The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1997-00015 SDR97 - 00015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)91-0015 CITY a T;oARO TARGET STORE EXPANSION Community Development SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: TARGET STORE EXPANSION Site Development Review SDR 97-0015 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to expand an existing Target store by 19,861 square feet for a total of 124,769 square feet. APPLICANT: SLS Associates, Inc. OWNER: Dayton Hudson Corporation 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 33 South Sixth Street Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Minneapolis, MN 55440 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1 . Submit a revised site and landscaping plan for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. Impervious surface/landscaping calculations which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will be, or is provided; and B. Written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION: 2. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site received Site Development Approval under Washington County file # 86-544DN/LLA. The site was further reviewed by the City under SDR 87-17 to modify the approved plan to delete a pedestrian walkway required under the original approval. No other development applications, related to the Target store itself, were found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located at 9009 SW Hall Boulevard. The site is also identified as WCTM 1S126 C, tax lot 01200. The site is bordered to the east, west and south by property inside the Tigard city limits, zoned C-G. The property to the north, across Hall Boulevard is outside the Tigard city limits in Washington County. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a 104,908 square foot Target store and parking lot with 506 parking spaces. The proposal is to modify the existing site by adding 19,861 more square feet onto the existing building and removing 63 parking spaces. The applicant submitted the initial application and plans on 12-1-97 and additional required information and revised plans on 12-11-97. The revised plans showed an additional 545 square foot area of expansion near the front of the store. Staff relied on the original plans to evaluate compliance with landscaping, grading, etc. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 2 SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1 . These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The proposed expansion is abutting commercial zoned property on all sides, therefore screening between different types of land uses is not applicable. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The area adjacent to the expansion abuts a drive into the Washington Square Mall. This area is at a higher grade than the street and is fully landscaped, thus effectively screening the parking lot from view. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As stated above, the parking area is screened by existing landscaping. The landscaping proposal shows landscaped parking islands that meet the above requirements of 1 tree for each 7 parking spaces. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). NOTICE OF DECISION SCR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 3 The site has frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. There are existing trees along Hall which meet the standards of the development code. No additional street trees are required, therefore, this criterion has been met. Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has not provided calculations regarding the amount of impervious surface and landscaping. FINDING: Because calculations were not provided which indicate 15% of the site is or will be landscaped, staff can not determine if all landscaping and screening standards have been met. CONDITION: Submit impervious surface/landscaping calculations which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will continue to be provided. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The existing site meets vision clearance standards at the entrance into the site. The proposed expansion will not be located within any vision clearance areas and required site improvements will not encroach into the vision clearance areas. FINDING: Because the vision clearance areas will not be altered and currently meets the standards, this criterion has been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(C)(1) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor space for General Retail Sales. The total square footage of the existing and proposed building is 124,769 square feet. The total parking required is 312 parking spaces. The site plan indicates there will be 443 parking spaces after the expansion is complete. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. There is an existing bicycle rack shown on the plan that meets the requirements. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 4 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The total square footage for all existing and proposed structures exceeds 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standards apply. The plans indicate the construction of a loading dock will be included in the expansion. FINDING: Because the plan provides for the required vehicle parking spaces, bicycle parking spaces, and off-street loading, the criterion for off-street parking and loading have been met. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 100+ parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 50 feet and a minimum pavement width of 40 feet or 2 accesses with a width of 30-foot and a pavement width of 24 feet. There is one (1), right-in/right-out access in the middle of the lot and a shared 75-foot access at the eastern property line. FINDING: Because the existing site meets the access requirements, this standard has been met. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. Any new signs proposed must conform to the provisions listed in this code section. Any new signs proposed will be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application if necessary, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Eight (8) parking lot trees will be removed to accommodate the expansion. These trees will be re-planted in the new landscaping area. None of the trees to be removed are greater than 12-inch caliper. FINDING: Because there will be no net loss of trees greater than 12-inch caliper as a result of this proposal, this criterion has been met. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE E XPANSION PAGE 5 Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site is located adjacent to Hall Boulevard, which is a fully improved arterial street in this area and is under ODOT jurisdiction. The nature of the addition is for expansion of walking aisles within the store and a better layout of merchandise. The applicant will actually reduce the number of parking spaces on the site, but will still have adequate parking to meet City standards. Staff does not anticipate that this addition will generate a significant amount of "new" traffic, and finds that there are no additional transportation improvements warranted. Water: This site is served from the Tualatin Valley Water District's public water lines. The new addition will be served from existing on-site water lines. No additional public water line work is proposed. Sanitary Sewer: There are existing on-site sewer service lines that will adequately serve this new addition. No new public sanitary sewer line work is proposed. Storm Drainage: This addition will not result in an increase in hard surface area because the majority of the area is existing parking. For any landscaping areas that will be disrupted, the applicant is proposing to relocate those areas. Therefore, there will not be an increase in surface water runoff. The existing on-site storm drainage system will be modified to accommodate the drainage from the addition and reconfigured parking areas. Storm Water Quality: Since there will not be an increase in hard surface area on this site, this section will not apply. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The erosion control plan must be submitted with the building plans as part of the building permit phase. FINDING: Because the existing site has water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage service and because Engineering Staff has determined that no additional storm water quality, grading and erosion control or street improvements are necessary, staff finds the Street and Utility Improvement Standards have been met. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 6 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this section: 18.120.180.11(Access and Circulation), 18.120.180.13(Parking), 18.120.180.14(Landscaping), 18.120.180.15(Drainage), 18.120.180.17(Signs). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The proposal includes the location (or re-location) of a trash compactor. The applicant must provide evidence from a waste hauler that this method is acceptable to meet the standards of section 18.116 as described above. A trash compactor permit is required and can be obtained at Tigard City Hall. Please contact a Development Services Technician at (503) 639-4171 x304 for additional information. FINDING: Because a waste hauler has not indicated that the trash compactor meets the current standards, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the existing location, this criterion will be met. CONDITION: Submit a written sign-off from the hauler that states the proposed trash enclosure meets their current standards for mixed solid waste and recyclables storage. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. This section is not applicable as the proposal involves expanding onto existing developed land (the parking lot) which is fully graded and paved. FINDING: Because the site is fully developed, staff finds this criterion does not apply. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and has offered no comments or objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 7 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 8 disabled parking spaces if 301-400 parking spaces are provided and 9 disabled parking spaces if 401-500 parking spaces are provided. While an expansion requires additional handicap parking spaces, the site currently has 10 handicap parking spaces which currently exceeds the handicap parking requirements by one (1) space. With the removal of additional parking spaces, the required number of handicap parking spaces will be exceeded by two (2) parking spaces. FINDING: Because the required number of disabled parking spaces will be provided, this criterion has been met. Provisions and regulations of the underlying zone Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to expand an existing retail store. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as General Retail Sales. Code Section 18.62.030 lists General Retail Sales as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet for parcels in the C-G zoning district. The site is on an existing lot, therefore the dimensional requirements for the lot do not apply to this decision. Setbacks: Section 18.62.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district. Except as otherwise provided in section 18.98, no building in the C-G zoning district shall exceed 45 feet in height. Setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The Building Code has some standards regulating the setback of a building this size to the property line, however it appears the existing and proposed setback is sufficient to meet this standard. The proposed height of the expansion is the same as the existing structure which is approximately 22 feet. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and indicated that in order to provide required fire flow, an additional fire hydrant may be needed. They have also indicated that the applicant will need to recalculate fire protection systems for additional capacity and that a fire hydrant is needed at the southwest corner. These requirements are mentioned in order to assist the applicant in submittal of the building NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 8 plans. The requirements will not be required as part of this approval, but will be required as part of the building permit review. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and have no objections. They have, however, stated that a backflow prevention device will be required behind the water meter. They are also unclear as to whether the proposal involves utilizing the existing meter or a separate water meter. The applicant should contact the water department to address this question. Compliance with backflow prevention will be required during the building permit process. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency and PGE have reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. Tualatin Valley Water Department (TVWD), City of Beaverton, ODOT, NW Natural gas and Tri-met were notified of the proposal and did not respond with comments or objections. SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY FEBRUARY 2, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 9 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 2, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . January 22, 1998 PREP ED BY: Julia Hajduk DATE Associate Planner �`7 c'-‘ c_4 t&L, ; January 22, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd'orff DATE Planning Manager i:\curpin.Julia\sdr\Target.doc NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 10 _ V - — - — - — - -- - -- - - 8 7 31 d 11 d d • I V — — - — . -- — — 1iii■ii/ nii i::iiu :iii iniie i 3 O•...1) 4...4 ,..p Wn.P ••• won -3- vivo pAil 1pR10 M �- l �I i"''f I IYI m11111.1.1.1—l-1fiT. .i'1.I:�T►.i.�1.L1Tl.l.i.l.l.l.la .l.l.i:�.l I g ma_ !� j r 41 11111 f- cLIJ=I . .:..0 _11. _�IIItNIIII�� IIIII i 1 • CCI Inil lli - • IF- 1•4...;t:,-:&T -k*i....*-- -;.■:.N.t..4__NMI MU—' \1 � ' D,I .- , ,. t4., „kft . 1 - . - i 1 = 4. f G Y - EJ:WI1HHUIlfIIIHHIL7, , , , ., ii," 011:1 I1HIHI HI l � � = 4 ,I, .,1 i. .,.- 4), ,..„,, ,i _, „ , _....!,i , VA LV69Z ,1p,�_ 3( J d6 6a101 � Hie illil `, lBJddl4 � , -b/ i -• .,,i ,,,, _ ,..... . ,., ,„, , IbHfflHH, 1 ,„, __ , . O,. ows .1010 Y 'de oMO�ne . ---_.. --I ,\c; CD < E 1 I ' ,_.........m____ -- --'• 6��' / /ii"-, --4,/ z a O 41:7_1' r� / ov x) NO 11,1411 .1. % B „.,i / ri 1 • 7 M o ii>- y z CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION A i-v _ t • CITY of TIGARD - i I OE001111►HIC INFORMATION.TiTEY II� lirVICINITY MAP 1 SDR 97 0015 4 Target Store Expansion 1 2 i w . ' I ■I., mg 1 sp ., &14 4 I it, -*'-v 1m 111 i tz, It 111 711" E----'.--> '\ * A4k 1SU : J . T , . ii [FL] __ _ k _, .4,,,„ i__ Ili, 1 in -r , 4 • r 111.„ ly I— I ______ j 41 0 100 !00 Foot I W I 1 1'=S55 bN k -, -ll LEHMANN n city of Tigard, 1 Information on I1 Y TII.P is 104 general location only and should be waved with the o v,. Service.t>"rbl. 13125 SWHdB.d OR 97223 «us I__ _1l1 . 1_�__Li> rnmmunity Develnnment Plot date: Dec 11. 1997: c:\maaic\maaicdd,•aar . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: January 20, 1998 TO: Julia Hajduk, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 97-0015, Target Store Expansion Description: This project is for a 19,316 square foot expansion of the existing Target store located at 9009 SW Hall Boulevard (WCTM 1S1 26CD, Tax Lot 1200). Findings: 1. Streets: This site is located adjacent to Hall Boulevard, which is a fully improved arterial street in this area and is under ODOT jurisdiction. The nature of the addition is for expansion of walking aisles within the store and a better layout of merchandise. The applicant will actually reduce the number of parking spaces on the site, but will still have adequate parking to meet City standards. Staff does not anticipate that this addition will generate a significant amount of "new" traffic, and finds that there are no additional transportation improvements warranted. 2. Water: This site is served from the Tualatin Valley Water District's public water lines. The new addition will be served from existing on-site water lines. No additional public water line work is proposed. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There are existing on-site sewer service lines that will adequately serve this new addition. No new public sanitary sewer line work is proposed. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0015 Target Store Expansion PAGE 1 4. Storm Drainage: This addition will not result in an increase in hard surface area because the majority of the area is existing parking. For any landscaping areas that will be disrupted, the applicant is proposing to relocate those areas. Therefore, there will not be an increase in surface water runoff. The existing on-site storm drainage system will be modified to accommodate the drainage from the addition and reconfigured parking areas. 5. Storm Water Quality: Since there will not be an increase in hard surface area on this site, this section will not apply. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Recommendation: The Engineering Department recommends approval. i.\eng\brianr\comments\sdr95-15.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0015 Target Store Expansion PAGE 2 • • ! • • • Z. 9009 SW Hall Blvd. 6 SP ' 87-1, WASHINGTON COUNTY FILE NUMBER :6- +/V/LLA Target Stores Washington Square Circle 1S1 26C lots 1100, 1101 , & 1200 157 , 330 sq. ft. retail outlet MLP 87-10 Washington Sq. Plaza 1S1 26C lot 1100 divide 4.9 acres into 2.6 & 2.3 acres M 88-19 Lamonts/Washington Sq. Cc. 1S1 26C 1100 & 1111 lot line adjust_aQiit REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI OFTIi&ARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 11,1991 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:15031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)97-0015 ➢ TARGET STORE EXPANSION The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,316 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - DECEMBER 29,1991). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: X We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: :c {! DEC 1 8 1997 , (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: �� I Phone Number(s): - a I SDR 97.0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS k _ — - -- - -- - -- - .-- - — e 1 d d V d d 'M 1) - -- ._ - — liii.iit .•si )ei■ri .iiii -- iiii i; ,..Mn.) M•O V111 Wp.11 •S'$ •nn viv l 1•.4111 / o,n ) . ..�' — 1:1.. .� '�1, 111tiiii-iiiiiiiinfil lIiil�iitrrl'riiriitili1 '� i -- �' k... i_ -� `` �• _11 I I H 11 1"1111 I ,r. -, .f...0. VS "I i I i _--,,,,,.aril-� �a \\��, �� 1)11111111111 I I I I 1 11111 Ffi i .. pp - NeminM 2 II I I 0.• •\; _ t t1iM• NOEINVein 011.11111111111:1111111111r ,i■ V //, ' i: Iill1I1 � . ) 2c 4 4d L1,1393 i „° F. 1 �.�ot9wt `� -7 lJJ �ldlO �` - �\� dot. CA I�? _ J 1 F11 �1L►.' ' mo '►1 de 1 o�. n �d ONaI'19 • �' 1I - i i' .-° / 3 O , o ae iliii,el O - cpa 1, — '1�i17- '' 1 Iii L .1 o C ,,,1 , , I,CtAS --•-r l 111 V o CO) m I 1 r==-t ,,,... .OI.«urea.. r' + / 1 1, y -4 v z CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION .A, iiiii l' VICINITY MAP 1 - SIM 97-0015 U —1 I Target Store Expansion MO a g i j .,,, . a t ! g •■ 1 I Isiah; . i \, ,, „I, ______. PA (1-/* in-i \I ii kit ■ _J II. i • L N r - i I 0 100 400 Feel L , 1'=555 feel . n G;I BORDE• A It t. ii ' 0� - - - — r _,- ---— C a r d Infomistion on M •v «.i loader s Dray ud should n.w*lsd wa1FW124 n«BNd 7 d$s*..Division. 1/wwwd4paraw, . --I 1_-[._ .I L I I --Community Development Plot date: Dec 11. 1997: c:\maaic\maaicdd.aor 4' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CRY o'T,aAQQ Community Development S1 aping A Better Community BATE hs.m r vow/ TO: Jde wait I/SWM Program FROM: City M TIgu 1 Ph.sih flvleien STAFF CONTACT: Jana!swell 1.100 Associate Planner P I:(503)6314171 Fee 1503)684-7797 RE SITE IEVELOPMEIT REVIEW=SARI O1-015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION Q The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,316 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it Is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18-100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Piet ammo, Msi and ApiNcasts Ste(.eNpt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (NINNY - OE$111111129.OW You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments- �>!e.ere eaedle 4 011 1 tee edtiYe eeLe, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments In writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: rrE LITITT27 (Pleair pmwieli tfie foavainp vtfammtu , N.!■.of P.rtii.8[fW C.Ateitn0 _ 1 Pr...NomOonsk -<z5 a t iOR 97-0016 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COhMIEFfTS 4* REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIIGARD Community Deve(npment Shaping. Better Community DATE: December 11,1991 TO: Brian Moore,PGE FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:(50316847297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(508)91-0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION < The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,316 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - DECEMBER 29,1997). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: \/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. — Written comments provided below: — 44 (Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Permits)Commenting: ' l✓,,,j 1.1.X,? I Phone Number(s): `. --70-4Acco I SDR 97-0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS .441 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIiGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: December 11,199/ TO: Michael Miller,Operations Water Department Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone:150316394171 Fax:[50316847297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(5DR)91-0015 ➢ TARGET STORE EKPANSION < The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,316 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MONDAY - DECEMBER 29,1991). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Lt / jif)F ektIL SF(LV/GE /4l2E1 -. P '5C (20AJT4GT 1,u12 (7 642• ts-// v '► (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: j /ieg !Phone Number(s): x Sqs I SDR 97-0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENT O I CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 11,1991 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)91-0015 ➢ TARGET STORE EXPANSION < The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,316 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MONDAY - DECEMBER 29,1991). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V ►► (Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: j \_ I Phone Number(sl: V i°I• kilVq 1. 1l4 I SDR 97-0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSALIREQUEST FOR COMMENTS _ ` _ — —--. — -- — -- — — a 7 I a Y s!d 'M to — — - — -- - -- liii.ii 4 r ci jeiin .iici Otii t i- •on wna• r••w rrn _ iIW 1194113 �. Vii:_ ..�� ■ J1 )(- _ wig IJ10[CO 11 r � -_^ -_"�(r1 , , ' .• i _�1 iii I ITI I I I I LLLLLL1.1.rI I n I 1 1T ... '.. .1. ..1xT.<*:._.a .� _ -a I I I I I� I I I I�� V I I I f� i fi ::� __ Da IT'—� ± . .111111 RI 0.11-11-1-1 1 .• m = I ': me f_ 1 0=�-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I1 I I I I I I I I I I Ia.� ; s I, .1 i _ oH1IIlrl1L1 ;N.��r ,.. = 4 ,, , � "I :� � lAJddlCI � � r.I}HIfI /.;P, AD I. 0 - 1 . +-4/ fli CA / o c Il We o "d- -2r p .• 0 03 — .•. NCIB(/dK1 oN .. _ ..c.'"; u a --, o l , fr ' ; ' T _ ir 2 .:71— o k1 9 1 A a i L E I"Itl l IX rn 1 I 1 o y Ile _.W> , a c41 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION I 111111111r CITY of TIGARD I! OFOOPAPHIC INFOPYATION 9V9TF4 rg VICINITY MAP imumir SDR 97-0015 i :_,., c:::: v6..„ .7. ig t % IP* . 4 tli , Target Store Expansion IP s 1 al''t a S0 ° 81 \il ZPA~H � - ■ �� - IIN \ I lit, att., i 1 il 1. --- IIII . 11" ik9 1 I - _ W I 0 100 600 Feat L 1'=655 feet 1 BORDER z A/. Ili City of Tigard S I _ — Infonna lon on 6+.n- Y for genial loatbn ony and should be verified with the Development Smokes OMslon 13125 SW HM Blvd Tipsld.OR 07223 Al _ _ _ ___ ___[__�_ it 1 I_t- (50)630-1,7, Community Development Plot date: Dec 11. 1997: c:lmaaiclmaaicdd.aor REQUEST FOR COMMENTS c� CITY OF Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: December 11,199/ TO: David Scott,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone:15031639-41171 Fax:15031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)91-0015 ➢ TARGET STORE EXPANSION < The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,316 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MONDAY - DECEMBER 29,1991). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: See_ rc 7/1771- 11 f) lac )' 4 p 1reinpr e S d w?, i, i/ r141 J`o►rlrJ r 1 A )) 6IA) ) ,. l fv f/.-e 2-,-. 1.4 1) r 71'0(.0 ffet, ✓) fl d.- 14'4r / de .t )l nf 6 ) 17 / )2 1 di ir et �, 1 r, tmh o Guy ?¢v /7ro,f— - y L)r' c l7 7/n .r ,? fet ►71 esl ^rDiTe/ 7 ' z _1. (p/vv/G(t K/4 �•^tl� / 'I✓'p ��tJ� ,fees /ec,t lode APc j'v lie-7�i.1•, Syf Ir,�47 hie A>> k cfed l'. H. For "'o►pi city mfr, (Please provide the farrowing information)Name of Persons)Commenting: r`f Pe- n I Firze h7�- I Phone Number(s): U "14 # rd r r e y SDR 97-0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS c.CITY TIICiARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 1/,1991 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SORI 91-0015 ➢ TARGET STORE EXPANSION < The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,316 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - DECEMBER 29,1991). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 (Please provide the following information)Name of Persons]Commenting: I Phone Numbertsl: I SDR 97-0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CRAM:(CI [El [sI LWl . . ;.; .. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENTTEAMS ®Place tor r uUbraryCflIs,ltal FILE NMI: 3 U P. 1 -CC/5 FILE NAME[SM: %��1Z �f//e o>2 CITY OFFICES _ _ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,pi�,.,�s,,, �.o. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./ov .sue..Technic;... K ,,, POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,cr, .Prevention Once, _BUILDING DIV./David Scott,Budding°niciat ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Wty.,nt.R«iwEnpnw [WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,°,...,,,..Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder _OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,P..,..,,M...g. _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street (place In pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 -LOCAL AND STATEJURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON . _CITY OF TUALATIN _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS PO Box 4755 Planning Director 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street, NE Beaverton,OR 97076 PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 _Larry Conrad,soli.Planner OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. —Mike Matteucci, ve.gremd.Coati. METRO _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 _CITY OF DURHAM Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 City Manager _ wt US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. PO Box 23483 _Paulette Allen,Groh Management COOralnator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Mel Huie,Greonepacee Coordinator(cPA'yzoA.) 1175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946 Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946 _CITY OF KING CITY _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION City Manager 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY 15300 SW 116th Avenue Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. King City,OR 97224 Portland,OR 97232-2109 Attn: Tom Highland,pi nng 155 N.First Avenue 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350, MS 13 _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 Planning Director Bonneville Power Administration PO Box 369 PO Box 3621 _ODOT,REGION 1 _Brent Curtis(CPAs) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Sonya Kazen,attn„t.Rev.coma. _Scott King tcPA#) Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Tice(1GAs) David Knowles, Pler ring Bureau D+r. OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Tom Harry(Current Pl.App.) Portland Building 106, Rm. 1002 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A _Phil Healy(cnrtant P,App,) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist Portland,OR 97204 PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _BURLINGTON NORTHERN/ SANTA FE RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _TCI CABLEVISION OF OR. Reed Fay, Division Superintendent Jason Hewitt Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Linda Peterson 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 9480 SW Boeckman Road 3500 SW Bond Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97201 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 —COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY _PORTLAND WESTERN RJR TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Craig Eyestone _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Steve Myhr, Region Manager Michael Kiser,Project Planner 14200 SW Bngadoon Court Scott Palmer Catellus Property Management 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97005 220 SW Second Avenue 999 Third Avenue,Suite 2120 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Seattle,WA 98104-4037 —GENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Koft,Engineenng _OREGON ELECTRIC R/R _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. R/R _US WEST COMMUNICATION MC: 0R030546 (8118(1NG70N NORTHERN/SANTA ifR/RPRFDASSORI Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Pete Nelson Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Reed Fay,Division Superintendent 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 421 SW Oak Street 1313 W. 11th Street Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97204 Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 - h.\patrybnasters`.Acnohce.mst 27-Oct-97 ,A.,. ;11t AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping)1 Better Community STA(I t, Off'OREGON. ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of 1igard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: „pp,x,.re 80,o)e.00,.., ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDI 6/7 ';/c tai tt _rfz,t e., x/ /i)/ ) AMENDED NOTICE Ode No/Name Reference) El City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: f 'i ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Puolc Heanng) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: I ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Fie No/Name Reference) (Cate of PuwK heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer 7 Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FOR: (Typ Bind of Notice) !Fie No Mame Reference) (Date of Pubic Heanng,d apps el A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE Of DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was,. .•ed to e- - ed person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit B", the . � of A iy,( 2 1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 6--) , ay o A,,, /dam A 1998,postage prepaid. , allow,,,,L Igli I I 70 11 I,W ' i ( 7-:?',/f e e.e'V WAWA ( ' / (Person that P.-pared Noti /, Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the .2 7 •ay of vit 19 /. L' OFFICIAL SEAL(S ) ! !! /tilL' / ,,,l MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07.t999 H I Y PUBLIC OF ORE r • e . My Commission Expire : EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF DECISION 441" SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW [SDR] 97-0015 -42 CITY OF TIGARD TARGET STORE EXPANSION Community'Development Shaping A Better Community SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: TARGET STORE EXPANSION Site Development Review SDR 97-0015 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to expand an existing Target store by 19,861 square feet for a total of 124,769 square feet. APPLICANT: SLS Associates, Inc. OWNER: Dayton Hudson Corporation 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 33 South Sixth Street Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Minneapolis, MN 55440 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106. 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1 . Submit a revised site and landscaping plan for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. Impervious surface/landscaping calculations which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will be, or is provided; and B. Written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL INSPECTION: 2. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site received Site Development Approval under Washington County file # 86-544DN/LLA. The site was further reviewed by the City under SDR 87-17 to modify the approved plan to delete a pedestrian walkway required under the original approval. No other development applications, related to the Target store itself, were found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located at 9009 SW Hall Boulevard. The site is also identified as WCTM 1S126 C, tax lot 01200. The site is bordered to the east, west and south by property inside the Tigard city limits, zoned C-G. The property to the north, across Hall Boulevard is outside the Tigard city limits in Washington County. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is currently developed with a 104,908 square foot Target store and parking lot with 506 parking spaces. The proposal is to modify the existing site by adding 19,861 more square feet onto the existing building and removing 63 parking spaces. The applicant submitted the initial application and plans on 12-1-97 and additional required information and revised plans on 12-11-97. The revised plans showed an additional 545 square foot area of expansion near the front of the store. Staff relied on the original plans to evaluate compliance with landscaping, grading, etc. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 2 SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA ANL, FINDINGS Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The proposed expansion is abutting commercial zoned property on all sides, therefore screening between different types of land uses is not applicable. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The area adjacent to the expansion abuts a drive into the Washington Square Mall. This area is at a higher grade than the street and is fully landscaped, thus effectively screening the parking lot from view. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As stated above, the parking area is screened by existing landscaping. The landscaping proposal shows landscaped parking islands that meet the above requirements of 1 tree for each 7 parking spaces. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 3 The site has frontage on vV Hall Boulevard. There are existing sees along Hall which meet the standards of the development code. No additional street trees are required, therefore, this criterion has been met. • Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has not provided calculations regarding the amount of impervious surface and landscaping. FINDING: Because calculations were not provided which indicate 15% of the site is or will be landscaped, staff can not determine if all landscaping and screening standards have been met. CONDITION: Submit impervious surface/landscaping calculations which demonstrate that a minimum of 15% landscaping will continue to be provided. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The existing site meets vision clearance standards at the entrance into the site. The proposed expansion will not be located within any vision clearance areas and required site improvements will not encroach into the vision clearance areas. FINDING: Because the vision clearance areas will not be altered and currently meets the standards, this criterion has been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(C)(1) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor space for General Retail Sales. The total square footage of the existing and proposed building is 124,769 square feet. The total parking required is 312 parking spaces. The site plan indicates there will be 443 parking spaces after the expansion is complete. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. There is an existing bicycle rack shown on the plan that meets the requirements. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 4 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires 1nat every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. ' The total square footage for all existing and proposed structures exceeds 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standards apply. The plans indicate the construction of a loading dock will be included in the expansion. FINDING: Because the plan provides for the required vehicle parking spaces, bicycle parking spaces, and off-street loading, the criterion for off-street parking and loading have been met. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 100+ parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 50 feet and a minimum pavement width of 40 feet or 2 accesses with a width of 30-foot and a pavement width of 24 feet. There is one (1), right-in/right-out access in the middle of the lot and a shared 75-foot access at the eastern property line. FINDING: Because the existing site meets the access requirements, this standard has been met. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. Any new signs proposed must conform to the provisions listed in this code section. Any new signs proposed will be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application if necessary, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Eight (8) parking lot trees will be removed to accommodate the expansion. These trees will be re-planted in the new landscaping area. None of the trees to be removed are greater than 12-inch caliper. FINDING: Because there will be no net loss of trees greater than 12-inch caliper as a result of this proposal, this criterion has been met. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 5 Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site is located adjacent to Hall Boulevard, which is a fully improved arterial street in this area and is under ODOT jurisdiction. The nature of the addition is for expansion of walking aisles within the store and a better layout of merchandise. The applicant will actually reduce the number of parking spaces on the site, but will still have adequate parking to meet City standards. Staff does not anticipate that this addition will generate a significant amount of "new" traffic, and finds that there are no additional transportation improvements warranted. Water: This site is served from the Tualatin Valley Water District's public water lines. The new addition will be served from existing on-site water lines. No additional public water line work is proposed. Sanitary Sewer: There are existing on-site sewer service lines that will adequately serve this new addition. No new public sanitary sewer line work is proposed. Storm Drainage: This addition will not result in an increase in hard surface area because the majority of the area is existing parking. For any landscaping areas that will be disrupted, the applicant is proposing to relocate those areas. Therefore, there will not be an increase in surface water runoff. The existing on-site storm drainage system will be modified to accommodate the drainage from the addition and reconfigured parking areas. Storm Water Quality: Since there will not be an increase in hard surface area on this site, this section will not apply. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The erosion control plan must be submitted with the building plans as part of the building permit phase. FINDING: Because the existing site has water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage service and because Engineering Staff has determined that no additional storm water quality, grading and erosion control or street improvements are necessary, staff finds the Street and Utility Improvement Standards have been met. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 6 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18. 0.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be • addressed in this section: 18.120.180.11(Access and Circulation), 18.120.180.13(Parking), 18.120.180.14(Landscaping), 18.120.180.15(Drainage), 18.120.180.17(Signs). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The proposal includes the location (or re-location) of a trash compactor. The applicant must provide evidence from a waste hauler that this method is acceptable to meet the standards of section 18.116 as described above. A trash compactor permit is required and can be obtained at Tigard City Hall. Please contact a Development Services Technician at (503) 639-4171 x304 for additional information. FINDING: Because a waste hauler has not indicated that the trash compactor meets the current standards, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the existing location, this criterion will be met. CONDITION: Submit a written sign-off from the hauler that states the proposed trash enclosure meets their current standards for mixed solid waste and recyclables storage. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. This section is not applicable as the proposal involves expanding onto existing developed land (the parking lot) which is fully graded and paved. FINDING: Because the site is fully developed, staff finds this criterion does not apply. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and has offered no comments or objections to the plan, thereby, satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 7 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.1 Uv.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 8 disabled parking spaces if 301-400 parking spaces are provided and 9 disabled parking spaces if 401-500 parking spaces are provided. While an expansion requires additional handicap parking spaces, the site currently has 10 handicap parking spaces which currently exceeds the handicap parking requirements by one (1) space. With the removal of additional parking spaces, the required number of handicap parking spaces will be exceeded by two (2) parking spaces. FINDING: Because the required number of disabled parking spaces will be provided, this criterion has been met. Provisions and regulations of the underlying zone Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to expand an existing retail store. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as General Retail Sales. Code Section 18.62.030 lists General Retail Sales as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet for parcels in the C-G zoning district. The site is on an existing lot, therefore the dimensional requirements for the lot do not apply to this decision. Setbacks: Section 18.62.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district. Except as otherwise provided in section 18.98, no building in the C-G zoning district shall exceed 45 feet in height. Setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The Building Code has some standards regulating the setback of a building this size to the property line, however it appears the existing and proposed setback is sufficient to meet this standard. The proposed height of the expansion is the same as the existing structure which is approximately 22 feet. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and indicated that in order to provide required fire flow, an additional fire hydrant may be needed. They have also indicated that the applicant will need to recalculate fire protection systems for additional capacity and that a fire hydrant is needed at the southwest corner. These requirements are mentioned in order to assist the applicant in submittal of the building NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 8 plans. The requirements will not be required as part of this avproval, but will be required as part of the building permit review. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and have offered no • comments or objections. The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and have no objections. They have, however, stated that a backflow prevention device will be required behind the water meter. They are also unclear as to whether the proposal involves utilizing the existing meter or a separate water meter. The applicant should contact the water department to address this question. Compliance with backflow prevention will be required during the building permit process. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency and PGE have reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. Tualatin Valley Water Department (TVWD), City of Beaverton, ODOT, NW Natural gas and Tri-met were notified of the proposal and did not respond with comments or objections. SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY FEBRUARY 2, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 9 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 2, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. January 22, 1998 PREP ED BY: Julia Hajduk DATE Associate Planner ' am"�!cl� '' �y January 22, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i:lcurpinU ulia\sdr\Target.doc NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0015-TARGET STORE EXPANSION PAGE 10 -.- - — - — - — - -- _ -- - - a 7 4 d V I d 'M 9 — — - — . -- - — ciii,ii i .-.ii iKiiii :iii;---ni,. ••• •i3 n••o VIM wM11,11 .p . wan VIVO 1`.411] //i,t s-_-----'- ''- /�4- . ' - 'L.]7'_•. �� 'mow•No7-- 1.110.0L210 M ` %// o / �` ' • ,, . �.. • .. .LIl.LL1.l.LI.LLI.Ll.la1(I I lTl I.I�.IaTl.t.l.l.l.l.la .l.i .I.I y [ i 11 T�f 1.1 i.i.ly.1.1 I. j _ - CGI!�lC�_ 1 r }Qn�t �j11 r _/i• ' -�i — ' .-\\�,. ,�\� :„:„.\\�... \ '�imul G .' t - (' .%, :mu Ili.tiN I..,,, . - 71- AG 0 [1:z :1HH1-10I111-1111 4 III . ,` g= '4d L4 69Z ik.,aa (3)'d'8 tt9104 -, 13Jd ` 1. 0 �,,_ ` . i,,.....---_: \t,f ., , , � .I}H 11141-H I ;fi 4./416._11111LIHLL al 01 ' 0---`O ( -. WjO1VJX oNaT1e `' - -- J"' -•1' ,mac; OV o ry I L_ _ „uti.a 4 )'=_ 6 //11 MN_'/ co it,!-7, T kl r / a, O y �, 07. CO MN N N 1 1 m ::: Ca < CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION !1► an*, CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM r . ES d' VICINITY MAP „ _ SUR 97 0015 a ifir.„...) , Target store Mansion 1 ; 9.1M 1 .'' . Q.?.4 I 0111 14 4 4iii,„ ■ z SU a„ PAP Tli lore \k4 Lnil t' Atrii LI - 14gri 11, I] 111.605 -'-\-,. N iii , I . 1 0 400 P 800 Feet n 1 =555 feat 90RD • A r !t City cif Tigard �� Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. yy LEHMANN 13125 SW Hall Blvd C5� Tigard,OR 9171 (503)639-4171 hdp:thw w.ei.b0ard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Dec 11. 1997: c:lmaaiclmaaicdd.aDr SDk 91— DO/5 TPre6 C-T EX.PA-Ns10N (PG, /of.q) EXHIBIT B 1 S 126B0-00100 1 S 12680-02101 PORTLAND CITY OF BEIM&JAMES PROPERITES III 8200 SW SCHOLLS FRY RD 15 SW COLORADO AVE BLDG 1 #G BEAVERTON, OR 97005 BEND,OR 97702 1S126BC-00300 1S126BC-00500 PROGRESS SQUARE PARTNERS OLSON PETER G-TRUSTEE 50 SW PINE ST 520 SW YAMHILL PORTLAND, OR 97204 PORTLAND,OR 97204 1S126BC-00600 1S126BC-00701 CARNIG JOSEPH C KOWSUN PETER P AND 8900 SW HALL BLVD 7240 SW 84TH PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126BC-00800 1S126BC-00900 PROGRESS WATER DISTRICT WASHINGTON SQUARE INC 6501 SW TAYLORS FRY RD P 0 BOX 21545 PORTLAND, OR 97223 SEATTLE,WA 98111 1S126BC-01500 15126BC-01506 PORTLAND HOTEL ASSOCIATES PORTLAND OFFICE ASSOCIATES 3801 150TH AVE SE STE 300 14205 SE 36TH#123 BELLEVUE,WA 98006 BELLEVUE,WA 98006 1S126BC-01700 1S126BC-90000 MCGILL ANITA M TRUSTEE AND BRIGHT FIELD VILLAGE CONDO 1662 GRAFF CT 278 SW ARTHUR SAN LEANDRO, CA 94577 PORTLAND, OR 97201 1S126BC-92000 1S126BC-92011 FAIRVIEW PLACE CONDOMINIUMS POWELL CLIFFORD F/LURLYN L OWNERS OF UNITS 8950 SW FAIRVIEW PLACE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126BC-92022 1S126BC-92031 WALLACE WARNER ELDON TR DAVIS MARY ANN 9655 SW NORTH DAKOTA#10 900 CYPRESS POINT LN TIGARD,OR 97223 ASHLAND,OR 97520 1S126BC-92042 1S126BC-92051 DUNCAN RICHARD GLENN GUTHRIE ROBERT Z AND 8947 SW FAIRVIEW PLACE 8946 SW FAIRVIEW PL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126BC-92062 1S126BC-92071 SNOW MERIANNE M L MONTEITH JOHN H&HELEN BONITA 8945 SW FAIRVIEW PL 8944 SW FAIRVIEW PL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 5o2 47-066- -7-71-R-65-7" -XP 5ioN Mg. ,..?e,c-1) 1S126BC-92082 1S126BC-92091 SCHWAB MARY KAY FOSBACK IVAN 8943 SW FAIRVIEW PLACE#8 8942 SW FAIRVIEW PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126BC-92102 1S126C0-01100 MAINS JOHN R AND MURIEL I WASHINGTON SQUARE PLAZA 8941 SW FAIRVIEW PLACE BY THE CAFARO COMPANY TIGARD, OR 97223 FLORHAM PARK, NJ 7932 1 S 126C0-01107 1 S 126C0-01111 WASHINGTON SQU HUDESMAN DAVID&LINDA CO TRS P 0 BOX 2,1 7000 MARINA BLVD ,SEAM LE,WA 98111 BRISBANE,CA 94005 1S126C0-01200 1S126C0-01300 DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION WASHINGTON SQUARE INC 777 NICOLLET MALL P 0 BOX 2154 /- MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 E,WA 98111 1S126C0-01302 1S126C0-01403 WASHINGTON SQUARE1-NC MAY DEPT STORES COMPANY THE P O BO2i845 611 OLIVE STREET SEf&-LE,WA 98208 ST LOUIS, MO 63101 1 S126C0-02000 WASHINGTON S INC SLS ASSOCIATES, INC. PO BO 5 925 YGNACIO VALLEY ROAD A 98111 SUITE 233 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION 33 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 CITY of TIGARD kin , -.■ ,1,1„111= GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 1111111,ff4r I:: .,— R 11 �11��♦ fir■ WPC A AREA NOTIFIED ■ �1IR ....-.„.. SDR97-0015 ,,,,,'= . �,3 Target Store Expansion P. 1IIIIIII� C P70: ii liii, ••;•:: a. in railialmlIrm • r - . III W. r ;: .1 ma 411,111 IIIIIP 111 , A 1;"4.' r : lovl I" 1 rade milli :11111 pr .. il 4 _ sly • ,._ 1 P li:' . 10, d .. ar,, ...iir d, f;1 ■iniab®/1 ,f r11111111 • _f--- i II 1E1 1111 L ... Regal .. . .....a ird " Rill FRI: =1111r1 r. Emil ki,_ .1,11, 1 Iiii1IiI:' I r N• D MIME _ / 0 400 800 1200 Feet 1 \1111 F. 1•:801 teal . I1 T l=i________4IL III"" III 1 Ailk City of Tigard 1 ma■'_,■ Information on this map is for general location ony and should be verified with the Development Services Division. I I I I �� I 13125 SW Hall Blvd 1 . — + I A • ' Tpard,OR 97223 .. I (50.3)8394171 .�� Al -• • http:/fwww.ci.tgard.or_us Community Development Plot date: Dec 16. 1997: c:lmaaic\maaicdd.aor APPLICANT MATERIALS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: ✓y/25: 7 DATE OF PRE-APP.: 9//g 7 Property Address/Location(s): 9009 Sw � FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): Case No.(s): t' 97 _erOf 4 S 12(o C Oo 63-425- /2,0v Other Case No.(s): �85 �O Receipt No.: - ? / 4 Site Size: ` � ,.. Application Accepted By: Cif •C) Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)•: .Z:) /o-7 Car zip Date: - C �v2 / " Address: 3-3 c5:2vj�, S4K2I- .5/ Phone: City: /2s / d7"/V Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: JZ-S J /A-2G. . Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 925o! r?�c✓o 44.7/23 4..0hone: City:�C�u,� f ee Zip: CIT Area: •When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Rev.4!21!97 i:kurpintmasters\sdra.doc authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) • must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): ® Owner's Signature/Written Authorization c� � � ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or ed El' Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) • Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2"x 11") ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) • Construction Cost Estimate ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) S Filing Fee (under 5100.000) $ 800.00 (s100,000-$999,999)....$1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+55/510.000) 1 ist any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as art of this application: i?c7rL2 JPPLICANTS: o consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as ascribed on the front of this application In the"Required Submittal Elements" box. 7etailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) HE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: n�II • • •►• . \-►• Y•1 • • :_- 1 I . 1 A . - • 1 • -•=a• t=•111•!••1 •1 . 11 . •►. . fir. 1 :►• • • •11 •a•�ti • •• 1 1 • z•!ttia+` If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of ta.cdi owner of the subject property. DATED this 2‘7 day of .�l � 19 9'7 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature wner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT F3539.20(ED.7-96) TARGET STORES THE ATTACHED CHECK IS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED-BELOW. P.O. BOX 1392 IF NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY US PROMPTLY.NO RECEI' =SIRED. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55440 DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT associates, inc. November 28, 1997 Ms Julia Hajduk City of Tigard 13125 Southwest Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Target Building Expansion 9009 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR SLS Project # 97-1253 Dear Julia: As we discussed, I am submitting application for the proposed Target Store Building Addition for city review. Enclosed please find the following: 1. Site Development Review application. 2. Applicant's Statement 3. Application checklist 4. Architect's construction cost estimate. 5. 18 copies of Site, Grading, and Landscape plans, and Building elevations. 6. 1-8 %2 x 11 reduced copy of plans. 7. Check# 378557 for $1,949.00 filing fee) Please review the enclosed and let me know if you have any questions, comments or if any further information is needed. Best regards, Chris Long Project Manager CML/vw Enclosures cc: Mr. Jim Tucker j:197-12531correspolhajduk.doc WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA IRVINE, CALIFORNIA ENGINEERING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 • Walnut Creek • California 94596 510.943.5225 Fax 510.943.5718 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS=4/14/98 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 91-0015 FILE TITLE: TARGET STORE EXPANSION APPLICANT: SLS Associates, Inc. OWNER: Dayton Hudson Corporation 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 33 South Sixth Street Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Minneapolis, MN 55440 (510) 943-5225 (Fax) 510-943-5718 86! REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to expand the existing Target store by 19,31"6 square feet for a total of square footage of 122,224. LOCATION: 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: Monday - December 29,1997 K STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: Thursday - January 22,1997 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION K VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN K NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haiduk, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 x407 SDR 97-0015 TARGET STORE EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS itedilppo CITY OF TIGARD December 15, 1997 OREGON Chris Long and Greg Friel SLS Associates, Inc. 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 RE: Notice of Acceptance of Site Development Review (SDR) 97-0015 Dear Mr. Long: Staff has received the additional information required to deem your application complete. In addition, we received the revised site plan proposals. Therefore, this letter is to inform you that your application has been accepted as complete and we will begin reviewing your proposal. A decision is tentatively scheduled to be made by January 22, 1997. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning your application. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner i:\curpin\julia\sdr\Target2.acc c: SDR 97-0015 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 ()TARGET mervyn's Property Development December 8, 1997 RECEIVED P L4NNING Ms. Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner DEC 1 0 1997 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Target Store T-0345 Washington Square Washington Circle Plaza Tigard, OR Dear Ms. Hajduk: This letter is to inform you that SLS Associates has been retained by and is authorized by Target Stores, a division of Dayton Hudson Corporation, to prepare and submit planning documents to the City of Tigard on our behalf. Please contact Jim Tucker at 612/304-6453 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Target Stores Jim Bowser V.P. - Store Planning cc: Jim Tucker John Cornell Chris Long - SLS Associates 33 South Sixth Street . Minneapolis, MN 55402 December 3, 1997 Chris Long CITY OF TIGARD SLS Associates, Inc. 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 OREGON Walnut Creek, CA 94596 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal - SDR 97-0015 Dear Mr. Long: Staff has completed a preliminary review of the application materials submitted for the Target Store expansion at 9009 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S126CO3 Tax Lot 01200. The following information is required before staff can consider your application complete and begin review: 1. Title Transfer Instrument or Deed to Verify Ownership. 2. Signature of Current Property Owner or the Owner's Written Authorization. The application was signed by Chris Long but we need something from Dayton Hudson Corp. authorizing him to act on behalf of the company. 3. Evidence of the Neighborhood Meeting. We received a copy of the affidavit of posting the notice but did not receive an affidavit of mailing notice, a copy of the letter sent, or a copy of the sign up sheet from the meeting held with interested citizens/affected property owners. 4. Proposed Site and Surrounding Properties. Please provide a better picture of the surrounding properties. Show any structures and parking areas within at least 25 feet of the property lines of the subject parcel. Once the required information has been submitted, staff will deem the application complete and begin the review process. The 5-6 week estimated time to render a decision is based on the date the application is accepted as complete. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information or if you have any questions. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner i:'curpin\ulia\sdr\Target.acc c: SDR 97-0015 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 APPLICANTS STATEMENT TARGET T-345 9009 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR Target Stores (Dayton Hudson Corp.) is proposing to add 19,316 SF to the existing Target store. The addition will be located along the west side of the existing building, over what is currently a parking and landscape area. This addition will expand the sales floor, storage and receiving areas. The projects architecture will be similar and consistent with the existing building. Currently the Target store is 101,614 SF with 3,294 SF mezzanine. The addition will bring the total Target building area to 122,224 SF. This is a 161/2 % increase in floor area. The project site is currently zoned General Commercial (C-G) and the proposed expansion is allowable under that zoning. Circulation into and out of the site will not be affected by the project. The project will remove the drive aisle and parking immediately west of the existing building, which will require only minimal modification to the on-site circulation. The site currently contains parking for 506 cars with a mix of standard and compact stalls. The expansion of the store will reduce the parking by 63 stalls bringing the proposed total parking to 443 stalls, well above the required 306 stalls. The project will not result in significant increase in runoff as the majority of the expansion area is currently paved. No increase in plumbing fixtures is projected and any changes in utility consumption will be minimal. Target is expanding the Tigard store as part of a national program of updating popular stores to respond to customer needs for wider aisles and improved interior layout. Additional stockroom will also be created . • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r,� APPLICATION CHECKLIST �� CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: J Date: -V APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) ❑ B) Owner's signature/written authorization e5 C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed 112 D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies /P E) - Filing Fee $ Su 1 . s %t SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(SUPLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 1. Vicinity map .1c/ 2. Site size & dimensions +� 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table C (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats G (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 0 8. Location of existing structures and their uses " >Y 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources C 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 4--;.f,,, <r, .,/-w ` ` a-- 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLICATION,UST PACE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development Plan indicating: No. of Copies !Y 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties ra'' 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties t� (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area —42/ (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation p,)/ (e) Outdoor common areas f±( ' (f) Above ground utilities t 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions tpr 7. Sanitary sewer facilities e! 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes Npp� 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements 7 et" C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios •w xi--- (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ,w I CQ---- (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development o 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE ' OF 5 D) Architectural Drav s Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures /iv proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies /' The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable .ttEr— 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings N/t' 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open space 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions �,�e� (b) Erosion control measures that will be used tam F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating:.No. of Copies 1 . The owner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authorized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) i•ch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel location and boun• .ries ❑ 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the p. el 6. Location of all permanent build' gs on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all -ater courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees w- in 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements ❑ 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A.scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any 0plicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable c LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 3 OF 5 I) Subdivision Prelimi v Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑, 2. The proposed name of the subdivision C 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) / ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-fo t intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) , Domestic water mains including fire hydran ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines 0,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ • (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spat s, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of propos d sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above gr0und level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing u es of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to rem in after platting c 19. Supplemital information including: (a) Pr posed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) oof of property ownership ❑ (C) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Exiting natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If ny of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application LAND LSE APPLICATION.'LIST PACE 4 OF 3 J) Solar Access Calculations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of C. es ❑ h:Uogmbatty4nutersU<idist.mst Mav 23.1995 LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 DII ARCHITECT November 11, 1997 Denali Heath,Archllecl Mr.Greg Friel 1115 Altanllt Amax SLS Associates 925 Ygnacio Valley Road hut rD1 Suite 233 Alameda,CA 54501 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 1el 51D-6656663 Re: Target Store T-345 Fax 510.666 1611 Washington Square, OR DH Project No: 17024/2CV Dear Greg: Per your request, the following is a cost breakdown for the expansion only of the above mentioned project as taken from the November 5°i, 1997 'Scope of Work". It is our understanding that the following numbers will be used for the purposes of computing the Planning Department Permit Fees: Stock Room Addition $845,851.00 Dock Addition $ 70,140.00 Sales Addition $244,180.00 Total $1,160,171.00 Please call if you have any questions. Bob Meza was not available to confirm the above numbers, but, a copy will be sent for his review. Sincerely, DH Architect c �^ Mary M. Klein Project Manager cc: Mike Klein-Target Project Architect Jim Tucker-Target Real Estate Bob Meza-Target Construction AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OCT 1 ? WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTLNG,RETURN THIS AF-IWAVIT TO: ". City of Tigard: ,,, Y : Planning Division • : . 13125 SW Hal Boulevard' . Tigard,OR 97223 1, /6111 (t/<�%S iry do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed Target Store Expansion affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 9009 SW Hall Boulevard , and did on the 7 cn day of October 19 97 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Site Development Review application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at re- 4 T P(Lt-#$-, of e7 i I4tu- t5bvu'1/s'fr (state location you posted notice on property) 4)711 Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) — (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBUC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/aftlrmed before me on the 7 day of Od , 19 /7 MARY RANDALL '1 -.}- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Ara` �s COMMISSION NO. 049961 1 NOTARY PUB IC O OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.28,1999 f My Commission •ires: (Applicant, please complete inior-adon below for proper placement:with proposed project) E E N-kME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: '1 TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of ApplicinvOwner. 1_Address or C-eneral Location of Subject Property: LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot-(s): J J n...kn m+pairorasten de poser.st • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) 1, Gregory P. Friel , being duly swom, depose and say that on October 6 , 19 97 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 9009 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Walnut Creek, CA with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the 0 day of < c-t,0--r--4(- , 19 `:*.1 PHYL1S auRRrrT Apt caret an* i i 442!6 ' Notar Public-C 'iitani° f NOTARY P BLIC OF OREGON z `s iwf Co*a Costa cour�1y Mycc,. ��, My Commission Expires: (Applicant. lease complete infortnatron below for proper placement with proposed project) rcAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: Target TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:Site Development Review !Name of AppiicancOwner Dayton Hudson Corporation Address or General?.ocaron of Subject Property 9009 S.W. Hall Boulevard ;S , ; 1 Si-26-C0-0110D ..t.b,ect_..,ce^y Tax Map(s) and Lot T(si: r1.40c mDanymasterswriTh illst October 6, 1997 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR TARGET Dear Interested Party: SLS associates, inc. is the representing the owner of the project located at 9009 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 7:00 PM Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Please notice this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (510) 943-5225 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Gregory P. Friel SLS associates, inc. F:\CLERICAL\96-1253\CORRES P\NOTILETT.DOC ow"1,e,I2 MetroScan / Washington (t Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone R0235463 Progress Square Partners 8840 SW Hall Blvd Portia R0235472 Olson Peter G - Trustee 8860 SW Hall Blvd Portia R0235560 Portland Hotel Associates 9000 SW Washington Squar R0235588 Washington Square Inc 8865 SW Hall Blvd Tigard R0235659 Progress Water District *No Site Address* R0235686 Beim/James Properties Iii SW 9120/40/60/80 Hall R0236569 Washington Square Plaza 9045 SW Hall Blvd Tigard R0236587 Washington Square Inc 9500 SW Washington Squar R0236596 Washington Square Inc 9400 SW Washington Squar R0236649 Washington Square Inc *No Site Address* R0236667 Washington Square Inc 9210 SW Washington Squar R0236685 May Dept Stores Company Th 9400 SW Washington Squar 314-342-6300 R1120441 Bright Field Village Condo *No Site Address* R1120478 Blanchard Osborn 8852 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120502 Peterson Joseph T & Tami K 8840 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120511 Holts James 8836 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-526-0706 R1120557 Hellstern Joseph L 8820 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 541-752-0821 R1120566 Hall Mary Ellen 8816 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120584 Brooks Jeffery R & Lori L 8808 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120619 Ellmaker Lee A & Florence 8728 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-292-6274 R1120664 Bentley Patricia Kay 8708 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120673 Mceniry Michael K 8704 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120691 Mccarter James W Mary B 8652 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120726 Lenahan Richard M & Kathie 8640 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120744 Lutz Development Co 8632 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-644-9106 R1120815 Clearwater Robert E 8604 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120842 Aylwin Margaret 8544 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120851 Williams Robert D 8540 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120860 Bowman Terry Clark 8536 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-646-6376 R1120879 Laraway Wendy E 8532 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-293-9027 R1120888 Krasausk Paul E Et Al 8528 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120913 Sheinkman Josif 8516 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-244-1974 R1120931 Wells Brian S & Marla F 8508 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120977 Francis Lila C 8627 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120995 Johnson Joan S 8631 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-228-2593 R1121011 Phoenix Investments Llc 8623 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121048 Joyce Don H 8617 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121066 Nickerson Brian R & Ann M 8637 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-591-1645 R1121084 Joyce Don H 8613 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121093 Myers Kevin D 8615 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-244-0241 R1121100 Joyce Donald H 8641 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121119 Ellmaker Carol S 8643 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-292-6274 R1121128 Lavoie Vonda 8609 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121155 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8647 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121164 B & J Nielsen Partnership 8605 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121173 Criswell Charles D & Phyll 8607 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121191 Yoder Orlin H & Susan E 8651 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121226 Richert Jeffrey Lee & Kris *No Site Address* 1974 R1121235 Smith Winifred K 8655 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-244-4872 R1121271 Stuewe Dale V & Cynthia A 8703 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121280 Krasausk Paul E Et Al 8709 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121306 Yoder Orlin H & Susan E 8713 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121315 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8715 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121324 Joyce Don H 8721 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121333 Joyce Don H 8723 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan / Washington (C Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone R1121342 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8717 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121351 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8719 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121360 Maier Linda Ann 8725 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121379 Corby Mariam Jane 8727 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-644-9383 R1121388 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8729 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121397 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8731 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121404 Hellstern Joseph L & Debor 8737 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 541-752-0821 R1121413 Yoder Orlin H & Susan E 8739 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121422 Rhoades Gene H 8733 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-643-3630 R1121431 De Ocampo Antonio Y 8735 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121459 Bankers Trust Company Of C 8743 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121468 Hellstern Joseph L & Debor 8745 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 541-752-0821 R1121486 Langtry Hillary J 8753 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121495 Hewitt William C 8755 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121501 Kryszek Sophia 8749 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121510 Hellstern Joseph L 8751 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 541-752-0821 R1121529 Stryker John L 8807 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121538 Mcgee Ronald 8801 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121556 Joyce Don H 8813 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121565 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8815 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121574 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8809 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121583 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8821 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121609 Taylor Lee Ann 8819 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121618 Dunn Robert M 8827 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-635-1219 R1121627 Klejmont Francis H & Peggy 8825 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121636 Rhine D David & Margaret A 8831 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121654 Joyce Enterprises Inc 8835 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121663 Hogen Michael C/Julia L 8833 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121681 Behrens Veryl E & Linda Su 8837 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121690 Anderson Marsha J 8847 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121707 Spencer Paul & Neva 8845 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-254-2565 R1121716 Anderson Marsha J 8843 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121725 Joyce Don 8841 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1123260 Wood Albert E L & Alice M 8811 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1165973 Kowsun Peter P 8930 SW Hall Blvd Portia R1207642 Fairview Place Condominium *No Site Address* R1207660 Wallace Warner Eldon Tr 8949 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 R1207713 Schwab Mary Kay 8943 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207740 Branan Brock H & Patricia 8940 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 R1207759 Decker Sherith L 8939 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207795 Querner Steve 8935 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 R1207820 Mount Steven H 8932 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 R1207839 Kowsun Peter & Elaine H 8931 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 R1207848 Davis Mary Ann 8948 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 R1299543 Washington Square Inc *No Site Address* R1299552 Washington Square Inc 9350 SW Washington Squar R1433657 Washington Square Plaza *No Site Address* R1475674 Hudesman David & Linda Co 9045 SW Hall Blvd Tigard R2007147 Portland Office Associates 9020 SW Washington Squar R2007148 Portland Office Associates *No Site Address* The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan / Washington (e A Q`V Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone R0235631 Carnig Joseph C 8900 SW Hall Blvd Portia R1120450 Deckert Linda Catherine D 8860 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-643-6802 R1120469 Lyons James E 8856 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-626-4839 R1120487 Seidl Helen L 8848 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120496 Davis Todd E/Galynne N 8844 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120520 Kofsky Carrie L 8832 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120539 Arganbright Jennifer A 8828 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120548 Ray Deidra Jean 8824 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120575 Tibbetts Mildred M 8812 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120593 Rezzonico Barbara 8804 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-641-2573 R1120600 Sibert Patricia J 8800 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120628 Hoduffer Chrys 8724 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120637 Klein Steve D 8720 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120646 Coronel David A & Sandra L 8716 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120655 Schultz Elaine D 8712 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-641-5285 R1120682 Kamprath Virginia 8700 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120708 Schultheis Kurt Christophe 8648 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-644-2301 R1120717 Roden Patrick J 8644 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120735 Hunt Kristine C 8636 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-643-3029 R1120753 Taylor Ethel D 8628 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-643-1177 R1120762 Crittenden Kurt W 8624 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120771 Peery David P 8620 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120780 Longueil Jeffrey D 8616 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120799 Marshall Griffith M 8612 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120806 Edmiston Michael 8608 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120824 Lake Barbara L 8600 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-626-0598 R1120833 Munson Marlene Joann 8552 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120897 Montes-De-Oca Lucio 8524 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-644-4638 R1120904 Taylor Charles F Jr 8520 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-644-8305 R1120922 Senger Doris Graham 8512 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120940 Vandeventer Shelby 8504 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120959 Swanson Yvonne 8500 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-520-0320 R1120968 Parks Mechelle H 8625 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1120986 Kimbrell Karla 8629 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121002 Bassett Jeffrey E 8621 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121020 Noble David R/Monica M 8633 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121039 Redler Michael J 8635 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121057 Moreland Diane M 8619 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121075 Hauser E Carol 8639 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121137 Stamm Josephine Penglichan 8611 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121146 Heinitz Gary 8645 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121182 Maria G Geske A Life Estat 8649 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121208 Stevens Paul E 8601 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121217 Buelna Harold J 8603 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121244 Akins Margaret E;Coronel S 8705 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121253 Greblo Todd E 8707 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121262 Crowley Michael J/Jane 8701 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121299 Boughner Robert D 8711 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-643-1483 R1121440 Bookout P Jeanine/Gregory 8741 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121477 Brunner Judith E 8747 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121547 Brady Goy M & Cary M 8803 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-646-7804 R1121592 Widman Floria A 8823 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121645 Mcbride Zina L 8829 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1121672 Saxon Peter 8839 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 R1122920 Nguyen Andre 8548 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan / Washington (t Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone R1123251 Hardy Webster A 8805 SW Brightfield Cir 1974 503-520-0831 R1207651 Powell Clifford F & Lurlyn 8950 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207679 Duncan Richard Glenn 8947 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207688 Guthrie Robert Z Et Al 8946 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207697 Snow Merianne M L 8945 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207704 Monteith John H & Helen Bo 8944 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207722 Fosback Ivan 8942 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 503-641-6323 R1207731 Mains John R & Muriel I 8941 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 503-646-8727 R1207768 Miller Sue M 8938 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 503-643-8094 R1207777 Asbahr Janet L 8937 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 503-641-5146 R1207786 Schun Jeffrey 8936 SW Fairview P1 Tiga 1980 R1207802 Bilozertchev Dmitri 8934 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 R1207811 Hunt Steven B 8933 SW Fairview P1 Port 1980 503-641-6383 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 19- 12-08 10:26 #847 P.02/07 -FROM : p,r ,fit ;O; •- . Ei • - Oe 86059198 1 kst)/(r/ ......-': ¢r '' STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED DONALD L. SCHECHIA, also known as Donald L. Scheckla, the d duly appointed and acting Personal Representative of the Estate 'i • ? 'ego of Lena D. Scheckla, also known as Lena B. Scheckla, (as to an undivided one-half interest in and to the following-described 4;• tireal property), Crantor, hereby conveys and warrants to DAYTON 44;: , ._ HUDSON CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation, Grantee, all of his �. R � right, title and interest In and to the following-described real ',,.� • property located in Washington County, Oregon: �.ji,� ^=,, An undivided one-half interest in that certain tract of land k**� i r.-= ,3 described on Exhibit "A," attached hereto and by this r' t.;;" reference incorporated herein. . EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above-described tract located within the following-described tract: :ie A tract conveyed to Donald Lawrence Scheckla, et ux, by deed recorded January 17, 1961, in Rook 439, page 755, Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records, described as follows: I.-1' Beginning at a pout in the roadway of State Highway No. r 217, and which point is North 1° 03' East 735.5Z feet and • • North 64° 16' West 1177.5 feet from the Southwest corner of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said • Section 26, and going thence South 2° 10' West 32,7 feet to an iron pipe; thence continuing South 2° 10' West along the , Easterly line of a private roadway a distance of 210.0 feet 'i to an iron pipe: thence South 64° 16' East 72.04 feet to an • iron pipe; thence North 25° 44' East 130,24 feet to an Iron pipe on the Southerly line of a public highway; thence 1 continuing North 25° 44' East 30.00 feet to a point; thence • in the roadway North 64° 16' West 169.06 feet to .he true point of beginning. SUBJECT TO an easement created by inscrl'ment, including the i. terms and provisions thereof, recorded June 3, 1953, in ±! Book 345, Page 343, in the Records of Washington County, Oregon, in favor of Portland Ceneral Electric Company, an Oregon corporation. , FURTHER SUBJECT 'r0 the rights of the public in and co that portion of the herein-described property lying within the limits of S. W. Hall Boulevard. • *(Further exc.ent.ons on nave 2.) • THIS INSTRUMENT WILL, NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED . IN THIS INSTRUMENT :N VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE . PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE ' APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED • I USES. . _ 91 '°, WASNINGTON COUNTY Page 1 _ `:=! ,,i REAL PROPERTY rimiesce, TAX a �� OW.op �J0•R L . ..‘,Se FEE NOD DATE _ Ctrl: - _ • • FF ti "L:••ti,''.• ,r 71012'1 - '. ate••. t .1• 199 •12-08 1 :27 #847 P.Ø3/Ø7 ROM : . .. ow - • • . ! -• - -. • ' j•• * • '• ' •-•••-%./ '' .•'r.- ,q' INMIllroCc4r-• .• . ' .1' ......A. •--V--ti-'1:.:",'4V•411q-71%. .. • - I *.: .;' P. 4.0;;.;C11,4* ;,i..:. ..*.i. : ...,k,,4••• : .• . .*;',-- *. ....'..•'";%* ,:t7.S.14.',VVIt: Y ... i.'11:. • .' . . • • ''.:. l'•/' I ' . ,..*.,•::).•t.:;19:`......-,4:4 •4..„:••:::. ,•• '-k-1•i*4' I ';•#1-6•,' • ...;':'.. '''' " • - •' ' ).. ' '''. ' • '.• .,...'i,t . 1.fk.f,i,--, • •..:: ••• . * ,.:I..: •• .:- ..,q --,--- ‘",(fan' 4444 - ±:•'••••Vf- !,'''.' Th--1 ;:1., ...-..:....1:.% tt.: *.'..... .. •i • .i v' . • • •:. • • .- . . . . .,-.. .„.. , V.- l•l. • 1 i t' The true consideration Co this conveyance is $2,061,545.77. 4. DATED this j/5 day of/ adefil/kir 1966 et . .;,,.: ,• STATE OF OREGON ) 1 County of Multnomah BS W- . On the LI: day of , 1986, personally appeared. ... Donald L. Sche-C-Fla and acZw.tedged the foregoing to be his •voluntary act and deed. e•• . - . • ., .. . - • -;,:,‘....0,'...I I,t. I Notary u c or regon.„. '.. . a .v•-• .. '... .. . . .., - • After Recording Return To and All Future Tax Statements To '... •;:.:.-;::..•••• . i Dayton Hudson Corporation Dayton Hudson Corporation '".--, ...-. -.-, ,,,. ,... .. • l• k ' i • . 1 33 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minn 55440 Attn: Mr. Richard Brooks *(Further exceptions) 33 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minn 55440 Attn: Mr. Richard Brooks: Regulations, including levies, liens, ass/Ismer:ea, rights of way - and easements of the Unified Sewerage Agency. . .. I •:.• . i ...-: . .' , . . , ;\ • Any special assessments, additional tax, interest and/or penalty .-. . t. incurred by reason of the premises being disqualified for special i •• ... assessment for farm use. ' •i- • 1.. I...' . . rf- ; p • i• i . ;. •-. ::. F. ;'::: • 'i,':',:'• )..._. c) . :..1...:!:!. Page 2 , . .....-.. • ....■.......".177•1•%%,.• • . t . . .,H,,,„,„-,,,-: :-.-,,x....... .; .._ . . ... . .....';._, - . . '.'::,--e,,iprce....,....:- .....-...- •: -.' . ':i••••I:'. '4--..tirl,•*,:"......,,Y i.e...,.! • ' • •• ......• • . ::• .•..- ...4..7 ..ilz..),4..... . ,'•• -1..N.1/4 •p) ••'.4.7.:ev.-,--.....'!-. - - ... ...,• --,; .. . 7ty,,,,J ..!..af'-'..'-43.-,41-....4•7'z. -'••• -., • .. -•-. - - • -. . . :•:.:'..'!;!.;y4.3:....-c ....v..,•,.:..... , ..„ ,........ - r;:%,..r.:%...:. ......:• .. .;1"-71:i ' ".. • • . . , . -•• ' - • . , , . . . 199 12-08 10:27 #847 P.04/07 FRUM : y 'T.40.'?.;-'...-.-- �! - '=•:r[; yr+ ,Ir ,•. - ' . r4 ' LAJ C]' 1 Property Description Dec. 16, 1986 • , Parcel l File No. 86-1394 • 1,'• Description of a Parcel of land situated in the S.W. 1/4 suction 0 26, Township 1 South, Rance 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washing- . ' ? ton County, Oregon being a portion of that certain tract of land • described in Rook 909 Page 727, Recorded March 16, 197: and a , portion of that certain tract of land described in Book 439 Page 755, Recorded Jan. 17, 1961, Washington County Deed Records. said { parcel Of land being more particularly described as follows) • Commencing at the initial point of '•OAKSURO", a recorded plat; thence South e9°40.224° East along the North line thereof 458.37 1; . - feet to a point in the West line of a tract of land Recorded in %87 book 245 Page 639; thence North 00'12'53' East along sate line felt' •and the West line of that tract of land Recorded in Book 576 Pape :144 194, 1983.00 feet to the most Westerly Northwest Corner of said Book 576 Page 196 and the point of beginnings thence North 00' " 12'53" East 30i).67 feet; (thence North 00•20'0B" East 656.14 feet MS►,`'u� to a point 30.00 feet Southwesterly of (when measured et right "•,;F" !• angles) the centerline of B.W. Hall Boulevards thence South 46' -••• r, 21'24" East parallel to said centerline 501.69 filet •o a point 30.00 feet right of Engineer's Centerline Station 314+2e.22 P.C.) I thence along the arc of a tangent 602.62 foot radius curve left 1E.' 119.65 feet through a central angle of It 22.35" (the long chord r bears South 52'02'41" East 119.46 feet) to a point therein; thence South 52616'0l" West (radial to S.W. Hall Boulevard) 19.00 feet) thence along the arc of a tangent 196.99 foot radius curve left 109.78 feet through a central angle of 31°55'53" :the long chord bears South 16-1B-0S" West.108.37 feet); thence tangent to said curve South 00420'08" West 56.64 feet: thence South 67' 27'55" East eo.n.) feet; thence South 02°32'25" West 376.68 feet; thence, Worth 67$27'35" West 465.00 feet to the point of beginning. Cont.ining therein an arse of 351.606.6 square foes. (p.072 acres, more or less). f. 1 STATE Of OREGON ) ss • • It ti r 1 5 i r. County of wsanington . P110'avm:0_1'L I.00nnt.1 w.U.son.D"eclor of Ae9oesrtank I. ;I) C:11J1.t'11 { and Tereeon end Ex-01000 tocoCry of Con- +a ydydneos roe cold COON.CO hero=coiSN�� ' • ��I I' trio wants Incaument q elan I �—•T'cc/ It; and raurood In Doort o::wwds d sake county. r 1, .)'��f Donald W. Meson. D roct r of I I Addesvnant end 7e■OJcn. L:. ' i {ll ��'w•ia::i l�•f'l..'.L.. c. ogee Curti CAA i \ / • .....3 1986 DEC 18 f1112:56 • . ..,r......,,,:._,. . . • • • • -',4,.1-;i;.W.'' '.:: . C��'':•.n r u•�.�i did FROM 199 12-08 10:28 #847 P.05/07• • :�ti 1r":L'ley,it. /^"'i ~-. .5.°i:!'d.•• •'.i • rti. r is _f a!° ... . %8 ...- I I. :.1.~ • ;: ,/'i{r {•,. .1.:,••`!•...•. • . -. •• �-.- {. ..1':•ice.•• /'i , �1.i�1::,., ~! yy�1J " .:4,,44,1._ .1.-'4... .• W Q - ' ' i 86059197 r.\'b i .,pi STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED 7.. ":: E. ':. v DONALD L. SCI1E CH1_A, aleo known aa Donald L. Scheckla, and 8 SHIRLEY A. VALLERY, Trustees under the Lena B. Schechla, also 127,`-' known aa Lena B. Scheckla, Trust (aa to an undivided one-half interest in and to the following-described real property), ••�;'• N n_ Grantors, hereby convey and warrant to DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION, ..- 1'� , a Minnesota Corporation, Grantee, all of their right, title and :' 5 interest in and to the following-deacribed real ° a in Washington County, Oregon: g property located 'C • F„'�_ An undivided one-half interest in that certain tract of land r. • : -.. described on Exhibit "A,” attached hereto and by this 4, i.:. reference incorporated herein, ` Ij.;., EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion of the above-described tract `` _ located within the following-described tract: I. 1 A tract conveyed to Donald Lawrence Scheckla, or ux, by deed recorded January 17, 1961, in Book 439, page 755, Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records described a Y g as follows: i. t-1 Beginning at a point in the roadway of State Highway No. 217, and which point is North 1° 03' East 735.52 feet and 27' North 64° 16' West 1177.5 feet from the Southwest corner of ; the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said ; A. Section 26, and going thence South 2° 10' West 32.7 feet to :, an iron pipe; thence continuing South 2° 10' West along the Easterly line of a private roadway a distance of 210.0 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 64° 16' at 72.04 feet to an '` iron pipe; thence North 25° 44' East 190.24 feet to an iron 4 pipe on the Southerly line of a public highway; thence J. 1' continuing North 25° 44' East 30.00 feet to a point; thence I g:1 in the roadway North 64° 16' West 169.08 feet to the true :. point of beginning. :r• :f SUBJECT TO an easement created by instrument, including the •: terms and provisions thereof, recorded June 3, 1953, in 4 Book 345, Page 343, in the Records of Washington County, Oregon, in favor of Portland General Electric Company, an ,� Oregon corporation. • FURTHER SUBJECT TO the rights of the public in and to that .= portion of the herein-deacribed property lying within the e limits of S. W. Hall Boulevard. *(Further exceptions on page 2.) THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND f�� REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE T PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE '•' APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. •. Page 1 lo..,-.a -lCa Wasp,4TDM coGnrr 1- 3 %4,,l se —13.18 FIT Pmo OAYE 1 " • FROM 199 .12-08 10:28 #847 P.06/07 ■ :"."..f.:-.. t�Y .l l•i .MCI r,�. .•Y: �...ir..•7.1 ,? �� ',.T•• . `,`. :::•:.,')I1;, u :Af..-•-•:} .,4L '• ',-..5:.11',.',;-,' ., • iJ/ ti .c-... �'N`ti• , o '`' • r.' !OO . f ' 1: .Y w}'',1 The true consideration for this conveyance is $2,061,545.77. ;,;>,'�. DATED this /0 day of 986. 4':.. .4.4e..11241.4..1121. $.?. '7'1.4444.7 • STATE OF OREGON ) v / ., ) ss • • County of Multnomah ) • -..:' n,. e 21 day of _ c , , 1986, personally appeared al•Qth d I.:. SciFla and Shirley A. va1lery and acknowledged the ' D'an c. 1 roAdgbi'ng to be their voluntary a and dead. `6,� e i otary u c or regen ' w; My commission expires: 7 ��/I9 r.• Aftee•Recording Return To: and All Future Tax Statements To: ,.t. Dayton Hudson Corporation Dayton Hudson corporation • 33 South sixth Street 33 South Sixth Street •• Minneapolis, Minn 55440 Minneapolis, Minn 55440 • Attn: Mr. Richard Brooks Attn: Mr. Richard brooks - • *(Further exceptions) Regulations, including levies, liens, assessments. rights of way and easements of the Unified Sewerage Agency. Any special assessments, additional tax, interest and/or penalty 1• incurred by reason of the premises being disqualified for special assessment for farm use. i' • • I. • a • .•_ .; Page 2 :i't . VI • x=1:0 r5'r' 4,j..„1s1- 199 12-08 10:29 #847 P.07/07 . FROM :• 1- ' :,,,,!•n..::•tr.:.-.,-41— iTt .Z.t ,• 1.- • ... �,'. 1••.1 s yi}r.Gyi .. . .. . .. . . in''''.2 •4,..•i,..4:.:;F:44•:.•:.•''.'.';':'••::.•7•' •. 1 • Q �g , • • .1 •• f Property Duscriptlon Dec. 16, 19136 Parcel 1 File No. 86-1394 ;t• • S 1 Description of a Parcel of land situated in the 5.w. 1/4 bvction - 26, Township I South, Range I West, Willamette Meridian, Washing- • ton County, Oregon being • portion of that certain tract of land ` c described in Rook 909 Page 727. Recorded March 16, 1973 and a ',�'�+� portion of that certain tract of land described in Book 439 Page r.l`' 75$, Recorded Jan. 17, 1961, Washington County Dowd Records, said -.' Parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: af� Commencing at the initial point of "OAK8UR6", a recorded plat; 7 r r thence South 89'40'24" East along the Nnrth line thereof 458.37 y±:• I s - feet to a point in the West line of a tract of land Recorded in , 60011 245 Page 639$ thence North 0,)°12'55` East along raid line and the West line o4 that tract of land Recorded in Book 576 Page - j_ 196, 1983.00 feet to the most Westerly Northwest corner of said i.... Soak 576 Page 196 and the point of beginning: thence North 00' 1., 12'53" East ,•,09.87 foot; ,thence North 00'20'O8" East 656.14 feet to a point 30.00 feet Southwesterly of (when measured at right l•' angles) the centerline of S.W. Hall boulevard; thence South 46' 21 '24" Eat parallel to said centerline 501.69 feet to a point 30.00 feet right of Engineer's Centerline Station 314+29.22 P.C.; thence along the arc Of a tangent 602.62 foot radius curve it 119.65 feet through a central angle of 11 22.35" (the long chord bears South 52'02'41" East 119.46 feet) to a point therein; thence South 3; °16'01" West (radial to S.W. Wall bouldvard) 19.00 feet; thence along the arc of a tangent 196.99 foot radius curve left 109.78 feet through a central angle of 31'85.53" (the long chord '• bears South 16°18'05" West-109.37 feet); thence tangent to said curve South 00°20'09" West 58.64 feet; thence South 87' 27'35" • East 80.60 feet; thence South 02°32'25" West 376.86 feet; thence, North 87'227'35' West 403.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing therein an area of 351,606.8 oquara feet. (8.072 acres, more or le's). STATE OF OREGON S • 9 • County of Woehkrplon RIG'S TE.t;" .rr p. i Oeneb W.Meson,(Amor of Annesam°nl • Pl.Otii.?4..Q.f.\L , , Tn.-„inn and s.-o,eel°flacon:n,°l Cen- 7 f tD ç::r'r:':.i-r' vey°ne°e to set county,do nonsoy amq Ina! s Ina v,+llan Ol$411Jmp11 M w:ltklg woo rocoivnd f y,a nearddd M book of Iuaorde d sad ro,ery -'ttw I(I • . Ga,jtO W. Masan 0000or of • 1 : assn=went ens sold. Ex. JAI..i::V .SLJ'� f Oltkb CeaSy cloAc • , • 19860EC I8 PM12:55 -......i . t= 'ill- • • I'M' - •r Po' PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES RECEIVED PLANNING y5 associates, inc. SEP 0 5 1997 August 28, 1997 Q / /0 CITY OF TIGARD iga574 r/ Pie -f .0j) Ms Julia Hajduk c/,&r City of Tigard 13125 Southwest Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Target Building Expansion 9009 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR SLS Project # 97-1253 Dear Julia: As we discussed, I am submitting five copies of the proposed Target Store Building Addition Site Plan for your review, and in preparation for the pre-application meeting September 9, 1997. Target is proposing to split the proposed work into two phases. The first phase would involve construction of the building addition and necessary site improvements to accommodate the new building area. Secondly, Target's plans to remodel the entire store interior to include new fixtures, wider aisles, new lighting and an updated layout, which is more similar to Target stores built today. Please review the enclosed and let me know if you have any questions, comments or if any further information is needed. Best regards, Chris Long Project Manager CML/vw Enclosures cc: Mr. Jim Tucker j:\97-1253\cotrespo\hajduk.doc WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA IRVINE, CALIFORNIA ENGINEERING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 • Walnut Creek • California 94596 510.943.5225 Fax 510•943•5718 • • CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES .,i1; u,K1r° NON-RESIDENTIAL -DOTE sTAFF .r7//3R APPLICANT: /4r -kf.TM Tuckcr ��/J AGENT: ehr;s Lo Phone:[., [ 'Yoy- 6 S VS-3 3 Phone: 953'Sz25 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: • ad9 5(&) /ell TAX MAP/TAX LOT: , .5/ a6 OC //oo NECESSARY APPLICATION[S1: L i pn' echt Revie w PROPOSAL DESCRIPT.Ibh:• 6Qnc/ exis/i' T71- 5i4re fr. 24 S96 7 . ,CJ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Getrep/ a 07&tern.q/ • ZONING DESIGNATION: Gene. ,/ �'nMn�er,�,n , (n—G) CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Cgs FACILITATOR: .SC‹ ►TEAM AREA PHONE (5031 TONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: 50 sq. ft. Average lot width: .S ft. Maximum building height: 415 ft. setbacks: Front A ft. Si e ft. Rear , ft. Corner 7 ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: AS,% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /5 % [Refer to Code Section 18. C2,75`'l - DDITi0NA1 LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The cepth of all lots shall not exceed 2 - times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots] :TY OF TIGARD Pre-Apoticatlon Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 ;M-Ius1Uitlal aullculauMaaallf 1saa rang Section • • Post-it"routing request pad 7661 ROUTING - REQUE.. Please. / READ To ' v G� HANDLE P1BR / 613 APPROVE �B ✓ PL Fit and E' FORWARD RETURN /)57, 7� KEEP OR DISCA RD D S l I REVIEWq WITH ME Date 9 /7 From TU'iq SPECIAL SETBACKS '/ Streets I feet from the centerline of f'r4(1 Established areas: feet from Lower intensity zones: feet. along the site's boundary. Flag lot: 10-foot side yard setback. [Refer to Code Section and 18.961 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half (41) of the building's height: and ▪ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.98.0201 PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: / e1 y°° : arc rc€ Orr)" Poor Qre y13/o w' / , Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): `/ 7 aR1-cr 19arl:3;z5-v-, eC,pan5,an 0 Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): No more than 4U3o of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 8 inches x 18 feet. Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.0201 Handicapped Parking: ▪ All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions. are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 3o S—o Minimum pavement width: 2(177(.9 r All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: NAb [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Anpllcatlon Conference Not Page 2 of 8 OM-1s tIsattalappltcatfu/PtaaataiIsiartaaatSactln WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS Walkways Shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs. ramps. r elevators of all commercial. institutional. and industrial uses. to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building ` commercial. institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed li between a new development and neighboring developments. ` (Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10.000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at r ad/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area de ends upon the abutting street's functional classification. efer to Code Section 18.1021 _-- SUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments. especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities. and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along LANDSCAPI Str trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways ich are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or , n private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum . caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include speci. design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features •.y include the use of landscaped berms. decorative walls. and raised planters. For detailed inform. ..n or% design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Reter,to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.108) ;fTY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of S .A$-lasil.atlal a..11catl.aina..ia!Isoartaeat S.caim slsys- Sign permits must be obtained pnor to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sigp Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be' permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. Miler ts Cede Section*1141 ___ SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for developm a to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes inexcess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the Eespofisibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the aplicant. Areas meeting the definitions of - , . . - - a• ma •- - - I •as• -• •I • - 1.- •11.1 - • a • I - •- - ••••- • .•• - '•• Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. [Refer Is Cede Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must su mitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.B. The report shall be based uponlekLexploration antritivistigation and shall include specific recommendations for achie%_:,/irathe requirements of 18.84.040.6.2 and 18.84.040.8.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY LUSH BUFFER STANDARDS.R s 0 96-44 Pucpose: -- Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. ,/ Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally,,-from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the As- cy or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or C. to reduce the width of 4 portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shal •e directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum a •wable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percen • the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet i. idth. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor. No structures, development, construction activiti , gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activitie hall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegeta corridor, except as allowed below: A gravel walkway or bike pat , not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor- ust be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to isting vegetation; and Water qua rty facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. .mr OF n6ARD era-4ea0gtla■Cuteroaca Nato P*Ne 4 N$ $11-1s u•.u,i U,ecaU..ma..w k.art...c s.wf _• catign of Vegetated Corridor In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3.Design for SWM) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be pro 'ded for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subd- ision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Pro ction is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: : Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including tree 'designated as significant by the City; : Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.00.D. according to the following standards: - Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 1.2 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no'net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees o er 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated ac rding to Section 18.150.070.D; - Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing tree over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated cording to Section 18.150.070.D: Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existi trees over 12 inches in caliper requires n4 mitigation: : Identification of all trees which are proposed to b removed; and • A protection program defining standards and ethods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.025] / MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: : A replacement tree shall be substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of t e species of the tree removed er damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tre of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable. the Direc r shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formul : • The number Of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree r moved or damaged. by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If is number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property. the Director may require ne (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or. with the consent of the owner, private property. aITY OFT1GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 018 OM-1ssitsatlitisslIcItissiMusiagIs iii1 satSactlu The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may. with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. Meter to Code Section 18.150.010[D) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION Prior to submitting a Subdivision land use application with the City of Tigard, applicant's are to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Sury ice in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications . e accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation • . 66 = . = •m the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. ' . 1 Surveyor's Office: 648-8884) NARR ATIVE - - -- The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standar s. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application , incomplete and delay review of the proposal. J (Refer to Code Section 18.32) - — CODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.92 7 18.100 ✓ 18.108 '/' 18.120 18.150 18.84 18.96 ;/ 18.102 ,/ 18.114 _ 18.130 18.160 18.88 ./ 18.98 ./ 18.106 18.116 18.134 18.162 c— 18.164 IMPAJIST1DY As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study, with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways. the drainage system. the parks system. the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact. the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests. the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32.Section.0501 When a condition of approval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approv authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transfers d is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 _f- NEl$ —_,._-- — --� / The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning ite posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the applic tior1 will net be accented. efer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) 1ITY OF T16ABO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 :$l-Lslranir nruan.unwlq Unrvnt Sictln BUILDINGfEA ITS -- Plans for building.and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has been issued Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there �s compliance with all conditions of development approval. / RECYCLING Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Section 18.1161 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: fig:t� io. ?,.v ton !r ,y7 r'JJ h 1 e U 1 f fro,., (l 1//. to /A J/d & -6 h•. 1 L1• +S G i' 17 p1 G rtc/ --1 tr 1.i Li 7 ,/ // .> ( L O c 5-Cc- 7— M/ A mp /yL1 ,h c / FL) 1 WA-A/-1 -zoc1fe 7// e� � fixr toy r? e 'Kum," v lrzb � � C-I re (=roe, wvr v- /-ire ^ v A P ei 2y, cJr(Lk T F! 1. tlJ 1t ,pd,^ f PROCEDURE •'' Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Pubiic hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. 1PPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT bQ accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 842" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. 'ITY Of T1GARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Pagel of 8 aIauUYutla1 Ispart.utSettln • 4i ,S A4reo/ rh' The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public,appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the � Tigard %�4nn, ('omM . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from tie Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thiq pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following thiq conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: OF TIGARD MINE DNISION PHONE [503)639-4171 FAX: [503)684-7297 1,J S 5to lastly\2uters+Jmor-c_lst 'Earlu.rlrr Seats':asurs\an.0{..rrl n-Ysr-97 CITY OF Tf6AED Pre-AApifcatlan Conference Motes Page 8 of 8 011-1rsti..nrt,rrucitl.unaruy tl.raru..t Sevin FAA lyl zc„ C- PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION City of Tigard, Oregon PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1 .) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2 ) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) t feet fr centerline. ( ) to _feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessa along ( ) street improvements will be essary along Stre- improvements on shall include et of pavement from ce erline, plus the installation of rb and gutters, storm, sewers, u erground placement of ility wires (a fee ma be collet d if determined appropri e by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidew (sid alks may be required to be w r on arterials or major collector CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department Section streets, or in the Ce I Business District), necessary stn signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Street i rovements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, s the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Centratsiness District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year street lighting fee. ( ) Section 18.164.120 of the TMC req1Tes all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, i{ ts equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to is site along SW . Prior to , the applican hall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which wires e property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's nght to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for suc n agree nt: (1.) --- (2.) --- Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located Vi- ON -T O& . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to cam+ T 1-► r -1 t cs?,47, 44-Scr. SlC�UI CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineering Department Section D) Architectural Dr 'rigs Indicating: No. of Copies /? - The site develop, .it plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures r/ proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure ;/ E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings rtt- 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials r- 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions e " (b) Erosion control measures that will be used e� F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Mao Indicating: o. of Copies 1 . The owner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authorized agent G 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) i-ch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel location and boun•.ries ❑ 5. Location, width and names of streets, • asements and other public ways within and adjacent to the p. el 6. Location of all permanent build' gs on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all •ater courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees w' in 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater - an 25% ❑ 10. Location of exi ing utilities and utility easements ❑ 11 . For major la partition which creates a public street: (a) The •roposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) - A caled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any ,pplicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable LAND uSE APPUUT1oN I US; PACE 3 OF 3 I) Subdivision Prelir 3ry Plat Map and Data Indicating No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet 2. The proposed name of the subdivision 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-fo' t intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following ithin and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer Ii - ❑ (c) , Domestic water mains including fire hydran - - ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines 0,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spac-s, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of propos• • sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated o' the plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed water distribut'•n system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hy• .nts ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles s owing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of p posed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas ubject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & dir ion of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ • 16. The proposed lot co figurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Wher lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall a indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location of trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above grpund level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) /A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas 21 . If,any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the /preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application LAND USE APPtIGTION,LIST PACE.a Of i J) Solar Access Calculations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of C. = es ❑ h Nog in V arty\masienv-dd isLmsl Mau 23.1995 LAND LSE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 5 OF 5 •. i. ..i�jl:K•;.-• TARGET STORES ' SDR 87-17 Washing ton County File Number • 86-544 D/V/LLA 9009 SW Hall Blvd. Washington Square Circle 1S1 26C lots 1100 , 1101 & 1200 ft. retail outlet 157 , 330 sq. P �— renttro4 0L a f . , ,, • ,•;a . y • i .iii • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: `TN Date: 4. '57-9- 97 (APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENTS) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) I B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed R� D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies /? E) . Filing Fee S r - rtrf. 3 'sc/,7L I SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(SUPLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 1. Vicinity map 4{-7 2. Site size & dimensions .o 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) e� 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground • ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table c (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: C (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" caliper measured 4 feet from ground level c 8. Location of existing structures and their uses fY 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources c 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways +� LAND usE APPLICATION.'LIST PACE t Of S 8) Site Development F pan indicating: No. of Copies 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ts---- (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension c 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area 0/ (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation 21Y- (e) Outdoor common areas (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site s---- (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site t� 6. _Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities e� 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques pi 10. The location of mailboxes p� 11. The location of all structures and their orientation o/ 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements a-- C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1 h The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines al----- (b) Slope ratios t� (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) s� (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/UST PAGE Z OF 5 a. Water Supply: VALL*:=1 The 75 -�ti, Water District - Phone:(503) 2` - z511 provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. App 1(cite m i t Net �b r�w� opt-s t Fe Sk' s 741.,-- as vt Re Je A. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineering Department Section • 65 percent of the phospht , contained in 100 percent of the arm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) onstrufion of an on-site er q lity fa ( ymett of the fee-in- 'eu.(PCAKI 910.4A■C- 6,44S4C‘1/4( 04A-- Ag 154.M.467 PAVel) l TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. 14y --UF- /i.lc 51-16:;. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section NOTE: Jf an Engineering Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Department. Building Department Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: ■� (47 �.� ENGINEERING DE•ARTMENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 h\login\patty\preapp eng (Master section preapp-r mst) December 23, 1996 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Department Section 1,0•5- associates, inc. August 28, 1997 Ms Julia Hajduk City of Tigard 13125 Southwest Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Target Building Expansion 9009 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR SLS Project # 97-1253 Dear Julia: As we discussed, I am submitting five copies of the proposed Target Store Building Addition Site Plan for your review, and in preparation for the pre-application meeting September 9, 1997. Target is proposing to split the proposed work into two phases. The first phase would involve construction of the building addition and necessary site improvements to accommodate the new building area. Secondly, Target's plans to remodel the entire store interior to include new fixtures, wider aisles, new lighting and an updated layout, which is more similar to Target stores built today. Please review the enclosed and let me know if you have any questions, comments or if any further information is needed. Best regards, Chris Long Project Manager CML/vw Enclosures cc: Mr. Jim Tucker j:\97-1253\correspo\hajduk.doc WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA IRVINE, CALIFORNIA ENGINEERING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 • Walnut Creek • California 94596 510.943.5225 Fax 510.943.5718 fin"' VCn5 ;tSq/ PC VCS r 4 5 11 L.Wij /V42 '91Vr ''emir ,7 SEP 18 '97 04:44PM SLS ""SOCIPIES P.1/1 a 510 associates, inc, Memorandum Date: September 18, 1997 To: Mr. Jim Tucker, Target Ms Julie Hadjuk, City of Tigard Mr. Brian Roger, City of Tigard From: Chris Long Ref: Meeting Held at City of Tigard, September 9, 1997 Target #345 Tigard, OR SLS Project #:97-1253 The following are my notes from the above referenced meeting. Please let me know if you have any comments or questions. Jim described the proposed expansion and remodel of the Target store. Julia noted that a Neighborhood Meeting must be held. Residents within 250 feet of the site will be invited to attend. A 14-day notice period is required for the meeting. Julia and Brian noted that the proposed expansion does not pose any issues except possible impacts to Hall Road (State Road), although that is very unlikely. ODOT will comment on the application. The time frame for application review and approval is 10 to 12 weeks. It usually takes 6- 8 weeks for staff to issue a decision from date application is deemed complete. At that time, the Building Permit package can be submitted, with a letter acknowledging the risk that an appeal of the planning decision might be filed. The appeal period is 10 days following staff decision. Julia noted that parking for the Target site is adequate but suggested we verify that no reciprocal parking agreements exist. We should contact the East CIT (4 people) to inform them of the expansion proposal. Julia will give us the contact information. cc: Mr. Mike Klein, Target Mr. Joseph Smart, MBH Architects • J:\97.1253\CORRESPO\MTGNTE.DOC WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA IRVINE, CALIFORNIA ENGINEERING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 925 Ygnacio Valley Rood, Sulte 233 • Walnut Creek • Callfornlo 94596 510-943.5225 Fax 510•943•5718 • • H • J FtL�k W• LL 17x#0 r wgi MAL cEnA,f K 11tVAA.aNK J,?N V 1Q181, to I.f111Y mow MCA TNrtij jet, 1.414 7 TOW P MOO�R 1� a •,Itll 11Iia 11116, 124111 V / • i J ��p(y/��11��ypp / . rwla�awaO �� I 'M pt�'UP K+110 PMwN'.M N�O:Wti / h �� , FP _ 1.pll►01 100(qR, / 6, + !��. L�'yI I tr,[0:, 9i , ,� • 1 .�141M:STALL il.lpfiYB Q r I OOVALT. C 0' / P l:1 R y 1 - - A I ' �„01 asc PAJD01 0 1N } o _ 6A6 EXPANSION ,I u 1 .• , ,,' aoa W C Vi i 1.3100 v.+nc.I1 MMt ..19/,,0{0 if O• Y� O P P.11a MIE0110 u1» 344/1p00 sr I ✓ • or I (,� I I TARGET II� oi� �/ w1... • , -,4 e I 101,614 9P.(D �� • lEaAT Pr cn r'� •fi a ' a LLJ / illilliilliii:iiiiliiii f'' �� I o / � - W F7cP � b \\. a ' ∎• _ Ll I l ll II \ I�� ° Z .44JjHhIH1I � Nll � fl �'1I1 �~� ��•••\ \��..,..\. \•,� ,�� ,f ,(p 1 Cf1 .1" IV. —: - 4;li ci,o,4_114iiiiiiiiilpt,, .:(...IM _ • � W a Is- aleMleak ''`' _ 1 1 I •U 1 I.LLI.Ll11.�.1,�,la.l.,�.L. <<.. .I,I,�1'I', I .. . .. . .. ,. ... is I—a t i.in atirome 9 W. PFAFFI.B ..- `� Rift- U A 0■i! . . � • Q 0 I IIIMANALYINI y 22261112-22 "��7 Z I �MEZZANINE:NE: 103614 I '1 '1 F7OSDNG TARGET ST 1,614 i 1DL.IR g OBAP8IC BC117 on022612 2LIUMn ARF'A. iwaa�. III' Syr E wear' a 101,614 33}64 W 6 1 1\ PROPOSED TARGET DPANS10N: 16.316 3 " � �V z///// e„'1I IG72L 13222 01 • A A A -, wuw, / ` - ..11.61QILgE� , fARKt n ��INNN��I�� mac „� Q ,DTI Cr nIOARD PARKING REp3RE18)R& / R MAINZ *66y+nI ji' PARRM6 VDU STANDARDS Q r / 1 + ' r�.ti h7 II��i 0 STANDARD _ r NMDICAPP C�1K w/6.AISLE 4/14 ,. /PPAW O WOWS e311 /OJT /+/.:Iff U PROPOSED AMM40: 4437 /0 --�/ A dI �� •C li STANDARLD , -,r -j� Y. -� I - COIPACO 146 ,�P I4- nNANDIOM 10 �. 1044 '..I! 1 EmTI46 PARKING RATIR 4.76/1.000 9F .' /�.�• ' - _IL u�ll� O PROPOSED PARKING RAT/01 3.04/1.000 SF / 4b• a,� Gt' ^ : :J :1, !I.( O OTARGET . a� arr 290.57 FF. II II It I • f.P71•1.n • - i 1 . • L� `� \� `.. �� 1�� 4 :Oil i , ': "`�tat.. = J'/ f I ■ I foF w .n ,- � K- i . ��/1i•` !A►• 1 Sr ria:saam 4 4 1 � _ ! W11�� -N 0morE - „. - .... Aire A d i 2f li i ats co f$ -_,--3333.�•_,,�:-_-7- ..r=q� ar, y 0 i<;. mean.�� -••�CURVE DATA 4 / ■ CUM wpa UM., mu oao 151201 i� �ir } 2-1 712E !M!: 47VJ3K 110 6 t IMI 1 ' '\140):‘, i 9•• w PFAFFlE 6 i 6'i'`. L , F 1 .1 1 ■ $ $ — 1 •V r ti 40....5 88i a A 1 R 44:`° t�'° `► :_ x .� !r 1/1,/-1- r !r weer • r '' f __ S. !r • _1 I K '1'-I ; :n1 0 I. r. ..:.:::::::...:.:::.::.:.::::.:::,,,,::.:..:::.:.::::::.:41:::s.:.::.::...:.::.:::.::'::.:.::..:.:.:,::."•:.:::::.:.::::::::::-... 1:• t 1 N i ' n [.. :.::-:::::::.:::::::.:: ::'::::'......:'.:,:.:.::. N —' D m � Z 1 ill Ill T f 111 f % . '1:4 lk ' —I .; . ishn *4111%.::,,::.:./....',., . ,Iiii:.1 Q .. Iii, LA, ii . \w�� —.b. — ' fr .:.a�'s•'`g '►--.Ir.-..".-- \- . 9 4A r w P S. a . r N. • Ns r a r r ai IL. * "E E ?ri I t 1 ' • i 1 I ‘.44,\, tk "« , !,$1 13 ' !: 1! 1, 1,,, A 1 1 ; i ! 1 ! ? ' ` " i i ii iii i ! �! ` R 41114 ° C-2 GRADING PLAN M" „-�r, w M ' associates, inc. P.. 0 TARDET T-848 ,m'ROAM vµicT m 91.11E 2.14 rN.1u,MEM u ODOR SW HALL BOULEVARD 610-00-57.16 rut sio.w-cna . x7-1263 1+0/PD (IAGuAMA9 COUNTY OREOON e.,mw° "*"`"°°.`"'"'" ".I lei • Z MINI . j4004 � \.. _ Anil . I I I.16„,r,� ;J•_ _" 31i ,� • _ vvAvo Q��r ii wags SCAM Y E n In g --,cz o5 1 O �� o 16 MI 11 1 .o..uww . ,..1 ••••••a W4..N4LwwNi.uaN1I4.M.I /" +04111i) ./lO.�1 4.921tRL1iQ1 1��1M.wR1'..I.91YmwW I �_ X►. roN k1A l?.R1 a.w•ww•uoawwa.wlwrlw.a.o ''' ,i a. 1J .YlLw•,MIINNwYMI / wnwwsa - '...{„....? 1 Iii Q b'1 0 O AIM wlA`7lfiflGif' 1nwmwnu••mlrouswlal / ..,,. lc wow= WV AMAMB .01110.90.116411,01111-.OM ��■ Aliffeffie M.mlE a•wrmoOMOX/PweNSwuw ..: � •T. T..] 1 IMI FRIG i�/t� +IaR.A11NaL IOW U1.1' +.awem4447aw1w0.en + nrww VIM iA,I ...•wwe4slw.wcw,...... ,� LII1T� 1 ...1..cw•.NOmrwwa.. �... 1.1X110.111.1•01.11/04/00,01,OM - 1 *NW MYNA MINIM 10�tl•1.l.Aa.•Ja04f.1W1. + . 1I I I1A 4yF3 il .003_.1.110.,., ... q f'�OCt AAA 14-.r.....:.4.-Li.' ++3Y Inoomiewa kF"�,_- _ O ..1AUGR0ww0•w.1a.1M11• ._ _ _ 1,1101.1•. ..•1A •nu..wawwnuwm.lal•II �. F� NCB ftAN y4.vw..amw�vwv.r•a it J. JA1 s L • SECTION 26 TIS RIW W.M. IS 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON �. `.40\ SCALE I"=2Od 0`. ,, • " '" S 1 0 0,1701,,1 02X 02,1 0 e4• IOOGI701,1704.503,1 / 1104,15 ,1150L104lI • 1104,ISOQPJ04RN1f,nl •ry' 1102,1402,10,1106.11 + 4" SEE MAP 1400.soo,ro0.�.90 1200 °< ^ IS 1 268 w:,nox,nos,lros,l '� I i7 / = Zet Ac.. Z 1602.111)•4101,1401,ITC t i el" a 0 1 SEE MAP •yl. 4 // / . 4,, ISI268C ^ . / 0/ . X3445 REMAINDER ON "`>• _ AP ISI 26BC "P/'2 0Q/ f / G 41 x*a6. // j _w C.S. 8030 i' = `, u 3! a 1100 " EASEMENT 98.4358 LIJAe ..-z.,...,..:• rl e /t I _ _ ' \ — r 130 g-- It / "� ,, r 23-64 i-1/ - 23-77 r.aa.1303 "zllsy`IUN 1 i /.x a1. s • MI t.. j 1 1 f � 4 z.JP Ae. �..,'�. +00 /80'/ I 64.8 s 1302 y 'Y; La(+so 1.13011 ; J.83Ae. eS; 1 p8 o ;it go r� 40*A•I / ,w I: e p 124.625° n • 213.06 n f�; IN �6 A °•^ • , r Q i'en P.T. °` °• 1 163.31 4 n C No 1557P 225 °1 �I 1 i -1.77".. .-4.92 .I II' z u \�' ,MOST wiv. N.W. 1• ;, 401 100 t. • ao'I / I I CON Ov 3TC,n: ��' o J..:.Ae. J.atAe. /it: -K�I.,�'-TI 1403 8�I 4s5 tii 44 z 401-A! •2°y.. (r/ b 1 �r� C.S.9229 �A No Isz s u- s6�oa $a7•r'3s�E ' 1.1 C.S.9033 � 1 k I ?II �a.4aAa bl5 xNg I 1rr Ioo Q -21 Imo{ -swat[-JI I "—�"'S� 1p 6' I I I 2. ..3.7-r4. W Q 402 200 / \ p I p1 1107 15! J.J4A.. 7 J.00 Al / I `I 1 C.S. 8277 wl s 1 • 30.06Ae. $ 1 I LSf lz.: .S. -I n 1 O. R.15W n ' • W N 71.95 170' Spa1'E 2M 8!' 2r7.2i_ 1 1 f 300 • 287,48 N �I�� -r---zso' i J+n \ 1163!«^W iTi.rt^ JI I I IYI� 2A00 a .NAe.— - /-1-569•45.9 .�off_' , rte' I I 't �.Jrx. � >` :^- -• - - 1 di 2es.�7 I I - 1• 153 1_• . 1 301 V /, a .. I61.l� J p ° 1 :1:4•see xE� • �° 1 �� S� � Yar.71 '. � .° / A.- t — �4 iv 1.40 Ac.... / I ,� 5611. 3 58.80 2369 \ N1 —•4. `e 51-88 _ 1—.-� �-^� • i 434 6 147 C.S. 0074 • . Z. 0 00 O'1 ¢ 1 109 / I 0 led 130 21 R1G , _351.23 a 6••05'6 , / `` -J.OJ Aa- 1 4— J p = i 1 Initial PDir I/ 'SYE�//y20 4.0. - 45394/ .11 -- I= ; T w / r ' p' CEDARBci0 16138 • 4+!470 P.T. m `` t. I I. —_. I J Tai &2 I _374 —• .— _ _ '. Jam- —-' jj / I r( • •• I - k t 5: " • r MILA b 1S D{DY.�,T1ta {- . i i• .1 40, i.e....a:0.mo. PROPOSED M{ LP �c fAA: 1 = y'`; SHOPS / LAMONTS . ..`..._3 1 47-...) � _ z ► _ 1 yI - : .t:: :•e I W ii, wore WKS-anes•ha • _ � n -TAROET SHOPS LAMONT$ r _ ' • -- - zw '4. I PARKING SPACE.. $0• ' 128 1s• W H. i .__.:.:_.._ .. _ - 4d ' I S II I + WILDING ARIA w1.7ao i1L s1•. /1,N{ I . .. .... /' ,/�/�� (t--✓�►� =I.1 _ . e.at,e.i ETAIIS/ 1.000 EP.wIIONO AREA E.OQ E.Oi {11 W I /I / 4 - _ 1 1� • it, se oa a e APPROXIMATE PMLS a3 3.3 Ao i !/b s�4.1 yI I e•4•11 cs' •- -- gat ai g;—gi ti r �t at: .; $ g - -. _ 3 t T•aaaT••nior.IOW - a _. -_'�---`�~ •IItlpM..tr g Kal�V6 lri i I v l. Atterief* EXHIBIT: X.re.m • .r.«1.re j ,..--...1 L D G r .• • i S . / /e 444 0 " ' : ¢ _' a '`-J r.1.1 E Ord- • �■ i j=14-88 FAR r \ • .6.,,,,-.. ri' ' 1! U Z Y' ■_= • ! r g die' S O t Y Arir _r <t ® - , e 'KS-'Kest1,04r -• .1.-=,.. — ® �.� _ r •V V. • �LI: f.. di i liltltlt {�� •I � 4 v Z it F _ •1 .. . .. . . — I � . t r -.-.- .... .: . ...:_ 2.-_-:„.:::,;:::_•......_-.-:: ...- . . . . i roe lir BWMATAW �� e a S 3 r r E L E AC`� , =.�■ ¢ ._..-. ..• ., T M a.a • av u. Y (J ✓ \ + — • • • r-tw Z O_ !J •••••.Tra.. : 7 r _ ••rT•acan cw.c n.• - .. • p•/ _ - i + .( e I L t St• •tO. I /.4Ma1a a +'aA• • aae v I• - 1 . ( t MM ISa••••) .L-0 III FA. 4 1 POI/,, . o•T•g.a PIS VI! 0 II— — • oer �— i ! I = ' I 0 - P + z � Z- Ira WASHINGTON • ` • 4 1.: ai w a■1 •• m w (gu SQUARE JJ' ..1 _ • .rOa ..MOf• - DRIVE N M .` NA--wTw•c� ! -S a " TARGET S= • j all,am IMO • .a i' — ' L A N O N T S T=■ o -r.er••_ MUM IL w.�/. ..a • w•_ '+ / T•e I _ a- i • ot — • N. • .SAM. • i $• SHOPS _ �''e' °�'" [. ..� LA6AONT8 —e i� 'Y� RAN 10 ww SQUARE —" • ` I !■ •7■ �I� •••wr•rrsaaar.ow ►.rw C '� w g� _on .+u+nom A. .� - a•rw to 4417 w 1••••• a" DRIVE II ~ . E- e _ — • •t•1. ey a 0 + an. ..nr»aoe� • • — •— I 9 _. • Q .1 T4 aaac rw.TnA..•no. •I a — • -.. r .A•..ortT. ►t_Aw. _ _ i + I T;11::: a 1��'[r—/_— ME 1/'w UMW• . 0 n T,co.w•eT•i u DTI+..ari a ( raa"�1'- � �i . Ow t'um. 3 (tg)•t'OA. rs)• •+a,. .6uTIfifaA. I t'lu na►.— MdM�eM I. .ii 111111111 0IIIiHiHIJTIII :' I�III— 1 • • a1111.001 I, . . ■ /e7 - ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS NOTE TO FILE A condition of approval for SDR 97-0015 was to confirm that the site would retain 15% landscaping. It was later brought to staff's attention that the site only had about 13% landscaping. Because the development is so large, adding another 2% landscaping would have been several thousand square feet. Staff determined that the intent was to not decrease the amount of landscaping prior to the expansion. Because this was the intent, if the applicant submitted verification that the landscaping would not be reduced below the existing landscaping, the condition would be satisfied. The applicant submitted a letter that indicated the amount of landscaping will actually be increased by 125 square feet after the expansion is complete, therefore condition number 1.A is satisfied. CITY OF TIGARD D1EVELOPMENoT SERVICES Zoning. . . . , kemarkss Site and gr ,. . . . is letter is to confirm rec e :- ;,$ ion which has been forwarded to tt ? r a reminder, the associate land use case ts) _ _I ._5.�1� -_ ''lease be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of Ae case ts) and ,lust submit plans directly to the are .n ; _4 . - 4' n" .ndicated on your final order. Your building plans ARE NOT { You must satisfy the land us- r....; _ , = ; ,,:�..: • .:;- - permit plans review process. the building plans review process,. has been cuta,t. , . U .; , u; - .. .. ,,;. ;; { building permit will NOT be issued without appr. ,,gym the engineering a ... - - epar•tments. y ;.ru rnave any questions regarding this notice, piee41 tiUr{La«L a+► uir t�� .E y 39- 4171 for further clarification. RECEIVED PLANNING associates, inc. FEB 2 0 1998 CITY OF TIGARD February 19, 1998 RECEIVED PLANNING Julia Hadj uk DA Community Development Department FEB 1998 City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Target T-345 Tigard, OR SLS No. 97-1253 Dear Ms. Hadjuk, This is to confirm that the proposed landscape area is as for the Target store site is greater or equal to the existing landscape area. The project currently has 47,700 SF of landscape area. The proposed landscape area will amount to 47,825 SF. I have attached a reduced copy of the site plan to show where additional landscape area has been added to the project. If you should have any questions please give me a call. Very truly yours, V Gregory P. Friel SLS associates, inc. f:\clerical\97-1253\correspo\lsarea doc ENGINEERING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 925 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 233 • Walnut Creek • California 94596 510.943.5225 Fax 510.943.5718 IL. APR 4:i2 '98 11;23-7 MILLER'S •'al ANir4R le Ax CF., ,N .... A N S M I DAr : S S ../ o N ------,,,.:_:------,,,.:_: 7-"s , To FA N c nk, Q M$�. 1 .y'"''�o � t FAX NUMS E 64ERA 3�3462 M F s SAARNF�T PS og�EM- RY lip ME AsF. AT <50 ANSMTTT r 6�e1 ASE CALL yam. kl( E- ,43 Op -AGEs: Po BoX?�r ncLuDrNG co ' ER s SEAVFRroN �� AEET) EGON si'fl7s 0,217 • (603,)644-6/6/ APP ©2 '98 11:23AM f 1ILLEP'S P. Date : tear Sirs , We have reviewed your plan and/or attachments for the proposed �1 f1 development at __Ca ,.�.. _..sj() 7 11'1T � l �C% • 1 Y� ��? iztt. and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions : Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these materials for our review. MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC. 66641C_ e_ vic1717 • ,