Loading...
SDR1996-00014 SDR96 - 00014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0004 CITY OF TIfGARD LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 96-0014 Sensitive Lands Review SLR 96-0004 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested: 1. Site Development review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. 2. Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow development within the 100-year floodplain. APPLICANT: Gary Kaufman OWNER: John Steiger 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Salem, OR 97302 Portland, OR 97229 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Office). ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Commercial). LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040(A), 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tiga-d Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100-percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee, and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 3. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct standard half- street improvements along the frontage of SW 87th Avenue to meet local commercial and industrial street standards. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage C. concrete curb D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface run-off E. five-foot concrete sidewalk F. street striping G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer H. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) street signs (if applicable) J. driveway apron (if applicable) K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 87th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 2 centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Myron Melick; Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 7165 SW Fir Loop, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 684-1510). 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall obtain ODOT and City approval of the proposed on-site storm drainage system and the proposed connection to the catch basin in SW Hall Boulevard. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 7. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit calculations from a registered professional civil engineer indicating the volume of grading to take place within the 100-year flood plain. The engineer shall also provide a statement as to whether or not the conveyance capability of the 100-year flood plain will be adversely affected by the proposed grading. 8. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea (639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. revised impervious surface/landscaping calculation B. parking lot trees planted in landscaped islands at each end of the row of parking in order to provide a canopy effect, and screening around the perimeter of the revised parking area C. street trees along the entire length of SW Hall Boulevard as well as along SW 87th Avenue D one (1) bicycle parking space E revised plans that demonstrates compliance with vision clearance criteria F buffering and screening in accordance with Section 18.100.080(D) and (E) G. A plan that shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off. The applicant shall also obtain from the disposal hauler, a written sign-off on the location of, and the compatibility of facilities. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 3 H. a mitigation plan shall be submitted that provides mitigation of 160 caliper inches. The arborist report was prior to the revised plan (dated 8/13/96) and therefore, does not reflect the potential to preserve tree #7, a 40 inch Oak tree. Retainage of this tree will reduce the total number of caliper inches to approximately 133 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to consult with the arborist regarding this tree and submit a revised report and mitigation plan. 9. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers or documentation that such permits are not required. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 10. Prior to issuance of a C of 0, the applicant shall complete the public improvements associated with this project. 11. All site improvement shall be installed as approved per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: In 1973, a street vacation was granted (R&O 78-182) for a portion of SW Mapleleaf Street. The property was the recipient of a portion of the vacated public right-of-way. A ten-foot pedestrian easement (5 feet on the subject site) was retained within the vacated area. No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City. Vicinity Information: Property to the north is zoned C-N (Neighborhood Commercial). Property to the west is zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) and R-12 (Residential. 12 units per acre). Property to the south is zoned C-G (General Commercial). The abutting property to the south is developed with a single-family residence. The abutting property to the north is vacant. Property on the west side of SW 87th Avenue is developed with a mix of single- family and multi-family residential uses. NOTICE OF DECISION SCR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 4 Site Information and Proposal Description The approximately 37,967 square foot site fronts onto SW 87th Avenue and SW Hall Boulevard and contains a number of mature trees. The property slopes southeasterly from an elevation of approximately 179 feet to an elevation of approximately 168 feet. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence and construct a 6,480 square foot children's day care center on the southern half of the property. The proposed plan would allow approximately two feet of fill within the 100-year floodplain for the construction of a portion of a sidewalk. The proposal would also allow approximately 42 feet of excavation for a water quality facility. There will be no net rise of the 100-year floodplain as a result of this proposed cut and fill within the floodplain. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,480 square foot children's day care center. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Children's day care. Code Section 18.64.030 lists Children's day care as a permitted use in the C-P zone. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.64.050 states that the minimum lot size is 6,000 square feet and the minimum lot width is 50 feet in the C-P zone. Developments within the C- P zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant is proposing to develop the southern half of the property, with the remaining portion to remain undeveloped. The applicant's narrative states that the lot will consist of approximately 17% building area, 20% landscape and outdoor play area, 27% parking and driveway area, and 36% undeveloped land. The preliminary plan provides approximately 20% landscaping based upon the phased development of the property. Since the preliminary plan has been revised, a revised impervious surface/landscaping calculation shall be submitted that reflects the changes in the plan. Setbacks: Section 18.64.050 states that there are no setback requirements, except 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use within the district abuts a residential zoning district. The site does not abut a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet. The applicant is proposing a building of 20 feet, well under the maximum height allowed. Section 18.120.180(A)(1) (Site Development Review - Approval Standards) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters, 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 5 under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Code Section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The site is currently developed with a residential structure and contains a number of mature trees. An arborist report has been submitted which addresses preservation of trees on the property. In accordance with Section 18.150, trees greater than 12 inch caliper will be mitigated. The plan will also include new parking lot and street trees. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria shall be satisfied as addressed in the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130) section below. Section 18.120.180.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the preliminary site plans, screening of the parking area has been provided in accordance with this section. The applicant's revised plan (dated 8/13/96) made changes to the parking area. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted that provides screening of the revised parking lot. Pedestrian Pathway: Section 18.120.180.9 requires that where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. The pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan generally shows a proposed pathway following SW Hall Boulevard to extend south of SW Oak Street and beyond Highway 217. The proposed pathway generally follows the 100-year floodplain and City greenway system. The subject property is just north of the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street. The property contains one-half of a ten-foot pedestrian easement, created with the vacation of SW Mapleleaf Street in 1973. Requiring the dedication of land for the purposes of a pathway is not necessary given the existing easement on the property. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. This section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 6 is satisfied as the City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the plans and has offered no objections or comments. Chapter 18.84.015(B) states that the Director shall review minimal ground disturbances or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material; except in the floodway area. Chapter 18.84.040(A) states that the approval authori` shall approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. The proposed plan (revised 8/13/96) and Engineer calculations show that there is no net fill in the 100-year floodplain. The plan shows that approximately 2 cubic yards of fill will be offset by approximately 42 cubic yards of excavated material. Since there is no net fill, there will be no increase in the level of the 100-year floodplain elevation. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this parcel is C-P (Professional Office). Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood. The proposed plan and Engineer Calculations show that there is no net fill in the 100-year floodplain. The plan shows that approximately 2 cubic yards of fill will be offset by approximately 42 cubic yards of excavated material. Since there is no net fill, there will be no increase in the level of the 100-year floodplain elevation. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely. The pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan generally shows a proposed pathway following SW Hall Boulevard to extend south of SW Oak Street and beyond Highway 217. The proposed pathway generally follows the 100-year floodplain and City greenway system. The subject property is just north of the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street. A pathway within this portion of the floodplain would not necessarily enhance the feasibility of the pathway system. Given the proximity to the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street, a pathway is not required of this property. Since the City now has a System Development Charge for pathway purchase and construction, dedication is not necessary. Required pathway areas will be purchased if in accordance with the City pedestrian pathway system. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 7 The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. This criteria is not applicable as a pathway will not be constructed in conjunction with this application. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers or documentation that such permits are not required. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. When the City seeks to acquire a real property interest through the development approval process it must insure that the extent of the requirement is roughly proportional to the impact caused by that development. In this case, the applicant has shown that there will be no adverse impact on the 100-year floodplain elevation by providing greater cut than proposed fill in the floodplain. There is little evidence in the record to support the finding that a dedication for drainage and floodplain purposes is roughly proportional to the impact caused by the proposed cut and fill. Since the City now has a System Development Charge for pathway purchase and construction, dedication is not necessary. Required pathway areas will be purchased if they are in accordance with the City pedestrian pathway system. Also, as previously discussed, dedication for pathway purposes in not necessary given the existing pedestrian easement on the property. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement is satisfied as the applicant has submitted a landscape plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed plan partially complies with this criteria. The preliminary plan shows the provision of five (5) Capitol Flowering Pear trees on SW Hall Boulevard, spaced 25 feet on center, partially satisfying this criteria. A revised plan has been submitted which develops the majority of the frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. Street trees shall therefore, be planted along the entire length of SW Hall Boulevard. Street trees have also not been provided along SW 87th Avenue. A revised site plan shall be submitted that provides street trees along the entire length of SW Hall Boulevard as well as along SW 87th Avenue, in accordance with this section. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 8 landscape islands shall be three (3) feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed plan partially complies with this criteria. Screening has been provided around the perimeter of the parking a,ea, as shown on the preliminary plan. Given the plans revision to remove the parking area from the floodplain, a revised landscape plan shall be provided that provides parking lot trees, planted in landscaped islands, at each end of the row of parking, in order to provide canopy effect and screening around the perimeter of the revised parking area. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculatirro widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Mat, indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential structure, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. Section 18.100.080(0) states that the minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1.) At least one (1) row of trees shall be planted. They shall be; not less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous trees and five (5) feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2.) In addition, at least 10, five-gallon shrubs or; 20, one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3.) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover, or spread with bark mulch. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.100.080(E) states that where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1.) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (4) foot continuous screen within two (2) years of planting, or; 2.) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that will form a continuous screen six (6) feet in height within two (2) years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or bark mulch, or; 3.) A five (5) foot or taller fence, or wall, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The adjoining property to the south contains a single family residence. Therefore, a 20-foot buffer and screening area is required. This buffer area contains approximately 3,000 square feet. Therefore, the buffer shall contain 30, five-gallon; or 60, one-gallon shrubs in addition to the one (1) row of trees. As indicated on the site plan, screening has not been provided within the buffer area. Section 18.100.070.0 states that in lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides for buffering and screening in accordance with these standards. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 9 intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3), and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The proposed plan does not comply with the vision clearance criteria. A corner of the proposed building is within the vision clearance area on the south side of the driveway. On the north side of the driveway, it appears that the grade of the driveway is below the grade of the area to remain undeveloped. The applicant shall provide details of the grades within the vision clearance area to determine compliance with this section. Minimum Off-Street Parkina: Section 18.106.030(B)(3) requires a minimum of five (5) parking space plus one (1) per classroom for Children's day care. The proposed floor plan (sheet 2 of 9) shows seven (7) classrooms. The number of parking spaces required is 12 spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 18 parking spaces, satisfying this section. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA}, which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires one (1) disabled parking spaces if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. This section is satisfied as the proposed site plan shows the provision of one (1) disabled person parking space. Bicycle Parkins: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. One bicycle parking space will be required for this development. The proposed plan does not show the provision of a bicycle parking space. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides for one (1) bicycle parking space. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one access drive with a driveway width of 24 feet, thereby, satisfying this requirement. This driveway provides access to SW 87th Avenue. SW Hall Boulevard is designated as an arterial on the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. Code section 18.108.060(B) states that direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. Since SW 87th Avenue is classified as a local street and there are no prohibitions regarding access to SW 87th Avenue in the Comprehensive Plan or Metzger-Progress Community Plan, the proposed driveway is acceptable. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 10 Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation, except that pedestria.i crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet f appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials °e used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle '.;verhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The plan shows a pedestrian connection to SW 87th Avenue and SW Hall Boulevard, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Signs: Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P zone. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Service Technicians. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The arborist report (dated 7/2/96) and plan identifies the type and size of the trees on the property. This report identifies thirteen trees greater than 12-inch caliper in size. Section 18.150.025.B.2(b) states that retainage of 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D. The proposed plan will preserve four trees (30%) greater than 12-inch caliper, with a total of 243 caliper inches. Therefore, a mitigation plan shall be submitted that provides mitigation of 160 caliper inches. The arborist report was prior to the revised plan (dated 8/13/96) and therefore, does not reflect the potential to preserve tree #7, a 40 inch Oak tree. Retainage of this tree will reduce the total number of caliper inches to approximately 133 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to consult with the arborist regarding this tree and submit a revised report and mitigation plan. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 11 STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard and SW 87th Avenue. Hall Boulevard is classified as an arterial street and is under ODOT jurisdiction. Right-of-way (ROW) standards for this roadway call for a total of 90 feet (45 feet from centerline). Existing ROW adjacent to this site is 40 feet from centerline. The applicant will be required to dedicate additional ROW along Hall Boulevard to provide the required 45 feet from centerline. Hall Boulevard is currently improved in this area with curb and sidewalk. No additional improvements are required. SW 87th Avenue is classified as a local commercial and industrial street which requires a total ROW width of 50 feet. The existing ROW width adjacent to this site is adequate. No additional dedications are required. The roadway is currently paved for two-lane traffic, but the condition of the existing pavement is questionable and likely does not meet City standards for structural section. In order to mitigate the additional traffic impact from this development, the applicant should be required to construct a half-street improvement adjacent to the site frontage. The local commercial and industrial street standard calls for 17 feet of pavement from curb to centerline and a 5-foot sidewalk. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 87th Avenue that is available to serve this site. The applicant's plans indicate that a new service lateral will be extended to the site from the main line. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site will flow to the southeast corner of the property where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility. From there, the storm water is proposed to be discharged into an existing catch basin in Hall Boulevard. ODOT will need to review and approve of the final design for this connection and will likely require on-site detention of the storm water, as well as treatment. The applicant should prepare engineering calculations for the storm drainage system and submit to ODOT as soon as practical to avoid delays in the review process. The City will not release a building permit for this project until ODOT has approved of the storm drainage connection. Copies of the calculations should also be submitted to Brian Rager, in the City's Engineering Department. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-00141 SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 12 method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance c • a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a • maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant is proposing to install an on-site water quality pond to treat the storm water before being discharged into the public system. As of the writing of these comments, Staff was unable to determine if the proposed pond will be large enough to adequately serve the site because preliminary sizing calculations were not provided. However, this site is large enough to allow adjustments in the size of the pond if necessary. As was stated in the previous section, COOT may require on-site detention of storm water also. If this occurs, the proposed pond could be designed and sized to provide both treatment of the summer events and detention of winter flows. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amcunt of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant is proposing some limited grading activity within the 100-year flood plain which is located at or below the 169-foot elevation. It appears that the grading will result in a net removal of material in the flood plain and therefore, no net fill. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant will need to provide engineered calculations indicating the volume of grading to take place within the flood plain and a statement from an engineer as to whether or not the grading activity will adversely impact the conveyance ability of the flood plain. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department, Maintenance Services, and Building Division have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this proposal and states that hydraulic review will be required before storm drain connection to ODOT's system. Permits will be required for any work done in ODOT right-of-way. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this proposal and states that hydrants and access are acceptable. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 13 Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed this proposal and states 1'1/2" and larger water meters are required to have double check following except high hazard may require reduced pressure principle type backflow preventer. Unified Sewerage Agency and PGE have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION.SHALL BE FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 11, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 11, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. u �u �it�v,1 August 26, 1996 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner /��`' ��,�•= { ' /7 Z)( 6 >� 1 August 26, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager I\CURPLH\PATTYISDR96.12 dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 14 — - z---C. < iiLL BLut. > i' w _ I- - � L141 II-_ . - I/.. ...H4 - : ' LI i 'N tL t. S. •tom w 1 ,1 F. I.... Z : Z Z • a - 4 . - = a J I i P'..-&:f - ! .5tct,sat W ' J+ . a4YG c`s in ; 1 L u.4e,s,v I 41 k ! a CD , L i .. .4. , o■ I 2 Ols rrZr�ur f I- < S, W. $ -rw _ A■ /i • U _ 1 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP SIB 96-0014 • Wanda;Tree Day Caro Cntr. , d 1 I ■ /// // ST I ' ii I 1 1 I g LANDAU , (,.,I 111 II/ 1 1141m0 ' lb In C , ST i___ t . , . • •■ , . ,.= _I- 2 ' LOCUST 03 I - - CI ( ' ST -- MAPLELEA ! Ow) ---- ' 101 1 ___________ __ • ..... 7V 7 zi sT = C co OW CI OAK mmi 111 m y 1 A a . ..... L... CO MI 0) H. .. PINE ST .1-7----- I p 0 a , .u'R CE ST _. in SRRUCE Vicinity Map A SDR 96-0014 L,..\ Learning Tree Day Care Cntr. N REQUEST FOR COMMENTS `, /� MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON .7 (P DATE: July 25, 1996 q; TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer 44/QX� RE: SDR 96-0014, Learning Tree Day Care Center Description: The proposal is for a 6,460 square foot (sf) children's day care center located at 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard and SW 87th Avenue. Hall Boulevard is classified as an arterial street and is under ODOT jurisdiction. Right-of-way (ROW) standards for this roadway call for a total of 90 feet (45 feet from centerline). Existing ROW adjacent to this site is 40 feet from centerline. The applicant will be required to dedicate additional ROW along Hall Boulevard to provide the required 45 feet from centerline. Hall Boulevard is currently improved in this area with curb and sidewalk. No additional improvements are required. SW 87th Avenue is classified as a local commercial and industrial street which requires a total ROW width of 50 feet. The existing ROW width adjacent to this site is adequate. No additional dedications are required. The roadway is currently paved for two-lane traffic, but the condition of the existing pavement is questionable and likely does not meet City standards for structural section. In order to mitigate the additional traffic impact from this development, the applicant should be required to construct a half- street improvement adjacent to the site frontage. The local commercial and industrial street standard calls for 17 feet of pavement from curb to centerline and a 5-foot sidewalk. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 1 2. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 87th Avenue that is available to serve this site. The applicant's plans indicate that a new service lateral will be extended to the site from the main line. 3. Storm Drainage: Storm water from this site will flow to the southeast corner of the property where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility. From there, the storm water is proposed to be discharged into an existing catch basin in Hall Boulevard. ODOT will need to review and approve of the final design for this connection and will likely require on-site detention of the storm water, as well as treatment. The applicant should prepare engineering calculations for the storm drainage system and submit to ODOT as soon as practical to avoid delays in the review process. The City will not release a building permit for this project until ODOT has approved of the storm drainage connection. Copies of the calculations should also be submitted to Brian Rager, in the City's Engineering Department. 4. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant is proposing to install an on-site water quality pond to treat the storm water before being discharged into the public system. As of the writing of these comments, Staff was unable to determine if the proposed pond will be large enough to adequately serve the site because preliminary sizing calculations were not provided. However, this site is large enough to allow adjustments in the size of the pond if necessary. As was stated in the previous section, ODOT may require on-site detention of storm water also. If this occurs, the proposed pond could be designed ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 2 and sized to provide both treatment of the summer events and detention of winter flows. 5. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91- 47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant is proposing some limited grading activity within the 100- year flood plain which is located at or below the 169-foot elevation. It appears that the grading will result in a net removal of material in the flood plain and therefore, no net fill. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant will need to provide engineered calculations indicating the volume of grading to take place within the flood plain and a statement from an engineer as to whether or not the grading activity will adversely impact the conveyance ability of the flood plain. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 3 has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 3. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW 87th Avenue to meet local commercial and industrial street standards. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage c. concrete curb d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff e. 5 foot concrete sidewalk f. street striping g. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer h. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) street signs (if applicable) j. driveway apron (if applicable) k. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 87th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Myron Melick; Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 7165 SW Fir Loop, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 684-1510). 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall obtain ODOT and City approval of the proposed on-site storm drainage system and the proposed connection to the catch basin in SW Hall Boulevard. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 4 Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 7. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit calculations from a registered professional civil engineer indicating the volume of grading to take place within the 100-year flood plain. The engineer shall also provide a statement as to whether or not the conveyance capability of the 100-year flood plain will be adversely affected by the proposed grading. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 8. Prior to issuance of a C of 0, the applicant shall complete the public improvements associated with this project. APPROVED: Greg Berry, Acting City Engineer is\eng\brianr\sdr96-14.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 5 i4CL-4) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: July 25, 1996 TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer ApogErs RE: SDR 96-0014, Learning Tree Day Care Center Description: The proposal is for a 6,460 square foot (sf) children's day care center located at 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). Findings: 1. Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard and SW 87th Avenue. Hall Boulevard is classified as an arterial street and is under ODOT jurisdiction. Right-of-way (ROW) standards for this roadway call for a total of 90 feet (45 feet from centerline). Existing ROW adjacent to this site is 40 feet from centerline. The applicant will be required to dedicate additional ROW along Hall Boulevard to provide the required 45 feet from centerline. Hall Boulevard is currently improved in this area with curb and sidewalk. No additional improvements are required. SW 87th Avenue is classified as a local commercial and industrial street which requires a total ROW width of 50 feet. The existing ROW width adjacent to this site is adequate. No additional dedications are required. The roadway is currently paved for two-lane traffic, but the condition of the existing pavement is questionable and likely does not meet City standards for structural section. In order to mitigate the additional traffic impact from this development, the applicant should be required to construct a half- street improvement adjacent to the site frontage. The local commercial and industrial street standard calls for 17 feet of pavement from curb to centerline and a 5-foot sidewalk. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 1 2. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 87th Avenue that is available to serve this site. The applicant's plans indicate that a new service lateral will be extended to the site from the main line. 3. Storm Drainage: Storm water from this site will flow to the southeast corner of the property where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility. From there, the storm water is proposed to be discharged into an existing catch basin in Hall Boulevard. ODOT will need to review and approve of the final design for this connection and will likely require on-site detention of the storm water, as well as treatment. The applicant should prepare engineering calculations for the storm drainage system and submit to ODOT as soon as practical to avoid delays in the review process. The City will not release a building permit for this project until ODOT has approved of the storm drainage connection. Copies of the calculations should also be submitted to Brian Rager, in the City's Engineering Department. 4. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant is proposing to install an on-site water quality pond to treat the storm water before being discharged into the public system. As of the writing of these comments, Staff was unable to determine if the proposed pond will be large enough to adequately serve the site because preliminary sizing calculations were not provided. However, this site is large enough to allow adjustments in the size of the pond if necessary. As was stated in the previous section, ODOT may require on-site detention of storm water also. If this occurs, the proposed pond could be designed ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 2 and sized to provide both treatment of the summer events and detention of winter flows. 5. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91- 47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 3. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW 87th Avenue to ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 3 meet local commercial and industrial street standards. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage c. concrete curb d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff e. 5 foot concrete sidewalk f. street striping g. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer h. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) street signs (if applicable) j. driveway apron (if applicable) k. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 87th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Myron Melick; Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 7165 SW Fir Loop, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 684-1510). 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall obtain ODOT and City approval of the proposed on-site storm drainage system and the proposed connection to the catch basin in SW Hall Boulevard. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 4 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 7. Prior to issuance of a C of 0, the applicant shall complete the public improvements associated with this project. APPROVED: Greg Berry, Acting City Engineer is\eng\brianr\sdr96-14.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care PAGE 5 FROM:KONICA FAX TO: 503 684 7297 JUL 19, 1989 11:59AM P.01 Art- 1 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: Joie 11, 1996 TO: is. ! Ede .- - ,' •• ..a, • * 100 Z.- ' si (PROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: WilliamD'Andrea (x315) Phone:(503)639.4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: _ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR)96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER < A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM IS1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR ENTS BACK BY: Eftday - June 21, 199&. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact - _ of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: //7_44.,2c,41./, r r ee cei (�f j i r ,� .tr t° f7� f r - 5/0 v..1Ni rifry t � Old 7 (TT Lf 1 v3° 41" fr— GAT E'V// ‘7t frfr./ 4- (Please/M/1 c thefJflowing i,fonnatton) Name of Person(s) Commenting: CZet/1--- OA, Phone Number(s): Z Z q — 500 7 if PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMrNTS 06/12/96 12:41 $503 526 2538 TV FIRE MARSHAL Z 003.'003 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUN 1 2 1996 DATE: .tune 11. 1986 FIRE OFRCE TO: Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER < _ A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, VE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: KWe have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: J ( l�C -� .)0 L SUS S (/L f� / G � �t�C ./5 L Z J � (Aroseprovide the fo[tct ngInformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: / 1 ` / 7„., e()( t Phone Number(s): , r Z S`2) SDR 96.0C14 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER OROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING 1V JUN 2 7 199& CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 11. 1996 TO: Lee Walker. USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER < A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460- square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. D ; Please contact of our office. tiyj' Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 196 By (lease provide thefollawinginfonnation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: r ' MOC /\ Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED r✓,.,, , Utak RECEIVED PLANNING JUN 2 01996 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER 1A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,4601 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near#+ Ftou wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday=June 21, 1996. u may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: tc ?-,- Gv N/fi e rs u v`r '7 C- frAtv Ofeasepmvich.the forfowinginformation) Name of Person(s) CIYI •ng• Phone Number(s): >Li Z .ls// SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1'VED PLANNING 11 Att, CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JN 2 0 1896 DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: David Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 - LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard. Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P[ease provide the forGywing information) Name of Person(s) Coln 1 � 1g: L I Phone Number(s): 3 U I SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: Elaine Self, GTE Engineering Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 y LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. i Written co)ments provided below: ck a I . I ' y4 ' s y �/ I 1 4 / '► (P1 asepnyvide the foff wi-;information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS LLP Li-44m r4(4,0 Q- w cJJces t. . - 1-4(S 44a c s ( do S CS STNS T2._t T �w. 11 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 17, 1996 TO: Pete Nelson, US West Communications FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460- square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 1. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide t fie folrawing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RF^F'YED PLANNING A JUN 171996 '+�„P �I '- ) CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: Brian Moore, PGE FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER ,” A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: `/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PCease provide the foil-owing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: �,,,, 5 ,- IPhone Number(s): c-1_,, , , (-a.... -7: t I SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING , =A i II CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUN 131996 DATE: J ne 1. 1996 1 .. l TO: o n £cker( Operations Maintenance Supervisor FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Pfease provide thefoffounng information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING 4t "UN 131996 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: Michael Miller, Operations Water Dept. Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 136.043E 3EAJO I o T L 4nti/ L" y iJ -6 z- `372i C,7- �'i— el1MME.tl75 2 /,3/ ,' ,:jetIn-/t--e•-jr (::::c■ 1 4 •■ (Ptase provide the fo lfowinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: III,CE" Mtu.,E,L Phone Number(s): / SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING AO- JUN 131996 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER `C A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460,- square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: .Ne have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ((lease provirfe the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting 1 Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (x315) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 ➢ LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 21, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • • (P aseprryvidetkefolrowing tnfonnation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS I F `QUEST FOR COMMEN' �+ NOT,, ,TION LIST FOR LAND USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLICA,,...NS 5D re -d "- -/4 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS Z-1-41111 irYe ki C4 r (circle one} _CIT Area: (W) (S) (E1 LC) ® Placed for review in Library CIT Book CITY DEPARTMENTS _BLDG.DEPT./David Scott,el,,,dingOtticla --/-POLICE DEPT./Kelley Jennings,a:,,ePrevenlwnoniPa ✓6PERATIONS/John Acker,Malnl.spy,,. _CITY ADMIN./Cathy Wheatley,clhRecader --G.DEPT./Brian Roger,D.vebanenlRer,....&Kw.er _COM.DEV.DEPT./D.S.T.'S _ADV.PLNG./Nadine Smith, P,anaings.p.rvea e.--" EATER DEPT./Michael Miller,°peranons Mgr./oPeralbm Mal Box SPECIAL DISTRICTS -E MARSHALL NIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa.County Fire District 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro,OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA.CO.DEPT.OF LAND USE&TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N.First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. #16,Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland.OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) TATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _METRO _Mike Borreson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 Mary Weber _Scott King(CPA's) Portland.OR 97225-0412 600 NE Grand Avenue _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) �- 1 175 Court Street,N.E. "ODOT/REGION 1 _CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem,OR 97310-0590 Laurie Nicholson/Trans.Planning Larry Conrad,Senior Planner 123 N.W.Flanders PO Box 4755 _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 1 120 SW 5th _CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland,OR 97204 DOT/REGION 1,DISTRICT 2-A Mike Matteucci.Neighborhood Coordinator Bob Schmidt/Engineering Coord. PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412 Beaverton,OR 97076 Planning Director Portland,OR 97225 Beaverton,OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard,OR 97281-3483 City Manager PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin,OR 97062 _<POTHER% Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _CITY OF KING CITY City Manager 15300 SW 116th Kina City,OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES �ENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC '- ORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Elaine Self,Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PC Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97291-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 NW NATURAL GAS CO. =none:lswl721-2441 _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer Fax:(303)721.2302 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox.Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _ICI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Clifford C.Cabe,Const.Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 5424 SE McLoughlin Pcrtland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97202 I STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _AERONAUTICS DIVISION(ODOT) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _US POSTAL SERVICE _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H.PARK _FISH&WILDLIFE Randy Hammock,Growth Cord. _PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY _U.S.ARMY CORPS.OF ENGINEERS Portland,OR 97229-9998 OTHER t,\logo\Potty\mas rNS\rlcnotc.mcl MAILING RECORDS • City of Tigard,Oragoa AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. bC1 That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑ PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Ctrck box.bona,of.ppric.b+.) (check appropnate box below} (Enter Public Heanng Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission d Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Chuck bon above..amicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Cbeck box.bc.a.r.pprcaa.) (Check appropriate box below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of whic is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was ailed to each ed p son(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached ist(s), marked Exhibit "B" • the r-14 of L� 199 , and deposited in the U ited Stags • -• on y- ;ay ofal,ef 199 F , postage prepaid. _ fa / • /_ /� Z24 Pr-.ared Notice • Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of afildiJ , 19 OFFICIAL SEAL 1. DIANE M JELDERKS I • NOTARY PUBLI -OREGON '� COMMISSION NO.046142 !! NOTARY PUBLIC •F •REGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999! My Commission Ex.'re's: Ci 7 91 7FILE INFO.:D NAME(S): /9/40-/v//4 7 y / i7 CASE NO(S). SP 4(, - /jL f TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: EXIJI CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARIN.3S OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 26. 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL. BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: • BILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0004 -ILE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER '.PPLICANT: Gary Kaufman OWNER: John Steiger 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Salem, OR 97302 Portland, OR 97229 REQUEST The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. Also requested is Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow fill within the 100- year floodplain. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. 3DR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF 8126/96 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT V\ -EN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROF "ED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBL. .TEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MA'. PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL ANA WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHEF MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER AUGUST 5, 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. i E LANDAU ST 11%111 II .1 rLOCUS• MEI MO U .. _ —I I III - 1\ I I+nAPLEiEA Nur R 5T J i I PINE ST I ( m.. I f I 11 I I SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARINGS OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING 5�R qt, -/4 L r/i ri Try Dry eArr 603 • 1 of.2) 1S135AA-01901 1S135AA-01400 EXi ASCHENBRENNER,STEVEN L BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 5425 SW LOMBARD 2900 SW GREENBERG RD BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01900 1S135AA-90001 BOOTH,JOICE GOSSETT BROUSE,WANDA JANE AND 10250 SW 87TH AVE PETTY,JOHN A PORTLAND,OR 97223 10301 SW 87TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 1S135AA-01800 CAIN,JAMES L CHAVEZ,HELEN W 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD 8407 SW LOCUST SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 1S135AA-90007 CHRISTENSEN,JACK L AND NANCY CONNET,CARLEE SUE 8805 SW OAK ST 10313 SW 87TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90004 1S135AD-01200 CONSER,JEAN H AND CROUCH,THELMA C ESTATE HURST,JOSEPHINE Go DAVIS EUGENE L AND VIVIAN 10307 SW 87TH#4 BY ROBERT SAIZ,CPA TIGARD,OR 97223 12753 SW 68TH PKWY STE 220 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S135AA-03702 1S135AA-90000 CULLINAN,RANDY J AND DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS KRISTINA G OWNERS OF UNITS 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00590 1S135AA-00500 EIDENSCHINK,IRMA EIDENSCHINK,IRM SW LOCUST DRIVE 8740 CQJT DRIVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 RTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-03700 1S135AA-02700 ELLIOTT,THOMAS G&MARIA T HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 9380 SW 82ND#2 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 SUITE 104 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-90002 1S135AA-02801 HAWLEY,HAZEL M HIRNING,DOROTHY AND 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 SARGEANT,SHARON PORTLAND,OR 97223 6325 SW 90TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-03707 1S135AA-90005 HITCH,DORIS LAIRD,SHAWN W&LOUISE M PO BOX 35 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE BEAVERTON,OR 97075 PORTLAND,OR 97223 sa R q&-/4 Lea r ni7n 77- Cn r (��-_ & fa) 1 S135AA-02500 1 S135AA-02100 LYON,DONALD J HAZEL J NORTHLAND HOMES INC y 10440 SW 87TH AVE 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-01500 1 S135AA-02600 PEPPER,MURRAY TR& PETERSON,THEODORE S AND PEPPER,JAMES ET AL DEAN,VIRGINIA J BY BANK OF AMERICA OREGON 8686 SW OAK PO BOX 6400-UNIT#2814 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97228 1S135AA-02000 1S135AA-03705 PRUNK,WILLIAM H ROMERO,MERCEDES G AND STEIGER,JOHN M MOLINA,MARTHA A 301 NW MURRAY BLVD 10385 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 35AA-90003 1S1 35AA-90006 SHERWOOD,SYDNEY L TAYLOR,J EDWARD AND 10305 SW 87TH NEWSOME-TAYLOR,PHYLLIS M TIGARD,OR 97223 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S135AA-03704 WILLIAMS,RODNEY GV 10455 SW 87TH AVE • TIGARD,OR 97223 22 EI IMP S. SALEM CR 97332 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8 6 01 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIV !D •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. .`I+G 19 1996 •Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit •Accounts Payable • OF TIGARD AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Mon- day, August 26, 1996, at 7 P.M.,at Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall, STATE OF OREGON, ) 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon.Both public,oral and written COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS. testimony is invited.The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal I, Kathy Snyder Code,and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer.Failure to raise an being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements or evidence suffi- Director, or his principal clerk, of theT 1 gard-TUa 1 a t i n Times cient to allow the hearings authority and all parties to respond precludes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community and 193.020; published at Tigard in the Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is aforesaid county and state; that the directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion.Further information Public Hearing SDR96-0014 may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 S.W. Hall a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223,or by calling(503)639-4171. entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and PUBLIC HEARING: consecutive in the following issues: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)96-0014/ August 15 , 1996 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR)96-0004 >LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER< The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow )6:)tid Q the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care JGh r c�p� center. Also requested is Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow fill ll within the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 10360 S.W. 87th Avenue. Subscribed and sworn to ore me thisl5th day of August,1-990 (WCTM 1S 1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040, /' `.i.lt . 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and GCS'► f ��-t ` :,w.�, ,"^i 18.164.ZONE: C-P(Professional Commercial).The Professional Corn- Notary Pu•yd for Oregon `4`. + mercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public my( support facilities, professional services, financial,insurance,real estate My Commission Expires: --- . services,business support services,and multiple-family residential units, AFFIDAVIT among others. TT8601 -Publish August 15, 1996. City of Tigard,Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: , oj that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The CTigard, Oregon. lei That I served NOTICE OF ( PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Check box abode.W appicable) (check appropnate box belay} (Enter Public Heanng Date above) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Check bbx above. applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (buck box above,If applicable) (check appropriate box below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of wh'- is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each na ed pers9n(s) at the addres (s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhib- 'B", •• y- da •f et /La- 199 , and deposited in the U,ited States ail o / ■`'of , - 199((- , postage prepaid. ,416(‘/LY AftifirriiliMA6.4 Pr ared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 1 e OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ,/1 ' -(I, `,,� COMMISSION N0.046142 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 NOTARY PUBLIC pi REGO Gj My Commission Ex•Ires: 7 ; ./FILE INFO.:? I NAME(S):Liarp/p • -rie�'C Dom"'/ t �Cy,(y/7 r CASE NO(S): 5,17 /(0-LYE/4`J�-!� �P—(.9c�'4 TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE:l i° %/V lS arfry6 I GT}/J )�' V12661/46, , • 44, • 44- CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF CANCELLATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 1996 AT 7:00 PM, HAS BEEN CANCELED FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0004 FILE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER APPLICANT: Gary Kaufman OWNER: John Steiger 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Salem, OR 97302 Portland, OR 97229 REQUEST The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. Also requested was a Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow fill within the 100-year floodplain. THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE PROPOSAL SUCH THAT THERE WILL BE NO NET FILL WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. THE REVISED PLAN WILL PLACE A PORTION OF A SIDEWALK WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN BUT ALSO PROVIDES FOR REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 40 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL. GIVEN THE CHANGE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN, THERE WILL BE NO NET RISE IN THE LEVEL OF THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. SINCE THERE IS LESS THAN 50 CUBIC YARDS OF EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN, THE CITY DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES ONLY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AND NO PUBLIC HEARING. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, CRITERIA: 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. A NOTICE OF DECISION SHALL BE MAILED ON THURSDAY AUGUST 29, 1996 REGARDING THE APPLICANT'S REVISED PLAN. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. 1 , - , , i / // ST J g LANDAU i. •�°i C ST i- I w ■ H - .- cn - ft LOCUST C9 - Cl co ST Q W 0 Q 1 ' I • , • MAPLELEA- .s b i R rillkt > N • 1.*- . c ti, . _ c CO ..4 77. ______ Ig ___________ ap ST il - // OAK OAK/ : CO mLIIII PINE ST PINE 4., Id 0 U 1111 I in ' 1 1------ 4-1-/ )LI-j-q •'R CE ST r SRRUCE Vicinity Map SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care Cntr. N • DIt `I Ct. -/4 ri j Tl oa 05 • 14+ ) I S135AA-01901 1 S135AA-01400 ASCHENBRENNER,STEVEN L BESLEY PROPERTIES INC ��� �� 5425 SW LOMBARD 2900 SW GREENBERG RD kEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01900 1S135AA-90001 BOOTH,JOICE GOSSETT BROUSE,WANDA JANE AND 10250 SW 87TH AVE PETTY.JOHN A PORTLAND,OR 97223 10301 SW 87TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 1S135AA-01800 CAIN,JAMES L CHAVEZ,HELEN W 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD 8407 SW LOCUST SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PORTLAND.OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 1S135M-90007 CHRISTENSEN,JACK L AND NANCY CONNET,CARLEE SUE 8805 SW OAK ST 10313 SW 87TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90004 1S135AD-01200 CONSER,JEAN H AND CROUCH,THELMA C ESTATE HURST,JOSEPHINE Go DAVIS EUGENE L AND VIVIAN 10307 SW 87TH#4 BY ROBERT SAIZ,CPA TIGARD,OR 97223 12753 SW 68TH PKWY STE 220 T1GARD,OR 97224 1S135AA-03702 1S135AA-90000 CULLINAN,RANDY J AND DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS KRISTINA G OWNERS OF UNITS 8775 SW OAK STREET T1GARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00590 1S135AA-00500 EIDENSCHINK,IRMA EIDENSCHINK,IR 8740 SW LOCUST DRIVE 8740 T DRIVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 RTLAND,OR 97223 is 135AA-03700 1 S 135M-02700 ELLIOTT,THOMAS G&MARIA T HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 9380 SW 82ND#2 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 SUITE 104 PORTLAND.OR 97201 1S135AA-90002 1S135AA-02801 HAWLEY,HAZEL M HIRNING,DOROTHY AND 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 SARGEANT,SHARON PORTLAND,OR 97223 6325 SW 90TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S1 35AA-03707 1 S 135AA-90005 HITCH,DORIS LAIRD,SHAWN W&LOUISE M PO BOX 35 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE BEAVERTON,OR 97075 PORTLAND.OR 97223 SDK 'Ile Lea-. ri1, J Ti- Cyr CM-r ( - a o fa) ) 1S135AA-02500 1S135AA-02100 LYON,DONALD J HAZEL J NORTHLAND HOMES INC 10440 SW 87TH AVE 1834 SW 58TH x202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-01500 1S135AA-02600 PEPPER,MURRAY TR 8 PETERSON,THEODORE S AND PEPPER,JAMES ET AL DEAN,VIRGINIA J BY BANK OF AMERICA OREGON 8686 SW OAK PO BOX 6400-UNIT#2814 T1GARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97228 1S135AA-02000 1S135AA-03705 PRUNK,WILLIAM H ROMERO,MERCEDES G AND STEIGER,JOHN M MOLINA,MARTHA A 301 NW MURRAY BLVD 10385 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90003 1S135AA-90006 SHERWOOD,SYDNEY L TAYLOR,J EDWARD AND 10305 SW 87TH NEWSOME-TAYLOR,PHYLLIS M TIGARD,OR 97223 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-03704 WILLIAMS,RODNEY G 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 Y"]22 ELEGRADD LiCP S. S4LFT9 G. 9732 �. • City of Tigard,Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: {a»cx box above,if appucaenl {check approbnate box below} (Enter Pubic Meanng Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer ,. ❑ Tigard City Council V That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Chock boo above.If appYa:abb) City of Tigard Planning Director That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (chock boa ab r.*r applicabia) {ohmic appropriate box below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of e PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) cf whit is attached, marked Exhibit "A", wapAied to each n.;'-d perso (s) at the addres(s) shown on the attached Ii (s), marked •" "B" °pr- .a7, - da •f /fi lL� 19 , and deposited in the U ed Stat-s Mail •n the �4 - day •f 4e. . 199 , postage prepaid. Ate Prepared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the da y of NOtkir-- • 1912 OFFICIAL SEAL ESE." ® UtiMk 0(a./ MY CO MMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 NOTARY PUBLI OF OREGON My Commission • es: 611? � FILE INFO.• �}'�{�� C�� NAME(S): ar free_ 'J CASE NO.(S): 5 9 -604 TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0004 CITY OFTIGARD LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 96-0014 Sensitive Lands Review SLR 96-0004 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested: 1. Site Development review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. 2. Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow development within the 100-year floodplain. APPLICANT: Gary Kaufman OWNER: John Steiger 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Salem, OR 97302 Portland, OR 97229 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Office). ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P (Professional Commercial). LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040(A), 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100-percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee, and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 3. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct standard half- street improvements along the frontage of SW 87th Avenue to meet local commercial and industrial street standards. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage C. concrete curb D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface run-off E. five-foot concrete sidewalk F. street striping G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer H. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) street signs (if applicable) J. driveway apron (if applicable) K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 87th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 2 centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Myron Melick; Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 7165 SW Fir Loop, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 684-1510). 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall obtain ODOT and City approval of the proposed on-site storm drainage system and the proposed connection to the catch basin in SW Hall Boulevard. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 7. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit calculations from a registered professional civil engineer indicating the volume of grading to take place within the 100-year flood plain. The engineer shall also provide a statement as to whether or not the conveyance capability of the 100-year flood plain will be adversely affected by the proposed grading. 8. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea (639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. revised impervious surface/landscaping calculation B. parking lot trees planted in landscaped islands at each end of the row of parking in order to provide a canopy effect, and screening around the perimeter of the revised parking area C. street trees along the entire length of SW Hall Boulevard as well as along SW 87th Avenue D one (1) bicycle parking space E revised plans that demonstrates compliance with vision clearance criteria F buffering and screening in accordance with Section 18.100.080(D) and (E) G. A plan that shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off. The applicant shall also obtain from the disposal hauler, a written sign-off on the location of, and the compatibility of facilities. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 3 H. a mitigation plan shall be submitted that provides mitigation of 160 caliper inches. The arborist report was prior to the revised plan (dated 8/13/96) and therefore, does not reflect the potential to preserve tree #7, a 40 inch Oak tree. Retainage of this tree will reduce the total number of caliper inches to approximately 133 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to consult with the arborist regarding this tree and submit a revised report and mitigation plan. 9. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers or documentation that such permits are not required. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 10. Prior to issuance of a C of 0, the applicant shall complete the public improvements associated with this project. 11. All site improvement shall be installed as approved per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: In 1973, a street vacation was granted (R&O 78-182) for a portion of SW Mapleleaf Street. The property was the recipient of a portion of the vacated public right-of-way. A ten-foot pedestrian easement (5 feet on the subject site) was retained within the vacated area. No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City. Vicinity Information: Property to the north is zoned C-N (Neighborhood Commercial). Property to the west is zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre) and R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre). Property to the south is zoned C-G (General Commercial). The abutting property to the south is developed with a single-family residence. The abutting property to the north is vacant. Property on the west side of SW 87th Avenue is developed with a mix of single- family and multi-family residential uses. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 4 Site Information and Proposal Description: The approximately 37,967 square foot site fronts onto SW 87th Avenue and SW Hall Boulevard and contains a number of mature trees. The property slopes southeasterly from an elevation of approximately 179 feet to an elevation of approximately 168 feet. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence and construct a 6,480 square foot children's day care center on the southern half of the property. The proposed plan would allow approximately two feet of fill within the 100-year floodplain for the construction of a portion of a sidewalk. The proposal would also allow approximately 42 feet of excavation for a water quality facility. There will be no net rise of the 100-year floodplain as a result of this proposed cut and fill within the floodplain. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,480 square foot children's day care center. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Children's day care. Code Section 18.64.030 lists Children's day care as a permitted use in the C-P zone. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.64.050 states that the minimum lot size is 6,000 square feet and the minimum lot width is 50 feet in the C-P zone. Developments within the C- P zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant is proposing to develop the southern half of the property, with the remaining portion to remain undeveloped. The applicant's narrative states that the lot will consist of approximately 17% building area, 20% landscape and outdoor play area, 27% parking and driveway area, and 36% undeveloped land. The preliminary plan provides approximately 20% landscaping based upon the phased development of the property. Since the preliminary plan has been revised, a revised impervious surface/landscaping calculation shall be submitted that reflects the changes in the plan. Setbacks: Section 18.64.050 states that there are no setback requirements, except 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use within the district abuts a residential zoning district. The site does not abut a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet. The applicant is proposing a building of 20 feet, well under the maximum height allowed. Section 18.120.180(A)(1) (Site Development Review - Approval Standards) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters, 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 5 under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Code Section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The site is currently developed with a residential structure and contains a number of mature trees. An arborist report has been submitted which addresses preservation of trees on the property. In accordance with Section 18.150, trees greater than 12 inch caliper will be mitigated. The plan will also include new parking lot and street trees. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria shall be satisfied as addressed in the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130) section below. Section 18.120.180.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the preliminary site plans, screening of the parking area has been provided in accordance with this section. The applicant's revised plan (dated 8/13/96) made changes to the parking area. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted that provides screening of the revised parking lot. Pedestrian Pathway: Section 18.120.180.9 requires that where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. The pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan generally shows a proposed pathway following SW Hall Boulevard to extend south of SW Oak Street and beyond Highway 217. The proposed pathway generally follows the 100-year floodplain and City greenway system. The subject property is just north of the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street. The property contains one-half of a ten-foot pedestrian easement, created with the vacation of SW Mapleleaf Street in 1973. Requiring the dedication of land for the purposes of a pathway is not necessary given the existing easement on the property. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. This section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 6 is satisfied as the City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the plans and has offered no objections or comments. Chapter 18.84.015(B) states that the Director shall review minimal ground disturbances or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material; except in the floodway area. Chapter 18.84.040(A) states that the approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. The proposed plan (revised 8/13/96) and Engineer calculations show that there is no net fill in the 100-year floodplain. The plan shows that approximately 2 cubic yards of fill will be offset by approximately 42 cubic yards of excavated material. Since there is no net fill, there will be no increase in the level of the 100-year floodplain elevation. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this parcel is C-P (Professional Office). Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood. The proposed plan and Engineer Calculations show that there is no net fill in the 100-year floodplain. The plan shows that approximately 2 cubic yards of fill will be offset by approximately 42 cubic yards of excavated material. Since there is no net fill, there will be no increase in the level of the 100-year floodplain elevation. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearing Officer as untimely. The pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan generally shows a proposed pathway following SW Hall Boulevard to extend south of SW Oak Street and beyond Highway 217. The proposed pathway generally follows the 100-year floodplain and City greenway system. The subject property is just north of the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street. A pathway within this portion of the floodplain would not necessarily enhance the feasibility of the pathway system. Given the proximity to the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street, a pathway is not required of this property. Since the City now has a System Development Charge for pathway purchase and construction, dedication is not necessary. Required pathway areas will be purchased if in accordance with the City pedestrian pathway system. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 7 The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. This criteria is not applicable as a pathway will not be constructed in conjunction with this application. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. The applicant shall obtain the necessary, applicable permits from the Division of State Lands and Army Corps of Engineers or documentation that such permits are not required. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. When the City seeks to acquire a real property interest through the development approval process it must insure that the extent of the requirement is roughly proportional to the impact caused by that development. In this case, the applicant has shown that there will be no adverse impact on the 100-year floodplain elevation by providing greater cut than proposed fill in the floodplain. There is little evidence in the record to support the finding that a dedication for drainage and floodplain purposes is roughly proportional to the impact caused by the proposed cut and fill. Since the City now has a System Development Charge for pathway purchase and construction, dedication is not necessary. Required pathway areas will be purchased if they are in accordance with the City pedestrian pathway system. Also, as previously discussed, dedication for pathway purposes in not necessary given the existing pedestrian easement on the property. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement is satisfied as the applicant has submitted a landscape plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed plan partially complies with this criteria. The preliminary plan shows the provision of five (5) Capitol Flowering Pear trees on SW Hall Boulevard, spaced 25 feet on center, partially satisfying this criteria. A revised plan has been submitted which develops the majority of the frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. Street trees shall therefore, be planted along the entire length of SW Hall Boulevard. Street trees have also not been provided along SW 87th Avenue. A revised site plan shall be submitted that provides street trees along the entire length of SW Hall Boulevard as well as along SW 87th Avenue, in accordance with this section. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 8 landscape islands shall be three (3) feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed plan partially complies with this criteria. Screening has been provided around the perimeter of the parking area, as shown on the preliminary plan. Given the plans revision to remove the parking area from the floodplain, a revised landscape plan shall be provided that provides parking lot trees, planted in landscaped islands, at each end of the row of parking, in order to provide a canopy effect and screening around the perimeter of the revised parking area. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential structure, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. Section 18.100.080(D) states that the minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1.) At least one (1) row of trees shall be planted. They shall be; not less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous trees and five (5) feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2.) In addition, at least 10, five-gallon shrubs or; 20, one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3.) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover, or spread with bark mulch. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.100.080(E) states that where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1.) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (4) foot continuous screen within two (2) years of planting, or; 2.) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that will form a continuous screen six (6) feet in height within two (2) years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or bark mulch, or; 3.) A five (5) foot or taller fence, or wall, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The adjoining property to the south contains a single family residence. Therefore, a 20-foot buffer and screening area is required. This buffer area contains approximately 3,000 square feet. Therefore, the buffer shall contain 30, five-gallon; or 60, one-gallon shrubs in addition to the one (1) row of trees. As indicated on the site plan, screening has not been provided within the buffer area. Section 18.100.070.0 states that in lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides for buffering and screening in accordance with these standards. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 9 intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3), and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The proposed plan does not comply with the vision clearance criteria. A corner of the proposed building is within the vision clearance area on the south side of the driveway. On the north side of the driveway, it appears that the grade of the driveway is below the grade of the area to remain undeveloped. The applicant shall provide details of the grades within the vision clearance area to determine compliance with this section. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(B)(3) requires a minimum of five (5) parking space plus one (1) per classroom for Children's day care. The proposed floor plan (sheet 2 of 9) shows seven (7) classrooms. The number of parking spaces required is 12 spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 18 parking spaces, satisfying this section. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires one (1) disabled parking spaces if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. This section is satisfied as the proposed site plan shows the provision of one (1) disabled person parking space. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. One bicycle parking space will be required for this development. The proposed plan does not show the provision of a bicycle parking space. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides for one (1) bicycle parking space. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one access drive with a driveway width of 24 feet, thereby, satisfying this requirement. This driveway provides access to SW 87th Avenue. SW Hall Boulevard is designated as an arterial on the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. Code section 18.108.060(B) states that direct access to major collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. Since SW 87th Avenue is classified as a local street and there are no prohibitions regarding access to SW 87th Avenue in the Comprehensive Plan or Metzger-Progress Community Plan, the proposed driveway is acceptable. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 10 Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The plan shows a pedestrian connection to SW 87th Avenue and SW Hall Boulevard, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Signs: Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P zone. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Service Technicians. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The arborist report (dated 7/2/96) and plan identifies the type and size of the trees on the property. This report identifies thirteen trees greater than 12-inch caliper in size. Section 18.150.025.B.2(b) states that retainage of 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D. The proposed plan will preserve four trees (30%) greater than 12-inch caliper, with a total of 243 caliper inches. Therefore, a mitigation plan shall be submitted that provides mitigation of 160 caliper inches. The arborist report was prior to the revised plan (dated 8/13/96) and therefore, does not reflect the potential to preserve tree #7, a 40 inch Oak tree. Retainage of this tree will reduce the total number of caliper inches to approximately 133 caliper inches. The applicant may wish to consult with the arborist regarding this tree and submit a revised report and mitigation plan. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 11 STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard and SW 87th Avenue. Hall Boulevard is classified as an arterial street and is under ODOT jurisdiction. Right-of-way (ROW) standards for this roadway call for a total of 90 feet (45 feet from centerline). Existing ROW adjacent to this site is 40 feet from centerline. The applicant will be required to dedicate additional ROW along Hall Boulevard to provide the required 45 feet from centerline. Hall Boulevard is currently improved in this area with curb and sidewalk. No additional improvements are required. SW 87th Avenue is classified as a local commercial and industrial street which requires a total ROW width of 50 feet. The existing ROW width adjacent to this site is adequate. No additional dedications are required. The roadway is currently paved for two-lane traffic, but the condition of the existing pavement is questionable and likely does not meet City standards for structural section. In order to mitigate the additional traffic impact from this development, the applicant should be required to construct a half-street improvement adjacent to the site frontage. The local commercial and industrial street standard calls for 17 feet of pavement from curb to centerline and a 5-foot sidewalk. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 87th Avenue that is available to serve this site. The applicant's plans indicate that a new service lateral will be extended to the site from the main line. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site will flow to the southeast corner of the property where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility. From there, the storm water is proposed to be discharged into an existing catch basin in Hall Boulevard. ODOT will need to review and approve of the final design for this connection and will likely require on-site detention of the storm water, as well as treatment. The applicant should prepare engineering calculations for the storm drainage system and submit to ODOT as soon as practical to avoid delays in the review process. The City will not release a building permit for this project until ODOT has approved of the storm drainage connection. Copies of the calculations should also be submitted to Brian Rager, in the City's Engineering Department. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 12 method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant is proposing to install an on-site water quality pond to treat the storm water before being discharged into the public system. As of the writing of these comments, Staff was unable to determine if the proposed pond will be large enough to adequately serve the site because preliminary sizing calculations were not provided. However, this site is large enough to allow adjustments in the size of the pond if necessary. As was stated in the previous section, ODOT may require on-site detention of storm water also. If this occurs, the proposed pond could be designed and sized to provide both treatment of the summer events and detention of winter flows. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant is proposing some limited grading activity within the 100-year flood plain which is located at or below the 169-foot elevation. It appears that the grading will result in a net removal of material in the flood plain and therefore, no net fill. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant will need to provide engineered calculations indicating the volume of grading to take place within the flood plain and a statement from an engineer as to whether or not the grading activity will adversely impact the conveyance ability of the flood plain. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department, Maintenance Services, and Building Division have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this proposal and states that hydraulic review will be required before storm drain connection to ODOT's system. Permits will be required for any work done in ODOT right-of-way. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this proposal and states that hydrants and access are acceptable. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 13 Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed this proposal and states 1'1/2" and larger water meters are required to have double check following except high hazard may require reduced pressure principle type backflow preventer. Unified Sewerage Agency and PGE have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 11, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 11, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW/Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. Gl/�CJCv August 26, 1996 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner August 26, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\CURP L N\PATTY\SDR96-12.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 -LEARNING TREE DAYCARE Page 14 Is 0 )- z—.< < — /So L. L , L\/b. a 4'' lu' e. •ELS--I-8.3i' -a-.....1-12'.31• - it_.a ..r 5. scam£--T."-, as I t 1 I r .5- .4 -1,1'2, , a -7 to -A. d IL 19 L -14 Ib IN ii:h1 , -' L +, 7 1L W J It z 7--� ; - Q . Ib a i N I P'.d.YA2124 _- % u4eo S-F 3E ° _ a CC il i r7( I ToS6.E eel-cvect O � 7 ois 1 NYDe...ur -r is F- 1 U PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP SIB 96-0014 learning Tree Day Care Cntr. . I 1110 . . ' 410 Hi / / ///ST _, ,,c, ' I / I /(ii - N ,_, LANDAU ! I 111 t "~, Ili ' ` ST —�\ I [• c� LOCUSI� °Q - a, 1 ( ' , ___ST w Q Q • ' ; ' . MAPLELEA 1 RC 1 = - > 1 C V 1 E i 09 - - . C ' CU 9' ) OAK i0 . / I— al CO 1 PINE ST PINE 4._i I l i 0 F. 'U RUCE ST SRRUCE , . _________. —T.- )-1---------t' : __j . vicinity Map A SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care Cntr. lairilelmilmeie ()) , Iofa) CDR qc,-a9/4 i1 ii19T,ee_Da_ Ca,rtCnt1r 1S135AA-01901 1S135AA-01400 ASCHENBRENNER, STEVEN L BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 5425 SW LOMBARD 2900 SW GREENBERG RD BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97223 • 1S135AA-01900 1S135AA-90001 BOOTH,JOICE GOSSETT BROUSE,WANDA JANE AND 10250 SW 87TH AVE PETTY,JOHN A PORTLAND,OR 97223 10301 SW 87TH TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 1S135AA-01800 CAIN, JAMES L CHAVEZ, HELEN W 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD 8407 SW LOCUST SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 1S135AA-90007 CHRISTENSEN,JACK L AND NANCY CONNET,CARLEE SUE 8805 SW OAK ST 10313 SW 87TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90004 1S135AD-01200 CONSER, JEAN H AND CROUCH,THELMA C ESTATE HURST, JOSEPHINE c/o DAVIS EUGENE L AND VIVIAN 10307 SW 87TH#4 BY ROBERT SAIZ,CPA TIGARD,OR 97223 12753 SW 68TH PKWY STE 220 TIGARD CR 97224 1S135AA-03702 1S135AA-90000 CULLINAN, RANDY J AND DEODAR CONDOMIN KRISTINA G OWNERS S 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00590 1S135AA-00500 EIDENSCHINK, IRMA EIDENSCHINK, IRMA 8740 SW LOCUST DRIVE 8740 SW LOC E PORTLAND,OR 97223 P D,OR 97223 1S135AA-03700 1S135AA-02700 ELLIOTT,THOMAS G&MARIA T HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 9380 SW 82ND#2 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 SUITE 104 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-90002 1S135AA-02801 HAWLEY, HAZEL M HIRNING, DOROTHY AND 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 SARGEANT, SHARON PORTLAND,OR 97223 6325 SW 90TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-03707 1S135AA-90005 HITCH, DORIS LAIRD,SHAWN W&LOUISE M PO BOX 35 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE BEAVERTON,OR 97075 PORTLAND,OR 97223 5!7k -ON 4 Lzfa,y7 -- 7-i-ee Dag C-Q4,17 1S135AA-02500 1S135AA-02100 LYON, DONALD J HAZEL J NORTHLAND HOMES INC 10440 SW 87TH AVE 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 • 1S135AA-01500 1S135AA-02600 PEPPER, MURRAY TR& PETERSON,THEODORE S AND PEPPER, JAMES ET AL DEAN,VIRGINIA J BY BANK OF AMERICA OREGON 8686 SW OAK PO BOX 6400-UNIT#2814 TIGARD,OR 97223 PCRLTANJ CR 97228 1S135AA-02000 1S135AA-03705 PRUNK,WILLIAM H ROMERO, MERCEDES G AND STEIGER, JOHN M MOLINA,MARTHA A 301 NW MURRAY BLVD 10385 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90003 1S135AA•90006 SHERWOOD, SYDNEY L TAYLOR,J EDWARD AND 10305 SW 87TH NEWSOME-TAYLOR, PHYLLIS M TIGARD,OR 97223 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-03704 GARY KAUFMAN WILLIAMS. RODNEY G 3622 ELDORADO LOOP S. 10455 SW 87TH AVE SALEM OR 97302 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 R E C E s Notice TT 8 613 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising EP 04 1996 CITY OF TIGARD 'City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 'Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 'Accounts Payable • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)96-0014/ SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR)96-0004 >LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER< The Director has approved, subject to conditions, request for Site AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Development Review approval to allow the construction of an ap- proximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center.The proposal in- STATE OF OREGON, ) eludes approximately 2 cubic yards of fill and 42 cubic yards of excava- COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. tion in the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 10360 S.W. 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW I. Kathy Snyder CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard—T ual a i n T,imes 18.164. ZONE: C-P(Professional Commercial).The Professional Corn- a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 mercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public and 193.020; published at Ti gard in the support facilities,professional services, financial, insurance,real estate aforesaid county and state; that the services, business support services, and multi-family residential uses, SDP96-0014 Learning Tree lay ('are among others. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the I �--� .17---- I I ;-� entire issue of said newspaper for ()NF. successive and I l l l 5f /j consecutive in the following issues: t.woyw August 29,1996 j2=1:7 "114111111111111111/111' 71 sT =� 1111 1 Krn A.6 _ 4 Ail i . MIN � �r r ..r, Subscribed and sworn t efore me this 29th day of Augusts ,1 I :"' „04-, a 8 Notary lic or Oregon r , ■ 5111 My Commission Expires: o _�1 AFFIDAVIT • -- . :ii • III 11-- I L gli 1 III ill PINE Sr — [ 1 H ri - FIE ---------T--r, 1111-1 ; 1---- ,irwur-v- I--r1,----) 1 i i I 11' " The adopted finding of facts,decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on Septem- ber 11, 1996.Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accor- dance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Com- munity Development Code,which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M., September 11, 1996. TT8613—Publish August 29, 1996. '11 Ci TY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF CANCELLATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY. AUGUST 26, 1996 AT 7:00 PM, HAS BEEN CANCELED FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0004 'iLE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PLICANT: Gary Kaufman OWNER: John Steiger 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Salem, OR 97302 Portland, OR 97229 REQUEST > The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. Also requested was a Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow fill within the 100-year floodplain. THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THE PROPOSAL SUCH THAT THERE WILL BE NO NET FILL WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. THE REVISED PLAN WILL PLACE A PORTION OF A SIDEWALK WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN BUT ALSO PROVIDES FOR REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 40 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL. GIVEN THE CHANGE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN, THERE WILL BE NO NET RISE IN THE LEVEL OF THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. SINCE THERE IS LESS THAN 50 CUBIC YARDS OF EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN, THE CITY DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES ONLY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AND NO PUBLIC HEARING. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). --\PPLICABLE EVIEW Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, RITERIA: 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. 'ONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. A NOTICE OF DECISION SHALL BE MAILED ON THURSDAY AUGUST 29, 1996 REGARDING THE APPLICANT'S REVISED PLAN. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. iii I I i 7( 1 i g LANDAU ur }, iii ST \_ A 1 C I \ I - g I ' LOCUST - y 9 ` CO / - - 0- ST r - , W Q 11 MAPLELEA 4404!#-R 1 -- ---F - 1 l . .... E i 1_ ..____________ ,.._ . c .t• Lc, CO / ST OAK a. / _ OAK __III Imo ill n CO CD Min 1.. . PINE ST PINE �. 1 o 7 7 U .'R CE ST in SRRUCE Vicinity Map SDR 96-0014 Learning Tree Day Care Cntr. N , CITY OF TIGARD "�`' 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. `�7 Tigard,Oregon 97223 \� ,` �� e too iv rIA., • -4 N\ • ,, 00 is, . .,(c o �0.)ff- � \ . 4 1 S 135AA-03704 WILLIAMS,RODNEY G 10455 SW 87TH/ TIGARD,OR 97 WILL455'< 972233005 1415 08/31/96 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND WILLIAMS 1588 NE 19T1-1 LOOP CANSY OR 97013-2450 RETURN TO SENDER 11111111 Ilsellesilmil nIIuIII II,IInIInIIIInI CITY OF TIGARD c'')r (,k`V 13125 S.W. Hall NS6L 'iC Tigard,Oregon 97223 C0 WE ED PUNNNG 4\i' 4_)■, [._, Q . , ' 0,. C") Acot ..),k orq 4)v 1S135AA-03704 WILLIAMS.ROONEY G 10455 SW 97TH A'- TIGARO'OR 972 WILL'455R 9722 :9008 1'495 08/29/96 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND WILLIAMS 1588 NE 19TW LOOP CANBY OR 97013-21450 RETURN TO SENDER 111.11.fld nIIIIIluIIInilIIIl,I Hilu,IIuIIlnII CITY OF TIGARD 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 AUG-5'96 1;�-:%/i,,i. .A�SIt�1•1_ d, }'. F=S:. 3 2 ,x 7 - I S 1 ' 1S135AA-0370 WILLIAMS,RODNEY G 1045551/1."'"'”^*- TIGARD,( WILL455+'< 972232003 1495 08/07/98 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND WILLIAMS 1588 NE 19TH LOOP _ CANL3Y OR 97013-2450 RETURN TO SENDER 19't2.2.5-N. Erc IItlo.II IInIIIIIIiisII.nIIiiiIl AU. -411 CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 26. 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0004 -!LE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PPLICANT: Gary Kaufman OWNER: John Steiger 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Salem, OR 97302 Portland, OR 97229 REQUEST - The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. Also requested is Sensitive Lands Review approval to allow fill within the 100- year floodplain. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.84.040, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. - THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED _BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR 503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR O THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. 3DR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESEN— WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS F ")POSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE . sLIC HEARING. 'ORA:TESTIMONY _ AY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER AUGUST 5, 1996. ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER WILLIAM D'ANDREA AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. t i t , I I ( l __lows,. ..„4„,„ 1, _f_l - -__J __1.1 . LOCUS i El t 41 1 1 1 ^ ' I;, nnAaLELEa ;R ). I _, 0,, -7 )7 / 1 1 FINE ST ► l I — II sTE I 1 I 11 t i s SDR 96-0014/SLR 96-0004 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING RECEIVED 57/40 z+�c. LIR 5Etrr 5/z8 inn? L'T!L SE+T 4/(e/9L SLR \E.1'1 SE trt 7 CAE /7/cam neetS'247V 47� 7lz<e C-r �N�E1� CA1L'S 1Ss S c��c y4eQS cue- -r:ii REV15E_b 174,4 'j�Ev tS Ed 'PLA O ( çi#c Fd 7/15) 51/c4.,.)5 it/0 NE7 A7// REVISEb 'PLAN $113 CREPLA LED S/ 7 / 4gle1titi6 6A7 MO Veto AECIStc, 4 offZCi PPEAK reo /1 /1--wic 401 60040/71 p e,N/7s P56 4 AR/h{/ C.r.7ePS Z C.v Fi!( l.�J Floc��/.P�/✓ LeTTi- FLCm DS I, lilt VtlE7l.AK) FGOal> La-T-1 f awl D5 C. 1014 Ca,-corn win-k Nr-le.71Ar4, DEI JEATtG1 J CLR'S LETTER 1011E REVLSE,D ?MN) )0/21 CT�Ec /1M17,O-47/on! nil✓ NEEOS `r-ca '73E_ S cO ZSM 17T,5 > APPLICANT MATERIALS a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. S- QJ C - 01/Q1 OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO.96-- G f, E APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: c-/w 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION /03 40 SG(L 3'7 74 1,---(A) Application form (1) Ty ak) Otte, I 1 r.(B) Owner's signature/written .7 TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. let f ' I 31,,at4„ 3P authorization DeEb /11 e Z. 4E'k �c.kr �ie4��s (C) Title transfer instrument (.1) ,/SITE SIZE /.2 •6 . 1 1 x l 9. 2 I 3 7, 94 7 4h...` 14,1. "a22cd _ -a l) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* Joh',, Srt10,, (E) Plot plan (pre-app Ig p pp checklist), ADDRESS 3p/ is (,t/ A./var2iv igL yi PHONE 493-S75 G (F) Applicant' s statement le CITY Po w4 Lay) Cj ti,vg ZIP 97 221 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* G Art y klAuPAIANJ ( roperty o mama- nd ADDRESS 3 J., /oe S. PHONE 3'10-,3 F0 9drarns o ith n 2 0 r__E c ) j CITY Sa Le At 014( ZIP 9 734 2 (H) Filing fee ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate `- people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record )r a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMARY The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow ,e0an,VlNy �k -, 7241 6_4 bt( Pd 6 / Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 II/ r. 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. (KSL:pm/052+?) • ,� �1�1 CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0014 FILE TITLE: LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER APPLICANT: Gary Kaufman OWNER: John Steiger 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 301 NW Murray Blvd. Salem, OR 97302 Portland, OR 97229 (503) 370-8390 (503) 643-5756 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of an approximately 6,460 square foot children's day care center. LOCATION: 10360 SW 87th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: C-P (Professional Commercial). The Professional Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, and multiple-family residential units, among others. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.64, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea (503) 639-4171 x315 SDR 96-0014 LEARNING TREE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ,A, CITY OF TIGARD May 28, 1996 OREGON Gary Kaufman 3622 Eldorado Loop S. Salem, OR 97302 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal Dear Mr. Kaufman: The Planning Division has conducted a preliminary review of SDR 96-0014, an application for Site Development Review, and have found that certain application materials were not provided with the submittal. The Planning Division is unable to consider the application complete and continue processing the application pending submission of the following items and plan notes: 1.) Existing Conditions Plan, Site Development Plan, Grading Plan, Architectural Drawings Plan, Landscape Plan, Tree Inventory, and Minor Land Partition Plan. (Enclosed is an example of a set of plans that would be acceptable for Site Development Review submittal.) 2.) Owner signature of the application form, or written authorization from the property owner. Documentation of property ownership (deed). ?EC E v ED If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, Will D'Andrea Assistant Planner i:\curpin\will\sdr96-14.1tr c. SDR 96-0014 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON June 6, 1996 Gary Kaufman 3622 Eldorado Loop S. Salem, OR 97302 Re: Notice of Complete Submittal Dear Mr. Kaufman: This letter is to inform you that your application (SDR 96-0014) is considered complete and has been accepted by the Planning Division. if you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, 41.u D c Will D'Andrea Assistant Planner i lcu rp l n\wi i i\sd r96-14.1 t2 c. SDR 96-0014 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tiard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT DATE: 5-15-96 SITE: 10360 SW 87th Avenue Tigard, Oregon APPLICANT: Gary Kaufman Kaufman Homes. Inc. 1295 Baxter Rd. SE Salem, Oregon 97306 Kaufman Homes, Inc. proposes to build a 6480 sf daycare center at 10360 S.W. 87th Ave., Tigard, Oregon. The building, parking and play ground is located on the south end of the property, leaving approximately 13,500 sf on the north end for future development. The placement of the daycare was designed for a visual exposure to Hall Blvd. and to take advantage of a sunny south exposure of the play area. The lot will consist of approximately 17% building area, 20% landscape and outdoor play area, 27% parking and driveway area and 36% undeveloped land. The building will be of wood frame construction on a concrete slab with a trussed roof. Access to the daycare will be off S.W. 87th Avenue. The east side of the street will be improved by increasing the width to the centerline of the street to 16'-0". A curb and 5'0" sidewalk will be installed along the length of the property. There will be no vehicular access off S.W. Hall Blvd. and no street improvements are proposed. The S.E. corner of the property is located within a 100 year flood plain. The ground elevation is raised up approximately 12" - 18" in the parking and playground areas of the flood plain. ( Flood plain elevations are below 170.00'). The lowest point of the flood plain is designed as a 450 sf. phosphate filtering pond. Parking, driveway and rain drains flow into a new catch basin in the center of the parking lot, this water is then filtered through the grass in the pond and exits out to an existing catch basin on Hall Blvd. The storm water is then diverted to a creek approximately 200 yards south along Hall Blvd. Storm water from the street and sidewalk along S.W. 87th Ave. flows into a catch basin on the south end of the street and is then diverted across the road into a ditch. A new 1-1/2" water meter will to be placed of the west side of the building in the vicinity of the existing fire hydrant. A 4" sanitary sewer line is connected from west (back) side of the building to an existing 8" line along S.W. 87th Ave. Handicap parking with access ramp is located on the south end of the parking lot. The ramp goes along the play area and inclines at a rate of 5%. Because of the necessity for a step at the main entrance, the handicap entrance is located at the first door on the north side of the building. Existing trees are to remain as much as possible on the lot and a arborist plan will be designed by William L. Owen and Associates, P.O. Box 641, Portland, Oregon, 97207, (503)656-2656. The 5000 sf play area will be contained by a chain link fence. There will be landscaping in this area to screen off the existing garage and lean-to along the south property line and to soften the look of the fence. Also, landscaping will be used to screen the parking lot from Hall. Blvd. Since all sides of the daycare are quite visible, landscaping will be designed and maintained in order to create a pleasing visual from wherever it is being viewed. JOHN M. STEIGER WILLIAM H. PRUNK 301 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND, OREGON 97229 503-643-5756 FAX 503-626-0621 May 1, 1996 Will D'Andrea City Of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Lot 1, Block 38, Metzger Acre Tracts, commonly known as 10360 SW 87th St. Dear Mr. D'Andrea: Please accept this letter as our authorization for Gary Kaufman and his representatives and the City Of Tigard to proceed with the necessary steps to enable Gary Kaufman to obtain permits and approvals to build on the subject property. We have also enclosed a deed of record showing John M. Steiger and William H. Prunk to be the legal owners of the subject parcel. Title to the property is scheduled to be conveyed to Gary Kaufman on June 1, 1996 If you have any questions, please call me at 643-5756. Yours truly, John M. Steiger enc MRIX MYDIR\TIGARD.LTR •7J • t % 800220_8_6 d O WARRANTY DEED—STATUTORY FORM _ INDIVIDUAL GRANTOR ■ Clarence Earnest Dalthorp and Gertrude H. Dalthorp .. conveys and warrants to .. _--William H. Prunk and John M. Steiger Grantor, nl Grantee, the following described real property (� free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County, Oregon, to-wit: IN Lot 1, Block 38, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, Oregon, TOGETHER WITH that portion of SW Mapleleaf that inurred to the said lot upon vacation by Ordinance No. 78-182. Q assessments of Unified Sewerage Subject to: Statutory powers and s g � .°-: Agency; Easements for utilities, Vacation Ordinance No. 78-182. n a) o E r, l DOCUMENTARY a) t IIF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINU' •0_ _ OREGON CUUIY TAX (' U The said property is free from encumbrances except 0 * I. 00 era Pfj JUN24'80 c 10869 , 1 — The true consideration for this conveyance is$ 111,0 0 0.0 0 (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030) - 23rd June 80 Dated this of , 19. . . _.. „e, .40 , -.,;-,Novs.- )e,-.47-9 ,_ .e& -,e---,6-./6-- f_, „:"(.0a - ' 1 a - , if, - ' --er -- STATE OF OREGON, County of Washington )ss. June 23 1980 Personally appeared the above named Clarence Earnest Dalthorp and Gergrude H. Dalthorp and acknowledged the forego' g instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Before me: d i � . . , i,...0 L•L�la--ef-- � . (OFFICIAL SEAL) Notary Public for -regon—My commission expires: -. 7_31-82 •• Clarence Earnest Dalthorp et STATE OF OREGON l]X _ .-�/ 1} L/,/u / County of Washington SS �fi I, Roger Thomssen, Director of Records and Elections and Ex-Officio Recorder of Con- After for said county, do hereby certify that Afrer recording return to: the within instrument of writing was received William H. Prunk & John M. and recorded in book of records of said county. Steiger se ROGER THOMSSEN, Director of 8959 SW Barbur Blvd. �� Records& Elections 2ortland,Oregon 97219 C Y NAME.ADDRESS.ZIP Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the following address; Same -as--above. IND�Y:�7 1988 Mt 24 r 9: 59 NAME.ADDRESS.ZiP F.9558 --1 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS iLL Irr FOR WPSHINGTON COUNTY, GREG& • 1'I:CrTS'& tLk�C1iUiIS In the Matter of the Vacation of a portion ) C1F.SIIIIICIGN:000'll'f of S.W. Mapleleaf Street in Section 35, R1S,) RESOLUTION AND ORDER R1W, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon, Pursuant to ORS 271.020 (1) . Vacation No. ) NO. 7Af-1 180. ) This matter having come on regularly before the Board at its meeting of July 25, 1978; and It appearing to the Board that a petition has been filed for the vacation of a portion of S.W. Mapleleaf Street in Section 35, T1S, R1W, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon, and that said petition has been signed by all persons owning property immediately adjoining the portions of said streets to be vacated, pursuant to ORS 271.020 (1) ; and It appearing to the Board that the road to be vacated is not within the corporate limits of any city or town; and It appearing to the Board that the only parties that would be particularly affected by the said vacation are the petitioners who own all the land adjacent to and affected by the said proposed vacation; and It appearing to the Board that said petition did describe the portion of the street to be vacated, the names of the parties to be particularly affected thereby, and set forth the particular circumstances of the case; and it appearing further that notice of the pendency of said petition was given by written notice being posted more than thirty days prior to the date of the hearing said notices being posted in three of the most public and conspicuous places within the limits of said road, as shown by the affidavit on file herein; and It appearing to the Board that the notice contained a description of the portion of said streets to be vacated and gave the date of July 25, 1978, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. as the time, and Room 402 of the Washington County Administration Building, Hillsboro, Oregon, as the place for hearing the matter and remonstrances thereto and no remonstrances having been made; it is, therefore RESOLVED AND ORDERED that that portion of S.W. Mapleleaf Street described as follows: All that portion of Maple Street (S.W. Mapleleaf Street) in Section 35, T1S, R1W, W.M., Washington County, Oregon, dedicated to the public in the duly recorded plat of "Metzger Acre Tracts" , lying westerly of the westerly right-of-way line of First Street (S.W. Hall Boulevard) , as shown on said plat. be and hereby is, vacated, reserving thorofrom a 10.0 foot wide easement for pedestrian 4 PACE 93 1 . - _ • ' „ said easement to be S.0 feet wide on each side of the centerline of said street; .Ad it is further • RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County Surveyor of Washington County, Oregon/ be, and hereby is, authorized and directed to mark said street as vacated on the plats and records of Washington County, Oregon; and it is further RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Director of Finance and Administration of Washington county, Oregon, is hereby authorized and directed to collect from petitioners herein, the required statutory fees for payment to the Surveyor as Surveyor's Fees and payment to the Recorder as Recorder's Fees and have this order of vacation recorded in ; the records of Washington County, Oregon. DATED this 25th day of July, 1978. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON • Chairman 5 Votes aye c,) )• ,cording Secrp`ary AP7 V,E AAS TO FORM Asw��l.vrl 0..11111).%:1)11111101 r Walk inCJ fl C.••tflW.Clrrtann • • • Page 2, MO No. bnOK 4 pha 94 Vacation No. 100 I • WAzHINGTON CONTY . t �v Inter-Department Correspondence 14)1 Duo July 12, 1978 For Meeting of: July 25, 1978 To Honorable Board of County Commissioners From Director of Public Works ift..--.....°'-- Subject PUBLIC HEARING: Vacation No. 180 (S.W. Mapleleaf Street) The subject vacation was initiated on.April 17, 1978, by the filing of a petition as required by ORS 271.020 (1) . The normal procedure for • • dedicated street vacations was than begun, and our findings relative to the subject vacation are as follows: 1) A valid petition meeting all requirements set forth in ORS 271.020(1) has been received. 2) The proposed vacation consists of a portion of S.W. Mapleleaf Street, dedicated to the public by "Metzger Acre Tracts", in Section 35, T1S, R1W, W.M. (see attached map) . 3) The petition was circulated to all concerned county • departments and utility companies, and all responses indicate approval, providing a pedestrian easement is reserved along • the center of the street. 4) The street proposed to be vacated is a dedicated street • lying within the unincorporated area of the county. RECOMMENDATION: Your Board, based.on the above findings, adopt the _ • prepared Resolution and Ord '*vacating the subject portion of S.W. Mapleleaf Street, rerving the middle 10 -feet of said street for pedestrian use, at the close of the Public Hearing. Res ctfu y s s ed, . r-;;?: ?i15.. '"//4?7'/'' y .'14%w . JFC:ja '/ Attachment - map / 4.,- ....-:.,.'4--. cliored f //4h9)C A w 92nd Avp-1 4., .0. -.4,c: 1 il /1 , . grim -,.. ..e. _ .; �• � �l . ; 1-- - �� / M ' i GTE Tern. —ckPo, . 1 - J. . 1. . ,.. - • • ! -ibte,NA 1 "—I 1 alb/ �4 - - L- ._ —_ v, .. °. - •,0 • \Q I J \ \ S.W. ; : 90 th. AVENUE - r .. 4 I .. - 1 - . r- t....T - _- I • j 1 \ ' - —.1 -- � . -.1 _ -S.W. 1 �O..n►1 • b„, __ .. . —....-.—..-- .-.■...........—• 1 %.. . rLLC riMr47°a nj till‘°r7.17 t t - 7 - I 1 - - • - - —4 I Cp I r \ N. •t*--e - (xi - d' [u _a k1 • s - �1_ _ _ -- .f`°' V D \' fit ' % • • \ O' •• t'EFFERS I .c% .6 7/pro . '' I i :or `� N , , . v � � .. t /fE 1 -- - �. Ai i_ w % �rn 3RAHI`M D.L.C. 52 L ' - - + f' I , . OMB - ` �'` \,. Tr.m•'/OV4 S.W. 87th AVENUE :w:74-=1,7--, ..S, ' 0G-' i C. K. wlc,�(-)u.. E1Gg,q+'/0 . 1 i r om 1 'n ' O w U' - • N.)co 171 ' X .N. \ .- . %.*L . . : ;aunty Rood Nu. 116C • -- S.W. - HALL BOULEVARD ._ . --. • IW s. a;. SA m I j, i 1 II .m .i... I le 41 U) I 23 m .n /0' � ct,e7 Q2,-05 1)07,1- /o& ta- eir7/ fver/ ter- 4•10 / i 3 d A v`"" . +t' 56 Lam—°/ 11 ,- 0,25944/ 4-Aod----(10--- 4--ok( _ 1 # gi . .. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) I, Gary Kaufman , being duly sworn, depose and say that on February 21, 1996 19,96 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 10360 S.W. 87th Street, Tigard, Oregon , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Main Branch PDX. , with postage prepaid thereon. le AO Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6 day of >>r lA• . 19 Q Co . I OFFICIAL SEAL ! WENDY LAUDETTE Ii Y / NOT ARY PUBLIC-OREGON \4Q IC.,..:-:i- . COMVisPsION 20.029880 " ) c MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.23:1297 I Notary Public JJJ My Commission Expires: \\(2,7)1111 h:\login\jo\aiimaii.cit HOMES INC. Gary Kaufman Dean Kaufman Duane Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE • Salem, Oregon 97306 • Phone: (503)370-8390 • Fax: (503)370-2731 February 21, 1996 RE: MR. GARY KAUFMAN Dear Interested Party: I am representing the owner of the property located at 10360 S.W. 87th Street, Tigard, Oregon, 97223 as outlined on the attached plat map I am considering proposing that a children's day school be constructed at this location. However, prior to applying to the city of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: When: Thursday, March 7th,1996 Where: Two Lincoln Center South,Second Floor Conference Room 10220 S.W. Greenburg Road, Portland, Oregon 97223 (See attached map for directions) Time: 6:00 p.m.— 7:30 p.m. Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 1—(503)- 370-8390 if you have any questions. Sincer , Murray Pepper Irma Eidenschink 1 - BESLEY PROPERTIES INC James Pepper 8740 SW Locust St 2900 SW Greenberg Rd PO Box 6400-Unit #2814 Portland, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97228 N Patricia Fries Laszlo & Iren Szalvay Helen Chavez 10225 SW 85th Ave 14950 SW 144th Ave 8407 SW Locust St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97223 - ; Joice Gossett Booth ' Steven Aschenbrenner 1 Donald Pollock 10250 SW 87th Ave 5425 SW Lombard Ave 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Portland, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97005 Portland, OR 97221 Robert Donna Jensen Robert Harding )4 Carl Lee 10375 SW 85th Ave 4130 SW Alice St 8505 SW Oak St Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97219 Tigard, OR 97223 James Cain Clifford Bacigalupi Jr. 17350 SW Scholls Y Donald Hazel Lyon 10405 SW 85th Ave Sherwood Rd 10440 SW 87th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Sherwood, OR 97140 Portland, OR 97223 Theodore Peterson �! Virginia Dean / HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC ' v Ira & Linda Price 8686 SW Oak St 2300 SW 1st Ave #104 6208 SW Southview St Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97219 4Dorothy Hirning Randy Cullinan Sharon Sargeant Jack & Nancy Christensen G Kristina 6325 SW 90th Ave 8805 SW Oak St 8775 SW Oak St Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Mercedes Romero Waldo Brandt & E Pearl Rodney Williams Martha Molina 8835 SW Oak St 10455 SW 87th Ave 10385 SW 87th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Gary Peschka Matt & Cindy Walp , Richard Taylor 8525 SW Oak St 10207 SW 85th Ave 10245 SW 85th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 11 Wanda Jane Brouse 'JJean Conser John Petty Sydney Sherwood Josephine Hurst 10301 SW 87th Ave 10305 SW 87th Ave 10307 SW 87th Ave #4 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 J Edward Taylor Shawn & Louise Laird Phyll Newsome-Taylor F Carlee Sue Connet ' 10309 SW 87th Ave 10311 SW 87th Ave 10313 SW 87th Ave Portland, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 X Mark & Deborah Goewey / Hazel Hawley h Mary Fletcher 10315 SW 87th Ave #8 9055 SW 91st Ave #7 16388 SW Estuary Dr #101 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97006 Michael Goldade & A Jane ' Doris Hitch ; James & Darlene Cain 8515 SW Oak St PO Box 35 14300 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97075 Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (C1T'S) NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH 1.:• CMS tOPOSALS • — WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE A muumn E •TRAL CIT, r Abdutlah a i Clar, S. Zeller Be etly Fr.ude " Mary Swintek lack L el tan ' Br • i 11 05 5 125 I1 Cowl 13 '0 'W Shore Drive 12.10 5 . Dull Moun ain Rd 9915 SW Frewing, 023 1552; S 1091h Ave 11! .5 • • P ,der ay Thar 1, 0' 97 3 TI: .rd, *1R 97223 Tlg.rd, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 I Tigarten, OR 97224 Ti .- d, •' 9 ' 3-3930 Iso •SN 1 •, Iso r l 099 U011 34.1 r 4' John eth Bll Gr• ki L.r y We Ierman Kat , m11 ' Craig Hopkins 1550 SW 109th Ave 111135 •W .3511 Avenue 1 165 5 Fern Street 116. 5 SW toad Curt 7430 SW Varns Street igard, O • 97224 ;:rd OR 972 .3 'i:+rd, O' 97223 Tlga • OR '7224 Tigard, OR 97223 11 11 •111 01 514 45S0 150116 4. 91 G i Kali • Ka l lo I illy H: r Lind Mast= s a 129 0 S Glach r lily Dr 1'116 5 Ironwood Loop 151 . 1 SW 41s1 A •nue Mark f. Mahon F TJg. <I, O 97 22_ I.Ord, ON 97223 TIga , OR '7224 11310 SW 91st Court " a p, 15011 45100- . 1 5701.97a1 •11634 1001 (70116 1 Tigard,7167 g r OR 97223 HEd ow ell :,rllara Sa Iler Scotia Russet — 1 Id •9 •W Mond/ g 1 till 245 SW Morgen Court 312' 1 Rayr end Cr=ek Road I Joel Stevens Ti: , •R 97223 hard, OR 97223 Scar) •use, PR 970.6 9660 SW Ventura our! i 52 A 40 I„ 166/-9101 4501]5 11414 Tigard, OR 97223 D ine & Om Roa 1 )1 e Sulffri Ige Cal , ooler ` ,1 1 .447 SW Tweke bury Or 1 949 SW 14616 Avenue 123'1, SW 32nd Co rt Pat Wyden • Tigard, OR 9722• Tigard, OR 97224 Tiga II, OR '•7223 B122 fSW Spruce Street I I- • 101}540041 15911540 0523 150115� 197 ' Tigard, OR 97223 N I- --r 2 NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings on Ian: "' use proposals In the West OT area shall be sent to all the names on this Ilst. N rurnowernroterra.rotic mot c or.1995 -r .--r f pages 1 co I Post-it.Fax dote 7671 Dale --7.1 a p w Co. , r Co/Dept. el Monett ti _4197/ �' Phone d .-, a 3 - --r/-r te Fax N . 1 7,- . , _ / ,;,. .v , ,,,747.,,,.,„ • �/ , 377/9 6 6.1 ,rA c_ A Y /G '/ ,( 70-72-44- G--A--4W- Lyr 5-'7a,2 A64.-1 Aso, /2,5,- . -,e,-., ;- .5,y '-d ,'? 977V * 02' /off c1� /70,62v. j , , Q7. 77�z3 64 t i ( t , I 4 . Al.cti4d. l 7� o - k -1 a ti a( IV. -54,& 0/ \ 7-°ue4t L. /IsC 4 art 1,t-.,rr-e.r. 5-4/,./s. 6:ce..? Lo max cc Ve,ge/e 411-0/( eye f 7045 , ice of A / 3G 2 Z 40), 4 n(4., no Z 4 t k.. ..10/(-- % /' r ?os,s s cv '%7` t'D 272-2-3 .J v (,t,,, De.Gr,„i Z.12 q/ S/)o.rkvieLv 4, ""11-0,.L.A o, 7 7( 3 ,mac 3-76 44»,tdri ,L .d(8 ??z� Nle A �G , 97((ok'(0 g7.-7 E • c, 790 S'u) 77 225 1 • 1 /I • . 'o* sf LW MN - __ - LJ I l I IN 9S0 A i j _ Y ._ _� I 1 1 • I q I I E1 i I 1 / *9 L9+OD .'_ 1, .� in a—ate.�._____ 1 1 1 E I I 1 703'92•I '£ OY NV I V 1H1 WI 1 *I ` I I IE i I I 1 I L II �o-- 1 co i ' - ' _- 1 OICv �^ I . . , I 1 �m 1 , 1 ' O I ' 1 ' a-01:. _i___ I O , �� I I , --L'r � �>� 1 I ` :4-( •S +Z 1V 104 -� -- - I , 1 I I I rw. II . 1 , . ._, i k / 1 •' 1 1 I I I' + 1 1 . P ` 7 ut El LI ...I Al-- I -- S_'! _ 1 - i 1 I eZCCI;:i 1 I I 1 \ . s____ _--_�� i �_ ; r 7"6 V OI'i9+i9'd '1Nt IN 1 _� ' -- 1 ...)._ 1 1 I1 ' I - ---1 a'I.iF.s�.Qa?G 1 is 01 Z9 X69 'Y 1N1 MN . I iiii' '' 1Sj 31dv T s I 11 I ii+' I I EZ201 ' I 701 it I--- I s—i_�� 1 HI +_ i ( ice/ �� I I x ❑� >� ; t. I I I it - ;, t I / 1 1 I ' I _ ` 05201 ' I < ->f�'r' —� _ Y=�' J ` I 1 Al -- 4 �1 I iii 1 ' d all! I I I / 1tT '"103 c Z tom, /01 ii ,/ �� F_74-- \ .1.0,v4.41 } 1 �__-- --�- I I ° 1 0 a19ii� I f�II I M 0 1 1 O�� 4. Oo I ' 1 / ' o 1 \1 t> ' .1 / ' I OZ76 °O� 9x 'O. ' i I �1 1'I -.-r-_ �) i I 1- I oF� Fib I I I , i/ I r I t--....--V l a---\---- \__. . __IIppk._. _ _ IM' 1 • — — 1 OLD(► :/ I .1 ICI 1 00+0 *Olti WI z •50•69.V1.11 I 1I ' c,•c•c'cdFN► 4 /' \ 11 I i \I 'f. I i rf\ /' ° • Wills! 1 S fl :) O 'll 1 M g ; I I \� F• • ---i i . L 1, L / b. ((�� IZ�Z. EiY.'b. i� i Perm IbI.E, ZO(o' • £ t'11.31� _ \ _ • ELE• f(43.31' ILAIJaSc 6..PE ____...1 Z 3 4 S' 1 "I b I Iv ti 1 IN _ ' . I - i k )r `II Lc I 14,- 15 u. 1 / 1 � - / 7 -I . 1 i S. L N. Y _ W _ 1 d I P:.I.YA.P..EA I- 111 :. S►:27 SF o ' ,,1.! PIS-oPO p W - G�o.Y%—E t. L 3 ft ; I sT'Ca 1-lot1` 1 If, To sE eo- t1 • I 1 "13' ZA- _ 6-0' : F M' x 1 = r, - fi• , I ••• r'd Kie Z OCo t HYDe�14r LoT I I . 3:GGC-38, M E7Z EIG '.G EE -Z/.G71 Ts.! L-C: ?BOG - LIE '/A-, 5 3S, T IS, a I W Li i.),..-Ni-1 ItJ( ;O►J GoJ t lT ' DR... I { rr ll tt I I I I ii' II III III ST --__________ /_ , ---- ti)6- ,,,..,. 1 4iiiimin Lisa i 9 I35AA-00500 1 S135AA 01400 "-I �135AA 01500 I , 1�35M-01900 K. 1 S135AA 00590 1 S135AA 01901 1 S135AA 0180C 1 S135M-•1007 1 Si 35AA-000o3 C 1S^3�3AA9r:� � : 90 ! ■C 1 S13 5A 90000 1 ?5 w-9000 S135AA 02000 1 S135AA 0210C - cu 1 S135AA 0374735AA 037C 500 1-. 17210 1 S135AA-037 D4 'S135AA 025 1 S135AA 02400 I CI:L. 1 S135AA-03701 Cla 1 S135AA 0372 S '' O _ 1 S 135AA-026 1 S135AA 0280 1S13 M-02700 1S135AD-01200 U PINE ST Vicinity Map SDR 96-0014 Notification Map RECEIVED PLANNING FEB 2 6 1996 Name of applicant Gary Kaufman ��RGI( �� )q Subje= Property: Tax Map and !.,ot Lot 1, Block 38, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washi ngt Address or General Location 10360 S.W. 87th Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE Gary Kaufman do affirm that I am (represent) the parry Initiating interest in a proposed constructing a children's day scho l affecting the land located at 10360 S.W. 87th Street Tigard, Or. and did on the 21 day of February , 19 9 6 personalty post notice indicating that the site may be proposed fora Children' s Day School site application, and the time, date and place at a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal development review and building permit Middle of Subject property visable from S.W. 87th and S.W. Hall Blvd The sign was posted at (state location on property) This 21st day of February 19 96 Signature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this l L' day of i-elor tAf , 19 a OFFICIAL SEAL I \itJeJ 1 WENDY Lit;i.►:TT? 'A o NOTARY I'Uls;.IGOJ. .0N Notary Public for Me Srre of Oregon COMMISSION NO OaE.O My Commission Expires; tl 72-3fa.1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.23,1:337 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City cf Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd_ Tigard, OR 97223 login\jv\pcsu ot=t • e/////./' Order No. 148622 DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block '38, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH that portion of SW Mapleleaf that inured to the said lot upon vacation by Ordinance No. 78-182. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion dedicated to the public in Deed recorded October 24, 1980, Recorder's Fee No. 80038501. Z U Z\ ' 11 37 > 2 190.3 ) I Z • -\ ° 1 9 0 0 1901 m 1800 , 0t © > F Q 2364 • ' H O , V A ts • `/ `/ b 1013 M - '� ; • F 1 r — r- ; .�; Y C.S. 1010 f • .., 17020 1700 A 0 r)J M r - r y =r cs.IOST13 - . _ -f-17540 ' - �: 30 40 11415' ' 5 190.3' 6 190 a' h VACATE', 30 ,.._Ire r �APLELEAF STREET 2000 194.16' — — I90.3 190.3' S 1 T ° 13 2 2 0 0 2202 • 0 ® S 0 U) . -r • 2201 ,1 • J O 0 40 l`30 ? I 123 in �) v 2500 ' I 2400 2300 95 2303 893) : _ ..3T - • I 0 ,d to g O 4 _ 2305 2.xT' _ _ r 79 95.30• A ) A j!� C T 1 r 2304 2302 4) g 30 g ® © g .cs S • 6 1 o 9.l9' `4 J `J _ I 1 o.�' 6 T9 16 96.3 r "o 90-3 340 • OAK _ STREET • EAST ' 194 5' 150.3' 1014 s 2600 `; 2700 3 0.2801 2900. 30 00•0 : 0 10• tt . ■ 2800 IC. yL Uf 0 >�e 4400 0 4500 d' — YB .22 Ac. p .1 TAc' - 5 3 n 190.3' •. 5 • • 6 • 0- ss.ti 1 3500 3 3'0 0 C ICAGC • 3o "This plat is for your aid in R..... locating your land with reference to streets and other parcels � _ �� _ r 3 X10 0 '_' , While this plat is believed to be correct,the company assumes 0 no liability for any loss occurring I s+ by reason of reliance thereon." MAP 6 ,s, ,.� 5 _ No, < 1 A S INA T9< V 9 9.11!' CNK MG!)TITLF INSURANCE COMPANY 1 3 3 AD 10001 S E SUNNYSIDE ROAD CLACKAMAS.OnEGON 97•015 Name of applicant Gary Kaufman Subject Property. Tax Map and Lac # Lot 1, Block 38, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washing Address or General Location 10360 S.W. 87th Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE Gary Kaufman do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating interest In a proposed constructing a children's day schl e• ng the land Located at 10360 S.W. 87th Street Tigard, Or. and did on the 21 day of February , 19 96 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed fora Chi 1 dren' s flay School si to application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the propasaL development review and building permit Middle of Subject property visable from S.W. 87th and S.W. Hall Blvd The sign was posted at (state location on property) This 21st d a y of February 19 9 6 • - Signature Subsed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this 1(e= - day of '1'elOY lJl0.yta 19 a_ �•^ OFFICIAL SEAL P,A - £ WENDY Li;i,'W TT- •�• ���. NOTARY PUbL.L;-OI..c::)N Notary Public for e - State of Oregon COMMISSION NO 04:.3i my Expires: /L3/Q MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.23,1;;47 Commission WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard. OR 97223 gn1ifl1 ci Co/9 7 22,7/96 Order No. 148622 DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 38, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH that portion of SW Mapleleaf that inured to the said lot upon vacation by Ordinance No. 78-182. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion dedicated to the public in Deed recorded October 24, 1980, Recorder' s Fee No. 80038501. 37 2 190.3 36 ; J 2J �' Z .-' ° 1900 19 1800 01 © w 0 3,.,.6 Q 4 O A •.; t'/4 Floareve4 / 'C,' bay qSe. Kifil.iC ✓ieAr . x"11 6 zT7 et.-- 20- ' L�' t/.4 i.- <? (.S 2 C^^C 7.-/• . .- 3- �• 41112, ten p .n"‘"1 Mee el,-15 A 501 Q v 7: 6C1)( 3 .4)( CoAS.ef��� � Pang S.-��. _ tom , L.: 3(' j c'-1-AeL • � O. � . . ,tee 6. tiL( Y— -, CG i�b (, i y h) e( J o u4-C, 55_44 („414- it. 43, , i yc.•;-s. G rH c • C z_ • 4G I .y, B Lr� . (,�L4tl'�AL p4) 7 I f-dd 2)4 y C 1-.1 f lca d, Pf4 54-ttly assumes Plccd P/€ ,`y, .= /70 El*-0, 0,4,19,1 yatfcts 6C-- fju rile- ` 'C35 tA y6e S c—c_ o F(oo d P( a.60 L1 s jc. = ( Io O00 s• -r4, wllN) • 6E kill- e7c. r) 'S .e._ b4 Flow.( e ' evcAlotk3 gj25/Ai t 2 • at` lel 11 0) 000 0%2 . 0 ( Sl c.oc A Oe S(‘...3S. W14 < _ Q j (r-rcvevi C-E lie) F-----100 c 1 c r ) /ik- "V--'s- aIX.i ii a ' +, ��.�,-ilT1,- .o+4 -3c - f _ • •• / a■ ■ IIA •° ■ •• • I . e ■ ■ • • SW II YLORS FEnnY ROAD • ♦ / • O ■ ♦ Z _ �/ ■ 1 • y • y ■ // ■ ■ \I / '441% . 40" • • (.a....„. =_ ■ 7 a • • • • I/ • ` * • • f / a ■ ■ ■ /_} SOUTHWEST CEDARCREST STREET• 8******: • • • W ■ ■ In en Z :44:4 • 41Z • F • a -------- •` 00u, y ■ W • �■ ■ Fir ■ LIMIT OF - //.\....t.- D ■ • \ q70 • !`DETAILED LIMIT OF • ■ STUDY STUDY / 0 Q ■ • •• • SW ELMWOO`r STREET l� OZONE A cr • ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ • ■ ■ ZO E B c�r�e.t -- �C/ ` --�_._ �_ �' — — — — z • • ■ �'!; ■ 180 —181 -7 • • • / >> J,� ZONE C as _ _ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ '(WEST N • • ■ ■ • ZONE i STREET —� _ II■ • • ■ / / s -L w S�` m • fi ■ ■ / ZONE Al 112 - �r "3VV SOUTHWEST I CORAL 01 STREET • • / �l ! • ■ ■ ■ I ! ■ ■ 1� _ SOUTHWEST LANDAU STREET ` ■� 7 ti I I • •J //.a SOUTHWEST • • ll LOCUST • STREET Culvert •/ ! � II . j ,.177 �! ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ :) ■■ Ir: ■ ■ ■ : • • ■ SOUTHWEST WEST LOCUST STREET '� I I I I ■ w . 1 W ■ ■ • • (■ ■) ■ • i . ZONE B N y > if v ■ • • 172 a 2 ■ ■ / ■ I X71 .4,._. ' - us so • 52 �� ■ y I- 53 .J I az ■ ■ ZONES N. ■ / ZONEB n ■ ■ 1G7. ..' it 1a _ SOUTHWEST OAK STREET , • SOUTHWEST ■ ■ OAK ■ ! • Z■ ■ STREET IF l 169 II■ ■ ■ / • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ F STATE —SW 95TH HIGHWAY ■AVENUE � ZONE B ■7 161 y K _ HIWEST PINE STREET // ,ir}'1. .It0 4 ''id -i 7 L O,` SW SPRUCE ti '/ `1 . If 3.- 1 7 w sr1h, . ZONE B ■ \ I ii / /, ' / / / , • I ON INV..167.37 _ / \ 180.40'(8W) 2 184.21 ' S89 42' 30" . . kr ELE: 17 .40' I /11("''''' / • • •••■•••■ • • 10.PEDESTRIAN • • / / 1\(1) \ I I • ,•_- - • i I ,..... ELE: 170.50' • • • 7 . ar ... . . . i • . . .. .. . ELE:170.a• .• I .• . . -./. .••••••••• ... ..4 . , , ...... l ,_ . . . . .•• .• . . . •. (.6 .• • .• 1•7.007(13W) .../ELE:1 73.00' .•••• CURB—, / . : i ANDSCAPE I ("‘J • ,,,,,,, .,\, N - • - N 18.-6* , • 0 / \\\ 6 I \ ......4%sLopE FLOW UNE -167.3)• GI - . —, ..., N 'INLET WITH OAP ? T \ 1 .,i ' \ 1 N‘4\\ N's- .4„,......--- lime- N.1. • NA, o 1 I .r ' ; : 3= 1 li!' LE: 1 73.00' ii\_ . _ c, j iv i! '■ 'N , .... . • I/ \ I 0 k ‘. \1 72.00' ELE:170.00' • .— ..— .A., \\:.\\. ... - 1 I I Tr LANDING(VP.) 1431.TO EXCEED e,i3x 4LE:ifo.ocr <, g '.. / % / __ _ , —__________________ 4 / \ 5200E. FtAMP UP /AIL WIT TO EXCEED 6.33% i I ELE:173. • 0'(OW) // • 1 /615' k\. • 1 NOTE: TOTAL CUBIC YARDS OF FILL 6 / 4P FLOOD PLAIN AREA .. 185 CY. / (1001 (100') 27cf/y ■ 185 CY. / FLOOD PLAIN = AREA BELOW ELEVATION 170.00' - ______.- / I DRAINAGE & GRADING PLAN / S C A L E: 1 " = 2 0'-0" Post-It"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 j i'of pages r From T°3> T ao,sp5 a Ioa k vtmac Ongon Co. Co. L7 S< a Dept. Phone#37e- h c? 6 r Fax M 376 -.22,3i Fax# DS� October 11, 1996 DIVISION OF STATE LANDS GARY KAUFMAN KAUFMAN HOMES STATE LAND BOARD 1295 BAXTER RD SE JOHN A. KITZHABER SALEM OR 97306 Governor PHIL KEISLING Secretary of State RE : State File No . RP — 12193 JIM HILL State Treasurer Dear Mr . Kaufman: 7775 Summer Street NE Salem,OR 97310-1337 We have received your application for the removal of 21 (503) 378-3805 cubic yards of material for a storm water filtraton pond TY (503)378-4613 in Washington County. The Division of State Lands requires a permit if you plan to remove, fill or alter 50 cubic yards or more of material within the banks of a waterway. Based on your application, your project involves removal or filling of less than 50 cubic yards of material , therefore a State removal-fill permit is not required. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and local planning department before beginning construction. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, ti/a: CZ/1i William L . Parks Natural Resource Coordinator Field Operation - Western Region rf25 : 199 c: Dale Haslem, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers SEP 3E) 77.6 21 ea Fr • IES ASSOCIATES September 26, 1996 'sI4 rdu,rncau > OVIPia,WA 98502 ':(360)943-0127 Gary Kaufman Kaufman Homes 1295 Baxter Road S.E. Salem, Oregon 97306-1.043 RE: On-site Wetland Determination for Learning Tree Day School site, Twn 1 S, Rng 1 W Sec. 35 : Tax Lot 2000, Tigard,(Washington County), Det. #96.1426. Introduction: On Thursday September 19, 19961 completed a site evaluation of the Learning Tree Day School site located at the corner of Hall Blvd. and SW Mapleleaf Street. The site visit was completed to evaluate the preliminary wetland evaluation completed by Oregon Department of State Lands(DSL) on September 10, 1996. Procedures: The wetlands evaluation was completed using the Corps Qf Army Engineers Wets DelineationJvianual procedures (Technical Report Y-87-I) and the( gon Freshwater Well ands Assessment_Methodology, 1993. Because of the size of the wetland and the DSL wetlands determination some of the steps in the Oregon Methodology were disregarded. The wetland base map , special characterization and many of the questions in the wetland characterization were no completed. Background soils and hydrology evaluations were completed using the SCS Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon, 1982, USGS 7.5 quadrangle topo maps, and City of Tigard street maps. Field work consisted of an evaluation of the DSL flagged boundaries, soil core data analysis, vAgetativc analysis and a preliminary hydrological analysis based on soil texture, water lines, anlor\evidence of winter standing water. • ■ • r •( '.rte .•'�' %J.,24 .. - . F Evaluation Results: • General,Site D_escriptioa; The overall site extends from Hall Blvd. On the east to SW 87th Ave on the west, and from the vacated extension of Mapleleaf Street on the north to an existing residence on the south. The site is relatively flat along the west half The east half slopes down toward Hall Blvd. to the south and east. The lowest point of the property is in the southeast corner. The elevation of the site in this area is equivalent to the elevation on the east side on I fall Blvd. in the Ash Creek flood way. It appears that these two areas were separated by the construction of Hall Blvd. With recent improvements to Hal! Rlvd , the street elevation was raised creating a dam between the site and Ash Creek. This also has created a swale along the west edge of Hall Blvd. where waters that historically connected to Ash Creek become trapped. The trapped water stands in this area until it percolates into the ground or evaporates. Vegeletion The dominant vegetation along the west side of the road in the disturbed area is aix of grasses with reed canarygrass (Plialaris arundeitacea) being dominant in the bottom of the Swale. Other grasses between the canarygrass and the road are a mix of orchard grass(Dactyl's glomerata), quack grass(Agrnpyron repens), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)wit a variety of Facultative Upland to Upland invader forbs. As the slope increase to the west the grasses give way to a mixed tree community with one large black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), Oregon ash (Frax/nus latifolia), and willow (Salix lasicundra). The understory includes Siika willow (Salix sitchensis), and mixed grasses. The upland to the west has a mixed Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menzlesii), big-leafed maple (Ater macrophyllum) overstoiy community with a mixed shrub/grass understory. Soils: Based on the oil Survey_of'W. ass jngton1 Cii n.ty..Q gQn, there are two soil types on the property. The dominant soil, which encompasses all of the site but the southeast corner is Aloha silt loam. The south east corner is Verboot silty clay loam which is the dominant soil along Ash Creek through this area. Verboot is a dark poorly drained soil. When isolated in depressions this soil typically perches water. Soil samples taken on the site varied with the location. Soils in the lowest elevation areas were consistent with the Verboot classification being dark gray/black (10YR 2/1 to 2/2 with a dense 10 YR 5/1-2 B horizon at approximately 12-14 inches. The two marked soil core site generated by DSL were examined. Both had dark soils, however the"13" horizon soils were 2 different, From an analysis of the deeper soils it appears that the northern most core consists of a shallow layer of hydric soils overlaying a deeper"13" horizon of yellowish brown 10 YR 4/3 soils while the southern sample had a deep 10 YR 511 soil horizon that contained more than 2S% clays We established two soils stations between the DSL north site and Hall Blvd. and two more between their north station and their south station. Our north station had a shallow dark surface layer over a yellowish brown subsurface layer. To the south the depth of the surface layer increased and the color of the subsurface layer changed to a light gray loamy clay. All of the hydric soils on the site appear to be a relic connection to Ash Creek and not a hydric soil type created by the perching of water in the existing depression hydrology: The dominant hydrological activity on the site is rainwater runoff and collection in the depression along the west side of Hall Blvd. During winter months the water perches on the loamy clay subsurface soils. However, the lack of other positive indicators, i.e. oxidized root zones, mottling, anaerobic odor, blackened leaves under trees indicates that at least a portion of the Verboot soils are not functioning as hydric soils. Wetlands. We concur with the general wetland location and function of the nS1,wetland, hoWever, based on topography, subsurface soil characteristics, i.e. 12 inches or more below the surface, and the mix of Facultative Upland grasses with the reed canarygrass, we have reduced the length of the wetland from north to south. The depression in the south east corner of the site, extending from IS feet west of Hall Blvd., 20 feet to the west was considered to have hydric soils and positive hydrology. The wetland does not reach the south property line. It extends 60-65 feet to the north, i.e. 85-90 feet from the south property boundary. To the north the wetland narrows to 12 feet. The west boundary remains 20 feet from Hall Blvd. The total wetland encompasses approximately 920 square feet (0.02 acre), (Figure 2, Appendix A). Fu ctn ions_and V_allte_& The small isolated wetland collects limited surface runoff from the site. The water stands in the lowest portion of the development until it percolates into the groundwater table. Existing surface water is filtered as it flows through the grass, however, all of the water is from a natural area so there are no man generated silts or contaminants. Because of its size and location, i.e abutting Hall Blvd., the wetland provides no fish and wildlife habitats for wetland or water dependent species. A selection of small passerine birds, that 3 are common in urban areas, use the upland area to the west. Classification: Under the Cowardin system used, by DSL and the Army Corps of Engineers, Wetlands end Deep ter Habitat, of the United S as, Cowardin, 1979, the wetland would be classified as a Palustrine Persistent Seasonally Saturated Emergent Marsh Wetland (PEMI E). Under United Sewage Agencies (USA)guidelines, which are accepted by City of Tigard, standard buffer widths are 25 ft. A twenty five foot buffer around the 920 sq fl. wetland will encompass 5680 Ail. ft of the project site or and area 6.2 times larger than the wetland. This does not include that portion of the buffer that extends into Hall Blvd. or onto the neighbors property to the south (600 sq.ft.). Project Impacts: Under the proposed project plan the wetland would be impacted by the north end of the • retention/detention pond, and one parking space. A 25'buffer would impact the remainder of the detention pond, seven additional parking spaces, the east 25' of the open space play area and extend 10 feet into the paved portion of Hall Blvd.. The proposed detention pond will be 1.4 times larger than the existing wetland and provide the same functions, i.e. water collection and biofiltretion. Il1iffsLEnhaur»icut The project will include a buffer enhancement plan in an effort to reduce the standard buffer widths. The plan will include: (1) revegetation of the disturbed area between the wetland and Hall Blvd. with a short shrub community to provide small bird and mammal habitat between the detention pond and the road and the wetland and the road (2) increased shrub/tree vegetation to the south and east of the proposed detention pond (3) revegetation of l5 feet of the north end and west side of the butler with a shrub/tree mix (4) maintain the easternmost portion of the playground in grass with a narrow shrub buffer next to 4 the wetland This would maintain a minimum 15 fool buffer around the wetland; reduce the parking lot losses to three, create 3500 sq. ft. of shrub/tree wildlife habitat, and create 1290 sq. ft of seasonal open water(detention pond). This constitute the wetland and project impacts report for the Learning Tree Day School site by IES Associates. Sincerely . 11,1], Van Wormer ' Senior Riolppist lES Associates x.urhw,iv 5 4 .. ' . ' "%1.1? 1'r '9; 03:13 i. 11111:111 I1c t •. �.4 • 1P2 II. C.,? , , Co n 1 .- vo /' t,.. .. I r bb I .... �_. _____3alt' ._. r►'� ^ .�'"�.. ^-.._.._......... .... '•4• • • • ._- r.f• Wq...•••••Y1,.•v■.•,•♦•••.•_�..,w...•..w•. „w...rwr ._.�. ....^.,._.. ..y ....,. ...._.w..n......•..• -•.. e+• -1- .1.,i. S. W. ti 7TH A xtNUC ifo.0 14 ii .. ..w..�..y.. ............ .`.�.�..�......._...w.- �_•.■ _� L _�._ 1 t■ttn�\+ 4 • t1Cr1+A•• t/N:t.01f7UAN' I • �° _- - .._...-_-....-•...<..t.g...... .,--•-1j•..,-r. ... xn ..........:•.7,7,—, r.r'.r;.r. .• _ -- .....•t.., ;II •SOOO8'45°W ,h..ar+: oil ,I x0 ,,)``�� . '.•t;. ;' '' �A I•'6}� .N•f•ya Y' •' , ••1••� 'i ' • _ "`,f. I'i rr,'i .I•f, a�b rJf' X it, I � ∎' ^;L K ,i .ePrteilr ti ft,/: '/ I �''i e+•r' ••••3,',',•,,•1'•t�e ri 'I ;I It. r.,r ; 1....4. .;k.. 4. I .:1'it{ 1..!.'.3:..,11 ( . . �'J �g J 3r :30)4".../.•,'.. • I 1.A. I I ,lr•.r .r�1y►t�ft L•. � � r I i ;1'i t>�t:Vjp) ti�,, O 11 I I ul Ikd4 i,4e,ut,;('+f'i` it * 1 . :! 1>r F•rr'rtt' i3'r,.'i1 I I:1 Ii �'ir�� �';fj%'fry+rri.; /�� i I �• .,•.' .•.t'•�'• •!• '/� ���(}'''r ;):T f i{•t r J f � r 7 1.0.x 10 O' •• II * I •W i 4. r 1. :r•rr•,r;•J t• ! r . • •r -. {!i('itt;iri(?i feir ttr)' .�• k 1 .' d i ;0-1 t: J.'i,'i{.i rt d I j' a I , '11 1• f' '•,r. :'},tr 11;4',S 1 y , I ' ,, Yf :;:•';:t..1,t1 1-1';141'43;I,t i; Mi I a N c. � •rr , -I ;,,fir: 1':}r; tr t ` lytIrl , � }1i�4 yi�ri f f Ji 1 fib sr l • I.,,,Ty .'tt:3r. 141 0414 ;: o h� - - .I r 1l. [ 1 . 1i�.. awr•� �r ,,1� i4,i•,�'ri rr 4141/'1'•,•1;1(',1 '4),, (1 O j t, ,� 1. r `144.44y;Wi',./.1:..,A,,;,.41:,./1 �OJG•I P'1 T Niii� U1 . y � I I 1131#•,r r , J sSt --` Q 1`1�1 'r Y•f�•' '41 l`./.N 61, J i4 1 I * /r I. 4i'' '' l:.ta'. e,,lb��t r „+�;r .•' 'I� I •.w��r •I..Y +II I f yI � , ,no• 1 1 1� • 'iy�ti,ri.1;J ;`7 f.r � ,{ I t,lY{ ... 1 • r5 ,�1rfyyY�d jtr igr. , x I • ;i i:'.;' tt•1'11 Y'•1I{'♦•3✓ '..!' r,t• . 'Idl' , Y I •111• i r r 1•t r t, 111•••1• -c.,-4...,•.r31 i 't I/, i,t, + ' •el.1 sA• 1• y /•1 , s p V 3 . ) [ I r III [, 1\1:, il If I' l'e.' ...... . W 7-,/.....11,,N.i.) '. .) A 11:11 . • . .'"'°,r"K • L.rlr .. .••••••• I ..,..... ..::1:.err. • e,...•+•.. .• .--- . . ''-'--�''y�{I i r 15 (l'' ; ...x.113♦♦ . .,r..•.0 •♦r.r./..Y�.•.�.....r.. .w..w...,,._r• sou oA'•�s°►y Roo.11' I" 7.1 0 0 ►•MI4./ ,..1.•1R 1' 1 �i,I61• 1 1 1 1lf t' re, 1 I 11(i:' 4,1 r/ I t, ' 'q; p ;-- s HALL BLVD . t{ ; ...... ._ . ��..w .. .._.� .. �' s = r ,,. ......_... . .. ... .:.t..,..: ... . _ Oregon October 4, 1996 DSLF . Rex Van Wormer IES Associates 1514 Muirhead Ave. Olympia, WA 98502 DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Re: Wetland Determination Report for Learning Tree Day School Site STATE LAND BOARD T1 S, R1 W, Sec. 35; Tax Lot 2000; Tigard (Washington County) JOHN A. KITZHABER Det. #96-0426 Governor PHIL KEISLING Secretary of State JIM HILL Dear Mr. Van Wormer: State Treasurer I have just reviewed your report for the project referenced above. I had 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310-1337 recently conducted an on-site wetland determination on this parcel for your (503) 378-3805 client, and flagged a conservative wetland/upland boundary. Based upon FAX (503) 378-4844 TTY (503) 378-4615 the information presented from your more detailed site investigation, I concur with your findings as shown on the Plot Plan figure included in your report. The identified wetlands are jurisdictional and subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. A state Removal-Fill permit is required for fill or removal of 50 cubic yards or more of material in the wetlands. Federal and local regulations may also apply. Ms. Beth Thompson of Kaufman Homes submitted a Removal-Fill permit application to the Division today, concurrently with the submittal of your report. Should you be involved with the permitting process, please coordinate with Bill Parks (extension 234) regarding the application. If you or your client have any questions, please feel free to call me at extension 246. Thank you for your report. Sincerely, Mary Pakenham-Walsh Wetlands Specialist c: Jim Goudzwaard, Corps of Engineers Dan Gresham, Corps of Engineers Beth Thompson, Kaufman Homes City of Tigard Planning Department Bill Parks, DSL • /11) lialig°# °11111;°11 .--- -.i - 9S) /3\ P ��d ( n -- wiu PP' — n O `� (A)/-410-1 S 5 �l o :�i:. TAYLOR'S CAI\ S I' `6z Q , ' D CFDARCREST ;'" ST _ i T 91ST Q AVE €` 4 ci/4________ EL/A./COD EL/A./COD Cl ESI�UT ST ioi EL/A./COD ST ' • ,4 c BORDERS ST f SCENT GROVE Lo-fN - '�:ill 1 ST OCK __$1-___ CEMETERY N I m R Ci 2AL LARCH ST. IL 13 is LANDAU ~- ST 0 OCUST cn - Q ST a a a L el .. . EI MAPLEAF ST /3f '1.1. in OAK ST m ,'r ST / .4.', V2 " if g3 6.417,,a - SAY ; .-_:r sRajcE C-10 S _-_ '.1 • , a TF a W = L- , N r 6 TE]€E ST. '1H DAKOTA ST. X a 6 Q N Q Mir- IVES a a TAIV q r- 1 LONQTA ti \ i rc-T: in 6 �, El(8 4 LA . . • S. W. MAI'LtLLAI- s i tt L 1 ' • (R/W VACATED 78-182) . . S89 42' 30"W ;,. . . . III Ir 2 ■14.■ .._ 4 flt,17 .1i, . ... . • . . . - • - .. • ' 1 79.2'I' . . ... ..... . .F11:0111.277 11144) 1 ll'r"(4• ITEICE 11 100 10 •••• •. •21" - -Ill:1 PAW clan • 1 M. ,,npo n I . I 10 If Iff:110214 `..., 9 121•11•511,11 ---.--- ',---•---' • • 115E EA1/12FNI __. .-. • - IX • • • It I 90 0 I II.1:;•-0211141 12,1144111 I) Q) • Rr 111,41. . B) 24'•0" 44110 W II, fIR t ° • , ,f3 -- ELL,179.21 IBM 022 • 1•1,:lfr • .O.w. LI_i pr fr .1 I' I. LJ . •.(1 i ' • 1 :._ @ 0 * •.\ I rmr.10 BE I k, , • . _.' D '1, •.•.'.1. 11(1•10vID H 0 ro , . 3 > . ‘ f• •'•• •ki I.%k 0 0A44 ••• ;'r..1 @ I I ... Z & ••••.••Im • • _J " . • • • • • • CURe 16.(i IN/LOVE •■•-le .•V15111EAPA111(\ --_-..,..-....__ ___ :.----•••-- - • CC1 ill P77 31) ..._..2- - -. ':••••111Ta.(1/W1 111) 111:171.00 .112.17 • 1 - I I 1 4 0.47 1014 11190411 I - 111173171 • kli _J 6. ... 0 _J . .0- (INS -jk,...._ ---- 172.0.______• • 30-7' . I. I I 12 1.2,2160•11 \ 6 I tw.1.6-.1114 (0•• • 1 2/.• •y15101 :11APAW1 . .• IL ANDSC API 411 ._ 10 LIP/40.1C.f0 A I M _____---,-- --------- 01r. . ... . . ' ------ som•ay ',?,,, 4..1. pp- A.. , . I STANDARD BUFFE I--t, . • • • • .• • . - • . m,.. s ., ,01 iiiiiii:,,si • .: .• • i _,,...1,,.,...L.,.. ...1(4,, i_ . 1,—- . • . . • • co *./IL \is."1 Ni- A A • • '7 I .\ i 08.•0. .%. . .4., • _ - 4 ,.... 1 Iry 3.414 9sC.Ew.7 A A • • ./ . A A . = •=-•=.,fiAn 0-. rki UM I i NO 171 IF 4111,47. • "A, .:,... 1 • CV,1-= . • LLJ_L I LW •--•=1--. ..... h'i r '.'•°. ' (C.:13". P R 0\\P 0 S E D D A:Y:1C es.o' s.. 4 v!' 0 sp ''...':.:':..**6:°"::::::"..Z:;::::::;;.:•:. .... 1 1: : 1.E• 17 \ • ••• 1...53G. • I i:i.;•:.;.:•:..;::-I•i- •••••;:i•.:..:../.:1••;•:!:•;.•;;: ^"..^.2.•w^ .^J.': trl • il ‘h• • • •• •• . . ••••••.•.. • s 1.:•.;..:••••••••:.••:,:..::::7?,.,.................:...... .. .% ,s. .st, : .1 v) 4 §.. r . 1 1 9 COX.WALK , 1 1 1 .•:. „. II . • • • : :::H: I • i'D •••••:•::••••••••••••::•::::•..".•••••••::••:..4.'4...'•••••••%••••••"!.•••••••••••4••••••••••••••.:••• •:••••••••. TOOOLD:••••••••••:••••:••••••••••,:/:::,•:•••••:••••• 0. ,.• ..• 1.,,..• . . 1 • • • •WA It . . . . I •• •• •• •:. •• •..•••••••••.. •• •••.••••• .••:.•.••••••••••• .•••..••••••••••••• •..••.••• •• ...,...,....••••:. •• ...•...... PLOTPLAN .....:::.:::-::::-:::::.:::::::::i;ci.iiiii;_....,:::::........:...., :...:.,:.,..„...:.:..:::::PLAY AREA . ......::.....:........:. I i .•:.......„.............„...............,.. .,...............................................•....„.....:.........„.......... ' , H SCALE: 1" = 30 -0 1 I I 8 ELL 173.50 (1.1:17510 1147/•••••••••••••••••••••.. :,,,,,,,,,.•"T HMID,E934Ej 4.111:1111:1 iSitei. . ..CIMWE 179.211 [ :E7i91i•G 4.4 .____ _..:........S.81.9 42'30"W • Pi-\E-E 2 615Z Oregon September 12, 1996 Beth Thompson Kaufman Homes 1295 Baxter Rd. SE DIVISION OF Salem, OR 97306-1043 STATE LANDS STATE LAND BOARD Re: On-site Wetland Determination for Learning Tree Day School Site JOHN A. KITZHABER TO1S, RO1W, Sec. 35; Tax Lot 2000; Tigard (Washington County) Governor Det. #96-0426 PHIL KEISLING Secretary of State JIM HILL State Treasurer Dear Ms. Thompson: 775 Summer Street NE Salem,OR 97310-1337 In response to your request to review the above-mentioned site for potential (503) 37S-3805 occurrence of wetlands, I conducted an on-site investigation on September FAX (5 ) =18 g p TTY (503)03 378 1615 378- -1-1 10, 1996. Field observations and supporting data indicate that there is an approximately 20-foot wide swath of wetland extending along the eastern edge of the parcel, adjacent to Hall Blvd. The area is 100% dominated by reed canarygrass, and lies between the gentle slope on the west and Hall Blvd. on the east. In an "office review" of the site, I found that neither the National Wetland Inventory or Local Wetland Inventory shows wetlands mapped on the site. Soil mapping indicates a hydric (wet) soil in the far southeastern corner of the site. These maps provide an indication of what one may find on-site. Please find enclosed a site sketch indicating (approximately) the wetland area and two sampling points (SP-1 and SP-2) that exhibited indicators that meet the criteria for wetlands. I flagged the approximate wetland/upland boundary with sequentially numbered (1-8) orange flagging and stakes. I also marked the sampling points. Due to time constraints, the flagged boundary is approximate and also somewhat conservative (meaning the wetland area could be a bit smaller). A consultant list is enclosed should you desire to hire a wetland specialist to locate a more exact boundary and/or assist with potential permit applications. It appears that the wetland area historically comprised the western edge of the Ash Creek floodplain, prior to construction of Hall Blvd. It is possible that Hall Blvd. impedes eastward downslope water flow and may have enhanced wetland conditions on the site as a result. However, it may be a stretch to conclude that the wetland area was "created" by such conditions in that soil mapping indicates the historic floodplain extended at least into the southeast corner of the site. Beth Thompson September 12, 1996 Page 2 These wetlands are jurisdictional and subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. A state Removal-Fill permit is required for fill or removal of 50 cubic yards or more of material in the wetlands. Federal and local regulations may also apply. It appears based on the current project design that a permit would be required from the Division. Bill Parks (extension 234) is the permit coordinator for Washington County. I have discussed this project with him, and he is available to answer questions and provide further guidance. If you have questions about the determination itself, please do not hesitate to give me a call at extension 246. Sincerely, Mary Pakenham-Walsh Wetlands Specialist c: Jim Goudzwaard, Corps of Engineers Dan Gresham, Corps of Engineers City of Tigard Planning Department Bill Parks, DSL t DEPARTMENT OF THE ARM. • ' \, R PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS .4k �' 't\ lialr !4' P.O.BOX 2946 �' /; PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 � ,,. % October 18, 1996 - ,, ;-- ,-; REPLY TO ',._'2'- ATTENTION OF: Operations, Construction, and Readiness Division SUBJECT: Permit Application No: 96-1618, Provisional Nationwide Permit Gary Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE Salem, Oregon 97306 Dear Mr. Kaufman: Your application (Enclosure 1) for Department of the Army authorization to construct a storm water filtering pond was received. According to your application, you are proposing to fill 0.008 acres of wetland. This project is located in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 North in Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Based on the information included in your application, the proposed work would be authorized under the terms of the nationwide permit described below subject to the conditions found at Enclosure 2. However, water quality certification from Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has not been issued for this nationwide permit. Therefore, according to Federal law, the proposed work is not authorized until you secure water quality certification from DEQ. • Water quality certification for your proposed work will be considered by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Mr. Tom Rosetta, telephone (503) 229-5845. By copy of this letter, we are notifying DEQ of your proposed work. If water quality certification is issued, any imposed conditions will become a requirement of your authorization. Nationwide permit 33 CFR 330, Appendix A, Section B, 26, authorizes discharges of dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters provided: a. The discharge does not cause the loss of more than 10 acres of waters of the United States; b. The permittee notifies the district engineer if the discharge would cause the loss of waters of the United States greater than one acre in accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For discharges in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must also include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands. (Also see 33 CFR 330.1(e)); and -2- c. The discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent, is part of a single and complete project. For the purposes of this nationwide permit, the acreage of loss of waters of the United States includes the filled area plus waters of the United States that are adversely affected by flooding, excavation or drainage as a result of the project. The ten-acre and one-acre limits of NWP 26 are absolute, and cannot be increased by any mitigation plan offered by the applicant or required by the District Engineer. To insure the work qualifies for the above nationwide permit, you must comply with the following requirements: 1. No work is to be performed in the waterway or adjacent wetlands until water quality certification is secured from DEQ. 2. You must obtain permits, where required, under Oregon's Removal/Fill Law and appropriate local authorizations. 3. Fill materials shall be free of toxic substances which are in concentrations that are toxic to aquatic (and other) life. 4. During construction, techniques shall be employed to prevent petroleum products, chemicals, harmful materials, construction debris, excessive suspended solids (including dredged material ---and wet concrete), and machinery from entering the ---waterway. 5. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with native vegetation and maintained to insure viability for at least three years. Vegetation clearing shall be limited to that required for project construction. - Authorization for your work is valid until two years beyond the date of this letter unless the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. If you have any questions regarding our nationwide permit authority, please contact me at the above address or telephone (503) 326-7731. S.i - - D. Gresham III 'roj ect Manager Regulatory Branch Enclosures Copies Furnished: ODSL (Parks) DEQ (Rosetta) CO-GP (Black) HOMES INC. Gary Kaufman Dean Kaufman Duane Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE • Salem, Oregon 97306 • Phone: (503)370-8390 • Fax (503)370-2731 October 22, 1996 Dan Gresham Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208-2946 Re: Permit Application No. 96-1618 Dear Mr. Gresham: Attached please find a revised site plan (dated 10-18-96). As requested by the City of Tigard, the water filtering pond has been removed from the wetland. There will be no dirt removal or fill to take place within 15-0" of the wetland. Please contact me at (503) 370-8390 if you have any questions or need further information. Sincerely, Beth Thompson Architectural Designer S.W. M A P L E L E A F STREET REVISED DATE: 161890 G (R/W VACATED 78-182) � — --- EIE:n Orr IE leolo,, /ELL 1E1040 TEN/) 179.21' 58942'30"W h ---- fEal79.OD' /fuE7E 4M 9617 OBSEIfMii c �>.— g�.�� -FENCE 10 PEDESTIBAN CLpR a 1 _ 115E EA9:KEN1 4 11 \\\.I__ _ 1 .A1E Q LY W • GARBAGE DIAVSTER 0 = D.Ir2•BON PIPE D5111T�D © tb Z N0.43- W 3.66' 40-0' Z FIR •I 24.-C•IE I/B 90-_ El E:1792 (BM 7�V 9) w OAK ® 45.0'111.0.m. ' - • )Y Cr ) H > Q to I `�`� Q —OAK TO BE Air REMOVED/ tj m • ; ®o.K Omgon September 12, 1996 CD% Beth Thompson Kaufman Homes 1295 Baxter Rd. SE DIVISION OF Salem, OR 97306-1043 STATE LANDS STATE LAND BOARD Re: On-site Wetland Determination for Learning Tree Day School Site JOHN A. KITZHABER T01 S, RO1W, Sec. 35; Tax Lot 2000; Tigard (Washington County) Governor Det. #96-0426 PHIL KEISLING Secretary of State JIM HILL State Treasurer Dear Ms. Thompson: 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310-1337 In response to your request to review the above-mentioned site for potential (503) 378-3805 occurrence of wetlands, I conducted an on-site investigation on September FAX (58-4 g p TTY (503)03)37378-46844 15 10, 1996. Field observations and supporting data indicate that there is an approximately 20-foot wide swath of wetland extending along the eastern edge of the parcel, adjacent to Hall Blvd. The area is 100% dominated by reed canarygrass, and lies between the gentle slope on the west and Hall Blvd. on the east. In an "office review" of the site, I found that neither the National Wetland Inventory or Local Wetland Inventory shows wetlands mapped on the site. Soil mapping indicates a hydric (wet) soil in the far southeastern corner of the site. These maps provide an indication of what one may find on-site. Please find enclosed a site sketch indicating (approximately) the wetland area and two sampling points (SP-1 and SP-2) that exhibited indicators that meet the criteria for wetlands. I flagged the approximate wetland/upland boundary with sequentially numbered (1-8) orange flagging and stakes. I also marked the sampling points. Due to time constraints, the flagged boundary is approximate and also somewhat conservative (meaning the wetland area could be a bit smaller). A consultant list is enclosed should you desire to hire a wetland specialist to locate a more exact boundary and/or assist with potential permit applications. It appears that the wetland area historically comprised the western edge of the Ash Creek floodplain, prior to construction of Hall Blvd. It is possible that Hall Blvd. impedes eastward downslope water flow and may have enhanced wetland conditions on the site as a result. However, it may be a stretch to conclude that the wetland area was "created" by such conditions in that soil mapping indicates the historic floodplain extended at least into the southeast corner of the site. Beth Thompson September 12, 1996 Page 2 These wetlands are jurisdictional and subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. A state Removal-Fill permit is required for fill or removal of 50 cubic yards or more of material in the wetlands. Federal and local regulations may also apply. It appears based on the current project design that a permit would be required from the Division. Bill Parks (extension 234) is the permit coordinator for Washington County. I have discussed this project with him, and he is available to answer questions and provide further guidance. If you have questions about the determination itself, please do not hesitate to give me a call at extension 246. Sincerely, Mary Pakenham-Walsh Wetlands Specialist c: Jim Goudzwaard, Caps of Engineers Dan Gresham, Corps of Engineers City of Tigard Planning Department Bill Parks, DSL • • OREGON DIVISION OF ST' 'E LANDS • 75 Summer Street NE, Sal , OR 97310 503/378-3805 ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION REPORT For the Purpose of Administering the State Removal-Fill Law At the request of the landowner or his/her agent, an onsite wetland determination has been conducted on the property described below. COUNTY kick Glin5fcit CITY Tigd(-c1 OWNER/AGENT NAME & ADDRESS : �e2.- -1.1L1o,ntipsc-/N d le-LV,tf04a^ yo tc e.s 12gs Ba -fer (ad. Sa, Set lew�, O2 T 306-IN 3 PROJECT NAME : Leary i^5 Trt� l°`Y Svka-v( STREET LOCATION W. o \-}wll t31✓ct, (O(ft... ,7F 34k 5i• •) . .- or-- 8-11-1‘,_ S. of wmapk lei RcJJ T 015 R S 3S TAX LOT(S) 2coD DATE OF SITE VISIT: /hoiglo NWI Quad: Wetlands on NWI? �0 Waterbody:(Dra..F+) ( w f No Agrindtural Land? Prior-Converted Cropland? ❑ There are no jurisdictional wetlands or waterways on the property. Therefore, no state removal-fill permit is required. Notes : There are wetlands and/or waterways on the site that are subject to the state Removal-Fill Law. A permit is required for 50 cubic yards or more of fill, removal , or other ground alteration . Notes : •f kiw „lam. 144_ A wetland delineation be be needed \to locate and stake the wetland/nonwetland boundary. A consultant list is enclosed. ,io{L 5 pec cod ty. ❑ A permit will be required for ❑ No permit will be required for because/if XA permit may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers (326-6995) Comments : P(Ca5 12 f-_ Determination by: InActry ?:Alca-nt-\awA- 1.^1c- Date : 11119(0 Copy To : Owner/Applicant , nclosures : xk(+ (�sf1 sic sluff+, 51k no*s/c/ h r o 'cL Planning Department (7-aJdz("Ita� Corps of Engineers la B ;Il ti��k s DSL. ❑ DSL file copy ❑ DSL reading file copy JCM: 814 1'1 �/ . cE) (1-)rakf--I-) 1,;.:vi I 3:- , .. 4 Wlq PP' — n° z. ii Uu L-Ku S S (1 cvt/ij •..-:i an y :f TAYLOR'S �`=� ..... ,. w CT BIRCH a",....(/// ST. ST. 2 a Q iD CL'aP CEDARCREST ST a D 9. �...44---n W l '- )__,. 3 a_ESWT ST _I . 91ST a 4 AVE ELIA,CCO ST.�iii ., W BCRDERS ST. 4e Pi.:-- ∎ —. ;CENT GROVE L ST. a ocK am ST. CEMETERY o i� ET) $ LARCH ST. / CCRAL 13 LANDAU r__ ST 9 LOCUST i_ .s........._ ST a a a f a t( `c~n `, 11�1 MApLELEAF ST OAK , ST 00 = ST _ . a ,r. PII`E ST S}-1ADY '`/ .�L: i C-10 T 0; ; � ` �,� y�_... ,'•:mot..<y ST. 4 Q IR•'"' a y �w tom'' ` �r , P STE1v� ST. •.... I 4W • a CRTH DAKOTA 1 a ST ._ ■ N G \1` N ~ P Q g, rn v �� Q . N Ff AFFLE ST a -_11IS a 11(..---./. ,LN. n LLMITA Q T• ea • A '® y \ U- Tom, � 9�� ' � A- i—E—T. . , , • OREGON WETLAND DELINEATION CONSULTANTS 9/1/96 This list has been developed for public information purposes. Inclusion or exlusion on the list does not constitute a recommendation by the Division of State Lands (DSL). The list only inludes firms or individuals that have submitted a wetland delineation for review by DSL within the last year. AGRA Earth and Environmental Coffey &Associates David Evans & Associates, Inc. Colin MacLaren 3488 Liberty Rd S Bruce Henderson 7477 SW Tech Center Dr. Salem, OR 97302 2828 SW Corbett Ave Portland, OR 97223-8024 (503) 588-6585 Portland, OR 97201 (503) 639-3400 (503) 223-6663 Construction & Consulting Bend-(503) 389-7614 Abiqua Engineering, Inc. Claude J. Wookey Corvallis-(541) 754-0043 Pat Thompson 60105 Sterling Dr 912 12th St. SE Bend, OR 97702 Fishman Environmental Services Salem, OR 97302 (503) 385-1766 C.Mirth Walker (503) 391-2864 434 NW Sixth Ave Ste 304 Scott Craig, PWS Portland, OR 97209-2600 Adolfson Associates W.E.T. Inc. (503) 224-0333 Jean Oschsner PO Box 632 333 SW 5th Ave Ste 600 Corvallis, OR 97339 Greenpoint Consulting Portland, OR 97201 (541) 753-8635 Laura Brophy (503) 226-8018 2625 NW Mulkey Ave A.G. Crook Company Corvallis, OR 97330 ALS Consulting _ Rita Mroczek (541) 752-7671 Dan Krause 1800 NW 169th Place Ste 8-100 9205 Woodlawn Ave N Beaverton, OR 97006 Hardey Engineering & Assoc. Seattle, WA 98103 (503) 690-9658 Tom Holmes (206) 526-9602 PO Box 1625 John Edge 1600 Sky Park Dr. Ste E Beak Consulting 840 Empire St. NW Medford, OR 97504 Greg Challenger Salem, OR 97304 (541) 772-6053 Jack Dalton (503) 362-4222 317 SW Alder D. Judith Henshel Portland, OR 97204 Ellis Ecological Services, Inc. PO Box 1081 (503) 248-9507 Robert Ellis Eugene, OR 97440 20988 S Springwater Rd (541) 485-0891 Mike Blair Estacada, OR 97023 1236 Debrick Rd H.G.E. Inc. Eugene, OR 97401 Emerald Wetland Consulting John Schwartz (541) 485-0983 Dr. Thomas Pringle 375 Park Ave PO Box 3429 Coos Bay, OR 97420 BWR Associates, Inc. Eugene, OR 97403 (541) 269-1166 Robert L. Gantenbein Jr. (541) 484-0669 920 Mason Way Margaret Johnson Medford, OR 97501 EnviroData Systems, Inc. 1178 Lexington Ave (503) 779-2646 Robert F. McVein Astoria, OR 97103 2233 NE 244th Ave Ste C-1 (503) 325-0467 Ch2M/Hill Troutdale, OR 97060 Steve Mader (503) 227-2057 Jeffrey Kee 825 NE Multnomah St. #1300 13638 NW Riverview Dr. Portland, OR 97232-2146 Env. Assessments of Oregon Portland, OR 97231-2200 (503) 235-5000 William Wren (503) 240-0233 PO Box 1127 Cascade Earth Sciences, Ltd. Gleneden Beach, OR 97388 Diane Kiemnec 3425 Spicer Rd. (541) 994-3323 9160 SW Washington Albany, OR 97321 Portland, OR 97225 (541) 926-7737 EnviroScience, Inc. (503) 297-5918 Portland-(503) 282-7502 Ron Rathburn La Grande-(503) 963-7758 1201 SW 12th Ave#410 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 241-0373 i OREGON WETLA DELINEATION CONSULTANTS ant.) Kurahashi & Associates, Inc. Parametrix, Inc. Seminole Environmental, Inc. Kendra Smith Daniel O. Kelly Timothy Barnes 12600 SW 72nd Ave 7820 NE Holman Ste B-6 12632 Silverton Rd NE Tigard, OR 97223-8334 Portland, OR 97218-2859 Silverton, OR 97381 (503) 968-1605 (503) 256-5444 (503) 873-5404 Jay Lorenz, Ph.D. PBS Environmental Jerry Simonson 1521 NW Harrison Blvd Greg Baker 34451 Riverside Dr. Corvallis, OR 97330 1220 SW Morrison Albany, OR 97321 (541) 758-9334 Portland, OR 97205 (541) 926-7485 Land & Water Env. Services (503) 248-1939 Loren Waldron Sisul Engineering 525 SE Main PBS Environmental 375 Portland Ave Roseburg, OR 97470 Chuck Gottfried Gladstone, OR 97127 (541) 672-0393 2645 Willamette St (503) 657-0188 Ste A Lyon & Associates Eugene, OR 97405 Stuntzner Engineering Richard E. Lyon R.S. (541) 686-8684 705 S 4th 12035 NE Beverly Dr. PO Box 118 Newport, OR 97365 Ethen Perkins Coos Bay, OR 97420 (541) 265-6826 2410 Monroe St McKenzie Environmental Eugene, OR 97405-2469 Wilbur Ternyik Katheryne McKenzie (541) 345-3944 Wetland, Beach & Dunes Consulting PO Box 131 PO Box 1190 Neotsu, OR 97364 Phoenix Environmental Florence, OR 97439 (541) 994-8427 George Ehlers, P.G. (541) 997-2401 2835 Camp Baker Rd. Anna Mockler Medford, OR 97501 Duncan & Jane Thomas 1717 14th Ave (503) 535-1968 Environmental Consultants Seattle, WA 98122-2624 2060 NW Dogwood (206) 485-0891 Roger A. Redfern Corvallis, OR 97330 1701 SE Ladd (541) 752-6529 Todd Moses Portland, OR 97214 434 NW Sixth Ave Ste 305 Portland, OR 97209 (503) 233-2011 W& H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Ave (503) 224-9645 SRI/Shapiro Beaverton, OR 97008-7159 NW Biological Consulting Stan Geiger (503) 626-0455 PO Box 671 1650 NW Front Ave Ste 302 Ashland, OR 97520 Portland, OR 97209 Wetland Specialties (503) 488-1061 (503) 274-9000 Jennifer Guard 3425 Westward Ho Ave Ochoco Biological Services Salix Associates Eugene, OR 97401-5885 Jeff Braatne 2525 Potter (541) 683-6627 699 W Second St Eugene, OR 97405 Prineville, OR 97754 (541) 343-2364 Loverna Wilson (503) 447-5270 (541) 753-9514 PO Box 2284 Otak, Inc. (541) 758-4500 Corvallis, OR 97339 Aaron English (541) 758-3403 PO Box 1379 Martin Schott Lake Oswego, OR 97035-0379 152 SE 3rd St Woodward-Clyde Consultants (503) 635-3618 Canby, OR 97013 David Barrows (503) 266-6946 Lynn Sharp Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. 111 SW Columbia Ste 990 John van Staveren Scoles Associates, Inc. Portland, OR 97201 9450 SW Commerce Circle Ste 180 Phil Scoles (503) 222-7200 Wilsonville, OR 97070 PO Box 3558 (503) 570-0800 Portland, OR 97208 (503) 224-2811 W. IINGTON WETLAND DELINEAT. . CONSULTANTS Adolfson Associates, Inc. Jones & Stokes Associates Andrew J. Castelle Diane Sheldon 5309 Shilshole Ave NW 2820 Northup Way#100 Seattle, WA 98107-5318 Bellevue, WA 98004-1419 (206) 778-4273 (206) 522-1214 Agua Tierra Environmental L.C.Lee & Associates, Inc. Consulting Lyndon Lee 506 Edison St. SE Ste 100 221 1st Ave West Ste 415 Olympia, WA 98501 Seattle, WA 98119 (360) 754-3755 (206) 283-0673 ALS Consulting Anna Mockler Dan Krause 1717 14th Ave 9205 Woodlawn Ave N Seattle, WA 98122-2624 Seattle, WA 98103 (206)485-0891 (206) 526-9602 Parametrix, Inc. David Evans & Associates, Inc. James Kelly Jeff Meyer 5808 Lake Washington 3700 Pacific Hwy E Ste 311 Blvd NE#200 Tacoma, WA 98424 - Kirkland, WA 98033-7350 (206) 922-9780 (206) 455-2550 Ebasco Environmental The Resource Company, Inc 10900 NE 8th St Kevin Grosz Bellevue, WA 98004-4405 510 West Mill Plain Ste 2A (206)451-4500 Vancouver, WA 98660 (360) 693-4555 Environmental Technology Consultants (ETC) Shapiro&Associates, Inc. Richard Bublitz Marc E. Boule 2400 Broadway 1201 3rd Ave Ste 1700 Vancouver, WA 98663 Seattle, WA 98101 (360)696-4403 (206) 624-9190 Herrera Environmental W& H Pacific Consultants 3025 112th Ave NE Kevin Noon PO Box C-97304 2200 Sixth Ave Ste 601 Bellevue,WA 98009-9304 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 827-0220 (206)441-9080 Wastren, Inc. IES Associates, Inc. Michael Vigil Rex Van Warmer 1050 Gilmore Ste C 1514 Muirhead Ave Richland, WA 99352 Olympia, WA 98502 (509) 946-9434 (360) 943-0127 (503) 297-6081 Wetland Science App., Inc. Charles J. Newling J.S. Jones &Associates 3921 Blossom Dr NE Jeffrey S. Jones Tacoma, WA 98422 8678 Island Dr. S (206) 927-0404 Seattle, WA 98118 (206) 725-6389 The JD White Company 1111 Main Ste 300 g fix; Vancouver, WA 98666 r,� r, (206)696-1338 , � . (503)286-9485 5, �`r s 1�, Cs-,,/-e ,.Ut-eS w1 3Qc-K3 • ' '/, DIVISION OF STATE LANDS - WETLAND DETETION DATA FORM County: t,�/°(5 1 rc, ( ( ;1 aycf) Date: '11 ., 96, File # Project/Contact: (ear^,^L?'rr,,e_ DA'J S h4-( /')'r* Det. by: ti` PW . Plant. Community: RQcl CP Li rc _ 3 Stn1.✓t_ Plot # ft'-t Plot location: SE r,r n r, v. c:t L Do normal environ. conditions exist? Y N _ Explain: Has Veg. Soil Hydrology been significantly disturbed? 1 o Explain: VEGETATION ------- Dominant Species Status X Cover Dominant Species Status X Cover Tree Stratum Herb Stratum Total Cover: 3() 4, Total Cover: /k:'C T.. 1. Ock - .-anci,s info eIo4 �1/� r.o� ,,AA-+ 1. 2. r. •c din?. r%'-M rn u i ( G r- -!- - i.r 2. P F-rol.L rJPc (.J l C.U 3. L_c'• T I-V,-c T,c,,'tl 3. 4. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum 5, Total Cover: .er 6. 1. 7, 2. 8. 3. 9. 4. 10 5. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, FAC (not FAC-): /c/) 70 Other Notable Species: Criteria Met? YES >< NO SOILS Map Unit Name: Verb<r' 't Sl CIGi,-1 66 ,--'1 Drainage Class: Taxonomy: _ On Hydric Soils List? Y X N Depth Horizon Matrix Redox Concentrations* Redox Depletions* Texture Structure Color �'C L r( r�t— enc� AoeSra (cot i+rrd. -- _ , D 'IZ )0\1(2-z) too: lot; cF ORCS ti+ ..c+,c4 plc,\ce v�0.0 ,4 I op LE,c 'aS%el'u'r� Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol Concretions/Nodules (w/in 3"; > 2mm) Histic Epipedon High organic content in surface (in Sandy Soils) _ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic streaking (in Sandy Soils) _ Reducing Conditions (tests positive) Organic pan (in Sandy Soils) ,. -6-teyed- 10•..1 Can-v''4 )( Listed on Hydric Soils List Redox. features (w/in 10") _ Other: Criteria Met? YES ✓ NO * abund./size/contrast/color/location (matrix or pores/peds) ----------- HYDROLOGY Recorded Data Recorded Data Available: _ Aerial Photos _ Stream gauge — Other _ No Recorded Data Available Field Data Depth of inundation: Depth to Saturation: Depth to free water: Primary Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Hydrology Indicators (2 or more required): _ Inundated Oxidized Root Channels (upper 12") Saturated in upper 12 inches Water-stained Leaves Water Marks _ Local Soil Survey Data Drift Lines _ FAC-Neutral Test Sediment Deposits _ Other: )_ Drainage Patterns ciD re4grf^ 1-3-6 " 6e.L,J P' 1`-,Z. C4-vi • ( �j Criteria Met? YES NO DETERMINATION `--- -- -- WETLAND? YES K NO Comments: -o-S{ v "C1-&r7 vW.ir Ice d C-›� C v�air,5 it) �� i .a 'b0 A-6( k osc U P1 -11/V n S 1 v (k ( 1rJ 1 S4 (-_,Gv 7-14C.4,4 OAC."(u d c y C cn k/ Nia psi 1416,■v-(2.. ■ 15*-1 C Ci c(apa w/ I,1CA CIc y.Prr4._ krcrte.,c,lnvV 7 , 2Qed caul 5ca-iva _6_4.e -\cJs No r tt,, Jc (-;r e 51- ro r 1 Gr` of Ite , v,i w d At--eA S 14-e. ! ,-1 7/w % - - i\e e°.A 5 -lam • �` po,A-4 o r-^C�e c Ic F-rov0c p IcLm T1 4- v,l''S ' v h,/ (-f off/ r�(✓r( ,re,ay ICJ e o 'S( 3 : n1'0 V f i cA - 19(6 c.k cry, r) 'o`"..S'r L✓1 Vel 5 (kU 49- Ash, (,plonoi) 5t-,„e �i L(0-Go i QG IL of o,ry .e s4, ccti>eir, ; ✓1C1?r a So\ ckc - rcQD I c ,rows +S So L 0 PE-- 6, 0-(,,JA s L/ t LA-16.4 S nc.0 s C ^ n �v`J (-7 CA 4- Of 94C. u �� ea sl 1 l PO s -1->1-}4,rZ �iGS nv044 ' u4or t , k'h ?/ tt(I)/ r' pc, I ca' v w I kcu► - �� w ituvo vv Q ko., Ad C(e,c,Ao-car is ; o. I(Me- )151)7o d cwA NNc,-Pd s uG.I'(e s ot4e • /,et.A.1 t L.� (o e 'iv w S-) i �-�u V( 6t Jd QaSa 1 CJ�, �c `- -1`'Po �,-/ W R 4-c e, k A, 2 51^er ar• r\CN tZ" at-NJ "CIA aAn S�-IC, , WC_ d u'S r ± ,,.1e,A.( 4-0 S, 1 J2` - n 5{cU d a _ S ti S te-f (2 -3".5 r i SC 't n c ►U�7o (NO -‘ G�S I0 - l7 ' C S'AC -k S. Q 4 Q r C) an k t y 6101-c.-k��r (I i\e I 6,c cowl i\e-5 S rat.A V;. , 4} o 5r L- n-fu IawtA Pry ovv . p +-702 0Lviaysty i\Va J..0 tf)5 bpe AD, Vv o-1 5 -(n so Coc i o- vv/ k ;, l+u w •Ipar.l 2 vsn c t,oK vet_ 60,n d°rt-5 Qr r� ca/ \ N, LnG 4 Q . {itkyerr . (1r•.4 Witt"(?) ^'yUt -f-. -tt4 wit/vp IanLl 5+4 can G PPe^rP n-I^ 4:,o1 Mcicry. \\ _ Kit 41.,,14 N i c o l- s to h'-S - fn e Apr•a"F, Z O r S u S{ct s+I H/ I k 61vc1 • cf- )- - 5a s + ve5 SP- 1, O C u+ « 51.51 rP.- , ec5y i5j , id ;1-- 0,4 CA- mammy rdk rtriA L.1 a >9„(w`5 - c/r ixr al) 5 ',- , 1 L)t --P l cu\n ce a-tut , • -...• ,....', --- - :i.t . - . , ••, • •. ':'•.''r -.:....- ,-:....,...,„:n '...•.-i-t.14-i:,4 -.•:.--,-.-.- . . pi.; , . . ..,.....5.......0' - . „ : • 1 Voile • .20'-' :--', .:. ' . ,. . , . • • • 4- id 49tAt1/4 ?Oh \ m. ,,,.. • . ................ ) 11 . - ',•,„4.4d . ;. - 7 etC.NtOtt 4 6e. 64)1\CICrtif Sim, -P.., riz.....,,.::.•-z-„,...,;:,:;..„: , A dory • 'Ty!, £ I 1) i 1 il ::::..„,. .•••:.,,,','.,..:::7-1,;-,.. ::: .•••,-, II •5 1 ler boundary is • . . . , . .• •:.,, 'e,,,,-if " .... ccievsery,71, R 0 ..:77. S. "------. 1 1 /to EXISTING CATCH BASIN ' -•.':. •• 171.62' '4•..• Ii ' ••• 7.37' • (R/W VACATED -182) , of.:s / . „7. . 40). , / , 17 1 IZI rt ..... _ 17i21 '1 ' S89 42' 30”It' ELE: 17 .40' • • ••••••■■•• • • ,••••••• •• 11=1•■••1 L'I 7.....■, ... • T...1 / /72/ . / ,-.4 „ie., ,,,,,,,,,, ,..„ ik ct. . , ,..._.... • , . Aq) i ; • A , , , . ,• , ' • -..v.t,,,,rt. ..',•;_;, , . I 1/ .,'0: ' l' NTIN: • . ,,.:;•',N,•-. 7F:.- , \ . i . •-•"71'• 4":. -rtis'ci: .4t do e7,:•.,.' ,„-I . , 1,4:::4eci.,- kivt, a T■e,',4,t!,.7'•,!'•'$ ,,i,.. I '1 ! . 1..L., I • , , `411. • . 1::;!... , 1 . ,,, ,.,, ..-44,1.4 ' , ! I i . 1 ' ' it'Atsr'lA;.,. ,:+.t.',. '. , '''' *.-..!;-'4;5 I I : ; , t rt.'+' :',..,-, Y'i, .! ' io/ - . :,'"■"; 41 1710 • . ---- . I i 1 , I , 1 '‘.`117‘176itfItIVI,'"•-1.4"'1 +t,.:40, 1 i 40' II I 1 ! i I • : ' ik.t•Li t.... P4' •%::.'.'A.:,' • - ye--_ I „ • • , • . 1 I I I . , . • . r4. , .. . : , ,,,,.. ... ..-..--,' :.:' ! " , 6''''' 'J?"-.4:4 . . . . \.S1 \ . ' '44'1' '. , * ' . /\ i • \ - :i.s..,...-:,--, • 4r'111pVit gio!. • ' 1 I • , • • .c- , '., '' t . 4 p. 7', 1 ... . 1 • . ' . 0 . , ! . , , :'..1":,,..-•".1.1 ','•):, •,•.•:,,,4, 1 • • . • • I • : kg '. '.•4k, . • I tj . i'\ , ' ____,.,. ; -I. .pr ( ® / , • : I . , . . `... I-4, `16-7*.....4.-rna4-.•••• •:'' •''''''' '' 1 Illi ! " ; I • i 1 '3.00: . . : ' CURB **-. • . , . , .•• ' I : I ' • • •. 1 • 1 . • •••.) I ! i •.... •. ' I 1 1;1 , . . ' ' . • I ! .fIlli I • • ' •: 11111 ! ! y / ..... • • . . .' ' ' ./11::: . ... • .. ••• • • •••••171.80' •••• • I L., 1 .14...... . : T-- • : , o .. .. CHR7 • . .•.... .• ...l'i I ' • 1 1. I :gy, I ...•: ... RIM.• , 0.00' eD Si I I. . I • : I I. . . I - 1 • I 1— i :••■ CO • --I I . I - . .,.. I ... i -....I I 1 tri _-I ..-. mys ./ • 4 CUM , . ...". : 0 ' • • -• _ . -. _ _ _ _ _ .-•• o ./ I'... .7) rl . • < • • , , . LANDSCAPE . . , ' ! i I: ! ' • •. (A) , i I • ' 1 ' , ' . I ' SIDEWALK • . • : I 1 • , • . I ' •.. 19*-6' . . - N • • . . . . . • , . ) ,.....i. • , . . • . WALL 2 , , t . (A: \ . •• . I v• I . • J- I • , , macmpr.ftm ./.../, g2 : „ I •- . 1 • RAMP TO GRADE /////// I I ‘ 108.-0- 4.■ %I. 4111. , 1 172.0' NOT TO EXCEED 6.33 / • /.0////// ........'"4I 71.0: . : ••■ N‘W" Iv •B .[ ;•,., . 11 17... -- • • OPOSED DAYCARE 71 / .----7- 25 SF•2'DEEP , \‘'\ )1 011 ', .x s• • •2 CY FILL IN 6 4 8 0 5 F I FLOCO PLAN: ! ! ! : \\N ■ ' ' . . •wiDE •s RETE wAuc . I ' 11 1 ' . . 1 . • . 1 I • ilill ' H . • ELE: 1 73.00' . I ' I . i i ; i t • ! 1 .• . 0 • , \A , • i . , , , ! , , • 6"PVC RAIN DRAIN 1.4111— .• PVC • ' ! I , . ' 5'•1 54% \I • I I. 1 : 1 I to I ., . dl , .■ ■ .., . ' . I 1 ' 1 I 0 I ''.`; 11'• '' . 1 1 I o • S•CONC WALK i ' 1 1 I i o • • 4' I ! , ! i • : t 1 • 1 ; : o ' ' ■ : I tr) 1 - . /__ . . V.S• I : , RAMP 0 GRAVE • , 1129r1(.....41) -' • S / LAMING(TYP.) ; . NOT 0 EXCEED 13. % 66.3•' ! . ' •-•-•i‘ t i ' ; - . ' , i • • I 0. TOP =Mil. APER '.A 1 : II 1, o ! 1 : • • I , ::•■•■•••3. t•:':•:•:••• •: 1 / CPOF ! l ' . . 3 I 0 . / --' ••:•:•:•.• :•:•:•:•:• :• ! / , . • . . I 1 i / i 1 i I ' . i • i‘ . ) ■ . f : • 's PLAY AREA 1 •:•:•:•BO • OF POND ; , ' 1.5.::::i ELE: .6-3;' \ • • . . , 1 i , ; , , i . • .::.:..• ,-. • • ...- . I , / I. •.• • . . • • • . .• .•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:• , . ii 1 , , . C........_____ _ _ - __ • ii • ' ' I " .:: ':::::::::::' 179.21 ' v_cr HIGH SIGHT •: ••:•:••••••••• ' : : .•:::;:::;:;::: OBSCMING Ft!'" , I i . t:•.'46 kriACHio: y I : ! . TO EXISTING GARA ' . .......... SS9 42' 30"WC2 ..:EXSITING ..:::. 1 •:SHED •:• t 7-7----------"'l / I ; , I ,,... . LE:169 1 I \ \ '2 EXISTING CATCH BASIN RIM-169.06• . I (-/ V‘t- (°1-- \\\ 1 INV.•16S..34* ' ! 1 • I , II . . ; • • . , . ' 1 ' 1 I : • i ' i ; ____..-----, , , . •. • i ' I • \ \ 2 I , ! ! ! ! ! • II . ; I • : . • .., , , : i 1 . 1 • , -, ' • ' •,,,, .-1,'..,.,,-....-•,, ,. , , . ',H I.y'il LOi OD. PLAIN E. \LEVAI, O—N = 169.00' •. I !, ....,.„.. • l 1 1 , I NO NET FILL ir, FsLqa-i,PLAIN. 1 ! i I i I ! I ' ! : FLOOD PLAIN . 169:00'. • I•- •:-.4 .. , •. - -i' 1-.• (1.61[(15)(30)](40X24)/(2)(27) - 42 CY I t• . •... .... ..._ ,•••■•■•A-we-fr■ •II A-rent A I nr.an%,irr I tt..r u :It, 11J. .7. Hn PULLt.h" '.7.. . ... At . - •...1 if, / . , ,• ' . - SANITARY SERVICE, INC. FAX TRANSMISSION DATE : ,--,- , ,. ., . FAX .. ,.,,BL. R.: (56 3) 3.?c - 9-3 i FR-.)Y : 4111211-11AL),.. - FAX NUMBER: 6L3-31,52 CU leuvra4 t crA_ Alt 9 ie.) :F THERE AR'7 ANY FROELEq W-T TH.7", TRANSMITTAL, ?LEAS'.' CAL: MILLER ' S SANITARY SERVICE , INC . AT (503 ) 644-616 : . li. SSAGE : 71./.?5 1 m._ `-/-i(4 (i.. iv / c * - eictl. ' TAIL ibct •,,____g____1- .isi (4 LI So A-ti-e , - - =I OF ?AGES : ;1. 777 (. .:: 2D:NG COVER SEE7I) P.O. BOX 217 • BEAVERTON, OREGON 97C75-0217 • (503) 644-6161 - •. ,77 - - Date : Dear Sirs, We have reviewed your plan and/or attachments for the proposed - development at ...LOZ,L.6_0_ and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions : AL° Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal cf these materials for our review. MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . • .n .� iv•��. r.� WILLIAM L. OWEN .1 ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services P.O. BOX 641, POKY LAN n,OREGON 972(; 603," 2-7007 May 14, 1996 Kaufman Homes Attention: Gary Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE Salem, OR 97306-1043 RE: Learning Tree Day School Project 10360 SW 87th Street Tigard, OR Dear Mr. Kaufman: This is to acknowledge that I have been retained by you as Arboricultural Consultant on the subject project, to serve from beginning to completion of the facility. My services will cover developing a tree preservation plan as well as all other necessary functions to maximize tree preservation on the site. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very truly yo William L. Owen, B.S., M A., C.A. • American Society of Consulting Arborists 4114 ,. INSPF..CTION,DIAGNOSIS AND 2vAl.::A T;ON OF TRE:S,SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLA?s?ING,TRANSPL NT.NG.PRESERVATION.MAINTENANCE AND �y �"� ARBOREAL.PLANNING.(CMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS.DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS. �'[ jV )RGAL.OR CONTRACTUAL PUF.PGSES LEGALLY ACCEaTABLE TEST1MO?Y IN COURT GASES ' WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES AcA ' ,;;_ Tree and Landscape Consulting Services ! P.O. BOX 641,PORTLAND,OREGON 97207 503/222-7007 a V I ,: (.2�V (.6) July 2, 1996 Kaufman Homes Attention: Gary Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE Salem, OR 97306-1043 RE: Hall Boulevard Day Care Center Tree Preservation Plan Dear Mr. Kaufman: Per your orders I have inspected the subject project site on two occasions and examined the trees located there for the purpose of ascertaining their basic conditions and their prognosis for survival with respect to the building project which you have planned on the site. In conformance with the City of Tigard's tree preservation requirements, I have examined the trees visually to meet the Tree Removal Plan Requirements of city code, section 18.150.025 (see copy enclosed). Based on the requirements, and my inspection of the trees on the site, and the drawings supplied to me by you showing the plot plan, building, parking lot and driveway locations, I can report the following: 1) I located 26 trees on the site, which are numbered on the enclosed plot plan and identified in the following schedule. Some trees were misidentified on the plot plan. All measurements are taken at 4.5' above ground. Tree list numbers are keyed to plot plan enclosed. #1 A 10" Dogwood. The species is resilient and this is a decent specimen. Though it does not fall into the tree preservation requirements since it is under 12" in diameter, it is mentioned because it is a good tree and can be preserved. #2 A multi-stem Ash with a composite dimension of approximately 14". A reasonably good specimen which can be preserved and will escape the building. #3 Multi-stem Ash, four stems, approximately 8" each in diameter. A decent tree worth preserving. It is in the playground, as are trees#1 and#2. Fvi -,- r1 INSPECTION.DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF TREES.SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS. .•j1-«. , + CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING.TRANSPLANTING.PRESERVATION.MAINTENANCE AND ',.-.1:7i, 4, ARBOREAL PLANNING.COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS.DULY SANCTIONED APPRAISALS FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES.LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES. rr '� ,; O t� Z- 1s ? 1 Kaufman p Gary EM OV6 l Page 2 �L(3 R o 10 Ai. July 18, 1996 ��SE '#4 Cponderosa Pine which will be taken out by the building construction. It is thin the building envelope. .n. #5 26" Ash, in decline, with major decay in the main stem. This tree should not be 001 left standing as proposed on the plot plan. If this is to be a children's playground .%JCL+)Pt- area, the tree should be removed as a potential hazard. #6 6" Dogwood of good character and condition. It falls below the size requirement for the city to be preserved, but it is a decent tree and can remain. It can be an amenity to the playground area if properly lift-pruned to prevent children from climbing it. a '#7 40" v ak shown to be removed. Located too close to the retention drainage pond T" v ther construction. v#8 " ine located within the building envelope and must be removed. #9 Multi-stemmed Ash with substantial decay and rot in two of the larger stems. It is shown to be within the parking lot and has to be removed. It is not a tree worth retaining even if it were not in the parking lot. ./#10 (24"_Pine in the building envelope. Must be removed. ,'#11 (2491- 24"Pine in the building envelope. Must be removed. -#12 (i-iiPine in the building envelope. Must be removed. x#13 20" amine located at the base of tree #12, very close to the building. It can not sustain the construction. Must be removed. ✓#l4 (.3T ine located on the building foundation line. Will have to be removed. ,7#15 21" Oak of decent character and condition. It can be preserved since its location falls between the proposed sidewalk and the front of the building. This tree can and should be preserved. #16 Is shown as an Oak tree but is a Double-Stemmed Cherry of no character and poor condition, on the edge of the north side of the driveway, near 87th Street. Cannot be retained due to driveway construction. It is no loss to the property. Kaufinan Construcnon/WLO&Assoc#9634 '' Gary Kaufman Page 3 July 18, 1996 4f17 (19,X5ak in the center of the proposed driveway on the north side of the building. Cannot be preserved. #18 A double-stemmed large Ash with substantial decay and loss of integrity in the stems. It is a hazard and should be removed, even though it is in the area which is to be left undisturbed, not slated for any use. Trees of this kind can be an attractive nuisance, and, since there is bazar resent now, the tree should be removed. #19 33" Ash with some decay low in the stem but possibly preservable with professional care. It should not be retained if this area is in any way open to foot e traffic and/or school children. It is marginal as of this time as to hazard condition V "abundance has hazard potential. As an abundance of caution," I would recommend to remove the tree. #20 A double-stemmed Ash, 11" - 15" diameter,with substantial decay in the stems. It is hazardous and should be removed. A21 36" Pine in good condition. It can and should be retained as an amenity to the property. #22 6" Pear tree. Below the tree requirements for the City of Tigard but is a decent tree and can be retained. #23 11" Apple tree of the same character and quality as tree#22. It is smaller than the requirements for tree consideration but can be retained. #24 11" Maple of decent character and stable growth habit. Even though it falls below the tree requirement measurement, it can be retained as an amenity. X425 15" English Walnut of good character and stability. This tree can be retained. ,-26 19" Grand Fir of good character, in a position to be retained. This is a handsome tree and will benefit the site as an amenity on the northwest face of the property near the driveway entrance. 2) The trees slated for preservation which will be impacted by the construction directly or indirectly through moving of equipment, material, etc. are trees#1, 2, 3, 6, 15, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26. All other trees on the site will have to be removed by the building,parking lot or driveway construction as shown on the plot plan. Kaufman Construction/WLO&Assoc#9634 Gary Kaufman Page 4 July 18, 1996 3) The arboricultural, tree preservation therapies necessary for preservable trees close to the building will be developed on site during the construction process by the Consulting Arborist working with the construction contractor. Therapy as may be needed will be prescribed at the time of construction beginning with grading of the property and working through to completion, based on situational impact on each of the trees. 4) The prognosis for survival for the trees shown to be preservable is very good. The trees in the north section of the property, north of the driveway, in the open area not slated for impact by construction, will not be placed at risk by construction but will require certain maintenance and safety precaution tree work which will be prescribed by the Consulting Arborist as the work on the trees more impacted by the construction is done (see paragraph#2 above). In that manner, not only will the possibility for survival of trees closely impacted be greatly enhanced, but also trees not as heavily impacted but still remaining on the site can be left in as good and as safe condition as modem arboriculture can leave them. 5) The Consulting Arborist must meet with the construction contractor early on, before construction begins, to go over the plans for specific tree preservation therapies on the site. The Consulting Arborist will then work with the construction contractor, beginning with the grading contractor and continuing through with the construction Superintendent, to insure that preservation practices are in place and the trees are protected throughout. 6) All work prescribed by the Consulting Arborist will be to ANSI A300 Standards for pruning, and National Arborist Association Standards for fertilizing, and will be prescribed by the Consulting Arborist at the time the construction impact on each tree is known fully. See Standards enclosed. In summary, based on my understanding of the requirements as shown in the ordinance, and my discussions with you relative to the project, I believe this report is sufficient to provide for your needs at this time. Should you need additional information please advise me immediately and it will be provided, forthwith. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, � if// s / William L. Owen, B.S., M.A. C.A. M. - American Society of Consulting Arborists#114 Kaufman Construction/WLO&Assoc#9634 WILLIAM L. OWEN and ASSOCIATES Tree and Landscape Consulting Services "rL> P.O.BOX 641,PORTLAND,OREGON 97207 503/222-7007 (-V V') July 2, 1996 Kaufman Homes Attention: Gary Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE Salem, OR 97306-1043 RE: Hall Boulevard Day Care Center Tree Preservation Plan Dear Mr. Kaufman: Per your orders I have inspected the subject project site on two occasions and examined the trees located there for the purpose of ascertaining their basic conditions and their prognosis for survival with respect to the building project which you have planned on the site. In conformance with the City of Tigard's tree preservation requirements, I have examined the trees visually to meet the Tree Removal Plan Requirements of city code, section 18.150.025 (see copy enclosed). Based on the requirements, and my inspection of the trees on the site, and the drawings supplied to me by you showing the plot plan, building, parking lot and driveway locations, I can report the following: 1) I located 26 trees on the site, which are numbered on the enclosed plot plan and identified in the following schedule. Some trees were misidentified on the plot plan. All measurements are taken at 4.5' above ground. Tree list numbers are keyed to plot plan enclosed. #1 A 10" Dogwood. The species is resilient and this is a decent specimen. Though it does not fall into the tree preservation requirements since it is under 12" in diameter, it is mentioned because it is a good tree and can be preserved. #2 A multi-stem Ash with a composite dimension of approximately 14". A reasonably good specimen which can be preserved and will escape the building. #3 Multi-stem Ash, four stems, approximately 8" each in diameter. A decent tree worth preserving. It is in the playground, as are trees#1 and#2. INSPECTION,DIAGNOSIS AND EVALUATION OF TREES,SHRUBS AND RELATED PLANTINGS. v'�...1/4:; CONSULTATION WITH RESPECT TO PLANTING.TRANSPLANTING,PRESERVATION.MAINTENANCE AND '�''►'!�'4;i': '" ARBOREAL PLANNING.COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OR DAMAGE REPORTS.DULY SAN(TIONED APPRAISALS FOR LEGAL OR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES.LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE TESTIMONY IN COURT CASES. Gary Kaufman Page 2 July 18, 1996 #4 32" Ponderosa Pine which will be taken out by the building construction. It is within the building envelope. #5 26" Ash, in decline, with major decay in the main stem. This tree should not be left standing as proposed on the plot plan. If this is to be a children's playground area, the tree should be removed as a potential hazard. #6 6" Dogwood of good character and condition. It falls below the size requirement for the city to be preserved, but it is a decent tree and can remain. It can be an amenity to the playground area if properly lift-pruned to prevent children from climbing it. #7 40" Oak shown to be removed. Located too close to the retention drainage pond and other construction. #8 26" Pine located within the building envelope and must be removed. #9 Multi-stemmed Ash with substantial decay and rot in two of the larger stems. It is shown to be within the parking lot and has to be removed. It is not a tree worth retaining even if it were not in the parking lot. #10 24" Pine in the building envelope. Must be removed. #11 24" Pine in the building envelope. Must be removed. #12 24" Pine in the building envelope. Must be removed. #13 20" Pine located at the base of tree#12, very close to the building. It can not sustain the construction. Must be removed. #14 34" Pine located on the building foundation line. Will have to be removed. #15 21" Oak of decent character and condition. It can be preserved since its location falls between the proposed sidewalk and the front of the building. This tree can and should be preserved. #16 Is shown as an Oak tree but is a Double-Stemmed Cherry of no character and poor condition, on the edge of the north side of the driveway, near 87th Street. Cannot be retained due to driveway construction. It is no loss to the property. Kaufman Construction/WLO&Assoc#9634 ag 3 aufman July 18, 1996 #17 Ig" akin #18 Clot be preserved. °f the 8 sterns.19"Oak i proposed driveway o to le f}t IS a ha2ardlge`ash with n the north side of attractive undisturbed,tined d should h substant the building t nuisance,inot slat be removed, ecay #19 removed. and' since slated for any us even though d loss°f integrity ,r Ash so re is hazard present? s°f d s k n the the traffic professional card It�ecaYlowin noyv, the�e o an which is but h and/or school decay l not the stem b u1d be remove hh d potential.l children. It be retained f ps area is i an to #2 p A double-stemmed As an "abundance aar of area in preservable with It is hazardous mmed Ash, 11 f caution,"I W as t0 hazard n t oot #21 36„Pine in and shod be ref S"diameter, recommend condition amete n good c moved subs #22 property. g°o condition. It �ntraldecayi 22 an in treeear tree. d should retained the sterns, #23 and can be retained. tree e u. rued as an amenity requirements tree th 9 Irelnents for the ite c the Apple C #24 9uirelnents for same character City of Tigard but is II"maple consideration brand quality a decent #2 the tree requirement d decent character but can be retained.e#22' It is S 1 S„English w nt measurement,racte and stable growth habit. smaller than the #26 19„Grid Walnut°fgOOd chard an�retained as an Even though i tree and Fir of g°° character and amenity. t falls be/ow c stability. w 2) The near the driveway ewa entrance.the character,in a position s tree c indirectly trees slated for preservation Y as an amenity n the be retained be retained aoSand 26°u movi which nOhwest face of a hands°rne r driveway All fe will the try rte through construction metro o equipment,lnt,neat Patted by :: nstmction Pe as sho u'i11 h etc are n av f#�3the Plotp�an removed b 2, 3, 6 directly or y the building,'P 2,23, long Gary Kaufman Page 4 July 18, 1996 3) The arboricultural, tree preservation therapies necessary for preservable trees close to the building will be developed on site during the construction process by the Consulting Arborist working with the construction contractor. Therapy as may be needed will be prescribed at the time of construction beginning with grading of the property and working through to completion, based on situational impact on each of the trees. 4) The prognosis for survival for the trees shown to be preservable is very good. The trees in the north section of the property, north of the driveway, in the open area not slated for impact by construction, will not be placed at risk by construction but will require certain maintenance and safety precaution tree work which will be prescribed by the Consulting Arborist as the work on the trees more impacted by the construction is done (see paragraph #2 above). In that manner, not only will the possibility for survival of trees closely impacted be greatly enhanced, but also trees not as heavily impacted but still remaining on the site can be left in as good and as safe condition as modern arboriculture can leave them. 5) The Consulting Arborist must meet with the construction contractor early on, before construction begins, to go over the plans for specific tree preservation therapies on the site. The Consulting Arborist will then work with the construction contractor, beginning with the grading contractor and continuing through with the construction Superintendent, to insure that preservation practices are in place and the trees are protected throughout. 6) All work prescribed by the Consulting Arborist will be to ANSI A300 Standards for pruning, and National Arborist Association Standards for fertilizing, and will be prescribed by the Consulting Arborist at the time the construction impact on each tree is known fully. See Standards enclosed. In summary, based on my understanding of the requirements as shown in the ordinance, and my discussions with you relative to the project, I believe this report is sufficient to provide for your needs at this time. Should you need additional information please advise me immediately and it will be provided, forthwith. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, William L. Owen, B.S., M.A. C.A. American Society of Consulting Arborists #114 Kaufman Construction/WLO&Assoc#9634 MAP 08 '96 10:30 KAUFMAN HOMES P.3 Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the --, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. - .•-1 •-v-1..m- i • • i.i -. :a •, floodolains, In most cases, dedication of 100- year floodplain areas to the City for par -nd open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared oy a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or comoination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, pianned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal Over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires 18.150.070.0; Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed de mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; identification of all trees wr ch are proposed to be removed: and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1 ) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.0. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) CITY OF TTGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON AcsbesTtl 31.1141,19,11 Sera. PE JNING STAN [ RDS With the American National Standard for pruning, ANSI A300, specifications can be written in a virtual infinite number of combinations. The following information is designed to help you understand exactly what will be accomplished in a pruning operation. Branch Size A minimum or maximum diameter size of branches to be removed should be specified in all pruning operations. This establishes how much pruning is to be done. Pruning Objectives Pruning objectives should be established prior to beginning any pruning operation. A300 provides two basic objectives. Hazard Reduction Pruning Hazard reduction pruning (HRP) is recommended when the primary objective is to reduce the danger to a specific target caused by visibly defined hazards in a tree. For example, HRP may be the primary objective if a tree had many dead limbs over a park bench. Maintenance Pruning Maintenance pruning (MP) is recommended when the primary objective is to maintain or improve tree health and structure, and includes hazard reduction pruning. An example here might be to perform a MP operation on a front yard tree. Pruning Types Hazard reduction pruning and maintenance pruning should consist of one or more of the pruning types noted below. Crown cleaning....Crown cleaning shall consist of the selective removal of one or more of the following items: dead, dying, or diseased branches, weak branches and watersprouts. Crown thinning....Crown thinning shall consist of the selective removal of branches to increase light penetration, air movement, and reduce weight. Crown raising....Crown raising shall consist of the removal of the lower branches of a tree to provide clearance. Crown Reduction, or Crown Shaping....Crown Reduction decreases the height and/or spread of a tree. Consideration should be given to the ability of a species to sustain this type of pruning. Vista Pruning....Vista Pruning is selective thinning of framework limbs or specific areas of the crown to allow a view of an object from a predetermined point. Crown Restoration....Crown Restoration pruning should improve the structure, form and appearance of trees which have been severely headed, vandalized, or storm damaged. - over - Example Specifications 1 Tree: 24 inch dbh Oak in back yard of residence. Maintenance Prune - Crown clean 2 inches or greater, crown thin branch in east side over pool. (� Trees: Nine, 20 to 25 inch silver maples on � �, r street. Hazard Reduction Prune - Crown clean 3 inches or greater, Crown raise to 15 feet (Figures 1 & 2). � .. Tree: 30 inch White Pine in back yard, overlooking sea. Maintenance Prune - Crown Clean 2 inches or greater, Vista Prune south side to improve �l view of sea. Tree: 10 inch Redbud in front yard. Main- tenance Prune-Crown thin, 1/2 inch or greater. Figure 1 (above). Tree•before pruning. Tree: 19 inch red maple in back yard. Haz- Figure 2 (below). Tree after Hazard and Reduction Prune - Crown clean Reduction Prune - Crown clean 3 inches dead wood only 2 inches or greater, or greater, Crown raise to 15 feet Crown reduction prune away from antenna on house. The American National Standard for tree pruning is ANSI A300. Its development process was approved by the American Na- tional Standards In- stitute. This prun- Alt ing standard should 'R be followed where 1 possible in all prun- y' ing situations to re- To , M main consistent with r r r,seryaandoterrwoody industry standards. , C P(antMointrnancr- zStandard Procricrt Please note that the ;c A300 standard has been drafted to ad- dress pruning speci- Q + --------- fications across all '1 geographic areas. Knowledge of the growth habits of certain tree species within a given environment may alter how the recommendations of A300 are interpreted. NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION Standard for Fertilizing Shade & Ornamental Trees (Revised 1987) INTRODUCTION This standard serves to provide a guide in drafting specifications for the application of fertilizer to shade and ornamental trees as well as a standard of practice. Trees in the forest or commercial nursery, either field or container grown, may have different environmental considerations and are not addressed in this standard. It is suggested that the entire text be read before specifications are developed. All of the following should be included-soil test, type of fertilizer, fertilizer analysis, rate of application, time of year, and method of application. The purpose of fertilizing landscape plants is to maintain satisfactory vigor, promote healthy growth, assist the plant in overcoming the adverse effects of diseases or insects,or to correct mineral element deficiencies. Plants require at least sixteen chemical elements for proper growth and development. Three of these elements — carbon, hydrogen and oxygen — are provided by air and water;the other essential elements are obtained by the roots from the soil.Nitrogen is used in large amounts by plants,is easily leached and often volatile. It may be necessary to apply nitrogen annually or biennially.Variations in methods and recommendations are expected in different regions. Therefore, it is recommended that soil be tested every two to three years.The test will report quantities of chemical elements: calcium, phosphorus,potassium and magnesium.The test will also provide a pH reading,which is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of the soil.The actual soil pH influences nutrient absorption and plant growth through the effect of hydrogen ions on nutrient availability. Each essential nutrient is only available to plants within a specific pH range. The presence of a chemical element(nutrient)in the soil is no guarantee that it is in a soluble form available for plant absorption. The concentration of hydrogen and associated ions affects soil reaction and the formation of soluble and insoluble compounds. All nutrients must be in solution to be available for root absorption. Foliar analysis for determination of chemical element needs is recommended for trees showing specific nutrient deficiencies. It is possible to have a soil test indicate that adequate levels of all nutrients are present in a soil and still have nutrient deficiency symptoms appear on a plant. The nutrient may occur in a form that is unavailable to the plant. There may also be physical problems within the soil, such as compaction, poor drainage, or poor aeration that can affect nutrient absorption. SECTION A: TYPES OF FERTILIZER I Organic Fertilizer — is that categorized as derived from a plant, animal or synthetic organic source. Nitrogen (N) occurs naturally in organic fertilizers (manures), and gradually becomes available for plant use as the material is reduced by microorganisms. Synthetic organic nitrogen fertilizers are created by coating urea with sulphur or resin-like materials which make the material slowly available for plant use. Organic fertilizers are characterized by a slow rate of nitrogen release, long residual, low burn and root injury potential, and low water solubility. The higher efficiency of slow release fertilizers means less nitrogen runoff to contribute to pollution of streams and subsurface water.The unit cost of slow release fertilizer absorbed by the plant is actually lower than that of readily available materials. I I. Inorganic(Chemical) Fertilizer— is that derived from chemical sources. These nutrients are readily available in the soil and are rapidly soluble, with a short residual period. III. Soluble Fertilizer—is mixed with water and applied in liquid form. Soluble fertilizers may be applied to the foliage,to the soil via the deep root feeding method, or as a soil drench treatment. Soluble fertilizers are usually inorganic and readily available, but may be organic and slowly available. Materials with a limited solubility that dissolve slowly are often listed on fertilizer labels as water insoluble nitrogen — WIN (See EXAMPLE I. page C-5 for WIN calculations). SECTION B: FERTILIZER ANALYSIS I New Plantings — use a high phosphorus fertilizer to assist in plant establishment, such as those with nitrogen, phosphorus and potash (N-P-K) ratios of 0-20-0, 0-46-0, 4-12-4, or 5-10-5. C-1 • • I I Established Plantings—use fertilizers with N-P-K ratios of 3-1-2 or 3-1-1 for best response. These formulations may be supplemented with trace elements as local conditions dictate. Nitrogen fertilizers such as 21-0-0, 38-0-0 or 45-0-0 can be applied if soil analysis indicates no other nutrients are required. Inorganic (water soluble) nitrogen fertilizers should be applied annually.Very little available nitrogen remains in the soil from year to year, since most of it is either used by plants when available or carried away by water. Synthetic or organic nitrogen (WIN) may be applied biennially due to its slow availability. Phosphorus and potassium are chemically bound to the soil and become slowly available through several growing seasons. They should be included in fertilizer application in most cases, every 2-3 years in either spring or fall, whichever is more convenient. In light-textured or sandy loam soils, potassium must be applied annually. Soil tests every 2-3 years are a must when using nitrogen fertilizers. SECTION C: RATES OF APPLICATION Importance of Proper Rates—the rates suggested in this Standard should only be used as a guideline for fertilizing trees. Specific soils and foliar test recommendations from university or private testing labs should be followed when available. Good judgement is necessary to determine whether frequency, rate, or methods should vary in given situations.Trees of the same species may respond differently to rates of fertilizer due to location in the landscape,soil conditions, rainfall, and other environmental factors. Actual fertilizer rates should be adjusted after considering on-site inspections of foliage color, previous stem or twig growth,general health of the tree,or other environmental factors. I Transplanting—fertilization at time of transplanting is recommended to assist in plant re-establishment and to supply phosphorus necessary for root growth because that element moves very slowly in soils.Apply 10 lbs.of phosphate- containing fertilizer, such as 0-20-20, 0-46-0, 4-12-4, or 5-10-5 per cubic yard of backfill. A rate of 10 lbs. of super phosphate per cubic yard is approximately equal to 0.5 lb. fertilizer per bushel of backfill. I I. Established Plantings— a) Square foot method— For optimum plant growth, it is generally recommended to apply 3 lbs. of actual nitrogen per 1,000 sq. ft. of area under the branch spread of the tree per year, or 6 lbs. every two years. If foliage color, annual growth or general vigor is not normal,increase annual application rate to 5-6 lbs.The surface area under the circular branch spread of a tree can be calculated as follows: Surface area= Radius2 x 3.14. The radius is the distance from the trunk to the edge of the branch spread.As an example,a tree with a total branch spread of 36 feet would have a radius of 18 feet. The area, according to the formula, would equal 18 x 18 x 3.14, or 1,017 sq. ft. Considering the recommendation of 3 lbs. of actual nitrogen per 1,000 sq. ft., one would apply about 17 lbs. of 18-5-11 fertilizer:3.0=0.18 x 16.6 lbs. Caution:If the area under the circular branch spread contains impervious surfaces, such as walks, drives, and foundations, then judgement should be exercised as to whether to use the square foot method for calculation. Reduced soil area does not diminish a tree's need for fertilizer; however, over-application of fertilizer can cause sod and tree root damage.Alternative fertilizing methods may have to be utilized. b) Diameter Breast High (DBH) — Measure the trunk diamater at 41/2 feet above grade. Generally for optimum growth,apply 1/4 lb.actual nitrogen per inch DBH to trees under 6 inches in diameter.The rate can be increased to 1/2 lb. N per inch DBH for most trees over 6 inches DBH. Fertilizing trees using the DBH formula results in similar quantities as the surface area method. Using the same 6 inch DBH tree as above and fertilizing with 1 lb.actual N per inch DBH would require 16.7 lbs. of 18-5-11: 6 inches(dia.) x 0.5 lb./inch(rate) = 3.0 lb.(amount of N). 3.0 lb.(amount of N) = 0.18 (%N in 18-5-11) = 16.7 lbs. of 18-5-11. Caution: With trees growing in restricted areas such as sidewalk strips, planters, etc. the square foot method is preferable to the DBH method. c) Liquid application— Dilute fertilizer solutions should be applied at the rate recommended by the manufacturer according to operating pressure and flow rate of the equipment to be used. Apply sufficient liquid mixture to supply the required rate of fertilizer as determined by the surface area of DBH method. It is suggested that one apply 150 gallons to each 2,000 sq. ft. of surface area. Inject approximately 1 gallon of fertilizer solution per injection at 2'/2 ft. spacings. C-2 a 1 Square foot method: Apply 5 lbs. of N per 1.000 sq. ft. to trees on the lawn using 32-7-7 formulated fertilizer. Calculation: 5.0 (lbs. N) _ .32 (% N) = 15.6 (lbs. 32-7-7 fertilizer) 15.6 lbs. fertilizer x 2 = 31 lbs. of fertilizer added to each 150 gal. of water. Each 150 gal. of water covers 2,000 sq. ft. if pump pressure is 150 Igs. and injection spacing is 21/2 ft. The pump can be calibrated by counting the seconds it takes to pump' gallon of solution into a bucket.Each operator should calibrate his pump, counting off the seconds, and use this same count and cadence while injecting the probe into the soil. 2. Diameter at Breast Height Method: Apply 1 lb.of N per caliper inch to trees on lawn using a 32-10-5 formulated fertilizer. Calculation: .5 (amount of N/inch cal.0 _ .32 (%of N in 32-10-5) = 15.6 lb. of fertilizer. 15.6 lbs. of fertilizer x 2= 31 lbs. of fertilizer added to each 150 gal. of water and applied as per grid above in surface application problem. SECTION D: TIMING OF FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS All of the following guidelines are subject to regional and climatological differences.Autumn is an ideal time to fertilize,generally after the first hard freeze and until the moisture in the soil freezes and root activity ceases. In the southern areas of the country where the ground does not freeze,root growth in many cases will continue all winter long.Early spring,before budbreak is also an appropriate time.When leaves have fully expanded,fertilizing can continue until early July. However,treatments of readily available inorganic nitrogen between July and September could promote a late flush of growth which may not harden off before freezing temperatures in autumn, and injury could occur. Mid to late-summer fertilizer applications should be limited to correcting specific element deficiency problems. SECTION E: METHODS OF FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS I. Surface applications—Fertilizer is placed in a spreader calibrated to apply the proper amount of material per 1,000 sq. ft.Care should be taken to avoid excessive overlapping.The application can be made in either concentric circles or in linear strips starting 2 or 3 feet from the trunk out to 5 to 10 feet beyond the drip line of the tree. Only fertilizer sources that contain nitrogen alone should be surface applied.Fertilizer should be applied when grass blades are dry.After the fertilizer has been distributed, it should be washed off the grass blades immediately,using a lawn sprinkler or irrigation system. Fertilizer remaining on grass blades that become wet following a light rain or dew formation occasionally causes burning. To prevent the soil from becoming deficient in phosphorus or potassium following annual surface applications of nitrogen, it is desirable to add these nutrients as needed according to soil analysis. Without soil reports, the NAA suggests phosphorus at 3.6 lbs.of phosphoric acid (P205)per 1,000 sq.ft.and potassium at 6 lbs.of potash (K20)per 1,000 sq. ft. Phosphorus will not burn grass if used at recommended rates. Phosphorus should be applied with the drill hole or liquid injection method because it is so insoluble and does not move down to the roots if applied as a surface treatment. Caution: potassium and nitrogen may burn turfgrass when applied at recommended rates. Irrigation of lawn areas should follow surface applications of these fertilizers. II. Drill Hole Method—The drill holes should be placed in concentric circles in the soil around the tree beginning 2-3 feet or more from the trunk and extending 5-10 feet or more beyond the drip line. Space holes 2 feet apart and drill them 8-15 inches deep, depending upon the tree species, root growth patterns, and type of soil in the root area. The recommended rate of fertilizer should be uniformly distributed among the holes. Depending on the diameter of the hole,it can be filled following fertilization with peat moss,calcine clay,perlite,small crushed stone,sand,or other soil amendment. If the area beneath the spread of the branches is restricted,reduce the application in proportion to the area or number of holes that cannot be made. Use a suitable measuring device and a funnel to apply the fertilizer in the holes. If desirable in sodded areas,the holes may be closed by pressing from different angles with the heel of the worker's shoe,or by cutting and lifting a plug of grass,filling the hole to within 4 inches of the top,adding soil and replacing the plug. Keep the fertilizer at least 4 inches below the top of the hole in turf areas to prevent burning of the grass by dehydration.Irrigation following fertilizer application will help prevent iojttry to turf; however,do not flood the area,as dissolved fertilizer may be carried to the surface and cause turf injury. C-3 When fertilizing trees that contain shrub or herbaceous plant beds within the root area of trees,care must be taken not to punch holes closer than 6 inches to the crown of small plants.Azaleas and other plants have been injured or killed by fertilizer in holes placed too close to the plants. The opening of the soil that results from use of the drill hole method allows for penetration of both water and air This increase in soil oxygen supply is often as valuable as the addition of fertilizer. III Liquid Injection Method — Injections using a soil probe or lance should be 21/2 feet apart, and 8-12 inches deep for trees. Begin lance injection 2-3 feet from the tree trunk,and work out 5-10 feet beyond the drip line of the branches. Use a hydraulic sprayer at 100-200 lbs. pressure and a soil lance designed for liquid fertilizer with a manual shut off valve and three or four horizontal discharge holes at 90 degrees in its point. Inject half a gallon of fertilizer solution into each hole. The addition of water to dry soil as occurs during the liquid injection process is an excellent side-benefit. IV Foliar Sprays— To correct minor element deficiencies,spraying liquid fertilizer on the foliage should be considered, especially for correcting iron deficiency using chelated iron. This method should not be regarded as an adequate means of providing all the necessary mineral eV nts required by major element-deficient plants in the amounts necessary for satisfactory growth. Micronutrient spray applications are most effective when made just before or during a period of active growth,usually from spring to early summer. Response,as indicated by greening of chlorotic foliage and normal growth coming from buds on affected shoots,is usually observed from 2 to 8 weeks after treatment, but response time varies. Factors in response time include the plant species,age of plant and its parts,time of year, severity of the deficiency and soil conditions under which plants are growing.One or two applications during the year will generally prevent or control deficiencies, but under some conditions, it may be necessary to make several treatments annually to maintain healthy growth. V Trunk Injections and Implants — These methods are used for specific element deficiencies, particularly iron or manganese, as well as for trees growing where there is restricted soil surface area under the drip line. Injections or implants should be made as low as possible on the trunk.Normally,this is done with a clean,sharp drill of the appropriate size. Capsules should be implanted beneath the bark and completely into the xylem tissue. Early spring before growth starts is the best time for trunk implants and injections. Wound closure is most rapid from spring treatment. Trees under 4 inches in diameter should not be treated with injection or capsule implants. Do not inject or implant when soil moisture is low as severe foliar burning may occur. SECTION F: ADDITIONAL FERTILIZER GUIDELINES Proper and timely applications of fertilizer will produce beneficial results on most trees. Newly established trees will grow more rapidly following fertilization with a nutrient or combination of nutrients that previously were present in only limited amounts in the soil. The results are shown in increased leaf size, length of current season twig growth,and more rapid increase in height. Slow-growing tree species may also be stimulated to grow faster by fertilizing. Abnormal leaf color and small leaf size often indicate nutrient deficiencies in the soil.Various colors or patterns of color indicate deficiencies of specific essential nutrients. The leaves of many trees become darker green following fertilization, making them more conspicuous and attractive. Fertilizing can help maintain mature trees in a vigorous growing condition. A vigorously growing tree is more winter hardy and less susceptible to many diseases and insect pests than is a less vigorous tree. Canker-causing fungi occur more commonly in weakened trees.Also,many of the non-infectious tree diseases develop when soil nutrient,oxygen and moisture conditions are unfavorable.Healthy,vigorous trees tend to resist borers,while those growing under unfavorable moisture or nutrient conditions are more susceptible to attack by these insects. Established trees weakened by leaf diseases, insect defoliation, mechanical injury, soil compaction, drought, or other causes often show reduced twig and trunk growth or dying of branch ends.Fertilizing may stimulate additional growth so that the plant can compensate for the adverse conditions that caused decline. I. To Prevent Plant Injury—Avoid use of lawn fertilizer/herbicide combinations where the roots of desirable and sensitive vegetation could pick up herbicide.Herbicides for use around trees should be applied separately at the rates suggested on the label. II. Fertilizing Sensitive Plants— a) When fertilizing American Beech and broadleaf evergreens,reduce applications of inorganic fertilizers to one-half the label-recommended rates of fertilizer, or use slow-release materials instead. b) Be aware that over-fertilizing small trees such as flowering crabapples can result in excessive succulent growth. Succulent growth is more prone to fireblight symptoms on susceptible plants such as pear, Jonathan apple and mountain ash. C-4 III. Fertilize in Moist Soils — Fertilizer should always be applied to moist soils to enhance fertilizer uptake, reduce fertilizer injury to plants,and aid in soil injection or drill hole treatments. If soils are not moist,irrigation should precede fertilization to moisten the plant root zone area. The liquid injection method of fertilizing trees and shrubs will help moisten the soil in the root zone while applying desired nutrients. The benefits of water in dry soil will reduce nutrient as well as moisture stress. IV. Fertilizing Excessively Wet Soils—Avoid fertilizing trees growing in soil that is excessively wet. The roots in wet soil are often damaged from lack of oxygen caused by the accumulation of toxic gases. Adding fertilizer in any form may contribute to root injury. V. Read the Label—Read the entire label of any fertilizer product before application,and apply per label recommendations. EXAMPLE Slow release fertilizer is measured by the percentage of water insoluble nitrogen,(WIN).Use the following formula to determine the percentage of water insoluble nitrogen in a bag of fertilizer: of WIN x 100 - %of N that is slow release 0/0 of total N Example for a fertilizer label that reads 32-7-7: Guaranteed Analysis Total Nitrogen (N)....32% Water Insoluble Nitrogen....12.5% Nitrate Nitrogen....2.0% Water Soluble Nitrogen....17.5°/o Available Phosphoric Acid....7% Soluble Potash....7% 12.5%of WIN x 100 lbs. of fertilizer - 390/o 32%of total N 39%of the available N is slow release SELECTED REFERENCES KUHNS, LARRY J. 1985. Fertilizing Woody Ornamentals. Cooperative Extension Service, The Penn State University. NEELY, DAN. 1980. Tree Fertilizing Trials. Illinois Journal of Arboriculture: 6(10). NEELY, DAN and E. B. Himelick. 1971. Fertilizing and Watering Trees. Illinois Natural History Survey Circular#52. RATHJENS,RICHARD and Roger Funk. 1984.Guide to Turf, Trees and Ornamental Fertilization.Weeds,Trees&Turf Magazine (October). SMITH, ELTON M. 1978. Fertilizing Trees and Shrubs in the Landscape. Journal of Arboriculture: 4(7). This Standard was revised in 1987 with the assistance of. Dr. Elton M. Smith, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH C-5 I CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: -16- q(, STAFF: Iva D4AJ /'E -1 APPLICANT: A G ENT: -/4/27if Phone: ( I Phone: ( 1 .57( - S390 PROPERTY LOCATION: G ADDRESS: /C� S 60 �� O 7 TAX MAPITAX LOT: //'-5/ 3 4-.4- 7 c50 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): 517 DE-r/FLGPMz i 7 REV)Eu.) /41/1/a- , ,7t?io.t- PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 6,4/601 29,, j eA IA)/ 5,/0' p14-1/ COMPREHENSIVE // PLAN DESIGNATION: c ZONING DESIGNATION: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACILITATOR: TEAM AREA: PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: / % q. ft. Average lot width: 60 ft. Maximum building height: L15 ft. Setbacks: front -- ft. side _✓ ft. rear ft. corner -� ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: vO % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: l5 % (Refer to Code Section 18. ) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON•Residential appiicationiPlanning Department Section ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUI ENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 et unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. • Lots created as part o a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wi access easement. The depth of all I s shall not exceed 2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the mi imum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots) SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ Streets: feet from the centerline of /-/1 // • ➢ Established areas: feet from ➢ Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ Flag lot: 10 foot side yard setback. (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1 .5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least '/2 (half) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zone district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) __PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: 5 �= .aC ES pi /?Et: e sSio,p,pat Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. —� Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) �. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON•Residential applicationiPlanning Department Section Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks ------>7 shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle • parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: i Minimum access width: - -=? Minimum pavement width: L il -_� All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: NA . (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS T Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial b . ing in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space siz nd location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section .106.070-090) CLEAR VISION AREA !'7 The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) BUFFERING AND SCREENING ..,./1' In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential applicationiPlanning Department Section The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. ft. along east boundary. ICI ft. along south boundary. /0 / ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along Ti I 4/ EC:.IC l.ic & LANDSCAPING >---7 Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1 ) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) ,/,,A/l SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. 4-60161,0,VI. 1 . (Refer to Code Section 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are pote■ 'ally unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainage • .ys, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attem. o preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available ' formation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their •oundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive I. ds must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential applicationiPlanning Department Section Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the , protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited ' hin floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100- - year floodplain areas to the City for par nd open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: b Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; * Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: > Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; > Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches nJ caliper requires 18.150.070.D; > Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; > Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; * Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and b A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential application/Planning Department Section MITIGATION • Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) NAf�RATIVE ✓� The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.92 _18.100 r 18.108 = 18.120 ..-18.15O v 18.84 f 18.96 — 18.102 _ 18.114 14 _ 18.130 _ 18.160 18.88 18.98 i 18.106 _- 18.116 _ 18.134 _ 18.162 18.164 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre•Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON Residential applicatioruPlanning Department Section 1 RECYCLING Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: '1 , / ■ - /�' • O. 0 j ' � , . MG F/ -• .i - i b0 f r) SG lOA/ A6 rr✓uIN - 7i/t-- 5.ei 4-DJ-o rn veT fkopary ��P 1 6—AJ. ielez6.55 -T/1e 5T/ To ke-sr l.S WES t2:0 4#1- L. Se) l-F, 77,4,e.t Iliv6. Z / Pa L.4 /✓ 0 . '7. ' . . L 0 v- ," 7 WI-1,4w -IC-G.0?LA ti / W// )Eo u Mee- S&.N3/12 vim' LA.&' s Rvwew. a 5/Li/API) b/ ►vE 7 A« BCE. 7f',-y oOJ ,&e £,I,S,E.AiT .? A/D ,f4 ee EMF T S0 1Am" USE t 46-.�4-.,A . '" F 2 5t�.4.eFO 2)2r ve. ge , / / ,_.L.A.,244, budd.(, ,, - I / ,,,:„....._ , , ddtv,,ctiuLe ., I ,14.ti Ai,: ota- I:a/ztpaA,Att po-o2-4-4- . J. - / 4 1 , 4/ / / 1 jelf.,9-- cortk 4 , -i, PROCEDURE L. Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential applicationlPlanning Department Section Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard +��� � �G atu`t) /C&, . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) is!are required if an application(s) is/are to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: GI, CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 halogm\patty imasters,preapp-c.mst (Engineering Section: masters\preapp-c.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential application;P!annmg Department Section ( 5( --2-5AA z•.. DA(( cgtt, A PUBLIC FACILITIES „4,.,4 CITY OF T1GAR The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: OREGON (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decis: making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision make authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportun to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requiremes that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (1.) 4U...- to feet from centerline. 12bv4 . 9 of Tat"— (2.) to feet from centerline. (3.) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: 1 (1.) (Z- street improvements will be necessary along 5N v1114 . (2.) street improvements will be necessary along (3.) Street improvements shall include '(O feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of cur and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determineL appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wide: on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights and a two year streetlighting fee. W t■r) PC-C 4 (P6t- I e •to&.«oo (s)) tAkicl t,cce.s5 ei iv -% 7. p,.._ %w'. ,/ •.-1, r / 'qi.111 II . V 'I• !_ . • -' '" ''''• • • le coI4R>( 14.47kA tit4•! cxxrT f_efsA.mWEU1 s o-( &-vp. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference 'totes Page 1 of 3 3esidennal ::p uanervEnareer.ng L'aoarrrent :encn �--- T is t� 5-(•104 o k4/ - . (1+= N-AI'!''VPRV D R(j k) In some cases, where stre• provements or other necessary public im ements are not currently practical, the str, . - improvements may be deferrE_ ,n such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the proper owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formati of a local improvement district formed to improve: . (1.) 4—Au„ D . (2.) . Pedestrianwaysibikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in 63/ AVE.. . The proposed development must be connected to a sanit ry sewer. It , the developer's responsibility to extend the ewer along the proposed development site's SAL et . 434- 4' -6 Ft&.t - sS iF m T PEA'{. Water Supply: The'c:#t.• O -( Water District • Phone:(503) provides public water service in thi area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposer development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchiil, (503) 526-2502) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: -axr : p S po..p Uk of x•St (` Mt'res 00 it 434c goR slt `s--STEM AP4L#48 -t.. Storm sewer improvements: .A 1:441144e Ft E vex5) v $AS44 ANAi 5+s A c - �-Ro' ' Wot.�— T st A4 cF ZF4h Srft. . STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce. Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quaiity facility and/or the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,540 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $2464+0. The City of Tigard shall determine a fee may be paid or a facility shall be Its.)•0O constructed. ca,6112APT I tuc: - 0•11 MI6 14 Ve T "THE. RLC 'tic-RG*1% I1 wAR:94 o15 I CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference .Votes Page 2 of 3 Res:dennal acwinnoruc,gmeenng Jecartrnent :scam TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a countywide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collect fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applican shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fe category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF ma be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissibl only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street openin permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floc plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639.4171 h:!agimpatty'preaoo.m eng.secnon oreaap.enc January 11. cc CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3 3es,dennat .lcpucancn Entreer ng Jeoartment =anon CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A,,, APPLICATION CHECKLIST CRY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: l(-,'i/1):9 Date: Z /3 `l c, APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) at' B) Owner's signature/written authorization Q` o C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies I? E) Filing Fee $ 5CE SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 1 . Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) e' 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds e' 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (fl Areas having severely weak foundation soils 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" - caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources zr- 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 1 OF 5 B) Site Develoament l-...n Indicating: No. of Copies /`S- 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties PY (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site rrY (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area o" (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ (e) Outdoor common areas t� (f) Above ground utilities ❑ 3. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site rY (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ze" 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped p� 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ram 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 1 1 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies lF The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines of (b) Slope ratios e' (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) a' (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development d 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals Er- (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND LSE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 3 - D) Architectural Dray s Indicating: No. of Copies 13 • The site developmt plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies /E The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable e' 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 13' 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces [E' 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials [Y 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Mao Indicating: No. of Copies 18 1 . The owner of the subject parcel 2. The owner's authorized agent o- 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date tY 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries GY 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7. Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements rY 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width (b) A scaled cross-sec ion of the proposed street plus any reserve strip t2( 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND LSE APPLICATION J UST PACE 3 OF 3 - - I) Subdivision Prelimi v Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets o 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) o 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at -t feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership a (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application -, LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 4 OF 5 J) Solar Access Calculations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies o h:'dogin\patty\masters\I!id ist.mst May 23, 1995 LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 FEB 09 '96-13:41 KAUFMAN HOMES P.2 ialeStlitoomis Gary Kaufman Dean Kaufman Duane Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road • Slem. Oregon 97306 • Phone: (503;370-8360 • Fax. 503; 370-2731 February 2, 1996 Il. ©OAr - WILL. TO: City of Tigard PIS-M P Development Services Department FROM: Gary Kaufman • Kaufman Homes RE: Pre-Approval Conference . Please consider this memo a request for a pre-approval conference for a proposed daycare center at Hall Blvd and SW 87th Avenue. • Attached please find for your review the following documents: 1. (2) copies of site map '2 . List of issues to be discussed at pre-approval conference. Please contact me at the number listed above with date and time of conference. Thank you. C4z,oz FEB 09 '96 13:41 KAUFMAN HOMES P.3 • List of issues to be discussed at pre-approval conference for day care center proposed at SW 87th Avenue and Hall Blvd: 1. Sewer location. 2 . Storm sewer location and hookup. 3. Credits for traffic impact fees, water quantity/quality fee and sanitary sewer connection fee. There is a house on the property now. 4. Traffic impact fee cost. 5. Do we need fire sprinklers in the building? i 6. Can we do retention on site water quality facility to eliminate water quality fees? 7 . Do we need to curb and sidewalk 87th street? 8. Are we zoned properly for a day care facility? 9 . Can we share the private drive from Hall to 87th with the north property owners with an easement and maintenance agreement? 10. Electrical wiring needs to be conduit? • • ____.._._ ; -----t i I---i l_ L. L 1, L `/ b. m to p+.We.�F10LF. 3,,Ge' lD1 E.;�t.b.' I s L, u ccsf►C ESE 1v>�a1' lD c-/ die ? 4 s -la �I 10 / 1-� -/, I `=fir 1 i W ry N D; _..____ _ _ . C' /: l-- it is. lb IA- 16 I. * Z 'f I f i 3! c ! - 11 4 k ; W •WCIP Adz 0 Frorc .c, p4 j+ - .pt.Yi�vc An 'I a 6A400 c c . _ _U�_ _ 1 ' 0 d Cg♦1'4 I. 1 ,t, I . i 4 ti { i „Lc ." v. ,.......__..i o. , _ ea-c- I-1,4,-7' BMST111 FI(. /O 3 (0 0 Sw�8 7 64Dz 5 fgen &TY 4i55 441-e Lpr I. el.Oc-L 30. MEYZ6it *CM 1c-T , rev Lor teiPa - AK '/4, • S. -ri5,e i W D Wo..."4 i'ii i-asJ Avi.1 WY, Oft 17—. 1 L / . N N f�C.35•�1n -�-o� °� > z 190.E h 1 - i 19 0 0 ' 19 ._1 f � ., W CO fs o . o 3_64 2 Q . � 0 o� 0 • p2 , .. C.S. 10107 .� 1702,./....;\ 1700 i J M r r f 7 r F.,- CS. y }'173,0 • • 301 J : rf4.16' c -- — — — �. r:;o.a t is s' °D ' VAC,Tt�. Brio -,ar.. Ili' tAPLE LEAF STREET • 2000 �144_19t' SI 1 00 190.3 2200 1 99.3' • 1- 2202-0110/gtit •• c„, . _: t. ,..... , ._ _ . t_ ____ _..,_____ . ,is . P. �1JJ^^ _.J O 2201 • 0 ' ,0g70 2 - 39 1 In '� • 2500 I 1 2400 2300 95 „' m f e93) " / 23Q3 •.a7--4- 4 •�. o (� o 1. O g 2305 Zr, _ , 1r 0 7—1 9S,S0 T. A 9 r 2304 2302 - J 6 1ot_1I' a `e `J 1 +0.�' 6 79 t9 96.3 r b 03-3 346 R1 � � - OAK ..�_. STREET o TREET T .- z s o o l.4 aT OO 3 r.o.i 1041: ar 2801 2900. 3000 • 0 9^� rd i 2500 3 o .221k. r .1711 _ _- r 53: .. 190.i• • 60- 915 .. 3500 I 3300 1 • CHICAGO g 'This plat is for your aid in A locating your land with reference - - _ to streets am,other parcels 3 4 0 0 White this plat is believed to rk be correct,the company assumes • 0 no liability for any loss occurring ve by reason of reliance thereon.' ft MAP 6 a 9 e.re NAIL No 1 ( 3c � i •j.u' a+crtoq ma INSURANCE cot"P""► 1 3 3 Ao at i S.E. sur'ciYslo€aonla ° Di►1 C C3ACKAMAs.01V000 9)7996 • 8•d - S3WOH Nt3Wdflb>1 88:T T 96, 60 H33 IL ►- iTy _ _ O 0. st. ,,, a f, 190 '': / / � � is Wil - `.,� PAVED I____ C3 i 4 Q ill 21 i x N , -.7"7.------------/ 0/ )\ _ .,—,--I I I A' . i \ / I 1DM- Hcr IN +i -X ./ x X - 2—-X 1 179.8 1 X70 / / r----I 0 I , I 1 I -."---.'''''''''......7 /7 / I 1M J I L --'IIW,-__ IP Q,e, T. ://JL___ iii /80- IN_ __ me it v i . fig O \ 1 1` _ `� y 50(Y'k.4St f ,, ; X x 4f 1 ' / rip' 0 11 7 X /� �XJ 178.9 ' -0-- ,�I © I d, /c( - '-‘ .� 111 C. #110 ZX .4 4 ,// X v X . ( N I :y 117 Of X4/ , 1 1 f - //6 4 ., // VI • N--.... (11,) 'MP" ■ 0 V31 M X 169.6 1� I ' � o M H. 1 _�_ 1 I ` • M H.- . _ - l-N I.MVall ). / '� 1 I I 1 l} �1 i'll_ Ll ��i ♦" M �% 0/' ) ��_ - -�� OMH. 1773 X S.W. r OAK 0 MH. ST. ■ BR.c. 1 omen yam. 1 C. it8R. A f a I X 1 , 7 � (� X 4i. „....E:i, ,i 190 /•!� f f -- jig' © O '� 00 .. Q MH. . Jr i , . .: a 41F i__,_ A' / 1 X 163.8 0 we 4 ., x I X 162.5 \ D li .O IN H. (�- O MN. LM _ aTh. PIN E -- X \ p 1 j ��-- ■1 AD. �� 1 AIL AIM ♦ 6•.• II •• •• ■ • • 26 �� o ,,, • / • II • 25 7. • / • • • • • SW l) TAYLORS FERRY ROAD // f / • z ♦ / • (O7 ■ "...%..................•---.........f Q '[ • # i II 8 / • \I / ;11144114441114° 1004,0_4 0 4:1:0444. 4/ # r. 4'• • //* ■ � • • • • • • • f ■ • ■• SOUTHWEST CEDARCREST STREET • . . b • •/ 2 • • *******1.4s12' • ij - > Hq • x • / > 4 • liou„ • /• w • w• ■ �q ■ ■ LIMIT OF • =� `O `DETAILED LIMIT OF w ■ • ■ ■ ■ STUDY STUDY • O > • • •• • SW L;LMw000STREET ` CC ZONE A • o . • • • • • ■ ■ • • ZO E F3 w`• Culvert --------------- r — — — 2 • • • 1 180 1i► \ 181 ■ ZONE C cn t • • • • • • ■ • • • • • / >>9 ��- SOUTHWEST �� `■ • • /ZONE i 'HEMLOCK ■ • • • ■_. 11 ■ • • - - a • ■ • B STREET �J w X 11• 178 Z co • ■ • ZONE Al 'a SOUTHWEST "i1 CORAL r •• STREET • •• • • • • II •• • • ��, / SOUTHWEST LANDAU STREET //• SOUTHWEST • • (1 LOCUST • . STREET / Culvert • i• / 1177 �� ■• • • • :1 ■■ (: • •• • • • SOUTHWEST LOCUST STREET • • II II • w ` w I. • ■ ■ �I• ■IL_ • ■ ri ZONE B N V • • • 172 Q I 2 • • ■ 171 ,��� go • 52 •� • �� 53 CC 0 �• ■ ZONES / NI-I- n I i ZONE El • it- e1 SOUTHWEST OAK STREET (� • SOUTHWEST • • OAK • • • /. • STREET• •169 4 • • • I ♦ ■ • • • • x X U) STATE SW 95TH / F- HIGHWAY ••AVENUE •7 ZONE B • o M 217 r 161 SOUTHWEST PINE STREET 7 LI O. , m iisw— SW SPRUCE ■ / w STQr4- a ZONE B 11 z y,cy�� w I ` \ tom. s;. .� .. .�_ - r - ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS HOMES INC. Gary Kaufmar Dean Kaufman Duane Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE • Salem, Oregon 97306 • Phone: (503)370-8390 • Fax: (503)370-2731 To: City of Tigard From: Beth Thompson Kaufman Homes Re: Learning Tree Day Care Center 10360 SW 87th Ave. Tigard ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW. 5 sets of public improvement construction drawings. # 4 - Enclosed is a copy of the donation deed from the Oregon Dept. of Transportation, Highway division. The deed conveys a 5' strip of property along Hall Blvd. to the State of Oregon, increasing the right-of-way to a total of 45' from the centerline of Hall Blvd. #5 - Enclosed is a copy of the application and provisions from ODOT regarding connection to the strorm drain on Hall Blvd. #6 - Details and calculations for the on-site water quality facility are on page S2 of 9 of the plans. Additional calculations are on an attached sheet along with a description and maintenance plan for the area. #7 - Calculations for the volume of excavation to take place within the 100-year floodplain are located on page S2 of 9 of the plans, along with a statement as to the affect of the proposed excavation. Engineer: Mike Salituro (503) 581- 0975. #8 - 2 sets of revised site and landscape plans which includes the following additional information: A. Impervious surface/ landscaping calculations. B. Parking lot trees and landscaping to provide screening of the parking lot. C. Street trees along the entire length of Hall Blvd. and 87th Ave. D. Bicycle parking area. E. Compliance with vision clearance areas. F. Screening along south property by the use of a 5' tall sight obscuring fence. Buffering is achieved thru landscaping as per Section 18.100.080(D). G. Letter of compliance from Miller's sanitary service, Inc. H. A revised arborist report will be submitted by William Owens and Associates. #9 - Enclosed is a letter from Bill Parks at the Division of State Lands documenting that no permits are required. Also, application for the Army Corps of Engineers is enclosed. I have been in contact with Dan Gresham and he has indicated that he will send me documentation ASAP. CITY OF TIGARD • July 2, 1996 OREGON Gary Kaufman 37:7 _$3ctp 3622 Eldorado Loop S. 503' Salem, OR 97302 Re: Fill within the 100-year floodplain Dear Mr. Kaufman: Attached is a copy of Section 18.84.040 (Sensitive Lands Approval Criteria). This section lists the criteria that must be satisfied in order to allow fill within the 100-year floodplain. As outlined in the pre-application notes, fill within the floodplain will require a sensitive lands review. The proposal includes fill within the 100-year floodplain. The application submitted did not address the sensitive lands criteria. This application is tentatively scheduled for a decision on July 24th. Prior to the City issuing a decision, the attached criteria must be addressed. Adequate evidence must also be submitted that demonstrates that the proposed fill will comply with these criteria. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, jil.„(j."(e.„....4../)6144c,"„,c William D'Andrea Assistant Planner is\cu rp l n\w i l l\sd r96-14.113 c: SDR 96-0014 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 18.84.028 General Provisions for ordinance provisions on which the approval was Wetlands. based. A. Wetland regulations apply to those areas C. Notice of the decision shall be provided to meeting the definition of wetland in Chapter 18.26 the applicant. The Director's decision may be of the Community Development Code, areas appealed by the applicant as provided by meeting Division of State Lands wetland criteria Subsection 18.32.310.A. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89-06; and to land adjacent to and within 25 feet of a Ord. 87-66;Ord.87-32;Ord.83-52) wetland. Wetland locations may include but are not limited to those areas identified as wetlands in 18.84.040 A. •royal Stan. _•_ "Wetland Inventory and Assessment for the City of Tigard, Oregon," Scientific Resources A. The appropriate approval authority shall Incorporated, 1990. approve or approve with conditions an application request within the 100-year floodplain B. Precise boundaries may vary from those in Subsections 18.84.015 B. and E. based upon shown on wetland maps; specific delineation of findings that all of the following criteria have been wetland boundaries may be necessary. Wetland atisfied: delineation will be done by qualified professionals at the applicant's expense. (Ord.90-29) 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and 18.84.030 Expiration of Approval: maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall Standards for Extension of Time. not result in arty encroadtments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and - A. Approval of a sensitive lands permit shall be other development unless certified by a registered ( void if: professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during 1. Substantial construction of the approved the base flood discharge; plan has not begun within a one-and-one-hall year period;or 2. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed 2. Construction on the site is a departure only in areas designated as commercial or from the approved plan. industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments B. The Director shall, upon written request by associated with community recreation uses, the applicant and payment of the required fee, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in grant an extension of the approval period not to Chapter 18.42 of the Community Development exceed one year,provided that: Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; 1. No changes are made on the original plan as approved by the approval authority; 3. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the 2. The applicant can show intent of floodplain it will not result in any increase in the initiating construction of the site within the one water surface elevation of the 100-year flood; year extension period;and 4. The land form alteration or 3. There have been no changes to the development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the 18-84-7 Rev.01/24/95 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE . i. construction of said pathway is deemed by the shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic; Hearings Officer as untimely; and shallow depth to-bedrock;and 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle 4. Where atural vegetation has been pathway indicate that no pathway will be below removed due to land form alteration or the elevation of an average annual flood; development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious Surfaces will be replanted to 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, 18.100,Landscaping and Screening. Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained;and C. The appropriate approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions an 7. Where land form alterations and/or application request for a sensitive lands permit development are allowed within and adjacent to within drainagevlays in Subsections 18.84.015 B. the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the and D. based Upon findings that all of the dedication of sufficient open land area within and following criteria have been satisfied: adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the comprehensive plan. This area shall include 1. The extent and nature of the proposed portions of a suitable elevation for the land form alteration or development will not construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway create site disturbances to the extent greater than within the floodplain in accordance with the that required for tlIe use; adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. 1 2 The proposed land form alteration or B. The appropriate approval authority shall development will not result in erosion, stream approve or approve with conditions an sedimentation, ground instability, or other application request for a nsitive lands permit on adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to slopes of 25 percent or greater or unstable ground life or property; in Subsections 18.84.0151 B. and D. based upon findings that all of the fo owing criteria have been 3. The water flow capacity of the satisfied: drainageway is mat decreased; 1. The extent and nature of the proposed 4. Where atural vegetation has been land form alteration o development will not removed due t land form alteration or create site disturbances t an extent greater than development, the areas not covered by structures that required for the use; I or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion n accordance with Chapter 2. The proposed and form )Iteration or 18.100, Landscaping and Screening; development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a adverse on-site and off-s to effects or hazards to public facility of adequate size to accommodate life or property; maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. 3. The structures are appropriately sited 1 and designed to ensure structural stability and 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of proper drainage of four ation and crawl space Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, areas for development with any of the following Division of State Lands approvals shall be soil conditions: wet/high water table; high obtained. 18-84-8 Rev.01/24/95 1 HOMES/NC. Gary Kaufman Dean Kaufman Duane Kaufman 1295 Baxter Road SE • Salem, Oregon 97306 • Phone: (503)370-8390 • Fax: (503)370-2731 August 13, 1996 Mr. William D'Andrea 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR Dear Mr. D'Andrea: I have three sets of revised plans dated 8-13-96 for drainage and gradiing,that hopefully you will review and approve. In the event that the above mentioned plans will not work for you I have two sets of the revised plans that you previously reviewed. The new plans have the engineer calculations on them for the amount of fill removed and replaced in the flood plain are.a which is no net fill. I have also included three sets of plans provided by the arborist Owens and Associates. They had called me and left a message that I should forward these plans on to you. I will be in my office during the next few days, please call me if you have questions. I appreciate your review of these plans for the Tigard Learning Tree Day School project. Sinc - , 0 -4 4r -44111 Gary K.ufman Kaufman Home nc. ) SEP-11-1997 11:30 P.01 WILLIAM L. OWEN & ASSOCIATES TREE& LANDSCAPE CONSULTANTS FAX TRANSMISSION FORM DATE: di ; \ 1 FROM: U11-a-�' d TO: 1Ko0 COMPANY: C t ico Tie. ' aP /41Q FAX #: b l/ r 11gY TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES SENT 3- (INCLUDING THIS SHEET) If you do not receive number of page Indic t Tease call our office at (503)222-7007 SENT BY: _-._., tiLt t47 Follow up copy sent by: TIME: 11 103 5 kr) ___.. Courier None William L. Owen & Associates, P.O. Box 641, Portland, OR 97207 Telephone Number 503-222-7007 FAX Number 503-656-3219 . SEP-11-1997 11:30 P.02 WILLIAM L. OV1, ..■I & ASSOCIATES TREE AND LANDSCAPE CONSULTING SERVICES P.O- Box 641, Portland. Oregon 97207 (503) 222-7007/656-7057 FAX(503) 656-3219 TRANSMITTALFIELD MEMO TO: C--1-1-‘1 Q UC 1 0 A rcD \O HA- 1) 'A- D MCP cite --k'c Q-cy--/ /-1--A GL From: 1,3 LO Date. Cr ) 1 ( l' i Project#:L ►)W`-fR t_ pity C,lz 7/4-Ad-L5L.tip Our job#: eirb3 Subject. ISAIL NO t r1 r,ATV I.J--- r.�` a)e 4rP!P IIAL Zfir lg7 PFP,41--'Di 'oC pc-A.A.) C_tC e4z-wb lT4 -- lD 0 P— to tc, Vex.,2 0E-IFI .) Um O{ •,) 't7LPt 4 I �y� 0114.E CM,L TF�1? 0.-►I r_tnc._ 1 33q 2. c:_. I s' . 1,r 642 Bvx_ _ 1ZY'cex DuND ii 3 bt d rt rx1c o I 1-'ri`r wig. Efo Ls -/3 = 349' k V3 =. 1-4' s Li, C ft g4+ii- I7A ax.. F6 2 P1 � 11 c.AL I PfJZ A c v c.v -P _ __ S 1 1-6-T-n_ C-AI-I.Yg,t 1, >t-+FEg ot L1' Rfl `P -E`1 T / L 8 f [ct .3 ÷ cfi &Itt-irvc -nz-rtec rre.-k i: ‘,.: • I t .;)z 3-3 /, -3,1 , b " giti-l*h_ rA___14 -_t_40,-7 ticsts-itzl t G A Imo, __ i<P9 FR Ar ki V t'4 1 li-- 0-- ...L-_.. ---'JAE' t 0 '.-- 11 ; " 191 , 1, a / L ■ ti p . k MI © : • f ro - 'AA AC3‘,9t.8t�4 _61,, g 5>ft A- Cg_ 6ti 4.-C4•t-T-100) , p ax L-7-1r Wit 14 NN,e, 1 F you /4 AV/ a ut -Dep --f----44-Aso Li__ \Lv 0 — Copy to: '.. r- SEP-11-1997 11:31 P.03 OeSaniis Tree Ca. 6518 Devon Rd. S.E. Salem, Oregon 97305 (503)362.5006 W.H. Eensink (503)37R-+694 Owner July 31 , 1997 TO; Kaufman Homes Quotation for planting 6" caliper fir trees at Learning Tree Tray Care Center for Kaufman Homes at Hall Blvd. & 87th Street site in Tigard, Oregon, Quantity; 20-25 trees @ Z?8g,00 each. Than k.You C424,4-4j-) Sill Bensink, Owner TOTAL P.03