16 23' 2 AC. "� �� 5LC L �ti J� © �y I 1b9. �, SO6'40'16'E 73 SOFT. ` T 5' C.L1' �a PGA �Vl = V dam. �• (531'22'13"E 88.73')1 q /n K3 r s' $ �- 35'.2' v ' 11 TS-572.08' �=ci }1�4} L 3�16� �' �� S28'46'40'E 88.76' �0~ 1 9 CH=N40'46'01"w 737.28' CN 30.66' 0 (S00 03'40"W 39: Z.-4-r i L2' aP • 127.05' N33'44'42"W / 500' SP. i ,0 ND5'45 39 E • I •, 502'37'47"W n S=1 2'30' F,. Vl 39; C j \� I A= 09'17'7'1° 0-1.0 0 }Q}9 II R = 50.22' b 000'03'40-W 363.1 M ° `'' / • e1 I CH=�-6.14'3' © 0 /��� 502 37'47"W 3623 Z i 5_I 'try o S56'09'46"1 `' f M,�, MJ ADJUSTED LOT LINE I ® NO2'37 47 E 33 P1 0 ��� EXISTING LOT LINE U (500 03'40'W J3 /n • o o 4' ) t 560'18'28"E A= 62.43'15" + Y H -p � . �o a vl �^A - R - 119.93' I i 3 '1 ��' / �/0- 0 ° ^0 A -• 26'39'56" ' L = 131.30' 1- t 'O I I CH = 124.84' EXiST1NG LOT ( x frl / -2 S R y 516.22' O a L - 240.25' N28'44'03-W 3 ; S CH = 238.09' J °a 1� �� �I / (56372'59"E 29.40')l A w w 7S 4-08.26°E / �� .�, 7 ` • `Q zI 560'58'13"E 29.42' C°i / O S T PARCEL AREA f( (576'30'55-E 211.03')1 V. 'L2" of PARCEL np ; 7.21 AC. w 573'S9'15'E 210.16' `., 500' SP. 8.86 AC. n n aP 714,096 SOFT. I Z (;rl�T \ Q- S-12'30' z 385.762 SQ.FT� �' / ••••••• �J• • = 27-22'26° a� �_ ' a-1,0 p a., o R = 368.26' i I N -9 - EXISTING LO w ti L = ¶83. ' 0 z z m °r CH = 183.74' �r� O� 1 in p m(a,iv N73'47'09°W " PARCEL ARE O p I NpNrvaT n 5.61 AC. 500000 9 "E W ^ ai 244,106 SO,.r- t• 3 50116'19"W cy N N to I N o�0 25.00' 0 Ww 3w k EXISTING LOT LINE N S2 in x 4• °N e 'v ��i EXISTING LOT UNL 2b!SJ'W ADJUSTED LOT LINE tnN In •rJ �v O1 Pi z In La �� O,n f. Cr, �` 0-7 co ■col' z cc' LOT 7 1.• {y CALC'D SJJ • VA SOTS{41-µ 00' 10 . S0111'39-W YARNS ACRES 56.49' Z 0 '? INT-X. •SS• LOT 2 387, n RNS ACRES `° S 6.S3• f 38.01' O rn '�1 o j 1S 1p 08.W• • 492.90' l ��� O 501'11'39-W 535.01' -�[ DETAIL 'A" O 5O5'03'14-w n 7 300.67' • : " • • 4.10' VARIES S.W. 66th AVE. `D 89.06' • 50171'39"VI �1 50114'53'W O DATE SEPT. 24, 1996 _. - d- -- -W_Y__ c�0-t ^ �! SZ07S�0, DRAWN BY �P • 6 i5 cl1ECK[P or IV A I 5Dk 46-001q 1 - FqwesTAIWiinET i I . Agenda Item No.._ _____ i r , DI3lqic 0 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL 1 MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 1996 • STUDY SESSION Meeting of_____----1 > Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Council President Paul Hunt > Council Present: Council President Paul Hunt, Councilors Brian Moore, Bob Rohlf, and Ken Scheckla. 1 > Staff Present: City Administrator Bill Monahan; Associate Planner I Dick Bewersdorff; Community Development Director Jim Hendryx; Asst. to the City Administrator Liz Newton; Development Review Engineer Brian Rager; Senior Planner Nadine Smith; and City Recorder • Catherine Wheatley. , I > Agenda Review Armory: Bill Monahan, City Administrator, reported on the status of the discussions with the Armory. MS. Newton and Chief Goodpaster have met with them. The Armory has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, . October 29, to discuss their rental policy and new rental process. 1 4 Tr -County Center Application: In response to a question from Councilor Rohlf, Mr. Monahan said that the Mayor and Mr. Bewersdorff i have been talking with Mr. Christensen regarding the Tr -County Center application. The applicant did not request an extension within one-and-one-half years of the original application; therefore, the application was void. The City Attorney's office has provided a written opinion on this matter. Mt. Manahan commented that alterations to the application would be needed regardless. , (2) In response to a concern from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Monahan said . that Council could pull this matter up to review the staff I interpretation. He explained that he thought that staff could work with the applicant to package their application to go through both. levels of review simultaneously. , . Councilor Moore indicated support of the staff's decision. He asked if the applicant would continue to be willing to incorporate some of the design elements of the original Tigard Triangle plan. Mr. Monahan said that staff was attempting to work ,through issues with the applicant. Farmer's Insurance Office Building: Councilor Rohlf asked if Council needed to pull up the Farmers Insurance office building for review. Dick Bewersdorff, Associate Planner, explained that the applicant was meeting the requirements. The development was high quality. He noted that a large number of trees would be removed and the fees that would be assessed. Councilor Rohlf commented that if _ staff felt that the developer would put in a development consistent with the design overlay, then there wasn't a need to call it up for review. 4 , , Councilor Moore commented that he visited the site and thought that they could build the development with minimal tree removal since many of the trees ran down a gully. The Council reviewed a map to I determine where the trees were located. Mr. Bewersdorff commented that there wasn't much the City could do, the applicant was meeting code requirements. i i > 2040 Functional Plan: Mr. Monahan referred to the most recent changes in the 2040 Functional Plan, mentioning in particular the 1 increase of maximum retail square footage from 50,000 square feet to 6 60,000 square feet. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 1996 - PAGE 1 ki 1 ' Councilor Rohlf questioned from where a 60,000 square foot store ■ would draw its market. Nadine Smith, Senior Planner, commented that Metro wanted stores to draw from a small market area. Councilor Rohlf stated that he disagreed with Metro's intent. Ms. Smith explained that another change was the criteria a local jurisdiction had to use to approve something larger than 60,000 square feet. This criteria included a demonstration in the record that adequate transportation facilities would be available by the time the retail operation began and that adequate transportation facilities for the planned uses in the employment areas were included in the applicable Comprehensive Plan provision. Ms. Smith pointed out that this was unclear: what did "adequate" mean? Did the requirement mean funded or simply planned? In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Ms. Smith said that she thought Metro wanted them to have a plan for transportation facilities in the Comprehensive Plan by which they could judge a request for something over 60,000 square feet. Councilor Scheckla commented on the necessity of knowing where the funding was coming from when planning transportation. Ms. Smith reviewed the public hearing schedule on the Functional Plan and the adoption process; October 24 might be the last time to give input on the document. Mr. Monahan stated that a staff member would attend the meeting on October 24. The Council discussed the issue of large stores. Councilor Rohlf commented that grocery stores needed a minimum of 65,000 to 70,000 square feet to operate these days. Ms. Smith commented that Councilor Xvistad proposed dropping this title because Metro didn't know how to locate retail property and shouldn't be telling the local jurisdictions how to do it. Mr. Monahan said that another area of concern was the accessory units on all residential units. He reviewed Councilor Morrisette's proposal to allow each individual lot one accessory unit; the proposal was still under discussion at Metro. Mr. Monahan said that this issue would be discussed at the joint meeting of Washington County managers as well as at MPAC. He commented that MPAC had worked hard to attain a compromise and that they would probably object to these changes. He said that staff would express Councilor Scheckla's concern at the lack of responsiveness to local jurisdiction concerns. Councilor Rohlf expressed dissatisfaction with Metro's proposal on the 'big box" issue. He said that Metro should drop this issue since this was a responsibility of the local jurisdiction. After discussion, Mr. Monahan asked for Council direction to write a letter to Metro on the accessory structures and the big box issues. Ms. Smith stated that she has not noted any additional new issues; the issues discussed in the past were still issues in this document. The Council agreed by consensus to direct staff to write a letter on the additional issues. > Interfaith Outreach and the Severe Weather Shelter: Mr. Monahan reviewed the history of the severe weather policy established by the Council in 1994 that was implemented by Interfaith Outreach Services (IOS) For two years, IOS managed a severe weather shelter in the Water Building to provide temporary accommodations for the homeless. He noted management problems that resulted in Interfaith Outreach's decision to reexamine its role as the provider of this service. Mr. Monahan said that he suggested to Interfaith that in November and January they use the water building for the shelter, and in December and February they use the building the City was letting them use for offices. He reported that he received a letter from Kim Brown stating that IOS was concentrating its efforts on the CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 1996 - PAGE 2 0 capital campaign and land use and funding problems for the RITE Center. The Board decided that they will be unable to operate the severe weather shelter this year. Mr. Monahan stated that the City still had a policy of having a shelter; however, he did not know of any other agency interested in operating the shelter, particularly on such short notice. He noted that the water building and the senior center were potential shelter sites. Councilor Hunt stated that he thought there was room for a shelter at the City-owned building where IOS had offices. Mr. Monahan concurred but said that it wasn't an issue of space or security, but rather IOS' concentration on getting the RITE Center up and running. Councilor Scheckla asked if Interfaith's operations overlapped with Neighborshare. Mr. Monahan explained Interfaith's program included job counseling, crisis management and temporary shelter. He said 1 that Ms. Brown said that Interfaith may be able to operate a severe weather shelter on a case-by-case basis at the Methodist Church as they did last year. Councilor Rohlf noted that the City funded both Interfaith and Neighborshare. He commented that if both were available, they served a larger public. Councilor Hunt pointed out that Interfaith and Neighborshare had two different goals. Interfaith's goal was to train people and help them to take care of themselves. Neighborshare might simply take care of immediate needs. _ 1 Mr. Manahan coated that the severe weather shelter didn't rA�" ' fit into Interfaith's philosophy of providing a full range of services to families and homeless people in need. He said that last year Interfaith found that the clientele at the severe weather shelter had changed; it was no longer families but the day laborers who preferred to live in the woods. Councilor Hunt commented that he had suggested moving Interfaith tinto the city office building because he thought there was an understanding during budget discussions that it could also be used for the severe weather shelter. Mr. Monahan said that he thought Interfaith said they would consider doing so, but they had not yet decided on whether or not they would run the shelter this year. Councilor Scheckla commented that he thought the amount of money and effort going into the RITE Center was a high price to pay for only 30 beds. He noted the need of the homeless for more immediate help than was available. Councilor Hunt referenced the failed attempt two years ago to build a homeless facility for southeastern Washington County. In response to a question from Councilor Moore, Mr. Monahan stated that none of the surrounding communities had temporary shelters. He said Ms. Brown indicated that Beaverton had discussed with IOS the possibility of providing land, but IOS wanted to remain at their base in Tigard. Councilor Moore commented that Tigard could not support the whole region's homeless; something had to be done outside of Tigard also. Councilor Hunt concurred. Mr. Monahan said that the question before the Council was whether or not they wanted a severe weather shelter, and if so, how would they do it. He said that he did not think using volunteers was a good idea; it was better to use professional trained staff to deal with this situation and clientele. He said that he did not promote using the Senior Center facility for a temporary shelter. Councilor Hunt asked if they could take back part of the building they leased to Interfaith and renovate it for a shelter. Mr. Monahan said that he didn't think they could do that since the City 1 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 1996 - PAGE 3 . • • leased the entire building to them without an understanding that the severe weather shelter would be located there. Councilor Rohlf suggested dropping the program this year. In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Monahan reviewed • the Council's discussions on this issue over the last several months. He noted an additional concern raised by the City's Risk Manager of an airborne pathogen (such as tuberculosis) in a confined space. Councilor Hunt said that he attended an Interfaith meeting 6 to 8 months ago at which Interfaith stated that if they had enough money to operate both the severe weather shelter and their own programs, they would do so; however, their first priority was the homeless center. Councilor Rohlf commented that he has seen this program as the City's support of Interfaith's program. Mr. Monahan said that they wrote the policy for a severe weather shelter primarily because was an operator willing to step forward. Without an operator, the policy fell apart. Councilor Hunt did not agree, referring to the Task Force that initially addressed this issue on an area-wide basis. Councilor Rohlf commented that his concern that children were being locked out was alleviated by knowing that the severe-weather clientele did not consist of children. The Council agreed by consensus to drop the severe weather shelter program until such time as Interfaith would support it again. A v��� o...a:.. . -�.e.a 4f '4'. r4 ry w”l A rnnai riPr a rvrnitagt to operate 1 the shelter from another responsible organization. The Council indicated yes, although they expressed concerns at using the Water rl Building. Any organization operating such a shelter would also need to cover liability coverage. Mr. Monahan announced an invitation from Jack Reardon to attend a meeting at the Summit Conference Room at Washington Square tomorrow to discuss Washington Square's donation of property for the Greenburg/Maple Leaf improvements. He said that he, the Mayor, and Gus Duenas were planning to attend. • Councilor Rohlf noted typographical errors on Page 26 of the Final Order for Hillshire Hollow. • Council President Hunt adjourned the study session at 6:27 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING • Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board Council President Paul Hunt called the business meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. • Council Communications/Liaison Reports: None " • Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items Public Works Director Ed Wegner presented to Jeff Munroe, Senior Utility Worker, Grounds Division, an award to the City from the Oregon Parks and Recreation Association in recognition of outstanding maintenance and operations for flood damage repair work at Cook Park. He congratulated Mr. Munroe on a job well done. Mr. Munroe expressed his thanks to Mr. Wegner and to the City departments and citizen volunteers who participated in the clean up effort. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 22, 1996 - PAGE 4 • • WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC, TRANSMITTAL ENGINEERING ♦ SURVEYING • PLANNING Phone: 503 684-0652 Fax: 503 624-0157 Date: December 17, 1996 Project No.: 1045-OIH To: Will DeAndrea Project Name: Farmers Insurance CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 From: Len Schelsky/tp Re: Recorded deeds for property line adjustment No. of Copies Dated Description Deeds Comments: The enclosed copies are those deeds that were recorded for all the property line adjustments. Six parcels. If you have any questions,please call. Len Fax ❑ No.of Pages(including cover) 32 Fax No. Mail • Messenger❑ Overnight ❑ Hand Delivery ❑ Pacific Corporate Center, 15115 S.W.Sequoia Parkway,Suite 150,Tigard,Oregon 97224 - - - .. • - - sawn l 4-Alta • • • Parcel 3 Legal Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section I,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600, recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission,April20, 1981, said point a'so being on the northerly right-of-way of S,W, 68th Parkway; thence along the northerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway North 87°28'24" West,278.72 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 388.26 feet, a central angle of 27°22'26", a long chord of North 73°47'09" West, 183.74 feet, an arc length of 185.50 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way, along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 119.93 feet, a central angle of 16°57'37", a long chord of North 51°37'07"West, 35.37 feet, an arc length of 35.50 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way North 46°48'37"East 49.79 feet; thence North 30°38'50"East, 19.22 feet; thence North 55°43'57" West, 8,02 feet; thence North 30°38'50"East,28.54 feet; thence South 56°26'33"East, 18.32 feet; thence North 31°4,5'49"East,60.69 feet; thence along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 161.00 feet,a central angle of 32°26'44", a long chord of South 71°06'25" East, 89.96 feet, an arc length of 91.17 feet; • EXHIBIT "A" 4,1 Pane 1 of 2 10• Li/ •LG 1L.1J i 1 / J1141 rrJ 1 Vr.1 /1b0ll 1111.6 11111 • _ . • • . _ _ _ thence South 87°19'47"East, 127.11 feet; thence North 01°35'20"East,60.23 feet; thence South 89°04'02"East,39.08 feet; thence North 01°19'35"East, 50.73 feet thence South 88°46'21"East, 133.19 feet to the west line of the aforementioned City of Tigard tract; thence along said west line South 01 011'39"West,279.14 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2.06 acres or 89,791 square feet. • • • 11. 1J' JJ ll•C. 11.11 f:1.1 1 .IVV i.o.V 1 Vbl 11bUA 111Ld 1iLl{!jL t STATE OF OREGON 1 1 SS .County of Washington J t I.Jerry : - f QM'.1.• of Aseesa- f r n ••County— • - - - clerk men for . .`:i7•'''':%1,04.•=7..••/i�`�' .rt+ty that k the well..Adt g : • -cawed t and . t$a•:f'il ie .`I�'`�I •f said county.• * s f 0 •Irector of ' s .non,Ex- : ...• - ■ lark Doc : 96102254 Rect: 175478 795.00 11/14/1996 03: 44:01pm ' - 7k. L-s.: it -, ri-. t- ' X"' rf .. '-, s• r a ... t— 6 . ZS •8 After Recording return to: Until a change is requested all tax statements M _ shall be sent to the following address: Terry C. i auck Gertiing/Fcilen Development Company 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue 4650 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 220 Suite 1700 Pacwest Center Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED CC F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to Gerding Investment Company,an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percer.t(50%) interest and p Northwest Real Estate Advisors, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided fifty percent ., (50%) interest, all as Tenants-in-Cormon, Grantee, the following described real property: Ln The real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. O The true consideration for this conveyance is S741,658-58. This deed gives effect to lot t line adjustments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon, case file numbers MIS 96-0011, MIS 96- CE 0019 and MIS 96-0025. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Executed this t t ttlday of November, 1996. F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation WASHINGTON COUNTY RE::PROPI.RTY TPANSFC-R/ TAX •y: $ it•D0 !f'/7• f� .ce res dtnr Itvi PAID DATE 1_ Its: Vice-P esident (Notaries contained on following page) PARCEL 2 1 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE. DEED OTOZZ9N101NafTCH/1316d3.1) t: 44. !T. :. f 1 11-1 �"•i.' N .2 `_ er i !tt:' ""ii f 7 v 1J JV •Lr. 11 L. i.1J 1 •J aoV .V�= ♦L'Vl1 lj .L.L. tirJ Vjy - --- SUlt-Or CAUFORNIX ) ss. COUnty Of_Lie t U 1e s ) On November 11 1996 before me, Grace D. Lumibao personally Gerald A. Dulek _ and Laezlo G. Heredy , authorized representatives sen Com a California corporation, personally known to represesttatives of F.I.G. Holding p�y� me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons actin, executed the instrument. (L)-- • Ltt.AA,\A-,7 c>aACZ:fl.tl � =;/!�''� can*+�+�+tom ' NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA D12, 1999 `.�,� � to.+wOM� tiort2.t09Q My Commission Expires: • rvty Comm.�� 2 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED �/ p7nrs4,1at1urrcwistsos.p :' a (s •� �. ..v a tea• a 1 V ��� la V/a a aL.a.. .yJ V1 V thence North 01°26'21"East,60.00 feet; thence North 88°36'39"West,78.86 feet; thence North 68°20'15"West, 12.00 feet; thence North 21°39'45"East, 105.41 feet to the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along said right-of-way along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left with a central angle of 19°24'40",a radius of 516.22 feet,a long chord of South 77°46'04"East, 174.05 feet, an arc length of 174.89 feet; thence continuing along sai3 right-of-way South 87°28'24"East,279,60 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2.12 acres or 92,499 square feet. EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 d y 4 & y V,V 44 .....y . 4,-,,i j w • ST-AT QF ONFQ �' -.. ----- County of Weighing/shinflt. } ` �r3t��8�rry , n SS•Clerk t � { `� �R the wit•. i;,Ti's••. .• 3.• �Ae coon ., }7i;,:.VN o C � ?4 :t� ; i` P' Ile. rlr that • ..::: .1... ,4,40,,„2,0 * 0, said J` .•�s . Dec • 1. ` rh • ►/rector Re`t, 9 02153,#,- lark e4„,! 03:44;00AW 1830. 00 X. . rte' c''. .. . ...-. a • •.i 1 ♦1 .... c. .i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) - -----.-� - -- — - - ) ss. County of�,QLttnEgles ) Grace D. Lumibao personally On November 11, 1996before me, authorized ed appeared Gerald A, Dulek and Laszlo G. Hexed-� a a California corporation, personally known to nprescntatives of F.I.O. Holding Company, me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. �., GRACE 0. ♦ WASAO k_cMA NOTARY PUBLIC=CAeIL2,_1999 •+c,;. 'My Comm.ECM Nw 12.1994 y /� pll]229111Q214V1'C1{Jt115�.1) 2 - STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED / Parcel 1 Legal Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600, recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission,April 20, 1981,said point also being on the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract, South 0I°11'39" West, 4.10 feet; thence continuing along said west line South 15°40'08" West, 76.53 feet; thence South 77°12'09"West, 95.77 feet; thence South 01°16'19" West,25.00 feet to the centerline of Varns Street(vacated); thence along said centerline South 88°43'41"East. 115.29 feet; thence South 07°54'41"West,228.94 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing South 07°54'41" West, I58 06; thence North 88°54'48"West, 144.10 feet; thence South 00°00'00"East, 10.29 feet; thence North 89°01'25"West, 146.05 feet; thence North 69°16'44" West, 196.93 feet; thence North 30°39'10" West, 156.10 feet; • EXHIBIT "A" /j� Page 1 of 2 MJ v.a • , • thence North 05°45'39"East, 127.05 feet; thence North 32°51'35" West,249.22 feet; thence along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 70.00 feet,a central angle of 42°55'31",a long chord of North 46°41'42"East, 51.22 feet,an arc length of 52.44 feet; thence North 68°09'27"East, 135.52 feet to the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along said right-of-way along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 50.22 feet, a central angle of 09°17'23", a long chord of South 56°09'46"East, 8.13 feet,an arc length of 8.14 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way South 60°48'28"East, 58,26 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 516.22 feet, a central angle of 07°15'16", a long chord of South 64°26'06" East, 65.32 feet,an arc length of 65.36 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way South 21°39'45" West, 105.41 feet; thence South 68°20'15"East, 12.00 feet; thence South 88°36'39"East,78.86 feet; thence South 01°26'21" West,60.00 feet; thence South 88°36'39"East, 130.03 feet; thence South 01°23'21"West, 59.00 feet; thence South 88°36'39"East, 101.22 feet; thence South OI°22'45"West, 17.13 feet; thence South 17°58'28"East,79.72; thence South 01°23'2I" West, 80.64 feet; thence South 89°58'00"East, 116.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 5.09 acres or 221,597 square feet. . EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 • • . ..v 1 1.1. A A•1 g A.aa A .IV•s .J AJ.1 11'VA 111a.C. hadyLf l STATE OF OREGON • :: SS ..- County of Washington I,Jerry : �!M1" -• • or Assess- _ -- -- -- — meat Bnri • '.•n.�••� • o County - - —' -- Clerk for •� 'IF T rt+N that e the with', •,, ••.,`�;,: kw •f said and re• ce'F,. •i�:)• •b county. k 3i�rov! .- 0i tractor of "Alva 7• ttan,Ex- lerk Doc : 96102252 Rect: 175478 1589. 00 11/14/1996 03: 44:OOpm • t 1 1 I. k r F t is i. 1 • i i is . :a u u., 14... AA.tu : as i_uu .� �u�i ���vct liras. 41UC4• • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Ls. County of Los An else ) November 11 1996 before me, Grace D. Lumibao personally authorized • Gerald A. Dulek and Laszlo G. Hered +y )mown a ` Com a California corporation, personall to representatives of P.I.G. Holding Company, me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and aclrnowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the pe.sons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. "'• GRACf D.T � =L Camdaionil�JSb6 a . • ,NO p'�`_ NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA Angdos Cots*• �F•��OfCorm 1094 My Commission Expires: _November 12. 1999 •• • • • • • 2 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 3 07/3229V10214stroU131506.1) • if...;1014: ;,•."*'- W,1 UiJ I LEGAL xESCRi I'ION OF REAL PROPERTY • • Northwest Quadrant A tract of land situated in the S.E. 1/4 6f Section 1,T.2 S.,R 1 W., W.M., being a portion of"YARNS ACRES"recorded in Book 9 of Records of Plats,Page 3, Washington County Plat Records, Washington County, Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point oa the north linelof said"VARNS ACRES"at the westerly right-of- way line of "S.W. 68th Parkway",atilt 5/8" iron rod set in Survey No. P.S. 20,144, Washingtoh County Survey Records; thence, along the westerly right-of-w y line of S.W. 68th Parkway,South 02°37'47" West, 393.27 feet to the beginning point of a 50.22 foot radius curve to the left; thence, along the arc of said curve to-the left having a central angle of l8°36'06', the long chord bearing South 06°40'16";East, 16.23 feet,an arc length of 16.30 feet; thence,Ieaving said right-of-way lin ,South.63°09'2T'West, 129.19 feet to the beainnirg point of a 100.00 foot radius curve to the Icft; thence,along the arc of said curve to the left having a central angle of 27°38'02", the 1 long chord bearing South 54°20'26"West, 47.76 feet,as arc length of 48.23 feet; thence,North 26°29'23"West,249147 feet; thence,North 37°50'27"West, 10151 feet; thence,South 58°50'19" West,42.98 feet; EXHIBIT `A" A. J )V 11.L. 11.,...1 faA 1 ay.,) rr' +J.1 114..U1t 1111.6 ✓j(iULJ STATL OREGON SS .. ' i County of Washington of Aaaeea • ment any , 1• + to County• . Clerk for _ rtify that 4 _ -- thowith:rt4 #tr . ./.` •''•• received - --- — =" - and r.ctrded 'Y• � •o# -of sald countr,t .k ! ;t �: ' ■/ 'A yRlip ••tractor of w eMt11rt , mutton,Ex- . s Jerk Doc : 96102251 Rect: 175478 58. 00 11/14/1996 03: 44: 00pnt -� 1✓r LV A*. 11.rV I.L 1 VVJ rV . 1 h 11LVf� l�ai.a. 02,42_ A fter Recording return to: Until a change Ls requested all tax statements - - - (`(� shall be sent to the following addrtsa: d" F.I.G. Holding Company 4680 Wilshire Boulevard NO CHANGE Los gees, a n or a 010 Attn: Real Estate Investments STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED F.I.G. HOLDING COMPANY, a California corporation, Grantor, conveys to F.I.G. HOLDING COMPANY, Grantee, the following described nal property: The real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 1� The tnie consideration for this conveyance is SO Dollars. The purpose of this deed is 2` to give effect to certain lot line adjustments pursuant to City of Tigard, Oregon case file lln numbers MIS 96-0011, MIS 96-0019 and MIS 96-0025. 913 as -2 THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY § DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE ci= LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. Executed this 11 trday of November, 1996. GRANTOR: F.I.G. HOLDING COMPANY, a California corporation } -= Vice—President By: Its: Vice-President (Notary contained on following page) 1 - STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 02 (17/32298/10214V'IRUI31a19.I) 11' 14' " 14r. it.LL r:1.t .1 JUJ (L■ O 10 '1 1 ll,Uri t 111-r. kQI UZ9 . • ' - , , STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) _ - —- — - -- ^-.-- - - ) ss. County of ^Los Angeles ) Ort November 11 1996 before me, . Grace D. Lumibao , personally and Laszlo G. lie rod , authorized appeared Gerald A. Dulek y known to representatives Holding Company, a California corporation, p 'o me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument� that atheir knowledge to me that they executed the same in their authorized behalf 'which the persons acted, executed on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon the instrument. —„� atu NOTARY PUBLIC FOR CALIFORNIA � _ cLOSMO Ott Cali* My Commission Expires: _November 12, 1999 of C 12.19" 2 — STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED t17n ,1pZlsirrntrlst.N.t) ,. . L L WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC. ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING Phones 503 684-0652 Ctrding Fax; 503 624.0157 Project No.: 1045-01H-96 , November 4, 1996 Revised November 5, 1996 Legal Description • A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South, Range 1 Wren, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600,recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission,April 20, 1981,said point also being on the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract,South 0I°11'39"West,4.10 feet; thence continuing along said west line South 15°40'08"West, 76.53 feet; thence South 77°12'09"West,95.77 feet; thence South 01°16'19"West,25.00 feet to the centerline of Varnes Street(vacated); thence along said centerline South 88°43'41" East, 115.29 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence South 07°54'41" West,387.00 feet; thence North 88°54'48"West, 144.10 feet; thence South 00°00'00"East, 10.29 feet; thence North 89°01'25"West, 146.05 feet; thence North 69°16'44"West, 196.93 feet;; thence North 30°39'10"West, 156.10 feet; thence North 05°45'39"East, 127.05 feet;. thence North 32°51'35"West,249.22 feet; SIB 'A" �1f Pacific Corporate Center, 15115 S.W.Squaw Parkway.Suite 150,Tigard,Oregon 97224 X A _ 'YdVJ1 I Page 2of3 Property Description Project No.: 1045-01H-96 thence along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 70.00 feet,a central angle of 42°55'31",a long chord of North 46°41'42"East, 51.22 feet,an arc length of 52.44 feet; thence North 68°09'27"East, 135.52 feet to the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along said right-of-way along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 50.22 feet,a central angle of 35°32'46",a long chord of North 33°44'42"West,30.66 feet,an arc length of 31.16 feet; thence South 68°09'27"Wcst, 129.19 feet; • thence along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet,a central angle of 27°38'02",a long chord of South 54°20'26"West,47.76 feet, an arc length of 48.23 feet; thence North 26°29'23" West,249.47 feet; thence North 37°50'27" West, 101.51 feet; thence South 58°50'19"West,42.98 feet; thence South 31°09'41"East, 17.86 feet; thence South 58°50'19"West, 156.91 feet to a point on the northeasterly right-of-way of State Highway 217; thence along said right-of-way South 31°06'53"East, 74.34 feet; thence South 26°16'20"East 248.92 feet; then.: South 33°19'28" East,77.38 feet; thence South 88°43'41"East, 111.00 feet; thence South 02°34'34"Wcst, 162.27 feet; thence South 31°32'53"East,229.96 feet to a point of spiral curvature; thence southeasterly along said spiral curve to the intersection of the westerly right-of-way limits of Interstate Highway 5; thence leaving aforementioned northeasterly right-of-way limits of State Highway 217 along the westerly right-of-way limits of Interstate Highwsy5 North 22°01'53"East, 533.55 feet; thence North 05°03'44"East, 300.67 feet; thence North 01°14'53"East,89.06 feet; EQ3IBTT 'A' Page 2 of 3 ti R 11 lay ov 14a 11:4Z teln 1 0Ud LLO i 041 11LUK 111Lt, 4J U32 • • --_ — — -Page 3 of Property Description Prolect No.: 1045-01H-96 t h e n c e North 20°25'16"E a s t, feet, thence leaving afoementioned right-of-way limits along the south right-of-way of S.W. 66th Avenue identical with the centerline of Varnes Street(vacated)North 88°43'41" West, 53.08 feet to the true point and place of beginning; Containing 8.86 acres or 385,762 square feet. 1 1 1 mansri fi } Page 3 of 3 III 6P .: �: � . . JkN 07 '97 02:05PM RED- 'N 1 R/W M/ P.2i5 Oregon January 7, 1997 vifL, . 51)1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City of Tigard. Planning & Zoning REG 1 PORTLAND 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PROPERTY Tigard, OR 97223 MANAGEMENT FILE CODE. RE: Zoning Conformance FILE: 19884 • The Oregon Dept. of Transportation is in the process of preparing a parcel of land for sale. In accordance with State rules and regulations we need a current written zoning conformance. Attached please find a map of the area outlined in black. Also enclosed is a form requesting written conformation and a description of the property. Please send your written conformance to: Oregon Dept. of Transportation R/W Property Management Linda R. Beveridge 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 OR Fax to: Linda R. Beveridge R/W Property Management 731-8458 c. 440 • Sincerely,, .. ,, da R. Beveridge Property Office Specialist wienc_ Jo3v,A.Kitrhiba Gmernor f'"!• `I 1., 123 NW Flanders Portland OR 9720Q-403- (503) 731-8449 7'4-1962()/w,) FAX (503) 731-8458 JAN 07 '97 02.05PM RE(=T'')N 1 R/W P.3/5 'Deptv' dogo' STATEMENT OF CONFORMANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SALE OF STATE-OWNED LAND 19884 N.Tigard Int.-Morwood Rd. Pacific Highway The State of Oregon, Department of Transportation has declared subject land surplus to their needs. A map and description of the parcel is attached, in accordance with ORS 92.016, ORS 92.018 and applicable City or County regulations, the State is inquiring about land division status from the (City/County) of City of Tigard in preparation for sale of property. 1. D This lot was created by a legally approved partition or subdivision and meets the zoning code requirements. 2. E This lot was legally divided by an acquisition of right of way for a state highway and may be sold as a legal lot (ORS 92.010) 3. Does not meet current zoning code requirements but has "grandfather rights" as an individual piece of property and may be sold as such. 4 This lot may be lawfulty sold only via a lot line adjustment. 5. 7 Does not meet local requirements and needs: a. ❑ Variances (list) b. ❑ Partitioning 6. ❑ Does not meet local requirements for the following reason(s): Existing zoning: d� Additional comments: 4 5, Ft/(7 �'F �TG.�✓�� /4, t,e r' C-4.b`,e i ['0iU57/72.)--re 5 7k/C 7r//;..f 1 bt.w. / (( '5 )5 ) r..G," ,`c^�/l/� C 4 kt l4) `e- (`P IF 17- A/fin ' ACT =T m tist he�4c A 7,4 cc .*�E ;4c�;�E,c , ;,mac.,-+FMS p�'�P.�";y, / SIGNATURE TITLE bATE 734.2074(3-9$) • JAN 07 '97 02:05PM REc' )N 1 R44 .. -SF 'FE . i 0; r xr_ I:' j.;NSU.. lr` �1�.'. " . P.4!5 WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS INC_ NGUNEERING • SURVEYING • FL NNING Phonc: 303 b64-0652 Fax: 5C3 624-0157 Gerding Project No.: 1045-011-1-96 November 7. 1996 Exhibit•B" Property Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian. City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600, recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transpotration Commission,April 20, 1981, said point also being on the southerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract the following courses. South 01°11'39" West. 4.10: thence South 15°40'08" West, 76.53 feet; thence South 7712'09"West, 95.77 fee thence South 01°16'19" West, 25.00 feet to a point on the centerline of S.W. Varnes Street(vacated); thence leaving the herein before describrd West line along said centerline of S.W. Varnes Street (vacated) Souh 88°43'41"East, 11529 feet; thence leaving said centerline North 01°15'29"West, 126.55 fee:to the true point of beginning; Containing 5,240 square feet, more or less. MAJ:1 117/96 p/o4SO1 idoc/i j'`r . JAN 07 '97 02:06F'M RErN 1 R/14 P.5/5 • 1:: • ' V7— r"-96 FP.I 11 : 05 •.v. W. ii:E CONELTAN7S Ft-.X NO. 3 624 0151 . . • . • • .• _ . e• • • . . . ' : • . ,.. ••■•. • •0 '.1- • . . . : , • il,• .01.1 - • . . . . : ..... ; .•i• „. Til ..•.. r ..._. 1.1,.1. 1. . Id... :".. ... •-. .. 1 • ... ..... .1, 4 ." I....;'. • .._ . .,.. ...., r` L.. ,.., 7 N . . .... i ..- • •-• ...... ::: 1" = 5',...": ......_______ ..................•".._........... :.., ...... ., - ..., :.: SW. &Nil 4DARKwty .... •••• ..... ... ,...,... •• ...... ..... -, .--.... ...,. . . , • ..:r• 5 111'39. Vi — 4.10' ‘....• ....... : : . : .. . — • • . . 0 in • :: •., ..:. ... 0 ; '. ....• PO ■.1 f ; .--• • • C 77n2lri, , _ ..... * s g5•i' ......^ —..............____.........-. —. i't ,.......... AREA = 5.240 S.F. •,... .„ ,,:,.....,,.., i ..... : • r- tv 115.29. : col S 884341' E 5.W VARN 5 STi : .-- • ! tn : . I . I ' . . . . EXHIBIT " B " . . 7'z.:..,;,::::::, i 1 ''.4'."-:Z.::■;•..% C:7. , . . • . . . : i --..c_...._ AT wysb C:NLAWN eiT 11 WESTLAICE rtAI. 1 I coistruA?ris nic. t11Pifr.r:-.+' 1...T .......--•■.. , JAN 07 '97 02:05PM REr'''N 1 R/W P. 1/5 FAX DATA SHEET TO: ri.Vt_Ot TCAAOL DATE: 1.7.q7 TIME: 2 U LOCATION: # PAGES (incl. cover page) FAX # Cow " 721crI SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: [ 1 Confidential [ ] Urgent FROM: Li Nk. &/er\ lease reply ( [ ] For your information LOCATION: Region 1 Right of Way MESSAGE: 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209 FAX# 731 -8458 If not received correctly, please call: Sent by: GROUP MACKENZIE 5032281285; 03/20/97 11 :14; ,etraX #408;Page 1 /3 • GROUP -177ACKENZIE1 0890 SW BANCROFT STREET/PO BOX 69039•PORTLAND,OR 97201 TEL;503 224-9570•NET:GRPAAACK.COM•FAX:503.228.1285 FAX COVER SHEET Date: 3 1 2O 117 Project Number. . ?.76° 7 . . Company: Q,t r`t or- `1 (5Nrt—> FAX: . . . G 4. 7. .. ... . . . . . .. Attention: w :LL 6 tv D 1$-A Project Name: i�kaK `.-L gam: L Le-c-.si�. Description: From: . .S A.1 i e� Comments or Special Instructions: . . l e s,Z.�l7. . . ti�.. 2�w;-.7 s %� . . . A-CC 0 ^^^�o�A.-ti t, . , , . ./-�-L. . . f::;1-•,44"-.4.1.5. ' e v r s.Z- ^me. s..4..3e- (Lc_. ^ `ma c S. ... . . . . .?.t.4.-`F S 6- Ev - Y.?). . . . 1Zts.Pen.d. . . . . ,sS«>!l. . . . 0-.0 'Pass t 61 . c: by FAX to: FAX: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES(including this cover sheet): 3. . . . . . . If you did not receive all pages,please call our Records Department. ORIGINAL WIL 41111VW FOLLOW BY MAIL. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this facsimile transmission is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,this serves as notification that any reading, disclosure,copying,distribution,or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If this transmission was in error,immediately notify us at 50322`9570 to arrange for return of the original facsimile. Internal Use On File�_ Sender WP Department Sent by: GROUP MACKENZIE 5032281285; 03/20/97 11 :15; jeffix #406;Page 2/3 03/19 17:39 1997 FROM: TO: 5032281, PAGE: 1 r1AR 19 '97 18:00 P.1 WILLIAM L. OWEN & ASSOCIATES TAUS AND LANDSCAPE CONSULTNQ S MMC14 P.O. Box 841, Portland, Oregon 97207 (503)222-7007/QLl•Mbz• ?bep-Al gg 164) FAX(503)656-3219 TRANSMITTAIJFIELD MEMO CifeiP p TO A) K 7' lltIi- GROLVJEkegfPiz-LIE --- ...0,=====......., From: let L, [� Date: , 1 Iti q 7 Project fit: -_.___e--Kcitiy i 'i.-`?f- Our job 0: Subject: b i — % _ . r ''" • 1140 I. • • f Tei*Cf) Atz ,--4 C C...4 e_51 0 i 2• 611-1"-L 4p1---_, 6 f0 ' ?/D t, e TRH g.6 S) "IfigKi Cu e_715 61-- I pis' NA.r 7Rte- I W 4 amp L.A • A" P U) .. _ ff. - 3 -.4 Li,Ce.4) 79441 - glo • - %- . - ) �,►V l '. U� 'L7' AEI s -r �i� 1 i{ 1 I I* LO W i I C_iL_ _) .OA—T S Nte447#04a0i9 'Fa ,/ ffrowir-usgiEr4J r i 1 €_, A 91 e.L, re- ---its- di TO , Copy to -- J ca cL Co 0 at i --OW CO1ICi1r K _____ 0 - _._.r_..---�—CON — — U, EXIST AC o PAVEM N r 0 N 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 S.W. 68th P RKWAY co PAV Ac 0i N +2' 37' 47" EAVEraEnrT Co - 45' _ _ _"Alilimmainimisitiitarsar 0 CO CV m it 77��" w J• �, 117111 ,0111111r.‘10. • 6- : 00 N so �� 30' LM - ,in i 0 AkNO iliv_. _R 5:0_,' _ _ _ .IOW („ :25.0' 0 v. 0 i n 61 31' 32' 24' IV .‘ 0 0 ' . 1 0 - ' OP . all 1 0 Mir 1 a Se R3.0° 3. R5.0' - - 0 • • 28.5' 16' 16' 24' 16' 24 16 c \ F+ ���i�� or�r��� co \ ' e F WA .K 0 10 • -I' (7.. To XS& Sn Gh r1 1 I GROUP IMACKENZIE 0690 SW Bancroff Street / PO Box 69039 • Porttand.OR 97201 Tel:503.224.9560•Net:info @grpmack.com•Fox:503.228.1285 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION PROJECT NAME: Tigard Triangle Corp. Park DATE OF CALL: 10/20/97 PROJECT#: 296500 TIME: 1:50 p.m. PERSON: Will D'Andrea PHONE#: 639-4171 COMPANY: City of Tigard SUBJECT DriytLo pmoT RE`t GV TItrtE l , IIT REMARKS: Group Mackenzie asked Will D'Andrea to confirm the time limits on three Development Review approvals for the south site. The following items were noted: 1. SDR 96-19 (2-story, 50,000 SF offices): 10/16/99 2. SDR 96-22 (Hotel plus 84,500 SF office): 8/26/98 3. SDR 96-23 (Hotel plus 84,500 SF office): 8/26/98 Minor modifications to SDR 96-22 (4-story, 82,000 SF and 72,000 SF offices) approved on 7/10/97 also have a time line to 8/26/98. Will indicated that the time limit means that we need, at a minimum, to obtain Building Permits for buildings. Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five(5) days of receipt. I$. ?A.O LAO. t.)- / L co tJs-c )C---K-t©tJ cuni yama TF/kc c: Will D'Andrea- City of Tigard Mark Edlen- Gerding/Edlen Development Company Rick Saito, Peter Alto - Group Mackenzie K\WPDATA\97-10\96500\20RTC 1.KC 10/27/97 11:16 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0001 *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 5490 CONNECTION TEL 5032281285 CONNECTION ID START TIME 10/27 11:15 USAGE TIME 00'55 PAGES 2 RESULT OK (7.4 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile Tod -7-AAA 10 __ v � 0/74-A474 Company: (.1-ROO Phone: Fax: ZZ-2 S 5- From: V L / 1 Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: /0 - 2_7 Pages including this page: COMMENTS: January 16, 1998 ti I �\ • y- AA CITY OF TIGARD Jeff S. Holdorf, Assistant Closing Administrator OREGON Commercial Real Estate Closing Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company Des Moines, IA 50392-0001 RE: Loan Application No. D-751765 Dear Mr. Holdorf: This letter is in response to your request that Tigard Triangle I, L.L.C. provide evidence of zoning compliance in connection with the above referenced mortgage loan application. The two "Class A" office buildings located at 13010 SW 68th Parkway and 13190 SW 68th Parkway in the Tigard Triangle Corporate Park which is in Tigard, Oregon are within the City of Tigard's zoning district jurisdiction. The zoning classification is Mixed Use Employment (MUE). It appears that the improvements to the property, and occupancy and use of such are in compliance with the approved Site Development Review (SDR) 96-0019. All permits and approvals necessary for the construction, occupancy and use of the property have been issued and are in full force and effect. Based on the authority vested in me by the City of Tigard, Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and its successors and/or assigns may rely on the information provided in this letter. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, / , 1U/i/i'/JAI9 William D'Andrea, Associate Planner Community Development Department I:\C U R P L MW I LL\HO LDO R F.LTR c: Teri A. Harrod, Chief Financial Officer, Gerding/Edlen Development Co. SDR 96-0019 Land Use File 1998 Director's Interpretations File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 GERDING/EDLEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CONSULTING & DEVELOPMENT 4650 SW Macadam Avenue Suite 220 • Portland, Oregon 97201 • 503.299.6000 • Fax 503.299.6703 RECEIVED PLANNING DEC 01 1997 CITY OF TIGARD November 26, 1997 Will D'Andrea Assistant Planner Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard Endorsement Letter for Tigard Triangle I, LLC Dear Mr. D'Andrea: Enclosed is Tigard Triangle I, LLC's check for$150 in payment of the fee required by the City of Tigard to execute the Endorsement Letter to our lender. I look forward to receiving the Endorsement Letter as soon as possible. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, eri A. Harrod Chief Financial Officer TAH/rj w d'andrea check Enclosure GERDING/EDLEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CONSULTING & DF\ Fl()PMENT 4650 SW Macadam Avenue Suite 220 • Portland, Oregon 97201 • 503.299.6000 • Fax 503.299.6703 November 6, 1997 Will D'Andrea Assistant Planner Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Request for Information by November 12, 1997 Dear Mr. D'Andrea: My client, Tigard Triangle I, LLC, recently completed construction of two class A commercial office buildings in Tigard, Oregon. In connection with obtaining permanent financing for those buildings, the lender would like the City of Tigard to provide a letter which ascertains the properties are in compliance with zoning regulations. Specifically, the letter is to be addressed to Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and its successors and/or assigns and shall specify: • the zoning classification of the property; • that the property lies within the boundaries of the municipal authority's zoning district; • that the individual executing the letter is authorized and empowered to do so on behalf of the municipal authority; • that the current improvements, occupancy and use of the property are in full compliance with all applicable zoning codes; • all governmental permits and approvals necessary for the construction, use, operation and occupancy of the property have been issued and are in full force and effect; and PAD- hq\IF. sso. , ED ENA DoE • Letter to Mr. D'Andrea November 6, 1997 Page 2 • that lender may rely on this letter for funding a loan secured by the property. The properties are located within Triangle Corporate Park and the street addresses are 13010 SW 68th Parkway and 13190 SW 68th Parkway. The legal descriptions are enclosed. Knowing your time is valuable, I have taken the liberty to draft the attached letter which would satisfy our lender's requirements and hopefully meet with your approval. If the letter is to your satisfaction, please execute it on your letterhead and provide me with a copy before November 12, 1997. Please feel free to call me at(503) 299-6000 if you have any questions or comments. I appreciate your efforts related to this matter. Sincerely, 17&/(4—C/ eri A. Harrod Chief Financial Officer TAH/rjw d'andrea_zoningln Enclosures cc: Brian Rager,Development Review Engineer, City of Tigard Peter Alto, Group Mackenzie Kelly Saito, Gerding/Edlen Development (CITY OF TIGARD LETTERHEAD) Jeff S. Holdorf Assistant Closing Administrator Commercial Real Estate Closing Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company Des Moines, IA 50392-0001 Re: Loan Application No. D-751765 Dear Mr. Holdorf: This letter is in response to your request of Tigard Triangle I, LLC to provide evidence of zoning compliance in connection with the above referenced mortgage loan application. The two class A office buildings located at 13010 SW 68th Parkway and 13190 SW 68th Parkway in Tigard Triangle Corporate Park in Tigard, Oregon are within the City of Tigard's zoning district. The zoning classification is Mixed Use Employment. It appears that the improvements of the property and occupancy and use of such are in compliance with all applicable zoning codes, rules and regulations of the City of Tigard. All permits and approvals necessary for the construction, occupancy and use of the property have been issued and are in full force and effect. Based on the authority vested in me by the City of Tigard, Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and its successors and/or assigns may rely on the information in this letter. Sincerely, Will D'Andrea Assistant Planner Community Development Department cc: Teri A. Harrod, CFO Gerding/Edlen Development Company • f�f///y�//^L/�//�uI�I 1, Y�/ AA/Y.\ Lvvv` Parcel 4 Legal Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point in the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600, recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission, April 20, 1981, said point also being on the northerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the west line of said City of Tigard tract, North 01°11'39" East, 279.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence leaving said west line North 88°46'21" West 133.19 feet; thence South 01°19'35" West 50.73 feet; thence North 89°04'02":West 39.08 feet; thence South 01°35'20" West 60.23 feet; thence North 87°19'47" West 127.11 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 161.00 feet, a central angle of 32°26'44", a long chord of North 71°06'25" West, 89.96 feet, an arc length of 91.17 feet; thence South 31°46'49" West, 60.69 feet; thence North 56°26'33" West, 18.32 feet; thence South 30°38'50" West, 28.54 feet; thence South 55°43'57" East, 8.02 feet; thence South 30°38'50" West, 19.22 feet; EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 Ilya / • • thence South 46°48'37" West, 49.79 feet to the northeasterly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along said right-of-way along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 119.93 feet, a central angle of 45°46'08", a long chord of North 20°15'15" West, 93.28 feet, an arc length of 95.80 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way North 02°37'47" East, 332.45 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Irving Street(vacated); thence along said right-of-way of S.W. Irving Street South 88°36'39" East 510.06 feet to the aforementioned west line of the City of Tigard tract; thence along said west line South 01°11'39" West 213.76 feet to the True Point of beginning; Containing 3.55 acres or 154,616 square feet. EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 ll � Parcel 3 Legal Description A tract of land situate in the southeast quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of that tract relinquished to the City of Tigard by Resolution No. 600, recorded in the Minutes and Records of the Oregon Transportation Commission, April 20, 1981, said point also being on the northerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway; thence along the northerly right-of-way of S.W. 68th Parkway North 87°28'24" West,278.72 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 388.26 feet, a central angle of 27°22'26", a long chord of North 73°47'09" West, 183.74 feet, an arc length of 185.50 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way, along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 119.93 feet, a central angle of 16°57'37", a long chord of North 51°37'07"West, 35.37 feet, an arc length of 35.50 feet; • thence leaving said right-of-way North 46°48'37"East 49.79 feet; thence North 30°38'50"East, 19.22 feet; thence North 55°43'57" West, 8.02 feet; thence North 30°38'50"East, 28.54 feet; thence South 56°26'33" East, 18.32 feet; thence North 31 046'49"East, 60.69 feet; thence along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 161.00 feet, a central angle of 32°26'44", a long chord of South 71°06'25" East, 89.96 feet, an arc length of 91.17 feet; EXHIBIT "A" thence South 87°19'47"East, 127.11 feet; thence North O1°35'20"East, 60.23 feet; thence South 89°04'02" East, 39.08 feet; thence North O1°19'35" East, 50.73 feet thence South 88°46'21" East, 133.19 feet to the west line of the aforementioned City of Tigard tract; thence along said west line South 01°11'39" West, 279.14 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 2.06 acres or 89,791 square feet. • • • • SENDER: 70 ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the N •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. following services(for an w ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): r: card to you. d d •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address .= d permit. `v y ■Write'Retum Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. CI Restricted Delivery V .▪ ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date o delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. a O 01 v 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number w w Kent Cut-Liming P 103 725 754 Cr E Cumming Const. Co. 4b.Service Type o 2565 SW Towle Avenue ❑ Registered ® Certified tr wGresham, OR 97080 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured .E rt ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD a 7.Date of Delivery a —61; 0 cc Z 5.Rec ived By:LPrint Name) 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested c w , and fee is paid) 4 c. g 6.Signat re•.(Add ee orAgen� o X 0 Y. - PS Form 11, December 1994 Domestic Return Receipt H• rt P 103 725 754 F r •• US Postal Service N Receipt for Certified Mail . '° No Insurance Coverage Provided. rt rt Do not use for International Mail(See reverse) (n I-C 'tilt Cumming ^ rr guliglintrii r O. 2565 SW Tow1 P AvPrn1P —� rn P ste State OR 1080 O Q, �res�iam n Postage Q`i•c\-G,40 1�N3Z Prl W Certified Fee 0 °' 35 B tD f,. Special Delivery Fee 0 u1 { LO Restricted Delivery Fee ��" g; Return Receipt Sh ( r O Whom&Date Delivered 1 .n Return Receipt Showing to Whom, < Date,&Addressee's Address 0 —1-1 TOTAL Postage&Fees $ 2, / I C.) Postmark or Date E `o Li_ Co a March 6, 2001 ' � Inspection and Valuation International CITY OF TIGARD 700 South Flower Street, Suite 1520 Los Angeles, California 90017 OREGON To Whom It May Concern: This is a letter in response to your Zoning/Planning and Building Department Information Request. Your original fax with the appropriate responses is also attached, but this letter will give more complete answers to each of the questions. The subject is in a Mixed-Use Employment (MUE) zone. Included with this letter is chapter 18.520 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code. I've highlighted the sections that are pertinent to the MUE zone. Please consult the chapter for specific signage and parking requirements. The Subject, and office building, is currently a permitted use. The subject does not have any material outstanding zoning code violations and it meets the parking space requirements. This office is not aware of any pending material zoning code requirements/regulations that would render the Subject an existing non-conforming use. The subject was built"as of right". In the event of a catastrophic loss, the Subject is welcome to rebuild according to the zoning provisions. There are no municipal required procedures or mandated improvements that are triggered by a change in ownership title. However, should the office building gain new tenants, each tenant must gain a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Tigard. The subject has no material outstanding building code violations within its file. However, there is an existing building and fire/life safety code requirement that is outstanding. On 3/27/00 an application for a tenant improvement was received. A building permit was issued to GE Capital,but correlated electrical permits were not applied for at the same time, and a final inspection was never ordered. As of now, the building permit is expired. This situation needs to be remedied. Because the final inspection was never completed,we can't guarantee that there are no physical conditions that negatively impact the subject. The subject is not within a 100-year frequency flood plain. The State of Oregon 1998 Edition Structural Speciality Code is enforced under the CP—Professional/Administrative Commercial Zoning classification. There is one requirement that is triggered by a change in tenant status within the office building. Each tenant needs to follow the procedures to gain a Certificate of Occupancy. According to our records,the building has two tenants, Colonial Pacific and GE Capital. Colonial Pacific has obtained their Certificate of Occupancy,but GE Capital has not. Until GE Capital receives their Certificate of Occupancy, the building cannot be deemed to be in compliance. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, extension 407. Sincerely, 15L y„.7, Kevin Young Associate Planner SOR% -00019 Sent By: IVI LOS ANGELES; 2138960149; Feb-5-01 2:40PM; Page 1 /2 r,.F „.,,.iT,,,i;�+. c.,,, '„4.pin' 41,,' y'C..i'` 4,El l�y' IA *gt.tw-jr'•.0 r'+�»,,' i,i•y$yn+yl•,.,. .{..OgrwAJ}'��.�.�i'T["7 'P•/firt. """ktliy ••g r 9 ��'" •{G;all,,-rw'','!"4ry*x t-:,'"^7.;•. ,'L ^, 1 1: , M'�`7{'41t4 Sr,'.2/ ,I 1Y 7 'W •xl T° '.i il-I A I.Y'9,Y .� {:y a b y 1,"i t.'N P gll�l r)K 1'L h5. ,.. r,,,,,� 'wf l��•r l }a "k y :._Y,�;, `°, 'lei ,� `fir. �pry� 2 I d: ��,�• rt.. �+r a �4 p., x y•.,Jf>♦ .1 IIN:•1 '�j"� >,_ x' ti !;tit n Y L nt if--A .. ova n.,"r7' �r,�-, j , A" { �,�,.:... , „,',`.... y 4w•r»C .�3".1I�t[y 1,1 .'' .;1:',.•:,,;•1:„,:;,.,�..,k. S f • .M •' ,ty„W$i hY ,•^n+', 1 1 l 4!. 111 ..•1,r -i n1•h 1,i)Y"" w }T N � .7.• �` ."•r,nr?„•pcf �,tiw� 1 N���=�u%. r;x•,i '1`n+ ��j, aw ra„wa`� r f ti ",...;;;;,..4.'"^.1 ti r k S + o' r .e � r� �` t Y- 1 1 '., . r".7f". � ,. ^e.n .w - � Yy, '3 "'< � y '� 6 { Nis.• y, � - ri�"R rr ,��.,• a- �3^''`L1'_„^.l�4' �'•'.. 71 �, •x M,, v .rky+, K.�nl•h7 1� 'w .. ♦ � C)•t 1 S � w.a Z .YU,r. 1 I�•• �- f4x� � K>" .ice "M1..7^ +,"`f ` '4 (� Iw :iM * .i �, "r '� wa�!P' � ' 4'ztf+ ,r.�•er4 u.1t,,t✓ ^� ''^• 6 y„Fµi ry ,r.• , f • 7...� %� p � V�A x.� 1p ,��� }1 ,c6t�' 0.°..17P• r•C`. W n •VW ,i�^ "4, �gr.w.�v31� 1wtw,� ;"f''i �'>:i?:� �t, „� '` f •.H Y �? r r n m" 5, w i x.•rt, , r !✓ w.�,- 'r"o- ,,i.4 .m ,,;: i�kxae .e'a� ` C M .f"1 e. «.i r ,t'.__.._». f t. (' 7 f a 4 ' ( •qt a J . +,rt w a ' a '4�5vG. l $ f `'� L C �,rr', w , la �1•h � cla.ri{ y h,, r• 1 i tt� ,,.�, Ml,y, r• y� +. .f'!.r w•n •. `� �.�v W J F,,+ „,w . "r k G. >,ykP,,n w�� �-.4..„ +Wz ,•t � { •1• T'^.`• uO ^ ()�[!�^A w. ♦ f t� � �a^'r rM�'•f �4 {�y '"•, I f if:..� J - ��T M rgYrr .x4 ''. t ,t1, •'• . } '^ 1�` '$ a a , '.�t 1• •"k , tV. - ^+, ! Nr ,*,Z7 ,•'•....1•sM I �� S-V F4 n •,: Lkti1� ( ,`.r .. �Z Iik,',1,,,:',.,,,13,...,,,.‘f .,i, . 'oi,�}ol!k1 C ey a' t+ . bt k� & L _A�. :1 " �.en >K nv '4a�r; � l ��' 6 4 7'e:•.ix�Y ^*' M• �:?"^°c 1 n: !f:p•2aV' � S+• '•r 1 yr u ti 4 h R!''_4Ew "4�'4111yl, rL _,. µ''I ,�,.7 h,tk. tf o.1 ,: 4 4114 1,i. I.. eh4of '- „d�,„W, 4-`7, + .1 fir.. - �-� •ts"{Anu*e w,r. +? "�• .w r r Y�.�; <r,..�,•'i ,,.q+. � -� r � '�, i 'tir"^.K e., ��,.n `s'r 1d f�.,:, N iiitglitt Mho dr ., , w ; p. r.,,,r .f P„ 1'l . •0.d ,.. ∎;,r{.g,' : h'•,s� (<f;::, `-i.. [ w •••f n r 4 ,:F . 4 y.• n -. ,�1'I,•. "' %1�'Y , • .A: ,., . fx: �� . HEu.' J r. + !`yrr. h : Mn,`•"'." q,J` - •, C � .� •��,�f:+ l ;'C,y �.� c r:,,¢ !•f w N+ 7, r w .x ;1 a?+.�� +..wH.. *Oki, '!t `, P � �x nn�- � tSH� '.,yf�,tl;,U, µNM •�'?Il:,e>r Y�•'P1!'•it+ i.�1�,�Q�„1�4°nr'^��M�)�"11�' j�4 ui4 rf�m ,�,�wrt.� •N.Ri• wT. k.m, ti�i ^.Ky'"`�,4.w.`ar>1t»=■1 '•1 ` • .c ,C l N,f9 $r • , ;f:451iW,�µY•_ i'.• 1F 1 to r Uc �•.."::: h'IL ^���, •'W �+1 t. y I hMh W ` F 1 tl � �mf•m}!M,. 1�C'. t�i� :7'c. „ '.4.F1 ,,+ N� "Mt�J, . �wr:��a�, f• ”a i<1t..t!w,, ,st' 4 ,,�{�:,.°'"ea ia...�Y''.,�.�n:'L'x- ra .Mw.�'v�`..��-; ,.5��•L-�-+,Yl v.:l:l�FT:�.•S�'.'.'..,...'v�:+-+.•ryx f r4 i y w f.v 'r r .-1k f� �yy Nry\ry Mn qtr.'' '.'xl. firs:+ yl i.4/. 't. ,ffi' I v�whaVN "'VIM '1 i :1. 1`,� h I tc''i1,ei MN� S� ,-IWt,M , a KTm",.i` 1 ,4,..�,Y.,'.;V.:..X11 K 1 !!((n .&n. 'AA.-'4 �rr. r `..ln•Jh S1 �1.. .{�t'mrh _p nr . ,NN,> )'1 ..,.r,: f a.aafi,y�:' ,i '4 'M .-mN3:•9E�'Ka, .C!•N' ., : .�•i,`�i,° K-1 ,, e,rr>.�S.-mn,,.a,ow....., Date: February i, 2001 •: > To �wrvnari Casper Subject: Tigard TrNingle I Dept.: Community Development 92,905 SF 3 (2)2—Story Office Buildings ` 13010 S �68th Parkway.• • - W Tel (6031 e39• 171 Tigard, Orgon - Fax No (503):$144860 M Project Mgr: Babak Nalsirpour,R.A. IVI Proj, No V1028313 • IA New York N. Waahin•.'to ...OGc. :.• ,:;.r:: L:ok•An.eke .., . • ',a# Miami . '.• • Dallas• IVI International has been corn mssioned to Conduct a P piprtt•Condition As&esslment Survey on the above referenced Subject. Please respond to the foliowin8 documentationfinforrnallE i l queets: 1, Does the Subject have any material outstendin ing code violations within its file? Yes 0 No 0 If"Yes", please faz copies of same_ 2. Is there any existing of pending Material building or fire/life safety code requirements Yes'No ❑ that the Subject would not be graridfatthered and therefore compliance would then be• mandatory? If"Yes", 'tease.briefly explain. .a , ;r` �,r► 5. 3. Do you have any general or clue kno yn Y g PE owl± eny physical conditions(altlb or • Yes ❑ No building)that negatively impact the Subjeat.suchAtiocalizeo flooding, sanitary sewer back-up problems, etc ? if"Yes", please briefly: Bin, • 4. Is the Subject within a 100 year frequenty frequency flood ? if`Yes°, please identify Yes ❑ NO IN the Flood Hazard Zone•as per FEMA's Flood Instsance Rate Maps. 6. What Building Code Is 9nforced, arid what.ls thellit,al Zoning Ordinance classification of the pro y? ._.5-7-4'7- c —Oi e , 9g: II,-6a;':. 2 GC- cJy'4 C ,SPey,4( 7. / ea e C P-ia(aCslid,/ / 6. Are there any municipal required procedures or mandated lmprov+etbent�s thslt.are tai erect A`A 14„,,,j cst'�Gfl v / $9 by.... . c a change of ownerlshipptitle such as a re.Irrspection by the Building Department,the installation of C clvv1141.e'vle /cc sprinklers, installing water conservation devices,.:;otc? If so, what are they? i r •' •`^'7 •C.IY t 1 t t _k.1.v -Si ■ ,c.. I 7 Please fax us a copy a'the SubJe ,1 r.11r-:ney.- Submitted By 1, f Date: 3 `7 —U/ Thank you for your ass/stance- Shou/c you have any qua s ar be ally:lbei les0ciape 71iA'.pneeding the requested tnformotion,ploaae calf 8abak Nesa/rpour,A.A. 1:1003 pr 1003.2 facilities asseminentgh)tv10285131bullding department foil request aoc x.:• e,Inspection&Valustbn International, Inc. 1999 '``"`? Sent By: IVI LOS ANGELES; 2138960149; Feb-5-01 2:41PM; Page 2/2 t l 1 �. in.,.,.. .`,..,,. <;.t '.h. ,(__'. n,,'l.h '.l' '''V., 4,1 f � fiM� �iS0{y1.111 rM. f j .1 X ".. 1' >. :f l M �,�t ., l i X k• w�.T.i4xS + ,v` {.r'!I. a d,- i8y ` t. qq�� 5.. � h I ifi'i$''•'x , r�.tt$ / i i.t ,f d 8 ..7 ''c '49 �iq'0' "� P ., Ave.,,,..-. t,I* ' 1~0, v4_ MI/ -'1. ' ' R ,M A R. i�.'� r i 1A t��1 t.,*,, `..if �: ti ! l 5 st n a W � Ali' W4'"::+} wn � ss9" h, r � kL't,. f 1 N tl. ,. 6.0 tiW+:`a i• �. n Y I ! u. r [^ L `i i' 4 i 1 V f „,,,#%,,, ,,.4,......1z4;:. V {i piMrN ' •. '•••,'L A..t �Y wd SI �.g 100''' 1,1 �+. ..• ' «, 11. +nt+ "'S,„, ,+ L"1�= i +t gr4 + n ,,w:nn,w n r.. 2;','....17:- e R 11, .:,,I"ti iYf d,l,« n /�Itt, l it I t. >h s, v ,+.. i rw r f"fk f a>vr * ft tf +`"`µ:F.v fi .�{ .>� ' .vlI ` ;S ,4 a jel+(. l r �'n �- .,'+S �:j, I 1 , V.' )� "VF�1)II, ' L y„ *A-Yn�I N r �;.�i6,t° u���v&" 4 +y,:''',,,,,i:`�, � ..,• �l � �1`,f �� i����'�e rl[w'ti - `tC .u,��r� ,.� .fin .'J�`;Tx '' ,-.fit j;,M kr. +�e .3}". � 4 u `,„,41 N lfu'r 4hF ''h"' M• w n. i w Y l � i a•r elr':�, LG, „N r ie. N 7 1�. �, t v p•• -� M t r w, "',•r�l t fr a " v 1y r i 5� $ �"i�� . �w.✓ f � ti ' �1}( -M•�.f ���)F � 't 1 y•r _.. M� n 1/�ry`�yU�J � �,.(k� 5 h CYLfN.�11'`� N -17L'f .,T,. , `T' Inspection & V tin l 1 '' �yE I,.',,„*F,:-......j! t i.. 4°N/' 11 .'4 �� o-y f +4 i w `1 N,S=hNM 9il w ♦^. 4 m } . '' :7i3t1 Sau�r-1$o�uwrr Street,Sutte 15211{ !)k f ,ti. i< kf,1 ..i t/' Loe eta salt t i w,,+ l+,I+,S°'-I� r •' n ;'• '"'N �Kf�L`,i,,1 '✓ +rte 7 i•L__,,,::,.- it1.4)l41 pp(.�([ ((w}}�� R � 7 y! r 4 u,Jc1i!I Date: Februa 5,2001 To: Sherman Casper Subject: Tigard tangle I .::,.. .:::' s- Dept.: Community Development 92,906 • G (2)2-Story Office .1::::.•;...:.::,. Bulidin. = 13010 S 68th Parkway Tel. No.: (583)839-4171 Tigard, • regon Fax No.: (503)698-1960 IVI Project Mgr: Babak :: :sirpour, R.A. M Proj. No.: V1028613 • New York Washington,MC.; „ . <.. .LCktsAtigekte ... I Miami ■ Dallas IVI International has been corn issioned to conduct a Prop....1:1.:..,;'...*.*:COndltion Assessment Survey on the above referenced Subject. Please respond to the following docu ntation/infortnatlon requesteit6tlhe above telephonetfax number 1. Is the Subject within a oning District? If'Yes",.Please Identify ' -X —Liao?,-E i' `Ot�11yC�1 Yes,No D the Zone/District,whe It was adopted and the specific eignage and parking requirements. 2 Is the Subject a aurre permitted use? Yes No❑ 3. Does the Subject have :ny material outstanding zoning code violations within Its file? Yes 0 No If*Yes', please fax co• -s of same. 4. Does the placement, q entity or area of signage Ci'irtipty with current zoning requirements? Yes No D 5. Does the quantity of •: Ing spaces complywIth currant zoning requirements/ YesiNo O 6 Are there any existing pending material zening aide requirementahegult;itions Yes 0 No that the Subject would : considered an existing rioA# reforming use? If"Yes', please briefly :• lain. Ufy., .jh e1 J%! ;.e.,' „ ..(pr,/ -�(^''"4-f v • 7. Was the Subject bunt••s of right*? Yes)XNo 0 If'No"to the above, :1 variances were neceseery?, 8. In the event of a catast •phic loss,could the Subjectbe rebuilt to its current density? Yes f !o D 9. Are there any munici•• required procedures or maturated Improvements that late triggered by a change of ownershl• We such as:new Use Permit or a re-Issuance of Zoning Approval by the $t' Zoning Department or oning Board of Appeals? If so,what are they? Yes 0 No 10. Please fax us a copy o the Subject's Zoning Compliance Certificate, if any. Yes 0 No Submitted = ''�, Date: 3/7k1/ lk you for your assistance 'hould you have any qu a or should them be any fees associated with providing the requested • rmatlon, please call Babak 7 ssirpour, R.A. ©Inspedlon&Valuation Internation I,inc. 1999 I:too3 pr#ilSc*filea\0O3.2 facilities assessment(faa)1v102B5131foil zoning department request.doc