Loading...
SDR1998-00004 SDR98 -00004 METZGER BUILDING NOTICE OF DECISION ,I SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0004 CITY TIGARD Community Development METZGER BUILDING Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 6/27/98 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: METZGER BUILDING CASE: Site Development Review SDR 98-0004 PROPOSAL: Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: David Metzger Nicoli Engineering PO Box 275 9025 SW Center Street Sherwood, OR 97140 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial; I-L. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 12 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1 . Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permits, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the storm drain line tap and water line work in SW Durham Road. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permits, the applicant shall take the necessary steps to place the existing public sanitary line work that was completed for this site by the applicant, onto a one (1)-year maintenance period. The applicant will need to work with the Engineering Department to clarify what steps should be taken. 4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 5. If the applicant wishes to pursue a "buried pipe trench" infiltration facility to meet the water quality requirement, shall be submitted to the for Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review, a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer which analyzes the soil on the site and whether or not the soil is suitable for an infiltration facility. 6. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea, (639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. the minimum 25% landscape area or a plan that satisfies the criteria of Section 18.68.050.A.6 to allow a reduction to this percentage; B. location of all roof mounted equipment and an elevation demonstrating screening in compliance with Section 18.120.108.4(B); C. three (3) disabled parking spaces; D. four (4) bicycle parking spaces at a location within 50 feet of primary entrances to the structure; and E. written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 12 7. A lighting plan shall be submitted to be reviewed and approved by the Tigard Police Department. Staff Contact: Jim Wolf (639-6168 x220). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Durham Road underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $6,600. 9. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plans. 10. Before the City authorizes use of the buildings on the site for any purpose or changes in the approved uses of the buildings on the site, the applicant shall show that the site contains adequate off-street parking for the proposed uses in combination with other existing uses on the site, consistent with CDC Section 18.106. The applicant shall also demonstrate that the proposed tenant is classified as a permitted use. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The subject property received a Site Permit (SIT 92-0008) in 1992. In 1993, another Grading Permit (SIT 93-0011) was granted to allow the owner to import approximately 8,000 cubic yards of structural fill. No other development applications were found to have been previously filed with the City for this site. Vicinity Information: Adjacent properties to the east, south and west are zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and are developed with two (2) single-family residences. Property on the north side of SW Durham Road is zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) and is developed with single- family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The approximately 65,336 square foot parcel is vacant and covered with grasses and several trees. There has been some structural fill placed on the property over the past couple of years. The applicant is proposing to construct a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ARE INDICATED IN THIS SECTION IN THE "BOLD" PRINT FOLLOWED BY A REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE AND FINDINGS, IF ANY, BY STAFF. NOTICE CF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 12 Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code (CDC) requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure fee that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street systems. Upon obtaining a building permit, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $20,723 (industrial/warehouse). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $64,759 ($20,723 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial system. Since the TIF paid is $20,723; the unmitigated impact can be valued at approximately $44,036 impact on the collector and arterial systems. Southwest Durham Road has been fully improved and, therefore, no additional right-of-way dedications or street improvements are necessary or required for this project. Since there are no dedications or street improvements, any other required public improvements will meet the rough proportionality test since the unmitigated impacts are an estimated $44,036. Use Classification: The applicant's narrative states that the use of the structure is unknown at this time. Sheet 2.1 of the preliminary plan submittal package shows the floor plans provide for warehouse and manufacturing space. Section 18.68.030 lists manufacturing and wholesale, storage and distribution as permitted uses in the I-P zone. Future tenants of this industrial park will have to comply with the permitted uses listed for this zone. The applicant has been conditioned that, prior to occupancy, each of the tenants for the potential spaces shall be reviewed by the Planning Division for compliance with parking standards. Review of the proposed tenant in regard to the permitted use status shall be reviewed at that time for compliance with this standard by the Planning Division. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.68.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 25% of the site area, except that a reduction to 20% of the site may be approved through the development review process when all of the following performance standards are met: Ai) Street trees to be installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than the two (2) inches required; Aii) the landscaping between a parking lot and the street property line shall have a minimum width of 10 feet; Aiii) all applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied; B) the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 12 landscape area. The site has an average lot width of approximately 234 feet, thereby, exceeding the required 50-foot minimum lot width requirement. The applicant is proposing approximately 14,404 square feet or 22% of the site for landscaping. The landscape plan shows that the Chanticleer Flowering Peer street trees are planted with a minimum caliper of three (3) inches, while it is not clear as to the size of the proposed Goldenchain tree. The landscaping between the parking lot and the street property line is only five (5) feet. Buffering and screening has been provided in accordance with buffering standards. The plans do not show that all of the criteria have been satisfied to allow less than the minimum 25% landscape requirement. A revised plan shall be submitted that either provides the minimum 25% landscape area or satisfies the criteria to allow a reduction to this percentage. Setbacks: Section 18.68.050 states that the front yard setback shall be a minimum of 35 feet and that no side or rear yard setback is required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum building heights is 45 feet. As indicated on the plans, the front yard setback is at least 70 feet, well in excess of the minimum 35-foot setback. Side and rear yard setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing a building height of 25 feet, under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions) or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures), which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180 7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year Floodplain) or 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Over the years, the property has had fill transported onto the property to create the existing conditions. There is no topography and natural drainage areas in need of preservation. All but two (2) of the existing trees on the site will be preserved. The proposed plan also includes new parking lot and street trees. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This proposal abuts a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 12 (Code Section 18.100.13u). Buffering and Screening will be provided in accordance with the requirements of that section, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The site plan only indicates that the parking and storage areas will be screened from adjoining properties. The applicant shall submit a revised plan that shows the location of all roof mounted equipment and an elevation demonstrating screening in compliance with this section. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. A lighting plan showing that lighting fixtures are selected, designed and situated to direct light towards areas of the site vulnerable to crime shall be submitted in accordance with this section. The plan shall be reviewed by the City of Tigard Police Department. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The landscape plan shows the provision of Chanticleer Flowering Peer and Goldenchain trees along SW Durham Road, in accordance with this section. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, screening has been provided in accordance with this section. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a proposed commercial or industrial park use abuts a single- family use, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. Section 18.100.080.D contains the minimum improvement standards for the buffering area. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1) At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall be not less than 10 feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2) In addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 12 Section 18.100.080.E states that where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering; 1) a hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs which will form a 4 foot continuous screen within 2 years of planting, or; 2) an earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials which will form a continuous screen 6 feet in height within 2 years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover or bark mulch, or; 3) a 5 foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. There are existing residences on both the adjoining eastern and western properties. The residence to the east is approximately 400 feet from the property line close to SW Durham Road and the residence to the west is adjacent to the property line and also close to SW Durham Road. Therefore, a 20-foot buffer and screening area is required along these property lines. The western 20-foot buffer area contains approximately 6,240 square feet. Therefore, the buffer shall contain 60, five-gallon; or 120, one-gallon shrubs in addition to the one (1) row of trees. The eastern 20-foot buffer area contains approximately 4,880 square feet. Therefore, the buffer shall contain 40, five-gallon; or 80, one-gallon shrubs in addition to the one (1) row of trees. The proposed plan shows that a 14-foot setback and buffer has been provided along both the east and the west property lines. The plan also shows an existing row of Sequoia trees along the entire length of both the east and west property line. 'n addition, 31 five (5)-gallon rhododendron shrubs and 38 five (5)-gallon rhododendron shruos have been planted along the east and west buffer area respectively. Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.100.070.0 states that in-lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the typical buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening required by this code. Given the locations of the existing residences and the screening provided by the mature, existing Sequoia trees, the proposed plan affords the same degree of buffering that would be achieved if a 20-foot buffer and new landscaping were to be installed, thereby, satisfying this standard. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, vision clearance criteria have been satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(D)(2) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per 1000 square feet gross floor area within warehouse (plus 1 space per 700 square feet of patron serving area and 1 space per 200 square feet of office area) for Wholesaling, storage, and distribution. The 21,000 square foot warehouse building would require 21 parking spaces if used as a warehouse. As indicated on the site plan, 61 parking spaces have been provided. Since it is unclear as to the uses of the building, a condition of approval is warranted to facilitate compliance with CDC Section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 12 18.106 and to avoid creating any mis-impression that the amount of parking proposed is adequate for all uses or combinations of uses on the site. When specific uses are proposed for the site, the amount of off-street parking provided on the site should be re-evaluated to determine whether off-street parking will be adequate for the proposed use(s) in combination with other use(s) on the site. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 3 disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. The plan shows the provision of two (2) disabled parking spaces. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides one (1) additional disabled parking space, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures. Where possible, bicycle parking facilities shall be placed under cover. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Four (4) bicycle parking spaces are required for this development. The plan shows that three (3) bicycle parking spaces are provided. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides four (4) bicycle parking spaces at a location within 50 feet of primary entrances to structure, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Off-Street Loading spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The plan shows the provision of an off-street loading space, in accordance with this section. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This criteria is satisfied as the proposed plan shows the provision of a 40-foot-wide driveway onto SW Durham Road. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The proposed site plan shows the provision of a four (4)-foot walkway that provides a connection from the entrance to the sidewalk along SW Durham Road, thereby, satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 12 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans show the provision of a trash enclosure. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the location and compatibility of this facility. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant will be removing two (2) trees less than 12 inches in caliper, therefore, no mitigation will be required. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 1 8.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road, which is classified as an arterial street between SW Hall Boulevard and SW 72nd Avenue on the City's Transportation Plan Map. Durham Road was recently fully improved as a part of a joint Washington County/ODOT project. Sidewalks were also installed as a part of that project, as well as a driveway apron to this site. The applicant's plan indicates that they will use the existing driveway apron for access. No other right-of-way dedications or street improvements are necessary or required for this project. WATER: There is an existing public water line in SW Durham Road that is available to serve this site. There is an existing stubout to the site intended for fire hydrant support. The plan also shows a new water meter will be installed to serve the new building. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 79th Avenue that was extended by the applicant across Durham Road to serve this site at the same time the roadway improvements were constructed. However, the new public sewer line work has not been placed onto a one-year maintenance period. In order to place the work onto a one-year maintenance period, the applicant will need to submit a maintenance bond on Cite forms. Prior to connecting to the lateral stubbed out to this site, the applicant will need to contact the Engineering Department and work toward placing the public sewer work mentioned above onto a one-year maintenance period. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 12 STORM DRAINAGE: The topography of this site falls primarily to the east. The applicant's plan indicates that they will route the surface water from this site toward the northeast corner where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility before discharging into the existing 15-inch public storm drainage line in SW Durham Road. Calculations were submitted by the applicant which show that the existing 15-inch line has adequate capacity to handle the additional storm water runoff that will be generated from this project. Therefore, no on-site detention is necessary. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65% of the phosphorus contained in 100% of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant's plans indicate they will propose a "buried pipe trench" as the on-site water quality facility. Staff has spoken with the applicant's engineer regarding this type of system and that, in general, they do not work well in Tigard due to the high amounts of clay in the soil. If the applicant wishes to pursue this type of infiltration system, they will need to submit additional evidence from a qualified geotechnical engineer indicating the soil is suitable for an infiltration system. The geotechnical report and water quality calculations will need to be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines on SW Durham Road adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 240 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $6,600. SECTION V. STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and has the following comments: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 12 1 . SIT 93-0011 has expired. The fill over the site must meet grading and fill requirements of OSSC Appendix 33; 2. every portion of exterior walls must be within 150 feet of a fire access road. Provide a clear 20-foot-wide access road around the building; 3. every required exit shall have a landing connected to an accessible route to the public way, out of the traffic lane around the building; 4. the storm system does not meet the requirements of the OSSC section 11 . An engineered system must be provided; and 5. the building shall be protected by an automatic fire suppression system. Provide a F.D.C. within 70 feet of fire hydrant. F.D.C. cannot pressurize the fire hydrants. The City of Tigard Water Department states that although they have no objections to the project, we will require that the double check valve assembly be replaced with a detector double check valve assembly. Also, since water demands have not been established, please contact Water Division for appropriate sizing of water service. We also require, as a minimum, a double check valve assembly (backflow protection) device on the property side of the meter. The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the application and has the following comments: Sanitary Sewer: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. Storm Sewer: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity tc convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating flow. Water Quality: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. Sensitive Area: A "Sensitive Area" exists. Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. GTE states that the developer/owner will be required to provide a 4-inch PVC to GTE specifications at a GTE designated location. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 12 PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY APRIL 22, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON APRIL 22, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . APRIL 9, 1998 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Associate Planner/AICP d � � �-� ''� April 9. 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers.orff DATE Planning Manager i:`.curpin\will\sdr98-04.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 12 .N4 ..■... ....... '141 3 f i • 444 li i 41 it ii 4-. if. I ....- -.... 11., - Pun..0 OC•la.R Z MORINO VoRM LDS 7 Mama•1>GM Or Illt• 0 0•14741 LA ...... IIK AArr c.•••••••••• -*"... CI••••. Ci) ACCILIMI PATA---4 11•14101 41/••■•0■Clo •...,. -.--- --- - ...2 nc. . .,.0. 4 C,CLI % A o. litai.i11111%144 ...... -..,„ • > . .111111111111111) . 1'ti••ii•2.1,i l V_.,__.•_-c uG_m_. ;',1?...6 4•••..4 i AI I k. .4 ll .. v A■•••I•I•I Il:•i■:l.•—IL A te t. b i .a..".1 I 7 •M O41W4•N1•,1 a 96 V "0'i • • : ' Z IOD ,... ..■----tr•cs:j•eu egemasocaonanivoomaliGaim .. ciarearemag .9----..--.0•••••■••••• ... 1•1111111•11P IP 1.7 r .. •. AC PAM TO < SCUT.OM OP ,---Locaerrso •••111 MILD.. AMA 1.4/41 CMG.• ........-•-•-..=1/1•0 MU=a. fig ',ELM V 1•••01101 MO 04•40•01011 1 • LOC••■•••0440 Mt LAO V/ OFFICE/WAREHOUSE MANUFACTURING ' ' of ft .1. (21000(21000 SQ.FTJ 2 ■ • k < „L..... ,...r_ -I OAC4.■■••••1 (41•11 4o 1-A•00r-o10---....., 464••• • 4 ..Li. Fa •• .” • .......-■:•■•••. . UM, V' --. , .4. 0•••••0 ram 0 ■40480.•••••••• ■ S NILO■d'Air WOW A. ■ WM-4W.. odUpimdl,L414.1 ■111. 11.04 v``• ••‘‘ r''''''''''a ''•'" .:'"• ''' • **A 1,100Cols•••••••---... t 0 Imo ; L, . › 1 . 1-0.11 Salm I C 0111 1 1.... -2. : OP a • O . k . . NIL ITVOINIT 4 • Cli)WAGE I'. ill i r.1 lor t••••Or I ••••■14•••• or., le ig i r T• •i• ... t • ,____O_WM*1 • 1111 igarliak k 111-•••F•d■ WORMED 14.4”.•••• pacmae w Cap,..” •■ --•-—N-------_-. CASE NOES]&CASE MAWS]: 97- • mmowl••■■•■•■•• •••••••••••••• SITE PLAN 1111111 SDR 98-0004 EXHIBIT MAP N i MIR MINITTIISCIUD t I - 1 1 I - I` pJ � T irrrii r• l --n 'f/ OEOORAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM II 8 911:11 .0 �� a VICINITY MAP_al ills .. .0 1 > aTTilb ____ _ a 0 et -- c, _______.....______ AS , • IN ■ ■Q I-- 1� g ■ �� 1 SR 98-0004 _�pp! ._ AI X MOM lim I.1 _� h Metzger Building . ■ 1 " z SIR 1 l re U _ pA ■ ' N ^- 1 1 w 4 —^F : 111 II i_ I 111 , mil 11111-1 I~ ap V-Mil mon III 1. DURHAM RD —. a i-P ~ cc ��~ti N� F �-r o too 200 300 400 500 Feel qM • ,•=378 real lib . � A ',. ��5 City of-Tigard �OO Information on Ibe map Is for general location only and 1. Q' should be verified with the Development Services DMabn. QQ� �(1 13125 SW Hall Blvd `J �j Tigard.OR 97223 yV` Q (503)639-4171 �- .-.-_--__--. ----._-- ----- -- ---- --- -- .-_ - __ �--. �_ Mip'/lwww.ol.11gard.or.ua Community Develo ment -- — — - h' P Plot date:Feb 27, 1998;c:lmagiclmagic0l.apr REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: April 7, 1998 TO: Will D'Andrea, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 98-0004, Metzger Building Description: The applicant is requesting SDR approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 sf office/warehouse/manufacturing building at 7800 SW Durham Road, (WCTM 2S1 13BA, Tax Lot 200. Findings: 1. Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road, which is classified as an arterial street between SW Hall Boulevard and SW 72nd Avenue on the City's Transportation Plan Map. Durham Road was recently fully improved as a part of a joint Washington County/ODOT project. Sidewalks were also installed as a part of that project, as well as a driveway apron to this site. The applicant's plan indicates that they will use the existing driveway apron for access. No other right-of-way dedications or street improvements are necessary or required for this project. 2. Water: There is an existing public water line in SW Durham Road that is available to serve this site. There is an existing stubout to the site intended for fire hydrant support. The plan also shows a new water meter will be installed to serve the new building. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 79th Avenue that was extended by the applicant across Durham Road to serve this site ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0004 Metzger Building PAGE 1 at the same time the roadway improvements were constructed. However, the new public sewer line work has not been placed onto a one-year maintenance period. In order to place the work onto a one-year maintenance period, the applicant will need to submit a maintenance bond on City forms. Prior to connecting to the lateral stubbed out to this site, the applicant will need to contact the Engineering Department and work toward placing the public sewer work mentioned above onto a one-year maintenance period. 4. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls primarily to the east. The applicant's plan indicates that they will route the surface water from this site toward the northeast corner where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility before discharging into the existing 15-inch public storm drainage line in SW Durham Road. Calculations were submitted by the applicant which show that the existing 15-inch line has adequate capacity to handle the additional storm water runoff that will be generated from this project. Therefore, no on-site detention is necessary. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant's plans indicate they will propose a "buried pipe trench" as the on-site water quality facility. Staff has spoken with the applicant's engineer regarding this type of system and that, in general, they do not work well in Tigard due to the high amounts of clay in the soil. If the applicant wishes to pursue this type of infiltration system, they will need to submit additional evidence from a qualified geotechnical engineer indicating the soil is suitable for an infiltration system. The geotechnical report and water quality calculations will need to be reviewed and ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0004 Metzger Building PAGE 2 approved by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines on SW Durham Road adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 240 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 6,600.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the storm drain line tap and water line work in SW Durham Road. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0004 Metzger Building PAGE 3 executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall take the necessary steps to place the existing public sanitary line work, that was completed for this site by the applicant, onto a one-year maintenance period. The applicant will need to work with the Engineering Department to clarify what steps should be taken. 4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 5. If the applicant wishes to pursue a "buried pipe trench" infiltration facility to meet the water quality requirement, they shall submit for Engineering Department review (Brian Rager) a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer which analyzes the soil on the site and whether or not the soil is suitable for an infiltration facility. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 6. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Durham Road underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 6,600.00. i:\eng\brianr\comments\sdr98-04.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0004 Metzger Building PAGE 4 Page 1 of 1 i ! . , 6 i L ,:i„......1111, _ ., „..... t ..„..o.a y1 aww. 9+,v,.M m. file://A:\MVC-018S.JPG 3/23/98 I UrA4 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 1998 TO: William D'Andrea, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA \„)'` SUBJECT: Metzger Building, SDR 98-0004 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists. Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96- 44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone:503/648-8621 Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 � FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY YOOFnTIIGARD Community Development Shaping A.Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:[503)639-4171 Fax:[5031 684-7291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)98-0004 ➢ METZGER BUILDING < The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (FRIDAY - MARCH 20,19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: '� E a (� �J U }998, mp 1 (Please provide the foffowitig information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(sl: 4,A - I SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 RECEIVED MAP 1 1998 TO: City of Durham City Manager !3Y. _ _ FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:15031639-4111 Fax:(5031684-1297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SUM 98-0004 ➢ METZGER BUILDING < The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (FRIDAY - MARCH 20,19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: tnr1 v h, (Please provide the following information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: Phone Numberfsl: I SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS �L 41) t oeA' c' " 0%) <° 4Il l REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping.Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 TO: John Roy,Property Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:15031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)98-0004 ➢ METZGER BUILDING < The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [FRIDAY - MARCH 20,19981 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V � (Please provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIiGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 TO: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)98-0004 ➢ METZGER BUILDING < The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [FRIDAY - MARCH 20,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V � (Please provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: c dal c 'Phone Number[sl: j..)..aa SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI of HOARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 ) TO: David Scott,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]98-0004 METZGER BUILDING The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [FRIDAY - MARCH 20,19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V S7f' .7 3 - 0011 ,4 A/ F/J1 C1t e , N / 7 77r 6 A c/tM, /q yid /l•!1 �^-1�jj h �v� rs�,.w d L Offs .4- 4 m i/h.4 3� (f� ✓fir p nr 7L1 , s� PX "�'irlr9r Cv� 1/i 7i, k/ p f..`tk /So 0-2- A F a ?riff rvu r./. .7P-ovide 4.. i l,. ,rr 10 ' LA, lee ot «e1/ rvae/ 4. . S ,a I I I, (2) (tie '1 r e, LA I e.( ' + /) A A /.1 4 1411 vii r} /t 2• rl r 7t e t) A 1 1■00u ∎ 31 • ro '1fc 'tv 10(i, �w11,r A,.P7 ) p" f ell 4-di V.-Aki• e ` f rt el'rnI4y, ../ f 11 teroot . 1'4 rt +ro✓' q•/In 610 P f . 7,�► r ] r-p)►. >y. on .r„1I 01 -4 f '( (l n t 71/o.t r/ . �d ry i r�- "-id t 41�, I-- G 1 IgkaSeprOVidetnefOr&Wing• onnnation)Name of Persons)Commenting: .I dl F I I Phone Number's]: SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS ^e foe. G« Il "V ter ' // 6 � �rvtPt f*.•/ Li 0.1 all" fom. e7L/[ ,t' pey,.r//'iI $ Syff4. ►. 0 ', if FD. ( . Ni.k "70 ' 01" A F. N i`1)L. l4nr vi" T W • . Z W cc S H Q) 3 toi 4r. fa. S w—_____ - - _ _ _ URHAMRDa_ D ,i2 - Z ` 1N T vKM \ \ CI) # `a 0 s '_ tE • 22�■.12 .221•2... 4 III� 2.•,Q'.b 4 b r4/, s • '°'"`" .■ • • r., Iii ...� } Z . iii.. -.:' ....... ! a q -9 E i Q Z• n� ��wr Q .[.1.21 IMO P ■VLO.. r+-VO.L./2C ',ELM Y O• re,Walla MX NO Mg LAW OFFICE/WAREHOUSE MANUFACTURING o (21,000 SQ.Eli 4 rt IC t; 1 Q ,wi•r•-. 2121.�• •aw=rte• i CD urorrry--l--y 1 ��ii V i 1 ■ ■ a.— - •e'.-----r_erm1 ^ LL 112222...2.1 4 ti• ..m.02.x.. , AMA 1•2412 WM t "Y �•' ; UNE U j ,224220 - 3 22� sy rr 322• .L -• w• .1 22 i r i1 1.l. i �r�(f� ' t 3 T 1• , . ,-; \_______SI \ 1 \ \ \ is 2.-I•De a ay. .1•19412 Cal••22•122 gaz.wawa 2.cto22222 22 ■ CASE NOM]a CASE KAMER SITE P IAN t 50898-0004 • EXHIBIT MAP N Metzger Building ■! , a�awrnaa� 4Iiu41 EHLiilri . - no O elm A s �� Q pd.jp, SDR 98-0004 ■ III A .l.- • .IR ' 1Metzger Building ■ ■ ' 1111' W I. Nom Q �1111■1 � � �: C) • :,111111 w fAll zmi111111 IL 1 _ I I__ _ 1 .W,--- -- 1 III- iI � ... ,._ v. T • 2 mli DURHAM RD it � O a cc ���� • o N s�p a4., O,Q 0 100 200 300 400 800 Feet i R•744, / 1�375 Mt lib . A T ,t1 a�5 City of Tigard OO Infamatlon on IMe map b for penal location only and V� shadd be vamiled with the Developmwi Senrkea OMsbn.Q 13125 SW�Bled JQ Tigard OR 97223 ' � Gv Mw 639-4171 Ixipl/www.d.9pard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Feb 27, 1998;c:lmagiclmagic0l.apr REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIO TIIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 TO: Elaine Self,GTE FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:[5031 639-4171 Fax:1503l 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]98-0004 METZGER BUILDING The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (FRIDAY - MARCH 20,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ,.> We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: . — f_A - 4° 21 A Ai • Ra AA _ _ F/ :" c; 0 �\ (Please provide the following information)Name of Person's)Commenting: - / / CL.c_-,A Q �- I Phone Number's): (o_ �q_ 7 3 vg 7 I SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENT? ..44.OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)98-0004 METZGER BUILDING The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (FRIDAY - MARCH 20,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (Please provide the foffowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: o I Phone Number(s): S—lo - 440k, I SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community RE DATE: March 10,1998 RMANNING TO: Michael Miller,0 � I s Water Department Manager MAMA X98 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: " iiinallrea,Associate Planner Pbsne:(5031639-4111 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0004 ➢ METZGER BUILDING < The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (FRIDAY - MARCH 20, 19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1-/A vC A/c) 0,6Jtc.noAJS 773 rZJE 2 )Ec r-; LIE i dr�� - /'Li m,-6. 777:417 u 1E (J E.E,k vewe ,Arse RL j 7),L T4 A- 'DETECT — �Crti�c� (i/EGL vAw6 677,uGE Dinvvos• ,4 1ve A%T 'fin/ F.Sr.� c/sH6y1� PG-E40-SC a.&/774-Cr L-1117671.— Di✓,sisal/ ,rf Atii/ZOP2,47E- /'LN4 0A-1✓4TE,-- gA72v,GE. RE`[- . ,CsA- M/.tr//n u,4 DaK6c.E CµE r.X— ti. wE A'S Enwe y (8ec ki L P0. - -rrn.) DEV r e.€ 6A3 -rat Ta-e>Pe(7.---1 5/DE D r %!.!-g ME7tr. v 10kase provide the foffowing information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: 47/�� /Lie-- Phone Number(sl: A j I SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIIGARD Community Development Shaping.4 Better Community DATE: March 10,1998 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea,Associate Planner Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031 664-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI98-0004 ➢ METZGER BUILDING The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [FRIDAY - MARCH 20,19981 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: I Phone Number's): I SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CrrAr118: [CI (Li()[vi CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS La Place tor revlew ■Mary CITBoek's) FILE NOLSI. 5.M. -0 ZI FILE NAME[S]: A i- . / CITY OFFICES ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,,i,nning sw.rvn.a COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Dm,....sue..Technician. _'POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,t,m.P■.V,rmor,orrr. BUILDING DIV./David Scott,s�wngonKy ‘,.--ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,ate,„Reese Engineer ✓WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,00..wr..M.,.g, _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,c,,y R.�aa. �' PERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Prro.rywr„ger, OTHER I SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE R' _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* keNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY • Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 f� , LOCALANDSTATEIURISDICTIONS - _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR. DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street, NE _Mike Matteucci,Nregrorhd.coon. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem, OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton, OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street, NE TY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,Green.paces Coordinator(CPA'vZOA'.) 1175 Court Street, NE PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) _WASHINGTON COUNTY King City, OR 97224 Building#16, Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera ODOT,REGION 1 * _ Brent Curtis,CPA's) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,Dv'Pmt.Rev.cooed. _ Scott King(cPAs) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _ Mike Borreson(Er,gr„eer) David Knowles, Planning Bureau Dir. Portland,OR 97209-4037 _ Jim Tice(loA's) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON, DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _ Tom Harry(Current Pi Ayes) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * _ Phil Healy(Current .) PI.App. Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97204 Jane Estes.Permit spec■aus, _ Sr.CartographericPAzcA-MS 10 PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES BURLINGTON NORTHERN/ SANTA FE R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS 4ORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _ICI CABLEVISION OF OR. Reed Fay, Division Supenntendent Jason Hewitt Brian Moore.Svc.Design Consultant Linda Peterson 1313`N. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 9480 SW Boeckman Road 3500 SW Bond Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place, S-6020 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97201 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Craig Eyestone /'NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Steve Myhr,Region Manager Michael Kiser,Project Planner 14200 SW Bngadoon Court Scott Palmer Catellus Property Management 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97005 220 NW Second Avenue 999 Third Avenue,Suite 2120 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Seattle,WA 98104-4037 _4 ENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Koft,Engineering _OREGON ELECTRIC RJR _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _US WEST COMMUNICATION MC: OR030546 (BUR(lNCTONNORFNFRN/SANFAFrRiRPRFOASSORI Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Pete Nelson Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Reed Fay, Division Superintendent 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 421 SW Oak Street 1313 W. 11th Street Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97204 Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 * - INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IF WITHIN 250' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANT'/All CITY PROJECTS. (PROJECT PLANNSR IS RESIOMSISLS TON INDICATING PANTIES TO NOTIFY hapatty■nasters\rtcnonce.mst 16-Jan•98 MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING '�`''` '`'' cm of TIGARD Community(Development Shaping,Better Community STATE, OAF OREGON- ) �VP County of Washington )ss. ,� y f � � `� City of Tigard ) �� I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Aooroonae Bees)Beb«1 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDK 61V-- — 1/jkT2 6�El_ 81111 L 1J 1A/6 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE / (FibNo 4ameReference) l� City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Fie No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: 7-; ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Dace d Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FOR: I 1 (Type/Kind of Notice) (He No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng,if appicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S1 of which is attached, marked Exhlhlt "A", wa_l pailed to eachApmed person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked FAIN " •n the day of &Cp/.� , 1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the • da of F.14I _ 1998, postage prepaid. CZ, rir,�l/ (Person tha -repared Notice • Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the // ,day of tick__ , 19 7 I °.'::—:,, OFFICIAL SEAL ' DIANE M JELDERKS (1 )A,, NOTARY PUBLIGoREGON /YU' � '4) ,�, COMMISSION NO.046142 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGO .., / ,, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 C� My Commission Expires: 9/7 Rt NOTICE OF DECISION adt SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0004 CITY OF IARD �G Community Development METZGER BUILDING Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 6/27/98 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: METZGER BUILDING CASE: Site Development Review SDR 98-0004 PROPOSAL: Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: David Metzger Nicoli Engineering PO Box 275 9025 SW Center Street Sherwood, OR 97140 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial; I-L. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 12 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL P►RIORf= H. THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OREWILONG PERMITS, TI FOLLOWING CONDITIONS-MALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permits, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the storm drain line tap and water line work in SW Durham Road. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permits, the applicant shall take the • necessary steps to place the existing public sanitary line work that was completed for this site by the applicant, onto a one (1)-year maintenance period. The applicant will need to work with the Engineering Department to clarify what steps should be taken. 4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 5. If the applicant wishes to pursue a "buried pipe trench" infiltration facility to meet the water quality requirement, shall be submitted to the for Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review, a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer which analyzes the soil on the site and whether or not the soil is suitable for an infiltration facility. • 6. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea, (639-4171). The revised plans shall include the following: A. the minimum 25% landscape area or a plan that satisfies the criteria of Section 18.68.050.A.6 to allow a reduction to this percentage; B. location of all roof mounted equipment and an elevation demonstrating screening in compliance with Section 18.120.108.4(B); C. three (3) disabled parking spaces; D. four (4) bicycle parking spaces at a location within 50 feet of primary entrances to the structure; and E. written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 12 7. A lighting plan shah be submitted to be reviewed and approved by the Tigard Police Department. Staff Contact: Jim Wolf (639-6168 x220). fOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING:INSPECTION 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Durham Road underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $6,600. 9. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plans. 10. Before the City authorizes use of the buildings on the site for any purpose or changes in the approved uses of the buildings on the site, the applicant shall show that the site contains adequate off-street parking for the proposed uses in combination with other existing uses on the site, consistent with CDC Section 18.106. The applicant shall also demonstrate that the proposed tenant is classified as a permitted use. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID-FOR EIGHTEEN BEN CIO MONTHS I OMTHE OFECTIVE DAT OF THI DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The subject property received a Site Permit (SIT 92-0008) in 1992. In 1993, another Grading Permit (SIT 93-0011) was granted to allow the owner to import approximately 8,000 cubic yards of structural fill. No other development applications were found to have been previously filed with the City for this site. Vicinity Information: Adjacent properties to the east, south and west are zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and are developed with two (2) single-family residences. Property on the north side of SW Durham Road is zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) and is developed with single- family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The approximately 65,336 square foot parcel is vacant and covered with grasses and several trees. There has been some structural fill placed on the property over the past couple of years. The applicant is proposing to construct a 21,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ARE INDICATED IN THIS SECTION IN THE "BOLD" PRINT FOLLOWED BY A REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE AND FINDINGS, IF ANY, BY STAFF. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 12 Impact Study: Section 8.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code (CDC) requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure fee that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 , TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street systems. Upon obtaining a building permit, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $20,723 (industrial/warehouse). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $64,759 ($20,723 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial system. Since the TIF paid is $20,723; the unmitigated impact can be valued at approximately $44,036 impact on the collector and arterial systems. Southwest Durham Road has been fully improved and, therefore, no additional right-of-way dedications or street improvements are necessary or required for this project. Since there are no dedications or street improvements, any other required public improvements will meet the rough proportionality test since the unmitigated impacts are an estimated $44,036. Use Classification: The applicant's narrative states that the use of the structure is unknown at this time. Sheet 2.1 of the preliminary plan submittal package shows the floor plans provide for warehouse and manufacturing space. Section 18.68.030 lists manufacturing and wholesale, storage and distribution as permitted uses in the I-P zone. Future tenants of this industrial park will have to comply with the permitted uses listed for this zone. The applicant has been conditioned that, prior to occupancy, each of the tenants for the potential spaces shall be reviewed by the Planning Division for compliance with parking standards. Review of the proposed tenant in regard to the permitted use status shall be reviewed at that time for compliance with this standard by the Planning Division. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.68.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 25% of the site area, except that a reduction to 20% of the site may be approved through the development review process when all of the following performance standards are met: Ai) Street trees to be installed with a minimum • caliper of three inches rather than the two (2) inches required; Aii) the landscaping between a parking lot and the street property line shall have a minimum width of 10 feet; Aiii) all applicable buffering, screening, and setback requirements shall be satisfied; B) the applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 12 landscape area. The site has an average lot width of approximately 234 feet, thereby, exceeding the required 50-foot minimum lot width requirement. The applicant is proposing approximately 14,404 square feet or 22% of the site for landscaping. The landscape plan shows that the Chanticleer Flowering Peer street trees are planted with a minimum caliper of three (3) inches, while it is not clear as to the size of the proposed Goldenchain tree. The landscaping between the parking lot and the street property line is only five (5) feet. Buffering and screening has been provided in accordance with buffering standards. The plans do not show that all of the criteria have been satisfied to allow less than the minimum 25% landscape requirement. A revised plan shall be submitted that either provides the minimum 25% landscape area or satisfies the criteria to allow a reduction to this percentage. Setbacks: Section 18.68.050 states that the front yard setback shall be a minimum of 35 feet and that no side or rear yard setback is required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum building heights is 45 feet. As indicated on the plans, the front yard setback is at least 70 feet, well in excess of the minimum 35-foot setback. Side and rear yard setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing a building height of 25 feet, under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions) or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures), which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1 . These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year Floodplain) or 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Over the years, the property has had fill transported onto the property to create the existing conditions. There is no topography and natural drainage areas in need of preservation. All but two (2) of the existing trees on the site will be preserved. The proposed plan also includes new parking lot and street trees. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This proposal abuts a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 12 (Code Section 18.100.13u). Buffering and Screening will be provided in accordance with the requirements of that section, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining • properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The site plan only indicates that the parking and storage areas will be screened from adjoining properties. The applicant shall submit a revised plan that shows the location of all roof mounted equipment and an elevation demonstrating screening in compliance with this section. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. A lighting plan showing that lighting fixtures are selected, designed and situated to direct light towards areas of the site vulnerable to crime shall be submitted in accordance with this section. The plan shall be reviewed by the City of Tigard Police Department. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The landscape plan shows the provision of Chanticleer Flowering Peer and Goldenchain trees along SW Durham Road, in accordance with this section. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, screening has been provided in accordance with this section. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a proposed commercial or industrial park use abuts a single- family use, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. Section 18.100.080.D contains the minimum improvement standards for the buffering area. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1) At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall be not less than 10 feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2) In addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 12 Section 18.100.080.E st.,es that where screening is requirtu the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering; 1) a hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs which will form a 4 foot continuous screen within 2 years of planting, or; 2) an earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials which will form a continuous screen 6 feet in height within 2 years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover or bark mulch, or; 3) a 5 foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. There are existing residences on both the adjoining eastern and western properties. The residence to the east is approximately 400 feet from the property line close to SW Durham Road and the residence to the west is adjacent to the property line and also close to SW Durham Road. Therefore, a 20-foot buffer and screening area is required along these property lines. The western 20-foot buffer area contains approximately 6,240 square feet. Therefore, the buffer shall contain 60, five-gallon; or 120, one-gallon shrubs in addition to the one (1) row of trees. The eastern 20-foot buffer area contains approximately 4,880 square feet. Therefore, the buffer shall contain 40, five-gallon; or 80, one-gallon shrubs in addition to the one (1) row of trees. The proposed plan shows that a 14-foot setback and buffer has been provided along both the east and the west property lines. The plan also shows an existing row of Sequoia trees along the entire length of both the east and west property line. In addition, 31 five (5)-gallon rhododendron shrubs and 38 five (5)-gallon rhododendron shrubs have been planted along the east and west buffer area respectively. Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.100.070.0 states that in-lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the typical buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening required by this code. Given the locations of the existing residences and the screening provided by the mature, existing Sequoia trees, the proposed plan affords the same degree of buffering that would be achieved if a 20-foot buffer and new landscaping were to be installed, thereby, satisfying this standard. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, vision clearance criteria have been satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(D)(2) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per 1000 square feet gross floor area within warehouse (plus 1 space per 700 square feet of patron serving area and 1 space per 200 square feet of office area) for Wholesaling, storage, and distribution. The 21,000 square foot warehouse building would require 21 parking spaces if used as a warehouse. As indicated on the site plan, 61 parking spaces have been provided. Since it is unclear as to the uses of the building, a condition of approval is warranted to facilitate compliance with CDC Section NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 12 18.106 and to avoid creaung any mis-impression that the amount of parking proposed is adequate for all uses or combinations of uses on the site. When specific uses are proposed for the site, the amount of off-street parking provided on the site should be re-evaluated to determine whether off-street parking will be adequate for the proposed use(s) in combination with other use(s) on the site. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 3 disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. The plan shows the provision of two (2) disabled parking spaces. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides one (1) additional disabled parking space, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures. Where possible, bicycle parking facilities shall be placed under cover. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Four (4) bicycle parking spaces are required for this development. The plan shows that three (3) bicycle parking spaces are provided. A revised plan shall be submitted that provides four (4) bicycle parking spaces at a location within 50 feet of primary entrances to structure, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Off-Street Loading spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The plan shows the provision of an off-street loading space, in accordance with this section. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This criteria is satisfied as the proposed plan shows the provision of a 40-foot-wide driveway onto SW Durham Road. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The proposed site plan shows the provision of a four (4)-foot walkway that provides a connection from the entrance to the sidewalk along SW Durham Road, thereby, satisfying this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 12 Mixed Solid Waste ana Recyclables Storage: Section .d.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans show the provision of a trash enclosure. The applicant shall provide a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the location and compatibility of this facility. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant will be removing two (2) trees less than 12 inches in caliper, therefore, no mitigation will be required. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: • Sections 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road, which is classified as an arterial street between SW Hall Boulevard and SW 72nd Avenue on the City's Transportation Plan Map. Durham Road was recently fully improved as a part of a joint Washington County/ODOT project. Sidewalks were also installed as a part of that project, as well as a driveway apron to this site. The applicant's plan indicates that they will use the existing driveway apron for access. No other right-of-way dedications or street improvements are necessary or required for this project. WATER: There is an existing public water line in SW Durham Road that is available to serve this site. There is an existing stubout to the site intended for fire hydrant support. The plan also shows a new water meter will be installed to serve the new building. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 79th Avenue that was extended by the applicant across Durham Road to serve this site at the same time the roadway improvements were constructed. However, the new public sewer line work has not been placed onto a one-year maintenance period. In order to place the work onto a one-year maintenance period, the applicant will need to submit a maintenance bond on City forms. Prior to connecting to the lateral stubbed out to this site, the applicant will need to contact the Engineering Department and work toward placing the public sewer work mentioned above onto a one-year maintenance period. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 12 STORM DRAINAGE: The topography of this site falls primarily to the east. The applicant's plan indicates that they will route the surface water from this site toward the northeast corner where it will be treated in an on-site water quality facility before discharging into the existing 15-inch public • storm drainage line in SW Durham Road. Calculations were submitted by the applicant which show that the existing 15-inch line has adequate capacity to handle the additional storm water runoff that will be generated from this project. Therefore, no on-site detention is necessary. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65% of the phosphorus contained in 100% of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant's plans indicate they will propose a "buried pipe trench" as the on-site water quality facility. Staff has spoken with the applicant's engineer regarding this type of system and that, in general, they do not work well in Tigard due to the high amounts of clay in the soil. If the applicant wishes to pursue this type of infiltration system, they will need to submit additional evidence from a qualified geotechnical engineer indicating the soil is suitable for an infiltration system. The geotechnical report and water quality calculations will need to be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines on SW Durham Road adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a • fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 240 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $6,600. SECTION V. STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and has the following comments: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 12 • 1 . SIT 93-0011 has expired. The fill over the site must meet grading and fill requirements of OSSC Appendix 33; 2. every portion of exterior walls must be within 150 feet of a fire access road. Provide a clear 20-foot-wide access road around the building; 3. every required exit shall have a landing connected to an accessible route to the public way, out of the traffic lane around the building; 4. the storm system does not meet the requirements of the OSSC section 11. An engineered system must be provided; and 5. the building shall be protected by an automatic fire suppression system. Provide a F.D.C. within 70 feet of fire hydrant. F.D.C. cannot pressurize the fire hydrants. The City of Tigard Water Department states that although they have no objections to the project, we will require that the double check valve assembly be replaced with a detector double check valve assembly. Also, since water demands have not been established, please contact Water Division for appropriate sizing of water service. We also require, as a minimum, a double check valve assembly (backflow protection) device on the property side of the meter. The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Division has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the application and has the following comments: Sanitary Sewer: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. Storm Sewer: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating flow. Water Quality: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. Sensitive Area: A "Sensitive Area" exists. Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. GTE states that the developer/owner will be required to provide a 4-inch PVC to GTE specifications at a GTE designated location. • NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 12 PGE has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY APRIL 22, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON APRIL 22, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. APRIL 9, 1998 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Associate Planner/AICP 4,L4 747, April 9, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers•orff DATE Planning Manager is\curpin\will\sdr98-04.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0004-METZGER BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 12 T 1 W = - W Q. T■ • 1■■■ CD ti h ii BEAD 3 .,m1 • 77lac roe �c Z ammo•si WRNS 1,471,1 u■000010:7 10•(I1 W♦ 1 •N T vALN • O'�� c.••=4 S•M■ _\�f Va ; 0415110 Aewarw \•\1 x • \ �A rna� 11 �+ 1 • '' ••o�arxra � • M _3. � • r CID sl I z• • ■ ry t• �o � :E � i b Z_ 10.100105 4 - - �A~PO Zr r��a�aaaaeeA�oe�oa.�����^�^�.����.a4aoae�w3aeaaQ' P.IE..•..E w■�wP. swim ■■; MN Ac swill w KNIT sew P •------ 1 PAN!G.E•- tria W . ■yrl PAM OIEr RLA PO "«x ■ �LYi•74.00MW OFFICE/WAREHOUSE MANUFACTURING CI CC [21,000 SQ.FTJ 1 q b i Q u.wrreo—,y -0 A1E■ ~zr llm 0.11••IX0.O-' OM 01100m PAM ` 4L O Arll(vs,W[/`----N • �J LAbe.tESSMSMS ss s•gm s•N0 7700.77+■•s•E- 1.„„.... 4 A k iiii . 1 i .-Q . 1 IMMI I I !1,-,1 IL:.f ; P ...a i , o .1. , •-1 w• ,. w.1n•�,1. rl• 1 r.•w• a-•• r a 1.1.. • I Y 1 • r' 1 l r..r� 7. CASE NOES]&CASE NAMEISL- f I I SITE PLAN SDR 98-0004 ......0111111MIMM=IIIrMINIMm MN, EXHIBIT MAP N Mãiiiiiiuii1ng mom f--..0p�t .7. 1, im...-■ Fa. CITY of TIGARD ' W �== :...i t GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM S a!M E� al" ii_ I VICINITY MAP r 111 >l111w alm ..� i 0 _____ AS 1 111 VIII ION _ �� ( $111198-0004 IPIP . �C �� Metzger Building �a - t X11 •E 1 I Ern I7 LN 1 :WI I I I i ) Vc w i�y ` 0 8/111111 ....L. W ,pA • LN ;3111111111111 T � Mb NI �QCS■6 ill =_ .'111'1'1'1'm f- O-3- 11111111 2 0 DURHAM RD r IL � O 9y 1 '.4 t D. ‘\, ,,,,,,,,St cc PAR CEL �'O N rt CO Q� 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feel hgM re 378 Net 'QO Allie a�5� r City ofTiyard 0 I I r fi �O Information on this map a for general location only and 4 !� should be verified with the Development Services Division. QQV 31� 13125 SW Hall Blvd ` Q Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 Community Development G,fl Plot date:Feb 27,1998;c\magidmagic0l.apr 5 p q' —o ,L > ZJi >3Lo6-1, (paaj e i o-C 1-) EXHIBIT 13 2S112CD-01000 2S112CD-01100 E11,AMBACK HAROLD MILDRED SCHOEWE DALE D i 7735 SW DURHAM RD 7925 SW DURHAM ROAD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 12C D-01300 2S 113BA-00200 BUCHANAN MICHAEL R&SHEILA M METZGER DAVID G/DIANNE S 10525 SW TIGARD ST PO BOX 275 TIGARD,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S113BA-00300 2S113BA-00400 DURKEE RALPH D&MARY H CO-TRS HAMBACH MICHAEL V& 7910 SW DURHAM RD 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S113BA-00401 2S113BA-00500 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO 13157 SW PACIFIC HWY 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 JIM ANDREWS NICOLI ENGINEERING 9025 SW CENTER STREET TIGARD OR 97223 k�SiYiife".. _ ..... " r ; COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal e , A. P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 9 7 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR1 98.0004 >METZGER BUILDING< • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site 13125 SW Hall Blvd . Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21,000 • • ❑ Duplicate square foot office/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Tigard ,Oregon 9 7 2 2 3 p•cate Affidavit Durham Road; WCTM 2S 113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is lo- ;' • • cated east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P.The Industrial Accounts Payable Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, ` and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products,packaging and processing, wholesale,storage, and dis- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION tribution among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, STATE OF OREGON, ) 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )5s. I, Kathy Snyder f – - 1 being first duly sworn, depose and say that I m the Advettisin, L.4, = L J Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard–Tualatin Times j a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 _ _{ i _ ^✓/ IIll and 193.020; published at_ Ti garc. in the ' . '6---TA --411 aforesaid county and state; that the X11 _ �� I Mtezger Building SDR 98-0004 -- i ! L___,..11r �, _� r , , a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the # I .a k — entire issue of said newspaper for ONE - successive and • I I ./.111 consecutive in the following issues: Ii \ � / ` s I \' j/S ,\ '+ 9! -April 9, 1998 °' 4 I i • v. 0- � The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on April Subscribed and sworn before me this_9th day of April , 1998 22. 1998. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accor- - dance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Com- -. _ -, !:, munity Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be Not Public for Oregon %+IV% ; t, filed within ten (10)days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for • 7,7 -.: Ni,,, t filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,April 22.1998. ssion Exp -;vim ��"` MY GOM TT9089–Publish April 9, 1998. r MEM '__ CITY of TIGARD . : ■ A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 1LN 1 !111111 �� AREA NOTIFIED _ x:11 If. 1111 ONE 1 i11 , z • ,_ �� 2S1 'coo1.,1.I i► iz SDR 98-0004 2S 2c001 71 251120001000 , I ce A Metzger Building iv DURHAM RD - ---___---� � , O 2S11 F BA01 ftilli . �9 1 �ti 13BA00401 Oc'P�. 2S113BA00400 Ski, �1��P Ro 2S113BA00500 �yF �4f � �O RI • 4Z 4'2 4 42- �� * O G,p • , , N igt ---- 0 100 X300 400 Feet P=322 feet _i .,_+:1 11.. City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. ' 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 _ (503)639-4171 http://www.ci.tigard.ocus Community Development Plot date:Feb 27, 1998;c:lmagiclmagic01.apr APPLICANT MATERIALS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW i. . .il, APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: WU DATE OF PRE-APP.: 12.- Z,3- cri Property Address/Location(s): 1 1,0C •11.1. ti,LI tali AM t2,17! FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): i 1 I 313 Case No.(s): 5'/>7'l55-- -aLt"7 5/ Ldj- N(J: 2-DO Other CaseNo.(s): Receipt No.: Site Size: (05,330 SF / I.4c1 A[,. Application Accepted By: C Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': b .V ID t"L etz, Date: a�ctS-Cg Address: Pb• $OX 2"15 Phone: City: 61-1E t 1D i [,V,. Zip: q 114 D Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant': GAME AS P lie)?Pia r a IN,t-{ v.. Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: Phone: City: Zip: f t A,4,,, l c-- Fi riM-e-i TOTkt16 ApFUcTibM TO: Jlt"i, ANDIZ.ElraS a tUcol,1 E1YG∎IREV-OM-V.1• CITArea: *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Rev.4/21/97 i:�curpinlmastersl5dra.doc authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: ❑ Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): ❑ Owners Signature/Written Authorization ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed GD WOT P-U LT A 1-110b0 ' . ± IBIt.l 1 L.C?1 t4 L/7 ❑ Site/Plot Plan A',OG IAT en ITE t M PP.M .M Et-tro. (#of copies based on pre-app check list) -Nt. S"1'P-Li GT la l2e is 11) V,5- As ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 111 (,DNGiZ fG Ttt,T- u p I3L11LL71NILA. W/ ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) S Lo P 19 IZ-evc -• Ili F A)ec-T ❑ Construction Cost Estimate 15 "4,P E-Li LAT WF4 Attb N 1ENAsT5 ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card t� AN E l b ENT1 FlF-b Al' I'RIG 7 14-41• , (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) S 800.00 I (5100.000-5999,999) $1,600.00 I (s1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+55/$10,000) l• 1 a • List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: / VP*to l N CE IA f t✓L- - QU_s-r t::, 6P-- TH E- S-fi Ia�cG --/ }3 LL Pr-1-?1 N. (� tzF c .1.1 Lei M. N TS- d t`t ''r K A�/' ' *- I,l_tr c->T , APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the EEQUIRED SUBMITTAL_LEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • Ii . . ••• - a.•• :.r- • • 1 • • • . . 1 • - %•• L- t• 1 •I I • 11 • ••, • 1.- It W • • -11 •• y ••1 1 : • "An =DIM • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to ail the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that • any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, induding the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 1 3 day ltbE 19 `lv liptie 0 (1 1 111.___ripleUPLiti b. .. A.4.11.41111P • gnature IV 441110 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 1 1 444 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 6/27/98 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0004 FILE TITLE: METZGER BUILDING APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: David Metzger Nicoli Engineering PO Box 275 - 9025 SW Center Street Sherwood, OR 97140 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 620-2086 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 21 ,000 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building. LOCATION: 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. The subject site is located east of SW 79th Avenue, west of SW 76th Avenue and on the south side of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park zoning allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: FRIDAY MARCH 20,1998 K STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: THURSDAY APRIL 2,1998 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISIOI■Jj VICINITY MAP K LANDSCAPE PLAN NARRATIVE K SITE PLAN K TREE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARBORIST REPORT OTHER_ STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 315 SDR 98-0004 METZGER BUILDING PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MIib,li1 ir lir 1 i 1 I■ - . _750 S.W. Pacific Hwy. - - -- o 0 /� I�� �I,� � 11 II IL FL1 1 ■PII P.O. Box 23784 �s� - �� �� l�lJ\1�llUll_�_ _ /n1� .'; �• !�4l1._ Tigard, Oregon 97223 a�� I�= I► 1�, i II\,1 9 9 ��js:.��U o..( 2 , 18 . 1 e JOB NO 2Z- and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 ATT[NT N RE 11 wry vvc\ GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION l 7 - I12ClQj � CQ I 2 . 13 .945 5 4 - ! `�_ tom_• I1 • •.IJ �IaL �� � _ I I 4 tt.¢, fi)o_,. A,.P1,. ww... ' ? -ce.,.�.i C c p.p.._Lest M 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: VFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections D Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO nn. rr SIGPI e.�„Y,0 4/). c r A_I l ..a/ • foTirL ;11 February rY OF t 27, 1 998 l� D Mr Jim Andrews 925 SW C Center Tigard, OR 9722 Street RE 3 NOTICE OF COMPLETE Dear Mr. Andrews: SUBMITTAL This �Al (SDR s to inform Planning Department is considered t t Your application Sincerely, o°mPlete r r Site Development as been accepted Review by the W'I' D, Associate Brea Planner c: y���rn� SDR 98-0044 land d use file 13123 SW Noll Blvd Tigard, OR 47223 (503)639-4777 rpD (-503)684,2772 ■ 1 ii•(dell:■OM at au r:ai■MIN -iIIIrMINIII ii iiiiliiari and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: (503) 620-2086 METZGER BUILDING OWNER: DAVID METZGER P.O. BOX 275 SHERWOOD, OREGON 97140 SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR: 7800 S.W. DURHAM .RD. TIGARD, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS *SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM *APPLICATION CHECKLIST *NARRATIVE STATEMENT *IMPACT STUDY *PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT *NEIGHBOR NOTIFICATION LETTER MAILING LIST SIGN UP SHEET FROM MEETING AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE AVVIDAVIT OF MAILING *STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION & CALCULATIONS *REDUCED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS *VARIANCE REQUEST PREPARED BY : JDA DATE : 2-13-98 PAGE I OF 34 • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: Wp DATE OF PRE-APP.: 12-- z 3— °CT Property Address/Location(s): 1 SDI bL42.1 ASS FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 1 13BA Case No.(s): Ldt NU: 2-OD Other CaseNo.(s): Receipt No.: Site Size: (o5.33b SF. / 1-4et AG. Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: b d.V l p Hat/vie-12 Date: Address: p r7, $DX 21 Phone: City: 54-I,Ep-, D (:)2, Zip: 91 )4 0 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: SANE •5 Piz•b PPIzT ltil N.a1`- Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: Phone: City: Zip: p 4 1.410 itiLl� '5R,r3c- h TO MI tP> CAT W ht TO: j t At orzet e t■llcou -V4.6ttaE�e.tt--lc t• CIT Area: ' When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Rev.4/21/97 i:lcurpinlmasters\sdra.doc authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: ❑ Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): ❑ Owners Signature/Written Authorization ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed GbN` I WILT A 21 ,opo s.F, ± 15u ILD1 t4!,7 ❑ Site/Plot Plan /1∎ 70C IAT -t' E I'm 'I.M Pc2-ov ENT '. (#of copies based on pre-app check list) T G r U rze I S -T v:s ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2-x 11-) Tt t<T- u P ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) tZOb ' ?ZoJEcr ❑ Construction Cost Estimate 15 "`PPEULAT1VF-` Aub No alaa-rs ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card t-3a\t E l b DTI FL - ' 16\- -T RI -T Lh�tE (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ Filing Fee (under 5100.000) $ 800.00 (5100.0004999.999) S1,600.00 (51 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+55/510,000) 1 • ;t any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as rt of this application: P,. VA tzt M c, IA\u, a - Q.i s-r tr_-_=. (512- THE. S -t" a.AG-� i3 Li.PF V.-1N. &I t?Fr>lU_t_ M .E,wre_ ô -1- 1 -tom Ate[" t/,l T rt2-OF TY LLR S, 'PLICANTS: u consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as th scribed on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. !tailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) n APPUCANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject propel. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that • any such statements are false. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this •- • 19 ___...•oe,.41pio, 14116 IIIP, 441111°° r- gnature Air 44 Owner's Signature c ner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 I. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST ,I''.1111 CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: \ J Date: I — 3—q-7 I[APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./ MARKED ITEMS II A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization ar- C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement E) Filing Fee No. of Copies 1 g $ 5E -TF fi51TE-SPEOFC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS II A) Site Information showin No. of Copies I 1. Vicinity map LE/'- 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: C (a) Floodplain areas 0 0 (b) Slopes in excess of 25% 0 (c) Unstable ground (d) Areas with high seasonal water table 0 (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential 0 (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: ❑ (a) Rock outcroppings 0 (b) Trees with 6" caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and c type of on and off-site noise sources raT'' 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLICATION✓LIST B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1 9 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties Q/ 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: ❑ (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets ❑ that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: ❑ (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑/ 8. The location areas to be landscaped Ly 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies l' The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines Et (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals tam (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated t� LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Dray, ,s Indicatin : - The site development plan proposal shall include: No. of Copies )g 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landsca a Plan Indicatin : The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site of Copies _i_a___ analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ❑ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces 0 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 3----- 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 ❑ of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: H) Preli •inary Partition/Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. lndicatin:: No. of Copies 1 . T - owner of the subject parcel 2. Th- owner's authorized agent ❑ 0 3. The ap scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Desc Option of parcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Locati.n, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways whin and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location f all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all ❑ property I es 7. Location a width of all water courses 0 8. Location of ny trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ❑ ground level 9. All slopes gre er than 25% ❑ 10. Location of exi ting utilities and utility easements ❑ 11. For major land artition which creates a public street: ❑ (a) The propos d right-of-way location and width (b) A scaled cro s-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable de d restrictions 13. Evidence that land artition will not preclude efficient future land ❑ division where appli able LAND USE APPUGTION,i UST I) Subdi ision Prelimil...ry Nat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Sc e equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one pha per sheet ❑ 2. The oposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicini , map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of ap•lication ❑ 6. Boundary II es of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of a•'acent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining panels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines r-lated to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grade. greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, loc. ion, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the pro•osed subdivision): (a) Public and pri .te right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and priv.te sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water rains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telep one transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations fo parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profit of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water dist 'bution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire h rants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles sh wing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a re onable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed str:et right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to in ndation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of :II water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, appro 'mate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used or purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon suc • lots. 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 'nches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including t - location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision provements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wet nds & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably e shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrati e and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PACE s CF S J) Solar Access Calculations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:login‘patty4nasters\Iticl ist.mst Mav 23,1995 LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 rrc74Ve II I_ I - :- - NiiNEE*IN : _ . . and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 NARRATIVE Project: Metzger Building 7800 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR Applicant: David Metzger Prepared by: Nicoli Engineering The following narrative addresses the applicable approval standards as outlined in the pre- application conference notes prepared by Mr. Will D'Andrea dated 12-23-97. This narrative should be used in conjunction with the submitted site development review documents. Section 18.100 Landscape& Screening: • 18.100.030 Street Trees Four street trees are being proposed along SW Durham Road. • 18.100.040 Cut and Fill Around Existing Trees The only area where the proposed grades are not compatible with the grades adjacent to the existing trees is at the property line. A portion of the eastern concrete block retaining and several rock walls are being proposed at this location to maintain the existing grades at the existing trees. • 18.100.070 Buffering& Screening The applicant is requesting a variance to the required `Buffering and Screening" requirements. The properties to the east and west are in the I.P. zone,but have single family residences. The buffering matrix requires a 20' - 0"buffer zone and screening. The screening provisions will be maintained,the variance is requesting that the 20' - 0"buffer zone be reduced. ( See Variance Request ) Section 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas: • 18.102.020 Visual Clearance: Required The 35' - 0"visual clearance area requirement has been maintained at the access way onto SW Durham Road. This requirement has been noted on the landscape plan. E NG1NEIRING and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 Narrative-Metzger Building 7800 SW Durham Road February 13, 1998 Page 2 Section 18.106 Of Street Parking& Loading Requirements: • 18.106.030 Minimum Off Street Parking Requirements The use of the structure is unknown at this time. Warehouse/Manufacturing uses will require 21 spaces. There have been 61 spaces provided, which will allow for additional office space or uses which may have greater parking needs. Section 18.108 Access, Egress and Circulation: • 18.108.040 Public Street Access A 40" - 0"existing concrete approach was constructed during the Durham Road Project for access onto Durham Road. No additional curb cuts are being proposed. • 18.108.050 Required Walkway Location A pedestrian walkway has been provided from the public sidewalk to all proposed building entrances Section 18.120 Site Development Review: • 18.120.090 Application Submission Requirements The site development plans address all the submission requirements as outlined in this code section. Section 18.150 Tree Removal: • 18.150.025 Plan Requirement A 6"Birch and a 6"fir tree will be removed for the proposed development. The remaining 30 sequoias, fir and oak trees will be preserved. The development preserves 90% of all existing trees. No mitigation is required. Section 18.164 Street & Utility Improvement Standards: • 18.164.030 Streets No street improvements are being proposed. I i1 • I 1Liiiiik II . If ENO INErE '' 'I . _ and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 Narrative-Metzger Building 7800 SW Durham Road February 13, 1998 Page 3 • 18.164.090 Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer line in Durham Road has been"stubbed"to the site and will be utilized for this development. • 18.164.100 Storm Drainage An analysis has been performed on the existing 15" diameter storm drainage line in Durham Road and the line has capacity to accept discharge from this site. A buried pipe trench is being proposed for the on site water quality facility. The exact design has not been determined at this time. The applicant is obtaining prices for the various"systems" as noted in the Preliminary Storm Drainage Calculations submitted with the site design review submittal package. I : . ' I I I _ : NICOti ; N31� ERI - and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784*Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 IMPACT STUDY Project: Metzger Building 7800 S.W. Durham Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Applicant: David Metzger P. O. Box 275 Sherwood, Oregon, 97140 Prepared by : Nicoli Engineering The following information is provided as a vehicle to quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: This proposed development should not have an adverse impact on the existing transportation system. The site has provided for truck/car traffic to maneuver on site. Truck and car traffic will only use Durham Road to access the site, not to facilitate car or truck maneuvering requirements. Durham Road has recently been`upgraded" and provided with a center turning lane which will allow for access to the site from Durham Road. BIKEWAYS: Two bicycle parking spaces have been provided at the North East corner of the building and at the southern parking area. DRAINAGE SYSTEM: No drainage ways or systems are adjacent to this site. PARK SYSTEM: This project should not have an adverse impact on the park/recreational systems. _ °Le_ _ _ . _ pvIGINEERING and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 Impact Study- Metzger Building David Metzger February 13, 1998 Page 2 WATER SYSTEM: The site has a 1" diameter water line stubbed to the site. No additional connection are required for this facility. Water usage is unknown at this time, since the buildings use has not been determined at this time. STORM DRAINAGE: The site will drain to the existing 15"diameter public line located in S.W. Durham Road. The calculations have been obtained from the engineering firm responsible for the improvements to Durham Road. The existing line has capacity to accept the runoff from the proposed development. Calculations has been submitted with the Site Development Review documents to verify the capacity of the line. An on site water quality facility is being proposed prior to discharging into the public line. SANITARY SEWER: A sanitary sewer line was already stubbed to the site and will be utilized by this facility. NOISE IMPACT: The building has not been leased at this time, therefor any noise sources, if any, cannot be determined. It is understood that whatever/whoever occupies the facilities will meet all noise requirements. - VALUE CHANGE NOTICE I ! m s 9 Rent Market Value(RMV) last'fr r This Year Cone Area i account ,lumGer 9 MARKET VALUES: i 023- 74 ___ i R514054 I LAND 43, 600 45 , 050 711/97 to 6/30/98 N 9 STRUCTURE 410 440.0-°' 8 : WASHINGTON REAL TOTAL VALUE 44, 010 45, 490E-- Property DesoripLion( DNur ) P f Towruhip! p Si pang: � K,r:1 114 i 1/1 6. f Tay Lot ` Sge.,ai Imam R E 0 TAXABLE VALUES: 2S113BA-00200 o P .;crvs 1 Property Class i PW Nurnr. : ASSESSED VALUE 44 ,010 34, 150 E R 1 .58 1012 T 1NET ASSESSED VALUE 44 , 010 34 , 150 7800 SW DURHAM RD Property Taxes: 599 . 19 612.27• METZGER , DAVID G/DIANNE S T PO BOX 275 0 A I PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT OPTIONS SHE RWOOD OR 97140 X i [See back of statement tor ions and your appeal right m : Pay By Jscoun:Ai:awed Net Ar,curi: ACRES 1 . 58 S • .,3 2 A 12/ 19/97 15 . 37 3% 496 .901 .- 12/ 19/97 6 .83 2% 334. 69: A 12/19/97 NONE 0% 170. 76 T — DELINQUENT TAXES APPEAL DEADLINE : February 3 , 1998 m M Interest incl„ded the o.:yin: Tax Year T^ — Arricr.l't Value Questions - Call 648-882E E 12/19/97 Tax Questions - Call 648-880 . N . Other Questions - Call 648-8741 T Real property accounts watt an : ��•Q a unpaid balance for any tax year /1 f\uV `��� N :narked with an asterisk (') are "1 t m . subiect to foreclosure if not paid ! ,� )� SEE INSERT FOR APPEAL RIGHTS or. or before May, 15. Any AND PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS payments received on this account Tcta. De.rn.quert Amount MUST be applied Lo delinquent PLEASE MAKE PAYMENT TO: taxes firs:_ • ASSESSMENT & TAXATION O T Ai-TAXES OWED ON THIS hccooNT 496.90: P .O . BOX 3587 PORTLAND , OR 97208 1 II • --1 N1COLJ iNiGINEERIN and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street PO. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 December 10, 1997 To Whom It May Concern: RE: 7800 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR Tax Map # 2S113BH Tax Lot #200 Dear Interested Party: Nicoli Engineering is representing David Metzger the owner of the property located at 7800 SW Durham Road (see attached vicinity map.) The owner is proposing to construct a 20,000 square foot office & warehouse building. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on Tuesday December 30, 1997, at Nicoli Engineering located at 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, Oregon at 6:30 p.m. Please realize this will be an information meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 620-2086 if you have any questions. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA:jh enclosures VICINITY MAP Q Q 5 t- r SJJJ. DURHAM RD. r TIGARD NIGH ant am SCHOOL co UNIFIED SEWERAGE FACILITY DURHAM RIMER OeWNige—APPLICANT= NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. DAVID !"IETZGER 9025 Sill. CENTER ST P.O. 5OX 215 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 Si-IERWOOD, OREGON (503) 620-2086 SITE INFORMATION CONTACT : JIM ANDREWS ADDRESS: 7800 S.W. DURI-1AM ROAD TIGARD, OR 97223 CURRENT ZONING: IP PLANNED INDUSTRIA- L EGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX MAP: 291 1 13514 TAX LOT: 200 CURRENT USE: VACANT LOT PROPOSED USE: LEASE SPACE / OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE Harold Mildred Hamback Dale Schoewe Michael& Linda Halseth '735 SW Durham Rd 7925 SW Durham Rd 7975 SW Durham Rd 'igard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 alph Durkee&H Co-Trs Mary Michael Hambach&Sandra Sattler TIGAR-TUALATIN SCHOOL 7910 SW Durham Rd 7735 SW Durham Rd 13137 SW Pacific Hwy igard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 amily Johnson Michael&Sheila Buchanan Opal Girtman .,965 SW Burnham St 15905 SW 79th Ave 22 Gravatt Dr Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Berkeley, CA 94705 obert Quinn Michael Galloway& A Carol Glen Simons&Jean Healy 105 Peregrine Ct 7780 SW Bond St PO Box 5996 West Linn, OR 97068 Tigard,OR 97224 Portland,OR 97228 Stanley Benge&Marlys Noble Marianne Smith-Henry Robert& Miriam Schnepf 350 SW Bond St 7870 SW Bond St 15880 SW 79th Ave igard, OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Robert&Trish Couture Stephen Dauenhauer&Kay Yancey TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT&NO 23J '327 Dunnock Way 7932 SW Bond St 13157 SW Pacific Hwy rnnyvale,CA 94087 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 ack Bielhan John Benneth _5525 SW 109th Ave. 15550 SW 109th Ave. Tigard , OR 97224 Tigard , OR 97224 Sk \ I \ SI IEET NAM.. � ,4 • • �: 55_ -4011 * 'fMftal/W ._ vosw .. '.- ?22 c °-/1 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard. Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 I, WM At-41:32- 1A , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed tMPtzdvEMENT affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) /SOO s W. h1.112NAM taoA,Ta , and did on the 1 0 day of i7G1✓Ml��t2. 199'1 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a LAt-ir) application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 1 4'bO G.W . 17U -k--114,1•1 12-OAt7 — ALONU/AT PI -OPetzT'Y 1.1J-AP !wt-krlN&. t�Lti12HhM t2-17. (state location you posted notice on property) AiW�14J�. ` MGL — . tture (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the 13— day of Rai , 19d -.iv OFFi IA SQL 1 l ELAMZ MEER ott fV NOTAP.Y PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISYIIN Np.0 7598 N O U B L O F O R G O N ci MY COMMISGION EXPIRES OCT.02,19138 a My Commission Expires: 0-2'f (Applicant. please complete info=ation below for proper placement with proposed project) ry ME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of ApplicanriOwner. i Address Address or eneral L.ocadon of Subject Property: Subject c?roperz+Tax Man(s) and Lot T+s): ,:;o��'catty r.-astersNarf post.:.st AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, 01 t.1 A1-tb12ew , being duly sworn, depose and say that on heGe.t4T3 12- 1 471 , 1991, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) - 1 Sod S.W. ALLIZF-HAM OAC) a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at T1&,' 0.L7 69 PF I( with postage prepaid thereon. S nature (In the presence of a Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the t day of r.tA 19? gr (k17- , • OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PU4LIC-OflEGON —,3s COMM IF,S10 N NQ.037598 MY CO'-'',.,',r;., _y- .Fsmi.02,19°3 i w '�°�"� NOTA Y PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: )(\'2 --It It 6 (Applicant. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) J NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: I ,TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of Applicant'Owner: Address or General Location of Subject Property: Lubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot u(s): j n."bgnmarremasterswimatmst • . . . PIJ _� I1 and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 February 5, 1998 Brian Rager City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Site Development for David Metzger 7800 SW Durham Rd Dear Mr. Rager: The original design criteria for Durham Road was obtained from W & H Pacific, and are enclosed with this packet. The design discharge calculated by W & H Pacific and Nicoli Engineering is based on a 25 year storm event. The proposed site development will effect Durham Rd. from STA 120+50 (east side of development) to STA 124+70 (the outlet). The discharge at STA 120+50 is 3.7 cfs and at STA 124+70 is 4.9 cfs, calculated by W & H Pacific. The discharge from the proposed site development is 3.97 cfs, see enclosed calculations. The maximum capacity of the discharge pipe in Durham Rd., from the fore mentioned stations is 9.4 cfs (calculated by W & H Pacific). The available flow is 4.5 cfs, being greater than the flow from the site development. From the information enclosed, it has been determined the 15" dia. pipe in Durham Rd. is capable of taking the additional discharge. Sincerely, im Nicoli, P.E. 11135 OREGON vq�ES R.O‘CP\• [ EXPIRES: 12-31-92 • SATE ItJFoZMRT %or) T07-AL Sae RR e4 = c'5, 33o se I. 50 acrc3 BUILDING /}Rt�4 = Z 2, 320 SP = 0.61 acrcS 4 S P NAL r /Co N(, _ 21;q2.1 s c = 0,Co la acrd LAND3CA P i NC) otos l SC = C7.32 e�cr�-S bevEZoPe-c CONOtrtoNS% ZS yr STb2,M z = 3.S"^lhY Q; _ (0.90)( 3.5)(O.5I 1-0.(' o) _ 3•(o9 cFs C :0.90 vy,Pegy•o C =0 ZS P�-�viou�s �P= (o.7s)C3.$)(c73z.) = O. Z£3 cP-S TOT 3• -2 CFS Z yr SIC:424'Y) EVENT = 2.5 "'IAN( Ca?, - (v,g0)(2.5)(S-1i- t7. (.o6) = Z.(03 GP-5 C =o. 90 ,.,KPco,O■.s Op = ZS z S (o.32) = d. Zo CFS C = 0,75 p.eiry.ous Qtor = 2.83 CFS PRE"- DevFtoPcrb CoN01n014 S Zsyr SIOIEVNI �v'- Q = Co. 2-0)(3•S) ( I,so)= 1.05 c Ps hc C = e7,2-0 2, yr STbov-n G e T • Q = (O,20)( Z.S)c1. SG.) 0, 76- CFS = 7. 5 "Jr(' C = o. 7o FR-Orr C'ALCILAT10N 5 PRO UI1 A gY 0414 P34 tF%C Foe- i*e Due',gnn Rvr+-a trInP2ov�nieror5 Qcm5r.oc, = y.1cr=s ?%P e4P4ot-Y = 9.°Ic.FS Ram PeoQOS&n s,TE AvAILABLe cLOLJ = 5c7CFS ? 3.g7CFS pk•✓ PROJECT -r H— rn E-rtc e2 13 I-DI • 67 - •VToRM Pu m-D PIPE CA'W..-T 1' PREPARED BY PST DATE 1_76i_9 $ JOB NO.1 7oS2Z. PAGE NO. 1 OF S\2-e- A aURI0p piPE vAL4LT 1).ESI6N FOR A 0. 30 /NG q 1bul2 STOQlvI EVENT Voc = O,3C0 ( %z)(38ccx)) = \N 4o cF = 8S2 8 00.A. PIPer V 4RF-4 Lc&'&T1} Lo 707SF ICeI,Z pt `I Z " yCv2cF 1) 5- Fr B ►Z. 5lv sF 90. 8 PT Sy " IS. osF 7/.L0 FT (00 " sr SBA Fr (in"Ty yAuc.r 'co . = 5 390 2`"G (z.' _ 10 $O e1 c F > ft-to PROJECT iUILbI • I?t - MUNI AQT T-NCh} DEI6,t-4 PREPARED BY 1:912.-I- DATE I , 2�, �� JOB NO.170;2,2 PAGE NO. OF 2- SI �E /N FI L LTQAllo N TR& (4 beSIbN Ford ©. 3(.n Ir citeS I N A 9 Hotoz. ZToRw, EV r T Irvi per uto r4-rz = 3S'ctpo s� Voc = (O.30( 3?000 bc)C��rz) = 1140 CF -ra PAL Y011)3- 33% /LA: ZS.�} rf 'vOL= (.0.33)(21S.53) 05) = 17/10 CF /4 7,07 Ft'''. 7 'o(- = (7,C07)0 0) = L 9 5 c / > I9O I2.1 1 C F _ I cF b!_, PROJECT M rrZ 6•512- ' I N _ P elAMiNAt.Y rt1ze %c t4 t'E5t 4 PREPARED BY p�y?. DATE 2 q JOB NO. S °t�Gy?Z PAGE NO. 7.. OF 2 EN PACIFIC 8405 S.W.Nimbus Avenue Beaverton,OR 97008-7120 February 2, 1998 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Storm Drainage System Calculations Durham Road (Hall Blvd.—Upper Boones Ferry Rd.)Project The Durham Road Project was a 3/4 mile street widening project for ODOT,Washington County, and the City of Tigard, located between Hall Boulevard and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The project consisted of three drainage basins: the West Basin, the Central Basin, and the East Basin. West Basin The West Basin of Durham Road is located between station 100+00 and 105+91. It is located in a large basin that extends west of Hall Blvd. Drainage in this basin was conveyed through an existing 30-inch diameter storm line along the southerly edge of Durham Road. Improvements to this basin included a minor widening of the existing pavement. New impervious areas into this basin included 0.27 acres. The runoff will increase less than 0.10 cfs. Therefore,there will be little to no impact to the existing storm system. Central Basin The Central Basin is located between station 105+91 and the west side of Fanno Creek. The existing runoff was primarily conveyed through an existing roadside ditches and gravel shoulders. The new system was designed based on Washington County's standards using a 25-year storm event and open channel flow. See the attached work sheet and basin map. East Basin The East Basin is a small basin that flows from Upper Boones Ferry Road to the east side of Fanno Creek. The primary object was to pick-up drainage before it hits the railroad tracks. North of Durham Road the runoff is collected in an existing 36"and 42"diameter storm line running along the northerly side. South of Durham Road and East of the tracks, the stormwater collects and outfalls on the east side of the tracks to the existing, original railroad ditch. Drainage west of the tracks on the south side collects in the sag and outfalls into the existing 42" storm immediately east of Fanno Creek. New impervious areas into this basin included 0.34 acres. Increased runoff resulting from this improvement area will result in less than 0.10 cfs. The existing system has adequate capacity. Rick Rates,Washington County, approved the storm sewer system design. If you have any further questions regarding the design, please contact myself at 626-0455, or Tom Hart at(541) 884-3042. Sincerely, William J. Evans, P.E.,P.L.S. Project Manager Attachments 1:\project\02041302\worddata\durstorm.doc • (503) 626-0455 Fax (503) 526-0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture PROJECT: DURHAM ROAD, BASIN "WEST" DESIGN FREQUENCY WashCo, R 1&2 W 25yr (4%) DEFAULT C = 0.85 DEFAULT n= 0.012 - Drainage Area Design Discharge I Storm Pipe Sizing Contributing Area Coef Pipe Total Design Capacity Vel. Station Index A C C*A Sum Flow Tc I Q Slope Dia. n Qf Vf Len. Remarks . No. Ac. Incr. C*A Time Time in/hr cfs % inches cfs fps feet 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 105+91 F1 0.20 0.25 0.05 0.05 10.0 2.50 F2 0.22 0.90 0.20 0.25 10.0 2.50 F3 0.22 0.90 0.20 0.45 10.0 2.50 110+50 F4 0.18 0.25 0.05 0.49 10.0 2.50 _ 1.2 2.78 12 0.012 6.4 8.2 265 G1 1.07 0.25 0.27 0.76 20.0 1.80 Use G1 overland Tc G2 0.14 0.90 0.13 0.88 20.0 1.80 G3 0.15 0.90 0.14 1.02 20.0 1.80 113+15 G4 0.11 0.25 0.03 1.05 20.0 1.80 1.9 0.75 12 0.012 3.3 4.3 85 H1 0.59 0.25 0.15 1.19 0.3 20.3 1.79 H2 0.05 0.90 0.05 1.24 20.3 1.79 114+00 H3 0.05 0.90 0.05 1.28 20.3 1.79 2.3 0.70 15 0.012 5.9 4.8 202 I1 0.78 0.25 0.20 1.48 0.7 21.0 1.76 12 0.12 0.90 0.11 1.59 21.0 1.76 116+02 13 0.12 0.90 0.11 1.70 21.0 1.76 3.0 1.53 15 0.012 8.7 7.1 192 117+97 J1 0.22 0.85 0.19 1.88 0.5 21.5 1.74 is\project\02041301\gprodata\durstorm.wb2 W&H Pacific 12-14-94 PROJECT: DURHAM ROAD, BASIN "WEST" DESIGN FREQUENCY WashCo, R 1&2 W 25yr (4%) DEFAULT C = 0.85 DEFAULT n = 0.012 Drainage Area Design Discharge_ Storm Pipe Sizing - Index Area Coef Pipe Total Design Capacity Vel. Station No. A C C'A Sum Flow Tc I Q Slope Dia. n Of Vf Len. Remarks Ac. Incr. C*A Time Time in/hr cfs % inches cfs fps feet 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3.3 1.62 15 0.012 8.9 7.3 100 119+03 J2 0.12 0.90 0.11 1.99 0.5 21.9 1.73 3.4 2.28 15 0.012 10.6 8.6 141 120+50 K 0.21 0.90 0.19 2.18 0.3 22.2 1.71 3.7 2.61 15 0.012 11.3 9.2 273 L1 0.78 0.25 0.20 2.37 0.5 22.7 1.70 L2 0.14 0.90 0.13 2.50 22.7 1.70 L3 0.14 0.90 0.13 2.63 22.7 1.70 123+23 L4 0.30 0.25 0.08 2.70 22.7 1.70 4.6 1.82 15 0.012 9.4 7.7 147 124+70 M 0.21 0.90 0.19 2.89 22.7 1.70 4.9 2.00 15 0.012 9.9 8.1 55 i:\project\02041301\qprodata\durstorm.wb2 W&H Pacific 12-14-94 ■ ! . I m I o -eCTIC,N• To'JSHip, F- '&13, 2 S.. 1 W. 1 . ! 11 1 I ! _ -------------- s_ __ __ - S.W. __ mow. .___—._--__..._----- I °l l a !I i 11. . " 1 1 o A jEs1 s i d R m I $ i P o 1i I a, =' i i I oon u w ,e, i 1 i i i 13 - .._.._..j r- R R F• i i i U i $ ._..-.._.t_ J..__1 i I i 1 8 i 1 i 1 P i allii II P P o i 4 g S.W. 79TH AVE. \ti ! $ I i I I •. . l ° is i.i i I I ; i I i I ! ! t! / i i f Pi 31t �O .0 1 H" .0 ,p * I - -_-- �-� _ Y 1 �pp o D ! 'N / Z i I \ \ —_ S.W;•76TN_AVE. .._. .._._.._.._. \ \ ` ' I i y I DESIGNED BY:OSN CHECKED BY: Washington County DRAWN 8Y: CWf APPROVED 8Y: Durham Road w( P A.CIFIC X DATE BY REVISION CK'D ApPR. BASlNMAP WEST 0405 S.W. Nimbus z BEAVERTON, OR 27000-7120 -J. OREGON Phone; (503) 029-0455 Fe:: {509) 529-0775 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF ---- DRAWING FILE NAME: eI.noiot •tntm.•rint•Surveying NSCALE: PRO . L.neee•p•ereelaeture••tn.lreomenul service. 1"=100• 4-0204-1302 basemapi.dwg :. , •1a s iii 3 e m 6 %I i ig 1 i i 'd i ig 1 8liia 1R ;): 81 i M1$I : fir€ ,_ L 4 Al N 71101 1 ... , • . .. ._.. -,.-_, ir, \ 0 4 ot, a <NI.TT,In A z, ,, s I ,1 a mi vul I 101 ,11 10. ' 1 11 ii 11111 1 .1 T 14. :.:i 1.11.'1.01:10.749.IIU• old Can otn.c•en S•••••Int. 9116 U Gtr 7ti•f1 IN 1311 Not -----•------------ -_ D v R R A rK 099121-2111' _ R D D �,....., 'at• mar••.•.. �.WORM WIPP la! , u+wa *• MIME r.•o•or • { a ••` I _ • R. al t 117.9 R e Z, i !. IENDION I• •n V 3wNaeaxaeeN.•..,NeNeeEXIEMI.•• aaaeaieuaegie II me=111WIFIN !Dore um■■■r!, 11.21MAULti A.U.a K. VELUM Pr IV TIP MOKPO PPE PP NPR. • CI f 1 OnT.1.. xyeia,. P.., IMET2NOIER ..n.• ....r. .,) BILDIdO LAPOICAPIP. 14,10•1 PP— , ru r�rr PIMP r. •�r 7E00 SN.DURHAM ROAD . W.P.M. 1Cr& 71GM0,OREGON 07773 r•rom, s c rncr soma GAT: TAM.n•u v ID 0••• DAND ••••••PALM ' i `l 21(0 11ii:GI • ir..•....�rI1 L•:I••1■:SIN UI:1:I■•4Re ad N:a1.w.Na1 Sala.inc. 1■b SI Car•IS•ES I.1310 PWITINO SCHEDULE 4.A—17213 S. W. Pat CI-1011 • r.rx Nr■ 1LSTTw !ACM D _ U . _ HHgk INC •wtu1 03 000110110 m.r 0.0000•000 em. R 0 q D • ® MO lllllLi_ f•G4Jl10 MYI90 `\`\' ION N.RTT �.. N o AP.1ar.1DT.H cNATN APOOPIOTM I T\-M I.1 V.HO N aM • \ lam . ,®® _�sv�,,,s gees® : 21q•...�apuu :.'7,...,11.M:la'..77. a1.C_dmallm..I11.w In. ISOM Cadafted•PI MOM y14 Sq.MO paq 1 1 1 11 1 11 _•--. 1 1 1 1 I � 1 1101111111%.... tli •111114taw.'114;1144;1481. „ N.. p. --... go or ,... N.. N. N. z/ f-'' i I, 1, . tivz i'r'..., f: Tr „/.-. Itili,,. • MOM agP.RZpIRWOE12N 82:1E 12f2XE IES JI IO?0".d"QEIBROPN29 .._._ I..■.a 4wises.. ∎.. • V \ - ♦ cr. /'I -w ft.........j , .... I /, +w.Iw neaw ....11 F I LEI I LRECT: de1�f ,% • • WM•M.a 1 G j I 1; Ti p� 1 �J I i '1 ' N 0 T E e 7e00 S.W.DURHAM ROAD 1 l 71GARD.OREGON 27223 1 1 \1 ; �aa•e OM I 11 / M Mel WRM w Wi..N R TM.MUM DAND Mft. I .e 46MOM MINTY.OMMIN LETZGER I 1 / // II,-1 FT wm�fuel 7mr I ....art s 111Mea anSAIDI PM. POBM 275 I OREGON 07140 III .aw.pO M Mi ifIWP.l1.M.0 MM.K.44IL d, . jj1,. !{���, III 11111W 14011 II 1 1 C • 1 1.� 461111 IOa1c t-1}92 11 a e 1 I __ Sege f-]o'-a' f,Ailikki ii. �/ Olaae.by PAT 1 111 gv aw ...M Job Ma: 970522 1 1 1 1 111 OrwYq Nc CROW I/ 1 11 i I 1 I I I I I 1 owe..male IMCanM I•.I _________ ______________________� 11111 ------ --------------------x//11 _�.._�_.s ••ems--� J ORADNO PLAN /5 GRAD 3 PLAN STET r` 1 .3 ` �r iiiii..As ii is �u�n�.�nrn rw--� ••x ...... 1.a nd Ca 99:9:M:19.M.`I Ir1 •a 1 w e-.va r...0 uaur law w e-uw raw• w ea tie w H.�w / M' ^^•tCC. bn u I.MI Imo. M' Mr 11ailWlti'IAV351N r... raw .+ raw r •rx raw% ar-1• ra mr r• raw .-. ry ra Is. +'rx raw• r+v1' raw La g(g 121-0r1 Mt Q�IIF>L71 _______ _ _—_�____ N m.o...r.mnr vl. 11br. pew Nt o DOOR Pi LW or a+v Aam 11 slv, rust S C lI t 7 C X 1l li ti, i, i I .m.r y OVA' /21,4. SSSJJJJ 1-- II I a ` II it LOCATION wm°..w II t LOGAPICH OP i �l.are Re901S i li � , Amman caw.* !j Alww moor Am..nmw.. i 1 1 i i S ° a T it maa PROEM _ • rzcE BUILDING- 1 4i t��ar I i II u �101'i a S.W. 223 3 I 11GA ro,oREGON 9722 a 4 1 0 OiJR: DAVD l' 1! q AETZi i I 3 1.......1 1 I.....ri 12.1.•SAI P.O.BOX 275 i SIERWOOD,OREGON 97141 i 1 ii i 9 Sidi 2-1}oe a a I i 0 a -- Stale 1/e-r-a' Oman by .00 A o Chrd b{ SET Job No.: 973522 _ _ ■ ___ ca c. ___ Orabp Mn: RNF .ur mss—"'ice r��ra `� at". Moan auvac. a 1 WWI e..rr .nm.•.rw Haw .-r 0s.0. 0 ear .l.r.a-sw tar 3-r 7.:.r Zr,,,, -s✓e-rw tar I-r WA....w x.w a_rw.•-n J.• a-.>,.• r-,wf�. 4.1Z.;:,w w• w' lt'i r vlr - R_0011 PLAN FLOOR PLAN • 9tLT 2.1 , _ r.I area :9 ay■:9.M39an9:uc L _ -.--.---_-_ - - ♦ �' m0 Can•irvclYn 54,44.9 Mc TAR IftWIL' —�—_ iii -.=�— a PBS II w.$d•PA is ssw (�//��°°''��'' terra 99K 0wO nm PE --� ® = �_ r r OFD . • kk • 000 MAW,a WOW WOW ea WARMS SOUTH ELEVATION or ..a. AL.., ACCWIT -,01.'; 12 0 12 El C El 2 1111111111111111- 5a raw 111110119 MM. �q}�� MT.11�. ... ]4 sear! tMic9 1 V■ i z z Nom.AI Irma r �.•} r.w } �r v AIRS • rOC HNVt V iM>m Omni PROW OM.. YOGY• 1t1 Y WOW awe1 Term Y4.0. l.ImO 1a•11PYL ON 00011! a-gyp `"°`°" NORTH ELEVATION ` fir ,a —�RK�..,r TA AM. t. .^w NETZOBi X ,WHO '*—�—^ ' �M Al k i 7900 SW.DURHAM NOM t,�.`°d-� 7 ` Idll MALI"• 00400 0000 N 97223•0.100 010000.AT WOW DAvo L -.21 ...,„„......,...... R r `c'�T..HA.ROOM r 0.�...•O \•OµyMl1,�ITt,lwiR �Tt�j rs.a®u TRW P.O.BOX 275 MEWL&LD. SHERW000.090000 97140 EAST ELEVATION .,.1404 Mc 2-1}99 rar.•L caw.1.1E0 -- Sc ma 1/9.1-90 wail.DM= 0,90 by LA ♦ 10�i _.. --.—.--.�...---. OwtlnA by PNT Jab Nc: 920572 WPM., __. — [rowing Nd CLEW • SAT AW11t • AA•1 11111119 111011011912,7 MITK MLR .• ..: 1�L.TV MOW . N il -� iliarrom rr.o1 AACrw.. W.W.II OWN.. rya FAX DOOR IV IWW17 ELEVA710P6 .1�1.AA:. WEST ELEVATION SHEET I & NICO ' I • N *4EEFI and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784-Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 VARIANCE REQUEST PROJECT: METZGER BUILDING 7800 SW DURHAM ROAD TIGARD, OREGON The applicant is requesting a variance to the setback requirements on the east and west property lines. The site is located within the Industrial Park District( I.P.) zoning designation. According to the set back requirements in this zone, there are no side yard setback requirements. Per Section 18.100.130 `Buffer Matrix", a 20'0"screened buffer is required because the project site boarders 2 residential uses, even though they are within the I.P. zone. Mr. Metzger has obtained permission(letter enclosed) from the land owners to the west (7910 S.W. Durham Rd., tax lot 300)to encroach 10' into the 20' buffer. With the existing 8" diameter Sequoias along this edge(applicant planted approximately 11 years ago), and the addition of new trees and Rhododendrons in this area, the neighbor is satisfied w/the 10'-0"buffer. Technically,the site to the east (7735 S.W. Durham Rd.,tax lot 100) must be considered a residential use, even though the actual residence is approximately 400' from the site. The Sequoias and the additional Rhododendrons will provide an adequate screen for the 10'-0"proposed buffer area. It will only be a matter of time and the adjacent properties will be developed. When this occurs, The"Screened Buffer"will no longer be required. Providing a 10'-0" screened buffer will provide the necessary separation for the residences at this time, and provide a positive amenity to the site in the future. We believe that the requested variance will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties and allow the applicant to full utilize the developable portion of the site. February 9, 1998 In regards to the request of David and Dianne Metzger: Ralph and Mary Durkee,owners of Tax Lot 300,Durham Road,Tigard,Oregon, agree to the setback of 10 feet on Tax Lot 200 for paving and sidewalk for the proposed building on the west side of Tax Lot 20D. 71g all la /4/ 4- if " PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES dib OF TiGARa �' • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ,,:J"mmuiu�ttpeetr:r P'� r NON-RES1DENTIAL o41E I — ST AS: l r\1..)'D2 EA APPLICANT: AGENT: M Phone:[ l ` Phone: [ l 'ZO — Z0g60 PROPERTY LGCATION: ADDRESS: 1 goo c ) TAX MAP/TAX LOT: 2,51 1313A - a_oo NECESSARY APPLICATION[S]: "NF V E Lci N1F NT 1Ew PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION- ZZ.1 3Z0, W,°tRC\-Noy F./j/),,41 )lJFlic_TUIC)AJC?' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: _L--- • ZZONING DESIGNATION: —� I CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT 3 U v¶4 FACILITATOR: TEAM AREA PHONE (503) TONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. ft. Average lot width: 50 ft. Maximum building height: L45-ft. setbacks: Front 35 ft. Side NA ft. Rear ft. Corner Maximum site coverage: -1.5/ 0/0 Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation n area:m S street. /zp% [Refer to Code Section 18. (0 8 ) ;DDITIONAL LOT DIMENSI NAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum to frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as pa of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access ea ement. The cepth of all ots shall not exceed Z.- times the average width. unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimu lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Sectio 18.164.060-tots) — Tf OF t16AR0 Pre-Acplcatfon Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 ;�1 �u�t11liNlunuJMadi1I.urtsutS.ctlu SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: feet from the centerline of Established' eas: feet from • Lower intensity z es: feet, along the site's boundary. Flag lot: 10-foot side rd setback. (Refer to Code Section and 18.961 PECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exception* - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum uilding floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual build' setbacks will be at least half (K) of the building's height: and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.0201 'ARKING AND ACCESS) - - Required parking for this type of use: I R. `D(p. 3c, . D. ( Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): No more than 47/o of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 8 inches x 18 feet. • Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. (Refer to Cade Section 18.106.0201 Handicapped Parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided. as well as the parking stall dimensions. are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shad be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: i' Minimum access width: 3d ( Minimum pavement width: 2 1 All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108] :ITY Of T16AR0 Pre- np1Icatloo Cortferenca Notes Page 2 of 8 Il$-lssIr..naI arsucatl.uflaasMIi lou:ta.0 s•ct1.. W AY REQUIREMENTS a ways s a extend from the .ound floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs. ramps. or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501 COADU _ IT—MENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10.000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.010-0901 'IUEARYIS1ON AREA he City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.1021 � NG AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required: these-Pe often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities. and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. z O feet along east boundary. i feet along south boundary. 2-50 feet along west boundary. In addition. sight obscuring screening is required along • -72--A.6}-1 4 "ge.c c\iN-)� SCAPINS� Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are mere than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms. decorative wails. and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100.18.106 and 18.1081 :17T OF T1GAR0 Pre-Appllcatton Conference Motes Page 3 of 8 �r�.�a■da,nuc.a.un.ui■�tn,rn■uc s.ctla saans Sign permits must be obtain(' or to installation of any sign in the of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available L, fl request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. Meter to Cade Sacdee 18.1]4] SENSR[YE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas - within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based o- available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive•- I• - - - - I• 1 " •V 1•- 1.' t1 - - ••I ••••■ • I- _ I• ' : 1 ' ' - II— I• I - •_ I. .•I • sensitive lands musibe clearly indicated on • -ns submitted with the development application, Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains, IBefer to Cade Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.8. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.040.8.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. MIRED SEWERAGE AGENCY[ESA]BORER STANDARDS,S a,0 96-44 Purpose: Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall a directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowabl encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike th is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or grave walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive ar a, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to inimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. TT OF TIGARD Pre-Asou atlN Csshrgca NMSS Pm 4 N$ 1I-tasi!•s1al f/O atlesi umi Nattaa•t Satan Lo_caVegetated r'nrrldo In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract. and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R 8 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3.Design for SINMI TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot. parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed cr damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged. by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property. the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. CITY OF TIGARO Pre4gultcatlen Canterence Motes Page 5 of S 111-1ssluahI inucuf•.in.nul lust.■ts.cn.. The planting of a repl nent tree shall take place in a m. r reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section. a party may. with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. • [Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(01 SUBDIVISION PUT NAME RESERVATION Prior to submitting a Subdivision land use application with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 648-88841 IJUIRATiYEI The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.321 CODE SECTIONS 18.80 — 18.92 118.100 18.108 — 18.120 18.150 _ 18.84 18.96 18.102 18.114 18.130 18.160 18.88 18.98 -8.106 18.116 18.134 18.162 itij'ACT STUDY ) 18.164 As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur. with the dedication requirement. or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32.Section.050) When a condition of approval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 H11H000 MEETING Tne apb1 anfshall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held crier to submitting your aoolication cr the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] - :ITV OF T1GAR0 Pre-4lulicatioa Conference Motes Page o of 8 ter t.�r..mi u.uean.un.nI■i I.urt.■t Sect's' BUIIDI 6 PEAMi Plans for building and other reia.ed permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has been issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. • ECYCUNC p plicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Section 18.1161 AOOIT1ONA1 CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: / / 1 /1/t'C fi vP�-41'.A't/f'/ r A 11I 4 e 7 rr —r I . J t' L 4 f 77 a e r7 L d A_ 7 �A lY 4� / 'I./ o1.-- 14, A1/f Gre 7hvr-e 1-Yst 2-V 0' ,.0 vrL GI_ F. ) . 1-• L. - Ii . . 'I, D _ ) ` I"1 A: ,7 0, . L[J , Cy) 9,-k is‹ _f y`1 " /-e e, / Den el '17 /�.�a1f�" prvv,J/ )7ru7'rc7/or, /or fl-/Gf� PifeZ f1L) 4,1 /J Zend ellrre Al //4/ CN ( e•/ /f 69 1r 1 Cy; l-.1.ti. 7o ' o /L /— t►- e Ll, ray, 7� c 1/at,./ 1-- AA, c24/e - 1 f4l,, e (oi�r c?fur ) 04- eur,A 2 rvvm�Ls.72, Y C�� t r e d JG t e /71 d Wart Y e s_7L Q/.Iv r Cy,',1 tf i sue, r'e r N.,)'/' tj,J 1 `/'iv t,LA j ors. X1 0 ).� ?t!J y'ra7er - ) €Ave 1,�,,1�A h� a)or�{, , t /.11 ti di,/e f3 �1 1 cP v / ire/ � l/!�L If 2,_, / r< ke44�r t�A�/y '.-, a1 ' _d-e w� 4, 1�5 /-, -1 -I ' 17 L4 1 1 0l, i)� ��r?yj, / l JJ in 4 A E C / ] �/ �c /` d ti )--e rnY'v )K%41 tXG G N 1 c/ ,bi �j 7 't 1 T /r1J f/4iSl, a el ' W,c/e Le,, / . ,� rte.. - U�r±i r . / e /r a r � A%/< a� //7 ,-e 4 77 Y ex 1�t A<,/ 4/.0--71-�rJ*.f ∎/, ,4>.,4 ht./ b/f .c,.._ f 1 G// �7..r 71 l�Jl l d )— ki.t Pat '� v r/ - I- /A, w /1/ a)^e h n G... 7 )2 ,s) / 571 ' OF F,►'' 6, +rr„ <k CV,./.1 & ( CJ// row a •t e. 10-7,/r Iry D!4 J. f W P 4 << t,.) .0-4)- r1ti n di' », k / f' /, e "s., it e,..f.)1 e, aJ �liirecf &n el r, dvpiI-0)IPel d-A2; fl t' I /'TI 4.- I/ ) 7L, �l^1/1I,y'h .r4. G// f'{a// 6.e /oa..� L.cfit./ ,..,' `114 Cd /JJG,e,/ bG} v. .t w --c /J/y ?ROCEDURE Iv arceff /6( , Cs / A !/)/ 7 aJf hv-r 4 ' *Jr f '-/ � 1/DG w K �/can�vf- Tra c .1e4, -e,( eer4 dministrat.ve Sta Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public nearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or drooped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT bit accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be fcided IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81t" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. TY OF TIGAR0 Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 311-4alta.tlil aullcatlaa/M.ulaI IseartasetSactlso The Planning Division and Engi •ing Division will perform a prelimin. eview of the application and will _determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant If additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Pl't it' - 3 C G f`-"\M■SSiOt`{ A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process ig available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City start relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thin pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following thin conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: An 1) CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE (503) 639-4171 FAX (5031684-7297 c'lollalaatT .2a$tarsUnaof-cyst �IUum1 SacUar a sstsr1Unan<.aagl ;•-11u•97 3ITY OF T1GARO Pre-Application Conference Motes Page 8 of 8 11I1-i.sl/saCalmikados/Plautus IaaatvaaatSaceaa :„..„ I N 4 , GNIEERING SECTION CRY!Qfng Community D�Development Alka ,hapiry5 Better Community a 2SI 13 l?= PUBLIC FACILITIES Zoo The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1 .) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from terline. ( ) to et from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along ( ) street improvements will be necessary along ( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), n ssary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department section utility wires (a fee m- he collected if determined appropri-`, by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide side : (sidewalks may be required to b der on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ` ' Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. T ere are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW OLP---r-tAr - . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: • Sanitary Sewers: T e nearest s nitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in L) t-P . . The proposed evelopment must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. • - • - - ••- - - e•• •' • . C.-►ra(-G. , . s-riL4L� kg- `�C�(Z�,Q�L-- �J �- � Sv3 P,1'r }-/1A-i►-4-rQ■l cam- 5,4_0>> -cc, Water Supply: 1 The Water Disc t - Phone:(503) 6;1-4I7 f provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineering Deportment Section Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and .scue District (Contact: Gene Biro. (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. rr st R-M 5T1 l AQ AL,15 Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( L.Y Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 015 Engineering Department Section • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impa L Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon ' the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171 , ext. 304. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section Site Improvement , nit (SIT). This permit is genera issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: 1Z 11 ENGINEERING DEPAR MENT STAFF Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7291 h:\patty masters\preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 18-Nov-97 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD 4111. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: I 3T7 [APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENTS) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE 1 MARKED ITEMS, A) Application form (1 copy) E' B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed O- D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 1 E) Filing Fee $ SE E Sc>-tE• OL-t. I SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE 1 MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies IS- 1 . Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions ram 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) IB 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: 0 (a) Floodplain areas 0 (b) Slopes in excess of 25% 0 (c) Unstable ground azr- (d) Areas with high seasonal water table 0 (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential 0 (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils Q' 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats 0 (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings 0 (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 2< 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 0 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources t< 10. Location of existing utilities and easements GEt' 11. Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways la7 LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PAGE I OF 3 B) Site Development .i Indicating: No. of Copies 18 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties r� 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ❑ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation riK (e) Outdoor common areas r� (f) Above ground utilities e 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site c� (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions er' 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped ra 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques r21 ' 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11. The location of all structures and their orientation t3 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading Plan indicating: No. of Copies IS- The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines e' (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report Qr" (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ra" (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated i LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 3 D) Architectural Drab •s Indicating: No. of Copies I? The site developmL plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies . l The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: H) Preli ina Partition/Lot Line Adustment Ma. Indicatin:: No. of Copies 1. T - owner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. Th: owner's authorized agent ❑ 3. The ap scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Desc 'ption of parcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways w hin and adjacent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property I es ❑ 7. Location a o width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of .ny trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes gre., er than 25% ❑ 10. Location of exiting utilities and utility easements ❑ 11. For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The propos-d right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cro.s-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable de=. restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where appli, able ❑ LAND USE APPI.IGTION,/LIST PAGE 3 OF 3 I) Subdi ision Prelim; ,, Plat Map and Data Indicating: Jo. of Copies 1. Sc., e equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one pha-- per sheet ❑ 2. The • oposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicini , map showing property's relationship to arterial and collect.r streets ❑ 4. Names, ,ddresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of a• •Iication ❑ 6. Boundary II es of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of a•'acent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining panels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines r-lated to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grade. greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, loc. ion, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and pri .te right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and priv. e sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water rains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telep one transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations fo parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profit= of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water dist 'bution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire h 'rants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles sh•wing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a re.•onable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to in ndation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of :II water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, appro 'mate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used or purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon suc lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 ches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location ,•f proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including t - location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a st.tement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision provements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wet -nds & marsh areas ❑ 21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably •e shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrati e and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 4 OF 3 J) Solar Access Calculations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:Vogin1patry4nastenV-ddist.mst May 23.1995 LANO USE APPLICATION,UST PACE 5 OF 5 -, • December 1997 Pre-Apps (CC Meetings S M I W T F Sp; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday, December 23, 1997 8:00 8:30 fd Craker:685-7350 SDR 16200 Pac 1 9:00 ._ 9:30 dt , Iti. t�i ? t it #, M2ee ? :>`'> >: 10:00 9 5Vit`` ii id i e .. t:::... : .......::::::::: ::E::' :: : .. ... 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 4:00PM Wednesday, December 10, 1997 SEE MAP SCALE 11t= I00i 2S 1 12CD /- a TERM. "io' CR.23 2 W. T - - T— -T--+ -_� 0 - i k m9/3 -� (CR. 23-NO WIDTH STATED) _` I. 96.46769.1 95010646 96• ,429.! 120' 20' ' 300 200 \oU SEE MAP .88AC. 1.58AC. 401 its, 2S 112CD 2.62 AC. "1� 1-m \ W J Q vs N co a \/'i i as�� I Q o n n r c 120' 364.50�o�w 400 /0.5/Ac. H II rIo' see o w \OS gTF I -2 11 20'I 242.67 306 I SEE MAP 500 QC EAST �_ .1 1 2S 1 13B �— I4s.30' 23-74 • ACTIVE CASE : Grp Smry Edit Prcl Name Actn Cond Log-note Fee Doc Tag Misc Xit List fees for this case OaPRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCEaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac o :cPRE98-0002 : PROJECT:WAREHOUSE : STATUS :P : UPD: 01/27/98 : :JDA: ° o NAME •NICOLI ENGINEERING PRIM. . : SIT93 -0011 : ° o SITE ADDRESS : 07800 SW DURHAM RD JUR. . . :TIG: ° uaDESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (1) aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac o 2S113BA-00200 : 22, 320 sq. ft . warehouse/manufacturing building ° O 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 uaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac o TYPE OF PROJECT:COM: ZONING: I-P 0 uaNOTES (3) aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac o 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaai ADDITIONAI. DOCUMENTS - � ,,03E - 60c, c) ? Name of applican 7)/9)/f1 1 27••q"./11n/�� /7he-1 0 ,&7,--, Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # Address or General Location " L5 L,J• 7)L € 6'9 -71 /fell 7/la,in,-) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE 1.7)// -7).-7 ril` " ��— , do affirm that I am (represent) the party Initiating interest in a proposed 7)e-dE-4 1PrnE i affecting the land located at 78eTeD S. ca). at,,et,bgr,.t and did on the 9 day of . 1�n1 c..1- Y2 , 19 j.L personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 5.7 .�E J (.)",- -7 ✓?' application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 7,6619 S, W l ge-C" 114-- i /Y-4-7 1- (state location on property) This / day of v/I 4,j , 19 'Ft' Signature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this IL 9 �h day of 4 t_• _ 19 •� oF`iAL SEAL Notary Public for the State Oregon =pprr My Commission Expires: i ]% ) let 9• LOSLY,84 NC��gUC�O�q GO MISSI N MY COMMISSIN 036403 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City cf Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 gn\c\Fcsmot'a ACITY CTIGARD e D1EVELOPMENT SERVICES IMPORTANT PERMIT NOTICE '?E: Plan Check * 0 II ti c DAVID METZGER PO BOX 275 SHERWOOD OR 97140 'arcel : 2S113BA-00200 Ate Address: 07800 SW DURHAM RD subdivision. : 1 +lock : Lot : 'urisdiction: TID zoning : I-P emarks: etzger building site work. iris- tetter is- to confirm receipt of your 'Site Work or-Building permit--a:2pH- -- 'ation which has been forwarded to the plans examiner today for review. As a reminder, the associate land use case (s) is/are: �/Z 9 -- ...7 Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case (s) and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person (s) indicated on your final order. Your building plans ARE NOT routed to the planning or engineering departments You must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. After the building plans review process has been completed, your site work or building permit will NOT be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments. If you have any_questions "regarding this notice, please contact oe directly at 639-4171 for further clarification. Sincerely, .„,... ,.,, ..,./ /_,,....".f<'_7(z_Ae Dove opment Services Technics n cce Building Department Planning Department ✓ En gineering Department .: ✓ DATE. PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT TITLE. COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE. TAX MAP NO.. SITES NO.ADDRESS. LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 179.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 45.00 OFFICE $ 164.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 172.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 74.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE (T.EGORY Dz4E G TI� 7F E WEEKDAY AVJ. , WEEKEND AVIE RATE TRIP RATE /7 BASIS: - 1-e D 7,7 CC GC 4 --y rLxi�-d- _ CALCULATIONS: /moo X 1 g.Da PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FEE. FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: .vr� / �L-` /5 0) a"./ Ofiltd-e ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT:-./ d G.6. PREPARED BY'. r I:TIFWKST.DOC(DST) 05/19/1998 12:01 624-8' SCHMIDT 'SAN PAGE 01 SCHMIDT SANITARY SERVICE, INC. 8325 S.W. Ross St. Tigard. Oregon 97224 Phone 639-2378 Solid Waste Disposal. Recycll.n4, and Drop Box Service Establt�hed to'11948 FAX it ( 5 0 3 ) 624-075 F A X C O V E R IS H E E T 0 p..., . . /9- 41/CC)L/ ,HONE: PA UMBER: _ r5 1 (2‘ 'e sending pages (including this page) . If ,ir: . 3c not receive all of these pages , please call us as ssc, as possible. THANK YOU iI fa 05/19/1998 12:01 624-8" SCHMIDT 'SAN ' PAGE 02 SCHMIDT SANITARY SERVICE, INC. 8325 S.W. Ross St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Phone 639.2378 Solid Waste Disposal. Recycling, and Drop Box Service Eatabllahcd In 1948 May 19 , 1G98 Nicoll Ergineering 902S S. W . Center St. Tigard , '•regon 97223 RE: Met::.ger Building 780C S.W. Durham Rd. Ti%yard, Oregon 97224 ATT: Jim Andrews Dear Jim , Your s) i-.= location for solid waste and recycling enclosure will meet Ol. r needs to provide service. As per our phone conversation enlarg; •, : enclouser to 14x20 feet would ensure that all our eyuipme,Y will fit inside the enclosure. We would also like to have "No Parking" signs placed around the enclosur . Thank yr,•. Larry, Sr-:midi . _ „ • 1„ oiji ij ■ ti Al _ I! . 4"11 ![�� and Construction Services, Inc. June 9, 1998 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn. Will D'Andrea Re: Metzger Building SDR 98-0004 7800 SW Durham Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. D'Andrea: The following comments are in response to your conditions of approval comments from the above noted Site Development review. My numbered responses correlate to your numerical listing under each category. If you have any comments or questions please do not hesitate to call. 1. Understood. The water line and meter are already on site, therefore a street opening permit will not be required for this aspect of the project. 2. Mr. David Metzger will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing financial assurances for the public improvements. His address is PO Box 275, Sherwood, OR 97140. 3. Understood. Mr. Metzger has been notified of this requirement. 4. Final plans and calculations will be submitted to the engineering department and approved prior to issuance of building or site permits. 5. Understood. 6. -see following- A. The street tree calipers have been noted as 3". The "golden chain" trees are not to be classified as a "street tree." The landscaping area along Durham Road has been increased to 10'-0" from the street property line to the face of curb.(see sheet 1.1) City of Tigard-Planning Department Planning Department-SDR-98-0004 June 9, 1998 Page 2 B. Proposed roof top mechanical units have been noted on sheet 3.1. A note , requiring the units are to be screened, has also been added. Please note that the owner has refined the building's color scheme. The elevation has been revised to reflect this change.(see sheet 3.1) C. The additional disabled parking space has been added to the site plan, adjacent to the proposed space already noted.(see sheet 1.1) D. Three bicycle spaces have been noted on the site plan (see sheet 1.1). The additional parking space will be provided inside the building.(see sheets 1.1 & 3.1) E. The solid waste hauler approval letter has been enclosed for your review. 7. A lighting plan has been submitted to Tigard Police Department for their review and approval. 8. At this time the applicant is proposing to pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 9. Understood. 10. Understood. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager enclosures , 2750 SW. Pacific Hwy. �' p �P.O. Box 23784 - �.A OF TmlamsIJVIJD�G".1- OVA�r� �s Tigard, Oregon 97223 1141C11. g O,TE JOB NO and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 Co•q • 9 9"1 052.2. ATTENTION RE k. 11)2 4J 1. VlbV_ ‘ 1-. st- - ; — 6 tCL 9P, –000-etc GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached D Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans O Samples ❑ Specifications O Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 2 . 13•18 3 S l..v-L.K.e.4, - Zltio—e.7,4 1 .I r 1. 2- t- '391 me ,A.ecs? 5 •2 to •(187 5 • 1°1 . 92, 2 1■.all 4 ..4-i v S Q.<,& L 1 rte., a. 14 c .c1 (S ell wind, ) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use O Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution O As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment O ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 C PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY To SIGNED: N!C �,; i 1 _750 S.W. Pacific Hwy. � L-R OF IrRA SNITT = _ ��� P.O. Box 23784 S IJ ll n] n] ll\J G *Of I . =1151°mil►� Tigard, Oregon 97223 h:ZU.nanzailow DATE JOB NO LP •and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 9 • 8 q`] b S 2'L ATTENTION vw► l�J • RE TO �Q-e-i-�—v • -_ RECEIVED PLANNING JUN 11 1998 CITY OF TI ARD GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑tents ❑ Plans O Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION I 2 •13.1 a 1.2- - t . t 3. I — LLL .43 T 06.-•:.-Q 1 F- r _ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted U Submit copies for distribution El As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment O ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS V\A n . 1 d _ L.Z¢1 1/2,.-eNt..Ae a, �r e-ta..6,y0/ 6 n-.t� o-, QE.�,o (1.`o r 7t"_ �.cr�-L...1 IA^ 1 1-13\\kv c\L S c Qec.( adaq■\L, c oak\\�vd . A Q,W,ra! `eco�rAVitd«A o �J • V o\''C ko•10-Aa COPY TO M. * * 1 . . . .. { P.O. Box 23784fic Hwy. -,S u u LSn1 olr u nl/f,1NSMITT[,=,1- E 1 Tigard, Oregon 97223 �' 1 i Vsd t o.rE cos No and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 9O ' 11 • 9 2t> c Z b S 2.1. ATTENTION • t .--�� Wn .J .yam TO C 1 l PE tA_ I'J wikiistkol _TsaA,v,.66, ..r__t:2ds,r:„,st,A__ 5 P 12- re:-o oi GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 2.11.9 b ✓ Q.L:r.9.A "Ah.4-4.d Law.. 14�c.. �--P-1.6,,,,, _ ,.�:t�,,,,..>LQ 4t a�x .,,,) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval 2" For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 G PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: /� ^D July 8, 1998 Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 RE: Metzger Building Outstanding Conditions of Approval - SDR 98-0004 Dear Jim: Thank you for your rapid response to my request for a revised landscaping plan addressing the spacing of Street Trees on SW Durham Road and for the Bicycle Parking detail. I would like to request further clarification on the bicycle parking and pass on the feedback from my colleagues on the screening of rooftop mechanicals. Firstly, on the bicycle issue, please drop me a note explaining how the inside bicycle parking space will be defined. Will it be as formal as the outdoor racks? My specific concerns are: 1. That the space will be secure and formally set aside for bicycle parking; and 2. That a person wheeling a bicycle either in or out of the building will be able to navigate the doors without difficulty. Secondly, on the rooftop screening issue, the City does require a screening plan for the rooftop mechanicals prior to site and building permit approval. Your situation with respect to tenant specified equipment is not uncommon and there are general screening standards that can be addressed without this specific knowledge. Please submit a screening plan that demonstrates generally, how the rooftop mechanicals will be screened. Your elevations should show how the rooftop locations selected will minimize visibility and list materials and techniques to be used in screening the equipment. If a number of potential equipment configurations exist that would require different approaches to screening, show how each scenario could be effectively screened, either by changing the rooftop locations of the equipment to take advantage of the roofline's natural screening effect, or through add-on screening treatments. When these two concerns have been satisfactorily addressed, I will be able to sign-off on your planning-related Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions in the meantime, please call me at 503-639-4171 ext. 315. Sincerely, M. J. Roberts Associate Planner I:\cu rpin\mjr\sdr98-04.let c: SDR 98-0004 land use file July 8, 1998 gAltdCiA Jim Andrews CITY OF TIGARD Nicoli Engineering PO Box 23784 OREGON Tigard, OR 97281 RE: Metzger Building Outstanding Conditions of Approval - SDR 98-OO6 Dear Jim: Thank you for your rapid response to my request for a revised landscaping plan addressing the spacing of Street Trees on SW Durham Road and for the Bicycle Parking detail. I would like to request further clarification on the bicycle parking and pass on the feedback from my colleagues on the screening of rooftop mechanicals. Firstly, on the bicycle issue, please drop me a note explaining how the inside bicycle parking space will be defined. Will it be as formal as the outdoor racks? My specific concerns are: 1. That the space will be secure and formally set aside for bicycle parking; and 2. That a person wheeling a bicycle either in or out of the building will be able to navigate the doors without difficulty. Secondly, on the rooftop screening issue, the City does require a screening plan for the rooftop mechanicals prior to site and building permit approval. Your situation with respect to tenant specified equipment is not uncommon and there are general screening standards that can be addressed without this specific knowledge. Please submit a screening plan that demonstrates generally, how the rooftop mechanicals will be screened. Your elevations should show how the rooftop locations selected will minimize visibility and list materials and techniques to be used in screening the equipment. If a number of potential equipment configurations exist that would require different approaches to screening, show how each scenario could be effectively screened, either by changing the rooftop locations of the equipment to take advantage of the roofline's natural screening effect, or through add-on screening treatments. When these two concerns have been satisfactorily addressed, I will be able to sign-off on your planning-related Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions in the meantime, please call me at 503-639-4171 ext. 315. Si cerely, M. J. Roberts Associate Planner i:\curpin\mjrlsd r98-04.1et c: SDR 98-0004 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 TXGARD POLICE September 2, 1998 M.J., I have reviewed the lighting designs for SDR 98-0004 (Metzger Building) and find no further recommendations. The lighting as planned appears to be within the scope of crime prevention and the Tigard Police Department. Thank you. Jim Wolf Crime Prevention Officer Tigard Police Department February 10, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD Dave Metzger PO Box 275 OREGON Sherwood, OR 97140 Dear Mr. Metzger: • Thank you for meeting me at your project site at 7800 SW Durham Road. This letter is a summary of outstanding items that need to be complete before I can authorize a final inspection and Certificate of Occupancy for this site. • Submit a copy of the lighting plan (as revised) for approval by Jim Wolf in the Tigard Police Department. He should sign the plans as approved and forward to me for placement in the file. •" Paint directional markings on the pavement on both sides of the building as shown on the original plans. Paint the curbs along the driveways as shown on the original plans. - . Submit a deposit for the landscaping along the west side of the building as discussed. The deposit may be released once the landscaping is installed or when a plan is approved for an addition as discussed. • Provide tenant information to confirm that the parking is adequate in accordance with Condition of Approval #10. • Once the above items are complete, I will sign off on all conditions and let the Building Division know there are no remaining Planning Division conditions to satisfy. If you have any question, please call me at 503-639-4171, extension 407. Sincerely, 77a17* Julia Powell Hajd Associate Planner i:\curpin\julia\Dave Metzger letter.doc c: SDR98-00004 Land Use file Albert Sheilds, Housing Inspector 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 `06/04/1995 09:24 15036912752 PAGE 01 r�,r Af ""( CA--• t l kt 4\ Li 0 221 to 5., ..Q.I.e' ' ' PROPOSAL Page Page N0 J •m', ..._`.:' a _f't.r`s.... .._.... .!Voce te' U Cif` 5011 of Pages M ..w DATE 2 ---------1W--1' A14-00 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: �1Z-r2. ma_ a YtYLUAsi-* — i4g-It1'Vt WA l?..rG ROLLS STREET A ' a 9.-70 sraa CITY I,$ TE a71 ..s.... ::. y6Ll(/21 t 9 W •ttor�s I�'!, r�•. 1.. �: � eat„ :;f..,� .. -', �'� '. 1'C� A40\0r11 .f��..t - ; t ��. 3°7 — R1/4totoio.‘40e4A.7 .)-1 a1A-1 4Alzgr-, 0 i Owc4 - 374 Cvoc—r t 1 t4A- 4 -TYZ, -- Co--7 1 0 55—e.c....3~t0 • 1 sco lc...—'Ul.,p 4k pcitg,j4-r. /o .° 30 lr , :.`i\\:',,?. ..s:t'I.I:..,I.t,SI.A . �..y.. -'7.h ..1.. .'.!„ :�' 3.. 0. '. .t ... . .. We her propose to furnish labor and materials - complete in accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of O Q' -V- dollars ($ /C "—. ) with payment to be made as follows: to be as specified, All work to be completed in s workmadike manner according to standard practices.Any alteration or deviation Ali material bo p dfic guaranteed ions upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All from above aped involving extra costs,will be executed only Poe days and is void agreements contingent upon strikes,accident or delays beyond our contmi p l : acceptance within..., - thereafter at the option of the undersigned. • _ejdC. ( Ms wool u ii /O_? (0 3G- Authorised:$ L4�- i": ; �.; :;. ` . .0P s•At; : The above P rices,specifications and conditions are hereby accept a You are IP 'ized to do the work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. ACCEPTED: Signature $ignature_ DA'L'E— 0 E4 Cow+forms FORM NO.EZ 110 ,Ms fG.s C4 ()Jib;r\ 10 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER 7800 SW Durham Rd. Tigard,Oregon 97224 �^`447' 5"itct5 Suite 100 - Spectra Precision, Inc. - 5250 Sq. Ft. y 2 Use- Repair lasers and sell wholesale to construction industry. i)hf SNat4iv'.‘( Suite 200 -Classic signs - 5250 Sq. Ft. V.V Use- Builds architectural signs for interior and exterior of commercial buildings. a �ids9�e. 5+143 Suite 300 -Exhibits Northwest, Inc. - 5250 Sq. Ft. 14 3- Use - Distributor of exhibits for businesses to use in trade shows. 4.,( 5 Suite 400 -Consignment Concepts -2625 Sq. Ft. 2,1 Use- Sale of consignment furniture,wholesale and retail Old 01'les'/c °94as??Suite 500 -Pacific Electronics Marketing, Inc. -2625 Sq. Ft. ,/ Use-Distributor of cellular phones and accessories. 2! spites re��,'%ed C1TYkOF TIGARD, OREGON 21305 Vendor: DAVID METZGER CONST INC Check Date: 06/18/2002 Vendor No: PER00158 Vendor Acct No: Check Amount: 51,000.00 Invoice Number Date Description Invoice Amount Refund-Permit 06/17/2002 Landscaping Deposit/Receipt 00-321753 1,000.00 TH FA _ •FT I MENTHA AC•L•-E• =.0 R•UNDON WHITE -A'E• CITY OF TIGARD BANK OF AMERICA P4-7338 2130 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. PORTLAND.OREGON 97204 3230 Tigard, OR 97223 . •�_l, (503) 639-4171 CITY OF TIGARD Fed. I.D. # 93-0503940 VOID AFTER 180 DAYS • Pay: *** One thousand dollars and Zero cents Date Amount 06/18/2002 $1,000.00 To the order of: DAVID METZGER CONST INC - . POBOX 400 Aulnn■teC Sgnat,re SHERWOOD,OR 97140 +�� AuBronz•d Signature El SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED.DETAILS ON BACK. U CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 21305 Vendor: DAVID METZGER CONST INC Check Date: 06/18/2002 Vendor No:PER00158 Vendor Acct No: Check Amount: 51,000.00 Invoice Number Date Description Invoice Amount Refund-Permit 06/17/2002 Landscaping Deposit/Receipt 00-321753 1,000.00 4 .i l n•hl i i. .._.IE4q flU 31NFVS COk6,. 3.r.o. _ ,i,--?, - CITY OF TIGARD EXPENDITURE REQUEST This form is a multi-use form. Appropriate receipts and documentation must be attached to this form. Approved request due Monday 5:00 PM to A/P for checks by Friday. VENDOR NO.: Pte- 00 /58 DATE: June 13, 2002 PAYABLE TO : David Metzger Construction Inc. REQUESTED BY: Jerree Gaynor PO Box 400 Sherwood, OR 97140 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES: Date Description, Invoice No.,etc. Account No. Amount 6/13/02 Refund of landscaping deposit- 100-0000-229000 $1,000.00 Jackson Business Center, 7800 SW Durham; Receipt#00-321753 TOTAL $1,000.00 Mileage 36.5 APPROPRIATION BALANCE: AS OF: PURCHASING: APPROVALS: (IF UNDER$50) Section Manager/Professional Staff (IF UNDER $2500) Division Manager )1� (IF UNDER$7500) Department Manager (IF UNDER$25000) City Administrator (IF OVER$25000) Local Contract Review Board