Loading...
SDR1997-00008 SDR97 -00008 LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION NOTICE OF DECISION , SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR] 91-0008 CITY O I'GARD Community Development LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION Snapug91 Better Commuru:ty SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY 120 DAYS=11/29/97 CASE NO(S).: FILE NAME: LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION Site Development Review (SDR) 97-0008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 17,200 square foot parking lot for employee/customer parking. The lot will be an expansion of a previously approved lot for a total of 96 parking spaces APPLICANT: Jim Corliss, President OWNER: Same Landmark Ford 12000 SW 66th Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment, MUE. ZONING DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment, MUE. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. The site is located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164, Tigard Triangle Design Standards, and the MUE Zoning Standards. SECTION II: DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 1 OF 14 CONDITIONS OF APPROVE._ PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1 . Prior to issuance of the site permit, additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 68th to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. L-1 landscaping will be installed along the northern property line (along SW Dartmouth Street); B. The proposed L-1 landscaping trees are in addition to required street trees; and C. The proposed L-1 landscaping trees will be 31/4 -inch caliper. 3. Provide a letter from a landscape architect that indicates the proposed vegetation meets the 90% opacity design standard and that the proposed ground cover will fully cover the remaining landscape area within two (2) years or revise the plans accordingly. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the street trees are located within the right-of-way, no more than 27 feet apart on SW Dartmouth Street and no more than 22 feet apart on SW 68th Avenue. 5. Submit a letter from a landscape architect that verifies the trees along SW Dartmouth Street are broad spreading and the trees along SW 68th Avenue are columnar. The trees indicated on the plan do not meet the above standards, the plan must be revised to provide for trees that meet the standards. 6. Submit a revised plan that shows the location of one (1) bicycle parking space. This may be located with other bicycle spaces, however, must be in addition to spaces currently required. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED l PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION: 7. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 14 SECTION III: BALi.GROUND INFORMATION Site History: No development approvals were found for this site. The site is, however, being developed as a parking lot for Landmark Ford. Adjacent lots have received development approval for the construction of a parking lot (SDR 95-0012), which this project will be tied into to provide additional parking. Previous approvals related to Landmark Ford construction and expansions include SDR 90-0019 and SDR 96-0013. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue. The site is identified as 6840 SW Dartmouth, WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Property to the north, south and west are zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE) and property to the east is zoned General Commercial (C-G). All surrounding properties (with the exception of property to the north) is, or will be, developed by Landmark Ford. Property to the north is currently developed with a residence. This property is separated from the site by SW Dartmouth Street and undeveloped right-of-way. The site is in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a single-family residence. The proposal is to demolish the existing structure and expand the existing Landmark Ford parking lot by adding 15,372 square feet of impervious surface and 13 net parking spaces. The applicant applied for and received a minor modification to SDR 95-0012 in order to allow the expansion to work with the previously approved lot. The minor modification reduced some parking spaces and slightly changed the on-site traffic circulation, thus the expansion will only net 13 additional spaces. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS OF UNDERLYING ZONE The MUE zone states that dimensional requirements for all commercial use types shall be the same as the C-G district. Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. Developments are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The expansion provides for more than 15% landscaping, thus meeting the underlying landscaping regulations. Please note, however, that additional landscaping standards apply which may increase the amount of landscaping required. The MUE zone states that the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for all commercial and industrial use types shall not exceed 0.40. No structures are proposed for this site, therefore, this criterion does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 14 Setbacks: Section 1 x.d2.050 states that no front, sick, or rear yard setback is required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback is required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet Setbacks are not applicable as the proposal does not involve a structure. Setbacks relating to required landscaping are discussed in further sections of this decision. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone have been met. TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in non single family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Because the proposal does not involve the construction of a building, the following standards do not apply: Site Design Standards including: building placement, building setback, front yard setback design and walkway connection to building entrances; and Building Design Standards including: ground floor windows, building facades, weather protection, building materials, roofs and roof-lines, and roof-mounted equipment. The following design standards are applicable to this development: Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 4 OF 14 Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet. b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile. b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance. c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The site meets the design option for the distance between SW 68th Street and SW 69th Street because there is approximately 209 feet between the two (2) streets. This distance meets both the 660-foot local street spacing requirement and the 330-foot pedestrian/bicycle connection standard. The development meets the performance option for the distance between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Elmhurst Street because there are eight (8) intersections per mile along SW 68th Avenue. Performance option b. and c. are met because the access (local origin) is from SW Elmhurst Street which intersects with SW 68th Avenue, a minor arterial. FINDING: Because the site meets the design option and performance option, the street connectivity standards have been met. Site Design Standards; Parking location and landscape design Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be Ficated to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50 percent of the street frontage, and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The site is an expansion to an approved parking lot. There are no "newly constructed" structures proposed for this lot, therefore, the parking lot location can not be applied. However, the landscape requirements must be met. Both SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue are arterials as identified in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, therefore, a minimum of five (5) feet of L-1 landscaping is required along both frontages. The interior side yard and rear yard landscaping must meet the L-2 standards. The plan indicates that five (5)-foot landscaped setbacks will be provided along SW 68th Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street. Compliance with the L-1 and L-2 landscape standards are discussed in detail in further sections of this decision. FINDING: Because the parking lot location standard can not be applied and because the landscaping requirements will be addressed, and conditioned if necessary further in this decision, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 5 OF 14 Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.114 of the Development Code the following standards shall be met: Zoning district regulations: non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.114.130 D). Sign area limits: The maximum sign area limits found in 18.114.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. Based on the nature of the development, it is unlikely that a sign would be desired. If a sign is requested, however, all signs shall be approved through the sign permit process as administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. Compliance with sign standards will be reviewed at that time. FINDING: Because compliance with sign codes will be required if and when a sign permit is applied for, these standards have been satisfied. Landscaping And Screening: Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are define in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 3 1 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3 foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The landscape plan submitted indicates that the five (5)-foot setback along SW 68th Avenue will be planted with a combination of Forsythia, Candy Tuft, Rhododendron and Lithodora. According to The Western Garden Book, the Rhododendron and Forsythia can grow to meet the 3-foot requirement, however staff can not determine if these can meet the 90% opacity. In order to insure these plants meet the requirement, the applicant must submit a letter from the landscape architect verifying that these plants meet the standard for L-1 landscaping. Candy Tuft and Lithodora are low growing groundcover plants NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 6 OF 14 according to "'The Western Garden Book", however, a landscape architect's verification is required for these plants as well as to insure they can fully cover the remaining landscape area within two (2) years. No landscaping, other than three (3) Incense Cedar trees are planned for the setback along SW Dartmouth Street. A revised landscape plan must be submitted which shows this area will be landscaped to L-1 standards. The existing trees exceed the 31-inch caliper requirement, however, the proposed trees do not. It appears that the trees proposed are intended to meet the street tree requirement and no trees have been planned to meet the L-1 landscaping requirement. The applicant must submit a revised landscape plan that clearly states the trees proposed to meet the L-1 landscape standard. These trees must be on the property and must be at least 31-inch caliper and no more than 28 feet apart. L-2 (General Landscaping) For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 2 '/s inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The L-2 landscaping standards do not apply to this site because the rear and interior sideyard of the development being reviewed are part of, and tied into a previously approved employee/customer parking lot for Landmark Ford. All interior parking lot landscaping must meet Section 18.100 standards and will be discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Because the landscape plan does not meet the L-1 landscaping standards stated above, the Tigard Triangle parking location and landscape design standards have not been met. If the applicant meets the conditions specified below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: 1. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows: a. L-1 landscaping will be installed along the northern property line (along SW Dartmouth Street); b. the proposed trees are in addition to required street trees; and c. the proposed trees will be 31/2-inch caliper. 2. Provide a letter from a landscape architect that indicates the proposed vegetation meets the 90% opacity design standard and proposed ground cover will fully cover the remaining landscape area within two (2) years or revise the plans accordingly. PROVISIONS OF DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTERS Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 7 OF 14 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, ..s.164, MUE Standards and Tigard . ,jangle Design Standards. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), 18.166 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage) or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The site is surrounded by MUE to the north, south and east and C-G to the west. There is an existing residence to the north of the site. This residence is across SW Dartmouth Street and separated by a large undeveloped public right-of-way, therefore, additional screening and landscaping is not required (Please note, additional triangle standards apply as discussed previously in this decision.) Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. While this standard applies, the requirement to screen parking is superseded by the Tigard Triangle Design landscaping standards. The requirement for landscape islands is applicable and has been met. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Tigard Triangle Design Standards (which supersedes all other code provisions) call for columnar street trees 22 feet on center along SW 68th Avenue, and broad spreading street trees 27 feet on center along SW Dartmouth Street. Street trees are required to be a minimum of two (2)-inch caliper. The plan shows proposed street trees on the property line of the SW 68th Avenue frontage and within the property on the Dartmouth frontage. Street trees must be located within the right-of-way (trees required for L-1 landscaping are required within the property). The trees indicated on the plan meet the size requirement, however, the separation does not meet the standards. A revised plan must be submitted which shows the location is in the right-of-way and the trees are no greater than 27 feet apart on SW Dartmouth Street and 22 feet apart on SW 68th Avenue. In addition, a letter from a NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 8 OF 14 landscape architect must ue submitted which verifies that the L.ees chosen for SW 68th Avenue are columnar and for SW Dartmouth Street are broad spreading. FINDING: Because the location of the trees does not meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and applicable code sections and because staff can not confirm that the proposed trees are the type required, the street tree standards have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions specified below, the standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: 1. Submit a revised plan that shows the trees are located within the right- of-way, no more than 27 feet apart on SW Dartmouth Street and no more than 22 feet apart on SW 68th Avenue. 2. Submit a letter from a landscape architect that verifies the trees indicated along SW Dartmouth Street are broad spreading and the trees indicated along SW 68th Avenue are columnar. If the trees indicated do not meet the requirement, the plan must be revised to provide for trees that do. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. There are no vision clearance areas on this site because the property is not adjacent to intersecting (there is a large undeveloped right-of-way at the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street) right-of-way and there is no direct driveway access from this site to the right-of-way. FINDING: Because the property is not adjacent to intersecting right-of-way and there is no direct driveway access from this site to the right-of-way, the vision clearance standard does not apply. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) - Minimum off-street parking: This standard does not apply as the proposal is an expansion to the Landmark Ford parking lot only and no additional structures or sales area will be constructed. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 9 OF 14 Because the site will rebult in a net increase of 13 spaces, we (1) bicycle rack space is required. Because this development is part of an existing business, if there is adequate bicycle parking near the Landmark Ford building, this standard shall be satisfied FINDING: Because one (1) bicycle parking space is required and the plan does not indicate bicycle parking has been provided for, this standard has not been met. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows the proposed bicycle parking or indicates the existing location of a bicycle rack at the Landmark Ford sales office or other accessible site that is adequate to meet the requirement in addition to previous bicycle parking space requirements, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows the location of one (1) bicycle parking space. This may be located with other bicycle spaces, however, must be in addition to spaces currently provided. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. There will be no access directly from the parcel to the right-of-way. The proposal is an expansion of a parking lot which has access to SW Elmhurst Street. The total number of parking spaces after the expansion is 96, therefore, the one (1) existing access is acceptable. FINDING: Because the existing site meets the access requirements, this standard has been met. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. This provision is superseded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards which were discussed previously in this decision. FINDING: Because the Tigard Triangle Design Standards relating to signs take precedence, this standard does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. A tree plan has been provided by a certified arborist. The plan indicates 17 existing trees greater than 12-inch caliper. Four (4) or 23% of these trees must be removed. Removal of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper does not require mitigation of trees NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 10 OF 14 removed. (Please note that seven (7) trees less than 12-inch caliper will be removed as part of this development, however, only trees greater than 12-inch must be mitigated for.) FINDING: Because no more than 25% of the trees over 12-inch caliper will be removed as a result of this proposal, this criterion has been met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue. This application will be subject to the new Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Dartmouth Street SW Dartmouth Street is classified as an arterial street in the Triangle Standards. The right-of-way (ROW) requirement for this roadway is 70 feet. There is adequate ROW adjacent to this site; no further dedications are required. The applicant has obtained an additional Street Opening Permit from the City to add concrete sidewalk along the frontage of Dartmouth Street adjacent to this new site. 68th Parkway This roadway is also classified as an arterial street in the Triangle Standards. There is presently 30 feet of ROW west of centerline adjacent to this site. In order to comply with the new Triangle Design Standards, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 35 feet from centerline. This dedication shall be done prior to issuance of the site permit. Water: The site is presently served from the public water system managed by Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). No further water line work is proposed. Sanitary Sewer: There are no public sanitary sewer improvements needed or proposed for this project. Storm Drainage: The storm water from this site flows to the southwest. The applicant will be modifying a previously approved onsite storm drainage system design in order to accommodate this addition. Staff has already reviewed and approved the modifications to the onsite ponds. The Building Division will need to approve the change in on-site pipe design. The outfall location on SW 69th Avenue was also previously approved and will remain unchanged due to this addition. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. As stated in the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 11 OF 14 previous section, the aI..,,lcant has already submitted revise. calculations for the on-site water quality facilities. Staff has reviewed the design and calculations and has approved them. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. FINDING: Because the existing site has water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage service, and because Engineering Staff has determined that if the applicant dedicates five (5) feet of right-of-way along SW 68th Avenue, the Street and Utility Improvement Standards will be met. The applicant must comply with Condition #1 of this decision in order for the standards to be met. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise); 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.120.180.11(Access and Circulation); 18.120.180.13(Parking); 18.120.180.14(Landscaping); 18.120.180.15(Drainage); and 18.120.180.17(Signs). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are no buildings proposed, however, the paving and landscaping has been arranged in an effort to retain as many trees on the site as possible. The tree plan indicates 17 of the 28 existing trees over six (6)--inch caliper will be retained. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 12 OF 14 FINDING: Because tht site has been planned with consl,_,ation of the natural and physical environment, staff finds this criterion has been met. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The parking lot is for employee/customer parking only. The site will be completely surrounded by six (6)-foot chain link fencing. A lighting plan was submitted which indicates six (6), 400 watt arm-mounted lighting fixtures will be installed on this lot. FINDING: Because lighting is being provided and the entire lot will be fenced, this standard has been satisfied. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 4 disabled parking space if 76 to 100 parking spaces are provided. This proposal is an expansion to an existing approved parking lot for a total of 96 parking spaces. There are seven (7) handicap parking spaces provided on the original lot, therefore, no additional spaces are required by this expansion. FINDING: Because the required number of disabled parking spaces will be provided, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into this decision. Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 13 OF 14 SECTION VI: PR ,EDURE AND APPEAL INFORII. f1ON Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 24, 1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 24, 1997. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . i ,i 444 e September 11 , 1997 PR 'DARED B Julia Powell Hajdbic ' 7 DATE Associate Planner U September 11 , 1997 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i s\c u rp l n y u l i a's d r97-08 NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 14 OF 14 , 7it / , 1 �t pay � I 944 I - 1 \ .. . .r ..... \,,..„ ..\\ . \ -,, ,.., : ,„\, , 1 . . 1..... 7.,•., ,.• . . mi ) 1 ._ 14 E. ...,._ ,.... .k : iv PROPOSED ' '•' 1.. PARKING LOT Z I s \ • ADD 0 : ! ■ + � � , TION 1 • I I �; - . l .1 Z � t rQ.1 2 1 1 Z 1a a, ; ,- ;. T° , -, i 4 . ..."' ‘111. I re if Q i 1 ; . _ .rI f- : T i ! _ • ! , 1� N 0 7 I- " .1: . _ N-...*:-, il 1 3 ,,.,,,,a.,--.1 4 0 i i — -SW.' EL- HURST ST- • ! SITE PLAN ; CASE NCO. SDR 97-0008 EXHIBIT MAP Landmark Ford Pkng.lot Expansion Q 1 U 1 ZiV CLINTON i I all . a CC 0 DARTMOUTH ST SUBJECT iII, 0) I 1-7 ' i ST CO o Mil 0 FRANKLIN ST Iii1 i ._____________________ Vicinity Map A ' SDR 91-0008 A Landmark Ford Pkng.lot Expansion REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: September 10, 1997 TO: Julia Hajduk, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer F3g---- RE: SDR 97-0008, Landmark Ford Parking Lot Expansion Description: This approval will allow the applicant to add another 0.40 acre parking area to a previously approved parking lot expansion adjacent to this site. The previously approved lot has been under construction. Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue. This application will be subject to the new Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Dartmouth Street SW Dartmouth Street is classified as an arterial street in the Triangle Standards. The right-of-way (ROW) requirement for this roadway is 70 feet. There is adequate ROW adjacent to this site; no further dedications are required. The applicant has obtained an additional Street Opening Permit from the City to add concrete sidewalk along the frontage of Dartmouth Street adjacent to this new site. 68th Parkway This roadway is also classified as an arterial street in the Triangle Standards. There is presently 30 feet of ROW west of centerline adjacent to this site. In order to comply with the new Triangle standards, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 35 feet from centerline. This dedication shall be done prior to issuance of the site permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0008 Landmark Ford Parking Lot PAGE 1 2. Water: The site is presently served from the public water system managed by Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). No further water line work is proposed. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There are no public sanitary sewer improvements needed or proposed for this project. 4. Storm Drainage: The storm water from this site flows to the southwest. The applicant will be modifying a previously approved onsite storm drainage system design in order to accommodate this addition. Staff has already reviewed and approved the modifications to the onsite ponds. The Building Division will need to approve the change in on-site pipe design. The outfall location on SW 69th Avenue was also previously approved and will remain unchanged due to this addition. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. As stated in the previous section, the applicant has already submitted revised calculations for the on-site water quality facilities. Staff has reviewed the design and calculations and has approved them. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91- 47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0008 Landmark Ford Parking Lot PAGE 2 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of the site permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of to increase the right-of-way to feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. is\eng\brianr\comments\sdr97-08.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0008 Landmark Ford Parking Lot PAGE 3 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIC;ARD Community Deve(opment DATE: August 13,1991 RECEIVED PLANNING Shaping Better Community TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program AUG 2 5 1997 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CfPl()� CONTACT: Julia Hajduk[x4011 Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]91-0008 LANDMARK FORD EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT EXPANSION < The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to develop a lot for employee/customer parking. This parking lot will connect to the existing lot which received approval under SDR 95-0012. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards; and the MUE Zoning Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday-August 25,1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Xs Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: AUG 1 5 1997 Please provide the folTowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(sl: 13- q; — z) 4— I SDR 97-0008 LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: August 22, 1997 TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard Planning Department FROM: Julia Huffman, USA V SUBJECT: Landmark Ford Employee Parking Lot Expansion, SDR 97-0008 STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties,or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. 155 North First Avenue,Suite 270, MS 10 Phone:503/648-8621 Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 FAX:503/640-3525 08. 25/97 MON 08:39 FAX 503 591 0986 TVWD ENGINEERING 1 001 rr° REQUEST O!DI9I IEH cny•L,lOF TIGARD Community cDeveCapment Shaping't Better Community DATE: August 13,1997 AUG 2 5 1997 .1fr Tualatin Valley Water District MC6 T� 8 1097 1 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia alduk(x4071 Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031684-1291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SD11191-0008 LANDMARK FORD EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT EXPANSION The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to develop a lot for employee/customer parking. This parking lot will connect to the existing lot which received approval under SDR 95-0012. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards: and the MUE Zoning Standards. Attached are the Site Plan.Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other informat •• _ - - to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on t - • :•'sal in the near • e. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: II nda -Au I ust 251991. Y. ay use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you ; • I . I I •spond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. P CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: I l(Prease provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 7-',),t j '„u� [Phone Number(s): — .jv Z SDR 97-0008 LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION P OPflc I/AFC I IFCT Flip rnA IMFMTQ • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF IIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: August 13,1991 AUG 2 0 1997 TO: John Roy,Property Manager CM OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Divis" n STAFF CONTACT: Julia Hajduk MOB Phone:[503)639-4171 Fax:[5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]91-0008 LANDMARK FORD EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT EXPANSION The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to develop a lot for employee/customer parking. This parking lot will connect to the existing lot which received approval under SDR 95-0012. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards; and the MUE Zoning Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday-August 25,1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V ►► ((lease provide the foil-owing information)Name of Person's]Commenting: Phone Numberfsl: SDR 97-0008 LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIGARD Community(Development RECEIVED PLANNING Shaping Better Community DATE: August 13,1991 AUG 1 5 1997 TO: David Scott,Building Official CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Hajduk(x4OT] Phone:(5031 639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR]97-0008 F. LANDMARK FORD EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT EXPANSION <4 The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to develop a lot for employee/customer parking. This parking lot will connect to the existing lot which received approval under SDR 95-0012. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards; and the MUE Zoning Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday-August25,1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V ►► (Please procnfe the foclouinj ir:fomation)Name of Person's]Commenting: , v Phone Number(s): y � SDR 97-0008 LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IIGARD Community(Development Shaping etter Community DATE: August 13,1997 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Hajduk(x4071 Phone:150316394171 Fax:150316847297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR]97-0008 LANDMARK FORD EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT EXPANSION The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to develop a lot for employee/customer parking. This parking lot will connect to the existing lot which received approval under SDR 95-0012. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards; and the MUE Zoning Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday-August 25,1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: I Phone Number(sl: I SDR 97-0008 LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION UST HI UMO ISE A OEYELIPMENTAPPUCATIINS err Ant (CI II] (SI MI CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS Q Placa tor milieu a Wart UTButts) I FILE NOM.: Ali) 677-0°°Y FILE MAMEIS]: ! (\ oill ,rJ kr9, 10Y- CITY OFRCES __ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,•......y.ro.... COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJo....s..r.y..... POLICE DEPT./c,...........0... BUILDING DIVJDavid Scott.a•+••wowe. J GINEERING DEPT.,Bnan Rager.a....4.�...E..�...= WATER DEPTJMichael Miller.o.........,,. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,ce....... cPERATIONS DEPTJJohn Roy........•.... _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia HuffmaNSWM Program Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AHD STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON _CITY OF TUALATIN _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS PO Box 4755 Planning Director 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street.NE Beaverton,OR 97076 PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem.OR 97310-1337 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 _ Larry Conrad.$..ar.w.« _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _Mike Matteucci,...ow..Q.,o.a METRO _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street.NE 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 CITY OF DURHAM Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 City Manager US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. .. PO Box 23483 _Paulette Allen,o.o.aI..a.y..n...C„ ,. a ,, OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Durham.OR 97281-3483 _Mel Huie,Greenso.a.Cao.a..wartCPaa20Aq 1175 Court Street.NE PO Box 294.6 Salem.OR 97310-0590 Portland,CR 97208-2946 _CITY OF KING CITY METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION City Manager 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(0007) WASHINGTON COUNTY 15300 SW 116th Avenue Building*16.Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. King City,OR 97224 Portland.OR 97232-2109 Attn: Tom Highland,ft...4 155 N.First Avenue 3040 25th Street.SE Suite 350.MS 13 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,CR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 Planning Director Bonneville Power Administration PO Box 369 PO Box 3621 _ODOT,REGION 1 Brent Curtis 0n.si Lake Oswego.CR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Sonya Kazen.awry.n...c.... _Scott King(cram Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Mike Borreson,E,.q...., _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland.OR 97209.4037 _Jim Tice pc.. David Knowles.P.,.ry a....o.. _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Tom Harry fa....Pi..act.i Portland Budding 106. Rm. 1002 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A _Phil Heaty cc..,...ix Aco&I 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes.Piny.,Somalia Portland.CR 97204 PO°ox 25412 Portland.CR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES BURLINGTON NORTHERN RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.(RIR) _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Administrative Office Jason Hewitt C:ifford C.Cabe.Construction Engineer Michael Kiser.Project Planner 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 5424 SE McLaughlin Boulevard 710 NE Holladay Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place.S-6020 Portland.CR 97232 Portland.CR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Craig Eyestone _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Linda Peterson Pete Nelson 14200 SW Bngadoon Court Scott Palmer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street Beaverton,CR 97005 220 SW Second Avenue Portland.CR 97201 Portland.CR 97204 Portland.CR 97209-3991 _GENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Koft. Engineenng _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MC: OR030546 Bnan Moore Tigard,OR 97281-3416 14655 SW Old Scriolis Ferry Road Beaverton.OR 97007 nVa.ayvnaxersvrenaca mx 2-May-37 A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ` CITY OF TIOARD • Communtty■Development Shaping A,Better Community • STATE OT OtlaGON County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard I, Patricia L Lansford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED G) PUBLIC HEARING FOB: (errw+warw�rrl Mar Ma PrfaI Now (Oak i 1tt1I}rw lin IOW) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission C Tigard City Council That I served NO110E OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR Mint�sesKr rsarr, {amt mersortw w ban.} City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council O That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOB A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF MNAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A",x2as mailed to eac. n-med •ers•n(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Miff on the 7=1 da _ of _if/ i,G•• • / 1991 and deposited in the United States Mail on the ' day of ,4 .i. _ � 1997, postage prepaid. 01.-iffamw [Person that Prepared N :cal Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 day of n01) • , 1917 OFFICIAL SEAL ! S !!� .n MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07 1999 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGO My Commission Expires: = ,5 Lod g-xp2riva) A NOTICE OF DECISION 44" SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR] 91-0008 CITY IIGARD Community Development LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION Shaping A.Better Community SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY 120 DAYS=11/29/97 CASE NO(S).: FILE NAME: LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION Site Development Review (SDR) 97-0008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 17,200 square foot parking lot for employee/customer parking. The lot will be an expansion of a previously approved lot for a total of 96 parking spaces APPLICANT: Jim Corliss, President OWNER: Same Landmark Ford 12000 SW 66th Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment, MUE. ZONING DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment, MUE. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. The site is located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164, Tigard Triangle Design Standards, and the MUE Zoning Standards. SECTION II: DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 1 OF 14 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of the site permit, additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 68th to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. L-1 landscaping will be installed along the northern property line (along SW Dartmouth Street); B. The proposed L-1 landscaping trees are in addition to required street trees; and C. The proposed L-1 landscaping trees will be 31/2 -inch caliper. 3. Provide a letter from a landscape architect that indicates the proposed vegetation meets the 90% opacity design standard and that the proposed ground cover will fully cover the remaining landscape area within two (2) years or revise the plans accordingly. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the street trees are located within the right-of-way, no more than 27 feet apart on SW Dartmouth Street and no more than 22 feet apart on SW 68th Avenue. 5. Submit a letter from a landscape architect that verifies the trees along SW Dartmouth Street are broad spreading and the trees along SW 68th Avenue are columnar. The trees indicated on the plan do not meet the above standards, the plan must be revised to provide for trees that meet the standards. 6. Submit a revised plan that shows the location of one (1) bicycle parking space. This may be located with other bicycle spaces, however, must be in addition to spaces currently required. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION: 7. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 14 SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION • Site History: No development approvals were found for this site. The site is, however, being developed as a parking lot for Landmark Ford. Adjacent lots have received development approval for the construction of a parking lot (SDR 95-0012), which this project will be tied into to provide additional parking. Previous approvals related to Landmark Ford construction and expansions include SDR 90-0019 and SDR 96-0013. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue. The site is identified as 6840 SW Dartmouth, WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Property to the north, south and west are zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE) and property to the east is zoned General Commercial (C-G). All surrounding properties (with the exception of property to the north) is, or will be, developed by Landmark Ford. Property to the north is currently developed with a residence. This property is separated from the site by SW Dartmouth Street and undeveloped right-of-way. The site is in the Tigard Triangle, therefore, Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a single-family residence. The proposal is to demolish the existing structure and expand the existing Landmark Ford parking lot by adding 15,372 square feet of impervious surface and 13 net parking spaces. The applicant applied for and received a minor modification to SDR 95-0012 in order to allow the expansion to work with the previously approved lot. The minor modification reduced some parking spaces and slightly changed the on-site traffic circulation, thus the expansion will only net 13 additional spaces. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS OF UNDERLYING ZONE The MUE zone states that dimensional requirements for all commercial use types shall be the same as the C-G district. Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. Developments are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The expansion provides for more than 15% landscaping, thus meeting the underlying landscaping regulations. Please note, however, that additional landscaping standards apply which may increase the amount of landscaping required. The MUE zone states that the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for all commercial and industrial use types shall not exceed 0.40. No structures are proposed for this site, therefore, this criterion does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 14 Setbacks: Section 1 8.162.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback is required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet Setbacks are not applicable as the proposal does not involve a structure. Setbacks relating to required landscaping are discussed in further sections of this decision. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone have been met. TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in non single family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Because the proposal does not involve the construction of a building, the following standards do not apply: Site Design Standards including: building placement, building setback, front yard setback design and walkway connection to building entrances; and Building Design Standards including: ground floor windows, building facades, weather protection, building materials, roofs and roof-lines, and roof-mounted equipment. The following design standards are applicable to this development: Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 4 OF 14 Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet. b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile. b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance. c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The site meets the design option for the distance between SW 68th Street and SW 69th Street because there is approximately 209 feet between the two (2) streets. This distance meets both the 660-foot local street spacing requirement and the 330-foot pedestrian/bicycle connection standard. The development meets the performance option for the distance between SW Dartmouth Street and SW Elmhurst Street because there are eight (8) intersections per mile along SW 68th Avenue. Performance option b. and c. are met because the access (local origin) is from SW Elmhurst Street which intersects with SW 68th Avenue, a minor arterial. FINDING: Because the site meets the design option and performance option, the street connectivity standards have been met. Site Design Standards; Parking location and landscape design Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50 percent of the street frontage, and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The site is an expansion to an approved parking lot. There are no "newly constructed" structures proposed for this lot, therefore, the parking lot location can not be applied. However, the landscape requirements must be met. Both SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue are arterials as identified in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, therefore, a minimum of five (5) feet of L-1 landscaping is required along both frontages. The interior side yard and rear yard landscaping must meet the L-2 standards. The plan indicates that five (5)-foot landscaped setbacks will be provided along SW 68th Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street. Compliance with the L-1 and L-2 landscape standards are discussed in detail in further sections of this decision. FINDING: Because the parking lot location standard can not be applied and because the landscaping requirements will be addressed, and conditioned if necessary further in this decision, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 5 OF 14 Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.114 of the Development Code the following standards shall be met: Zoning district regulations: non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.114.130 D). Sign area limits: The maximum sign area limits found in 18.114.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. Based on the nature of the development, it is unlikely that a sign would be desired. If a sign is requested, however, all signs shall be approved through the sign permit process as administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. Compliance with sign standards will be reviewed at that time. FINDING: Because compliance with sign codes will be required if and when a sign permit is applied for, these standards have been satisfied. Landscaping And Screening: Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are define in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 3 1 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3 foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The landscape plan submitted indicates that the five (5)-foot setback along SW 68th Avenue will be planted with a combination of Forsythia, Candy Tuft, Rhododendron and Lithodora. According to The Western Garden Book, the Rhododendron and Forsythia can grow to meet the 3-foot requirement, however staff can not determine if these can meet the 90% opacity. In order to insure these plants meet the requirement, the applicant must submit a letter from the landscape architect verifying that these plants meet the standard for L-1 landscaping. Candy Tuft and Lithodora are low growing groundcover plants NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 6 OF 14 according to "(Tie Western Garden Book", however, a landscape architect's verification is required for these plants as well as to insure they can fully cover the remaining landscape area within two (2) years. No landscaping, other than three (3) Incense Cedar trees are planned for the setback along SW Dartmouth Street. A revised landscape plan must be submitted which shows this area will be landscaped to L-1 standards. The existing trees exceed the 31/2-inch caliper requirement, however, the proposed trees do not. It appears that the trees proposed are intended to meet the street tree requirement and no trees have been planned to meet the L-1 landscaping requirement. The applicant must submit a revised landscape plan that clearly states the trees proposed to meet the L-1 landscape standard. These trees must be on the property and must be at least 31/2-inch caliper and no more than 28 feet apart. L-2 (General Landscaping) For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 2 '/z inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The L-2 landscaping standards do not apply to this site because the rear and interior sideyard of the development being reviewed are part of, and tied into a previously approved employee/customer parking lot for Landmark Ford. All interior parking lot landscaping must meet Section 18.100 standards and will be discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Because the landscape plan does not meet the L-1 landscaping standards stated above, the Tigard Triangle parking location and landscape design standards have not been met. If the applicant meets the conditions specified below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: 1 . Submit a revised landscape plan that shows: a. L-1 landscaping will be installed along the northern property line (along SW Dartmouth Street); b. the proposed trees are in addition to required street trees; and c. the proposed trees will be 31/2-inch caliper. 2. Provide a letter from a landscape architect that indicates the proposed vegetation meets the 90% opacity design standard and proposed ground cover will fully cover the remaining landscape area within two (2) years or revise the plans accordingly. PROVISIONS OF DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTERS Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 7 OF 14 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, ics.164, MUE Standards and Tigard iriangle Design Standards. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), 18.166 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage) or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The site is surrounded by MUE to the north, south and east and C-G to the west. There is an existing residence to the north of the site. This residence is across SW Dartmouth Street and separated by a large undeveloped public right-of-way, therefore, additional screening and landscaping is not required (Please note, additional triangle standards apply as discussed previously in this decision.) Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. While this standard applies, the requirement to screen parking is superseded by the Tigard Triangle Design landscaping standards. The requirement for landscape islands is applicable and has been met. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Tigard Triangle Design Standards (which supersedes all other code provisions) call for columnar street trees 22 feet on center along SW 68th Avenue, and broad spreading street trees 27 feet on center along SW Dartmouth Street. Street trees are required to be a minimum of two (2)-inch caliper. The plan shows proposed street trees on the property line of the SW 68th Avenue frontage and within the property on the Dartmouth frontage. Street trees must be located within the right-of-way (trees required for L-1 landscaping are required within the property). The trees indicated on the plan meet the size requirement, however, the separation does not meet the standards. A revised plan must be submitted which shows the location is in the right-of-way and the trees are no greater than 27 feet apart on SW Dartmouth Street and 22 feet apart on SW 68th Avenue. In addition, a letter from a NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 8 OF 14 landscape architect must De submitted which verifies that the trees chosen for SW 68th Avenue are columnar and for SW Dartmouth Street are broad spreading. • FINDING: Because the location of the trees does not meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and applicable code sections and because staff can not confirm that the proposed trees are the type required, the street tree standards have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions specified below, the standards will be satisfied. CONDITION: 1 . Submit a revised plan that shows the trees are located within the right- of-way, no more than 27 feet apart on SW Dartmouth Street and no more than 22 feet apart on SW 68th Avenue. 2. Submit a letter from a landscape architect that verifies the trees indicated along SW Dartmouth Street are broad spreading and the trees indicated along SW 68th Avenue are columnar. If the trees indicated do not meet the requirement, the plan must be revised to provide for trees that do. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. There are no vision clearance areas on this site because the property is not adjacent to intersecting (there is a large undeveloped right-of-way at the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street) right-of-way and there is no direct driveway access from this site to the right-of-way. FINDING: Because the property is not adjacent to intersecting right-of-way and there is no direct driveway access from this site to the right-of-way, the vision clearance standard does not apply. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) - Minimum off-street parking: This standard does not apply as the proposal is an expansion to the Landmark Ford parking lot only and no additional structures or sales area will be constructed. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 9 OF 14 Because the site will result in a net increase of 13 spaces, one (1) bicycle rack space is required. Because this development is part of an existing business, if there is adequate bicycle parking near the Landmark Ford building, this standard shall be satisfied FINDING: Because one (1) bicycle parking space is required and the plan does not indicate bicycle parking has been provided for, this standard has not been met. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows the proposed bicycle parking or indicates the existing location of a bicycle rack at the Landmark Ford sales office or other accessible site that is adequate to meet the requirement in addition to previous bicycle parking space requirements, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows the location of one (1) bicycle parking space. This may be located with other bicycle spaces, however, must be in addition to spaces currently provided. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. There will be no access directly from the parcel to the right-of-way. The proposal is an expansion of a parking lot which has access to SW Elmhurst Street. The total number of parking spaces after the expansion is 96, therefore, the one (1) existing access is acceptable. FINDING: Because the existing site meets the access requirements, this standard has been met. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. This provision is superseded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards which were discussed previously in this decision. FINDING: Because the Tigard Triangle Design Standards relating to signs take precedence, this standard does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. A tree plan has been provided by a certified arborist. The plan indicates 17 existing trees greater than 12-inch caliper. Four (4) or 23% of these trees must be removed. Removal of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper does not require mitigation of trees NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 10 OF 14 removed. (Please note that seven (7) trees less than 12-inch caliper will be removed as part of this development, however, only trees greater than 12-inch must be mitigated for.) FINDING: Because no more than 25% of the trees over 12-inch caliper will be removed as a result of this proposal, this criterion has been met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue. This application will be subject to the new Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Dartmouth Street SW Dartmouth Street is classified as an arterial street in the Triangle Standards. The right-of-way (ROW) requirement for this roadway is 70 feet. There is adequate ROW adjacent to this site; no further dedications are required. The applicant has obtained an additional Street Opening Permit from the City to add concrete sidewalk along the frontage of Dartmouth Street adjacent to this new site. 68th Parkway This roadway is also classified as an arterial street in the Triangle Standards. There is presently 30 feet of ROW west of centerline adjacent to this site. In order to comply with the new Triangle Design Standards, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 35 feet from centerline. This dedication shall be done prior to issuance of the site permit. Water: The site is presently served from the public water system managed by Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). No further water line work is proposed. Sanitary Sewer: There are no public sanitary sewer improvements needed or proposed for this project. Storm Drainage: The storm water from this site flows to the southwest. The applicant will be modifying a previously approved onsite storm drainage system design in order to accommodate this addition. Staff has already reviewed and approved the modifications to the onsite ponds. The Building Division will need to approve the change in on-site pipe design. The outfall location on SW 69th Avenue was also previously approved and will remain unchanged due to this addition. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. As stated in the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 11 OF 14 previous section, the applicant has already submitted revised calculations for the on-site water quality facilities. Staff has reviewed the design and calculations and has approved them. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. FINDING: Because the existing site has water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage service, and because Engineering Staff has determined that if the applicant dedicates five (5) feet of right-of-way along SW 68th Avenue, the Street and Utility Improvement Standards will be met. The applicant must comply with Condition #1 of this decision in order for the standards to be met. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise); 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.120.180.11(Access and Circulation); 18.120.180.13(Parking); 18.120.180.14(Landscaping); 18.120.180.15(Drainage); and 18.120.180.17(Signs). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are no buildings proposed, however, the paving and landscaping has been arranged in an effort to retain as many trees on the site as possible. The tree plan indicates 17 of the 28 existing trees over six (6)--inch caliper will be retained. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 12 OF 14 FINDING: Because the site has been planned with consi aeration of the natural and physical environment, staff finds this criterion has been met. Crime Prevention and Safety.' Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The parking lot is for employee/customer parking only. The site will be completely surrounded by six (6)-foot chain link fencing. A lighting plan was submitted which indicates six (6), 400 watt arm-mounted lighting fixtures will be installed on this lot. FINDING: Because lighting is being provided and the entire lot will be fenced, this standard has been satisfied. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 4 disabled parking space if 76 to 100 parking spaces are provided. This proposal is an expansion to an existing approved parking lot for a total of 96 parking spaces. There are seven (7) handicap parking spaces provided on the original lot, therefore, no additional spaces are required by this expansion. FINDING: Because the required number of disabled parking spaces will be provided, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated into this decision. Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 13 OF 14 SECTION VI: PRui;EDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: DECISION MALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 24, 1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. LINE;F R NG OF AN APPEAL IS-3:30 P.M.ON SEPTEMBER 4 1997. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . September 11 , 1997 PR 'ARED Julia Powell HajddU hti `�J DATE Associate Planner September 11 , 1997 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager \curpin\julia\sdr97-08 NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0008-LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PAGE 14 OF 14 7-- \,:: • , - • t , \ vs DP' 71 ', 1 • 4111111.11imiall ) 1 \' . . F .1. •, _7 ! : k i. . . N I .• s d ; ) PROPOSED , 1 \ 11. • 1 , I Z , PARKING LOT . \ \\ :. i . ■ , 11, ADD TION 0 ' 1 ' * c ,,,-- ). .r. I r---- .'i• • ' .• , i 1 I ca - i .. . 1 I ! • 0 / ,. . ,., ,% ■11 _, k II Z , . -71P0?•, i' ,.,;-.0111Preer: ui ! ...„...„...! 1 , Z • ■ , -......„ 1. . i 1 > 1 i ' • Z L it i li --..,.....„ I t. . \ .. \ < i • < ... _i f ----,: tt" ii -- ; = t 1,.... 7,:i. .ILL.....7:_, ; - ..... _____,..........,.. .' i. 4 0): . ) i r_____ -• i ;1 f i . i CC : • " I ' \ : I I t 1 . : co 1 0 ;co : li - 's--.______ i • i ......--t \ i ' . LL : . t 4 i ■ on II \ 0 . I : 7' I• 7 > I I ! - ,. EBE i I i 0 , , ....;:'Z', • I . • 1.■ ..',...... + 4 7.- 1 . ..._.. ... [ -- 4 - k * 1 '. ---- - --S-W " ELMHURST ST • I ! CASE NCO. SITE PLAN SOR 97-0008 EXHIBIT MAP Landmark Ford Pkng.Lot Expansion . , M M I C CLINTON ,. ST - I ' MI til ■ CD- (1) 0 DARTMOUTH ST SUBJECT 0) c i AR ILLI --»* , ...... 1 _______\\ ,,,,,,, as a, Cl... , 0 co 1-I U 'T _ i ST 0) P y— I 0 0 a , ill ------ U FRANKLIN ST II II 1 1 I i Vicinity Map N SOB 97-0008 „ A Landmark Ford Pkng.Lot Expansion Q --©Oo S' L-a ramark Feral Pl g. L-o 4-,t -X 11.3;40!) (/'y , 10,('/) M EXHIBIT B .1S136DD-07600 2S101AA-01400 CARPENTER.RICHARD L& CORLISS.JAME ORA K POLLOCK,DONALD E/JULIA GAIL PO BO 0 1834 SW 58TH#202 D,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97221 1S136DD-05800 1S136DD-05700 CORLISS,JAMES L&CORA K CORLISS,JAMES L&C PO BOX 23970 PO BOX 239 TIGARD,OR 97281 TIG ,OR 97281 2S101AA-01700 2S101AA-01200 CORLISS.JAMES ORA K CORLISS,JAMES L&C PO BOX PO BOX 23 D,OR 97281 TI OR 97281 2S101AA-01301 2S101AA-00400 CORLISS.JAMES L A K CORLISS,JAMES L AND CORA K PO BOX 9750 SW INEZ ST RD.OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S136DD-06500 1S136DD-06300 JOHNSON,GERALDINE L TR JOHNSON,GERALDIN 10300 SE WAVERLY CT#408 10300 SE Y CT#408 MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 UKIE,OR 97222 1S136DD-06600 2S101AA-02300 JOHNSON,GERALDINE L TR JONES,CECIL E DONNA RAE 10300 SE WAVERLY CT#408 12190 SW 69TH AVE MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-02600 2S101AA-02700 LANDMARK FORD INC LANDMARK FORD INC ATTN:JIM CORLISS PO BOX 23970 PO BOX 23970 TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S101AA-02400 LANDMARK FO C JIM CORLISS, PRESIDENT PO B 70 LANDMARK FORD ARDOR 97281 12000 SW 66TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 2S101AA-01800 2S101AA-02800 LANDON,MARLENE A MONTGOMERY,KENNETH M 6210 SW RIVER RD PO BOX 991 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S101AA-02900 2S101AA-02301 POLLOCK,DONALD E/JULIA GAIL SNYDER,ELLA OPDAL AND 1834 SW 58TH#202 JOHN MILTON PORTLAND,OR 97221 12170 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8929 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ' S EP 16 1997 • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit CITY OF TIGARD • Accounts Payble • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR)97-0008 >LANDMARK FORD EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT EXPANSION< The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Development Review approval to develop a lot for employee/customer parking.This parking lot will connect to the existing lot which received STATE OF OREGON, ) approval under SDR 95-0012.LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' CM 2S101AA,Tax Lot 01800. Located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; I. Kathy Snyder MUE.The MUE Zone allows Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Director,or, duly sworn, rinci depose and say that I am the Advertising Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, ln- Director, or his principal clerk, of th igard d in 1 aSt i 3 n T..mE In- surance and Real Estate Services,Food and Beverage Retail Sales,Par- a newspaper u general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 ticipant Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, and 193.020; published at Tigard in the General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, Manufacturing of Finished aforesaid county and state; that the Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Site Develop. 97-0008 �' Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the 18.120, 18.150, 18.164;Tigard Triangle Design Standards; and the MUE entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and Zoning Standards. consecutive in the following issues: September 11 , 1997 111111111 k_ = EE I- Koi4 oARTMCUTH ST SUBJECT Illilli Subscribed and sworn a re me�this 64/4 11th day of Septeml p }ril » \ 111111_ :: (mot . - �i+�— Not Public for Oregon ( 0 mi. I My Commission Expires: ■ AFFIDAVIT III411•01 a� s 1.-.0 4.. 9 II I IIIII FF2MW JN ST The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall l this final on Sea�cor- ber 24. 1997.Any party to the decision may app accor- dance Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Com- munity Development Code,which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,Septemb _ er 24, 1997. TT8929—Publish September 11, 1997. all 1110 F ti ":\>-) -------J 11:11 = TON �fN T 41 all +la I Pi III • 11111.--- ? ■ iv ■ 1S1c6DDoc.SI Ti 1S 36Dic:scc 00 36DD0 .00 1S1 M.500 1S 36DD0581 18 TMOUTH ST RA D 1S1 :.DD0.700 2S1 iI1AA0'800 2S101AA01700 •C 2S MAO 00 I lip 2S 01AA01:00 • ' *Mil 2S 01 AA01.00 'S101AA02900 2S 01AA0 %II 2S 01AA04601 2S 01AA01c01 2S101AA00400 CO ia, j" 2S 01AAO2S•c00 01AA02•00 , a 1 in mi ST •0) 2S 01AA01�00 I O Min '410 Q I Vicinity Map SDR 97-0008 Notification Area Map We KM5 is rtilmenie N 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW „Tx APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: 4/01T— Property Address/Location(s): 6)Fte 0 J C(AJ 1 l (u FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): I C SI 0/ e� % T Case No.(s): � I� 17-000i Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.:97- 297433 Site Size: .4 d •'9^ !�,Q,e-C l-I SS Application Accepted By: F. a Property Owner/Deed Holders)*: ,, 1M (.01 661 4 _ Date: 7 Z Address: 4'7 S1 SuJ— /3 Phone: G 3y 149 City:�1 I___ i TT / Zip: 7� / Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant': i-i4" n4tM k F c( Jl i J. 1t i4 S-S "Or Address: � 7 &- & 5.1.4) G G71'► Phone: G311131 Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: ' . 9i Zip: 9 7 0_3 A CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Rev.4/21/97 i:lcurpin1masters1sdra.doc authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: -Q Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): caner s Signature/Written Authorization !� ,Title Transfer Instrument or Deed tie/ p,€ i A;� l7 � -F..r.�' � lie U Jay/ t , ISIte/Plot Plan l `D t `- v i 6uAl D '1 fo (#of copies based on pre-app check list) )aee4*invy J�Mzkol l At-thy/At Mi•u t, Ac4h, l�3U 54 J2 Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2-x 111 flAt l'' - 1.,a 144,1211 Jl,hm sit 7 !salr k) R7�`kat_ ,J Applicant's Statement a� ��1�.,,ppww � ��, �� (#of copies based on pre-app check list) /�' y `wy v.ka"' ¶ lata SI1MI 't Z Construction Cost Estimate IV.L 4 • ,4 .. _'' /dh /ol�_l I ,. . p USA Sewer Use Information Card '442. J LICA n41/ (Distributed/completed at application submittal) VII. Q Filing Fee (Under 5100 000) S 800.00 .I. A 4f177 i�._ ) Li4 ad • 7 (5100.000-5999.999) S1,600.00 6f 7:14 4141 -ift- /194 ®d D . (S1 Million&Over) 51,780.00 S5 i$10.000) List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: ' 1•-1 C APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application In the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPUCANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • $I • . •a• . •.•• :_• • •.a. 1 • • • - t • =a• a=r IS • 1 I - II • ••, • 1,. I :a• • • 11 •• -t• ••1 1 . • - propeLW., • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; A and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based cn this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of gar,A owner of the subject property. DATED this / day of JL , 19 diaftibil • ;"signature Owner's Signature /L / q � -. Owner's Signature ' x///99,?...Own er's Signature 2 414- AP CITY OF TIGARD community Development Shaping Better Community FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 91-0008 FILE TITLE: LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION APPLICANT: Jim Corliss, President OWNER: Same Landmark Ford 12000 SW 66th Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-1131 REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to develop a lot for employee/customer parking. This parking lot will connect to the existing lot which received approval under SDR 95-0012. LOCATION: 6840 SW Dartmouth Street; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 01800. Located at the northeast corner of SW 68th Ave. and SW Elmhurst Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards; and the MUE Zoning Standards. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY DATE COMMENTS DUE: Monday - August 25,1997 X STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: Thursday -September 11,1991 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Julia Hajduk. Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 x407 SDR 97-0008 LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY STATE OF 01 N i SS V FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF OREGON County of Washington } I,Jerry R.Hanson, Director of Assess- GRANTOR'S NAME ment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Marlene A. Landon Clerk for said county,do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records of said GRANTEE'S NAME county:" * .vc. James L. Corliss iC!�° ,r. / . L.SEND TAX STATEMENTS To: I Mr. James L Corliss Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Q) Assessment and Taxation,Ex- }J, P.O. Box 23970 Officio County Clerk Tigard, OR 97281 Doc 97050083 Rect: 187345 168. 00 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: 05/30/1997 04: 47. 18pm Mr. James L•Corliss P.O. Box 23970 Tigard, OR 97281 • :•1 • 1 •- - •-t - 1 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED \` Marlene A. Landon, Grantor, conveys and warrants to ri) James L. Corliss and Cora K. Corliss, as tenants in common, Grantee, the following described real property, free and Q clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, OLots 5, 6, 7, 8, 34, 35 and 36, Block 19, West Portland Heights, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, Excepting therefrom that portion of Lots 8, 36, 35 and 34 taken for the widening of S.W. 68th Avenue, described in 1 deed recorded April 1, 1980, as fee no. 8001 1312. Subject to and excepting: The herein described property is within and subject to the statutory power of assessment of the UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY. Limited access as set forth in deed recorded April 1, 1980, Fee# 80011312. Easement granted to State of Oregon recorded April 1, 1980, Fee No. 80011312. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS $135,000.00 (See ORS 93.030) WHICH IS PAID TO AN ACCOMMADATOR AS PART OF A 1031 TAX DEFERRED EXCHANGE FOR THE GRANTOR HEREIN. DATED: May 3V, 1997 '-0---. t ---Z—v..) Marlene A. Landon WASMINGTUN COUNTY 4r !' R'fAL OFOPERTY T!'ANSf£i9 T X � '' $135:2 o p 3 '1' FE1 PAID WI STATE OF O GON COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on : "�`�'`'`�J``�-`"`�`�1"—s(j g 1� OFRCIAt SEAL ( : ;F JEANNE M.FLEISCNMAN 1 _ 30 1 l�i4 7 ( �—�',- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 1 . COMMISSION NO 044858 y i \ p MY COMMIS;IOrI E�Q'IRES.IULY 13,1999 9 if, -h • • 13A. L Pa.Jtao r� NOTARY PUBL C FOR OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1-i3 9 S /V&rrS, ✓('� LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT EXPANSION July 16, 1997 NARRATIVE 1. In September 1996 a permit was granted to build an employee and customer parking area between SW Franklin Street and SW Dartmouth Street and between SW 68th Avenue and SW 69th Avenue. That project is nearing completion. Now an additional .40 acres was acquired at the NE corner of the original project. The current project proposed will develop the .40 acres with employee and customer parking so it ties into the original project. A separate minor modification is being submitted to make the original project work with this new one. The proposed project will add 3 net spaces. The current zoning is mixed use employment. 2. The site is located in the Tigard Triangle at the intersection of Dartmouth and 68th Avenue. 3. The property is bordered by 68th Avenue, Dartmouth and the Landmark Ford parking lot under construction. The residential structure on the property will be removed. 4. The proposed parking lot improvements will generally slope to the south and west consistent with the existing topography. The parking lot will be of asphalt paving with extruded curbs. Access to the property will be from the adjacent parking lot. There will not be any entrances or exits onto existing city streets. There are no street improvements necessary. Sidewalk improvements are proposed for the project to complete the sidewalk from 68th to 69th and from Elmhurst to Dartmouth. 5. The property is the dominant visual focus in the Dartmouth- 1-5 portal for vehicles exiting I-5 south. It currently has an attractive canopy of mature trees and the major focus for landscaping is to preserve those trees and the existing canopy. Consequently, street trees will only be added along a small area on the west side of 68th and Dartmouth that lacks the canopy of mature trees. The trees proposed are red sunset maples on 68th Avenue and incense cedar on Dartmouth. Additional plantings will be made along 68th as indicated on the landscape plan with decorative shrubs and flowers to complement and complete the entire frontage on 68th from Dartmouth to Franklin street. 6. There will be no buffers since the site only borders street and parking area. Existing vegetation that may interfere with a clear vision area between 3 to 8 feet will be trimmed and maintained. 7. Because of the excess landscaping areas to maintain mature trees to dominate the site, no additional parking space trees are planned. 8. -Proposed storm drainage improvement consist of draining to detention pond via biofiltration swale. Storm water improvements will be consistent with Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County design standards for phosphorus removal and will utilize existing drainage ways after onsite treatment. Swales plant types will utilize some existing vegetation and will be consistent with USA recommendations. Soil types for the area are typically silty loams which will provide good soil conditions for these type of facilities. Proposed improvement consist of piping the outfall to the previously approved piping that drains to an existing drain on 68th Avenue. 9. Sanitary sewer is not required for this project. 10. Onsite lighting for this project is also proposed. Lighting will be consistent with current industry standards. 11. Since less than 25% of 12"trees are being removed, no tree mitigation is required. 12. Since the proposed project only adds 13 net parking spaces to the combined sites of both projects, there is no measurable impact on any public facilities or sewers. The original approved application called for 83 parking spaces, the total for both projects combined is 96. The original approved lot called for 31,048 square feet of impervious surface on this parcel. The new application adds 15,372 square feet for a total of 46,420 square feet of impervious surface between Dartmouth and Elmhurst. . , 1 P \ `:),... .4..? : NI / \ 4 -' vs Vr. ' \ I et— X ., Al , X ' 1 N - - \ k ‘ ‘ 1 TA 1 ‘:\\ - \ \ \‘ -' '\ \'' : \ , , I I 1 I , . ' Al 2 ■ ■ _. H ..... k, +‘ I f 41111 >----- ----4 .. - tl ,, lial 1 ADDITIONAL PROPERTY -v.! - ---- II II 1 _• RECENTLY ACQUIRED '1 1` ' I 1 ■ ‘, , ) 1 -,. ■III I 1 ' •b- eeOLI i le-i'07 gills 1 1 , -liv, N troyhtefio, . ' • • : ‘ ,. ' 1 f ‘• fa Si P/ I al' ■ W 11111 4 t .."1 I . ., Li_ .I i = % "'At°7r5 A2 ...IL- ,., \ l■ ea) 2p If OP „it 4- ' I / • \ DA% . i I 1 ' .. , PROPOSED PARKING 01 / , , ,. ,.. 1 89 STANDARD SPAC S ; + • \ ' • 7 HANDICAPPED SPA E \ .. i ,- - I , , •,...: ...• ,- ' \ 1 1 , . 1,- I 4 + r , • IIIP%;lk 4 1 l. • yl t— I ': —s6— -S1W- ST-S-, T 0 1 , 5 ../ - SCALE: 1"=60' REFERENCE SHEET NO. N/A TITLE: DATE: kpff Consulting Engineers LANDMARK FORD SITE PLAN 7/24/97 111 SW. Filth Avenue Suite 2500 LANDMARK FORD SHEET NO. Portland, Oregon 97204 503-227-3251 12000 SW 66TH AVENUE 11GARD, OR 97281 pro IPro Jed LAND It'A1 f 4 FU-n W4NS� B h Al Sheet No. • (=anon r I - y) Dab G/q) / Consulting Engineers Client Lq R 0 v 16 p IZ- 0 Portland.Oregon Revlted JCob SNaV ‘9 U� DE E ffrj nt C i L(1)( l d v c Dab GRI&JAJ, o4PER vroos '4f2f4 _ 4°3°1' '"7(4 7 Ai 9I rtONA- . irtle Rviou AIRc r� lac DE i Alec "'5?max ,, � � _ S 37 Z� t--r, = G. ?S. • cRE$ f)� SIGN S- - -- EvtAr = 0. Hi2S ) r= 96, kRt ESrlM rE,) t2UAvoj - Q = c 19 • r - O. ?t,"/yniz D 35" 0 -- (0. )(d.69)(0. .?S) = O. 028 cFS PUNP VOLu<,E s-)PUh VOLun-jt - (9 . 3C, ") ( ► �r� ( is3) Z Fr`) = y62 ►2- Foniv - Rkt( uiRtU L/8 it2 f Q = _ Laez FT 3 6. 002,-? cFS `18 1J s)( 6,0 r-liVrtrz)(LO Stc ORtE.c cizt D (?. -- �. u� 1 ( Q 6. a") 1 o. ?) 1''1- = a . Misr, IFIrt 1 USE Mtn. 3/,1 0t2inc PgrVth„- Pa ��c ry (4%, 6 c (1/94) RECEIVED PLANNING agConsulting Engineers AUG 12 1997 CITY OF TIGARD July 25, 1997 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Landmark Ford Parking Lot Improvements Dear Mark: This letter is an addendum to the minor modification response issued on July 7, 1997, and is a narrative describing the general modifications made to the original Landmark Ford north parking lot currently under construction. The following changes are: 1. The handicapped parking spaces were moved from the southwest corner to the southeast corner in order to provide better handicapped access to the intersection of SW 68th Avenue and SW Elmhurst Street. 2. With the additional property (northeast of the original site) recently acquired, the impervious area of the original site is now less than originally proposed. 3. With the additional property (northeast of the original site) recently acquired, the number of parking spaces in the original site is now less than originally proposed. 4. The setbacks along the north and northeast property lines are now 5 feet. The setback along the north property line in the original plan was approximately 13 feet. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me. Sincerely, 1-1-C. Aaron Eder Civil Designer AE/be\95069.04\min-mod.Itr 111 S W Fifth Avenue. Suite 2500 Portland, OR 97204-3628 (503) 227-3251 Fax (503) 227-7980 Seattle Portland San Francisco Los Angeles Phoenix San Diego Ju 1-28-97 09: 59A _ 50329R/38120 P _ 02 BAUGH CONSTRUCTION OREGON, INC. Estimate Type: Preliminary Budget Architect: KPFF - Project: Landmark Ford - North Parking Lot Expansion Estimator G. Childress Location: Tigard, Oregon Gross SF: 17.500 Attention: Rich Brooks - Description Cost Cost/SF ! Division 2: Sitework $66.958 $1.22 Division 3: Concrete SO $0.00 Division 4 Masonry $0 $0.00 Division 5: Metals SO $0.00 Division 6: Wood & Plastics $0 $0 00 Division 7. Thermal/Moisture Control $0 $0.00 Division 8: Doors & Windows 50 $0.00 Division 9: Finishes SO S0.00 Division 10: Specialties $0 $0.00 Division 11: Equipment SO 50.00 Division 12: Furnishings SO $0.00 Division 14: Conveying Systems $0 $0.00 Division 15: Mechanical $0 $0.00 Division 16: Electrical 515.000 $0.27 Subtotal 581.958 $1.49 General Conditions 54.098 $0 07 Subtotal $86,056 $1.56 Fee $4.303 $0.08 Insurance $732 $0.01 TOTAL 591.091 I $1.66 Specific Exclusions: I. Preliminary pricing does not include public works upgrades and half street improvements if required. 2. Preliminary pricing is for permit purposes only. Final costs will be determined through bid process Contractors Standard Exclusions: 1. Cost of Band 9. Mechanical & Electrical Design 2. Building Permit& Plan Check Fees 10. Owner's Legal & Financing Costs 3. Systems Development& LID Costs 11. Soils Report 4 Utility Connection Fees 12. Rock Excavation 5. Power Company Charges 13. Environmental Assessment Survey 6. Testing & Inspection Costs 14. Hazardous & Toxic Waste Removal 7. Builder's Risk Insurance Premiums 15. Removal of Soil Contaminated by & Deductibles Hazardous or Toxic Wastes 8. Architect & Engineer Fees This is a budget estimate. A contingency has not been included File Name: Parkb.xls Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/28/97 9:59 AM Ju7'-28-97 09: 59A _ 5037• 88120 P _ 03 BAUGH CONSTRUCTION OREGON, INC. Project: Landmark Ford - North Parking Lot Expansion Architect: KPFF Location: Tigard, Oregon Estimator G. Childress Description Qnty Unit Unit Cost Cost DIVISION 2: S1TEWORK ' Demolish Existing Structures 1 al $2,500.00 $2,500 _ Earthwork and Clearing 17,500 sf $2.00 $35.000 Site Utilities - Storm Sewer 15,372 sf $0.35 $5,380 Asphalt Paving 2" wI 8" Rock 1,708 sy $9.75 $16,653 Extruded Curbs 825 If $1.90 $1.568 Pavement Marking - Stalls 13 ea $4.00 , $52 Pavement Marking - Walks etc. 1.200 sf $2.00 $2,400 Landscaping and Irrigation 2,128 sf $1.60 $3,405 subtotal $66,958 DIVISION 3: CONCRETE subtotal $0 DIVISION 4: MASONRY subtotal $0 DIVISION 5: METALS subtotal $0 'DIVISION 6: WOOD & PLASTICS subtotal $0 DIVISION 7: THERMAUMOISTURE PROTECTION subtotal $0 DIVISION 8: DOORS & WINDOWS subtotal $0 DIVISION 9: FINISHES subtotal $0 DIVISION 10: SPECIALTIES subtotal $0 DIVISION 11: EQUIPMENT subtotal $0 File Name Parkb.xls Page 1 of 2 Date: 7/28/97 9:59 AM 3u1 •-28-97 09: 59A _ 5032888120 P _ 04 BAUGH CONSTRUCTION OREGON, INC. Project: Landmaek Ford - North Parking Lot Expansion Architect: KPFF Location: Tigard. Oregon Estimator. G. Childress Description Onty Unit Unit Cost Cost • DIVISION 12: FURNISHINGS subtotal $0 DIVISION 14: CONVEYING SYSTEMS subtotal $0 DIVISION 15: MECHANICAL subtotal $0 DIVISION 16: ELECTRICAL Site Lighting - Poles 6 ea $2,500.00 $15,000 subtotal $15,000 File Name: Parkb.xis Page 2 of 2 Date: 7128/97 9:59 AM Arborist's Report Landmark Ford 12000 SW 66th Ave Tigard, OR 97281 Employee Parking as per site plan by KPFF Consulting Engineers Report Prepared By DelWayne Rassi City Wide Tree Service Inc. 8626 SE 30th Milwaukee, OR 97222 I.S.A. Certified Arborist # PN-0258 Report Contents Tree Plan: 1) Identification of the location, size, and species of all existing trees. 2) Identification of mitigation requirements for tree removal over 12" caliper. 3) Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed. 4) Tree Protection Program to protect trees during and after construction Identification of location size and species of existing trees. See map for location using corresponding tree numbers listed below. Tree#1-24" White Oak Tree#25-8" Willow Tree#2-12" Willow Tree#26-10" Oregon Ash Tree#3-12" Coast Pine Tree#27-10" Oregon Ash Tree#4-10" Coast Pine Tree#28-16"-10"White Oak Tree#5-5" Coast Pine Tree#6-4" Coast Pine Tree#7-30" White Oak Tree#8-16" Native Cherry Tree#9-12"-9" White Oak Tree#10-30" Western Red Ceder Tree#11-6" Spruce Tree#12-19" White Oak Tree#13-30" White Oak Tree#14-10" Oregon Ash Tree#15-12" Oregon Ash Tree#16-14" White Oak Tree#17-7"Hawthorne Tree#18-24" White Oak Tree#19-12" White Oak Tree#20-9" Douglas Fir Tree#21-24" White Oak Tree#22-5"-5"-7" White Oak Tree#23-7" Douglas Fir Tree#24-10" Birch Identification of mitigation requirements for trees over 12" caliper that are to be removed. Existing trees over 12" caliper Tree#1-24" White Oak Tree#2-12" Willow Tree#3-12" Coast pine Tree#7-30" White Oak Tree#8-16" Native Cherry Tree#9-12"-9" White oak Tree#10-30" Western Red Ceder Tree#12-19" White Oak Tree#13-30" White Oak Tree#15-12" Oregon Ash Tree#16-14" White Oak Tree#18-24" White Oak Tree#19-12" White Oak Tree#21-24" White Oak Tree#22-5"-5"-7" White Oak Tree#28-16"-10" White Oak Total caliper size=323" Trees over 12" caliper listed for removal. Tree#1-24" White Oak L.) Tree#2-12" Willow a1 Tree#3-12" Coast pine Tree#16-14" White Oak Total caliper size of Trees removed over 12" caliper=62" • Based on caliper size % of trees over 12" caliper being retained----80.8%. Based on number of trees % of trees over 12" caliper being retained=75%. As listed above and according to this plan no tree mitigation would be required for this project. In reference to city standards stating that retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation Identification of all trees proposed for removal. See map for location using corresponding tree numbers listed below. Tree#1-24" White Oak Tree#2-12" Willow Tree#3-12" Coast Pine Tree#4-10" Coast Pine Tree#5-5" Coast Pine Tree#6-4" Coast Pine Tree#16- 14" White Oak Tree#17-7" Hawthorne Tree#25-8" Willow Tree#26-10" Oregon Ash Tree#27-10" Oregon Ash Tree Protection Program Before construction: 1) Put in place a four foot high chain link or plastic snow fence around the groves of trees to be protected. Grove number one includes trees 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 28. Grove two includes trees 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 23, and 24. The tree protection fence is placed at or just outside of the drip line of the trees in the grove, and surrounds the entire grove. 2) Put in place a four foot high chain link or plastic snow fence around individual trees that are to be protected. This includes tree number 7, 8 and 9. Fence is placed just beyond the drip line and surrounds the entire tree. 3) I would recommend putting up tree protection fencing around the trees south of this project if they are intended for preservation. I have labeled these trees on the map as 29, 30, 31 , 32, 33, 34, 35,and 36. These trees are not actually part of this project. 4) No heavy Equipment or grading should be allowed inside the tree protection fencing. No storage equipment or heavy foot traffic should be allowed inside the tree protection fencing. 5) If trenching for utilities must take place inside the protected areas it must be supervised by a certified arborist to insure care for roots that may require pruning. During construction: 1) Tree protection fencing must be maintained. 2) A certified arborist should be called on site if any damage occurs to a tree's root system, trunk section, or canopy. This is to insure proper care for the tree and to assess damage that may cause the tree to be hazardous. 3)Protecting the tree from sitting in water is important to the health of the trees. The construction of the holding pond/drainage system should not adversely affect these trees as long as water being held is below the natural grade of the trees and outside the trees drip line. After construction: 1) Before any landscaping occurs the trees should be pruned to remove deadwood and to correct any hazardous situations. 2) The trees should be monitored and inspected for health and hazards once a year for 2 to 5 years after construction. Conclusion After visiting the site at Landmark Ford and studying the site plan I feel confident that this can work and still preserve over 75% of all existing trees that are over 12 inch caliper. My main concern for the trees at this project is that the water drainage holding pond not cause flooding into the root zone of the trees in Grove 1 and Grove 2. If the pond is below the grade level of the trees in these groves and the pond does not extend past the trees drip line then I do not see a problem. Sincerely, G DelWayne Rassi City Wide Tree Service Inc. I.S.A. Certified Arborist #PN-0258 \ \ \ ,.\ 621. '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ (6, f' 1. 35' TOP: .20 282 78 TOP 272.02 622 - NC OAK dTON 2)3.36 ,� 7"rc�.5 ou�� ►t. cam„ r � 35 ''..'''T-'""ss--------------•.. Aw- ze7 76 j /r _ / '- C teed!". 16"CHERRY 611 ,f - --•-.„.... 7 T ' //X' ' . •••'''''''''''''''' 623 •6 278.19 / Iii.e7 (� "TOP �.,� • � .•' ' f 929 ! res- - d .' ll �.✓ 1....x'3- r' . tni, r ,..,gm. / -- 1 • ' a 63 I I z FOUN� S/8'• TH •�te1 CE N► ,,,,..V.87 ,y OAK s�30"CEDAR W.B. WE .-. .. ....� 756 898 ry/ 909 • •,3.Y ,.. •!. ,..x797.�� •260.26 -� ]O/ S,+ dp'2J EB 8 ME - /e9R WE 61 7 6'.'° _ - -- \ 6._-. � •HD 5/91R 0,4k `E� /8 se FOUND 5 "IR WITH YE'C 696 ! .............. W.D. l7�LLS i GARAGE$W P. . p1N• ��`/�/ �./ f6 5 TOP + u'2e2.9 289.12... So • E 898 ,f ...._......... t , ..: o rt /111 i Z ' 921 - ‘ '''•,-"ego „ li -.. • .. :Ib4.21 `2e7 ♦v,. , 901 296.02 ec o / ,'e91 • 287.'x5 CARAT/, ,,,/02 OND �,,.. �, 266.09 SET :94 XEOCEiE6 a*� .•r ....� .... - 924 "5? . .............;.... ,,• :' rBO]95 �iN E TOE,: St {, ouSE Sw __ __ .. 91 H R• 9}1 930 ..926 • Ot 72RLa6,,r ^760 899 . .. T41 9BlD( �1�/� 292-06 . •26e.e1 ' ° E9J 02 O 917 1v .�,. « / r' r!' .t,•`:. % 6 w `L.293.1 G t`: 29JF/n •291I6P ' ti1,�17 A9/ 5, :.•-,�aA COQ / 09'692, .66162+ 291.02 I�2 Y , 6 ,,,�IIOOrr 7 iY f ''A - - - OUSE COR '79 N Cie /ftft■ `� LS69 .%BBB J 12.70 LS9 BEC 1(, Ly0 '''44,' q f n a4 . . • 1 2nA. \-4' ',.//'� � !�A I e79 676 e7{ z9)s2 '~` . / ; ... ... 293.20 • 291 EGaEB r / 7p1.10 em :"M6WY NE EC HE d l`-_ � . / v ..980 m 7'. �c Y63 t ....292.78 • 1.4 l[[.1.66 2 i1. V� • . ..5+53.7.OAK / •91.86 650 �.:. 7.4'W TO : •4}Nb 5 :°I C I YP C I 251. �� �J` • Al. I _'.:0' /A 670 .G' 676 S 3. o, 24' FE9 y. � � '662 Top .. _._.r • RR< ec. 797.99 \\v........\ /2/.5% L'il•192 r••-.,...„1"214APLL ... ,..;1EA s 0 .ea.v.e.....- ....-„, ,,./.......eih. 502 SZ Afrfc._in7.-- ____....-- 0 1 T._ ..._ _ --1 275.23 H0US COR ,--7c G.- , /104t.....-0-- r /441 CON: )4, L re SerVe0(. ::>14,r; : ,.. 1.._ ---1,1 • /t P ‘ / a//f- kb j —1 HOUSE DTA•„, ••••••...,, cc rPAME _ RrSIDEN(.:E. 491 — 0 277 614 .36 ,.:'. • 276.59 I CIF DOR II-2 HOUSE COFT i.:11 16 ',.d. HOU COR a_ Ki• . •-/, :14.7 .. ,...........--. ,,,....., •,,,,,....................„ ..... '''. i • • - • . / ,,--114t1 , ......... .••..txr,..........._. i .... ... . ......... ..,, , . '' 'I'INAT , •••,., • 91 t'j , ."4129 / --2711.710-- ;4• kb isitz :.___S7143 / ... DUCH ..."'1,,... ..„...... :0 111. t.i..AGI 580 • 'CEDAR '/ ......... -3, ........... ........._.. COR , ....xwo.......................„,..„ ...., 111112113649%4 16E .... .. .... , .,............ •281.23 .7.4b ...........--- '--,M.P IILLO .-......-......... . ....... .-..................-. . •...,s . --.....„....-...„..,.............. . .........,...............,...... ..........--.--------....... ..-....- `,... \ /' . ................„...,. ' ........— ...........-- .....................,...„- .......4,/ ......„........„,..--.......„. --, Fouy's 5/8"1R WITH YPC .............__________ ....,....„, ................ , ..•,„,. w.:/ WELLS (DISTURBED) ....,_, ........„-,............... ...... ...................................... \ \ ... --- ' ISO„.,....,-......... --......--................................... 149 . „ ...............,. '' •......, ,291399- .TOP 0 — 6, 7003 -.,,,i IIILIOW / TOP „ •. ( .- ----\21,,..,:' , ,i,,, •",, ' '• N • / 0 / I \ I 1• t4 . .1 A s„ 1 . \ ... ASH 44./I 1120 . I \ \ ; -2E7.44 i ‘`. \ ,u . NO 1 / 159 • \ \ X \X ` , : t. \ ), X • t. t : 1 • s :,1,L06.1„. i t•illit 290.43 NC • ‘ \ i ; NO \ \ \ , \ \ ..„ „ ,,:v,i . ... i fr • se ; .. . \ ..,, \ • r .....- \ \ . M \ . - ••-• \ / • fr _ -tf• .•',. - -... . _ PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ;,t,tmJt"�tUr`C' mmunity NON-RESIDENTIAL CATE b/-74 q 7 STS: G"'tik? • APPLICANT: L a Lid 14444-4 AGENT: K 6(4$-L4/4"441 ��ea•"• S U Phone:( l ti 3(7- 113/ Phone: [ 122-7- 3-25 / PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: SL(O 5't-0 1.04r1-+-• 0e)A 5'4veet- _ 93 �l o s tr TAX MAP/TAX LOT: -2,5*( ( 1 1 7 Lod / 2 600 2 766 i,,2A . . NECESSARY APPLICAT1ON[Sl: s; 1.ve10 • 144 t U ei/ e,- 'ie,L,4) s ` • I rf r-/. 11 /r.,ti bl 're 0 / - . / I I r/ 4-t■ J&410) l ` Sl b� 5 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: i � II la y /0 I—+o A r�✓ous�p� � / to/ 144 Lees! 14 JA z-t COMPREHENSIVE � r PLAN DESIGNATION: v V l i ed (1�Q 1,,,t le �,ftea71 r ZONING DESIGNATION: W I , .(p) lJ .e_. C Ltt 1 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Ca-S FACILITATOR: Se e- TEAM AREA PHONE: [5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: lq sq. ft. / Average lot width: ft. Maximum building height:_�� ftSetbacks: Front n/a ft. Side 11 ft. Rear k q ft. Corner tj ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: �S 6666/o Minimum landsbaped or natural vegeta.fio�n area: (s [Refer to e4a�slion it.. 1 io wie —s clot 145 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONALRIIQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a pa'tition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. depth of all lots shaft not exceed 2r times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district: [Refer to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residentlal apollcatloa/PlaunIne Osnnrcmeei Section SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: 4. I feet from the centerline of 11 1 a . - . Established areas: feet from N 4 . Lower intensity zones: i, feet. along the site's h a boundary. Flag lot: 10-foot side yard setback. [Refer to Code Section and 18.96] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual building setbacks will be at least half(yt) of the building's height; and The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.98.020] PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: 14 Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): 11 Secondary use required parking: 1411 Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): K/ f No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking to s s all be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.020] .-----) Handicappe• -ar i •. All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions. are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicy e`ra-- squired forte mily, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be • - ed in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be pro ided on the basis of o,- • - .- : - .7.- • --- - -: .• 7.- - .' . .. k i n. spaces. z Minimum number of accesses: 0 h 2- Minimum access width: �0 . Minimum pavement width: ) LI/ All driveways and parking a71s, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areal . [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108] CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-leshlutlal applIcaUse/Plinisi Wannest Section WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS Walkways shall exten. from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs. ramps or elevators of all comme .ial, institutional, and industrial uses. to the streets which provide the required - access and egress Walk. ays shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial. institutional, an. ' dustrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development an• neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.108.05 I f LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10.000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at .1 road/driveway, road/railroad. and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area 1 depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. / [Refer to Code Section 18.102) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required: these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities. and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) The require buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. Lj/� feet along east boundary. fr/lQ feet along south boundary. � g feet along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along LANDSCAPING ----� Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms. decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18100.18.106 and 18.1081 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 MON-1ssllsotlal application Maui!Osgrtasot Section SIGNS Sign permits must be tained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is ava ble upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be - permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code Section 18.1141\ SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference lased on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential developm t is prohibited within floodplains. [Refer to Code Section 18.84] STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.B. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 118.84.04Q,.,13.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA] FFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 Purpose: Land development adjacent sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to pro ect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of 4 portion of the vegetated corridor, then e surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25�feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No\more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: No structures, development, construction activities, garde , lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 018 MON-Residential application/Planning Department Section Location of V-.-t-t-d •rrijQr: In any residential develop ent which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such _ as a subdivision, the vegeta :d corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the const ction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regu .tions-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition. site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees: Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that , two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; * Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.0; Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation: Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect I trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be ' viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged. by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement '\ trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property. the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city. either . public property or, with the consent of the owner. private property. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Resldentlol oppllcotloeirlanning Redartment Section The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow I growth to maturity. _ In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.010[Dl SUBDIVISION PLAT NINE RESERVATION Prior to subm. ting a Subdivision land use application with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and i a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approv /reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City rece es the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. ---'County Surveyor's Office: 648-88841 NARRATIVE r:1 The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS � � 18.80 18.92 X18 00 18.108 � 18.120 ✓18.150 18.84 18.96 1---15.,-1-02 18.114 18.130 18.160 18.88 18.98 ►/18.106 18.116 18.134 18.162 - 18.164 IMPACT STUDY _ As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways. the drainage system. the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems. and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code_re wires thP_dedicatio of real DrOperty_ interests. • -e applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not rou•hiy proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32.Section.0501 When a condition of approval requirs transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which sup••rt the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.250) . NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] __ CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 M011-Residentlel application/Planning Dsgnrtmant Section BUILDING PERMITS Plans for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has I I been issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. RECYCLING. Applic nt.\should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Section 18.116) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: QN,O/iIST sorI i V Q Ui f • Walk 0 a . .� 1' PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT bq accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF MAIM Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 4011-Oesideptlel applicatisn/►lepp111 Department Secttep • The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or - protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public peal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard j/Q.0 j41 kt /44 SS c . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process ig available from the Planing Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thin pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following this conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: '7/Raj G4 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISI N PHONE: (5031639-4171 FAX: [5031684-7297 il:\i ogle\patty\masters\preepp-C ast [Engineering Section:mestere\preenp-C.eegl 11-Mar-91 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 MOM-eesieeetlel leolicatloe/1lseeug Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: (N1 if Date: 4/7 2 APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 2a E) Filing Fee $ See (SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 1. Vicinity map ✓� 2. Site size & dimensions [Q� 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 0 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLICATION V LIST PACE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development F . Indicating: No. of Copies 2-0 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties [.1/ 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ❑ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: / (a) Entrances and exits on the site ,/m� (b) Parking and circulation areas ,/ (c) Loading and services area ❑ (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation - � (e) Outdoor common areas o (f) Above ground utilities �Q1_.-- 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 1 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ('� 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ 8. The location areas to be landscaped t1--- 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes a 11 . The location of ail structures and their orientation mod/ 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) E1--------- (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development T- 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ _ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposal (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigate LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Draw; - dicating: No. of Copies The site developmel ,,ian roposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the uare footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating:g No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable _g/_/ 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings m/ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials ✓ 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Si: Drawin:s: ❑ Sig drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Buil ing Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Gen• .tion Estimate: ❑ H) Prelimina Partiti.n/Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. Indicatin:: No. of Copies 1. The owner of t ,e subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's auth. ized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,5o, 10 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel loca '•n and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width and names •f streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to e parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanent buil.'ngs on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all water cou -s ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or great- caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easement ❑ 11. For major land partition which creates a public stre (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus a reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future -nd division where applicable ❑ LAND LSE APPLICATION.'LIST PACE 3 OF 5 1) Subdivision Prelimi - • Plat Map and Data Indicating: 'o. of Copies 1 . Scale equaling ,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed nam of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showi g property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdi ision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-s divided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a ity-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for par , open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles o proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indica d on the plans ❑ 1 1 . Plan of the proposed water distrib tion system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hyd ,nts ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles shoWing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed stre t right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inu dation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of Clow of a water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approxi ate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used f r purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 1 ches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location f proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including t e location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, we lands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicabl be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND 115E APPLICATION/LIST PACE 4 OF 5 (I\ J) Solar Access Calcula 'ons: O K) Other Information No. of Copies—Z-0 Lov 5t- h:Vogin\patty\nasterAltidistmst may 23.1995 LAND USE APPLICATION./UST PAGE 5 OF 5 Z- ( IAPB 1 , City of Tigard, Oregon PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: (X) street improvements will be necessary along Sw DAzT,.A Jzrl �C- street improvements will be necessary along SK/ (f)e Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), .�y p a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector Y� r_ rjSri-� �j 5 M4 CL �pI. SI O�V.n'4.-t Itilyl � -12.Ee� AJt) � �✓ /1.0e4.∎i Y tF �C UurM-<61 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department Section streets, or in the CL .al Business District), necessary str signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW LT -I ` (sue . Prior to 15su +..c f' krC — , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) � � l (' Ati^e (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: 64:=5-K- The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineering Department Section Water Supply: CMI,cE gi„siz The ■ Water District - Phone:(503) (v4`j-An I provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. • Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineering Department Section • 65 percent of the phospl, -s contained in 100 percent of th, storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water • quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Department. Building Department Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more ' detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: - 47 ENGINEERING DEP RTMENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 h:\togi n\patty\preapp.eng (Master section preapp-r mst) December 23,1996 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engmeenng Department Section i , t ----^ I / 1 \':: 1 ■ . s \ 4 -) op� II \ X •IP .141 - (- �..... �r R . \% \ ) �* � 51 D I A ► `. . ., 14 ,� PROPOSED [ f �► s '. ■ 1- ,,. I, PARKING LOT r i t- el � , ADDITION �: • 31 . . 1 .. t.„1,, , ..f r ! 1 ` IN 11144 t .1 PI- : = 1 . Z 1 , l' : a 4 I t �� i } ; \ \ -- --71 111- -----. . r _ $ + r I ' 0 I . f ' r I t _ \\\\\ _ : r = e I .�\\.\ ! r f i. ��� i I � x , • „ 9 ♦ ` •,r•, ' a _ - -- = --WA=ELMHUR . ' 3 SCALE: 1"=60' REFERENCE SHEET NO. N/A TITLE: DATE: kp fir t;ting LANDMARK FORD SITE PLAN 7/24/97 Sate 2500 LANDMARK FORD SHEET NO. Portland. Oregon 17204 503.227-3251 12000 SW 66TH AVENUE TIGARD, OR 97281 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS II' .« . . tr.-3."' • • ., • . .. . .. . - - ....0,'-. - .• .. . :. 4. .... 1.....• ..1; ...AI*I; ' ylp. .•.‘ . • f••. .-r, ,• ...I f.- 4.r. Air 1..‘ • ., I •• . - •.4r,' 14. .1 •' 0..",et. '—• • 406 . ai 4• .-,, .. • 4.....Adeur• - -.• ....'. _ ;........„... .,„,.,.... _--- ...I. ------- ---- - . -.....0 .-..• _ . ....-' - _..... .... (,.r =fir . b.a it •7 + iirillii4IP''' ..' ■'. . I e n n a southwest ZR 9r64(-9a ' sixth architecture company avenue t r a n s m i t t a l portland oregon 97204.1602 503.227.5616 I fax 503.227.3590 I archsienna.com project name: Landmark Ford Parkinglots addition project no.: 95035 from: Michael Lee date: 06.23.97 no. of via: mail standard pages/items: to: Mark Roberts fax no: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 the following items are enclosed no of copies date of material description 1 06.23.97 Cover letter 1 06.23.97 original of the Affidavits of Posting and mailing 1 06.23.97 8 1/2x11 Copy of the posted sign 1 06.23.97 Copy of Letters mailed out and the list of property owners etc. 1 06.23.97 Letter of permission from Jim Corliss remarks cc: if enclosures are not as noted,please contact Sienna Architecture Company MCL I Document3 I 06.23.97 page 1 411 southwest 23 June 1997 sixth avenues portliest oregon 117204.11102 • 503.227.5616 fax 503.227.3590 I a rchsien na.com City of Tigard Mark Roberts 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: An addition to the Landmark Ford Employee parking lot Project. Dear Mark, I am following through with some of the requirements for the design review of the proposed addition to the Landmark Ford Employee parking lot project. I have enclosed the original signed sienna re Affidavit of Posting Notice, as well as a 8 1/2x11 size copy of the notice sign. The sign was posted arch itectu company on Monday June the 23rd 1997 on the newly acquired property in front of the north parking lot development, 100' from the corner of SW 68th Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street. I have also included a copy of a fax sent to me by Jim Corliss, giving me promotion to act on his behalf. I sent out the notices to all the property owners and residents with in 250' of the subject site as well as the East CIT members. I have enclosed a copy of the letter that was sent out as well as the list of property owners. I have also enclosed the original Affidavit of Mailing. Please call If you have any questions or comment, or require an further information at this time. Sincerely, olie Michael Lee cc: Jim Corollas MCL I C:\Msoffice\Winword\Lm4.Doc 06.23.97 • Meeting Notice Landmark Ford is Proposing a site development for an addition to an already approved parking lot development, located between 68th and 69th Avenue, SW Dartmouth Street and SW Franklin Street. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for necessary permits, the applicants would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and Residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Monday, July 7th, 1997 Landmark Ford 12000 SW 66th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 5 :00 p.m . Jim Corl i ss, Landmark Ford, Inc. 639-1131 Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 5035988363 06/18/97 WED 12:53 FAX 50359 33 LANDMARK FORD J COR 3 Q 001 --..1 ---------4.1-77:4c0 fingqiNTgl) . . 1[11!!!!!!! d -k * JUN181997 • sienna architecture FAX COVER SHEET t / TO: 5-(j.,11/0.A0) DATE (///��� ATTN: Oit-4 _ _r- FAX# _,,I.„2 7 35-110 FROM: Jim Corliss FAX /i 503 598-8363 This transmission consists of pages including this one , if problems receiving, call 503 639-1131 . REMARKS ___Z/t4,12- /-,--ebd __,it Otz_ ,, � : ,Aka. 7 ,L.,,.. ice_ _. i.," 7A., J ifr,...,,,ta.„„ c,,,,() /4.,,,ekt-00-7,-,,_, ot.i 440",„z...,___ (/./?;-6-4;/ lie "Satisfaction is our main concern" 12000 SW. Iifit.h Ave. • P.O.Box 23970 • Tigard. Oregon 97281-:7970 • (503) 639.1131 • FAX (503) 598-8368 sienna southwest sixth o f f i c e architecture company avenue m e m o r a n d u m portland oregon 97204.1602 503.227.5616 I fax 503.227.3590 I archsienna.com to: MCL from: LDS project name: project no.: date: 06.23.97 re: Mailing List Here is the list of names that I mailed your Neighborhood Meeting to for Landmark Ford: Craig Hopkins Mark F. Mahon Pat Wyden 7430 SW Varns 11310 SW 91st Court 8122 SW Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 James L. & Cora K. Corliss Ken & Marilyn Rosenfeld Richard L. Carpenter P.O. Box 23970 11930 Sw 70th Avenue 1834 SW 58th Avenue, #202 Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97221 Donald Pollock &Julia Gail Northland Homes, Inc. Allen & Raymond Fuegy 1834 SW 58th Avenue, #202 1834 SW 58th Avenue, #202 12480 SW 68th Avenue, #A Portland, OR 97221 Portland, OR 97221 Tigard, OR 97223 John & Ella Snyder Michael Denton,Jr. Nellie B. Andrews 12170 SW 69th Avenue P.O. Box 1768 12485 SW 67th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Tigard, OR 97223 Geraldine Johnson Jacob T. &Theresa A. Roth BLB Corporation 10300 SE Waverly Court, #408 12540 SW 68th Avenue, #B 8200 NE Sandy Boulevard Milwaukie, OR 97222 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland, OR 97220 Cecil & Donna Jones Marlene A Landon Mildred Perry 12190 SW 69th Avenue 6210 SW River Road 8439 SW 61st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR 97123 Portland, OR 97219 Richard C. Louie Jacob T. Roth,Jr. 8860 SW Bomar Court 12540 SW 68th Avenue, #B Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Let me know if you need anything else. cc: A I Document? I 00.00.00 page 1 of 1 411 southwest 20 June 1997 sixth avenue portlaad oregal! 17204.1602 • 503.227.5616 I fax 503.227.3590 I archsienn a.cOM Jacob T. Roth,Jr. 12540 SW 68th Avenue, #B Tigard, OR 97223 re: Landmark Ford Parking Lot Addition Dear Interested Party: Jim Corliss of Landmark Ford, Inc. is the owner of the Property Located between 68th and 69th sienna architecture Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street and SW Franklin Street. Landmark Ford is proposing an company addition to the already approved parking lot development. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, Mr. Corliss would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You area invited to attend a meeting on: Monday,July 7th, 1997 Landmark Ford 12000 SW 66th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 5:00 p.m. Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal in greater detail with you. Please call us a 227-5616 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael Lee cc: Jim Corliss A I H:\Xfr\Lmnotice.Doc 1 06.19.97 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, MICHAEL LEE , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed ADDITION TO AN APPROVED PARKING LOT DEV. affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) THE CORNER OF 68th AVENUE AND SW DARTMOUTH STREET , and did on the 23rd day of JUNE 19 97 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at APPROXIMATELY 100' SOUTH OF DARTMOUTH STREET FACING SW 68TH AVENUE (state location you posted notice on property) .4110!! / Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) 2 c/ Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (.2Z-9 day of , 19'7 • OFFICIAL.SEAL �� ' .. SUSIE WINTERS �, I 10,4 .71 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON COMMISSION NO.044633 W CCIMISSION oRIEsaM 13,103 My Commission Expires: 1 • • • • • .(Applicant. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) TNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT A DDITION 'TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: ADDITION TO AN ALREADY APPROVED PARKING LOT DEVELOPMENT Name of Applicant/Owner: SIM CORLISS OF LANDMARK FORD Address or General Location of Subject Property: THE SW CORNER OF 68th AVENUE & SW DARTMOUTH STREET LSubject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot#(s): WCTM 251 1AA_, TAX LOT 1800 h:11ogIMpatty+mastersaffoost.mst 5035988363 06/18/97 WED 12: 18 FAX 5035£ 63 LANDMARK FORD J COF S [Z1 006 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, MICHAEL LEE , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 23rd DAY OF JUNE , 19 97, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF 68th AVENUE AND SW DARTMOUTH STREET a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 1505 SW 6th AVENUE, UNIVERSITY STATION with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence of a Nota Puublic) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBUC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/amrmed before me on the " \ day of , 19 A *2_1.,, OFFICIAL SEAL Gcd t-[c- 'IL- ti�-� =',_ SUSIE WINTERS ?« NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON LCOMMISSION NO.044633 My Commission Expires: @,-/ 1M 0:1,44 SION DOFFS J JFE 13,101 Aapiics:.r. -lease completz information below for prover placement with proposed project) rNANa: OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: LANDMARK FORD PARKING LOT ADDITION -` !T1'EE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: ADDITION TD AN APPROVED PARKING J.OT DEVET,OPMFNT Name ofApplic ntOwner JIM CORLISS OF LANDMARK FORD �?.dd.-ess or General Lac-Inca of Subject Property THE SW CORNER DF fifth AVENUE END SW DARTMOUTH STREET uojea,?:�ce_.f Tax Mapis)and lot,;(s): WCTM r 1AA, TAX LOST KO Ipjnrk July 8, 1997 Subject : Local property owner site development meeting for Landmark Ford parking lot development located between 68th and 69th avenue , SW Dartmouth st . and SW Franklin st . The meeting was held on July 7 , 1997 at 5 :00 PM at Landmark Ford. The following persons were in attendance : Jim Corliss - site developer Ella and John Snyder - local residents , 12170 SW 69th, Tigard phone 639-4553 The parking lot plans were reviewed . The Snyder ' s requested that the project be done as soon as possible . They were advised that as soon as permits were received it would proceed to completeion. The Snyder ' s were in favor of the overall design of the parking lot which retains most of the old trees and provides some sound screen for their home from the freeway. They expressed concern about the use of the lot around their home at night . They were advised that the lot will be secured by fence and will be lighted and locked at night after dealership working hours to keep both vehicle and foot traffic out . There were no other concerns expressed for the new project . Submitted by Jim Corliss 1111 dedtilb "Satisfaction is our main concern" 12000 S.W.66th Ave. • P.O.Box 23970 •Tigard,Oregon 97281-3970 • (503) 639-1131 • FAX (503) 598-8368 10 0 I-1 G37 I : I 4.PM FROM C FRESHLET LANDARCH SO 3+224+7069 R 2 CHRISTOPHER FRESHLEY L A N D S C A P E - A R C H I T E C T September 30, 1997 Jim Corliss Landmark Ford 12000 SW 66th Tigard. Or 97223 Re: Landmark Ford parking lot expansion Dear Jim: Here are the responses to the conditions of approval from the city of Tigards planning Division 1. Hedge Material a. Blue Girt Holly (flex x meserveae) is a dense evergreen shrub that will meet both the 3'height requirement as well as the 90% opacity requirement_ b. Delavay Holly (Osmanthus delavayi) is also a dense evergreen shrub that will meet both the 3' height requirement as well as the 90% opacity requirement. 2. Groundcover a. Candytuft (lberis sempervirens) and Lithodora (Lithodora diffuse 'Grace Ward') are well suited ground covers and shown at the proper spacing to fully cover the remaining landscape within two years. 3. Trees a. The tree selected for placement along Dartmouth street is the Red Sunset Maple (Acer rubrum Red Sunset), this tree will reach a height of 45'and a width of 35'. This meets the requirement of a broad spreading tree. b. The tree selected for placement along 68th. avenue is the Incense cedar (Calocedrus decurrens). This is an upright columnar evergreen tree that will meet the requirement of being an upright tree_ c. Calper inches on conifer trees are to be 3" measured 12"above top of rootball. If you have any questions regarding this, please feel free to call. Sincerely. I An y Nuttbroc 1020 5.W. TAYLOR SUITE 55 - PORTLAND. OREGON 97205 • 50.1/222-9881 • FAX 5031324-7069 L- _ITTLILBRATTrad IMPROVEMENTS PERFORMANCE BOND Bond No. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENCE, that we as Principal, and corporation duly authorized to conduct a general surety business in the State of Oregon, as Surety, are jointly and severally held bound unto the City of Tigard, Oregon, a municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called obligee, in the sum of $ lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which we, as Principal, and as Surety, severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by t hese pros jointly and these THE CONDITIONS OF THIS BOND AND OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that the Principals iare Conn ng grad-ing aid installing -er-esiea control mprovements on property (located at) (identified by an improvement plan known Tigard, Oregon, in accordance with a , located in the City of Tigard, Oregon, gig plan approved by the City of NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully and /truly observe and comply with all terms and conditions of the approved grading plan and shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be performed under all ordinances, regulations and conditions of the Obligee applicable to said development and improvement, and shall promptly make payments to all persons supplying labor or material for any of the work provided by said agreement, and shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or prosecuted against the Obligee, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms of this bond, in addition to all other rights and remedies, the City, in the event it shall prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as and for attorney' s fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this day of 199 Principal By: By: (A true copy of the Power of Attorney must be attached to the original of Surety bond) . y Attorney in Fact Address Hi\El7CDOC\HASTEAS\coca,..mi, balk CliVt 7 6 /41/4445,7 Cis 4st r1 FEES : View Add Change Delete Payment List Group Esc View fee detail OaSITE WORK PERMITaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaG o :SIT97-0010 : PROJECT:LANDMARK PARKING LOT: STATUS : I : UPD: 10/14/97 : :DST: ° o PERMITTEE:JIM CORLISS & CORA CORLISS PRIM. . :SDR97-0008 : ° o SITE ADDRESS : 06840 SW DARTMOUTH ST JUR. . . :TIG: ° uaOaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ac o o FEES 0 0 o o * Case No. -- Fee Type Fee-Amount Amount--Pd Date--Pd 0 0 o ° SIT97-0010 [BUPPLN] Pln Ck-Valu $ 0 . 00 $ 258 . 05 10/01/97 0 0 ud° SIT97-0010 [BUILD] Prmt Fee-Valu $ 397 . 00 $ 397 . 00 10/14/97 °ac o o SIT97-0010 [BUPPLN] Pln Ck-Valu $ 258 . 05 $ 258 . 05 10/14/97 0 0 o ° SIT97-0010 [TAX] 5% St Tax-Valu $ 19 . 85 $ 19 . 85 10/14/97 0 0 o o SIT97-0010 [BUILD] Prmt Fee-CuYd $ 96 . 00 $ 96 . 00 10/14/97 0 0 o ° SIT97-0010 [BUPPLN] Pln Ck-CuYd $ 22 . 50 $ 22 . 50 10/14/97 0 0 o ° SIT97-0010 [TAX] 5% St Tax-CuYd $ 4 . 28 $ 4 . 28 10/14/97 0 0 o ° SIT97-0010 [ERPRMT] Erosion Cntl $ 100 . 00 $ 100 . 00 10/14/97 0 0 O o SIT97-0010 [ERPLN] Ersn Plck-USA $ 32 . 50 $ 32 . 50 10/14/97 0 0 ado SIT97-0010 [EROSN] Ersn Plck-COT $ 32 . 50 $ 32 . 50 10/14/97 °ac o ° SIT97-0010 [WQUQNT] Wtr Quant % $ 1690 . 70 $ 1690 . 70 10/14/97 0 0 o aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa $ 2653 . 38-$ 2653 . 38=$ 0 . 00 BAL di ° O 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaai RETRUN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: S ? OF OREGON CITY HALL RECORDS DEPART r, SS OGTIGARD L .y of Washington 131'_5 SW F.ail Blvd. Tigard.OR 97223 I, Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assess- ment t and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for said county, do hereby certify that INDIVIDU:�I, the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records of said county. File Nu. Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessment and Taxation, Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 97101529 Rect: 196956 23. 00 DEDICATION DEED 10/29/1997 10: 02: 32am FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES —� I 1v1 ri^'`> I, .t ,]- ( di< LISc does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road, and utility purposes on,over,across,under, along, and within the following described real propety in Washington County, Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is S 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this : day of . /af-- , 19 q:72- Gtit ("/ �- L G l/1- 4r/71 E( (-- 7:1(G Signatu e Signature AC:. L)357C Tax Statement Mailing Address Mailing Address r c4/sre- f k a 7 ,2-e/ STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 10-I-61 (date)by: .St rrt 4 Qor°- Cog- 1 t ss (name of person(s)). 2_1‘a• Notary's Signature My �-i ada� OFFICIAL SEAL y Commission Expires: •r.*;► . ALINE K BASH - `r NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 2 :s"../ COMMISSION N0.A052730 `•V COMMISSION EXPIRES APR 01, 2000 1 Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 7 rcl day of, 44)6-4-✓ 19 7 . - � City Engineer 1 - I:1ENG1Pl1&FORIMROwDE•IM.bOT 3 surveyors engineer1- . planners �Yclib ;;- A (1 w :: W.B. Wells and associates inc. SEPTEMBER 25 1997 4230 N.E.Fremont St Portland,OR 97213 Phone(503)284-5896 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FAX(503)284-8530 (RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION) W.B. WELLS & ASSOCIATES , INC. - JOB 94 -070 A TRACT CF LAND OF VARIABLE WIDTH,BEING PART OF THE EAST 5.00 FEET OF LOTS 8,34,35 AND 36 BLOCK 19 IN THE PLAT OF "WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS",AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED MAY 30TH 1997 AS FEE NO. 97050083 AND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH,RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN , CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON; SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 34: SAID POINT BEING 30.00 FEET WEST OF WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTERLINE CF S.W. 68TH AVE. (GRANT ST.) AS DEDICATED PER SAID PLAT ; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, SOUTH 89 55' 56" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 35.00 FEET DISTANT WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID CENTERLINE OF S.W. 68TH NORTH 00 00'18" EAST A DISTANCE OF 91.74 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A ROADWAY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 1ST., 1980 AS FEE NO. 80011312; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 04 34' 09"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 62.70 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 68TH AVE. (GRANT ST.) AS DEDICATED PER PLAT, SAID POINT BEING 30.00 FEET DISTANT WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT-ANGLES TO THE STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY DIVISION ENGINEERS CENTERLINE STATION "H" 67+00 AS CALLED FOR IN SAID DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 80011312; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOTS 35 AND 36, SOUTH 00 00' 18"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29.23 FEET TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING". CONTAINING 189 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. NOTE: BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE BASED ON DATA PER BOUNDARY SURVEYS SN-25,516 , 25,830 AND 25,916. Exceptional Service. Creative Solutions, � r Quality Beyond Your Expectations.xpectations. 3 inimmommin fr 1 50.00' /1 Sii • I STA 64+50 n\YCP. 1 I 1 S��\O� 1 9N111 t° 1 5 - - i S.W. DARTMOUTH ST. o VACATED 60' WIDE - _ - - - c F� ^l �W l 2k 99.94' I00.00'PLAT 1 u a 1 Im 1 o • COQ W � CC)--. �I I o � o I I Ili .= o m g c„.1 0 0 7-..., I \:%\\\\ 6 7 8 N CIP 0' SCALE: I' = 30' 35.00' 4 10.5 IN BLOCK 19 �.J°' ; 10 'NEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS Ft� I': 1 - IA 36 Ig I ,,, o 1 N- I a,0I N I 35 8 %1 o y g . 3o.DO 90 AREA TO BE DEDICATED �j K, 189 SQUARE FEET rc`! 8 34 • 0 ai o• CD S 89•55'56* W • 35.00' I 5.00' y 30.00' POINT OF BEGINNING 1 S.E. CORNER LOT 34 FEE NO. 97050083 N; ti N r -' d I l . I N N S . W. E LiffiTIRST ST . ,>' 3 3 60' WIDE PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION DESIGNED: LB. ELLS Aim EXHIBIT "A " RESOLVED:TAD ASSOCIATES, INC. DRAVN: DIN SURVEYORS/ENGINEERS/PLANNERS FOR LANDMARK FORD DATE: 9/29/97 4230 OREGON 597213 LOTS 5-8 k 34-36, BLOCK 19, NEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS SCALE: I' • 30' FAX (503) 284-5530 SITUATED IN THE NE 1 4 OF FILE NO. 94-070 Fax (503) 284-8530 / F SECTION 1, T 2 S, R I lI, )I.M. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON `REVISED: /. /7'L4 Cpl a,e1 74tC� -40 . a . .� CITY Or TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION Di v ISION 0.,-.,, �24-Hour Inspection Line: 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 .Date Requested: I 7 `01.-).-q S A.M. P.M. MST: Location: 6 D p atO • BUP: Tenant: 4'ti1-a- & Suite: Bldg: MEC: Contractor: _di.. , , //A /1'4;L., Phone: D �)[ - r -, PLM: _Owner: _ +, 1 ,,Phone: n ELC: 4I . +Ate IL I� L-'I-- N(J SOP ( i . ELR: it 411 •� �' 1-)(r P ? ti, fT .[ ,e ,` t ' ( C. SIT: SDI'- 7-C 'Q' BUILDING BLDG(con't) PLUMBING MR,' CAL E CTRICAL SITE Site Post/Beam Post/Beam Post/Beam Cover/Service Sewer/Storm Footing Roof UndFl/Slab Rough-In Ceiling Water Line Slab Framing Top Out Gas Line Rough-In UG Sprinkler Foundation Insulation Sewer Hood/Duct Reconnect Vault Bsmt Damp Drywall Storm Furnace Temp Service MISC. Masonry Ceiling Rain Drain A/C UG Slab 9 r, jc �, Shear/Sheath Fire Spk1r/Alm Crawl/Found Dr Heat Pump Low Volt IJ �L Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Appr/Sdwlk Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL O Call for reinspection O Reinspection fee of$ required before next inspection ❑Unable to inspect Inspector. Date: Page of \ • % cC J ...I (N ) '1)1 %ICI I • • t • `. --• • t k /4, 1"::1 9 CONDITIONS: View Add Mult-case Ins-before Change Delete Renumber Print Esc View text of highlighted condition OaSITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa o ': SDR97-0008 : PROJECT:LANDMARK PARKING LOT: STATUS:P : UPD: 09/04/97 : :JPH: ° o APPLICANT: LANDMARK FORD PRIM. . : SDR97-0008 : ° o SITE ADDRESS: 06840 SW DARTMOUTH ST JUR. . . :TIG: ° uaOaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacac o 0 CONDITIONS 0 0 o o #--- Code Title Stat Date---- By- ° 0 o ° 1) 0001 ADDITIONAL ROW DEDICATED DONE 10/02/97 BDR o 0 o o 2) 0001 REVISED SITE/LNDSCP PLANS INCLUDE OK 10/20/97 JPH 0 0 ua° 3) 0001 OPACITY DESIGN STANDARD REQRMENTS DONE 10/02/97 JPH °ac o ° 4) 0001 STREET TREES LOCATION REQRMENTS: OK 10/02/97 JPH 0 0 o ° 5) 0001 LNDSCP ARCHITECT TREE REQRMENTS: DONE 10/02/97 JPH 0 0 o ° 6) 0001 BICYCLE PARKING SPACE REQURMENTS: OK 10/07/97 JPH 0 0 o ° 7) 0001 SITE IMP TO BE PER RVSD PLANS / / JPH 0 0 tad° °ac O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 uaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiac O 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaai CONDITIONS: View Add Mult-case Ins-before Change Delete Renumber Print Esc View text of highlighted condition OaSITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa� o : SDR97-0008 : PROJECT:LANDMARK PARKING LOT: STATUS:P : UPD: 09/04/97 : :JPH: ° o APPLICANT:LANDMARK FORD PRIM. . : SDR97-0008 : ° o SITE ADDRESS: 06840 SW DARTMOUTH ST JUR. . . :TIG: ° uaOaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaGac o o CONDITIONS o 0 o o #--- Code Title Stat Date---- By- ° ° o ° 1) 0001 ADDITIONAL ROW DEDICATED DONE 10/02/97 BDR ° ° o o 2) 0001 REVISED SITE/LNDSCP PLANS INCLUDE OK 10/20/97 JPH o 0 ua° 3) 0001 OPACITY DESIGN STANDARD REQRMENTS DONE 10/02/97 JPH °ac o ° 4) 0001 STREET TREES LOCATION REQRMENTS: OK 10/02/97 JPH ° ° o ° 5) 0001 LNDSCP ARCHITECT TREE REQRMENTS: DONE 10/02/97 JPH ° 0 o ° 6) 0001 BICYCLE PARKING SPACE REQURMENTS: OK 10/07/97 JPH o 0 o o 7) 0001 SITE IMP TO BE PER RVSD PLANS / / JPH o 0 ado °ac o o 0 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 0 uaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiac O 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaai Page No. 1 CONDITIONS/CORRECTIONS FOR CASE NO.: SDR97-0008 LANDMARK FORD 06840 SW DARTMOUTH ST 01/21/98 1) ADDITIONAL ROW DEDICATED -- Prior to issuance of the site permit, additional right-of-way (ROW) shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of 68th to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2) REVISED SITE/LNDSCP PLANS INCLUDE -- Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following:;;A) L-1 landscaping will be installed along the northern property line (along SW Dartmouth Street).;B) the proposed L-1 landscaping trees are in addition to required street trees; and;C) the proposed L-1 landscaping landscaping trees will be 3 1/2 inch caliper.; 3) OPACITY DESIGN STANDARD REQRMENTS -- Provide a letter from a landscape architect that indicates the proposed vegetation meets the 90% opacity design standard and that the proposed ground cover will fully cover the remaining landscape area within two (2) years or revise the plans accordingly. 4) STREET TREES LOCATION REQRMENTS: -- Submit a revised plan that shows the street trees are located within the right-of-way, no moe than 27 feet apart on SW Dartmouth Street and no more than 22 feet apart on Sw 68th Avenue. 5) LNDSCP ARCHITECT TREE REQRMENTS: -- Submit a letter from a landscape architect that verifies the trees along SW Dartmouth Street are broad spreading and the trees along SW 68th Avenue are columnar. The trees indicated on the plan do not meet the above standards, the plan must be revised to provide for trees that meet the standards. 6) BICYCLE PARKING SPACE REQURMENTS: -- Submit a revised plan that shows the location of one (1) bicycle parkign space. This may be located with other bicycle spaces, however, must be in addition to spaces currently required. 7) SITE IMP TO BE PER RVSD PLANS -- All site improvements shall be installed as aapproved, per the revised site plan. CRY OF TIGARD BUILDING INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: F,v j C2vfr( D1 Oec-4., ,,g1-aC noel/cal Footing Susp. Ceiling Sprink. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Foundation Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Fireplace Post/Beam Struct. Plbg. Top Out Elec. Rough-in FINAL: Post/Beam Mech. San. Sewer Gas Line -Bldg. Plbg. Underfloor Rain Drain Framing -Plumb. Alarm Water Line Insulation -Mech. Underflr. Insul. Shear Wall Gyp. Bd. -Elect. Date Requested: —712 ``'/ ej Time:/0 -,4t141 PM Address: h 5'S 1116 ! 1 6a�? ��.f cv4�Lr Builder. 0 0\t, C >e•t-4r61, 40-^ Permit#: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: A Inspector: , { �,(� O e Date: 7 e. _APPROVED JDISAPPROVED _APPROVED SUBJE 2 y TO ABOVE _Call For Reinsp.