The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1998-00025 WITHDRAWN SDR98 - 00025 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION NOTE TO THE FILE DATE: January 19, 2001 FROM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary RE: Inactive File FILE REF.: SDR 98-0025/ACT III THEATER EXPANSION HISTORY: 12/18/2000 the applicant was sent a letter from the City of Tigard indicating that the City was attempting to close out inactive files. A response deadline of 1/17/2001 was provided for the applicant to respond to in regard to the action they were going to take on their project, however, the deadline has expired and there has been no response received to date. 1/19/2001 — FILE IS CLOSED. h:\patty\masters\noteto.mst DIVISION OF STATE LANDS • RECEIVE) i`,q9 APR —5 A 8: 0 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD Community cDevelopment RECEIVED PLANN1N ingA Better Community iIATE: April 2,1999 TO: OREGON DIVISION OF STATE LANDS APR 1 91999 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: 15031 639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MR)98-01)26-ou-2 - ACT III THEATER EXPANSION + for Site Development Review approval to exn d the existing 11 screen theater to provide an .1 A request .c, Site �,e`✓2�vN ��..�,� ��,,.� to ..,.pan the existing provide 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Reese contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: At 4.1-v,4 F./l le, `/ Ce 4,ttc 4 i p 742„ ,,. L. c..-/6 /'�wl !/(� c w ?Z /k rt/t�d . � /vivoi ��a ✓ .o�j�s LhFrL✓sG�f d� l�oa� �#.i( -`� - dx�/ 77 ti 111 I ':i�L� �► (ctase provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: 7/�d/�/ty, Phone Number[sl: 3 -386- >( ZSV 1 A' F \ Li9l‘../ ) 6 i , ___J---- _. i ' - 1 Z 111 -=''!Q 11►11411111ti f I ll11'I�- o 111)1(IIIIIIIIIr � 011 11111}111111 111111I110 �OEI ° J u) 1j llll oilllltllill;il111U10 kiiiiiti = 1 0 I11!11111I1t ) •:•• ! —T ..__L } I _ C ENTRY DRIVE ♦n ! 7 IM TMTUIIInll11nd Z !� Z QIIIIIIHIIIOIIIIItllll� '� _ f Z TIGARD CINEMAS - �mo,._ , �-Ye J•.x. 41 \, 111 11111111 111_. ��c °' 111 IIIIIIllL :\r..=.1 q` 01111.111W , 32 1111111111111111+111111 V ( 1t !11111 n- 111 H 11 1111 # , /may /� / , • ' = 11111111 # 1 QI11111I1111111111.111111I t \. McDONALDS - 11111111111111111 w. _ i 11 II II11'I11111I1C11111t \' '""`•"."' ‘w ''. / /////////t 7/77/217 e - - ..1." J _ ' 4-SW 72"D AVENUE-*' - - \_..... - a Ce Q 0 I- U- 0 V SITE PLAN At SDR 98-0025 EXHIBIT MAP N ACT III THEATER (map is not to scale) EXPANSION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 TO: Patty Stambaugh,US West Communications Engineering FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1 S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: N1 (Please provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: � �T Phone Number[sl: ' C5Ap yin f UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Julia Powell Hajduk, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffinan, USA J wL SUBJECT: Act III Theater Expansion, SDR 98-0026 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STGRM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists. Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96- 44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive area shall be identified on plans. DIVISION OF STATE LANDS/CORPS OF ENGINEERS A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the creek or wetlands. EROSION CONTROL A joint 1200-C erosion control permit is required. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270,MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 D TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031 639-41M/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]98-0026', 5� ACT III THEATER EXPANSION < A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: U , We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. APR 0 5 1999 Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: By � � L- y C l 1./o ' 3C��I�w �/ t� v,,,, v �► (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 1 1175, 4 I Phone Numberfsl: ?a 4— RECEIVED PLANNINu REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI TY OF TIGARD APR 7 1999 CommunityDevefopment CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED Shaping Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 APR OF 1999 TO: US Army Corps.of Engineers REGULATORY BRANCH FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]98-0026-)-) ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: / �'` ; _ / 1, ..i . ! �� ,� IL I/!L. L�� R )24 / ' ' //4, t I'I Q g�.!i� ' i i �LL ww III ��i// 1_I / yl / '.-I 0 I Ai 11 Ara V ' a �_ // P /�A .L2/ +!,.I/L �� i ; . iii/ /LI ° YZ_ ap a�e 71-2'\_/ • �t o p ,;0. • L . ! I / p 1 (cPkas e provide the fof&wing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): :,j 96 ve"- REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNINenmunity(Devetopment S(aping A Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 APR 1 4 1999 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-41T1/Fax: [503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72114, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. / Please refer to the enclosed letter. ✓ Written comments provided below: (4°O'Cre: \t\1/4Z ck" .1171 ""*3N V°13%( ‘'t \cA " " cor ( b"J 2 " N\3\'' ' ad d \` t 441(Tkase provide t/ie fodowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: OIM Wa1c x ,11.-0 TRI-COUNTY M, POLITAN DocC #: TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON co, CAPITAL PROJECTS &FACIUTIES DIVISION 710 NE HOLLADAY STREET TRI-MET RI-MET PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 FAX COVER PAGE DATE: 4/14/1999 NO. OF PAGES (including cover) 2 TO: Julia Powell Hajduk COMPANY: City of Tigard Planning Division FAX NO.: 684-7297 FROM: Michael Kiser PHONE: 239-2102 FAX NO.: 239-2281 25 COMMENTS: Comments for SDR 98-00 11I Theater expansion ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WILL FOLLOW: ❑ Yes le No If this fax is incomplete please call (NAME) at (PHONE NUMBER] documenl2 04/14/99 10:3E Jd L62L 1789 £0S:01 1822-6£2-£0S 1N3Wd013f130 133f0 d:W0d3 02:01 66 OT-ddd • TRI-COUNTY METROPOLI or..4 u TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON DocC #PP0417 CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION TRyMET PORTLAND,OREGON STREET 7232 April 13, 1999 Julia Powell Hajduk City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 98-0026 - Act III Theater Expansion— City of Tigard Dear Ms. Hajduk' Tri-Met welcomes the opportunity to comment on this proposal to expand the Tigard Cinemas near the intersection of SW 72na Avenue and SW Pacific Highway in Tigard The area is served by Tri-Met lines 12, 64X and 95X and the site is adjacent to Tri-Met's Tigard Park & Ride lot. The purpose of our recommendations is to minimize the traffic impacts of new development by encouraging development patterns that are transit, bicycle, and pedestrian supportive. Improved pedestrian access and connection promotes walking and reduces local dependence on automobiles. TRI-MET STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Provide sidewalks along the new entry driveway and extend the driveway and sidewalk to the western property line. This will help to facilitate a connection to SW Atlanta Street. Sidewalks also help to facilitate on-site circulation and provide access to the primary pedestrian network. Improved access and connection, along with the separation of pedestrian and automobile traffic, will encourage more people to walk or use transit as a travel option, Such pathways reduce the travel distance to local destinations and support the state's Transportation Planning Rule. Provide a direct, delineated pedestrian pathway that connects the new parking lot with the building entrance. A well-defined pathway through the parking area helps to facilitate safe on-site circulation through the separation of pedestrian and automobile traffic The applicant should contact Tri-Met to negotiate modifications to the existing shared use agreement prior to city approval. A shared use agreement exists between Act 111 and Tri-Met for the use and maintenance of the Park and Ride lot adjacent to the Cinema site. Due to the potential impacts, and the potential for additional shared use opportunities, it is necessary that the current agreement be modified to reflect the proposed changes. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. if you have any questions, please contact me at 239-2102. Sincerely, "zip) Michael Kiser, Pr ' ct Planner (503)238-RIDE • TTY 238-5811 - http://www.trl-rnet org k:\projplamphil-h1cornments10413naldoc 20:391dd L62L b89 20S:01 T822-622-20S 1N3Wd013n30 iD3fOdd:WOa d 02:01 66 t T-ddd REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community DeveCopment RECEIVED PLANNING Shaping J4(Better Community 'DATE: April 2,1999 APR 12 1999 TO: Acting Building Official CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1 S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. /�la 1 i' Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide thefoltowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: t�G�� MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ?_-.• RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Julia Powell Hajduk APR 12 1999 FROM: Bob Poskin CITY OF TIGARD DATE: April 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Site Development review, Act III Theater Expansion Accessibility - OSSC, Chapter 11 Accessible Parking—ORS 447-223, requires 17 Spaces. Site plan shows 14 — Stalls on the NE Side require curb ramps. The accessible route from the building to the public way, where the driveway access occurs provide curb ramps at the beginning and end as well as tactile warnings. Fire—UFC, Chapter 9 and Appendix A-111-A-1 & TVFD Ordinance Provide three(3)hydrants with 250 feet of all portions of the proposed construction. See attached drawing for required location. Please note, if they feel the placement requirement cannot be accomplished, then an access road at the back of the buildings will be required 15 feet back from the face of the building, and the third hydrant will still be required. Storm Sewer—OSPC Chapter 11, section 1108 and table 11-2 Sizing of all storm drainage piping shall be hydrodynamic calculated by an Oregon licensed engineer. Geo-Tech A soil strength loss report and liquefaction potential study will be required. Water Supply The project is in the Tualatin Valley Water district. Applicant should contact Gary Pippen or Stu Davis—642-1511 for their comments. • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI OF IIGARD Community cDeveropment RECEIVED PLANNING Shaping Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 APR 7 1999 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant CITY OF 1 I(iAht, FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0026, ACT III THEATER EXPANSION II A request for Site nevelopment Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide on additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ><:, We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ( (ase provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: �� ,��- I Phone Number[sl: • ]cD-4 40(, I REQUEST FOR COMMENT IVED PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development DATE: April 2,1999 APR 1 3 199,Shaping A Better Community TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ty We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (cdease provide the foltowing information)Name of Personlsl Commenting: ir Phone Numberisl: 1 44r, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS .„41. TicARD Community Development l � RECEIVtter Community DATE: April 2,1999 TO: Nadine Smith,Advanced Planning Supervisor APR 1 3 1999 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)98-0026- ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (4'lease provide the following information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: kqZ4 c * a Ap1,--05-99 01 . 55P TCI St _ Helens 503 397 5686 P .02 f\ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS crry OF71l ARb Community Dece&?pment Shaping A‘Better'(.o m m unit' DATE: Alf 1-L 1999 TO: Pat McGann,TellCahlevisiin of Oregon MOM: mot Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell NaIdulk Assoc 1ate Pf aoner Phone: 15031830-4171/F3x: 150316841297 ��_:.:.. .._._,......___._. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MSORI 98-0026 r ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an 1 additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72"d, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72"' Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1 S136D8, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR QQMM.ENT$_BAcK-. y: APRIL13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Ifyauate unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: --------_ _..-.1 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office. _._.. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _..�_ Written comments provided below: ,i'Crtsc ptery:ldt'the fvf(vuarxfj irrrirrrna:ion}Name of PersotltSlCommenting, ,fit Apr'-05-99 01 : 54P TCI St_Helens 503 397 5686 P_01 a r FCI FAX COVER SHEET DATE : AC? TIME: 0: 445-- /e/11., r TO: N..1 rot/veil, fJ/2jDtkJ1 i(-1 SS l4 ,?Ath/Ek'. .PLats,ttuAl& . ,vi.;5/0A/ FROM ; 4 C •. 0.0A/.s712.1.4..C7W TCI OF TUALAT I N VALLEY 14200 S .W. BRIGAD00N CT, BEAVERTON , OREGON 97005 PHONE: (.503) 60.5-4895 FAX: (503) 6o5-Y8&6 NUMBER OF PACES IN THIS TRANSMISSION INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: NOTES : TC7 of Tualatin Valley.Inc. 14200 S.W.9+fgadOon Court Beaverton.OA 97005 (503)60S-4895 FAX($03)645$004 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: S /3 ekerS/O6 of lf.4T6.L. SEILV/c£ Ace*. Pz4orest eOAI74 Tiili/O ( 64Z-/S%/ (Please provide thiefoilowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: M«2. `:t Oregon Department of Transportation "a•. Region 1 123 NW Flanders John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 April 21, 1999 FILE CODE: PLA9-2A-TIG-1W City of Tigard RECEIVED PLANNING Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard APR 2 7 Tigard, OR 97223 1999 CITY OF TIGARD Att: Julia Hajduk Subject: SDR 98-0026: Act III Expansion Highway 99W and 72nd Avenue The proposed expansion of the Act III Theaters is adjacent to OR 99W. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, OR 99W has a Statewide highway classification and we have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. ODOT has the following comments: • We recommend that the City require the applicant to extend the two southbound lanes on 72nd Avenue past McDonalds to allow vehicles coming off the highway more time and distance to merge into one lane. Currently, dual westbound left turn lanes feed into two southbound exit lanes on 72nd Avenue, which drop to one lane at the McDonalds driveway. This improvement would make the dual left turn off the highway operate more effectively as well as reduce merging conflict related accidents on 72nd Avenue. • We support the city's effort in providing local street connectivity, which in turn relieves the motorists' dependence on Highway 99W. Alternative routes or modes of transportation is necessary to relieve the expected increase in congestion in the area. Chi Mai, ODOT Transportation Analyst, provided the technical review of the traffic study. If you have any questions regarding the above recommendation, Ms. Mai can be reached at 731-8542. I can be reached at 731-8258. Thank you, 4 i / r Marah Danielson Planner Development Review Cc: Martin Jensvold, Chi Mai, ODOT Region 1 Sam Hunaidi, Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Form 734-1850(1/98) 04/21/99 10:41 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS I J001 -13` Oregon Department artment of Transportation CE. 1`4 Region 1 123 NW Flanders , John A.Kivhabcr,M.D..Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 _ (503)731-8200 _ ``,p papal FAX(503)731-8259 April 21, 1999 � Fax Note R7673 ) 19' To j 'a O • IC FILE CODE: Fax , - i 9 PLA9-2A-TIG-1W City of Tigard From PC 'IC Planning Division Phone,/ 13125 SW HaII Boulevard 731— Tigard, OR 97223 Att: Julia Hajduk Subject: SDR 98-0016: Act Ill Expansion Highway 99W and 72'd Avenue The proposed expansion of the Act III Theaters is adjacent to OR 99W. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, OR 99W has a Statewide highway classification and we have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. ODOT has the following comments: • We recommend that the City require the applicant to extend the two southbound lanes on 72nd Avenue past McDonalds to allow vehicles coming off the highway more time and distance to merge into one lane. Currently, dual westbound left turn lanes feed into two southbound exit lanes on 72nd Avenue, which drop to one lane at the McDonalds driveway_ This improvement would make the dual left turn off the highway operate more effectively as well as reduce merging conflict related accidents on 72nd Avenue. • We support the city's effort in providing local street connectivity, which in turn relieves the motorists' dependence on Highway 99W. Alternative routes or modes of transportation is necessary to relieve the expected increase in congestion in the area. Chi Mai, ODOT Transportation Analyst, provided the technical review of the traffic study. If you have any questions regarding the above reccmmendation, Ms. Mai can be reached at 731-8542_ I can be reached at 731-8258. Thank you, / / // / /� Marah Danielson Planner Development Review Cc: Martin Jensvold, Chi Mai, ODOT Region 1 Sam Hunaidi, Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Form 734-1850(1/9S) REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MR)98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: - — A 11(2kase provide the follirwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 'CIT Area: [CI [[I [S] [WI CITIIEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS -Li Place for review in Library CIT Bookls1 FILE NOISI.: )-Oft 00 FILE NAMEISI: /y G7_ iv>-v>'c/ 4Nrins;o CITY OFFICES ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Planntng Supennsor COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./owmn,s r.hnK,ans _POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _BUILDING DIV./David Scott,a,iainooniciai ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,unpn,nrR.vewEngnser _WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Limes manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,coy Reowder OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,PropenyManager _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,Neghbrhd Cooa PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie.creenseaces Coordinator(cPA'srzoA s) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200 PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration _Brent Curtis(CPA's) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera 'DOT,REGION 1 * Scott King(CPAs) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,Dvipmt Rev.Conrd Mike Borreson(Engineer) CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Jim Tice(IGAs) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Do. Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Tom Harry(Current P1.Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALIT./ _Phil Healy(Current Pi.Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * Sr.Cartographer tcPazcAirrs,. Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Permit spec.i.s( 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 Right-of-Way Section Naca,lons) Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R, BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northem Santa Fe R/R Predecessors Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _ICI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY GENERAL TELEPHONE _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO3O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 * -IMOICAVLS AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IF WITHIN SOO' OF fag sUSISCr Ia'ROPSAWC FOR ANL"/ALL CUT PAOI.CCV5. frAO;LCT PLANIILA IS ALS.PONSIBLX rose INOICAIINC INSTILS TO NOTIfM/ h:\patty\masters\ricnotice.mst 15-Mar-99 - *PR-27-99 01 : 17 PM SAUVIE IS. WILDLIFE AREA 503 621 3025 P. 01 t�, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, OREGON '' �.•• SA UVIE ISLAND WILDLIFE AREA = N WILLAMETTE WATERSHED DISTRICT OFFICE rill � �� 18330 NW SA UVIE ISLAND ROAD PORTLAND, OR 97231 *Fish a Wildli e TELEPHONE NO. 503-621-3488 FAX NO. 503-621-3025 DATE.- / _ 9 ' PAGES TO FOLLOW: TO. :Jul, a f}a �ur FROM: - lEINS SUBJECT: -------- COMMENTS: < < ; B , Pj k.S OO L J , 5174q'ZT 4 e0 1 R-27-99 01 : 17 PM SAUVIE IS. WILDLIFE AREA 503 621 3025 P. 02 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Development SfapitcyA(Better Community iE: A111113,1999 6 I.V0 TO: Oregon Oeuarment of Fish a Wildlife -P L-\' , . 4, , Q6. (V-- C t. . s , ��v'DSC\ FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Jolla Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: [5031 684-1291 h M.� SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0025 I ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional ti screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are !i located west of SW 72" , south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the SIte Plan, Vicinity Map and AiwliCanrs Statement for your review. From Information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be Drepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS_BACK BY: APRIL 21,1999[OR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE DUE TO TIME CONSTRAINTS! THANK YOU). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable Lo respond DIM;above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing k as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, [ Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: j I. We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: JJ � l �f /h�. Lf � ll r 5/2/7 I r LPL 1,,m( /)✓c E'•r i* f?.1'!StLL 01`k?4 fi4 e.,1 d (u't%/ 'p cif) A ! _..Per'✓! __. Jt? f trP�tcFtc%/tr —�l�i c'r o ' 414-- `.3 '-ctiii f NC4.! 61rid V? ` -__ 1 Y11 LY';t� fC, �‘r,r,f,?„. Ae C.l1J Y O 0.6-L vo 1 J I r c . _.. . . Qn_ . I f_J J may' Q ,�,�j�� l i . Gar( f t c.LI/t4- `'11.c Li YJ n 1�Qr �t [S01tQ•�c.) rf'1/it_ 0 Fk)0.n +tv\[�� Ql I)olcA`-> 1 ei Nwi t rlpr`''. 17 e.;-/y ,iv f' -3 L,oU1r- .CAGJ+ o:4-0 a. tk CPS 4\R-at Si10rrv.walrr Yur��5_-Pr,c{ c.) d�15, ■"t�, Q,ns<\ to ,- L . c."J ' -11/1,,, p ts]p(_'�� <1 cj\C1 h:, v►1o,y tQ v l t'e: Stc*-- C�+n c\ Ff ,),rzn.y kq Y►n, _. Pi,,,„•F„„id try fotr,u.ng information)Name of Persons)Commenting j [Phone Number[sl: Co i I - 3 q$8 MAILING RECORDS I _..J--_, = IIIIIII11IIj1111III111! Z 1t1IIIIIIIII�I� -- 1Q(II'uY1IIEit11IlII'I'^ 4 a1(11111iill)II111tiJI Irro a o = J u) IIII1111i(III1111111111$IIIIo Lowild - 0 I! UUIIi0lI ••• I c �-T � � ENTRY NYE V• —J � Z I Z 11 � .._-- f Z TIGARD CINEMAS i I �. \ '' ' J ,� � ; � ,VIII I IIIII{IILIII 'may f III IIIIII1L q` n 111 1,101* = \. . � s r-H1-INHr_I+14-41HHHI+'Iw I - i Y�1 - ^ \`� = 11111111111111IIUI1111V C 1111 11111111111111 iir / / / _ IIII(III4 X44 11 I --N McDONALD'S 1111111111111i " _ 81-11 4{11I(I11111g111110 ' \. .. .. -• ��.' \ --)-- . / ��.e... — W ........... - •"1r.J - ' .T —SW 72ND AVENUE - \__,v.,_ - - i CI c Q 0 I- LL. 0 >— I— U SITE PLAN i SDR 98-0025 EXHIBIT MAP N ACT III THEATER (map is not to scale) EXPANSION r.. I i___L_ _.-=-_-- I___ ___I_— 1 — CITY of TIGARD . GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ST I . SPRUCE n VICINITY MAP IL , _ IllU E linli ICI --sT ■ a= - a I ■ ■��■ 46 SDR 98-0025 iti MIll si- , , 1■ pi 1 ACT III THEATER a ( (3) SUBJECT EXPANSION = . k PARCELS p .1 $ I1 IP 4 k. , It__I; -I' , , li ij ) ‘„ III , I 1111t44 Al , IIII (y ■ _______ , ■ ggiolli I - Ill ■■ '� - ■: r 0 200 400 600 Feet b IN d re 473 feet ■ CLINT I ST a 1 i . III City of Tigard 111111 I Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. I 13125 SW Hall Blvd I Tigard,OR 97223 DARTMOUTH ST (503)639.4171 hitp:J/wMNV.ci.ligard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Mar 31,1999;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR FAX TRANSMITTAL CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: May 7, 1999 TO: Tammy Evans, Legals Section/Community Newspapers (fax)620-3433 FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard Planning Division (phone)639-4171 PLEASE PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN THE LEGALS SECTION OF THE TIGARD TIMES,THE FOLLOWING: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0025 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. [PLACE VICINITY MAP HEREI The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on MAY 26,1999. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM MAY 26,1999. TT PUBLISH DATE: MAY 13,1999 SDR 98-0025 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION SDR 98-0025/ACT III THEATER EXPANSION (Page 1 of 3) 1 S 136CA-01800 1 S 136CD-01400 MILNE REAL PROPERTIES INC PARK NICK S P O BOX 2740 11654 SW PACIFIC HWY#5 PORTLAND,OR 97208 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136C D-01401 1 S 136CD-01500 JOHNSON JULIE A LIFE ESTATE AND SCHULZ DAVID TR 19430 NE HASSALO 11649 VIA MONTANA PORTLAND,OR 97230 YUMA,AZ 85367 1 S 136CD-01501 1 S 136CD-01601 QAYUM ABDUL AND ISMAT DOUGHTY J PAUL AND LILLI 18245 RIVER EDGE CT 10150 SW CANYON RD LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1S136CD-02000 1S136CD-04300 WAREMART INC WAREMART INC 3336 E 32ND ST#217 3336 E 32ND ST#217 TULSA, OK 74135 TULSA,OK 74135 1S136DA-00902 1S136DA-01100 OREGON EDUCATION ASSN ANDERSON MELDREN W 6900 SW HAINES 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136DA-01101 1S136DA-01102 TIGARD CITY OF ANDERSON MELDREN W 13125 SW HALL 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136DA-01200 1S136DA-01300 ANDERSON MELDREN W AND ANDERSON MELDREN W 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136DA-01302 1S136DA-02100 ANDERSON MELDREN W&GLADYS BEACH DAYLE D EVELYN 0 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B 11530 SW 72ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-00190 1S136DB-00200 OREGON STATE OF FRANCESCHI JEROME R/GENEVIEVE T 411 TRANSPORTATION BLDG 37 SAN MATEO CT SALEM, OR 97310 SAN RAFAEL,CA 94903 1S136DB-00201 1S136DB-00500 WILMINGTON TRUST CO TRUSTEE GALVAN&GUITRON PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 42121 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY PORTLAND,OR 97242 TIGARD,OR 97223 SDR 98-0025/ACT III THEATER EXPANSION (Page 2 of 3) 1S136DB-00501 1S136DB-00600 UNION GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF PTLD TYSON ALFRED J& 37 SAN MATEO CT PO BOX 35370 SAN RAFAEL,CA 94903 LOUISVILLE,KY 40232 1S1 36DB-00700 1S1 36D B-00800 CORBIN GROVER D TRUSTEE MORRIS LARRY A&JOAN C TRS PO BOX 35370 10930 SW MIRA CT LOUISVILLE, KY 40232 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-02400 1S136DB-02500 CHAMPION RONALD V AND PIERCE GRACE AND 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY 6501 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-02501 1S136DB-02502 WESTSIDE HOLDING CO LLC PIERCE GILBERT E 11632 SW PACIFIC HWY 11634 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-02600 1S136DB-02601 STEWART PHYLLIS T AND ALPROP CO 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR 6149 SW SHATTUCK RD LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97221 1S136DB-02602 1S136DB-02603 STEWART PHYLLIS AND TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR 4012 SE 17TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97202 1S136DC-00200 1S136DC-00300 THOMAS ALFRED E AND JUNE R WOZNIAK JOHN G AND DARLENE M 7135 SW BAYLOR 14200 SW FERN ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DC-00301 1S136DC-00400 BUEHLER JAMES D&MELISSA S CHASE WILLIAM L VIOLET 7175 SW BAYLOR ST 11580 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DC-00500 1S136DC-02503 TOM MOYER THEATRES LURIA MARK T AND 7132 COMMERCIAL PARK DR 19601 N 27TH AVE 4TH FLOOR KNOXVILLE,TN 37918 PHOENIX,AZ 85027 1S136DC-02504 15136DC-02900 SUPERVALU HOLDINGS INC KOCH ROBERT J 3336 E 32ND ST#217 7130 SW BAYLOR ST TULSA, OK 74135 TIGARD,OR 97223 SDR 98-0025/ACT III THE' R EXPANSION (Pe 3 of 3) 1S136DC-03000 1S136DC-03100 HORNE WILLIAM I/ROBBIE L AMACHER JUANITA AND 7160 SW BAYLOR 12060 SW ROSE VISTA DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DC-03200 1S136DC-04500 FEGLES MARY A WAREMART INC 11205 SW SUMMERFIELD DR 3336 E 32ND ST#217 TIGARD,OR 97224 TULSA,OK 74135 TIM REED PHYLLIS STEWART EASTGATE THEATER, INC. c/o DON MALTASE 919 SW TAYLOR, SUITE 900 C & R REAL ESTATE SERVICES PORTLAND OR 97205 1440 SW TAYLOR PORTLAND OR 97205 MARAH DANIELSON TOM MOYER THEATERS ODCT REGION 1 1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 900 123 NW FLANDERS PORTLAND OR 97205 PORTLAND, OR 97209-4037 MICHAEL ROBINSON STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2600 PORTLAND OR 97204-1268 CE ST r — CITY TIGARTE roP I GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM I Sr -- ' NOTIFICATION 17 ..,7_11.- jA All AREA MAP P (2S0') n 01360800201 I sT j l _ ) 151360800190 ) W 4. 131360800501 S D R 98-0025 • 1S1360800200 1513611110 1 151360800800151360800500 1513600800100 ��y s;206o 2616 '(3) r ., I I ACT III THEATER 15136CA01800 t 1513 6 011013 0 0 PARCELS 1 iS1 3 0 011 0 110 0 151960060866 '14 13366061962 EXPANSION ; ,?2 I 0000 „s��`.., \ v 1513608,r 1S136080250,IN 0 \151300002603 6,� iSias0A00901 III 4111111V iS136C001401 - .., 1013608-1-25 �"1M G`��G 151360001500 151360002400 QP 1s13sc6o14o0 1s136coo1601 — : ' :.5 A r- /5136C001501 1 -01 4 . 014_,........ I / ---_ BAIL_OR ST / 151366003000 %, 1819118002000 151368G03100 /% 15136000 900 W N 151360003200 Q 1513600O2503 0 200 400 600 Feet 1S1360002504 - 1S1366004300 1S1360004500 1"=473 feet CIN ON ST Allhi, ilw. - /',''''T,e72'i';,'',.,'', ;," 11 Tr -- 1 ■ i____ City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and �.•• ^� should be veri0ed with the Development Services Division. II`L • 13125 SW Hall Blvd r DARTMOUTH ST Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639.4171 . I I r-7 1 1 l http.//www.cr.0gard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Mar 31, 1999;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR SDR 98-0025/ACT III THEATER EXPANSION (Page 1 of 3) • 1S136CA-01800 1S136CD-01400 MILNE REAL PROPERTIES INC PARK NICK S P 0 BOX 2740 11654 SW PACIFIC HWY#5 PORTLAND,OR 97208 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CD-01401 1S136CD-01500 JOHNSON JULIE A LIFE ESTATE AND SCHULZ DAVID TR 19430 NE HASSALO 11649 VIA MONTANA PORTLAND, OR 97230 YUMA,AZ 85367 1S136CD-01501 1S136CD-01601 QAYUM ABDUL AND ISMAT DOUGHTY J PAUL AND LILLI 18245 RIVER EDGE CT 10150 SW CANYON RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1S136CD-02000 1S136CD-04300 WAREMART INC WAREMART INC 3336 E 32ND ST#217 3336 E 32ND ST#217 TULSA, OK 74135 TULSA,OK 74135 1S136DA-00902 1S136DA-01100 OREGON EDUCATION ASSN ANDERSON MELDREN W 6900 SW HAINES 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136DA-01101 1S136DA-01102 TIGARD CITY OF ANDERSON MELDREN W 13125 SW HALL 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136DA-01200 1S136DA-01300 ANDERSON MELDREN W AND ANDERSON MELDREN W 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136DA-01302 1S136DA-02100 ANDERSON MELDREN W&GLADYS BEACH DAYLE D EVELYN 0 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B 11530 SW 72ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-00190 1S136DB-00200 OREGON STATE OF FRANCESCHI JEROME R/GENEVIEVE T 411 TRANSPORTATION BLDG 37 SAN MATEO CT SALEM,OR 97310 SAN RAFAEL,CA 94903 1S136DB-00201 1S136DB-00500 WILMINGTON TRUST CO TRUSTEE GALVAN&GUITRON PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 42121 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY PORTLAND,OR 97242 TIGARD,OR 97223 SDR 98-0025/ACT III THEATER EXPANSION (Page 2 of 3) • • 1S136DB-00501 1S136DB-00600 UNION GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF PTLD TYSON ALFRED J& 37 SAN MATEO CT PO BOX 35370 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 LOUISVILLE,KY 40232 1 S 136DB-00700 1S1 36DB-00800 CORBIN GROVER D TRUSTEE MORRIS LARRY A&JOAN C TRS PO BOX 35370 10930 SW MIRA CT LOUISVILLE, KY 40232 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-02400 1S136DB-02500 CHAMPION RONALD V AND PIERCE GRACE AND 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY 6501 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-02501 1S136DB-02502 WESTSIDE HOLDING CO LLC PIERCE GILBERT E 11632 SW PACIFIC HWY 11634 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136D B-02600 1S1 36DB-02601 STEWART PHYLLIS T AND ALPROP CO 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR 6149 SW SHATTUCK RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97221 1S136DB-02602 1S136DB-02603 STEWART PHYLLIS AND TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR 4012 SE 17TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97202 1S136DC-00200 1S136DC-00300 THOMAS ALFRED E AND JUNE R WOZNIAK JOHN G AND DARLENE M 7135 SW BAYLOR 14200 SW FERN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DC-00301 1S136DC-00400 BUEHLER JAMES D&MELISSA S CHASE WILLIAM L VIOLET 7175 SW BAYLOR ST 11580 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DC-00500 1S136DC-02503 TOM MOYER THEATRES LURIA MARK T AND 7132 COMMERCIAL PARK DR 19601 N 27TH AVE 4TH FLOOR KNOXVILLE,TN 37918 PHOENIX,AZ 85027 1 S 136DC-02504 1 S 136DC-02900 SUPERVALU HOLDINGS INC KOCH ROBERT J 3336 E 32ND ST#217 7130 SW BAYLOR ST TULSA,OK 74135 TIGARD,OR 97223 SDR 98-0025/ACT III THEATER EXPANSION (Page 3 of 3) 1S136DC-03000 1S136DC-03100 HORNE WILLIAM I/ROBBIE L AMACHER JUANITA AND 7160 SW BAYLOR 12060 SW ROSE VISTA DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DC-03200 1S136DC-04500 FEGLES MARY A WAREMART INC 11205 SW SUMMERFIELD DR 3336 E 32ND ST#217 TIGARD,OR 97224 TULSA,OK 74135 (,( ) OBhe jts%.n6'✓ vi p.mlo/iv/ $ '9' J° c L'' %/✓�`'�'7s l4,na tq xba- ib`i, 3/J)j✓1 G►0St 7 ! ' � ?/?b UlbB 00500909ELS1 I E09Z0909EISI CITY OF TIGARD i 11 I 11 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Julia laialliOAGgaiNtO 191zS a e64?-/ s ' ' .` L. , �� N �. VC-L)- G 11.1„1„.1"1,111.,„1..II ,I Michael Robin 500 SW Fifth Avenue, S ' e if Portland, OR 97204 ‘ i,S,. '\),i_i I:\‘4,;%4 17aaniallaillgi 11.1.,1...1„1.l„1,1,.11.I„i,„,li,i„I,I„i,.i,1J,i„,I1,1 CITY OF TIGARD 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. iur T ti Tigard,Oregon 97223 `t I Not-e,rverobse As A Q-1..... . Unabio To Forwad Ci . l'. (c)C C'-' \.:\\, MICHAEL ROBINSON 500 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2300 PORTLAND OR 97204 AN _,,., ..��,ws-: Ilahtli ltIJ,11 111,1111111111),1llfl"1.1..1h..l h//ODU1l�l ' ,..o.r1v:fi A CITY OF TIGARD March 30, 1999 OREGON Tim Reed Eastgate Theater, Inc. 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 Re: Notice of Complete Application Submittal/SDR 98-0025 Dear Mr. Reed: The City has received the additional submittal items requested in the December 11, 1998 letter of incompleteness. Staff has reviewed the additional information and finds that it is sufficient to deem that application complete and begin the review process. A tentative decision date of May 13, 1999 has been scheduled. Please be aware, however, that this date may change. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171 extension 407. Sincerely, I fi , Julia Powell Hajd'k Associate Planner i:\curpin\Julia\SDR\actIllaccept21.doc c: SDR 98-0025 Land use file Michael Robinson, 500 SW Fifth, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97204 Bill Monahan Jim Hendryx Dick Bewersdorff 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 APPLICANT MATERIALS ._ •___ AMA L.p. ....J iiv�. V ,_• ..Lia� UUX tiO4_t7CT III T}-EATRE5 TO= 1 583 241 1999 M 2Si 195E1 a=seam 144Ve P.m A j, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW . ` ' APPLICATION :, OF TI & p 73723 SW 1-1811 Siva., r ,,rer. F; a- -, . '9 b f7c. (-,DJ) G3.9-4171 FAY.: x5031 884-7297 .r4►i < • 211EORMATICAN Pt:C-APP. HELD W111-1: AmEA /�OBF.QTS ixl.TE OF pFt. p.: ,.party AddressJLoCati NS); 11626`SW Pacific Highway --� FOR STAFFy9R Oda r Mop 8 Tax #�(sj: Map 151 36 8 SW., Tax Lot 500; /' 06 C.-se NC.(s): 4 2cf- [/r�o7s •f t - • - . , 011-ter Case tle.jsl: • Si :ze 10. 12 acres and 4.46 acres = 14. 58 acres Fit=ipt No.: 9i1°_3i/pce.2-- Owner/ HoidQrt$)•. See attachment ApplieationA: q �G ! • roes - `' - - Zip: - _ Date Determined To Be mplete: ,•plrcartr. East ate Theatre, Inc. 5 ?,o c" .•rte; 919 SW Tagior, Suite 900 phone. 221-0213 Gbh plgNZcrne Design, p8; • Portland, OR -� — C_C/ C Zip: I n tthe owner and the dppiteant are different a°aple. tIJD apptl;�•�nt cif area: t�cz - I b - the purchaser of reczrd or'z lessee in pose site With writter� Paw.aa�m �„�,.,�,�. • .-Bticm from the OWner or an agent of the owner_ The t7wn.,r(r.) • situ► then ErDplicatip1 in the space provided tan the Seel( of thi: or submit a written authorization with this applir3 �tio . '• - .. - -. REQVISMUMEI AL ELENEtwrrs " ApD43tiOn Eiements Submitted: to owner". of reeom of the subject property r!t=uest She APpr titm Pam JVPtopment Review approval to allow(please bf. sp!►titec)_ C4-' Owner's SignaturelWrittsn AulheitTetfOrt To obtain Site Devel opment Review (SDR) approval it 1 ipe Transfer l, yrneni or Deed for n expansion of the [ Site/Plot Nan 01-I/ f.Q eoples beleo an Dreabo enetlt rsr) '� r„r" +twat Plan (reduced 8'/.`x /1-) r ha ``_'______ '(sue Aopti_ant's Statement •=ver:oaset]on pre-a pp think @m) ._ - Cox n Co s: Estimate 3, 2 5 ti f USA Sower Use lnfurmaticn Gard t a mt►ioa+,weompietea at insetication submittal? Fee ionaarszov-000t__.-_..S 800.= tsttell000-sws.eaor....51.G00.00 9 d�. a 0..-n__St.7do.00 •-- � c-ss'StO.coot t EXHIBIT 6 17/e a6ed`gz17# '`•ilVe0:01 06/Will -A11V38 8 V 0 :Aq luag �M:ACT III THEATRES T0= 5032202480 JU 199a 1fd:4i 1M t-t475 P.03 ., .FRort:ACT I] t THEATRES TO: 1 503 241 1993 JUN 25. 1738 t3"rai3Rm P4715 P. ( ARIANCr.. co ,ND1TteAL USE, SEN5rTtyp LANDS• OR OTHER L1,I11D USE ACTIONS II, be contidered a ppueatlr,n: • TS: • r an apDtltatton cturrpht8, you win rues to submit ALL of am J:_QU1 on the front of this apptication 1n tM'Rmqulred Submittal Pomona' trot ubmitt ai Requirement inbrmatsvn shevez tan be pbL3ined, uoor, request, br atl h' 's tAnd UsaAppiicalions•) ANT(5) SHALL.CERTIFY THAT: •� � It7�JtLt:'+�tt>? bt Itttt?diaw[f 1n� z} Q� - spvCcatfen it granted, the apptant unit cxercte the right. rnte. in a -�rtian a with the and fortiiattons of the epprvval. and sttb •t to 811 above staternerttn and the statements in 13: plat plan, artathrrnrnm• and nshbiLS trnr1 iniiled herewith, are trite; appli nts so acknowledge that any permit issued; l:zs►don thy apps:atioti. may be revoked a It is found that 5temenl3 are WV). r • •ant hat mad the antire contents of the app1ation• itiduding the K,:l e5 and criteria. and undansiands the Thetrei for approving or denying the appli=ior. • SiONATURES of gath owner of the rvttjc yr-erty. DAM) this 5 /'''+ da,.a _JL 14 -ra M Msrrae ,THICAIj , ASV QRaGorV F#ierN • O• ner's Signature G� �,,. •� / Cu CnvneYS i raft.. F PhyllJs T. Stewart Date Q— b/L' abea`b?bti �iaf v v?U:Q l 116/q0/ 44 `%9z tvzz�n� x i�vau N :�(a iva RECEIVED PLANNING MAR 3 0 1998 Webber Properties, L.L.C. CITY OF TIGARD 12155 S.W. Wildwood St., Tigard, OR 97224-2919 684-6622 March 24, 1998 Richard Bewersdorff, Senior Planner City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard Act III Theaters Expansion Proposal Gentlemen: We are the owners of the commercial building located at 11632 S.W. Pacific Highway, which shares the private roadway with Tigard Act III Theaters. Our tenant is the Westside Dance Academy. We attended the neighborhood informational meeting held ( 1 February 18, 1998. Act III Theaters has performed responsibly in all previous expansions. We support Act III Theater's proposal, but are concerned that the private roadway is operating beyond capacity. Our objective is to preserve our schools' unrestricted access to the roadway for arrival & departure, and provide for the safety of children and parents. In a 1995 Staff Report, the Tigard Planning Department indicated that the private roadway is already overburdened and very congested, and required that Tri-Met develop the easement to S.W. 72nd Avenue. Regretfully, Tri-Met was successful in avoiding that requirement. Complete blockage of our only property access now regularly occurs at peak hours, negatively affecting our school operations and creating a safety hazard for enrolled children, parents, and staff. We strongly advocate acceptance of Act III Theater's proposed design to open a minimum of two additional access driveways onto S.W. 72nd Avenue. We believe these added driveways are necessary to reduce the pressure on the private roadway. We respectfully request that Act III Theaters provide additional traffic control on the private roadway. We suggest, for example, a cross-walk with stop signs be installed at the roadway junction of our property access, plus re-striping the roadway lanes to improve northbound traffic flow. Additional signing for slowing and stopping southbound traffic is also recommended. Thank you for your consideration. Please call me if I can be of any assistance. TIOsincerely, J4D. Webber, MD STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-1268 Phone(503)224-3380 Fax(503)220-2480 TDD(503)221-1045 Internet:www.stoel.com November 23, 1998 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Dial (503) 294-9194 email mcrobinson@stoel.com VIA MESSENGER Mr. Mark Roberts Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Application by Eastgate Theatre, Inc. for Site Development Review Approval of Tigard Cinemas Dear Mr. Roberts: This law firm represents Eastgate Theater, Inc. Enclosed with this letter are the following documents: 1. An application fee check in the amount of $2,905. The application fee is calculated as follows. The first $1M of value requires a fee of $1,780. Each $10,000 in construction value above $1M requires an additional $5 in fees. The architect on this project, Thompson Vaivoda and Associates, has estimated this project's construction value at $3.25M, requiring an additional fee of $1,125, for a total of $2,905. 2. A completed and signed City of Tigard application form by the two property owners, Tom Moyer Theaters and Phyllis K. Stewart. 3. Twenty four (24) copies of the narrative describing compliance with the applicable approval criteria. 4. Twenty four (24) folded copies of the required site plans. PDX 1 A-152133.1 99999-0006 SEATTLE PORTLAND VANCOUVER,WA BOISE SALT LAKE CITY WASHINGTON,D.C. f STOEL RIVES LLP Mr. Mark Roberts November 23, 1998 Page 2 5. Ten (10) copies of the traffic impact study prepared by Kittelson and Associates plus one (1) unbound copy of the transportation impact study for copying purposes. The applicant has held the required pre-application meeting with the City. The applicant held the required neighborhood meeting on February 7, 1998. Please provide me with copies of any written testimony received concerning this application, copies of any staff reports for this application, and a copy of the Director's decision on this application. I understand that this application is processed as a Director's decision with an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission. Please provide me with a copy of your letter reviewing the application's completeness. I will be happy to forward to you any additional information required to make the application complete pursuant to ORS 227.178(3). Very truly yours, M, C Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc Enclosures cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via U.S. Mail) (w/encl.) Mr. David Gellows (via U.S. Mail) (w/encl.) Mr. Allan Norris (via U.S. Mail) (w/encl.) Ms. Julia Kuhn (via U.S. Mail) (w/encl.) Mr. Don Maltase (via U.S. Mail) (w/encl.) PDX 1 A-152133.1 99999-0006 CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping f7(Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS =7/27/99 FILE NO(S).: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR] 98-0025 FILE TITLE: ACT III THEATER EXPANSION APPLICANT: Eastgate Theater, Inc. APPLICANT'S REP:: Mike Robinson & Steven Pfeiffer Contact: Tim Reed Stoel Rives LLP 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 497-0111 (503) 294-9194 OWNERS: Tom Moyer Theaters Phyllis Stewart 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 900 do Mr. Don Maltase Portland, OR 97205 C&R Real Estate Services 1440 SW Taylor Portland, OR 97205 REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72�d Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 0500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: APRIL2,1999 DUE: ApriI12,1999 X STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: THURSDAY - MAY 13,1999 HEARINGS OFFICER [MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME:1:OOPM PLANNING COMMISSION [MONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:1:30 PM CITY COUNCIL ITUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:1:30 PM PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X SITE PLAN X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY X ARBORIST REPORT X GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner, (503) 639-4171 Ext. 407 SDR 98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION LAND USE PROPOSAL 12/18/98 13:02 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0001 ..##$$#8$&$*...k.}..}..k.}.E..f..}..g.i,}* *** ACTIVITY REPORT Y•£4• *********1' '8.. .}.,}..}...,E. ..},.t....}..}..}.y. . TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 0788 CONNECTION TEL 222 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/18 13:01 USAGE TIME 01'01 PAGES 2 RESULT OK Post-it®Fax Note 7671 Date�a /8- pages Z r l To62 Fr On>~ From 37/1!Q hiw‘chi k, Co./Dept- . '. Co.December 11, 1998 Phone N AND, 7,‘9,4,-„/ OF Phone `,/ 3 ' - 7/ x . Fax#,24/3_ ,2_ p Fax )REGON Eastgate Theater, Inc. Attention: Tim Reed 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 — Portland, OR 97205 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/SDR 98-0025 Dear Mr. Reed: This letter is in response to the recent application that has been made to add six (6) screens to the existing 11 screen theater. This application has been considered to be incomplete pending submittal of the following additional information and/or plan revisions: 1. Certain plan sheets do not match other plan sheets. The Conceptual Site Plan and Site Plan show a proposed driveway system being extended to the westerly property line. The Landscape Plan, Grading/Erosion Control Plan and Composite Utility Plan do not show this extension. We recommend that this extension be shown on each plan sheet; 2. Provide 24 sets of preliminary sizing calculations for the proposed water quality facilities; 3. Provide 24 sets of an arborist report and mitigation plan for trees over 12 inches in diameter that are proposed to be removed; and 4. Provide 24 sets of an addendum to the applicant's narrative and/or the plan December 11, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Eastgate Theater, Inc. Attention: Tim Reed 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/SDR 98-0025 Dear Mr. Reed: This letter is in response to the recent application that has been made to add six (6) screens to the existing 11 screen theater. This application has been considered to be incomplete pending submittal of the following additional information and/or plan revisions: 1. Certain plan sheets do not match other plan sheets. The Conceptual Site Plan and Site Plan show a proposed driveway system being extended to the westerly property line. The Landscape Plan, Grading/Erosion Control Plan and Composite Utility Plan do not show this extension. We recommend that this extension be shown on each plan sheet; 2. Provide 24 sets of preliminary sizing calculations for the proposed water quality facilities; 3. Provide 24 sets of an arborist report and mitigation plan for trees over 12 inches in diameter that are proposed to be removed; and 4. Provide 24 sets of an addendum to the applicant's narrative and/or the plan sheets that address if a parking lot driveway connection between the adjoining McDonald's site and the subject property is or is not possible. During the Preapplication Conferences we had discussed that if the Tri-County Shopping Center does not go forward with construction at this time, that adequate transportation facilities were not available at the SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue intersection. This existing problem has been confirmed by the traffic study submitted for this project. Because an adequate level of service is presently not available and improvements to the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection are not listed in the Capital Improvement Program funding prioritization, the City will have to recommend denial of the proposed theater expansion. This project is untimely until such time as the needed improvements have been made. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 -age 1 a 2 The private street system that has been shown on some of the proposed plan sheets has not been designed to be in an alignment that would match SW Atlanta Street. For this reason, the proposed project design does not appear to adequately address planned street connectivity requirements in this area. My last day with the City is today, therefore, this project has been reassigned to Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner. Please feel free to contact her concerning this information at (503) 639-4171 x407. Sincerely, //(,e1(, Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP I:lcurpinlmarkrlletterslactl I I.doc c: SDR 98-0025 Land use file Michael Robinson Bill Monahan Jim Hendryx Dick Bewersdorff 12/11/98 Tim Reed, Eastgate Theater Ltr. Page 2 of 2 Re: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal for SDR 98-0025/Act III Theaters DEC-1T-98 10:26 FROM-STOEL RIVE' 503-220-2480 T-066 P 01/02 F-382 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2300 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204.1268 Telephone (5031 223-3380 Fax(503)22a-2460 Name: - Fax No. Company/Firm: Office No. TO: . Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 � e6� Dick Bewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Dave Gellos 225-0803 Thompsen Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Tim Reed 503-497-0106 Regal Cinemas 503-497-0111 — - Name: Sender's Direct Dial:- ---- — FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: 21097 Matter: DATE: December 17, 1998 No, Of Pages (including this cover): 2- Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: First Class Mail l- ] Overnight Delivery - Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege- I j.the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you COMMENTS: See attached. ?DX1A-148315.1 99999.000i EEC-1T-98 10:27 FROM-STOEL RIVF" 503-220-2480 T-066 P.02/02 F-382 STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O K N E V S 5IANO.RD INSURAN(b gtr.I ER 900SW ttr'fIi AVENL:2.SUITE 2aU PORTLAND.UKe�:VN 9,111s•i2oA Pna.t<(5u3)22e. I) fn.L(403)22U-201.) TDD(5u3/Z2I-IU*: Internet ,.rri.eto:l..orn December 17, 1.998 MICHAEL C ROBINSON Direct Dial (503) 294-9194 cm3E1 nutubtn,uu@itoe1 corn VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR. 97223 Re: Meeting Dear Julia: 1 am writing to confirm our meeting scheduled today at your office with Dick at 1:30 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss Mark Robert's letter of incompleteness concerning the Act III application. Very truly yours, Halal e Michael C. Robinson MCR:ij cc: Mr. Dick Bewersdorff (via facsimile) Mr. Allan Norris (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facsimile) Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) PDX1A-15512I6 1 99519940006 SEATTLE YUKI Let NL•• Vw■•'c•uvKA.WA BOISE SALT LAKE CITY W.:411 NC Ova.0 C DEC-23-98 17:35 FROM-STOEl RIVE' T-682 P.01/04 F-798 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2300 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-1266 fri pnvac (5'3)224-3380 Fax 1503)220-2480 Name: Fax Nu. Company/Firm: Office No. TO: Dick BewersdortT 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Tim Reed 503-497-0106 Regal Cinemas 503-497-0111 Dave Gellos 225-0803 Thompsen Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 - ---- - - - — - r - -- --- - - - - Client: Matter: - - - — — DATE: December 22, 1998 No. of Pages (including this cover):ri Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: — First Class Mail ! Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. if the reader of this message is nor rile intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by marl. Thank you. COMMENTS; Please see attached. PDx I A-144974.1 99999-0001 DEC-23-98 17:36 FROM-STOEL RIVE° T-682 P.02/04 F-798 STOEL RIVES LIP A l TOR N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW METH AVENUE,SLIM 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 9720!-116u Paunc(503)Z243b40 Fat(90)120-2400 TDD(501)221.1Pt5 Wanes ....—stud mm December 23, 1998 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Dial (503) 294-9194 MEd mcrubmson@stoel.con► VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Dick Bewersdorff City of Tigard Community Development Department - 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Site Design Review Application by Act III Theatres Dear Dick: I am writing to confirm the results of our meeting on December 17 concerning the status of this application. 1. Signalization at the Intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and Dartmouth Avenue. Mark Roberts' letter of incompleteness concluded that Act III must provide for satisfactory levels of service at this intersection because the Tri-County Center has not undertaken the required improvements. Assuming that the applicable approval criteria for this application require appropriate levels of service on city streets, I told you that my client would be willing to provide the required signalization if other projects that are conditioned to provide signalization and are under construction will be required to participate in the project. My concern is that Act III not be required to fully fund the signal if other projects conditioned to provide for the signal are underway. I suggest that we prepare an appropriate condition of approval to accomplish this goal. I will also suggest to my client that he petition the Tigard City Council to establish a "latecomers" ordinance for other projects benefitted by a signal at this intersection. 2. Conpecgvily Requirements. Mark's letter of incompleteness noted only that the driveways were not properly aligned with the future locations of Atlanta Street to the east and west of this project. I will P D X 1 A-15582 6 1 999910006 Ss 77th Por11.Kn V.ncouvEL WA Eorss 5.1T LA 7 OT7 W.s"YNCTON,0 C JEC-23-96 17:36 FROM-STOEL RIVF- T-682 P 03/04 F-798 STOEL RIVES LL' Mr. Dick Bewersdorff December 23, 1998 Page 2 ask TVA Architects CO revise the site plan to show the future location of Atlanta Street to the east and west of the site. The absence of any statement in Mark's letter regarding this method of satisfying Tigard Community Development Code (-TCDC") Sections 18.67.070(G) and 18.164.030(A)(1)(b) and (E) suggest that these sections are satisfied by the driveway connections across this site. As you know, the existing Act III Theatre relies on parking across which public streets would pass. Requiring Act III to obtain its lessor's consent to dedication of an easement or fee to the public would mean the end of this project. Moreover, it would certainly raise the issue of a taking under the requirements of Dolan v. City of Tigard. Further, based on my earlier conversations with you and Jim Hendryx, I believe we all agree that the driveway connections, as long as they are open to the public 24 hours per day, serve the purpose of connectivity as required by the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines without the necessity of a fee or easement dedication to the public or the City of Tigard. Because the driveways apparently satisfy the connectivity requirements, the other requirements of Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines can also be found to be satisfied as explained in the application. I agreed to revise the application to include the issues contained in Mark's letter of incompleteness and submit a revised application package to you I would appreciate Julia letting me know whether there are other issues that require additional argument or evidence. Finally, I will calculate the number of parking spaces that might be lost in the event the City ever purchases or condemns the driveways for public streets. I believe we can confirm that the reciprocal parking that has been with Tri-Met would satisfy the code requirement as it will then exist under the new parking limitations. Nothing in this letter should be understood to agree to any sort of a taking or dedication of property to the public notwithstanding that my client will allow 24-hour public use of the private driveways. Thank you very much for your assistance with this matter. Very truly yours, 14,h9, Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facsimile) Mr. Allan Norris (via facsimile) PDX1A-155FLa 1 -argon DEC-23-98 17:37 FROM-STOEL RIVF' T-682 P.04/04 F-798 STOEL RIVES LLP Mr. Dick Bewersdorff December 23, 1998 Page 3 Ms. Julia Hajduk (via facsimile) PDX1w-153Ze 1 9999911006 03-r0-99 17:09 FROM- T-956 P 01/02 F-566 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2300 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-1268 Telephone (503)224-3380 Fax(503)220-2480 Name: Fax No. Company/firm: Office No. TO: Tim Reed 503-497-0106 Regal Cinemas 503-497-0111 Dave Gellos 225-0803 Thompsen Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Brady Berry 526-0775 W&H Pacific 626-0455 Julia HFj duk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: 21097 ` Matter: _ - DATE: March 10, 1999 No. Of Pages (including this cover): Z Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: + ■ First Class Mail ', Overnight Delivery 7 Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: See attached. PDX 1 A-148315.1 99999-0001 • 03-10-99 17:09 FROM- T-956 P 02/02 F-566 STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 W FIFTH Av FNUE.SUITE 2600 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-226+5 Phan 1503)224.3380 Fur(R137220-2486 TDD(iO3)221-T045 lnumcz.Www..to.3-cu1r, March 10, 1999 MICHAEL C. ROBINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinson @stoel.com VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Tim Reed Regal Cinemas 10032 Robin Oaks Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 Re: Tigard Cinemas Application Dear Tim: I have submitted the additional information to the City of Tigard to make the application complete_ I will check with Julia in the next few days to make sure she has everything she needs. Once the Planning Director deems the application complete, Julie will prepare a staff report in the next four to six weeks. I will check periodically with Julia to make sure there are no issues that would result in denial of the application or an imposition of unacceptable conditions of approval. Once the application is approved, there is a fourteen-day appeal period to the Planning Commission. If no appeals are filed, the decision will become final. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, C. / Michael C. Robinson MCR:IPC cc: Mr. Alan Norris (via facsimile) Mr. Dave Gellos (via facsimile) Mr. Brady Berry (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Kuhn (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer PDX 1A-165312.1 9999911001 SE+TTLP PORTL..ND V.NCOJVL[c.WA BOISE S+LT LAKE CITY WAb i TON,D.C. STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-1268 Phone(503)224-3380 Fax(5031220-2480 TDD(503)221-1045 Internet:www.stoel.com March 10, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinson @stoel.com VIA MESSENGER Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Site Design Review Application by Eastgate Theatre, Inc. Dear Julia: Please find enclosed twenty-four (24) copies of a revised narrative addressing the applicable approval criteria and twenty-four (24) sets of the revised site plan. The revised narrative contains the information requested in the City December 11, 1998 letter determining the application to be incomplete. The plan sheets have been revised to match one another. (Item 1 of incompleteness letter.) 1. A vehicular connection between the Tri-Met parking lot and the McDonald's parking lot is not possible because of the significant grade change (an increase in elevation from 235 feet to 250 feet) and because the connection would cross a water quality feature on the McDonald's property. (Item 4 of incompleteness letter.) 2. Only one (1) tree over twelve (12) inches in diameter is to be removed from this site. The applicant will comply with TCDC 18.150.070(E) by paying a fee to the City for removal of the tree. (Item 3 of incompleteness letter.) 3. The revised narrative includes water quality feature calculations from W&H Pacific. (Item 2 of incompleteness letter.) PDX 1 A-156417.1 99999-0006 SEATTLE PORTLAND VANCOUVER,WA BOISE SALT LAKE CITY WASHINGTON,D.C. STOEL RIVES Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner March 10, 1999 Page 2 4. The revised narrative includes a copy of the reciprocal parking easement between the theatre and Tri-Met as Exhibit 12. The Tri-Met parking lot contains 208 parking spaces. 5. The revised narrative includes an analysis by Thompson Vaivoda Architects of parking spaces that would be lost in the event the City provides for public street connections across the theatre parking lot. A total of 160 parking spaces would be lost, leaving a total of 864 parking spaces. More than enough parking spaces will be provided on-site and off-site to compensate for the loss of any parking spaces. 6. The parking spaces on the Tri-Met parking lot may be utilized by Eastgate pursuant to Tigard Community Development Code ("TCDC") section 18.106.020(H)(2)(a). Mr. Bewersdorff confirmed in a telephone conversation with me that as long as least one of the parking spaces within the Tri-Met parking lot is within the required three hundred (300) feet of the theatre site, that all of the parking spaces in the Tri-Met parking lot may be counted under this provision. TCDC section 18.106.020.(H)(2)(a) allows shared parking areas for commercial uses requiring more than forty (40)parking spaces up to three hundred(300)feet from the use. TCDC section 18.106.020(H)(2)(a) allows shared parking when the peak hours do not overlap. The theatre's peak hours are in the evening and on week-ends. The Tri-Met parking lot's peak hours are on week-day mornings and afternoons. 7. The site plan has been revised to show all of the information as requested in Mr. Roberts' December 11, 1998 letter of incompleteness. 8. The revised site plan shows proposed Atlanta Street to the east and west of this site. The Baby's R Us proposed Atlanta Street connection is located south of the street's location on the theatre site. If Atlanta Street were to be continued east from the Baby's R Us location, it would pass through the theatre building. It is not possible to match the street alignment shown in the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines. 9. The applicant proposes to use the driveway aisles to meet the Atlanta Street connectivity requirements. Based on the Baby's R Us proposed Atlanta Street location and upon the fact that the Atlanta Street intersection with Dartmouth Avenue is constrained by a median, there is no reason to require a significant change to the applicant's plans to meet this connectivity requirement. It is apparent the Atlanta Street cannot fill its collector function because of the curvature required for the street and because of the median in Dartmouth Avenue at its intersection with Atlanta Street. PDX 1 A-156417.1 99999-0006 STOEL RIVES LIP Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner March 10, 1999 Page 3 10. My December 23, 1998 letter to Dick Bewersdorff confirmed that the applicant will provide for a traffic signal at SW 72"d Avenue and Dartmouth Avene "if other projects that are conditioned to provide signalization and are under construction will be required to participate in the project." Please provide me a letter confirming that this additional information makes this application complete. Also, please call me if you discover any issues that require resolution before the Director can approve this application or if you receive any adverse comments from other public agencies or City departments. If you need additional information beyond that provided, please let me know as soon as possible. Very truly yours, V,JM&Q 6 P-414"., Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc Enclosures cc: Mr. Tim Reed (w/encls.) Mr. David Gellos (w/encls.) Mr. Allan Norris (w/encls.) Mr. Brady Berry (w/encls.) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer (w/encls.) PDX 1 A-156417.1 99999-0006 The Efficient One Tag No. Invoice No. Illei WESTERN FLASH DELIVERY 39171,9 7620 NE Killingsworth,Suite 200 Date Portland,OR 97218 J f / 5. "RUSH MESSENGER SERVICE" (503)254-3334 Dover: , S Account No. FROM SENDER 3023 From:Company Name Telephone )EL RIVES ET AL (503) 224-3380 Address 900 SW 5TH AVE, #2300 City State ZIP PORTLAND OR 97204 TO RECEIVER To:(From)Company Name Telephone 7 ' i' 1 ',' .) Address . r ` i S till /-1� L 4- City ! , (7; r , 0,Z 1722 No.Pieces `Y y DDeeed tic s peonatA Weight SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Charge To: Rush Sender L1 L RECEIVED- Route Receiver ill b_i MAR 11 1999 Other COMMUNITY DEVELOPMt)r,; ❑ ENT.❑ BILLING INFORMATION • p(ytry, Wart Time Wailing Charge / <4 / 7 - < mac` AiteA- Load/Unload Time Unloading Charte AVMs Freight Charge Extra Stop Charge P/U Time felt" Sub Total Del.Charge otal Charge AM PM AM - PM — Sender Signature Receiver Signature 03-25-99 13:36 FROM-STOEL RIVE' 503-220-2480 T-774 P.01/02 F-758 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 23011 PORTLAND.OREGON Sr7204-1268 2ckpfone(503)224-3380 Au (503)220-2480 _ Name; - - — Fax No. Company/Firm: Office No. — TO: Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Brian Rager Tim Reed 503-497-0106 Regal Cinemas S03-497-0111 Allan Norris 225-0803 Thompsen Vaivoda 220-0668 Julia Kuhn 273-8169 Kittelson & Associates Brian Rager City of Tigard 639-4171 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: _ FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: 21097 Matter: 6 DATE: March 25, 1999 No. Of Pages (including this cover): Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: I First Class Mad Overnight Delivery l 7 Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidennal information that is protected by the arrorney-client or work product privilege. 4f the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by marl. Thank you. COMMENTS: See attached. PDX1A-148315 1 999990001 03-25-99 13:36 FROM-STOEL RIVr" 503-220-2480 T-774 P.02/02 F-759 STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 Sw FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE 2600 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-12e6 Pnone(503 22&-331O fax 1503)220.2480 TAP 150.1)222-/L45 lrucrnor,.rte goal coin March 25, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Drat (503)294-9194 email 1ne robinson@slocl.c om VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Act III Cinemas Application Dear Julia: I talked to Brian on Wednesday, March 24. Brian confirmed that he has all of the information that he requested. You received this application on March 11, 1999. Please send me a letter confirming that the additional information satisfied the city's letter of incompleteness. Very truly yours, MW C- Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. Allen Norris (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Kuhn (via facsimile) Mr. Brian Rager (via facsimile) PDX1A-167497 1 99999-0006 SIATTLIG 1 O T1.+ND V.NCOV ER,WA Soise 9...S LnacL Carr W.YItINCTON,D C CITY OF TIGARD March 30, 1999 OREGON Tim Reed Eastgate Theater, Inc. 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 Re: Notice of Complete Application Submittal/SDR 98-0025 Dear Mr. Reed: The City has received the additional submittal items requested in the December 11, 1998 letter of incompleteness. Staff has reviewed the additional information and finds that it is sufficient to deem that application complete and begin the review process. A tentative decision date of May 13, 1999 has been scheduled. Please be aware, however, that this date may change. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171 extension 407. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajdt�k Associate Planner i:\curpin\Julia\SDR\actIllaccept21.doc c: SDR 98-0025 Land use file Michael Robinson, 500 SW Fifth, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97204 Bill Monahan Jim Hendryx Dick Bewersdorff 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 14-02-99 11:47 FROM-STOEL RIVE° 503-220-2480 T-247 P.01/03 F-124 STOEL RIVES UT ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 9720¢1268 TekpW4c(5Q3)224-3380 Fax (50)220-2480 Name: Fax Nu. Company/Firm: Office No. TO: Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Tim Reed 702-254-1465 Regal Cinemas 702-254-1429 Dave Gellos 225-0803 Thompson Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Julia Kuhn 273-8169 Kittelson & Associates Brady Berry 526-0775 W&H Pacific 626-0455 Don Maltase 224-9554 C & R Real Estate 2244267 Services Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Matter: DATE: April 2, 1999 No, of Pages (including this cover): Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: First Class Mail Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, non,jy us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. 04-02-99 11:48 FROM-STOEL RIVF" 503-220-2480 T-247 P.02/03 F-124 STOEL RIVES L!-P A T 1 O R N 8 Y S STiND4RD 1N5URANCE CENTu. Y00 5W FIFTH AVENUE,SOITE 2e0u PORT44ND,OREGON 7724-1208 Pho (503)Z24-33b0 Fa4(503)220-2s60 TDD (503)221-1145 !Merrier NYAN.srael.COM April 2, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 crud mcrobulson@s oel corn VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File No. SDR 98-0025; Tigard Cinemas Dear Julia: I am writing to confirm our conversation of Wednesday, March 30. The three tax lots that comprise this application are as follows: • Tax Lot 1S136DB 02600 • Tax Lot 1S136DB 02602 • Tax Lot 1S136DC 0500 The Tri-Met parking lot is Tax Lot 1S136DB02603. Although the applicant is relying on the Tri-Met parking lot to meet its parking requirements see Exhibit 12 to March 11, 1999 submittal), the Tri-Met parking lot is not part of the application. PDX 1 A-148329.1 99995-0006 SE.TTJ.E Pox(LAND VI.NCOu LR,WA DOWe SAM'LALV41 CITY •gouncror.P C 04-02-99 11 :48 FROM-STOEL RP' 503-220-2480 T-247 P 03/03 F-124 STOEL RIVES Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner April 2, 1999 Page 2 I also want to confirm that you received the information necessary to make the application complete, as requested by the City's December 11, 1998, letter, on March 11, 1999. Pursuant to ORS 227.178(3), the 120-day period began to run on March 11, 1999, the date that the applicant submitted the requested additional information. If you find yourself running short of time, please call me and I will speak to my client about an extension of the 120-day provision. Finally, please call me if you identify any substantive issues that would prevent approval of this application. I would appreciate the chance to resolve those issues with you prior to the issuance of a Director's decision. Very truly yours, C - �Q-< Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. Allan Norris (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Kuhn (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facisimle) Mr. Brady Berry (via facsimile) Mr. Don Maltase (via facsimile) Mr. Stephen L. Pfeiffer PDX 1 A-166329 1 99999-W06 gewposal/Alarraive APPLICATION BY EASTGATE THEATRE, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PURSUANT TO TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 18.120 ON A SITE CONTAINING 14.58 ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SW 72ND AVENUE AND STATE HIGHWAY 99W IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ("GC") ZONING DISTRICT SUBMITTED TO THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON NOVEMBER 23, 1998 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON MARCH 10, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Summary of Application Information 1 1. Property Owners. 1 2. Applicant 1 3. Applicant's Representatives. 1 4. Site Size, Comprehensive Plan Map Designation and Zoning Map Designation 2 B. Site Description 2 C. Surrounding Land Uses, Comprehensive Plan Map Designations and Zoning Map Designations. 2 D. Preapplication Meeting and Neighborhood Meeting 3 E. Summary of Issues 3 1. Street Extensions 3 a. TCDC Section 18.164.030(D)(1) does not require these streets to be dedicated, constructed or areas left for their dedication. 4 b. The City may not require dedication or reservation of right-of- way for the streets. 6 2. Applicability of Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Policies. 6 F. Description of Existing and Proposed Improvements 6 G. Status of Application 7 II. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA 8 A. Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines 8 1. Summary. 8 2. TCDC Section 18.67.070(A). 8 3. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(1). 8 4. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(2). 9 5. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(3). 9 6. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(4). 9 7. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(5). 9 8. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(1). 9 9. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(2). 10 10. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(3). 10 11. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(4). 10 12. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(5). 10 13. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(6). 10 14. TCDC Section 18.67.070(D)(2)-(4) 11 15. TCDC Section 18.67.070(E). 11 PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 16. TCDC Section 18.67.070(F). 11 17. Conclusion 11 B. Site Development Review 11 1. TCDC 18.120.020, "Applicability of Provisions". 11 2. TCDC 18.120.030, "Administration and Approval Process". 12 3. TCDC 18.120.050, "Phased Development". 12 4. TCDC 18.120.090, "Application Submission Requirements". 12 5. TCDC 18.120.110, "Site Conditions"; TCDC 18.120.120, "The Site Development Plan"; TCDC 18.120.130, "The Grading Plan"; TCDC 18.120.140, "Architectural Drawings"; TCDC 18.120.150, "Landscape Plan"; and TCDC 18.120.160, "Sign Drawings" 12 6. TCDC 18.120.180, "Approval Standards". 13 a. TCDC Chapter 18.84, "Sensitive Lands". 13 b. TCDC Chapter 18.94, "Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations". 13 c. TCDC Chapter 18.92, "Density Computation". 13 d. TCDC Chapter 18.144, "Accessory Use and Structures". 13 e. TCDC Chapter 18.96, "Additional Yard Area Requirements" 13 f. TCDC Chapter 18.98, "Building Height Limitations: Exceptions" 14 g. TCDC Chapter 18.100, "Landscaping and Screening" 14 h. TCDC Chapter 18.102, "Visual Clearance Areas". 14 i. TCDC Chapter 18.106, "Off-Street Parking and Loading". . 14 j. TCDC Chapter 18.108, "Access, Egress and Circulation". . 15 k. TCDC Chapter 18.114, "Signs". 16 1. TCDC Chapter 18.150, "Tree Removal". 16 m. TCDC Chapter 18.164, "Street and Utility Improvement Standards". 16 n. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(2), "Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment". 16 o. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(3), "Exterior Elevations". 17 p. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(4), "Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses". 17 q. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(5), "Privacy and Noise". 17 r. TCDC Sections 18.120.180(A)(6) and (7), "Private Outdoor and Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use" 17 s. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(8). 17 t. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(9), "Demarcation of Public, Semi- Public and Private Spaces: Crime Prevention" 18 PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 11 Page u. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(10), "Crime Prevention and Safety" 18 v. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(11), "Access and Circulation" 18 w. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(12), "Public Transit". 18 x. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(13), "Parking". 18 y. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(14), "Landscaping". 19 z. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(15), "Drainage". 19 aa. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(16), "Provision for the Handicapped" 19 bb. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(17), "Signs" 19 cc. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(18) 19 dd. TCDC Section 18.62.060, "Additional Requirements". 20 C. "Impact Study", TCDC Section 18.32.050(5). 20 1. Transportation System Including Bikeways 20 2. Water and Sewer System 20 3. Noise Impact 20 4. Park System. 20 III. CONCLUSION 21 PDXIA-128923.1 25180-0006 iii I. INTRODUCTION A. Summary of Application Information. 1. Property Owners. • Tom Moyer Theatres, an Oregon partnership 1000 SW Broadway, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 Telephone: (503) 241-1111 • Phyllis T. Stewart c/o Mr. Don Maltase C&R Real Estate Services Portland, OR 97205 Telephone: (503) 224-9554 2. Applicant. • Eastgate Theatre, Inc. Contact: Tim Reed 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 Telephone: (503) 497-0111 3. Applicant's Representatives. • Michael C. Robinson and Steven L. Pfeiffer Stoel Rives LLP 500 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2300 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 294-9194 Facsimile: (503) 220-2480 • David Gellos Thompson Vaivoda & Associates Architects 1010 SW 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97205 Telephone: (503) 220-0668 Facsimile: (503) 225-0803 PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 1 of 21 • Julia Kuhn and Mark Vandehey, P.E. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 Telephone: (503) 228-5230 Facsimile: (503) 273-8169 • Mr. Brady Berry, P.E. W&H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008-7120 Telephone: (503) 626-0455 Facsimile: (503) 526-0775 4. Site Size, Comprehensive Plan Map Designation and Zoning Map Designation. • Site size: 14.58 acres • Comprehensive Plan map designation: "General Commercial" • Zoning map designation: General Commercial ("CG"). B. Site Description. The site slopes generally east to west, with an approximate 13-foot vertical transition from the eastern portion of the site to the driveway on SW 72nd Avenue. The existing Tigard Cinemas and its parking lot are bounded on the north by a densely vegetated drainage ditch. This ditch is subject to the Water Resources ("WR") overlay zoning district. No changes to the ditch are proposed by this application. The project site is located southwest of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and State Highway 99W. (Exhibit 1.) The project site contains the existing eleven (11) screen Tigard Cinemas. C. Surrounding Land Uses, Comprehensive Plan Map Designations and Zoning Map Designations. To the northeast of this site along State Highway 99W is a McDonald's restaurant (located at the southwest intersection of State Highway 99W and SW 72nd Avenue). PDX1A-128923.1 2s180-0006 Page 2 of 21 The site is bounded on the east by SW 72nd Avenue, a major arterial. To the south of the site is a Club Foods store. To the west of the site is an undeveloped parcel and a dance school. All of the surrounding properties are designated "General Commercial" on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") map. All of the surrounding properties are zoned General Commercial ("GC"). The site and the surrounding area are subject to the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines ("Guidelines"). D. Preapplication Meeting and Neighborhood Meeting. The applicant met with staff in a preapplication meeting on November 18, 1997. (Exhibit 4). The applicant held subsequent meetings with the City in March and May, 1998. Pursuant to a telephone conversation with Mr. Bewersdorff of the City of Tigard Community Development Department, the City will not require an additional pre-application meeting. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on February 7, 1998. (Exhibit 5). E. Summary of Issues. 1. Street Extensions. The Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines are applicable to this application because this site is located within the Tigard Triangle. TCDC Section 18.67.070(G), "Street and Accessway Standards," provides: "The following tables and diagrams show street and pedestrian accessways standards for the Tigard Triangle. Landscape and street design details were also included in this section." The map entitled "Tigard Triangle Street Plan" is made applicable to this application by TCDC Sections 18.67.070 and 18.164.030(D)(1). The Tigard Triangle Street Plan shows two streets located on this site. The first street is an east-west minor arterial street with a 60-foot wide right-of-way. The location of the minor arterial places it immediately to the north of the existing Tigard Cinemas building and separates virtually all of the theater's off-street parking from the building. A 60-foot right-of-way is not shown in the Tigard Triangle Street Plan street sections but presumably includes at least two travel lanes, two bike lanes and two sidewalks. The second road is a "backage" road connecting the minor arterial with SW 72nd Avenue. This road contains a 60-foot wide right-of-way with two travel lanes and two parking lanes. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 3 of 21 This section of the application explains why this application is not required to dedicate right-of-way to the City of Tigard ("City") for these two streets, to make improvements for the two streets or to establish "setback" areas for the two streets. Notwithstanding this position, the application's site plan (Exhibit 2) shows that driveway connections within the site will be provided to follow the Tigard Street Plan street locations. Eastgate will allow the public to have 24-hour use of these driveways, thus providing for vehicular and pedestrian connections through the driveways and providing for public street connections at the points shown on the Tigard Triangle Street Plan. The CG zoning district's dimensional requirements do not require setbacks for nonexistent street rights-of-way. TCDC Section 18.62.050(A). The Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines do not impose setback requirements for nonexistent street rights-of-way. TCDC Section 18.67.070. Finally, the definition of "setback" in TCDC Section 18.26.030 provides that a setback is measured from a "property line unless otherwise stated * * *." No property lines exist where the proposed streets are shown on the Tigard Street Plan. a. TCDC Section 18.164.030(D)(1) does not require these streets to be dedicated, constructed or areas left for their dedication. TCDC Section 18.164.030(D)(1) provides: "The location, width and grade of all streets shall conform to an approve street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing plan streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets." The Planning Director ("Director") can find that these streets should not be required because of their relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by the streets. The requirement in TCDC Section 18.64.030(D)(1) that: ... "all streets shall conform to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation ... to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets" requires the Director to make a site specific determination as to whether these streets shall be required. Requiring these streets would significantly impact the use of this site, specifically the relationship between the theater and its parking lot. The minor arterial would separate the majority of the parking spaces from the theater. The backage road would provide a further barrier to the theatre. The minor arterial, according to the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines, is intended to provide access to Triangle Destinations, to distribute traffic within the Triangle, to provide connections between districts and to distribute traffic from arterials and collector streets to local service streets. This function does not include providing access to a particular site. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 4 of 21 The east-west minor arterial is unnecessary to serve this site's transportation needs. The traffic impact study prepared by Kittelson & Associates shows that existing City streets can provide adequate access to this site. (Exhibit 3). Additionally, TCDC Section 18.164.030(E)(1)(b) allows the Director to determine that the roads are unnecessary. This section provides: "Improvements to streets shall be made according to adopted City standards, unless the approval authority determines that the standards will result in an unacceptable adverse impact to existing development or on the proposed development or on natural features such as wetlands, steep slopes or existing mature trees. In approving an exception to the standards, the approval authority shall determine that the potential adverse impacts succeed the public benefits of the standards. In evaluating the public benefits, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in sub-paragraph "a" above." The Director can find that improvement of these two streets pursuant to the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines will result in an unacceptable adverse impact to the existing Tigard Cinemas and its proposed expansion. The unacceptable adverse impact is a separation of the majority of the theater's parking spaces from the theater by a backage road and a minor arterial, both of which are intended to carry through traffic rather than to serve this site's traffic. Applying the criteria in TCDC Section 18.164.030(E)(a)(I)-(xi), the Director can find that the streets should not be improved. Subsection (a)(ii) requires the Director to consider anticipated traffic generation. The anticipated traffic generation served by these roads is not from this site, but from surrounding areas and State Highway 99W. The Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines describes the function of minor arterials as, among other things, to distribute traffic from arterials and collector streets to local service streets. This function has nothing to do with serving the traffic generation of the Tigard Cinemas. Subsection (a)(iii) is on-street parking needs. No on-street parking is necessary for these roads to serve this site. The application will provide adequate parking pursuant to TCDC Chapter 18.106. Subsection (a)(x) is safety for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Pedestrian safety will not be enhanced by requiring most of the customers of Tigard Cinemas to cross two busy streets, especially considering that many of the customers will do so at night when the theater does most of its business. For these reasons, the Planning Director can find that the streets are not required for this application. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 5 of 21 b. The City may not require dedication or reservation of right-of- way for the streets. If the Director determines that the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines require either dedication or reservation of area through "setbacks," this determination is a taking that is subject to the requirements of Dolan v. City of Tigard. Dolan requires that conditions of approval be roughly proportional to the impacts of an application. If the Director requires that right-of-way be reserved or dedicated for these streets, the City of Tigard has the burden to show that the impact of this application requires such right-of-way dedication or reservation. In this case, no substantial evidence demonstrates that the expansion of the Tigard Cinemas requires either the minor arterial or the backage street to be dedicated, reserved or otherwise improved on this site. 2. Applicability of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Policies. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") is not applicable to this application for several reasons. First, TCDC section 18.10.010(A) provides: "Each development and use application and other procedures initiated under this title shall be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan of the City of Tigard as implemented by this title and with applicable state and federal laws and regulations. All provisions of this title shall be construed in conformity with the adopted comprehensive plan." Unless a specific provision of the TCDC requires Plan policies to be applied, the Plan is fully implemented by the TCDC. Secondly, this application is a "limited land use decision" as defined in ORS 197.015(12)(b). Pursuant to ORS 197.195(1), because the city has not incorporated specific Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies into the TCDC, these provisions are not applicable approval criteria for this application. F. Description of Existing and Proposed Improvements. The site contains the existing 11 screen Tigard Cinemas. The existing theater contains 48,593 square feet. The eleven auditoria contain 2,739 seats. The existing Tigard Cinemas has access on the east to SW 72nd Avenue and on the north to State Highway 99W. No access exists to the west. The existing parking lot contains 829 parking spaces. The existing parking lot is on either side of the theater and between the theater and the drainage ditch to the north. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 6 of 21 The existing Tigard Cinemas building complies with the current General Commercial ("GC") zoning district setback requirements on the south. The entry to the building is to the north with emergency exits on the east, west and south. The addition expands the building to the north, leaving the entry at its current location. The theater's entry area is designed for efficient access to the theater with a single ticket booth and lobby. The proposed expansion of the Tigard Cinemas adds six (6) new auditoria and provides for a total of 3,054 theater seats in the existing eleven auditoria and six new auditoria. A total of 834 parking spaces will be provided. A new parking lot will be constructed north of the drainage ditch. The theatre will utilize the 208 parking spaces in the adjacent Tri-Met parking lot. When constructed, the TCDC required the theater to provide one (1) off-street parking space for each four (4) seats. The TCDC now requires a greater standard of one (1) off-street parking space for each three (3) seats. The existing parking lots will be altered by restriping, realigning the drive aisles and providing for new landscaped islands (see sheet C1.1). These alterations do not require additional landscaping because any nonconformity is not increased. The existing theater is a nonconforming structure pursuant to TCDC Chapter 18.132, "Nonconforming Situations." The theater is a permitted use in the CG zoning district, but its parking and landscaping do not conform to current TCDC requirements. TCDC Section 18.132.040(C)(1). TCDC Section 18.132.040(C)(1)(a) provides that a nonconforming structure can be expanded and altered as long as its nonconformity is not increased. Alteration and expansion are allowed if the nonconformity is decreased. G. Status of Application. The applicant submitted this application to City of Tigard on November 23, 1998. Pursuant to ORS 227.178(2), the City had thirty (30) days to determine whether the application was complete. The City notified the applicant on December 11, 1998 that the application was deemed incomplete for the reasons shown in Exhibit 8. Pursuant to ORS 227.178(3), the applicant has 180 days from November 23, 1998, or until May 2, 1999, to make the application complete. Included with this application is the information required in the December 11, 1998 letter. The City can determine that this application is complete as of March 10, 1999. The City has 120 days from March 10, 1999 to make a final decision on this application. Because this application was submitted prior to the effective date of the new Tigard Community Development Code, it is subject to those applicable approval criteria in effect on November 23, 1998. ORS 227.178(3). PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 7 of 21 II. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA A. Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines. 1. Summary. The Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines ("Guidelines") in TCDC Section 18.60.070 apply to all properties within the Tigard Triangle. This part of the application describes how the Guidelines are satisfied. Satisfaction of the Guidelines is based upon the assumption that the two driveways on the site in the approximate location of the proposed minor arterial and backage streets will satisfy the requirements of TCDC Section 18.67.070(G), "Street and Accessway Standards". The driveways provide for public access and will connect the minor arterial on the east and west sides of the site. The minor arterial does not presently exist on either side of this site. 2. TCDC Section 18.67.070(A). RESPONSE: This section provides that all development must satisfy one of the two options contained in this section, either the "design option" or the "performance option". This application satisfies the design option in subsection (1). Public street connections are provided at SW 72nd Avenue at intervals of no more than 660 feet. Bicycle and pedestrian connections can also be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. A driveway is provided to State Highway 99W. No street exists to the west, although the applicant will provide a connection for a future public street and a pedestrian and bicycle connection as shown on Sheet A 1.1. 3. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(1). RESPONSE: This section requires that a certain percentage of the street frontage along major and minor arterials be occupied by buildings. SW 72nd Avenue is designated as a major arterial in the Tigard Triangle Street Plan. However, the existing Tigard Cinemas is not adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. Nevertheless, the proposed building expansion along the driveway that provides for a connection to the proposed minor arterial at either end of the Tigard Cinemas site meets the standard. Further, the building's expansion does not make it less conforming because it is not further from SW 72nd Avenue. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 8 of 21 4. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(2). RESPONSE: This section requires that the minimum building setback from public street rights-of- way be zero feet with a maximum building setback of 10 feet. The existing Tigard Cinemas is more than 10 feet from SW 72nd Avenue. The proposed expansion will be within 10 feet of the driveway providing for a connection to the minor arterial. 5. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(3). RESPONSE: This section requires that landscaping, an arcade or a hard-surface expansion of a pedestrian path be provided between the structure in a public street or accessway. This application satisfies this requirement by providing a sidewalk connection between the building to SW 72nd Avenue (see sheet C1.1). A sidewalk is provided from the Tigard Cinemas to State Highway 99W on the north (see sheet C1.1). 6. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(4). RESPONSE: This section requires a walkway connection between a building's entrance and a public street or accessway be at least six (6) feet in width. The application satisfies this requirement by providing such sidewalks (see sheet C1.1). 7. TCDC Section 18.67.070(B)(5). RESPONSE: This section requires that parking for buildings adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located on the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. Because the Tigard Cinemas is an existing structure and because it may only be expanded to the north, and because the parking is already located in front of the building, the Director can find that this section is inapplicable, because the building is a nonconforming structure. 8. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(1). RESPONSE: This section requires that all street-facing elevations within a building setback along public streets include a minimum of 50% of ground floor wall area with windows, display PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 9 of 21 areas or doorway openings. The expansion area on the north adjacent to the driveway substituting as the minor arterial satisfies this standard. However, this section is inapplicable because no building elevation is within a building setback. 9. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(2). RESPONSE: This section requires that building facades facing a public street shall extend no more than fifty (50) feet without providing one of the following features that constitutes a break in the building facade. This application satisfies this requirement by providing building off-sets of at least one (1) foot and other design features such as doorways. RESPONSE: This section also requires that no building facade extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. Each building facade in the proposed Tigard Cinemas contains a pedestrian connection. 10. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(3). RESPONSE: This section requires weather protection for pedestrians such as awnings, canopies and arcades at building entrances. This application satisfies this requirement by providing for an arcade and canopy. 11. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(4). RESPONSE: This section prohibits certain construction materials. This application does not propose to use these construction materials as exterior finish materials. 12. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(5). RESPONSE: This section requires that except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials. This application satisfies this requirement. 13. TCDC Section 18.67.070(C)(6). PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 10 of 21 RESPONSE: This section requires that all roof-mounted equipment be screened from view from adjacent public streets. This application satisfies this requirement. 14. TCDC Section 18.67.070(D)(2)-(4). RESPONSE: This section requires that signs meet certain requirements in addition to the requirements of TCDC Chapter 18.114. This application satisfies these requirements. 15. TCDC Section 18.67.070(E). RESPONSE: This section requires that entry portals be located at certain locations including State Highway 99W and SW 72nd Avenue. This site does not abut that intersection, so an entry portal is not required. 16. TCDC Section 18.67.070(F). RESPONSE: This section requires that certain landscaping and screening requirements be satisfied (see sheet L1.1). This section requires that landscaping within parking lots satisfy the requirements of TCDC Chapter 18.100. The L-1 landscaping standard applies to setbacks on major arterial streets such as SW 72nd Avenue and State Highway 99W. The applicant proposes no change to the driveway location at State Highway 99W. The application proposes to satisfy the L-1 planting standards. 17. Conclusion. For these reasons, this application satisfies the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines. B. Site Development Review 1. TCDC 18.120.020, "Applicability of Provisions". RESPONSE: Site Development Review is applicable to all new developments. This use is required to obtain Site Development Review approval. PDX1A-128923.1 25180.0006 Page 11 of 21 2. TCDC 18.120.030, "Administration and Approval Process". RESPONSE: The applicant held a preapplication conference with City staff on November 18, 1997. The Senior Planner has not required an additional meeting. 3. TCDC 18.120.050, "Phased Development". RESPONSE: This expansion will be constructed in one phase. 4. TCDC 18.120.090, "Application Submission Requirements". RESPONSE: This section requires that the following information be submitted: • The site development plan on a sheet not exceeding 18" by 24". • The site development plan shall show an engineering scale. • Structural elevations at a standard architectural scale of 'A" or 1/8". • A list of the names and addresses of all persons who are property owners of record within 250 feet of the site. (Exhibit 4.) • The required application fee of$2,905.00. • A narrative addressing the existing site conditions analysis, site planning, grading plan, landscaping plan, architectural elevations, sign plan and a copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. The applicant has submitted the required plans and paid the applicable fee. 5. TCDC 18.120.110, "Site Conditions"; TCDC 18.120.120, "The Site Development Plan"; TCDC 18.120.130, "The Grading Plan"; TCDC 18.120.140, "Architectural Drawings": TCDC 18.120.150, "Landscape Plan"; and TCDC 18.120.160, "Sign Drawings". PDXIA-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 12 of 21 RESPONSE: The applicant has provided this information to the City. 6. TCDC 18.120.180, "Approval Standards". a. TCDC Chapter 18.84, "Sensitive Lands". RESPONSE: The site contains a wetland that may be regulated by the state or federal government. However, the site contains no natural features shown on the City's "Floodplain and Wetland Map." This application does not propose any land form alterations to the wetland. b. TCDC Chapter 18.94, "Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations". RESPONSE: This chapter is inapplicable to this application because no manufactured or mobile homes are proposed. c. TCDC Chapter 18.92, "Density Computation". RESPONSE: This chapter is inapplicable to this application because no residential use is proposed. d. TCDC Chapter 18.144, "Accessory Use and Structures". RESPONSE: This chapter is inapplicable to this application because no accessory uses are proposed. e. TCDC Chapter 18.96, "Additional Yard Area Requirements". RESPONSE: TCDC 18.96.020(B)(2)(a) requires a thirty (30) foot setback on SW 72 Avenue. The structure's setback will exceed thirty (30) feet. However, the Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines conflict with this provision, so this section does not control. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 13 of 21 f. TCDC Chapter 18.98, "Building Height Limitations: Exceptions". RESPONSE: The provisions of this chapter are inapplicable to this application. The structures' height will not exceed forty-five (45) feet, the maximum height in this zoning district. g. TCDC Chapter 18.100, "Landscaping and Screening". RESPONSE: i. TCDC sections 18.100.030 and 18.100.035 require that street trees be placed in certain locations. This application complies with these requirements. ii. TCDC section 18.100.070(B) requires that buffering and screening be placed within an interior setback next to adjacent uses which are of a different use type. No different use type is adjacent to this site. iii. TCDC sections 18.100.110(A), (B) and (D). This application will comply with requirements for screening of the new parking and loading areas. The application proposes screening that complies with TCDC section 18.100.110(A)(1)(a) along SW 72nd Avenue. The application complies with the requirements of TCDC section 18.110(A)(1)(d) that requires trees and landscaped islands within the parking lot at the ratio of one (1) tree per seven (7) parking spaces by providing them in the new parking area (see sheet L1.1). The application complies with the requirement of TCDC section 18.100.110(B)(1) that requires screening of service areas. The application complies with the requirement of TCDC section 18.100.110(D)(1) requiring screening of refuse containers. h. TCDC Chapter 18.102, "Visual Clearance Areas". RESPONSE: The application complies with the requirements of TCDC Chapter 18.102. i. TCDC Chapter 18.106, "Off-Street Parking and Loading". PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 14 of 21 RESPONSE: This application provides the required number of off-street parking spaces consistent with the proposed number of theatre seats pursuant to TCDC Chapter 18.132. The existing eleven auditoria in the theater contain 2,739 seats. At the previously required 1:4 parking ratio (applicable at the time of the theatre's construction), 687 parking spaces were required. The TCDC currently requires one (1) parking space per three (3) seats. TCDC Section 18.106.030(C)(5), "Amusement Enterprises", requires one (1) off-street parking space per three (3) seats for a theater. The applicant proposes to add 788 seats in the new auditoria and to reduce the existing 2,739 seats to 2,266 seats providing a total of 3054 seats. (Exhibit 10 and 11.) The seats in the six (6) new auditoria are required to provide parking at the current TCDC standard of 1:3 in order to provide a total of 263 parking spaces. The reduced seats in the existing 11 auditoria require 567 parking spaces. Because this application reduces the non- conformity of the parking requirements for the existing 11 auditoria, the applicant may provide 567 off-street parking spaces for the reduced 2,266 seats in the 11 auditoria. A total of 830 spaces is required. The applicant is proposing 836 parking spaces in the existing parking lot and the new parking lot between the Tri-Met parking lot and SW 72nd Avenue. The Tri-Met parking lot contains 208 parking spaces. If the City were to purchase the rights-of-way for the minor arterial street and backage road across the theatre site, approximately 104 parking spaces would be contained in 60-foot- wide rights-of-way. This would reduce the 836 Eastgate Theatre parking spaces to 732. However, with the remaining 208 parking spaces in the Tri-Met parking lot, the applicant would still be able to provide 940 parking spaces in parking lots. Exhibit 12 is the reciprocal access easement with Tri-Met. j. TCDC Chapter 18.108, "Access, Egress and Circulation". RESPONSE: This application complies with the requirements of TCDC sections 18.108.050(A) and requiring walkways between the ground floor entrances and adjacent streets. The application also satisfies TCDC section 18.108.080 governing vehicle access, egress and circulation requirements for commercial uses. TCDC section 18.108.080(A) requires that a certain number of access driveways be provided to the site. This site has more than 100 parking spaces, so a minimum of two 30-foot wide driveways with a minimum of 24-foot pavement width be provided. The application satisfies this requirement (see sheet C1.1). PDXIA-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 15 of 21 Pedestrian walkways are provided from all parking areas to the front doors of the theater and connect to the sidewalk on SW 72nd Avenue (see sheet C1.1). k. TCDC Chapter 18.114. "Signs". RESPONSE: This application proposes signs that comply with the requirements of this chapter. Specifically, TCDC section 18.114.130(C)(1)(a)(ii) provides the maximum square footage shall be 70 square feet per face for a total of 140 square feet per space for all sign faces for free-standing signs. Only one (1) multi-face free-standing sign is permitted. The free-standing sign is limited to 20 feet in height when located next to the public right-of-way. TCDC section 18.114.130(C)(1)(b) regulates wall signs. The application complies with these requirements. 1. TCDC Chapter 18.150. "Tree Removal". RESPONSE: The applicant has submitted a tree plan as required by TCDC section 18.150.025. Only one tree in excess of twelve (12) inches in diameter is to be removed. (Exhibits 10 and 13). The applicant will comply with TCDC 18.150.070(E) by paying a fee to the City. m. TCDC Chapter 18.164. "Street and Utility Improvement Standards". RESPONSE: The applicant will comply with the improvement standards contained in this section, except as noted below. TCDC section 18.164.030(F) requires a future street plan and extension of streets in certain instances not present in this application. The applicant proposes to provide a connection through the parking lot between SW 72nd Avenue on the east and SW Dartmouth Boulevard on the west. No other site conditions or approval criteria require a future street plan or extension of existing streets. n. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(2), "Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment". PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 16 of 21 RESPONSE: The natural drainage ditch will be protected in its existing condition. A pedestrian bridge will cross the natural drainage course. Nine (9) existing trees will be removed as part of the development but ninety-six (96) additional trees will be planted. This is a mitigation ratio of over ten (10) new trees for every one (1) tree lost. No steep or unstable slopes exist on this site. o. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(3), "Exterior Elevations". RESPONSE: This section is inapplicable to this application because it applies only to single-family attached and multi-family structures. p. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(4), "Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses". RESPONSE: The section is inapplicable because all of the adjoining uses are of the same use type as this use. q. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(5), "Privacy and Noise". RESPONSE: This section is inapplicable because all of the adjoining uses are the same use type as this use. r. TCDC Sections 18.120.180(A)(6) and (7), "Private Outdoor and Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use". RESPONSE: These sections do not apply to this application because it does not propose a residential use. s. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(8). PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 17 of 21 RESPONSE: The site does not contain a 100-year floor plain, so it is inapplicable to this application. t. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(9), "Demarcation of Public, Semi- Public and Private Spaces: Crime Prevention". RESPONSE: This section is inapplicable to this application because no formal public areas are proposed. Nevertheless, the proposed landscaping along SW 72nd Avenue will provide for an attractive right-of-way. u. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(10), "Crime Prevention and Safety". RESPONSE: The application complies with this section by providing for a design which meets the requirements of this section. v. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(11), "Access and Circulation". RESPONSE: The application complies with these requirements. w. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(12). "Public Transit". RESPONSE: The application is adjacent to Tri-Met bus lines. x. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(13), "Parking". RESPONSE: The application satisfies the requirements of this section. TCDC Section 18.106.020(H).2(a) allows shared parking in commercial zones for commercial uses requiring more than 40 parking spaces up to 300 feet from the use. However, the peak hours of the commercial uses must not overlap. The Theatre's peak uses are in the evening and on weekends, whereas the Tri-Met parking lot's peak uses are on weekday mornings and afternoons. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 18 of 21 y. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(14), "Landscaping". RESPONSE: The application satisfies the requirements of this section requiring a minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the site to be landscaped. The site contains 74,800 square feet, of which 19,692 square feet is landscaped. Twenty-six (26) percent of the gross site area is to be landscaped. z. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(15), "Drainage". RESPONSE: The applicant will provide drainage plans consistent with the City's 1991 Master Drainage Plan. aa. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(16), "Provision for the Handicapped". RESPONSE: All facilities for the handicapped will meet the requirements of the Oregon Revised Statutes. bb. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(17), "Signs". RESPONSE: The application complies with the requirements of TCDC Chapter 18.14. cc. TCDC Section 18.120.180(A)(18). RESPONSE: This section requires that the provisions and regulation of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections of the TCDC. This site is located within the CG zoning district. The proposed use is a permitted use in the CG district pursuant to TCDC Section 18.62.030(A)(2)(b), "Amusement Enterprises". The application meets the dimensional requirements of the CG zoning district. TCDC sections 18.62.050(A)(1)-(6). No minimum lot area is required. No front yard setback is PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 19 of 21 required. The site does not abut a residential zoning district. The proposed building will not exceed 45 feet in height. The proposed maximum site coverage including all the buildings and impervious surfaces does not exceed 85 percent and over 15 percent of the site is landscaped. dd. TCDC Section 18.62.060, "Additional Requirements". This site does not contain an Historic Overlay district or Sensitive Lands designation. The application is also required to address the following supplemental provisions: TCDC Chapters 18.90, "Environmental Performance Standards", and TCDC Chapter 18.104, "Fuel Tank Installations." Neither of these chapters is applicable to this application. C. "Impact Study", TCDC Section 18.32.050(5). Tigard Community Development Code ("TCDC") section 18.32.050(5) requires an impact study. The impact of this application on the various facilities is shown below. 1. Transportation System Including Bikeways. The traffic impact study demonstrates that this application will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent transportation system including SW 72nd Avenue, SW Dartmouth Avenue and State Highway 99E. The study proposes certain mitigation items to address the impacts of this application on city and state transportation facilities. This application proposes to dedicate and improve the right-of-way on SW 72nd Avenue. The City can find that with the mitigation measures proposed by the transportation study, this application's transportation impacts will be adequately addressed. Notwithstanding TCDC section 18.32.050(5), Dolan v. City of Tigard places the burden on the City of Tigard to demonstrate that an approval condition is roughly proportional to the impact of the application. 2. Water and Sewer System. The application will not overburden the City's water and sewer system. 3. Noise Impact. The application will have no noise impact. 4. Park System. The application will have no impact on the City's park system. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 20 of 21 III. CONCLUSION The Director can find that this application satisfies the applicable approval criteria. PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 Page 21 of 21 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 Site Plan Exhibit 3 Traffic Impact Study Exhibit 4 Pre-Application Meeting Notes Exhibit 5 Neighborhood Meeting Exhibit 6 Application Form Exhibit 7 Title Transfer Instrument and Deed Exhibit 8 December 11, 1998 letter of incompleteness Exhibit 9 Water Quality Calculation Exhibit 10 January 6, 1999 letter from W&H Pacific discussing off-street parking spaces and tree survey Exhibit 11 Tigard Cinemas parking count Exhibit 12 Reciprocal access easement with Tri-Met Exhibit 13 January 13, 1999 letter from TVA Architects PDX1A-128923.1 25180-0006 „,,ti „,, 4 ,w OCNU "I- nti w -n tcn AI\, rrn SW 81ST A : ti ; /� \ �f�. SW 19TH v'+ AV i SW� '. ``"�'� SW 78TH^ AV -"'� �'�� 11300 ie 1 . SW l J CA 1 t fm E� z . w,._7.A4v1",11. --ii...-44,--7-1' :. i..1 g i 4ri . `?.000 N 11200 { �3� c-, .. SW71S $Ec • I t `.. .. —) AV hd �. PKWY A T -sW '�69TN �.r_� t D� �, SW M lz000 i Kr; 67. A `— 189 Y y�� T�SW i AV NAM , R>. —i • t 6TN h ._ �, __ — — Ta .recd + :•<.s ~ w _I, : E b4TH / : b4Tr{ av W eN AV --12100 :r fi , ; \ P1 4 �. ��Q ^.st 5W +N ._ S } A ." x 61ST AV 4.... •: CD ' W ”' 6UTH AV �F ,`c.� SIERRA (411c L. - -• `^ SE "__f K t�, --t�� rr4 `I 500 n �'� GERS R0 i s'; ,x'sw F; a ; r' •"': 9'°r. �Ir----`��- 111fI fT11111 i 111T1 III I` u } ?` }M.�". t' A•, .t or te �`f . I ;I I I I I I III .—..—.._.._.._.._.._.._..—.._.._.._..—..—.._. 4.,. ,s ,•,• 1 111 I I I I I I I I i I1 I i31.'�44�... 1.f.111'I•I 1 H 1111111 I.. I 1 ► "1 I _ X. , r4, `MM• ® uF r 1 • X. l�Illl�llllilllll'� � _ I(�I ...-...1.-.,:, " ' �' ;r,; TVA '`I 1 i ,L. r'I. i I I I I I Il (� I ,\ •, r Jed .+�1 '�T N i 'I I 11 :1. �.•1:11i`rrl 1 '11,1'']' y a!i>s ± ` ! 1 ---__-••• (*.1 e`I.�p-.��ILJ •' w�.Yl,Itl y I 1 LN 1..1 l J.'� I I 1//�l' — — 1 �1I I311f ♦�N �'- ' ,• J ..— --. —.--..fit...._•.��_�r..�....{! ,=— s „.,...?1,.‘\ 44*,n. E:,, ..t �: r a`: •�' 1- i 1 1 111!_ .. . 10 .�aiQ� ,, T C— — -------- l 1 f':,;- -,'�1 r. •: •,-•t,,.._. \ . .L ; xLe=�1,t•':XA'SG" i.- _• -�.>• «' utum ftl�os •;, T' Fin.,`P:9s.1. .\. \ ® VICINITY MAP (—• _ .. ! _ _ _ !W x\., '�\ NO SCALE ,_ ` •.•.,• i, .- i' �, � �,� i1 I I I I TTU I I I I I I I I I I I it• A I. = ' U111111111110-111111.1.11f1:1\ 11 I .1`,-�T� J..;11-10• T.. NIT..r'11 I I �\ i 1— — \ 11 I 4: •..i� / -';7,1'..,;17.. a2'_�u' {��•'� .\\\\\ 't 1 \, ; I �. ;�. ` , — ("7 DD Ill I^ I , • Q p . 17T a Q�EMAS . .. • '� 1\ i ... 1-Fl a I I I 1 I I I F"'gr- II ,t• —1L \. .- 1.4!41,••,141:141: '\':01;, •`N! .,. ,:5: _ - — I 1 \ '--� •, —1 ;51 ��p pi`,Iy!'al i 1 I ' \' '!lf1iII11IIIILIIIfL - \ \ Z _ x 4' I��''• :.fi'"f'..4�.�i= +lre.- �'1',P: .I� �r11a11�J•,1�.1t 7.I,I. .1, \ ra � 111.11 ......» a W • 5 .1;j. III I �•fpetr INfi\%e1 1 } .1.11;81..I�Ii1:i:111• , • v. `,,, • �1c.1`- 'It J , ►� l ill/1 111\., ,'wwu •... ,. C..� •.� tea: �. i �. L1 t t1 C� I s 'ICY .� .T<3-� 1,• .l t-k N I �,:r:1:1:1}f '. - ' a� � ' .l o', • • II I'1 CT{IIt _ ��1,�,1 > IJ. 1: I1�.IIiYL �:111'I�i+'I,ii�i1:l:l:l �f7: \�\ �.�\ , y fl 1 'l ; 11 11111ij111 i�: ''V•. '.i�e Q — d' !Mt I'I irTr q1 I I l'I 11'1 1 `•II . fin: • -i ' I I I :�� u �'� .� ! 11'��. .i ��\ \ 11�111�3 • - I�1t: I i k ;; �IfifIIIIIII IIIIIIIII:liP� �: . .1 , 4 ; ,iv.',,5 1— I S ' 1 \. i = ,.j I I III I I lilt 1 =I'�t f fi�-f- 41-1-If4� ll-f f 1 I-f ffl f.l l ) = N1.1- 5 ,/f//� l — `� .'' :.) a F '.-4."..‘_�� i_J_ L J i! a��.�n,As srsr∎ ��>.i:•N.=7.�4� •i7..,--��rj1 -C R...'—. i —A: _ �`. ,-- ...._ .. ..........._..__.... . \.,.r : I,_�i _ I _ _._ _..__.-.. . _ -- • ......�..: -^ • woe/wo_ M • .Wine rams • — ------ PAI1IC AREA»u•5ARY e.61MC LOT TOT. In 9'.05 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN REVISED SEAT COUNT S"AOESe'MOYED FOR`ocDSOM.. -+»sr•af SCALE ,' 40-0- fgAeiK •...Ox'eL•nm Sr•Cf111.0M10•T 1[n.tr St»n.Ave.s.f -.0 7.011 r»A1w y•rl •1 FW ii••T5 AO IC RveeO CONCEPTUAL 1»•1N ..O Y•Tf .F••11E0 fat at LOT IOT. •N 9•Q5 ADDRESS- LOT�•rA1 II .n 1.1 .•..1»•m.a n• 15070 )arm 10.005 SITE _ ••s VACS PLAN .451 •r of W.T>(•r•.O na 1Or.....°"0'.Ow IS.91•121 > a THEATERS rdC 11626 SW PACFIC HWY TIGARD,OREGON e^n1 ••1s••1 Ho >11 W.114•1•11 OM w SW TAYLOR ST ^ .ELOT T.,.••• »> Wm T.t....e fE 900 earl TN Ares ss n> m n• M. 1401000 ?TLANp,OREGON LEGAL ION D I mums.• T5o a. .stir T,••rw•n ~ •re ae.5.07, 111055.w1•a.•Awaq yOtu o... >i>nnl SE I/4 SECTION 36 T 1 S R I w,W M TAX LOT 500 DWI mums., 00 1011.4,3 a>» •11 1074 EATS 1451 ..•.•.I •> _w eMTra;101.Or UM SIAM O •••4505 SP>••O<f r nf•1 40 Kw ii SEA if 1 'at .. - Ott. SO Mr, - -T- .A1.. & ; b + 3 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND,OR 97205 • (503)228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 July 23, 1998 Project #: 2955 Mr. Tim Reed ACT III Theatres 919 SW Taylor St., Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 RE: Traffic Impact Study Addendum for Proposed Expansion of the ACT III Theatre in Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Reed: The purpose of this letter is to update the analysis presented in the July 6, 1998 Traffic Impact Study for the Act III Expansion to include traffic volume estimates from the recently approved Tri-County Center development. This letter serves as an addendum to the July 6, 1998 study. As described in the July 6th report,the Tri-County Center was not approved at the time the analysis for the Act III Expansion traffic study was conducted. The traffic analysis for this addendum focused on 1999 total traffic (with Act III expansion) conditions during the Friday p.m. commuter period of traffic (4:30- 5:30 p.m.), which provides a worst-case traffic scenario as shown in the July 6 report. Tri-County Center Development The Tri-County Center was approved in June 1998 to build out as 330,000 square feet of retail use. The Tri-County site is located on the southwest corner of the SW Dartmouth Street/SW 72nd Avenue intersection in the Tigard Triangle. Access to the site will occur via full-access driveways located on SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue. Traffic volume estimates for the Tri-County site were obtained from the Tri-County Center Traffic Impact Study (Lancaster Engineering, February 1998). The Tri-County Center is expected to generate 11,778 daily trips and 1,118 p.m. peak hour trips. The estimated site-generated traffic volumes on SW 72nd Avenue for the Tri- County site are shown in Attachment "A " of this addendum. 1999 Total Traffic Volume Update The Tri-County Center site-generated traffic volumes shown in Attachment "A" of this addendum were added to the 1999 total traffic volumes shown in Figure 8 of the July 6 report to arrive at updated 1999 total traffic volumes shown in Figure 1 of this addendum. Table 1 below provides a level-of-service analysis for the updated 1999 total traffic conditions. FILE NAME:H:\PROJFILE\2955\REPOR712955ADDN.WPD EXHIBIT 3 eTh NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 04. °-0n 91„c, 11 k. 130-1 k.-55 1570-4- 4— 180• 100Thi or 305 000 a 1 t coo 1 ka w X0 0 ® H- Q C,V) z N r-.. N V M 1760-0. 4—197' Q z ,/ 3 �o 125 a vv', .91 P o r(I UYV) T� 11 N 0 c0, 0 1 1 <5-'14 35-1 <5� 70-.4 t JrD t, 00 215-1 114%-55 525-4- 4—365 200 180 SW DARTMOUTH 0 ') ST 0C' moo R'-COUNTY CENTE All. \ UPDATED 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY P.M. PEAK COMMUTER PERIOD ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ADDENDUM FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON 1 .,� JULY 1998 Mr. Tim Reed Project:2955 July 23, 1998 Page:3 Table 1 1999 Total Traffic Levels of Service Signalized/All-Way Stop Unsignalized Average Average Delay Critical Delay Intersection V/C (sec/veh) LOS Approach (sec/veh) LOS Friday P.M.Commuter Peak Hour(4:30-5:30 P.M.) Highway 99W/ACT III Main Access 0.68 0.4 A Highway 99WISW 72nd Avenue 0.89 22.0 C SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Access EB-LT 29.1 D SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III North Access EB 11.1 C SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street' 0.81 26.4 D EB-LT=Eastbound Lett-Turn:EB=Eastbound 1. Intersection is planned for signalization as part of the Tri-Count! Center development. As shown in Table 1, all intersections are expected to continue to operate acceptably with the addition of traffic from the Tri-County Center development. Attachment "B" contains the level-of- service worksheets. I trust that this letter adequately addresses the issues associated with the transportation-related impacts of the recently approved Tri-County Center and the proposed Tigard ACT III expansion in Tigard, Oregon. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely. KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Dina M. Sykora Julia A. Kuhn Butorac. P.E. Engineering Associate Senior Engineer Attachment: "A" - Tri-County Center Site-Generated Traffic Volumes - Level-of-service Worksheets • Kitte/son&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Attachment "A" Tri-County Center Site-Generated Traffic Volumes ems ,.gO 4 s -.,-.1:.p.-7:: :-•ac 7.:;;!,,..7..;:.:;., 1 P: T t 1 a9•t41 ti p.5.5 ,ti ol o BSI'51) Fred c \fir 0° tno Meyer Qoo -"5pi Aso o �y� BOO �� p Haines Street .11411111111 . t._0 000 E—0 0.1' tTrj 0-4 000 0-q, B Dartmouth Street <, i PROJECT I D _ ( _ _ 7 \F17 � SITE _ J NNb _ c�-- � <_t- ----8 r> L -1 <1�y sC -2 , . -s-� tD�' 42-� 4 --> fncoN B 'L -2 -:N! EJ.I,4 sr25 0 a ti CD 1 E`er t in —3 T Ei T r> N -8-) N' n 14 Hampton Street D 111 co N ry i o f s>� N C „� <is, _ 4J� <_„ 0_, \N/ ,4 -j, 2�, No Scale -_ `= I 3 DIVERTED AND PASS—BY SITE TRIPS PM Peak Hour LANCASTER ENGINEERING <.c'wy ti :•4qr.. "I r. .• ?%',tk"✓': ;.iiriAlr tV4.in0s rY.'ss'*.4014 °+[ 'it.41 ,s F 41: v ;t1ttc4',' 1.Y. t7 ti' - 9g\A> QC E (e 0 o r�01 o Si Fred c N 9 y o° p7r / .00 ��o " ° 00 , Haines Street \59- t 0 moo E—53 (J .1.y c0• 105 - El T 0 105 —> 000 0 /� — B Dartmouth Street A op- , t i 5 J , PROJECT 1 .0 .0 48 � SITE _ _1 D 0 1 ��o t74 J40 ,...,''3 105 is T : �, 105 -� cN^ 1 0 -z, 1 U p o 00o F-48 c -x .Ly .0 97 0.1 Q a. i F 0 � EIT� r',, be t ,n Ed 105-) °moo ^ `° i p ---' ti Hampton Street Dter. (:-L u-)–N 40, C (--I NI, <-1%1/ ' !A 1T_ 19� <1T 5i (--IT NF 132 `vo 15 -N Scale ",-• : NEW SITE TRIPS •s Peak Hour ,� PM P LANCASTER ENGINEERING tricnt_4.dwg Attachment " B" 1999 Total Traffic Levels-of- Service Worksheets 99C0M.CMD Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 Page 1-1 J Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 2-1 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM Trip Generation Report Trip Distribution Report Forecast for Percent Of Trips Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total X Of To Gates # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total 2 3 4 5 6 Zone 1 30.0 30.0 5.0 0.0 35.0 1 ACT III 55.00 Expansion 300 0.58 0.42 32 23 55 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal 32 23 55 100.0 TOTAL 32 23 55 100.0 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S 2 99COM.OUT 7-23-98 11:17a Page 1 of 5 —— 99COM.CMD Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 Page 3-1 .AD Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 4-1 KITTELSON $ ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #2 Hwy 99W/ACT III Main Access # 2 Hwy 99W/ACT III Main Access A 0.2 0.692 A 0.4 0.683 + 0.186 D/V Base 82 0 31 10 31 21 0 1792 118 0 2003 0 4089 Added 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 19 # 7 Hwy 99W/SW 72nd Avenue C 18.8 0.896 C 22.0 0.886 + 3.161 D/V PassBy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -35 0 0 -35 0 -70 Total 90 0 31 10 31 21 0 1758 129 0 1969 0 4038 # 10 72nd Avenue/ACT III North Acce B 0.0 0.000 C 0.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #7 Hwy 99W/SW 72nd Avenue # 11 SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Ac C 1.1 0.000 D 1.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Base 124 139 211 134 98 108 129 1607 98 155 1833 57 4692 Added 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 17 # 13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St C 22.6 0.681 D 26.4 0.805 + 3.753 D/V PassBy 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 -35 0 145 -35 0 230 Total 124 139 373 134 98 108 129 1572 98 309 1798 57 4939 #10 72nd Avenue/ACT III North Access Base 1 474 0 0 350 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 828 Added 0 7 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 PassBy 0 155 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Total 1 636 0 0 505 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1146 #11 SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Access Base 93 443 0 0 304 46 31 0 62 0 0 0 979 Added 11 0 0 0 0 10 7 0 8 0 0 0 36 PassBy 0 155 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Total 104 598 0 0 449 56 38 0 70 0 0 0 1314 #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St Base 175 381 41 139 180 46 93 386 196 149 252 62 2101 Added 0 10 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 PassBy 10 5 15 -5 40 100 120 140 5 30 110 -5 565 Total 185 396 56 135 227 146 213 526 201 179 362 58 2685 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kitteison, Portland, OR S 99COM.CUT 7-23-98 11:17a Page 2 of 5 t 99C0M.CMD Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 Page 5-1 .D Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 5-1--1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Hwy 99W/ACT III Main Access Intersection #7 Hwy 99W/SW 72nd Avenue Cycle (sec): 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.683 Cycle (sec): 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.886 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.0 Optima( Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: A Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I Ii II II I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 2 0 0 0 1 II 0 0 11 0 0 II 0 0 1 1 0 II 1 1 II II II 0 0 2 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 30 10 30 20 1740 115 1945 Base Vol: 120 135 205 130 95 105 125 1560 95 150 1780 55 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 82 31 10 31 21 1792 118 2003 Initial Bse: 124 139 211 134 98 108 129 1607 98 155 1833 57 Added Vol: 8 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 Added Vol: 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 -35 0 -35 PasserByVol: 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 -35 0 145 -35 0 Initial Fut: 90 31 10 31 21 1758 129 1969 Initial Fut: 124 139 373 134 98 108 129 1572 98 309 1798 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.97 0.97 0.9 0.97 0.9 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 93 32 11 32 21 1812 133 2030 PHF Volume: 128 143 385 138 101 111 133 1620 101 319 1854 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 93 32 11 32 21 1812 133 2030 Reduced Vol: 128 143 385 138 101 111 133 1620 101 319 1854 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.05 1.05 1.0 1.05 1.0 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.05 Final Vol.: 96 32 11 32 21 1903 140 2131 Final Vol.: 128 143 385 138 101 111 133 1701 101 328 1947 61 I I II II I l II II II 1 Saturation Flow Module: Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.93 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 Adjustment: 0.34 0.98 0.83 0.51 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.98 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.98 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 0.50 0.33 0.00 1.86 0.14 0.00 2.00 0.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.52 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.94 0.06 Final Sat.: 3539 0 1583 273 793 520 0 3402 250 0 3725 0 Final Sat.: 652 1863 1583 969 816 897 1770 3725 1583 3539 3612 113 II II II I ( II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.57 0.00 Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.08 0.24 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.46 0.06 0.09 0.54 0.54 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.84 0.00 Green/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.34 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.58 0.58 0.12 0.61 0.61 Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.00 0.51 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.68 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.35 0.72 0.64 0.56 0.56 0.89 0.79 0.11 0.79 0.89 0.89 Level Of Service Module: I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 58.9 0.0 55.4 61.1 61.1 61.1 0.0 -2.3 -2.3 0.0 -2.4 0.0 Delay/Veh: . 70.0 35.1 34.0 42.0 38.2 38.2 77.6 12.2 6.4 55.7 12.4 12.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjOel/Veh: 58.9 0.0 55.4 61.1 61.1 61.1 0.0 -2.3 -2.3 0.0 -2.4 0.0 AdjDel/Veh: 70.0 35.1 34.0 42.0 38.2 38.2 77.6 12.2 6.4 55.7 12.4 12.4 Queue: 4 0 1 1 2 1 0 28 2 0 32 0 Queue: 6 5 14 5 4 4 7 53 2 13 67 3 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S 99COM.OUT 7-23-98 11:17a Page 3 of 5 -�-�-� r 99COM.CMD Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 Page 7-1 .J Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 3-1 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 NCH Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #10 72nd Avenue/ACT III North Access Intersection #11 SK 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Access Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R , II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign I Control: I II II II Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign I Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Modul e: I I I I I I I Volume Modul e: I I I I I I Base Vol: 1 460 340 1 1 1 Base Vol: 90 430 295 45 30 60 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 1 474 350 1 1 1 Initial Bse: 93 443 304 46 31 62 Added Vol: 0 7 10 1 0 0 Added Vol: 11 0 0 10 7 8 PasserByVol: 0 155 145 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 155 145 0 0 0 • Initial Fut: 1 636 505 2 1 1 Initial Fut: 104 598 449 56 38 70 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 1 636 505 2 1 1 PHF Volume: 114 657 0 0 493 61 42 0 77 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 636 505 2 1 1 Final Vol.: 114 657 0 0 493 61 42 0 77 0 0 0 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0% 0 0 Grade: 0% 0% 07. 07. X Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx X Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx X Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx % Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 1 636 0 0 505 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 115 657 0 0 493 61 42 0 78 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I I II II II I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 506 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1142 xxxx 506 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 555 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1295 xxxx 524 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 984 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 231 xxxx 768 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 933 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 188 xxxx 751 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.88 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Hove Cap.: 984 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 231 xxxx 768 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 933 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 165 xxxx 751 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service II II II I ice Module: Level Of Service Module: II II II Stopped Del: 3.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.7 xxxx 4.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 4.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 29.1 xxxx 5.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: A * * * * * D * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 326 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpOel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 ApproachOel: 0.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S - - ------ 99C0M.OUT 7-23-98 11:17a Page 4 of 5 ---J 99COM.CMD Thu Jul 23, 1998 11:17:38 Page 9-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER - ADDENDUM Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.805 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.4 Optimal Cycle: 78 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound M o v e m e n t: I L - T - R I I L - T - R I I L - T - R I I L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module. II II II Base Vol: 170 370 40 135 175 45 90 375 190 145 245 60 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 175 381 41 139 180 46 93 386 196 149 252 62 Added Vol: 0 10 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 10 5 15 -5 40 100 120 140 5 30 110 -5 Initial Fut: 185 396 56 135 227 146 213 526 201 179 362 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 189 404 57 138 232 149 217 537 205 183 370 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 189 404 57 138 232 149 217 537 205 183 370 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 189 404 57 138 232 149 217 537 205 183 370 60 Saturation Flow Module: t1 II II I Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.98 0.98 Lanes: 1.00 0.88 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.14 Final Sat.: 1805 1632 230111805 1900 1615111805 1900 1615111805 1602 2601 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.28 0.13 0.10 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.31 0.31 Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.56 0.43 0.74 0.80 0.36 0.80 0.74 0.74 Level Of Service Module: II I I I Delay/Veh: 25.5 26.3 26.3 44.4 23.9 22.3 32.0 23.9 15.7 40.1 23.1 23.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjOel/Veh: 25.5 26.3 26.3 44.4 23.9 22.3 32.0 23.9 15.7 40.1 23.1 23.1 Queue: 5 11 2 5 6 4 6 15 4 6 10 2 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S - 99CCM.OUT 7-23-98 11:17a Page 5 of 5 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND.OR 97205 • (503)228-5230 • FAX(503)273.8169 July 6, 1998 Project#: 2955 Mr. Tim Reed ACT III Theatres 919 SW Taylor St., Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 RE: Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Expansion of the ACT III Theatre in Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Reed: At your request, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. has prepared a transportation impact analysis for the proposed expansion of the ACT III Theatre in Tigard, Oregon. Figure 1 displays the site vicinity map. The proposed expansion would increase the existing 11-screen, 2,739-seat theater to a 17- screen, 3,039-seat theater. A new parking area is also proposed north of the wetland that traverses the site. Access to this new parking area is proposed via SW 72nd Avenue approximately 515 feet north of the existing theater driveway. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. This letter summarizes the transportation related impacts of the proposed expansion of the ACT III Theatre in Tigard, Oregon. These impacts were evaluated at the following study area intersections: • Highway 99W/ACT III Main Access, • Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue, • SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street Avenue, • SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Access, and • SW 72nd Avenue/Proposed North Access. The Friday p.m. peak hour of commuter traffic and the p.m. peak hour of theater traffic were evaluated.These time periods represent the highest total traffic demands on the transportation system (Friday commuter peak)and the highest traffic demands turning in and out of the theater driveways. Based on the results of our analysis, it is concluded that the Tigard ACT III Theatre expansion can be constructed with minimal safety and operational impacts to the surrounding street system. All study area intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service during both peak periods, with the exception of the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection which operates at LOS "F" under existing conditions.A traffic signal is warranted today at the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth FILE NAME:H:\PROJFILE\2955\REPORT\2955REPI.WPD Mr. Tim Reed Project•2955 July 6, 1998 Page:2 9 Street intersection without the expansion of the theater. and the intersection is planned for signalization as part of the Tri-County Center development which was approved in June 1998. The remainder of this letter documents the analysis and details our results and findings. EXISTING CONDITIONS The ACT III Theatre in Tigard is located in the southwest quadrant of the Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue intersection. Access to the theater is currently provided via the signalized intersection of SW 74th Avenue/Highway 99W and at an unsignalized driveway on SW 72nd Avenue (see Figure 1). The site is bordered on the north by the Tri-Met Park and Ride parking lot, on the east by SW 72nd Avenue, and on the south by CUB Foods. Transportation Facilities The primary roadways providing access to the site are Highway 99W. SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street. In the site vicinity, Highway 99W is a seven-lane roadway providing the major east-west route for traffic. Highway 99W is classified by the City of Tigard as a Major Arterial and as a Category-1 Highway by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). SW 72nd Avenue is a two-lane roadway designated as a Major Collector in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan and provides the major north-south route for traffic. SW Dartmouth Street is also designated as a Major Collector in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Both SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street are designated by the Tigard Triangle Street Plan as a Major Arterial. Table 1 summarizes the transportation facilities in the site vicinity. Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices at the study area intersections. Table I Existing Transportation Facilities Cross- On- Section Speed Side- Bicycle Street Name Classification (ft) (mph) Walks? Lanes Parking Highway 99W Major Arterial' 73 40 Yes Yes No Category 4 Highway SW 72nd Avenue Major Arterial' 30 30 Partial' No No Major Collector SW Dartmouth Street Major Arterial' 36 30 Partial` No No Major Collector I.ODOT Classification=Category 4 Highway:City of Tigard Classification=Major Arterial 2.Tigard Triangle Street Plan Classification=Major Arterial:City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Classification=Major Collector 3.Sidewalks exist on the east and west side of SW 72nd Ave. near McDonalds and the s%estside only near the SW Dartmouth St.intersection. 4.Tigard Triangle Street Plan Classification=Major Arterial:City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Classification=Major Collector 5.Sidewalks are present on the north side of SW Dartmouth St.near Cub Foods. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) Ok ac, \G x Q. a I- m o tr._ 0 n Z N Q=4. 0 SIT .- -41 I# 1110 o al6'4,0 jh ST s*. al 9L e•'A �O t SITE VICINITY MAP IACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ■�/ TIGARD, OREGON I �� JULY 1998 `s_� NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) O�o a G\E�G x Q. a co co z N N - 3 - N 4001!!! %s,TE DAFT °MTh' sr 45.1*4 s / to ti` 9 C vo ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION FIGURE - TIGARD, OREGON 6 K JULY 1998 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) s(\s% 4 S 21,0 } N ® = Q U f/1 Q Z i/ °4?t41 UTh ST EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON 3 K JULY 1998 - 1 Mr. Tim Reed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page:6 Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity As shown in Table 1. sidewalks and bicycle lanes are present along Highway 99W to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle activity in the area. At this time. sidewalks are provided on SW 72nd Avenue along the McDonald's site frontage and on the east side of the road at the SW Dartmouth Street intersection. Sidewalks are also present on the north side of SW Dartmouth Street near the Cub Foods site. Bicycle lanes are not provided on either SW 72nd Avenue or SW Dartmouth Street. Field observations in the vicinity of the ACT III Theatre revealed pedestrian and bicycle activity low enough to be considered negligible for analysis purposes by the Highway Capacity Manual standards. Transit Facilities Tri-Met currently operates three bus routes within the site vicinity. Route 12. Barbur Boulevard, provides service along Highway 99W and Barbur Boulevard between Sherwood and downtown Portland. The route operates at 10-minute headways during the weekday morning and evening peaks and 15-minute headways during the off-peak. On weekends and holidays. Route 12 operates at 30- minute headways. Bus stops are located near the Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue intersection. Route 64X Marquam Hill-Tigard TC, provides services along SW Capitol Highway and Highway 99W between the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) and the Tigard Transit Center. The route operates at 30-minute headways on weekday mornings and evenings. The hours of operation are limited to 6:00 - 8:20 a.m. and 3:30 - 6:15 p.m. Route 95X, Tigard 1-5 Express, provides transit service along Highway 99W between Sherwood and downtown Portland from 6:00 to 8:15 a.m. and 3:20 to 6:30 p.m. The route operates at 20-minute headways on weekday mornings and evenings. No weekend or holiday service is provided for either the 64X or 95X bus routes. The bus stops for both routes are located on Highway 99W near the Tigard ACT III Main Access driveway. A Park and Ride parking lot is located on the east side of the ACT III Main Access near Highway 99W. Existing Traffic Volumes and Operations The analysis for this study focused on two peak periods: the Friday p.m. commuter peak and Friday p.m. theater peak. The Friday peak periods were selected for analysis because the theater typically has substantially higher attendance on Friday as opposed to any other weekday. Traffic counts were conducted from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Friday. December 5. 1997 at the following study area intersections: • Highway 99W/ACT III Main Access. • Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue. • SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Access. and • SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. Based on the traffic volumes obtained at the study area intersections. the p.m. peak hours of commuter and theater traffic occurred from 4:30 - 5:30 p.m. and 6:30- 7:30 p.m., respectively. The traffic volumes during the two peak hour conditions are shown in Figure 4. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon COMMUTER PEAK HOUR QV'' -. 4:30 P.M.-5:30 P.M. NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 000 / > N.7- V7 Q d k. C 802 z N n .11 \ . 111 ~1945 �1 1.4\ �I / ■ N 1560 5780 00 0 ✓ C i 1 1 1 O N N N✓f0 --N n M d"- NQ1 � jt Al sot IL60 375-0. 4---245 30-11 190 ♦♦ 0..0 45 SW DARTMOUTH 60� ....„..........) � ( ST R1 t 000 °m0 —M X\ THEATER PEAK HOUR QPG`c. 6:30 P.M.-7:30 P.M. .11 0 -0 0 .r,0- a i nco- ,r cm � � a z 951 �50 1205—► 4-1345 1325—► 4-1430 Q Z j (T., 85-. c-85 N.11 U1 VD O 0 N N .- J1 O .P 00 85 1 �15 75-1 260—► f-155 80 115 �35 SW DSRTMOUTH _.... ............„,..) 00 00.n a1u N .-O N .-N 1997 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY P.M. PEAK PERIODS ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON 4 K JULY 1998 Mr. Tim Reed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page.8 A level-of-service (LOS) analysis was conducted to evaluate traffic operations at the study area intersections during both Friday p.m. peak periods. All LOS results described in this letter were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (a description of LOS and the criteria by which they are determined is available upon request). To ensure that this analysis was based on a reasonable worst-case scenario,the peak 1 5-minute flow rate during each peak period was used in the evaluation of all intersection LOS analysis. For this reason. the analysis reflects conditions that are only likely to occur during 15 minutes out of the peak periods. Traffic conditions during all other weekday time periods and throughout the weekend will likely operate better than described in this report. The results of the LOS analysis are shown in Table 2. For the signalized and all-way-stop controlled intersections, the delay, volume-to-capacity ratio, and the level-of-service are shown. The City of Tigard and ODOT generally require LOS "D"or better for signalized intersections. Similarly. LOS "E" or better is considered acceptable for unsignalized intersections. Table 2 1997 Existing Levels of Service Signalized/All-Way Stop Unsignalized Intersection Average Average Delay Critical Delay V/C (sec/veh) LOS Approach (sec/veh) LOS Friday P.M. Commuter Peak Hour(4:30-5:30 P.M.) Highway 99W ACT III Main Access 0.67 0.2 A Highway 99W.'SW 72nd Avenue 0.87 17.7 C SW 72nd Avenue/ACT 111 Access EB-LT 15.0 C SW 72nd Avenue/SW W Dartmouth Street >1.00 >45.0 F ii'ith Signal 0.66 22.3 C Friday P.M.Theater Peak Hour(6:30-7:30 P.M.) Highway 99W'ACT III Main Access 0.63 4.2 A Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue 0.69 13.4 B SW 72nd Avenue/ACT Ill Access EB-LT 13.0 C SW 72nd Avenue'SW Dartmouth Street >1.00 38.5 F With Signal 0.44 19.4 C __ _ EB•LT=Eastbuurd Leti-Tum As shown in Table 2, all intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service, with the exception of the all-way-stop controlled SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection which operates at LOS "F"during the Friday commuter peak hour(4:30 - 5:30 p.m.). It should be noted that the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection is planned for signalization as part of the Tri-County Center which was approved in June 1998. Previous studies conducted in the site vicinity (Future Shop Traffic Impact Analysis, Kimley-Horn, 1995) also revealed that the Kitte/son&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Mr. Tim Reed Project.2955 July 6, 1998 Page:9 intersection operates at a LOS "F" during an average weekday p.m. peak (i.e.. Monday through Thursday) as well. A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for this intersection and the results are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis (Existing Conditions) SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Actual Volume Minimum Required Warrant Met? Volume Warrant 1 Minimum Vehicular Volume(8th Highest Hour) Major Street 775 500 Yes Minor Street 405 150 Yes Warrant 2 Interruption of Continuous Traffic (8th Highest Hour) Major Street 775 750 Yes Minor Street 405 75 Yes Warrant 11 Peak Hour Volume Major Street 1,105 1,105 Yes Minor Street 580 175 Yes As shown in Table 3, a traffic signal is warranted at the SW Dartmouth Street/SW 72nd Avenue intersection today without the expansion of the ACT III Theater. Traffic Safety Accident records for the study intersections from 1992 through 1996 were obtained from ODOT and the City of Tigard and examined for existing safety concerns. The data indicates that there were 70 reported accidents in five years at the Highway 99W/ACT III Main Access intersection with no fatalities. The reported number of accidents corresponds to an average annual accident rate of 0.97 accidents per million entering vehicles(MEV). A rate of 1.0 generally suggests that an intersection should be examined for safety concerns and possible solutions. The total number of accidents per year has been steadily declining since 1992. In addition, the data does not suggest any apparent pattern among the reported accidents. The Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue intersection had 48 reported accidents over five years. In 1992, an accident resulted in a fatality due to a driver operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. The total number of accidents corresponds to an average accident rate of 0.62 accidents per MEV. The accident data at this intersection also did not show any pattern among the reported accidents. A total of eight accidents occurred at the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection between 1992 and 1996 with no fatalities. This results in an accident rate of approximately 0.21 accidents per MEV which also does not suggest a safety deficiency. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Mr. Tim Peed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page: 10 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The methodology used in determining the overall net impact of the proposed ACT III Theater expansion was based on the trip generation rates associated with the existing theater. The effects of traffic generated by the proposed expansion were analyzed as follows: • Background peak hour traffic estimates for 1999 were chosen as the basis for comparison. A three-percent growth factor and an evaluation of approved developments in the site vicinity were used to account for traffic growth in the area. • Based on the existing trip generation rates of the theater, the additional number of Friday peak period trips were estimated for the expansion. The additional site generated trips were added to the 1999 background volumes to evaluate traffic operations at the study intersections. • A queuing/stacking analysis was conducted at the existing ACT III access driveways on Highway 99W and SW 72nd Avenue as well as the proposed new access driveway to the main lot and north access to the overflow lot. • The internal circulation was evaluated for potential safety and/or operational deficiencies. • The proposed access locations were evaluated for potential safety and/or operational deficiencies. Planned Developments and Transportation Improvements According to the City of Tigard and ODOT staff. there are no planned transportation system improvements within the site vicinity. At the time the study began, only one approved development was planned to open in 1998. A 50.000 square-foot Future Shop was planned to be located on the east side of SW Dartmouth Street across from the existing COSTCO. Traffic volumes estimates for this development were obtained from the Future Shop Traffic Impact Study (Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc.. 1995). It is uncertain at this time if the Future Shop will be developed. In June 1998. the City of Tigard approved the development of the Tri-County Center. The Tri- County Center site is located southwest of the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection and includes 330,000 square-feet of shopping center use. At the time the scope for this study was developed with City of Tigard staff, the Tri-County development was not approved; thus. traffic volumes for the development were not included in the analysis summarized in this letter. However, because the peak traffic demand of the shopping center occurs earlier than the peak period of the movie theater, the addition of the shopping center is not expected to change the conclusions and recommendations of this study. As part of the Tri-County development, traffic signals will be constructed at the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersections. Additionally, SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue will be widened along the site frontage. Kitte/son&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon Mr. Tim Reed Project:2955 July 6. 1998 Page: 11 1999 Background Traffic Conditions The 1999 background traffic volumes were projected in order to account for continued growth in the area. A growth rate of three percent was applied to the existing traffic volumes shown in Figure 4. The growth rate was established based on a review of historical data along Highway 99W during the past five years.The estimated site-generated traffic from the proposed Future Shop was also included in the 1999 background volumes. In addition, the traffic volumes generated by the existing 2.739- seat theater are included in the 1999 background volumes. The resulting 1999 background traffic volumes for the study area intersections are shown in Figure 5. Table 4 shows the 1999 background traffic levels of service for both the Friday p.m. commuter peak hour and Friday p.m. theater peak hour. Table 4 1999 Background Traffic Level-of-Service Signalized/All-Way Stop Unsignalized intersection Average Average Delay Critical Delay V/C I (sec/veh) LOS Approach (sec/veh) LOS Friday P.M. Commuter Peak Hour(4:30-5:30 P.M.) Highway 99W/ACT Ill Main Access 0.69 0.2 B Hiehway 99W'SW 72nd Avenue 0.90 18.9 C SW 72nd Avenue/ACT 111 Access EB-LT 16.2 C SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street >1.00 >45.0 F With Signal 0.'0 22.8 C Friday P.M.Theater Peak Hour(6:30-7:30 P.M.) Highway 99W'ACT III Main Access 0.65 4.3 A Highway 99W'SW 72nd Avenue 0.71 13.9 B SW 72nd Avenue/ACT 111 Access EB-LT 14.1 C SW 72nd Avenue:SW Dartmouth Street >1.00 >45.0 F With Signal 0.4- 19.a C EB-LT-Eastbound Lett-Turn As shown in Table 4, all study area intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the exception of SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. As previously discussed, the intersection is planned for signalization as part of the Tri-County Center. As shown in the table, the installation of a traffic signal at this intersection will restore operations to an acceptable level-of- service. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Mr. Tim Reed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page: 12 Proposed Development Plans The proposed Tigard ACT III expansion would increase the existing seating capacity from 2.739 seats to 3.039 seats. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. As shown in Figure 2. an additional parking lot for the theater is proposed to the north of the wetlands and to the east of the existing Tri- Met lot. It is anticipated that this parking lot will primarily function as an overflow lot. Therefore. the existing parking lot will continue to serve the majority of patrons. A north access on SW 72nd Avenue is proposed to provide direct access to the overflow lot. The driveway will be located approximately 290 feet south of the existing McDonald's driveway and meets the City's 30-foot minimum spacing requirement. In addition. there are no conflicting access points on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue at the proposed driveway location. The proposed overflow lot access location was examined to determine whether adequate intersection sight distance is available. Based on the designated speed on SW 72nd Avenue, a minimum intersection sight distance of 300 feet is necessary for vehicles exiting onto SW 72nd Avenue from the overflow lot. Based on measurements taken in the field, it was concluded that a sight distance of 320 feet to the north is available at the access into the overflow lot. Therefore, adequate sight distance is provided at the proposed north access location. Trip Generation and Distribution Trip generation estimates for the proposed expansion were based on data collected at the existing Tigard ACT III Theatre on a typical Friday in December. Data received from ACT III revealed that the three highest months for ticket sales were July. August and December. Therefore, December represents a reasonable worst-case scenario. Table 5 shows the trip generation calculations for the existing theater. Table 5 Existing Trip Generation Rates Existing 2,739-Seat Theater Associated Trip Generation Rate Trips Trips/Seat Peak Period Seats Total In Out Total In Out P.M. Commuter Peak 2.739 480 280 200 0.17 0.10 0.07 P.M. Theater Peak 2,739 700 375 325 0.26 0.14 0.12 The trip generation rates shown in Table 5 were used to forecast the number of trips that will be generated by the 300-seat expansion. Table 6 shows the estimated Friday trip generation of the existing theater and the proposed theater expansion. For the purposes of this analysis. the total vehicle trips generated by the proposed expansion were based on the trip generation rates shown in Table 5. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon COMMUTER PEAK HOUR PG��\c' vv 4 :30 P.M.-5:30 P.M. Q ♦ NORTH , (NOT TO SCALE) <5 ■ 4--<5 <5� c,0 ‘n / > t ! v Q w p inoo ® U Z v v a n <S-11.. �I�<5 a Z 3 f VI I 10Th, ! on K/1/ Y� 1 ITE �, <5 51 <5� 10- q t v°v It v 41 lka. ov <51 • <5 t \ SW DARTMOUTH ST 0______,...9 THEATER PEAK HOUR QPG��\G� 1 6:30 P.M.-7:30 P.M. <5--o. -11—<5 <5-. �15 OPir qtr V N Q N.11 0 t Gil 0 _ U Z N U U f- Q n <5—* 4—<5 a z i/ 3 15x / N _ 4v_( % I1 ° v //i��% / <51 101 <s� 15� t , .� t alt <51 'L<5 t SW DARTMOUTH ST ,.._...:2 __.,2 , SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES (300-SEAT EXPANSION ONLY) ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION FIGURE j . TIGARD, OREGON 7 k JULY 1998 <9zD i Mr. Tim Reed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page. 14 Table 6 Trip Generation Calculations P.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Commuter Traffic Theater Traffic (4:30-5:30 P.M.) (6:30-7:30 P.M.) Condition Seats Total In Out Total In Out Existing Site 2.739 480 280 200 700 375 325 Proposed Expansion 300 55 30 25 80 45 35 Total 3.039 535 310 225 780 420 360 As shown in Table 6, the proposed expansion will generate approximately 55 trips during the commuter peak hour and 80 trips during the theater peak hour. The additional trips generated by the expansion were distributed to the roadway system in the study area based on distribution patterns associated with the existing ACT III. Figure 6 shows the assumed trip distribution pattern. The site-generated trips during the Friday p.m. peak hours are shown in Figure 7. Although it is reasonable to assume that the majority of patrons will park in the existing lot due to its proximity to the theater, for conservative purposes a small percentage of site generated traffic associated with the expansion was assigned to the proposed overflow lot that will be located to the north of the wetlands. 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATIONS The 1999 background traffic volumes shown in Figure 6 were added to the site-generated traffic shown in Figure 7 to arrive at the total Friday p.m. peak period traffic volumes. Figure 8 shows the traffic volumes used in the 1999 total traffic analysis. Table 7 shows the level-of-service at the study area intersections with the expansion of the ACT III site. As shown in Table 7,all intersections with the exception of SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the expansion of the Tigard ACT III. The SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection will continue to operate unacceptably until a traffic signal is installed. Comparing Table 7 with Table 6 (1999 Background Levels of Service), it is clear that the proposed expansion will have a negligible impact to the transportation system. No change in level of service is projected at any intersection. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon COMMUTER PEAK HOUR 4:30 P.M.-5:30 P.M. O'' NORTH A) kik 130-i k-55 (NOT TO SCALE) 1605 . --1835 100 165 00o > " t ( .41) 1ke. ® N Y N z N Lu8 n 1795 4-2010 ¢ z_ V al ui co \\::1125-..,44 ° ///S/////,' <51 35 <5� 70� t r 00 t t ornv yODv N 1 , 00 100 'L 60 415 4--285 205-x or-150 SW DARTMOUTH IINt , ST 000 mv+a M Lin ON toDo THEATER PEAK HOUR ON ,l1 6:30 P.M.-7:30 P.M. Q loo 1 X50 1240—* 4-1385 85-N c110 i qt ( I)00 Q ��Ao 'nom- N N.! Q W N z `/ N. U 1365-0. 4-1475 Q Q 0 Lel 195 / / � �N 1 ‘1 (f.) 0 CT ,1 �ii/i l/ <s 851 <5� R 95� t(-----0-`4),'S ` t N 1 V,,, 411E 0� o� M 1 '55 - 95 N 300 4-190 130...,41 ir--35 SW DARTMOUTH '9\ t ( ST cow) M N N N 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY P.M. PEAK PERIODS ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON 8 mil, JULY 1998 COMMUTER PEAK HOUR 1'C, \(' C, \G `.- 4:30 P.M.-5:30 P.M. Q NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 000 / ¢ oon 77.•� l � z - v z ../ lk. 1795--• 4-2010 < z 3 -i 1` cn 130 55 1151 Zr 1605 4--1835 tr...) 4 100 R f (I c155 ✓/%I// , )1i ,, V1OU] N O N O O O aDV 0 .� 1k. In " 11 1001 '`6O 415 4-285 301 205 Thi or * SW DARTMOUTH 60 I ( ST II1 C,au a o 0 -n m,n a THEATER PEAK HOUR P� `G 6:30 P.M.-7:30 P.M. Q / ON 0 0 1 � � v' z �r ® w Z U (' � 1001 Aso cp v z 1240—+ 4---1385 1180 �ta75 a a N 85- c95 180 .1 � � � '� (' Th 0 O 0 o n o 300-► 4-190 130 000 M 0 N 1999 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRIDAY P.M. PEAK PERIODS ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION FIGURE 1117 , TIGARD, OREGON 5 ik JULY 1998 Mr Tim Peed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page: 18 Table 7 1999 Total Traffic Levels of Service Signalized/All-Way Stop U nsignalized Intersection Average Average Delay Critical Delay V/C (sec/veh) LOS Approach (sec/veh) LOS Friday P.M.Commuter Peak Hour(4:30-5:30 P.M.) Highway 99W/ACT III Main Access 0.69 0.3 A Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue 0.90 19.2 C SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Access EB-LT 16.6 C SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III North Access EB 7.9 B SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street >1.00 >45.0 F With Signal 0.'l 23.0 C Friday P.M.Theater Peak Hour(6:30-7:30 P.M.) Highway 99W'ACT III Main Access 0.66 4.5 B Highway 99W/SW 72nd Avenue 0.72 14.3 B SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Access EB-LT 15.5 C SW 72nd Avenue/ACT Ill North Access EB 6.1 B SW 72nd Avenue./SW Dartmouth Street >1.00 >45.0 F With Signal 0.49 19.5 C EB-LT=Eastbound Left•Tum:EB=Eastbound ON-SITE CIRCULATION The proposed site plan and existing roadway system were examined to ensure acceptable on-site circulation and adequate queue storage. An examination of the site plan revealed the existing on-site circulation has been modified to improve the circulation throughout the parking lot. Pedestrian access to the theater will be provided by the existing sidewalk along the Main Access at Highway 99W and by sidewalks that will be constructed along the site frontage as part of half-street improvements that will be made on SW 72nd Avenue. In addition. a pedestrian bridge connection will be constructed from the overflow lot through the main lot to provide safe pedestrian access directly to the theater. Left Turn Lane Warrant Analysis Left turn lane warrant analyses were performed on SW 72nd Avenue at the existing and proposed ACT III north access driveway. The results of the analysis determined that a left-turn lane is warranted at the existing main access driveway. Although a left turn lane is not warranted at the Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Mr. 77m Reed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page: 19 proposed access to the overflow lot. a center turn lane will be provided along the property frontage. RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS As part of the expansion of the theater.ACT III will construct half-street improvements on SW 72nd Avenue along the site frontage. According to the Tigard Triangle Street Plan Design Standards. SW 72nd Avenue will be widened to a 92-foot right-of-way in the future. The recommended cross- section for SW 72nd Avenue includes four 11-foot travel lanes (two travel lanes in each direction). a 12-foot center turn lane/median, 5-foot bicycle lanes, and a 13-foot sidewalk and planter strip. ACT III will construct a 46-foot improvement from the center line of the existing roadway. These improvements are shown in Figure 9. As shown,the improvements will include a 14-foot center tum lane.an 18-foot southbound through lane and a 13-foot sidewalk. The through lane will be striped to include a bicycle lane when future bicycle facility improvements are made to SW 72nd Avenue to the south of the site frontage. When properties to the east of SW 72nd Avenue develop, the roadway will be widened to a full four-lane facility with center median. Two additional improvements within ACT III's property are designated in the Tigard Triangle Street Plan Design Standards: the extension of Atlanta Street and the construction of a"backage road." According to the plan,Atlanta Street should be extended from SW 68th Avenue to SW Dartmouth Street. The plan designates this extension directly in front of the existing ACT III theatre which will bisect the existing ACT III property. separating the parking lot from the building. If Atlanta Street were constructed through the theater, the roadway would have to be constructed approximately 10 feet above the floor of the existing building in order to maintain adequate sight distance. In addition. no access to or from Atlanta Street in front of the theatre would be provided to the existing parking areas because of the topographic constraints. Finally. the right-of-way dedication required as part of the Atlanta Street extension would not allow ACT III to meet its minimum parking requirement. even without the expansion of the existing building. For these reasons. construction of the roadway and/or dedication of right-of-way for the Atlanta Street extension is not recommended as part of the ACT III expansion. Further, it is clear that the dedication requirements are not roughly proportional to the proposed 300-seat increase in the theatre. According to the Tigard Triangle Street Plan Design Standards,a local collector backage road should also be constructed through the proposed ACT III overflow and Tri-Met park-and-ride lots. This backage road is proposed as a 60-foot right-of-way that includes two 11-foot travel lanes and two 8-foot on-street parking lanes with sidewalks and planter strips. Again, this proposed roadway requires a substantial right-of-way dedication that bisects the parking lots. A dedication of right-of- way for the backage road will not allow ACT III to meet its minimum parking requirements and will also significantly reduce the parking provided in the Tri-Met parking lot. Like the proposed Atlanta Street extension, the dedication requirements for the backage road are not recommended as part of the ACT III theatre expansion and are not roughly proportion to the proposed theatre expansion. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon 0 NORTH • I • • k E©GE OF PAVEMENT :_ WITH HALF STREET .'. , �a�IMPROVEMENTS co . . )1 t F r . ::. . ., r LINE -- - - 1t. —• r r c { _ t ..r .. -' �.� i f .. , - . t!.ef L -te: to v s . - .L C :b:uN r 1.r.- - . .. ... ... _ •ateo i. : , .,w N. SW 72ND AVE SCHEMATIC DESIGN ACT III THEATERS FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON K� JULY 1998 ■L1 DWGS\2955F009.CDR Mr. Tim Reed Project:2955 July 6, 1998 Page:21 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the traffic analysis described in this letter, the proposed Tigard ACT III Theatre expansion can be constructed with minimal impacts on the surrounding transportation system. The following conclusions and recommendations can be drawn from the analysis: • Under existing conditions,the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection operates at an unacceptable LOS "F" during both the Friday p.m. commuter peak and theater peak hours. A traffic signal is warranted at this intersection today without the expansion of the theater, and the intersection is planned for signalization as part of the Tri-County Center development. • All study area intersections, with the exception of the unsignalized SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection, will operate at acceptable levels of service under both background and total traffic conditions. No change in level of service is projected at any intersection as a result of the expansion. • The additional access on SW 72nd Avenue is recommended to improve operations at existing driveways and internal circulation during peak periods of particularly high theater demand. • The proposed access point on SW 72nd Avenue will meet the City's minimum driveway spacing requirements. In addition, there are no driveways on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue that will conflict with the operations of the theater access. • Adequate sight distance is available at the proposed north access location. I trust that this letter adequately addresses the transportation-related issues associated with the proposed Tigard ACT III expansion in Tigard, Oregon. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. , Dina M. Sykora ��,PRQFa is A. Kuhn Butorac, P.E. Engineering Associate c' <" NE` 6ur'2 Senior Engineer ct-4' 58353 'f Attachments: ,�•- _"',I� Manual Traffic Volume Counts Level-of-Service Analysis Worksheets / Signal Warrant Analysis G(�q "; ' Left-Turn Lane Warrant Analysis ANN s\Y EXPIRES: I t K/tte/son&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon Traffic Count Data INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT L 72ND AVENUE AT DARTMOUTH STREET I I� B(I) A T= . 9% P=.951 N 1,392 • DATE OF COUNT: 12/12/97 O 1428 DAY OF WEEK: Fri R 40 202 150 TIME STARTED: 16:00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :15 H 4-477 <J L► 4-507 A 85 J L62 T= . 696- T= 1.6% 336 —► 4-238 P=. 917 P=.839 207 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME 41 ( 199 ♦ r►* T=°%TRUCKS BY APPROACH P=PHF BY APPROACH 620 —► 533 —► BKEL 199 281 47 Peak Hour • 1608 17:00-18:00 Traffic Smithy �► - i T= .6% P=.927 1527 TEV=2046 (503) 641-6333 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME FROM - TOOOD —* •- 4J I L► �1 1 r► •- A i l L ALL 16:00-16 :05 7 32 8 3 13 13 9 20 3 4 21 0 133 16 :05-16:10 22 33 13 3 13 11 18 20 7 8 17 1 166 16 :10-16:15 15 40 13 2 13 7 13 20 4 10 14 3 154 16:15-16:20 18 34 5 6 15 11 17 14 6 10 17 6 159 16:20-16 :25 17 38 9 8 19 8 11 18 1 12 18 2 161 16:25-16 :30 14 37 8 2 9 10 14 24 2 10 24 2 156 16:30-16:35 15 33 9 9 10 8 12 16 2 13 20 3 150 16:35-16:40 14 32 6 6 16 15 10 19 1 13 22 6 160 16:40-16:45 18 30 9 8 22 16 13 28 1 14 21 4 184 16:45-16:50 23 37 8 6 19 11 12 21 4 8 18 3 170 16:50-16:55 16 37 9 0 23 13 10 21 7 10 19 4 169 16:55-17:00 15 25 9 0 11 8 14 24 3 16 23 4 152 17:00-17:05 13 29 4 5 19 11 15 30 4 10 21 8 169 17:05-17:10 14 33 5 4 15 16 14 26 7 14 15 6 169 17:10-17:15 17 29 7 2 16 13 12 26 2 17 24 6 171 17:15-17:20 16 31 3 5 15 17 21 26 2 12 24 6 178 17:20-17:25 12 27 10 3 15 16 19 27 2 11 18 4 164 17:25-17:30 15 31 10 4 14 13 18 24 3 7 19 4 162 17:30-17:35 13 31 9 2 17 10 16 16 6 23 17 5 165 17:35-17:40 14 25 3 3 14 12 21 23 2 25 18 2 162 17:40-17:45 19 26 5 0 22 13 15 21 4 25 17 8 175 17:45-17:50 20 24 13 4 18 12 10 20 0 25 23 2 171 17:50-17:55 23 26 9 7 20 4 19 22 6 22 21 8 187 17:55-18 :00 23 24 7 1 17 13 19 20 9 16 21 3 173 18:00-18:05 10 28 22 2 16 7 10 17 7 26 21 2 168 18:05-18 :10 13 27 6 7 16 8 20 20 2 19 26 4 168 18 :10-18 :15 16 27 4 5 19 5 10 17 3 12 25 2 145 Total Survey 432 826 223 107 436 301 392 580 100 392 544 108 4441 PHF .75 .9 .73 .83 .84 .82 .86 .86 .78 .69 .9 .77 .959 % Trucks :2 .8 .4 0 1.6 .3 1 .3 0 3.6 • 0 2.8 .9 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 194 408 106 53 183 131 153 245 41 128 234 38 1914 16:15-17:15 194 394 88 56 194 140 154 267 40 147 242 54 1970 16:30-17:30 188 374 89 52 195 157 170 288 38 145 244 58 1998 16:45-17:45 187 361 82 34 200 153 187 285 46 178 233 60 2006 17:00-18 :00 199 336 85 40 202 150 199 281 47 207 238 62 2046 17:15-18 :15 194 327 101 43 203 130 198 253 46 223 250 50 2018 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT � � -7 72ND AVENUE AT DARTMOUTH STREET • T= .3% P=.86 N I 1 258 DATE OF COUNT: 12/12/97 • 0 243 DAY OF WEEK: Fri R 41 119 98 TIME STARTED: 18:30 T H -306 -4-) 1 L. --229 • TIME ENDED: 20 :00 • 59 J L41 T= .5% T= 1.3% 262 —► +-155 P=. 832 P=.795 115 4-1 1 33 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME • r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH � �► P=PHF BY APPROACH 436 —► 383 —► BKEM 110 143 23 Peak Hour 1267 • 18 :30-19:30 Traffic Smithy + T= 0% P=.734 1276 TEV=1199 (503) 641-6333 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • • • • FROM - TO —► J .4J i Lo. -'41 1 r► r 4- L ALL 18:30-18 :35 12 31 4 4 10 7 8 14 1 4 15 3 113 18 :35-18 :40 4 28 4 2 11 9 8 11 0 0 11 5 93 18:40-18 :45 15 28 5 1 8 5 8 17 3 5 18 3 116 18 :45-18:50 17 23 5 6 6 7 14 16 4 5 13 5 121 18 :50-18 :55 10 15 4 4 9 11 12 19 1 2 12 4 103 18:55-19:00 10 25 4 6 7 8 10 10 2 2 20 6 110 19:00-19:05 6 19 5 1 10 7 13 13 0 6 15 5 100 19:05-19:10 13 20 4 4 10 11 4 6 4 0 5 4 85 19 :10-19:15 6 12 7 3 17 10 6 6 6 1 15 1 90 19 :15-19:20 8 19 8 3 10 7 11 9 0 3 11 1 90 19:20-19:25 6 18 6 4 10 7 10 11 0 2 12 1 87 19:25-19:30 8 24 3 3 11 9 6 11 2 3 8 3 91 19:30-19:35 11 15 4 0 11 3 7 7 2 2 11 2 75 '.9:35-19 :40 11 17 4 1 9 9 11 7 0 6 12 3 90 .9:40-19:45 12 17 4 2 7 3 9 7 0 1 12 3 77 19:45-19:50 13 16 5 1 8 5 10 5 0 1 5 1 70 19:50-19:55 12 20 4 3 4 7 15 5 0 2 5 0 77 19:55-20 :00 9 11 3 3 8 7 7 10 0 6 6 1 71 Total Survey 183 358 83 51 166 132 169 184 25 51 206 51 1659 PHF .68 .75 .7 .64 .8 .B8 .76 .69 .57 .69 .82 .68 . 881 % Trucks .5 .3 1.2 0 .6 0 0 0 0 5. 9 .5 0 .5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pees 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 18:30-19:30 115 262 59 41 119 98 110 143 23 33 155 41 1199 18:45-19 :45 118 224 58 37 117 92 113 122 21 33 146 38 1119 19:00-20 :00 115 208 57 28 115 85 109 97 14 33 117 25 1003 1997 Existing Levels-of-Service Worksheets • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:09 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:09 1997 Existing Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 1997 Existing Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III SIGNAL94/TEAPACCV1 11.4] - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT Key: VOLUMES -- > vph - vph vph -- vph 20 30 10 WIDTHS .0 12.0 .0 v LANES N-RT 20 .91 22 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 0 N-TH 30 .91 33 LT+TN+RT 66 1 1.00 66 .17 .33 / I ` I\ 0 .0 0 / \ N-LT 10 .91 11 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -- 1945 24.0 2 E-RT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 1945 .91 2137 TH 2137 2 1.05 2244 .00 .00 0 .0 0 / + / 0 .0 0 North E-LT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 1740 24.0 2 -- S-RT 30 .91 33 RT 33 1 1.00 33 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 115 .0 0 \ S-LT 80 .91 88 LT 88 2 1.03 91 1.00 .00 80 0 30 Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 24.0 .0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N 1 W-RT 115 .91 126 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 2 0 1 OVERLP N N N N W-TH 1740 .91 1912 TH+RT 2038 2 1.05 2140 .00 .06 LEADLAG L0 LD W-LT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf:Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.41 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TN LT RT TH LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- V V Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y I Y 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 N-LT+TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .855 .950 1.00 1513 E- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 Sq 31 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 I `*/*` S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 * * * S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 * * /I\ <* * *> <**** W- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .991 1.000 1.00 3691 v North <* +> +> ++++> I * + + ++++ * + + v G/C= .036 G/C= .057 G/C= .821 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 5.0" G= 8.0" G= 115.0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= 6.4% OFF=15.OX OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=140 sec G=128.0 sec = 91.4% Y=12.0 sec = 8.6% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S COEXMAIN 1-2-98 5:18p Page 1 of 2 KITTELSON It ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/05/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 08:37:35 1997 Existing Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd SIGNAL94/TEAPAC N1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .74 Vehicle Delay 23.7 Level of Service C Sq 16 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 I LD/LD /i\ <+ + +> _ <**** V **** ++++ V **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> * + + + ++++ ++++ * + + + v V G/C= .200 G/C= .079 G/C= .014 G/C= .593 G= 28.0" G= 11.0" G= 2.0" G= 83.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=22.9% OFF=33.6% OFF=37.9% C=140 sec G=124.0 sec = 88.6% Y=16.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane 'Width/I g/C Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used IC (vph) lE Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 42.3 E+ ITH+RT 12/1 1 .371 1 .207 1 1 I 164 I 134 1 .698 I 46.2 I E 0 321+I 209 fti S Approach 48.8 E+ RT 12/1 LT 12/1 I .404 I .207 I 1 I 103 I 124 I .976 I 96.0 I*F+I 193 ftl E Approach 23.1 C.893 I LT+RTI 24/2 I .330 I .086 2101 2225 1987 I .528 I 47.6 I*C 144 ft W Approach 14.8 B RT 12/1 LT 12/1 I .340 I .129 1 2311 1 2196 1 11129 I .566 I 45.4 I*E+I 221 ft TH 24/2 .520 S COEX72 1-5-98 8:37a Page 3 of 3 97EXCOM.CMD Mon Jan 5, 1998 09:10:35 Page 3-1 97EXCOM.CMD Mon Jan 5, 1998 09:10:35 Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1997 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER 1997 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #11 SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Access Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Cycle (sec): 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.986 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 475.8 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I II II II + Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign II II II I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Base Vol: 90 430 0 0 295 45 30 0 60 0 0 0 II II II I Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 90 430 0 0 295 45 30 0 60 0 0 0 Base Vol: 170 370 40 135 175 45 90 375 190 145 245 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Initial Bse: 170 370 40 135 175 45 90 375 190 145 245 60 PHF Volume: 99 473 0 0 324 49 33 0 66 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Final Vol.: 99 473 0 0 324 49 33 0 66 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 173 378 41 138 179 46 92 383 194 148 250 61 11 11 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjusted Volume Module: II Reduced Vol: 173 378 41 138 179 46 92 383 194 148 250 61 Grade: 0% 0% OX 0% PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 % Cycle/Cars: 0-00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx Final Vol.: 173 378 41 138 179 46 92 383 194 148 250 61 PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 II II II I Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Sat/Lane: 211 211 211 234 234 234 245 245 245 246 246 246 Adj Vol.: 100 473 0 0 324 49 33 0 67 0 0 0 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 II II 1 Lanes: 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.20 Critical Gap lModule: II Final Sat.: 211 190 21 234 234 234 245 245 245 246 198 48 MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II II II I Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx XxxxX xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5i )xxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Ana ysis Module: I ll I Vol/Sat: 0.82 1.99 1.99 0.59 0.76 0.20 0.38 1.56 0.79 0.60 1.26 1.26 Capacity Module: Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Cnflict Vol: 374 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 920 xxxx 349 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1138 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 310 xxxx 922 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service I II II ce Module: Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.88 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 22.5 1893 1893 9.4 18.3 2.1 4.2 380 20.3 9.8 122 122.0 Move Cap.: 1138 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 273 xxxx 922 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.5 1893 1893 9.4 18.3 2.1 4.2 380 20.3 9.8 122 122.0 Level Of Service Module: I II II I LOS by Move: D F F 8 C A A F D B F F Stopped Del: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.0 xxxx 4.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * • * * C * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpOel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDet: 0.6 0.0 7.8 0.0 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S 97EXCOM-OUT 1-5-98 9:10a Page 2 of 2 :G Mon Dec 22 , 1997 11 : 19 : 49 Page 1-1 -`°"� KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1997 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ;* ************************************************************************* !rs.;ction #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St :*++************************************************************************* .e sec) : 100 Critical Vol ./Cap. (X) : 0 . 662 _ .me (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 22 . 3 .mal Cycle : 55 Level Of Service : C N t* r************************************************************************* :c :h: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 115 meat : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R o� a. :z L: Protected Protected Protected Protected It : Include Include Include Include . Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 _ 1 II II II I ime Module : s "cl : 170 370 40 135 175 45 90 375 190 145 245 60 of Adj : 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 :_ 1 Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ad Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • ByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 1 Fut: 170 370 40 135 175 45 90 375 190 145 245 60 ✓ 2-dj : 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 "'j : 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0. 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 lume: 173 378 41 138 179 46 92 383 194 148 250 61 u., Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uced Vol : 173 378 41 138 179 46 92 383 194 148 250 61 '.j : 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 .j : 1. 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 al Vol. : 173 378 41 138 179 46 92 383 194 148 250 61 1 II 11 II 1 u .tion Flow Module: /_ .ne: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ustment: 0 . 95 0 . 99 0 . 99 0. 95 1 . 00 0 . 85 0 . 95 1. 00 0 . 85 0 . 95 0 . 97 0 . 97 E • 1. 00 0 . 90 0 . 10 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 80 0 . 20 M E Sat. : 1805 1697 184 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 1482 361 v I II II II I ity Analysis Module: , It: 0 .10 0 .22 0 .22 0 . 08 0 . 09 0 . 03 0 . 05 0 . 20 0 . 12 0 . 08 0 .17 0 . 17 L loves: **** **** **** **** : en/Cycle : 0 .23 0 .34 0 .34 0 . 12 0 . 22 0 .22 0 . 10 0 .30 0 . 30 0 . 12 0 .33 0 . 33 i a/Cap: 0 .42 0 . 66 0 . 66 0 . 66 0 .42 0 . 13 0 . 51 0 . 66 0 . 39 0 . 66 0 . 51 0 . 51 I 11 II II I -el Of Service Module : . /Veh: 21 . 7 20 . 1 20 . 1 32 . 6 21. 9 20 . 0 29 .7 21 . 6 18 . 0 31 . 9 ' 18 . 1 18 .1 )elAdj : 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1 . 00 L..1/Veh: 21 . 7 20 . 1 20 . 1 32 . 6 21. 9 20 . 0 29 .7 21. 6 18 . 0 31 . 9 18 . 1 18 .1 nip: 4 9 1 4 4 1 3 10 4 4 6 1 r *************************************************************************** I iffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR THFYMAIN 1-7-98 4_351, _ g Pa e_2_of 2 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/07/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/07/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 16:35:22 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 16:35:22 1997 Existing Theater Peak - HWY 99/ACT I11 1997 Existing Theater Peak - HWY 99/ACT III SIGNAL94/TEAPACCV1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPACtV1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Intersection Averages: pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane Degree of Saturation (v/c) .60 Vehicle Delay 9.5 Level of Service 8+ ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- vph vPhg -- Sq 31 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 * N-LT+TH+RT 115 1514 .076 .114 173 .665 **/* * E- TH 1650 3725 .443 .757 2821 .585 * * * 5. RT 55 1583 .035 .200 317 .174 /Ik <* v *> <**** v S- LT Pri. 136 3539 .038 .064 228 .596 * North <* +> +> ++++> W- TH+RT 1737 3659 .475 .757 2770 .627 * 1 * + + ++++ * + + v Cycle Length, C 140 sec Sum(v/s) _ .589 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .630 G/C= .057 G/C= .107 G/C= .750 G= 8.0" G= 15.0" G= 105.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet OFF= .OX OFF= 8.6% OFF=22.1% Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan C=140 sec G=128.0 sec = 91.4X Y=12.0 sec = 8.6X Ped= .0 sec = .0% pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - l Lane (Width/l g/C Service Rate Adj I l HCM I L 190% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used QC (vph) )E Volume v/c Delay S 1 Queue N-LT+TH+RT .665 .114 45.2 1.00 173 16 6.25 51.4 E > 51.4 E E- TH .585 .757 5.6 1.00 2821 12 .18 5.8 8+ N Approach 51.4 E > 5.8 8+ S- RT .174 .200 35.3 1.00 317 16 .03 35.3 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 1 .342 1 .114 1 1 137 115 .665 51.4 *E 1 200 ft1 S- LT .596 .064 48.4 1.00 228 16 3.01 51.4 E > 46.8 E+ W- TH+RT .627 .757 6.0 1.00 2770 12 .25 6.2 6+ S Approach 46.8 E+ > 6.2 8+ Cycle=14 .602 > 9.5 8+ l LT i 24/2 i .328 i .064 1 1 179 136 .596 51.4 i*E l 125 fti E Approach 5.8 6+ TH 1 24/2 1 .513 1 .757 2821 1 2821 1650 .585 5.8 J*B+g 394 ft1 W Approach 6.2 B+ TH+RT1 24/2 1 .534 1 .757 2770 1 2770 1737 .627 6.2 1 B+1 415 ftl S 5 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:16:50 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:16:50 1997 Existing Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 1997 Existing Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT I Key: VOLUMES -- > -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- 115 60 100 WIDTHS .0 12.0 12.0 v LANES N-RT 115 .90 128 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 1 N-TH 60 .90 67 TH+RT 195 1 1.00 195 .00 .66 \ 50 .0 0 N-LT 100 .90 111 LT 111 1 1.00 111 1.00 .00 / I \ /I\ -- 1345 24.0 2 E-RT 50 .90 56 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 1345 .90 1494 TH+RT 1550 2 1.05 1627 .00 .04 95 12.0 1 / + / 85 24.0 2 North E-LT 85 .90 94 LT 94 2 1.03 97 1.00 .00 I 1205 24.0 2 -- S-RT 185 .90 206 RT 206 1 1.00 206 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 65 .90 72 TH 72 1 1.00 72 .00 .00 85 12.0 1 \ S-LT 75 .90 83 LT 83 1 1.00 83 1.00 .00 75 65 185 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. I 12.0 12.0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 85 .90 94 RT 94 1 1.00 94 .00 1.00 1 1 1 OVERLP Y Y Y Y W-TH 1205 .90 1339 TH 1339 2 1.05 1406 .00 .00 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 95 .90 106 LT 106 1 1.00 106 1.00 .00 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y V 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- V Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- V V V 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- V Y Y 4 4 4 N- TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .902 1.000 1.00 1679 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .703 1.00 1310 Sq 16 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 I E- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .995 1.000 1.00 3705 LD/LD E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 + + + + + + **** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 /1\ <+ + +> - - <**** S- TH 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 1863 v **** S- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .329 1.00 613 ++++ v **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 * + + + ++++ ++++ W- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 * + + + v v W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 G/C= .182 G/C= .081 G/C= .027 G/C= .601 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 27.0" G= 12.0" G= 4.0" G= 89.0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0X OFF=20.9% OFF=31.8X OFF=37.2% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=148 sec G=132.0 sec = 89.2% Y=16.0 sec = 10.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S i ~ THEX72 1-2-98 5:16p Page 1 of 3 IJIEX77 1-7-98 5116p - Page_2of 3 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:16:50 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:16:50 1997 Existing Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 1997 Existing Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Supplemental LT-Factor Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Approach Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Input/Calculation N-LT E-LT S-LT W-LT pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp C - Cycle Length 148.0000 .0000 148.0000 .0000 -- -- -- vph vphg -- vph G - Actual Green Time 27.0000 .0000 27.0000 .0000 p g -Effective Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 N- TH+RT 195 1679 .116 .189 318 .613 go - Opp. Effective Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 N- LT Pri. 111 1310 .085 .189 248 .448 N - Number of Lanes 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 E- TH+RT 1627 3705 .439 .608 2253 .722 * vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 111.0000 .0000 83.0000 .0000 E- LT Pri. 97 3539 .027 .088 311 .312 PLT - Proportion of LT 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 PLTo - Prop, of Opp. LT (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 S- RT 206 1583 .130 .297 471 .437 vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate 72.0000 .0000 195.0000 .0000 S- TH 72 1863 .039 .189 352 .205 tL - Lost Time 3.0000 .0000 3.0000 .0000 S- LT Pri. 83 613 .135 .189 116 .716 * LTC - Left Turns per Cycle 4.5633 .0000 3.4122 .0000 U- RT 94 1583 .059 .662 1048 .090 Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 2.9600 .0000 8.0167 .0000 W- TH 1406 3725 .377 .662 2467 .570 Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 W- LT Pri. 106 1770 .060 .142 251 .422 * gf - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 qro - Opposing Queue Ratio .8108 .0000 .8108 .0000 Cycle Length, C 148 sec Sum(v/s) _ .634 gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 2.0000 .0000 11.5794 .0000 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .675 gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green 26.0000 .0000 16.4206 .0000 fs - LT Satur. Factor (9-17) .8300 .0000 .7531 .0000 PL - Proportion of LT (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 5.7897 .0000 PTHo - Prop. TN in Opp. (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan EL1 - TR Equivalent for LT 1.3200 .0000 1.7813 .0000 pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS fmin - Minimum Value for fLT .1429 .0000 .1429 .0000 -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - fm - LT Factor for LT (9-17) .7035 .0000 .3292 .0000 fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group .7035 .0000 .3292 .0000 N- TH+RT .613 .189 41.8 1.00 318 16 2.47 44.3 E+ N- LT .448 .189 40.4 1.00 248 16 .89 41.3 E+ > 43.2 E+ E- TH+RT .722 .608 15.4 1.00 2253 12 .62 16.0 C+ E- LT .312 .088 48.1 1.00 311 12 .15 48.3 E+ > 17.8 C+ 5- RT .437 .297 31.9 1.00 471 16 .43 32.4 D+ s- TH .205 .189 38.5 1.00 352 16 .04 38.5 D 5- LT .716 .189 42.8 1.00 116 16 12.34 55.1 E > 38.8 D W- RT .090 .662 6.8 1.00 1048 12 .00 6.8 B+ U- TH .570 .662 10.3 1.00 2467 12 .18 10.5 8 W- LT .422 .142 44.1 1.00 251 12 .53 44.6 E+ > 12.5 B Cycle=148" Int Total .599 > 19.5 C+ S -- - l3 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:16:50 1997 Existing Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .60 Vehicle Delay 19.5 Level of Service C+ Sq 16 Phase 1• 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 • LD/LD + + + **** /I\ <+ + +>- <**** -y **** ++++ y **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> * + + + ++++ ++++ * + + + y y G/C= .182 G/C= .081 G/C= .027 G/C= .601 G= 27.0" G= 12.0" G= 4.0" G= 89.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=20.9% OFF=31.8X OFF=37.2% C=148 sec G=132.0 sec = 89.2% Y=16.0 sec = 10.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 1 Lane (Width/1 g/C Service Rate Adj i I HCM 1 L 190% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used 2C (vph) 2E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 43.2 E+ 1 LT 12/1 12/1 1 .363 1 .189 11 211 1 111 1 .448 1 41.3 1 E +1 187 ft1 • S Approach 38.8 D I LT 1 12/1 I .385 ( .189 I 1 ( 312 89 206 83 I .716 I 55.1 (*E+I 140 ft E Approach 17.8 C+ 1 LT 24/2 24/2 1 .342 1 .088 1 2114 1 1 2253 260 1 1627 7 1 .312 1 48.3 1*E+1 663 2 ftl W Approach 12.5 B RT LT 1 12//1 I .354 I .142 1 2381 1 2214 1 1106 ' .422 I 44.6 I*E+I 1 9 66 ft S THEX72 1-2-98 5:16p Page 3 of 3 97EXGEN.CMD Mon Jan 5, 1998 09:10:51 Page 3-1 97EXGEN.CMD Mon Jan 5, 1998 09:10:51 Page 4-1 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1997 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR OF THEATER 1997 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR OF THEATER Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #11 SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Access Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Cycle (sec): 1 Critical Vot./Cap. (X): 1.164 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.5 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: E Movement: L - T - R L , T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Control: I Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: II II II ' Lanes: 11 0 0 1 0 II 1 0 1 0 1 II 1 0 1 0 .1 II 1 0 0 1 0 1 Base Vol: 90 250 0 0 185 45 75 0 80 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 90 250 0 0 185 45 75 0 80 0 0 0 Base Vot: 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Initial Bse: 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 PHF Volume: 114 316 0 0 234 57 95 0 101 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Final Vol.: 114 316 0 0 234 57 95 0 101 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 125 227 28 114 142 45 97 295 131 40 176 63 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjusted Volume Module: II II II I Reduced Vol: 125 227 28 114 142 45 97 295 131 40 176 63 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx Final Vol.: 125 227 2811 114 142 4511 97 295 13111 40 176 631 PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Sat/Lane: 219 219 219 240 240 240 271 271 271 228 228 228 Adj Vol.: 115 316 0 0 234 57 96 0 102 0 0 0 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Critical Gap1Module: II II II I Lanes: 1.00 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.26 Final Sat.: 219 195 2411 240 240 24011 271 271 27111 228 168 601 MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Analysis Nodule: Vol/Sat: 0.57 1.16 1.16 0.47 0.59 0.19 0.36 1.09 0.48 0.18 1.05 1.05 Capacity Module: II II II I Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Cnflict Vol: 291 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 693 xxxx 263 xxxx xxxx xxxxx II I Potent Cap.: 1246 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 420 xxxx 1019 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service II Module: Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.89 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay/Veh: 8.7 83.5 83.5 6.1 9.5 2.0 3.9 62.6 6.3 1.9 53.7 53.7 Move Cap.: 1246 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 373 xxxx 1019 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Level Of Service Module: II II II I AdjDel/Veh: 8.7 83.5 83.5 6.1 9.5 2.0 3.9 62.6 6.3 1.9 53.7 53.7 LOS by Move: B F F B B A A F B A F F Stopped Del: 3.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.0 xxxx 3.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 0.8 0.0 8.3 0.0 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittetson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S i 97EXGEM.OUT 1-5-98 9:10a Page 2 of 2 MITIG8 Mon Dec 22, 1997 11 : 19 : 15 Page 1-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1997 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR OF THEATER Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0 .437 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 19 . 4 Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control : Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights : Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 I Volume Module : II IJ � � Base Vol : 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 Growth Adj : 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1.00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?- .tial Fut : 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1.00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1-.__ Adj : 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 .88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 .88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0. 88 PHF Volume: 125 227 28 114 142 45 97 295 131 40 176 63 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol : 125 227 28 114 142 45 97 295 131 40 176 63 PCE Adj : 1. 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 MLF Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 Final Vol . : 125 227 28 114 142 45 97 295 131 40 176 63 I II II I I Saturation Flow Module : Sat/Lane : 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0 . 95 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 95 1 .00 0 . 85 0 . 95 1 .00 0 . 85 0 . 95 0 . 96 0 . 96 Lanes : 1. 00 0 . 89 0 . 11 1.00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 0 .74 0 . 26 Final Sat . : 1805 1658 204 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 1343 481 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat : 0. 07 0 . 14 0 . 14 0 . 06 0 . 07 0 . 03 0 . 05 0 .16 0 . 08 0 . 02 0 . 13 0. 13 Crit Moves : **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle : 0 .22 0 . 31 0 .31 0 . 14 0 .24 0 . 24 0 . 12 0 .37 0 . 37 0 . 05 0 .30 0 .30 Volume/Cap: 0 .31 0 .44 0 .44 0 .44 0 .31 0 .12 0 .44 0 .42 0 .22 0 .42 0 .44 0 .44 I II II II 1 Level Of Service Module : Delay/Veh: 21 .3 18 . 0 18 . 0 26. 0 20.4 19 .3 27 .2 15 .4 14 . 0 31 .4 18 . 6 18 . 6 User DelAdj : 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 74-iDel/Veh: 21 .3 18 . 0 18 . 0 26 . 0 20 .4 19 .3 27.2 15 .4 14 . 0 31 .4 18 . 6 18 . 6 ue : 3 5 1 3 3 1 3 6 3 1 4 1. .***************************************************************************** Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR 1999 Background Levels-of- Service Worksheets KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:36 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:36 199t7Background Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 199# Background Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III q SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT I Key: VOLUMES -- > -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- 20 30 10 WIDTHS -- .0 12.0 .0 v LANES N RT 2D .91 22 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 0 N-TH 30 .91 33 LT+TH+RT 66 1 1.00 66 .17 .33 \ 0 .0 0 N-LT 10 .91 11 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 / I \ /I\ -- 2005 24.0 2 E-RT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 2005 .91 2203 TH 2203 2 1.05 2313 .00 .00 0 .0 0 + / 0 .0 0 North E-LT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 1790 24.0 2 -- S-RT 30 .91 33 RT 33 1 1.00 33 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 120 .0 0 \ S-LT 80 .91 88 LT 88 2 1.03 91 1.00 .00 80 0 30 Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 24.0 .0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 120 .91 132 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 2 0 1 OVERLP N N N N W-TH 1790 .91 1967 TH+RT 2099 2 1.05 2204 .00 .06 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 0 .91 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 Appr Grade X Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPACCV1 11.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y V 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- V Y Y 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 N-LT+TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .855 .950 1.00 1513 E- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 Sq 31 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 I **/** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 * * * S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 * * * /1\ <* * *> <**** W- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .991 1.000 1.00 3690 v North <* +> +> ++++> I * + + ++++ * + + v G/C= .036 G/C= .057 G/C= .821 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 5.0" G= 8.0" G= 115.0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= 6.4% OFF=15.OX OFF= .0X OFF= .0X OFF= .0X C=140 sec G=128.0 sec = 91.4% Y=12.0 sec = 8.6% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S I _ COBKMAIM 1-2-98 5:18p Page 1 of 2 - _ St 4.. - - ,, _ Pap. 2 of 2 --- -1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:36 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:36 -10M-Background Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 1906 Background Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III rgg9 1719 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Intersection Averages: pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane Degree of Saturation (v/c) .73 Vehicle Delay 6.5 Level of Service 8+ ch Nvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- -- -- vph vphg -- - Sq 31 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1 N-LT+TH+RT 66 1513 .044 .064 97 .680 * **/** * * * E- TH 2313 3725 .621 .829 3087 .749 * * * * S- RT 33 1583 .021 .129 204 .162 v S- LT Pri. 91 3539 .026 .043 152 .599 * North <* +> +> ++++> W- TH+RT 2204 3690 .597 .829 3058 .721 1 * + + ++++ * + + v Cycle Length, C 140 sec Sun(v/s) _ .690 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .738 G/C= .036 G/C= .057 G/C= .821 G= 5.0" G= 8.0" G= 115.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet OFF= .0% OFF= 6.4% OFF=15.0%. Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan C=140 sec G=128.0 sec = 91.4% Y=12.0 sec = 8.6% Ped= .0 sec = .0% pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - I Lane 'Width/l g/C Service Rate Adj 1 I HCM I L 190% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used 'o IC (vph) oaE Volume v/c Delay S Queue N-LT+TH+RT .680 .064 48.7 1.00 97 16 11.49 60.2 F > 60.2 F E- TH .749 .829 4.1 1.00 3087 12 .56 4.7 A N Approach 60.2 F > 4.7 A S- RT .162 .129 41.3 1.00 204 16 .03 41.3 E+ ILT+TH+RT1 12/1 1 .330 1 .064 1 I 66 I 66 I .680 I 60.2 *F 1 122 ftl S- LT .599 .043 50.0 1.00 152 16 4.47 54.5 E > 51.0 E W- TH+RT .721 .829 3.9 1.00 3058 12 .45 4.3 A S Approach 51.0 E > 4.3 A Intl Total > 6.5 B+ 1 LT 1 24/2 1 .323 1 .043 1 1 1 109 1 91 1 .599 1 54.5 l*E+1 86 ftl Int Total .728 E Approach 4.7 A TH 1 24/2 1 .642 1 .829 I 3087 I 3087 1 2313 I .749 I 4.7 *A I 390 ftl W Approach 4.3 A I TH+RTI 24/2 I .624 1 .829 1 3058 I 3058 1 2204 I .721 1 4.3 I A 1 372 ft1 S i KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:15:22 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:15:22 1WP8 Background Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 14101 Background Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SU 72nd 19'9 Ill, SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.41 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr .Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT Key: VOLUMES -- > -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph 110 100 135 WIDTHS .0 12.0 12.0 v LANES N-RT 110 .97 113 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 1 N-TH 100 .97 103 TN+RT 216 1 1.00 216 .00 .52 / I \ \ 55 .0 0 /.\ N-LT 135 .97 139 LT 139 1 1.00 139 1.00 .00 -- 1835 24.0 2 I E-RT 55 .97 57 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 1835 .97 1892 TH+RT 1949 2 1.05 2046 .00 .03 130 12.0 1 / + / 160 24.0 2 North E-LT 160 .97 165 LT 165 2 1.03 170 1.00 .00 1605 24.0 2 -- S-RT 215 .97 222 RT 222 1 1.00 222 .00 1.00 \ 1 / S-TH 140 .97 144 TN 144 1 1.00 144 .00 .00 100 12.0 1 \ S-LT 125 .97 129 LT 129 1 1.00 129 1.00 .00 125 140 215 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 12.0 12.0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 100 .97 103 RT 103 1 1.00 103 .00 1.00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 1 OVERLP Y Y Y Y W-TH 1605 .97 1655 TH 1655 2 1.05 1738 .00 .00 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 130 .97 134 LT 134 1 1.00 134 1.00 .00 Appr Grade X Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 11.41 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - X RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TN LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 N- TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .922 1.000 1.00 1717 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .485 1.00 903 Sq 16 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 I Phase 4 i Phase 5 Phase 6 E- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3709 LD/LD E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 + + + - + + + **** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 /I\ <+ + +). <**** S- TH 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 1863 v **** 5- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .303 1.00 564 - ++++ y **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 * + + +I * + + + ++++ ++++ W- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 G/C= .200 G/C= .079 G/C= .014 G/C= .593 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 28.0" G= 11.0" G= 2.0" G= 83.0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF=22.9% OFF=33.6X OFF=37.9% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=140 sec G=124.0 sec = 88.6% Y=16.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S t _a COBK72 1-2-98 5:15p Page 1 of 3 COArT7 1_2_98_5s5p Page 2 ofd KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:15:22 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:15:22 1411/0 Background Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 11118 Background Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 1NCI 1111 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT-Factor Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Approach Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Input/Calculation N-LT E-LT S-LT W-LT pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s 9/C Capac v/c Grp C - Cycle Length 140.0000 .0000 140.0000 .0000 -- -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - G - Actual Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 g - Effective Green Time 29.0000 .0000 29.0000 .0000 N- TH+RT 216 1717 .126 .207 356 .607 go Opp. Effective Green Time 29.0000 .0000 29.0000 .0000 N- LT Pri. 139 903 .154 .207 187 .743 N - Number of Lanes 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 E- TH+RT 2046 3709 .552 .600 2225 .920 * VII - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 139.0000 .0000 129.0000 .0000 E- LT Pri. 170 3539 .048 .086 303 .561 PLT - Proportion of LT 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 S- RT 222 1583 .140 .314 498 .446 vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate 144.0000 .0000 216.0000 .0000 S- TH 144 1863 .077 .207 386 .373 tL - Lost Time 3.0000 .0000 3.0000 .0000 S- LT Pri. 129 564 .229 .207 117 1.103 * LTC - Left Turns per Cycle 5.4056 .0000 5.0167 .0000 W- RT 103 1583 .065 .643 1018 .101 Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 5.6000 .0000 8.4000 .0000 W- TH 1738 3725 .467 .643 2395 .726 Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 W- LT Pri. 134 1770 .076 .129 228 .588 * gf - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 qro - Opposing Queue Ratio .7929 .0000 .7929 .0000 Cycle Length, C 140 sec Sum(v/s) = .856 gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 6.6522 .0000 12.1364 .0000 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .915 gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green 22.3478 .0000 16.8636 .0000 fs - LT Satur. Factor (9-17) .7850 .0000 .7400 .0000 PL - Proportion of LT (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9-18) 3.3261 .0000 6.0682 .0000 PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan ELI - TH Equivalent for LT 1.5900 .0000 1.9200 .0000 pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS fmin - Minimum Value for fLT .1379 .0000 .1379 .0000 -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - fm - LT Factor for LT (9-17) .4847 .0000 .3029 .0000 fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group .4847 .0000 .3029 .0000 N- TH+RT .607 .207 38.3 1.00 356 16 2.12 40.4 E+ N- LT .743 .207 39.5 1.00 187 16 9.86 49.4 E+ > 43.9 E+ E- TH+RT .920 .600 19.0 1.00 2225 12 3.87 22.9 C E- LT .561 .086 46.7 1.00 303 12 1.34 48.1 E+ > 24.8 C S- RT .446 .314 29.1 1.00 498 16 .44 29.5 0+ S- TN .373 .207 36.2 1.00 386 16 .29 36.5 D S- LT 1.103 .207 42.2@ 1.00 117 16 74.96@ 117.1@ F > 54.4@ E W- RT .101 .643 7.3 1.00 1018 12 .00 7.3 B+ W- TH .726 .643 12.7 1.00 2395 12 .60 13.3 B W- LT .588 .129 43.7 1.00 228 12 2.15 45.8 E+ > 15.2 C+ Cycle=140" @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE) Int Total .765 > 25.3@ D+ S i KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:15:22 141108 Background Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd Ig9q SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .77 Vehicle Delay 25.32 Level of Service D+ expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE) Sq 16 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 LD/LD + + + /I\ <+ + +> - - <**** V #**# ++++ V **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> * + + + ++++ ++++ * + + + V V G/C= .200 G/C= .079 G/C= .014 G/C= .593 G= 28.0" G= 11.0" G= 2.0" G= 83.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=22.9% OFF=33.6% OFF=37.9% C=140 sec G=124.0 sec = 88.6% Y=16.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% lLane (Width/i g/C Service Rate Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used 2C (vph) 2E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 43.9 E+ TH+RT1 12/1 l .375 l .207 1 l 159 l 139 i .743 l 49.4 l E+ 217 ft) S Approach 54.401 E RT 12/1 LT 12/1 I .422 I .207 I 1 I 354 93 I 129 11.1 3 1 117.121*F+I 201 ft TH 12/1 .342 .207 1 E Approach 24.8 C.600 l LT+RTi 24/2 i .331 i .086 i 2101 2225 262 i 2046 70 l .561 i 48.1 l*E+l 805 153 ft W Approach 15.2 C+ ft RT TH 24/2 LT l 12/1 I .341 ( ,129 1 2311 1 2196 11 134 I .588 I 45.8 I*E+I 230 ft S CO8K72 1-2-98 5:15p Page 3 of 3 99BKCOM.IN Wed Jul 1, 1998 15:14:34 Page 3-1 99BKCOM.IN Wed Jul 1, 1998 15:14:34 Page 4-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER 1999 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #11 SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Access Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Cycle (sec): 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 2.043 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 634.2 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ( 11 II 11 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include I Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Control: Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign i I II Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: I II I Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 II 1 0 1 0 1 II 1 0 1 0 1 II 1 0 0 1 0 1 Base Vol: 90 430 0 295 45 30 60 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 93 443 0 304 46 31 62 0 Base Vol: 170 370 40 135 175 45 90 375 190 145 245 60 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 175 381 41 139 180 46 93 386 196 149 252 62 Initial Fut: 93 448 0 309 46 31 62 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 PasserByVol: 15 0 0 0 0 5 5 30 10 0 30 0 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Initial Fut: 190 381 41 139 180 51 98 416 206 149 282 62 PHF Volume: 102 492 0 0 339 51 34 0 68 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PNF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Final Vol.: 102 492 0 0 339 51 34 0 68 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 194 389 42 142 184 52 100 425 210 152 288 63 Adjusted Volume Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade: OX 0% 0% 0% Reduced Vol: 194 389 42 142 184 52 100 425 210 152 288 63 X Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 Final Vol.: 194 389 42 142 184 52 100 425 210 152 288 631 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: Adj Vol.: 103 492 0 0 339 51 34 0 69 0 0 0 Sat/Lane: 211 211 211 234 234 234 245 245 245 246 246 246 Critical Gap Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Lanes: 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.18 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1 211 190 21 234 234 234 245 245 245 246 202 44 Capacity Module: 11 11 II I Capacity Analysis Module: II II II Cnflict Vol: 390 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 959 xxxx 365 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.92 2.04 2.04 0.61 0.79 0.22 0.41 1.73 0.86 0.62 1.43 1.43 Potent Cap.: 1117 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 295 xxxx 905 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.87 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1117 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 257 xxxx 905 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: II II II I 1I II II 1 Delay/Veh: 32.9 2350 2350 10.0 19.8 2.3 4.7 729 26.0 10.5 226 226.3 Level Of Service Module: Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Stopped Del: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 16.2 xxxx 4.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx AdjDel/Veh: 32.9 2350 2350 10.0 19.8 2.3 4.7 729 26.0 10.5 226 226.3 LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * A * * * LOS by Move: E F F C C A A F D C F F Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 0.6 0.0 8.3 0.0 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S i 998KCOM.OUT 7-1-98 3:14p Page 2 of 2 MITIG8 Wed Jul 1, 1998 15 : 21 :40 Page 1-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR COMMUTER Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol ./Cap. (X) : 0 . 700 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 22 . 8 Optimal Cycle : 59 Level Of Service : C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II I I I I I Control : Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module : � + II II Base Vol : 170 370 40 135 175 45 90 375 190 145 245 60 Growth Adj : 1. 03 1 . 03 1 . 03 1. 03 1 . 03 1. 03 1. 03 1 . 03 1. 03 1 . 03 1 . 03 1. 03 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol : 15 0 0 0 0 5 5 30 10 0 30 0 " `ial Fut : 190 381 41 139 180 51 98 416 206 149 282 62 Adj : 1. 00 1.00 1 . 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Phi' Adj : 0. 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 .98 0.98 0 .98 0 .98 0. 98 0 . 98 0 .98 0. 98 PHF Volume: 194 389 42 142 184 52 100 425 210 152 288 63 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol : 194 389 42 142 184 52 100 425 210 152 288 63 PCE Adj : 1 . 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1 .00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 MLF Adj : 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Final Vol. : 194 389 42 142 184 52 100 425 210 152 288 63 I I I II I I 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0 . 95 0 .99 0 .99 0 . 95 1 .00 0 . 85 0 . 95 1 . 00 0 . 85 0 . 95 0 . 97 0 . 97 Lanes : 1. 00 0 . 90 0 .10 1. 00 1 .00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 0 . 82 0 . 18 Final Sat . : 1805 1698 183 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 1512 331 I II II II 1 Capacity Analysis Module : Vol/Sat : 0 . 11 0 .23 . 0 .23 0 . 08 0 .10 0 . 03 0 . 06 0 .22 0. 13 0 . 08 0 .19 0 . 19 Crit Moves : **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0 .23 0 .33 0 .33 0 . 11 0 .21 0 . 21 0 . 10 0 .32 0 . 32 0 . 12 0 .34 0 . 34 Volume/Cap: 0.46 0 . 70 0 . 70 0. 70 0 .46 0. 15 0 . 56 0 . 70 0.41 0 . 70 0 . 56 0 . 56 Level Of Se,ice Module: II II II 1 Delay/Veh: 22 .0 21.4 21 .4 34 .5 23 . 0 20 . 9 30 .6 21.7 17 . 5 33 .7 18 .2 18 . 2 User DelAdj : 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 4Del/Veh: 22 .0 21.4 21 .4 34 .5 23 . 0 20 . 9 30 .6 21 . 7. 17 . 5 33 . 7 18 .2 18 .2 ue: 5 10 1 4 5 1 3 11 5 5 7 2 . ..*****************************************************************************f Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:19:31 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:19:31 1018 Background Theater Peak - HWY 99/ACT III i Background Theater Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 199q ly4q SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4) - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4) - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT I Key: VOLUMES -- >WIDTHS -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- 35 60 10 .0 12.0 .0 v LANES N-RT 35 .91 38 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 0 N-TH 60 .91 66 LT+TH+RT 115 1 1.00 115 .10 .33 \ 0 .0 0 N-LT 10 .91 11 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 / \ /I\ --1475 24.0 2 E-RT 0 .91 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 1475 .91 1621 TN 1621 2 1.05 1702 .00 .00 0 .0 0 / + / 0 .0 0 North E-LT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 1365 24.0 2 -- S-RT 50 .91 55 RT 55 1 1.00 55 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 185 .0 0 \ S-LT 125 .91 137 LT 137 2 1.03 141 1.00 .00 125 0 50 Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 24.0 .0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 185 .91 203 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 2 0 1 OVERLP N N N N W-TH 1365 .91 1500 TH+RT 1703 2 1.05 1788 .00 .12 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 0 .91 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 Appr Grade X Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - X RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Ins Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y V 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y V 4 4 4 N-LT+TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .855 .950 1.00 1514 E- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 sq 31 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 **/** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 * * * S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 * * * /I\ <* * *> <**** W- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .982 1.000 1.00 3659 v North <* +> +> ++++> I * + + ++++ * + + v G/C= .057 G/C= .107 G/C= .750 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 8.0" G= 15.0" G= 105.0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= 8.6% OFF=22.1% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=140 sec G=128.0 sec = 91.4% Y=12.0 sec = 8.6% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S S THBKMAIN 1-2-98 5:19p Page 1 of 2 PAge 7 of 2 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:19:31 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:19:31 1 Background Theater Peak - HWY 99/ACT III WEB Background Theater Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 1°I°14 Wig SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Intersection Averages: pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane Degree of Saturation (v/c) .62 Vehicle Delay 9.7 Level of Service 8+ ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vphg Sq 31 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 N-LT+TH+RT 115 1514 .076 .114 173 .665 * **/** * * * E- TH 1702 3725 .457 .757 2821 .603 * * * • S- RT 55 1583 .035 .200 317 .174 v S- LT Pri. 141 3539 .040 .064 228 .618 * North <* +> +> ++++> W- TH+RT 1788 3659 .489 .757 2770 .645 * 1 * + + ++++ * + + y Cycle Length, C 140 sec Sum(v/s) = .604 Lost Time Per Cycle, 1. 9.0 sec Xc = .646 G/C= .057 G/C= .107 G/C= .750 G= 8.0" G= 15.0" G= 105.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet OFF= .0% OFF= 8.6% OFF=22.1% Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay lane Cal Incr Lane Lan C=140 sec . G=128.0 sec = 91.4% Y=12.0 sec = 8.6% Ped= .0 sec = .0% pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - I Lane (Width/I g/C Service RateAdj I HCM l L 190% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used lC (vph) E 'Volume' v/c Delay S Queue N-LT+TH+RT .665 .114 45.2 1.00 173 16 6.25 51.4 E > 51.4 E E- TH .603 .757 5.8 1.00 2821 12 .20 6.0 B+ N Approach 51.4 E > 6.0 8+ S- RT .174 .200 35.3 1.00 317 16 .03 35.3 D (LT+TH+RT1 12/1 1 .342 1 .114 1 1 137 1 115 1 .665 ( 51.4 *E 1 200 ftl S- LT .618 .064 48.5 1.00 228 16 3.52 52.0 E > 47.3 E+ W- TH+RT .645 .757 6.1 1.00 2770 12 .28 6.4 8+ S Approach 47.3 E+ > 6.4 8+ __ IntlTotal .619 =--> 9.7 8+ I LT 1 24/2 I .328 I .064 I 1 I 179 � 141 I .618 ' 52.0 l*E 1 130 ftl E Approach 6.0 8+ TH 1 24/2 1 .522 1 .757 1 2821 1 2821 1 1702 1 .603 1 6.0 1*8+1 407 ftl W Approach 6.4 8+ TH+RT1 24/2 1 .544 1 .757 1 2770 1 2770 1 1788 1 .645 I 6.4 1 8+1 427 ft1 S 6 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT Ili TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:20 ACT• III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:20 UMWrBackground Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 141116 Background Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd Mg 1949 SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 11.4] - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 L1.47 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT Key: VOLUMES -- > vph -- vph -- vph - vph 120 60 105 I WIDTHS - .0 12.0 12.0 v LANES N-RT 120 .90 133 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 1 N-TN 60 .90 67 TH+RT 200 1 1.00 200 .00 .67 \ 50 .0 0 N-LT 105 .90 117 LT 117 1 1.00 117 1.00 .00 / /I\ -- 1385 24.0 2 E-RT 50 .90 56 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 1385 .90 1539 TH+RT 1595 2 1.05 1675 .00 .04 100 12.0 1 / + / 95 24.0 2 North E-LT 95 .90 106 LT 106 2 1.03 109 1.00 .00 1240 24.0 2 -- I S-RT 195 .90 217 RT 217 1 1.00 217 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 65 .90 72 TH 72 1 1.00 72 .00 .00 90 12.0 1 \ S-LT 75 .90 83 LT 83 1 1.00 83 1.00 .00 75 65 195 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 12.0 12.0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 90 .90 100 RT 100 1 1.00 100 .00 1.00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 1 OVERLP Y Y Y Y W TN 1240 .90 1378 TH 1378 2 1.05 1447 .00 .00 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 100 .90 111 LT 111 1 1.00 111 1.00 .00 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAl94/TEAPACIV1 11.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - X RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TN LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y V 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Ins Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y V 4 4 4 N- TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .900 1.000 1.00 1677 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .703 1.00 1310 Sq 16 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 I E- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .995 1.000 1.00 3706 LD/LD E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 + + + **** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 /j\ <+ + +> <**** S- TH 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 1863 -+I **** S- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .317 1.00 591 - ++++ v **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 I * + + + ++++ ++++ W- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 * + + + V v W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 G/C= .182 G/C= .081 G/C= .027 G/C= .601 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 27.0" G= 12.0" G= 4.0" G= 89.0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF=20.9% OFF=31.8% OFF=37.2% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=148 sec G=132.0 sec = 89.2% Y=16.0 sec = 10.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S 0 THBK72 1-2-98 5:17p Page 1 of 3 TA81C2 1-2-98 5:17p Pay. 7 of 3 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:20 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:20 Background Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 1011 Background Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 1g41 (99q SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Supplemental LT-Factor Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPACEV1 11.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Approach Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Input/Calculation N-LT E-LT S-LT W-LT pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp C - Cycle Length 148.0000 .0000 148.0000 .0000 -- -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - G - Actual Green Time 27.0000 .0000 27.0000 .0000 = g - Effective Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 N- TH+RT 200 1677 .119 .189 317 .631 go - Opp. Effective Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 N- LT Pri. 117 1310 .089 .189 248 .472 N - Number of Lanes 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 E- TH+RT 1675 3706 .452 .608 2254 .743 * vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 117.0000 .0000 83.0000 .0000 E- LT Pri. 109 3539 .031 .088 311 .350 PLT - Proportion of LT 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 S- RT 217 1583 .137 .297 471 .461 vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate 72.0000 .0000 200.0000 .0000 S- TH 72 1863 .039 .189 352 .205 tL - Lost Time 3.0000 .0000 3.0000 .0000 S- LT Pri. 83 591 .140 .189 112 .741 * LTC - Left Turns per Cycle 4.8100 .0000 3.4122 .0000 W- RT 100 1583 .063 .662 1048 .095 Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 2.9600 .0000 8.2222 .0000 W- TH 1447 3725 .388 .662 2467 .587 Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 W- LT Pri. 111 1770 .063 .142 251 .442 * gf - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 qro - Opposing Queue Ratio .8108 .0000 .8108 .0000 Cycle Length, C 148 sec Sum(v/s) = .655 gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 2.0000 .0000 12.0000 .0000 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .697 gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green 26.0000 .0000 16.0000 .0000 fs - LT Satur. Factor (9-17) .8300 .0000 .7500 .0000 PL - Proportion of LT (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 6.0000 .0000 PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal lncr Lane Lan ELI - TH Equivalent for LT 1.3200 .0000 1.8000 .0000 pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS fmin - Minimum Value for fLT .1429 .0000 .1429 .0000 -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - fm - LT Factor for LT (9-17) .7035 .0000 .3175 .0000 fLT - LT Factor for lane Group .7035 .0000 .3175 .0000 N- TH+RT .631 .189 42.0 1.00 317 16 2.81 44.8 E+ N- LT .472 .189 40.6 1.00 248 16 1.08 41.7 E+ > 43.6 E+ E- TH+RT .743 .608 15.8 1.00 2254 12 .72 16.5 C+ E- LT .350 .088 48.3 1.00 311 12 .22 48.5 E+ > 18.4 C+ S- RT .461 .297 32.2 1.00 471 16 .53 32.7 0 S- TH .205 .189 38.5 1.00 352 16 .04 38.5 D S- LT .741 .189 43.0 1.00 112 16 14.91 57.9 E > 39.5 D W- RT .095 .662 6.9 1.00 1048 12 .00 6.9 B+ W- TH .587 .662 10.5 1.00 2467 12 .20 10.7 B W- LT .442 .142 44.2 1.00 251 12 .63 44.8 E+ > 12.8 B Cycle=148" Int Total .617 > 20.0 C+ S a • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:20 1lL18 Background Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd ligi SIGNAL94/TEAPACCV1 11.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .62 Vehicle Delay 20.0 Level of Service C+ Sq 16 Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 LD/LD - + + + � + + + **** / \ <+ + +> <**** V - **** - ++++ V **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> * + + + ++++ ++++ * + + + v v G/C= .182 G/C= .081 G/C= .027 G/C= .601 G= 27.0" G= 12.0" G= 4.0" G= 89.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=20.9% OFF=31.8% OFF=37.2X C=148 sec G=132.0 sec = 89.2% Y=16.0 sec = 10.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group I Lanes' Reqd Used QC (vph) QE !Volume' v/c I Delay I S I Queue N Approach 43.6 E+ ILT+RTI 12/1 I .364 I .189 1 I 211 I 117 I .472 I 41.7 I E+I 197 ftI S Approach 39.5 D RT 12/1 LT 12/1 I .387 I .189 I 1 I 312 86 I 217 83 I .741 I 57.9 I*E 1 140 ft E Approach 18.4 C+ ITH+RT 24/2 I .344 I .088 1 2111 1 2260 1 1109 I .350 I 48.5 I*E+I 103 fti W Approach 12.8 B RT LT 1 12/1 I .355 I _142 1 2381 1 2214 1 1111 I .442 I 44.8 I*E+I 198 ft S r TH8K72 1-2-98 5:17p Page 3 of 3 998KGEN.IN Wed Jul 1, 1998 15:15:05 Page 3-1 99BKGEN.IN Wed Jul 1, 1998 15:15:05 Page 4-1 KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR OF THEATER 1999 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR OF THEATER Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Access Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Cycle (sec): 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.247 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 60.9 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F Movement: L - T - R L • T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Control: I Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign I I II II II I Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Base Vol: 90 250 185 45 75 80 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 Volume Module: II II II Initial Bse: 93 258 191 46 77 82 0 Base Vol: 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 113 206 26 103 129 41 88 268 118 36 160 57 Initial Fut: 93 263 196 46 77 82 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 PasserByVol: 15 0 0 0 0 5 5 30 10 0 30 0 PHF Adj: 0.79 0.79 0.7 0.7 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.7 0.79 0.79 0.7 0.7 Initial Fut: 128 206 26 103 129 46 93 298 128 36 190 57 PHF Volume: 117 332 248 59 98 104 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Final Vol.: 117 332 248 59 98 104 0 PHF Volume: 146 234 29 117 146 53 105 338 146 41 216 64 Adjusted Volume Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade: OX 0% 0 0 Reduced Vol: 146 234 29 117 146 53 105 338 146 41 216 64 % Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 Final Vol.: 146 234 29 117 146 53 105 338 146 41 216 641 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Saturation Flow Module: Adj Vol.: 119 332 0 0 248 59 99 0 105 0 0 0 Sat/Lane: 219 219 219 240 240 240 271 271 271 228 228 228 Critical Gap Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx lanes: 1.00 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.23 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 219 195 24 240 240 240 271 271 271 228 176 52 I II II II I II II II I Capacity Module: Capacity Analysis Module: Cnflict Vol: 306 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 726 xxxx 277 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol/Sat: 0.67 1.20 1.20 0.49 0.61 0.22 0.39 1.25 0.54 0.18 1.23 1.23 Potent Cap.: 1225 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 402 xxxx 1002 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.88 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1225 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 354 xxxx 1002 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: II II II I II II II I Delay/Veh: 12.6 95.9 95.9 6.4 10.1 2.3 4.4 114 7.7 2.0 106 106.3 Level Of Service Module: Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Stopped Del: 3.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 14.1 xxxx 4.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx AdjDel/Veh: 12.6 95.9 95.9 6.4 10.1 2.3 4.4 114 7.7 2.0 106 106.3 LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * A * * * LOS by Move: C F F B C A A F B A F F Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpOel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 0.9 0.0 8.9 0.0 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S 99BKGEN.OUT 7-1-98 3:15p 4 Page 2 of 2 MITIG8 Wed Jul 1, 1998 15 :22 : 09 Page 1-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR OF THEATER Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol . /Cap. (X) : 0 .473 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 19 . 4 Optimal Cycle : 39 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control : Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights : Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 Growth Adj : 1. 03 1. 03 1. 03 1 . 03 1. 03 1 . 03 1 . 03 1 . 03 1 . 03 1 .03 1 . 03 1. 03 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol : 15 0 0 0 0 5 5 30 10 0 30 0 `ial Fut : 128 206 26 103 129 46 93 298 128 36 190 57 Adj : 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1 . 00 Pnr' Adj : 0. 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 .88 0 . 88 0 .88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 PHF Volume: 146 234 29 117 146 53 105 338 146 41 216 64 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 146 234 29 117 146 53 105 338 146 41 216 64 PCE Adj : 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 Final Vol. : 146 234 29 117 146 53 105 338 146 41 216 64 I II II II Saturation Flow Module : Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment : 0 . 95 0 . 98 0 . 98 0 . 95 1. 00 0 .85 0 . 95 1 . 00 0 .85 0 .95 0 . 97 0 .97 Lanes : 1. 00 0 . 89 0 . 11 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 0 .77 0 .23 Final Sat. : 1805 1657 205 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 1422 421 I II I I I I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat : 0. 08 0 .14 0 . 14 0 . 06 0 . 08 0 .03 0 . 06 0 . 18 0 . 09 0 . 02 0 .15 0 . 15 Crit Moves : **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle : 0. 22 0 .30 0 .30 0 . 14 0 .21 0 .21 0 .12 0 .39 0 .39 0 . 05 0 .32 0 .32 Volume/Cap: 0. 36 0 .47 0 .47 0 .47 0 .36 0 .15 0 .47 0 .45 0 .23 0 .45 0 .47 0 .47 I II II II Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 21 .4 19 . 0 19 . 0 26 . 8 22 . 0 20 . 7 27 . 6 14 .7 13 . 1 32 . 2 18 . 0 18 . 0 User DelAdj : 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 -4Del/Veh: 21 .4 19 . 0 19 . 0 26 .8 22 . 0 20 . 7 27 . 6 14 . 7 13 . 1 32 . 2 18 . 0 18 . 0 ue : 3 5 1 3 3 1 3 7 3 1 5 2 .. ..*************************.**************************************************** Traffix 6 . 8 .1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR 1999 Total Traffic Levels-of- Service Worksheets ■ KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:54 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:54 11913 Total Traffic Computer Peak - HWY 99/ACT III wig Total Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 1119 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT 20 30 10 I Key: VOLUMES -- > -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph WIDTHS .0 12.0 .0 v LANES N-RT 20 .91 22 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 0 N-TH 30 .91 33 LT+TH+RT 66 1 1.00 66 .17 .33 \ 0 .0 0 N-LT 10 .91 11 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 / I \ /1\ -- 2005 24.0 2 E-RT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 2005 .91 2203 TH 2203 2 1.05 2313 .00 .00 0 .0 0 / + / 0 .0 0 North E-LT 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 1790 24.0 2 -- S-RT 30 .91 33 RT 33 1 1.00 33 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 0 .91 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 130 .0 0 \ S-LT 90 .91 99 LT 99 2 1.03 102 1.00 .00 90 0 30 Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 24.0 .0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 130 .91 143 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 2 0 1 OVERLP N N N N W-TH 1790 .91 1967 TH+RT 2110 2 1.05 2215 .00 .07 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 0 .91 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 Appr Grade X Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .91 .91 .91 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 N-LT+TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .855 .950 1.00 1513 E- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 Sq 31 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 **/** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 * * * S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 * * * /.\ <* * *> <**** W- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 3688 v North <* +> +> ++++> I * + + ++++ * + + v G/C= .036 G/C= .057 G/C= .821 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 5.0" G= 8.0" G= 115.0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= 6.4% OFF=I5.OX OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=140 sec G=128.0 sec = 91.4% Y=12.0 sec = 8.6% Ped= .0 sec = .0X S COTOMAIM 1-2-98 5:18p Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:54 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:18:55 116B Total Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 1901.6 Total Traffic Commuter Peak - HWY 99/ACT III 1'(99 IT ' SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Intersection Averages: pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane Degree of Saturation (v/c) .73 Vehicle Delay 6.7 Level of Service B+ ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- -- -- vph vphg -- Sq 31 Phase 1 I Phase 2 Phase 3 * N-LT+TH+RT 66 1513 .044 .064 97 .680 / * * * E- TH 2313 3725 .621 .829 3087 .749 * * * * S- RT 33 1583 .021 .129 204 .162 v S- LT Pri. 102 3539 .029 .043 152 .671 * North <* +> +> ++++> W- TH+RT 2215 3688 .601 .829 3055 .725 I * + + ++++ * + + V Cycle Length, C 140 sec Sun(v/s) _ .693 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .741 G/C= .036 G/C= .057 G/C= .821 G= 5.0" Or 8.0" Or 115.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.41 - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet OFF= .0% OFF= 6.4% OFF=15.0X Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan C=140 sec G=128.0 sec = 91.4% Y=12.0 sec = 8.67. Ped= .0 sec = .0% pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - I Lane (Width/I g/C Service Rate' Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used aC (vph) a Volume v/c Delay S Queue N-LT+TH+RT .680 .064 48.7 1.00 97 16 11.49 60.2 F > 60.2 F E- TH .749 .829 4.1 1.00 3087 12 .56 4.7 A N Approach 60.2 F > 4.7 A S- RT .162 .129 41.3 1.00 204 16 .03 41.3 E+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 I .330 I .064 1 I 66 I 66 I .680 I 60.2 *F I 122 ft, S- LT .671 .043 50.2 1.00 152 16 7.32 57.5 E > 53.5 E W- TH+RT .725 .829 3.9 1.00 3055 12 .47 4.4 A S Approach 53.5 E > 4.4 A Cycle=140" I RT 1 12/1 I .322 I .129 I 1 I 167 I 33 I .162 I 41.3 I E+I 57 ftl Int Total .731 > 6.7 8+ LT 24/2 .324 .043 1 109 102 .671 57.5 *E 96 ft E Approach 4.7 A TH I 24/2 I .642 I .829 I 3087 I 3087 I 2313 I .749 I 4.7 *A I 390 ftl W Approach 4.4 A TH+RTI 24/2 I .627 I .829 1 3055 I 3055 I 2215 I .725 I 4.4 I A 1 374 ftl 1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:15:51 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:15:51 11ew Total Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 111118 Total Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd fc q 1999 SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 11.4] - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 11.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT 110 100 135 I Key: VOLUMES -- > -- vph -- vph -- vph - - vph WIDTHS .0 12.0 12.0 v LANES N-RT 110 .97 113 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 1 N-TH 100 .97 103 TH+RT 216 1 1.00 216 .00 .52 \ 55 .0 0 N-LT 135 .97 139 LT 139 1 1.00 139 1.00 .00 / I \ /I\ -- 1835 24.0 2 E-RT 55 .97 57 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 1835 .97 1892 TH+RT 1949 2 1.05 2046 .00 .03 130 12.0 1 / + / 170 24.0 2 North E-LT 170 .97 175 LT 175 2 1.03 180 1.00 .00 1605 24.0 2 -- S-RT 220 .97 227 RT 227 1 1.00 227 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 140 .97 144 TH 144 1 1.00 144 .00 .00 100 12.0 1 \ S-LT 125 .97 129 LT 129 1 1.00 129 1.00 .00 125 140 220 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 12.0 12.0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 100 .97 103 RT 103 1 1.00 103 .00 1.00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 1 OVERLP Y Y Y Y W-TH 1605 .97 1655 TH 1655 2 1.05 1738 .00 .00 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 130 .97 134 LT 134 1 1.00 134 1.00 .00 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.41 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - % RT TN LT Loc Nm Nb RT TN LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of Sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .97 .97 .97 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 N- TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .922 1.000 1.00 1717 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .485 1.00 903 Sq 16 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 I E- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3709 LD/LD E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 + + + + + + **** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 /1\ <+ + +> - - v <****/ 5- TH 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 1863 **** S- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .303 1.00 564 ++++ v **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 I * + + + ++++ ++++ W- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 * + + + v v W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 G/C= .200 G/C= .079 G/C= .014 G/C= .593 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 28.0" G= 11.0" G= 2.0" G= 83.0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF=22.9% OFF=33.6% OFF=37.9% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=140 sec G=124.0 sec = 88.6% Y=16.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S COT072 1-2-98 5:15p Page 1 of 3 1 K IN 8 IATf 2/9U KIT 8 A - TES, - •' nv07i98 As.' ILI TIGnnv OWAN,....,. ..5:5 AC1 1GAI NSI' 52 141108 Total Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd 1_ Total Commuter Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 7ena 1199 Igo SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4I - HCM Supplemental LT-Factor Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPACCV1 11.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Approach Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Input/Calculation N-LT E-LT S-LT W-LT pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp C - Cycle Length 140.0000 .0000 140.0000 .0000 -- -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - G - Actual Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 _ g - Effective Green Time 29.0000 .0000 29.0000 .0000 N- TH+RT 216 1717 .126 .207 356 .607 go Opp. Effective Green Time 29.0000 .0000 29.0000 .0000 N- LT Pri. 139 903 .154 .207 187 .743 N - Number of Lanes 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 E- • H+RT 2046 3709 .552 .600 2225 .920 * vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 139.0000 .0000 129.0000 .0000 E- LT Pri. 180 3539 .051 .086 303 .594 PLT - Proportion of LT 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 S- RT 227 1583 .143 .314 498 .456 vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate 144.0000 .0000 216.0000 .0000 S- TH 144 1863 .077 .207 386 .373 tL - Lost Time 3.0000 .0000 3.0000 .0000 S- LT Pri. 129 564 .229 .207 117 1.103 * LTC - Left Turns per Cycle 5.4056 .0000 5.0167 .0000 W- RT 103 1583 .065 .643 1018 .101 Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 5.6000 .0000 8.4000 .0000 W- TH 1738 3725 .467 .643 2395 .726 Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 W- LT Pri. 134 1770 .076 .129 228 .588 * gf - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 qro - Opposing Queue Ratio .7929 .0000 .7929 .0000 Cycle Length, C 140 sec Sum(v/s) _ .856 gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 6.6522 .0000 12.1364 .0000 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .915 gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green 22.3478 .0000 16.8636 .0000 fs - LT Satur. Factor (9-17) .7850 .0000 .7400 .0000 PL - Proportion of LT (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9-18) 3.3261 .0000 6.0682 .0000 PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan ELI - TH Equivalent for LT 1.5900 .0000 1.9200 .0000 pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 OF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS fmin - Minimum Value for fLT .1379 .0000 .1379 .0000 -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - ___ fm - LT Factor for LT (9-17) .4847 .0000 .3029 .0000 fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group .4847 .0000 .3029 .0000 N- TH+RT .607 .207 38.3 1.00 356 16 2.12 40.4 E+ N- LT .743 .207 39.5 1.00 187 16 9.86 49.4 E+ > 43.9 E+ E- TH+RT .920 .600 19.0 1.00 2225 12 3.87 22.9 C E- LT .594 .086 46.9 1.00 303 12 1.71 48.6 E+ > 24.9 C S- RT .456 .314 29.2 1.00 498 16 .48 29.7 D+ S- TH .373 .207 36.2 1.00 386 16 .29 36.5 D S- LT 1.103 .207 42.2@ 1.00 117 16 74.961 117.11 F > 54.2@ E W- RT .101 .643 7.3 1.00 1018 12 .00 7.3 8+ W- TH .726 .643 12.7 1.00 2395 12 .60 13.3 B W- LT .588 .129 43.7 1.00 228 12 2.15 45.8 E+ > 15.2 C+ Cycle=140" 8 expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE) Int Total .766 > 25.4@ D+ S i y I f o S 99COM.OUT 7-1-98 3:15p Page 3 of 4 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:47 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:47 1I Total Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd MI5 Total Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd Mil 1148 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT Key: VOLUMES -- > I WIDTHS -- vph -- vph -- vph -- vph 120 60 105 .0 12.0 12.0 v LANES N-RT 120 .90 133 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 1 1 N-TH 60 .90 67 TH+RT 200 1 1.00 200 .00 .67 / I \ \ 50 .0 0 /.\ N-LT 105 .90 117 LT 117 1 1.00 117 1.00 .00 -- 1385 24.0 2 E-RT 50 .90 56 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 1385 .90 1539 TH+RT 1595 2 1.05 1675 .00 .04 100 12.0 1 / + / 110 24.0 2 North E-LT 110 .90 122 LT 122 2 1.03 126 1.00 .00 1240 24.0 2 -- S-RT 205 .90 228 RT 228 1 1.00 228 .00 1.00 \ I / S-TH 65 .90 72 TN 72 1 1.00 72 .00 .00 90 12.0 1 \ S-LT 80 .90 89 LT 89 1 1.00 89 1.00 .00 80 65 205 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 12.0 12.0 12.0 PERMSV N N N N W-RT 90 .90 100 RT 100 1 1.00 100 .00 1.00 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1 1 1 OVERLP Y Y Y Y W-TH 1240 .90 1378 TH 1378 2 1.05 1447 .00 .00 LEADLAG LD LD W-LT 100 .90 111 LT 111 1 1.00 111 1.00 .00 Appr Grade X Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 11.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet - X RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TN LT RT TN LT Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Ad' N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 pr Group Ideal of sat- E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 4 4 4 N- TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .900 1.000 1.00 1677 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .703 1.00 1310 Sq 16 I Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 Phase 6 I E- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .995 1.000 1.00 3706 LD/LD E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 + + + + + + **** S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 / \ <+ + +> _ <**** S- TH 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 1863 V ***' S- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .317 1.00 591 - ++++ v **** North <* + +> +> ++++> ++++> W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 * + + + ++++ ++++ W- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 * + + + V v W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 G/C= .182 G/C= .081 G/C= .027 G/C= .601 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= 27.0" G= 12.0" G= 4.0" G= 89.0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF=20.9X OFF=31.8X OFF=37.2X OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C=148 sec G=132.0 sec = 89.2% Y=16.0 sec = 10.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S c 4 THTO72 1-2-98 5:17p Page 1 of 3 THTO72 1-2-98 5_17p P ge 2.Qf 3 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:47 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:47 ISMS Total Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/Sw 72nd 141116 Total Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd rai l99 4 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4) - HCM Supplemental LT-Factor Worksheet SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Approach Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit Input/Calculation N-LT E-LT S-LT U-L7 pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane C Cycle Length 148.0000 .0000 148.0000 .0000 ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp G - Actual Green Time 27.0000 .0000 27.0000 .0000 vphg vph g - Effective Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 N- TH+RT 200 1677 .119 .189 317 .631 go - Opp. Effective Green Time 28.0000 .0000 28.0000 .0000 N- LT Pri. 117 1310 .089 .189 248 .472 N - Number of Lanes 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 E- TH+RT 1675 3706 .452 .608 2254 .743 * vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 117.0000 .0000 89.0000 .0000 E- LT Pri. 126 3539 .036 .088 311 .405 PLT - Proportion of LT 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 PLTo - Prop, of Opp. LT (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 S- RT 228 1583 .144 .297 471 .484 vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate 72.0000 .0000 200.0000 .0000 S- TH 72 1863 .039 .189 352 .205 tL - Lost Time 3.0000 .0000 3.0000 .0000 S- LT Pri. 89 591 .151 .189 112 .795 * LTC - Left Turns per Cycle 4.8100 .0000 3.6589 .0000 U- RT 100 1583 .063 .662 1048 .095 Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 2.9600 .0000 8.2222 .0000 U- TH 1447 3725 .388 .662 2467 .587 Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 U- LT Pri. 111 1770 .063 .142 251 .442 * gf - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 qro - Opposing Queue Ratio .8108 .0000 .8108 .0000 Cycle Length, C 148 sec Sum(v/s) _ .665 gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 2.0000 .0000 12.0000 .0000 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .708 gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green 26.0000 .0000 16.0000 .0000 fs - LT Satur. Factor (9-17) .8300 .0000 .7500 .0000 PL - Proportion of LT (9-17) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - NCH Level-of-Service Worksheet n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 6.0000 .0000 PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9-18) 1.0000 .0000 1.0000 .0000 Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal lncr Lane Lan EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT 1.3200 .0000 1.8000 .0000 pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9-18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS fmin - Minimum Value for fLT .1429 .0000 .1429 .0000 -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - fm - LT Factor for LT (9-17) .7035 .0000 .3175 .0000 fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group .7035 .0000 .3175 .0000 N- TH+RT .631 .189 42.0 1.00 317 16 2.81 44.8 E+ N- LT .472 .189 40.6 1.00 248 16 1.08 41.7 E+ > 43.6 E+ E- TH+RT .743 .608 15.8 1.00 2254 12 .72 16.5 C+ E- LT .405 .088 48.5 1.00 311 12 .37 48.9 E+ > 18.8 C+ S- RT .484 .297 32.4 1.00 471 16 .64 33.1 D S- TH .205 .189 38.5 1.00 352 16 .04 38.5 D S- LT .795 .189 43.5 1.00 112 16 20.67 64.2 F > 41.2 E+ U- RT .095 .662 6.9 1.00 1048 12 .00 6.9 B+ W- TN .587 .662 10.5 1.00 2467 12 .20 10.7 B W- LT .442 .142 44.2 1.00 251 12 .63 44.8 E+ > 12.8 8 Cycle=148" Int Total .620 > 20.4 C S • KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 01/02/98 ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 17:17:47 'NM Total Theater Peak Hour - HWY99/SW 72nd I`1g9 SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 L1.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .62 Vehicle Delay 20.4 Level of Service C LSq I Phase 1 I Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 + + + **** /I\ <+ + +> <**** V **** ++++ y **** North <* + +> +> +++a> ++++> * + + + ++++ ++++ * + + + y y G/C= .182 G/C= .081 G/C= .027 G/C= .601 G= 27.0" G= 12.0" G= 4.0" G= 89.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=20.9% OFF=31.8% OFF=37.2% C=148 sec G=132.0 sec = 89.2% Y=16.0 sec = 10.8% Ped= .0 sec = .0% LGroup IuLanes' Regdg/CUsed atel v/c I Delay ( S 190%0ueueXi N Approach 43.6 E+ ILT+RTI 12/1 I .364 I .189 1 I 211 I 117 I .472 I 41.7 I E+ 197 ftI S Approach 41.2 E+38.5 D 121 ft RT LT 1 12/1 I .392 I .189 1 I 312 86 228 89 I .795 I 64.2 I*F 150 ft E Approach 18.8 C+ LT+RTI 24/2 I .345 I .088 2115 1 2260 116 126 I .405 I 48.9 I*E+I 683 0 ft W Approach I 12.8 B LT 12/1 I .355 I .662 1 2381 1 2214 1 1111 I .442 I 44.8 ,*E+, 198 ft ( S F THT072 1-2-98 5:17p Page 3 of 3 99GEN.IN Wed Jul 1, 1998 15:16:05 Page 7-1 99GEN.IN Wed Jul 1, 1998 15:16:05 Page 8-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR GENERATOR 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR GENERATOR Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #10 72nd Avenue/ACT III North Access Intersection #11 SW 72nd Avenue/ACT III Main Access Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: i North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Modul(: II I I I I ( Volume Module: I I I I I I I Base Vol: 1 325 230 1 1 1 Base Vol: 90 250 185 45 75 80 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 1 335 237 1 1 1 Initial Bse: 93 258 191 46 77 82 Added Vol: 0 11 14 1 1 0 Added Vol: 16 0 0 14 11 12 PasserByVol: 0 5 5 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 5 5 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 350 255 2 2 1 Initial Fut: 108 263 196 60 88 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.79 0.79 0.7 0.7 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.7 0.79 0.7 0.7 0.7 PHF Volume: 1 350 255 2 2 1 PHF Volume: 137 332 248 76 111 120 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 350 255 2 2 1 Final Vol.: 137 332 248 76 111 120 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: OX OX 0 0 Grade: OX 0% 0. 0' X Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx X Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98 xxxx xxxx X Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx X Truck/Comb: 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Cycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 1 350 0 0 255 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 139 332 0 0 248 76 112 0 121 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II H I I II II II I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnftict Vol: 257 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 608 xxxx 256 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 323 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 755 xxxx 285 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1293 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 471 xxxx 1027 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1202 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 387 xxxx 992 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.88 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1293 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 471 xxxx 1027 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1202 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 342 xxxx 992 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: II 11 II 1 Level Of Service Module: II II II I Stopped Del: 2.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx 3.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 3.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.5 xxxx 4.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: A * * * * * C * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 595 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 6.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpOel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * * * Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.0 ApproachDel: 1.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S i 99GEN.OUT 7-1-98 3:16p Page 4 of 5 99GEN.IN Wed Jul 1, 1998 15:16:05 Page 9-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR GENERATOR Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 11CM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St Cycle (sec): 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.257 Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): 66.1 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 7 - R L - T - R 1 - 1 - R L - T - R Control: I Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Stop Sign e Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: II II II I Base Vol: 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 113 206 26 103 129 41 88 268 118 36 160 57 Added Vol: 0 14 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 15 0 0 0 0 5 5 30 10 0 30 0 Initial Fut: 128 220 26 105 139 46 93 298 128 36 190 59 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Volume: 146 249 29 119 158 53 105 338 146 41 216 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 146 249 29 119 158 53 105 338 146 41 216 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 146 249 29 119 158 53 105 338 146 41 216 67 Saturation Flow Module: II II II I Sat/Lane: 224 224 224 244 244 244 269 269 269 226 226 226 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 224 201 23 244 244 244 269 269 269 226 172 54 Capacity Analysis Module: II II II I Vol/Sat: 0.65 1.24 1.24 0.49 0.65 0.22 0.39 1.26 0.54 0.18 1.25 1.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Level Of Service Module: II II II I Delay/Veh: 11.9 112 111.7 6.4 11.7 2.3 4.4 118 7.9 2.0 117 116.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11.9 112 111.7 6.4 11.7 2.3 4.4 118 7.9 2.0 117 116.6 LOS by Move: C F F B C A A F B A F F Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR S 99GEN.OUT 7-1-98 3:16p Page 5 of 5 MITIG8 Wed Jul 1, 1998 15 : 22 : 42 Page 1-1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACT III TIGARD EXPANSION 1999 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR GENERATOR Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth St ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol ./Cap. (X) : 0 .486 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 19 .5 Optimal Cycle : 40 Level Of Service : C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 I I I I I I Control : Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 II II II Volume Module : Base Vol: 110 200 25 100 125 40 85 260 115 35 155 55 Growth Adj : 1.03 1 . 03 1. 03 1. 03 1. 03 1. 03 1. 03 1. 03 1. 03 1 . 03 1 . 03 1 . 03 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 14 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol : 15 0 0 0 0 5 5 30 10 0 30 0 -ial Fut : 128 220 26 105 140 46 93 298 128 36 190 59 : Adj : 1. 00 1 .00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 PhF Adj : 0 . 88 0 .88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 .88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 . 88 0 .88 0 . 88 PHF Volume: 146 250 29 119 159 53 105 338 146 41 216 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol : 146 250 29 119 159 53 105 338 146 41 216 67 PCE Adj : 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 MLF Adj : 1. 00 1 .00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 146 250 29 119 159 53 105 338 146 41 216 67 I I II I I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane : 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment : 0. 95 0 . 99 0 . 99 0 . 95 1. 00 0 . 85 0 . 95 1. 00 0 . 85 0 . 95 0 . 96 0 . 96 Lanes : 1. 00 0 . 90 0 . 10 1. 00 1.00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 0 .76 0 . 24 Final Sat. : 1805 1685 196 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 1392 432 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat : 0. 08 0 .15 0 .15 0 . 07 0 . 08 0 . 03 0 . 06 0 . 18 0 . 09 0 . 02 0 .16 0 . 16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle : 0.22 0 .31 0 .31 0 . 14 0 . 22 0 . 22 0 .12 0 . 39 0 .39 0 . 05 0 .32 0 .32 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0 .49 0 .49 0 .49 0 .37 0 . 15 0 .49 0 .46 0 .23 0 .46 0 .49 0 .49 I II II II Level Of Service Module : Delay/Veh: 21 . 9 18 . 8 18 . 8 27 .1 21 . 5 20 .1 28 .0 15 . 0 13 .3 32 .4 18 .2 18 . 2 User DelAdj : 1.00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1.00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 .00 F 'el/Veh: 21 . 9 18 . 8 18 . 8 27 . 1 21 . 5 20 . 1 28 .0 15 . 0 13 .3 32 .4 18 . 2 18 .2 C 3 6 1 3 4 1 3 7 3 1 5 2 **.****************************************************************************- Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Project Name: ACT Ill-Tigard Expansion Intersection: SW 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth St. Project Number. 2955 Conditions(year, alt.): _1997 EX PM Commuter Analyst: DMS Major Street Direction: EW (NS or EW) Date: 22-Jan-98 Major Street Speed: •4Q__. ` mph Filename: H:\PROJFILE\2955\QPRO\UNSIG.WB2 Population<10,0007 'NO .- (YES or NO) Factor Peak Hour->8th-Highest Hour Major Street: 7096':.x :; Minor Street 7096': ; Peak Hour Factor: 1894 - STOP? LTR ADT% Thru - YES -.21w -.,;-:_, x40%vy- � i Lanes s+x* -;i1 gz :`� ti,,-� Volumes `45 _ 175: ' 1.35 .4 Lanes Volumes K 4, u li Volumes Lanes t 90 71 R T66-321:: ';__+^ .>. STOP Controlled? ', YES '1X:4',' v = YES '?"STOP? Left-Through-Right Lane ;tC WW 375 4 f-,245 3 t" LTR Peak Hour/ADT% 10% -44 t 10% ADT% Upstream Thru Lanes„ x `9 li IL 145 V-` v .:''-..k1 Thru R T A Volumes . 170 '5704767 X40 Lanes ..,:; V. rA ,i` .��'t ":`'!'o YES .er.. h` +€ - 10% STOP? LTR ADT% Thru SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS eject Name: ACT III -Tigard Expansion / KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: 2955 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: DMS Portland, Oregon 97205 Date: 22-Jan-98 (503) 228-5230 Filename: H:\PROJFILE\2955\QPRO\UNSIG. Fax: (503) 273-8169 Intersection: SW 72nd Avenue/Dartmouth St. Conditions (yr, alt., etc.): 1997 EX PM Commuter GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Number of lanes for moving traffic: Major approach: 1 Minor approach: 1 Peak Hour Approach Volumes*: Sum of major approaches: 1105 vph Highest minor approach: 580 vph Factor Peak Hour—> 8th Highest Hour Major approach: 70% (60-80% acceptable) i Minor approach: 70% (60-80% acceptable) Is the population < 10,000 or speed > 40 NO Warrant Factor 100% REQUIRED ACTUAL VOLUMES 8TH HIGHEST HOUR #LANES #LANES MAJOR MINOR MAJOR MINOR MAJOR MINOR WARRANT MAJOR MINOR VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME MET STREET STREET BOTH APP HIGH APP BOTH APP HIGH APP BOTH APP HIGH APP 7 WARRANT 1 1 1 500 150 l'Vf"'''= ' 'fit := 773.5 406 '`„S�'SYS.�s , Minimum Vehicular Volume WARRANT 2 1 1 750 75 'l* k 4-.4M. 773.5 406 yL Interruption of Continuous Traffi n' �,�� ' 1105 580 'S`" 7 WARRANT 11 1 1 1105 175'T�k. '-1:ff5;` lxtcF $+{"`•.`...rsu. Peak Hour Volume Left-Turn Lane Warrant Analysis Worksheet UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Project Name: ACT Ill-Tigard Expansion Intersection: SW 72nd Avenue/Main Access Project Number: 2955 Conditions(year,alt): 1997 EX PM Commuter Analyst DMS Major Street Direction: NS (NS or E1IV) Date: 01-Jul-98 Major Street Speed: 40 mph Filename: H:IPROJFILE129551QPROIUNSIGMA.W Populationa10,000? -NO (YES or NO) Factor Peak Hour->8th-Highest Hour: Major Street: 70% - Minor Street: 70% Peak Hour Factor: 98°4;__ STOP? LTR ADT% Thru no te , ' ,.;, 10+% Lanes "1:,°r !^ ` ' �'. ,A, c . • is Volumes 45 295 Lanes Volumes IL 4' ail Volumes Lanes es ;0" s 3071 R _ ,•• STOP Controlled? -YES x'`.114l.: YES STOP? Left-Through-Right Lane ; `'�' .,�h -7 F a.� at ti LTR Peak Hour/ADT% 10% *. ,_ ;,,,,t;,,,,.. " r. 10% ADT% Upstream Thru Lanes . ,xft'+ 60,U K r-,, Thru R Volumes -90 = 430 Lanes - . a `..R,41 '°s,,ii-i"�x i< f, no -e;f �: 10%` STOP? LTR ADT% Thru LEFT-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS .ject Name: ACT III -Tigard Expansion ` / KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: 2955 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: DMS Portland, Oregon 97205 Date: 01-Jul-98 i 1 (503)228-5230 Filename: H:IPROJFILE129551QPRO\UNSIG Fax: (503)273-8169 Intersection: SW 72nd Avenue/Main Access Conditions (yr, alt., etc.): 1997 EX PM Commuter Storage LengthNehicle: i _ i 25 feet INPUTS & WARRANTS: NB SB CALCULATIONS: NB Advancing Volume 520 340 Critical Gap (Gc) 5.0 Opposing Volume 340 430 Exit Time (Te) 1.9 Left-Turn Volume 90 0 Walt Time (Tw) 1.39 %Left Turns (L) 17.3% 0.0% Manuever Time (T1) 3.0 Speed (mph) 40 40 Usable Gaps 138 Storage Probability 0.00000800 0.00000800 Blocked Time/hr 784.7 Warrant Utilization (3-veh) 0.0200 0.0200 Mean Headway (Ta) 6.92 4-vehicle 0.0532 0.0532 Mean Arrival Rate 53.1 5-vehicle 0.0956 0.0956 Mean Service Rate 938.4 6-vehicle 0.1414 0.1414 7-vehicle 0.1870 0.1870 RESULTS: 8-vehicle 0.2306 0.2306 9-vehicle 0.2714 0.2714 Utilization Factor 0.0565 10-vehicle 0.3092 0.3092 LT Lane Warranted? YES 11-vehicle 0.3441 0.3441 Storage Length (ft) 100 12-vehicle 0.3761 0.3761 Source:M.D. Harmelink,"Volume Warrants for Left-Turn Storage at Unsignalized Grade Intersections", Highway Research Record 211. A • CITY OFTICARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES �j+p+ °T'A�tt. (i�mmuntr� NON-RESIDENTIAL STAr- VLIe• 1 �r APPLICANT: L ' �t�Q` 1� (vtU. AGENT: Lori, ./a- Phone:( l Phone: I l 22e-D 48/ PROPERTY LOCATION: ,� / ADDRESS: 1 l Z� S cx) Par �'� .On LI wet y TAX MAP/TAX LOT: 1 s►"36 D SCY / NECESSARY APPLICATION'S]: 5I.- e Q e ()Ql?kuew 1p vie PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: -To add ..4ta5 fo c� I J c; e,.4.yl.¢k, �I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Geotara 1 eneuat et I ZONING DESIGNATION: (?e L'a. ( Co aicc r Q( C - G� CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACILITATOR: S2 -� TEAM AREA: PHONE: I503) LINING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ot size: 'Pa sq. ft. Average lot width: ft. Maximum building height: ys ft. cethacics: Front Ps/ ft. Side 4/4 ft. Rear •, !.� ft. Corner nr/it ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: SS % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: !S (Refer to Code Section 18.A2.050 I DDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQ111REMETS. Minimum lot frontage: 25 fee"unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition mus\have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The cepth of all lots shall not exc d 2'- times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applicao oning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots] - CITY OF T1CARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Pagel 018 i tuwoai inllcadsunauui o.Uuauc s.edu EXHIBIT 4 a . IPECIAL SETBACKS ,(� Streets: -3 O feet from the centerline of S (zJ -7Z��` ,)Q`-1`,4� Established areas: Ll/¢ feet from l9 . Lower intensity zones: t1/r) feet. along the site's /.e/9 boundary. Flag lot: 10-foot side yard setback. 4/Q' (Refer to Code Section and 18.961 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceotiona - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: . A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual building setbacks will be at least half (Vt) of the building's height: and The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.98.0201 `PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: t S race- C--76," e Je,y SSA,.s . Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): l 4troace- +c, Pz. -.6- (c <-2-• 77-vt'rµ„ i Secondary use required parking: k Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): /D I No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 8 inches x 18 feet. . Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.0201 Handicapped Parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided. as well as the parking stall dimensions. are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an ' appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: 'Al 1 Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. ( . Drive-in use queuing areas: /,, 4 `- [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108 .ITV OF T1&AA11 Pre-AOulIcat1on Canlerence Notes Page 2 of 8 Ot is I0ssUzl ioollcutsuPiiuIH QspirlautSractln WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses. to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial. institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical. walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring develo•ments [Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501 .OADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10.000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) ;LEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) 3UFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required: these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities. and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 The required •uffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ' feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. ' feet along south boundary. 17 R feet along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms. decorative walls. and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.108) CM OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 4011-tastaa.aal a.ollatl../na.■in Ouart.olSactl.. - SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code Section 18.1141 SENSITiVE LANDS '—� The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibilit1 of the aizolidiahL. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application, Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibi edy+rithin floodolain , i D SL— t 1E5� SN'Ltciii S w%!I H aate' +0 Le, L t'e-" 'f"D c"..ors 'vc7i- G�a 1v1gS 4G�e5S W2744.4c Meter to Code Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.B. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. IMBED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-14 Purpose: Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor , for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or l bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and ! - Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. . 1Y OFT1GAU h}dpotlesdes Caftans Nairn Pig$4 N t u11-$uJ1artial ii sUHuW!Noardusi fac73u • Location of Vegetated Corridor: In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract. and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3.Design for SWM] 'TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City: Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 1 two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D: Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed: and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.025] IMMGAT1ON Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable. the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged. by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property. the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or. with the consent of the owner, private property. ^ffY OFT16AR0 Pre-lloollcation Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 31ls1Id.uial Oeurui.ItS.cdu The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may. with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(Dl 41,-.(0521/i- -tp°rll—a �r SUBDIVISION PLAT fRVAT10N Z"" r °' "`"`e��`'` �dT—`'� °1 - Prior to submitting a Subdivision land use application with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a .ubdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/res - -tion for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives th- faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: s . :-; :841 NARRATIVES The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) , A �eLt ,`tM 5X..d cf.4 e �,n.o(.y CODE SECTIONS "c7-7,T 4't (`- 18.80 _ 18.92 .J" 1�00 1108 _L1 .120 L`7-8.150 18.84 _ 18.96 _ ' 18)O2 114 _ 18.130 18.160 18.88 18.98 _, 48.106 ,1116 _ 18.134 18.1 .164 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards. and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests. the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement. or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32.Section.0501 When a condition of approval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32.Section.2501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will nct be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] CITY Of T1GARD Pr '-AAplIcatfon Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NOM-lu:u•.aaiiinicin.uru..uIo.p.rt sitSIcn.. 1 BUILDING PERMITS Plans for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has been issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. RECYCLING Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Section 18.116] ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: 0 ( v^‘1 a,..,..c;\,42_ S`f—✓e Ems cc40(le,:liS ICJ e/P Y SGusS IN - - o .�, Cv -7 4 I O v+4 Q a 7 z1-c• . �W. k / 44. / IS/' Arl - .Q - .d i 7 - . •1r- - ' 4 Ls.-Q S• Q _ �� _ :, -1--4=s 1, .. .. /I i• • ..•L .�, u a' • _ _ �. �f�:. ' ' o •..:e _4_J)..I sil • .' . -(2. i NM • . A .• /. • .. • . I • , . -are- v• -Y_ ` �� ,tA 7 4- S"i-.t,4.�.�4��, .j¢a-vi 5«! 4.- 47. owt--. l�`,.i �� / foss) . 0 er w.0-I < i,---.1 /�`� ems-444-k�s f 12 v e-474,-- L.� li s ‘10 t 10),..... . S2m Wes/�, st.�.S,4...„ t.-- / a / b�� t--<).5" dtSz;:,s,--zp PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81:" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre—AoplIcation Conference Motes Page 7 of 8 M-unifies jiI iupuciomplini.l Dsnrt.sit Sactisu The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard P(4...4;'''``4.\� Cam•`4"/54-147i . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process available from the Plaruring Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thi4 pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following thi' conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: t414 ` CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE (503]639-4171 FAX: (503]684-7297 Jo�l>r\Dtatrykiu stars +jntaoi<.ast altuortp Sicilia:asston\Dmse- .00ll N1u-97 "ITY OF nun D Pre-Agoilcatlon Conference Motes Page 8 of 8 /NIUUnusl inllczIisiiPaulin l.urtaut Seale' (51 ,c, pc. -5- ) J ^ City of Tigard, Oregon PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (t,r -7Z-- Ate to feet from centerline. / 1t ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: / (,!)� �(Z street improvements will be necessary along BUJ c-- ( ) street improvements will be necessary along ( � Street improvements on �,n( 72- A. shall include - feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector 13 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engmeennq Department$ecoon streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or. at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW - +�� - . Prior to o. , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee -lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Pedestria nways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) • IC inch line which is located in . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to `TG- POD ir-i'-i �ts� CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Enqmeennq Dever/molt Section Water Supply: The 1 . \a ' . Water District - Phone:(503) 2`\ S351 provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. • 77-c, SS1L.cI1.4.., AD0v r J 64`1 rj(r DK,--K . '( 1• 'Lt? t Af t64- -6.1A-t" TT ACDiTicr.ia— UaP-o oCes Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. /\ 1 STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineenp Department Section 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be -..s. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with t e development application. It is anticipated that this project will require_= .c c friV Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Fz7P___ r �} Payment of the fee in-lieu. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIE) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. 5,-,1(--/ cr1G1 Std 1 . PERMITS ' If.kP1.ai F (---P-e6f 72 Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. i9jyCompliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 ingmenmq Department$etuon 1 NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Department. Building Department Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: 11/( (q7 ( (q7 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 n uogm\Qattykoreapo eng (Master section preapp-r mst) December 23. 1996 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Ueoutmen!Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .�,, APPLICATION CHECKLIST l 'ill CRY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: IAA(3&P Date: 1 r /i /F 7 I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed J=z/ D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 2J E) Filing Fee 5P9 • I SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 2-G 1 . Vicinity map c2/ 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils C 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands a� 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings (b) Trees with 6" ± caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements c� 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LSE APPLICATION/LIST PACE CF 5 B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies ZQ 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 'a✓� 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas 4�/l (c) Loading and services area et// (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ • (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities p/ 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios a� (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) q.�_—_--- (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals a� (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated , LAND USE APPLICATION/UST PACE 2 CF ; D) Architectural Drawings Indicating: No. of Copies Z.1) - The site development plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures Cam' proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies Z. The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ❑ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials vv---- 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part e Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to cons uct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . The owner of th subject parcel c 2. The owner's autf�orized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of pa cel location and boundaries c 5. Location, width an es of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacen to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees wi. in 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities andJtiiity easements El 1 1 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way . ation and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the pr...sed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not prec de efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LANG USE APPUCVION J UST ?.,CE 3 OF 3 1) Subdivision Preliminary Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies a .. 1 . Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 2C0 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ( ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City7established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than/ 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private rightof-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary aed storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains includibg fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses i ❑ (fl Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other Iand encumbrances ' ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 1 1 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasopable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision / ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 1 7. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be*own on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative a`ad submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION J UST PACE 4 OF 5 . J) Solar Access Calculatio : o K) Other Information No. of Copies /0 cV %1Gfr( v4.5 klea*-16 h:logfrOpatty∎mastersUtld ist.mst May 23,1995 LANG USE APPUcATION J LIST PACE 3 OF 5 & kilo+ 5 TVA ACT III Tigard Cinemas Addition Neighborhood Meeting MEETING MINUTES Meeting Date: February 18, 1998 _ Attending: David Gellos TVA Allan Norris TVA Mark Vandehey Kittelson & Associates Dina Sykora Kittelson & Associates Brady Berry W&HP John and Carla Webber 12155 SW Wildwood, p: 684.5522 Paul Simmons Cub Foods M. Fletcher Westside Academy Doyle Beach 11530 SW 72nd Avenue, p: 684.0647 John and Darlene Wozniak 14200 SW Fern, p: 524.6429 Gordon S. Martin 12265 SW 72nd Avenue, p: 620.2477 Distribution: Attendees Prepared by: Allan Norris Pursuant to the requirements set forth by the City of Tigard, the informational neighborhood meet- ing with regard to preliminary plans contemplated for the proposed project referenced above was held at the City of Tigard. Noted below are comments generated by attendees during the design team's presentation of the proposed project: The design team presented the general conceptual design for the parking lot expansion and auditorium addition to the existing facility. The design team stated the project generally com- prised reduction of the existing focility seat count, and addition of six auditoriums resulting in a net increase in seating capacity for the faciliy of approximately 300 seats. The existing facility V\ACTT\TIGARD\VVPMETTEIts\MTGMIN.rxy EXHIBIT 5 seat capacity is approximately 2,739, and the approximate 300 seat addition in six auditori- ums results in a total facility capacity of 3,039. Materials proposed for use would be compati- ble with those already used on the building. Kittelson & Associates presented the proposed revisions being considered to the existing parking lot and the design direction being considered for the new cinemas parking lot with access/egress to 72nd Avenue. 1) An attendee suggested eliminating the existing drive at 72nd Avenue, and offered for consideration, use of the proposed new drive located at the north end of the existing parking lot. The attendee thought by eliminating the existing driveway romp from 72nd Avenue, the theater would be able to increase the quantity of parking spaces. The atten- dee thought such on arrangement would mitigate vehicles using the parking lot as a connection to Highway 99W. The attendee noted the roadway in front of the theater as being very pedestrian unfriendly. An attendee thought the proposed new driveway from the existing parking lot should be at least as wide as the present driveway with a special left turn lane. Another attendee suggested the design team consider eliminating the proposed new driveway on 72nd Avenue to the new parking lot and use Tri Met's parking lot to access the new theater parking lot. The attendee thought a vehicle/pedestrian bridge connecting the existing parking lot to the new lot should be considered. 2) An attendee noted his understanding that City of Tigard staff has indicated 72nd Ave- nue has exceeded its capaciy and that 72nd Avenue cannot take any more traffic. 3) Attendees were in favor of providing additional parking for the theater so that patrons do not pork on Cub Foods' parking lot. An attendee suggested the 'connection" be- tween the Tri-Met parking lot and the new parking lot align with the drive aisle lending to 72nd Avenue. The attendee suggested if a road were constructed extending to Dartmouth from the entry drive off of Highway 99, it would relieve traffic on the main cinemas entry drive. 4) Several attendees suggested a second foot bridge could be constructed across the wetlands, connecting the Tri-Met parking lot with the existing theater parking lot. It was suggested the second pedestrian bridge would help promote use of the Tri-Met parking lot. An attendee thought the code requirement for parking was based on people using bicycles and walking which is impractical. Generally, the attendees wonted to be cer- tain the project provided adequate parking. 5) Many attendees were generally not in favor of the Tigard Triangle Plan and noted this issue needs to be addressed. Attendees thought Atlantic Street had already been de- fined, located and will be going in, and wanted to be certain the cinemas project was properly coordinated in this regard. Several attendees wanted to know if interim striping along 72nd Avenue similar to Cub Foods would be provided, and suggested other parties such as O.E.A. should participate in the street improvement to 72nd Avenue. 6) An attendee noted a concern for public safety regarding the left turn from McDonald's on to 72nd Avenue, and acknowledged it did not relate to the cinemas project. 7) An attendee noted a concern about theft to cars parked on the theater lot during show times and suggested it would be helpful if the theater would adjust the movie start times such that the parking lot was occupied by patrons more consistently. 8) Several attendees thought it was a good idea for the cinemas to use the Tri-Met lot, if such an arrangement could be worked out. 9) An attendee noted traffic on the cinemas private access rood in front of the dance school is a hazard for children and parents that access and egress the Westside Academy building. The attendee noted existing speed bumps are not slowing drivers down, and suggested the cinemas project investigate ways to slow traffic. 10) An attendee suggested the cinemas design team consider pedestrian crossing signage be installed at crossings along the main cinemas access/egress in proximity to the Westside Academy where patrons of their facility are using Tri-Met's parking lot. 1 1) Attendees suggested the applicant consider a full street improvement rather than half street improvement at 72nd Avenue. 12) The design team stated the sidewalk from 72nd Avenue to the site requires further study due to challenging terrain. 13) An attendee questioned how it could be possible to expand the facility and meet the code requirement for parking. The design team advised the reduction of seating within the existing facility, coupled with the proposed new parking lot allowed for the code parking requirement to be satisfied. If any omissions or misrepresentations are noted, please provide written notification to Allan Norris at Thompson Vaivoda & Associates. V\ACT3\TK,ARD\WPVfTTER5\MTGMIN.DOc DATE \I CS) (901 F) TIME 1 '• _pm•TVA r ` ` PROJECT /\ r 1 PROJECT NO. q . r 0 Thompson Vaivoda r 11 II �/ 14 Associates CONFERENCE FIELDI I MEMO PHONE NO. ^� Architects AIA WITH 1010 Southwest 1101 Avenue Portland,Oregon 97205 BT voice 503.220.0668 PAGE OF fax 503.225.0803 email tva@tvapdx.com SUBJECT "\E-I x) M.r-,, Tt N ( - 1 - OP p ___LNIA-)A5-- Ar-il:217 , ow NrE A__44,,, Npr,„_ ___, 11,,7 v\I hill- -Eli 1() . f• ----‘9----z, -,_ _,... -<?:, 6'7.PL ,4 lee 44 Z /07-/SS S.Le) • G-)i Lvcr�6 G F z/-S k .10 11144/ GY.0 -06114 e g4 c- — L SMNf S eLf.6 4"S - .; if-R . t4 Zlt%1 idai 103' -5-5 1f5- 3v _i--A/ 72 c,84 O6Y (-400th% 0a2.4.111W iye0c1 Sw f S2Y=6Y7 7 At.d.a.,,t jr/z,76 0..26.,f t,--` 7 -- � ►� = w j,,,,c, 62G- 09S5- • TVA COFY February 3, 1998 Owner Name Address Tigard, OR 97223 (or City of Absentee Owner) RE: Act Ill Theaters Inc., Tigard Cinemas s Dear Interested Party, Thompson Vaivoda & Assoc. is representing the owner of the property located at 11626 S.W. Pacific Highway. We are considering a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: n Wednesday, February 18, 1998 Tigard City Hall 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Town Hall Room 7:00 p.m. W Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 220-0668 if you have any questions. _ w Sincerely: 0 ///// 1 • Allan J. Norri ° v:\act3\tigard\wp\letters\tig-nebr.doc Principals Robert L.Thompson.PAIA Edward Vaivoda Jr...AlA David P.Cellos.ALA Kurt K.Schultz.AlA Associates James P.Bocci Marc A.Labadie Gregory S.Mitchell Allan J.Norris TVA C PY February 4, 1998 Mark Roberts, Planner Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Act III Tigard Cinemas Addition Notice of Neighborhood Meeting Site Address: 1 1626 S. W. Pacific Highway o Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mark: In accordance with the City of Tigard Development Code, please find enclosed a copy of the affidavit substantiating that property owners within 250 foot radius from the subject site were notified via United States Mail on Tuesday February 3, 1998, regarding the above referenced contemplated project. For your information, and immediate reference, please find enclosed a copy of the document prepared by First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon listing the property owners and addresses we relied upon as being accurate. The letter was also mailed to the City of Tigard East Community Involvement Teams from the list provided at the pre-application g. meeting. Please do not hesitate to call me directly with any questions or comments in this regard. Sincerely: 114 ao Allan J. Norris Enclosures 0 Principals Robert L.Thompson.FALA Edward Vaivoda Jr..AIA David P.Cellos.ALA Kurt K.Schultz.AlA Associates James P.Bocci Marc A.Labadie Gregory S.Mitchell Allan J.Norris AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING C ° Y PY STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Al lan J. Norris , being duly sworn, depose and say that on February 3, , 19 98 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 11626 c W Pari f it Hwy Ti gars, OR a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Pioneer Station, 520 SW Morrison, Portland, OR with postage prepaid thereon. i 0 iy4111- 4/(1 Signature ( • the Pfesence of a Notary Pubiic) (This SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ..5— day ofi 199r "•a.•., OFFICIAL SEAL ` BETTE JEAN OWEN , / . NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON a CCUMISSION NO 0.59428 '�_ : '.� a `.uJ Mr COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV 29. 2noo NOT RY PU. L!C OF OREGON My Commission Expires: ,//a.9/.2 f apoiicn.ct Diease complete in<or-axon below for proper placement with proposed project ` 'ANE OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED l\L-MME: . •-. - •., • , ss. PE OF PROPOSED DEVE LOPNM Th .— ' s-u,. -ddition to existin• buildin• '.Name oL pplicanc`Owner Tnnmpsc�n Vaivoda & Associates/Act III Theaters, Inc. :Address or CGzaeral ^cncc of Suojer_?r perry 11626 S.W. Pacific Hwy Y Tigard, OR 97223 Suo;ec ?roc e:-rTo_: Mao'_; `ad Lac=(_): Mar- 1 51 6 DC LOT: 500 ------------------ ---- TVA COPY February 12, 1998 Mark Roberts, Planner Community Development Department City of Tigard s 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Act III Tigard Cinemas Addition Sign posting of Neighborhood Meeting Site Address: 11626 S. W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mark: In accordance with the City of Tigard Development Code, please find enclosed a copy of the affidavit substantiating that a sign was posted at a location easily visible from S. W. 72' Avenue notifying neighbors of the impending neighborhood meeting. For your information, and immediate reference, please find enclosed a copy of the sign, measuring 2 feet by 3 feet, that was posted stating the proposed Site Development Review for the addition to the existing building and the parking lot addition. Please do not hesitate to call me directly with any questions or comments in this regard. Sincerely: Allan.). No N ou Enclosures a a 0 a Principals Robert L.Thotppson.FAIA Edward Vaivoda Jr..AIA David P.Cellos.AlA Kurt K.Schultz.AIA Associates James P.Bocci Marc A.Labadie Gregory S.Mitchell Allan J.Norris • AFFID itriT OF POSTING NOTICE IC py WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF'iHE SIGN POSTING,RETURN TSLS AFFIDAVIT TO: .. •..:City o Ti . PiAnningDivtssoa. • ." 13I2b b-W Hall Bodlevard.'. • • „ . Ti gard,OR 97223 I, Allan icrr;s , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed Parking lot, 6 Auditorium Addition affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 11626 S.W. Pacific Hwy. , and did on the 7 day of February 19 98 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Site Development Review application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at S.W. 72nd Avenue, South of McDonalds (state location you posted notice on property) • / AA/0 Ignature (In i e pr=.ence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/afflrmed before me on the /2 day of .c. <!L , 199/ OFFICIAL SEAL f— (LI-n/1 •f BETTE JEAN OWEN NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY FU:IC OF OREGON ■ %Ci4MEXPIR NO.NOV 29, 2 Commission Expires: ///�2 9/a00° MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NV 29, 2000 My p (_-Apolica_r please complete intorr auon below for proper placement arch proposed proiect) •�¢E OF PROJ ME ECT OR PROPOSED NA : ' - OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of Applicant/Owner. _ { { address or C•ener,i Lacston of Subject P'operrr LSuoject ?-over Tic Niao(s) and Lot=(s): – ---------------------------------- n�fcXn• �a•,r.yte"1\ytpoi7�sl COPY MEETING NOTICE ACT III THEATERS IS PROPOSING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR A PARKING LOT ADDITION AT THIS LOCATION AND A SIX-AUDITORIUM ADDITION TO THE EXISTING CINEMAS Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, the applicants would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1998 7:00 P.M. TIGARD CITY HALL TOWN HALL ROOM 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TICARD, OR 97223 PROJECT DEVELOPER CONTACT: ALLAN NORRIS PHONE NUMBER: 220-0668 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. * THANK YOU FOR USING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE * Washington County *********************************************************************** . * P n * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION lvJ * Reference Parcel # : 1S136DC 00500 * Parcel Number :R0285293 TRSQ: 01S-01W-36-SE SW * Owner :TOM MOYER THEATRES * CoOwner * Site Address : 11626 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD 97223 * Mail Address : 1000 SW BROADWAY #1050 PORTLAND OR 97205 * Telephone :Owner 503-223-0820 Tenant * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * Transferred: 05/01/89 Loan Amount . * Document # : 19393 Lender * Sale Price : Loan Type * Deed Type Interest Rate : * % Owned Vesting Type : * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * Land : $1, 861, 630 Exempt Amount : * Structure : $3 , 484 , 130 Exempt Type . * Other % Improved : 65 * Total : $5, 345 , 760 Levy Code : 02381 * 96-97Taxes : $74 , 004 . 58 School Dist :TIGARD * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * Map Grid: 655 G3 Class Code : * Census :Tract 307 . 00 Block 1 * NbrhdCd : ZPHY MillRate : 13 . 8436 * Sub/Plat : * Land Use :2012 COM, IMPROVED * Legal :ACRES 10 . 12 * * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * Bedrooms Lot Acres : 10 . 12 Year Built : * Bathrooms Lot SqFt :440, 827 EffYearBlt : * Heat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: * Pool BsmUnfinSF: Foundation : * Appliances : Bldg SqFt : Roof Shape : * Dishwasher : lstFlrSqFt : Roof Matl . * Hood Fan UpperFlSF : InteriorMat : * Deck Porch SqFt : Paving Matl : * Garage Type : Attic SqFt : Const Type : * Garage SF Deck SqFt : Ext Finish: ******************************************************************************* n, The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. SWV4 SEI/4 SECTION 3 TIS WASHINGTON COUNTY EGO!, SEE MAP 15 1 3608 • SCALE lan 100 o 1 MAIMXR w 01 s. 01-1 40 n MAP 6 I 36Q8 al M° ��f. ;,.„%C•M ■ A 'o r— INC SEE MAP I 2 a1 I. 500 IS 1 E60A 0 0 Ip /0.11 Ay. • ' A:pl'I 11- a /' ,Al-1 H OJ ti�•t{ reiii I x A. /0:1. I ~ N TS / �twtI •M•10'[ 1•S•O ~ 8 Q ••LSa . 1 I.O f 300 I _ .9 � 2 , w 110.•• R/ r — .. z,2 — _ r ,00 200 a/s ' 0.1fAt. : J6Ac It • 30$ • _ .1t4 C f f / • 1 40 It• _0 1 IS I=! It 71 ...:�-mI K`': = M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y R E P O R T = Washington (OR) County ***************************************** * Date : 02/03/98 * Time : 8 :20 :46 * Report Type : User Format * Sort Type : Parcel Number * Target Properties Selected: 16 ***************************************** ********************* * SEARCH PARAMETERS * ********************* ********************************************************************* * ITEMS SELECTED INDEX USED ********************************************************************* * * * 1S136DB 02603 Reference Parcel * 1S136DB 02602 * * 1S136DB 02600 * * 1S136DB 02501 * * 1S136DA 02100 * * 1S136DA 00902 * 1 * 1S136DC 04500 * 1S136DC 02503 * * 1S136DC 02504 * * 1S136DC 03200 * * 1S136DC 03100 * * 1S136DC 03000 * * 1S136DC 00400 * * 1S136DC 00301 * * 1S136DC 00300 * * 1S136DC 00200 * ********************************************************************* Page 1 * 1 * First American/Washington ' Owner: OREGON EDUCATION ASSN Parcel : R0284686 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd: Mail : 6900 SW HAINES RD TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Us 2002 VACANT, COMMERCIAL Land: $501 , 850 T :phone : 503-684-3300 Thomas Bros : Imp : Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DA 00902 96-97 Tax: $6, 947 . 3E Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 345, 866B1dg Sf : Ac : 7 . 94 * 2 * First American/Washington Owner: BEACH DAYLE D EVELYN 0 Parcel : R0284864 Site : 11530 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 11530 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $124 , 210 Telephone : 503-620-3727 Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp: $4 , 910 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DA 02100 96-97 Tax: $1, 787 .45 Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 40, 510 Bldg Sf : Ac : . 93 * 3 * First American/Washington Owner: WEBBER PROPERTIES LLC Parcel : R0285186 Site : 11632 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 09/10/97 Mail : Price : Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $172 , 780 Telephone : Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $451, 250 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DB 02501 96-97 Tax: $8 , 638 . 82 Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 30 , 056 Bldg Sf : Ac : . 69 * 4 * First American/Washington Owner: STEWART PHYLLIS T Parcel : R0285202 Site : 11590 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 621 ENGLEWOOD DR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 Price : Use : 2002 VACANT, COMMERCIAL Land: $750 , 970 Telephone : Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : M )and Tax Lot : 1S136DB 02600 96-97 Tax: $10 , 396 . 1 Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 159, 865B1dg Sf : Ac : 3 . 67 ii, * 5 * First American/Washington Owner: STEWART PHYLLIS Parcel : R0285220 Site: 11596 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 12/28/93 Mail : 621 ENGLEWOOD DR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 Price : Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $233 , 450 Telephone : Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $134 , 800 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DB 02602 96-97 Tax: $5, 097 . 93 Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 34 , 412 Bldg Sf : Ac : . 79 * 6 * First American/Washington Owner: THOMAS ALFRED E;JUNE R Parcel : R0285257 Site: 7135 SW BAYLOR ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 04/10/89 Mail : 7135 SW BAYLOR ST TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use : 101f RES, IMPROVED Land: $55, 580 Telephone : 503-639-3650 Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp: $98, 250 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 00200 96-97 Tax: $2, 129 . 56 Bedrm: 4 Bth: 2 . 00 YB: 1947 Lot Sqft : 24 , 393 Bldg Sf : 2, 730 Ac : . 56 * 7 * First American/Washington Owner: WOZNIAK JOHN G;DARLENE M Parcel : R0285266 Site : 11550 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 01/08/96 Mail : 14200 SW FERN ST TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use : 1012 RES, IMPROVED Land: $51, 870 Telephone : Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $118 , 069 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 00300 96-97 Tax: $2 , 352 . 58 B y: 3 Bth: 2 . 00 YB: 1945 Lot Sqft : 21, 780 Bldg Sf : 2 , 800 Ac : . 50 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 8 * First American/Washington Owner : BUEHLER JAMES D;MELISSA S Parcel : R0285275 Site : 7175 SW BAYLOR ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 01/24/94 Mail : 7175 SW BAYLOR ST TIGARD OR 97223 Price : UF''''i 1012 RES, IMPROVED Land : $51, 870 T, phone : Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $109, 820 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 00301 96-97 Tax: $2 , 238 . 31 Bedrm: 4 Bth: 3 . 00 YB : 1964 Lot Sqft : 14 , 810 Bldg Sf : 2 , 633 Ac : . 34 * 9 * First American/Washington Owner : CHASE WILLIAM L VIOLET Parcel : R0285284 Site : 11580 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 11580 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use : 1012 RES, IMPROVED Land: $47, 550 Telephone : 503-639-7582 Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $53 , 510 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 00400 96-97 Tax: $1, 399 . 03 Bedrm: 3 Bth: 1 . 00 YB : 1954 Lot Sqft : 11, 325 Bldg Sf : 1 , 170 Ac : . 26 * 10 * First American/Washington Owner : HORNE WILLIAM I ;ROBBIE L Parcel : R0285569 Site : 7160 SW BAYLOR ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 7160 SW BAYLOR ST TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $67 , 000 Use : 1012 RES, IMPROVED Land: $51, 870 Telephone : 503-639-2250 Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $94 , 500 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 03000 96-97 Tax: $2 , 026 . 29 Bedrm: 4 Bth: 2 . 00 YB : 1955 Lot Sqft : Bldg Sf : 2 , 552 Ac : * 11 * First American/Washington Owner: AMACHER JUANITA Parcel : R0285578 Site: 11680 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 04/30/93 Mail : 10080 SW MARJORIE LN BEAVERTON OR 97008 Price : Use : 1012 RES, IMPROVED Land: $51, 870 Tel phone : Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $67, 030 M. and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 03100 96-97 Tax: $1, 646 . 01 Bearm: 3 Bth: 2 . 00 YB: 1955 Lot Sqft : Bldg Sf : 1 , 512 Ac : * 12 * First American/Washington Owner: FEGLES MARY A Parcel : R0285587 Site: 11720 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 04/19/90 Mail: 11720 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use : 1012 RES, IMPROVED Land: $51, 870 Telephone : 503-639-3772 Thomas Bros : 655 G3 Imp : $86, 430 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 03200 96-97 Tax: $1, 810 . 75 Bedrm: 4 Bth: 2 . 00 YB: 1956 Lot Sqft : Bldg Sf : 2, 250 Ac : * 13 * First American/Washington Owner: LURIA MARK T Parcel : R2036292 Site : 7500 SW DARTMOUTH RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 07/29/94 Mail : 10000 N 31ST AVE #C100 PHOENIX AZ 85051 Price : $2, 780 , 000 Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $407, 720 Telephone : Thomas Bros : Imp : $1, 404 , 540 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 02503 96-97 Tax: $25 , 088 .2 Bedrm: Bth: YB : 1993 Lot Sqft : 87, 120 Bldg Sf : Ac : 2 . 00 * 14 * First American/Washington Owner: WAREMART INC Parcel : R2036293 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd: 11/15/94 Mail : PO BOX 5756 BOISE ID 83705 Price: $7, 233 , 101 Use : 2002 VACANT, COMMERCIAL Land: $642 , 160 Telephone : Thomas Bros : Imp : Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 02504 96-97 Tax: $8 , 889 . 81 B : Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 137, 214Bldg Sf : Ac : 3 . 15 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • • * 15 * First American/Washington Owner: TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN Parcel : R2045221 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Xferd: 01/13/95 Mail : 4012 SE 17TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97202 Price : U:'=‘,i 9452 MISC, OTHER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Land: $357 , 930 T }phone : 503-239-3000 Thomas Bros : Imp : Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DB 02603 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 87, 555 Bldg Sf : Ac : 2 . 01 * 16 * First American/Washington Owner: WAREMART INC Parcel : R2045946 Site : 7500 SW DARTMOUTH RD TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 3336 E 32ND ST #217 TULSA OK 74135 Price : Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $1, 544 , 050 Telephone : Thomas Bros : Imp : $4 , 976 , 140 Map and Tax Lot : 1S136DC 04500 96-97 Tax: $90 , 262 . E Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 395, 960B1dg Sf : Ac: 9 . 09 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • TVA -20 OWNER-OCCUPIED '< Doyle & Evelyn Beach ; 11530 SW 72' Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 e" - n Thomas &June Alfred 7135 SW Baylor Street Tigard, OR 97223 0 James & Melissa Buehler S 7175 SW Baylor Street Tigard, OR 97223 n William & Violet Chase 11580 SW 72'd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 a William & Robbie Horne 7160 SW Baylor Street o Tigard, OR 97223 Mary Fegles W 11720 SW 72' Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 0 W ABSENTEE OWNERS m - o Oregon Education Association No site address 6900 SW Haines Road Tigard, OR 97223 • a Webber Properties llC Site address: 11632 SW Pacific Hwy (no mailing address) Tigard, OR 97223 Principals Robert I..Thumps.m.F:\l\ Edward Vaivoda Jr.,MA David P.Cellos.MA Kurt K.Schultz.ALA Associates James P.&ai Marc A.Labadie Gregory S.Mitchell Allan J.Norris TVA, Phyllis Stewart Site address: 11590 SW Pacific Hwy 621 Englewood Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phyllis & Donato Stewart Site address: 11596 SW Pacific Hwy 621 Englewood Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 John & Darlene Wozniak Site address: 11550 SW 72' Avenue 14200 SW Fern Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Juanita Amacher Site address: 11680 SW 72' Avenue 10080 SW Margorie Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Beaverton, OR 97008 Mark Luria Site address: 7500 SW Dartmouth Rd. 10000 N 31' Avenue #C1 00 Tigard, OR 97223 Phoenix, AZ 85051 Waremart Inc. No site address P.O. Box 5756 Boise, ID 83705 Waremart Inc. Site address: 7500 SW Dartmouth Rd. 3336E 32' Street #217 Tigard, OR 97223 Tulsa, OK 74135 Tri-County Metropolitan No site address 4012 SE 17* Avenue Portland, OR 97202 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS • Craig Hopkins 7430 SW Varns Street Tigard, OR 97223 -TVA Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91' Street Tigard, OR 97223 Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 9722'3 'Sue Rorman • 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Exh ; i9ii- e FROM •PCT III 1998.06-25 10: 14 #9i6 P.01/01 ... � .-.. 1 �.. Yr... ....� Yya •rrr /i{ YD• VV 111\. =CPU O r I If ME:IMES ro= 1 503 241 2999 SUN 2s, 1996 a:50Frl !t47 P_ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF T16ARp 13123 5W Haft 5Iterlf., 7 g3re. QR 97272 (:,t73) C.3P-41:1 FAX: (5 03) 581-7297 PENERAL,liIF c-APP. RELD MTh: W.TE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/LoCetion(5.): 11626 SW Pacific Highway E Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): Map 151 36D13 SW, Tax Lot 500; C4 se NC.(s): M S 014er Case No.(s): me size: 10. 12 acres and 4.46 acres = 14. 58 acres RE-iipt NG.: attachment See Applieat.=A rl gy property Dwhcrr/Deed Haider(s)r; e Da tm: Addres6:r„r _ _ Fxhone City: _ _ _ - bp: _ Dais Determined To Be Complete: Applicant% Eastpate Theatre, Inc. Address: 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 Phone: 221-0213 Corp pfaN?tee Designation; C]ty: Portland, OR =ip. • Men Iv and the aolDeznt are diterent peoAle. tlyfi appil:1n1 Cil Area: Wh - must txs, the purrhas$r Crf record cr lessee in pons sin with written, �,r.sa,r+r s,�,„Q,r,p,r=„e r„„� authorization from the owner or an agent at the owner. The c wngr(r.) must sicln this arpplicgnoh in the space provided t n the S9eit of thi: lam or submit a written autfttirantit ri with this a¢pitio n. — – REQVIREP.IMMIDAL Q.ElliEhrrs RPe4u4L-S1JW 11 Agcy . � ApDtiz2ltit7n Elements submitted: ,'he GwnErR of record of the sub' O Apprication Form t property requ_sI Site Development Review approval to allow(please be sPetiflcJ_ C.1 Owner's Signature/Written Au11 arfzaVon To obtain Site Development Review (SDR) approval in Title 'Transfer instrument tx!Deed for an ex ansion of the Ci SiferRot Platt pa!caplet bid on ere.sep enec t rrs1J r — fir Satr:'lot Plan (reduced 8h`x 1 1`) x `i Q sWpli=gilt's Statement .�^ rt of cvar:oaseo avt pre-app eitalit Sri) Cor+son Cos: Estimate n USA Sewer Use Information Card rtmtrtoutetweamp+etee at IaKiioallon submittal, D klirtS Foe mods/s oao+._..,..5 BQC.00 - -� rstBacte.s•a.nor.,..51.E+d0.(10 Pi wrrr a T..... • r ss s,a.aom EXHIBIT 6 V/Z a6ed`•Vi V# X4P/'`•WVZ0:01 86/S0/ 14 -AI1d2U H '8 0 :Aq luas FROM:ACT III THEATRES TU: 5032202480 .TLN 25' 1998 10:42 AM t4475 P.03 FROM:ACT I I I THEPTRES TO' 1 SO3 241 19D] JUN 25. 1'998 B'ri0rar9 1:l4 713 p.td3 ice any V RLANCt. CONotriortAL, USE, SENSrttl+e LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS tt, be considered as rt of this .pplIcatlon: DPLICANTS: ewtsider an application ttsMpht*, you Win need to Submit ALL of the 1 QU _eribed on the front of this appticatinn In tho`Roquifnd Subrtaina, Etamenta' bo - Wed Submittal Requirement hntarTnabon stews can by obtained, upon request, tar atl types cif Land Use Appikations.) • APPUWANT(S) SHALL.CERTIFY THAT: IttQ ve r idQ _sa ylvlt dly"ig ret;ent h I bM G'Yh SS rltf?l�lYf UM= if the dpaccatinn in granted, the appfcant+ czercbe tt►e rights granter in a=.-Kt:l nce with tie tarrns and subject to all the conditions and moms of die approval. AJI of the above statements and the staternenis plot plan, artatrrncnts, cr.-J eshlbits Oansmitled herewith, are trvc: 8hd the appizints so ocknowiedge that any permit issuad; fz st:c on thy appt:at oqi. may be te+roked V it}s found that any such 5:atements are Boise. The appDcint has read the entre contents of flit apprizabon, including this Wi es and ataxia. and understands the ecit eft enm tar approving ar denying the apptigtiort SIGNATURES of gach ownr.r of the r ilitn:t kmj DATta 2.5 TM Clay f JL4 J _ Tia k•t NA a*Mr Tt~Lgter4tuo AN ehRec.0.4 Fier?' Signature t�ant is Signarui- c. ec Signature Ownsr's i naturt ��► Phyll s T. Stewart } Dte:V/9— b/C' a�B,�`.b�b# ^�Y1�7 �WV�[1:Cll RFi/�'i�/ Gl 11`Z_S kl7 2005 -,I -VH H :Aa lU? PROPERTY OWNERS 1. Tom Moyer Theaters, an Oregon partnership, 1000 South Broadway, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 97205, telephone: (503) 241-1111 2. Phyllis T. Stewart ?DX 1A-148967.1 2.5180-M06 q/y afed`•bZ'#1 X `•WwO:OI 06/50/ ll `•L9Zl17ZZCO -Al1V H H V 0 :Aq 1ua ExkAi+ 7 NOV-24-98 14:40 FROM-FIDELITY OUST SERVICE + T-021 P.02/06 F-909 f 4} - ....... . .._ .__....�.._..__. «..... 1 CO F.. . ...1 r-1' 1 '- _`k• . 4 "'00 - LI 89-19393 'J-J r..a+JrgiliA cownq .;r , Until a change is requested, all tax stateeents are to be sent to f ' 1 ) the following nano and address: Tnonas P. Moyer 1 t Medlaal Services Hldg., suite 900 1 1 919 SW Taylor . Portland, Oregon 97205 1 ( After recording return to: Nikki C. Hatton, Attorney at Law • ! pgcwese Center, Suites 1600-1800 1211 SW Fifth Avenue ^ Portland, Oregon e7201 71 ` - _ _ - j, N. GTATUTORY BARGAIN AND shtf PEED EASTGATU THEATRE, INC., an Oregon corporation, Grantor. ,; 1 conveys to Toy{ MOYER THEATRES, a partnersnip consisting of Thomas 7 P. Moyer And Tnomas P. Moyer, OS Personal Repreuentative of the 1 Estate of Marilyn L. Moyer, +--- Grantee, the following described real property, except tqe — interest therein as expressly reserved and retained as set forth r below, free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth • herein; .1 Sac Exhibit A wriien is attached hereto and by N- this reference incorporated herein. k , Grantor hereby reserves and retains ownership of all II improvement_ presently orating and situated on the above ; I described real property, except for the existing parKing lot improvement, and Grantor ner.0y reserves and retains an easement �.� over t:ne above described teal property for Ute purposes of Access, . • •• upkeep and malnrenance and use for itself and Grantors agents, I,, Invitees, successors and assigns. Such easement to exist so long vi. as the existing improvements retained herein by Grantor remain on • the real property. Provided, however, the easement and rights retained herein by Grantor shall not interfere with the use, - enjoyment and development of the rani property by Grantee: and • ;. provided further, that Grantee shall nave the right to (modify and • i othervisa change oho existing Locations of access to and tro•- the reel property so long as Grantor has reasonable access to end from : ' the isprovumunts which Grantor owns. 1 The true cpnSiderntLon for this conveyance consist_ of or 1 • Includes other property or other value given Or promisv.i. • THIS INSTRUMENT WILL_ NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED .( IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN vioLATION OF ApPLICAac.E LAND U5E LAWS AND �r FJ.SJ.J ._::1,\1. nee proptfs 7RAnSFER ez . � $I49:32 6-/ it i me Pam WrE • • • ); 1 - STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (15707 #2) - I. • • . Y: - .. • * N0V-24-98 14:40 FRO}-FIDELITY CUST SERVICE + 1-021 P.03/06 F-909•�`..,rM?«�- t ' ` ... _ -- - ., M. . • ,.I Gf •• t• I .� Vin_ '�:... r d • .... REGULATIONS. t)PPORE SSGHIED Oa ACcEPTIRc THIS INSTRUMENT, THE '•. PERSON ACQUIRING PEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE •.N ,, : APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIPY APPROVED LEES. • Datad this !? Gay of April, 1969. Grantor: EAST,. ,L-1 TIIRATRE, INC.• an . Cvrpor-tson ay: i ' Title-:--11tCP= - !` STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. county of Multnomah ) i ' • The «oragoing instrgAentfitM nCKA0Wledgad before ma =111 - 1/ ..I}fy of April, 1969, by u ,l,S. Asti(t i ,r - ,._`. of EASTGATE THEATRE' INC., an Oregon I 4,apora .Pn. on behalf ot: the corporation. .7. ,,,Q14l . s::-r U u 1.14••- NOTARY rUSI.IC !OR OREGON • • 1 er . MY COAI011s51On ENpires:_ ti q f L- • • • r 1 • • • 2 - 3TATUTOtiY RARaAih AND SALE D211 (15797 12) t • ,1:1••••:: r,ti.. . - -,40....... .1-....r. • 'ti . .- ... ._.F., .Yr a.. Tti ~., . p. t, • .1A2 - NOV-24-98 14:40 FROM-FIDELITY CUST SERVICE + 1-021 P.04/00 F-909•r -- .. �` • . 1 , .. T._ . . , Y2 - Family Drive In 1 1 I Jrder No. 08071097-W I it r 1 l ' - . - ! I - • II PARCZL. I) - Beginning at the Northeast corner of the George flichatda4n ponatiem ! liLand Clain Number 55, is Section 36, Township 1 South of Range 1 What I { •; of the Willamette Meridian) and running thence South 0 degrees 13' i 4 f Nast 794.46 feet to a point in the centerline mt the Red Rock Road; i running thence North 89 degree's 47' Wait 20.0 feet to a railroad • d spike marking the intersection of the West line of said Rod Rock Road with the Southerly Sine of the West side Pacific Highway 99-W) t I running thence along the Southe-ly line of said highway on the arc of r, , s 1462.4 foot radium curve to the right lths long chord bearing and . "• distance being.South 59 degrees 26' West 244.32 feet1 for a di.atancc , of 241.59 fest to a ones-belf inch iron reed set as a highway right of way marker; thence continuing along the Southerly right of way line ' of said highway South 64 degrees 13' west 329.34 feet to an iron pipe j I at the Northeast corner of that certain 3.00 acre tract of land S J . - conveyed to Jesse S. ones by deed recorded in peed Rook 343, page 59) running thence South 0 degrees 30' West along the Cast line of c r ■aid 3.0D acre tract a distance of 596.3 feet to the true point of i 1 heginning of the hereafter described tract; thence running from ■aid , S point of beginning South 0 deareee 30' Heat Along the tact lint of f ' the above noted 3.00 acre tract of land, a distance of 75.0 feet to II the So thcpet corner thereof in the center of a drainage ditch; • i running thence North 44 degrees 36' Sast 45 feet; running thence �. North 36 degrees 50' Went 53.45 Sect to the true place of beginning. , i P* 2L II; f fie A tract of land in Section 36, Tewnabip 1 South, Range 1 West of the : Willamette Meridian, described as follows' I i Beginning ac the Southeast corner of the Alfred ewicuer tract aff described in Peed nook 78, page 429) and running thence West along I the South line of said Zwiener tract a distance of 272 feet to the i 1 !Southwest corner of that certain tract conveyed to Virgil C. Lebrun. et us, by deed recorded earth 11. 1942, in peed Dock 206, page 401, , sold point being the true point of beginning of the tract herein described' thence Wert along the South line of the said ;wiener ,• tract, said South Line being also the Worth line of that certain ' tract conveyed to Rdvard J. +filet, et us, by deed recorded in Deed 1 ' rook 149, page 462, a distance of 551 feet to the Southwest corner of 1% said &wiener tract) thence North along the West line of said Lwiewer f i tract • distance of 270.56 feet to a point) thence Kass to a point - in the easter line of drainage ditch) thence North 43 degrees 22' . ta st along She cancer of raid drainage ditch 307 feet, thence worth 59 degrees-44' fast along the center of said drainage ditch 492.9 ' fest to a point on the West lane of Red Rock Soed) thence south along i • the Nest line of said road 471.4 feet to a point on the. North line , 1 continued on nest page :I •i • NOV-24-98 14:41 FRO1-FIDELITY CUST SERVICE + T-021 P.05/06 F-906 6)t ' • , order No. 88021897-W of acid Lehman Tract above mentioned; thence Went along the North t line of paid Lehnan Tract 252 feat to the Northwest corner thereof; I thence South alone the Went line of said Lehman Tract 160 feet to the 1 true point of beginni.n;t. I I riuctL III: ( j The following described property; j Re9ioning at the Southeast corner of that certain tract of land owned by Alfred Zwiener in Section 36. Township 1 South, Range 1 r Wcat of the Willamette Meridian, which in described in Decd Book 79, page 428; thence West along the South line of laid Zwiener Tract 272 feet; thence North parallel with the rest line of said Zwiener Tract 160 fret; thence east parallel with the South line of said Zwiener Tract 272 Seel.; thence south to the place of beginning. PARCEL YV; aoginning at the Northeast corner of the George Richardson Donation sand claim situated in Section 36. Township I South, Range 1 Wear at the Willacette Heridian. in Washington county, oregoc; and running thence South 0 degreeo 13' Nest 794.46 feet to a point in the center line of Red Rock Road; thence Korth 69 degrees 47' Neat 20.0 feet to a railroad spike csrking thin intersection of the Westerly sight of way line of ■sad Red Rock Road with the Southerly right of way lino :;I of the preecnt alternate State Sighway 499-W right of way; thence fullowing said State Highway right of way line on a curve to the right having a radius of 1462.40 feet (the long chord of which bears South 59 degrees 26' West 244.32 feet) a distance of 244.59 feat to a one-half inch iron rod set at a ■Late highway right of way monuaent; thence continuing along said right of way line South 64 degrees 13' Went 329.34 feet to an iron pipe, said iron pipe parking the true Point of beginning of this dencription; thence continuing South 64 degrees, 13' Watt 8.71 feet to a one-half inch iron rod met as state highway right of way monument; thence south 54 degrees 01' Wept 250.9 feet to an iron pipet thence leaving said right of way line and �'', +, running Routh 0 degrees 3D' went 602.12 teat to an iron pips; thence South 88 degrees 10' fa nt•71.18 fret to an iron pipe; thence Korth 44 tl degree. 16' Rost 202.68 feat along the canter line of a drainage ditch to an iron pipe; thence north D degrees 30' gait 611.30 fees to the true point of beginning of this doacription. �'I L Ct6' ING that portion thereof contained in Contract to purchase ' to Wilbur L. Thomas and Ardus M. Thomas, by instrument recorded in Deed Book 396, poet 109, described se follow■r Lt. tract of land in the County of Washington. State of Oregon, described as ioilawt: ; I Bcgiania0 at the Northeast corner of the Georg.: Richardson Donation I ; ' Land Claim 3n Section 36, Township 1 South of Range 1 Weat of the Willamette Werldian; thence south 0 degrees 13' Nast 794.46 feet to s- point in the center line of Red Rock Road; thence North 89 degrees 47' I;tut 20.0 feet to n railroad spike marking the Intersection of ■ continued on nest page •r 7 _ - - _ — NOV-24-08 14:41 FROM-FIDELITY CUST SERVICE + T-021 P.08/08 F-909 1 #, t 1I Q i t • g:, , 'f order No. 88021897-K i I the Westerly right of way line of said Red Rock Pond with the 6outharly right of way lint of the present alternate state Highway f Number 99-34 right of way line: thence following said State Highway right of way Tina on a curve to the right having a radius of 1462.4D i i feet (the on chord of which bears South 59 degrees 26' West 244.32 fcetl a distant. of 244.59 feet to an inch iron rod Hat as a State t• sighway right of way line monument; thence continuing along amid right of way line South 64 degrees 13' Went 329,34 feet to an iron pion; thcnee continuing South 64 degree. 13' West 8.71 feet to an f iron rod sat as a State highway right of .ay monument; thence South 54 degrees 01' Nast 250.93 feet to an iron I 9 pipe marking the true I I point of beginning of the tract to ba described; thence leaving said i f tight of way line and running South 0 degrees 30' Reim 395.8 feat to en iron sod; thence South 89 degrees 30' East 144.0 feet; t`.an. c 1 North 1 degrees 40' East 287.9 "eat; thence North 1 degrees 57'30• ' West 100.0 feats thence North 15 degrees 34' Wast 53.0 feet; thence ' North 43 degrees 43' West 43.2 feet to an iron red set vn the j aforementioned State Righkay right of way line; thence South 54 I: degree. 01' Welt 125.0 feat to the true point of beginning. 11 EXCEPTING TNERCF&OM the above tour parcels, 1 those portions conveyed to the public and/or the City of Tigard by . Deeds recorded June 23, .978 as Fee Na. 78-25457, August 31, 1957, _ Fee No. 67044639 and August 31, 1987, Fee no. 57044641, ( I ii 'I ''I 1.1 t7 ATE OF OfiEGON } ,,I SS Cower),a)a.nrlptm I.lamarl LOW.O.CCIO,V I name;: aL .,1e Taaa.af trio accord.w Con- .nonc.0 N.sera owel o-.Po NNW,WARY,nw i;' p•. .w.M(Q...AMJ a ...w19 wit rl•ar.u0 .,o,.eaaa n oodk a wmoo•a sna cosy r- 000aa W Moon,0.oc. a • • • i Doc : .9019393 . Rect; 4451 1663.00 IS/01/I999 e7:54:16PM • • r ' 1 • 7' _ .. •. 11/24/98 TUE 13:26 FAX 1 503 274 5472 CUSTOMER SERVICE k. ;t ti; 007■ .. reel , :. 1 SA. 16th 3 `'•i WAPkANTY DEED .`I,. • 4. HENRY NETZENTXNE, widower of ELLEN L. METZENTINE, a,:'- deceased, hereinafter called grantor', convey to SAMUEL P. , .. STEYART, and individed two-eighths interest, SAMUEL B. STEWART, • 1.?- an individod three-eighths interest, and PIIYLLtS T. STP.WART, e': an lndivldod three-eighths interest, as tenants in ..Ammon, all . .. . that real property situated in Washington County. State of p • - Orc)on, described ass L NL• .• •T. }! Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Gen. Richardson • ':' Donation Land Claim No. 55 situated in Section ]6, t• Township 1 South, Range 1 wort, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and running thence South ' • 00°13' West 794.46 feet to a point in the- center of ' '" S. W. 72nd Avenue (County-Road No. 245) thence North. • 09°47' Weet 20.00 foot to thn HarihillIt Corner of that tract described in deed to Henry Metzentino, .et uk Z .1 recorded April 12, 1948, in book 284, Page 379, Nash.ngton •t' County deed records, said point Laing on the Southeasterly . w right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway and being the . ' aI �7 tt'Vu point of hnsIinntn' or the hvte+(n deaeiibed prOpertyi • 4• h ,� thence continuing Southwesterly on said right-of-way line c N on a curve to the right, having a -radius of 1462.40 feet 0 v (the lung chord .of which .bcare South 59°26' West 244.32 U ZI .." • feet) 244,59 feet to an icon pipe; thence continuing . . . . V "1 along sold right-of-way :(outh G4c'13' Wcot 09,34 foot to v• . '4'4 an iron pipe: thence South 11°28'40" East 300.0 feet to ■ an iron pipe; thence South 82°44'10" West 280.0 feet to f �. ` an iron pip.: on the East line of tract described as @ C y Parcel IV in Memorandum of Assignment recorded October 12, - 1966 in Hook 618, Page 161, Records of Washington County; s ' thence South 0°30' West along said East line 311.30 feet b 4 to the most Mo=therly corner of tract described as Parcel 1 't in said. Memorandum.of Assignment; thence South 36050' • r e M . East 53.45 feet to the most Easterly corner of said 1- u Parcel I, being a pointer, the Northwesterly line of. tract 1 ' C 12 described us Parcel. II in said Memorandum of Assignment; ▪ 1. thence North 44 016' East along said Northwesterly line II! ; 59.32 foot to an angle point thereon; thence North 61°31' East, along said Northwesterly line 498.59 font to a point .. Yen the West lino of S. W. 72nd Avenue: thence Notth O°13" East along said West line 566.53 feet to the true point . of beginning. . • ,aid covenant that grantor is the owner of the above described ' property free of all encumbrances, and will warrant.and "defend . the same against all persons who may lawfully claim the same. ]J Lo • • ' - . D..ted this C_'day of .J !-O . _, 1977. -`• 4 S late of Oregon , L -y t ,enty of it A I,i...•t't _ •' ru.elan...i.� :., . t4�..4*....NI.NI. ... G - soots TuoNsmot OI,!•rr ee a•�a.i tMe+w• , .. + �fiir rs. 1 , 1977. .• {m( . - �__n..er _ 1 Po enally appeared the above-name}_., ,..:,...,'.1='' i :WA acknOwledeed the- foregoing Instrument to he r.•1 voluntary et. Before mot • . . '' • - Notary t'"blic for Oregon _ r-• • "Official Seal fs.,,.., . " 1 4v l'emmirsion hxpira^a: fw • ' n114S •,,,15 t, 7.M is� . i i-. • i 11/24/98 TUE 13:27 FAX 1 503 274 5472 CUSTOMER SERVICE i 9 BARGAIN AND SALE D® 93109019 • ' PHYLI.IS STEWART,Granter,for the consideration hereinafter sated,does hereby grant. 7� bargain, trop rind convey unto PHYLLIS STEWART,DONATA STEWART AND NATHAN 1 1 •••• COHEN,CO-TRUSTEES OP THE STEWART TR13ST ESTABLISHED UNDER THE LAST • . `.; WILL AND TESTAMENT OP SAMUEL B.STEWART DATED OCTOBER 7.1984,Grantee. ' Os,. the following detcribed red property,dtuued in the County of Washington,State of Oregon: r An undivided three-eighths(3/8)interest,as tenant in common,in the following • described real property: A parcel of land beginning it the northeast corner of the George Richardson tt�" , _ Donation Land Cairn No. 55,situated in Section 36,Township 1 South, Range w I West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon: and running • thence South 00° 13'West 794,46 feet to a point in the center line of Southwest f • 72nd Avenue (County Road 245): thence North 89° 47' West 20.00 feet to the ". northeast corner of the Henry Metzentine property as described in Deed Book 418, �„ • Page 400, Washington County Deed Records, and which corner is on the southeasterly right of way line of Southwest Pacific Highway; thence continuing • • _ Southwesterly on said right of way line on a curve to the.'lght. having s radius of 1462.40 feet,(the long chord of which bears South 59°26'West 244.32 feet) 24439 feet to a 3/4 inch iron rod; thence continuing along said right of way, South 64° 13' West 229.34 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at the true place of ' beginning o: the tract herein described; thence South 8° 10'East 74.31 feet to an ! iron pipe;thence South 0°30'West 71 feet to an iron rod;thence South 64° 13' •. West 112.43 fei.t to an iron rod thence South 0°30'West 75 feet to an iron pipe; • thence North 82°44' 10"East 280 feet to an iron pipe;thence North 11°28'40" West 300 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 64° 13' West 140 feet to the true • • point of beginning. Grantor makes this transfer in connection with a duly approved lot line adjustment by ' ' ...i which the boundaries of the real property described above(shown as Tax Lot 2602 on the maps • of the Washington County Assessor) and of the real property shown on the maps of the , ; Washington County Assessor as Tax Lot 2600 are being adjusted. (The adjusted boundaries of the subject lots are as described on Survey No. 23,164, Washington County Survey Records.) r. •• It is the Grantor's intent by this transfer to have all of the real property within the adjusted boundaries of the subject lots held as follows: an undivided five-eighths (5/8)interest held by Grantor and an undivided three-eighths(3/8) interest held by Grantee. The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars,is$0. However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. • In construing this deed and where the context so requires,the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to i , corporations and to individuals. ' . 'a IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument this `0 day of December, 1993. a THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN • • • AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: 'i I.Kenneth Davis . 851 SW Sixth Avenue.Suite L500 Portland, Oregon 97204 . UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED,ALL TAX STATE., MENT'S SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Phyllis T.Stewart !i 621 S.W.Englewood Drive • • Lake Oswego,Oregon 97034 r'• . 1-BARGAIN AND SALE DEED ttw\,rrr-1,017) „ 1: 11/24/98 TUE 13:28 FAX 1 503 274 5472 CUSTOMER SERVICE II �.: ti _ _ j LAWS AIQD. +>:•l.•.y • i LATt�O��G OR ACCEPTING :,,r_ ;. i r ERSON ACQUIP.ING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY DSHo� • IPPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY A PLANNING DE A MENT ITS AGAINST A PPAOVED USES AND TO DETERMINE } 1;ARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. • yam., y i Phyllis•tewart ,, !MATE OF OREC3ON ) a.Ac.A+nK )115• . County ccf JAukr.em eh ) The foregoing instrument Was acknowledged before Lne ells ifdi day of December, 1993, . . by Phyllis Stewart 1,1 Oh i :� OlHCiA1SEAL L.+. S Ho A IA.Wi La csoWR armor+ NOTARY PUBLI~ OREGON r \'�J COMMt5310N NO 015196 My Commission Expires: pry COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY S.1994 i • • :• 1! e.. • • .•a STATE OF OREGON t • 'rr.• County of Weehington 88 /T . tt I,Jerry 11:17;aeo'R Dlyd r of Asseea- ment and 3Mxation and Ex•OMkJo County • Clerk for arkd county, herebypartlty that ',k• • and withrilnenvmenll f wNgng wee received e recdrded.In bOOX-Of remits; 01 amid • county. :�' 1..• •y -.. Jerry R Henson,Dkector 01 ' - _ •.Iweaambr'and hat on.Ez- :r; . Offttao C�OUMy Clerk ∎ Doc : 93109019 • Rect: 113983 38.00 s • • 12/28/1993 11:11:37AM ' ' ' I ' . 2•BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 4e1m\rTT1-4.e111 4.. 11/24/98 TUE13:25 FAX 1 503 274 5472 CUSTOMER SERVICE 12006 Fidelity-National Title Company ee The Closing Company Prepared For: Prepared By.VALERIE THOMAS Information Services Department 401 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97204 Phone:(503)227-LIST(5478) Fax:(503)274-5472 Internet: http://wwwinto.com OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Stewart Phyllis T Ref Parcel Number : 1S136DB 02600 CoOwner :Stewart Trast T:01S R:0I W 5:36 Q:251 Site Address : 11201 SW 72nd Ave Tigard 97223 Parcel Number :R0285202 Mail Address :621 Englewood Dr Lake Oswego Or 97034 Map Number Telephone :Owner: Tenant: County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred Loan Amount . Document# : 11480135 Lender • Sale Price Loan Type Deed Type Interest Rate . %Owned Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid :655 G3 Land :$822,990 Census :pact:307.00 Block: l Structure • Subdivision/Plat Other Neighborhood Cd :ZPHY Total :$822,990 Land Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial "S Improved . Legal :ACRES 3.47 97-98 Taxes :$9,803.56 Exempt Amount : • Exempt Type . Class Code Levy Code :02381 Millage Rate :15.2720 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS • Bedrooms Lot Acres :3.47 Year Built • Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 151,153 E„(JYearBlt Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfm SgFI : Foundation . Appliances Bsm Low SqFt . Roof Shape . Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matt Hood Fan 1st Fir SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Flr SqFt : Paving Mall . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish • Deck SqFt This tit information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimata Insureds. indiscriminate use only bar refiting Intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. 11/24/98 TUE 13:26 FAX 1 503 274 5472 CUSTOMER SERVICE al on //'----1-li\\\\!!!!!!/1 Fidelity National Title Company The Closing Company Prepared For: Prepared By:VALERIE THOMAS Information Services Department 401 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97204 Phone: (503)227-LIST(5478) Fax: (503)274-5472 Internet: http://www,fnto.com OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Stew art Phyllis Et Al Ref Parcel Number : 1 S136DB 02602 CoOwner : Stewart Donata 7:015 R:OIW S: 36 Q: 251 Site Address : 11.596 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard 97223 Parcel Number :R0285220 Mail Address :621 Englewood Dr Lake Oswego Or 97034 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: 503-639-1106 County :Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 12/2 8/93 Loan Amount . Document II : 109119 Lender . Sale Price Loan Type . Deed Type Interest Rate . %Owned :38 Vesting Type . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION '1 ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page&Grid 655 G3 Land : $255,830 Census . Tract:307.00 Block: 1 Structure :$134,800 Subdivision/Plat Other . Neighborhood Cd ZPHY Total :$390,630 Land Use 2012 Com,Improved %Improved :35 Legal :ACRES.79 97-98 Taxes :$4,653.25 . Exempt Amount : Exempt Type Class Code :T35 Levy Code :02381 Millage Rate : 15.2720 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms Lot Acres : .79 Year Built • Bathrooms Lot SqFt :34,412 EfJYearBlt .• Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation : Appliances Bsm Low SqFt : Roof Shape Dishwasher : Bldg SqFt Roof Marl . Hood Fan 1st Fir SqFt InteriorMat . Deck Upper Fir SqFt : Paving Mat! . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish . Deck SqFt . This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with be guidelines approved by the State of Oregon insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate Insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. Exle) ,ibli- 8 miar December 11 , 1998 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Eastgate Theater, Inc. Attention: Tim Reed 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97205 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/SDR 98-0025 Dear Mr. Reed: This letter is in response to the recent application that has been made to add six (6) screens to the existing 11 screen theater. This application has been considered to be incomplete pending submittal of the following additional information and/or plan revisions: 1. Certain plan sheets do not match other plan sheets. The Conceptual Site Plan and Site Plan show a proposed driveway system being extended to the westerly property line. The Landscape Plan, Grading/Erosion Control Plan and Composite Utility Plan do not show this extension. We recommend that this extension be shown on each plan sheet; 2. Provide 24 sets of preliminary sizing calculations for the proposed water quality facilities; 3. Provide 24 sets of an arborist report and mitigation plan for trees over 12 inches in diameter that are proposed to be removed; and 4. Provide 24 sets of an addendum to the applicant's narrative and/or the plan sheets that address if a parking lot driveway connection between the adjoining McDonald's site and the subject property is or is not possible. During the Preapplication Conferences we had discussed that if the Tri-County Shopping Center does not go forward with construction at this time, that adequate transportation facilities were not available at the SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue intersection. This existing problem has been confirmed by the traffic study submitted for this project. Because an adequate level of service is presently not available and improvements to the SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street intersection are not listed in the Capital Improvement Program funding prioritization, the City will have to recommend denial of the proposed theater expansion. This project is untimely until such time as the needed improvements have been made. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (507)A O-x171 rnn (Fnrn f,84-2772 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 8 The private street system that has been shown on some of the proposed plan sheets has not been designed to be in an alignment that would match SW Atlanta Street. For this reason, the proposed project design does not appear to adequately address planned street connectivity requirements in this area. My last day with the City is today, therefore, this project has been reassigned to Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner. Please feel free to contact her concerning this information at (503) 639-4171 x407. Sincerely, 7ijit4 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP is\cu rpin\markrll etters\actI I I.doc c: SDR 98-0025 Land use file Michael Robinson Bill Monahan Jim Hendryx Dick Bewersdorff 12/11/98 Tim Reed, Eastgate Theater Ltr. Page 2 of 2 Re: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal for SDR 98-0025/Act Ill Theaters Eh1b , f 9 Preliminary Water Quality Calculation: Project: Regal Cinemas, Inc.—Tigard Cinema Project No.: 04.1609.0502 Date: January 5, 1999 Engineer: B. Berry,P.E. Given: 1. W.Q. facility per USA 3.11.5 c.4)-Design Storm of 0.36" in 4hrs 2. New Impervious Area: North Parking Area Expansion= 52,500 SF(1.2 Acres) 72°d Avenue Widening/Sidewalk= 28,100 SF(0.66 Acres) Total New Impervious 80,600 SF(1.85 Acres) 3. The new building expansion will be a 1:1 exchange for existing impervious area and will not be treated. Find: W.Q. Flow and preliminary sizing of Stormwater Management Compost Stormwater Filter (CSF). Solution: Q=CIA =0.95(0.36"/4hr)(1.85 AC) =0.16 cfs No. of cartridges=0.16 cfs x 449/15=4.7 therefore use 5 CSF model 6 x 8 (footprint=7'x9') Stormwater Management Compost Storm Filter: The compost media is contained in a series of radial flow filter cartridges which have a seven inch thick layer of the media through which stormwater passes. Sediments are filtered out on both the surface of the filter and the surfaces of granules throughout the media matrix. The media also acts as a chemical filter to remove dissolved ionic pollutants such as heavy metals, including lead, copper,and zinc. The compost filters remove a minimum of 50%of phosphorous. According to the Unified Sewerage Agency, 15% of phosphorous is removed with the use of sumped catch basins and Manholes. The total phosphorous removal for this site will be a minimum of 65%. Operation and maintenance shall conform to the Stormwater Management "Operation and Maintenance Guidelines"manual. 1:\PROJEC \I 6090502\WORD\WQDESIGN.IOC EXHIBIT 9 Exhibil- to PACIFIC 8405 S.W.Nimbus Avenue Beaverton,OR 97008-7120 January 6, 1999 Mr.Allan Norris Thompson Viavoda Architects 1010 Southwest 11th Avenue Portland,Oregon 97205 Re: Tigard Cinemas — Response to Stoel Rives Letter of 12/30/98 Dear Allan: This letter is formal response to the items in the above mentioned letter identified for WHP clarification. Atlanta Street Location We have only shown how the parking area has been modified for the project on our drawings.The TVA conceptual site plan shows the shading for the Atlanta connectivity. In our previous exhibit and layout of Atlanta,we showed a connection at the Costco entrance on the west and provided two design speed curves to get it in line with the cinema.The easterly connection/orientation attempted to match existing Atlanta to thceast which did not align with our current access point. As we discussed,I don't see a problem hatching the drive aisle as modified for the project as the connectivity provided by our project since it does not currently exist on either the east or west. Parking Count Per my previous e-mail, I had the number of stalls in the Tri-Met lot field verified and the total existing stall count is 208. Tree Survey There will be one tree removed in the SE corner of the site that is larger than 12"diameter to allow the required widening of 72nd Avenue. Water Quality I have prepared the attached water quality calculations for the project. I have attached revised civil and landscape plans that are consistent, sheet to sheet. I believe this covers the items you requested to be completed for the re-submittal.If you have any questions,please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, W&H PACIFIC,INC. / B ..�.Berry,P.E. Project Manager ends(2) ITROJFC 160;0502 MORD010699adx EXHIBIT 10 (503) 626-0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture TVA TIGARD CINEMAS 1 SEAT, PARKING COUNT m 1/7/99 I- 1, THEATRE EXIST. SEATS REVISED AND CHG TO RISER a NO. NEW SEATS (DEDUCTED) 1 611 516 1 95 2 340 277 63 3 340 277 63 0 cn 4 252 196 j 56 F. 5 252 196 56 6 150 128 22 > 7 150 128 22 - 8 172 146 26 9 150 128 22 5. c 10 150 128 22 0 11 172 146 26 12 114 °i 13 114 14 166 i, 15 114 16 114 1 17 166 TOTAL 2739 3054 *! 473 0 W SEATING: 1 EXISTING SEATING: 2739 1 SEATS LOST: -473 1 it TOTAL EXISTING LEFT: 2266 § NEW THEATER SEATS: 788 GRAND TOTAL SEATS: 3054 * SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION PER SEATING MANUFACTURER Principals Robert L.Thompson,EAU Edward Vaivoda Jr.,AlA David P.Gellos,MA Kurt K.Schultz,AIA Associates James P.Bocci Marc A.Lr' " — i J.Norris EXHIBIT 11 TVA TIGARD CINEMAS SEAT, PARKING COUNT 1/7/99 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES REVISED EXIST'G TTL 2,266: (1 to 4) 567 ADD NEW TOTAL OF 788: (1 to 3) 263 TOTAL REQUIRED: 830 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES EXISTING TOTAL SPACES: 829 SPACES REMOVED FOR BLDG. EXPANSION -118 SPACES REMOVED AT SETBACK -40 REVISED EXISTING PARKING SPACES: 671 NEW PARKING SPACES: 165 TOTAL 836 PARKING WITH STREET CONNECTIVITY ON SITE EXISTING TOTAL SPACES: 836 SPACES IN STREET CONNECTIVITY REMOVED -104 TOTAL SPACES REMAINING 732 TOTAL SPACES IN TRI-MET PARKING: 208 TOTAL COMBINED SPACES: 940 07/07/98 14:30 'B`1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC Q002 After Recording Return To: Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be Dean Phillips sent to: Tri-Met - 710 NE Holladay Street No Change Portland, Oregon 97232 EASEMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: THE TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON ("Tri-Met") EASTGATE THEATRE, INC_ ("Act III") • TOM MOYER THEATRES, a partnership ("Owner") RECITALS WHEREAS, Tri-Met owns a parcel of real property described hereinbelow; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of Tri-Met to construct a parking lot an Tri-Met's property to provide a Park & Ride Lot for Tri-Metes patrons and customers using the bus pullout located on Highway 99 immediately north of the proposed parking lot; and WHEREAS, Tri.-Met, Owner and Act III desire to provide for certain easements, maintenance, and certain other rights and responsibilities with respect to the Tri-Met Park & Ride Lot. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein and the terms and conditions set forth hereinafter,. the parties agree as follows: A_ Properties. The parties (singly, a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties") understand and agree that: 1. Tri-Met is the owner of certain vacant land which will serve as the site of a Park & Ride facility described as Parcel 1 in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and shown on the drawing marked Exhibit B, attached hereto ("Parcel 1") ; and 2. Owner is the owner of a private road to the west of Parcel 1 described as Parcel 2 in Exhibit A and shown on drawing marked Exhibit B, both attached hereto ("Parcel 2") ; Act III, as tenant, a d Owner, as landlord, have entered into a lease dated t >- , 19 (the "Lease") , covering among other premises, Pa cel 2. EXHIBIT 12 1 - RECIPROCAL-USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (SW1/00925/87,65/MAN/601017.3) 07/07/98 14:30 2T1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC a 003 B. Grant of Easements. 1- Tri-Met's Grant. Tri-Met does hereby grant and convey to Owner and Act III, subject to the terms hereof, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, a nonexclusive easement to use Parcel 1 for parking purposes, such parking privileges to be available to Act III and Owner and their respective tenants, subtenants, patrons, customers, employees, agents, invitees, and representatives after 5: 00 p.m. on weekdays and during all hours on weekends in conjunction with the use of the cinema of Act III operated on adjacent property-(the "Cinema") . 2 . Act III's Grant. Act III and Owner do hereby grant and convey, subject to the terms hereof, to Tri-Met, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, a nonexclusive easement on and over Parcel 2 for the purpose of allowing surface- ingress and ' egress of vehicular and pedestrian traffic (excluding buses and trucks other than light pickup trucks) by Tri-Met, Tri-Net's patrons, customers, employees, agents, invitees, and representatives to make use of Parcel 1 as a Park & Ride facility. 3 . Construction Rights and Obligations of Tri-Met. Tri-Met will construct the parking lot, eastern sidewalk and related landscape improvements and lighting pursuant to the plans and specifications attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference. Portions of the sidewalk and landscaping are situated on Parcel 2. Such construction shall be completed by Tri-Met on or before December 1, 1995, at the sole cost and expense of Tri-Met, including procurement of all necessary land use and other permits required by the City of Tigard with respect to the design of the project, site preparations, bidding and ,construction. During the course of construction, Tri-Met shall enjoy a temporary construction easement for ingress and egress over Parcel 2 for purposes of completing the construction and obtaining access to Parcel 1. Such temporary construction easement shall terminate and be of no further force or effect upon completion of construction. During the course of construction, Tri-Met shall use its best efforts to avoid hindering access to the Cinema via Parcel 2 and such access shall never be totally obstructed. 4 . Term_ The Easements granted under paragraphs 1. and 2. are not perpetual and shall expire on the later to occur of: (i) April 30, 2014, or (ii) as and when the Cinema permanently ceases operation on the property of Owner situated south of Parcel 1 (the "cinema Property") ; such termination shall be automatic and self-executing without the necessity of any reentry by Owner or Act III. If, as and when the Cinema is no longer operated on the Cinema Property, Owner may file an affidavit to that effect in the Official Records of Washington County, Oregon, to evidence termination of such easements if such cessation of Cinema operations occurs after April 30, 2014 . • 2 - RECIPROCAL-USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (SVu1/00925/874o5/HAH/6o1017.3) 07/07/98 14:11 $1 503 241 1999 TiT DEV CO INC al 004 C. Limitation of Use. Except as specifically authorized by this Agreement, no other use may be made of any easement area covered by this Agreement (the "Easement Area") without the prior written approval of the other Parties. No use may be made of, on, or from the Easement Area relating to the handling, storage, disposal, transportation, or discharge of Hazardous Substances as defined below in this Agreement. Under no circumstances shall any use be made of, or conduct occur on, the Easement Area which would cause the Easement Area, or any part thereof, to be deemed a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility requiring a permit, interim status, or any other special - authorization under any Environmental Law, as defined below in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall preclude Owner or Act III, their successors, assigns, or tenants, from transporting over the Easement Area materials and substances -used in the ordinary course of any business conducted on the Cinema Property provided such materials and substances, including Hazardous Substances, if any, are used, stored, and • transported in accordance with applicable state and Federal laws, rules, and regulations. D. Other Uses. Each Party, for itself and for its respective successors, assigns, tenants, customers, patrons, employees, agents, invitees, and representatives, reserves the right to use and enjoy the portion of the Easement Area owned or leased by it for any purpose except to the extent such use materially conflicts with the uses permitted by this Agreement. owner and Act III expressly reserve unto themselves, and their successors and assigns, the right to grant to others the right to use Parcel 1 for purposes of ingress and egress, the supply of utilities or other services or for any other purpose so long as the grant does not materially interfere with the easement rights granted to Tri-Met hereunder. ' E. Improvements. No installations, improvements, modifications, or alterations (collectively "Improvements") shall be performed, constructed on, or made to the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the Party who owns or leases the portion of the Easement Area subject to the proposed work. Unless otherwise agreed, any Party which has been given consent to make such Improvements shall restore the surface of the Easement Area to its condition and size prior to such installation, as well as replace, as applicable, any sidewalks, pavement, curbs, driveways, signs, irrigation systems, or other improvements affected by the Improvements, subject only to those changes agreeable to the Parties. Any Party making Improvements to the Easement Area shall perform any work in the Easement Area in a good and workmanlike manner and in a manner which minimizes interruption or disruption to the operations of the other parties. F. Maintenance. The Parties agree that Tri-Met shall pay all maintenance expenses for Parcel 1, including the eastern sidewalk and Tri.-Met's parking facility regardless of whether those Improvements lie within Parcel 1 or Parcel 2, and Owner or 3 - RECIPROCAL-USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (SVIJ1/00925/87465/MAM/601017.3) 07/07/98 14:32 $1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC ql 005 • Act III, as the case may be, shall bear maintenance expenses for all other areas of Parcel 2 . The Parties agree that the properties shall be maintained in a condition substantially equivalent to the condition existing upon completion of construction of the initial improvements. Each Party shall be responsible for maintaining an insurance policy or self-insurance coverage for all-risk casualties relating to the damage or destruction of the pavement or other improvements in the Easement Area. In the event of -damage or destruction of the pavement or other improvements in the Easement Area covered by such insurance policy- or self-insurance coverage, the proceeds of such coverage shall be applied to restore the Easement Area. So long as their respective insurers so permit, the Parties hereby mutually waive their respective rights of recovery against each other for any insured loss. The Parties agree that _any repair or maintenance shall be undertaken in a manner so as to minimize disruption of traffic in the Easement Area and shall not be undertaken in a manner that will unreasonably deny access or use of the Easement Area. Prior to commencement of repair or maintenance work that may temporarily interfere with access, the Party undertaking the work shall give reasonable prior written notice of the work and the scheduling of the work to the other Parties. In the event of any dispute arising out of the repair and/or maintenance of the Easement Area or the payment of the costs of such work, the Parties agree to submit such dispute to arbitration pursuant to paragraph L. hereinbelow. Each Party shall be solely responsible for the repair of any damage to the Easement Area caused by such Party or such Party's agents, employees, invitees or tenants. G. Indemnities. 1. Each Party shall compensate the other Parties for any and all damages to the other Parties' property or improvements caused by the construction, maintenance, repair, replacement, removal of installations, or other activities undertaken by such Party, or its employees, representatives, agents, or contractors, in the Easement Area. 2 . Each Party (the "Indemnifying Party") shall fully indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the other Parties, their respective board members, officers, directors, and employees from and against all claims and actions and all costs, expenses, and liabilities, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, incurred in connection with all claims, including any action or proceeding brought thereon arising from or as a result of death or injury to any person, or loss or damage to any property, resulting from any negligent act or omission of the Indemnifying Party in connection with its use of the Easement Area, including, but not limited to, the Indemnifying Party's installation, operation, or maintenance of the Easement Area, excepting ' therefrom any claims resulting from the intentional or .negligent act, fault, or omission of the indemnitee. 3 . In addition to the indemnity provided in the paragraph above, each Party (an "Indemnifying Party") agrees to 4 - RECIPROCAL-USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (Stv1/009Z5/87465/MAM/601017.3) 07/07/98 14:33 %21 503 241 1999 TNT DEV CO INC 006 indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the other Parties (collectively "Indemnified Party") from and against all costs incurred by the Indemnified Party under any state or Federal environmental laws (as defined below) , which costs arise out of, or are in connection with use, generation, treatment, handling, storage, discharge, transportation, or disposal of hazardous substances (as defined below) by the Indemnifying Party. Promptly upon written notice from any governmental entity regarding any hazardous substance contamination to the Easement Area, the Indemnifying Party shall reasonably cooperate with the governmental entity in responding to the notice and shall engage in such remediation as may be required by the governmental entity with respect to all hazardous substances which are in or on the Easement Area as a result of the acts or omissions of the Indemnifying Party, whether in existence prior to the commencement date of this Agreement or thereafter, and shall restore the Indemnified Party or Parties property or the Easemen-t Area to clean, safe, good, and serviceable condition. Any such clean-up shall be in conformance with all applicable governmental rules and regulations. Any costs reasonably incurred by or assessed against the Indemnified Party shall be paid by the Indemnifying Party promptly after the Indemnified Party incurs the obligation to pay such amounts or determines that an assessment is duly owing and so notifies the Indemnifying Party. The .Indemnifying Party shall, at its sole expense, defend any and all actions, suits, and proceedings relating to matters covered by the indemnities set forth in this Agreement which may be brought against the Indemnified Party or in which the Indemnified Party may be impleaded and shall satisfy, pay, and discharge any and all judgments, settlements, orders, and decrees that may be obtained or entered against the Indemnified Party or Parties in any such action or proceeding. H. Appurtenant Easement. The Parties agree that the . - easements created hereunder for the benefit of Tri-Met are appurtenant to the lands of Tri-Met included in or adjoining the Easement Area and shall run with title to such lands so long as the land owned by Tri-Met is used as a Park & Ride facility. The Parties agree that the easements created hereunder for the benefit of Act III and Owner are appurtenant to the lands of Owner included in or adjoining the Easement Area and shall run with title to such lands so long as the land owned by Owner is used for operation of a cinema. I. Notices . If to Tri--Met: Technical Services Division Kim Knox, Project Coordinator 710 N.E. Holladay Street Portland, Oregon 97232 5 - RECIPROCAL--USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT Csw1/00925/87'65/HAH/601o17.3) 07/07/98 14:33 $1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC RI 007 If to Act III: Tim Reed, Vice President Act III Theatres 919 S.W. Taylor Portland, OR 97205 If to Owner: J. Existing Encumbrances. The easements granted herein are subject to all easements, conditions, encumbrances, liens and restrictions of record as of the date of recording of this Agreement. K_ Default and Remedies. In the event any Party shall fail to perform any covenant or condition on its part to be _ performed under this Agreement, and shall fail to cure the same within ten days of receipt of written notice thereof by the nondefaulting Party, then such Party shall be in default of this Agreement and the nondefaulting parties may commence appropriate proceedings pursuant to paragraph L. below in order to obtain such legal or equitable remedies as may be available under Oregon law, excluding, however, termination of the easements created herein, it being the Parties' intent that the easements are terminable only upon expiration of the term set forth herein. L. Arbitration. Any dispute between the Parties arising out of this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by binding arbitration in Multnomah County, Oregon, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitration shall be before a single arbitrator. The cost of the arbitration shall be shared equally; provided, however, that the arbitrator may award costs and fees to the prevailing Party. The arbitration shall be held within 60 days of selection of the arbitrator unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties_ M. Attorneys' Fees. If any Party to this Agreement breaches any term of this Agreement, then the other Party shall be entitled to recover all expenses of whatever form or nature, costs, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred to enforce the terms of this Agreement, whether or not suit is filed, including 6 - RECIPROCAL-USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (SI.v1/00425/87465/MAPS/601017.3) 07/07/98 14:34 '8'1 503 241 1999 TNT DEV CO INC Ia008 such costs or fees as may be awarded in arbitration or by a court at trial or on appeal. THIS AGREEMENT is executed this day of 1995. THE TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON By: -� Name: Jcan d Gel_lve+r _ Title: G�ccurwE. Drreclar, EASTGATE THEATRE, INC. By: s Name: _ ___ - Title:/ - TOM MOYER THEATRES By: fi� Name: "� � {� aY�2 Title: STATE OF OREGON ) ) sS. . County of rlultnomah ) This instrument was acknowledged before zne this 17th day of Jul.& , 1995, by n nty"I4.e„ , as Ex cn VP nirc rter of The Tri-Coutiopolitan Transportation District of Oregon, an Oregon municio al corporation on behalf of the Ngpncy . C.)-1.13,1k.A.,- 'Nfl-i-2-1 !"! OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE TRilDO NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON IL my NOTARY PIRESJUN E02.1 My Commission Expires: �/-2148 COMMIS8ICN Na 03055 my GOMMI9$f0►r EXPIRES JUNE 0y,�g98 7 - RECIPROCAL-USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT [suJt/00925/87465/MAM/601017.3) 07/07/98 14:34 V1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC lJ009 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of ild kat/ ) 114) This ' inst 'meet was acknowledg-d •ef a me this 1 ) day of u , 1995, by . 11, , as of Eastgate Theatre, Inc. , an •re-o • corporation, on •ehalf of the corporatio . , _ jet^ •;,:r„- :b JACKIE WiL.Y.ES T. NOTARY?LAIC CP_GQN COMMISSION NO. 025828 NOTARY P. BLIC FOR OREGON PAY COMMISSION EXPiRESAUG,os,1997 My Commission Expires: "D ,� 9 • STATE OF -G ) ss. ' County of ..1&0_,A7,) ) his instrument was acknow edged re me this. }l day of , 1995, by�.�- '.<.� � .�-f� � as a partnet' of m Moyer Theatres, an Oregon partnersh , on behalf of the partnership. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: g-/ -f.--7 8 - RECIPROCAL-USE EASEMENT AGREEMENT (suu1/00925/87465/MAN/601017.3) 07/07/98 14:34 121 503 241 1999 TMT DE CO INC a010 &'G�ZSZF A" SiATEE FILE 616900.1. Page 1 of 2 ay 24. 1993 • PART OF rzr x0. 80-41904 • A parcel at land located is the southeast 1/4 of S.atien 36, T. 1. 2 _ , R. 1 f7. . }].H. , within the c. Richardson D.L.C. Ito, S3 Washington County, Oregon. Said parcel of land being a pert of . • that certain tract of land conveyod to Phyllis Stewart an Hove-.�ar 18, 1920, and recorded in Fee Ha, 80-41904, Washington County Deed follcc�s . Said parcel bei:: daaeribed by ©etos and bounds ai Baginnioq at a 3/4-inch iron pipe st the most southuasterlr corner of said Fee Ho. 80_i190 4; thence along the' westerly line of acid Fee Ho. , N. 01' 56' 51" .E. a distant* of 74.91 feet to a 5/8-inch i=on rod with yel-low plastic cap stamped XartPe A.ssodiates, 2te." at canner of said F•. Ha. . the most northerly aat;.thuoat fay er- X. 5 d . : thence along a northerly line of said J5 0• R. a distance of 67.40 feet; thenct along a line through said Eta Mo. S. 8H' 03 ' 09" L. a distance of 1$3_61 feet: thencr S. 01' 56' 51" W. a distance of 71.77 foot to the eoutherly line of said Fee no. : thence' alaag said southerly lint S. 84' 13' 42" G. a distance of 246.23 feet to the Paint of beginning. - CanLaia?ag an area of 20,643 square feat of "land, =ore or leas. Together with a parcel cf Iand. far a permanent slope easement. Said eosc eat being d•saribad by oatas and .hounds as !alloys: Cc�ra.rcing at a 3/4-!nth i- _ Carnes of amid Fee Na, roe' pipe at the mast southwesterly ilea of said Fos 80-41904: thence along the westerly fine to a .5(8-inch Ho. , K. 01' 56' 51" E. a distance of 74.91 fs t Associates. it c rod with yellow plastic cap sta=yed corner of said Fee No. ; thence along Malt norther 1 f soot-a aft Fee Ho. l{, 6S' 3.5 ' 01- E. 4 s northerly line af_a girl Pain- a, a distance of 67. 40 fret to the Scginning: thence continuing along said northerly line ad said Tie No. N. 6;i' lent to e 5 g_ 13 01" Z. a distaaca of 45.04 / i:ch iron rod at the' re-entrant corocr of said Fec Ho.; thence along a line through said F.. Me'. Z. se' 03' 09" E. a distance of 143.26 feet; thence S. 01' 56' 51" W. a distance of 20.00 feat-; thence X. 88' 01' 09" R. a distance of 123 . 61 f..c to the paint of la-agitating. Carsa!niag an area of 3,269 square Q ze lest of land, more or lama. She basin of bearing for the shove deseript'an is bl=ed upon a Record of Survey pi'formed by Catusty Metropolitan Transportation p strictcc_ OregonIIeand filedrin Washington County. - EXKUUT ' PAGE s_L c • I 07/07/98 1.4:35 $1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC a011 • 41) 410 EXn(flTTi "A' STA._ FILE 6159002 Page 2 of Z April 7, 1992 FART Or r33 NO. 86C51674 A varcel of land. located in the BctZthaast 1/4 al seat_ors 36, 7. 1 b. , R. 1 R. . N.H. , vithim the C. Richardson C.L.C. No. S5 . Hashingtass county. Organ. said parcel of land being a Part ai that atrt.ain tract of lend canv.Yed to Ph 7L11: stavart and ataus_t Trust on :fava:sb.,t 6. /9811, end recorded in Fa♦ zfio. -• 26031574. 17a*haaetan Canty Dyed Records . Said psrc•1 hs3nq descri3od hr mat-as and' bounds me Callous Swoina.ing it a 3/4-iaah iron pipe at the moat .estwrly northwest came; a� acid ta• Na. ; thanes aiaag a northerly Iino of said F . fc.; N. Y4' 13 ' 42r Z. a distance of 246:23 fact: thence :Sang x lime thrcggh said nee ?to. : O. 01' 56' 51" x_ a distance of 248.76 tact to z aautharly lime at ta.id ?e. eo. : thane, along said southariy lime. : 8. 62 ' 49' 56" K. a .distaaca at 19.6.72 sear.. to a .5/2-inch irons rod vit:. allow plastic cap p -Ximpe Aszaaiatas. Ia."; thane* along a • . southarlr line of said lee He. . •3. 45 " 42 ' 51- u- 3 distance of 51.12 teat to a bars, se-41v vitt. brans crasher =tamped "XxI": th.noe slang a southwesterly line al said Few tfo_ . ff. 35' 23' 09" K. a distat3ev of 63.45 !met to 3/4d rag iron pip.; thence along the was t a tl ' lip. at Ha. , N. 01' 36 31" S. , a distance at 31 feet to the point at baQisnin . 1.02 co nulling an area of 7aquaria ot •9 aqua_ foot. o. l:nd. Wore or The basis at beaing• tar the above dawni,t_on a r Szced upon R.cc:d at Survar part'orlmed by 7Ca.z . Assoc atss , : coLx._y- H+t:coolit: Transportation - tc: led i= Ras:lingtan County, Cn- District of C_agoa, filed • • • EXHIBIT WIZ _ OF.�._ • 07/07/98 14:35 2T1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC Cj012 er• • INGRESS - EGRESS EASEMENT • An easement for ingress and egress over a portion of that • certain land described as Parcel 4 in Memorandum of Assignment recorded in Book 618 Page 161 on October 12 , 1966 , Washington County Deed Records , situated in the southeast 1/4 of Section 36 , T. 1 S . , R. 1 W. W .H. , within the G. Richardson D. L .C. No. 55 , Washington County, Oregon. Said easement described by - metes and bounds as follows : - Beginning at a 1/2-inch iron rod at the true point of beginning of said Parcel 4 being at the intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway and the northerly extension of the westerly line of that certain tract of land. as described in Fee No. 80 41904, recorded November 18, 1980 , Washington County Deed records ; thence along the northerly line of said Parcel . 4 ; being said southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway the following two courses : S. 65 " 38 ' 04" W. a distance of 8 .71 feet to and angle point; thence S. 55" 2.6 ' 04" W. a distance of 125 . 9 feet to the most northerly corner of that tract of land described as the exception to said Parcel 4; thence along the easterly lines of said exception the following four courses : s 42 " 06 ' 52" E. a distance of 43 . 2 feet; thence S. 14 - 08 ' 56" E. a distance of 53 . 0 feet; thence S. 00 ' 32 ' 26" E. a distance of 100 .0 feet; thence S. 03 ' 05 ' 04" W. a . distance of 287 . 9 feet to the southeasterly corner of said exception; thence N. 80 " 43 ' 47" E. a distance of 66 . 53 feet to a 3/4-inch iron pipe at the most westerly • corner of that certain tract of land as described in Fee No . 86 51674;• thence along the easterly line of said Parcel 4 , being the. westerly line of said Fee No. 86 51674 and the westerly line. of said Fee No. 80 41904 and said northerly extension, N.. 01 " 56' 51" E. a distance of 535. 93 feet to the paint of beginning. The basis of bearing- for the above description is based upon Record of Survey performed by Kampe Associates , Inc. , for Tri- County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, filed in Washington County, Oregon. 07/07/98 14:36 221 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC R 013 T. 1 S.. R. 1 W., W.M. ^wutttU.l CAP ALL WITHIN THE G. RICHARDSON D_LC_ NO. 55 SSOcIA S. C. AssocrAT�s. INC. WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON NN. FOR: TRI—COUNTY I4ET OPOUTAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF ORECCN APRIL 7, 1992 SCALE 1" 100' G 51 V" a' ` G l'• IN 5 �- 4 %�,9 E Z2g�93tk �s_ �os4oc~r� J • P.0_8. ,0or \ 0.30' FND 1/2-1R- FNQ 5/8-IR ,1 5 � Or; FND 3/4:V f $o S 65.38'04" W 555 p S 06 40' o > 0 26- E cO `D 8.71' 1 00 74.44' n S 5526'04" W 1` c.i - i 25.91-------- FND 3/4-IP 1 0 7080' : . . °a END 5/8-IR S 02'00'00" W c..+ . 1 3 z `l 0 2 43.2' — S42"06'52"E X12 4'- ,n; a LI N 514'08'56"E - �. • . 0 en 53.0' rn } S 00'3 E ` ., • . \FND 3/4"1P 100.0' FND 3/4'IP ' 0.39•E Lu E CEP10N AS ,�•,►� 'x' DESCRIBED IN 7.89 A PARCEL 4 11. 11 r .74 BK 618 pc 161 rni'Q - n OJ IotZ • , •►Pol. ....N.. T,?,: s . fpl 4,CV .. .3 0[60 o >� G\ a �� 6 2�� p.EZ N 5 6 '( ` G ° 5/8" X 30" IR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CA- STAMPED "KAUPE ASSOCIATES. INC' UNLESS O THER'NiSE NOTED 40S 45-42'51" W 91178(.D\ 66.53' 59.32' PL& ftc lil • .4 80"43'47" E CMf_ £NCINE R1Nc Iwo sURvEntic END 3/4"IP SET BRASS SCREW do • BRASS WASHER PUNCHED KAMPE ASSOCIATES "KAI" IN CONCRETE DITCH . 3G81 SA raRwi oR,vE • BANK t oswcco, oR 359703 )6\'‘\4146 5 ( o3) 35 .S29 S• Fi�z(SOJ) PRGUECr•91-773 SCAL 1 1t' 07/07/98 14:36 'b`1 503 241 1999 TMT DEV CO INC I�j014 pr. tAnici 1 rvr. IivyISCJJ — CLartcJJ cnau.L., OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 4, BOOK 615 PAGE 761 SLET 5/8"IP, 14 SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4 SEC 36 PUNCH MARX IN ALUMINUM CAP T_ 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M. STAMPED 'KAMPE, ALL WITHIN THE G. RICHARDSON D.LC. NO. 55 ASSOCIATES. INC. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON `• FOR: TR1-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON APRIL 7. 1992 • SCALE: 1 - 100' 1 Pi `LENS N \E' % AG Of t\ 9�Q FND 3 IR w �. ? �� M 22 $g 36` S. 20 55'o0•W - P.O.B. S �t4 \ - 0.30' fN0 1/21R --95° 5 8-IR [� �8 FNO 3/4`IP I z / T4 l��0 I w .O4Vkr Z .o S 65'38'04" W 5658 as S 06"40'26" E c° (0 Q 8.71' — °.No 74.44' i Lo S 55'26'04" W G1 • . (..11 125.9' FND 3/4"IP \ - 70.80' 4/ /10 FND 5/81R S 02-00'00" W c.,1 z z. 0 e'7 =1 0 m cv. 43.2' �— Cr) �� _I m S42"06'52•E 112 ,0�`� - 'I a 5 -14'08'56"E • SGS. FEE NO. 80 41904 o cn 53.0' v1 c" -} a, ° vi S 0032'26" E t\ E 279.8,E FND 3/4`1P 100.0' • N 84-13'427 END 3/41P W FNO 3/41p 0.39'E EXCEPTION AS in- 7.89'x' DESCRIBED IN co FEE NO. 86 51674 PARCEL 4 ;n 5K 618 PG 161 a, 5 r^3 z N PARCEL 4 N BOOK 618 PAGE 161 �9�$rk P S t- � E� G� P � � 52��5 G P� r'1 0 0 5 1 a 5/8- X 30` IR `MTH YELLOW PLASTIC CA- ' 07 • '4'5 v c- STAMPED `KAMPE ASSOCIATE5, INC.' .)�` UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 91I78XDV 66.53 S 45'42' 1" W PLANNING 54 3Z' CM PLANNING N 80'43'47" E .LANG SURVEYING• FND 3/4`1P SET BRASS SCREW & KAMPE ASSOCIATES ri- BRASS WASHER PUNCHED 3s81 sm. CARMAN DRIVE "KAI" IN CONCRETE DITCH LACE oswEC3. OREGON 97033 BANK (503)535-5291.FAX(503) 635-5480 eoncrr.o.�.�o .crA F-: r .. 100' 07/07/98 14:37 $`1 503 241 1999 TEST DEV CO INC Z 013 • • INGRESS - EGRESS EASEMENT An • easement for ingress and egress over a portion of that certain land described as Parcel 4 in Memorandum of Assignment recorded in Book 618 Page 161 on October 12 , 1966, Washington County Deed Records, situated in the southeast 1/4 of Section 36, T. 1 S. , R. 1 W. W .M. , within the G. Richardson D. L . C. No. 55 , Washington County, Oregon. Said easement described _by metes and bounds as follows : Beginning at a 1/2-inch iron rod at the true point of beginning of said Parcel 4 being at the intersection of the southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway and the northerly extension of the westerly line of that certain tract of land as described in Fee Na . 80 41904, recorded November 18 , 1980 , Washington County Deed records ; thence along the northerly line of said Parcel 4, being said southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway the following two courses : S . 65 ' 38 ' 04" W. a distance of 8 .71 feet to and angle point; thence S . 55' 26 ' 04" W. a distance of 125 . 9 feet to the most northerly corner of that tract of land described as the exception to said Parcel 4; thence along the easterly lines of said exception the following four courses : 5 42' 06 ' 52" E. a distance of 43 . 2 feet; thence S. 14' 08 ' 56" E. a distance of 53 . 0 feet; thence S . 00 ' 32 ' 26" E. a distance of 100 . 0 feet; thence 5 . 03 ' 05 ' 04" W. a . _ distance of 287 . 9 feet to the southeasterly corner of said exception; thence N. 80 ' 43 ' 47" E. a distance of 66 . 53 feet to a 3/4-inch iron pipe at the most westerly corner of that certain tract of land as described in Fee No . 86 51674;• thence along the easterly line of said Parcel 4 , being the westerly line of said Fee No . 86 51674 and the westerly line of said Fee No. 80 41904 and said northerly extension, N. 01' 56 ' 51" E. a distance of 535 . 93 feet to the point of beginning . - The basis of bearing for the above description is based upon Record of .Survey performed by Kampe Associates, Inc. , for Tri- County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon , filed in Washington County-, Oregon. axkb ± 13 TVA January 13, 1999 Michael C. Robinson Stoel Rives LLP Attorneys Standard Insurance Center 71. 900 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, Oregon 97204-1268 RE: Act 3 Tigard Cinemas Site Development Review Dear Michael: The following items have been corrected or revised in response to your letter dated December 18, 1998 and your letter dated December 22, 1998 pertaining to the letter of incompleteness issued by the City of Tigard dated December 11, 1998. 1. The Grading/ Erosion Control Plan, Composite Utility Plan, and Landscape Plan have all been revised by W & H Pacific to show the driveway entry on the west side of the property, for a street connectivity path, matching the Conceptual Site Plan. 2. W & H Pacific has prepared preliminary sizing calculations for the proposed water quality facilities. 3. There will be only one tree that is 18" in diameter that will be removed because of the half street improvements along 72"d Avenue. It is shown on all of the civil engineering drawings as being removed per W & H Pacific. There are no other trees =_ that are over 12" in diameter that are being removed. ;= 4. The Composite Site Plan has been revised to show driveways at the proposed Atlanta Street alignment locations at the east and west sides of the property. 5. The plan has also been revised to show shade areas for the driveway connectivity paths that substitute for the public street dedications. This is shown for Atlanta Street and also partially for the backer road that would be located to the North of the wetlands on the new parking lot, but not on the Tri-Met parking lot. 6. The parking has been calculated to show the parking spaces lost by the dedication of the streets, Atlanta Street and the backer street, and that the parking in the Tri-Met property would provide adequate parking. Enclosed are 30 sets of prints, folded, of the revised drawings. In addition, there is a copy of a letter from Brady Berry and 24 copies of the sizing calculations for the proposed water quality facilities. If you any questions or need anything else, please call me. Sincerely: 64j 0 Allan J. Norris s Cc: Tim Reed Dave Gellos Principals Robert L.Thompson,FAIA Edward Vaivoda Jr..AIA David P.Cellos,AIA Kurt K.Schultz,ALA Issociatcs James P.Bocci Marc A.Lab I.Norris EXHIBIT 13 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD A . ALL 41 I - PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ;h,ipm:4uttRylt,.,rcoipmunitti NON-RESIDENTIAL KATE Illlq 4 1 APPLICANT: A c i treed Q!/'S � I uL. AGENT: 1 L Soto Va%veq(a A—tl44fit4.v-r, S Phone:[ I ' Phone: [ l 22e--©c‘,25/ PROPERTY LOCAT1614: �� n,�- �, rr AA ADDRESS: I 1 6-Z-4 S(' ) PC Pfr 4] 1I wa TAX MAP/TAX LOT: 1St 3.G D c 5C� NJ y NECESSARY APPLICATION[Sl: 5 i•-t€ 0 e o€f &i.ie& f rs2 vici c.c> PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: _ 0 add 4 e-;41 ew..14 fo -1"1..¢- .e..)Cio(Jk i J c;,-.42 P t4. 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: 6atr*( edsmuitvca !IL) C C -__) TONING DESIGNATION: r e.I.A.e tra C o LA4 a,rcr€ ( — G� , CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT 5ii-- FACILITATOR: Se P TEAM AREA PHONE: [5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS tvlinimu lot size: �i a sq. ft. Average lot width: ft. Maximum building height: L S ft. Setbacks: Front +►j4 ft. Side 4/4 ft. Rear ti Q ft. Corner n ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: SS % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: I % [Refer to Code Section 18.67.O50 ] ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 fee nless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The aepth of all lots shall not exc d 2Lt. times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applica oning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots) CITY OF MUD Pm-Application Conference Notes Page 1 018 MOM-assl/eoumAa .'IcaUoo/PleonlogOsoertmeotSectioe SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: 6 feet from the centerline of S Zi.4) ke`'t LA Established areas: 1/Q feet from � ✓9 i Lower intensity zones: /1la feet, along the site's 1.e/9 boundary. Flag lot: 10-foot side yard setback. 14 ,+ [Refer to Code Section and 18.9 61 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. �--- [Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) AR'P KING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: ( race, �'' e''¢'y Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): 1. 41rrvc�ce `fa et-x.4 �• (Q t � ``° °�w� Secondary use required parking: t1 J Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): ® No more than 40°0 of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 8 inches x 18 feet. • Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.020] Handicapped Parking: • All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. • The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions. are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. r Minimum number of accesses: l T w 0 Minimum access width: 3d • Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.1081 CITY OfT1CARD Pre-ApulicationConference Notes Page 211$ MOM-Residential applIcatloorPlapoin9 Department Sectloe WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS \rValkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs. ramps or elevators of all commercial. institutional, and industrial uses. to the streets which provide the required access and egress Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring develo ments_ \ (Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501 _,--------" LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10.000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.010-0901 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway. road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Section 18.1021 __ BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments. especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied Dy a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required: these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities. and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) The required uffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. 01/0 feet along south boundary. 1// feet along west boundary. In addition:sight obscuring screening is required along LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum ., caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. ) A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms. decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.1081 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 N0N•iesidentlel application/Pleeole9 Department Section SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.1141 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries.. is the responsibility of the applicant.icant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibitedyvithin floodplain. b 5L uS,4 SNL-ti44if*g ;Li t4 A f, e- r t e 'fo r.St✓ -- G'aS5►,neIrS 4+Gve 5S t"-)4:71411.44c [Refer to Code Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.B. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USAI BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 Purpose: Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the definecj boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of e portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. CITY OF FIGARO Pro-AApficatloo Conference Metes Page 4 of$ ISM-issi/sutlal afillatla/Mantuf Warmest Ssctlsi Locahon_o Vegetated Corridor: In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R f;0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SIAM] /tRE_E REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot. parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D: Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D: Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation: • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025] MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged. by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city. either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Auplication Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential appllcaUoe/PlaRnI g Ospartment SeCUee The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow • growth to maturity In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may. with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(DI ep0�� -- 144114/ . PLAT NA�S ERVATION ' 1 r, R�'e `FL`' _ -77.77 ` e & A i SUBDIVISION PtA '•'-" • � Prior to submitting\a Subdivision land use application with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 648-88841 NARRAfVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. `, Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) 0 I r�c�,p y 11^4?"'4' �'�"ia wit CODE SECTIONS y-tI,�d �f•a�a(�I 024n1A__ 18.80 _ 18.92 �J��:100 108 _148.120 x-'18.150 18.84 18.96 v 18.1021 14 18.130 18.160 18.88 18.98 106 116 — 18.134 18.1 .164 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests. the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32.Section.050) When a condition of approval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the: members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application i' will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 018 MON-8esidentlel eppllcetloo/lhpple9 Department Section BUILDING PERMITS Plans for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has been issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. RECYCLING -~ -- -— Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride ' Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.1161 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: -- © ( v- , a y,. le dCsc ass:el V `jtf 7/'p va a441 ; 4(0'10 (Al _7�t� )4i?'.1!(Q W Qvr, )SGk Q / r 01 05 L. 1' s .c al/s w e✓p ;'s , s . /' �1 Sir �a S ^c,�'w, c2✓e�r7 �h�w� to-e_ e�eiu•�2 r1 .L4 �r- ,„7 k..el.5 4T .-.4( .44. %+-s t) .e•C i a` errs 0+� tm t pv1 tM (p.t‘L- ii v� ♦ S J'" .. I,,v• - .. s .4 - /. • �p t__,a l v1.4Cht - o}` 41%\P 14.4fe__ e S CL:)! u s� 0 4,4014.- <, Q spy 4'4•7 y� v.ossl ¢>� `f�c.c w su t D� f e/144-;\S"s� 12- �Gls� uJ�Y 4 l}s1 5 4- f✓rte S2 ✓' l cry/�� sv v' wr t. l '/ t+.e • toe vo v'Ia 0 • c��a s PROCEDURE ✓ Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or droppec4 off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1)a 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page]of 8 NOM-Aesideotlal applicatlon/PIannng Dopartmeat Suttee The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an - application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written . recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard P/4. 4%J'`� Cµ•«-•,-$44° l . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process ig available from the Plah wing Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thin pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following this conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: [5031 639-4171 FAX: (503)684-1297 h:\loglo\petty\maters\preapp-c.ust (EDgloeeriog Section:masters\Droepp-c.eeg] 11-1Aer-97 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 MOM-#esidentlel aoolicetleuRleulee Oeeertneot Sallee (51 Dc, 41.04 City of Tigard, Oregon PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: 7Z to feet from centerline. (17(1Afir) T� ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: z (v.) street improvements will be necessary along -vv (�µ' ( ) street improvements will be necessary along ( Street improvements on L �,, shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector 13 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department Section streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( " Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 7Z"``6 � i _ � ,6 J Prior to bF AD©rrt , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee ' -lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) lO inch line which is located in 4QJ c l c . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to 'ITC- UK..D'1ac1 Pa�D1'�i�t its fy, --ri (" . CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineering Department Section Water Supply: The �t C\ig, 4 `( Water District - Phone:(503) 2-4 -S551 provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. �t� lleNl - v 1.)-(( T- 1,4u.._ re, APR-R.4,4A-- Nagn S„ €� Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. K u S, t(T Ott ANL) Cul STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineering Department Section 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be ', -1:7i.$. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with t e development application. It is anticipated that this project will re uire 4 2l0 .e>� q �K. ' Construction of an on-site water quality facility. F2=P--_N ) ia-k`-4-'' 'z `-sc Payment of the fee in-lieu. iii�� -.=i/�'e ,. . - ice r► TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. o pktr.77T Fes— L(ta( St fr∎t� . PERMITS e c_.—� ILAP►Zaf 'Wt` c IA . Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Department. Building Department Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: �__LAk. ! I r (D(q7 aid ENGINEERING DEP' RTMENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 h\login\patty\preapp eng (Master section preapp-r mst) December 23, 1996 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,�Alt APPLICATION CHECKLIST T CITY OF F TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: �;'., _ Date: I I /I g1/47 I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE J MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies E) Filing Fee $ Sec? SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 2G 1 . Vicinity map d� 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10°I ) t9-'-�/ 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings Cgt---� (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources j 10. Location of existing utilities and easements d�� 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways �/ LAND LSE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 E3) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies --' 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties rg/ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site q/ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets �/ that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas 4/ (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 20 The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios a� (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) Q� (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development o---� 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report 0 (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c`--- (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated D LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Drawings Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures Cam' proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ❑ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials m.- 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ; ❑ Sign drawings shall,be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part e Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Pa ' 'on/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . The owner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authorized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent\to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanentlbuildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25 ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements ❑ 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the pro sed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not prec de efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION LIST PAGE 3 OF 5 t) Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of t)e subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater thary 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right- f-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upoe such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be\shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application \ ❑ ■ LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 4 OF 5 J) Solar Access Calculatio ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies /0 (.04j-owls LeMcii h:Vogin\patty\mastersV-cid ist.mst May 23,1995 LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 October 1997 November 1997 December 1997 S M T W T F S Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) S M T W T F S 4 1 2 3 4 pp 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 • 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 30 31 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 2 3 4 5 7 8 9A Bob Cline 9A No pre-aps: 319-1563 Brian in seminar. 10 Brendan Enright (re-scheduled) 11 Ron Champion SDR @11642 SW 9 - - :10 11 12 13 14 5 8A No Preapps 8A No pre-aps: this is a Holiday Brian in training. 8:30 Do no 10 Ryan Young schedule any 827-0293 CUP pre-apps-this is 8900 SW 11 Ken 11 will fonner st Sandblast, sub 653-9093 16 17 -18 119 20 - 9A Allan Norris '9A No pre-aps: w/Thompson Brian in training. Vivadoda 10 Bill Langston RE: Candlewood Hotel (714) 11 Brett/Keith AKS engineering 692-5887 SDR 27 28 • 9A No preaps this is a Holiday. 1 9:22AM Friday, November 07, 1997 tom• .4L— 9'� R 4—Q — ✓✓_ O'DONNELL RAMIS CREW READ APR 16 1998 CORRIGAN & BACHRACH, LLP JEFF H.BACHRACH CLACKAMAS COUNTY OFFICE MARK L.BUSCH ATTORNEYS AT LAW 181 N.Grant,Suite 202 D.DANIEL CHANDLER++ 1727 N.W.Hoyt Street Canby,Oregon 97013 DOMINIC G.COLLETTA•• Portland,Oregon 97209 TELEPHONE:(503)266-1149 CHARLES E.CORRIGAN* TELEPHONE: (503)222-4402 STEPHEN F.CREW FAX:(503)243-2944 MARTIN C.DOLAN VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON OFFICE GARY F.FIRESTONE• First Independent Place WILLIAM E.GAAR PLEASE REPLY TO PORTLAND OFFICE 1220 Main Street,Suite 451 G.FRANK HAMMOND• Vancouver,Washington 98660-2964 MALCOLM JOHNSON' TELEPHONE:(360)699-7287 MARK P.O'DONNELL FAX:(360)699-7221 T.CHAD PLASTER• Aril 14, 1998 TIMOTHY V.RAMIS p WILLIAM J.STALNAKER JAMES M.COLEMAN ANDREW H.STAMP SPECIAL COUNSEL BARTON J.WACHSTETER • ALSO ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN WASHINGTON •• ALSO ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN CALIFORNIA ++ ALSO ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN WASHINGTON AND MONTANA Michael C. obinson, Esq. Stoel Riv LLP Suite 2 0 900 5th Avenue Portland, OR 97204 Re: Tigard Cinemas Dear Mike: I have received your April 1, 1998 letter to Jim Hendryx, and respond because I believe that the letter des not accurately state the position of the City of Tigard. First, with respect to reservation of rights-of-way across your client's property, I have suggested to the City staff that it may wish to consider whether it would recommend approval of your client's application based upon a street reservation if Act III should offer it as a means of complying with the Tigard Triangle Street Plan. I have not, at this point, suggested the use of a reservation as a condition of approval. If your client were to offer it as a basis for showing compliance with required criteria, the City would of course have to be convinced that no Dolan issues were involved. As a preliminary matter, it appears to me that a development restriction on land which remains in private ownership, the balance of which is otherwise developable, would not run afoul of Dolan. If you have authority to the contrary, I would be open to considering it. Second, with respect to condemnation, I recall that it was you, and not the City, who introduced this subject into the conversation. In our telephone conversation of March 17, 1998, I asked how the applicant would address its burden of showing compliance with the Street Plan. Your response was that the project could be approved as proposed based upon the theory that the City `1 O'DONNELL RAMIS CREW CORRIGAN &BACHRACH, LLP Michael C. Robinson, Esq. April 14, 1998 Page 2 could later condemn street right-of-way and allow the cinema to continue operation as a nonconforming use. Among the questions which I raised in response to your suggestion that an applicant could rely on the future exercise of City condemnation authority as a means of showing compliance with applicable criteria is the question of the effect such an interpretation would have on computation of severance damages. I recount this portion of the conversation in order to remind you that it was not the City that introduced the subject of condemnation and its consequences into the conversation about your client's application. If you choose to rely on condemnation as an aspect of your theory of compliance with city regulations, our office will have the obligation to raise questions about the consequences of reliance upon your theory. While I have doubts about the defensibility of a condemnation/nonconforming use approach to comprehensive plan compliance, I am certainly open to further analysis of the subject because I understood our conversation to be a preliminary identification of issues, rather than a final statement of position. I am writing in order to be sure that our upcoming meeting is focused on the questions raised regarding whether the project can be approved under the City's regulations as they currently stand. Identification of appropriate conditions of approval, whether they are right-of-way reservations, improvements to SW 72"d Avenue, or something else would appear to be secondary considerations at this point. Very truly yours, n v Timothy V. Ramis TVR/srb tvr/tigard/cd/robinson.It I cc: Mr. Dick Bewersdor/f Mr. Jim Hendryx CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 87-12 GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS APPLICATION: Request by General American Theaters to establish an indoor, five theater complex and related facilities on property zoned C--G (Commercial General) and located at 11625 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DC, Tax Lot 500) . DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FACTS 1 . Background Information The original Director' s decision was issued on June 26, 1987. In consideration of written concerns submitted by neighboring property owners, this amended decision has been issued . A drive-in theater has occupied the property for a considerable number of years . The Hearings Officer recently approved a proposal to modify the existing culvert that accommodates water flow in a drainageway that runs along the northern boundary of the property (SL 87-07) . Due to staff workload and the complexity of some of the traffic issues related to the site development review application, the staff recommendation could not be completed in time for the hearing. In order to avoid unnecessary time delay, the two applications were considered separately as permitted by the Code, with the Hearings Officer making the decision on the Sensitive Lands (SL 87-07) application and the staff issuing a decision on Site Development Review (SDR 87-12) . 2. Vicinity Information Properties to the north and west are also zoned C-G (Commercial General) and land to the northeast on the opposite side of 72nd Avenue is zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) . A single family residential neighborhood that is zoned R-3 .5 (Residential, 3 .5 units/acre) borders the subject property on the south and to the southeast on the east side of 72nd Avenue . 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description The drive-in facilities have largely been removed and the majority of the site is surfaced with pavement or gravel . A drainageway crosses near the northern boundary of the property and the existing culvert located under the driveway entrance is to be replaced and lengthened as approved in case SL. 87-07. The applicant proposes to construct a five theater building with a total capacity of 1,938 persons . The building will be located near the southern property line with parking provided to the north, east, and west. The NOTICE OF DECISION - GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS - SDR 87-12 - PAGE 1 existing access and traffic signal at Pacific Highway will continue to serve as the main entrance to the site with a second access proposed on 72nd Avenue . The 72nd Avenue driveway will be open only during theater business hours . 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Metzger Water District, Building Inspection Division, and General Telephone have no objections to the proposal. The State Highway Division notes that an access traffic report has been submitted for review and that an access permit will be required . The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The proposed development will have its primary vehicular access via an existing private roadway connecting directly to Pacific Highway and a secondary vehicular access via a driveway connection to SW 72nd Avenue. b. A traffic analysis dated 4-29-• 87 and prepared by Robert Keech, P.E. , of Keech Associates, Inc. , supports the proposed access pattern. The traffic analysis reviewed alternatives for theater access, including alternative future alignments of SW 72nd Avenue. Based on the Keech analysis, it appears that the direct roadway connection to Pacific Highway, using the existing driveway, provides the least impact on the public street system. c . The peak traffic periods at a theater are generally of short duration and generally occur outside the times of peak traffic on adjoining streets . d . Pacific Highway is a State highway under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) . It appears that ODOT will require the applicant to provide intersection and signal improvements for the private roadway approach adequate to provide for the traffic volumes projected by the Keech traffic analysis . e. SW 72nd Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the City and is classified as a major collector which provides for 2-4 moving lanes of traffic . Existing improvements and right-of-way are substandard . The Tigard Triangle Traffic Circulation Study, prepared for the City by Associated Transportation Engineering and Planning, Inc. , and completed in October of 1986, recommends that SW 72nd Avenue be improved to provide 2 moving lanes plus turn lanes where needed. The Study suggests that SW 72nd Avenue will need to be further widened to 4 travel lanes plus turn lanes in the future as the Tigard Triangle approaches full development. In order to meet full design standards, it will be necessary to substantially revise the existing vertical alignment of 72nd Avenue between Pacific Highway and Baylor Street; hence, it is not practical to provide half-street improvements along the applicant' s SW 72nd Avenue frontage until the entire street can be improved . A waiver of remonstrance for participation in a future local improvement district NOTICE OF DECISION - GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS - SDR 87-12 - PAGE 2 should be required . The applicant should also demonstrate, by completing a preliminary centerline design profile and necessary cross sections, that eventual improvement of SW 72nd Avenue to design standards will not significantly impact the proposed site improvements . f. Area residents expressed concern over bicycle and pedestrian safety . The staff evaluated the input and found the concerns are warranted and . should be addressed . The transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan currently recommends provision for pedestrian and bicycle circulation along SW 72nd Avenue . These improvements are usually required with new development when standard street improvements are installed, which is not the case with this project. However, the need for these improvements appears to be present with the theater development. Therefore, staff suggests an interim solution requiring the applicant to install a 5 foot shoulder, 4 feet of which is to be 2" of Class C asphalt, along the applicant' s entire SW 72nd Avenue frontage. The structural section of the shoulder shall include 6" of 3/4 "-0" rock . These improvements shall be included in the applicants public improvement drawings and permit for work already proposed on SW 72nd Avenue. g . Intersection site distance on SW 72nd Avenue. It appears that the applicant can significantly exceed the sight distance requirements for 30 mph, given the location of the proposed SW 72nd Avenue access. Therefore, in an effort to address the residents concerns, it is recommended that the intersection sight distance requirement be changed to a minimum of 400 feet, which exceeds the requirements of 35 mph. h. The City has budgeted funds for design of an improved intersection of 72nd Avenue at Pacific Highway . When completed, the intersection improvements will further enhance access to the theater complex . In the interim, the proposed private roadway access is expected to function adequately as the primary theater access to Pacific Highway . Based on the Keech analysis, theater traffic can be adequately accommodated without the 72nd/Pacific Highway intersection improvements . i . The applicant has proposed a gate on the 72nd Avenue driveway to prohibit vehicular access from 72nd Avenue when the theater is not in use. The gate should provide a way to avoid potential problems of motorists using the parking lot as a through route between Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue . j . The Transportation Map of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1983, recommends a street connection between the proposed Dartmouth Street extension and SW 68th Parkway, following the general alignment of Red Rock Creek . Subsequent data from the 1986 Tigard Triangle Traffic Circulation Study supports the future need for local street connections between Dartmouth Street extension and SW 68th Avenue. Based on data from the 1986 study, it appears that the alignment of the local street connections is not critical . NOTICE OF DECISION - GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS - SDR 87-12 - PAGE 3 k . At its meeting of June 3, 1987, NPO #4 provided the following comment: "NPO #4 members suggest that a study be made of the feasibility of extending the existing SW Atlanta Street westerly to SW 72nd Avenue and continue across 72nd Avenue with an entrance to general American Theater "Moyer" from suggested extension of SW Atlanta Street to conform with existing terrain to the East of SW 72nd Avenue. The entrance to the theater group would be off of the proposed SW Atlanta Street and thereby eliminating the necessity of foot traffic crossing the extension of SW Atlanta Street. Also the extension of SW Atlanta Street westerly to the proposed extension of SW Dartmouth Street would complete a westerly loop within the Triangle. " 1 . It appears that both the roadway alignment suggested by the Comprehensive Plan and the alternative alignment suggested by NPO #4 are feasible routes and would satisfy the future local traffic needs suggested by the 1986 Study . However, construction of the roadway west of 72nd Avenue appears to serve no purpose until it can be actually connected to a completed Dartmouth Street extension. The applicant: has located site improvements so that the local street connection is not precluded from crossing adjacent to and possibly through a portion of their site in the future. Engineering recommends that the applicants dedicate the northerly 25' of their property, lying east of the SW Pacific Highway access, to the public for street and utility purposes . This will help facilitate the potential connection in the future. This dedication will require that site improvements be located at least 25' from the existing property line. If it is determined in the future that this dedicated right-of-way is not needed to facilitate the connection, it could be vacated which would return it to the applicant' s property . Once returned it potentially could be used for additional parking. No improvement to this dedicated right-of-way is recommended at this time . However, the applicant should sign a waiver of remonstrance for future improvement of the above described street connection. m. The site is traversed east to west by an existing major drainage system (Red Rock Creek) that is closed west of the primary access and open east of the primary access . The applicant proposes to upgrade the existing closed system and leave the open system as is. Engineering would recommend that the applicant regrade the open system to improve capacity and flow. The upgrading of the closed system will require submission of detailed engineering calculations, plans and a public improvement permit. Both systems will require public drainage easements . n. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by an existing 10" mainline which traverses the site from east to west. NPO #4 has expressed concern relating to: a. The possible need for a traffic signal at the 72nd Avenue driveway . NOTICE OF DECISION - GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS - SDR 87-12 - PAGE 4 b. Streetlights along 72nd Avenue. c. Street improvements on 72nd Avenue including widening sidewalk and raising the grade for the lowest portion of the site. d . Accommodating the westerly extension of Atlanta Street. The NPO also suggested that a study be conducted regarding the feasibility of extending Atlanta Street so that it forms an intersection at 72nd and the proposed theater driveway . Concerns were expressed by several adjoining neighbors pertaining to noise, building placement, security, lighting, traffic on 72nd Avenue, sight distance on 72nd Avenue, and the use of the theater driveway as a short cut to Pacific Highway . No other comments have been received . B . ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed development is consistent with Community Development Code requirements for building height and setback, access, lot coverage, and the intended use . Additional discussion is warranted relating to parking, signs, landscaping and buffering, future street alignments, and construction traffic . Parking The Code requires 485 parking spaces for this project and 781 spaces are proposed . This number will be reduced slightly to accommodate the additional street right—of—way for the future east—west street discussed by Engineering. Additional Code standards for a minimum of 10 handicapped parking spaces and 32 bicycle parking spaces also apply to this proposal . The basic concept for parking is appropriate but additional information should be submitted regarding parking space dimensions, location of the 10 required handicapped spaces, and the design of the bicycle parking spaces . Signs The applicant has indicated a desire to retain the existing freestanding sign on Pacific Highway . Although the dimensions are not known, it is clearly a non—conforming sign. It may be retained presently as long as it is not modified or moved . The Code requires a non—conforming sign such as this must be brought into conformance by March 20, 1988 . The City will expect this sign to be removed or modified to meet Code Standards by this date. Landscaping and Buffering The proposed landscaping plan meets Code requirements for landscaped area, street trees, and parking area standards . The only portion of the plan that needs revision is the 20 foot landscaped strip shown along the southern property boundary . NOTICE OF DECISION — GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS — SDR 87-12 — PAGE 5 The applicant proposes to retain approximately 18 of the larger existing trees in this area and supplement this vegetation with ivy ground cover and several Douglas fir trees directly behind the theater building . The existing chain link fence is proposed to remain. Chapter 18 . 100 requires that when commercial development occurs adjacent to residentially zoned property, visual screening which includes an evergreen hedge or solid fence, trees, and ground cover must be provided . Preservation of the existing trees and the firs near the building will fulfill part of the screening requirement but additional trees will be necessary along the entire southern property line. The electrical plan for the site indicates that a trench for electrical power will be dug within the south landscaped area between 72nd and the building. This trench should be moved further north in order to avoid damaging the roots of trees that are to be retained . Along with the screening standards in Chapter 18. 100, Section 18 . 120. 180 considers use conflicts related to noise and privacy . Because of the close proximity of the building exits and parking lot to the southern property line and the operation of the facility during the evening, it appears that the existing chain link fence will not be adequate. A solid barrier such as a wood fence or masonry wall should replace the existing fence in order to help deflect noise created by movie patrons and automobiles entering and leaving the site. In order to help reduce noise and associated problems during construction, the fence should be erected prior to or in conjunction with the construction of the foundation. Future Street Alignment As noted by Engineering, the alignment of the future street connection between the Dartmouth extension and 68th Avenue has not been finalized . The dedication of street right-of-way along the northern property boundary will retain the option of completing this street in the future. Construction Traffic. on 72nd Avenue The applicant has no objection to routing all construction traffic onto Pacific Highway and not utilize the proposed 72nd Avenue driveway . C. DECISION The Planning Director approves SDR 87-12 subject to the following conditions : 1 . Prior to issuance of site grading permits: a. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Engineering Section, by completing a preliminary centerline design profile and necessary cross sections, that the eventual improvement of SW 72nd Avenue to 35 MPH design standards will not significantly impact the proposed site improvements . NOTICE OF DECISION - GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS - SDR 87-12 - PAGE 6 2. Prior to issuance of foundation and building permits : a. Additional right—of—way shall be dedicated to the public along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage to increase the right—of—way to 40 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right—of—way centerline as established by county survey #20,942. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. Contact Jon Feigion in Engineering for forms and further information. b. A non—remonstrance agreement for the future development of SW 72nd Avenue and the future street connection between Dartmouth and SW 72nd Avenue shall be executed by the applicant, on City forms, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recording. Contact Jon Feigion for forms and further information. c. The applicant shall provide for a minimum of 400 feet of sight distance with the SW 72nd Avenue access using ' 3 .5 feet for eye height and 4.25 feet for object height. The applicant shall also provide for deceleration and acceleration lanes to 30 MPH design speed at this access. d. The applicant shall install a 5 foot wide shoulder, 4 feet of which is to be paved, along the 72nd Avenue frontage. Design of this improvement shall be included with the public improvement drawings and permit work for 72nd Avenue. Any alternative designs shall be approved by the Engineering Division. e. The applicant shall dedicate as right—of—way to the public for street and utility purposes, the north 25 feet of the site east of the SW Pacific Highway primary access . The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. Contact Jon Feigion in Engineering for forms and further information. Any terms for vacating said right—of—way if not utilized by the City must be approved by the Planning Director. f. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right—of—way of SW Pacific Highway . A copy of said permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Office prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. g. The applicant shall reconstruct the existing closed drainage system to public standards. The property owners shall dedicate a 20 foot wide public storm drainage easement for said closed storm drainage system. Calculations and topographic service area/basin map shall be provided as a supplement to the public improvement plans, to demonstrate evidence of area/basin full development serviceability . The location and capacity of existing and proposed lines shall be addressed. h. The applicant shall regrade the existing open ditch drainage system (east of the primary site access roadway) to provide for capacity for a 2.5—year storm flow. Said regrading plans shall be included with the public improvement drainage system. NOTICE OF DECISION — GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS — SDR 87-12 — PAGE 7 i . Upon completion of cursory review, seven (7) sets of plan—profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for final approval . Submit: plans and materials to John Hagman in Engineering. j . Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans . The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Assurance, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans . k . The applicant shall submit a revised site and landscaping plan for Planning Director approval which contain the following: 1) The street right—of—way dedication required along 72nd Avenue and the northern property line 2) Dimensions of parking spaces 3) Minimum of 10 handicapped parking spaces 4) Minimum of 32 bicycle parking spaces including bike rack design 5) Location and design of driveway gate at 72nd Avenue 6) Solid wood fence or masonry wall a minimum of 6 feet in height along the southern property boundary that meets Community Development Code criteria set forth in Section 18 . 120. i.80(a)(4 and 5) . Said fence shall be completed within 30 days from the foundation and/or building permit issuance date. 7) Revised landscaping buffer along the southern boundary that is consistent with Chapter 18 . 100 of the Community Development Code 8) Plan for exterior lighting 3 . Prior to occupancy permits : a. Completion of all improvements to Pacific Highway, primary access drive, open and closed drainage systems and SW 72nd Avenue. b. All improvements and landscaping materials shown on the approved plans (Cond 2.k . ) shall be installed. 4 . The conditions of approval of Sensitive Lands permit (SL 87---07) shall be satisfied . NOTICE OF DECISION — GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS — SDR 87-12 — PAGE 8 5. Construction traffic shall not utilize the 72nd Avenue driveway for access or egress . 6. The 72nd Avenue driveway gate shall be open only during theater business hours . 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1 . Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 2 . Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL. BE FINAL. ON July X1_._1967 _ UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3 . Appeal : Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18. 32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 :30 P.M. July 16, 19.87. 4. Questions : If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd . , PO Box 2.3397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171 . _.� ---- /I,___ __._PREPARED BY: Keith Liden, Senior Planner DAT_ - � ,,1 -- -i/ /P5 William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED I MI = .� Ct-m• �! ',6 { r Ism\r LI i i. i. sod 1 I - =: :*S: ir Alp ■ x.'11 - r 1M .E ■ • i PIIIIW III Ii�la ,• A,MB ib. i.= lir Al•` I .I- .r.-- l A -- rT T [ i� ,v r - �- I 1 , -^ l t IfIL �� . NOTICE OF DECISION — GENERAL AMERICAN THEATERS — SDR 87-12 — PAGE 9 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 88-27 EASTGATE THEATRE, INC. (Tigard Cinemas) APPLICATION: Request by Eastgate Theatre, Inc. to construct a 6 theater addition to the existing 5 theater complex, adding approximately 17,000 square feet with an additional 944 seats to the existing 1,795 seat complex. Location: 11626 S.W. Pacific Hwy. (WCTM 1S1 36DC, TL 500) . Zone: C-G (Commercial General) . DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted below: A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background Information: In 1987, the City granted a Site Development Review approval (SDR 87-12) to develop the existing five (5) auditorium theatre complex which contains 1,795 seats. In addition to the theater, a new driveway access was established onto 72nd Avenue and the existing access onto Pacific Highway was improved. Parking spaces for 650 vehicles were provided in conjunction with this theater. 2. Vicinity Information: Properties to the north and west are also zoned C-G (Commercial General) , and the land to northeast on the opposite side of 72nd Avenue is zoned C-P (Commercial-Professional) . A single-family residential neighborhood that was recently rezoned from R-3.5 (Residential 3.5 units/acre) to C-G (Commercial General) , borders the subject property on the south. Additional single family development which is zoned R-3.5 lies to the southeast on the east side of 72nd Avenue. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to expand the existing theater with corresponding additions to the east and west sides of the building which will add six auditoriums to the five theater complex. The addition will contain 944 seats, for a total of 2,739 seats within the entire complex. Parking and landscaped areas will be amended somewhat to accommodate the new addition. The most notable change to the site plan will involve the redistribution of parking spaces and landscaped areas on the north, east and west sides of the theater. Landscaping along the perimeter of the project will remain unchanged. Parking spaces are proposed to total 701, and the existing driveways to 72nd Avenue and Pacific Highway are not intended to be modified. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 88-27 - Eastgate Theatre - Page #1 An update to the initial traffic report by Keach Associates, Inc. was submitted indicating that the traffic impact onto Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue will not increase provided that the scheduling is staggered between the larger existing theaters and the smaller proposed theaters. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The additional theaters, reportedly, will not increase the traffic impact onto adjacent streets since each theater's beginning and ending times will be phased with the existing theaters. Traffic will increase overall, but the amount of traffic at the peak will remain the same. Staff and the State are concerned as to exactly how the schedules of the 11 theaters are going to be staggered to have sequential beginning and ending times. The traffic report indicates that the theater schedule should be able to be modified to limit the impact to less than the impact of the two largest theaters ending and beginning within a 15 minute period. The two largest theaters have a combined seating of 1,020. The traffic analysis for the access design as it currently exists was based on a "worst case" condition in which performances in the two largest theatres end and begin simultaneously, with all seats filled in both theaters. The applicant has not submitted a schedule to demonstrate that the enlarged facility will not exceed the "worst case" conditions of the original traffic analysis. b. Since the prior decision, the City has received complaints from customers of the theater, local residents, and travelers of 72nd Avenue of inadequate sight distance north of the theater's access to. 72nd Avenue. Staff has reviewed the conditions at the site and concur with the citizens that additional sight distance is desirable. Vehicles entering the access, traveling north on 72nd Avenue and vehicles exiting the site, turning right onto 72nd Avenue do not have adequate sight distance. This is due to the crest of the 72nd Avenue hill, just north of the access, restricting the ability to see vehicles traveling south on 72nd Avenue. The previous decision required the applicant to provide a 400 foot sight distance for the 72nd Avenue access. This requirement was met as measured from the centerline of the access, as required. However, for vehicles in the right turn lane of the access drive and for southbound vehicles turning left into the driveway, additional sight distance should be provided. It is staff's recommendation that this crest be reconstructed to provide increased sight distance. The speed for major collector NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 88-27 - Eastgate Theatre - Page #2 streets is 35 mph. . The corresponding vertical curve design criteria requires the curve length to be 40 to 50 times the change in grade before and after the curve. The street reconstruction should replace the existing pavement width as it currently exists. The waiver for future 72nd Avenue improvements, required for the initial development, should remain in force. Requests were also made by the public to provide a center turn lane on 72nd Avenue. It is staff's opinion that the traffic volumes on 72nd Avenue with the added theater traffic do not warrant such a turn lane as a condition of development. c. The new theatre structure will not substantially increase the stormwater runoff from the site since the existing paved area is being replaced with the roof area. Therefore the downstream impact is negligible and no modifications to the existing system are required. The State Highway Division indicates that the impacts of the added 1,204 seats to the theater complex should be studied for traffic impacts to the street and highway system. The signal modification made at 99W and the theater driveway were made to handle the present complex. The Building Inspection Division, Washington County Fire District No.1, P.G.E. , Metzger Water District, and General Telephone all have no objections to the proposal. No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposed development is consistent with Community Development Code requirements for building height and setback, access, lot coverage, and the intended use. Additional discussion is warranted relating to parking, landscaping and buffering, access and sight distance at 72nd Avenue, traffic generation, and trash pick-up. Landscaping. The conceptual landscaping plan presented in the application appears to meet all code requirements for landscaped area as well as types of vegetation for buffering, screening and parking areas. However, a more detailed plan should be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits which clearly identifies the location, types, and sizes of the landscaping materials and ground cover to be installed. During a recent site visit, the health and adequacy of the existing landscaping was evaluated. The following items must be completed in order to meet Code requirements: 1. The ground cover and netting used for erosion control in the southeastern corner of the site along 72nd Avenue needs to be re-established. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 88-27 - Eastgate Theatre - Page #3 2. The Douglas fir trees that were planted along the rear of the existing building to provide screening have died and need to be replaced. 3. The majority of the southern landscaped area as well as the areas bordering the parking lot contain blackberries and other weeds. This constitutes "noxious vegetation" as defined in the Tigard Municipal Code and must be removed and replaced with an acceptable ground cover such as turf, bark mulch, or ivy. Parking. The Community Development Code requires that one parking space be provided for every four (4) seats within the cinema complex. Based upon the number of seats, 685 parking spaces are required. The applicant's site plan shows a total of 701 parking spaces and therefore, the Code requirements are satisfied. Also, the appropriate number of additional handicapped parking spaces have been provided. The Code requires that one bicycle parking space be provided for every 15 required vehicular spaces. Thirty-two bicycle spaces were provided in conjunction with the original development of the theater. Because of this expansion, another 14 bicycle parking spaces must be provided. Access and Sight Distance on 72nd Avenue. As noted by the Engineering Division, the sight distance is not adequate at the 72nd Avenue entrance. In order to be consistent with City standards and to provide for safe ingress and egress from the driveway, additional sight distance (consistent with a 35 mph design speed) should be provided. Traffic Impact. The applicant indicates that by proper scheduling of the different shows at the theater complex, the traffic generation will not pose an additional problem. A business owner nearby on Pacific Highway has indicated to the City staff that traffic congestion problems presently exist at peak hour times, such as Saturday evenings. As indicated above by the Engineering Division and State Highway Division, this scheduling plan will be reviewed to ensure that the public street system and nearby properties are not adversely affected. Trash Pick-up. Several complaints have been received regarding the hours of trash removal from the site. In order to maintain a more compatible relationship with the residents to the south, trash pick- up should be limited normal daytime hours. C. DECISION The Planning Director's designee APPROVES SDR 88-27 subject to the following conditions: A SITE WORK AND/OR FOUNDATION PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED BY THE BUILDING DIVISION PRIOR TO THE SATISFYING THE CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 88-27 - Eastgate Theatre - Page #4 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 1. A profile of 72nd Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. The applicant shall reconstruct the crest vertical curve to the future grade and same width as currently exists. Pavement thickness shall be to major collector standards. A vertical curve length equivalent to 40 times the change in grade on either side of the vertical curve shall be used to define the future grade. STAFF CONTACT; Gary Alfson, Phone 639-4171. 2. Seven (7) sets of plan and profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a registered professional civil engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering division for approval. Two (2) sets of plan and profile plans shall be submitted for preliminary review prior to submittal of final plans. STAFF CONTACT; Gary Alfson. 3. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Division has approved public improvement plans. The section will require a 100% performance assurance or letter of commitment, a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. STAFF CONTACT: Jon Feigion, Phone 639-4171. 4. An amended site plan shall be submitted for Planning Division approval which provides for the number of bicycle parking spaces as required by the Community Development Code. The design of the bicycle racks shall also be submitted for approval. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden, Phone 639-4171. 5. An amended landscaping plan shall be submitted for those areas affected by the expansion which indicates the species and size of the landscaping materials to be planted. Also, the plan shall include the treatment of other landscaped areas which presently do not meet Code standards. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden. 6. The theater shall be operated on a schedule which assures that in any 15 minute time period, the total capacity for all performances which are beginning and ending does not exceed 1,020 seats. This schedule shall be approved by the State Highway Division and the City of Tigard Engineering Division. If it is found that this schedule requirement is not attainable, a revised traffic study may be required by the State Highway Division or the City. Any change to this condition shall require a new site development review and may require additional street improvements. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Alfson. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 88-27 - Eastgate Theatre - Page #5 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 7. The landscaping materials shown in the approved landscaping plan noted in Condition 5. above shall be installed. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden. 8. The applicant shall provide an assurance that trash pick up shall only occur between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden. THIS DECISION IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE NOTED BELOW. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owners of record within the required distance _X_The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON June 26, 1989 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. June 26, 1989 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. Wd."1"41.‘" —112/1471F—/ PREPARED BY: Keith S. Liden, DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 88-27 Eastgate Theatre - Page 6 MAR 05 '98 10:52 FROM:STOEL RIVES 5032202480 T-679 P.02/02 F-080 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CINTbit 900 5W YiFTH nVTINIIJE,SUITC 2300 I I LAND,C)RT.C.ON 97214-1268 Puonr(503)22 1.3390 For t6113)220.24Rn TOD(S03)221-1045 lntunut wwwit0el,corn March 4, 1998 MICHAEL C. ROBINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinson®sioel.com VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Dick Bewersdorff Senior Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR. 97223 Re: Meeting to Discuss Act III Dear Dick: I am writing to confirm our meeting scheduled for your office on Friday, March 6 at 9 a.m. The purpose of our meeting is to discuss the transportation impacts of the Tigard Cinema's theater expansion. In summary, we want to use the meeting to explain why a substantial burden imposed on Act III by the improvements to Southwest 72nd Avenue, the dedication or reservation of a major arterial and the same for a backage street across the theater are not proportional to Act III's transportation impacts. Act III's goal is to work with the City so that the City can conclude that roughly proportional impacts do not require the backage and major arterial streets. Act III therefore would construct only the improvements to SW 72nd Avenue, the major arterial in the Tigard Triangle. We look forward to meeting with you on Friday to discus this issue. Very truly yours, NliC e- L I-- Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. Dave Gellows (via facsimile) Mr. Brady Berry (via facsimile) Mr. Mark Vandehay (via facsimile) PDX 1 A-116152.1 999990006 CrYtl r MITT!nNn VAN("Ill rvi WA fkn5ir SALT LLKF.CITY WA0IIINGTUN•D.C. 03/25/1998 17:22 503-684-6622 WEBBER & ASSOCS. ,LLC PAGE 01102 FAXDate 03125,98 Number of a s includin cover sheet 2 TO: Richard Bewersdorff, FROM: John Q. Webber Senior Planner Webber Properties, L.L.C. 12155 S.W. ldwood St. City of Tigard Planning Department Tigard, Oregon 97224- 2919 USA 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Phone (503)-684-6622 Phone 639-4/71 Fax Phone 503 -684-6622 Fax Phone 684-7297 CC: REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ® For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment Please di . t to Mr :ewersdorff for his review. s/ 1 John Weber Post-its Fax Note // 7671 Date -3 an gesi• To :cNae i lO •t♦ Erik afi / • i�J—■ Co./Dept. tee/ V�`�� Co. Yom' 4:i,✓ Phone#-ZZy 3 y'2O Phone# q" Li Fax# 2d—� joy 03/25/1998 17: 22 503-684-6622 WEBBER & ASSOCS. ,LLC PAGE 02/02 ■ Webber Properties, L.L.C. 12155 S.W. Wildwood St.,Tigard, OR 97224-2919 684-6622 March 24, 1998 Richard Bewersdorff, Senior Planner City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard Act 111 Theaters Expansion Proposal Gentlemen: We are the owners of the commercial building located at 11632 S.W. Pacific Highway, which shares the private roadway with Tigard Act III Theaters. Our tenant is the Westside Dance Academy. We attended the neighborhood informational meeting held on February 18, 1998. Act III Theaters has performed responsibly in all previous expansions. We support Act III Theater's proposal, but are concerned that the private roadway is operating beyond capacity. Our objective is to preserve our schools' unrestricted access to the roadway for arrival & departure, and provide for the safety of children and parents. In a 1995 Staff Report, the Tigard Planning Department indicated that the private roadway is already overburdened and very congested, and required that Tri-Met develop the easement to S.W. 72nd Avenue. Regretfully, Tri-Met was successful in avoiding that requirement. Complete blockage of our only property access now regularly occurs at peak hours, negatively affecting our school operations and creating a safety hazard for enrolled children, parents, and staff. We strongly advocate acceptance of Act ID Theater's proposed design to open a minimum of two additional access driveways onto S.W. 72nd Avenue, We believe these added driveways are necessary to reduce the pressure on the private roadway. We respectfully request that Act III Theaters provide additional traffic control on the private roadway. We suggest, for example, a cross-walk with stop signs be installed at the roadway junction of our property access, plus re-striping the roadway lanes to improve northbound traffic flow. Additional signing for slowing and stopping southbound traffic is also recommended. Thank you for your consideration. Please call me if I can be of any assistance. ark incereiy, r,d1 J 4 D. Webber, MD ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS APR-12-99 02:42PM FROM-STOEL RIVEV T-799 P 01/02 F-544 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURn.NCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-1268 Telephone(S03)224-3380 Fm (503)220-2480 Name; Fax No- Company/Firm: Office No. TO: Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Tim Reed 702-254-1465 Regal Cinemas 702-254-1429 Dave Cellos 225-0803 Thompson Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Julia Kuhn 273-8169 Kittelson & Associates Brady Berry 526-0775 W&H Pacific 626-0455 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Mauer: DATE: April 12, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): Originals Nor Forwarded Unless Checked: Firs(Class Mail Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information char is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is nor the imended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify as immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. APR-12-99 02:42PM FROM-STOEL RIVF" T-799 P.02/02 F-544 STOEL RIVES >_>_p ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 5 W FIFTH AVENUE SUITS 2e00 PORTLAND,OAECON 977.04-12611 Plume(5121.124-3380 Fzs 15031220.2480 TDD(5031221-1015 Insemes.www.ascki.com April 12, 1999 MICHAEL C_ROBINSON Direcr Dial (503)294.9194 crud mcrobmson@stocl.com VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Act III Tigard Cinemas Application Dear Julia: Please send me a list of all those agencies to whom you have provided a request for comment on this application. I would also like you to provide, if you have not already done so, a copy of the notice to the Oregon Division of State Lands ("DSL") and the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife ("ODFW"). Please provide me with copies of any written comments that you receive. Very truly yours, M e. Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facsimile) Mr. Allan Norris (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Kuhn(via facsimile) Mr. Brady Berry (via facsimile) Mr. Stephen L. Pfeiffer PD X 1 A-169530.1 99999.0006 Sn..m a V+NG0U"Lk Ww Bosse S•.lr 1,aa CITY WsHINCTON.D C CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OREGON 9)223 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: April 13, 1999 TIME: TO: Michael Robinson PHONE: (503) 224-3380 Stoel Rives LLP Attorneys FAX: (503) 220-2480 Standard Insurance Center 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204-1268 FROM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary PHONE: (503) 639-4171 City of Tigard FAX: (503) 684-7297 Planning Department RE: SDR 98-0025 — COPY OF REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CHECK-OFF RE: AGENCIES NOTIFIED OF THE PROPOSAL. c: SDR 98-0025 Land Use File I Numher of pages Inciuulng cover sheet: 2 Michael, DSL was notified of the proposed Act III Theater Expansion on 4/2/99 along with the other agencies identified on the check-off list. The Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW), however, were not included in this request. Per your request, I am forwarding a copy of the plans and materials for their review today. According to the Tigard Development Code, we have to allow a 14-day period for review, therefore, the comments (if any) from the ODFW will not be due back to our office until 4/27/99. Upon receipt of comments from the agencies notified, you will be forwarded a copy as requested. Please call me if I can be of any further assistance. Thank you. . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CITArea:[CI [El [S] [WI CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS m Place for review In Library Crreeektsl FILENO[SJ: SD1e 98-0025 FILENAMEISI: /q(211/- S-� vxP9ns;.0 •, CITY OFFICES / ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Plann,ng s„P,,.,« COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./iN ,w Svcs Techicons 'POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,a-n.Prevention Officer ,-BUILDING DIV./David Scott,B,angoe,cww hENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,oipm,*Review Eg■neer --WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Odi..Mar,ager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,c.yu.,n.o., OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,property Manage, OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* `�UALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* VTUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT * `UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS . _CITY OF BEAVERTON * CITY OF TUALATIN OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE` R.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager {, 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,Neptrbe i court PO Box 369 k° PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 ..— Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 , PO Box 23483 1--OS ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA's/ZOA's) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200 PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY * King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Punning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration _Brent Curtis(CPA's) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera •'ClLDOT,REGION 1 * _Scott King(cPA'S) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,Dvipmt Rev cone Mike Borreson(engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Jim Tice ncA'S) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Do Portland,OR 97209-4037 Tom Harry(c«rerg Pt.Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALIi" _Phil Healy(Current PI Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _Sr.Cartographer(cprozcA)MS r. Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Pemoi Spectabst 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 000T,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN RJR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS --TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 L''''PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY 'GENERAL TELEPHONE ''US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR03O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 alt - 111101IC*BES AVVOMAX1C 14OII'IFICA8/OM IF WITtfWM FOP' OF Mg,sU6/ECP P&OPC9fl FO& A14r/ALL CffT PSG/CCU. IP&OltCT PLAMMt&IS iitSPOMSSB"LS FO&ImpecAFIN6 PA&YILs to NO!IFY/ hlpatty\mastersvfcnotice.mst 15-Mar-99 04/13/99 11:23 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD x1001 ***:{::{:s;.,}.:F.....f.k.. .F..E..E-.E..f.$.:{..6.i.4..g$h: Y::E: : ACTIVITY REPORT **s TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 4324 CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME 04/13 11:21 USAGE TIME 01'36 PAGES 2 RESULT OK I CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING UIVISIDN 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OREGON 91223 DATE: April 13, 1999 TIME TO: Michael Robinson FAX: (5a) 220-2480 Stoel Rives LLP Attorneys Standard Insurance Center 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204-1268 FnoM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary PHONE: (503) 634-4171 City of Tigard Planning Department RE SDR 98-0 S 5 — COPY IED OF REQUEST EST FOR PROPOSAL. CHECK-OFF RE AGENCIES SDR 98-0025 Land Use File T m er o pa BS nc tg ves e Z Community(Development ShapingA Better Community CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OREGON 91223 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: April 21, 1999 TIME: TO: Michael Robinson Phone: 503-224-3380 Stoel Rives LLP Attorneys FAX: 503-220-2480 Standard Insurance Center 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204-1268 FROM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary PHONE: 503-639-4171 City of Tigard FAX: 503-684-7297 Planning Division RE: SDR 98-0025 — Request for copies of returned "REQUEST FOR COMMENTS" C: SDR 98-0025 Land Use File Number of pages including cover sheet: 5 Michael, Pre your request, here are the Comments received from various agencies, etc. in regard to the ACT III Theater Expansion project. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you. RECEIVED PLANNING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ' o CITY Ail APR 7 1999 Community KDeve(opment CITY OF TIGARD RECETvEl,k gulping Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 APR 1999 TO: US Army Corps.of Engineers REGULATOR 1 BRANCH FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0026 ACT III THEATER EXPANSION A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223: PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: / 1 JAI of_i.e i I �... Q �L'/!�. Ad./ �i.��% / �._• �� _ 4// J Ai r- ■ • ► �IA 1)-0--- 0, 11 1, ' ' /J • Atom. /e ,/ ,ko 60/-E C�a • '_)Y Q.f2-}C *ease provizfe thtefoamwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: r I Phone Numher(sl: e'1 V f 3 '5� I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNIOgnmunity Devetvpment Shaping Better Community DATE: April 2,1999 APR 1 4 1999 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0026 ➢ ACT III THEATER EXPANSION < A request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing 11 screen theater to provide an additional 6 screens. Because the existing 11 theaters will be remodeled as well, the proposal will result in an addition of only 315 seats. LOCATION: The subject property includes several tax lots that are located west of SW 72nd, south of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Dartmouth. The site has frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. The site is also identified as; WCTM 1S136DC, Tax Lot 00500 and 1S136DB, Tax Lots 02600 and 02602. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. The site is also located in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters in effect prior to November 26, 1998: 18.32, 18.62, 18.67, 18.84, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.132, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL13,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. 7' Written comments provided below: sE �► Nt caNAS b‘ Boss bV- ILA °A d► `tk (Please provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: a . ' o\ x aa0 MEMORANDUM Ad CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON `')I RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Julia Powell Hajduk APR 12 1999 FROM: Bob Poskin CITY OF TIGARD DATE: April 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Site Development review, Act III Theater Expansion Accessibility -OSSC, Chapter 11 Accessible Parking— ORS 447-223, requires 17 Spaces. Site plan shows 14 — Stalls on the NE Side require curb ramps. The accessible route from the building to the public way, where the driveway access occurs provide curb ramps at the beginning and end as well as tactile warnings. Fire—UFC, Chapter 9 and Appendix A-111-A-1 & TVFD Ordinance Provide three(3)hydrants with 250 feet of all portions of the proposed construction. See attached drawing for required location. Please note, if they feel the placement requirement cannot be accomplished, then an access road at the back of the buildings will be required 15 feet back from the face of the building, and the third hydrant will still be required. Storm Sewer—OSPC Chapter 11, section 1108 and table 11-2 Sizing of all storm drainage piping shall be hydrodynamic calculated by an Oregon licensed engineer. Geo-Tech A soil strength loss report and liquefaction potential study will be required. Water Supply The project is in the Tualatin Valley Water district. Applicant should contact Gary Pippen or Stu Davis—642-1511 for their comments. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLTI/AN cis,DI TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON DocC #PP0417 CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION TRI-MET PORTLAND,OREGON STREET 7232 April 13, 1999 Julia Powell Hajduk City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 98-0026 - Act III Theater Expansion— City of Tigard Dear Ms. Hajduk: Tri-Met welcomes the opportunity to comment on this proposal to expand the Tigard Cinemas near the intersection of SW 72`d Avenue and SW Pacific Highway in Tigard. The area is served by Tri-Met lines 12, 64X and 95X and the site is adjacent to Tri-Met's Tigard Park & Ride lot. The purpose of our recommendations is to minimize the traffic impacts of new development by encouraging development patterns that are transit, bicycle, and pedestrian supportive. Improved pedestrian access and connection promotes walking and reduces local dependence on automobiles. TRI-MET STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Provide sidewalks along the new entry driveway and extend the driveway and sidewalk to the western property line. This will help to facilitate a connection to SW Atlanta Street. Sidewalks also help to facilitate on-site circulation and provide access to the primary pedestrian network. Improved access and connection, along with the separation of pedestrian and automobile traffic, will encourage more people to walk or use transit as a travel option. Sueb pathways reduce the travel distance to local destinations and support the state's Transportation Planning Rule. Provide a direct, delineated pedestrian pathway that connects the new parking lot with the building entrance. A well-defined pathway through the parking area helps to facilitate safe on-site circulation through the separation of pedestrian and automobile traffic The applicant should contact Tri-Met to negotiate modifications to the existing shared use agreement prior to city approval. A shared use agreement exists between Act 1I1 and Tri-Met for the use and maintenance of the Park and Ride lot adjacent to the Cinema site. Due to the potential impacts, and the potential for additional shared use opportunities, it is necessary that the current agreement be modified to reflect the proposed changes. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 239-2102. Sincerely, iegozii) Michael Kiser, Pr ' et Planner (503)238-RIDE • TTY 238-5811 -http://www.trl-rnet.org k:\r ojplantphit-h1 conmments\0413aQl.doe 20:391dd L6,71 t.89 90S:01 T822-622-205 iN3Wd013n3a ID3f0ZId:WOdd 02:01 66 171-ddti 04/21/99 12:29 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD I ]O01 f £ h::f:$:£ .$**j.kk•f•.f•d f f f.f f fd•:• **s ACTIVITY REPORT :I::f::£: £ £ f £ £ £ f £.f £ £.ffff £ f £ fff £ ff £ f £ • TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 4625 CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME 04/21 12:27 USAGE TIME 02'35 PAGES 5 RESULT OK LOMmumty rDCL'CCOpnu'nt Shaping A Better Community CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OREGON 91223 BATE: April 21, 1999 nME TO: Michael Robinson Phu: 503-224-3380 Stoel Rives LLP Attorneys FAX: 503-220-2480 Standard insurance Center 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204-1268 FIOM: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary PHONE 503-639-4171 City of Tigard FAX: 503-684-7297 Planning Division RE SDR 98-0025— Request for copies of returned "REQUEST FOR COMMENTS" C: SDR 98-0025 Land Use File Number of pages including cover sneer 5 :4-22-99 03:56PM FROM- T-876 P 01/03 F-270 STOEL RIVES I.L.P ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-1268 Telephone (503)224.3380 Fax (503)220-2480 Name: Fax No. Company/Firm: Office No. TO: Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Tim Reed 702-254-1465 Regal Cinemas 702-254-1429 Dave Cellos 225-0803 Thompson Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Dick Bewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Jim Coleman 243-2944 Ramis Crew 222-4402 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294.9194 Client: Matter: DATE: April 22, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: First Class Mail Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is nor the intended recipient or un employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. 34-22-99 03:56PM FROM- T-876 P 02/03 F-270 STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD IN9L R-.NCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE 2600 PORTLAND.OREGON 97203-1268 Phone(503)224.3330 En(503)220.2480 TDD 15031221-1045 ltitemCS:www stoei.cam April 21, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinsonmstoel.com VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard Cinemas Application Dear Julia: Thank you for calling me about this application. I also want to confirm some information that may help you to resolve some of the issues. Exhibit 11 to the March 10, 1999 submittal contains two pages. The second page shows that even if all of the parking in the street corridors is removed, the theaters will still have 940 parking spaces, exceeding the 830 required parking spaces. I appreciate your advising me of the Corps' comment. I want to refer you to pages 13 and 17 of the application. Page 13 addresses Tigard Community Development Code ("TCDC") Chapter 18.84, "Sensitive Lands." The application states, in part: "This application does not propose any land form alterations to the wetland." Page 17 addresses TCDC section 18.120.180(A)(2). The application states, in part "The natural drainage ditch will be protected in its existing condition. A pedestrian bridge will cross the natural drainage course." As you know, this application was submitted prior to the adoption of the new TCDC on November 26, 1998 and may complete within 180 days of its submittal. Therefore, the old TCDC provisions apply to this application. PDX 1 A.I10923.1 99999-0006 SE..TTLR PORTLAND VwNCOUVBR,WA 501.E SALT LACE Cr,I WA5t1INGTON,D.C. • '04-22-99 03:5TPM FROM- 7-876 P.03/03 F-270 STOEL RIVES LLP Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner April 21, 1999 Page 2 If you receive any additional written comments, please forward them to me. Very truly yours, tiklje. g.,f4.A.,... Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. Alan Norris (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facsimile) Mr. Dick Bewersdorff(via facsimile) Mr. Jim Coleman (via facsimile) PDX1A-170923,1 999990006 05-05-99 02:57PM FROM- T-570 P.01/03 F-792 STOEL RIVES A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 92204-1268 Telephone(503)224-3380 Far(503)220-2480 Name: Fax No. Company/Firm: Office No. TO: Jan Stewart 808-4375 Corps of Engineers Tim Reed 702-254-1465 Regal Cinemas 702-254-1429 John Roper 423-925-9754 423-922-1123 Herbert Sanger 423-524-5731 Wagner Myers & Sanger 423-525-4600 Brady Berry 526-0775 W&H Pacific 626-0455 Dave Gellos AND 225-0803 Thompson Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Dick Bewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 rciient: Matter: DATE: May 5, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: First Class Mail fl Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. 05-05-99 02:57PM FROM- T-570 P 02/03 F-792 STOEL RIVES LL A T T O R N E N S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH,VENUE.SUITE 2600 PORTLAND.OREGON 972M-t26R Pho, (503)224.33$0 (503)22 6.24,50 TOO(503)222-1045 tn:emee.�n,v'W.sloc1.COT May 4, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direcr Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinsoiastoel.com VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Jan Stewart Corps of Engineers PO Box 2948 Portland, OR 97208-2946 Re: Your Comments to City of Tigard Regarding Regal Cinemas Application Dear Ms. Stewart: This office represents Regal Cinemas in its land use application pending before the City of Tigard. I have reviewed your comments to Julia Hajduk regarding this application. I am writing to request that you provide me the authority for your determination that a 50-foot buffer adjacent to wetlands be provided. The Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County requires only a 25-foot buffer. Moreover, my client proposes no changes to the channel. If you review the site plan carefully, you will see that on the south side, the City already retains a dedicated 25 foot wide right-of-way which is currently undeveloped. On the north side of the channel, my client proposes to add a new parking lot with a setback satisfying the Unified Sewerage Agency's requirement. My client will obtain whatever 401 permits are required for a minimal amount of filling near the channel's intersection with Southwest 72' Avenue. However, my client does not plan to do anything else to the channel as it exists on the property today. PDX 1 A-172204.I 9999g-COX SE.'TLF POit1 LAND \'ANCO.A ER,WA BONE SALT LAKI.CFI tti ASHINCTDh.DC • 05-05-99 02:5BPM FROM- T-5T0 P.03/03 F-T92 STOEL RIVES «r. Ms. Jan Stewart May 4, 1999 Page 2 Please call me at 294-9194 is you would like to discuss this matter further. Very truly yours, LQ Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. John Roper (via facsimile) Mr. Herbert S. Sanger, Jr. (via facsimile) Mr. Brady Barry (via facsimile) Mr. Allan Norris (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facsimile) Mr. Dick Bewersdorff(via facsimile) Ms. Julia Hajduk (via facsimile) Mr. Frank Flynn Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer PDX1A-172204.1 99999.0006 PAY-05-39 02:31PM FROM-STOEL RIVES 503-220-2480 T-838 P.O1/04 F-706 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE 2o00 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-12b8 Telephon. (503)224-3380 Fax(503)220-2880 Name: Fax No. Company/Firm: Office No. TO: Dean M. Phillips 239-6776 Tri-Met Mike Kiser 239-6755 Dick Bewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 John Roper 423-925-9754 423-922-1123 Herbert Sanger 423-524-5731 Wagner Myers & Sanger 423-525-4600 Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (S03) 294-9194 Client: Matter: DATE: May 5, 1999 4 No. of Pages (including this cover): Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: First Class Mail Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege_ If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify as im rlediatcly by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail_ Thank you_ COMMENTS: PAY-05-88 02:32P�1 FROM-STOEL RIVES 503-220-2480 T-838 P 02/04 F-706 STOEL RIVES IAA) A T T O R N E Y S STANDAKD INSURnNCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE:IWO PORTLAND,ORECON 9720.-1368 Pgarse(5031224-3380 Fas(503)22.-2480 TDD($031 ZZ1-y0I5 In[enwr www.anw.4 com May 4, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direr:Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinsonasiocl.corn VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Dean Phillips Tri-Met 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97232 Re: My Client, Regal Cinemas; City of Tigard File Nos. SDR 9$-0026 Tigard Cinemas expansion application Dear Dean: I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation on April 22. Please find enclosed a copy of Mike Kaiser's April 13, 1999 comment to the City of Tigard. His third comment suggests that the shared use agreement between Regal Cinemas and Tri-Met should be renegotiated. When I spoke with Mike, he said that his comments were primarily related to the potential impact of traffic through the Tri-Met parking lot to reach my client's new parking lot located between the Tri-Met parking lot and Southwest 72g4 Avenue. I have included a site plan for your review. You indicated that your primary concern was whether my client would attempt to abrogate the agreement_ My client does not intend to abrogate the agreement. I would like to meet with you and Mike to discuss the easement agreement. Once we have our meeting, I would like Mike to send a new comment CO the city regarding the agreement_ PDX IA-1722236.1 99999.00 35 S6wTTLF POYTL+.w V.44Ca1. LA WA 60l5[ S.LT L..AY CTII k+anL\CTO>,OC. lAY-05-99 02:32PM FROM-STOEL 503-220-2480 T-838 P 03/04 F-706 STOEL RIVES 4.1. Mr. Dean Phillips May 4, 1999 Page 2 Would you please call me so we can discuss this matter further? Very tuly yours, MJLQ Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc Enclosure cc: Mr. Dick Bewersdorff(via facsimile) (w/o encl.) Mr. John Roper (via facsimile) (w/encl.) Mr. Herbert S. Sanger, Jr. (via facsimile) (w/encl.) Ms. Julia Hajduk (via facsimile) (w/o encl.) Mr. Michael Kiser (via facsimile) (w/oencl.) PDX I A-1 .236 1 4J9991X06 � 503-220-2480 T-838 P 04/04 F-706 MAY-05-99 02:33PM FROM-STOEL RIVF �ruua/ppb TR"' 'OR'''tci of OREGC*4 DexC 1aPP04I7 •r CaPftet PoGiiCti i FwCalfEs T7nictOW a 710 N.R HOLI AD4sr STREET PORTt srd.1 OREGON 1T7292 April 13, 1999 Juba Powell Hsjdul< City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE:SDR 93--0076-Act III Theater Expansion City of Tigard Dear Ms.Hajduk: ni-Met welcomes the importunity to corn/mat on this proposal to expand the Timed Calcines tsar the intersection af SW 72°'Aversive and SW Pacibc Higdtwy in Tigard_ The area is served by Tri-Mat liars IL 64X and 95X and the site is adjacent to Tri-Ma's Tigard Park&Ride lot The purpose of our recommendations is to ttununize the ttaf5c impacts of new devdoprrtatt by ettcousaeiag development parerras that are transit. bicycle_ and pedestrian supportive. lugarav,d pedestrian access and connention promotes walking:nd reduces local dependence co automobiles. SET_STAFFRECQ/KKIENPATI O1IS Provide sidewalks ;IanY the new entry driveway and extend the driveway and sidewalk to the vrestarn property bee. This will help to taodnats a connection to SW Atlanta Strut_ Sidewalks also help to facilitate, oat- itc circulation arid provide access to t c primary pedestrian ironwork. Improved access and connection, along with the separation of pcdcsuiaa and automobile traffic, win caca,mac more people tc.walk or use transit as a travel option. Sigh pathways redoes the travel disancs to local destinations and support tic saw's Traa►spormtion Planting Rule. Provide a direct. delineated pedestrian pathway that connects the new paddag lot with the building entrance A wall-defend pathway through the parking area bclpa to facilitate oft on-site circulation through the scparat on of pedestrian and auteesnabile traffic The applicant should contact Tri-Met to negotiate modifications to the existing shared use agreerr+eit prior to city approval A shtrad lase agrocrnent rains s betwsett Act!D and'hi-Met for the uSe and Maintepanca of the Park and Ride let adjacent to the Clnwta airs'- Doe to the ptxartial impacts, and the potential for additional shared use apporaaoition, it is oessasary that the current agreement be modified to reflect the proposed changes. Again, thank you for the opportunity to cornering on this proposal. If you have soy questions, please contact me at 239-2102. Sincerely, 4:144(,) Michel Kiser, Plarnser (scm)ass. E-fl zas-sat 1 -rttKi/r•....r.v nel. g 1....vi uarorr7-lesaroms,ealwt36cO.isr 2Er3zxd Lb24 b89 EBS=01 If:EE-6E2-2M 1rC3i1313l 133113bdrl.Qil3 02:01 E6 VI-dd0 65-05-99 02:58PM FROM- T-570 P 01/03 F-794 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTOa4 >: x s STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-1:68 Telephone(503)224-3380 Far (5031 220-2480 Name: Fax No. _ Company/Firm:- Office No. TO: Dick Bewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Tim Reed 702-254-1465 Regal Cinemas 702-254-1429 John Roper 423-925-9754 423-922-1123 Herbert Sanger 423-524-5731 Wagner Myers & Sanger 423-525-4600 Brady Berry 526-0775 W&H Pacific 626-0455 Dave Cellos AND 225-0803 Thompson Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Jack Orchard 295-1058 Ball Janik 228-2525 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: - _ FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Matter: _ DATE: May 5, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): 5 Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: [ H First Class Mail `-1 Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work proauct privilege. If the reader of this message is nor the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do nor distribute Ihis facsimile, notify us immediately by Telephone, and re(Urn this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. - i5-05-9g 02:58PM FROM- T-570 P 02/03 F-794 STOEL RIVES LL F' A T TORN E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 5' FIFTH AS ENCE.SLTTE 2600 PORTLAND.OREGON 972D4-12nn Pnow 1303, 24-33.50 Fax(31.131220-2480 TOO 1543)z.21-1a is Internet.WWW stoel cons May 5, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direcr Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinson®siocl.com VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Dick Bewersdorff City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File Nos. CPA 98-0004, et al; Babies "R" Us Application Dear Dick: This law firm office represents Regal Cinemas. As you know, Regal operates the Tigard Cinemas to the west of this property. As you know, Regal Cinemas has proposed to install the traffic signal at SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street, if its application is approved, as long as the City imposed requirements on other applications that they reimburse Regal for their proportional share of the traffic signal if Regal installs the signal. I have spoken with Jack Orchard representing Babies "R" Us. Jack has told me that his client will agree to reimburse Regal for its proportional share of traffic through the intersection. Jack and I need to prepare an agreement between our respective clients. However, I am writing you to request this be a condition of approval on the Babies "R" Us application. I see nothing inconsistent with this condition and my discussion with Mr. Orchard. PDX I A-173000.1 99999.04f16 SETTLE PQRTL.ND S'..nCOtP ES.WA SDI,L SALT LAM.0117 LVAsmiNcTo-1,D C 95-05-99 02:59PM FROM- T-570 P.03/03 F-794 STOEL RIVES I.Lr Mr. Dick Bewersdorff May 5, 1999 Page 2 Please see that this letter is placed before the Tigard City Council at its May 11, 1999 public hearing. Very truly yours, gati c. Michael C. Robinson • MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Reed (via facsimile) Mr. John Roper (via facsimile) Mr. Herbert S. Sanger, Jr. (via facsimile) Mr. Allan Norris (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facsimile) Mr. Brady Berry (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Kuhn (via facsimile) Mr. Jack Orchard (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer PDx1A-173030.1 99999.0006 T-T4T P.01/02 F-BBB 110-07-99 11:16AM FROM-STOEL RIVE° STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE 2300 PORTLAND.OREGON 91204-1260 Tdephu4e(503)234-3380 Fax(5443)220-2480 —. Name: Fax No. Company /Firm: – X Office No. TO: Dick Bewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Tim Ramis 243-2944 Ramis Crew 222-4402 Name: Sender's Direct Dial! FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Matter: V DATE: May 7, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): 2_ Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checkcd: First Class Mail j j Overnight Delivery I ; Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by.nail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. PDX1A-1 44974 1 99999-01.01 hlAY-07-99 11:16AM FROM-STOEL RIVES T-747 P 02/02 F-899 STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E x S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 9OP SW HFTH AVENUE STATE 2000 PORTLAND.ORECON 97204-12.s6 Ywnt(SO3122i-3380 Fa,(5( 22U-4u TDD 6(13)221.7 a.& Intesnc N{+w s;gcl cull May 7, 1999 MICHAEL C. ROBINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinson4stocl.com VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Dick Bewersdorff City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hail Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Act III Application; City of Tigard File No. SDR 98-0025 Dear Dick: The 120-day clock for this application began to run on March 11, 1999 when I delivered the information that made the application complete pursuant to the City's December 11, 1998 notice of incompleteness. This letter extends the 120-day clock by 60 days inclusive. The extension to the 120-day clock is expressly condition upon our agreement that the City will nor proceed to deny this application until the applicant has an opportunity to work with the City Attorney's office to identify the outstanding issues and resolve those issues. I understand that you were in agreement with this concept based on telephone conversation earlier this morning. Very truly yours, _ Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Tim Ramis (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer PI: AA-1736011 99999-4056 SS.TTE Yo¢RArO V, COuvEC W.7 BoEE SALT LW,.CITE U C 06-01-99 05:31PM FROM-STOEL RIVES PDX 5032202480 T-015 P 01/02 F-770 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2300 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-1268 Telephone (503)224-3380 Fax (503)220-2480 Name; Fax No. Company/Firm: Office No. TO: Dick Bewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 James Hendryx Julia Hajduk Name: Sender's Direct Dial: Y FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Mader: DATE: May 28, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): z Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: 77 First Class Mail Overnight Delivery 1 Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is prorecred by the anorney-client or work product privilege. If The reader of tins message is nor the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you COMMENTS: Please see attached. PDX I A-144974.1 99999-0001 08-01-33 05:31PM FROM-STOEL RIVES PDX 5032202480 T-015 P 02/02 F-770 STOEL RIVES L1-P A T T O R N E Y S STANDHRD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW Fo m AVENUE,SUITE 26DD PORTLAND,OREGON 47:U4-1269 Phone(S03)224-330 Fax(5(13)220.2450 TM)(503)222.3045 Inmemec:ws.+r.>ocicom June 1, 1999 MICHAEL C.RoHINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email rncrobinsorK s[oel.com VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Dick Bewersdorff City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Eastgate Theatres, Inc.; Tigard Cinemas Application Dear Dick: I am writing to confirm two matters. First, with the extension of the 120- day clock that the applicant granted on May 7, 1999, we have until about the first week in July to resolve this matter. If you disagree with this statement, please can me immediately. Secondly, the collector street issue appears to be the only issue that we need to resolve in order to receive approval. The Director has agreed not to require the "backage road." Your voicemail to me stated that the City was prepared to approve the application if this issue can be resolved. As you know, with resolution of this issue, the City can find that the other Tigard Triangle Design Guidelines are satisfied. Very truly yours, Plvie2j1 C- Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Jim Hendryx (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Hajduk (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer PDX1A•175940.1 99999.0006 SEaTTLR PORTLAND VANCOUVER,WA BOISE SALT LAXe Crri WasHrNC oN,D,C. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN t ic.%) TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON DocC # PPO549 CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION TRI-MET PORTLAND,OREGON STREET 7232 June 9, 1999 Julia Powell Hajduk City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 98-0026—ACT III THEATER EXPANSION—CITY OF TIGARD Dear Ms. Hajduk: This letter is in reference to Tri-Met's April 13, 1999 comments on this project. Since our last correspondence, we have met with a representative for Regal Cinemas in order to discuss any issues regarding the theater expansion. As a result, Tri-Met's concerns have been resolved, and no "conditions of approval" are necessary relating to the issues raised by Tri-Met. Thank you for your previous consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me at 962-2102. 2::: sen, ojn:er cc: Michael Robinson, Stoel Rives LLP (503)238-RIDE •TTY 238-5811 • http://www.tri-met.org document7 JUN-09-99 01:3BPM FROM-STOEL RIVES T-917 P.01/04 F-375 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2300 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-1268 Telephone(503)224-3380 Fay(503)220-2480 TO: Name: -- -- Fax No. Company/Firm: --- Office No._Julia Hajduh 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Herbert Sanger 423-524-5731 Wagner Myers & Sanger 423-525-4600 John Roper 423-925-9754 423-922-1123 Dave Cellos AND 225-0803 Thompson Vaivoda 220-0668 Allan Norris Julia Kuhn 273-8169 Kittelson & Associates Brady Berry 526-0775 W&H Pacific 626-0455 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Matter: DATE: June 9, 1999 - - No. Of Pages (including this cover): Originals No Forwarded Unless Cecicrd: Firs[Class Mall L 1 Overnight Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at(503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. !f the reader of this message is nor the intended recipient or an employee responsibic for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute thus facsimile, notify u s immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: See attached. Porllnd 1-1170405.1 W77.1))WW1 JUN-09-98 01:38PM FROM-STOEL RIVE° T-817 P.02/04 F-375 STOEL RIVES LLY A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 EW FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE 2epu PORTLANP.OREGON 97204-I:ea Plunk(503)22x•33$0 Fax tSUf)22L-2sau TDD(303)221-1095 Intcmet:... W mud 1 con June 9, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Dial (S03)294-9194 cmaU mcrobinson®slcel_com VIA FACSIMILE Ms- Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 Re: City of Tigard File No. SDR 98-0026; Tigard Cinemas Dear Julia: I am writing to respond to the written comments that you have provided to me concerning this application. If you have received any additional comments, please provide them to me. 1. Tri-Met Comment. Tri-Met had three (3) comments on this application. First, Tri-Met indicated that sidewalks should be provided along the new entry driveway and requested an extension of the driveway and sidewalk to the west property line. Exhibit 2 to the March 10, 1999 submittal show a driveway connection for the SW Atlanta Street extension across the property. There is no requirement in the Tigard Community Development Code ("TCDC") for an additional sidewalk, although a pedestrian connection will be provided between the theatres, Southwest 72"° Avenue and State Highway 99. The Transportation Planning Rule ("TPR") is not applicable to this application. OAR 660-12-060(1) is not relevant because this application is a permit and does not amend the city's comprehensive plan or its land use regulations. OAR 660-12-045(3)-(5) have been Ponla4t-1172237.1 CW9999-40006 SE TILE YORTL,ND 'ANCOWER WA Soot Snl7 L.j Cat WnShlNCTON.D C JUN-09-99 01:39PM FROM-STOEL RIVE' T-917 P.03/04 F-375 STOEL RIVES LLP Ms. Julia Hajduk June 9, 1999 Page 2 satisfied by prior amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code and the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Secondly, Tri-Met asked for a direct, delineated pedestrian walkway that connects the new parking lot with the building entrance. No such requirement exists in the TCDC. Finally, Tri-Met said it would be necessary to modify the current shared access agreement. I have spoken with Dean Phillips, counsel for Tri-Met, about this issue. I believe that we will be able to address any concerns that Tri-met has about the shared access agreement. 2. Tigard Police Department April 2, 1999 Comment. The Tigard Police Department requested a lighting plan for the new parking lot and additional security lighting on the building. The applicant's architect has told me that it is possible to satisfy these requests. 1 will confirm this with the applicant and confirm in writing if the applicant will commit to these improvements. 3. April 5, 1999 Comment by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("COE"). The COE comment said that the project will require a 404 permit. A 404 permit is required for wetland fill. The project engineers, W&H Pacific, will apply for the necessary permit. The applicant proposes to fill a minimal amount of wetland adjacent to Southwest 72`° Avenue. The COE also requested a wetland delineation. The applicant will provide the delineation. Finally, the COE stated that it will require a 50-foot buffer along the creek. The COE has no legal basis for such a buffer. The applicant will comply with the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County's requirement for 25-foot buffer adjacent to the creek. I request that the city not impose a 50-foot buffer requirement when there is no such requirement in any applicable law. It is clear that the COE is attempting to implement Title 3 before its effective date. Pon1041-1172237 1 0099999.00006 JUN-09-99 01:39PM FROM-STOEL RIVP T-917 P.04/04 F-375 STOEL RIVES LLP Ms. Julia Hajduk June 9, 1999 Page 3 Please call me regarding these comments. 1 want to make sure that inappropriate comments are not imposed as a condition of approval. Very truly yours, c Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Herbert S. Sanger, Jr. (via facsimile) Mr_ John Roper (via facsimile) Mr_ Allan Norris (via facsimile) Ms. David Gellos (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Kuhn (via facsimile) Mr. Brady Berry (via facsimile) Porslna 1-1172237.1 1099499-00U06 JUN-10 99 15:34 FROM:PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 503-239-2281 T0:503 684 7297 PAGE:01 TPI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN DocC#: TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION 710 NE HOLLADAY STREET TRI-MET PORTLAND.OREGON 97232 FAX COVER PAGE DATE: June 10, 1999 NO. OF PAGES (including cover)2 TO: Julia Powell Hajduk COMPANY: City of Tigard FAX NO.: 6841297 FROM: Michael Kiser PHONE: 962.2102 FAX NO.: 962.2281 COMMENTS: ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WILL FOLLOW: X Yes No If this fax is incomplete please call(Karmen)at(962.21421 document8 06/10/99 JUN-10 99 15:34 FROM:PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 503-239-2281 TO:503 684 7297 PAGE:02 (1111‘ TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON DocC # PP0549 CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION 710 ME,HOLLADAY STREET TRI-MET PORTLAND,OREGON 97232 June 9, 1999 Julia Powell Hajduk City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard. OR 97223 RE: SDR 98-0026 —ACT III THEATER EXPANSION — CITY OF TIGARD Dear Ms. Hajduk: This letter is in reference to Tri-Met's April13, 1999 comments on this project. Since our last correspondence. we have met with a representative for Regal Cinemas in order to discuss any issues regarding the theater expansion. As a result, Tri-Met's concerns have been resolved, and no "conditions of approval" are necessary relating to the issues raised by Tri-Met. Thank you for your previous consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me at 962-2102. 2::: sipon:er cc: Michael Robinson, Stoel Rives LLP (503)238-RIDE • TTY 238-5811 • htip://wwwiri-rnet.org document? SUL-02-99 03:06PM FROM-STOEL RIVES T-591 P.01/02 F-404 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 90Q SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2300 PORTLAND.OREGON JT30a-1248 TrkpIOae(503)224-3380 Fur(503)220-2480 Name: Fax No Company/Firm: .� Office No. TO: Dick Rewersdorff 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Julia Hajduk Name: Sender's Direct Dial: - FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 LClient: Matter: — DATE: July 2, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): 2 Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: 7 First Class Mail l J Overnight Delivery I Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected p by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this rnessage is nor the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile_ notify us irrunediaiely by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. — --- PinIn41-1144974 1 (X1999994300 01 T-591 P.02/02 F-404 3UL-02-99 03:06PM FROM-STOEL RIVET STOEL RIVES L>_P A T 'r O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE SUITE 2600 PORTLAND OKECON 7I21.4-12b Phone OOP 2243380 Fax(5031220-2W TDD f503)221.309S Inivatac~Fe • July 2, 1999 MIC»4E1.C.ROBINSON D1rca Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobrnso>asoel.com VIA FACSIMILE Mr. Dick Bewersdorff Ciry of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard Cinemas Application Dear Dick: This office represents Regal Cinemas, the applicant for the Tigard Cinemas site development review application. My client has authorized me to extend the 120-day clock in ORS 227.178(1). This should defer decision by the City until approximately September 1, 1999. Would you please confirm in writing your receipt of this letter and that a decision will not be rendered until September 1, 1999 at the earliest? Very truly yours, ),414.4 e• Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Ms. Julia Hajdulc (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer Pant(41-2003685.1 CO999994=6 ssern.1 Poxfl..NU v r000wrt W* 6o{Sa SALT LAAE Cn WASIKr■CION.D C JUL-09-99 03:56PM FROM-STOEL RIVES 503-220-2480 T-990 P 01/02 F-683 STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE 2300 PORTLAND.OREGON 97203-1268 Telephone(50.)224.3380 Fri (503)220-2480 TO: Name: Fax No_ _ _ Company/firm: _ Office No_ Julia Haj duk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Matter: DATE: July 9, 1999 No. Of Pages (including this cover). Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: First Class Mail fl Overnight Delivery ! Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do nor distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: See attached. PDX 1 A-1704Q5 1 99994.0001 JUL-09-99 03:56PM FROM-STOEL RIVES 503-220-2480 T-990 P.02/02 F-683 STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 Sw FIFTH AV ENUE,SUITE 2aoo PORTLAND,ORECON 972O,-1268 (503)229-3380 ha(S03)220-2480 TDD(503)221-I0e5 Interco July 9, 1999 mIcHAEL.C.RostrlsoN Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinson®stocl.com VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tigard Cinemas Application Dear Julia: I am writing to confirm that the applicant has agreed to extend the 120-day provision in ORS 227.178(1) by sixty (60) clays. Please send me a confirming letter that the City acknowledges and agrees with this extension and that a decision will not be prepared until September 1, 1999 at the earliest. Very truly yours, IALI14,Q e . P.-a-LA-- Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Client (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer PoilndI-2004577 i 0025111.411:C 05 SE.77LE PORTLAND VAHCOuvEP.Nr RO■Au SALT L.r-E CITY NnYt1/r cTo .D C rAil■ CITY OF TIGARD OREGON July 20, 1999 Michael Robinson 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204-1268 Dear Michael: This letter is to confirm that the City acknowledges and agrees with the additional waiver of the 120-day provision. This is the second 60 waiver which means the 120-day clock ends on 11-5-99 (as extended). The City will not prepare a decision on the Tigard Cinemas application until after September 1, 1999. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or the application. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner I:curpin\Julia\sdr\actl I lextlet.doc c: SDR 98-0025 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 08-25-99 03:20PM FROM-STOEL RIVF° PDX T-753 P 01/03 F-526 STOEL RIVES UP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE.SUITE 2600 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201.1268 Telephone(503)224-3380 Far(503)220-2480 Name: Fax No. Company/Firm: _ Office No. TO: Mr. Jim Anderson 229-6945 Army Corps of Engineers 229-5263 Herbert Sanger 423-5245731 Wagner Myers 8 Sanger 423-525-4600 John Roper 423-925-9754 423-922-1123 Dave Gellos 225-0803 Thompson Vaivoda 220-0668 Julia Ha41duk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 Name: Sender's Direct Dial; FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: Matter: j DATE: August 25, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: Li First Class Mail ' Overnight Delivery 1 7 Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is nor the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do nor distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. 06-25-99 03:20PM FROM-STOEL RIVFc PDX T-753 P.02/03 F-526 STOEL RIVES LIP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD ItNNJRANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH4VPNUb.SLRTf 2,ii0 • PORTLAND,ORECON(720i-12„n Phone(52112243380 Fax 603)120-2480 TOD(503)22i-1015 1numct w ww crceLc nn August 25, 1999 MICHAEL C.ROBINSON Direct Dial (503)294-9194 email mcrobinson®stoel-com VIA FACSIMILE Mr- Jim Anderson U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 333 SW 1st Avenue PO Box 2946 Portland, OR 97208-2946 Re: Regal Application to Expand Tigard Cinemas Dear Jim: Thank you for calling me about the Corps' interest in the status of this application. I explained that Ms. Stewart, your predecessor, commented to the City of Tigard on the pending land use application. I responded to Ms. Stewart in a letter that is in your files. The Regal application would install a new parking lot between the existing Tri-Met parking lot and SW 72nd Avenue on the north side of Red Rock Creek. My client understands that it will need to prepare a new wetland delineation to make sure noae of the land use activity is within a jurisdictional wetland. My client would also be conditioned by the City to widen and improve SW 72nd Avenue where it crosses Red Rock Creek over an existing bridge. My client understands that it would need to apply for a fill permit, hopefully a nationwide permit, for all fill associated with this activity. My letter to Jan Stewart commented on the apparent Iack of a eonnection between a fill permit for the bridge and required 50-foot buffers. Should this project go forward and should the Corps have a different comment, it would be helpful to provide this comment to Ms. Hajduk, the City of Tigard planner assigned to this project. Ponladl-2009284.1 0025180-01M- - SEATTIA PORTL..NP VAnICOUVRI{ WA 801.n ;,uT LAFr C17t W., ,NrTON,D.0 08-25-99 03:21PM FROM—STOEL RIVMe PDX T-753 P.03/03 F-526 STOEL RIVES 1,I. Mr. Jim Anderson August 25, 1999 Page 2 Thank you for you interest in this project. If you have further questions, please call me. Very truly yours, M ;. c. PeL“ Michael C. Robinson MCR:ipc cc: Mr. Herbert S. Sanger, Jr. (via facsimile) Mr. John Roper (via facsimile) Mr. David Gellos (via facsimile) Ms. Julia Hajduk (via facsimile) • Porilndl-2009284.1 U025180-00006 , T-556 P.01/02 F-664 AUG-26-99 04:05PM FROM-STOEL RIVFq • STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2300 PORTLAND,OREGON 91204-1268 Telephone(503)224-3380 Far(503)2204480 _TO: Name: _ Fax No.—_ Company/firm; __ _ Office No_ _ Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 John Roper 423-92S-9754 423-922-1123 Herbert Sanger 423-5245731 Wagner Myers & Sanger 423-525-4600 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: _ Matter_ DATE: August 26, 1999 No. Of Pages (including this cover): 2-- Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: LI First Class Mail I 1 Overnight Delivery 7 Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If Mr reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do nor distribute this facsimile, notify la immediately by telephone, and renon this facsimile by mail. Thank you_ COMMENTS: See attached. Formal-1170405.1 0099394-10101 , - AUG-26-99 04:05PM FROM-STOEL RIVES T-556 P.02/02 F-664 g STOEL RIVES LLP -� AT T O x NE Y S SIANDHt:L)IN LRAN(f CB-rER 900 iry FIP HAVfnl uE.SUITE2p1)t1 PuRTL)ND,OkrICON Y72(4-1264 "One(5t ) 2 -3 syO 14 f.1.3)220.348f) Dp(3031221-Iu95 Iruerne&w...r ctOel m it August 26, 1999 MICHAEL C. ROBINSON Direcr Dial (503)294-9194 cmad mcrobin onOswct.com VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Application for Tigard Cinemas Dear Julia: This office represents the applicant, Regal Cinemas. This letter requests an additional 60-day extension of the 120-day provision in ORS 227.178(1). The purpose of this further extension of the 120- day provision is to forestall a negative decision pending additional conversations between Regal and staff_ Please send me a letter confuming the City's acceptance of this extension. Very truly yours, C 3-obLrrarch-4 Michael C. Robinson MCR:kIb cc: Mr. Herbert S. Sanger Jr. (via facsimile) Mr. John Roper (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer PurUI4l-2010215.1 0099099-00301 SkATTLF YuAh..tvu vtk,WA POISe ' t Lr.-L CITY rVnSpIN,..TOs, L AUG-27-8j 04:56PM FROM-STOEL RIVES 503-220-2480 T-428 P.01/02 F-832 STOEL DIVES t,ir A T T O R N S Y S STANDARD INSURANCE CENTER 900 SW FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 2600 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-1268 Teicpia c(503)229-3380 Fax (S03)220-2480 Name: Fax No. CanpaR /Firal: Office No. TO: Julia Hajduk 684-7297 City of Tigard 639-4171 John Roper 423-925-9754 423-922-1123 Herbert Sanger 423-524-5731 Wagner Myers & Sanger 423-S2S-4600 Name: Sender's Direct Dial: FROM: Michael C. Robinson (503) 294-9194 Client: _ ` Matter: --- - -_ DATE: August 27, 1999 No. of Pages (including this cover): Originals Not Forwarded Unless Checked: First Class Mail Li Overmghu Delivery Hand Delivery In case of error call the fax operator at (503) 294-9508. This facsimile may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client or work product privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or un employee responsible for delivering the facsimile, please do not distribute this facsimile, notify us immediately by telephone, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. COMMENTS: Please see attached. AUG-27-99 04:56PM FROM-STOEL RIVEc 503-220-2480 T-428 P.02/02 F-832 STOEL RIVES LLP A T T O R N E Y S STANDARD uRnNCE CENTER 9uo Sw FIFTH nverZue.SutTE�uu Iogri,No.OREGON 9704.124,d Ylw.s<150,227-3360 Fw(103}220 246a MD 1503)221-106 lnrcrner.wwWsrocicom August 27, 1999 M1cHAEL C.Ro81Hs0N Direct Dial (503)294-9194 cmatl mcrobinson®siocl.corn VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Application for Tigard Cinemas Dear Julia: I am writing to confirm that you told me on August 26, 1999 that the City would accept another 60-day extension of the 120-day period. Very truly yours, Michael C. Robinson MCR:klb cc: Mr. Herbert S. Sanger Jr. (via facsimile) Mr. John Roper (via facsimile) Mr. Steven L. Pfeiffer Porondl-2010312.1 0:125180.00U01 $Ilni ILA l'118 11.7Pn v,Nrc,1IVfp:.wA rn15f ]0l_1 LAKE CITY wMarrINCTON.D C d nq w',� CITY OF TIGARD OREGON September 3, 1999 Michael Robinson 900 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204-1268 Dear Michael: This letter is to confirm that the City acknowledges and agrees with the additional waiver of the 120-day provision. This is the third, 60-day waiver which means the 120-day clock ends on 1-4-00 (as extended). Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or the application at (503) 639-4171 ext. 407. Sincerely, iAi// ft-'Powell Hajduk Associate Planner I:curpin\julia\sdr\actl I lextlet2.doc c: SDR 98-0025 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 09/10/99 11 :35 T2503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD l ]001 ; 1 . ACTIVITY REPORT 11 ; ..E..,., ,'. 'y.y.�..3 >1...,.y..f.1,,.....}.. .1..i�.�..{. TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 9020 CONNECTION TEL 5032432944 503 CONNECTION ID CITY ATTORNEY START TIME 09/10 11:35 USAGE TIME 00'37 PAGES 1 RESULT OK AUG-z6-gQ 1:11:05P1.1 FROM-STOEL RIDES T-555 P.a2/D2 F-554 STOOL RIVES L)_P A T T O K K E Y S 3'IANDgiiil 7htiL7 ANLC CEN:E'R 900 iv.FIPI'ra nv[ry VE,SU4TE:eJV PvtriLAND,Or,CON/72Ua-1264 Yr.a,*iw3122i-ayo t�Ia3)2'o14fr I DD(aU3t 2:1.2:41 4 7nterhet, cod cm, August 26, 1999 Post-it'Fax Note 7671 Date a fees [��' T°irf N7i'J From Co./Do _ c /446n14-?, Co. L C ROBINSON # Phone / Dirra Dial Fax# — — X39—y�1�l�TOl (503)291-9194 Fax t cmaiI mrmbin ondssoc[_coin VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Application for Tigard Cinemas Dear Julia: This office represents the applicant, Regal Cinemas_ This letter requests an additional 60-day extension of the 120-day provision in ORS 227.178(1). The purpose of this further extension of the 120-day provision is to forestall a negative decision pending additional conversations between Regal and staff. EGAL CINEMAS November 9, 1999 Ms. Julia Hajduk By Facsimile: 503-684-7297 Associate Planner The City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Theatre Expansion Tigard, Oregon Dear Ms. Hajduk: This is Regal's formal request to the City of Tigard, Oregon, to delay, indefinitely, the decision concerning the expansion of Regal/Act III's Tigard Cinema as represented by the application currently before you. You may expect a follow up letter in the very near future specifying a specific time frame in which a decision will be requested. Thank you for your help and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 4/2401 John Roper Vice President of Development JR:jl REGAL CINEMAS,INC. 7132 COMMERCIAL PARK DRIVE KNOXVILLE,TENNESSEE 37918 (423)922-1123 FAX(423)922-3188 December 18, 2000 . CITY OF TIGARD John Roper OREGON Vice President of Development Regal Cinemas, Inc. 7132 Commercial Park Drive Knoxville, TN 37918 Dear Mr. Roper: The City of Tigard is trying to close out files that have become inactive. The City of Tigard has an open land use case (SDR 98-00025) for an expansion of the Regal Cinemas on Pacific Highway in Tigard. You met with members of the City staff in November of 1999 to discuss the status of this project. At that time, you indicated that the company needed to decide if they wished to move forward with the project and make the changes necessary to the plan to receive an approval. You sent a letter dated November 9, 1999 asking for an indefinite extension and indicated that you would submit a follow-up letter in the "very near future" specifying a specific time frame. Staff has had no contact with anyone in your company since that time. As this project is now over 2 years old and there have been significant code and policy changes, the City has determined that the application must either be processed and a decision issued based on the standards in effect at the time the application was submitted or the application may be withdrawn. As you may recall, there were several issues with the original plans which presented problems in granting an approval. Because of the time that has passed, however, if additional information is submitted or changes are made, staff will likely review this as a significant change which will require a new application to be submitted and the application must comply with the current code standards. Please inform the City in writing no later than 30 days from the date of this letter, what Regal Cinema's intentions are for this project. If we have not heard from you by January 17, 2001 , we will assume that you do not wish to continue with this project and the application will be withdrawn. Please direct inquiries or comments to myself at (503) 639-4171, extension 316. Si ci"—--r A Richard H. Bewersdorff 7 /--------- Planning Manager I:\curpin\julia\Actl I I-Regal.doc c: Jim Hendryx, Bill Monahan, SDR 98-00025 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 titti !rill us The Times ■ TT A2 • January 25, 2001 SDk a ea Til g ex � 99W from the with an 18-inch-thick application file and no ar theater Highway escre still has hopes t department decided last week to shove the They didn t officially Tigard Cinemas. with at the end of the development file and Regal Cinemas Tigard Cinemas file into a corner. it but in our minds it was withdrawn In a Sept. 28 report filed So, city Planning Manager Richard H. din six screens and 300 seats to In Hollywood parlance, the theater's withdraw t , �� with the federal Securities Bewersdorff asked Roper in a De8 ad g e theater, but n planners Con- expansion idea is now just another out-take. because there was no action. and Exchange Commission, 2000,1etter to clarify the company's project, the Regal Cinemas said it—like or the Tigard Cinemas file would 's be - sider it withdrawn But wait—a Regal Cinemas official said last week that the expansion plan could other movie theater compa- ered inactive. "As this project is now over two years By make a comeback. Ju'ia Powell Hajduk, nies—was suffering from an P ] Dick Westerling,senior nge with Regal for overcapacity hangover, old, and there have been significant code the city has determined Of KEVIN HARDEN marketing and aters advertising Knoxville,will Regal Tigard city planner which left it about $1.02 bil- and policy changes,must city either be processed Of the Times lion in debt. Rapid construe that the application be withdrawn," Cinemas' headquarters in oing toig give up o., . . or the application may T IG to expand— d the Cinemas' n year-year said the company six new screens going and 315 seats give up on More than two years ago,Act III Theaters tion of theaters across the country r ulted in . • . ors the apwlicat asked the city for permission to expand and an"oversupply of screens, The city's Jan. 17 deadline for an answer plan to expand the 1 d dr oo tfoor city Avenuemo de theater o Southwest 72nd remodel the Tigard Cinemas theater.A year ness.Regal reported. passed 17 deadline a word from the Cinemas Theater has ran Regal As a result,Regal put the Tigard Cinemas from Regal So, Hajduk said last week, the Even though the company has delayed its or so later,Act III was purchased by g planning department's cutting room floor. Avenue. 1999, company. J City planners aren't exactly editing the g Cinemas of Tennessee, and the Tigard work on a back burner. In a Nov. 9, re for expansion plan, raw g the Tigard theater expansion plan was shuffled around as the letter to city planner Julia Powell o Hajduk, bulky tiv Tigard Cinemas file is headed fort the plan out of the development picture, new company took stock of its purchase. Regal's Vice President P Because the file is still public informa- they've tossed the huge script aside — for is still on the drawing board, Westerling Today, Regal Cinemas owns 414 movie Roper asked the city to"delay,indefinitely," than said. now. "I think it's oust a situation that it's being mum for more note saying the issue was"sort of in limbo," been said. theaters with 4,473 screens in 32 states.The any decision on the Tigard Cinemas expan- tion, the city will keep it in storage, with Regal Cinemas has b y put on hold for the time being, he s P j didn't officially with- could a year expansion whether it project, an to aetuall P good location for us.We company has a virtual lock on the Portland- lion application. ion ro'ein and the large do at is some a very g expand it.We still area movie theater market.A little more than Although Roper promised a follow-up Hajduk said. `They c ul the used for P J space that have a some pns want g to omen a year ago,it built the new 10-screen theater letter outlining the company's leavinlgnther city because but here wasrnominds a cion:was withdrawn Tigard without much is taking ceremony,the sp , in Sherwood, only a few miles south on theater, none ever could be used for the city's active projects. have intentions of doing something at some So,without much ceremony,the planning point?' must do' 'There is more We m Safe wat er group hosts forum Schools: • Continued from Page Al grades, districts like Beaverton, all students successful,but let's cel- Ti ard-Tualatin and Sherwood keep ebrate the fact that Oregon schools BEAVERTON — Citizens for Safe Water Charles D. Scott, Ph.D. g will host a town hall meeting next week Water Citizens for Safe Water is fighting attempts state are ranked as unsatisfactory track of dozens of other factors for are good and getting better" Beaverton to discuss the possible use of the by the Tualatin Valley Water District and (zero to 85), satisfactory (85 to each school to provide parents a Tigard Tualatin schools that Willamette River as drinking water for the other agencies to use the Willamette River for ti pal strong 95 to(90)o 94.9)and excep- broad picture of the district's efforts. increased their ratings this School and Wgion. drinking water. The group is circulating a tional isl to 100). This ac o a large portion of oted Fowler le Sc ochool and group will host the meeting petition to water. a vote before the river can The Tigard g P P both o Legislators years ago the of a their ratings,across said Stan state improved which went eat from School, from 7 Tigard to 9 p.m., Tuesday, host the the meeting be used for drinking of eb. cards two years ago as past w a their ratings,public Stan t Bunn, super-- shr ng." Ratings'for the rest rest of the Beaverton. Center, 5550 S.W. Hall Blvd., For more information, call the organization to rate push to give parents a way intendant of public instruction, p Featured speakers are state Blvd., Gary George, handful dfu their criteria schools applied lied" vn a higher because ce higher test ro out either"satisfactory"or"strong" last Newberg Republican,sat and toxicologist e George, at For more infer lied cveut higher attendance and lower dropout a g handful of criteria app Y g year—remained the same. across the state. School districts use rates. the g rades as another piece of the "The higher ratings in our second incSherw it drating from"sat School information puzzle for area parents. annual report cards reflects higher to "strop giving the district's �/2e �e�eCC ��lentine's �z � Most districts will distribute the test scores, higher attendance and rY" g' g g„ grades in Tax Returns �� i ratings to parents in late February stor ate lower dropout rates?' Bunn said. four schools all "strop g ��{ ' Massage early March. In addition to the state "There is more we must do to make the report cards. Personal and Business g $10 off— 1 hour Swedish $5 off- 1/2 hour z • Fast Refunds Deep Tissue 'I knew immediately what I wanted to do' - t z Sitters. I k • Fast Service (:3-5 Days) - Therapeutic - _ 1. rnmina more commonplace, "One day I was looking through • _. Stress Reduction __ ,,,,,,*,P� and �.___.,. C:Iir1n - f^/ C;ift Certificates w