Loading...
SDR1996-00018 SDR96 - 00018 ROGERS MACHINERY NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 2i. 4'�� CITY OF TIOARD ROGERS MACHINERY SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: ROGERS MACHINERY Site Development Review SDR 96-0018 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested to develop a 30,025 square foot light industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse. APPLICANT: David Hickman Architects OWNER: Rogers Machinery 700 N. Hayden Island Drive 14600 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, OR 97217 Tigard, OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). LOCATION: The site is located at the south east corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lot 00501. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: • (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement are required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements.) Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the construction documents and financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee, and a sign installation and or streetlight fee is required. 4. The applicant shall provide the recommended measures, as listed in the letter from Kittelson & Associates, dated June 17, 1996, to enable the proposed access onto Bonita Road to function properly. Specifically: A. The driveway shall have a 50-foot turning radius, a 30-foot curb radius, and have minimum width of 40 feet. B. The driveway shall be located at least 200 feet west of SW Sequoia Parkway. If this spacing is not provided, the driveway will need to be limited to right/in, right/out for all traffic. C. The applicant shall install signs at the driveway to alert truck traffic that left turns are prohibited at this driveway. D. The applicant shall re-stripe the existing left turn lane in Bonita Road to provide for two-way left turns. The applicant shall submit a striping plan prepared and/or approved by Kittelson & Associates. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 2 E. The final plans for the driveway location and design shall be approved by Kittelson & Associates. Proof of their approval shall be submitted to the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way (ROW) at the corner of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius. • The ROW dedication shall be parallel with the curb return and provide enough space for the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp. 6. The public improvement plans shall include the reconstruction of the curb return at the southwest corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius. The reconstruction shall also include the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp and any other modifications to existing utilities or drainage structures. 7. The public improvement plans shall include the construction of a new sidewalk along the frontage of SW Bonita Road. The width of the sidewalk shall be 6 feet. 8. Any connection to public water lines shall be shown on the proposed public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department. 9. The applicant shall submit a copy of the issued Corps of Engineers permit for the filling of the on-site swale area. 10. The applicant shall submit calculations pertaining to the filling of the swale. Specifically, the applicant shall show how and where the storm water that presently flows into the swale will be collected and carried through the site. Staff will need to be assured that the on-site storm system will be adequately sized to handle that water. 11. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 12. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the site improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 13. The property owner shall either consolidate the legal parcels into one parcel or enter into a joint access and maintenance agreement. 14. Additional walkways shall be designed from the entrance of the warehouse building to SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. A designated walkway shall be provided between the two new buildings. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 3 15. A minimum of one additional handicapped parking space is required to be provided if the warehouse is developed. A minimum of one of the handicapped parking spaces is required to be van accessible. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 16. The applicant shall provide a screening plan for roof top or other mechanical equipment, where necessary, based on final design plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 17. Floor plans and building elevations for the proposed warehouse shall be reviewed for compliance with the development standards of the Community Development Code in terms of setbacks, off-street parking, building height, off-street loading, etc. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. A minimum of one bicycle rack shall be relocated to the entrance of the proposed warehouse building. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 19. The applicant shall revise the plan so that the site obscuring fencing is not located within the Clear Vision Area at the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. 20. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement 1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: A. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and B. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. 2. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 4 SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES 1. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: A. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to • ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and B. Approve and release such bonds. 2. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site has been designated for Light Industrial use since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. No previous development applications have been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north the site is adjoined by other properties developed for industrial use. To the west the site is adjoined by other existing industrial uses. To the east the property is adjoined by a restaurant. To the south the property is adjoined by the current Rogers Machinery site. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently undeveloped. Several existing trees are scattered throughout the site. The applicant proposes to develop an industrial building, a warehouse building and related site improvements. An open drainage swale that contains wetlands also bisects the property. Because this wetland is not identified as a "Significant Wetlands" as reviewed in the wetlands' inventories contained within the Comprehensive Plan, no City review of a Sensitive Lands NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 5 application is required to fill this area. The Division of State Lands states that no fill permit is required to fill the wetland area within the drainage swale. The applicant has also contacted the Army Corps of Engineers and is attempting to obtain a fill permit. A copy of the required fill permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of development permits. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to utilize the proposed buildings for light manufacturing uses and warehouse uses. These uses are classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Manufacture of Finished Products, Light Wholesale Storage and Distribution. Section 18.70 lists both use types as permitted in the Light Industrial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.70 states that there is no minimum lot width requirement in the Light Industrial Zoning District. Developments within the Light Industrial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has complied with this standard by proposing to landscape over 15% of the site. Setbacks: Section 18.70 states that a front yard setback of 30 feet shall be provided. Section 18.98 also states that no structures shall be developed within 30 feet of the centerline of SW Bonita Road or SW 72nd Avenue. No other setback standards apply other than Clear Vision and Landscape Screening that are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Light Industrial Zoning District also limits building height to a maximum building height of 45 feet. The applicant has provided a setback of 30 feet from centerline of SW Bonita Road and SW 72nd Avenue, in compliance with this requirement. The maximum height of the habitable portion of the proposed structure is 35 feet and is also in compliance with the development standards of this zoning district. Non-habitable portions of the structure are proposed to be at up to 45 feet. The Development Code does not specify a minimum height requirement for non-habitable architectural features. The applicant has not indicated the proposed height and setbacks for the warehouse structure. The warehouse building shall be reviewed and approved for compliance with setbacks, height, and other applicable standards prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these sections is reviewed elsewhere within this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These requirements are found to be inapplicable as approval standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 6 Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The applicant has addressed this requirement through an arborist report for the site. The preservation and/or replacement requirements are addressed elsewhere within this staff report. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has addressed this requirement by proposing to develop landscaping along the street frontages that adjoin this site. The applicant has also proposed to locate the warehouse building towards the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway to further screen loading and service uses from the street. No roof top or other mechanical equipment is shown on the preliminary plan. The applicant shall provide a screening plan for roof top or other mechanical equipment, where necessary, based on final design plans. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department has reviewed this plan and found these issues to have been sufficiently addressed as proposed. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has proposed to plant 19 Norway Maples at 30 feet on center. Due to their size at maturity, these trees satisfy the street tree requirements for this site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 7 Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed building to be developed along the SW Sequoia Parkway frontage effectively screens all of the proposed parking lot areas from view. The applicant has proposed to develop additional landscaping along the SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road frontages. The proposed landscaping and site obscuring fencing appear to screen the parking lot from adjoining streets to the extent possible. The landscaping as proposed addresses the aforementioned functional issues except for the parking lot trees. Because a total of 112 parking spaces are proposed, a minimum of 16 parking lot trees are required to be provided. A total of 26 parking lot trees are proposed, in compliance with this requirement. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. No obstructions may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area at a street intersection is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance from the intersection of street right-of-way lines and then connecting these two, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The Visual Clearance Area at a driveway intersection in excess of 24-feet in width is measured from the corner of the driveway and street intersection for a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and 30-feet back from the driveway and street intersection and then connecting these two, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. With one exception, the plan as proposed does not put vision obscuring structures or plantings within the intersections on SW Bonita Road, SW 72nd Avenue, and SW Sequoia Parkway. The applicant shall revise the plan so that the site obscuring fencing is not located within the Clear Vision Area at the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.Minimum Off Street Parking Requirements states that a minimum of one parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area be provided for office space, a minimum of one parking space for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of warehouse, a minimum of one space for each employee on the largest shift and a minimum of one parking space shall be provided for 1,000 square feet of warehouse area shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to relocate parking spaces where the new construction will eliminate 44 existing parking spaces. The applicant also proposes to provide 20 spaces for the 6,795 square feet of new office space. A total of 26 employees are to be at the site during the largest possible NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 8 shift. The applicant has also proposed to provide 12 parking spaces for the future warehouse. The total number of parking spaces that are required to serve the proposed and existing building square footage is 102 spaces. A total of 112 parking spaces are proposed, therefore, the application is in compliance with the minimum requirements. The applicant has proposed to stripe approximately 38% of the required 102 parking spaces as compact spaces. This is not in excess of the 40% maximum allowed compact spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires a minimum of five disabled parking spaces if 101 to 150 parking spaces are provided. A minimum of one of these spaces is also required to be designed to be van accessible. The proposed site plan provides four handicapped parking spaces. A minimum of one additional space is required to be provided at buildout of the site. It is recommended that this space be provided near the main building entrance of the proposed warehouse. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Because the site is required to provide a minimum of 102 parking spaces, a minimum of seven bicycle parking spaces are required. A total of four bicycle racks, providing a minimum of eight parking spaces have been provided in compliance with this requirement. It is recommended that one of these racks be relocated to the entrance of the proposed warehouse building. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. Two loading areas have been provided, in compliance with this requirement. No floor plan or building elevations have been provided for the future 12,000 square foot warehouse. Floor plans and building elevations shall be reviewed for compliance with the development standards of the Community Development Code prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial use that requires more than 100 parking spaces provide two (2) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The applicant has proposed to develop one new driveway and to utilize two existing driveways, in compliance with this standard. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials is used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 9 feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The applicant has proposed a separated walkway system from the main building entrance of the new manufacturing building to SW 72nd Avenue. Because SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway also provide access to the site, additional walkways shall be designed from the entrance of the warehouse building to SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. A walkway between the two new buildings is also required. The proposed manufacturing building shall also provide a walkway system to SW Bonita Road. Parking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110(B) states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The applicant has proposed to connect with the parking lot on the adjoining industrial site. The property owner shall either consolidate the legal parcels into one parcel or enter into a joint access and maintenance agreement. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant states that none of the existing trees are in excess of 12 inches in diameter. Upon review of the site, none of the existing trees appear to exceed 12 inches in diameter. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. The applicant has not requested signage for this property at this time. The applicant may apply for signage at a later date. Any such application will be reviewed for compliance with signage restriction for properties within this zoning district. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 10 PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Section's 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), 18.164.100 (Storm Drains), Water, Grading and Erosion Control shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site is adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road. SW 72nd Avenue is classified as a Major Collector street and is fully improved adjacent to this site. This site has an existing driveway onto the roadway near the middle of the site frontage. No additional right-of-way (ROW) dedications or street improvements are warranted. SW Bonita Road is also classified as a major collector street and is mostly improved except for a concrete sidewalk along the frontage and a substandard curb return at the Sequoia Parkway intersection (this will be discussed later). The applicant's plan indicates that they will construct the sidewalk adjacent to Bonita Road as a part of this project. The applicant is proposing to build a new driveway onto Bonita Road from the site. Staff had concerns with this proposal from the standpoint of impacts to the adjacent intersections of Bonita/72nd and Bonita/Sequoia Parkway. Staff is most concerned with the Bonita/72nd Avenue intersection and any impacts the driveway may have on the signal operation. The applicant submitted a report from Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated June 17, 1996 (letter signed by David Clark). A copy of this report was also provided in the applicant's materials for this site development review. Based on the traffic engineer's findings, the proposed site access should function properly without adversely impacting the local intersections. However, since truck turning movements may result in conflicts with other travel lanes in Bonita Road, it is recommended that left turns be restricted for trucks. Kittelson recommends that the applicant place signs within the site and at the access to alert truck drivers that left turns are not permitted at that driveway. Passenger car traffic could be allowed to make left turns at the driveway if it is located at least 200 feet west of the Sequoia Parkway intersection. The reason for this is to allow existing left-turning traffic to continue to turn into the industrial development north of Bonita Road without encountering conflicting left turning traffic into this site. Kittelson recommends that the current left turn lane on Bonita be re-striped to allow two-way left turns along approximately 300 feet of the site frontage. Kittelson stated that if the driveway is not located at least 200 feet from Sequoia Parkway, the driveway should be constructed as a right-in/right-out for all traffic. Staff concurs with the traffic engineer's findings but notes that the applicant's plan appears to not conform to the traffic engineer's recommendations. For instance, the driveway appears to only be 175 feet west of Sequoia Parkway, not 200 feet as recommended. The plans show "No Left Turn" signs to be placed at the entrance, but in Staffs experience, signs alone will not provide for the proper left-turn restrictions. In many cases where a "no left turn" driveway is installed, developers attempt to construct islands that Staff refers to as "pork chops". These islands are constructed to channel traffic out of the site in a right-turning movement and prevent cars from entering in a left-turning movement. However, there are many cases in the City, and other Cities, where these pork chop NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 11 islands do not work well in preventing passenger cars from making left turns. They do work well, however, in preventing large trucks from making the left turns. Staff recommends the applicant be required to implement the recommendations of Kittelson & Associates and, prior to issuance of the building permit, provide the City with a driveway location and design that is approved by Kittelson. SW Sequoia Parkway is classified as a local commercial & industrial street. The City improved this roadway several years ago through an LID, but was unable to provide a standard curb return at the southwest corner of the intersection with Bonita Road (the City was unable to acquire ROW from the subject site). Therefore, a substandard curb return was installed as a temporary measure with the intention that when the subject site develops, the curb return would need to be re-built. The temporary curb return only provides a 25-foot curb radius instead of a 40-foot radius required by City design standards. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to reconstruct the curb return at this intersection as a part of this project in order to provide a safe and functional 40-foot curb return. In order to install the new curb return, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW at the corner. The ROW dedication will need to be parallel with the curb radius and provide enough space for the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp to be included. This dedication shall be completed prior to issuance of the building permit. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 21-inch public sewer line in SW Bonita Road and an existing 10-inch sewer line in SW Sequoia Parkway, both of which are able to serve this site. The plans are unclear as to where the sewer service for the buildings will be directed. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm drainage from this site will be directed to the north end of the site where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility. From there, the storm water will be discharged into an existing 96-inch public storm line that presently crosses this site. The plans also call for the filling of an existing drainage swale on the site that picks up storm water from the southeast corner and conveys it to the north property line where it presently discharges into a 24-inch pipe at Bonita Road. The applicant has applied for a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to allow this filling. The applicant received notice from the Division of State Lands (DSL) that the swale does not fall under the category of a "wetland" and, therefore, a DSL permit is not required. The applicant's intention is that the swale will be filled and any storm water that presently flows into it will be picked up by existing on-site pipes. However, the plans do not indicate how or where this existing storm water will be collected. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide detailed plans and calculations for the modifications to the on-site storm system to make sure it is sized large enough to account for the loss of the drainage swale. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 12 STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant is proposing to install a biofiltration swale on the site to treat the new impervious areas. Staff did not receive preliminary sizing calculations with the application material, so was unable to determine if the swale area will be large enough to serve the project. From the plan view, it appears the facility will be adequate. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity that accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. WATER: This site will be served from the City's water system. There are existing public lines in Bonita Road and 72nd Avenue. The site is currently served from the City's system. The applicant's plans are unclear as to how the new buildings will be served. It is likely that they will be served from extensions of the on-site system. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police, Water, and Building Departments have reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and stated that the application as proposed is not approved. Plan details concerning the following issues shall be submitted to the Fire Marshall's Office: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 13 Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) except for crowning for water run-off. . Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2). The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec 903.4.2.4). A Fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5). FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief. (1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1). Fire department connections shall not be located on the building that is being protected. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5). The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3). Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704). A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's office for an application and instructions regarding installation and placement. No other comments or objections have been received. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 14 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: • X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. September 12, 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner 1?4 l,T September 12, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard B ersdorff DATE Planning Manager I'\CURPLMPATTASDR96-18 DOC NOTICE OF DECISION SOR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 15 1' I I I 4-I s.w. soNsT.... Al0110 • I •• • •• ofir 111004+ IL..... .7.- — ` D10- LTRATTL7ML. ms - . ej►tom % �� 1-• ; � �1 \ Z 0 Iv _ ►+Er�.vw+a ,* !IV I i, J "MI M o. w CAM .. ... ... ... 'Al I ••-GATE • - •• L• ' FILL 5w,4LE MoIx,.s < W .-. `al�""K` .�. THIS PERMI "'r �(IIITORAcrie YAM? >1 a vet, Q .. !t. < es—. •• CD t .-_ a� Z d :... Boa 0 • :, 4c �� 7 � — �■ _� • e IIuet 1111 .. . SIaii ;Alm . ME _ 'c�vE�0 UAO t RAW!�Awa+a 0 / ■ aruarr exism een1.K.T �%1 1 1 1 I a``tea -_` cCT) .- / wG.T - i C/ 1 . n i i 1 _ i Ur • MA �1011Yf 1 i n I I'1 LL. 1 1 I .r o t I >- t I ;1 � l _ 1! UI I 1 I, l 1 I 1 SITE PLAN i CASE NO. , EXHIBEXHIBIT MAP , ( Rogers Machinery IT D MAP 1 SDR 96-0018 1 . I I I 3 " C H FSJTE,� 1* • * )1 .. \ — C 4 • V4 2 i In co ci BON TA Rp I L\ "\\ I ; CT 8 ■ 4!-- PAR F ELS c.3) C c� Q , l CL = 1 CARaNAI LN \ 0 L ---] i . (,0 7 y • / . � � i tt . • •■■■■■*LN L 4111 `T>1 IIIIIIIw qv i Ira:_._r 111 Q ICioBLE LN ' V ( J 1 ) '' WV Vicinity Map A SDR 96-0018 OM VP•b-o N Rogers Machinery Company REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 09/18/96 14:41 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL 0001.004 p *R *I *D*E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood. OR 97140 (503)625-6177 TELEPHONE: (503) 625-6177 FAX # (503) 625-6179 FAX COVEK SHEET DATE: TO: -f- TELEPHONE: FAX NUMBER: s ^' Z t_7 ATTENTION: tri FROM: WE ARE SENDING 41 PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) . IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL US AS SOON A POSSIBLE. THANK YOU! Priniisd on 100% recycled paper. 09/18/96 14:42 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL 1j002/004 09-48-96 03 : 14PM FROM ROGERS "'HINERr g2 TO 6255179 P001/003 Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. R (4)4-LT lUevA �� Q -..- (P Facsimile Transmittal ,m y- L -��- eh 4WV WGTION FAX NUMBER PHONE NLJ$BER CA-L �rj. 0 PORTLAND.OR (503) 639-1844 (503) 639-615T-1 Gif. ��5�, ❑ SEATTLE.WA (206) 763-1187 (206) 763-2530 o 0 EUREKA,CA (707) 442-1086 (707) 443-6388 ❑CENTRAUA.WA (360) 736-8630 (360) 736-9356 0 SPOKANE.WA (509) 922-0910 (509) 922-0556 ���EI�I L6N/v Y 1-11/A)62. _- ❑ NAMPA. ID , (208) 463-4100 (208)463-1500 CC: SUBJECT (Cc1.) j LD� . "110 Pte,; lac ri (&/TN ,4c.re-72,00A iz ,/ , -) paw ems/ Y, 11471-‘ /Me "7".'1‘ 4?-0(;)e)cr- iooe fr /t) .Apy? 7i iAJ?- iYf>re ,2 co,A 77vN. J/ . L /Afpf" 7701 S Wte- Cpc .¢To AjJP e- ckreo co,2 !' /SITi, Q1,op �Cne4f$ ,. ` +f•ee oict Reef/Peep /J.0 7 ,S�0.cF Lae. ,-rro PLcAfc A /,6'2.0-' 1:G c-.41 gin. ) s A A) b /nA-12-/� fae-- vF / /f�-r'i 7' • C/7y ,64/6/43 e "°'.00 J?. ;it.) o 'rg 'tog, CAI( /Py D F A-Ny b/c /4 u_i? ))4,...15*-- !4 mod, c 7-44,-- et.eg. /r coin,e erAegrvenr Co, ��r--, r ��e /t)6,/ u ASP AD/0 1'. IJK f r /6 r 6frew lf-A' /010,4-e 09/18/96 14:42 12503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL a1003/004 09-1E-96 03: 14PM FROM ROGERS 1,<HINERY g2 TO 6256179 PO03/003 SEP v? '96 1911 DAVID HIM ARCH. P.3/3 1. ri • I. -------r-- 1 4., 4 4 • I ..... e• t 4- • .I- •■ -•-• . - 1, 3 . ..,i:r 1 i 1 \''\ --4 _ ,..,„ At _Ix - :4.•... ..,•• .-.. .1.- i , .... -..... 1/4.1.1 .. .• . . • . , 1 21 '1. \ . .. .. -P-13 ...........w.„ • ri ii P'5 :-.'l olc . . . . P • _....../.1 \ ty ... . ... • 11 st,,,,n Lts •••■.,...., ..1...-•••,„ If*IP • 'IP .:„, .. 4%.* •..4. .2. 1 • 4 -4: . . 41/4 + + + ,.--.12,■!:l t. ' ,,... ___44,4 4 4.it. fir4 4 4,....„4.4 ... j ilw-4• (1 `'` To ■ L.P• f o• 4 4 4 • 4-4—+ I L44 g 1. a 4,+ + + + + • 41.4WtiAtI-.Lei+4'+ ' 6 1.- 4. • 4 • 4 • 4 4 4 • . • Z C Flx Orn A # • ++ +. I, . + . 4 • 4 • .)11'. 4 + ‘‘,...._ .__ _ .........--.... I. ° . 4 • Z k i. tr— ._..– . ...w• •• y - -........._.41 • + dillitl; 414"t r 4 4 I- • i A - . GP 114 :kl t t t.414 • !* 4 • ..,4 • „ni 11.3; 4, • -Nt .•.,‘ "I. _ 4P4• J. 4. , m4 p p .r + - 4. • 1 • • . # f • 1 • 4 A + -6 4 4 te.4. . • ir vitt + . a , •14 ,i.! ..• 4 4-0,......-1, r • + 4 • +4, )11 )rep 4 4 a. 4 a. a. .1. + 4 I• 4' .1. • 41 lb , 'i ...4,4.4 .4,y, . 4 4 4 4 iltti 43 •,:-*-7±7-i.2-; ' 1'. ir..-r p4 L'` cr, . I`‹ 1 4 4 4 4 y 4 4 4 4 4 . i4D ()4 '74 •PT 4T 4 Iiii 4 4 • 4.: I: 4 .;.• 4 4 L . I 4 -- ..„., . „ 7,„*„ -4- ,_. ,. i 1 1 + • 4 4 4 ir "ii•-IP- • * •.• , • : % ‘,•• •• ••••••••.- I iii _ _ __.____\ . 41 + 4 + • 4 4 4 r 4 + t + + • 4 + 4 ,..1 • • 1. or • • * + • 4 • 4 + + 4 4 •- + 1• • v 4. . + 4. 4 itd 111 4. 4......aw••••••••4---L- ----• ...— —•, ilD . • a a. a. 4. •I• 4 4 L L *I I • • fmn.... ••■■ . •••■••••• ••••■• • ., 4 ,44.4. • __•• • . - —• • ,■.• - ,•,,• • mime., •■•■ • ••••■•• ..•••••.• A I 6 eld IV Ite ID 461.60' . --................ _ . . --------- - --....) ...-------- - ----------. -----.— li EXIVIN:c CANTS C.uT 1 603 'E5 t3 ' O9-ll-ge cri :liti'm F003 442 "-')% t'31 t _ 13 %PS pe S Mk Co . ir 1— :S tP )\. 1,,,e‘-e--i2A--- i 'r-• (4-<-‘31 0 6-) 09/18/96 14:43 '8503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL tj 004/004 09-16-96 03: 14PM FROM ROGERS ukCHiNERY 112 TO 6256179 P002/003 SEP 's7 '96 19;11 DAVID H OCI'IAN ARCH. _ P.Zr3..., • I• - p T T • Y.. i 1�.•- 4. 4 4 le." 14 [ ' ' qYt.iz.,..1) . .4.,....,„...,....:c...... , ,, s ,,,,,; ,, . .,.. J=-----r--.- 4. .1. ... , ,1 I..I,. g i: ' @IN I_Ilif & 4 . •"• r ro, t 1 liV �, p `•: :.1' .: .,4 ..... \ + . El a + * ri 1 71 BaAf • -4 }s t + 10 • ( -4 a ++i - ‘J • T T _ * f ++ + + + .9� V V m i _ * + 4 do 4. i + a•r r� • + t 1 t r T . . + A I 4 „V• oirp .., --1). .7„.. ._____ 4 . _ sk. - + * ,��� , fie 4240 . �..I. '4.1.I.9v+ V+1 4 d i at. -E . • , , i lo 0• _.. 4,4 + • , r `i i + � ' M �y , • � f • + ♦ f f t I ♦ + ti f y + ♦ 4. i + 4 i i -*_ • -• • • -7,-.'-f",-+VT*"s' .41° - Po - ��T ..T - 1 + a 4 •h + t + + � a 4 4 r t4+ . r 4 4. • ; + ■ r ✓✓ ( Vu • + 4 + do • + 4 + 1 •-■ + i } a .F. 4 + • + 4 ; 1 ' 4 4 7 . • ♦ + + * r•i}�Mw • r I t r , ..,. till . 4} ,+ti — ..t .'hS, ' • I Old 13' 1b' W 46180' 1 T 1tCI11TW¢e CUB C11T I 1$03 2a% 4362 114-j7-.11h uV:i,4rM vIJu'.,• ri42 l ,? DiVag dO. 0:phi e.,'f h....e.d5 4 1-0Kg0rd-74 0--5 s•L-E,,.■ . P.--43,10044 114-11 August 21 ' 1996 RECEIVED PL4NN/NG James AUG 3 11998 ]'� r 1 14600 Rogers Afachj?re Tigard OR 97224 6*6) RE: State Ball Creek N°' 11877 DI vjs10 Dear F111 Project ST A rE LA of Air. sTaTE N H We have Ki rkmi re• 10NN cAVD Bo�Ra Please material received PHIL KIT�NABFR within d c Nc 1996. d Ya u r �cretaK�rscr jurisdiction The D9ard tditChPPliCatio .11X1 HILL is lvjs he 1e reate n f° State Treasuaon rer tithe U must also r activity,Lands does n I August source. 11 F�)378-3805 Please b f�orps of authorization, ere fore a st ,` (503)'3�8 685 Sincere/y, Contact mee �e9znnjnnq neo when required,e permit erelY, j f You have nstruct /o en al from v---,( �_`.'�,� any questions. Planning N �11jam Parks total ResoCe Coordinator .rf 4. g, c: Den U•S. ry corps of En gjneers b d Hic a Ass oc;1 y Jf rj€ d ates MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: September 4, 1996 TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 96-0018, Rogers Machinery Company Description: This application is for approval of a 30,025 square foot (sf), two-story industrial building and a 12,000 sf warehouse building to be located at 14600 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 500 and 501). Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road. SW 72nd Avenue is classified as a major collector street and is fully improved adjacent to this site. This site has an existing driveway onto the roadway near the middle of the site frontage. No additional right-of-way (ROW) dedications or street improvements are warranted. SW Bonita Road is also classified as a major collector street and is mostly improved with the exception of a concrete sidewalk along the frontage and a substandard curb return at the Sequoia Parkway intersection (this will be discussed later). The applicant's plan indicates that they will construct the sidewalk adjacent to Bonita Road as a part of this project. The applicant is proposing to build a new driveway onto Bonita Road from the site. Staff had concerns with this proposal from the standpoint of impacts to the adjacent intersections of Bonita/72nd and Bonita/Sequoia Parkway. Staff was most concerned with the Bonita/72nd Avenue intersection and any impacts the driveway may have on the signal operation. The applicant submitted a report from Kittelson & Associates, Inc, dated June 17, 1996 (letter signed by David Clark). A copy of this report was also provided in the applicant's materials for this site development review. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. PAGE 1 Based on the traffic engineer's findings, the proposed site access should function properly without adversely impacting the local intersections. However, since truck turning movements may result in conflicts with other travel lanes in Bonita Road, it is recommended that left turns be restricted for trucks. Kittelson recommends that the applicant place signs within the site and at the access to alert truck drivers that left turns are not permitted at that driveway. Passenger car traffic could be allowed to make left turns at the driveway if it is located at least 200 feet west of the Sequoia Parkway intersection. The reason for this is to allow existing left-turning traffic to continue to turn into the industrial development north of Bonita Road without encountering conflicting left turning traffic into this site. Kittelson recommends that the current left turn lane on Bonita be restriped to allow two-way left turns along approximately 300 feet of the site frontage. Kittelson stated that if the driveway is not located at least 200 feet from Sequoia Parkway, the driveway should be constructed as a right-in/right-out for all traffic. Staff concurs with the traffic engineer's findings but notes that the applicant's plan appears to not conform to the traffic engineer's recommendations. For instance, the driveway appears to only be 175 feet west of Sequoia Parkway, not 200 feet as recommended. The plans show "No Left Turn" signs to be placed at the entrance, but in Staff's experience, signs alone will not provide for the proper left-turn restrictions. In many cases where a "no left turn" driveway is installed, developers attempt to construct islands that Staff refers to as "pork chops". These islands are constructed to channel traffic out of the site in a right-turning movement and prevent cars from entering in a left-turning movement. However, there are many cases in the City, and other Cities, where these pork chop islands do not work well in preventing passenger cars from making left turns. They do work well, however, in preventing large trucks from making the left turns. Staff recommends the applicant be required to implement the recommendations of Kittelson & Associates and, prior to issuance of the building permit, provide the City with a driveway location and design that is approved by Kittelson. SW Sequoia Parkway is classified as a local commercial & industrial street. The City improved this roadway several years ago through an LID, but was unable to provide a standard curb return at the southwest corner of the intersection with Bonita Road (the City was unable to acquire ROW from the subject site). Therefore, a substandard curb return was installed as a temporary measure with the intention that when the subject site develops, the curb return would need to be re-built. The temporary curb return only provides a 25-foot curb radius instead of a 40-foot radius required by City design standards. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to reconstruct the curb return at this intersection as a part of ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. PAGE 2 this project in order to provide a safe and functional 40-foot curb return. In order to install the new curb return, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW at the corner. The ROW dedication will need to be parallel with the curb radius and provide enough space for the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp to be included. This dedication shall be completed prior to issuance of the building permit. 2. Water: This site will be served from the City's water system. There are existing public lines in Bonita Road and 72nd Avenue. The site is currently served from the City's system. The applicant's plans are unclear as to how the new buildings will be served. It is likely that they will be served from extensions of the on-site system. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 21-inch public sewer line in SW Bonita Road and an existing 10-inch sewer line in SW Sequoia Parkway, both of which are able to serve this site. The plans are unclear as to where the sewer service for the buildings will be directed. 4. Storm Drainage: Storm drainage from this site will be directed to the north end of the site where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility. From there, the storm water will be discharged into an existing 96-inch public storm line that presently crosses this site. The plans also call for the filling of an existing drainage swale on the site that picks up storm water from the southeast corner and conveys it to the north property line where it presently discharges into a 24-inch pipe at Bonita Road. The applicant has applied for a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to allow this filling. The applicant received notice from the Division of State Lands (DSL) that the swale does not fall under the category of a "wetland" and, therefore, a DSL permit is not required. The applicant's intention is that the swale will be filled and any storm water that presently flows into it will be picked up by existing on-site pipes. However, the plans do not indicate how or where this existing storm water will be collected. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide detailed plans and calculations for the modifications to the on-site storm system to make sure it is sized large enough to account for the loss of the drainage swale. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. PAGE 3 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant is proposing to install a biofiltration swale on the site to treat the new impervious areas. Staff did not receive preliminary sizing calculations with the application material, so was unable to determine if the swale area will be large enough to serve the project. From the plan view, it appears the facility will be adequate. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91- 47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. PAGE 4 plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the construction documents and financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee are required. 4. The applicant shall provide the recommended measures, as listed in the letter from Kittelson & Associates, dated June 17, 1996, to enable the proposed access onto Bonita Road to function properly. Specifically: a. The driveway shall have a 50-foot turning radius, a 30-foot curb radius and have minimum width of 40 feet. b. The driveway shall be located at least 200 feet west of SW Sequoia Parkway. If this spacing is not provided, the driveway will need to be limited to right/in, right/out for all traffic. c. The applicant shall install signs at the driveway to alert truck traffic that left turns are prohibited at this driveway. d. The applicant shall restripe the existing left turn lane in Bonita Road to provide for two-way left turns. The applicant shall submit a striping plan prepared and/or approved by Kittelson & Associates. e. The final plans for the driveway location and design shall be approved by Kittelson & Associates. Proof of their approval shall be submitted to the Engineering Department. 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional ROW at the corner of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. PAGE 5 Road to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius. The ROW dedication shall be parallel with the curb return and provide enough space for the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp. 6. The public improvement plans shall include the reconstruction of the curb return at the southwest corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius. The reconstruction shall also include the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp and any other modifications to existing utilities or drainage structures. 7. The public improvement plans shall include the construction of new sidewalk along the frontage of SW Bonita Road. The width of the sidewalk shall be 6 feet. 8. Any connection to public water lines shall be shown on the proposed public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department. 9. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit a copy of the issued Corps of Engineers permit for the filling of the on-site swale area. 10. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall submit calculations pertaining to the filling of the swale. Specifically, the applicant shall show how and where the storm water that presently flows into the swale will be collected and carried through the site. Staff will need to be assured that the on-site storm system will be adequately sized to handle that water. 11. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 12. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the site improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. PAGE 6 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement 1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: A. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and B. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. 2. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES 1. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: A. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and B. Approve and release such bonds. 2. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. PAGE 7 SECT l pN 18 X64 Section 18. 164. 180 T BEET AND V Tl Work sha Notice to Cl `l T y IMPROVEMENT discontinued f�t began until City Required STANDA r any reason,til;the City has RpS. shall not be resumed notified in until the City is not. if Work k is APPROVED. Greg Berry A ct� ien9lbrienrisdr96 0018 bar n9 City Engineer ENGI NEERt NG COMMENTS SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co PAGE • P11 N frA TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE C+ FIRE PREVENTION -%%/(0 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O. Box 4755 . Beaverton OR 97076 . U (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538 /FF8 RESG To: #h- I C a S 9 ES�•---^ Z. i/11 Date: l ❑ WC ❑ CC ❑ MC ❑ BV TI ETU ❑ DU ❑ SH ❑ WI ❑ KC Jurisdiction /Filmile Number: j Project Name: tr• .�s� G, ( • •jest Address:,3 ) ?Z r�-�,)' rte. TVF&R File Number: ID 6'-9t , (Whenever referring to this project please include the TVF&R File Number) Project approved Project not approved- Please address items checked below and re-submit plans for review and approval to the: ❑ TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office ❑ Planning Department having jurisdiction for routing to the TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office Project conditionally approved subject to correction of items checked below. This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 Editions of the Uniform Fire Code(UFC)and those sections of the Uniform Building Code(UBC)and Uniform Mechanical Code(UMC)specifically referencing the fire department,and other local ordinances, regulations and guidelines. 1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS; Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet.(UFC Sec. 902.2.1) 2)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1) 3)ADDITIONAL ACSLrSS ROADS; Where there are 20 or more dwellings, an approved second fire apparatus access roadway must be provided to a city/county roadway or access easement.(UFC Sec.902.2.2) 4)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not;ass than 20 feet(15 feet for not more than two dwelling units),and an unobstructed vertical clearance of cot less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.1) 5) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load(gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2) Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code. 6) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point.(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3) 7)DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district.(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4) 8)BRIDGES: Bridges shall be designed, inspected and final construction approved by a registered engineer. The bridge shall be designed in accordance with the American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials "Standard Specifications for X Highway Bridges." The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry 50,000 pounds. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.5) 9) NO PARKING SIGNS; Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway an' in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS "8.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(1)(2)&(3)) "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives Page 1 of 2 TVF&R File Number I 0 t'v 10)GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet.(UFC Sec.902.22.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level(maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. 11)PAINTED CURBS: Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked"NO PARKING FIRE LANE"at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high.(UFC Sec.901.4.5.2) x I2) • ulul t • - 1/l1■1 tat lu ul: S 41: .141 ;: kit.• The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute(GPM)required fire flow and one(1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) 13) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS; No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire appatatus access roadway.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) 14) SINGLE FAMILY DWELL. N =S - F F. HYD ANTS• Fire hydrants for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.2) 15)FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.4) 16) FIRE HYDRANT / FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection(FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief.(1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code,Sec.904.1.1) 1( 17)FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS ON BUILDINGS: Fire department connections shall not be located on the building that is being protected.(UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5) X18) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS -REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute(GPM)or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office.(UFC Sec.903.3) 19)SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS-REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s)are 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-1.(UFC Appendix III-A,Sec.5) 20) RURAL BUILDINGS -REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural buildings shall be calculated in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 1231. Please contact the Fire Marshal's office for special help and other requirements that will apply. (UFC Sec. 903.3) 21) ACCESS AND FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) / 22) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an application and instructions regarding installation and placement. )( 23)REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: Please contact the Fire Marshal's office at the appropriate times for inspection of the following: t e" 24) k 8 o pc. L a J kt r+ �� �S, J Sc ✓� 1 -,_- Caw: s) /Qt,�ess 25) Plan Reviewer Signature Title cc: Page 2 of 2 \N\ 3Q j Aoly00 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 8, 1996 TO: Elaine Self, GTE Engineering FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 ➢ ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY < The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -August 19, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Oic.M_oQE (ck.erJFk \.0 V16El CU►.l6ic— - C�7� S j Ct4-(C17r01s 4 ■ (P&C1S e thefo llo-winginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: J r� W 1 ESI-4,wip Phone Number(s): Sc b2G- 93 SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS AA Ail CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 8, 1996 TO: Brian Moore, PGE FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 ➢ ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY Q The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -August 19, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I EA We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P1 aseprovidethefoffowinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): C' -tG - 1�S1 SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • 4, .11/4*''' pNif!M I I RECEIVED p �J I TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AUG 1 5 1996 DATE: August 8, 1996 TO: Operations, Acting Maintenance Supervisor FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 ➢ ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -August 19, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P ase provide theft/Towing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS craf • CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: August 8, 1996 AUG 151996 TO: David Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts--(x-317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 ➢ ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY < The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -August 19, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date. please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide thefoffowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: August 8, 1996 AUG 1 5 1995 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 ➢ ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -August 19. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. glOKi Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: C -' P1,0)6e Deerit k EMPI.OY6CS FOR- Ppr2.l!5 SDC- COULD US£ "M HZ FOKMLU.A Fog- DG (Lt NItJCr P'KtOCr SPAGGS ? (58 FTE ?) $z,35Z.tro —AnI,M0N1 DVI51 WI' SDIZ 15 (.AND USE/PEStectJ OAL1 W LA)I IS(z POM IT'S SfPAP_PeT — MAY NEED Z SEPA(AT SITE--WORK__ PEXLAA ITS Fof-1 Fh1S JOt3 - I sW u ) I On-MP- S rtic 1410214- s'r E1DK-PCS nA ri- rota- Flu- ? (Please prmk&tfiefolCaun'ng information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I' �► Phone Number(s): 2h( I SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS N-c5v" A-% t‘Q•0\s \e V v� RECEIVED PLANNING z 41, ,/I CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AUG 15 1996 DATE: August 8, 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -August 19, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: .' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ��c�t C &( L ) (4, /�►dp ) 5 e N 0 171.12.& "±Oht e-r)cbee-- ac,c, 31—L51 e>V4(51\-a' YIA0)/1/47 r-0) (PCease provide thefolTo•wing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: '' Phone Number(s): x aao �1 SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: August 8, 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday -August 19, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Thaseprovide the folrawing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS e- -s sDe R pUEST FOR COWMEN, g6-00/g NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS a • CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (circle one} _CIT Area: (W) (S) (E) (C) Q Placed for review in Library CIT Book CD 1 // /CITY DEPARTMENTS _B✓ GG.DEPT./David Scott.e.,rm„officio �-�LICE DEPT./Kelley Jennings,c,+�.n««„ omc., TIONS/J . _CITY ADMIN./Cathy Wheatley.crR.coa« �!ENG.DEPT./Brian Roger.D...b,,,,«,,Renew c,q.,.« VCOM.DEV.DEPT./D.S.T.S ADV.PLNG./Nadine Smith, vbm.ws„o.rv.o, _WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,oo«,,,a,,, ,.,00.,,,o,,,,awBM SPECIAL DISTRICTS it - ✓_FIRE MARSHALL L NIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa.County Fire District 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro,OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA.CO.DEPT.OF LAND USE&TRANSP. _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N.First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St.#I6.Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland,OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Brent Curtis(CPA's) _STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _Jim Tice(IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _METRO _Mike Borreson(Engineer) PO Box 25412 Mary Weber _Scott King(CPA's) Portland.OR 97225-0412 600 NE Grand Avenue _Tom Harry(Current Planning App's) Portland,OR 97232-2736 _Lynn Bailey(Current Planning App's) _OREGON DLCD(CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street.N.E. _ODOT/REGION 1 _CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem,OR 97310.0590 Laurie Nicholson/Trans.Planning Larry Conrad.Senior Planner 123 N.W.Flanders PO Box 4755 _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 1 120 SW 5th _CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland.OR 97204 _ODOT/REGION 1,DISTRICT 2-A Mike Matteucci,Neighborhood Coordinator Bob Schmidt/Engineering Coord. PO Box 4755 _CITY OF DURHAM 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412 Beaverton,OR 97076 Planning Director Portland,OR 97225 Beaverton,OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO —CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard.OR 97281-3483 City Manager PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin,OR 97062 _6OTHER% Lake Oswego.OR 97034 _CITY OF KING CITY City Manager 15300 SW 116th Kinq City,OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC P' ORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Elaine Self,Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 Sw Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Beaverton,OR 97007 Beaverton,OR 97005 _NW NATURAL GAS CO. rno..:tsoslniaa.+ _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer foz(503)721.2503 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox,Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland.OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place 5-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton.OR 97006-4886 _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Clifford C.Cabe,Const.Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 5424 SE McLoughlin Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97202 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _AERONAUTICS DIVISION(ODOT) _DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _US POSTAL SERVICE _COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H.PARK _FISH&WILDLIFE Randy Hammock,Growth Cord. _PUC _DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station DEPT.OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY _U.S.ARMY CORPS.OF ENGINEERS Portland,OR 97229-9998 =OTHER— n,,b9*,\po,Nv,o,t«.10noiic m,r MAILING RECORDS 41* Al: City of Tigard.Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (Cluck box.box..rf.pptic.el.) (check appropnate box below) (Enter Pudic Heanng Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: • (Chock boa above,/applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Chock box above,.applicable) (check appro fate box below} O City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICEINOTICE OF DECISION/NO CE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of whic . attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each nam:. •erso (s) at the address(s) shown on the attached lis (s), marked Exhibit "B",did tie /17^ day •f .41_, • '4'- 199 , and deposited in the Unit:. State - - t , I .ay of /MY 199 ' , postage prepaid. ../Laii / ,,AlwA_ if/ Pre•7ed Notice' Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ) LTY of _, )1410. '. , 19 f''w. OFFICIAL SEAL A DIANE M JELDERKS I ZN , N :,:® COMMISSION NO Oa6ta2 NO ARIPUBU OREGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 ---- °�~ My Commission pires: ' 'FILE I FO.; ����yy i �`,,� NAME(S): r� 6.-0011 ae&#t CASE NO(S): TYPE OF NOTICE&DATE: EXr1T ' NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 CITY OF TIGARD ROGERS MACHINERY SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: ROGERS MACHINERY Site Development Review SDR 96-0018 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested to develop a 30,025 square foot light industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse. APPLICANT: David Hickman Architects OWNER: Rogers Machinery 700 N. Hayden Island Drive 14600 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, OR 97217 Tigard, OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I-L). LOCATION: The site is located at the south east corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lot 00501. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement are required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements.) Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the construction documents and financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee, and a sign installation and or streetlight fee is required. 4. The applicant shall provide the recommended measures, as listed in the letter from Kittelson & Associates, dated June 17, 1996, to enable the proposed access onto Bonita Road to function properly. Specifically: A. The driveway shall have a 50-foot turning radius, a 30-foot curb radius, and have minimum width of 40 feet. B. The driveway shall be located at least 200 feet west of SW Sequoia Parkway. If this spacing is not provided, the driveway will need to be limited to right/in, right/out for all traffic. C. The applicant shall install signs at the driveway to alert truck traffic that left turns are prohibited at this driveway. D. The applicant shall re-stripe the existing left turn lane in Bonita Road to provide for two-way left turns. The applicant shall submit a striping plan prepared and/or approved by Kittelson & Associates. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 2 E. The final plans for the driveway location and design shall be approved by Kittelson & Associates. Proof of their approval shall be submitted to the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way (ROW) at the corner of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius. The ROW dedication shall be parallel with the curb return and provide enough space for the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp. 6. The public improvement plans shall include the reconstruction of the curb return at the southwest corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius. The reconstruction shall also include the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp and any other modifications to existing utilities or drainage structures. 7. The public improvement plans shall include the construction of a new sidewalk along the frontage of SW Bonita Road. The width of the sidewalk shall be 6 feet. 8. Any connection to public water lines shall be shown on the proposed public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department. 9. The applicant shall submit a copy of the issued Corps of Engineers permit for the filling of the on-site swale area. 10. The applicant shall submit calculations pertaining to the filling of the swale. Specifically, the applicant shall show how and where the storm water that presently flows into the swale will be collected and carried through the site. Staff will need to be assured that the on-site storm system will be adequately sized to handle that water. 11. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 12. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the site improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 13. The property owner shall either consolidate the legal parcels into one parcel or enter into a joint access and maintenance agreement. 14. Additional walkways shall be designed from the entrance of the warehouse building to SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. A designated walkway shall be provided between the two new buildings. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 3 15. A minimum of one additional handicapped parking space is required to be provided if the warehouse is developed. A minimum of one of the handicapped parking spaces is required to be van accessible. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 16. The applicant shall provide a screening plan for roof top or other mechanical equipment, where necessary, based on final design plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 17. Floor plans and building elevations for the proposed warehouse shall be reviewed for compliance with the development standards of the Community Development Code in terms of setbacks, off-street parking, building height, off-street loading, etc. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. A minimum of one bicycle rack shall be relocated to the entrance of the proposed warehouse building. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 19. The applicant shall revise the plan so that the site obscuring fencing is not located within the Clear Vision Area at the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. 20. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement 1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: A. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and B. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. 2. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 4 SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES 1. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall: A. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and B. Approve and release such bonds. 2. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site has been designated for Light Industrial use since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. No previous development applications have been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north the site is adjoined by other properties developed for industrial use. To the west the site is adjoined by other existing industrial uses. To the east the property is adjoined by a restaurant. To the south the property is adjoined by the current Rogers Machinery site. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently undeveloped. Several existing trees are scattered throughout the site. The applicant proposes to develop an industrial building, a warehouse building and related site improvements. An open drainage swale that contains wetlands also bisects the property. Because this wetland is not identified as a "Significant Wetlands" as reviewed in the wetlands' inventories contained within the Comprehensive Plan, no City review of a Sensitive Lands NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 5 application is required to fill this area. The Division of State Lands states that no fill permit is required to fill the wetland area within the drainage swale. The applicant has also contacted the Army Corps of Engineers and is attempting to obtain a fill permit. A copy of the required fill permit shall be obtained prior to issuance of development permits. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to utilize the proposed buildings for light manufacturing uses and warehouse uses. These uses are classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Manufacture of Finished Products, Light Wholesale Storage and Distribution. Section 18.70 lists both use types as permitted in the Light Industrial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.70 states that there is no minimum lot width requirement in the Light Industrial Zoning District. Developments within the Light Industrial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has complied with this standard by proposing to landscape over 15% of the site. Setbacks: Section 18.70 states that a front yard setback of 30 feet shall be provided. Section 18.98 also states that no structures shall be developed within 30 feet of the centerline of SW Bonita Road or SW 72nd Avenue. No other setback standards apply other than Clear Vision and Landscape Screening that are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Light Industrial Zoning District also limits building height to a maximum building height of 45 feet. The applicant has provided a setback of 30 feet from centerline of SW Bonita Road and SW 72nd Avenue, in compliance with this requirement. The maximum height of the habitable portion of the proposed structure is 35 feet and is also in compliance with the development standards of this zoning district. Non-habitable portions of the structure are proposed to be at up to 45 feet. The Development Code does not specify a minimum height requirement for non-habitable architectural features. The applicant has not indicated the proposed height and setbacks for the warehouse structure. The warehouse building shall be reviewed and approved for compliance with setbacks, height, and other applicable standards prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.80, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these sections is reviewed elsewhere within this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These requirements are found to be inapplicable as approval standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 6 Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The applicant has addressed this requirement through an arborist report for the site. The preservation and/or replacement requirements are addressed elsewhere within this staff report. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has addressed this requirement by proposing to develop landscaping along the street frontages that adjoin this site. The applicant has also proposed to locate the warehouse building towards the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway to further screen loading and service uses from the street. No roof top or other mechanical equipment is shown on the preliminary plan. The applicant shall provide a screening plan for roof top or other mechanical equipment, where necessary, based on final design plans. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department has reviewed this plan and found these issues to have been sufficiently addressed as proposed. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has proposed to plant 19 Norway Maples at 30 feet on center. Due to their size at maturity, these trees satisfy the street tree requirements for this site. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 7 Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed building to be developed along the SW Sequoia Parkway frontage effectively screens all of the proposed parking lot areas from view. The applicant has proposed to develop additional landscaping along the SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road frontages. The proposed landscaping and site obscuring fencing appear to screen the parking lot from adjoining streets to the extent possible. The landscaping as proposed addresses the aforementioned functional issues except for the parking lot trees. Because a total of 112 parking spaces are proposed, a minimum of 16 parking lot trees are required to be provided. A total of 26 parking lot trees are proposed, in compliance with this requirement. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. No obstructions may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area at a street intersection is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance from the intersection of street right-of-way lines and then connecting these two, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The Visual Clearance Area at a driveway intersection in excess of 24-feet in width is measured from the corner of the driveway and street intersection for a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and 30-feet back from the driveway and street intersection and then connecting these two, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. With one exception, the plan as proposed does not put vision obscuring structures or plantings within the intersections on SW Bonita Road, SW 72nd Avenue, and SW Sequoia Parkway. The applicant shall revise the plan so that the site obscuring fencing is not located within the Clear Vision Area at the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.Minimum Off Street Parking Requirements states that a minimum of one parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area be provided for office space, a minimum of one parking space for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of warehouse, a minimum of one space for each employee on the largest shift and a minimum of one parking space shall be provided for 1,000 square feet of warehouse area shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to relocate parking spaces where the new construction will eliminate 44 existing parking spaces. The applicant also proposes to provide 20 spaces for the 6,795 square feet of new office space. A total of 26 employees are to be at the site during the largest possible NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 8 shift. The applicant has also proposed to provide 12 parking spaces for the future warehouse. The total number of parking spaces that are required to serve the proposed and existing building square footage is 102 spaces. A total of 112 parking spaces are proposed, therefore, the application is in compliance with the minimum requirements. The applicant has proposed to stripe approximately 38% of the required 102 parking spaces as compact spaces. This is not in excess of the 40% maximum allowed compact spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires a minimum of five disabled parking spaces if 101 to 150 parking spaces are provided. A minimum of one of these spaces is also required to be designed to be van accessible. The proposed site plan provides four handicapped parking spaces. A minimum of one additional space is required to be provided at buildout of the site. It is recommended that this space be provided near the main building entrance of the proposed warehouse. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Because the site is required to provide a minimum of 102 parking spaces, a minimum of seven bicycle parking spaces are required. A total of four bicycle racks, providing a minimum of eight parking spaces have been provided in compliance with this requirement. It is recommended that one of these racks be relocated to the entrance of the proposed warehouse building. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. Two loading areas have been provided, in compliance with this requirement. No floor plan or building elevations have been provided for the future 12,000 square foot warehouse. Floor plans and building elevations shall be reviewed for compliance with the development standards of the Community Development Code prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial use that requires more than 100 parking spaces provide two (2) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The applicant has proposed to develop one new driveway and to utilize two existing driveways, in compliance with this standard. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials is used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 9 feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The applicant has proposed a separated walkway system from the main building entrance of the new manufacturing building to SW 72nd Avenue. Because SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway also provide access to the site, additional walkways shall be designed from the entrance of the warehouse building to SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. A walkway between the two new buildings is also required. The proposed manufacturing building shall also provide a walkway system to SW Bonita Road. Parking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110(B) states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The applicant has proposed to connect with the parking lot on the adjoining industrial site. The property owner shall either consolidate the legal parcels into one parcel or enter into a joint access and maintenance agreement. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method is chosen, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and location of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant states that none of the existing trees are in excess of 12 inches in diameter. Upon review of the site, none of the existing trees appear to exceed 12 inches in diameter. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Planned Industrial Zoning District. The applicant has not requested signage for this property at this time. The applicant may apply for signage at a later date. Any such application will be reviewed for compliance with signage restriction for properties within this zoning district. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 10 PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Section's 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), 18.164.100 (Storm Drains), Water, Grading and Erosion Control shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site is adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road. SW 72nd Avenue is classified as a Major Collector street and is fully improved adjacent to this site. This site has an existing driveway onto the roadway near the middle of the site frontage. No additional right-of-way (ROW) dedications or street improvements are warranted. SW Bonita Road is also classified as a major collector street and is mostly improved except for a concrete sidewalk along the frontage and a substandard curb return at the Sequoia Parkway intersection (this will be discussed later). The applicant's plan indicates that they will construct the sidewalk adjacent to Bonita Road as a part of this project. The applicant is proposing to build a new driveway onto Bonita Road from the site. Staff had concerns with this proposal from the standpoint of impacts to the adjacent intersections of Bonita/72nd and Bonita/Sequoia Parkway. Staff is most concerned with the Bonita/72nd Avenue intersection and any impacts the driveway may have on the signal operation. The applicant submitted a report from Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated June 17, 1996 (letter signed by David Clark). A copy of this report was also provided in the applicant's materials for this site development review. Based on the traffic engineer's findings, the proposed site access should function properly without adversely impacting the local intersections. However, since truck turning movements may result in conflicts with other travel lanes in Bonita Road, it is recommended that left turns be restricted for trucks. Kittelson recommends that the applicant place signs within the site and at the access to alert truck drivers that left turns are not permitted at that driveway. Passenger car traffic could be allowed to make left turns at the driveway if it is located at least 200 feet west of the Sequoia Parkway intersection. The reason for this is to allow existing left-turning traffic to continue to turn into the industrial development north of Bonita Road without encountering conflicting left turning traffic into this site. Kittelson recommends that the current left turn lane on Bonita be re-striped to allow two-way left turns along approximately 300 feet of the site frontage. Kittelson stated that if the driveway is not located at least 200 feet from Sequoia Parkway, the driveway should be constructed as a right-in/right-out for all traffic. Staff concurs with the traffic engineer's findings but notes that the applicant's plan appears to not conform to the traffic engineer's recommendations. For instance, the driveway appears to only be 175 feet west of Sequoia Parkway, not 200 feet as recommended. The plans show "No Left Turn" signs to be placed at the entrance, but in Staff's experience, signs alone will not provide for the proper left-turn restrictions. In many cases where a "no left turn" driveway is installed, developers attempt to construct islands that Staff refers to as "pork chops". These islands are constructed to channel traffic out of the site in a right-turning movement and prevent cars from entering in a left-turning movement. However, there are many cases in the City, and other Cities, where these pork chop NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 11 islands do not work well in preventing passenger cars from making left turns. They do work well, however, in preventing large trucks from making the left turns. Staff recommends the applicant be required to implement the recommendations of Kittelson & Associates and, prior to issuance of the building permit, provide the City with a driveway location and design that is approved by Kittelson. SW Sequoia Parkway is classified as a local commercial & industrial street. The City improved this roadway several years ago through an LID, but was unable to provide a standard curb return at the southwest corner of the intersection with Bonita Road (the City was unable to acquire ROW from the subject site). Therefore, a substandard curb return was installed as a temporary measure with the intention that when the subject site develops, the curb return would need to be re-built. The temporary curb return only provides a 25-foot curb radius instead of a 40-foot radius required by City design standards. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to reconstruct the curb return at this intersection as a part of this project in order to provide a safe and functional 40-foot curb return. In order to install the new curb return, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW at the corner. The ROW dedication will need to be parallel with the curb radius and provide enough space for the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp to be included. This dedication shall be completed prior to issuance of the building permit. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 21-inch public sewer line in SW Bonita Road and an existing 10-inch sewer line in SW Sequoia Parkway, both of which are able to serve this site. The plans are unclear as to where the sewer service for the buildings will be directed. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm drainage from this site will be directed to the north end of the site where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility. From there, the storm water will be discharged into an existing 96-inch public storm line that presently crosses this site. The plans also call for the filling of an existing drainage swale on the site that picks up storm water from the southeast corner and conveys it to the north property line where it presently discharges into a 24-inch pipe at Bonita Road. The applicant has applied for a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to allow this filling. The applicant received notice from the Division of State Lands (DSL) that the swale does not fall under the category of a "wetland" and, therefore, a DSL permit is not required. The applicant's intention is that the swale will be filled and any storm water that presently flows into it will be picked up by existing on-site pipes. However, the plans do not indicate how or where this existing storm water will be collected. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide detailed plans and calculations for the modifications to the on-site storm system to make sure it is sized large enough to account for the loss of the drainage swale. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 12 STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant is proposing to install a biofiltration swale on the site to treat the new impervious areas. Staff did not receive preliminary sizing calculations with the application material, so was unable to determine if the swale area will be large enough to serve the project. From the plan view, it appears the facility will be adequate. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity that accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. WATER: This site will be served from the City's water system. There are existing public lines in Bonita Road and 72nd Avenue. The site is currently served from the City's system. The applicant's plans are unclear as to how the new buildings will be served. It is likely that they will be served from extensions of the on-site system. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police, Water, and Building Departments have reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and stated that the application as proposed is not approved. Plan details concerning the following issues shall be submitted to the Fire Marshall's Office: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 13 Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) except for crowning for water run-off. Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2). The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec 903.4.2.4). A Fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5). FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief. (1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1). Fire department connections shall not be located on the building that is being protected. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5). The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3). Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704). A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's office for an application and instructions regarding installation and placement. No other comments or objections have been received. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 14 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. Pc7/1-4 September 12, 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner Lv le' OU- September 12, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Beihersdorff DATE Planning Manager I\CURPLN\PATTY\SDR96-18 DOC NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 96-0018-ROGERS MACHINERY PAGE 15 1 1 I 1 CIA.w. nor i I rr.•. R CZ)ACO 1 ~ \ D0FITRA71GN AREA z g� � ` NEW PApGNC• •* M !1e fliI� I • [.ATE l e WO CAW. 2 ` 11 •-4nre cov L- .�_ FILL 5WALE w araaE ammo W - LOWER LEVEL TIE PERMIT GRAVEL Et1PACE _ VORA=WO as MEW roRTAio MANCH rAcurr e1 < 0-- �C — •..\`■••i _eghtia ��% ■� 111414/ W ell 3 �_ •r •Mir .In J 0 , \ NE LOADING • UPPER LEVEL :\ M 0. ` MLR!PAp7NCi y ` aaucJT a(1 TI4 .AMry/ALT - \\I I I I I I I t l �t� I4—NEW GATi�--2-� OF EXTENT of PROJECT Ji' ----- I Q 1 R + Q I !MT.° 1 0 1 WAiifiiQUN 1 1=TWO 'C TC HEADOLLARM I 1 I Um 0 II 1 i- 11 II U i SITE PLAN CASE NO. . EXHIBIT MAP N 1 Rogers Machinery SDR 96-0018 l \FCH CFNTFR f0PNnm K LN o R y� ,M, n n I 1 '--d C13 BONITARD —,A21 1 ` / ipp; 1,, vt SUBJECT 8 18 ■ --- PARCELS c.3 It c 1 .-c ! 1 1 11 C CC_ 1 CL z CARDINALLN 0 I 7 l s... !CU is?iA1, R DOOD L — , w * rk.•• � � CABLE LN 0._ , „,,,,,. _LI, ( f I Vicinity Map A SDR 96-0018 Rogers Machinery Company �b r5 Maanaril 5 V 91 -oat Q' Py it(/ 2S112AD-00301 2S112AC-02400 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 14725 SW 72ND TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 12AB-01000 2S 112AC-02300 '31G T INVESTMENTS C&C DEVELOPMENT ATTN: RICK TERRELL 14795 SW 72ND AVE 2314 SE PARKCREST AVE PORTLAND,OR 97224 VANCOUVER,WA 98684 2S 112AB-00900 2S 112AD-00900 FOUGHT AND COMPANY, INC. HOME DEPOT USA, INC PO BOX 23759 BY AVTAX TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 816368 ATTN: GINI PARSONS DALLAS IN 75381 2S112AC-00200 2S112AD-01100 NATIONAL SAFETY CO PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P 17010 SW WEIR RD 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#200-WMI BEAVERTON,OR 97007 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112AB-01100 2S11 2AD-00500 PIKE, RICHARD G TRUSTEE ROGERS MACHINERY CO INC 7235 SW BONITA RD 14600 SW 72ND AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 12AD-00501 2S1 12AD-00600 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC INC � DISTRICT CONTROLLER 14600 ND AVE 16000 CHRISTIANSEN BLDG 2#100 T ARDOR 97223 TUKWILAWA 98138 2S112AD-00400 2S112AD-00300 SMETS,JOHN E&MARIETTA D SMETS,JOHN E&MA- - A D TRUSTREES TRUSTREES 14633 OTTAWAY RD NE 14633 • ' •WAY RD NE AURORA,OR 97002 ' •'ORA,OR 97002 2S112AA-00500 2S112AA-00600 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP PO BOX 5909 PO BOX 5909 - PORTLAND,OR 97228 PORTLAND,OR 97228 2S112AD-00401 2S112AC-00101 TIGARD, CITY OF WHITLATCH, LOUIS SR AND 13125 SW 1-1,A PHYLLIS I PO 8 -23397 2979 RIV 1`LL RD TIGARD,OR 97223 OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S112AC-00100 WHITLATCH, LOUIS SR AND DAVID HICKMAN, ARCHITECT PHYLLIS I 700 N. HAYDEN ISLAND DR. 2979 RIVER DELL RD PORTLAND OR 97217 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 1 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)6B4-0360 Notice TT 8 6 2 8 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 'City of Tigard t) • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 1312 5 SW Hall Blvd. 19y6 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit • Tigard ,Oregon 97 �f► 17 96-0018 •Accounts Payable, pF [IGA� • SITE DEVELOPMENT INERY COMPANY< Icy >ROGERS MA `" "r°' The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story rww. industrial building and a 12,000 equ re foot corner warehouse building.72nd d 0OCA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LOCA- TION: The site is Road;(WCTM 2S1 12AD,Tax Lots 00500 and S.W.S Bonita Road;( l_L . APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: STATE OF OREGON, )ss ZONE: Light Industrial( ) COUNTY OF Kathy Snyder, ) Community Development g Chapters e1 18.70, and 8. 6, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, _ 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 1 �_ i hy Snyder r- — being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising � ' Amp Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard—Tualatin Times a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the SDR96-0018 Rogers Machinery Co. Iiiihkil» .411. 111111111 a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the , entire issue of said newspaper for_ ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: ?' September 12 , 1996 /1r ill 1_____] 1111.11111111 %Vane 3 Subscribed and savor, to before me this 12th day of September , 1 i,4.40.I: a IS K,I Notary Public for Oregon lkieC ■ 411 My Commission Expires: hfY CO AFFIDAVIT ii ra‘1141 . .„, mu, . MI w�j>, Milk�i 111111w i sans-'Ow The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 9'7223.The decision shall be d decision n Heal c°r" ber 23, 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal A and Section 18.32.370 of the mao - dun with Section 18ode,which provides that a written appeal muniw Den 10 days Code, given and sent.The deadline for filing filed within 10 days after notice is g an appeal is 3:30 P.M., ber 23 1996. T 8628—Publish September 12, 1996. - 1 c III 2S112AA00600 in 'S112AB0091 2S112AA00500 2S1 wig AMBOlvol CU 1 BONITARD 8 251 2AC00100 C70111 2S112AD00501 _ 2S112AC0021,■ 2S11 1 011)1 2S112AD00500 C 1 2S112ACO2400 • 2S112AD00600 ij, ., , 2S11 1!411'00 6:: j 2S112AC0i300 i 2S112AD00900 i L I il .4.41(13 I F: 1 CARDI NAL LN 4� 0 Zill • 0 r• I Vicinity Map SDR 96-0018 es�„o�k N Notification Map • 4116 pre_aff kad 1.g/p,6 vvi ige CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ITE pE OP m T ;EVIEW APPLICATIONd - % / CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. SOS' T - OO IPA OTHER CASE NO'S: NVA RECEIPT NO. t D -2sr NO APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: r NO 1 Z5D� DATE: 07- N-6/6 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ? Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 15e WIRJJ 2 of ! k, L.---qi pplication form (1) /N- -✓5E'-10Ki of 72hd /6tV /,. oi-'lt4' �D I I (// B) Owner' s signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 251 1J_Ab— JAI authorization T2S/g I IV, NE 14 5EG 12) tl.- 50o, S() 1 I (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 2 . (02 Act-7 h/, (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED FiOLDER*gOG1=gS MACH/WRY G& /Nc. /✓�(E) Plot plan (pre-app checklist) ADDRESS die r)o ✓4l� 71s'( � PHONE _ (F) Applicant's statement CITY TJ 1A _ ,, a2- ZIP e11201-414 (pre-app checklist) APPLICANT* RA/Ip r-40 1/4t J A455n:• A c*Frr -t , L1/ (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 700 (4. ti4IDJ is pg. PHONE 20G-2.25 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY 4 gTji/Jl7 4Z ZIP q 72 11 Filing fee ($ 1905- 6)0 ) *When the owner and the applicant are different (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE D�rTE . INED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 7/ / q6 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this rr / application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: if --9 �6 submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ZONE DE/SIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY L qLt- s/Y1a! / ��f--17jet /j.`Q/ The owners of record of the subject property �J / request site development review approval to um e . <ITT oi$� allow GDN`?"'72lAC•;I it J Dr#1 1/" -0(�~?Z Approval Date: 1y Na v & PfRKI -qv RS oAT P 4wci4- of 1 P Final Approval Date: I4ICJ I Iu %', //\• Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 IIP 4111P 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: NOljE. 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of JUL.-\-j 1917(Q SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of t e subject property. Jü4Me't o , . s'bazi (KSL:pm/0524P) ^ i�yi�i }�}f `I CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 96-0018 FILE TITLE: ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY APPLICANT: David Hickman, Architect OWNER: Rogers Machinery Company 700 N. Hayden Island Drive 14600 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, OR 97217 Tigard, OR 97281-4943 (503) 285-2256 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 30,025 square foot two story industrial building and a 12,000 square foot warehouse building. LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; (WCTM 2S1 12AD, Tax Lots 00500 and 00501). ZONE: Light Industrial (I-L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Chapters 18.70, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317 SDR 96-0018 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS li ROGERS COMPRESSORS MACHINERY RECEIVED PLANNING PUMPS COMPANY BLOWERS INCORPORATED JUN 121996 June 5, 1996 City of Tigard Post Office Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Subject: Facility Addition Gentlemen: We are proposing an addition to our existing facility at the corner of Southwest Seventy-Second Avenue and Bonita Road. The project will include a new building for office, equipment servicing, and warehouse needs with related paved parking and circulation areas. This addition will be located on the vacant corner adjacent to our existing buildings. This addition will also relieve severe overcrowding in our current facilities. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, June 19, 1996 6:30 p.m. 14600 S.W. 72nd Avenue (Corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Bonita Road) Portland, Oregon 97224 Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. Our architect and company officers will chair the meeting. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call the undersigned at 503/639-6151 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, i RGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. 440 . James D. Kirkmire President JDK:dhc /usr2/3f/3f.new-bldg PO BOX 23279,PORTLAND,OREGON 97281 • 14600 SW 72ND AVENUE,PORTLAND,OREGON 97224 Branches in Portland,Seattle,Spokane,Centralia,Eureka,Boise 503/639-6151 FAX 503/639-1844 Providing Sales,Service, Parts,and Rentals SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW for the CITY OF TIGARD A New PORTLAND BRANCH PRODUCTION - OFFICE FACILITY for ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. DAVID HICKMAN ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS,PC �li161 / e DITMOMODNKM■nOgiCallg9ArehlteetSeNgtpAl Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subject: Site Development Review for the Portland Branch of Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. Project Description: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. will develop a new Portland Branch facility adjacent to their existing Corporate Headquarters on a 2 . 6 acre vacant site owned by Rogers Machinery Co. , Inc. The development will include a 30, 025 square feet two story building, a future phase 12, 000 square feet warehouse and parking for 100 cars (113 cars for future phase) . The project will house functions currently existing in the adjacent overcrowded facility. Zoning District Dimensional Requirements: The current zoning of Light Industrial (I-L) allows for this use. The proposed site coverage will be 17 .4 percent (28 percent after the future phase) . The maximum building height from finish floor of the lower level to the ridge line is 45 feet. The building setback from S.W. 72 nd Avenue is approximately 140 feet. Landscape area will be 24 ,002 square feet (20, 199 square feet after the future phase) which is 21 percent of the site area (17 percent after the future phase) . Permeable site area (landscaping, car overhang landscaping, and graveled storage yard) total is 34, 133 square feet (30 percent) , 21, 227 square feet after the future phase (18. 6 percent) , thus, the impervious site area is less than 85 percent. the attached plan shows these respective areas. Special Setbacks: The building setback from the center line of S.W. 72 nd Avenue is 140 feet, exceeding the 30 feet minimum setback requirement. 1/4 700 North Hayden Island Drive, Suite 350, Portland, Oregon 97217, 503- 285-2256, FAX 503-285-4362 Parking and Access: This development will provide for 100 cars (112 cars after phase 2) . Business Support Services: 6795 s.f. / 350 s.f. per car = 19. 4 cars Manufacturing: 13 stations x 2 employees per = 26 cars Warehousing: _ 10, 417 s.f. / 1000 = 10.4 cars Warehousing Future Phase: 12 , 000 s. f. / 1000 = 12 cars Relocate Existing Spaces to Allow For New Building: 44 cars 39 parking spaces (39 percent) shall be compact spaces. Dimensions shall meet the zoning requirements. 4 of the parking spaces shall be 'accessible' as required by the Uniform Building Code and one of these spaces shall be a 'van space' . A 40 foot curb cut access exists at S.W 72 nd and at S.W Seqouia Parkway. In addition, a right-in and right-out 40 wide access with 30 foot radius curbs will be provided off of S.W. Bonita Road (an Access Analysis by Kittelson and Associates is included) . Bicycle racks shall be provided near building entrances and work areas for a total of 8 bicycles. Walkway Requirements: A walkway shall connect the entrance to the new building to the entrance of the existing building. Loading Area Requirements: Loading areas are located at the north side of the lower level and at the south side of the upper level. Both of these loading areas are within the sight obscuring security fence. Clear Vision Area: All site access drives shall provide for the 30 foot vision clearance requirements. 2/4 Landscaping: A Landscape Plan is provided with this submittal and demonstrates an intent to meet the City of Tigards requirements. Landscape area exceeds the minimum 15 percent requirement. All landscaping shall be fully irrigated. Signs: A project sign will be located near the intersection of S.W 72 nd Avenue and S.W. Bonita Road. A sign permit will be obtained at the appropriate time. There is no need for any exceptions to the City Sign Code Sensitive Lands: A man made swale on the proposed site meets the criteria used to delineate a wetland as determined in a wetland determination study conducted by Fishman Environmental Services. The report recommends, because of the artificial nature of the swale, the wetland not be considered jurisdictional by either the Division of State Lands or the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Both of these agencies concur. An application for a fill permit has been submitted to the U.S Army Corp of Engineers. A geotechnical investigation was completed by Carlson Testing, Inc. and all site work shall conform to the recommendations of -this report. The report will be included as part of the project construction specifications. Tree Removal Plan Requirements: There are no trees with a 12 inch caliper at four feet above the ground (as defined by section 18 . 150. 020 of the Tigard Municipal Code) . Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was scheduled and all property owners within 250 feet of the site were notified as were the members of the Community Involvement Teams. No one attended the meeting and no comments were received. Off-Site Improvements: Sidewalks shall be provided along S.W. 72 nd Avenue the length of the proposed Site Development area and along S.W. Bonita Road frontages. Sidewalks shall be 6 feet wide including the curb. A sidewalk exists along S.W. Seqouia Parkway. All off-site improvements shall be constructed to the City of Tigard standards. 3/4 Storm Water Quality Control: All storm water run-off shall be collected and directed thru a Bio-filtration area before discharging into a public storm drainage system. The bottom of the filtration area shall be 6 foot wide and 200 foot long and shall slope a minimum of 1 percent and a maximum of 2 percent. Side slopes shall be a maximum of 3 : 1 slope to allow grasses to be mowable. The Landscape Plan calls out the landscaping of this area. Solid Waste Management: The existing Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. facility has a solid waste management plan in place. The new facility will be included in this existing plan. Screening: Mechanical Equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent property. Screening will be determined during the construction document process as equipment needs are determined. Emergency Access and Circulation: Circulation around the buildings is designed for semi- truck access as part of the facilities operation. This inherently allows for emergency vehicle circulation. Public Transportation: Tri-met has shown no interest in this project. They have not responded to inquiries made on May 30, 1996. Conclusion: It is the intent of the project to satisfy all of the City of Tigard Site Development Review requirements. Sincere rent Premore, Architect David Hickman associate Architects, P.C. .. .; " /4- _w. nas®INDo-T-tee CFa(4=D.ak:..2, 0 ..:„,ti 11 : /Blo-FILTRATIem AREA _ u - -+C_ -1\SIGHT C� SIGN — FENCE NEW PARKING e T -.=*�"*. _Rr. f 1 I 1 [ I 1 I Cs"7E t -- y! 100 GARS . • s o * • . , 'v V -- ® t n —-1 > d 1 I +—GATE I FUTURE <J — COVERED LOADING WAREHOUSE ®< P t LOWER LEVEL GRAVEL SURFACE t NM BTORACsE YARD •.. ,—%///% I ` I 9� U. D .. ( lai g .. PEW PORTLAND BRANCH FACLJrY '�A�■ III ANINPANIIImIs All > ■ NM !III'i::. ..,. < .ie.r•_. I r gl P. �i� S 0. W ...0 14' a1 1,... , - • WI .... • • " . • . ( ; - . 0• III MB COVET D LOADING �`� NEW GATE 0 ; x ii Emu UPPER LEVEL ‘%\ ` W 3 / 1 = I i iI) SAiCUT EXI!1P ASPHALT , I I I I I I I I ! I " r M ,,, is-WEW GATE' (LINE OF EXTENT OF P}�JECT) i� \s■ I L I + I * e l l Y! 3 Tf 1 I 1 r I EXISTING I WAREHOUSE ! ! I I EXISTING CORPORATE FEADOUARTERS I I J j I e-Job Ho-0.02 I NORTH A1.1 aSCALE a of Oj FTE PLAN�.w.o... m 10 2m 5� FEET n• ..,, 404S 3F (105 ) 1310-FILTER AREA• 6588 3F 1 15 9F 3669 3F ..1149 SF (259 5F) \--GAR OVERHANG LANDSCAPE AREA, TYP. (144 8F) - GRAVEL AREA 9103 5F 830 5F� / (91 5F) (91 SF) L--� i PROJECT AREA. 113,926 5F 113 3F //! H (---‘ 531 41 J 0 415F — — , (SO 3F) (8m 8F) (SO 3F) qs 3603 5F cl — 1214 3F + (144 SF) L 861 5F SF S S • / - --\,,., It1PERVIOUS AREA: PHASE 1 . 19193 3F p �+ PHASE 11 • 92,639 5F LANDSCAPE DSCAPE AREAS 1/15/°.00 K TRANKITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. N SPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING bIC t,VV ALDER SU.TF?CO • POIi-_AVC,t`n 9%;V: • (503)22f,.523() • fAX(5033 273$'69 June 17, 1996 Project#:2089 Trent Premore David Hickman Associate Architects 700 N. Hayden Island Drive, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97217 RE: Roger's Machinery Access Analysis I)ear Mr. Premore: in response to your request, Kittelson& Associates, Inc. has completed its review of the proposed access location for the Roger's Machinery expansion on SW Bonita Road in Tigard, Oregon. Kittelson & Acco ciates has determined that the access driveway can be constructed on SW Bonita Road without adversely impacting the traffic operations of the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkwav;SW Bonita Road intersections. .lhe change%mane to the original proposed access location and design has addressed our concerns involving truck access and left-turning conflicts on SW Bonita Road. In order to accommodate selected truck turning movements at this access driveway, the access driveway should he designed with a 50'turning radius,a 30'curb radius, and have a minimum width of 40'. With this design,there should he no restrictions placed on passenger vehicles using this driveway However, since left-turning trucks entering and exiting a street from a site driveway often swing wide and block traffic, this access driveway should he a right-turn in/right-turn out only driveway for trucks. Furthermore, since Roger's Machinery has the ability 0., explicitly direct how the truckss.entcr and exit the site the site, Roger's should instruct their own drivers and delivery drivers that left-turn are not to-be executed at this access driveway. Signage to this extend should be placed in strategic locations near the access driveway to remind truck drivers that left-turns are not allowed in order to accommodate the left-turning vehicles presently turning into the industrial lands north of Bonita, the Roger's Machinery driveway needs to he located far enough wort so not to interfere with these existing turning movements. Kittelson & Associates recommends that the existing left-turn lane be re-striped to accommodate a two-way left-turn lane on SW Bonita along 300'of the site's frontage. A two-way left-turn lane allows for turning movement:: into both industrial developments. Based on our estimate, locating the access driveway 200' from the intersection of SW Sequoia Parkway/SW Bonita Road will minimize the left-turn conflict area. If the left-turns conflicts cannot be separated, a right-in/right-out access driveway should he located at the original location, approximately 110'from SW Sequoia Parkway. Attached is a drawing illustrating the preferred access location and re-striping. 1 trust that this letter adequately addresses the concerns involving the access request being made to the City of 'I igard by Rogers Machinery. Please feel free to call if there are any concerns or questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, K�1"f�'Ej.�v" ASSOCIATES, INC:, David E. Clark Engineering Associate Lk: Brian Rager,City of I tgard RILE NAME:1 f' .OJFILE120g9\rINAL resit CALCULATION/DESIGN RECORD Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering DATE (. /.;!,t PROJECT r �2 r: g s Btu 5W Alaer,Suue 700 • Portland OR 97205 �.,�� Telephone(503)228.5230 Fax:(503)2734189 PROJECT NAME Vol Er i 0a:A-t; E.n it kaipdxOago►a.►drop.com SUBJECT s7 r e e , or,-1-.'en, Br n; c SHEET r / OF .' { ms 's ci •I 0 i 1 t . h • „„,;niA '911,14'1-At � I I Fishman Environmental Services 434 NW Sixth Avenue • Suite 304 Portland, OR 97209-3600 April 25, 1996 /' 503-224-0333 Jim Goudzwaard, Regulatory Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208 Re: Wetland Determination for Rogers Machinery Site SE corner of SW 72nd Ave /SW Bonita Rd., Tigard, Oregon T2S, R l W, NE 1/4 Sec. 12, Tax lots 500, 501; Washington County Dear Jim, At the request of David Hickman, and on behalf of Rogers Machinery,we are submitting our wetlands determination report on the subject site for your review. The site has been disturbed by past fill activities and the piping of Ball Creek which used to flow north of the site and near or in the northwest corner of the site. Wetlands occur on site in a stormwater drainage swale that crosses the property from south to north. The origin of the swale is a 24-inch pipe located at the south end of the property and it discharges into another 24-inch pipe beneath Bonita Road. The bottom of the swale contains the three criteria that define wetlands and includes approximately 680 square feet. Although the stormwater drainage swale is a wetland by definition, it appears to Cbe artificial. Rogers Machinery would like to connect existing drainage pipes on the north and south sides of the subject site and fill the existing drainage swale. I have included additional background information regarding site history and soil profiles provided by Rogers Machinery and their Geotechnical consultants in the Appendix of the report. We are interested to find out whether DSL or the Corps will take jurisdiction on this drainage wetland in order to advise our client how to proceed. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your speedy attention to this matter. Sincerely, NOTE, Teti S R Po g-t wi 1-1- MApE Al/t1 LtFs6 £ fo vi K5Qu T. GONTA T Christie Galen PAVlD t"f ►�!R-N A55OC fE1GN-( (-1-ty evpoP-r T m--t{ LONG) C: Janet Morlan, Division of State Lands David Hickman, Architect FAX: (503)224-1851 �y 6 Printed on Recycled Paper(40% pre-consumer, 10% post-concumerl Pi FACE RErYri F ?�-� May 28, 1996 RECEIVED r MAY 29 igss • Christie Galen Ats'd. es” D ; v 1 5 ! O N - r Fishman Environmental Services 434 NW Sixth Avenue, Ste. 304 S T A T E L A N D — Portland, OR 97209-3600 STATE LAND F:, ,,RD 10-FN A !UTZHAKA Governor Re: Wetland Delineation for Rogers Machinery Site, Tigard, rrl::I:EISLI\L Det. #96-0192 .,cn.Yar of Sat, )At HILL State Tre,A5Wtr Dear Christie: 775 Summer s-7.2Vt NE Sa!im, OR 973i;,-1377 (503) .378-3805 I have reviewed your wetland delineation report and the supplemental site FAX (503) information for the above site and, based upon the information provided, TTN t` 3) 37L+-4615 concur with your conclusion that the stormwater conveyence ditch was constructed from upland. As such, it is not subject to permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law. A federal section 404 permit may be required for the planned culverting and fill. Thank you for the documentation. Please phone if you or your client has any questions. Sincerely, ann-04- C Janet C. Morlan, PWS .__ Wetlands Program Leader c: City of Tigard Planning Department Jim Goudzwaard, Corps of Engineers Bill Parks, DSL rcgerG Coc p7l Of � DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY .1V -T 1996 PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O.BOX 2946 PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 June 4, 1996 ATTENTION OF Operations, Construction, and Readiness Division SUBJECT: Permit Application No: 96-596; Wetland Determination/Delineation Report Review Check List and Portland District Corps of Engineers Response David Hickman Associate Architects Attn: David Hickman 700 N. Hayden Island Drive, Suite 350 Portland, Oregon 97217 Dear Mr. Hickman: I have completed my review of the wetland report submitted on April 29, 1996, by Fishman Environmental Services for work on the Rogers Machinery Site at Section 12, Township 2S, and Range 1W, in Washington County. Based upon the information supplied, I concur with the conclusions of the minor wetland and other water locations totalling 680 square feet as shown on Figure 4 of the report. Work within those areas may require a permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Please contact Dan Gresham, Project Manager, at (503) 326-7731 for further permitting requirements. This wetland jurisdictional delineation is valid for a period of five years from the date of this letter or unless new information warrants revision of the delineation before the expiration date. For further clarification, please contact me at the above address or telephone (503) 326-5500. Sincerely, 4110 Goudzw. .t etlands Specialist Policy Analysis Section Copies Furnished: ODSL reaN et ll•l. EPA (Portland) 1 Fishman Environmental (Galen) '1 M AefucATio N f CO-GP (Gresham) .ifte few ; 0' ��' 4' ASV/ I c irX/1 i3giecgADU A c-•itec--t Nap Zia& District Engineer July 16, 1996 Portland District, Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208 Subject: 'Fill Permit ' for a swale (wetlands) on the Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. property. PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION: Rogers Machinery Company shall develope the vacant property adjacent to there existing Coorporate Headquarters into their Portland Branch facility. The existing Portland Branch is housed in the crowded Corporate Headquarters facilities. The proposed development will include a two story building housing production, and warehouse activities as well as support office space, (approximately a 28, 500 square foot two story building - a 16,200 square foot foot print) . Parking for 100 cars will be required. In addition, provisions will be provided for a phase 2 warehouse (12,000 square feet) . Rogers Machinery Company Inc, employs over one hundred personnel. An 8 1/2"x 11" Site Development Plan is included with this application. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES: Filling of the Swale allows for the construction of a portion of the building and parking lot over the swale area. Storm water drainage from the impervious areas of the development will be drained through a Bio-filtration area to the public storm drainage system. This design affords the most practical method for providing for Rogers Machinery Company's needs and remaining accountable for storm water drainage. 700 North Hayden Island Drive, Suite 350, Portland, Oregon 97217, 503- 285-2256, FAX 503-285-4362 MI s.w. LED cZ:vu•uav_ IF=8 4:::1)A..¢> 0 �E310-FILTRATION AREA lia �1 i 0156CURIN3 C.)a FfNOP --- ��I = ° eIGr4 I�#I1 - =ems..' r raw PARKING t T �'"�/~ 111`V/I ` 'r� — ®� g IPJOCARS gar. o . • • .4 � sa04 . o ��w , r 1 •-GATE CoveleEID Lazia. ,_ ' FILL 5WAL.E + ruRAF0 U9! ® R g — r 1 _ LOWER LEVEL � . THIS PERMIT aT SURFACE ^^_► Ili, 1 1 ig 2.— — — ■. • ( i Z _ — — ;. �1 ow NEW PORTLAND BRANCH FAC`frY .■.. > g a o ■■■■,,,,■■■■ ::::�+III::: •��1 Y ( 9- ...� JI IX gir6>— ii _ ■.- _ spa,,, --- .■ Wills - < 1 m N la 'I ] i 3■■--.■ ��� • •�� �GOVEi.W LO4DIN4 ; •� • r $ .� UPPER LEVEL FUTURE PARKING! W I A i i \ /I I I I i I I / 9AUIGUT EXISTING A3YNALT r 1 . a�1 NEW GATE` (LINE OF EXTENT OF PROJECT) i I ' 0 I i C 1 EXISTING WAREHOUSE I 1 \ FEAoo ART Te I �� I [Job NoYw. . I NORTH All a D PL[Crll eC E I Ip— FEET o AA•.f...�,. • . y RECEIVED PLANNING AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE JUN 0 6 iggg WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard PIanning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 James D. Kirkmire , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed facility affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Bonita Road , and did on the 5th day of June 19 96 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a building application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and Bonita Road; on S.W. 72nd; on S.W. Bonita (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the presence o a Notary Public) James D. Kirkmire (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 5th day of June , 19 96 OFFICIAL TEAL CAAAA__ (3 . D(.t.„51 ANN R DAM0SON ONEGON NOTARY`.` COMMISSIONNOA6 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON !) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY OIL MOO ; My Commission Expires: 5/5/2000 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) r`MME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: New Building TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: facility expansion Name of ApplicantiOwner: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. I Address or General Location of Subject Property: corner of S .W. 72nd Ave. & Bonita Rd. Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 2 S 112 AD 0 0 5 01 h:'Jog inlpattyvnasters\affpost.mst • ROGERS coMPRESSOR , \CHINERY PJW'S LOMPANY BLOWERS I N C O R P O E ATE D June 5 , 1996 City of Tigard Post Office Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Subject: Facility Addition Gentlemen: We are proposing an addition to our existing facility at the corner of Southwest Seventy-Second Avenue and Bonita Road. The project will include a new building for office, equipment servicing, and warehouse needs with related paved parking and circulation areas. This addition will be located on the vacant corner adjacent to our existing buildings. This addition will also relieve severe overcrowding in our current facilities. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, June 19 , 1996 6 : 30 p.m. 14600 S.W. 72nd Avenue (Corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Bonita Road) Portland, Oregon 97224 Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. Our architect and company officers will chair the meeting. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call the undersigned at 503/639-6151 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. • James D. Kirkmire President JDK:dhc /usr2/3f/3f .new-bldg PO BOX 23279,PORTLAND,OREGON 97281 • 14600 SW 72ND AVENUE, PORTLAND,OREGON 97224 Bronches in Portlond,Seattle,Spokone,Centro l o,Eureka,Boise 503/639-6151 FAX 503/639-1844 Providing Soles, Service, Parts, and Rentals ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. 14600 S.W. 72 nd AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97224 Subject: Mailing list for Neighborhood review of the proposed Portland Branch development. City of Tigard Community Involvement Teams Spieker Properties LP P.O. Box 5909 Portland, Or 97228 National Safty Co. 17010 S.W. Weir Road Beaverton, Or 97007 Alpha Limited Partnership 14725 S.W. 72nd Avenue Tigard, Or 97224 Mr. Louis Whitlatch Sr. 2979 Riverdell Road Lake Oswego, Or 97034 Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. 16000 Christensen Road #2 Tukwila, Wash. 98188 John and Marietta Smets 14633 Ottoway Road N. E. Aurora, Or 97002 Home Depot U. S.A. , Inc. P.O. Box 816368 Dallas, Texas 75381 Pacific Realty Associates LP 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway #200-wm Portland, Or 97224 Mr. Craig Hopkins 7430 S.W. Varns Street Tigard, Or 97223 Mr. Mark F. Mahon 11310 S.W. 91st Court Tigard, Or 97223 List Continued: Mr. Joel Stevens 9660 S.W. Ventura Court Tigard, Or 97223 Pat Wyden 8122 S.W. Spruce Street Tigard, Or 97223 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (CIT'S) NOI II I(A I ION I 1SF FOR AI'PI!CAMS WI I I I I AND USE PROPOSALS , WEST CIT LAND USE SUIBCOMD/1TTEC 1 CAST CIT SOUTH CIT CENTRAL CIT • Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude Mary Swinlek Jack Bielhan Brian Martin 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 9915 SW hewing.#23 15525 SW 109111 Avenue 10965 SW Pathfinder Way Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard.OR 97223-3930 (503)524-1068 (503) 524-0994 (503)639-2529 Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Craig Hopkins John Bennelh 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court 7430 SW Varns Street 15550 SW 1091h Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard.OR 97224 (503)524-6325 (503)524-4550 (503)630.0894 • Kathie Kallin Christy I lerr Linda Masters Mark F. Mahon 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 11386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)524-5200 (503) 590.1970/(503)624-8009 (503)620-7662 Ed I lowden Barbara Saltier Scott Russell • Joel Stevens 11829 SW Morning 11111 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Road 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 9223 Scappoose,OR 97056 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)524-6040 (503)684-9303 (503)543-2434 Bonne 8 Jim Roach June Sullfridge Cal Woolery Pat Wyden 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)590-0461 (503)590-0523 (503)590-4297 Karl Swanson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard,OR 97223 (503)590-3369 PLEASE NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet,notice of meetings on land use proposals in the West CIT area shall be sent to all the names on this list. II IIOWnlpall ornate.sxmnoi K fond Ifil4M • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) 1, James D. Kirkmire , being duly sworn, depose and say that on June 5, , 1996 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S .W. Bonita Road a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Tigard, Oregon with postage prepaid thereon. . ---__) 014411A, . \(__,, Signature (In the presence o a. Notary PuGT1 James D. Kirkmire (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 5th day of June 19 96 .0 .,) NOTAYPOREG OFFICIAL SEAL . , -v- ANN S.DAVIDSON l COMMISSION N A62d16 6. '; MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 06,2000 �11�1��������- ��1�����1,- NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 5/5/2000 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) IE OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: New Building _•E OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: facility expansion Name of Applicant•Owner: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. Address or General Location of Subject Property: corner of S.W. 72nd Ave. & Bonita Rd. I Subject Property Tax Map(s)s »and Lot s): 2S 112AD 0 0 5 01 --------------------------- ft;Jocln pattyvnasterstaftrnad mst AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, James D. Kirkmire , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed facility - affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and 'S.W. Bonita Road and did on the 5th day of June 19 96 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a building application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and Bonita Road; on S.W. 72nd; on S.W. Bonita (state location you posted notice on property) • .i6/1406,4 u . \( Signature (In the presence o a Notary Public) James D. Kirkmire (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 5th day of June , 19 96 ; . -. OFFICIAL SEAL CL,v‘AA_— r . D&1.34 .. t.2,-„z = ANN S.DAVIDSON ! `" ®'' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ; `�'� coMMISSION N0.062646 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON 1` MY COMMISSIONEXP1RESA+lAY06,a000 My Commission Expires: 5/5/2000 -.., ,. ._X11-�111ti�-�ti�, (Applicant. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) IE OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED N.tMIE: New Building .•E OF PROPOSED DEVELOP\IENT: facility expansion Name of Applicant/Owner: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. �Address or General Location of Subject Property: corner of S.W. 72nd Ave. . & Bonita Rd. !subject Property Tax Ma (s)and Lot#(s). 2 S 112 AD 0 0 501 h:'Jogn\patty'mastersufpost mst • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) James D. Kirkmire , being duly sworn, depose and say that on June 5 , , 19 9 6 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Bonita Road a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Tigard, Oregon with postage prepaid thereon. 1ti1/4/1. Signature (In the presence o a o ary u James D. Kirkmire (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 5th day of June 19 96 OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY 0aAICID-OEORE G ON J . J COMMISSION NO.06M MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY CS, CS NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 5/5/2000 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) rNA_`IE OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: New Building TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: facility expansion Name of Applicant.Owner: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. Address or General Location of Subject Property: corner of S.W. 7 2nd Ave. & Bonita Rd. I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 2 S 112 AD 0 0 5 01 n:uog in\pattykrnasters+affmaII.cost ROGERS COMPRESSORS MACHINERY PUMPS COMPANY BLOWERS INCORPORATED J 5 996 Spieker Properties LP Post Office Box 5909 0}(1\11r ° Portland, Oregon 97228 Subject: Facility Addition Gentlemen: We are proposing an addition to our existing facility at the corner of Southwest Seventy-Second Avenue and Bonita Road. The project will include a new building for office, equipment servicing, and warehouse needs with related paved parking and circulation areas. This addition will be located on the vacant corner adjacent to our existing buildings. This addition will also relieve severe overcrowding in our current facilities. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, June 19, 1996 6: 30 p.m. 14600 S.W. 72nd Avenue (Corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Bonita Road) Portland, Oregon 97224 Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. Our architect and company officers will chair the meeting. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call the undersigned at 503/639-6151 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. James D. Kirkmire President JDK:dhc /usr2/3f/3f.new-bldg Po BOX 23279,PORTLAND,OREGON 97281 • 14600 SW 72ND AVENUE,PORTLAND,OREGON 97224 Branches in Portland,Seattle,Spokane,Centralia,Eureka,Boise 503/639-6151 FAX 503/639-1844 Providing Soles,Service, Ports,and Rentals Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. cc: Mr. Trent Premore David Hickman Associate Architects, P.C. , A. I .A. 700 North Hayden Island Drive, Suite 350 Portland, Oregon 97217 Phone: 503/285-2256 Fax: 503/285-4362 cc: Mr. Walter B. Novak Mrs. Ann B. Davidson Mr. David Gordon co co zt —1 o 0 - o ,,.r o a. 0 51 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (CFT'S) a NOTITICA1 ION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS N CI . WEST CH NJ) USE S17IICCMMMM]TTEE EAST CST SD Tfl CST C NTRAL C7T GID cn i rn Abdullah Ikadl Clark 0. eller Bever' Freuda Craig Hopkins Jack Bfell an Brian f'hc rain [ 11905 SL!1251h Cowl 13200 S 1 Shore Dries 12200 SW Dull Mountain Road 7130 SW Varns Street 15525 S')/109th Avenue 10965 S \I Pathfinder Wey o -Tigard,O- 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,0 97224 -Tigard, R 97223.3930 {503)524 1050 (503)52 -0994 (503) .39-2529 Bill Gross Larry W:sierman ' Kathy %milli' Mark F,Mahon John Ben eth 11035 135th Avenue 13655 5 Fern Slreai 11645 ..VV Cloud Court 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 S 109th Avenue Tigard,O" 97223 Tigard, oR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 1 Tigard, O 97224 1 N (503)524 6325 (503)5.4-4550 (503) :49.0894 O C, N H 3 r H Kathie Kal o Christy err Linda asters Joel Stevens r a 0 12940 Glacier Lily Drive ' 11386 • Ironwood Loop 15120 .VV 141st Avenue , 9660 StN Ventura Court co Tigard,O' 97223 Tigard, IR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 cn Hi (503)'524-.200 (503)5'0-19704503)524-8009 (503) :'0.7662 o H Ed Howde Barba-. Saltier Scott •• ssell Pat Wyden i 11829 'Morning Hill 11245 'W Morgan Court 31291 aymond Creek Road 8122 SW Spruce Sheet ` Tigard,0 97223 Tigard, SR 97223 Scapp..se,OR 97056 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)524-.040 (503)6:4-9303 (503)5.3-2431 ' d Bonne&J Roach June S Itfridge Cal Wo••lery ti 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive 15949 'W 148Th Avenue 12358 •W 132nd Court co Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, PR 97224 Tigard, tin 97223 r` I (503)590-['461 (503)5.0.0523 (503)59# 4297 -ti. . co m Karl Swans•n 11410 SW onwood Loop , [°n Tigard,CR :7223 {Q (503)550- 1169 PLEASE N 11'IT: In addition to property owners within 250 feet,nolice of meeliiigs co on and use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list. N �� - - - -- �- � - -��-- "-r!. -avuN![ersYllna[I[.m5[ +--I •Apr9e I ' m i Post-it•Fax Note 7671 °ale SJ 9 TINA" I co■ To �j 1`1 +{7r;15f�l (� From vj i/ N .lJ,9AQEA -, Go1Dep1. Co. o F f f 6 i o Phone II Phone,ii 39 -Lin / ,- i c- F Fax b ( 330-/ - )$t.r L ax _ II 1 ' . , '30 '96 09:04AM FIRST AMf ?TLE CUSTOMER SERVICE '47--. r` c ' P.3 * First American/Washington l : RQ5109 Parcel : 04 Xferd:aa ce .er: SPIEKER PROPERT ES LP P 10510904 Lte: 14280 SW 72ND A TIGARD 97224 ' r $10 ail : PO BOX 5909 POR LAND OR 97228 Pre: $414, 690 se : 2312 MISC,NON-M G, IMPROVEMENT, IND ZONE elephone : Thomas Bros : 655 06 Imp: $967, 230 ap and Tax Lot : 25112 • 00500 95-96 Tax: $19, 192 .6 edrm: Bth: B: Lot Sqft : 148, 104B1dg Sf : Ac: 3 . 40 2 * ---_-- -- - First American/Washington owner: NATIONAL SAFETY CO Parcel : R0511191 lte : 17010 SW BONITA RD TIGARD Xferd: 08/31/93 fail : 17010 SW WEIR RP BEAVERTON OR 97007 Price: rse: 2312 MISC,NON-M'G, IMPROVEMENT, IND ZONE Land: $241, 700 'elephone: Thomas Bros : 655 G6 Imp : $479, 080 tap and Tax Lot : 25112"C 00200 95-96 Tax: $10, 010 .4 tedrm: Bth: B : Lot Sqft: 84, 942 Bldg Sf: Ac : 1 . 95 ; 3 * First American/Washington * )caner : ALPHA LIMITED PP .TNERSHIP Parcel : R0511226 Site : *NO SITE ADDRES'* Xferd: 09/21/93 flail : 14725 SW 72ND • TIGARD OR 97224 Price: $1, 400, 000 Ise : 2312 MISC,NON- FG, IMPROVEMENT, IND ZONE Land: $525, 700 Telephone: 503-598-4700 Thomas Bros: Imp: $891, 670 nap and Tax Lot : 25112 •C 02400 95-96 Tax: $19, 684 . 9 ledrm: Bth: . YB; Lot Sqft : 182, 516B1dg Sf : AC: 4 .19 .k 4 * First American/Washington * 9wner: WHITLATCH LOUI' SR Parcel: R0511235 Site : *NO SITE ADDRE-S* Xferd: Mail: 2979 RIVENDELL RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 Price : $30,460 Use ; 2312 MISC,NON- FG, IMPROVEMENT, IND ZONE Telephone : Thomas Bros: Imp: $57, 970 Map and Tax Lot : 2S11 .AC 00100 95-96 Tax: $1,228 . 14 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft ; 8, 276 Bldg Si : Ac: .19 * 5 * First American/Washington * Owner: RYDER TRUCK RE 'TAL INC parcel : R0511333 Site : 14750 SW 72ND •VE TIGARD 97224 Xferd: 10/31/95 Mail : 16000 CHRISTEN'.EN RD #2 TUKWILA WA 98188 Price : $880, 000 Use; 2312 MISC,NON- FG, IMPROVEMENT, IND ZONE Land: $493 , 100 Telephone : 206-242-52 '7 Thomas Bros : 655 G6 Imp: $197, 720 Map and Tax Lot : 2S11'AD 00600 95-96 Tax: $9, 594 .38 Bedrm: Bth: YB ; Lot Sqft; 123 , 27531dg Sf : Ac: 2 . 83 * 6 *- First American/Washington * Owner: SMETS JOHN E; ' -IETTA 0 Parcel : R0511342 Site: *NO SITE ADDRE•S* Xferd: 10/16/95 Mail : 14633 OTTOWAY •D NE AURORA OR 97002 price: Use: 3002 VACANT, I .USTRIAL Land: $24, 390 Telephone: Thomas Bros: Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S11!AD 00400 95-96 Tax: $338 .74 Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 6, 098 Bldg Si: Ac : . 14 * 7 * Fir'st American/Washington * Owner: SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION Parcel: R0511351 Site : *NO SITE ADDRE-S* Xferd: Price: Mail : and: Use : 3002 VACANT, INPUSTRIAL Land: Telephone: Thomas Bros: Map and Tax Lot : 2S11 .AD 00400 95-96 Tax; Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 6, 098 Bldg Sr : Ac: .14 The Informatio Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is ilot Guaranteed. R=96% 503 795 7577 05-30-96 10: 06AM P003 #34 30 '96 09:04AM FR: 1ER TITLE CUSTOMER SERVICE P.4 *- -- First American/Washington * ,er: SMETS JOHN E; • :IETTA b Parcel : R1233864 ,.te : 6830 SW BONITA :- 1 TIGARD 97224 Xferd: 10/16/95 nail : 14633 OTTOWAY - 1P NE AURORA OR 97002 Price : Use: 2312 MISC,NON-M 0, IMPROVEMENT, IND ZONE Land: $240 , 440 I Telephone : Thomas Bros: 655 H6 L-np: $203, 730 Map and Tax Lot : 2S1120 00300 95-96 Tax: $6, 168 . 80 Bedrm: Bth; . B : Lot Sqft : 6, 098 Bldg Si: Ac: 1. 38 * 9 * First American/Washington * Owner: ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY Parcel : R1298456 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd; Mail : 14600 SW 72ND A ' TIGARD OR 97224 Price : Use : 3002 VACANT, IND STRIAL Land: $432, 110 Telephone : 503-639-6151 Thomas Bros: Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 28112"D 00501 95-96 Tax: $6, 001 .34 Bedrm: Bth: B : Lot Sqft: 108, 028B1dg Sf : Ad : 2 .48 * 10 * First American/Washington * Owner: TIGARD CITY OF Parcel : R2004293 ; Site: *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd: 06/16/89 Mail : PO BOX 23397 TI ARD OR 97281 Price: $278, 250 Use: 9152 GOV, CITY Land: $6, 100 Telephone : Thomas Bros : Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S11 ' 11 00401 95-96 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 26, 571 Bldg 8f : Ac; . 61 * 11 * First American/Washington Owner: SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION Parcel : 82004294 Site: *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd: Mail : Price: Use: 3002 VACANT, I IUSTRIAL Land: Telephone : Thomas Bros : Imp: Map and Tax Lot ; 2S11.AD 00401 95-96 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 26 , 571 Bldg Sf : Ac : . 61 * 12 * First American/Washington * Owner : HOME DEPOT USA INC Parcel : R2006631 Site : 14800 SW SEQUO A PKY TIGARD 97224 Xferd: 05/04/93 Mail : PD BOX 81.6368 DALLAS TX 75381 Price : $4 , 585, 000 Use: 2012 COM, IMPRO , D Land: $1, 933 , 280 Telephone : Thomas Bras : 655 G6 Imp: $5, 711, 190 Map and Tax Lot : 2S11 'AD 00900 95-96 Tax: $106 , 169 . Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 485, 258B1dg Sf: Ac : 11. 14 * 13 * First American/Washington Owner: PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P Parcel : R2006633 Site : *NO SITE ADDRE.S* Xferd: Mail : 15115 SW SEQUO A PKY I#200-WM PORTLAND OR 97224 Price : Use : 3002 VACANT, IN/USTRIAL Land: $750 Telephone : Thomas Bros: Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2511!AD 01100 95-96 Tax: $10 . 39 Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 3, 049 Bldg Sf : Ac: . 07 * 14 * First American/Washington * Owner: UNION CENTRAL IFE Parcel : R2006890 Site: *NO SITE ADDRE-S* Xferd: Mail : Price ; Use: 3002 VACANT, IN2USTRIAL Land: Telephone: Thomas Bros: Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S112AD 00600 95-96 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft: 123,274B1dg Sf ; Ac: 2 .83 The Informatio Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. R=96% 503 795 7677 05-30-96 10:06AM Pnnd ifna 30 '96 09:05AM FRST ! TITLE CUSTOMER SERVICE P.5 * First American/Washington * er: UNION CENTRAL L I'E Parcel ! R2006891 .ate : *NO SITE ADDRES..* Xferd: Mail : P-rice : Use: 3002 VACANT, INDISTRIAL LL d: Telephone : Thomas Bros : Imp! Map and Tax Lot : 25112' ' 00501 95-96 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: . B : Lot Sqft: 108, 028B1dg SE: Ac: 2 ,48 * 16 * First American/Washington * Owner: WHITLATCH LOUIS SR Parcel : R2006895 Site : *NO SITE ADDRES,.* Xferd: 06/01/81 Mail : 2979 RIVENDELL - • LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 Price: Use : 3002 VACANT, IND STRIAL Land: $28, 850 Telephone: Thomas Bros : Imp : Map and Tax Lot : 281124C 00101 95-96 Tax: $400 . 66 Bedrm: Bth: B : Lot Sqft : 7, 840 Bldg Sf: Ac: . 18 * 17 * First American/Washington Owner: UNION CENTRAL L FE Parcel : R2006896 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd: Mail : Price: Use : 3002 VACANT, I ' STRIAL Land: Telephone : Thomae Bros: Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 25112 'C 00101 95-56 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: B: Lot Sqft : 10,454 Bldg Sr : Ac: .24 The Informatio Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. R=96% 503 795 7677 on-2n-QA In• nRAM pnnR'tt'I4 . - -•-- "- - - • ' ''' " , . .........__.._ , • _._. _..2._rt. SE 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 12 T2S R I W WM. 2S I I2AD WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON I 1 . SCALE 1st= 1001 —4-- SEE MAP -.-. In 0 ED (CR 636-4d BONITA T 1111+20.94 ROAD -I' gE"at". CANCELLED TAX LOTS 601,600,600 8A-1,DOI, IF Nit., At. 636 43_suipsz .1 WIDE 4. -. • ,396, •1 r INITIAL...............„..,,,,,„,„_,......,......tr, ..,....OCT%/777/70/7 "."" .............., ,•••• 1101M-1,1001,10011d-1, 396 :-. POINT i -8 -8 ell.X. 32 ROOS 61 b ie -,„,, ..e ...: 0 ...: 0 $' .... 111 0 8 Ac. Li 501 16420 - XII EAST . •5' Z.4 i .... t - -- _A . rrl ----- 501-M 1 ....,... I, -,,, I TO PUBLIC 1013/923 100 062.16,20"E IT MON/lc 'so i2o.ao;_ 4 0 I 100 AI LO t " .6/AC. 200./1 > -,. 401-MI 300 ./6 AC • y-'„t Q k tk, 138 AC. \ I L L../-.. —1 s - in 200-M1 -A c-,, 528 121 4 r•-• lc \NZ In .e■ 0 gr . .... -io (........' 1 . 500 -,i <311 1.--' 'in In e. v I ot-lia c) La i 2.71 Ac. 500-MI v. ....___400 ip.: Pi on ./4 AC. 4 (€.\ 400 MI I..,.... N 1 D. CI-) I 1 Cr 0 I 1 I u Z ) I 1 .., we se 396' T2.30.... • III 4.20 ( 116') 11 1119°57' 'E 0 441 526.59' II•120421 • ' - is.075 AC FOR ASSESSMENT 600 1100 t./.. ../ PURPOSES ONLY . c 1,,. t. DO NOT RELY ON Z83 AC AC. , 1200S01 900 :. - r Z,',', 600-MI •5 11.14 AC. FOR ANY OTHER USE r 1200 SO 1 x t'• / - C.) J WI . I„- ei -! ‘... - le I' i 11 CII'.1 0 \ ILI:c 0 ‹; • <;', ..... 0 N • —,K /• \ • VI C .7., N,.. ‘..„,./ 264 Z64' 4./ JEAST 0 ..,c I . 0 (s) 700 112 77) 23-8 I 194Aa I J 1,, 700-M1 lif < I t 1E <„, 9 11 1. - 1 • ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS '' - S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINF'„'.S P(L L 17.R M 17 PVI<TLAND DISTRICT REGULA .JRY 1v' 'W,4 PROGRAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMITMENT PUBLIC SERVICE IS A PUBLIC TRUST. WE AS CORPS REGULATORS MUST EARN THIS TRUST.,AND TO KEEP THIS TRUST WE MUST CONDUCT OURSELVES IN A MANNER THAT REFLECTS THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES: PROFESSIONAL -We will conduct ourselves in a professional manner in dealings with all our customers, including applicants, violators, agencies,tribes, environmental organizations, development interests and the general public. FAIR AND REASONABLE-We will be open-minded, impartial, and consistent in our interactions with all our customers to ensure all actions and decisions are free from bias and are not arbitrary or capricious. Customers will be treated equally and with tolerance. KNOWLEDGEABLE-We will strive to remain knowledgeable on applicable laws,regulations, and scientific and technical advances which affect our program. HONESTY -We will be truthful, straightforward,and candid in all dealings with our customers. TIMELINESS -We will strive to provide our customers with timely — regulatory responses regardless of whether those responses are favorable or adverse. ACCOUNTABILITY-We will be decisive in all actions and accept responsibility for any of our decisions and resulting consequences, Our decisions will be factual and properly documented. RESPECT -We will treat our customers with dignity, courtesy, compassion, and sensitivity. _ C t�..T n/ ,,.. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY C 2 PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O.BOX 2946 PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 August 8, 1996 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF. • Operations, Construction, and Readiness Division SUBJECT: Permit Application No: 96-596; Provisional Nationwide Permit Rogers Machinery Attn: James Kirkmire 14600 SW. 72nd Tigard, Oregon 97224 Dear Mr. Kirkmire: We have reviewed your application (Enclosure 1) for Department of the Army authorization to fill 0.016 acres of wetland near Ball Creek, at Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, in Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Based on the information included in your application, the proposed work would be authorized under the terms of the nationwide permit described below subject to the conditions found at Enclosure 2. However, water quality certification from Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has not been issued for this nationwide permit. Therefore, according to Federal law, the proposed work is not authorized until you secure water quality certification from DEQ. Water quality certification for your proposed work will be considered by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Mr. Tom Rosetta, telephone (503) 229-5845. By copy of this letter, we are notifying DEQ of your proposed work. If water quality certification is issued, any imposed conditions will become a requirement of your authorization. Nationwide permit 33 CFR 330, Appendix A, Section B, 26, authorizes discharges of dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters provided: a. The discharge does not cause the loss of more than 10 acres of waters of the United States; b. The permittee notifies the district engineer if the discharge would cause the loss of waters of the United States greater than one acre in accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For discharges in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must also include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands. (Also see 33 CFR 330.1(e)); and • -2- c. The discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent, is part of a single and complete project. For the purposes of this nationwide permit, the acreage of loss of waters of the United States includes the filled area plus waters of the United States that are adversely affected by flooding, excavation or drainage as a result of the project. The ten-acre and one-acre limits of NWP 26 are absolute, and cannot be increased by any mitigation plan offered by the applicant or required by the District Engineer. To insure the work qualifies for the above nationwide permit, you must comply with the following requirements: 1. No work is to be performed in the waterway or adjacent wetlands until water quality certification is secured from DEQ. 2. You must obtain permits, where required, under Oregon's Removal/Fill Law and appropriate local authorizations. Authorization for your work is valid until two years beyond the date of this letter unless the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. If you have any questions regarding our nationwide permit authority, please contact me at the above address or telephone (503) 326-7731. Sincerely, anie :resham III ' oject Manager Regulatory Branch Enclosures Copies Furnished: ODSL (Parks) DEQ (Rosetta) w/Application CO-GP (Black) w/Application s.W. 1i=1►CZ)1N00ir"ft. URI OZ71/v0a 0 • ________ I..' JiI �— BIO-FLL TF�4TICr1 AREA +�� ' "e_.).::: i g 3 /"....Z......T.:., GF�NT Pigw PARKJNICa gKsdTlOpa aNci,PQCE `'� ��I , C*ATEr =--� >� , we CAN25 411014 . . . . L . . . ». ••I 10111 w l ♦ I l Ai.�.�.�. e—..1 •-4ATE CO NET) 1_0••.� �FTILL 5WAL.E FUTURE p ki f LCIUER LEVEL I 1• I HI5 PERMIT` GRAVEL oto 6U A i-._ _ - - --1 �i I ,cif` (Al / Iv , - is I. MEW PORTLAND BRANCH FACILITY M• ( C W ElIFITiNl■- .oxt� x --, & re 1.�� J C � — • r- fir.. J '� N ..-nee MEW w�� .. , -4 0 » xi \` �iuF REP vE�°°"'� i\ rurur PARKING.► `c�i�II 1 n■ -sOUX,11T kX19TI1 Y� A9YN ALT ice - I I I I I I { I f I r ( CCCC �(.INE OF EXTENT OF PROJECT) i ` a , 111 . �� GATE` -/ I r r rr I I ( 1 I+ lxltlTO I I waffo GNOG - CxisTwa CO FaPORAT! I —"'. I FEADQIARTEiiO I '1 I Cob Noel I I . A1.1 iIORTM of D OC+1LE �� fYe ' . iMIMM. D 10 10 DO SET w. a e y . ■/ . u ' 1 District Engineer July 16, 1996 Portland District, Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208 Subject: ' Fill Permit' for a swale (wetlands) on the Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. property. PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION: Rogers Machinery Company shall develope the vacant property adjacent to there existing Coorporate Headquarters into their Portland Branch facility. The existing Portland Branch is housed in the crowded Corporate Headquarters facilities. The proposed development will include a two story building housing production, and warehouse activities as well as support office space (approximately a 28, 500 square foot two story building - a 16, 200 square foot foot print) . Parking for 100 cars will be required. In addition, provisions will be provided for a phase 2 warehouse (12 , 000 square feet) . Rogers Machinery Company Inc, employs over one hundred personnel. An 8 1/2"x 11" Site Development Plan is included with this application. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES: Filling of the Swale allows for the construction of a portion of the building and parking lot over the swale area. Storm water drainage from the impervious areas of the development will be drained through a Bio-filtration area to the public storm drainage system. This design affords the most practical method for providing for Rogers Machinery Company' s needs and remaining accountable for storm water drainage. • 700 North Havdon Island Drive Suite 350. Portland. Oreoon 97217. 503- 285-2256 FAX 503-2P5-4362 JOINT 0 oa PERMIT APPLICATION FORM :- U S Army Corps � z Engineers ) ortland District r e s Corps Action ID Number 96-596 Oregon Division of State Lands Number 96-0192 SEND A SIGNED COPY OF YOUR APPLICATION TO BOTH AGENCIES District Engineer ` ' State of Oregon ATTN: CENPP-PE-RP Division of State Lands P0Box2946 l 1"I I, r 775 Summer Street NE �,,,_ Portland, OR 97208-2946 Salem, OR 97310 503/326-7730 503/378-3805 o, pcs Rogers Machinery Applicant Name James Kirkmire business phone #639-6151 and Address 14600 SW 72nd home phone # Tigard,OR 97224 FAX # o Co-Applicant David Hickman Assoc. Arch. business phone # 285-2256 • o Authorized Agent 700 N Hayden Island Dr Suite 350 home phone # o Contractor Portland OR 972117 FAX # Name and Address Property Owner (if different than applicant) business phone # Name and Address home phone # FAX # PROJECT LOCATION Street, Road or other descriptive location Legal Description SE corner of SW 72nd AveISW Bonita Rd Quarter Section Township Range NE 12 2S 1W In or Near(City or Town) County Tax Map# Tax Lot# Tigard Washington 2S112 AD 500, 501 Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Ball Creek Is consent to enter property granted to the Corps and the Division of State Lands? ®Yes o No • PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION Activity Type: B Fill o Excavation(removal) o to-Water Structure o Maintain/Repair an Existing Structure Brief Description: Fill swale for parking and building Fill will involve cubic yards annually and/or 100 t cubic yards for the total project cubic yards below the ordinary high water or high tide line Fill will be Riprap is Rock o Gravel o Sand o Silt o Clay o Organics s Other-Native Soil Fill Impact Area is 680 sq ft length; width; depth. t l S t u;t 5 Removal will involve N/A cubic yards annually and/or N/A cubic yards for the total project cubic yards below the ordinary high water or high tide line Removal will be o Riprap o Rock 0 Gravel o Sand o Silt o Clay n Organics o Other N/A • Removal Impact Area is N/A Acres;N/A length,N/A width, N/A depth. • Estimated Start Date 9/1/96 Estimated Completion Date 11/1/96 Will any material,construction debris,runoff,etc enter a wetland or waterway? o Yes No tf yes,describe the type of discharge and show the discharge location on the site plan. N/A I • PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE & DESCRIPT• Project Purpose and Need. See attached DHAA Letter. Project Description: See attached DHAA Letter. Vegetation Disturbance:Vegetation in the bottom of the swale is dominated by cattail and water parsley. Vegetation on hillslopes is dominated by ornamental plantings. How many project drawing sheets are included with this application? 2 NOTE: A complete application must include drawings and a location map submitted on separate 81/2 X 11 sheets. PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. See attached DHAA Letter. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction)to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. See attached DHAA Letter. NOTE: If necessary, use additional sheets. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION Adjoining Property Owners and Their Addresses and Phone Numbers See attached list List all other approvals or certificates received,applied for, or denied that are related to this application. Issuing Agency Type of Approval Identification Number Dates of application/Approval/Denial m ITY/COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIr (to be completed by local planning official) ❑ This project is not regulated by the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. This project has been reviewed and is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. This project has been reviewed and is not consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. XConsistency of this project with the local planning ordinance cannot be determined until the following local approval(s) are obtained: ,/� ❑Conditional Use Approval A Development Permit ❑ Plan Amendment ❑Zone Change ❑Other An application Xhas ❑has not been made for local approvals checked above. Signature(of local planning official)Title City/County Date COASTAL ZONE CERTIFICATION If the proposed activity described in your permit application is within the Oregon coastal zone,the following certification is required before your application can be processed. A public notice will be issued with the certification statement which will be forwarded to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development for its concurrence or objection. For additional information on the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program,contact the department at 1175 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 or call 503/373-0050. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the proposed activity described in this application complies with the approved Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program and will be completed in a manner consistent with the program. DA 41 O L. v44 exisAikr,i 6 T- - ot4.I.A . PrintJT e Name Title VZ fin Applicant Signature Date SIGNATURE FOR JOINT APPLICATION (REQUIRED) Application is hereby made for the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application,and,to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority including the necessary requisite property interests to undertake the proposed activities. I understand that the granting of other permits by local,county,state or federal agencies does not release me from the requirement of obtaining the permits requested before commencing the project. I understand that local permits may be required before the state removal-fill permit is issued. I understand that payment of the required state processing fee does not guarantee permit issuance. Print/Type Name Title Applicant Signature Date I certify that I may act as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. • • Print/Type Name Title • • Applicant Signature Date • .JUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMAL (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) Ate Conditions of impact area Impact area is ❑Ocean ❑Estuary ❑River ❑ Lake ❑ Stream s Freshwater Wetland Note: Estuarine Resource Replacement Is required by state law for projects involving Intertidal or tidal marsh alterations. A separate Wetlands Resource Compensation Plan may be appended to the application. Has a wetland delineation been completed for this site? s Yes ❑ No If yes, by whom: Fishman Environmental Services,April 1996 Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource (use separate sheets and photos, if necessary) Most of the project site is gently sloping to relatively flat, landscaped with mowed lawn and scattered ornamental plantings.Wetlands on-site are limited to a man-made storm drainage swale.The origin of the swale is a 24-inch concrete pipe which is clogged with rocks and soil.Wetlands occur at the bottom of the 6 foot deep swale which is approximately 10 ft wide at the south end and narrows quickly to 3 to 4.5 ft wide.Soils are a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2)silty clay loam with a very dark gray gleyed soil(5Y 4/1)at 9 inches. Vegetation is dominated by cattail (OBL)and water parsley (OBL)and includes willow,water starwort,and soft rush.Vegetation on adjacent hillslopes of the drainage channel includes coast pine,rhododendron,red hawthorn,laurel, pampas grass,hazelnut,Himalayan blackberry,and sword fern. RESOURCE REPLACEMENT MITIGATION Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidably impacted wetland resources Wetlands that will be impacted by this project are man-made.Stormwater drainage from the— development will be treated through a bio-filtration system before entering the public storm drainage system.This pre-treatment should protect downstream waters. •Because this information Is not necessary for a complete application,you may submit this sheet and other environmental information after submitting your application. • Corps Action ID Number: 96596 DSL Number: 96-0192 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: 2S112AD-00500 & 501 2S112AD-00401 ROGERS MACHINERY CO INC TIGARD, CITY OF 14600 SW 72ND AVE 13125 SW HALL TIGARD , OR 97223 PO BOX 23397 TIGARD , OR 97223 OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET 2S1 12AC-02400 2S113AC-00101 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHITLATCH, LOUIS SR & PHYLLIS 14725 SW 72ND 2979 RIVER DELL RD TIGARD , OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO , OR 97035 2S1 12AB-00900 2S1 12AB-01000 FOUGHT AND COMPANY INC BIG T INVESTMENTS PO BOX 2375G ATTN: RICK TERRELL TIGARD , OR 97223 2314 SE PARKCREST AVE VANCOUVER WA 98684 2S112AD-01100 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES LP 2S112AC-00200 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200 WMI NATIONAL SAFETY CO PORTLAND , OR 97224 17010 SW WEIR RD BEAVERTON , OR 97007 2S 1 12AD-00500 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC 2S112AB-01100 DISTRICT CONTROLLER PIKE, RICHARD G TRUSTEE 16000 CHRISTIANSEN BLD. 2 #100 7235 SW BONITA RD TUKWILA WA 98138 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S1 12AD-00300 2S1 12AD-00400 SMETS, JOHN E & MARIETTA D SMETS, JOHN E & MARIETTA D TRUSTEES TRUSTEES 14633 OTTAWAY RD NE 14633 OTTAWAY RD NE AURORA , OR 97002 AURORA, OR 97002 2S1 12AA-00500 2S112AA-00600 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP PO BOX 5909 PO BOX 5909 PORTLAND , OR 97228 PORTLAND, OR 97228 2S1 12AC-00100 WHITLATCH, LOUIS SR & PHYLLIS 2079 RIVER DELL RD LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 • NATIONWIDE PERMIT CONDITIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS: The following general conditions must be followed in order for any authorization by a nationwide permit (NWP) to be valid: 1. Navigation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation. 2. Proper maintenance. Any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety. 3. Erosion and siltation controls. Appropriate erosion and siltation controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed soil and other fills must be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. 4. Aquatic life movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the movement of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species which normally migrate through the area, unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. S. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance. 6. Regional and case-by-case conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions which may have been added by the division engineer and any case specific conditions added by the Corps. 7. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; or in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study river" for possible Inclusion in the system, while the river Is in an official study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service. 8. Tribal rights. No activity or its operation may impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights. 9. Water quality certification. In certain states, an individual state water quality certification must be obtained or waived (see 33 CFR 330.4(c)). 10. Coastal zone management. In certain states, an individual state coastal zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained or waived. (see Section 330.4(d)). 11. Endangered Species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act, or which is likely to destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. Non-federal permittees shall notify the district engineer if any listed species or critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project and shall not begin work on the activity until notified by the district engineer that the requirements of the Endangered Species Act have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Enclosure 2 12. Historic properties. No activity which may affect Historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places is authorized, until the DE has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C. The prospective permittee must notify the district engineer if the authorized activity may affect any historic properties listed, determined to be eligible, or which the prospective permittee has reason to believe may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the National Register of Historic Places. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: In addition to the General Conditions, the following conditions apply only to activities that involve the discharge of dredged or fill material and must be followed in order for authorization by the nationwide permits to be valid: 1. Water supply intakes. No discharge of dredged or fill material may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except where the discharge is for repair of the public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization. 2. Shellfish production. No discharge of dredged or fill material may occur in areas of production, unless the discharge is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity. authorized by nationwide permit 3. Suitable material. No discharge of dredged or fill material may consist of unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, etc.) and material discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts (see section 307 of the Clean Water Act). 4. Mitigation. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States must be minimized or avoided to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e. on-site), unless the DE has approved a compensation mitigation plan for the specific regulated activity. 5. Spawning areas. Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. 6. Obstruction of high flows. To the maximum extent practicable, discharges must not permanently restrict or impede the passage of normal or expected high flows or cause the relocation of the water (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound waters). 7. Adverse impacts from impoundments. If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. 8. Waterfowl breeding areas. Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. 9. Removal of temporary fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to their preexisting elevation. 41i On On eft, August 21, 1996 i \ DSL James Ki rkmi re DIVISION OF • Rogers Machinery 14600 SW 72nd STATE LANDS Tigard OR 97224 STATE LAND BOARD JOHN A. KITZHABER Governor RE: State File No . 11877 PHIL KEISLING Ball Creek -- Fill Project Secretary of State JIM HILL State Treasurer Dear Mr . Ki rkmi re• 775 Summer Street NE Salem,OR 97310-1337 (503) 378-3805 We have received your application for placement of fill FAX (503) 378-4844 material within a ditch created from an upland source . TTY (503) 378-4615 Please disregard the letter sent to you on August 7 , 1996 . The Division of State Lands does not have jurisdiction over your activity, therefore a state permit is not required. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and local planning department before beginning construction. Please contact me if you have any questions . Sincerely, (, ,(Agt William L. Parks Natural Resource Coordinator • rf24 : 97 c: Dan Gresham, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers David Hickman Associates City of Tigard DMID HICKMAN ���'`� 1 , 8 l M1f11A. ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS, PC w H��'(;.;,inl 700 NORTH HAYDEN ISLAND DRIVE SUITE 350 y PORTLAND,OREGON 97217 G� ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. September 12, 1996 14600 S.W. 72nd Ave. t% ‘3� Portland, Oregon 97224 44, F DD1V ' y Prro' ADDENDUM NO. ONE - to Rogers Machinery Project Manual dated 8/20/96 book No. 1 ( BID PACKAGE NO. 1, SITE WORK PACKAGE ) . This addendum modifies, supplements and clarifies drawings and specifications and is made a part of the construction documents. SPECIFICATIONS: ITEM #1 Add to Alternate #2. Dry weather parking lot earthwork. After topsoil is removed allow subgrade to dry. Proofroll with a loaded dump truck to evaluate the condition of the subgrade. CT1 will be present to observe the proofrolling and identify soft spots. Soft areas will be over excavated. Removed soils will either be aerated, replaced and compacted or discarded so that crushed rock may be used for replacement. Once the proofrolling and stabilization of soft areas is completed, the subgrade will be compacted to 92 percent of the modified proctor (AASHTO T-180) maximum dry density and tested. The fill in the parking lot should be tested after every 2 vertical feet of material placed. Change page 02200-3 Line 27, to read "Place and Recompact to 92 percent T-180. ITEM #2 Add to Alternate #1. Dry Weather Building Pad Preparation. Excavate 19 1/2" below finish floor slab, prepare subgrade as in Item #1 above. Provide 12" compacted 3/4"-0 gravel as required in Alternate #1 or provide 6 inches of cement treated base topped with 6 inches of 1 1/2"-0 gravel compacted to 95% of T-180. Add leveling course, vapor barrier, sand and concrete slab. (See letter from Carlson Testing, Inc. , dated August 29, 1996. pRAWINGS: ITEM 1A-1. SHEET C-2: assume the fireline and F.D.C. , off of S.W. 72nd Avenue, shall be a 6 inch service. As an alternate, provide for price for a 4 inch service. Note that the building fire sprinkler system for the Portland Branch building shall be bidder design. ITEM #A-2. SHEET C-2: Provide a fire hydrant at the corner of S.W. Bonita Road and S.W. Sequoia Parkway with an 8 inch D.I. connection to the water main at S.W. Sequoia Parkway. Refer to drawings #1 and #2. ADDENDUM NO. 1 (CONT. ) ITEM #A-3 . SHEET A1. 1: Assume the retaining/foundation wall on the west, south and east sides of the building to have a four foot projection with the bottom of the footing at elevation at 144 . 50 . This is for site escavation purposes only. ITEM #A-4 . SHEET C. 2 & T. 1 : The existing two conduits extending from the corner of the existing warehouse are irrigation water lines. These shall be capped and abandoned at the respective building. ITEM #A-5. SHEET A1 . 1: Off-site improvements are by a separate permit/contract. ITEM #A-6. GENERAL: Existing landscape boulders are to be removed from the site. Provide a unit price (add or subtract from the contract) , per truck load, to not remove the boulders from the site. ITEM #A-7 . SHEET A1. 1: Provide a "French Drain" as per Drawing No. 3. This "French Drain" shall occur the full length of the Portland Branch Facility Building West, South and East walls. It shall connect into the storm drain at the northwest corner of the building. ITEM #A-8 . SHEET A1.1: Extend the walkway from the Portland Branch Building main entry to the proposed sidewalk at S.W. 72nd Avenue. Provide stairs as per Detail 9/A1. 2 , as required for the grade change. Refer to Drawing No. 5. ITEM #A-9 . SHEET A1. 1: Revise the sight obscurring fence at the corner of S.W. Bonita Road and S.W. Sequoia Parkway to maintain the City required "vision clearance" requirements. Refer to Drawing No. 4 . ITEM #A-10. SHEET A1. 1: At the access driveways, extent of the asphalt paving (this contract) shall be the concrete approach aprons. The approach apron at S.W. Bonita Road is by a separate permit (Off-site Improvements) . Refer to Drawing No. 6 . END OF THE ADDENDUM ilti Od • .,nNE*.O- 4- Cow OF O (i Carlson Testing, Inc. Construction Inspection & Related Tests Geotcchnical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Phone (503) 684-3460 FAX (503) 684-0954 August 29, 1996 CTI # 96-4855 Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. 14600 S.W. 72nd Avenue - P.O. Box 23279 Portland, OR 97223 Attention: Randall S. Major ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ROGER'S MACHINERY TIGARD, OREGON At the request of David Hickman of David Hickman Associate Architects, we have prepared this letter to provide an alternative method for improvement of subgrade soils beneath the building slab and the planned parking area. As we noted in our foundation investigation, the affected areas contain fairly deep sections of nonstructural fill. In our supplemental investigation report we recommended cement treatment of the soil subgrade for improvement. It is our opinion that if work is performed during the current, dry, summer weather, then cement treatment may not be necessary to adequately prepare the site for winter building construction. We recommend that all grass and topsoil be removed from the parking area and the subgrade be permitted to dry. Proofrolling with a loaded dump truck should be performed to evaluate the condition of the subgrade. CTI should be present to observe the proof roll and identify soft spots. Soft areas should be overexcavated. Removed soils should either be aerated, re-placed and compacted or discarded so that crushed rock may be used for replacement. Once the proofrolling and stabilization of soft areas is complete, the subgrade should be compacted to 92 percent of the modified Proctor (AASHTO T-180) maximum dry density and tested. The fill in the parking lot should be tested after every 2 vertical feet of material placed. We recommend that once the slab subgrade elevation is reached in the building footprint and permitted to dry, proofrolling also be performed in this area. The same methods for stabilization of soft areas should be used beneath the slab. We recommend that 6 inches of I> Special Treated Base (STB), topped with 6 inches of 1 1/2'-0 be placed o""er the compacted subgrade for construction of the working pad. A leveling course and/or vapor barrier may be added prior to pouring the concrete slab. Rogers Machinery CTI # 96-4855 Page 2 of 2 If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, INC. /1(446 pSean arawa , .I. s D. Imbrie, P.E. En•' eering Associa - chnical Engineer cc: David Hickman Associate Architects, PC - David Hickman • II s II * / . 1' 1 i W I1 II I I _.i 11 -xra I .> II 40 1:n M � I III o // . : . I 2I Ss`di ,..r _ . w _ � � _.. ........ __ . tr, .■ . .- ITI 7%'KS Ct NI \ 1.-;‘ ,.., 'W. 6500 U T A A k� 4 2. 1 f 1/ - -----4 Ps- --' - -- - - - - - - - .‘" l'N' X10. , t` o // , m r _.. __. ."---11-4 '' r .... N lA iii JOB NO. 9602 C,417C7Et-1DL1M We! of-1E DAVID HICKMAN 0 DATE: PDX BRANCH. ROO= MACMNZRY CO.. INC. ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS. A.I.A. PC 700 MORIN WINN INLAND OR7K FILESPEC: - TIGARD, OREGON "°""1O`01 07217 "Oi"""' 'NS 110-4102 HYDRANTS TO BE MQDERN ALEL ' A-4E8 • pieseT6 U• ',•'t,3 PART - TWO 2 V2 NST NOSE ONE 4 l/ P �t:4= :, 0 I V2 PENTAGON OPERATING NUT ,OPEN LEFT , COLOR : YELLOW . APPROVED EQUAL ' WATEROUS PAR 6790 or CIAH' MEDALLION 2'-0' BEHIND BACK OF CURB,AND/OR trai BACK OF _ if - 2O'-iii Z 1 a1 : — NO. 910 VALVE BOX TOP V P II O I -i, W/ 6"PVC PIPE 5034 = II 3"OR %3 LESS lad � I..' i MIN. PAVEMENT 5.1ii ij1`.I \ .___:. it w COVER DRAIN ROCK 6"FLG x 3ta' OF ^r^ l WITH TAR RAPER 1 L MJ GV I"' 3/4"-O FORE BACK Tit MIN. r F-`` r 8 `^-- WI I AT.••,i. y Z I 0 4100 / sor„---- . . 01 \\ t1 2 o fall e 1.411:%*taTe..1114-mr = r. ..L.--_ , I . - . i 1 ci ti . ..lc II=I ` 4 1 R 6"MJ x MJ (LENGTH MAIN WITH MJ x 6"FLG TEE SPOOL HOLDING (SEE PLAN FOR MAIN SIZE) 4"x 8"x16" CONCRETE BLOCK L 7 I I/2 YDS OF I1/2"- 3/4" DRAIN ROCK Q STANDARD FIRE HYDRANT DETAIL DETAIL NO. 101 E $ ' 6 O W Z d m W 2 O Q "1 0 u- rig V No• 2 (2f F- 74020I, ITEM -A- 2 7 . OD 13,,..,),�i. ktrr,,,,, I wni� U a �� Z1 Qc � g J . OW i p w >< 11181 ____i CI L , frvi,D„,:,:e4,4,„ or Foo r7A/ fG f :v 'P4bt*t •Mliff%'.fr:t 6" 1\ x 0 w C4 Q� 0 7 f.JICtl //ac'fr :3 lit Fr Z f A L � n 7 p /4 U O w Z d 2 m w 0 < J . wP - A22 it i, I TIA A-i o 11m' . .v, Cdr illA r/:✓ v:5-;G'' G;,6f.i �-- . ' NEW 3S FT 1 �•1 51DEU1ALK 8 SIGN O FENCE B I W RA'1', SEE d IMPROVEM: \\ - BY SEPAR Z r * o PERMIT/GC Q 1 s . \ t _... L „iii. i?k_r-- i , o NC c..),� U t� 1 \___fr... .,,_ 'iI QENCE "EXISTING _ji. TO REMAIP Q > ifs FUTURE I o It WAREHOUSE . :1'III APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FUTURE WAREHOUSE \-1, GRAVEL SURFACE STORAGE' YARD • 2'-3/4' MINUS CRUSHED-ROCK EXISTING I OVER 4'-1 1/7' MINUS - i- • • '• . PROTING CRISNED ROCK O1/ER SUBCsR bE I LANDSGA x• I COMPAGTED.TO439 Pf 1 GENT, . . (BUILDING z AS PER SOILS FNGRJEE7�5 .' (8UIL 5 P O a RECOMENI�ATI®NS_AN1 T+.IE SOILS I o e REPORTS. :-•' . �.41 •• • . .• if � ,may • e:..• • [• �.., CO' •.tee • d A. L• 1 • I -Q t •_• 1 + LAPPSC:APE BY I 2 • + • .4 ' t•EPARAIE PERMIT + + : + + •4 - C.) 4:5 W z a F- N m W 0 < --/ NO. 4- o `` RAP 14DD.1 I, ITEM A-9 7 -‹ rn Q VI 1 BUILDING ± V EXISTING CURB CUT 11' (VER) 205' LINE cg D 2 140' 45'- ' m 8 VPI MINIM S 01d '22' 49' W 410A + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt+ + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + t + + + E'UIU!!IIIPW" -.4...„4„,:...t+ ++++++++4++4+ + + + + .. + 0 + + + + + �++t+++++++tC+ _ } + 4 + 4 i. I++ + + 76 + �, ++ +++ +++ J7d+ + -%- + + + + +++ 1 6 SPACES AT =14-11-. $ '+ 0++14:11 9,1-1' 11 SPACES AT 8,61' + + . + + + + + + + I 7 + + 4- + + + + + + + ++++++++++,f+++++ N . T' OX 0 } + } + + + + + + + + + p 2 ' 70 VI ‘.\'‘ o + + ' +, rn rn � 1 +++ +9.r D ca + 'i z 12 ? -' %� a if • •I �+ + � 0 iiii -k O /[ _ mil -+ + + 4 I .i- .�. •• L1 al t ill X + + + V 0 j 0 m11111 A ral4 + + 1 0 P II t . , w + + +4.+ + +4 0 _ _ JOB NO. 9602 [ Avv�IJ91.J l..l I►.lo. v0E DAVID HICKMAN 0 DATE; pDZ HP H, ROG= MAMMY 00.0 mc. 1 ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS. A.I.A. PC 700 MOAN I444001 WAND 011M 1141111 MO FILESPEC: - TIGARD, OREGON .al,<A1a 00 07217 (1103) -3 P4* C 010-42111 . 1 40' k1 \GRAVEL SURFACE STORAGE YARD lc—BUILDING LINE 2'-3/4' MINUS CRUSHED•R4GK . 21.5' OVER 4'-11/2' MINUS, - I' • CRJ�ED ROCK DYER•5USGR�)E ©uJl� I COMPACTED.TO S9 PE i CENT. • AS PER SOILS rzINEEftS f' . • Mr I RECOMENt,AT-I®N5 AN9 THE SOILS•I I REPORT ;d A .• ••Q• v 20'R a 1 1 a �T�P�� I�• -. z 1 CURB , t • �- + LA I CAPE l)Y Y 2 1 ++++ •+ • �vEAR141E PERI'11T (�E '�• r + I + + - + + + ■ t t * T + +1 4 Q r i E + + + + + ,i ..• t + + t +__I + + + + + + + 4 + - f + + + 4:".• + 4a + + r + + + + T + It + Q r + + + + + 40 + 4 El + + * + + + +L 11' 43' + + 0- + cd + r—,�--� T�Q �, 1tl +4. + + - , I + + + I 15 1 + + • ' `'': '. + + + /�51,N rNO PAg-L.IN.%.-FIRE I.At-t E- +++� + / ?OW f+W/�Y 7-oNE,0g5°la flaw �)FENCE c 8 + y ly 12",( Is'. SiG'- `I FT. A Z Ae,ov6 ;TION .. _ b,R, �' 13..RGie LETTBLS a: Wr';t, - `,, z I FIEL.�. (* 1.9ifi ). ]L! z �_ �FA� pII 2 a + p 0 _ • r 2 i� + o + A • OONPACT-• A CCYPAcr‘ccuPACT COYP�A Ag 11 2 a ��� 7YP 51G�� ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY 1 oNL ' + 4 +'�4JY, 1 4, 1SP5AT8 / 4 + + + 4 .W4. \. L~ • 1 f �� +++++++++++++ ' + + + + + + + + + + ,4 r `+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + 4 + + 4 + + + + + 4 6 . + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + 4-....±...+ + + + 4 + + 4 + + + + +t r + + + + + + + + 47 4 _. + + + + + + + 4 + + + 4 + 4 + + + + + +++++44+4++++444++tfi• 4 + 4 + 4 4 4 + f F 4 + t 4 f 4 + + - / + + 4 4 4 4 4 4+ .+ E•f + + + + 4 + + / + 4 + 4 + + + + + + + 4 + + 4 4 + + V ! O d z N m W J Q O -, p a Pg W& ND. (o 12012- ,6D1) I, rem A-10 of ARe , 1181 r�� DINID HICKMAN �� 14 HICKMAN ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS, PC x • I, y 700 NORTH HAYDEN ISLAND DRIVE SUITE 350 ;LAND,OREGON • PORTLAND,OREGON 97217 �► q, ORle OF ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. 14600 S.W. 72nd Ave. Portland, Oregon 97224 September 27 , 1996 CONSTRUCTION CHANGE DIRECTIVE NO. ONE - to Rogers Machinery Project Manual dated 8/20/96 book No. 1 (BID PACKAGE NO. 1, SITE WORK PACKAGE) . This directive modifies, supplements and clarifies drawings and specifications and is made a part of the construction documents. ARCHITECTURAL A-1. Detail 6/A1-2 : Revise detectable surface treatment at accessibility curb ramp to conform to U.B.C. Section 1103 . 2 . 3 . 1 and 1109 . 16. Drwg. No. 1. A-2 . Sheet Al-1: Add an accessible route from S.W. Bonita Road to the northeast corner of the new Portland Branch Facility. This route includes a curb side sidewalk on the west side of the new access drive and a painted cross walk from this side walk to the building. Accessible routes shall comply with U.B.C. Section 1103 . Drwg. No. 2 . A-3 . Sheet Al-1: Revise the accessible route between the new Portland Branch Facility and the existing Corporate Headquarters. The revised route leads to an existing door without obstructions to accessibility. A future accessible route will be provided between the new Portland Branch Facility and the future warehouse when the future warehouse is built. Accessible routes shall conform to U.B.C. Section 1103 . An accessible parking space will also be included with the future warehouse development. Drwg. No. 2 and Drwg. No. 3 . A-4 . Sheet A1. 1: Changes to the Site Plan; Relocate one accessibility parking space from the north side to the south side of the building and provide an accessible route to the adjacent accessible entrance. Drwg. No. 3 . A-5 . Sheet A1. 2 , General Site Notes: Add Note No. 10; "Accessible routes and accessible parking spaces shall have a maximum running slope of 5% and a maximum cross slope of 2% as per U. B.C. Section 1103 . 2 . 4 . 3 and 1109. 4 . 3 . " A-6. Relocate two accessible parking spaces and curb ramp from near the main entrance to the south end of this parking segment. Drwg. No. 3 . f DIRECTIVE NO. 1 (Continued) A-7. Relocate curb 4 feet east to form grade transition planter at north end of accessible cross walk to existing building (see A-3) . Adjust adjacent parking spaces, respectively. Drwg. No. 3 . A-8. Revise curb and planter at the northeast corner of the new Portland Branch Facility Building. Drwg. No. 2 . A-9. Sheet A1. 1: Revise the S.W. Bonita Road access to conform to the recommendations of Kittelson & Associates, Inc. , memo dated September 19, 1996. Right-in/Right-out signs and striping are by the Public Improvements contract/permit. Refer to Drwg. No. 2. A-10 Cover Sheet: Under 'Building Code Data' change construction type to II-N, fully sprinkled. A-11 Sheet A1. 2, Note No. 9: "Landscape retaining wall shall be comprised of natural on site boulders partially burried into the soil to form a grade change as per Sheet C-1. The contractor shall consult with the project landscape architect on the placement of the boulders. " A-12 Sheet A1.2: Change selected curbs -(wheel stop locations) at the parking lot from Detail 5/A1.2 (Pour-in-place) to Detail 4/A1.2 (extruded) . Total length of respective curbs is 615.33 ft. CIVIL C-1. Sheet Cl: Revise grading at the west end of the new Portland Building Facility. Also revise the grading at the northeast corner of the building. These grade changes are in response to U.B.C. Section 1103 (Accessibility) . Reference Item A-5, this addendum. Drwg. 4 and 5. C-2. Sheet Cl: Add Note; "The contractor shall fill the existing swale as per the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers, Permit Application No. 96-596 including the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, comments dated, 10/2/96" . C-3 . Sheet C3, Detail 4 : Add note; "Discharge pipe from the catch basin shall be ductile iron (P.I. ) , within 12 inches of the finish grade" . C-4. Sheet C-2 : Add Note; "Site water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines by this contract/permit are limited to within 5 feet of the building". Water, sanitary and storm within 5 feet of the building are by separate permit/contract. r DIRECTIVE NO. ONE (Continued) C-5. Sheet C.2: Add note; "Provide clean outs at storm sewer lines at end of lines and at maximum 100 foot intervals as per 1996 Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code Section 1103.4 and 707.4 . C-6. Sheet C2: Add a water pressure reducing valve as per 1996 Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code Section 608. 2 . Locate in a vault near the water meter. ELECTRICAL E-1. Sheet E1.1: Add note; "Transformer shall be installed a minimum of 2 feet from non-combustible walls. " The building is U.B.C. Type III-N, non-combustible. E-2 . Sheet E1.1: Change "4" SCH 40 PVC primary" to "two 5" SCH 40 PVC primary" and add note; "Contractor to verify conduit requirements with local utility company" Contact: Brian Moore of P.G.E. , 590-1351. END OF DIRECTIVE a . , t . DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE: RAISED TRUNCATED DOMES HAVING A DIAMETER OF 0.9 INCH NOMINAL, HEIGHT OF 02 INCH NOMINAL AND A CENTER-TO-CENTER SPACING OF 235 INCHES NOMINAL OR 1/8 INCH TO 1/4 INCH CUT GROOVES 2 INCHES APART ARRANGED SO THEY WILL DRAIN AS PER U.B.C. 1109.16 OR A CODE LISTED ALTERNATE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE OREGON DISABILITIES I COMMISSION. THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SHALL 1 BE APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT AT A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE CONTRACTOR. (ROUGHEN SURFACE AT ACCESSIBILITY \ . RAMPS ONLY,MATCH ADJACENT SIDEWALK TEXTURE AT TRAFFIC ACCESS CURB CUTS). f-I -1 \ MAX. SLOPE 7- _7- \ IT1:O 12 BE RA"P J 7.7_1_ i - - - - .- - - - i_- -\ \ AND ; - ---\FLARES. , - - }- {- - - 7 0 0 1 4,TYP 6'&SLOPE CURB CURS 1/2' ABOVE ASPHALT SLOPE CURB ,TYP,lk 73 Q 6 CURB CUT IDETZILL Al-2 N.T.S. FILE: - . t j° JOB NO. 9602 1 Ca • 5-r. GNP. DAR. NO, I 1 DAVID HICKMAN ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS, A.I.A. PC DATE: P'DZ I�OGII�B ]LACF1Y CO.. INC. goo MOM w0o01 MAC owe wM so FILESPEC: - TIGARD. OREGON pomp°`oe 07217 (103)� IAN (W) -4M 4 0 4 • ,... .� .101111.11=. 2 STRIPING BY SEPARATE 40' FERMI -- 0 (PUBLIC IMPROV£M£NT5). + + + + �\ t +} + + ;;' t+//t� 5161 • 30R + + F .�., � a � \\\ + + + + + + + r Z1 �f + + + 4- + + + + ` SI 1 + j t t t ++ t I ( , EN_ CI -4'117/FWA.diwiii+`ti►\ �\ \►\- `"t111� 1 p I+ 20' �► — < -acv + 10 ;- . 4 R > / !! �1_,/' , r `+f+ ++; + ti �It+ . TURE WALK ►�� \ LC 81 77 }}�+}}-�+}+}}+^ + ., ., _ ,qND C. SPACE I.\ OYPACTK:OYPAY,`TGVHPACT -otrbe *c.i,-crl."P ".. '6,1k- ++ ++ ++++ ++ +++ 1 0 ONLY I ONLY — ONLY OpNJ�L�Y/ Ot + `+ R^ ' '� r— 11 RAM?' �1 + + A A, ■ + + + + + + + r + + Ay TO DTL 6/Al2 + + + + + + + + + + + I R, + ` 14 ti + + + + + + + + + + + j 1AcP�ALT lics . + + + + + + + + + + -r * + + + s + ++ i / 2. — +++++ }+++ ++ ++ \ BUILDING L(NE I O + + + + + + + FOR STRIPING, ` 15'S Z z 4' G }+}}+t+++++t SEE DTL 8/Al2 © Ra IC 0� x + + + + + 10 + + + + + �_ o R g� cs + + \' 2y\- lr A FIRE +� + \ o� slur` t i E.-_:(' ACCESSIBLE © '�� SLABS, ENTRY G11R8 O ,1 P. ING CONSTRUCT e +,. 1 Z S/CONTRACT. OD t t q t t , U 2 + + t q'EW PORTLAND + + ++ + + RANCH F °� CUTY + t * + tt + + +++*+++ +4+++ , ELEVATIONS: +++ F ^ +++50+++ ' 9 LD1NG FINISH FLOOR ELE + r i . il .UPPPER LEVEL = 163.00 FT r + +++*T. ++4+++ I LOWER LEVEL = 141.00' $11(11,T#'P. ++ +++1r Z w iij oa• of P12-W& 2 I.'1%4' if if - r r ./► .► 1 .' 1 +++ +�+++ +++ FENCE , •+ a►Q + + + + + + + + + � o L ,. • •+++++.d + + t_ + I 12' . I_ ' 8' ° ,,�� '��i1 • t + + # - -•�+ d), CVO + © ♦ + + ut + + © N ER -�)WNEEL STOPS•_+�++ + BIKE RArx '■■ vAULT, SEE ELEC. + + BY SEP. PERMIT -� OUTDOOR OFF! UNITS, PROVIDI ++++ 124' 16' I� . 0 TYPICAL EXPANSION UNITS, APE S. va _- __ - _ 4' 833' !RA JOINT. BY SEPARATE i v� d'R I■ '.1■ © TYPICAL SCORE PEt�'11IT/CONT� Z . � � ,, T�m■■�m�■ � JOINT Q 1 � ,_ 'R� CENTERLINE OF 4. — IlItlIllhluI �' THE BLDG ENTRY �[ v \�i °� ENTRY DECK V 1 _ ■III ■�i TN-11 • 16 I`li 111111 AND STAIR, SEE ` BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS/CONTRACT. Cp W s i > > <Ie Flu < 111 01 _ RAMP, SEE BUILDING & 0 1 ° © 111 GONSTRIJGTION DOCIa"1ENTS f ti CONTRACT/PERMIT. TM ct) IIM FL - 4 E'i ENTRY 2 g Q _ llotErsis'4. Alm `.;k- 2 B1 ' Rs — 4) \��`\ �� 4.__---- `-ni BY . -PAI Q r 12' II��� _•�► ; PEt�"1 T/C z w in 2 R ---' �,� I ►`` �_ o .– �1/1141PFENCE �j FOR STRIPING, c 2'R ©� ��Orb. �0 --Ni SEE DTL 8/Al2 L� 9 GATE r '0'R 10'R \_�4R 4 sps AT 0bl'•34b1' 9' 6' k 1 (4 20' `I 45� 95' 2 V il, 4` STRIPING SIMILAR :§k TO DETAIL 8/A1-2 P 1 NEW \ 0 m GATE \ % R / 10 + '�! FOR STRIPING, + - SEE DTL 8/Al2 �- — — 1� — +_ �,• • -._ , ` EXISTING FENCE, \ _K TO ,►, REPAIR AND ALTER AS REQUIRED TO ACCEPT 0 , © I. NEW GATE �.: $ i.i p 6 Z : W a =II % i71::t . co o (E) UNOBSTRUCTED o LA- ENTRY of I7RW6 ------,9;-( Velc(01\ i I\\ :K I\ , / / ,...„, 1....11... ... . P. `` 4 ■ ,i_ 1 t O / J 1 \ (NA \ -----"-- ' \ \ .* \ / , 5 --- I 1 \ + , �� / \ / ,- . , 1 \ . 0, I 1 , 1 / '-\ ' / II ` \ I /,1 I i ' '1 i I \ \\kt &? ■ 16 .›S N. c N, 11111.V,. \ i II lk. \ • ,Ate i,,g1 a .1)\k \ N, / Mr ''' V' b.. . ‘,..,.4 c j//////.1' - -'- - - ----- ---;---- �� 120 W -- --" .z.-'411111i 1 _ l___ ___ 16; ? I■ . n.... IS ` ,"; , . \ I 1 \ i 1 1 ilit I s.ri• V „AG)/ t. \c■'- -- A)11 ) 1 1 1\ I \ \t, 1 . 1 1 I . \ , h 1 . /, . ` \ i \ i I i „ i . 1 1 / / -1') , \ \ \ \ \ - v \ si ( (\. lc \ \ \\ \ Et: 1 -i-s-i--------- i ....4* .: t ) „�z. - I . If/ at \ n\\ I i \ , \ \1 • 171; , t i 1 ; 1 \ r 4 ` 1 \ \ 47 JOB NO. 9b02 ( GOkicir C1460 DI R. No DAVID HICKMAN DATE: pDy HRH MACHINERY CO.. INC. ASSOCIATE ARCHITECTS, A.I.A. PC 700 MOM N„4001 WAND DIN[ sup[300 FILESPEC: - TIGARD, OREGON PPM .CO 0731' (003)100-17• FAA (503)201-4302 . — ---- --- - 32' e ri / AT� %I - ■jA T -:--- : '--t• W.-W.' . T / _ -------..__ (K _____ 7),_ ,2:. _ Y--- - 7 • Fs* RAI � �4,fE SW LE: 43.70 / � 7�0 - �s Q 1 iI / yy „ i - Y6.) 1 . - v 1 , I ! v II , ! , 49 -' , IL► ', , J f( . / i- \ '-- \ ''VV\ \—C -\1 / 2 I i . ' /ems _ / ; : ,,,,, �.` `\l2.i�\� O { 1 J R t \ chwoi t\r,t� .„„\t- . ' , b // W 0 \�R1 \ ■ \i\� �L . o � \ _` co '/ r . W / 0 / n g • r ---rif _ ,I k> / / ; :Jr,, q x`7(0 _--, y3:, - / — OW o Sri � � 0 ;d I M'NTs 1 /I 2 z D I P/ /c \ h / , \ ` � \ R i f \ 150 oL 1 o ti \\ '. .'loo � 1 a \ \\ . , !1 t 11 0 / IP I \) \ \ ` ;\ I i � f;' �� 52f'V CH FACILI(Y r�__ \\,\ \\ \\\\\i, / 53----- Iii ,, / \\\\ \\\ \\ 54!\ . % i �. 5 . / \ \\,\ .. . i 1 • f ,""erillIll---- y z . \ , j1 co Q J LI of t74WG S Dear Applicant, Recognizing that being regulated is seldom a welcome or desirable experience, it is our goal to implement our regulatory program in a professional manner and to live up to the Public Service Commitment attached. To assist us, we are asking you to tell us how well we did. You may remain anonymous if you wish. } • Please provide your response bif w,fold this page in half, stapJe.or tape it closed and drop it in the mail. The postage has been prepaid. Thank you for your time. Your effort will help us improve your government. Action ID Number (Optional): Points of Contact (Optional): How did we do? Signature (Optional) • Oiegon October 2, 1996 Daniel Gresham DEPARTMENT or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ENVIRONMENTAL ATTN: CENPP-OP-GP P.O. Box 2946 QUALITY Portland, OR 97208-2946 The Department of Environmental Quality (DEO) has reviewed Corps of Engineers permit application #96-596. Based on the information provided by the applicant, DEO does not anticipate any long term violations of State Water Quality standards, provided the following comments are incorporated into the permit. #96-596 Rogers Machinery. development of office buildino/warehouse and parking, wetland fill of 0.02 acres. tJ/A 1 . ODFW timing and oversight if any off-site impacts to streams or ditches as a result of this project. N/p, 2. Erosion/turbidity controls: turbidity associated with the wetlands drainage channel or downstream flood channel shall not exceed 10% above natural stream turbidities as a result of the project. The turbidity standard can be exceeded for a maximum of 2 hours (limited duration) provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented as applicable, including, but not limited to: a) Place fill with equipment, do not dump; bl Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway, c) Use filter bags, sediment fences, silt curtains, leave strips or berms, or other •• measures sufficient to prevent movement of soil; d) Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event; e) Erosion control measures shall be maintained annually as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness. /A 3. Petroleum products, chemicals, fresh cement, or other deleterious waste materials shall nct be allowed to enter waters of the state, including wetlands; with special attention to sandblasted materials and paint chips IJ/Ar 4. Use only clean fill free of waste and polluted substances to maintain water quality. N/A 5. Spoils, if excavated, shall be placed upland and protected from erosion back into wetlands and waterways. Spoils not to be placed on unstable slopes or a known landslide. Spoils pile to be seeded and protected from erosion. N/A 6 No heavy machinery in waterway. N/4 7. Gravel staging area and construction access. WA 8. Machinery refueling is to occur off site or in a confined designated area •away from all waterways o SW Sixth Avenue Hand, OR 972044390 - . !) 229-5696 (5U )229-6993 • iV VV Vv av• US V i ..! rr Vlrz -•• • N/A 9. Replace any existing vegetation which may be disturbed as a result of this project. Plant disturbed areas with native plants and trees. 10. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance andior erosion. N/A 1 1 . Wetlands adjacent to the construction area are to be flagged or fenced off for protection 12. Storm water from impervious surfaces to wetlands shall be first treated by a storm.vater treatment wetland, biofiltration sv.'ale, or other facility specifically designed to remove stormwater contaminants; and will be annually maintained. Waterways and natural wetlands (including mitigation wetlands) shall not be subjected to untreated storm water. Nbas 13. Submit a spill prevention plan pertaining to construction to DEO (Torn Rosetta). 1,„1/24 14. Projects impacting 5 or more acres require an NPDES 1200C storm water permit, 15. DEQ requires site access on day of request. The DEQ hereby certifies that this project complies with the Clean Water Act and state water quaiity standards, if the above conditions are made a part of the Federal permit. The applicant shall notify the DEQ of any change in the ownership, scope, or construction methods of the project subsequent to certification. If you have any questions, please contact Tom Rosetta (229-5845). �Siincerely, li\k Pte. Michael Downs Administrator Water Quality Division T:TR.certgres.r2 cc• Bill Parks, ODSL (Salem) Bob Baumgartner, DEQ-NWRO Paul Keirnan, DEQ-NWRO Applicant(s)_Agent/Contractor(s) LE-co w/Tort Ro 'PTA ON Io/2./44, . ITEMcj MARKED N/A' ARE Not APP1.r4R,L-a YO "1H� rRo)E.T T. P12EMoQE • . . 4f Oregon /9,9, • August 21, 1996 James Kirkmire DIVISION OF Rogers Machinery 14600 SW 72nd STATE LAND ` Tigard OR 97224 STATE LAND BOARD JOHN A. KITZHABER Governor RE : State File No . 11877 PHIL KEISLING Ball Creek -- Fill Project Secretary of State JIM HILL State Treasurer 775 Summer Street NE Dear Mr . Kirkmire: Salem,OR 97310-1337 (503) 378-3805 We have received your application for placement of fill FAx (550303) 378-4844 material within a ditch created from an upland source . TTY (503) 378-4615 Please disregard the letter sent to you on August 7 , 1996 . The Division of State Lands does not have jurisdiction over your activity, therefore a state permit is not required. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and local planning department before beginning construction. Please contact me if you have any questions . Sincerely, William L. Parks Natural Resource Coordinator rf24 : 97 c : Dan Gresham, U.S . Army Corps of Engineers David Hickman Associates City of Tigard C • • • October 2, 1996 Daniel Gresham DEPARTMENT OF U.S. Army Corps of Engineers LI:\%IIOVVTL)\TA;. ATTN: CENPP-OP-GP P.O. Box 2946 QUALITY Portland, OR 97208-2946 The Department of Environmental Quality (DEO) has reviewed Corps of Engineers permit application #l96-596. Based on the information provided by the applicant, DEQ does not anticipate any long term violations of State Water Quality standards, provided the following comments are incorporated into the permit. #96-596 Rogers. Machinery: development of office building/warehouse and oarkino, wetland fill of 0.02 acres. IV 1.. ODFW timing and oversight if any off-site impacts to streams or ditches as a result of this project. N/A, 2. Erosion/turbidity controls: turbidity associated with the wetlands drainage channel or downstream flood channel shall not exceed 10% above natural stream turbidities.as a result of the project. The turbidity standard can be exceeded for a maximum of 2 hour's (limited duration) provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented as applicable, including, but not limited to:. a) Place fill with equipment, do not dump; b) Prevent all construction materials and debris from entering waterway; cl Use filter bags, sediment fences, silt curtains, leave strips or berms, or other •• measures sufficient to prevent movement of soil; d) Use impervious materials to cover stockpiles when unattended or during rain event; e) Erosion control measures shall be maintained annually as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness. INVA 3. Petroleum products, chemicals, fresh cement, or other deleterious waste materials shall nct be allowed to enter waters of the state, including wetlands; with special attention to sandblasted materials and paint chips. WA, 4. Use only clean fill free of waste and polluted substances to maintain water quality. N/g 5. Spoils, if excavated, shall be placed upland and protected from erosion back into wetlands and waterways. Spoils not to be placed on unstable slopes or a known landslide. Spoils pile to be seeded and protected from erosion. N/A 6. No heavy machinery in waterway. N/a 7. Gravel staging area and construction access. • J Jr. NSA, 8. Machinery refueling is to occur off site or ih a confined designated area away from all waterway: - SW Sixth Avenue • eland, OR 97204-1390; 1) 229-5696 (503)229-&993 1V• VV. Cal iV V,J y J..V v1..7 a•••.•.• �' N/A 9. Replace any existing vegetation which may be disturbed as a result of this project. Plant disturbed areas with native plants and trees. 10. Fence off planted areas to protect from disturbance and/or erosion. N//s. 11 . Wetlands adjacent to the construction area are to be flagged or fenced off for protection. 12. Storm water from impervious surfaces to wetlands shall be first treated by a stormr;ater treatment wetland, biofiltration sv.'ale, or other facility specifically designed to remove stormwater contaminants; and will be annually maintained. Waterways and natural wetlands (including mitigation wetlands) shall not be subjected to untreated storm water. WAN 13. Submit a spill prevention plan pertaining to construction to DEO (Torn Rosetta). N/A 14. Projects impacting 5 or more acres require an NPDES 1200C storm water permit. 15. DEQ requires site access on day of request. The DEQ hereby certifies that this project complies with the Clean Water Act and state water quaky standards, if the above conditions are made a part of the Federal permit. The applicant shall notify the DEQ of any change in the ownership, scope, or construction methods of the project subsequent to certification. If you have any questions, please contact Tom Rosetta (229-5845). Sincerely, Michael Downs Administrator Water Quality Division T:TR.certgres.r2 cc: Bill Parks, ODSL (Salem) Bob Baumgartner, DEQ-NWRO Paul Keirnan, DEQ-NWRO Applicant(s)_ Authorized Agent/Contractor(s) 'Tat-E-69 4 TDN1 Ro4t:T?A ON ,4 ITEMS MAR.K5D N7,44' 4' ARE Ho-f Yo 7Ht� rgo)E .1' T. PRE M.oRE IN I/ TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE J FIRE PREVENTION 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O.Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076 . (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538 /,1k-a R •6,SGT October 8, 1996 Trent Premore, Architect David Hickman Associate Architects 700 North Hayden Island Drive, Suite 350 Portland, Oregon 97217 Re: Rogers Machinery Co. SW 72nd Ave & SW Bonita Rd Tigard File No. 96-0018 TVF&R File No. 1055-96 Dear Mr. Premore: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code(UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. Items noted in memo dated September 23, 1996, under fax cover sheet dated October 8, 1996, are acceptable along with required fire flow calculations. Please find attached a stamped copy of the fire flow calculations returned to you. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469 referring to the above noted file number. Sincerely, ene :irchill, D Plans Examiner GB:kw Enc. cc: Tigard Building Dept. Tigard Planning Dept. ✓ "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives OCT 18 '96 12:55 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.1/28 D E A A F A C S I M I L E M E M O date: OCTOBER 18, 1996 to: MARK ROBERTS ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF TIGARD froth: TRENT PREHORE ARCHITECT copy: subject: PORTLAND BRANCH, ROGERS MACHINERY CO. INC Total number of pages: 28 original to follow (yes/no) : YES . Delivered by: This transmission is for the exclusive use of the specified Recipient. If problems occur in receiving this transmission or it received in error, please phone 1-503-285-2256. NARRATIVE RESPONSE TO THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, CASE NUMBER SDR 96-0018. PLEASE NOTE, THE SITE WORK PERMIT IS APPROVED BY THE CITY SUBJECT TO THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PUBLIC WORK CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE INTO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. THE OWNER IS ANXIOUS TO BEGIN WORK. d a v i d h i c k m a n a s s o c i a t e a r c h i t e c t s 700 north hoyden island drive, portland, oreqon l-503-285--2256 fax: 1-503-285-4362 file no:DHAAFAX page 1 OCT 1B '96 12:57 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.5/28 ITEM 14: AN ACCESSIBILITY WALK WILL CONNECT THE LowER LEVEL /1,02.e ENTRANCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO S.W. BONITA ROAD AT THE NEW STREET ACCESS. IQ (A5 AN INTERCONNECTING WALKWAY WILL CONNECT THE FUTURE 5 WAREHOUSE WITH THE PROPOSED BUILDING AT THIS ACCESSIBILITY WALK WHEN THE FUTURE BUILDING IS BUILT_ BECAUSE OF GRADE PROBLEMS ON THE SITE, DAVE SCOTT OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, HAS DETERMINED THIS WALKWAY SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS or SECTION 1103 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. REFER TO CCD NO. 1, ITEMS A-2 & A-3. ITEM 15: ACCESSIBILITY PARKING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE RESOLVED J DURING THE SITE WORK PERMIT PROCESS. FUTURE PARKING AS REQUIRED BY THE FUTURE WAREHOUSE BUILDING WILL BE PROVIDED DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS FOR THAT RESPEC'T'IVE BUILDING. AN ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBILITY PARKING SPACE WILL BE PROVIDED NEAR THE ENTRANCE TO THAT BUILDING. REFER TO THE 'SITE WORK PERMIT' CCD No. 1, ITEMS A-3, A-4, A-5 & A-6. 4Qj ITEM 16: BUILDING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOCATED ON GRADE AND WILL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPING. THIS WILL BE Ufa A s ADDRESSED DURING THE 'BUILDING PACKAGE' PERMIT PROCESS WHEN THE MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BUILDING WILL BE DETERMINED. I/i 1 ITEM 17 & 18: THE FUTURE WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TIGARD DEvET,O?MENT CODES. PARKING SPACES, ACCESSIBILITY SPACES, BICYCLE RACK, SETBACKS, BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS, OFF-STREET LOADING, AND ETC. SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITH THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED IN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. SDR 96-0018, THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD ZONING ORDINANCES SHALL BE FOLLOWED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUTURE WAREHOUSE. il ee) ITEM 19: THE SIGHT OBSCURING FENCE AT THE CORNER OF S.W. BONITA ,gyp ROAD AND S.W. SEQOUTA PARKWAY SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MEET flaw THE VISION CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. THE 'SITE WORK' PERMIT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, ADDENDUM NO. ONE, ITEM A-9 ADDRESSES THIS ISSUE. ITEM 20: THE FRANCHISE HAULER ('PRIDE' DISPOSAL') HAS REVIEWED j 41---11 SQ THE 'TRASH AND RECYCLING PROCESSES FOR THE PROPOSED C DEVELOPMENT AND HAS NO EXCEPTIONS. A MEMO/PLANS ARE C) SIGNED-OFF BY 'PRIDE DISPOSAL' AND ATTACHED. THIS CONCLUDES THE RESPONSE TO THE 'CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL' FOR THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. d a v i d h i c k m a n a s s o c i a t e arch i t e c t s 700 north Hayden island drive, portland, oregon 1-503--285-2256 I fax; 1-503-285-4362 file no:60209242 page 4 of 4 OCT 18 '96 12:56 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.2/28 D H A A M E M O date: SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 to: MARK ROBERTS ASSOCIATE PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMEN'T DEPARTMENT CITY OF TIGARD from: TRENT PR.EHORE ARCHITECT copy: BRIAN RAGER, CITY OF TIGARD Subject: PORTLAND BRANCH, ROGERS MACHINERY CO. , INC. REGARDING: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, CASE NUMBER SDR 96-0018. THE FOLLOWING IS A RESPONSE TO THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PREPARED BY MARK ROBERTS ON SEPTEMBER 11 1996. THE ITEM NUMBER RELATES TO THE 'CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL' ITEM LIST (1 THRU 20) . THE LIST OF 'CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL' IS ATTACHED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. ITEM 1, 2 & 3: THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED BY THIS PROJECT: A) IMPROVEMENTS TO S.W. BONITA ROAD AS REQUIRED BY KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RELATING TO THE PROPOSED SITE ACCESS TO S.W. BONITA ROAD_ REFER TO ITEM NUMBER 4. B) PROVIDE A NEW 40 FOOT WIDE ACCESS TO S.W. BONITA REFER TO ITEM NUMBER 4. C) RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CURB RADIUS AND RELATED SIDEWALK AND CURBCUT AT S.W. BONITA ROAD AND S.W. SEQOUTA PARKWAY. THIS WORK WILL INCLUDE ALTERATIONS TO THE PAVING AND UTILITIES AS REQUIRED FOR A FINISHED IMPROVEMENT. D) PROVIDE SIX FOOT SIDEWALKS ALONG S.W. BONITA ROAD AND ALONG S.W. 72nd AVENUE. E) PROVIDE WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC UTILITIES. THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE EXCLUSIVE OP ALL ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND SHALL BE ENGINEERED BY BERRY/NORDLING ENGINEERS IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD. THE `PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS' WILL ADDITIONALLY INCLUDE: page 1 of 4 OCT 1B '96 12:56 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.3/28 ITEM 1,2 &3: (CONT.) a) AN ITEMIZED CONSTRUCTION COST FOR 'PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS' . b) AN 'IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT' AND A 'PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS' PERMIT FEE EXECUTED BY THE CORPORATE PRESIDENT OF ROGERS MACHINERY CO. , INC. c) ROGERS MACHINERY CO. , INC. SHALL ENTER A 'DEVELOPER-ENGINEER AGREEMENT' FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION 01 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT WORK. d) ROGERS MACHINERY Co., INC. SHALL PROVIDE A 100 PERCENT PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FORM OF A PERFORMANCE BOND AS PER THE CITY OF TIGARD REQUIREMENTS. e) ROGERS MACHINERY CO., INC. SHALL PROVIDE A 'RIGHT- OF -WAY' DEDICATION FOR THE NEW RADIUS CURB, SEE ITEM NO. 5. f) ROGERS MACHINERY CO., INC SHALL PROVIDE AN EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALKS, SEE ITEM NO. 7. ITEM 4: THE ACCESS TO S.W. BONITA ROAD SHALL BE A RIGHT- IN/RIGHT-OUT ONLY ACCESS AS DESIGNED BY KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (REFER TO ITEM 1, 2, & 3) SHALL INCLUDE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING A RAISED MEDIAN STRIP TO PREVENT LEFT TURNS IN AND OUT of THE SITE. THE COMPLETE APPROVAL AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF 'KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ' ARE ATTACHED. REFER TO ITEM 1, 2 & 3 FOR RELATED COMMENTS. ITEM 5: A RICHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) DEDICATION TO THE CITY SHALL BE MADE BY ROGERS MACHINERY CO. , INC. TO ALLOW FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CURB RADIUS INCLUDING THE CURB RADIUS SIDEWALK AND ACCESSIBILITY CURB CUT. THIS DEDICATION SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PERMIT PROCESS. REFER TO ITEM 1, 2 & 3 FOR RELATED COMMENTS. ITEM 6: THE EXISTING CURB RADIUS AT THE CORNER OF S.W. BONITA ROAD AND S.W. SEQOUTA PARKWAY SHALL BE REBUILT To A 40 FOOT CURB RADIUS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. AN ACCESSIBILITY CURB CUT, RESPECTIVE SIDEWALK AND ALL NECESSARY RELATED IMPROVEMENTS TO PAVING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS. REFER TO ITEM 1,2 & 3 AND ITEM 5 FOR RELATED COMMENTS. page 2 of 4 OCT 18 '96 12:56 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.4/28 ITEM 7: A 6 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG S.W. BONITA ROAD SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PERMIT. ALSO, A 6 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG S.W. 72nd AVENUE FROM THE INTERSECTION WITH S.W. BONITA ROAD SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET TO THE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE TO THIS PROJECT, SHALL ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PERMIT. ROGERS MACHINERY Co. , INC. SHALL PROVIDE AN EASEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR THAT PORTION OF THE SIDEWALKS THAT EXTENDS OVER THE PROPERTY LINE ON TO ROGERS PROPERTY. REFER TO ITEM 1, 2 & 3 FOR RELATED COMMENTS. ITEM 8: CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC WATER LINES AND OTHER PUBLIC UTILITY LINES SHALL BE SHOWN AND INCLUDED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PERMIT. REFER TO ITEM 1,2 & 3 (E) FOR RELATED COMMENTS. ITEM 9: THE CORP OF ENGINEERS HAS NO EXCEPTIONS TO FILLING THE EXISTING SWALE. A COPY OF THE CORP OF ENGINEERS 'PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 96-596; PROVISIONAL NATIONWIDE PERMIT' AND A COPY OF THE DIVISION OF STATE LANDS EXCLUSION OF THEIR INVOLVEMENT, ARE ATTACHED TO THE 'SITE WORK' CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. THIS ISSUE IS ADDRESSED IN THE 'SITE WORK PACKAGE' CONSTRUCTION CHANGE DIRECTIVE (CCD) NO. 1, ITEM C-2. ITEM 10: THE SWALE IS AN ABANDONED MAN MADE DRAINAGE DITCH THAT IS NO LONGER USED AS A STORM WATER DRAINAGE WAY. THE OREGON STATE DEPARTMENT Or' ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY RECOGNIZED THE LACK OF FLOW IN THE SWALE AND APPROVED THE FILLING OF THE SWALE (THE D.E.Q. APPROVAL IS ATTACHED TO THE FILL PERMIT) . A LETTER FROM BERRY/NORDLING ENGINEERS ADDRESSES THIS ISSUE AND IS ATTACHED. REFER TO CCD NO. 1, ITEM C-2. ITEM 11: THE DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE WATER QUALITY FACILITY WILL BE INCLUDED WITH THE 'SITE WORK' PERMIT CURRENTLY BEING REVIEW BY THE CITY. A MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE WATER QUALITY FACILITY IS ATTACHED_ ITEM 12: AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, SHEET ECl, WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE 'SITE WORK' PERMIT CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED BY THE CITY. ITEM 13: ROGERS MACHINERY CO. , INC. , WILL PROVIDE A JOINT ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE TWO TAX LOTS. page 3 of 4 OCT 16 '96 12:58 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.6/28 • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING S.W.ALUtH.SUIT LU I PGI;TLAND,OR 97206 • (5Q3)228-023O • FAX(605)27541$69 September 19, 1996 Project#:2089 Trent Premore David Hickman Associate Architects 700 N.Hayden Island Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97217 RE: Roger's Machinery Access Right-In/Right-out Analysis Dear Mr.Premore: In response to the City of Tigard's request,Kittelson&. Associates,Inc. has completed its review of the proposed right-in/right-out acxe» driveway for the Roger's Machinery expansion on SW Bonita Road. Kittelson & Associates has determined in order for die driveway to effectively function as a rie,ht-ir1/right-out driveway an 1g"raised median should be constructed on SW Bonita in the vicinity of the driveway. A raised median will allow for improved traffic operations on SW Bonita Road while allowing access and egress from the proposed expansion. Presently, SW Bonita has three 12-foot lanes within a 36 foot cross section between Sequoia Parkway and SW 72nd Avenue. With the construction of an 18"median,the eastbound through lane and the eastbound left-turn lone will be reduced to I I foot lanes. eleven foot travel lanes are not uncommon in urban areas and should not hinder traffic operations along SW Bonita near the site. A raised median will provide a physical barrier preventing left-turns at the site driveway which will allow the traffic operations to continue to operate efficiently along SW Bonita Road. The raised median should extend far enough west of the proposed driveway location to prevent a vehicle from "'sneaking" around the median and into the site from the westbound lane. Attached is a sketch illustrating the preferred median length and location. I trust that this letter adequately addresses the concerns involving the right-in/right-out access driveway raised by the City of Tigard. Please feel free to call if there are any concerns or questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, KITTELSON& ASSOCIATES,INC. David E.Clark Engineering Associate cc° Brian Lager,City of Tigard FILE NaM1;'H:'YKLl)F1LELO089lAIGHT.LTR REPEgCSICE 6DN0l1'Id►J No. 4, OCT 18 '96 12:58 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P. 7;29 CALCULATION/DESIGN RECORD Kitts!son & Associates, Inc. TranipoRation Planning/Tralllo Engineering DATE PFO SECT s 7Q>nS sic SW Alcor,s it,700 PoAtand OR A7405 E-mail:aplrana;(5 3)221i•5Q3O Fix:(So3)27841184 PADJECT NYME 1...)n t+ S E- kalppxoaporLrGroD-cam ECT sr DtC, SHED'S ( OF / N A. oM-.3L- i?qd3L" tJ r p1-) ® 3b"I3oy I •.:1.4 (p R3-5g - ! oHt4 211 36" li ip.. 4 ..57-051 bo• 0 ..e" . .4.,e. V %.‘ Q( N htx-X1-5-."_ — f N. ? ,�traT r`� 36'.36 R5-J . x ,r C : ]" 6. Q See. 4:444.J)�J S+r 17d1 Irel 5/1e OM-3L n"J2t„ 4L I �9 , I -, „, ...-7, I _ OD N aD O CO Iv . a. 10 ISLANDS ■T.7<a.•Ia►11o•r CONCRETE TRAFFIC SEPARATOR -k • Oar/17a. pro,Ir 147fMa MN cram OLIO 1f.per r`, Wad 44 sr W.au all del r Owl .4001r.....1114-1.Q "HI Barth 71 -'1 VA. _ a • t h Z Srha of-. r4,F:=:_. :' ��.5'''.`1': 91f`c..�I Pcwunl ' 11 aat•nr.r \L_ _'� .Tt'r!�Q1lni:n,• +A;_:,,M1,r:.. 3 \lJ[ lo.ono•h an t• ' - jS1 la.tmw.l f' li'-Y Far matt mr 1. r� -1-49414 a<rr 1•dWrr•1 aosow7 11r'rs• -P9• !4 R01•MOtA17A9t1 - a.Sr.a ¢•trio rho_4 444c..d fECI1C0 a•a ��----/ eri 11011/4 N 444.- t I YT f�ta•• %.,.... b s le /IPI• lQ/a4 F 1–a�M,1 NOLNTaOLE ,�, �S•.Q-n S� !. 1>•<�, •tlw tr cv.nat 1111--------1111 SS'F 1»Ird 1—F TYPE A Y J� -}-• �;�..'tL..l a _F-j. 7' it {all.,►f �"141/--+1 r-1-6" ,.. /ewe OotT.t111T1 4114141 M/1ih11A1 IlOo <letl14 aW?[• - terir N: SECT.CH B'8 SE•:710A B-3 S£C710N B-1f _ .'•.. y�•r:•' TYPE A TYPE B TYPE C VI 140 I.1I fOeMn1.=� 1..• r - ••.•{1'•'m. 1RYEl KMEnla 04,1`.C,tl'K.IY/f. T1N71c lf'•MiI:A Ow 1%f4 I,C.h•i. •want 1001414:11C0 MA M.P . �' a In mire4*Atm,.Nin p/tlul R �tw o1.Na remYN Gar 1wa+d.9 vlh r•Iw T111'w•.al Q r.-.......e) •JIw 1.4.1001.1 ,ION-tIPUTAhL a011NTABLC 111111 IC.ha1.7 OCa IUll h u l. I. cl W>wcauhs'F'•r'rarwM.taT»tar,en TYPE C 1. 4I..I 4 torn. a OnnA'Iwo v Woo an 1t0w..O pow or 01*Wok (�ur.•sd a•w •vl lr.plr TRANSITION FZ& ISIANO .•Orio%cr OF Oefee.a il.af rd fn si 11wf N 10 TRAFFIC SEPARATOR a 1eon&w1. 00r4 n wrath W31a3 14 m1:31 0.111 Ce Ora<•<tl n 0~14•04.4•40 •d .to al•440 troll,NY1 1r MT14a11 %55141. �yyq 7.4.111 ferN/WI troensIon phut Cr r b 1 r^y- . Oink.yan1 1tw/d b 1C0'11W1.1M� 544 5 -b �+i 1 I '{` •r•Wworm.174 r0,141ch r. Z Bathe'E / r"- T .�_ .l Nof•prMWaO(Ow dog O,•1W1 all lo'kr•M Q 1 �. »:<:+moca '1aa par m•r tl A itlw1ds in tar r'•.•Kr~11 Ott wawa at 0.440 St.1,•f ro•*.t=� °1""t°61.1 81. 7 w $ 4 b b'1 .r4 � � i. late.Wok to .•t.An I.45 >d do!w1 55 r'•a i /1.C.•IP4 L iL Oinr•1•Footman,wt 1405]1tv•cw-t1.s.H f.1"044phwhm sl 1Nn.•:• RV.**da.11 ( I ,QUre. h•4.1.144 t.r0444 1w.wlnl 0-15 nelit d room h curb „•m11r' (l• 1{05..46 bola huh P.C.coma 1•••44.40 `.Y...1 Nr.1 W.ent oroat "Net Y1 m Lt.fh'<m1.11 t4 n v s,A.C.C.coati 1fan•W. Or° PL AW a inr• QI.Cra-N( ..TIKE MOUNTA3LC T wl�2.wr4a/.rsmw WON aa�t<,.dr Cr fl P£ CA i 0 p°.wrS.m•san.r. 14,A a fbh ear .. i- 1Y I.hOlea r�,.1 914 1 ulatrvw-Or Ie.ra/ata-EN OD •144 eta.,to ` I I .l sr•aro r>w41 ' ! e '�I ELCVana 'f APFIC A&PA#IATWI ,--1 IV t 17'.1�Nla a.61"el i r� F�1:' �.[A��/utr17.•917Q��u . all - • -°ar l O W •00[0 rya,1 cri V T7.t i CA Ca lil4IIC IN S..01•16 f1 Oa all 441711/4 PO4I IS1 - ORB.MO.PIMA I 1 CO I— U 0 OCT 16 '96 12:59 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.9/26 _ BERRY-NORDLING 3607 S.W. CORSEIT AVENUE ( ENGINEERS, INC. PORTLAND. OREGON 97201 CIVIL-STRUCTURAL 503-227-7783/FAX 227-7784 • October 17, 1996 David Hickman Associate Architects 700 N. Hayden Island Dr., Suite 350 Portland, OR 97217 Re: Rogers Machinery Storm water flow in the existing swalc Dear Dave: To the hest of my knowledge, storm water no longer flows in the existing swale. The existing storm water pipe at the upstream end of the swale is now almost completely plugged and it is my understanding that this line was abandoned some time ago. On several occasions I have observed some ground water seepage into the swale how the existing pipe end. The seepage can be seen at the sides of the pipe. The water probably travels along the pipe in the rock backfill material. Subsurface footing drains will intercept and adequately handle any current seepage amount in this existing swale. Sincerely, V_ Robert Wells, P.E VRW_trnm lZ���FZE:NGI! CONDtT IaN NO, to OCT 18 '96 12:59 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P. 10/28 STORM WATER QUALITY CONTROL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN Rogers Machinery Co. I. FACILITY DESCRIPTION The stone water quality facility is a vegetated biofiltration swale that collects and filters storm water run-off from the parking lot and roof drains of the developed site. Waver from a storm water quality storm event enters the swale at a water diversion structure. Water in excess of this amount is directed to the existing public storm water system. Water exiting the swale is collected and discharged to the public storm water system. II_ FACILITY MAINTENANCE A. Sedimentation removal. Inspect the swale for sedimentation build up. Remove sedimentation from the swale when it builds to four inches deep in any location, Use flat bottom shovels or other equipment that will minimize damage to the vegetation. Remove sediment in the summer months when possible. Dispose of sediment at a proper disposal site. B. Vegetation maintenance Mow the grass and maintain a minimum height of six inches. Remove and dispose of all grass clippings from the swale. Establish new vegetation in areas that become bare or unhealthy. C. Remove litter,branches and leaves, rocks and other debris that accumulate in the swale. III. MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE A. General inspection. Inspect the facilities a minimum of three times a year and after any large rain storm. Immediately perform any maintenance required in FACILITY MAINTENANCE. B. Mowing. Mow the swale grass twice in the summer or as required for appearance. Maintain minimum grass height as indicated in FACILITY MAINTENANCE. R�FER�u�E GoNVrr �N r-�a• l� OCT 18 '96 13:00 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.11i28 04/16/96 14:45 3 626 6170 PTiIur DISpac L U01lpU# tS-1$756. 43:i4? P1O +Ek5 IttCfliI RY 1$: !G 6VAE'9 RIC/'D03 Rogers Machinery Company, lit. / A k _ __FacsLm11s h:nsmittsy _ 1 r/8 1( J -0F "FNKNV ►WMp 1W r 11?"L ca rr� _ -- 5� fi394� PfelDe- f?' ,4=f 4 Te-g, mLn.oP (5 03) 639.1 44 ( ) 1 0 aE_Tr,e.W. (2d6) 7631187 (206) 761.2530 o euryc:&c.‘ (707) 442-1086 (TOT) 443-6388 GC,papAua.w& 7&8980 ' 13601 736-955$ • / 0■mcgla.uva (5t9) 922-6$10 I (5O9) 921.0586 /Ale- M L ay.ro (2066 4634100 (208) 463-1S00 CC: SUBJECT ,tea) /3G-4 t DiL ( JJtJ :>*PJ' Lv ArioN I. Mg A-01 t}� peve telaoy, /4i2 RA( 721 , .e PPS el Ai s inn TILE s t A u ?VI ovst-'! r. 1�'-�i nJ'Sri f 4.)/c.L ge-,4d4/1,3 JP 7 A' ,Frm,T.a ,s R�t. '- �'fr 2 i FAD •��rJ"el�lrEia �jr�/� .6.e4if f .1 /d Mee, r.-,J S A A b /I7,U?-k rat" "r".,(f C/,p L`` 776 fly P 41..4-rZ. Pecie-4- &x',J 5A-17410J C ' q -t 6' - `4 ,D F f1t�y cgsrA f}.�ilrf Cote' /f 4 , s� y ` �,a,G, .� fA !-r( J4 .i 1>e"5/2'.0,3 SC A - o i`t r 7.4f6 i2)t,rl7 s TEL iegritagist),Ce' L. Y. t Acy �� Co. - P. rERE CE Gors101-1 IoN Nt; ,. tj ra- /fry;el.,i-.1-r IT1s14 j 1� S �+G per'^, OCT 18 '96 13:00 DAVID UICKMAN ARCH. • P.12/28 09/16i96 tt:t6 i $25 (17$ PRIDE LIJ?OWAL 0ooaioDt 0918-48 0371411 TR01a „4ERS YAC1INERY ; 6rA17y P 02/CC3 1r4 'Si lag it DOWI>D MNCW ARCH. P-213. r - 4....*_*..:'::. LL v.... 1 Qi%114.Iiiii ? t ; : ; / i . . i• 1.... , �A•, ::, t r tkk .•j., • + -,. , . . _ . . •, •i •..+ • '? 10 ro " r r + ` `t'•'!• 1 � (f �•�„• Y\� (0 • •+•~.•• . • •-4-•„;,--- , 4,t-.-: .. II:-TIFR.——— '.. 1-51,. .... ...hi i. . • I ,::,: ..t. . 1:1 1 t ' .-tial Cil t .. r • I!q n , • `' � • •11 _ii •• Y ,rl Y 71 ..+ ' ti- a. • i 4 . + 1 f 1 tali lis • i .4'4, L0 . r' 4.1•14144i + '•r `,• i �, 1 'r i .4111111111 .....� — • • i ♦ r ., y _ � r • . . • - v . � ..,...0...,,,,_-_-.-4 + + • • • r - e D Oki 34 141'LI 461 1 pcnirnme aim no i k.67 ?a& 1)11:‘ 241-+7'+4, u'rsNarM rau1 h,: S (.4:4, yx�-k (3,;a�. D,13/eu 6. gig,1,01,1e4 h.A.415 C4?1244401.1f 144—.1) OCT 18 '96 13:01 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.13/28 D M A A F A C S I M I L E M E M O date: OCTOBER 8, 1996 to: GENE BURCHILL, FIRE MARSHALL TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE from: TRENT PREKORE ARCHITECT copy: subject: PORTLAND BRANCH, ROGERS MACHINERY CO. , INC. Total number of pages: 8 Original to follow (yes/no) : YES . Delivered by; This transmission is for the exclusive use of the specified Recipient. If problems occur in receiving this transmission or if received in error, please phone 1-503-285-2256. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, CASE NO. 96-0018. RESPONSE TO YOUR REVIEW OF THE ABOVE PROJECT. IF THIS RESPONSE ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES YOUR CONCERNS, PLEASE NOTIFY THE CITY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. d a v i d h i c k m a n a s s o c i a t e a r c h i t e c t s 700 north hoyden island drive, portland, Oregon •503-285-2256 fax: 1-503-285-4362 file no:DHAAFAX page 1 OCT 18 '96 13:01 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P. 14/28 D H A A M E M O date: SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 to: GENE BURCHILL FIRE MARSHALL TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE from: TRENT PREMORE ARCHITECT copy: MARX ROBERTS, CITY OF TIGARD subject: PORTLAND BRANCH, ROGERS MACHINERY CO. , INC. REGARDING: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, CASE NUMBER 96-0018. THE FOLLOWING IS A RESPONSE TO THE T.V.F.R. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 1996. THE ITEM NUMBER RELATES TO THE REVIEW ITEM NUMBER. THE REVIEW TS ATTACHED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. ITEM 9. "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE-TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" SIGN SHALL BE PLACED, AS REQUIRED, AT THE RAMP ON THE FAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. TWO SIGNS AT THE RETAININC WALL SEPARATING THE DOCK AND THE RAMP AND TWO SIGNS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE RAMP (FOUR SIGNS TOTAL) . NO OTHER SIGNS ARE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER, MORE SIGNS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE AS DETERMINED NECESSARY BY T.V.F.R, ITEM 11. T.V.F.R. IS NOT REQUIRING ANY PAINTED CURBS. PAINTED CURBS AND PAINTED "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" SIGNS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE ON A NEED BASES AS DETERMINED BY T.V.F.R. ITEM 12. SEE ITEM 13. ITEM 13. A FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE ADDED AT THE CORNER OF S.W. BONITA ROAD AND S.W. SEQOUIA PARKWAY. ITEM 15. THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT ADDRESSED IN ITEM 13, SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE R.O.W. BEHIND THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON S.W. SEQOUIA PARKWAY. ITEM 16. FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED AS REQUIRED BY T.V.F.R. ITEM 17. FDC CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON THE BUILDINGS. ITEM 18. THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR THE BUILDING IS 2480 GPM WHICH IS LESS THAN THE 3000 GPM MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE. THE CALCULATION WORK SHEET IS ATTACHED. OCT 18 '96 13:01 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.15/28 ITEM 21. ACCESS ROADWAYS AND FIRE HYDRANTS ALREADY SERVE THE SITE AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ITEM 22. A 'KNOX BOX' WILL SE PROVIDED NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE '1'O THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE T.V.F.R. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PLACEMENT AND THE APPLICATION FOR THE 'KNOX BOX' WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AS PART OF THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS., ITEM 24. GATE KEYS WILL BE PROVIDED IN TIIE 'KNOX BOX' PROVIDED AT THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. SEE ITEM 22. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ITEMS NUMBER 9 AND 13 HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE TO THE SITE WORK CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW FOR BUILDING PERMITS (CITY NO. SIT96-0034 AND LP2A NO. 96522.067) . AS DISCUSSED IN OUR MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1996, THE ABOVE RESPONSES SATISFY THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS BY THE TUALATIN FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT. d a v i d h i c k m a n associate architect a 700 north hayden island drive, portland, oregon 1-503-285-3256 fax: 1-503-285-4362 file no:60209241 page 2 of 2 OCT 18 '96 13:02 DAVP' HiCKMAN ARCH. uP. 16i28 /leaven. .re Department 4'/Ss S.W. Griffith Lt. P.O.box OSS Bea Venal] OR 97076(503)526-2469 FAX 526-25211 REQUIRED • RE W WORK SHEET TO BE US ..O WITH FIRE FLOW CALCULATION INSTRUCTIONS Fire Dept Use Only 1) Building Name: e7 M/LG0 Fmz 2) Address: 'y.1V. 12- JC' c W, BDIJ?TA- RDA}Ciry/Co 4 . 3) Type of Structure: (Chock 1 Doi) Date: V141967 O I FR, DFR O D One Hour, III One Hour U IV Heavy Timber, V-Orte Hour R-N, W-N ❑ V-N 4) Total Building Square Footage: 35, /0 >3j Usc the largest aggregate floor arca of all floors inclusive of mezzanines as defined by UBC Section 407 floor aria_ In'Types I and D FR consauction only, the three largest successive floor arras shall be used. 5) Building Fire Flow(DFF); 4000 rJF from UFC Table A-ll:I A-1. (See Fire Flow Calculation Instruction Handout, Pg. 8) b)' a Single Occupancy Hazed: (TIFF)X (Occupancy Factor) = Required Fire Flow(fill in line 8) b Multiple Occupancy Hazard: Occupancy b 12452 occ sq ft 4- 35i/04–bldg sq ft = 20 %BAtt o c panty F I f 0 22 ox sq ft _ 3 ,' o4. bldg sq fi = kO. %BA Occupancy — _ oat sq ft _ bldg set ft = %BA Occupancy –'- occ sq ft i bldg sq ft = %BA 7) Ocacupancy X Factor: 4 O BA X gpm BFF X 1.0 (az fact) _ SOD FFttt Pie % BA X 44-0 gpm BFF X I."37 (ccr fact) =4 l(.0 FF % BA X gpm BFF X (crs fad) FF % BA X_ gpm BFF X (oce fact) = FF (Fill in Line 8) 4TOTAL OCT 18 '96 13:0? DAVID HICKMAN-ARCH,xt P.17/28 Page 2 8) Total Required Fire Flow: 9) Credited Required Fire Flou: (Use only one of lines a, b, or c) a: Multiply Line 8 by 75% for full fire alarm or C=/ Multi 1y Line 8 by 50% for automatic sprinkler protection __ or c. Multiply Line 8 by 25% for central station supervised au:oraatis sprinkler protection _ 10) Available Fire Flowx:_.24& # Round off numbers to neatest whole ft Building Area ### Fire Flow Example: Apartment building with garages Typo V-N construction, aggregate square footage 12,000 square feL Garages 3,500 square feet, aparlmeitt_c 8.500 square feet, BFF = 3,000 gpm. Apartment 8,500 trc sq f t + 12,000 bldg sq ft = 71% BA Garages 3,500 oc sq ft i 12,000 bldg sq ft = 29% BA '71% (RA) X 3,000 gpm (BFF) X 1.0 (occ fac) = 2,130 rpm 29% (BA) X 3,000 gpru (BFF) X 1.1 (ace fac) = 957 gpm Total Required Fire Flow 3087 gpm The required fire flow of this building is grcatcr than 3,000 gpm, therefore, either area separation walls (see Fire Prevention Ordinance Sec. 22 or Fire Row Calculation Instructions, Pg. 3 Sec. 4) complying with UBC Sec. 505(f) would nerd to be installed or one of the automatic sprinkler alternates or central station supervised alarm system (see Fire Prevention Ordinance Sec. 23E or Fire Flow Calculation Instructions, Pg. 7 Sec. 5(e)). One may also upgrade the type of construction. The same applications are true if required fire flow is greater than available fire flow. a_ 1f single occupancy hazard, place answer on Line 8. If multiple occupancy hazard, skip to line 6b. When multiple occupancy hazsrds are housed within a single fire flow area, the building fire flow shall be factored out to the ratios of floor areas housing various occupancies. Each portion of the building fire flow for a given occupancy hazard shall be multiplied by the occupancy tractor and then added together to produce a required fire flow. 2- This information is available from the fire district unless the building is in a newly developed area or new fire mains are to be installed. If the latter is the case, please provide engineered calculations shoving estimated flows for the area. OCT 18 '96 13:03 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.18/28 TABLE )O. A-III-A-1 kIIi1KV1i REQUI_&ED FIRE FLOW AND FLOW DURATION FOX BUILDINGS F'1Rt FLOW Type Type TYPe TYPE: (gallons FLOW I-F.R. I7 One-KR IV-k.T. II-8 Type per DURATION II-F.R.' II1 One-MW V-Onw-HR' III-W' V-N` minute) {hours) , 22,700 12,700 8.200 5,900 3,600 1,540 30,200 17,000 10,900 7,900 4,800 1,750 38,700 21,800 12,800 3,800 6,200 2,000 2 48,300 24,200 17,400 12,600 7,700 2,250 59,000 33,200 21,300 15,400 9,400 2,600 70,900 39.700 25.500 18,400 11,300 2 750 83,700 47,100 30,100 21,800 13,400 3,000 97,700 54,900 35,200 25,900 15,600 3.250 3 112,700 63,400 40,600 29,300 18,000 3,500 228,700 72,400 46,400 33,500 20,600 3,750 �__..._ T 145,900 87,100 52,500 37.900 23,300 4,000 164,200 92,400 59,100 42,700 26,300 4,250 163,400 103,100 66,000 47,700 29,300 4,500 203,700 114,600 73,300 53,000 32,400 4,750 225,200 126.700 61,100 58,600 36,000 5,000 247.700 139,400 89.200 65,400 39,600 5,250 271,200 152,600 97,700 70,60 43.400 5,500 4 295,909 266,300 106,300 77,000 47,400 5,750 Creator Creator 115,800 83,700 51,500 6,000 " 125,500 90,600 55.700 6,250 " 135,500 97,900 60,200 6,500 " 145,800 106,000 64,800 6,750 " 156,700 113.20C 69,600 7.000 " " 167,900 121,300 74,600 7,250 " 179,400 129,600 79.800 7,500 " " 191,400 138,700 46,100 7,750 " Greater Cre.ter Creator 2,000 -8- OCT 18 '96 13133 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. e- P. 19/28 _ 1,1 IN t�2, /, ?'UALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE r^\ FIRE PREVENTION • ..\,.....- , ', ,r/ � 1 1 J<, 4755 S.W.Griffith hive.P.O_got 4755 .Btayurion,OR 97076. (503)5262469 .FAX 524-2.532 &Ht. to � �Ya.rG � C�.�,.^., Date. S 6. D WC Q CC ❑Mc O By F,Ti fl TU Q DU D sti ❑w p KC Jurisdiction File N6rnbcr. �r� ,r,.f ��11-r►1_rrt� ojea Address:�� ?Z e f'' _ Project NatAe J � �----- TVFkR File Ntanber.&Cr-9i-�,(Whenever referring to Mix prnjea plemse include the TvF4.R File Number) T^Project approved Project not approved-Please seldrees hems elm ked below and re-submit plans for ttview acid approval to the: 0 Tlattit Fite Marshal"a Office Q Planning Dept having jurisdictier+for routing to the T VF&R Fire Marshal's Office —Project CGnO4Oaouj g ved iprp subject to correction of items checked below. This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 3994 Edidoae of the Uniform Free Cole(UFC)and these attiring of the Uniform Building Cede(USC)and Uniform Mechanical Code(L'MC)specifically referencing the fire department.and Other local ordinances.revslatlons and guidelines. _ ii [� �1 .t .! tall be Post-ho Fen.Nene 7671 owv -5 va9tce 1- 'r 1 rQAA�— 7112 T'iez.£ 4'14Tj and the re--- • item J n to '- '� way, L I A. _. ' • . 1�� re �j t fit e.x}61 P�r L ) tilts xi Co R)op 17.1111 A 1M1. /1 L. LO r✓tGTlOUtS 't��+m''V1' I i likinS 'iL'is11:� L �oo4 + _ 1r�t-�' � i"` may be a . �fiS- 6 are t) +LI Tlt� t� �1 J �¢t 40.t5 aadwa) muss he provided to a ciry/aotaaty roadway or soon=easement(UP bF rpVat( 11 1,00 4)ptRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD Lt1•v- o n W r(! yeti vQ bane nn tmebstructod'Adds of not Lit than 20 feet(15 feet for not mars tha �1_ 1 . 't Ff0 v(i0 to canes of r.nt.ess zh r3 feet 6 bdtes.(UPC S .902,2.2.1) t 55uQ OF.. ►J k r a 5) U1&FAC AIM12 L t D a APA ITIFC• Flit apparatus acic ft ltit.i 5_ i easily distinguishable from the surrounding ate and is apable of support r bt�; Ca 1 ad)ann 50,800 pounds live load(gross Vehicle weight).(UPC Sec.90221; it Ea(4e-JC Q,y„� Pka a provide doetmtentaulon from a registered enyi veer c 2b- i�d�. - Wig. Please provide documentarian fioie a registered engineer that the finiahcd construction is in Accordance with the approved plans or die requirements of the Fire Cede. 6) 'j$J INt _ 1jjal_rc; The inside turning radius and Dunicic turning radius shall not be lees than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully.as measured Soto the same center point_(UFC Sec.902.2.2.3) 7)DE 4.D1.N's ROADS- l lead ettd fIrc apparatus arras roads 1C excess of 154 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diaquns of approved eurttarounds are ava fable from rb'fere dimict(t MC.Sac.9o2.2.2.4) 3)ERLDCLES• Bridges shall bt designed,laspected and final construction approved by a registered ettgterer_ The bridge she.'be designed it accordance with the Americas Association of Highway and Transportation Officials "Stavtdard Sp.seOcationdop Highway Bridges.- The badge shall be desicied for a live road suffisufficient rn carry SO 000 pounds. (1IPC Sec 9(12.2.2.5) X9)JtiO PARKLKC SIC2tS; Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of su!ficir&width to accommodate parietal vehicles, "'No Parking signs shall he innwled on one or hods aid= of the roadway an' ttort rounds 45 needed. (UFC Sec. 9(12.2 4) Signs shall read"NO PARKING•Filth LANE-TOW A WAY ZONE,ORS 3E.E10"and shall be installed with a clef space above g r o u n d level of 7 t l s e t. Signs strap be 12 inches wide b; l a inches big.%and:ball have Slack or red 1ety re and border oa a white bac g ound.(UFC Sec.901.4.5.(1)(Z)&(3D aaralna"Smoke Dreri it Save Urn Paor I of? OCT 18 '96 13:04 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P. 0i28•� : • xMF1R File Nt esberi.U 54.o 10)GRAn Fire apparanu mass roadway raja tall not mood se avers f, _ de or au'petrsat Mitt a Inuits=rade of 15 percent for krtgths duo more than 20U feet.(UFC Sec 962.226). latcrseccions utitiiiatottads shall be bwl(mausaum 5%) with the exception of aoining for water tern-of[. 12)POINTED CURBS: fir,"par=access roadway eurlss shall be painted yellow had oariced"NO PARKING FER&LAJ4E"at each 25 feat Lettering shall have a stroke of not Fes has Vie ili a wide by six mein {UPC Sc fa 14 51) . 12j CO RCLAt.B4m DINGS_1=6:01d PILrINUR Q • The tainimtt>:s ass bee of fire bydrents for a building shall be based op the nQtlired firs flew prior so giving toy credia for fen protection systems. tees* shall not be less than oat(1)lire hydrant for the fires 2,000 gallons per miauts(GPM)requited 15re flow and one(1)additions]fat bydraat fvi each 1,000 GPM or portion tbetenf over 2000 GPM Fire bydrrwts shall be evenly spaced around tkc bonding azid dine: locatives shall be approved by the Chief.(UFC See.903.42.1) :( 13) No porcine of me exterior of a eammcrLiel building shell be lo.ei.2 RIM than 250 feet Roam a Bra hydrant when mas`°ed is an approved wooer abound the outside of the build:og cad along s:; approved fax appat=ms seem roadway,(UFC Sec.903,4.1.1) 14) • Fir hydrants for sisagk Emily dwelling< and duplexes sra'i be placed at each mtctsotsion. latamrefietr file hydras.%are required it any portion of a structure canto&500 fees from a byd.st as tileasuted in an approved manner mind the outside of the s>'u+awe and along approved fee apparatus 'cues roadaaay:1 Placement of additional foe by ants&ail be as approved by the Chief-(UPC Sec.903.412) Fite Dydrnaa shall Dot be located more than IS feet fruui AL approvcd 6rc tpparatYS Ma=roadway.(UFC Sae.903.414) 16) EDLEJECDRAMLLEAL-DELARThiENI-CantigiM A fir hydrant shat he looted within 70 foci of a fin department eonneraoe(FDC). he hydrants and FDC's shall be looted on the some side of the fire apparatus mess roadway (INC See..903.41.5) FDC loons shall be as approved by the Chief(1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Cede,Sec.904-1.1) ,.l7)$iP I) PA$MMFNT Ct]INraC'TZQNS ON BUILDING$i Firs department connections shall not be located on the building that is being protoctad.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.5) �l$)COMNfrRC1AL BC]TLDIINGS-REOVTFD F1RE jj.L)Wt The required fire flow for me btrilting shall not c:c_rri 3,000 gal loon per minute(GPM)or the available GPM ID the wafer damn,system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the The Marshal's office.(11FC Sac.9033) ,19) -JRRF FLOW; The minutiae,available fire flow foe siugje family dwellings and&plazas shall be 1.000 gafocs pc minute, If the structure(s)are 3,60o square test or larger,the required fire Dow_Loll be determined according to INC Appendix Table A.4134-1.(UFC Appcudsx Ill-A.Scc.5) 20) 2Lea time firs flow for rural buildings shall be calcclatcd m arcordaaca with Noricum'Fire Pro:o ion Acsescierioe Standard 1231. please contact the Firs Marshal's office for special Ise/1n and other rrgniremasD that will apply.(UFC Sec.903.3) 2_21) . 211: ti :ear. . . a : era t i• Approved fire app.-4 access roadways and ire lglrdng wore supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other coat vebon on tl:e tits or subdivision_(tJ['C Sec.5704) X 22)KNQX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required far this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for at application and inaMictions regarding installation and placement. A _.23)RLOU2RED NSF T14NS; Pksse contact the Fire Marshal's office at the appropriate times for Inspection of the following. I Dix La tc. 5. ..— &- Sort f= e;r<re•LS) t-e- ---25) Plea Reviewer Siouan cc; Page 2 or 2 OCT 18 '96 13 04 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.21/2B gyp.tN V,q< ��P n ck,� TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE FIRE PREVENTION �� U , 4755 S.W.Griffith Derive. P.O.Box 4755.Acavcrun�,OR 97076. (503)526-2169 .FAX 526-2535 J 6F&ti£SG October 8. 1996 OCT ;4 X996 Trent Premore,Architect David Hickman Associate Architects 700 North Hayden Island Drive,Suite 350 Portland,Oregon 97217 Re: Rogers Machinery Co. SW 72nd Ave&SW Bonita Rd Tigard File No. 96-0018 T VF&.R File No. 1055.96 Dear Mr.Premore: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code(UEC)and those sections of the Uniform Building Code(IJBC)and Uniform Mechanical Code(UMC)specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. Items noted in memo dated September 23, 1996,under fax cover sheet dated October 8, 1996,are acceptable along with required fire flow calculations. Please find attached a stamped copy of the tire flow calculations returned to you if 1 can be of any further assistance to you,please feel free to contact me at 526-2469 referring to the above noted file number. Sincerely, 4 4 ne t irehill, Plans Examiner GB:kw Enc. cc: Tigard Building Dept. Tigard Planning Dept. "Worbii "Smokc Pacctors S.v Li+c% OCT 18 96• 3:05 DAVID 7-1 ARCH - • aev_ 1U 3',a"4d P 22/28 aoa Boo .Fite DepsI trnent sns l.,r-cir,rsrp A.P.O.IN MS Suannoa.OR 971736 Com S21.2169 FAX 526-23X1 REQUIRED FIRE FLOW WORK mum. t To BE USED wrrn v now CALCULATION INSTRUCI'1oNs Fire Dept Use Only t) Bu ding N:soc: F060.5 41#100y Fla--- I I 2) Address; 5,x1. 1 Ave: ,A.u.Evi Ico 116 D, eXL. 3) That of Structure: (Cbeck 1 Box) Date: V24'./410 --_ D IF .UFR O D Orr Hour.W One Hoer O IV Harry Tiaeber V.Ate ROW II-N.fI N a v-N -. 4) geed a, : OS;10 4 Ust Iisc latgot agprpte ifmr zrat ore*bowl lacfudve of suenaMos as de5ned by UBC S=6011407 Boar sru ZQ Tip zs I and II Fk consauadon only, the truce larse u Yumemve floor axos Ada be trips. 5) Building its plow d7alhoo: 4002 s from UFC Table A-113-A-1.lastructiun Handout.Pe.8) 6)' a Susg1a O0000arcy Bantd (MP)X (0cm/wry Parlor) = Required Fire Mow(fill in line 8) Muliipbs Ououpabcy Hama Y� LA-- 7t/S-1. ooc sq R 35e/a4-bldg sq - ?O%11A1f • Orinency F 71 1 4 4 2 a z r sq t E 1 q la l n b a z sq R Ckamisncy — o w 179 f 1 T bld= sq ft % .& err sq R ÷ bldg sq h OOCupuicy X Facing: % SA x 41pQO Lyra$FRY I. (oec Dct) ' _ft..FFFttf % DA lC 40 00 glum BPF z r•3_ (occ hat) -416•D FF % BA X =pm BPF Y (occ fact) PI' % b.A X um BPP X Ow tea) (fel in Lis 8) +4"'3 p • M V M*UH11 UM APPROVED • CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ?K oym.Or POMO 6 MOT Aid APPROVAL, Sal A r7. .li l„r .Yr.•-•-. /I ....♦ nLA .N 11.11 M.11A .11I\JLL�L.1 IVY I ../1U OCT 1B '96 13 05 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH P.23/28 Pi=e 8) Total Rewired Fire no 4'1(,a 4) Crc41rd Loquirrd rim Flow:(Use only one of lino a, b, or c) a. Multiply Urtr f by T9% Cu ftdl fire alarm or M Iy Lint i by SO% for automat sprink)er prote•tion or c. Multiply line S by 25% for antral station supervised automatic sprinkler protoct:oq • 10) Fire Fbw': AR fi' ( O 1 Ruund off numbers m crest whole ft Building Area tit rue flow 1.411140 6: Apattmont Oinking with taros Type V-H construction,aggregare square taw 12,000 squire fetes. Osragce3 SOO square fist, apartments CVO sitars fecL 3FF —3.000 Xpm, Apanmenx 1.300 clef aq ft ;- 12.000 blot sQ fe -7196 9A Gasps 3,SCO eec l4!t : t2,0O12 bb it R = 29¢ A 71% CUA)X 3.0W>9m(OFF)X 1.0(acs he) — 2.130 pm 29% (BA)X 3,000 spm(BFF)X 1,1 (crt fat) = IS7 gp• Total Ragtdtid Fitt Flow alma The required Ere flow of this busIctrsg is treater than 3.420 gpnt,dxztforc,tither azry separation walk(sot Fire Prevention Ordiparse 5r:.22 or Fire Flew Calculation instructions,Pg.3 S>_4)aeasplying with UK S . SOS(t)would need so be installed or one of the selorosac sprinlckr alternates or causal station soptMaed alarm system (see Fire Prevention Oidiinanrz Set:_23E or Fire Pam Cumulation lnctnttions,Pg. 7 Sec, S(e)), One may also upgrade 1bc type of construction. The tame application;its woe if required firs flow if treater than mailable fire flow. 1.if situps occupancy hazard, place answer: on Lino 5. If nultiplc ecouparey hazard. *alp to line SD_ When multiple occupancy halards are housed within a *Ingia fir. lieu area, the building tire flu+ shall km factored out to the ratios of floor .ru•Aa housing various o•re'1iPoncies. lath portion of the building fire flow for a Qivon oci.cupaecy hazard shall be multiplied by the oc:rupancy factor and then added togethrer to produce a required tire flow. This lrforsatso' ire available free the fir• district unless the building is in a newly developed area or • mains are to bo installed. If the latter is the case, l tliAg3afitt;l fleE calculations shoving nstjrsated !loos tosisPrmantEop Ar' CONO4T1ONAL.LY APPROVED D APPROVAL Of - • IS NOT Ali.NpHWAL Of r TS. t3EE ATTAC ,LETTER. .. ... OCT 18 '96 13.06 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. Post-N• yorc 781 c�,� 4 / (•24 8 w 7 + ' eumor2 abc t ca./Arj: W'clCk.c 4 NOTICE OF I P11ocfa Pr.Calt Fa.f _ 4 2_ pax, - SITE DEVELOPMENT RE — ROGERS MACHINERY SECTIQN, j Ap. lCATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: ROGERS J141ACHINERY Site Development Review SDR 96-0018 PROPOSAL; The applicant has requested to develop a 30,025 square foot light industrial building and a 12.000 square foot warehouse. APPLICANT: David Hickman Architects OWNER: Rogers Machinery 700 N. Hayden Island Drive 14800 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, OR 97217 Tigard, OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION' Light Industrial (I•L). ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial(l•L)- LOCATION: The site is located at the south east corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S1 12A0,Tax Lot 00501. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18,70, 18.96, 18-100, 18,102, 18.106. 18,108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and 18-164. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECIS Low SUR 66-0016-ROGERS MACHINERY Paso OCT 18 '96 13:06 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.25/28 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMl7S, THE FOLLOWING CONDITLONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted,to staff contact shall be arian Rager, Engineering Department(503)639-4171:) I. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement are required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the pions are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one(1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements.) Public improvement plans shaft conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the construction documents and financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public lmprovemerts shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the public improvement plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement has been executed. A 100 percent performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee, and a sign installation and or streetlight fee is required. 4. The applicant shall provide the recommended measures, as listed in the letter from Kittetson & Associates, dated June 17, 1996, to enable the proposed access onto Bonita Road to function properly, Specifically: A, The driveway shall have a 50-foot turning radius, a 30-foot curb radius, and have minimum width of 40 feet. B. The driveway shall be located at least 200 feel west of SW Sequoia Parkway. If this spacing is not provided. the driveway will need to be limited to right/in, righttout for alt traffic. C. The applicant shall instal! signs at the driveway to alert truck traffic that left turns are prohibited at this driveway. D The applicant shall re stripe' the existing left turn lane. in Bonita Road to provide for two-way left turns. The applicant shall submit a striping plan prepared and/or approved by Kitteison&Associates_ MOTIcr=oc dtcsSIDN SOR 96-ppt8-ROGERS MMCH1NERY pars 2 OCT 18 '96 13:06 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.26/28 E The final plans for the driveway Iota;ion and design shall be approved by Kittelsun & Associates, Proof of their approval shall be submitted to the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall dedicate additional right-of-way (ROW) at the corner of SW Sequoia Parkway and SW Bonita Road to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius. The ROW dedication shall be parallel with the curb return and provide enough space for the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp 6. The public improvement plans shall include the reconstruction of the curb retLirn at the southwest corner of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway to provide for a 40-foot curb return radius The reconstruction shall also include the sidewalk and wheelchair ramp and any other modifications to existiny utilities or drainage structures 7_ The public improvement plans shall include the construction of a new sidewalk along the frontage of SW Bonita Road. The width of the sidewalk shall be 6 feet. 8. Any connection to public water lines shall be Shown on the proposed public improvement construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department. 9. The applicant shalt submit a copy of the issued Corps of Engineers permit for the filling of the on-site swate area. 10. The applicant shall submit calculations pertaining to the filling of the swale. Specifically, the applicantshall show how and where the storm water that presently flows into the swale will be collected and carried through the site. Staff will need to be assured that the on-site storm system will be adequately sized to handle that water. 11. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No 9147. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuancx of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans end • calculations for review arid approval. 12. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the site improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 13. The properly owner shall either consolidate the legal parcels into one parcel or enter into a joint access and maintenance agreement. 14. • Additional walkways shall be designed from the entrance of the warehouse building to SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway A designated walkway shall be provided between the two new buildings. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts. Planning Division, NOTICE OF DECISION SCR -ROOERS MACKNERT GAGE 3 OCT 18 '96 13:07 DAVID HICKMAN ARCH. P.27/28 15. A rninlmum of one additional handicapped parking space is required to be provided it the warehouse is developed, A minimum of one of the handicapped parking spaces is required to be van accessible. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts. Planning Division. 16. The applicant shall provide a screening plan for roof top or other mechanical equipment, where necessary, based on final design plans. STAFF CONTACT Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 17. Floor plans and building elevations for the proposed warehouse shall be reviewed for compliance with the development standards of the Community Development Code in terms of setbacks, off street parking, building height, off-street loading, etc. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. A minimum of one bicycle rack shall be relocated to the entrance of the proposed warehouse building. STAY CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 19. The applicant shall revise the plan so that the site obscuring fencing is not located within the Clear Vision Area at the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW Sequoia Parkway. 20. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the franchise hauler concerning the design and locatioe of the proposed trash and recycling enclosures. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. IN ADOITION,T11E APPLICANT SHOULD-8E AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF-,THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE UST . . SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement 1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City,the Applicant (subdivider) shall. A. Execute and tile an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed:and B. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. 2 The agreement shell stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. NOTICE OF ht['.ftil[SN SCR 96. $-ROC FIZ RrncroNERY PAGE 4 D H A A F A C S I M I L E M E M O date: OCTOBER 21, 1996 to: DAVID SCOTT BUILDING OFFICIAL CITY OF TIGARD from: TRENT PREMORE ARCHITECT copy: MARK ROBERTS, BRIAN RAGER subject: PORTLAND BRANCH, ROGERS MACHINERY CO. INC. Total number of pages: 7 Original to follow (yes/no) : YES . Delivered by: This transmission is for the exclusive use of the specified Recipient. If problems occur in receiving this transmission or if received in error, please phone 1-503-285-2256 . SIDEWALK EASEMENT ALONG S.W. 72 nd AVENUE AND S.W. BONITA ROAD. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AT THE CORNER OF S.W.BONITA ROAD AND S.W. SEQUOIA PARKWAY. S.D. DEACON CORP. CONTRACTORS LICENCE. d a v i d h i c k m a n a s s o c i a t e a r c h i t e c t s 700 north hayden island drive, portland, oregon 1-503-285-2256 fax: 1-503-285-4362 file no:DHAAFAX page 1 Exhibit 'A' Sidewalk Easement Description Being a public easement for sidewalk purposes in the northeast one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, located in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the initial point of the Plat of Pacific Corporate Center, thence along the west right-of-way line of S.W. Sequoia Parkway, being 40 feet from centerline, N 01°13'16" E 431.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing N 01°13'16" E 30.33 feet to a point 25.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of S.W. Bonita Road; thence parallel with said centerline N 89°24'01" W 435.47 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 45.00 feet and a long chord bearing S 45°59'24" W a distance of 63.20 feet; thence 70.07 feet along said curve through a central angle of 89°13'10" to a point on the east right-of-way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue 25.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of said S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence parallel with said centerline S 01°22'49" W 173.13 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way line S 88°37'11" E 5.00 feet; thence N 01°22'49" E 173.13 feet; thence S 88°37'11" E 1.50 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 38.50 feet and a long chord bearing N 45°59'24" E 54.08 feet; thence 59.95 feet along said curve through a central angle of 89°13'10"; thence N 00°35'59" E 1.50 feet to a point 30.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of said S.W. Bonita Road; thence parallel with said centerline S 89°24'01" E 262.22 feet; thence S 51°07'36" E 13.47 feet; thence N 52°31'36" E 8.66 feet to a point 8.00 feet by perpendicular measure from said south right-of-way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence parallel with said centerline S 89°24'01" E 51.73 feet; thence S 51°19'37" E 8.66 feet; thence N 52°19'35" E 13.47 feet to a point 5.00 feet by perpendicular measure from said south right-of-way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence parallel with said centerline S 89°24'01" E 70.10 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 28.50 feet and a long chord of S 29°44'33" E a distance of 29.33 feet; thence 30.80 feet along said curve through a central angle of 61°55'37"; thence S 88°46'44" E 1.50 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 3,934 square feet more or less. 1547 IDI- WAL - ASEVENT NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON \__NO0'35.59"E 8.00' 6.50' 1.50' I INSET "B" S89'24'01"E 51.73' S51'07'36"E S88'37'11"E 13.47' 1.50' N52'31'36"E 551'19'37"E N52'19'35"E 8.66' 8.66' 13.47' = 89'13'10" 45.00' INSET "A" 70.07' = S45'59'24"W 63.20' S . W. BO\ TA ROAD N 89' 24'01" W i435.47' 25' S89'24'01"E / M SEE 262.22' 70.10' \ o SEE S89'24'01"E 1 INSET "B" 5.00' INSET "A" I III I "2 A = 89'13'10" A = 61'55'37" P.O.B. D A . LR = 59.95' R = 28.50' w CH = N45'59'24"E L = 30.80' g 54,08' CH = S29'44'33"E 29.33' O, CV '- > C`1 M / CN d 0 ^ ;. n( N Z d I o S88'46'44"E ;� Q I o 1.50' d O Z 7. S88'3 7'11"E Q N 5.00' 0 I SCALE 1" = 100' 2 'f— _° 5 -PO Of oLil f) Z ( ) I P.O.C. --\ (f) Exhibit 'A' Right-of-Way Dedication Being a tract of land in the northeast one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, located in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the initial point of the Plat of Pacific Corporate Center, thence along the west right-of-way line of S.W. Sequoia Parkway, being 40 feet from centerline, N 01°13'16" E 431.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing N 01°13'16" E 30.33 feet to a point 25.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of S.W. Bonita Road; thence parallel with said centerline N 89°24'01" W 30.33 feet to a point of cusp, said point also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 30.00 feet and a long chord bearing S 44°05'22" E a distance of 42.66 feet; thence 47.45 feet along said curve through a central angle of 90°37'16" to the Point of Beginning. Containing 198 square feet more or less. 1547Ieg1 RIGHT — OE — WAY DEDICATIO \ NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON S. W. BO\ ITA ROAD S 89'24'01" E 25 30.33' Q o � 0 = 90'37'16" I R = 30.00' P.0.8. N� LL_I L = 47.45' CH = S44'05'22"E 42.66' I 0 n a / = w N ( ) (\ o I I z SCALE 1" = 100' Z (./) ( ) 40' - I P.O.C. • 1 •4 / • USTATE. OF.OREGÔ.N CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS' BOARD REGISTRATION:."CERTIFICATE .'a _ This:�ertities'thatthe rson named ` -, ,� ` . • _• • pe n m hereon ~ ' • „; registered d as:provided by law as a ,• • •• ' - . ' ..A1' .1.::� •; 4 :. -at. ' � ,..:*!%1; .- % eF• •��,, s.. .r.....:it t! • n. t�° •µl �y � '•l'�,«�r�.:.aa�R• i -, EN`CotzTPFA« S•RUCTUR ES - •Rtegistradion �� •4, L `f... •›... .CVa`.a'i (- NON EX $PT •• .. = Number: [:_;'031138 •; `=. . �,: r . CO1PARAT201*, `:= , .,. F • ,:: •� a.. . ,•--1 kr`3= 5$1996 ."is° ......;+'' h,� :� +,<< , . . ° 't 2103!,9 -,. �' 1111 c):.. y Pig' .� • , - 1 r •l` yam }.. 4.,_::.,,,.......1...� :�: : `� t `: ! •s-r.i-'�<t 1) .,Sb,`;QEI COPT ,CORP f,... r =Qz :;r•• _ Y f' .+ > • i PO:iii2 .`.-.23392 t 7 a. �$' ��` w *�:'. ' , " • fT40'a9?298000 ' • . -.;':..f...` :A':' -.' • , -'' *--':`,.:-. . .... .,,,., 1 tip, �. ... , . . ....;2 , c 4 _SIGNATURE OF REGISTRANT ;: ' fc41 4*C=t).=i1 _p( c: SC=t D=4,C==4)O41 ?4:===t3 • • ■ ...--•"'"*.-...-:// es3" 6)**0 • ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC . 144)?k, f37 14600 S.W. 72nd Ave. Portland, Oregon 97224 Phone: 503/639-6151 Fax: 503/639-1844 To: City of Tigard Date : 13-Feb-97 Attn: Mark Roberts Ph: 639-4171 Fx: 684-7297 Re z J7A i.nt Accssp and Maintenances Agretxma1iG From: Chris McKillop This agreement covers a variety of contingencies . On page two we promise to create easements if we convey either parcel . We have not granted an easement at this time for the following reason . An easement, by definition, creates rights between different landowners. An easement terminates by merger when the holder of either dominant or servient estate acquires the other. Therefore Rogers Machinery Company cannot have an easement in its own land. If you have any questions about this please call . Very truly yours, Chris McKillop Corporate Counsel OSB no. 92001 CSB no. 138299 cc : Mr . James D. Kirkmire, President cm02137b.doc l'00/100d L6ZL1.89 01 Z# RIHNIRDVW SHDNI WOH NIdO5 : i0 L6-8I—ZO RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Corporation F i l e No. NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT JOINT ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY ON ADJOINING PARCELS COMMERCIAL USE THIS AGREEMENT, created this third clay of October, 3996 by Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. . WITNESSETH WIIE12EAS, Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. is the owner in fee simple of the following described adjoining properties in the City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon, to wit: Parcel R1298456 which begins at a point at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 west, Willamette Meridian, thence South 246.7 feet to a point; thence East a distance of 528 feet to the west line of Lot 4 , Bonita Gardens; thence North along the west line of said Lot 4 , a distance of 246. 7 feet to the north line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 12 ; thence West a distance of 528 feet along said line to the point of beginning. Parcel R1233855 which begins at a point on the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12 , Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, which is 246 . 7 feet south of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 12 ; thence South a distance of 226.98 feet to the north line of the Samack, Inc. tract as described in Deed nook 584 , Page 402 ; thence East along the north line of the Samack tract a distance of 528 feet to the west line of Lot 4 , Bonita Gardens; thence North along the west line of said Lot 4 , a t00/ZOOd Z6ZL1789 0,1 4 PIHNIHOVW IHdO9 IO Z6-0j-ZO • distance of 226 .9b feet; thence West a distances of 528 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. desires to improve the above parcels and allow the occupants of each parcel the right to use the parking lots, driveways and entries which are existing and/or to be constructed along and upon a portion of both of the parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City of Tigard's grant of permits allowing improvements upon the aforementioned lots, FIRST: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. agrees to allow the occupants of both parcels mutual access and use of approved parking areas, driveways, and accesses on each parcel (for the purposes of parking and related maintenance) so long as Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. owns both parcels. The right to such mutual access and use is not to exceed the minimum number of parking spaces required by the City of Tigard's ordinances in effect on October 3 , 1996. SECOND: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. agrecy to be responsible for maintenance of the parking areas, driveways and access points for both parcels so long as it owns both. • THIRD: In the event that Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. sells or in any other way conveys its interests in parcel R1233855, it agrees to grant a perpetual easement in parcel R1233855 which inures to the benefit of the owner of parcel R1298456 for motor vehicle driveway, parking and related maintenance purposes, as limited in Paragraph one above. FOURTH: In the event that Rogers Machinery company, Inc. sells or in any other way conveys its interests in parcel R1298456, it agree to grant a perpetual easement in parcel R1298456 which inures to the benefit of the owner of parcel R1233855 for motor vehicle driveway, parking and related maintenance purposes, as limited in paragraph one above. FIFTH: Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. declares that it will grant perpetual appurtenant easements to any parties to whom it conveys its interest in the abovedescribed lots; these easements, if required, will allow rise in common of the above described motor vehicle driveways, parking lots and access points, including that portion thereof situated on the property of the other party for ingress and egress of motor vehicles, pedestrians, parking and uses incidental to these lawful uses of the property. The easements created under this paragraph will include the following provisions: A. This easement should bind and inure to the benefit of, as the circumstance may require, not only the immediate parties thereto, but also to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, and successors in interest as well . X00/OOOd L6Z089 OI AaHNIHDVW SdH00H W08H IHdC5 : 10 L641-.N B. The maintenan�:e shall be a shared respon.bility of the respective owners of the above parcels and each owner shall share the cost of maintaining the easement. C. Each of the owners of the respective properties shall maintain liability insurance policies which, at a minimum, meet the standard in the industry for the particular types of uses for which the properties are used. The insurance policies shall name the owner of the adjoining parcel as an additional insures in connection with the use of the easement. SIXTH: In construing the foregoing agr..pement, the plural shall mean and include the singular whenever the context so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this 3rd day of October , 1996 111A'4 Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. James Kirkmlre 14600 S.W. 72nd Avenue President Portland, Oregon 97224 OFFICIAL AEAL ' , T''3 ANN I.DAVIDSON NOTARY PUBUC.OREOON •;I COMMISSION N0,06 ;4'1'l1'1'1; OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY05,*000 COUNTY OF WASHINGTON This instrument was acknowledged before me on October 3 , 1996 by James D. Kirkmire as President of Rollers Machinery Company, Tnn . Ann B. Davidson Notary Public - State of Oregon My commission expires on May 5, 2000 . • 1700/1700d L6Z099 01 Z# DiaNIETIW Sdd00H WOE NdC : 10 L6-Ci-ZU • M I'LLER N - S H Miller,Wash,wiener; py Heger&Carlson U P • 3500 U.S.Bancorp Tower MUST.HASH.WIENER.HAGER&GRLSEN UP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 111 S.W.Fifth Avenue Portland.OR 97204-3699 Phillip E. Grillo (503)224-5858 grillo @millnash.com (503)224-0155 fax (503) 205-2311 direct line 4400 Two Union Square 601 Union Street Seattle. 98101-2352 August 1, 1997 (2o6)622-9484 (206)622--485 tax Mr. Dale M. Hermann Hearings Officer Hermann & Company Suite 271 25-6 N.W. 23rd Place Portland, Oregon 97210 Subject: Rebuttal of Rogers Machinery Company, Inc.iSDA I 6d'1 Case File 97-164-Appeal Dear Mr. Hermann: At the hearing concerning the above-entitled matter on July 17, 1997, you kept the written record open until August 1, 1997, in order for the parties to submit their written rebuttal to the new material submitted by opposing parties. On behalf of Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. ("Rogers"), we are submitting our overall response to the four documents listed below: 1. Scott King's memorandum dated July 17, 1997; 2. City of Tigard's staff report; 3. Memorandum from Loretta S. Skurdahl, senior assistant county counsel, Washington County, dated July 10, 1997; and 4. Memorandum from Jim Oliver, Tigard city attorney's office, dated July 9, 1997. • MILLER NASH MILLER,NASH,WIENER.HAGER A CARLSBI LYP A T T O IL N I P S AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 2 - August 1, 1997 REBUTTAL OF ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. 1. THE CITY/COUNTY'S TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE ("TIF") IS A FEE. NOT A TAX. a. Fee language is used extensively in the ordinance, in its supporting documents, and in the staff report. There are a variety of examples in which the county, city, and its staff refer to the charge imposed under the TIF ordinance as a fee. First, the title of the ordinance is "traffic impact fee." Second, the word "fee" appears 12 times in the first three pages of the ordinance. Third, the personnel at the city and county who administer the ordinance never use "tax" language, but always use "fee" language. For example, the worksheet for calculating the fee, which is attachment 4 of the staff report, uses only the word "fee." The TIF calculation instructions, attachment 8 of the staff report, also follow the same pattern. Finally, even the title page of the staff report refers to this revenue-generating measure as a "fee assessment," not a tax. b. In any event, the city/county's characterization of its TIF ordinance is not dispositive. In Automobile Club v. State of Oregon, 314 Or 479, 488, 840 P2d 674 (1992), the court noted that the character of such a charge was to be determined by its function and not by any labels given by government. 314 Or at 493. See also Dennehy v. Dept. of Rev., 305 Or 595, 756 P2d 13 (1988). Therefore, county counsel's assertion that the charge must be a tax because the TIF ordinance defines "traffic impact fee" as a "tax" does not comport with Oregon law. Furthermore, it is important to understand that prior to 1990, the TIF was defined as a fee. The "tax" language was added in 1990 and placed on the ballot for voters with a "fee" title. Buried in the definition was the "tax" language. Furthermore, this ordinance operated as a "fee"-based system prior to 1990 under the same basic mechanisms as are now in place. Did this fee get converted to a tax by magically changing its definition? Whatever the motivations were for changing this language, it did nothing, as a matter of law, to change the substance of what is really a systems development charge fee imposed pursuant to ORS 223.297 et seq. Finally, it should be noted that in a recent California case, Sinclair Paint v. Board of Equalization, 937 P2d 1350 (Cal 1997), the California Supreme Court engaged in an extensive (post-Ehrlich v. City of Culver City, 911 P2d 429 (Cal 1996), and post-Ballot M I LLER NASH MILLER.NASH.WIENER.HAGER&CARLSEN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 3 - August 1, 1997 Measure 13) discussion of the tax/fee distinction. In Sinclair, the court distinguished between three general categories of charges and discussed whether each type was, as a matter of law, a fee or a tax. The three categories the court identified were: (1) special assessments based on the value of benefits conferred on property; (2) development fees, exacted in return for permits or other governmental privileges; and (3) regulatory fees, imposed under the police power (the court noted that these three categories may overlap in a particular case but considered them separately for analytic purposes). Focusing on the regulatory fee type, the court found that this type of charge should be characterized as a fee rather than a tax if it does ""not exceed the reasonable cost of providing services necessary to the activity for which the fee is charged and which are not levied for unrelated revenue purposes."" Sinclair, 937 P2d at 1355 (quoting Pennell v. City of San Jose, 721 P2d 1111, 1118 (Cal 1986) (quoting Mills v. County of Trinity, 166 Cal Rptr 674, 676 (Ct App 1980))). After finding that the assessment at issue was a fee, not a tax, the court went on to hold that: "Sinclair will have the opportunity to try to show that * * * the amount of the fees bore no reasonable relationship to the social or economic `burdens' its operations generated." 937 P2d at 1358-59. This holding is remarkably similar to the underlying holding in Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 US 374, 114 S Ct 2309, 129 L Ed 2d 304 (1994), and its extension to fee cases in Ehrlich. The California Supreme Court logic in Sinclair is precisely the same logic that Rogers is using in the case at hand. The city should not be insulated from carrying its "rough proportionality" burden under Dolan simply because the county characterized the system development charge ("SDC")/TIF charge as a tax rather than as a fee. Clearly the TIF is a fee, designed to offset perceived future (extra-capacity) roadway needs. As a constitutional matter, such a fee must have a reasonable relationship to the impacts caused by the proposed activity. Under Dolan, "rough proportionality" must be based on an "individualized determination," not a generalized determination. MILLER NASH MILLER,NASH.WIENER.HAGER&CARLSEN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 4 - August 1, 1997 c. This TIF meets the statutory definition of an SDC. Pursuant to ORS 223.299(4)(a), "system development charge" means "a reimbursement fee, an improvement fee or a combination thereof assessed or collected at the time of increased usage of a capital improvement or issuance of a development permit, building permit or connection to the capital improvement." Furthermore, ORS 223.299(4)(b) provides that: "`System development charge' does not include any fees assessed or collected as part of a local improvement district or a charge in lieu of a local improvement district assessment, or the cost of complying with requirements or conditions imposed upon a land use decision, expedited land division or limited land use decision." As noted in Section 3.17.020 of the TIF ordinance, the purposes of the charge are as follows: "A. This tax is adopted to ensure that new development contributes to extra-capacity transportation improvements needed to accommodate additional traffic generated by such development. "B. This tax shall provide funds for extra-capacity improvements to county and city arteriole and certain collector or state facilities. It applies throughout the county, including within incorporated cities." Clearly, the city and county, through the TIF ordinance, have devised a revenue-generating system that is assessed or collected at the time of increased usage of a capital improvement or issuance of a development permit, building permit, or connection to the capital improvement, for the purpose of funding extra-capacity transportation improvements. Therefore, the purpose and scope of the county's traffic impact fee ordinance fall squarely within the statutory definition of an SDC, pursuant to ORS 223.299. d. By statute, all SDCs are fees. Pursuant to ORS 223.299(2), the SDC statute defines the term "improvement fee" as "a fee for costs associated with capital improvements to be constructed." Therefore, since "system development charge" includes an improvement fee, which is defined by statute MILLER NASH MILLER.NASH.WIENER.HAGER&CARLSEN UP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 5 - August 1, 1997 as a fee for costs associated with capital improvements to be constructed follows that all SDCs are fees, not taxes. e. The purpose of ORS 223.297 is to create a statewide "uniform framework for the imposition of [SDCs1 by governmental units for specified purposes and to establish that the charges may be used only for capital improvements." The above-mentioned state statute governing SDC schemes demonstrates that the legislature intended to provide a "uniform framework" for the imposition of SDCs by all governmental units for specified purposes and that those fees could be used only for capital improvement projects. Therefore, the legislature has clearly stated that a "uniform" system for imposing SDCs is a matter of statewide concern. f. Any attempt by the city/county to impose its TIF/SDC ordinance in a manner that conflicts with the uniform framework established by ORS 223.297 would be preempted by the statute, pursuant to LaGrande/Astoria v. PERB, 281 Or 137, 576 P2d 1204, reh'g granted, opinion amplified, 284 Or 173, 586 P2d 765 (1978). It is a well-established rule that state laws of general applicability will supersede conflicting local laws on the same subject, unless such local enactments involve the local government's ability to determine its own form of government. LaGrande/Astoria, 281 Or at 156. The plain language in ORS 223.297 indicates that the state has asserted a statewide substantive, economic, and procedural objective for uniformity regarding SDCs that will prevail over any conflicting (i.e., nonuniform) local enactments on the same subject. g. Because ORS 223.297 et seq provides for a fee-based system rather than a tax-based system to finance extra-capacity capital improvements for streets, any attempt by the city/county to finance its T1F/SDC system through a tax-based system conflicts with the unified statewide statutory scheme and would be preempted. As noted above, ORS 223.297 et seq clearly provides that SDCs are fees, not taxes, and that improvement fees and reimbursement fees (or some combination thereof) are the only financing mechanisms available in this state that can be used to fund SDCs. Furthermore, since the purpose of the SDC statute is to provide a uniform statewide framework for the imposition of SDCs, any attempt by the city/county to fund its SDC system through a tax that is not uniform statewide directly conflicts with the statutory scheme and would be preempted. MILLER NASH MILLER.NASH.WIENER.HAGER 8 CARLSEN LLP A T T O R N R Y• AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 6 - August 1, 1997 2. THE COUNTY'S TIF IS AN EXACTION SUBJECT TO DOLAN'S HEIGHTENED CONSTITUTIONAL SCRUTINY. a. Oregon cases have expanded the reach of Dolan beyond exaction cases requiring the dedication of real property. The city attorney mistakenly asserts that "takings" analysis applies only to the "facial taking of property through physical occupation by the government." In a series of Oregon cases, decided after Dolan, Oregon courts have clearly held that Dolan's heightened scrutiny analysis applies to conditions and other requirements of approval that "do not require a dedication or transfer of a property interest to the public or the body from which the developmental approval is sought." Clark v. City of Albany, 137 Or App 293, 299, 904 P2d 185 (1995); see also J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Clackamas County, 131 Or App 615, 887 P2d 360 (1994); Art Piculell Group v. Clackamas County, 142 Or App 327, 922 P2d 1227 (1996). b. Ehrlich and its progeny have extended Dolan's reach to fee cases. In 1996, the California Supreme Court, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, held in Ehrlich, 911 P2d 429, that the requirements of Dolan applied to a "recreational mitigation fee" that was quasi judicially imposed by the city. The United States Supreme Court upheld the concept of a fee, but rejected the method of calculation employed by the city, and sent the matter back to the city to recalculate the fee. It is interesting to note another case in the state of California, namely, Rohn v. City of Visalia, 263 Cal Rptr 319 (Ct App 1989). In that case, the court found that the dedication requirement for a road widening, imposed as a condition to a permit, was invalid because the traffic impacts of the project (none, according to the administrative record) did not justify the condition. The reason this case is interesting, in light of Ehrlich and the three Oregon cases cited above, is that the city planners in each of these cases identified a nni for more roads. This need by itself, however, did not alter the constitutional duty the city had to justify the imposition of a condition of approval on a particular development to widen such roads. In other words, Rohn and the other cases cited demonstrate the constitutional problem that arises when a local government focuses on its need for improvements, rather than on the impacts that flow directly from the proposed project. If the impacts from the proposed project are zero, the local government's need for such improvements is irrelevant with regard to Dolan's constitutional standard. Such is the case here. Rogers does not contest the city and county's need for road improvements, but rather questions why a project with no impact • MI LEER I NASH MILLER.NASN,WIENER.HAGER 8 CARLSEN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 7 - August 1, 1997 should be forced to contribute toward a preexisting need that is not exacerbated by the development. c. Commentators have explained the reasons why Dolan's standard of heightened scnitiny should be applied to preset fee cases such as this one. A recent law review article notes: "Particular types of exaction schemes, even if sincere efforts to offset development impacts, might also be at risk under Dolan. Most apparent would be pre-set standards that do not provide for an individual assessment of development impact, such as where any development would be required to automatically pay a fee or dedicate a portion of land. Such pre-set standards would fail to meet Dolan's requirement for an individualized assessment of development impact." Mark W. Cordes, Legal Limits on Development Exactions: Responding to Nolan and Dolan, 15 N Ill U L Rev 513, 551 (1995). The author goes on to say that: "To the extent that the impact fee is designed to assess a particular development's contribution to a community need and then to assess a fair fee for its share, impact fees would seem quite compatible with Dolan. This is not to say that impact fees automatically meet the Dolan test; clearly fees that are arbitrarily assigned with no effort to quantify actual impacts would be invalid." 15 N Ill U L Rev at 553 (emphasis added). • d. The city's reliance on preset fees based on unsubstantiated average trip generation data violates Dolan's requirement for an individualized determination of rough proportionality. The city/county's TIF/SDC ordinance presets certain fees depending on the generic land use category a particular development is classified under by the local review body. Once the use determination is made under the ordinance, a seemingly arbitrary number is assigned to that land use indicating the trip generation rate. Although the city and county have suggested that the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual ("ITE Trip Generation Manual") "may be useful" in understanding the basis for this arbitrary number assigned by the county, there is in fact no evidence in the record demonstrating the basis and reliability of the number used by the county for trip generation purposes in this I LLER NAS H MILLER NASH.WIENER.HAGER&CARLSEN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW • Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 8 - August 1, 1997 case. Therefore, the city's reliance on preset fees and arbitrary trip generation assumptions violates Dolan's individualized determination of rough proportionality. e. Consideration of "potential," "speculative," or "worst-case" impacts of Rogers' development violates Dolan's "rough proportionality" test." Oregon courts have stated that, for purposes of Dolan's rough proportionality test, the "potential" impact of development on a particular site cannot be used as a basis for exactions. Schultz v. City of Grants Pass, 131 Or App 220, 884 P2d 569 (1994). In Schultz, the court cautioned that the city should refrain from imagining a "worst-case scenario," by assuming that the applicant, at some undefined point in the future, might use its property to its full development potential and then, on the basis of that scenario, calculate the impacts of the development and tailor conditions to address those "potential" impacts. In this case, the city and county have engaged in precisely the same speculation that the court in Schultz declared to be improper. Mr. King's memorandum is filled with phrases that plainly indicate that the county is fearful that the new building might, at some unidentified time in the future, generate new trips. For example, in his memorandum, Mr. King states: "The study should be based on the traffic generating capability, not the idiosyncrasies of the applicant." (King memorandum at 2 (emphasis added).) "There is nothing insuring that this expansion will not result in the hiring of more employees * * * or more business." (King memorandum at 2 (emphasis added).) "The market could change or the facility could be sold." (King memorandum at 2 (emphasis added).) "Either could result in the facility being used in a manner that would generate trips consistent with the average trip rate for a General Light Industrial use." (King memorandum at 3 (emphasis added).) M I LEER NAS H • MILLER.NASH,WIENER,HAGER 8 CARLSEN LLP A T T O R M E T A AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 9 - August 1, 1997 3. LEGISLATIVE ENACTMENT OF THE TIF/SDC ORDINANCE DOES NOT INSULATE IT FROM DOLAN'S HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY. a. Dolan itself involved legislatively enacted exaction requirements. The city and county have argued that because the TIF/SDC ordinance was legislatively enacted, it is somehow insulated from Dolan's heightened scrutiny. The city and county's arguments are based on a misunderstanding of Dolan and a mischaracterization of their own actions. As the Supreme Court noted in Dolan, the presumption to which the city and county refer attaches only when a petitioner challenges the validity of the zoning ordinance or similar legislative enactment. Dolan, 129 L Ed 2d at 320 n.8. In this case, Rogers brings no such challenge. Instead, we are challenging the city's decision to impose a particular dollar amount of TIF in exchange for issuance of an occupancy permit for our building. In other words, we are challenging the city's right to withhold our occupancy permit, unless we pay a fee that has no proportional relationship to the impact caused by our development. The TIF fee in this case is imposed quasi-judicially, not legislatively. It should be pointed out that the same argument concerning legislative deference was made in the Dolan case. The city of Tigard did not prevail in that case, and for the same reasons it should not prevail here. In Dolan, all the exactions imposed by the city of Tigard were based on legislatively enacted requirements found in the city's comprehensive plan and development code. The Dolans, however, did not challenge the constitutionality of the exactions until they were quasi judicially applied in the context of a permit request. The Supreme Court did not provide legislative deference to the city then and would not be likely to do so here. b. For purposes of applying Dolan's heightened scrutiny, Oregon law focuses on the character of the requirement rather than on the manner in which it was enacted. In Schultz, the court looked to the Dolan case and found that: "what triggers the heightened scrutiny of exactions is the fact that they are `not simply a limitation on the use' to which an owner may put his or her property, but rather a requirement that the owner deed portions of the property to the local government. That is precisely the nature of the exaction imposed by the city in this case." 131 Or App at 227 (quoting Dolan, 129 L Ed 2d at 316). There is no dispute in this case that the TIF ordinance is not a limitation on use, but rather is a requirement that the owner give something of value to the local MILLER NASH • MILLER.NASH.WIENER.HAGER 8 CARLSEN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 10 - August 1, 1997 government in return for the issuance of a permit. It is this precise quid pro quo, namely, give value or withhold the permit, that triggers Dolan's heightened scrutiny. c. Pursuant to Section 3. 17.060(A), the TIF/SDC is imposed, and is then due and payable at the time of issuance of a building permit, unless the charge is deferred pursuant to specific provisions in Section 3. 17.060(B). Section 3.17.060(A) provides that: "Unless deferred, the tax imposed is due and payable at the time of issuance of a building permit by the county or city. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no building permit shall be issued for a development subject to this tax unless the tax is first paid in full." In this case the tax/fee has been properly deferred via Section 3.17.060(B) until the issuance of occupancy permits. Therefore, pursuant to the quid pro quo stated above, Dolan's heightened scrutiny should apply because the applicant is required to give value in order to obtain a building/occupancy permit for this development. 4. THE CITY/COUNTY HAS NOT MET ITS BURDEN OF PROOF UNDER DOLAN TO MAKE AN INDIVIDUALIZED DETERMINATION THAT THE REQUIRED EXACTION IS RELATED IN BOTH NATURE AND EXTENT TO THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. a. The ITE Trip Generation Manual has not been expressly adopted by the county to support the city/county's trip generation assumptions, and no other basis for trip generation assumptions used by the city/county exists in the record. There is nothing in the staff report, or the attachments referred to on page 7 of the staff report, that explains the factual basis for the trip generation number used to calculate the TIF in this case. For example, in Jim Oliver's memorandum on behalf of the city, he indicates that: "The calculation of the amount of the TIF assessed against new development is based upon trip rates for the variety of land uses, and those trip rates were gleaned from studies compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Generation Manual." (Emphasis added.) MILLER NASH MILLER,NASH.WIENER,HAGER&CARLSEN LLP A T T O R N i Y• AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 11 - August 1, 1997 Throughout the proceedings, the city and county have been careful to articulate that while the ITE Trip Generation Manual is "helpful," and while the trip generation rates have been "gleaned" from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the manual has never been expressly adopted as a basis for trip generation rates. Unfortunately, without the factual support of the ITE Trip Generation Manual (and all of its limitations), the city and county lack any factual basis for the TIF calculation. b. Even if the hearings officer finds that the ITE Trip Generation Manual serves as a basis for the city/county's assumptions for purposes of applying TIF to Rogers. the ITE assumptions for general light-industrial use are unreliable. The ITE Trip Generation Manual assumptions for general light industrial are unreliable for the following reasons. First, the ITE Trip Generation Manual uses average trip rates rather than actual trip rates. Actual trip rates would require before-and-after traffic studies. Since the purpose of the ITE Trip Generation Manual is to generalize about trip generation patterns for broad categories of land uses, actual before-and-after data is not used. The ITE Trip Generation Manual's use of average rates does not amount to an "individualized determination" for purposes of Dolan. Second, as noted in the material Rogers submitted from the ITE Trip Generation Manual at the hearing, the ITE trip generation average for general light-industrial uses is based on a sample size of only 18 studies. These studies were conducted at facilities in the early 1960s and 1970s and into the mid-1980s, so most of the data is old. At the sites surveyed, the average number of employees was 399, with a range of 45 to 2,260. The average square feet gross floor area of the sample was 329,000, with a range of 21,000 to 2,750,000. This wide variety in data, accompanied by relatively few samples and the age of the studies, makes this data relatively unreliable in this case. Third, the 18 ITE trip generation studies for general light industrial show a wide variation in average trip generation rates, ranging from 1.58 to 16.87. This wide variation in trip generation rates further underscores the studies' limited reliability. MILLER NAS I MILLER.NASN.WIENER.WAGER&CARLSEN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW • Mr. Dale M. Hermann -- 12 - August 1, 1997 c. The stated purpose of the city/county TIF ordinance is to determine the number of new trips generated by the proposed use. but if the ordinance is administered in such a way that the characterization of the use purposely ignores the actual trip generation characteristics of the proposed development, then the implementation of the ordinance runs afoul of Dolan's requirement for an "individualized determination." Rogers fully understands that the United States Supreme Court took an intermediate position in Dolan when it established the "rough proportionality" test. The court did not adopt a "specifically and uniquely attributable" test as had previously been used in some states to measure the degree of connection between an exaction and the impact caused by the development. Nonetheless, in cases like this where a preset fee is administered in such a way so as to completely and purposely ignore uncontested factual data concerning the actual number of new trips to be generated, it cannot be said that an "individualized determination" has taken place. This is particularly true in a case such as this where the city estimates that the proposed development will generate 229 average weekday trips, according to its preset-calculation formula, whereas the data submitted by the applicant, based on verifiable information, indicate that no new trips will be generated. This type of variance does not equate to "rough proportionality." Instead, there is simply no proportional relationship between the proposed exaction and the impact actually caused by the new development. Not only do these facts support the conclusion that Dolan's rough proportionality standard has been violated, but these facts also support the conclusion that the purpose of both the county's TIF ordinance and the state's SDC statute have been violated, since this preset formula is not roughly proportional to the actual number of new trips that will result from this proposed development. d. There is substantial, credible evidence in the record that Rogers'. proposed new building will not generate any new vehicular trips. As pointed out by the testimony of Walt Novak, vice president and production manager of Rogers, the new building is intended to house the company's Portland branch. That building will relieve overcrowding in the existing buildings on site and will help consolidate all Portland branch personnel. No new employees will be added and no new business trips are expected. The situation presented here is not unlike that which exists in some other industrial and office campuses, where the reconfiguration of existing personnel and business occurs by creating a new building on campus to better serve the organizational needs of the company, without increasing the work force or the overall number of trips entering and leaving the campus. There has been no evidence submitted by the city or county in this case that demonstrates that the character of the existing trips would change. As stated by Mr. Novak, the number of truck trips will not change. Furthermore, the type MILLER N iS H MILLER.NASH.WIENER.HAGER&CARLSEN LLP W Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 13 - August 1, 1997 of truck trips coming to the site will not be altered as a result of the reconfiguration of personnel and operations on site made possible by the construction of the new building. CONCLUSION This case presents a special situation that we believe requires careful attention. Rogers has in the past paid, and will continue in the future to pay, its fair share for necessary roadway improvements in the area. Furthermore, Rogers has offered to conduct a before-and-after traffic study in order to determine the actual number of new trips, if any, generated by this new building. In order to demonstrate our good faith, we wish to state again, on the record, that we are prepared to undertake such before-and-after studies and would be willing to pay the general light-industrial rate for any additional trips that the study shows are actually generated by the new building. We believe that this would be the fairest result for everyone involved. We do not believe it would be fair or legal for the city and county to assume that our new building will generate 229 new trips and, as a result, assess Rogers $37,102 in TIF charges. We believe that the state of the existing law and the facts in the record support our position and that our appeal should be granted. If the hearings officer is not inclined to grant the appeal, at the very least the hearings officer should consider apportioning the TIF and reducing it to $34,921 as stated on page 6 of the staff report. As an alternative, Rogers would be willing to perform a before-and-after traffic study in order to determine the actual number of new trips generated by the proposed development. We would be willing to accept the results of that traffic study and would be willing to pay the general light-industrial trip generation rate for any new trips that were found to be generated (if any) by the new development according to the before-and-after study. We believe that the hearings officer could accommodate this result by continuing the case for approximately six months so that actual trip calculations could be made after occupancy occurs. We believe that the hearings officer has authority under Section 3.17.050(B)(2) to make a determination that the use does not have an adequate basis for trip determination as stated in Appendix A and therefore that, at the applicant's expense, actual trip generation rates may be used. Therefore, we believe that the hearings officer has discretion, under the terms of the ordinance and under certain limited situations, to consider actual trip generation and use such data as a basis for MILLER H MILLER.NASH,WIENER NAQER 8 CARLSEN LLP A T T O R N I Y S AT LAW Mr. Dale M. Hermann - 14 - August 1, 1997 determining the appropriate TIF charge. We believe that this would be the fairest result in this case. Otherwise, we would ask that our appeal be granted as stated above. Respectfully submitted this 1st day of August, 1997. II.. e . 4ki, 163 Phillip E. Grillo cc: Mr. Chris McKillop Ms. Loretta Skurdahl (hand-delivered) Mr. Jim Oliver (hand-delivered) Mr. Mark Roberts Mr. Scott King kET• URN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: ` "OF OREGON SS (ITN'HALL-RECORDS DEPARTMENT, G. _.r(y of Washington CITY OF TIGARD I, Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assess- 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Tigard,OR 97223 Clerk for said county,do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records of said / CORPORATION county. rj"1-14-CLI4r=erj* File No 'J �1JR -00/p O Jerry R. Hanson, Director of W Assessment and Taxation, Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 97101534 Rect: 196956 28. 00 EASEMENT 10/29/1997 10: 02: 33am BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WAY ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC . hereinafter called the Grantors. grant and convey unto the City of Tigard a perpetual easement over, across, and under the land and real property described in the attached Exhibit "A" for a bicycle way and pedestrian way, which may be used by pedestrians and non-motorized mechanical means of transportation, such as bicycles and for no other purposes. The Grantee shall have the right to place, construct, operate, replace, maintain, inspect, reconstruct, install necessary improvements, and in connection therewith may remove any trees, shrubs, or brush necessary or convenient to accomplish said purposes. THE TRUE CONSIDERATION for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title, or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the right of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors, their successors,and assigns in the case of such event. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee. its successors, and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I hereunto set my hand on this 3rd day of October , 19 9 7 . ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. Name of Corporation Signature W W. M. Novak 14600 S .W. 72nd Avenue President Address Title Portland, Oregon 97224 Signature Title STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on October 3 , 1997 jdate)by W. M. Novak (name(s)of person(s))as President (type of authority,e.g.,officer,trustee,etc) f Rogers Machinery Co. , Inc. (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). •.Yn—8. !a ti•, OFFICIAL SEAL Notary's Signature :_ '�'•++'' ANN B.DAVIDSON _ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ( 5/5/00 COMMISSION NO.052045 My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 05,2000 tit- �lltttitl1111111'�1'`1'`l'`'�'`1�11• Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 1 day of OCits b , 19 a 7 Ci E gineer 1.'ENG\P(B•FORNBIKPD-CO.DOT I Exhibit 'A' Sidewalk Easement Description Being a public easement for sidewalk purposes in the northeast one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, located in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the initial point of the Plat of Pacific Corporate Center, thence along the west right-of-way line of S.W. Sequoia Parkway, being 40 feet from centerline, N 01°13'16" E 431.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing N 01°13'16" E 30.33 feet to a point 25.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of S.W. Bonita Road; thence parallel with said centerline N 89°24'01" W 435.47 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 45.00 feet and a long chord bearing S 45°59'24" W a distance of 63.20 feet; thence 70.07 feet along said curve through a central angle of 89°13'10" to a point on the east right-of-way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue 25.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of said S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence parallel with said centerline S 01°22'49" W 412.42 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way line S 88°48'16" E 5.00 feet; thence N 01°22'49" E 412.41 feet; thence S 88°37'11" E 1.50 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 38.50 feet and a long chord bearing N 45°59'24" E 54.08 feet; thence 59.95 feet along said curve through a central angle of 89°13'10"; thence N 00°35'59" E 1.50 feet to a point 30.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of said S.W. Bonita Road; thence parallel with said centerline S 89°24'01" E 262.22 feet; thence S 51°07'36" E 13.47 feet; thence N 52°31'36" E 8.66 feet to a point 8.00 feet by perpendicular measure from said south right-of-way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence parallel with said centerline S 89°24'01" E 51.73 feet; thence S 51°19'37" E 8.66 feet; thence N 52°19'35" E 13.47 feet to a point 5.00 feet by perpendicular measure from said south right-of-way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence parallel with said centerline S 89°24'01" E 70.10 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 28.50 feet and a long chord of S 29°44'33" E a distance of 29.33 feet; thence 30.80 feet along said curve through a central angle of 61°55'37"; thence S 88°46'44" E 1.50 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 5,131 square feet more or less. 1547 3 • SI DHWAL ,< - AbFV - \ T NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W. M . CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON N00'35'59"E 8.00' 6.50' 1.50' INSET "B" 589'24'01"E 51.73' S51'07'36"E 588'37'11"E 13.47' 1'50 N52'31'36"E S51'19'37"E N5219'35"E 8.66' 8.66' 13.47' A = 89'13'10" R = 45.00' INSET "A" L = 70.07' LC = S45'59'24"W 63.20' S W B O\ I A ROAD j N 89'24'01" W i435.47' 25' 1n SEE 589'24'01"E A 262.22' N"-----4–`, 70.10' '� INSET "8" SEE 589'24'01"E ° 5.00' INSET "A" A = 89'13'10" P.0.8. W R = 38.50' A = 61'55'37" L = 59.95' R = 28.50' CH = N45'59'24"E L = 30.80' 54.08' CH = 529'44'33"E 29.33' Li _ < v I 0 N v v 588'46'44"E ,•7 1.50' SCALE 1" = 100' N f' W O —10- 25'-■•-- , O a, Q, o LEI v N Z V N O N Z P.O.C. --\ (f) 588•48'16"E 5.00' 11 —'ATE OF OREGON RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: SS CITY IJALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT. my of Washington CiTI'OF TIGARD I, Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assess- 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Tigard,OR 97223 Clerk for said county,do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received a. CoRI'ORATiON and recorded in book of records of said county. r.rt..%.1(\-Cu'jr=er FiloNu. ST) °1U>— Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessment and Taxation, Ex- Officio County Clerk EASEMENT Doc : 97101533 PERMANENT Rect: 196956 23. 00 SANITARY SEWER 10/29/1997 10: 02: 33am ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. hereinafter called the Grantors, grant and convey unto the City of Tigard a perpetual easement for constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting, and repairing of an underground sewer line and appurtenances, together with the right to remove, as necessary, vegetation, foliage, trees, and other obstructions on the parcel of land described in the attached Exhibit "A" situated in the City of Tigard. Washington County, State of Oregon. THE TRUE CONSIDERATION for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title, or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the rights of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors, their successors and assigns in the case of such event. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors, and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I hereunto set my hand on this 3rd day of October , 19 97 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY, INC . �.& Name of Corporation Signature W. M. Novak 14600 S .W. 72nd Avenue President Address Title Portland, Oregon 97224 Signature Title STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on October 3 , 1997 (date)by W. M. Novak (name(s)of person(s))as President (type of authority,e.g.,officer,trustee,etc) of Rogers Machinery Company, Inc. (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). OFFICIAL SEAL Notary's Signature ANN B.DAVIDSON `. NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.062616 My Commission Expires: 5/5/00 i MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 06,2000 111111'�'t1`111111'`t't'�1111111 Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 8 " day of dc-!° , 19 4 7 . City n ineer NO CHANGE EY TAX STATEMENT I`ENGTLIB-FOR.\MSA\T-C.DOT I 3 Exhibit 'A' Description for Public Sanitary Sewer Easement Being a strip of land, 15.00 feet wide, for public sanitary sewer easement purposes, in the northeast one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, located in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the initial point of the Plat of Pacific Corporate Center, thence along the west right-of-way line of S.W. Sequoia Parkway, being 40 feet from centerline, N 01°13'16" E 446.80 feet to a point 40.00 feet by perpendicular measure from the centerline of S.W. Bonita Road, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence parallel with said S.W. Bonita Road, N 89°24'01" W 468.85 feet to the Point of Terminus. EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion lying within the right-of-way of public roads. Containing 0.16 acres more or less. 15471eg1 SA \ TARY SEWHR IASFvE \ T EX -- 8 T NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W. M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON S . W. BO \ TA ROAD } S 89'24'01" E 25' 40.00' }- 15.00' j t I I N89'24'01"W 468.85' r P.O.B. Y W 1 15 FT PUBL:C rY SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Q z 0.16 ACRES ± w > A Q a I Q I 0 o 0' / w N(f) O I z W SCALE 1" = 100' z (f) CA -...- 40' — P.O.C. 3